HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-01-03 CC Packet Special Meeting
e
e
e
IM.ex',
~ illwater
~ --~
--- ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
December 28, 1990
M E M 0
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
MARY LOU JOHNSON, CITY CLERK
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING, THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 1991, 4:30 P.M.
This memo is a reminder to Council that a Special Meeting has been scheduled
for Thursday afternoon, January 3, 1991, at 4:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers
of City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota to discuss the
following:
1. Workshop to discuss Downtown Plans & Specifications.
2. Any other business Council may wish to discuss.
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DECEMBER 28, 1990
REVIEW OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PHASE I DOWNTOWN
IMPROVEMENTS.
BACKGROUND:
The plans for Phase I Downtown Improvements are based on two and one half
years of plan preparation and study. Below is a list of key decisions and
dates that have lead up to Phase I implementation plan preparation.
- ,
e
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
June 1987
October 1988
March 1989
e
August 1990
January 1991
March 1991
r illwater
'~ --~
TH~RTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
City Council directs preparation of Downtown Plan.
City Council adopts Downtown Plan.
City Council directs preparation of a feasibility study
for Downtown improvements.
City Council adopts feasibility study for Phase I
improvements and directs preparation of plans and
specifications for Phase I construction in 1991.
City Council considers and approves plans and
specifications, authorizes advertisement for bids.
Bid awarded for Downtown improvement construction.
May -
November 1991 Construction period for Phase I improvements.
The dates after January 1991 are tentative dates subject to Council decision
on January 8th.
PHASE I DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
In August 1990, the City Council directed the preparation of Phase I plans and
specifications. Since that date, Short, Elliott and Hendrickson, the City's
Consulting Engineers, have worked with the twelve I~mber Downtown Advisory
Committee and City Staff to arrive at the final recommended plans.
Through a series of ten Downtown Advisory Committee meetings, the details of
next years recommended Downtown improvements were decided.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
1
e
e
t
#
The recommended plans and specifications being considered by the City Council
at tnis workshop are basically the same as those contained in the feasibil ity
s tu dy wi th some ctlanges. The changes from the feas ibi 1 i ty study and the reason
for the changes are listed below. The cost effect of the changes will be
presented at the workshop. The emphasis of the changes has been to increase
the essential underground utility improvements and reduce and redirect some of
the non-essenti al above ground improvements to get the most affect out of the
dollar spent.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS CHANGES
Main Street - The work on Main Street has been increased based on discussions
with MnDOT from overlay and patching of the street surface to total
reconstruction. This is required for MnDOT to participate in the project,
($1,100,000), and is advisable because at some point in the future, after a
new bridge is constructed, the road may be given to the City of Stillwater to
maintain.
Water Mains - After further discussions, the Water Board decided that since
Main Street will be reconstructed, it makes sense to replace the mains in the
street at this time even though there has not been a record of many problems.
The Board feared the street construction around the old mains could cause a
weakening of the old line connections. The replacement of the water mains
would also assist the Fire Department in having better pressure and more
convenient water availability to fight fires.
Sign Program - Add new sign program to eliminate unnecessary signage and
consolidate existing signs to extent possible. A specific line item budget has
not been developed for this item but a Downtown Action Committee Subcommittee
has been set up and is working with MnDOT, the Public Safety Director, City
Attorney and Short, Elliott and Hendrickson in coming up with a plan. The new
light poles would be used to the maximum extent to eliminate the need for
separate sign poles. It is estimated that as many as fifty percent of the
existing signs can be eliminated.
Lighting - Pedestrian/accent lighting has been removed from the City parking
lots and replaced with lights similar to the highway lighting.
Bluff Lighting - Bluff lighting has been removed from the improvement program.
Entrance Way Improvements - A Downtown Entryway Plan (attached) was prepared
by the Downtown Action Committee with the assistance of the Heritage
Preservation Commission. As a result of the plan, including an implementation
program, the following improvements are recommended as part of Phase I
improvements. The plan is recommended by the Planning Commission for City
Council adoption as a part of the Downtown Plan.
SOUTH CORRIDOR
Vegetation planting management
Entryway sign and improvements
$14,314.00
26,371. 00
BRIDGE CORRIDOR
Tree trimming (open views)
5,000.00
NORTH CORRIDOR
Vegetation planting and management
13,685.00
$59,370.00
2
... " ,.
,
e Landscape Improvements - Landscape improvements have been reduced by reduci ng
planting along some downtown streets and adding landscape along unsightly
areas such as parking lots or at prominent view locations. Chestnut Street,
the major east/west street, will be planted with trees and appear as a formal
travel way as was proposed in the 1917 Downtown Master Plan.
Railroad Treatment - The railroad treatment has been reduced from $187,385.
The reduction is based on comments wi th the ra il road regardi ng improvements
within the right-of-way and eliminating improvement north of Chestnut Street.
The result of these changes is to increase the cost of the infrastructure
improvements and to reduce the cost of streetscape improvements (landscaping,
entrance way, railroad, bluff lighting). The reduced costs for streetscape
improvements will account for some of the increased infrastructure
improvements.
e
e
Phase II Recommendation
The Downtown Action Committee strongly recommends that the parking ramp be
moved up to 1992 construction ahead of Lowell Park levee wall improvements and
that the Council initiate a request for proposals and plan preparation for
1991 so construction can occur in 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council review and comment on Phase I Downtown Improvements so that
any changes can be made and final plans prepared for Council approval at the
regular Council meeting of January 8, 1991.
3
.........
"~.~
~~
~~~
,.-:=::;-:':'~
~~--
.P~~;'
--' DOWNTOWN STILLWATER
ENTRY CORRIDOR PLAN
e
NOVEMBER 1990
e
DOWNTOWN STILLWATER ENTRY CORRIDOR STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduc t ion
Planning Process/Meetings
Goals and Principles
Entrance Corridor Descriptions
Phase I Improvements
Overall Implementation Program
Appendix
e
e
PAGE NO.
