The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011-01-03 HPC Packeti. AGE Cc h! i !d N ES 01 A Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, January 3, 2011 The regular meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, January 3, 2011 in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall, 216North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF December 6, 2010 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. 2011-04. A demolition request for a two-story residence located at 607 Fourth Street South in RB, Two Family Residential District. Mark Balay Architects, representing Tim and Amy McKee, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. 2011-01. Design review of signage located at 225 Chestnut Street East in the CBD, Central Business District. Mary Beth Johnson, applicant. 5.02 Case No. 2011-02. Design review of a signage located at 1798 Market Drive in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Crosstown Sign, applicant. 5.03 Case No. 2011-03. Design review of signage located at 1815 Greeley Street South in the BP -I, Business Park Industrial District. Airmed Biologics, Inc., applicant. 5.04 Case No. 2011-05. Design review of signage located at 450 Main Street North in the CBD, Central Business District. Marty Larson, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.01 Design expansion discussion at Trinity Lutheran Church. 6.02 Election of chair for 2011. 6.03 Demolition Ordinance Review. 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURN b City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission Dec. 6, 2010 Present: Howard Lieberman, chair John Bracht, Micky Cook, Jeff Johnson, Reggie Krakowski, Roger Tomten and Scott Zahren Absent: Robert Goodman Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Krakowski, seconded by Mr. Zahren, moved approval of the minutes of Nov. 1, 2010. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. 2010-45 Design review of renovation of front facade and signage at 215 Main St. S. (The Green Room) in the CBD, Central Business District. Christopher Durant, applicant. The applicants were present, noting this is a work in progress, even the name, which may have to be changed to just "Green Room." It was stated the basic look of the sign won't change much and will be reduced in size to meet the ordinance requirements. It was noted that the storefront is being designed to fit well with the businesses on either side, so the combination of colors is being selected to be complimentary to the existing businesses. Mr. Johnson asked about plans to move the door. The applicants stated they believe it necessary in this climate to have a double door and said plans are to do that as un-invasively as possible; it was noted there is nothing structural that will be changed in order to accomplish the double door. Mr. Johnson asked if they plan to reuse the existing door; the applicants responded that the existing door will probably be used on the inside, with a new door, replicating the appearance of the existing door, on the outside. Mr. Johnson asked about the transoms; the applicants stated they would remain glass. Regarding signage, Mr. Johnson noted that it is allowable to paint up to one-third of the area of the glass on the inside. Mr. Johnson asked if there would be a projecting sign in the back as well as the one on the front elevation; the applicants stated there are no plans for a projecting sign on the rear elevation. The applicants described plans for changes to the interior of the building. Mr. Zahren asked if there had been any talk of leveling off the sidewalk in the back of the building; the applicants stated there had been no talk of that but said they would like to do something with that in the future. Mr. Johnson asked about lighting; the applicants said they weren't decided on those plans at this time. Regarding the projecting sign, Mr. Johnson suggested the applicants consider a thin border to make it stand out a bit more; the applicants stated the sign would be on a metal frame, which should help define the border. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the projecting sign, limited to 6 square feet as required by the ordinance; to approve plans for moving the entry 1'7" as requested, reusing the same door or a door that has a wider frame and taller lower portion if the door is to be replaced; and that the lighting be approved as it currently exists on the building; and with the condition that final color chips and samples and final color rendering be presented to staff for approval. Mr. Lieberman noted that if the applicants decide to change the lighting, those plans will need to be submitted to the Heritage Preservation Commission for approval. Mr. Bracht seconded the motion. Mr. Zahren asked about plans for Dumpsters; the applicant said they might cooperate with Brine's. Mr. Pogge noted there are three businesses using the Dumpster in question, but said the applicants should be able to utilize the container; Mr. Pogge suggested the applicants discuss that situation with him. Mr. Johnson noted there is a condition of approval regarding trash Dumpsters. Mr. Zahren asked Mr. Pogge about the ownership of the sidewalk; Mr. Pogge stated that is partially located on City property and partially outside of the City property, noting that the portion of the walk that is in really poor condition is not located on City property. Mr. Zahren asked whether repair of the sidewalk could be made a condition of approval; Mr. Pogge noted the sidewalk repair would have to be a coordinated project of the building owners to address drainage and other issues. It was clarified that Mr. Johnson's motion includes the other conditions recommended by staff. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. 2010-46 Design review of signage at 2200 Frontage Road (Crossings Inn and Suites) in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Scenic Sign Corp., applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Johnson noted that everything is in conformance with the regulations/ordinance and moved to approve as submitted. Mr. Bracht seconded the motion, clarifying it included the conditions seconded by staff; motion passed unanimously. Case No. 2010-47 Design review of signage for Avante Salon at 222 Third St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Theresa Dziuk, applicant. Mr. Pogge stated the applicant could not be present due to a conflict. Mr. Lieberman noted this is a grandfathered situation. Mr. Johnson asked whether in a grandfathered situation, the sign in question can continue for perpetuity or if the grandfathering right expires after the original tenant who obtained approval leaves the location. Mr. Pogge said if the sign was approved by the City, has been in continuous use and no changes are made to the size, it is grandfathered; he said if the business remains vacant and the sign not used for a period of one year, the grandfathering right expires. Mr. Johnson suggested that this situation drives home the importance of not making exceptions to the ordinance, as an exception can potentially be in existence forever, even if granted specifically with one applicant in mind. Mr. Krakowski moved approval as conditioned. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of solar panels — Mr. Pogge briefly reviewed the proposed guidelines, which would apply specifically to the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD). There was discussion as to the guidelines impact on the effectiveness of the solar panels; it was noted that the impacts could be dramatic, depending on the specifics of a property and orientation of structures on that property. Mr. Lieberman asked about regulations of TV antenna dishes; Mr. Pogge said in theory those would have to be painted as no advertising is allowed facing the street, but that has not really been enforced. It was noted that technology has greatly reduced the size of the dishes and FCC regulations would supersede any regulations the City passed. Mr. Bracht noted there is solar technology now that basically makes shingles the energy collectors and asked whether those would be allowed under this proposal. Mr. Pogge noted that is addressed in this proposal and would be allowed unless it would require removal of a significant element of a home, such as a time or slate roof. Regarding residential properties outside of the Neighborhood Conservation District, Mr. Pogge said the proposal would require that solar collectors be placed in a side or rear yard and not on a front elevation, with no other restrictions. There was a question as to whether the proposal for the NCD would allow collectors in an exterior side yard; Mr. Pogge stated the intent is not to allow that. Mr. Lieberman asked about the requirement that solar panels be flush mounted on a roof "to the extent feasible;" Mr. Pogge said any disagreement regarding the feasibility of flush mounting in the NCD would come before the HPC. Mr. Tomten asked whether the proposal was an ordinance or guideline; Mr. Pogge noted these are similar to the design guidelines for the downtown historic district and the Neighborhood Conservation District. Mr. Tomten asked what would happen if someone can't meet the guidelines, whether the property owner could appeal to the HPC and Council; Mr. Pogge responded in the affirmative. Ms. Cook asked about a requirement to screen collectors placed in a back yard; Mr. Pogge said there is a requirement to screen panels not attached to a building with landscaping elements. Ms. Cook expressed concern about the visibility of systems placed in a backyard, suggesting in some instances it might be preferable to have a collector system installed on the primary structure; Mr. Lieberman suggested broader wording to state that there be an attempt, wherever feasible, to install the panels in a way to be the least visible from the street. Mr. Pogge noted that the concern, from a preservation standpoint, is that whenever penetrations are made to a structure there is a potential for water damage, thus the proposal to regulate against placing the systems on the primary structures or accessory structures in the NCD. Mr. Lieberman spoke of the conflict of weighing energy efficiency against historical preservation. Mr. Tomten spoke of the likelihood of technology changing so rapidly that the regulations will have to be modified frequently. Mr. Bracht asked about plans for getting public input. Mr. Pogge said the regular ordinance public hearing process would be followed, with public hearings at the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Bracht said he thought it was important for the City to have guidelines such as proposed so problems, such as the one that prompted the Council to ask staff to look at regulating solar collectors, don't start showing up in historic neighborhoods. Mr. Tomten said he would have less a problem with the proposal for guidelines in the historic district, than creating an ordinance for regulating those outside of the NCD. Mr. Pogge said staff's recommendation for outside of the NCD is not to regulate collectors on the principal structure and require any freestanding units to meet required setbacks and not be located in a front yard or street -facing side yard. Ms. Cook asked about size restrictions; Mr. Pogge said there are no size restrictions other than the requirement that it cannot be taller than what is allowed for an accessory structure in a particular zoning district. Mr. Tomten noted that cities can no longer grant variances so it is important that what is enacted as an ordinance won't have unforeseen consequences, such as banning solar collectors in some circumstances. Ms. Cook said she support energy conservation, but expressed concern about visual impacts; she agreed this is likely more important for the NCD. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the proposal as it relates to the Neighborhood Conservation District. Mr. Bracht seconded the motion. Mr. Tomten said he would support the motion, but still would have some trepidation about moving outside of the NCD as an ordinance. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Zahren asked for input regarding a graffiti art project. He said he had talked to people from the Franconia Sculpture Garden about a graffiti art project being done there. He said one possibility is to place 4x8 removable panels along the eastern side of his building, utilizing the panels for 90 days as allowed for temporary signs; he said graffiti artists from Minneapolis would put together a mural, utilizing historical content, but done in graffiti style. Mr. Zahren said graffiti art is a culture that is becoming more popular for serious artists and becoming a legitimate art form. He said the art department at the high school and the Perpich Center for the Arts High School are very interested in the project. He noted that a similar project was done at Fargo and folks in the community are supportive. He spoke of the importance of an educational component to the project, letting kids know it is not OK to tag a building, but that graffiti is a legitimate art form. Mr. Johnson said he thought it would work as an event in conjunction with the Art Festival, but expressed concern about using the building in question as it is a prominent feature of the viewshed and the panels will appear to be actually painted on the building, even though it is a removable board; he also spoke of the possible negative view of the community in light of the vandalism tagging that has been going on. Mr. Zahren spoke of being more creative and more diverse and the opportunity to add the educational piece for students. Mr. Johnson again suggested that, at least for the first year, have this an event in the park and see what the response is before making it a semi -permanent project. Ms. Cook said she was open to new ideas, but spoke of her frustration in dealing