Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-04-15 CC MIN• • • 0 • COUNCIL CHAMBER Stillwater, Minnesota REGULAR MEETING The meeting was called to order by Mauor Junker. Present: Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker Absent: Councilman R. Peterson Also Present: Finance Director /Coordinator, Kriesel; City Attorney, Magnuson; City Clerk, Schnell; Public Safety Director, Abrahamson; Superintendent of Public Works, Shelton; Fire Chief, Chial; Building Official, Zepper; Director of Parks & Recreation, Blekum; Consulting Engineer, Moore and Freesman Press: St. Paul Dispatch, Jim Broede Citizens: None PUBLIC WORKS 1. Mr. Shelton reported to the Council regarding the utility poles on the Bruce property and he did not feel that the City should get involved in this - he further felt that this is possibly a private driveway and this road has been there at least since 1959 - NSP costs for the moving of the pole is $450 and for the telephone company to move their cable and put it back on the pole would be about $600, so the total cost is about $1,000 and there is no way the guy -wires can be moved. (It was decided that it would just not be feasible to do this.) PUBLIC SAFETY No report FIRE CHIEF No report COMMITTEE REPORTS April 15, 1980 4:00 P. M. PARKS & RECREATION 1. Mr. Blekum informed the Council that he has the opportunity to get four CETA people to help with the refurbishing of Pioneer Park without cost to the City and he felt that the project stands a better chance of getting done instead of relying completely on volunteers for three months. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council instructed Mr. Blekum to hire the four CETA people for the work at Pioneer Park. (all in favor) BUILDING OFFICIAL 1. Mr. Zepper informed the Council that there is a party coming in this evening regarding a fence and he is receiving many calls on fences and he has talked to Mr. Magnuson about changing the present ordinance somewhat - MR. MAGNUSON cited some of the changes - that the height limit be six feet without a variance and this would be in the back of the front line of the house either in the back or the side of the house - finished side of the fence shall face the abutting property owner - 42 inches in height on corner lots would be the limit to the front of the house - privacy fences to be one foot from the property line so that they can be maintained or other types can be put on the property line. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the City Attorney made the first reading by title of an ordinance entitled 'AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 31 ZONING, SECTION 31.02. REGULATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION, PLACEMENT, HEIGHT, NATURE AND EXTENT OF FENCES. (all in favor) 2. MR. ZEPPER informed the Council that the City of Stillwater has issued over $600,000 in permits already this year and the largest one was about $40,000. 3. MR. ZEPPER requested a Micro -Wave Oven for the employees and the Mayor stated that they will have to check the budget to see if there is money available for this time. • • • ( 102 April 15, 1980 CONSULTING ENGINEER (Dick Moore) 1. MR. MOORE DISTRIBUTED COPIES OF THE I/I Study which was done in the Downtown area. He reviewed the various sections of the report with the Council - the field work was done by Mr. Shelton and Mr. Freesman. Mr. Elliott's recommendation was to ask these businesses to correct these problems and that is the context of the whole report - give them sixty days to correct the matter or to pay the increased cost of treating this sewage. Questions were raised as to whether or not storm sewers were available to everyone of these businesses and Mr. Moore stated not to everyone, but to the largest users it is. MAYOR JUNKER asked if they could possibly in some instances pump it under the sidewalk and into the storm sewer and Mr. Moore stated that such a storm sewer is available to the Lowell Inn who is the greatest violator according to this report. COUNCILMAN HARRY PETERSON felt that this was a City problem in the cases of the springs put there by "Mother Nature" and he asked what the cost would be for each individual to connect up to the storm sewer. MAYOR JUNKER felt that we should take some of the sewer money which was returned to us and help these people with these costs for a system that would get it out - otherwise, the city would be paying the treatment costs year after year. COUNCILMAN POWELL felt that we would be taking the money from everybody and you are helping a few; if you use it to pay for something that everybody benefits 14 from, then he could see it. MAYOR JUNKER felt that the situation is unique with the springs that we have in B ' this City and that the City should be able to spend a little money to help them out. MR. MOORE stated that Main Street does not have a storm sewer but the other streets do have. The storm sewers are designed to take the drainage from these areas either by surface or by directly into the storm sewers itself - when most of these buildings were constructed there were combined sewers in the same pipe so it was common practice to run the roof leaders into that