HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-04-03 HPC PacketI
THE B I R T H P L A C E O F MINNESOTA
Agenda
Heritage Preservation Commission
Notice of Meeting
Wednesday April 3, 2013
The regular meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission will begin at 7 p.m., Wednesday, April 3,
2013, in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF March 4, 2013 MINUTES
3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which
are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the
statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in
attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or Tess.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. DESIGN REVIEWS
5.01 Case No. DR/2013 -10. Design review of signage for Black Letter Books located at 102 Main Street South
in the CBD, Central Business District. Cecilia Loome, applicant. Continued from the March 4, 2013 meeting.
5.02 Case No. DR/2013 -12. Design review of signage for Great Clips located at 1820 Market Drive in the BP-
C, Business Park Commercial District. Albrecht Sign Company, applicant.
5.03 Case No. DR/2013 -14. Design review of signage for Asalonna located at 324 Main Street South in the
CBD, Central Business District. Ernie Shores, applicant.
5.04 Case No. DR/2013 -15. Design review of signage for MidCountry Mortgage located at 350 Main Street
North in the CBD, Central Business District. Scenic Sign Corp, applicant.
5.05 Case No. DR/2013 -16. Design review of signage and facade door trim for Angels2Divas located at 221
Chestnut St E in the CBD, Central Business District. Patti Danner, applicant.
5.06 Case No. DR/2013 -17. Design review of signage and fagade repair for Osaka Asian Bistro located at 108
Main St North in the CBD, Central Business District. Sean Flynn, applicant.
5.07 Case No. DR/2013 -18. Design review of signage for Quick Fire Pizza located at 116 Main Street South in
the CBD, Central Business District. St Croix Sign, applicant.
5.08 Case No. DR/2013 -13. Design review of renovation and expansion of a residence located at 322
Broadway Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Mark Balay, representing Brian Brosdahl, applicant.
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. OTHER BUSINESS
7.01 Discussion on the City Council's 1st reading of the Demolition Ordinance.
8. ADJOURNMENT
...............
THE ►IATM ►LACE Of MINNESOTA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
March 4, 2013
7:00 P.M.
Chairman Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Present: Chairman Lieberman, Commissioners Brach, Johnson, Krakowski, Larson, Zahren,
Council Representative Menikheim
Absent: Commissioner Goodman
Staff: Community Development Director Turnblad
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Possible approval of February 4, 2013 meeting minutes
Commissioner Larson pointed out that on Design Review Case No. 2013 -04, he recused himself from the
discussion and would like the minutes to so state.
Motion by Chairman Lieberman (there was no second) to approve the minutes of the February 4, 2013 meeting
with the addition noted above. All in favor, 6 -0.
OPEN FORUM
There were no public comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
DESIGN REVIEWS
Case No. DR/2013 -08. Design review of a roof top vestibule located at 125 Main Street South in the CBD,
Central Business District. Larry Nelson, Mainplace LLC, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman explained that building owner Larry Nelson would like to add a second access to his
rooftop patio, similar to the access which was approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission and built
a number of years ago. This would allow for patio access from both units when they are owned separately.
The new access would be constructed with the same materials as the existing one but would be smaller, with
an 8 foot by 12 foot footprint.
Larry Nelson, applicant, pointed out that the interior stairway has not been designed yet, so he isn't sure
where it will penetrate the roof. He said he wants to keep the look simple and industrial in materials and
design.
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting March 4, 2013
Commissioner Larson said he agrees with the design intentions but would like to see what the finished
access will look like.
Mr. Nelson responded that he would be happy to bring completed plans back for final approval.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Zahren, to approve the new roof access as
conditioned, with the added conditions that the access be kept as close to the north edge of the building as
possible and as far back from the east edge as possible, and that the applicant submit plans for the final design
and materials before construction. All in favor, 6 -0.
Case No. 2013 -09. Design review of an addition of an exterior bar at the caboose located at 305 Water Street
South, The Freight House, in the CBD, Central Business District. Aspire Development, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman explained the applicant is requesting approval for an expanded covered outdoor bar at
the Freight House. A Design Review Permit was issued last year for a similar project with a different design
but was not constructed. No expansion in seating capacity is proposed; as submitted the plans likely
represent a small reduction in seating capacity.
, representing the Freight House, stated that this structure is more compatible with the existing
caboose structure than the previous proposal. It will create an outdoor garden feel with a natural timber
look.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brach, to approve the modifications to the
caboose patio bar as conditioned, with added conditions that the rooflines of the two structures be freestanding,
not joined, and that this project replaces the previously approved structure. All in favor, 6 -0.
Case No. 2013 -11. Design review of window replacement and trim located at 222 Chestnut Street East in the
CBD, Central Business District. Thomond O'Brien, applicant.
Chairman Lieberman explained the applicant is requesting approval to replace two existing wood -frame
windows with two similar vinyl -clad windows. No changes are proposed to the window opening size.
Thomond O'Brien, applicant, stated that the existing windows don't protect the building from water; he also
would like to finish the stucco to one uniform color.
Commissioner Johnson recognized this is an alley side of the building and the second floor elevation is not
as noticeable. If there is an opportunity when framing the window to bring it out flush with the face of the
stucco, it would be sealed better from water.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to approve the replacement of the
windows as proposed. All in favor, 6 -0.
Commissioner Larson offered that there are paint -on products that could be applied to even out the texture
of the stucco.
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brach, to approve the repainting of the stucco in
one color, light gray, with a paint that is suitable for application on stucco. All in favor, 6 -0.
Case No. 2013 -10. Design review of signage for Black Letter Books located at 102 Main Street South in the
CBD, Central Business District. Cecilia Loome, applicant.
Page 2 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting February 4, 2013
Chairman Lieberman explained the applicant is requesting approval for two wall signs, a smaller sign of
24.8 square feet on Myrtle Street East, and a larger sign of 43.3 square feet on Main Street North. The new
signs would replace former This Love of Mine wall signs. They would not be illuminated.
Commissioner Johnson noted that the requested signs appear to conflict with awnings that were recently
approved by the Commission for this location.
Motion by Chairman Lieberman, seconded by Commissioner Zahren, to table the application until the applicant
can be present, due to the confusion over the placement of signs and awnings. All in favor, 6 -0.
NEW BUSINESS
City Planner Position
Community Development Director Turnblad indicated he is reviewing 120 applications for the City Planner
position. He is not sure yet who will staff the Commission - it will depend on the skill set of the person who
is hired.
Commissioner Terms
Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Krakowski, to recommend to the Council
that John Brach and Scott Zahren be reappointed to the Heritage Preservation Commission. All in favor, 6-
0.
Demolition Ordinance
Chairman Lieberman brought up that he has struggled with this ordinance from the beginning He agrees
that the Commission's charge is to view proposals from the standpoint of preservation, not economics. He
would welcome an opportunity for the Commission to review the ordinance again.
Community Development Director Turnblad replied that the Council tabled the ordinance for additional
input from the HPC. It will be brought back to the HPC at its April meeting.
Commissioner Johnson noted the ordinance, being fairly new, is complicated. The first demolition
considered under the ordinance was a complex case. He would like to see how the ordinance plays out in
other cases. He also suggested that maybe three consultants could be prequalified by the City to do
demolition reviews at an established price, to speed up review timelines.
Chairman Lieberman responded that property owners may question the City using a pre - selected consultant.
He believes in preservation but the process seems cumbersome and he doesn't want the Commission called
into question for applying subjective analysis to determine what a property owner can do.
Commissioner Johnson reflected that a lot of property ownership issues are cumbersome and regulated, such
as maintaining a septic system. The ordinance encourages maintaining the status quo rather than requiring
change or action on a property owner's part.
Council Representative Menikheim commented that the City should better publicize its commitment to
historic preservation.
Page 3 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting March 4, 2013
Community Development Director Turnblad replied it's clearly stated in the comprehensive plan, which is a
reflection of what the community wants.