with the non -legal aspect of graffiti and said she agreed with Mr. Johnson that it would make sense to do this as part of the Art Festival. Mr. Lieberman said he would not be afraid to try this and said he thought it might be a way of channeling young people's artistic talent. Mr. Lieberman invited several students in the audience to take part in the discussion. One of the students said she liked the idea of providing a different view of art and displaying that where everyone can see it. Another student stated he wouldn't see anything wrong if an historical context is used in the project; another student said he thought it would be interesting and said he would go to see what it was all about. Mr. Johnson reiterated his position. Mr. Tomten said he thought the space might be conducive to a project, emphasizing the educational aspect and promoting a moving art in -progress event. Mr. Lieberman spoke in favor of taking art out of stuffy little rooms and opening it up to other perspectives. Mr. Zahren said he wasn't looking to do something permanent on the building. He said the artists would come and give a presentation, with a visual of what the project will look like. Mr. Bracht also spoke of emphasizing the educational component of how damaging tagging can be to the masonry of historic buildings. No action was taken. Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Johnson, moved to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 4 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: December 28, 2010 PROPERTY OWNER: Tim and Amy McKee APPLICANT: Mark Balay REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a residential duplex LOCATION: 607 4th St S HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 3, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planned CASE NO.: 11-04 BACKGROUND Tim and Amy McKee, property owners of 607 4th St S, are requesting a demolition permit for the existing residential duplex on the property. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District. In the future, any new structure would require a NCD design review permit. The current structure was built in 1880 according to the Washington County Assessor's office. Currently the McKee's own the home immediately north of this site at 601 4th St S. The intent of the property owner is to use the property at 607 4th St S to expand their current yard. Subject House 607 4th St S Demolition Permit Page 2 Additionally, city code does not permit an accessory structure on a lot without a primary structure. The RB zoning district permits only one garage over 120 square feet and one shed 120 square feet in size or smaller per property. Therefore the garage will need to be demolished. The garage was built in 1982 and later expanded in 1986; thus the garage is not subject to demolition review. Long term, the applicant plans to complete some renovations to their home at 601 4th St S and would like to use the garage as storage during the renovation. The City has permitted property owners to keep noncompliant accessory structures for a limited amount of time in cases like this as so long as they provide an escrow that will cover the structures demolition. In this case, the applicant needs to provide an escrow of $1,500 to cover the structure's demolition based on the quote from their demolition contractor. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant is requesting consideration of a demolition permit for the existing duplex on the site. EVALUATION Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review. Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... This structure was built in 1880 according to the Washington County Assessor's office making it more than 50 years old, which makes it potentially historically significant and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission before it can be demolished. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items that must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; This information is included and is attached at Exhibit "A". (3) Photographs of all building elevations; This information is included in the attached application. 607 4th St S Demolition Permit Page 3 (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The entire structure is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant included a bid from Mark Wendt Construction to renovate the structure. The scope of work in the quote lists a number of items to be addressed including gutting the entire home, installing a new foundation, addition new appliances and new fixtures. The total cost to complete the renovation is estimated to be $237,000. The home at 607 4th St S is 2,032 square feet of living space according to the Washington County Assessor's office. It is difficult to evaluate the economic justification criteria for any demolition. In most cases, a historic renovation will cost more than a demolition and new construction. Additionally it is impossible to set the value a demolished structure has on the fabric of a neighborhood once it is lost. With that said, a similar sized home (2,109 square feet) that was rebuilt at 702 Churchill St W was sold on December 3, 2010 for $330,000. The property at 607 4th St S was purchased for $82,000 by the McKee's on December 14, 2010. With repairs estimated to be $237,000 the total investment in the property would be $319,000. There would appear to be a market for the home with that value therefore the data supplied by the McKee's may not support the economic justification criteria for a demolition at this time. (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant stated in their application that they plan to incorporate the vacant lot as green space as part of their home at 601 4th St S. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Low/Medium Density Residential and is zoned RB, two-family residential. Using the site as green space the site would have 2.7 units per acre and thus would not met the density requirements of 4.4 to 9.7 units per acre outlines in the City's comprehensive plan for area designated as LMDR. Using the site as green space the site would met the requirements of the RB zoning district. This site is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District. Any new structure in the future would be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant includes a number of alternatives to demolition; however, they generally note that none of the alternatives are feasible. 