HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-05 CC Packet
AGENDA
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
November 5, 1991
-
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director 4. Comm. Dev. Director 7. Fire Chief
2. Police Chief 5. Parks & Recreation a. Building Official
3. Public Works Di r. 6. Consulting Engineer 9. City Attorney
10. City C 1 e rk
11. City Coordinator
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
e
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meeting - September 24, 1991.
Regular & Recessed Meetings - October a, 1991
Regular Meeting - October 15, 1991
Special Meeting - October 22, 1991
INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS
1. Procl amati on of "Family Week" November 25 - 29, 1991.
e
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Variance to
the Sign Ordinance setback requirements (fifteen ft. required, zero ft.
provided) for the placement of a hundred sq. ft. monument-type building
identification and office directory sign, located at 1905-1983 So. Greeley
St. (Greeley Square) in the BP-C, Business Park Comm. Dist., James Waters,
Applicant. Case No. V/91-40.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 24, 1991
and mailed to affected property owners.
2. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Variance to
the Sign Ordinance for additional signage on a commercial retail
establishment which includes 24 in. channel letters on the rear building
facade and another additional sign mounted on a free-standing pylon at
14304 No. 60th St. in the BP-C Bus. Pk. Comm. Dist., Condura
Marketing/Tires Plus, Applicant. Case No. V/91-52.
Notice of the hearing was publisned in The Courier on October 24,1991
and mailed to affected property owners.
3. This is the day and time for tile Public Hearing to consider a Special Use
Permit for a residential use on the second level of a commercial structure
at 125 So. Main St. in the CBD, Central Bus. Dist., James & Kathleen
Granger, Applicants. Case No. SUP/91-54.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 24,1991
and mailed to affected property owners.
1
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Report on Financing Alternatives for 7.5 Acre Site in the Industrial Park.
2. Levee Wall Condition Report and Request for U.S. Corps of Engineer
Assistance.
~
NEW BUSINESS
1. Authorization for Furding for Design Services for Main St. Replacement
Awnings.
2. Request for partial ~unding of Highway 36 Traffic Study.
3. Amendment to Floodpl~in Regulation of Zoning Ordinance ZAT/91-2.
!
4. Downtown Utility con~ection Assistance and Facade Improvement Program.
,
5. Request Public Donat~ons for Downtown Benches Program.
I
6. Comments on Oak Park Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
7. Policy on Commission Appointments/Memberships.
8. Application for pay,*nt No.4 from Johnson Bros. Construction - DO\'intown
Improvement, L.I. 2Sr.
9. Resolution: Request for approval of Gambling Operation at St. Croix Club,
423 So. Main St., by Family Violence Network.
10. Resolution Accepting Work & Approving Application for Final Payr.~nt to
Hydrocon, Inc., L.I. 256, Cottages, Phase III, Sanitary Sewer, Lift
Station & Forcemain.
e
e
2
e
r iIlwater
~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA iJ
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
~
STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR .
OCTOBER 30, 1991
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF
ANNEXATION OF MTM LAND.
Research regarding the proposed annexation and Council
concerns is not complete. The information should be
available for the next regular Council meeting, November
19, 1991.
e
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
-I~,
e
First Bank
Midway
(IJ... L f1 ,?,P{ I
f,r( ~
C.bIA VI vi
2383 UnIversity Avenue
5t. Paul, Minnesota 55114
6'2 647-3500
November 4~ 1991
Mr. Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Stillwater Ci"ty' Hall .
216 Nor.th 4th Street
St i.ll wa te.r ,MN . .55082
. .
Dear Mr. Abrahamson:
I am writing this letter on behalf of .a. client of mine. Mr. David
Paradeau.president of;The Minnesota Zephyr. As .we have b~en his
bank'of.,account'fo,r several.years in.a most satisfactory relationship,
David' approached 'us'.to 'assist in the .fi,nanc1ng o'f the proposed 'Depot
buildi og. 'Out'.diScussions :began 'as. far back as. mid-1989.when this
. idea was more of ~ pipedream. However,as'the past'two years have
, progressed and obstacle after obstacle have been removed, it appears
now morethan:l1kely' that this proposal\has strong 'merit on which to
, bu11 ~L' . , ,
e
In' March of ,1991 we.showed Dave a strong ,interest to assist him in
,what then .was a '$7'50~'$'8'OO',OOO version of.,the pr'oject. We are still
interested7and :believe,the project has gr.eat potent;a~, however
First Bank'sunderwriting of .real estate has since undergone additional
conservatism and ,at this'time we are :searching for a fi,nancial partner
. .in this'project;to i'nclude the SBA'as well as other potential sources.
, .
One of.the additional items we have been diScussing is an issue you will
be dealing with ,;n:thenext couple of 'days. . 'As a lender We are not
comfo.rtablefimincin9.this'project without.the security of annexation.
. .Th1sis. necessary .to aSsure that the ,Zephyr can 'operate without' restriction
in order for US to place any validay in,the cash, flow of ,the operation.
Without that assurance this pr.oject cannot ,fi.nd fi,nancing .in 'my 'opinion.
Please call me if You have any questions whatsoever.
. .Si ncerely, .
M~
Gerald' H. .Thole
Pres i dent. .
. GHT lard'
CC: ,OavidParadeau
e
Member First Ban~ Sys1em
-
League of Minnesota Cities
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, MN 55101.2526
(612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986)
October 28, 1991
TO: City Clerks, cities with legislators on House and Senate
Elections Committees, Elections & Ethics Committee
members, MCFO Executive Committee members
FROM: Ann Higgins
RE: Draft resolution on postponement or repeal of
Presidential Primary
Enclosed please find a copy of a draft resolution calling on the
legislature to repeal (or at least postpone) the scheduled 1992
Presidential Primary. Local lawmakers in several districts have
indica~ed that it is important for local officials and constituents
to let them know that there is support for such action.
cities must act now to make legislators aware of local support for
proposals to repeal (or postpone) the Presidential Primary. Please
request local officials to take up the discussion of these issues at
e the next scheduled city council meeting..
Forward a copy of the resolution adopted by your city council to
local lawmakers immediately following the meeting. Please also let
me know of the action taken.
Encourage legislators who represent your city to co-sponsor
legislation. (See information below.)
'92 Presidential Primary adds to city election costs
During the '91 session, the League sought state funding of the '92
Presidential Primary to eliminate requirements for local government
to fund t~e costs of conducting balloting. The failure of the state
legislature to provide funding means that cities will be responsible
for paying for costs of conducting the primary at the polls on April 7,
1992, and incurring those added expenses as a portion of '92 city
budgets already impacted by the loss of state aid.
Legislation calling for repeal to be introduced
e
Senator John Marty, a member of the Senate Elections Committee and a
vocal critic of the statute establishing the Presidential Primary,
has introduced legislation calling for repeal of Chapter 207A, and
has requested a hearing on the bill during the special legislative
session scheduled January 6 - 17. It is important for cities to
indicate their support NOW for legislative action on this issue in
January. Grass roots concerns must be voiced in order to get
lawmakers and legislative leadership to recognize the need for
immediate action. February will be too late (when the regular
session is scheduled to begin)!
~
LKC Position
The LMC Legislative Committee comprised of the Board of Directors and 4It
the chairs of League legislative policy committees has identified the
issue of the Preside~tial Primary as a top priority for '92. The
League's current policy calls for lawmakers to fully fund all costs
costs of conducting the primary at the local level. New policy
recommended for '92 suggests ways in which such costs can be reduced
if the primary is held and calls again on the legislature to use
state and/or pOlitic41 party revenue sources to fund the primary.
Failing that, the League policy recommendation supports repeal of the
Presidential Primary., That policy recommendation is scheduled to be
considered for final ladoption by LMC member cities on November 21.
In advance of that dJte, cities are encouraged to let local lawmakers
know about concerns ~t the local level and to adopt the enclosed
resolution (or use Y3ur own wording) to emphasize the urgency of
difficulties facing iities in the absence of legislative action.
!
I
e
e
e
e
e
~
Members, Senate Elections & Ethics Committee
Chair, Jerome Hughes, Dist. 54, Maplewood
Vice Chair, Bill Luther, Dist. 47, Bklyn. Center, Bklyn. Park, New Hope
Richard Cohen, Dist. 64, st. Paul
Richard Halberg, Dist. 38, Burnsville
Dean Johnson, Dist. 15, Willmar
Doug Johnson, Dist. 6, Cook
Gary Laidig, Dist. 55, stillwater
John Marty, Dist. 63, Roseville
Pat McGowan, Dist. 48, Maple Grove
Roger Moe, Dist. 2, Erskine
Pat Piper, Dist. 31, Austin
Larry Pogemiller., Dist. 58, Minneapolis
Don Samuelson, Dist. 13, Brainerd
Members, House Elections Division
Linda Scheid, Chair, Dist. 47A, Brooklyn Park (resigned/effective 12/31)
Don Ostrom, Vice Chair, Dist. 23B, st. Peter
Ron Abrams, Dist. 45A, Minnetonka
Ben Boo, Dist. SB, Duluth
Gil Gutknecht, Dist. 33A, Rochester
Jerry Knickerbocker, Dist. 43B, Hopkins
Harold Lasley, Dist. 19A, Cambridge
Bob McEachern, Dist., 22A, Maple Lake
Tom Osthoff, Dist. 66A, St. Paul
Gene Pelowski, Dist. 34B, Winona
Loren Solberg, Dist. 3B, Bovey
4
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REPEAL OF PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY
e
WHEREAS, the statute establishing the Presidential Primary was
initially adopted without legislative hearings; and
WHEREAS, the legisla~ure has not provided reimbursement of local
government ~osts for conducting the primary; and
WHEREAS, the presidential primary is designed to provide voters an
opportunitYito express preferences for the nomination of
presidentiaf candidates by major national political parties;
and [
I
,
WHEREAS, the statuteiestablishing the Presidential Primary (M.S.
207A) requi~esvoters to declare which political party
ballot theYlwill receive prior to casting their vote; and
WHEREAS, such politiGal party voter identification will become
public information and a permanent record on the voter
registration file; and
WHEREAS ,
such record$ will be available for political campaign
activities, lincluding canvassing and fundraising; and
the purpose land effect of the balloting conducted during the ~
Presidential Primary are unrelated to the actual election of ..
candidates to public office; and
WHEREAS ,
WHEREAS, the outcome!of the Presidential Primary balloting will not
determine the election of candidates to public office in
Minnesota 01 at the national level;
THEREFORE, BE IT REs<1>LVED THAT, the
of the City of I calls on the state
legislature to postpqne the Presidential Primary for at least four
years in order for full funding to be approved at the state level,
eliminating the needifor any local government costs for conducting
the primary. I
(Alternate): 1
THEREFORE, BE IT RES LVED THAT, the
of the City of i calls on the state
legislature to repeaj the statute establishing the Presidential
Primary to eliminate requirements for local government to fund
the costs of the pri ,ary since such balloting is essentially a
political party acti~ity which should not be financed with tax
revenues.
e
-OVER-
WASHINGTON COUNTY
GOVERNMENT CENTER
OFFICE OF AUDITOR-TREASURER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH STILLWATER. MINNESOfA 55082.(){)()6
612/43()'{)175
F Yf
R. H. Stafford
Auditor.Treasurer
Mary Lou Larson
Executive Assistant
T. R. Greeder
#,st. Audttor.li"easurer
.
Pamela S. Mattila, CPA
Finance Manager
Gary Poser
Tax,Eleclions Manager
Nancy McPherson
License-Records-Manager
October 30, 1991
TO: Punch Card Precincts D
FROM: Gary Poser, Auditor-Treasurer ~ I
SUBJECT: p'residential Primary Ballots
The Secretary of State has notified our office that the state will provide paper ballots, absentee envelopes,
summary statements, summary statement envelopes without cost to the county for the presidential primary. The
county has the option of using the punch card voting equipment. The Secretary of State would reimburse as
much of the punch card ballot printing costs as their budget permits after paying all paper ballot costs.
The state will not reimburse for voting system programming or testing.
e
The punch card process on election day as outlined by Joe Mansky of Secretary of State's office would be:
Separate voting booths would contain either DFL only or IR only ballot pages.
Voter would request specific party ballot from ejection judge when signing roster.
Party ballot requested would be marked on polling place roster.
Judge would hand voter punch card ballot and direct voter to appropriate DFL or IR voting booth.
Voted punch cards would be placed in one ballot box and counted by the machine.
Voters standing in line to wait for an empty booth would be clearly Identifiable as voting DFL or IR by any
person in the polling place. Our office feels a number of complaints will be received from voters who not
only must declare a party to an election judge to receive a ballot but would also be easily identified by
party while standing in line.
Due to the easy party identification of punch card voters and the availability of paper ballots without cost
to the county, our office has decided not to use the punch card voting equipment for the Presidential Primary
on April 7, 1992. Your precinct(s} will be provided with paper ballots and your judges will count them at
the polling place along with your absentee ballots. .
If you have any comments or questions regarding the use of paper ballots for the presidential primary, feel
free to contact me at 430-6184.
,
cc: RHS, TRG
e
Washington County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age and handicapped status in employment or the provision of services.
e
BID - 1992 SPRING ICE RENTAL
October 22, 1991
TO:
FROM:
RE:
City of Stillwater
Wayne Orn, SCV Company, Inc.
BID - 1992 SPRING ICE RENTAL
The SCV Company, Inc. bid for 1992 Spring Ice Rental is
$80/hour for 36 hours of more starting on or about April 6
and ending on or about April 24, 1992.
e
e
"
'. if-
c:Pc7;,hJ- ~J' / /99/
--
.!re: ~/"/- (f??~J-XM.~~ k~~d
,
,
1
1
--
'i
'I
i
--.._._,--,.,..._-_._-_...~._----_.
!
_..-- -"-'--'-"-~-'--'-"-'-
I
!
------.-.--.---.-,-----,.-----..---..-.-
BID - 1992 SUMMER ICE RENTAL
e
Oc tober 22, 1991
TO:
City of Stillwater
FROM:
Wayne Orn, SCV Company, Inc.
RE:
BID - 1992 SUMMMER ICE RENTAL
The SCV Company, I nc. bid for 1992 Summer Ice Ren tal is
$12,501 for the period of time between June '11 and July 11,
1992.
e
The SCV Company, Inc. has no plans to sell or sublet any ice
time to other users at the present time, but would 1 ike. to
reserve the right to coordi nate th i s possi bi 1 i ty wi th the
arena manager to maximize the use of the facil ity.
The SCV Company, Inc. agrees to be bound by Exhibit A.
e
e
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
September 24, 1991
4:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present: Councilmembers Farrell, Funke, Opheim (arrived
at 4:40 p.m.), and Mayor Abrahamson
Absent: Councilmember Bodlovick
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Julie Kink, The Courier
Others: Jim Stevenson, Diane Berthel
RECOGNIZATION OF SECRETARY SHIRLEY MONTBRIAND
Mayor Abrahamson read
Montbriand for her 20
Stillwater as Secretary,
the City.
a resolution commending Shirley
years of service to the City of
and presented her with a gift from
e
WORKSHOP - FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION
Council met with Fire Relief Association Representative Jim
Stevenson, and Diane Berthel of Piper Jaffery & Hopwood, to
discuss the Fire Relief Association fund. Ms. Berthel
explained that she oversees the management of the fund and
updated Council on the investments and assets in the plan.
Mr. Stevenson requested that the pension payout amount of
$2,000 per year be increased to $2,250 per year. Council
discussed the potential risk to the City should there be a
shortfall in the fund. Mayor Abrahamson asked that Council-
member Bodlovick be given an opportunity to review the
information and that the decision be made at the next regular
meeting.
OTHER
Chanqe Order Request for Parkinq Lot
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to approve the change order request for North Main st. and Lowell
Inn/Rivertown Commons Parking Lots in the amount of $5,000.
(All in favor)
e
Fire Station Ventilatinq System
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Opheim
1
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
Septemer 24, 1991
e
to approve the proposal by Peter Racchini
provide architectural services for the fire
system for an esti!mated fee of $1,800. (All
!
and Associates to
station ventilating
in favor)
,
,
Ice Arena Manaqer'~ Request to Use City Car
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to deny the requesl't by the Ice Arena Manager to use the Building
Official's car, on a permanent basis, to pick up supplies. (All
in favor) I
,
I
Temporary Liquor Jicense
!
Motion by council~ember Opheim, seconded by
to approve the relquest by the Business and
organization for al temporary liquor license
26, 1991. (All i~ favor)
i
,
!
Relocation of U.S. West's
Councilmember Farrell
Professional Women's
for Saturday, October
Motion by Council ember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to approve the elstimated expenditure of $5,666 to relocate the
telephone system for U.S. West on the north end of Main Street.
(All in favor)
-
,
I
!
Employment of Ken ~ress as Labor Maintenance Worker
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Opheim
to adopt the appropriate resolution employing Ken Kress as Labor
Maintenance Worker in the Public Works Department. (Resolution
No. 91-190)
Ayes - Councilmembers Farrell,
Abrahamson
Nays - None
Funke,
Ophe im,
and
Mayor
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by council~ember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adjourn the mee1ting at 5:55 p.m. (All in favor)
I
I
ATTEST:
~LERK
MAYOR
CITY
Resolutions:
No. 91-190 - Employing Ken Kress as Labor Maintenance Worker
,
e
2
'"
e
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 8, 1991
3:00 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present:
Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell (arrived at 4:45 P.M.),
Funke, and Mayor Abrahamson.
Absent:
Council member Opheim
City Coordinator Kriesel (arrived at 4:55 P.M.)
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Consulting Engineer Peters
Comm. Dev. Director Russell
City Clerk Johnson
Also Present:
Press:
Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Others:
Ray Kirchner, Monty Brine, Michael McGuire, John Dahl, Joseph
Naumann, Jim Durking, Eldon Robe, Jerome Halloran, David
Sellergren, Ken Grund, Kevin Shoeberg.
Undergrounding of Utilities - Lowell Inn
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to
underground utilities for two power poles in front of the Lowell Inn, 102 No.
Second St., witn the understanding that the owner of the property will pay the
assessment. (All in favor).
e
Paving of Lily Lake Parking Lot
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to
approve the quote of $12,644.00 received from Asphalt Specialties for the
paving of the Lily Lake Arena parking lot. (All in favor).
RECONVENED ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES, L.I. 257
1. This is the day and time for the Reconvened Assessment Hearing for certain
properties affected by L.I. 257, Downtown Construction.
Notice of the hearing was mailed to affected property owners on
September 19, 1991.
a. ABS Co.
City Attorney Magnuson explained that this property is commonly known as
the Staples Mill site. The original assessment was $89,839.50. However,
Ray Kirchner, appraiser, stated the increase in value to the property with
the improvement would be $37,500.00, a reduction of $52,339.50.
Consul ti ng Engi neer Peters further exp 1 ai ned the improvements whi ch were
installed for the property.
e
1
.,..
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
e
Attorney Kevin Shoe~erg, representing ABS Co., explained his client1s
objection to the aS$essment figure and stated their appraiser listed the
assessment between $13 ,000 - $27,000 and further stated the benefi t is to
the land. After further discussion, Council stated they would 1 ike to
review the appraisal drafted for ABS Co. Mr. Shoeberg will forward a copy
of that appraisal ffr Council review.
!
Motion by CouncilmemberiBodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to continue
the assessment hearing for L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to
ABS Co., to October 22, II 1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All in favor).
b. Brick Alley .
Mr. Magnuson explai~ed this property covers the entire Brick Alley site,
but not the HarvestiStates Feed Store. The original assessment was
$54,280.70, but wit~ the deletion of a water service assessment and fire
service stub the fi~ure will be $48,765.00. Mr. Peters stated the
improvements includfd reconstruction of the sanitary sewer, new street,
curbing and sidewal~, storm sewer and undergrounding of utilities.
I
Michael McGuire, pattner in the New Stillwater Project/Brick Alley
property, presentedjhis appraisal. Mr. McGuire stated his square footage ~
figure and the Cityls differed somewhat which would affect the assessment ...
figure. He also stqted he does not agree with the square footage
assessment method fqr downtown. Mr. McGuire added that the storm sewer
system \'Jas put in for his property in the 1980's and he should not be
charged for this. ~e further stated that there are no buried utilities on
Main St. which woulq affect his property. Also, one sanitary sewer
connection was dele~ed and the roof lead and basement springs do not flow
into the sanitary s~'wer. Mr. McGuire contends the Brick Alley property is
not an .income produ ing building because they have a number of unpaid
rents which have a ,irect impact on the owners.
,
John Dahl, McKinsey iMetro Appraisal of White Bear Lake, further explained
the appraisal for t~e Brick Alley property. Mr. McGuire will forward a
copy of his apprais~l to the City for review.
Motion by Councilmember IFunke, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to continue
the assessment hearing ~or L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to
the Brick Alley, to Oct Iber 22, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All in favor).
c. Dock Cafe !
City Attorney Magnu~on stated the original assessment was $23,346.15 and
the appraiser found ithat the benefit to the site was $28,000.00.
Consulting Engineer Peters stated that work done included sidewalks being
2
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
rebuilt, an increase in water pressure because of the increase in size of
the water main and increase in parking.
Mr. McGuire again took issue with the area assessment and said all
benefits to the property are indirect. There was no work being done east
of the railroad tracks. Also, the Dock Cafe invested money in a waterline
from Water St. to the Dock Cafe.
John Dahl explained his appraisal for the Dock Cafe which used the same
process as the Brick Alley. City Attorney Magnuson stated the improvement
does not have to touch the property as long it benefi ts from it. Mr.
McGuire will forward a copy of Mr. Dahl's appraisal to the City Council
for review.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to continue
the assessment hearing for L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to.
the Dock Cafe, to October 22, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All in favor).
e
d. Citizens State Bank of Montgomery
Mr. Magnuson stated the original assessment for this property was
$93,057.75 with a revision of the assessment, per Mr. Kirchner's report,
to $61,000. Consulting Engineer Peters gave a brief description of
improvement which included storm sewer construction, a new sanitary sewer,
rehabilitation of sewer manholes, increased size of water main and fire
stub.
Mr. Nauman, the attorney for the Citizens State Bank of Montgomery, stated
the benefit to the property is not as high as the City has stated. He
added the property is adequately served by a sewer system, the same can be
said for streets, curb and sidewalk. They are trying to sell the property
for $450,000, which is what it is worth before and after improvements.
Mr. Nauman said they do not believe a buyer would be willing to pay more
for a new sewer, sidewalks and so on.
Mr. Kirchner stated he compared this property to similar projects in otner
cities and since those projects were completed, there was higher occupancy
downtown and the businesses were more viable than before. He also talked
to the assessor who stated land values had increased 30% to 50%.
Mr. Nauman stated his client does not wish to go to court and asked if
there is a figure that would be agreeable to the City. Tneir appraisal
will be forwarded for Council review.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to continue
the assessment hearing for L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to
e
3
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting ~
October 8, 1991 ...
the Citizens State Bank of Montgomery, to October 22, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All
in favor).
e. Maple Island .
Mr. Magnuson stated !the original assessment for the plant site was
$41,491.81 and the a~praisal increased the value to $45,000; the prison
site original assess~ent was $351,679.19, with the appraised increase in
value reduced to $51,,000. The City Attorney and Finance Director
recommended that the entire assessment be spread against Parcel 9023-0050
since the remaining ~ite is steep sloped and unbuildable. Mr. Peters
summari zed the i mpro!vements.
!
Mr. Jerome Halloran,! representing Maple Island, said they still feel the
amount of assessment~ is greater than tne benefit to the two properties.
Mr. Halloran then ad~ressed the plant site and stated he has no quarrel
with the 7-1/2% factpr, but it should be applied to the value of the land
only for both the pilison and plant site. The building has no value
because it is very old. Also, Maple Island had soil tests and there is a
high water level the!re.
i
(Counci1member Farre~l arrived).
Mr. Kirchner eXP1ain~d his reasoning for using both land and buildings in e
that the buildings are classified as nistoric and will receive major tax
credits for renovatipn and the plant is too substantial to be torn down.
Further discussion fpl10wed on these points.
!
I
Moti on by Council member Farrell, seconded by Council member Funke to conti nue
the assessment hearing fpr L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to
Maple Island, Inc., to O~tober 22, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All in favor).
I
i
f. Stillwater Yacht! Club
Mr. Magnuson stated the original assessment for the Yacht Club property
was $286,411.00 with' the revised assessment to be $204,000.00. Mr. Peters
summarized the irrvro ements which were the addition of public water to the
site, additional par ing and new street, curbing, sidewalk and buried
utilities on the app oach streets.
Dave Se11ergren, spe king for the Yacht Club, stated the amount is way too
hi gh. He had submitted a letter of objecti on to the assessments and
presented a copy of their appraisal to the City. They felt, that with the
excepti on of water s~rvice, there was no benefi t from tile improvements.
Also, the land canno~ be further developed; the second phase of the
Downtown Improvementj will include constructing a park on Mulberry Point.
4
e
...
e
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
Mr. Kirchner
value of the
$5,000,000.
for review.
responded that his appraisal is partly based on the increased
slips that were sold -- that property is in excess of
Mr. Sellergren presented the City a copy of trleir appraisal
Motion by Council member Funke, seconded by Council member Bodlovick to continue
the assessment hearing for L.I. 257, Downtown Construction, as it relates to
the Stillwater Yacht Club, to October 22, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. All in favor.
Downtown Plan, L.I. 257, Principal Deletions from Assessments for Water
Stubs, Fire Stubs and Storm Sewer Stubs.
Moti on by Council member Bodl ovi ck, seconded by Council member Funke to adopt
the appropriate resolution deleting the principle amounts for water, sewer,
and fire stubs from the original assessment roll for L.r. 257, Downtown
Construction. (Resolution No. 91-201)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke and Mayor Abrahamson.
Nays - None
Recess of Assessment Hearing for L.I. 257, Downtown Improvements
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded DyCouncilmember Funke to continue
the assessment hearing for L. I. 257, Downtovm Improvements, until October 22,
1991 at 8:00 P.M. (All in favor).
RECESS
Motion by Council member Funke, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to recess
the meeting at 5:30 P.M. (All in favor).
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
No. 91-201 - Principal Deletions from Assessments for L.I. 257, Downtown
Improvements.
5
,
~ l
e
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 8, 1991
7:00 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present:
Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim
and Mayor Abrahamson.
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Consulting Engineer Peters
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Julie Kink, The Courier
ASSESSMENT HEARINGS
e
1. This is the day and time for the Assessment Hearing for L.I.
271, construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, utility
services, storm sewer and street construction for Curve Crest
Blvd.
Notice of the hearing was published in the Courier on
September 19, 1991 and mailed to affected property owners.
Consulting Engineer Peters described the improvements and
project costs. Jim Kellison, representing Curve Crest
Properties, questioned why the MSA funds for this project
were reduced. Dan Sandager and Doug Thomas, representing the
Sandager family partnership which owns five lots affected by
the assessments, also expressed objections to the diversion
of MSA funds.
City Coordinator Kriesel explained the assessment history for
the Industrial Park area improvements. Mr. Kriesel indicated
that prior policy was to use MSA funds to help pay for both
MSA and non-MSA streets and that an average per acre street
and utility assessment was also established for improvement
projects in the Industrial Park area. Mr. Kriesel also
recommended that the Council at least assess the amount that
was stated at the improvement hearing.
e
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember
Bodlovick to adopt the appropriate resolution adopting the
assessment for L.I. 271, Curve Crest Blvd., based upon the
feasibility report, of $16,520 per acre for streets and
utilities, plus sewer and water services. (Resolution No. 91-215)
1
(
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
e
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
2. This is the day and time for the Assessment Hearing for L.r.
273, construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, utility
services, storm sewer and street construction for Highlands
of StillwaterJ
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on
September 19, 11991 and ma i led to af fected property owners.
Motion by Counci1*ember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adopt the app~opriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.r. 273, Highlands of Stillwater. (Resolution No. 91-202)
Ayes - Councilmemqers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
3. This is the qay and time for the Assessment Hearing for L.r.
272, constrqction of storm water drainage and street
improvements dn Hudson Street. ~
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on ,.,
September 19,11991 and mailed to affected property owners.
Motion by Council~ember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Opheim
to adopt the app~opriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.r. 272, Hudson ~treet. (Resolution No. 91-204)
I
Ayes - Councilmemtiers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abra~amson
Nays - None
4.
This is the jay and time for the Assessment Hearing for L.r.
254, constru tion of sanitary sewer repairs, water services,
catch basins, leads and street construction for Mulberry
Street. ;
I
Notice of 1 the hearing was published in The Courier on
September 19,11991 and mailed to affected property owners.
Consulting ~ngineer Peters explained the project and
construction ~osts.
Willie Biessn~r, 306 N. 4th, owns two parcels affected by the
assessments a~d objected to Lots 7,8, and 9 being assessed as
front footag~ rather than side footage. Jim Jacobs, 503 W.
Mulberry, que!stioned the change from $27 per foot assessment ~
to $45 per foot. John Welshons, 415 W. Mulberry, objected to ,.,
the changes ~ade to the mock assessment role. Jim Rutten,
507 W. Mulb~rry, stated that all the available MSA funds
should be u,ed for this project. Lois Peterson, 504
I 2
I
e
e
e
~
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
Mulberry, stated that she has been inconvenienced by the
construction and is trying to sell a house on Mulberry.
Wilfred Buhl, 406 W. Mulberry, stated that two trees he had
planted on the boulevard were removed during construction.
Mayor Abrahamson explained how the assessment figures were
determined. Council discussed a future assessment policy and
a possible suspension of street projects until a policy is
established. Recent assessments were discussed: the Pine and
Churchill project was assessed at $35 per foot; the Third
and Orleans project was assessed at $30 per foot.
Motion by Mayor Abrahamson, seconded by Councilmember Funke to
adopt the appropriate resolution adopting the assessments for
L.I. 254, Mulberry Street, at $35 per front foot. (Resolution No.
91-254)
Ayes - Councilmembers Funke, Opheim, and Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - Councilmembers Bodlovick and Farrell
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to consider parcel 10690-5750, 306 No. 4th st., as side footage
rather than front footage as requested by the property owner.
(All in favor)
(Council took a five-minute recess and reconvened at 9:00 p.m.)
MISCELLANEOUS ASSESSMENTS
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick,
Farrell to adopt the appropriate
assessment for L.I. 265-2, Lily
(Resolution No. 91-209)
seconded by Councilmember
resolution adopting the
Lake Weed Harvesting.
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to adopt the appropriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.I. 009, Diseased Tree Removal. (Resolution No. 91-207)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adopt the appropriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.I. 277, Miscellaneous Charges. (Resolution No. 91-208)
3
..
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
e
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Motion by Councilmbmber Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to adopt the appropriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.I. 278, Miscellaneous Charges. (Resolution No. 91-206)
i
Ayes - Councilmemb~rs Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrah~mson
Nays - None :
Motion by
Bodlovick
assessment
210)
Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember
to ado~t the appropriate resolution adopting the
for L.r. 279, Water Line Repairs. (Resolution No. 91-
Ayes - Councilmemb~rs Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrah~mson
Nays - None
I
I
,
,
Motion by Councilm~mber Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to approve the deferral of special assessments for L.I. 279 as
requested. (All i~ favor)
e
Motion by Council~ember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adopt the appr~priate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.I. 280, Underg~ound Electric Service Charge. (Resolution
No. 91-203) I
Ayes - Councilmemb~rs Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrah~mson
Nays - None !
Motion by Council~mber Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to adopt the apprbpriate resolution adopting the assessment for
L.I. 281. (Resolut!ion No. 91-205)
Ayes - councilmembl-rs Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrah~mson
Nays - None :
!
Motion by councillmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Farrell to adopt the appropriate resolution adopting
certification of I assessments to Washington County Audi tor's
Office, for delinqpent sewer and garbage. (Resolution No. 91-211)
I
Ayes - Councilmembbrs Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and ~
Mayor Abrahamson ~
Nays - None
4
.
e
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 8, 1991
OTHER BUSINESS
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember
Bodlovick to approve the increase in the Fireman's Relief
Association Retirement Fund as requested. (All in favor)
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Funke to adopt the appropriate resolution employing Zamboni
operators and concession workers for the Ice Arena for the 1991-
92 season. (Resolution No. 91-212)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Council scheduled October 29 at 4:30 p.m. for a workshop
with Jim Junker to discuss the recycling contract.
e
Council
meeting,
downtown.
set October 15, immediately following the regular
for an executive session regarding three appraisals
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded
Bodlovick to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
by Councilmember
(All in favor)
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
91- 215 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 271
91- 202 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 273
91- 204 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 272
91- 214 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 254
91- 209 - Adopting the assessment for L. I . 265-2
91- 207 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 009
91- 208 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 277
91- 206 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 278
91- 210 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 279
e 91- 203 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 280
91- 205 - Adopting the assessment for L. I. 281
91- 211 - Certification of assessments
91- 212 - Employing Ice Arena staff
5
.. ,"
e
e
e
e
e
e
'"
REGULAR MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 15, 1991
7:00 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present:
Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim and Mayor
Abrahamson.
Absent:
None
Also Present:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Consulting Engineer Moore
Comm. Dev. Director Russell
Public Works Director Junker
City Clerk Johnson
Press:
Lee Ostrem, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
St. Croix Valley Press
Terri Galles, Bob Lafayette, Dennis Sullivan, Lin Blaskovich,
Richard Kilty, John Cox.
Others:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve the
minutes of the Regular and Recessed Meetings of October 1, 1991 as presented.
(All in favor).
INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Lin Blaskovich - Proclamation, Red Ribbon Campaign Week, October 19 - 25,
1991.
Mayor Abrahamson and the Council presented a procl amati on supporti ng tt1e
week of October 19-25, 1991 as Red Ribbon Week, encouraging citizens to
participate in drug prevention education activities, and Lin Blaskovich,
representing the Red Ribbon Campaign Committee, presented flyers and red
ribbons to Council.
2. Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to Terri Galles for
successfully directing the HRA Seniors Center and Apartments Project.
Mayor Abrahamson and the Council presented a Certificate of Appreciation
to Terri Gall es, Deputy Di rector of Washi ngton Co. HRA, and the HRA for
tfleir efforts in creating the Ann Bodlovick Senior Apartments, The Senior
Center and Community Volunteer Set'vices Center in the City of Stillwater.
STAFF REPORTS
1. Public Works Director -
1
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
Stillwater Elks Request to Sell Christmas Trees at Lily Lake Tennis
Courts.
Moti on by Counci 1 member Bodl ovi ck, seconded by Council member Funke to
authorize the Stillwater Elks to again use the Lily Lake Tennis Courts to
Christmas trees from November 18 - December 21, 1991. (All in favor).
sell
St. Croix Valley Rell igious Education Program Request for Barricades on So.
Fifth St. I
Moti on by Council member! Funke, seconded by Council member Bodl ovi ck to
authorize the Religious Education Program at St. Mary's SC11001 at 423 So.
Fifth St. to use barricades on Fifttl St., in front of the school, from 11:15
A.M to 12:00 Noon. (All in favor).
2. Community Development Director - No Report.
3. Finance Director -
Purchase of Computer
Moti on by Council member Funke, seconded by Counci 1 member Opheim to authori ze
the purchase of a computer and pri nter for the Fi nance Dept. ( All in favor).
4. Consulting Engineerl -
Repair of Manhole on Fourth & Wilkin Streets
Motion by Councilmember. Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
the repair of the manho~e on the northwest corner of Wilkins
Streets at an approxima~e cost of $3,100. (All in favor).
Funke to approve
and Fourth
5.
,
I
City Coordinator - No Report.
6. City Clerk - No. Report.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS I
1. Report from Armory Committee.
Mr. Russell reported that the committee met on Oct. 9 and reviewed an
offer from the proptrty owner next to the Armory site to sell the 1 and to
the City for $330,OpO and the Committee felt this was a good offer.
Distribution of a s~rvey to various community groups to determine the uses
for the Armory, contacting our Legislators for their support in expansion
of the Armory and dlrecting the Finance Director to research funding
for purchase of thel land were discussed. Also discussed were the
enhancements that 'spould be included in the Armory plans.
Motion by CouncilmemberlOpheim, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick.
authorizing the Mayor t~ send letters, to the City's State Legislators,
requesting support for ~ nevi Armory. (All in favor).
!
2. Approval for Contra~t with NSP for Downtown Improvement Work.
2
,
e
e
e
e
e
e
*4
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve
the contract with NSP for the undergrounding of utilities on No. Main St.,
from Laurel to Elm Street, at an estimated cost of $70,000. (All in favor).
