HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-06-03 HPC Packetiliwater
T H E B I R T H P L A C E O F MINNESOTA
Agenda
Heritage Preservation Commission
Notice of Meeting
Monday, June 3, 2013
The regular meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission will begin at 7:00 p.m., Monday,
June 3, 2013, in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater
MN 55082.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF May 6, 2013 MINUTES
3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address
subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take
action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the
concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or
less.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.01 Case No. DEM/2013 -29. A demolition request for a garage located at 208 Chestnut Street West
in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Mark Balay, representing Richard Dirnberger, applicant.
6. DESIGN REVIEWs
6.01 Case No. DR/2012 -29. Design review of a new garage with 2nd floor living space and sunroom
located at 208 Chestnut Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Mark Balay, representing
Richard Dirnberger, applicant.
6.02 Case No. DR/2013 -30. Design review of signage and fagade trim for PUB 112 located at 112
Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Sam Leon, applicant.
6.03 Case No. DR/2013 -31. Design review of the Lowell Park public restrooms located at 204 Nelson
Street East in the PROS, Park, Recreation or Open Space District. Larson Architects, Brian Larson,
applicant.
6.04 Case No. DR/2013 -32. Design review of signage for Brines located at 1790 Washington Avenue
in the BP -I, Business Park Industrial District. JC Signs and Graphics, applicant.
6.05 Case No. DR/2013 -33. Design review of rehabilitation of fagade elements on the Historic
Courthouse located at 101 Pine Street West in the PA, Public Administration District. Chad Parkos, Parkos
Construction, applicant.
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. OTHER BUSINESS
9. ADJOURNMENT
1\■iatet:
INF IINTIPLACF Of NINNFIOTN
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
May 6, 2013
7:00 P.M.
Chairman Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Chairman Lieberman, Commissioners Brach, Goodman, Johnson, Krakowski, Larson,
Council Representative Menikheim
Absent: Commissioner Zahren
Staff: Community Development Director Turnblad, Interim City Planner Douglas
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Possible approval of April 3, 2013 meeting minutes
Motion by Commissioner , seconded by Commissioner to approve the minutes of the April 3, 2013
meeting. All in favor.
DISCUSSION OF CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
Commissioner Johnson noted that candidates were interviewed by Commissioners Johnson and Larson,
Chairman Lieberman, and a Council representative.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to recommend that the reappointment of
John Brach and the appointment of Elizabeth Welty to the Heritage Preservation Commission. All in favor.
OPEN FORUM
There were no public comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
DESIGN REVIEWS
Case No. DR/2012 -41. Design review of an awning for Osaka Express located at 108 Main Street North in the
CBD, Central Business District. North Star Sign applicant; and Case No. DR/2013 -17. Design review of
signage and facade repair for Osaka Asian Bistro located at 108 Main Street North in the CBD, Central
Business District. Sean Flynn, applicant. Continued from the April 3, 2013 meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to table the application for Case No.
DR/2013 -17, signage and facade repair for Osaka Asian Bistro located at 108 Main Street North, and accept the
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
withdrawal of the application for Case No. DR/2012 -41, an awning for Osaka Express located at 108 Main
Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -23. Design review of a patio for outside seating located at 116 Main Street South (Quick
Fire Pizza) in the CBD, Central Business District. Ryan Lettner, applicant.
The applicant explained that he is requesting design review and approval for a new exterior patio for
Quickfire Pizza behind the building at 116 Main Street S. The proposed patio location is surrounded on
three sides by existing buildings. The patio will seat 26 -30 and be a stamped- concrete patio. Soft lights are
planned under the pergola. Drainage will be directed to an existing storm sewer. The fire pit shown on the
plans was not approved by the Fire Marshall and is no longer part of the project.
Chairman Lieberman commented the patio will enhance the business.
Community Development Director Turnblad said the Planning Commission will discuss the special use
permit, sound, lighting and other issues.
Commissioner Johnson commented that he would want to avoid spotlights.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve the patio for outside
seating located at 116 Main Street South (Quick Fire Pizza) in the CBD, Central Business District as
conditioned with additional conditions that there be no open fire pits, any gas lights be approved by the Fire
Chief, and construction shall not start until completion of painting on the front of the building as requested by
staff. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -19. Design review of internally - illuminated sign for Famous Footwear located at 1871
Market Drive in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District. Anchor Signs, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman reviewed the staff report. The proposed sign will replace the existing sign on the front
elevation. The sign will state "Famous Footwear" in red acrylic individual letters. A square red and white
logo, about 8 square feet in area, will precede the lettering. The total sign dimensions are 30 feet 6 inches
wide by 34 inches tall with 86.32 square feet in area. The sign will be internally illuminated. Staff
recommends approval as conditioned.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to approve the sign for Famous
Footwear located at 1871 Market Drive in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District. All in favor.
CHAMBER PRESENTATION
Ambience Opportunities in Downtown Stillwater - Chamber Downtown Revitalization Committee
Todd Streeter, Executive Director of the Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce explained that downtown
Stillwater is economically and physically decaying. The Downtown Revitalization Committee was created
to find ways to upgrade the look, function and economics of downtown. He introduced Rich Cummings, a
member of the Ambience Committee.
Mr. Cummings presented ideas for enhancing downtown ambience, in conjunction with upcoming changes
involved with the Browns Creek Trail coming in from the north, the lift bridge closing, and construction of a
new bridge. He discussed opportunities for lighting the lift bridge, historic buildings and churches, trees,
Page 2 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
stairways, the Staples Mill chimney, and possibly the stone bluffs to give downtown a warmer, more
welcoming feel. He also said the City's signage ordinance is confusing and should be updated.
Commissioner Johnson noted that lighting involves not only street lighting, but also the shops' interior
lighting. Many of the opportunities for lighting enhancement would be up to private owners to install and
maintain lights.
Commissioner Larson said he likes the notion of lighting the Staples Mill chimney and the pedestrian plaza
in front of Staples Mill.
Chairman Lieberman said the City definitely needs to improve lighting, and cautioned to use lighting
judiciously to create drama, but not overlight.
Mr. Cummings responded that the technology of LED lighting has changed dramatically; it is better able to
be controlled, inexpensive and easy to install. He addressed streetscaping, for instance with Highway 95
changes, will there be an opportunity to widen sidewalks to provide space for more benches, outdoor dining
and trees? The Committee also wants to make sure the sidewalks are cleaned and maintained, summer and
winter. He presented slides showing ideas from other communities around the country.
Chairman Lieberman commented that he doesn't want downtown Stillwater to be overrun with big box
stores, but what if some well -run national companies start thinking about small box stores? How would we
as a Commission think about that because we have been very reluctant over the years to have national
entities come into town because we fear we'll lose what's unique about Stillwater. We have to allow
businesses to maintain their identity.
Commissioner Johnson responded there's a lot of flexibility in the large windowfronts that are underutilized
by downtown businesses, and there needs to be more emphasis on what is effective signage within the
ordinance. He is a little concerned about looking at large scale signage when it's the historic architecture of
the buildings that's the primary feature.
Mr. Cummings said it's not just street signs, but also park entrance signs, signs indicating the Birthplace of
Minnesota, and historic landmark signs that should be considered.
Mr. Streeter informed the Commission that the Downtown Revitalization Committee has submitted a
proposal to the Stillwater Area Foundation with respect to a great ideas competition that would embrace our
history and utilize local organizations to bring forth the Medallion Project, which involves a two -foot
diameter medallion to be placed in strategic places downtown in the sidewalk. The Chamber will work with
the Historical Society and the City to identify opportunities to place the medallions and to ask for
organizations, businesses, and individuals to sponsor the medallions. The medallions could also tie in with
the podcast project.
Commissioner Johnson noted that trash containers downtown are unsightly - this has been a topic for years.
Commissioner Goodman noticed there's no marker showing where the old McKusick Mill was (Main and
Myrtle), no marker on the hill by McKusick Lake showing where the flue that operated the mill was. There
are a lot of existing buildings that have an interesting history but there is no signage indicating this.
Councilmember Menikheim noted this is expanding the Commission's duties beyond preserving what is still
here to preserving what was.
Page 3 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
DESIGN REVIEWS continued
Case No. DR/2013 -20. Design review of rooftop exhaust and make -up at the American Legion located at 101
Third Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Russell Allen, representing the American Legion,
applicant.
Chairman Lieberman reviewed the staff report. The applicant requests design review and approval for
rooftop venting and mechanical equipment to serve a new kitchen hood required to meet minimum health
and safety codes. The existing kitchen facility is non - compliant and poses a fire hazard without proper
ventilation. The new vent and mechanical equipment will be visible from Third Street and the adjacent
property to the south. Staff recommends approval as conditioned.
Commissioner Larson asked if the applicant looked at screening. He knows it would be an additional
expense.
