Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-04-04 HPC PacketHeritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, April 4, 2011 A workshop meeting will begin at 6 p.m., Monday, April 4, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. The purpose of the workshop will be to review and discuss the City's demolition process. The regular meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, April 4, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF March 7, 2011 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/2011-11. A demolition request for a garage located at 516 Myrtle Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Steve Thron, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/2011-08. Design review for signage on an existing pole located at 14130 60th Street North, Advanced Dermatology Care, in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Northern Sign Solutions, applicant. Continued from the March 7, 2011 meeting 5.02 Case No. DR/2011-12. Design review of a new store front located at 114 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, representing Laura Hoefler, applicant. 5.03 Case No. DR/2009-19. Design review of drawings for review of the the Third Street Ofice Building located at 107 3rd Street North in the PA, Public Administration and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, applicant. 5.04 Case No. DR/2011-13. Design review of signage for "Pub Monique" located at 112 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Michael Hammer, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURN 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, March 7, 2011 A demolition ordinance workshop session took place at 6 p.m. In attendance were John Bracht, Micky Cook, Robert Goodman, Reggie Krakowski, Roger Tomten, Scott Zahren, and Planner Mike Pogge. Mr. Pogge said subsequent to the last session on this issue, a presentation was made to the City Council regarding economic development in which the speaker related the Heritage Preservation Commission's struggle with a recent demolition request; he suggested that the Council consider forming a Housing Redevelopment Authority to focus on housing. Mr. Pogge said Councilmember Cook then asked that the Council consider having a work session with the HPC to talk about historic preservation and historic buildings in residential areas. He said the workshop has tentatively been scheduled for June 7. He suggested possible topics — condition of historic building stock, hurdles to preservation and tools needed to advance preservation -- to bring to the June 7 meeting, noting that workshop sessions are time -limited. Ms. Cook noted that what prompted the Council's request was the lack of the matching grant to do the work for the establishment of the designated residential historic district and discussion about whether there is another avenue to achieve the goal of preserving the City's historic housing stock. Mr. Pogge pointed out that outside of the HPC, there is no strong advocacy group such as the former River Town Restoration (RTR). There was discussion as to the history and current status of RTR. Mr. Tomten said he thought funding was a key question in terms of hurdles/tools for historic preservation and said he thought an impartial advocacy group would be helpful; he said one missing element that the HPC could help promote is that historic preservation is an economic development tool and should be looked at as such a tool. There was discussion about the recently approved facade restoration program for downtown buildings and TIF funding. Mr. Tomten spoke of an article he read about economic development and preservation as related to downtown areas that pointed out a residential component is essential to support an historic commercial district. Ms. Cook spoke of an article regarding the economic benefit of being recognized as an historic place that pointed out that visitors to such places stay longer and spend more money. Mr. Tomten said there has been a recent inquiry by several groups looking into the designation of the St. Croix River Valley as a national heritage area. Mr. Tomten said he would not want to lose sight of the fact that what started this whole discussion was the issue of the need to make some changes to the demolition ordinance. Mr. Pogge noted that demolition review is the first on the list of tools for historic preservation that he has for the June 7 workshop. He said he plans to have a brief summary of each trying to capture the Commission's position; for demolition review, he said he would indicate that the HPC feels it is currently ineffective and would present some options, such as the St. Paul model. Regarding design review, he said the narrative would talk of the need for a local designation district; he suggested it would not take a lot of work to expand the conservation district guidelines to include additions. Other tools Mr. Pogge mentioned included: rental housing inspections, time of purchase inspections and property maintenance code; he suggested those functions, with the exception of the property maintenance enforcement, can be performed primarily by the private sector, with little staff time required. There was discussion of the City's budget situation and lack of funding for additional staff. There was discussion of establishing a designation district and what can be done without such a district; Mr. Pogge 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, March 7, 2011 described the individual property designation process in demotion requests used by other communities. Mr. Pogge suggested the Commission hold another 6 p.m. session prior to the April meeting. He asked for volunteers to assist him in gathering information on the condition of housing stock; Mr. Bracht said he would be willing to work with Mr. Pogge on general/broad brush interpretation of data. The workshop session was recessed at 7 p.m. AGENDA Mr. Lieberman called the regular meeting to order at 7 p.m. Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, John Bracht, Micky Cook, Robert Goodman, Reggie Krakowski, Roger Tomten and Scott Zahren Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Jeff Johnson Approval of minutes: Mr. Tomten, seconded by Mr. Bracht, moved approval of the Feb. 6, 2011, minutes as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. 2011-08. Design review for signage on an existing pole located at 14130 60th Street North, Advanced Dermatology Care, in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Northern Sign Solutions, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Tomten questioned the use of changeable copy for this signage; there were also comments regarding the aesthetics of the proposed sign. Mr. Lieberman moved to table this case. Mr. Bracht seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. 2011-09. Design review for signage for the replacement of existing projecting signs, Shanghai Bistro, located at 324 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. SignArt Co., applicant. Representatives of SignArt and Shanghai Bistro were present. The SignArt representative provided new drawings, based on a previously -granted variance of 39.6 square feet for the Main Street sign; the revised request for that sign is 38.85 square feet. The sign for the side elevation has also been changed, she said, and the plans are now to simply re -face the existing Kitchen sign that is externally illuminated. She said they are also requesting a 5' diameter image of the business logo at the patio entrance. Mr. Tomten asked for an explanation of the materials to be used on the Main Street sign. The sign company representative provided samples of the material and explained the method of lighting that will be used, noting that this sign will be less bright than the current sign which is LED illuminated. Mr. Pogge noted that the request is within the size requirements. Mr. Bracht 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Monday, March 7, 2011 moved to approve with the revised drawings provided at the meeting. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion. Mr. Tomten asked if there are any examples of the proposed lighting style in the area. Mr. Lieberman questioned the proposed signage at the patio entrance and how it relates to the atmosphere of the patio area. The business representative said the intent was to use the existing space at that entrance but soften the look of what is currently there. In discussion, Mr. Pogge noted the patio entrance is considered a street frontage, and he noted that the applicant would have six -months to develop a proposed new sign for that elevation and not lose grandfathered status. Mr. Bracht agreed to amend his motion to allow the applicant to remove the rectangular block on the rear elevation and bring back plans for signage at that elevation for HPC review should he desire to do so in the future; Mr. Goodman seconded the amended motion. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. 2011-10. Design review of Minus 5 Ice Box located at 305 Water Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. John Daly, applicant. Mr. Daly was present. Mr. Lieberman briefly reviewed the previous discussion regarding this request. Mr. Pogge pointed out there is revised language to condition No. 5 related to elevation above the flood plain. Mr. Daly stated since the last discussion, the proposal has changed so the structure is 6' smaller; he said the wrap will be the same, but the entry changed to face in a different direction. On a question by Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Daly said the sign itself is not lighted, but there is some down -lighting. Mr. Zahren moved to approve as conditioned, with the modification as noted by Mr. Pogge. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Letter from Lee Sather, owner of James Mulvey Inn, 622 Churchill Street West, request to terminate Bed and Breakfast special use permit. Mr. Pogge noted the City had received a request to terminate this B&B special use permit as the business has closed. There was discussion about language in the letter that states the property will never be used as a B&B. Mr. Pogge noted that was a requirement of the bank for financing, and said someone could use the property as a B&B in the future but would have to go through the SUP process again. Approval of FY 2010 CLG Grant Application — Mr. Pogge told the Commission the City was not able to obtain the matching part of the grant, so the application was pulled. He said the Landmark Homes project is progressing and said drafts should probably be coming to the HPC in a couple of months. He asked members to contact any owners of the listed Landmark Homes to encourage their participation in the program. In discussion, it was noted participation doesn't obligate a homeowner to do anything other than have a photo and history 0f the home on the web site. Mr. Pogge stated the Commission has been invited to participate in History in Your Backyard on April 3. He said if the Commission wants to participate, he would put together some brochures and be in attendance. He asked for other members to attend as well. Mr. Zahren volunteered to assist at the event. The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. 