Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-05-02 HPC PacketA workshop meeting will begin at 6 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN demolition process. The regular meeting will begin at 7 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, May 2, 2011 p.m., Monday, May 2, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 55082. The purpose of the workshop will be to review and discuss the City's p.m., Monday, May 2, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 55082. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF March 7, 2011 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/2011-16. A demolition request of a residence located at 502 5th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Jennifer Cates, Cates Fine Homes, representing KC Kidder, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/2011-08. Design review for signage on an existing pole located at 14130 60th Street North, Advanced Dermatology Care, in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Northern Sign Solutions, applicant. Continued from the March 7, 2011 and April 4, 2011 meeting. 5.02 Case No. DR/2011-14. Design review for exterior painting and signage located at 226 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Steve Chinander, applicant. 5.03 Case No. DR/2011-15. Design review of signage located at 124 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Joan Sleem, applicant. 5.04 Case No. DR/2011-17. Design review of exterior modifications and signage located at 1150 Stillwater Blvd, in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Brian Larson, representing St. Croix Sensory, applicant. 5.05 Case No. DR/2011-18. Design review of store front renovation located at 229 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Mike Hoefler, HAF Group, applicant. 5.06 Case No. DR/2011-19. Design review of construction of a new infill building located at 229 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Mike Hoefler, HAF Group, applicant. 5.07 Case No. DR/2011-20. Design review of signage for a projecting sign located at 208 Main Street South, Stillwater Olive Oil Co., in the CBD, Central Business District. Holly Arps, applicant. 5.08 Case No. DR/2011-21. Design review of signage for Stillwater Liquor located 1950 Market Drive in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Chad Wichmann, applicant. 5.09 Case No. DR/2011-22. Design review of signage for Stillwater Brewing Company located at 402 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Justin Stanley, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.01 Request for extension to demolition Case No. 2009-30. Richard Van Horne, 223 Pine Street West. 6.02 Discussion on pedestrian walkway and bathroom design. 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Selection of 18th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards 8. ADJOURN To: Heritage Preservation Commission Fr: S Wiegand Date: April 28, 2011 Re: April HPC Minutes The April 4, 2011 HPC minutes are not available at this time. They will be emailed to you if they are received before the May 2, 2011 meeting. warer THE BIRTHPLACEOFMPNNESOTA Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planners ty�. Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011 Re: Worksession: Prep for City Council meeting Message: Attached is the memo that will go to the City Council for the Joint Council/HPC meeting in June. In addition to the attached material, I expect to provide a little background to the Council on the previous commission retreats and worksessions that lead the Commission to this point. As requested, I have also drafted changes to the demolition ordinance that will also be reviewed with the Council. Dave Magnuson has completed an initial review of the proposal and did not find any major issues with the proposal; however, he is still reviewing it so it is subject to change. Related to the NCD Guidelines chances to address additions and remodels, it is not reasonable to completed edits for discussion with the Council in June. As noted in the material, I am suggesting that the HPC works on it this summer and presents a proposal to the Council in the fall. On Monday, I would like to review this material with the Commission and would expect that we would make final markups on the material at that time. Thanks, Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Why have an HPC? Preservation of our rich historic culture has been a long held value of the City. When the HPC was establishing in 1996, the declared public policy for the Commission was the "preservation, protection, perpetuation and use of area, places, building, structures and other objects having a special historical, community or aesthetic interest or value is a public necessity". Preserving our past gives our residents a sense of community and our visitors a tie to our past. However, the role of the HPC is much more than just playing the role of "aesthetic police". Preservation provides value. Nearly every study completed has shown that historic preservation protects property values and often -historic properties will appreciate in value more than similar properties in non -historic areas. In all parts of the country this trend holds. A Texas study showed that property values of historic properties increased in value a range between 5 to 20 percent over non - historic properties. Historic districts also attract private investment. A national example of this is Lowertown in downtown St. Paul, is one great example. Once a declining warehouse district the area is now one of the hottest real estate markets in the region. Yet Lowertown has some of the strongest preservation regulation in the City of St. Paul. Historic preservation provides more economic benefits to a community than just protecting property values. Many communities have come to understand that it is an economic development driver. Historic preservation improves quality -of -life, attracts business, provides incubator space for startups, and supports historic tourism. All of these can be seen in our City today! For too long the City has taken preservation for granted. Viewed by many communities in Minnesota as a leader in historic preservation, many outsiders are shocked to find out how little the City does to protect our resources. While we are currently a leader in the density of historic resources, without protection this title will not hold forever. Even our own residents are shocked to find out when they call to ask about the City's "historic district" for residential remodels and additions to find out they are free to do nearly anything they wish. To that end, the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission believes the City needs to take steps to protect our resources before they are lost forever and has identified the following issues and makes recommendations on how to address each of them. Demolition Review Current Situation: Currently before a structure over 50 years of age is demolished, a public hearing si required before the Heritage Preservation Commission unless the structure is an immediate life safety hazard. Applicants are required to complete what is known as the "nine steps" before the commission will approve a permit. Once the nine steps are completed the HPC is required to approve the demolition permit unless the structure proposed to be demolished is on the National Register of Historic Places (currently 8 residential structures and 64 commercial building in the downtown area are on the NRHP) or are local designated (currently no structure in the City is locally designated). Problem: Due to the rather relaxed requirements of the current ordinance, important structures could be demolished and the current demolition ordinance would not protect the property. For example, homes like the Alexander and Ida Nelson house on top of Chestnut St Stair; the John and Anna O'Brien house, now home to Rivertown Inn; and Adolphus and Aurora Hospes House now home to Aurora Staples Bed and Breakfast all fall outside of any protection that the City's demolition review ordinance provides. On the other hand, currently all structures over 50 years of age that are proposed to be demolished require a public hearing before the Commission. Even those that clearly have no historic integrity. A change should be made to allow staff to initially review demolition requests so that staff could approve the demolition of buildings that do not have historic value or integrity. For example, a 1950's block garage on a property with an 1800's home would be a chase where staff could approve the permit. Finally, the ordinance fails to define clearly, what a partial demolition is. Possible Solutions: Staff has researched demolition ordinances from 37 HPC's around the State of Minnesota. Two ordinances of note that the City could look to are from Chaska and Minneapolis. 1. In the case of Minneapolis, staff conducts an initial review to determine if a structure is potentially historic and if not, staff administratively approves the demolition request. This would expedite clear-cut cases and allow them to be quickly approved. Other cases when principal structures and historic outbuildings are proposed to be demolished they would generally continue to be reviewed by the HPC. 2. Both Chaska and Minneapolis have a provision that allows the Commission to impose a 180-day waiting period. This approach of requiring a waiting period is also very common throughout the nation when it comes to demolition reviews and allows the community time to search for an alternative to demolition. The Minneapolis ordinance take it one step further and allows the Minneapolis HPC the opportunity to consider locally designating the property during the waiting period and if approved by the HPC and City Council the demolition of the property could be blocked. Where rarely applied, it provides a relief valve of sorts, which also requires City Council approval to ensure that properties are not locally designated without just cause. The Heritage Preservation Commission suggests that the City take immediate steps to implement a demolition review ordinance that protects more than just eight residential properties in Stillwater. Attached is a draft completed by City Staff, that the HPC supports and requests that the Council begin the process to adopt. Design Review Current Situation: Currently the City has four sets of design review guidelines 1) Downtown, 2) Neighborhood Conservation Design (NCD) Guidelines, 3) West Business District, and 4) Liberty Village Commercial Area. While there are design guidelines in place for most Commercial properties in the Community, the same is not true for residential properties. The current NCD Guidelines only apply to infill projects on vacant properties and offers no control over existing properties. Problem: Homes can be completely renovated without any review affecting the integrity of neighborhood and ultimately the property values surrounding the renovated home. Possible Solutions: First, it needs to be clear that not all renovations need to be subject to review. Paint colors, roof material, and minor changes should not be subject to review by anyone. In the interest of time, minor renovations should only be subject to a staff review with only major renovations or changes that are not in the spirit of the guideline should be subject to HPC review. Many of the provisions included in the NCD Guidelines could be applied to both infill homes and proposed renovations. Some changes would need to be made to fully address renovations versus new infill construction. With the Council's approval, the HPC will begin a review of the NCD Guidelines and would plan to present an updated set of NCD Guidelines for the City's consideration in the late summer/early fall time frame. Preservation Districts Current Situation: Since 1995 the City of Stillwater has received grant funds from the National Park Service to conduct 10 neighborhood architectural studies that encompass approximately 1900 properties over 700 acres of land. This is typically the first step to the establishment of locally designated historic districts. To date, the City has not established a single locally designated historic district. Most other historic communities in the State of Minnesota have done this. Problem: The HPC is in a position to complete the work with funding support from the National Park Service and the City of Stillwater. Due to the City's budget situation starting in 2009, the City cut required matching funds to obtain funding from the National Park Service. With our in -kind contributions for these type of projects, the City can expect to receive $2.00 for every $1.00 of City Match. These funds are needed to hire a consultant that has the expertise necessary to complete the project. Possible Solutions: The City Council should consider providing funding in the amount of $7,000 to $10,000 per year over the next 3 to 4 years in order to provide the required grant match to complete a local designation district. Property Maintenance Code Current Situation: There is no systematic way to address properties that are in declining within the City. Problem: With our older housing stock, maintenance is important to protect the City's historic housing stock. Possible Solutions: The City Council could consider implementing a property maintenance code to address the condition of housing in the City. However, since this type of program typically involves enforcement actions, hiring City employees would be required to conduct these types of inspections rather than contracting to private companies. However, due to the current budget conditions this is impracticable to institute this type of program at this time. The Council should make it a goal to start this type of program when practicable. Rental Housing Inspections Current Situation: The City of Stillwater currently does not complete rental -housing inspections. Problem: Concern has been expressed in the community regarding the condition of some properties in the community. There is a community perception that rental properties are the culprit and that they are not adequately monitored by the City. In 2009, the US Census Bureau estimated that there were 1,562 rental units within the City of Stillwater representing 23.1% of the housing units (2010 actual counts are not yet available for owner vs. rental units). While many absentee landowners are proactive and take care of problems, others simply fail or refuse. Without an inspection program, the City has no way to identify or have issues corrected. Additionally, without a program it is difficult to track down owners when there is a problem that needs to be addressed. Possible Solutions: The City should consider creating a rental -housing program. Knowing that City budget is tight, it will be hard for the City to take a program on and add new staff to complete inspections and support it. One approach some communities have taken is to have private, city approved, Housing Evaluators complete the inspections. Rental housing owners would select and pay the Housing Evaluator directly for the inspection. The rental housing owner would then file an application, a copy of their inspection report (typically required to be completed once every 2 to 4 years), and annual fee (typically around $25.00 per year) to the City. The annual fee would cover a half time secretary who would coordinate the program. This would also benefit the police and fire departments who would then have a list and contact information for all of the rental housing owners within the City. Time of Purchase Inspections Current Situation: There is no systematic way to address properties that are in decline within the City and it is unlikely that the City will develop a property maintenance code to address any of these concerns. Problem: With our older housing stock, maintenance is important to protect the City's historic housing stock. Possible Solutions: The City should consider creating a time of purchase inspection program. A program such as this is intended to enhance the supply of safe housing and to prevent the deterioration of the overall housing in the City. Similar to the retail housing inspection, the owner could hire a private city approved Housing Evaluator to complete the inspection. Any hazardous condition would be required to be corrected before the home is sold helping to preserve the community's housing stock. State of Housing in Stillwater The current economic condition has placed strains on housing throughout the nation and Stillwater is not insulated from it. Recovery has been difficult and is slow. Housing Vacancy Rate One factor influencing the state of housing is the vacant housing rate. Between 2000 and 2010 the percentage of occupied housing units in Stillwater has decreased from 97.8% to 93.4%. While this change is concerning, the vacancy rate does not solely stem from foreclosures and distressed properties. One needs to be careful when interpreting housing data since seasonal houses are prevalent in April when the Census is taken. Many are used only during the summer and tourist season. This number is likely to grow as retirees live elsewhere during the winter. Still this trend is concerning and needs to be monitored. Housing Unit Changes between 2000 and 2010 2000 2010 Stillwater US Percentage Stillwater US Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Total housing units 5,926 7,576 Occupied housing units 5,797 97.8% 91.0% 7,075 93.4% 88.6% Vacant housing units 129 2.2% 9.0% 501 6.6% 11.4% Source: US Census Data from the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors The Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors provides a number of key indicators about the Stillwater housing market as a whole. Attached are graphs that represent the Median Sales Price, Number of New Listings, and Months Supply of Homes for Sale in the City of Stillwater form the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. This information includes traditional sales, short sales, and bank owned sales. Data from this source is available between January of 2005 and February 2011. Staff would like to acknowledge the assistance of local real-estate agent Cheryl Larson who helped identify this source of information and reviewed various MLS listings with City Staff. Median Sales Price The median sales price represents all completed sales in a given month. The median sales price peaked in the City of Stillwater in September 2007 at $299,900 and fell to a low in December of 2009 $209,500. Since December of 2009, the median sales price in Stillwater has gone up to $230,000 as of February 2011. This remains below the January 2005 median sales price of $259,494. New Listings New listings is a count of the properties that have been newly listed on the market in a given month. The number of new listings peaked in Stillwater in December of 2006 at 857 and has steadily been on the decline to February 2010 number of 618 which is the lowest it has been in the available data range of January of 2005 to February 2011. Months Supply Months Supply compares the number of active listings available to the average monthly pending sales for the last 12 months. The supply of housing peaked in April of 2009 at a supply of 12.4 months. As of February of 2011 it has fallen to 9.8 months; however, this is still high compared to 5.6 months seen in January of 2005. What does this mean? While the benchmarks are showing signs of improvement for Stillwater, we are not out of the woods by any means and still face difficulty in the housing market. If the months supply continues to decreases the real- estate markets will stabilize. It is too early to declare that the worst is over for Stillwater; however, we are certainly witnessing some stabilization if not improvements in the Stillwater real-estate market. It is also important to note that these trends do not necessarily hold true throughout the MSP metro area or even in the St Croix Valley. For example, Bayport just witnessed their lowest Median Sales Price in February 2011 at $167,930 from a high in March of 2007 of $282,500. Due to this, it would not take much for the market to return to a downward path in Stillwater. State of Historic Housing Stillwater's historic housing stock has typically represented some of the community's most affordable housing. As the market has lowered the values of housing throughout the Community, this has placed additional stress on our historic core by providing added competition. Additionally, the number of condominium/townhome units available in the western area has added even more competition. Until the market stabilizes the Historic Housing stock will be stressed and face challenges. The market has also made redevelopment of our entry-level historic housing units prime targets for teardowns and redevelopment. As older homes are demolished and replaced with newer homes many times they are dramatically out -of -scale with a different style of structure that will affect the historic character of our existing neighborhoods forever. This trend in turn pushes other homes surrounding it towards a similar fate. Once these historic structures are lost they are lost forever and the historic Stillwater charm that everyone loves to point to will slowly erode until it is lost. Chapter 34 BUILDING DEMOLITION Sec. 34-1. Purpose of chapter. This chapter is adopted for the purpose of protecting the historic and aesthetic qualities of the city by preserving, rehabilitating or restoring, when reasonable, buildings or structures which constitute or reflect distinctive features of the architectural or historical resources of the city, thereby promoting the public welfare and preserving the cultural heritage of the city. Sec. 34-2. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subdivision, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Buildings or structures of potential historic significance means a building or structure or portion of a building or structure 50 years of age or older. Commission means the heritage preservation commission. Community Development Director means the Stillwater Community Development Director or his or her designee. Demolition means one of the following: (1) Razing a building. (2) Removal of fifty (50) percent or more of the structure. (3) Removal of more than twenty (20) percent of the exterior front facade of a structure. (4) Removal of more than forty (40) percent of the total exterior side and rear facades of a structure. (5) Removal of any part of a roof for the purpose of expanding the living space. (6) Demolition by neglect. A demolition shall not mean any of the following: (1) A structure required to be demolished in accordance with Minn. Stats. ch. 463. (2) Destruction by fire that has been determined to be a total loss by the Community Development Director. However, a fire that is caused by arson and was proven to be started by an act of the owner or the owner's agent shall be considered a demolition. (3) Destruction by a natural disaster or other similar event and which has been determined to be a total loss by the Community Development Director. Historic Resource means any building or structure that is not currently designated as a Heritage Preservation Site which but is worthy of such designation because of its historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological or engineering significance for one of the following reasons: (1) The property is associated with significant events or with periods that exemplify broad patterns of cultural, political, economic or social history. (2) The property is associated with the lives of significant persons or groups. (3) The property contains or is associated with distinctive elements of city or neighborhood identity. (4) The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural or engineering type or style, or method of construction. (5) The property exemplifies a landscape design or development pattern distinguished by innovation, rarity, uniqueness or quality of design or detail. 16) The property exemplifies works of master builders, engineers, designers, artists, craftsmen or architects. (7) The property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Historically significant building or structure means any building or structure or portion of a building or structure on the National Historic Register, a designated local landmark heritage preservation site or a contributing structure or building in a designated national register historic district. Nonhistoric structure or building means a structure or building less than 50 years old or a noncontributing structure in a nationally or locally designated historic district. Sec. 34-3. Permit required. No building or structure may be demolished without obtaining a demolition permit. An application for a demolition permit must be filed with the city building official. Sec. 34-4. Procedure. The building official must forward a copy of each demolition permit application to the community development director, Subd 1. The community development director shall first review the permit for determination of historic significance or potential significance. The community development director must make one of the following determinations and take the associated action: Subd. 1. (1) The building or structure is historically significant or potentially historically significant (a) If buildings or structures is historically significant then the application must be sent to the commission for review according to section 34-6. (2) The building is potentially historically significant since it is 50 years of age or older. (a) If a building is potentially historically significant since it is 50 years of age or older the community development director needs to follow the procedures in section 34-5. Subd. 2. (3) The building or structure is not historically or potentially nonhistoric. (a) Buildings or structures determined to be nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit. if buildings or structures arc deter fined by the comity development director to bc historic or potentially historic, the application a +st be scRt te.-ie commissienn#erneview according to section 34 5. Buildings er stpuct+*res-Eletcr i+}ed r iste-ic m++st bc referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit. Sec. 34-5. Review of potentially historically significant buildings or structures. The community development director shall review all demolition permit applications that are for buildings or structures over 50 years of age or older to determine if a building or structure is a historic resource. If the community development director determines that the property is not an historic resource, the permit must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit. If the community development director determines that the property is a historic resource, the building permit shall not be issued and the application must be sent to the commission for review according to section 34-6. Sec. 34-5.6. Demolition plan review. Demolition plan review shall be conducted as follows: Subd. 1. Not less than 30 days after the community development director determines that a building or structure is historically significant, the applicant for the permit must submit to the commission 15 copies of a demolition plan which must include the following information: (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; (3) Photographs of all building elevations; (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; and (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. Subd. 2. The commission must hold a public hearing according to chapter 31-204, subdivision 3 2 of this Code on the pending application. Depending on the type of application before the commission the commission shall consider the following: (1) Historically significant building or structure After the public hearing and a review of the application information, if a finding is made that there is a feasible alternative to demolition, the permit must be denied. I After the public h aring and -a -review of the application information and if the commission determines that the owner has made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure and after finding that there is no available feasible alternative to demolition, the commission must notify the building official in writing that a demolition permit may be issued- as provided subdivision 3 below. If a finding is made that the building or struct we is historically s+g t a..d t-IeKe is a feasible alternative to demolition, the permit must be denied. (2) Potentially historically significant building or structure After the public hearing and a review of the application information, if the commission determines that the property is not a historic resource; the commission must notify the building official in writing that a demolition permit may be issued. If the commission determines that the property is an historic resource and that there is a feasible alternative