Commissioner Johnson added that screening also would help reduce some of the sound from the unit.
Chairman Lieberman said this is kind of a quirky building, part of the community, and putting up large and
expensive screening is contrary to what the Legion is trying to accomplish. He has no problem with it as
presented as long as it's painted to match the building.
Motion by Commissioner Lieberman, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to approve the rooftop exhaust and
make -up at the American Legion located at 101 Third Street South in the CBD, Central Business District, as
conditioned including painting the unit to blend into the building. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -24. Design review of signage and for the construction of kiosk for Papa Wheelies Surrey
Rental located at 204 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Nancy Musser, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman reviewed the staff report. The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a
seasonal kiosk and signage for Papa Wheelie's Surrey Rental at 204 Main Street N. Outdoor sales in the
Central Business District require a special use permit. The Planning Commission will review the special use
permit request at their May 13, 2013 meeting. The proposed kiosk will be on private property at the
northwest corner of Main Street North and Commercial Street on an existing concrete area adjacent to Let
There Be Light. The 7 foot by 6 foot kiosk will be present during the rental season, approximately April to
October. The kiosk will be 8 feet high, sided with grey simulated shakes and a bronze metal roof. The
proposed 2.8 foot by 3.5 foot wall sign will be located at the peak of the roof on the east side of the kiosk.
The sign area is 9.8 square feet. The sign will state "Papa Wheelie's Surrey Rental" in black and white
letters on a green and red background with black trim. The sign will also include the Papa Wheelie's logo.
Staff recommends approval as conditioned.
Nancy Musser, the applicant, said the five surreys will be stored in a nearby building at night and out during
the day. She ran the pedi -cab service the last three summers downtown. She is aware that Highway 95 is a
state highway that the surreys will have to cross. The building will be on skids and removed in October at
the end of the season.
Commissioner Larson suggested adding trim around the windows and increasing the pitch of the roof.
Page 4 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to approve the request for signage
and for the construction of kiosk for Papa Wheelies Surrey Rental located at 204 Main Street North in the CBD,
Central Business District as conditioned. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -25. Design review to replace 45 existing windows and trim for the building located at 113
Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Jeff Beissel, Beissel Window and Siding, representing
St. John's Home Corp, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman reviewed the request. The applicant is requesting design review and approval for
window and trim replacement for 113 Main Street S. The applicant is proposing to replace existing wood
frame windows and associated trim on the upper floors of the front and rear facades with aluminum single -
hung windows and trim. The windows and trim would be holly green to coordinate with the existing
awnings at street level. No changes are proposed to the window opening size. If the Commission finds
materials and colors acceptable, staff recommends approval as conditioned.
The applicant said they have been renovating elements of the building for some time. The windows will be
set back into the frames to achieve dimension. The top of the windows will be round glass on the outside
and square on the inside.
Motion by Commissioner Brach, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to approve the replacement of 45
existing windows and trim for the building located at 113 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business
District with the conditions that the color be as submitted and windows have round tops. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -28. Design review of side wall termination vent for a small batch coffee roaster located at
120 Water Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Geoff Schodde, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman noted that the applicant is requesting design review and approval for an exterior side
wall termination vent. River Moon Coffee is proposing to relocate its coffee roasting operations from the
Brick Alley to the site in conjunction with a new cafe. The proposed vent would serve the roaster. The vent
is relatively small and unobtrusive. The vent would exit through the south building wall adjacent to the trash
enclosure and patio for Leo's Malt Shop. The south wall is currently brick and stucco. Staff recommends
approval as conditioned.
Mr. Schodde stated the vent will have minimal visual impact and will be painted to match the exterior
building. He indicated that Larry Johnson, the building owner, was less concerned about visual impacts than
potential smell but that can be minimized by appropriately scheduling the roasting.
Commissioner Johnson said he would like to see as much brick remain as possible.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve side wall termination
vent for a small batch coffee roaster located at 120 Water Street in the CBD, Central Business District as
conditioned and the added condition that brick from the opening be salvaged. All in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -07. Design review of metal cast lettering spelling out Veterans Memorial attached to metal
perimeter fence of the Riverview Parking lot at the corner of Third and Pine Street in the PA Public
Administration District. Stillwater Veterans Memorial, John Kramer, applicant.
Community Development Director Turnblad explained that the proposed sign would state "Veterans
Memorial" in individual brushed bronze attached to the fence at the northwest corner of Third and Pine
Page 5 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
Streets. The letters are proposed to be attached to two aluminum channel rails matching the existing fence
color. The rails would be bolted to the fence. The proposed sign is 8 feet long, and the individual letters are
6 inches high for a total of 4 square feet in area. The sign will not be illuminated. Staff recommends
approval as conditioned.
Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Brach, to approve the metal cast lettering for the
Veterans Memorial at Third and Pine Streets in the PA, Public Administration District as conditioned. All in
favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -22. Design review to replace an existing sign for RLJ Entertainment located at 232 Main
Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Jon Masonick, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman explained that the applicant is requesting design review and approval to change the
face on an existing free - standing sign at 232 Main Street North. The existing sign was originally approved
in 1994. This approval allowed a free - standing sign up to 30 square feet in area and 6 feet in height per the
zoning ordinance. A variance was granted at that time to allow an 8 foot rather than a 15 foot setback. The
existing sign is externally illuminated by ground- mounted spot lights. Face changes were reviewed and
approved by the HPC in 2008 for Mara Mi and in 2010 for Acorn Direct. In 2010, the HPC suggested but
did not require shielding the existing sign lighting to reduce glare. The applicant is proposing a new sign
face to read "RLJ Entertainment" in blue and black letters with "Direct -to- Consumer Division" and the
address below in smaller black letters. The sign background will be white. The sign face is 33 inches high
by 66 inches wide for a total area just over 15 square feet. The sign is 70 inches tall. Staff recommends
approval as conditioned.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve replacement of the
existing sign for RLJ Entertainment located at 232 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District as
conditioned, with conditions 3 and 4 modified to require staff approval of the lighting and landscaping plan. All
in favor.
Case No. DR/2013 -26. Design review of signage for Coldwell Banker located at 2510 Curve Crest Blvd in the
BP -C, Business Park Commercial District. Signs Unlimited, applicant.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to approve signage for Coldwell Banker
located at 2510 Curve Crest Boulevard in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District as conditioned, with the
sign only on the Curve Crest side of the building. All in favor, 4 -0.
Case No. DR/2013 -27. Design review of signage for Squeeze It Juice Bar and Smoothies located at 1300
Frontage Road in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District. Albrecht Signs, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman explained the proposed sign will replace an existing sign on the south elevation. The
new sign will state "Squeeze It!" in orange channel letters on a raceway with "Juice Bar and Smoothies" in
green letters on a white oval below. The orange lettering will be 18.2 inches high and 10 feet 10.75 inches
long. The green lettering below will be just over 8 inches high and 7 feet, 10.25 inches long. Total area of
the sign is 24 square feet. The sign will be internally illuminated. Staff recommends approval as
conditioned.
Motion by Commissioner Krakowski, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to approve signage for Squeeze It
Juice Bar and Smoothies located at 1300 Frontage Road in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District as
conditioned. All in favor.
Page 6 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
OTHER BUSINESS
Discussion on the City Council's 1st reading of the Demolition Ordinance
Commissioner Johnson pointed out the wording in the recommendation might be changed to indicate a
proactive approach rather than an exception to the policy.
Community Development Director Turnblad agreed to change the wording.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to recommend the amendments to
the demolition ordinance. All in favor, 4 -0.
Lighting on Pedestrian Plaza
Commissioner Johnson commented that the lighting by the new plaza seems bright. He asked if there is
anything that can be done, possibly shielding the light.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied that Public Works is looking at the fixtures with intent
to create a warmer look.
ADA Issues
Chairman Lieberman informed the Commission that a citizen had reported the new building on Main Street
is not handicapped accessible. The handicapped - accessible entrance will be in the rear. He relayed this and
the person was not happy that those with handicaps have to enter in the rear,
Community Development Director Turnblad responded there is more than one public policy being balanced.
The rear of the building will be more attractive than the front due to the plaza and the proximity to
handicapped parking.
Resignation
Chairman Lieberman indicated he is resigning as of tonight. He intends to work on arts revitalization
downtown, also is a performing artist and needs to free up some time for performing. He believes any
commissioner can do the job he does. He encouraged the Commission to get someone who has a real
connection with downtown. He will miss the Commission terribly. He thanked the Commission for putting
up with his quirky personality and reminded that whoever takes over the chair should know that people who
appear before the Commission are nervous so make it a nice experience for them.
Commissioner Johnson thanked Chairman Lieberman for his efforts and for bringing a legal perspective and
skills especially during the difficult reviews.
