HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-12-22 PRC packet CITY OF STILLWATER
STILLWATER PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
NOTICE OF MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2014 AT 7:00 PM
The City of Stillwater Parks and Recreation Commission will meet on Monday, December 22,
2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
AGENDA
1. Approval of the Joint Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission
September 22, 2014 Minutes.
2. Approval of the October 27, 2014 Minutes.
3. Open Forum - The Open Forum is a portion of the meeting to address the Board on
subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Board may take action or reply
at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the
concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your
comments to 5 minutes or less.
Action Items
4. Trails Master Plan
5. Field Use Fee
Informational Items
6. Brown’s Creek Preserve Update – Available Monday
Commission Items/Topics
CITY OF STILLWATER
JOINT MEETING OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 22, 2014
Present: Parks Chair Linda Amrein, Parks Commissioners Don Stiff, Sandy
Snellman; Planning Chair Michael Kocon, Planning Commissioners Sean
Hade, Chris Lauer, Anne Siess; Councilmembers Mike Polehna, Tom
Weidner, and Doug Menikheim
Absent: Parks Commissioners David Brandt, Scott Christensen, Rob McGarry,
Solveg Peterson; Planning Commissioners Ryan Collins, Jenna Fletcher,
Eric Hansen, Cameron Kelly, Gim Middleton
Staff present: Community Development Director Bill Turnblad, City Planner Abbi
Wittman, Public Works Superintendent Tim Moore
Others present: Jim Herbert; Michael Jischke, SRF Consulting Group
BARGE TERMINAL PARK PLAN JOINT MEETING
Community Development Director Turnblad described the property being discussed:
several thousand feet of shoreline and a narrow strip of property that was once used for
railroad and industrial uses. Several things warrant a plan update at this time: 1) the
new river crossing is underway and MnDOT is constructing a loop trail as part of the
mitigation package, with two trail segments that traverse this property; 2) the City
acquired historic buildings that will be reused in some way; 3) the DNR may install a
public boat access at the south end of the site. SRF Consulting, in conjunction with
Baird & Associates, has been working on the plan. Meetings have occurred with various
stakeholders. The Commissions will look at conceptual layouts tonight.
Michael Jischke, SRF Consulting Group, discussed the planning process, timelines, and
the current state of the shoreline. Planning must be cognizant of flooding, stormwater
runoff, stormwater treatment basins developed by MnDOT and existing vegetation. He
showed the boundaries of the cultural landscape district and archeological district which
includes almost all the barge terminal property. The parcel is 20 acres; 250 feet at its
widest, 3600 feet long (over 1/2 mile). He pointed out the preferred boat launch location
near the north end where the two Bergstein buildings are.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon pointed out there are at least four dock/launch
locations. He asked why the two closest to downtown were not preferred.
Mr. Jischke responded that the launch areas closer to downtown were not preferred
locations due to potential for flooding and visual impact on Lowell Park. He went on to
present a lower intensity concept and a higher intensity concept for the site. He
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
Page 2 of 4
presented a photo illustrating some challenges at the north end of site where there is
probably only room for one way vehicle access. There also needs to be some parking
provided on the site.
Councilmember Weidner asked about the delineation between St. Croix Boat and
Packet property and the City’s property.
Community Development Director Turnblad explained what St. Croix Boat and Packet
owns and what that company leases from the City.
Mr. Jischke stated there were a couple concepts developed for a boat launch at the
south end of the site. The existing publicly accessible spaces near the Andiamo are
hard to see, so it is felt that a new dock is warranted. There are many traditional park
uses that would be appropriate, as well as some interpretive elements and the
opportunity to have performing arts such as Shakespeare in the Park or a temporary
tent for a concert. The concept of “natural play” areas could be incorporated. There may
be opportunities for vendors in the park as well.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon noted it would be nice to be able to kayak or
canoe into Stillwater and dock somewhere other than the marina. It wouldn’t even
require docks, just a rack. He asked if that would be feasible.
Mr. Jischke responded that non-motorized watercraft should definitely be considered.
Councilmember Polehna pointed out the Aiple property north of downtown is intended to
be a more natural area - that may be a possibility for kayaks and canoes.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein agreed she would like to see a non-motorized
watercraft area.