to demolition, the commission shall deny the demolition permit and direct the community development director to prepare or cause to be prepared a designation study of the property, as provided in section 22-7, subdivision 4, or notify the building official in writing that a demolition permit may be issued as provided subdivision 3 below. Subd. 3. In notifying the building official in writing that a demolition permit may be issued, the commission shall take one or more of the following steps: (1) Destruction of historic resource. Before approving the demolition of a property determined to be an historic resource, the commission shall make findings that the demolition is necessary to correct an unsafe or dangerous condition on the property, or that there are no reasonable alternatives to the demolition. In determining whether reasonable alternatives exist, the commission shall consider, but not be limited to, the significance of the property, the integrity of the property and the economic value or usefulness of the existing structure, including its current use, costs of renovation and feasible alternative uses. The commission may delay a final decision for up to one hundred eighty (180) days to allow parties interested in preserving the historic resource a reasonable opportunity to act to protect it. (2) Mitigation plan. The commission may require a mitigation plan as a condition of any approval for demolition of an historic resource. Such plan may include the documentation of the property by measured drawings, photographic recording, historical research or other means appropriate to the significance of the property. Such plan also may include the salvage and preservation of specified building materials, architectural details, ornaments, fixtures and similar items for use in restoration elsewhere. (3) Demolition delay. The commission may stay the release of the building, wrecking or demolition permit for up to one hundred eighty (180) days as a condition of approval for a demolition of an historic resource if the resource has been found to contribute to a potential historic district to allow parties interested in preserving the historic resource a reasonable opportunity to act to protect it. The release of the permit may be allowed for emergency exception as required in section 34-6. Sec. 34-6. Emergency demolition. If a historically significant or other significant building or structure poses an immediate threat to health or safety due to its deteriorated condition, the owner of the building or structure may request issuance of an emergency demolition permit. If both the community development director and building official find that the condition of the building or structure poses a serious and imminent threat to public health and safety and that there is no reasonable alternative to the immediate demolition, the community development director and building official may issue an emergency demolition permit. Sec. 34-7. Injunction. In addition to any other relief provided by this chapter, the city attorney may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for an injunction to prohibit the continuation of any violation of this chapter. This application for relief may include seeking a temporary restraining order, temporary injunction and permanent injunction. Sec. 34-8. Violation of chapter. Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and a separate offense shall be deemed committed on each day during on which a violation occurs or continues. Current City of Stillwater Demolition Permit Process Demolition Permit is received Is yearstructure over Yes—► 50 years of age? //7— % Issue Demolition Permit Is structure a life 7 safety hazard? Yes No 7 Issue Demolition Permit No N 1 Make application to HPC. HPC hold public hearing and review application. Has the applicant // Is it historically 4Yes— made a reasonable Yes�, Is Application Complete j significant? effort to sell or / preserve the „7 7 structured 1 Yes 1 Is there an alternative to�`� demolition? Yes Deny N No • Deny and stops here or table and applicant resubmits. Proposed City of Stillwater Demolition Permit Process Demolition Permit is received HPC Deny and CDD starts process to prepare a designation study of the property Is structure over NN 50 years of age? %— Yes--► No Issue Demolition Permit Is structure a life safety hazard? Yes No Make application to Is structure Historically Yes—� HPC. HPC hold significant? public hearing and I review application. j No CDD review to determine if structure is a historic resource. Yes Does COD determine structure is a historic resource? Does the HPC find Is there an alternative historic t-Yes to demolition? Yes—, that the structure is a resource historic resource? Request to prepare designation. study is sent to CC. Does the CC approve? Yes Designation study is completed within 120 days. N No No )r Issue Demolition Permit Is Designation study r---�► approved by HPC and CC? Yes► permit is taken. Final action to deny No Is it historically significant or a historic resource? historically significant Is there an alternative to demolition? Yes Deny 4Yes—< J Has the applicant made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the r structure?r' N Yes--K Is Application Complete No Deny and stops here 1 or table and applicant resubmits. 1 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 27, 2011 PROPERTY OWNER: KC Kidder APPLICANT: Jennifer Cates Peterson REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a single family home LOCATION: 502 5th St N HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planne CASE NO.: 11-16 BACKGROUND KC Kidder, property owner of 502 5th St N, is requesting a demolition permit for the existing single family home on the property. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District. In the future, any new structure would require a NCD design review permit. The current structure was built in 1929 according to the Washington County Assessor's office. The intent of the property owner is to build a new single family home on the property. Subject House 502 5th St N Demolition Permit Page 2 SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting consideration of a demolition permit for the single family home on the site. EVALUATION Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review. Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... This structure was built in 1880 according to the Washington County Assessor's office making it more than 50 years old, which makes it potentially historically significant and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission before it can be demolished. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items that must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; This information is included in the attached application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; This information is included in the attached application. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The entire structure is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant included information from Cates Fine Homes that it would cost at least $90,000 to make the home livable and add a "band aid" to the exterior of the home. They go on to note that this does not address fixing the failing foundation nor the head room issues on the second floor. 502 5th St N Demolition Permit Page 3 (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant stated in their application the following: "re -build a new home to code and in keeping with the historic style of Stillwater and neighborhood style of the home." (7) No plans for this new home were submitted thus the application is incomplete. However, since this property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and if the home is totally demolish it would be subject to a public hearing and review by the HPC prior to the issuance of a building permit. Therefore, staff is comfortable that the Commission could approve the demolition permit subject to approval of the neighborhood conservation design district permit. Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Low/Medium Density Residential and is zoned RB, two-family residential. The proposed use as a single- family home conforms with the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements. This site is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District. Any new structure in the future would be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant includes a number of alternatives to demolition; however, they generally note that none of the alternatives are feasible nor conforms with the historic character of the area. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant notes that Realtor Tracy Bagliio has attempted to sell it; however, has not been successful up to this point. No other form of advertisement was noted in the application. The applicant has included some history on the house in their application. 502 5th St N Demolition Permit Page 4 Demolition Findings Section 34-5 Subd 2 outlines the criteria for approval or denial of a demolition permit. There are two criteria the Commission must consider in either approving or denying a permit. 1. Is the building or structure historically significant? The code defines historically significant as "any building or structure or portion of a building or structure on the National Historic Register, a designated local landmark or a contributing structure or building in a designated national register historic district." This building is not a historically significant building per City Code requirements. 2. The owner has made a reasonable effort to sell or preserve the structure and there is no alternative to demolition. Reviewing the application material, staff finds that the owner has completed eight of the nine required steps. Related to providing "Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located", no plans for a new home were submitted thus the application is incomplete. However, since this property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and if the home if totally demolish, it would be subject to a public hearing and review by the HPC prior to the issuance of a building permit. Therefore, staff is comfortable that the Commission could approve the demolition permit subject to approval of the neighborhood conservation design district permit. Staff would recommend approval of the demolition permit subject to approval of a neighborhood conservation design permit. As such if the Commission agrees with the above finding, then the Commission must notify the building officinal in writing that the permit may be issued subject to the conditions listed in the approval. 502 5th St N Demolition Permit Page 5 ALTERNATIVES The HPC has several alternatives related to this request: A. Approve. If the proposed demolition request is found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. a. The demolition permit shall only be issued after the HPC has issued a design review permit for the new home. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the demolition rules then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your June 6th meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is June 14, 2011. RECOMMENDATION Approve the demolition as conditioned. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Demolition n Commission Permit Receipt No Address of Project: Sn a 5S f A/ Parcel No.: 0 3 0 a 0073 Lot / 4) Block Subdivision C ei if C7' <? Applicant: lie 19 ✓l i l ('a t_P cP--e__ lS1U �t Address: 200 0 )rl Ct t,),S fr / c I Al lid Telephone No.: (5t7 !/uJ at L v ,17p-, Owner if different than Applicant: ('_ / d eP Y_ f Address: /3 33 Af c—' a e- N Telephone No. (pS! ` (/ 3 Type of Structure:__ Age of Structure: ndition of e: ,Of) 6 r ..21 7 g Intended Use of Site after DemolitiS /' S19 r f 9tPLILA• C_A4 re of APPlial_nt /10(dAr Signature of Owner Date Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 1 y appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal 1iod has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department The tie for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project Date 2000 Industrial Blvd. STILLWATER, MN 55082 T: 651.439.2844 To: HPC From: Jennifer Cates Peterson Date: April 11, 2001 RE: Demolition Permit Application F: 651.430.2922 CATESFINEHOMES.COM MN LIC# 20533260 Application items: a. Map showing the location of the building: see attached b. Legal description: SABIN'S ADD TO THE CITY OF STILLWATER Lot 16 Block 5 SubdivisionCd 11080 Owner of record: KC Kidder c. Photos of building elevation: see attached d. Description of structure: The home was built in 1929, it is wood framed with a limestone foundation that is or has major deterioration. The construction style could be called "cottage". Its style is somewhat non-descript. e The reason for proposed demolition: The structure is in poor condition and the rehab work would not make sense from an economic stand point. In addition you'd still be left with a less than desired looking house (design and structure). The minimum cost to repair the exterior of the home is $20,000.00, using products such as vinyl siding and vinyl windows. This would be in our opinion a "band aid" and the house would continue to be an "eye sore" in the neighborhood. The interior remodel to attempt to make livable is a minimum of $70,000.00. This cost estimate still leaves the "second floor" or dormer off the north side roof unusable (dormer was built using the existing 2 x 4 floor joist from original house). This cost estimate also does not address the poor condition of the foundation, technically the house should be raised and a new foundation installed. f Proposed plans and schedule for the reuse: re -build a new home to code and in keeping with the historic styles of Stillwater and neighborhood style of the home. g. Relation of demolition and future site use: The home is currently located in a residential neighborhood and we are proposing to build a residential single family home, 3 bedrooms, 2 bath. h. Alternatives to the demolition: Repair present home. This in our opinion is a "band aid" option. The cost to repair the home is substantial, the home was never quality built or added on to. The non - historic element is the addition & include the front porch constructed at a different/conflicting pitch then the original part of the home. i Evidence of sale: Tracy Bagliio has attempted to contact various contractors in the area to sell. With the current state of economy that is not feasible for many builders. The best approach that we came up with is to demo the home and build a new one (small, quality built at a reasonable price that will attract a family to move into the neighborhood/Stillwater) versus spend a minimum of $100,000.00 just to get it livable to then rent out. Some history: The home was built in 1929. Larry Kraft was the owner of the home from 1974 to 2008. He was the owner and operator of the Kinsel's Liquor Store, in downtown Stillwater. KC Kidder obtained the home in 2008 in need of fixing up. Her intentions were to remodel/fix up the home and then sell it. Due to the "great" Recession, implementing those plans made it very difficult. Historically speaking the home has had additions applied to the house that is not in keeping with the original "cottage" type home. The front porch seems to be added out of scale with the home - the pitch of the two roofs doesn't match and look odd. The front dormer on the right side of the home is not historic and another addition that is not in fitting with the original home. 0.7 -,.. mit utOtt• 4 vAg. Google Maps 4/11/11 8:32 PM maps http://maps.google.com/?q=502%205TH%20V%20 020 TILLWATER 20MN%2055cli 082 1G� 0 0 Page 1 of 4 •/0' SCALE 1" = 20 FEET B LO 5TH STREET N. LOT C K 15 Address: 502 5th St N Existing House to be Removed LOT TOP OF BLUFF 5 16 0 SCALE 1" = 20 FEET B LO 1. 