Motion by Council member Farrell, seconded by Council member Bodlovick to
approve the contract with Northern States Power for utility work in the
Downtown at a cost of $407,259.00. (All in favor).
3. American Engineering Testing, Inc. proposal for analysis. of contaminated
soil on No. Main St.
Moti on by Counci 1 member Ophei m, seconded by Council member Funke to approve the
proposal of American Engineering Testing, Inc. for soil testing at 501 No.
Main St. (All in favor).
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for Authorization for Lily Lake Park Plan.
Mr. Russell explained that the Parks Department would like to make some
improvements next to the Lily Lake Beach and a proposal, for $360.00, was
received from Amy Stefan for development of a plan.
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke to authorize
the study of an overall plan for the beach and landing area of Lily Lake.
(All in favor).
Discussion of Structure near Lily Lake Pk.
Council discussed the complaints received regarding graffiti on the walls
of a basement structure adjacent to Lily Lake Park and methods to nmke it
less of a nuisance to the Park and adjacent neighbors. The structure was
painted and efforts will be made to partially remove it.
2. Implications from the 1991 Minn. Wetlands Conservation Act.
Mr. Moore discussed the changes brought about by the 1991 Minnesota
Wetlands Conservation Act as it relates to management of any wetlands in
the City of Stillwater.
CONSENT AGENDA
Moti on by Counci 1 member Bodl ovi ck, seconded by Counci 1 member Funke to approve
the Consent Agenda of October 15, 1991 including the following: (All in
favor) .
1. Directing Payment of Bills. (Resolution No. 91-213)
2. The following Contractor's Licenses:
Biagini Brothers, Inc. General Contractor New
1103 Payne Ave.
St. Paul, Mn. 55101
3
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular f"leeting
Broadway Builders
P.O. Box 32
Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042
Capital Utilities, Inc.
4120 Isle Ave.
Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042
Eagle Contracting
1139 County Road H2
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55~27
!
William Hayes Constructi~n
P.O. Box 10855 !
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55110
J & J In su 1 at in g
15960 180th St. E.
Hastings, Mn. 55033
Liberty Construction
458 Burlington Rd.
St. Paul, Mn. 55119
Midwest Framers, Inc.
16820 Wren St. N.W.
Andover, Mn. 55304
Morgan Stevens Homes, Ind.
2226 Berland Place I
St. Paul, Mn. 55119 !
New Homes Coordinated
2230 Orwell Ct. No.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Paramount Homes
P.O. Box 24038
Apple Valley, Mn. 55124
Rivard Masonry
1474 23rd St.
Houlton, Wi 54082
General Contractor
Excavators
Excavators
General Contractor
Insulation
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
Masonry & Brick Work
4
,,-
e
New
New
New
Rene\va 1
New
Nevi
e
New
New
Rene\va 1
New
Re ne\'ia 1
e
e
e
e
-...
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
Schield Construction Co.
13604 Ferris Ave.
Apple Valley, Mn. 55124
Excavators
New
SO.Lake Construction of
of Forest Lake, Inc.
920 West Broadway
Forest Lake, Mn. 55025
Stillwater Sign Co.
804 West Laurel St.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
General Contractor
New
Sign Erection
New
Thompson Decorating
285 Crestview Dr.
Hastings, Mn. 55033
Painting
New
Titan Construction, Inc.
6414 47th St. No.
Oakdale, Mn. 55128
Twin City Fireplace
1525 W. River Rd. No.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55411
Valley Cement Co.
14345 Guthrie Ave.
Apple Valley, Mn. 55124
General Contractor
New
Fireplace Installation Renewal
Masonry & Brick Work
New
Western Excavating
565 No. Ferndale Rd.
Wayzata, Mn. 55391
Excavators
New
3.
4.
Submission of Claim from Craig Hoolihan for damage to car from falling uNo
Parking" sign at Main and Chestnut Streets.
Set Public Hearing date of Nov. 5, 1991 for the following Planning Cases:
a. Case No. SUB/91-50 - Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement
of a 28 sq. ft. free-standing sign for a retail use at 110 So. Greeley
St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential Dist., Melissa Johnson,
Applicant.
b. Case No. V/91-51 - Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for
construction of a garage on a corner lot (30 ft. required, 17 ft.
requested) & to the size requirements for an accessory building (1000
sq. ft. required, 1008 sq. ft. proposed) at 317 No. Owens St. in the
RB, Two-Family Residential Dist., Donald Hill, Applicant.
c. Case No. V/91-52 - Variance to the Sign Ordinance for additional
5
.
.
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
e
1
signage on a comntrcial retail establishment which includes 24 in.
channel letters o~ the rear building facade and another additional sign
mounted on a free~standing pylon at 14304 No. 60th St. in the BP-C Bus.
Pk. Comm. Dist., Condura Marketing/Tires Plus, Applicant.
d. Case No. V/91-53 I Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of
an 85 sq. ft. pyl n sign, 18 ft. in height, at 110 So. Greeley St. in
the RB, Two-Famil Residential Dist., Stillwater Sign Co., Applicant.
e. Case No. SUP/91-5 - Special Use Permit for a residential use on the
second level of a, commercial structure at 125 So. Main St. in the CBD,
Central Bus. Dist., James & Kathleen Granger, Applicants.
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS .
Appointment to Park ~nd Recreation Commission
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke to
appointment of Ken Meist$r to the Park and Recreation Commission.
favor ).
approve the
{All in
i
i
Certificate of Appre~iation for Cub Foods for Promoting Fire Prevention
Week i
Motionoy Council member ~phei m, seconded by Council member Funke to authori ze a
Certificate of Appreciation to Cub Foods for imprinting 600,000 Cub Food bags
with fire prevention inf<;>rmation. (All in favor).
! .
Discussion of County I Project on County Rd. 64 (McKusick Rd.)
Council had a short discussion regarding the above project and County
Public Hearing to beiheldin the City Council Chambers on October 16.
Consulting Engineer ~oore stated that this i~ an FAU project and the
public hearing consi$ts of a public informational meeting on tile roadway
design. Mr. Moore wlll present a Feasibility Study for Council
information.
Discussion of GaraVa~ia Nuisance House
Some neighbors have complained that the windows on the north side of the
house have been knocked out and need to be boarded up. City Attorney
Magnuson stated an e~ergency notice will be sent to the owners to
accomplish this, andiif they fail to do so, the City can take care of it.
e
Discussion of Road W rk at the Cottages
Mayor Abrahamson que~t10ne the cut 1n the
Cottage Dr. Mr. Moo~e stated this is part
asked them to repair lit.
street of the 1300 block of
of the HRA project and he has
STAFF REPORTS (Continued~
City Coordinator - N1 Report.
City Clerk - No Report.
~
o
e
..
e
e
e
'.,
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
Council recessed and reconvened at 8:25 P.M.
Consulting Engineer -
Construction of Sewer Pipes in Downtown
Motion by COllncilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmenber Bodlovick to
approve the recommendations of the Consulting Engineer for restoration of
sewer pipe by using Insituform on Olive, Nelson and Third Streets. (All in
favor) .
Change Order for Downtown Improvements, L.I. 257
Motion by Council member Funke, seconded by Council member Opheim to approve
Change Order No.1, in the amount of $2,718.00, for Signing Changes for L.I.
257, Downtown Improvements. (A 11 in favor).
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve
Change Order No.2, in the amount of $89,360.00, for addition of Light Option
No.1 for L.I. 257, Downtown Improvements. (All in favor).
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to
approve Change Order No.5, in the amount of $2,016.00, for addition of two
Traffic Signs for L.I. 257, Downtown Improvements. (All in favor).
Motion by Council member Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to approve
Change Order No.6, at no extra cost, designating the color, brown, for Light
Standards for L.I. 257, Downtown Improvements. (All in favor).
Motion by Councilmernber Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to
approve Change Order No.7, in the amount of $22,765.00, addition of No. Main
St. and Lowell Inn Parking Lot Lighting for L.I. 257, Downtown Improvements.
(All in favor).
Motion by Council member Funke, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve
Change Order No.9, in the amount of $48,630.00, deleting Wall Closure and 18"
Casing for L.I. 257, Dovmtown Improvements. All in favor.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to approve
Supplemental Agreement No.3 adding four Electrical Connection Cabinets to
L.I. 257, Dmmtown Improvements, in the amount of $12,540.00. (All in favor).
STAFF REPORTS (Continued)
Discussion of Store Canopy on No. Main St.
Mr. Russell explained there has been some damage from the backhoe trying
to work under the canopy attached to businesses on the west side of No.
Main St., north of Chestnut St. He recommended leaving it down until
after construction is finished and suggested City participation in
7
Stillwater City Council Minutes
October 15, 1991
Regular Meeting
replacing the canopy, for an approximate cost of $10,000, which could come
from the Downtown Prpject funds. The canopy could then be consistent with
the Downtown Plans. I Further discussion followed regarding City
participation in funping.
Motion by Councilmember ppheim, seconded by Councilrnember Funke to authorize
the Comm. Dev. Director ~o approaci'l the property owners on the \'>lest side of
Main St., north of Chesthut St., regarding sharing of costs for replacement of
the canopy which must co~e down due to Downtown construction. (Ayes - 3; Nays
- 2, Councilmember Bodlo~ick and !vlayor Abrahamson).
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS (C~ntinued)
Delegates to Nationa~ League of Cities Conference
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to authorize
the attendance of possibly three Councilmembers and one Staff person at the
National League of Cities conference in December. (All in favor).
I
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS I
1. Carole V. Ryden, representing Sandra Boenm & Assoc., regarding Downtown
Improvement Project. I
Council took note of the communication. No action taken.
2. Anthony L. Andersen, U.S. Dept. of Interior - Dedication of Stillwater
Vlsltor Center.
Council noted this c mmunication.
ADJOURNMENT
Moti on by Council member Farrell, seconded by Council member Bodl ovi ck to
adjourn the meeting at 9f05 P.M. (All in favor).
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Resolutions:
No. 91-213 -
CITY CtERK
Directing Pfyment of Bills.
8
'\
lI!lI".
e
e
e
..
e
e
e
?
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
October 22, 1991
4:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim,
and Mayor Abrahamson
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Parks Supervisor Thomsen
Ice Arena Manager Bielenberg
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Others: Tim Schmolke, Kathy Cutler, Dan Shoepke, Liz
Kelly, Janelle Borden, Deb Junker, Chad Junker,
Richard Kilty, Wayne Wohlers, Mike Polehna, Alan
Liehr, Doug Hartman, Ken Meister, and Rob McGarry
WORKSHOP WITH SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council met with the Solid Waste Advisory Committee in a
workshop session to discuss the Solid Waste Management Plan
recently developed by the committee. Chairman Tim Schmolke
reviewed the plan with Council and discussed the committee's
goals and recommendations. Council concurred that a public
hearing should be held before final adoption of the plan.
Motion
Opheim
public
hearing
favor)
by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
to set Wednesday, December 4, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. for a
hearing on the Solid Waste.Management Plan, with the
to be televised on the local cable channel. (All in
Council directed City Attorney Magnuson to send a copy of the
Plan to Junker Sanitation and formally ask for their input.
(Council took a five-minute recess and reconvened at 7:00 p.m.)
WORKSHOP WITH PARK AND RECREATION BOARD
Council met with the Park and Recreation Board in a workshop
session to discuss the increase in the Ice Arena Rental fees
recently approved by the Council. Board Chairman Wayne
Wohlers stated that the Board had previously voted against
raising the Ice Arena rental fees because the Arena is self-
supporting without the increase. Finance Director Deblon
1
r,
-.
stillwater City Council
Special Meeting
October 22, 1991
e
noted that, with the five dollar per hour increase, there
will be a sholrtfall of $13,000 in the Arena budget for next
year. Withou~ the increase, the shortfall would be $22,000.
It was noted !that the Ice Arena's financial figures are kept
fr om October 11 to September 30, rather than on a calendar
year.
Motion by Councillmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to grant the Stilllwater School District ten hours use of the Ice
Arena at no charge, if needed, after the 160 purchased hours are
used. (All in favor)
!
Motion by Counci1member Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Farrell to direct the Ice Arena Manager to begin keeping his
cash-flow budget on a calendar year effective January 1, 1992.
(All in favor) I
i
I
!
(Council recessed at 7:45 to Executive Session and reconvened at
8:10 p.m.)
RECESSED ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN
L.I. 257, DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS
Mayor Abrahamson closed the Public Hearing.
Magnuson reported on the revised assessments
town propert iels:
ABS Co. I
Brick Allley
Dock Ca fel
Maple Island Plant Site
Maple Islland Prison Site
Citizens IState Bank
Stillwater Yacht Club
City Attorney
for the down-
e
$
37,500
47,067.01
20,910.03
41,491.81
51,000
50,000
100,000
Motion by Councillmember Bodlovick, seconded by
Farrell to ado~t the appropriate Resolution
assessments for tne parcels as listed in addition
which were agre~ld upon previously, for L.I.
Improvements. (Resolution No. 91-216)
Ayes - councilmem~ers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Counc i lmember
adopting the
to the parcels
257, Downtown
OTHER BUSINESS
i
Motion by councildember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to authorize the ~ublic Works Department to build 30 feet of new
sidewalk on North ,2nd Street. (All in favor) e
Motion by Counciilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
2
e
e
e
'"
1.
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 22, 1991
Funke to adopt the proclamation in recognition of school bus
drivers and National School Bus Safety Week. (All in favor)
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember
Bodlovick to cancel the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October
29, if Jim Junker is unavailable to meet with Council at that
time. (All in favor)
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to approve City Intern Glen Buzzell's employment through
November. (All in favor)
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m. (All in favor)
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
No. 91-216 - Adopting the assessments for L.I. 257-2, Downtown
Improvements
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretary
3
e
e
e
,
A
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
4:30 p.m.
October 22, 1991
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim,
and Mayor Abrahamson
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Parks Supervisor Thomsen
Ice Arena Manager Bielenberg
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Others: Tim Schmolke, Kathy Cutler, Dan Shoepke, Liz
Kelly, Janelle Borden, Deb Junker, Chad Junker,
Richard Kilty, Wayne Wohlers, Mike Polehna, Alan
Liehr, Doug Hartman, Ken Meister, and Rob McGarry
WORKSHOP WITH SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council met with the Solid Waste Advisory Committee in a
workshop session to discuss the Solid Waste Management Plan
recently developed by the committee. Chairman Tim Schmolke
reviewed the plan with Council and discussed the committee's
goals and recommendations. Council concurred that a public
hearing should be held before final adoption of the plan.
Motion
Opheim
public
hearing
favor)
by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
to set Wednesday, December 4, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. for a
hearing on the Solid Waste Management Plan, with the
to be televised on the local cable channel. (All in
Council directed City Attorney Magnuson to send a copy of the
Plan to Junker Sanitation and formally ask for their input.
(Council took a five-minute recess and reconvened at 7:00 p.m.)
WORKSHOP WITH PARK AND RECREATION BOARD
Council met with the Park and Recreation Board in a workshop
session to discuss the increase in the Ice Arena Rental fees
recently approved by the Council. Board Chairman Wayne
Wohlers stated that the Board had previously voted against
raising the Ice Arena rental fees because the Arena is self-
supporting without the increase. Finance Director Deblon
1
" ,
stillwater City Council
Special Meeting ~
October 22, 1991 .
noted that, with the five dollar per hour increase, there
will be a shortfall of $13,000 in the Arena budget for next
year. Without the increase, the shortfall would be $22,000.
It was noted that the Ice Arena's financial figures are kept
from October 11 to September 30, rather than on a calendar
year. I
!
Motion by councillmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke
to grant the Stilllwater School District ten hours use of the Ice
Arena at no charg~, if needed, after the 160 purchased hours are
used. (All in favor)
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Farrell to direct the Ice Arena Manager to begin keeping his
cash-flow budget on a calendar year effective January 1, 1992.
(All in favor)
!
(Council recessed lat 7:45 to Executive Session and reconvened at
!
8:10 p.m.) I
RECESSED ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN
L.I. 257, DOWNTO~ IMPROVEMENTS
Mayor Abraha~son closed the Public Hearing. City Attorney 4It
Magnuson repdrted on the revised assessments for the down-
town properties:
ABS Co. $ 37,500
Brick Al~ey 47,067.01
Dock Cafe 20,910.03
Maple Is~and Plant Site 41,491.81
Maple Is~and Prison Site 51,000
Citizens Istate Bank 50,000
Stillwater Yacht Club 100,000
Motion by Councillmember Bodlovick, seconded by
Farrell to adoQt the appropriate Resolution
assessments for tHe parcels as listed in addition
I
which were agreed upon previously, for L.I.
Improvements. (RjSOlution No. 91-216)
Ayes - Councilmemtiers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Counc i lmember
adopting the
to the parcels
257, Downtown
OTHER BUSINESS
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to authorize the 8ublic Works Department to build 30 feet of new
sidewalk on North 12nd Street. (All in favor) 4It
Motion by Counc lmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
2
e
e
e
...
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 22, 1991
Funke to adopt the proclamation in recognition of school bus
drivers and National School Bus Safety Week. (All in favor)
Motion by
Bodlovick to
29, if Jim
time. ( All in
Counci1member Funke, seconded by Counci1member
cancel the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October
Junker is unavailable to meet with Council at that
favor)
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to approve City Intern Glen Buzzell's employment through
November. (All in favor)
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Funke, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to adjourn the meeting at 8:35 p.m. (All in favor)
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
No. 91-216 - Adopting the assessments for L.I. 257-2, Downtown
Improvements
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretary
3
e
City ob
g tlQQwateh. uU l~U\egota
cP hocQamatlO"
WHEREAS, families are models for caring from birth through the aging years, for
celebrating and for renewal, and
WHEREAS, families provide direction for the future by nurturing values and
standards for excellence~ and
WHEREAS, families need support and attention in the daily miracles that they
perform, and
e
WHEREAS, Thanksgiving week is the traditional time to commemorate and observe
the important role of families in strengthening America.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, I, MAYOR WALLY ABRAHAMSON, do hereby proclaim
the week of November 25 through November 29, 1991 as:
FAMILY WEEK
in the city of Stillwater.
e
ft}4 .~
vUayoll
...
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/91-40
e
Planning Commission Meeting: August 12, 1991
Project Location: 1905-1983 South Greeley Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Business Park-Commercial
Zoni ng Di strict: BP-C
Applicant's Name: James M. Waters
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of a 100 square foot sign
with zero setback (fifteen feet req ired).
e
DISCUSSION:
The request is construct a twenty foot tall, eight foot one inch by twelve
foot pole sign on the front property line of the Greeley Square Development.
The Zoning Ordinance requires a fifteen foot setback from the front property
line which would put the sign in the parking lot. The street right-of-way in
front of the commercial center is wide, allowing an adequate street setback.
In review of the sign request, Staff recommends the height of the sign be
lowered to fourteen feet, the sign panel area be reduced to ten feet by eight
feet, and that 40% of the sign panel identify Greeley Center. The remaining
60%, or forty eight square feet could identify second floor tenants or special
center events.
The base of the sign should be landscaped to fill out the void between the
supports of the sign.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval with conditions.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The sign shall be fourteen feet in height with a ten feet by eight
feet sign area with 30% of the sign area naming the center. The
remaining 60% may name tenants as approved by the Community Development
Di rector.
2. The north driveway entrance from Greeley Street to the site shall be
closed off, new conforming curbing and landscaping construction and a
new driveway off of 61st Street constructed before this sign permit is
issued.
e
3. Landscaping consisting of bushes and flowers shall be planted around
the base of the sign to conceal the poles.
4. Only second story uses shall have signage on the pylon sign that do not
have other signage on the building.
5. Each retail use shall have their address plainly marked according to
City code.
ATTACHMENT:
Plannin~ Commission Action: Approved as conditioned.
CASE NUf1BER
'-~..v . W..'wU, _VJ-IL=-!LQ-
Fee Paid --~l:qQ------
Dote filed -1-?.lZL------
,-
T
""
PLANNING ADJVLINISTRATIVE FORl'vt
e
Street Location of Property; ___12.Q1_..:_J2~1_22~..!.t'_S;.!~~J~'y__S_t_L<:"<:"!..______
l I D '.' f P .t see attached
ogo oscflpil0l10 ropor y: ________________________________________
I
Owner: Na me _ _~:. ~~ ~~ ~+~S .t:~.:.:_~~.:~~.:..:.::---------------- ____________
,
. Address_~~:~_~~l~:~_:~~~~!___________ Phone:_!_:~~~:::_____
St. Louls Park, MN 55426 _
Ap'plicant (if other fhan ov)rer): Name ________]2p$Ji_~_._~a_~<:..r:..~t.J:.r:..~e.~:.!.y Manager
i '
Address_~2Z~-~~4~~!-2..!!~!1----------- Phone:_!_~~~:~~~_____
Type of Request:' ___ R~zoning ___ Approval o~ Preliminary Plat.
___ S~ocial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
X I " ,
'- --- Vrriance \ .:.__ Other ___________________
. . . I .. '
Description of Request: --.:r.o- ~ I I ()).\L...1lu-....e.r~..9.ll....9J__<!._~L&.'l.s.._s.2.!l~i.~!~!}.!
. with the 1:JJrrent Sign Ordinance, 'with no front. setback.
. ~ ,
, ~---------------------1-------~-----------------~-----------------
. . . I_~~____. .
... ----~----------------~J::~:~-:;-~~~-~::~:~-~~-~~~
Data of Public Haaring, -~k.d.:;;'1.:.--~:.-~~ ~ :.:.i::.----~~/_~L--
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and stru~\Y1l.on back 0 . rm or at-
tached, showing the foUowing: '\ ?-. 5 6 >
. ~.\ '0
1 North direction. ~ Jp (J 9
2. ~ ~~ ~
. Location ofl proposed structure on lot. r:;:: f>,\JC;\ J . >,
3. Dimensions jof front and side set-backs. :::!, ~\'V f'.1ff\ --J~
4. Dimensions I of proposed structure. ~,oII t""'~ c~::
5 St t c0 ..rJ 17' ,.~'1 c;.' -, ,"""-'
. ree narr.~s. ,p 01' ~t.\j't" :-_.
6. Locatio,n oil c:.dj,acent existing buildings. . ~. , ,'. ~t'!~. "v~y
7. Other miotation as may be requested. ~~<! f '. ./
I ~cu" ./
Approved ___ Denied ___ ~y tho 'Planning Commission on _____:~~~__ (du~e)
:~~~~C~:~_~h_a_::l~:~~:~_~r~::::~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
Approv~d ___ Denied ---Iby the Council on ________________ subiec~ to the
following conditions: -----r-~---;..------------------------------------- e
!
~~~~::~~:(~::-;t~~~-;~t;-----------------~-----------------~-~----
. . .
,
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH · STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
612-439,6058 Facsimile Machine 612-430-0472 .
Donald C. Wisniewski, P.E.
Director Public Works/County En9ineer
Mark L. Mattson,
Assistant Director Public Works
Richard D. Herold,
Design/Construction Engineer
John P. Perkovich,
Parks Director
Lawrence W. Bousquet,
Traffic and Maintenance Engineer
October 17, 1991
Lyle C. Doerr
Facility Manager
Mr. steve Russell
Community Development
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Director
RE: Northerly Entrance to Greeley Street Development
Dear Mr. Russell:
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the agreement between
Washington County and the developers of Greeley Square.
e
At this time, we are notifying the City that the first provision
of the agreement has not been met. Please make the necessary
contacts to complete this agreement.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
~~~
~ack Nelson
Traffic Services
IN:cr
Ene.
e
Printed on Recycled Paper
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
,
----
AGREEMENT
e
WHEREAS, GREELEY SQUARE PARTNERS, a Minnesota partnership,
is the owner of certain real property located in the County
of Washington, State of Minnesota, legally described on the
attached Exhibit Ai and
I
I . . .
WHEREAS, the COo/NTY .OF WASHINGTON, a body po11t1c and
corporate, is dtsirous of limiting the access from the real
property descri~ed in Exhibit A to Greeley Street, more
specfically the! driveway on the north part of the property
providing acces~ to Greeley Street.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, in' consideration of Washington County g1v1ng
their approval to the development of the property by GREELEY
SQUARE PARTNERS, the parties have agreed as follows:
1. That upon the construction and completion of proposed
GIst Stree~ bordering on the northerly boundary of the
real prope~ty described in Exhibit A attached hereto,
the northe~ly driveway access to Greeley street from
the real property described in Exhibit A shall be
closed and northerly access to the property shall be
provided by a driveway directly onto GIst Street.
2.
This in no way shall affect the remaining driveway
access frqm the real property described in Exhibit A
directly to Greeley Street, being the existing southerly
access to Greeley Street.
3. When the ~eal property described in Exhibit A is fully
developed, and when proposed GIst Street is completed,
the real property described in Exhibit A shall have
access along its westerly boundary near the southerly
boundary line directly onto Greeley Street, and shall
have direct access to GIst Street along its northerly
boundary line. The northerly direct access to Greeley
Street shall be closed and thereafter the property
shall hay. only one direct access to Greeley Street.
e
The foregoing ~onstitutes the full and complete agreement
between the pafties.
e
September 26, 1991
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
UEST
Development, Inc.
Enclosed is a copy of the redesigned signage for the
Square Shopping Center and a plan showing its new
location. The new location would still necessitate a
line setback, but would not encroach on the County rigt
I hope that this
e
Greeley
proposed
zero lot
of way.
scheduled for the October Planning
contact me should you need additional
like to meet with me to discuss this
COPY BY FAX
6524 Walker Street · Mirmeapolis, MN 55426 · (612) 920-9121
\.<_ _ e/-\II - 1'\
__.~=-- ~ - 11.
-
..-
@\%g@~~~' ::
m (~/@I~JJ~~~ :~'\
..--
~~~~ -fjVIt:~--" ~.
.
.
-
yz/
~ I
f)
J>..~n.' j-,'J<' j. /." j su-j! ;"-~
--
, . I
.,
t-<} ~ . .
. ,,&I . .
)--',. /.,.. ..,.,
;..... .'
., 'I.' . "
'"
,
.
\ r ' .,
" .
. , .
,,' "~.
, .
. -
... ....., t','
:' ?}.t- 0
. ~)
.:, .t. '" . if, e".
. fRt,K , t
,df( ,
-
'"
. '
\
. -:S:~-.
Yp,!l'!!.-KJ e~ b7'r.Ft4:..-c.
"1}'I.e/
5-C1, .
su ffQ'I-1f ' : \ .
"
, . '
..~ (.
:. .~ - y~y~~~(
,
.' . I
:. \
-,.
. .
, .
.,
. .
, "
..'t,"
(
.~
,
t
i-
\:.
~"
~
~
~
~
s-
"
___.-----J,,.,.....'
-- ----- -- ..,
\- :.~
y
.:-\
~:
~
~
~
)0.
'<.
\)
llo
"
~
~
~
~
);
~
~
"
"
~
~
~
ll,
~
(\
III
~
1
-v-
-1;>_.
-
1 ,
i:
'1
1 ~ -'
----
'J,~...
---
i'
\'
N
"
!'\
III
i~
\."
1::.
~
..
:......\i.
: .... .
.' .
. .'"
. . . '
. . . f
..,.,\'
" .
. .
. .. \',
....'~A'.:
.' ....
" . ;\
....,
.... ,I;
v't1!ii
" "
-----
~
;
~
!.
~
'll
~
.l
-.-
.-----
_ If --'-- ,- ,'-
--,
-;/1
-1~
.-\_ __-\ d .
, I) ---.......
i C. '
~ _c=- \,
";;:)
.~
.---.--
.\-
o
----'.
,;
. ~ t-'
---
",' I
""",'1',,'01
--
~
'"
"
~
~
--
I-
"
'"\
...
~
--...----.
I;)
l\
~
b
<',
~'\
)
'," 't' ".
, '-
". i', .fi/;7'f,....\L'
-I',
e
1
. ~: ::--..
'~.-
\ '" -~ ::....
""
, \
Cii
U \
or-- \
\
..
"
\
\
c:.
. J,
..
r
r
./
VI
VI
<IJ
o
to
"1l
. ,
:1 \
I '? %
I :t .J>.~
tl 0-
'i> ID-t
..... :....J>.
l'30
~, .
... :E t
~ \)
" "
\\: (J)
~
::0
fTl
fTl
~
\\
~ ~
()
0
C.
%
...
~- :
1::4'
"
~
..
,
~
.' -'
": :-.'. _ .:'; :. ~l'~ >>,4'" c'
",~,,""
. _ L----J . .', l.. -
'. . .
,,'. ,0 '.'.. .
, . , s;a,.,rror' .
. ,. .... t
, :,,:,n,J. '.
'. . "71',-rOS-Yf
'. .,..'
.6
,. A . . .
.' . .
. .. t"
,1- \.
,.J",.Jp '-'~is ~-~J -~
_J;.6'\9~ ~ :1/'1.1>'0 ~
\ --
, '1~".'i.1)
=
"0 )/'0' _L/Y3'Vt>~~Y~
~ - --------~---- -
.---";"----..-..'-
''', .
,
II
~..- -~~-
"
'"
x'
>;
t.
,
,..,,,,,. V ~"f
-,1. .
e
....,.
1'10V 04 '91 12: 42 LEROY SIGNS, INC.
P.2/2
~
I II
?J- I-.,.~
)1
I ~,'
., JL f/.tAA )! /tv
} 1..
C'
t
:f r~~:,. ~ .4> _;: :.:::.~ ~ . , ~-1
f@~~~[lj~u. .I:;;ijt~
' . . \ 1, 10
I .IOO~@UJJ~~~ .fiJriji
_ .i
,8#
t
-
c
.E
c
c
Q
........
",.-
ct
(l
E
c
c
-
ct
'5
LC
C\J
(Y)
(0
-'--G:...7:..;;";.;J..i4-.../r:..P-~.f!.1..S '.~~~':'" ::.-_,' .
i ~'
I.
I
10
~t
.,~ &'U~O;'~
1'-
11/
. ....,.-...'-- --'I ;
I'
i;
i
--~ "',.....,: i
I
I
!
_.~~- ~.... - I
I
J
7~::=
~~b/~~...
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
~ CASE NO. V/91-52
e
e
Planning Commission Meeting: October 14, 1991
Project Location: 14304 North 60th Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Industrial Park
Zoning District: Business Park Commercial, BP-C
Applicant's Name: Tires Plus
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The request is a variance to the Sign Ordinance for a pole sign and wall sign.
DISCUSS ION:
The business is located in the River Heights Auto Service Center. In March
1991 an overall sign program was approved for the site. At that time,
variances to the Sign Ordinance were approved to allow a pole sign and more
sign area for Big Wheel, ABRA, Kennedy and Tires Plus.
Tires Plus was allowed one sign totaling forty square feet of signage based on
the approved sign program for the building. Based on the r~arch review, three
signs were approved for Tires Plus of forty four square feet, thirteen square
feet, and twenty three square feet - totaling eighty square feet. Space on the
pylon sign, one hundred square feet, was available for the center generally.
Tires Plus did not get space on the sign.
The request before the City is for two signs (see proposed variance graphic).
One sign is a four foot by six foot wall sign on the \'/est wall of the
building. A second sign is either a separate eight by eight foot, sixty four
square foot, twenty foot high pole sign on a four foot by ten foot panel on
the existing pylon sign.
The letter of application indicates the reasons for the request. Pictures have
been submitted showing the view of the center from Highway 36. The reason for
not allowing signage on the west side of the building, is the residential
nature of Tuenge Drive to the north and the front entrances of the building
being to the east. Also, the Commission cannot look at this request in
isolation with considering other requests for west side sign locations.
The Sign Ordinance does not allow individual business pylon signs for
uses in the center. This would be a bad precedence. The additional signage on
the pylon is the least disruptive to existing signage.
If additional signage is allowed, it is recommended the signage be on the
existing pylon sign and that the size of tne panel be no larger than the ABRA
Auto Body panel.
e
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial of request.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Plans and letter o~ application.
!
,
PLANNING COMMISSION REdoMMENDATION: Approval with the following condition:
1. Approval of west side sign with removal of brand name can signs on
east side of the bulding. No additional signage on the pylon.
e
e
'.
e
CARDINAL
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
October 2, 1991
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Planning Department
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Sir:
re: Variance application for Tires Plus
Our client: Condura Marketing Corporation / Tires Plus
In accord with our conversation, enclosed is a completed variance
application and accompanying material requesting a variance to
allow additiqnal signs at Tires Plus, River Heights Service Center,
14304 North 60th in Stillwater.
e
After you have reviewed this application, I will be glad to answer
any questions and provide any additional material you may desire.
Please advise me of the time and date of the hearings we are to
attend so that I may block my calendar accordingly.
Thank
our consideration.
JMD:ms
Enc 1 :
cc: Donald M. Gullett
Irv Margolis
Patricia A. Weller
e
8609 Lyndale Avenue South # 1 0 1 B Bloomington, Minnesota 55420 (612) 881-5461
"
Coso Numbor!1~:.~~_
7tJ o~
Fee Paid _______________
Date filed _~13J.J.!.______
_CASE NUf4BER V/91- ::J-;J..;
PLANNING ADlv\INISTRATIVE FORi'v\
River Heights Service Center
Street Loco tion of Property: Jj].Q1Ji.o.rib_[Q.t..b.:._~tiJl~2.te.r..:_!:!~_2.?Q~~____..:.___
Logal Doscription, of Property: ________________________________________
Gusto Partners. C/O Marco Construction
Owner: Name _A_tj:~lltiPlI...:.__Ir.Y_~~r:.q"oJi~_....--______~_____----___________
3460 North Lexington Avenue, Suite #307
Address _j!!~~~vj~:!:~_M!l__~~12.2____________ Phone: L~111_~~~2~___
Ap'plicant (if other than oWj1er): Name S~!!.<!.U!2_~~!~~~I2.9..~~r:e.<?:~a.!.:!~~~!!:~!.~s
701 Ladybird Lane
Address _].!Jrtl.~vjJl~~....Mlt.2~3]l__________ P hone: i.~1.21_~2.i-..?1.QQ___
Typo of Request:
___ -Rezoning
_'__ Spacial Use Permit
X V .
___ anance
___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
, .
-__ Approval of Final Plat
\
___ Other___________________
Des~ription of Request: ]2_.1!2~..e2~~J>..e!'~.1!!.ej_~:!.~~_!~_~J2~_~4..:~2~!!.~~_~~_~s t
side of building and either a 41 x 10' Tires Plus addition at bottom of existing
4If.-----------------------------~-----------------------------------
pylon or a new pylon for Tires Plus at the southwest corner of the site.
----------------------------------------~~~~orpora~ .
. Signature of Applicant: __ _ ___~_~____
-- n Donald M. Gu e t, Sr.
Data of Public Hearing: ______________________________________~___~_._..
NOTE: Sketch of proposed 'property and structure to be dra-"yn.on back of this.-ip~~"-
tached, showing the following: L-{"\ <e.; '.:J ~I " 9 ~
. ~\/~ ~
1. North direction. [13/ f.~ 0.0..\ ~
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. tt (\\.':\\Z9 ~~ ~
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs. r.~ v;~~ ~~~ ~
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. ~ ol'of&~~~~ · 0.::::-
5 St t ,,- .~..)d.~.~.N..{."'Yv.,
. ree names. \;: O~\-'f':J'\.....~~~1;. '"
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings. '~~h ;J' .f '1 ~*"~
7. Other information. as may be requested. . ~.c::~~' ~p/
Approved ___ Denied _~_ by tho 'Planning Commission on ___________ (dota)
subiect to the following conditions: ____________________________________
----------------------~-------------------------------------------
.ppro~ed --- .D.enied ___ by the Council on ________________ subiect to the
. allowIng condItIons: _______________________________________"________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use other side)
e
I'
~ V
m~
~.s
!l. 0
<S~
.
.e
. !
~
o
'tJ
-f.
a
i2
N
~. ~~~
r
~
I
.,.; .
~ m
~j
, 0
".l:.
~~.
~~
:',.~~
<::s
~
'l'-
...!:f-'
. z:'
f
~
-n
. '.
:II
~ "~~~
ir~
- -."".
o
'tJ
-f
-
o
i2
~
\ \
~ ] ~_~_I
~ ~ \l ---r
_ I .
~ \l
~ -
~
m
..-
~
-~
~
z:
~ 11'
~ 11
W~r
~ ;~\d
~ -t'
"'C
c:
X1
"'C
o
tn
m
C
~
X1
-
]::I
2
n
m
X1
m
D
c:
m
tn
-t
----
"- "\. l~
-t
55
'" ~
'0,
'~~, ~
.'
"
...
o
...
>
,..
'"
c
;=
o
Z
Q
-
'$
'"
~
....
.~
()
.~
........ ........
I
. I I
i".:- -'," .Tl,,-
:, --1. I'
'{ ........,.....'\., ".
I', ~ "
i "'......l" ....
: I,~,
! I ~",
i .......-{ 1\"
I :....... . I' I ,
.--! I \
i J I ,~
L-----j
\j\ II
:4J.... ~/--
l~ ..~J ~ (-
\ ; \ \ ~\ \ \
i " " ~ \ \ \ {
~:j! ! ~,5)l:
fit ,-jJ J :
. ~f \ il'l I
I .... .... I H .. ",r I. I
. . 0., ...., V . r i\ ......... / /
.t::A:....--.:._._...._.._.......~.~ -:!h'';:4:.~'- ..'=111>< . ! '_-1 /'
, , ;;. _ ~ :-. .' :;" -;1~....\. '{ , ~ ~ - /~..
., ;;. ;;. '",;:;\~"" ~ I . l /// ...,~Sblt :---'"
,...... "\. I /1 ". . ~
" \i r 1 I , Q"'" '..
;; I I.
~ k,'.'
I: r:
.0 ii
~_...- ..
I
I
I
I
1-___ ,
\ \.
e M
(""
I c-
c::::.
.;r.
- - _..- -- .-- --- @
-i
I ~ :t
~. ~ ~ t
m
r I
r1J :t. ", -t X
s:;
~ m ~ -
~ !'i " r en
~ ,- m "'~\ '0 -t
0 r-
? c ~ ~ -
'-:I . 2
~~(O "" '\-,'
N ~
<~ IJ' 03::l C5 -1 Ci)
~ ...n Z. PJ 1>
~ ~
;l , . ~ m
~ ~. ~. ~ "'C
\1' '" . "'C
I ~:f
~ ~ .... 6 ~ :c
>~ .
:! F- ~Fa' ~ 0
1"3: 5 .:::
..~ lU ~ m
~ >,. C
~~.
"C
r-
.. i i 1>
~ ~ ~ 2
~ '" P
1: l'"
~ ~~ . .'
9/0
, "
. / I I ../
\ I I I ,/'"
j-./ ....//-- -
I I' ..
__ - L--f- . ..i-!! ---tL~--r
f i I I \ '
. I I..' ,\, \
,_, _ I. J ., ' '
I " / " ,__,--::t.
" / ......................~.r".~<.
..............,............. , ,.---
I 9~
\ \ --~----
\ \. -------
--- --'
" -"''''_---- __".,,- I
~.... .--::;- /-;.:::::;- - ,," "
--/ -,,,,~
-!-- .1'~ '\ ~ "",.....
__ I ) "\ \\\
\ ,."'__ __ .I J. t
-..:./ _/~ I'
,..,------ ' ,
... "'----,. ~. ,
- - .......~.......................~ .... /
.........' .
.
. ". ~ r
I ~/
. . I l)~~~1 - - IGf>'-::'-
. \-- ---~--
.
..
......
\ \.
. \
.......
....
'''~a
-
"
\
0...0'0
I
--...
-
/ bOte.. c
...1---
....------'
e
\
,
\
L--
\
\
---
-.---
\.
\
....
---_/
----- - .-,- .-.---....-
----
0" p..L BU\LO\NG AREP-
~.
,..."
1. '3."..v I D -..:...r:
e.
e
e
e
"
M E M 0
To: City Council - City of Stillwater
Planning Commission - City of Stillwater
From: Condura Marketing Corporation / Tires Plus
re: Variance request for Tires Plus at River Heights Service Center
14304 North 60th
Date: October 1, 1991
This memo is to explain our request for a variance from the sign
requirements imposed on Tires Plus/River Heights Service Center.
As you are aware, you have previous 1 y approved the current 1 y
existing sign plan which allows Tires Plus to use 24" individual
channel letters on the south face of the building, 18" over the
entrance on the east face and their tire brand logos over the bay
doors on the east face.
After meeting with your staff and securing your approval for that
plan, we have operated with it for the approximately six months we
have been open for business at River Heights Service Center.
Unfortunately the sign plan as allowed has not worked as planned.
Immediately after opening we began to receive comments that
customers could not easi ly find us or had driven by many times
before they could locate our store. For a period of time we
collected the signatures of customers who advised us they had a
problem finding the store. Copies of those signatures accompany
this application.
We are now asking that you grant a variance to allow the following
changes:
1) 24" i nd i vi dua 1 channe 1 1 etters on the west side of the
building at the southwest corner
2) Either a 4' x 10' addition at the bottom of the existing
pylon or an additional pylon at the southwest corner of the
site
All of these plans are shown, as well as the existing sign plans,
in exhibits accompanying this application.
We would like to bring several points to your attention
feel are unique to this particular situation and
reasonable, in the public interest, and not detrimental
our request.
which we
make it
to grant
f. ,) .
Page 2 - Memo - City of Stillwater - October 1, 1991
As you will note in the accompanying photos, or if you visit the
site, due to the topography of the site and its relation to the
highway it is very difficult to see Tires Plus or any of its signs,
particularly when coming from the west. You will note that the
west side of the building, where signs are not allowed, is visible.
Photos were taken from west and east of Greeley and from points
across from the site.
The bu i 1 ding 1 ayout, e 1 evat i on and des i gn were affected by the
existing topography of the site and this has adversely affected its
visibility.
The traff icon Highway 36, as you are obv i ous 1 y qu i te aware, is
extremely heavy and traveling at a relatively high speed, 50 miles
per hour, which makes it very dangerous for drivers to be looking
around trying to find the Tires Plus signs. Because of Tires Plus
extensive marketing programs they draw many people from surrounding
areas who may not be as familiar with the immediate area further
compounding the problem. On the ether hand, this drawing effect of
Tires Plus is a benefit to other businesses in the community, as it
is well known that once stopping in the area customers tend to also
visit other establishments or attractions.
While an auto service center such as River Heights'is great from a
city land use perspective as it avoids a series of individual,
smaller, free standing businesses monopolizing your highway
frontage, it does not operate with the same synergy as a shopping
center. Customers do not come to one business and then shop others
while they are there or simply come to the center to shop as with
a normal retail shopping center. There is a certain limited
benefit as people realize this is a location for auto services, but
the majority of the customers sti 11 come to visit a particular
enterprise and so visibility of the signs is very important.
The existing west elevation of the building is bare except for the
bay doors and some subtle differences in the block designs.
Therefore it is very difficult for the public to realize that it is
an auto serv ice center. Su i tab 1 e signs wou 1 d he 1 p i dent i fy the
center, add color, and likely result in a more pleasing appearance
to help support the retail business nature of the area. Currently
the west side of the building looks industrial in nature.
We certainly recognize and respect your City's need to control
signage so that your commercial areas are not just a total array of
obnox i ous b 1 ink i ng neon. We do fee 1 that our request is a
reasonable compromise that can meet the City's objectives whi le
still allowing a successful retailing environment for Tires Plus.
We therefore respectfully request your approval.
e
)'. '..
: ;fJ(!Nj)JnJ 6tALI4Jr-R-
. ,fjrL0vd-er-
~ ~LP US TO HELP YOU!
H yo~ ha~ dIfflcuJty In selg ~d locamig dur store, please lillln your name, address, and
phone number below. We rqel tha~ to best serve you, at our Stillwater location, your being
able to easily find us is imp~rtam.We.are_requestirtg a pylon sign for our store. Your
assistance is appreciated. r. ank y~u.... '
N~ AO~RESS ~
'Elltn..... (!M.7'FIL .,...", /J11i?/)~6'J"P'lJ19 '57'; ~ St:.:tL')- 9!!!~C')
~?d b 7: fA U _ v- I 2;;. t/ 1111'1 ,'" c,+ f..()() -ISr..1
~ "i:. 'KAla 1\.Qev-- I f}., D/7 . Uc.A.vT'loJ-' _ ~4 'W -ern
im ~~~r L~ 7~ h<. ~~~ N l.1 'J) -31~ 7
i' I ,..t~ . ! 1.4"],^ ~.J.k"" ~ - _I ,f-r a.:-. :q- -, 77, ~ '
,} {f' --.a. ,.,a ~Jl'" L'~ - riJl"n:- 11 f/I'J _ "!'~J"L c ~
,..IM ." M~-M !'.("\rltlo, -rU/j ~ ~7. (,.,1~- ~447
.;.: A. ..~ :;f .~ .J 13/a" ~. .~ r;'~. ~~'1"": 73ft9
...: f/Z. '.az.._ /J.,., I:l_... 'II" <A~j~-e..o~~
Pl~ ~- r~"",,) f4/'~ IX LA uJIA/lJ~. ill: ""Jr-:7Jf'.4j:~~
"'~,/ ~I ,. t ~ I i '~~I ~'k.tnJ u~', pI....... -- / 4~ '-:1/~. 7~~~ (,.-<"'3
~ ~iiI ". .A',,.... I ~ ' -';"7/C, rJ.,f"h/. At/ 'iff <J./ ~.J,.t/. "j~,,^ -- . j
~ ...n iJ ~ , ~~. AJ+. ~ ~ -':?1. ,~~/... . - , ~;":d 7l M "i 7 -I (. ~
-I ~~. I~'f tHduv /f-brt j!."J1f'u/A. /' n~ -tf~ '1
r.. I _ c---;< r '014"c9 J.u t uwoc..rl1- tn~. 7..<"1/
'L~....~_ }t:".A.. l JJ.~S" 1/../ 1 tlJ~~/"J
." 6. fI ,.J.r~--1~,.,,~ '* ". ".. ~ .... :'h U~40~2.
I A 6 R P I IAI. ", , ./1 "N-: ',.k\:1t.,.. '/l'JA. 4..:~q-4b~~:..
~-~, . J (k) 1'3. '-f -, ~ ""' ......~~ hI?". L( 'l:1c.) -< ~~4
_ .Y!t /VU'~" k. 1/'." -tA. I I III 1\ L.::" iYlA..l ~'t' M ll\J<::'b I. .;701/ MV\ 4:Z~~ -/)02,7
E #~ L ./. ~ P<'1F:~ ::s b ij No IZ... J..;' I. A- ,,;d ~ 3 cr-~ , 0 d
--0_ '" / / . +- I. ~y'y(CI.:./1.. ~ ~ ~ .JArlS}_/~ L ~ I
F r.A "',IA.~'- fl:..:. .. I I I j'JltJS 7(,,/rW(V k. =#-1 h~"1t JlJI !'flt2 ''P- Z If(}(1
p' (/,./7 01(,/ $. ~sa;fL ::r;-: ~9r'?3/C)
,,:./: ""' J ~ / -' of /_ ~ ~ &, RL /'T). ",/j t:. h All1llJd t 1f.:I /AlJ' 7 /(":./':. ~'I' 1"1 Y
/..;,1.1 ~. j..-t.L"fjj 'I()~'O t1",~r""y t:JdP l 'I<:?-~~q4
Ctt:P ....::.L...o,... 1./0<:; S < j,~, J-'6. I ~ ~ . 'q?Crg;;d,~
r 1'.), ~'c!. c';;d,b-,O r q~ q S .<; & 41',. M,,, -< +:f:. A- &r"?c> "~7'
';.., t1.,,,,, ('t.o'll { ~_,. ~)l:J ", lL C1"(...LJ f1....~ A. } L./"lC/ .. 'j:l Ie-;L
~'.-IV) ~~ I . ~9~ &:5":?p!? f>/,,./V 7':7?...;>I..tti::<...
,J Jt..j~h "1/ C:;t,/ '7nfJ J40<(' 1- 7J:'~-,,)C/7- ~/~3
~ -- ~~ I C:Y~4) .l"t"..lt"O'11' ~dlJ "'~ .:1.0" ~"b.~"'74.q
t:..... M\ to..,,\. " (l.Y'\.J\ ,) -':.....\0 \ 0\1:1- 4.~":o1<'
if'" . U~"'" Il. <.::' J ~N ~ "- it ~ 1'1. ~ _'I:\q d. 4;jJ
. ".--..//1,( /J J/.t4"~.AI' _ ! 2~ :;, :::r;JIJ/~~i1/L 'If 'v/ / ~ -f b
(,' {J l..'-'~ Z.~('7 ~~ ~"Q ~ lfSt~!ol
5~~ ~\- -."\.. - i \.\. \~
c.... ,
..
e
': ~W.;.:.:;...,..
e
'.
e
/
I
\
'\
z. 0 d
ZS:60 1661'n090
~3l~MllI1S 'dOl wo~~
FROM T.P. STILLW~TER
06,26.1991 09:49
P, 1
\,..
:..
, .
_ -Vbc:1JO- ..(8<e, tSU...j (1 "\I'-"~ \~ VV~A 'f\ ..f S ~i- 6 (II ,0 7 ,.vI V""" \.
-L.'j-'lh ' 7 Y'~I v,/ zs ~oi'l7 ~V:'1(7 rtp __~/ elf' -r "'1"" _(./ t1'/f v7~
\>el" ~"-"?cc:.;., , Z71/ dZ ,.,. VI ~ f' '(j L'(.''W. \A r'?"V4 7~l? ~ .1-=.1\'
l.~/)~~..$L. "~JzJ...s. (V Uf .::rv"-tI?'/ dY?f/ ,hl""(7t7 Lz~~. ~'t;J 'T '~::;?
I P//-t68 tress- . (1f1V. 1J11gr(J?1J/W4 -RlY};/ ",?J1oV pr '/
F98t-''1En -rj,(2~..s ..NI-^I 01M"'7-3'7 't'"IIQr,tv.v;"lr? '1'j;~ . tlr y-,lr'tH'cl5 - /
t#"/1-JT!;t ~h' '.....f~1I :> oAf ~:..{:> ':/J; ;~,~ Ij 0;'" . ~t ...
t..>'lQ..'-~ & -.J.7f~L-'J ;:[fl1 -1-'-" - ~ ''is ~(...e 'I~* ,~ ~r , ~.. . ~
~I~-t~>l(, \J'toInL C". ~l ..,) ~~\,;~ ~/,., ~ 17 ~~~(....... ~"''', )
~7!f'..s...SZI? frY! ;::J (1 or ~r.J1)J :?j,0)1l'7 'TT ,FIP Tf IJ:. ~
f.? ~/-z:?k "-:?{ W ~f\(7~~ ".,tlo/\ "7 '.Al ~/\O"";J oft: 'lU/~? /r./:!...f:>'1 ;?c.., r.. "... OJ
,.!'--?v - rpj "l 'Tr' t7,..",..... e/lI}"'Y I tlJi Vlj#tt {(,) /,U ~
~(IJ)- ,F.f, ..... ~~'7(V111 L.,,"~ v;-vf/ ~ (Y 'r:. Q~Hli --Qd,/l)J~ '--II )
~l Ill.;; -"'VVUVI ~ iJ . ct<rrlt;{/\ v'n~:J VA-;JmJ'~ 0-'2" V',..1
" 7~ t'l1!' u - Uh "# w'1r:l:.J/1"f11,'J..S''V' 1".JY ,~....., ,'f -- ''\,r] Q E4)f " ~ l1f ~~ . /; ~ ./ ~, ,
<! IIQIt:-I,-(h fV/1! 7 F/ rn ~ """7 ~ J.J.J!I'/ t:.f:~s: ~ :;l, fAl "- ".' en
S.U\'/;~li NH' po._ ~'"'., '(V Jl/W/ ',.,. .. ~3: aA7trtr!?~) V'L/
b / QS - 11( ,. ,., ~ 71/, N,,,-n'J1"l..; ';;bt.L.y^ 1.\1 ~ I ~{)~iI<a/lYlQ O'rtt\l .
QOr.S-b~5 .~.(I) Cl'4t,.v tJ ~t. f Ho'~ '" <a.. \ (Tfl( ~\\ Yl::ll..~ \l ';1 -"\\' ~ ':1
~V~~41 it I'M 'rUT. ~I '~t+I ~~/ V/i~/ 'V/j v~ n''''~
ce:~~)- '0 .'~ 'N W '",,"" "q r"..1 ~ -- .A -,y '"tQiJ' ' ~ v ,~:\
(7 7 f:. I -.t, Jt --;"1 Ir:..Lcf v "11\ '1" (f ''''FE V ~ h ,N-y:r"it ~ 3.J.f;)/ tv 'fII1.1
06 <:>,- fZ/1 ('IH ,...J..f"7~'f?Ha>(/y ..;4Ii.....l ? ~ t/-11 "" / (, V1J" " , ~~kl
/ CX?C'-6e:f? .', P' '0 -c;.I v .....V ~'~l:1 Y .v,",," .:7'"
L~~/-OZf7 ~f IVI -rJM -';Ifl/ 17ll1,,,,!'r.fl I h~;;i f.('I I 7"'" (~~ V<J;./
L 'laB -6V~ ;v~ '(V~Yl1~'> ;/../ .2.~~~~'" -- ' '~~ 7J'J"
~~b5-t.-n~ -4-' .,;;> 'VQ ..';') F9h '''''_.\. ~~
G\'-c::5$- ~ ~~<::'I"C\.'\',~ 'S:.~~':\"'\"'~~"2i. "\~. ~'...,. -.-.
'"
#4
.. 'J 0,1
~fI\~ . ~ .",
. ssa~aaV
I I
rl1' "t#-~ .' - \ 'nOA 'JU'e~' "~~'BJ:>~Jdd'B SF g:>U'B~sJSS'B
t.Jno^" '~JO~S tn~4!s uOIAd 'B 8tIps:mb~1 ~.re ~N1 .~trelJ9 tII! sJ sn pug AI!S'B~ o~ ~lqB
~UJ~q Jno1''ao11601 J~~'BA\rms !nO ~e 'nOA ~A1QS ~SQq o~ ~'Bq~ I~Q QM, 'A\OIQq JQqmnu Quoqd
:~t1pPU '~1Il\lU mo.< UJ ug,;ld 'roots me 8up1!:lo[ ptm T~s UJ ~(l1:lWlP ~ no.< JI
I. " mOA. cfllO:l OJ. SIl dj II> .
~?) 7~9 7107JJ.~ · :. ~
~.
,
..
!&...
, .
.... lJ-t'
...
"',,- .
............~.j1~..
e
e
e
~
..
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/91-54
Planning Commission Meeting: October 14, 1991
Project Location: 125 South Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning District: CBD
Owner's Name: James Granger and Kathleen Granger
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description:
A Special Use Permit for a residential use on the second level of a commercial
structure.
Discussion
The request is to convert the second level of a commercial building into
one residential unit. This use was being conducted without City approval
until the City was notified. Building and fire inspections were made on
September 24, 1991 and the tenant removed due to the numerous heal th/safety
violations in the building. The owners have been issued a list of these
deficiencies and are aware the building must be brought up to code(refer to
letter from Fire Chief Seim dated October 2, 1991) before occupancy.
A residential use on the second story is a compatible use to the commercial
use on the first level of this building. Residential units occupancy much of
the second stories in the downtown and Special Use Permits have been granted
in these cases in the past. The applicants have stated they will be using the
rear entrance on Water Street for access to the Duilding; according to the
Uniform Building Code, the rear entrance will have to be modified in order to
accommodate the use. (Refer to No.3 of the memo from Chief Seim.) No parking
is provided on site for the use. One or two spaces are required, dependent on
the size of the unit. Parking is available in permit parking lots.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All building and fire code requirements must be met as per Department
of Public Safety comments which include the following:
a. Wiring in this area and for this area was not installed properly
wittl heavy reliance on extension cords substituted for permanent
wiring, This is a violation of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code.
Article 85 and the Electrical Code.
b. No egress windows in sleeping areas. This violates Minnesota
Uniform Building~ Minnesota Uniform Fire Code and the N.F .P.A. 101
Life Safety Code.
c. Main exiting from second floor goes through two (2) rooms, this
violates the Uniform Building Code. the Uniform Building Code
allows exiting through only on additional room.
d. Walls of the apartment area do not provide proper separation. One
(1) hour separation is required in this situation. This violates
the Uniform Building Code.
Plan Review - Case No. SUP/91-54
Continued
i
e. Apartment do~r has to be twenty (20) minute rated and properly
installed perlthe Uniform Building Code.
f. Smoke detectors installed per the Uniform Building Code. As tnis is
a new situation, the Code requires the detectors have to be hard
wired.
g. Proper light ~nd ventilation per Uniform Building Code.
I
h. Proper rise ~nd run on stairway and handrail on stairway per the
Uniform Build~ng Code,
!
i. The City of $tilh'/ater has adopted Appendix Chapter 38 pertaining
to sprinkler systems. This document is more restrictive than the
Uniform Buil~ing Code. This building may be affected by the change
of occupancy 1hat has taken place. This could mean the building
would have b, to sprinkled. The Building Official has the sole
authority fo~ interpretation of this law and I will certainly
accept any ruling he makes.
..
~
e
j. Plumbing per the Uniform Plumbing Code. Any plumbing that has been
done, or that will be done, has to be inspected by the Buil ding A
Department. _
2. There shall be no on-street parking for the use, Parking is allowed in
designated lots wiith a parking permit,
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighbornood or otherwise
detrimental to the publ c welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance once all building and fire code violations
have been corrected.
APPLICATIONS:
- Application form, oJtline of request.
- Letter to Jim Granger, dated October 2, 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned.
I
!
e
'\1" J.VU "
f .
Caso Numbor '1!!:!t.---
1o-Q9
Fee Paid -------:-7----
Da;e Filed -(~h/$-!.---
CAS E N U t~ B E R 11/" !J1L-
PLANNING ADlvdNISTRATIVE FORl'v\
Street location of Properly' __!.2,..s._~_J:/Jj{Lf,.z---",-------------------. -
P't C'': t"t; 4,/ dLoe-..e':l.-7 Of O/"9/1'LtZL /otLln.-
Logol Doscription of Proporty~ {i1.a.t&....fj!-JLlae_.:ld~.h..<<:~:!.f!P--_---/IL{1e.t.i!.I/6f/~ sf3(!}
Owner: Name _J;. (U:n.<;.s__t:.~_____tk1.blfi'.b__l1___GLl!.!:]1_~t"_____
Address ~JlLJ~.JJ!lt1JJb_-S.t.__SJ~JL~(k. Phone: ___'i;J$.:}j:r~-
Ap'plicant (if other than oW]1er): Name ---------------------------------
Address______________________________ Phone:_______________
Type of Request:' ___ Rozoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
_~ Spocial Use Permit ___ Approval of Final Plat
___ Variance ~__ Other ~_______________'___
D '.~ .!.R .. \'~ C"oYlsl'rLlcT ()u....lJ1.fr J.:L~n:). ~~)
escnpllon o. eques.. ------------------------------------- --'--71 --- t ')
. !;lL~'c.t.ft5___0_(J__2_~~~_i.e!!_d::__ _OJL:R.(]9LE.J.1,tJ!Ji._!i.Tt.q(I!f!:..e.- "2.. ~ IL
" .' --~~~~~---~~~---~~g~---------- -----------------~------
I 0 //. ~
S. t : A I' J.. i ,'1ibJ.. J:t~ ~11-/-' <
Igno ure 01 pp Ican... ~---...:r..c;:-T.-----------
Date of Public Hearing: _________~_________~ ------------------------
NOTE: Sketch of proposed property and structure to be drawn.on back of this rorlfLOl"_at-
tached, showing the following: ' . d. ,(f~'! ," It]7;~
. . ;:" 1.:>
1. North direction,(' ~ _. ~, .t},~~-'.
2. L~catio~ of proposed stru?ture o~ lot. ' L_ 'f;: ,(:~~. .'f.~? ;?
3, D~mens~o~s of. front an~ sIde set-oacks. ts; c.{) - .p ~{f' h.
4, DlmenslOns 01 proposea structure. tf?,.~.... '~~ !<~~~....~\'" iII..'J.~:
5. Street names. \'"' ... O.~Y,,'t' ry <'
6. Locatio,n of adj.acent existing buildings. . V:\.. 0.'" 0' ". t' AJ\~
7. Other mfonnation as may be requested. . '<~(';'j'"~LV'.-~,,)
,,::,,07G7.('.Y
Approved ___ Denied __._ by tho 'Pl~nning Commission on ---------~=.'-r u;e)
sub. ~.. tli f II' d' . ,
lee..o Ie, 0 owmg con It Ions: ____________________________________
----------------------~-------------------------------------------
e Approved --- Denied --- by the Council on ________________ subiect to the
- II' d''''' \
to oWing con Illons: __________:.._____________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Comments: (U~e other side!,
".
Fo/Unvt 7Aomp/.Jon fltJl/JaA~
125 Sotdh. /fhin. St.!, St.i..Ll.wai:.vt
Lot /.J.i..P! - /20 x .~5
/Vo taAemeni:/.J i
,11 . ni. 1 . 11' I
najace OUL.w..uw.r4
70 ih.e. No /l.i:h. i
/naAon.i..c ILod9-~ BLd~
C eni.Jw..L IBo.n.k
I
70 ih.e. (PAt
floo.Le~ ,- Cub O~P-Ce4j (aCIW/.J/.J t.jai:.e/L StAeet)
70 ih.e Sotdh. ·
:;. l~ LMki.J-uJ
S t.i..L/JJJcq e/L Bah. ~/L!f
Up/.Jtai..JuJ /Le4li1ence /.Je./Lv.i..ced b!f /LeaA e.nhumce on l/ai:.e/L 5to
IIpp/Loxi.mai:.e.l!f IUJJ /.J~u<1/l.e led - 2nd. level lac.i.n.r;~ waie/L St. i.o taAt
jhd~.i.n.r;
I
/ - veh..i..c.Le. I
[venm9/.J - RIve/L Lot, Soui.h.. olll!ulbi!ll/L!f Y)oi.n.:t..
C.i!-ff lot, No/l.i:h. 01 Supe/L flme/l.i..ca
I
,
. ,
e
e
e
..
~
-
GORDON SEIM
FIRE CHIEF
_DAVID MAWHORTER
BLlC SAFETY DIRECTOR
POLICE CHIEF
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
DIVISION OF FIRE
October 2, 1991
Jim Granger
314 East Marsh Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Inspection Number: 91090301
Dear Jim:
On September 24, 1991 at 10:10 a.m., the building official, state electrical
inspectors, a police officer and myself made an inspection of an area of the
second floor (used as an apartment) at 125 South Main Street in the City of
Stillwater. We made this inspection based on a complaint that persons were
living in this area without the required permits and inspections. We found the
following deficiencies:
-e
1.
Wiring in this area and for this area was not installed properly with
heavy reliance on extension cords substituted for permanent wiring.
This is a violation of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, Article 85
and the Electrical Code.
2. No egress windows in sleeping areas. This violates Minnesota Uniform
Building, Minnesota Uniform Fire Code and the N.F.P.A. 101 Life
Safety Code.
3. Main exiting system from second floor goes through two (2) rooms,
this violates the Uniform Building Code. The Uniform Building Code
allows exiting through only one additional room.
4. Walls of the apartment area do not provide proper separation. One
(1) hour separation is required in this situation. This violates
the Uniform Building Code.
5. Apartment door has to be twenty (20) minute rated and properly
installed per the Uniform Building Code.
6. Smoke detectors installed per the Uniform Building Code. As this
is a new situation, the code requires that the detectors have to be
hard wired.
e
7.
8.
Proper light and ventilation per the Uniform Building Code.
P',u-
Proper '~e and run on stairway and handrail. on stairway per the
Uniform Building Code.
I'arm 2091 D,Sk STWI
212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Police Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336
Fire Phone: 612-439-6120
Jim Granger
October 2, 1991
Page Two
9.
The city of Stillwater has adopted Appendix Chapter 38 pertaining
to sprinkler isystems.This document is more restrictive than the
Uniform Build~ng Code. This building may be affected by the change
of occupancy. that has taken place. This could mean the building
would have to be sprinkled. The building official has the sole
authority fori interpretation of this law and I will certainly accept
any ruling hel makes.
PL& Cj'~
Plumbing per the Uniform Mcch3-Ilical Code. Any plumbing that has been
done or that will be done has to be inspected by the building
department.
10.
I
The above listed items w~ll have to be taken care of before any special use
permits will be granted p~rtaining to R-3 occupancy of this area.
!
To best resolve this sit~ation, a plan should be submitted to the Stillwater
building official. This ~lan should contciin dimensions and specific information
pertaining to sleeping arra egress, exiting system and wall construction, etc.
If you need further infor$ation or have any questions concerning the code items
listed above, please calli me at 439-6120.
S7;:,~ ~~
Gordon Seim, Chief
Stillwater Fire Department
..
e
e
e
r illwater
~ -~
---- -
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA i)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th '
Stillwater, Minnesota ~illat t~e Clty Council of the City of
at 7:00 P.M, in the Counci mee on Tuesd~y, November 5, 1991
Special Use Permit request f~rc~ambe~~ of ~lty Hall to consider a
level of a commercial ~ reSl entlal use on the second
CBD, Central Business ~{~~~{ure at 125 South Main Street in the
Applicants. Case No. SUP/91_54.ct. James and Kathleen Granger,
A~l persons wishing to be heard with
wlll be heard at this meeting, reference to this request
Mary Lou Johnson
City C 1 e rk
Publish:
I () .. :;'0 /' 9 (
e
-r JVlv.s-P () /3 -U ;: 0/ 1):5 -r 1/ /5 J .s
,t( /VON~ ucrNPO~K) /1116 USfr'
Rir51LJlrlv7/AL PlYfCkJNG W"UtJ.) J-IUR/
-r /-1 c c: 0 In In ~ ~ C 1111- P t1? 0 ~ t?l?:T / c: 0 \
P /U, Ie. )IV G I :5 Il v' cn?, 'I B J .; f' fi.. I:d!. ). E In
/Y /VD ~e5ID~'-/N-r).,fL C7'1,es PL U5 /Hc/I\
V / :5 )( Od<... S W 0 V 1-0 7/J 1< E UP.5 ,P~ c:...Z"S
ovER.. 1-oW6 P.J2'~)f:>D'5 OF -rlm~
No-r I!I--LOW;NG FOR. --juRAl 01/;:-" OF
5Pfl0E:~ POR.. BU.5JNE65 GU.510>nEP..;;
CITY~~STtW~~082 p:::::g-6d /06 VII/Ie
~ ;;2J ~ ) ,IS.. ;n ~S'-j , J
qd..~ ~4'200 (~
. "
October 9, 1991
II
City Council
City of Stillwater
City Hall
Stillwater, Mn 55082
re: Case No SUP/91-54
Honorable Councilmemb~rs:
I am unable to attend th~ public hearing on the above referenced case, but I wish the
following statement to be Iplaced in the record on my behalf,
i
My wife and I are the owners of the property located at 220-222-224 E Chestnut St in
Stillwater. Last year, the building underwent a certified historic restoration, the second such
project in the pending downtown heritage preservation district, and the first to be
completed, A part of the renovation added two 2 bedroom apartments on the second floor
of the structure. I
i
i
I am making this statemetlt in support of approval of the above referenced S.U.P. In order
to rebuild downtown eco~6mic stability, residential use of second floor space in downtown e
is vital. New or renovated units provide a surplus of stable income to the building owners
in the downtown area, increasing property values downtown and eventually making
renovation more possibl~ for larger numbers of structures. They also benefit existing
downtown businesses by providing an increased flow of residential patronization, and more
opportunity for businesses to develop who serve the needs of a local community. All of this
will aid in stabilizing the i community over time against the vagaries imposed by a heavy
economic reliance on toulrism, While the parking issue is a problem that has yet to be
solved, the benefits of res[dential property to downtown Stillwater far outweigh the costs,
and at an average 1 % vacancy factor, tasteful residential property is in very high demand
and is in fact the most viable form of development in the area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Wg
Shawn Otto
1423 Manning Trail
West Lakeland Township~ Mn
436-7767/227-9626 :
e
e
e
e
~ .
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
Date:
October 14, 1991
Time:
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Angela Anderson, Gene Bealka, Glenna Bealka,
Duane Elliott, Gary Funke, Rob Hamlin,
and Don Valsvik
Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director
Ann Pung-Terwedo, City Planner
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Don Valsvik to approve the minutes of September 9, 1991,
as submitted. Seconded by Duane Elliott. All in favor.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. V/91-40 - This hearing is continued from the August
meeting. James Waters, the applicant, stated that the original
sign plan was more horizontal and would have intruded into County
right-of-way. The sign was reevaluated and a more vertical sign
was designed. The sign would be placed on the property line,
which is 30 feet from Greeley Street. The applicant wants to
avoid placing the sign in the parking lot.
The sign would name the office tenants on the second floor. The
first floor retail tenants have signage on the building.
There are three recommended conditions of approval. The
applicant asked that condition number one requiring 40% of the
area of the sign be used for the center name be changed to 30-40%
of the sign area. The Commission agreed with this request, and
also agreed that a fourth condition be added requiring street
addresses on all main level doors (in five-inch letters), and
that the door to the second level list all the suite numbers on
the second level.
Motion by Gary Funke to approve the variance request, amending
condition No. 1 and adding a fourth condition as discussed, with
final approval of the sign by the Community Development Director.
Seconded by Rob Hamlin. All in favor.
Case No. V/91-50 - A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the
placement of a 28 square foot free-standing sign for a retail use
at 110 South Greeley Street. The case was presented along with
Case No. V/91-53.
Case No. V/91-53 - A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the
placement of an 85 square foot pylon sign, 18 feet in height, at
1
. ..
stillwater Planning Comrnie.e.ion
Minutes
October 14, 1991
e
110 South Greeley Street in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist.
Heidi Rosebud, owner of the building, presented the request.
Case No. V/91-50 is a request by an individual tenant of the
building. Case V/91-53 is a request for a sign identifying the
building and the tenants.
Steve Russell eXPlailned that a sign program had been adopted for
the building in 1987,. The building now has a new owner and new
uses for the building.
Ms. Rosebud explained that she is the new owner of the building
and she has renovated the inside of the building and brought it
up to code. She now iwishes to update the outside of the building
with new signage. She stated that her customers have difficulty
locating her build~ng because of the lack of adequate signage.
She stated that anot~er purpose for the pole sign in the parking
lot would be to help light the parking lot at night, when most of
her customers use the: park ing lot.
i
She has talked to mqst of the neighboring residents who have no
objection to the lighted sign. The light would be turned off at
10 p.m.
e
Members of the Commission felt that the sign was oversized and
too commercial for ~ residential district. There was discussion
regarding alternati~e signage programs, such as signage on the
building with direct~onal lights.
Mike McCarthy, 212 S. Greeley st., three houses away from the
building, stated that he feels a lighted pylon sign is not
appropriate for a re~idential neighborhood.
Staff has recommend~d that the pole sign be denied and that the
applicant be reque~ted to work with staff on a building sign
program before any n~w signs are approved.
j
Motion by Don Val~vik to accept the staff recommendation and
request that the ap~licant work with staff in developing a new
sign program to be p~esented to the Commission at the November 18
meeting. Seconded b~ Duane Elliott. All in favor.
,
I
i
Case No. V/91-51 - IThe applicant has requested a continuance to
the November meeting because he is out of town at this time.
Motion by Gary Funk~ to continue Case No. V/91-51 to November
18. Seconded by Ang~la Anderson. All in favor. ~
i .,
Case No. V/91-52 j- A Variance to the Sign Ordinance for
additional signage on a commercial retail establishment which
includes 24 inch channel letters on the rear building facade, and
:
I
:
:
I 2
. ~
another
property
District.
additional sign mounted on a free-standing
is located at 14304 North 60th street
pylon.
in the
The
BP-C
Mike Dimond, Cardinal Development, presented the application. He
presented pictures for the Commission's review and stated that
customers, especially those eastbound on Highway 36, cannot
locate the Tires Plus store. He also stated that channel letters
on the west side of the building would make the building appear
less industrial in nature.
The Commission members agreed that the business already exceeds
the number of signs and total square footage allowed in the auto
center, and therefore, cannot be granted two additional signs.
It was suggested that the tire brand name signs be removed from
the east side of the building and that one additional sign be
allowed.
Motion by Rob Hamlin to approve the Variance request with three
conditions: 1} Remove the tire brand name signs from the east
side; 2) Allow 24 inch channel letters on the west side; 3) No
additional pylon signage allowed. Seconded by Glenna Bealka. All
in favor.
Case No. SUP/91-54 - A Special Use Permit for a residential use
on the second level of a commercial structure at 125 South Main
Street in the Central Business District. Kathleen Granger
presented the application.
She requested that the second level of the building be converted
to a 1,000 sq. foot apartment on the east side of the building.
There will be a separate entrance to the apartment in accordance
with the building code. There will be no changes made to the
outside of the building. There will be parking required for only
one vehicle.
There are two recommended conditions of approval, the first being
a list of building and fire code requirements.