The Commission discussed ways to convey and promote its commitment to preservation and related issues,
such as newspaper columns and the web site.
OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Lieberman adjourned the meeting at 8:18 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Julie Kink
Recording Secretary
Page 4 of 4
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: March 25, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -10
APPLICANT: Cecilia Loome, Black Letter Books
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Black Letter Books
LOCATION: 102 Main St N
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE: April 3, 2013, continued from March 4, 2013
REVIEWER: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
BACKGROUND
This sign request was discussed at the March 4, 2013 HPC meeting and tabled for
clarification of the owner's intent regarding a previously approved awning plan. In
January 2013, the HPC approved a design review permit for awnings at 102 Main Street
and for two other adjacent commercial spaces. Staff contacted the property owner who
provided a written statement relinquishing the design review permit for the awnings
and requesting that the HPC approve the sign request.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for two wall signs at 102 Main
St N for Black Letter Books. The request includes a smaller wall sign (24.8 square feet)
along Myrtle Street E and a larger sign (43.3 square feet) along Main Street N. The new
wall signs would replace former This Love of Mine walls signs.
The Main Street wall sign would state "Black Letter Books" on the first line and "used,
rare, out of print" on the second line. Lettering would be gold on a dark lilac/ gray
background. The sign perimeter would include a red accent border and gold trim. The
sign would be 13 feet, 8 inches wide by 3 feet, 2 inches tall for a total of 43.3 square feet
in area. The sign would be constructed of painted wood with applied lettering. The
sign will be not be illuminated.
102 Main St N
Page 2
The Myrtle Street wall sign would state "Black Letter Books" in gold letters on a dark
lilac /gray background. The sign perimeter would include a red accent border and gold
trim. The sign would be 7 feet, 10 inches wide by 3 feet, 2 inches tall for a total of 24.8
square feet in area. The sign would be constructed of painted wood with applied
lettering. The sign will be not be illuminated.
For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states
building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot
for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space has 48 feet facing Main
Street and 85 feet facing Myrtle Street. The proposed sign areas are 24.8 square feet and
43.3 square feet respectively, less than allowed by the zoning ordinance.
The proposed location, material, shape and lettering of the new signs are consistent
with the recommendations in the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District
Design Manual. The proposed background color of dark lilac /gray varies from the
narrow palette of dark green, dark brown and black discussed in the Design Manual
but is consistent with the intent of the recommendation that sign backgrounds consist of
dark, subdued tones.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage without HPC approval.
3. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval.
4. This approval revokes the design review permit issued for the installation of
awnings on January 7, 2013, Case No. DR/2012 -36.
attachments: Applicant's Form, Letter and Photos
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No: ► ' .1 IP
Date Filed: a , d-
Receipt No.: 4L 3a
Base Fee: $25.00
Technology Fee: $25.00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project k2, S. Alat.i& Si Assessor's Parcel No. 20302011/6002-
Zoning District C't
Description of Project in detail Sir", f Or 1/45-forefront p f1, 4-ke
southwest Corner of nllaart, nkgrt -It • oke, CIO sign, fors mot &ce, o€ +ke,
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner I(NtStneniy✓0hvi& l6rN.1Q RepresentativeOCk I.ei a S�( ili�G,, Loom i
Mailing Address-49 EL rOUgk WGL W i15 J Mailing Address 102 S . WW1. S +.
City State Zip EdAi, IJ11.1 55135 City State Zip S-i(k jckw, MF■1 55D8/
Telephone No. 602 -13 3-0-
Signature
(Required)
Telephone No. (051 430180,- 4i-' 56r3
(cell)
Signature
(Required)
Ctci li Ott b r►ne p,� p�u 1. ern
January 29, 2013
2/18/2013
To the members of the Heritage Preservation committee:
Thank you for considering my request for permission to erect signage on my bookstore on the corner of
Main and Myrtle in downtown. My plan for signage is straightforward. The previous occupant had two
flat signs, which were placed directly above the windows on either side of the building (one on the east
side, facing Main, and the smaller on the north side, facing Myrtle). These signs have since been painted
over (please see attached photo). My new signs will be the same measurements and will be placed in
the same position as the previous tenant's, which are both sympathetic to the architectural features of
the building face as well as in conformity with the city's signage regulations.
Sincerely,
6{,,z X-,-‹_
r
N-AcK, LETTER 13'2
gooks
Smalle(' 5 Pt, faCirC9 MMrfk.
Larer 311111 -Fac/i n9 M o 't citc .TTE Z ScolcS 3 uscd • rA4 C. bU-of Tr inf Z ()ltd. ¶a ) 1
3'
I g
BLACK LETTER BOOKS
used - rare - out of print
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: March 25, 2013
APPLICANT: Stillwater Marketplace III, Stuart Kline
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Great Clips
LOCATION: 1820 Market Drive
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C - Commercial
ZONING: BP -C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE: April 3, 2013
REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
CASE NO.: 2013 -12
BACKGROUND
On August 6, 2012, the HPC reviewed and approved a sign for Great Clips for the front
elevation of their tenant space at 1820 Market Drive. This request is for a sign for the
rear elevation.
DISCUSSION
The proposed sign is identical to the sign approved for the front elevation. The sign will
state "Great Clips" in white acrylic letters outlined in black. No logo is proposed. The
sign is 12'2" wide by 20 inches tall for a total of 17.96 square feet in area. The sign will
be internally illuminated.
The West Business Park design standards state that wall signs shall meet the
requirements in the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows one wall sign per
building face. Sign area is based on one square foot for each foot of building frontage.
The applicant's retail space has 19.1 feet of frontage. The proposed sign area is less than
allowed under the zoning ordinance.
1820 Market Drive
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage without HPC approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form and Sign Plan
'SIGN RMEIN APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILtWAi'ER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
Sl'ILLWATER, MN 55082
Case No: Dirt 33
Date Filed: �O 1,3
Receipt No. :Lq41
Fee' $2!5.00
T
inbloLW &e `
The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all foams and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting
material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the
property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, Sketches and a letter of intent is
required/
Fourteen (14) copies of ail supporting materials are required.
All following information is required,
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
t/QAssessor's Parcel No.
7,—a30::::;g7-1°4:"162
Zoning District Description of Project In detail r / �v
Di\ M d i em4. -147 bVi /U(4L , , �'; is' .r'r27,e,:1772tT)C,Y\/ .': /.4)
Address of Project
'IT hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, 0 the best of my knowledge and belief, to be
true and correct. 1 further certify 1' will comply with the permit if it is granted and
used"
if representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Property Owner to-uclar" mAt i 'Arte resentative 5*/4, z-`}' F irr� pwjvY2 -
�v
Mailing Address 3333 1� -ionic 44 32n �7 Mailing Address �-
City State zip,ec -ci'iw j olLy Y1 Zz City State Zip
Telephone No. a.16,--tf - - -��G — elepSone No.
Signature
aired)
H:\mcnamara\sheiie\20o5\design review permit.wpd
July 13, 2005
Signature;;
(Required)
0
0
0
z
w
i";"
z
0) 0)
co
— = N.)
* *
al CU
A- 0
CD "I
co
73
a.
£ L /OZ /Z :a ;ea
0
5
0.
3anivN91S
0
ELI
z
6
@
0
0
0
X
L79Z6Z ON laa(oad
SIN =aIe sl
0
SdTla IVai
C)
01(3
> >
0
7J Z
p Z
rn
°
r-
m •
l `j
m
00,x
m
ea
>
m
g o
c
6 3 co
g
Tua3
cr
m >
a -0
a -0
g-
m
/ 5 Z
m
a (>44
cr -8
n
g. I
0:433-
3
2
4j,
Fi
g
gR
0
44-
§
3 .
NJ
A
P?.
co
0 00 ID 0
-1
o
>0
C m
00
m
0
n1
(3)
u, --a> -4
n ;0 m m
m C
rn f* 2.
