The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-11-20 CC Packet e AGENDA STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL November 20, 1990 SPECIAL MEETING REGULAR MEETING 4:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 4:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Discussion of Labor Relations Issues. 2. Discussion of Metro Relations, Inc. and Suburban Rate Authority. 7:00 P.M. AGENDA e CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION ROLL CALL INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS STAFF REPORTS UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Request for blacktopping of Hudson Street. 2. Request to Transfer title of Road for Greens Townhomes. NEW BUSINESS 1. Final Plat approval of four-lot subdivision located on E. Poplar St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist., David Roettger & Larry Dauffenbach, applicants. e PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS (Continued) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Resolution Directing Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8397) 2. Applications (List to be supplied at meeting). 3. Submission of claim from Mark Ehlenz for damage to auto from portable toilet at Northland Field to insurance company. 4. Set Public Hearing Date of December 4, 1990 for the following Planning Cases: a. Case No. SUB/90-63 - Resubdivision of two lots into three lots of 44,914 sq. ft., 162,064 sq. ft., and 90,190 sq. ft. on the northeast corner of Co. Rd. 5 and Orleans St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist./Planned Unit Dev. Dist., Washington Co. HRA, applicant. b. Case No. PUD/90-64 - Planned Unit Development for the construction of a 49 unit senior housing complex, a 7,000 sq. ft. senior center, and a 44,910 sq. ft. commercial lot on the northeast corner of Co. Rd. 5 and 1 Orleans St. in th RA, Single Family Residential Dist./PUD Planned Unit Dev. Dist., Washi gton Co. HRA, applicant. c. Case No. SUB/90-6 - Minor Subdivision of a three acre site into two ~ lots 0 2,0 sq ft. and two acres on the northeast corner of the Frontage Rd. and uenge Dr. in the BP-C, Business Park Comm. Dist., Lawrence Rose, ap licant. d. Case No. SUP/90-6 - Special Use Permit to convert two existing office spaces lnto three apartments at 115 So. Union St. and 112 So. Main St. in the CBD, Centr 1 Business Dist., Mike Lynskey, applicant. e. Case No. SUB/90-6 - Minor Subdivision of a 15,010 sq. ft. lot into two lots 0 , 0 sq. ft. at 406 W. Hickory St. and No. Martha St. in the RB, Two Family Re idential Dist., Marilyn Morehead, applicant. f. Case No. V/90-68 Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of an awning sign at 1940 So. Greeley St. in the BP-I, Business Pk. Indus. Dist., Clark Nybe g, applicant. g. Case No. SUB/90-7 - Minor Subdivision of 17,250 sq. ft. and 43,500 sq. t. lnto two ots of 21,750 sq. ft. and 39,000 sq. ft at 1912 No. Fifth St. in the RA, Si gle Family Residential Dist., Hazel Mueller, appl icant. 5. Set Public Hearing 0 te of December 18, 1990 for the following Planning Cases: a. Case No. SUB/90-7 - Minor Subdivision of two lots (one substandard) lnto two ots 0 4,215 sq. ft. and 26,946 sq. ft north of Willow St. between No. Secon St. and No. Third St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist., William & LaVonne Hubbard, applicants. b. Case No. SUP/90-7 - Special Use Permit to place an approximately one hun re sq. t. monument sign eight ft., six in. in height at "The Gardens" Townhouse development on McKusick Rd. in the RA, Single Family _ Residential Dist., Tom Elles, applicant. ~ c. Case No. SUP/90-7 - Special Use Permit for conversion of an existing secon loor 0 lce space into six apartments at 221 E. Chestnut St. in the CBD, Central Business Dist., Clark Nyberg, applicant. d. Case No. V/90-75 - Variance to the setback requirements for the placement of a gar ge six ft., six in. from the front property line (thirty ft. fronty rd setback required) at 813 W. Churchill St. in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Greg Cunningham. e. Case No. SUP/90-76 - Special Use Permit to conduct a three bedroom Bed Brea ast at 10 E. Laurel St. in the RB, Two Family Residential Dist., Clyde & Mar Jorgenson, applicants. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS STAFF REPORTS (Continued) COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM N WS MEDIA ADJOURNMENT e 2 e e e Memo to: Mayor and Council FrOM: City Coordinator Re: City Contribution toward Hosp./Med. IriS. Pr'emi \.H:l The City's monthly hospital/medical insurance premiuMs are presently as fo 11 O,"E,.: Sirtgle cover-'age }::2mi 1 y CCi\lef~'3qe ";j d..::;., bit- 21'3.. (;'3 The City prese~tly contributes S 83.54 (100~) toward sl~cle CGveraoe a~d and $ 205.00 toward family cc=verage. The labo~ aoreements speclt'i: "The Ei>1PLOYERS conh-'ibutic<n fOro. the per-'i,:,d begij'"fj",il'",g ,:'-n Jaj'"luary L 1991 and ending December 31, 1991 will be negotiated based on EMPLOYER contributions fc~ other City employees but will not in any event be les5 than the amount contributed by the EMPLOYER dm-'ing the year' ending December 31, 1990." The p'r'emium i-'ene\o'ial per-.iclc is Sel:.:terllbe-r 1, 1'391 .:((.d I lrJould e~.tiwate that the premiums will increase by at least 4~ to $ B7.00 and $ 228.00, respectively. In the past few years the City has paid 100~ of the fawily coverage for the eight wonth period preceeding the renewal date Il.e., Jan. 1 thru Aug. 31.) and the employee would pick up any increase in the cost fr'om Sept. 1 thr'u Dec. 31. If t.he CCr!J]'"lci I "Ie~~t? to c'Cli'"It i nlJt? thi s practice the City contribution should be set at $ 220.00. This is an increase of $15.00 per month and is the amount that was included in the 1991 budget. However, the Council is ~~t locked into this amount if the Council feels it is um-'ea~j'"iably high. This can be fm'the'(' disC'u':;sed at the meeting Tuesday (4:30 p.m.). ,.."",,\ I '7v/~ / ,I" ( e e e ~emo to: Mayctr a)~d Cour:cil From: City Coordinator He: Metro Council Oversight Pr"'e'qr'<3m Da: Nov. 12, 1990 AccoMpanying this Merna is the Co}~Y"e5pondence that I have received from Gene Fra~chett regarding an Qrqa~ization, Metra Relations, Inc., that he established to provide ongoing Met COLncil oversight. The program ~'IOlJld 2.1sc' P"('o\/ide c,.'....e.t-.sight to fr1t..jCC~ I bel ie\lf? t.he C.OY..i....r?::::.fjo.(ldef"!ce ad-- equatlely describes ttlE role that Metro Relations Irlc. would plav a~ld the benefits the City would derive from the program. The cost of the program for the City (see attached agreement) would be $1875.00. 1 personally believe that this is a reasonable amount to scend to have someone like Mr. Franchett overseeing the Met Council and the MWCC. This would reduce the time in-house staff spend discoverinq, re- viewing and analyzing Met Council and MWCC programs, activities and pCIl icies - c,fte'fl a time C'o'ns,umi'nq pr'oce<;:.~~-. Ther-ef:'r-'f?, I hc<uld r"'ee':'f:lfr1er,C that the Cou"i'"fcil cq:cj:(.j....o.ve the 8gr'eement: fO'r-' 1391 (thE' ~:n"'c~:p'-'2m t~c!-'.ld be evaluated during the course of the year to dete~Mine its value and be renewed or terminated accordingly). /)/~ METRO RELATIONS INC. To: City Managers/Administr~ From: Gene Franchett~, ~, ,/) Subject: Update on Me Waste Control Commission Analyses and Oversight Program November 8, 1990 As of this date 26 city managers have indicated that they will recommend the program to their respective city councils or utility commissions. Don Poss of Blaine is the first city manager to contract for the service. Some of you expressed an expectation that the program would be discussed at a future MAMA meeting. However, Bill Craig, MAMA President, has informed me that the MAMA programs for the rest of the year are already set, and this matter will not be on the agenda this year. Since the program has a January 1 start-up date, I would welcome any other opportunities to speak to groups or associations. I am scheduled to speak to a. group of northern Dakota County mayors and managers November 16. I still hope to have the opportunity to discuss the program with MAMA. Some of you have also inquired about the relationship to the AMM, and others have asked about the possibility of having the service be a contractual arrangement under the AMM. I feel quite strongly about the importance of effective coordination of joint municipal efforts. This sensitivity stems from my experience in directing the work of the AMM. I am committed to meet regularly with the AMM Metro Agencies Committee to assure consistency with AMM policies and to facilitate cooperation. As to a contractual arrangement with the AMM, it could certainly ease some of the demands on me for administration of the program. However, the AMM has a 19 percen t dues increase in 1991. Since the Metro Relations Inc-MWCC program is a new effort, it is probably not prudent to bring everything together at this time. One city manager suggested that perhaps the wisest course is to proceed with the program as an independent entity. After the program has been up and running and has a track record, then consider placing it under the AMM. This suggestion makes sense. The need is there now. The problem exists now. to do something effective about it is now! The opportunity Please call information. me if you have any questions or wish -additional c) ,z!