Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-11-07 HPC Packet- No meeting
Agenda Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, November 7, 2011 The regular meeting of the Heritage Preservation Commission will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, November 7, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. 1. CALL TO ORDER AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF October 3, 2011 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM /2011 -55. A demolition request for a single family residence located at 1207 Schulenberg Alley in the RB, Two Family Residential District and review for the construction of a new residence in Neighborhood Conservation District. Nathan and Sara Jespersen, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/2011 -56. Design review for the construction of a restaurant and signage located at 2604 Orleans Street West in the BP -C Business Park Commercial District. Dale Shimek, McDonald's USA LLC, applicant. 5.02 Case No. DR/2011 -57. Design review of signage for the Holiday Station located at 1801 Market Drive in the BP -C, Business Park Commercial District. L & D Signs, Duane Downey, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Discussion of Demolition Ordinance 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 3, 2011 Present: John Brach, Robert Goodman, Reggie Krakowski, and Roger Tomten Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Jeff Johnson, Howard Lieberman and Scott Zahren Acting Chair Roger Tomten called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes Mr. Brach noted a correction to the spelling of his name and moved to approve the minutes of Sept. 9, 2011, as corrected. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DEM/2011 -53 A demolition request for s single - family residence at 911 Churchill St. W. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Lakeview Hospital, Curt Geissler, applicant. The applicant was present. Mr. Pogge reviewed the request and staff findings. He also briefly reviewed the hospital's long -term plans for the property in question, plans previously submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council. He noted that historian Don Empson had reviewed the property and found no historical or architectural significance to the structure. Mr. Pogge stated staff believes the applicant has submitted a complete application for the issuance of a demolition permit and recommends approval, contingent on the applicant running the submitted advertisement for sale /relocation in the Stillwater Gazette for two consecutive weeks, with a 30 -day waiting period before demolition actually commences. Mr. Geissler said it is the hospital's hope that the property will be sold and relocated, and he said they will make their best efforts to accomplish that. Mr. Geissler also noted the hospital's plans to incorporate the property into the campus are long -term. In discussion, it was noted that, if approved, the demolition permit would be valid for two years. Mr. Pogge pointed out that the City is considering a new demolition ordinance, and according to that ordinance, this structure would not require a demolition permit due to its construction date of 1947. Mr. Tomten opened the public hearing. Tony Beyer and his wife, Andrea McCready, 904 Churchill, expressed concern about the hospital's plans for a two - story, above - ground parking structure in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Beyer referred to the number of homes that have been removed from the neighborhood in the past several years to make way for parking and suggested that degrades the quality of the neighborhood. He also stated a new parking structure would have a negative impact on his property's value. He again stated his opposition to the proposal. Ms. McCready expressed concern about the likely loss of two additional houses, which she said are charming and add to the character of the neighborhood; she said if the hospital's plans are for, in fact, 20 years down the road, she would not like the hospital to be too hasty in removing these homes as they might not even be needed in the future. Mr. Beyer asked about plans for the 911 Churchill property in the time period between removal and implementation of the hospital's long -term plans. Mr. Geissler said the intended use would be landscaped green space until the expansion takes place. City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 3, 2011 No other comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Tomten noted that, at this time, the HPC is reviewing this only as a demolition permit request; the land use issues and plans for the expansion of the hospital are more the purview of the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Tomten asked whether there were any concerns about approving the demolition permit and turning this property into green space, given some uncertainty about the future. Mr. Geissler stated the hospital is committed to remain at this site for the long -term, noting the hospital has just invested about $20 million into the site in the past several years; he said the hospital has not purchased any property for another potential building site and reiterated that the hospital is committed to remain at this site for in- patient services for the long- term. Mr. Geissler again noted the hospital's preference to relocate the home, rather than demolish it. On a question by Mr. Tomten, Mr. Geissler said they were aware of and comfortable with the staff's recommendation that approval be contingent on the ad being published once a week for two consecutive weeks, with the demolition permit not to be effective until 30 days after the last publication date. Mr. Brach noted demolition requests are always difficult and to deny, the Commission must show a basis for denial; he said it appears that the applicant has complied with the requirements of the ordinance, with the exception of the advertisement. Mr. Brach moved approval with the condition regarding the advertisement and the effort to attempt to relocate the home as close to the existing location as possible. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/2011 -50 Design review of signage "Stillwater Acupuncture and Nutrition" at 450 Main St. N. in the CBD, Central Business District. Lisa Freitag, applicant. A representative of the business was present. Mr. Tomten reviewed the request. Mr. Tomten noted that the typical finish for aluminum signage is a glossy finish, which negates what the Commission is trying to achieve in terms of a more historic look; he suggested that the applicant look for more of a flat finish for the background and lettering. Mr. Krakowski moved to approve as conditioned. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2011 -51 Design review of fapade improvement at 114 Chestnut St. E. in the CBD, Central Business District. Jon Whitcomb, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Pogge said the applicant is requesting to do some repair and replacement of windows, siding and shutters. He noted the building was constructed in 1848. He said the applicant is requesting a fapade improvement loan for the work and window replacement work does not follow Secretary of Interior guidelines for rehabilitation. Due to that issue, he said the applicant has agreed to do restoration of the windows and trim. He said approval is recommended with the condition that windows shall be retained and restored; he said it is also recommended that the HPC recommend Council approval of a fapade improvement loan. Mr. Tomten asked if the siding will be replaced or restored; Mr. Pogge said there will be some replacement, but the intent is to restore and repaint the majority of the siding. Mr. Brach moved to approve as conditioned in the staff report. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2011 -52 Design review of fapade improvement at 219 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Monty Brine, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Pogge said the applicant intends to remove and restore the existing glass transom window; he said it is work that really needs to be done and approval is City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 3, 2011 recommended. Mr. Brach moved to approve the application as conditioned in the staff report. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2011 -54 Design review of signage for "Kin's Wok" at 14410 60 St. N. in the BP- C, Business Park Commercial District. L &D Signs, applicant. Duane Downey of L &D Signs was present. Mr. Tomten reviewed the request for a wall sign and freestanding sign. Mr. Downey noted the signs are existing cabinets with new faces. Mr. Tomten asked if the backgrounds are translucent; Mr. Downey responded in the affirmative. Mr. Brach moved approval as conditioned. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of design intentions for a residence at 2007 Schulenberg Alley — Josh Clendenen, Delaney Company, LLC, builder, and Nathan Jespersen, potential buyer of the property, were present. Mr. Clendenen said the intention is to demolish the existing structure and said, while he had not done the pricing, he is confident that it would not be worth remodeling the structure. He reviewed two design plans preferred by the homeowners, noting the plans are intended to take advantage of the views of the river afforded by the property. He provided several photos of nearby structures, within "eye -shot view" of the property in question, including one with a similar roofline included in the Jespersens' preferred plans. Mr. Pogge noted the subject property is in the Neighborhood Conservation District; he provided photos of the surrounding houses, noting that one of the criteria for the infill district is that the infill structure be of similar size. In discussion, it was noted the plans are outside of the 40' setback from the bluff line. Mr. Pogge stated the proposal meets all the requirements for the RB zoning district and also meets riverway and steep slope setback requirements. Mr. Pogge pointed out that the proposal involves two parcels, which must be considered one, to meet St. Croix Riverway lot size requirements. Mr. Pogge also noted that the new structure will have to be a natural, earth tone color, according to the St. Croix Riverway rules. Mr. Clendenen asked about infill guideline No. 1, regarding massing and scale, and questioned whether a gabled roof would be too high and cause some potential problems with neighbors regarding views of the river. He suggested the roofline they have proposed, a flat roof, would help with that concern. He also questioned guidelinesNo. 2 and wondered whether they would have to worry about use of lot space in their designs; Mr. Tomten said the guidelines are trying to get people to focus on attempting to get a new structure to complement existing structures, suggesting the design challenge /dilemma lies in the fact that structures on nearby Lakeside Drive are much different than the immediate structures on Schulenberg Alley. Mr. Clendenen said the Jespersens' preferred design is one with a flat roof, with separate garage of similar design. The second potential design is one with a hip roof, he said. Mr. Tomten noted that flat roof design has a bit smaller footprint as it faces the street, which is helped by the detached and set back garage, whereas the other plan is a more traditional, suburban approach with the width of the garage being viewed as part of the house. Mr. Tomten suggested that the flat roof design seems to be more pure, but it does introduce something new on the street of the immediate neighborhood; he suggested the possibility of a one -story mass facing the street, growing to a two -story mass toward the back of the structure. Mr. Clendenen asked whether it might help orienting the structure more toward the Lakeside Drive homes. Mr. 3 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission October 3, 2011 Jespersen suggested that a new structure would be an improvement to the adjacent neighborhood. Mr. Clendenen asked about the proposed use of glass in the flat roof design, whether it was pleasing or too much; Mr. Krakowski said he liked the look. Mr. Brach agreed with Mr. Tomten's suggestion regarding reducing the front massing from the street -side by going 3' below grade, with windows above that. Mr. Clendenen asked about the use of a front porch that has more roof over it on the streetside to make the top level appear that it is back farther. Mr. Tomten said thinking about how the front fapade will relate to Schulenberg Alley should likely be the driving design force for the structure, noting there will be a lot more flexibility in the portion that faces Lakeside Drive. Mr. Pogge suggested the possibility of orienting the house toward Hazel Street; there was discussion of issues related to a different orientation of the structure on the property, including the location of trees and location of a driveway. Mr. Tomten spoke of the importance of keeping the idea of a small home facing Schulenberg Alley and remembering it is a front yard, a semi - public place. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Pogge noted that several months ago, 45 Degrees received approval for sign. One of the conditions was that the sign itself was not to cover the transom window above the main door. However, he said, they are running into issues with the location of the light and sign size in moving the sign up on the building. He said he believes the applicant has met the intent of the condition and would approve it on a staff level, but wanted to bring this to the Commission's attention. Mr. Tomten said in other instances, the Commission has tried very hard to get people to react to the architectural form and building fapade in terms of a sign band; Mr. Pogge said in the original Majestic building, the sign band itself was the windows -- there were no transom windows. He noted the applicant is caught in the dilemma of having the original sign band removed; he said one of the proposals was to cover up the 1910, which he said he thought would be an injustice to the building. Mr. Brach said he would rather have the sign lowered as long as it is not modifying the fapade of the building to where they are taking away the transom. Mr. Tomten said he thought there were other options, including using the window space and use of a projecting sign. No action was taken. Mr. Pogge noted the proposed demolition ordinance had gone to the Planning Commission, which held a public hearing and tabled action on approval. Mr. Tomten suggested it might be good for members to attend the Planning Commission meeting to explain the HPC's reasons for recommending approval. Meeting was adjourned at 8 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Tomten. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary E , 1, t 0 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: November 2, 2011 CASE NO.: 11 -06 PROPERTY OWNER: Rick Swanson & Richard Naumen APPLICANT: Nathan & Sara Jespersen REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a residential single family home and an Infill Design Review Permit for a single - family home LOCATION: 2007 Schulenberg Alley HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 7, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planned BACKGROUND Nathan & Sara Jespersen, are looking to purchase the property at 2007 Schulenberg Alley. The Jespersen s plan to demolish the existing home & garage and construct a new home and garage on the property. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and as such needs an infill design review permit for the new home. 2007 Schulenberg Alley Demolition and NCD Permit Page 2 The current structure was built in 1882 according to the Washington County Assessor's office. The intent of the property owner is to replace the existing structure with a new single family home. SPECIFIC REQUESTS The applicant is requesting consideration of the following items: 1. A demolition permit for the existing single - family home. 2. Infill design review for a replacement single- family home. This report will review the two requests starting first with the demolition request then the infill design review request. Evaluation of Demolition Request Chapter 34, Section 34 -4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review. Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34 -2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... The structure was built in 1882 according to the Washington County Assessor's office making it more than 50 years old, which makes it potentially historically significant and requires review by the Heritage. Preservation Commission before it can be demolished. Demolition Plan Section 34 of the City Code lists nine items that must submitted as part of a "demolition plan" prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. The items are as follows: (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; This legal description is included in the attached application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; This information is included in the attached application. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The both the home and garage are proposed to be demolished. 2007 Schulenberg Alley Demolition and NCD Permit Page 3 (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant has included a cost estimate from Delaney Company LLC Custom Home Builders in their application material. The cost for the new home is estimated at $283,990.50 while the cost to rehab the existing home is $325,945.00. (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant stated in their application that they plan to build a new single-family home in its place. Elevations of the home are included in the applicant's packet and zuill be discussed further later in the report. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small Lot and is zoned RB, two family residential. The plans as submitted would meet all zoning requirements. This site is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and since the main structure is being removed the new home is subject to the infill design criteria. The site is also in the St. Croix Riverway overlay zoning district. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant included two alternatives to demolition; however, they each come at a higher cost as opposed to demolishing and building anew. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The home was offered for sale in the Stillwater Gazette. Demolition Findings Section 34 -5 Subd 2 outlines the criteria for approval or denial of a demolition permit. There are two criteria the Commission must consider in either approving or denying a permit. 1. Is the building or structure historically significant? The code defines historically significant as "any building or structure or portion of a building or structure on the National Historic Register, a designated local landmark or a contributing structure or building in a designated national register historic district." While the building has been identified as being potentially eligible for listing on the national register, it has not been officially listed. Thus the building is not a historically significant building per City Code requirements. 2007 Schulenberg Alley Demolition and NCD Permit Page 4 2. The owner has made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure and there is no alternative to demolition. Reviewing the application material, staff finds that the owner has submitted the minimum information on the nine require submittal items. Additionally, the application has met the minimum standard in making a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure. Since 1) the structure is NOT a historically significant building per City Code requirements; 2) that the owner has made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure; and 3) there is NO alternative to demolition staff finds that the applicant has met the requirements of Chapter 34 of the City Code related to building demolitions. As such if the Commission agrees with this finding then the Commission must notify the building officinal in writing that the permit may be issued. Evaluation of Neighborhood Conservation District Design Guidelines All infill homes in the NCD are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines serve as a common reference for all those involved in the process of new construction in the district including property owners, neighbors, residents, architects, designers, builders, city staff, and the commission. The guidelines are intended to serve as a framework to guide the design process, while allowing for individuality and creativity in architectural design. Twenty -seven guidelines make up the NCD design manual. These guidelines cover three (3) general areas including Neighborhood and Streets, Building and Site, and Architectural Detail. Neighborhood and Streets This property is a fairly rectangular lot that slopes east toward the river. The buildable area is in the front portion of the property due to a steep slope along the east side of the lot that requires a 40 -foot setback from the top of the slope. The property is in a transition area with part of the historic dutchtown area north of Hazel St and the 1970s Lakeview Terrace development south of Hazel St. This property is located adjacent to and north of Hazel St. 2007 Schulenberg Alley Demolition and NCD Permit Page 5 Guideline #1 - Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures - The size of the proposed home in relation to homes in the areas is a concern. The average livable area of the surrounding homes is 1,694 square feet and range between 817 to 2,679 square feet. The living area for the proposed home is approximately 2,538 square feet. While not the largest home it will be one of the larger homes and much larger than the current 858 square foot home that is on the property. The physical massing and scale of the proposed home seems to be incompatible with the surrounding homes; especially north of Hazel St. Guideline #2 - Respect the existing rhythm hm of the streetscape - Detached garages recessed behind the front of the home is a preferred garage style in the City and is the pattern generally established in the dutchtown neighborhood north of Hazel. Additionally, current RB zoning district requirements, requires the garage to be setback a minimum of 10 feet behind the front of the home. The proposal calls for the garage to be detached and parallel to the front. The garage needs to be pushed back so it is setback a minimum of 10 feet behind the front of the home. Guideline #4 - Design new roofs to be compatible with - orms of existing roofs in the neighborhood - Six of the eight neighboring roof styles are gable roof while the other two are hipped roofs. Only one other home in the area has a flat roof similar to what is proposed. Guideline #5 - Building heights should be considered in choosing root - forms, architectural style, and relating context - The proposed style is a starkly different architectural style then what exists east of Highway 95. In fact, only one home in the neighborhood is a similar style. North of Hazel the homes are very simple early mill homes. Building and Site The home shows good four -sided architecture in the type and style of trim, detail and roof elements as required for these criteria. The orientation, with the wide side facing Schulenburg Alley, is consistent with the homes south of Hazel St in the Lakeview Terrace but is out of place for the historic dutchtown area north of Hazel St. Architectural Details The level of detail shown on the plans overall reflects appropriate choices in trim and detail and is appropriate for the style of the home. The style selected really fails to have a strong tie in to the character of the neighborhood that is developed around the proposed home. 2007 Schulenberg Alley Demolition and NCD Permit Page 6 Specifics on the windows, and a lighting plan were not included in the application and has been made a condition of approval. Neighborhood Conservation District Design Review Findings Staff agrees this is a transitional neighborhood; however, Staff find that the style and mass of the home is out of character for the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore; staff is recommending against the plans as submitted. ALTERNATIVES The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: A. Approve. If the proposed demolition and infill design review requests are found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 2. Final fixtures and placement shall be approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. The garage shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet behind the front of the home or a variance shall be required from the Planning Commission. B. Approve in part. Approved the demolition permit subject to approval of an infill design review permit. Deny the infill design review permit as presented since it fails to meet the Stillwater conservation district design guidelines. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the demolition rules and the approved design guidelines, then the Commission could deny the requests. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your December 5, 2011 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is December 17, 2011. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends option B. attachment: Application Supporting documents from the applicant #1 Northeast — 2011 Lake Street Use: Marina Size: 2 stories (no basement), 2,400 sf #5 Subject Property — 2007 Schulenbu Alley Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 story & basement — 2,481 SF #6 South —101 Lake Side Drive Use: Single Family Home Size: 2 % story with walkway under — #9 Southwest —1921 Broadwav St N I 79 SF Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 story & basement —1,288 SF #4 North — 2011 Schulenburg Alley #2 East — 2009 Lake Street #3 Southeast —124 Lake Side Drive Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 story (no basement) — 858 SF #8 West — 410 Hazel St E Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 story (no basement) — 817 SF #7 Northwest — 2012 Schulenburg Alley Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 % story (no basement) —1,152 SF Use: Single Family Home Size: 2 story (no basement) —1,810 SF Use: Single Family Home Size: 1 story (no basement) — 928 SF 10/20/11 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth St N Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: The property is located at 2007 Schulenberg Alley. The home was built in 1882 per Washington County's Assessor website. The home on Schulenberg Alley is one example of a typical worker's cottage from the Nineteenth Century. Its broad side faces the street with a door in the middle and matching windows on each side of the door. On the rear is a kitchen addition. There is a minimum of decoration on the exterior of the home. The simple symmetry of the house, typical of other Dutchtown houses built in the 1870s or before, seems to belie a building date after 1900. This home is just a few blocks east of the old Dutchtown School near the intersection of Willow and 2 nd St N. That area is now a park with a picnic pavilion where the school once stood. One of the four wells in Dutchtown was on the edge of the park in a space now occupied by the Second Street right of way. ^ gz PARCEL A PROPOSED PROPOSED NEW PARCEL LINE-, --------- SURVEY NOTES: CERTIFICATION: EASEMENT NOTE: OND�EWORKWASPROVIDEOFORWSSU�. REVISIONS: EXIST FOR PURPOSES MO 0� FURPOSES, POSSOLE EASEMENTS MY STOW SEWER "27.00 UTILITY NOTE: PROJECT LOCATION: Il 9 0 NORTH 0 10 20 CORNERSTONE HAZEL ST I G=pher=tate One Call CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY dN/OOCS " 37 -M -- TRUSTEE'S DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (Rev. 6.99) By Individual(S) (Top 3 inches Reserved for Recording Data) Miller/Oavis Co.. St. Paul, MN 681.642.1588 DEED TAX DUE HEREON: %aZ. 7 0 Date: 1 / Xco ' r FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Barbara O'Brien Miller as Trustee(s) of the Barhara O'Brien Miller Living Trust dated March 5 (Name of Trust) Grantor(s), hereby convey(s) to Richard Swanson and R ichard Nauman Grantee(s), real property in Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto, 6X,@ ".4 ee,ef:f%ef t/,a>< 9�fe,ee %s No we // •a '4e e "t�, (if more space is needed, continue on back) tn¢ether with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. WASHINGTON COUNTY TRUSTEE(S) Receipt No: 220712 Date: 5/1,6/2006 Registration tax hereon of.. $722.70 PAID Barbara O'Brien Miller MN Conservation Fund M.S. 473h $5.00 PAID Molly F. O'Rourke, Auditor by CJStarzl STATE OF CAL'IFORIVIA -- s,. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO The foregoing was acknowledged before me on April 2 , 2006 (Date) by Barbara O'Brien Miller as Trustee(s) of the Barbara O'Brien Miller i.iving Tnist dated March 5, 1995 Grantor(s).. (Name of Trusq / NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHE NKI� EFREM A. RUBIO OFFICIAL SEAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL NOTARY PUBLIC•CAUFORNIA Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should al COMM. No. 1569651 be sent to (include name and address of Grantee): a'N 0 OOt ItUTY /(/.nccmA/V THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS)/ VL iii I c Nee��eR Corot Charles R. Bartholdi 0- Jensen, Bell, Converse & Erickson, P.A. 1500 Wells Fargo Place 30 East Seventh Street St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 223 -4999 506X WARNING: UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF THIS FORM PROHIBITED. 3585031 la!ll�Illl�llli�� INlII�I�� Office of the County Recorder Washington County, MN of dennquent of Real Estate tans and transfer entered Owdfieate Value ( A) filed ) not required ( Cettl9ed Bled and/or neerded on: Datg 2006/05/16 2:27:00 PAN Molly F �Z� 'Rourke udltCr- reaeu r 3585031 Depu C nq aea mMa Center a a 1 ao. /Y, ooi(,p �°— :su dN/OOCS " 37 -M -- TRUSTEE'S DEED Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blanks (Rev. 6.99) By Individual(S) (Top 3 inches Reserved for Recording Data) Miller/Oavis Co.. St. Paul, MN 681.642.1588 DEED TAX DUE HEREON: %aZ. 7 0 Date: 1 / Xco ' r FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Barbara O'Brien Miller as Trustee(s) of the Barhara O'Brien Miller Living Trust dated March 5 (Name of Trust) Grantor(s), hereby convey(s) to Richard Swanson and R ichard Nauman Grantee(s), real property in Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto, 6X,@ ".4 ee,ef:f%ef t/,a>< 9�fe,ee %s No we // •a '4e e "t�, (if more space is needed, continue on back) tn¢ether with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. WASHINGTON COUNTY TRUSTEE(S) Receipt No: 220712 Date: 5/1,6/2006 Registration tax hereon of.. $722.70 PAID Barbara O'Brien Miller MN Conservation Fund M.S. 473h $5.00 PAID Molly F. O'Rourke, Auditor by CJStarzl STATE OF CAL'IFORIVIA -- s,. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO The foregoing was acknowledged before me on April 2 , 2006 (Date) by Barbara O'Brien Miller as Trustee(s) of the Barbara O'Brien Miller i.iving Tnist dated March 5, 1995 Grantor(s).. (Name of Trusq / NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHE NKI� EFREM A. RUBIO OFFICIAL SEAL SIGNATURE OF NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICIAL NOTARY PUBLIC•CAUFORNIA Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should al COMM. No. 1569651 be sent to (include name and address of Grantee): a'N 0 OOt ItUTY /(/.nccmA/V THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY (NAME AND ADDRESS)/ VL iii I c Nee��eR Corot Charles R. Bartholdi 0- Jensen, Bell, Converse & Erickson, P.A. 1500 Wells Fargo Place 30 East Seventh Street St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 223 -4999 506X WARNING: UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF THIS FORM PROHIBITED. Legal description: The North 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 53, Carli & Schulenburg's Addition to Stillwater, together with the west 20 feet of vacated Lake Street accruing thereto. and The South 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 53, Carli & Schulenburg's Addition to Stillwater, together with the west 20 feet of vacated Lake Street and that part of vacated Hazel Street accruing thereto described as All that part of the North half of platted Hazel Street and all that part of platted Lake Street, adjacent to Block 53, Carli & Schulenburg's Addition to Stillwater, according to the plat thereof on file and of record as Doc. No. 415049 in the office of the County Recorder of Washington County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at the southeast corner of the vacated west 20 feet of Lake Street as it abuts said Block 53; thence westerly along the southerly line, of said Block 53 to a point 22.6 feet east of the southwest corner of Lot 3 of said Block 53; thence south at right angles 15.0 feet; thence east at right angles 27.0 feet; thence south at right angles 15 feet, more or less, to the southerly line of said North Half of platted Hazel Street; thence easterly along said southerly line and its easterly projection to its intersection with a southerly projection of the easterly line of said vacated west 20 feet of Lake Street; thence northerly along said projected line 30 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, subject to and reserving to the City of Stillwater an easement for snow storage purposes over this vacated portion. together with an easement over and across the South Fifteen (15) feet of Lot Three (3), Block Fifty -two (52), Carli and Schulenburg's Addition to Stillwater as set forth in Document no. 563778. IN TRANSFER RECORD �V OOUNTY, MINNESOT BY N. 0016 - Co ( �7 This is a drawing of the typical Dutchto n. house, many of which must have been constructed by the Mi[I to hoarse its worhers. Sitting broadside to the road, these houses had two rooms downstairs, divided h'y a center wall which contained the chimney and %OVQ» One room would have been used for cooking and eating, the other for living and sleeping. Upstairs there was s loft used for sleeping arid, when necessary, as a guest r ti_ The earliest houses probably had walls with rough sheathing and clay chinked into the cracks- In evernj case, the front of the house is exactly symmetrical, with the door in the center, and a window an equal distance on loth sides of the door, 301 E. WIlovi, 'probably be n with this; pattern, but they have been 4 altered to determine their original confijguration_ The ill stratian is of the Jos ph w house that used to a a1 1911 North Serand .Street; this is a r ca r Q(ta avalvc for in:inf by Jo Latz Poll Ifu reprodwced in the book, 1,9,publis4hedby troixside Press in 19 The Butchto °cR n House Additional Historic information about the Dutchtown area: The far north end of Stillwater is known as Dutchtown, founded in 1853. The lumbering firm of Schulenburg & Boeckeler, of St. Louis, Missouri, came to Stillwater and built a large sawmill on the St. Croix River, about one -half mile north of downtown Stillwater. The lumber company also purchased 173 acres south of Brown's Creek and west of the river. On this acreage, a classic mill town emerged centered around the sawmill and the company store. At first, this settlement was known as Charlottenburg for Charlotte Boeckeler who died tragically in 1855, a year after marrying Adolophus Boeckeler. But as time went on, the settlement of German workers came to be called Deutschtown, or its corruption, Dutchtown. Because this northern edge of Stillwater was, for most of its history, separated from the rest of the city, Dutchtown had its own identity and history. Source(s): Plat of Part of Carli & Schulenburg's Addition to Stillwater, Minn. Surveyed and platted in December, 1892. (In the St. Croix Collection, Stillwater Public Library.) A History of the Dutchtown Residential Area by Donald Empson, October 1998• Below you will see additional history on the property and neighborhood. Prepared by Donald Empson of Empson Archives in 2oo8 for the city of Stillwater, Heritage Preservation Committee. In 1960, there ,t,, as mother United States census. In Chaxlottenburg. there tititer-i approximartelY Q houses. Reflecting the hard times at the , lift, and the Depression throughout the United States. 