1= m >
> -c,
0
.oc
w{0
N>:> -4
m'c -4 nitm
,m,m z Z
A >
r
m
)4',E 11 "it
4 m
';>;' —
inr1 <
.0 z
z >
0, z 0 -4
m
X ,q
0 ,M X
Mi 0
s'
M
=i
1*
m
2; !
1°1 !
I ;
1 I
m;sp;m m
0
0 n
m
rz 0 X
IZC -7(
"r= 17 55
-71
012'
-41
a 211
mi
0
0
0
4) 00
;›; 1m m
(fi
'n 0
:3p
It;
!CI '
(M! '
0
! Z
I
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: March 25, 2013
APPLICANT: A'salonna, LLC and Grand Garage Holdings, LLC
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for A'salonna
LOCATION: 324 Main Street S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE: April 3, 2013
REVIEWERS: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
CASE NO.: 2013 -14
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for
A'salonna at 324 Main Street S. The proposed sign face is 30 inches by 28 inches for a
total of 5.83 square feet. The sign will state "A'salonna" in red letters and "Aveda
Salon" in black letters on a white background. The A'salonna logo will be above the
lettering. The logo is a white "A" on tan background outlined in red. A black arrow at
the bottom of the sign points toward the salon's entrance on Nelson Street. The sign is
proposed to be constructed from white composite aluminum and will be installed in an
existing black metal frame on the Main Street facade. The sign will be illuminated by
existing building lighting.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual recognizes projecting signs as a
component of the historic streetscape, provided they are small and simple. The
guidelines encourage the use of materials consistent with the period such as wood
signboards and metal brackets.
Size and height of projecting signs are regulated by the zoning ordinance. The zoning
ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not
counted towards the total area. The total area of the proposed sign is less than six
324 Main Street S
Page 2
square feet. The zoning ordinance also states that projecting signs must be easily visible
from the sidewalk and not a hazard to pedestrians. The location of the existing sign
frame meets these requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. Any revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk.
3. No additional signage without HPC approval.
4. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form and Sign Plan
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: March 29, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -15
APPLICANT: Patrick Juttar and Scenic Sign
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for MidCountry Mortgage
LOCATION: 350 Main St N
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE: April 3, 2013
REVIEWER: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 350 Main St N.
This site is within the Mills on Main building. The sign is proposed to contain the
business name "MidCountry Mortgage" in black individual letters mounted to the
building facade. The proposed sign is 9 feet, 4 inches wide and 2 feet, 3.5 inches tall for
a total area of 20.5 square feet. The sign would be illuminated by external black
gooseneck lighting mounted above the sign on the building and directed downward.
For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states
building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot
for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's space where the sign is proposed
curves around the corner of Main Street and Mulberry Street with a frontage of
approximately 24 feet and then extends along Main Street for 113 feet. The total sign
area of the proposed sign is 20.5 square feet which is less than allowed under the zoning
ordinance. Externally illuminated wall signs are permitted by the zoning ordinance in
the Central Business District.
350 Main St N
Page 2
Mills on Main Sign Plan
A formal sign plan was not completed for Mills on Main, but the original building plans
called for wall signs to be installed in the size and location proposed. External lighting
utilizes fixtures different from other lighting on the building but consistent with those
used to light other signs in the Central Business District.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage without HPC approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form and Sign Plans
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Received
Community Development Department MAR 1 5 2013
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Community Development Department
Case No:
Date Filed:
Receipt No.:
Base Fee: $25.60
Technology Fee: $25.00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 35D /1a 4`^ Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District CZ D Description of Project in detail i A. - Li
C.--6-A-U-5 pc,t, J\ iv-e-Sk \'7\4,,c,_ .--ci I e._,‘ \----kf `k0.3./
7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
wt
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Property Owner ?A-1--r\,
Mailing Address 5W Diu S* AJ
City State Zip_ '""
Telephone No. Lb tD
Signature
(Required)
S :\Planning\design review permit.wpd
Representative x cwt G S =`�� ( 72)0vJ �r
Mailing Address PO y
City State Zips -- doxk , Lt) S-63o�
Telephone No 3x g-tto
Signature
Require
January 29, 2013
3
3
rn 0
2 —I p
m
n � -
O > 0
m rn 5
D m
z-
0 m
O • 2
2 O
m r
m r"
3JVld NI
dIlD
0
m
0
O
c
m
N
z
GEMINI PAD ASSEMBLY
3
3
e
O
N
O
W
a
3
0
1
Lights supplied and installed by others
auoDllis pue salog palllap e!A)plaq of lunow paalp
1 -1/2 "thick Sintra with Gemini studs on back
brick exterior
All original designs are exclusive property of Scenic Sign Corp.
d L-2131`dM111110M:LNVIZILL•1•1411 `I
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING:
HPC DATE:
REVIEWERS:
PREPARED BY:
March 27, 2013
CASE NO.: 2013 -16
Patti Danner, Angels2Divas, and Central Bank, property owner
Design Review of proposed signage and door color for
Angels2Divas
221 Chestnut St E
PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
CBD - Central Business District
April 3, 2013
Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
DISCUSSION
Sign Request
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for
Angels2Divas at 221 Chestnut Street E. The proposed sign face is 2 feet by 3 feet for a
total of 6 square feet. The sign will include the pink and black "Angels2Divas" name
and logo and "Sinfully Stylish" below in black script. The background of the sign will
be white with a pink and black decorative border. The sign is proposed to be
constructed of painted alumalite board. Alumalite is a light- weight, durable aluminum
composite panel with a high - density polyallomer core. The sign will be installed at the
building corner as shown on the attached photograph, using a black metal decorative
bracket 10 feet above the sidewalk. The sign will not be illuminated.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual recognizes projecting signs as a
component of the historic streetscape, provided they are small and simple. The
guidelines encourage the use of materials consistent with the period such as wood
signboards and metal brackets.
221 Chestnut Street E
Page 2
Size and height of projecting signs are regulated by the zoning ordinance. The zoning
ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not
counted towards the total area. The zoning ordinance also states that projecting signs
must be easily visible from the sidewalk and not a hazard to pedestrians. The proposed
sign meets these requirements.
Painting Request
The applicant has also requested approval to paint the door of the retail space a bright
pink that matches their logo color to highlight their entrance. Photographs and a color
sample are attached to this report.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides that "[t]he color of buildings
should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious effect" and that
"colors which visually overpower or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors"
should be avoided. The manual also states that "tasteful use of color and accent can
introduce variety and charm" with the goal "to achieve an area -wide complementary
blend of background colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and
focal colors." The main building material is brick with tan accents and dark wood trim.
The proposed door color appears to be an appropriate use of primary or focal color.
RECOMMENDATION
If the Commission finds the colors and materials acceptable, staff would recommend
approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. Any revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk.
3. No additional signage without HPC approval.
4. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval.
5. This approval is for painting of the door only. Any other facade modifications
require separate HPC review and approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form, Sign Plans, Photographs and Color Sample
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATIONIK1104
MAR 1 5
Community Development Dept lisinittattt Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No:
Date Filed:
Receipt No.: .�
Base Fee: $25.00 /iX(o
Technology Fee: $25,00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All Following information is required .
PRO PERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project e, W,GLI- // 7 sessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Description of Project in detail ZF'.�CA.t)
"1' hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner
Mailing AddressOLj
City State Zip \ Q1,UpfrY i"J () SS S5
Telephone No.
trio & )lJ
Signature
Representative
Mailing Address tt-4- .
City State Zip SA-11 lu er fYlNLMCJeQ
Telephone No. Zo51,t_..3/4 -LgGlp
Signature =► C \f A )
(Required)
5: \Planning\design review oermmt.wpd
January 29, 2013
-C6
c• jfac io..f 'tn b \ac -
- mourvNA 10' Lxp Prorn SAC 1C--
- exA.end► i ow v.