Councilmember Menikheim said it takes a special person to recognize when a good thing is coming to an
end. He thanked Chairman Lieberman for his skills and dedication.
Page 7 of 8
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting May 6, 2013
Commissioner Johnson said the Commission will now need to advertise the vacancy and appoint a chair. On
request from Commissioner Johnson, Commissioner Larson agreed to be chair.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Chairman Lieberman, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting
was adjourned at 9:32 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Julie Kink
Recording Secretary
Page 8 of 8
ti 1 Iwater
T H E B I R T H P L A C E OF M I N N F S p I A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: May 30, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -29
PROPERTY OWNER: Rick Dirnberger
APPLICANT: Mark Balay, Architect
REQUEST: Demolition permit for existing detached garage and design review for
new attached garage and sunroom addition
LOCATION: 208 Chestnut Street W
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Low /Medium Density Residential
ZONING: RB - Two Family Residential
HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 3, 2013
REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
REQUEST
The applicants are requesting a demolition permit to demolish the existing detached garage
and design review and approval for a new attached garage and sunroom. The proposed
location of the additions will require a variance from the bluff setback. The Planning
Commission is scheduled to hear the variance request at their June 10, 2013. The HPC is
asked to review the request in advance of the Planning Commission to give input on the
proposed addition location relative to the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines.
DISCUSSION
Demolition Ordinance
The City of Stillwater has a demolition ordinance for the purpose of preserving
architectural and historic resources of the city applicable to structures built prior to 1945.
Because of tree cover, staff has not been able to identify the garage as existing on historic
aerial photographs but it was likely built prior to 1945. The garage is in poor repair and
lacks any distinguishing architectural or historical significange.
208 Chestnut Street W
Page 2
Design Review
The Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) design guidelines are intended to serve as a
framework to guide the design process, while allowing for individuality and creativity in
architectural design. Twenty -seven guidelines make up the NCD design manual. These
guidelines cover three general areas including Neighborhood and Streets, Building and Site,
and Architectural Detail. Staff review of the guidelines is summarized below. The applicants'
architecture also addressed the guidelines in his submittal attached to this report.
Number
Guideline
Comments
1
Massing and scale of new building should be compatible
with neighboring structures.
Mass is consistent with
neighboring structures.
2
Respect the rhythm of the streetscape.
Proposed garage setback
consistent with adjacent
properties.
3
Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street
and adjacent properties.
Proposed garage setback
consistent with adjacent
properties.
4
Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing
roofs in the neighborhood.
Adjacent properties have a
variety of roof styles. Proposed
roof on addition complements
roof design of existing home.
5
Building height should be considered in choosing roof
forms, architectural style and relating to content.
Addition maintains the existing
height of the home.
6
Building and site design should respond to natural
features.
The property is level and has no
significant natural features other
than the bluff.
7
Respect the site's natural slope in new building design:
minimize cut, fill and retaining walls.
The property is level in the area
of the addition.
8
When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their
impact.
No new retaining walls are
proposed.
9
Preserve significant trees.
One pine tree is proposed for
removal.
10
Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and
neighborhood patterns.
Proposed garage setback
consistent with adjacent
properties.
11
Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and
street front.
Proposed garage setback
consistent with adjacent
properties and minimizes impact
to mass.
12
The size and mass of the structure should be compatible
with the size of the property.
Mass is consistent with
neighboring structures.
13
Consider front porch elements in the design of infill
structures.
Not applicable.
14
Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main
building.
Proposed garage design is
compatible to main structure but
clearly a distinct addition.
208 Chestnut Street W
Page 3
Number
Guideline
Comments
15
Design and detail new construction as four -sided
architecture.
Four -sided architecture is
proposed.
16
The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale
and character to the houses of the streetscape.
Mass is consistent with
neighboring structures.
17
Building elements should be proportional to the scale and
style of the building and its context.
The addition design is intended
to complement the design of the
existing home.
18
Use architectural details to create visual interest and
support architectural style.
Architectural detailing on the
addition is consistent with the
existing home.
19
In new building design, consider appropriate materials,
textures, colors and their relationship to other buildings
of the neighborhood.
Colors and materials would
match the existing home.
20
Use masonry and stone authentically.
Concert form liner detailing will
be used at the foundation wall.
21
Locate taller portions of buildings to minimize obstruction
of sunlight to adjacent yards and rooms.
The new two -story garage is
adjacent to the garage on the
neighboring property and will
not affect sunlight to adjacent
yards and rooms.
22
Consider neighbor's views in placement and size of new
building elements.
The proposed design does not
impact views from neighboring
property.
23
Windows, balconies and decks should be located to
respect privacy of neighboring properties.
Windows are not oriented to
adjacent properties.
24
Consider using landscape elements and fences to buffer
views and maintain privacy between properties.
The privacy of adjacent
properties are not affected by
this addition.
25
Minimize the impact of exterior lighting on adjacent
properties.
Exterior lighting will meet this
guideline.
26
Design grading and impervious surface drainage to
minimize water run -off impact on neighboring properties.
Drainage from the driveway will
be better managed as a result of
this addition.
27
Contain debris and respect noise restrictions during
construction.
The applicants' architect
indicates compliance with this
guideline.
The applicants have stated that they plan to phase the project, first constructing the garage
and then later the sunroom. Phases should be discrete and result in a finished appearance
to the home and any additions. Applicants are advised that design review approval expires
after two years, and any phases after that time period will be subject to a new design
review. Any intervening changes to ordinances or design guidelines would be applicable to
the new design review.
208 Chestnut Street W
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
If the Commission finds the design, colors and materials acceptable, staff recommends approval
as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. This approval is for demolition of the existing garage and for design review to construct a
new attached garage and sunroom. Any revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC).
2. This approval is contingent upon a bluff setback variance approval by the Planning
Commission.
3. Any proposed phases should be discrete and result in a finished appearance to the
home and any additions. Phases shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner for
compliance with this requirement prior to issuance of the building permit.
4. This design review approval expires after two years, and any phases after that time
period will be subject to a new design review. Any intervening changes to ordinances or
design guidelines would be applicable to the new design review.
Attachments: Applicant's Form, Letters, Plans and Photographs
Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission
Demolition Request Application
Subject Property Address:2b& % G4 ' U (
Applicant (Please Print):
Application Number DEMO /3 Wig'
Fee /,5-0°°
Technology Fee
Escrow
Receipt Number
Parcel No.:
Address: I f (D.- '�. 'T� Telephone No.: &S (— .7/ 7 2 3S
Property Owner (if different than Applicant):
Address: X08 y vt, Telephone No.: 6SI^= -76,?-2-
Type of Structure: (=.
Age of Structure: 17a, Condition of Structure:
Intended Use of Site after Demolition:
Si. ature of Property Owner
A preapplication site visit by the City Planner or Community Development Director is required PRIOR to
submitting the application for a demolition permit. Contact the City Planner at 651- 430 -8822 to schedule a
preapplication site visit. This application must be signed by the City Planner or Community Development
Director or it will be considered incomplete and the application will be rejected.
The preapplication site visit was completed on / /
Community Dev. Director /City Planner
Subject Property Address: Type of Structure:
The above listed building /structure was built on or after January 1, 1946 or is not a historic resource as defined
by the Stillwater City Code; is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and is not a locally
designated property. Therefore, the building is approved for demolition.
Community Dev. Director /City Planner
Date
'After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period has ended,
the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the
required building permits. A building permit must be obtained from the Stillwater Building Department prior to
demolishing the structure. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project.
Form Updated Mardi 26, 2012
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No: D
Date Filed:
Fee: $50.00
(Base Fee $25.00 & Tec nol Fee $25.00)
Receipt No.:
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in
connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e.
photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be
submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period
has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to
obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project .2Oe i.id assor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Description of Project in detail
,,I► _ 1 S [V &C1
n
hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it Is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone No. 1- 30 a�7t_-
Print Contact Name( G 1
Email:
Sig natur
Property Owner
Representative
Mailing Address 110-E A-1 `1 ALE T r
City State Zi p-S l 4 Lr, ?K y-i Y•a S O )
Scz-r.
Telephone No. ��{(���
C G Print Contact Name: ' (I 4 ` )
(Required)
S:\Planning\design review permit.wpd
Email: "Ake.
Signature
: red
April 30, 2013
Mark S. Balay, RA
110 East Myrtle Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 430 -3312
5/8/13
City of Stillwater
Attn: Melissa Douglas
216 N. Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Ms. Douglas and Heritage Preservation Commission Members:
Michael E. Balay, RA
8482 Weaver Woods Place
Noblesville, Indiana 46060
(317) 845 -9402
Attached are Design Review materials for the home at 208 W. Chestnut St. The owner
has applied to the planning commission for issuance of a bluff setback variance and we
are prepared to submit to your group for a Design Review for compliance with the
Neighborhood Conservation District Guidelines prior to that meeting, at the request of
city staff.