3 r Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 Re: Worksession: Prep for City Council meeting Message: Attached is a draft of the memo that will go to the City Council for the Joint Council/HPC meeting in June. In addition to the attached material, I expect to provide a little background to the Council on the previous commission retreats and worksessions that lead the Commission to this point. On Monday, I would like to review this material with the Commission and would expect that we would markup the material. Then at your regular meeting in may I will present a final draft of the memo to the Commission for approval. Thanks, Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us State of Housing in Stillwater The current economic condition has placed strains on housing throughout the nation and Stillwater is not insulated from it. Recovery has been difficult and is slow. Housing Vacancy Rate One factor influencing the state of housing is the vacant housing rate. Between 2000 and 2010 the percentage of occupied housing units in Stillwater has decreased from 97.8% to 93.4%. Where this change is concerning, the vacancy rate does not solely stem from foreclosures and distressed properties. One needs to be careful when interpreting housing data since seasonal houses are prevalent in April when the Census is taken since they are used only during the summer and tourist season. Still this trend is concerning and needs to be monitored carefully. Housing Unit Changes between 2000 and 2010 2000 2010 Stillwater US Percentage Stillwater US Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Total housing units 5,926 7,576 Occupied housing units 5,797 97.8% 91.0% 7,075 93.4% 88.6% Vacant housing units 129 2.2% 9.0% 501 6.6% 11.4% Source: US Census Data from the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors The Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors provides a number of key indicators about the Stillwater housing market as a whole. Attached are graphs that represent the Median Sales Price, Number of New Listings, and Months Supply of Homes for Sale in the City of Stillwater form the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. This information includes tradition, short, and bank owned sales. Data from this source is available between January of 2005 and February 2011. Staff would like to acknowledge the assistance of local real-estate agent Cheryl Larson who help identify this source of information and reviewed various MLS listings with City Staff. Median Sales Price The median sales price represents all closed sales in a given month, sold properties only. The median sales price peaked in the City of Stillwater in September 2007 at $299,900 and fell to a low in December of 2009 $209,500. Since December of 2009, the median sales price in Stillwater has gone up to $230,000 as of February 2011. This remains below the January 2005 median sales price of $259,494. Ar New Listings New listings is a count of the properties that have been newly listed on the market in a given month, regardless of what status they're currently in. The number of new listings peaked in Stillwater in December of 2006 at 857 and has steadily been on the decline to February 2010 number of 618 which is the lowest it has been in the available data range ofJanuary of 2005 to February 2011. Months Supply Months Supply compares the number of active listings available to the average monthly pending sales for the last 12 months. The supply of housing peaked in April of 2009 at a supply of 12.4 months. As of February of 2011 it has fallen to 9.8 months; however, this is still high compared to 5.6 months seen in January of 2005. What does this mean? Where the benchmarks are showing signs of improvement for Stillwater we are not out of the woods by any means and still face difficulty in the housing market. If the months supply continues to decreases the real- estate markets will stabilize. We are too early to declare that worse is over for Stillwater; however, we are certainly witnessing some stabilization if not improvements in the Stillwater real-estate market. It is also important to note that these trends do not necessarily hold true throughout the MSP metro area or even in the St Croix Valley. For example, Bayport just witness their lowest Median Sales Price in February 2011 at 167,930 from a high in March of 2007 of $282,500. Due to this, it would not take much for the market to return to a downward path in Stillwater. State of Historic Housing Stillwater's historic housing stock has typically represented some of the community's most affordable housing. As the market has lowered the values of housing throughout the Community, this has placed additional stress on our historic core by providing added competition. Additionally, the number of number condominium/townhome options available in the western area as added even more competition. Until the market stabilizes the Historic Housing stock will be stresses and face challenges. One down side to all of this is if our historic core is left vacant for extended periods then the only alternative some of these structures will be demolish. As older homes are demolished and replaced with newer homes many times they are they are dramatically out -of -scale new with a different style of structure that will affect the historic character of our existing neighborhoods forever. The City needs to understand that once these historic structures are lost they are lost forever and the historic Stillwater charm that everyone loves to point to will slowly erode until it is lost. Demolition Review Current Situation: Currently before a structures over 50 years of age is demolished they are required to have a public hearing before the Heritage Preservation Commission unless the structure is an immediate life safely hazard. Applicants are required to complete what is known as the "nine steps" before the commission will approve a permit. Once the nine steps are completed the HPC is required to approve the demolition permit unless the structure proposed for be demolished is on the National Register of Historic Places (currently 8 residential structures and 64 commercial building in the downtown area are on the NRHP) or are local designated (currently no structure in the City is locally designated). Problem: Due to the requirements of the current ordinance, important structures could be demolished and the current demolition ordinance would not protect the property. Once an application to demolish a home is received, it is generally too late to enact rules that would prevent its demolition. Possible Solutions: Staff has researched demolition ordinances from 37 HPC's around the State of Minnesota. Two ordinances of note that the City could look to are from Chaska and Minneapolis. 1. In the case of Minneapolis, staff conducts an initial review to determine if a structure is potentially historic and if not, staff administratively approves the demolition request. This would expedite clear cut cases and allow them to be quickly approved. Take for example a garage built in the 1950's on a property with a 1800's home. The value of the garage and what it contributes the overall property is very low. Other cases like principal structures and historic outbuildings should and would continue to be reviewed by the HPC before demolition. 2. Both Chaska and Minneapolis have a provision that allows the Commission to impose a 180-day waiting period. This approach of requiring a waiting period is also very common throughout the nation when it comes demolition reviews and allows the community time to search for an alternative to demolition. The Minneapolis ordinance take it one step further and allows the Minneapolis HPC the opportunity consider locally designating the property during the waiting period and if approved by the HPC and City Council the demolition of the property could be blocked. Where rarely applied, it provides a relief value of sorts, which also requires City Council approval to ensure that properties are not locally designated without just cause. Consider authorizing a task force that represents the HPC, Planning Commission, City Council and interested community members to review the demolition ordinance for possible changes to it. Design Review Current Situation: Currently the City has four sets of design review guidelines 1) Downtown, 2) Conservation Design Guidelines, 3) West Business District, and 4) Liberty Village Commercial area. With the design guidelines in place for most Commercial properties in the Community the same is not true for residential properties. The current Conservation Design Guidelines only apply to infill projects on vacant properties and offers very little control over existing properties. Problem: Homes can be completely renovated without any review affecting the integrity of neighborhood and ultimately the property values surrounding the renovated home. Possible Solutions: First, it needs to be clear that not all renovations need to or should be subject to review. Paint colors, roof material, and minor changes should not be subject to review by anyone. In the interest of time, minor renovations should only be subject to a staff review with only major renovations or changes that are not in the spirit of the guideline should be subject to HPC review. Many of the guidelines included in the Conservation Design Guidelines could be applied to both infill homes and proposed renovations. Some changes would need to be made to fully address renovations versus new infill construction. A task force that is similar to the one that created the original Conservation Design Guidelines with representatives from the HPC, Planning Commission, City Council and interested community members should be developed. This task force could also be the same one that addressed the demolition ordinance review. Preservation Districts Current Situation: Since 1995 the City of Stillwater has received grant funds from the National Park Service to conduct 10 neighborhood architectural studies that encompass approximately 1900 properties over 700 acres of land. This is typically the first step to the establishment of locally designated historic districts. As of date, the City has not established a single locally designated historic district, which is usual and sets the City apart from most other historic communities in the State of Minnesota. Problem: The HPC is in a position to complete the work with funding support from the National Park Service and the City of Stillwater. Due to the City's budget situation starting in 2009, the City cut required matching funds to obtain funding from the National Park Service. With our in -kind contributions for these type of projects, the City can expect to receive $2.00 for every $1.00 of City Match. These funds are needed to hire a consultant that has the expertise necessary to complete the project. Possible Solutions: The City Council should consider providing funding in the amount of $7,000 to $10,000 per year in order to provide the required grant match to complete a local designation district. Rental Housing Inspections Current Situation: The City of Stillwater currently does not complete rental -housing inspections. Problem: Concern has been expressed in the community regarding the condition of some properties in the community. There is a community perception that often rental properties are the culprit and that they are not adequately monitored by the City. In 2009, the US Census Bureau estimated that there were 1,562 rental units within the City of Stillwater representing 23.1% of the housing units within the City of Stillwater (2010 actual counts are not yet available for owner own vs. rental units). Where many absentee landowners are proactive and take care of problems, others simply fail or refuse. Without an inspection program, the City has no way to identify or have issue corrected. Additionally, without a program it is difficult to track down owners when there is a problem that needs to be addressed. Possible Solutions: The City should consider creating a rental -housing program. Knowing that City budget is are tight, it will be hard for the City to take a program on and add new staff to complete inspections and support it. One approach some communities have moved is to have private, city approved, Housing Evaluators complete the inspections. Rental housing owners would select and pay the Housing Evaluator directly for the inspection. The rental housing owner would then file an application, a copy of their inspection report and annual fee (typically around $25.00 per year) to the City. The annual fee would cover a half time secretary who would coordinate the program. This would also benefit the police department who would then have a list and contact information for all of the rental housing owners within the City. Property Maintenance Code Current Situation: There is no systematic way to address properties that are in declining within the City. Problem: With our older housing stock, maintenance is important to protect the City's historic housing stock. Possible Solutions: The City Council could consider the implementing of a property maintenance code to address the condition of housing in the City. However, since this type of program typically involves enforcement actions hiring City employees would be required to conduct these types of inspections rather than private companies. However, due to the current budget conditions this is impracticable to institute this type of program at this time. The Council should make it a goal of the City to start this type of program when practicable. Time of Purchase Inspections Current Situation: There is no systematic way to address properties that are in declining within the City and it is unlikely that the City will develop a property maintenance code to address any of these concerns. Problem: With our older housing stock, maintenance is important to protect the City's historic housing stock. Possible Solutions: The City should consider creating a time of purchase inspection program. A program such as this is intended to enhance the supply of safe housing and to prevent the deterioration of the overall housing in the City. Similar to the retail housing inspection, the owner could hire a private city approved Housing Evaluator to complete the inspection. Any hazardous condition would be required to be corrected before the home is sold helping to preserve the community's housing stock. Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 31, 2011 APPLICANT: Steve and Lynn Thron REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a garage LOCATION: 516 Myrtle St W HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 4, 2011 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 1 CASE NO.: 11-11 BACKGROUND Steve and Lynn Thron, property owners of 516 Myrtle St W, are requesting a demolition permit for an existing garage on their property. The exact age of the garage could not be determined and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office; however, the property owners believe that the garage is older than 50 years of age. After reviewing the style and condition of the structure, it leads staff to conclude that the garage is more than 50 years old. Since the garage appears to be over 50 years old, it is by definition considered to have "potential historic significance". Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. 516 Myrtle St W Thron Garage Demolition Permit Page 2 This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish the existing garage. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review... Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the structure could not be determined it is assumed that the garage is over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; The legal description of the property was included in the application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; Photos from various angles are included in the packet. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The existing garage is irregularly shaped and is approximately 70' by 18' garage. The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the entire garage structure is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; A letter from Terry Miller Construction, LLC estimates the cost to renovate the current garage at $50,375.00. The applicant notes that they plan to do the majority of the work themselves with some help from construction workers for hire and expects a new garage will cost approximately $20,000. 516 Myrtle St W Thron Garage Demolition Permit Page 3 (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant has indicated that they wish to build a new garage that will be irregularly shaped that is approximately 92' by 22' to replace the existing garage. Preliminary plans for the new garage were submitted and are included in the packet. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Low/Medium Density Residential and is zoned RB, two-family residential. Once the current garage is demolished the proposed garage would be required to meet all of the current requirements of the zoning code. The plans as submitted would meet all zoning requirements. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant indicates that the alternative would be to leave the garage as is. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant has indicated that they have advertised the garage on Craig's List starting on March 18th. A copy of the ad has been included in your packet. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the demolition permit as presented. 2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes there are alternates to demolishing the garage. 3. Continue the public hearing until the May 2, 2011 Commission meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is May 16, 2011. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Permit No. Demolition Request Permit Fee $150* Receipt No. Address of Project: J 162 GUL5'- al.c.1 h'rIe ,Sihe4 Parcel No.:ZQ30' 031 600k Lot Block Subdivision - -- Applicant: c� "' 0...-. of L. yitri / J1 roj1 Address: / a 7,Vt e Lc-L 121, Telephone No.: 657 - 49/ 75-1A-p Owner if different than Applicant: Address: Telephone No. Type of Structure: & rec.CifL, -- t o k // Age of Structure:'ndition of Structure: Ve � p Intended Use of Site after Demolition: % " r5 fall gazacp. (e a-t-i? ./eriairj au1J -)- c u, ' _ (cut,3,1 it`ll to r - 6/Jeri lads - snow P /61.0) Signature of A ant Date Signature of Owner Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant wilt receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: ❑ Approved City Planner/Community Development Director ❑ Denied Date March 17, 2011 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: We would like to replace the existing garages located at 516 West Myrtle Street. The structure is located on the North East corner of parcel D: Boundary survey and subdivision of part of the south half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section 28, township 30, range 20, Washington County, Minnesota. We would like to demo the existing garage consisting of: • Wood framed construction. • Six (6) various sized units. • In most cases, there is no true separation between each of the units, for the walls do not fully extend between each unit from floor to ceiling. • Five units have dirt floors. • One of the units has a built up wood floor and does not allow for vehicle access. • The roof bows. • Many of the doors, along with the building structure is falling apart and they are not secure. The current garage has turned potential new tenants from renting because of the security and shape in which the garages are in. We feel that in order to attract more prominent tenants we need to be able to provide them with secure garages they would be comfortable storing vehicles and other possessions in. We would like to build a new 7 unit garage with concrete flooring, one for each tenant and one for our use to support residential living. The garage would be built in the existing location, taking in consideration the setbacks need to be followed. Currently the garages are within a foot of the North property line. Alternatives to the demolition would be to fix up what is currently there. In discussions with contractors, it would be a very time consuming and lengthy process. There are so many issues with the roof line, to make the garages even the interior walls would need to be moved. It is basically impossible to rehab. The existing garage is being offered on Craigslist to those interested in moving and re- using the building. Sincerely, Steve and Lynn Thron - • f 4:"":17''s s 7.2 a .. 1011.- 4 w f)77; JJ AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this — day of September, 1991 by and art of the first part, between MSD Company, a Co -Partnership, party hereinafter referred to as "MSD"; and DONALD J. MARLING and MARY BETH MARLING, husband and wife, parties of the second part, hereinafter referred to as "Warlings". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, MSD is the owner of the following described real estate lying and being in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, to -wit: All that part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest toQuartn er of Section 28, T30, R20, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the west line of Harriet St. as the same is laid out w established in the City of Stillwater, where Nor north a ter of the Southwest QuarterSouth Half of oid f Northeast quarter thence Section 28 intersects the same, southerly along the West line of said Harriet St. a distance of 237.35 feet, more or less, to the north line of W. Myrtle St. as the same is laid out and established in said City; thence westerly along said north line of Myrtle Street 251.95 feet to the east line of N. Martha St. as the same is laid out and established in said City; thence northerly along said east line of Martha St. 236.37 .feet, more or less, to a point where the north line of said south half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 28, hence R.20, intersects said east line; easterly along said north line 251.85 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Hereinafter referred to as description "D". WHEREAS, Warlings are the owners of the following described realestate lying and being in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, to -wit: All that part of the South > 1f of the Northeast Quarter of the SouthweQdescribed rter of Section 28, Township 30, Range20, as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the west line of Harriet of t wheret a distance of 22.2 feet southf hofeNa point 3/4 of the the north line of the S1� of said Section 28 intersects said westt line e of Harriet St.; thence south along feet oHarriet Stparallel with the north line for a distance of 71.15 feet; thence west p of said S3 of NE; of SW3 for a distance of 117.'60 feet to a point; thence north parallel with the west line of Harriet thenceeast t Street for a on a line distance of 70.57 feet,of 4 parallel with the north line of said Si of SW; to the westlineof Harriet Street -being the point of beginning. .NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contracted, it is hereby agreed between the parties hereto as follows: 1. That MSD hereby -grants a non-exclusive easement for ingres s and egress to Warlings to the real estate described as follows, to -wit: All that part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of the SouthwessttQuarterbed of Section 28, Township 30, Range20, as follows, to -wit: Beginning at a point in the west line of Harriet Street in the City of Stillwater where the north line ter of Southwest Quarter of said Northeast Qthence Section 28 intersects the same; southerly along the west line of said Herriet et Street a distance of 22.2 feet; theaid south half ofthe Northeast with the north Nor heast Quartere of of sthe Southwest of 2 Quarter of said Section 28 for a distance of 75 feet; thence north 22.2 feet to the north line of the SI of the NE; of SW; of said Section 28; thence easterly along the north line of said SI of NEI of SWI of said Section 28 to the point of beginning. 2. The Warlings grant a non-exclusive easement to MSD for ingress and egress over and across the following described real estate, to -wit: Commencing 22.2 feet south of the north line of the SI of NE; of the SW{ of said S.1ction 28, Township 30, Range 20 at the point where it intersects with the west line of Harriet St.; thence westerly along said line a distance of 77.60 feet to the point of beginning of the easement to be described: Thence west along said line a distance of 40 feet; thence south parallel with the west line. of Harriet St. a distance of 20 feet; thence in a northeasterly line to the point of beginning. 3. The foregoing agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns, and successors -of the parties hereto. :N CCRO _BY PARTY OF THE FIRST PART MSD Company, a Co -Partnership BY: BY: 4 i%` .k 3 bxiibif Page 3 Pages. PARTIES OF _THE SECOND PART I •‘ VI Donald Jf.-Warling - / - 1 , , a A i c L Mary BptH-Wariing e% I i 1 A.--, STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) The foregoing strument as acknowledged before me this" ._. _S day of , 1991, by and - 1. of MSD Company, a Co -Partnership uridtr the laws of Minnesota, Party of the First Part on behalf of said Co -Partnership with full authority so to do. Notary (Public Cc-c .a. July 1 :135 (Notarial Seal) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) day of Mary Beth Warling, an and wife, Parties of the Seconft Part. Ille foregoing 'nst u t was acknowledged before me this , 1991, by Donald J. Warling and LYE J. E(.7Nilf.4 WASIVZIN tisitigs July 13, 105 tiibilgitrairgaerrv""" Notar/ Public 4 Exiiibif Page a of Pages. Some v-)t A-A-N low C,e 1► ►��s 1 ... 