Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-07-07 HPC PacketHeritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Wednesday, July 7, 2010 The regular meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Wednesday, July 7, 2010, in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF June 7, 2010 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/DR/2010-11. Demolition request for the southern portion of a residence located at 1117 Broadway Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. George Middleton, applicant. Continued from the June 7, 2010 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/2010-12. Design review of signage for Ultima Bellezza Salon located at 105 3rd Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Mary Coleman, applicant. Continued from the June 7, 2010 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting. 5.02 Case No. DR/2010-21a. Design review of renovation of an existing manufacturing/office building for Early Childhood Family Center located at 1792,1850, 1862 Greeley St So and 1825 and 1845 Industrial Blvd in the BP-C, and BP -I Districts. Steve Erickson, BWBR, applicant. 5.03 Case No. DR/2010-23. Design review of signage for Fashion Boutique located at 308 Chestnut Street East in the CBD, Central Business District. Lies) Benson, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Stillwater Veterans Memorial plaque. 7.02 Presentation on the St. Paul HPC by Amy Spong, Staff Member to the City of Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission 7.03 Discussion related to 30-day temporary sign permits. 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair,John Brach, Micky Cook, Robert Goodman, Jeff Johnson, Jerry Krakowski and Roger Tomten Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Scott Zahren Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Tomten, seconded by Mr. Johnson, moved approval of the minutes of May 3, 2010. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DEM/DR/2010-11 Demotion request for the southern portion of a residence at 1117 Broadway St. N. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. George Middleton, applicant. Mr. Middleton was present and explained the request. He said the request is due to a desire to remodel the house and orient it in a more east -west direction to take advantage of some passive and active solar systems, as well as gain a bit more yard and have the potential, in the future, to sell one of the several Tots the house is situated on. Mr. Lieberman said, for him, the biggest issue is one of justification given, what he sees as, an incomplete application. Mr. Middleton explained that he did not include an ad to sell the property as he does not want to dispose of the property; he wants to dismantle a portion of the house and reuse the salvageable material in the renovation of the remaining house. Mr. Lieberman spoke of the issue of precedence. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Johnson noted three of the nine steps required by the ordinance seem to be lacking — information on the costs of renovating the home, more information on the proposed use/reuse, and the advertisement. Mr. Johnson suggested the possibility of continuing the request to the next meeting with a focus on completing the nine steps. Mr. Johnson moved to continue Case No. DEM/DR/2010-11 to the July 7 meeting. Mr. Brach seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Mr. Lieberman said he would be most interested in the plans for remodeling and whether the remodeling will alter the original integrity of the house. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/2010-12. Design review of signage for Ultima Bellezza Salon at 105 Third St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Mary Coleman, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Pogge said he had spent a lot of time with the applicant regarding sign options. He said visibility is an issue with this location. He said due to that issue, the applicant is proposing utilizing window signage along with window decals; he noted that according to ordinance, signage is allowed to cover up to one-third of the window area, anything above that amount requires a permit. Mr. Johnson noted the graphics don't include the business name but are a good way to identify the business type. Ms. Cook said she didn't like the proposed graphics and said she would hate to see this as a precedent. Mr. Tomten pointed out that the proposed business sign would have the same problem with visibility. There was 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 discussion as to options for roof signage or a sign above the door. Mr. Tomten drew a possible sign alternative. Mr. Johnson noted the applicant could cover up to one-third of the window space without a permit. Ms. Cook suggested inviting the applicant back to discuss possible alternatives, such as Mr. Tomten's suggestion. Mr. Tomten moved to table this request; Mr. Brach seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-13 Design review to reface an existing monument sign at 1700 Tower Drive in the BPO, Business Park Office District. Spectrum Signs, applicant. A representative of Spectrum Signs was present. Mr. Lieberman reviewed the request. Mr. Tomen moved to approve the request as submitted. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-14Design review of exterior modifications and signage at 101 Water St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Chuck Dougherty, applicant. Mr. Dougherty was present. He reviewed the request for signage, four signs — two signs for the Water Street Inn, one on Myrtle and another on Chestnut, a projecting sign for the pub, and another at the north entrance to the conference center. He provided color samples. Mr. Johnson questioned allowing two signs on the same elevation; Mr. Pogge noted the signage is for two separate uses, although the same owner. Mr. Tomten suggested lowering the height on the Chestnut/Water streets sign for the Inn as that might improve the visibility of the sign; Mr. Johnson agreed that lowering the sign between the sill bands would improve both the appearance and visibility. Mr. Lieberman agreed that the pub sign should be allowed as it does represent a separate entity. Mr. Johnson suggested that the conference center sign would fit better with the space if it is a bit lower in height and longer so it spans the width of the opening to the conference center. Ms. Cook suggested adding rounded end detail to the signs to be of a more historical appearance. Mr. Johnson moved approval of the signs are requested with the following modifications: the vertical oriented signs on the southwest corner of the building (Water and Chestnut) be lowered to fit within the second story elevation between the stone sill courses; that the signage at the Myrtle Street entrance to the conference center be lowered and lengthened so it matches the width of the doorway opening; that the ends of the signs be a rounded end detail; and that at the Myrtle Street entrance, three light fixtures be utilized rather than two. Mr. Johnson clarified that the background color of the sign be more of a darker green to match the trim on the building and that the Charlie's Pub projecting sign be reduced to 6 square feet. Mr. Brach questioned requiring three fixtures for the conference center sign if two might be sufficient; Mr. Johnson agreed to amend the motion to give the option of two or three light fixtures at that location, clarifying that the other signage not be lighted. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Mr. Dougherty described the proposed lighting improvements for the outdoor patio. He said they would utilize the same lights going around the outside of the patio; he said it may be necessary to add a couple of the lights to the middle of the patio. He said they are also proposing adding a pergola at the northwest corner of the patio area, as well as adding a door to an existing lattice storage area to get all the table storage out of sight. Mr. Johnson wondered whether there would be any issues related to a storage area under the fire escape; Mr. Pogge said that has not been an issue in previous fire inspections. Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the pergola and privacy wall's impact on the overall viewshed. Mt. Tomten suggested using the lattice rather than solid privacy wall; Mr. Johnson suggested utilizing seasonal screening, such as plantings. Mr. Johnson asked about the wattage of the lights; Mr. Dougherty said currently 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 they utilize 60 watt, fluorescent bulbs. Mr. Johnson expressed a concern about adding as many as the nine additional fixtures proposed and wondered whether there might be a smaller down - lit fixture that might provide the desired wash light for both the perimeter and interior of the patio; Mr. Dougherty said he could look at a different style fixture. Mr. Johnson moved to approve four additional fixtures within the interior space, rather than nine, and suggesting that the applicant look at a different type of fixture. Mr. Tomten seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Mr. Johnson clarified that the string lights will come down in exchange for the additional patio lighting and asked that be a condition of approval; Mr. Dougherty said he will likely be coming back to the Commission with a request for additional lighting as he does not believe four will be adequate. Mr. Tomten accepted the amendment to the motion; amendment passed unanimously. Mr. Johnson assumed the chairmanship as Mr. Lieberman was not feeling well. Mr. Tomten moved to eliminate the lattice (privacy fence) using planter material with the existing fence line; approval to enclose the storage area under the stair with a lattice material similar to the existing construction; and approval of the proposed pergola. Mr. Brach seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-15 Design review of signage at 14328 60th St. N. in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Don Hoff, applicant. It was noted the applicant is Sign Art, rather than Signminds as listed in the agenda packet; the agenda packet material also included an address error, should be 14328 60th St. N. Mr. Johnson noted this request is similar to what has been previously approved for the River Heights Auto Mall. Mr. Tomten, seconded by Mr. Krakowski, moved approval as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-16 Design review of exterior modifications and signage at 102 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Tonya Fricke, applicant. The applicant was present; she noted the new signage would be placed over the existing signs. Mr. Johnson suggested introducing a border of some kind to delineate the sign a bit more. Mr. Tomten suggested the signage lettering is a bit too fine and will be a hard to read; he suggested using a bolder lettering. It was noted the landlord had already painted the exterior of the building the antique white color listed in the application. Mr. Brach moved to approve the request with the suggestions noted. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-17 Design review of signage at 402 Main St. N. in the CBD, Central Business District. Thomas Ward, applicant. The applicant was present. Mr. Johnson noted there is one door, with two business tenants; he also noted the dimensions provided are correct and within the requirements of the zoning code. Mr. Tomten noted there is no lighting indicated at this time. Mr. Tomten moved to approve as submitted. Mr. Goodman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-18 Design review of exterior modifications at 226 Chestnut St. E. in the CBD, Central Business District. Brian Larson, Larson Brenner Architects, representing Greg Gartner, applicant. The applicant was present, along with a project manager from Gartner Properties. Mr. Larson provided historic photos showing the building. Mr. Larson described the project — new storefront with 90-degree corner; widening the entrance so it will be accessible; aluminum window system 3 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 clad with wood or a wood -like product; a panel system at the location of the former sign covering deteriorated brick; a black awning with valence covering the panel system. On a question by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Larson said there are no plans to do anything to the second floor windows at this time other than some minor repairs during painting. Mr. Tomten moved to approve as submitted, with the conditions listed in the staff report and with the suggestion to lower the valence of the awning to achieve a 1:1 pitch. Mr. Pogge noted that one of the conditions in the staff report (condition 3) is the requirement for a wood door; Mr. Larson said that would be agreeable to the applicant. Mr. Tomten expanded his motion to include condition 3, utilizing a wood door and encasing any aluminum frame of the storefront windows with a wood finish on the exterior; and approving a signage plan of white letters on the valence of the black awning. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-19 Design review of exterior modifications for a restaurant at 229 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Rick Schmidt, applicant. The applicant and Mike Hoefler, architect, were present. Mr. Hoefler reviewed the proposal to put a 3,300-square-foot restaurant in the former Seasons Tique building, which is about 2,100- square feet. He said an addition of about 1,300 square feet will be utilized for kitchen and restroom uses. Also, he said plans call for an outdoor patio with wood -burning fireplace and pizza oven; plans also include an enclosed trash building that encases the required second egress from the rooftop deck. He said the storefronts would be identical to those on Mr. Zahren's building; he said nothing would be done with the existing brick other than tuck pointing and cleaning. He explained that three large openings with operable storefronts are proposed along the south elevation currently a concrete facade. He said wrought iron railings, matching the Water Street boardwalk railings, would be installed along the edge of the patio; the fireplace and enclosing piers along the boardwalk will be brick to match the storefront. Mr. Hoefler also described the proposed penthouse/deck area, which he said will be an indoor/outdoor space with some additional seating on the rooftop. On a question by Ms. Cook, Mr. Hoefler said they are planning to maintain a 6' public path through the existing walkway/open space to encourage traffic through the area. In discussion, Mr. Brach said he thought the two brick piers have a modern appearance in contrast with the rest of the building. Mr. Pogge provided some old photos and said it would be nice if the applicants were able to expose and restore the feature of the original columns. Mr. Hoefler said it might be possible to encase the existing pier with a raised panel or wood facade. Mr. Hoefler reviewed elements of the front elevation. Mr. Tomten inquired about the reason for the use of the brick piers; Mr. Hoefler said he did that to bring the brick element back down to the base to match the face brick; he said they would be OK with simply returning the steel wrought iron fence along that edge. Ms. Cook said she had difficulty envisioning the amount of activity/build-out proposed for this particular space; she said she would also feel badly about losing the existing open space/walkway. Ms. Cook also questioned the amount of use the patio space would be utilized given Minnesota's winters. Mr. Johnson said he thought this was a good use of the space, noting that public access will still be available and a two-story infill building could have been constructed on this site. Mr. Johnson said he would encourage than an effort be made to incorporate the original features of the columns integrated into the storefront, rather than utilize the piers with a brick that is inappropriate to the building. Mr. Lieberman inquired about rooftop mechanicals; Mr. Hoefler said mechanicals would be hidden by the roof parapet. Mr. Tomten agreed that this would be a good use of the space; he suggested perhaps picking up some of the original detailing on the windows at the rear elevation. Ms. Cook asked if it 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 would be possible to save the existing tree(s); it was suggested that the applicant could utilize some potted plants. Mr. Tomten moved approval with the 15 conditions listed in the staff report, with the additional condition to incorporate sills and headers on the rear entry fenestrations and to clarify that stone caps on the masonry piers in the exterior patio area are to be utilized, and to ask the applicant to look into the two columns in question and determine whether the existing structure can be maintained/renovated and incorporated into the historic storefront or at a minimum peel off any newer masonry. Mr. Tomten asked about colors for the storefront; Mr. Hoefler said everything will be black with the exception of the door, which will be stained and varnished oak. Mr. Brach seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-20 Design review of signage at 103 Main St. N. in the CBD, Central Business District. Mike Hornug, Rose City Canopy and Sign, applicant. The applicant was present. Mr. Pogge reviewed the proposal and staff recommendations. Mr. Johnson said when signage for this business was reviewed previously, the Commission allowed either signing on the canopy or signing on the building; this request is for signage on the canopy as well as the store itself. Mr. Pogge said when business park signage was amended about a year and a half ago to allow two signs, a section was added regarding gas stations, at any location in the City; he also noted that the previous business had signage both on the building and canopy so this request would have a grandfathered right. Mr. Tomten asked whether the applicant would consider using the existing black canopy and adding the company accent colors/logo. The applicant said the corporate entity is very sensitive to trying to cooperate to get something done, but a black canopy has never been utilized before, which is why he went with the white. Mr. Johnson noted this site has a very limited viewshed and said he thought the canopy and monument sign give a lot of exposure; he said he thought the use of the black canopy downplays a bit of the massing of the canopy, while white would make it more obvious. Mr. Johnson also pointed out that the proposed blue is a very foreign color to the historic district. Mr. Tomten pointed out there is no competitor located nearby so brand recognition is not as important as it might be in another location. The applicant responded that brand recognition does have a connection with credit card use, etc. that helps drive the business; he spoke of attempting to bring this location up to a new look that has some polish to it without compromising the looks the City is trying to preserve. Ms. Cook asked about the intention for the use of the existing pylon; it was explained the pylon will have the metal Lucky sign, black and orange. Mr. Lieberman said he would not be offended by the introduction of a new color at this site. Regarding the building signage, Mr. Johnson noted the proposal is to stay with the black signage band and staff's recommendation is to have one Lucky station and logo on the east side and another on the west side; the applicant said that would be acceptable. Regarding lighting under the canopy and the perimeter of the building, the applicant said he would be willing to change the soffit lighting around the perimeter of the building to soften the look. Mr. Johnson spoke of the conditions regarding no storage outside storage or sale of products. Mr. Tomten moved to approve as conditioned in the staff report, with the canopy signage as indicated on option 2A with the vintage logo and blue fascia color, and to incorporate either incandescent or florescent down lighting in lieu of the strip fluorescent lighting under the soffit of the building Mr. Tomten clarified that the signage for the pylon sign is to be approved at a later date. The applicant asked if there would be any opposition to LED down lighting on the outside 5 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 7, 2010 of the building; Mr. Tomten changed his motion to substitute LED down lighting for the building soffit. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/2010-21 Design review of signage at 1750 Greeley St. S. in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Mike Hornug, Rose City Canopy and Sign, applicant. Mr. Johnson reviewed the proposal; he noted there is no proposed change to the sign area of the pylon or height, with just one sign on the building. The applicant noted they would be going to more energy -efficient lighting under the canopies and on the building using the same fixtures. Mr. Tomten asked if there is any possibility of shielding the canopy fixtures; Mr. Johnson suggested the possibility of changing the lenses to a flush Tens rather than the existing drop boxes. The applicant explained that there are 2x2 boxes so there are already holes and a flush mounted lens is smaller than the existing openings. The applicant stated currently 320 watt bulbs are utilized; they will be going to a 150 watt induction light, so the lighting does not spread as far — it is much more directional. The applicant explained the plans for the existing car wash building. On a question by Mr. Tomten, the applicant said they would like to utilize the light bar encircling the canopy, which is part of the corporate new image. Mr. Krakowski moved to approve as conditioned; Mr. Brach seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Pogge noted he provided an assignment sheet for work to be done prior to the June 30 retreat. He asked that the materials be returned to him on the Wednesday before the retreat. Mr. Brach, seconded by Mr. Krakowski, moved to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 6 Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner /01 Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Re: Case 2010-11 Demolition request for a portion of the residence located at 1117 Broadway St N Message: The applicant has asked that the Commission continue their item to the August 2nd HPC meeting to allow them more time to address the Commission's comments from the June 7, 2010 HPC meeting. The decision deadline for this item is August 25, 2010. Staff Recommendation Table the public hearing to the August 2, 2010 meeting. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us ti �ater THE BIRTHPLACE OF M NNFSOTA Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: Junc01 APPLICANT: Mary Coleman CASE NO.: 10-12 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Ultima Bellezza Salon LOCATION: 105 3rd St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: HPC DATE: REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner,U NOT CBD - Central Business District June Y,20 ta es, DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of window signage at 105 3rd St S for Ultima Bellezza Salon. The proposed signage will cover more than one-third of the total window area. Section 31-509 Subd 4. (j) states: Subd 4. Permitted Signs (j) No sign permit is required for window signage that does not cover more than one-third of the total area of the window in which the sign is displayed." There is no specific prohibition on covering more than one-third of the total area with signage other than the requirement that one receive a sign permit to do so. Section 31- 209 (c)(2)xi. requires the HPC to review all signs in the Downtown Commercial Historic District. In moving to the window signage, the applicant proposes to remove her exiting exterior wood sign. In one window, the applicant is proposing a new neon identification sign with a light -up neon open sign below the identification sign. In three other windows, the applicant is proposing vinyl digital prints that will cover approximately two-thirds 105 3rd St S Page 2 of the windows with photos of various hair care options and descriptive words above the photos. The attached drawing details the proposed signs. RECOMMENDATION Consider/review the request and take an action. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage without approval of the Heritage Preservation Commission. o the request .is Tuly 11, 210; however; if necessary; staff Tie for an ad ztional6a° a s`as allowed by state state 1cs attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: )A de/D -'0047- Date Filed: S /a" de le Receipt No.:jS03 Fee: $25.00 ✓ 513/ The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required, Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project $D 11(d St S Assessor's Parcel No. 76131;0-C?(Foo ?,6 (Required) Zoning District 6'9 Description of Project in detail W 4c s�v�CLAekd td0 AAA 0 `t&& 11Q44A, v' -o e �p►�-1,,� "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner 601, ►�` Mailing Address / S City State Zip S t i c c L-cAy, Telephone No. Cr \ -2 c s Signature ( e�Gired) H:\mcnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 13, 2005 Representative aa,i (i ttncu\ Mailing Address i 5 114 5 5 City State Zip Si'1' 11 W yy vi Telephone No. (4 S 1 �I `��� 01''2_ Signature L VA/ ( (Required) City of Stillwater Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Turnblad, Please consider the enclosed request for approval pertaining to my window signage. I have included photos of the window for your reference. The proposed design and installation are not permanent and allow for removal in the future. Because my salon is set back from Third Street and is often blocked by parked cars, visibility to customers is a challenge; not only is it hard for customers trying to find Ultima Bellezza for the first time, but my opportunity to gain customers "off the street" is also limited. My business's success is dependant on getting customers through my door — and signage is a key component. Please feel free to visit my location to assess the challenges I face in identifying my business from the street. The proposed design will allow my business better visibility and help ensure that I'm able to keep my business in the Stillwater area. Thank you for your consideration, Mary Coleman Ultima Bellezza Salon 150 Third St S Stillwater Mn 55125 FILE NAME: ULTIMABELLEZZASALON-1 NOTES- 4'6" X 3' (ULTIMA BELLEZZA SALON) 8" X 2' (OPEN) NEON WINDOW SIGN 36" X 36" VINYL DIGITAL PRINTS SALESMAN: BRUCE KIFFMEYER LOCATION: STILLWATER, MN SCALE: 1 /4"=1' DATE: 04/06/10 BOX 881 Si, CLOUD MO 56302 (320) 252-9400 • Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: June 30, 2010 CASE NO.: 2010-21a APPLICANT: Raymond Queener, Assistant Supt. of Business & Administration Stillwater Public School District REQUEST: Design Review of proposed exterior building and site changes LOCATION: 1850 Greeley St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Industrial ZONING: BP -I - Business Park Industrial HPC DATE: July 7, 2010 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City PlannerM DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to make exterior building and site changes to the old UFE building at 1850 Greeley St S for Stillwater Area Public School's Early Childhood Family Center. The building changes involve adding a new canopy along most of the south elevation and a portion of the north elevation; adding several new windows that will match existing windows; filling in two existing truck docks along the west (rear) elevation with concrete blocks that match the adjacent surfaces; and adding several wall mounted lighting units. The site changes include improving the parking areas and adding a drive connection to Industrial Blvd. 1750 Greeley St S Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST The property is located within the West Stillwater Business Park. Consequently, the design standards found in the West Stillwater Business Park Plan apply to the project. A. West Business Park Plan Architectural Standards a. The overall form and style of the building will remain the same. The new materials being introduced meets the intent of the architectural standards of the West Business Park Plan. The applicant will present material and color samples to the Commission at your July 7th meeting. B. Miscellaneous a. Lighting - An exterior lighting plan for the addition has been submitted. The lighting plan shows a number of new wall lights being added to the buildings on the site along with the exiting wall lights and pole lights. b. Signage- The applicant has indicated that signage would be addressed later by the district once the site near completion. RECOMMENDATION Review the proposal and take an action. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No signage shall be installed without approval of the Heritage Preservation Commission. attachments: Applicant's Form and Associated Material 1 I von qoac FOUND I/7 RON PPE MARKED ANEZ a- AT PARCEL CORNER 904, SAMTARY SERVICE WATER seance X A/PII SANITARY 'SERVICE A 900" WATER %owe \ er ....O rW --- .. ..\\.\ 6A'• ,.;,.y'',,k'\4,',\','‘'7,.-'4"''.-,.t,.1„,a\i'L;.,.,.,l:N :' z-'.N74iWl- 6-I'I/ ° ';'-•'';,,:,1H . ,--:':-;-A_,tc:4.-ir, ai/rl- "1-•i ,I,'z,,-7i=',,'.-.Va' t ,si/ '6/y.:1-1;2-i' I./_Ry,, 6,.•1,-,-11.7ri1„ ,. ' -y)sH-% .'•/ '>./,'-"-,/, ' / ,• ,-I,- .-_•' /0I 1'1II :tf , 1 i1 4il It, eto - - - I -r" -aA .,:_-/,,..7.:77_.16\, ,g\ tv \ , 9 T:1 _12"C -9-'- -i. 77.=S'I-. P2M" ecossDSPOSAL \ '- ) -7-PARCEL; <NakR-NOACM 4 \ 7 40.-- -,.: 1 '. - .-----4---,°0/ r-(WU ,, ,,A. - P (j°P'', EAsereot PER \,_'-\-L..- ' qoaI..ol l ' , X A081 It A033 CO. arwoole r-mr-vo3.3 . FOUND I/2' RON i : PPE MARLED ANEZ STORM WATER .--wr-FoorEt-coomo --,..--98_0741L -- EASEMENT PER , DOC. NO. 404202 - - --41';';,-7- & 436263 PA6.3 EXISTING BUILDING / N884708"W 303.05 4073 ISTLEINOIM » _ X AMP • -I -Li -I _>> ..1) 3612C0 298.43 4,7JC," • ------ • :gis 5040 an-qoe.e 50.40100.0 004o407.4 No/ N4.402.5 00 The following legal description per ISA Title Services, LLC, as agent for First American Title Insurance Company Titk Commitment No. 100107, dated March 4th, 2010. Parcel 1: The North One NuniguMwenty-Two (122) feet of the South Three HurrilrEffliNirity-Two (322) feet of the Northwest Quartir of the Southwest Quarter of Section Thirty-three (33), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West, lying West of the centerline of County Highway No. 66. Torrens Property - Certificate of Thie No. 65165. Parcel 2: The South Two Hundred (200) feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NW1 /4 of SW1/4) of Section Thirty-three (33), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Twenty (20) West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying West of the centerline of County Highway No. 66. Abstract Property. Parcel 3: All that part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33 in Township 30 North of Range 20 West, described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 33 thence East along the North line of sald Southwest I /4 of the Southwest 1/4 for 486.3 feet to the centerline of County Road No. 66: thence south 3 degrees 50 minutes East along said centerline of County Road No. 66 for 200.5 feet: thence West and parallel with said North line of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 for 501.6 feet to the West line of said Section 33; thence North along said West line of Section 33 for 200 feet to the point of beginning. Abstract Property. Parcel 4: Lot Three (3), Block Four (4), Feeley's Adition, Washington County, Minnesota, Abstr-act Property. Parcel 5: Lot Four (4), Block Four (4), Feeley's Addition, Washington County, Minnesota., Abstract Property. rl. \ LOT LOT 4 9 Lit NOT LOCATED I S', i ii 18 s. la t ..: STORNAIMYER .E.NLy ---"y.., L. EAsereNT PE4 I MANAGE ' . DOC. NO. 3710856...,.. -1 X AMP JONI DRIVEWAY 1 EASEfENT PER 1 „ ‘,„,,., DOC. NO. 3561792 - - .1------=.