Motion by Rob Hamlin to approve the special use permit with the
conditions as listed. Seconded by Gary Funke. All in favor.
OTHER
e
st. Croix Riverway View StudY/Existing Conditions -
Ann Pung-Terwedo explalined that in 1989 a lawsuit was brought
against the City by the DNR for granting a variance to the
bluffland/shoreland ordinance for the construction of an addition
to a home at 120 Lakeside Drive. The DNR has now requested that
the City conduct a view study of Stillwater from the st. Croix
River.
The COIT@ission viewed a videotape of the view of stillwater from
the st. Croix River. Next month, the Commission will discuss
regulations. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DiY
DA: October 30, 1991
RE: LAND PURCHASE FOR ARMORY SITE
The City Council directed me to explore the financing available for the possible
purchase of additional land next to the armory site.
The financing options available to the City for purchase of this land are limited
to: 1) use of tax increment funds and/or 2) capital outlay bond funds.
Reconunendations:
At this time, all available tax increment funds have been pledged to outstanding
bonds or conuni tted to prior proj ects and/or agreements. Therefore, TIF financing
is not possible. The option of selling capital outlay bonds for approximately
$350,000 would place an additional burden on the general tax levy for the
citizens of Stillwater.
In light of the current budget restraints, reductions in state aid and future
needs for capital outlay bonding for equipment, I cannot reconunend capital outlay
bonds for financing this land purchase.
e
e
r iIlwater
"~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1991
SUBJECT: LEVEE WALL CONDITION REPORT AND REQUEST FOR US
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FUNDING TO REPAIR THE
WALL.
The report on the condi tion of the levee wall authorized by
the City Council is complete. On October 30,1991, the
condition of the wall was reviewed with representatives from
the Corps of Engineers. They discussed two programs,
Emergency Bank Protection and 1960 River and Harbor Act that
may assist the City.
e
A resolution has been prepared to initiate Corps consider-
ation of the project. Corp assistance could cover 50% to 75%
of the eligible project costs. Army Corp representatives
feel the project, or portions of the levee wall replacement
project, may fit under the emergency program or Harbor
Assistance Program, but because of the historic significance
of Lowell Park and the levee wall as a historic structure
and its location on the St. Croix a Wild and Scenic River,
special legislation may be appropriate if the regular
programs do not work.
RESOLUTION:
Acceptance of Lowell Park Levee Wall erosion protection
inspection report and approval of resolution authorizing
application for US Corps of Engineers assistance to repair
the wall.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
RESOLUTION NO. t /-;J;)L
BE IT RESOLVED that theiCity of Stillwater requests the US Army Corps of
Engineers to conduct stud~es to determine the feasibility of developing an
emergency street and bamk protection project along the St. Croix River in
Downtown Stillwater under !the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946
Flood Control Act as amended;
BE I T FURTHER RESOLVED" tha t the Corps of Engi neers study tile feas ibi 1 i ty of
improving the waterfront ~or docking of commercial craft under Section 107 of
the 1960 River Harbor Act~
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has commissioned a Lowell Park Levee Wall
erosion protection study -ohat indicates the clear danger of the wall. s future
(report attached). I
WHEREAS, the St. Croix ~iver is a nationally designated wild and scenic river
and a documented natural and cultural resource to the nation;
WHEREAS, the levee wall is a contributing structure in the Downtown Stillwater
Commercial Historic District, it is understood that, if it is found to be
feasible and advisabl~, to develop a stream bank protection project in
Sti 11 water, the Ci ty Counci 1 woul d be requi red before cons tructi on commence s e
to enter into a contractual agreement that it will be required before
construction commences to enter into a contractual agreement that it will
provide such local cooperation as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the
Army. I
I
I
THEREFORE, the Clerk bf the City of Stillwater shall be, and is hereby
directed, to transmit three copies of this resolution to the District
Engineer, St. Paul District, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1421 US Post Office
Building and Custom House, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-9808.
~ ~ ~ ./,0 j~ cl-rr-)'Zv /7"1
Mayor
Attest:
e
r illwater
~ - - ~
--- -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF M.INNESOTA J
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1991
SUBJECT: HISTORIC BACKGROUND ON LEVEE WALL
The Levee Wall was designed and constructed as part of a
WPA project in 1937-1938. The designer of the project was
Elmer G. Lohman. He revised and expanded the plans of
Morrell and Nichlos who did the original plans for Lowell
Park in 1914-1916. This firm also did a park plan for the
City of Stillwater.
Stillwater had a very active Park Board due to the efforts
of Elmore Lowell, $uperintendent of the Board of Park
Commissioners, during 1910-1930. Mr. Lowell also owned the
Sawyer House and later built the Lowell Inn. The Levee Wall
has Lowell Park engraved in the upper wall in memory of Mr.
Lowell for his dedication to the City of Stillwater.
The City of Stillwater and the City Park Board took a very
active role in the review of the design specifications for
the levee wall.
The Levee Wall is presently an historic structure in the
Downtown Commercial Historic District, soon to be nominated
to the National Register of Historic Places. The Heritage
Preservation Commission strongly recommends the upper wall
be preserved and the lower wall be reconstructed as close
to its original form as possible.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
r iIlwater
~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1991
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE A CONSULTANT TO ASSIST
PROPERTY OWNERS PREPARE PLANS FOR NEW CANOPY.
The canopy has been removed on the west side of Main Street
in front of St. Croix Drug and Main Street Square. This
request is to authorize use of City planning professional
service funds to pay the cost of new awning design.
A description of the scope of work is attached. The new
awnings would meet City design guidelines. The money is in
the Planning Budget.
e
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorization of consultant services.
ATTACHMENT:
Scope of work - October 25, 1991.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
Mark s. Ba1ay Architects
122 N. Main St. Suite B
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 430-3312
e
10/25/91
City of Stillwater
Planning Department
216 N. Fourth St~
Stillwater, MN 5~082
Dear Steve:
As you requested,I have examined the subject properties on Main Street
and organized a $imple plan of action to accomplish your design/planning
service goals wi~h the property owners.
i
I would propose the following action outline:
1) owner ~eeting #1 *orientation to possibilities and standards
, *owner design requests
i *budget for improvements
2) fieldwork *investigate existing conditions
*take field measurements
*investigate historic appearance
*initial design solution for each of
the property owners
#2 *review initial design solution
Billable
Hours
(2 )
(4)
e
3) prelim~nary
drawin~s
4) oivner meeting
5) revise, and
prepar6 final
designl package
6) owner meeting #3 'kreview package prior to owner's (2)
implementation with H.P.C. and
construction contracting
>'<final design. descriptive package
and product referals
(4)
(4)
(16)
Total Billable Hours 32
The above con~ultation processwalid be accomplished for a
,
guaranteed maximfm fee of $800.00 not including reimbursables.
These services d,b not include construction documents, :,product specific2tions,
presentations to H.P.C., or specific graphic design for businesses.
any questions.
e
e
r i1lwater
~ ~
TH~RTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA i)
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1991
SUBJECT: FUNDING FOR HIGHWAY 36 TRAFFIC STUDY.
e
Short, Elliott and Hendrickson has prepared a scope of work
for a Stillwater/Oak Park Heights traffic study (attached).
The study would provide needed traffic information regarding
existing conditions and projected traffic on Highway 36
interchange and City streets. This information would then
furnish the local jurisdictions with traffic information in
order to plan local streets. The cost of the study is
$11,800, It is recommended the City participate in the study
with Oak Park Heights, Washington County and MnDOT. The
City's share of the study cost would be 25% or $2,950.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of $2,950 for Highway 36 Traffic Study.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter from Glen Van Wormer - Short, Elliott and Hendrickson
and scope of work, October 24, 1991.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
'....seJ
e ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5T PAUL, MINNE50TA 55110 612490-2000
October 24, 1991
RE: Traffic Study, Local Improvements
associated with T,H, 36 Improvements
Mr, Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Steve:
e
Thank you for calling Monday to discuss the County Road 5 improvements and the
meeting with Washington County and Mn/OOT, As discussed, we prepared a
preliminary cost estimate for conducting a traffic study of the local street system leading
to T.H, 36 relative to Mn/OOT's proposed improvement. We anticipate the cost and
emphasis of such a study will be shared by all four parties with an interest in the vicinity's
traffic system: City of Stillwater, City of Oak Park Heights, Washington County and Mn/
DOT,
The study will identify effects of the proposed Mn/OOT modifications to T,H, 36 on the
local roadway systems of Washington County, City of Stillwater and City of Oak Park
Heights, The advantage in looking at the area comprehensively is to identify the
necessary local roadways' capacities and volumes, Such an analysis will also identify the
local street traffic volumes given various capacity scenarios for local streets, arterials and
interchanges.
We propose studying the area bounded by Orleans Street on the north, between Osgood
and State Highway 95 on the east, the newly annexed area in Oak Park Heights on the
south and C,S,A,H, 5 on the west. All frontage roads and local streets which are either
primary or secondary routes will be analyzed to determine necessary capacities given the
anticipated development within the study area, Our proposed work tasks for this project
are outlined in the attached submittal.
Sincerely,
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
~~!/ttntJ~
e
Glen Van Wormer, P.E.,
Manager, Transportation Department
:''': .
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
ST PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
Stillwater jOak Park Heights Traffic Study
I. Establish Street Network for Analysis of Existing Traffic Volumes within Study Area
The existing street system to be analyzed will be determined by the cities of Stillwater and
Oak Park Heights, Washington County and Mn/OOT, Traffic volumes during afternoon
and evening peak hours will be gathered within the study area, Traffic volumes outside the
study area will also be used to estimate the traffic entering/ exiting the study area via T,H,
36, County Road 5 or other local streets, These volumes will be requested from Mn/OOT,
Oak Park Heights and Washington County, Using existing counts we will estimate existing
traffic volumes through the study area. In addition, we will project area background traffic
growth to 2015 regardless of future development potential within the study area,
II. Identify Future land Uses and Trip Generation Potential
With help from the cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, all vacant or redevelopment
property in the study area will be identified, The cities will provide input regarding future
land uses on these properties, After agreeing upon the appropriate land uses for vacanti
redevelopment property, we will calculate future trip generation potential within each
parcel.
III. Computer Model
Once the above data has been collected, a computer model will be created using street
system, existing traffic volumes, background traffic growth and intersection capacity, The
study area will be divided into traffic analysis zones and the future trip generation potential
for each zone will be included in the model.
IV. Distribution of Future Traffic
We will determine the appropriate trip distribution of future trips into and out of the study
area, For new development, this will include identifying traffic which makes internal trips
within the study area, This is particularly important since T,H, 36 traverses the study area,
and internal traffic is routed across the highway.
V. Identify and Analyze Road System Alternatives
This task involves identifying local street system changes and interchange reconfigurations,
Once these alternatives have been determined existing and future traffic will be
redistributed to reflect these alternatives, This involves modifying the street network and
traffic distribution within the model. The alternatives to be analyzed will be discussed with
the clients,
e
VI. Capacity Analysis
For each alternative analyzed, a capacity analysis of primary and secondary intersections
will be conducted to identify the capacity necessary at these intersections and roadways,
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
Page 1
Special emphasis \-\fill be given to areas where City and County work will interface with
Mn/OOT improve*ents to the T,H, 36 corridor. Potential capacity restraints due to lack of tit
right-of-way, topography, and so on will be recognized throughout the distribution and
capacity analysis p~ocedures.
VII. Write Report
A draft report will be prepared using text and graphics to describe roadway network
alternatives consid~red, A final presentation to the City and County staff, City Councils,
Washington coun]. and Mn/OOT will be made,
VIII. Schedule
SEH is available to begin work on the project the first week of November, We anticipate
completion of a dra~ report for the cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, Washington
County and Mn/D<j)T by December 20, If comments on this study are received by January
10, a final report will be completed by January 17, 1992,
IX. Staff Assignments
Glen Van Wormer, P.E. is Manager of the Transportation Department at SEH, Ai3 Principal-
in-charge, Glen will supervise and oversee all aspects of the Stillwater/Oak Park Heights
Traffic Study, GlenJhas more than 26 years' experience in transportation engineering and
planning, Thirteen years of Glen's career were spent at Mn/OOT, He brings valuable
communication an. coordination experience with Mn/OOT, the Metropolitan Council, e
counties and citiesi' Glen's varied background has been an asset in developing and
implementing practical and current long-range planning/ engineering solutions,
i
I
Cindy R. Gray, A.Le.p. has more than six years' experience as a transportation planner with
a variety of experience from computer modeling to development of impact studies, site plan
review, and conceptual alignment/ geometric studies, Much of her work revolves around
the interface betwetn highway/roadway operations and adjacent land uses, site design,
driveways and loc~~ streets, Cindy will serve as project manager and be responsible for
setting up and ruIUlling the computer model as well as the majority of the associated work
tasks outlined,
Thomas A. Sohrwei~e, P.E. has more than 17 years' experience as a traffic engineer, For 14
years of his career ihe was the Traffic and Parking Engineer for the City of Appleton,
Wisconsin, Since jo~g SEH, Tom has been project manager on concept and preliminary
road design projecr' traffic studies and traffic signal system design projects, Tom will
conduct the capacitr analysis for the various local roadway and intersection alternatives
analyzed in the tra~fic study. This analysis will determine the capacity needed to handle
projected traffic vol1lunes, He is well-versed in the use of various software used in analyzing
of roadway capacif}r and signal progression,
I
i
Robert H. Byers, P.lE. is a transportation engineer who has focused much of his 15-yea~
career in transporMtion planning and forecasting, with special emphasis on computer
i
i
I
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc~
I
i
I
Page 2
e
e
e
modeling, Bob was project manager for the Dakota County Transportation Study and
continues to work closely with the County in further developing, refining and updating the
model. Bob's primary responsibility will be assisting in creating the computer model for the
traffic study.
x.
Estimated Hours and Fees
We propose to base our fee on actual costs for work performed with a maximum not-to-
exceed amount. Invoices will be based on actual hours worked utilizing payroll costs times
a multiplier to provide for administration, overhead and profit. Actual cost of expenses
including mileage, publication of reports and computer usage will be invoiced and are
included in the estimated cost.
The total cost for this project is $11,800, This includes a separate meeting with the City of
Stillwater and the City of Oak Park Heights regarding future land uses on vacant and
redevelopment properties within the study area, In addition, it includes one joint meeting
with the Cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights and Washington County to identify the
local street/County Road network alternatives which should be analyzed,
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
Page 3
Stillwater jOak Park Heights Traffic Study
I. Establish Street Network for Analysis of Existing Traffic Volumes within Study Area
The existing street system to be analyzed will be determined by the cities of Stillwater and
Oak Park Heights, Washington County and Mn/OOT. Traffic volumes during afternoon
and evening peak hours will be gathered within the study area. Traffic volumes outside the
study area will also be used to estimate the traffic entering/exiting the study area via T,H,
36, County Road 5 or other local streets, These volumes will be requested from Mn/DOT,
Oak Park Heights and Washington County. Using existing counts we will estimate existing
traffic volumes through the study area. In addition, we will project area background traffic
growth to 2015 regardless of future development potential within the study area,
II. Identify Future Land Uses and Trip Generation Potential
With help from the cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, all vacant or redevelopment
property in the study area will be identified. The cities will provide input regarding future
land uses on these properties, After agreeing upon the appropriate land uses for vacanti
redevelopment property, we will calculate future trip generation potential within each
parcel.
III. Computer Model
Once the above data has been collected, a computer model will be created using street
system, existing traffic volumes, background traffic growth and intersection capacity, The
study area will be divided into traffic analysis zones and the future trip generation potential
for each zone will be included in the model.
IV. Distribution of Future Traffic
We will determine the appropriate trip distribution of future trips into and out of the study
area, For new development, this will include identifying traffic which makes internal trips
within the study area, This is particularly important since T.H, 36 traverses the study area,
and internal traffic is routed across the highway,
V. Identify and Analyze Road System Alternatives
This task involves identifying local street system changes and interchange reconfigurations,
Once these alternatives have been determined existing and future traffic will be
redistributed to reflect these alternatives, This involves modifying the street network and
traffic distribution within the model. The alternatives to be analyzed will be discussed with
the clients,
e
VI. Capacity Analysis
For each alternative analyzed, a capacity analysis of primary and secondary intersections
will be conducted to identify the capacity necessary at these intersections and roadways,
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.
Page 1
Special emphasis will be given to areas where City and County work will interface with-
Mn/OOT improvements to the T,H, 36 corridor, Potential capacity restraints due to lack of e
right-of-way, topography, and so on will be recognized throughout the distribution and
capacity analysis procedures,
VII. Write Report
A draft report will, be prepared using text and graphics to describe roadway network
alternatives consid$'ed, A final presentation to the City and County staff, City Councils,
Washington Count)f and Mn/OOT will be made.
VIII. Schedule
SEH is available to begin work on the project the first week of November. We anticipate
completion of a draft report for the cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, Washington
County and Mn/OOT by December 20, If comments on this study are received by January
10, a final report w~ be completed by January 17, 1992,
IX. Staff Assignments I
.Glen Van Wonner, It.E. is Manager of the Transportation Department at SEH, As Principal-
in-Charge, Glen wiq supervise and oversee all aspects of the Stillwater/Oak Park Heights
Traffic Study. Glen l1as more than 26 years' experience in transportation engineering and
planning, Thirteen years of Glen's career were spent at Mn/OOT, He brings valuable
communication an~ coordination experience with Mn/OOT, the Metropolitan Council, e
counties and cities, Glen's varied background has been an asset in developing and
implementing practical and current long-range planning/engineering solutions,
Cindy R. Gray, A.I.q.P. has more than six years' experience as a transportation planner with
a variety of experiente from computer modeling to development of impact studies, site plan
review, and conceptp,al alignment/geometric studies, Much of her work revolves around
the interface betwe~n highway/roadway operations and adjacent land uses, site design,
driveways and loca~ streets, Cindy will serve as project manager and be responsible for
setting up and runni\ng the computer model as well as the majority of the associated work
tasks outlined, .
Thomas A. Sohrwei4e, P.E. has more than 17 years' experience as a traffic engineer. For 14
years of his career he was the Traffic and Parking Engineer for the City of Appleton,
Wisconsin, Since jo' , g SEH, Tom has been project manager on concept and preliminary
road design projec , traffic studies and traffic signal system design projects, Tom will
conduct the capaci analysis for the various local roadway and intersection alternatives
analyzed in the traf 'c study, This analysis will determine the capacity needed to handle
projected traffic volulmes, He is well-versed in the use of various software used in analyzing
of roadway capacityiand signal progression,
Robert H. Byers, p.l is a transportation engineer who has focused much of his IS-year e
career in transportation planning and forecasting, with special emphasis on computer
'I
Short~Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. \
I
Page 2
modeling. Bob was project manager for the Dakota County Transportation Study and
continues to work closely with the County in further developing, refining and updating the
model. Bob's primary responsibility will be assisting in creating the computer model for the
traffic study,
X. Estimated Hours and Fees
We propose to base our fee on actual costs for work performed with a maximum not-to-
exceed amount. Invoices will be based on actual hours worked utilizing payroll costs times
a multiplier to provide for administration, overhead and profit. Actual cost of expenses
including mileage, publication of reports and computer usage will be invoiced and are
included in the estimated cost.
The total cost for this project is $11,800, This includes a separate meeting with the City of
Stillwater and the City of Oak Park Heights regarding future land uses on vacant and
redevelopment properties within the study area, In addition, it includes one joint meeting
with the Cities of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights and Washington County to identify the
local street/County Road network alternatives which should be analyzed,
e
Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc,
Page 3
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR~
DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1991
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE FLOOD PLAIN ORDINANCE -
ZAT/91-2
Because of changes in the Federal Flood Regulations, the
State Department of Natural Resources is requiring that
local governments modify their Flood Plain Ordinance.
Changes in the regulations are described in the Water Talk
Paper attached.
e
Besides the required changes, the Stillwater Ordinance has
special provision for historic structures. Existing
historic structures are exempt from flood requirements as
long as the project does not alter the structure to the
extent that it does not meet historic structure criteria.
Other changes in the Ordinance allow parking uses under
certain conditions in the Flood Fringe District below the
regulated flood level and provide more specific criteria
for accessory structures in the Floodplain. The Ordinance
terminology has been changed to be consistent with the
platted shoreland definitions.
The Planning Commission received the Amended Ordinance at
their meetings of June 10, 1991 and August 12, 1991 and
recommended it for adoption.
Comments from the Department of Natural Resources and the
Minnesota Historical Society have been incorporated in the
Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the new Floodplain Ordinance for first reading.
e
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Floodplain Ordinance
2, Letter from the Mi nnesota Department of Natural
Resources dated April 9, 1991.
3, Letter from Ross Toepel to Molly Shodeen dated
October 28, 1991.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
DNR METRO REGION 6
TEL:612-772-7977
FaX!I l/"'3;. _
October 2S, 1991
To: Molly Shodeen
From; Ross J. Toepel ~
RE: STILLWATER FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE
l-STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION
There needs to be a reference to M.S. 462 for Municipalities
~ 2-GENERAL PROVISIONS
zoning District Boundaries
There needs to be a more complete def ini tion of how the zoning
District Boundaries relate to the FIRM maps and the city zoning
maps.
3-DEFINITIONS
Basement: NON-COMPLIANT
The definition of Basement given in the Sample Ordinance is, "Means
any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor
or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless
of the depth of excavation below ground level."
Your definition is, "Area of building with its floor below grade."
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation: NON-COMPLIANT
The definition given in the Sample Ordinance is, liThe Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one
foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases
in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that
result from designation of a floodway."
Your definition is, "The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation
shall be an elevation one foot above regional flood level."
'1'here needs to be language which describes the floodway stage
increase.
8-FLOODWAY DISTRICT
e
Sa. Permitted Uses
There is no reference to Industrial-commercial loading areas;,
parking areas, and airport landing strips. I wonder why.
8f-2. storage of materials and equipment
The language given in the Sample Ordinance is, "storage of other
materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the
area within the time available after a flood warning and in
accordance with a plan approved by the Governing Body."
Your language does not include "and in accordance with a plan
approved by the Governing Body."
DNR METRO REGION 6
TEL:612-772-7977
Oct 28 91
11:56 No.007 P,02
8d-5. Storage of Jaterials and Equipment
ad-5a. In your ordinance the word "Hazardous" is not included.
e
i
10-SUBDIVISION OF (LAND
lOa. There is no ~anguage that requires the RFPE and elevation of
all access roads dlearly labelled on all subdivision drawings and
platting document~. There also is no language that requires
information in d~termining re.gional flood elevation, floodway,
flood fringe distI'ict boundaries and RFPE as in the General Flood
Plain District. lso there needs to be language regarding the
removal of SFHA De,signation.
14-ADMINISTRATION
. I .
14c. There lS no l~nguage defin~n9 the board of adjustment. This
is mandatory langu~ge
e
e
e
~~T~T~@'iY&
~~DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
500 LAFAYElTE ROAD · ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA · 55155-40
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296-6157
e
e
,/1--
April 9, 1991
-J'..d; ~ 14' "'.G-
O <A: C, s f7'hT;-
steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of stillwater
216 North 4th street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
Enclosed is a new model floodplain ordinance which most closely meets
your community's needs. As you are probably already aware, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Minnesota DNR have
negotiated this model ordinance to reflect the changes in federal
regulations which were actually effective in 1986. Because of these
changes every community in the National Flood Insurance Program is
being required to amend their floodplain zoning ordinances.
Please note that the new model is also available (at no charge) on
floppy disk for a personal computer. Available formats are Microsoft
Word and ASCII.
If you prefer to amend the existing ordinance we would have to review
it more closely to be sure there are no omissions. Although state
regulations allow 6 months to amend your ordinance, federal
regulations only allow 90 days from the receipt of this letter for
amendments to non-compliant ordinances. It is suggested that you
attempt to meet the federal deadline in order to avoid any possible
sanctions imposed by FEMA. Because state law also requires that a
proposed local ordinance be reviewed and approved 30 days prior to
adoption, please send any drafts being considered for adoption to Area
Hydrologist Molly Shodeen in 60 days.
Please feel free to contact your Ms. Shodeen or myself (612-296-9224)
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
AJ,'-( rYa-{,d-GUt-y
Udy Boudreau
FEMA-CAP Hydrologist
cc: Mayor Wallace Abrahamson
Molly Shodeen, Area Hydrologist (612-772-7910)
John Linc Stine, Regional Hydrologist
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
~~f
-':'-','
. . .
"-~--'-'7""----------':"-=",...o...-. ....'......--.-.,.--. .-. -.-...-........-.-
- ---...-- . . - -,,--_.- .
.....- _..,-._.-~.__......--..,':'.-:_._~_.._-_.- .~...-...._-_.. .
.----... --- --- --------- --
e
~odernizes Its
ng Capability
Larry Seymour
n agency spends a little money on some
lotivated employee loose on a project?
_ned when the Division of Waters
tem! They turned it over to Jcrry
~neering Aide in charge of drawing up
ected by our "ace" water survey crew,
Waters entered the "Age of Computer
)t very far behind private industry by
~at for a small agency such as the DOW,
ronym for Computer Aided Drafting")
a Master Electrician is to electricity...
i is an understatement! This along with
~thic helped him take to the CAD sys-
fear has gone by since the CAD system
lefits and advantages of the system Con-
lready, most of Jerry's routine drafting
), His old drafting table is used mostly
His T -square, lettering pens, templates
ar destined for the archives,
:1 CAD include:
)s
ions
ulation of areas)
, color slides
arencies
Wnd hearing documents
;ently I feel that topography drawings are
:1t of the time that they used to, Output
ter, It appears from checking the work,
s down about 50% also, Probably there
a drawing now: additional cross sections,
... continued on Pa~e2
W6JU@[f
LJ6JDlli
Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Waters
Fall, 1988
New FEMA Rules Mandate
Changes to Local Floodplain
Ordinances
By Joe Gibson
In July, 1988 the Federal Emergency Management Agency
and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources com-
pleted negotiations that will require most counties and cities in
Minnesota to revise their floodplain zoning ordinances, These
changes are needed to bring local floodplain zoning ordinances
into compliance with changes in federal regulations which were
actually effective in 1986,
The negotiation process has resulted in the creation of a new
set of "model floodplain ordinances" for Minnesota, Below is a
list of major changes that have been included in the revised
model floodplain ordinances:
1. The definition of "basement' was expanded to include
all below grade areas enclosed on all four sides,
2. Provisions were included to regulate the placement of
travel trailers and travel vehicles.
... continued on page 4
.................
..........."..... .
................. .
..................
..................
..
.........................
................................................................-.......-...
........ ..... ...... .....
......;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.z.;...;.:.:-;..
.........-:.:.;.:-;.:.;.:.:.;.;.:-;.;.;..-:.:.....:.................. .........:.:.:.;.....:.;..........'_............................'.
............... ....
.......:...:.;.;.;.;.....;...:...;.......
'.' '.'
. '. ~
. ..'
.. ..-.........
,- ~,
" "
:., ..' -: ~ -' .. . .
,.: -. . .',
. . .
. .
\...) .,'
';/. '
Page 4
, Water Talk
FEMA Rule Chages ... continued from Page 1
. .... .......... . ',: . 3. Changes were made in the application of wet or dry
:l:ii1;,;i', ,i. flood proofing techniques for acc~ssory structures
J:.f:; '} . and substantial Improvement to primary structures,
:,"'%,,-' i' 4. Changes were made requiring replacement manufac-
; 1\ '~;i,: .' ;': tured homes to be properly elevated and anchored,
::;il';{/, 1,,1.5. Changes were made to incorporate specific enforce-
: ~:iit;t,~12'd;;l,:.,ment procedures for dealing with ordinance violations,
,; ~';,H\~.6.~ Minor grammatical changes were also incorporated to
w;clarify confusing language. .
;~:Th~ "end result of this process is that essentially all local
fl~plain,zoning ordinances in the state are now non-com-
pliant:withfederal regulations, This is a serious problem but
don't panlc~ :,The DNR has also negotiated a schedule for revis-
ing local.ordinances and these revisions will occur over a three
. ear,> ~ei>eriod"~I"EMA agreed to this strategy with the hope
~,~~~,~I?~~~~W~~~p~grade process will be accomplished,
Hmy~yrillthis pr~ss affect local governments? If DNR or
~~e.dw.e~ a Community Assistance Visit (CA V) in your
:ooDlIDumty, the community will be expected to adopt a new or-
. ~ance~r amend its. existing ordinance to become compliant
'.Wlth the new regulations, State law allows a community six
I months to amend its ordinance but federal laws only allow three
:<j' ..... ..' . , ',-:-
i:';' ,..;::,-1,; .rl
Fall, 1988
months so it is a good idea to amend the zoning ordinance as
rapidly as feasible to avoid possible federal sanctions,
About 30 counties and cities currently are in the process of
adopting the new, compliant language, Many are simply repeal-
ing their old ordinances entirely and adopting the new model in
its place,
, Since most communities revise and upgrade their zoning or-
dinances periodically, we encourage any in that situation to con-
sider upgrading their floodplain ordinances at the same time,
This may help reduce hearing and notice costs. Any community
in that situation should contact DNR or FEMA and get a copy
of the new model ordinance that is applicable to your com-
munity, One way or another all local government units par-
ticipating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) will
be contacted during the next three years,
As always, your DNR Area Hydrologist or the Floodplain
Management Program staff in St. Paul will be happy to provide
assistance and advice in adopting or amending your ordinance,
You can also call on these same people if you have questions
about your flood insurance rate maps, state or federal laws and
regulations or interpretations of your local ordinance,
Joe Gibson is supervisor of Minnesota's Floodplain Manage-
ment Program and is a regular contributor to Water Talk,
Some communities get
real serious about
proper floodplain
management. FEMA's
David Schein took this
photo of an elevated
telephone booth in Jo
Davies County, Illinois
on a routine Community
Assessment Visit of a
nearby community. The
only thing that this in-
stallation needs is a boat
.. ... - ~ - .!....
....-----
r
I
Page 5
Flood Insl
Emphasis t
1989 will be marked b
Flood Insurance Program
This message was rela}
Schwartz at our Septembe
Branch Chief of the Feder
(FEMA) Region 5 Natun
Norb said, "In Minnesc
Phase of the NFIP will be
essence this means that n
done in Minnesota, Our f
be shifted to emphasize n
isting studies."
"More emphasis will 1
than we have in the past.
community assessment v
low-up to ensure that any
are corrected."
A common problem t
.- failure of communitieslo
tures built in the f100dp
whether a community is f
When this is noted in the
ly required to submit aft
was built to the proper e
In the southern U ,S" J
communities on probati,
correct ordinance violaf
Ultimately, if complian.
will be suspended from
While there are n
floodplain management
mind. the three most in
TION and ELEVATlOI
1. When reviewing pre
you must first deter
tion ELEVATION Is
Fall, 1988 .
~ ". ..'-.<.._.....'.~.
. .... . '. >-,_.,~--~;
I amend the zoning ordinance as-
,ssible federal sanctions.-..
es currently are in the process of
LDguage. Many are simply repeal-
Iy and adopting the new model in
Page 5
Water Talk
Flood Insurance Program
Emphasis Changes In 1989
vise and upgrade their zoning or-
mrage any in that situation to Con-
ain ordinances at the same time,
and notice costs. Any community
:t DNR Of FEMA and get a copy
that is applicable to your com-
'all local government units par-
d Insurance Program (NFIP) will
hree years, ..
a Hydrologist or the Floodplain
St. Paul will be happy to provide
:ing or amending your ordinance,
me people if you have questions
:e maps, state or federal laws and
of your local ordinance,
Minnesota's Floodplain Manage-
contributor to Water Talk,
1989 will be marked by "new beginnings" in the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP),
This message was relayed to DNR staff by Norbert (Norb)
Schwartz at our September coordination meeting, Norb is the
Branch Chief of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's
(FEMA) Region 5 Natural Hazards Branch in Chicago,
Norb said, "In Minnesota, all communities in the Emergency
Phase of the NFIP will be converted to the Regular Phase, In
essence this means that no new flood insurance studies will be
done in Minnesota, OUf funding for technical analysis work will
be shifted to emphasize re-studies and mapping changes on ex-
isting studies," \
"More emphasis will be placed on community compliance
than we have in the past," Norb continued, "This means more
community assessment visits (CA V's) and'more effort on fol-
low- up to ensure that any ordinance administration deficiencies
are corrected."
A common problem the Division of Waters has noted is the
failure of communities to certify the as-built elevations on struc-
tures built in the floodplain, This is a very important gage of
whether a community is adequately administering its ordinance,
When this is noted in the CA V process, the community is usual-
ly required to submit after-the-fact evidence that the structure
was built to the proper elevation,
In the southern U ,S" FEMA has been forced to place several
communities on probation for failure to certify ordinances or to
correct ordinance violations they were instructed to implement.
Ultimately, if compliance is not achieved, these communities
will be suspended from the NFIP,
While there are many complicated issues related to
floodplain management, local permitting officials must keep in
mind the three most important ones: ELEVATION, ELEVA-
TION and ELEVATION.
1. When reviewing project plans and permit applications,
you must first determine what the proper flood protec-
tion ELEV A TJON is for the site.
2, When the building permit is issued, specify on the permit
what ELEVATION the structure must be built to or
above, This will lead to less conflict, especially when
several subcontractors may be involved in the project.
3. After the structure is built, make certain that the as built
ELEVATION is certified in accordance with your or-
dinance before a certificate of occupancy or zoning
compliance is issued,
Do this and your community should have very few problems
with the Federal Emergency Management Agency!
e
Some communities get
real serious about
proper floodplain
management. FEMA's
David Schein took this
photo of an elevated
telephone booth in J 0
Davies County, Illinois
on a routine Community
Assessment Visit of a
nearby community. The
only thing that this in-
stallation needs is a boat
dock to tie up to so it
could be used during a
flood. David works as a
Community Coordina-
tion Officer for FEMA
"eir Chicago
~ion 5 office.
Zoning Software
Zoning ordinances are gr
me, At least that's what mo
The City Clerks, Adr
ministrators of Minnesota
responsibility of enforcing
regulations, Needless to say,
dinance can be a challenge [.
Therefore to help make t
making easier, theDNR, DC
on a project to develop ~
ministrators, The action wac
dations contained in a fe~
Division,
If development proceeds
ready for pilot tests in seve:
The system will be designed
patible.equipped with a har'
done through the Departme
to be able to offer it for no or
required to enforce floodpla
The feasibility study ine!
survey to test the level of inte
survey was sent to 150 cities
(70%) returned the survey,
58% indicated that they de~
made available to them, Tht
to specify which zoning dat~
in order to meet their needs
The study also reviewed
test their compatibility with:
shoreland zoning regulatiOl
needs without significant cc
The goal is to develop a p
about any zoning administr
floodplain regulations are
plans include a self generat
tion and several self generat
administrative purposes,
Anyone interested in tl
Sandstrom at (612) 297-388
hearing from any communit.
munity,
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
FOUNDED IN 1849
Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, MN 55111 · (612) 726-1171
September 4, 1991
Ms. Ann Pung-Terwedo
City Hall
216 North Fourth
stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Ms. Pung-Terwedo:
Re: Amendment to Flood Plain Ordinance
stillwater, Washington County
MHS Referral File Number: 91-2314
e
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above
ordinance. It has been reviewed pursuant to the responsibilities
given the State Historic Preservation Officer by the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the Ad-
visory Council on Historic Preservation (36CFR800), and to the
responsibilities given the Minnesota Historical society by the
Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and the Minnesota Historic sites
Act.
Inclusion of ordinance provlslons to encourage appropriate
preservation of historic properties while addressing flood plain
issues is important. As you are aware, stillwater's downtown
historic district, which is locally designated and which is
eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places,
is an outstanding resource. These provisions help to insure
protection of that resource.
1. We would suggest that the definition of
ture contained in subd. 22.3.i. be modified
precisely reflect state and local programs.
we would suggest the following changes:
historic struc-
to more
Specifically,
Change 22.3.i.3. to: "Individually listed on the State
Registry of Historic sites".
e
Change 22.3.i.4. to: "Locally designated as an in-
dividual property or as a contributing element of a
historic district by the stillwater City Council
through the process established by the stillwater
Heritage Preservation Ordinance. The Stillwater
heritage preservation program was certified by the Min-
nesota State Historic Preservation Office and the
Department of the Interior on January 29, 1988."
e
September 4, 1991
Ann Pung-Terwedo
MHS #91-2314
Page two
2. We would also suggest that section 22.17.A. stipulate a
formal involveme~t by the stillwater Heritage Preservation
commission in ma~ing the necessary determinations.
