HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-06-09 CPC MINi
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 9, 1997
Present: Jerry Fontaine, chairman
Glenna Bealka, John Rheinberger, Kirk Roetman,
Don Valsvik, Tom Wiedner and Terry Zoller
Others: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
Absent: Dave Charpentier and Darwin Wald
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Rheinberger, moved approval of the minutes of
May 12, 1997; all in favor.
Case No. SUP/V/97-24 A special use permit for residential use and
variance to the parking requirements, 18 provided, 42 required, for the
renovation of 6,500 sq. ft. commercial space and addition of a new second
and third floor (11 housing units) at 124 S. Second St. in the CBD, Central
Business District. Jon Whitcomb, applicant.
• Mr. Whitcomb and Mr. Dave Brooks were present for the discussion. Mr.
Whitcomb provided architectural renderings of the building plans and
photos of the current site. He provided a letter from the current owner of
the building regarding the use of the Gazette parking lot. Mr. Whitcomb
also said he had discussions with Mr. Mahoney, Gazette publisher, in which
Mr. Mahoney indicated he would allow building tenants to use the Gazette
portion of the lot during non-work hours. There are a total of 45 spaces in
the parking lot between Mr. Whitcomb's proposed building and the Gazette.
Mr. Russell said for the Gazette spaces to "count," there would have to be a
written contract/agreement with the Gazette allowing use on weekends
and non-work hours.
Mr. Valsvik asked about the plans for the commercial space. Mr. Whitcomb
said there would be three tenants occupying 2,000 square feet of space
and said he had interest expressed from several potential tenants.
Wayne Wohlers of Kinsel's Liquor, 118 E. Chestnut St., expressed his firm's
concern about granting the parking variance and adding to the existing
parking problems. He also noted that the Gazette lot is full all day and
already is being used by non-employees/non-tenants.
f
Dick Kilty noted that when he remodeled his building at 200 S. Third St.
for mixed commercial/residential use, he complied with the parking
requirements to provide an enclosed garage space for each tenant as well
as the required number of spaces for the commercial use. He suggested
that Mr. Whitcomb also could comply with the requirements without any
hardship.
John Bourdaghs, Shorty's Cleaners, 121 E. Chestnut St., also expressed his
concern about the parking variance. He noted that he provides 20+ spaces
for his employees and customers.
Roger Tomten, 718 S. Fifth St., chair of the Heritage Preservation
Commission, spoke in favor of the project. He said the project would be an
attractive asset to the downtown. He also stated it is important to retain
the validity of the downtown area by providing a customer base for
grocery, hardware stores, etc.
Mr. Brooks, partner in the proposed project, spoke of his experience in
downtown St. Paul. He said "eventually" the city of Stillwater will find an
answer to its parking problem. Mr. Wohlers responded that "eventually"
could be a long way off and doesn't help the existing situation.
Mr. Zoller said he liked the idea of residential use in the downtown area
but has a real concern with parking requirements, especially the
requirement to provide covered parking spaces for residents.
Mr. Valsvik spoke of the experience Trinity Lutheran Church has had with
its private lot which is used so heavily that often times there's not
enough spaces for the church's use.
Mr. Rheinberger moved to deny the requested variance/special use permit.
Mr. Roetman seconded the motion for purposes of discussion. Mr. Roetman
suggested offering the developers an opportunity to come back to the
Planning Commission with a "creative alternative" to provide residential
parking. Mr. Zoller said he was persuaded by Mr. Kilty's argument that
enclosed parking for residents could be provided with an altered building
design.
Motion to deny passed 6-1, with Mrs. Bealka voting against the motion.
Case No. V/97-28 A variance to the front yard setback (15'3" feet
requested, 30 feet required) for construction of a two story, 2,000
square-foot addition to an existing single family residence at 2318 Boom
Road in the RA, One Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland
• District. William C. Messner, applicant.
Mr. Messner was present for the discussion. He said the existing garage is
15'3" from the property line. There was some question as to whether the
roof over the requested upper porch would be enclosed. Mr. Messner
explained the request is for a roof/eaves only to keep the weather out. Mr.
Russell said if both ends of the upper porch are open, he would not object
to the proposal.
Mr. Russell noted the request has been sent to the DNR for review; the DNR
comments had not been received at the time of the meeting. The request
also has to go before the City Council.
Mr. Zoller, seconded by Mr. Roetman, moved approval as conditioned. Motion
passed 6-1, with Mr. Wiedner voting no.
Case No. V/97-29 A variance to the front and side yard setbacks for a 6
foot extension of a porch and the construction of a two-car garage with a
shop above at 602 N. Fifth St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Amy Senn, applicant.
