Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-06-16 CC MIN• no COUNCIL CHAIBER Stillwater, Minnesota June 16, 1981 4:00 P. M. REGULAR MEETING The meeting was called to order by Mayor Junker. Present: Councilwomen Avise and Bodlovick, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and Mayor Junker ra w® Absent: Also Present: Press: Citizens: INDIVIDUALS AND DELEGATIONS 1. RICHARD AND KAY CHILSON appeared before the Council regarding the transfer of the liquor license from Marty Anderson for the Mad Capper Saloon. On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilwoman Avise, the Council authorized the transfer of the liquor license for the Mad Capper Saloon from Marty Anderson to Richard and Kay Chilson. (all in favor) 2. PAUL WYLER of the Youth Service Bureau appeared with Steve Studer, Bruce Klosowsky, Jim Behrenbrinker and Gerri Granquist requesting that the Council not cut their funding since this amount is matched by other agencies - this bureau has a positive effect on the kids and there has been a great deal of planning gone into setting up this service by the various service and civic organizations in the community. It is an extremely valuable resource for the juveniles and their families in the community. There was discussion with the City Attorney and the Council about pulling the funds for this year and the City Attorney felt that would be unwise and could cause some legal action. The problems of funding these agencies is brought about by the rescheduling of the monies that the City will be receiving from the State of Minnesota. The Council concurred that they not change their commitment at this time and go one step at a time and did not feel that any action was necessary at this time - they did not want to disturb their commitments for this year. PUBLIC SAFETY No report FIRE CHIEF No report None Finance Director - Coordinator, Kriesel City Clerk - Schnell Cuty Attorney - Magnuson Public Safety Director - Abrahamson Superintendent of Public Works - Shelton Director of Parks and Recreation - Blekum Fire Chief - Chial Building Official - Zepper St. Paul Dispatch - Broede Richard and Kay Chilson, Gerri Granquist, Paul Wyler, Steve Studer, Bruce Klosowsky COMMITTEE REPORTS BUILDING OFFICIAL MR. ZEPPER brought up again the matter of licensing rental units within the City of Stillwater and he recommended the fee schedule for same. After considerable discussion and a recommendation from the City Attorney that we should be able to work with the ordinances that we have on the books - there is plenty of power there. It was suggested that Mr. Abrahamson and Mr. Zepper inspect and red tag any units that are unsalfe. • L / . 425 • • • '406 PUBLIC WORKS No report June 16, 1981 PARKS & RECREATION 1. On Beer Permits were motion f Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded fbyoCoCouncilwoman Avise, the following O 1. Nile Kriesel - 1COt0yPTou namentrk Croixwood Park - June 27, 1981 - - 2. R.Pierce Wedding Reception - Pioneer Park - August 15, 1981 - 2:00 to 5:00 P. M. 3. Johnson Bridegroom u, 000 Luncheon - 4:30 P. M. to Closing of Pioneer Park - 2. MR. BLEKUM informed the Council that the Hockey School is in operation at the Ice Arena and that the new dehumidification system is working very well - the beach is running and there are ballgames daily; Mr. Jagusch's yard has been completed. 3. was discussion about the tact Mr. Moelter about silt Nelson's work. Also Mr. Magnuson will have Dr. Nelson and Mr. Jagusch sign the necessary easements for these projects. CITY ATRORNEY'S REPORT 1. MR. MAGNUSON informed the Council that Riverside Crane is sueing the City and they are asking for $45,000 of damagesfor the wrongful awarding of the contract to Haines and they have appealed Judge Thoreen's ruling denying their motion for a temporary judgment to the Supreme Court and the City has twenty days to answer the notice. CITY COORDINATOR'S REPORT 1. MR. KRIESEL informed the Council that he received a letter from the Department of Transportation that based on the review on what happened on the oil spill they have determined that the fine will be $100 and if the City wishes they can have a public hearing on this matter - he felt that for $100 that we should pay this fine and send along a letter stating that we are not really agreeing to it. 2. MR. KRIESEL informed the Council that he received a phone call this date that the insurance company has paid the full bill for the clean -up of the oil spill - the full ' $8,800. 