The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-09-19 CC Packet .4 . . . ruh! /0 _ AGENDA STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL September 19, 1989 Special Meeting Regular Meeting 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 4:30 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. Discussion of Budget - Lily Lake Recreation Center 2. Executive Session 7:00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER I NVOCATI ON ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular & Recessed Meetings - September 5, 1989. INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 1. River Valley Lions - Presentation of Plaque. 2. Request for use of Lowell Park for "Taste of the Valley" festival. 3. Paul Weiler - Youth Service Bureau 4. Jim Aysta - Discussion of Forest Hills/Greeley St. Project. 5. Dick Ernst - Request to build model home behind Greeley Square. STAFF REPORTS PUBLI C HEARl NGS 1. This is the day and time for the public hearing to determine whether abatement action should be taken by the City for failure of the owners of the property at 410 No. Fourth St., Grover J. Simms & Donna Simms, to take remedial action as required by the Notice of Intent to repair the steps, cut weeds and dispose of rubbish. Notice of the hearing was sent to the property owners. 2. This is the day and time for the public hearing to determine whether abatement action should be taken by the City for failure of the owner of the property at 1014 W. Ramsey St., John L. Person, to take remedial action as required by the Notice of Intent to repair various parts of the property and dispose of rubbish. Notice of the hearing was sent to the property owners. 1 ~ .. 3. This is the day and time for the public hearing relating to the proposed modification of the Development Program for Development Dist. No.1 and the proposed modifi ation of the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating to . Tax Increment Finan ing Dist. No.1, located therein. Notice of the earing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 31, 1989 and sent to affected property owners. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Continuation of Nui ance Abatement Hearing - John Steffen, 309 E. Willow St., elimination of tall grass & weeds from property. 2. Report o~ negotiati ns - Purchase of land for No. Second St. parking lots. 3. Possible appointmen to Port Authority to fill vacancy. NEW BUSINESS 1. DNR request to acqu re City land. 2. Possible first read ng of Ordinance, amending Chap. 30.01, Sub. 8, Garbage & Rubbish Removal F es. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS DELEGATIONS (Continued) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Resolution Directin Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8160) 2. Applications (List 0 be supplied at Meeting). 3. Set Public Hearing ate of October 3, 1989 for the following Planning .,; Cases: a. Case No. ZAM/89 43 - Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Lots 4 & 5 (currently desi nated 6 & 7) of Dallager1s Estates from RB, Two Family Residential to A, Single Family Residential. b. Case No. SUP/89 55 Special Use Permit to conduct an over-the-phone sales & service company for pool supplies at 313 W. Churchill St. in the RB, Two Fam ly Residential Dist., Richard LaCasse, Applicant. c. Case No. SUP/89 60 - Special Use Permit for the placement of a 12 ft. by 48 ft. tempo ary structure to be used as office space behind an existing buildi g at 232 No. Main St. in the CBD, Central Business Dist., Martha C nway, Applicant. d. Case No. SUB/89 63 - Preliminary Plat Approval for a Minor Subdivison of two lots int three lots located on Old Stonebridge Tr. (Lots 6 & 7, Block 1, Dal ager1s Estates) in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Washingt n Co. Abstract Co., Applicant. e. Case No. V/89-6 - Variance Request to the Stillwater Floodplain Ordinance for t e construction of an enclosed parking garage below a four-story offi e building located at 319 No. Main St., McGuire, Engler & Davis, Applicants. f. Case No. V/89-6 - Variance Request to the maximum sq. footage required for an accessory structure (120 sq. ft. allowed, 280 sq. ft. proposed) for t e construction of a storage bldg. at 712 W. Oak St. in ~ the RB, Two Fam ly Residential Dist., Thomas Gerson, Applicant. g. Case No. ZAT/SA /89-6 - Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment & Subdivision Ordinance Text endment relating to a new Parks Dedication Policy for the City of Sti lwater, City of Stillwater, Applicant. : h. Case No. ZAT/89 7 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the parking regulations in he City of Stillwater, City of Stillwater, Applicant. I I 2 ~ . . i. Set Public Hearing for Oct. 17, 1989 for review of visual conspicuousness of alterations and expansion of residence at 120 Lakeside Dr. in the Duplex Residential Bluffland/Shoreland Dist., Allen Rousseau, Applicant. 4. Request for sewer rate adjustment at 200 So. 3rd St. and 121 No. Greeley St. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS STAFF REPORTS (Continued) COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS 1. Letter from Ed Stuart - Resignation from Downtown Plan Action Committee. 2. Complaint regarding Popeye's Noise Pollution - Marie Jahnke. 3. Stop Sign Request, So. Third & Orleans Streets - Ronald & Jean Schad. 4. Copy of Washington Co. "Request for Board Action", Junker, Sanitation. 5. Washington Co. Board reply to City's Resolution regarding the Junker Sanitation suspension. 6. Richard Ernst's request for streetlights in the Forest Ridge Addition. 7. NSP letter announcing proposed rate increase. 8. Letter announcing the "Do the Soo" event in Grant Township. ~ QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM NEWS MEDIA ADJOURNMENT 1. Executive Session to discuss Contract negotiations. . 3 . . . . REGULAR MEETING STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 5, 1989 4:30 P.M. The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson. Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble (arrived at 4:37 P.M.), Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Absent: None Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel City Attorney Magnuson Finance Director Blazek Public Works Director Junker Consulting Engineer Moore Firefighter-Eng. Stevensen Parks Director Blekum Police Officer Wardell Comm. Dev. Director Russell City Clerk Johnson Press: Mike Marsness, Stillwater Gazette Julie Kink, St.Croix Valley Press Others: Mr./Mrs. Burtzlaff, Mark Vierling, Mr./Mrs. Granquist, David Johnson. INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS 1. Jim Stevensen - Request for Fire Dept. Relief Association increase. Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick, to approve the request of the Fire Department Relief Ass'n. to grant the raise for all members at pension level to $2,000 per year of active service. (All in favor). PUBLIC HEARING 1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to determine whether grounds exist to order the cutting of hedges, located on the east side of property lining the City boulevard on North Broadway near E. Wilkins St., which obstruct the view of motorists. Notice of the hearing was sent to the property owner. Councilmember Kimble arrived at 4:37 P.M. Officer Wardell, who took the initial complaint regarding the obstruction of view for motorists, explained the nature of the complaint. She said if motorists drive in a lawful and safe manner, there should be no problem with the bushes obstructing the view. 1 . . . , Stillwater City Council Minutes Regular Meeting September 5, 1989 Bill Burtzlaff, property owner, explained that this is a dirt road and the hedges act as a buffer -- they would prefer to keep them higher than four ft., but have thinned them out. Sandy Burtzlaff reported she has discussed the issue with the neighbors who state they have no problem with the bushes. Officer Wardell said the view has improved since the Burtzlaffs have trimmed the bushes. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. Council discussed the obligation of the City and whether there would be any liability. Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to follow the Police Dept. recommendations denying the request that the hedge at 324 E. Wilkins St. be trimmed to four ft. in height, but requiring that they be thinned and the growth of the hedges be monitored semi-annually. (All in favor). STAFF REPORTS 1. Finance Director - Addition of Shearson, Liehman, Hutton to Depositories Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Counci1member Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution adding Shearson, Liehman, Hutton to the City's 1989 list of Depositories. (Resolution No. 8138) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell ,Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Change of IBM Maintenance Contract to WyBrite Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve the maintenance agreement change to WyBrite, Inc. for the IBM System 36 and the two PC's in Finance and Administration. (All in favor). Maintenance Contract for Lanier Word Processors Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve dropping the maintenance contract for the two Lanier word processors, but keeping it for the printer, in the Administration Dept. (All in favor). Purchase of New Copy Machine Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve the purchase of a Konica 5503 2MR copy machine for the City offices. (All in favor). Budget Meeting - September 19, 1989, 4:30P.M. Council agreed to meet at 4:30 P.M. on September 19, 1989 to discuss the 1990 Lily Lake Budget with Bob Bielenberg. 2 Stillwater City Council Mi utes Regular Meeting September 5, 1989 Setting Budget Hearing for October 17, 1989 Motion by Councilmember Bo lovic , seconde y Councilmember Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution setting the 1990 Budget Hearing for October 17, 1989 at 7:00 P.M., and the date of October 24, 1989, 7:00 P.M. for a reconvened meeting, if nec ssary. (Resolution No. 8139) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodl vick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Remova 1 of L. 1. 171 & 85 from the "Green Acres II status Motion by Councilmember Bo lovic , seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution removing L.r. 171 from the "Green Acres" status and ordering preparation of th proposed assessment. {Resolution No. 8157) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodl vick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Motion by Councilmember Bo lovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adopt the appropri ate reso 1 ut ion removi ng L. I. 185 from the "Green Acres II status and ordering preparation of th proposed assessment. (Resolution No. 8158) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodl vick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Finance Director's Att ndance at Conference Motion by Councilmember Fa rell, secon e by Councilmember Bodlovick to authorize attendance of th Finance Director at the Minnesota Finance Officer's conference in Al xandria on Oct. 11, 12 & 13 at an approximate cost of $260. (All in favor). 2. Public Safety Director - No Report. 3. Public Works Director Installation of Street ights - St. Mary's Church - Motion by Councllmember Bo lovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to honor the request of St. Mary's hurch and authorize the installation of three new style street lights to be nstalled by Northern States Power and to be paid by the Church. (All in favor. Removal of Tree on Thi d St. Motion by Councilmember Bo lovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to authorize the removal of a diseased tree on Third St. at a cost of $750, with payment of $300 to be made from the Dutch Elm fund and the remainder of $450 to be paid by the resident (All in favor). 3 '- . ~ . . . . , Stillwater City Council Minutes Regular Meeting September 5, 1989 Award of Bid for P.W. Single Axel Diesel Dump Truck Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to adopt the appropriate resolution awarding the bid for the Public Works Single Axel Diesel Dump Truck to North Star International Trucks, Inc. in the amount of $44,489.53. (Resolution No. 8141). Ayes - Councilmembers Sodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Request for Stop Sign at 5th & Hazel Streets Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to refer the request for a stop sign at No. 5th St. and Hazel St. to the Police Dept., with a report to be made at the meeting on September 19, 1989. (All in favor). Request for Signage at Wildpines & Eagle Ridge Tr. Public Works Director Junker will forward petitions received for signage for Wildpines & Eagle Ridge Trail to the Public Safety Director. 4. Parks Director - Parks Director Blekum reported on the progress of Sonse Field. 5. City Clerk - Attendance of City Staff at Munici-Pals Meeting, Oct. 19, 1989 Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by CouncilmemberKimble to authorize the attendance of seven employees from the Police and Administration Dept. at the Municipals Meeting on October 19, 1989 at an approximate cost of $131.25. (All in favor). INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS Granquist Development Agreement Mark Vierling, representing the Granquist family, was at the meeting to discuss the problem regarding the description relating to Outlot "Z" and access to the Granquist property as listed in the Development Agreement. Their interpretation of the events from the March 7, 1989 meeting was that the access included all of Outlot "Z" and the City interpretation included only that portion that is necessary for street access. After extensive discussion, a decision was made to continue this issue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting. RECESS Council recessed the meeting at 5:50 P.M. to discuss the Oak Glen issue in Executive Session. Resolutions: No. 8138 - Adding Shearson, Liehman, Hutton to List of Depositories. 4 Stillwater City Council Min te~ Regular Meeting September 5, 1989 No. 8139 - Set Hearing Date of Oct. 17, 1989 for Budget Hearing. No. 8141 - Award Bid for P. . Single Axel Diesel Dump Truck. No. 8157 - Order Preparatio of Proposed Assess. for L.I. 171. No. 8158 - Order Preparatio of Proposed Assess. for L.I. 185. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY LE 5 \ i ~ I . . . . ~ RECESSED MEETING STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL MINUTES September 5, 1989 7:00 P.M. The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson. Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Absent: None Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel City Attorney Magnuson Finance Director Blazek Consulting Engineer Moore Planning Comm. Chair. Fontaine Public Safety Director Mawhorter Comm. Dev. Director Russell City Clerk Johnson Press: Mike Marsness, Stillwater Gazette Julie Kink, St.Croix Valley Press Others: David Johnson, Mark Vierling, Mr.jMrs. Granquist, Andy Merry, Kathy Sanford & Attorney, Dick Ernst, Richard Ernst, Vern Stefan, Barry Stack, Mitch Hurlburt, Ron Zaniewski, Chuck & Judith Dougherty, Mr.jMrs. Mike McGuire, Louie Garavalia, Doug Buberl. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember-Bodlovick to approve the following minutes as presented: Special Meeting, August 8, 1989; Special & Regular Meetings, August 15, 1989; Special Meeting, August 17, 1989; and Special Meeting, August 22, 1989. (All in favor). INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS 1. Continuation of Discussion of Development Agreement - Donald Granquist property. Mark Vierling, representing the Granquists, announced that they have accepted David Johnson's offer of conveyance to Mr. Granquist of the area shown in Barry Stack's drawing for the amount of $5,000, with IIno stringsll attached. Mr. Vierling further stated they are asking the City, in confirmation, to make sure that the street will fit City standards for adequate width and size. City Engineer Moore stated the street has a 60 ft. right-of way and is acceptable to City standards. Further discussion followed, including condemnation if the purchase agreement cannot be completed by the Sept. 25 deadline and assessments. Mr. Vierling concluded by saying the property will be deeded directly to the Granquists 1 I Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 I I . and will not come to he City of Stillwater, so therefore, no Development Agreement is required. 2. Mike Downs & Patti Korlin - Request to use Legion Beach for wedding ceremony during summer of 1990. Council referred Mi ke Downs and Patti Korl into St. Joseph I s Townshi p regarding their request for the use of Legion Beach for their wedding in the summer of 1990. fter approval by the Township, they were advised to come back to the Cit for final approval. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a request for a Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for an existing garage (2 ft. proposed, 5 ft. required) at 412 W. Wilkins St. in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Stanley & Elizabeth McDonald, Applicants. Case No. Vj89-46. Notice of the Haring was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and opies were mailed to affected property owners. 2. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing on a Variance Request to the sideyard & reary rdsetback requirements (2 ft. proposed, 5 ft. required) for the construction of a 16 ft. by 22 ft. single car garage at 418 W. Wilkin St. in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Stanley & Elizabeth McDonald, pplicants. Case No. Vj89~47. Notice of the H aringwas published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and ailed to affected property owners. 3. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing on a Subdivision Request for three lots totaling 16,605 sq. ft. into two lots of 9,180 sq. ft. and 7,425 sq. ft., with odification to lot size requirements at 412 & 418 W. Wilkins St. in the R , Two Family Residential Dist., Stanley & Elizabeth McDonald, Applicants. Case No. SUBj89-48. Notice of the Haring was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and ailed to affected property owners. Comm. Dev. Oirector ussell explained the above three combined requests to resubdivide three 10 s into two lots and two variances -- one for an existing garage and second for construction of a new attached garage to the existing residen e at 418 W. Wilkins St. The Planning Commission approved the request. Mr. Johnson, a next oor neighbor, stated that he agrees with the plan. Mayor Abrahamson clo ed the public hearing. Mot i on by Counei lmember arre 11, seconded by Counci 1 member Bod 1 ovi ck to approve the request of S anley & Elizabeth McDonald for a Variance to the 2 . Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 sideyard setback requirement for an existing garage, Case No. V/89-89-46; a Variance to the sideyard & rearyard setback requirements for the construction of a 16 ft. by 22 ft. single car garage, Case No. V/89-47; and a Subdivision for three lots totaling 16,605 sq. ft. into two lots of 9,180 sq. ft. and 7,425 sq. ft at 412 & 418 W. Wilkins St. in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Case No. SUB/89-48 with condition. (All in favor). 4. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a request for a Variance to the Fence Ordinance for a 3-1/2 ft. fence (4 ft. required,) at 1421 No. First St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist., Ned & Christine Windmiller, Applicants. Case No. V/89-52. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. ~ 5. Mr. Russell stated Mr. Windmiller was not present, as yet, to discuss his case. Mr. Russell explained, at Council request, that Mr. Windmiller proposed to use part of his neighbor's fence for securing his swimming pool, however, the fence does not meet City requirements for pool fencing. The Planning Commission denied the request. Council continued this case until later in the meeting when Mr. Windmiller will be present. 'This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a Variance and Design Permit Request for the placement of an awning sign and parking review for a pool hall at 112 No. Main St. in the CBD,Central Business Dist., Kathy & Gerald Sanford, Applicants. Case No. PR/DP/V/89-53. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell explained the proposal for the placement of an awning sign above the south entrance of Cat Ballou's (the entrance to the pool hall on the second floor) and parking review for the new pool hall. It was noted that parking is not available on site, however, City parking is directly across the street with approximately 70 spaces. Discussion followed regarding conditions including removal of the sandwich board sign and statue. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the use and awning as shown in the plans. John Stocks, representing the Sanfords and Cat Ballou's, stated Cat Ballou's II will be a separate entity and should be separate from the sign on the sidewalk. They would like to see the request approved without restrictions and the enforcement of sandwich board signs should be uniform. Also, the statue is humorous and a good business relations device. They would like it to continue. Discussion followed. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. ~ 3 I Stillwater City Council inutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 Motion by Councilmember the request for a Varian sign and parking review Central Business Dist., Case No. PR/DP/V/89-53. . imble, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve e and Design Permit for the placement of an awning or a pool hall at 112 No. Main St. in the CBD, s conditioned, Kathy & Gerald Sanford, Applicants. (All in favor). 6. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing on a Variance request to the sideyard setback requirement (3 ft. proposed, 5 ft. required) for a 24 ft. by 10 ft. garage addition at 1112 W. Linden St. in the RA, Single Family Residential D'st., Ronald A. Zaniewski, Applicant. Case No. V/89-57. Notice of the Haring was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and ailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell explaine the request is to construct a garage addition to an existing single car ttached garage, no changes to the existing driveway will be made and the existing evergreen shall remain. The Planning Commission recommend u approval with retaining the condition regarding the slope of the roof an eliminating the condition regarding retaining the evergreen. Mayor Ab ahamson closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember odlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve the request for a Varian e to the sideyard setback requirement for a 24 ft. by . 10 ft. garage addition a 1112 W. Linden St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist., retai ing the condition regarding the slope of the roof and eliminating the conditio regarding retaining the evergreen, Ronald A. Zaniewski, Applicant. C se No. V/89-57. (All in favor). 4. Continuation of the ublic Hearing on the request for a Variance to the Fence Ordinance, Ned & Christine Windmiller, applicants. Case No. V/89-52. Mr. Windmiller state The safety factor wa maintenance free fen variance. Mayor Abr Motion by Councilmember request for a Variance t No. First St. in the RA, Windmiller, Applicants. he did not like the idea of two parallel fences. discussed. Council advised him to erect a e on the property line and he would not require a hamson closed the public hearing. imble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to deny the the Fence Ordinance for a 3-1/2 ft. fence at 1421 Single Family Residential Dist., Ned & Christine Case No. V/89-52. (All in favor). 7. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing on a Variance Request to the Sign Ordinance f r the placement of a new 4 ft. by 20 ft. pylon sign, at the same location as the present sign, at Crown Auto, 14450 60th St. No. 4 . . . Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 in the IP-C, Industrial Pk. Comm. Oist., Richard Fox, Applicant. Case No. V/89-58. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell explained the applicant wishes to replace the existing sign with a new free-standing sign which would not adversely affect the area. The square footage of the sign area will be decreased and will improve the visual image of the signed in the area. The Planning Commission approved the request. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve the request for a Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of a new 4 ft. by 20 ft. pylon sign, at the same location as the present sign, at Crown Auto, 14450 60th St. No. in the IP-C, Industrial Pk. Comm. Oist., Richard Fox, Applicant. Case No. V/89-58. (All in favor). 8. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a Special Use Permit request for a concession stand in the Isaac Staples Mill Bldg. at 402 No. Main St. in the CBO, Central Business Oist., Terri Brine, Applicant. Case No. SUP/89-59. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell reported that the applicant wishes to open a concession stand in the Isaac Staples Sawmill Building with a window for outdoor service facing Main St. No tables will be set up and the stand will not draw extra vehicular traffic. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve the request for a Special Use Permit for a concession stand in the Isaac Staples Mill Bldg. at 402 No. Main St., in the CBO, Central Business Oist., as conditioned, Terri Brine, Applicant. Case No. SUP/89-59. (All in favor). 9. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a Design Permit for the renovation and addition of a storefront and Parking Review at 212 No. Main St. in the CBO, Central Business Oist., LeVerne & Sharon Stefan, Applicants. Case No. OP/PR/89-61. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 25, 1989 and mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell presented background on this case, stating the request is to renovate the storefront of the "Wrap & Ship" building and add an interior fire stair to the building. Mr. Fontaine stated the Planning Commission wished to emphasize the brick face of the staircase. 5 I Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 Tim Stefan asked for omission of the condition requlrlng the brick face and to keep the stucco surface which would be temporary and would be changed in about two ears. Council discussion included requiring the applicant to again appear before Council if the brick face is not constructed withi n three to fi ve years. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve the request for a Design Permit and Parking Review for renovation and addition of a storefront at 212 No. Main St. in the CBD, Central Business Dist., temporarily eliminating t e condition requiring a brick surface on the Main St. face of the staircase, LeVerne & Sharon Stefan, Applicants. Case No. DP/PR/89-61. (All in fav r). 10. This is the day and t'me for the continuation of the discussion regarding the Public Hearing on consideration of a request for a variance to the lot size requirements (10,000 sq. ft. required, 8,316 sq. ft. provided) for a single family residen e at 1914 No. First St. in the RA Single Family Residential Dist., Mi ch Hurlburt, Applicant. Case No. V/89-56. Notice of the he ring was published in the Stillwater Gazette on August 4, 1989 and ma'led to affected property owners. Consulting EngineerM ore stated he had reviewed the property and presented plans for c nstruction of a standard City street which would cost $495 per front f ot. He also presented a second option which consists of overlayin the existing street for a cost of $9.31 per front foot. He also stated there is adequate land for the drainfield. Bob Sherlock, 1912 No. 1st St., a next door neighbor, stated he does not want to pay assessmen s just to put in another house and stated concerns regarding the narrow treet and inability to turn a car around. . Mitch Hurlburt, appli ant, stated the new driveway will be wider and would make it more convenie t to turn around. Discussion followed i eluding further concerns regarding the narrow street and liability of the ity, and the fact that this is a "spec" house. Mayor Abrahamson clos d the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember F rrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to deny the request for a Varianc to the lot size requirements for a single family residence at 1914 No. Fir t St. in the RA Single Family Residential Dist., Mitch Hurlburt, Applicant Case No. V/89-56. (All in favor). 6 . . . ....~.-...-._,~...: _: .:~;:-'... __..-..'.-,_,~.,~, .J.-_'_";'~.w'." Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 11. This is the day and time for continuation of the Public Hearing on a request for a Preliminary Plat Approval to subdivide an 8.68 acre lot into two lots of 2.87 and 5.81 acres at the northwest corner of the intersection of Washington Ave. & Curve Crest Blvd. in the Industrial Pk. Dist., Curve Crest Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUB/89-35. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on July 21, 1989 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. Comm. Dev. Director Russell announced the applicant has withdrawn his request. Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to accept the withdrawal of the request for a Preliminary Plat Approval to subdivide an 8.68 acre lot into two lots at the northwest corner of the intersection of Washington Ave. & Curve Crest Blvd. in the Industrial Pk. Dist., Curve Crest Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUB/89-35. (All in favor). 12. This is the day and time for the continuation of the Public Hearing to determine whether the building located at 1218 So. Second St. (Garavalia property) and legally described as Lot 10, Block 3, Churchill and Nelson Second Addition, should be razed, removed and demolished. Public Safety Director Mawhorter reported that Officer Swanson reviewed the property and said it is being renovated, however, work on the garage has not been started. Mr. Garavalia stated debris and rocks are piled against the garage, but he will remove it when the back-fill has been completed. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to grant an additional 30-day extension (to Oct. 3, 1989) of the Public Hearing to determine whether the building located at 1218 So. Second St. (Garavalia property) and legally described as Lot 10, Block 3, Churchill & Nelson Second Addition should be razed, removed and demolished. (All in favor). UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Review of exterior modification of Carriage House located at 306 W. Olive St. as Variance condition of approval, Chuck Dougherty, Applicant. Mr. Russell explained that the applicants have requested new additions to be constructed on the southeast and north sides of the structure, consisting of a deck, an entryway and carport. As a condition of approval, they will combine the three lots and sewer and water services to the Carriage House will be provided according to the Public Works Director's requirements. 7 Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve the plans for modification of the Carriage House located at 306 W. Olive St. as proposed. (Ayes - 4; Nays - 1, Councilmember Bodlovick). Council recessed for five minutes and reconvened at 8:50 P.M. 2. Final Plat approval ior 42 lot subdivision located east of So. Greeley St. on 61st St. (behind Creeley Square Convenience Center) in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Parlay Group, Applicant. 3. Final PUD approval fer 42 attached single family dwelling units with a zero setback on one tide, located east of So. Greeley St. on 61st St. (behind Greeley Square Convenience Center) in the RB Two Family Residential Dist., Pcrlay Group, Appllcant. Mr. Russell explainee that Concept PUD and Preliminary Plat Approval were given by the Council on August 1, and a landscape plan and final plat have been submitted. Fur her discussion and comments involved the 10% in-lieu park fee requested t( be paid before recording of final plat. The applicant does not w sh to pay this fee because he has contributed heavily toward the developmer t of a road which has also benefited the School Dist. Mr. Ernst also state( there is a provision in the ordinance regarding a $50.00 per lot fee ar d that he had to dedicate an 80 ft. right-of-way. He . also requested to st rt a model home this fall. I Moti on by Counci lmember t imbl e, seconded by Counci lmember Opheim to approve the request for Final Pl t approval for a 42 lot subdivision and Final PUD approval for 42 attached single family dwelling units with a zero setback on one side, located east 0 So. Greeley St. on 61st St. (behind Greeley Sq. Convenience Center) in t e RB Two Family Residential Dist., as conditioned and sett i ng the Park Dedi cat on fee at $7,500, Parl ay Group, Appl i cant. Case No. PUD/89-50 & SUB/89-49. Ayes - 4; Nays - 1, Councilmember Farrell). 4. Resolution approving Community Development Grant Application (acquisition of Mulberry Point property). Motlon by Councilmember imble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to adopt the appropriate resolutinn approving the Community Development Grant Application for acquisit on of Mulberry Point property. (Resolution No. 8241) Ayes - Councilmembers Bo~lovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 5. Resolution authorizing & implementing a Joint Recycling Program with the City of Oak Park Heights. 8 . . . Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt the appropriate resolution authorizing and implementing a Joint Recycling Program with the City of Oak Park Heights. (Resolution No. 8136) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 6. Review of appraisals for purchase of land for parking lots along Second St. between Mulberry and Myrtle Streets. Mr. Russell recommended that Council direct City Staff to take steps to negotiate a purchase price. Discussion followed of previous offers received. Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember authorize City Staff to proceed to negotiate the purchase No. Second St. for acquisition for parking lot purposes. Councilmember Bodlovick and Mayor Abrahamson). Farrell to price of land along (Ayes - 3; Nays - 2, NEW BUSINESS 1. Resolution No .8134 - Amending the 1989 Budget. Mot i on by Council member Ki mbl e, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt the appropriate Resolution amending the 1989 Budget. (Resolution No. 8134) Ayes - Council members Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 2. Request for annexation of 2.8 acres of land from Stillwater Township to City of Stillwater, located east of Neal Ave. and south of Eagle Ridge Drive. City Attorney Magnuson advised that notice will have to be served on the municipality and Municipal Board. Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt the appropriate Resolution approving the annexation request for 2.8 acres of land, three lots, located east of Neal Ave. and south of Eagle Ridge Trail (Krogstad property). (Resolution No. 8143) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 3. City Attorney's report regarding request of Vern Stefan to investigate the ownership of the alleys adjacent to his business on No. Main St. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution designating Myrtle Alley as a uNo Parkingll area. (Resolution No. 8144) 9 Stillwater City Council M1nutes Recessed Meeting I September 5, 1989 . Ayes - Councilmembers Bod ovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 4. Stillwater Area Econo land in Industrial Pk Motion by Councilmember 0 request of the Stillwater the Industrial Pk. for in Park Plan Committee. (Al ic Development Corp. request to City to preserve for industrial purposes. heim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to refer the Area Economic Development Corp to preserve land in ustrial purposes to the West Stillwater Business in favor). 5. Approval of Change Or er No.2 for L.I.251 - Forest Hills/TH 36 Frontage Rd. Moti~by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve Change Order No.2 for L.I. 251. (All in favor). 6. Petition requesting "Dead End" signage at corner of School St. & Third St. Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember BodloV1C to approve investigation of the "Dead End" signage problems at the corner of School St. and 3rd St. (All in favor). CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilmember the Consent Agenda of Se favor ). 1. Directing Payment Ayes - Councilmembers Nays - None seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve 5, 1989 including the following: (All in (Resolution No. 8135). Farrell, Kimb~e, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. I. 2. Contractorsf License Chaves & Sons 15975 Putnam Blvd. Afton, Mn. 55001 Excavators Renewal Dolphin Pool & Patio, In . 