The proposed design will remove an existing two car detached garage and replace it with
an attached two plus car garage with living space above it, with a sunroom addition on
the first floor as well. The footprint is illustrated in a diagram, because it dimensionally
defines the proposed variances. All four elevations of the proposed modifications are
provided for your review, along with conceptual floor plans for your observation.
The overall project consists of expansions attaching to the two minor elevations of the
house, while leaving the historical architectural design of the main house unaffected on
the two principally visible elevations. The project will be constructed in phases with the
first phase being the replacement of the existing garage and second phase being the
sunroom addition. The additions will match the materials of the existing house and the
color scheme as well. The manner of simple connection will identify it as a clear
supplement to the original historical design.
We ask for your review and approval of our design concept as a whole, and anticipate
continued detailing follow up with planning staff during the construction permitting
phase to monitor that we have complied fully with the concept design intent presented
here as each of the project phases proceed.
Thanks in advance for your consideration and we will are looking forward to meeting
with you and discussing the project proposed in further detail.
5/8/13
Dirnberger/ Mortimer Residence Project/ 208 W. Chestnut St.
Compliance Analysis
Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 1 -27
1) While individual in site presentation the proposed design solution is compatible
and comparable to the many large scale "bluff' homes surrounding downtown
and the river bluff.
2) The proposed garage structure is set back from the hosue to protect the historical
streetscape appearance,
3) This addition follows adjacent setbacks as a guideline.
4) Roof is designed in a matching but separate style to the house..
5) Proposed building height is appropriate to surrounding and dominate structures.
6) The proposed design responds to the geometry of Chestnut Hill neighborhood
7) Natural slope is not altered building sets on existing.
8) Retaining structures are at rear of lot and concealed by woods.
9) One pine tree must be removed but forest cover to north stays intact..
10) The proposed replacement garage is set behind the house face.
11) Position of the garage minimizes impact and roof pitches match house.
12) The proposed final size of the house is well below % of coverage of adjacent
properties due to the large size of the parcel.
13) n/a This structure is not infill.
14) n/a There is no accessory building the garage is attached.
15) This design solution presents correct detailing of all elevations with some minor
modern building code restrictions to one of the existing garage elevations
adjacent to the property line.
16) The proposed design is compatible as required to other homes on the street.
17) The proposed design is executed with correct proportion style and scale for the
historical Carpenter Gothic style.
18) The proposed architectural detailing supports the Carpenter gothic style of the
main house.
19) n/a This is not a new building
20) Concert form liner detailing at foundation wall will be similar to municipal
parking lot example.
21) Sunlight is certainly not obstructed by this proposed design based upon site.
22) The proposed design does not obstruct anymore views based upon the tree cover.
23) Privacy of adjacent properties is not affected by the proposed design.
24) Privacy is not affected.
25) All exterior lights will follow guidelines
26) This new design wil better handle and control the run -off that comes into the
driveway area by control of area drains and outflow from them on the slope
behind.
27) Will comply with all city regulations in regards to debris, noise and construction.
B
ARCHITECTS
Y
u 0 t
208 W. Chestnut 5t.
SITE PLAN
208 WEST CHESTNUT
SP
20' k'EARYA1;17 Set Pack
EXISTING FiPPt. APEA Imp/ CA-C
1,575 sr 13,198
pr0F05ED Ffpl0f, A0.EA -925 RIVE/ WALK
3,054 5F - 3,054 FT2If
EXISTING HEIGHT" 9,219 PrrVIU0S
23' -0" 3,979 IMEEEVIOUS
EpOPO502HEIGHT 30%IMPEPVIOUS
(N0 CHANGE)
LOr COVrQAGE
14 ALLOW)
80% IMEEpV10U5
LOT" COVERAGE
' 30% IMPEpVlOU5
PLUFF UNE PEp SLIMY
N
1' 'e -I5EI7 FO011'pINf
Al22IfION
30 Ff, PLUFF Lilt
55fPACK
wil
GAP.AGE
SUNEt'OM
IP
1=
Obi
V41
war
1 , 1,40
7,,,,oreto ,- MaiV i 7,
�jr
15'FKONTYAKI7 Set Pack
,� A
--
.
e
170VEWAY
5117E
ALK
i� % //d
SIrrWW.K
208 W. Chestnut 5t.
SITE PLAN
208 WEST CHESTNUT
SP
1 l ill. �qt�
CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION
CONCEPTUAL NORTH ELEVATION
1�4Io-{`. °Q(
208 WEST CHESTNUT
El
COf CEPTUAL SOUTH ELEVATION
•
•
CONCEPTUAL WEST ELEVATION
E2
ti 1 Iwater
T H E B I R T H P I A C F OF M I N N E S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
May 30, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -30
APPLICANT: Sam Leon, Leon Properties Uno, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER: Sam Leon, Leon Properties Uno, LLC
REQUEST: Design Review of painting and proposed signage for Pub 112
LOCATION: 112 Main Street N
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE: June 3, 2013
REVIEWERS: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for paint color and for two
signs for Pub 112 at 112 Main Street N. Painting would include trim and the main
entrance door. Proposed signage includes refacing the existing wall sign and adding a
new projecting sign.
DISCUSSION
Painting
The proposed trim and door colors are brown and bronze (see attached photograph).
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides that "[t]he color of buildings
should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect" and that
"colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors"
should be avoided. The proposed colors meet these guidelines.
112 Main Street N
Page 2
Wall Sign
The proposed wall sign will be set within the existing illuminated sign frame. The sign
face will measure 1 foot, 11.75 inches high by 24 feet, 0.75 inches long for a total area of
47.6 square feet. The sign face will be bronze - painted aluminum composite with a single
line of black lettering ( "Pub 112 ") with logos in black, white, red and gold on either side
of the lettering.
For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows
one square foot for each foot of building parallel to the front lot line. The applicant's
retail space is 28 feet long facing Main St N.
The total proposed sign area is over 47 square feet. The sign and illuminated frame
predates the establishment of the Downtown Historic District. In 2011, the HPC
approved a sign for Pub Monique at this location, limiting the area of the sign lettering
to 28 square feet but allowing the sign face to fill the entire frame. The current applicant
felt that reducing the lettering to 28 square feet would be out of scale with the sign
frame and has applied for a variance to the sign area. The Planning Commission will
review the variance request at their June 10, 2013 meeting.
The design guidelines for the downtown historic district recommend painted wood
using simple, bold lettering on a black, dark green or similar background with white or
gold letters. The guidelines for storefront signs state that signs should be located on the
horizontal band separating the storefront windows from the upper facade. The
storefront sign should be used to display the name of the business preferably in one
line. The proposed sign meets these recommendations in the guidelines.
Projecting Sign
The proposed projecting sign will be 33 inches by 25.75 inches with an area just under 6
square feet. The sign will include the "Pub 112" name in black and the black, white, red
and gold logo on a bronze background. The sign will be constructed of aluminum and
will be installed on a black metal bracket north of the restaurant entrance as shown on
the attached photograph. The sign will be externally illuminated.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual recognizes projecting signs as a
component of the historic streetscape, provided they are small and simple. The
guidelines encourage the use of materials consistent with the period such as wood
signboards and metal brackets.
Size and height of projecting signs are regulated by the zoning ordinance. The zoning
ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not
counted towards the total area. The zoning ordinance also states that projecting signs
must be easily visible from the sidewalk and not a hazard to pedestrians. The proposed
sign meets these requirements.
112 Main Street N
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. This approval is for trim and door painting, refacing the existing wall sign and a
new projecting sign for Pub 112. Any revisions to the approved plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC).
2. Design review approval for the wall sign as proposed is contingent upon approval
of a variance for the sign area by the Planning Commission. If the variance is not
approved, the maximum area of the lettering and logo shall not exceed 28 square
feet; however, the sign background may extend the full length of the existing sign
frame.
3. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk.
4. No additional signage without HPC approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form, Sign Plans and Photograph
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No: a 3 —
Date Filed: S if 113
Fee: $50.00
(Base Fee $25.00 & Technology Fee $25.0200)
Receipt No.:
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in
connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e.
photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be
submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period
has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to
obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
Address of Project
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Assessor's Parcel No. a$.° r(P-&,q/ O/'
6W50 /)//4/774-/Al'pi avoc
Zoning District ,i r Description of Project in detail (.JC. /f f/ 4 qn) C494 4t '
ree- '& J `d e/6 V -P - «-0 4
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
11
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner Representative
Mailing Address (Q9-! @ro4 c -fit/ f--- ii) Mailing Address ;094 aregdi' /Sf-N
City State Zip S41 /-i, /LEA) Oar,?- City State Zip c- il'it,41- MAI (rd8-
Telephone No. 6;"/ 1/q°7 0 8-? 7 Telephone No. 6.f/ 1/97 (It?,
Print Contact Name: So pi t...e0A Print Contact Name: _ trt y)
Email:,SQ acar)u)co 0, 4,co144 Email: Gang caffjc. vr'L .CPr✓i
Signature 0\A, Signature10 1 Sem
(Required) (Required)
S: \Planning \design review permit.wpd
April 30, 2013
•
2 %4 114"
24'-0 3/4"
20' -3 1/2"
Non - Illuminated
Flat Cut Out Letters and Logo
mounted to DiBond Backer then onto wall
Backer:
DiBond Backer painted
(Sheffield Bronze 12 -755 92607 to match "bronze" pms #876)
Letters and Logo:
1/2" flat cut out sintra letters and logos
painted (Sheffield Brasstone 12 -756 90353 to match "gold" pms #872)
with applied vinyl overlay
Vinyl:
black, white, red, & gold
(Sheffield Brasstone 12 -756 90353 to match "gold" pms #872)
• Esisdng Storefront
1 /2' F Cut Out
Slntra at Leiters
Aa required Threaded Stud Anchors
Anchors Anchors dhered wan Silicone
SECTION ASSEMBLY DETAIL
Typical Flat Cut Out Letters
(Flush Mounted)
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Customer. Pub 112
Address: Stillwater, MN
Sales: Kacie Lindus
PROJECT INFORMATION
Sign Type: Non - Illuminated
Flat Cut Out Letters and
Logo
Sign Size:
Mounting: flush mount
Lighting:
Face:
see details
Returns:
Retainers/
Trim Cap:
Vinyl: see details
Notes:
DRAWING INFORMATION
File Name: Pub 112 wall sign 6
Date: 3 -12 -13
Revisross: 3 -26 -13
3 -27 -13
4 -9 -13
4 -16 -13
Sc,ae: 1/2" = 1' -0" at 11" x 17"
Page: 1 of 1
Designer: Jeff Weispfenning
Customer/
LL Approval:
(signarrt
SignArt Company
Eau Claire, WI
715-834-5127
80o- 235 -5178
St. Paul, MN
651- 688 -0563
80o- 699 -0563
www.signartusa.com usTEo
This drawing was created to asset you In visualizing our
proposal. It Is the property of Spn M Company and
may not be used or reproduced by others.
Externally Illuminated with goose neck lamps
D/F Blade Sign
mounted to hanging bracket
Sign Body:
Fabricated 2" internal structure with .125" aluminum faces and returns,
painted (Sheffield Brasstone 12 -756 90353 to match "gold" pms #872)
(2) Faces:
.125" aluminum faces with attached FCO graphics
painted (Sheffield Bronze 12 -755 92607 to match "bronze" pms #876)
Letters, Logo 8 Border:
3/4" painted Flat Cut Out Sintra letters, logo and border
with applied vinyl opaque overlay
(To match drawing)
Vinyl:
black, white, red, 8 gold
(Sheffield Brasstone 12 -756 90353 to match "gold" pms #872)
Bracket Support:
2" square tube supports with standard gusset and base plates
Attaches to brick wall with standard hardware
Sign Code:
Maximum Sign Area: 6 sq. ft.
Proposed Sign Area: 6 sq. ft.
profile
Bracket Support:
2" square tube supports with standard gusset and base plate.
Attaches to brick wall with standard hardware.
(1 each side) typical Gooseneck Lamps on each side illuminate sign.
0)
fV
Proposed Blade Sign Location i
-2V-
-3 1 /2)—
Sign Area:
6 sq. ft.
CUSTOMER INFORMATION
Customer: Pub 112
Address: Stillwater, MN
Sales: Kacie Lindus
PROJECT INFORMATION
Sign Type Externally Illuminated
Blade Sign with FCO
Letters, Logo and
Sign Size: Border
Mounting: bracket mount
Lighting: external gooseneck
lamps
Face:
Retums: see details
Retainers/
Trim Cap: see details
Vinyl: see details
DRAWING INFORMATION
File Name: Pub 112 blade sign 6
Date: 3 -12 -13
Revisions: 3 -26 -13
4 -16 -13
4 -25-13
5 -8 -13
Scale: 1 1/2" = 1' -0" at 11" x 17"
Page: 1 of 1
Designer: Jeff Weispfenning
Customed
.1 Approval:
SignArt Company
Eau Claire, WI
715-834-5127
Soo - 235-5178
St. Paul, MN
651- 688 -0563
800- 699 -0563
www.signartusa.com
LISTED
This drawing was created to assist you in oisualinng our
proposal. It is to property of Sign M Company and
may not be used or reproduced by others.
• . , •
;1/24'. -4 " • '
i11watr
(HE B I R T H P L A C E OE M I N N E S O T A -I
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: May 30, 2013
APPLICANT: City of Stillwater
CASE NO.: 2013 -31
REQUEST: Design Review for new public restrooms in south Lowell Park
LOCATION: 204 Nelson Street E
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Park, Recreation or Open Space
ZONING: PROS - Park, Recreation and Open Space
HPC DATE: June 3, 2013
REVIEWERS: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
BACKGROUND
The City of Stillwater is proposing to rebuild the existing restroom in south Lowell
Park. The restroom is connected to the sanitary sewer lift station to the south. The lift
station was constructed in 1959 while the restroom was constructed in 1984. The
existing restroom has two stalls in both the men and women restrooms. The restroom is
at the end of it useful life and suffers from water intrusion issues.
To construct the new restroom, setback variances were necessary from the Saint Croix
River and floodplain requirements. HPC design review was required as a condition of
variance approval. The variance approval also required:
• Landscaping shall be added along the east side of the building to minimize the visual impact
of the structure from the St Croix River.
• The building shall use earth tone colors.
• All utilities along with all ground and roof top mounted mechanical equipment
must be screened from public view.
• All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. must match the color of the adjacent surface.
• A lighting plan and cut sheets on all of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted and approved
by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit.
204 Nelson Street E
Page 2
REQUEST
The new building will be 24 feet by 30 feet with five stalls in each restroom. The east
wall of new restroom will be located in the same location as the current wall and will
still connect to the lift station to the south. The current restroom has a finish floor of
685.90 feet. To avoid water intrusion, the new restroom will have a finished floor
elevation of 689.27 feet. The building will be constructed of brick with a pitched metal
roof. The new roof would extend over the lift station for continuity. Roundtop windows with
brick accents are proposed along the west and east elevations to give detail and interest to the
facade.
Existing Restroofn
DISCUSSION
7IIMMIIII1 Sanitary Sewer 7
Lift Station
The restroom building is isolated from other structures. Many design guidelines relate
infill buildings to adjacent structures so are not applicable to this project. Relevant
guidelines in the Design Manual for the Commercial Historic District include:
• Roofs should be flat or gently pitched.
• Infill architecture should reflect some of the detailing of surrounding buildings in
window shape, cornice lines and brick work.
• Infill buildings should be composed of materials similar to original adjacent facades
(local brick or stone).
204 Nelson Street E
Page 3
• New buildings should not stand out against the others but be compatible with the
general area.
• The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent building colors to create a
harmonious effect.
• The color of brick or other natural building material should dictate the color family
choice.
RECOMMENDATION
If the Commission finds the design, colors and materials acceptable, staff would
recommend approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. This approval is for design review for new public restrooms at the south end of
Lowell Park. Any revisions to the approved plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC).
2. All conditions of the variance approval shall remain in effect.
3. Any proposed signage requires review and approval by the HPC.
attachments: Applicant's Form and Plans
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
• 216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No:
Date Filed:
Fee: $50.00
(Base Fee $25.00 & Tec nology Fee $25.00)
Receipt No.: —
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in
connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e.
photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be
submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period
has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to
obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
VI* es NeuvaJ
neAr Address of Project 7g Strx Assessor's Parcel No. 03 ao - / / 00A / f
Project extol I�ilcnmex a� � �J
Zoning District s Description of Project in detail Veimoki *iolA 0Eey -iki ? b1icta ciS
°k41 s Calarnekoirwe.- ivx e-AtiAlA towpt({t , asni cn,kuc of v•UUL
•
Vb``{vli.G4c \POM iv d Sit iVA r-arvurANIS
7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not proPerty owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner
c•t�rt of stlu.wE �z...
Mailing Address Zito N..tkrseat.
City State Zip G lkt. t 90
Telephone No. (e'51. 2115 • it 102.
Print Contact Name: TIM ‘4499-e-
Email: A- vtlyoore @Gt •416ti . Vth • J5,
Signature
(Required)
s: \Pianning\design review permitwpd
Representative
Mailing Address L t..t..�
so7- NI •4
City State Zip 4W 1trT Mk, 550 .
Telephone No. _ 651 4220 • Cv
Print Contact Name: 4341A14 Lhe -5o■
Email: dria.h llki avdnaeck'Slk,C
Signature
(Required)
April 30, 2013
Design Narrative
South Lowell Park Bathroom Reconstruction
Stillwater Minnesota
June 3rd 2013
Larson Architects, LLC
The site of the proposed Bathroom Reconstruction is located at the south end of Lowell Park,
between a City parking lot to the west and the river to the east. The proposed building will
replace the existing toilet facilities adjacent to the existing City Pumphouse at this location. The
City Pumphouse was built in 1958, and the toilet addition in 1984, designed by Mike McGuire with
SEH.
The new bathrooms will be about 716 square feet in area, approximately twice the size of the
existing. The building includes 5 toilets and 3 lavatories at the Women's side, and 3 toilets and 2
urinals at the Men's side. There will be a small utility room with mop sink, exterior drinking
fountains, and an exterior electrical panel on the West side for special event use. The area near
the building, including the adjacent City parking lot, will be raised in elevation as part of the City
Levee project. The floor level of the new building will match the floor level of the existing
pumphouse, which is about three feet above the current restroom building floor elevation.
Goals for the new building are to make it a relatively low- profile building, with improved daylight
from obscure tempered glass, and mechanical ventilation. The interior surfaces will include tile or
glazed block, and solid plastic partitions.
The building exterior will be a brick similar to the existing pumphouse. There will be a brick detail
recess creating a subtle visual break between the existing and new buildings. The gable roof will
be a warm gray standing seam metal, at a similar pitch as the nearby Freight House building roof;
with an overall height about 17' -6 ". The roof is intended to extend over the existing pumphouse
roof, with a brick gable with a vent detail at both ends. Windows will have brick rowlock or
architectural precast arched headers, with aluminum or steel frames and mullions and obscure
ribbed glass. At the north end, facing the park, a steel- framed canopy will extend to provide
shelter over the entrances and a small paved area. Exterior lighting will be under the canopy
and shielded from direct view. The Restroom building will be connected with a paved walkway to
the adjacent parking lot and existing walkway in the park.
•..� 2
-n - • 4011111116111
EXISTING SITE PHOTOS SOUTH LOWELL PARK BATHROOMS
LARSON
4RCHITECTS
Na Fourth 6nm
Stillwater. TIN 55081
651 - 430 -0056
IarrnatcNm't.il:. mm
1-Itt 441E5c
•Sel4EME
LoWEST RCIF
Se-REMC
1
-
a FM Fib 61447E
NEW paaser, 62.Ave
(V/1644EP)
NEW
Esrmob BATt4lecoWIS
2.•C %MS& rtWflial
op;n4t-com4 (gwAked)
EXISTING BUILDING SOUTH LOWELL PARK BATHROOMS
FLOOR PLAN
SOUTH LOWELL PARK BATHROOMS
LARSON
Sti1J%v ,=07,., •
651 - 43 1 • 0056
lannnuchiter.k.
SCHEME E
SOUTH LOWELL PARK BATHROOMS
LARSON
ARCHITECTS
iliwater
T H E K R T H P A C F O F M N N E O A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
May 30, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -32
PROPERTY OWNER: Jim Moscowitz
APPLICANT: James Cota, JC Signs & Graphics
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Brine's Market and ESR
LOCATION: 1754 -1790 Washington Avenue
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C - Commercial
ZONING: BP -C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE: June 3, 2013
REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
REQUEST
The subject property is within the West Business Park design review district. The
applicant is requesting design review and approval for a new, shared free - standing sign
at 1754 -1790 Washington Avenue for Brine's Market and ESR, Eastern Suburban
Resources.
DISCUSSION
The proposed sign will include two sign panels. The top panel will be for Brine's
Market and will include "Brine's" in red letters at the top of the sign and "Est. 1958"
and "Full Service Market, Deli, Fresh Meats and Catering" in black. The panel
background will be tan. This panel will measure 4 feet high by 8 feet long.
The second, lower panel will be for ESR, Eastern Suburban Resources. All lettering on
this panel will be black with purple graphic accents. The sign will state "ESR Works!"
and "Eastern Suburban Resources Your Partners for Success in Employment and
Community ". The panel background is white. This panel will measure 1.5 feet high by 8
feet long.
1754 -1790 Washington Avenue
Page 2
The total sign area will be 44 square feet. The two panels will be mounted between two
brick pillars. The total sign height is proposed to be 8 feet, 2 inches. The sign will be
internally illuminated.
The West Business Park design standards state that commercial signs shall be consistent
with the requirements in the zoning ordinance. The design standards also state that a
landscaped area of bushes or flowers equal to twice the sign area shall be provided
around the base of the sign. The zoning ordinance allows up to 100 square feet of sign
area for free - standing signs in the business park districts. A setback of 15 feet from all
property lines is required. The maximum allowed height is 6 feet. One free - standing
sign is permitted per development site.
The area of the proposed sign is 44 square feet, which meets the requirements of the
zoning ordinance. The proposed height exceeds the height allowed by the zoning
ordinance. As a condition of approval, the height must be reduced to no more than 6
feet. A landscaping plan is also required as a condition of approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. This approval is for a new, shared free - standing sign for Brine's Market and ESR,
Eastern Suburban Resources. Any revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC).
2. The sign shall be setback at least 15 feet from all property lines.
3. Sign height shall be reduced to no more than 6 feet.
4. A landscaping plan showing at least 88 square feet of bushes and flowers around the
sign base shall be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner before the
Design Review Permit or the Sign Permit will be issued. Landscaping shall be
installed within 30 days of sign installation and shall be maintained for the life of the
sign.
attachments: Applicant's Form and Sign Plans
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No: D —'
Date Filed: S,
Fee: $50.00
(Base Fee $25.00 & T logy Fee $25.00)
Receipt No.:°7,
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in
connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e.
photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be
submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period
has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to
obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY I ENTIFICATION
Address of Project / J 9 0 (,�� sit; el o karcei No.
Zoning District P"" Description of Project in detail
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. 1 further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property `` '� r Qwner Representative
Mailing Address 3 � 30 t �ar 1e Mailing Address 26 ccv,due _ Id,
City State Zip p(Yvtot4& J J 5- 59Y7City State Zip ' o fey, 1 OEi 54;322
y�
Telephone No. 7‘,3 52-5 - 7 S Telephone No. 22 Y — y/Y/
Print Contact Name: 3 i A /\IGSCOc.vi'f" Print Contact Name:
Email: Email: � i ti . , J (_ .51_511 S , C U-�
Signature Signature
(Required) i.7 (Required)
S: \Planning \design review permit.wpd
April 30, 2013
LIT CABINET W/ VINYL GRAPHICS
4' 0'
1' 6"
2' 8"
too
014...gat.:11
.V.PrMKP,
Nifio0:t4P,14,
OA,
-L 20"
8' 0"
0'6"
2' 2
EST. 1958 -;
FULL SERVICE MARKET DELI
FRESH MEATS CATERING
ES Eastern Suburban Resources
Your Partners for Success in
Works! Employment and Community
7' 1"
MEM
aigiaqtr
OK:
;L'AWONSC
(13,--- 2 0"
1- 2' 0" -IF
—4)-0' 3"
JOB NAME Bale's Stillwater APPROVED SY:
20 SECOND AVENLJ W5ST FOLEY
REVISION DATE: 1 0/08/1 2 SALESMAN: James Cota FILE NAME: i
Br nes-01 ,CDR
N 56329 P:(320) 968-4444 F 2 ) 96 4447
FLOURESCENT BULBS
0' 9 -112"
4,
0' 9 -112"
4,
0' 9.112"
4,
0' 9 -112"
4,
0' 9 -112"
4'
0
0
0
0
0
JOB NAME le'S Stillwater APPROVED BY:
REVISION DATE: 10/08/1 2 SALESMAN: James Cot() FILE NAME: Brines-01 CDR
20 E C ON
AVE N
EY
��
6 ; „ 0 968 -4447
ti 1 Iwater
T H E H 1 R T H R ; A ? : F O F NI S N N E S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: May 30, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -33
PROPERTY OWNER: Washington County
APPLICANT: Chad Parkos, Parkos Construction
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed flashing, soffit and fascia restoration
LOCATION: 101 Pine Street W
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Institutional
ZONING: PA - Public Administration
HPC DATE: June 3, 2013
REVIEWER: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
BACKGROUND
The Historic Washington County Courthouse at 101 Pine Street W is listed on the
National Register of Historic Places. Design review is required by city ordinance for any
remodel, alteration or repair of a historic building or site.
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for restoration of flashing,
soffits and fascia. Detailed plans and photographs of the scope of work are attached.
The contractor will be available for questions at the HPC meeting.
DISCUSSION
The Design Manual for the Commercial Historic District provides guidelines
for restoration and rehabilitation from the Secretary of Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation. This section states, "Deteriorated architectural features should be
repaired rather than replaced whenever possible. In the event of replacement, new
101 Pine Street W
Page 2
materials should match the original in composition, design, color, texture and
appearance." The restoration plans and specifications appear to be consistent with this
guideline.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. Any revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission (HPC).
attachments: Plans and Photographs
32 33 34 31
35
13
ROOF PLAN
FOR P-1OTO REFERENCE
16 18 17
14
11 15
NO SCALE
19 20
47 46 43 44 45
41
42
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ISSUED:
DESCRIPTION
WOOD AND ROOFING RESTORATION
PLOTTED:
11 -02 -2012
FILE NAME:
Al .3_041 1.dwg
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND T.• AM A Y LI NSED
ARCHITECT IN T T• • /,Ig'S•
SIGNATURE
DATE
REGISTRATION 15840
MBER
, 2012
I =�
❑ERTEL ARCHITECTS
1795 SAINT CLAIR AVE. / ST. PAUL, MN 55105
(651) 696 -5186 / (651) 696 -5188 FAX
www.oertelarchitects.com
SHEET NO.
A1.1
CAREFULLY REMOVE
EXISTING MORTAR AT
TOP OF SHEET METAL
ROOFING / FLASHING
NOTE=
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
ARE APPROXIMATE
FIELD VERIFY DIMS.
CAREFULLY REMOVE
EXISTING SHEET METAL
ROOFING / FLASHING
CAREFULLY REMOVE
EXISTING SHEET METAL
ROOFING / FLASHING
2' -71 FIELD VERIFY
FLAT ROOF ABOVE CORNICE
EXISTING CONDITION - REMOVAL 3" =1' -0R
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ISSUED:
DESCRIPTION:
WOOD AND ROOFING RESTORATION
PLOTTED:
11 -02 -2012
FILE NAME:
details.dwg
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND T. AM A 5, -Y NSED
ARCHITECT IN
SIGNATURE
DATE
REGISTRATION 15840
I ='
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
1795 SAINT CLAIR AVE. / ST. PAUL, MN 55105
(651) 696 -5186 / (651) 696 -5188 FAX
www.oertelarchltects.com
SHEET NO.
A6.1
CAREFULLY FIT NEW SHEET METAL
ROOFING INTO EXISTING REGLET
(INSERT INTO FULL BED OF SEALANT,
SEAL TOP EDGE AFTER EMBEDMENT)
WRAP SELF— ADHERING MEMBRANE
UNDERLAYMENT UP BRICK TO
BOTTOM OF REGLET
21 -7" FIELD VERIFY
2 PIECE SHEET METAL ROOFING
(INSTALL CLIPS TO SECURE AS
NECESSARY, HEM ALL JOINTS)
SELF — ADHERING MEMBRANE
UNDERLAYMENT
i" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD
SHEATHING OVER WOOD BLOCKING AS
REQUIRED
Lu
is
FLAT ROOF ABOVE CORNICE
REPAIRED CONDITION 51:=1' -0"
WRAP
SELF — ADHERING
MEMBRANE
UNDERLAYMENT
DOWN OVER NEW
TO EXISTING
JOINT
DRIP EDGE
SECURE EDGE
WITH CONCEALED
CLIPS AND
FASTENERS
NOTE:
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
ARE APPROXIMATE
FIELD VERIFY DIM'S,
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ISSUED:
DESCRIP110N:
WOOD AND ROOFING RESTORATION
PLOTTED:
11 -02 -2012
FILE NAME:
details.dwg
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND AM A -Y NSED
ARCHITECT IN • /s
(110 is ER
SIGNATURE
DATE
REGISTRATION 15840
2012
I '
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
1795 SAINT CLAIR AVE. / ST. PAUL, MN 55105
(651) 696-5186 / (651) 696-5188 FAX
www.oertelarchitects.com
SHEET NO.
A6.2
EAVE EDGE AT ROOF PERIMETER
EXISTING CONDITION 3" =1' -0"
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ISSUED:
DESCRIPTION:
WOOD AND ROOFING RESTORATION
PLOTTED:
11 -02 -2012
FILE NAME:
details.dwg
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND AM A r Y NSED
ARCHITECT IN • rm..,
SIGNATURE
DATE
REGISTRATION I5&4 '
NOTE:
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
ARE APPROXIMATE
FIELD VERIFY DIM'S.
CAREFULLY BEND UP EDGE
OF SHEET METAL ROOFING
(TO ALLOW FOR NEW
FLASHING TO BE SET)
CAREFULLY REMOVE
EXISTING NAILS AT
BOTTOM EDGE OF
SHEET METAL ROOF
(FASCIA)
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
1795 SAINT CLAIR AVE. / ST. PAUL, MN 55105
(651) 696 -5186 / (651) 696 -5188 FAX
www.oertelarchitects.com
SHEET NO.
A6.3
CAREFULLY FILL ALL
HOLES AT END OF
STANDING SEAM WITH
SEALANT
i
FLAT ROOF ABOVE CORNICE
REPAIRED CONDITION 3" =1' -0"
NOTE=
EXISTING DIMENSIONS
ARE APPROXIMATE
FIELD VERIFY DIM'S.
CAREFULLY BEND DOWN
EDGE OF SHEET METAL
ROOFING (AFTER NEW
FLASHING HAS BEEN SET
IN PLACE)
NEW SHEET METAL
FLASHING SET UP
UNDER EXISTING METAL
ROOFING
SECURE NEW FLASHING
AND EXISTING ROOFING
EDGE WITH COLOR
MATCHED GASKETED
SCREWS SET IN
EXISTING NAIL HOLES
WASHINGTON COUNTY HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ISSUED:
DESCRIPTION:
WOOD AND ROOFING RESTORATION
PLOTTED:
11 -02 -2012
FILE NAME:
detaile.dwg
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND . AM A i_ Y NSED
ARCHITECT IN
SIGNATURE
DATE
REGISTRATION 15840'
/ ='
OERTEL ARCHITECTS
1795 SAINT CLAIR AVE / ST. PAUL, MN 55105
(651) 696 -5186 / (651) 696 -5188 FAX
www.oertelarchitects.com
SHEET NO.
A6.4
Washington County Historic Courthouse
General Notes that apply to bid documents:
Bid is to include:
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
1. Removal of all existing nails, installing new roof edge counter - flashing, and installing new
gasketed screws at entire perimeter of existing standing seam metal roof. Reference A6.3
and A6.4 for typical details. (Included in Quantity of Restoration)
2. Reference Quantity of Restoration work page, attached, for quantities to bid.
3. Reference photograph below for vocabulary used in Quantity of Restoration page.
4. Reference unlabeled photographs included at the end of document for typical conditions
which show sizes of detailing (based on tape measure).
Existing Nail Holes
Roof Edge
Crown
Fascia
Bracket Trim
Tongue & Groove Soffit
1
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
2
Replace entire crown molding on this
face. Aprox 14'. Attach molding with
stainless steel trim screws. Fill screw
holes with sealant.
Reattach loose fascia boards that are
in good condition with stainless steel
screws.
Caulk open joints in soffit
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood. Sand all weathered wood
to bright new wood. Consolidate
wood at outer 2 -3" with epoxy
where wood is soft. Reattach
molding with stainless steel screws
where needed and fill with
sealant.
3
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood. Sand all weathered wood
to bright new wood. Consolidate
wood at outer 2 -3" with epoxy
where wood is soft. Reattach
molding with stainless steel screws
where needed and fill with
sealant.
As noted above, this entire run
replaced with new crown.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
4
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood. Sand all weathered wood
to bright new wood. Consolidate
wood at outer 2 -3" with epoxy
where wood is soft. Reattach
molding with stainless steel screws
where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. refill
with sealant after molding has
been reattached with stainless
steel screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Replace entire crown molding on
this face. Aprox 14'. Attach molding
with stainless steel trim screws. Fill
screw holes with sealant.
5
Replace missing section of
roofing /flashing with custom made
piece of same material and gauge.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
6
Remove paint at end 8 -10" of crown
molding. Consolidate that area with epoxy
and repair area to original profile with
thickened epoxy.
At frieze board, remove protruding nails and
refasten board to existing sub framing with
stainless steel screws. Fill screw holes with
sealant.
Verify new sheet metal roofing as covered
hole at junction with roof. Caulk entire joint
at bottom edge with frieze board
Restoration November 2, 2012
At frieze board, remove protruding nails
and refasten board to existing sub
framing with stainless steel screws to
flatten board. Fill screw holes with
sealant.
After frieze board has been reattached,
remove old paint and any filler in crack
at bottom of frieze board and fill and
smooth with thickened epoxy.
7
Remove and replace min. 3' section of
fascia board. Scrape paint off of end 4-
6" at adjacent fascia board and
consolidate all soft wood, especially end
grain at repair location.
Remove and replace aprox. 3' of lx T &G
soffit board at this location. Carefully
remove upper trim at brackets as
necessary without damaging adjacent
surfaces, by carful prying or cutting nails
to allow for full removal and
replacement of soffit board. Verify
condition of sub framing and repair
where necessary. Make splice of T &G
board under bracket. Reinstall trim with
similar technique as original.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
PHOTO # 14
8
Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright new
wood. Consolidate wood at outer 6 -8"
with epoxy where wood is soft.
Reattach molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. refill with
sealant after molding has been
reattached with stainless steel screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Scrape paint off of end 12 -18" at t
fascia board and consolidate all soft
wood, especially end grain at repair
location. Fill areas with thickened
epoxy to bring to smooth condition.
Remove and replace aprox. 3' of outer
most 1x T &G soffit board at this
location. Cut back to bracket and
attempt to have joint under bracket
molding. Verify condition of adjacent
board after removal
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
9
Scrape bubbled and blistered paint off
of end between brackets and
consolidate all soft wood, especially
end grain. This area seems to be solid
despite paint condition and
appearance of water intrusion. Fill
areas with thickened epoxy to bring to
smooth condition.
TYPICAL AT ALL ROOF EAVE EDGES.
Fill holes /gaps at end of standing
seam to eliminate water intrusion
from top surface of roofing onto
crown molding.
Replace all nails at end of roof panels
with screws after new counterflashing
is installed.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
10
TYPICAL AT ALL CHIMNEY TO ROOF
TRANSITIONS.
Fill holes /gaps at standing seam to
roof panel transitions to eliminate
water intrusion.
Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright
new wood. Consolidate wood at outer
6 -8" with epoxy where wood is soft.
Reattach molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. Refill with
sealant after molding has been
reattached with stainless steel screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright
new wood. Consolidate wood at outer
6 -8" with epoxy where wood is soft.
Reattach molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. Refill with
sealant after molding has been
reattached with stainless steel screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Reattach fascia board with stainless
steel screws and seal remaining joint
at soffit to fascia intersection.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Remove and replace aprox. 3' of 1x T &G
soffit board at this location. Carefully
remove upper trim at brackets as
necessary without damaging adjacent
surfaces, by carful prying or cutting nails
to allow for full removal and
replacement of soffit board. Verify
condition of sub framing and repair
where necessary. Make splice of T &G
board under bracket. Reinstall trim with
similar technique as original.
Remove and replace min. 3' section of
fascia board. Scrape paint off of end 4-
6" at adjacent fascia board and
consolidate all soft wood, especially end
grain at repair location.
12
Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright new
wood. Consolidate wood at outer 6 -8"
with epoxy where wood is soft.
Reattach molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. refill with
sealant after molding has been
reattached with stainless steel screws.
Scrape fascia board and consolidate
with epoxy if wood is soft.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
13
Scrape bubbled and blistered paint off
of end between brackets and
consolidate all soft wood, especially
end grain. This area seems to be solid
despite paint condition and
appearance of water intrusion. Fill
areas with thickened epoxy to bring
to smooth condition.
Replace entire crown molding on this
face. Aprox 14'. Remove center
section and save to replace bad
section at far end. See notes and
photo on following page. Attach
molding with stainless steel trim
screws. Fill screw holes with sealant.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
PHOTO # 26
Replace small piece of crown
molding in corner with
salvaged material from
adjacent piece by removing
section and reinstalling.
Reattach molding with
stainless steel screws where
needed and fill with sealant.
Replace entire fascia board at
this location. Aprox. 9'.
14
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood at crown corner. Sand all
weathered wood to bright new
wood. Consolidate wood at
outer 6 -8" with epoxy where
wood is soft. Reattach molding
with stainless steel screws
where needed and fill with
sealant.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
15
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood. Sand all weathered wood
to bright new wood. Consolidate
wood at outer 2 -3" with epoxy
where wood is soft.
Remove and replace min. 8'
section of fascia board. Scrape
paint off of end 4 -6" at adjacent
fascia board and consolidate all
soft wood, especially end grain at
repair location.
See following for soffit
replacement.
Remove and replace aprox. 12' of 1x
T &G (24' linear) soffit boards at this
location. Carefully remove upper
trim at brackets as necessary
without damaging adjacent surfaces,
by carful prying or cutting nails to
allow for full removal and
replacement of soffit board. Verify
condition of sub framing and repair
where necessary. Minimum of 3
pieces of sub framing to be replaced
or sistered. Make end splice of T &G
soffit board under bracket. Reinstall
trim with similar technique as
original.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
At frieze board, remove protruding
nails and refasten board to existing
sub framing with stainless steel
screws to flatten board. Fill screw
holes with sealant.
- After frieze board has been
reattached, remove old paint and
any filler in crack at bottom of
frieze board and fill and smooth
with thickened epoxy.
16
Verify new sheet metal roofing as
covered hole at junction with roof.
Caulk entire joint at bottom edge
with frieze board
Remove all loose paint to bare
wood. Sand all weathered wood to
bright new wood. Consolidate wood
at outer 6 -8" with epoxy where
wood is soft. Reattach molding with
stainless steel screws where needed
and fill with sealant. Clean out old
sealant at opened up mitered joints.
refill with sealant after molding has
been reattached with stainless steel
screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
17
Remove blistered and bubbled paint.
Remove paint to bare wood (4'). Consolidate
soft wood with epoxy and rebuild to profile
with thickened epoxy.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Reattach crown molding with stainless
steel screws. Fill screw holes with
sealant
18
Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright new
wood. Consolidate wood at outer 6 -8"
with epoxy where wood is soft.
Reattach molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant. Clean out old sealant at
opened up mitered joints. Refill with
sealant after molding has been
reattached with stainless steel screws.
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
/Scrape paint off of aprox. 30'of crown
molding and consolidate all soft
wood, especially end grain at joints.
Fill checked and damaged areas with
thickened epoxy to bring to smooth
condition.
PHOTO # 36
19
Replace rotted fascia; aprox 24' on
this elevation.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
20
Condition of crown to be scraped to
bare wood, sanded and epoxied.
Condition of crown to be scraped,
sanded, epoxied and filled.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
21
Scrape paint off of aprox. 30'of crown
molding and consolidate all soft
wood, especially end grain at joints.
Fill checked and damaged areas with
thickened epoxy to bring to smooth
condition.
Remove and replace aprox. 12' of
both fascia and crown. Retain
remainder of existing fascia and
crown.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
( Remove all loose paint to bare wood.
Sand all weathered wood to bright
new wood. Consolidate with epoxy
where wood is soft. Reattach loose
molding with stainless steel screws
where needed and fill with sealant.
Clean out old sealant at opened up
mitered joints. Refill with sealant after
molding has been reattached with
stainless steel screws.
22
TYPICAL AT ALL MITERS.
Scrape paint off of aprox. 20'of crown
molding and consolidate all soft
wood, especially end grain at joints.
Fill checked and damaged areas with
thickened epoxy to bring to smooth
condition.
As above, remove all loose paint to
bare wood. Sand all weathered wood
to bright new wood. Consolidate with
epoxy where wood is soft. Reattach
loose molding with stainless steel
screws where needed and fill with
sealant.
This area part of the 20' listed above.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration
- PHOTO # 43
November 2, 2012
Remove and replace aprox 8'-lO'
section of crown molding that had be
recently replaced, but is already
rotten. Epoxy consolidate end grain
of adjacent boards.
/ � 5hmwin8eplacementcmwnmo|din0
already rotting. 0|d crown molding in
background appears solid.
23
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
Attempt to reattach loose molding.
Caulk remaining joint.
Attempt to reattach loose molding.
/ Caulk remaining joint.
24
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
- Remove and replace half round
gutter. 35'
25
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
With gutter removed, remove
bubbled and blistered paint. Reattach
crown with stainless steel screws and
fill holes with sealant. Prime and
repaint prior to hanging new gutter.
26
Reattach new gutter to existing
corrugated round downspout.
Washington County Historic Courthouse
Wood and Roofing Restoration November 2, 2012
27
Remove and replace aprox. 3' of lx
T &G soffit board at this location.
Carefully remove upper trim at
bracket as necessary without
damaging adjacent surfaces, by
carefully prying or cutting nails to
allow for full removal and
replacement of soffit board. Verify
condition of sub framing and repair
where necessary. Make splice of T &G
board under bracket. Reinstall trim
with similar technique as original.
Caulk gaps on end of brackets