14 of these dwellings were vacant. There were approxi te1y 44 families living there; it does not appear there ere any boarding houses. Perhaps there was a policy that the meager number of jobs available at the Mill should zo to the married men w i th families. There were 89 adults and 84 children in the community. Of the 89 adults, iii (85 percent) ,came from parts of *hat we co i.der er any- of the remainder, f-,,,e were fro S itzerland, three from Holland, and fre=e had been born ia the U,S_ Forty one of the warkin.g men - were listed a s "Iaborers," a general tetra that would ha y e been used to describe the Will workers_ There was, in additions cane saloon keeper, �Vjj= Za s a mi flwright, 1-Iensy C. Draver one carpenter, one tailor, t farmers, and twro peddlers Irving next doer to each other. Gorki Kn ps: also had a Brewery an Block 32. Using the first. tax assessor's records mailable, those from 196 1 1 , it is possible to glimpse inhere the residents listed in the 1960 census lived is C'harlottenburg_ (Figure ). The v st majority of these 1860 houses were valued by the Assessor as being under S50 This would j,ndirute these "w ere verly small Manses, out stot -y% - with a. center wall dividing the home nto bwo smaller roams. The chimney, if there were one, WQv1d be in this center wall, and a to -'ie vented into the chimney- One room would be used for cooking and eating; the other for hving and steep Thew tills were probably, rough sheathing with clay chinked into the cracks. I would euess this was the class Dut4bto house of which there are a fees- remnan, ts today: a broadside house with the gabbles at each end. The front of the house would be syminetriW, with a door in them ddle_ and a window on each side. In other paf•ts of !�ti wAer tl s time- even hi the workin -U =dr —' neighbor-h,00ds. the houses tended to be valued at $100 to $15'a', but io Duficlitown. there is-ere only eight houses valued over `s1 scattered around the commuuity U llistor y of the Alli #e Fine Industw 116neseta 6 Ag3ae^i .11 s+iu a» L'. a$Kioa wt P'ress. 1949. Page 103 -104. 25 V. S. Census for 1860. Washiu -ton �Uat y. Mullwp°cerF Pager C. D. Our intention is to demolish & remove the whole house, garage, and all foundations on the property. E. The demolition of the structures on this property is necessary because the cost is more to restore, complete all code corrections, EPA lead requirements, Waterproofing, sewer connections, and ultimately add the square footage needed for the Jespersen family on this property. Here is a cost analysis for the remodel vs. teardown & new construction: Costs Remodel notes New Const Remodel /Ad d EPA Lead removal Lead Test $ - $ 800.00 Demo- Remodel Gut interior, strip exterior $ - $ 9,500.00 Additions, pour new garage floor & new draitile $ Foundation areas 18,600.00 $ 19,400.00 Clean- Up /Dumpster additional dumpsters for on site demo 1,100.00 $ 2,300.00 Water Proofing break up floor for retro waterproofing system 1,200.00 $ 4,300.00 Lumber & Windows 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Millwork In lumber # $ - $ - Framing Labor straghten walls /floors etc.. existing 15,000.00 $ 15,800.00 Roofing Labor remove existing roofing repair decking 4,400.00 $ 5,600.00 Electrical redo all old wiring 9,000.00 $ 11,500.00 Heating & Air Cond. Remove old 14,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Plumbing PVC to cast fittings, retro work 12,000.00 $ 13,500.00 Low Voltage $ - $ - Siding Labor 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 Brick Exterior /Interior $ - $ - Stone Exterior /Interior tuck point old foundation 5,500.00 $ 6,600.00 Gutters 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Winter Heat 350.00 $ 350.00 Insulation 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 Fireplace 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 Drywall 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Hardwood Floors 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Ceramic Floors 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Ceramic Tub /Shower 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Cabinets 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 Trim Labor 3,300.00 $ 3,300.00 Painting and Staining 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Tops 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 Carpet 3,400.00 $ 3,400.00 Appliances 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 Mirror, Towel, Tissue 150.00 $ 150.00 Lighting Fixtures 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Designer Closets $ - $ - Shower Doors $ - $ - Garage Doors 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Decorating $ - $ - Cleaners 350.00 $ 350.00 Misc. 2,000.00 $ 2,500.00 Total Home Costs 217,350.00 $ 241,350.00 Land Improvements Description Bid Cost Porta Potty 450.00 $ 450.00 Perk/Soil tests $ - $ - Survey 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Tree Clearing 1 tree 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Silt Fence 400.00 $ 400.00 Hazzardos $ survey /removal septic tank removal /pump 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Demo old foundations and slab on site 7,000.00 $ 2,800.00 Excavation Shore existing structure 5,700.00 $ 6,500.00 Temp. Power /Utilities bury new services/temp power 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 Sewer and Water From schulenberg 2000,WAC, SAC, Meter 5,300.00 $ 5,300.00 Sidewalk allowance 800.00 $ 800.00 Driveway longer drive on remodel 1,500.00 $ 2,000.00 Landscaping minimum sod & edging allowance 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Total Lot Improvement Costs $ $ 24,450.00 27,35 0.00 Admin Costs Description Bid Cost Insurance Builders risk policy higher on remodel 1,500.00 $ 2,800.00 Permits allowance 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Architects 1,500.00 $ 1,800.00 Finance Cost Owner Closing Costs Owner Total Admin Costs 1 10,000.00 $ 11,600.00 Totals $ Total Home Costs 217,350.00 $ 241,350.00 Total Lot Improvement Costs 27,350.00 $ 24,450.00 Total Admin Costs 10,000.00 $ 11,600.00 Overhead More overhead on any remodel or addition 12,735.00 $ 30,514.00 Profit 15,282.00 $ 16,644.00 Service Work 1,273.50 $ 1,387.00 $ - $ - Commission Lot Total Project Costs 283,990.50 $ 325,945.00 F. Our plans are to construct a 2 story sql family residence on this property. We would like to start construction this Nov of this year and complete it Spring 2012. G. The property is zoned RB (two - family residential) and is part of the St Croix Riverway overlay district. The property is listed in the comprehensive plan as Low /Medium Density Residential. Additionally, the comprehensive plan lists the property as a potential landmark site with the following information: 2007 Schulenburg Alley. Dutchtown House. This small house with its hatch in the loft is the only remaining example of what I have called "The Dutchtown House" in my Dutchtown survey (p. 25). Unfortunately the house sits on a double lot, and will probably be gone by the time it might be designated. Or the owner will not allow its designation. For more information, see Empson: Dutchtown Residential Area survey. H. We have advertised the Structure for sale in the newspaper in hopes it could be purchased by someone and moved. We have not received any offers. We also considered remodeling the property and adding on to meet the Jespersens needs. As you can see in the cost analysis above this is not feasible for them. STILLWATER GAZETTE AD AUTHORIZATION Saleaperson. MICHELLE AHRENS Printed at 10/20111 09-53 by $LOGIN Acct#.- 328411 Ad#-. 1076622 Status: N SARA JESPERSOU Start. 10/22/11 Stop: 11/02/11 1905 2ND ST N Times Ord: 4 Times Run; **** STILLWATER MN 55082 STD 1.00 x S.UQ Words: 31, contact. SARA Rate- copi Cost. 47<30 Phone: (651)308-ISS2 Class: 8400 HOUSES MR SALE Fax#: Descript: 24 X 12' HISTORIC LUMBER -. Emailarajaanytimetitness.com $ Given bye Created: mahre !0/20/11 06:47 Agency: ------------ — ----- I — ----- — --------------------------- Last Changed- mahre — 10/20/11 08.53 ----- — ----- — --------- PUB ZONE ED TP START INS STOP SMTWTFS S2 Sv 97 W 10/22/11 4 11/02111 W S INET A 94 W 10/26/11 1 10/26/11 W PAYMENT INFORMATION Pay Date 10/20/2011 $41.30 VI 0201SCN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zf x 12' Historic Lumber Jack home on N side of downtown ror salp $1,00, Must be willing to move home from currpnt lot & pay for all related ftvens- C& 651-31W.IV12 ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Misc property pics- 10/20/11 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth St N Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: Design review Letter of intent: Our intension is to demolish the current home on 2001 Shulenberg Alley and build a new 2 story, single family home. We feel we kept 1 story mass closest to the neighboring properties (by keeping the garage on the North side), added a front porch to fit in with others, and positioned the home to fit this large lot the best way possible. We hope the HPC sees that we tried to fit our setting here keeping all neighbors in mind. We also hope to start this project before ground freeze this year. Thank You, Nathan & Sara Jespersen Josh Clendenen- Delaney Company LLC Review rhis•nesignXeviewr A"Ucadon aM Chec! Contact: StUlwater City Planning O r o A C. r h ar r� Address: 1. NeigbborhoodArchitecturalStyles: o Vernacular a Iralianate a Queen Anne o Gothic a Greek Revival a Second Empire 13 Am ric an Foursquare W Stick 2. Prevailing neighborhood street&ont k: setbac (Guidels ine #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback (est.) - ck on block (e - Average setback on block (est.) 'r Proposed new house setback 1 S �Zo 3. Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1,1 -1 /2, or 2 stories high? (Guidelines #4, #5) Stories 1 1 -1/2 2 House on right o a a Houseonleft o N o House to rear a a o Prevailing on block a a o Prevailing opposite block a O a Proposednewhouse a o a 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood; (Guideline # 13) Front Porch None House on right o 0 Houseonleft ❑ a House to rear ❑ 0 Prevailing on block a a Prevailing opposite block u 0 Proposed new house ❑ a Notes: and Checklist Hail 116 N. 4- St. Stillwater, MN 356$2 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in yourneigliborhood: (Guidelines ##10, #11) Front Bear Side Garage Garage Garage House onright a a a House on left a d o Housetorear a a a Prevailingonblock a a a Prevailingblack a O a Proposednewhouse v a 2 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10 #11) 1 stall 2 stall 3 stall Garage Garage Garage Houseonried a a a Houseonleft 0 a a Housetorcar a o Prevailing on block a v o Preva0ingoppositeblock n a a Proposednew house a 0 a 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guldeline #14) CS 8. If the proposed structure/ garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neig)} o hood and streetseape? : StillwidwC vation Dhtrict (piof 2) t O ffice 651- 4304821 City Desip Review Application and Cheddist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the proper (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) o Structure sited parallel to slope ® Building deigned to reduce cut and rill (minimized retaining walls) n Landscaping incorporated into grading d un g es Notes 2. Will the proposed structwre significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidellnes #22, #23) House to right: t10 House to left: ^0 House to rear: n 0 Notes: I n arks S t wr✓�wr HOW wilt you midgate a Y negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? or. Offset /locate windows do reduce impact. 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Guideline #9) t r; ri 4w • T y p e s O f t r e e s �'t r� 'E ok i l k • Heights 2J' 3S 2.s • Trunk diam. 0 - r-r-- -- ---- Notes: ±e 3 tra C rg ,r,rTJ All 3 *tt4l i art % Vt r.io ARP - Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbor's access to sunligbt in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) House to right: n House to to left to o n Q House to rear: A 01As_ Notes: How will you mitigate any n gativesunlight impacts on neighbors? a Locaftstuctiueonlottomfi &oizeimpaet U Adjust building height, or portions of building, to irrtize impact ❑ Other: • Use obselneglass inwindow • Loeatebalconies to mmimize impact. • Uselandscapingdennents for screening o Other. -0-t- ✓* J w l i r►AL Ok 3. How is outdoor lighting impact minimized for neighbors ?