Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-04-11 CPC PacketTHE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF MEETING MONDAY, April 11, 2011 The City of Stillwater Planning Commission will meet on Monday, April 11, 2011 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street. City of Stillwater Planning Commission regular meetings are held at 7 p.m on the second Monday of each month. All City Planning Commission meetings are open to the public. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF March 14, 2011 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Commission may reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item. 4.01 Case No. 2011-10. A Special Use Permit and a Zoning Text Amendment to allow early childhood education in the RA, Single Family Residential District and the RB, Two Family Residential District by special use permit to construct an Early Childhood Education Facility located at 523 Marsh Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District BWBR, Steve Erickson, representing Stillwater Area Public School District. 4.02 Case No. 2011-11. A zoning text amendment to the CTR, Cove Traditional Residential District, regarding garages. Alpine Capital, LLC, applicant. 4.03 Case No. 2011-04. A rezoning of certain properties within the City of Stillwater to make them consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. City of Stillwater, applicant. 5. OTHER BUSINESS 5.01 Discussion of vendor sales draft ordinance CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800 • WEBSITE: www.crstillwater.mn.us CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 CALL TO ORDER Chair Dahlquist called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Present: Aron Buchanan, Mike Dahlquist, Matt Gullick, Eric Hansen, Mike Kocon, John Malsam, Councilmember Menikheim, Ann Seiss and Charles Wolden Staff present: Community Development Director Turnblad and Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Scott Spisak APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Kocon, seconded by Mr. Hansen, moved approval of the Feb. 14, 2011, minutes. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2011-05. A variance to the parking regulations (17 parking spaces required, 12 spaces requested) for the Chilikoot Cafe located at 826 4th Street South in the CA, General Commercial District. Lee Stylos, applicant. Mr. Pogge reviewed the request and staff findings. He noted that a variance was previously granted for 11 parking spaces, and he noted the proposed use is permitted in this zoning district. He said the proposed use requires 22 parking spaces, leaving a deficit of five spaces over the previously granted variance; he said at one time there was a variance granted for a pizza shop that would have met the parking requirements, but that variance expired because the use was discontinued for more than one year. He reviewed the criteria for granting a variance. Mr. Kocon asked about the existing parking deficiencies in the immediate area; Mr. Pogge reviewed the adjacent businesses and parking spaces. Mr. Kocon asked about the distance from any City parking lot; Mr. Pogge estimated that at about 2+ blocks and noted this site is outside of the downtown parking management district. Mr. Buchanan asked how parking requirements are determined, whether that is based on full capacity at any one time; Mr. Pogge said it is based on square footage and use. Mr. Dahlquist asked if consideration is given to businesses in a Neighborhood Commercial District, such as this, where there might be a certain amount of foot traffic versus vehicular traffic; Mr. Pogge stated there is no consideration given to that factor. Mr. Buchanan asked if neighboring businesses had been contacted for input; Mr. Pogge stated notices were sent to property owners within 350 feet of the site and said two letters, included in the agenda packet, had been received from adjoining owners opposed to the variance. A representative of the applicant was present. He stated as a cafe and bike shop, the business would be promoting a healthy lifestyle; he said it is hoped a fair about of the traffic will be cycling traffic rather than car traffic and said they had received a fair amount of feedback from neighbors who are looking forward to having a place that they can walk to. Ms. Seiss questioned the location adjacent to other business of the same uses; the applicant's representative said they have a different business plan and type of business than the existing one and he suggested they will bring another choice to the neighborhood. Mr. Buchanan asked if there is any estimate of the 1 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 amount of foot traffic versus vehicular traffic that might utilize the business; the applicant's representative stated they have no good estimate but are hoping to promote that. Mr. Dahlquist opened the public hearing. Shelly Rambout, owner of the Bikery, directly across the street, said she was not notified of this meeting. She said she was notified by customers of hers who are very concerned about parking. She said parking will be an issue and will be a problem. Pauline Gates, 741 Fischer Circle, questioned what need this new business will meet that is not already being served by the Bikery. She also noted that people who come to a coffee shop tend to do so at the same time of day so parking will be a problem, with people parking in front of private residences in the neighborhood. Ellie Samuelson, 904 S. Third St., asked about hours of operation. She said her primary concern was with parking, as that is already a problem. She also questioned why spaces at the second-hand store and Charlsen Trucking were mentioned in discussing the parking deficiencies in the area. Mr. Pogge explained that he was not trying to imply that individuals could park in someone else's parking lot, he was•just giving an overview of the parking situation in the adjacent area. Audrin Hayes, 8883 Jane Road N., Lake Elmo, an employee of the Bikery, expressed concern about parking. Steve Meister, Meister's Bar and Grill, noted the proposal is for a bike shop and cafe and said noise shouldn't be of concern to anyone. Regarding parking, he said this is a South Hill business district, which is itself a hardship as it is the only intersection in the City in a residential area with a business on all four corners. He noted that Churchill between Third and Fifth and Fourth Street from Willard to Hancock are exempt from the even -odd winter parking ordinance because it is a business district area. He said there is a lot of on -street parking in those four blocks and said he didn't have any concern with another business. He said this is a South Hill business district that he would like to see become a destination where people have an option. The more people in the area, the better it will be for businesses in the area, he said. His only concern, he said, was on Saturday's when cyclists come with their bikes on their cars and leave the cars all day while they. are out cycling. Ms. McAllister, 8883 Jane Road N., Lake Elmo, related her experiences picking up and dropping her son and her other children off at the Bikery and said parking in the area is an issue. The resident of 520 Second St. S., whose daughter also is an employee of the Bikery, expressed concern about parking, saying she has experienced the problem herself when dropping her daughter off at work or visiting the shop herself for pleasure. No other comments were received, and the hearing was closed. The applicant's representative addressed the comment regarding the difference between the Bikery and this business, noting that he thought the Bikery was primarily a bakery and coffee shop, while this will be a cafe with menu. Regarding hours of operation, he said this would be primarily a breakfast and lunch business, although the definite hours of operation have not been established yet. On the cycling side of the business, he said there is a cycling club in Stillwater that is looking for a shop to affiliate with; he said this would be a full -service, full -line retail shop. He said they would educate CITY OF 2 STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 members of the cycling club on not parking on streets in the area. Regarding the parking issue, he said he understands it is a busy area; he said the residential location is part of what appeals to the businesses and said they plan to be a resident -friendly business. Mr. Kocon asked how the neighborhood has changed in the years since the variance for the pizza shop was granted. Mr. Pogge said overall, the development pattern is essentia►ly what existed at that time. Mr. Kocon noted that, with the possible exception of the consignment shop which has adequate on -site parking, all of the businesses in this Neighborhood Commercial District have historically had the ability to "over park." Mr. Pogge pointed out that the Bikery and architects' office are fairly close to being compliant with parking regulations. Mr. Malsam asked about the full capacity of the proposed cafe/restaurant; the applicant's representative said that has not yet been determined, but estimated there might be room for 40. Ms. Seiss asked whether the former pizza shop was take-out or sit-down; Mr. Pogge stated it was both uses. Ms. Seiss asked whether the majority of businesses in the area meet at least half of the required parking; Mr. Pogge responded in the negative. Mr. Kocon pointed out every business in the district is deficient in parking and contributes to the parking problem and the Commission is being asked to either exacerbate the existing problem or deny someone the use of their business property because of a parking issue. Mr. Dahlquist referred to a comment made by Mr. Meister that if there isn't parking, people won't visit a business, so the problem is in a sense self-limiting. Mr. Wolden asked about the impact of the Krummenacher case on the granting of variances, noting that in the downtown area, the City was able to get around the need for variances by providing an alternative parking plan, which isn't available here. Mr. Pogge said he had visited with City Attorney Magnuson regarding this case and noted the City willingly established a zoning district that set up a situation like this; he talked of the possibility of creating a parking impact district which businesses pay into and then create the parking in the future, but he noted costs could be high and it might not be appropriate in an historic residential neighborhood. Mr. Menikheim asked about the exemption from the odd -even winter parking; Mr. Pogge said he was not aware of that, but would check into that. Mr. Buchanan noted that the actual parking deficiency is not five, but is actually 16 spaces, nearly 300% more than what is required; he noted an overwhelming majority of the people spoke to the fact that parking is a problem. Mr. Buchanan suggested that staff might want to look at giving consideration to foot traffic when determining parking requirements, and also suggested that staff look into establishing a time limit, perhaps two-hour parking in the area to address the issue raised by Mr. Meister of people parking their cars on the street for an extended period of time. Mr. Malsam suggested there is an issue of fairness involved, noting there are already businesses in the area and to single out one business and say it is the cause of the parking problem and others are not, would not be fair; he also suggested there is a benefit of having a lot of people in the area to create a vibrant business environment. Mr. Hansen agreed that it is would be better to have a business there that is thriving than to have an empty building because everyone is deficient in parking spaces. Mr. Menikheim noted the area is zoned commercial but suggested there needs to be more staff research done as to how other communities handle such situations; he also suggested perhaps a solution lies in the formation of a business association for the area to address issues of concern.. Mr. Menikheim suggested tabling the request at this time, pending such research. Mr. Kocon asked about the possibility of permit parking for residents; Mr. Pogge said the City has avoided that as it leads to many difficult situations. Ms. Seiss said she liked the idea of a two-hour parking limit; Mr. Turnblad noted this is a residential, mixed -use neighborhood and a two-hour limit has a negative impact on residents and the ability of have guests, which both permit and two-hour parking do, but agreed that it might be possible to do two-hour parking in front of the businesses only. 3 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 Mr. Kocon moved to approve the request with the condition that two-hour parking be established on the four quadrants of the Neighborhood Commercial District. Mr. Turnblad noted that the parking restriction would have to be passed by the City Council. Mr. Turnblad suggested that approval could be contingent on the Council approving the suggested two-hour parking restriction; if the Council does not approve the parking restrictions, the request would come back to the Commission for reconsideration. Mr. Kocon changed his motion to reflect the wording suggested by Mr. Turnblad and clarified the area where he would want the two-hour parking established. Mr. Buchanan seconded the motion. Mr. Dahlquist questioned whether the motion should be to recommend that the Council consider establishing the two-hour parking area, rather than making Council approval of the parking restriction a condition of the Commission's approval. Mr. Kocon said he thought it appropriate to reconsider the request if the Council does not approve the parking restriction. Mr. Hansen asked if there was a concern about throwing out a possible solution — the two-hour parking limit — without hearing from other businesses in the district; Mr. Turnblad said he thought it would be sufficient to allow business owners to testify at the Council's hearing on the parking restriction and noted that if the Council is not comfortable with the recommendation and testimony, it could send the matter back to the Commission. Mr. Buchanan raised the issue of the second criteria for the granting of a variance and the Krummenacher decision and asked how others felt. Mr. Wolden said he would be voting against the motion because of that issue, and also because he felt the condition regarding parking limitations should be a recommendation rather than a condition. Mr. Dahlquist called the question. Motion passed 5-3, with Mr. Buchanan, Gullick and Wolden voting no. Case No. 2011-06. A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, and 2.5 feet requested) for the construction of a deck landing and stairs located at 702 Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Brendon Stryhn, representing David Handley, applicant. The applicants were present. Mr. Pogge reviewed the request and staff findings. He noted that in all after -the -fact requests, the variance request is treated as if the improvement is not in place. He also noted there are several alternatives that would enable the deck/stairs to be constructed without the need for a variance. He reviewed the three requirements for granting of a variance and stated staff finds against two of the three, with denial recommended. On a question by Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Pogge stated that pavers/patio do not have setback requirements; a raised deck must meet setbacks of the principal structure. Brendon Stryhn, the original developer, reviewed the history of the project. He stated the steps were added due to a drainage issue with the neighbor to the rear of the property; he explained that he raised the whole side of the yard and added a retaining wall to deal with drainage issues, which pretty much eliminated access from the house to the garage. He said he decided to extend the deck over and place the stairs there because it was the only access he could provide to the garage without going back to Planning and Heritage Preservation Commission; also, he said, because he was building on the original footprint, he was not required to have a survey map and thought there was more room. Regarding moving the steps, he said there is a major drain tile field in place to keep the garage from flooding. Dave Handley, current resident, said they recently purchased the property and are proud of being part of taking an historic property and giving it new life; he said they were unaware of the outstanding issues involved until several weeks after moving into the home and said they have become somewhat of a referee between the City and builder, who they believe acted in good faith throughout the project. Mr. Kocon asked why the steps couldn't be 2.5' farther into the property and the deck 2.5' shorter to met setbacks. Mr. 4 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 Stryhn said he could have done that but didn't know exactly where the lot line was; he said he built the stairs and deck as they are to get as much drainage as possible. Mr. Dahlquist opened the public hearing. Colleen Walsh, 706 Churchill, said the lot line was an issue for the 2+ years of project construction. She said the stairway is an obstruction that almost juts into her yard and suggested there is no reason the stairs couldn't be up against the garage. She later said the 2.5 feet is important to her — it's her yard. Co-owner of the James Mulvey Inn, immediately across Harriet Street from the property, talked of the many problems Mr. Stryhn encountered with the project, which he said removed a dilapidated property that was a scourge on the neighborhood. He spoke of how accommodating Mr. Stryhn was doing the project and talked of the problem created by the requirement to retain the original garage and stay in the footprint of the original house. He said he thought it would be unreasonable to force the developer to spend $3,000-$4,000 to take 2.5' off a deck. Kevin Pamprin, 805 Churchill, said it was nice to see a house in the neighborhood that has been retrofitted. He agreed that the 2.5' means nothing, noting that many of the houses in the area are not in conformance. Betsy Glennon, owner of the property to the north with the drainage problem, said Mr. Stryhn and his workers were exemplary partners and very accommodating during the project. She said she failed to see how this would not be a financial hardship to the developer after he spent nearly three years working with the City on the many different issues. No other comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Handley said he and his wife feel very strongly that it is not practical to move the steps and retain the functional purpose of the deck; he showed graphics of the site to indicate this would eliminate an access point that was part of the original function of the design. He said eliminating the steps would require walking on the street to gain access to the house. Mr. Buchanan clarified that the deck and stairs were in place prior to the Handleys' purchase of the home. Mr. Pogge noted that even though the current property owner didn't create the issue, the builder was notified of the problem and he should have disclosed this to the property owner. In discussion, it was noted that a certificate of occupancy was not issued due to a number of building issues; Mr. Pogge stated a temporary certificate of occupancy has been issued because the other building issues have been resolved. Several members congratulated Mr. Stryhn on his workmanship on this project. Mr. Buchanan referred to a previous case where a property owner was required to move a fence that was installed by a contractor who had failed to meet setbacks. Mr. Kocon reiterated that the Commission must look at this as if the improvement hadn't been done and the Commission is looking at a space that is occupied that shouldn't be occupied; in spite of the hardship and issue of expense, he said this is encroaching where it doesn't need to. Mr. Dahlquist suggested the key to this case is that there is a very clear option that appears to satisfy setbacks and still maintain the access around the garage. 