3405 Highway 169 No. Plymouth, Mn. 55441 Excavators New Figg Masonry 1726 Edgerton St. Maplewood, Mn. 55117 Masonry & Brick Work Renewa 1 Gorham-Oien Mechanical, Inc. 841 Forest Ave. Mora, Mn. 55051 Fire Protection New 10 . . Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 Junker Landscaping 8756 Summer Wind Circle Woodbury, Mn. 55125 Moving & Wrecking Bldgs. Renewal Excavators Landscapers Austin P. Keller Const.Co.,Inc. General Contractor 481 Front Ave. St. Paul, Mn. 55117 Renewal T. B. McCloud Construction General Contractor 15780 Harmony Way Apple Valley, Mn. 55124 New Morton Builders, Inc. General Contractor 11935 Highway 95 N.E. Foley, Mn. 56329 Renewa 1 Peterson Construction, Inc. Roofing & Siding 128 E. Third St. New Richmond, Wi 54017 Renewa 1 . W.T. Simonet 5976 Stagecoach Tr. No. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Sterling Fence, Inc. 147 W. 78th St. Bloomington, Mn. 55420 General Contractor New Fencing Renewa 1 Stiglich Construction, Inc. 1260 Helmo Ave. No. Oakdale, Mn. 55128 General Contractor New 3. Adoption of Resolution No. 8137 authorizing execution of a contract with Junker Recycling, Inc. Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 4. Submit claim for sewer back-up at 1309 McKusick Rd.Ln.No. to insurance agent. 5. Set Public Hearing date of Oct. 3 for review of recommendations for a Local & National Historic District. 6. Set Public Hearing date of September 19 to hear nuisance complaint regarding property located at 1014 W. Ramsey St. . 11 , Stillwater City Council M'nutes Recessed Meetiftg September 5, 1989' . 7. Set Public Hearing re ardi ngproperty e of September 19 to hear nuisance complaint ated at 410 No. Fourth St. 8. Resolutions declaring cost to be assessed & ordering preparation of proposed assessment f r L.I. 240 (Res.#8145), 250 (Res.#8146), 251 (Res.#8147J~ 253 (Res.#8148), & 255 (Res.#8149). Ayes - CouncilEmbers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 9. Resolutions setting hearing date of Sept. 26 for assessment hearing for L.I. 240 (Res..#8150), 251 (Res.#815!), and 255 (Res.#8152). Ayes - CouncilllelTlbers 80 lovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 10. Resolutions setting earing date of Sept. 27 for assessment hearing for L.I. 250 (Res.#8153) and 253 (Res.#8154). Ayes - Councilmembers Bo lovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Opheim and Mayor. Abrahamson. 12. Resolution setting h forfeiture property Ayes - Council.embers Bo Nays - None reassessment to tax . Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. STAFF REPORTS (continued Comm. Dev. Director Building Inspectors' Motion y Couftcilmember pheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve the attendance of the Bu'lding Inspectors at conferences on Nov. 13 & 14 and 16 & 17 at a cost of $10 per person. (All in favor). Assistant Planner's onference Motion y Councilmember arrell, seconded by Councilmember Opheim approving the attendance of the At st. Planner at a Planning Conference in Chicago at an approximate cos)t of $407.00. (All in favor). Building Permit Fees Discussion ollowe regarding the raising of building permit fees. Mr. Russell will analyz the fee structure and report back to Council. 12 . . . Stillwater City Council Minutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 City Engineer Discussion followed regarding the assessment of parcels in Oak Park Heights for water services included in L.I. 253. Staff was directed to ask Oak Park Heights to take care of these assessments and rebate the monies to the City of Stillwater. City Coordinator Vacancy on Port Authority Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to adopt the appropriate resolution commending Carol Paukert for her contributions to the Port Authority Commimssion. (Resolution No. 8156) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None Sewer Claim at 1309 McKusick Rd. Ln. No. Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to remove the sewer backup claim at 1309 McKusick Rd. Ln. No. from the Consent Agenda and add to the Payment of Bills Resolution for payment. (All in favor). AFSCME Contract Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Council member Kimble to authorize distribution of retroactive pay for AFSCME employees contingent on implementation of new hours on October 1, 1989. (Allin favor). COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Downtown Plan Action Committee Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to retain Bob Weiser on the Downtown Plan Action Committee and confirm previous action appointing David Pohl as a committee member. (All in favor). Erosion at Woodland Lakes Site Discussion followed regarding erosion at the Woodland Lakes site. A notice will be sent to the owners giving them ten days in which to take action or the City will take steps to have it done. Appointments to Park and Recreation Commission Discussion followed regarding appointments to the Park and Recreation Commission and formulation of a policy for making appointments. 13 I Stillwater City Council inutes Recessed Meeting September 5, 1989 . ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember arrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 P.M. (All in favor). MAYOR ATTEST: CITY C ERK . 14 . .M" ry Lou Johnson 6 North Fourth Street btillwater, Minnesota 55082 ear Mary Lou: I would greatly appreciate oefore the Stillwater City September 19, 1989. I have been retained by the Stillwater Downtown Councilt.o organize nJ promote '''raste the St. Croix: Valley". ~'{e hope it. ,.rill become z}r <3.rlfltlal eVf-?D't. It. ,\{()111d b~:: l()osel-y bZ{E:-;ecJ or1 n l\ ~['(=lst~e of "P'linrle~3()tcl u it if you could sched nle an aIclpearance Coune i1 a t the ir meeting on TU2sday, , ., Hld wOUld, hopefully, be represented by all of the St. CroLx Valley ommunities and the ir bus blesses. f..? would 1 ike to allow them to set up booths in the Park and allow the ic to sample th(~ many ,,-rares, ediblE" and non-edible, that are \vailable in the valley. e ,{ould expect. sixty to one hundred 'de,.fould 1") ["O',l ide 1 under the a usnices ,yeher D,-:;")"t i ",ont CfO~rer!"'>nc"'''~- ;:\g""nC~"l' ee- -,- -'.1.. "-....." _.........l.~.'-.... _'_ .-1 V ,.t-I.. ........;........ ......... _...... ....J, hook ups for the (~xhibitors as 11el1 as toilets, security and clean up. e ,-[auld like t.o run "Tast.e the St.. Croix Valley" on the \veekend ()f Oct()b(~r 1{~ and 15, 1989. I am sur,,:; t.hal: the (;ounc i1 members "\.r ill "\-rant to bt~ informed in depth ..'" to the particulac;:s of the event and we ,vould be avaiable to answer _y ques-tions for the~ at the meetin?" on Tue,sday nig~t.. . .i.r you h2<,;"e any questlons please concact mE.: at 927-6b29 or Jlm Williams t: The FrE:iqht House, 439- 5718, I loo}\: fon-lard to seeing and meeting everYODE involved. exhibitors to take booth space. of .the Health Department and all the necessary electrical ~:)ery ~1~~.u1Y.1.-XS?urs, ( I. .' /I/~t/i /1U:::~f l- {~/t/~l.?1~{~Z-/ / / Jlm 'datson 1/ Consul ting Partners '- 4337 Hac;.;;:ey AVE.~nUf! Edina, Minnesota 55424 . . . . ~;L~~~ lbuth Service Bureau 101 West Pine Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 (612)439-8800 September 5, 1989 The Honorable Wally Abrahamson, Mayor Stillwater City Council City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mayor Abrahamson and Council Members: As we begin our second decade of serving youth and families in the St. Croix Valley we can look back with pride on our development and the help we have provided hundreds of young people over the years. Looking to the future we are equally proud that the communities we serve provide the essential support needed to carryon our work with youth at risk. In the coming year we are asking that the City of Stillwater contribute $21,491 of the $66,535.00 we hope to raise from the municipalities in our area. These requests are again based on population as the enclosed formula outlines. I would be pleased to appear before the City Council to discuss our request in more detail. Thank you - your continued support makes our services available and affordable for all residents of Stillwater. cc: Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator Enclosure . ST. CROIX VALLEY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU 1990 Municipal Funding Requests --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ of yout.h served % of total population contribution -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Afton 5.0 6.4 Bay po r t 11. 0 4.7 Bayto~in Township 2.5 2. 1 Grant To~:nshjp 11.2 8.2 Lake Elmo 12.6 111.4 Lake Ian c1 6.6 4. 9 Lakeland Shores .5 .5 Lake St. Croix Be a c h 2.3 2.9 Parine on St. Croix 1.7 1 . 11 May TCHlnsh i p 2.8 5.5 Oak Park Heights 8.9 8. 1 St. t1a r y , s Po i n t 1.1 .9 St.illwater 34.8 32.3 S till ~: ate r To~mship 11.7 4.3 VJest Lakeland TOlrinship 2.3 3.4 Other 6.0 :3 . 11 Total: 100.0 100.0 $ 1/,258 3,128 1 ,397 5, 1156 9,581 3,260 332 1,930 931 :3,659 5,390 599 21,1l91 2,R60 2,263 66,535 . . . . . . THE PARLAY GROUP, INC. P.O. Box 441 Stillwater,' Minnesota 55082 September 14, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mayor and Councilpersons: Please consider this letter as the request to the City Council, of The Parlay Group, Inc., for a permit to begin construction of a model house in the Forest Ridge Addition. The model is to be constructed on Lots 15 and 16. It appears the installation of the City improvements are moving forward. I would like to begin construction of the model house so that it1s completion would occur at approximately the same time as the streets are completed. Thank you. Very truly yours, THE PARLAY GROUP, INC. V~L --( '1,-- --- J~ard c.~t II RCEII/ml Hand Delivered . . . ST~FF REQUEST ITEM OEPARTMENT Fire Department ~~_____ M~:;TING OATE ~:::-89 -.......--- OESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Sriefly outline what the ~equest is) ~ Request permission to purchase, 1500 ft. of 2~" hose and 300 ft. 1~" hose. ----------... ...... ____........ 4_ T __ ..... __~ --_______.....___ tI._ . ..4________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------_________.1 ':"" ---------------------- ------------------------------- FINANC!AL IMPACT (Briefly outline a.ss'~c:ia.ted with this M!ques~ and needed to fund the request) Budgeted for in Capital outlay $3520.00 ..... the costs, if any, tMat are the pl"'Op.~sed s'~'.trce .:)f the ".Lnds --------- ---- AOOITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACYE:D YES _ NO ~ ALL COUNCIL REQUEST I~S MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING COUNCI.L MEE:TING IN OR . TO MUla! Be: SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK ~ DAYS PRIOR TO THe: Ne:XT Re:~ULARLY SC~e:n~ IN THe: COUNCIL MATe:~IAL PACKET. SUBMITTED BY DATE 09-15-89 IC" . . . ST~FF REQUEST ITEM Oe:P~RTMe:NT Fire Department ~_______ ME~TING DATE ~~:89 ----- Oe:SC~!PT!ON OF REQUEST (Sriefly outline what the request is) Request permission to purchase 2 radios from Capitol City Communications. _ ...... UoI.-""'_"'_'" _ ___Radios,. E~ _be ins!.~lled in new tanker and r~scue trucks whjch are now being manufactured at Custom in Osceola. -------- -.- .--...... --.--- --------------------------------------------------------------------- w_______________________________~______ __ _ h.. . -...-......- --..... .............. ------------------------------------ ----------------------- . F!N~NC!AL IMP~CT CBriefly outline associated with this reques~ and needed to fund the request) Donation fund-approx. cost $2600.00 the costs, if any, ~~a~ are the propl~sed s.~I.Lrce ,~f the F'.I.nds ___________ r --.;r..'V".......1._~_ -_____..- .- . .. ....___ .L II.,. ......__ AOOITIONA~ INFORMATION ~TTACHED YES_ NC~ ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST SE SUBM!TTED TO THE CITY CLS:RK ~ MINIMUM OF F!VE WORKING DAYS-PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHe:D~:n COUNClL MEETING~IN OR ER. TO BE PLAC~D !N THE COUNC!~ MATER!A~ PACKET. SUBMITTED BY ~~ ~~ CATE 09-15-89 - - . . . STAFF REQUEST ITEM DEPARTMENT Fire ------------ _____________ M~ETING DATE ~~~~12~JJ~2___ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (B~iefly outline what the ~equest is) ____12a.'L~_l;.....&!j.~11Q.\i.~_~~~f.u.1.1Y_~g,~ng,_lU_~_.2.:i:.Ji.J!!Qlll.1l...I?.E29.~tj.E!le..Q_____ period. I recommend his promotion to permanent Firefighter Engineer -------------------- ----------------------------- effective Sept. 15, 1989. -------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------~------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------- ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------~ --_._-------~ ......- ---------------------------------------- F!NANC!AL !MPACT (B~iefly outline ass,~ciated with this reql.Lest and needed to fund the request) the costs, if any, tha~ are the p~opljsed s.jl.l~ce .jf the f'J.1"'lds __________________~~~_J -------------- --- ---------- -----------------------------------------------------~--------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- _____________________________________v _____________________________ ----------------.... -. ~------------------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED YES NO ~ ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS-PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCI.L MEETING IN,r;tER)J BE Z THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. SUBMITTED BY 4~- ___ DATE ~~~ 15, 1989 ~ . DAVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR POLICE CHIEF f) THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA GORDON SEIM FIRE CHIEF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF FIRE TO: Mayor, City Council Members, City Coordinator and City Attorney. FR: Gordon Seim. Fire Chief DA: 9-15-89 RE: S & A Landclearing Burning Permit On September representing Hwy 36 and permit was strickley at 6th, 1989 a burning permit was issued to Steve ~adowski, S & A Landclearing. This permit was issued for an area Greeley Street known as the Forest Ridge Addition. This given for the purpose of land clearing and development this site. . I recieved various complaints from citizens that S & A Landclearing was hauling in trees, brush and other material from other areas. I investigated and found that these complaints were based on fact. I personally observed an S & A Landclearing truck full of green brush and trees at this site the day after the initial burn was started. I questioned the driver and he informed me that they had been hauling into this site from other areas. I than told him that S & A had violated the conditions of the permit and to remove his truck from this area and to notify S & A Landclearing representive Steve Sadowski of this and to report to the fire station to discuss this matter. At about the same time one of our part-paid firefighters was on his way to work at North Town and observed an S & A truck loading at Mounds View Minnesota with the same type of material. We assume this is were it was coming from. The permit at this time was cancelled and no more burning allowed. The green trees and brush added much more soot than normnal to this burning situation. It also inconvienced some home owners much more than they should have been. My recommendation to the Stillwater City Council is to fine S & A Landclearing in connection with this (if possible) . . Form 2091 Disi\ sn",-, 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Police Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336 I=lra Phnnao ~1')_A.~a_~1.,n . illwater "~ - - ~ T: E B I R T H P LAC E 0 F .M INN E SOT A ~ APPLICATION TO CONSUME Applicant Information Name of Ot'g an i zat i orl______f~~~_Jl~1:ttt_-------------------------------- App 1 i carlt Name (Fu 11) ____[-"d-~.t!:_(1:..aJ!l.~~___________________________________ St t'eet Addt.ess_llf..-1'I...._i~/3:.M.A________________ B i t't h Dat e____________ City_~~~~~~~___________ State__~~~A____________ Zip__2i[~~______ H,:,me Ph orle _~!9.:..Elit!..________ Work Phone________________ Facility Information Pad". ot' faci 1 i ty to be ,_tsed______e~~~..P....a.:::!:__~_________ Date to be used___~~~:~~~_____ Time to be used___(~~~_~1LJ1!~_____ . Nunibet. of pet'sons expected___J~______.__________________ Purp.:)se (soft ball game, wedd i ng, etc.) ________..P.!:!?:~_________________ Type of activity(fund raiser, dancing, music, etc. ) Check Appropriate Information _~J0'!!___Beer to Corlsume ________Liquor to Consume Beer to Sell & Consume ________Liquor to Sell & Consume ________Wine to Consume ________Wine to Sell & Consume Security Information(Intet'rlal Use DrIly) P.:)l ice Officet' Requit'ed by City? _______yes. _~~~~__NCI. Officer Rate of Pay $ . Mail License To: (If different than applicant) .---------------------------------------------- CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 . illYYater ~ -- ~ T: E B I R T H PL ACE 0 F .M INN E S''o TA l APPLICATION TO CONSUME Applicant Information '. .Name cof i:.t'gani zat iO:jrl_~__..:..__!~~~€:..'L~!!:.e.~~_L~!-.!L___..:.._________________;... Aoo 1 i cant. Name e F'.lll) __rsf2.~€:-~.t_!i~t::..~e.!1___________________________________ Stt'eet Addt'ess_~_i~L~E~~Pl~______________ Birth Date____________ City~_~~~~~~~__________ State___~~~~___________ Zip_~~~~3______~ H,:.ine' Ph,:.ne________________ . W.:>rk .Pho::>ne________________ "'. Faci 1 i ty Informat ioy, Pat'k or' facil ity to:. be '.lsed~_J3.._f:gM!!::!!:.._P..9-~E:---~---------- Date to be used__S~.t~~~~~J~ji Time t c, be '.lsed__n.f2~!:!::..4..;...Q..Q___________ . NI.lrri ber .:>f' P~t'SI:>Y1S ex Pe=ct ed_____L<L___~.~______~~__..:_~____ . . - . . . Pl..lrpl~se (sqft ball. game, wedd ing, etc.) ___'--P_,i&!!&~________________:....____ . , -. . . '. "Type of ~ctivity(fl..lnd raiser, dancing, m'.tsic, et c. ) -----~~----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Check Appropriate Informat'ion _;..:.;acxxxu..Beer' to C':OYlsui"r'-e ________Liquor to Consume ________Beer to Sell & Consume ________Liquor to Sell & Consl..lme Wine C,:,nS(lme ..... - '" I_I Wine t .:. Se 1 1 & Ceons '.lme Sec'.lrity Informat ion (Intet'rlal Use 'Orlly) Police Officer Requit'ed by City?_______yes._~~~J0'__NI:,. Officer Rate of Pay $ Mail LicenSe To: (If different than applicant) --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 .. iIlvYater ~ - - ~ .--... -- -\~ T ~ E B I R T H P LAC E 0 F .M INN E S ''0 T A J APPLICATION TO CONSUME Applicant Information _ N~me _ of '::.rganizat i;:'YI~___~~_~_::.tJ_~~~r:~!:.~_______________,....----------- Applicant NaMe(Full) M44. .!.eoYUJ/t,d $cMade Stt'eet Addt'ess_"!!'!"~__~_Q~~~_~~L_~___________ Bi rth Date____________ City~~~~i~~~~L3j~~~______ Hi:.me' Ph b"ne .:._:!.~~-!!!.~'!.._______ State Minn. Zip __--'!~~~______ Work .Phone________________ " Facility Information Pat'l-<. C,t' faci i i ty t,:, be '-lsed_~__-P...4.04~fJ44.k..----_:_-------- . Date to be used_D.ef.-..u.-,._J-~---_ Time to be'-lsed____tf...-:1-MI5:.___________ Nun; be-t~ .:) fpet's.:)ns e){ pect ed ______lQ_;..._'_..:___--~;...________,.... .' Pl_lrp,:.se (s.:)ft ball -gal\l.e, wedd i ng, etc. >. ___'-P-.~M~___________________:___ 'Type ofa.ctivity.(fund raiset', da.Y',cin9, music, et c. ) -----~~----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Check Appropriate Information XXXXXX ________Be~rto Consu~~ _______~Liquor to Consume Beer to Sell & Consume __:______Liquor to Sell & Consume Wi ne t.:, COnSI.lrlle Wine to Sell & Consume Security Information(Intet'Y',al Use 'Orlly) pi:,l ice Officer Requit'ed by City? _______Yes. .JrX...XXXK_N.:,. Officer Rate of Pay $ ~ Mail LicenSe To: (If different than applicant) . ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 ~ ~AVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR iIlwater ~ - ~ THE IIIlTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA i) EMERGENCY TELEPHONE: 911 STILLWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: Chief Mawhorter fl, FROM: Sgt. Beberg ~~ SUBJECT: Bus Inspection DATE: I 090889 Per your instructions, I did a preliminary safety check of a bus that Rivertown Taxi is operating. It is OK, safety wise. They are operating the bus on a contract basis. As such, they do not need meters. As of this date, all the bus is being used for is trans- porting factory personnel from their homes to the Andersen Corporation and back home at the end of their shift. I will re-inspect the bus when they have the few minor problems fixed. The insurance for the bus is wi~h the same company that has the Taxis. (They re- cently changed insurance companies and do NOT have the insurance binder for the City in their possession. They dropped their insurance with the company we currently have the insurance binder from, so there will be a notice of canellation coming from them). See ~~~nu~~:e~~ g::s e~;l:f~o~h~i~~t~:C c~~:~c1c '.rIN RUfftBcr. I ,dll gct that later from c~) . 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone: 612439-1314 or 612-439-1336 STILLWA~ER POLIC~ DEPARTMENT CAB INSPECTION ~8~_~Q~Ea~V ADDRESS 823 South 4th Street NAME Rivertown Taxi- STATE Mn. PHONE # 430-0464 CITY ___~~!1~~~e3_____ ~8~_.!~EQ.8t!8IIQ~ VEH. MODEL CBW VEH. STYLE Transit Bus VEH. MAKE __~~ry~~~~~_ ICENSE # _~~~] _~~2 VEH. YEAR _~2~~ VEH. VEH. VIN # _~~~~2E~~~!2~~____ VEH. COLOR/S ___~2!~____ STILLWATER CAB LICENS LIGHTS FRONT Headlights low heal Headlights high bea.' Turn signals Parking lights LIGHTS REAR Reds with headlights Brake lights Turn signals Backup lights TI RES L.F. X BRAKES Reg'll ar HORN X ~A~_.!~~E~~I1.Q~ COMMENTS L.F. X R.F. X L.F. X R.F. X L.F. R.F. X L.F. X R.F. X L. R. X R. R. X Lower left is out L. R. X R. R. X LR. X R. R. X Do not work R.F. X R.R. X L. R. Rear tires are duals, outside L.R. . bad. ~s X Eserg ncy X WINDOW GLASS Condition Cleanliness X Rear door glass and right side window ------- need to be replaced. X Operation Left is OK, right does not work. WINDSHIELD WIPERS Condition RATE CARD N/A METER LIGHT Bus capacity - 27 passenge s Front and rear door operat'on - OK 5 Emergency window exits - OK 1 Roof emergency exit - OK Mileage 91,258.2 Date - 090889 N/A RY._INSPECTED~ . .,- TO BE t . . . , ...... CITY OF STILLWATER 216 No. Fourth St. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 NOTICE OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday , the 19th day of September , 1989, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the Council Chambers, located in the City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, City of Stillwater, the City Council of the City of Stillwater will conduct a public hearing to determine whether abatement action should be taken by the City for failure of the owners of the property, Grover J. Simms and Donna Simms, to take remedial action as required by the Notice of Intent to Abate Nuisance dated June 27, 1989, a copy of which is attached to this notice. The real estate involved is at 410 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, and is legally described as follows: That part of Block 13-of the Original Town, (now City) of Stillwater, according to the corrected plat thereof, described as follows: beginning at a point 63 feet north of the southeast corner thereof, thence north 62 feet, thence west 200 feet, thence south 125 feet to the north line of Linden Street, thence east along the north line of Linden Street, thence north 63 feet, thence east 175 feet to the point of beginning. If the nuisance is abated by the City, costs associated with the action will be spread against the property as a service charge and certified to the County Auditor for collection with the real estate taxes. This Notice is given pursuant to ~ 38.10 of the Stillwater City Code. The grounds for this proposed action is that upon this real estate, there exists a substantial nuisance and hazard to the public. All persons desiring to be heard at this hearing should attend. Dated this 5th September , 1989. day of ~ e " , . DAVID MAWHORTER PUBUC SAFETY OIREcroA POLICE CHIEF THE BIRTHPUC! OF MINNEscrA GORDON SEJM FIRE CHIEF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF POLICE NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABATE A NUISANCE TO: ____~~~~j_l~~~____________________ ____~ __________________ ____~~~~~A~~~MNL___il~_____________ DATE: 06 -27 -89 ------------- You are listed as the~OWNER __ RESPONSIBLE PARTY of the p~ope~ty locate~ at ____ ~______________________, in the City:of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. . I The property is legally described as: Jl.,~.J,J",,_~~_Q.~..9.Q!1t!E.1l..91~Q)..!_~s._0j'_h[!..~Q~!iE_lk_![E_N..f]_liL.s..t~..J~.tmlt~~_~-1QQ.~_ _Jl~~Q..~.a..._l.~~_lQ.j.l!!M.li.~ILL_Tli!~Q.~JU_l2.~ll!!~Q..E...!.t._~:t'_I!!EJl.f!_!!.._1].2~_j:.9_____ BEGINNING EXCEPr TO C SCHAFFER. ___________________L__________________________________________________ The property has a plat parcel number of: ___1~~~:21t~________________ . An inspection of your property was Made on __Q~~_~i_____ _______ by the Enforcement Officer for the City of Stillwater Department of Public Safety. As a result of this inspection, your property has been found to be in violation of the City of Stillwater City Code ~3a.Ol, Nusiances, for the following reason(s): PART OF THE RETAINING WALL ON FOURTH ST. HAS FALLEN DCMN AND THE BANK BEHIND IT --HiS-sl:ffi-D'QWN-ANb-IS-OVERGROWifW-IfHWEEDS-ANDGRAsS-CoVERlifTiiE-MAjoim-oFTiiE- -WIDTHOP-TiiE-sIUEWALK:-THESTAIRS-WDING"-tiP-nrE1TEEPBANK-ffRoi1-fOURTH-ft-:-iRE- --. BREAKIiG-APARTW'iTH-Mffi-OF THE sfEiSAN"nloi""fiSERS-N'O-wroEifTOTALLyIiifACT:THE --ENfffi-YARDIS-oVEiRiiNwnH-GRASsAND~WEiDS-TifEMAJORffi-orwHlcifISAMi:"NiMUM- ______________w__ ___________________~_______________________________ OF WAIST HIGH WITH SOME EXTENDING TO THE CHEST OF THIS OFFICER. IN THE BACKYARD =1~:~C~1~L~:!:f~IEff1>!_~~"ill:-!f~Q[:s~5~lg:@:!g{E:~q}:~~1gf IE.::: MISSING NUMEROUS GLASS WINDOWS IN THE OVERHEAD DOOR IS LOADED WITH SPARE ENGINE --PARTS-AND-AVARfETY-BF~HERSCiA-p~AL:--------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------~-----~-------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------~---------------------------~-------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------~-------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- _________________"'<V""'W't"'<V'"""________..______ ------------~----~~----~-~----- - ~---------------~-~------------~-- --------------------------------------------------------- A'IV...___________ . . . -----------......-------...... -------- (Ov.r) ....... nt. 0.. ~1W-1 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Potlca Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336 Fire Phone: 612.4:J9.6120 ." <; " . You ~re hereby advised th.t you must take the following steps to ~b~t. the nui5ance(s) listed in this notice by no later than the. following date; ( JULY 31 1989 . ------------~----------------- STEPS TO BE TAKEN: 1.) THE LAWN WILL BE CUT AND THEREAFtER MAINTAINED CUT SO AS TO ELIMINATE THE ----IIEVELoPEMENTOP-oR-?PREAD'fti;-oi-NbxlousmIIs--NouTER-t'iiAN-07=r4":89:------- ::~l:~~~~~~~D~~~~f;!~~~;~~~~~I!-~~~;I~~~=!g~:: -----ucrEi-fHAN-of=i4~89;------------------------------------------------ --3-:1-fmrcoN"c-RETE-STEpg-SHAIL-1fEREPA":wj}-KNifMA:INrAINEDTHERfA1'TER-:'KfLrm-l'mr- -----of-21~89;--------------------------------------------------------- --4-:)-fHE-CONcRETERETAINfN(rWALL-SHKLCBE-RE-P'lIREDA1ID-nm-PUB1:.l:c-s:r~'"HAlmnNED -----UNcmsf.RucTED-FOR-THE~L-WiDTH~~-LAfER-~07~3r~9:------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- . . . ----------------------------------~~~--~--~-~----------_._-~~~~~----- --~~ . _.. .~ 4 . _~ _____________..,;__..;,;:;,.:' -- ~~. -- .- :-_~::..-:.~----:.-:.:---:...:..::..-:....;,_-_-_ --.. - .::_...._~.::._..:. -_..~ .~.:.:...- - ,....--.-.... --... --------------------------------~------------------------------------- -----------------------------------~---------------------------------- ----.------------------------------------------------------------------ -----~---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- ~--~------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ( . ----------------------------------------------------~---- ------------------------------------------------------~------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You are further advised that you have the right to appeal this order and notice to the City Council. If you wish to do 50, you must file a written request with the city clerk no later than ___]~11~~______. IF YOU FAIL TO TAKE ORDERED REMEDIAL ACTION AND/OR FAIL TO AP~EAL THIS NOTICE AND ORDER TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY ___.Ol=ll~2___________, THE CITY WILL ORDER THE NUISANCECS) ABATED AND CHARGE ALL COSTS INCURRED THEREIN AGAINST THE REAL ESTATE AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED IN THE S~ME MANNER AS PROPERTY TAXES. YOU ARE ALSO ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO ABATE A NUISANCE ON YOUR PART MAY RESULT IN MISDEMEANOR CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST YOU. By Order of - - / _ g;~d'- .partment o~~r~f.ty David Mawhorter Public Safaty Director .NUS_Ol. -- -- -- -~- /~/7o'1 ~f/b ~"," /'" , l ( -, I/f/// , t.-;'(f o}!alft' / Ltf7'yCp/ tvr:i:A c# -Ii < t:o ;r~'v / . /,,;V ~,1 ii,,_ )!IYfiV;' & _ 1J:t;; lcftf'kW_.~ p(/y (rlL f, - /()/'J / /.' (pl.-pl / ) ~h #7<< ,y<I pJh , J-~' 9~ 0/ 8~' . ;p'l '1 aiVr, ~ I '?-:k.:a-. ~~~. r h'-I~! / ,) ., ( /v,/vV"J17 v, f/t,'l ' r /Jut-V / J . tv 7() 0 / ~ jJ v v ,u .; /c~ jf t7 0 . .' t</.lJJiP' ;;L/vt ../J 'lh 0 ~'-i .~ tiC.... -,~/ ,,'- 'l /71.1 (f'{ I ~ /'(/ ,1' /0 vi!" J12"<//lf ~ t (~. /j{l-l/'-" I .' l. f i /V.. " {' /~ V'/'i-'Z- '>- /.~ aij~~r. 1 ~ /~.0 J ;/;Y If'. _ . -Ii, c:tJ fd / / I f0rJ W". v" j~J.l It//v-t~/'/JI /, L./V rJ!1 /J d A.Cy ~/1 /[,A/~'~ Ii. i/l V v~ / f, /l 1/" ,t~ / I~. , Vf ,J .;1 vv r ),,&f; ~ / 1fi- ' t1/.f / / 1M 1.', ;d-6 '/<fD .'., /1,1) /J t/ I /I..t I . .~-- ~~.A, '. A ,1/ V /(jl/ - ,{/ // } 'v / /i / /] 0/\ ,,-,J. If/Jd.JUP. ._ j . / '-ltfH ;/1/1.-.. ~. -I;;irui.V/ {;4~~ (;; 9 . / v1~ ./ [/I {l 1J /v't /~/" ---I-- .'- oU , /!u--VI' {/ J , ;tttfW,!J ;',,~ t1JJ;;r /~ d pq J .' //n J'/{L ~1,>>.,/ I, (f ,/J~v " ~- if' ,,(, t '\ -r:/t, d, . If /(J0tt' /! /1}/a r ~v"- '. if ex UJJJ f)'/O V I J 'Ft.1J J;;iJ J! I~ /U r .' ;Cu rJ~ 1;(11 /V?v . L A ,- \ ./ fJ ./)J-c} ..' '_1/ . /l I+e -I ~J ftJ. ....cJ 1 tff, f? ./ 'iY"AY .. -1?t<./4 ('If''''' I ~/; / - .' f!I ;; '{,/ , .~/ J ., /V /udr.1y. /U ,r[.J tY;~"v~)f~. "JJl/pJ. e ~ ' f/Wv#P j;~0J. f ~ .,' #; .:/,/1 Vl/~ ~7 /If,. ,.:f;Y cj/f;} ,// . . . . _ __t=..:;: ;' -' v '" CITY OF STILLWATER 216 No. Fourth St. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 NOTICE OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday , the 19th day of September , 1989, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the Council Chambers, located in the City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, City of Stillwater, the City Council of the City of Stillwater will conduct a public hearing to determine whether abatement action should be taken by the City for failure of the owner of the property, John L. Person, to take remedial action set forth in the Notice of Intent to Abate Nuisance dated May 11 , 1989, a copy of which is attached to this notice. The real estate involved is at Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, and is legally described as follows: Lots 12 and 14, Block 11, Greeley and Slaughters Addition, Washington County, Minnesota. If the nuisance is abated by the City, the costs of the action and the expenses incurred by the City will be spread against the property as a service charge and certified to the County Auditor for collection with the real estate taxes. This Notice is given pursuant to S 38.10 of the Stillwater City Code.. The grounds for this proposed action is that upo~ this real estate, there exists a substantial nuisance and hazard to the public. All persons desiring to be heard at this hearing should attend. Dated this 5th September , 1989. day of ~u Johnson, C., -- ..---- (/ . ~ . e DAVID MAWHORTER PUBUC SAFETY OIREcroR POLICE CHIEF THE BIRTHPUCE OF MINNESOTA GORDON SElM FIRE CHIEF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF POLICE . NOTICE OF INTENT TO ABATE A NUISANCE TO: JOHN L. PERSON ------------------------------------- ____ ~~~__________________ ____~'tlj.J..E!u:~~_I:W___ 5,'5Q.B2____________ DATE: 05-11-89 ------------- You are listed as the~ OWNER __ RESPONSIBLE PARTY or the property locate~ at __~_~L~~I4___________~___________, in the City or --.Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. , - The property is legally described as: ---~-l~-~.Q-l't.....]bQ.~J1..A._<i.~l';I&.~.MiILtY..r..miT..$jQ~Q.UIQIL___ J ... ____________ --------------~----------------------------------------------------~-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The property has a plat parcel number of: ~Qt~~_~~_~~~~aQ________ . An inspection or your property was made on ___~~Z=~_______________ by the Enforcement O'f'ficer for the City of Stillwater Department of Public Safety. As a result or this inspection, your property has been round to be in violation of the City of Stillwater City Code ~38.01, Nusiances, for the following reason(s): 2~Q.~~_Q.t.~~ltl~!~a..J.l~Jt. F~Z-~l~_m~~UY:.Ql[~~lQti;.~_f1u:.s_2!J'.w: ~~~~J~~!!~_~~!!:~ll<Lt1.!_l!\E yA!\~..Mm~.J!1!_~.u:R9E1_~_~l12{.JMRs.s..~j2~~.I_ !~~.l!l_~_~g,TY21!!Ly,gQi. tJN1ROT~J]lLQ.~lLllL(HQItE_t.!!_R.O.!crLt:t1>j:..xMJU..QWL_ E2~~I.-N!~t.f~~_Cl1~~_w..A1!!_~1~~.nlf~.Q1I&.Cl.'U~!LQE..~1R_m.ii~_~_AlIt.UA&~- !!!~~.2!!...:'io..Rl!!_tI.pLQ.t.1QI_tu~!!':Qi.Q_DQ!1tl_!I~RgiIa.~~l';g,~lLa,(...~l,l~Q..~~..I1W) ; E2h~.9.!!Q.ti..9!_2.c..~_~!RJ!!.T.li.~.,gR_~j.~_Cl.Q..IJ&~lLQUj..Q~Q.&...QI.L.;:-- ~2~~.9~~Q.ti. OF -~!!1.-!.MM:h.At.P1~]~.i.~Oj.y;g,tiolLQl._G!l~LO.l_ftt_\Sj]RL~jL~ - ~2~~.9.!!.Q.t!..9!_Q.~1.!![!l2.1!II.EJtI.M..i._@lJ~E PART~~UlR~Ih...Ym:.:t..~~!m.l2.J>>DtW1C!s.cREEN PORCH C4')) FRAMING ONLY. . -------------------~-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------~---------------------------------------------------- -------------------------~--------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------~-------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------~-___________________________________~r ... _____ I ------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------_~________ r ----------------------- . -------------------------------~ ~ ----------------------- ~~------~---------------------- (Ov.r) ~",.,.. .:'~, ~... ST\~, 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Police Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336 Fire Phone: 612.4~C\.~,.,n v . You .re Mereby advised tMa~ you must take the following steps ~o abate the nuisance(s) listed in this notice by no later than the following date; ( _______~~-lQ=~_____~___________. STEPS TO BE TAKEN: 1.) THE RED JEEP LIC. I' FCX 842 APRIL t 84 REGISTRATION WILL BE CURRENTLY LICENSED -------------~------------~----------------------------------------. AND IN OPERATING ORDER NO LATER THAN 05.-31-89. -- ~J:!~~~:SJ~L-@:~U.l:~l~@B:({!!~t]:Q!:fo:!~~@_!t:f?I!:I[~l~[f~:~ TOTAL AMOUNT OF FIREWOOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 6 CORDS. FIREWOOD SHALL BE STORED IN ---SucHA-MANNEi-TIfAr-if-is-SiCUREfi-AND-WILLNOT-fALr.-oVER--PREFERABLY-FENCED:-fHIS -------------------------------------------------~-------------------- IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY 05-31-89. 3-:f"COMPoST-pfus-W"rI:i.-BEREMOVED-BY-Of-22:S9()R-WRITTEN-PERMISSION-BEOBTAINEn-fRoM ---THi-PUBI:ICHEALiiCDEPARTMENfAUTHORIZING-mff-EnSTENCi:------------------- -~-------------------------------------------------------------------- ~!.._1~_~!!Q.TJ:.f1!~"Ol!~_tI.:L!!_~_tR"O]!.L~!.l!=_~Il.~~~~_!!.~Q_!.~_0!_~_~NG COMPLETED ESTABLISHING A PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE AROUND THE PIT BY 05-22-89. - s-:fliL-OPEN-CONTAlNERS-W'ITifSTAGWliG-WATERSHALLBE-EMPTIEo-ANfi-iio-LONGER-S"TORifD- ---INAN-:liiAoi-POSITION:TQ~AtL(i:i""A""R.EOCCiiRRENCE;::ro:-Bi:COMPLETi1iNl-::lB;22-a9:7~ - ~~ =-- -.:'~7f'lii: oiD7uSED-:rIRES ANDSPARE AuTO-mTS:""[i'NcI:iiDiNC-usEDBAmiIEsj, AND-6LD7UsED --- ---SMALLAPPLIANCESSHALLBE-STORiO-WiTHIN-K-s'TORAGE-TYPE-auIL1>ING-ORREMOVEIrNoj"M- ---THi-PioPERTFANDDISPOSED-ABoVi-fi'iCMANNER-XccFrP1ABU-ACCORDING-fo-STATE STAtUTE. i:-rALL'-6i.D7UsED-MOfoa-oILsHALLBi-ofs-rosEo-dF-IN-AMANNER-XCCEPrABLEACCORDma-fo- ---STAXE-S:rAfurn-BY-05-2~9:--------------------------------------------- 8:rAIL-Scill-LOOERAND-C01.~TRUCTION-MATERfAi:-SHALt-BE-S'foRED-NEATLf-firTHEBACf-YARD ---AREABmYNDTIiE-iiIVACY-FENCE--NOfVISI:BLE-FiOMTHE-STREET-OR-REMoVE'D-INb-OISPbSED ---IIrAMANNER-ACCEPTABLEACCoR"M'NG-T<fsTATESTAfiiTE-;-Yifc1.1IDlOOTHE-1fOXES-OFP'LASTER . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ( . AND SHEET ROCK BY 05-31-89. -- 9;)-COMPLETIOi-dF-oIf-DiSTRrlCTION(;p-fHifScREENPoiarFRAMEwoRi<-CoC'ATEDoN-fHIf1M-sfbE ---OF-TIm-HOUSE-Bf-06~30=89~---------------------------------------------- IO:rSInINC-ofm-WST-ANDNORTlfwArCsQi-fHE-TiOUSE-BY-06.:JO-=S9.