(Guideline #25) Lights are located or directed away from neighboringproperty Light fixtures are studded to prevent glare at neighboring property a Other. _ rr o 9 ; srn 4r t o -.,+J . h 5k h,n , h.-i s d a, rY. f r �. 4� 4 ,kpwT /10 ,+, To be included with this Application: and Checklist: ❑ Site include location ofproposed buading(s) on property, lot area; indicate impervious surfatx, property lines, greet/ sidewalk location and approximate locationofadjacent sbucnrres. Indicate proposed outdoordeck/patio and landscapingfeatwres. 1] Building Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. © }} EJCyAtt=, indicate building height,wincknvs,materiais, andcotoron altelevadons, lndicatepruposedexterior lthft Q Photographsofsiteandstreetscape. O RegularPlanni ngDepattrnent DevelopmentAppfimfloaftm Stillwater CJonservaticn District Dt Guidd'nies (p 2 of 2) 65.27' 65.24' e Mopm"Lm o N z O DRIVEWAY sm wW 65.22 ` 0` 7 1 ( 35.24 -NORTH srree - Reveesel Yv O N O ALCer N N 15' 1 15' WEST ELEVATION ( reversed) ..... I r,711iiICI�ID NOW 1.11 � �EW , ®� ®m.m t p m WEST ELEVATION ( reversed) ..... C ;y SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION reversed ) (reverse �.�'4i Yr • e� } f t }y' 3 v i NORTH ELEVATION (re versed ) I r,711iiICI�ID 1.11 � �EW , C ;y SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION reversed ) (reverse �.�'4i Yr • e� } f t }y' 3 v i NORTH ELEVATION (re versed ) 4 1/2" MAIN FLOOR - Reversed F.S.F. 1285 19' -10" UPPER FLOOR - reversed FSF = 1270 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: November 2, 2011 CASE NO.: 2011 -56 APPLICANT: Dale Shimek, McDonald's, USA LLC PROPERTY OWNER: Wells Fargo Bank, NA REQUEST: Design Review for the construction of a 4,800 sq ft building and associated site improvements for McDonald's LOCATION: 2601 Orleans St W ZONING: CRD, Campus Research & Development HPC DATE: November 7, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Torry Kraftson, Asst. City Engineer PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner ptio9 BACKGROUND Dale Shimek of McDonald's, USA LLC is proposing to construct a 4,800 square foot single story building for a new McDonald's Restaurant with an associated drive -thru at 2601 Orleans St W. The subject property was the former Tom Thumb gas station and is currently a vacant site. The site is bounded with Stillwater Boulevard on the west, Orleans St on the north, Market Drive on the east, and a multitenant building to the south. The site is within the West Business Park design review district and is subject to HPC review and comment. McDonald's Restaurant Page 2 of 4 SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to construct the office building and other site improvements, McDonald's, USA LLC is requesting Design Review on the following items: 1. Building 2. Site Improvements 3. Signage EVALUATION OF REQUEST The purpose of the design review in the West Business Park is to encourage new land uses that are compatible with existing uses while encouraging compatible quality new development. The following reviews the project in relation to the approved design guidelines. Building and Site Reivew The building represents a new style that McDonald's has begun to roll out and does not include their typical trademark roof style. The proposed building has a flat roof. The building includes a number of materials including brown and red brick, white EIFS, yellow and gray aluminum trellis system, architectural metal panel system, and other less notable materials. Landscaping & Screening Utilities and RTUs - All utilities and ground or roof top mounted mechanical equipment will need to be screened from public view. Prior to issuance of a building permit, this will have to be verified by the Community Development Department. Outside trash containers - Per City Code,' any outside trash receptacles must be completely screened with the same building materials as the main building. The applicant has included an area as part of the building in the northeast corner that will house all of the trash containers. Landscaping - The landscaping plan shows parameter trees and parking island plantings with trees and bushes. 1 Ch. 31, Sec. 31- 322(4)(1) McDonald's Restaurant Page 3 of 4 Exterior Lighting Building Unlike the new McDonald's in Oakdale, most of the building lighting will be downcast. McDonald's is proposing to use uplighting on the Arcs allocated on the south and west elevations. All other building lights, including security lights, are proposed to be downlit. Light sources will need to be shielded from direct view of the public. Cut sheets of the fixtures shall be provided to the Community Development Department and found satisfactory prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking Lot - As noted on sheet EP2.1, the lighting level at the property lines are calculated to be 0.0 footcandle. Cut sheets of the fixtures were not included. Cut sheets of the fixtures shall be provided to the Community Development Department and found satisfactory prior to issuance of a building permit. Si na e The applicant is also requesting design review and approval for a sign for the project. Signage that is required to receive approval by the HPC include building signage and the freestanding sign. Staff views the Outdoor Menu Boards as on site signage thus something outside the scope of a design review Directional signs without a logo specifically do not require review by the HPC. Building signage On each of the four elevations, a McDonald's golden arch is proposed. The size of each of the signs is 10.75 square feet. The signs will be internally illuminated. On the south elevation, in addition to the McDonald's golden arch, the applicant is proposing to include the words "McDonald's" in white channel letters. The sign area is 41.25 square feet and is proposed to be internally illuminated. The south elevation of the building does not face a public street and thus requires a variance for a sign to be located in this location which the applicant has applied for. Several business in the area currently have signs with variances on no street side building faces so granting such a sign is not setting a precedence. Freestanding sign The applicant is proposing a 25 foot freestanding sign in the intersection of Stillwater Blvd and Orleans St. The maximum height of a sign in this location is only 20 feet tall. Additionally, the design guidelines for the West Business Park requires freestanding sings in this location to be wrapped with masonry that matches the building. The applicant has agreed to make these changes and it is listed as a condition of approval. z The total amount of allowable signage on the site is 272.8 square feet. The total area of the freestanding sign, the building signs, the entry /exit signs, and the menu boards on the site is 252.86 square feet. McDonald's Restaurant Page 4 of 4 For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's proposed signage is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the Design Review Permit with the following conditions: a. All changes to the approved plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will also need to go to the Planning Commission and/or Heritage Preservation Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits. b. All utilities along with all ground and roof top mounted mechanical equipment must be screened from public view. c. Any outside trash receptacles must be completely screened with the same building materials as the main building. d. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. must match the color of the adjacent surface. e. Cut sheets on all of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. f. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the public street. g. The drainage and utility plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. h. A permit from Browns Creek Watershed district shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit. i. An NPDES permit shall be in effect prior to commencing construction. j. Full dimensional brick shall be used on the building. All brick surfaces shall remain unpainted. k. The freestanding sign shall be no taller than 20 feet in height with brick wrapping the sign that is a minimum of 8 feet in width. 2. Deny the design review permit as requested. If the Heritage Preservation Commission decides to deny the requests, findings of fact substantiating the findings must be provided. 3. Table the requests for additional information. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the request with the conditions identified in above. McDonald's USA I.I.C. Stillwater, MN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL.USE PERMIT, SIGN PERMIT, SIGN VARIANCE, DESIGN REVIEW, STREET VACATION AND FINAL PLAT October 19, 2011 L A M D F O R M From Site. to hn4i INTRODUCTION On behalf of McDonald's USA LLC ( "McDonald's "), Landform is pleased to submit this application for special use permit, sign permit, sign variance, design review, street vacation and final plat to allow construction of a McDonald's restaurant at 2601 Orleans. We are excited about the improvements proposed for this site. SPECIAL USE PERMIT This site is zoned BP -C (Business Park Commercial). Restaurants are allowed, but drive -ins (drive - throughs) are allowed only by approval of a Special Use Permit. We have prepared a special use permit that complies with the general purpose and intent of the City ordinance standards for development of the McDonald's restaurant on this site as follows: 1. The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. The proposed restaurant conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter. The proposed site exceeds ordinance requirements for parking and provides adequate vehicle stacking space in the drive - through lane. 2. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed. We have worked with City staff to identify any issues or concerns and our proposal meets all ordinance requirements and will be an attractive addition to the neighborhood. 3. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. The structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. The site has been carefully designed to provide adequate parking and vehicle stacking space in the drive - though, the building is constructed of quality materials and attractive landscaping is provided on site. The special use permit shows compliance with all setback, parking and landscape requirements. The new special use permit will allow us to eliminate two existing curb cuts (on West Orleans Street and Market Drive) and have one new curb cut that aligns with the existing curb cut east of Market Drive. MCD11089 L A N D F O R M October 19, 2011 Project Narrative 2 SIGN PERMIT The proposed sign package includes freestanding, wall, directional and menu board signage. • One freestanding sign is located at the corner of Highway 5 (Stillwater Boulevard) and West Orleans Street. This freestanding pylon sign is 25 feet high and 79.17 sq. ft. in area, which complies with ordinance requirements. • Wall signage is proposed on all four building elevations. The site has frontage on three streets and a variance is requested to allow signage on the elevation that does not face a public street. This sign variance is discussed below. The size of the wall signage complies with the ordinance requirement for sign area based on lineal feet of frontage. • Directional signage is provided on site in compliance with ordinance requirements. • Additional directional signage is provided with the two drive - through pole canopies at the order point. • Two menu boards are provided at the drive - through in order to accommodate the double drive - through lane. We are requesting a variance for the size of the menu boards. The 6'9' high menu boards comply with the height requirements, but the 40.97 sq. ft. standard sign area exceeds the 40 sq. ft. sign area allowed by ordinance. SIGN VARIANCE We are requesting two variances from the signage requirements to allow: 1. 