3. MR. KRIESEL informed the Council that there will be a meeting with the Physical Develop- ment Committee of the Metro Council for the discussion of the Water Quality Plan - they are going to be recommending that the Bayport Plant be phased out sometime between 1984 and 1989 and that an interceptor be constructed from Stillwater to Bayport and they would be served by the Stillwater Treatment Plant. If this is done there are 630 gallons per day now that would have to be set aside for Bayport - the three million gallons per day would take care of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights until 1995 which would allow almost 2,000 units before there would be a capacity problem. According to the committee the larger the volume, the more cost effective it becomes - he and Dave Magnuson do not feel that Bayport should be shut- down. MR. MAGNUSON explained in detail the various capacities of tie two plants and the differences in the unused capacities which could take care of 5,000 people before the year 2,000 - most of the plant expansions need federal monies and there are now about 12 plants looking for this money and with the money situation it might have to be funded locally. if a position is taken, it should be done by resolution and this would be more effective than one member attending this meeting - the issue would be if they do nec upgrade the Stillwater plant, it will be at the maximum with Bayport coming in and there would be room for any growth in the City of Stillwater. It was recommended that the Council attend this meeting on June 25, 1981 at 1:30 P. A. at the Metro Square Bldg. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS 1. COUNCILWOMAN BODLOVICK turned over to Mr. Kriesel the information on the grant monies for the C?ty's Comprehensive Plan.. • • 1 • • June 16, 1981 2. MAYOR JUNKER submitted the layout and proposal for the park by the Hi -Rise which he received from the Abrahamson Nursery - he would like to go to t,.e Margaret Rivers Foundation with that plan and ask for about $12,000 for this and then $25,000 for the new toilets for Lowell Park and another $3,000 to sod the little park by McKusick Lake which would be a total of $40,000.00. There was discussion about the property that will be needed by the Lowell Inn for parking - come up with the area that will be leased to them for parking. 3. MAYOR JUNKER informed the Council that the Engine 28 will be in Stillwater for Lumberjack Days for rides - the Department of Transportation is seeking permission to use the Burlington tracks between Aiples and The Freighthouse for the train rides. The Council was in agreement that the Engine should be brought back for use in the City as originally promised. 4. COUNCILWOMAN BODLOVICK presented a questionnaire from Mary Luth to Mr. Kriesel and he will contact her about same. On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Avise, the meeting recessed at 5:30 P. M. until 7:30 P. M. (all in favor) Attest: ,yl- ,.�✓4 e b./am/2i _ Citq Clerk Mayor 427' • • • • • 428 COUNCIL cki i GERS Stillwater, Minnesota June 16, 1981 7:3u P. M. RECESSED MEETING The meeting was reconvened by Mayor Junker. The Invocation was given by the City Clerk. Present: Councilwomen Avise and Bodlovick, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and Mayor Junker Absent: None Also Present: Press: Stillwater Gazette - Liberty Free Press - Julie Edstrom Citizens: Finance Director /Coordinator - Kriesel City Clerk - Schnell City Attorney - Magnuson Mrs. Ronald Buschman, Kevin Charlsen, Dick Colemeier, Tom Cropp, Jim Gannon, Dr. Ned Windmiller, Willys Jones, George Parker, Dr. Francis Kranz, Mr. & Mrs. James Koza INDIVIDUALS AND DELEGATIONS DICK COLEMIER, representing the Stillwater Fire Relief Association appeared before the Council regarding the adoption of their By -Laws - their membership has approved same and the Council must ratify same to authorize the change in the pension benefits from $600 to $1,000 for each year of service. They are fully funded for this increase. COUNCILMAN PETERSON asked why there was no sense of negotiations on this matter - this will be a 66 -2/3% increase and he felt that this is too great of an increase. MR. COLEMIER stated that this is what this money is to be used for and this is what the men want to do - this is insuring that they are able to keep qualified men in the department for the twenty year period - if they have gotten their increase two years ago - they started out with a statute limitation of $200 per year of service - they got special legislation through the Council and the State of Minnesota that allows them to raise these benefits to $600 per year service - they increased it from $200 to $400, from $400 to $500, $500 to $600 and they were frozen at the $600 figure until 1979 when the statutes were changed and the new funding formula came out making it apparent to the City what funding would be needed if the funds weren't there (in their case they are there) and that time they came back and asked for the $800 figure - the money has accumulated more and more over the years and at this point they are funded at $1,000 - COUNCILMAN PETERSON wondered when