Received
A1AR 1 5 2013
Community Development Department
V.-CC,rNT c Q o \orr-
Received
MAR 152013
Community Development Department
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING:
HPC DATE:
REVIEWER:
PREPARED BY:
March 29, 2013
CASE NO.: 2013 -17
Dan Smith, Sound Properties, and Sean Flynn, Northstar Sign
Design Review of proposed signage and facade repair for Osaka
Express
108 Main Street N
PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
CBD - Central Business District
April 3, 2013
Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign and facade repair at
108 Main Street N for Osaka Asian Bistro. The applicant is proposing to cover the entire
damaged facade area above the storefront windows with black polymetal (see attached
photographs). White vinyl letters stating "Osaka Asian Bistro" would be attached to the
metal. No illumination is proposed for the sign.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual states that historical building
materials in the commercial core were brick, stone and wood and that introduction of
dissimilar materials, such as metal, should be avoided. The request to use metal
material in lieu of masonry for facade repair is not consistent with the guidance in the
Design Manual.
For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states
building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot
for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 40 feet long facing Main
St N. The total sign area of the proposed lettering is 40 square feet, but sign area is
typically calculated to include the sign background. Using metal for facade repair as
108 Main Street N
Page 2
well as for the sign background in reality appears as one large sign. The proposed area
of metal installation is 4 feet by 19 feet or 76 square feet which exceeds the sign area
allowed by the zoning ordinance.
The design guidelines for the downtown historic district recommend painted wood
using simple, bold lettering on a black, dark green or similar background with white or
gold letters. The guidelines for storefront signs state that signs should be located on the
horizontal band separating the storefront windows from the upper facade. The
storefront sign should be used to display the name of the business preferably in one
line.
The proposed sign has appropriate colors and simple lettering as recommended by the
guidelines. The metal material may be appropriate for the sign if limited to the sign
area. Revising the text to one line would improve consistency with the design
guidelines.
There is an existing 32- square foot sign previously approved for the restaurant. This
sign would need to be removed as a condition of any new sign permit. The applicant
previously applied for design review for an awning, and that request was tabled by the
HPC at their November 2012 meeting. That application has been withdrawn.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the HPC provide direction to the applicant regarding
appropriate facade and sign design and materials and then table the application to the
May 6, 2013 HPC meeting so that revised plans may be provided.
attachments: Applicant's Form, Sign Plan and Photographs
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
215 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No:
Date Filed:
Receipt No.:
Base Fee: $25.00
Technology Fee: $25.00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All Following information is required
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 108 Main St.
Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Description of Project in detail Cosmetic repair to store front,
Attach black poly -metal to sign area above windows. Sign= Apply white vinyl to black sign area
copy= OSAKA! ASIAN BISTRO 40" X 144"
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
0 representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner
"5.A.A.A.,A ,-�i �-e Jj Representative North Star Sign
38463 Coventry Dr.
Mailing Address 1.0 ii 4 , to (A 447 Mailing Address
City State Zip ' #: r LUG -z(-1 MA S,' 2 City State Zip North Branch, MN 55056
Telephone N - = - Telephone No. 651 -398 -7152
Signature ■, wig Signature 56444171
(Required)
Req ire
S: \Planning\design review permit.wpd January 29, 2013
Application for Sign Permit
Fee: $50.00
Community Development Department
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
651- 430 -8820
Location of Sign
Address 108 Main St.
city
Stillwater
State
MN ,
lip
55082
Applicant
Name North Star Sign
Phone# 651- 398 -7152
Address 38463 Coventry Dr.
c'tYNorth Branch
Stale MN
Zip 55056
Owner (if different from Applicant)
Name V n . L�� o
V V
# It l
a z.632.7.,—/
s-
Address
City
Phone
_
Contractor's Ndme
Name Sean Flynn
Phoned
651-398-7152
Address 38463 Coventry Dr.
City North Branch
State MN
Zip 55056
Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application)
Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to
be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if
the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building.
Design Review application (if required) All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West
Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC.
Sign Details
Sign Size: Dimensions: 3.3 Feet 12feet
= Square Feet 40
Sign Height: (If freestanding)
Setbacks: From Property Line
From Bldg Wall sign From Driveway /Parking Lot
Colors: White
Materials Vinyl
Illumination: ❑ Yes ix No
If Yes, Type.
Declaration
I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief. l hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or
employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is
issued reed to this request.
r Signature (requi
3494 3
Date
Applicant Signature Sew v. preiPtOt,
Review (For office use only)
❑ Approved ❑ Denied
Date 3 -18 -13
Date
1 By
Permit #
Conditions for approval:
* Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater Contractor's license application form
is available at Stillwater City Hall.
Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651 - 454 -0002 before you dig to
identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service.
S lPlanning \Forms\Application for Sign Permit.dor. Updated. September 23, 2006
OSAKA
ASIAN BISTRO
iliwater
H E 6 , R T H P L A C E 6 F M I N N F S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE: March 27, 2013
APPLICANT: Ryan Lettner, Quickfire Pizza, and LDL Company, property owner
REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Quickfire Pizza
LOCATION: 116 Main Street S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE: April 3, 2013
REVIEWERS: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
CASE NO.: 2013 -18
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for
Quickfire Pizza at 116 Main Street S. The proposed sign face is 40 inches by 21.5 inches
with an area just under 6 square feet. The oval sign will include the orange and black
"Quickfire Pizza" name and logo on a gray background. The sign will have a black
metal border, and the Quickfire orange and gray logo is incorporated into the black
metal sign bracket. The sign will be constructed of brushed aluminum and will be
installed above the restaurant entrance as shown on the attached photograph. The sign
will not be illuminated.
The Commercial Historic District Design Manual recognizes projecting signs as a
component of the historic streetscape, provided they are small and simple. The
guidelines encourage the use of materials consistent with the period such as wood
signboards and metal brackets.
Size and height of projecting signs are regulated by the zoning ordinance. The zoning
ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not
counted towards the total area. The zoning ordinance also states that projecting signs
116 Main Street S
Page 2
must be easily visible from the sidewalk and not a hazard to pedestrians. The proposed
sign meets these requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
If the Commission finds the colors and materials acceptable, staff recommends approval
as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. Any revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk.
3. No additional signage without HPC approval.
4. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval.
attachments: Applicant's Form, Sign Plan and Photograph
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Community Development Department
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Case No:
Date Filed:
Receipt No.:
Base Fee: $25.00
Technology Fee: $25.6
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
S, Assessor's Parcel No. d Qeo�
Address of Project ((Co a(� , p�g p�y�/
n
Zoning District C-151) 1) Description of Project in detail r\S f -all j 0140 n
CIA € c btaAye.. sIgqp
:J
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct, I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner L 2--- e(-) Representative ;. (DO( S1 1
�. Mailing Address % /C63 %fe�''!�'1��.�����'� Mailing Address I�� 5 , �aii1 1'
-ri Ci SV/z '
City State Zip cif %�� City State Zip ;�l l vA7a-1-Pf 1 MN 53-og�
?OOq T/!t7 ,
elephone No. ._.11-- /- y59 /y/ 2- Telephone No. i
Si natu / Signature REAA.1
(Required) aye4 t
S: \Planning \design review permit.wpd
Required)
January 29, 2013
Received
MAR 1 9 2013
Community Development Department
ArAin„►h Hm9''.19 sir, 40 x 215 i►1c.keds, -661 of 6 sqpAve. fe es{
gvHsked olkmi►uuyt f acs With diMeAsiawl revs and T'APleic,i
Approved
Date Signed
15207 N 63rd St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
651206.8025
todd @stcroixsign.com
Date Required
Deposit
C�1
(
Estimate is good for 30 days.
Banners, coro signs & orders under
$300 require payment at the time of order.
All other projects will start with 50% down,
balance due on delivery or before installation.
Drawings are the property of St Croix Sign
until paid in full or rights for design is paid for.
Banners will take 6 to 8 business days, custom signs will take 15 to 25 business days.