---------------- You are further advised that you have the right to appeal this orde~ and notice to the City Council. If you wish to do so, you must file a written request with tMe city clerk no later than __OJ~~~-89________. IF YOU FAIL TO TAKE ORDERED REMEDIAL ACTION AND/OR FAIL TO APPEAL THIS NOTICE AND ORDER TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY _____Q?_~l=~___________, THE CITY WILL ORDER THE NUISANCE(S) ABATED AND CHARGE ALL COSTS . INCURRED THEREIN AGAINST THE REAL ESTATE AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO BE COLLECTED IN THE SAME MANNER AS PROPERTY TAXES. YOU ARE ALSO ADVISED THAT FAILURE TO ABATE A NUISANCE ON YOUR PART MAY RESULT IN MISDEMEANOR CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST YOU. By O~der of David Mawhorter Public Safety Director . NUS 01 - - '. ~.- . . .' , . . @ . DAVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR POLIce CHI EF THe BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA GORDON SEIM FIRE CHIEF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLJC SAFETY DIVISION OF POLICE NOTICE OF POLICE INTENT TO REMOVE ABANDON VEHICLE FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY Dear: ~g~l~bs_Q~~sB UNKNOWN ~s~l~bg_bls~~gb~sB ~'TOWN ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Pyrsuant to Stillwater City Cede, Chapter 40; Abandoned Vehicles, the vehicle listing to you as __ Owner and/or __ Lienholder has been determined to be abandon within the city for the following reason(s); Vehic:le has reNined fOf" a period of .... thin ~ Ilocn Oft private pr:oerty without the consent of the person in control of such proplII'"ty 01" in an inoperable condition sa that it hu no substintial poieMial furth.,. lJSIt consistent with its l15ual functions and is not stored in an enclosed garage, . Vehic:lt has reRined on pl"ivatt pI'O!3II"ty fOl" a period of !11ft than 4& ho~ in a disabled condition and without lic:ense plates conspic:uously displayed, Vehic:lt has M!IIained on private proaerty fOf" a period of .... than 4& ho~ in a disabled condition and with lic:t!l'l5l plates llhich hmt an expiration date left than 90 days prior to the date of inspection. The abandon vehicle subject this notice is a; YEAR ~, MAKE __~~~____, MODEL ___~____, SERIAL ~____~_________, COLOR(S) __RK~__ LICENSE ~_ , STATE ~_, TAB ~ , EXP.~~~~4 The abandon vehicle is currently at the following location; ________ !~11~____~!~~~~!~~~__2i~~~___________________________ You art ~ advised tMt the Stillllittl" Po1i~ OepartlBi intends to rNCM this vehicle it ~ do not contiCt the Polic:e o.p.t~ and IIIU iIT~..ts to alIIPly with tM pI'O'Iisions of this oniiNla .ithin 15 w.... d.tys of this noiic:e. You aN Furth.,. adviHd thai you biw thtt right to i h....ing befON thtt Still..,. City eo.mc:il ~i", ~. rswal of 'fOV' Ylttic:l.. If yoq dtsi.-. a hw'illlJ. yoq IlI5i notify the city cItric within 1S ~lendar ~ of tM dUe of this noiic:e in ..iUlllJe Aftar thtt huring, it yoq dei.-. 0I'It, th. City Covnc:il will lithr affi...., I"t't8'W 01" aodi fy the proposed action by the Polic:a \lepirt8lfti. Sincerely, Y/ 1f1~~ d,,- Stillwater P01~;;;t;;~t . DAVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR By aban_vehOl Oat. _-O.s...l6.:89..________ ~~.... :eq' ::MM sr.., 2'12 North Fourth Street. Stillwater. Minnesota 55082 Police Phone: 612.439-1314 or 612.439-1336 Fire Phone: 612.439.6120 . ,fI " . ....... ..., ",~'.'~"'/":- ", - ~ .......,.... ... _.' , . _ -A . . \ - MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 INCLUDING MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1, (Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered site Redevelopment District) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.2, (Nelle Project) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.3, (Arkell Project) . AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 (Woodland Lake Project) AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 (BRICK POND PROJECT) OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA September 19, 1989 1 ~r~ ':;::'l:~'~i;.4 f':~ f T ~L/: ,I ., EXHIBIT A . N TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF STILLWATER COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ~ '~, '-. ;~;~;.~,:~~~~~~~J~~B;';::~~X\~. ~ ..'....h. I. " -.' - ".-'L:,_:~~~,~:~'~;:~-~-:~-"'<'~f r., .:'1 . I . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council (the "Council") of the city of St'llwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, September 19, 1989, at approximately 1. :0-0 p.m. at City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota, relating to the proposed modiftcation of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Developm nt Program") and the proposed modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating to Tax Increment Financing District No. I, located therein (the "Modified Tax Increment Financing lans"), pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, ections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, to reflect an enlargement of Tax Increment Financing istrict No. 1. It is proposed that the following property b included within Tax Increment Financing District No.1: PIN 10691-6080 10691-3540 10691-3560 10691-3590 10691-3620 10 6 9 1- 3 650 10 6 9 3 - 2 IV 0 Fee Owner State of Minnesota stillwater Housing Association. stillwater Housing Association stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association stillwater Housing Association city of stillwater Further information regarding the identification of the above parcels may be obtain d from the office of the city Clerk. A copy of the velopment Program and the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan will be on file and available for public inspection at the of ice of the City Clerk at City Hall no later than August 24, 1989. / All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing. Dated: August 15, 1989. Publish August 31, 1 89 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL ~~~e~ _...~_: .:~ . _ .", _'r- ~ - . . .'- -- .~ '~:. -:;?f:!:~~!.~~?f.t~y~~~~~;;'~{.',-, I' ~~~~~~.\ . ~~: - ':~~-~~;il~~~~~-- ~'<~im'b 1 e- - ~ - .. . -.. following resolution, the reading of which una~imous consent, and-moved its adoption: - - .. ~ ~ . - - ~ ..... . . - .. -' - ' .'. introduced the was dispensed with by RESOLUTION NO. 8127 \\ \ RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION BY THE CITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE MODIFICATION OF THE MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 LOCATED WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO 1. BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council (the "Council") of the city of Stillwater, Minnesota (the "city"), as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on Tuesday, September 19, 1989, at approximately 7:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the proposed modification of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the Jl'Development Program") and (b) the proposed modification of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 located therein (the "Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan"), pursuant to and in accordance ..With.Minneso~a Sta~utes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.17: to 469.179, 1nclus1ve, as amended, to reflect an enlargement OI Tax Increment ~inancing District No.1. Section 2. Notice of Hearing; Filing of Proqram. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be given as required by law, to distribute copies of the proposed Development Program and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan (together, the nPlans") to the Board of Commissioners of Washington County and the School Board of Independent School District No. 834, to place a copy of the Plans on file in the city Clerk's Office at city Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public no later than August 24, 1989. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Bodlov; ck , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All Present. and the following voted against the same: None ... . - . ~:.:'~'." ....:.'2'~~;. ::~;~lf:_ET~~~.;~~2~::::::\j-6.i~~.; " . . . ..< ~.. ~~~...: ~.~i'~:":>.;..:' '.: _ . .:.....':. .-., .....;;~..-.. ..... . ,_ _ _. _ . 'c'.' .. ...........: :,.~~:0L~{~~i~tlt}it~I~2It~~&1{f~~~€~c~-r:};. - - .....--- .. .": . ~ .'~~"" .:.:' .... _.::~_~_~-=:: -;:-: 7.-'.. _. -:":'='''':'':'_:, .::-..':. '.~..' .'~~ -.... :,.'~_.:..-: ;~~ .-.:?::.:'....- ....-.~ .....-.~_., _# --- '. 't:h1~}~T:~~~:i:;.E~~~~f~t;t/,~ ~~:r~~~~~i~ai:f r:~~l~i~~n oWfass~~~i:~:;r ~u~rn~::~~~ ~~d ::;J::d 1~: ...... .0.'. 1989. . " iI)~ I ahd~?td-CJL Mayor Attest: ( SEAL) 1 ) I; _.'. ....~::. .:..::", .~ :::::~:.:~:. /:.;:;... r'.:"~ .' "::--:.'::-"'..;: _._ -:.--:. ~. _. ", ~.. . .:..#-, .~...... _.__ .; . _ ','_~'- ",\4__. . '. +- : .:/~;.:~:..: :-.::':- ..... ..-:-..~::",: ;~:-~-:'.. :-:--::~~. ~". .... ..--...... .- . ;:;~~;-:~~y;~~r.4fr~l;~;::~~:.~ ".tk~~~i~l~i~~~~fu~i~y~!;~~iIfE_~{--c,:;:t~~J~;~ll~I!~~s~ ":J.,;..;- "'~;'<;;' ..... ,,~-::r.~ ,,~-".f~i~"-~;~':.~'~".;~"~':'Z.'~:~~,,--. .'0- ~ ---.--',~-=. -'.:" ;/' .:....~~~:-:.,~:...':~.:~. "" -~ '" ,,' '. \'. -:.. ',:~~-":~~'-:i:.:.~~"~f~l~'~'~'::: ...~...":.~~- ,,;i ',& I" i .. .~. ,.;; -. ~.;~;.:~.:"-~' ., .~'.- . - ~ "-::-=-:~,-'=,~;~:'~:..~- -..,--......,- :"-:":;'~ ':::~".:; '- " , ____._ _ '__~~; '=.5 ~.' .' ." .::~~ r. - MULBERRY ST. . . .' :.! \ ' ':':' .. ~"" ..Ii '.~ "1 ... .~: ,'.; "/. ~:~:,::~ :';j. .:: :.~ ~..~,: .'.: ~.: If: : .~ . . ..' .~.. ,I : ~ ~ . -. .. .:r....... '." ;:. .~:' ';;:.: ~:;. ~. . '''', :';' :: .;1 :., .' - . . MYRTLE ST. CHESTNUT ST. OLIVE S1. i: ->....: . e-.- '.-.. --, ~.., , .~. .< Ji#-':~;:'-' ~:-:'" ..:..~~ :.:.w.....:.c. ;"'.ll.: .~. >~~~ '~j;~~-~ :..-,~:~--.. ;.:..-;,";:.:.... '.-.. ._....--.--_.~.--..-_.,.-._- . ' . " . . :.':"'. "-;"'''''-:~::'''''-'~---': ":;~ ..~I-::~~~~~..:~t?~:;:~::-.. .., ~~~~1~~ '\~\ -.. . (j) ~ ..-\~ . .'.- .........~::-".,-: .. '_.:---"~:-.-' -._.....'.,..~ . -- . I 1 COMMERCIAL ST. (j) ~ m ~ (") )> ~ 0 - Z m Z :0 0 -'OJ~ .;.:..-.,..- . .;.... .... .. , :".'~: "C"r',,- .;:'!t~:':';'.O:'_. '. ." .. , 0 . I - . ~ - .. '... . . ..,;" . . ':------ .;:.:;:;',...,: .. .. ." '-... - -- ..... - . .---- _.--~. , ,-. - --~ -- ... . .~. -.. (j) ~ (f) .' ~ 1 h n'.:l l' 4.~.J~, ~:' . l'_H:' 1."'3'11"! ::..,'.....;..'...1 . .:J': ;:):. , ,..1. ;;~~,~~-:: , " ~ J ; . "'1:1 d., tl 'I; . . ,- ';'1;~ :i: . :':'-'~' ~ " '.:.; ~;!i .~ ~ \ .t..:.:.~1;lt . !.\ '~.;i;fJ!~. ~ I' " ~.(. ~.: '.' .. -~ ''''11:-1 '-,~;;. .' p~ "." "'-(."I:t~.~l 'j .~~~rt~~:';r.~~..:.. r' 11 ~~ '" ~ ~ 'b. ~ ~ ~ '1- t:> ...... "" ~ "'- ~ "1... ~ '" ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ i' ~ '1- . '" _. .__'_ . '.._., ....;J_~. .'. __:. .,":-.- ~" ~.:.._' .'-. .~~.';':~:-:";:"'.~~. ~-!:~:::>:_~:.f."": . ,1 STATUTORY REFERENCES During the ~987 Minnesota Legislative Session, the development statutes ~ere recodified into one chapter, Chapter 469 of Minnesota Statu es. The following table cross-references the previous statutory cites with the recodified cites. .' !..'. .v -... :;,;' Previous Statutory cit.e \ 4 7 2A. 0 1 472A.02 4721..03 472A.04 472A.05 472A.06 472A.09 472A.10 472A.l1 472A.12 472A.13 273.73 273.74 273.75 273.76 273.71 273.78 Chapter. 474 _ :.~.'f: .:.; Recodified cite 469.124 469.125 469.126 469.127 469.128 469.129 469.130 469.131 469.132 469.133 469.134 469.174 469.175 469.176 469.177 469.178 469.179 469.152 - 469.165 ~ ~; ~ ....;.. .-~. '. -; :~. :' .~".~ - - -... .- _.. . .. _.-.~. '.- - . .;. ,_:. ~ ..... ". -: ';.:...-:~---:.':',i -. ...-,,- ,_..' ...' ~".~ ~-'~ .~ '. '-..- -' .. " ~,.- '-' --_.... '- :'^ :.=....,.~...;. .--~.~' : ~-:'~:'~;.. -.z:_'~"':#~.;~:1 :"7r:S;!1(I-QI.:.:~\.s::);'J-3;{I ~;.::_r,:2 {).'=!--::;;:'lJ':'l~~.~':'~ :"=.'::.:;q i..sl"'!:.J2ubnI ., J. MUNICIPAL-ACTION TAKEN . . .~' ~ - -.. . ~ '-1 -", ... .~ .. Based upon 'the statutory authority described in the Modified Development-~rogram attached hereto, the pUblic purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's development obj ecti ves as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City Council has created, established and designated Development District No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.126. On February 21, 1989, the City Council modified the Modified Development Program and the tax increment financing plans for all tax increment financing districts located within Development District No. 1 to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No.1. The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: May 7, 1985: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was adopted by the City Council. . October 1, 1985: The Development Program for Develop- ment District No. 1 was modified by the city Council to modify the project area boundaries. December 12, 1985: The Development Program for Devel- opment District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to modify the project area boundaries. February 21, 1989: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No. 1 and increased project costs. June 20, District reflect increased 1989: The Development Program for Development No. 1 was modified by the City Council to an enlargement of the project area and project costs. September 19, 1989: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect a change of the parcels to be or may be acquired within Development District No.1. The following municipal action was taken with regard to the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within Development District No.1: . Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered site Redevelopment District): .. ,.... __.~ 4' _: .'... :. ect) : -:- May 7, 19851: - The Tax Increment Financing Plan for ~~~~e~~~~crf~~nc_~_ng_. . D~strict No. _,_1. wa~ c a~_oP~~d by October 1 985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increm nt Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Co ncil. Tax the December 12 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Inc ement Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. November 3 1987: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Co ncil. \ Februar for Tax Inc by the city master plan 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan ement Financing District No. 1 was modified Council to reflect the implementation of a concept within Development District No.1. June 20 1 89: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 1 was modified by the city ounci1 to reflect an enlargement of the proj ect are and increased costs. 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Inc ement Financing District No. 1 was modified by the ci t Council to reflect an enlargement of Tax Increment F'nancing District No.1. Financing District No. 2 (Nelle Project) : December 12 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was adopted by the City Council. Fehruar for Tax Inc by the cit master plan 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan ement Financing District No. 2 was modified Council to reflect the implementation of a concept within Development District No.1. June 20 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 2 was modified by the city ouncil to reflect an enlargement of the project are and increased project costs. ) Tax Increm nt Financing District No. 3 (Arkell proj- December 1 1985: The Tax Inc:tement Financing Plan for Tax In rement Financing District No. 3 was adopted by the city Council. . .} . February 21, 1989:' -:-The . Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No.1. .. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 (Woodland Lake proj ect) : \ April 1, 1986: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was adopted by the city Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No.1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. . Project): Tax Increment Financing District No'. 5' (Brick Pond June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was adopted by the City Council. ,. ," ~- : ~..'~' ':". ~........ - '!' - ." .... -. -. '.." ~... - - .-;t '_~:i ~ ':'~.1,.. < ~. :.: ,,~ .....;... :. ~.,. .... .. ',- ,";' ".-, ..... '... . - ,.. ,: -. . p' . - .~. . .. -:- TABLE OF CONTENTS." ...... '! (This Table of C ntents is not part of \he Modified Develop- ment Program and is only for convenience of reference.) Page SECTION I. KODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPM NT DISTRICT NO. 1 Definitions statement and Finding of Public Purpose Statutory Authority statement of Objectives Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data Environmental Controls Open Space to be Created Public Facilities to be Considered Proposed Reuse of Property Administration and Maintenance of Development District Rehabilitation Relocation. Boundaries of Development District . Parcels to be Acquired or May B~ Acquired in Whole or in Part within the Development District Subsection 1.15. Modification of Development Program for Development District No. 1 Subsection 1.1. Subsection 1. 2. \ . Subsectlon 1. 3. Subsection 1. 4. Subsection 1. 5. Subsection 1. 6. Subsection 1. 7. Subsection 1. 8. Subsection 1. 9. Subsection 1. 10. Subsection 1.11. Subsection 1. 12 . Subsection 1. 13 . Subsection 1. 14 . EXHIBIT I-A Bound ry Map of Development Distr ct No.1 as of December 12, 1985 SECTION II. Subsection 2.1. Subsection 2.2. Subsection 2.3. Subsection 2.4. Subsection/2.;;. Subsection 2.6.' Subsection 2.7. "' ~}...-":, ~ ~.~ '_h" TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR MENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activities Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District _ Development Acti vi ty in the Tax : Increment Financing District for . which Contracts have been signed Other Specific Development Expected "to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-5 1-11 1-11 1-11 1-12 1-14 1-14 1-15 1-15 1-17 1-18 I-A-l 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-5 2-5 , 2-6 2-6 J ,. Subsection 2.8. Estimated Cost of Project 2-7 . Subsection 2.9. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 2-7 Subsection 2.10. Sources of Revenue 2-7 Subsection 2.1L- Estimated Original Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value 2-8 Subsection 2.12. Type of Tax Increment Financing District 2-10 Subsection 2.13. Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 2-12 Subsection 2.14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 2-12 Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 2-16 EXHIBIT II-A EXHIBIT II-B EXHIBIT II-C . EXHIBIT II-D EXHIBIT II-E EXHIBIT II-F Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.1 as Adopted May 7, 1985 II-A-1 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified October I, 1985 II-B-1 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified December 12, 1985 II~C-1 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.1 as Modified November 3, 1987 II-D-1 Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No.1 as of November 3, 1987 II-E-1 Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified September 19, 1989 II-F-1 SECTION III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 Subsection 3.1. Subsection 3.2. Subsection 3.3. , Subsection 3.4. Subsection 3.5. Subsection 3.6. . '-............... ,-.. _. ,,- - , ,4__.\..._. Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activity Expected to Occur within Tax Increment Financing District No 2 Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for --.'- which Contracts have been signed 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-2 3-2 3-3 :..~ ::.i.~ '-:.' 'Jc!;. j. . ~ e:. f.1 .... ::H': :!: ~~ . ':.. ..~ . Subsection 3.7. Subsection 3.8. Subsection 3.9. Subsection 3.10. Subsection 3.11. Subsection 3.12. ~ubsection 3.13. Subsection 3.14. Subsection 3.15. EXHIBIT III-A SECTION IV. EXHIBIT III-B Subsection 4.1. Subsection 4.2. Subsection 4.3. Subsection 4.4. Subsection 4.5. Subsection 4.6. Subsection 4.7. Subsection 4.8. Subsection 4.9. Subsection 4.,10. Subsection 4.11. Subsection 4.12. Subsection 4.13. ther Specific Development Expected . 0 Occur within the Tax Increment . Financing District Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Estimated Original Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value Type of Tax Increment District Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 ..' - -,.-::.. 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-3 3-4 Financing 3-5 3-5 3-5 3-7 s of Tax Increment Financing Plan Increment Financing District s Adopted December 12, 1985 III-A-1 Map of Tax Increment Financing No. 2 as established 12, 1985 III-B-1 MENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 3 Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Estimated original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment Type of.Tax.lncrement Financing District Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-1 4-2 4-2 4-2 4-3 4-3 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-5 . Subsection 4.14. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 4-7 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 as Adopted December 12, 1985 IV-A-1 EXHIBIT 'IV-A Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 as established December 12, 1985 IV-B-1 EXHIBIT IV-B \ SECTION V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 Subsection 5.1. Subsection 5.2. Subsection 5.3. Subsection 5.4. Subsection 5.5. Subsection 5.6. . Subsection 5.7. Subsection 5.8. Subsection 5.9. Subsection 5.10. Subsection 5.11. Subsection 5.12. Subsection 5.13. Subsection 5.14. Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment Type of Tax Increment Financing District Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 5-1 5-1 5-1 5-1 5-2 5-2 5-2 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-7 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No~ 4 as Adopted April 1, 1986 V-A-1 EXHIBIT V-A Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 as established April 1, 1986 -:'~~-~4}.~':~_....~. EXHIBIT V-B . ~;~ .>- .~:) i._ . _;Jo ::.. ---'.- .,,-....;..; -. . . ,- _ '.: --. ~;:.~ "}_"L'~ , .. ": ~ ....~ :~f~(;_~~).~~a~~D~ ~~l~:~~ V-B-1 ,." -, ~ ..:....; -,-'. ~ ~. -,; ,; 0' SECTION VI. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREM NT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 Subsection 6.1. Subsection 6.2. Subsection 6.3. Subsection 6.4. Subsection 6.5. Subsection 6.6. \ Subsection 6.7. Subsection 6.8. Subsection 6.9. Subsection 6.10. Subsection 6.11. Subsection 6.12. Subsection 6.13. Subsection 6.14. EXHIBIT VI-A EXHIBIT VI-B EXHIBIT VI-C APPENDIX A Exhibit 1 , ..; -...-,.. ", L : _~ ,)-" OJ ._ ..., _......- ;......-..... .: -. F~ . '.~._: - , "". .".:..... _1... ..............- "'.;. ...,;.. ".f" - .......- . - -:' .;,,,,,,. _'... ....-.1;;;,;;.-..'--' '-.. .:_ ...t ........:,;.-.-r "But Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment Type of Tax Increment Financing District Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Modification of ~ax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 6-1 6-1 t I 6-1 6-2 6-2 6-2 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-5 y Map of Tax Increment Financing t No. 5 as established 1989 VI-A-l r" Finding ents to Original Value Administrative Guide for the Administration of the Modified Develo ment Program for Development District No. 1 Moqel Information the School Board, and the office of Audit r Form to be Submitted to Washington County Board, the Minnesota State ..:-..., ~_. ._...... .._.~ _._'__ _u..~.. .", ".",:", -.. ',.. ,- .... , ~ __'_0'_' _ _...... .._.';;" A -, - .-, -, -~.. - .... ..:. ~ - .,' ....' ..;~... .-' . :- ::.1 :: :~ 2 1: (1 :: ~ -; ~; :: '.<-; /~'\ :.~~! ' .~";: ;~~ -', .\ -, -', ,~ ".. ..:,' ~ _. ... :.:.:~ .-~ r;:: . -' .' ~.:........ ...;..- VI-B-A VI-C-A A-I l-A-l c . ~ . . .....' ".<-' "- . SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 ). -. .~ -~_.- (AS--MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Subsection 1.1. Definitions. The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Development Program, have the mean- ings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires: \ "City" means the City of Stillwater, a municipal corpo- ration and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota desig- nated as a home rule charter city. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan which contains the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "Counc i 1" means the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty, also referred to as the governing body. . "County" means the County of Washington, Minnesota. "Development District Act" means the statt~tory provi- sions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended and supplemented. IIDevelooment District" means Development District No. I in the City, which is created and established hereto pursuant to and in accordance with the Development District Act, and is geographically descr ibed in Section I, Subsection 1.13 of the Development Program. "Development Proqram" means this Development Program for Development District No.1, initially adopted by the Council on May 7, 1985, and as it has been modified. As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subdivision 3, a development program is a statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space to be created, the environmental controls to be applied, the proposed reuse of private property and the proposed operations of the nistrict after the capital improvements within the district have been completed. "Master Proiect" means that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for each Tax Increment Financing District within Development District has been modified to include the cost of the public improvements authorized in all the other Tax Increment Financing Plans for all other Tax Increment Financing Districts with the .. Development District. This has the effect of allowing tax 1-1 -:- increment generated frqm any Tax Increment Financing District-. to" . be used for the paym~rt of any public improvements author ized ',~ wi th the Development Dis tr ict. . ' .' . . .' .~,::..;!'; :~.~ "Municioal"r dustrial Develo ment Act" means the statu-" tory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165. "Municioalit " means any city, however organized, as defined in Minnesota S atutes, Section 469.125, subd. 2. \ "Pro' ect Ar e " means the graphically described in Section Development Program. Development District I, Subsection 1.13, as geo- of the "State" mean the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increme t Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment onds issued and to be issued by the City to finance the publi costs associated with. the Development Distr ict as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing PI n for the Tax Increment Financing District within the Development District. The term "Tax Increment Bonds" shall also include a obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonos. "Tax Increme t Financin District" means any tax incre- ment financing distr i t presently established or to be estab- lished in the future i the Development District. Financin Statutes, Act" means the statutory Sections 469.174 through "Tax provisions of Minnesota 469.179, inclusive. "Tax Increme t Financin Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan, and as the same shall be modified, for each Tax Increment Fi ancing District located within the Project Area. Subsection Statement and Findinq of Public Pur- pose. (AS ORI INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) It is found that there is a need for new development in the City of Stirlwa er, Minnesota,. to encourage development within areas which a e already built 'up to provide employment opportuni ties to impr ve the local tax, base and ..to improve the general. tax base of t e s ta te ._~_ . .: . ~ :,". . .;,.:.. .".j. _. ,.;:;; . The Council of. the Ci ty determines" that there is a "need for~development and r development within the corporate limits of " the City.in the Devel pment District ,to provide employment oppor-:-, tuni ties; to improve the tax,,~ase :and . ,to 'improve ..,ttl~r,general~ "~...... .'.. '^~. -.. '" ~- -. :....." "....~. -" ,.' ...:.". J 3,.- _..' --' __"_ 1-2 ,. economy of -the State. It is found that the area within the . Development District is potentially more useful and valuable than" is being realized under existing development, is less productive than is, possible und~J; this program and, therefore, is not con- tributing to the tax base to its full potential. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely through private investment in the foreseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment financing plans will afford maximum oppor- tunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of . the Development District by private enterprise. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to ,carry out its st.ated public purpose objectives. Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority. . (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City of Stillwater proposes to designate a portion of the city as a municipal development district as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 47 2A. According to Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.02, Subdivision 11, a development district is a specific area within the corporate limits of a municipality which has been so designated and separately numbered by the governing body. The City of Stillwater also plans to utilize the devel- opment finance provisions encompassed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71-78, the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, in conjunction wi th the designation of the municipal development district. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) . The City of Stillwater designated a portion of the city as a municipal development distr ict and is proposing to modify the boundary as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. According to Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.02, Subdivision 11, a development district is a specific area within the corporate. limits of'~ municipality which has been so.designated.~ndsepa-.: rately 'numbered by the governing body.....~' . "U ..".~.- - JJ . 1-3 '.t. The City of Stillwater is also utilizing and proposes to modify the develo ment finance provisions encompassed in Minnesota Statutes, S ction 273.71-78, the Minnesota Tax Incre- ment Financinq Act, i conjunction with the modification of the municipal development- - istr ict. Subsection 1 Statement of Oblectives. (AS INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City Cou cil of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, determines that it i necessary, desirable and in the public interest to establis , designate, develop, and administer a development district 'n the City of Stillwater pursuant to the prov is ions of Minneso a Statutes, Chapter 47 2A. The Ci ty of Stillwater determines that the funding of the necessary activi- ties and improvements n the development district shall be accom- plished through tax increment financing in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, S ctions 273.71-78. The Ci ty of Stillwater and the Stillwater Ci ty Council seek to achieve the following objectives through thi development plan: 2. Improv~the inancial base of the City. oyment oppor tuni ties through the creation 1. Acquire Ian or space which is vacant, unused, under used, or inappropriate y used. 3. Provide of new jobs. 4. Encourage t e renovation and expansion of existing businesses and histori structures. 5. Acquire pro erty containing structurally substandard buildings and remove s ructurally substandard buildings for which rehabilitation is not easible. 6. Eliminate b ighting influences which impede potential development. 7. Coordinate lements of the City's Central Business District Revitalization Plan with these project objectives. 8. Provide max'mum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for d~vel pment by private enterprise. (AS ODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) 9. Provide ade uate public improvements and utili ties to enhance the area for ew development. . (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) '.,",~ ..." 10. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain proper~y in the Dev~~opment District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. 11. Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City \and the surrounding area, thereby improving living stan- dards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and un- skilled labor and other human resources in the City. 12. Secure the increase of housing, commercial, and indus- trial property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School District No. 834, Washington County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. 13. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in and adjacent to the Development District, neces- sary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Develop- ment District and adjacent areas of the City. . 14. Promote the concentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessi- bility and prominence in the City. 15. Encourage local business expansion, improvements, and development, whenever possible. 16. Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings. 17. Encourage and provide maximum opportuni ty for pr ivate redevelopment of existing areas and structures which are compat- ible with the Development Program. Subsection 1.5. Est imated Public Costs and Supportive Data. The estima~ed costs of the public improvements to be made within the Development District and financed by tax increments will be derived from the tax increment financing districts within the Development District. ....,:,>"":. -' !.~. .~ ';~ ~ :::;'~~'-.-'.--,,:;;~:# :: I . :~": i . .t . -:;..' ,; . ~ .'~, ..... :"-3 '.~ .' :.:. ". ,~, v f - .. ,', ;.: ,- - --' --, . '. 1-5 -r Range (Tax Incre~ent Financing District No.1) (AS ORIGtNALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Public Improvement Utility upg ading New develop ent Park improv ments Utility ext nsions Public acce ses $1,300,000 - 1,500,000 \ Land Acquisition Park develo ment Public acce ses $300,000 - 500,000 Other Public Costs Relocation Demoli tion Planning/engineering Administration Capitalize interest Contingenc $1,500,000 - 1,700,000 * It is estimated t at approximately $60,000 to $90,000 of the $3,700,000 could be fi anced with the first phase of tax incre- ments from the restau ant. It is expected that approximately $9,000 to $13,000 of t x increments will be available for amorti- zing a bond or "pay as you go." $3,100,000* - 3,700,000 Total All phases w"ll be implemented only if there are suffi- cient tax increment r venues from new development in the dis- trict. Future phase e penditures may require future bond issues to "front-end- future hase costs. 1-6 . . ". ~ ~ (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) . Ranqe Public Improvements $1,300,000 - 1,500,000 Utility upgrading New development Park improvements utility extensions Public accesses Land Acquisition Park development Public accesses $500,000 - 750,000 Other Public Costs Relocation Demolition Planning/engineering Administration Capitalized interest Contingency $1,600,000 - 1,800,000 Total Estimate $3,400,000* - 4,050,000 * It is estimated that approximately $60,000 to $90,000 of the $3,700,000 could be financed with the first phase of tax incre~ ments from the restaurant. It is expected that approximately $9,000 to $13,000 of tax increments will be available for amorti- zing a bond or "pay as you go." If all development listed in Appendix A of Exhibit II-B as bonded projects is completed, an additional $1,360,000 could be available for project expenses. All phases will be implemented only if there are suffi- cient tax increment revenues from new development in the dis- trict. Future phase expenditures may require future bond issues to "front-end" future phase costs. 1-7 <. 7' to time able. A~, ~Of,IF_~.ED. NO~E.MBER 3, 1987} ,. The . fo~l,?wingl budget may have ~o be amended from time as prlorltles hange and as tax lncrements become avail- Land Acquisition Additional Public mprovements consisting of: s'te preparation, relocation, utility extension, utility upgradin , park \ improvements, parking improvements, planning/engineering and administration $2,500,000 3,000,000 Total of Addition 1 Public Improvements $5,500,000* * As bonds are not nticipated at this time, the above-listed public improvements w 11 be completed as tax increments are generated and availabl . FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Land Acquisition Utilities Site Preparation Landscaping Interest Reimburs ment Professional Serv ces Contingency Capitalized Inter st Bond Discount Costs of Issuance Plan SEADC City Administrati n $250,000 118,435 89,760 53,269 62,833 15,000 10,000 126,125 10,500 20,000 10,000 14,000 TOTAL $779,922* * The City will i sue bonds in the pr incipal amount not to exceed $700,000,. wit a final maturity in 2002. Based upon prevailing interest r tes at the time of issuance, the amount available for project costs shall be that amount after capital- ized interest, bond d'scount and expenses of the City have been deducted. ,~ . -" , :)": ~:. :.':: .: .....;'." :~~.,,:#' -".......-... -.,', :',;-..; '.;,":-f "-:j " r, ,\ <, "'<.-. + -' -~. -', ., (;::/'~n. 1-8. , ::.- .1. . . . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 , ...ilP (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 1985) NELLE PROJECT Land Acquisition Public Improvements/Parking Bonding/Legal/Administration Capitalized Interest (3 yrs.) \ TOTAL Ranqe* $240,000 124,500 20,000 131,500 $516,000 $ 500,000 1,922,500 185,000 892,500 $3,500,000 * It is estimated that a bond of approximately $516,000 could be issued with the first 30 unit inn expansion of the development at the "low" range. The "high" range would include a 50 unit inn expansion, a 100 unit hotel addition, 20 unit motel, an acceler- ated learning center and related public space, parlor/banquet rooms, food service/ utility and parking based upon the developer's construction plan, and would support a $3,500,000 bond. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 1985) ARKELL PROJECT Land Acquisition and Site Improvements soil corrections utilities site preparation Bonding/Legal/Administration Capitalized Interest TOTAL Estimate $ 803,000 91,000 306,000 $1,200,000 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1986) WOODLAND LAKES DEVELOPMENT Land Acquisition Site Corrections Removal/~eplacement of Topsoil Pond Construction/Controls Clearing and Grubbing Soil Testing Public Improvements Lift Station/Force Mains Sanitary Sewer Water Mains Storm Sewer Road Construction 1-9 . -.!. $814,000 226,000 55,000 39,000 20,000 92,400* 200,000 350,000 245,000 750,000 -- - Landscaping _ Electrical Po er Distribution Lighting/Traffic Controls 100,000 380,000 ~100,000 * Estimated on a 66% of total cost payable by Woodland Lakes Other Public Costs Engineering Legal Surveying Contingency 380,000 25,000 5,500 410,000 Total Estimates $4,192,500** ** The total dollar mount does not include capitalized inter- est or other bonding c sts. These costs would need to be calcu- lated as part of alar er bond issue. TAX ENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) BRICK POND PROJEC ESTIMATE Land Acquisition Park Improve~ents Green belt buffer and landscaping Utility Assessmen Reduction Adminis trati ve $ 60,000 50,000 250,000 200,000 56,000 $ 616,000* *The total dollar amou t does not include capitalized interest or other bonding costs, if any. These costs would need to be calculated as part of larger bond issue. Subsection 1 6. Environmental Controls. (AS ORI INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The proposed redevelopment projects in the Development District do not pres nt any permanent environmental problems. All municipal actions, public improvements, and private develop- ment shall be carried out in a manner that will enhance, rather than detract from the natural environment. All necessary envi- ronmental permits ~nd learances will be obtained. DIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) . .- )." .' . ~ .:. . ' ' ',. ~ , . _ ~_. _ ~ + _ .,'.. ._ _ ,0 _-< ~ ,_' - ., .. _ 0.....-' . '-: ',6> .... ~ .~, .;, -. The proposed development activities in the Development District do not prese t significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, pu lic improvements and private development shall be carried out on a manner consistent with existing envi- ronmental standards. l-lO~-i . I. . Subsection 1.7. Open Space to be Created. '" (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) In additio'n' to the provisions of Chapter 472A.02, Subdivision 6, some open space may be created for the purpose of enhancing housing development and providing circulation of pedestrian traffic, special landscaping of residential and public property, and creation of recreational facilities including parks and walkways. The open space will be aimed at the improvement of the quality of life, quality of transportation and the physical facil~ties. Subsection 1.8. Public Facilities to be Considered. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City, in carrying out its objectives shall consider the construction of the following public facilities, when finan- cially feasible, and when needed to encourage desirable private development or when considered desirable in order to promote and enhance existing development. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Revitalization within the Development District must be financially feasible, marketable and compatible with longer range City development plans. The following recommendations represent the options that satisfy the development for the Project area in the initial state while taking advantage of opportunities which are currently available. 1. Clearance and redevelopment, 2. Rehabilitation of buildings to remain, 3. ings, Relocation of buildings and the inhabitants of build- 4. Vacation of rights-of-way, 5. Dedication of new rights-of-way, 6. New construction and expansion of commercial and indus- trial buildings, 7. Land acquisition, 8. North-end development assistance, ,and 9. Installation or replacement of facili ties and utili ties. ..:: public, and private .: ". '.;~ ~ ..: -~ ...: ~:;; ~',.. . , ~,.J, ~~U~) -E.-=l~~::i~;.::) ~:~-'C: ,i,~.~i~2 .. 1..... ,.....'.... ~ _r~_~,:_,'_,,'.~_, "."".,'~I.4~". C',_ -,', ":c \-~;b l ;sIJ.u 1';;'~. - -" - - - .-:.~\!:~-~,. "'}:'1.'.~~2..r.~:~~ f1~{,:'".:( .:.::1.:j_<~i.:.~t~:)~.:;- 1'~---.-~'::~~:;l ~.: 1-11.:.- Subsection li9. Proposed Reuse of Prooerty. ~ .- . - ,. _.J ~':. .~ .~) ;.. :.~ '.- "~ :. . (AS ORI INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) . ~ I.' Current Land Use The current land uses in the development district include public/semi-p blic, residential, multi-family residen- tial, industrial, Ian consumptive/highway oriented commercial and retail/office/serv'ce commercial. The development sites are or will be zoned in co formance with zoning standards for commer- cial ~nd industrial us 2. Proposed Reu Land It is propo ed that a portion of the property identi- fied in Section C of the Development Plan will be acquired for the construction of a restaurant and bank expansion. The restau- rant site is capable of accommodating 6,000 square feet of on- site development plu related deck, patio space and parking. Certain existing stru tures will be relocated or demolished to prepare for this deve opment. The size of the bank expansion is yet to be determined s well as the extent of rehabilitation of certain buildings in he "historic district." (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) In additio, several individual developments are planned for certain v cant parcels in the industrial park. (AS ODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) It is propo ed that a portion of the property identi- fied in Subsection 1. 4 of the Development Plan will be acquired for the construction of an elderly housing development. The 35 acre site is capable of accommodating 283 units of residential rental development pI 5 related retail/limited commercial devel- opment and parking. The development parcel is currently vacant. Phase I will consist of 64 units of lowrise housing, Phase IIA will be 80 units of owrise housing the Phase lIB will be a two story 75 unit develop ent. Phase IlIA is estimated to include a shopping/retail facility and Phase IIIB consists of 64 units of lowr ise housing. Th city may also assist wi th the public im- provement and land cquisi tion costs for the expansion of an existing hotel. ) T is project is further described in Ex- hibit IV-A. ODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, .1989) The public development include The estimated public increment financing section 1.5. improvements needed to bring about the new ite improvements, and general improvements. improvement costs are referenced in the tax Ian and are collectively described in-Sub-. 1-12 -;: . . . The Development Program does not contemplate the acqui- sition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be cons ide red , mus t be wi thin the framework of the-- above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and/or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. Subsection 1.10. DeveloDment District. Administration and Maintenance of (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 5, 1985) Maintenance and operation of the public improvements in the municipal development district will be the responsibility of the development district administration of the City. Each year the administrator of the municipal development district will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget for t,he following year to be charged to the property in the distr ict. The Ci ty Council will certify the assessments to the County Auditor for collection. The City Council will levy these assessments, if any, in accordance wi th the procedures estab- lished in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) The municipal development district administrator will administer the municipal development distr ict pursuant to the provisions of Section 472A.lO of the Minnesota Statutes provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the City Council. No action taken by the administrator of the development district pursuant to the above-mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the City Council. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Coordinator of the City who shall serve as Administrator of the Development Distr ict. The powers, duties and responsibilities of the Administrator are spelled out in the Administrative Guide for the Administration of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, attached hereto as Appendix A. Each year the Administrator will submit to the Council the _ maintenance and operation budget for the following year. __;<~:-:~,:, - .," '.,_>_ ' c,' ~.- ... ':~ :: 1-13 ___ "7 sub~ection lrll. Rehabilitation. .. :(AS ORIfINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Although the City has designated a rehabilitation zone to target such improve ents within the Central Business District, no rehabilitation stan ards nor a formal program for rehabilita- tion of buildings has been adopted. The City will encourage the use of industrial dev lopment revenue bonds or notes (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474) for rehabilitation, renovation and expan- sion of existing buil ings in the project as well as State of Minnesota grant funds nd tax increment proceeds. (AS FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Owners of operties wi thin the Development Distr ict will be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable st te and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standa ds. Owners of properties who purchase property wi thin the Development Distr ict from the Ci ty may be required to rehabilita e their properties as a condition of sale of land. The City wil provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from ederal, state or local sources. Subsection 1 Relocation. (AS ORI INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City ac epts its binding obligations under provi- sions of federal and state law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 through 117.56) for relocation and will administer payment benefits to individual and businesses to be displaced by public action. (AS M DIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City ac epts its responsibility for providing for relocation pursuant t Section 469.133 of the Development Dis- trict Act. Subsection 1.13. Boundaries of Develo?ment District. ) Beginning at a point of intersection with the centeL lines of Aspen Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence southerly f om said point along :the center- line of Third Street to a point of intersec- tion with t e centerline of Orleans Street; thence west rly from said point along said centerline, s extended between Everet Street and.Washing on Street, -, to its intersection District No. 1 as Boundaries established 1-14 . with the easterly right-of-way line of County Road No 5; thence southwesterly from said point and along said right-of-way line to its intersectiqn with the southern municipal boundary; thence easterly more or less, from said point along said southerly municipal boundary to its intersection wi th the west- erly shoreline of Lake St. Croix; thence northerly from said point and along said shoreline to its intersection wi th the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence wester 1y from said point along said center- line to its intersection with the centerline of First Street; thence northerly from said point and along said centerline to a point of intersection with the centerline of Aspen Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to the point of beginning. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) . Beginning at a point of intersection with the center lines of Aspen Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence southerly from municipal boundary; thence easterly more or less, from said point along said southerly municipal boundary to its intersection wi th the westerly shoreline of Lake St. Croix; thence northerly from said point and along said shoreline to its INTER- SECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF ST. CROIX AVENUE, AS EXTENDED; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY FROM SAID POINT AND ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO ITS intersection with the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of First Street; thence northerly from said point and along said centerline to a point of intersec- tion with the centerline of Aspen Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to the point of beginning. ) -(AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12 , 1985) . Beginning at a point of intersection with the center "lines of Aspen- Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence southerly from said point along the center- line of Third Street to a point of intersec- tion, wi th.:the . centerline of Orleans Street; thence westerly from - said ;:>point along said_ l-lS-.C "7 centerline,1 as extended between Everet Street and Washin ton Street, to its intersection' with the ea terly right-of-way line of parcel 9032-2620, thence northerly along said eas- terly line to its intersection with the northerly ine of parcel 9032-2620; thence easterly a ong said northerly line to its intersectio wi th the easterly right-of-way line of C unty Road No 5; thence south- westerly f om said point and along said right-of-wa line to its intersection with \ the south rn municipal boundary; thence easterly mo e or less, from said point along said south rly municipal boundary to its intersectio wi th the wester ly shoreline of Lake St. C oix; thence northerly from said point and a ong said shoreline to its inter- section wi h the centerline of St. Croix Avenue, as extended; thence wes ter ly along said center ine to its intersection with the cente.r 1 ine f Main St reet; thence southerly from said pint and along said centerline to its interse tion wi th the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to its intersectio with the centerline of First Street;thece northerly from said point and along said enterline to a point of intersec- tion wi th he centerline of Aspen Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline 0 the point of beginning. MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) That part f the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washi gton County, Minnesota, lying easterly of County High ay No. 66, and lying Northerly of a line from a poi t on the centerline of County Highway No. 66, 250.35 feet South of the North line of said Southwest Q arter of the Southwest Quarter, to a point on the Eas line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Q arter 250.03 feet South of the North line. Subject to asements of record. > That part 0 the West 128 feet of the East 555 feet of the Southw st Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, :lying North of the. Northerly ight-of-way of State Trunk Highway 212 (State High ay No. 36), 'except the North 661.4 feet of said Southw st Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. \ ~- -.-. .\. 1-16 ~" . . . 7" That part of the East 427 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right-of-way line of state Trunk Highway 212 (state Highway No. 36), except the North 661.4 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. That part of the West Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right- of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (state Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of record. That part of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota; and the West Half of the East Half except the Easterly 300 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the Northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of record. The East 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West,. Washington County, Minnesota, except_ that part lying Southerly of a line 350 feet North of and parallel to the Northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (state Highway No. 36). That part of the West 135 feet of the East 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the North right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway 36) and lying Southerly of a line 350 feet North of and parallel to said North right-of-way line. Subsection 1.14. Parcels To Be Acquired or May Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) (Tax Increment Financing District No 1) ) ;" PIN 9028-0030 11022-2000 1-17 ~ (Tax ncrementFinancing District No.2) PIN \ 10691-3950 10691-3830 10691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 10691-3770 10691-4040 10691-4010 10691-4070 10691-3990 10691-3980 10691-3740 (Tax Increment Financing District No.3) PIN 9032-2620 (Tax Increment Financing District No.4) PIN 9032-2610 9032-2612 (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) (Tax Increment Financing District No.5) That part f the West Half of the West Half of the Southeast Q arter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Townsh'p 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Min esota, lying North of the Northerly right- of-way lin of state Trunk Highway No. 212 (state Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of record. (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) (Ta Increment Financing District No.1) PIN '" 10691-3590 10691-3650 10691-2000 10691-2030 < -'10691-2060 10691-2090 10691-2120 -- ..... . - - --. - 1-18 I . . . . ect) : ~ May 7, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was adopted by the City Council. October 1, -.1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. \ November 3, 1987: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No.1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased costs. September 19, 1989: . The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of Tax Increment Financing District No.1. Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 (Nelle Project): December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was adopted by the City Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No.1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was modified by the city Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. ) Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 (Arkell proj- December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was adopted by the City Council. - ." ~:- -. ~. ~ Project) : \ proj ect) : -:- Fehrua 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Inc ement Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No.1. June 20 19 9: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City C uncil to reflect an enlargement of the project are and increased project costs. Tax Increme t Financing District No. 4 (Woodland Lake A ril 1 19 6: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 4 was adopted by the City Co ncil. Februar f or Tax Inc by the City mast.er plan 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan ement Financing District No. 4 was modified Council to reflect the implementation of a concept within Development District No.1. June 20 19 9: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increme t Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City C uncil to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. Tax t Financing District No. 5 (Brick Pond June 20 The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Incremen Financing District No. 4 was adopted by the City Council. 7" (Tax Increment Financing District NO.2) . 10691-3720 10691-3740 10691-3770 10691-2150 Subsection 1.15. Modification of Development Program for Development District No.1. 1. On October I, 1985, the Development Program was modi- fied ~y the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area. ' 2. On December 12, 1985, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area. 3. On February 21, 1989, the Development Program was modi- fied by the city Council to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No 1 and increased project costs. 4. On June 20, 1989, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs. . _ 5. On September 19, 1989, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect a change in the parcels to be or may be acquired within the Project Area. . 1-19 ~ SECTION II. MODIFIED AX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCR ENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (D6 ntown and Industrial Park Scattere Site Redevelopment District) (AS ODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) NOTE: As 0 February 21, 1989, the City has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment f inanqing distr icts ocated wi thin Development Dis tr ict No. l. Tax Increment Financing District No.1 was established and its Tax Increment Financi g Plan was approved on May 7, 1985. The Tax Increment Financing P an was subsequently modified on October 1, 1985, December 12, 19 5, November 3, 1987 and February 21, 1989. This Section II is pr vided to combine all modifications into one document. Attached s Exhibits IIA, II-B, II-C and' I1-D are portions of the 0 iginal plan and modifications through November 3, 1987, whi ~ are not required to be provided in the Tax Increment Financ'ng Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subd vision 1, and therefore are not reflected in this Section II. Subsection .1. Statement of Ob'"iectives. See Section I, Modified Developme t Program for Development District No.1, Subsection 1.4, State ent of Objectives. Subsection .2. Develooment Proqram. Modified Development Program for Development Subsections 1.1 throu h 1.15. See Section I, District No.1, Subsection Increment Financin located in the City 0 Minnesota: 2.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax District No.1. The following parcels Stillwater, County of Washington, State of (AS OR GINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Parcel Identific tion Numbe r 9028-0020 9028-0050 9033-2364 9033-2314 9033-2318 10200-2300 10200-2325 10200-2350 10200-2550 10690-2000 10690-2050 10690-2150 Fee Owner Muller Boat Works Maple Island Farm, Inc. DFE, Inc. Beim Construction Company H & I Wood Specialties Goetz, James B. Goetz, James B. Kern, 0.; Skinner, N.; et al Meisterling, Orn & powell Atwood Forge & Foundry Co. . McGuire, Michael G. Muller Boat Works ,-.. ,-.. - '. ... I . 2-1 . . 10690-4050 10690-6900 10690-6950 10690-7000 10690-7050 10690-7100 10690-7150 10690-7200 10690-7250 10690-7300 10690-7350 t0690-7400 10690-7450 10690-7500 10690-7550 10691-2390 10691-2450 10691-2510 10691-2540 10691-2570 10691-2600 10691-2660 10691-2720 10691-2750 10691-2752 10691-2780 10691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 10691-4100 10691-4130 10691-4160 10691-5540 10691-5570 10691-5600 10691-5630 10691-5660 10691-5960 10691-5720 10691-5750 10691-5780 10691-5810 10692-2900 10692-3050 10692-3100 10692-3200 10692-3220 10692-3250 10692-3270 10692-3700 10692-3750 10692-3800 10692-3850 10692-3900 . . - '.:~ ',:) ;..~ 0>. ,~.'.r' ABS Co. McGuire, Michael G. McGuire, Michael G. Olson, William Jr. and Del1aina Olson, William Jr. and Dellaina Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Belideau, Edna E. Belideau, Milton H. and Edna E. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Olson, William Jr. and Dellaina Powell, William H. Nyberg, Clark R. and Orff, Judd E. Malon, Donald Malon, Donald Filson, Bruce F. Filson, Bruce F. Sicard, Dale Standefer, James E. and Rice, J.D. Standefer, John R. et al Lind, Leslie R. Hooley, Charles M. and John W. Northern FEderal S & L Assoc. Nelle, Inc. Nelle, Inc. Berrisford, Anne E. Baglo, Clarence V. and Violet M. Thompson, Richard E. and Elenore Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Kemper, Fredrick L. Liedle, Paul Frye, Ed W. and Del H. St. Croix Drug Co. Peder Gaalaas Inc. Farmers Union Grain Terminal New Stillwater Project Ltd. Lease Commander Mills New Stillwater Project Ltd. New Stillwater Project Ltd. New Stillwater Project Ltd. City of Stillwater J. L. H. Inc. Paukert, Richard E. and Carol M. 'Paukert, Richard E. and Carol M.. Tuenge, Richard R. ~..Kielsa, Donald R. and Marlene J. 2-2 10692-4250 10692-5200 10693-2310 11022-2000 11022-2050 11140-2000 11140-2100 11140-2200 11140-2300 11159-2050 11159-2400 1,1159-2600 1'1159-2650 11159-2700 11159- 2 9 50 11999-2100 11999-2300 7" ". Gordon, Sherman & Lucil,le . ~ Gordon, Sherman & Lucille -~State of Minnesota Langness, Robert o. McGuire, Michael G. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hooley, Charles M. Washington Federal Sav & Ln Hooley, John Hadrath et a1 Stillwater Bancorporation Stillwater Bancorporation Super Value Stores Super Value Stores N.P. Railway Co. (PARCELS ELETED AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1985) PIN Fee Owner 10200- 2 3 00 10200-2325 10692-3270 11159-2400 Goetz, ' James B. Goetz, James B. City of Stillwater Washington Federal Sav & Ln (PARCELS NCLUDED AS OF OCTOBER l, 1985) PIN Fee Owner 9028-0030 9033-2353 .9615-2800 10691-3230 10691-3260 10691-3290 10691-3320 10691-2900 10691-2930 10691-2990 10691-3020 10691-3050 10691-3080 10691-3110 10691-3140 106 91 - 5 9 00 10691-5930 10691-5990 10691-6050 10691-3350 10691- 3 38Cl 10691-3410 10691-3440 State of Minnesota N-F Properties, Inc. Bro1eck, a Mn Partnership Ogren, John K. City of Stillwater City of Stillwater City of Stillwater Van Meier, Katherine Ranum, Ruth C. Meister, Carl W. Madsen, Jens C. and Sandra J. Rygg, Robert H. & Doris M. Jones, David E. Melton, James E. & Joyce A. - Schneider, Richard L. St. John's Home Corp. Thompson, Robert B. Hudson, Thomas M. & Eleanor Hudson, ThomasM. & Eleanor ~_Maple Island Farm Inc. i.:'';: J,; Maple Island Farm Inc. . _ ;11>;;<1 Maple. Island Farm Inc. Mapl~ Island Farm Inc. ~ __ ~.. - ~,~. ~ 2-3 . 10691-3470 10691-6020 11159-3000 11159-3050 11140-2400 11999-2150 11999-2200 11999-2350 99908-0700 99908-0500 Maple Island f'arm Inc. Schley, Emma Lou Hooley, John Hadrath et al Hooley, John Hadrath et al St. Croix III Limited Partner N. P. Railway Co. N. P. Railway Co. N. P. Railway Co. Maple Island Farm Inc. Super Value Stores (PARCELS DELETED AS OF DECEMBER 12, 1985) PIN Fee Owner 10691-2780 10691-2900 10691-3230 10691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 10691-4100 10691-4130 10691-4160 Hooley, Charles M. & John W. Van Meier, Katherine Ogren, John K. Northern Federal S & L Assoc. Nelle, Inc. Nelle, Inc. Berresford, Anne E. Baglo, Clarence V. and Violet M. Thompson, Richard E. & Elenore (PARCELS INCLUDED AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 1987) . PIN Fee Owner . 10690-3750 10690-3800 10690-3900 10692-3300 10692-3320 10692-3350 10692-3450 10692-3470 10692-3550 10692-3650 10692-3500 10693-4100 10693-2050 10691-5390 9033-2351 9033-2425 9900-2050 9900-2100 10200-2300 10200-2325 11159-2000 11159-2025 11159-2400 9900-2000 9033-2372 Hohlt, Dessa & Trenda et al Fraser, Caroline L. Thompson, David C. & Mary Jo Nyberg, Clark R. Pritchard, Jean R. Sherburne, Duane E. & Jean A. Martin, Larry J. Anderson, Martin D. Hooley, William J. & Joan M. Turnbladh, Will C. Jr. Albright, Robert L. and Sandra J. Nolde, Donald F. & Marianne Bourbaghs, John Adams, W. Michael Swager, Gary D., Nominee Strohkirch, Dennis Immuno Nuclear Co. Immuno Nuclear Co. Goetz, James B. Goetz, James B. Pauley, Bill J. and Kern, Oscar Pauley, Bill J. and Kern, Oscar 1501 Partnership :.:.~ Anderson, Dennis -- ,;-: UFE Inc. : :~ ... "- _0" ..; .'. :_,) .:- 2-4-: -:- , ~ 9033-2376 9210-2050 _ -' 9210-2000 9615-2900 95033-2250 Ogren, John K. Bowman, Richard S. Bowman, Richard S. Feely, Leonard R. & Elizabeth Anez, Brunette R. (PARCELS IN LUDED AS OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) PIN Fee Owner 10691-6080 ],0693-2100 10691-3540 10691-3560 10691-3590 10691-3620 10691-3650 State of Minnesota City of Stillwater Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association A mo r e Clerk's Office. ic description is available from the City FURTHER INFORMATION R GARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFI E OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 2.4. Parcels in Acquisition. The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels i~entified in Section I, Subsection 1.14, of the Development Program. As the City acquires said parcels the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing D s tr ict No. 1 will be modified to reflect the acquisitions of said parcels. The followi g are conditions under which properties not designated to be acqu'red may be acquired at a future date: ( 1 ) The City acquire property by condemnatio or direct purchase from order to achieve the objectives of financing p ani and gift, dedication, willing sellers in the tax increment (2) Such acquis tions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related cos s. Subsection Occur within the Tax 2.5. Develooment Activities ncrement Pinancin District. Expected to (AS ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The: develo ers plan to construct a 6,000 square foot . restaurant and reI ted parking, 500,000 square feet of . industrial/office bu'ldings in the industrial/corrunercial plants as well as miscella eous downtown corrunercial rehabilitation of existing buildings. he developer may be assisted with a portion )..- .. 2-5 -::- of the acquisition, relocation, demolition, . facility and parking costs associated with the development through tax increments generated as developments. clearance, public various phases of a result of these (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) One developer plans to construct as, 500 square foot industrial/office building and two developers plan expansions (40,000 square feet and 70,000 square feet) to existing industrial/office facilities. Tax increments generated from these developments may be used for land acquisition as well as public improvements consisting of: site preparation, relocation, utility upgrading, utility extensions, park improvements, parking improvements, planning/engineering and administration as determined by the City. See Appendix A of Exhibit II-B for proposed bonded projects, as of October I, 1985. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) . The 40,000 square foot industrial/office expansion mentioned above will be undertaken by INCSTAR Corporation, which plan to construct a 38,000 square foot office building and remodel and convert the existing office building to industrial use. Tax increment assistance may be used for land acquisition, as well as public. improvements consisting of: utilities, sanitary sewer, storm sewer,watermain, site preparation, landscaping, holding pond, capi talized interest, professional fees and administration, as determined by the city. Subsection 2.6. Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts Signed. The following contracts have been entered City of Stillwater and the persons named below: have been into by the (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) It is expected that the Phase I developments will have executed development contracts no later than the fall of 1985. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) As the developers will not be assisted by the city with their developments, no development contracts are anticipated at this time. "'. . ~.} r''^ 'f""- q. \. . .:~.i -.0. ~~- :.......;.~ .i.. .#'.':':J ;2 t~::.:'-: .0__ ..;.:. _ -.... .. _;:... ,,~;. i -~ ,~ .. ".;-'-' '" .... ~C~j~C~ ;~ jjlw ~~j~.~~s~ Jd ... .~-: ~. ~'; ..'-'" _..~ :':'~? .~ .. - . - '__. ".... ~.. .~ _ "4 2-6 '.... - ~.., 7" '. (AS M DIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) It is antici ated that the City and INCSTAR Corporation will have entered int a Contract for private- Redevelopment no later than February 21 1989. (As Contrac Stillwater, they will are entered into with the City of inserted in this Subsection.) As a part 0 the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelop ent district, the other phases of the program may provide or addi tional public facili ties, business relocation and land acquisition. In addition, the City may assist with the rehab litation of historic structures within the district, parking, and additional industrial expansion. Depending on the av ilabili ty of public funds, the Phase II development should co ence within the next two years. INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Subsection 2.7. Other Soecific Develooment Exoected to Occur within the Tax crement Financin District. (As specifi development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 2.8. Estimated Cost ofproiect. See Subsection 1. 5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associated with the D velopment District. Subsection Indebtedness. 2.9. Estimated Arr)ount of Bonded (AS OR GINALLY ACDPTED MAY 7, 1985) An estimat Phase I is expected issue is 15 years a percent. The amount $15,000 to $23,000. of the amount of bonded indebtedness for o be $60,000 to $90,000. The term of the d the interest rate is expected to be 10 of capitalized interest is estimated to be (A MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) If all of he development occurs listed in Appendix A of Exhibit II-B th t has bond allocations, the $200,000 tax > increment could amor ize an additional $1,360,000. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) It is no indebtedness relatin this time. :anticipated that any additional bonded to the recent developments will occur at , 2-7 -, .' (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) .. It . is -anticipated that the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred in regard to the INCSTAR Corporation project' will not exce-ed $700,000. Subsection 2.10. Sources of Revenue. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Several sources of revenue may be used to finance publ i ~ cos ts assoc ia ted wi th the development pro j ects in the municipal development district including tax increment financing, industrial revenue bonds, 312 rehabilitation loans, and Small Cities Development Grant funds. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. The restaurant is expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1986 at which time the development will generate an annual tax increment of $9,000 to $13,800 collectable in 1987 once fiscal disparities has been allocated to the metro pool. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) . An additional $200,000 could be available (after fiscal disparities). if all of the bond financed development is completed. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) Several sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects located within the municipal development district. These sources include tax increments, industrial revenue bonds, 312 rehabilitation loans, Small Cities Development Grant funds, and special assessments. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes to assist in the financing of public development costs. Of the three proposed additional developments included within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 a partial increment is expected to be received in 1989 with the full increment to be received in 1990. The addi tional development will generate an annual tax increment of approximately $177,657.91, collectible in 1990 after fiscal dispar i ties has been allocated to the metro pool. Subsection 2.11. Estimated Oriqinal Assessed Value and . Captured Assessed Value*. . 2-8 -~ .. -:- INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Pursuant. Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Se tion 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Original Assessed Value (OAVr - for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopmen district is based on the value placed on the property by the Co nty Assessor in 1984. This assessed value is $3,600,000. Each ear the Office of the County Auditor will measure the a.mount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax incr ment redevelopment district to calculated the tax increment ayable to the Stillwater redevelopment distr~ct fund. In any ear in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted or'ginal assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any ye r in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment fina cing redevelopment district declines below the or ig inal assessed valuation, no assessed valua t ion will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County uditor shall certify in each year after the da te the Or iginal Assessed Value was certif ied, the amount the OAV has increased or ecreased as a result of: 1. change in t status of property; 2. reduction 0 enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; or 3. change due 0 stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abateme ts. Pursuant 0 Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Min esota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated C pturcd Asses:.;ed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $2,000,000 to $2,600,000 in all present and future phases. It is expe ted that an estimated $1,600,000 will be captured as a result of the restaurant and office and industrial building developments. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or ntil the project debt is retired. * These estimates are based on a 40% contribution to the fiscal disparities p 01 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, clause (b). ) (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) Pursuant 0 Minnesota - Statutes,' Section 273.74, Subdi vis ion 1 and Section 273.76 Subdi vis ion 1, the Or ig inal Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment ,financing redevelopm nt district is based on the value placed on the property by the ounty Assessor in 1984. This assessed value is estimated~at~$4,9 O,OOO:~.Each year the Office of the County Audi tor ..wilL"measure the.. amount of increase or. decrease in the 2-9 -- . . . -=- total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculated the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. \ The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Or iginal Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; or 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-order abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximately $2,000,000 to $2,600,000 in all present and future phases. It is expected that an estimated $1,900,000 will be captured as a result of the restaurant and office and industrial building developments. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Adjusted Original Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 is estimated at $7,207,591. This is calculated by adding the current assessed value of the additional parcels to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 $2,307,591 to the $ 4,900,000 Or iginal Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No.1 in 1984. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and) Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated additional Captured Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 relating to this modification is approximately $177,657.91. (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) Pursuant to Sections 469.175, subdivision .1, ~ and 469.177; subdivision 1,;of the Tax Increment Financing Act,-.the 2-10 I ~ Adjusted Original Ta District No. 1 is esti adding the current tax included in Tax Increm the $75.7,099 Original- District No. 1. Capacity of Tax Increment Financing ated at $816,879. This is calculated by capacity of the additional parcels to be nt Financing District No.1, $59,780, to Tax Capacity of Tax Increment Financing since no spe ific development is anticipated at this time on the additional parcels, there is no additional Captured Tax Capacity within ax Increment Financing District No. 1 relating to this modif'cation. \ Subsection 2.12. District. Type of Tax Increment Financinq (AS INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City cil of the city of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the nee for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Min esota Statutes, sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds tha the district to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, Subdivision 10. It has been determined that 59 of the parcels in the distri t (70 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and 29 percent of the buildings are struct rally substandard and an additional 31 percent of the buil ings are found to require substantial renovation or cleara ce in order to remove. such existing condi tions as; inade ate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationship , overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling uni density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or c nversion, or other identified hazards to health, safety and ge eral well-being of the community. The 59 structures on the 84 parcels of land consti tuting the redevelopment distric have been investigated by the Washington County Housing and Re evelopment Authority. Seventeen of the 59 buildings are deteri rated and structurally substandard to a degree requiring clea ance and 18 other structures are found to require substantial r novation in order to remove such existing condi tions as: inade ate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationship , overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling un't density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or con ersion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and ge eral well-being of the community. Thus, the tax increment inancing district appears to meet the statutory requirement of a redevelopment district and will henceforth be referr d to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. he parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a rede elopment tax increment financing district have been listed in A pendix B. 2-11 . . '. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance wi th Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivision 10. It has been determined that 80 of the parcels in the district (71.4 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and 35 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 33 percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renoVation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to heal th, safety and general well-being of the communi ty. The 80 structures on the 112 parcels of land constituting the redevelopment district have been investigated by the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Twenty-eight of the 80 buildings are deteriorated and structurally substandard to a degree requiring clearance and 27 other structures are found to require substantial renovation in order to remove such existing condi tions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use r ela t ionships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit densitYj obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the heal th, safety and general well-being of the community. Thus, the tax increment financing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a redevelopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B-1. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) It has been found that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 qualifies as a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, Subdivision 10(a)(2). Of the 30 addi tional parcels being incorporated into Tax Increment Financing District No.1, Washington County ERA has found that 21 parcels or 70% are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements; that 5 of the 21 parcels or 23.8% contain buildings which are structurally substandard; and that an addi tional 7 of the 21 parcels or 33.3 % contain buildings that require substantial renovation or clearance. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a . redevelopment type of tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B-2. Subsection 2.13. District No.1. Duration of Tax Increment Financing 2-12 "7 I (AS O~If.INALLY ADOPTED MAY 7~ 1985) . Pursuant t~ Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision I, the du ation of the tax increment district within the Development Dist-r ict must be indicated wi thin the finance plan. The duration f the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifications to the inance plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. \ (AS ODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) Pursuant t Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision 1, the collection of tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 may be collected up to 25 years from the da te of receipt of he first tax incr emen t. The firs t tax increment was receive by the city in 1986. Therefore, the City may collect tax incre ents generated from Tax Increment Financing District No.1 throug year 2010. Subsection 2.14. Jurisdictions. Estimated Imoact on Other Taxing (AS OR GINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The impact of the loss of. tax dollars represented as tax increments is es imated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is bas d on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include he possible tax increments derived from any other future developm nt, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Latest essed Value of Each Government Bod Tax Increment ance District 1/2/84 Total $3,600,000 % of District to Total Washington Count School District City of Still~at Other (Ketro Tra Council, Mosquit : Vo Tech 916) $ 766,928,175 265,063,453 72,818,081 1.2 3.5 12.6 34 r sit, Metro Control, 2,740,931,323 .3 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school, city and county districts will have over 82% of each res ective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction , ,/ 2-13 Mills Percent City 27.832 26% County 25.389 24% School District 834 48.000 45% Other 6.211 05% . Total 107.432 100.0% . . ~ to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as follows: All Future Captured Assessed Valuation Phases Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $2,600,000 $278,000* * After contribution to the fiscal disparities pool Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Tax Increment $72,280 66,720 125,100 13,900 $278,000 The following table represents the addi tional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jur isdiction. The tax increments der i ved from the elderly housing alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could eventually permit a ill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jur isdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. ~:) .~ ,~ :; :.::-;:..; ~ :: _'_--I :;;1. -> ~-i ";- ,;<:~ ,'0. .:: ~~~.:.. 'i 3 (. ~....... .~ .~. -;..: ~' i..... ,_.; "_ 2-14 - ~ Adjusted* Required Tax ssessed Value Mills Increment School District $265,063,453 .472 $125,100 County $766,928,175 .087 $66,720 City $72,818,081 .993 $72,280 ( MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) The impact of t of tax dollars represented as tax increments is es below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate s based on the existing redevelopment proposals and do s not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Fi ance District 1/2/84 Total $4,900,000 Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Bod % of District to Total Washington Count School District city of stillwat Other (Metro Tra Council, Mosquit VA Tech 916) 34 r sit, Metro Control, $766,928,175 265,063,453 72,818,081 .639% 1. 849% 6.729% 2,740,931,323 .179% Considering all he districts, it can be seen from the above that the school nd county districts will have over 98% of each respective istrict available for normal growth of tax base or valuati n. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 198 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill r te and the estimated tax increment received reveals the ann al loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development waul occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as fol ows: All Future Captured Assessed Valuation Phases Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Fi ance District $3,599,432 "$386,694* 2-15 ":" . * After contribution to the fiscal disparities pool Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent Tax Increment City 27.832 26% $72,280 County 25.389 24% 66,720 School District 834 48.000 45% 125,100 Other 6.211 05% 13,900 Total 107.432 100.0% $278,000 \ . The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for publ ic intervention by the city. Al though the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination" is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the proj ects occurred without the assistance of the City. Adjusted* Assessed Value Required Mills Tax Increment School County City * District $260,163,453 $762,028,175 $67,918,081 Tax Increment District assessed .481 .088 1.064 valuation $125,100 $66,720 $72,280 subtracted. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) The additional estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District No.1. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. - Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the ,fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of the city, the following estimated impact of Tax . 2-16 -:- Increment Financing D" strict No. 1 would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: IMPACT OF TAX BASE % of dditional Additional Additional Captured original Future Captured Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Value to E:nti ty Tax Base Value Value Value* Entity \^Jashington County \ 851,852,556 ,307,591 4,412,931 2,105,340 .247% stillwater 80,795,336 ,307,591 4,412,931 2,105,340 2.606% S. D. 834 288,278,482 ,307,591 4,412,931 2,105,340 .730% Entity Washington Stillwater S.D. 834 Area Vo-Tec . Other ** Total IMPACT ON MILL RATES Current Mill Rate Additional Potential Taxes 26.499 28.850 54.083 1.396 4.767 $ 55,790 60,739 113,863 2,939 10,036 115.595 $243,367 * Does n t include fiscal disparities contribution ** Includ s Met Transit, Met Council, Hennepin County parks, etc No specific additional property. anticipate capturing properties, so there under either test re the Tax Increment Fin Financin Subsection Plan for Sa (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) new development is expected to occur on the At the present time the City does not ny new tax increment from these additional is no impact on other taxing jurisdictions ired by Section 469.175, subdivision I, of ncing Act. 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Increment Financin District No.1. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) The Tax I crement Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District N . 1 was modified to reflect a modification of the geographic are of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 and increased proje t costs within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. , 2-17 - "~ I I . . . ":'" (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) . The Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was the gepgraphic area. within No. 1. Financing Plan for Tax Increment modified to reflect a reduction of Tax Increment Financing District (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified to reflect an enlargement of the geographic area of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 and increased project costs within Tax Increment Financing District No.1. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified to reflect the implementation of a master proj ect concept wi thin Development District No. 1 and the modification of the Development Program to reflect increased project costs within the project area, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to. the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased proj ect costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsections 1.5 and 1.13 of the Development Program. (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) . The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified to reflect an enlargement of the geographic area of Tax Increment Financing District No.1. 2-18 ':"" SECTION III. TAX I CREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCR NT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 (NELLE PROJECT) NOTE: As 0 February 21, 1989 the Ci ty has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing districts 1 cated within Development District No.1. Tax Increment Financin District No 3 was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on December 12, 1985. The Februaty 21, 1989 modi ication to the Tax Increment Financing Plan 1S to implement such a concept. At tached as Exhibi t IV-A are portions of the origi al plan which are not required to be pro- v ided in a tax incr e en t financing plan pur suan t to Minnesota S tat ute s , Sect ion 4 6 9 . 1 7 5 , Sub d i vis ion 1, and the ref 0 rea r e not reflected in this Sect on IV. Subsection 3 1. Statement of Oblectives. tion I, Modified Dev lopment Program for Development No.1, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. See Sec- District Subsection 3 2. DeveloDment PrOQram. Modified Development Program for Development Subsection 1.1 through 1.15. See Sect ion I, District No.1, Subsection 3 3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financin District No.2. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, Co nty of Washington, State of Minnesota: P.I.N.# : 1 ,,1.~' '':. . ~" .-1 ...,. :';"'.1 106913800 106913770 106913740 106913720 106912150 106912240 106912300 106912330 106912780 106912810 106912900 106913830 106913860 106913890 106913920 106913950 106913980 .106913990 106914010 106914040 106914070 3-1 (Block 19) (Block 18) (Block 19) . '; . . . _106914100 .. : 106914130 106914160 106915270 106915300 106915330 106915360 106915420 106915450 106915480 106915510 \ FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING D1 STRICT NO. 2 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 3.4. Parcels in ACquisition. Pr oper ties iden t i f ied for acqui sit ion will be acqu ired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce bl igh t, bligh ting factor s, causes of bl igh t, or the spread of bl igh t and deter ior a t ion; to el imi na te unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or det r imen tal uses; assemble land for redevelopmen t; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the. uses and objectives set forth in this plan. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Section I, Subsection 1.14 of the Development Program. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: ( 1 ) The City may acquire condemnation or direct order to achieve the financing plan; and property by gift, dedication, purchase from willing sellers in objectives of the tax increment (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related .costs. Subsection 3.5. Development Activity in the Tax Incre- ment Financinq District No.2. The developer plans. to rehabilitate and expand a commercial hotel project (Nelle) within the Development District Modification 2 area. The developer may be assisted with a portion of the land acquisition, public; improvement and parking costs associated with the various :phases of development through tax 3-2 ~ .' increments generated as a result of these developments. 'rhe hotel"" expansions of up to 2 addi tional uni ts, proposed hotel/motel:. additions and learning center are further described in Appendix A. to Exhib~t III-A, Esti~ te of Tax Increments. .Subsection 3.6. DeveloDment Activity Increment Financin District for which Contract have The following contract have been entered into by Stillwat r and the pers ns named below: in the Tax been si ned. the Ci ty of It is expect d that the Phase I developments will have executed development co tracts no later than the spring of 1986. (As Contracts Stillwater, they will b are entered into wltn the inserted in this Subsection). City of Subsection 3.7. Other SDecific DeveloDment EXDected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. As a part of the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelopme t district, the other phases of the program may prov ide for addi t . onal publ ic faci 1 i ties, and land acqui s i- tion. Depending on th availability of public funds, the Phase II development should co ,ence wi thin the next two years. (See Appendix "A" to Exhibi III-A for Estimate of Tax Increments.) (As other sp cific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into his Subsection.) Subsection 3 8. Estimated Cost of Prolect. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Dev lopment Program for estimated costs associ- ated with the Developm nt District. Subsection Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. An est of the amount of bonded indebtedness for all phases is exp cted to be approximately $3,500,000 based upon all projects in the Nelle project being constructed. The term of the issue i 15 years and the interest rate is 8.5 percent. The amount of maximum capitalized interest is estimated to be $892,50n. The -mount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount sufficien to pay interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenue to meet sche uled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as r quired by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalize interest prior to issuance is extremely difficulty as it is function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timOng; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalize interest and is subject to change. - Subsection 3.10. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, a quisition, and site preparation costs and other costs outlin d in the ,Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection ~.7 abov) will be :financed through the annual collection of tax 'ncrements as described below. It is . 3-3 ' . anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. - Other sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs ass9ciated wi th the development projects in the municipal development district including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and federal funds. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or ass i s t in the f i nanc i ng of publ ic development cos ts. The cOIT~er~ial development expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1989 at which time the development is estimated to generate maXlmum annual tax increment of $386,694 collectable in 1990. Subsection 3.11. Estimated Orioina1 Assessed Value and Estimated CaDtured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment. . Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivi- Slon 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the prop- erty by the County Assessor in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $1,333,542. Each year the Office of the County Audi tor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivi- sion 1 and Minnesota statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the maximum estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax incre- ment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $3,599,432 in all present and future phases. This amount will be . :!-' ~--, --'.. :..' .,~ 3-4 captured for up to twen y-five years or until the project debt is retired. j Subsection 3. 2. Type of Tax Increment Financinq Dis- . trict. The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclu- sive, finds that the distr ict to be established is a housing district pursuant to M nnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivi- sion ID. It has been determined that 23 of the parcels in the distr ict (71 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, ctilities or other imp ovements and 20 percent of the buildings are structurally subst ndard and an additional 30 percent of the buildings are found to equire substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding ob buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazar s to health, safety and general well-being of the conununity. Th 23 structures on the 32 parcels of land constituting the redev lopment district have been investigated by the Washington County ous ing and Redevelopment Au thor i ty. Fi ve of the 23 buildings ar deteriorated and structurally substandard to a degree requir ing learance and 8 other structures are found to require substantial. renovation in order to remove such existing condi t ions as: i nade ua te st reet layout, incompatible uses or land use relationship , overcrowding of buildings. on the land, excessive dwelling uni density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or con ersion, or other identified hazards to the heal th, safety and g neral well-bein} of the communi ty. Thus, the tax increment fina cing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a red velopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a rede elopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax incr ment financing district have been listed in Appendix B of Exhibit II-A. Subsection 3 13. District No.2. Duration of Tax Increment Financinq Pursuant to innesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivi- sion I, the duration of the tax increment district within the Development Distri~t ust be indicated within the finance plan. The duration of the t x increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt f the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifica- tions to the finance Ian for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. Subsection 3.14. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing 3-5 . . . The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This: estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future ~evelopment, ciill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/85 Total $1,133,542 Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, VocTech 916) $809,314,635 $294,571,383 $76,125,857 .140 .385 1. 49 $2,740,931,323 .041 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school and county districts will have over 99% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base o.r. valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and. the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. " 3-6 -.. ----- 7" The finance plan indicates an anticipated tax increment at build out as follows: Maximum Captured Assessed Valuation Maximum Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Fin nce District $3,599,432 $386,694 Eased on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received \ would be as follo s for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent City 27.832 26% County 25.389 24% School District 834 48.000 45% Other 6.211 05% Total 107.432 100.0% Maximum Tax Increment $100,179 91,386 172,773 22,356 $386,694 The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levi d to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated ~ax incre ents for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment district wo Id not be available to any of the taxing j ur i sdi ctions wer e it not for publ i c in tervent ion by the Ci ty. Although the increase in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax . ncrement financing district, this new as- sessed value could ev ntually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured a sessed value was available for each taxing jur'sdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax in rements may be determined. This determina- tion is facilitated y estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of he tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdict on that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. 3-7- . ~ . " Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment School District $293,437,841 .588 $172,773 Cou'nty $808,181,093 .113 $91,386 City. $74,992,315 1. 34 $100,179 *Tax Increment District assessed valuation subtracted. Financina Plan Decembe r 12, District No. been made. Subsection 3.15. Modification of Tax Increment for Tax Increment Financinq District No.2. As of 1985, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing 2 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.2 is hereby modified to reflect the implementation of the master plan concept and increased project costs of Development District No.1 as outlined in Section 1. Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) . Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 and 1.13 of the Modified Development Program. . 3-8 ' , ~j -:- SECTION IV. TAX ~NCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCEMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 (ARKELL PROJECT) .NOTE: As of February 21, 1989 the Ci ty has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing districts ocated within Development District No.1. Tax Increment Financi g District No 3 was established and its Tax Increment Financing P an was approved on December 12, 1985. The Febru~ry 21, 1989 mod"fication to the Tax Increment Financing Plan is to implernen t such a concept. At tached as Exhibi t IV-A are portions of the original plan which are not required to be pro- v ided in a tax inc r ment f inanc i ng plan pu r suan t to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1, and therefore are not reflected in this Sec ion IV. Subsection.1. Statement of Ob"iectives. tion I, Modified De elopment Program for Development No.1, Subsection 1.4 Statement of Objectives. See Sec- District Subsect ion Modified Development Subsection 1.1 throug .2. DeveloDment Prooram. Program for Development 1.15. See Section I, District No. I, Subsection .3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Finncinq District N . 3. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, C unty of Washington, State of Minnesota: P.I.N.# 90322620 FURTHER INFORMATION R GARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFF CE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection .4. Parcels in Acquisition. Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsa(e, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazar s; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrime tal uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set f rth in this plan. 4-1- )- . . ':.- . (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Section I, Subsec~ion 1.14 of the Development Program as modi- fied on June 13, 1988: -The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: ( 1 ) The City may acquire condemnation or direct order to achieve the financing plan; and property by gift, dedication, purchase from willing sellers in objectives of the tax increment (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 4.5. Development Activity ment Financinq District for which Contracts have following contracts have been entered into Stillwater and the persons named below: in the Tax Incre- been Siqned. The by the City of It is expected tha t the Phase I, I I and I I I develop- ments will have executed development contracts no later than the spring of 1986. (As Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection 4.6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. As a part of the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelopment district, the other phases of the program may provide for additional public facilities, and land acquisi- tion. Depending on the availability of public funds, the Phase II development should commence within the next two years. Phase II-A is expected to consist of 80 units of elderly housing located on 7.5 acres and Phase II-B consists of 75 units of two story elderly housing on 6 acres. Phase III-A consists of a shopping/retail facility located on approximately 9 acres and Phase III-B consists of 64 units of elderly housing. The total site size covering all five phases is approximately 35 acres. ) (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) ".:- Subsection 4.7. Estimated Cost of Project. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associ- ated with the Development District. 4-2 -:- Subsection Indebtedness. Estimated Amount of Bonded 4.8. An estimate f the maximum amount of bonded indebtedness for Phases I, II and ~II is expected to be $1,200,000. The term of the issue is 15 ye rs and ~he interest rate is expected to be 8.5 percent. The amo nt of capitalized interest for 3 years is estimated to be $306,0 o. This estimate is based upon all of the development occurring ithin the parameters describ~d in Appendix A to Exhibit IV-A. he amount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount su ficient to pay interest on the bonds from the d~te of issue unt'l the date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenue to eet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. predictin capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult a it is a function of interest rates, con- struction schedules an tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of ca italized interest and is subject to change. Subsection 4 Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition, a d site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Estim ted Cost of Project (Subsection 4.7 above) will be financed thro ghthe annual collection of tax increments as described below. t is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No.3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Develop- ment Program. Several othe sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associa ed with the development projects in the municipal development istrict including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and ederal funds as available. Tax increment financing refers to a unding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new devel- opment to finance, or assist in the financing of public develop- ment costs. Phase of the elderly housing development is expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1988 at which time the development will gen rate an annual tax increment of $44,200 collectable in 1989. An additional $156,000 per year of tax increment could be av ilable if all of the phases of development are completed. Timin of development phases, lease-up schedules and resul ting tax increment cash flow should be calculated and agreed upon between t e City and the developer as a part of the redevelopment contract prior to bond issuance. ) Subsection 4.10. Es t ima ted Or ig inal Assessed Value and Estimated Ca tured Ass ssed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment. Pursuant to innesota Statutes,' Section 273.74, Subdivi- sion 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the ity of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the prop- erty/ by the County. ssessor- in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $12,708.,;; Eachyeac the Office of the County Auditor 4-3-. :.. r -;- will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total . assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelop- ment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment dis- trict abo~e the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valu- ation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district de- clines below the or iginal assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. \ The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change ln tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivi- sion 1 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the _ maximum estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax incre- . men t financ ing redevelopment distr ict w. ill annually approximate $411,612 to $1,853,582 in all present and future phases. It is expected that an estimated $411,612 will be captured as a result of Phase I. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. Subsection 4.11. Tvpe of Tax Increment Financinq Dis- trict. Tax Increment Financing District No.3 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. lO(a)(2), a redevelop- ment district as defined below: The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for q tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclu- sive, finds that the district to be established is a housing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivi- sion 11. The tax increment financing distr ict consists of a project, a portion of which is intended for occupancy by persons or families of low ,and moderate income as defined in Chapter 462A and other state and federal legislation in connection with the issuance of 462C housing bonds. Thus, the tax increment financing district meets the statutory requirements of a housing district. Subsection 4.12. District No.3.. Duration of Tax Increment Financinq :.. . "Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivi- sion 1, . the duration of the tax increment district within. the' 4-4 -:- " Development District lust be indicated within'the finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from' the date of receipt f the first tax increment. Thus, it is r estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifica- tions to the finance'p an for subsequent phases or other changes, would .ter~inate in yea 2012. Subsection 4 13. Jurisdictions. Estimated Imnact on Other Taxinq The impact 0 the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This es t ima t e is based on t.e ex i s t i ng r edeve lopmen t proposal s and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mi 1 changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Fin nce District 1/2/85 Total $12,708 Latest Asses ed Value of Each Government Bod % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Tra sit, Metro Council, Mosquit Control, VocTech 916) $809,314,635 $294,571,383 $76,125,857 .002 .004 .017 $2,740,931,323 .0005 Consider ing all the distr icts, it can be seen from the above that the school and county districts will have over 99% of each respective distr ct available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applyi g the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied hy each t xing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by eac taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming develo ment would occur without public assistance. 4-5 -, \ The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment 4It a~ build out as follows: Phase Estimated Assessed Valuation I Estimated Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $411,612 $44,200 All Estimated Assessed Valuation Ph a Sf' Estimated Increment Received $1,863,582 $200,200 Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Maximum Tax IncremF;'ot $51,865 47,313 89,448 11,574 $200,200 The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax incremen ts der i ved from the development alluded to in the tax i ncr emen t di s t r ict would not be avai lable to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new as- sessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determina- tion is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the. tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. . 4-6.,;, School District County City *Tax Increment 7" Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment $294,558,675 .304 $89,448 $809,301,927 .058 $47,313 $76,113,149 .681 $51,865 trict assessed valuation subtracted. Subsection 4.14. Modification of Tax Tncrement Financinq Plan for Tax Increment Financinq District No.3. As of December 12, 1985, n modifications to Tax Increment Financing Distr{ct No. J or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. (AS ODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Pu r suan t to the adopt ion of the modi fica tion of the Modified Development rogram for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financi g Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.3 is hereby modi ied to reflect the implementation of the master plan concept nd increased project costs of Development District No.1 as ou lined in Section 1. Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (A MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development roc;ram for Development District No.' 1, the Tax Increment Financi g Ian for Tax In~rement Finincing District No. 3 is hereby modif ed to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased roject costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 and 1.13 of the Modified Development Program. 4-7 . SECTION V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 NOTE: As of February 21, 1989 the Ci ty has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing "districts located within Development District No 1. Tax Increment Financing District No 4 was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on April 1, 1986. The February 21, 1989 modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan is to impl emen t such a concept. At tached as Exhi bi t V-A ar e portiops of the original plan which are not required to be pro- vi ded in a tax i ncr emen t f i nanc i ng plan pu r suan t to Mi nnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1, and therefore are not reflected in this Section V. Subsection 5.1. Statement of Ob"iectives. tion I, Modified Development Program for Development No.1, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. See Sec- District Subsection 5.2. DeveloDment Proqram. Modified Development Program for Development Subsection 1.1 through 1.15. See Sect ion I, District No.1, . Subsection 5.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financinq District No.4. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, County of Washington, Stat~ of Minnesota: Owner P.I.N. 90322610 90322612 Croixgate, Land Co. Croixgate Land ~. ~ FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREi'1ENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 5.4. Parcels in Acquisition. Properti s identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, :1989) . The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Section I, Subsection 1.14 of the Development Program. 5-1. ~ 7" The followin are conditions under which properties not- designated to be acqui ed may be acquired at a future date: ( 1 ) The Ci ty m condemnation order to ac "financing pI y acquire or direct ieve the n; and property by gift, dedication, purchase from willing sellers in objectives of the tax increment r I (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance 0 funding to finance the acquisition and related cost . Subsection 5.5. Develooment Activitv ment FinancinG District for which Contracts have following contracts ave been entered lnto Stillwater and the persons named below: in the Tax Incre- been SiGned. The by the City of It is expec ed that the Woodland Lakes Development will have executed develop ent contracts no later than the summer of 1986. (As Contracts ar entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection .6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment FinancinG District. The develop r plans to construct a 360,000 square foot shopping mall, a 150 room hotel, a 13,000 square foot banking facility, and 84,300 quare feet of office and retail space. The developer may be assi ted with a portion of the land acquisition, site improvements, an parking costs associated with the various phases of development through tax increments generated as a result of these developments. The proposed development is further de- scribed in Appendix A of Exhibit V-A, Estimate of Tax Increment. (As other s ecific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection .7. Estimated Cost of Pro-;ect. See Sub- section 1.5 of the De elopment Program for estimated costs associ- ated with the Develop ent District. Subsection 5.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted- ness. An estimate of the maximum amount of bonded indebted- ness, using 60% of th tax increment, is expected to be $3,711,020 based on all projec s in the Woodland Lakes development being constructed. The term of the issue is 16 years and the interest rate of 7 percent is ased upon a tax exempt bond. Due to pendinq federal Ie islation the bonds ma be taxable and the interest rate may be bigher.v he amount of capitalized interest years is estimated to be $997, 20. The amount of capitalized interest will 5-2 -:- '1 .e equal to an amount sufficient to pay interest on the bonds from he date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax ~ increment revenue to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not. exceeding 3. years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. Excess increment may be used to issue future bonds or to pay additional costs for improvements in the municipal development district. Subsection 5.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection 5.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Develop- ment Program. . Several other sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects in the municipal development district including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and federal funds. Tax increment financing" refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valu- ation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. The commercial development is expected to be fully assessed begin- ning in 1991 at which time the development is estimated to gener- ate maximum annual tax increment of $1,144,800 collectable in 1992 (PLAN A). Subsection 5.10. Oriqinal Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivi- sion 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the prop- erty by the County Assessor in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $60,650. Each year the Office of the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value oE the tax increment redevelopment district to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelop- ment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment dis- trict above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valu- ation in" the tax increment financing redevelopment district . __I ,." - \". 5-3. -:- declines below the lloriginal assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. " The County uditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Ass€ssed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change ln of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the distric \ 3 . change due court-order o stipulations, d abatements. adjustments, negotiated or Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivi- sion 1 and Minnesota tatutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured A sessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing r€developm nt district will annually approximate $10,062,715 in all pr sent and future phases. This amount will be captured for up to tw nty-five years or until the project debt is retired. Subsection TVDe of Tax Increment Financinq Dis- .11. tric~. The City Co ncil of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the ne d for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minne ota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78inclu- sive, finds that the istri~t to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivi- sion 10{a)(3). Less than 70 percent of the parcels in the dis- trict are occupied y buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but du to unusual terrain, or soil deficiencies requiring substantial filling, grading or other physical prepara- tion for use at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair ~~rket va ue upon inclusion in the redevelopment dis- trict which, when ad ed to the estimated cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs directly related to roads as defined in section 1 0.01 and local imDrovements as described in section 429.021, subdivision 1, clauses 1 to 7,11, and 12, and section 420.11, if an , exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of s id preparation. No parcel be included within a redevelopment district pursuant t this paragraph unless the authority has concl uded an ag reeme t or ag r eements for the development of at least 50 percent of t e acreage having the unusual soil or terrain deficiencies, which a reement provides recourse for the authority should the developme t not be completed. · Development agreements . will be executed pri r to the approval of the Tax Increment Fi- nance Distr iet Plan. Thus, the tax increment financing distr ict appears to meet the statutory requirements of ._a redevelopment district and will hen eforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax 5-4 ~ i . -:- ..:~ . increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B of Exhibit V-A. Subsection 5.12. District No.4. Duration of Tax Increment Financing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivi- sion 1, the duration of the tax increment district within the Oeve 10pmen t Oi s t r ict must be indica ted within the finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifica- tions to the finance plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. Subsection 5.13. Jurisdictions. Estimated ImDact on Other Taxino The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments der ived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. . Total Assessed.Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/85 Total $60,650 Lates~ Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, VocTech #916) $809,314,635 $294,571,383 $76,125,857 .007 .021 .080 $2,740,931,323 .002 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that each respective district will have over 99% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. ", ;.1._ . '- - :,:) The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build:out"as follows: ",_' 7' ....: --4 " >-.. ' <",'--' -.. ... 5-5 -:- Haximum Captured Assessed Valuation Maximum Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Fina ce District $10,062,715 $1,144,800 r Based on the curre t mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follow for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent Maximum Tax Increment City County School District #834 Other 28.801 27.586 50.548 6.880 25% 24% 44% 06% $289,693 277,472 508,433 69,202 Total 113.815 100.0% $1,144,800 The followin table represents the additional mills that would have to be levie to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax incre. ents for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived fr m the development alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing j ur i sdict ions were it not for publ ic in te rven tion by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for "the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new as- sessed value could eve tually permit a mill levy cecrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing juri diction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax inc ements may be determined. This determina- tion is facilitated y estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased 0 raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the a sistance of the City. School District County City Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment $294,510,733 1.730 $508,433 $809,253,985 .343 $227,472 $76,065,207 3.810 $289,693 *Tax Increment trict assessed valuation subtracted. Subsection 5.14. Modification of Tax Increment Financ- in Plan for Tax Incre ent Financin District No.4. As of April 6, 1985, no modificat'ons to Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. ~ 5-6 ^ . -:- .\ I " , . (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 is hereby modi f i ed to ref lect the implementa t ion of the master pl"an concept and increased project costs of Development District No. I as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsections 1.5 and 1.13 of the Modified Development Program. . 5-7 -:- SECTION VI. TAX I CREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INC MENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 Project Summary The tax rement revenues generated through new development in Tax ement Financing District No. 5 (Brick Pond Proj ect) will be u ed to enhance the quality of public improvements and to r duce the extraordinary utility improvement costs caused by an inappropriate subdivision pattern and incompatible land use. The Brick Pond Planning Area contains land-l6cked parcels (no street access) and commercial and multifamily residenti development next to a stable, single family neighborhood. Tax increment revenues can be used to reduce utility improvement costs in line with other competitive sites in the area. This will increase the likelihood for the area to develop. The need for a nei hborhood park and greenbelt buffer was identified in the Comp ehensive Plan for the area. Tax increment revenues will be used 0 purchase land for the park and make park improvements and to establish a landscape buffer between incompatible land uses. Remaining tax increment revenues will be used to upgrade and re abilitate downtown stillwater. Subsection .1. statement of Obi ecti ves. tion I, Modified Dev lopment Program for Development No.1, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. See Sec- District Subsection .2. Development Program. Modified Development Program for Development Subsection 1.1 through 1.15. See section I, District No.1, Subsection 6.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No 5. TIle following parcels located in the city of stillwater, Co nty of Washington, state of Minnesota: P.I.N. 9033-2360 9033-2115 9033-2120 9033-21~0 9033-2356 9033-2357 9 03 3 - 2 354 Owner stillwater I.S.D. NO. 834 Robert Brackey Robert Brackey Rose Floral Augustine Bros. Augustine Bros. Mexica1e FURTHER INFORMATION R GARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX NCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 CAN BE OBTAINED FRO~ THE OFF CE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection .4. Parcels in Acquisition. Properties ident.ified fl!)r acquis' tion will be acquired by the City in order 6-1 , ," ""j . . -:- - 4:) I I to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove' incompatible - .land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The City m"y acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in section I, Subsection 1.14 of the Development Program. \ The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be aC~Jired may be acquired at a future date: ( 1) The city may acquire condemnation or direct order to achieve the financing plan; and property by gift, dedication, purchase from willing sellers in obj ecti ves of the tax increment (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related co,c:;ts. Subsection 6.5. Development Activity ment Financing District for which Contracts have following contracts have been entered into stillwater and the persons named below: in the Tax Incre- b~en Signed. The by the city of (As Contracts are entered into with the city of stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) SubsC!.ct.i..o 6.6. Oth.er specific Development Expected to Occur wi t~hin _the .... Tax. Increment Financing District. The city anticipates that the following development will occur within Tax Increment Financing District No.5: (1) construction and equipping of an 81-unit multifamily housing facility; (2) construction and equipping of a 20-unit duplex residential facility; and (3) construction of an auto service center. (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this SUbsection.) . Subsection 6.7. Estimated Cost. of Project. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development program for estimated costs associ- ated with the Development District. . 6-2 -:- \1 I u Subsection 6.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted- ness. It is anticipa ed that bonded indebtedness may be incurred ln an amount so that $616,000 in net proceeds will be available with respect to this p rtion of Development District No.1. Subsection 6.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition cos s and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection 5.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the ity will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. \ Subsection 6.10. Original Tax Capacity; Estimated Captured Tax Caoaci tv. Pursuant to section 469.177, Subd. 1 of the Tax Increment Fin ncing Act, the original tax capacity for Tax Increment Financing D'strict No.5 is estimated to be $109,804 for the year 1988 payabl 1989, based on the tax capacity of all taxable real property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 5. Pursuant to See ion 469.177, Subds. 1 and 4, of the Tax Increment Financing A t, the County Auditor of Washington County (the "County Auditor") shall certify in each year the amount by which the original t x capacity has increased or decreased as a resul t in a change 'n tax-exempt property wi thin Tax Increment Financing Districto. 5, reduction or enlargement of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 or changes in connection with previously issued bu lding permits. In any year in which the current tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing Dis.trictNo. 5 declines below the or'ginal tax capacity, no ~ax capacity will be captured and no ~ax i c~ement will be payable to the city. Pursuant 469.177, Subd. 2, estimated captured District No. 5 at approximately $328,6 capacity value is det section 469.175, Subd. I, and section f the Tax Increment Financing Act, the ax capacity in Tax Increment Financing completion, 1991 paayble 1992, will be 2. This estimated annual captured tax rmined in the following manner: Original 1?328,622 Estimated T x Capacity at Compl tion, 1991/1992 $479,200 c.pacity* 150,578 Captured Capacity *Adj usted for See Exhibit VI- tax capacity of for the annual adjustment to the original ax Increment Financing District No.5. :.:;. ~--, Suhsection 6.11. Type of Tax Increment Financing Dis- trict. Tax Incremer t Financing District No. 5 is, pursuant to Section 469.174, su division 12, an economic development type of district as.defined elow: 6-3 '>:~ . . . . . -:- ... . .\ "Economic development district" means a type of tax increment ' financing district which consists of any project, or portions of a proj ect, not meeting the requirements found in the definition of redevelopment district, mined underground space d~velopment district or housing district, but which the authority finds to be in the public interest because: · i ( 1) it will discourage commerce, manufacturing from moving their another state; or industry operations of to (2) it will result in increased employment In the municipality; or (3 ) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. Subsection 6.12. Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No.5. In accordance with Section 469.176, Subdivision 1, of Tax Increment Financing Act, the City, with this economic development district, may collect tax increment payments over a period of time ending eight (8) years from the date of the receipt of the first increment, or ten (10) years from approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. The city will approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan on June 20, 1989. Therefore one defined termination date after which tax increment income. cannot be received will be June 20, 1999. No current development on properties within Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 will have taken place by January 2, 1990, the date on which the properties within the district were reassessed for tax purposes. Therefore any increase in taxable assessed value over the original assessed value would be caused only by an inflation value on undeveloped properties. Any captured value created by an inflationary value would produce an insignificant tax increment for collection in 1991. The City does not wish to accept any tax increment in 1991 and wishes to pass through any such increment which might be receivable to all other taxing jurisdictions within the district which would collect such increment in the same proportion as before establishment of the district. If the City, through the tax increment district, is not paid any tax increment in 1991, then the first possible receipt would be in MaYI 1992, from any value captured based on assessor's reevaluation of the property on January 2, 1991. Under the second defined termination ate, eight years from May, 1991 would be MaYI 2000.. .... -.... ._; '-:- "7', .."'. '~' .v< ;''>.... ._---. ._.- ~._~- . - .' Since th~.:.June, 20 I 1999 limitation is less than the period ending MaYI 2000, it is assumed in the finance plan that no 6-4 - (j -:- . ... ~ . ~cax increments will be received after the final property tax settlement in 1999. , ., Subsection 6.13. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on other Taxing Test No. The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assume construction would have occurred without the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No.5. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Tax Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal taxing jurisdictions lS $0 due to the fact uld not have occurred without the assistance llowing estimated impact of Tax Increment 5 would be as follows if Test No. 1 (the t met: Test No. 2 impact on the other that the financing w of the city, the f Financing District N "but for" test) was n ON TAX CAPACITY Entity Original* Tax Capacity Future Tax Capacity Captured Tax Capacity District % of Entity Washington County Stillwater I.S.D. #834 $124,572, 73 11,977, 02 41,116,738 $150,578 150,578 150,578 $479,200 479,200 479,200 $328)622 328,622 328,622 0.264% 2.744 0.799 * Adjusted for Infla ** Before Fiscal Disp IMPACT ON TAXES Entity 1988/89 T x Capacity Rate Potential Taxes Washington County Stillwater I.S.D. #834 Other (I) 20.931 24.016 49.666 5.554 00.167 $ 63,784 78,922 163,213 18,252 $329,171 (1) Ot.lJ.er taxi g jurisdictions include A VTI, Mosquito Control 'Di trict, Metropolitan council, Transit Commission, H , RTB, and Watershed District. Metropolitan Metropolitan Subsection Tax Increment Finan received with respec . will be segregated by its official books an Tax Increment Financing Account for in District No.5. The tax increment to Tax Increment, Financing District No. 5 the City in a special account or accounts on records. ,. , 6-5 . . . -:- ;" t l ; , . ~.~ , , Subsection6:15:~-Modification of Tax Increment Financ- ing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No.5. As of June 20, 1989, no modificatiort6 to Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. .. ;~ . ...-,'.~ J' 6-6 .. .. c t-. "' . . . THE BIRTHPLft,CE OF MINNESOTA TO: t~AYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROH: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1989 SII , u CT: MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT #1, TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #1 (SCATTERED SITE) ADDING THREE AREAS. B a c_~.g_r 0 u n <J..~_ This modification to Development District #1 '1Jill add three areas as sho\'1tl on the attached map. Site #1 is a vacant site located on the corner of Water and Chestnut Streets. The vacant parcel is surrounded by TIF parcels. An old commercial structure was demolished by the owner and TIF assistance may increase the likelihood of development. The other two sites, Site 2 and Site 3, are adjacent to, or are, parking lot locations. Site 2 is the Auditorhlm parking lot. This site is indicated in the Downtown Plan as a location for possible parking structure. By including the site in the district, TIF revenues from the site could be used to pay for a structure. The third site is land next to the City parking lot between the LOViET] Inn and Riverto'lln Commons. A portion of the site may be needed for the City parking lot and by designating the site TIF, revenues from the site would b e a vail a b -I e t 0 ass i s tin pur c has e 0 f 1 and 0 rim pro v ern e n t 0 f the lot. No comments on the modification have been received from the School District or Washington County. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Th-e -iilocrrrfc.a:Tlons- to the district are to help implement the recently approved Downtown Plan. The future uses of the three sites would be consistent with the land use plan and zoning for the area. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ,l'\,p p-roval---of--res 0 iiJtTOrlTfl1d-i ng mo-d Hi cat i on cons i stent with the Cornprehens i ve PI an. ATTACHMENT: Resolution. ------~-- Modified Development Program (previously distributed) COUNCIL ACTION: Approval of Resolution. CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MIN;~ESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439.6121 . . . tI " RESOLUTION OF THE STILLWATER P~~NING COI~lISSION FINDING THE CITY'S MODIFICATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRP...l'1 FOR DEVELOPHENT DISTRICT NO .-- 1 AND THE HODIFIED T2\X INCREHENT FINA.i'ICING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINi\NCING DISTRICT NO.1, LOCATED THEREIN, TO BE ~CONSISTENT WITH THE COHPREHENSIVE PUU~ OF THE CITY. w"'1-IEREAS, the City's proposed modification of the DevelopmE"n.t Program for Development District No. 1 and the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I, within Development District No.1 have been submitted to the stillwater Planning Commission pursuant to Minnesota statutes, sections 469.124 through 469.134 and section 469.175, Subd. 3(c), respectively, and VDiEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Modified Development Program, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan (together, the I1Planslf) to determine the consistency of the Plans to the Comprehensive Plan of the city. Nmq, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the stilhla;:er Planning ccmmission that the Plans are consistent with the stillwater Comprehensive Plan. Adopted: Septernber 1989. Chairman ATTEST: . '::':;rJ::7'17 --L L~'..' .. 1- MUl_BERRY ST. ~-1 I l I 1 -~--~, "fTrR I ~ ~ I [, '. '.~, \ l;::', f '-1, r~-~-- I r~-- ' I L___ I f\/lYRTLE ST. COMMERCl;\L ST. ~ -~~-f ~ ~ 25 I ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~b f ~ , )"'~ ._.n .~ib,','.l ~ 7\(\ ~ . ---l">l.i;"'" L,'<:f ; .,,~ LA;} \ ~ ~1~. t (ill , ',' 1- " F': ' ~; \:;.. tP "'~l !~ . ~'> 's .,. "- ~!. t'\ .o:?'r ~:) ~ -~~-'~ ,'...~ 1#, ~ p.$/ ~ -]~' ~ - /1'- :J \:~1 ~ ,$;:~ Ai,,} ,~ ~ j ef) _,__ --- (f) :-1 :-1 L-- CHESTNUT ST. r ., I - I ir".'" ~t ---r.1~t) l~ t ~~~~ j~~J OLIVE ST JJl ---- l-. -- --- II t;) , ;.\ ~,:' " . 'j '. ;' ...) 'i- --. I1ltlcJ O_~/ r~l / ~. :;\;,t;;l~'~ '< . , '~3 :,::: }1;~: t: ,. t,. ~."tlr> 'l,"'tt, ~ :;i ~i ':.;,.. l.,f ~ w~ !;~::;;I,:~~~ . C'T ,..-- ~. .DAVID MAWHORTER PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR iIlwater ~ ~ --- ,~ THE BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA . J EMERGENCY TELEPHONE: 911 STILLWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: SUBJECT: Chief Mawhorter . Sgt. Beberg ~~ Nuisance Abatemlnt (89-5517) FROM: .., DATE: 091589 I checked the origional report and the supplementals and the "Notice of Intentll which were done by Officer Ulrich. I had Ulrich re-check the residence at 309 East Willow and accord- ing to him some of the weeds have been cut and some have not. Those that were not cut are mixed in with what appears to be blackberry bushes. This is to the front and west of the house. I understand the City Council gave Steffan a time frame and what was to be done in that period of time but I don't know what that was. Pictures are attached for yours and the City Councils review. . . 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone: 612-439-1314 or 612-439-1336 I i. . . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: r illwater "~ - - ~ --- -~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 PURCHASE OF LIND PROPERTY AT CORNER OF SECOND AND MULBERRY STREETS At the Council meeting of September 9, 1989, Staff was directed to negotiate terms for the purchase of 18,500 square feet of land located at the corner of Mulberry and Second, currently owned by Leslie Lind. Staff has met with Mr. Lind and he has agreed to extend the lease of the land to the City for $10,000 per year for fifteen years from the original $15,000 per year for ten years. In addition to the yearly lease, Mr. Lind would like the City to pay property taxes on the site. The current taxes are $2,943.00. The taxes with removal of the residence are estimated at between $1,500 and $2,000. At the end of the fifteen year lease period the property would b-e given to the City. The City appraisal on the property established a $97,000 value for the site. The effective value of the land based on terms of the lease is $77,000, plus taxes. It is recommended that the City reimburse the seller for the City taxes estimated at $500 per year, but not School District or County taxes. With this modification to the offer it is recommended that Staff be directed to present this modification to the owner, and if approved by Mr. Lind, prepare the necessary lease agreement for Council approval. Money for payment of the lease is available from TIF proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: Di rect Staff to present counter offer and prepare necessary lease agreement, if approved. CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 '..:) u .IV h.90_ ., '< ~4 70 t h~50 I ---;.- ------ i.. _t:.~OO 7 //b .f.. 8'-1 20 1.3~ >T .362.8' .3'O~ Yep .~ 8 ~~~.~~ I;; /SO' 34/ - cOC)o 26 .TIt" R cJ jOc;3/ - 354-0 2020 2S PUMP "";OU.5e (;.9/_=_ . 41 t.O 2+ 3 ~ ~12 0.- 4130 - ... 23 4 ~ /0~9/ - 35~O --- -- -- ~'9/ - 4-100 i ze -- -l..Ot:..9/ - 3t:.20 .s ~-- ~ o Ii) , 'J t.9/- . -121 -1-070 /0t.9/ - 3680 ", IIJ . .., J._ '1J .. I 20 /.... / ...~.- t. I /.' / ':.~. ~~._ /7 ... .J' ~ ..: ..37/0 ~ ., . 091 - /3 c, f<j .' 9 t:, 9-.1. - . .3380 l\j /O~9/ - .3740 1< ~.9 / ~.-:_ ..3950 17 '; > .... y, ..: ~'" ,.-.... :. ._~. .___.__:'a__.___. . \ ~74-50... ~-o MULBER/JY -'.. 2/0' .33''' o. o '<l 3......._~~ O~.31- <?J5~1 r- 4 -. ..0. ~. IO~ 9/~"c21'o-4~.:~f:-; ~ l., ??S'. $'. .. , ...':: ~_L ~ ~~ ',. .r: .. 5'.; .:. -fo, ,. ':.'1,8. o I 93 ~ IO~ 97r: 2300 1-. l\12. /7 '. ' ,0 "-t--- "l ~.... . , ~ '---~9/- ,~/~ A L.L E Y. 24-...; ,o~ -j~.. : 0:.: .6 . "1:1 ' '.L J , -J: .' ......: \) lOt, 9/ "I . ' :..._--~~-_. Q '" ~o o . 0 (\/ Z330 N_ --=-~-_.:..~ 23ko 'l' . ... rt---2.0 I ... . , J,., ~z '.'.' .;2'.;'... 3: .. .', . 9 . . ,.t ~,.~ 0 ..-~~ .. O~., bo " 2.12 .47 '~20 .3 . J'.' . , "" ~. a.R4WTJ/ '"'<:-5.0.: . .. ,. "-. :. ;: . .... 'r \:~,. COM Me RC / ~ ~{~r',:'.'y; :.t., ." ~S"O I.. . : . ..-j. .. . '. , . H.'G;"l l?E'_e.~~~fle.t'...,.ii>.~A"'~. .:;':.'5;:~ l- \') . .':i . ""t~~;:I':"" . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FR: City Coordinator DA: September 13, 1989 RE: CONVEYANCE/SALE OF CITY PROPERTY The City has received a request (verbal) from NSP and the DNR to convey a parcel of land owned by the City that is adjacent to the waste treatment plant in Oak Park Heights. The DNR wants to acquire the land in order to construct and operate a public boat launch facility. NSP is also donating some land and preliminary plans indicate that the facility \-lill accowlliodate about 80 vehicles. It also appears to be a very worthwhile project in view of the recent closing of the Mill Road boat launch area. -- The property in question is shown in yellow on the attached map of the area. 'I'his property was acquired by the City by contract for deed in 1968 for $7,000. The property appears to have been acquired for treatment plant (TP) expansion andlor other related uses. Another parcel of land was also acquired at the same time, apparently for the same purpose. However, \'ihenthe MHCC was given control of the TP all properties owned by the City for the TP was conveyed to MVlCC (see attached Resolution #4530) except the parcel now in question. It appears that this parcel was inadvertently excluded from the transfer of property. As you know, the City was compensated for the transfer of the facilities and properties by way of a credit against future MWCC service charges. However, I have not been able to determine whether or not the City was ever given credit or compensation for this particular parcel of land (even though it was not conveyed). MWCC staff are researching their records to determine whether or not we were compensated. I raise this question because it may have some bearing on whether the Council "sells" or "donates" the property to the DNR. Hopefully the MWCC will get back to me by next Tuesday's meeting with some information. In any event, I have placed this matter on the for Tuesday's meeting for Council discussion. I can discuss this with you in more detail at that time. 1t llUWLlul.i-.!l.i uUU ul!1!UJ..llLL:U uS iI.eLlll'::) C.LLy C1..CLh dllU HeL.lll,:! l..l'_j RESOLUTION NO. 4530 l-\dopted by the Council this 23rd day of December,' 1970.. Published: December3l, 1970 . Attest: In 1'1~~,,-,--Z-J City Clerk A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF TREA'l'MENT .WORKS TO HETROPOLITAN S BOARD. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the city of Stillwater, as follows: . 