Please keep us inform~d as to the progress in adopting these
regulations.
s~'~~
I
Dennis A. Gimmestad
Government Programs and Compliance Officer
DAG:dmb
cc: Britta Bloomberg Acting Deputy State Historic Preservation
Officer, Fort Snelling History Center, st. Paul, MN 55111
-
Judy Boudreau, Division of Waters, DNR
500 Lafayette Ro~d - 32, st. Paul, MN 55146
e
Subd. 22.
FLOOD PLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT
e
Flood Plain Control
1. Authorization.
The legislature of the State of Minnesota has in Minnesota Statutes,
Chapters 103F and 462 and Minnesota Rules 6120.510 delegated the
responsibility to local governmental units to adopt regulations to
control development in flood prone areas and minimize loses.
2. General Provisions.
a. The Flood Plan Overlay District shall consist of all lands
within the jurisdiction of the City of Stillwater shown on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (dated February 1, 1984) prepared
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development wi th
designated Zone A or numbered Zone A areas. These maps in
addition to the Zoning District Map are the zoning map and are
on file in the office of the city clerk. The Flood Insurance
Study for the City of Stillwater prepared by the Federal
Insurance Administration dated February 1, 1984 and the water
surface profiles and flood boundaries and flood maps therein
are made a part of the official zoning map and this Ordinance.
b.
Interpretation. Where there appears to be a conflict between
a mapped flood plain boundary and actual field conditions, the
City Council shall make the necessary interpretation based on
elevations of the regional (100 year) flood profile and other
available data. Anyone contesting the location of the
boundaries shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present
technical evidence and their case to the City Council.
-
c. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by
this ordinance to repeal, abrogate or impair any existing
easements, covenants or deed restrictions. However, where this
ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this
ordinance shall control. All other ordinances inconsistent
with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the
inconsistency only.
d. Warning and Disclaimer of Liability: This ordinance does not
imply that areas outside the flood plain districts or land uses
permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or
flood damage. This ordinance shall not create liability on
the part of the City of Stillwater or any of its officers or
employees for any flood damage that results from reliance on
this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made.
e.
Severability: If any section, clause, provision or portion
of this ordinance is decided unconstitutional or invalid by
a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this
e
1
ordinance shall not be affected.
3.
Definitions. Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases
used in this Ordinance shall have the same meaning as they have in
common usage in order as to give this Ordinance its most reasonable
application. !
e
a.
Accessoty Use of Buildings - A subordinate use of buildings
customatily incident to and located on the same lot as the
principte building or use.
b.
Administrative Use Permit - A permit issued by the Community
Develop~ent Director for a use or building.
I
Basement. Any area of a structure including crawl space,
having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all
four s~des regardless of depth of excavation below ground
level. I
i
Develop~ent. Any manmade change to improved or unimproved
land, ipcluding but not limited to buildings or structures,
mining,i dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation,
drillin~ operations or storage of equipment or materials.
I
Equal degree of Encroachment. A method of determining the
locatio~ of floodway boundaries so that flood plain lands on
both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate
share of flood flows.
e
c.
d.
e.
f. Flood. A temporary increase in the flow of a stream or water
level qf a lake that results in the inundation of normally
dry arers.
g. Flood Ftequency. The frequency for which it is expected that
a spec:)..fic flood stage or discharge may be equalled or
exceeded.
!
h. Flood Fringe. That portion of the flood plain outside of the
floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway
fringe" used in the Flood Insurance study for Stillwater.
For the st. Croix River, the Flood Fringe includes the flood
plain a~ea between the ordinary high water mark of the river
and th~' outer limits of the flood plain. For other water
bodies he Flood Fringe includes the area between the ordinary
high w~ er mark and the designated flood plain.
I
i. Flood Plain. The river beds and land adjoining a watercourse
which h~ve been or may be covered by a regional flood.
j.
Flood ~roofing. A combination of structural provisions,
changesl or adjustments to properties and structures subject
to flodding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of
e
2
e
flood damage.
k.
Flood Plain Overlay District. A special zoning district that
regulates development in the flood plain in addition to the
underlay zoning regulations.
1. Floodway. The channel of the water course and those portions
of the adjoining flood plain which are required to carry and
discharge the regional flood. For the st. Croix River, the
floodway is defined as the river or lake area delineated by
the ordinary high water mark. For Lily lake, Brick Pond and
McKusick Lake, the floodway boundary is indicated on the flood
map or designated based on a special study approved by the DNR
and City Council.
m. Freeboard. The factor of safety usually expressed in feet
above a flood level for purposes of flood plain management.
(Freeboard compensates for the many unknown factors that could
contribute to flood heights greater than the height calculated
for selected size flood and floodway conditions, such as wave
action, bridge openings and the hydrological effect of
urbanization of the watershed. One foot of freeboard is
included in the regulatory flood elevation.)
n. Historic structure. Any structure that is:
e
1.
Individually listed on the state Registry of Historic
Sites
2. Locally designated as an individual property or as a
contributing element of a historic district by the
Stillwater City Council through the process established
by the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Ordinance. The
Stillwater heritage preservation program was certified
by the Minnesota state Historic Preservation Office and
the Department of the Interior on January 29, 1988.
o. New Construction. structures for which the start of
construction commenced on or after the effective date of the
flood plain management regulations.
p. Obstructions. Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike,
pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel, modification,
culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill
structure or matter in, along, across or projecting into any
channel, watercourse or regulatory flood plain which may
impede, retard or change the direction of the flow of water,
either by itself or by catching or collecting debris carried
by the flow.
q.
Ordinary High Water Mark. A mark delineating the highest water
level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time
e
3
v.
to leav~ evidence upon the landscape. The ordinary high water
mark is l.1sually that point where the natural vegetation changes
from predominately aquatic to predominately terrestrial.
r. Principal Use or structure. All uses or structures that are
not accessory uses or structures.
s.
Reach. ~ hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal
segment!of a stream or river influenced by a natural or manmade
obstruc~ion. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or
river ~etween two consecutive bridge crossings would most
typical~y constitute a reach.
I
RegiOna~ Flood. A flood which is representative of large
floods I known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and
reason~ly characteristic of what can be expected to occur on
an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100-year
recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the
term tlb~. se flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study.
Regulat ry Flood Protection Elevation. The Regulatory Flood
Protec ion Elevation shall be an elevation one foot above
regional flood level plus any increased in flood elevation
caused jby encroachments on the flood plain that result from
design~tion of a floodway.
I
specia~ Use Permit (Conditional Use Permit). A use listed as
a spec~al use or conditional use in the zoning district
regulations that may be approved only after reviewing the
following criteria and finding that the use is not injurious
to theineighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public
welfar~i and is in harmony with the general purposes of this
ordina ceo
1. he character and use of both adjoining and proximate
tand and buildings.
2. the amount of traffic to be generated by the proposed
*se.
t.
u.
3.
The amount of noise, odor and glare which would emanate
trom the proposed use.
i
the need for the screening of parking, loading, storage
~eas and other outdoor activities of the proposed use.
~ir pollution control and solid waste storage and
~isposal measures.
I
~ther factors and conditions deemed to be important in
the consideration of the request for a special or
conditional use permit.
4.
5.
6.
4
e
-
e
e
w.
structure. Anything constructed or erected on the ground or
attached to the ground including, but not limited to,
buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins,
manufactured homes or above ground utilities.
x. Substantial Damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a
structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its
before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of
the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.
y. Substantial Improvement. Any reconstruction, rehabilitation,
addition or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which
equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the
structure before the "start of construction" of the
improvement. This term includes structures which have incurred
"substantial damage", regardless of the actual repair work
performed. The term does not, however, include either:
1. Any project for improvement of a structure to correct
existing violations of state or local health, sanitary
or safety code specifications which have been identified
by the local code enforcement official and which are the
minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions or
2.
Any alteration of a "historic structure" provided that
the alteration will not preclude the structure's
continued designation as a "historic structure".
e
z. Variance. A modification of a development standard required
in the zoning ordinance including this Ordinance to allow an
alternative development standard not stated as acceptable,
but only as applied to a particular property for the purpose
of alleviating a hardship, practical difficulty or unique
circumstances.
5. General. All new construction or substantial improvements hereafter
constructed within the Flood Plain Overlay District shall meet these
requirements or adhere to standard flood-proofing techniques and
practices as required by this ordinance, by the State of Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and by the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers up to the Flood Protection Elevation.
6.
Flood Proofing. Where flood proofing is incorporated into new
construction or substantial improvements to existing structures,
flood proofing measures shall be provided to the Flood Protection
Elevation and designed to withstand flood velocities, depths,
durations, forces and any other factors associated with the regional
flood. A plan or document certified by a registered professional
engineer or architect that the flood proofing measures are adequately
designed to withstand regional flood conditions shall be submitted
to the City for approval before authorization is granted for the
e
5
proposed work. Authorized flood proofing measures shall include such
provisions as the anchorage of structures to prevent floatation, the
installation of watertight barriers over openings, the reinforcement
of walls to resist water pressures, the use of material to reduce
wall seepage, the construction or modification of water supply and
waste disposal systems to prevent entry of flood waters, the
placement of ~ssential utilities above the flood protection elevation
and subsurfac~ drainage.
e
7.
Electrical an~ heating equipment within these structures shall be
at or above the flood protection elevation for the site or shall be
adequately flrOd proofed.
Establishmentl of Zoning District.
!
a.
New corstruction or substantial improvements within the
floodwa~ or flood fringe shall be in full compliance with the
terms o~ this ordinance.
I
I
The flotd plain areas within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance
are he~bY divided into two districts: Floodway District (FW)
and Fl d Fringe (FF).
1. loodway District. The Floodway District shall include
~ose areas designated as floodway.
2. ~lood Fringe. The Flood Fringe District shall include
~hose areas outside of the floodway designated as
Qnnumbered A Zones on the Flood Insurance Rate Map.
-
b.
8.
c. The bo~ndaries of these districts are shown on the Official
ZOning~Map. Within these districts all uses not allowed as
permit ed uses or permissible as conditional uses or special
uses s all be prohibited.
!
I
Floodway Dis1rict (FW).
a. permitJed Uses. The following uses have a low flood damage
potent~al and do not obstruct flood flows. These uses shall
be pe~itted within the Floodway District to the extent that
they ~e not prohibited by any other Ordinance and provided
they dj. not require structures, fill or storage of materials
or equ'pment. In addition, no use shall adversely affect the
capaci y of the channels or floodways or any tributary to the
main s ream or of any drainage ditch or any other drainage
facili~y or system.
i
I
1. 4gricultural uses such as general farming, pasture,
Qrazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, forestry
~d wild crop harvesting.
!
~esidentiallawns, gardens, parking areas and play areas.
e
2.
6
e
3.
Private and public recreational uses such as picnic
grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks,
wildlife and nature preserves, fishing areas, and single
or multiple purpose recreational trails.
b. Conditional Uses. The following open spaces uses that require
an accessory structure (temporary or permanent) or fill or
storage of materials or equipment may be permitted in the
Floodway District only after the issuance of a Conditional Use
Permit. These uses are also subject to the provisions of
Section c, Standards for Floodway Permitted or Conditional
Uses.
1.
2.
3,
4.
5.
e 6.
Structures accessary to open space uses.
Placement of fill.
Extraction of sand, gravel and other materials.
Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves and water
control structures.
Campgrounds; tents or vehicles.
Structure works for flood control such as levees, dikes
and floodwalls constructed to a height where the intent
is to protect park lands for a flood frequency of 20
years or less.
7. Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines
and pipelines.
8. Storage yards for equipment, machinery or materials.
9. other uses similar in nature to uses described in
Sections a and b which are similar to these uses.
c. Standards for Floodway Permitted or Conditional Uses.
1. All Uses. No structures, temporary or permanent, fill,
including fill for roads and levees, deposit,
obstruction, storage of materials or equipment or other
uses may be allC?wed as a permitted, conditional use
which, alone or in combination adversely affects the
capacity of the floodway or increases flood heights.
In addition, all floodway uses shall be subject to the
following standards.
d. Fill.
e
1.
Any fill deposited in the floodway shall be no more than
7
the mlnlffium amount necessary to conduct a conditional ~
use listed in Section b Conditional Uses. Generally, ~
fill shall be limited to that needed to grade or
landscape that use and shall not in any way obstruct
the flow of flood waters.
2. Spoil from dredging or sand and gravel operation shall
not be deposited in the floodway unless it can be done
in accordance with (a) of this section.
3. Fill shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover.
e. AcCeSSO~y Structures, temporary or permanent, permitted as
conditi$nal uses by (b) conditional uses.
I
I
1. Accessory structures shall not be designed for human
habitation.
2. AGcessory structures, shall be constructed and placed
o~ the site with the minimum obstruction to the flow of
ftoOd waters.
a~
I
bl
I
Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed
with the longitudinal axis parallel to the
direction of flood flow, and
If practical, structures shall be placed
approximately on the same flood flow lines as those
of adjoining structures.
e
c Accessory structures shall be elevated on fill or
be structurally dry flood proofed in accordance
with the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing
classifications in the State Building Code. As
an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood
proofed to the FP-3 or FP-4 flood proofing
classification in the State Building Code provided
the accessory structure constitutes a minimal
investment and does not exceed 500 square feet in
size. A detached garage must be used solely for
parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood
proofed accessory structures must meet the
following additional standards, as appropriate:
1. The structure must be adequately anchored
to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral
movement of the structure and shall be
designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces
on exterior walls; and
2.
Any mechanical and utility equipment in a
structure must be elevated to or above the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or
e
8
e
-
e
properly flood proofed.
f.
storage of materials and equipment.
1. The storage or processing of material that are in time
of flooding, flammable, explosive or potentially
injurious to human, animal or plant life is prohibited.
2. storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed
if readily removable from the area within the time
available after a flood warning and in accordance with
a plan approved by the City Council.
g. structural works for flood control that will change the course,
current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters
shall be subject to the provisions of Minnesota statute,
Chapter 103G. Community-wide structural works for flood
control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood
plain may not be allowed in the floodway.
h. A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway shall
not cause an increase to the 100-year or regional flood and
the technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage
loss on both sides of a stream.
9.
Flood Fringe District (FF).
a. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be those uses of land
or structures listed as permitted uses in the Floodway District
or in the underlying zoning use district. All permitted uses
shall comply with the standards for Floodway Permitted Uses
listed in Section 8(c) above and the "Standards for all Flood
Fringe Permitted Uses" listed in Section (b) below.
b. Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses:
1. All structures, including accessory structures, must be
elevated on fill so that the lowest floor including
basement floor is at or above the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation. The finished fill elevation for
structures shall be no lower than one (1) foot below the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and the fill shall
extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet
beyond the outside limits of the structures erected
thereon.
2.
As an alternative to elevation on fill, accessory
structure that constitute a minimal invastrnent and that
do not exceed 500 square feet for the outside dimension
at ground level may be internally flood proofed in
accordance with Section 8(e)(2)(c).
9
3.
The cumulative placement of 1,000 cubic yards of fill
on a development si te shall be allowable only as a
Conditional Use, unless the fill is specifically intended
to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 9(a)
qf this ordinance.
e
4. ~he storage of any materials or equipment shall be
~levated on fill to the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation.
5.
c.
~he provisions of Section 9(e) of this ordinance shall
~pply.
condit~onal Uses. Any structure that is not elevated on fill
or flodd proofed in accordance with Section 9(b)(1 and 2) or
any use of land that does not comply with the standards in
sectio~ 9(b)(3 and 4) shall only be allowable as a Conditional
Use. ~ application for a Conditional Use Permit shall be
subjec~ to the standards and criteria and evaluation
proce~~res specified in Section 9(d) and Section 14 of this
ordin=te .
Stand~ds for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses:
i
;ternative elevation methods other than the use of fill
ay be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor
ove the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. These
i11ternative methods may include the use of stilts,
ilings, parallel walls or above-grade, enclosed areas
uch as crawl spaces or tuck under garages. The base
loor of an enclosed area shall be considered above-
rade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if:
) the enclosed area is above-grade on at least one side
f the structure; 2) it is designed to internally flood
~nd is constructed with flood resistant material; and
~) it is used solely for parking of vehicles, building
qccess or storage. The alternative elevation methods
~isted above are subject to the following additional
standards:
e
d.
1.
,.
Design and Certification. The structure's design
and as-built condition must be certified by a
registered professional engineer or architect as
being in compliance with the design standards of
the State Building Code and that all electrical,
heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning
equipment and other service facilities must be at
or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation
or be designed to prevent flood water from entering
or accumulating within these components during
times of flooding.
e
10
e
b.
Specific Standards for Above-grade, Enclosed Areas .
Above-grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl
spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to
internally flood and the design plans must
stipulate:
1. The minimum area of openings in the walls
where internal flooding is to be used as a
flood proofing technique. When openings are
placed in a structure I s walls to provide for
entry of flood waters to equalize pressures,
the bottom of all openings shall be no higher
than one-foot above grade. Openings may be
equipped with screens, louvers, valves or
other coverings or devices provided that they
permit the automatic entry and exit of flood
waters.
2. That the enclosed area will be designed by
flood resistant materials in accordance with
the FP-3 or FP-4 classifications in the State
Building Code and shall be used solely for
building access, parking of vehicles or
storage.
2. Basements.
e
a.
Residential basement construction are not allowed
below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
b. Nonresidential basements may be allowed below the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation provided the
basement is structurally dry flood proofed in
accordance with this Ordinance.
3. All areas of nonresidential structures including
basements to be placed below the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation shall be flood proofed in accordance
with the structurally dry flood proofing classifications
in the State Building Code. Structurally dry flood
proofing must meet the FP-1 or FP-2 flood proofing
classification in the State Building Code and this shall
require making the structure watertight with the walls
substantially impermeable to the passage of water and
with structural components having the capability of
resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the
effects of buoyancy. Structures flood proofed to the
FP-3 or FP-4 classification shall not be permitted.
4.
When at anyone time more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill
or other similar material is located on a parcel for such
activities as on-site storage, landscaping, sand and
gravel operations, landfills, roads, dredge spoil
e
11
diisposal or construction of flood control works, an
erosion/sedimentation control plan must be submitted. 4It
The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to
stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum
of 100 year or regional flood event. The plan must be
p~epared and certified by a registered professional
engineer. The plan may incorporate alternative
procedures for removal of the material from the flood
plain if adequate flood warning time exists.
5.
sr.orage of Materials and Equipment:
a. The storage or processing of hazardous materials
that are, in time of flooding, flanunable, explosive
or potentially injurious to human, animal or plant
life is prohibited.
b. storage of other materials or equipment may be
allowed if readily removable from the area within
the time available after a flood warning and in
accordance with a plan approved by the city
Council.
6.
~he prOV1Slons of Section 9(e) of this ordinance shall
ailso apply.
e. Standards for All Flood Fringe Uses:
e
1.
All new principal structures must have vehicular access
at or above an elevation not more than two (2) feet below
tjhe Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. If a variance
to this requirement is granted, the City Council must
~pecify limitations on the period of use or occupancy
qf the structure for times of flooding and only after
qetermining that adequate flood warning time and local
~lood emergency response procedures exist.
2. Commercial uses. Accessory land uses, such as yards,
railroad tracks and parking lots may be at elevations
lower than the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
However, a permit for such facilities to be used shall
~ot be granted in the absence of a flood warning system
~hat provides adequate time for evacuation if the area
~ould be inundated to a depth greater than two feet or
Qe subject to flood velocities greater than four feet
~er second upon occurrence of the regional flood.
i
Manufacturing and Industrial Uses. Measures shall be
~aken to minimize interference with normal operations
~long streams having protracted flood durations. Certain
4ccessory land uses such as yards and parking lots may
~e at lower elevations subject to requirements set out
in Section 9(e)(2) above. In considering permit
I
3.
e
12
e
applications, due consideration shall be given to needs
of an industry whose business requires that it be located
in flood plain areas.
4.
Fill shall be properly compacted and the slopes shall
be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative
cover or other acceptable method. The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for
removing the special flood hazard area designation for
certain structures property elevated to fill about the
lOa-year flood elevation FEMA's requirements
incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope
protection standards for multi-structure or multi-lot
developments. These standards should be investigated
prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change
of special flood hazard area designation will be
requested.
5.
Flood plain developments shall not adversely affect the
hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining flood
plain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system
where a floodway or other encroachment has not been
specified on the official zoning map.
10. Subdivision of Land.
e
a.
No Land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the
City Council for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water
supply or sewage treatment facilities. All lots within the
flood plain districts shall contain a required building site
area at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation.
All subdivisions shall have City water and sewage services
and have road access both to the subdivision and to the
individual building sites no lower than two feet below the
regulatory flood protection elevation. In the Flood Plain
District, applicants shall provide the information required
in No. 14 of this section below. The City Council shall
eva;Luate the section in accordance with procedures established
in No. 14 below.
b. No land in the Floodway shall be subdivided for development
purposes.
c. The Region Flood Plain Elevation shall be clearly labeled on
all access roads and platted lots.
11. Manufactured Homes and Manufactured Horne Parks, Travel Trailer,
Travel Vehicles.
a.
e
The permanent placement of manufactured homes, manufactured
home parks and travel trailer and travel vehicles outside of
an approved campground shall not be permitted in the Flood
13
12.
13.
Plain. I
Public utilities, Railroads, Roads and Bridges
e
a.
Public r. tilities. All public utilities and facilities such
as gas, electrical, sewer and water supply systems to be
located in the flood plain shall be flood-proofed in accordance
with t~e state Construction Codes or elevated to above the
Regulatpry Flood Protection Elevation.
Public ~ransportation Facilities. Railroad tracks, roads and
bridges~to be located within the flood plain shall comply with
Section 8 and 9 of this Ordinance. Elevation to the Regulatory
Flood P otection Elevation shall be provided where failure or
interruption of these transportation facilities would result
in danser to the public heal th or safety or where such
facilit~es are essential to the orderly functioning of the
area. ~inor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed
at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of
transpo~tation services would not endanger the public health
or safe~y.
On site, sewage treatment and water supply system shall not be
allowe~ in the Flood Plain District. City utility. services
must bel provided.
b.
c.
Nonconforming Uses.
e
a. A structure or the use of a structure or premises which was
lawful before the passage or amendment of this section but
which is not in conformity with the provisions of this section
may
be Icontinued subject to the following conditions:
~o such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged or
altered in a way which increases its nonconformity.
!
No structural alteration or addition to any nonconforming
structure over the life of the structure shall exceed
50 percent of its market value unless the entire
structure is permanently changed to a conforming use or
~nless the alteration or addition would substantially
rjeduce potential flood damages for the entire structure.
Jny substantial improvement or addition to a
~~nconfOrming use which would result in substantially
~ncreasing the flood damage potential of that use shall
~e flood proofed in accordance with the state Building
dode.
I
1.
2.
3.
4.
~f any nonconforming use or structure is destroyed by
~ny means, including floods, to an extent of 50 percent
qf more of its market value at the time of destruction,
I
I
I
e
14
e
it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with
the provisions of this ordinance. The applicable
provisions for establishing new uses or new structures
in Sections 8 or 9 will apply depending upon whether the
use or structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe.
5,
If any nonconforming use is discontinuous for twelve (12)
consecutive months, any future use of the building
premises shall conform to the use provisions of this
ordinance.
14. Administration.
e
e
a. Administrative Review. The City Council shall be the board
of adjustment and hear and decide appeals where it is alleged
there is error in any order, requirement, decision or
determination made by a Community Development Director in the
enforcement or administration of this Ordinance.
b.
Variances. The City Council may authorize upon appeal in
specific cases such relief or variance from the terms of this
Ordinance as will not be contrary to the public interest and
only for those circumstances such as hardship, practical
difficulties or circumstances unique to the property under
consideration, as provided for in the respective enabling
legislation for planning and zoning for cities or counties as
appropriate. In the granting of such variance, the City
Council shall clearly identify in writing the specific
conditions that existed consistent with the criteria specified
in the respective enabling legislation which justified the
granting of the variance. No variance shall have the effect
of allowing in any district uses prohibited in that district,
permit a lower degree of flood protection than the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation for the particular area, or permit
standards lower than those required by state law.
c. Hearings. Upon filing with the City Council of an appeal from
a decision of the Community Development Director or an
application for a variance, the City Council shall fix a
reasonable time for a hearing and give due notice to the
parties in interest as specified by law. The City Council
shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources,
a copy of the application for proposed variances sufficiently
in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten
(10) days notice of the hearing.
d.
Decisions. The City Council shall arrive at a decision on such
appeal or variance with 60 days. In passing upon an appeal,
the City Council may, so long as such action is in conformity
with the provisions of this Ordinance, reverse or affirm,
wholly or in part or modify the order, requirement, decision
or determination of the Community Development Director. It
15
e.
shall make its decision in writing setting forth the findings
of fact and the reasons for its decisions. In granting a
variance, the city Council may prescribe appropriate conditions
and Saff. guards such as those specif ied in Section 1 below which
are in conformity with the purposes of this ordinance.
Violatipns of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part
of the ,terms under which the variance is granted, shall be
deemed ~ violation of this ordinance punishable under Section
17. AI copy of all decisions granting variances shall be
forward~d by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources
within fen (10) days of such action.
Appeals. Appeals from any decision of the City Council may
be made and as specified in Minnesota Statutes.
I
I
Conditi~nal Uses. The City Council shall hear and decide
applica~ions for conditional uses permissible under this
ordinan~e. Applications shall be submitted to the Community
Develop~ent Director who shall forward the application to the
City corncil for consideration.
I
Hearingls. Upon filing with the City Council application for
a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall submit by mail
to thI Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the
applic ion for proposed conditional use sufficiently in
advanc so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten (10)
days n Itice of the hearing.
f.
g.
h. Decisions. The City Council shall arrive at a decision on a
Conditi;onal Use Permit within 60 days. In granting a
condit~onal Use Permit the City Council shall prescribe
approp iate conditions and safeguards, in addition to those
specif.ed in Section 1 below which are in conformity with the
purpos~s of this ordinance. Violations of such conditions and
safegu9rds, when made a part of the terms under which the
condit~onal Use Permit is granted, shall be deemed a violation
of thisl ordinance and punishable under Section 17. A copy of
all debisions granting Conditional Use Permits shall be
forwar~ed by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources
within It en (10) days of such action.
i
i. Procedures to be followed by the City Council in passing on
a Cond~tional Use Permit applications within all Flood Plain
Distriqts:
I
1. ~equire the applicant to furnish the following
~nformation and additional information as deemed
qecessary by the Community Development Director for
qetermining the suitability of the particular site for
~he proposed use:
Cl,.
Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing the
16
e
e
e
e
e
e
nature, location, dimensions and elevation of the
lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage
of materials, flood proofing measures and the
relationship of the above to the location of the
floodway or flood plain.
b.
Specifications for building construction and
materials, flood proofing, filling dredging,
grading, channel improvement, storage of materials,
water supply and sanitary facilities.
2, Transmi t one copy of the information described in
subsection (a) to a designated engineer or other expert
person or agency for technical assistance, where
determined by the Community Development Director, in
evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood
heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage
to the use, the adequacy of the plans for protection and
other technical matters.
3. Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated
engineer or expert, the City Council shall determine the
specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the
suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood
hazard.
j.
The following are factors upon which the decision of the City
Council shall be based. In passing upon conditional use
applications, the City Council shall consider all relevant
factors specified in other sections of this ordinance and:
1. The danger to life and property due to increased flood
heights or velocities caused by encroachments.
2. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands
or downstream to the injury of others or they may block
bridges, culverts or other hydraulic structures.
3. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and
the ability of these systems to prevent disease,
contamination and unsanitary conditions.
4. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its
contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage
on the individual owner.
5. The importance of the services provided by the proposed
facility to the community.
6.
The requirements of the facility for a waterfront
location.
17
7,
The availability of alternative locations not subject
to flooding for the proposed used.
e
8.
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing
development and development anticipated in the
foreseeable future.
9.
'lj'he relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive
~lan and flood plain management program for the area.
10,
The safety of access to the property in times of flood
10r ordinary emergency vehicles.
jhe expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise
cl.nd sediment transport of the flood waters expected at
1he site.
~uch other factors which are relevant to the purposed
4f this ordinance.
11.
12.
k.
Time f1r Acting on Application. The City Council shall act
on an ~Plication in the manner described above within 60 days
from receiving the application, except that where additional
inform;tion is required. The City Council shall render a
writte decision within 60 days from the receipt of such
additi nal information.
I
conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon
consid~ration of the factors listed above and the purpose of
this O~dinance, the City Council shall attach such conditions
to thl' granting of Conditional Use Permits as it deems
necess ry to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such
condit ons may include, but are not limited to, the following:
I
e
1.
1.
limitations on period of use, occupancy and operation.
I
fmposition of operational controls, sureties and deed
restrictions.
2.
3.
,
I
I
~equirements for construction of channel modifications,
~ompensatory storage, dikes, levees and other protective
teasures.
tlood-prOOfing measures, in accordance with the State
~uilding Code and this ordinance. The applicant shall
~ubmit a plan or document certified by a registered
f'rofessional engineer or architect that the flood-
roofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory
lood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors
for the particular area.
4.
e
18
e
15.
e
e
Administrative Use Permit.
a. Administrative Use Permit Required. An Administrative Use
Permit issued by the Community Development Director in
conformity with the provisions of this section shall be secured
prior to the erection, addition or alteration of any building,
structure or portion thereof; prior to the use or change of
use of a building, structure or land; prior to the change or
extension of a nonconforming use; and prior to the placement
of fill or excavation of materials or the storage of materials
or equipment within the flood plain.
b. Application for Administrative Use Permit. Application for
an administrative use permit shall be made in duplicate to the
Community Development Director and shall include the following
where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing
the nature, location, dimensions and elevations of the lot;
existing or proposed structures, fill or storage of materials;
and the location of the foregoing in relation to the floodway
or flood plain.
c.
state and Federal Permits. Prior to granting an administrative
use permit or processing an application for an Administrative
Use Permit or Variance, the Community Development Director
shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary
state and Federal permits.
d.
Certificate of Zoning Compliance for new construction,
substantial improvements or nonconforming use. It shall be
unlawful to use, occupy or permit the use or occupancy of any
building or premises or part thereof hereafter created,
erected, changed, converted, altered or enlarged in its use
of structure until a Certif icate of Zoning Compliance has have
been issued by the Community Development Director stating that
the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements
of this section. Where a nonconforming use of structure is
extended or substantially improved, the Certificate of Zoning
Compliance shall specifically state the manner in which the
nonconforming structure or use differs from the provisions of
this section.
e. Construction and Use to be as Provided in the Application,
Plans, Permits and Certificate of Zoning Compliance.
Administrative Use Permits, Conditional Use Permits or
Certificates of Zoning Compliance issued on the basis of
approved plans and applications authorize only the use,
arrangement and construction set forth in the approved plans
and applications and no other use, arrangement or construction.
Any use, arrangement or construction at variance with that
authorization shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance
and punishable as provided in Section 17.
19
16.
f.
Certification. The applicant shall be required to submit a
certification by a registered professional engineer, registered
architect or registered land surveyor that the finished fill
and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with
the provisions of the approved plans and this section. Flood-
proofing measures shall be certified by a registered
profes~ional engineer or registered architect.
e
g. Record 'of First Floor Elevation. The Community Development
Directc?r shall maintain a record of the elevation of the first
floor (iincluding basement) of all new structures or substantial
improv~ments to existing structures in the flood plain
distriqts. He shall also maintain a record of the elevations
to which structures or additions to structures are flood-
proofeq..
Variances.
a.
i
I
varian~es may be issued by the City Council for the repair or
rehabi itation of historic structures upon a determination by
the S illwater Heritage Preservation Commission that the
propos.d repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the
struct~res continued designation as a historic structure and
the va:qiance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic
character and design of the structure.
I
I
e
b. Varian~es shall not be issued within any designated floodway
if any fLncrease in flood levels during the base flood discharge
would result.
c.
varianles shall only be issued upon a
varian e is the minimum necessary,
hazard to afford relief.
,
i
Varian~es shall only be issued upon:
determination that the
considering the flood
d.
e.
1. 4 showing of good and sufficient cause;
2. ! determination that failure to grant the variance would
result in exceptional hardship to the applicant;
3. + determination that granting of a variance will not
result in increased flood heights, additional threats
1'0 public safety, extraordinary public expense, create
uisances, cause fraud on or victimization of, the public
r conflict with existing local laws or Ordinances.
!
In pas~ing upon such variances, the City Council shall consider
all teFhnical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards
specifted in other section of this Ordinance, and:
I
the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands
to the injury of others;
the danger of life and property due to flooding or
i
e
1.
2.
20
erosion damage;
The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its
contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage
on the individual owner;
The importance of the services provided by the proposed
facility in the community;
The necessity of the facility of a waterfront location,
where applicable;
The availability of alternative locations for the
proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion
damage;
The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and
anticipated development;
The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive
plan and floodplain management program for that area;
The safety access to the property in times of flood for
ordinary and emergency vehicles;
The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise
and sediment transport of the floodwater and the effects
of wave action and allowance for debris expected at the
site;
11. The costs of providing governmental services during and
after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair
of public facilities and facilities such as sewer, gas,
electrical, water system and streets and bridges.
e 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
e
Variances may be granted for new construction and substantial
improvements to be erected on a lot of less than one-half acre
contiguous to or surrounded by lots with existing structures
constructed below the base flood level, provided subsection
(e) of this section has been fully considered and the land use
is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the Zoning
Ordinance.
f.
g. Upon consideration of the factors set forth in this section,
the City Council may attach such conditions to the granting
of variances as it deems necessary to further the purposes of
this ordinance or needed to protect the public health, safety
or welfare.
h. A City shall notify the applicant in writing over the signature
of the Community Development Director that the issuance of a
variance to construct a structure below the base flood level
will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up
to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage and
the construction below the base flood level increases risks
to life and property. The notification shall be maintained
with a record of all variance actions as required in paragraph
(16)(i) of this section; and
i.
e
The City shall maintain a record of all variance actions,
including justification for their issuance and report variances
21
issued in its annual or biennial report submitted to the a
Department of Natural Resources. ,.,
17. Amendments. The flood plain designation on the Official Zoning Map
shall not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown
that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled.
to above the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to
lands outside the flood plain. Special exceptions to this rule may
be permitted by the connnissioner of Natural Resources if he
determines t:pat, through other measures, lands are adequately
protected for the intended use.
All amendments to this Ordinance, including amendments to the
Official Zoning Map, must be submitted to and approved by the
Connnissioner bf Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes in the
Official Zoning Map must meet the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's (FEMA) Technical Conditions and Criteria and must receive
prior FEMA approval before adoption. The Connnissioner of Natural
Resources mus~ be given ten (10) days written notice of all hearings
to consider an amendment to this Ordinance and the notice shall
include a dra~t of the Ordinance amendment or technical study under
consideratioq.
18. Penalties for Violation.
a.
Violat~on of the provisions of this Ordinance or failure to
comply Iwith any of its requirements, including violations of
conditions of approval established in connection with grants
of Variances or Conditional Uses, shall constitute a
misdem~anor and shall be punishable as defined by law.
I
Nothin~ shall prevent the City of Stillwater from taking such
other ]awful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any
violat~on. Action may include but is not limited to:
e
b.
1. ~n responding to a suspected Ordinance violation, the
qity may utilize the full array of enforcement actions
~vailable to it including, but not limited to,
prosecution and fines, injunctions, after-the-fact
permits, orders for corrective measure or a request to
~he National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood
~nsurance availability to the guilty party. The City
IIfust act in good faith to enforce these official controls
a,nd to correct Ordinance violations to the extent
possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the
~ational Flood Insurance PRogram.
2.
I
When an Ordinance violation is either discovered by or
brought to the attention of the Community Development
Director, the Community Development Director shall
~ediately investigate the situation and document the
~ature and extent of the violation. As soon as is
e
22
e
e
e
reasonably possible, this information shall be submitted
to the appropriate Department of Natural Resources and
Federal Emergency Management Agency Regional Office along
with the City's plan to correct the violation.
3.
The Communi ty Development Director shall notify the
suspected party of the requirements of this Ordinance
and all other official controls and the nature and extent
of the suspected violation. If the structure or use is
under construction or development, the Community
Development Director may order the construction or
development immediately halted until a lawful permit or
approval is lawfully granted. If the construction or
development is already completed, then the Community
Development Director may either 1) issue an order
identifying the corrective action that must be made
within a specified time period to bring the use or
structure into compliance. 2) Grant approval within a
spec if ied period of time not to exceed thirty (30) days.