The applicant and her husband, Jason Ruddie, were present for the
discussion. Ms. Senn presented a list of 33 signatures of neighbors
indicating there were in agreement with the proposed project. She said
the space above the garage primarily would be used to store tools as the
couple is in the process of restoring their home; the space would not be
used for any business purpose.
Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Rheinberger, moved approval as conditioned.
Mr. Zoller said he thought the proposed improvements would add to the
entire neighborhood, and Mr. Fontaine noted the setback encroachment
already exists. Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/DR/97-30 A variance and design review for four signs, one
allowed, for a restaurant located at 14200 60th St. N. in the BP-C,
Business Park Commercial District. Prowood Signs Inc., applicant.
Tom Steinke, representing Prowood Signs, was present for the discussion.
He explained the requested sign package and provided colored drawings of
the requested signs.
•
Jim Blichfeldt, developer of nearby twin-homes, expressed his concern
about the requested sign on the western elevation of the building. He also
• questioned the use of block on the rear elevation of the building.
Wayne Branum, no address given, asked how far the request deviates from
the sign ordinance. Mr. Russell noted that the requested pylon sign is
within the ordinance guidelines. He also noted that adjacent businesses,
Baker's Square and Rose Floral, also have signs on the front of the
building, in addition to a pylon sign.
John Bourdaghs, Shorty's Cleaner, pointed out that when he opened his
drop-off business in River Heights Plaza, he was not allowed to put a sign
on the front of the building. The only signage he was allowed was a
"cleaners" sign on the main Plaza sign. He suggested that if the city has an
ordinance, it should be enforced.
Ken Muller representing Famous Dave's restaurant noted that the
restaurant closes at 10 p.m. and the sign lights will be turned off at that
time. He said the request is for nothing more than already exists on
Highway 36 businesses. He further said if something has to be eliminated,
the developers would prefer to eliminate the signs on the side of the
building. Mr. Steinke said he thought the front entry signs served an
• important function.
Mr. Rheinberger, seconded by Mr. Valsvik, moved approval of the requested
pylon sign and the requested sign on the front elevation. Motion passed 6-
1, with Mr. Wiedner voting no.
Case No. SUP/V/97-31 A special use permit and variance for construction
of a detached two-story garage structure with an efficiency dwelling unit
on the second level at 1213 Fifth Ave. S. in the RB, Two-Family
Residential District. Kari Nickeson-Ranum, applicant.
Karl Ranum represented the applicant, his wife, and made a presentation
outlining their proposed plans. He said the request for the efficiency
apartment on the second level of the garage was merely to take advantage
of the two-family zoning. The only variance issue is the height of the
structure which is 24 feet versus the allowable 20 feet. (Later in the
discussion, Mr. Russell said the height of the structure meets the
ordinance as it is a gabled roof.)
Ron Anderson of the Stillwater Water Department noted that the existing
water service to the property is a 3/4 inch line and would not be adequate
for additional living quarters.
Mr. Russell explained staff's recommendation that the proposed use needs
additional study and development of design guidelines. Specifically, he
said the factors outlined in paragraph five of staff's recommendation need
to be studied and guidelines developed.
Mr. Rheinberger moved to deny the request; motion died for lack of a
second. Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mr. Rheinberger, moved to continue the
request in order to study the impact and address the issues as outlined by
staff. Motion passed 6-1, with Mr. Wiedner opposed.
Case No. SUP/97-32 A special use permit for a chiropractic practice from
a residence located at 1055 W. St. Croix Avenue in the RA, One-Family
Residential District. Judd Orff, representing Nina Amundson, applicant.
Terry Christianson was present representing Dr. Margaret Mitchell. He
explained that Dr. Mitchell's current office space lease is expiring and she
would like to operate her practice from the residence at 1055 W. St. Croix
Ave., which she is renting, until she can find a new, permanent office
space.
Rich Cummings, 1060 Amundson Drive, introduced a delegation of
neighbors opposed to the request. Mr. Cummings noted that St. Croix
Avenue is an unimproved street. He said parking is an issue, as is the fact
that the request is to operate a home business from rental property.
Speaking in opposition to the request were Rick Kuula, 1241 Amundson
Circle; Marge Jordahl, 1115 Amundson Drive; Allan Downey; and Jeff
Hands, 1135 Amundson Drive. Concerns centered on the potential for
additional traffic; the fact that the area is heavily used by children; and
the fact that the street is unimproved. Shelly Michaelis, 1341 Dallager
Court, a realtor, noted there is a lot of commercial property available for
rent.
Mr. Christianson said Dr. Mitchell only sees one patient an hour, and her
office is only open from 9:30 to 6:30 Monday through Wednesday. He said
the doctor has set herself a deadline of Oct. 1 for finding a permanent
location for her practice.