1. Minnesota Laws 1969, Chapter 449, Section 5, authorizes the Metro- politan Sewer Board, at any time after January 1, 1970, to assume ownership of and require any local government unit to transfer to it, anyexistinginta ceptors or treatrnent works needed to implement the Metropolitan Council's comprehensive plan for the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage in the metropolitan area. The Sewer Board, by its Resolution No. 70-105, deter- mined to assume the ownership of the treatment works and necessary appurtenan thereto owned and operated by the city, and directed the city to transfer to the Board all of its right, title and interest in and to such treatment worko and appurtenances. The Metropolitan Council, by its Resolution 'No. 70-521 approved the acquisition of the City of Stillwater's treatment works by the Sewer Board. 2. The city of Stillwater shall transfer its sewage treatment works and necessary appurtenances and the property on which the treatment works and such appurtenances are located to the Sewer Board as of December 15, 1970; and the Mayor and city Clerk are authorized and directed to execute all deeds, conveyances and contracts necessary for this purpose, including a contract similar in form and content to the one submitted to the Council at the meeting of December 23, 1970 and on file with the city Clerk. Attest: j3t~xs-c~ City Clerk Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of December, 1970. Published: December 31, 1970 . )8.9 /.J i..I . . . RESOLUTION NO. 4150 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISI'l'ION AND EXCHANGE OF LAND. . II BE l'r HESOLVED, that the Hayor and city Clerk of the City Hinnesota are hereby authorized and directed to execute a the following described property to-wit: of_stillwater, conveyance of, That part of the Chicago, Hilwaukee and st. Paul Hailway Company's 100r foot right of way (now abandoned) in the Northwest Quarter of the North~ east QU3rter of Section 3, Township 29 North, Hange 20 West and Government Lot 5 of Section 34, Township 30 North, Hange 20 West, conveyed by hTarranty Deed dated August 7, 1884 and recorded on September 4, 1884 in Book 15 of Deeds on page 39 .and by vlarranty Deed dated the _ day of June 1884 and recorded on June 28, 1884 in Book 14 of Deeds on Page 432; which lies North of the South line of Mill Road, which South line is parallel to and 297.91 feet South of the North line of said Section 3, and South of the following described line, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Gov't. Lot 5 where the same is intersected by the Easterly line of said right of way; thence East along the North line of Gov't Lot 5 for a distance of 378.8 feet; .thence South at right angles to the North line of said Gov't Lot 5 for a distance of 776.8 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Southwesterly along a line drawn perpendicular to said Railway right of way to the j-C.esterly right of way line thereof and there ending. to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation and to receive from said Northern States Power Company in consideration of such conveyance the sum of $7,385.00. BE IT FUWrHER HESOLVED, that the Hayor and City Clerk are authorized to pay to the Northern States Pm.Jer Company, a Hinnesota Corporation, the sum of $7,385.00 in consideration of a conveyance by said Northern States Power Company to the City of Stillwater, Hinnesota of the following described property to-wit: . That part of Lot Five (5) of Section Thirty-Four (34) in Township Thirty (30) North, of Range Twenty (20) West of the Fourth Heridian lying Easterly of the Easterly line of the right of way of the Chicago, Milwaukee and st. Paul Railway Company (now abandoned); described as follows, to-wit: Ii, ' Conunencing at a point on the North line of said Gov't Lot 5 where the same is intersected by the Easterly line of said Railway right., of way; thence East along the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance. of 200 feet; thence South at right angles to the North line of said Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 100 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence East along a line parallel to and 100 feet South of the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 178.8 feet; thence South on a line drawn at right angles to the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 676.8 feet to a point of intersection with a line drawn perpendicular to the Easterly line of said Railway right of way; thence Southwesterly along said perpendicular line a distance of 6 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly line of said right of way; thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line of said right of way a distance of 382.8 feet more or less to the point of inter- section with a line drawn at right angles to the North line of Gov;t j Lot 5 and passing through the point of beginning; thence North along said last described line a distance of 338.31 feet more or less tOIA tIIO POi11t of begii1ning~ DE IT FU!(TIJER RESOLVED, tha the Hayor and city Clerk are authorized to execute on behalf of the City of Stillwater a Contract for Deed for the purchase of the purchase of the following described real estate to-wit: 2E . 'l'hat part of Lot Five (5) of Section Thirty-four (34) Township Thirty (30) North, of Rante Twenty (20) West of the Fourth Meridian, lying Easterly of the Easterly line of the right of way of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul paihlay Company (now abandoned); described as follows, to-wit: Cormnencing at a point on the North line of said Gov' t Lot 5 where the same is intersected by the Easterly line of said Railway right of way; thence East along the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 378.8 feet; thence South at right angles to the North line of said Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 100 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South on said line drawn at right angles to the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 676.8 feet; thence Northeasterly on a line drawn perpendicular to the East line of said Railway right of way a distance of 152.6 feet more ot less to the point of intersection with a line drawn at right angles to the North line of Gov't Lot 5 and passing through a point 136 feet Easterly of the point of beginning ,as measured along a line parallel with the North line of Gov't Lot 5;. thence Northerly along said intersecting line at right angles to the North line of Gov't Lot 5 a distance of 607.7 feet more or less to a point thereon 100 feet South at right angles from the North line of Gov't Lot 5; thence West parallel to the North line of Gov't Lot 5. 136 feet to point of beginning. . and agrees to pay for the same the sum of $7,000.00 payable in three equal annual installments without interest, first installment to be paid during the year 1969. Adopted by the Council this 29th day of October, 1968. Published: November d, 1968 0..../' (=:tJdu~.~~2C/ Mayor Attest: (/~-Jl/~- (r\_.~J City Clerk -,-,' . ! -' - ",:T I i 1/ Iff ~ ;1 1, .;', j /IS \)~ I / j ,if ',~~,I "l / ';. '" I '/ "". d /1 #' j,/ j;. { ;' / I ~,/ i ;j /. I j? . ao///} ~ },0Y /// ~Jd/ h; ,,,~ ~- r-;;;;;~~; d '/' :/" ., j' /f ;/,:- ,b., ".1' ' ,;,/ '~..J /~./ .0' /,/ ..:.) 1 .' 1*0' c. (c:f ; " ~~ it: ~\ .~ . /;,~n~!" '!;l~ '. '1;. _ ' ""~ Vi Q" ~ < ~'''' .\- ,,,- i ,< . . '~ . ,)it.: LLr " ,J \J.' ,,,-\- . ~i' '0 'ci.',~ '.,.:d . ,,,~ ~': ~ r'..::} "[j'.. F // r ."~" i-)': .j)' - , , 1...J "-.) <:;;.. .. . 'i~, ' . 8 ,) q::L :') ':.-'-;:"l.'~ ~. ., :;__ C-l- . ,C'j ~ I:' ....->' ',.'+- I' .:> :-;, "~I " ~ ~ I' "- (" , 7' ') 1 0 /' '\":1 ~}'77~"" \ ;,,"."~ 2 ~. ~:t/ ,'8'"~ ". " .,,' . ;!,' ~\ ,n::';!';' '~ ,d.. /' // h' '. I ~ ; ,'i<- c 'V --....;r't 'm~ ~, 'f,O~" // / " ' . ,'" ,,' _ I>' ,-"~ ' ~ . '/r ~' I.. II~' ('.K> cr-p ..7t5"'" ~ f-.~ I 'v,.- t/vJl' c{J") " ' ' ~, , v, , " '" ~ · ." __ _~ 0/7 . . ~v 0 OJ rJ ,1 ",. ,,~,'YH.,,_' -'iC) .." . // 3 pA" I .'" ., .' ':; , "-.... .,' y W~LL,,".U."";'?- ~') -,""', /00- r- ' / "+',,:~11;: ~:., ." ,>;:~~'t~:~>':J~>""~~ '// j/ c~~' I~;'" '.'/-;1' I. 'II ~',.E' ,~-Y,OO,'r7 ' "1.,1'1// . '~~' . ' ' ,~ ,.-C"" '.. u' ,. ~.., < . ..' '-{I' " --'-"""" '--. ..If? " ,'," , '\l ',/,. I . '. .'''-- -~ "d' OXI'" " . '~/ ~.>lQ' '~:i~ ~J ". > {, " !(,,\~:' : .~, ' ,'. , ; t-.II"~) ______,'. ,,'p:;;<,f!. " ;." ! .. .~~/., I .' I ff. ~i,' . ',' '.' ' .'.;., t \. . . . .~ "" f"'" . ' , ~.' \.0, II . , Ie. r'" · "" .' .' \ l"~ ,~.....;~~'I-~T'~': ~.- """,,.,1/ ' ~,.,,\.>,,' '\ , ," " \. ~ " . . ' .. . .. l \ 'f ~ " , . ". ';" . \ .' ,," ,~ . ~l"i \/' ,. ~ If. \) ./ ,,1"" "'~." : . ,,\, .~~~'" . / p". , . ,". . ... ., '." ,__ . . ~I' , l' L" ~" . / " . , ".,' '''j'' \" " '< t--... "::: \ <- " .,,' .''';' "", ... ~ ~ . ~ > ~,. \.... . /":' . ~1,.I"""<c". :;;~" I. ."'1_.. '. '.~ 'c"""'"' 'l- ~/ v' , . .'"' , ,',\, ',~ ~ .'. " "'" l ,0'$ t :,-_, ,j r ') I' :: \I~. .-1.' . .:. ~ ?;j:.., ,. '.,' ~"'.~I! ~~~ \j' ,."X' . ~< "':.\ '" ,,:.;,::>" ' ... . ",'v,', ",' " " , ,"" ,,' . ~' , '~'<'< .: ': '~",<';:~}-l ~:;>~'" :: .:,,:' ':' ". ,:, ':;- ,.' .. ,..' li/1.~ . ...,;?, \ ", ':. ': \ " .r", ' .,! , I;. , :' ;,.,,' ': '.' . . . ",..' . :",;;,,: ."R ' ,..;:: ."", ,'" ',. " "...;': . ," . ., '. '," " '~'~. . '..-:;::?- ',/ t,:'} , ,:~.." \' \'"~' ,:"'" ' ,,:., " ,..' ,. ., . . " '/"1f; ," :." /:. .;'< 'I'.,... t) ,j.' '. ",,', ,,' :', ..' , " '".,; c' ';y' ~J ~. i,: ',' ::. ' "', ..."",;." i' ,'," .' . '''' .' "'"'-~ '. /" "," .,,,,,,' ~':; :",~~ ;.r ,~:_ ,F :,/".,:.,}'. " ; '-J;. .,. I'i' 'Y0.o'.' '\' .' . .' ,,"';k <. c;,.' "', :,,;C"..,' ." ,,,I. "",;. ,,.' " ' J"""~" .,' "rr "# N' . ",,\ ' ,/,,!.. ../,'" . \'," ,c', c/. . .', ,', L" " ,'. J"""" . ,"" '6'\"~""'""? · . "., .., ..."",,,', J. " ,..'>" . .",', " .,. 'c' ' . " ," ."" --,', ,. ,.".' . ,.",...\I,.,;..,.,.."',"'~'" ,., ...,' ,;.,' .,' .".., "~' .;.'; " ,.,. '.' JJ..;" " \1, ,.:,,,~.;., ,S ~'i'~ ,,;,,' , . ,", .,; , ",; '" ;,"';-' .'" ," :.' · , ,,, .:" .,'. " ' , '.' ,.., . .. ,,'f' 'vl,...,...",.,....-",. ;1,. ..",',"', " '",', ,,' .," . . ; :':~;: ~!:'k~; ;;t;~:\1fi{ ;:~.' .~;;;~,:;~\.:,';,~,:~':,..i~ij,K }';'<. e'l': .f:::,},{i;.:,. } " .. ,..' ','~ . '.. .,: ,,' ,_.'::.\;1"::. " ;.,,' ,t,; 'v ~.:..:..",'.;' . ~,.,,~"t' ".' ,,'-T ,'(t~~l~',',~\;.~.I: \, ",:: ' '..; - > . ~" ~ : . .";' ;- ~~.. "] 1~ V, ~\2. "" ,J ,,~ ,~~ j~~ ~ ~ ~Vj ;( ~ J .., j I I .~ t " I I i I I /'" ",\ . I . 1 f I I , (fj' ... () Q'D \ .() ('() ---:-7~:LJ2:" ( 'J-- '0) J,~ " ,. I ' ! I ~ : '.~ ~ : '",' . I" I.: i .. .' ," ,',', ~ >- , \:l ;,,'- . 'I,' . I ",: , ~: .. ~~ < ~I .0., -I ."';5(0 ""') .~~ I ~~~ ''''-'---'L<>'~P \- ~.'~'''.~ , . \), l:Z). ..,:)0 \ ~ .~" :; -!,', .O:;.--:!:.l- .0- -- .r.......--.... . . . . " . ., /' '., !J (" J ....I"'" I~' , ....- :::" ",'" ..... f ,Po! '.(",5, --' - -'. ,.,.:.} i, .,_1 ,:1', J d~'(r iI' " -4 . " · +\....l~.........'~'n~... ~.. 2"~;1 f' ~)Ci l j' '-'j, . ~ 11 V ',t,.r " . TJfl,S M1Ui;E1'JJrr, f.\ild(;: !lad (!:llt~J:r~4 l.r. to 1966, bv nod biZhll.lfln \"O,'R'I"!"iT1!U srp/,'1'TCz' 1'.JNrT:";' -J" -..,n~. lit, I.......,....,.d;" ~J\.J.,J.,Jy .,{'J..,)Y'l'D.t1 , ~ " ." doy or~J;.f~1~;:' r.;.._, ". I ~> I i!J OOI'pc:retion un4crtho lnwlSor thj [Ji;oto of Htnncl3ol;,(l, hSiroino1'tct Culled "~1\, ond C22X-~~Il..,. tJ mUhidpiJl C';.\q)Ot"utirJhl iloshir.gtcll COlJJ1tY, N.1.ntH:sotu1 hCl'':!ilwrt~i' ~txU6d "City'''' WITiiESSETll) That N.'.1rl ~n {JorlCidctetlon or thG" oove.nontnl'll.d, /lereOrll(/n~S of Cltj'} hQ(UAI\tJ.!:tatccntllilled, he.::"cb~' $ells end ~erl3lHI tP;~~i1Yt?J',u.l1t,o, Ci tl', i ", '~l);: ' . . .:'.:: ~' . I . , '. . eucccooors o.nd o;Joiel1tll th~ 'I',rooil'l of, 1u/14 lying end bdngin t,he COtUlCY of : , :: ".,F'~'.<:,;: /','..-:<,;:', : . HOE)bin8t0!1) !:ind State of;' }lin.n~l.).ot~1 d~l;IQ:d,D~d i!lS to1101-13, tC-}dt:" , : . . . . 1-l,l1;f:'~, ':: .. . . . . '.,. . 'i'h(,t pc..l't of.' L{)~ F1. v~ (5) of S'~ct~or\ 'l'Id.l'tY~fOlLt' (34) in'l'c'tftlship ...... '.n~i.rty (30) 110r1:.)1> of R~lns:e ':l'\;(?nt,y (::0) 't{QlJt of the FctlXtn 1<lo.ric'liDn, 111r;g 8o.!ll:e';,"J)' or the Eoaterly line of tl:,e dght Qf '.{O~ of ttl~;P ChicDSO, KU1HI\J}\(;1,"; l.V1cl. St. i?eIJ,l RI):U't" Company (now noo.rlrionoa,) .... do.oc:ribcct fit! [oHolo/G; i;o~wit: . ';'J,.; .....'.'i .' Comrnendng ot 1;1 point on the North lin~ ~~.( S~~d I'\~Vl t Lot 5 where the "tlm", 1\1 lntcrl3e~t.ed by th~ EIl5~erlr" H.rh, ~J.r Ddd Roi1\-1cy dE;llt of \-I~Y; tbcncG B(JQ~ ~,tQ:1g t.llt:. north lino of Gov't Lot 5 8 diotQnce of 378,8 fmat) thcnc.? Go\.\th at right M.sles to the Northli)i~ qf G~lr;J, OOY'\, 1,01;. . .. 5, II dltwtuncc of 100 f~ct to t.he point or beginning of the. tiBet to bo d~BQr1b0d; thenc~ South on said line drawn at:: riGht; nnglf)(j t~ the North 1~1lO tit CliV't l.ot 5 a distllIJce:., ;:; ;.' of 676.8 feet; the~ce NortheBBtcrly OM ~ 11n~ druwn ':~~G pr.qn;nJtculcl' to thQ ErHJt H11!!: of $f.l.h\ Red lwoy dght of . ..' 'Xuy 0 (HebJ!1,,~ vI: .1j;,;.6 r'i't;'l~ rn9t"':: <J.r ,l,(!llD to the p<;l~n~ ~.( . int~rGcci;ion \-lith II J iJl~ dl'Ll"l)i i'lt right ongl()s totht:' . li(ll't.h. HJ1c <::f Cov' t 110', 5 dnrJ PI/Dill r1g tbrClueh e 1:':J1 nt 13G fcot EOBtody of: tile pc.lnt of l:0gil1l1.tng as met:lOu.req alone {J line' pc!rullqJ \.Ii thi;,h~ NCl'lll J.1n~ co( Gov't Lot 5;' thGnCQ Northerly D1cna ucld lnterS~Qtins lino ot right <welGe to th"J NCJrlh U.t\IJ oJ:" C,Qyl t telA $ {} (l,ietenc~ of 60'( ,~( t;<;ct mote I;I' lCSil to u point trlcn,OII 100 [eet SQuth ot dGht fJl1ljl!!s from th~ Nurth line of.' Govtt Lot 5; t.h<;,-~o"Yk6t'PQrI)Uel to the No;-th lint;: of Oov,it Lot., 5, 136 feot to p91n, cf be3inning. ;0' liSP she 11 COIIYO,y to Ci t,Y by ;"otT()nt.y D:::c~, I the. abOVe! d<:3Cl:'i br:d p~~mil)eS:l.JUD()III~ ";<" ' . ~,','. .:' >:i, '.'" ,1 " .' .' ):>un~od by 1.In I\btlt.l'cct Dr 'f!. He for ~xC\l11inl.1.t.i<:'Jt1onl:t, evid~n,l.iin8 good t.i ~la ill :.'.",',.1 the l1/,1rTiC of' lWP.. nU upon tho prom}Jt and r.ull p~~'for'mMco qy, CJ. t./ 0,(' i te. p:;,t. or thh UI3,rOCr.l'::ht. ....,! tIne. Cit,)', 1~1 cOMid<Jtnt;.on or the pl'O:::lllifl.cl'J, hncby vgrU{'\:;J t.Q P,\y H$X' ilL ita nf\tlJtd~"~l<1 Off'1.<':Q u(J 1))\0, r':l~'t,I,\" l)llt~h(\u<!; Pl'f(:~ of culd prcmiooo} the 131.11)). ~lr .scVl)il ThoUJ,lonc.l onu Ik.;100-----~un(,$'r,OOO,OQ) iA,Uoru in ti1lU:\.l\;.:r tlnd ut tirnao . . following/oil vithout 10tcruGt, to-wi~: ;t"'djj.jj 10m (U" L,:!,ol"'c. l'/UVvm \,l(~:r 1, 1 ~.)(J \) ,t,' ,jJJ, .\.1 \111 WI' l)c>'J'ot"<1 Novarnlh')I' ~/ l').f I) $;',JU. JII Oll t~r '-'v {'\Jtu NQv'':(,~Ut'r 1 . l~n t;,. I, . : I . {J. ,I . ,I," , . \ ~ I. - ~ ~.\ .~, u W i\R PAlITY DEt.'J ~ . \~ ""- THIS n:OEllTU1\E, JIAde this _\~ - da.y of 0...\'-" '-' ~ -~~ t:OKTI\EP.N STXfr::S F(MER caWANY, a corporation tl..'1der the lEl,',./8 , 19J c-, of the State bet....een of Minnesota, party of th~ first part, and CITY OF STILU/ATER, a }RL'1icipal corporation, 'vla3hinl:ton County, S:ate of f/.innesota, party of the secOl,d part, the 8\1::\ of One Dollar and other vu.luable consideratJ.on, to it in hand paid by the 'rilr.;ESS}~rH, That the said part.y of t.he first part, in consideration of said party of the second r~~t, the receipt. whereof is hereby aC~'1o"/led~ed, does h'Oreby Grant, E.ar;oain, Sell and Convey unto the said party of the second part, its successors and assiCns, Forever, all the tract or parcel of land lying and bein~ in the CmU1ty of '..Jashincton, and ;:tate of l~innesota, described as follo'''/s, to ..'it: That part of Lot Five (5) of Section Thirty-four ~)~ in Township Thirty (30) !lurth, of Rance 1\lenty (SQ) ',lest of tile Fourth i,<eridian, lying East- ,-rT:': of the Easterly line of +_\1e ri"ht of ,,/:;.y of the Chica"o, !,\ilwuukee f111<i St. ?aul ?ail'''/ay Company (no.... ,De-ndoned); descyibed as foll()',./s, to- 'Pi J ~ . Carrlcncing at a point on the North line of said Govt Lot 5 wher~ the same is intersected by the Easterly line of said Rail'..l1J.Y richt of way; thence East along the North line of Govt Lot 5 a distance. of 373.8 feet; thence South at right afl€les to the North line of said Govt L:Jt 5 a distance of 100 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence South on sa~d line drawn at ri>;ht. angle" '00 the I10rth line of Covt Lot 5 a distance of 676.0 fcpt; thence NortheasterlY or. a line drawn perpendicular t~ cne East line of said Fr.i~,"'l.Y right of .,,-ay a. distancf' ::-1" 152.6 feet. more or lesa to the ~oint of intersection .ith a line drawn at right 6.1'.gles to the North line of Svvt L:Jt 5 and passing throu"h 8- point 136 feet EasterJ~' 01' the point of beginninr.: 9.S mC9.surcd along e. line p'u~.:l.el '..ith the llorth line of Go'rt Lot 5; ~hence llortherlY alvru;; said intersE.cting line at right anr;les to the North line of Covt Lot 5 a distance of 607.7 feet ~Dre or less to a p::lint thereon 100 feet south at riGht anJ;les from the llorth line of Covt Lot 5; thence '..Jest parallel to the north line of GOyt Lot. 5, 136 feet to point of begifu'1inr;. \~ t; - 1-< . 7 '- appurtenances thf'rew1tc belonging, or in anY'rise arrertainin0 to thc said party TO HA'rr: Alffi TO HOW Tlf": 21'J'\::, Toget.her "ith all t.he hereditaments and of the second part, its successors and assir:ns, Forever. I'.nd ti,c said northern States lWer Company, party of the first. ptirl., for itself and its successors, does covenant "ith the said ptirt.y of t.he second fArt, it.s succe~~ors and assi':TIs, that it i~ well seized in fee 01' the lands and precoises aforesaid, and ha3 good right to llell e.nd convey the same in oanner and fom aforcstlid, and that. ttle sa:"e arc free from ~ll incumbrances. ('1 " .../ --- ._ ---'r' --- i t. Q ----A, \ ~'J l.~r) \ l - ,-r~,t. I' \.-" l' 'I. ':-' - .. \ \. \.,' ' _ -,' , ' ("i, ._ II ',", !d1" l'J'itN\(,'e,J.Dr;t Jv}-~r\ c,c. - J J- ,,-, .,~=~"'"==. ,\ \ -p (,v\.,C,(/vCt>L( 1:L.\~thLC t) )27t (J v (/ f 0 0 '- '( \. ..~'...:' ) rave 1 of 2 .J . "", 1 . r~ G .~-,,___..-Io State Deed Tax Due 'creon $15.40 l'\ ~, .14 And the above bargained and granted lands and prenises, in the quiet and peacea.ble possession of the saiQ party of the second part, its succes~ors and assigns, against all persons la'..rf'ully claiming or to claim the ...hole or any part thereof, subject to incwntrances, if any, hereinbefore mentioned, the said ,arty of the fi rst part \-lill ',Iarrant and Defend. Iii TESTn\OIlY HElc7,EOF, The said first party has caused these presents to be executed in its corporate n8..':1e by its 'lice President-Engineering and its Assistant Secretary and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed the da.y and year first above written. In Presence of: NOR'Tfu:RN STATF:S PJ'rl""ER COHPMlY BY~V..J-~ Vice President-Engineering p j , (f ,] f !2!:-~1,. / (~~Y--U"t1 (j j Q C~! /, ~J<2C~, ' ., (i .U \'\\ f ' '\~ And 0"".C'~,_.1....l-) ~ M'N_ AssistC\S1t. St-:cretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF r~~ffiPIN) On this .LlJ:i.... da.y of (a/~a.a.--?', ' 19.24-_' before me appeared Arthur V Dienhart and M'RGAR,T W -,nl qfu ' to me personally kr10'.m, \-lho, being each by me duly S\-lorn, did say that they are respectively the Vice President- Eng:,neering and the Assistant Secretary of NORTHERN STATES KAlER CCNPANY, the corporation named in the foregoing instrument, that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that said instrument was executed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and said Arthur V Dienhart and ". - . ',:: rl r! .;'~I' _ acknowledged the instru- ment to be the free act and deed of the corporation. a<l~f~ bh~1.~ (Notarial Seal) PEARL s. DUGGAN' Not;Jry PubliC. Hennepin County, M!nr'J. My Comn\l'~.ji0n Expires. June 23, 197ft Page 2 of 2 . Form No. 9-M. )Pn1lU61a ~l~~~:.r~~:"<;;-;a~t\~"~~~:~'" ~il,~~;, -, ----------- -------------M-.r- - .. .-.-~~I~@[p)J 3J nbenture, .lfaLr~ thu...............___.._ ..?l?# ....... day of.........!),fc;;;:"11e<"... ]9i?8. ~...~..l~..~:mutt'... t1rbis lJ~tlrt~n a corpora/wI"> uruUr 0,,, law. of tlu. Stat~ 0(.. !Jl'1~ .......................... party vt th~ first part, aM i5Hitntll"ll"ctb, That tlu. said pam, of the fint part, in. con..sidaatioT> of llu. .urn of. CUe ~...~..~~...T~...~~.._....................._...._.........._................... ID.l1:1lLI ,!K. to it in. Mn.d. paid. In; th<:. ,aid. parry of the <ecnM part, llu. reaipt what-af u lu.re/;Y ackTliJwlcdecd. doe> Iu.roOy Oran.t, Ba.rtain, Sell, aM Conv0j U~/<) llu. laid porn) of 1M ucond part, U. s,",;eu.lOn and a.uit1t4. ForCV<<1", all t.h4 tract........ ar paroeL....of land lyi"t and Ixint in tM CClUltty o/...~.._.... .. and s~ of .Mu..~I<Ow., ducri.bt!d <u fol/<;",", to-wit: THIS RJD<:Z IS A . ._.. . PART m \ ':h:;e pure 0:' I.e.1: :i'le i 5) of Se,~tlon.. T:-;i~.cY-fO~ u"~ A:O ?o:~.r:s:::? \ . ~H1S. ) ~'::.i:-t:.y (~0) ::O~~;~, 0:' ~'idl1<3e ':'",'en::j (cO) "'jes~ c:. ~::& .rOt.:..:::-::':-. ....:.':~--.;.l.~;~J',~'STf\.:_,J\\cNT ~Jln~ =~s~cyly 0: ~hc Z~s~erly liue of t~e ri6~~ o~ ~aY 0: ~~e C~1icG.Go} i,::.lw'ut.../..E;c lli""1a. St. ?aul n<:ilway Cc::;p~""~y (r~o....' a'~a:r.c.o:-~ea); cescribea as ~oiloW5J to-wit: ~ 12':0 : bdongi <vcr. A parnJ ' iLt 'UCl: ri~ht t in~um..J fio'A 1 ~ Cl:.mpm be:naI c:xn or S':rI!~, . ~c1pl.l COl"pOI:'1IU=. ~~. ~~V.;r.~ll~~'1>~~~.!:II$-.I,ll111:1r-f~P.-;r;C)tll,te ol.........~_. , party of iM sc:cQnd part, Co~.encing at a ~o~n~ on the No~th ~~r.e 0: $ai~ Gov' t. Lo~ 5 \.;here the sa-::e i.~: i:1te:sec"':~,i oy :':-.e East.erly :'ine O~-, said Rail,....8y rigtt of '..:ay;- ~;le=:ce East along the north line 0:"' Gov1t :''0-:' 5 a tii$t~ce of 200 feet; thence South at r~gh~ a~blQS to ~~~ North li~e of said Gov1t. Lot 5 ,1 d.istc.::,:e cf lea feet to the point of begi~~ing of t~e t=ac~ ~o be described; thence Eus~ along a l~nc pa:allel to and 100 ~"'cet. South. of the l~ortt l5.ne: 0:-- Gov I ~ :..o~ 5 a dist~~ce of 178,8 feet; thence So~~h on a line drawn at right angles to the :;o::::t~ ~i=-!e 0:" GOy't lot 5 a dist~~ce of 676.8 f8cc _0 a po~~_ of inte=section with a line draw:: ~rper.aicular to ~he Easterly lin~ of said Railway righ~ of way; thence Southwesterly alons said perpendicular line a distance of 6 feet more or less to " po::.nt on the 2asterly line of said ri&~t of way; thence ~orth~esterly along the Easterly line ~~ said rig~t of way a distance of 382.6 feet more or less 1:0 the point of intersection with a line drawn at right allgles to the North line of GOy't 101: 5 nnd passi:-.g thro~~ the point of beginningj thence ~orth a~ong said last described line a distili,ce of 330.31 feet more or less to the point of beginning. ~(v .1nd U", abovo barl!aLlUd and l!rantcd land.t and pr<n<is,,-', in Ih~ qu.i.d arn! ~accablo ~...,swn. 0/ tM laid party 0/ th< second part, it4 r=,on and auil!n..s, al!ain~t all ~rso",' lawfully daiminl! or to claim th~ wMI<: or an.y part llu.reof. .ubjcct to i""umbrana~, if any, h~rdn.lxfor~ m<:ntwnui, th.. laid. party of tht fir.yt part ".ill WalTant and Defond. o ]n 1!c.alimonp ~bcreof. TM taid fint party 1u:w cau.ud th.ue ]Jra~nt.f to bl: eJ:tCU~ 0- it.! corporate n-ame by i14 .::;.L~:',n!l'f.~>~... (t'~I"f1I'l..r. /'. ,.,;d".~ and it.. .~...:5.fl:.R'pA~ ... ..... and if. corporat~ 8<C'L to be he,.."nlo nffi_t.ed III. day and ymr fir.,!. abouc u:rit/tn. JIIlH.n=oNI ~ roma C~-W' ----;;., '.q ~q..q... ....... ..... /...... .:..-c.......... Cc '-- - .--y- By.. ......... ............ ........................q.....~..... 1" Pre..n.cc 01 1 ~ / ( [~-.=~7-~;/~"p~".;..)<',.j ...........N.~.\2\...f.~~.. l"S7~-'v- ~ . lu..............._......~.,.................... 1'=(----,-"--.(jJ0-L~.: '~. (J1~~!.~~c...<,/~r;.~ . NSP if) 1 -tt--vU:x,<..aA.Z @ ~, :: '( 3 SS I (')\) Cc:V\~~~. YoMw ~ e.. 1 :12 s ,u.n/<) For- pari, /000 .. all 131.- -.1 ~ l~ , ..a-rO ..-/-"-'\ () .to t-~'1~<:- I" . LIST OF BILLS EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 8160 .' Action Rental American National Bank A T & T A T & T A T & T Best Products Company Board Water Commissioners C-Aire Capitol Electronics Carlson Equipment Company Catco Company Century Po~er Company Clarey's Safety Equipment C. A. L. E. A. con/Spec corporation Coordinated Business Systems Croix Oil Company Croixside Press Department Labor & Industry Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff Equipment Supply Inc. Fred's Tire Company Gannon's Auto Body Good~ill Industries Greeder Electric G & K Services Hard~are Hank Junker Sanitation Service Junker, David R. W. Kirchner & Associates Kr iss ProeJucts Lafayette & Associates Lake Country Chapter Laser Impressions, Inc. League Mn. Cities, Insurance Tr us t Linner Electric L. N. Sickels Company Magnuson/Dieperink ' Metropolitan Waste Control Commissioner Meyer Se~er Service Miller, Leo Mn. Animal Control Assn. Mn. Cellular Telephone . Concrete $ Paying Agent Fees Long Distance Calls Lease/Rental Leased Equipment Refrigerator-police Replace Hydrant Repair Parts-Compressor 20 Pagers ~ 199.00 50 Face Shields Throttle Cable ASSy. 2 Mo~er Whee Is Safety Harness/Rope Manual and Binder-Police Router Bits Mte. Copier-Police Oil Scratch Pads Boiler Inspection Legal Services Repair Air Conditioning Tire Repair . Re pa ir Squad July Expenses Lift Station Repairs Uniform Rental Supplies Garage/Lift stations Reimburse-Belts-Vacuum Appraisal Reports #251 Degreaser Appraisal-Do~nto~n TIF Seminar-Zepper/Rylander 7 Plaques Workers Compensation Florescent Bulbs Crack Filler Legal Services Se~er Service Charges Pump Brick Street Lift Reimbursement-Shoes conference-Jacobson Mobil Phone 209.50 1,190.50 68.05 113.70 41.04 149.99 1, 293 . 80 32.97 3,980.00 19.00 38. 14 68.00 239.00 20.00 802.80 259.76 140.95 20.00 10.00 47.50 13 8.02 16.50 546.42 552.17 588.00 751. 52 147 . 80 385.00 1.80 3,500.00 107.94 850.00 200.00 245.00 26,458.50 81. 60 2,371.70 6,952.65 61,403.63 240.00 49.99 30.00 10.80 Mn. Dept. of Labor/I Mn. Correctional Fac Mn. Correctional Fac MTI Distributing Corn Northern States powe North Star Turf, Inc Northwestern Tire Co pany One Hour Express pho 0 Oxygen Service Compa y Safety Kleen Corpora ion st. Croix Animal Hos ital Sherin, John Short, Elliott, Hend ickson Snyder Bros. #16 Stafford, R. H. Wash ngton County Treasurer Stickan, LaDonna Stillwater Area C 0 f C Stillwater Book & st tionery Stillwater, City of Stillwater Ford-Merc ry Stillwater Gazette Stillwater Photo Stillwater Towing T. A. Schifsky & Son Thompson Hardware Twin City Testing U. S. West communica ions United Building Cent r Valley Auto Supply Valley Trophy Center Van Paper Company Viking Office produc s Warning Lites of Mn. In::. Whitledge, Claudia W. W. Grainger, Inc. Yocum Oil Company Zep Manufacturing Co pany dustry lity lity any Company ADDENDUM TO BILLS Amdahl, Chris American Linen Supply Beberg, Byrdie Cleveland Cotton Custom Fire Apparat s Earl F. Andersen & ssociates Glaser, Stuart Seminar-Kriesel Design Manuals-Planning Misc. Printing-Police Tune Up Kit Ice Arena Cylinder Sheaves 4 Tires/Battery Film Processing 2 Gauges for Air Bag Parts Washer Agreement August Charges Reimbursement-Meeting Engineering Film/Battery/Supplies Section Map Reimbursement~Supplies Seminar-Kriese 1 Office Supplies Utility Bill-Runk Property Trunk Latch Assy. Publications-August Film Processing Move Car-Myrtle Street Blacktop Supplies Soil Tests Services Pump Can Rack/Tr.Lumber Auto Parts Key-Mayor Oslo,Norway Towels/Toilet Tissue Office Supplies Paint/Signs Shoes Electric Motor Gasoline Hand Cleaner Service Call-Re-key Linen Service Typing Towels Pump-Tanker Signs Mileage 75.00 271. 20 188.00 45.37 3 , 815 . 96 60.00 341.32 17.63 22.30 160.00 225.00 10.00 18,634.70 177.15 ~ I I. 5.00 7.67 8.00 224.81 91. 3 5 20.50 624.97 17.87 20.00 883.68 275.39 1,267.50 1,259.36 33.47 629.37 31.46 233.95 212 . 14 57.45 49.99 19.57 856. 14 13 3 . 7 9 41.50 15.60 62.50 151.41 57,497.00 13 1. 6 9 . I '. . . . .. Hooley's Supermarket I. B. M. corporation Jim Hatch Sales Company R. W. Kirchner & Associates League Mn. Cities Mn. Conway Fire & Safety Mn. Municipal Board Mn. State Fire Chief's Conf. North American Life & Casualty St. croix cleaners Seim, Gordon Stillwater Area Economic Development Corp. Uniforms Unlimited U. S. West Communications Valley Trophy Viking Office Products Dish Soap Mte. Printer,36,Stations Lute Rake Appraisal-crown Life CLEAR Dues Jump Suit Filing Fee-Annexation Registration Hosp./Medica1-Johnson Laundry-Fire Mea1s-Seim Star city work Miscellaneous Uniforms Services Plaque-Lions Club Supplies Adopted by the Council this 19th day of September, 1989. APPROVED FOR PAYMENT 18.32 153.00 49.63 700.00 170.00 92.56 100.00 315.00 75.00 18.20 16 .3 2 5,000.00 253.20 496 . 14 45.46 32.75 . . . Belisle Trucking & Excavating Rt. 2, Box 496 Somerset, Wi 54025 Rudy J. Lenz 3045 No. McKnight Rd. Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Western Excavating 565 No. Ferndale Rd. Wayzata, Mn. 55391 James E. Anderson Rt. 3, Box 85 Cambridge, Mn. 55008 CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS September 19, 1989 Excavators Masonry & Brick Work Excavators General Contractor New Renewal New Nev.f ~ . r illwater ~ - ~ --- -~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J TO: DATE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL STEVE RUSSELL~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 14~ 1989 PUBLIC HEARING ON CONSPICUOUSNESS OF BUILDING ADDITION LOCATED IN THE RIVERWAY BlUFFLAND/ SHORELAND DISTRICT. BACKGROUND: FROM: SUBJECT: With the recent change in the Riverway Bluffland/Shoreland Ordinance~ the construction at 120 lakeside Drive requires a visual review for conspicuousness as viewed from the St. Croix River. . By setting the meeting for October 17th, adequate notice can be provided as required by City regulations. RECOMMENDATION: Set public hearing for October 17, 1989. ATTACHMENT: letter from Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella dated 9/1/89. . CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 ~. . BABCOCK, LOCHER, NEILSON & MANNELLA ATTORNEYS AT LAW 118 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 TEL: (612) 421-5151 EDMUND P. BABCOCK LANDOLj. LOCHER JAMES M. NEILSON FELIX A. MANNELLA ROBERT F. MANNELLA WILLIAM D. SCHUTTER GARY T. LaFLEUR THOMAS D. MOTTAZ THOMAS A. KLINT STEPHEN j. NASH GREGORY j. HELLINGS COLE EN J. CARLSTEDT.jOHNSON DEBORAH L. COTTON RANDALL J. FULLER CHARLES W. PHILIPSEK NORTHTOWN OFFICE NORTHTOWN CENTER 117 NORTHTOWN DRIVE BLAINE, MN 55434 TEL: 16121 786-0250 BROOKLYN PARK OFFICE VILLAGE NORTH CENTER 7621 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD BROOKLYN PARK. MN 55443 TEL.: (612) 566.7118 September 1, 1989 Steve Russell Community Development Dept. 214 N. 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 ~ Re: Alan Rousseau The undersigned is attorney for Alan and Patricia Rousseau. As you know, a situation has developed regarding the addition to the home they purchased in Stillwater. During the course of that matter, the ordinance regulating same has been amended by the City of Stillwater. The purpose of this letter is to request a reconsideration of their plans under the amended ordinance so that it may be determined whether the addition meets the visually inconspicuous concept. In addition a deck on the property has been reconstructed. While we feel that this work is not subject to the ordinance since it meets the visually inconspicuous concept, we would like to have that resolved at this time also. Would you please initiate the necessary council action for this and advise us? Thank you. A~ CYJJ~ ~lix A. Mannella bn '. cc: Mr. and Mrs. Alan Rousseau . l. . 4?, /Z./ /'9$9 ~//tft/4h/' ~7 c:c.4/P,7c/"/ Z/~ ""'~ hu/",-LA f~ <"-r{ /. . / d, ,;/'l'J//fc/" #.x/ / ./ / ~ .// ..:..-&'.-;> c: .s. :}?:' &' e /,/>,,,-/ C ~1 d f/' ././ / / /' c:7,'iJ tt//>/~~";Jo~~~~ k/L:;/ ,~- L"7';;.(/ h~e. V~L///c///~' / Cc./7.5 / o{;/, /!C"c;-:/';' ~,. ~;7 ~y ,3' 0/ (.1/:40' ,/'7"'1; /~ Pc': tut:? /' v-:/" -: /~:~:/" /:"::1::' /~~~{:-/~/ / #E?~1 o~/ 2c::c ;. ~~,.:5.;~ //~ dC'",,,,,,,.;' / 4'M 6'$.64y -h-/' 44 4''(-;/J.1:fn<'4/ /'J' ~.k ~/// /5 /4~/.L' /~c.. /t/o-/f/' k/$d.1c:. /1/4$ 4CT/lc1/Wfd,* .,/. . ./././. /: L / / /~/.9'/-? C;V~//;/9' 4-kty 4't.?/? vVr/e- qVC:: 7"'/' 0',i'J L.///C.;f' C"c.r-.d?-<" /~'<2.: /,;-) // /t-I4+/' /--j.c7C', /""';t::>; ,.,.;.,./f<:;/,r5-C::1/,,7 ~~/~/,7/~ ~~'/;."lkc;rC .c-i ,;~;;/,? 5/1 ~'t-/J:7 ~C?C/~/fC ~~6 ~.o.k: /l'<./.5 ,/~ /*c.. ~4L -/ ... ~. / / . ,/ / . / L./ / - /6//////19 .~:9c:.. /7/e-rc-/'~ /t"~/./v/7 /.: /C?c.p..."--/c /// /4f:::;. C:::::/'cUv/ .;5;:v0cc L/~/''~/' .4;~ ;.{f-~//~~c;'/ v~~ ??//'.~;~: /~/~/;'c7 /t'b/~r , ,- / ' . ./ '/ ~ <,'/ ~ // ;... .4/ A //- 4/t?.5 ~/$/ v.c4l''<//7 ./,;;:'.. /" r/7"e.. f7/'~.v/'7d "t/4c~-r .-;fe.v&::.//,:-;';. - //7:7,; / /7~"t/? e;;//c ~;c>L c ?}/t7:~::::5 /'/ /llj/ a/d ~/' ~//-~ ,:{;"..> _..(/~ ////c/ ~!... /..t /" / ,/ /, /' // // uc/' /"/('C- 41Cr1r~/5" tt/~/c::..* ..:?..~c."'Cf/ /~c"U/ 4j1d./C// T'/1?e y~'1'//~.'/'c";:',:;~ / c:2#d/'.~""/{'-/-/-;'::'/J1 /;1~'/'//7;-;r// c/~-;'.//'//'::7 ,h!;~Zc/ /l'/lc'.t' v-2.//7 e /' '/" / >> /' / .,"" /' '- r~ ,//1 /"':-.-:-1.-'/"/'~ k/._' ./J.--o,,;;. _7 ~,.-;''':;,.a ~-" -".J",; ,//~/? .//.._c: '7'""" /~/7 /7/ ~...-~ t,;."V_'/ '-"./ f -'.;....- ,. -'="'.'C/"~""/_ ___ ' ~- .///_/ _ r__~ ~/ .v - ..,V / / /.;', , ./ /{YSL"/c;. T5c'l /<1 /....,..{~ $// /?f~k./ ,tYc J7yJ~c7Aj/ .t3-1J-;7'/f::"C:/"":7/~c--C. ~To ~~J'; ~~""ct~~' ~4 (~ >l"~,.l.it...~( ~~ \J $' <f~() ~.s. U) CVJ..,t4. ~""""'-""~,,<.R , I. J n $.Y "- '"-<{ ~ +0- 3,\ 10 ~ ~\. ~'-~ .~ l~ 0 _ ',J- .'0 l ~ L 1 0 ~~p(~ ~L(~).~~ . --r- u...-4--0~. ). Ll/VLt'-t ...$p?c::~rt!~. . ./:;& ! / ~ . :/,:, / ~" :(i4/~~c;w ~(' r:t.", cbE $',/ / .; I ~/-1t/qr:..r .//;;7,A/" ,/ t:lVAl1lJ OF WATER COMMISSIONERS ~- Tltlnl_ / S,;_. M",- "I~~ UUI! WHEN !tENDERED AT OFFICE 01'. BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 21M """" Tltlnl _ ; SIlI_, M"'_ . v ADVANCE MJflUMUIlIt AMOUNT I 766 . f I I , f I t : j I I PReVIOUS ADVAHC~ MIN'MUM A 849 83 689 766 77 83.00 OV MAY 1'89 83.00 77.00 OV APR 1189 77 KEEP THIS PART Of' !I11.L FOR YOUR ReFERENCE KEep THIS PIllRT OF 81LL FOR YOIJR REFeRENCE" 'AD-ADVANea MIN_ . OV-oVeRAGE Fl.-FLAT RATE SS-SUMMEFr SERVICE SP-&PRINKl.eR HEADS TX'-SALES TAX AR-ACCOUNT RENDeReD MS-""SCELLANEOUS 'AD-ADWlm;a MINIMUM- OV-oVERAGE Ft.-FLAT RAT!' 'F", au.n.r Fo//owing 0... of Biff ' ':~seAVICl!" SP..:.sPl'IINlCLER He'AOS TX-SALESTAX ", ~RENDeRec MS-MISCELt.AN~ .FtH auM,.,. FOII~ IN. 0# 8i# , -. 'f' _. .... .- ~'ft' 811.1. DUE WHEN REHOeRED AT OFFICE 0" BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS 21M _ Thiod S.._ / SIll....... M__ t86.00 OV JULY 1 t89 186.00 BILl.' DUe WHM RIIIIOCREO !;,T 01''''3 0fI". . BoARD OF WATER: COMMISSIONERS, "~e:'",.ous, ADYANCI! MfNIMUM. j I [ i I Dick" thera must. be a.: leak in bldg. " I /A:PTHI9 PART OF ~3lI..1. FOR YOUR ReFe<leNCE ~ t ..4,O-,.\QVANCi- M'N~UUi\f t OV-oveAAce FL.-FLAT RATE t . 'F", eN_ 1'""_ 00,. af :~'f,~ eVlOUS 966 1152 186 '''~~' ;.:)::.;.. ~ ~-.: ...~ ,~ .-:, . ;"....",.. .!: ~'::;--:'~. ,-". ~-' ',N' .~~.... . :"'~;; , ..-'..;. .'.~ ',,'~ "'~' . ''':''-" ~SUMMeR Sei'l\lICE Sl'-Sl'RINKLER HEADS: TX-SAI.l!S TAX AR~CCOUNTRENOEREG MS-MlSCEllANeous. :-:--_'"""'''''''':J'''''''.:' '''D-AOVANCE !\I1"IMUM, .':. oy...;oy !!RAGe' .c. Ft,;4LAT RAT!;. 'Fcr, au- "~Da..."t_ -.--', . - -,. ~" ~ svrca:,': ~iNl<UR HEAOS ..-: TJ(,_s...tE~!A.'t "'. '. - ~,'-.. -'~ '- ....:: "..' .'C ..~., ~}~" ~.:::~- ~ f~,'~_ ,',,-"'.; ~~':: .-~.-~.- , " 91tl. 0lJli \~.Rl-"eo.AT 1;lF"IClt OF. 8OA~D OF ~ATfRCOM~ISSKlNERSf~, . 2IM.-TlriniSv_f~.~:':., . , ,~~"IH~:, AMOl. \.'. .,-.::~! , , ',.'" "'~',-" "<'.'~ .. n5~r ": ~'-'''''-'''''''- . ...~ - :"""-"'..:"-,,-.-'" . t223' ---:'"~ lJ;.~:.:>/:>;~:~( ~.~<~~~'~~f.~j:;:;{ .,;, ,.,~._", .;j,I~'-'.""~_.~.'.cw.'"", -7t.0() .av- "..- . . .... ........ "'+\c7';;~"~~l~~ ,. .,.,J.. """""'" '.,,~ ,-""':', "",'". 'QIi W__ "'..........".~'...~...Q bit .....t...I... .. 1111 It. t ..............,...1<'-'_...... .........'...................,..... .._ o z ~~ ~;.~> ",.0: III 1 .~ .. , . " . 'f) . t- f-o : rr~' ~n 7..:l ~ >\~~;l :: ,- 1.0. ,.. · ~l :: :~: nt: . . '-'~1 ; ! \ ..~ ~1ld . . '.f ?;}:n ~ r., '.. ~'! ~ ';A ~J J: ~! , , ',\ 0: 0 (...: :,; \: _ \ <i C\l wi ~.~ ~ ~ . .J :! 1 k :' :~ ;, 0:,) Ill. Ill" ::II', :J. ~' ." . : . ': ,. ,,- . '. . . Iii :! . ,,-; . .'t: '.:)-.: iii '" ;; II: III t- III ~ \ \' '-v \ ' . \ t, T---. ~~ J- t ~~) \r ~ ~ ~r\r\,~ \'~ 1'-" r\.~-'" l' \ )' , ~.> \ '~r-......../ -J .--..... ---. \~ ,- 1"-.. LJ \ '; N -:-~ \. j , ('l 'I $"'\ VI '" a: ~ 2: l.LI a: .,,~(\ J- ,-'" ..., ~ l.~ ()). \1- {'i t-- ,--(., ..... \"- \ n J-- -::- .::-- (,- '", 0 r,,) 0. \--<.., f' \r f\, [, , " "'~-. $ "'<',,9 '" :z o ~ l.LI a: .-__ __ I I .r, <-" 1"1 , "..l ...;; -, '\ /....... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- cc ~ a: l.LI o ~ l.LI a: ~... ) , - ~ to: rJ- 'd(. 6q '-~ ~ .. .~ <:r ~!" r,.., ff'j ra !..t: ~ \ " .\ r~ ~_;\ (') ;:;: \.J .,,_. - fd ~". (;:) ~2 '-"'- l.LI ... ~ o r..- f."l , ) ~5: ~:s ~~ \5[ "''"')\;;..:, ~: <( ~ < I- U (... D.: (C <:1 ......~. :::;l,-.LI- :2 <J ~ _ "~'-__' ~'N.........''4I!Il!I''..,,','.--...,_..,..._._,._" - _..._-_'._....__'._.4,'''_.'_.~.~ '0"<,." ...~....."._.._._...."._, QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL CITY OF STILLWATER 216 N. FOURTH STREET, STILLWATER, MN. 55082 :5RD GTR 89 SEWER CHARGE ARREARS REFUSE CHARGE PRE-SORTED FIRST CLASS MAIL U.5. POSTAGE PERMIT #206 CR '-<IL TY t RICHI~r.:It 224 WILDWOOD LANE NAPLES FL 33942 B28.60 3RD (~TR 89 43.95 200 , UTH TH:r.Hl~ ACCOUNT NUMBER TOTAL D'JE 01-00425 872. . I RETAIN THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS . RETURN THIS STUB WITH PA'IMF:NT ..... ''-'" f.l. ...... U) j :!' ~ ,,\.., : 1', 11/ VI o II: .J I~ III :! " iii III r I .J a. .