4.
If the responsible party does not appropriately respond
to the Community Development Director within the
specified period of time, each additional day that lapses
shall constitute an additional violation of this
Ordinance and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The
Community Development Director shall also upon the lapse
of the specified response period notify the landowner
to restore the land to the condition which existed prior
to the violation of this Ordinance.
23
..
MEMORANDUM
e
TO:
Mayor and city Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director and Diane Deblon, Finance
Director
DA: October 28, 1991
RE: ASSISTANCE FOR PRIVATE COSTS OF UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND FACADE
IMPROVEMENTS
A Downtown utility Connection Assistance Program is described below. The
program has two phases. The first, utility connection assistance is to provide
aid in the form of grants to property pwners for the immediate cost of utility
connection caused by the 1991 Downtown Improvement Plan. A Second Phase will
provide loan assistance for downtown building facade improvements.
Examples of how the program will work are shown below. The utility program is
for the connection of water, fire service, storm sewer, sanitary sewer or
electrical to the community service system and not up grades to the existing
system needing repair. This will be determined by the description of the work
and follow up inspection by public works or building officials if necessary.
e
The City installed and paid for fire and sewer services to properties along
Water, Chestnut, Myrtle and Main Streets where the streets were reconstructed.
This cost of the connections for one (1) fire and one (1) sewer service was
approximately $3,000 and would be credited toward City assistance. Below are
examples of how assistance levels would be determined:
Amount*
utility Cost* % Assistance Assistance Owner Cost
Example 1 $ 5,000 25% $ 1,250 $ 3,750
Example 2 $10,000 25%/50% $ 3,750 $ 6,250
Example 3 $15,000 25%/50%/75% $ 7,500 $ 7,500
Example 4 $25,000 25%/50%/75% $15,000 $10,000
*utility costs and assistance amounts would be dependent on whether fire or
sewer connections were installed and paid by the City.
As you can see from the examples, the purpose of the program is to reduce the
cost of connections for the high expense properties. In preconstruction
discussion, it was estimated that high expense connection properties could be
as much as $10,000. The program assistance level was based on questionnaires
received from property owners describing their utility connections and available
TIF funds.
It is estimated that this level of assistance for Phase I utility Connections
would cost between $100,000 and $200,000. This has been anticipated in the
planning for use of TIF funds. Funds are not currently available to implement
Phase II loan assistance.
e
Recommendation:
Consideration and approval of utility Connection Assistance Program.
e
e
e
A:
STILLWATER UTILITY CONNECTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
1.
Eligible Participants
A. Property owners with properties located in the TIF Development
District #1 (Downtown). All properties would be evaluated by
individual parcel. (OWners of more than one (1) parcel would need
to submit applications for each parcel.)
II. Eligible Activities
A. Phase I utility Connections - Installation and connection of owners
building water, sewer, storm sewer or electrical systems to community
service systems and related public health and safety required
improvements (any upgrades to existing systems not required by state
or local codes shall be the owners responsibility and do not qualify
for assistance).
B. Phase II Building Facade Improvement - Repair exterior walls,
windows, awnings, lighting, signs, doors, decorative detailing
consistent with Downtown Design Guidelines.
C.
Design Service - Architectural design or structure engineering
services for preparation of plans and specifications for building
facade improvements.
III. Assistance
Phase I
A. Grants - Grants are available for utility connections required by
the Downtown Improvement Project, L.1. 257. Terms of the grants are
the following:
Eligible utility Connection Costs*
% of City Assistance*
First $ 0 - $5,000
Next $5,000
Next $15,000
25%
50%
75% of cost up to
$15,000 maximum
* utility costs and City assistance shall include cost of fire and
storm sewer connections paid by the City.
Phase II
B. Loans - Loans are available for eligible facade improvements.
1. Amount - 35% of improvement cost up to $15,000.
2.
Term of loan - Loan amortized at 5% over 10 year period
maximum. Payable monthly.
e
r illwater
~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA IJ
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: ANN PUNG-TERWEDO, PLANNER
DATE: OCTOBER 30, 1991
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF BENCHES FOR DEDICATION PLAQUES
e
BACKGROUND
The City has purchased twelve benches for placement
throughout Downtown Stillwater. The cost for each bench was
$740.00.
DISCUSSION:
City Staff and some Council members have received calls and
letters regarding purchasing the benches in Downtown for
dedication, or memory of their friends or loved one. In
order to identify individuals, plaques must be purchased at
an estimated cost of $60.00 to mount on the bench.
BENCH PROGRAM:
Staff is recommending that the City receive contributions
for the benches for $500.00 in honor of that certain
individual. The City will then purchase the plaques for
$60.00 to mount on the bench. A revolving fund could then
be established to purchase future benches.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval to implement and promote the bench program.
e
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ~
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1991
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Oak Park Heights is proposing to annex 392 acres of land just south of County
Road #5 between Oak Park Heights on the east and County Road #5 on the west.
(See map.)
The proposed land use map shows commercial land use along Highway 36, public
and semi-public land along County Road #5 (new High School site) with some low
density residential further to the south. (See land use map.)
The area is serviced by County Road #5, Highway 36, Frontage Road and
Washington Avenue. Sewage service is provided by the Stillwater Treatment
Plant.
e
There is currently a large supply of vacant commercial and industrial land in
the Stillwater Business Park. It is questionable if the additional
commercially designated land is necessary to provide for projected employment
growth. Excess land supply can be expensive to local governments and property
owners because of the costs of providing services and maintenance of
facil i ti es.
Oak Park Heights is serviced by the Stillwater Sewer Treatment Plant. It is
critical to the City that there is adequate capacity to accommodate the
Stillwater development as well as new annexation development. (See comments
from Short, Elliott and Hendrickson.) .
Access to the annexation area is provided by Highway 36, Frontage Road, County
Road #5 and Wasilington Avenue. All these roads also provide access to the City
of Stillwater. It is important that the road system proposed in the plan be
adequate to handle future City of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights traffic
demand. This may require special planning through coordinated transportation
studies and capital improvement programs. (See comments from Short, Elliott
and Hendrickson. )
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Community Development Director to send a letter to the City of
Oak Park Heights regarding land supply, service capacity and traffic.
e
ATTACHMENT
- Comments from Short, Elliott and Hendrickson dated September 25, 1991 and
October 11, 1991.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
~ ': '~-,f~-: '~~>~~.~ J'-~r ~ - I ~ {Pirt!: '~F;;m\~'1ffiG;~~;rnt~~7
1 il ". L 't I' . : . I I "," .~ -r c..J . \ ~ I . c-s.. :. f f .
-------'--------------r /,,__________......1.<.-____.._......_. . ~ .', I I.' \ - . \,="-:u
., JY' ,;' . -- --::-.- -\- ~- ...- -.-.. .-.-; --.';'4-=.~.---.';'.".=.::.:::==-. "~:._::~-:,~--==.~.J~,~.:=.:h..=i=-=--:--:-./.-~--.::i:-~I'
. 'I . . . ~ / \ ..... : !; - - t., , .' ~. - . .' - i n.' -:-~.---=.-----" \
_____._ -r.---.'-./;::.--/I ______--. -.~.--..-..-----.. It . ....-' ~ I
/i''':.',- ~: II I . \ -~ .-. -. u-.r~ .---.-..--..." Wf '-~,----'-- -----r.. -----.~--- .'-~r' ----- -- L~~~(-
1/ '.........~' 1/ \. \ w.o - of" L....-...:"i <
I G;j / ~\::l )-i:'
C'...- _ L'~~~~/-'i--_uuuu \ rll_WM~"'~l--Q.A-'W'~RK. TGHTS \) ~i
. ,it;/ ANNEXATI~N AREA_ I _~! _ : - f~. Eft':
/1. .... ,. oM .! ~,~.::l~.~,:.l.:.:;';..n
"'y!/, ..J. (':'>., \ i4~~1m.mv4illll__W1~i..
,.1_.:_.,.::-:.:-_,,: ::::..:::_-,t.,i;'.,..,., :,,_..---;--.,-..1-.1, .._,:---;:,-.::.Ul,- -.. -- ... -, -. . . ,. .... ...' .. .'
/. " . I . : :i'
/../...~I \. . \ . . )]\ :H
1:1 ,_.' \ (:-.:'.......: \ UJ - I ;::..,
.~. 'J ...... . .' 1. '\ D L ;'\'\
/., 1 . ..,. , ", - '" '-. Q :...'.....:
'j \ : "" " . ,
, ., ~ ...,.'.,.....::.<:.. ,
(i . ": i:i;
Ili I ; \ .- :,l~l_
.\ l~2~L-.-~.. _.._."L...-- ....._....j ..... ~. 0 \.............,...:...,......~DL..., ..:..-...-/~~
':' '~'.,:.r:--~ ,')'/ I.
~I ~ ' :.;- !l . ..~ ~i 'i
--0 . ;,.: ~ ~/-v .-:: I
!~,' \:. :. .,,'!~~... 'j;
\ ... \ BAYTOWNTO NSI-tIP ...... .;~...r'!.-if,':..-:-...:j!.
/1 ~ /~~. " ~ \,..,,' '%1;;~\~ .' J . \ /ifu::\~ . \' ~:. ..) ..... ; ..;' . ., .. . . \; -" .. A ~. ~.: ~
.... \ \' . . \ .,r l ,,~~ :. . .;.' r.-=-i-" 'I..'::' ..~. . [
: ,: . '. \ . ",,[,,' .. . I of
....,. .~.' /1..,_ .,~,,' . A"'- . ~'.~~,.;\. \ ..... 1 ' \ i.i ~::./ r :; '.-' i.:,'.:..
.J f:'_.lJ......._~-:r\-..!=-. ~ ,;:,' '. ~" .L:L, ___.-------.:... \. I' 1;1 '.... ~..J
;..... ._::::0.. , _~.-:..~::"': ' :0 :--~~:~..
l-.~. e.~...
I fN"U.....1
nOCi.attd
A c.n",".nh. Inc.
.....
1:"""\,-[
--
o toO"' "0'
I ./ /
/t'" I
.j/)
r
~\
N
L'.,._.<..~..
;,'. "
1....,.._..:;..;..
."e
4t--J '
~
:~-~
1
.j
, (,
""..0..."",......
-------:-
~~' . .
"1,.~"",,,"04
". ,~,<_~..'J;
"..;-I.:.,'~
STILLWATER
UO'
. : ~ '.':.: ":. :
Annexation Area
Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
<.4.
"'~
0,.
I : -:--.; .liP ~\ ~
c~; ~wt~: ~r \\
1'--'; M .: .
~
~ljfe~9r~tl ~:::~::~:E."TV
HI ~ t..""1 H'GH DE."TV
~ minneJota ::::.: RESIDENTIAL
lm~ MULTIPLE FAMILY-
o 0 BUSINESS TRANSITION
II PUBLIC AND
SEMI-PUBLIC
l'
o 600 1600 No,l"
~ COMMERCIAL
m INDUSTRIAL
PROPOSED
LAND USE PLAN
. .
~ PUBLIC ~PEN. SPACE
......":/.".-.,.......1 I
~_c
1" nA~~anls.ine.
e
3
I, ,
e
e
. "'SeH
e ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNA/5 CENTER DRIVE, 5I PAUL, MINNE5arA 55110 612490.2000
October 11, 1991
RE: stillwater, Minnesota
Oak Park Heights
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
High School Annexation
Area
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of stillwater
216 North Fourth street
stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Steve:
We have reviewed the Sanitary Sewer Projections from the
CompJ::ehensi ve Plan Amerdment for the Oak Park Heights annexation of
the High School site.
e
The sanitary sewer for the annexation area will be directed to an
interceptor located at the intersection of TH 36 and Oakgreen
Avenue. This interceptor, flo'Yling westerly to the treatment plant,
picks up very little area in the City of stillwater. A small
segment of the southeast corner of the ci ty flows into the
interceptor downstream from the proposed connection.
The projected sewer flow of 261,280 gallons/day as shown in the
Plan Amendment were derived from generally accepted flow rates for
each type of development. Sewage flows, however, are never at a
constant flow throughout the day. Therefore, peak flows are
computed using a factor. In the case of an interceptor, a value or
multiplier of 2 should have been included. This would indicate a
Peak Flow of 522,560 gallons/day to the interceptor. The Plan
Amendment notes an excess capacity or 480,000 gallons/day available
in the pipe. The interceptor, therefore will reach its capacity to
carry a Peak Flow before the annexation area is fully developed.
We will be available to discuss this at the October 15, 1991
Council Meeting.
Sincerely
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
,-pI) -/)"
\~ -1 ~t--
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
e
BCP/bcp
5HORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICK50N INC
5T PAUL,
MINNE50TA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCON51N
e
"'SSi
MEMORANDUM
ENC/NEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 5S11O 612490-2000
TO:
STEVE RUSSELL, CITY ENGINEER
FROM:
CINDY GRAY, TRANSPORTATION PLANNER
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 25, 1991
SUBJECT: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
OAK PARK HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT:
HIGH SCHOOL SITE ANNEXATION AREA
SEH FILE NO. 89114
e
Thank you for the opportunity to review the comprehensive plan
amendment for the high school annexation area in the City of Oak
Park Heights. The orderly development of the land as proposed in
the comprehensive plan amendment will certainly preclude many of
the local problems which could occur as a result of poor land use
planning or lack of land use planning. Nevertheless, development
of this area will impact Stillwater through the increased traffic
volumes on the surrounding roadway network. It is important to
qualify these impacts in order to know the magnitude of the
changes which may result.
e
There are several transportation related concerns which we feel
should be researched and addressed at this stage in the planning
process. As you know, we have identified peak hour traffic
volume estimates for CSAH 5 at the intersection of the frontage
road, Curve Crest Boulevard and Orleans Drive. These volumes
were estimated for the purpose of analyzing intersection
capacity, spacing requirements and signal progression along CSAH
5 between Highway 36 and Orleans Street. We suggest that the
same approach be taken to analyze capacity and signal progression
along CSAH 5 south of TH 36. Since the land uses in the newly
annexed area have been identified in detail for the most part, a
traffic analysis which identifies trip generation and peak hour
turning movements to and from CSAH 5 should be relatively easy to
conduct.
SHORT EWOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
5T. PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALlS,
WISCONSIN
steve Russell
September 25, 1991
Page #2
e
The most recent pli,ans which Mn/DOT has prepared for the CSAH 5
bridge over TH 36 shows an east/west collector street much like
that shown in the comprehensive plan amendment. However, on the
Mn/DOT concept the frontage road which runs along the south side
of TH 36 is curved\to the south to intersect with this east/west
collector street ehst of CSAH 5. This is not reflected in the
comprehensive plan i amendment. Such a design would place all of
the traffic boun1 to and from the frontage road at the
intersection of th1 frontage road and the new collector street as
well as at the intersection of the collector street with CSAH 5.
Therefore, it is important to estimate the future peak hour
turning movement abd through volumes at CSAH 5/collector street
I
intersection to d~termine how this fits into the intersection
spacing requirements and signal progression along CSAH 5.
e
The comprehensive !plan amendment also mentions that the high
school site will take access from CSAH 5. Although a portion of
the high school's access will probably actually occur off of the
east/west collecto~ street along the north side of the site, it
is very likely t~at the school district will also want an
addi tional access point to the south directly from CSAH 5. If
this 1s 1:i1e" case, the intersection spacing and traffic signal
progression analysi\s should also take such an intersection into
account to determint its optimal location.
In addition, the in reased volume of traffic on Washington Avenue
I
as a result of devellopment in the newly annexed area in Oak Park
Heights should alsd be reviewed. Our particular concern is the
intersection of Was~ington Avenue with frontage roads both to the
i
north and south o~ TH 36 as well as the existing at-grade
intersection of was~ington Avenue and TH 36. The intersections
e
e
steve Russell
September 25, 1991
Page #3
of Washington Avenue with the frontage roads should also be
reviewed under the scenario of the future grade separated
intersection to determine whether or not the estimated traffic
volumes result in any problems related to capacity or design of
these intersections and/or the bridge.
CRG/cmb
e
e
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
City Coordinator
DA:
October 28, 1991
RE:
POLICY ON COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS/MEMBERSHIPS
Accompanying this memo is a policy I drafted regarding appointments to the
various boards, commissions and committees of the City. The draft policy is
accompanied by Exhibit "A" which provides some summary data pertaining to the
City's present commission. The summary includes residency qualifications, if
any, for members.
Residency requirements exist for some of the commissions but not for others.
The Council did, on January 8, 1991, move to limit membership to residents of
the City. However, this requirement, if it is to be a permanent one, should be
included in the ordinance or resolution that is used to create the commission.
The City Attorney should advise the Council on this matter. If time permits,
I would like to discuss the proposed policy at the meeting Tuesday.
Stillwater City Council M nutes
Regular Meeting
January 8, 1991
e
d. Heritage Preservation Commission
Council will make appointments to the Heritage Preservation Commission
a t the next regul ar meeti n9.
e. Park and Recreation Commission
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Funke to
reappoint Wayne Wohlers, Alan Liel1r and Jim Gannon to the Park and Recreation
Commission; to reappoint $teve Joyce if he desires to be reappointed; to
appoint Dick Blekum to th~ commission replacing Tom Thoreson and to appoint
Tom Lillesve if Steve Joy~e does not want to be reappointed, (All in favor).
f, Joint Cable Commission
Motion by Council member Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Funke to reappoint
Jackie Ulrich to the St. Croix Valley Central Joint Cable Commission. (All in
favor) .
Membership on City Botrds & Commissions to be Residents Only
Council discussion fo, lowed regarding the above issue, It was noted that
taxpayers in the dO\'lntown may not be residents and that some commissions
may require expertisel of individuals who do not live in the City.
I
Motion by Councilmember F~nke, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to limit
membership on City Boards and Commissions to residents of Stillwater, only.
(Ayes - 3; Nays - 2, Councilmembers Farrell and Opheim).
e
NEW BUSINESS
1. Electing a Vice President for Council.
Motion by Councl member B d OV1C , secon ed by Councilmember Opheim to appoint
Councilmember Farrell as ouncil Vice President. (All in favor).
CONSENT AGENDA I
Motion by Councilmember Ofheim, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve
the Consent Agenda of Jan~ary 8, 1991, including the following: (All in
favor). i .
1. Directing Payment of Sills. (Resolution No, 91-4).
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Funke, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
2. The Following License-:
Contractor's Licenses
General Contractor
Rene\-/a 1
Morton Buildings, Inc.
11935 Highway 95 N.E.
Foley, Mn. 56329
6
e
./
e
e
e
RECOMMENDED POLICY
ON COMMISSION APPOnrrMENTS
There currently exists in the city of Stillwater several citizen boards,
commissions and committees which are summarized on the attached Exhibit "A" and
which have been established to: assist the City Council in the exercise of its
duties and responsibilities and/or to carry out a specific function related to
city government.
These boards, commissions and committees (hereafter called "commissions") receive
their basic grant of authority, duties, rights and responsibilities by City
ordinance, by council resolution or simply by motion of the City Council. The
power and authority of each commission may vary depending on their purpose or
mission. However, each commission has been established to serve a common
objective and that is to help make local government responsive to all of its
citizens and citizen groups.
The quality of the commissions recommendations will usually be determined by
the qualifications the commission possesses as a whole. In view of the fact that
the issues city government faces are often complex and affect citizens, citizen
groups and other institutions in different ways, it becomes highly important that
commissions possess the wherewithal to effectively assist the City Council in
its decision making process. Therefore, it shall be the policy of the Stillwater
City Council to appoint members to serve on a commission on the basis of
qualifications, community interest, dependability and a willingness to cooperate.
Political affiliation, personal relationship and shared beliefs shall not be a
prerequisite for appointment, nor shall race, creed, age or gender be a
disqualifying factor. Rather, an individuals desire to serve for the betterment
of city government and the community and the individuals ability to study issues
in an objective and rational manner shall determine whether or not he/she is
qualified for an appointment.
Further, the City Council believes that the community's interest is best served
during the decision making process with commissions that have as its members
individuals who reside in the community and who would better understand the
impact a decision on issues of "local concern" would have on their .fellow
residents. The Council also believes that it is desireable from the standpoint
of differing points of view and a wider range of ideas to have as many citizens
as possible involved in the decision making process. Therefore, it shall also
be the policy of the Stillwater City Council to only appoint residents of the
City to serve on its commissions and to serve on only one commission at a time
unless otherwise required by law or unless the interest of city government would
otherwise be better served by nonresidency and/or simultaneous appointments.
Charter Commission
Purpose:
How Created:
Membership:
How appointed:
Terms of Office:
Qualifications:
Water Board
Purpos e :
How Created:
Membership:
How appointed:
Terms of Office:
Qualifications:
Library Board
Purpose:
How Created:
Membership:
How appointed:
Terms of Office:
Qualifications:
\,
EXHIBIT "A"
SUMMARY OF PRESENT
BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
e
To continue to study the local charter and city government and
prepare changes when appropriate.
Minnesota statutes, Chapter 410
Nine (cQuld be anywhere from seven to fifteen members).
District Court
Four years (no more than two consecutive terms).
"Qualified" voter of the city (can hold other public office
or employment including city Council).
I
To mana~e and operate the City's water system.
City Ch~ter (Article XIII).
e
Three m~mbers (city treasurer is ex-officio member).
APPointt'd by Mayor (without approval of City Council).
Three y ars.
Must bel "voters" of the city.
I
I
!
To ope~ate and maintain Stillwater Public Library.
I
Minnesta Statutes, Chapter 134
Nine m ers (could be five, seven or nine members).
By May~r with Council approval.
Three ~ears (no more than three - three year terms).
IIResidJntll of the City (only one Councilmember can serve at
one tirrle).
e
e
e
e
.
Planning Commission
Purpose: To act as City's planning agency.
How Created: City Code Chapter 22.05.
Membership: Nine members.
How appointed: City Council
Terms of Office: Three years.
Qualifications: None (i.e., residency requirements not specified)
Parks and Recreation Commission
Purpose:
To operate a program of recreation and to manage City parks
and playgrounds.
How Created:
City Code Chapter 48.
Membership:
Eleven members (one councilmember).
How appointed:
City Council
Terms of Office: Two years
Qualifications: "Citizen" of the City.
Port Authority
Purpose: To have general charge of all wharves, docks and landings and
to have general supervision of that portion of the st. Croix
River which the City has jurisdiction and control.
How Created: City Code Chapter 49.
Membership: Six (Mayor is ex-officio member).
How appointed: By Mayor with Council confirmation.
Terms of Office: Three years.
Qualifications: Voter of the City.
Joint Cable Communications Commission
e
Purpose: To administer cable communication franchise ordinance.
How Created: Joint Pdwers Agreement.
Membership: Two priplary members and one alternate member from each
municipqlity (Bayport, Oak Park Heights and Stillwater).
How appointed: City Co~cil
Terms of Office: Two years.
Qualifications: Registered voter.
I
Brown's Creek Water Managtment Organization
Purpose:
How Created:
Membership:
How Appointed:
Terms of Office:
Qualifications:
Middle River Water
Purpose:
How Created:
Membership:
How Appointed:
To deve~op a surface water management plan and program to
preserv~ and use natural water storage and retention systems.
Joint Piwers Agreement.
Six m~ers (one member and alternate from each participating
jurisdiction of Grant Township, Hugo, May Township, Oak Park
Heights, Stillwater and Stillwater Township).
e
City COlj1ncil.
Three ytars.
None sp,cif ied.
I
I
I
i
Managerent Organization
To deve'lop a surface water management plan and program to
preserve and use natural water storage and retention systems
in the ~iddle River Watershed District.
I
Joint Ppwers Agreement.
Eleven I members (one member and alternate from each
partici~ating jurisdiction of Afton, Bayport, Bay town Township,
Lakelan~, Lakeland Shores, Oak Park Heights, St. Croix Beach,
st. Mary's Point, Stillwater and Stillwater Township and West
Lakelanp Township).
City cohncil.
Terms of Office: Three Yrars.
e
Qualifications:
None sp~cif ied.
i
e
Heritage Preservation Commission
Purpose: To safeguard the heritage of the City by working toward the
preservation of historical sites and structures.
How Created: City Code Chapter 22.10.
Membership: Seven members (Planning Commission Chairperson and City Planner
are ex-officio members).
How Appointed: By Mayor with City Council confirmation.
Terms of Office: Three years.
Qualifications: Residency not specified.
Downtown Plan Action Committee
Purpose:
To facilitate the improvement of the Downtown through the
implementation of the Downtown Plan.
How Created:
Resolution (No. 7997).
e
Membership:
Nine members (one from each: Planning commission, Heritage
Preservation Commission, two Councilmembers and five citizens).
How Appointed: City Council.
Terms of Office: Two years.
Qualif ications: None except resolution states that the citizens (five) members
shall represent downtown property or business owners, financial
institutions, past members of the Downtown Plan Steering
Committee and other residents interested in improving the
downtown.
Solid Waste Advisory Committee
Purpose:
To study all areas associated with the collection and disposal
of community waste and to develope a plan of action to achieve
the goals set forth by the City Council.
How Created: Council motion.
Membership: None specified.
How Appointed: City Council.
e Terms of Office: Indefinite.
Qualifications: None specified.
e
1 /YD 11 9>)
D.A. HANSEN
)'-t..2.....7 Be,= 'reI rj o=>d>" \'"JV\fl Hl t ~
19yt;t BLUJ~ - JOY ).'y-st )",-1\ r",y-YV\
m~ Y I A.. '^. (::Y\ ~ ~ ~ ....",j- s .. '" - t6 y- .;;2A t",- """'-.
)..6 '-5> IN "'\ sh"Y0- _)fS"'- ;, ~\ t.."y-<Y\
-
/Lb~ ~
--- ---
---
,
e
,.e
e
e
,\
.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
(UNIT PRICE CONTRACT)
NO.4
OWNER: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
OWNER'S PROJECT NO.