5TH STREET N. LOT C K 25 15 30 � � I LOT TOP OF BLUFF 5 16 25 Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City PlannerR Date: Thursday, April 28, 2011 Re: Case 2011-08 Advanced Dermatology Care Sign Message: The applicant has asked that their sign be tabled to the June 6t1, HPC meeting to allow them additional time to redesign their sign. They have verbally indicated that they will extend the review deadline. If we receive that in writing prior to the HPC meeting, staff would recommend that the HPC table the item to your June 6t1, meeting. If we don't receive an extension, staff would recommend that the Commission deny the current permit without prejudice which would allow the applicant to reapply without the one year waiting period. Staff will update the Commission on what direction to take at the meeting on May 2nd. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4Lh' Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 27, 2011 APPLICANT: Steve Chinander CASE NO.: 11-14 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed wall sign and building colors for Love From Minnesota LOCATION: 226 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner-4 DISCUSSION Wall Sign The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 226 Main St S for Love from Minnesota. Love from Minnesota is a retail store specializing in all things from Minnesota. The wood sign is proposed to contain the words "Love From Minnesota" in white letters outlined in black on a white background. The logo is yellow, orange, purple and green. The sign will have a brown and green border. The sign is 7'10" wide by 2'8" tall for a total of 20.8 square feet in area. The sign will be non - illuminated. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 22 feet long facing Main St S. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 20.8square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 226 Main St S Page 2 Colors The applicant is proposing to paint all non -masonry building surfaces on the first floor blue with white accents. Color samples and photos noting which areas will be painted which colors are included in the packet. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 5. % o ki-S' Assessor's Parcel No. t 2 , 43f, 2...0, I ` o '5i Zoning Districts V $3 Lf Description of Project in detail A-61a i 1 5729 r /4 t fr eXtit `0 r ,t•U Li, fe o.V4 )9)0 °L-- Y`S tGCI I L- v rre 1ek, MV t a t J later ��avt �.r i� �i sr kfig ,1�` 5 b/ d "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner 1g1k- s x Mailing Address 13•i) QA City State Zip g1/4*---‘ MI4 6E12-51 Telephone No. 625 I '7 City State Zip Telephone No. Representative g-te Ue- Mailing Address 2,05 Frei ry re_cv nt,e- ht J2®se v,)) e,, / rl ;5t3 I 4.91-,3c7-1 q13 c)t P®/ S:\Planning\design review permitwpd April 12, 2002 April 7, 2011 To Whom It May Concern: From: Love From Minnesota, Inc. Steve Chinander Re: Letter of Intent — 226 South Main Street Love From Minnesota's intent is to paint the exterior which presently is a gold/yellow to a blue/white as per our submittal pictures and color sample. The brick will remain the same. The proposed sign is also included and located. The sign will be mounted on the building above the entrance. The entrance is centered on the building. Please review, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Steve Chinander Love From Minnesota Vice President -Owner 2465 Fairview Avenue North * Roseville, Minnesota * 651-639-1413 * Fax 651-639-1425 G26 8690W Snow Ballet Clear Sky 8024M Capri Grotto 1 SttI1wi er Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address ti ;2,2-� 5 rnoti vz. 5-hex-T.Stillwater City State MN Zip 55082 Applicant ya r a di:- from- M ii K irteS t. -- S�'eve,1114 144y Pho # � g1-4v3,7=l 74)71v 9 23 e_y-16 Zip j 13 Address y� 1 .� �� TI f/'1/leLcJ ��DS�9J1 City /} r ,) Owner (if different from Applicant) Neil l /gv1nj O )0/i'1, .S l/0 Pbne fa7/F".1115Ad71 S n �„ / / V /j/ Zip 6-67 ,7 r ` 7 eci �� �j Gi \� / �y/�q CiUI./ 4 b Contractor's Name Name i3 v F tN\ /'� O1 II Q L ���u� �1�� Phong#'i ' 7 l ;'CI ,i 6 3� .d� � 1"r f i'k(l ;(��%lUe CityS ,�0 S� 1/ / ��� ,trw ! ►t 1li Zi�5/)3 p l Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: o7/ 1 x z1� u Bldg = SqI A. 7..+ Sign Hgigh>tt( !!�� �� vita Setbacks: From r operty LineFrom ri way/Parking of Colors:B ro wh p iq,k i A I `- i rc (( Y' Materials:pie _j �L Illumination: ❑ Yes .No If Yes, Type: Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is is - d related to this request. Review (For office use only) ❑ Approved 0 Denied Date By Permit # Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 26, 2011 APPLICANT: Joan Sleem CASE NO.: 11-15 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Camy Couture LOCATION: 124 Main St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION Wall Sign The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 124 Main St N for Camy Couture. The sign is proposed to contain the words "Camy Couture" in black letters on a pink background. The sign is 12.45 feet wide by 1 foot tall for a total of 12.45 square feet in area. The sign will be non -illuminated. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 16 feet long facing Main St N. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 12.45 square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 124 Main St N Page 2 Projecting Sign The applicant is also requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign. The proposed sign face is 1 foot 2 inches tall by 4 feet for a total of 4.6 square feet. The sign is proposed to contain the words "Boutique". The lettering is proposed to be black on a pink background. The sign bracket design is included in the packet. Since the name of the business is not on the sign, this is permitted as an additional sign. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not counted towards the total area. The total sign of the sign face is 4.6 square feet, which meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk. 4. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building Case No: r Date Nled: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 4 i-is- r, ,1 ✓Dla. DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of aft forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project lj/ Assessor's Parcel No. Zoning District Descrpton of Project in detail Provide one (1) double faced aluminum blade sign with 1/4"Sin "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in al/ respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I evil comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signatures required. Property Owner Joy/! e /2 Representative deiw Mang Address ./.3/ ,1.Ws /114 ,L1 Mailing Address i'SV �1144d✓ LS'Z .cJ City State Zip 5h '/l" '- City State Zip ,.¢ ,lade, nap SSJ.?g' Telephone No. s/ - r72'- d5-4'r Telephone No. /06 ! - !Oa- ai40 Application for Skin Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Locati of 5 n Address 7'S/ O1 /%7/9/» .i City ; Stillwater State MN ZIP/ 55082 Applicant Narn7...., 1 ,5%El r� PhoneZi.3")- g9d•.2/4 3 Address /d?.�`.,/ , 44z1 f,2 'L City �A %i/!li/St-�! S AS �PJj/v7 Owner fif differeuyt frorrr A p earn Name Ji / & /J?iI,0-,N Phone Z,..57, 777 -As-la Address 4, �`i. /,'1 I C1` j f/Wa- iti-c%' -5�3/ i`'Gum L S ,, Zip .5.5g .3, Contractor's Name Name Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. (Randy Burns) Ph' 651-429-6100 Address2025 Gateway Cr. Suite 2 city Centerville State MN zIP 55038 Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) X Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used, If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. X Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. . Sign Details Sign Size: t3imens4ons: 1.0 x 12.458 = Square Feet 12.458 Sign Height (If freestanding) SeFrom Property line From Bldg Fa rs onvewayiParkinst l of Colors; Pale Pink & Black Aluminum tliurtrina�t on: ❑ Yes X No i= Ye5, Type - Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Owner Signature (required) Date Applicant Signature Review (For office use only) Approved n Denied Date By Permit # Conditions for approval: Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license applica is available at Stillwater City Hall. n Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S3Planning%Forms1Applicabon for Sign Perrnit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 CORPORATE0SIGN, INC. 5766 E. Perdido Dr. Ph: 480-488-9369 Cave Creek, AZ 85331 Fax 480-595-2588 email deq@corpsign ,,can r- CD RI = DESIGN REVIEW APP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No; Date Fled: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 TION FORM The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. AN supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required bulding permits. An following information is requk ed PROPERTY 1DENTTFICATION Address of Project Assessor's Parcel No. Zoning District Description of Project in detail Provide one (1) 2" deep aluminum panel mounted at ends with 9ti dips and 1I2" thick black Sintra letters mounted flush to panel "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner JieI1'L. Representative cJoA.� Mailing Address 40'5/31 /1 Ir)€ /J Oty State Zip ,.57i / mot-cr r 5 s vfl. Telephone No. f 5i %179' -‘2.1Ce i Mading Address 43s -s/ i/aLr� i€' City State Zip 1j/9« rn� s3-ia s Telephone No. aier 3 S:1PlannlnrAdeuyin review perrmawpd April 12. 2E#Q2 Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Stgn Address %43h1 ,f'/ l /19Ai/1 j z City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Appllcant Na ja#� j1 ev2-? Phone fl9a Address is -/ Yoe/ �tii,e,tl City e/.¢ State yh.e-i Zip .5S 7d2lr Aavner rf c tl rerrt from,4 icaf tj Name J4 /iliL 7 Phone* 6.5 - State 777,2 777-r1s-% Zip 5 5 & yGG Address -3/ `i',I3 Ai/ Al m City 3 bW/4?/t1"�/' Contractor's Name Name Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. (Randy Bums) Ptmne # 651-429-6100 Address2025 Gateway Cr. Suite 2 city Centerville State MN z4' 55038 ttached are th following documents (Required to be submi application) X Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign_ Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HP Sign E3etails Sign Size: Dimensions: 1.166 4 X Square Feet 4.b64 Sign Height (If freestanding) Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg From Driveway/Parking Lot c° Pale Pink & Black Ma1erials Aluminum Illumination- o Yes X No ` If Yes. Type- Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Ouster Signature (required) Applicant Signature Review (For office use only) o Approved 0 ?eni+ Date Permit* Conditions for approv • Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility fixations. This is a FREE service. S: PlanninglFormstApptication for Sign Permit:doc Updated; September 23, 2006 4_ 71/111.1/17 fiwanj. CORPORATE SICN, 5766 E. Perdido Dr. Ph: 480-4/38-9389 Cave Creek, AZ 85331 Fax: 480-595-2588 rnm !' � q THE B[ RTHPLACE OF Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 27, 2011 CASE NO.: 11-17 APPLICANT: Charles and Donna McGinley REQUEST: Design Review for exterior building changes, and signage for St. Croix Sensory, Inc. LOCATION: 1150 Stillwater Blvd COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C -Commercial ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner/All BACKGROUND Charles and Donna McGinley are proposing exterior changes and new signage to the Former Jennings State Bank at 1150 Stillwater Blvd for St. Croix Sensory, Inc. The building has been vacant since the Fall of 2009 when Jennings State Bank closed. The work requiring a design review permit entails enclosing the drive thru, adding three new parking spaces next to enclosed drive thru and new signage on the existing brick pylon sign. 1150 Stillwater Blvd Page2 of 3 EVALUATION OF REQUEST The property is located within the West Stillwater Business Park. Consequently, the design standards found in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan apply to the project. Enclosing the drive thru The current roof and columns that make up the drive thru are proposed to remain in place with new footing and walls used to enclosed the face. On the exterior, the lower coarse of brick and precast trim will wrap around the new addition. Above the brick and trim cement fiber siding similar that what exists on the peak of the roof is proposed to be use. The cement fiber board will be painted to match the exiting painted surfaces. In front of the newly enclosed drive thru the applicant is proposing to place three new parking spaces bring the total number of spaces to 39. Signage The applicant is proposing to repurpose the existing pylon sign for their use. The existing bank and electronic sign will be removed and no longer used on the site. A new precast cap will be installed on top of the remaining brick wall that will match the existing precast used on the sign. The exiting address on the sign will remain. The sign is proposed to contain the words "St. Croix Sensory" in white metal or resin letters mounted on the brick surface. The logos will white made of metal or resin and mounted on the brick surface. The sign is 6 feet wide by 2 feet tall for a total of 12 square feet in area. The sign will be non -illuminated. For retail freestanding signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a freestanding sign, 'the gross surface area of a sign may not exceed one hundred square feet'. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 12 square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 1150 Stillwater Blvd Page 3 of 3 ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the Design Review Permit with the following conditions: a. All changes to the approved plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director. Any major changes will also need to go to the Planning Commission and/ or Heritage Preservation Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits. b. All utilities and ground or roof top mounted mechanical equipment must be screened from public view. c. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. must match the color of the adjacent surface. 2. Deny the design review permit as requested. If the Heritage Preservation Commission decides to deny the requests, findings of fact substantiating the findings must be provided. 3. Table the requests for additional information. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the request with the conditions identified in above. Attachments: Location map Applicant's materials cc: Brian Larson Charles and Donna McGinley DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: DI L/ --17 Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $Z5.00 ��-ov J 13 '7(o The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 1150 Stillwater BlXessor's Parcel No. 32.030.20. 32.0068 3P C (Required) Zoning District Description of Project in detail Enclosing eitting drive- thru stucture to be finished in same materials. Removal of e ectrtnic signage cemponentoand placing and logo to existing brick column. "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required PropertyOwnerchard:es Donna McGinlevRepresentative Brian Larson, AIA Mailing Addressl 3701 -30th St Cr N Mailing Address 807 N. Fourth St City State Zip Stillwater, MN 55082 City State Zip Stillwater, MN 55082 Telephone No. 651 -331-9733 Telephone No. 651-430-0056 Signature �(��r/i • fV( � Signature (Required) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 St. Croix Sensory, Inc. CIS 14 April 2011 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Design Review Application for 1150 Stillwater Boulevard Members of the Commission: This letter is regarding 1150 Stillwater Boulevard N., also known as the former Jennings State Bank Building. Charles and Donna McGinley (Stonecutters, LLC) have a purchase agreement to purchase this building from American Bank. The building will be occupied by St. Croix Sensory, Inc., a family business that the McGinley's have operated for over 30 years. The building will continue to be a Business Group B Occupancy, and upon closing in June, the owners will undertake remodeling work. The interior of the building will have minor renovations, including reconfiguration of some office and work spaces. The only changes to the exterior will be to enclose the existing drive -through space. Three walls will be erected to enclose the space without any change to the existing columns or roof structure. The new 1045 sf addition will be used for shipping and handling. Three new windows and one new door will be placed on the walls of this enclosure. There will be no other changes to the existing building. Existing Building The current structure at 1150 Stillwater Blvd. was built in 2005 for Jennings State Bank. The building has been unoccupied since 2009. The proposed changes to the existing building exterior follow the style and detail of the original building's aesthetic. Larson Brenner Architects, the original architects of the building, have been contracted to develop the design drawings for this remodel. Enclosing the drive -through will seamlessly transform the structure to a professional office building. P.O. Box 313 • 3549 Lake Elmo Avenue North • Lake Elmo, MN 55042 1-800-879-9231 • [P] 651-439-0177 • [F] 651-439-1065 • www.fivesenses.com Re: Design Review Application for 1150 Stillwater Boulevard Page 2 of 2 Proposed Demolition The proposed demolition related to the original structure will only involve removal of existing concrete curbs, ATM, and equipment related to the bank teller drive-thru. The portion of the existing pylon sign above the brick, including the lighted metal/plastic bank sign and the Daktronics electronic message board, will be removed. Proposed Renovation of the Building Exterior The measures proposed for the renovation are identified on the attached graphic documents. Enclosure of Drive -Through: Three walls will be erected to enclose the space without any change to the existing roof structure. Two windows matching the existing style will be added to the north facing wall and one window matching the existing style will be added to the south facing wall. A double service door will also be added to the south facing wall. All three walls will be finished with materials of construction to match the existing structure. Matching brick will be placed on the wall to the underside of the windows with a precast sill to align with and match the existing structure. The remainder of the wall will be finished with cementfiber siding and trim matching existing siding and colors. Parking: There are currently 36 existing parking spaces, including 2 accessible spaces, and these will remain unchanged. The enclosure of the drive-thru will allow for three new parking spaces along the north side of the renovated structure, as shown on the site plan, for a total of 39 parking spaces. Signage: As noted above, the existing signage above the brick pylon will be removed. The brick pylon will remain in place, with the address left as -is in attached white metal lettering. A precast concrete cap, matching the existing pedestal, will be added to the top of the column where the previous electrical signage is removed. The company logo and name of St. Croix Sensory, Inc. will be added to the column below the address. These elements will be made of similar white painted metal. The attached graphics and photo rendering show the size and look of this change to signage. We would be pleased to provide additional information as required to assist the Historic Preservation Commission with its review of the Design Review Permit Application. Please contact us if we may be of any further assistance. Sincerely, '27-t Charles and Donna McGinle Stonecutters, LLC St. Croix Sensory, Inc. View of existing building and sign from Stillwater Boulevard View of north entrance with existing drive -through at right STII L 'ATLR KOLJLFYARD NORTIJ Proposed New Sign rendering Bank sign and electronic sign removed from top of brick pylon, with new precast cap installed to match existing precast. Existing address signage to remain. New company name and logo each side in white metal or resin letters as shown: letters approximately 7" high; logo images approximately 12" high. New sign area: 6-0 x 2-0 = 12 sf. cd, St. Croix Sensory, Inc. New Signage LOGO detail STEVENS ENGINEERS 1858 LIVINGSTONE ROAD HUDSON. 11ISCONSIN 54018 WWW.STEVENSENGINERRS COM (851)498-2075 (715)388-5819 FAR:(715)988-5879 SHEET DESCRIPTION DIMENSION AND UTILITY PLAN JENNINGS STATE BANK ST►LLWATER, MN 9S00'0£b' IS9 Z8OSS NW 1010M1111S 10011S 41,004 g11oN C08 siDanHD' IH 2oNImaxsa INIOSWIV I u Z ix zg S—b 9—b o-b 4- 11 fJ Np BOWLt M u'1'a uetl® NW 1e as a41 u! paW4o1V Pesu0011 Anp a uw imp pus uo! puedns pap Rw lepun JO GUI Aug pored id seM ue!d *I411s41 141peo Rgae4 N/s 1sseMiIRS 1100N MBAefrto8.MWMNOS OW •aul 5taewg xiara 7S U Id a Veto 4 • 9500'0£4'159 Z8055 MN ra1a.n11!1S Iaa1IS U 1od olioN L08 .SID LIHD'IV 2I�l�Il�t g NOS2I�''I .1111111111111111111111111101 III. ill �LiII I�IIII !�i!I _111PI'I, 11'to/6o 6O$tt # vowel •y ueJ9 Nw egeis ae0 u! peiepJy postman pnp e we I leq pue uaquedns pegp etw iepun io ow Aq pwedwd oeM uetd se41 p41 pie kle,B4 111ll1'11111111il/ NW NNeMIIPS WpN PI IMo6 J7+MIOIS Oct L -au! :LosunS xpuo • S SUOfl A®13'S''N m ate. r E N< W. Elev. & Details St. Cro4r Sensory. Inc. 1190 Stillwater Boolavard North Stillwater, MN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my dined supervision and that 1 am a duly licensed Architect in the State of MN Brian R. Larson i 17409 o4'/7111 LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS. 807 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 651.430.0056 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 28, 2011 APPLICANT: Mike Hoefler, HAF Architects PROPERTY OWNER: Jeff Anderson REQUEST: Design Review of elevation modifications and signage at 229 Main St S for 45 Degrees COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner " CASE NO.: 11-18 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of elevation modifications to 229 Main St S for 45 Degrees. The project calls for the reconstruction of the existing storefront along Main Street to include new wood store front including kick panels, display windows, door, new second floor windows, and new fabric awnings on the second floor. Additionally the plans call for modifications along Water Street and the south building elevation. The plans show a new deck and outdoor display area; however, a parking variance and a special use permit for outdoor use is required prior to the installation of these improvements; therefore, these improvements are not part of the design review approval at this point in time. The building is located in the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National Registry of Historic Districts. The building itself is a contributing building to the Historic District and was built in 1884. 229 Main St S Page 2 Elevation modifications Plans call for elevation modifications along Main Street, Water Street, and the south building elevation. Main St Facade The Downtown Design Manual Guidelines provides direction for storefront facades to restore historic storefronts when feasible. In this case, the old Majestic Theater store front and entrance was set back from Main Street. If a storefront similar to the Majestic storefront was installed a number of potential issues would occur. First, it would create a setback that is not seen along this block. Second, it would create an area where an individual could hide from pedestrians on Main St creating an unsafe situation. Finally, it is not conducive to the reuse of the building as a retail space. For these reasons, staff agrees with the applicant that restoring the original Majestic storefront is not appropriate in this case. Water St Facade Today a dated facade with brick arches and siding exists along Water Street. The plans call for installing store front similar to the one proposed along Main Street with a new wood store front including kick panels, display windows, and door. New lighting is also proposed. Areas not replaced with the storefront will keep the existing siding in place. South Elevation Today the south elevation is a blank concrete wall with utility boxes for phone and the power meter. Plans call for cutting in a smaller version of the entrance plan for along Main St and Water St along with two new window opening. The plans call for adding fabric awnings over the windows along with new lighting. Overall the proposal as submitted meets the intent of the Downtown Design Manual Guidelines for storefront facades. Signage The plans call for one sign facing Main St S and one facing Water St S. The signs will be 4 foot wide by 5 foot tall (20 square feet). they are proposed to be installed parallel to but not flush with the building. This type of sign is consistent in style to a wall style sign. The new sign will be similar to the exiting 45 degrees sign at 209 Main St S. The sign will have the words "45 Degrees Outdoor Gear & Apparel" in black letter. The logo is white lettering on an orange background with a black and white outline. The sign will have a black border. The application is not clear but it appears that the sign will be non -illuminated. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD'...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 27 feet long facing Main 229 Main St S Page 3 St and Water St. The total sign area for each of the proposed sign is 20 square feet, which is smaller than what allowed under the zoning ordinance. The plans call for a projecting style sign with "MAJESTIC" similar to what was in place as seen in photos between the 1910's and 1930's. The size of the sign will be 7'6" wide by 2' tall, which is smaller than the original sign. In addition, the new sign will be non - illuminated unlike the original sign. Since the name of the business is not on the sign and reproduces a historic sign that was in place during the period of influence for the Downtown Historic District, this is permitted as an additional sign. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the requests in whole or in part. 2. Deny the requests. 3. Continue the request for more information. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is June 14, 2011 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for June 6, 2011. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the requested building storefront facade and signage as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. 4. The applicant shall submit a new design review permit for the deck and outside improvements shown on the plan in conjunction with a parking variance and special use permit for the outdoor use by the Planning Commission. Any stair installed to access the new entrance on the south side of the building shall be temporary and no larger then what is needed to meet building code requirements. attachments: Applicant's Form and packet DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: ♦O)Hg Date Filed: lc Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 t% (n 1JLf The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required, Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project e9 ga1.77eStir S Assessor's Parcel No..Ag 0362d ti/oe3 (Required) Zoning District ,6.,6 Description of Project in detail Ste, i4c►Iia-dam. "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner F-F A N oe ck s o nJ Representative Mite 6 "n ff . /eo Mailing Address eke scLo.. ► s F Mailing Address City State Zip S7 \\w its r rs ,J .55.043 L. City State Zip Telephone No. (S' _ 2(d - ttSdLl Telephone No. Signature /,2 (Required) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Signature (Required) HF ARCHITECTS rawe_22-7 s , * 4/h street . 