40.97 square foot menu boards where the ordinance allows 40.00 square feet 2. Wall signage on the south elevation, which is not adjacent to a public street. We have reviewed this request for compliance with Section 31.208 of the Zoning Ordinance, which requires that the following conditions be met: 1. A hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists. Personal, family or financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance. 2. A variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege not enjoyed by neighbors. 3. The authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the purpose and intent of this chapter or the public interest nor adversely affect the comprehensive plan. We have also reviewed the request against the standards of MN Statute § 462.357, Subd. 6, which was signed into law by Governor Dayton on May 5, 2011. Under the new law, practical difficulties means (1) the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner permitted by the ordinance, (2) the owner's plight is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the owner, and (3) the MCD11089 L A N D F O R M October 19, 2011 Project Narrative 3 variance will not alter the locality's essential character. If the variance is granted with conditions, those conditions must be directly related to, and bear a rough proportionality to the impact of the variance. The sign variance to allow signage on the south elevation is requested for signage that would be visible from all public streets, including vehicles traveling northbound on Highway 5. The sign variance for the menu boards is a negligible increase in area to allow McDonald's to use the standard menu board, which is 40.97 square feet where 40 square feet is allowed. Both variances would be a reasonable use, are unique to this particular property's physical location and would not alter the locality's essential character. The variances would allow development of a new restaurant that is harmonious with the adjacent development. DESIGN REVIEW We have prepared a Design Review package for the City that meets all ordinance requirements, except for the aforementioned sign variances. The intent of the design review procedure is to promote excellence of design and development, prevent traffic hazards, provide adequate services and encourage development in harmony with its neighborhood or planning area. The site plan includes parking and vehicle stacking in excess of ordinance requirements, an attractive landscape plan and quality building design. This project will improve traffic operations by removing two existing curb cuts and providing one new curb cut on Market Drive, directly across from an existing curb cut. The new restaurant will be in harmony with the existing neighborhood and will be an attractive addition to the community's tax base. VACATION We are requesting vacation of Neil Avenue south of West Orleans Street, adjacent to Market Drive, lying north of Lot 7, Stillwater Marketplace 4th Addition. This public street is no longer needed as Market Drive will provide access to this site and the adjacent properties. FINAL PLAT The final plat will create one new lot that will incorporate the vacated Neil Avenue and will provide new drainage and utility easements as required by the City. SUMMARY We respectfully request approval of the Special Use Permit, Sign Permit, Sign Variance, Street Vacation, Design Review and Final Plat to allow construction of a new McDonald's restaurant at 2601 Orleans. MCD11089 L A N D F O R M October 19, 2011 Project Narrative 4 CONTACT INFORMATION This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55330 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Eric Kellogg at ekellogq @landform.net or 612.638.0242. MCD11089 1. A. N D F O R M October 19, 2011 Project Narrative 5 0 41 - uo1 }o, }sleaa xyo0 — x SllV13G 3 ? Ndld p =,.p a » a,p.d wy =eee s g p V 05091 l lOZ 00 00 �A swae,exp pp, }uo> w w UaN' omay , ''^ .. pee NOSNHOf 'a NVIN9 °o X33 ,n}°u8I 21 435Od s }>a }ly>.e pasua N y peaewa 6 a s ay} s I S 21 Cl Q e we.a , ww, ,e . a ay, N � ,p aan w„ ,a alpp}:nc p u a o puo awp n c}' y }Mn uoawnfuo> ou ae. :y} ee as ,e, P-- arv.wn ev } id- q T d s� V10S3NNIIN `831VMllIlS w = ne=ap maws .p.- .e paaep ay ' }uu y s pee on bsn spt. -C N,o Ap—d b.w fat °w r g oy°''' ViOS3NNlN }o -4-IS 0000 -000 3000 3115 31VIS S,O'1VNOOOW pee ,e, }eav:rvp= aw a,e sppnp =:, == a pue aee e.v a.ay, N m o ayy �o sMO1 aye , = wo 1 yoy pun 13311H3dtl ^ V ^ ° gm=a p — t.B., Alnp o pug uolsltiaan: Wawa ONIONV153321d M3N J11 �YSI I S�P�eUOdaW w ( 3 }o- A. ,spun ,o sw Aq ps,edad sox. Nods, J .7 a i o aj -„,d a o uo.1- lipads •ugld -144 P44 A1I4,so Ags,ay I iNydnV1S3a S,dldN04 I I -- I I 121111 .0-,gz .9-.g 111A I I ---------------------- I f I I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I II I I II o� I I 1 N J I I II I I II I II I II II I I II I I II II .I .. . N J I I I I u� 0 I I I I II In w§ ,' w --------------------- j _ II I I I � 11 l__l71 ° I z o WO NO � L — L I — w Y N e J El i — Z g O O °w o °� N d II O cr a '� "� o II II � w I !, Zel o AI o K dt 3 �- K II Ym U ----- - - - - -- 9 0 llqwnN U -4-0 SNOIIVA313 801831X3 p.f.ld -W 1 10 � 090 00 9 11 1*41 11 . 1 4 ��& 8zs° ")Z/oo/ .n4..Bis �FA�� ° NOgSt 0 NHor 'M NVING 4a a I-P --1 41!- 1 I s a cl VJ.OS3NNIV4 '831VM1 0000 :3000 3115 31VIS S,OIVNOOOVI g a lou . ...... P!,_ v ViOS3NNIV4 10 awls In 13 ilHomy .4. B., A np - iine ONIONVIS338A M3N q o 1" P. 4.44 P.. ONio oii gysn s,pieuoa:)w ®W I I I 4_!P A. .p p.,.d 'o uojj..qp.ft .. Aq -144 1.41 Api — Aq .. V.d 4 1 iNvdnVis3d S,CIIVNO(IOV4 2 R O + + + Ej + S RI *N Il'. z a n ti 8 # 11 I d o ol p z Gi 0 Ld C ........ ........ ........ LL MY z 0- 1 a z s S F-I El- Rl RE [9 Z El . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... ' g � -d i .� I I o + + + + + z + o 0 d ;Z, o- 8. I 1 1 .2 V i ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SO P: - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 9 go ..... . . . . . . . . . ..... ..... �1� .8 ..... . . . . . . . . . ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 z im I F� 9 0 + + + + + + + + + mW ....... ... . . . . . . . . . . . z 0 Ix ui Ix Ld z 0 0 ffi m z 0 0 z H II Q II z 0 L. CL 3— . ... . .. . . . O ... .. . - --------- z o o 3: � . o o o o x I-o 31 . S$ w o A z o H HIH H HH 0 LLJ V) oz (D ti 2 + + + + + + iiN O + + W N n m m ° ° ° ; z < o p�aA� rpRZ 02011 IkO Ikfs USA L C m McDonald's USA LLC — e c I ese eroei^es o^e spepamouo ^s e.e t e po ^ndemioi and ° de cre,aed o ropeda m i wth.ut usn, n 8e c see snm ^ot Th ep«e a ^° ° nte^ am " °.ir ° ° °^ e summa, easpmeaes wit i �.epasa rm oa ,ms pp ^, ^miff eitn its is ae I l ee ° ^et Boob ,^ s eurere ^I site a of mte, time. Uae r ° o ine,d -v m. ,. e.e ^ae o, e—pld on ° -1w,, rosai ,ne it. or ropey li —Bed —hit -, and sngineers. Raproeaplion of 'he so^trast noaaroe t. m, . o^ o^mne, proiea is ^o, pat -! -. McDONALD NEW FREESTANDING BUILDING MCDONALD'S STATE SITE CODE: 000 -0000 STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specificafl- or red by me under my direct a supervision and that am a duly regfatered ARCHITECT ender the lay,: of the State of MINNESOTA �e - ° Fo a r $ Y ; n �`^ �u DESIGN Y� r, g o Po R.A - rEo ELEVATIONS Signature BRIAN R. JOHNSON 00/00/2011 18050 Date Re Number e EXTERIOR = uegwnN vol{o 4,16,8 _. a {o0 m o HSVM 1HOIl ry osoel uoz o0 00 qo ^ ,+ ► +r'�� T n C NOSN HOf 'b Ntll?19 anVOU815 a n ea ' v a \ ( �I✓ lAJ � � P R w + i A� F„SS n a ;i a +. i i +pa P g o \IY ssa �,o a ; + C , Hill ° �_ VlOS3NNIW '2131VMllI1S °yia"�o;a� oy�o n -d v N 3 ' �w. iwys PAP on w Pi Doan + A a d - r tl1oS3NNIW ;o e ° ;s 0000 -000 3000 311S 31V1S S,OlVN00�W v a ary =vwoa au roacaaa P 5.0 , ey{ ;o smol ey; �epu 10311HOdY y ^ ® m � idov s " =� peas {s{Beu Alnp o 1 MW P-- ° sa�eans ON1011f18 ONIONtl1S33i1d M3N ��i {Y�11. S�17I�U0a�W W w a w jo,uo A. joods uo Aq D44 A p , Agw-q I '1N,y/ jnViSM S'4-IVN04C)W Y.7 P IVool;lgeds' Id s14V loyVA ;1♦✓eg Ageuey I 7n 19t s,nWman IIOZ® 0 1 r Std. 90/50 I.D. sign w/out copy Everbrite mx ftsl+iema_ )OTAGE Wordmark Fascia - LED ' Illuminated Building Arch - LED Boxed square footage 10.75 T 36 91A4 orn 42" 06.68 errt 4 4 . a;. Everbrite Identify systems D"lon Boxed square footage 41.25 27-1/2" 69.8s cm 0 - -- -- — — - � 548.2 cm. 2-3/4' 6.99 Cm Everbrite 1-1, MY LED Direcklonal Sign w/o Arch Everbrile OPO Outdoor Menu Board 20.82" VO Everbrite d—ySo— Everbrite Drive-Thru Twin Pole Canopy w/ Built-in COD 1ft1W__ 3/4" thick channel letters painted black vf/ McDonald's yellow reflective vinyl on faces 1-0 213,36— l2"x48 fluorescent TT light fixture 00 ffd(w Hi - xrm__r I Steel columns A painted ailver 2'-6 6", V painted m tube w/ break feature Whit. ACM (typ) White ACM (typ) APPROACH VIEW PASSING VIEW 3/4" thick channel letters painted black w/ McDonald's yellow reflective vinyl on faces Built-in LCD connnnaflan order display ERE Built-in LCD Confirmation Order Displa N BOXED SQUARE FOOTAGE 40.97 U 44 CA V� A 44 a Z O A Q /-w O W n W u � u 1� T � V 1 Z= z E aj �i x z fr e „ ° � `9 0 U ZO ' h g G" . g Fc- Ag Q Cl n #'- I/1 [i @ 53 z z 1"' EL9 k C 0 W -3.1 55Eb- b88 -�Z$b) 988b -IEb55 VIOG3NNIW 'NOI.ONIW0019 000 19-RUS ONZB 'M 0591 N Y O tI0U17 /IX 83inNON 31YJS N39WIlN'IYNOI.LYN N 52 0 ZS ♦ �. O V W � '09AWMNV lON Q 10- Y'Oild b3N10NV WJ 35n3M -1 SLJ3lYIJ00 1JVDiNOJ 3H1 i0 NOIL0f100?1tr3E 'SiH31i0N3 ONtl p 91091kL0bY 03SN901'I 11ri3d021d d0 53OIAnS 3N1 5321n0321 10TOad 213ilONV NO 31,d M3 2J0 90N321313i1 2101 SONA.v210 953N1 40 95n '9WLL 2H vi v iv 210 3115 1N9213di0 v NO 95n Wll 91omis zN 92Jv 0NV 31tl0 9n5S1 SL "A WUONl1'N00 NI 915 OW-1d6 SM NO 9W 2101 097tld9bd 9219/A S1N9Wn000 v 10V211N00 3H1 'NOLLtlZWWAN N91MIA 1WH1A 03a'10021d921 210 031dOO 99 ION 11VNS ONV Naiv2JOdwO 3 S./11VN00'W d0 /.1213d021d 2N0?Jd dNV 1VI1N30NN00 9FU. 50NIA1Vad 35311 96V 9U1VOW9d5 dNV AAV191 3 ^�. 7r� { n �v �7 �7 i�T 3 •� 1 1 Vsfl JcQ lvNocl �L Iwma 03M31A31 V 133H9 3'11LL 1V ID w 8 8 A 1113 A9 (13AA31A3H 3WVA 133H, 03 SS�144V1'3m ]s O_ mm 1tl11L'IB'K 1110 IIOL IZ 01 U. = 43[1551'O.L02Id �rri NW ?131VM11LL9 A�31A921 X09 1vn 1c1u Wn1clAmi 110Z/V/01 �J tl� .�v U 44 CA V� A 44 a Z O A Q /-w O W n W u � u 1� T � V 1 Z= z E aj �i a Q a ° m 3 ° 0 a st g ;fi ° ���� AL uU Rim r a RR w !I a � $ o a o w 8 8 A O_ mm U. = f LL X f fla • Y - .9 g 9 3 S o00 g z $ o 23 9 E o 61 2UU J o $ o SWOR 0 w -� Oi .1F -1£ 356�8 M`y it o; ;°19 b u m a e .gila a Q a ° m 3 ° 0 a st g ;fi ° ���� AL uU Rim r a RR w !I IT I� � O� u w w w w m v m c� Y w♦ s Shp �P O�N so- �E'�g -<° �goi.' g x ° z, as`s 8� rr a � �a � as &a ddd�d ovod o�000dad..... aaaa ......�,.�a������ 3 gmLL y y guuunouaoaadn�oun ° n l aus KO�ot olddo oio�'twuMffltof vi v�m'v4' '.��ifi9{� 8 i F Is `��>=�EY�•U •E P LLLLCi' 3 2 Y �Ym :.6ytl m E jg6 F}3 A °veP�9 £ IS >mmm ° wLL �` o°o �000 s §w M a�e`e °�•: = y��sa °s "B`= �° � � a� a- as � as - a� k3 ffi� ouu° Sduu�uuGuuuuu °u °u °uuuSmSdoBoo�c ° � ww wwww wwww,;.w�� ww�,2,2u:,�w ,2uuuuu c Gf €�i'3�xa�tf�s`' Tajo poi r� �io� 3 0 �\. ? OOi r� pp ozzii° vi�� 'a 3 �o03Q R���� �S R N A ' ��LLQLLLLLLLL��ww 'x'36° gl 3 ° n �adaa a aaa� amm�a��uaiuuuuuuu�iG� u u u u�ido °�i�`sss ° s €ou:u:u:u:yw��E �,. w�iLL3uciuu�`�i�`zi4`�4x=a��� uue remdaxYl a � $ o a o w 8 8 A IT I� � O� u w w w w m v m c� Y w♦ s Shp �P O�N so- �E'�g -<° �goi.' g x ° z, as`s 8� rr a � �a � as &a ddd�d ovod o�000dad..... aaaa ......�,.�a������ 3 gmLL y y guuunouaoaadn�oun ° n l aus KO�ot olddo oio�'twuMffltof vi v�m'v4' '.��ifi9{� 8 i F Is `��>=�EY�•U •E P LLLLCi' 3 2 Y �Ym :.6ytl m E jg6 F}3 A °veP�9 £ IS >mmm ° wLL �` o°o �000 s §w M a�e`e °�•: = y��sa °s "B`= �° � � a� a- as � as - a� k3 ffi� ouu° Sduu�uuGuuuuu °u °u °uuuSmSdoBoo�c ° � ww wwww wwww,;.w�� ww�,2,2u:,�w ,2uuuuu c Gf €�i'3�xa�tf�s`' Tajo poi r� �io� 3 0 �\. ? OOi r� pp ozzii° vi�� 'a 3 �o03Q R���� �S R N A ' ��LLQLLLLLLLL��ww 'x'36° gl 3 ° n �adaa a aaa� amm�a��uaiuuuuuuu�iG� u u u u�ido °�i�`sss ° s €ou:u:u:u:yw��E �,. w�iLL3uciuu�`�i�`zi4`�4x=a��� uue remdaxYl © LANDRM 2011 s)� co + I I \ 9 t - -- a a9 a� + - - \ ' C� ���° + 1.1 ;- ml •' ^ \\ \ ca \._i \ 4..1^8_,,._ --'" 06 9F T^ w a � + Ic o. d f I Y� r + - 1 v _ — df..LE,Z6oS5N _ 0 \ - 1 \\ - \ 1 4 �+ q " + + co n` \ \ + to cr + I \ �.. CA` - p� ., �a h Q A " �+ r > - �N'� --- _�_ ,o 0 - 9 i mot" o 6 b _ ap Y g o j o n o -$H o��K2 0 °^ro 0 x ao 3m o g O n��im $� 3 8 � • �jo • A 2 y v � � O T � • 0 ���i� `2 E SHEET NO. CITY STATE STILLWATER MN DRAWN BY McDONALD'S USA, LLC. REV DATE REVISION HISTORY o 10/12/2011160% 10/21/2011 REVIEW LITY SUStTTTAL STREET ADDRESS THESE DRAWI CS AW SPECPICATM ARE THE CONFIDENTIAL AW PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MIPONALD5 m o n REVIEWED BY OR REPROPUCEP W $%#U WT BE COPED WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. CORPORATION A THE CONTRACT WC S WERE PREPARED FOR USE ON THIS SPECIFIC SITE IN GONJ WITH ITS ISSUE DATE O -1 Z EMK AT A E - U SE OF THESE DRAWN ARE NOT TASLJ- ON A DEFERENT SAE M LTER M U SE FGA NOT SU E FOR V F �" SHE A EXISTING CONDITIONS ATE REVIEWED 10!202011 REFERENCE OR E %M ON ATJORER T REOU THE SERVICES CF PROPERLY LICENSED ARCHITECTS AND ENGNEERS. REPRODUCTICTI ON OF THE CONTRACT NTRACT DOCUl1ENT ENTS FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECTS NOT AUTHDR¢ED. gg Z NATIONAL NUMBER STATE NUMBER - b - ATETOW ZTPrMA55KI!ff �F.1 I 10/EV2O11 1650 W. 82ND STREET #900 BLOOMINGTON, "NNESOTA 55431 -9888 (952)- 884 -4355 DIANDFQM 2011 \ n + \ \ m + ` ov a \ mu �A \ r ck \ r + o� i i i i C a s• 3 a v O ti y • A X " ' " � ,X` 1 Fn 1 - z > I I i 1 / I � � I Aa ��m yn sono E�n� y� FO� �KZOA Ai� �u D ip m F y£b _g> zn �w AA �,� �i3 m F$.1 y 1T1 �m �. o� ms�� �O y g zv� nm�A HO im,�s> n ay ° g ¢p wo P =gym Wi -- w6 �w w` 8m ro H' 98 >° a c ap g� ma 3 n o — a = =_o vw> n z P oa q5 =2 $ °z m r u V \' p g J c5 STILLWATER M14 1 10/21/2011 Y CNC O. ISSUED McDONALD'S USA LLC. ) THESE GS AND SP NOT De PE TIONS ARE THE O AND P TA2Y PROPERTY OF 1E CONTRACT CORPORATION TION A AWE SHALL NOT BE DOD OR REPRODUCED IT WRITTEN THE N AUTHORIZATION. CON I DOLUNENTS WERE PREPARED FOR USE RE TNS SPEITE E N M CONJUNCTION WITH ITS ISSUE DATE AND RE A NOT SUITA&.E FOR USE ON A DEFERENT SITE I R R A SITE AT A LATER TINE. USE OF THESE S D RAW IN GS FOR C AR REFERE NCE R MVIE ON ANOTHE PRO.ECT REQUIRES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED NOT AUTHO AND ENGINEERS. RE RE PRODUCTION OF THE OMRACT DOCUMENTS FOR REUSE ON ANOLHER PRO.ECT 6 NOT AUTHOR6ED. O . (� O ..j Z Y �j UA'CE 10/2/2011 REVISION HISTORY 60Y. REVIEW REVIEWED BY EMK DATE REVIEW ED ���) CITY 5U5 TTAL z v DEMOLITION - NATIONAL NUMBER STATE NUMBER A 1Ol2VEOR A 1650 W. 82ND STREET X900 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -9888 (952)- 884 -4355 ®IANOFOFW 2011 ©LANDFall 2011 0 1 w + i I I \ o� \ 4 - \ V A 0 F i i i e l , � � °—i ° �N � >< 3Ii L gsnc�iZpy r hi 4 " D� o =m=o = = _ x m� s i 3 ° 9F ° " o° m nz b£o° HS' �anam< �Dm �n `� ?o <x °s o� g m nA m SAO b4 p �� gy = o ' 0 3 = 0 • m � 444 44 lz ?m nz I m< SHEEI NO. CI TY TILLWATER MN DRA ISSUED McDONALD'S USA, LLC. o REV IO /R/ 011 60% REVIEW REVISION HISTORY f� STREET ADDRESS C THESE ORAMNCS All) WECWAT04 ARE THE COWDENDAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MIPONALdS (/zJ Z' '? 10/21/2011 CITY SUBMITTAL m ` + CORPORATION AND SHALL NOT BE COPED OR REPROOULED WTNOUi WRMTEN AUIHORRATION. THE CONTRACT �] O o REVIEWED BY _1 (� W DOCUMENTS WERE PREPARED FOR USE ON IRS SPECIFIC SITE IN CONMCTION WITH MS ISSUE DATE AND 0 19 SIEEI NA61E EMK ARE NOT SUTABLE FOR USE ON A DEFERENT SITE OR AT A LATER Trt1E. USE OF THESE DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OR EXAfPI.E ON NNOIFER PROJECT REOURES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY IMENSEO ARCHITECTS AND E R GRADING. DRAINAGE PAVING DA NGNEER5. RODUC ION OF THE CONTRACT DOCLTENT5 FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT 5 NOT AU HORREO. & EROSION CONTROL �� ' gg NATIONAL NUMBER 91ATE NUMBER A C Z >� 3 10/2MMI 1650 W. 82140 STREET #qOO BLOOMINGTON. "NNESOTA 55431 -9888 (952)- 884 -4355 45' PIAMETER R -1642 DRAINAGE AGO UTILITY EASEMENT—,—, I \ 0 ------------ \ \ \ o \ P o� \o / ' \ \ v- \ 15"P, \ \.\' I. PPE MATERIALS WATERI'IAIN FIRE DIP CLASS 52 DOMESTIC 2' COPPER, TYPE K IRRIGATION 2" COPPER, TYPE K SANITARY SEWER PVC SCHEDULE 40 STORM SEWER PVC SCHEOULE 40 RCP CLASS 5 TIZ GREASE TRAP SERVICE PVC SCHEDULE 40 2. CONTACT UTLTY SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FELD LOCATION OF SERVICES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNNC, 3. COORDNATE WITH PRIVATE UTILITIES TO PROVIDE ELECTRIC, NATURAL CAS, AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO BUILDNC. 4. PROVIDE MEANS AND MEASURES TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE DURING UTILITY INSTALLATION. 5. PPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR END OF END SECTION. 6. ADJUST STRUCTURES TO FINAL GRADE WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH REOUREMENTS OF UTDTY. MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOAONC N PAVED AREAS. 7. I1 TRACER WIRE WITH UTILITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY OR EASEMENTS. B. CONTACT CRY OF STILLWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTION OF ALL UTILITY WORK AND STANDARDS. 9, CONTACT CITY OF STILLWATER FOR WET TAP INSPECTION. 10. MAINTAIN 7.5 FEET OF COVER ON WATER. 11. DEFLECT WATER TO MANTAIN 15-NCH MINIMUM OUTSIDE SEPARATION AT SEWER CRO55NC5. CENTER RPE LENGTHS TO PROVIDE GREATEST SEPARATION BETWEEN JOINTS. 12. CONTACT CRY OF STILLWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEM FOR FLUSHING AND PRESSURE TEST INSPECTIONS. 13. PROVIDE 4 -NCH RICO FOAM NSULATNIN ON SANITARY SEWER LESS THAN 7 FEET DEEP. 14 BRING WATER AND SEWER SERVICES INTO BUILNG PER MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. JOIN AMID ROUTE BUILDING STORM DRAMS AM CONNECT TO STORM SEWER MANHOLE. 15. CONNECT i0 DOWNSPOUT WITH TRANSITION TO 5-INCH PVC AND ROUTE TO STORM SEWER. ® IRRIGATION SLEEVE TO M 4' SCHEDULE BO PVC IN DRIVE AISLES BURIED 24" BELOW GRADE. SLEEVES TO BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. EXTEND SLEEVES 3' BEYOND THE EDCE OF PAVEMENT. (COORDINATE WITH IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR.) 17 THE PRMARY ELECTRIC FEED, TRANSFORMER, AND METER ARE PROVIDED AND NSTALLEO BY XCEL ENERGY. THE TRANSFORMER PAD DESIGN 15 PROVIDED BY THE UTLTY AND CPIJSNUGTION B BY THE CONTRACTOR. CONTACT UTILITY FOR PAP DETAIL. THE SECONDARY ELECTRIC AND CONDUITS SHALL M INSTALLED BY THE ELECTRICAL COMRACTOR. CO ® SITE�UCMNC i ROV E 3�4 CONNDUITF OR PROVIDE AL ARKINC CONDUITS LOT Y FOR AIDI 1/2' PVC CONDUIT FOR ROAD SICK SEE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. ® XCEL ENERCY WILL FURNISH AND INSTALL CAS SERVICE PIPING FROM THE MANNNE TO THE METER AND THE METER. CAS SERVICE FROM THE METER SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE MECHANI CAL CONTRACTOR. 20 COORDINATE WMH MECHANICAL AMID ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATIONS OF SERVICE CONECTION5 AND CONTINUATION OF SERVICES WNMIN BUIIDNC. 21 COORDINATE TELEPHONE WITH CENTURY LINK TO PROVIDE TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 4' PVC COMPLY WITH PULL STRING, SWEEPNC BENDS ONLY (NO 90 DEGREE BENDS), FROM PROPERTY LIE TO THE BULDINC. PROVIDE CONDUITS FOR CABLE TELEVISION AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION. 22. PROVIDE CONDUITS FOR CABLE TELEVISION AND OTHER ELECTRCAC COM UMICATION. 23 REFER TO PLLMW PLANS FOR EXTERIOR CREASE INTERCEPTOR DETAIL. IT 15 ASSUMED THE TANK AMP TOP SLAB ARE PESICNED TO HANDLE ALL LOADNCS INCLUONC TRAFFIC AND SOIL THAT MY LEAD TO STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE. THE TANK MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING AND MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AMID STATE CODES. 24 PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKING. REFER TO SHEET C7.3, DETAIL #1. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL 8E CASTICHT OR WATER TOM. APPROVED RESLENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CON TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE SLIDING OR WATER 96RVCE LINE MUST BE TESTED N ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. 27. CEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO CONFIRM THAT EXCAVATION AT BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION AREA DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY M., CL, OR OL TYPE SOILS. I. STORM SEWER BOTTOM - 910.68 SANTARY SEWER TOP = 905.47 CLEARANCE = 2.21 FT. 2. STORM SEWER BOTTOM = 910.58 WATERMAN TOP � 905.37 CLEARANCE - 2.21 FT. / c C7S SAN I 75 ECT TO CONNECT TO E%13TING / ,yL SAN LINE AT NJV= W/ RISER CO / / / Know what's Below. CAIN rotor• you dig. 0 L A N- 7) F O R M NORTH From Site to Finish ® III M 6N 105 South FM Avenue Tel: 812 - 252.9070 0 2� 4() Suite 513 F= 812- 252 -9077 Mlnneepolis, MN 55401 Web: IandFoTm.net F N Z O H 3 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ��aZ p� S � WSW N KyyUyyX+�< � w N1 Ha v 3 2 I '. E N F. C4.1 FOW 20,T 0 i 69 x c L m� 1 �I a ..0 O g� m Am H V m v N 's Z n c gi ;q gs Al E -e , , Al vv 2 It u �?�' '. §� e g - • ------ d a8 e � tll IN !I i p 9 � k; T x£v b o aKm s, 0 °1 zo m b 22 W C°1 Z m ° w & A 0 i 69 x c L m� 1 �I a ..0 O g� m Am H V m v N 's Z n c gi ;q gs Al E -e , , Al vv 2 It u �?�' '. §� e g - • ------ d a8 e � tll IN !I i p 9 � k; T z �a z s° v C) a m c n m x n m Z m v W C z c CO3 M G) m i e x£v b aKm s, 2 C°1 0 m ° 1H 4' -o N m pA�m v P G C, 0000 m -5 1 O m 40� Wel G ' =� N m A££ rn b �- wow r �< �• 6' p $ ° Z 0 ro- z v ;� r c fo Z 0000 N v ➢� O��I g zD n T T •o y 3A m A G) O N z G) 0 p [ =m { m z �a z s° v C) a m c n m x n m Z m v W C z c CO3 M G) m i e x£v b aKm s, 2 Oi m ° 1H D 000 pA�m v P G C, 0000 -5 1 m 40� Wel m m A££ p b �- n m r �< �• 6' 1 a z �a z s° v C) a m c n m x n m Z m v W C z c CO3 M G) m i e ° saon _ �T 1 x£v romiz aKm s, 2 Oi m ° 1H D 000 D v P ° saon _ �T 1 > z � oz� m _ \ m � �R it — III u� III — I � M .z z D �m x m O m` r T n AAA � m ° � n� = — 111 =1I T z m 08 m Aim G H A m a I' r F qJ / -1 , N , ;'; C d r ;R LA 0 0o y o � -• a m m� o —III m m r r m . 0 3£s s a 0 0 yam 0 0 $ m smur NO. C(TY STATE DRAWN BY REV DA'Z'E REVISION HISTORY snuwATER MN �D McDONALD'S USA, LLC. g g � 10/12/2011 EOX REVEW a 2 1/2011 m STREET ADDRESS THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TFE CONHDENR ND AL A PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MAONALD 10 /2 L1TY SLBMTTAL 'S 7.11 7. A } n to CORPORATION APO SHALL NOT Be COPED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. THE CONTRACT € Q R K V < s REVIEWEDBY a; ae. n DOCUMEMS WERE PREPARED FOR USE ON TNS SPECIFIC SITE N CONJUNCTION WITH ITS ISSUE DATE AND '� c Y q b S Y EMIC ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON A DEFERENT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. USE OF THESE DRAWNG5 FOR m Q" .T, d �' S Z S �i DA REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTFER PROJECT MURES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED ARCHITECTS Q CIVIL CONSTRUCnON DETAILS 10/ 1 AND ENGINEERS. RL9RODUCTON OF THE CONTRACT DOCUI'tENTS FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT B NOT AUTHORRED. g gg NATIONAL NUMBER STATE NUMBER A Q �a aqa �Z5 H1f2U7DU 1650 W. 82ND STREET #900 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -9888 (952)- 884 -4355 i� ➢� 2� m ^� s x£v Oi p 000 v go 3 0000 -5 1 m J. 0000 raw ° r n m r �< � 00000 a F£ gz 00000 00000 - r Z 0000 m y 3A A G) CO) N p [ =m m V •v m N m - m F 0� > z � oz� m _ \ m � �R it — III u� III — I � M .z z D �m x m O m` r T n AAA � m ° � n� = — 111 =1I T z m 08 m Aim G H A m a I' r F qJ / -1 , N , ;'; C d r ;R LA 0 0o y o � -• a m m� o —III m m r r m . 0 3£s s a 0 0 yam 0 0 $ m smur NO. C(TY STATE DRAWN BY REV DA'Z'E REVISION HISTORY snuwATER MN �D McDONALD'S USA, LLC. g g � 10/12/2011 EOX REVEW a 2 1/2011 m STREET ADDRESS THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE TFE CONHDENR ND AL A PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MAONALD 10 /2 L1TY SLBMTTAL 'S 7.11 7. A } n to CORPORATION APO SHALL NOT Be COPED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. THE CONTRACT € Q R K V < s REVIEWEDBY a; ae. n DOCUMEMS WERE PREPARED FOR USE ON TNS SPECIFIC SITE N CONJUNCTION WITH ITS ISSUE DATE AND '� c Y q b S Y EMIC ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR USE ON A DEFERENT SITE OR AT A LATER TIME. USE OF THESE DRAWNG5 FOR m Q" .T, d �' S Z S �i DA REFERENCE OR EXAMPLE ON ANOTFER PROJECT MURES THE SERVICES OF PROPERLY LICENSED ARCHITECTS Q CIVIL CONSTRUCnON DETAILS 10/ 1 AND ENGINEERS. RL9RODUCTON OF THE CONTRACT DOCUI'tENTS FOR REUSE ON ANOTHER PROJECT B NOT AUTHORRED. g gg NATIONAL NUMBER STATE NUMBER A Q �a aqa �Z5 H1f2U7DU 1650 W. 82ND STREET #900 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 -9888 (952)- 884 -4355 i� ➢� 2� m ^� s >: SSEb 499 - (ZSb) 9996 - 1£655 V1O5-3NNIW 'NOlONIW00"19 OOb# I3I MS ONZ9 'M 0591 110M AX M O smilclay3ollio tl H39WHN 31YJS N331I N1VNIDUYN € y a s w F - ' o3nnoHlrro lON s Laroze z3Hlol+r No 9sn9z aoa sw9l.nnOOa I--- 3H1 dO Na- d9z 'sa99naa9 onv 110=01 SIMM NOLL7(IXLSNm7lW� f 4 ' t c V S1O31YObV 095N3O11 kJM40?Jd dO Sa Md3S 9H1 S921ND97 JaTOM b39mNV NO 31d a W - "N3a3�f3?1 43�31A3713.LV4 'I V _ (% O js§ 5 ° W4 SONAVW as3 d0 3Sf1 '9WI1 b91v1 V lV w 9LS 1NaM d V NO 3SN WO 919VIM Im 9bv )1V43 V . h F 1' (1551 L MIA NOLLOWW'NOO NI 915 Oal -IdS SNi 9 NO 3N TdvMd 9b9m F- et ONV 91VO 3 'mY S WJ b SiN9W1000 A9 O3M31A3H ivz [� lOVn1NOO 9H1 'NOLLVA?IOHllIV N31Lnm NOH11m O3OfI00Md3n b0 03NOO 98 lON 'IlVF15 a✓tl NOLLV210d7J0O V (( z (/I SAIVNOOIW d0 A1b9d03d AbV191 Wad aW 1VLLN90WO 9 9 V SN IVLXAO3dS WV S0NMV7d 99aU ss3uaav 133HJS 1v11YJ9'15 A11O 1102 12 01 Z m3n9z X09 11az /z1 /O1 �- „s e o c O ' _ P V C (1 S �TOCION 0 NW NaLvmllLLS AHOJSIH NOISIAaH 3J.Y0 A3H �u' 5 � 'a ��.+71 1 �..7 �.1 1�L l' R AO NMYHO Al2 I 'ON J.33H z y o � °= I M yow III I =11 p — w .9> ° ov zm 'zLLa�<� a I - 111 11 = III 111 =III III= g Rfffl, ii i $ I I I I I I I I I I III; °m J ° ° to � O. mn a N � ° 3 � ° s �a'3aa�af v gw € �3' ° 999 Q V III III- II IIIILLIIIIII I a�x� °� ° s I III I III_II III IrII -III I I � �F � � w g Z �z e�� I s a O g g �� I A ABE �a III =1 1 -Alit m 9 I I a. W H B/I F bb �u �g 4 m� 11711 o mo r i ll°s� <" °w m "d z� g w So °wwo d ��yLLm g= d IIIIII__I IFS III I�Ilj- mud ° &�� °$ �1 �� I IIIIIII�� mw � so° �� W 3 s<ga .Zr XVW 1 Ad � °9s 9 z 0 oV b f/J F U 919VIYVA � � n o z X11 NNW g WV3?115 NMOO y ?JO 1110 -Nr91O m w M ! - m 1 111 z9noO WLMN s'c i g i -womb B: J D i V N m ➢ m S19 a� g a °g P ' g lllTl� -_ Q d° I I , Z O 1�111�� p = 1- W rlll � 11 1L J 11 > z I z 0 0 z ° m m_ �,s– D- — _ I III i n° c U III 1' 1 =1 I, I' 1 - 1 III — I - 11 ' 0 =11 =1 — I1 =1 - 11 = 1 1= a II —A g a I II— III -1 11 = 1 I I— III —I 11 3 I 11= III ° Iil� 1 1111 1 a a ° v gw ui Q V G 2%°ry �� m LU E� �s 4 w g Z �z e�� I s a O g g �� o� g A x �a a .Zr XVW 1 Ad � °9s 9 z 0 oV b f/J F U 919VIYVA � � n o z X11 NNW g WV3?115 NMOO y ?JO 1110 -Nr91O m w M ! - m 1 111 z9noO WLMN s'c i g i -womb B: J D i V N m ➢ m S19 a� g a °g P ' g lllTl� -_ Q d° I I , Z O 1�111�� p = 1- W rlll � 11 1L J 11 > z I z 0 0 z ° m m_ �,s– D- — _ I III i n° c U III 1' 1 =1 I, I' 1 - 1 III — I - 11 ' 0 =11 =1 — I1 =1 - 11 = 1 1= a II —A g a I II— III -1 11 = 1 I I— III —I 11 3 I 11= III ° Iil� 1 1111 1 a a ° gw ui G 2%°ry �� m x Z E� d g Z �z e�� I s a a3 g g �� o� g A x �a a a. W bb cc O H d � E� d g H� d � x� 5 SSEt 499 — (Z5b) 999b V10S3NNU 'NOOMWOON 000 13 -FJ15 ONZ9 'M 0591 II07✓171IX e ,y, V O Y 836W(IN 31YJS N39WNN lYNO11YN s x r F < a9azoHlm loN a 1�3•oad z9ruoNV No 9sran zod s1N94nwo 1�vnwo� 3u do Nal�reozd3z sa33rxa�3 arvv IIOZ/IZ/IX SIIYJ30 NOUMUSNOO IWO °'f`9p ° O V o 5103111�?ly 635N3OYI A'Ib dea i0 59OInb95 3H1 S3LIlI iNgZ D3110Nd NO 9'Id4 M 3ON3?Hd3?1 03M3 3LV M Z '➢pp �6 �' .� g bOd 91 6 - XI 3° it M 35f1 '311LL D31 1 1 - G S 1N NO r,1 Y NO 9 zod 3 IM S lON O" y V - 3HS I= 8g PY F' ONY 31 YO 30551 S11 H11M NGLLONVWOO NI 315 OFk03dS SILL NO 9S0 ?103 43?1Yd3)Jd 3i13M S1N34YI000 O V lO"INOO 3H1 'NOLLYAWHINY N91.01A 1NoH1m OdNIO maa 210 031d0O 35 ioN 'AVMs cNV NOUVWdwo W A8 (IaMalAA11 / 1 z U 541YN W d0 A14UOU "VIM602U VV 1VLLN9dHW9 aU 371v SNOIIVONO3d5 dW Snta d 35311 V 'Itll %9 IIOZ IZ 01 [� 8'� y z z S53UOOV lMws n3n9a xoe Iloz/zl /ol � �� 1 1 c V Jl l JcQ� Y l�LO�.I` �L a � a NW 2131YMllLLS ALOJSIH NOISIA3II 7.1.V0 An u _ V o 9 NMVNO 31V.LS "Ja 7 a� Z o s� 3 �N rk I I m - =lll Ill 4 Ire Q@ 1 1 1_ ; l il `"� OG ty w VIII III —I jk �...— — Ill ill < h -j s3zvn z off 9 o .�z Q < s1z9nN and Nv�d 93s M. II =II W O < Z Fri 1 :III III= 311 1F �I F �I III= - I I- I F u` N m aR 0 m� g aft Q W F z y I Q I Q I Q 2 = m� V c UA fjl V 2 O y � � As o ` H ui v 3< k' I� W 0 3� �t �o �s o 1111 a g ��� 4 HE vti I I III III III III -11 0000 O o 140E IItl1PlUM M. ALOJSIH HOISIM Y of � 4 1 5504- b99475b) 999b -10455 N10S3NNIW 'N0I0NW00"19 OOb# 133?115 ONZO 'M 0591 IIOUIUOI z S3IwAoj.%w V "133HS _O y v o � Iw7alua �+ F" LU '0392YN110V ION 9 1031'02N 113N10Ntl NO 3 X SIfNLY1J00 1OV111N0� 3LL 40 Ng1Df 311 'SJ33 d11V a3M31A3N3 Z � 3a d0 u ziaV 3N1 53WID 103f0?Jd 113110NV NO 31 a J m I f ON331i3b V 51031N011tl 035N30-3 11 1'R agn 3W Y5 3MV 1YY1 P91J0 3 d0 35l1 'LL 1131"1 2Y1 315 31Hdi0 V NO 350 1YH 59 MV V 1V 35 O WI 1A: AS (13M3 Z z d 95a 1J0� SN O3d00 V SA'IVNOU'W 1M3d011d 1?1V1312Id0?Jd Q1V 'IVLLN3@J 311 3Dtl g1tlOId103V SONIMVIJO 35311 W d0 A A a&JO ONV WH S d5 ON 0 o ° 'Dil `vsn sIa 'IVNOGZ) � u O r 'o V O 4 Oi Qr�m °04 �x N ws o zama �s ua O I Iwa <Z u>= U a � I LL � u z g4 y5 O 1 N NW co z 0 w 6 p 9 J - a 3 V IrF a I Y Z !7i 1 5504- b99475b) 999b -10455 N10S3NNIW 'N0I0NW00"19 OOb# 133?115 ONZO 'M 0591 IIOUIUOI z S3IwAoj.%w V "133HS _O Iw7alua �+ F" LU '0392YN110V ION 9 1031'02N 113N10Ntl NO 3 X SIfNLY1J00 1OV111N0� 3LL 40 Ng1Df 311 'SJ33 d11V a3M31A3N3 V �' �.7 3a d0 u ziaV 3N1 53WID 103f0?Jd 113110NV NO 31 a J m I f ON331i3b V 51031N011tl 035N30-3 11 1'R agn 3W Y5 3MV 1YY1 P91J0 3 d0 35l1 'LL 1131"1 2Y1 315 31Hdi0 V NO 350 1YH 59 MV V 1V 35 S S1N AM/A S1 igW 1 f1 *N 511 WH M N 1 IIM Ni 315 09DW NO 3511 0 0 LON bd ' S a4 N3WN O 9 1� V111N0� 11M O?JNO� d3?1 110 1 YIVN Q NO N iagdMlld WI 1A: AS (13M3 Z z d 95a 1J0� SN O3d00 V SA'IVNOU'W 1M3d011d 1?1V1312Id0?Jd Q1V 'IVLLN3@J 311 3Dtl g1tlOId103V SONIMVIJO 35311 W d0 A A a&JO ONV WH S d5 ON ° 'Dil `vsn sIa 'IVNOGZ) � u O 1 N NW co z 0 w 6 p 9 J - a 3 V IrF a I Y Z !7i ° v 0 0 N Z 0 v ° S SW p � m � M i 1m &' 1 M31MN'IVNOIlVN S3IwAoj.%w V "133HS LU SS3UOOV Ki3vis Naym ° v 0 0 N Z 0 v ° S SW p � m � M i 1m &' ANDPOW 2011 \ \ \ � \ \ E �t � E �`- �� m § 711 ; ■ E . k� �v I � I I I I � \r§ § §! §;;*;« ® § - ;) ;! |! 4 ;rte /«�■`m� = ;� \! \ 4 ( !! #I!■r |; \ )`§§ § 2 f!1 _ ® ( / ww s M� ` § m maw McDONAL� S USA LLC. G © � sntEEr ADDRESS COUNTY TRUR # / 10 m _ _ _ a\ � �\ SHEET NAME � /BEN WERE \ /S� � \�� ) �P�PE �N _ _� REPRODUCTION ,_ _ � FOR _.,__ _=,r _,_ � \ _»_ " ms m_e 5 _1 » erg w 7O »� m; _ »a 55431-q8813 (q52)-684-43!55 x. - - _HiR�IH P 1 A OF Y Nt<t 1. Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: November 2, 2011 CASE NO.: 2011 -57 Holiday Station Stores Design Review of proposed signage for Holiday Fuel Station 1835 Market Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C - Commercial ZONING: BP -C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE: REVIEWED BY: PREPARED BY: DISCUSSION November 7, 2011 Community Dev. Director Michel Pogge, City Planner gA JI- Cub Foods recently sold all of the Cub Food branded Fuel Stations company wide. The fuel station here in Stillwater was sold to Holiday Station Stores. Holiday is looking to rebrand the site from Cub Fuel Express to the Holiday brand. Currently each long face of the canopy has two signs. One is a "Cub Fuel Express" sign. It measures 20.36 feet by 3.0 feet, for a total area of 61.1 square feet. Its background color matches the color band on the grocery store. The second is an LED gas price sign. It measures 6.66 feet by 3.0 feet, for a total area of 20 square feet. The new Holidays signs would include a "Holiday" name and logo. Individual channel letters will be used with the colors red, white, and blue. The letters will be internally lit with LED lighting. The sign is 16' 10 wide by 2'3" tall for a total of 54.9 square feet in area. New replacement LED price signs will be added. The outer edge of the sign will be blue with Unleaded letters in white and red LED pricing numbers. The LED price sign is 6'5" wide by 3'6" tall for a total of 22.5 square feet in size. 4 i 1835 Market Drive Page 2 For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's retail space has 127 feet facing Market Drive. The total sign area of the proposed signs is 77.4 square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/ photo of the proposed sign • 1% Case No: JD"' �o /f 5 7 Date Filed: _ Receipt No.: Fee; $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10 -day appeal period. Once the 10 -day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIRCATION Address of Project 1861 A MFT S7 Assessor's Parcel No. Zoning District Description of Project in detail n / ")OP'g liisr >lu� �J /C�itJtzCii ,� }2�7y1�t Qi�5 /lU�J� /NS tl�LL v2 SzTS o F /WlC,�: S1liuS - 9` AV 4'4 -7U "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, inforrrration and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my kno wiedge and belief, to he true acrd correct. I further certify I wAl comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is M - / u fined Property Owner � ���� � ;� C��� Representative Z - M - t Uu '9AJ& Poz..)''sr) Mailing Address �(� �)`•� � ?S � Mailing Address (o o y a k' iuro /a uE /-' City State Zip City State Zip Telephone No. rya g lD Telephone No. (o5f -L► , ©- Zia S:�Plaiinfny�dcslgn review permlt.wpd /yrrll U, 2002 Fee* $50M COMMUnity Development Department 216 North Fovrth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 + Attach ea are the fol.lowing docurnents (Required to be submitted with application) KI Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterictrof the building. 1 Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park re wire desi n review by HP C' A .'s W N Sign Size: Djmensions. Square Feet sign Height (If freestand N) 3" x Setback% From PMP,erly Line I Fern Bldg Prom Driveway/parmking 10 Colors Mamrials. Illuminatiom P,yes m No If Yes, Type: Declaration I hereby certify that the Information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request, is available at Stillwater City Hall, Remerriber to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service, S \PlarininglFortns' xpfir, for Sign Pennit,dor Updated: September 23, D)06 Adores" 'RY State Zip ZE M R Name Phane# 07, Address CRY State A4 T] � Name 1 Phone 4 �23�,51e� City State Zip Attach ea are the fol.lowing docurnents (Required to be submitted with application) KI Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterictrof the building. 1 Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park re wire desi n review by HP C' A .'s W N Sign Size: Djmensions. Square Feet sign Height (If freestand N) 3" x Setback% From PMP,erly Line I Fern Bldg Prom Driveway/parmking 10 Colors Mamrials. Illuminatiom P,yes m No If Yes, Type: Declaration I hereby certify that the Information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request, is available at Stillwater City Hall, Remerriber to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service, S \PlarininglFortns' xpfir, for Sign Pennit,dor Updated: September 23, D)06 F NI 4 Pay Booth f 12 C I 11 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --------- - - - - - OL i 1 1 1 1 �1l 1 1 l Canopy 1 10 i 35 hotos # 13-32 1 ye p eE of Gar F'urctps r 9 ---- - - - - -- 38 - - -' 44 £tl Stillwater Store Surveyor blame / Per Phone Qli43.9 11 Site Number Holiday Story- 1801 Mar et S rep Survey Date ¥12 ;2311 .. St h ata" _, 'At I] = I Customer: DA[e: Prepared By ! 5:etc: Color om rm'a ea heexrn whu. he a d dus d-i ..Ul Mors—d. FMS m she doun CMYIS DISTR IBUTED BY SIGN U P COMPANY HOLIDAY STATION STORES 10/10/11 eM g inf . I� �I�r ti an r e a aPMSmu huduc uonmE dawagwl6emude. oozes s eecsou�w�c Location: File Name: En F EflSH�� PO Boa 210 STILLWATER, MN # 706 109040 - 3X6 1 -PROD LED SF g S/BBMAKERS / /MAGENVILBERS 1(800) 843 9 888 - -olio 1 (800) 843 -9888 • www.personasigns.com Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Monday, November 07, 2011 Re: 2012 HPC Meeting Schedule Message: The following are the 2012 meeting dates for the HPC: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 Monday, February 6, 2012 Monday, March 5, 2012 Monday, April 2, 2012 Monday, May 7, 2012 Monday, June 4, 2012 Monday, July 2, 2012 Monday, August 6, 2012 Wednesday, September 5, 2012 Monday, October 1, 2012 Monday, November 5, 2012 Monday, December 3, 2012 From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430 -8822 • Fax: 651.430 -8810 • email: mpogge @ci.stillwater.mn.us