LOCATION: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 89255.01
CONTRACTOR: JOHNSON BROS. CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 1002
LITCHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55355
CONTRACT DATE:
June 10, 1991
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$4,666,178.85
CONTR FOR: STILLWATER DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT
APPLlC. DATE October 10, 1991
PERIOD END October 4, 1991
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
JBC CllY QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
ITEM ITEM CONTRACT UNIT LAST LAST THIS THIS QUANTITY TOTAL
NO. NO, DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT PAYMENT TO-DATE TO-DATE
1 2021.501 Mobilization (5% Max) LS 1.0 150,000.00 1 150,000.00 0 0.00 1 150,000.00
2 2031.503 Field Office, Type 0 EA 1.0 7,000.00 1 7,000.00 0 0.00 1 7,000.00
3 2101.501 Clearing ACRE 0.5 900.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
4 2101.506 Grubbing ACRE 0.5 900.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
5 2104.501 Remove Conc. Curb & Gutter LF 14,935.0 1.00 7757 7,757.00 2518 2,518.00 10275 10,275.00
6 2104.501 Remove Existing Sewer Pipe LF 1,359.0 2.00 499 998.00 0 0.00 499 998.00
7 2104.505 Remove Cone. Driveway SY 1,299.2 4.00 308 1,232.00 322 1,288.00 630 2,520.00
8 2104.505 Remove Pavement (Cone. or Bit.) SY 22,312.0 4.00 16077 64,308.00 7955 31,820.00 24032 96,128.00
9 2104.505 Remove Concrete Sidewalk SY 12,193.0 4.00 5728 22,912.00 1321 5,284.00 7049 28,196.00
10 2104.507 Remove Misc. Concrete Structures CY 8.2 50.00 0 0.00 13.3 665.00 13.3 665.00
11 2104.507 Remove Sidewalk Vault CY 148.1 20.00 20.5 410.00 0.00 20.5 410.00
12 2104.509 Remove Catch Basins & Manholes EA 73.0 200.00 56 11,200.00 16 3,200.00 72 14,400.00
13 2104,509 Remove light Standard Base EA 50.0 200.00 31 6,200.00 9 1,800.00 40 8,000.00
14 2104.509 Remove light Standards EA 81.0 150.00 31 4,650.00 29 4,350.00 60 9,000.00
15 2104.521 Salvage 12' RCP Storm Sewer LF 8.0 60.00 0 0,00 0 0.00 0 0.00
16 2104.523 Salvage Casting EA 1.0 200.00 0 0.00 1 200.00 1 200.00
17 2104.523 Salvage Gate Valve and Box EA 5.0 200.00 1 200,00 0 0.00 1 200,00
18 2104.523 Salvage Hydrants EA 9.0 400.00 6 2,400.00 3 1,200.00 9 3,600.00
19 2104.523 Salvage 8'XS' Tapping Sleeve EA 1.0 1,000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
20 2104.525 Abandon Water Service EA 30.0 150.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
21 0104.601 Vibration Monitoring LS 1.0 20,000.00 0.45 9,000.00 0.15 3,000.00 0.6 12,000.00
22 0104.604 Salvage Paver Stones SY 4,659.0 4.00 2820 11,280.00 1859 7,436.00 4679 18,716.00
23 0104.606 Abandon Ex. Sewer Pipe (12'&Small.) SL 425.0 3.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
24 0104.606 Abandon Ex. Sewer Pipe (Greater 12') SL 634.0 6.00 0 0.00 131 786.00 131 786.00
25 2105.501 Common Excavation (P) CY 24,204.0 6.00 15902 95,412.00 4560 27,360.00 20462 122,772.00
26 2105.503 Rock Excavation (EV) CY 500.0 50.00 125 6,250.00 12.3 615.00 137.3 6,865.00
27 2105.507 Subgrade Excavation (CV) CY 4,578.0 6.00 294 1,764.00 0 0.00 294 1,764.00
28 2105.507 Contam.Soil Exc. & Disposal(EV) CY 1440 13.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
29 2105.515 Unclass. Excavation (EV) CY 5,385.0 8.00 962 7,696.00 1981 15,848.00 2943 23,544.00
30 2105.521 Granular Borrow (CV) CY 6,912.0 10.00 53.5 535.00 2889.5 28,895.00 2943 29,430.00
31 2105.522 Select Granular Borrow (C.V.) CY 22,098.0 10.00 8482 84,820.00 2133 21,330.00 10615 106,150.00
32 2105.525 Topsoil Borrow (LV.) CY 262.0 14.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
33 2112.501 Subgrade Preparation RD STA 90.3 400.00 28 11,200.00 36.6 14,640.00 64.6 25,840.00
34 2123.501 Common Laoorers -rm------ -----roo:o--... -'32.00 8.-------256~OO.. .-------{)- - .~;OO 8 256.00
35 2123.501 Backhoe (1 CY) HR 100.0 90.00 4 360.00 0 0.00 4 360.00
36 2123.501 Dozer HR 100.0 75.00 1 75.00 0 0.00 1 75.00
37 2123.501 Truck (12 CY) HR 100.0 50.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
38 2123.501 Front End Loader (3 CY) HR 100.0 75.00 4 300.00 0 0.00 4 300.00
39 0123.601 Street Sweeping HR 100.0 65.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
40 2130.501 Water for Oust Control MGL 650.0 10.00 1016.8 10,168.00 106.8 1,068.00 1123.6 11,236.00
41 2131.501 Calcium Chloride Type 1 TON 25.0 300.00 1 300.00 0 0.00 1 300.00
42 2211.501 Agg. Base CI. 5 (100% Crushed) TON 15,409.0 10.00 9080 90,800.00 7043 70,430.00 16123 161,230.00
43 2232.501 Mill Bituminous Surface SY 2,471.0 2.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
44 2301.501 Concrete Pavement SY 1,232.0 20.00 0 0.00 2.2 44.00 2.2 44.00
45 2301.511 Structural Concrete CY 301.0 54.00 0 0.00 0.52 28.08 0.52 28.08
46 0301.604 Concrete Header Joint LF 80.0 25.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
47 2331.508 Type 61 Wearing Course TON 2,888.0 27.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
48 2331.508 Type 41 Mod. Wearing Course TON 2,367.0 25.00 0 0.00 289.4 7,235.00 289.4 7,235.00
49 2331.510 Type 31 Binder Course TON 4,445.0 20.00 112.56 2,251.20 1101.8 22,036.00 1214.36 24,287.20
50 2331.510 Type 31 Leveling Course TON 1,125.0 20.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
51 2331.514 Type 31 Base Course TON 8,007.0 20.00 1344 26,880.00 2926.2 58,524.00 4270.2 85,404.00
52 2331.522 Type 41 Mixture for Patching TON 924.0 36.00 37.18 1,338.48 151.7 5,461.20 188.88 6,799.68
53 2356.505 Bit Material for Seal Coat (CRS-2) GAL 2,367.0 1.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
54 2356.507 Seal Coat Aggregate (FA-2) TON 120.0 25.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
55 2357.502 Bitum. Material for Tack Coat GAL 6,444.0 1.00 50 50.00 700 700.00 750 750.00
56 2402.583 Elevated Walk Ornamental Railing LF 509.0 75.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
57 2402.583 Wall Cap Ornamenlal Railing LF 56.0 85.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
58 0411.601 Rubble Wall Tuck Point & Repair LS 1.0 8,000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
59 0411.601 Modify Exi sting Metal Stairs LS 1.0 1,200.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
.. 60 0411.601 Dumpster Enclosure LS 1.0 12,000.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
617 0411.603 Wall Closure-Areaway SF 830.5 35.00 192 6,720.00 437 15,295.00 629 22,015.00
62 0411.eWall Closure-Storm Sewer Stub SF 90.0 _.00 28 7,000.00 5 1,250.00 33e 8,250.00
e e e
63 0411.603 Wall Closure - Fire Service SF 21.0 250.00 27 6,750.00 13 3,250.00 40 10,000.00
64 0411.603 Cone. Steps SF RIS 272.0 10.00 18.8 188.00 0 0.00 18.8 188.00
65 0411.603 Elevated Walk Relaining Wall SF FACE 4,558.0 25.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
66 0411.603 Elevated Walk Precast Decking SF 1,496.0 10.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
67 0411.603 Elev. Walk Cast Inplace Deck (4') SF 318.0 5.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
68 0411.603 Elev. Walk Cast In place Deck (6') SF 477.0 6.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
69 0411.603 Window Well SF 18.0 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
70 0411.603 Reconstruct Limestone Material SF 1,235.0 20.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
71 0411.603 Reconstruct Limestone Retaining Wall SF 1,235.0 50.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
72 0411.604 Elevated Walk Support Beam LF 205.0 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
73 0411.604 Grade Beam (Shorty's Wall) LF 56.0 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
74 2451.507 Granular Bedding (CV) CY 2,020.0 3.60 2277 8,197.20 -2277 (8,197.20) 0 0.00
75 2451.509 Aggregate Bedding (CV) CY 2,555.0 7.00 2080 14.560.00 2072 14,504.00 4152 29,064.00
76 2502.541 3' Perfor. PE Drain W/Sock LF 6,640.0 3.00 2669 8,007.00 3606 10,818.00 6275 18,825.00
77 2502.5416' Perfor. PE Drain W/Sock LF 970.0 9.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
78 2503.541 12' RCP Storm Leads Des. 3006. CI. V LF 1,511.0 33.00 542 17,886.00 301 9,933.00 843 27.819.00
79 2503.541 12' RCP Storm Sewer. Des. 3006, CI. V LF 1,093.0 33.00 408 13,464.00 334 11,022.00 742 24,486.00
80 2503.541 15' RCP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. V LF 961.0 35.00 251 8,785.00 420 14,700.00 671 23,485.00
81 2503.541 18' RCP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. V LF 710.0 39.00 585 22,815.00 126 4,914.00 711 27,729.00
82 2503.541 21' RCP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 64.0 40.00 64 2,560.00 0 0.00 64 2,560.00
83 2503.541 30' RCP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 55.0 45.00 0 0.00 55 2,475.00 55 2,475.00
84 2503.541 33' RCP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 313.0 50.00 8 400.00 306 15,300.00 314 15.700.00
85 2503.541 36' ACP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 442.0 60.00 402 24,120.00 37 2.220.00 439 26,340.00
86 2503.541 42' ACP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 173.0 90.00 197 17,730.00 33 2,970.00 230 20,700.00
87 2503.541 48' ACP Storm Sewer, Des. 3006, CI. III LF 217.0 100.00 196 19.600.00 0 0.00 196 19,600.00
88 2503.541 15" ACP Storm Sewer LA Bends LF 28.0 70.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
89 2503.54148' ACP Storm Sewer LR Bends LF 72.0 200.00 72 14,400.00 0 0.00 72 14,400.00
90 2503.571 Inslall12' RCP Storm Sewer LF 8.0 35.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
91 2503.573 Inslal! Storm Sewer Casting EA 1.0 200.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
92 0503.602 Furnish Casting Assembly R1733 (San Sew) EA 61.0 116.60 38 4,430.80 14 1,632.40 52 6,063.20
92 0503.602 Inslall Casting Assembly R1733 (San Sew) EA 61.0 183.40 0 0.00 38 6,969.20 38 6,969.20
93 0503.602 Pressure Test & Seal 8' Pipe Joint EA 118.0 25.00 108 2,700.00 0 0.00 108 2,700.00
94 0503.602 Pressure Test & Seal 12" Pipe Joint EA 902.0 30.00 515 15,450.00 3 90.00 518 15,540.00
95 0503.602 Pressure Test & Seal 18' Pipe Joint EA 169.0 40.00 126 5,040.00 0 0.00 126 5,040.00
96 0503.602 Pressure Test & Seal 24' Pipe Joint EA 44.0 50.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
97 0503.602 Seal Sanilary Sewer Service EA 55.0 115.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
98 0503.602 Furnish 8'><6' Wye EA 36.0 14.41 3 43.23 0 0.00 3 43.23
98 0503.602 Inslall 8'><6' Wye EA 36.0 55.59 3 166.77 0 0.00 3 166.77
99 0503.602 Furnish 10'><6' Wye EA 1.0 29.92 7 209.44 0 0.00 7 209.44
99 0503.602 Inslalf 10'><6' Wye EA 1.0 70.08 7 490.56 0 0.00 7 490.56
100 0503.602 Furnish 12"><6" Wye EA 65.0 42.38 20 847.60 6 254.28 26 1,101.88
100 0503.602 'nslalf 12'><6' Wye EA 65.0 87.62 20 1,752.40 6 525.72 26 2,278.12
101 0503.602 Furnish 15'xS' Wye EA 8.0 66.84 3 200.52 0 0.00 3 200.52
101 0503.602 Inslall15'x6' Wye EA 8.0 83.16 3 249.48 0 0.00 3 249.48
102 0503.602 Furnish 18'><6' Wye EA 8.0 70.83 1 70.83 0 0.00 1 70.83
102 0503.602 Inslall18'x6' Wye EA 8.0 129.17 1 129.17 0 0.00 1 129.17
103 0503.602 Furnish 24'><6' Wye EA 59.0 119.53 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
103 0503.602 Inslall24'x6' Wye EA 59.0 180.47 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
104 0503.602 Furnish 30'><6' Wye EA 5.0 119.53 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
104 0503.602 Inslall 30'><6' Wye EA 5.0 280.47 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
105 0503.602 Core RCP For Service EA 3.0 150.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
106 0503.602 Reconnect to Existing San Service EA 184.0 30.00 38 1,140.00 14 420.00 52 1,560.00
107 0503.602 Type ( ) Stub Wall Closure EA 35.0 225.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
108 0503.602 48'x42' RCP Red.,CI.III,Des.3006 EA 1.0 600.00 1 600.00 0 0.00 1 600.00
109 0503.60242'x36' RCP Red.,CI.III,Des.3006 EA 1.0 500.00 1 500.00 0 0.00 1 500.00
110 0503.60348' RCP Storm Sew.CI. 4000D(Jacked) LF 56.0 500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
111 0503.603 Storm Sewer Stub 6' DIP LF 526.0 30.00 365 10,950.00 31 930.00 396 11,880.00
---- - -- -- --------------
112 0503.603 Storm Sewer-Stub 8' DIP . -----CF - 12'8.0 3'5:0-0-n 464--- . 16,240.00 . ------rog- 3;ct15:00 513 -----20,055.00
113 0503.60318' Steel Cas. Pipe Augered{San.) LF 50.0 85.00 50 4,250.00 0 0.00 50 4,250.00
114 0503.603 Furnish 4' PVC Sanitary Service Pipe LF 110.0 0.52 110 57.20 72.5 37.70 182.5 94.90
114 0503.603 Inslall4' PVC Sanilary Service Pipe LF 110.0 17.48 91.5 1,599.42 91 1,590.68 182.5 3,190.10
115 0503.603 Furnish 6' PVC Sanitary Service Pipe LF 1,952.0 1.09 1952 2,127.68 0 0.00 1952 2,127.68
115 0503.603 Inslall 6' PVC Sanilary Service Pipe LF 1,952.0 18.91 233 4,406.03 47 888.77 280 5,294.80
116 0503.603 Furnish 8' PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 303.0 1.90 303 575.70 0 0.00 303 575.70
116 0503.603 Inslall 8' PVC Sanilary Sewer LF 303.0 28.10 44.5 1,250.45 11 309.10 55.5 1,559.55
117 0503.603 Furnish 10' PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 15.0 3.05 15 45.75 0 0.00 15 45.75
117 0503.603 Inslalll0' PVC Sanilary Sewer LF 15.0 31.95 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
118 0503.603 Furnish 12' PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 217.0 4.40 0 0.00 126 554.40 126 554.40
118 0503.603 Inslall12' PVC Sanilary Sewer LF 217.0 35.60 0 0.00 126 4,485.60 126 4,485.60
119 0503.603 Furnish 18' PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 181.0 10.18 181 1,842.58 0 0.00 181 1,842.58
119 0503.603 Inslall18' PVC Sanilary Sewer LF 181.0 34.82 151 5,257.82 0 0.00 151 5,257.82
120 0503.603 Furnish 24' PVC Sanitary Sewer LF 58.0 17.86 58 1,035.88 0 0.00 58 1,035.88
120 0503.603 Inslall24' PVC Sanilary Sewer LF 58.0 37.14 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
121 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 8' VCP LF 135.0 90.00 84 7,560.00 0 0.00 84 7,560.00
122 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 12' VCP LF 1,178.0 60.00 1101 66,060.00 18 1,080.00 1119 67,140.00
123 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 15' VCP LF 795.0 65.00 650 42,250.00 0 0.00 650 42,250.00
124 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 18' VCP LF 386.0 70.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
125 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 24' VCP/Brick LF 1,138.0 135.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
126 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 30' Brick LF 210.0 80.00 17 1,360.00 0 0.00 17 1,360.00
127 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 36' Brick LF 92.0 90.00 92 8,280.00 0 0.00 92 8,280.00
128 0503.603 Rehabililate San. Sewer 24 'x36' VCP LF 354.0 90.00 0 0.00 299 26,910.00 299 26,910.00
129 0503.603 Rehabilitate San. Sewer Manhole LF 527.5 200.00 192.7 38,540.00 126 25,200.00 318.7 63,740.00
130 0503.603 Televise Existing Sanilary Sewer LF 4,804.0 0.60 4098 2,458.80 776 465.60 4874 2,924.40
131 0503.603 Clean Existing Sanilary Sewer LF 4,804.0 1.50 4098 6,147.00 776 1,164.00 4874 7,311.00
132 . 0504.601 Temporary Water Service LS 1.0 7,500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
133 0504.-'djust Existing Gate Valve Box EA 58.0 _00 0 0.00 0 0.00 De 0.00
e e e
134 0504.602 Adjust Existing Curb Box EA 38.0 110.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
, 135 0504.602 Adjust Existing Hydrant EA 10.0 500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
136 0504.602 Bulkheads Watermain (All Sizes) EA 26.0 150.00 1 150.00 4 600.00 5 750.00
137 0504.602 Conn. to Exist C. a or M. H. EA 40.0 125.00 8 1,000.00 6 750.00 14 1,750.00
138 0504.602 Connect to Existing Watermain EA 17.0 150.00 4 600.00 4 600.00 8 1,200.00
139 0504.6026')(6' Wet Tap EA 2.0 1,000.00 2 2,000.00 0 0.00 2 2,000.00
140 0504.6028')(6' Wet Tap EA 3.0 1,100.00 0 0.00 5 5,500.00 5 5,500.00
141 0504.602 Furnish 6' Gate Valve and Box EA 54.0 255.94 54 13,820.76 12 3,071.28 66 16,892.04
141 0504.602 Inslall 6' Gate Valve and Box EA 54.0 144.06 45 6,482.70 21 3,025.26 66 9,507.96
142 0504.602 Furnish 8' Gate Valve and Box EA 8.0 357.24 10 3,572.40 3 1,071.72 13 4.644.12
142 0504.602 Inslall 8' Gate Valve and Box EA 8.0 192.76 10 1,927.60 3 578.28 13 2,505.88
143 0504.602 Furnish 10' Gate Valve and Box EA 6.0 513.05 6 3,078.30 0 0.00 6 3,078.30
143 0504.602 Inslalll0' Gate Valve and Box EA 6.0 286.95 5 1,434.75 0 0.00 5 1,434.75
144 0504.602 Furnish 12' Butterfly Valve and Box EA 6.0 594.94 6 3,569.64 0 0.00 6 3,569.64
144 0504.602 Inslall 12' Butterfly Valve and Box EA 6.0 355.06 4 1,420.24 1 355.06 5 1,775.30
145 0504.602 Furnish Hychnt EA 19.0 895.70 23 20,601.10 1 895.70 24 21,496.80
145 0504.602 Inslall Hydrant EA 19.0 304.30 18 5,477.40 5 1,521.50 23 6,998.90
146 0504.602 Inslall Hydrant EA 1.0 500.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
147 0504.6023/4' Corporation Stop EA 39.0 40.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
148 0504.6021' Corporation Stop EA 7.0 40.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
149 0504.6022' Corporation Stop EA 2.0 40.00 29 1,160.00 13 520.00 42 1,680.00
150 0504.6023/4 Curb Stop and Box EA 20.0 120.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
151 0504.602 l' Curb Stop and Box EA 4.0 130.00 2 260.00 1 130.00 3 390.00
152 0504.6022' Curb Stop and Box EA 1.0 220.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
153 0504.602 Connect to Existing Fire Stub EA 10.0 140.00 1 140.00 5 700.00 6 840.00
154 0504.602 Reconnect Existing Water Service EA 33.0 35.00 0 0.00 6 210.00 6 210.00
155 0504.602 Relocate Existing Curb Box and Stop EA 5.0 250.00 0 0.00 1 250.00 1 250.00
156 0504.603 Fire Sprinkler Stup 6' DIP LF 333.0 20.00 1433 28,660.00 553.5 11,070.00 1986.5 39,730.00
157 0504.603 Fire Sprinkler Stub 8' DIP LF 45.0 25.00 195.5 4,887.50 0 0.00 195.5 4,887.50
158 0504.60318' Steel Casing Pipe Augered (Wat) LF 103.0 85.00 103 8,755.00 0 0.00 103 8,755.00
159 0504.603 Furnish 6' DIP Watermain LF 1,145.0 5.81 756 4,392.36 31 180.11 787 4,572.47
159 0504.603 'nslall 6' DIP Watermain LF 1,145.0 9.19 256 2,352.64 531 4,879.89 787 7,232.53
160 0504.603 Furnish 8' DIP Water main LF 2,033.0 7.94 2072 16,451.68 17.5 138.95 2089.5 16,590.63
160 0504.603 Inslall 8' DIP Watermain LF 2,033.0 10.06 2072 20,844.32 17.5 176.05 2089.5 21,020.37
161 0504.603 Furnish 10' DIP Watermain LF 1,560.0 10.45 1680 17,556.00 0 0.00 1680 17,556.00
161 0504.603 Inslalll0' DIP Watermain LF 1,560.0 12.55 1288 16,164.40 0 0.00 1288 16,164.40
162 0504.603 Furnish 12' DIP Watermain LF 2,763.0 13.21 1729.5 22,846.70 607 8,018.47 2336.5 30,865.17
162 0504.603 Inslall12' DIP Watermain LF 2,763.0 13.79 1729.5 23,849.81 607 8,370.53 2336.5 32,220.34
163 0504.6036' DIP Hydrant Lead LF 195.0 24.00 310 7,440.00 20 480.00 330 7,920.00
164 0504.6033/4' Copper Service LF 793.0 12.00 0 0.00 16 192.00 16 192.00
165 0504.603 l' Copper Service LF 163.0 13.00 0 0.00 92 1,196.00 92 1,196.00
166 0504.6032' Copper Service LF 49.0 15.00 0 0.00 26 390.00 26 390.00
167 0504.6054' Insulation SY 36.0 40.00 114 4,560.00 18.1 724.00 132.1 5,284.00
168 0504.620 Furnish Watermain Fittings LF 12,283.0 1.25 12948 16,185.00 5508 6,885.00 18456 23,070.00
168 0504.620 Inslall Watermain Fittings LF 12,283.0 0.75 12948 9,711.00 5508 4,131.00 18456 13,842.00
169 2506.506 Construct Manhole Design 48-4020 LF 167.7 180.00 45.8 8,244.00 50.6 9,108.00 96.4 17,352.00
170 2506.506 Construct Manhole Design 60 -4020 LF 6.7 140.00 0 0.00 6.71 939.40 6.71 939.40
171 2506.506 Construct Manhole Design 72 -4020 LF 54.1 185.00 38.8 7,178.00 31.3 5,790.50 70.1 12,968.50
172 2506.506 Construct Manhole Design 84 -4020 LF 14.5 275.00 14.46 3,976.50 0 0.00 14.46 3,976.50
173 2506.507 Construct Catch Basin, Design X LF 156.3 125.00 47.5 5,937.50 53.2 6,650.00 100.7 12,587.50
174 2506.507 Construct Catch Basin, Design Y LF 322.4 135.00 106.6 14,391.00 100.3 13,540.50 206.9 27,931.50
175 2506.507 Construct Catch Basin, Design H LF 3.5 90.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
176 2506.516 Furnish Cast Assembly R1733 EA 29.0 118.57 29 3,438.53 0 0.00 29 3,438.53
176 2506.516 Inslall Cast Assembly R1733 EA 29.0 121.43 0 0.00 20 2,428.60 20 2,428.60
177 2506.516 Furnish Cast Assembly R3250-A EA 1.0 182.32 1 182.32 0 0.00 1 182.32
177 2506.516 Inslall Cast Assembly R3250 - A EA 1.0 117.68 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
178 2506.516 Furnish Cast Assembly R3067 EA 112.0 182.32 9 1,640.88 103 18,778.96 112 20,419.84
u_ -178 m2506:5l6lnsfalrCastAssembly mU6T--- .-------ep;-- Tf2:U"- 117.68'--- 9 1,059.12 --01 6,001.08 60 7,060.80
179 2506.516 Furnish Cast Assembly R-6660-JH (AccessEA 4.0 320.12 0 0.00 4 1,280.48 4 1,280.48
179 2506.516 'nslall Cast Assembly A-6660 -JH (Access) EA 4.0 (20.12) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
180 2506.516 Furnish Areaway Access Casting Assem. EA 3.0 1,652.88 1 1,652.88 0 0.00 1 1,652.88
180 2506.516 Inslall Neaway Access Casting Assem. EA 3.0 547.12 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
181 2506.522 Adjust Frame & Ri ng Casting EA 122.0 85.00 0 0.00 29 2,465.00 29 2,465.00
182 2506.522 Adjust Gas Main Valve Box EA 39.0 85.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
183 0506.601 Spec. Struct. No. 502-Flap Gate MH LS 1.0 15,000.00 0.5 7,500.00 0 0.00 0.5 7,500.00
184 0506.601 Spec. struct No. 500-Levee Wall LS 1.0 25,000.00 1 25,000.00 0 0.00 1 25,000.00
185 2511.505 Handplaced Riprap Class4 CY 25.0 50.00 33 1,650.00 0 0.00 33 1,650.00
186 2521.501 4' Concrete Walk SF 137,288.0 2.00 22300 44,600.00 3181 6,362.00 25481 50,962.00
187 2521.501 6' Concrete Walk SF 336.0 3.00 0 0.00 650 1,950.00 650 1,950.00
188 0521.601 Concrete Cross Gutter LF 319.0 10.00 155 1,550.00 108 1,080.00 263 2,630.00
189 0521.602 Structural Neaway Roof SF 186.0 58.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
190 2531.501 Concrete Curb&Gutter, Des. 8624 LF 697.0 10.00 235 2,350.00 68 680.00 303 3,030.00
191 2531.501 Concrete Curb&Gutter, Des. 8618 LF 17,210.0 5.30 4732 25,079.60 2414 12,794.20 7146 37,873.80
192 2531.501 Cone. Curb, Des. V6(Planter Curb) LF 836.0 12.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
193 2531.507 8' Concrete Driveway Pavement SY 2,641.2 25.00 530 13,250.00 0 0.00 530 13,250.00
194 2545.511 Lighting Uni~ Type A(35') EA 86.0 1,155.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
195 2545.511 Lighting Uni~ Type Al (32') EA 3.0 1,155.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
196 2545.511 Light Unit, Type A2 (30' Park Lots) EA 1.0 1,155.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
197 2545.511 Light Unit, Type A3 (Signal Ext) EA 6.0 860.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
198 2545.511 Lighting Uni~ Type A4 EA 0.0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
199 2545.511 Lighting Uni~ Type D EA 8.0 520.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
200 2545.515 Lighting Base, Design A EA 87.0 480.00 37 17,760.00 0 0.00 37 17,760.00
201 2545.521 F- 1 1/2' RSC LF 2,461.0 1.18 2461 2,903.98 0 0.00 2461 2,903.98
'201 2545.521 1 1/2' Aigid Steel Conduit LF 2,461.0 4.22 340 1,434.80 335 1,413.70 675 2,848.50
202 -2545.521 F - 2" RSC LF 230.0 1.54 230 354.20 0 0.00 230 354.20
202 2545.5_ Rigid Steel Conduit LF 230.0 .66 0 0.00 110 512.60 110 e 512.60
e e e
203 2545.523 F- 1 112' PVC LF 18,709.0 0.25 18709 4,677.25 0 0.00 18709 4,677.25
'203 2545.5231 112' PVC Conduit LF 18,709.0 2.35 5645 13,265.75 3590 8,436.50 9235 21,702.25
204 2545.531 Underground Wire, 1 Condo No.4 Ser LF 200.0 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
205 2545.531 Underground Wire, 1 Condo #1/0 Ser. LF 400.0 1.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
206 2545.531 F - Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No.4 LF 61,952.0 0.22 61952 13,629.44 0 0.00 61952 13,629.44
206 2545.531 I-Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No.4 LF 61,952.0 0.28 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
207 2545.531 F - Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No.8 LF 60,962.0 0.10 60962 6,096.20 0 0.00 60962 6,096.20
2545.531 I-Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No.8 LF 60,962.0 0.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
208 2545.531 F-Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No. 12 LF 15,875.0 0.04 12000 480.00 0 0.00 12000 480.00
208 2545.531 I-Underground Wire, 1 Conductor No. 12 LF 15,875.0 0.26 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
209 2545.541 Service Panel EA 6.0 6,300.00 0 0.00 3 18,900.00 3 18,900.00
210 0563.601 Traffic Control LS 1.0 50,000.00 0.4 20,000.00 0.26 13,000.00 0.66 33,000.00
211 2564.531 F&I Sign Panel, Type C SF 563.0 17.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
212 0564.602 Pavement Message (Handicap) Epoxy EA 9.0 155.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
213 0564.602 Pavement Message (L T Arrow) Epoxy EA 5.0 120.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
214 0564.602 Pavement Message (RT Arrow) Epoxy EA 3.0 120.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
215 0564.602 Pavement Message (Thur/RT Arrow) Epoxy EA 2.0 130.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
216 0564.602 Pavement Message (Only) Epoxy EA 7.0 155.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
217 0564.602 Pavement Mess. (Zebra Crosswalk)-Epoxy EA 1.0 1,180.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
218 0564.602 Salv.&Reinstall Sign Panel, Type C EA 153.0 12.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
219 0564.602 F&I Sign Posts EA 238.0 64.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
220 0564.602 F&I Street Name Signs EA 31.0 180.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
221 0564.602 Furnish Sign Posts EA 10.0 60.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
222 0564.6034' Double Solid Line-Yellow Epoxy LF 5,650.0 0.70 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
223 0564.6034' Wide Solid Une-White Epoxy LF 9,025.0 1.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
224 0564.6034' Wide Broken Une-Yellow Epoxy LF 490.0 1.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
226 0564.6038' Wide Transverse - Yellow Epoxy LF 180.0 3.15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
225 0564.6036' Solid LIne (Crosswalks) - Epoxy LF 3,575.0 2.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
227 0564.60324' Solid Stop Une-White Epoxy LF 615.0 4.75 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
228 0565.604 Revise Signal System 'A' SYSTEM 1.0 21,735.00 0.646481 14,051.25 0.1535195 3,336.75 0.8 17,388.00
228 0565.604 Material on Hand System 'A' SYSTEM 1.0 3,365.00 1 3,365.00 0 0.00 1 3,365.00
229 0565.604 Revise Signal System 'B' SYSTEM 1.0 24,635.00 0 0.00 0.75 18,476.25 0..75 18,476.25
0565.604 Material on Hand System 'B' SYSTEM 1.0 3365 1 3,365.00 0 0.00 1 3,365.00
230 0565.604 Revise Signal System 'C' SYSTEM 1.0 23,535.00 0 0.00 0.15 3,530.25 0.15 3,530.25
0565.604 Material on Hand System 'C' SYSTEM 1.0 3365 1 3,365.00 0 0.00 1 3,365.00
231 2571.506 Japanese Creeper VINE 240.0 10.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
232 2571.506 Virginia Creeper VINE 250.0 10.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
233 2571.506 Common Trumpet Creeper VINE 240.0 10.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
234 2575.501 Roadside Seeding ACRE 2.0 275.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
235 2575.502 Seed Mixture 500 LB. 100.0 2.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
236 2575.505 Sodding SY 1,815.0 2.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
237 2575.511 Mulch Material, Type 1 TON 4.0 120.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
238 2575.519 Disk Anchoring ACRE 2.0 75.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
239 2580.501 Temporary Lane Marking RD ST A 89.0 4.00 10 40.00 0 0.00 10 40.00
240 2104.505 Deduct for Relining Pvmt Rem. SY (1,000.0) 3.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
243 2301.501 Deduct for Relining Cone. Pvmt SY (1,000.0) 18.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
244 2301.511 Deduct for Relining StructConc. CY (244.0) 45.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
249 2451.509 Deduct for Relining Agg. Bedding CY (400.0) 7.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
250 2451.507 Deduct for Relining Gran. Bedding CY (400.0) 3.60 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
241 2105.521 Deduct for Relining Gran. Borrow CY (1,500.0) 6.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
242 2211.501 Deduct for Relining Agg. Base, CI. 5 TON (680.0) 9.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
245 2331.510 Deduct for Relining Type 31 Bi nder TON (105.0) 19.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
246 2331.514 Deduct for Relining Type 31 Base TON (105.0) 19.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
247 2331.508 Deduct for Relining Type 41 Wear TON (105.0) 24.30 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
248 2357.502 Deduct for Relining Bit Matl./Tack GAL (100.0) 1.28 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
251 0503.603 Deduct for Relining 6' PVC Servo Pipe LF (600.0) 16.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
252 0503.602 Deduct for Relining Conn. to Ex. Servo EA (20.0) 30.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
---2-53 -0S6a.601 ()eOO{:tfGF-~1'a#iG-CoJ'l.tl'Ol-- .---.LS---------..(1.O}....-- QJ1Q____m 0 0.00 Q _.J>-,OQ. 0 0.00
0.00
TOTAL BASE BID 1,634,319.48 739,603.70 2,373,923.18
e
e
e
e e e
..
ALTERNATE NO.1 REVISE UGHTING
254 2545.511 Deduct Light Unit Type A(Cobrahead) EA (86.0) 1,155.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
255 2545.511 Deduct Light Unit Type Al (Cobrahead) EA (3.0) 1,155.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
256 2545.511 Deduct Light Unit Type A2(Cobrahead) EA (1.0) 1,155.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
257 2545.511 Deduct Light Unit Type A3(Cobrahead) EA (6.0) 860.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
258 2545.511 Deduct Light Unit Type A4(Cobrahead) EA 0.0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
259 2545.511 F- LIGHTING UNITS TYPE A EA 112.0 36.00 112 4,032.00 0.00 112 4,032.00
259 2545.511 Lighting Unit Type A (Shoebox) EA 112.0 1,314.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
260 2545.511 Lighting Unit Type Al (Shoebox) EA 3.0 1,350.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
261 2545.511 Lighting Unit Type .A2(Shoebox) EA 11.0 1,350.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
262 2545.511 Lighting Unit Type K3 (Shoebox) EA 6.0 1,090.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
263 2545.511 Lighting Unit Type M (Shoebox) EA 3.0 2,050.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
264 2545.515 lighting Base Design A (Shoebox) EA 123.0 480.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
265 2545.515 Deduct Light Base Design A (Cobrahd) EA (87.0) 480.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
266 0564.602 Deduct Furnish & Install Sign Post EA (25.0) 64.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
TOTAL ADD ALTERNATE NO.1: 4,032.00 0.00 4,032.00
TOTAL BASE BID 1,634,319.48 739,603.70 2,373,923.18
TOTAL 0 F ADD AL TEA NATE NO. 1 AND BASE BID $1 ,638,351.48 $ 739,603.70 $ 2,377 ,955.18
APPUCATlON FOR PAYMENT - CONTINUED
TOTAL CONTRACT M10UNT $4,666,178.85 TOTAl AMOUNT EARNED
MATERIAL SUITABLY STORED ON SITE, NOT INCORPORATED INTO WORK
2564.531 F&I Sign Panels - Type C
564.602 Pvmt Message(Handicap) - Epoxy
564.602 Salvage&Reinslall Sign Panel Type C
564.602 F&I Sign Posts
564.6034' Wide Solid Une - White Epoxy
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.1
521.602 Paver Walk
2521.501 Deduct4' Cone Walk
520.611 Lean Mix Cone Paver Base
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.
SF 84
EA -3
EA 5
EA 26
LF 30
PERCENT COWPLETE
SF 18250
SF -18250
SF 18250
PERCENT COMPLETE
PERCENT COMPLETE
GROSS AMOUNT DUE
LESS 5% RETAINAGE
AMOUNT DUETO DATE
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS
AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION
$1,638,351.48
$ 739,603.70
$ 2,377,955.18
17.00
155.00
12.00
64.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.50
0.70
2.50
3422
15,399.00
0.00
8,555.00
3,422
o
3,422
15,399.00
0.00
8,555.00
3422
$1,662,305.48
$----a3;TIS.27
$1,579,190.21
$ 896,540.82
$ 682,649.39
$ 2,401,909.18
$ 120,095.46
$ 2,281,813.72
$ 1,579,190.21 V
$ 702,623.51
739,603.70
. 3E),-g-SO-:1'8
702.623.52
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perju'y that (1) all previous progress paymerts received from the Owner on account of wa-k perfa-med under the
contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge In full all obligations of the undersigned Inclfred In connection with work covered by prla-
Applications for Payment under said contract, and (2) all material and equipment inca-porated in said Project a- otherwise listed In or cmered by this Application for Paymert are
free and clear of all liens, claims, seclflty Interests and encumcrances.
DATED:
fTJ.- t-f - 4' (
JOHNSON BROS. CORPORATION
~.(CONTRACTOR) . _
BY: ~VUrlW
(NAME AND TITLE)
SS
:4-~/ (Jl~~~
COUNTY OF
STATE OF
Before me on thisaLcr:day of Dc. +0 beY'" -----J 1991, personally appeared -5 +e VerI Vo / by-cclt -r , known to me, who being duly sworn, did
depose and say that he is the ~jec t" ineer.. of the Contractor above mentioned; that he executed the above Application and Affidavit on behalf of said
Contractor, and all of the s . Ire correct and complete.
My Commission Expires: . ....' SHELLEY LYNN SUNDBERG~ jjZid..~ ~ ..dtA ~
'~ I~";";:\l'" . ~~;~N~~;~~Nc; ~ (No Pu IC
The undersigned has checKed th~'. ontbt{gAiAtolD~1ilfl a:.T.*y~ent shown above. A part of this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to
him under this Contract hav~I1i~~ ~I all of his obligations In connection with the wa-k cmered by all pria- Applications fa- Paymert.
,In accordance with the Contract. the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the Amount Due.
Date. S~U,IOTT ~/~o~~
. By~",Jt'4~/ ~"Z('
e
"" t
Minnesota ~fu.l Gamblin9,
Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2
Gdffibiiag:~Bdak:::AgdbafttIfrif6!HWldl~::jj:::I:~[[:~[~~[[[~[1j[::t[[:[[l::::l:~[[lj:::::[~[[::[::l~~[*[[[l:[~::::~[[[:::l[:[:::t!::::::~j:::[[[[l:::[:::::[l[:j::::jj:*:::::::;[~:l::[::::[::l::::::!
[:::~~:j:~::lll:~[[[[l::l::[::[I::[j!~[~[lll::[[::::::ij:[~[::[!~[j[I[i
Bank Name ... .. . .. . . Bank Account Number
WI' It b.e. ~/,/\;-rt-d Q:; ~1 ~S (]C(CX).vd-,'s onolll.{Jrf
Bank Address Ity State ~ode
e
.
~a+ri (('0--- .
17qtj E~/of' (;xx)d)!5tt {Je. (, mAl' .e~e('(.J-;cJe,~{'r'~d-o(
c9.q 4.t::; /..a.h. [( Wll? ,f4ue..J J..u.Ju. j;( mo M AJ bu<:; {k1J! S~ tII11f/1f<.(j
~(1 r-.err fH,vd€I2DP1 td z rOlLVl<Lj r<d. E ~I flu dSOV1) (,t) /s. ty'f5./'rlPff
.Gambll.D.g Site Authorization .1 am the chief executive officer of the organization;
1 hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, the .1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful opera-
board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of tion of all activities to be conducted;
. revenue or public safety, or agents of the commissioners, .1 will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota
may enter the premises to enforce the law. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and
Bank Records Information . 'agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules,
The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; .
gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill .any changes in application information will be submitted
requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local unit of government within 10 days
Oath of the change; and
1 declare that: .1 understand that failure to provide required information
.1 have read this application and all information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in
to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the license.
.all other required information has been fully disclosed;
~s;gno/~ /~ /0;&0/;/ .m...
4. A coov of the local unit of eovernment's resolution ap-
provine this aoolication must be attached to this aoolication.
5. If this application is denied by the local unit of government,
it should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Board.
"Sji~
lelk-en
" )ohnSOL
e
1. The city .mu.st sign this application if the gambling prem-
ises is located within city limits.
2. The county "AND township" must sign this application if
the gambling premises is located within a township.
3. The local unit government (city or county) must pass a
resolution specifically approving or denying this application.
Township: By signature below, the township acknowledges
that the organization is applying for a premises permit within
township limits.
Clt * or Count"
e
Mail to: Gambling Control Board
Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor
1711 W. County Road B
Roaevllle, MN 55113
Townshl **
Township Name
Signature of person receiving application
Title
Date Received
LG214(Part 2)
(Rev712!l1ll1)
LG214
(71291ll1)
e
Minnesota Lawful Gambling I
Premises Permit Application - Part 1 df 2
Premises permit number
I
B ($250) pUllttabS, tipboards, paddtewheels, raffles
C ($200) Bin~o only
o ($150) Ra~les only
!8l
New
e
Name of Organization
. '0 ~
ess of Organization .. Street or P. 0 Box (Do not use the address of your gamblirg manager)
5' i
State Zip Code C91\~ty Daytime phone number
La €-Imo 55' 01;2. LtJ kf; 'fo"7 ((dZJ 7 0 - -S'1
Name of chief executive officer (cannot be your gambling manager) Title Daytime phone number
4>o.:~rf(..j'CL- /.e.i\c.eV\ eX<?CJ...{..+f!Jt?___ relec-lor (/:;/:2) 770-Y5"'f1
Bingo Occasions !
If applying for a class A or C permit. fill in days and beginning & encirPg hours of bingo occasions:
No more than seven bingo occasions may be conducted by your owanization per week.
Day Begtnning/Ending Hours Day Begtnning/Ending Hours Day Begtnning lEnding Hours
to
to
to
to
to
to
Ifbingo wm not be conducted. chec~ here ~
I
!~~~
51'. CrOt'v- Club 4d.3 <) fYVl/Y) s't. ) <;+; tlulu--l<rrmj ",),-=sU8".2
Is the premises located within city limits? G2f'\'es D No If no, is township D organq:ed D unorganized D unincorporated
I
City and County where gambling premises is located OR Township and County where gambli~g premises is located if outside of city limits
$t,' lIuJ~+ .e.rj mlJ 0ashl~fo"1 I !
Name and address of legal owner of premis s City . State
(()/'ke.. rVJc (h(I{'riL L/L~ 5. rYJuc '" .:51.r'//(J)CJTW"~
Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? DYES t;;;PNO
If no, attach the following: .
* a copy of the lease (form LG202) with terms for at least one y~ar.
* a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions, showing "hat portion is being leased.
A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. .
to
mf/
Zip Code
5::50 (;2..
~ati*,!ii:~~~J5f::it!illa:::~ip:lea:;tifj~~r!fiiill!I:::~mftpm!ii~::~*I~:iM.i.:~$.:~~~~:~~~~~~~::::~:~::~::~I::i:~j~j::j~i:~:j::::jj~::::::;::::~::::::::i:i::::;:::::j:]:~:~:::j:::i
Address City State Zip code
e 4a3 5~ t'Y/a.;t'\. 5t.. 5+,'1 kOccter VVlN 5504~
". .
. , \
LG202
(7/10/91 )
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Lease Agreement
e
.Pr~m.iSe$:lrtJOrmaRori.<: .. U"':uu .:::::::::,:::::::::\.:::::: .uu uu.. Uu ...... ..u U' u...u .::::.:...<::::....: ..
Name and Address of Lessor
mariCL Canelak.<?--1
Name of Legal Owner of Gambling Premises
:5h ,{ (li.lo..~ii (1 f ecf- /)111<( n ~ c bv i t--e...
ame an ress 0 ease remises
st. CffO/)( Club
Name of Organization Leasing the Premises (lessee)
-
-hAm i ILl \,r;() IfJf1ce.- )'JetAJnrK.
.. .. ..J...... . ..................-..................
dCifiiblirtgABiiv1ty:::>;..;::. ....u.....u...... . ...... u.... u.. .'::::,::::..:::;> . .. . . ..
The lawful gambling activity which the organization will conduct is (check all that apply):
Address
4:2.3 S. VyJa,',1
Address
1) 3 5.
CitylZip Code Phone
q,'//l,Wf t;mti )
City/Zip cOde Phone
r!'0 i~
ress
Ity Ip
S-H l k0:A:..-RrJ rYl N
License Number, if known
DO? <;0 3
550Z'd-.
4-J. '3
5, yy\C<-t YI St.
c=J bingo
c=J raffles [=:J paddlewheels ~ pull-tabs
[=:J tipboards
e
Rent Information (See Rules 7860.0090, Subp 3)
Class A and C premises permits:
Rent for bingo and all other gambling activities conducted
during that bingo occasion may not exceed:
$200 for up to 6,000 square feet;
$300 for up to 12,000 square feet; and
$400 for more than 12,000 square feet.
I Rent to be paid per binoo occasion $
Class Band 0 premises permits:
Rent for gambling activities not including bingo
is a maximum of $1000 per month.
I Rent to be paid per month $ 0200. 00
Rent may not be based ona percentage of receipts, profits from lawful gambling, or on the number of
participants attending a bingo occasion.
An organization may not pay rent to itself or to any of its affiliates for space used for the conduct of lawful gambling.
PremiSesPes~n.iftioii..):::::::::.:::.I:?m:::.::.... '.:::::..,::,::::;:::.. ... .,:,:,:::::.:::':::::::::,::,',::.....:.;::::;.::::.::::: ::.:::,.:::..,.:,:::::,:?/{.:t::::t:::t
The area(s) leased within the premises are 1..\ feet by t:=; II J.... feet, for a total of ;1..::2... square feet.
feet by feet, for a total of square feet.
feet by feet. for a total of square feet.
J Combined total ~d- square feet
e
SkefchS: ...... . . :::.::::<:.: :.:.' ::.::::::<,:::":/(:.:...:........:..::.::..:;:::;:::::;::::.::..:.::::..:.. ::
Attach.a,sketc:.h w~ic~,~h()'N.s the location.and dimensi()n.s of the leased.<ueas.~.........................,.,..............
E ed:ivEfi>Cites::!}::'. .. . .... ... .u... ...... ..... ...... ...... .... ........: ........
The lease will gointoeffeduat12:01a:m:onu". . .c'?'viT.r19~aiidwill end at 12:00 a.m. on
19 ~for a period of at least one year.