combined pipe - now that the system is separated it is vailable for them to run roof drains into the storm sewers. COUNCILMAN POWELL stated that in 1973 these people were notified to do this and some of them did comply. MR. SHELTON stated that some of those that did this in 1973 have created a problem in Water Street during the winter months where there are not pipes available. MAYOR JUNKER felt that taking the money from the refund would be a benefit to the whole City since it will eliminate the over $23,000 which the City is currently paying for this flow. MR. MOORE stated that there is no way to eliminate roof - leader problems on Main Street and Water Street, but there are other areas that would be possible to put into the storm sewers. There were questions raised about those who did not comply in 1973 and as to whether or not there was an ordinance at that time and it was concluded that there was an ordinance which is now City Code No. 20.05, and the City Attorney cited the contents of this section. MAYOR JUNKER asked if specs could be drawn as to what these costs would be to do all of these and there were further questions raised about using these funds for this purpose - get a contractor that does this work and present it to these people and offer them an option of doing it or not. MR. KRIESEL raised the question as to whether or not this could be assessed and MR. MAGNUSON stated that could be done like what is done on the Diseased Elm - give them an opportunity and if they do not do it, then the City could do it and assess them. MR. MOORE stated that the problem in getting estimates to do this work is basically that all of this is on private property and the City really can't go in and do that, so the individuals would gave to present the City with the estimates. COUNCILMAN POWELL felt that the SAC refund money should be used for the infiltration which is going into the sanitary sewer directly from the springs and he felt that this is where it would do the most good. This would be a larger project and we would possibly receive monies from the Federal and State and then this money could be used for the City's share. IMP s e e 0 • • • 1 1 hi/ April 15, 1980 MR. FREESMAN stated that if the downtown sewers are leaking then this water is going into the sanitary system and if this is eliminated, then this ground water has no where to go and it will go more and more into the foundations and the basements - the existing sanitary system is taking a lot of the ground water now and if that is plugged up, the water table is going to rise and there will be more water in the basements - and if the water in the basements is not taken out of the sanitary system, the City is going to end up putting it back in by build- ing a new sanitary system and not taking care of it. MR. MAGNUSON stated that the City has the statutory power to do the work on private property if it is a problem and the only requirement is that we give them the opportunity to do the work first and if they do not do it within thirty days then we do the work - if we have the power to assess, we have the power to do this work. MR. MOORE AND MR. SHELTON agreed that that largest contributors do have the storm sewers available and they felt that this would be the cheapest way for them to go since the user charge is most likely to increase. MAYOR JUNKER felt that MR. Shelton could make a trip to each of the contributors and explain to them just what it is - what is the cost involved and come to an agreement with them and Mr. Shelton felt that he could take care of that - he will show the report to them and explain the problems involved. 2. MR. MOORE distribbted to the Council the bid tabulation for Local Improvement No. 166 for the Downtown Parking Lot on Main Street. Mr. Shelton, Miss Schnell and Mr. Freesman opened the following bids at 11:00 A. M. on April 10, 1980. The advertisement for bids was published in the Construction Bulletin on March 21, 28 and April 4, 1980 and in the Stillwater Gazette, the official newspaper of the City, on March 18 and 25, 1980 and April 1, 1980. Bid No. 1 Moelter Construction Co. Stillwater, Minnesota Bid Bond Section 1 Bid Section 2 Bid Bid No. 2 APM Asphalt Paving Minnetonka, Minnesota Bid Bond Section 1 Bid Section 2 Bid Bid No. 3 Jay Bros. Arden Hills, Mn. Bid Bond Section 1 Bid Section 2 Bid Bid No. 4 Bituminous Consultant Minneapolis, Mn. Bid No. 5 Hoffman Electric St. Paul, Minnesota Bid No. 6 LPD Electric Lake Elmo Bid Bond Section 1 Bid Section 2 Bid $ 76,575.25 12,301.25 $ 65,685.00 None $ 69,773.00 None $ 58,583.00 None Bid Bond Section 1 Bid -0- Section 2 Bid $ 14,052.90 Bid Bond Section 1 Bid - 0 - Section 2 Bid $ 11,829.00 There was discussion about the estimates for this project and what was included in the completed job. The bids stipulated that the Council has sixty days time to award the contract which was due to the sale of the bonds for this project. 