-.. a. :J VI .J . a. u Z :J :l: cr ,.. D' .- o u . >- III .J II: <( o ..; . ...... C! Q . 1 '~~r,'f-~ett,4: CY~~':_~r?~ :3 />~~ ~ A-<1~hJL k jk. If/.::k /lz}, c~/ ~ /W/..~~_~ ~~ ~ 1~7;~a:~:1ttt< ;7'L ;t;J2,~ ~,~ ""7 ~7~M ~~_~ ~. I~~f ~t!N." 1ft 4""P,. ~,,~- ~ z~ 7 ~ · ~fi:-d~~. ~#-~ ~-e.;~-I:X~~~~ ~ -;td" /~: jY2~ Ad: '#:? ~ - ~ H ~./-- At-,e-U-.;:(;it.- AAI-'.<W\.. po. . ~.:&i ~ . . ~ i /"'1 or -f rf /_dbv-~ · -_.. ~..."..__. ,,". f~.~>e-~/?7/~V1/VL~h~7! _. :;tj;u~0#~ j'-.~':I ~~ ~~ ~::tll",-ilt J,pLaz~:? ~ ~ ~ ~ a/l.L . . ~/-rv 7/dt~. ~:. J '!-L ~ M. ?t~~ ~ ~ . ~-~~A ~~/V~ ~ ~'>. . k~ 'AI...::t r..... ~.t':/~~ 7~. y~ 7'1' ~0-/n '.o!-." "..",,,..'~.~.~'j"',,,,,,,'~_~.jIO . f?jJ(1.f ('A 5"., 1""'. i! II ~'" ;, I \ 'H".' 1'\' ';' v t ".).:.~ I 't ::1 'i J'f\..(j;,.t.^:, .,..1......' .', .'~31t:J~J ./. ",. $, V. "~-,-df). ...(\~- tv'(+-'t-~lL .~.... ..,-. It;..".~, " \,;'" ,,'. " ; '. B,(IXJ ,J ~i.~P,q,.(t:J-.~.(~l.. " ',',. i\; ',: ',' ,~t'. :'" (':, I & ~ \A.J',,~.~I:V AJ' ~~iq. (.07"'^'~'~';.'0*I~~_~., .:. . .', ,..', " t.., , .' ,o.'jI A \~k~\~>~>.i~ d.i..{;At,u.~~\:" .. n. ..' ."i' .. -. . J~I,IJ . [.1.) ''1\ :^^\*",~,,^.,.\.,\ .. . .. ., ft " ,'.,. ': '. ("{' ~~ 1\ .r~; {\ . P t(f..f,~' .' .. , '.sf( . ~ r' t\. ; . /. . (' A \!' . l~,t c- :.';.~ It) 0' ( :'llt- If ()~ 2:< 2 :;:'d.: .' . '.'l iI' ~c'v~-~.~"O)eA"t . .bJ'~j l,.,jJJ ,,{ , l: 6 '.2 . . ir: ~ .~ ::>., . ~.1~'X)..\ ft.t... (~)TQ, " I " \.i~, " "j , ", , (\ 7r ., . .' .. '"rlJ"'1/ ." I ',: .'.r,.\I..r!~.'I."\ \ \"". ~\.\ . : '<1~" O,~', '. ......'.. . ' " t " -.... .,. : '~.tI(J.~J\~ n (: ('h I. I . 30) . . ,!" I "::.', , II '. '. . .' , )17' . :I.) 'q. t.,; '.. . , ",::-; ::/) Q '. ..t. l'~ . " " . . " .- f'v, ... , '. . . It A... \.\ I >,,) I. ,'\ . 'J.. ';( l~'''), "..1 .-,j~, ' '. . . . . . . ','. '- . .,~ "1 i t{... ..};.. (' \ '. " " .:" i~,"" \.. '.1' i'l iI'~ I . .'':-' I' \ 'r . 1" .' ," .J I i. . ~J ~l, ,(' 0 . \? - . '.. ,t7'\ oil . ,. (\.~.} i, \'(1A1f (:(;;.1 .... j",: :' y '- ,"",i( /~_ ,\ D\ __....__. . . ( ? ~,7' '\." 1., v . . ,. . ~-l \~~1' ~ f C'") (" ,~~I~. ':> Q (1 .' .,Q!pD "I j I .;....'",\' . . ",L..~,.~.!___.~~ i,I' ~ ) QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL CITY OF STilLWATER 216 N. FOURTH STREET. STILLWATER. MN. 55082 2ND QTR 89 . seWER CHARGE ARREARS REFUSE CHARGE 211.20 43.95 121 N. GREELEY ST. ACCOUNl NUMBeR TOTAL Due 255. 15 13-00365 , RETURN THIS STUB WITH PAYMENT I RETAIN THiS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS \ . . C--/ PRE-SORTED FIRST CLASS MAll u.s. POSTAGE PERMIT # 206 CR RIDGWAYt MARK 121 N. GREELEY ST. STILLWATER MN 55082 2ND QTR 89 121 N. GREELEY ST. ACCQUolT NO TOTAl. DUE . 13-00365 255.15 ~. .. . BILL DUE WHEN RENDERED AT OFFICE OF BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS _ _ ThirdS.... 1 Stil"'..... Min_ PREVIOUS AOVANCE MINIMUM AMOUNT 215 307 92 10.00 AD 82.00 OV APR l' 89 92.00 ~ S-/;.I /<(1 KEEP THIS PART OF BILL FOR YOUR REFERENCE .AD-ADVANCE MINIMUM OV-oVERAGE "L-FLAT RATE 55-SUMMER SERVICE SP-SPRINKLER HEADS TX-SALES TAX AR-ACCOUNT RENDERED MS-MISCELLANEOUS -":}r OuM'tIH FOIlowmg Oar. of Bill \ . BILL DUE _EN RENDERED AT OFFICE OF BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS _ N_ Third S..-I S_. Mln_ PI_ raNnt this stub to insure proPer c:redit to yout account. ADVANCE M,,,,IMUM AMOUNT OATE AMOUNT 307 342 35 10.00 AD 25.00 OV JULY 1 '89 35 .00 JU L Y l' 89 35.00 KEEP THIS PART OF BILL FOR YOUR REFERENCE .AD-ADVANCE MINIMUM OV-oVERAGE FL-FLAT RATE SS-SUMMER SERVICE SP-sPRINKL~R HEADS TX-SALES TAX AR-ACCOUNT RENDERED M5-MISCELLANEOUS PI_ __ lIlY _. tion of belanat tented before receWing this bill. . For au.rw FoIlO'IIIfnf1 0.. flf Sill '. ) . , / L/ t.; ,~. ~ t: RILl ,j VI .'\ '( 121 :1 G22SLSY ST 13 S T ILL 'N A T S R :H :W 365 . Date Remarks Reading Difference July 1-90 Apr. 1-90 Jan. 1-90 Oct. 1-89 July 1-89 .. -< . 3 5: / '., - (Apr. ~-~s..:.r -- ,1/c(~2 '>. -!1,'=iv:,..; lot)EI / -,"I' .. '- - G - 1/ ;- c. Y tf / Jan. '-89 Oct. '-88 I / .., 7 1 ! b i '^-- , I P / J./ /' ~7 July '-88 ~? // (Apr. 1-88 "- \b .., /~/ (50) -.J / ,,;,... ~ ....... -- Jan. 1-88 ./ '..j 7r7 / (. ""...' I .' Oct. '-87 ? 3 1 j"~ - - - " ' , 2../ July '-87 '. f ;' ! ~ , ? cA; -, '\ . / 7 /(3 /)./., Apr. '-87 7' ~ j ~ ~ . I Lj ~? Jan. '-87 L .... .,. , /' ...)....... Oct. 1-86 7' ., ','/ ,;". ~' J .. -, / July'-86 1 ~I 3 I / . . . .. . o KOLLINER'S r: / ,. t" C It./ ,-,,-- tl - ( 1-y/ 119 SOUTH MAIN STREET STILL WATER. MINNESOTA 55082 (612) 439-4433 September 1, 1989 Steven Russell, City Planner City of Stillwater 216 N 4th St Stillwater, Mn 55082 Dear Steve; This letter is in response to a recent conversation we had concerning the Downtown Plan Action Committee to which I was appointed to some time ago. After much thought and consideration I am forced to submit my resignation. My schedule has changed recently and I find it impossible to clear my schedule on Thursday afternoons, the day that the committee has found most convenient to meet. I heartily endorse the agressive way the committee has attacked the issues presented them and realize that you need active participants which I cannot be at this time. Good luck to you, the council and the committee. If I could help in any other way please feel free to contact me. s~t2rS~J Ed-St uart ES/rj . September 8, 1989 Mayor Wally Abrahamson City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Popeye's Noise Pollution Dear Mayor Abrahamson: . I have spoke to both Mayor Wally Abrahamson and Mr. Nile Kriesel today, Friday, September 8, 1989 and on one other occasion in the past regarding the noise pollution at Popeye's on the River. I also informed them of Popeye's negligence of removing the awning by the Labor Day deadline, as of this day it has not been removed. I have made numerous phone calls to the manager of Popeye's regarding the noise of music and general noise of the audience on many nights of sleeplessness. As a result they pacify me by turning down the volume for approximately 10-15 minutes, and then it returns right back to it's original intolerable volume. On one ocassion I was approached with profanity. I called Popeye's a women answered, I asked, "Could I please speak to the manager", her reply was "F Off", that was a very uncalled for response. --- I have also had the occasion to call the Stillwater Police Department to register a complaint of disturbing the peace against Popeye's when I received the usual game of run-around with the manager of Popeye's. The latest disturbance was Wednesday, September 6, 1989. It is now the end of summer, evenings are getting cool, our doors and windows are closed, and yet the music still is annoyingly loud. My wish is to keep the volume down so it does not continue to carry for miles. In other words, keep the bar noise downtown not in the residential areas. Thank you, ('f\.~ ~ Mrs. Marie Jahnke 1024 North Second Street Stillwater, MN 55082 . c: Mr. Nile Kriesel . September 11, 1989 Mayor Abrahamson Stillwater City Council Enclosed please find a letter as we have presented it to Washington County officials as we continue to pursue the installation of a stop sign on the corner of South Third and Orleans Streets in Stillwater. As you know, residents have been involved in the effort for this stop sign for some time and we believe that you have received correspondence as well as verbal requests in regard to the matter before. We are once more calling attention to the request because we feel that it should continue to receive consideration and any help that you can give us in our efforts is greatly appreciated. Thank you, Ronald and Jean Schad 1345 So. Third Street Stillwater, Mn 55082 August 22, 1989 I ~ I \ '1fv,. 771 ~ 7rl Mr. Dick Herold Mr. Don Wisniewski Washington County Highway Dept. 14900 6lst St. N. Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Sirs, We are writing th.s letter in regard to a very important matter connected with th current construction project on South Third Stre and Orleans Stree in Stillwater. We, along with se ly that a four wa Third and Orleans many residents to forwarded it to C ceived is that th reasons. The two minimum of five a that the county a eral other residents in the area, feel very stron stop sign is necessary on the corner of South Streets. We have presented a petition signed by the Stillwater City Council. They in turn have unty Officials. The last information we have re- County has denied the request for basically two reasons given were that there has not been a cidents at the intersection in one year and also tempts to move traffic, not deter traffic. We wish to disagr e with .both of these reasons. There have been several serious a cidents at the intersection recently. What if the "sixth" accident in a year's time resulted in a fatality? As to mov ng traffic, we don't think it should be a priority on Orleans Street. At one time, Orleans Street was considered to be the city limits of Stillwater and was almost rural. That is no longer the c~se. The intersection is in close proximity to an elementary schod~ a day car facility, a clinic and an athletic field. There is a great deal of pedestrian traffic as a result. In fact, children from Oak Park School use the int rsection as a school crossing four times daily. We have lived on t years. During tha of tra~fic on Orle as a more expedien the traffic conges have increased als With the widening bad situation get We urge you to con now that construct residents who see matter particularl thousands of dolla elected officials. e corner of the intersection in question for 23 time we have noted a great increase in the amoun ns Street, due mainly to the fact that it is used route out of town by motorists who wish to avoid ion going through downtown Stillwater. The speed and we have yet to see the speed limit enforced. nd improving of the street we can only see a orse. ider our request for this stop sign, especially on is going on. It is inconceivable to us that situation on a daily basis have no say in the in view of the fact that we are being assessed s for the improvements thrust upon us by our I I It \ Sincerely, }_ ~~ y..~ '>BC.L..vL / 3 '-I ~ ,..J $-J .>(/r. ,--iJ Ej/~ a:ti.. _ hLA-. :,-.. 7J c-_ WASHINGTON COUNTY REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION . Consent Ca1endar nMI! RI!a. September 12. 1989 BOARD MEETlNG DATE AGEHOA ITEM NO. Public Health De artment ORIGJNAnNG DEPARTMENT fSI!RY1C1! I hi ) - l, '.... REOUBTOR'S SlGNATUREIDATI! BOARD AC110N REQUESTED The Board is requested to adopt a resolution author- izing appointment of an Administrative Law Judge for the purpose of hearing on license proceedings against Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. REVlEWI!D BY IDATI! BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION On August 11, 1989 the Public Health Department issued a notice of license suspension to Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. for that company's license to collect and transport solid waste in Washington County. The licensee delivered a notice of appeal to the Department on August 22, 1989, pursuant to the Washington County Administrative Ordinance, Number 36, and requested a hearing on the matter. The 1 icensee also requested an extension of time prior to the hearing, pursuant to Section VI.B. of the Administrative Ordinance. Section VI.D. of the Administrative Ordinance allows appointment of a hearing examiner to conduct the hearing. Consistent with past. practices, the Board is requested to appoint an Administrative Law Judge to conduct the hearing. To accommodate the licensee's request for a time extension and to fulfill the provisions of the Ordinance, the hearing will be scheduled no later than November 20, 1989, which is ninety days from the date of the appeal. . PR~OUSAcnONONREQUEST/OTHERPARnESAD~SED Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. Gary L. Ganrud, Faegre & Benson City of Stillwater City of Bayport City of Oak Park Heights COUNlV ADMINISTRATOR/DATE ADMI o AlPtNM. o DIJU&. NO AICOIIfftJIIMTION SERVICE: BUDGETED: fUNDING: 08Jl!CT: DATeJT1MI! RECEIVED BY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FlNANClALIMPUCATIONS: t .,. NO L.IW ~ COMMENTS COMMINTS REVISED 5/89 BOARD OF coum aJltISSIOIIERS IfASHIJl&'Ullcoum. MIIIIIESOTA RESOlUTIOI 110. DATE DEPARllDT JIIlTIOI BY COIIUSSIOIER SECOIDED BY ClJIUSSIOIER BOARD RESOLUTION AUTHORIZI G APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE WHEREAS, on or abo t August 14, 1989, the Washington County Department of Public Health served up n Junker Sanitation Service, Inc., a Notice of Suspension of Commercia Waste Hauler's License, and WHEREAS, the licensee has requested a formal hearing on the suspension, and WHEREAS, the see requested an extension of time to hold the suspension hearing to 90 days fro the date of service of request for a hearing, and WHEREAS, the Minn sota Office of Administrative Hearings has trained legal staff available to act as a hearing examiner for said proceedings, and WHEREAS, Washingt n County Ordinance 36, Section VI(D) authorizes the Board to appoint a hea ing examiner to conduct the license suspension hearing, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. That the Minn sota Office of Administrative Hearings is appointed, effective retroactive 0 August 23, 1989, to appoint an Administrative Law Judge to act as hearing officer for purposes of the above-named license proceedings; 2. That said he ring be held no later than 90 days from the date of service of request fo a hearing exclusive of the date of service; 3. That the act ons of the Washington County staff and its agents, including the schedul ng of the hearing in the above-named matter and actions related thereto, are pproved and authorized as actions of the Washington County Board. ArnsT ccum ADMINISTRATOR YES CHAIRMAN. coum BOARD EVERT (YACMJ) lARICII MdIJU.Elf SCHEEl. I i =1F , . WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.Q, BOX 6 . STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55062.()()06 Office: 612/179-5401 Facsimile Machine: 6121 779-3900 DIstrict 1 Russ Larkin District 2 Sally Evert District 3 Phillip R. McMullen District 4 Donald G. Scheel District 5 September 12, 1989 Wally Abrahamson, Mayor City of Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mayor Abrahamson: . I have received the City of Stillwater's resolution #8132 which addressed the matter of suspension of the solid waste hauling license of Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. It appears from the text of the resolutIon that the City's concerns are threefold: that the ten day notice of the suspension was inadequate for the City to prepare for alternate hauling arrangements; that the method by which the City was informed and the manner in which the County investigated the issue were inappropriate; and that the City is concerned with the County's Administrative and Designation Ordinances. I will attempt to address each of these concerns. I recognize that ten days is a short period of time during which arrangements for an alternate hauler could be made. In fact, the ten day period provided for in the County's Administrative Ordinance is ten working days; the notice to Junker Sanitation Service was served fourteen days before the suspension would have become effective. In any event, had the suspension not been appealed, the City would have had to make alternate arrangements in a short period of time. We have taken this criticism of our current ordinance provisions seriously and have requested that the Public Health Department review the current language and prepare suggested amendments for County Board review and action. . It is unfortunate that the City learned of the suspension from a reporter. The notices to the Cities and the media were released at the same time. However, unknown to the Health Department, the notices to the media were sent via facsimile rather than through the mail resulting in the media receiving them at least one day before the Cities received their notices. I regret that this inequity in notice occurred. In any event, it was the opinion of the County Attorney's Office that we could not inform anyone of the license suspension until it had been served on the licensee; the Health Department served notice on affected parties (the Cities) and gave notice to the news media when they were certain that the licensee had been properly served notice. Washington County does nOI discriminate on Ihe basis of race, color. national origin. sex, religion, age or handicapped status in employment or the provision of services_ . Mayor Wally Abrahamson September 12, 1989 Page 2 The City is also concerned that it was not aware of the investigation into Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. and that the County's action was unilateral. Washington County is charged wi th assuring the wise and efficient management of solid waste and has adopted ordinances to carry out that mandate. In the event that an ordinance violation is suspected, the County conducts an investigation and, if a violation of the County's ordinance has occurred, proceeds with enforcement action. In this case a violation was suspected. The Public Health Department, wi thin their authori ty as the Board's agent, conducted an investigation, found a violation had occurred and proceeded with enforcement action as provided for in the County's ordinances. . In the course of this investigation, the cooperation and involvement of the City of Stillwater was not necessary for the Department to conclude that a violation occurred and that enforcement action was necessary. Further, it would have been illegal for the Department to provide the City with details of the investigation. Information being gathered during the course of an active investigation is considered confidential or protected nonpublic data under the Government Data Practices Act (MN. Stat. 13.39). The City has also expressed displeasure regarding the Administrati ve Ordinance and the authority conferred to the Public Health Department. Licensing decisions, particularly in the realm of public health, are typically technical in nature and are best determined by the Department charged with regulating the licensees. The Washington County Board of Commissioners, through its specific ordinances, has provided the parameters within which licensees are to operate. We are confident that the Public Health Department staff are fully capable of carrying out these ordinances and making judgments about licensing decisions. The ordinance provides opportunity for oversight of these decisions by the County Board as evidenced by right to appeal and hearing which Junker Sanitation Service, Inc. has exercised. . The City has requested hearings on the County I s Designation Ordinance. The County conducted hearings on the Designation Plan and Ordinance in 1984 and 1985. Both have been reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council and have been cited as model ordinances for the rest of the region. The City will have an opportuni ty to review and comment on the entire solid waste management ordinance in 1990, as that ordinance is currently being revised to incorporate recently amended state rules. The Designation requirement is part of the ordinance revision; however, we do not expect substantial changes in the designation provisions. Wally Abrahamson September 12, 1989 Page 3 As you are aware, Washington County is considered a leader in waste management in the State of Minnesota. The Resource Recovery Facility is one of the reasons for this reputation. A reliable, steady f ow of waste to the plant is necessary for the successful operation of that facility. It is my hope that respect for changes in solid waste management and cooperation by waste haulers wil eliminate the need for ordinance enforcement. However, to fulfi lour mandate and to continue to effectively and equitably manage solid waste, the County must enforce the provisions of it solid waste ordinance whenever violations occur. I appreciate your attention to this letter and I look forward to continuing this d'alogue as we confront our problems with solid waste management. SE/mlm Third District cc: Washington Co nty Board of Commissioners Charles Swans n, County Administrator P. Jerome Tur quist, Deputy County Administrator Mary Luth, Pu lic Health Director I I ~ . Richard C. Ernst II 5691 Geneva Avenue North Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 September 13, 1989 Mr. Steve Russell Director of Community Devlopment City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Steve: . I spoke to James Swanson from Northern States Power regarding the street lights for the Forest Ridge Addition. He said he needs a written request from the City of Stillwater to get street lights installed. Therefore, please forward the City's request for street lighting to: Mr. James Swanson 779-3143 Northern States Power Co. 1700 East County Road E White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Sincerley, V2- i.- ~ \ ' (5- - Richard C. Ernst II RCEII/ml Hand Delivered . . . . IJf/ NiP Northern States Power Company Saint Paul Division 825 Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117 September 14, 1989 Nile Kriesel City of Stillwater 216 - North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Nile: Northern States Power Company today is meeting with Minnesota Public Utility Commission members to inform them that we will file later this year to increase electric rates. Although it is too early for specific figures, we are asking for a 9-10 percent increase. We are requesting that interim rates be effective next year. This request only partially offsets increasing costs over the last two years. We have reduced the number of employees through an early retirement program and attrition. We have reorganized to increase efficiency. Through employee teams we have identified and implemented savings of nearly $3 million. We have re-evaluated programs, and we have held the line on our budgets. These are but a few of the many ways we have managed to control costs. We continue working on ways to supply the electricity you need at the lowest possible rates. For example, we are retrofitting older power plants to keep them running. We are working with. you - our commercial and industrial customers - to identify ways to control your energy costs through conservation and load management. And we are working with your communities to encourage business development within the NSP service area to ensure a healthy economy. These are some of the many invesnnents NSP must make for the future. We don't like to increase prices, but a rate increase is necessary so you can continue to enjoy reliable, competitively priced service. In our never-ending drive to cut costs, we will nQt compromise reliability, safety, or customer service. If you have questions or comments about NSP's proposed rate increase or our programs and services, please contact me. My business card is enclosed. Sincerely, 111 J .~ ) Your NSP Representative n J/~ b"b ~ ,-.;: 6 ..... ~. . . . 7923 Jamaca Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 September 11, 1989 City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mayor Abrahamson and Members of the City Council: Enclosed are three copies of a flyer announcing an important event that should be of interest to you and your community. That is a "Do the Soon happening that will occur on September 30 in Grant Township in support of trail development. At the event there will be a trail ride along the Willard Munger Trail by horseback and by horse and carriage. In addition, cyclist, walkers and joggers will participate. The happening begins at 10:00 a.m. (with perhaps a few speeches) followed by trail rides, a 10 kilometer jog and bicycle trips ranging from 10 to 35 miles, all culminating in a picnic lunch back at the starting place. We believe that the development of the Willard Munger Trail in Ramsey and Washington Counties will be a tremendous asset to your community. We therefore hope that you will want to attend this event and that you will urge your citizens to attend also. To that end, we would appreciate it if you would post the flyer at the City Hall and any other public places of your choosing. We look forward to seeing you at the first annual "Do the Soon get-together. PHS:mg Ene. ~ ~ ~ 4' . . . STi LL r.:< 1\ ;:"1" " ~ i\ j \'i i"'\ ai\_r1\. ~~ "_ ~,J P.O. Box 2"1 COR RATION, i ~"- \~.. Stillwater, September 1~, 1989 The 11onorRble Wa.llace !\brnhnrnson C:i.t'l of St.LJ};.(/2.te,r- 216 Nortll }'Oll!-th. Street S:=il_,l~~;l{_pr, MN 55087 DeAr Mayor Abrahamson: innescta 55082 ,. '1'1[(, Sti11Wilter Area Economic DevelopllH?nt Ccnporat.ion is now requesting the $5,000 be paid to help fund the Star City work that has been completed and s~)mjtted to the State of t1innesota. Some of the items p y.'cduc8cl to mppt th/;:; Str-1Y C_it~/ requir(:;merl"cs al.e: Video Folders Fo 1.dPT Jns<:rts SUFin1er Intern L'lhor SuriT'~Y Business Retention Survey Tot ill $8,368 2,295 3,22.3 2,1:\50 6,872 1,289 $ 2/J., 902. Ir_) dht-_E~ thc' major porLJ-,,)H of ~YiJ~; :i .lccnI2. b.:ts comE: fTtJm the. folIch.v.Lng: City of Stillwater City of Oak Park Heights City of Bayport Stillwater Township Margaret Rivers foundation ':CotCll $5,OOCl 10,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 $20,000 We are hopeful that our area will be designated a Star City on October 27th when the Governor is in town for the C'Jl~nty I s "Capitol for a Day". We appreciate your support and look forward to receiving your inves tmen t . s " (~-) \ \\ /, " ~..~ 1 , \) .:;:=y" ":""'L\ LI J.Ilne_l METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, kIN. 55101 612291-6359 REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY Jvfetropolitan Council Chair Steve Keefe invites you to his annual regional breakfast meeting for local officials in Washington County. This rneeting will provide an opPoltunity to talk about the issues the Council is dealing with and for you to express your ideas about the Council and its work. . Chair }(eefe will discuss the Council's priority projects for next year, and sorne of the metropolitan issues the Council thinks the legislature nIay address in 1990. Council members are also interested in healing what you think the Council is doing right) what it is doing wrong and what it should be doing in the future. This meeting is scheduled as follows: WHEN: Wednesday) Oct. 4, 1989 7:30 - 9 a.m. WHERE: Brine's Restaurant 219 S. Main Stillwater COST: $5, includes breakfast, tax and gratuity . RSVP: Please call the Council's Community Outreach Division at 291-6500 by Sept. 29. . . . ~ . STILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY 223 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 439-1675 BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES AUGUST 7, 1989 The regular monthly meeting of the Stillwater Public Library Board of Trustees was held on Monday, August 7, 1989. Present: Hansen, Childs, Kalinoff, Engebretson, Welshons, Schmidt. Also present: Bertalmio. The business meeting was called to order by President Hansen at 6:35 P.M. The Board moved to: -Approve the agenda. -Approve the June minutes as mailed with the correction that Don Hansen was present. -Approve the July minutes as published. -Approve payment of bills in the amount of $2,244.44. MEMBER EDUCATION Members should refer to new table of contents in going through their notebooks. Contact Lynne if anything is missing. This should be done before the next meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. BUILDING & GROUNDS - Kalinoff reported that work/research continues on the parking situation. The stone bench has not been repaired. Lynne will contact Jeff Peterson concerning this. 2. SPECIAL PROJECTS -The Stillwater Public Library was well represented in the Lumberjack Day Parade. Participation in the local Fall events will be researched. 3. WCL LIAISON REPORT - Schmidt reported on the July 18 meeting concerning the proposed contract. 4. GOALS - Work continues on a new WCL/SPL contract. The June 30 deadline has passed. Hopefully, by the end of August this will be resolved. OLD BUSINESS A. 1990 BUDGET REOUEST AND HEARING - Hansen and Bertalmio led discussion concerning the 1990 budget proposal. The hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 8, 1989 at 4:30 P.M. at the Stillwater City Hall. Childs, Welshons, Bertalmio and Hansen will attend the hearing. The Board approved Document A. << . Page 2 B. PUBLIC CATALOG -Discussion continued on this item. Projected SPL terminal> count requirements remain close to original estimates. C. WCL/SPL CONTRACT - Lynne has sent a copy of Version 1 of the contract to the WCL Director stating that the SPL Board has indicated a preference for Version 1 believing the level of specificity about dates in this version to be helpful. As directed, she asked Jim Wells that this version be presented to the WCL Board at their August meeting in hopes that negotiations may be concluded and a contract signed by the end of August. D. LONG RANGE CAPITAL BUDGET - Considering the latest available information from WCL, the Board agreed to move the on-line public access catalog from its 1989 capital budget to its 1991 Capital budget. E. KITZMILLER REOUEST - Lynne reported on her research. She will check on the cost of a table for the Maunsell Conference Room. . NEW BUSINESS A. LULLABY CONCERT - Jim Hainlen requested co/sponsorship of this upcoming event. The Board moved to approve SPL co- sponsorship. B. SELECTION POLICY REVIEW - Discussion on same. Changes to be made in Document Bare: -eliminate Appendix B -change second .Appendix A to Appendix B. -change Himself to Self on Appendix C. The Board moved to approve Document B with the above changes. C. WCL/SPL JOINT MEETING - Lynne will suggest meeting dates in September of September 14 and September 18. D. SALE OF DUPLICATE COPIES IN ST. CROIX COLLECTION - A closed auction sale of duplicate items from the St. Croix Collection will be held. The Library will reserve the right to refuse bids it considers inadequate. E. OTHER - Lynne requested the Board to reallocate funds in the 1989 budget. The amount is $4,000 currently in the Database Maintenance Account and would be used for part- time salaries. Motion made, seconded, approved. Lynne expressed concerns over the large attendance for the Summer Programs. Discussion followed on the possibility of finding alternate sites, duplicating programs or taking reservations. The meeting was adjourned at 7:53 P.M. Respectfully submitted, . Mary Ann Engebretson, Acting Secretary The next meeting will be held September 11, 1989. MINNESOTA-WISCONSIN BO~1)ARY AREA COMMISSION 619 SECOND STREET, HUDSON, WISCONSIN 54016-1576 &rving Our SjX)nsoT States on the SL Croix and Mississippi Rfuers since 1965 MirmMota TtK.ephon.e 1612) 43&-7131 00"= Hcurs: 8 A.M. .5 P.M. Monday-Friday September 181 1989 MEMORANDUM MEETING NOTICE TO: Dave Schwartz, Northern states Power Co. Tom Thomsen, Northern states Power Co. Frank Sommerfeldt, Mayor, Oak Park Heightsl Mn. Kathleen Wallace, MinnesotaDNR Steve Johnsonl Minnesota DNR Tim Keegan, Metropolitan Wastewater Control Corom. Nile Kriesel, Coordinator, City of Stillwater Dick Cool, MWBAC Commissioner Randy Schumacher, MWBAC Commissioner FROM: Dan McGuiness, ~1BAC Task Force Chairman. - ST. CROIX RIVER ACCESS TASK FORCE MEETING 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, September 26, 1989 Council Chambers, Stillwater City Hall 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota Phone: (612) 439-6121 The purpose of the meeting will be to review site designs and a draft memorandum of understanding among the parties involved for land acquisition, development, and operation of a public access to the st. Croix River within the City of Oak Park Heights. , W"""",,"n1,,",~ [7151 380-_ '?::,'0, ~ (~ "- ,0 . c;<> AGENDA . CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1989 -- 6:00 P.M. I. Call to Order II. HRi\ ~1eeting III. Visitors Lucy Chaves - County HRA (Section #8) Dick Zi~uerman - Aadition IV. Old Business City Engineer - Fesibility Study Upper 56th St. Reschedule Simonet Home Occupation Request - 9/25 City Assessor Position Loosestrife Agreement Resolution - DNR Donation after 1/1/90 Power Wash Tower - Approximate Cost $3600.00 V. Review of Minutes - August 7th, 14th & 28th VI. New Business Resolution Increasing Refuse Rates to $9.00 Effective 10/1/89 Schedule Budget Hearings - October 30th & November 6th Resolution Increasing TIF Deposit Fees to $5,000 Schedule Public Hearing - ~1inor Subdivision (Swagers) Schedule Public Hearing - Rapid Oil Sign Variance US West Request Gambling License Request - St. Croix Catholic School Resolution approving $28,563 Levy for 1982 Bonds City Hall Change Orders . VII. Departmental Reports Kern - Administration Seggelke - Parks Doerr - Utilities O'Neal - Streets SO~uerfeldt - Police VIII. Correspondence Presented City of Stillwater Dave Magnuson Bob Voto Public Financial Systems Stillwater Agenda ~.1ark Vierling . ** MONDAY I SEPTEHBER 18th - 7: 00 P .t-1. union Contract Workshop ~ ~ ..... ..... q. c.<(/ :J September 19. 1989 1317 N Broadway . Stillwater. Mn. Dear Mayor and City Council Members. I want to draw your attention to a matter of public safety which seems hard to administer on a case by case situation. I refer to visual obstructions of crossing traffic at intersections. The most recent example of not applying the ordinance was at the intersection of Wilkins and N. Broadway . The Ordinance 3UH subd. 23 d, requires fences, hedges, etc, to be three feet or less in height above street grade and green growth of trees eight feet or more above street grade for a distance 40 feet back from the intersecting road edge. The reason for this city ordinance seems obvious to me, to allow drivers to see other cars, trucks, etc approaching the intersection or childern playing in the street. The greatest dangers may lie on some of the less heavily travled streets. North Broadway is only 4 blocks long but supports families with 18 to 20 childern who play in the street, Several live next door to the property in question. To make matters more serious this region during next few years will see an equal number of new teenage drivers_ I believe , that should an accident occur at this intersection , the city has, by it action of choosing not to enforce city ordinance 31,01 subd. 23 (d) , assumed almost total laiablity with no net benefit to the taxpayer. The risk/benefit ratio is almost infinity. I hope it does not require a child to die for this elected body to enforce well conceived laws of this city. . I see this intersection several times a week and last winter the city snow plow almost ran into my car. Not 3 blocks from this location I saw two childern nearly get run over by a car . The problem was the same, high hedges growing up to the corner of intersecting streets. I ask you to reconsider your decision on the previously discussed property and direct the police and public safety department to conduct a survey of city for other problem properties. B;~lY' ROber~.mlin . Planning Comminsioner . . . . SE.P 1 9 1900 Roy W. Holsten Glen E. Schumann David M. Newberg LAW OFFICES HOLSTEN & SCHUMANN Professional Association 124 S Second Street, P.O. Box 206 Stillwater. Minnesota 55082 - 0206 Telephone: 612/439-0700 Facsimile: 612/439-8892 September 19, 1989 Mr. David Magnuson Attorney at Law 324 South Main Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Fredrickson Dear Mr. Magnuson: Pursuant to our previous conversations. I am writing this letter to you as City Attorney for the City of Stillwater. I understand that you will be bringing this matter before the City for consideration and hopefully for a positive resolution. As you know I represent Thomas and Evelyn Fredrickson who are now residents of the Oak Glen Townhouse Development in Stillwater. They presently reside in the townhouse and recently purchased a second lot in that plat legally described as Lot 2, Block 4, Oak Glen Townhouse Plat No, 1, It was their intention by purchasing this lot to turn it over to the City of Stillwater for green space at no charge to the City. They have made arrangements with the Townhouse Association for the improvement of the lot such as grading and sodding and the Townhouse Association is willing to maintain the lot in perpetuity. By entering into a contract with the City, the Townhouse Association will assume that responsibility so it would appear that there would be no maintenance or upkeep for the City of Stillwater nor any costs for such things as maintenance and upkeep. It is hoped by the Fredricksons that the City of Stillwater will accept this proposal and that we can move fOIWard with deeding the property to the City for green space purposes only. After due consideration, could you kindly let me know the City of Stillwater's position on this matter. Sincerely. ~ ~);;~~~ ~Oy -/ Holsten RWH;k