the legislature will realize that this funding is too great and possibly that the premiums that the people are paying to cover the insurance that causes the percentage to come into the firefighter's pension fund may have to be changed - what is happening is that the pension funds are being "fattened up ". He questioned if they would be back next year for $1,200. MR. COLEMIER stated that he did not think so - he felt that they are going to have to wait two years to see where the fund goes - the state chart runs this up to $2,000 per year service. The pension would be from day one for computing the given pensions. On motion of Councilwoman Avise, seconded by Councilman MacDonald, a resolution was introduced "APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION BY- LAWS" as presented. AYES -- Councilwoman Avise, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and Mayor Junker NAYS -- Councilwoman Bodlovick PUBLIC HEARINGS This was the day and time for the public hearing for the Industrial Revenue Bonds for the River Valley Professionals Project. Notice of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Evening Gazette, the official newspaper of the City on May 28, 1981. The Mayor opened the hearing. DR. NED WINDMILLER briefly explained the project and the location in the Industrial Park. • • • 1 • June 16, 1981 429 No one appeared as being opposed to this project. COUNCILMAN PETERSON was concerned about how freely they have been approving this type of bonding and he would like to see something come in that ae.._.. =cloy substantial people. COUNCILWOMAN BODLOVICK felt that this is possibly the only avenue that is available to anyone today for money The Mayor closed the hearing. On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilwoman Avise, a resolution was introduced "GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT. AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF SAID PROJECT TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES, DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH SAID PROJECT'. AYES -- Councilwomen Avise and Bodlovick, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and Mayor Junker NAYS- -None (see resolutions) 2. This was the day and time for the public hearing for Case no. 418 for a lot area variance for Ronald Buschman, 1215 Fifth Avenue South. Notice of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Evening Gazette, the official newspaper of the City and copies were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet. The Mayor opened the hearing explained what Avenue South property and showed JIM KOZA, 504 East St. Louis Street, detailed five reasons for being opposed to this request - (1) his lot and his neighbors are already too small being 6,600 square feet and this would make for a more crowded neighborhood; (2) septic system and the problems that the people are already experiencing; (3) parking with the n arrowness of the lot and problems in putting up a garage; (4) there is a possibility that they will have to come back for some other variances bacause of the size of the lot; (5) standards have already been set for this area in terms of how our City is going to be developed and that there have been a lot of exceptions made to these standards - he felt that we should try to comply with the standards that have been setup. He urged for the xi ection of this request. DR. FRANCIS KRANZ, 510 Eas: St. Louis Street, stated that they do not have City sewers as they are on bedrock and that there is opposition from other neighbors who are unable to be here this evening and he is not in favor of this at all. MRS. BUSCHMAN answered some of these comments by saying that this is for her in -laws and it is not a business venture; she has talked to some of the neighbors and they have never had a problem with their septic systems and she has never had a problem with hers - the only two homes that have had problems are Dr. Kranz and the Koza home - if the sherhadeatbuilder not come over and this look the property and it last thing they would do; it is plenty large enough to build a 20 x 30 or 40 foot house there and still have a good yard - there is also room enough for a driveway between this house and theirs and if they did put up a garage it would be in the back - it would not interfere with anyone else's property - none of the evergreens to the side would come down - she has contacted a company that does the pert tests and they felt that it was a good area. The Planning Commission approved this request contingent upon a satisfactory percolation test. There ws decision and the Councilumakes fact that Commission makes one MR. MAGNUSON stated that the general rule on sub - standard lots if that a person has no vested rights in their land or zoning classification of their land if it is bare - they can