1
3
5
6
12
22
e
e
e
" ,
. r
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR PARTICIPANTS
STILLWATER HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Duane Hubbs, Chairperso~
Jeff Johnson
Marl ene Workman
Ray Zaworski
Dick Hauer
Robert Kimbrel
Shawn Draper
LOCAL BUSINESS PEOPLE AND INTERESTED CITIZENS
Mark Balay
Jelle De Boef
Mi ke McGui re
Julie McGuire
Amy Stefan
Ti m Stefan
Bob Raleigh
Steve Johnson, DNR
Martha Hubbs
Jenni fer Tschumper, Chamber of Commerce
Clayton Patterso~
Richard Kil ty
STAFF TEAM
Scott Wende, FORECAST, Public Artworks
C.J. Lilly, Short, Elliott and Hendrickson
Ann Terwedo, Planner
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
Shirley Montbriand, Secretary
MANY THANKS TO -
The William Sauntry Bed and Breakfast
The Rivertown Trolley
Dr. William Morrish, University of Minnesota, Director,
Design Center for the American Urban Landscape
e
e
e
INTRODUCTION:
Downtown Stillwater, on the banks of the St. Croix River, is a unique
commercial district. Nowhere in Minnesota is a local commercial historic
district (soon to be a National Register District) abutting a National Wild
and Scenic River. This contrast of an historic city "core" along a
natural ,river valley presents a picturesque site. The entrances to Stillwater
are an important first view of this community. The break from the natural
environment to the built-environment is a dramatic statement which sharply
defines the Downtown area.
Stillwater Downtown Plan improvements are aimed to, first improve the
infrastructure, and second to provide aroonities for the enjoyment and movement
of pedestri ans throughout do...mtown. These improvements have been planned to
compliment the existing historic character of Downtown Stillwater. The
entrances improvements which will be described later in this report are
recommended from a series of workshops conducted in September and October of
1989. These entrances are described as the South Corridor, North Corridor,
Bridge Corridor, and Myrtle Street Corridor as shown on the attached drawing.
Each area has their own unique visual features, yet provide a welcome to
Downtown Stillwater.
During Public Hearings on the Downtown Stillwater Phase I improvements
concerns were expressed regarding the proposed entryway improvements. These
proposed improvements included bluff landscapiny and lighting and new entry
signage,
On August 16, 1990, the Downtown Plan Action Committee discussed the entryway
improvements. It was concluded that additional study of the entryways was
needed to make sure the improvements were not only consistent with the
Downtown Plan improvements but were sensitive to the natural features of the
St. Croix Wild and Scenic River Valley and the historic resources in Downtown
Stillwater.
The Downtown Pl an Acti on Commi ttee referred the study to Stillwater Heritage
Preservation Commission. This Commission's major purpose is to safeguard the
communities cultural, natural, visual, or architectural history. The entrance
corridors to Downtown Stillwater reflect the natural environment and the
historic integrity of the area. Improvements to these entryways will influence
these important elements as the first impression of Downtown Stillwater.
e
e
\/
-Q'
D
.~
~
'~
.
,
, \l
G
V
e
e
e
PLANNING PROCESS
The Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission and the entrance corridor
participants first met on September 10,1990 at the William Sauntrj Mansion.
The topic of the meeting was to review and discuss the existing conditions in
the four entrance corridors; Highway 36/95 South and Highway 95 North
Entrances, Myrtle Street Entrance and Bridge Entrance.
The group took a short tour on the Rivertown Trolley to view the four
corridors. They were distributed a questionnaire on each of the four entrance
corridors. These questionnaires included topics such as existing activities,
physical characteristics, values and meanings, and future improvements to
these areas (see Appendix A, Sample Questionnaire and results). The group
reviewed and discussed their answers to the questionnaires after the trolley
tour.
After each corridor was discussed, the participants established a preliminary
set of goals and principles. Tnis was then reviewed by the City Staff.
After the September 10, 1990 Entrance Corridor Workshop meeting, the Project
Team reviewed the questionnaire results. The answers to the questionnaires
were broken into four categories, including Existing Conditions - positive and
negative responses, activities, the meaning and/or values of each entrance and
future improvement recommendations, The goals and objectives were then
refined. From this, a conceptual plan for the area was developed.
On October 1~ 1990, the Heritage Preservation Commission and the Entrance
Corridor Participants met for a second time. The group broke into sub-groups
to discuss each of the four entrance corridors. Implementation recommendations
for each entrance corridor was presented to the group, From this meeting, an
implementation program was established. The implementation program is
described in detail in that designated section.
The Heritage Preservation Commission and the Entrance Corridor Participants
met for a third time on October 22, 1990. The various implementation program
for all corridors was presented to the group. Discussion followed based on the
discussion and priorities, budget and project feasibility entryway treatments
are recommended to the Action Committee for Phase I Implementation as part of
the Downtown Improvement Program,
OTHER ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
During the three Entrance Corridor Workshops, special areas and sites were
discussed by the Entrance Corridor Participants. Although they were not
defined in the scope of work for this study, it was agreed that they should be
briefly described in tilis report as important areas for future study by the
City of Stillwater and/or consideration as special sites in the Stillwater
Downtown Plan. These sites include:
AIPLE PROPERTY - Develop a park plan for the site which would include a
definition on the type of pubic recreational activities the site could
support.
LOWELL PARK - Design a landscape plan and park use for this park which
will
- screen off cars from the park and the river.
- recall the original recreational intent of this park.
e
RIVER ENTRANCES TO STILLWATER - Develop a specific river entrance plan
possibly as part of Lowell Park plan that will:
- provide public facilities for river users
- provide public information on Stillwater attractions.
- establish a welcome to historic Stillwater through landscaping, and
design elements defined in the Downtown Plan,
STAIRWAYS AND PATHWAYS - The Chestnut Street, the Laurel Street, the
Highway 95, and most significant, the Main Street stairway are important
pedestrian entrances to Downtown Stillwater. The stairways have provided
a very important link to Downtown Stillwater from the residential
neighborhoods since they were the first constructed in the late 1800's.
Early Wilson photos from the 1870's show the Main Street steps
constructed of wood.
Develop a public improvement and lighting improvement program for the
stai rways.
KOLLINER PARK - Develop a park plan for future use of this site.
e
e
e
e
e
GQt\LS_AND PRINCIPLES
The following Goals and Principles establish a basis for the Implementation
Program for the Entryway Corri dors to Downtown Sti llwater. These ni ne broad
statements show sensitivity to both the natural environment of the St. Croix
River Valley and historic Downtown Stillwater. Each statement was developed
through the discussion process during the Entry Corridor Workshops.
1. Emphasize the special features and unique qualities of each entryway while
screening unattractive elements.
2. Highl ight and improve historic landmarks, tile natural setting, and highway
wayside areas.
3. Maintain strong visual boundaries and definition between the Downtown and
surrounding natural landscapes and urban residential areas by maintaining
and strengthening the existing entrY\'iays.
4. E n try way s s h a 11 m a i n t a i n and en h a n c e e xis tin g contrasts i n co 1 or,
landscape, topography and appearance;
1. Colors: Green, browns to medium grey and tan in color, landscape,
topography and appearance.
2. Lighting: Maintain low intensity lighting along entryway with increased
lighting in commercial downtown area.
3, Land Use: Strip commercial through a green non-commermcialf natural
area of the St. Croix Valley to a rivertown.
4. Views: Short immediate views to longer views and vistas of landmarks,
church steeples and large residences beyond.
5. Provide various avenues to enter the Downtown by car, foot, bike, boat and
train.
6. Maintain and preserve existing entryways.
7. Public or private signs along entryways should not detract from entryway
experience.
8. Use signs or sign symbols that are simple, made of natural material and
consistent with the Downtown historic character.
9. No additional commercial appearing activity shall be allowed between the
bluff and the river along the north and south entryways.
ENTRANCE CORRIDOR DESCRIPTIONS
~ the next section describes each corridor in detail, then reviews the
questionnaire results from the workshop held on September 10, 1990 as
discussed in the Planning Process Section. From these descriptions and
questionnaires, goals and objectives were established and conceptual plans for
each corridor was developed. These conceptual plans are outlined after this
section. The sample questionnaire and results are shown on Appendix A and B.
e
e
SOUTH ENTRANCE CORRIDOR
Entrance Description - Traveling east on State Highway 36 from the commercial
strip in Oak Park Heights/Stillwater, the Washington County Government Center,
the Northern States Power King Plant, and various residential land uses can be
viewed. Once past the Exit 23, Bayport/Oak Park Heights overpass, the St.
Croix River valley opens up to the eye. Summer recreation activities on the
St. Croix are in clear view. The large expanse of water along with the river
bluffs makes a breathtaking entrance to the river valley.
As State Highway 36 veers northward and merges with Highway 95, the road drops
below the tree line so the river can no longer be clearly viewed. At the base
of the decent, Sunnyside Marina, there are cluttered billboards and
residential structures. The natural environment overtakes the highway at this
point. The natural vegetation, and sheer bluffs on the west side of the
highway creates a natural tunnel forcing one northward. A break from the
tunnel is the Oasis Gas Station. The Aiple Barge Terminal can be seen on the
east side of the highway. The St. Croix River is open to view at this point.
Once past the Aiple terminal, the natural environment again takes over.
Suddenly, river views begin to open up and the historic Lift Bridge can be
seen through the trees. The elevator, Dock Cafe, and Brick alley is set before
the eye. As the highway veers slightly northwest, the whole city opens up. The
historic buildings, church steeples, lights, signs, parked cars and pedestrian
activity is there. The river town environment takes over almost instantly,
Questionnaire Response - The major response to the existing conditions of the
South Entrance was similar to the North Entrance. The natural bluffs and
vegetation along the St. Croix River Valley and the contrast of the historic
buildings is an important statement to the entrance of the Downtown. The
general meanings and/or values to this entrance was the statement that this is
the most IIheavilyll used entrance to Stillwater and the St. Croix Valley. It
provides an imp6rtant separation between the strip area of Oak Park Heights
and the historic 1I0ldll Downtown Stillwater. Negative responses to this area
include traffic,'poor public and private signage and the view of heavy parking
in front of the Brick Alley at the entrance. Major ii~rovement suggestions to
this area from the questionnaire are screening parking, opening views to the
river, removal of unneeded signage and improvements or replacement of existing
entrance signage.
NORTH ENTRANCE CORRIDOR
Entrance Description - The railroad bridge in the residential area known as
IIDutchtownll on State Highway 95, North of Downtown Stillwater, begins the
north entry to the community. Once south of the bridge, the vegetation and
sheer bluffs surround the highway. The old St. Paul to Stillwater railroad
e
line runs parallel with the highway. Along this stretch veiled views of the
river can be seen through the dense vegetation. When the highway veers
sl ightly southwest, the historic homes and church steeples on the river bluffs
circling Downtown open-up.
At the railroad spur line, a bump in the road jostles the senses. The
Minnesota Zephyr and Territorial Prison Site are presented as the entrance
gates to Downtown Stillwater. Viewed south from this point are blue warehouse
buildings, Staples Mill, and the new three story Desch office building. Vacant
land and an old converted service station are located on the east side of the
highway providing an opportunity for redevelopment and enhancement of the
area.
Questionnaire Response - The major positive response to the existing
conditions of the North Entrance to Downtown is the natural environment of the
bluffs and vegetation along the St. Croix River Valley. Activities in this
area include traffic and a small amount of recreational activities. Joggers
and bikers often use Highway 95. A major meaning or value of this entrance is
the quick transition from the natural environment to the historic built
environment, The natural bluffline defines or frames Downtown Stillwater.
Negative responses to this area include unkept wayside markers, visible
utility poles and unattractive warehouse buildings. Major improvement
suggestions to this area from the questionnaire include a general cleanup,
removal of utility poles, and improvement to the Tamarack House and prison
site. Historical markers to make them more distinguished. A full outline of
improvements are described in the Implementation Section.
e
MYRTLE STREET CORRIDOR
Entrance Description - The Myrtle Street entrance to Downtown Stillwater is a
secondary entrance used primarily by residents of Stillwater and those
entering Stillwater from Highway 12.
Proceeding east on Myrtle Street, crossing Owens and Greeley Streets, the area
is residential with corner-store variety/commercial uses, parking lots, and
churches. At Harriet Street, the entrance to Downtown Stillwater begins.
Myrtle Street veers slightly at a northeast angle then suddenly the whole St.
Croix River Valley and Downtown Stillwater can be seen. The historic gazebo,
along witn the Hooley's sign at the river1s edge, are the focal points which
draw your senses down the hill. Church steeples, rooftops and the Wisconsin
river bluffs are proceeding down east toward the river. The gazebo and
Hooley's signs are always in sight. At Fourth Street higher density
residential land uses and commercial offices take over. Third Street is the
break between residential and Downtown commercial historic buildings and
parking lots proceeding eastward toward the river.
e
Questionnaire Response - The major positive responses to the existing
conditions of the Myrtle Street Entrance was the views to the Lowell Park
Pavilion and the river. The historic buildings and churches were also an
important visual element. A general meaning and/or value to this entrance was
that this entrance was not a primary entrance but a secondary one used by
residents of Stillwater, Myrtle Street provides a break between the
residential and commercial area. Activities along this corridor include
traffic, biking, and walking. The negative responses to this area are the lack
of trees, lights, and utility poles. The IISuper Americall signage and Hooley.s
, '
sign were negative visual elements. Improvements to this area from the
questionnaire include removal of bad signage or a rest area on Myrtle Street
~ and screening parking lots,
BRIDGE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR
Entrance Description - As one proceeds New Richmond, Somerset, and the
agricultural plains of Wisconsin along Highway 65, the countryside begins to
change from farmlands to forests and rolling hills. At Houlton, the road veers
to the right and begins to descend through heavier vegetation. Cornfields and
dairy cattle are left behind when views of the historic Stillwater Lift Bridge
can be seen, first in sections and then in full view. You are suddenly in a
different place. Church steeples and red brick buildings silhouette the
eastern river bluff with riverboats and a green ribbon of park land and grey
concrete walls defining the river1s edge, The bridge begins to retreat as you
draw closer. Suddenly, with a jolt, you realize there are parks on the right
and left, riverboats, train rides, dining, and shopping. What is this strange
place? Where shall I park?
e
Questionnaire Response - The Bridge Entrance to Stillwater is similar to the
entrance one views as they approach Stillwater by boat. The positive responses
to this entrance include the panoramic silhouette of the rivertown with the
river boats, LO\vell Park historic commercial buildings, church steeples, and
beautiful bluffs. A major meanings and/or values to this entrance was a
"beauti ful river city II . Negative responses to thi s entrance are the 1 ack of
screeni ng for the parki ng along Lowell Park and Mulberry Point. Some private
signage and lighting was poor. Improvements as suggested in the questionnaire
are improvements to the Lowell Park waterfront, screening the parking, and the
addition of entrance signage somewhere along the corridor.
Development of Conceptual Plan
During the September 10, 1990 Workshop, answers to the questionnaire were
discussed and goals and objectives were defined. A framework was then
established for the development of a conceptual plan for each corridor.
These concept plans follow this section.
e
-
-
e
H"TUm I
~. ~~IHro~E. ~HGj .
~1?~,,6tIA~,
./"':'--.....- '....
---/"-... "-" ";
ofeH ~EcrtP Vf~1-I6 To et:1/?~~
N-b foAT lANOIH4 ",' '
f;b./E.lPf7 l.ot-l6j -~1 f(,AH ref!. 4r( lA4'ff?
!;trHAl'/Gt '~~rlt,A.11OH NiD
~lt;f, ~T1oHf\L.' P~ti~ LoT ~~
171M-Lop J:. />.'A~~1I-~/t;11lj;:u1t;:.j1-
IMf'tG::;V~ ftO~IAH /!NV1~oHH~ />-HI?
'OlJIU7INc.,J~ l'/6jtrnHq - ~EMoY~ VI7/)AI..
C:;l-Urn;.~/ 61~H7
~ t:X1~H~ totqtl~ 9f!UHtft-l, 7~Lr;e.TIYr.l-1'
~t:I~E: f?W.Ir-r:JftoCl(; olJftjt~ l-IHrm-? MinH'
IH!"II,1L- t.oH61&rN:iT WI1i-/ e.'l<l-9f1 ~I~ tHAtt.p.cwz: 9
T~ M7f? tol,..~ AHt/ ~.Jr-~
~e:~~TIOH ~rt'/PA1'H~TlC:; T'" HA.TI.lM/.-
u.u F /..1i-1r::.) o$U~[.jEP ToHe. ralt. P~Ie.l,t
~ F l.-1~h11H~ '
::;tJCi~10r 1...r~1ITtD JMp~tHT? To BIr..f.,r-.-OAF4?~,
~IU l...J>Ht?jtAf'I~ AHr.;> flU~I~A1U:7 t::!..~He:HT:$
ENTRYWAY STUDY
, tor-it-EFT
"PLAN
SOUTH ENTRY CORRIDOR
STILLWATER, MN.
8 ClC\. ''') ()
FILE NO,
ORG, NO,
e
opt;..H ~~ '/I~~
To 1Vjg:.~\2.l'i~ '
WMliW IMPttaV~..-r1~tT? 'To
HI~I? t'1N21t~ ~11e:
;~,,~r ,.. l-l~IH~/~I~
~Al t.-
e
e
, ~@ J"'~" ~
~j~\""
~N-I-MJ.I?I< 1
I11Lflfj., :-'
'..{~t4.JilL
.J.
. .....'.\
~NH E><~l1rlG, ~1t?oIl ~tt~~Ht.tt:f,
?e'.I..e:qlVU- \' ~po~ i?I..- u~" jtot. ~
~it\'GOP~ J L.\t'wrw ~ 1t-lf1l.-t..
toH~~ 1~\1i-I ~~ H~ t ;:.c,t\<
To f:>.W to~ p...!-H:? ~~
kAlHTJ>JH f.>:~~G1 ~iuttP-~ ~a:
J.oHCt.1t*f Ul1t..l1J t..oO>ol1orl
I!-I~~~~
8t>cT.' ()
fiLE NO
ENTRYW AY STUDY
?or\~(:;Ff
f'L--t\N
NORTH ENTRY CORRIDOR
STILLWATER, MN.
ORG NO.
.
e
e
I
'\
-< ~N Y/~ AT ~,~~ ~H'TIZr
SC"'-l N FUr
,_
r
::J
L1'1Hf 5TAlfdJA""~ A.NI? I:;:/D.;aop Mlt:'~
POIHr ~/O~W:7o~ p..:z'e.l:-6
~~ :V~I)AL. IXiI~ DF PA~JNC:j
lPT~ NiD ~/00 Of' e>I1II...OlH~?
o 100 200 300 400 600
~'-L'
ENTRYWAY STUDY
: CoI'1?t..fT
fLffi
MYRTlE & BRIDGE ACCESS
STIllWATER, MN.
B oc;y; dJo
FILE NO,
ORG, NO,
e
e
e
PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS
The previous sections describe entrance corridors unique features, the goals
and principles, and the concept plans which set a framework for the
Implementation Program.
The following section lists the implementing actions that together make up the
Entryway Implementation Program. This section draws from the overall
implementation program a list of First Phase implementing actions.
The Phase I improvements recommended below were prioritized by the Entrance
Corridor Participants and then reviewed with budget and costs for
implementation. The recommendations were then reviewed according to the
feasibility for Phase I implementation.
The implementing actions and estimated cost is listed below by entry
corridor.After that, improvements in each corridor are described with
illustrated drawings. The Downtown Plan Action Committee reviewed the Entrance
Corridor Plan on October 15, 1990. The Committee recommended that a $60,000
budget be prepared for the total costs of improvements. The South entry sign
and the vegetation planting and management are proposed to be included in
Phase I Improvements.
SOUTH CORRIDOR
Vegetation planting management
Entryway sign and improvements
$14,314.00
26,371.00
BRIDGE CORRIDOR
Tree trimming (open views)
5,000.00
NORTH CORRIDOR
Vegetation planting and management
13,685.00
$59,370.00
MYRTLE STREET
None proposed
--
\
(
\
\
e
// )
II /' '
'{
\
\ '
STILLWATER LOGO
CARVED INTO TIMBERS
GROUNDCOVERS
HEAVY TIMBER SIGN
GRAVEL BOURDER
PLAN VIEW SCALE 1:4
RELOCATED FLAGPOLE
; It ;.
",
FRATERNITY SIGNS
STONE BASE
ELEVATION DRAWING SCALE 1:4
APPROVE 0 '
FILE NO.
DATE
PREPARED BY
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC,
ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA . CHIPPEWA FALLS. WIse
CONCEPT PLAN FOR
STILLWATER ENTRY SIGN
DRAWING NO.
-'
e
e
e
..
BRIDGE CORRIDOR
Vegetation Planting and Management - along the corridor includes tree trimming
at the base of the Stillwater-Houlton Bridge to open City views for travelers
entering from the East. The trimming would take place in Kolliner Park on the
North and south sides of the roadway as shown on the Bridge Entry perspective.
e
e
e
NORTH CORRIDOR
Vegetation Planting and Management - As with the South Corridor, a landscape
management plan would be prepared and implemented as a Phase I project. Trees
would be trimmed, dead trees removed, accent trees and bushes planted, and
wall areas exposed to reveal stone outcroppings.
e
e
-
OTHER SPECIAL IMPROVEMENTS
Because of budget limitations or timing constraints, five improvement projects
were not included in the First Phase recommendations but are recommended by
the committee as projects that should be given priority consideration. These
projects include pedestrian and bike paths running from Downtown to the north
and south Ci ty boundaries and beyond. Stairway maintenance and improvement to
four existing stairways leading to Downtown from the surrounding residential
neighborhoods and Prison Plaza improvements.
Pedestrian/vehicle pathways - With improvements to Highways 36 and 95 being
planned in conjunction with a new Highway 36 bridge, it is difficult to
specifically define the location or type of pedestrian and bicycle pathways
connecting Downtown with destinations to the South. A pedestrian/bicycle path
does connect Afton State Park to Interstate 94. It was recommended during
report preparation that a trail system should connect Afton State Park to
O'Brien State Park through Downtown Stillwater. This il~rovement is a high
priority of the entryway plan but the time is not yet right for
implementing the idea. It would be important to coordinate such a project with
Washington County, MnDOT, DNR, and the other local governments along the
route.
Downtown Stairs - The existing Laurel Street, Chestnut Street, and Main Street
stairs are currently in various states of repair. The Parks and Public Works
Directors compare the stairs to a car that needs constant maintenance. Beside
the condition of the stairs and railings, lighting and maintenance of areas
around the stairs is of concern. In addition, the stairs currently in use, a
fourth stairs located just South of the Oasis Restaurant is no longer in
disrepair but salvageable with reconstruction. The committee feels strongly
that these connections from the surrounding residential areas to the Downtown
were vital residential areas to the Downtown were vital residential as well as
pedestrian access to Downtown. The Committee felt the City should do what is
necessary to improve or reconstruct the stairs if needed, to maintain these
connections in a safe condition. To do this, the Committee recommends the
Public Works Department prepare a detailed conditions of stairways report that
could be used to program Phase II and Phase III improvement.
Pri son Pl aza - A thi rd project that the Committee felt was important but was
not prepared to make specific recommendations on was for the Prison Plaza area
(the open space and wayside area in front of the old prison). There currently
is a historical marker at that location along with North Main entry signage.
The Committee felt the site has potential for significant improvement but was
not sure what should be done. With the changes and improvements to the North
Main Street area, the future of the old Prison Site Plaza may become clearer.
An illustration shows the existing sites and its relationship to the
surrounding area.
Some of the improvements suggested the addition of a second or third historic
marker designating the site, liThe First Territorial Prison", and liThe Prison
Where the Younger Brothers Were Incarcerated", providing a clearer connection
with the Warden's House, relocating a North Entryway sign, clear vegetation
from the south prison walls, screen buses and larger vehicles from the rear of
the site.
e
e
e
Tamarack Site - Improvements to this site includes paving the parking lot and
driveway, landscaping an area for a picnic table, bench and trash receptacles
as shown on the site perspective. The design elements of the
improvementswould be similar to the Boom Site design elements using stone and
heavy timbers.
Chestnut and Water Streets Vacant Lot - At the northwest corner of Water and
Chestnut Streets is a lot knows as the Fezendin Lot. This would be improved
as another bridge corridor project. Vines could be planted along the building
walls, shrubs planted along the sidewalk, three large white pine trees planted
on the site and gravel spread over the surface of the lot. An illustrated
drawing shows the appearance of the bridge entry corridor views form the west
after Phase 1 streetscape improvements, future Lowell Park improvements and
bridge entry corridor improvements.
PLAZA
::
BLUFFLlNE ~RETAINING WALL
. ,
., ,
.:.. 1-..::.i...,_.:::~\., +:,.'...;~)\':... .,:.'..~.:.... .',.< ..:,::
~~~~=::,;~::::::,S~~::~:,.="_;;,L-,=:~:'_.:i~~~~;~,~~~~~:J
Cl1J
"PICNIC TABLE
PRAIRIE GRASSES AND
WILDFLOWERS
PLAN VIEW SCALE 1 :30
__'~_R'_..__'.'~_.4'_____,_,~"_________,_,__,__,, ... ..:.._. ._.......____.._.. _.........._.
~
.~" .......
HISTORIC MARKER
HWY.95
SECTION/ELEVATION SCALE 1 :20 ,
PPROVE D
ST PAUL. MINNESOTA . CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISC
CONCEPT PLAN FOR
TAMARA~HOUSE
HISTORIC MARKER
FILE NO.
89255
DRAWING NO.
DATE
NOV.1990
PREPARED BY
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC,
OVERALL IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
e
This implementation section describes the actions necessary to implement the
entryway corridor plan. Some of the actions can be achieved annually through
maintenance and routine activity. Other activities will require additional
planning and funding in order to implement the project. Overall, the
implementation program provides the City with a comprehensive approach to
maintaining and improving the entryways to Downtown Stillwater.
The implementation program is first described in terms of specific entry
corridors; r~orth, South, Bridge, Myrtle Street or other. The discussion of
each corridor implementation measures are listed in the following table.
The table lists the implementation measures, then describes the measure in
terms of responsibility for implementation, timing of action, cost and
location of activity.
e
SOUTH CORRIDOR
The South entry corridor begins when one descends from Highway 36 and the West
Stillwater Business Park, then turns North from Sunnyside Marina along the St.
Croix River into Downtown Stillwater. This entry is the most heavily used and
commonly recognized entryway with over 15,000 trips per day traveling this
stretch of road. As one enters from the South the vegetation and steep chalk
cliffs frame the roadway and are the features most often mentioned by people
entering the Downtown from that direction.
The plan and implementation program for the South entryway includes:
LANDSCAPE PLANTING AND MANAGEMENT PLAN - prepare a landscape improvements
management plan that includes the following elements:
- maintains existing vegetation with provision for some selective
trimming to expose rock outcroppings and river views.
- uses plant material that is native to the Lower St. Croix River
corridor.
- provide direction for selective new plantings and seedlings that
enhance the seasonal change in color and plant variety.
- maintains a variety of plant material, decidious and evergreen,
bushes, trees, vines and grasses.
- maintains the natural random appearance of entry landscaping.
selectively removes or trim trees and bushes between the roadway and
river in order to open up views that highlight special river
features such as the bridge and riverboats and the downtown.
Implementation - Summer 1991.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - prepare landscape maintenance plan for Highway 36
roadside and railroad tracks.
Implementation - annually.
SOUTH ENTRYWAY SIGN
- opens view of the river, bridge and river boats just before entering
town.
relocates the South entryway sign to more prominent and
complimentary location.
- make improvements i.e. grading, planters, flowers.
screens cars parked in South Main parking lot by berming and/or
planting evergreen shrubs compatible with existing evergreens.
Implementation - Summer 1991.
e
e
TRAIL - construction of a pedestrian trail/recreational bike path from
Downtown to the South City boundary.
Implementation - Undetermined.
UTILITIES - removal of overhead utility lines along west side of roadway
between Vittorio's and the Oasis Restaurant.
Implementation - Summer 1991.
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT - screen Oasis parking areas and minimize commercial
signage along with minimizing commercial activity at Vittorio's/Cave Site.
Implementation - at time of new development project review.
REGULATION CHANGES
Rezone area between Highway 36 and the river south of Main Street parks
and recreation open space.
- revise Sign Ordinance to phase out non-conforming signs along the
corridor and Downtown.
Implementation - 1991,
e
NORTH CORRIDOR
The North Corridor is similar to the South Corridor following the cliffs and
reparian vegetation from the Highway 96 intersection to Downtown. Along the
North Corridor the vegetation is thicker and the roadway is narrower. The
entry to the Downtown begins when the traveler passes under the railroad
bridge and turns south with long narrow views of the distant Downtown.
The plan implementation program for the North Corridor includes:
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT - prepare a landscape plan that maintains entrances
existing natural vegetation.
- opens views of the river from the historic Tamarack wayside marker
near the railroad bridge.
- provides for vegetation clearing to expose prominent rock
outcroppings.
- Provides supplemental planting of trees, bushes and grasses
Implementation - Summer 1991.
TRAIL - construction of pedestrian trail/recreational bike path along east
side of roadway connecting Downtown to north City boundary.
Implementation - As possible.
REGULATION CHANGES - rezone lands between road and river single family
residential.
Implementation - 1992.
LAND PURCHASE - apply for State funds to purchase the land north of the
Yacht Club and south of Aiple residence driveway to purchase as part of
the City's river open space and parks system.
Implementation - As land is available.
ENTRYWAY PLAN - Prepare plan for the North Entry prison plaza area. The plan
should have the following elements:
cleanup and expands the site plaza area with possible addition of new
historic marker.
- provides better connection with the historic Warden's House.
- Relocates and improves base area around Stillwater entry sign.
clears vegetation from wall separating prison plaza from Warden1s
House.
e
.
screens busses and other heavy equipment vehicles from plaza view.
- considers lighting up old prison.
Implementation - Undetermined.
PRISON SITE DEVELOPMENT - use the design guidelines in Downtown Plan to guide
the development of the prison site.
Implementation - Ongoing.
e
BRIDGE CORRIDOR
Entering Downtown Stillwater from the east across the historic Stillwater lift
bridge is the most dramatic. The views of the river and silhouette of the town
with the courthouse and church steeples open up in front of you as you
approach the bridge. It would be difficult to plan a more dramatic entry into
a hi storic river communi ty. Improvements can be made to "detai 1" the entryway.
Many of the improvements in this corridor will be made as part of the Downtown
Improvement Program. Bridge corridor improvements are:
LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENT
- river's edge treatment - extend levee wall to Mulberry Point and
- eliminate auto and trailer parking from site.
- screen parking lots as viewed from the river by changing topography
or vegetation screening.
Implementation -
LIGHTING
- Light bridge using acorn lighting similar to standards originally
used on the bridge.
- consider regulating the exterior of buildings as a part of design
review.
Implementation - 1992.
TREE TRIMMING
- tree trimming - selectively trim bushes and trees on City's property
in Wisconsin along the entry road to open value of the river and
downtown.
downtown.
Implementation - 1991.
KOLLINER PARK
- prepare plan for use of Kolliner Park as a park of Stillwater river
open space system,
Implementation - Undetermined.
FAZENDIN LOT
- Develop a plan for improvements to the lot which will complement the
streetscape plan for Chestnut Street.
MYRTLE STREET
The Myrtle Street entry is the local entry to Downtown. Most City residents
who work or shop in the Downtown enter the area along Myrtle or Third Streets.
These entries are important because they are the town entrances and represent
the link between the residential areas and the historic town. Beside the
street entries, three stairs provide excellent access between the surrounding
residential areas and Downtown.
e
The plan and implementation program for the Myrtle Street and residential
entryway includes the following:
e
e
e
LIGHTING
provides pedestrian lighting along the residential entryways. The
special lighting could start at Main Street and follow Myrtle to
Harriet and Owen Street to the west. Street lighting on Chestnut
could start at Main, follow Chestnut to Third, Third to Pine Street
and Pine Street to Greeley. All three stairways should be lighted
for safe use at night as well as during day hours.
Implementation - Undetermined.
LANDSCAPING PLAN
- street landscaping Should be provided along Myrtle Street from
Harriet to Main Street. Unsightly views of parked cars, rears of
buildings and trash areas should be screened and the general
appearance of the street improved. This is particularly appropriate
at Fourth and Myrtle and Second and Myrtle Streets. Some of the
improvements will be on public property while others will have to be
coordinated with private owners.
Implementation - 1991-96.
SIDEWALK PAVING
special paving, color or design should mark the major pedestrian
access points to downtown. This can be accomplished over time as new
sidewalks are installed as part of the City Capital Improvement
Program.
Implementation - ongoing.
REST AREA LOCATION
- Rest areas including a bench for sitting off to the side of the
sidewalk may be constructed along steep hills such as MYrtle Street,
Third Street and some of the stairs. An unimproved area and
dilapidated bench is situated along the Main Street stairs. This
area could be upgraded as part of the residential entryway
improvement or a separate program.
Implementation - Undetermined.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE - Trees and bushes west of Sixth Street along MYrtle
require regular trimming so they do not crowd the sidewalk. By
constructing a two foot stone wall along the north edge of the
north sidewalk the bluffed hillside could be retained and sidewalk
area better defined. This could be accomplished with a stone and
wood railing on the south side of Myrtle, east of Harriet.
Implementation - Annually.
DESIGN REVIEW - when planning permits are applied for, special attention
should be paid to the loading/utility areas of the building to make
sure parking and loading areas are adequately screened or located as
to not be seen from pedestrian sidewalks or streets.
* Implementation - ongoing.
IMPLEMENTATION TABLE
The following implementation program table lists implementation activity,
location of activity, timing for activity implementation cost of project (to
extent available) and agency or agencies responsible for carrying out the
project. 1991 improvements are marked (1),
e
e
e
PARTIAL PLANT LIST ALONG NORTH AND SOUTH CORRIDORS
Listed below are plants acceptable to use in the north and south natural
entryway areas. The plants, trees, bushes, vines, and grasses found on this
list can be seen naturally along the roadsides or up the bluffs. Some of the
landscape materials may not be appropriate for use in other areas of the
Downtown or other areas of the City of Stillwater but are appropriate for use
in the Unaturalll north and south entryway corridors.
TREES
B i rc h
Wild Fruit Trees
Box Elder
Soft Maple
Willow (some locations)
Poplar
Red Oak
Ash
BUSHES/SHRUBS
Wild Rose
Sumac
Cedar
EVERGREENS
White Pine
Red Pine
Cedar
GRASSES
Native grasses
Wil d Flowers
VINES
Virginia Creeper
Wild Blackberry
Engl ish Ivy
e
~I
lj
r 0
i'
\
\
\
I
\
e
~
~
"'
It
e
I
\
!
I
I
I
I
;
i
\
,
/
/
~:
'\
\
,\
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
\0-
~
'. \)
\ ~
\:\ i
e
STILLW ATER ENTRytfRRIDOR WORKSHOP
MYRTLE STREET ENTRY
e
WI
\J "T1
63 0
r
o :JJ
);:. m
~ 0
6 }>
JJ en
G -I
Present: What is the
existing situation
Future: What do you want to
see on the corridor Isite
MEETINGS
PURPOSE
SIGNIFICANCE
ACTl V I TIES:
A C1' I V E
PASSi VB
~~~
I'\)Z01
~Z01
I'\)mm
:;:~5
,woo
~cs:
(f)-
.2
s:G)
ZO
~2
.z:,.
o
.....,
PHYSICAL
CHARACTER 1ST ICS
WHAr V ALVES
ARE EXPRESSED
COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION
OTHER COMMENTS
~;~,.: ..
'..:..
., '..
""";0;..:
..-".
):::0 ,",>,
"0 "Co'.
"0
([)
::l
0-
--I, f.~"
x..",." "
~ I~~;r
"~.t,~~~~~;;{;:. ?~
~I;l
APPENDIX B
$T LLWAlER ~~TRY CO~RIDOR_ WORKSHOP
SEPTEMBER.IO. 19~0
NORTH ENTRY RESULTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
RESPONSES POSITIVE
e
RESPONSES NEGATIVE
Well defined busi ess area
The undisturbed 1 sh vegetation
free of commerc al signs &
buildings until I the RR tracks
& old prison site opens up the
business area I
Prison nicely tucied in
Bl uffs beautiful s is
Railroad bridge i entry
Rocks/Bluffs are great
Natural vegetatior
Less traffic ~I
Very close bluffl .ne
Downtown lights/c urthouse
Fits wild and sce ic designation
ACTIVITIES I
2
2
2
3
2
Cars
Jogging
Li ttl e activi ty
i
I
I
MEANINGS/VALUES I
It provides a verlv
of the frame fot
Ra i 1 road bri d ge ils
defi ne entry I
Strong entry i
Anticipation I
Quick transition~rural-urban
Seems like North~rn Minnesota
important part
the 01 d town.
enough to
No lights
Places to stop are hard to find
Tacky trai 1 er
Lumber Company
Wayside markers
look negl ected
Riverside entry is weak at
Domino's parking lot,
Riverside is dreadful
Utility poles
No side~-ialks
Domino's Pizza area is un-
attractive.