607 4th St S Demolition Permit Page 4 (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The structure was listed for sale on Craig's List, Ebay and Stillwater Gazette. Copies of these ads are included in the packet. The applicant has included a report from Mr. Mark Balay. A copy has been included in the packet. Mr. Balay noted that the building would not be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places nor the City's Landmark Homes Program. Staff is agreement with these findings. Mr. Balay also noted that he could not find any cultural significance for the structure. Staff does believe that the home could be eligible for listing on the City's Heirloom Home program which follows a lower standard than the National register of Historic Places and the Landmark Homes program. ALTERNATIVES The HPC has several alternatives related to this request: A. Approve. If the proposed demolition request is found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. Prior to demolition of the principal structure, the applicant shall establish an escrow in the amount of $1,500 to cover the demolition of the existing garage. The garage shall be demolished within two years of the demolition of the primary structure. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the demolition rules then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your February 7, 2011 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is February 14, 2011. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Permit No. Demolition Request Permit Fee $150* Receipt No. Address of Project: (007 4T S-P ,_Uitr Parcel No.:.2 S .0 . 7n , �! StT6'1�/IS1otO ff Lot a4.1(. , . Subdivision C3-1Co1 h�94L--ri,U t\1 ��L1yksJs1 Applicant: U TS C.- Address:Telephone No.: Owner if different than Applicant: , 6c- ►S Address: 60 4-4-k -SI‘ Telephone No. to of Structure: Age of Structure:__ Condition of Structure: \AYT %cam t ti7J Intended Use of Site after Demolition: 'F 1 S1(U (c)-Y- Signature of Ap !cant Signature of Ow &// /e) Date ,////4 "77/ Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: o Approved City Planner/Community Development Director O Denied Date Amy and Tim McKee 601 Fourth St. South Stillwater, MN 55082 12/16//10 City of Stillwater Attn: Michel Pogge 216 N. Fourth St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Pogge and Heritage Preservation Commission Members: Attached are your requested application materials for demolition of the residence at 607 Fourth St. South, which was constructed , according to the tax assessors records, in 1880. We intend to remove only the house structure from the property. The garage and driveway will remain. The house at 607 Fourth St. South has been rental property for all of the 14 years we have owned our home next door. We were able to purchase the property after the completion of the foreclosure process earlier this year. Well before, and during, the foreclosure process the condition of the house deteriorated, because it was unoccupied and vandalized. Our house, at its closest point, is separated by only 4 feet from this structure. While we were concerned about the deterioration, we were without a means to control the ongoing actions of others on this adjacent property. We are somewhat disappointed that our efforts to find a reuse for the existing house on another property met with failure, but the existing condition of the house, potential cost of renovation, and moving costs have not been desirable enough, in this current economy, to attract a buyer. We have complied fully with the requirements to obtain a demolition permit per section 34-5.1 from the City of Stillwater Building Demolition Section of the City Code as follows: 1) please see attached maps labeled 'A' 2) see attached Legal description labeled `B' 3) see photos attached 4) The entire house and foundation will be removed 5) It is not economically feasible to relocate or renovate the structure from its existing deteriorated condition. Please see the attached renovation cost estimate from Mark Wendt Construction (labeled `C") which greatly exceeds the potential market value of a 2,000 square foot home, be it on this property or any other. page 2 6) The re -use plan is to utilize the separate property as additional landscape, yard and service space for our current home next door. As you know, we successfully renovated the historic carriage house with your assistance and guidance, avoiding demolition of that historic accessory structure. We plan to remove the house before spring and fully redevelop the yard next summer. 7) Our neighborhood block is entirely residential and shall remain so with this project. This fully supports the current comprehensive plan and zoning requirements. 8) We examined the possibilities of re -locating this house further south on the lot to provide more yard to our house. We also looked for any individual willing to remove the house from our property to another lot for $150.00. Based upon current economic conditions neither turned out to be desirable. 9) The property has been advertised on Craig's List , local Ebay, and in the Stillwater Gazette for removal. In addition, as your application packet suggests, we have had our architect examine and research all historical aspects for the house to determine any architectural significance in regards to architectural style, occupancy, or occurrence and have found very little. A report of his research efforts are attached for your review. We request that you review these materials, and issue our permit. Please do not hesitate contacting us prior to your meeting if you have any questions, You are welcome to come and observe the existing conditions of both our properties at 601 and 607 Fourth St. South. Sincerely, Amy and im McKee Enc. Northstar MLS Matrix Page 1 of 1 A�C •tA D 4 W P.%2t 1\)(94:a-r-H/ Zoo To __DL),-rti/ pr) 1::-z?AnDiE. (2a9irr, ot,) --r14 http://matrix.northstarmis. com/Matrix/Public/InteractiveMapPopup.aspx?RecordID=3579... 12/16/2010 Mark S. Balay, RA S t i l i w a t e r M i n n e s o t a 110 East Myrtle Street, Suite 100 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (651) 430-3312 Michael E. Balay, RA I n d i a n a p o l i s i n d i a n a 8878 South Street Fishers, Indiana 46038 (317) 845-9402 12/1/10 Research and Report on the Cultural and Architectuctural Significance of 607 S. Fourth St., Stillwater Sources 1/ Stillwater Library St. Croix Collection materials and files 2/ Historical Sanborn Insurance Maps 3) Stillwater City Directories 4) various biographical references Architectural Significance Analysis This house is balloon framed in circular saw cut wood, with square nails and a local limestone foundation( in need of repair). This supports the approximate 1880 date from the tax record for the date of construction. The historical Sanborn insurance maps in the St. Croix collection provided snapshots of the property during its entire life span. We have attached a partial copy of the 1898 map for your reference. While neighboring houses, porches, and accessory structures have changed periodically the main body of the house has remained the same since it was constructed. The general three dimensional shape of the house indicates it was conservative in quality for the time it was built. There is very little historical fabric of ornamentation and detail remaining in and outside the house, to further a design style description. Most of the detail has been either removed leaving some