-----1 -...,-& 3565420 A I '- '''-*7 ST , - -1 --,-"- - . C.& BITUtINOuS ' 9 1 STORM SEWER 10 '-'es. kiV-403.4 FOUR) 1/2' --- PON PPE EXISTING BUILDING moo° ANEZ AT THE NW CORNER OF TYE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 To: Stillwater Area Public Schools, Johnson Kellogg Properties, LLC, ESA Iltle Services, LLC,Iirs agent for First American Title insurance Company: This Is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in Ig accordance with 'Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Tide - Surveys," jointly established and adopted by ALTA, ACSM and NSPS in 2005, and indudes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11 a, 14, 16, 17 and 18 of Table A thereof. Pursuant to the Accuracy Standards as adopted by ALTA and NSPS and in effect on the date of this 1§41 certification, undersigned further certifies that In my professional opinlon, as a Land Surveyor registered In the State of Minnesota that the Positional Uncertainties resulting froth the survey measurements made on the survey do not exceed the allowable Positional la• Tolerance. CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. Dated: 4-23-10 By • Daniel L Thu es Minnesota License No. 25718 SCHEDULE B NOTES: Survey related Items as shown on Schedule 8 of FSA Tide Services, LLC, as agent for First American Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. 100107, dated March 4th, 2010. 9. Final Certificate per Book 261 of Deeds, Page 373 as Document No. 231472 (as to Parcel 3). (DOES NOT EFFECT PROPERTY - R/W FOR S.T.H. NO. 36) 10, Final Certifcate per Book 286 of Deeds, Page 433 as Document No. 250358 (as to Parcel 3). (DOES NOT EFFECT PROPERTY - R/W FOR S.T.H. NO. 36) 11. Right of Way for County Road 66 a/k/a South Greeley Street as shown on available maps (as to Parcels 1, 2 and 3). 12. Drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat of Feeley's Addition (as to Parcels 4 and 5). 13. Wetlands located on the northwest portion of Lot 3, Block 4 Feeley's Addition as shown on the plat of Feeley's Addition and available maps. 14. Easement and Temporary Easement per Document No. 404201 as amended by Document No. 436264 (as to Parcel 4) 15. Easement and Temporary Easement per Document No. 404203 as amended by Document No. 436262 (as to Parcels 4 and 5) 16. Easement and Temporary Easement per Document No. 404202 amended by Document No. 436263 (as to Parcel 5) (7. Joint Driveway Easement per Document No. 3561792 (as to Parcel 5) 18. Joint Driveway Easement per Documem No. 3565420 (as to Parcel 5) 19. Storm Water Drainage Easement per Document No. 3710856 (as to Parcels I, 2, 4 and 5). 104 105 FOUND I/2" RON PPE AT PARCEL CORIRR - - SURVEY NOTES: \ 90 I \ W'N OP TPIP SO)TH327.00 FEET TYE X AMP I NW 1/4 0E-T405-516-1,0 Of SEC. 31 030. 020906FOuND I/2" RCN I I \ AT PARMIET DITCYT;.;;; ' 482-.57 450054 3T 3 X 0007 9030 0010 ,---- er° SOJTH 16 Of THENW./1.:: Of THE SW V9 Of 5E6/33. 130. 020 103.3 i IPp.A.RaCELL 32 03)1 L.--.NORTH LNE OE THE SW 1/4 OF THE 0.. ..., 0SW I/OOf 000. 33, T30, 020 ° -,-°-° r.f L - -it AN.4 A _4. I. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED. 2. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, ELECTRIC, ETC NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE FIELD LOCATE PER VISIBLE STRUCTURES WHERE POSSIBLE MOST U11LMES ARE SHOWN PER AS-BUILTS INFORMATION - CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE BEFORE EXCAVATING. ,--FLOOR ELEV. FtooR ELEV. .917.8 o, I I I I ! [ 1/ 943---49285 MEA 049019.06.. 486.30 DESC. EXISTING BUILDING FLOOD INFORMATION: EXISTING BUILDING 1792 S. GREELEY ST. SUILANC FOOTPRINT AS SHOWN 8.041 SOFT. FLOOR ELEV. INJEDNG 0506.6 ,----NORTH LIR OF 114E SOUTH 200. PEEP 1.14 / NW V4 OF TYE 6W 1/4 OF SEC. 33. T30, R20 je at' EXISTING BUILDING 1. 18SO S. GREELEY ST. BULDNG FOOTPRNT AS SHOWN 28,284 SOFT. BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY. THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE 'C' OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL 140. 2702490005 C DATED 2-1-1984 AREA TOTAL AREA OF PARCELS - 328,822 SQ.FT. / 7.55 ACRES AREA OF PARCEL 1 - 59,021 SQ.FT. / 1.35ACRES AREA OF PARCEL 2 = 97,845 / 2.25 ACRES AREA OF PARCEL 3 = 99,393 SQ.FT. / 2.28 ACRES AREA OF PARCEL 4 = 36,421 SQ.FT. / 0.84 ACRES AREA OF PARCEL 4 = 36,142 SQ.FT. / 0.83 ACRES 0-4.000 „ 0100 .947.8 EXISTING BUILDING 1562 S. GREELEY ST. OULliNG FOOTPRINT AS SHOWN 14.030 SOFT. FLOOR 6100. .912.2 HEIGHT . BUILDING SETBACK & ZONING INFO ZONING: BUSINESS PARK INDUSTRIAL FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 40 FEET REAR BUILDING SETBACK = 30 FEET SIDE BUILDING SETBACK -20 FEET MAX BUILDING HEIGHT = 40 FEET MAX IMPERIOUS AREAS - 60% PARKING TOTAL NUMBER OF VISIBLE MARKED PARKING STALLS LOCATED ON ALL PARCELS = 144 INCLUDING I HANDICAP STALL IT APPEARS THAT SOME STALL MARKINGS HAVE FADED. r ca. '67.0 U .467 SYMBOLS: T CB. NV. an-qt3.4 CH. 001. Nv. MANHOLE CULVERT GAS METER FENCE CONCRETE DENOTES FOUND 1/2' IRON PIPE DENOTES SET 1/2" IRON -6-- PIPE MARKED RIS 25718 TO BE SET CATCH BASIN HYDRANT SIGN WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE UGNT POLE TELE/ELEC BOX GAS VALVE OVERHEAD WIRES WELL CONTACT: STILLWATER AREA SCHOOLS TONY WILLGER 1875 SOUTH GREELEY STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 CITY - COUNTY: I 'I-"rWASHINGTON, COUNTY REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 4-23-10 FIRST ISSUE 5-1-10 ADD ELEVATIONS 6-17-10 ADD TREES NORTH 30 60 PROJECT LOCATION: 11 CI SOUTH GREELEY STREET - 3303020330014 3303020320014 330302032001 3 320302041 0022 320302041 0023 Suite #13100 200 East Chestnut Street Mester, MN 55082 Phone 851.275.8989 Fax 651.275.8978 dan@cesurvey .net CORNERSTONE LANE SURVEYING. INC FILE NAME PROJECT NO. SURVULOI A LIL08001 A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SAN AI RIM=909.b INV=896.7 EXISTING BUILDING to to to Do 3o ba to t0 1.o to b• to to to to to to to .• no no to t0 b.o 0• to ba to to to D• to t, to 0.o to D Do Da t.o no to D to to to to D.o b D.o no t0 to D.o t 0.o D.. to D.o to t. to t: to t.0 n. t to 1., D.. to to 0.n D: to Do t. Do to to to to to to t. to to to D to to. t0 to 0.o D. t.0 D. b.0 to 1. to to to D. b.• D. t.. to b to to 10 b b Do TRAILER PA J INGI \ b, DB.EASEM II-T =907.3 \ f RIM INV.907 GRAVEL l \ 1 kriii_, /r// ////////isGr:G rAillW .'rliaii4.11 A►Ji// eMer J W RIM 908 8 ■.', i1� •. WJ� I'N.900.0 EE 'ay V=902.a NW INV=902.5 SW SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1+xra EXISTING BUILDING 3 no to D. o Do 0., to 01.7 to b. D to D. ea D• b. b. E=899.5 to t, t.o to Do t D.o D.o 904.7 n.o to to to b.o to bD., n, to b.. to to 1.3 L3 to roa D, D.2 ea 12 Da b, bo e., to bs to t. to b. to to t. b: to to t: ba D, to 5 ,RM' EW o D., n2 W 0.2 to t: 1., b, t., t., t, , t, t, to o to .0 to to no m to to to Do too t.o .. to to to t.o b.. ba to boo b.o to t.0b to to b.o to to n3 1, 12 12 1, t., to to no 1.o to to D. t. 1.o t.0 10 to D.o 1., roa to t, 1, 1a 1. 1 0, Si 1.. to a.z 1 11 1s 1.3 1- t. to 12 1.2 , , to to to to to to b.e to� D.o to to to no to to to to to b.o to to Da 1a to 0., 1., to t., to t, 153 Da t, to to to to 1, 1., 1, t, e, t. b: b, t: D: to to to too t.> 1> 12 17 to to 1, is IA 0 1, EXISTING to 1: U is to 1. 1. 5, 0.. 1. to to S fa 1.> 1. 1.2 10 1, 0, A: WOOD FEN( 'AL' 1.. 1.0 1.2 1.2 EXISTING BUILDING 1792 S. GREELEY ST. BUILDING FOOTPRINT AS SHOWN 8.041 MET. o b.o to no .o N :906.2 0: b.2 Da : Ds D Da F .. to to b..®: a .. 1: bog to 1: 12 , •. b: . ba na to to to to D, to to to to M��1lfi 1110 d e T, 1a as 1. r la7/.o t.. to •a to 1., ]v 1.Y0 EXISTING BUILDING 011 011 011 SE111ING .3 m , 1, D.2 to to Da Da t, 0., t, to t., t: 1, t: t 1e. 2 Da , n2 to EXISTING BUILDING 1850 S. GREELEY ST. BUILDING FOOTPRINT AS SHOWN 28.284 SO.FT. b.o b.o to no t.o no to to LIGHT b.s to b: JLIGI9i 0., Do t, t, t, to b- n-%, t, -S b.T'Do 0 to to to to to 0.o to to Do t.o to 0, too to to 1., t, D, 1, t, to to t, 0.o to 1,. to Too t.. t.0 EXISTING B-12'UILDING 1862 S. GREELEY ST. 8-12'UILDINC FOOTPRINT A5 SHOWN 14.030 SOFT. o bp boo bo no bo no II3: to to too bn PWaEe.toGN10 ba RIN no no n. no MW= to to to Da to to to 1.a to to to to to to .0 to to t 6 Da Do . o to to to b.0 to to D, D2 b., to 1.0 ?Alit. b. b b. t ba t: b, Do to to to to to to to 0 to t0 to b.. to to 00D FENCE t., 1., to to to to 10 b. END STo-< SEWER PIPE to to . • to Do to D• t0 a •: t to D. no Do to 0.o to Da no Do t• Da b to t.- Da to to no to ba bo to to Do ba o n. to to bo 0. D. M=917.0 1tr91 7 1M=909.7 IM=913.4 0 0 Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR LWeon Commons 380 SG Pet. Scat, Suite 600 Solna Paul, MN 55102 651.222.3701 =W wX,r.wpWavnauopa..2W Nome lamed For Tm Dae R.?,ad Copy r. Too beree..W W Vlore en.FW 9a&a.l D W198eb.ppt'leFri9h.8M.Y. Dem IMRT/10 Dams AWN. Comm. D]Om05100 Geded GI,.Uar SITE LIGHTING PLAN ShmNn SLI Copyright BWBR Architects 2 -10 FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES 000000000000000000 raretIMBovmro1L6MV km®aueu1R.M FLOOR PLAN SYMBOLS LEGEND wu HOD m ranE.w.r VER MaEura ad wwR13M0 m R3WI TAG wawa NI WE001 ra Ire m 111.01 Calla Mf BRIMS CO smarm 0.00E a�--�—uauar Mild M111113CF NMOE0114 MOM MOWN. Mat 614101. rar 1.nluxwxam 110,16,11.6 MVO. REPM111gN ,,P111SYMOI. MICEIM1wrNMI RE Man% u C. F rorxl>,1+wru.mracusnwIicxnw" LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN c B Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Gammons 380 Se Petri Snook Suite 600 Seine Not 1 55102 651.2223701 Araaa•hrry, oo0r�nl+�rs�a4 1.m.rrrarswu:rW4W Nm Gm Due MEMIMastatme non ma RMS. 1 Dm1E 9wlte non.8. 88.8... Mnala OWd LOWER LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN 400.FL CoPPrigh<BWBR Mohasco, e 8 children 8 children 8 children Therapy Suite ' 270 sf RRST LEVEL • FLOOR PLAN 16 children 12 children 12 children 16 children 12 children I herapy Suite 1050 sf 16 children 16 children 16 children Office Suite 700 sf ► liiiiii r, 1M. ra• FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES 000000000000000000 NOM,NOT ,II NRm NO1F8wYREOMDON MA FLOOR RAN SYMBOLS LEGEND EALR 011.111486 WWI EM.ES m RAM AMMO YOMI IllEfEratf EM9M00011 ® rowx EMEOOR .FERN REREMCE iM IOU ME MR MNMN. BMW BEM1011 MFME=YM COAMONaE NOEOOR BEAD. REiMd4 IMMO MUNK GM/ ROOYNME ® ONDMRHM F1M OEIM MFM.= ROM IMAM MMMOX PEFIERHICE 174 AMMO. CM TIE MAL "SWAINS NLMNBMMWMCED MAMA HIES Alf ME= 4 p 0 BYLMR 1rvFOEIMAWMiE IIE 3 EMOtNN *AMMO ME (--RN IYM DIE. Nor. NAY Mu5M M4EYNMA4 Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 S6 Peal S1tee, Suite 600 Slim Paul, DIN 55102 651.222.3701 Condom �W�hewMsnannononn Ws, =eNer`nJr1. 0 Maµu, d Name Waal Pot bece lll_ Rh Men maosne YMMM k 1.1coM neROSW SIN DmYq Bms i0!' M RI SNe Slwb. Due osnmo FIRST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN 401.FL Copyright BWBR Ambiteca SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN KEYED NOTES 000000000000000000 FLOOR PLAN SYMBOLS LEGEND DM O&M +WO 0 mama VIM 10 10100 wOR I11190O1 MONO UGHT 000301100 /01010 Rq. ..010401110 iEDODDNE AMAN G0DEm00. MEW .W MOM. CEY N000l0t 1H11EPn0N N FMEOET?LN.880N 110 tt EOM IMEReR.EroG 80 ON 8661BIRLY. mason 0OOM REFFAIN..0 1001101 001111011 MEM. DO OEDA RS.@LE V4 80100701E MINN REM. F P..M. MINN umarLElurMINE NONM NMI/ UMW MIN' nwv a x Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commas 380 St Peas %hat Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 6511223701 c®Rteete map mama AM.Aem•Memmem../ M00 terse.ate.ratAamaA Name le. Date MEMtor. Taber MNla 1'10q0114 NEb 0001.0 Eu bMPlyM M Y$1ML Date Dew Oe117/10 Gwen He. 0E70039300 SECOND LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN 402.FL Copyright EWER Architects • New Canopy New Windows To Match Existing Existing Brick To Remain • • Existing Block To Remain New Canopy Beyond •Existing Brick To Remain Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 651.222-3701 D,,. Issue Date n,ued so. r m. m,waK s r roiq Da a Emi saa sraa' D�a.,�y ��svaro Ew sae soon: Mw 06,17/10 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTE: Elevations are NOT to scale. (:opyright BWBR AahiMAS •New Canopy Below •Existing Block To Remain 7-`7•New Windows To Match ExIsting 0- 7 Q New Canopy• New Block Wall In -Fill To Match Existing • 0 0 •Existing Brick To Remain --•New Windows To Match Existing. — Block To Remain. New Storefront Entry New Windows To Match Existing• Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Raul, MN 55102 651.222.3701 Date Issue Cade Hog. No. iCtA - co_ _ o Date 06/17/10 Drawn A01101 2C00053.00 Gecko., °woke, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOTE: Elevations are NOT to scale. Copyright BWBR Architects •III Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Stan, Site 600 Stint Pad, MN 55102 651.2223701 Consultants Name m.sn.nm7— a.a�K.a coax. iior�oa.rans�:asrox ��re s�o+b%sooh io Fmi sm sre.a Date 00/17/10 Comm. No. Cnecked SITE • Copynght BWBR Aahnects REMOVE I STORM SEWER 8-Ida A RCP AND FES 7 I \y' • SYMBOL LEGEND REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION REMOVE ANO DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTON DEMOLITION NOTES 0 SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURB *NO GUTTER. 9 NORTH 0 15 30 66 Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 Sc Peter Sneer, Suite 600 Saint Paul, NEN 55102 651.222.3701 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore ROW While Beer Lake, MN 55110 851 481.9120 (f) 851.481.9201 www.larsone geun ..m- ...em.F—..., Inn MUe] A. Murphy, PF., LEEO AP Ds. 06.17.10 Rey. No. .08 Inued For MINMir Sheet may bee Red<e.eq. TM Ow abr. is 1• Ins on a Full SMe Moot Deming S0M e8Ny b Full Sae Shea. Doe SMmlo bralm AMM C oi. C1cl:d 330000 .00 CAeeb She[T'ule DEMOLITION PLAN Shan No. Cl Copyright BWBR:lrciurccts 3 r. Ary,AA .��♦ ®- _slSTirtG "ii — -r°a- - — I SHEL" DRI\ SYMBOL LEGEND NEW 8' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OVER NEW r CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE NEW 3' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OVER NEW IM CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE NEW 4' POROUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OVER r INGOT 3137 CA.50 AGGREGATE OVER GM COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE. NEW M CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER NEW 6' CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE WHERE APPLICABLE. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK 6 CURB OR BACK OF CURB TO END OF STALL LINE 41ii) NORTH Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St. Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 651.2223701 Cumulate i Larson G Engineering, Inc. 3524 Lahore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 651 481.9120 (1) 551.461.9201 Vnvwlarsonengr.00m Memel0, weeny. P.E., LEEOAP Date 08.17.10 Eq;, No. 43808 Memel Fnt lien Due -04 NMI1Sie mat Reduced Coq aea The Su.* a 1' Iona on a *8 Sire SMel DmwN scam moh m wl s:n BMeHs Drum Nn flaked 3.30080..M. CSmJa Meet./irk PAVING AND DIMENSION PLAN Meet Mi. 0 15 30 6D C2 Copyright BIXBR Architects A 5 r, \ Itl.oft,.. "\t, \ ;;;;i7.;;I: CLASS II MPRAP AT CURB CUT OLFELET ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT (OPTIONAL) DIRECTION OF NATURAL SOIL / NOT 10 SCALE ENGINEERING FAB. FABRI ANCHORAGE TRENDH. BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOL NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION. ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RiNGS, STF-EL POSTS WITH WIRES. OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES. SILTATION FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 1 I flr' si 44 ‘s RUPP 411114 &ZS PI. 0 ,11006011 311E0 0.42 Fie 0 *0.6000 fl15D&F0U4t30001 ere.= .0,113MILM PATE m 36,U= 11.4.67465160e3a111. GeSTETEEKETT9613...04.1 PLAN CM 2., CPS LE MC 1 I • 1 Airdow PROFILE INFRASAFE INLET 2 PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQUAL) NOT TO SCALE 'j D'EST!,EC 1,42 S,REILE, SE iuttf. rerliiiial 905.30 C , KEELS. - - - - - Crcesswat%•'->g: g SUE -:g:. g. 0'0 • • E f I, 1 ! "••</, , .03,,„ 0 0,0 o ill ill f.771.747:7l-71- , - ir,11 • • • .E06:TC 22 GL • Dflf•SEiEft Eff.f,f.1:EfE0 1,362 G1E0t503,SE .• , • . -.1 .e2;romtp G.5 firs OiledgErt.Cle Age,. 0.0 eTT lierVeatile Crliteetage RATE 437e1100) etAMMart OvLSPLOW KATE re Si HEAP) EMOT rermiry (.411733 3.. CPS .00 GCS te BASKET ar3.1, feg,/..AlregGXE SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. Owner and Conbector 211951 obtain lauCeMPOES permit. Conlacior Moll be responsi. Er all fees pertaMng to Mis per.. SWPPP shaS M kept °nate al all Mcs. 1, 2. IMall temporary erosion cenlrol measures (iNet protection, silt Enna, and rock wean* 1 -.3 eneances) prior to beginning my e=avalion cc demolition MN al Ma ele. I E •8. Erosion conirol measures shown on theartision oar. plan are . =solute minimum. The contrallor shall inalaN temporary earle dikes, .Ment Mps cc basins, addiMnel allallon fencing, a.or disk the soil parallel to the contours as dem. necessary to further control erosion. AN Menges eh= be remded in the SWPPP. All mama. silo entrances shad be surfaced NM cm.. me across Me entire oidth of Ine anima= and from Ma wirer. lo • point 50. come.. eine. The toe of . silt fence Matt be Mnched in a minimum of Si. lbe Irench ba.511 MOM compacted Nth a Magary plate compact. 419 gmang operations Mal be conducted in a manner to min.= the polenlial for site erosion. Sediment control menaces mist be iralardishad on ell down gradient p.n.s before any up gradient Md disNMing =Mitres begin. All exposed soil arms must kahilixed as soon es possible to Snit soil erosion MI in no ea= later Man 14 days after Me consatiction actives in MN porton of the ale has temperer. or patrolmen...med. Temporary slockpiles without signifimee silt, day or organ, someone. (e.g., clean aggregate stoMass, demolition Med. slackplbs. Send stockpiles) and the constructed base componeots of roads. panting Ws and =neer surfaces are exempt 00,51,5 norrnel wetted perimeter of any Immo, or permanent dminege alch cc male 1.1 drains *from any porlion of the constnrclion site, or diverts =Me around the ate, must ba Mbrimd Marin 200 in. het from the presorts edge, or from the point of disMarge in. any surface water. Stabircalion of Me last 200 Meal reet must tre completed Mein 24 hoes NM ounneraM to a surface wahr. S.Ertalion of the rema031,9 porfions of any lemporary or pennon. ditches or svmles most be complete MOO 14 dem after connecting toe surf. water end co.rialem in itra pod. of the ditch Ma ternaccarily or permanently ceased. 9. Pipe eutlatsmust M provided energy deseialion 24 bows of connedlon lo surface water. 10. AP rip, shall be 110wied rem finer material or spa separation feeder. comply leen gie 86,05040 Depe.ent of immoral., Stand. SpecNcetions. 11. Al storm sewers discharging into welkin= or eater Md. shire oulle1a1 or below tha norma nate, level of the respective wetland entailer Sods et en elevation Mem Ore dovoslrearn .pe e 1 1 percent or Ile., The nonnal wafer level shalt M invert elevation of the outlet of ...land re water body. i" -1, 12. Al Norm "ewer =. Mains . need. for sile drainage during construclion Mall be raven. la prevent runoff from aelering Oa Moan saner system. Cane basins necessary for sile drainage win! d g construction shell be provided Nth in. amain. 13. Iriznrerert,e,... corment....nieted flosz=nchb:sbarmlesbird almllfront of storro,oatch.c.sins I i 000 facilities from the concentrated ems. • 1 14. Inspect the =mired. site on= mery seven days dudng active constru=on end Main 24 flows 1' ri alter a medal event greater Men 0.5 inches in 24 hours. An inspections shall be moot. in Me -1- 15. Al sill fences must be repaired. replaced, or supplemented when Mos become riontureaonsi or the aMmen1 mac. 1/3 of heighl of the fence. These repairs must be made ralnin 24 Ivare, of disoevery, or es soon as field conditions all. scams repairs Mall be recorded in the SWPPP. 16. If sediment escapes Me constraclion site. offoite accumulalions of serliMent must be removed in a Nen. end M e fmNency sta0en1 minimixe offelle impacts. 17. AU .s Mcked .o pavement shell Ire removed daily. 111. All infillmtion areas must be inspected Mena. OM no sediment from ongoing construction activity is remains . infiltralion area and Mese areas are prei.ted from comps.° due to constr.. equipment daring =ass the infilmlion area 19. Temporary sol stockpiles must have . fence or Neer effective sediment contnas, e. cannot be placed O sal. waters, including aerometer conveyances such as curb and guder =Nem, or condues end ditches unlass there is a bypass O place forMestommmtar. 20. Collected sediment. asphalt and comm. Menge, firsaiing deeds, =pm Nash. fal. construction and dernoNion debris end other mates must he dim... P.M/ and M. comply MO MPCA risposal requiem/NM. • I 21. OK gaeoline. min, and arry Ressedous substances most be MOMS amed induriing ealandery cardeinment m prevent Spills, leaks or ogler discharge. ResOcled am. lo storage areas m. M NOVided to prevent vandalism. Storage end 4s70.S 0lI,.,0,4705,*9es1050 51 compact. vithAMCA regulations. s • 22. Este701 washirry of trucks end Neer construction vehitles most Nmited lo a defined area of the sae. Runoff must M contehed end we. poperry dam= 0, No engine Mgmaing 9.161054 23. Al liquid and solid weeles generated lay con.. mshout operations must he contain. in larderverd containment facility or Mpermea. Men A compaclad day liner Pat does nel =ow 6 washout liquids to weer ground waiter Is considered en impermeable liner. The Mukl end said wastes musl conlaa Me ground, end there must not M nsnoff from IM washout operations or areas. Liquid and sofid mates must be deposed of properly and in compliance with MPG regulallons. A sign must Ire installed adjacent bee. matrout facility M inform conc.15 mlaCineel operators to all. Me proper facialles. 24. Upon complekim of the project and stabilaalion al all graded areas, all temporary etraMn control 25. permanent sediment.10, basins mat tie restored to Mee design condition imillerdialely ladle. (sill Wm., hay balers, ere) Shall be removed horn tha els. folloviing MbilizeSon M the site. 26. Contractor shell submit Notim of Termination for MPCAMPOES permit .MO30 Mys after Final GRADING NOTES I. Grades shom in paved areas represent finish 2. Restore all N.M. I. ere= reth 4. of good qually tops= a. seed. 424, 3. All canstrucliart shell be perforn. in ecconianco eah Mle a= lora! MndaM specifiraMns Aar REUSEABLE 400 MICRON INFRASAFE INLET FILTER BAG IN EACH BASKET PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQUAL) NOT TO SCALE SPOT ELEVATION LEGEND 3 11.1311143U0 CriCCNCRETE TC TCP OF CURB OL GETTER CURB re PELDVERIFY NORTH Stillwater .Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCUITECTS Lawson Commons 330 St Paw Street Suite 600 Saint Paul, AIN 55102 651.2223701 Cornultann Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Lahore Road Mete Bear Lake, IAN 55110 651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201 www.larsonengr.corn tOent,e0,1664 spoToaleermedirmay mos 0J, kern Polftwaimaten.werweldrila of to luxe I..esp• MMnel A Murphy, P.6, LEV, AP Due 0.'7.10 Kex. ein 42605 local Fte Item 111.11. This Meat may be Retal The Irer =me is long on • Full Sim Mem Moan° scam C6/17/10 Cnalla 32009033110 Orel. Checker Mast Tax GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheer Nn. 0 15 30 60 C3 Copyright B117B11 Aschnects PLANT NATIVE PLUGS =La la IIIII 197. HOPE, 12 LF Q 0.56% R1Me905.50 INV•900.15 BIORLTPATON BASIN 750 BF OF SURFACE AREA CONNECT NEW 1S HOPE INTO EXISTNG CATCH BASIN INVa908.8 1S HOPE, 51 LF at 1.00% 2X3 CB RIMa013.30 INV4109.11 BOTTOM = 905.00 S SOIL MIXTURE (25% LOAMY TOPSOIL 50% COARSE CLEAN SAND, 25% COMPOST) CLEAN SAND z"„I.I� rti_IYHIE '�L'Nl I� •�2.yl . �:� IH IIC7Jr 'a .C—IIHI�IG I F= I— u— I=111=11 ICI J=TPa I R PEA GRAVEL WOVEN SOIL SEPARATON FABRIC- 'MIRAFI 170N OR EOUAL' 4' PERFORATED PE PIPE (CONNECT TO CATCH BASIN) BIO RETENTION BASIN NOT TO SCALE 4S CB' RIM•903.50 11,001DU T� `^,SHELZDRIV NORTH Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC BWBR ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 St Pam Sneer, Suits 600 Saint Paul, A04 55102 651.2223701 f.,nsulwn Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labors Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 651.081.9120 (1) 651.481.9201 en4W.larsonengrosrs Da. my m. pat mammon, + a o lo. mad as M'baMA baud Pl anima eti�rvManma masts A Murphy. P.E., LEES AP Dane 00.17.10 u'Vn 42120.9 Date - This Sheenbe Baal Cap,. no Oa above B 1' long co a Full Size SMa. W aak9 Basin welt' lo F00 Sire Eleeea Da¢ OMtTNU (Amen. Nn 31008053.0E UTILITY PLAN 0 15 30 80 C4 Copyright BWBRArcbioocts i 8' STEEL STAKE NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT R THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 00,0 e .u,vcaTsA 'e4Pe ' neutun. get,' 18• POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 NIL. 1-1/2- WIDE STRAP TtP_) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA, WIRE — 3' 0 120" INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH TURNBUCKLE WM DOUBLE STRAND /16 GAUGE +DIRE — 3 PER TREE 6"-6• LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDw000 MULCH IN SAUCER —EXTEND PAST STAKE FINAL GRADE OF PUNT TO EOUAL ORIGINAL GRADE 2"x2'x30" STAKES SET 120" APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE — 3 PER TREE BACKFILL wan PLANTING SOIL AINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED SOIL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES DF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL LEGEND: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TREES TO REMAIN (PROTECT WITH .00 ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE) TREES TO BE REMOVED AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE -?MIN CALIPER NOTE: TREE SAVE AREAS SHALL BE ENCLOSED WITH ORANGE TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND SHALL BE SIGNED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 0!E-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE WARRANTY BEGINS ON THE DATE OF INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIALS SHALL ALSO HAVE A 01E-YEAR WARRANTYCOMMENCING UPON PLNATING. USE A MINIMUM OF 12- LOAM PLANTING SOIL ON TREES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY -PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE ONLY AFTER WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. TREES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRNAL TO THE SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS TEMPORARILY, IF NECESSARY. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 4• DEEP SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND ALL INSTALLED TREES. 410 NORTH Stillwater Area Public Schools ECFC B W B R ARCHITECTS Lawson Commons 380 5c Pear Street, Suite 600 Seine Pad, SIN 55102 651.2223701 G 5 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labors Road WNW Bear Lake, MN 55110 651.4,31,9120 (1) 651481.9201 www.larsonengr can We Nos axed ked,loomed Rok*Fniruws 81aMe1 A Murphy, PE, LEED AP Dave 08.17,10 Seg.. No. 62008 MEMTNe Sheet may boa Reduced CMy. The 8w� onF, 1• log e A Sue Sheaf ePa1 M RAI See SMNe Dx 08,17110 Doan ono.. Nn 3.2005050.00 Eacelud CheeHer Sheen Yale TREE PRESERVATION /REPLACEMENT PLAN Show No. 0 15 30 80 C5 Copyright BWBB .Architects evA L/THON/A L/ONTING® FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE —For building-andwall-mounted applications. CONSTRUCTION —Rugged, die-cast, single -piece aluminum housing. Die-cast door frame has a 1/8"thicktempered glass lens. Doorframe isfullygasketedwith one-piece solid silicone. FINISH —Standard finish istextureddark bronze (DDBT)corrosion-resistantpolyester powder finishAdditional architectural colors are available; seewww.Iithonia.com/ archcolors. Striping is also available. OPTICALSYSTEM—Segmented reflectorsforsuperioruniformityand control. Reflec- tors are interchangeable.Three full cutoff distributions available: FT(forward throw), MD (mediumthrow)and WT(wide throw). ELECTRICALSYSTEM—Ballast50W-150W utilizes a high reactance, high powerfactor ballast Metal halide 150W and below are standard with pulse-starttechnology.35S utilizes a reactance high power factor ballast 175W utilizes a constant -wattage au- totransformer ballast Quick disconnect plug easily disconnects reflector from ballast. Ballasts are copper -wound and 100%factory-tested. CSA, NOM or INTL required for probe startshipments outside ofthe US for 175M. Notavailable 175M SCWA. Ceramic metal halide lamps are recommended for use in applications where superior color rendition, lumen maintenance and longer lamp life are desired. Socket Porcelain,medium-base socketwith copper alloy, nickel -plated screw shell and center contact ULlisted660W,600V4KVpulse rated. INSTALLATION —Universal mounting mechanism with integral mounting supportallows fixturetohinge down. Bubblelevel provides correctalignmentwith each installation. LISTING —UL Listed (standard). CSA Certified (see Options). Suitable forwetlocations (damp location listed in lens -up orientation).WLU option offerswet loc ation listing in up orientation (see Options),IP65 rated.25°C ambient NOTE: Specifications subject to change without notice. Catalog Number Notes Type Decorative Wall -Mounted Lighting WST METAL HALIDE 50W-175W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 35W-150W Specifications Length: 16.25 (41.21 Depth: 9.13 (23.2) Overall Height: 7.25 (18.4) *Weight 30 Ibs (13.6 kg) *Weight as configured in example below. All dimensions are inches (centimeters) unless otherwise specified. ORDERING INFORMATION WST WST Wattage/source High Ceramic pressure metal sodium halide 35S1 50MHC 50S 70MHC 70S 100MHC 100S 150MHC 150S Metal halide 50M 70M 100M 150M 175M19 Distribution FT Forward throw MD Medium throw (coated lamp std.) WT Wide throw NOTES: 1 120V. 2 Must specify CWI for use in Canada. 3 Optional multi -tap ballast (120, 208, 240, 27N); (120, 277, 34N in Canada; ships as 120V/347V►. 4 Available with 150M or 150MHC only. 5 Consult factory for available wattages. 6 Not available with ELED, SF, DF, EC or QRS. 7 Not available with ELED, QRS or DCs. 8 Not available with ELED, EC or DCs. 9 Maximum wattage 100M, 70S.Must specify 120V or 277V. Not available with QRS, EC or DC. 10 Not available with DC options. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 For shortest lead times, configure product using standard options (shown in bold). Example: WST 100M FT TB LPI 120 2082 2402 277 347 TB' 23050HZ5 Ballast (blank) Magnetic ballast CWI Constant wattage isolated alseStart SCWA Super CWA pulse sta rt ballast' Maximum allowable wattage lamp included. Not available with Medium Throw (MD, MDU, MDUS) distributions. Must be ordered with fixture; cannot be field installed. Not available with 347V. May be ordered as an accessory with prefix "WS". Must specify finish. See www.lithonia.com/archcolors for additional color options. Black finish only. Must be specified. These wattages do not comply with California Title 20 regulations. Options Shiooed installed in fixture SF Single fuse120,277,347V10 DF Double fuse208,240V10 DC12 Emergency circuit 12volt (35W lamp included std.? 2DC12 Emergency circuitl2volt(2,35W lamps included? DC2012 Emergencycircuit12volt(20W lamp included? 20C2012 Emergency circuit 12 volt (2, 20W lamps included? ELED Emergency LED secondarysource battery pack with time delay (-4°F min. operating temperature? 2ELED Emergency LED secondary source (two modules) battery pack with time delay (-4°F min. operating temperature? DR Diffusing lens EC Emergencycircuit7•11 IBS Internal backlightshield12 PE Photoelectric cell -button type (n/a TB)13,14 QRS Quartz restrike systeme.lt WLU Wet location door for up orientation CSA CSA Certified NOM NOM Certified5 INTL International shipmentfor 175M Shipped separately BBW Surface -mounted back boxt5 UT5 Uptilt5degreest5 WG Wire guard13 VG Vandalguard13 Lamp" LPI Lamp included L/LP Less lamp Finish16 (blank) DSST DNAT DWHG DBLB CR Dark bronze, textured Sandstone, textured Natural aluminum, textured White, textured Black, textured Enhanced corrosion resistant CRT Non-stick protective coating17 oft NIGHTTIME FRIENDLY Consistent with LEED" goals & Green Globes'. criteria for light pollution reduction Outdoor Sheet #: WST-M-S BM-125 WST Metal Halide, High Pressure Sodium Building Mounted WST 150MHC FT LTL11069P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) O15 0 3 4 5 -2 1w x O Ozz 0 12 0 2co z 3g- ut U z 4F cn 5 6 150W pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 14000 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 52.9% Initial Lamp Lumens Mounting Height Metal Halide 10' 12' 14' 16' 50W MH 3,900 0.43 0.30 0.22 0.17 70W MH 5,500 0.62 0.43 0.31 0.24 100W MH 8,500 0.95 0.66 0.48 0.37 150W MH 12,500 1.41 0.98 0.72 0.55 175W MH 12,800 1.44 1.0 0.73 0.56 High Pressure Sodium 35W HPS 2,250 0.26 0.18 0.13 0.10 50W HPS 4,000 0.45 0.31 0.23 0.17 70W HPS 6,400 0.72 0.50 0.37 0.28 100W HPS 9,500 1.07 0.74 0.54 0.41 150W HPS 16,000 1.80 1.25 0.91 0.70 WST 150MHC MD LTL11068P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) 0 2 3 4 5 -2 O 1w x 0 0}_ z 12 u. 2I z 3Z u O Z 4F 0 5 6 150W pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 12500 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 60.2% Emergency Option Lamp Compatibility Lamp Options (# lamps/wattages) DC12 2DC12 DC2012 2DC2012 EC ELED 2ELED 35S • • • ■ i ■ ■ 50S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 70S • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 100S ■ • ■ ■ ■ 150S ■ • ■ III ■ 50M ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ 70M ■ ■ ■ ! ■ ■ ■ 100M ■ ■ • IN ■ ■ ■ 150M ■ ■ IN ■ i 175M ■ • ■ ■ ■ WST 150MHC WT LTL11070P ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) 5 2 IA 0.25 0 2 3 4 5 -2 0 x 1w x t7 OF z 0 1g O 2! z 3 w U 4� 5 6 150W pulse start metal halide lamp, horizontal lamp orientation Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 14000 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 62.5% 4 L/THON/A L/GHT/NG® An McuityBrands Company Sheet #: WST-M-S ©2003-2010 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 6/10/10 Lithonia Lighting Outdoor Lighting One Lithonia Way, Conyers, GA 30012 Phone:770-922-9000 Fax:770-918-1209 www.lithonia.com r Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: June 30, 2010 APPLICANT: Liesl Benson CASE NO.: 10-23 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Stella Fashion Boutique LOCATION: 308 Chestnut St E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: DMU - Downtown Mixed Use ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: July 6, 2010 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plannery DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a wall sign and projecting sign for 308 Chestnut St E in the Central Business District. No lighting is proposed for either sign in the application. The wall sign is proposed to contain the business name "Stella Fashion Boutique" in antique silver letters on a black background. The wall sign is 20' wide with 12" tall letters for a total sign area of 20 square feet. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 36 feet long facing Chestnut St E The total sign area of the proposed sign is 20 square feet and meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 308 Chestnut St E Page 2 The applicant is also requested approval to install a projecting sign that contains the words "Fashion Boutique". The proposed projecting sign is 21-inches tall by 45-inches. The shape of the sign makes it less than six square feet in size. The sign is proposed to contain the words "fashion boutique" in fuchsia on a silver background with black accents. The Commission in the past has allowed a second sign when it contains only descriptive words such. Using that premises, this sign would appear to be compliant. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. The signs shall not be lit. 3. No additional signage without approval of the HPC. FINDINGS The proposal meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual and the Stillwater zoning ordinance. attachments: Applicant's Form Elevation Drawing showing sign f Case No: a ,C �`"a 3 Date File' r Gi9J Ott Receipt No.: , Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project oe � t-,ES--NL,-r- e^c-r- A sse sso r's Parcel No. 2E.v ,c,- tool Zoning District c.-e c' Description of Project in detail s.tc, rs/AL, Fo By S +r-i S STet-A.-P, 3oS '7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required Property Owner s o,;-r Mailing Address Ilto City State Zip (-cc:0/,2- Telephone No. los I- '1-«207-- S:\Planning\design review permit.wpd Representative +..,1e5A_. rJ Mailing Address trot ,•12--0 City State Zip L->_.wa. , e-ta M N ssoe>2- Telephone No. tpst-4-3�,- ��35 April 12, 2002 i- 2 lli m d Uj 'A J Iy J ) ) I � vQD a ) 2) a tl 4 4 ) 4 J w Q A u ) j Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 Re: Veterans Memorial Plaque Message: The HPC discussed the proposed Veterans Memorial Plaque at their April 5th meeting. At that time the Commission raised concerns with the proposed text and wanted additional details including its location, size and the photo that was going to be used for the high school on the plaque. Since the April 5th meeting, staff has held a number of discussions with members of the Veterans Memorial Committee on the plaque. Specifically raised was both the Commission's and staff's concern with the use of "hallowed ground" on the plaque since this is a multiple use site. The Veterans Memorial Committee has discussed it and wishes to use the term. Members of the Veterans Memorial Committee will be at the HPC's July 7th meeting to discuss the issue with the Commission. Under the terms of a municipal license, any changes to the Veteran War Memorial site are required to be approved by the City Council. In this case, it is the HPC's role to make a recommendation to the Council on the appropriateness of the plaque. The Commission should review the request and make a recommendation to the City Council. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP City Planner -City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street -Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 Fax: 651.430-8810 email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission April 5, 2010 eberman summarized the motion as approval of the designs as presented and conditio -xcept for changing condition No. 12 to include the addition of the U.S. Postal Service identific- - • with the 107 signage. Mr. Hoefler asked why signage couldn't be placed at the location in question . .e west elevation (No. 38) if that meets the requirement of the code. Mr. Johnson pointed out the s . • uidelines look at placing signage near the point of entry. Mr. Lieberman said he didn't feel com o : . e imposing a condition regarding the Postal Service signage without knowing whether there ar 4 - ain government regulations regarding signage; Mr. Johnson noted this has been an issue in se •revious discussions. After discussion, it was decided to eliminate the sign package from the •royal. Mr. Lieberman restated the motion to accept the revised plan as conditioned, with the •ackage to be submitted and considered by the Commission at a later date. Mr. Lieberman ad . the applicant to contact the Postal Service regarding any regulations that may impact the si• •e and to keep Mr. Pogge informed of any communication with the Postal Service. Mr. Zah seconded the motion. Mr. Johnson suggested identifying the plans as those submitted 3/19/2010,--cifically excluding the sign package (package 8) from the approval. Mr. Johnson's suggestio -s incorporated into the motion; motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Stillwater Veterans site — Mr. Pogge reviewed the request from the Veterans Memorial group to place a plaque near the memorial spire. He said the request is for a separate, free-standing plaque that addresses the historical significance of the site itself. He said the proposal is to place the plaque along Third Street. Mr. Tomten suggested asking the group to submit a proposal with additional details, location, size, etc. Mr. Pogge said the group would also like to put a storage shed for rakes, etc at the site. He said staff would work with the group and place the shed in the lower level Cub parking area where it will not be visible. Mr. Tomten said he was a bit troubled by the proposed verbiage in the site plaque suggesting it may further complicate relations between the Veterans Memorial people and the farmers' market use. Mr. Pogge said the original intent, as he understood it from discussions, was to recognize the site as the former Stillwater High School site. No action was taken regarding the plaque pending more information about the details. a• e Preservation Awards — Mr. Pogge spoke in favor of the Dairy Queen building. Mr. Tomte •gested the Dairy Queen building for building restoration and what is now the Olive Oil Compan ew facade. Mr. Bracht suggested restoration of the private home at 519 Laurel St. W.; Mr. . on agreed that would be a good recipient as this was a foreclosure property likely headed for lition. Other items Mr. Pogge noted while the South Main Stre- chaeological District has been determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Histo • aces, objection from a private property owner has prevented such inclusion at this time. Howev r. Pogge said that may occur sometime in the future. Mr. Pogge also told the Commission the • _ has received $8,000 in a CLG grant. He also noted that the Commission's annual report to th- torical Society was included in the packet. Mr. Pogge reminded members their retreat session h •-en scheduled for June 30. 6 �. W©9 — 1,t3 e- m /'5 -�- �'► i I0„,c1tie coev, kro 4--e_ L - -- -14 N ®T 6.3-21 c w CA-5 5 ,-2v This was the site of Stillwater Senior and Junior High Schools from 1887 - 1994. The Stillwater Veterans Memorial was built on this land and dedicated on Memorial Day 2004. The plaques on the Wall of Honor Spire list the names of veterans who attended Stillwater Schools and died in service to their country. A gold star on their paver is the symbol of this sacrifice. Other veterans are honored with granite pavers along the Memorial walkways. This Memorial is hallowed ground for all Veterans who are remembered here. Honoring Our Heroes, then, now, and forever. 5 UO r cf--7 / fr:T441-7 � 5 rek tea, 4 r l7 i.-Q February 5, 2010 Veterans jiremorlazf P.O. Box 137, Stillwater, MN 55082-0137 • Phone: 651-439-7796 • Fax: 651- 439-4350 Heritage Preservation Commission City of Stillwater City Hall Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sirs and Madams: Subject: Stillwater Veterans Memorial Site Input and Consideration of Plaque and Storage Shelter On theadvise of Assistant Development Director, Mr. Mike Pogge, we write the Historic Preservation Commission to request input and consideration of the addition of a historic bronze plaque desired to be placed near to the memorial spire. Also advise and input is requested as to a suitable location, style, and dimensions for a storage shelter to house site maintenance tools and equipment and event storage of tables and chairs. The bronze plaque would be an historic informational plaque with an image of the original Stillwater High School in relief with text describing the connection with student attendees and the students listed on plaques on the spire as well as other students and other veterans honored at the site with granite pavers. The attachments provide specifications, an image of the school, and the text that has been chosen. There would be conformity to the other memorial plaques in terms of the length to width proportions, the borders, font style, and proportionate font size. It is suggested that the grass and shrub area ahead (east) of the parking area on Fourth Street may be a suitable location for an appropriate style and sized storage shed. At that location it would be reasonably accessible yet not in direct view from the upper Riverview Parking Lot and behind cars parked in the Fourth Street lot. Thank you in advance for your input and consideration. Please advise if you would wish a representative from the Stillwater Veterans Memorial to attend the meeting when these issues would be discussed. Thank you Yours truly, Miriam Madsen 439-4401 Jahn Kraemer 439-4350 Honoring Our Heroes, then, now, and forever. Oakview In loving memory of 1lVillia H Lumberg o under .TPS, Inc: 1949-2006 T2IIs PtoPERF\ LA( ED (iW N AT ( Y T1F UIII-TED STATES E'4R`1;MFNT OF INTERIQI( U[LT.1902 Where to Use Gemini Plaques: • Universities, Public Buildings, Golf Courses & Casinos • Monument Signs & Entrances • Dedications, Awards & Recognitions • For upscale wayfinding and ADA applications • Boardroom or Lobby signage for maximum impression For Etched Plaques see page 100 For Metal ADA Plaques see page 103 FOUR :CORNERS COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER MAYOR GEOR(iE I.,ANDER BOARD MEMBERS ANN TURLEY JOSEPII C'I-IESFLR ERNESr OSTER MAN 13ARHA\RA RYORE,('K FR EDER ICK 1It)DSON CAROLINE MILLS ARCIIITFCT S('o1' 1 McNIANUS ;5RClll'1'I (' I JFFFF:RSONVILI.ii, ('AI.LI ORNI CONTRACTORS RFYN'OLI)S CON FRACIORS. 1N(' SAl.1fM, CAI.IPORNIA DFDICATf(1) l IWRUARY geminiplaques.com 1-877-877-2922 91 MATERIALS Alloy 220 Commercial Alloy C46400 Alloy 5052 EDGES Other Edges & Bevels Are Available. Call For Quote. Single Line Double Line Single Line Wide Bevel Single Line Bevel No Border COLORS Custom Colors Available. $70 Gemini has 45 standard baked enamel colors (inside back cover), but if you can't find the one that fits your needs we can match your own color. Add $70 to match your own color or to add an additional standard color. Black TEXTURES CM Dark Oxide Brown Duranodic Bronze 92 Letters, Logos & Plaques This is the site of Stillwater Senior and Junior High Schools from 1887-1994. The Stillwater Veterans Memorial was built on this site and dedicated on Memorial Day 2004. The plaques on the Wall of Honor Spire contain the names of veterans who attended Stillwater schools and died serving their country. A gold star is the symbol of their sacrifice. Other veterans are honored with granite pavers along the Memorial walkways. This Memorial is hallowed ground for all veterans of U.S and allied military service. Honoring Our Heroes, then, now, and forever. The plaque image will be in reverse with raised brass lettering, border, and image of the Stillwater school with an otherwise black background. The plaque will be mounted on a single post secured to an underground concrete footing, positioned vertically or at a slight angle at an appropriate viewing height in the general area of the Veterans Memorial spire. MUNICIPAL LICENSE The CITY OF STILLWATER, a Home Rule City of the Third Class ("City"), hereby grants a license to the VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMITTEE (the "Committee"), its agents, contractors and assigns, on the following terms and conditions: 1. The municipal property that is subject to this License is an area described as follows (the "Property"): Part of Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 36, of the Original Town now City of Stillwater and the public sidewalk adjacent thereto, as depicted on the map attached as Exhibit "A." 2. The Committee and their contractors and agents are granted a non—exclusive right to use the Property to construct and operate a Veteran War Memorial (the "Memorial") and use the adjacent sidewalk to install pavers bearing the names of donors. 3. The rights granted are non-exclusive and are subject to the superior right of the City that may, at any time, preempt any rights granted by this License for any public purpose. 4. Any material changes in the design of the Memorial must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. 5. Befoze construction of the Memorial may begin, sufficient funds must be dedicated to pay forany labor or materials used in the construction and an endowment must be established in a an amount sufficient to fund maintenance of the Memorial. 6. The ultimate design of the Memorial must be reviewed and approved by the City Building Official and a building permit must be obtained for the construction. 7. The sidewalk paver program must be developed in a manner that will not, in the opinion of the City Engineer, block or impede pedestrian traffic. The sidewalk must be kept free of trash or storage and regularly swept. The pavers may not interfere with any public utilities located in the street or the street surface. The pavers must be installed according to a schedule and plan approved by the City Engineer. Paver installation may begin immediately. 1 8. This License is granted on an "at will" basis with no assurances of renewal, and no vested rights of any sort may be obtained by use of the Property hereunder. 9. The City reserves the right to impose additional conditions on this License, if needed, to protect the health, safety and welfare of the City. 10. This License will be in effect immediately and will terminate, if not sooner, by thirty (30) days written advance notice. 11. In view of the uncertain term of the License and the limited rights granted, no license fee will be charged. 12. The Committee must insure the Property in an amount of at least Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($750,000.00) of combined limits and must name the City as an additional insured on the policy "as its interest might appear" and must provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing such coverage. 13. The Committee also agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any claims, cause of action, suits or injuries that might arise or grow out of its use of the Property and the exercise of its rights under this License. 2002. Approved by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 44`141' day of CITY OF STILLWATER ATTEST: Diane F. Ward, Its City Clerk 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss COUNTY OF WASHINGTON The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ..JUA112..- 2002, by Jay L. Kimble, Mayor, and Diane F. Ward, Clerk, for the City of Stillwater. KATHERINE M. ROGNESS NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1.31.2005 Notary Public ACCEPTANCE The terms of this License are accepted by the undersigned this l day of , STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ,a007 The Mt- by COMMITTEE. VETERANS NjEMO RI®La COMMITTEE By: ) ss regoing instrument was ac owledged before me this day of ‘11f-toce71%.6 ; the , of the VETERANS MEMO THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: David T. Magnuson (#66400) Magnuson Law Firm 333 North Main Street, Suite 202 P.O. Box 438 Stillwater, MN 55082 651/439-9464 (telephone) 651/439-5641 (fax) Notary Public SUSAN L O'BRIEN-MOORE NOTARY PUBLIC -MIN ESOTA woolmBBLONoamESott31/ 1e 3 rdrthi/ refit a h 'lops to vomits •kglot .µapaeca ruling 1 handicap rta!J whkular antranu Dit 6hrrt fins 6r+rrt Exhibit "A" rrhkular entrance earthy Isc - 72 ;paces („dully 4 h.n4kar ataJbj add ►bet prdastrbn oroaaaalk focal pint (optbso nury 'naafi drooratJw pool and fountain. Mtarprotlro 'heifer and/or artawrtj • parting bt - O1 rpaeaa (including 4 handicap ataNaj