> C.) r'\ ~.'-' ~ Best regards. 5913 Chowen South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 . (612) 926-6201 I METRO RELATIONS INC. October 1, 1990 e Nile Kriesel City Coordinator 216 4th St N StillwateJJ. MN 55082 NJ~ Dear *L. Leser: What is the most costly line item in many city budgets? What public agency pays many of the highest wages and fringe benefits in the metropolitan area? What public agency gets 95 percent of its $120,000,000 operating revenues from cities? What public agency that serves cities exclusively has no direct city voice in its affairs? The answer to all of these questions is: Control Commission. the Metropolitan Waste e The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) ranks right behind the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) with the second largest budget of all the metropolitan agencies. Contrary to the MTC, which receives its revenues from the fare box, the state government, the federal government, as well as a tax within each city, the MWCC gets 95 percent of its current $120,000,000 budget from the cities. That means the cities must come up with $114,000,000. And there is no opting out! The MWCC charges continue to grow. are forced to curtail some municipal revenues, the cost of wastewater historically unprecedented rates. At a time when many cities services because of reduced treatment is going up at The MWCC is not subject to any budgetary constraints such as the levy limit law imposed on cities. It can raise rates at will. THE PROBLEM: No one speaks for the cities. consistently and intensively watching the advocating the interests of cities. There is no do i n g a n a 1 y s est 0 ass u r e t hat MW C C act i v i tie s are necessary and in the interests of its users, There is no one Commission and one consistently and expenditures the cities. e Such lack of oversight has contributed to some known, and probably many unknown, excessive expenditures in the past. For example, at the present time many MWCC personnel and fringe benefit costs far exceed comparable municipal personnel and fringe benefi t costs . Yet, it is the cities which pay these costs. In addi tion, not only are these expendi tures a direct added cost through rate charges to cities, but a secondary cost is that such practice complicates municipal labor negotiations. 5913 Chowen South. Minneapolis. Minnesota 55410 . (612) 926-6201 I .' e e e THE SOLUTION: Metro Relations, Inc. has been established to provide an ongoing MWCC oversight, analysis and advocacy service for your city and other cities. It will assure the presence of the interests of cities at Commission discussions and deliberations. It will provide analyses of Commission issues from the municipal perspective, and will advocate, when appropriate, the interests of your city and others with the Commission. afford on its own to provide such service and in depth. Bu t by joint action, an on-going monitoring, analysis and advocacy service can be a very low individual municipal investment. No city can consistently professional provided for What are the BENEFITS? A major focus will be on keeping MWCC budget increases to absolute necessary levels. Success in keeping an MWCC budget increase down just I percent would save the cities over a million dollars in one year, and would multiply many times over the small investment in Metro Relations, Inc. For the first time your city and the other cities will have an on-going professional presence wi th the Commission, someone who knows the system and knows the process. The investment in Met ro Relations, Inc. is not competi ti ve with other general fund priorities, or such memberships as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities or the League of Minnesota Cities. Because the focus of Metro Relations, Inc. is ex c 1 u s i vel yon the MW C C , the c i t Y 's sub s c rip t ion fee can, and appropriately should, be a part of the municipal sewer service enterprise budget. To assure effective coordination Metro Relations Inc. will meet regularly with the appropriate Board committee of the the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. I will be the program's principal staff person. I have the qualifications and capabilities to make the program work effecti vely. I was Executive Director and Department Director for the Metropolitan Council. I know well the operations of the MWCC from these several years of oversight responsibilities and other more recent studies. I also