indication of where it was, or replaced with simpler functional materials in the life of the house. The National Register requires that a property be a distinct and stand out existing example of a historical architectural style to be considered under this category. Unfortunately, the surviving architectural signature of this house will not even be of interest for the recently established, local designation of "Landmark Home" page 2 Cultural Significance Analysis There are three main ways to look for the cultural significance of this home based upon occurrence or occupant, deed records, city directories, and historical archives. We have examined two of the three. In the context period of Stillwater History we were able to attach the surnames of Lohmer, Kuhlman and Whalen to the house. In referring to historical archives we found this houses image in one picture involving a courthouse function, but nothing close enough to give us a confirmation of a significant resident or occurrence , or add to our knowledge of the original architectrual detail of this housel. This house will not qualify for the national register based upon these contexts. The loss of any part of the "whole", being the entire 19th and early 20th century housing stock in Stillwater, is a point that needs to be looked at carefully in a town like Stillwater, where it is important to maintain that critical mass of historic housing that makes Stillwater an important remaining icon of the 19th century in Minnesota. In historical appraisal of this house, I can see very little to justify the historical preservation value that would be necessary to offset the extreme costs of an overall historical renovation of this house. There is also very little to base restorative practices on because of little detailed historic fabric remains of what was there. I n d i a n a p o I i s t o d i a n a 8 A L A Still w a ter Minnesota ARCHITECTS oURT Ha cA k x 50' 601'4 / r / / yy //y Y1, , w reeo S.4'r" 603 6// 6 /3 6/2 ST. 4 2/6'2 622,4 L / x 1, t 2/972 . Washington County Assessor - General Parcel Info Page 1 of 2 I f Washington County Assessor General Information Pin: 28.030.20.43.0066 Address: 607 4TH ST S STILLWATER MN 55082 Class: Residential Map Area: Stillwater MFR PART OF 045 BEG AT PT IN E LINE OF 4TH ST IN SD ORIGINAL TOWN OF STILLWATER 100FT S OF NW COR OF SD BLK 45 & RUNNING THN E ON LINE PAR WITH N LINE OF SD BLK 110FT TO PT THN N ON LINE Legal: PAR WITH E LINE OF SD 4TH ST 50FT TO PT THN W ON LINE PAR WITH N LINE OF SD BLK 110FT TOE LINE OF SD 4TH ST & THN S ON SD E LINE OF SD 4TH ST 50FT TO PLACE OF BEG SubdivisionName STILLWATER BLOCKS 38-46 Block 45 SubdivisionCd 10694 Prior Year Value Information Year Land Value Dwelling Value Improvement Value Total Value 2010 80,300 119,200 0 199,500 2009 81,000 131,200 0 212,200 2008 80,000 143,100 0 223,100 2007 80,000 129,300 0 209,300 2006 82,700 111,700 0 194,400 2005 80,000 108,100 0 188,100 2004 57,200 117,400 0 174,600 2003 47,300 114,100 0 161,400 2002 40,000 105,000 0 145,000 2001 35,000 96,100 0 131,100 2000 31,200 89,200 0 120,400 r�� iuiq•Aiduia/mmuzoo•goarasalvid•Zsdeuvpdm File No: 6'"C�' Minnesota Abstract & Titie Site Inspection Sheet 1010 Dale SL No St Paul, Ma M117 Phone: 661-4880300 Fa= 651-488.0200 on Date: I/V f /in By: r P, al _1 ao Int • • ‘.0) tom) duplex Mud 1 tsr. Mu vt;L rrom current lot http://minneapolis.craigslist. org/wsh/reo/211709323 5.htt minneapolis craigslist > washington/WI > housing > real estate - email this posting to a friend by owner Stating a discriminatorypreference in a housing; post is illegal - please flag discriminatory posts as prohibited Avoid scams and fraud by dealing locally! Beware any arrangement involving Western Union, Moneygram, wire transfer, or a landlord/owner who is out of the country or cannot meet you in person. More info $150 / 2br -1880 duplex MUST BE MOVED from current lot (Stillwater) please flag with care: j, mi scategori zed prohibited spam/overpost best of craigslist Date: 2010-12-16, 11:07PM CST Reply to: hous-n4sdr-2117093235@craigslist.org [E'T°IS when replying to ads?] Up/down duplex with unfinished basement and attic, 1 br/ba in each unit. Wood construction, newer roof, 2032 total sq ft. Buyer must relocate entire house away from its current lot within 30 days of purchase. • Location: Stillwater • it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests PostinglD:: 2117093235 Copyright ® 2010 craigslist, inc. terms of use privacy policy feedback forum 1 of l 12/17/2010 9:56 AM -r T -r ♦ saw.. No ...saw Lflasfga... elm Free, Friendly, Local Free Classifieds in Minneapolis -St. Paul dense ( What are you looking fort Register I SSin in I Manage my ads I Wit 1 All Categories j In All Minneapolis -St Paul Or j ZIP Code, (Sty or Address lj miles eBayy ClassifiedsMirteapolis-St. Paul Housing Homes for sale 1880 duplex for sale TO BE MOVED from current location - $150 (StiNwater) View larger image Here are some similar ads $198,500 $229,000 Duplex in St. Paul near Lake Duplex Near Downtown White Cui-de-Sac Location Close to a Great Location! Close to Park Phalan - Fully Rented - Positive Bear Lake Fugy Rented - Make School! and Walking Trails! Pooled: 11/08/10 Poe d: 12/1W10 Poet° 11/02/10 Pooled: 09/04/10 Posted by: Unregistered user 1 View ale ads Active since 12/2010 Post_y_our FREE ad Flag this Ad Details for 1880 duplex for sale TO BE MOVED from current location Address: Stillwater, MN, Stiflwater, MN 55082 (map) Date Posted: 12/16/10 Bedrooms: 2 Bathrooms: 2 Size (sq ft): 2032 Year Bulk: 1880 Description Up/down duplex with unfinished basement and attic, 1 br/ba in each unit. Wood construction, newer roof. Buyer must relocate entire house away from its current let within 30 days of purchase. AdID: 7957000 Share gri t i More Like Sign Up to see what liar Mends Hoe, $144,900 Why let 1880 dtploctor We TO BE MCNED from current location an eBay Clowifeds? Ins Free, Friendly 8 Local Help Abaft 8bp Mobile Apes Priwcy Poicy Terms of Use Content Ue Popular Searches Tatar Facebook Copyright O 2007 - 2010 ION inlema/orel United $184,900 Need help? ;ust contact Customer Su000rt 1 of 1 12/17/2010 9:39 AM Mark D. Wendt Construction 142 Boutwell Court Stillwater, MN 55082 651-351-0939 ATR\clit-i-Ekrt Stillwater, Minnesota Dec. 17, 2010 Tim and Amy McKee 601 4th St. S. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Proposal- Page 1 of 2 Scope of work for whole house renovation: 607 4th St. S., Stillwater, Mn. 1. Completely strip:out interior, adhering to new lead rules. 2. Disconnect utilities 3. Lift building up and temporarily support.\, 4. Remove old foundation and excavate for complete basement 5. Pour new footings with drain tile, construct new foundation walls using ICF system. 6. Pour new basement slab 7. Reset building 8. Repair structure as needed, engineering by others 9. Bring staircases up to code 10. Tear off roof, repair soffit and fascia, add ventilators and soffit venting to code, re -roof with Timberline 30 year shingles. 11. New HVAC, wiring and plumbing. 12. Replace existing double hung window sash with new wood insulated glass inserts from A -Craft (1 3/8°) 13. New exterior doors with storm doors. 14. New interior doors, 6panel fir. 15. Spray foam walls to R-19, blow fiberglass in attic to R-38 16. New drywall with smooth ceilings. 17. New trim using backband system, lx4 base with ogee, clear pine. 18. New cabinetry and laminate counters 19. New Energy Star appliances 20. New bath fixtures 21. Scrape loose paint off siding, encapsulate, sand as needed. Replace rotted siding as needed, prime out, apply 2 topcoats. Restore and retain existing trim. Licensed • Bonded • insured Lic # BC 20195081 Mark D. Wendt Construction 142 Boutwell Court Stillwater, MN 55082 651-351-0939 Stillwater, Minnesota Dec. 17, 2010 Tim and AmY McKee Page 2 of 2 22. Apply cement "parging" to above grade portions of ICF foundation. 23. Dispose of all waste materials generated by this project. Price for above noted items: $237,000.00 Two Hundred Thirty Seven Thousand Dollars. Payment Schedule: 25% to start ‘ 25% when framing inspection is complete 25% when drywall is in and exterior completed Balance upon completion and Certificate of Occupancy Permits are an extra cost, and will be billed at cost. Mechanics Lien Notice: ANY PERSON OR COMPANY SUPPLYING LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY MAY FILE A LIEN AGAINST YOUR PROPERTY IF THAT PERSON OR COMPANY IS NOT PAID FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTION. UNDER MINN LAW YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PAY PERSONS -'WHO SUPPLIED LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THIS IMPROVEMENT DIRECTLY AND DEDUCT THIS AMOUNT FROM OUR MIT: - CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD THE AMOUNTS DUE THEM FROM US UNTIL 120 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY THOSE PERSONS WHO SUPPLIED ANY LABOR OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU TIMELY NOTICE. INITIALS: Submitted: ;Ka �,4�w,e /) _, 7 /' Accepted: Licensed • Bonded • Insured Lic # BC 20195081 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: December 27, 2010 CASE NO.: 11-01 APPLICANT: Mary Beth Johnson, A'Solanna REQUEST: Design Review of proposed lighting for A'Solanna LOCATION: 225 Chestnut St E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: January 3, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner j1 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of lighting for their exiting sign at 225 Chestnut St E for A'Solanna. The lighting arms are proposed to be black goose neck style lights. The applicant has verbally indicated to staff that they will be mounted on the black band just above the sign. Additionally, they have verbally agreed to paint the wiring conduit to match the adjacent building colors. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage. 3. All exterior conduit shall be painted to match the adjacent building colors. attachments: Applicant's Form and Photo of existing building ue'.eruyer r , cull/ Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Mary Beth Johnson A'salonna 225 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 RE. LETTER OF INTENT TO INSTALL EXTERIOR SIGNAGE LIGHTING To whom it may concern, Attached please find the Design Review Application to install exterior signage lighting to A'salonna located at 225 East Chestnut Street Our intent is to install three (3) exterior lighting fixtures to illuminate our existing signage. Respectfully Submitted, Mary Beth Johnson Proprietor DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Z2 c fvu?"" b Assessor's Parcel No. 260,302100 if (R aired) Zoning District Description of Project in detail �x 1 ORL l� Sr�A' '' Pit Pt t1-9-i0 /VA19 "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct, 1 further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not propertyd. owner, then property owner's signature is reauire Property Owner Cr 1 1 y1941I-I &K Representative/fr'y 1 1. 114 SVf% Mailing Addressi e• /&t?) 16 f ¥ Mailing Address Z2 6 4r C id-c(r Sr City State Zip CPA' T P4ii t I I N. 'Si rCity State Zip C L-kt/ 47. M N SIV 62 Telephone No. 1 No. ‘ 5I �' T equired) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review perm t.wpd July 13, 2005 • o, $ w .--.,.....,. J.i.- -&J 'JI ., wuui t_u..-n'Jtx)SCIlecK Arm Page 1 of 1 Home Cl-arance Lighting Barn Lighting 12" Emblem Shade in 119- Bronze with HL-H Gooseneck Arm 12" Emblem Shade in 119- Bronze with HL-H Gooseneck Arm 12" Emblem Shade in 119- Bronze with HL-H Gooseneck Arm Click to enlarge Description 12" Shade Size: W 12" x H 12" Mounting: HL-H Gooseneck Arm Finish: 119- Bronze Max Wattage Per Socket: 200W Standard Incandescent (Bulb Not Included) Number Of Sockets: 1 UL Location: Rated For Wet Locations CODE: H-EM-G-12/HL-H- List Price: $293 00 Price: $234.20 You save: $58.80 (2001 In stock: Quantity: Like Sign Up tc Product Features http://www.barnlightelectric.com clearance-lighting/discounted-barn-lighting/12-emblem-s... 12/7/2010 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: December 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Crosstown Signs Dz-- CASE NO.: 11-0 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage and overhead for Atlas Pet Store LOCATION: 1798 Market Drive COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: BPC - Business Park Commercial ZONING: C - Commercial HPC DATE: January 3, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner MY DISCUSSION Building Signage The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a new wall sign for Atlas Pet at 1979 Market Drive. Building signage is proposed to be on both the Market Drive and Curve Crest Drive sides of the building. On Curve Crest Drive, the sign will comprise of red "Atlas Pet" channel letters that are proposed to be internally lit. This sign will be 5 feet tall by 10.88 feet wide for a total of 54.4 square feet in size. Adjacent to it will be red non -internally lit channel letters that read "Food Supplies Pets" This set of lettering is proposed to be a total of 1 foot tall by 19.4 feet wide total area of 19.4 square feet. The total signage along curve crest is 73.8 square feet and Atlas Pets occupies a total of 77 feet facing Curve Crest Drive. Along Market Drive, they are proposing red non -internally lit channel letters that read "Atlas Pets Wild Bird Self Pet Wash Fish Pets Food Supplies". These signs will be a total of 1.25 foot tall by 62.33 feet wide total area of 77.9 feet of signage. Atlas Pets occupies 78 feet facing Market Drive. 1798 Market Drive Page 2 For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line' The proposed signage meeting this requirement. s� Overhead Joor During a review of the signage, staff noticed an overhead door that was recently installed on the building facing Market Drive without design review approval. Staff contacted the building owner who explained that they plan to paint overhead door and block to match the adjacent building color. It would have been appropriate to have reused the old block to fill in around the door; however, it has already been disposed of. At this point painting the brick and door to match is the best alternative available. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. The brick and overhead door shall be painted to match the adjacent building colors. 4. All future exterior building changes requires HPC approval prior to any work being completed. FINDINGS The proposed signs and overhead door as conditioned meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign Photo of the overhead door iiec i r utu j:'iaI-II'I t-I I Li-ib-Yt I -- rb.jr .310/IJ p,1 Property Owner Representative Mailing Address ' 13'41 i ii"t'*- t - Nam? Meting Addle CJty State Zip l ryrcisu t? r4 W)iu 55304f City State Zip Telephone No. S `r�- tl Ca a rat DESIGN REV1 ARC I TIOR FORM CO M . y ' is LOPMEMT DEPAR OF 210Tii L ATER, MN 55082 The applicant b , . risible for the co eness and accuracy of an forma arid supporting material submitted In oennee#Ion with any application. Photos, sketches and a hatter of intent 10 required. A11 supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with rap .. - tlon becomes the property of the City of ptlllwarter. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is mu After Heritage ation approval,, there b a 14 ° y ap appeal period has ended, the applicant will y a design be signed end submitted to the City to obtain the requl All following hfamratbn b bd. Once the 10-day permit which mast buliding permits. .a6 1 r c 'f{ +0 ,k,f l' PROPERTY '-'PT! £14-ce.1 Address of Project .l 79' ll r €t DAsse s ar's Parcel No. 3? U 3 O - i 'C3 - 3 003i Zoning DiStritt - Desch ption of Project in detail. _ . .... wl� sv r state the !Otago*: <. daC and at dates led here e : h oaf - 4 to the hest of my Imo I itrrtrhar cierth)' 1 DWI I co with the f to be true If It Is granted and used° If representative b not property owner, then property owner's signature is i 3C7 $ip+nxlneWas n r.gewpermltii April t2, 2002 I ' d :01 �.-` r_+ —2 7 - .:20 gtea-9T-olaa Ead Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 n_of_ Address AppllcanY, Nam�jw/�2,lvwo/, ner r, City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Ct,i7 �11�� Na` e _ ,5 C� Add ss //.' A, ContraCtl Attached are the following doc Phone 74/2 Ph PeZ33,t, ents (Required to be submitted with application) ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign. etails: Sign Size: Dimensions: = Square Feet' Sign Height: (If freestanding) Setbacks: From Property Line Illumination: ❑ Yes Declaration From Bldg From Drive ay/Parking Lot Mater /��_ " „Igu,„1,60,c_.. If Yes, Type: I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or empl. - - .f it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is is . ed rel. ted to this request. * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 exe „__ce/eA LacatiOh 0 /��.CCC✓L Address /79 Marie- "Akanfi Name ,,C�rL,�.ib rgi Owner,(if dt reiPt m Name ontrrjtor's ! Name City Stillwater • pp!iCara s Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 State MN Phone # Zip 55082 Zip Phone # - �r l Zip d y Attached are the following ddcuments (Required to be submitted with application) ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require des gn review by HPC. Sign Size: Dimensions: Setbacks: From Property Line Colors: Illumination: vcfles Declaration From Bldg o No = Squar!Qe 4e trpc Sign Height: (If freestanding) From riveway/Parking Lot • Materials:g�/ 74A4�Lt-- If Yes, Type:�`�� I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best • y k •wledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or e t•loye- o it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is suet. ed to this request. (required) Condition for apprbv/ te ate Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: December 27, 2010 CASE NO.: 11-03 APPLICANT: Kurt Klitzke, Airmed Biologics, Inc REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Airmed Biologics, Inc LOCATION: 1815 Greeley St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: I - Industrial ZONING: BP -I Business Park Industrial HPC DATE: January 3, 2011 REVIEWED BY: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 14 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for two new wall signs for Airmed Biologics, Inc at 1815 Greeley St S. The signs are proposed to be located above the main entrance and above their delivery area. The signs are proposed to be a flat wall sign made of aluminum with vinyl coating and lettering. The sign will contain the words "Airmed" in blue, "Biologics, Inc." in red on a white background with a black boarder. Each sign is 6 feet wide by 2 feet tall for a total of 12 square feet. The sign is not proposed to be lit. For wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant has 78 feet facing Greeley St S, which allows a 78 square foot wall sign on the front of the building facing Greeley St S. The two signs are below this threshold. Generally properties are limited to one wall sign; however, in planning case 1999-46, a variance was granted to permit two signs for this space. 1815 Greeley St S Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. No sign lighting unless approved by the HPC. FINDINGS As conditioned and with the approved variance, the proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/ photo of the proposed sign DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required, Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 181S 5T Assessor's Parcel No. 33.o3[J.2,0,32.o003 SV�`f�S 34ry (Required) Zoning District ? P — j Description of Project in detail Re4(.44C * �K �STi,YUG S-J Gyk9S Cx2) WtTK ikt - $ika t8 vi-t-PtA►kN tut.ye To Ei)c 2T C' 1(jck5 cvkiS 5-C�yv2S PtR.t a'aCrd' (lzC'+. 61) ��►� tA)6- Toe 213 of �;X�sT2vt�G- Si c.,1JA(,-L fon) p'V� Re4LACe: -rt—t StcovNAD . 6,6u 14►er 14'CTi4C-HlS1) -to �(3L'QG, " I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct,. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner Sls Grist- t-f sr L C, Representative (\TAM6101-O&tc.3 , a'e/OL Mailing Address 13 Al C=O'E. AVE' b Mailing Address g15 &PEEL ? 5l 50 Sc t :-T S 344 City State Zip MAPLE v3o0-0 v4&) SSlcly City State Zip STE.U.A.A)A1 EZ t MO $So 82 Telephone No. G5! ' -f0`I - 12 Signature , Application for Sign Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address SN,;,'rE5 1 b 15 GRE:EIZY Si So 3acL( City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Applicant Name KwRT KLi. r KL Fox ATA ME.D e 01.136icS i ry G Phone # Address Ins- s~ 6aeeLEN ST 50 1 City S l %.LtrW ATER State AD Zip SSn $ 2 Owner (if different from Applicant) Name 1 S IS G RC Ec.Eq ST 1_.1..C. Phone # i a s cCit c�PL Ave LEy�''lAQt ►000J te Starn►v Zip, 0 Contractor's Name Name A-CRI'vIED '(3t,01..0(sLGS j gli0 . . '7+r 7ST4U.C'.!I') Phoneei . Address t$tS& ELEY sr ,Sp CityST u_uovkl—E7 - StateVv Zip 0$Z ached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park reauir Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: O t X 6 1 = Square 1F eet Sign Heigtit/(freestanding) Lot /(� lr ►4TZ"ACi /cl(� Setbacks: From Property Line et-oG ►4 f I►'ECNCO From Bldg 6LIAG kfl 4cHcp From Driveway/Parkin t3t Colors: Matey als: Illumination: ❑ Yes /No If Yes, Type: A 1) AL eciaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed seasonable time before and after any permit is is ed to the requ Vl.fl.