95 ffyr/u�- consists of re - cnna7trrc t i movh street .57fre/ front • as aAN/ at 446019api tteri fhG lam%- Sfr'r cf stor•ef on f to brth `$f / M/s �a r-ic arzl hi 7`h4 f t1 f6.c S/'ns!/i0. 7,z3 - /k) s olfanc!on l thy° *rev/- 140 1� Dc.- FVpas.,/ does Mof t-eprce„f /4-6 o! T � ern`y.►nec ous f%Xs Gt/oaloG '� 14 p�/°o sc�.G `o f.� // s7cd /ice. '� d U�/vla y`v `ivts ellf711. 'ar 07/any pa/we /"�isccG �h%lS �-►C% wdt 5/we,ey- 7 ei /49r9e-eey A'/// 12 rcluic Dw 011.1140"141-5 Gans GUI�'ti deco,�t,',� �lofr� w�� Go%.rh.3 cudod �vi�d �'S c%5f' �C/ow s9 o(�vol k e G✓s6/� ,� � potfc/s. Thc. ,a e f 6�//�%.�/ f' /V/7h / tld1 p eefe1-4 �t //Mt "fd- y�r?� {e new ( s�'h 6� 1-s� �r'G s�'�j�o6Pn-3 �"y�9//'ti/ by//ofrn ,, 5��h The ' 7`hc. 77)6 /�// `�dr� `ray-�oa,�,c.l.xt 7y,,,�w nu G1 Ne �v! � .esaG/a �G ®' co-), �/y�� 5 �/0 y .S -- %hP� 106 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Ph: 651-351-1760 Fax: 651-430-0180 www.hafarchitects.com HAF GROUP ARCNITICTUf 'o11E,E41<"Tloj1 HF A R C N 1 T E C T 5 11111/1,14 YERSGKIM5W* PR iri ;11 77 4 IP ARCHITECT directory HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 10fi EAST CHESTNUT ST., SUITE 101 STILLWATER. MN 55002 CONTACT: M.1A. G. HOEFLER EMAIL: m1.1981 atlMetls.cam PHONE: 051- 51-1T00 FAX 651-0.T0-010U CLIENT JEFF ANDERSON 209 MAIN STREET SOUTH STILLWATER. MN 55002 MAIL: PHONE:551-00.3 09 FAle 45 DEGREES RETAIL ▪ IDDIDEOPEDIETER • INCLUEIDEPORDI N EC YE looSOLSTEIDLIEMEI PO FLICOME PLO RPHIORIG FRC GAGGGPOIDE GC oVERALCODOPPARTICPU Go GRADECREEING OWED OWSLIMBOARD OZ P PC PRECAST CPC:REEF rev PERFORM,' PR PAIR SOOT CaPIENDER index to drawings ARCHITECTURAL: T1 Al A2 PR PR TIRE SHEET MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW date: issue record description: sheet no. 04-15-2011 HPC SUBMITTAL HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTSHt.71F. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING I N T E RI O R S STILLWATER, Nols1 DEVELOPER or OWNER: rx ..... 4*nnowru uxx^tirrAl 20210 SHEET 0H TITTLE SHEET T1 LL u>z 0 mz.0 1E1 1 FABRIC AWNING AND NEW DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW SET INTO EXISTING BRICK OPENINGS PROVIDE BLADE SIGN EXTEND FROM FACE OF BUILDING - SEE NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION RAISE EXISTING BRICK PIER UP TO ORIGINAL ELEVATION AND PROVIDE NEW METAL CAP FLASHING AT TOP OF CAP Ii11;i i'i1i =1 12:IA:I:Qd Is;1;1' ;I;I1I1 I III /d RELOCATE EXISTING FIRE ALARM TO BRICK PIER PROPOSED STEEL LINTEL BEAM - VERIFY UPON REMOVAL OF EXISTING WOOD FASCIA EXTEND EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION OUT TO FACE OF BULKHEAD PROPOSED SIGNAGE PANEL SUSPENDED FROM BRICK PANEL ABOVE WITH ROD AND CLIP FASTENERS PROPOSED STOREFRONT CONSTRUCTION RAISED WOOD PANEL BULKHEAD WRH STILE AND RAIL CONSTRUCTION WOOD COLUMNS WITH ARCHITECTURAL INSETS AND TAPERS WOOD SASH WINDOWS WITH 1• INSULATED CLEAR GLASS HORIZONTAL WOOD RAILS WITH BRIM STOPS FOR SASH INFILL W000 DOOR AND FRAME INSET WITH WIDE TOP RAIL AND STILE INFILLS 111111111111111111111111111111 south main street HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOP MENT CONSTRUCTION HF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE IL ANNING INTERIORS lob EAST tRESTNUT 31. DEVELOPER POWDER SHEET INFORMATION, RELEVATION A2 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION H } 0 d L. 1.11 61 L 9 K' i vac 111 ai II W. 11 III 11 IiIiIUI i HO IIII IIIIIIIIIIII of MIME m Fig $ g d t0 a) a Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 28, 2011 CASE NO.: 11-19 APPLICANT: Mike Hoefler, HAF Architects PROPERTY OWNER: Mike Hoefler, Watermain Crossing LLC REQUEST: Design Review of a new infill building COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 5Q BACKGROUND Watermain Crossing LLC, is planning to develop a new infill building at 229 Main St S located on the vacant area east of the intersection of Main and Olive. The project involves the construction of a two story building with a footprint that is approximately 1,900 square feet in size for a total floor area of approximately 3,800 square feet. The first floor would be some type of retail, restaurant, or office use and the second some type of residential or office use. SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to develop the proposed building, Watermain Crossing LLC needs the following City approvals: 1. Final Design Permit 2. Parking variance 3. Special Use Permit for residential uses 4. Special Use Permit for restaurant uses 229 Main Street South May 2, 2011 Page 2 of 4 Since the project is located in Stillwater's historic downtown district, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review and take action on the design review permit portion of the request. The Planning Commission will consider the variance and any special use permit requests. EVALUATION OF REQUEST This property is located within the City's historic downtown district. Consequently, the design standards found in the Design Manual, Commercial Historic District apply to the project. The applicable pages of the Design Manual are attached. City Staff offers the following comments: 1. In general the level of detail that has been submitted is at a pre building permit stage appropriate for a design review permit. The building is primarily brick with metal cornice, wood store front glass/ doorways with other architectural elements. Proposed colors are included in the packet. 2. Due to flood plain requirements, the building is required to be elevated by one foot above the regulatory flood plain elevation to a height of 693.5 feet; thus, this requires stair to be used along Main Street to access the first floor. Required handicapped access will need to be met. For this, the applicant is proposing an accessible entrance on the Water Street side of the building. 3. Full size architectural and civil engineering drawings will need to be submitted for review prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff will review the final plans submitted for a building permit for consistency with the plans currently before the Commission. 4. The massing of the revised building is compatible with the buildings already on the Nock. 5. With a flat roof, venting and mechanical equipment will not be hidden internally. Since the building is location several blocks from a bluff and the surrounding building are already cluttered with venting and mechanical equipment, staff is not as concerned about screening them from view. The Commission should discuss if there is a need to screen any mechanical and venting systems. Since the roof can be seen from the bluff, a white roof should be avoided. A gray or tan color is preferred. This standard is what the City requires exiting building to follow. 6. A general lighting plan was not submitted by the applicant. Staff verbally discussed lighting with the applicant and he indicated that they plan to use down cast soffit lighting. Staff recommends that the Commission make a condition of approval that the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff has made this a condition of the approval. 7. Due to similarities to the originally building, staff recommends a corner stone be added that lists the year this new building was constructed along with a 4 229 Main Street South May 2, 2011 Page 3 of 4 plaque that indicates this new building was built in a style similar to the prior Peaslee building that was destroyed by a fire and the year the original building was built and destroyed. 8. The plans show a new deck and outdoor seating area; however, a parking variance and a special use permit for outdoor use is required prior to the installation of these improvements; therefore, these improvements are not part of the design review approval at this point in time. ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives they could consider: A. Approval. If the proposed design plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the June 6, 2011 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is June 14, 2011. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the requested infill building as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any signs on the project site. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the City Planner. The lighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit all required permits for building in the flood fringe and evidence from a licensed professional 229 Main Street South May 2, 2011 Page 4 of 4 engineer or architect that all local, regional, state and federal flood fringe development regulations are being followed. 6. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be of a color that matches the adjacent surface. 7. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from Main Street. 8. All trash dumpsters shall be placed inside the trash enclosures. 9. All construction activity shall conform to the City's noise ordinance. Construction during dry periods shall mitigate dust problems. 10. All minor modifications to the final design review permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 11. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate street parking areas from landscape areas. 12. Any of the brick pavers that are disrupted along Main Street shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. 13. Any of the street lights that are disrupted shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. 14. Any required variances and/ or special use permits shall be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. The applicant shall submit a new design review permit for the deck and outside improvements shown on the plan in conjunction with a parking variance and special use permit for the outdoor use by the Planning Commission. attachments: Location Map Color rendering of building Excerpt from Downtown Design Manual Application drawings DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required, Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is re aired . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Assessor's Parcel No. Zoning District= Description of Project in detail / /1 RegJired). "7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative ids not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner / `/ T Mailing Address ic6' = City State Zip Telephone No. 6 7 Signature H:\mcnamara\sheila\: 005\;sign review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Representative Mailing Address_ia.} City State Zip Telephone N. „-` => ( _,) ?k Signat Required) a HAF GROUP A R C H I T E C T S 11211.211162241211126611.62.1.52.60111 • PR 11011111111111111111•111111111111111111111111ilm 11111111011111111111111011111111ifil 11111 1011 0111011111011111111111011111111 1m" Lew 1111111111111111111111111 .5.1,1 111 111111101111111111111111111111111 0111111111111101111111110111111 hismonnummo 111111011111111111111111111111111111 1111 11111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111111 1111 romin 1111111111111 11111111111111111111 ;1! 0 I ARCHITECT directory HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 108 EAST CHESTNUT ST., SURE 101 STILLWATER, MN 55082 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER EMAIL mlke®ha8r hllecla.mm 651451-1750 FAx.1ra0-01R0 -UUUUUUUUU UUUUU III I III IIIII iI%iIiIiI%i] I[iIiIiIiIiIiIil�elGiddd�IiIil�l[dd�I�1�IiIi1�'. IsIsIsIsI,IiId 'IIIIIII //////I,\\\\\ 1 1 PEASLEE BUILDING MSMPTEMM PLO FLAMM PM f mrpso PPWI pmgmq PPOLPIOSPEIMMAP POOP POPISPECOM PPM Pm PREIMPPCAMM ,{Xtrir,9 PEP SQUARE ,PeCil RECEPTOR R PER RPM REIM REFLECMED (PM REQUIRED MOM PIA. STPIPLESSSMEL MIME APPOPOLI PA V 00, index to drawings ARCHITECTURAL: T1 TITLE SHEET Al MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW date: issue record description: sheet no. HAF G R OUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION HM1F- A R C H I T E C T S ARCHITECTURE P l A N I N INTERIORS STILLWATER. MN PEASMOIMPAIM RSPECTIVE 2.210. SHEET OR TITTLE SHEET T1 C) MAIN LEV N RISERS MEEIIVIF711EARN rrr,IrMINHERMIZIT:r-r-rrrr----rrrIIRSIMMIM.17,FligNINErWrr, rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr,,,r-r,rr-rr,;:r.rrr%rrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrIrrrrrirrrrrirrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrrrrrr•rrrrrrrrrr.• • .rrrrirr,rorkr-V • • ^ "ISTATFATIOrc 1,51Ellirrirrrr; •rrrrrrrrrrrriirIrgrraIgrIkr,--------,:rrrrrrarrreirrarrillr"IrrrrrrrrirrrrrrrIrrrrrrrrrgrr• ADJACENT TENANT IrrErrIIRAr • 45 DEGREES RETAIL SPACE m71,i74307747," ISA 17177-rrrrrigling,rwrrirMIFigilliFfrVIERNMENEFF.Irliillirrrr rr7F17:21:11inagi EXISTING MARX RESTAURANT PARKING STALL STALL PARKING STALL UP 21 RISERS iff,-,61113Mgk'4'„ grarrirrtr 45 DEGREES PLAZA -- - LSEOCCONCRETE PLAZA —I FIRE BOX EXISTING MARX OUTDOOR PATIO HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION I 06.EAST.CHESINOL.STREET STILLWATER,MM.55082 PH.65 1 .27 I .7288 HRIF. ARCHITECTS cocc,...cc.,,ccrrrcc ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS PHONE: PA>t 1 06 EASsiu.C40,S011,NIPT ST. STILLWATER, MN 6 3 1 -43 0-0 I S 0 WWW.HAFARCNITECTS.COM WWW.PACEBOOK.COM/HAFRACHITECTS HTTP://HAPASCHITECTSALOGSPOT.COM ...... 4.1* En ..... by. oRnoom NIT SUWON- SHERIF INFORMATION: MAIN LEVEL PLAN: Al PRECAST CONCRETE CORBEL ENDS AT EACH FIER AL ��1� j♦j ill =� �IEIII—--mnnnnmm�nnmm�nM. -- [1. 