understand the needs and concerns of cities. This stems from my term as Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. I know the system. I am skilled at working in the process. I will represent the participating cities well. e Support for the service is on a subscription basis. Subscription fees vary depending on the city's use of the wastewater system, ranging from a low of $1250 to a high of $5850. Compare these modest amounts to the charges you now pay to the MWCC. Enclosed are a list of questions and answers and an agreement to establish the city as a participating member. The agreement also sets forth the amount of the city's annual investment as a participating city. I look forward to this opportunity of service to make your city and others more effective in the metropolitan area. I will be pleased to meet wi th you at any time to discuss the proposal. e EEF. tm ,e I r"Q~ E. Franchett I e , QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS What is Metro Relations Inc.? Met ro Relations Inc. is a corpora tion established on behalf of cities to monitor closely the activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC), to analyze MWCC issues and to advocate the interests of participating cities with the MWCC. Why is Metro Relations Inc. necessary? The cities in this metropolitan area now pay well over $100,000,000 each year to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, yet ci ties have no direct voice in how or at what cost service is to be provided. Metro RelationsI~c. will conduct ongoing analyses of MWCC issues on behalf of participating cities, will be present at all Commission deliberations, will communicate regularly on MWCC issues with participating cities, and will advocate the interests of participating cities when appropriate. ~ Who decides what the Co..ission does? tit It is the Commission which decides what the Commission does, within the context of the broad policies laid down by the Metropolitan Council. Commissioners are appointed by the Metropolitan Council, which in turn is appointed by the Governor. The Chair of the MWCC is also appointed by the Governor. What viII Metro Relations Inc. do for the participating cities? Metro Relations Inc. will: 1. Represent the participating cities at Commission and Committee meetings. 2.. Analyze key MWCC issues of importance to participating cities. 3. Analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the budget -making process on behalf of the participating cities. 4. Advocate the interests of participating cities with the MWCC. 5. Report regularly to the participating cities on key MWCC issues. 1 e e It l ~ 6. Alert participating cities when issues before the Commission warrant immediate attention and action. Why is it necessary at this time to have cities represented with the MWCC? The costs of wastewater treatment are going up at historically unprecedented rates. Among other things, the MWCC now compensates some of its employees at salaries, wages and fringe benefits which far exceed those of cities. Cities pay these costs through their rates and SAC charges. These costs have now reached a level which warrants that the ci ties have a strong, informed, regular and consistent professional presence with the Commission, and keep themselves informed with ongoing analyses of key MWCC issues so that appropriate action can be taken. What will be the benefits? Money! Among other things. Succeeding in keeping proposed MWCC increases down just 1 Percent will multiply many times over the cities' small investment in Metro Relations Inc. Also, for the first time in the history of the Commission, there will be on-going analyses of MWCC issues and advocacy for the cities interests at all Commission deliberations. No city can afford to do this consistently on its own, yet it becomes extremely cost effective as a joint effort. How do we know Metro Relations Inc. will get results? Success depends on the capabilities, track record and commitment of the key person involved. The person committed to lead and staff this program is a top urban government professional with over twenty years experience. He is known to many city managers in the area with whom he has worked as a competent, capable and effective professional of high integrity. His background and experience have prepared him exceedingly well to undertake the program. He previously served as Executive Director of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and Executive Director of the Metropolitan Council, and has conducted his own government relations and planning firm for the past three years. 