- - /2 677 ,o/n Owner Signature (required) Date Applicant Signature Review (For office use only) ❑ Approved Permit # ❑ Denied Date By Date 2, / 7 o2 O/ C7 Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 lnnovaGraft Biologics, LLC Intelligent Biologic Design 1815 Greeley Street South, Suite 3 Soum t 6 Oue9. CAA RPSt'Y( St ►') 3 to I PR0,P05�;.0 Sz(, ).1)( �, tt--t 1 (3t..30(7 (k CAC-lc_tJ MRTH A)14 PRE\rco .S S-CGvv 9 ' X' s e t-z'✓MOUE. tD 9RoPoseb S tG4 N A. 1)( 6' e it-i' e LQ G Ri-r (kc- k- t p Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: December 27, 2010 APPLICANT: Marty Larson CASE NO.: 11-05 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Uncommon Age LOCATION: 450 Main St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: January 3, 2011 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner:f DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 450 Main St N for Uncommon Age. The sign is proposed to contain the words "Uncommon Age Neural Training Studio" in white letters on a black background. The "U" logo is white on a light blue background. The sign will have a light blue border. The sign is 8 feet wide by 2.5 feet tall for a total of 20 square feet in area. The sign will be non -illuminated. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 70 feet long facing Main St N. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 20 square feet, which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 250 Main St N Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without HPC approval. 3. No exterior lighting on the sign without HPC approval. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building Application for Sion Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Address qsv Nhli -F City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 NaiRett4-17 Leirrdlel (Un&nmon 7 :J c'S-Mr/r- AdtreA Ai Phorkne # � N ZiR3002 Name Phone # Address City State Zip Name l` ( / _ c,5,05 Address- 21-r1 '7!2reF� Phone�17^ vi ` Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) f zaps-VD1 7 ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Size: Dimensions: Setbacks: From Property X 32 Line From Bldg = Square Feet Sign Height (If freestanding) From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: 314 e I ig ( c Illumination: ❑ Yes N.No c✓Ll�fe Matenals: 74 Q % UY p/7cooct If Yes, Type: Declaration 1 hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. 1 hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the pr sed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued re twd to thi ti. uest Review D ApI Pence:# ‘,—;?/- ---€ Date * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is requited. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project L/SD /V i114r1q Assessor's Parcel No. (Requited) Zoning District Description of Project in detail t'✓t?Av C4 1/41K 7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct I further calif I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner 14/13 5 Ck)c, - Representative �1ft/ /rOY\ Mailing Address 4/0/ �cL f N. Mailing Address &� /V ?`� M City State Zip f 71f i« / Ji�,--City State Zip ' %fr f Nszg2 Telephone No. 6 i &SI—L .�'�Signature / v t (Required) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Too/Too E 6L09-6£17- 99 xud JuluATIT3S moa'laminqqpiptuAlTtraJaa3uATTT3s XVd1 g°:01 OTOZ/LT/gi O 1 0 en 1 1/40 . i f Z C7 l O • i T c 0 E E O E O AV V/ i 0 E E O E ant Sign, New Richmond, VV Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission December 20, 2010 Just a quick note asking if Trinity Lutheran Church could come and visit with the HPC at its next meeting, January 3. Trinity is working with Hammel, Green and Abrahamson in the preliminary stages of designing an expansion of Trinity's current facility. It is a significant project for Trinity, and will take place on the site of the current USPS facility. It will have a great impact on Stillwater as well. Because of the importance of this project, we would like to visit with the HPC early in the design process — we are currently done with needs analysis, programming and block planning, but have stopped short of massing and exterior design. This expansion will be of significant size, possibly up to 15,000 square feet, and will put a new public face on Trinity, a new major entrance, learning spaces, gathering spaces and a new "black box" type venue that will be open for community theatre and other fine arts purposes. We think that Trinity will continue to be a major host of the arts in Stillwater (over 30 community performances in 2010) as we add this state of the art performance venue. Trinity's greatest need is to express the nature and mission of the church in a way that is transparent, open, welcoming and engaging to the community at large. Trinity, as a faith community, is open and engaging — we will be striving to find design options that express that nature. That is why we would truly appreciate an early and open conversation with the HPC to see what counsel might be provided by the HPC to pursue design approaches that are not predictable extensions of the existing church architecture, but would instead better reflect Trinity's openness, welcome, and relevance. • I look forward to visiting with you and having a great conversation. I had coffee with Roger Tomten recently, and he suggested this way of moving forward together. I am grateful for this possibility. Peace, Pastor Dan Poffenberger Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner �lr Date: December 28, 2010 Re: Demolition ordinance review Message: As planned at the HPC's retreats this summer, staff is beginning a review of the City's demolition ordinance over the winter months as requested by the Commission. Staff is working with volunteer and law student James Hanneman on compiling information on various demolition codes that are seen throughout the state as part of this discussion. To get the work underway, Staff would like the HPC to form a small working committee that would review the material developed by Mr. Hanneman & City Staff and ultimately formulate a set of proposed changes, if any, the committee would recommend to the full HPC and City Council. Staff Recommendation Appoint up to three members to serve on a committee charged with reviewing the City's demolition ordinance. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP City Planner City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4t1, Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us