1 0 1 1 R ♦ a ♦ , /- / • i • / • 1 / 1 / ♦ 1 ♦ • 9 0 9 9 o 0 1 Terry Miller Construction, LLC 5819 Lake Elmo Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Cell: (651) 983-7781 March 17, 2011 Proposal to restore the garages at 516 Myrtle Street West for Steve and Lynn Thron Base estimate: Doors Extra Framing Roof Miscellaneous Framing Two dumpsters Permit (pending) Total Estimate Owner $31,350.00 5,250.00 2,650.00 4,000.00 6,000.00 950.00 175.00 $50,375.00 Contractor Date New Construction: Approximate cost is $20,000.00 We have existing 2 X 4's and 2 X 6's. We have construction workers that are currently looking for work and will work for $20 or less per hour. The contractor stated that we could frame this up in two days. Garage Units minneapolis craigslist > washington/WI > for sale / wanted > free email this posting to a friend stuff Avoid scams and fraud by dealing locally! Beware any deal involving Western Union, Moneygram, wire transfer, cashier check, money order, shipping, escrow, or any promise of transaction protection/certification/guarantee. More info Garage Units (Stillwater, MN) Date: 2011-03-18, 10:48AM CDT Reply to: sale-kk2we-2272299599(U,craigshst.org [Errors when replying to ads/ please flag with care: (?1 miscategorized prohibited spam/overpost best of craigslist Want extra storage? We have a 6 unit garage that we are willing to give away for someone to reuse. You will need to move it at your own expense. • Location: Stillwater, MN • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests PostinglD: 2272299599 Copyright © 2011 craigslist, inc. terms of use privacy policy feedback forum Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 2, 2011 APPLICANT: Rustad Properties CASE NO.: 11-08 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Advanced Dermatology LOCATION: 14130 60th St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C -Commercial ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE: March 7, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a new freestanding sign for Advanced Dermatology at 14130 60th St N. The sign will go atop the pole that remains from the former Baker's Square sign. The sign is proposed to be an internally lit cabinet sign with a changeable letter message area. The name "Advanced Dermatology Care" is proposed to be in red letters with the website address "ADCderm.com" in black letters all on a white background. The sign will also allow up to three lines of changeable copy area. The sign is proposed to be 14 feet wide by 7 feet tall for a total area of 98 square feet. For retail signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that free standing signs along Highway 36 are permitted to be 100 square feet in size with a maximum height of 25 feet. The proposed sign meets these requirements. 14130 60th St N Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. The height of the sign shall not exceed 25 feet. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: l� a 011 `68 Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 T? 7-V701 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of ail supporting materials are required. AU following information is required . �) 3 b } k _¢_ PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project -- --Assessor's Parcel No. ; - `> > � ° 3 3 - (Required) Zoning District 6P- c- Description of Project in detail Add- /4 l hereby state the fWegoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true��/and correct. I further certifyI will comply with the permit 'fit is granted and uOei/" e04 representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. 1,1. Pro rty Owner _J , i.tS-IA. Representative 17 t- I Ie r A ` i - 4 t, 3 Mailing Address N I-5O (.o 11 Mailing Address i L_'7 T; a-e - _8! .-d City State Zip I tJCCU---)" N ` a. .J)0`_City State Zip 4. � ►'►� il � 9 -,1- Telephone N . (OS - LI HH 21Zy Telephone No. i==5 L- 9C Z Lc Signature equ red) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 (Required) Application for Sidn Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address PO�b �- i / City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Applicant Name Ael/4„, n e. e c( a.R. (A,a 7clot, i P65/ - ,2 yc/ _ 0° ? t{ Address , 4/yi© (� /trsr fie 4f r Cit -1ti/,; C . � / _ State ,�rov Zip Ss/2 Owner (if different from Applicant) Name Phone # Address City State Zip Contractor's Name Name rsr'-4/1,421z.1,-) 5-,5r.‘ /c.z-t=yZ>ill S, 2 C. Phone # 6S / - 1 Z —66,6i Address y 1 . _ City State ) Zip 7 Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: 2 ; hi / if , tr J X = Square Feet 5.4g Sign Height: (If freestanding) /7 Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: %� /G, 4' c / �/mac/L Materials: /uon; nurv) / fy.4"Ara ..66.,? <G Illumination: ` Yes n No If Yes, Type: (- Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Owner Signature (required) Date Applicant Signature Date /`3(z cv i Review (For office udce'only) ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Date By Permit # Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms'Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 A FULL SERVICE SIGN COMPANY Phone: 651.982.6069 Fax: 651.982.2925 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY CARE ADCderm.com Date: 01.29.11 Due: Client: Adv Derm_jennifer File # 11-10 Image Colors: Red/Black Qty. 1 - Double sided pylon sign with 2 polycarbonate panels Size: `7'h x I`f'w 11-1 Gtiot Layout Approval t� By signing this approval I am in agreement that the spelling and design of this layout is accurate and that Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. is not responsible for any errors.This design has been created by Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. and Is property of Northern Sign Solution, Inc. until it is purchased at the established shop rate of a basic or complex logo. Should this design be used for any production by any other party other than Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. you will be invoiced for the purchase of the design.The design will then be released to you to be used in any advertising media you wish. /G1A,(i✓iC/� �Q ci (ST Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 31, 2011 CASE NO.: 11-12 APPLICANT: Shirley Hoefler, HAF Architects PROPERTY OWNER: Laura Hoefler REQUEST: Design Review of elevation modifications of 114 Main St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: April 4, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner N DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of elevation modifications to 114 Main St N. The project calls for removal of the existing storefront and wall sign, installation of a new wood store front including kick panels, metal display windows, wood doors, new second floor windows with raised wood panels, and new fabric awnings. The building is located in the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National Registry of Historic Districts. The building itself is a contributing building to the Historic District and was built sometime prior to 1884. The Downtown Design Manual Guidelines provides direction for storefront facades including requirements for transom windows, display windows, entry doors, and kick plates. The applicant indicated on the plans that they will be using a metal display window system. Since this is a contributing building, some consideration should be given to requiring the use of an all wood frame or at the very least the metal frames should be concealed with wood overlays. This would be similar to what was recently completed at the Stillwater Olive Oil Company storefront, which was also a contributing building. Several products are available from various vendors that could accomplish the same storefront look with all wood products. 114 Main St N Page 2 The plans note a new 3 foot by 5 foot (15 square feet) sign is being installed parallel to the building. This type of sign is consistent in style to a wall style sign. The new sign will be similar to the exiting sign and will have the words "Purefex Salon" and "Natural elements - natural style" cut out of the front panel with the back panel uncut. The letters will be outlined in black. Green leafs will be applied on the lower left corner. The exiting purefex projecting sign approved in 2009 would be removed with the proposed renovation. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 24 feet long facing Main St. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 15 square feet which is smaller than what allowed under the zoning ordinance. Overall the proposal as submitted meets the intent of the Downtown Design Manual Guidelines for storefront facades. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the requests in whole or in part. 2. Deny the requests. 3. Continue the request for more information. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is May 16, 2011 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for May 2, 2011. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the requested building store front facade as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without design review approval by the HPC. 3. The exiting projecting sign is required to be removed when the proposed new sign is installed. attachments: Applicant's Form and packet DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Ply Date Filed: Receipt No.: gg0Je Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Zoning District• .`�,f�� r .%!'Assessor's Parcel No.• Description of Project in detail (Required) ' "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner I4uU �%J�f'1 I'i Representative Fill- isi71i Mailing Address 11 City State Zip 5 Telephone No. Signature required) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Mailing Address / City State Zip ' Telephone No. F Signature 1 ai H 9 !ie ARCHITECT directory HAP ARCHITECTS. LLC 106 EAST CHESTNUT ST., SUITE 101 STILLWATER. MN WM CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER EMAIL: mlke®51-176NecWoorn PHONE:551-351,60 FAX 651430-0180 OWNER PUREFEX SALON a NORTH MAIN STREET STILLWATER, MN 55052 CONTACT: (AURA HOEFLER PHONE: 651A3.5200 FAX 1111111IIII11111111111111111I11IIIHIM L T1.n.1117Tfn.n-rTTrn.ITTrnnTTIT:n•nr TIT n-rr mTTT:.nTnrT:rrTTTTF11. 11.117 11nrT11rnn PUREFEX SALON STOREFRONT REMODEL bbreviati A m PON FLO WIRER {ME HOSE FIREIALvEuisixoT Q R RolleneolEol P. AB PARFARIREATE111 vloOLGILOARK FOOT index to drawings ARCHITECTURAL: T1 TITLE SHEET qt STOREFRONT PLANS A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR PERSPECTIVE NEW date: issue record description: sheet no. HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION IOb.EAST.0 6Fs1N U T.ST BEET HF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS 242111 SHEET ck TITTLE SHEET T1 • z 0 z z 0 L u- 0 0 z � n w ie LL1111 111lti1111.1 ILILLE111111.11,1111JIILLN Llll1I.J WOOD CLAD PIER WOOD CLAD PIER - TYPICAL FABRIC -AWNING WITH 7S1GNAGF PANEL. OAK ENTRY DOOR WITH OAK CASING f"ti:rn(lj 11111 I WOOD -ICLDPANCL NEW METAL STOREFRONT SYSTEM FABRIC AWNING MATH TIE BACKS II OAK ENTRY DOOR IMTH OAK CASING HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION S1 Rl.I7L'..: RlT� 7: !,7; i N.! P N r!! 1 . 3 7 1. 7 2 0 E HF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS 106 1..1 NUT ST. PHONE 651-331-1760 PAPA 631-•30-0140 RCNITECTS.GON emme� ARCHITec+s ei0ESPOT.co111 RUMP. .41 PPPPPP CM!: .,� ..trryr ��� N�N�INN HOD !EXTERIOR ELEVATION A2 1 Li ll l 1 i111 111 II tI111 1 1111 ii1 11: 1111❑11 .1111111111 11111t! 11111111111i 111111,11 HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION P H: e s 1. R 7 1. 7 R R R HffIF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS 1610Eue. HOMER 112,8 SHEET INEOREE•rioli PERSPEC11VE VIEWS: ()PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR %I%lllllllllllllll%IIIIiiIUllii IIIp111gt♦IIIIW111111114gIN1/11 IRI�/r*11,t, I��LgRIN• HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT C ONSTRUCTION 5557..CH55,1,17.5711557 HF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS PERSPECTIVE • MIOUELNOERER 24210 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS: 0 PERSPECTIVE VIEW PR wo» 0 fiL 11n IMm11111JIIIIIIIIIIII 1I11Ii1 11 9 OPERSPECTIVE VIEW 0 0 a� i a I i e f �1t'+t' AN tE /iimmummirnimmmmillinunmmum I.: low-- / ia fur AIM aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ,r�•� ijv 5 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 31, 2011 CASE NO.: 09-19 APPLICANT: Bob Eiselt, Trinity Lutheran Church REQUEST: Design Review of proposed U.S. Post Office and general office building at 107 3,1 St N LOCATION: 107 3rd St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District and PA - Public Administration) HPC DATE: April 4, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner» DISCUSSION On July 6, 2009, Trinity Lutheran Church received approvals to construct a new U.S. Post Office and general office building at 107 3rd St N. On March 19, 2010, the applicant submitted revisions to the original plans, which increased the floor space on the third floor from 1,000 square feet in the original plans to 2,405 square feet. Additionally, the following items were modified on the plans: 1) the number, placement and style of several windows changed; 2) the design and window configuration in the tower was changed; 3) the east facing dormer (NE Corner) was enlarged and a south facing dormer (SE Corner) was added; 4) some site features were modified including adding a stairwell connection on the east side of the building down to the lower level; and 5) a pedestrian access in the southwest corner of the site was eliminated. The building materials and colors for the building mostly remain unchanged from the original plans. The revised plans were approved by the HPC on April 5, 2010 by the HPC. The property is currently part of the City Wide Comprehensive Plan Rezoning project. If approved, the entire property will be zoned CBD - Central Business District. 107 3rd St N Page 2 The applicant is planning to start construction this spring/summer. In anticipation of the start of construction, the applicant is requesting the following modifications to their plans from the HPC: 1. Add an exterior stairway on the east elevation that acts as the second means of egress from the loft area. I have discussed this with Cindy Shilts, the City's Building Official, who confirmed that it is acceptable to have an exterior exit as a secondary egress point as long as they are solid steps (no grates) and are maintained all year round. 2. Enlarge the building on the west elevation 3. Moving the handicap parking stalls along the north side of the building. 4. Revised location for the USPS sign (see sheet All). 5. New window style and layout on the east elevation (A10) and north elevation (All). 6. Changing the exterior material of the loft from brick to the rain screen. 7. Other minor modifications. ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives that can be considered: A. Approval. If the proposed design review plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they could be approved. B. Denial. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Continue the request for more information. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is May 16, 2011 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for May 2, 2011. RECOMMENDATION If the Commission is satisfied with the plans as modified, then staff would recommend approval of the design permit, with the following conditions: 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan sets A through D dated 03- 19-2010 unless revised by the set of plans dated March 18, 2011. All plans are on file in the Community Development Department. 2. No rooftop equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 5. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 7. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 3rd Street. 1073rdStN Page 3 8. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 9. No trash dumpsters shall be located outside a trash enclosure. 10. The City of Stillwater is not responsible for the construction of any new improvements on the site, including but not limited to, the construction of retaining walls, concrete curbs, blacktop, or sidewalks. Additionally, the property owner, Trinity Lutheran Church, shall correct any site improvements damaged by the constriction of this project. 11. A second entrance to the USPS retail area shall be made from the main tower along Third Street. 12. The signage is limited to two directory signage along the south elevation and no signage on the west elevation except for the building's address. All signage shall receive a final sign permit from the HPC prior to installation. The building address sign shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 13. Material samples shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Landscaping shall be installed per the plan prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. attachments: Site plan and Applicant's materials ARCHITECTSHINIF MEMO TO: City of Stillwater From: HAF Architects, LLC RE: Third Street Office Building DATE: March 18, 2011 Attached are the revised drawings for the Third Street Office Building that reflect the following: a) Required 2"d exit from loft (exterior stair) b) West plan enlargements c) Site plan revision reflecting handicap parking stall relocation 106 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Ph: 651-351-1760 Fax: 651-430-0180 www.hafarchitects.com 3 MICHAEL EFLER 0 F- F- 3 (I) 0 0 (J) LDRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET AS 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Li LANDSCAPE PLAN AR 1 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 2 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 3 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 4 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING z '3 z a a a z zz z 0 a 0 0 a 0 ISSUE RECORD SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 0 e. 9 < 4 < < > > > > _1 0_ W Ld W 111 Lo J J J J .., >WZZ W"W CC a re CC J41.1'10000 IEEEEE X J 11 Li , L- -,>i-L< 0. - 8 ,,<`' >iRu ,,'L" ., J a W 41 W W W 0- N VI / ug) ID 0, .- - I- < 0 < < < < < < < < LiJ 19 2 0 LU 0 0 DIRECTORY 0 1— LoJ El W CC h- W 5 J M Li [in" 0 I 0 'A 6 . i,J .z., ,,2,0-,z 1 0 ..__ .0 0w2 rCi wi. I -um 2 —m ,u2 ml F- 'ci' 4W, (001 ,." ',-2.. 0 25, I,. 0 0., Id 1- Id 0 a. ;ITEN4 -- ABBREVIATIONS dffl fflh HE2itgo 2 0 _J • • 55..:•-• - • . , • 10. . g (7-1 yds, co x,, 5,090,50alo, s005 • 01.05 '5, 00 ,05,51-5.80 OODO :50,11,54510 03,013531-6,0130 :s9xtrma 03.53. 655,555,5,,A, dom., ,50,55,55,a6,555,Vapy,y55,0 :5,5ry SITE PLAN NOTES -EXCAVATION 5U0l.ONIRAGTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOW NG IN ADDITION TO THAT SHOYN ON THE PLAN. A. SILT FENCE AS REQUIRED BY CITY GODS B. TET!'ORARY ROCK ENTRANCE. G. REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4 CONC. CURB/SUTTER REPLACEMENT AT AREAS OF DEMOLITION FOR UTILITY'S AND THE LIKE (IF. HOUSE DRIVEWAY -ETC) D. PROVIDE 6' SAND CUSHION BBFATH FLOOR SLAB. E. PROVIDE 6' A66R16ATE BASE UVDER SIDENIALK F. REGARDING OF TOPSOIL FOR FUME ELAGIC DIRT LANDSCAPE FINAL GRADE G. EXCAVATION 4 BAGIQ=ILL OF BUILDING- HAUL OUT EXCESS MATERIAL H. CITY OF STILLYIATER SEYER 4 YIATER PERMIT AS YELL A6 CITY OF 5TILL)MATER RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT. I. MY / ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AT UTILITY AREAS. L ANY SAM GUTTING OF BOTH BITUMINOUS / CONCRETE PAVEMENT. K REMOVAL OP ANY BINMINOU5 / OR CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS YELL AS CURBS. L 6' X 4' YET TAP OF EXIST. 44ATERMA N. M. 4' D.IP., GL. 52 PIPE ALONG WITH 90' BEND i LNIR.ANSE WZ• OPENING. N. DISGOMECT CORP. STOP AT MAIN. O. CONNECTION TO EXIST. SANITARY SEI'ER INSIDE RA•l P. 4' P/C. SCH. 40 PIPE AS YELL A5 CLEAN -OUT. O. PROVIDE BAC:FILL 4 COMPACT UTILITY TRENCH WITH ON -SITE MATERIAL R. THE SANITARY SEVER 4 Y(ATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTAI I Fr) INTO 9RD STREET. 5. THE EXISTING HOUSE YA1E2 SERVICE SHALL BE IMtESTISATED AND ABANDOWO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECT° LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 9 T R E ET B 11 1 T E A LAKE fiLMO, MN 55G42. PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 1 -490-0 1 90 WWW.HAFARGHITEGTO.GOM STREET OFFICE JOLENE I oraror °CETI, THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIEICATON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED ST HE OR UNC.Eli MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT AM A OULT LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER ENE LAwS Of THE STATE OT MINNESOTA. W MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ OB-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: To2 DESIGNS SNOWS AND SESCRIEGO HEREIN TITERELS. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNED BE COWED. OUPITCATEO Oft CONHERCHL, EXPLOITED. IN WHOLE OP IN °APT. WITHOUT CYPRESS wroirro PERMISSION or HEE ARCHITECTS. THESE •RE ATAILASTE PEW LITTSCS REVIEW AND EVALUATION BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS, A.S.,. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE P. COPYRIGHT HAP. ARCHITECTS 20138. AWL RIGHTS RESERVE° ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION s,+cT INFaRnnTlaN: ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AS1 SITE PLAN EL 748.-0- /EL. 746-0. r, /PARKING LOT. CONSTRUCTED 7 BY OTHERS 7 107 THIRD AWN LEVEL FLOOR PLANK-749 LOWER LEVEL TOP OF SLA8-738 / \ 77 \ EL 739 -0• EXISTING BUILDING s EXISTING BUILDING 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN KEY NOTE LEOEND L excoemnos an SRNS 01441. MO, 17..T.100 LAIN CAP AP TO LOY EITAADANDS. 2 &LAVAS& DA AAA DWI RHOS DAT 100 1.1e I OP 2.10 TO GATT STANANN. MD INN OWLS PAD rat NY DNA& 0. IDLAVATION C00106LT00 514411 NOV= IDS DAN PSIS TO DAT 14100E MISR PTAH G44.44416/t 4 DPP/AV...TON Oa 1144Ct SHALL MOAN 10IY MASA NICOL& YENS NNW ISOM TO MLA SOK 29.WAL19112 AND DAL NANA DDT. ANNAN MIA Lir & LIND 81141 ADM IS PDLLGVN• ISAININSBOADOTS1 6. ANINOTON INDAVATION 4 REMOVAL & *AS 292.29 0.111912CAL 019011129 DUAL T.V. OSOLONNLT 2 MOM OND0111121 T. 115.1 mar wow Lir !WM=0101100000 WI PION DAVION. 0. 11.1011644.114111010141- UNIT( CO. TO ISNAGIST WAIN I 290129 TO VW POPOL AS WIER IMAIS216. 10. MDT COWAN *ALL DISCANDI •AIS L11/1 U. NTS& LOCATION 0 r IMO 1.1141- war. DOLT LOCATILD ISIMUTY CO. 12. ENAVATION CONTRAOTED TO 1,17/00 46000*11 PIM TO ANN LIS ▪ INLAWATAGNITISAGTOR 0/114.1. FALAION s/ AAA& MO MDR LANDSCAPE DRANAIN PAT. AL &SANT COMPACTON TO PNOVILe DOAN ILE /4/ NNW • SRAM& 1110.000.00NA1N TO INF AT IMAM 0.60601! PASS ▪ 6.4DSLAS WOOD 0171460101.0 PAL Mr NAM& n. COMMIT 011211 2 COMM 5012ALIC 2 MT 099049.19.1202 IMMO P201 rpentme NO RAND ARRAIDED • 411.00% 11015 1711.10 P1A.N TO neer AT pen NAPA PLY. 20. LAJOSCJPG /MA 2. RAM= 9. CATY C..2929191.12910 L02 NW GUM 191211. num 15•2081..6111S FLAN. • ZI00460212102211999 TO 1910922 WM SWAM LIN- ARAL! ADAK All DISTINNO AND& 10NAVA INDLININDORIAL PPLISISTY MAW NOM POJIDATEIK 51#113LIDV MJ.6gaP 04 MOM 140.1.25 A - AWN= 29211119241212 0-044*00 12199541.22921012' nei c - 6A00IN111405.RY • MALT P.21111A -11AL00TION SLYER P - POLKA PINISA • - LIWP KONA 1....AL - DIONION AMY 112201212. J - 4004000 K - PARK MEN 91,1 PERENNIAI-S LE6E10 - GAT 112199 00 04 - ZAN= camp* LL 912 LIRAT MAIM PO. 1110100400 HAF AR H ITECTI HOEFLER ARCHITECT° LL 1 2 44 5 5 5 °TREE SUITE A LAKC ELM 0, M N 0504 PHONE 651-a 5 1-II6 FAX 55 I-43 0-0 B WWW.HAFAR0HITE1ST8. 5 0 1 PROJECT: THIIRID el -GREET OFFICE /31-.13 R-HiRo MYRTLE 1,11ETIE-1E51,1,.. 13ES/IEW PERSPECTIVE: I HERESY CERTIFY THAT rws PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED ST DE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AID THAT AN A OU, LICENSES ARCHITECT GIVIER THE LADS Dr THE STATE or MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 2 42 1 0 08-049 f.IMH M G H HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE 0 NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SkOwN AN° OESCRISSO HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL OP/THINGS. ORADVES. AND MODEL DUPLICATED OR COTINERCIAL, EXPLOITED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. wrHouT EXPRESS wqrrrtx PERMISSION or HAr ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE ARAM/ISLE FOR UNITED SEVIER/ AND AGENCIES. VENDORS AND orricE PERSONNEL ONLY IN D. COPYRIGHT I.I4E ARCHHEETS 20126 ALL PIGNTS ves,,Et ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE PLAN Li Nr.)5GAF'E PLAN HAF A F2 Cl IA I -r EE C2 1- E3 HOEFLUR ARCHITECTS LLO 12445 55. 0TREET a LI tTE A LAKE ELMO, 4H 55042 PHONE 651 -as 1- t /60 FAX 65 -4900 ISO WWVITHAFAROHITEGT0.00M PROJECT: STREET OFFICE Ell_OCE TH I MYRTLE 51-11_1-VJATEIR, MINNESOTA, fgEVIEN/ PERSPECTIVE: HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PHIS PLAN. SPEDMICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DT NZ OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANO THAT I AN A DULY LICENSED ARCNITCCT UNDER THE LAWS Or THE STATE OT MINNESOTA Off- MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MOH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE' THE DESIGNS SHIM". .10.1 0 DESCRIBED HEREIN TNEREOP, ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED. DUPLICATED DR CUNNERCIALLY ExPLOITED.. WHOLE OR TN PAM WITHOUT [TARE. 'ARMEN PERMISSION OP NAP ARCHITECTS. EXERT ARE AY...MABEE TOR LIMITED REMO. ANO AGENCIES. VENDORS AND OTTICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN TTT CDPYRTCHT NAP ARCHITECTS BOOS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 1 RCHITCi1)RAL RENDERING N.T5. ,....-, . . ;- -----; 1 r, r-----,',.•-•, 1, , .•,. = = ,, '••••=1 .:17-7-,4 1,-, ,,,==_,.. P'''''',' i 1 1 • i HAF ARCHIT5CTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LL3 13445 55• STREET eulTE A LAK ELM 0 , M 1,1 55 042. RuONE 651-S51-1760 FAX 65 1-4.213-131313 WWW.HAFARGUITEGT3.00M PROJECT: TIMIPEO STREET OFFICE el_013 1-1-11830 INIVIPTLE ETESION PPEVIEW PERSPECTIVE: I Ht.. COPTIC, TelAT MI, PLAN SPEOIMEATION NENcorT wAS ST NE On .0E8 Kr DIRECT SPPERNSION AND SNIT I AM A Dv. mGENSED ARCHITECT NNOES uors Or THE STATE Or MINNESOTA. OW- MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MGH ( HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE orsiGNS SHONN AND OESOnis. HEREIN THERE.. A. ANG cANNOT COPIEO. OuPL/EATED commercIALLY CrILOITEN. IN soliOLE FART var.. CPPEGI WRITTEN PERMISSION Or 11. AlacHITE.S. THESE ARE •rAmAaLE rOP Uma. Peri. AND EvAL.N. 88 ciJENTS GONSULTANTS. cONTPAGTORS. AGENCIES. vENvo. AND OrrIEE PERSONNEL ONLY IN AGGEMPANGr.r. NOT,OC• coPyPIGHT ApONITEETs ZOOS ALL MONTS ISSUE DATE DESCITIEmaN ZTRECrii'FROU'RAL RENDERING AR 2 HIIEGTURAL RENDERING HAF ARCH I lr C ir £3 HOEFLER ARCHITECT6 LLO I 24.4 5 55. STREET El 1.11TE A LAKE ELMO, MN 5504.9 0I40N E 65 1 -a 5 - 760 FAX 65 I -490-0 ISO WWW. HAFAR GHITEGTH. 00 M PROJECT: TI-1,20 STREET orr-AcE T3-111RID S. MYRTLE STILLWATER. NIII,I,IESCITP. IDESIGN FREVIEW PERSPECTIVE: I ...Efatre CERTIFY SNAP NIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PARHAM. SY FRE OR UNDER MY ONIAN SI/AE.1510N NO THAI I AN A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNION NE LAWS or NE STRIC OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SHER. AND DESCRIRED HEREIN DURLICATRO 011 COMMERCIALLY EXPLOIT.. IN wAIDLE. OR 1.4 PA, WITHOUT NPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RAF A....IrrELTS. NESE APC APAILPOLC ro. AINITGO REVIEw ANO NARRATION BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, CONIPACTORS. RUNE.. VENDORS ASO ornoc PCPSINNEL ONLY IN .0 COPYRIGHT RAF PPLLXIINEYS SCOM All RIGHTS PENNED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION AWDWIFEETURAL RENDERING AR 3 RGHI7EGTURAL RENDERING HAF ARCHITECTS HOKFL5R ARCHITECTo LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 "' S T R E E T s U t T E A LAKE 6 L M O, MN 55045 P N 0 NE 6 5 1 - S 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 1 -490-0 1 BO WWW.HAFARGH ITEGTH. GOM THIRD Ea HEREBY CORP, THAT THIS RUH. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY PRE ORDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICCHSED ARCHITECT SPACER THE LABS OF IKE STATE CIF MINNESOTA MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑B-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A THEREOF. ARC PROPRIETARY AMID CANNOT BE CIDPIEO DOPAILATEO OR COMMERCIALLY EXPEDITED.. YMCA( OR IN PART. WITHOUT CYPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HA° 0 COPYRIGHT HAG AaRLITEcTs 20013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 51iEEr I ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 4 ARGHITEGTURAL RENDERING k.200 30'0' B'0' 2'A' ' '' '' '41' "I1F4UJI r AM F FAOSIM MIA N NNE' II RI FF DRAIN DROP 4 ® O e 1 J' SANITARY CAPPED ' II / FOR FUNRE SANITARY /,' / , — A EL7MM Al �sl►7 11 '� M® ENS Z-1' I 14'S' 1f-0• 1 4 9 ,k'" TINE INDICATES DRAIN SYSTEM ') 1J �•�� I� I I ROOF DRAIN OR �". I „ ���O ■ •��S�1 --- II II ■ Z a 4 - - UP • 12121.1ILIN111111 O \ • 1\ NAL1 OWAY / U® O / UNC I I EL 7JB'0 R N 1VI O31 -- F.O. 104 SPRINKLER -'11� A Lr }PD. O F T , ,��� •wDOs /1 9 II I. ital. (--1) 111' ■ yi DV ROUE CRAIN PROP 0 O II 8 - �p 641001d' I L WAiE OOIE' I O I' ► 1 I 4 EL IJBA Aar Aar ■ .. �- _ SUMP ROOM m R->ND ELEV. EQUIP. EL 735-0' /! ROOF DRAIN DROP --A®' ' I M, // / • I L.)a0'-0' J / I "O' O O O lia L EAT OR+ �I y ALUMF ME TYPE LI]96 p // -- JR.0 A IIBMNIM.�.IMI/ / 4 ��4F"".//// LOOP r '� / / d'."..".'�."."".'A A / // STORM ROOMAREAS BOMA STANDARD CONC. WA K ABOVE //� 1 lial -- /// J • •/ FF. COMMON 969 1 N T % ./ / / ./ / / / / / / / / / AREA G I. / �, �....1. WILDING SQUARE FOOT PERCENTAGES STEPS ABOVE UNITC 46.6Be UNIT 534. '/ N L A. .. A ..10.1 TIEN(ABLE BUILDING AREA (SALES SQUARE FOOTAGE( I UNIT 180955F. UNIT IT 2059.5 S. F. 5'-0' 35'2' iBJ 14'L' SL' J'0' fi,'A' HAF A R C H I T E C T 1 H OEFLER ARCHITECTS Lt. 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 'II S T R E E SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MH 5504 PHONE 651 -as 1- 176 FAX 651-490-013 WWW. HAFARGH ITEGT8. 001 LWATEIR, MI IN NI CITAo� STIL 11SE. RATIFY TAT AIM REIFIRTON RIMER WAS PREPARED BY ME DR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AM THAT I AN A LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER rnE LAWS ILL THE STALL OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑0.049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND :DESCRIBED HEREIN INC... A, TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPHICS. ANC: NOD, THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT BE DUPLICAILD OR COMMERCIALLY [PFLUG... WHO. DP IN FART. WITHOUT EIPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE F. REVIEW AND EVALCATON ST CLIENTS, CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS, AG[NCIPS. VENICORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCOROANCE wITH THIS NOTICE. CORYPIONT HAF ARCNITECTS 200H. ALL RIGHTS RESERVE: ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A2 LONER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 532'•1.-0' MICHAEL HOEFLER I c0 0 • • co .‹) b L"J r—r — ul SLOPE E fi • / �4, 27'3VI �z s \ / l Ila' L 4 02 rc SLOPE zaz y e: 0 0 L- R- Q ‹) III Ip SLOPE M 21 t B-it 1l2' u 2 ALUMINUM FRAME TYPE A 1- 0 SLOPE 12:12 J IO' 0 0 (p m 3 0 2 3 3 2 0 m m A 0 3 2 D 0 0 -9 rro— xD Dcd 0 7C- A PIA) m m m PiCJ r p n 3 m p= 0 th s -� 100) 1200i. 0 ROOF PLAN KEYNOTES 1. ROOF DRAIN 2, S. METAL ROOF GUTTER SYSTEM S. OVERFLOW SCUPPER d. METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF S. DUTCH HIP G. SLOPED FIAT ROOF 1, SLOPED DORMER ROOF A. AIR CONDITIONER UNIT r 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 1 L' 0 0 O J 0 00 0 HAF ARCH ITCT HOEFLER ARC$-IITECTO LL 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 "I 9 T R E E EIUITE A LAKE 5 L M C I M N 5 5 C 4 PHONE 651 -351- t'76 FAX 65 1 -420-0 1 WWW. H AFARCH I TEOTO.001 DICE ISLoo -TIRO s STILLWAER. ME IiAns EsoTA CIESIGE.1 REVIEW WAS PREPARED SY ME OR UN°, MY 01,, SUPERVISION ANI THAT I asi A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDED nIs Laws on SHE STATE OE MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 09-049 TAHEHH ET MMH MGH HPC EUEIMITTAL PACKAGE INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAwINCS. ORAPHICS, ENO MOOEL THEREOF. APE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED. DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY issnLonco. WITD, UR IN PA, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MAE ARCHITECTS. THE, APE AvAl4SLE IN.,. REVIEW AND EVALUATION SY ...Ewa, CONSULTANTS. CONTR•GYORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WNH THIS NODE, V COPYRIGHT RAF ARCHITECTS 200SA, RICHES RESERIMI ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: ROOF PLAN A6 LOFT PLAN 5/32..1'' EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF 4 TEOP OF ROOF L 120'.0 (r15A') 4 TOP OFW II EL. ILO'-4 (159'A'I Y PANP JOWi 4, PA FI JOINT EL. 104.-81. (756-01 A TOPOF'Y1A521 NEL Y EL. 10P-0 1145'A') 6 TOP OF 0000000 Y EL 9361' (T42'4 ) TOP OF WAI I ICONC 500000Y) EL 9260' (141'4311 TOP OF IOWFRFI OOR EL 0960' (i30'-0') 1. MODULAR FACE BRICK WITH 1/2' RUNNING BOND WITH CONCAVE JOINTS 2. NIA 3 NIA 4. 2' LIMESTONE ROCKFACE EDGE CAP 5. RAIN SCREEN PANELS WRN OPEN JOINTS COLOR TO BE SELECTED 6. PRERNISHED METAL FASCIA 1. Ili' COMPOSITE PANEL SOFFIT B. PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WITH SEAMS SPACED 11•361' 0 G WITH ASSOCIATED FLASHINGS 6 TRIM 9. ANDERSON CLAD ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW -SEE SCHEDULE 10. ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT. SEE SCHEDULE II. STEEL BEAM CANOPY SYSTEM WITH TIE -RODS 6 BRACKETS SEE SECTIONS 6 DETAILS 11. MIN SCREEN PANEL JOINT - TYPICAL 13. DASHED LINE INDICATES WINDOWS LOCATED WITHIN AREAWELL 14. CAST IN PUCE CONCRETE STEPS 15. CASHED LINE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOTINGS • SEE FOUNDATION PLAN 16. COMPOSITE PANEL FASCIA 11. RETAINING WALL (FACE BRICK) IN FOREGROUND 6 OR BACKGROUND IS. STEEL PIPE GUARD RAIL 6 OP HANDRAIL 19. APPROXIMATE 3RD STREET GRADES @ SIDEWALK 20. BRICK COURSING STARTS ©EL. 732'-6' 21. STONE SILL 22. BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 23. ANCHOR STONE RETAINING WALL 24. APPROX. STREET ELEVATION 25. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL 26. PATIO 21. SLOPED LAWN -SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 20. CONC. EXTERIOR STEPS 29. ROCKFACE CONCRETE MASONRY roLCA 30. FACE BRIC0MASONRY CONTROL JOINT 31. SCREEN WALL CAP CON61. - 050010ISHEO METAL FLASHING SLOPED OVER TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 32. TRASH ENCLOSURE CLAD IN RAINSCHEEN TO MA ICH. BUILDING 33. my OF STILLWATER CONCRETE CURB (BY 0INER51. 34. CITY OF STILLWATER BLACKTOP (BY OTHERS) 35. 5' CONCRETE SLAB WIBROOM FINISH SLOPE FLOOR TO DRAIN AWAY (TO LOADING AREA) 36. CITY OF SMLWATER RETAINING WALL 31. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCONCE 36. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 39. OVERFLOW SCUPPER 40. 6' STEEL GUTTER WITH CHAIN DOWNSPOUTS TOP OF TO}NFR ROOF A TOP OF WAIL EL 123-3111121-31) • TOPy0 WAI I A EL I10'-0'I16T-0') Y �QPOF yy81,1 EL 11 a'.4'1T63'-0') ANFLJ0INT A EL. 112'-0'1261'-0') Y TOPOFWALL A _VAIN IFVFI WOW OPFNING A EL 100'd (15r-0') --eEL100T EL AN104'-0' (T59'-0') _TOP BF M4011R0 EL 103'-0'(153'-0') T(1POF MAWIFVFI --EL.9T0L 004000 IN0 4 __pANEL,Lppp EL. 93'-011142'U'1 TOP.83LOWERI FVFI F100R 4, EL. 13,6.1730'-0'3 _yLPF,44.1 'FLODR FOOTINGS A ARCHITECTS H06FLER ARCHITECT° L1-0 13445 5 5 F S TREET SUITE A LAKE 6 L M 0, MN 55042 P H O N E 6 5 1 - 3 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 I -420.01 00 WWW. HAFARGNITEGTH .G ON THIRD. STREET ERIRD GMYRTLEF"FICE au.. I HEREBY CERT, THAT,. PLAN. 8.686.8.66nos OR REPORT V MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑0-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE. DESIGNs SHOwN AND OtscRIRED HEREIN THERE,. ARE PROPRIETARY P.40 CANNErr SE COPIED, PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PER...SION Or Hcr ARCHITECTS. THEsE ARE AVAILABLE AA LIMITED REvIEW ANO EVALUATE. BY CLIENTR, CONSULTANT, GONTRACT0Ps, AGENCIES. VENDORS AND 0rP,CE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION $HEFT NFORMATION: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A8 IOR ELEVATION a, TOP OF TOWER ROOF EL 13r-9' (186'-9') A TMnFWAII A TOP OF WALL EID18 WA11 EL 114'J' (163'i') TYPICAJ TOP OF INN 1 El_ 110A' (759,) J. TOP OE BRICK EL 4I150'<') 22 EL 02220WEVFLNTw nPFNINGs_ 090" ]Sr-0') A lOP OF RRLCK A TOP OE % WTI TI q EL I0008 (149-01 I OWFRLFVFI WNDOW0020}0L_ EL98U'p4r.0 THIRD STREET TOP OFI (YNFRIFVEL F0008_ TOP nF LOWER LEVEL FOOTINGS EL 05d' (334'i3) 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND I. MODULAR FACE BRICK WITH MP RUNNING SONO WITH CONCAVE JOINTS 2. NIA 3. NIA 4. 2' LIMESTONE ROCKFACE EDGE CAP 5. PAIN SCREEN PANELS WITH OPEN JOINTS COLOR TO BE SELECTED 6. PREFINISIIED METAL FASCIA ]. 1I2 COMPOSITE PANEL SOFFIT 8 PREFINISIED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WITH SEAMS SPACED 11.3/4' O.C. WITH ASSOCIATED FIASHING'S S TRIM O 9, ANDERSON CLAD ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW- SEE SCHEDULE 10. ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT • SEE SCHEDULE 11. STEEL BEAM CANOPY SYSTEM WITH IIE.RODS 6BRACKETS SEE SECTIONS fl DETAILS 12, RAIN SCREEN PANEL JOINT - TYPICAL 13. DASHED LINE INDICATES WINDOWS LOCATED WITHIN AREAWELL 16. CAST IN PUCE CONCRETE STEPS 15. DASHED LINE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOTINGS- SEE FOUNDATION PLAN 15. COMPOSITE PANEL FASCIA 17. RETAINING WALL (FACE BRICK) IN FOREGROUND P. OR BACKGROUND M. STEEL PIPE GUARD RAIL 8 OR HANDRAIL sro 19. APPROXIMATE 3R0 STREET GRADES EI SIDEWALK 30. FACE BRICKIMASONRY CONTROL JOINT 20. BRICK COURSING STARTS 0 EL. 132'-0' 31. SCREEN WALL CAP CONST. • PREFINISIIED METAL FLASHING 31. STONE SILL SLOPED OVER TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 22. BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 23. ANCHOR STONE RETAINING WALL 2A. APPROX. STREET ELEVATION 25. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL 25. PATIO 23. SLOPED LAWN -SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 28. CONC. EXTERIOR STEPS 29. ROCKFACE CONCRETE MASONRY 6 ss s5� / I I I I I I� ���E 4 , 4 O.H.i....... • 0 O�� � ..=�lini, ■ � A. �r - ■ O All L „0-,Mall Dim I off --=- lic- 111111 IIIIIIII. IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII„_ ill ER El NM 111 Ell El 11”11. Eli! �■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111=1:21■■■G�= 11111111111111111 O I a 10 O 11 32. TRASH ENCLOSURE CIAO IN RAINSCREEN TO MATCH BUILDING 33. CITY OF STILLWATER CONCRETE CURB (BY 01HERS1 34. CITY OF STILLWATER BLACKTOP (BY OTHERS) 35, 5' CONCRETE SLAB WIBR00M FINISH SLOPE FLOOR TO DRAIN AWAY (TO LOADING AREA) 36. CITY OF STILLWATER RETAINING WALL 37. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCONCE 36. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 39. OVERFLOW SCUPPER 40. 6' STEEL GUTTER WITH CHAIN DOWNSPOUTS QWK j$EDF CU1G11LARw0w A fi _JQP OF0)17 A EL 126'-O'1]15'a') Y i�P OF N'NL A TEO IP Of WINDOW OPENIN0 4 EL. 119-2•(168T2') TOP OF WNI EL. lub'1763.-C) •nF nFTR nnR (PRECAST PI ANK)A E1. 111'-0'(160-0'1 Y TOP OE WAII A EL. 10S, IN (7594112'1 Y TOP nF TRq$02NCLO EL. 105'-0'(]DID,E) TO W ITYWAL E -0 (149� APPROX ELE0T,ON 5 PROP IT3T-0 NE 4 T__ HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCFIITECTO LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 "' S T R E E T BUITK A LAK5 51.1,40, MN 55042 PI -I O N 6 65 , - 95 1 - 1 760 FAX 65 1 -490•0 I SO WWW. HAFARGH I TEGT'O . G 0M TI-111R0 STORE., EICE 13L013 Nnatire [EAT!, rnAr IMPS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED NE OR UNE, MY DIRECT SMPERTSION ANO THAT I AM A DUET LICENSE° ARCHITECT UNDER TME LAWS OF TEE STATE Of MINNESOTA. ' V MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 08-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: inE DESIGNS SNOwN AND OESCRIBET HEREIN INCLUDING ALL •ECNNIOAL. DRAWINGS. GRAPHICS. AND MODELS TIERED, ARC PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED. DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY C,LCIITCO. WMOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT CYPRESS WRIITEN PERMISSION OF MAE ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE ',TEAS, FOR UNITED Rev.. ANO EVALUATOR POT CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS. AOENCIES. VENDORS AND orn0 PERSONNEL ON, IN ACOMPOANCE WEIN THIS NOTICE. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A9 IOR ELEVATION H to RO P ER TY LINE O 0 BUILDING SECO° l VANN\ I II I -I BUIIDING SECTIO! III�I it it li@9e BUILDI BUILD! G SECT. G SECTIO rn� % m m - 03 �T7y p1 m 0 Z U7 0 N 0 N 0 L733d3OH l3VH3I1,1 0 rAAr, £00+ > >10 m3A A<A14m irq m D r • T TOP OF RnnF EL M116'A"(ITS'-0y +TOPOFW H EL Ita'.a'p65-0) OPDF AIL EL III'E'1T69'F') ak MAIN 1 EVFI vow OPENINGS (BBIG1(1 EL. 106'-0'(25710') A I OADIwf JRNE sL/�� Y EL. 100'-0'7149'-0') EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND . MODULAR FACE BRICK WITH TO RUNNING BOND WITH CONCAVE JOINTS X NIA X X LIMESTONE ROCKFACE EDGE CAP 5. RAIN SCREEN PANELS WITH OPEN JOINTS COLOR. TO BE SELECTED 6. PREFINISHED METAL FASCIA T. 12-COMPOSITE PANEL SOFFIT 8. PREFINISHED METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WITH SEAMS SPACED 12-3I3' 0 0. WITH ASSOCIATED FLASIIINGS 8 TRIM cc O cc 9. ANDERSON CLAD ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW- SEE SCHEDULE 19 ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT -SEE SCHEDULE 11. STEEL BEAM CANOM SYSTEM WITH TIE -RODS 8 MAGNETS SEE SECTIONS 8 DETAILS 12..21 SCREEN PANEL JOINT -TYPICAL 13. DASHED LINE INDICATES WINDOWS LOCATED WITHINAREAWELL Ia. CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STEPS 15. DASHED LINE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOTINGS - SEE FOUNDATION PLAN IS. COMPOSITE PANEL FASCIA 17. RETAINING WALL (FACE BRICK)IN FOREGROUND 8 OR BACKGROUND 18. STEEL PIPE GUARD RAIL 8 0R HANDRAIL Yd 19. APPROXIMATE 3ND STREET GRADES @ SIDEWALK 20. BRICK COURSING STARTS @ EL. 101'S' 21. STONE SILL 22. BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 25. ANCHOR STONE RETAINING WALL N. APPROX. STREET ELEVATION 25. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL 26. PATIO V. SLOPED LAWN -SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 28. CONC. EXTERIOR STEPS 29. ROCKFACE CONCRETE MASONRY 30. FACE BRICI00000N111 CONTROL JOINT BI. SCREEN WALL CAP CONST. - PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING SLOPED OVER TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 02. TRASH ENCLOSURE CLAD IN RAwsCREEN TO MATCH BUILDING ll. CITY OF STILLWATER CONCRETE CURB (BY OTHERS) Ji. CITY OF STILLWATER BLACKTOP (BY OTHERS) 15. 5' CONCRETE SLAB WIBR0081 FINISH SLOPE FLOOR 10 DRAIN AWAY (TO LOADING AREA) 36. CRY OF STILLWATER RETUNING WALL 32. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCONCE 36. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 39. OVERFLOW SCUPPER 40. 6' STEEL GUTTER WITH CHAJN DOWNSPOUTS O Ii.11111M1- ;- iInk 0 O Hd N' 111111Q1111111 10 5'4 TAT OLPOF0°(1L TEL. 22a�rr(m0.0( '3) TOP 29 WALL EL 118-0' (1fit'V) TOPjj. 0J-E EL. 112101(761,1 cc O TEF10000 (T50OF BRI0.K EL. 'J') TOP OF BRJDIL EL 10314' (250141 TOP OF52620±LO0R EL I08.2 (720-0 ) .10P05622625 4 Y EL. War (1l1'-0') HAF ARCHITECTS HORFL0R ARCHITECTS LLC 1 2 44 5 5 5 " 9 T R E E T s LUTE A LAKE 6LM0, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- 3 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 655-490.O1 190 WWW. HAFAR GHITEG0-3- GONI MYRTLE THAT 1 ...ro A DHSS LiCENSECT ARCHITECT UNDER TITO LAMS OP Off- MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑B-049 M M H MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE. -Fr, ISEMCNS SHOWN AHO DESCRIBED HEREIN PAPS. WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OP MAX AGENCIES. VENETO, ANO OEFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN E COPYRIGHT NAP ARCHITECTS ZOOS ALL nisorrs iaESerivED ISSUE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS All EXTERIOR ELEVATION 9/32'•1'-0' directory HiF ARCHITECTS HAF. GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION P 11e s I. 27 1 ) l 88 107 THIRD 107 THIRD STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 HPC SUBMITTAL 03-18-2011 abbreviations SRO FLOORPEW KAMM BEAU En SWISH MEOW VW EL FOES OA CAA Orr 88a8Hro88 oomALA REAR, Ewm ENAMOR BOLT ELEVATION ELEVATOR FLOOR OMAN HOSECANTET WIENFOL PLIABLE CARNET HOSE SW HOLLAWORE HARDIONWER HOO PI SPA MINTED, RON LEFT WWI LINEAR pARALLA PERF RAE PLEE PLUMING POUNDS LIR WEAR FOOT PAREL POLEWOFEI PR PRES PAIR POONA PERSONA. FOOT POUNDS PER RONNIE NCR WATER PM PAPER TOMEI TIOPENSER PIN PARTITION PM PAPTIMAL RECUT. riP7AO F.L. RA OILOPITE TONGUE GROOVE ',LEE sEcEox THAW - IBC 2006 BUILDING CODE CHAPTER - USE AND CLASSIFICATION SECTION - BUSINESS GROUP S HEROINE B OCCUPANCY RETORT 2 SECTOR SORT - AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INCREASE PARRA INCREASE PEP SECTOR ARS ANO SOLO PROD WM% IR BUILDINGS WITH MORE THAN ONE STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE WOWEST LEVEL TO TOP OF TOWER/ STORVO ALLOWABLE STOMPS 2 STORES 1,000 SQUARE FRET ESTRUCTURAL FRAME: WEARING WALLS• EXTERIOR, WEARING WALLS -INTERN], PEON BEARING WALLS AND PARTHONARATERWRI - TARTS POE WON BEARE. WALLS WO PARLITIONE -INTERIOR: WOOER CONSTRUCTION- INCLUDES, BEAMS ARO TASTE: WOOF CONSTRUCTION • INCLUIANO BEANS AND JOISTS: code data PEECTRAT SW -FIRE ALARM A DETECTOR %PATENS WECTION OW -FIRE CEPAFFHTENT CORRECTIONS REECHO/I loca.z MEANS OF EGRESS CEILING HEIGHT NOT LESS TRW TA- RED STNR HEADROOM SHAOAIEST lama. a,. ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: T1 TITLE SHEET AS 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A8 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION Al0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION All EXTERIOR ELEVATION HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION ESTNUT.Ss RRET ARCHITECTSHNIF" ARCHITECTURE NNNA I N G T ERI O R S STILLWATER. MN PRONE 28210 TROTT INFORMATION: TITLE SHEET: T1 APPROXIMATE STORM SEWER INVERT: 732-T °ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN APPROXIMATE SANITARY SEWER" INVERT: 22.01 SITE PLAN -KEY NOTE LEGEND 'EXCAVATION SUB. TRADE SHALL REMOVE EXIST. H2O LINE d CAP OFF TO CRY STANDARDS. 1. EXCAVATION SUB. TRACE SHALL REMOVE EXIST. H2O LINE 6 CAP OFF TO CRY STANDARDS. THIS ITEM SHALL BE PAID FOR BY OTHERS. 3. EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NEW STORM PIPE TO EXIST. MYRTLE STREET STORM DRAINAGE. 6. EXCAVATION SUB. TRADE SHALL PROVIDE NEW E WATER SERVICE VERIFY BEST ROUTE TO MECH ROOM. S.EXCAVATION SUB. TRADE SHALL REMOVE EXIST.SANRARY SEWER LINE 6. OWNER SHALL OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING PERM,TSAISCONNECTS: A ASBESTOS EXCAVATION 6 REMOVAL B. GASCISCONNECT C. ELECTRICAL DISCONNECT D. CABLE T.V. DISCONNECT E. PHONE DISCONNECT T. NEW PHONE CONDUIT UNE PROVIDED BY OTHERS FOR NEW PHONE SERNCE. B ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER -UTILITY CO. TO EXACTLY LOCATE RECONNECT TO EXIST. POWER. 6 GAS METER LOCATIONS. 10. UNLRY COMPANY SHALL DISCONNECT EXIST. GAS LINE. TO EXIST. HOUSE 11. APPROX. LOCATION OF NEW GAS LINE -VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WNTIUTY CO. 12 EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A DRAIN 6 PIPE TO STORM UNE 13. EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVDE 61 GRAVEL 0E0 OVER LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE MAT. 16 MASONRY CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DRAIN TILE WI FABRIC 8 GRAVEL SURROUND. TERMINATE TO SUMP AT INTERIOR 15. USPS RELOCATED LIFT SYSTEM 18. WA IT. CONCRETE STEPS 18. CONCRETE SIDEWALK -PROVIDE SAWCUT CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN 19. CRY SIDEWALK- REMOVE d REPLACE WJNEW PROVIDE HC FLARED ENTRANCES ® ALL LOOS NOTE: EXTEND WALK TO STREET AT WEST STAIRS ONLY. 20. LANDSCAPE AREA 21. FLAGPOLE AND BASE 22 WY CONSTRUCTED PARKING LOT 6B612 CURB 6 GUTTER 23. TRASH ENCLOSURE -SEE PLAN. 26. EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE NEW SANITARY LINE- REPLACE 6 REPAIR ALL DISTURBED AREAS. 25. REMOVE EUST.RES•ENTWL PROPERTY INCLUDING STONE FOUNDATION. -VERIFY LIMITS OF REMOVAL 26 HANDRAL-SEE PLAN 27. EXISTING CONCRETE CITY SIDEWALK 28. EXISTING CRY PAVER EDGE 29. CONCRETE IANANO 30. CASTNN-PLACE CONCRETE WALL WITH FAILING - SEE PLAN 31. GRAVEL MULCH 32 MODULAR PETANING WALL-T.O.W. EL. 732S' TSP. U.N.O. 33. MODULAR RETAINING WALL-T.O.W. EL 712S' TYP. ...STING CATCH BASIN -PROTECT AS REOD FOR SILT 35. STORM CRAIN 36. AIR CONDITIONING COO. 37. BUILDING WALL -SEE PLAN 38. LANDSCAPE BORDER ....TING RETAINING WALL AND FENCE 40. ALUMINUM FENCE -3'S' HIGH. SET POSTS IN CONCRETE FOOTING 01. ALUMINUM R31 W G - 3'S1 HIGH. SET FENCE INTO BRACKET POCKETS ® C.I.P. WALL 12. AREAWELL 43. PARING LOT STRIPING BY OTTERS M. EXISTING LANDSCAPE BY OTHERS 15. EXISTING NEIGHBOORING PROPERTY OWNER RETAINING WALL 46. EXISTING NEIGHBOORING PROPERTY OWNER RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN IT. HARED ENDS I SLOPE IS. CITY INSTALLED SIDEWALK IS. EXISTING CONCRETE CURB 56 ALL PARKING LOT SIGNAGE BY OTHERS 51. DRAIN TILE EJECTOR 52. CANOPY EXTENSION ABOVE 52 STEEL GUARDRAIL -SEE PLAN SA ELECTRICAL MAN DISCONNECT LOCATION 56 EXISTING OVERIEAD ELECTRICAL POLE HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION sTiL LW AT R H. 6 5IE2 T,. l 2 8 8 HF ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PLANNING I N T ERI O R S 106 EAST CHESTNUT Si. 651-351-1760 651-430-0160 24210 SHEET INFoRmATION: ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN: AS1 r EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND 88 a wN gg 8 8 p G� a 8 5 31,111Ani3dONd 5 rd a$ 5 8 000 O Oo NOLL3 S 0NI0 NB III 0 0 N0203S 0NI ne O N0LLO350NI0An0 MIN cm7 .1.300N1011n0 O c ■ 6 N01113S ONwnne N011O30 0N101In0 El O ME MN ME MN MN ME ME E 0 JIB I— JI 0 1 1 -CrT F.;77@RQ � A TOP r AIL A TOP OF WALL_ YY EL 118'-0' (J67'U') A TEL OF WALL _ _ Y OP 113'J-(163'J') TYPICATOP9F L2 L EL 110J'r59'd') A TOP Of BRICK_ V EL 1093'r58'J-) { MAIN I 'WQWQPENINGS Cli EL tOJ'J'r52'J') A OWERI EVELVDNDDELDEELINCz Y EL 9>Jr96'J•) rz17RIEYELErpTILJGS_ EL BS'J'r39'J) 0 30'-0' 9 1111 1111 Mill IIII„ 1■II TOPQF 9OF EL. 127-211JJ6-27 T13POFWPLL EL-t2tlJ•r6RJ•) TOPOFWINDOW OPENING TOLOF GIRCUUROV/ W _ EL 1Tr, (305J') Y TOPOFWALL EL. 119'J're3J1 _TQE OFLOFTFI 00@f6RECARTPIANK)A ELM'-0•r6a-0•) Y - 6L 10 WALL A EL. 1094 U2'r684 U2') V 6L 103 IJSTTRASHaFNICLQ¢URE EL.1p8'-0' TOP 0p CRY WALL ENsulicsl0 INL0 WAU A 93.1(795-011 .................. ROPER EL 83'.1(732'-0•) EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND 1. MODULAR FACE BRICK WITH 1rz RUNNING BONO WITH CONCAVE JOINTS- PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS AND CLEAN BRICK UPON COMPLETEION 2 SITE ALUMINUM FENCE -SEE SITE PLAN 3. A0EK 11(12 PIECE) FASCIA -SEE BUILDING SECRONS 9. Y LIMESTONE ROCKFACE EDGE CAP- BEE PLAN FOR SIZES 5. RAIN SCREEN PANELS WITH OPEN UM JOINTS COLOR TO BE SELECTED -PRODEMA OR EQUAL- PROVIDE FLSHIxGS AS SHOWN AT TERMINATIONS 7. VW NEARED SOFFIT 8. PREFINSHED METAL STANNND SEAM ROOF PANELS WON SEAMS SPACED 11411' O.C. WITH ASSOCIATED FUSHINGS A TRIM 9. CIAO AACHRECTURAL WINDOW- SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE 10. AN0012E0 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT- SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE It. STEEL BEAM CANOPY SYSTEM WPM TIEROOS A BRACKETS SEE SECTIONS A DETAILS. 13. RAN SCREEN PANEL JOINT•TYPICAL 13. DASHED LINE INDICATES WINDOWS LOCATED WITHIN AREAWELL -SEE PUN 14. CAST N PLACE CONCRETE STEPS- SEE MUTING SECTIONS 16. DASHED UNE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOTINGS -SEE FOUNDATION PUN AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS I6. FREFINISNED NATAL CLOSURE TO MATCH ROOF I, RETAINING WALL(FACE BRICK) IN FOREGROUND OR BACKGROUND 18. STEEL GUARDRAIL -PRIME AND PANT- SEE BUILDING SECTIONS 19. APPROOMATE 3R0 STREET GRADES ®SIOEWALK-SEE SITE PLAN 20. BRICK COURSING STARTS 39 EL 737-0•. 1. STONE SILL -SLOPED 22. BRICK SOLDIER COLA.E 23. ANCHOR STONE RETAINING WALL 29. APPROX STREET ELEVATION 25. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL 28. TERMINATEPLANTINGS AND SEAL OFF ATSHEATHING AREAS - RAINSCREEN SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF THESE FUSHINGS UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE 7. SLOPED UM -SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 28. CONC. EXTERIOR STEPS 29. ROOTAGE CONCRETE MASONRY 30 FACE BRICKMA.WNRY CONTROL JOINT -PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH • TYPICAL 31. SCREEN WALL CAP CONSIL- PREFINISHED METAL SLOPED OVER TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 32. TRASH ENCLOSURE CLAD N RAINSGNEEN TO MATCH BUILDING 33 Cr, OFSTOLLWATER CONCRETE CURB (BY OTHERS) 36.E GINNIE STILLWATER BIACKTOP(BM OTHERS) 53, 31 CONCRETE SUB W.0013 FINISH SLOPE FLOOR TO ORAN ANArrto LOADR400451W AREA) 36. CITY OFSIILLWATER RETAINING WALLA GUR006ML(EXISTING) 37. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCONCE 38, EXTERIOR SIG... 39. OVERFLOW SCUPPER AO. M STEEL GUTTER WIN CHAIN DOWNSPOUTS 50. CAST N PLACE CONCRETE WALL HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE D E V E L O P M E N T CONSTRUCTION STILL. ATER,MN.5508 P H. 6 5 1.] 7 1.] 2 8 8 ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE EL NNNG I N i ER I O R S PHONE STILLWATER, MN 651-351-1760 651-430-0160 20210 024 SHEET INFORMATION: EXTERIOR ELEVATION: A9 OEXTERIOR ELEVATION 30-0• TOP 27 WINDOW TOP OF WINDOW_ A TOP OF WALL Y EL 114'd' (Ifi3'd') TOP OF WALL EL 11tld' (l59'd') A MAIN1FVFi WOy_JQPEN1ILLCa5 A TOP OF P1 YW000 OFCK Y ;LIP A TOP OF 1 OWFR I NFL WIINEW A LOWFR LEY6I WINDOW QyEtlMG� Y Eti. 9]u• pas•d•1 I OA A TOPOFIOWFR FVEL'' !1I YI I I I 1 I I I I I II I I I I I I 1 IE_I I I INN 0 a -17 III II 1 T 1 TOES/ TOWER ROOF EL 1378(78683 __LOP0.EIA'ALL EL 120LM(]69'4i TOPOFWINDQW)PENING EL 110.r(]60'8 SOP OEyL'ALL_ A EL 114'd'(l83'd' Y BOTQM 0Ff�1(iYJ TOP OF TRASH A EL 108'ao5re Y MAILI EL( EL.10Br (740.-0 IJ 1 EXISTING OLD RETAINING WALL II'1II1H 7 EXTERIOR ELEVATION- KEY NOTE LEGEND 1 MODULAR JOINTS- PROVIDENION CONTROL JOINTS AND CLEAN BRICK UPON COMPLETION 2. SITE ALUMINUM FENCE - SEE SITE PLAN 3. 02EK 1X (2 PIECE) FASCIA -SEE BUILDING SECTONS 4. Y LIMESTONE ROCKFACE EDGE CAP - SEE PVN F00.56E5 B RAIN SCREEN PANELS WITH OPEN I/4-JOINTS COLOR TO BE R EQUAL- PROVIDE FLPSNINGS AS SHOWN AT TERMINATIONS 6. PREFINISHED METAL FASCIA I. V' VEINED SOFFIT 0. PREFM15160 METAL STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS WITH SEAMS SPACED 17-3M 0.C. WRH ASSOCIATED HASHINGSB TWIN CLAD ARCHITECTURAL WINDOW- SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE 10. MOO. UM STOREFRONT- SEE WIVDOW SCHEDULE 11. STEEL BEAM CANOPY SYSTEM WON TIE -RODS S BROGKETS SEE SECTIONS S DETAILS. 1L RAIN SCREEN PANEL JOINT -TYPICAL 13. DASHED LINE INDICATES WINDOWS LOCATED WITHIN AREAWE6 -SEE PUN 10. CAST N PLACE CONCRETE STEPS- SEE BUILDING SECTIONS 15. DASHED LINE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOTINGS -SEE FOUN.TON PLAN AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 16. PREFNISHED MATAL CLOSURE TO MATCH ROOF IT. RETAINING WALL GAGE BRION IN FOREGROUNDOR BACKGROUND 6. 56EL GUARDRAIL -PRIME AND PAINT -SEE BUILDING SECO°. 19. APPROXIMATE 3RD STREET GRADES SIDEWALK -SEE SNE PLAN 20. BRICK COURSING STARTS3EL.T3Tr. 21. STONE SILL • SLOPED 22. BRICK SOLDIER COURSE 23. ANCHOR 57.E RETAINING WALL W. APPROX. STREET ELEVATION 25. STEEL PIPE HANDRAIL 26. TERMINATE FLASHNGS AND SEAL OFF AT SHEATHING AREAS - RAINSCREEN SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF THESE FLASHINOS UNLESS DETAILED OTHERWISE. 27. ROPED LAWNS. LANDSCAPE PAN 20. CONC. EXTERIOR STEPS 29. ROCKFACE CONCRETE MASONRY 30. FACE BRIC1930.150NRT CONTROL JOINT -PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH -TYPICAL 31. SCREEN WALL CAPCONST.- SREFINISHED METAL FLASHING LOPED OVER TREATED WOOD BLOCKING 32 TRASH ENCLOSURE CUD M RAINSCREEN TO MATCH BUILDING M. CITY OFSTLLWATER CONCRETE CURB (BY OTHERS) N. CRY OF ST1LLWATER BLACKTOP (BM OTHERS) 35. S CONCRETE SLABWISR00M FINISH SLOPE FLOOR. TO DRAIN AWAY (TO LBAONG AREA) 36. CT' OF STILLWATERRETAWMG WALL S GURADRAIL(EXISTING) 37. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SCONCE 35. EXTERIOR SDNAGE 39. OVERFLOW SCUPPER IT STEEL GUTTER WITH CHAIN OBWNSPBUTS 51 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WALL 7 HAF GROUP ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION .CHESTNUT. TaEET ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE PL N N 0 I N T E R I O R 5 EAST CHESTNUT ST • 24210 SHEET INFORMATION; EXTERIOR ELEVATION: A10 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION L J EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND ƒ ƒ j\( \ �( '/j \ / } \ r: Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 31, 2011 APPLICANT: Michael Hammer CASE NO.: 11-13 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Pub Monique LOCATION: 112 Main St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: April 4, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 112 Main St N for Pub Monique. The sign is proposed to contain the words "Pub Monique" in black letters on a gold background. There are also two accent features on the left and right sides of the sign that will be maroon and black in color. The sign is 27 feet wide by 2 feet tall for a total of 54 square feet in area. The sign will be placed into the exiting sign frame that has lights that surround the sign face. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 28 feet long facing Main St N. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 54 square feet, which is larger than allowed under the zoning ordinance; however, since this is replacing an existing sign the applicant is permitted to keep the same sign area. 112 Main St N Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. No additional exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (Lc photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 112 4' , v 5 !(• Assessor's Parcel No. (Required) Zoning District Description of Project in detail qn S Mack 0/14;likclef,/ Awl ()WI` Corte f 5iv) ;3 ,° -sue s, a` OJfc4f /L 1-/ Vhde "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then operty owner's signature is uired. Representatives t41u l7lt�, r� Mailing Address 1 Q) .4+1i ST_ f City State Zip 7�/ hCittfe , ° 6 Stigd Telephone No. 16jc) - 75 C/C't/ Property Owner Lt°-n P{t,( ((1 U'° Mailing Address \)0.‘° 120^\9 CI V City State Zip WI wa \A( h,. N S91 h 3 Telephone No.�� Signature if 30 Signature, g � equired) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 (Required) ✓„AMONIQIJC SIGN SUBSTRATE: .250in DiBond Aluminum Face TEXT AND GRAPHICS: First Surface Vinyl Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planne,' Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 Re: North Lowell Park and Pedestrian Walkway Message: Staff has been meeting with the design team headed by Sanders Wacker Bergly (SWB) since January on the North Lowell Park/Pedestrian Walkway project. During this time the team has been focus on: 1. Refining two concepts for the North Lowell Park Master Plan. 2. Developing four concepts for the Pedestrian Walkway. 3. Creating a preliminary layout and design for the bathroom facility. Attached are the concept plans that have been developed to date. The concepts provide a verity of ideas and designs that could be implemented and are by no means meant to limit what could be developed within the project area and many of the elements are interchangeable between the plans. Staff will review the plans with the Commission on Monday night. Please take a look plans and fill out the attached comment sheets so we can begin to address ideas, comments and concerns the HPC may have on the project. Positive comments are also appreciated! Thanks, Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP City Planner City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Name: HPC Comment Sheet North Lowell Park Master Plan and Pedestrian Walkway Plan Which of the North Lowell Park Master Plan do you prefer: Concept "A" Concept "B" Why: Which Elements do you like or dislike: Which of the Pedestrian Walkway Plans do you prefer: Concept "Al" Concept "A2" Concept "A3" Concept "B" Why: Which Elements do you like or dislike: Which of the Bathroom Plans do you prefer: Why: Which Elements do you like or dislike: General Comments: 111 PARKING LOWER RIvERWALK SQUTH.SECO D-STREEET - - - - - _ - �� \ / / / / / SOUTH UNION STREET - - - - - I I I I I I I I I NTH MAIN-STRE-ET = - _ __ HEM -WRIER-STREET I[I(I[11I� PARKING g 1 \ 1\ \ \I \ i lI � I I I STATE TRAIL 0' 25' 50' 100' NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinc0usinternet.com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZA STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I are a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: Drawn By Original Issue Date: goj 01/xx/11 Description: Revision: Date: CONCEPT A SHEET: C1 NORTH MAIN STREET —CIICI arf 1)ummizmi11m11i SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinc®usinternet.com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZA STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By gaj Original Issue Date: 01/xx/11 Revision: Date: Description: CONCEPT B SHEET: C2 / ILO NORTH MAIN STREET 387- CONCEPT Al NORTH MAIN STREET WATER STRUT _ _ _ _ _ _ —690— — — _. - i PARKING -688 CONCEPT A2 PARKING 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fan: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinc®usinternet.com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZA STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By. gaj Original Issue Date: 01 /xx/11 Revision: Date: Description: CONCEPT DETAILS SHEET: C3 NORTH MAIN STREET CONCEPT A3 NORTH MAIN STREET CONCEPT B 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 Phone: (651) 221-0401 Fax: (651) 297-6817 E—mail: swbinccusinternet_com NORTH LOWELL PARK MASTER PLAN AND PEDESTRIAN PLAZA STILLWATER, MINNESOTA I hereby certify that this plan. specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature Date: Reg. Number: Project Number: 1024 Drawn By. gaj Original Issue Date: 01 /xx/11 Revision: Date: Description: CONCEPT DETAILS SHEET: C4 z 0 z = Nunw rr; rri , > v > L- -1 FY) 4 > 7i 75 72 rri z z 4 4 Tll3' tld Z Aa.a tawa