5 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 Mr. Wolden moved to deny. Mr. Kocon seconded the motion. Ms. Seiss asked whether the fact that this is an issue in an older neighborhood and older home makes any difference. Mr. Dahlquist said existing conditions have been a factor, but in this case, this element was not an existing condition and there are alternatives. Motion to deny passed unanimously. It was noted the applicant has 10 days to appeal the decision. Case No. 2011-07. A special use permit for a Minus 5 Ice Box located at 305 Water Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. John Daly, applicant. This case was withdrawn. Mr. Pogge explained that is was determined that a special use permit is not needed as the use is similar to what exists on the patio today. The hearing was opened and closed. Case No. 2011-08. A final plat and final PUD approval for Millbrook 5th Addition for 37 single family homes located at Outlot H Millbrook Addition. US Home Corp, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Pogge reviewed the request and history of the Millbrook PUD. He said the applicant is requesting one revision — to go back to the original lot layout for the area west of Lowell Court and stay with the revised lot layout for the lots east of Lowell Court. He noted the requested change will result in the loss of one lot rather than the loss of the three lots in the July 2009 revised plan. He noted the requested change still has lots that are above the minimum lot size and lot widths for the zoning district; he said staff has no issue with the requested change. He said overall the plans meet all of the conditions for the PUD permit. Mr. Pogge did address a change regarding a trail connection along Highway 96. Originally that was to be part of a state regional trail. However, he said it now appears the regional trail will be aligned with the Zephyr rail line, and the Highway 96 trail connection will likely not be needed. However, he said staff recommends, and the applicant has agreed to provide, a trail easement for the Highway 96 connection should that be needed in the future. He said approval is recommended with the three conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Dahlquist confirmed that the second PUD amendment was not associated with the amendment related to the townhome change and also that this does not change the housing mix. Mr. Pogge noted that staff has done some administrative approvals for houses and the applicant likely will be asking for more; he said staff's primary concern is that what is being requested will not result in smaller homes or garage -dominant housing plans. Mr. Dahlquist opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Wolden, seconded by Ms. Seiss, moved approval as conditioned. Motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS 5.01 Letter from Lee Sather, owner of James Mulvey Inn, 622 Churchill Street West, request to terminate Bed and Breakfast special use permit. Mr. Pogge noted the home is reverting back to single-family use and the lender is requiring the termination of the special use permit. 5.02 Discussion of vendor sales draft ordinance — Mr. Turnblad reviewed the first draft of regulations for seasonal food vending operations, noting that currently there are three food vendors operating in the City. Mr. Wolden asked about the financial implications of going from the special use permit, currently in place, to the annual permit process. Mr. Turnblad said currently a special use permit costs $500, with no annual fee unless a major change is made; he said the fee 6 CITY OF STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION March 14, 2011 for the annual permit will likely be $15 or $20. Mr. Dahlquist noted there has been a concern that seasonal vendors may put permanent businesses at a disadvantage, but noted there will be an opportunity for feedback regarding that issue at the public hearing. Mr. Dahlquist expressed a concern about allowing the vendors to have sandwich board signage. Mr. Turnblad said the proposal is to allow such signage on the subject property, not on public sidewalk; he noted vendors are not allowed on public property. Mr. Dahlquist suggested some clarification in the language as the City does have an ordinance which allows sandwich boards on public property — sidewalks. Mr. Turnblad agreed that the language should specify location on private property only. Mr. Turnblad said the ordinance will be brought back to the Commission for a final review and be shared with member sof the industry prior to scheduling a public hearing. * Mr. Buchanan asked whether variance criteria are set by the state; Mr. Turnblad said that is established both by state statute and case law. There was discussion of cases heard earlier in the evening. Mr. Menikheim spoke of the importance of being a user-friendly City. Mr. Buchanan referred to the Krummenacher case and suggested that it is the duty of Commissioners to take the criteria and interpret them, but not just disregard them if as an individual might disagree with a criteria. Mr. Dahlquist referred to Mr. Menikheim's comments and suggested that should be a decision of the City Council, pointing out the Commission's decisions can be and are appealed to the City Council. Mr. Menikheim suggested it might be good to have a conversation with the Council. Mr. Turnblad stated the Commission has had a good working relationship with the Council for many years, and said it is well understood that the Planning Commission reviews cases from a technical, planning perspective, while the Council has the broader perspective. * Mr. Dahlquist welcomed Matt Gullick to the Commission. Mr. Kocon, seconded by Ms. Seiss, moved to adjourn at 9:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 7 pater THE BIRTHPLACE OF M[ N NE S O TA Planning Report DATE: April 8, 2011 CASE NO.: 2011-10 APPLICANT: Raymond Queener, Assistant Supt. of Business & Administration ISD #834 LAND OWNER: School District #834 REQUEST: 1) Ordinance Amendment to allow Early Childhood Education by SUP in the RB Zoning District 2) Special Use Permit for an Early Childhood Education facility on the Stillwater Jr High School Property in RB Zoning District LOCATION: 523 W Marsh Street (Stillwater Jr High School) HEARING DATE: April 11, 2011 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low/Medium Density Residential ZONING: RB, Two -Family Residential REVIEWED BY: Torry Kraftson, Assistant City Engineer; Mike Pogge, City Planner REPORT BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director BACKGROUND The Stillwater Area Public School District has outgrown its Early Childhood Family Center (ECFC) at 14480 North 60th Street. Therefore the School District Board conducted a search for property that would accommodate the ECFC program growth. Dozens of sites were investigated as potential homes for a new facility. In April of last year the School Board approved a purchase agreement with UFE, Inc. for property across the street from the School District's administrative offices on South Greeley. After approval of the site by the City Council of Stillwater, environmental issues were discovered that made use of the site for young children unattractive. So the School Board selected their next top site, which is the practice soccer field on the Stillwater Junior High School property. The new 45,000 square foot ECFC facility proposed for construction on the site would provide a home for early childhood family education (ECFE) and early childhood special education (ECSE). In addition, about 4,500 square feet of the total area would be leased to Courage EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 2 Center St. Croix and Northeast Metro 916 Intermediate School District. These two collaborative community partnerships help provide services to children with special needs. Northeast Metro 916 works with school children who have hearing disabilities and Courage Center would provide pediatric therapy services at the site. The ECSE classes and programs are mandated by the State for all public schools. They are required to provide classes and services by licensed teachers to any child with a diagnosed disability that affects their learning and development. As explained in the attached memo from Ray Queener, Assistant Superintendent of Business and Administrative Services, ECFE provides classes by licensed teachers to infants, toddlers, preschoolers and their parents. Parents participate in classes about childhood education and resources related to child development. Young children learn from early childhood teachers who specialize in early learning standards. In a typical ECFE class, parents and children attend once a week. They explore and learn together for approximately 45 minutes and then separate (when age -appropriate) for 45 minutes into classes designed specifically for the children and the parents. Approximately 400 children are served in classes or therapy programs each week, with about 85 children and 50 adult participants in the building at any given time. The Junior High School property is zoned RB, Two -Family Residential. In this zoning district "public and private primary and secondary schools" are allowed by Special Use Permit. Though the City Zoning Ordinance does not define either "primary" or "secondary", they are generally understood to mean kindergarten through 12th grade. Early childhood education is for pre -kindergarten aged pupils. Therefore, though the facility is clearly a public school and substantially similar to public schools that are allowed by Special Use Permit, a strict reading would not allow early childhood education. SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to construct the ECFC facility on the Jr. High property, the Stillwater Area School District has requested: 1) An ordinance amendment to allow early childhood education by Special Use Permit in the RB zoning district; and 2) A Special Use Permit for early childhood education, should the amendment be adopted by the City Council. EVALUATION OF REQUEST I. Ordinance Amendment As mentioned, early childhood education is not specifically allowed in the RB zoning district, though by Special Use Permit "primary and secondary" schools are allowed. Since early childhood education is substantially similar in many ways to a primary school, the amendment request seems reasonable. EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 3 "Early childhood education" would include both "early childhood family education" and "early childhood special education" as defined by the State. It would NOT include commercial daycare. Planning Commissioners will remember that the ECFC plan for the UFE site had included a commercial child care component. Commercial child care was allowed on the UFE site because it was not zoned residentially. However, on the residentially zoned Jr. High site commercial child care is not allowed. Consequently, the School Board has removed that from the new facility. II. Special Use Permit The City zoning ordinance refers to principal uses as either permitted in a zoning district or not permitted in that district. In addition, some principal uses may be compatible with the permitted uses in a given district if the impact of their use is found acceptable or can be controlled. The zoning ordinance refers to this class of uses as allowed by Conditional or Special Use Permit. In the RB zoning district (if the applicant's request for an ordinance amendment is approved), early childhood education would be allowed with a Special Use Permit. City Code Ch. 31, Sec 31-207 (d) establishes guidelines for reviewing requests for Special Use Permits. They are: (1) The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of the zoning ordinance, the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations. Both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance find it acceptable to locate schools within residential neighborhoods. (2) Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed. This guideline is addressed below through a variety of review standards. (3) The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. The two issues that have generated the most neighborhood discussion under this guideline are parking and traffic. Parking - One of the advantages of this site for the School District is that there is considerable excess parking on the property and it is in a configuration and situation that would be convenient and safe for the ECFC building. Daytime parking - During the day, there will be ample parking for the simultaneous needs of both the ECFC and SJHS buildings. The Jr. High has 63 classrooms and the parking requirement for a Jr High is 3 parking spaces per classroom. So the minimum number of required spaces for the Jr High is EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 4 189. The three existing parking fields (south of the Jr High and north of the Jr High) have a total of 399 spaces. That leaves 210 excess spaces. The ECFC will need a maximum of 146 spaces during the day. There is no specific parking requirement in the zoning ordinance for early childhood education. The closest comparable is parking for elementary and jr. high schools, which is 3 spaces per classroom. There are 18 classrooms, so under this comparable requirement only 54 spaces would be necessary. The 146 number is a projection based upon experience with the existing ECFC facility. The new facility would have at any one time a maximum of 48 staff members in the building and 50 parents. In addition there will be a need for peaking when there is turnover. So both the Jr. High and ECFC would have a simultaneous combined need for as many as 335 spaces. There are 399 available. This leaves an excess of 64 spaces. Nighttime parking - Unlike daytime use of the property, evening use may not always have sufficient parking. On occasion the Jr. High will have an evening concert or athletic event (sometimes it even schedules two events on the same evening — for example a concert and a swim meet). A double event or even a single very large event has the potential to generate more parking demand than can be satisfied on the school property. VVhen this occurs, parking spreads out onto neighborhood streets. If the ECFC building were also used during these heavy parking demand periods the parking situation would become more difficult. Nearly all of the ECFE classes take place during the day. In the current location there is one class running on Monday nights, one on Thursday nights, and occasional other evening meetings for parents during the month. Any night that there is a class or a parent meeting scheduled, there could be up to 15 cars parked. In addition the Courage Center has late afternoon and evening therapy appointments, which would represent about 4 therapists working individually zvith children - so there could be as many as 6- 8 cars at a time, including staff. Therefore, on any given evening there could be a need for a maximum of 23 spaces. ECFC has the flexibility to ensure that none of their larger events or meetings (creating a larger demand than the standard 23 cars mentioned above) would be scheduled when there is a public event at SJHS. The School District is also putting further plans in place to ensure that even the Junior High itself is planning more carefully with the high school athletics office, who schedules the swim meets into the pool. This careful planning would greatly reduce the number of nights when two major events get scheduled at the SJHS. To mitigate the worst case parking scenarios the Planning Commission should consider recommending a condition in the Special Use Permit that prohibits scheduling either: a) two major events at the Jr. High School at the same time; or b) a larger event at the ECFC when a major event is scheduled at the SJHS. Traffic — SRF Consulting Group, Inc. completed an analysis of the impact that the ECFC would have upon the streets in the neighborhood. That study is attached. Its EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 5 conclusion is that all streets and intersections would be able to accommodate the additional traffic and that the internal circulation design is good. • The report identifies a potential turn radius problem for east bound parents trying to turn into the ECFC drop off lane. This potential problem has been addressed by moving the existing northwest access to the parking lot southward. Now eastbound traffic will flow to the east side of the parking lot and circle back to get a better approach to the ECFC drop off lane. • Since parents and their children will park in the lot and walk across the traffic aisle on the north side of the lot, marked pedestrian crossings should be provided. • The ECFC and Jr. High School hourly traffic profiles indicate that there would be minimal overlap of peak hour traffic volumes. ECFC generated traffic will enter and exit the site more consistently throughout the day versus the higher morning and afternoon traffic peaks associated with the Jr. High School. • The report concludes by saying the proposed ECFC generated traffic would not result in a significant traffic volume increase on any of the neighborhood roadways or City collector streets. No increases would be experienced greater than 15 percent with most increases less than 10 percent. Therefore, the proposed ECFC would not represent a significant adverse traffic impact. The City's Public Works Director agrees with this conclusion. MISCELLANEOUS REVIEW STANDARDS Building design The exterior materials for the ECFC building have not been submitted for review yet. This was intentional to allow input from neighbors during the neighborhood meeting. Prior to final approval by the City Council, colored renderings of elevations with materials will need to be submitted. Landscaping Kathy Widin, the City's forestry consultant, reviewed the landscaping plans. Her comments are reproduced here. 1. Eight existing trees along the east side of Holcombe St. are indicated to be relocated. This will not be possible since the trees are too large to move successfully, even with a large tree spade. Six of the trees are ash and should not be retained due to the presence in Minnesota of a serious insect pest, emerald ash borer. Therefore, she recommends that these trees be removed and new trees, of several different native species, be planted to replace them. 2. On the east side of the proposed ECFC building is a long hedge of lilacs. Beyond the hedge, on private property, are a large silver maple and a multi -stem birch. Care should be taken in this area to prevent damage to the hedge and the root systems of the trees on private property. The plan C5 indicates that "tree save areas" will be enclosed with orange tree protection fencing and signed throughout the project. This fencing should be placed outside EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 6 the branch spread of the lilac hedge to prevent damage to the above -ground portions as well as the root systems of the hedge and the trees on the adjoining property. The fencing should be up prior to the beginning of construction and remain until all construction has been completed. All grading and soil disturbance should stay outside the branch spread of the lilac hedge. 3. The landscape plan for the facility is minimal and consists only of two types of trees. The building site would benefit from foundation plantings; however, even if those are not included, more tree species should be added to the landscape plan to improve diversity. The forestry consultant recommends at least one other evergreen species, such as "Black Hills" white spruce, to be interspersed with the white pine. Perhaps a few red pine as well. Since the large trees on the east frontage of Holcombe St. cannot be relocated successfully, there are now a total of 14 deciduous trees as part of the landscaping which should include 4 different types of shade or ornamental trees. A few "Autumn Blaze" maples would be fine, but increase diversity by adding several oaks (northern red, northern pin or bicolor), a few American linden (basswood or improved cultivar such as "Redmond"), thornless honeylocust, disease resistant flowering crabs or river birch. With greater diversity of plant materials, the landscape has a better chance of doing well longer since it will have more resistance to problems with site issues, insects or diseases. 4. The planting detail only includes deciduous B&B planting stock. The planting detail should include the instructions: "before back -filling, remove the top of the burlap covering the root ball; remove twine from the bottom of the trunk; remove the top rungs of wire baskets, if around the root ball". 