2 e e - ... Who is Gene Franchett? Eugene E. Franchett is owner and president of Metro Relations, Inc. He has directed his own firm of Gene Franchett and Associates, doing planning and government relations, for the past three years. His background is rich in government affairs including: Executive Director Metropolitan Council Department Director Metropolitan Council Executive Director Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Executive Director Governor's Task Force on Metropolitan Problems (Wisc.) Executive Director Fox Valley Council of Governments (Wisc.) He has written national award winning reports. He was named outstanding regional council executive director in the country in 1983 and outstanding public administrator in Minnesota. 3 ~ e e e AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 1990 between the ci ty of SJ7LL I1J .I3-.rlE /l- , Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City", and Metro Relations Inc., hereinafter referred to as "MRI". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to engage the services of MRI to monitor on behalf of the city the operations and activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, hereinafter referred to as "MWCC", to conduct research and analyses of MWCC matters, and to undertake related ac ti vi ties, and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the city to share the cost of such monitoring and analyses with other cities of like interests who shall also contract with MRI for this same purpose, and WHEREAS, MRI and its princi pal agent, Eugene E. Franchet t, is particularly knowledgeable and competent to conduct such monitoring and analyses NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows AGREEMENT A. Character and Extent of Seryices 1. MRI agrees to provide services as follows: a. To be present On behalf of the city and the other participating cities at MWCC commission meetings and committee meetings. b. To analyze key MWCC issues of importance to the city and the other participating cities. c. To analyze MWCC budgets and participate in the budget- making process on behalf of the city and the other participating cities and make recommendations on behalf of the participating cities. 1 ~ . ~ .. e d. To advocate the interests of the city in common with the other participating cities with the MWCC. e. To notify within a reasonable time the administrative officer of the city and the participating cities when MRI determines that issues the commission warrant immediate attention and action. chief other before f. To report in writing regularly to the city and the other participating cities on key MWCC issues. B. Compensation - 1. The services performed by MRI shall be paid by annual subscriptions by each participating municipality. The amount of each city's subscription shall vary from $1250 to $5850 per year depending on the extent of the city's use of the regional waste water treatment system. Within these parameters the annual subscription fee shall be approximately 0.2% of the MWCC estimated gross charge to the city for current costs for interceptor and treatment works (.002 x~urrent costs). The subscription fee for the city in 1991 is ~ /JY7j~. Such subscription fee shall be paid by the city as follows: One-half on or before February 1 of each year and one-half on or before August 1 of each year. C. Duration and Termination 1. This agreement is made contingent upon the execution of like contracts by not less than seven cities, and upon meeting that contingency MRI shall give written notice of the effectiveness of the contract to each city. 2. This agreement shall be in effect for one year commencing January 1, 1991 and ending December 31, 1991, HOWEVER it shall renew automatically each subsequent year unless Notice of Termination shall be given pursuant to Paragraph (a) following. a. Either the city or MRI may terminate this agreement by giving the other party written notice on or before October 1 of any year giving notice of termination at the end of that calendar year; and the agreement shall continue until the effective date of such termination. A notice of termination may be rescinded by either party at any time. e c. This agreement shall be terminated at the end of the calendar year when the number of participating municipalities is reduced to less than the number of participating municipalities required to put the agreement into effect. 2 e - - ,# It . . I D. Miscellaneous 1. Execution of this Agreement does not create a contract of employment. MRI and Eugene E. Franchett are and shall remain independent contractors, therefore the city shall not be responsible for payment of social security or withholding taxes, nor for unemployment or worker's compensation insurance or other benefits. 