Community Development Director Turnblad added that the reuse study for the two
Bergstein buildings will be done later this fall; they could be used to rent kayaks or
canoes.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein noted the Parks Commission has discussed potential
use of the historic buildings for interpretative exhibits, bathrooms, and putting a vendor
there to sell beverages.
Councilmember Weidner remarked he has heard boaters are hesitant to tie up on the
levee wall because of the damage caused by wakes. Could the City consider a no-wake
zone, rather than building more docks?
Community Development Director Turnblad responded that the wake/no-wake issue is
intensely debated by the boating community. It might be possible to encourage
temporary dockage along the wall but it may not be a substitute for a dedicated dock.
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
Page 3 of 4
Mr. Jischke presented a scenario that includes a transient linear dock to accommodate
different size watercraft pulling up.
Councilmember Weidner asked if there was a study done to determine how many boats
need access?
Planning Commissioner Siess remarked that in one of the plans there are five trailer
parking spots and in the other plan there are 15. These are small numbers considering
the current demand.
Mr. Jischke replied that the footprint of the parking lot is limited by the terrain. It is the
size lot that MnDOT proposed.
Community Development Director Turnblad added that the size of the parking lot to
support the launch is based on available space - the property is narrow and there are
other uses such as a lift station and other things that can’t be moved. Even in the more
intense scenario, the DNR could find a maximum space for approximately 16 boats.
Regarding the analysis of the need, the consulting group talked with almost every
marina down to Prescott asking about the need for transient slips and was told there is
a need for more transient boat docking in Stillwater.
Mr. Jischke explained the higher intensity scenario would include a bigger parking area
adjacent to the boat launch, possibly a multipurpose shelter, and possibly a pedestrian
promenade to connect with Lowell Park. This would be a more urban style riverfront.
Parks Commission Chair Amrein asked about locations for fishing from shore.
Councilmember Polehna remarked that LaCrosse has bump-outs along the promenade
for people to sit or fish.
Community Development Director Turnblad noted fishing may not be compatible near
St. Croix Boat & Packet. There is a fishing pier proposed for the barge terminal property
and one planned for the Aiple property north of downtown.
Planning Commission Chairman Kocon suggested that the Kolliner property across the
river may be a better location for a boat dock because it’s sheltered from the current.
Mr. Jischke confirmed there is potential for a dock there.
Community Development Director Turnblad added there was also discussion, if money
were not an issue, about having non-motorized watercraft in the protected bay, and
motorized watercraft south of the Andiamo. The reason the team didn’t consider using
the Wisconsin side for the primary dock location is that Wisconsin DNR and WisDOT
would be involved, and it would take more lobbying effort and advocacy. In Minnesota,
the City has jurisdiction and control of the property. Kolliner Park is intended for trails
and passive use.
Joint Parks and Planning Commission Meeting September 22, 2014
Page 4 of 4
Councilmember Polehna asked about the rules for clearing brush, buckthorn, locust and
boxelder.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied tree removal and clearing must be
approved by the DNR.
Councilmember Weidner asked about old foundations on the site.
City Planner Wittman replied the City is seeking grants for stabilizing soils. She showed
photos of some of the existing archeological resources.
Planning Commissioner Lauer asked about moving the Welcome to Stillwater sign.
Community Development Director Turnblad responded that the mitigation plan for the
bridge includes a place for a welcome sign.
Councilmember Weidner asked how the Parks Commission prioritizes projects based
on budgeting.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied that they come up with a preferred
concept, then staff puts together an estimate of costs, then it goes into the capital
improvement program which goes before the Council for decision making. Over time,
funds are earmarked for certain kinds of improvements. The nice thing about this plan is
that the capital for some of the features comes out of other budgets.
Public Works Superintendent Moore added that over the last three years, staff has
brought the capital improvement working list before the Parks Commission for
discussion. Staff tries to follow this list as much as possible. The barge terminal park
project is not on that working list.