0
Mr. Roetman asked if the ordinance has any stipulation regarding the use
of a rental residence for a home-based business. Mr. Russell said the
ordinance has no such stipulation.
Mr. Fontaine said he was concerned because of the unimproved road and
difficult access to the property.
Mr. Rheinberger, seconded by Mrs. Bealka, moved to deny the request based
on the safety issue; motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/97-33 A variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required,
19 feet proposed) for construction of a 12 x 16 deck at 924 N. Everett St.
in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Scott and Jody Stoltz,
applicant.
The Stoltzes were present for the discussion. Mrs. Stoltz explained they
built the deck and then received a letter stating they needed a permit and
a variance. She said the placement of the deck eliminates a previous water
problem, and she said she had signatures from neighbors, none of whom
were opposed to the deck.
Mr. Valsvik moved approval, noting the deck improves the appearance of
the house but reminding the Stoltzes they should have come before the
Planning Commission before constructing the deck. Mr. Rheinberger
seconded the motion; all in favor.
Case No. PUD/97-34 A planned unit development for the construction of
seven single-family, two-story homes with shared driveways at 1303-
1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential District. John
Roettger, applicant.
Case No. SUB/97-35 A resubdivision for lots 16-22, Block 1, Churchill's
Second Addition, and the north 30 feet of lot 15, Block 1, and the south 27
feet of Lot 23, Block 1, Churchill's Second Addition into seven single-
family lots at 1303-1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential
District. John Roettger, applicant.
Mr. Roettger and Shelley Michaelis were present for the discussion. Mr.
Wiedner excused himself from the discussion as his firm has represented
Mr. Roettger.
Mr. Roettger said his plans have changed. He will be constructing six,
rather than seven homes, as he has been unable to come to an agreement to
Ig purchase the additional property that would enable the seventh unit. He
explained his plans for construction of Victorian style, three bedroom
homes; all will have front porches and several will have back
4D porches/decks.
The proposed street setback is 30 feet. It was noted the front setback
could be reduced as existing homes in the area have a 20-25 front setback.
Al Ehnert, 1324 S. Fifth St. said he was happy the number of units had been
reduced.
A resident, who did not identify himself, expressed concern about
retention of the existing trees at the rear property line. Michael Anderson,
1312 S. Fourth St., also expressed a concern about retaining the trees and
a concern about the appearance of the homes from the rear. Jane Haas,
1222 S. Fourth St., asked about market value of the new homes and
whether an excavation plan would be submitted. Ron Anderson, 216 W.
Orleans St., expressed a concern about existing drainage from his property
and potential cost to himself. Lee Petersen, 1334 S. Fourth St., asked
whether the style of the garages would be similar to the style of the
homes. The neighbors were generally in favor of the project.
There was some discussion regarding the concerns about drainage. Mr.
Zoller noted the developer will have to work with the city engineer before
final construction plans are approved. Mr. Zoller asked whether the
developer will have to pay a park dedication fee since the request is for a
planned unit development; Mr. Russell will check on that requirement.
Mr. Rheinberger moved approval of the six unit PUD and accompanying
resubdivision with the five conditions of approval. Mr. Roetman seconded
the motion. Motion passed unanimously, with Mr. Wiedner abstaining.
Case No. ZAT/97-1 An amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding zoning
for newly annexed land. Agricultural Preservation, AP Land. City of
Stillwater, applicant.
Mr. Russell explained that the new Agricultural Preservation zoning would
be something of a "holding zone" for the annexation area.
Mr. Wiedner, seconded by Mr. Zoller, moved approval; motion passed
unanimously.
n
u
Case No. SUP/94-2 Request for extension of special use permit for trailer
in parking lot at 216 W. Myrtle St. in the PA, Public Administration
District. Trinity Lutheran Church, applicant.
Steve Whitehouse of Family Service St. Croix explained the request and
reason the extension is needed. Mr. Valsvik excused himself from the
discussion due to his association with Trinity Lutheran Church; Mr.
Wiedner excused himself due to his association with Warm World.
Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Roetman, moved approval of the requested
extension to March 1, 1999. Motion passed unanimously, with Mr. Valsvik
and Mr. Wiedner abstaining.
Other business
• Long Lake ordinance - After a brief discussion, members agreed the
draft Long Lake ordinance prepared by staff was a fair representation of
what had been decided at the joint meeting with the Park and Rec Board.
Mr. Rheinberger, seconded by Mr. Roetman, moved to recommend the draft
ordinance for consideration by the City Council; motion passed
unanimously.
Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mrs. Bealka, moved to adjourn at 10:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary