Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-02-01 HPC PacketThe meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, February 1, 2010, in the Training Room, 1 Floor of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF January 4, 2010 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or Tess 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR /10 -03. Design review of signage for the City Parking Ramp located at 200 2nd St No in the CBD, Central Business District. City of Stillwater, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Retreat Discussion 7.02 CLG Grant 8. ADJOURN St a A C E OF M i N N E 5 O 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, February 1, 2010 AGENDA City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission January 4, 2010 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Micky Cook, Robert Goodman, Jeff Johnson, Roger Tomten, Scott Zahren Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Johnson, moved to approve the minutes of Dec. 7, 2009. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DEM /10 -01 A demolition request for a detached single -car garage at 510 Olive St. W. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Douglas and Kelly Marthaler, applicants. Mr. Marthaler addressed the Commission, stating that he thought their plans will add to the view of the property as the existing garage is quite an "eyesore." He said the new garage will match the style of the main house. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Lieberman noted that the nine steps required for the issuance of a demolition permit have been completed. On a question from Mr. Johnson, the applicant stated there has been no interest expressed in response to advertisements for the sale of the existing garage. Mr. Johnson pointed out the existing garage is not of the same vintage as the main structure, and moved to approve the demolition request as submitted with the replacement structure as outlined in the submitted plans. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DEM /DR/10 -02 A demolition request for a 1 -1/2 story residence and single -car garage and to consider a request for review of a new residence in compliance with the Neighborhood Conservation District (RB, Two Family Residential District) requirements located at 1220 Fourth Ave. S. Terry O'Brien, applicant. Mr. O'Brien was present. Mr. Lieberman acknowledged the completeness of the O'Briens' application packet. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. Peter Hovland, 1222 Fourth Ave. S., spoke in support of the plans and said he thought the plans would result in a great improvement to the neighborhood. The resident of 1215 Fourth Ave. S. also spoke in support of the proposal and said he thought the new home would fit in nicely with the neighborhood. No other comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Lieberman said based on his own observations and comments provided in the letter from Don Empson, it seems clear that once was salvageable and a piece of the City's history has been lost. However, Mr. Lieberman said he would like to see whatever can be saved of the original structure utilized to the extent possible. Mr. O'Brien said they are hoping to utilize some of the original rafter or floor joists for table tops or similar uses; he said it would be hard to know what might be usable until they begin the process of taking the original structure apart. Mr. Johnson noted that in the spring this house often sits in the water so the site has been not friendly to preserving the house due to the nature of the grading in the area; he also noted there have been a lot of alterations to the original structure. Mr. Lieberman moved to approve the demolition permit. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission January 4, 2010 Regarding the design review of the new structure, Mr. O'Brien explained the new structure would be a single family residence, with primary living area and master bedroom on the main floor and a two -car detached garage to reduce the mass of the house. He said they anticipate the need to remove only two trees. He said they look forward to living in the neighborhood. He said the house was designed by a South Carolina architectural firm, with some modifications required for the Minnesota climate; he said they would remove the rear porch shown on the southwest corner, would add atrium doors on the dining room south side, would have a full basement, and would not have an external chimney. He also noted some adjustment to the roof pitch may be necessary for snow loads. He also stated there may be some small window additions from what is shown in the plans. Mr. Johnson asked about siding and trim materials; Mr. O'Brien said they would utilize hardi -plank siding, with the perimeter likely trimmed with limestone. Mr. Tomten said he thought plans do a good job of pulling together an architectural vernacular from old Stillwater. Mr. Johnson said he thought the level of detail such as the frieze boards beneath the windows is what helps the plans along. On a question by Mr. Johnson, Mr. O'Brien said the garage will be of similar proportions /materials as the main structure. Mr. Johnson suggested that the applicant be very careful of the grading due to previous drainage issues. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the plans as submitted. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion. Mr. Johnson reminded the applicant to submit modifications to Mr. Pogge. Motion passed unanimously. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/09 -02 Design review of signage for building located at 228 Chestnut St. E. (Dairy Queen) in the CBD, Central Business District. Wally Schoumaker, applicant. The applicant was present. Mr. Lieberman reviewed the request for a wall sign on the Chestnut Street side of the building for second floor tenants. It was noted there is an existing projecting sign on the Chestnut Street elevation, which the applicant would like to keep. Mr. Schoumaker provided photos of the building before it was purchased by the current owner and an enlargement of what the proposed sign would look like on the building. Mr. Tomten asked about the total allowable signage space for the building, noting that this proposal would still result in the total signage being under the maximum allowable square footage. Mr. Tomten said he likes to consider a ratio of 40% of a sign as background, while this design appears to be more background than lettering; he suggested the design as proposed might be difficult to read. Mr. Tomten said he likes the proportion of the proposed sign but would look at ways to beef up the font. Mr. Lieberman said in terms of the possible setting of precedence, he was not troubled because there are two very distinct uses in this building Dairy Queen with its distinctive signage and the second -floor tenant usage; because of the two distinctive uses, he suggested, it doesn't make sense to have one sign package for the entire building. Mr. Johnson said the proposed sign fits the intent of a sign package for professional tenants with changeable tenant listing, and he noted this does provide identification for the entrance for the second -floor tenants. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the signage as submitted, with reference to the fact that the Main Street stair entrance for the second floor will have signage incorporated into the glass area of the door only and be unlit. Mr. Schoumaker asked if lighting would be allowed for the sign on the Chestnut Street elevation in the future; it was noted that request would have to come back before the Heritage Preservation Commission with details as to the type of fixture, etc. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion. Ms. Cook asked about the material of the sign; Mr. Schoumaker explained the sign would be made of materials to withstand the elements. Motion to approve as conditioned passed unanimously. 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission January 4, 2010 NEW BUSINESS Mr. Pogge told the Commission the City has received the grant for $4,260 for the Hersey Bean project. He asked for a volunteer to meet with the consultant in developing plans for the stabilization of the wall. Mr. Lieberman referred to a letter from the Historical Society regarding some available grants. Mr. Pogge said the City would be applying for the grant in question again this year and apply for a state grant as the City match for the federal funding. Mr. Pogge provided a possible design for the parking ramp signage. The preliminary design provides for a sign of about 18 square feet, which he said staff would argue fits the mass of the building. He also noted the existing brackets are 3' apart which would require some modification if a smaller sign is utilized. Ms. Cook asked about the colors. Mr. Pogge stated the green is the color utilized in other City parking areas; he said he was unsure as to the reasoning for the use of red. Mr. Pogge said the intent would be to utilize the City logo and have the green extended. Mr. Johnson asked to look at the design of other City parking signage as compared to this proposal; Mr. Pogge provided the sample of the design as requested. During discussion at the table, members indicated that the use of directional signage would make the parking ramp sign redundant. Mr. Pogge stated the parking ramp consultant believes visible signage is a critical element, and he noted that especially for visitors, the signage on the ramp is important. Mr. Johnson said he believes the most important sign would be the one on Commercial and Main directing people to the ramp, and he noted the proposed building sign is of no value to folks on Main or those coming from north on Second. Mr. Pogge noted that all the parking signage would be revised before spring. In discussion, it was suggested that directional signage accomplishes getting folks to the ramp and the projecting signage on the ramp is after the fact. Mr. Pogge said the proposal follows the sign package prepared by the City's parking ramp consultants. Mr. Tomten questioned redesigning a whole new parking program for this building and said he thought the program in place is working and people understand the "P." Mr. Johnson noted the size of the projecting sign doesn't meet the City ordinance and said he did not see the justification for it; he said he could see a larger sign off Main Street at Commercial and some advance signage on Main Street. Mr. Pogge said he would pass the comments along. Ms. Cook asked about scheduling a retreat as discussed at the previous meeting. Mr. Pogge said Community Development Director Turnblad had suggested possibly scheduling a joint workshop meeting with the City Council prior to a Commission retreat, getting the Council in the loop prior to the HPC setting any directions for itself. Mr. Lieberman suggested that the Commission ought to get together as a group to discuss its feelings on issues first or it would not be a very useful partner in a dialogue with the Council. Mr. Johnson said he thought the idea of an informal retreat would be to get some ideas to put forth to the Council for input. Ms. Cook said she would be happy to bring the issue of a retreat before the Council and let the Council know this is something the Commission would like to do. On a question by Mr. Goodman, it was noted that a retreat would require publication and other requirements of the Open Meeting law. There was discussion of possible retreat topics demolition, signage, jurisdiction of the HPC, what other communities are doing in the area of preservation, enforcement, expansion of infill guidelines, exterior lighting. Mr. Zahren suggested having a third -party moderator for the retreat; Mr. Tomten and Ms. Cook said they envisioned more of a free flowing 3 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission January 4, 2010 exchange of ideas, and Mr. Lieberman noted there is no budget for a facilitator. There was discussion of possible times; it was consensus that a Sunday afternoon would work for members. In further discussion, it was suggested that two sessions might be required one to prioritize topics and a second to more fully discuss the prioritized topics. Mr. Tomten suggested the retreat discussion might be used to set a yearly work plan to address the topics. Mr. Pogge noted that staff resources must be considered. Mr. Lieberman spoke of the HPC's mission of maintaining the historical integrity of the City. Mr. Johnson asked about the vacancy on Commission. Mr. Pogge stated the vacancy is being advertised. There was discussion of people who might be interested in serving. Mr. Zahren, seconded by Mr. Goodman, moved to adjourn at 9 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 4 $i llwaer 1 1 I N T N► L A I I. OF M I LA N F S. 0 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: January 28, 2010 APPLICANT: Stillwater Parking Commission PROPERTY OWNER: City of Stillwater CASE NO.: 10 -03 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for the Stillwater Parking Ramp LOCATION: 200 21,d St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC Community Commercial ZONING: CBD Central Business District HPC DATE: February 1, 2010 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for the Stillwater Parking Ramp at 200 21,d St N. The proposed sign face is 3'2 -3/4" wide by 6 feet tall for a total of 19.375 square feet. The sign is proposed to contain the circular parking lot "P" logo with the words Public Parking in the lower part of the circle. Above the parking logo will be the Stillwater Logo and a metal arch. The sign is proposed to be unlit. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The proposed sign is larger than what the code allows. 200 2nd St N Page 2 City staff has presented various projecting sign proposals to the HPC in December 2009 and January 2010. Comments from the two HPC meetings were relayed to the Parking Commission during the Parking Commission's January 14, 2010 meeting. At that meeting, the Parking Commission discussed the HPC concerns. The Parking Commission felt that where most downtown businesses have 24 to 26 foot wide store fronts the ramp is a different scale being about 200 feet wide and 4 levels tall. Additionally, the Parking Commission felt that projecting signs on Main Street are intended for pedestrians where the signage on the ramp is intended to inform motorists. The Parking Commission believes a 20 square foot sign is justified in this situation. Finally, the Parking Commission has worked hard to establish a recognizable image in its parking lot signage. Therefore, the Commission requested staff to forward a formal design permit request to the HPC for consideration. A member of the Parking Commission will be at the February 1St meeting to discuss the sign with the HPC. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the request. 2. Deny the request. 3. Continue the request for more information. RECOMMENDATION Review and take an action CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. The bottom of the project must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk. 3. No additional signage. 4. The projection sign be reduced to be no more than six square feet or secure a variance from the Planning Commission to allow the sign area to exceed the allowable square footage. If the sign is reduced in size the new sign design shall be reviewed by City Staff before installation. attachments: Drawing /photo of the proposed sign i NON ILLUMINATED DOUBLE SIDED BLADE SIGN ATTACHED TO WALL PAINTED FLAT CUT OUT ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH ALUMINUM SUPPORT BACKERS SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR MOUNTING SIGN TO WALL IS MADE FROM 4" X 4" SQUARE TUBES THAT SLIP ONTO EXISTING MOUNTS EXISTING MOUNTS ARE 3" X 3" SQUARE TUBES EXTENDING 1' -0" FROM WALL MOUNT EXTENSIONS ARE SPACED 3' -0" APART ON CENTER IN WALL PAGE 1 9 WALL 1' -0 1 '/2 FLAT CUT OUT PAINTED RED ALUMINUM LETTERS MOUNTED ONTO SOLID WHITE ALUMINUM BACKER 3' -2 3/4" 4' -0 FLAT CUT OUT PAINTED GOLD ALUMINUM LETTERS MOUNTED ONTO ALUMINUM BACKER WELDED STEEL BRACKET SYSTEM 0 PAINTED ALUMINUM SIGN STRUCTURE 0' -6 0' -4 1/2 FLAT CUT OUT PAINTED WHITE ALUMINUM LETTER MOUNTED ONTO ALUMINUM BACKER OPTION 2 STILLWATER PARKING RAMP BLADE SIGN CITY OF STILLWATER, MN STILLWATER, MN BOB SHERLOCK JEFF WEISPFENNING 12 -14 -09 12 -15 -09 12 -16 -09 1 -4 -10 1" 1' signr Sign Art Co. Eau Claire, WI St. Paul, MN PH 651 688 -0563 FX 651- 688 -2081 THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED TO ASSIST YOU IN VISUALIZING OUR PROPOSAL. THIS DRAWING IS PROPERTY OF SIGN ART COMPANY AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED BY OTHERS. NON ILLUMINATED DOUBLE SIDED BLADE SIGN ATTACHED TO WALL PAINTED FLAT CUT OUT ALUMINUM LETTERS WITH ALUMINUM SUPPORT BACKERS PAGE 2 Sign Location -4" v 0' -6 STILLWATER PARKING RAMP BLADE SIGN CITY OF STILLWATER, MN STILLWATER, MN BOB SHERLOCK JEFF vVEISPFENNii.: 12 -14 -09 12 -15 -09 1 -4 -10 1 =1' (signart) Sign Art Co. Eau Claire, WI St. Paul, MN PH 651- 688 -0563 FX 651- 688 -2081 THIS DRAWING WAS CREATED TO ASSIST YOU IN VISUALIZING OUR PROPOSAL. THIS DRAWING IS PROPERTY OF SIGN ART COMPANY AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED BY OTHERS. attachment: FY 2010 CLG Grant Application Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: January 28, 2009 REQUEST: MNHS FY 2010 CLG Grant Application HPC MEETING DATE: February 1, 2009 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 14 BACKGROUND The City is applying for a CLG grant to complete the third and final phase of the Heirloom Homes and Landmark Sites program. This phase of the project would include the following work elements: Complete detailed histories for all 61 Landmark Sites. The histories will be completed by a qualified consultant meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. Data from the completed histories will be delivered to Minnesota Historical Society in an electronic database format. Histories will also be available on the City's website. Future Phases Once this phase of the project is completed, the City anticipates that a local designation program for individual properties and neighborhoods will be established by the City. Staff will also be submitting for a Legacy Grant to cover the match for the CLG grant. Since the Legacy Grant is state dollars it can be used to match the CLG Grant which is federal NPS dollars. RECOMMENDATION Review and make a recommendation to City Council regarding the FY 2010 CLG Grant Application to the Minnesota Historical Society. MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANT APPLICATION APPLICANT 1. Applicant: Name of City Mailing Address City /State /Zip City of Stillwater 216 4thSt N Stillwater, MN 55082 CONTACT INFORMATION 2. Authorized Official: Signature Ken Harycki, Mayor Print Name and Title 651 430 8822 Telephone Number 4. Project Director: Michel Pogge Name 216 4th St N Street Address Stillwater, MN 55082 City/State /Zip 651 430 8822 Telephone Number 3. Fiscal Officer: Larry Hansen Name 216 4th St N Street Address Stillwater, MN 55082 City/State /Zip 5. Heritage Preservation Commission Chair: Howard Lieberman Name 914 Greeley St S Street Address Stillwater, MN 55082 City/State /Zip 612 382 5200 Telephone Number PROJECT INFORMATION 6. Brief Project Description: This is the third phase of the City's Heirloom and Landmark Sites designation program. This phase will conduct research and complete written histories on the 61 Landmark Sites identified in Donald Empson's Designating Historic Homes and Historic Districts from June of 2006 on the City's Heirloom and Landmark Sites website. 7. Budget Summary Grant Funds Applicant Match Total Project Budget 8. Project Duration Date Received: MHS Number: $8,001 $9,042 $17,043 July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 PROJECT AREA J 9. Project Area (please check) fl A. Comprehensive Planning D. Local Desgination Forms F. Public Education (please specify): B. Survey E. National Register Nomination Forms El C. Evaluation 10. DETAILED 'PROJECT DESCRIPTION Applications must include ALL INFORMATION REQUESTED for the project area checked above as outlined in Part III —pages 2 -5 of the Certified Local Government Grants Manual. Include a discussion of how this project reflects the goals and strategies outlined in the 2005 -2010 statewide preservation plan. The City of Stillwater and the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission are seeking funding for the third phase of the City's Heirloom and Landmark Sites Program. The overall purpose of the program is A.) To acknowledge and reward those owners who have preserved or restored the integrity of their old houses. B.) To identify houses eligible for local designation, and to write detailed histories of those houses eligible for local designation, and C.) To establish personal contact with the owners of the houses eligible for local designation to form an advocacy group for local designation. This final phase of the program will focus on the 61 Landmark Sites listed in Donald Empson's Designating Historic Homes and Historic Districts dated June of 2006, see attachment "B Description of the activities which have resulted in the identification of the properties to be evaluated: This program is based on a series of previous CLG grant- funded projects. Since 1992, the city has completed ten architectural surveys in which significant historic structures were identified. In 2005, a Donald Empson was retained as a consultant to the City to evaluate the survey information and develop a plan to implement a local designation program. Mr. Empson recommended a two -tier program consisting of 1) Heirloom Homes and 2) Landmark Houses and Sites. Heirloom Homes are a cross section of homes representative of nineteenth- century Stillwater containing a fair amount of their original design elements. These homes are generally not eligible for listing in the NRHP, but due to local significance have the potential to be recognized in some manner. Landmark Houses and Sites are the finest historic homes and most remarkable sites in Stillwater. They have architectural integrity and strong ties to the history of Stillwater. These properties may be eligible for or are already listed in the NRHP and have the potential for local designation. Project products, steps and responsible party: The main element of the program is the interactive website that features Stillwater's significant historic properties. Each property listed will include a photo (both a current photo and, if available, a historic photo), location map and specific information including construction date, builder, architect, architectural style, and a narrative. The information for these listings will come from a variety of primary and secondary sources in order to complete a detailed survey of the property. Sources could include previously completed architectural surveys, previously completed SHPO inventories of surveyed properties, insurance maps, city directories, photographs, and other sources. The first step of implementing the program was to develop website (www.stillwater mn.org /history) for the program which was completed with a CLG grant in 2007 -2008. The key to the site is the ability to search for properties in a multitude of ways and to create personalized walking guides for these sites. Along with the initial website development, with the first grant in 2007 -2008, 69 Heirloom Homes were added to the website. The second phase of the project was completed and funded in part with a 2008 -2009 CLG Grant. An additional 51 properties were added with expanded information added for 12 of the properties bringing the sites total to 120 listed properties. Project Steps: Complete histories. July I, 2010 June 30, 2011. For the next phase the City is proposing to have the 61 identified Landmark Sites reviewed and included on the program's website. Since these sites represent Stillwater's significant historic sites there is limited information available on each of the sites; however, a comprehensive and detail review on these sites has never occurred. A variety of sources including previously completed SHPO inventories of surveyed properties, insurance maps, city directories, photographs, and other sources will be used to create the information that will be posting on the website. The consultant will also solicit voluntary participation from property owners employing a variety of means including: letters, open houses, and personal contact with the property owners. The consultant will be expected to personally meet with the homeowners, pointing out the historic characteristics of their home, and giving them copies of all the documents used in researching their house. At the conclusion of this program, the City will have 181 of the most significant historic houses in Stillwater thoroughly researched and written; the City will have potentially 181 homeowners aware of the historic nature of their homes, enthusiastic about preserving them, and hopefully a strong and willing advocacy group to support the ordinances necessary to establish local designation. 11. PROJECT PRODUCTS Provide a concise description of the products that will result from the project. This project is the third and final phase of what is anticipated as a three phase program to recognize the "Heirloom Homes" and the "Landmark Sites" in the City identified in the Designating Historic Homes and Historic Districts report by Mr. Donald Empson dated July 2006. Copies of all of the work products will be forwarded to SHPO. The third phase of the project would include the completion of detailed histories for all 61 Landmark Sites. The histories will be completed by a qualified consultant meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards. Data from the completed histories will be delivered to Minnesota Historical Society in an electronic database format. Histories will also be available on the City's website. Once the third phase of the project is completed the City anticipates that a local designation program for individual properties and neighborhoods will be established by the City in the future. 12. COMMUNITY SUPPORT Provide a concise statement summarizing demonstrated community support for this project. Cash match is one measure of community support. The Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission, Planning Commission and the Stillwater City Council have been monitoring the surveys and strongly support the program. As properties have been listed on the site, a number of the property owners have provided notes of support and gratitude for both the information that was developed on their home but also the honor of being part of the program. The City of Stillwater is planning to apply for a Minnesota Historical and Cultural Grant for the $6,999.00 cash match part of the grant. The City will be providing in -kind services and donated supplies amounting to $2,043.00 for the project project. With total in non federal dollars to match the CLG Grant will be $9,042.00. 13. PROJECT IMPACT Provide a concise statement describing the expected effect of the project on the community's awareness and under standing of local government in addressing local preservation issues. Describe any plans for promoting the project. This project will serve as an education tool for both the Community of Stillwater and to the larger community. This project will also provide a complete set of inventories for all of the Heirloom and Landmark Sites in the City of Stillwater. Finally, the project will provide a basis for any future local historic designations of sites, buildings and districts. 14. PROJECT PERSONNEL List principal project personnel and their qualifications. The City of Stillwater will retain the services of a qualified consultant to assist with the research and evaluation and report writing. This consultant will meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards (as published in the Federal Register of February 29, 1983) as stipulated in the project description. To assist the consultant, the Heritage Preservation Commission and Stillwater Planning staff will solicit the participation of local historians and the Washington Historical Society to help gather information and photos on these sites. The City Planning Department will be responsible for the management of the grant and serves as staff to the Heritage Preservation Commission. The City has budgeted 50 hours to the management of the grant and the project. Budget Item Grant Cash Applicant In -Kind Match Donated Total Consultant 566 hours $30.00 $8,001 $6,999 $15,000 Project Director 50 Hrs $30.75 $1,538 $1,538 HPC Meeting $280 $280 Photo Copies /Stamps $225 $225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL A. $8,001 B. $6,999 C. $1.538 D. $505 E. $17,043. 15. DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET Column A must not exceed the total of Columns B C D