5. There is a bio retention basin shown on some of the plan sheets, though not on the landscape plan. Sod is indicated to be planted around the edge of the basin. The forestry consultant suggests considering native grasses and wildflowers, as part of the bio retention basin. Civil engineering The Public Works Department reviewed the civil engineering plans and makes the following comments. • The street restoration section shall be 4 inches of bituminous placed in 2 lifts. Pavement restoration for utility connections at the intersection of Holcombe Street and Hancock Street shall be a continuous patch extending north to the north end of the excavation for sewer connection, east to the east end of the excavation for water connection and south to the south radius line of Holcombe Street. New accessible ramps with truncated domes shall be installed on the north and south crossing of Hancock Street. • Concrete curb along West Hancock Street shall be B618. • The sewer service shall connect to the existing Junior High service which comes from the track and field building, rather than directly into the manhole. • Basin #3 at the northwest corner shows a contour with a raised elevation of 906. This contour should be a 904 elevation. To the left of the basin #1 label, the top of curb is labeled 1 foot too high (TC 904.76, GL 903.43). EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 7 • There are proposed white pine trees shown along the north side of basin #3. Two of the proposed trees are shown near the bottom of the infiltration basin. The tree locations shall be adjusted to a location where they will not be adversely affected by the hydrology of the adjacent infiltration basin. • Final drainage calculations will need to be submitted along with a completed Middle Saint Croix Watershed Management Organization application. The drainage calculations shall indicate no increase in runoff from the 2,10, and 100-year storm events. This appears to be the intention based on the design of the 3 drainage basins. Some drainage calculations have been submitted, but additional drainage information is needed. Additional required submittals are a drainage boundary map, a calculation summary sheet, and inclusion of 23,000 square feet of proposed drainage area (existing drainage area is greater than proposed drainage area). These additional drainage materials are required prior to final approval. • Prior to construction, an NPDES permit must be obtained from the MPCA. Certificate of Survey There is a bit of confusion over the location of the shared property line between the school property and the rear yards of the four homes on Hancock Street. The confusion arises from an assumption that the right-of-way for Hancock Street is 60 feet wide. Between Holcombe Street and 5th Street it is actually less than 30 feet wide. Since the legal descriptions for the four homes on Hancock describe the depth of the lots as 200 feet from the southerly right-of- way line of Hancock, the assumed extra 30 feet of right-of-way would push the rear lot line of these homes 30 feet into school property. This situation can be seen in the attached air photo. The photo shows the assumed right-of-way line and assumed property lines in black. The actual right-of-way and property lines are in red. The result is that if the School District builds the ECFC's playground and row of buffer trees along its northern edge as proposed, the neighbors will lose areas that they have been maintaining for years as their rear yards. Though the School District may have the legal right to use their property this way, it may be worth considering moving the playground 10 to 15 feet further south and not changing the current residential usage pattern. ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has several alternatives. A. Approval. If the proposed school and its associated requests are found to be acceptable to the Planning Commission, it should recommend that the City Council approve the Special Use Permit and ordinance amendment with the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the Planning Department except as may be modified by the conditions herein: • Overall Site Plan dated March 22, 2011 • Enlarged Site Plan dated March 22, 2011 • Views dated March 22, 2011 • Demolition Plan C1 dated March 22, 2011 EFCE April 8, 2011 Page 8 • Paving and Dimension Plan C2 dated March 22, 2011 • Grading And Erosion Control Plan C3 dated March 22, 2011 • Utility Plan C4 dated March 22, 2011 • Landscape Plan C5 dated March 22, 2011 2. Civil engineering plans shall be revised and found satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to commencing grading or excavation for the project. 3. The landscaping plans shall be revised and resubmitted prior to City Council action on the Special Use Permit. 4. Colored renderings of the proposed building's exterior elevations shall be submitted prior to City Council action on the Special Use Permit. 5. Marked pedestrian crossings found satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be provided to allow parents and children to safely cross from the parking lot to the ECFC entrance. Their location shall be included on revised site plans prior to City Council action on the Special Use Permit. 6. To mitigate the worst case parking scenarios on the site, the School District shall avoid scheduling: a) two simultaneous major events at the Stillwater Jr. High School; and b) a larger event at the ECFC building when a major event is scheduled at the Stillwater Jr. High School. B. Table If the Planning Commission believes that additional information is necessary to formulate a recommendation on the requests, it could table the application until May 9, 2011. C. Denial If the Planning Commission finds that the proposal is not advisable, it could recommend denial of the requests. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative A. attachments: Zoning and Location Map Air photo of neighborhood Overall site plan Enlarged site plan Views of building massing Civil engineering plans Landscape plan Traffic Study Boundary line graphic i EEr- t 1.-uPC Proposed ECFC Site - i4eTBRL4 ^dBNRY r tfw Stillwater Jr. High School �, r fi INL rl 3 —_y INN — MENNE .1.121111111 ECFC Proposal Zoning & Location Zoning Districts zoning ( ( A-P. Agricultural Preservation RA Sincje Family Residential RB. Two Family Residential TR, Traddional Residential LR, Lakeshore Residential CR. Cottage Residential TH, Townhouse CTR. Cove Traditional Residential - CCR. Cove Cottage Residential I 1 RCM, Medium Density Residential RCH, High Density Residential VC, Village Commercial CA General Commercial CBD, Central Business District BP-C, Business Park- Commercial - BP-O. Business Park- Office PA Public Administration CRD. Campus Research Development BP -I. Business Park - Industrial IB, Heavy Industrial PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space ( PWF. Public Works Facility Road R-O-W Railroad Open Water - -AltkrE s TONI Consulting Group, Inc. E NCINEERS PLANNERS D [SIGNERS SRF No. 0117356 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Gregory A. Buchal, P.E., Project Manager LARSON ENGINEERING INC. Early Childhood Family Center, Project Management Team STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS — DISTRICT 834 FROM: John Hagen, PE, PTOE, Senior Associate Jeff Bednar, TOPS, Senior Traffic Engineering Specialist DATE: February 7, 2010 SUBJECT: EARLY CHILDHOOD FAMILY CENTER — STILLWATER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY INTRODUCTION As requested, we have completed a traffic impact study for the proposed Early Childhood Family Center (ECFC) co -located on the Stillwater Junior High School Site in the City of Stillwater, Minnesota. The junior high school campus site is located north of Orleans Street and west of 6th Street (see Figure 1: Study Area Project Location Map). We understand that the purpose of this traffic impact study is to address the following issues and concerns: • ECFC site generated faculty, student drop off/pick up, visitor and school bus traffic levels, and the distribution of ECFC generated traffic on the supporting roadways once the ECFC is co -located on the Stillwater Junior High School site. • Possible residential neighborhood traffic impacts related to the ECFC generated traffic on the supporting roadways and possible traffic impact mitigation strategies. EXISTING CONDITIONS Morning and afternoon peak period (7:00 to 9:00 AM and 2:00 to 4:00 PM) turning movement counts were collected by Larson Engineering Inc. staff at selected study area intersections on Tuesday, January 25th, 2011. Based on these traffic counts the junior high school related peak hours begin at 7:15 AM and 2:15 PM. Existing roadway and intersection geometrics and traffic control were verified based on recent aerial and street view photography. www.srfconsulting.com One Carlson Parkway North, Suite -150 Minneapolis, MN 55447-4443 1763.475.IXY10 Fax: 763.475.2429 An Equal Opportunity Employer E O T A • N G T O ✓Lke. '.�.�LSi Lakevlow ... Lily WoapEtal Lake j" s Recroat{ n Area IR:4 I Study Area Project Location Map Consulting Group, Inr. Proposed Early Childhood Family Center — Stillwater Junior High School Site — Traffic Impact Study 0117356 February 2011 Larson Engineering Inc./Stillwater Area Public Schools District 834 Figure 1 Gregory A. Buchal, P.E. - 3 - February 7, 2011 ECFC, Project Management Team The existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes presented in this traffic impact study are estimates based on the City of Stillwater 2009 Traffic Flow Map, the previous study (2008) of the junior high school bus related site improvements and the morning and afternoon peak period turning movement counts collected at selected study area intersections as part of this study. PROPOSED STILLWATER EARLY CHILDHOOD FAMILY CENTER The new Early Childhood Family Center (ECFC) is proposed to be co -located on the existing Stillwater Junior High School Site (see Figure 2: Existing Site Aerial Photograph). As shown in Figure 3, the proposed ECFC concept site plan is well configured in terms of traffic circulation, and provides good access to the supporting transportation system. The plan takes advantage of existing parking on the Stillwater Junior High School site and provides adequate space for ECFC play areas. The plan also results in locating the proposed ECFC close to an elementary school which may allow integration of other school programs. Based on information provided by the school district, most ECFC clients/students (65 percent) will arrive by passenger vehicle, half of which will be dropped-off/picked-up by parents or guardians with the other half being accompanied by their parents or guardians for the length of their visit. The remaining clients/students (35 percent) will arrive by bus. The drop-off/pick-up area is proposed at the main building entrance and appears to operate as a one-way westbound roadway on the south side of the proposed ECFC building. There appears to be a service access on the north side of the proposed ECFC building on Hancock Street. As passenger vehicles approach this one-way westbound entrance to the drop-off/pick-up from both directions it is recommended that the passenger vehicle turning radius be checked for an eastbound left -turn from the main circulation roadway to the westbound drop-off/pick-up roadway. On -site drop-off/pick-up area guide signing should be considered to ensure clients/students are dropped-off/picked-up on the site and not in the adjacent neighborhoods. A review of the ECFC and junior high school hourly traffic profiles indicates that there would be minimal overlap of peak hour traffic volumes. The ECFC morning peak hour begins at 8:30 AM with traffic entering and exiting the site more consistently throughout the day with the afternoon peak hour beginning at 3:00 PM. According to information provided, there would be minimal programs that run into the late afternoon or early evening hours. Parking for the proposed ECFC will take advantage of existing parking for the junior high school. ECFC clients/students and/or their parents or guardians who park at the ECFC will access the building as pedestrians by crossing the main east/west roadway serving the junior high school and ECFC and the one-way drop-off/pick-up roadway near the building's main entrance. Marked and signed pedestrian crosswalks should be considered at these two crossing locations. _, Churchill Street Anderson Street ECFC Stillwater Junior High School 6 ''`5 Hancock Street Orleans Street Marsh Street Consulting Group, Ini 0117356 February 2011 Existing Site Aerial Photograph Figure 2 Early Childhood Family Center — Stillwater Junior High School Larson Engineering Inc./Stillwater Area Public Schools District 834 \Projects\7356\TS\Figures\Figure3 Hancock Street B ■7 R K .4'>Lr311-r r. rti Option 1 1 Stnry Building 45,600 $F Purim Analysis' Emend' 1911161.1 Slogs N4 RBI' ,$ Pi 1 /17 Req. P t Ec C: 1Od Oise Foiling. 390.113.1Ab..61 Wills u, OALY a%- t-a33 krwlball Pal awl 1•Ixtli INNRMN1l'1 ECFC Stillwater Junior High Slta Studla: Deompr*i 26. 2C tf1 1:1 E4 I Proposed Stillwater ECFC Concept Site Plan Figure 3 Consulting Group, '[IL Proposed Early Childhood Family Center — Stillwater Junior High School Site — Traffic Impact Study 0117356 February 2011 Larson Engineering Inc./Stillwater Area Public Schools District 834 Gregory A. Buchal, P.E. - 6 - February 7, 2011 ECFC, Project Management Team TRAFFIC FORECASTS Based on information provided by the ECFC staff, trip generation estimates for the proposed ECFC were developed. The proposed ECFC will generate approximately 490 trips (with 245 inbound and 245 outbound) on an average weekday. For comparison purposes, a trip generation estimate for the proposed ECFC was developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 2008 "Trip Generation" Report. Since the ITE "Trip Generation" Report does not contain data for early childhood family centers, trip generation rates for Day Care/Pre-School facilities were used. The resultant ITE trip generation estimate for the proposed ECFC site is 448 trips on an average weekday. Based on this comparison, the ECFC client/student and faculty/staff based trip generation estimate of 490 daily trips was considered reasonable and was the basis for the ECFC traffic volume projections. Based on information provided by the ECFC staff, it is estimated that three (3) trucks will serve the proposed ECFC on an average weekday. These trucks would include a daily USPS mail delivery truck and two of the following possible trucks: UPS/FedEx, solid waste disposal, food service, school supply and maintenance trucks. Many of these trucks may already be on the study area roadways on a daily basis and would not be new trucks in the neighborhood. Based on ECFC staff information, special events will occasionally occur, but not frequently enough to include in the average weekday daily trip generation estimate. There are also existing trips generated by the existing site (which is now an athletic field). However, because this existing site traffic is seasonal and not a daily occurrence it was determined that a trip reduction to the ECFC design weekday trip generation estimate was not required. The 490 ECFC generated daily trips were assigned to the existing study area roadways based on an assumed directional trip distribution (see Figure 4: Proposed Stillwater ECFC Site Generated Traffic Directional Trip Distribution). This ECFC site generated traffic directional trip distribution was based on information related to the geographic distribution of the proposed ECFC client/student and faculty/staff population provided by the ECFC staff. The resulting traffic projections are shown on Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, the proposed ECFC generated traffic would not result in a significant traffic volume increase on any of the selected study area roadways (no increases greater than 15 percent with most increases less than 10 percent) when ECFC generated traffic is added to the existing study area selected roadway daily traffic volumes. The following are selected examples of the estimated daily traffic volume increases on study area roadways: • Churchill Street west of Holcombe Street: + 275 vehicle trips per day (3.5 percent) • Holcombe Street south of Churchill Street: + 200 vehicle trips per day (6.5 percent) • 6th Street south of Churchill Street: + 105 vehicle trips per day (5.3 percent) • Hancock Street west of 6th Street: + 30 vehicle trips per day (13.6 percent) • Hancock Street east of 6th Street: + 60 vehicle trips per day (14.0 percent) Based on these estimated daily traffic volume increases, and since the majority of these new trips will be scattered throughout an average weekday between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM, it is concluded that the proposed ECFC would not represent a significant traffic impact on the study area neighborhood roadways. Lake. Northland Park Lakeview,. — Lily Hospital ' a' Lake ■ .. a Recreation Stillyvatbr Fairview Jurtior,E'igh CernPI School •r 'a Hou°ton,; Note: 5% of the Proposed ECFC site generated traffic directional trip distribution (not shown) is distributed to the surrounding neighborhood streets. gProposed Stillwater ECFC Site Generated Traffic Generalized Directional Trip Distribution 0117356 February 2011 Proposed Early Childhood Family Center — Stillwater Junior High School Site — Traffic Impact Study Larson Engineering Inc./Stillwater Area Public Schools District 834 Figure 4 :\Pro'ects\7356\T \Fi.ures\Fi.ure Daily Traffic Volume Legend Existing = X,XXX Projected = (X,XXX) `, 1 Study Area Daily Traffic Volumes - Existing and Projected Figure 5 Consulting Group, Inc Proposed Early Childhood Family Center — Stillwater Junior High School Site — Traffic Impact Study g 0117356 February 2011 Larson Engineering Inc./Stillwater Area Public Schools District 834 Gregory A. Buchal, P.E. - 9 - February 7, 2011 ECFC, Project Management Team CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of this Early Childhood Family Center (ECFC) traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are offered for consideration: • The proposed ECFC concept site plan is well configured in terms of traffic circulation and provides good access to the supporting transportation system. • The proposed drop-off/pick-up area at the main building entrance operates as a one-way westbound roadway on the south side of the proposed ECFC building. As passenger vehicles may approach the entrance to this one-way westbound drop-off/pick-up from both directions it is recommended that the passenger vehicle turning radius be checked for an eastbound left - turn from the main circulation roadway to the westbound drop-off/pick-up roadway. It is also recommended that on -site drop-off/pick-up area guide signing be considered to ensure clients/students are dropped-off/picked-up on the site and not in the adjacent neighborhoods. • Parking for the proposed ECFC will take advantage of existing parking available on the junior high school site south of the proposed ECFC building. ECFC clients/students escorted by their parents or guardians who park at the ECFC will access the building as pedestrians by crossing the main east/west roadway serving the junior high school, the ECFC and the one- way drop-off/pick-up roadway near the building's main entrance. It is recommended that marked and signed pedestrian crosswalks be considered at these two crossing locations. • The proposed ECFC site would generate approximately 490 trips on an average weekday. This estimate compares conservatively with an estimate based on the ITE "Trip Generation" Report. • The ECFC and junior high school hourly traffic profiles indicate that there would be minimal overlap of peak hour traffic volumes. ECFC generated traffic will enter and exit the site more consistently throughout the day versus the higher morning and afternoon traffic peaks associated with the junior high school. • The number of trucks serving the proposed ECFC is estimated to be three (3) on an average weekday, with many of these trucks already on the study area roadways on a daily basis. • The proposed ECFC generated traffic would not result in a significant traffic volume increase on any of the selected study area roadways (no increases greater than 15 percent with most increases less than 10 percent). Therefore; the proposed ECFC would not represent a significant adverse traffic impact on the study area neighborhood roadways. H: IProjects173561TSIReportslECFCFinal Traffic Memo.docx Case 2011-10 Stillwater Area Public School District - Early Childhood Education Facility N A 0 125 250 1 inch = 250 feet Location of ECEF Building City of Stillwater, MN I Feet Community Development Department 500 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 — 651-430-8810 fax A -- Miller Field Track Football Practice 1 Football Practice 2 I Football I I iBaseball Field 3 I I I NORTH 0 65' 130' 260' Baseball Field Practice 3 . \ Baseball Field 1, Baseball Fie" -Srout1fl eSt -Parking _Lo 11 11 1! tl II II Tennis Courts 1 • 11 n u 11 ' • 011, i it v!;,' WEST 1 _ F ++++� td !-1- I� -i-i-r +-* ++ -1� -T.4 1 I I I I I ITTaJ 1 1 i 1.1--1,!, i i ``! � i ``�'�y�1t4'f fyFILTRAT ,f 11 Northeast !�'\Ii�, i` F it+Th`fi t•kt, LE 1�: 1 ii\li �.� „1,IIkingLot�li r�,i " i�i �yfill ilia t- i11— ��{"id u HANCOCK STREET L 15016-40.1r- i L H I Stillwater Junior High School South--Parking-Bat, INT Mak .9, «. /1 a IMFCT API FePc cToc43- CC N 1 `wl sr _MARSH STI STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Stillwater Early Childhood Family Center Overall Site Plan March 22, 2011 BWBR ARCHITECTS EX CP FNa t= 8 -2.`3. 31 tN V = 821 7,3 Ely Childhood Fa -Center Project Extents NORTH 0 30' 6 120' ('.1 ' 35' 0" 280.20 Classrooms RN- NNE Cla; srooms Physical Act. Lobby Cla isrooms Classrooms Classy • oms SHRUBS 30'-0" • Property Line (Bold Phantom ine) 10 Setback + (Thin Phantom }l ink 5'-0" Roof Overhang (Dash Line) Recessed Lighting under Overhang (Dot) aMINIM a•IiitIla S89'51'01"W 385.80 ^4+ 2.87 V V EX Riq G� 7 r4s //I F. _ RiF '7 — 22 RN9O 3 !NV: 897.80 \-,L -� Ely Childho6d FfinilyCenter Project Extents/ / ogO zze./7 1� cF %1 a /� / / i °q 1 34 LE17ff4,CP @ 0.055 - '4 z, �r' 25 LF Rt;P/4 t.57/ / i / OUTLET }1}� V STRUCTURE-2 1 ( / RNM:898.r ,.•. NV: 89 -99 , I �'C I Rik 901.21 _ 155898.50 _� !NV:fi9840(59) 90r� o RFCIRRTED DRAM !LE 0 0.7% :N` t '�� ..897. 01 715"k �� l/ -�'r, _ 1 _ 1 r-a>� I 1 1 ;; _ T t 1 1 i 1 ^1.� •,. 2 € t2' 901 i ' v,� 1 I i i I i ; �'t-- 1 1 ILLL L - -O�jQ -._ _ - y-Ch11d oQd.;Faln11y Center _ �/ % %/ 699 898 Project Exte ,� - I 1 I 1 1- 1 1 I i �F i i 1 1 f Existing Northeaast-PArking Lot : 1 1 I 2 I Q LJ 'iI L1 "ate I i -- ! 1 1 1 1 I 1 I , 1 l 1 i i i i 1 1 CB-5 RN: 908.00 • r • 900 597.30 1 \ \\\\ I \ INFILTRATION , I t y l BASIN /,,, 9 ,61 ENTATK am`, 01 01f`4= FES-1-9C3 962 -9oN NV' 904 00 4 904 -905 —907 908 STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Stillwater Early Childhood Family Center Enlarged Site Plan March 22, 2011 BWBR ARCHITECTS 'Northwest View (Aerial west iV ewfeet Level) Southwest View (Street Level) Southeast View (Street Level) STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Stillwater Early Childhood Family Center Views March 22, 2011 BWBR ARCHITECTS 414r- c 5 a.