644 _L,ddllldl•--IIII•oir I •J]'IntPnll•—•bnT4'01141'111114._—= - — _—_—_ -��l�-�RRRa W W W W W W W W W south main street METAL FASCIA TRIM DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS IN PUNCHED BRICK OPENINGS BRICK PIER MISED SIGNAGE PANEL STEEL LINTEL BEAM PROPOSED STOREFRONT CONSTRUCTION RAISED WOOD PANEL BULKHEAD WITH STILE AND RAIL CONSTRUCTION • WOOD COLUMNS WITH ARCHITECTURAL INSETS AND TAPERS • WOOD SASH WINDOWS WITH 11 INSULATED CLEAR GLASS • HORIZONTAL WOOD RAILSWITH TRIM STOPS FOR SASH INFILL • DOUBLE WOOD DOOR AND FRAME INSET HAF GROUP AR CHITECTURE DEVELOP MEN T CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTSHrAF„ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS STILLWATER, MN DEVELOPER OWNER' PE RSPECEIR, .110 INFORMATION. SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATION A2 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION PRECAST CONCRETE CORBEL ENDS AT EACH PIER CONCRETE RAMP CONCRETE PLAZA STEPS METAL FASCIA TRIM DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS IN PUNCHED BRICK OPENINGS BRICK PIER water RAISED BRICK FIRE BOX RAISED SIG.. PANEL STEEL LINTEL BEAM PROPOSED STOREFRONT CONSTRUCTION • RASED WOOD PANEL BULKHEAD WITH STILE AND RAIL CONSTRUCTION • WOOD COLUMNS WITH ARCHITECTURAL INSETS AND TAPERS • WOOD SASH WINDOWS WITH INSULATED CLEAR GLASS • HORIZONTAL WOOD RAILS WITH TRIM STOPS FOR SASH INFILL DOUBLE WOOD DOOR AND FRAME INSET street HAF GROUP ARCHITECTUR E DEVEL OP MEN T CONSTRUCTION ARCHITECTSHr;IF ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS PE ASPECT., 24214, INFORMATION. THEFT EXTERIOR ELEVATION A3 OEXTERIOR ELEVATION Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: April 26, 2011 CASE NO.: 11-20 Holly Arps, Stillwater Olive Oil Co. Design Review of proposed signage for Stillwater Olive Oil Co. 208 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: ZONING: HPC DATE: REVIEWERS: PREPARED BY: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use CBD - Central Business District May 2, 2011 Community Dev. Director Michel Pogge, City Planner Rd DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for Stillwater Olive Oil Co at 208 Main St S The proposed sign face is 29-inches by 13.75- inches for a total of 2.8 square feet The sign is proposed to contain the words "oils & vinegars to sample and savor". The lettering is proposed to be white on a black background. The sign bracket is shaped to resemble an olive branch. Since the name of the business is not on the sign this is permitted as an additional sign. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The sign frame is not counted towards the total area. The total sign of the sign face is 2.8 square feet, which meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 208 Main St S Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. The bottom of the projecting sign must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk. 3. No additional signage without HPC approval. 4. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 2t ILtQrvn. .' Assessor's Parcel No. (Required) Zoning District a D Description of Project in detail '7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner 4 ,v 4`et C ' Mailing Address iV ,Z10 02k Like be. City State Zip S4Po ca., W sizerto Telephone No. 715-4.&/4- 0,Z90 Signature H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Representative /17 A2P.5 Mailing Address 2o' /�%Lyn.�3'�`. S• City State Zip e.547ki ie/ f/t) ESQ z Telephone No.'6%7- iL72- .�%c'y Signaturetl ?equire City Stillwater Names^ t . metiti D (• Jf l .: %444 -4k Address Tn 1JF Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 55082 P}h��tr,e4l - `f 7zzG-GG5 r�' Sjptg j ZipJ 0 Nam St n �1 Phone # t� G Address 1O� • ll Cit State ` 3 /'p 13�c Uaark -ikt rG I h'litoM� 6DSz. ZAttached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. pj Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Size: Dimensions: tie, �/ / y uare Feet 3D x t5 /� -. 25 Setbacks: From Property Line Sign Height: (If freestanding) From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors A „ /, otitt iA Illumination: ❑ Yes (No Materials: 5 ` /s lI . _� If Yes, Type: (iS %Zt� Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 420X- From Bldg 13.75 inches 36 inches 29 inches Materials: black painted iron frame + white vinyl lettering on black vinyl backboard Mount: projecting from building square mount with concrete anchor bolts Lighting: no additional lighting added 32 inches 1 inch : 2 feet Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 27, 2011 APPLICANT: Chad Wichmann CASE NO.: 11-21 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Stillwater Liquor LOCATION: 1920 Market Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C -Commercial ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner " VI�A4 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for two signs at 1920 Market Drive for Stillwater Liquor. The first is facing Market Drive and is proposed to contain the words "Stillwater Liquor" in red channel letters mounted on a raceway. The sign is 288 inches wide by 30 inches tall for a total of 60 square feet in area. The letters of the sign will be internally illuminated. For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's retail space has 100 feet facing Market Drive. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 60 square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 1920 Market Drive Page 2 The second sign faces north and will contain the word "Liquor" in white channel letter mounted on the side of the building. These channels letters are what remains in place after removing a portion of the former MGM Liquor Warehouse sign. The sign is 124 inches wide by 24 inches tall for a total of 20.6 square feet in area. The letters of the sign will continue to be internally illuminated. Technically since this side does not face a public street a sign is not permitted on this wall; however, since the name of the business is not on the sign this is permitted as an additional sign. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourtegh (14) Ogles of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 191M4rke,} Dr Assessor's Parcel No.2 3 0 ©if (Required) Zoning District s — iC, Description of Project in detail N S is A on fj i d q !��-:9m e_ C�t� u�ct�. — �� L+.�r�S �� � � t 5 �e-e- 4"4c c kvvv , "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then Property Owner C s� ()fop Mailing Address 3 3 R;c.h rto of rck City State Zip (ectdroA. voct o f . Lig In Telephone No. 1 Ce V Lheti _ Cote 9-40 Signature (Required) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 property owner's signature is required. Representative Ck ac‘ , Yin Mailing Address V i 5 i2-61.xc lk v i e Li, City State Zip MAT (-e GrcN/e. ww s.3 f ( Telephone No. Ce a e cite 3 • Ce /S Le - Signature (i (Required) TA ALE KITCHM ■ Any font style 5" prefinished aluminum returns Aluminum backs Acrylic faces ■ 1" Trim cap Neon or LED illuminatio U.L. listed ih e use only the highe quality materials along' proven components wr= assembling your s 5" aluminum returns Aluminum backs Acrylic face Clinched and caulked seams Neon illumination Drain holes FRONT VIEW 5" aluminum retums Neon illumination 1" trim cap GTO cable with sleeving "Easy Install" raceway Glass tube supports Electrode boot Transformer with disconnect SIDE VIEW RACEWAY MOUNT Application for Sit 11 Permit Fee: $50.00 cominur1ity Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 . . Location et Sign i Address i Uty 1 Stale bp i i .q amo 1,41,64l- ;Dtalvtz,:,j Stillwater I MN 55082 IApplicant ( ...._, Phone*, N7CL,,,„,a VALI'tyktk, A vu :Stott. e•atzt-tr IA Vrti- i Ai i( c fessi 5 1,..t,44.4.<,ektiity srii 1 4...,z+.0„ [ .'enr.1 State 1,,, .: ner (if different from ":1,mlicant) ,,,. „.„,„.,.................... .............. . „.„ „,.., .... -Nan-=.e „J'hone* i STrLieliglitirrigeei( ..e, A, _,I,„,,L.c..,, _ , tZigt„) L4(itg— 640.14 ,i AdAeD- , V,33,3 Avc,14,4baD0,0 Contractor's Name 1 Name Rcr 51 et .,...., cfee.,,_ 3 oce., L),,.k frAif , tvva p t "IN; I ZiP5Sir C 9 i ..,,,_„„,....,,.....,_, Attached are the following docuiredts (Required to be submitted a-Celia:Ven Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used, if the sign is to be mounted on the building; show an elevation of the building and sign, Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building „-..„ Design Review application (if required). Ail signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. ( I Sign petaus . , Sign Size.: Dimeneions, 1 o, Sq..iare Feet ' -1 Sign HeignyffreestenOing). ! ! Setbacii-7.Pron; Property Lme 1 From DrivewaylP,N Lot , , r CWoTs,,, _ iLe I Materials, pally c ekrb ...:—(74-e-c. ii,,,LItc:(E-,-cce._ — 1.-114175_ 1 lart,s vtkr,A.,iyi,A- e.:44.-"s't & ,I I litumination' KY -es Yes, "Type', ' 1 ''/ Le,,,,IZ 1 Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Owner Sr.atne ((e•quffedi Applicant Signature Review (For office use only) n Approved 0 Denied Permit St. Conditions for aPProva Date By Date / 471/ Datey * Contractor must be licensed with theCityof Stdtwater, Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S \PlanningTorms1Applicabon tor Sign permit doc Updated September 23. 2006 41C'e fairtsiieniinen Memo Community Development Department To: From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 Heritage Preservation Commission Re: Extension of Design Permit 2009-30 for the demolition of a garage at 429 Pine St W Message: Richard Van Horne, property owner of 223 Pine St W has requested a one year extension to the approved design permit to demolish his garage. The Heritage Preservation Commission approved the design permit on September 9, 2009. City Code Section 31-204, Sub 6(a) and (b) states that all permits are void after 24 months after approval. This section allows the original approving body to extend the life of the permit for up to one additional year. The City has not made a change to any ordinance that would affect this request and staff sees no reason a similar request would not be approved today. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission made a motion to approve an extension of design permit 2009-30 to September 10, 2012. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4ti, Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us City Hall 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 April 6, 2011 Heritage Preservation Commission, I respectfully request an extension to the Demolition Permit #2009-30. Sincerely, Richard Van Horne 223 Pine St. West Stillwater, Mn. 55082 612-865-7425 HE 6!P.«t+Pi a :; is 0t !NN ES o'.a Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planne> Date: Thursday, April 21, 2011 Re: North Lowell Park and Pedestrian Walkway Message: The open house on March 28 for the North Lowell Park/Pedestrian Walkway project was well attended. Overall the comments on the project were constructive and very positive from staff's perspective. The main comments from the open house covered three general areas: 1. Overall preferred design of the project The comments heard from the meeting along with a wide majority of the written comments (9 of the 15) preferred the straight alignment versus the curving design. Due to these comments, the design team is moving forward with the straight alignment. During the open house, three alternatives were shown. The preferred alternative was the rectilinear formal walkway design. The Council on March 15 indicated that they preferred the rectilinear walkway concept with limestone outcropping and a natural meandering trail. The attached maps provide additional details on both the formal and natural rectilinear walkway concepts. The City Council discussed the design of the project at their April 19th meeting and directed staff to proceed with the formal concept. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th Street -Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us 2. Location of the bathroom Verbal and written comments from the open house expressed a strong desire for moving the bathroom westerly. In selecting the final bathroom location, there are a number of factors that should be considered including: a. Users of the bathroom i. Main Street Visitors ii. Park Users iii. Bike Trail Users b. Viewshed of the park c. Fact that there are currently no buildings east of Water Street between Myrtle St and Mulberry St. d. Several comments received at the open house asked that some type of shelter be provided for people waiting for the MTC bus that picks up along Water St. The City Council disused the bathroom location at their April 19th meeting. For that meeting two possible locations for a bathroom facility for each concept were shown. The Council directed staff to proceed with the bathroom on the west side of Water Street. 3. Bathroom design Seven bathroom designs were shown at the open house. Overwhelmingly the preferred design was a brick historic industrial design, which follows a number of similar style buildings seen in the northern part of downtown. Some comments received at the open house encourage the City to consider a "Victorian" design. The design team looked at the Victorian design of the bathroom in Washington Square Park that was suggested by several individuals at the open house; however, with no similar design buildings currently existing in downtown Stillwater, the team has concerns introducing such a design and is recommending against it. The Design Team has further refined the industrial design. The design removes the steel elements seen in the first design and replaces them with wood elements that follows a style seen on the existing gazebo in Lowell Park. The front wall of the bathroom now also incorporates a commercial storefront look. The City Council disused this new bathroom design at their April 19th meeting. At the meeting the council directed the design team to go back to the drawing board and consider a more Victorian design. There was also discussion about the roofline and the importance of keeping a low profile roof in order to keep views open. It was determined that we should avoid the tall roof design seen in Washington Square. Staff will present a number of various building designs to the City Council, Park Board, and HPC in May in hopes to pin down a preferred design that we can use to develop a bathroom architectural design from. Moving Forward The steps over the next 60 days are as follows: 1. On May 3rd at 4:30 Bill Hickey from Collaborative Design Group to complete a visual building survey on the new bathroom building being design for the pedestrian walkway at the City Councils May workshop. The HPC and Parks Commission are invited to participate in that discussion. 2. SWB will work to finalize the overall master plan for North Lowell Park and plans for the walkway for staff review in early May. 3. City Staff will continue to check in with the City Council, HPC, and Parks Commission, likely at every meeting. 4. Staff is hopeful we will be in a position to host an open house in June or July to review the final plans with the public. Once the above steps are completed we will move to final plan development. Staff is still anticipating a fall project letting at this point in time. Request Review and comment on the proposed plans. 9_011714 SFrOND-STREEET - - - - _ — 1 = // J w --- J u( SOUTH UNION STREET - - -- - - to --- ui I— N / — —� \ a .— / \ ur \ Amami I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1_ --SQUT+�MAIN-STREET- - --_ � 1 1 IIIIIII) i� 2 II '/ u1 II \ a \ \ N L___ \\� CUATER ST. CROIX RIVER 0' 25' 50' 100' NORTH \ SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinc®usinternet.com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the lows of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By gaj Original Issue Date: 04/14/11 Revision: Date: Description: FORMAL CONCEPT SHEET: CF \ / 7 SOUTH SECOND_ STREEET- - - - -- ---- -- _- 111 = 1— �.