Times.anduDa.fjs.}iJflBlng6.Ac:t1vttiT.WfHgl{::1~dl;:;~teNJ~i}:::::..:::f52f.:JWj(::Ih:::.:::::::::::.:,::::::::::::........................................... ..
The bingo occasions will be held' (a maximurTlof 7 bingo occasions per organization): ....
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (am.lp.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (a.m./p.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (am.lp.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (a.m.lp.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (am.lp.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (am.lp.m.) on (days of week)
from (hours) (a.m.lp.m.) to (am.lp.m.) on (days of week)
....-.......................
. .... .. - ., -.............
.......,..........-..
. .. .... ",d"
By agreeing to the terms of this lease, it is mutuallt agreed that:
· When leasing from a licensed bingo hall, the lessor must be legal owner oflthe property.
e · The owner of the property or the lessor may not manage gambling at the *mises.
· The lessor of the premises, his or her immediate family, and any agents or /imployees of the lessee may not
participate as players in the conduct of lawful gambling on the leased prem,ses.
. The lessor and the lessee do not have a direct or indirect financial interest i~ the distribution or manufacture
of gambling equipment. I
I
. The lessor of the premises will allow the Board or agents of the Board, the ~ommissioner of Public Safety or
agents of the commissioner, or the Commissioner of Revenue or agents of!the commissioner, and law
enforcement personnel to inspect the premises at any reasonable time, an~ permit the organization to
conduct lawful gambling at the premises according to the terms of this lease. The lessor may not impose any
conditions on the organization regarding distributors of gambling eqUiPment services, or the use of profits.
· The organization must obtain an organization license, gambling manager Ii ense and a premises permit from the
Gambling Control Board. The organization will be responsible for complyin with the laws and rules of lawful
gambling.
· The organization must have, at the gambling premises, a current inventory of gambling equipment, a sketch with
dimensions of the premises available for review, and a clear physical separation or divider between the lessee's
gambling equipment and the lessor's business equipment.
i
i
· The organization will be responsible for ensuring that the lessor's business lactivities are not conducted on the
leased premises. I
· The lease shall be terminated immediately for any gambling, liquor, prost~ution or tax evasion violations occurring
on the premises. I
I
· The lessor of the premises shall provide the lessee access to the licensed premises during any time reasonable
and necessary to conduct lawful gambling on the premises and as agreed upon in this lease.
e
· (Write in any other conditions or restrictions that will be included as part of ~he lease. Attach additional sheets if
necessary)
Le~e... Ct.'); (( hot_YI.L --n:Crt1(nc-<.1f:'t:i UY\ le55 o...J I +oh 0('P (aiiO v\
)5 h,0t .pr~-\n h\.e..Dr CD~\.~C\. 1'1 nnve... ~y-!P-O+/cy./! S'.
-::.p -h,-b (') I"'cL+i on ()o i btp Ipl] ".J.
, ( I ..j... ( I
--renv11 nD.leO t
i
This lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organizatidn conducting lawful gambling activities.
There is no other agreement and no other consideration required between the parties as to the lawful gambling and other
matters related to this lease. Any changes in this lease must be submitted to the Gambling Control Board within 10 days
of the change.
I ~at~ ~f or~arl~tiOn OfflCla: (lessee) Date
y/~7~ /040/
Title
z;y ~(cd-r'lYJL- ~i r~ c'/or
i
A ~ of this lease and sketch with dimensions must be submitted with the premises permit application renewal or when
cha;,es in the lease occur to: / ty/v /f /
~~_ ~ Gambling Control Board
//~~~ Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor
....../? ./J'/./ 1711 W. County Road B
(l /",1" S77~{ ~~ (. '~------. RoseYille, Minnesota 55113
e
(7/10/91 )
, . ~
"
e
Executive Committee
Carol Nelson. Chair
Alice Engelman
Michael Clancy
Russ Cooper
Carol Paukert
Board of Directors
Jeanne A. Campion
Michael Clancy
Russe// Cooper
Dennis Cusick
Alice Engelman
James Gi//espie
Anira Lusher
Philip A/ajor
Carol Nelson
Patricia A. 0 'Gorman
Carol Paukert
Director
Patricia R Teiken
e
.0
United Way
-:P~__ (1/
~ Peace ,
Begins (( \
at Home '-
Family Violence Network
Post Office Box 854, Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Business - (612) 770-8544
Crisis - (612) 770-0777
Intervention - (612) 770-2998
"a community project on family violence"
10-31-91
To: City of Stillwater
From: Debra Dale
Gambling Manager
The Family Violence Network is planning to open a pull
tab site at Canelake's St, Croix Club, We have signed
a one year lease with Maria Canelake. This agreement
is to sell pull tabs from a booth in the corner of the
bar next to the restaurant,
The Family Violence Network is involved in charitable
gaming in order to raise funds for our work with
battered women and their children, We provide services
to women and their families in Washington County and a
portion of Ramsey County, Stillwater is included in
our service area, Please see the enclosed information
that shows the number of crisis calls for the
Stillwater area, I have also included information on
the Family Violence Network,
I have enclosed copies of our state license information
as well as our premise permit, We need a resolution
from the City of Stillwater sent to the State Gambling
Control Office before our premise permit can be
approved.
If you need any further information please do not
hesitate to call me,
Sincerely,
G)huSJ~
Debra Dale
e
-
."
....
/
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
-------------------------
_
(UNIT PRICE CONTRACT)
NO. 5 (Final)
OWNER: CITY OF STILLWATER
OWNER'S PROJECT NO. L.I. 256
------------------------------------
------------------
ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 90081
---------------
LOCATION: CITY OF STILLWATER
------~------------------------
CONTRACTOR HYDROCON, INC.
CONTRACT DATE
April 17, 1990
-------------------------------
------------------------
P.O. BOX 129
CONTRACT AMOUNT $96,051.10
-------------------------------
----------------------
NORTH BRANCH, MN 55056
-------------------------------
CONTR. FOR COTTAGES-PHASE III, SANITARY SEWER, LIFT STATION & FORCEMAIN
--------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLIC.DATE, October 7, 1991
.00 END.
September 30, 1991
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
-----------------------
DESCRIPTION
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT
UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE
TOTAL
L MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 1 4000.00 $ 4,000.00
2. REMOVE CONCRETE C & G L.F. 30 33 4.00 $ 132.00
3. CLEARING TREE 2 2 60.00 $ 120.00
L GRUBBING TREE 2 2 60.00 $ 120.00
). 8" PVC 10'-12' DEEP L.F. 10 10.00 $
) . 8" PVC 12'-14' DEEP L.F. 145 85 12.00 $ 1,020,00
7_ 8" PVC 14'-16' DEEP L. F. 123 174 14.50 $ 2,523.00
?AGE 1 OF 4
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
, fI-
8. 8" PVC 16'-19' DEEP L.F. 545 557 17.50 $ 9,747.50
i 4,158.00 e
9. . 8" PVC 18'-20' DEE~ L.F. 163 198 21.00 $
I
10. 8" PVC 20'-22' DEEP L.F. 410 437 25.00 $ 10,925,00
11. CONS. MH OVER EX. SEWER EACH 1 1 1000.00 $ 1,000,00
12. STD. MH, 8' DEEP EACH 7 7 800.00 $ 5,600,00
13. EXCESS MANHOLE DEP~H L.F. 69.8 75,8 75.00 $ 5,685,00
14. CONS. OS DROP SECT liON EACH 2 2 1000.00 $ 2,000.00
15. CONS. IS DROP SECT~N EACH 1 1 500.00 $ 500,00
! 2 90,00
16. 8" X 6" WYE EACH 8 45.00 $
17. 6" PVC SERVICE PIPE L.F. 226 14 10.00 $ 140.00
18. 6" PVC RISER L.F. 38 14 10;00 $ 140,00
19. CR. ROCK PIPE FOUNDATION TON 210 0.01 $
20. SUBMERSIBLE PUMP L .\S. L.S. 1 1 28000.00 $ 28, 000. 00
540,00
21. ,4tt DIP FORCEMAIN, qL. 50 L.F. 45 45 12.00 $
I e
22. 4" PVC FORCEMAIN L.F. 960 978 6.00 $ 5,868,00
23. 4" INSULATION S.Y. 7.1 7,1 20.00 $ 142,00
24. JACK 12" STEEL CAS I!NG L.F. 60 68 110.00 $ 7,480.00
i
25. AGG. BASE RESTORATlipN SY-IN 1680 1 ,834 0.85 $ 1,558.90
26. BIT. WEAR SURFACE R~ST. SY-IN 280 305 2.50 $ 762.50
i
27. BIT. BINDER SURFACE! REST.SY-IN 280 105 2.40 $ 732.00
,
28. BIT. BASE SURFACE REST. SY-IN 420 41)8 2.40 $ 1,099,20
29. BIT. TACK COAT GAL. 14 22 5.00 $ 11 0 , 00
30. B618 CONC. C & G REfT. L.F. 30 33 15.00 $ 49 S, 00
31. SEEDING I ACRE 2.5 200.00 $
i ,
\
32. SEED, MIXTURE 500 LB. 125 2.00 $
e
PAGE 2 OF 4
SHORT-~LLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
k
33. MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 1 TON 5 200.00 $
- DISC ANCHORING ACRE 2.5 60.00 $
35. COM FERT., ANA. 10-10-10 LB. 1250 0.20 $
TOTAL: $ 94,688,10
e
e
PAGE 3 OF 4
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued
"
Tota 1 Contract Amount $ 96 J 051. 10
Total Amount Earned
Material Suitably Stored on S1te, Not Incoporated into Work
e
Contract Change Order No.
1
Percent. Completel 117,5
Percent Complete
Percent Complete
Contract Change Order No.
Contract Change Order No.
GROSS AMOUNT DUE............... $ 99,388,10
LESS 0 % RETAINAGE......... $ -0-
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE...,......... $ 99,388.10
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS..... $ 93,757.19 -/ \\
fOOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION.... $ 5,630. 91 ~j\0
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT v .
The undersigned Contractor herebyiswears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress.
payments received from the Owner ~n account of work performed under the contract referred to
above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under-
signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said
contract, . and (2) all
material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this
Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and
encumbrances,
Dated
October 7
,
, 19 91 .
,-
e
COUNTY OF
STATE OF
Chi sago
Minnesota
i
\
I
S5
HYDRO CON , INC.
~~a
c;h
Name and Title
President
By
}
)
I
!
day of
October , 19 91 personally aDpeared
known to me. who being duly sworn, did depose
of the Contractor above mentioned;
3efore me on this 7th
Thomas M, Hals
!nd say that he is the
Pl1esident
<IOff1 ce)
that he executed the above Applic~t10n for Payment and Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor;
and that all of the statements contained therein are true, correct and complete.
. + NoveH. HAtS I (l" ~ .../ / I. "
My Commission Expires: t'eNOTA PU6LtC-MINNtSO;-j , i,~~ . ~
.' HlSAGO COUNTY ( N ~)
, C L..-E .... 23 ,. 0 ry Uu c
. My (JI1r-' lIll"' ""'" .
...........-.~...... ~ -......---..
The undersigned has checked the Cor.tractor's Application for Payment shown above. A p~rt of
this Application is the Contractorl:s Affidavit stating that all previous payments to hlm
under this Contract have been appl~ed by him to discharge 1n full all of h1s obligations in
connection with the work covered br all prior Applications for Payment.
In accordance with the Contract. the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the
Amount Due.
e
Date
Page
\o(&(~(
SHOR~10TT H~I~KSON. INC.
By .J' L.-. '-~
4
of
4
.">
Form
IC-134
Rev. 9/89
Minnesota Department of Revenue
Withholding Affidavit for Contractors
~SS~t rix
Company name
Hydrocon, Inc,
This affidavit must be approved by the Minnesota Department of Revenue before the
State of Minnesota or any of its subdivisions can make final payment to contractors.
Minnesota 10 number
... OJ 1991
e
City
P.O. Box 129
Slate
lip Code
4585700
Mon1hlyear WOfk began
April 1990
Monlh/year WOfk ended
May 1991
Address
North Branch, MN 55056
T olal contract amoun!:
T 8lep/1one number
( 612) 332-:-5411
$100,051.10
Did you have employees work on this project? Yes
If none, explain who did the work:
Project number: L, 1. 256
Project location: Cottages - Phase III
Project owner: Ci ty of Stillwater
Address 216 North 4th Street
, .00. c+~"..~+~_ MM C"c'f\Q..,
Check the box that describes your involvement in the project and fill in all information requested in that category:
Amount s1ill due:
$4,200,00
[XI Sole contractor
o Subcontractor
If you are a subcontractor, fill in the name and address of the contractor that hired you:
e
o Prime Contractor
Busil!ess n_al1}e ..
If you subcontracted out any work on this project, all of your subcontractors must file their own
IC-134 affidavits and have them certified by the Department of Revenue before you can file your
affidavit. For each subcontractor you had, fill in the business information below, and attach a copy
of eacll subcontractor's certified IC-134. (If you need more space, attach a separate sheet.)
Addr~~L_ Owner/Officer
I declare that all information I have filled in on Ihis form is true and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I authorize
the Department of Revenue to disclose pertinent information relating 10 this project. including sending copies of this form,
to the .enme contrac~~ ?Z3a su ontractor, and 10 any su.~ntr:actorsl~!.~1!1 ~ 'p!,me C!?.ntract~. and to the ~'l!ractlng agency.
lure / II Tolle Date
_____ ~L. .:tLt,XJ _Presi~~~t_._ _. _____. 6-03-9.:..____
For certification, mail to:
Minnesota Department of Revenue, Business Trust Tax Section
Mail Station 6610, SI. Paul, MN 55146-6610
Certificate of Compliance with Minnesota Income Tax Withholding Law
a Based on records of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, I certify that the contractor who has signed this certificate has
.. fulfilled all the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 and 290.97 concerning the withholding of Minnesota income tax from
wages paid to employees relating to contract services with the state of Minnesota and/or its subdivisions.
~~~. '""''"'7~t?Z/d~ .. . u.n... ~_!~. \'j.":
e
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO, 91-218
e
ABACI, Inc.
American Heart Assn.
American Linen Supply
American National Bank & Trust
A T & T
Beberg, Byrdie
Business Records Corporation
Capitol Communications
Case Power & Equipment
Catco Parts Service
Cemstone Products
Commission of Transportation
Copy Duplicating Products
Courier, The
Croix Oil Company
Curvecrest Properties
C. W, Houle, Inc,
DAC Industries
Deblon, Diane
Driver & Vehicle Services
Ecolab Pest Elimination
Equity Title Services
Equipment Supply Inc,
Erickson, Michael
Fina Oil
Firstar Stillwater Bank
Gannon's Auto Body
Glaser, Paul
Glaser, Stuart
Gun N Smi th
Harvest States
Hogberg Decorating
Home Decorating Center
I. A, C. P.
Jacobson, Cynthia
Jae's Precast, Inc,
Jim's Building Mte.
J. L. Shiely Company
Johnson Bras, Corporation
Kriesel, Nile
Lace Company
Lakeland Ford Company
Lawton Printing
Lind, Leslie & Gladys
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission
The Map Store
Metz Baking Company
Mn, Cellular One
Mn. Cellular One
Mn, Conway Fire & Safety
Minnesota U, C, Fund
e
Reader/Printer $
Video Rental
Tissue/Towels
Issuance Fee
Long Distance Galls
Typing
2 License Books
Install Radio
Repair Case Loader
Parts
Concrete
Inspections
Developer
Publications/Newsletter
Gas/Diesel
Balance of Deposit
Repair Catch Basin
Towels/Supplies
Health INsurance
Fire Plates
Pest Control
Refund-Overpayment
Services
Remove Concrete
Gas
Oak Glen Note
Replace Weather Stripping
Boiler Engineer
Reimburse-Tuition
Target Supplies
Seed-Rogness Job
Paint-pioneer Park
Paint for Band Shell
Subscription-Newsletter
Mileage-Jacobson
Storm Sewer Repair
October Charges
Sand/Washed SAnd
Payment NO, 4
Parking/Postage
Tape/Mouth Guards
Pedal Assy,
4 Sets Code Tabs
Land Purchase
Legal Services
SAC Charge-October
Frame for Fire Map
Concession Supplies
Mobile Phone Charges
Cellular Phone-Inspections
Boots-Kroening
Unemployment
2,396.00
14.10
140,15
750.00
90.23
132.50
23.01
150,00
185,29
35,00
452,59
1,772,98
140.00
1,285,25
6,901.95
31.00
1,281.91
294,18
219.23
18.00
390,00
1,562,50
3,516,09
100,00
20,00
45,527,83
76,05
200.00
40,00
153,65
17,90
200.00
355,00
12.00
15,50
843.83
906.60
43,45
702,623.51--
16.45
389.05
35.91
30,90
927.00
6,858.00
14,211.45
103,00
35.72
58,88
299,00
84.77
213,46
MISCO
Northern States Power Co,
Northern States Power Co,
Nasvik, Joseph
Ness, George
On Site Sanitation !
Otis Spunkmeyer Cooki$s
Pony Express Reloader$
R & R Specialties
Reliable Corporation
Roettger, Don
St. Paul Stamp Works
Short Elliott Hendrickson
I
Stevensen, Mary Jo I
Stillwater Sunrise Rotary
Streichers '
Suburban Propane
T, A, Schifsky & Sons I
Traver, Joan
Twin City Testing I
United Building Center
U, S, West communicattons
Viking Office Product
Wall Street Journal
I
,
MANUAL CHECKS-OCTOBER I
Brine's
Government Training strVice
Government Training S rvice
Hansen, Donald
Junker Sanitation Ser ice
Minnesota State Treas~rer
National League of Cities
Postmaster
Radisson Arrowood
Stafford, R, H, Washington
County Treasurer I
Stafford, R, H. Washi gton
County Treasurer
Stillwater Ford Linco n
Uniglobe Metro Travel
United Parcel Service
University of Minneso a
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
Hydrocon, Inc, I
Lakeland Ford Truck Sales
Snap on Tools I
Stillwater Ford-Linco~n
Trailer Sales I
MAMA '
PC Workstation
Energy Charge
Street Lighting/Arena
Sidewalk Repairs
Reimburse-Shoes
4 REstrooms Rental
Concession Supplies
Ammunition
Equipment Parts
Toner
Re-roof Parks Dept,
Dog TAgs
Engineering
Sew Patches
Quarterly Dues (2 Qtrs,)
6 Flash Lights
Propane
F ine ~1ix
Return Damage Deposit
Test Bituminous M ~ture
Supplies
Refund-Overpayment
Supplies
Subscription
NSF Check-Blumenshein
Instructor's School
Workshop-Kriesel/Deb Ion
Reimburse-Paint Thinner
October Payment
Bldg. Permit Surcharge
Conference-Bodlovick
Postage for Meter
Institute-Wardell
Recording Fees
Recording Fees
Shift Assy,
Air Fare-Bodlovick
Shipping Charges
Juvenile Officers Institute
Payment No, 5 & Final
Brake Job
Small Tools
Repairs
32 Trees
Workshop-Kriesel
Adopted by the CouncJ.' th' 5 h d
J.S t ay of November, 1991.
263.72
6,760,94
10,614,65
146,03
52,99
200,00
83.00
198.78
790,10
59,51
2,400.00
41.65
77,585.40
32.00
190.00
594,00
191.55
394,90
600.00
1,125.00
106,32
1,562,50
265,97
109,00
e
e
25,34
310.00
50,00
4,25
70,000.00
5,636,89
410,00
1,000,00
189,00
32.00
247,00
11. 40
790,00
25.60
155.00
5,630,91
253,25
43,50
43,56
800.00
25.00
e
e
e
e
S.Carlson Home Improvement
348 So. 4th St.
Bayport, Mn, 55003
Countryside Plbg. & Htg.
753 So, Knowles
New Richmond, Wi 54017
Eberhard Construction
7529 No. Stillwater Way
Oakdale, Mn. 55128
First Landmark Builders
611 So. Snelling Ave,
St. Paul, Mn. 55116
Gorman Construction
2217 Bonnie Lane
St, Paul, Mn. 55119
Martin A, Keller
465 18th Ave, So,
So, St, Paul, Mn. 55075
Pacesetter Corporation
4343 So. 96th St.
Omaha, Ne 68127
C. R. Partridge Homes, Inc.
13809 Sunset Lk, Dr.
Burnsville, Mn. 55337
Peterson Construction Inc.
1023 No. Knowles Ave,
New Richmond, .Wi 54017
CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS
November 5, 1991
General Contractor
Excavators
Masonry & Brick Wk.
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
Renewal
Renewal
Renewal
New
New
New
New
New
New
e
e
e
.
SANDRA R. BOEHM
MICHAEL M. CARTER
CAROLE V. RYDEN
HOWARD L. BOLTER
SA.t~DR.A R. BOEHM & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2310 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 290-9119
FACSIMILE (612) 290-2534
. ADMINISTRATOR
KATHLEEN B. LINDENBERG
October 30, 1991
trr. Nile Kriesel
City Administrator
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
HE: L'a'1N".rr:mN ]HProVE:.~:r PIUJEX::T
Dear r~, Kriesel:
In reviewing our records, we note there are requests for copies which to date
~'le have not received, They are as follOvlS:
1)
Letters from SEH to Johnson Brothers Construction
Company dated after 9/5/91 and citing problems with
non-compliance of the contract~
. r
2) Letters from Johnson Brother to sm in response to
problems of non-compliance;
3) Copies of vibration monitoring done by JBC;
4) Copies of 4-week projected work schedules submitted
by JBC wie1 each of its payment applications;
5) Copies of payment application and documentation for
payments 3, 4;and 5;
6) Copies of costs charged to JBC for delays, extra
supervision, and temporary lighting caused by non-
compliance ~0.,7i th the contract;
7) Copies of JBC's daily dust control activities; and
8) Copies of Change Orders 4 and 8.
In addition, we \llould also like a copy of the original order for the new
street lights and all minutes of the construction meetings held prior to
8/29/91.
e
e
e
f
Hr. Nile Kr iesel
Dovmtown Improvement Project
October 30, 1991
Page 2
v~ v~uld appreciate receiving these copies before Novemebr 7, 1991. If you
would prefer, we could pick them up from your office before then. Please call
Ellen Anderson at 439-0266 if this is more convenient for you,
Sincerely,
SANDRA R. BOrnM AND ASSCCIATES, LID
/ ), . ~7/ /)..,~) 7 /
, " J. !/ ,(' _t/~J
L/:l./,(}'.f~ ) , . "~j 'C..A...v r
Carole V. Ryden .
CVR:vs
cc: Stillwater Merchants
City Attorney
Mayor and City Council ~~mbers
e
/D .- 3 0 ~ 1 /
/J Alii f}4 Mt (; Ii I
,S~ z:u-02-/i5 - aqA:) i !jOU WWV-er"1 ,,-- -
,. _ .-.~:if.er1 +t //'.(, ""1 D ,A-.n,' S-:-e v (j.e, v -e .J 2,!:oG I ~'" VYl _.n, Lv./ - 't<dt . _n_ ~
...-..-----5'10. (y11_..r~ w ~,-e. L'1"S.I-e~..It4.-.aV1?l.cP.Y-.c)c.{Vl to 3.C!/_
W~~r c~ ~r fl.::e ) /lVI, 7 I pYO f"{r h;' .T/1..1z Con h nUl "J',
.-A(()NJwCJ . p yc>bbWl$ //}tJd~~ le'l/~kh f:IeYu~ .
. V:::::t!~~J ~~-etf~h-~i~P1~7;J:~;f~~t:Z
~. ....S? 1000>,f(4, t/&'vS.C/!. V1t.UL ~ t:-u.JJ.. !
ua'lJ-tC$e-l!~-e~~/~lsL uif~1J .3 Jl,.
. 'ftJU "t- .~. , iA;;C~ (. '~;fIJ a V\ e.:'J~-
..-rGe VLV'1,'7fu-'1.~.uo~~-./tt;;;refi::,Mfb.~l- .
kO)lt? - .'tp CJ~.+6, .W0a:f;VU-v9!f "'lDu a--n..e",,76
. CDrrr"e-f2-, ~- r roh hAM u L~Ylc;EIfn-J i
,AXJ7' M~ ~. lDD-( rvVY~u . ~V10Y-r-t...o 1---. ~ ~
v"'-~ 1(1.. [tf; ~ l2-e.-~cl' CoIvC?f-e-r- ~.9 ;~~I tV
uu6{f)preClq+-41BJ~ _ ....yfh-t cruiY~
.......4:J:~~~ t*~!;: f; .... -~ CU"'
~ C;d~7iZj/~ Ie ~ '-1-0 Crrre;:;4
~ .",----_.. ..- ..._-_.__.~..~----,-
,_.fAEl2(C_YL. ......U.{,,~l .llf..____un n'.
It-c. (< '- Z- 13 () 'f s-7'
---Y'v\c.Gr~" \ntMP0'LS~~-:sCiJ. -"
. ;rYJot)M'1kJP' 7--fG rJal~~.Jf';Yf3 W0t-f....~
. . w-'D k~.. csbc ;t~ . 6 .....
.u . ~,_..... ..
.. ._m~a~u{ !~J-~
/to. .~.'~;}S1 d.. 37(Jj7.m .
e
e
e
~ e, \C\.. \
\ \ l5
Serving the Stillwater Area for 100 years.
October 30, 1991
Mr. Tim Thompson
Stillwater City Parks
216 North Fourth Street
St i 11 wa ter, MN. 55082
Dear Tim,
The Victorian Christmas Committee of the Stillwater Area
Chamber of Commerce would like to request the use of Pioneer
Park and its bandshell on Friday, November 29th at 5 p. m, For
the Traditional Tree Lighting Ceremonies.
We are requesting this transFer From Lowell Park to Pioneer
Park, that we may expand the Traditional Tree Lighting to
include a community sing-along and perhapes a small dance
perFormance in the bandshell.
We have recieved permission From the Ri ver Valley Lions Club
For use of thei r tree and 1 i ghts For thi s event.
Thank you For your consi deration of this request and your
continued support of the Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce.
~1/J
Sheryl E-f1arshall
Program Director
cc;
Nile Kriesel /
City Coordinator
~~,
. ,II\;
~
C'\.
\:)J
Brick Alley Building · 423 So. Main Street · Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-5127 · (612) 439-7700
e
ORDER NO, 77464
It is hereby ordered in accordance with the law governing the
Establishment of Detours that the following route is designated as a
detour for Trunk Highway No. 95 in the City of stillwater, Township of
Stillwater, County of WASHINGTON:
Beginning at the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 95 and Trunk
Highway No. 96 in the city of stillwater; thence westerly on said
Trunk Highway No. 96 for approximately 1.2 miles to its intersection
with County state Aid Highway No.5; thence southerly on said County
state Aid Highway No.5 for approximately 1.7 miles to its
intersection with Myrtle Street; thence easterly on said Myrtle street
for approximately 0.7 mile to its intersection with said Trunk Highway
No. 95 and there terminating.
Beginning again at the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 95 and County
State Aid Highway No. 23 (Chestnut street) in the city of stillwater;
thence westerly on said County state Aid Highway No. 23 for
approximately 0.1 mile to its intersection with Third Street; thence
northerly on said Third street for approximately 0.05 mile to its
intersection with Myrtle Street and there terminating.
e
During construction operations it will become necessary to route trunk
highway traffic over a detour and consequently the above described
roads will be taken over temporarily by the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation.
The use of this detour will become effective on the date that the
trunk highway markers are erected on the above designation and will
remain in effect until markers are removed.
Dated: September 13, 1991
R2299G.08
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
Edwin H. Cohoon
Acting Commissioner of Transportation
The undersigned, being a duly appointed ag€nt of the
Commissioner fer the purpose d cerlifying copies of or-
ders issued by the Con~mi5S:0ner of Transpcrlation hereby
certifies thai this is a true and correct copy of the Com-
missioner's Ord6r in the files of the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation.
_ted this /6 Z2!' day of.
0(..7'
19 C; I
'-
'It-'ll; _ ~dUl'~ 1-/- ~::'J..oo--
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By JJ. ~~ ;U~
ORDER NO. 77496
\
It is hereby ordered ~hat the route designated as a
Highway No. 95 in the \county of WASHINGTON by Order
released July 3, 1991 .and therefore said route will
original statuS.
detour for Trunk
No. 77464, was
revert to its
e
Dated: september 13, 1991
R2299G.08
Edwin H. cohoon
Acting commissioner of Transportation
e
~.. ...: OF NdNNESOT A
CCU~iTY OF RAMSEY
r I' d
. 'e ur.(:erslgne , being a duly ap,.,oi1ted t F h
r ~ .. f I ,.. . agen 0 t.
....C,..r.:I'sloner or llie purpose of cert'. ' , ,
d. ' d b ~Yll,g copies or or-
dS Issue y the C .. f
, ,;c' ,'. ommlSSloner 0 I ransp'Jr!alion herehJ
c<.L,.tleS !hat this IS a true and corree copy of tn C
r.;,~.).'~ner s Order in fhe files of the tat f M..e em-
\.., ..' f e 0 Innesota
,_ ,."..ment 0 Transportation. \ I
Dated this /6?!! day of. Or: t ...,19 ~
A,';^'f COMZ.Ys~I;Nt;' O;":;'::~SPORT A T1~N
By AI ~ ,:h;/I
\
e
e
1U11.__ l1li&11.. 14IlINIPI.
III 1IIIr\B ftMIr\B II""
lUll.... BI ...
Board of Trustees
l1inutes
October 1, 1991
Present: Casso Childs. Hansen. Kalinoff. Ruch. Welshons. and
Bertalllio.
1.
Call to order:
There being a quorum present the lleeting was called to order at
6:43 pll by President Hansen.
Adoption of the agenda:
With the addition of itells 8.D and 8.E agenda accepted as mailed.
Public Co..entary: None.
lIinutes:
notion to accept, with corrections. the llinutes for Auqust 6,
September 9. and the special lleeting of September 21. Seconded.
passed unanillously
Co..unications:
Noted check froll Rivertown Restorations for $400: to assist in
fralling of various historical documents.
Noted check froll $300 froll Washington County Friends of the
Library.
Noted that St. John's University will host a retrospective
architectural exhibit honoring neyer. Scherer. and Rockcastle.
5. Finance report and payaent of bills: noved to pay bills in
the amount of $6.326.52. SIp unanillously.
2.
3.
4.
e
e
6. CoJD.i.ttee reDorts:
Adainistra tion - Later.
Budget and Finance - Noted that the Truth in Taxation hearing
will be held November 19.
Building and Grounds - Report was handed out.
Planning - Staff will respond in November to planning document.
Public Rela tions - Noted archi tectural award story. Jan Brewer
has assignment to prepare stories.
Special Projects - None.
WCL Liaison Report - Noted WCL book sale.
7. Old Business:
A. Public Access Catalog - WCL/Dynix/Consultant negotiations
contiue. Will likely be discussed in WCL/SPL meeting on Oct. 2.
B. lteeting Rooll Rental Fee for "For-Profit" Groups - Reference
Desk is having problells distinguishing non-profit from for-
profit. Following discussion Director will propose a solution.
C. None.
D. WCL/SPL Contract Review - Schmidt is working on proposed ~
language. .
E. notion that SPL participate in St. Paul Foundation Community
Pooled Incoae Fund. Seconded/Passed unaniaously.
F. Community Program - Committee on Community Programming
continues to aeet; expects to bring a report including a mission
statement and alvision for a successful program to the December
1991 aeeting. ~otion of support; seconded/passed unanimously.
G. Other - Nonel
8. Bev Business:
A. Statistics Review - Director asked for comments about nature
of Statistical ~eport the Board would like to see. following
discussion Director will give response in November.
B. Joint Board neeting - Director will arrange for November.
C. Board Vacancies - President reported that incumbents whose
appointments expire are elegible for and wish to be reappointed.
He will ask the I Uayor to do so.
D. Bid to cleanland Repair Air Conditioning System - Director
described probl~ms with air conditioner probleas and proposed a
solution. notion to authorize Director to accept a bid trom
Equipaent Supply Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,320 for
specified repairs.
E. Discussion o~ Parking Problems in Back of Library - Director
reported that p_rking by occupants of and visitors to building
north and east 9f back parking lot are parking in the library lot
and interferinglYith library use of that lot. She is pursuing
problem with City Attorney and looking into other remedies.
e
9. Presidents: It port - Handed out.
10. Director. s
- Handed out.
11. Adjourlment-
The agenda item being completed and no other business being
before the Boarf President Hansen adjourned the meeting at 8:16
pm.
e
'li
s: ,~
o ~
~ 1a
~ ~ ~
~ - 'il
~ ~'""
u ~ ~
~ ,~~
j ~ iF-~
, .- ~
y t: ~
'I::S t:I
~ ;;:
e
\ \ \ r~, 1 .
W t ~~
~ -'\ ' 1
~. ~~~ ~
\ ~ ~~ R
-:\ ~ . ~ ~
~~ ~ t~
~ ~ ~
~ 4, ~ ~
~
&
-t..
e
e
e
tit
*
JOHNSON BROS.
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 1002 Lilchfield. Minnesota 55355-1002
Telephone (612) 693-2871
Telex (RCA) 292875 JBCL VR
Fax (612) 693-9192
November 4, 1991
Residents / Business Owners
Downtown stillwater
RE: ROl,D CLOSURE
Dear citizens:
Myrtle Street will be closed from Main street to Third street
beginning Nov. 5, 1991 at 7:30 A.M.. The detour for Myrtle Street
will be Greely street to Churchill street to Third Street and will
be marked as such.
If you have any questions or concerns, please call Mike or Steve at
439-3870.
Sincerely,
JOHNSON BROS. CORPORATION
~~
Michael LaQua
Project Engineer
October 30, 1991
Ms Cindy Ca1ease
Registered Environmental Health Specialist
Washington County Department of Public Health
14900 51st Street North, P.O. Box 5
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Ms Ca1ease,
In follow up to' your visit and subsequent letter of October 28,
1991, I would like to clarify the notion that we r.ave been and/or
are dumping used oil.
4It We never have and we never will dump oil for any -eason and have
always collected used oil and transported ~he containers to a local
garage.
The oil you noticed around our locomotive was a very small amount
which spilled inside the locomotive and leaked out onto the ground,
The oil has been removed since your visit and we will make every
effort to minimize leakage.
JdB/LAH
cc: Nile Kriesel, City of Stillwater Coordinator
e
~~\
6'"
~~~. .
601 NORTH MAIN, P.O. BOX 573, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082/612-430-3000
r illwater
"~ --- - ~
---- - -\~
THE BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA J
November 5, 1991
Mr. William Crawford
District Engineer
c/o Mike Louis, Project Manager
Mn/DOT - Metropolitan District
3485 Hadley Avenue North
Oakdale, MN 55128
Dear Mr. Crawford:
e
The Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce has been facilitating
meetings between Oak Park Heights, Stillwater, Washington County
and Mn/DOT regarding the Highway 36 st. Croix River crossing.
Recent meetings have focused on traffic concerns, road
improvement alternatives, secondary streets and access to various
areas along Highway 36 west of Highway 95. As part of the
discussions, the need for detailed' traffic forecasts was
identified.
We have since obtained the enclosed proposal for a traffic study
from Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. The study will provide
traffic forecasts on local streets and County roads both parallel
to and connecting to Highway 36. The study will assist both
Cities in comprehensive land use planning and transportation
system planning. It will allow Washington County to evaluate
County road needs associated with both land development and
Highway 36 improvement alternatives. Mn/DOT will benefit by
having detailed traffic data for interchange ramps and
intersection analysis. Data will be beneficial to all parties
regardless of what final bridge corridor and alignment are
selected.
e
The cost of the study is estimated at $11,800 by SEH. The fee
will be based on actual work performed with a cost not to exceed
$11,800. The City of Stillwater, City of Oak Park Heights and
Washington County have each agreed to fund $3,000 towards the
study with an understanding that Mn/DOT will also fund $3,000.
We further understand that this letter, signed by Stillwater, Oak
Park Heights and Washington County representatives, will serve as
a memorandum of understanding with Mn/DOT, This will allow the
study to proceed as soon as possible to prevent delays in Mn/DOT
study process from Highway 36 corridor.
Mr. William Crawford
November 5, 1991
Page #2
e
We sincerely appreci~te the cooperation of Mn/DOT in funding this
study and in working I with our local officials.
I
I
Sincerely, .
Wally Abrahamson, Maror, City of Stillwater
I
Barb O'Neal, City oflOak Park Heights
\
I
e
Don Scheel, Washingtqn County Board Chairman
I
e
t131N30 3DIAd3S
�It��ia11
Jimm
I33HM 9/8
H31N3D ADIAHJS
I33HM 9/8
H31N3D ADIAHJS