Warehouse buildings
e
e
Q
e
NORTH ENTRYWAY - CONTINUED
FUTURE - ALL CATEGORIES
RESPONSES POSITIVE
3
e
e
2
2
Plant out - the trains parking
Does the City need a large entry
sign here? I hope not.
Emphasize stone and cliffs
Historic prison site reuse
Same treatment for sign as South
closer to ground - light it well
Lush year-round vegetation to
frame si 9n.
Reuse old stone on Warden's House
wall and mix with new.
Pressure natural amenities
No change to treeline
Need a bikeway to Marine along bluff
or Railroad tracks
Pathway
Remove overheads
Paint blue buildings
Provide new signage
A new sign for Warden's House
Maintain ururalu attitude until into
communi ty.
Historical sites more distinguished
New sidewalks
Keep heavy vegetation
Prison property should be noted more
historically with signage
The junk should be moved away.
Wayside should be fixed or removed.
Stay the same
Improve the prison wall
Improve si gnage
Park and walk in
Museum focus.
2
STILLWATER ENTRY CORRIDOR WORKSHO~
SEPTEMBER 10~90
BRIDGE ENTRY RESULTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHYSICAL ELEMENTS
RESPONSES POSITIVE
RESPONSES NEGATIVE
2
2
Bluffs
Historic buildingls/
Historic View .
Marinas, Restaura~ts
Dense vegetationjgood
Whole setting
Silhouette of to n
Freight House
River boats
River Pavilion
Lowell Park
Church steeples
Surrounded by river/peninsula
Panoramic
Dock Cafe
5
2
ACTIVITIES
River boating
Sightseeing
Walking
Driving
MEANINGS/VALUES
RESPONSES POSITIVE
i
Amusement park I
Beautiful river 4ity
Historic I
Surprise entry i
A special city t'
The bridge is a omplete entry
from the East-t provides the
the third sideiframing the
II Do\'m town II . !
Bad signage (Hooley.s)
The rivers edge
North of pavilion
is falling apart
NSP tower emissions
Power plant stack
Inability to stop
Poor lighting
SA signage is bad
Parking by Popeye's
I>
e
e
e
&
.
e
BRIDGE ENTRY - continued.
FUTURE - ALL CATEGORIES
RESPONSES
4
e
e
POSITIVE
Entrance should be enhanced &
maintained.
A welcome to MN sign by bridge
Plantings around parking areas
at bridge entrance to soften
and shade.
Leave alone.
Lights at night would be
functional for safety and add
to river view.
Improve waterfront
Leave bridge
Keep bridge and entry
The entrances (North, South &
Bridge) should be simple
(restrained). The Downtown is the
subject. The entrances function as a
cleansing separations between the
Downtown and everything else.
Improve recreational aspects of Levee.
Protect!
Keep East shore natural.
Graphic guidance to get people on their
feet walking.
Light the bridge.
Define urban density through a hard edged
riverfront e.i. continue to Popeye's.
STILtiWATER ENTRY CORRIDOR W,ORKSH9P
SEPTEMBER 10. 1990
SOUTH ENTRY RESULTS
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
I
POSITIVE I
I
R.R. tracks interrsting
Natural bluffs
Working industry
Vegetation, bluff~ine
Lush, undisturbed
vegetation make the
business area b gin
dramatically.
Natural appearanc
Historic building
Palisades & stone walls
Bridge
Woods
RESPONSES
ACTIVITIES
2
3
2
2
RESPONSES NEGATIVE
5 Tacky, ugly Vittorio's
ye 11 ow s i g n
2 Utility lines
Aiple use unattractive
Civic organization
signs look tacky
Heavy parking
Lack of maintenance
2 Oasis gas station
Clutter of organization
signs.
Congestion
Poor lighting
Boating
Biking
River recreational use
Traffic
i
MEANINGS/VALUES !
i
I
Most sensitive entry
Provides importa~t separation between
hill, etc. and old town.
Entry to St. Croix Valley
Rustic/woodsy fl nked by industrial
First view I
Calm, surprise I
Touri st entrance,
First entrance f~r most visitors
Small, quaint, hqmetown
Best IIfirst impr~ssionll entry
I
Good entry i '
Most used entrande
Dramatic entry i
..
e
e
e
SOUTH ENTRY - CONTINUED
FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS - ALL CATEGORIES
RESPONSES
e
2
4
e
e
Li ght bri dge
Callout activity where it isn1t happening
Right lighting
Light commander
Preserve industrial feel
Open up views of river to boats-bridge
Preserve natural beauty
Bike path
Light buildings and Commander Elevator
Enhance lighting
Aiple property - visitors center
Vittorio's nick-nack should be removed
Historic appearance should be maintained.
No civil organization signs
Like idea of bluff lighting
Aiple property - park land
Existing sign isn't so bad - should be set
closer to ground.
Walking and biking path along the bluff or
R.R. track to Bayport, Lakeland should be
kept clean and simple
Absolutely no signs
Enhancement of existing planting
Some lighting of bluff (can be abused)
Plant out entry parking lot
Get rid of activities - good feeling
for tourism e.i. caves & Oasis
Expose river bluffs
Restore Vittorio's
Walking trail by R.R. tracks
No drastic changes
Improve signage to fit in with Brick Alley site
Industrial area needs cleaning
Enhance natural elements
Minimize commercial land use
Screen parking
Controlled development of riverbank
Connection to river activity
Park/ride into town
Old mill needs work
Bluff side - little change
River side - Pedestrian
Remove Vittorio's patio
Make entry to St. Croix Valley
More light
Maintain/reduce commercialism
Provide parking
I think our comm~ents should extend beyond the 36 ramp
Integrate with mall. (so I1lIcll parking)
Adopt a highway (entrance)
Buses should park somewhere else
River what it now is to City - used to be industrial. Is it still?