Approved
Date Signed
Date Required
Deposit
15207 N 63rd St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
651.206.8025
todd @stcroixsign.com
msi
(
Estimate is good for 30 days.
Banners, coro signs & orders under
$300 require payment at the time of order.
All other projects will start with 50% down,
balance due on delivery or before installation.
Drawings are the property of St Croix Sign
until paid in full or rights for design is paid for.
Banners will take 6 to 8 business days, custom signs will take 15 to 25 business days.
Sti I lwa ter
T H E B T H P L A T F OF M I H H E O 1 A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
March 29, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -13
APPLICANT: Brian Brosdahl and Heather Fox, property owners, and
Mark Balay, architect
REQUEST: Design Review Permit for a single - family home addition and remodel
LOCATION: 322 Broadway Street S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use
ZONING: CBD - Central Business District
HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 3, 2013
REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
PREPARED BY: Melissa Douglas, Interim City Planner
BACKGROUND
The subject property at 322 Broadway Street S is situated on the bluff overlooking
downtown and the Saint Croix River directly above Teddy Bear Park. Although shown as
Downtown Mixed Use on the Comprehensive Plan and zoned as CBD - Central Business
District, the single - family home is more accurately part of the South Hill residential area
and within the Neighborhood Conservation District (see attached Location Map).
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 2
The applicants' architect provided a sketch of the original structure on the property from
files at the Stillwater Library. This structure appeared to be part of a boarding house that
extended onto the adjacent property to the west. The existing single - family home on the
property was constructed in 1865 according to the Final Survey Report for the South Hill
Stillwater Residential Area dated August 1996. This structure existed before the area was
platted resulting in the unusual lot configuration. The property is accessed via a long
shared private drive and has no street frontage. The home is oriented to the bluff rather
than the street. (See attached Neighborhood Photo.)
The survey indicated that the existing home to the west was constructed between 1910 and
1924, and the existing home to the east, formerly a church, was built during the same time
period. The Mortimer Webster House, built in 1875 and individually listed on the National
Register, lies further to the east on the other side of Broadway Street. The survey indicates
that the adjacent home to the south, the E.W. Durant house at the northeast corner of
Second Street S and Pine Street E, may be eligible for listing on the National Register. The
survey did not note any historic significance to the subject property.
A variance to the rear yard setback was granted to the subject property in 1977 to facilitate
construction of the existing detached garage. The current property owners sought and were
granted four setback variances in 2012 and 2013 to facilitate additions to and remodel of the
existing home. These variances included two setback variances from the south property line
for an addition connecting the existing garage to the existing residence, a side setback
variance for a proposed conservatory on the east side of the existing home and a bluff
setback variance to allow construction of a porch on the north side of the existing home.
(See attached variance plot plan.) Design review of the proposed additions was required as
a condition of variance approval.
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 3
SPECIFIC REQUEST
The applicants are requesting design review for their proposed residential additions and
remodel. The proposal includes:
• Remodel of the existing garage
• An addition to the south to connect the existing home to the garage
• A new porch wrapping around a portion of the west side and extending across the
north side of the home
• Addition of a new tower at the northeast corner
• A new conservatory on the east side of the home
The existing home will be extensively remodeled, and the architectural style of the home
will change from the existing 19th Century Vernacular to a Queen Anne style.
Relationship to the Demolition Ordinance
The City of Stillwater has a demolition ordinance for the purpose of preserving
architectural and historic resources of the city. This ordinance defines demolition as:
1. Razing of a building
2. Removal of 50 percent or more of the total facade.
3. Removal of more than 20 percent of the exterior of the facade of structure including
the front - facing roof. The amount of front facade that is required to be removed for a
front porch shall not be counted toward the 20 percent.
Once all of the proposed additions are completed, it is likely that the project would meet the
criteria #2 and #3 of the demolition ordinance. However, the applicants plan to phase their
additions and remodel over time, a scenario not contemplated by the demolition ordinance.
Staff is not suggesting that a demolition permit is required for the proposed project but
rather that the infill design guidelines are the appropriate standard for review. The
applicants' architect has provided information to allow staff and the HPC to evaluate the
proposal relative to those standards.
DISCUSSION
The Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) design guidelines are intended to serve as a
framework to guide the design process, while allowing for individuality and creativity in
architectural design. Twenty -seven guidelines make up the NCD design manual. These
guidelines cover three general areas including Neighborhood and Streets, Building and Site,
and Architectural Detail. Staff review of the guidelines is summarized below. The applicants'
architecture also addressed the guidelines in his submittal attached to this report.
322 Broadway Street S — Design Review
Page 4
Number
Guideline
Comments
1
Massing and scale of new building should be compatible
with neighboring structures.
Adjacent properties have a
variety of mass, height and style.
See site plan and elevation
demonstrating change in mass
from existing home.
2
Respect the rhythm of the streetscape.
No street frontage, not
applicable.
3
Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street
and adjacent properties.
No street frontage, not
applicable.
4
Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing
roofs in the neighborhood.
Adjacent properties have a
variety of roof styles.
5
Building height should be considered in choosing roof
forms, architectural style and relating to content.
Except for new tower element,
additions maintain the existing
height of the home.
6
Building and site design should respond to natural
features.
The property is level and has no
significant natural features other
than the bluff.
7
Respect the site's natural slope in new building design:
minimize cut, fill and retaining walls.
The property is level, excavation
to be limited to basement
expansion to the east, two crawl
spaces and trenching for new
sewer service.
8
When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their
impact.
No new retaining walls are
proposed.
9
Preserve significant trees.
Three ash trees are proposed for
removal.
10
Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and
neighborhood patterns.
No street frontage, not
applicable.
11
Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and
street front.
No street frontage, the existing
garage is set back behind home.
12
The size and mass of the structure should be compatible
with the size of the property.
Adjacent properties have a
variety of mass, height and style.
See site plan and elevation
demonstrating change in mass
from existing home.
13
Consider front porch elements in the design of infill
structures.
A new front porch is proposed.
14
Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main
building.
No accessory buildings are
proposed.
15
Design and detail new construction as four -sided
architecture.
Four -sided architecture is
proposed.
16
The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale
and character to the houses of the streetscape.
Adjacent properties have a
variety of mass, height and style.
See site plan and elevation
demonstrating change in mass
from existing home.
322 Broadway Street S — Design Review
Page 5
Number
Guideline
Comments
17
Building elements should be proportional to the scale and
style of the building and its context.
The existing home is of
vernacular architecture. The
proposed remodel would be in
the Queen Anne style. The
proposed tower addition is
keeping with the Queen Anne
style. The height of the tower
should be reduced to 35 feet,
the maximum allowed in the
adjacent residential zoning
district.
18
Use architectural details to create visual interest and
support architectural style.
The proposed Queen Anne style
incorporates many architectural
details.
19
In new building design, consider appropriate materials,
textures, colors and their relationship to other buildings
of the neighborhood.
The proposed color palette is
consistent with the historic
Queen Anne style. Modern
siding, trim and millwork
materials are proposed. Western
Red Cedar fancy cut shingles will
be used for roofing with
reproduction metal and copper
roof cresting and finials. Natural
wood materials will be used for
detail and bracket work.
20
Use masonry and stone authentically.
Masonry detailing at foundation
will be correctly covered with
the remodel.
21
Locate taller portions of buildings to minimize obstruction
of sunlight to adjacent yards and rooms.
The location of the new tower is
away from adjacent properties.
22
Consider neighbor's views in placement and size of new
building elements.
The new tower may have the
potential to obstruct views from
the property to the south, but
that property is situated at a
higher elevation. Reducing the
height of the tower to 35 feet
should limit any impact to views.
23
Windows, balconies and decks should be located to
respect privacy of neighboring properties.
Windows and the new porch are
oriented toward the bluff and
away from neighboring
properties.
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 6
Number
Guideline
Comments
24
Consider using landscape elements and fences to buffer
views and maintain privacy between properties.
The subject property is uniquely
situated with homes on three
sides with little opportunity to
use landscaping or fences to
increase privacy without
obstructing views.
25
Minimize the impact of exterior lighting on adjacent
properties.
Exterior lighting will meet this
guideline.
26
Design grading and impervious surface drainage to
minimize water run -off impact on neighboring properties.
No change in existing drainage
patterns is proposed.
27
Contain debris and respect noise restrictions during
construction.
The applicants' architect
indicates compliance with this
guideline.
The applicants have stated that they plan to phase the project but have not finalized a
phasing plan. Phases should be discrete and result in a finished appearance to the home
and any additions. Applicants have requested that phases be reviewed for compliance with
this requirement with the building permit. Applicants are advised that design review
approval expires after two years, and any phases after that time period will be subject to a
new design review. Any intervening changes to ordinances or design guidelines would be
applicable to the new design review.
The applicants have also indicated that they would like to install a temporary kitchen in the
living area over the garage during the remodel. This request may require a special use
permit, and the applicants should consult further with the Community Development
Director once their plans and phasing have been finalized.
ALTERNATIVES
The HPC has several alternatives related to this design review request:
A. Approve. If the proposed design review request is acceptable to the HPC, it should be
approved. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval.
1. The height of the proposed tower shall be reduced to no more than 35 feet.
2. The project shall be consistent with the plans submitted with the
development review application and on file with the City of Stillwater
Community Development Department.
3. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City
Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC.
Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with
the City Administrator.
4. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 7
5. Any proposed phases should be discrete and result in a finished appearance to
the home and any additions. Phases shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner for compliance with this requirement prior to issuance of the building
permit.
6. Installation of a temporary kitchen in the living area over the garage may require
a special use permit as determined by the Community Development Director.
7. This design review approval expires after two years, and any phases after that
time period will be subject to a new design review. Any intervening changes to
ordinances or design guidelines would be applicable to the new design review.
B. Approve in part.
C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved design
guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the
action is required to be given.
D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be
tabled until your May 6, 2013 meeting so that additional information could be
submitted. The 60 -day decision deadline for the request is May 7, 2013; however, it can
be extended for an additional 60 days.
RECOM MENDATION
Review and take an action.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Neighborhood Photo
3. Variance Plot Plan
4. Design Review Application
5. Architect's Letter, Compliance Analysis and Color Concept
6. Plans
7. Massing Comparisons
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 8
co 0
0
J
co
m .c
N
r
a
e
z1 ij'JJ 211 • 7 .1 1
Ng a a
1211:i illi;b.31f 1-1.1.1.ff, 1 .
� . .ii.056t Etx i lim1Eii Elie
I . 11:1111 1 11 1.1111 S
322 Broadway Street S - Design Review
Page 9
322 Broadway Sre 5 -Deice Review
Page 10
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Racuived
Community Development Department MAR - 7 2013
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Community Development DePanrent
Case No: ! - D'0I3—��
Date Filed: /3
Receipt No.: 'S-0
Base Fee: $25.00
Technology Fee: $25.00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and
a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Only one copy of all supporting materials is required. However, any documents
larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and pdf file format.
After Heritage Preservation Commission approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once
the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit
which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is required .
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 22.E Sl3 W' Jessor's Parcel No. 20(536)20440G24-
Zoning District Description of Project in detail
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comp /y with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
Property Owner
L Representative
Mailing Address X22 �:''C`3,15�j Mailing Address
City State ZiI 1LJtu - �) � v2_City State Zip
Telephone No. t -26,1- 427 Telephone No.
Signature 14 ,��� �s _ Signatur
S: \Planning \design review permit.wpd
mar kg) k41c ct Cel eaL* 2 rd-; -
Mark S. Balay, RA
s t
110 East Myrtle Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 430 -3312
3/7//13
City of Stillwater
Attn: Melissa Douglas
216 N. Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
B
A L A
ARCHITECTS
r
Dear Ms. Douglas and Heritage Preservation Commission Members:
Michael E. Balay, RA
8482 Weaver Woods Place
Noblesville, IN 46060
(317) 845 -9402
Attached are Design Review materials for the home at 322 S. Broadway . The owner has
been working with the planning commission and after issuance of a variance we are
prepared to submit to your group for a Design Review for compliance with the
Neighborhood Conservation District Guidelines
The proposed design footprint is illustrated in a diagram, because it dimensionally
defines the issued variances. All four elevations of the proposed expansion/ renovation
including the existing garage are provided along with conceptual floor plans for your
review.
The overall project consists of expansions on all elevations adding several distinctive
features; a tower; a wrap around porch; and a conservatory with period correct Queen
Anne architectural styling. The project will be constructed in phases with the first phase
being a renovation of the existing garage to provide temporary living quarters during the
next phase of construction. The home will be sided traditionally with 4" lap siding 5./4
trim and fancy cut cedar shingles. We will present a five color color paint scheme palate
for your observation at the meeting.
We ask for your review and approval of our design concept as whole, and anticipate
continued detailing follow up with planning staff during the construction permitting
phase to monitor that we have complied fully with the concept design intent presented
here as each of the project phases proceed.
Thanks in advance for your consideration and we will are looking forward to meeting
with you and discussing the project proposed in further detail.
Sincerely,,.
M. S. Balay
Mark S. Balay Architects, Inc.
Enc. CC: Brian Brosdahl/ Heather Fox
Received
MAR - 7 2013
Community Development Department
Received
3/6/13 MAP - 7 2013
Brosdahl Residence Project
Compliance Analysis Community Development Department
Stillwater Conservation District Design Guidelines 1 -27
1) While individual in site presentation the proposed design solution is compatible
and comparable to the many large scale "bluff' homes surrounding downtown
and the river bluff.
2) n/a This site is really not part of a streetscape it is part of the cityscape.
3) This property sets the dominant setback for its position on the bluff.
4) Roof is designed to the Queen Anne style.
5) Proposed building height is appropriate to a two story home with a tower.
6) The proposed design responds to the geometry of the bluffscape of downtown.
7) n/a Site is basically flat.
8) n/a no retaining walls required.
9) n/a no significant trees on site. Mature ash trees on west property line to be
removed they are infected with ash borer.
10) n/a no garage and driveway position changes proposed
11) The existing garage exterior will be modified minimally but the garage remains
subordinate to the house geometry.
12) The proposed final size of the house is well below % of coverage of adjacent
properties due to the large and unusual geometry of the two parcels.
13) The new wrap around porch is correctly designed in the Queen Anne historical
style and the additions eliminate the remnant of the former porch that was
previously infilled incorrectly per this guideline.
14) n/a There is no accessory building the garage is attached.
15) This design solution presents correct detailing of all elevations with some minor
modern building code restrictions to two of the existing garage elevations
adjacent to the property lines.
16) The proposed design is compatible as required to other homes in the " bluffscape"
17) The proposed design is executed with correct proportion style and scale for the
historical Queen Anne style.
18) The proposed architectural detailing supports the Queen Anne Architectural style
selected for the historical solution.
19) n/a This is not a new building
20) Masonry detailing at basement foundation wall already incorrectly covered but
renovation detailing will correct that.
21) Sunlight is certainly not obstructed by this proposed design based upon site.
22) The proposed design does not obstruct anymore views based upon the elevated
terracing of the home to the south.
23) Privacy of adjacent properties is not affected by the proposed design.
24) n/a due to size of site.
25) All exterior lights will follow guidelines
26) No changes in drainage patterns with proposed design based upon existing
drainage control structures already in place.
27) Will comply with all city regulations in regards to debris, noise and construction.
B A L A Y
ARCHITECTS
Mark S. Balay, RA
110 East Myrtle Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 430 -3312
B
A L A
ARCHITECTS
v
Michael E. Balay, RA
8482 Weaver Woods Place
Noblesville, IN 46060
(317) 845 -9402
EXTERIOR SURFACE COLOR CONCEPT
322 S. Broadway
A five color palette has been selected from California Paint's
"Historic Colors of America" brochure:
1 K -4 Emma Yellow
2 N -12 Lexington Blue Muted Blue
3 K -8 Portsmouth Spice Muted Orange
4 S -7 Beetroot Dark Maroon
5 Q -10 Beauport Aubergne Purple
Roofing color will be the typical orange red asphalt shingle and
Metal trim and detailing will be copper or dark brown anodized.
Roof Cresting and finials will be dark gray.
Color #1 is the main body color and is basically a close match to the existing
body color. It will also be used in patterning in the fancy cut shingles and
wood work detailing
Color #2 is the main outlining and soffit color and is a shift closer two blue
from the existing blue /green trim colors. It will be used generally on
window trim, banding, and corner boards.
Color #3 is an accent color and will be used is small surfaced areas, roof
cove moulding, and incorporated into the patterning in the fancy cut shingles
and woodwork detailing
Color #4 is the color selected for window sashes and storm window frame
color
Color #5 is an accent highlight color and will be utilized as a detail high
chroma color in the fancy cut shingle and woodwork detailing.
The color concept is to create a typical High Victorian Queen Anne style
overall appearance which was widely used in many upscale 19th century
Historic Homes.
Mark S. Balay, RA
110 East Myrtle Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 430 -3312
A L A
ARCHITECTS
Y
Michael E. Balay, RA
8482 Weaver Woods Place
Noblesville, IN 46060
(317) 845 -9402
Exterior Siding, Trim and Wood Detailing Concept
322 S. Braodway
Modern siding trim and Detail Materials to be used are:
• Fiber cement lap siding with 41/2" lap or equal
• Fiber cement detailed paneling for infill areas and
soffits.
• Azek trim boards for and detailed molding or equal
• Western Red Cedar fancy cut shingles
• Fypon architectural detailed architectural woodwork
and 6" porch posts or equal
• Natural wood materials for detail and bracket work as
determined
• Modern reproduction roof cresting and finials in
copper and metal.
• Porch materials will be 3 1/2" tongue and groove pvc
materials.
The elevations provided show the general siding and woodworking detail
proportion and placement for the proposed project with typical traditional
Queen Anne styling.
aoidc uino a�s>>na
0
0
C
r
a u)
ro
E
E '7
w�
Notes:
Bearing system is an CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
assumed datum
o Ind. #7.3774 iron pipe set.
• Ind, iron found as noted.
"M." Ind. Field meas. value.
"R." Ind. recorded value.
Survey Made For:
Brian Brosdahl
1763 Brighton Trail
Woodbury, MN 55125
Existing Parcel Description:
(current fee owner True)
Per Desc. Rec. in Book 306 of Deeds,
Page 297, Wash. Co. records. (see
copy transmitted with this survey)
Survey Made By:
Stack Land Surveying
9090 No. Fairy Falls Road
Stillwater, 11N 55082
tel: (651) 439 -5630
Notes: (cont.)
Part of the existing driveway is
located on Lot 3, Block One, of
Joseph Wolf Brewery Add., Wash.. Co.,
Minnesota. If not currently defined,
this use should be defined by a rec.
easement.
Part of the existing driveway is
located on the NE'ly portion of
the True Parcel. This driveway also
benefits the adjoiner Wily, Harold.
Kimmel. This Use by Kimmel should
be defined by easement and recorded.
11�
Underground or overhead, public or
private utilities, on or adjacent the
parcels, were not located in conjunction
with this survey. No existing esmnt.
desc's. benefiting or encumbering the
True Parcel were supplied to Stack.
Land Surveying for the conduct of
this survey.
Offsets shown to existing structures
are measured at right angles to --
facing description lines, and are
measured to the outside building wall
line, unless noted otherwise. Any
projections from said wall lines,
such as eaves, sills, steps, etc.,
will .impact indicated offsets.
The remaining 1/2 Interest of the
exception parcel is described on Doc. X'
No. 560347, Wash. Co. records.
rs'ffMol/0Y.
- - gs''6 G✓ ,rii,LtoL/N s;1\ s'
s a
6L 'v5 'L✓ os� — - 6LD'G✓
N
0
n / /
vJ /1
A' .�.,h£.tAoUS
db "9£
11.
ti
os/
/1
N
k
'8f
N
Vv
L
v
4
• N
4 W
N
1 . ,00/ .d, VN •\ `ry q� n
1+ O �v N O1 ,g N� k
1 V
1 hereby certify that this survey, plan, or reps r was \j
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
NI
sl
") rill M
V
2,1 ^ • I ��h
1 I 6
Aug. 9, 201.2
Date
Reg.No 1.3774
.n.,,,,��,,
Vios ArIW 8 =1VMli S
Hlnos z
]oNCs A 1HVOS08 ]Hi
aya -.1- uo!l!PPV P.,, '.0!-P.,,,8 Pnoey V
[ , , < a , ', o c ',
,
—
wI
..ma SYrh
�,aJCVMGVO ,
IV - VI
µ w,�
.. '
a
o o .. w , . , .
1
11
■
1
RIM
..ca] a1
1
ric
V10531,0,1 J31HM1111=
AVMOV08 HIf10S ZZ�
20N]G S 1HVOSO4E ]Hi
a41 le 4 u, 1 aPJ PJ_ 0g.10ua?: V
a o
,. '
VE,�.1,61,,o
", "
1 VIO
o o .. .
1
11
■
1
RIM
..ca] a1
1
ric
ro
VLOS3 N NI ',N b1,1VM-1111
,\dn�adole Hlnos zzE
a_ JO; uo�.1:PPV Puo uoq.,, ,,,
y
o o
°,�
a
,
s
w
a u
p
��
, �
A u wn
�_
9
I
___ , �
_
'!
s
i
w
w
LL
Community Development Department
CC
Community Development department
e1053NNIVJ +u31MM11■15
J.VMO` O R H1nOS Z'
ONHCilS- i 1HVO O 9 ]H1
a41 J0j. ,ppd p u- ogcnouc
n .. o c . 1
,'1
;
Y ,e
_, ,„ .
�V 1 H,o
Hi
xiss4
bli,
... „ .. ■ .
CC
Community Development department
�.a
HLJST011,1 1JJM11115
,lVMOVOed8 H1lOS ZZ
HON]0EAb 1HVOSOH9 T-11_
all; JO 1 toLPON Puo uayonouae y
, e
o v
_
„ w
0 H a
1
II
W
J
LJ
J
Community Development Department
O'
W
0
CC
Community Development Department
V10S3NNIW 2131VM1111S
AVMOVO 8 HIf10S ZZ2
JONJ OISJ 1HbaS0L8 ]Hl
047 Lo{ oi,llPPV Puo ol}onouay V
pv.:0p1011 a o o a , v . i
CN
�� xa,sry
.H x"
a ° -
" tl 1 tl
e
":
ay�u o
,�n�
'
15,
.... n . > , o . , 1 . 1 s
O'
W
0
CC
Community Development Department
.. ,.,
V1CG3NNI11 1 11111111
aMOV0eJE Hlnos zz
JnN�ais3� 1Heaso�e AHl
a47 .i ., ..P:PPV P.. PPP,P,oua22
g rf
Yaz na s r ry
A �V 1 1
L_,
___
U
ma
_ e _ ... a s �,.xn.a
°°
0
Community Development D
i
r
velepmeni Department
V.053PP91N tJ31tlMTIS
J VMOVO J8 HIfOS ZZ�
2ON2OISHJ 1HVOSOJB HHl
gnw „
a �rw
I ��
�,
su n,+
e�
i
i
r
velepmeni Department
ms
ViC53N N,N b3 VMl illi
2,VMOVO E Hl nos zz
N �J8 �Hl
0Nals] iHbOS0
s a,.a
1
N
'
1,
A "
l Y fl
o
, ■ ■ . i s
^
..sue=
r
II
Community Development Dep
L_
LOS NN'W HisVO -i11IS
AVMOVOdO HIl0S =
N9NNO S J 1HVOSO�a ail
a114 aq Go_ :PPV PSo ao_ nouab 5
a o . 7 , 4 .