` — to 1 II I I —...I (/N w 2 4 1- 7 /- w \ Q \ t- ( 4) 111111111 - -SOUT1-1MAIN-STREET- - - - E. II111111) LATER STREET nun. AN.uuummnhmnumul PARKIN _ — IIIIII��II�t1IID ST. CROIX RIVER 0' 25' 50' 100' NORTH • — • i f f NORTH MAIN STREET\ 4 / / I ��9 O --I SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6617 E—mail: swbincetusinternet.com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By gal Original Issue Date: 04/14/11 Revision: Date: Description: NATURAL CONCEPT SHEET. CN NORTH MAIN STREET BUS STOP WATER STREET- - - - - -' PARKING PARKING 1.IF � �LAILN _,Itw/ 4 PARKING 1 %/! f I I LAWW �`%fir' 1-- ,1 0 Olt Ailir ..��, r 1 IZ.,111���. NMI �Z _'>lk��� SZ:•�:,1�7t� err_ rSl LAIA.N FORMAL CONCEPT 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH MAIN STREET NATURAL CONCEPT WALKWAY DETAIL " - NORTH WALKWAY DETAIL 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinc®usinternet.com LOWELL PARK PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By. goj Original Issue Date: 04/14/11 Revision: Dote: Description: CONCEPT DETAILS SHEET: CD 0 COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,... .....,..i......100. 5.All 1111mmilm 55R,1 611V313 Ma nig MI Wm .....180eiftriemperipo LOWELL PARK Stillwater, MN TOILET ROOMS - SCHEMATIC DESIGN SCHEME #5 LA? t 043411 v-cr SK-01 OY SY 11025.00 0190UP, INC_ 2009 i Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: REQUEST: April 21, 2011 18th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards HPC DATE: May 2, 2011 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner ge DISCUSSION Annually since 1994, the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission has selected individuals and business to receive one of their annual Heritage Preservation Awards. These awards are given out in May as part of National Preservation Month. The Commission should select the award recipients at your May meeting in order to allow time for staff to order the plaques for presentation at the May 17th City Council meeting. As a reference point, below is a listing of previous recipients. 1994 Pure Renovation Facade New Development New Design 1995 Renovation/ Reuse Restoration - Signage New Development 1996 Renovation Reuse Facade Signage St. Croix Designs Architectural Antiques Glassory Block Wrap and Ship Commander Elevator J.P. Laskin The Depot The Lumber Baron's Hotel Cub Foods Cameo Costumes Traditions 2011 - 18th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 2 1997 Reuse of an Existing Building New Development Facade of a Building Signage 1998 Re -Use of an Existing Bldg New Development Facade of a Building Signage 1999 Reuse of an Existing Bldg Renovation of a Bldh Facade of a Building Signage Special Achievement 2000 Renovation of a Building Signage Heritage Design 2001 Reuse of an Existing Building Signage Use of Outdoor Space Design 2002 Special Achievement Award Design Award Facade of a Building Signage Architectural Contributions to Stillwater The Grand Banquet Hall A.B.S. Company Building Loggers Sebastian Joe's Maple Island Hardware Wash. County Historical Society Carriage House Sammies Womens Casual Attire Tasteful Thymes & Grandma's House in Stillwater Images of the Past John Karst Building BP Amoco BP Amoco Randall J. Raduenz Mark S. Balay Architects LaBelle Vie Freight House The Stillwater Territorial Prison Hotel Design River Market Community Coop and The Valley Bookseller Dreamcoat Cafe Camrose Hill Flower Studio Ascension Episcopal Church James Melton Joseph Wolf Building Jarchow and York Building Let there be light Antique Lighting Michael McGuire 2011 - 18th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 3 2003 Facade of a Building Transition of a Building Signage Heritage Award 2004 Signage Preservation Effort Historical Contribution Building Reuse Collaboration in Reuse of a Property 2005 Signage Facade of a Building Renovation of a Building Heritage Award 2006 Signage Renovation of a Building Renovation of a Building Residential rescue and restoration Residential Renovation 2007 Renovation of a Building Facade Renovation of a Building Signage Use of Outdoor Space Darla's Grill & Malt Shop Marx Wine Bar and Grille Brunswick Inn The Brick Ally The Central Hub The Peace House Donald Empson Kathleen Vadnais Gartner Studios Terra Springs Toy Lounge Whitey's The Arcola Building Warden's House Museum Aprille's Showers Tea Room 120 Main St N Tom and Sherry Armstrong Teddy Bear Park Barn Steven Bremer Former Joseph Wolf Brewery Building Thomas F Huninghake 209ThirdStN John and Kim Brach 911 6th Ave S Stillwater Public Library 224 3' d St N Charlsen Trucking 114 Churchill St W Stillwater Art Guild Gallery 402 Main St N Stones Restaurant 324 Main St S 2011 - 18th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 4 2008 Sesquicentennial Award For Long Term and Continual Preservation Signage and Building Mural Residential Preservation Residential Preservation Residential Preservation 2009 All awards in 2009 were: For personal contributions to the preservation efforts within the City of Stillwater Historic Washington County Courthouse 101 Pine St W Pulp Fashion 102 Main St N Brent and Christine Peterson 502 Churchill St W David Johnson and Carroll Davis -Johnson 411 Sixth St S Gaye Lundstrom 907 Willard St W Mark Balay Brent Peterson Suki Thomsen Kay Thueson 2010 Facade Restoration of a Building Award Facade Restoration of a Building Award Residential Rescue and Restoration Award Gartner Studios 132 Main Street South Arlen and Jill Rivard 208 Main Street South Karen Dahlquist and Steve Olesen 519 Laurel Street West A copy of the 2010 HPC cases have been attached that can been used as a reference list by the Commission. RECOMMENDATION Please bring any thoughts about possible awards and bring a list of your nominations to the May 2nd meeting. 1 HPC Case Report for 2010 Case # Request Address HPC Date Action Vote HP2009-019 107 3RD ST N 4/5/2010 Approved Design review of new construction of a multi use retail/office building Applicant(s): TRINITY LUTH CHURCH STILLWATER HAF ARCHITECTS, MICHAEL MONN 6-0 HP2009-042 228 CHESTNUT ST E #4EURO SLN 1/4/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review for sigange Applicant(s): PROPERITES LLC, GARNTER HP2010-001 510 OLIVE ST W 1/4/2010 Approved 6-0 Demolition of garage Applicant(s): MARTHALER, DOUGLAS & KELLY J HP2010-002 1220 4TH AVE S 1/4/2010 Approved 6-0 Demolition of residence and garage and infill review Applicant(s): O'BRIEN, TERRY AND CATHERINE HP2010-003 200 2ND ST N 4/5/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for city parking ramp Applicant(s): CITY OF STILLWATER, CITY OF STILLWATER HP2010-004 1950 NORTHWESTERN AVE 3/1/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for Edward Jones Applicant(s): LLC, NORTHWESTERN PROP HP2010-005 208 MAIN ST S OLIVE OIL 3/1/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for Stillwater Olive Oil Co Applicant(s): ARPS, HOLLY J STILLWATER OLIVE OIL CO, HOLLY J ARPS HP2010-006 221 CHESTNUT ST E 4/5/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review signage - Lost Treasures Applicant(s): BROWNSTONE PROP, STILLWATER'S T HP2010-007 200 CHESTNUT ST E 4/5/2010 Approved Design review of new tenant logo within existing sign - Common Grounds Coffee Shoppe Applicant(s): LLC, CHESTNUT AARON AND STACIE BERG, 6-0 Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Case # Request Address HPC Date Action Vote HP2010-008 201 MAIN ST S 5/3/2010 Approved 7-0 Design review of renovation of building exterior Applicant(s): LLC, GARTNER PROPERTIES LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS, BRIAN LARSON HP2010-009 415 SHERBURNE ST S 5/3/2010 Approved 6-1 Demolition of 1-1/2 story duplex and approval of an infill design review permit Applicant(s): SCHAFFER, STEPHEN F HP2010-010 2080 MARKET DR 5/3/2010 Approved 7-0 Design review of signage for Dollar Tree Applicant(s): CHASE PROPERTIES LTD, STILLWATER MP I LLC HP2010-011 1117 BROADWAY ST N 6/7/2010 Tabled 6-0 Demolition of the southern portion of a residence Applicant(s): MIDDLETON, GEORGE I & KATHLEEN HP2010-012 150 3RD ST S 7/7/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for Ultima Bellezza hair salon Applicant(s): COLEMAN, MARY HP2010-013 1700 TOWER DR W 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Reface existing monument sign Applicant(s): WEST TOWER PARTNERSHIP, WEST TOWER PARTNERSHIP SPECTRUM SIGN SYSTEMS, INC HP2010-014 127 WATER ST S Design review of outside eating area and signage 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Applicant(s): ST CROIX PRESERVATION CO INC, ST CROIX PRESERVATION CO INC HP2010-015 14304 60TH ST N 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage Applicant(s): GUSTO PARTNERS OF STILLWATER, GUSTO PARTNERS OF STILLWATER HP2010-016 106 MAIN ST S 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage Applicant(s): INVESTMENTS LLC, RHR HP2010-017 402 MAIN ST N 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage Applicant(s): BRINE, JOHN & THERESA Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 2 of 6 1 Case # Request Address HPCDate Action Vote HP2010-018 132 MAIN ST S Design review of exterior changes Applicant(s): PROPERITES LLC, GARNTER 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS, BRIAN LARSON HP2010-019 229 MAIN ST S 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of restaurant with outside seating Applicant(s): BRASS, FREDERICK W HP2010-020 103 MAIN ST N 6/7/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage for Lucky's Station LLC Applicant(s): OGREN PROPERTIES GROUP, OGREN PROPERTIES GROUP HP2010-021 1850 GREELEY ST S 7/7/2010 Approved Design review for the renovation of exisitng manufacturing/office building to early childhood family center Applicant(s): PROPERTIES LLC, JOHNSON KELLOGG 5-0 HP2010-022 920 4TH AVE S 7/7/2010 Withdrawn Demolition request of residence Applicant(s): SYVERSON, MARY H HP2010-023 308 CHESTNUT ST E 7/7/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage Applicant(s): STELLA LLC STELLA LLC, LIESL BENSON HP2010-024 110 MAIN ST S 8/2/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of projecting sign for Alesci Gallery Applicant(s): LYNSKEY, BARBARA L ALESCI GALLERY, SCOTT ZAHREN HP2010-025 221 MYRTLE ST E 8/2/2010 Approved 5-1 Signage and awnings for Paiement Law Office Applicant(s): LTD, DAN LANG HOMES PAIEMENT LAW OFFICE, JOSEPH AND CONSTANCE PAIEMENT HP2010-026 N/A N/A 8/2/2010 Withdrawn Design review of a fence to be located on a strip of land located in front of 333 Main St N Applicant(s): FINANCING, LOFTS OF STILLWATER HP2010-027 413 NELSON ST E 8/2/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of exterior window and door replacement Applicant(s): NEW STILLWATER PROJECT LTD, NEW STILLWATER PROJECT LTD Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 3 of 6 1 Case # Request Address HPC Date Action Vote HP2010-028 718 PINE ST W 8/2/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of a garage with an accessory dwelling unit Applicant(s): SMITH, LUCY L HP2010-029 106 MAIN ST S 8/2/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage for J.G. Hause Applicant(s): INVESTMENTS LLC, RHR J.G. HAUSE, HP2010-030 145 NEW ENGLAND PL 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Design review of restaurant Applicant(s): LLC, LIBERTY PROP MGT PATRIOTS TAVERN, BRIAN PILRAIN HP2010-031 223 CHESTNUT ST E BOOKS 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Design review of signage for Chestnut Street Books Applicant(s): BROWNSTONE PROP, STILLWATER'S T CHESTNUT ST BOOKS, CEILIA LOOME HP2010-032 1980 MARKET DR PIZZA 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Design review of signage for $5 Pizza Applicant(s): CHASE PROPERTIES LTD, STILLWATER MP I LLC SIGNS BY RSG, HP2010-033 14450 60TH ST S 8/2/2010 Administrative Approval Design review of signage for Sherwin Williams Applicant(s): KEATS, L.L. HP2010-034 1213 MYRTLE ST W 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Demolition of rear portion of residence Applicant(s): EARHART, BRUCE HP2010-035 202 MAIN ST S 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Design review of signage for Art n Soul Applicant(s): ARLEN & JILL RIVARD, 200 MAIN ST LLC ART AND SOUL, HP2010-036 • 216 MAIN ST S SISTERS Design review of signage for The Fun Sisters Applicant(s): LYNSKEY, BARBARA ST. CROIX SIGN, 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 4 of 6 Case # Request Address HPC Date Action Vote HP2010-037 105 NEW ENGLAND PL 130 DANCE 9/9/2010 Approved 4-0 Design review of signage for Revolution Dance Applicant(s): PROPERIES LLC, FONG DEMARS SIGNS, CHAUNCEY PETERSON HP2010-038 1709 GREELEY ST S 10/4/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage fo Paws and Claws Applicant(s): LCL INVEST LLC PAWS & CLAWS STILLWATER, DANIEL LODGE HP2010-039 105 NEW ENGLAND PL 10/4/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for Pure Yoga Applicant(s): ORECK, MICHAEL PURE YOGA, HP2010-040 2000 WASHINGTON AVE 10/4/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage Applicant(s): KEZIAH PROPERTIES LLC, HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS HP2010-041 105 NEW ENGLAND PL 11/1/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for tenants Applicant(s): ORECK, MICHAEL DEMARS SIGNS, CHANCY PETERSON HP2010-042 2100 TOWER DR W 11/1/2010 Approved 5-0 A 24 x 50 foot addition to Abrahamson Nursery Applicant(s): SANDAGER, L DANIEL & SUSAN K HP2010-043 1413060TH ST N 11/1/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of elevation modifications Applicant(s): PROPERTIES, RUSTAD LARSON BRENNER ARCHITECTS, BRIAN LARSON HP2010-044 232 MAIN ST N 11/1/2010 Approved 5-0 Design review of signage for Acorn Direct Applicant(s): LLC, GARTNER PROP HP2010-045 215 MAIN ST S 12/6/2010 Approved 6-0 Renovation of front facade Applicant(s): PELLIZZER, MICHAEL THE GREEN ROOM STANTON SCHMITT Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 5 of 6 Case # Address HPC Date Action Request Vote HP2010-046 2200 FRONTAGE RD W 12/6/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage for Crossings Inn and Suites Applicant(s): SCENIC SIGN CORPORATION SCENIC SIGN CORPORATION, JESSICA HP2010-047 220 3RD ST S 12/6/2010 Approved 6-0 Design review of signage for Avante Salon Applicant(s): PETERSON, BRUCE A & NORMA J TRUSTEES AVANTE SALON, TERESA DZIUK Thursday, April 21, 2011 Page 6 of 6