103 e • • • • • !104 April 15, 1980 COUNCILMAN POWELL made a motion to award the bid to Bituminous Consultant and LPD Electric contingent on the sale of the bonds or the Bonding Consultant approving it and after some discussion the motion was withdrawn which was the recommendation of the Consulting Engineer not to award the bid at this time. MR. MAGNUSON recommended that the City wait until the Bill is signed before they contact the Bonding Consultant and Mr. Kriesel stated that he had been in contact with Mr. Langness and he felt that there would be a rush on the market and that the City would not obtain as good a rate at this time. (Action will be taken at the next meeting). 3. MR. MOORE reviewed with the Council the road by Ogrens and he met with the County and the placement that they have come up witll satisfy Mr. Ogren. When they put the stakes in the ground, Mr. Ogren insisted that he would have to have five more feet and they are now in the process of moving the entire roadway up another five feet and that will shorten the area at another point and Mr. Ogren stated to Mr. Van Wormer that this would be the absolute last demand that he would make - the engineers have to re- design it and draw up the easement again - his total concern seems to be stacking room for traffic and he feels that it would cost too much to move the pumpline. MR. MAGNUSON stated that when Mr. Kirchner is appraising the parcel here and that when he is appraising a parcel that this would be a total taking because of the setback - he takes into account the reasonable likelihood of getting a variance and he knows from his dealings and there was discussion about possible damages on portions of this property, and what the other alternatives are. There was discussion about the placement of this road and how it could be utilized with servicing of the Townhouses which are proposed to be built on a portion of the Feely property, and other traffic patterns in the area and getting to these various businesses located in the Industrial Park. The Council was agreeable to giving him the five feet with the stipulation that there will be no damages on these other properties and Mr. Magnuson stated that the City will get a deed from him and whomever he sells it to in the future will be buying what he is buying and the City would get involved in that. 4. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, a resolution was introduced "ORDERING THE FINAL PLANS FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 178 - Tower Drive and Curvecrest Drive ". Ayes -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS- -None (see resolutions) 5. Mr. Moore explained the Change Order No. for the Frontage Road which was brought up at the last meeting - the contractor tried to move the two trees in question on the Bell property and he had contracted two or three different people to do this work and none of them had equipment large enough to move these trees and the net result that it was cheaper to buy two new trees and that was satisfactory with the Bells. 6. Mr. Moore stated that he talked to Norris Swager on the Pine Tree drainage problem and he wanted to look into doing the work himself and the Council agreed that would be satisfactory at a previous meeting. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council directed that the City Attorney send Mr. Swager a letter reminding him of this and make sure that the work is finished and is inspected and that he should be given a lime limit of thirty days. (all in favor) COUNCIL REOUEST ITEM (out of order) COUNCILMAN POWELL inquired if it would be possible to have a patrolman on duty at a little before 8:00 A. M. in the downtown area at the intersection of Main and Chestnut and also that the Downtown Council is concerned about parking tickets and they are going to propose a solution to that by having a warning ticket when they are in vitiation and then a half hour later, the officer will go back and if they have not put the money in, then they are given a ticket. He would like to see a patrolman at the intersection of Main and Chestnut during busy hours and this was prompted by the fact that he almost got hit on this corner. MAYOR JUNKER stated that he had talked to Officer Beberg and he stated that he would be willing to spend an hour there in the morning and his shift would be changed to 7:30 A. M. to 3:30 P. M., and Mr. Abrahamson was in agreement with this. Also they will park a patrol car in this area which is visible when they come across the bridge. rq lki I e) rl • e 0 to • t 1 P • • April 15, 1980 • CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report CITY COORDINATOR'S REPORT 1. Mr. Kriesel asked that the Council meet with him regarding the Development Agreement for the Nelson School and the Purchase Agreement and it was agreed that they would meet at 6:30 P. M., April 29, 1980 on this matter. 2. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, a resolution was introduced "EXECUTING THE AGREEMENT WITH SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC., ST. PAUL FOR THE ENGINEERING FOR THE INFILTRATION /INFLOW ANALYSIS STUDY FOR THE CITY OF STILLWATER". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) 3. On motion of Councilwoman Bodlovick, seconded by Councilman Harry Peterson, a resolution was introduced "AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF STILLWATER FOR THE FUNDING OF THE I/I STUDY ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) 4. Mr. Kriesel presented to the Council a memo for charges for dumping into the sanitary sewer lines and that the haulers obtain a permit and that a fee be charged for such dumpings and there would be a chain a lock on the manhole where they will be duping by the Aiple property. Mr. Magnuson cited what is in the Code on this matter and there is a permit fee in the Code and it was concurred that it should be a fee of $5.00 per load. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council set the permit at $25.00 per year and plus $5.00 per load for dumping into our sewer system. (all in favor) (Someone from the Public Works is to check the manhole to make sure that it is not left open for unlicensed haulers to dump into this manhole.) COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS (continued) 2. COUNCILMAN HARRY PETERSON inquired as to what kind of ordinances are there for cleaning up of property within the City of Stillwater and he made reference to several filling stations which have been closed up and there are abandoned signs and pumps. MR. MAGNUSON stated that we have Chapter 38 of the Code which is the Nuisance Ordinance and Mr. Conley has been issuing warning tickets, and they are followed up. COUNCILMAN HARRY PETERSON also made reference to the old shed on the Aiple property and that it should either be torn down or painted - it is what the people see when they first come to Stillwater and MR. MAGNUSON stated that there is a special statute on such matters. 3. MR. MAGNUSON made reference to the Code Chapter relating to dogs and under this Code there is a $100 fine for having a dog running at large and Judge Sandeen has suggested that the City of Stillwater change their ordinance to read as many of the other Washington County communities have it as a misdemeanor and the violators can be put in ,jail for up to ninety days after a second or third offense. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council instructed the City Attorney to amend the Ordinance to make it a misdemeanor to allow a dog to run at large. (all in favor) Mr. Abrahamson stated that they are bringing a lot of dogs to Afton that are unlicensed. THE MEETING RECESSED AT 6:05 P. M. UNTIL 7:30 P. M. 0 J • s • i s • 16 Mayor Junker reconvened the meeting at 7:30 P. M. The Invocation was given by the City Clerk. Present: Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker. Absent: None Also Present: Finance Director - Coordinator, Kriesel; City Clerk, Schnell; City Attorney, Magnuson; Consulting Engineer, Moore; Planning Commission, Tom Farrell Press: Citzens: None Free Press - Jones Stillwater Gazette, Liberty Norman Webb, Jack Safer, Mr. & Mrs. John Nash, Mrs. L. K. Anderson INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS None at this point in the meeting. PETITIONS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. This was the day and time for the public hearing for Case No. 378 for Val Finneman, 715 South Sixth Street for a Special Use Permit for a pole type garage. Notice of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Evening Gazette, the official newspaper of the City on April 3, 1980 and copies were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet. The Mayor opened the hearing. MRS. L. K. ANDERSON, 719 South Sixth Street, stated that she did not like the idea of a pole garage being erected since she lives next door to this property. NORMAN WEBB, 712 South Fifth Street, a neighbor directly east and he has the same feeling as Mrs. Anderson - they went through a great deal of trouble and time to try to renovate the property up there - the former owners and himself cleared out the things and other things so that they could have some air moving through there and now he (Mr. Finneman) is proposing a forty foot garage and just block the whole thing up - he does not want to look at the back end of a forty foot pole barn. TOM FARRELL, Chairman of the Planning Commission stated that they unanimously denied it for a number of reasons - one was the size, they questioned the con- struction type and also there was some question as to the use of such a large facility - the rumor was that this man and another man were considering doing some type of automotive repair work and there were questions as to whether the driveway was actually on his property - there were a lot of questions in the whole thing and they denied it. MR. FINNEMAN did not appear at this hearing The Mayor closed the hearing On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Council followed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and denied the Special Use Permit request from Val Fineman, 715 South Sixth Street for a pole type garage. (all in favor) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. MR. MAGNUSON explained the preliminary plat for the Gould Plat and the location of the road. MR. MOORE stated that apparently Mr. Gould has hired a contractor and asked them to construct a road into the area - they have not seen any design on the roadway at all and Mr. Elliott has told Schifsky that the engineers should see a plan. 0 • s • • • • 4 At • • • • b bat April 15, 1980 Questions were asked about the various provisions in the motion approving the preliminary plan and MR. MAGNUSON did not know if the Planning Commission had seen the plat and one of the provisions was that the development of the road be paid for by the developer - that the road be built to seven ton axel load with rolled bituminous curb and gutter and that the design of the street be approved by the City Engineer. MR. MAGNUSON indicated there was no park dedication on the plat either. On motion of Councilman Roger Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the City Coordinator was directed to send a letter to Mr. Gould to inform him that the City expects him to comply with the provisions as set forth in the preliminary plat approval, one of which was that any road design be approved by the City Engineer; and also mention should be made regarding park dedication for this plat, and that this will be taken up at the next regular meeting. (all in favor) INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS 1. MR. JOHN NASH, 2308 Driftwood Lane, appeared before the Council regarding the putting of a fence on his lot line instead of three feet from the lot line - this would be a six foot high privacy fence which would be down the side of his house and across the back. He is also constructing a swimming pool in his back- yard. MR. MAGNUSON explained the proposed changes in the Fence Ordinance - it would allow a six foot high fence without a permit - with a privacy fence it would be one foot from the line so that the owner can get on the other side to maintain it. He stated that the Council could issue a variance from the present ordinance - with the present ordinance he can build three feet from the property line and the fence can be only four feet high Questions were raised about granting this variance without it first going to the Planning Commission and MR. MAGNUSON stated that this would be a variance for two weeks - if he waited until the next meeting he could built it without coming to the Council. If it is more than six feet high, then the Building Code applies. There was discussion about the neighbors being aware of this fence and this could be done with the public hearing as all of the problems in the past have been with the neighbors on fences. MR. MAGNUSON stated that if we have the second reading of the ordinance at the next Council meeting, then there would oe a need for the public hearing and also there is a provision in the ordinance that the Council can hear variances and grant them without any notice of hearing if they find that the substantial rights of others are not involved. He questioned if this was the safe thing to do or not - after the new ordinance is enacted this will be allowed in any event. MAYOR JUNKER requested that Mr. Nash come back at the May 6th meeting for the second reading of the ordinance and if it is passed, then he put up his fence and he was willing to wait. 2. JACK SAFAR appeared before the City Council regarding the easements for the Hi- Rise for the Elderly as it relates to the retaining wall and MR. MAGNUSON stated that they are 11 in order and they formalize what has already been given and what they really do is to satisfy one of the lawyers at the Attorney General's Office - they comply with the as -built situation and this would be a little more definite than what was done before. He recommended that the Council execute these permits and vacations. On motion of Councilman Roger Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, that subject to the approval of the City Attorney, that the requests from Dominium Corporation be ..pproved. (all in favor) On motion of Councilnan Roger Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, a resolution was introduced "VACATING A PORTION OF MULBERRY STREET ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) NEW BUSINESS 1. On motion of Councilman R. Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, a resolution was introduced "ESTABLISHING JOINT CITIZEN ADVISORY ADVISORYBODY:. AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) 10 • • • • • a E • '108 April 15, 1980 2. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilman R. Peterson, a beer permit was granted to St. Michael's Church for Sunday, 'une 22, 1980 from Noon to 6:00 P. M. on their grounds for a Festival. (all in favor) 3. On motion of Councilman H. Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, a resolution was introduced "DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF THE FILLS ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) Mr. Kriesel made mention of the two easement payments which were included on this resolution which had been approved earlier. APPLICATIONS On motion of Councilman Harry Peterson, seconded by Councilman Roger Peterson, the following Contractor's Licenses were approved: (all in favor) COMMUNICATIONS None CITY COORDINATOR'S REPORT (continued) 5. On motion of Councilman Harry Peterson, seconded by Councilman Roger Peterson, a resolution was introduced EMPLOYING TIMOTHY KLENK AS A PART -TIME POLICE OFFICER COMNCING APRIL 16, 1980 ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen l son, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) 6. On motion of Councilman Harry Peterson, seconded by Councilman R. Peterson, a resolution was introduced "EMPLOYING GREGORY TUENGE AND SAMMY MC KAY AS MEMBERS OF THE STILLWATER POLICE RESERVES ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS- -None (see resolutions) 7. On motion of a resolution was n introduced r "APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT by APPOINTMENT OF JEFFREY B JUNKER e AS SEWER MAINTENANCE MAN ". AYES -- Councilwoman Bodlovick, Councilmen H. Peterson, R. Peterson, Powell and Mayor Junker NAYS - -None (see resolutions) H. 8. Coordinat rfwas Councilman directed post Peterson, .Teff seconded Junker's onlasnJuniorPeterson, City Sewer Main - tenance Man. (all in favor) 9. On motion of Councilman H. Peterson, seconded by Councilman R. Peterson, the matter of approving the By -Laws for the Fire Relief Association be laid over until the next regular meeting. (all in favor) Affirmative Contractors New 500 Bear Avenue South, Vadnais Heights 55110 General Hoyt Construction Co. 150 West 88th St., Bloomington 55420 General New Midway Sign Co. Sign Erection New Y4 444 Prior Avenue North, St. Paul 55104 B 81 Nordquist Sign Co. Si Erection New 312 West Lake Street, Minneapolis 55408 B Ken Rydeen Roofing New R. #2, Somerset, Wisconsin 54025 B St. Croix Pools General Renewal 13481 - 60th St. N., Stillwater - - -On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilman Roger Peterson, a Cigarette License was approved for the Stillwater Country Club, North Fourth Street, Stillwater for six months for 1980. (all in favor) el • • • • • p • • - r 7 I fA lee • 100 10. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the Finance Director was authorized to distribute the EMS Funds within one or two days of their receipt as previously set up. (all in favor) COMMITTEE REPORTS (continued) PUBLIC WORKS 1. Mr. Shelton reported that everything has been inspected on the North Second Street and Olive Street Parking Lot repairs from last year - what he had listed and approved up to this date was $113,319.01 - some of the items are under and some are over but as long as the scope of the work or the materials and it is ready for the audited and the City should get the rest of this money. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 1. On motion of Councilman Roger Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the AN ORDINANCE AMENDING STILLWATER SECTIONd33.03, SUED. entitle d of an (all in favor) 2. On motion of Councilman R. Peterson, seconded by Councilwoman Bodlovick, the City Attorney made the first reading by title of an ordinance entitled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING STILLWATER CITY CODE, CHAPTER 30, SECTION 30.02, RUBBISH DEPOSIT SYSTEM ". (all in favor) 3. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilman Roger Peterson, the City Attorney made the first reading by title of an ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND STILLWATER CITY CODE, SECTION 33.01, SUBDIVISION 7, OF CHAPTER 33, BUILDING CODE ". (all in favor) 4. On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilman R. Peterson, the City TO • AMEND the title of an ordinance 07, SUBDIVISION 4, ORDINANCE DISPOSAL O LIQUID WASTE INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM ". (The change would be that the users would be billed monthly for each load dumped rather than have them pick up a permit for each load as dumped) 5. On motion of Councilman Roger Peterson, seconeed by Councilmen Powell, the City Attorney made the first reading by title of an ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 52 -A, "AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF GAMBLING ". (all in favor) (Mr. Magnuson stated that if a municipality does not establish this ordinance then it is prohibitive to allow such gambling since the enactment of the new state law). 6. Mr. Magnuson reported that the Johnson Annexation will be heard on Friday, April 18th. COUNCIL REOUEST ITEMS None April 15, 1980 QUESTIONS FROM PRESS REPRESENTATIVES None ORDINANCES *First Readings - Amending the Fence - Amending City Code, - Amending City Code - Amending City Code - Amending City Code - Amending City Code *Number of some of these were Ordinance Chapter 33, Section 33.03 -Ord. No. 582 Chapter 30, Section 30.03 - Ord. No. 583 Chapter 33 - Ordinance No. 584 Section 29.07 - Disposal of Liquid Waste Section 52 -A - Gambling - Ord. No. 585 changed at the time of the second reading 109` • • • • • 7 • 110 April. 15, 1980 RESOLUTIONS The following resolutions were read and on roll call were unanimously adopted: 1. Directing the Payment of the Bills. 2. Ordering the Final Plans for Tower Drive and Cruvecrest - Local Improvement No. 178 3. Sign Agreement for Grant for I/I Study with Engineers 4. Sign the Agreement with the Metro Waste for Grant for the I/I Study 5. Cable Advisory Body 6. Employ Police Reserves - McKay and Tuenge 7. Jeff Junker appointed as Sewer Maintenance Man 8. Vacation of Mulberry Street 9. Employ Part -Time Police Officer - Klenk Adjournment On motion of Councilman Powell, seconded by Councilman R. Peterson, the meeting adjourned at 8:25 P. M. Attest: ull 1e ,4 Cit9 Clerk Mayor 7 re wv ■ • • • • 1 1