'
,aR
,� H
L_
- 6 "51DYP 7 Set Pack
a a
Mal5 6W/U1VaW ,6 I
•E E 00
111
ZONING REVIEW DATA
'495 1c1V.OV
0
m
z
CL
L L I
F-
)
WLOS3NNIIN EEL,W1-1■1
kvACV08 HIflOS ZZ
]0N]aSALI 1HVOS09 ]Hl
....
.PAG
AV1Vg
-.
n
-F
- 6 "51DYP 7 Set Pack
a a
Mal5 6W/U1VaW ,6 I
•E E 00
111
ZONING REVIEW DATA
'495 1c1V.OV
0
m
z
CL
L L I
F-
)
,..
YLOS3N 1 a310;A111 LS
JVMOVoN8 H1nos ZZ2
33NaisHeJ 1HVOSO 9 HHl
a41 ac; 0o.'. PV p,., o_,onouo; y
1`
,.
�_ \l
. s, d ,
A M V A
r
���
•° „
1
1
r
161
1[01 ■1
fi�� rig
maIL
it
.
•
•
Jo
•I
•
■
•
oL
1 ro, x(01
i[0]
—11
—NM
iliwater
T H E B I R T H P L A C E O F M I H N E S O T A
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
March 29, 2013 CASE NO.: 2013 -06
REQUEST: Reconsider 270 day provision in Demolition Ordinance
HPC MEETING DATE: April 3, 2013
PREPARED BY: Bill Turnblad
BACKGROUND
After the recent demolition cases related to St. Paul Lutheran Church, it became clear that
the time allotted to complete a local designation study, if needed, was not sufficient. If the
HPC and Council both deny a requested demolition permit, then a historian must research
the property and write a report. If the findings of the report support the decision to save
the building, the City has to locally designate the property. From the date the demolition
permit is issued until local designation is adopted can take no more than 180 days
according to the ordinance.
The process is based upon US Department of Interior and Minnesota State Historic
Preservation Office suggestions. But 180 days is not sufficient time.
To fix this issue, the Heritage Preservation Commission recommended that the City Council
amend the ordinance to allow 270 days.
The City Council held a hearing and a first reading last month on the amendment. A
majority of the Council was uncomfortable with the time extension. So, they tabled the
hearing and referred it back to the HPC to consider ways to keep the whole process within
180 days.
REQUEST
Review the attached ordinance for amendment suggestions that would make the 180 day
time frame work.
bt
City Council Meeting February 19, 2013
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. 2013 -06. A public hearing to review a request from the City of Stillwater to consider a
minor revision to Chapter 34 related to building demolitions.
Community Development Director Turnblad reviewed the request. To alleviate the problem of
inadequate time to complete a local designation study, staff and the HPC recommends that the
current 180 -day time limit be extended to 270 days, giving the City sufficient time to hire a firm
to complete a designation study within a reasonable budget. This is the first reading.
There were no public comments during the public hearing.
Councilmember Menikheim expressed concern about the possibility of holding up someone who
wants to demolish something on their property. He stated he understands the purpose of the
ordinance but questions the burden to the property owner.
Mayor Harycki indicated that he feels strongly about preserving properties. If a structure has
stood for 100 years and an owner believes it should be knocked down, the City should be given
some time to decide if that is best.
Councilmember Kozlowski reminded the Council that it will only stretch it out if the Council
does not approve the demolition permit.
Councilmember Weidner asked what a designation study costs, and Community Development
Director Turnblad replied it shouldn't cost more than $3,000 to $6,000. The bid got to over
$12,000 per house on the St. Paul Lutheran case due to the rushed timelines. The $5,000 escrow
required of the property owner should cover the studies most of the time.
Councilmember Polehna expressed concern with making a homeowner pay $5,000 to be
allowed to tear down a structure on their property. He added he was uncomfortable with the St.
Paul Lutheran homes demolition request because he does not like to oppose commissions'
recommendations.
City Administrator Hansen commented that he worries about putting people in charge of the
decision who are predisposed to think everything has historical value.
Councilmember Weidner noted this could hold up an entire project for up to 270 days if, for
instance, there is one potentially significant home involved in a large development. He asked if
there are options for the property owner to choose their own firm to do the designation study,
for a faster review.
City Attorney Magnuson stated he suggested to former City Planner Pogge, when drafting the
ordinance, to allow the City Planner to make some threshold determination of whether a
property might have significant historical value which could shorten the process.
Mayor Harycki noted that having only the extreme cases, where it's too close to call, trigger the
study, might be better for citizens since it is not as time consuming or expensive for clear cut
cases.
Community Development Director Turnblad responded that staff wants to avoid having to make
judgment calls that could be debated about whether a structure is worth saving as that would put
a controversial decision at an administrative level.
City Attorney Magnuson reminded the Council there is a right to appeal any administrative
decision.
Page 6 of 9
City Council Meeting February 19, 2013
Councilmember Menikheim suggested returning the ordinance to the HPC to ask them to
rework it and include the points discussed during the meeting.
Motion by Councilmember Menikheim, seconded by Councilmember Weidner, to table the
ordinance and send it back to the HPC. All in favor.
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion concerning options for using event survey results
Mayor Harycki explained that the City Council commissioned ReadEx Research to conduct a
survey of Stillwater residents and businesses to sample the community's opinions on events.
The two main objectives were: 1) To gauge whether Stillwater wants a community event to
replace Lumberjack Days, and if so, what activities would be preferred; and 2) To determine the
level of support for events in general. He noted that results indicated about two- thirds of
Stillwater residents favor some sort of summer event. Now it falls upon the Council to
determine what that should be.
Councilmember Menikheim stated he doesn't think there is any way to hold an event this
summer due to timing. He feels the City should slow down and do it right. He suggested a group
should be formed to be charged with coming up with a festival.
Mayor Harycki noted a downtown business owner called him earlier today offering to
underwrite a summer festival for this year if the City wants to do it. His bigger concern is that
there will not be a park if the Corps of Engineers project proceeds.
Councilmember Polehna reminded the Council that the parking lots are going to be redone and
there will be work on the grass and irrigation systems. He suggested the Council have a
workshop and talk about it as a group.
Councilmember Weidner agreed a workshop may help determine if Stillwater should be in the
event - planning business. He found survey results interesting and wants the public to understand
the potential for having a well -run event.
Councilmember Polehna stated he would like some research 011 what such events bring into the
community and how other communities handle events.
Mayor Harycki recalled staff did a report on other communities' events a few years ago.
City Administrator Hansen observed that Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth probably have some
RFPs for events which City staff could request as examples.
Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Menikheim, to authorize a
workshop for the second meeting in March on whether and how to have a Citywide festival. All in
favor.
Possible approval of Iron Man Special Event
Community Development Director Turnblad reported that Hostelling International, USA wants
Stillwater and the St. Croix Valley to be the venue for its 47th annual charity cycling event in
Minnesota. There would be an estimated 4,000 -6,000 participants with some of the looped
routes going through Stillwater spread out throughout the day. City staff feels no contract is
necessary because City services are not impacted other than the need for traffic control at
several key intersections. As this would be the only City resource used, Police Chief Gannaway
can work out a price for traffic control without the need for a contract.
Page 7 of 9
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
TO: Heritage Preservation Commission
FROM: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director
DATE: March 29, 2013
RE: Open House for Lowell Inn Bathroom's Conceptual Design
The Park Commission invites you to attend an open house that they will hold in the Council
Chamber at 7:00 PM on April 22, 2013. The purpose of the open house is to view and comment
on a number of possible conceptual designs for the new bathroom planned to replace the existing
one at the south end of Lowell Park.
Comments will be assembled and used by the design consultant to produce a single concept
design that will be brought to the Heritage Preservation Commission for review.