* •- ,61:414, ,..M.4111111 NUMB .17.,1 .‘• j-.c7.9-7,%77-7--- 4 South View STILLWATER AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Stillwater Early Childhood Family Center Views March 22, 2011 BWBR ARCHITECTS w cci 1 G • I_ O w U w — J Ce O I— = til -r J_ _L _L POSED 1/7 RON PPE PINZKED 'STACK. AT PERFECTED PLAT CORNER 0.5 \VEST AND 0.4SOUTH ,-Y Of TRUE I/16TH SORNER ",;(2,•'•." 111 00 : cr i I LLJ 10. 1 , I I— LI.J .; I I :'.. '; F— O _iii v) ,o, •: i ----242 CORNER OF TPE NV/ 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF TEE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 33 ,E] — I-- ROADWAY isrT —1 EASEMENTv00C 857551 26, ---'1 1 r_ L 0 L 1 mts, WEST ''gm TvH4LNEc,. iNW/4 :Fec 131 58951 01 W 280.20 It 1 SOUTH LINE OF WEST N \ HANCOCK STREET PER RICHT OF WAY ''11 EASEMNT PER BOCK 122. PAE 1134 as Z: _J u DASFED LK•S ARE roe:oversews PER CONSTRUCTION PLANS Kan LARSEN EN0EEER1N6. HANCOCK 41 1.29" DESCRIPTION OVERLAP WON ADJOKERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0.78" DeSORPNON OVERLAP WITH ADJOINERS LEGAL f DESCRPTION F01.20 1/7' RON PIPE MARKEO ANEZ AT ADJOK/NG PARCEL CORNER SHRUBS 666 10 589.3449-E 100.00 DESC r• X F',;,` !6•9 4,2 r. e,01 4,4 O a A 450 4,1 g K• FOUND I/O' RON PPE MARKED ANEZ ON --, PARCEL LNE x , 114 DASHED LNES ARE KPROVVENTS PER CONSTRUCTION PLANS FROM LARSEN ENGNEERING'. 100.00 DESC ,se 0.0.3 DESORPTION CAP WITH AOJOKERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALONG LNE 0 T STREET 121. OC,4," `A, RICHT OF WAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 02. PAE 64 19.85 ---------- 4° LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LNE OF WEST HANCOCK STRET PER RIGHT OF ,--WAY EASEMENT PER BOOK 122, PAE 64 % S89'51.01"W 385.80 385.80 T OL#40 I/2. RON PPE CHAN LNK FENCE MARKED ANEZ ON PARCEL LINE ]-•••---2-WOOD WALL 7;-/-74 SCHOOL DISTRICT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Property Report by Land Title, Inc (File Number 355665, dated January 19, 2011) was relied upon for matter of record. (Legal Description Per Book 182 of Deeds, Page 407) All that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 33, and running North on the West line of South 6th Street a distance of 439.87 feet to an Iron pipe, thence West parallel to the South line of West Hancock Street a distance of 385.8 feet to an Iron pipe thence North Parallel to the West line of South 6th Street, a distance of 200.00 to the South line of West line of Hancock Street, thence West on the South line of West Hancock Street, a distance of 280.2 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, thence South on the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, a distance of 632.81 feet to the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, thence East on the South of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, to the point of beginning. 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES: THE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAKES REFERENCE TO 'IRON PIPE' CALLS IN TWO SEPARATE LOCATIONS. IRON PIPES WERE FOUND THAT WERE SET BYJOEL ANEZ, LAND SURVEYOR, ON JANUARY 25TH, 2003. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG/ Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 <> SURVEY NOTES: THIS IS A PARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE NORTH UNE OF THE DESCRIBED SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY AS SHOWN. FIELDWORK WAS PERFORMED JANUARY 12TH, 2011. THE LOCATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS COMPLETED IN 2006 THRU 2008 BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC DASHED UNES FOR IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN FROM CONSTRUCTION PLANS FROM LARSEN ENGINEERING AND HAVE NOT BEEN FIELD VERIFIED. THE FENCE UNE AS SHOWN LS AN ENCROACHMENT. THE CURB UNE ON WEST HANCOCK STREET IS A MINIMAL ENCROACHMENT. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. I I 140,4 'WI 'lir' I 21 ID 16 41 FOLIAR 1/2. IRON PPE MARKED ANEZ ON PARCEL LINE • FOUND I/2' PON PRE • MARKED ANEZ 0.7 P'IAAR"OE6L C°0I2J ----------- (.." ------- &`.• t688 ss:s 26.5—‹ DASHED LNES ARE IMPROVEMENTS PER CONSTRUCTION PLANS FROM LARSEN ENGINEERNG. ,o VICINITY MAP: W PINE ST HANCOCK ST • MARSH ST V/ ORLEANS ST 19'1E1 36 LEGEND: 183 0 .5/ • ;• -* p 45 83 FOUND P.K. NAL • r- 10 42 511 42 5- 01 WATERMAIN 10 DENOTES MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS 25718 DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT AS MARKED WATER VALVES HYDRANT CATCH BASIN/STORM MH SANITARY MANHOLE 0 30 60 SIGN • UTIUTY POLE o LIGHT POLE • WATER UNE —SANITARY SEWER LINE FENCE — CURB CONCRETE 1 NORTH STI LLWATER JR.HIGH SCHOOL STILLWATER, MINNESOTA CONTACT: MIKE MURPHY LARSON ENGINEERING 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110-5100 Phone: (651) 481-9120 COUNTY: vv.e.s 3-1 urcr) 41= 4=0 -T-- SEAL: THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEAL REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 1-19-11 BOUNDARY SURVEY *CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me. or under my direa supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of age state of MINNESOTA. Daniel L. Thurmes Regiobatlon No: 25718 Date:1-12"n PROJECT LOCATION: MARSH STREET WEST Sufte #B100 200 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 Can© cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC FILE NAME PROJECT NO. SURVLE26C-BOUND LE006026C BOUNDARY SURVEY SYMBOL LEGEND REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECRON DEMOLITION NOTES 0 SAWCUT, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND DISPOSE OF DUSTING BITUMINOLG PAVEMENT SECTION. 0 SAwCUT, REMOVE. AND DISPOSE OF EXSTNG CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION O REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING FENCE FABRIC. POSTS, ANO FOOTINGS. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORM SEWER PIPE © REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING TREES. SEE SIEET05. 411 NORTH Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 651 3713701 G� Larson D Engineering, Inc. 2524 Lahore Road White Sear Lake, MN 55110 851.481.9120 (2) 851.481.9201 m toclaraonenpr.oam i er,aayrrr. era®,uwe mseaz4 Ano• duly Samml Siproor en. OW b. of Mee. of NonoWs. MNrI A. Mama, PE Due 0022.11 M,y Nn a]SM 1® - nit beam mvwa Rolueed Crq. TIe par stows l• M0a on a BIM Sze Waft Denw. Sorts 1Pr N FN Sin &new Dom KSK •mmN [Bucked 3.203909.00 Mon Tit DEMOLITION PLAN Cl Copyright BWBR Archec=M 13 (MSC A..5.) WEST S8 r M 280 280.20 NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) : nC NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP I� PROPOSED BUILDING NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYPICAL) ^L Jslri l~/1 666.10 HANCOCK °°°°` STREET � I NEW PLAYGROUND SHRUBS E L NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 289.5r'or8 a-385.80 " .000 WALL e LIGHT -DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION t 12 TAPER ENOS 1T. —.- BOTH SIDES BACKFBL WITH NEW GOOD QUALITY TOPSOIL AND SOD PLAN 4 SECTION A -A EXISTING SUBGRIGE SOIL CURB CUT DETAIL NOT 10 SCALE NOT TO SCALE NEWS BASE AGGREGATE SYMBOL LEGEND NEW S BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OVER NEW r CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE NEW 4-CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER NEW S CRUDEO AGGREGATE BASE WIERE APPLICABLE, DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB DR BACK OF CURB TO ENO OF STALL LINE NEW O. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 4§ i�tf -71 tC Y �fi T:`•4+i-r` .011477a.rdr .0bl�:i ,i��iblLY is i, yM i 5 { iv EXISTING SUB*PAOE SOIL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL BACKFILL WITH NEW GOOD QUALITY T0P801 AND SOD r "li:�� II t i 1-1 I 1T , • 13S r NOT TO SCALE TR SLOPE % PER FT NEWS BASE AGGREGATE NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING SLSORAOE SOIL B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL BACIWILL WITH NEW F000QUAL07 TOPSOIL AND SEED NEW BASE AGGREGATE r Ir —r- 1T NOr To SCALE 1T SLOPE 55 PER FT. NEW BASE AGGREGATE NEWBTUNINOUS PAVEMENT EXISTING 91Neri0r0 SOIL SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL c2 NOT TO SCALE ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAIL WITH TRUNCATED DOMES Nor D SCALE 1.125 NEW CLASS BASE AGGREGATE NORTH 0 15 30 BB Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Common 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 651.2223701 f.,,nmlam ,5 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labors Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 651487.9120 p) 851.481.9201 W W W.IarawlMgmn IA.N A..:aeA.maw� ...r.r �. M1r Rama �a.RE of toe. et Lama Maisel A. W A ., P. IA.. Fat 1um Due 111111111111111111111111 This e.H alr a• w Dw. Tam. Nam f bne a a F:. an Rues Om*. 6'oM op* bF:A Sia She.. Due Oven eSZN1 Ke, Cnota. N.. rxaw aamennm NAM Shen role PAVING AND DIMENSION PLAN C2 Copyright S\TBRMhitects WIRE MESH RFJNFORCEMENT (OPTIONAL) METAL. WOOD POST OR STAKE. SMAX SPACING, 2 INTO GROIN. NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH )HOG FLAGS. STEEL POSTS WITH WIRES OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES. SILTATION FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL NOT TO SALE ' OiP WA i'ER 5:Rv=Car. TO WM (DOC a IRAs.) WEST SB9•Syorw PROPOSED BUILDING FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION r 906,00 904.37 TC \ 904.75 TC '903.87 C 903.43 D. r4TER ARO OKRPLOW ARCA LAIRMAILIA OVOVLOw RAR I• Tat 91A0) INLINALIIA DyavLOW RAT. OD Ia•naO) 9.86 FT. 042 "TA I.88 Cr! z sea fss BA97,7 Wo0I0T (Oirn) I LB BASKET 0 0001T RuuaYrl•ROR.) AS LIM Oc3 i000C 09AO )0.000 o 00000 OC PROFILE INFRASAFE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQUAL) 902,53 TC 90220 CI NOT TO SCALE bleRBALON OV:CLO. RATE CO 7• !EACH 0.R Fr 3.00cs TL (0 :3• n001 HT Rerey) a GBS LS BASALT w[.GHT (re4-N?r40x.) SIDE WEIN INFRASAFE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQUAL) failbEMIMISIP ice® LIE § NE ME FRONT VIEW REUSEABLE 400 MICRON FILTER BAG IN EACH BASICET NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. Omer and ConbadorMW 0Man MPCANPOES permit Conine.. shell M responsible Ice ell tees perteelng a eft p0niL The SWPPP stag he bp sae M ri Gone. 2. Inaba temporary erosion cant. measures (I.M probation. tilt fence, rind mdmrear4am saran.) Prior 10 beginning any evavevu or dem ..ones*et the site. 3. Erosion control measures dawn on the erosion 0000 pan are Me ars.. minimum. The contractor shell instal temporary east dices, sediment arms or basins, additional WXa9on tinder disk the sae Rieke totlmcontour. as deemed ...saw b 9M5ermerle.erosidr. changes shell 9e,00,4 S in the SM'PPP. 4. AA conabuat. site Mammon shall be surfaced 1st gashed rock acmes the e.ie WO. of Me 0nlrance and fien 9e entrance e a purl SO kdo to eon.* cone. s. Thel00 of to se fence Man be basted*, a minimum of 6'. The bendbad*Y. Map be compacted with a Hbrakr8 .Mono,,.. 6. AY grading opeaWns ONO be condo.ad n a manner le minimize 3. potential to i amen. Segment cont. pre.k.s most be esb0Madon ri down gradient Pednretea beds cry m gradient land *barbing adi.Yes begin. 7. Ae exposed soil .hall mud be sladfae9 as won as possible to limit soil erosion bd'n no re eter lam? day, a8er3w rnnrrod'on .gorily in Mt pr9cn of Me size Ie,enpoarly or pemenenty ceased. Temporary 0o4paa6wwp4 silpifice00B, day or organic mrpo.M lag., dam 0gWe9r0 dodpuee, demd9on deem. Reggaes. send stockpiles) and 9w ceraglded lane 9vryoefls of reeds, parlay Ids and dmi.ar surfaces are exempt fem. apuirem... B. The mural waged Rene..er of any Weaponry or pamaneni Mme9e der or am.Mst gains miler from my ggen of Me c natdion NM, or diverts w4. around Me see. most be N.B.. wain 2001eee bag from IW pmsrty edge. abeam We per odisdrge irporry swam weer. Sledebon of the end 2001iea feel must be cernpeeg wain 24 hues altar ownedlg b a surface eater. S4Mf®9on of Ow rema1Yg pries of cry 1erlser0ry a pannencl 61da9 e swabs mast he complete *tin 7 gays seer cat emg to a surface water and 0ntadon In Me portion of Medtlm lax tenpor0y or pemaleniy ceased. 9. PipeRsW metbe pa'Medwog ena9Y dieiWto.hen259.xs 0f maamenb eetau 10. AY Meese shy be ailed wig a NIer maled. or soil sepeaIon fabric and comply 0Yh tlr Lames. Department oTanppda9m Standard SpOdflv0on0. 11. A9 Mom seen mchagig ito1w0ands awale bodies shell orlat el 09elov Me nomM water Mull M Me lesyedve** land or water 90dy M an eaw9on where 9edcenetam slope e percent.natter. The camel weerlave shell betlw invert Nerel n of Me awe of the wand.. ewer body. 12 All slam veer retch here net needed for site drainage during canebuaten stud be covered b Prevent runoff horn enerug Me Norm Meer eaten. Cat. basins necewy far Ole drainage dump mnMWion ate be gouged e05 net p*l.aon. 13. In arras.sere cencenimed Ibv. occur (Much as sages and areas in gent at wpm aW pals end intakes) Ma am.n mnirol eri*9es shell be Wiled by MWiatnn structure b prom, time e*Nes horn Me concentrated Bpvs. M. Impact the ceraadiml site ance every sewn days during ac*ve mnirudim end awn 24 hone .her a mrda5 avant greater Man 03 ides in 24 hors. AM inspections S,*I be recalled in Me 15. A9 sM fences must he repaira4 replaced, or supplemented w W n they 4.09.5e non..b W or the sediment reach, In of M height of the fence. Tun repairs mud he made edhn 24 hop of discovery, eras span as Beer cemetery Now sews. All repairs Null W recorded in red S(PPP. 16. N sedimeni escapes Me construction W. ORie aoam1alio e of sediment must W mewed n a manner rind ea (npamuy mmdenl b mini.ze off.. imam. 17. Meals traded one payment slat be enured daily. 18. AY iKea4ion rims mug he inspected b Mat sedimert from ogoigmnatd019 adMy a reMlin9 9e infiltration wee and Men maws am protected from comgelon die eona.on equipment driving weals the in6PUY01r area. 19. T0nporary5.400d0e0 must have se len. pother &B ave sediment conbels, end cannot he placed a arch ewers. ndu6ng gum. com0yamces 0905 05 94E.seer llulaer agtwrs, a conduits and dings unless Mere 4 a bypass n place for the eomr,Mar. 20. Cda4ed sediment, asphalt end carve, (.Pigs 9001g dehea, pap., plastic, arts mmtrudbn W damdWn mbis and ether its must he disposed. popedy and must comply wind MPG diaper rgdremem. 21. Oat, gasob., pie end ery hru4uus sutelences must he properly shed. nd4ig secondary mMeimnenl, a prevent apes... or ...discharge. Re W i4ed awes to storage err mast he provided to prevent vandal.. Storage seer dispose ofhaaNaaa mate must hen compliance WM MPCA regulations. 22. Elec. waning of Iasi, and ether mr8MMBom whims mug he limited 0 a defined eon of Me aka. Rape mast he canned end waste properly disposed of No engine 40705. gla allowed 23. All lipid and solid wets generated by c rereb warm. apea9ons must W eon.. in a Manpoof...i.rpefamtiy atpermeable 010 A compa.a9day Ike Mel dos Mriot warp*Ikpids to enter ground ter is considered an impermeable Yner. The Paid and solid wastes must net conga gone ground, and Mere.. cal he run. from the curate ripe ...ens or Mae Liquid and solid wastes met he disposed of pe5M7 end n m1Pkance veh MPG ng*Y9or.. A ion must he kauded adjvt to e0M tern Beaky a inform concrete epgmm(op0rebrs a Mi400 gee page Mies. 24. Upon ...on of Ma project and Ma W mlion of el graded sees. .5 lamprey erosion mnbd facili es Net Maces. hey W W. arc) tall be *from Me are. 25. All p01ns,ere sedimentation bone mast he restored 10 0 .r design 0nri9on imati9My 690wig te.Palim.IW We. 26. Contractor Merl submit Notice of Termmeion for MPCANPDES per... 30 days Aber FOM GRADING NOTES I. Gads shown in peed .es represent finish 0ava0nn. L. Restore a9 digurbed turf Maas wbl 4' d good quality topsoil a l seed. AI ms,pdion shall he performed in sadden weh rate and ecel *Mani specificlone for cone melee 4. 004054 mWeerppes One. cleared 0M Op tap added 10seAg Owed endsedore. SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND B.SMARMS C=CONCRETE TC=TOP O CUSS II. GUTTER CURB •e FEU)MEP i ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE NORTH 0 15 30 60 Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC Lawson Commons 380 SL Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 651.2223701 Consul.. .5 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Lateens Road White Bear Lake. MN 55110 651.481.9120 (t)551.481.9201 www.larsonenge.com Hrq ably weer pa.torsiswamtewino4 marremnpawed. fure..R00*SS u a rinaft ow. Woman niches A Papty, PE. Dare 032.11 Pa. hem 4as Inue. For lean Date _TW show nay Wa Rea fray. The Ow giew is FAag oar Fd S.Nut Daainp S*N9 spy to FUN Sire Bee. COMM,Daze Dom iger De.. . (laded 310090980 MALI GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 51mm tare C3 • Copyright BWBR Arc iocts L CT 4* SAN TO EXST MANHOLE AT895.09• NO INVERT ELEVATION = 896.091) 2 sTMlts NV =900.00 L _ 80 LF,4'DRi5N 111lt°@ MIN RIM = 904.50 laN=89981 STMH3 RIM = 903.00 INV•89BA1 i .: r • D )aETTM 6• EIXWe uE SERVIIErowM 561:14,9r: 5B9.5,•D,•'. WEST HANCOCK STREET I r. I I .F- J `1 L_ CONNECT4• SAN TO BLDG STUB @ S OUTSICE BLDG WALL @ INV.899.00 PROPOSED BUILDING 66610 SHRUBS - r- STAN-1 RIM =90320 2 INV=895.43 FJW e 5815,'Orw 385.80 WOW WALL UTILITY NOTES 1. Its the.BaDw,i0y of Me 9Mratlorb perform or ma4iab MI necessary Wily connections and rebcalorm Lam existing Way 90BOBa to Me proposed building, as sal an to alienate amen.. Taw can wdium include lal am nth Smiled to inner, sanitary sewn, table TV, Waive, Ala, electric, she 8 54rg. et 2. AM service conned/ere WMN be performed n aoa:tlnaa we, NW. and led Handled specifications for owerudon. UMW connections (sanitary wear.. n nein, and Moen saner) may require •pane 3. TMmdMnr Nab serf, ese elaalba al proposed corms to dkng Mew prior any danelaion or mem.. 4. Tmleaps or shall notify MI app9pd2m wwWwirg departments and Maly cerrs sales 72 Ave prom 030581=1b1. M ratcwry pr9taW9n Nay be made le avoid damage o 9ssting Whine. 5. Borni saner worsens betnp n emdaev nob serves. pbnoig ease 4715.2820 Mere lo®letl NNW 10 (eel of °alertines or Me budding. 6. 1.10PEMorm miner piping and fillings nal nisei Haber. aed'Mkletbt wends. per Mimesde plumbing code 4715.0420.6C(4) and 4715.0640.0 bclua g ASTM 03212pW passe M and ASTM C2321 *191 n practices. T. AN RCP pa slave en ea pea Hal M Ia4.8r eon 3. 8. Ma* Mniam d T%' of sever Own all Name Ana and sanitary saner lies. Instal weer lines fiFWow v.te, Ne9as, where saewintery aver over ewer line. OMM west pi ping of mae4to ets mewl we1ennestandards tar 9IMa bon Wes and Hainan 1r of •eg awn. 9. Where 7%'el mores lwl presided OW sanitary Bawer and wain Ma•. NNW Tripe, polystyrene bw4edon PAMDOT 3760) swan • Wen. eeesbnce of at Maid 5 wed a mmpesvn wage, of et Teen 25 psi. Insulation dull be 4'sake, crested ever pipe win S and nation between pipe and NSWetion. Where depth is ea Men S. use 4' el is *. 10. Sa Pmpdspecfchlons ler bedding reglsaen . 11. Pae3ae red and dined N new0wbmwia in accordance we, 0913 and WM namiremeNe. 12 Sanitary saner piping snail be PVC, 008.35or depths bn Man 12, PVC SDR-26 for depths Women 12 and 26', and Was 52 DTP. b depths of23 or more. BASINF BOTTOM OF SAND 889.00 2 893.00 3 900E0 12 PEA GRAVEL CLEAN SAND NO -WOVEN SOIL SEPARATION FABRIC- •MIRAP 170N CR EQUAL- 4 PERFORATED PE PIPE (CONNECT TO CATCH BASIN) BIO RETENTION BASIN NOT D SCALE PRECAST INVERT SHOULD BE 12 DIAMETER OF PIPE AND aEN C ES SLOPED T TOWARD INVERT. MANHOLE STEPS SMALL BE PLACED SO THAT OFFSET IDLE IN TOP SLAB IS FACING DOWNSTREAM. NO BLOCK STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED MANHOLE FRAME 6 COVER: CB: NEENAHR-2501, TYPE GRATE MN KEENAN R-1642TYPEB LID MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINDS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH AND A 41 COLLAR MINE OUTSIDE NO SHIMS OF ANY MATERAL ALLOWED. 6= PRECAST REINFORCED COMMIE SUB. 110 MANHOLE STEPS,COPOLYMEREOLYMERF0LYPROPYLENE PLASTIC, WITH112 GRADE WI STEEL REINFORCEMENT OR EOUAL 18.0.C. PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION PIPE BALL BE CUT OUT RUSH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL. WATERTIGHT CONECTIGN ��■�.�(BOOT,TYPICAL)1111111ib-- SEAL WITH 2 BEADS OF RATS EN. ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO NAVE O RING RUBBER GASKETS. MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS IS 81 FOR 14. DEPTH INCREASE TUCNNESS 11 FOR EVERY 4' OF DEPTH GREATER TAN 14', AND REINFORCE SECTION WITH. REBAR@8•EW. STORM SEWER JUNCTION MANHOLE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NORTH 0 15 30 00 Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC Lawson Ci3Dm0115 380 S1. Peter Seen, Seise 600 Saint Paul, het 55102 651.2223701 Cnnnulom Fip Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 La4Oe Road White Beer Lake, IAN 55110 651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201 wwW.Mrsonen¢.com :::= m ewvmsna avvam4 asY w.�a�u vwl'netru�ievs rw�w.e men. m*M9.PE Due012211 [w. No. OMB Item Due I- SPosst Razed Can. Ma Trd*wsl• log a• NA Sze Meet 0.869 sues apse a For sin snmwa Du OY4/11 IBM Comm. No. (]clad 31509053.00 USIA West lure UTILITY PLAN Sivea C4 Copyright BWBRAet.hi9.t.d t r (MSG A YEAS.) WEST serst'orw HANCOCK c9,31:7-1M i1 1 1 •i•ilif 111•11111iiil!;!j,;11 • iiii1i•1•111•••1••1•1••1••1•1••11:1• • 111•Ii,1111•1•••111•1i11;•••1••11••• • 11•11i I•111i i111•1•• • I • 111i;11111i i1i;111•i!li111••1111'11•1•;1111•111 •111i1f i•Th11••111iii,•m•ii,•:,t1 , --!- - ;i1•11ii,i1••Ii•;•1•1Ii•;111;1••,,i1 -....— • • : • ! : ; ••••7.11Z1•1WW,MM.' •1•••,' • • • ; i 1 ,1 i• • 'Li; r•'•'', • , ; 1 1 . • • ' .7 .• -tay •-• Lawson Commons 380 SL Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, 6024 55102 651.2223701 5 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore Road While Bear Lake, IAN 55110 551.481.9120 (0) 651.481.9201 www.larsonengroarn ("iftlyta... ...Yea mem mie.0../ M.Winiutenirnim•duly1.1* AM, Piabobeilelpnewu.r site Med kernesailL ,:.. .. • .....-: TURNBUCKLE Y.. DOUBLE STRAND MS 0 A GAUGE AIRE - 3 PER TREE '-'•'1 :4--' F..i II' 4--6" LAYER a SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE ° FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO P.: EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE rf. — OUTSIDE THE BALL Ai ANGLE - 3 PER 216 ":2:x3Er STAKES SET 120' APAR T . .M 4":13.••,• *.ldre-l'Z'L..."20",••r TRF-E SAVE AREAS SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITH ORANGE TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SHALL BE SIGNED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A ONE•YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PLANT MATERIALS. TIE WARRANTY BEGINS ON THE DATE OF INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATFRIAI 01 SHALL ALSO HAVE A 01E-YEAR WARRANTYCOMMENCING UPON PLIWTING. USE A NIWINUM OF lr LONA PLANTING SOIL ON TREES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL unimEs PRIOR TO INSTALLATION PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY • PER STANDARD MASEFtY PRACTICE. OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE ONLY MICR WRITTEN AC.CEPTANCE. TREES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL TO THE SITE. PROPERLY HEEL•IN MATERIALS TEMPORARILY, IF ACCESSARY. .1 DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ADEEP SHAU. BE PROVIDED AROUND ALL INSTALLED TREES. IS. POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (AO MIL I-1 /2. NIDE STRAP rm., ) DOUBLE STRAND It GA. WIRE - 3. 0 1200 INTERVAL (TyP) IREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH iT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES. HOSEER, DE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FCR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION DWOUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD m q 0 r ■ -I m E x 0 0 ■ q 0 ■ 3 PK2 PARKING LOT 30' POLE AND 400W, MN 208 FIXTURE CONCRETE BASE -20' LICIT FIXTURE SCHEDULE NOTES - ;; LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE !! ! 79 PARKING LOT FIXTURE ;§ , ). § !` 30' POLE AND CONCRETE BASE / | ; 208 VOLT. HPF -20- COLD WEATHER 208 VOLT. HPF -20' COLD WEATHER F. §g !! 4PF DIE CAST HOUSING, TAMPER UTHONIA KAD SERIES WEATHER HARDWARE. TEMPERED CLASS LENS, ENCO EOUAL TYPE m ROADWAY D15T DUALITY EOUAL FUSING. DARK BRONZE FIN15H TERSE BASE. REFER TO DETAIL 2 ON THIS SHEET. DIE CAST HOUSING. TAMPER HARDWARE, TEMPERED GLASS LENS. TYPE V AREA PST. FUSING. DARK BRONZE FINISH DIE CAST MOUSING. TAMPER HARDWARE. TEMPERED CLASS LENS, TYPE Iv FORWARD THROW D15T. FUSING, DARK BRONZE FINISH P ; UTHONIA KAD SERIES EI.ICO EDUAL OUALITY EDUAL UTMONIA KAD SERIES AI EMCO EP DUALITY EDUAL ANUFACTURER/ CATALOG SERIES - - ) 0 `a k� 0 k to ■ m 0 r a.a.:.....,,a..a, __«m« e 0 0 SIXTH STREET Io MU , |||ff �m|I« )(g . t g ; ,|§!Engineering, | I •.. , , §! / g|**Inc — 2008PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ST LLWATERJUNI R HIGH SCHOOL 523 WEST MARSH STREET ST LLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 STLLWATER PUBLIC SCHOOLSm, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ■8 4 1875 SOUTH GREELEY STREET �Larson ,Inc. 3520 Labors Read \051.081.9201Bear Lake, MN anonismer.. ST LLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 ©© &_, � — Planning Commission DATE: April 7, 2011 APPLICANT: Alpine Capital, LLC CASE NO.: 11-11 REQUEST: A zoning text amendment to City Code Section 31-304 entitled "CTR cove traditional residential district" related to garages. PC DATE: April 11, 2011 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner1AQ Pa REVIEWERS: Community Development Director BACKGROUND Alpine Capital, LLC, is requesting a zoning text amendment specifically to City Code Section 31-304 (c)(1) subnote 2, which currently states: "Garages must be setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 30 percent of the lots, garage may extend beyond the front line of the dwelling. The garage may be side loaded." The CTR and two other "cove" zoning districts were established in the fall of 2000 for the Settlers Glen development. The only property within the City that is currently zoned CTR are 11 lots along Morgan Court. Currently three homes along Morgan Court have garages that are set closer than six feet behind the front wall of the house or porch. One of these homes has a side loaded garage which is entirely in front of the home. The other two homes have garages that sit between four feet behind and two feet in front of the front of the home or porch. As currently written, all of the remaining homes are required to have their garages setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the home or porch. This would preclude any additional side loaded garages similar to what the applicant would like to build. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that Section 31-304 (c)(1) subnote 2 be amended to state the following: "Garages must be setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 30 percent of the lots, garage may extend beyond the front line of the dwelling. The garage may be side loaded. Additionally, side loaded garages are exempt but must meet special design consideration of four side architecture." CTR Garage Standards Page 2 DISCUSSION Of the 11 lots zoned CTR, currently seven are built on or under construction and four are vacant, so any change will likely have a minimum impact. However, even though these are the only lots currently zoned CTR in the City, the Commission should remember that it is possible that additional land could be rezoned to the CTR classification in the future. Staff has discussed the issue with the current property owner (Alpine Capital, LLC) and Pratt Homes who is driving this change. It appears that this is the only lot that is seeking to construct a home outside of the current regulations. One alternative would be to tweak the percentage and existing language to permit the garage while at the same time ensuring that the community's desire to lessen the impact of garages on neighborhoods is also preserved. To that aim, staff suggests the following language: "Garages must be setback at least six feet behind the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 40 percent of the lots, garages may be placed in front of the six-foot setback. For the 40 percent garage in front of the six-foot setback, front facing garages can be no more than two feet in front of the front wall of the house or porch; and for side loaded garages, they may be in front of the home but must meet special design consideration of four side architecture." Staff has discussed this with both Alpine Capital, LLC and Pratt Homes and they are comfortable with Staff's recommendation. Therefore, if the Commission were inclined to permit the proposed side loaded garage, then staff would recommend that it be limited as proposed by Staff. ALTERNATIVES The Planning Commission has the following options: 1. Recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment as requested by the applicant. 2. Recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment as recommended by City Staff. 3. Recommend denial of the proposed ordinance amendment. 4. Continue the public hearing until the May 9, 2011 Planning Commission meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval the revision to Section 31-304 (c)(1) subnote 2 of the Stillwater City Code as proposed by City Staff. March 18, 2011 Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 To Whom It May Concern: Please find attached for your consideration a Planning Administration Application Form requesting a zoning text amendment. The reason for this request is a garage set back "6 feet from the front wall of the home" would place design constraints on Lot 5. I've included a rendering illustration of a comparison of house massing issues and subsequent outcomes. Our rambler home is designed for a long term Stillwater "empty nest" resident who would like to stay in the city they love. The comparison gets down to the visual impact of a three car front Toad garage vs. three car side Toad. Even set back 6 feet from the front wall of the home, the front Toad garage tends to dominate the front facade. The side Toad garage softens the garage impact and staggers the home massing further from the street. Included with the application are the following attachments: • Check for $500 payable to the City of Stillwater • Signed check list for Planning Applications • Planning Administration Application Form • Planning Administration Application Form attachment — Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Request • Code Sec 31-304 printout with requested text change • Plat map with proposed house location on Lot 5, Block 2, Settlers Glen 5th Addition • Plat map with comparison of house location using existing vs. proposed garage setback requirements • Plat map of Settlers Glen 5th Addition, Lot 5, Block 2 • Topographical map of Settlers Glen 5th Addition • Plans and elevations for a proposed side Toad garage house • Pictures of side load garage homes built by Pratt Homes Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please call me on my cell phone at 612-834-1718, Since , Leonard W. Pratt Enclosures Check list for Planning Applications Incomplete or unclear applications/plans will be returned to the applicant and may result In decay of application processing, Check and attach to application. G The application form completed and signed by the property owner or owners authorized representative. o A complete legal description of subject property. O Building plans clearly dimensioned and scaled (16 copies). a The site plan showing exterior property lines, easements, lot width and depth and lot area building(s) location. (See attached site plan example, a parcel boundary survey may be required). ❑ All adjacent streets or right of ways labeled. D Location, elevation, size, height of building or addition, dimensions, materials and proposed use of ail buildings and structures (including walls, fences, signs, lighting and hooding devices) existing and proposed for- the site (if the site is in a Historic District, additional design detail maybe required). U Distances between all structures and between all property lines or easements and structures. • Show Adjacent buildings to this application site and dimension from property line. ❑ All major existing trees on the site (4 inch caliber or greater), giving type, location, size and other site coverage conditions. D Show existing significant natural features such as rock outcroppings or water courses (existing and proposed marked accordingly). D Locate all off-street parking spaces, driveways, loading docks and maneuvering areas with dimensions for driveway widths and parking space sizes. ❑ Pedestrian, vehicular and service points of ingress and egress; distances between driveways and street corners. D Landscape plan showing number of plants, location, varieties and container sizes (landscape plan). ❑ Existing and proposed grading plan showing direction and grade of drainage through and off the site; indicate any proposed drainage channels or containment facilities. ❑ Required and existingstreet dedications and improvements such as sidewalks, curbing and pavement (may not be required). ❑ Letter to the Planning Commission describing the proposed use in detail and indicating how this use will effect and compatibility with adjacent uses or areas. CI Applications for new structures on slopes of 12 percent or greater must include an accurate topographic map_ The map must contain contours of two -foot intervals for slopes of 12 percent or greater. Slopes over 24 percent shall be clearly marked. Other such data as may he required to permit the planning commission to make the required findings for approval of the specific type of application. 3 �-070/I Date PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER MN 95082 Case No: Date Filed: Fee Paid: Receipt No.:___ -- ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Zoning Amendment* Variance Planning Unit Development * Resubdivision Certificate of Compliance Subdivision" "'—Lot Line Adjustment 'Comprehensive Plan Amendment* *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees. The fees for requested action are attached to this application. P The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of ail forms and suppt*ting material subrnttted in conneeo fa with any application. All supporting material (I e , photos, sketches, etc } submitted Withapplication t omes the property " applicators_tcil fevieW than a City of Stillwater. Sixteen {i6) copies of supportingnaterialare requir�l. if makes Co" it5/ Adtnlnitlen total of twenty-eight (28) copies are required to be submitted. Review the Checklist to the Planning Application Form for the complete llsf of required items that must be submitted.uAn IApplicationsnconwill be rejected suDportin.al-materfel will cause your appllcsallon *the be raj d bar "tire C1ty4 q without a legal description. A legal description is foun on the deed to the property. Attach as an exhibit If necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Assessor's Parcel No, Address of Project (GEO Code) Complete Property Legal Description* ,..-- (*Required — Applications will be rejected without a legal description) Tax descriptions and property descriptions from the county are not acceptable. /� G'T F---. Descrl tion of Projectc 7 o .7-+P 1G I domfm eo le... �-�- 7 flu Zoning District p"x''"'' "l hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify l Will comply with the permit if it Is granted and used." Required If other than property owner Property Owner """.6 44 Representative Mailing Address Pro/ Ord N. `e'to OD Mailing Address City - State — Zip 4 %7 )4)City - State — Zip Telephone No. r"Ii ".0401 Telephone No. Email mil )? m? itats. 4,01Email "P..`g"tr:`r,14 Signature FILES�CONTENT.O OOK1K6SUF`JRYNPLANAP DOCX July 2, 0MPORARY INTERNET (Signature is required) PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM ATTACHMENT Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Request Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Settlers Glen 5th Addition, Lot 5, Block 2 8150 Morgan Avenue North, Stillwater, MN 55082 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed is the application for text amendment to Sec 31-304 CTR cove traditional residential district. Sub -section (c) Massing regulations (1) Minimum standards Front setback for garage Existing Footnote 2: Garage must be setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 30 percent of the Lots, garages may extend beyond the front line of the dwelling. These garages may be side loaded. Proposed New Footnote 2: Garage must be setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 30 percent of the lots, garages may extend beyond the front line of the dwelling. These garages may be side loaded. Additionally, side loaded garages are exempt but must meet special design consideration of four sided architecture. (d) Design review. Administrative design review by the community development director is required for all permitted and specially permitted buildings or uses in the Lakeshore district. Building siting, grading, drainage, tree protection and erosion control measures must be reviewed by the community development director for each development site. At standards are rninimum requirements unless otherwise noted. z Front facing garages must be setback at least six fee more than the front wall or porch line of the house. House and garage setbacks are strongly encouraged to meet special design guidelines for variety of garage types and locations (front loaded, side loaded and recessed) and -front and exterior side house elevations. Where two or more adjacent lots do not meet street frontage requirements, the driveways must be combined. 4 Measured from right-of-way line. Sec. 31-304. CTR cove traditional residential district. CTR cove traditional residential districts shall be regulated as follows: (a) Allowable uses. See Table in Section 31-315 for the allowable uses within this district. (b) Accessory uses and structures. One detached garage subject to the three conditions below, or one accessory dwelling subject to regulations in Section 31.501, Subd. 2. (1) Detached accessory structures may not have window openings facing the rear property line. (2) Detached accessory structures located on corner lots must have the garage doors turned away from the side street. (3) If there are two garages on site, at least one garage must not face the street or streets if a corner lot, (c) Massing regulations. (1) Minimum standards.1 TABLE INSET: Lot area 14,000 square feet Lot width (at building setback Iine) 80 feet Lot width on cut -de -sac (at front lot line) 40 feet Front yard setback 25 feet 2 Front setback for garage See footnote 2 on this page Side yard setback Interior 7.5 feet Corner 20 feet Rear yard 25 feet Building height 2 stories. not to exceed 35 feet Driveway width. maximum (at front lot line) 14 feet (2) Additional setback standards. TABLE INSET: Trunk Highway 96 (Stonebridge Trail to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet McKusick Road (Neal Ave. to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet County Rd. 12 (Northland Ave. to Co Rd. 15) 100 feet County Rd. 15 (Trunk Highway 36 to Trunk Highway 96) 100 feet Railroad 75 feet All standards are minimum requirements unless otherwise noted. 2 Garages must be setback at least six feet beyond the front wall of the house or porch. Except that on 30 percent of the lots, garages may extend beyond the front line of the dwelling. These garages may be side loaded. Additionally, side loaded garages are exempt but must meet special design consideration of four sided architecture. r - : Mr kat 221 • :x4,•-• • cd 0 w z ' • ''.+4.!i.40, • : ise • -.le- • • • • .• • • gt • . .. . . it • t• -:•••• t • • 4.4: • .4t,444114'c'' 1. 7. 4'4: • .„ ...•••..... 14) ..J 1,.4, 4:-.r.44•'• *2-:-' :4,::•x-' rif*^:. A•• 414.:”..:: ::4441: • .....„..„:ii . .. .. - ......:„i.„..4.-,,...7*irr.:„..i...4,.... : r ..4„,„.. .....„. ii.,:,-...,,, .„..:.....4:......, .,....... .:,... ‘...i, 4...- 1 •-74:14' • • „ .. • cO, •"%.. • :- .• • • • • • • • 17/11*.• . • ..:"."7""'"1.'s."%44, }cf. • ' tD WV* \ a 1 Aen ppWx ,a rrnr+u2f • r r. m z o tgt I int g 00/ ? ; eta et 911 _ ..y . { 1 ti r . •r .J J,. v va�.J \ '!tomtel \ 0 r 0 i 4 • rrt• t•. •. , I"4'(�l t L f I go .. 1 1 ����ee�r !era---, tl • • W, ea 10 0898td'M:^d ZO S-3 uo+slaay 1a4uWnN 1334$ it Hd - M1NId lHIN3 NOHV13Y314103S NOtSOS3 aUl11344S .v.. nrvtpeg w a4.e NetuurS uotteatllt3a3 NI? 'H31041111S uuile3a-i NO11100V HIS N319 SH31113S pato3d .3u11,00X uv.u+.�.+aocs 311 W1idV9 3NId1V • uaz.<,. 444 an1w...sa•r wm:,v.ua;0 ...+.5 .__---'«a0so ;100. r.l 34,.re r.mw 1.0 lino3ll'Ri9tt311=V 1dO VIMW9POIN R3 WESt,49FYG 0 7MS :i ARM ut JF.NYdM1M•I CWn,. w004.041M+.zi.11C0. n :MYuzusSoru. Wm>•,Y pz4;49uv.a.rWNfAi'^.cMz>.M tz:WL Yi i+aaCx.rJk'..Y�tOwp 1/g1=1.tS'G33 .3b 11ri+ 06* aww ,tmaa 1 l�ea�� S-%a) c)-0w4 ad 110Z 3116!a4Cdo3 d u6!saa sawuoH ; panaasaa s;y6!b 17 a Friday, March 18, 2011 ST OLAF SIDE LOAD Buyers Name Plan M Salesman Addition PRATT 3500 Willow Lake Boulevard Suit 100 Vandnais Heights,MN. Fa HOMES 6 Fax 51-429-0255 651-429-8032 ilkikkft=wimm Address Lot Block Builders License No 1 ' n 0 5 s rt O i 1* rt 30 3 0 N v 0 t0 3 a 43. s N 0 to 0 0 0. Friday, March 18, 2011 Buyers Name Plan ST OLAF SIDE LOAD 11111) GI m Salesman Addition PRATT Suit Willow Lake Boulevard Suit 100 Vandnais Heights,MN, 55110 IV Address jHot'lEs I Fax 651 429-8032 255 Lot Block \kami. Builders License No 1 -411J Copyright 2011 Pratt Homes Design All Rights Reserved 44 -0" 20'-8" 23'-4" 10'-0" 10'-8" T-2" 4'-3" 2'-11 AW51 \ 14'-6" 8'-10" 4'-6" 4'-6" 4'-6 1/4" 4'-3 3/4" TW28510 TW28510 101 8/L ll-Z 1V 8/L Ll -1 — — J 0. 0, m 12'-0 CXW1? FIXED 11-4" 6'-8" 4'-8" 6-7 1/2" 6-10 1/2" 2-0" 3'-0 1/4" 3-0 WO DR 8 C155 w S• 4' E 1l\ z 6) 60 7- o Z 4832 FG a SHR ti ZV \ 3' 6" 2-6 PD 4'-3 1/2' 2- 9 1/2 ML 2-TW3452 18'-3" 2-4 O 6 0 T-: m \ °CO _nTDy X N w 0 z 0 -n mm nZ 5-0 PKT _ONNDOECUBEW viiWIOW N 2-8 03 0c 3v 3'-11 1/4' BENCH (OPT) n 0 11/' 7'-8 1/2 NNE 0) w m 3'-8" m 17'-0 1/4" C o w 9' 10 1/4" 41, ■ xi 0 0 0m VAULT CEILING 2576D-60611R 2-9 1/2 ML 6-0 SLIDER 0 (1 On 0m nm z 13'-0" -0 01 AA m 7'-0 1/2" 6'-9" 6 0 2-8 CO 0 3-0 CO 27 CAB b n 4_J N sz co 30 PED w A 2-4 P z 6-8 1/4" - 5'-11" 123'-0 1/2" 0 m 8'-2 5/8" 3'-9 7/16 13'-9 1/2" 12'-0 1/16" 2-2x12 HDRS 5'-0" 7 0 2 m z 2- 9 1/2 ML TW2452/0HP 1052/TW2452 6'-6" 6.-9" 13'-3" a 1 Friday, March 18, 2011 ST OLAF SIDE LOAD Buyers Name Plan m Salesman Addition PRATT 3500 Willow Lake Boulevard Suit 100 Vandnais Heights,MN" 55110 CO Address 'HOMES I Fax 651-429-0255 651-429-8032 Lot Block Builders License No 1 J 16FLOOR TRUSSES DESIGNED BY MANFUCT. - GAME ROOM UTILITY 2x4 BEARING WALL 20x8 CONC FTG NOTE: EXACT WINDOWS TBD, POSSIBLY VINYL WINDOWS. SIZES SIMILIAR TO WINDOWS SHOWN ST. OLAF LOWER LEVEL SCALE: 1/8" = 1'0" STAIR NOTES 15 RISERS © 7 9/16" = 113.75" 14 TREADS @ 10.0" = 140.0" LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8" =1'0" CEILING HEIGHT= 8'-1" OPTIONPL FIREPLACE & BUILT-INS 16" FLOOR TRUSSES DESIGNED BY MANFUCT. "WIMMI1M. 0 Builders License No 1 ST OLAF SIDE LOAD as cL 8-5 a) E as c z as u, E co co ;2 S.). a) a) -1:3 = Ta -o co (1) < Friday, March 18, 2011 PAGE 4 Copyright 2011 Pratt Homes Design All Rights Reserved parer THE BIRTHPLACE OF MtNNESOTA PLANNING REPORT DATE: APPLICANT: April 4, 2011 City of Stillwater CASE NO.: 2011-04 REQUEST: 1) Create PROS (Park, Recreation or Open Space) Zoning District 2) Rezone Properties that are Inconsistent with 2030 Comp Plan PUBLIC HEARING: April 11, 2011 REPORT AUTHOR: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director REVIEWED BY: Dave Magnuson, City Attorney; Mike Pogge, City Planner BACKGROUND On June 1, 2010 the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan was adopted. State law requires that once a new or updated comprehensive plan is adopted all of a city's "official controls" must be made consistent with it. One of those official controls is the zoning map. The City Planning Department reviewed the zoning map for inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan's future land use map. 403 properties were found to be zoned inconsistently. 303 of them are related to a new zoning district envisioned by the 2030 Comp Plan. The new district is to be known as the PROS (Park, Recreation or Open Space) Zoning District and the ordinance that would create the district is a part of this public hearing discussion. For each of the future land use map's categories there are a number of zoning districts that are considered to be consistent. For example, if the future land use map shows a property guided for LDR (Low Density Residential), there are four consistent zoning district classifications: RA (One Family), TR (Traditional Residential), LR (Lakeshore Residential) and CR (Cottage Residential). If a property guided LDR is not zoned as one of these four districts, the zoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the inconsistency has to be resolved. To resolve the inconsistencies, each of the properties must either to be rezoned or the future land use map needs to be amended for them. Page 2 of 30 SPECIFIC REQUESTS 1. Adopt an ordinance establishing the PROS (Park, Recreation or Open Space) Zoning District. 2. Adopt an ordinance changing the zoning district classification for the inconsistently zoned properties. 3. For nine inconsistently zoned properties that will require Special Use Permits when rezoned, adopt a rezoning ordinance that will become effective only after Special Use Permits are approved for them. EVALUATION OF REQUESTS 1. Adopt an ordinance establishing the PROS (Park, Recreation or Open Space) Zoning District. Currently public and private parks, athletic fields, golf courses, nature preserves and miscellaneous recreational and natural open spaces are zoned residential, commercial, or industrial. They are all proposed to be rezoned to the PROS district. This rezoning would add another layer of protection further guaranteeing these existing park and related open space uses would not be converted into residential, commercial or industrial uses as their current zoning would allow. Before any property can be rezoned to PROS such a zoning district must be created first. Attached is a draft ordinance that, if adopted, would create the zoning district. As with every zoning district in the Stillwater Zoning Code, this district would have three elements: purpose statement, list of allowable uses and massing regulations. The proposed language for each element is included here. Purpose. Private and public parks, recreation and natural open spaces are essential to support community health and wellness, connecting the individual resident to natural and ecological stewardship and appreciation, promoting cultural resources, and fostering the economic vitality of the community Allowable uses. Use Permissibility' Parks P Trails P Park Structures2 P Playgrounds P Nature Preserve P Athletic Fields with lights3 SUP ' P = Permitted; SUP = allowed by Special Use Permit; ACC = allowed as an accessory improvement to an allowed use located on or adjacent to the site. 2 Gazebo, picnic shelter, playground equipment, rest rooms, band shelter, and substantially similar park structures; but not including multiple purpose park buildings or recreation center buildings. 3 6 acre minimum site area. Page 3 of 30 Use (Continued) Permissibility4 Outside tennis courts with lights5 SUP Outside basketball courts with lights5 SUP Outside hockey rinks with lights5 SUP Athletic Fields without lights3 P Outside tennis courts without lights P Outside basketball courts without lights P Outside hockey rinks without lights P Recreation Center6 SUP Multiple Purpose Park Building SUP Golf Course' P Golf Course Club House SUP Public boat launch P Other passive recreational or natural open spaces P Parking lot ACC (c) Massing regulations. Minimum standards Minimum lot area NA Maximum structure height Single story, 20 feet or less Structure setback from public right of way 50 feet Structure setback from all other property lines 50 feet Impervious area 25% of site8 a P = Permitted; SUP = allowed by Special Use Permit; ACC = allowed as an accessory improvement to an allowed use located on or adjacent to the site. 5 3 acre minimum site area. 6 10 acre minimum site area. ' 80 acre minimum site area. s For Park, Recreation or Open Space uses including public boat launches, pocket parks and public recreation centers where customary usage would require more than 25% impervious area on a site, a Special Use Permit may be issued by the City Council for greater than 25% impervious cover. Page 4 of 30 2. Adopt an ordinance changing the zoning district classification for the inconsistently zoned properties. The owners for each of the 403 inconsistently zoned properties, as well as all of their neighbors within 350 feet, were mailed notices of their respective neighborhood meeting and each of the scheduled public hearings for this consistency project. During the many discussions before, during and after the neighborhood meetings 30 properties surfaced that merit an alternate method for resolving their Comp Plan inconsistencies. The other 373 properties were uncontested and continue to be included in the list of properties to be rezoned and appear in Reference Tables 1 and 2. The inconsistencies for the 30 "alternate method" properties will be resolved in one of four ways: A. Leave the property zoned as it is, since it will still be consistent with the Comp Plan land use map. There are three such properties: ID #119, #120, #182. Details for each are found in Reference Table 3. B. Leave the property zoned as it is and resolve the inconsistency by amending the future land use map. There are 11 such properties. 1. The first 10 are all located on Linson Circle. ID #10-12, 17-23. Details for each are found in Reference Table 3. All of these lots have duplexes on them. Two of the neighborhood's property owners have requested that the lots be left zoned RB, Two Family Residential as they now are. To resolve the inconsistency, the future land use map would be amended to reguide these lots LMDR (Low/Medium Density Residential) instead of the current MDR (Medium Density Residential). The land use map amendment would be the subject of a separate public hearing in the near future. 2. The 11th property is SE-TAC located at 1778 Greeley. ID #25. Like the gas station next door, this property will remain zoned BP-C. To resolve the inconsistency with the future land use map, the map will be changed from Industrial to Commercial. The land use map amendment would be the subject of a separate public hearing in the near future. C. Leave the property zoned as it is and change the consistency table (Table 1.8) of the Comprehensive Plan by making the existing zoning of the property consistent with the property's future land use classification. There are three such properties: ID #366, #367, #368. Currently these are all zoned AP (Agricultural Preservation). Details for each are found in Reference Table 3. The owner asked that they stay zoned AP. To resolve the inconsistency, the AP zoning district would have to be added to the Table 1.8 list of consistent zoning districts in the PRS (Park, Rec or Open Space) future land use classification. Reference Table 3. D. Rezone the property to some consistent zoning district other than what is proposed. There are 13 such properties including all marina properties and the St. Croix Boat & Packet shoreline properties. (ID #14, 29, 31, 32, 41, 45-50, 52, 53. Details for each are found in Reference Table 3). The owners of Wolf Marina asked that marina properties be rezoned to CA, General Commercial. But if rezoned to CA, any use Page 5 of 30 listed in that zoning district would be allowed on the river shore property. Since the St. Croix River Overlay District specifically prohibits most of the uses allowed in the CA zoning district, rezoning to CA is not a realistic option. Another solution is necessary to resolve the marina inconsistencies. Therefore, the 13 properties have been removed from this public hearing and will be addressed as part of a separate public hearing in the near future. 3. For nine inconsistently zoned properties that will require Special Use Permits when rezoned, adopt a rezoning ordinance that will become effective only after Special Use Permits are approved for them. The second rezoning ordinance identifies nine properties that are proposed to be rezoned to RCM, Medium Density Residential. In each instance the existing use is allowed in the RCM Zoning District by Special Use Permit. Therefore, city staff is recommending that these properties be rezoned to RCM, but that the rezoning would not become effective until the city approves Special Use Permits for them. The hearing for the Special Use Permits will be addressed as part of a separate public hearing in the near future. RECOMMENDATION City staff suggests the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt each of the three attached ordinances. And, that the remaining inconsistencies be addressed in separate public hearings in the near future. Attachments: PROS Ordinance Rezoning Ordinance SUP Rezoning Ordinance Reference Table 1 (Properties to be rezoned now) Reference Table 2 (SUP Properties) Reference Table 3 (30 Alternate Method Properties) Page 6 of 30 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 31 OF THE STILLWATER CITY CODE BY CREATING A PARK, RECREATION OR OPEN SPACE (PROS) ZONING DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, does ordain: Section 1. Chapter 31, Section 31-301 of the City Code shall be amended by adding the following: (w) PROS — Park, Recreation or Open Space district Section 2. Chapter 31, of the City Code shall be amended by adding Section 31- 324.1 as follows: Sec. 31-324.1. PROS park, recreation or open space district. The PROS, Park, Recreation or Open Space District is regulated as follows: (a) Purpose. Private and public parks, recreation and natural open spaces are essential to support community health and wellness, connecting the individual resident to natural and ecological stewardship and appreciation, promoting cultural resources, and fostering the economic vitality of the community. (b) Allowable uses. (1) See Table in Section 31-325 for the allowable uses within this district. (c) Massing regulations. Minimum standards Minimum lot area NA Maximum structure height Single story, 20 feet or less Structure setback from public right of way 50 feet Structure setback from all other property lines 50 feet Impervious area 25% of sites Section 3. Chapter 31, Section 325 of the City Code shall be amended by adding a column to the use table for the PROS district containing the following: 9 For Park, Recreation or Open Space uses such as public boat launches, pocket parks and public recreation centers where customary usage would require more than 25% impervious area on a site, a Special Use Permit may be issued by the City Council for greater than 25% impervious cover. Page 7 of 30 Use Permissibilityl° Parks P Trails P Park Structures'I P Playgrounds P Nature Preserve P Athletic Fields with lights12 SUP Outside tennis courts with lights13 SUP Outside basketball courts with lights13 SUP Outside hockey rinks with lights13 SUP Athletic Fields without lights12 P Outside tennis courts without lights P Outside basketball courts without lights P Outside hockey rinks without lights P Recreation Center14 SUP Multiple Purpose Park Building SUP Golf Coursers P Golf Course Club House SUP Public boat launch P Other passive recreational or natural open spaces P Parking lot ACC Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after publication according to law. Section 5. In all other ways the Stillwater City Code shall remain in full force and effect. 1° P = Permitted; SUP = allowed by Special Use Permit; ACC = allowed as an accessory improvement to an allowed use located on or adjacent to the site. 1 Gazebo, picnic shelter, playground equipment, rest rooms, band shelter, and substantially similar park structures; but not including multiple purpose park buildings or recreation center buildings. 12 6 acre minimum site area. 13 3 acre minimum site area. 14 10 acre minimum site area. 15 80 acre minimum site area. Page 8 of 30 Adopted by the City Council this day of , 2011. CITY OF STILLWATER Ken Harycki, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk Page 9 of 30 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE SECTION 31-1, SUBDIVISION 5 ENTITLED ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, does ordain: Section 1. Purpose. On June 1, 2010 the City Council adopted Stillwater's new 2030 Comprehensive Plan. By Minnesota law the city's zoning map must be consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan's future land use map. A number of properties in the city are not zoned consistently with the new Comprehensive Plan. This ordinance rezones those properties to be consistent. Section 2. The City's Official Zoning Map is amended by changing the properties described in Exhibit A. The same properties are graphically depicted in Exhibits B - E. This proceeding is known as Planning Case Number 2011-04. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after approval of publication according to law. effect. Section 4. In all other ways the Stillwater City Code shall remain in full force and Adopted by the City Council this day of May, 2011. CITY OF STILLWATER Ken Harycki, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk Page 10 of 30 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE SECTION 31-1, SUBDIVISION 5 ENTITLED ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, does ordain: Section 1. Purpose. On June 1, 2010 the City Council adopted Stillwater's new 2030 Comprehensive Plan. By Minnesota law the city's zoning map must be consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan's future land use map. A number of properties in the city are not zoned consistently with the new Comprehensive Plan. This ordinance rezones those properties to be consistent. The current uses within the principal structures on nine of the properties being rezoned are allowed only by Special Use Permit. Consequently before this rezoning ordinance becomes effective, Special Use Permits must be approved by the City Council. If the Special Use Permit for one or more of the subject properties are not approved, the rezoning for those specific properties will not become effective. Section 2. The City's Official Zoning Map is amended by changing the properties described in Exhibit A. The same properties are graphically depicted in Exhibits B - C. This proceeding is known as Planning Case Number 2011-04. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect for the subject properties when the City Council approves Special Use Permits for the subject properties and this ordinance is published. effect. Section 4. In all other ways the Stillwater City Code shall remain in full force and Adopted by the City Council this day of May, 2011. CITY OF STILLWATER Ken Harycki, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk Comp Plan Rezoning Page 11 of 30 GEOCODE 28030201300550059 Address Street Reference Table 1: To be Rezoned (without SUPs) (ID numbers correspond to ID numbers on attached maps) Use note 6 UNIT BUILDING Use detail CONDOMINIUMS & SF HOME Comp Plan HDR Current Zoning PA Proposed Zoning Current or Recent Owner RCM Private 3303020110089 2803020420145 2803020310013 2803020310014 2903020440130 2903020440129 2903020440128 2703020330003 909 4TH 116 6TH 102 6TH 108 6TH 1502 OLIVE 1508 OLIVE 1327 RAMSEY 806 MAIN ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST LMDR CA RB LMDR RCM RB LMDR RCM RB LMDR RCM RB LDR LDR LDR COM RB RB RB RB RA RA RA CA Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Trust UNBUILDABLE YARD LMDR RCM RB Private 2803020420060 2103020420043 107 3RD ST N DRIVEWAY DMU ROW PA RA CBD ROAD TRINITY LUTH CHURCH STILLWATER Private 3303020410027 6303 OSGOOD AVE N NC RCM CA Private 3303020410028 3303020420001 2803020410044 2103020130059 6373 OSGOOD 225 NELSON AVE S ST E NOT OPERATIONAL CEMETERY OFFICE CEMETERY RAILROAD NC INST DMU PR RCM RB RB RA CA PA CBD PROS FAIRVIEW CEMETERY ASSN FAIRVIEW CEMETERY ASSN DOCK CAFE CORP MN ZEPHYR LTD 2803020440091 2803020410115 2803020420018 2803020420017 2803020140060 2803020140071 2803020230048 216 5TH 114 5TH CITY CITY ST N CITY ST N CITY CITY CITY SHORELINE PUBLIC WORKS STEEP SLOPES PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT DMU DMU INST INST DMU DMU COM RB RB RB RB RR RR RB CBD CBD PA PA CBD CBD CA CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private 2803020420006 UNBUILDABLE YARD LMDR RCM RB Private 3203020440023 1951 NORTHWESTERN AVE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ROW BPI ROAD DIASORIN INC 3303020410026 PARKING LOT NC RCM CA Private 2803020410114 PARKING LOT DMU RB CBD DOCK CAFE CORP 2803020420129 2803020130126 3403020220053 PUBLIC WORKS CITY CITY LIBRARY INST INST COM RB RB RB PA PA CA CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Trust 2103020230003 2103020410026 1513 MAIN ST N STEEP SLOPES LDR LDR RB RB RA RA Private Trust 2803020240006 UNBUILDABLE BOULEVARD ROW RB ROAD Private 2803020110012 STATE COUNTY ROW ROW RB CR ROAD STATE OF MN -DOT ROAD WASHINGTON COUNTY Comp Plan Rezoning Page 12 of 30 ID 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 GEOCODE 2703020330001 3403020220075 2803020410024 2803020410025 2803020410012 2803020410013 2803020140055 2803020410012 2803020140060 2803020110034 2103020410002 2103020410001 2103020140043 2103020140042 2103020130047 2103020130047 2103020130059 2203020220001 2103020130059 2103020240011 3403020220001 2803020410113 2103020120001 2103020120002 2103020130066 2103020130066 2103020140011 Address Street Use note CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING PRIVATE NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING NOT OPERATING CITY CITY EXCESS ROW BROWNS CREEK BROWNS CREEK BROWNS CREEK CITY CITY ROW Use detail FUTURE AIPLE PARK FUTURE TRAIL LOWELL PARK PARKING LOT LOWELL PARK LOWELL PARK PARKING LOT LOWELL PARK LOWELL PARK PARKING LOT RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD UNBUILDABLE RAILROAD RAILROAD RAILROAD FUTURE AIPLE PARK PARKING LOT RIVER ISLAND RIVER ISLAND RIVER ISLAND RIVER ISLAND RIVER ISLAND RIVER ISLAND STEEP SLOPES RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES SHORELINE Comp Plan PR PR PR DMU PR PR PR PR PR DMU PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR DMU PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR Current Proposed Zoning IB PROS RR PROS RB PROS RB CBD RB PROS RB PROS RR PROS RB PROS RB PROS RR CBD RB PROS RR PROS Zoning Current or Recent Owner STILLWATER ST CROIX BARGE TE CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RB PROS Private RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RR PROS MN ZEPHYR LTD RB PROS RB CBD AP PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private AP PROS Private AP PROS Private AP PROS Private AP PROS Private AP PROS Private RB PROS MNDOT RB PROS RB PROS RB PROS RB PROS RB PROS RA PROS RB PROS DNR-BUREAU OF REAL ESTATE MGT DNR-BUREAU OF REAL ESTATE MGT Private CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Comp Plan Rezoning Page 13 of 30 ID 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 GEOCODE 2103020130078 2103020130077 2103020130071 2103020130037 2103020140030 2103020420001 2103020420018 2103020420029 2103020420030 2103020410004 2103020310001 2103020320001 2103020320012 2103020320010 2003020410003 2103020320004 2103020240026 2103020230005 2103020230001 2003020140001 2003020420001 2003020140003 2003020140010 2003020140011 2003020140002 2003020310003 2003020230001 2003020310005 2003020310010 2003020310009 2003020310008 2003020320019 2003020320018 2003020240001 2003020340001 2103020440019 2103020440001 Address Street 2013 3RD 1421 4TH 400 POPLAR 1599 1901 1825 1835 MCKUSICK JOHNSON JOHNSON JOHNSON Use note UNBUILDABLE ST N CITY CITY CITY HOA ST N COMM LAND & BLDGS UNBUILDABLE UNBUILDABLE UNBUILDABLE Use detail STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES SCHULENBERG PARK RIVER ACCESS GOLF COURSE BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF UNBUILDABLE BLUFF COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COUNTY TRAIL CITY ST W MAINTENANCE BLDG GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE COMM LAND & BLDGS GOLF COURSE RD GOLF COURSE DR WATER MGMT OPEN SPACE CT WATER MGMT OPEN SPACE CT WATER MGMT OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE GOLF COURSE CREEK CREEK CREEK CREEK CREEK GOLF COURSE CITY LAKESHORE BLUFF BLUFF Current Proposed Comp Plan Zoning Zoning Current or Recent Owner PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR WETLAND PR PR BLUFF PR RA RA RA RA RB RB RA RA RA RA RB RB RB RB AP AP AP RA RA AP AP RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA PROS Private PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER LAKEVIEW HARBOR STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB Private PROS Private PROS Private PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS STATE OF MN -DOT STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB OAK GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER OAK GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OAK GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OAK GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATE OF MN-DNR-LAND BUREAU STATE OF MN-DNR LAND BUREAU STATE OF MN-DNR LAND BUREAU STATE OF MN-DNR LAND BUREAU STATE OF MN-DNR LAND BUREAU OAK GLEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CITY OF STILLWATER Private PROS Private PROS STATE OF MN -DOT Comp Plan Rezoning Page 14 of 30 ID 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 GEOCODE 2803020110036 2103020440002 2803020110032 2803020120107 2803020120297 2803020120008 2803020120005 2803020120004 2803020120007 2803020120003 2803020120112 2803020130085 2803020110007 2803020110006 2803020140034 2803020140071 2803020140055 2803020410125 2803020420066 2803020420065 2803020420069 2803020420067 2803020420068 2803020440096 2803020410136 2803020440056 2803020440051 2703020330002 2803020440006 3403020230028 2803020210006 2803020210014 2803020210034 2803020230007 2803020240013 2803020240094 Address Street 219 MAIN 207 NELSON 523 OWENS Use note ST N TERR PRISON WALLS RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE CITY CITY PUBLIC EASEMENT FUTURE TRAIL CITY CITY CITY ST E CITY CITY TOP OF BLUFF ROAD ROAD CITY STAIRWAY OLD ATHLETIC FIELD BALL FIELD BB COURT CITY ST N WATER DEPT CITY CITY Use detail BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STORMWATER POND STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES PIONEER PARK BLUFF BLUFF FUTURE TRAIL FUTURE TRAIL PARKING LOT POST OFFICE PARK STEEP SLOPES RAMP POCKET PARK STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES TEDDY BEAR PARK TEDDY BEAR PARK ROW BLUFF BLUFF TRIANGLE PARK TRAIL BALL FIELDS STAPLES FIELD STAPLES FIELD STAPLES FIELD TRAIL RAVINE RAVINE TRAIL Comp Plan PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR Current Zoning RB RB RB RB CBD RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB CBD RR RB CBD PA PA PA PA PA CBD CBD RB ROAD ROAD RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB Proposed Zoning PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS Current or Recent Owner STATE OF MN -DOT STATE OF MN -DOT STATE OF MN -DOT Private CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private PROS Private PROS Private PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER TRINITY EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH TRINITY EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH TRINITY EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER STATE OF MN -DOT STATE OF MN -DOT STATE OF MN -DOT CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER IND SCH DIST #834 CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER STILLWATER WATER DEPT CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Comp Plan Rezoning Page 15 of 30 ID GEOCODE 183 2803020240088 184 2803020240010 185 2803020240009 186 187 2803020240076 188 2803020240079 189 2803020240086 190 2803020240012 191 2803020240011 192 193 2803020240078 194 195 2803020240116 196 2803020130153 197 2803020130121 198 199 2803020310119 200 2803020310122 Address Street Use note CITY RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE CITY TRAIL RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE CITY STAIRWAY ROAD CITY RAVINE Use detail RAVINE TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL RAVINE TRAIL RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE UNBUILDABLE Comp Plan PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR Current Zoning RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB Proposed Zoning PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS Current or Recent Owner CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER IND SCH DIST #834 IND SCH DIST #834 IND SCH DIST #834 CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER STATE OF MN -DOT CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private 201 2803020310118 RAVINE PR RB PROS Private 202 2803020310116 RAVINE PR RB PROS Private 203 2803020310121 RAVINE UNBUILDABLE PR RB PROS Private 204 2803020310120 205 2803020310105 206 2803020310103 207 2803020310104 208 2803020310102 CITY CITY CITY CITY RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE PR PR PR PR PR RB RB RB RB RB PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private 209 2803020310092 210 2803020310083 211 2803020310144 212 2803020310015 CITY CITY CITY STEEP SLOPES RAVINE RAVINE RAVINE UNBUILDABLE PR PR PR PR RB RB RB RB PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private 213 3303020340001 214 3303020340067 215 3303020340011 216 3303020330006 217 3303020330009 218 3303020230014 219 3303020220016 220 3203020140001 221 3203020110030 14100 60TH 1372 GREELEY ST N ST S CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY LILY LAKE HOA OPEN SPACE ANEZ RIDGE PARK ANEZ RIDGE PARK FUTURE INTERCHANGE FUTURE INTERCHANGE LILY LAKE PARK LILY LAKE PARK STEEP SLOPES STEEP SLOPES PR PR PR ROW ROW PR PR PR PR RB RB RB BPC BPC RA RA RA RA PROS PROS PROS ROAD ROAD PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER STATE OF MN -DOT MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER HIGHLANDS OF STILLWATER HOMEOW Comp Plan Rezoning Page 16 of 30 ID 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 GEOCODE 3203020130093 3303020220018 2903020410089 2803020320098 2803020230003 2803020230051 2803020230001 2803020230063 2803020230002 2803020230137 2903020140001 2903020110023 2903020130013 2903020130011 2903020130006 2903020130007 2903020130008 2903020130009 2903020120030 2903020120034 2903020120033 2903020110007 2903020110051 1903020120004 1903020120004 Address Street Use note CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY RAVINE RAVINE TRAILHEAD CITY CITY WETLAND CITY 721 GREEN TWIG WAY SURFACE WATER LAKESHORE 739 GREEN TWIG WAY SURFACE WATER CITY HOA OUTLOT HOA OUTLOT Use detail BENSON PARK WASHINGTON SQUARE RAMSEY GROVE PARK FORMER WATER TOWER WATER RESERVOIR WATER RESERVOIR UNBUILDABLE UNBUILDABLE YARD UNBUILDABLE PARKING LOT LAKESHORE LAKESHORE BALL FIELDS LAKESHORE LAKESHORE LAKESHORE LAKESHORE TRAIL WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND POND, SLOPES, TRAIL LAKESHORE, SLOPES TRAIL, PONDS Comp Plan PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR Current Zoning RA RB RA RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA AP AP Proposed Zoning PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS Current or Recent Owner CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private PROS Private PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS Private CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER IND SCH DIST #834 IND SCH DIST #834 CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS Private PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER LENNAR PROS LENNAR 248 1903020410005 249 1903020420002 250 1903020420001 251 1903020410006 252 1903020410001 253 1903020420005 254 1903020410011 255 1903020310006 CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY 256 1903020440016 CITY BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK PARK BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PR AP PROS CITY OF STILLWATER Comp Plan Rezoning Page 17 of 30 ID GEOCODE 257 1903020430040 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 1903020430014 1903020440017 2903020210002 3003020140018 3003020140014 3003020140017 3003020140015 3003020120001 3003020140018 3003020140014 3003020410001 3003020140016 2903020320001 2903020320002 3003020440062 2903020330040 2903020330002 2903020330040 2903020330001 2903020340079 2903020340112 2903020340067 2903020340072 3003020440007 3103020120001 3103020110001 3003020440001 3103020110002 3203020230005 3203020230051 3203020230052 3203020240009 3103020140048 3103020140003 3103020140002 3103020130001 Address Street Use note CITY CITY CITY CITY CREEK CEMETERY WETLAND OPEN SPACE CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY HOA CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY Use detail BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE CREEKSIDE PARK TRAIL WETLAND CREEK CREEK CREEK, WETLANDS LAKESHORE LAKESHORE NORTHLAND PARK NORTHLAND PARK NORTHLAND PARK NORTHLAND PARK CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE MEADOWLARK PARK MEADOWLARK PARK MEADOWLARK PARK MEADOWLARK PARK CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE CROIXWOOD OPEN SPACE SIDEWALK SUNRISE PARK SUNRISE PARK SUNRISE PARK SUNRISE PARK FUTURE TRAIL FUTURE TRAIL FUTURE TRAIL FUTURE TRAIL Current Proposed Comp Plan Zoning Zoning Current or Recent Owner PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR AP AP RA RA AP AP AP AP AP AP AP RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA RA PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER MARYKNOLL HOMEOWNERS ASSOC CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Comp Plan Rezoning Page 18 of 30 ID 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 GEOCODE 3103020130002 3203020240007 3203020240008 3203020240002 3203020240003 32030202400300041 32030202400420053 32030202400540065 32030202400660075 32030202400180029 Address Street 2102 ORLEANS 1401 COTTAGE DR W Use note CITY Use detail FUTURE TRAIL FOURTEEN 4 UNIT BUILDINGS FIFTEEN 4 UNIT BUILDINGS SIXTEEN 4 UNIT BUILDINGS PART OF BUILDING 12 UNIT BUILDING 12 UNIT BUILDING 12 UNIT BUILDING 12 UNIT BUILDING 12 UNIT BUILDING Comp Plan PR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR HDR Current Zoning RA RA RA RA RA RA Proposed Zoning PROS RCM RCM RCM RCM RCM Current or Recent Owner CITY OF STILLWATER COTTAGES PHASE III PARTNERSH ORLEANS HOMES #1 ORLEANS HOMES #1 ORLEANS HOMES #1 Private RA RCM Private RA RA RA RCM Private RCM Private RCM Private 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 3203020240016 3203020240017 3203020310009 3203020310012 3103020420010 3103020430013 3103020430014 3103020320004 3103020320010 3103020320009 3103020240021 3103020240002 3103020210018 3103020240022 3103020210004 3103020210003 3103020220003 3103020220004 3103020220002 3003020330004 3103020210006 3003020310054 3003020330088 3003020310007 3003020310008 2400 ORLEANS 2300 ORLEANS 1675 MARKET ST W ST W DR ANN BODLOVICK BLDG HRA SENIOR CENTER CITY CITY FUTURE PARK OR TRAILS PRIVATE LAND PRIVATE LAND CITY CITY TRAIL CITY HOA LOT OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE SHORELINE TRAIL CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY CITY HOA CITY WETLANDS APARTMENT BUILDING SOCIAL SERVICES RECREATION CENTER PARKING LOT LONG LAKE OPEN SPACE PUBLIC TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL BERGMAN PARK STORMWATER POND LEGENDS PARK PUBLIC TRAIL SHORELAND LONG LAKE NATURE AREA LONG LAKE NATURE AREA LONG LAKE NATURE AREA LONG LAKE NATURE AREA TRAIL HERITAGE PARK TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL TRAIL ISLAND PARK FUTURE CITY PARK TRAIL TRAIL BOULEVARD HDR HDR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR , PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR RA RA BPI BPO LR CRD RCM RCM BPC BPC PROS PROS WASHINGTON CO HRA COMM VOLUNTEER SERV & SR CNTR CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER Private CRD PROS Private TH TH TH CR LR LR LR LR TR TR LR TR TR CR TR CR LR CR CR CR CR AP PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER LEGENDS OF STILLWATER HOME CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEV CO CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEV CO Comp Plan Rezoning Page 19 of 30 ID 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 GEOCODE 3003020320095 3003020320097 3003020320029 3003020320030 3003020310021 3003020320013 3003020210002 1903020330009 1903020340004 1903020340070 344 1903020430028 345 1903020430027 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 371 372 1903020430031 1903020310022 1903020340072 1903020310049 1903020330008 1903020240015 1903020130012 1903020220008 1903020210005 1903020120003 1903020120004 2103020110005 1903020420006 1903020310023 2803020420064 2803020420063 2803020420059 2003020410001 2903020230012 3003020140016 3303020320007 3303020320010 373 3303020320012 375 3303020320033 Address Street 1675 GREELEY 1635 GREELEY 1634 GREELEY Use note WATER RESERVOIR CITY CITY CITY PRIVATE LAND CITY CITY CITY HOA CITY CITY CITY CITY POND TRAIL TRAIL OPEN SPACE CREEK WETLAND CREEK WETLAND WETLAND SHORELINE CITY STORMWATER POND STORMWATER POND CITY OPEN SPACE ST S HRA HALF OF APARTMENT ST S BUILDING ST S Use detail SETTLERS PARK VILLAGE SQUARE PARK PUBLIC TRAIL TRAIL PUBLIC SIDEWALK WATER DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS PARK FUTURE TRAIL WETLAND PRAIRIE PARK BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE BROWNS CREEK NATURE PRESERVE TRAIL PRAIRIE PARK PRAIRIE PARK TRAIL TRAIL FUTURE CITY PARK FUTURE TRAIL FUTURE CITY PARK WETLAND FUTURE TRAIL FAIRY FALLS TRAIL TRAIL PUBLIC AGREEMENT COUNTY NORTHLAND PARK NORTHLAND PARK PARKING LOT APARTMENT BUILDING AND 5 UNIT BUILDING 378 3303020320037 HOA OUTLOT YARD Comp Plan PR PR PR PR PR NC PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PR WA WA DMU DMU DMU ROW PR PR COM COM HDR HDR HDR Current Zoning CR VC TH VC AP AP AP CTHR CCR CCR AP AP AP CCR CCR CCR CTHR AP TR AP AP AP AP RA CCR CCR PA PA PA AP RA RA RB RB RA RB RB Proposed Zoning PROS PROS PROS PROS PROS VC PROS PROS PROS PROS Current or Recent Owner CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEV CO CITY OF STILLWATER NEWMAN REALTY LTD PARTNERSHI CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER SETTLERS GLEN SINGLE FAMILY CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS LENNAR HOA PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS LENNAR HOA PROS CITY OF STILLWATER PROS LENNAR HOA PROS LENNAR HOA PROS PROS PROS CBD CBD CBD ROAD PROS PROS BPC BPC RCM RCM RCM CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER TRINITY EVAN LUTHERAN CHURCH WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER IREISEN PROPERTIES INC IREISEN PROPERTIES INC WASHINGTON CO HRA Private Private Comp Plan Rezoning Page 20 of 30 ID GEOCODE 380 3303020320034 Address Street Use note Use detail TOWING LOT Comp Plan HDR Current Zoning RB Proposed Zoning Current or Recent Owner RCM Private 381 3303020320002 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 3303020320002 2803020140071 2803020140071 2803020110049 2803020110003 2803020110035 2803020140060 2803020140071 2803020140060 2803020140060 2803020140071 2803020140071 2803020140071 2803020140071 2803020410044 2803020410045 2803020410043 2803020110012 2803020140055 2803020140055 2803020410043 1611 GREELEY 1611 GREELEY 601 MAIN 225 NELSON ST S HRA HALF OF APARTMENT ST S BUILDING CITY CITY CITY CITY ST N PUBLIC EASEMENT ST E GRAVEL CITY CITY CITY GRAVEL GRAVEL CITY CITY CITY CITY WETLAND APARTMENT BUILDING AND 5 UNIT BUILDING ROAD OPEN SPACE PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT FUTURE TRAIL PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT PARKING LOT SIDEWALK PARKING LOT PARKING LOT GRAVEL PR HDR ROW PR ROW ROW ROW DMU PR ROW ROW ROW ROW PR PR PR PR DMU DMU DMU DMU PR RB RB RR RR CBD CBD CBD RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RR RB CBD RR RB RB RB RR PROS WASHINGTON CO HRA RCM ROAD PROS ROAD ROAD ROAD CBD PROS ROAD ROAD ROAD ROAD PROS PROS PROS PROS CBD CBD CBD CBD PROS WASHINGTON CO HRA CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER MN ZEPHYR LTD CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER DOCK CAFE CORP NEW STILLWATER PROJECT LTD NPRYCO STATE OF MN -DOT CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF STILLWATER 41. Comp Plan Rezoning Page 21 of 30 Zl 0 z z t- 96 _ EEM QM'Ety RD. ti01�'! sag Ew IABERC wAsy 341 71150 • 80th I MARY LANE AVE. N. 115 r 33? 15 - N. t 266 - 33: 2 ----'" South Twin Lake �246 64 RD. zi T ' t i Sw:SP.:St rGIZI 1.1 twO Ci EN i�> .._./ OEN �� LN rz \ Z OAK EN •-1J �N i ■ rej • wm<r OAK S�'��° JQ z Z \`\ w 261 or. 333 SSE sneaet''`�summER 332 c JiGar£n tq 13- 136 K %LEAGLE a4.) w Sty CM. •_.—i0 uj$ LNUT •� �' 25 tz ¢ " vv,� \,tom: w rw DR. '0' � Cr . O to Tt & GCE : ` tr, \\�D ��rw ct v u� r t lEA 260 \.40U mr/Jc \ry'.41 wV rcr \.z1 I� 1, i( --TA/ r` si Ste, 6( MAL LARD Oro- i CT. jr .J.-_ CT. -" -``%— o 9 � L1%1N-' ,> 12 ?ti� i r I' i) --i 1 -c`o 1/i i '` m ill A 10', Y i ! e�FRRr 267 a 912 ------364 55 9001 v 13 r'E4 126 127 Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Map 1of4 Zoning District Classifications nA-P. Agricultural Preservation n RA- Single Family Residential RB-Two Family Q TR. Traditional Residential `: LR. Lakeshore Residential n CR. Cottage Residential CTR, Cove Traditional Residential _ CCR. Cove Cottage Residential - CTHR. Cove Townhouse Residential ® TH. Townhouse RCM - Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential Q VC. Village Commercial CI40,1 CA- General Commercial ''42 - CBD- Central Business District '•� = BP-C. Business Park - Commercial 240 4»i o ke um BP-O. Business Park- Office 'fr' = BP -I. Business Park- Industrial �( IB- HeavyIndustrial fb- - CRD - Campus Research Development PA- Public Administration PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space Q ROAD Aa April 2011 Comp Plan Rezoning Page 22 of 30 .44t�ll�♦ ir.�tr• ■ • Iwo LI lira la in r _ ALMA ra NV* gig `I11112 imams =nu Nun III rait 011 will minim" 1111 !o'li:i'�1�Iti'r %r I 'y''': .r�tl''' nisi iEwa mum�i'a in r'oek �lllwater Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Map 2 of 4 Zoning District Classifications A-P. Agricultural Preservation n RA- Single Family Residential RB-Two Family ED TR. Traditional Residential LR. Lakeshore Residential CR, Cottage Residential - CTR, Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residential - CTHR. Cove Townhouse Residential - TH. Townhouse RCM- Medium Density Residential RCN - High Density Residential Q VC, Village Commercial - CA- General Commercial CBD - Central Business District BP-C, Business Park - Commercial - BP-0. Business Park- Ofloe ED BP -I, Business Park- Industrial - 16 - Heavy kndustdal CRD - Campus Research Development - PA- Public Administration PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space O ROAD April 2011 4 ti Comp Plan Rezoning Page 23 of 30 1ai. �^1y---r_UNDEN 1 I ST w 5$MV.5-'::-- 235 oe LooKour-.�' 1 1 ' ' z1 189" ' `v ^t Y�yO .�` 1Pa $i MU48ERgY St i ria sr`; •c , t -r RLWG 1 1 { ;-wk -- 195 \ GO rc wEwv fi SUNN Y yy' RICE1 l ,163 - Toi = NI --•{-- F- ---y - �yF - L--37 E L.6 ---1 §rn 211 M.IR i.'� ./ `'��3 ‘ .i 1�MYRTLE t�i-ST -- l I" 2 NfES V-.E� i 2 Cl sc. ^ 1st '•__•;.! kn _} W. '- I .l 1ST. N ST. 1 NI 1 2 �� St,In6 ' i9PK"rit NI 1 t PINE N st I IVE ml 8 �7 �' , I OAK O JJi ST. i �� -r+ 3 W OAK+ ST -� =7 W t`---`--1 W' _if I Lr I l I wu d 1 Jq i up, n1 N 1 1 O 1W. wl 1 1 ,r rl�rr r .t ° ;.... , �^ \, ' ' ,,,sj i i 1 WILLA , RD T' lOG (( l NE i -'rcn 395 87 1 I W. 1 ABBOT 1 ST. 1 �i I- I 1 Of Nt xi -I--L-C-4ILL -r- 15T. 4 E _ 1 CHUi R2F4_ILL_ ST. W. r co , z _II ui I a o wi J , w coo 1 SHELTON �u r !-1 w iw 0f VICTOR! 4 i 66 r tit 8 0' t ut CT tY W E 2 0 Z,.. .....1 z FRONTAGE 1 I l W. ANDER 1SON 7 \SORRY LN j 1R0 IA ue 1----Y— 1 CIR 1PAI CK) w ORLEANS r-r l O 01 " co i} ORLEANS l ' to uu' co r, __] E y� �'{jWIL rLARD\ ` 23 ) u rn' I ' 1 1 1f72 I Al 'W____HA NCO_LCK4tST E_HANJCOC --- L # -iBUR L1N I 1 1 W. Ile., SH ST 4 ... J_-sw OREN i w � a CT.1 z lce RD. O (0 1 1 I i (0 1 1 ST. I 44 26 62nd 1 UPPER ce a 24 67 UP 2 z a 56 HUDSON $TN , vi �Gf 1173, R'�p DkUBU LODE 1 K zi >1 al a, GTO i N_�iST 95 �1 1 ti/(, c� T.L( Mk ( { 7 a1 ui , t +0i 64th +ST. N. ¢ ; kik IL ? R 63rd4.ST. N. i III ti f 1 l 1 i i1 I 1 63rd , ST. j o 0r ' 1 I m A + > zp+16+� 1 i 9 614 St I iiz, i �+ y---'1 ` ,' 61t i "' 1 a12 1 t� I i X /y ST N_1S ‘ •7'4* hT11 N. 59th '` 1 ST. N. Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Map 3of4 Zoning District Classifications F-1 A-P. Agricultural Preservation n RA -Single Family Residential RB- Two Family Q TR. Traditional Residential LR. Lakeshore Residential Q CR. Cottage Residential CTR. Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residential - Chi R. Cave Townhouse Residential TH. Townhouse Q RCM- Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential Q VC. Village Commercial CA- General Commercial CBD - Central Business District nBP-C. Business Park - Commercial - BP-0. Business Park- Ofice BP -I. Business Park- Industrial IB - Heavy Ndustiial CRD - Campus Research Development _ PA- Pubbc Administration - PROS- Park. Rec or Open Space ROAD April 2011 Comp Plan Rezoning Page 24 of 30 Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Map4of4 Zoning District Classifications QA-P. Agricultural Preservation Q RA- Single Family Residential RB-Two Famfiy TR. Traditional Residential LR. Lakeshore Residential CR, Cottage Residential CTR. Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residential - CTH R. Cove Townhouse Residential ElTH.Townhouse RCM- Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential VC. Village Commercial - CA- General Commercial - CBD - Central Business District BP-C, Business Park -Commercial BP-0. Business Park- Office BP -I. Business Park- Industrial ® IB - Heavy Industrial CRD - Campus Research Development - PA- Pubfic Administration - PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space O ROAD April 2011 1 Comp Plan Rezoning Page 25 of 30 EE 0 i t= .....--a80 4 MUq.BERIRY S ' �� zj 189 i i i �� l , fiHQ ct _ Wk....?L CE �_ z I I- ---i % cn Q LE 2215 ST. 1 V 1 H ST. F 202 cot ,___;____*__i_;....,. 1991 203 W2os OLIVE —rit i U)1 l Q l W OAK l Off cn w1 5 PINE r W,Oi ui vN,..----1- —• 1 WI LLA d ! 1 ... v vi L.4.2A,Ly a; ASP 6 ELM; - 1 W. HIC I OR Y 1ST. 152 151 MAPLE r r �■ r z �r Z" '...� 1 • T I CEI\UITLI.1 MEET .. alas r ST.Zs 1 j r z S-"; 13�URE ST. , f NA'g:l 181 LAUREL k 5 186 185 r "188 ST. 1 Cis 1— i 94 y v M,Oe�''`F 72 a 194 1 CRG,P p 2 163 t . 16 i360 .'�b 87 3 i 400 3Ci ter-, 160 66 40'_ 30 is ST._ 1 E .•-'°""rVVIL RD1 ( t 1 ' s_c. VS‘ Vrk 167 ,y r G�0S1 ;y�r ---�~ r � S ! i 3 : ! ! ! i illwater Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Detail Map: Downtown 8 Central Ravines Zoning District Classifications A-P. Agricultural Preservation RA- Single Family Residential RB-Two Family TR. Traditional Residential IR. Lakeshore Residential Q CR. Cottage Residential CTR. Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residential C1H R. Cove Townhouse Residential EmTH. Townhouse RCM- Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential Q VC. Village Commercial CA- General Commercial - CBD- Central Business District BP-C. Business Park -Commercial MI BP-0, Business Park- Office BP-L Business Park - Industrial ® 16 - Heavy Industrial - CRD- Campus Research Development PA- Public Administration PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space O ROAD April 2011 Comp Plan Rezoning Page 26 of 30 j1 Water Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes Detail Map: Dutchtown Zoning District Classifications nA-P. Agricultural Preservation RA- Single Family Residential n RB-Two Family TR. Traditional Residential IR. Lakeshore Residential r1 CR. Cottage Residential CTR. Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residenhal ® CTH R. Cove Townhouse Residential r1 TH.Townhouse 1-1 RCM- Medium Density Residential 1-1 RCH - High Density Residential r� VC. Village Commercial - CA- General Commercial - CBD- Central Business District E3BP-C. Business Park -Commercial BP-O. Business Park- Office QBP -I. Business Park - Industrial IB - Heavy Industrial CRD - Campus Research Development PA- Public Administration PROS - Park. Rec or Open Space ROAD 1 1 April 2011 Comp Plan Rezoning Page 27 of 30 Reference Table 2: Properties to be Rezoned with SUPs Comp Current Proposed ID GEOCODE Address Street Suff Suff Plan Zoning Zoning Land Use Units Use detail Use note Current or Recent Owner 4 2803020130149 215 3RD ST N HDR PA RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 5 2803020420070 209 3RD ST N HDR PA RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 58 2103020330042 1203 OWENS ST N HDR RB RCM RES MORE THAN 4 APARTMENT UNITS 36 BUILDINGS STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB APTS 369 3303020320009 1609 GREELEY ST S HDR RB RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 370 3303020320008 1603 GREELEY ST S HDR RB RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 374 3303020320011 1601 GREELEY ST S HDR RA RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 376 3303020320036 1602 GREELEY ST S HDR RB RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 Private 377 33030203200380041 HDR RB RCM RES 2 UNITS 2 CONDOMINIUMS Private TOWING 379 3303020320021 1656 GREELEY ST S HDR RB RCM RES 1 UNIT 1 COMM LAND & BLDGS SERVICE Private Comp Plan Rezoning Page 28 of 30 377 tll lwater /ME EIR.11 LACE o, .,....o,. Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes SUP Needed Map 'lot 2 Zoning District Classifications L CURRENT ZONING Consitency Rezoning: SUP Needed A-P, Agricultural Preservation r--1 RA- Single Family Residential n RB - Two Family TR. Traditional Residential LR. Lakeshore Residential r1 CR. Cottage Residential - CTR. Cove Traditional Residential CCR. Cove Cottage Residential CTHR. Cove Townhouse Residential 0 TH. Townhouse n RCM -Medium Density Residential r� RCH - High Density Residential ri VC. Village Commercial ® CA- General Commercial CBD - Central Business District r� BP-C, Business Park - Commercial ® BP-O. Business Park - Office r, BP -I. Business Park- Industrial IB - Heavy Industrial CRD - Campus Research Development PA- Public Administration EMPROS - Park. Rec or Open Space r, ROAD Comp Plan Rezoning Page 29 of 30 a 11111111111111 IlililIli STREET- lu i■■a mums -fi ol :I.!IiiI -- - �-t--MULOG RY F 1 --t WPM' .61REET r� —, l hENIEVPIAT2FR-oWEram- o .. --EAST MOM 111111 PAP I PEN STREET 4,4%1. 5 ' of. 0.1%to fit t_ v -41 II .rC \ \ 1 $111wa^ Comp Plan Consistency: Proposed Zoning Map Changes SUP Needed Map 2 of 2 Zoning District Classifications CURRENT ZONING Consitency Rezoning: SUP Needed n A-P, Agricultural Preservation n RA- Single Family Residential RB-Two Famiy n TR. Traditional Residential LR. Lakeshore Residential n CR. Cottage Residential CTR. Cove Traditional Residential - CCR. Cove Cottage Residential CTHR. Cove Townhouse ResideMial - TH. Townhouse Q RCM- Medium Density Residential RCH - High Density Residential n VC, Vrlage Commercial - CA- General Commercial - CBD- Central Business District nBP-C. Business Park - Commercial BP-O. Business Park - Office Q BP -I. Business Park - Industrial _ 18 - Heavy Industrial - CRD - Campus Research Development - PA- Pubic Administration - PROS - Park, Rec or Open Space Q ROAD I Comp Plan Rezoning Page 30 of 30 Reference Table 3: 29 "Alternate Method" Properties Comp Proposed Current Previous Proposed ID Plan Comp PI Zoning Prop Zon Zoning Land Use Use detail Use note Units Address Street Suff Suff Owner 10 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1655 LINSON CIR Private 11 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1605 LINSON CIR Private 12 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1600 LINSON CIR Private 14 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS 0 422 MULBERRY ST E STILLWATER MARINA LLC 17 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1635 LINSON CIR Private 18 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1650 LINSON CIR Private 19 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1640 LINSON CIR VALLEY GROUP LLC 20 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1645 LINSON CIR EQUITY TRS CO 21 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1630 LINSON CIR Private 22 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1620 LINSON CIR Private 23 MDR LMDR RB TH RB RES 2 UNITS 2 1627 LINSON CIR Private 25 INDUS COMM BPC BPI BPC COMM LAND & BLDGS 0 1778 GREELEY ST S SE-TAC 29 DMU MARINA RB CBD ? COMM LAND & BLDGS SHORELINE 0 ST CROIX BOAT & PACKET COMPANY 31 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS 0 514 ALDER ST E WOLF MARINE INC 32 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS 0 STILLWATER MARINA LLC 41 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS MARINA RESIDENTIAL 0 2009 LAKE DR Private 45 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS PARKING LOT MARINA 0 158 CLUB 46 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS PARKING LOT MARINA 0 158 CLUB 47 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS PARKING LOT MARINA 0 PORT OF SUNNYSIDE 48 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? OPEN SPACE SHORELAND 0 158 CLUB 49 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS PARKING LOT MARINA 0 158 CLUB 50 DMU MARINA RB CBD ? COMM LAND & BLDGS OPEN SPACE SHORELINE 0 ST CROIX BOAT & PACKET COMPANY 52 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS PARKING LOT MARINA 0 WOLF MARINE INC 53 MARINA MARINA RB PROS ? COMM LAND & BLDGS OPEN STORAGE MARINA 0 WOLF MARINE INC 119 PR PR RB PROS RB OPEN SPACE PARTIAL WATER 0 Private 120 PR PR RB PROS RB OPEN SPACE PARTIAL WETLANDS 0 Private 182 PR PR RB PROS RB OPEN SPACE RAVINE 0 Private JACKSON WILDLIFE 366 PR PR AP PROS AP OPEN SPACE AREA DNR JACKSON WILDLIFE 367 PR PR AP PROS AP OPEN SPACE AREA DNR JACKSON WILDLIFE 368 PR PR AP PROS AP OPEN SPACE AREA DNR 0 0 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES �atcr THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT DATE: April 7, 2011 APPLICANT: City of Stillwater Planning Commission REQUEST: Ordinance Amendment Regarding Seasonal Outdoor Sales and Vending Carts PREPARED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director BACKGROUND Planning Commissioners have over the years been dissatisfied with the City Zoning Ordinance requirement that vendors and seasonal outdoor sales are required to have a Special Use Permit (SUP). By the very nature of the use, the operators are not tied to the property for which the SUP is issued. They are in ways more like transient merchants than they are like commercials uses for which Special Use Permits are issued. The Commission discussed several options for addressing the transient nature of the businesses and the consensus was that seasonal outdoor sales and vending should not be reviewed as Special Use Permits, but as annual permits. Permits run with a specific business, not with the land. The permit for the business would be approved by the Planning Commission for its first year. That initial permit would expire on December 31st. For each subsequent year without substantial changes, the permit would be reviewed and issued by City staff. The Commission worked through drafts of ordinance language for both vending and tent sales and recommended language. The first draft of the ordinance is attached. RECOMMENDATION If the Planning Commission finds the draft ordinance acceptable, the Commission could recommend that the City Council adopt it. bt DRAFT I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 41, ENTITLED LICENSES, PERMITS AND PROHIBITIONS BY ADDING STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN SEASONAL OUTDOOR SALES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN: 1. Add. City Code Chapter 41, is amended by adding Section 41-6, Subd 1 as follows: Subd. 1. Seasonal Outdoor Sales. Seasonal Outdoor Sales may be allowed as an accessory use within the CA and BP-C Zoning Districts, subject to the requirements of this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision, "Seasonal Outdoor Sales" is defined to include the promotion and sale of goods and/or services, including but not limited to plants, vegetation, landscaping materials, lawn care items, fireworks. Seasonal Garden Centers, a type of Seasonal Outdoor Sales, will be permitted for a maximum period of 90 days, and all Seasonal Garden Centers permitted under this subdivision must cease operation on or before June 30 each year. Seasonal Fireworks Sales, another type of Seasonal Outdoor Sales, will be permitted for a maximum of three weeks each year and must cease operation no later than July 6. The annual Seasonal Outdoor Sales permit may be approved by the City subject to the following. (1) A completed permit application form must be submitted annually (including permit fee) to the Community Development Department. The completed application must be submitted at least 60 days prior to the proposed opening date of the Seasonal Outdoor Sales business. To be considered complete, the application must include the completed application form plus the following additional information. (a) Address of property. (b) Site plan detailing atleast the following: (i) Size of the area being occupied by the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation. (ii) Method of containing operations. Indicate materials and design of the proposed tent or temporary structure, any fencing on the site, and trash containment systems. (iii) Pedestrian and traffic control safety measures. The sales area may not impede pedestrian or vehicular circulation patterns on the site. (iv) Parking stalls. Number of parking stalls being used by the entire Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation must be indicated. The site plan must also include a note describing the number of parking spaces that will remain available to the primary use of the property. Sufficient parking must be available to support DRAFT 1 Page 2 of 5 both the accessory Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation and the primary commercial use of the property. (c) Utility plan. Indicate how water and electricity will be provided to the site. (d) Signage Plan. The annual peiiriit application must include details of all proposed signage. A drawing for each proposed sign shall be submitted. The drawing shall show dimensions and describe materials, lettering, colors, illumination and support systems. The proposed signage shall be reviewed against the following standards. 1. The total number of signs associated with a Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation is limited to three. 2. All signage for the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation must be contained on the subject property. 3. Signage may not be located within public right-of-ways. 4. Each free standing sign is limited to a surface area of two feet by three feet (six square feet total). 5. One banner is permitted. It may only be attached to the tent or temporary structure used for the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation. 6. One sign may be painted or affixed directly to the tent or temporary structure used for the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation. 7. The size and height of the banner and affixed signs are limited to that which is allowed in the BP, Business Park Districts as regulated in City Code Ch. 31, Sec. 31-509, Subd. 8(a)(1) and (3)1. 8. No sign may be erected or installed prior to erection of the Seasonal Outdoor Sales tent or temporary structure. 9. All signs must be removed from the property concurrently with removal of the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation. (e) Signed agreement from the property owner permitting the proposed Seasonal Open Sales. (f) Narrative explaining details including: 1) dates and hours of operation, 2) merchandise or service being offered for sale, and 3) contact information for the landowner, the applicant, and the manager of the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation. (2) The annual permit for the first year of operation shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The first year permit shall be valid through December 31 of the year. (3) The annual permit for subsequent years of operation shall be reviewed by Community Development Department staff, unless there are substantial . changes to the site plan or operations plan, or unless there are substantiated complaints of a Public Safety nature. If there are such substantial changes or Size. The gross surface area of a tent wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of tent wall parallel or substantially parallel to the front lot line. Height — a tent wall sign may not project higher than the parapet line of the tent wall to which the sign is affixed or 20 feet as measured from the base of the tent wall to which the sign is affixed, whichever is less. DRAFT 1 Page 3 of 5 complaints, the Planning Commission must review the annual permit application for that year. (4) An inspection by the Fire Marshal will be required prior to the Seasonal Outdoor Sales operation opening for business. (5) Seasonal Outdoor Sales are only allowed on private property. No Seasonal Outdoor Sales are permitted on public property or public right-of-ways. 2. Add. City Code Chapter 41, is amended by adding Section 41-6, Subd. 2 as follows: Subd. 2. Seasonal Food Vending. Seasonal Food Vending is allowed by annual permit on private property as an accessory use within the. CBD Zoning District, subject to the requirements of this subdivision. For purposes of this subdivision, "Seasonal Food Vending" does not include food vending for events. Event food vending requires an event peiinit pursuant to City Resolution No. 2010-204 and any subsequent revisions to that resolution. The annual permit for a Seasonal Food Vending cart or vehicle may be approved by the City subject to the following. (1) A completed permit application form must be submitted annually (including permit fee) to the Community Development Department. The completed application must be submitted at least 60 days prior to the first seasonal usage of the cart or vehicle. To be considered complete, the application must include the completed application form, permit fee, and the following additional information. (a) Address of the private property upon which the cart or vehicle will operate. (b) Site and operations plans detailing at least the following: 1. Size and location of the area being occupied by the Seasonal Food Vending operation. 2. Picture and dimensions of vehicle or cart. 3. Location of exits from principal building on the property. The vending equipment and operation must not block the exits. 4. Storage location for vehicle or cart when not open for business. 5. Method of containing trash. 6. Pedestrian and traffic control safety measures. The sales area may not impede pedestrian or vehicular circulation patterns on or around the site. 7. Parking stalls. If parking stalls are being used by the vending operation, this must be indicated on the site plan. The total number of parking spaces required of the principal use of the private property shall not be reduced below the minimum number required by ordinance. DRAFT 1 Page 4 of 5 8. Miscellaneous operation details including: a) dates and hours of operation, b) merchandise or service being offered for sale, and c) contact information for the landowner, the applicant, and the manager of the Seasonal Vending operation. (c) Utility plan. Indicate how utilities will be provided to the operation. (d) Signage Plan. The annual permit application must include details of all proposed Signage. A drawing for each proposed sign shall be submitted. The drawing shall show dimensions and describe materials, lettering, colors, illumination and support systems. The proposed signage shall be reviewed against the following standards. 10. The total number of signs associated with a Seasonal Vending operation is limited to two. 11. All signage for the Seasonal Vending operation must be contained on the subject private property. 12. One sandwich board type sign may be permitted if it satisfies the standards found in Resolution No. 2009-xxx and any subsequent revisions to that resolution. 13. One sign may be painted or affixed directly to the vehicle or cart. 14. No sign associated with the Seasonal Vending operation is allowed to be on the subject property when the cart or vehicle is not present. (e) Signed agreement from the property owner allowing the proposed Seasonal Vending operation. (2) Submittal of a satisfactory inspection report of the proposed cart or vehicle from the Stillwater Fire Department. (3) Submittal of a permit issued for the cart or vehicle by Washington County health officials. (4) The annual peiinit for the first year of operation shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The first year permit shall be valid through December 31 of the year. (5) The annual permit for subsequent years of operation shall be reviewed by Community Development Department staff, unless there are substantial changes to the site plan or operations plan, or unless there are substantiated complaints of a Public Safety or Public Health nature. If there are such substantial changes or complaints, the Planning Commission must review the annual permit application for that year. (6) Seasonal Food Vending is only allowed on private property. No Seasonal Food Vending permits will be issued for operation on public property or public right-of-ways. (7) For public safety reasons, all Seasonal Food Vending operations must close by 2:30 am each day. Also, if during large events it is deteiiiiined by the Chief of Police that downtown crowd control is necessary, Seasonal Food Vending businesses may be required to close earlier than 2:30 am during that event. 3. Savings. In all other ways City Code Chapter 41 will remain in full force and DRAFT 1 Page 5 of 5 effect. 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this day of , 2011. CITY OF STILLWATER Ken Harycki, Mayor ATTEST: Diane Ward, City Clerk