have vested rights and non - conforming rights if there is a structur a on sa 87that you cannottletzthenzoningspowerteliminateeall changed othe uses the law son' spy y of a person's property - but they say that if any use is there - any reasonable use - in this case she owns the adjacent property and you can if you apply the zoning ordinance strictly she can make some use of that property because it is adjacent to her present structure and it augments her yard space - if that person owned that lot and did nor own the adjacent property, the idea could be that no use could be made of it - it is particularly tough on these small lots when you say you cannot build on it and you would be depriving them the value of that lot - they have in many cases paid assessments on the lot and have paid taxes over the years - it is a question of fairness and it is discretionery and you can go either way on it. • • • ■ 1 • 4 30 June 16, 1981 ° "" ^^ JL'TKEE felt that the big hange^ i- the sewer and this does create pruble¢s- many of the people down there have spent tons of money and most of them have had poor sewer problems -. MRS. BUSCHMAN stated the other way that they would have to go is to add to their present home and put in another septic system so they would not have problems. DR. KRAP'Z felt that with putting the smallest house in there there will be very little side clearance - the Planning Commission passed it simply because they wanted to tack on some things - they were not happy about it - there is no curb- ing up there - there is no sewer and he did not know what kind of special assess- ments have been made on that property - the option was there to sell it - the people are taxed on the fact that they had a larger yard - there is property next door that could be purchased and she feels that the price is too high - he felt that this was a terrible idea. MRS. BUSCHMAN stated that the property next door is something that the bank will not touch - it will not FHA - it will not VA - it will not even go conventional and she did not have $25,000 down to pay for it - it is just a financial responsibility - -the special assessments was the paving of their street right after they moved in there. COUNCILWOMAN AVISE felt that the major issue here is the sewer and septic system and she would hate to see the City approve a system of that size. The Mayor closed the hearing. On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council postponed their decision on this matter until the next regular meeting so that they could physically view the property before the decision is made. (all in favor) PETITIONS From Swager Bros., Inc. requesting annexing of certain land to the City of Stillwater in the Joint Powers area on South Greeley Street and abutting on Forest Hills. They had made a request to the Joint Powers for some subsidized housing for this property and they were told to get an engineering study done on the property which they did not do and the matter was dropped. MR. ELLIOTT stated that in any cases where there is private development that wants to use their services they have always come to the Council for permission to provide that service - they think that this is a highly controversial piece of property to develop proper access to - they would not want to do the work - they would rather be in the role of City Engineer - they would be placed in a position of proponent in the sense of a very difficult piece of land to develop and he would rather not be in that position. MR. MAGNUSON stated that the resolution that is attached is a suggesteddone and he felt that there are a couple of things that if the Council wants to get into this, that the Council make no findings of approval of their plans in any way - also if the Council does see fit to do this, that they include with this a small strip about ten feet wide which was left out in a previous legal description. On motion of Councilwoman Avise, seconded by Councilman MacDonald, the Council delayed action on this petition for further study. (all in favor) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council authorized the payment of the bill in the amount of $252.00 to Stillwater Township for the work done on Neal Avenue. (all in favor) (There will be a letter of understanding for maintenance work to be done on the various streets that the City and the Township will take care of) 2. On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council confirmed the re- appointment of Alfred Roepke to the Board of Water Commissioners for a three year term. (all in favor) 3. On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilman MacDonald, the Council rejected the one bid from Thomas Finn Co. for the repair work to be done on the Library Roof. (all in favor) • • • 1 • 1. Stillater Fence 8138 Jody Ave., Stillwater June 16, 1981 