Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-03-07 HPC PacketI 'HE. B i A T H c i. A G F E F MNNESOA Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, March 7, 2011 A workshop meeting will begin at 6 p.m., Monday, March 7, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. The purpose of the workshop will be to review and discuss the City's demolition process. The regular meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, March 7, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF February 7, 2011 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. 2011-08. Design review for signage on an existing pole located at 14130 60th Street North, Advanced Dermatology Care, in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Northern Sign Solutions, applicant. 5.02 Case No. 2011-09. Design review for signage for the replacement of existing projecting signs, Shanghai Bistro, located at 324 Main Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. SignArt Co., applicant. 5.03 Case No. 2011-10. Design review of Minus 5 Ice Box located at 305 Water Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. John Daly, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Letter from Lee Sather, owner of James Mulvey Inn, 622 Churchill Street West, request to terminate Bed and Breakfast special use permit. 7.02 Approval of FY 2010 CLG Grant Application 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 Workshop Session A workshop session to discuss the City's demolition process was held at 6 p.m., prior to the regular meeting. Chair Lieberman called the session to order at 6 p.m. In attendance were Commission members, Micky Cook (6:20), Robert Goodman, Jeff Johnson, Reggie Krakowski, Howard Lieberman, Roger Tomten and Scott Zahren; Planner Mike Pogge; and James Hanneman, law clerk volunteer. Mr. Hanneman reviewed pertinent demolition ordinance case law and spoke of the constitutional issues related to takings of property. There was discussion of the implications of the Penn Central decision as it relates to demolition and historic preservation. Mr. Pogge said the Penn Central case, which found there should not be an expectation of profit over and above what someone purchased into, has a good implication for the heritage preservation setting. Mr. Hanneman said an ordinance can result in some potential loss/cost to a property owner as long as it is not so great as to represent a taking. Mr. Hanneman noted that an historic preservation ordinance will impact a certain number of properties disproportionately to other properties, but in the Penn Central case, the court found that is ultimately justified. The court ruled that disproportionate impact does not represent a taking because there is reciprocity of advantage in that the owner of an historic property benefits from other historic properties being available in a community — everyone's property values go up because of the historic properties that are present, it becomes an identify of a community. On a question by Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Hanneman said generally Minnesota courts apply the Penn Central factors across the board; he said there have been very few takings in Minnesota based on historic preservation ordinances. Mr. Pogge reviewed state statute which defines powers the Commission needs to have. He pointed out that while a city has the authority to enact a demolition ordinance according to state statute, a city is limited, by that statute, to designated properties. Mr. Pogge noted that Stillwater has about 3 designated residential properties and about 73 commercial properties. Mr. Pogge suggested that if the Commission wants some long-term direction, it needs to look at local designation and other tools. He questioned whether the City has the legal right to deny a demolition of a structure that is not locally designated and suggested that the local designation is the piece that is missing in the existing ordinance. Mr. Pogge noted that establishing such a district will require a good amount of time and communication with the public. Mr. Tomten referred to the city of Minneapolis's ordinance, which provides for a 180-day delay in demolition permits and suggested that is a good tool for a community to come up with alternatives to a demolition of a certain property; Mr. Johnson said he thought the 180 days would help to make people think twice about demolition and perhaps reconsider that decision. Mr. Pogge said he also liked Minneapolis's approach of requiring staff review of all requests to determine whether to refer the property to the Heritage Preservation Commission to determine whether the property ought to go through the designation process. In discussion, it was noted establishing a local designation district has been discussed for many years, and the neighborhood studies were seen as beginning that process. Mr. Johnson suggested that, as with a national historic district, the local district will include both contributing and non-contributing properties and noted that establishing a district will not solve all the issues related to demolition requests. 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 There was discussion of what constitutes "partial demolition." In conclusion, Mr. Pogge suggested that the Commission consider asking the Council to establish a task force, including a cross-section of representatives, to consider the various tools available. He said he thought the HPC should have one more workshop session to more clearly establish what it would like any task force to accomplish and set a work plan to take to the Council. Related to the local designation district, he said he thought the Commission ought to pursue that as will be discussed at the 7 p.m. meeting. The workshop session was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Lieberman called the regular meeting to order at 7 p.m. Present: Micky Cook, Robert Goodman, Jeff Johnson, Howard Lieberman, Reggie Krakowski, Roger Tomten (8 p.m.) and Scott Zahren Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: John Bracht Approval of minutes — Mr. Johnson moved to approve the minutes of Jan.3, 2011. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2011-04. A demolition request for a two-story residence located at 607 Fourth Street South in RB, Two Family Residential District. Mark Balay Architects, representing Tim and Amy McKee, applicant. Continued from January 3, 2011 meeting. Mr. Pogge stated Mr. Balay, on behalf of the applicants, had submitted additional application material since the previous meeting/discussion. He referred to the three alternatives to demolition and options for rehabilitating the home provided by the applicant and noted the applicant believes those costs far exceed the value of the residence. He also noted the applicant provided additional information regarding the proposed reuse of the property. Also, the applicant submitted information pointing out that the South Hill survey completed by the HPC listed this property as not being a contributing property to any future South Hill designated historical district. Mr. Pogge noted that staff, based on City Code requirements, has found that, from a Code perspective, this structure does not meet the threshold for being historically significant; he said staff also believes the applicant has completed, and gone above and beyond, the nine steps required by ordinance. Mr. Johnson pointed out that because this property is not marked as being a contributing property in the South Hill survey map does not mean it might not be potentially contributing to a district, and he noted that it was listed as a potential Heirloom Home in the more recent survey done by Mr. Empson. In discussion, it was noted that there is some information missing from that initial South Hill survey. Mr. Balay referred to the additional information provided regarding 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 economic justification and the proposed reuse plan. Mr. Johnson verified that the plan for the reuse would result in an additional saleable parcel as described by the applicant. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Johnson noted for the record, that several letters from neighbors had been received in support of the proposal. Mr. Goodman suggested that Mr. Balay's cost estimates for the alternatives to demolition were very conservative. Mr. Krakowski said he thought the additional information was very helpful; Mr. Zahren agreed that the additional information helped justify the proposal. Mr. Lieberman said he thought this was a more complete packet with the additional information regarding economic justification and plans for reuse. Mr. Lieberman said he did not see a basis for denying this request based on the current ordinances. Mr. Johnson spoke of the importance of preserving the overall homogeneous qualities/integrities of neighborhoods that is not based on monetary value; however, he suggested that until the City establishes a district that defines and sets boundaries for historic neighborhoods, it would be difficult to deny the request. Mr. Goodman moved to grant the demolition permit. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion. Mr. Lieberman echoed Mr. Johnson's comments. It was noted conditions recommended by staff were included in the motion. Motion to grant the permit passed unanimously. Case No. 2011-06. A demolition and infill design review request of a single family home located at 1411 Carnelian Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. James Nelson and Elizabeth Whitbeck, applicants. The applicants were present. Mr. Lieberman reviewed the request. Mr. Nelson provided a bit of the history of the house, noting it has been in Ms. Whitbeck's family for many years. Mr. Nelson stated their desire for a first -floor addition was what ultimately led to this request. Also, he said they wanted to add a foundation for the structure and modernize the plumbing, which requires hooking up to City sewer. He said those plans require raising the elevation of the structure by about 3' to deal with water issues due to the topography of the property. He talked about other improvements they would like to make to the structure to make it livable for them. In developing plans for the improvements with an architect and structural engineer, a number of issues with the structure were discovered and it was found that the existing structure could not support the improvements. He said they were left with three options: building a new structure basically within the old; removing the second floor, strengthening the first floor and building a new second floor and roof as new construction; or demolishing the existing structure and constructing a new house. He reviewed the cost estimates for the options and the money they have already spent on the project and said the most feasible option for them is to demolish the existing structure and build a new house that has the same flavors as the old house. He noted elevations for the proposed new structure are included in the packet. He noted the only things that will be visible from the exterior of the new house are a change in the roof sections so they have a 12' pitch. He said the footprint of the new structure will stay essentially the same as the existing house but will be slightly taller. Mr. Lieberman suggested this request is different from the usual requests for demolition in that the applicants have lived in the house for a number of years and have a personal history with the property. Ms. Whitbeck said the new house will be almost the same as the old structure except larger and said they would be saving a lot of things from the old house to reuse in the 3 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 new. There was discussion about the requirement to advertise the structure for sale and whether that was applicable in this instance. Ms. Whitbeck spoke of the items they are planning to reuse and would not like to lose if the house was sold; Mr. Johnson pointed out that they would not have to sell the entire house, just the shell of the existing structure, and could make conditions in the advertisement that would still meet the requirement of the ordinance. Ms. Whitbeck asked if there could be an exception in this case since they are living in the house and have not where else to live. Mr. Lieberman questioned whether there could be an exemption from that requirement in that this is a unique situation with a substantial portion of the old house to be used in the new construction. Mr. Johnson suggested the best approach would be to meet the letter of the requirement by advertising the structure for sale with conditions regarding the items that are to be reused. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Goodman suggested that advertising the house for sale excluding the windows, doors and other items to be reused would essentially be advertising for demolition of the house. Mr. Johnson suggested it is unlikely someone will make an offer to purchase the house given the conditions, but he said it would fulfill the requirement of the ordinance. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the demolition permit based on the eight items submitted and that item 9,evidence the structure has been advertised for sale, be submitted to staff before the issuance of the permit. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion. There was additional discussion regarding requirement for advertisement. Motion passed unanimously. Plans for the new structure were included in the agenda packet. Mr. Nelson briefly reviewed the plans, including plans for windows, siding, exterior lighting. Mr. Johnson noted plans pick up a lot of the details of the original house, but suggested that before the original house is removed, some of those elements, such as sash areas and width of corner boards, be measured so those details will be accurately represented. Mr. Lieberman noted that while the HPC doesn't favor replication, this is a unique situation in that the applicants do wish to replicate a home that has been in the family for many years. Mr. Johnson moved to accept the plans for the infill design review as outlined. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. 2011-07. Design review for the construction of a 15,480 square foot, single -story medical office building located at 2900 Curve Crest Blvd in the CRD, Campus Research Development District. Dan Regan, applicant. The applicant was present. He spoke about his company and plans for this development as a two-phase medical office use. He said there likely will be five tenants between the two buildings when fully developed; the anchor for phase 1 is Health East, he said. He said they have worked with Jim Bradshaw regarding some of the private deed restrictions for the property and said they are meeting the criteria set forth in the private covenants. City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 Mr. Regan briefly reviewed elevation plans, building materials, roof lines and materials, fascia colors, lighting and other details. He said they had worked with Mr. Bradshaw and his landscape architects in developing plans and had incorporated those review comments in the landscaping and design of the property. Regarding lighting, he noted there was inconsistency between adjacent properties on the height of the light poles and said they plan to use 25' high poles set flush with the ground. On a question by Mr. Tomten, Mr. Regan said they were not applying for a sign permit at this time, just the design review permit; he said when sign designs are completed, those plans will be brought back for HPC review. On a question by Mr. Lieberman, the applicant reviewed plans for the trash enclosure. Mr. Bradshaw was present and said he thought the applicant had respected the intent of the covenants on the property and what he was intending to accomplish with the property he sees as a gateway to the City. He said he was comfortable with the plans he has seen. Mr. Johnson asked about the potential second building and whether it is seen as a companion to this first building or a different architecture. Mr. Regan said the second building will be a mirror image of this first building. He pointed out the size of the second building is limited by drainage calculation, impervious surface coverage and parking requirements but said whatever size building is constructed will look very similar or identical to the phase 1 building. Mr. Johnson moved approval as submitted and conditioned with the clarification that a sign permit application be submitted at a later date and is not part of this approval. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS John Daley of the Freight House was present with a request to have the ice bar again this season. He said the bar would be placed in the same location and would have the same wrap. He said the request is to set the bar up permanently, but operated on a temporary basis. Mr. Lieberman asked what would happen when ice bars are no longer popular; Mr. Daley said in that event, the structure would likely be torn down. He noted the temporary permit with the City is good for 90 days, with a possibility of extending that to 120 days, while Washington County health department's permit is for 180 days. He said setup and tear -down of the structure is the biggest expense. He said they would like to have the bar for several summers and are requesting the permanent permit to minimize those setup/tear-down costs. Mr. Johnson said he saw the ice bar structure as a bit incompatible with the Freight House building, which is a National Register property; he said he thought the structure was OK on a temporary basis, but would be concerned if left up year-round. Mr. Daley pointed out the location of the ice bar on the patio mitigates the visual impact; he wondered if a different wrap might help. Mr. Lieberman said he shared the concern about the permanent location in conjunction with an historic property, and expressed a concern that if the ice bar becomes less popular, the structure could end up being used as storage and could become an eyesore. Mr. Daley said the ice bar takes away seating from the patio, so if it becomes passe, it will be removed because of the importance of the patio seating. Mr. Zahren asked about the possibility of adding a condition that the ice bar be used for its intended purpose or removed. Mr. Johnson pointed out that as a temporary use, the structure doesn't fall within design guidelines; if it is looked at as a permanent structure, the design guidelines for accessory structure come into play. Mr. Lieberman noted there would be a 5 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission February 7, 2011 lot more flexibility in presentation if the structure is considered a temporary one versus one that would be restricted by design guidelines. Mr. Daley then inquired about the possibility of changing the timeframe for the temporary use, such as allowing up to 180 days, which would be consistent with the County's timeframe. It was noted the timeframe is not the purview of the HPC. At the conclusion of the discussion, it was noted the request for a temporary structure will come back to the HPC, and Mr. Daley can pursue possible changes to the temporary permit timeframe if he chooses. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Pogge told the Commission that the Council has authorized staff to proceed with development of a facade renovation program. He said the program will be a combination grant/loan program for facade improvements. He reviewed the details of the proposed program. There was discussion of TIF funding. Mr. Pogge stated some of the details of the program have yet to be worked out. He said, as proposed, projects would come before the HPC for review and recommendation as to which projects get funded under the program. Mr. Pogge reviewed his memo regarding the CLG grant to create a local designation district and staff recommendation to pursue a district for the North Hill as that is the smallest area, has a slightly higher percentage of property owners who have elected to participate in the Heirloom Home or Landmark sites program, and the area has previously been surveyed. He suggested this would not be an easy process due to public perception. He said the North Hill may not be the most significant but said he thought it was a good starting point due to the size, previous survey and level of voluntary participation in the Heirloom/Landmark programs. Ms. Cook asked whether all members of the Commission supported moving forward with the designation. Mr. Johnson noted this has been a goal of the Commission for many years, and he spoke of the opportunity of utilizing this grant cycle. Ms. Cook wondered whether sufficient groundwork has been laid for making the request of the Council at this time. Mr. Johnson pointed out that the Council has been supportive of the past architectural surveys with the goal of establishing a local designation district, and this is the next step in that process. There was discussion of some of the questions the Council might have. Mr. Tomten moved to support the North Hill designation district. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. ADJOURN Meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Lieberman, second by Mr. Johnson. 6 Memo Community Development Department To: HPC Members From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Thursday, March 03, 2011 Re: Workshop: Demolition Ordinance Review Message: During the February 7th HPC workshop, the Commission and staff reviewed the issue of building demolition from both a legal, state statue and city code prospective. The discussion led the Commission to decide to ask that the City Council consider developing a taskforce that has a cross -session of representatives from the community would be prudent to discuss this and other preservation issues in the community. To accomplish this, it was decided during the workshop that we would hold at least one more workshop session on March 7th to clearly establish a work program to present to the City Council. Since that time, during the March 1st City Council meeting, Kurt Klitzke of Airmed Biologics, Inc, appeared before the City Council to discuss various economic development strategies he felt the City should consider taking on. During that discussion he noted that he attended the January HPC meeting and witnessed the struggle the HPC went through related to the demolition of 607 4th St S. He suggested one economic development tools the City should employ is the development of a Housing Redevelopment Authority. Due to Mr. Klitzke's comments, the City Council asked for a joint meeting between the HPC and Council to discuss the condition of historic buildings in the City at a Council workshop. The joint workshop has tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, June 7th at 4:30 PM. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 41h Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us In preparation of the May Council workshop, the HPC should develop a list of topics they would like to discuss with the Council. The Commission should plan to have no more than one hour to discuss these issues so the list should be concise and to the point. Bases on our meeting in February I think there are three areas we should focus on. 1. Condition of Historic Building Stock 2. Hurdles to Preservation 3. Tools Needed to advance preservation I will work to developing some information on the condition of historic building stock using the Washington County's 2008 housing study, assessor records and real estate records. It would be helpful if I could tap a commissioner to assist in this work. As for the hurdles to preservation and tools needed to advance preservation, the Commission should discuss this on Monday and work on compiling a list. I will then work on developing bullet points for review at your April meeting. Below is a list of Tools that the Commission identified last month: • Demolition Review • Design Review • Rental Housing Inspections • Time of Purchase Inspections • Property Maintenance Code • Preservation Districts After the March meeting I will work to compile a 2 to 3 page summary of this information for discussion and approval during a workshop in April that will then be forwarded to the Council for the May workshop. Thanks! Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 2, 2011 APPLICANT: Rustad Properties CASE NO.: 11-08 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Advanced Dermatology LOCATION: 14130 60th St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: C -Commercial ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial HPC DATE: March 7, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a new freestanding sign for Advanced Dermatology at 14130 60th St N. The sign will go atop the pole that remains from the former Baker's Square sign. The sign is proposed to be an internally lit cabinet sign with a changeable letter message area. The name "Advanced Dermatology Care" is proposed to be in red letters with the website address "ADCderm.com" in black letters all on a white background. The sign will also allow up to three lines of changeable copy area. The sign is proposed to be 14 feet wide by 7 feet tall for a total area of 98 square feet. For retail signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that free standing signs along Highway 36 are permitted to be 100 square feet in size with a maximum height of 25 feet. The proposed sign meets these requirements. 14130 60th St N Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. The height of the sign shall not exceed 25 feet. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/ photo of the proposed sign DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 9? 7'V701 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required. r 4) i 3 b cPROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project I �--E ---r--Assessor's Parcel No. ' 5 — c'.3> 3 3 (Required)�� Zoning District b c— Description of Project in detail A d c.., i. 7- Pc" i _ j ,-� 1-1-1 -f c 5 1 t herebystate the ftegoing statements and all data, information and dense submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my Arnow/edge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit ifitis granted and used" representative Is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. ,QI- re-0- rty Owner , I �i . S-�7i C''1 Mailing Address I "(-�U 1 S �z-` Mailing Address 1 S 7 -f , 4- -3 i -1 vl City State Zip i 11Jc N ;0 y State Zip .3. ✓►-1 4. 5 . ,- Telephone N ►. (oS C L) M — 2-12� p Telephone No. loS (— G7 C Z - %t3 �q r , Signatures � .i�i Signature-- .—_ �'..-e_ .... equ red) H:\mcnamara\sheila\20o5\design review permlt.wpd July 13, 2005 Representative V) r I . r A �� .A (Required) Application for Siqn Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address / `i/ 3 6 461L4 S-7 City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Applicant Name Ad,ac;7eFcf JZ (AA fey/ml �' hone # P65/-.2`?4/_ °©?te' Address Cjif f © (�.r( ,,z,ki l(e Citte titi A--,,r . w, �,_ - _ r-) Zip rSSlz "7 Owner (if different from Applicant) Name Phone # Address City State Zip Contractor's Name Name / 1 r^-r 44JZ.G..) s%)r l,`-'rLi z>/vi 5`, : c - Phone # 6S—i " 1 g 2- — 6 J 6 ," Address 4 ., f56z.-7 1=�rst6(voAl / City ijk..50 State /141n) Zip �3� Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West view by HPC. Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: _7 ; / X / 4/ , &',7 = Square Feet (To Sign Height: (If freestanding) /7 Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: g,�.c / k,'/2/ /QG/� Matenals: /fin, nuv� / �yC crz '.�,��� Illumination: r Yes a No If Yes, Type: /'c f ?S ss�-14" Declaration hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Owner Signature (required) Applicant Signature/ Review (For office u6e'only) ❑ Denied Date Date /`3(z o/i ❑ Approved Permit* Date By Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 A FULL SERVICE SIGN COMPANY Phone: 651.982.6069 Fax: 651.982.2925 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY CARE ADCderm.com • 43 0-2 72 4 - CHANGEABLE COPY WILL GO HERE ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY CARE ADCderm.com • 430-2724 _. _.•..�.•CHANGE/41LO COPY ��••...-..._.. PoklhEN..d..r..��.., 'LA Date: 02.03.11 Due: Client: Adv Derm_Jennifer File # 11-10 Image Colors: Red/Black Qty. I - Double sided pylon sign with 2 polycarbonate panels Size: 7'h x I4'w Layout Approval By signing this approval I am in agreement that the spelling and design of this layout is accurate and that Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. is not responsible for any errors.This design has been created by Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. and is property of Northern Sign Solution, Inc. until it is purchased at the established shop rate of a basic or complex logo. Should this design be used for any production by any other party other than Northern Sign Solutions, Inc. you will be invoiced for the purchase of the design.The design will then be released to you to be used in any advertising media you wish. Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 2, 2011 APPLICANT: Grand Garage Holdings LLC REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for the Shanghai Bistro LOCATION: 324 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: March 7, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner CASE NO.: 11-09 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review approval of new signage for the "Shanghai Bistro" in the former Kitchen Restaurant space at 324 Main St S in the Grand Garage. The request would replace the signs along Main St S and Nelson Alley with a new projecting signs. The existing projecting sign along Main Street is 25 square feet and the existing projecting sign along Nelson Ally is 23.76 square feet. Projection sign facing Main Street The first proposed new projection sign is on the east elevation along Main Street. The proposed sign will replace the existing 5 feet wide by 5 feet tall (25 square feet) sign. The new sign is in two sections with the upper portion being 2 feet by 5'10" and the lower portion being 3 foot wide by 1'8" tall. The total sign is area is 17.2 square feet, which is less that the current sign size. The sign will have white standoff letters with LEDs that will light back toward the sign similar to the old Kitchen sign. The sign will have silver color aluminum accent pieces and logo all on a black background. 324 Main St S Page 2 Projection sign facing Nelson Alley The second proposed projection sign is on the north elevation along Nelson Alley. The proposed sign will replace the former Stones Sign, which is a circular face that measures 58.5" x 58.5" sign for a total area of 23.76 square feet. This sign will also be 17.2 square feet, which is less that the current sign size. The new sign on Nelson Alley will be similar in size, color and dimension with the one proposed for Main Street. The only difference between the two signs will be the method of illumination. Unlike the Main St sign which will have LEDs that will light back toward the sign similar to the old Kitchen sign (know as halo lighting), this sign will be lit with have external arm that will like the sign similar to the existing sign. For retail projection signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states projection signs in the CBD are limited to a total area not to exceed six square feet. A variance was granted for these two projecting signs on this site. The variance allows for a 39.6 square foot sign along Main St and a 23.76 square foot sign along Nelson Alley (Planning Case 2006-47). Since the proposed signs are the same or smaller than what was approved in the variance the new signs are considered conforming and do not need a new variance. It is important to note that after one year the allowable sign area allowed under the variance will be reduced to the size of the new signs, which is 17.2 square feet for both signs. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL Conditions for all Signs 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. All temporary signs are to be removed prior to the installation of any of the permanent signage. 3. No additional signage. Conditions for the Projection sign facing Main Street 4. The sign shall be lit with halo illumined standoff letter similar to the existing sign. Conditions for the Projection sign facing Nelson Alley 5. That the sign shall be lit only as shown on the approved plans. FINDINGS The proposal, as conditioned, meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual and the Stillwater zoning ordinance. attachments: Applicant's Form, Elevation Drawing of the proposed signs and changes. Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 3a,--\ COCAn vk& ssessor's Parcel No. Al o3oc o Lis e 010 Zoning District CEP Description of Project in detail 'QC-' \Ck c P x 1 r i AP_c.:ti r\( lc r\ \J t 'ma on.e. vac .e? kt Q t 1��� rAr v,W-� NEB C'c0� �r��� \p(CCea ,f)C►. \cc "I hereby state de foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property OwnerGCcund. a.rtvey_ }- VSLair. Representative Mailing Address 01 5 . Muir\ City State Zip 3 1\rM tf «YlN► b'D- Telephone No. 1d61-ola 8 - e iOC`-, S:\Planning\design review permit.wpd gri- Co,inc. Mailing AddressLS70 OCCtcl 12d City State Zip ifitilck t \q1 Telephone No. & Sl -_ LoMs-OU-413 April 12, 2002 ..Location Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Address 32L1 ffloorN ,pphca it, : City Stillwater Nam i �j l ��1 'V Co . f 1 c , KaC tF _r erict) Address e� _City i t� r ��r-i C f'tenclok ' . C 1t anrraer"(ff Ifer # fA ftr PJl atttE Name Grq..d Address Z Contractor's` � A 5, , r 4 9E y�,5 u r Name icjntvYf Co., Inc. Address City 21iG rnen60fin.��h) Attached are the following documents Re uired to be sub tted Dodd le.ck State MN Zip 55082 Pho e # (pJj crags-(.' State` PhRne # ( V1/-?7 y(od SytB_ � Z d Z 'VAT- t [� T- coat -€ E L Stth Zi 12U 9 (Required with application) ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Sign Size: Dimensions: 3, Li tf X ! Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg = Square Feet Sign Height: (If freestanding) From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: $\ACK wh++-e Illumination: X Yes ❑ No Declaration Mater als: If Yes, Type: , K A, \c E c ec l \nd ►Ir ecf I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this request. Owner Signature (required) * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 DOUBLE SIDED BLADE SIGN ALUMINUM CABINET WITH ROUTERED FACE AND Yz DEEP ACRYLIC PUSH THRU LETTERS WITH OPAQUE WHITE VINYL ON FACES AND TRANSPARENT RETURNS SIGN MOUNTED TO WALL WITH BRACKETS FRONT LOCATION PAGE1 VINYL LOGO ON PAINTED ALUMINUM ALUMINUM ACCENT PIECES N 2'-0 ' 1'3' --► 3'-4 ' 0'-5 3/4" - -- m 0 ♦ '/:" PUSH THRU LETTERS PROFILE PUSH THRU LETTERS SHANGHAI BISTRO STILLWATER BLADE 2 SHANGHAI BISTRO STILLWATER, MN SARAH WANG JEFF WEISPFENNING 1-20-11 2-10-11 2-14-11 2-17-11 2-22-11 1" = 1' CIO Sign Art Co. Eau Claire, WI St. Paul, MN PH 651-688-0563 FX 651-688-zo8i This drawing was created to assist you in visualizing our proposal. This drawing is the property of Sign Art Company and may not be reproduced by others. EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED DOUBLE SIDED BLADE SIGN FABRICATED ALUMINUM BODY WITH 1A' THICK FLAT CUT OUT PAINTED SINTRA LETTERS SIGN MOUNTED TO WALL WITH BRACKETS SIDE LOCATION PAGE 2 l I 1 i I I I I I VINYL LOGO ON PAINTED ALUMINUM ALUMINUM ACCENT PIECES k 4 2'-0 �— 1'-3 " 3'-4 ' (SIDE VIEW OF LIGHT) 3' 0 ' SINTRA LETTERS PROFILE EXTENAL LIGHTING SYSTEM STAINLESS STEEL POLE AND i?" ALUMINUM LIGHT CANOPY ►1 MOUNTED TO BOTH SIDES. SINTRA LETTERS SHANGHAI BISTRO STILLWATER BLADE 2 SHANGHAI BISTRO STILLWATER, MN JEFF WEISPFENNING 1-20-11 2-10-11 2-14-11 2-17-11 1" = 1' (signr) Sign Art Co. Eau Claire, WI St. Paul, MN PH 651-688-0563 FX 651-688-z081 This drawing was created to assist you in visualizing our proposal. This drawing is the property of Sign Art Company and may not be reproduced by others. fIr Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: March 2, 2011 APPLICANT: John Daly, Freight House CASE NO.: 11-10 REQUEST: Design Review for a seasonal outdoor ice bar at the Freight House LOCATION: 305 Water St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: March 7, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a seasonal ice bar on the north end of the Freight House patio at 305 Water St S. The main ice bar structure is a 31' by 16' (496 square feet) panelized cooler system. The exterior of the cooler will be covered with a vinyl wrap system. The applicant has proposed an abstract ice cube design with no company logo. A minus 5° logo would be located at the entry of the ice house. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny the request. 3. Continue the request for more information. The 60-day decision deadline for the request is April 15, 2011 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2011. 305 Water St S Page 2 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No temporary signs are permitted associated with the ice bar use. 3. No additional signage without HPC approval. 4. The ice bar is permitted to be on site for no more than 180 days per year. If the use is discontinued for more than 365 days, a new design review permit shall be required. 5. Evidence that the structure meets the requirements of flood -proofing requirements of City Code Section 31-400 Subd. 4(5) shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Review and take an action. attachments: Applicant's Foini and info' cation packet Telephone No. Cpi2 3 ?', c 4/ DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No:.���r'� Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of Intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following Information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project.510-7 x. Assessor's Parcel No. Z fOjcl ZD le t'oa (Required) Zoning District CBi7 Description of Project in detail u r ' "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my know/edge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner --YES- 5frj�4�, � �;L Representative ,% ��K �w 9 Mailing Address 27o S �5-1 -14 (4Mailing Address 30 5 /�T�• -r City State Zip ? �s /� s) ycZ City State Zip ,Srr�.w‘---7� 2 -' " Telephone No. C a' 5-/0 e -39 — 5zy d' Signature Signature (Required) fired) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\des gn review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Mr. Michel Pogge, AICP' City Planner City Hall 216 N. 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Mr. Pogge, The Freight House Restaurant and Night Club, located at 305 Water Street South overlooking the beautiful St. Croix River in historic downtown Stillwater, MN requests the issuance of a temporary structure permit for the addition of the Minus5 Ice Bar. The Minus5 Ice Bar will ensure that Stillwater's Central Business District and the Freight House will be marketed and positioned well to attract revenue dollars in these tough economic times. We request a minimum permit time of 90 days to operate and prefer 150-180 days for operational purposes to offset construction related expenses. The Minus5 Ice Bar will be located in the same location as in 2009, on the Northwest side of the patio area tucked visually towards the Freight House building, and with the same or similar graphic wrap as was previously approved. We plan to operate in the early May to early October time frame with a flexible start date based on potential St. Croix River flooding levels and adverse weather. Sincerely, John Daly General Manager Freight House Restaurant and Night Club 305 Water Street South Stillwater, MN 55082 651-439-5718 John@fhstillwater.com www.fhstillwater.com www.minus5experience.com Minus 5 Portable Lounge Stillwater, MN Concept- Abstract REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 114'.10' vFLOOR PLAN ;'SCALE: 1!4 1V' Minus 5 Temporary Lounge T WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 3 ,,ELEVATIONS SCALE: 114'.1V' NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION - .. 9.1.: ,,. Stillwater. MN FRONRIFE group MOSER Floor Plan : Sn.. 9m. 04024.000 P.ol.d... 4.164009 D. arctdtecture studio NOTE: Site plan provided for location and site orientation. All existing structures, parking, landscaping and adjacent property will not be affected by the proposed temporary structure. Fes- w cc NI CHESTNUT STREET E. • W K rL0 LIJ CO 0 0 Q _CO NELSON STREET SITE PLAN SCALE 1:<0 Minus 5 Temporary Lounge Stillwater. MN 6 2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 : 2 f.....,...c 2 ti A Location Map SITE INFORMATION w . W aaning on County. MN .41 wnnoe) •a— a.. 9 /6J Sq. GL .� a•..• 100 Sy. FL Sy. 1:20 ERONTUM al y Me e.6LLp restauu•n group MOSER SAe Plan Snee+TW 0,02.0n0 n•oloct Mum. t.1e.210e on. architecture stain 2-24-2011 Michel Pogge City Planner Stillwater, MN Re: Special Use Permit 2009-47 Michel, Thank you for assisting in documenting my request to terminate the operating permit for the James Mulvey Inn, 622 Churchill Street West, Stillwater. We discontinued operations as a Bed and Breakfast December 31st, 2010. In order to assist with financing for the property to be purchase as a single family home and to provide documentation that it will no longer be permitted to operate as a Bed and Breakfast we need the follow statement sent to Carl Baglio at Keller Williams (fax 651 439-4026): "The City of Stillwater, MN by the owner's request, has terminated the James Mulvey Inn, 622 Churchill St. W Bed and Breakfast Special Permit Case No. 2009-47 effective December 31, 2010." This statement is to assure the mortgage underwriter for the buyers of the property that it will not in the future be operated as a B and B. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. It would do me a great favor if this information could reach Carl Baglio by February 25th at fax number 651439-4026. We have much enjoyed operating the James Mulvey Inn for the past few years. Stillwater has been very good to us. Sincerely, smc,„-L- Lee Sather, owner, James Mulvey Inn 6351 St. Croix Trl N Stillwater, MN 55082 651247-9303 Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner## Date: Thursday, March 03, 2011 Re: SHPO FY 2011 CLG Grant Application and Approval for the HPC to conduct a study to consider the development of a local designation district. Message: As the commission is aware, staff prepared an the CLG grant application to study the development of a local designation district. Staff received comments back from the Mike Koop from SHPO on Monday, March 7th regarding the grant preapplication. Mike advised me that the Legacy small grants have been exhausted for the year and will not be available to act as a match for the grant. To enable the project this year the City would need to come up with a cash match of S7,000, which the City simply does not have at this time. Due to this the grant have been withdrawn for FY 2011. Moving forward I do continue to believe that the creation of a local designation district is a critical item the City to consider and take on. To that end I don't plan to give up. In the near future (a month or two down the road) I plan to sit down with Don Empson and others interested to discuss it and formulate a plan to get in a position that we could move forward next year. It will also give us more time to lay ground work on the issue and address the concerns people may have. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4t1, Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planneryt Date: Thursday, March 03, 2011 Re: History IN your Backyard on Sunday April 3 Message: Carolyn Phelps from the Washington Council Historic Courthouse has offered to give the HPC a free booth in the upcoming History IN your Backyard event. The event is Sunday April 3 from Noon to 3 PM at the Washington Council Historic Courthouse. If the Commission is interested in hosting a booth, we would need a have at least two members of the Commission along with myself staff the booth. We should discuss this at our meeting on March 7th to see if there is interest so I can get back to Carolyn to let her know. Thanks, Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4t1i Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Memo Community Development Department To: From: Michel Pogge, City Planner6 Date: Thursday, March 03, 2011 Re: Landmark home program Message: Heritage Preservation Commission 319 As of date, we have not had the response I was hoping for in this year's landmark home program. Attached shows potential landmark homes that have not yet signed up to be part of the program. Please take some time to review the list and let me know if there are ones you feel we should specifically target. Also, if you know any of these people on the list and could reach out to that too would be helpful. Please be prepared to discuss this at the meeting on Monday March 7th To have this project be as successful as possible, we need to get as many as possible to sign up and soon. Thanks, Mike From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner -City of Stillwater • 216 N. 411' Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us Don's # Card DB Address Site Name Title Owner Address CTZ 31 NO! Y 304 South Holcombe Street 21 Y 1018 South First Street 10 Y 106 East Chestnut Street 11 Y 114 East Chestnut Street 8 Y 117 East Burlington Street 33 Y 118 West Oak Street 58 Y 1204 Third Avenue South 3 Y 12588 Boutwell Road 57 Y 1306 South Third Avenue 42 Y 2007 Schulenburg Alley 59 Y 205 East Walnut Street 49 Y 401 North Third Street 35 Y 406 West Olive 18 Y 407 South Fifth Street 19 Y 416 South Fifth Street 27 Y 416 South Fourth Street 7 Y 435 South Broadway 20 Y 504 South Fifth Street 37 Y 518 North Owens Street 32 Y 604 West Myrtle Street 51 Y 611 South Third Street 6 Y 651 South Broadway 52 Y 703 South Third Street 53 Y 704 South Third Street 28 Y 711 South Greeley Street 36 Y 713 West Olive 15 Y 717 West Churchill Street 54 Y 719 South Third Street 29 Y 720 South Greeley Street 30 Y 812 South Harriet Street 55 Y 821 South Third Street 56 Y 904 South Third Street Torinus House Nelson School Cutler House Brunswick House Welshons House Potts House Dudley Hersey House Boutwell House Lammers House Dutchtown House Spencer House Register House Ernest Hospes House St. Mary's parish house Seward House Hersey House Webster House Jenks House Streetcar Station Elisha Brown House St. Michael's Church Castle House O'Shaughnessy House Tozer House Lampi House Ole Olsen House Warner House Glaspie House Tolen House LancWietiee Putz House Chalmers House Joy House Ms. Montbriand XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX R2W Properties LLC Investment Lending Group LLC Mr. and Mrs. Carlson Mr. Kilty Mr. and Mrs. Bealka XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Mr. and Mrs. Jordan Mr. Nauman and Mr. Swanson Mr. and Mrs. Stenerson Mr, and Mrs. Ellman Mr. and Mrs. Gorski Church of St Mary Mr. and Mrs. Balay Tracy Boo Ms. Lammers Mr. Vaughn Mr, and Mrs. Voves Mr. Kelly Church of St Michael Mr. Krag Ms. Nelson Mr. and Mrs. Tunheim Mr. and Mrs. Rechtiene Mr. and Mrs. Dullinger Mr. and Mrs. Webber Mr. and Mrs. Bentzin Mr. Nederloe Shirley Montbriand R2W Properties LLC Investment Lending Group LLC Kenneth & Mary Carlson Richard S Kilty Sandra L & E Michael Bealka Robert H & Susan G Jordan Richard Nauman & Richard Swanson Maurice D & Jeanne Steverson Jeff & Teressa Ellman Nicholas C & Wendy Gorski Church of St Mary Mark 5 & Catherine N Balay Tracy Boo June E Lammers John T Vaughn Thomas J & Maureen K Voves Patrick T Kelly Church of St Michael Jeffry N Krag Jacqueline A Nelson John R & Kathryn H Tunheim Jeffrey & Angela Watt Rechtiene Robert W & Debra Dullinger Shirley K & Robert B Webber William A & Iva I Bentzin Christian E Nederloe Ms. Glennon Westward Development LLC Ms. Samuelson Margaret Glennon Westward Development LLC Eleanor M Samuelson 304 Holcombe St S Stillwater, MN 55082 106 Chestnut E 15806 Venture Ln 117 Burlington St E 118 Oak St W 1204 3rd Ave S 1306 3rd St 5 1101 Lecuyer Ct 205 Walnut St E 401 3rd St N 406 W Olive St 407 5th St 5 416 5th St S 416 4th St 5 435 Broadway St S 504 5th St S 518 Owens St N 604 Myrtle St W 611 S 3rd St 651 5 Broadway St 6628 Brittany Rd 704 S 3rd St 11109 Lockridge Ct N 713 W Olive St 717 Churchill St W 719 S 3rd St 720 Greeley St S o `'`ter"" t-Yd 812 S Harriet St 2435 North Shore Dr 904 3rd St S Stillwater, MN 55082 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Edina, MN 55435 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater, MN 55082 'GG Stillwater, MN 55082 Wayzata, MN 55391 Stillwater, MN 55082