City Planner Wittman added that many of the features in this project will be funded by
outside sources like state grants.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied the timing depends on the
community and the Council’s priorities. As funds are identified, certain elements of the
plan can be completed. A key part of any plan is an implementation schedule. Planning
is sometimes very long term. He encouraged the commissioners to send staff
comments, questions and suggestions. There will be an open house scheduled in about
a month.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Kink
Recording Secretary
CITY OF STILLWATER
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING
October 27, 2014
Present: Chair Linda Amrein, Commissioners David Brandt, Scott Christiansen,
Rob McGarry, Solveg Peterson, Sandy Snellman, Don Stiff, Council
Liaison Mike Polehna
Absent: None
Staff present: Public Works Superintendent Tim Moore, Planning Consultant Melissa
Douglas
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Snellman, seconded by Amrein, to approve the September 22, 2014 meeting
minutes. All in favor.
OPEN FORUM
Hank Gray, 231 North Everett Street, expressed the Stillwater High School Mountain
Bike Team’s continued interest in efforts to build a single track. He knows the City is
awaiting an answer from the DNR. He thanked the Commission for its support. The
season ended yesterday at the Minnesota Championship. The team had its first state
champion, three podium finishers, and ten top ten state finishers. The team finished fifth
overall in Division I. The Middle School team finished four of the top five on the podium
and finished seventh in the state.
ACTION ITEMS
Trails Master Plan
Melissa Douglas, Planning Consultant, reviewed BikeMN’s Bicycle Friendly Community
Assessment Report. The report recommended allocating staff time to bicycle activities
in the community and developing a bicycle advocacy group and a bicycle plan that
includes bicycle projects and priorities in Stillwater’s Comprehensive Plan.
Brandt and Amrein said they liked the idea of forming a group to address bicycle
concerns, with representation from the Planning and Parks Commissions.
McGarry wondered if it’s necessary to dedicate City staff time to bike activities. He
pointed out that the City doesn’t organize events in the parks, it just oversees park
usage.
Polehna reported on a national parks convention where he heard a presentation about
the economic and health benefits that a bike trail can bring to a community.
Douglas summarized that she is hearing that having a point person at the City is a good
idea. How exactly that would be done is not under the purview of the Commission. She
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
October 27, 2014
Page 2 of 3
will get the draft ready for review at the next meeting. Hopefully the Trails Master Plan
might be adopted sometime first quarter 2015.
Frank Piontek, a serious bike rider for decades, said he has a good feel for what
comprises a welcoming and pleasant riding experience. With the Gateway Trail, the
new Brown’s Creek Trail and the “two bridges” trail, there is a great opportunity to
promote bicycling for recreation and fitness. Point people will be needed to coordinate
what may be not only a regional-class but a national-class amenity for the City.
Amrein said she hopes the Stillwater High School Mountain Bike team will have some
input. She also hopes that there can be enforcement of traffic rules for bicyclists.
Douglas said she will start incorporating these ideas into the plan. For the next meeting,
she will bring back the plan document with the sections that are ready to be written up.
The Commission will need to discuss sidewalks and look at the multi-use trail system as
a whole to make sure all connector segments are included on the map.
Name the Park Contest
Moore presented a list of the top choices selected by Commissioners. Polehna
suggested appointing a committee of Council, Planning, Heritage Preservation, and
Parks Commission members and maybe a community member to select the name, for
final approval by the Council.
Motion by Snellman, seconded by McGarry, to recommend to the Council the six names
that had the most votes (Bridgeview Park, Liftbridge Park, Loggers Park, Mill Park,
Riverfront Park, and Sawmill Park), and to recommend that McGarry represent the
Parks Commission on the name selection committee to be formed. All in favor. Amrein
abstained because she submitted a name.
Commercial Use of Public Facilities
Moore reviewed the revised proposed Commercial Recreational Use Permit Policy. The
City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed policy.
Motion by Amrein, seconded by McGarry, to recommend that the Council approve the
Commercial Recreational Use Permit Policy with grammatical corrections noted. All in
favor.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Friends of Stillwater Parks
Amrein referred to a letter from Dennis Conger, president of Friends of Stillwater Parks,
stating their Board of Directors has decided to discontinue the Park Garden Committee.
Moore suggested inviting Friends of Parks in to talk with them about what their focus will
be, or doing an adopt-a-park program. Commission consensus was that staff should
start working on this.
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
October 27, 2014
Page 3 of 3
Eagle Scout Project
Moore noted that Josiah Gregg and his troop have completed building and installing the
bridge located in the Brown’s Creek Nature Preserve, as his Eagle Scout project. Public
Works is working on the approaches to the bridge to complete the project.
COMMISSION ITEMS/TOPICS
Moore reported that the City’s eight foot wide blacktop and nature preserve trails are
shown on maps posted at the kiosk across from Gannons and at Brown’s Creek Nature
Preserve. Work is progressing on the Lowell Park bathrooms with block being laid
today. Parking lot construction on the north end of downtown has stalled because of a
concrete shortage. Polehna noted staff are trying to figure out how to anchor a
community Christmas tree in Lowell Park. The Dog Park is now officially open and being
well used.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Snellman, seconded by Brandt, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting was
adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Julie Kink
Recording Secretary
Date: November 24, 2014
To: Parks Commission
Tim Moore, Public Works Superintendent
Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Abbi Wittman, City Planner
From: Melissa Douglas, Planning Consultant
Re: City of Stillwater, Trails Master Plan Update, Sidewalk Standards
This week, we’ll have a discussion on sidewalk
standards as part of the regular Parks
Commission meeting and develop
recommendations to be included in the plan.
This memorandum provides background
information useful for review prior to the
meeting.
Existing Conditions
Sidewalks existing as of the last Comprehensive
Plan update in 2008 are shown on the attached
map. Residential areas in Stillwater vary
depending on the era of development – some
neighborhoods have sidewalks on both sides of
the street, some neighborhoods have sidewalks
on one side of the street and others have no
sidewalks or sidewalks on major (collector and
arterial) roadways only.
Zoning and Land Use
Zoning and land use maps for Stillwater were
included in your background information folder
provided at an earlier meeting. Please review
these maps before the Parks Commission
meeting.
Vision and Guiding Principles
Build on Stillwater’s history and natural
setting to become a leading active
transportation community and one of
Minnesota’s premier trail destinations.
Community. A destination trail system that
serves the people of Stillwater as well as
visitors, businesses and employers.
Promotes tourism, job creation and
economic vitality. Provides access to nature
and understanding of the city’s history.
Safety. A trail system that ensures safe
recreation and travel for all trail users
regardless of age or ability. Encourages
activity and wellness.
Accessibility. A trail system that is easily
accessed and accommodates a mix of users
inclusive of all abilities. Information about
the trail system is readily accessible and
easy to understand.
Connections. A trail system that links
neighborhoods, schools, employment
opportunities, commercial areas, regional
trails and public transportation and
connects members of the community to
each other and the landscape.
Communication. A trail system that
educates and interprets the landscape and
natural setting, uses technology to make
information widely available and includes
signage that is clear and informative.
City of Stillwater Trails Master Plan Update – Sidewalk Standards
2
Both land use and zoning are tools planners use to regulate development. In residential areas,
land use designations regulate density, typically in units per acre. Zoning standards regulate the
type of housing (single-family homes, apartments, etc.), the arrangement of housing units
(attached versus detached, building height, setbacks) and lot sizes. At previous meetings, the
Parks Commission discussed developing sidewalk standards that reflect differences in
neighborhood character. One method to achieve that goal would be to link sidewalk standards
to zoning districts. For example, in residential areas with lower densities and larger lots,
sidewalks may only be needed on one side of residential streets.
Areas with higher densities and smaller lots would have more use and need sidewalks on both
sides of residential streets.
City of Stillwater Trails Master Plan Update – Sidewalk Standards
3
To meet the vision and guiding principles outlined for the Trail Master Plan update and the goals
and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, I would recommend a minimum standard of sidewalks
one side of all residential streets in the RA – One-Family Residential, TR - Traditional
Residential and LR - Lakeshore Residential zoning districts. Sidewalks should be installed on
both sides of the street in other residential districts, in commercial areas and along any arterial
roadways (excluding Highway 36). The plan should include flexibility for planned unit
developments so that the City would have flexibility to tailor sidewalk requirements in larger
planned developments.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Tim Moore, Superintendent of Public Works
DATE: December 17, 2014
SUBJECT: Field Use Fee
BACKGROUND
In the past, Public Works has had an agreement with the Stillwater School District and the St.
Croix Valley Baseball Association for grooming and chalking fields for games. With the
introduction of Lacrosse in 2013 and the Valley Athletic Association which include baseball,
softball, football and soccer in 2014 the City’s published field use rates need to be updated.
DISCUSSION
Currently the rates for baseball and softball are as follows:
Lower Lily $20.00 per game
Upper Lily $15.00 per game
Public Works $15.00 per game
Staff is recommending the addition of the following rates:
Lacrosse $20.00 per game
Football $25.00 per game
Soccer $20.00 per game
Baseball and softball on all other City fields will be $15.00 per game
These rates will cover the cost of materials and some maintenance of equipment.
RECOMMENDATION
If the Parks and Recreation Commission concurs they should pass a resolution recommending
these rates beginning in 2015 to the City Council.
r water;
T IS E B1 R T H P I A C L O F M I N N h ti 0 I A
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING DATE: December 22, 2014
REGARDING: Brown's Creek Preserve and Mountain Bike proposal
PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner
BACKGROUND
In late 2013 the Commission received a proposal for a mountain bike park to be incorporated
into the Brown's Creek Preserve and Park, in the NW quadrant of the City. The first phase of a
three phase proposal was set for a public hearing by the Commission until City staff determined
bicycling was not a permitted use as per a 2005 management plan of this area, as well as a
Department of Natural Resources Conservation Easement on the land. The public hearing was
not held.
In April, 2014, Tim Moore and I walked the preserve area with TJ Debates, DNR Area
Supervisor (East Metro Area Fisheries) and his supervisor, Brad Parsons, Regional Fisheries
Manager, as the Conservation Easement is held by the Fisheries Division due to Brown's Creek
improvements. We discussed the desire to allow for mountain bikes on this parcel in a
specifically designed fashion and asked their consideration of a change to the easement,
allowing the City to amend the management plan.
CURRENT PROTECT
To date, the City has not received a response from the DNR. As such, staff has been preparing a
letter to the DNR for the Council's formal consideration. The thought is a formal request from
the City Council may be considered in a more timely fashion.
In late October, however, the DNR opened the Browr s Creek trail, starting conversations with
City staff regarding trail kiosks and existing city improvements on the DNR easement area
through the park and preserve area. In discussing this with Rachel Hinzman, Parks and Trails
Area Supervisor, it has been determined the DNR would like to place a trail kiosk on City lands
in downtown Stillwater as well as enter into an agreement with the City of Stillwater for the
City's trails and parking lot on DNR lands. City planning and engineering has indicated
willingness to these things. However, no formal agreements have been made.
In recent discussions with City Attorney Magnuson, it has been determined all existing and
proposal City/DNR improvements must be considered at one time. This is to ensure piecemeal
approvals do not continue to occur, with the City's request continuing to be ignored. Our
Page 1 of 2
�
tj wa ter
I+ E •B 1 R T N P L A G L OF M I N N E", 0 f A
approval of the downtown kiosk, land use agreement authorization as well as their formal
consideration of the change to the City's management plan must occur together.
STAFF ACTION
Along with City Attorney Magnuson, staff is preparing a letter to the DNR. In the letter the
City Council will request formal consideration of the allowance of bicycles on specific areas of
the preserve as well as indication of our willingness to enter into land use agreements for
existing trails, parking lot and proposed kiosks. Accompanying the letter will be specific
language proposed by the City and a draft Agreement the City will propose to the Stillwater
Mountain Bike Team. It is anticipated the City Council will take formal action on the item at
their January 6th meeting. If the Council determines the letter should be signed and sent, staff
will formalize the letter and the two agreements (one between the City and the DNR as well as
the other between the City and the Mountain Bike Team).
In the event the DNR is favorable to amending the easement and management plan, City staff
will reschedule the public hearing for the mountain bike park with the Parks and Recreation
Commission. As the improvements, maintenance and management of the mountain bike park
would require a use agreement, the City Council will also need to hold a public hearing. This
would be scheduled after the Parks and Recreation Commission hold their hearing.
Page 2 of 2