NEW BUSINESS. On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilman Peterson, a resolution was introduced "DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF THE BILLS ". AYES -- Councilwomen Avise and Bodlovick, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and NAYS - -None (see resolutions) APPLICATIONS On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilwoman Avise the following Contractor's Licenses were approved: (all in favor) Advance Companies 16567 - 89th Ave. N., Minneapolis, Mn. 55369 General Bakken Construction General 831 County Rd. D., White Bear Lake 55110 Blacktop Driveway Co. Blacktopping 1187 Front Ave., St. Paul 55109 C & B Excavating Excavators 16115 Quality Tr. N., Scandia 55073 Clark Home Improvement, Inc. 55043 General 659 Queenan Ave. N., Lakeland, Frei Construction, Inc. General 12525 - 62nd St. N., Stillwater Langness Woodworking Stillwater General 10752 Stonebridge Tr., Lux Hmes, Inc. Stillwater General. 617 Lake Drive, St. Croix Roofing Co. Roofing 906 East Sixth St., St. Paul 55106 George Siegfried Construction Co. General 11223 - 32nd St. N., Lake Elmo 55042 Fencing BEER PERMITS On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman following Beer and Liquor Permits were approved: Stillwater Jaycees - Lowell Park - Friday, July 24, 1981 - m• Guests of Gerald Beall - Pioneer Park - Saturday. June 20, 2:30 P. M. (also wine and New Renewal Renewal Renewal Renewal Renewal Renewal Renewal New Renewal Renewal Bodlovick, the (all in favor) 5 to 8 P. M. (consume) 1981 - 12:00 Noon to liquor- consume) 431' INDIVIDUALS AND DELEGATIONS MR. KRIESEL brought up the matter of the EMA agreement for the County for the s4,433 - he y ° fr mventeringri to thetagreemente- the nothing Daid have City wouldhvehto document stop the City the expenditures $3 te000 equip squadescue services only. Last year the City spent abou COUNCILWOMAN BODLOVICK asked if there was anything under Item 3 that if they d th is portion of agreement f- he cannot without charging free runs them and MR. and the City will have to pay for those. in theirUcontract with Mr. Cropp they could get thist s agreement for that saying these that he would supply them free and leave him to collect whatever charge he could from the patient - if the City does not get that agreement out of Mr. Cropp, then it City couldsrequirre that C Mr. Cropp for the charges the patient the thouh the patient on a run of that kind. MR. CROPP stated that the County intends to continue to pay the hospital and doctor for the treatment of people taken from the jail, but they want the ambulance run free. COUNCILWOMAN BODLOVICK stated that Mr. Kelly made the statement that it will have to be free if we accept the funds. • • • • 4 32 June 16, 1981 MR. MAGNUSON stated that we are only bound within our contract area - the reason the County pays these funds is to cover charges like these - the $4,433. :a. .:a1L3EL fell Chat this agreement here is nu aid: -6aLiuli to pay Stillwater Ambulance Service anything regardless of how many runs he makes - he is not making a run for the City of Stillwater - there is no d> ligation on our part with this particular agreement it gives the City options as to what we do with the money - we can take the $4,433 and leave it with the City of Stillwater without any agreement between the City of Stillwater and the Stillwater Ambulance Service. MAYOR JUNKER asked if they say 'send an ambulance to the County Courthouse' and Mr. Cropp does not go - then who is liable? MR. KRIESEL stated that Mr. Cropp is liable because he did not send the ambulance. MR. MAGNUSON stated that the City has violated the agreement because we say here that we as the contractor agree to make those emergency runs . . . MR. KRIESEL stated as our Stillwater Rescue Service - only the Stillwater Rescue Squad. MR. MAGNUSON stated that if the City signs this as Contractor that means that whatever services we provide in our contract area including not only our services, but Mr. Cropp's. MR. KRIESEL did not feel that way at all - if the Washington County Sheriff's Depart- ment calls Stillwater Rescue Squad that we would respond and that we would not charge them - this is very similar to what we signed last year - what we have to do is to respond at the request of the Washington County Sheriff's Department for a rescue squad - and another thing that we have to do is document what we spend the money on. MR. CROPP stated that a lot of the money that we are talking about is money that he has generated for the City - of the $300,000 spent in Washington County, he generates $150,000 - the Stillwater Rescue Squad does not generate a nickel - he generates all the money and he is getting it back in rebate and the City is going to take it and spend it. His budget was that in 1980 and this is entered into the County's computer -he gets payback from the State and Federal government based on what was spent and generated locally - the City's rescue squad did not generate any money. He wishes that the City would bill for their services - he makes 600 calls and the Stillwater Rescue Squad goes on ten and he felt that it is extremely unfair to give the rescue squad all of the money and he can't agree with this change, and they trying to squeeze the abmulance out of any of these funds. After some discussion the Council did not make a decision on this matter and they scheduled a special meeting for June 23, 1981 at 6:30 P. M. to consider this matter further and meet with Bob Voto on the audit report. MR. MAGNUSON asked the Council to look at the full agreement packet which breaks down all the ambulance runs in the County and what that contemplates - the money that they have distributed is based on the runs - they do not anticipate that we have our own Rescue Service. CONSULTING ENGINEER'S REPORT 1. MR. ELLIOTT reported to the Council on providing sewer service to George Parker for his building and this would have to be connected to a manhole east of Fourth Street. There would be the matter of restoring the Street and exclusive of this the cost would be $5,000 and the total cost could be about $6,000. It was agreed that this should be an eight inch sewer and that several quotes should be secured for this improvement. 2. On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Avise, a resolution was introduced "AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF ADVISORY SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF THIRD AND MYRTLE STREETS" as recommended by the City Engineer. AYES -- Councilwomen Avise and Bodlovick, Councilmen MacDonald and Peterson and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) 3. MR. ELLIOTT explained the location of Neal Avenue as it relates to the Oak Glen Development and the fact that in about ten years that street will be upgraded - they are proposing a rural section on that portion of Neal Avenue - there is FAU money available for the City and Township as well about $250,000 to $300,000 - he would like to see that a rural section is built abutting the Oak Glen Plat and he can meet with the Township people and see what they have to say and the location of the street. • • r June 16, 1981 ISM POO Ii • GITl COORDINATOR'S REPORT (continued) 1. MR. KRIESEL called the Council's attention to the letter from Washington County regarding the reconstruction of South Third Street from Chestnut to Walnut Street and the Council will meet with the County on this matter in the near future. 2. MR. KRIESEL discussed with the Council the assessment appeals for the Parking Lot on South Main Street and the possible reduction in these assessments. He felt that from an administrative standpoint it would be a lot cleaner if the City could come up with some figure based on projected net revenues over a ten year period for the term of the assessments - to come up with a figure and based on that figure reduce the assessments right now in total rather than do it every year - make a one time adjustment to the assessment roll now - he felt that we should be able to reasonably reduce the assessments by 20 to 25% which would amount to $44,000 to $55,000. MR. MAGNUSON felt that would be a reasonable approach, but what he would like to be able to do is to go to them and say 'will you dismiss your case if we do this' rather than just go ahead and do it right now - he felt that we should get them to agree to this before we do it. He requested that the Council wait until the next regular meeting to take any action on this matter. (Mr. Magnuson was directed to negotiate the 20 -25% figure with these parties) COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS The matter of the Metro Waste meeting to be held on June 25th and reviewal of this information will be taken care of at the June 23rd meeting. QUESTIONS FROM THE PRESS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilwoman Avise, the follow- ing minutes were approved as corrected: (all in favor) Ma 19, 1981 Regular Meeting 5:00 P. M. May 19, 1981 Recessed Meeting 7:30 P. M. June 2, 1981 Regular Meeting 7:30 P. M. , - ( *correction on page 10 a typo - change - should read "10" instead "20' middle of the page) ORDINANCES None RESOLUTIONS -The following resolutions were read and on roll call were adopted: 1. Directing the Payment of the Bills 2. Approving the Modification in the Firefighter's Relief Association By -Laws (Councilwoman Bodlovick opposed) 3. Industrial Revenue Bonds for River Valley Professional Project 4. Advisory Signs for Third and Myrtle ADJOURNMENT On motion of Councilman Peterson, seconded by Councilman MacDonald the meeting adjourned at 9:15 P. M. Attest :.XI.� - -1-./ - City Clerk Mayor 433 • • •