2. If the city resolves to retain MRI to pursue a matter of special interest with the MWCC it may do so provided the matter is not in conflict with the interests of the other participating ci ties, and MRI shall recei ve an addi tional fee for such services which shall be based on its standard per diem fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. City By: Its By: Its / Date cJci- /7, / ~/70 Date 3 e e ~ BLOOMINGTON BROOKLYN PARK BURNSVlllE CHAMPLIN CIRCLE PINES COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DEEPHA VEN EDEN PRAIRIE EDINA FRIDLEY GREENWOOD HASTINGS HOPKINS lAUDERDAlE MAPLE PLAIN MAPlEWooD MINNETONKA MINNETRISTA NEW BRIGHTON NORTH ST. PAUL ORONO OSSEO PLYMOUTH RICHFielD ROBBINSDAlE ROSEVlllE SAVAGE ST. lOUIS PARK SHAKOPEE SHOREVIEW SPRING PARK WAYZATA WEST ST. PAUL WOqDlAND - , . ~~- ;j)~ ~ 4JM ~ iV'-tf ~ h~~.-v\.{) ~ ~ n,;L1 ~u:L-~ V\;\ ~t;'v{) ~0t~' \l~ W~ ~~~~ ev.0tM. \Vl~ ~~\.- i~' SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY November 8, 1990 , 5l.-c/(A Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk City of Stillwater Stillwater City Hall 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Suburban Rate Authority-MWCC Dear Ms. Johnson: You probably have by now received a proposal from Metro Relations, Inc. (MRI) to monitor activities of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission on behalf of cities. MRl's proposal makes no reference to the Suburban Rate Authority's (SRA) activities in this area, and the SRA was not contacted by MRI about it. As you may recall from our previous mailing to your city, the SRA is a joint powers organization of cities formed in 1963 to regulate and participate in rate regulation of public utilities on behalf of its municipal members. Several years ago, SRA's joint powers agreement was amended to permit it to participate in matters growing out of relations between the MWCC and SRA members. Since that time the SRA has been quite active in the area, dealing directly with the MWCC on a host of issues, keeping its members informed of Commission activities, and establishing a good working relationship with the Commission. If your City sees merit in a cooperative venture with other cities in monitoring the MWCC - and we think you will- we urge you to consider SRA membership. The cost is low, the effect on the Commission is persuasive, and SRA membership provides an array of other benefits to the City and its public utility customers. We think the MRI proposal lays out some strong reasons for your City joining the SRA. We'd appreciate your sharing this letter with your City Council. Si/jr1' / 1 ~~ Robert DeGhetto . Chairman, SRA Executive Committee cc: Jim Strommen Dave Kennedy Glenn Purdue Executive Committee 470 PILLSBURY CENTER · MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 · (612) 337-9300 e METRO RELATIONS INC. Re: Metropolitan Wast~ontrol Commission Program From: Gene Franchett~ ~~~~ You probably receive a recently a letter regarding our MWCC program from the Suburban Rate Authority (SRA). The letter reinforces and amplifies the need for effective oversight, analyses and advocacy on behalf of ci ties in dealing wi th the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Cities have gone without such service for a long time. Though not exp 1 ici t 1 y stated, the let ter rai ses another serious issue for all of us: the importance of coordination and getting maximum results from the scarce resources that cities have to invest in such services. The SRA has performed a needed service for reviewing rate increases with pri va tely owned specifically NSP and Minnegasco. many years in utilities, most When I met for breakf ast on Augus t 20 with SRA Chairman Bob DeGhetto to explain what MRI is, he pointed out that SRA had on occasion looked at some MWCC issues, most notably the fairness of state support for the Minneapolis-St. Paul-South St. Paul sanitary/storm sewer separation, but that the focus was primarily on the private utilities. Upon subsequent review of the SRA Joint and Cooperative Agreement, I learned that the SRA is already locked into its expenditure maximum and member dollar assessments for 1991. The agreement has no provision for assessment modification. I concluded it is futile to pursue the SRA to finance such an effort, since the agreement would not permit additional assessments until 1992. Some city managers indicated other reasons for not pursuing the SRA. I would point out, however, that this much needed MWCC oversight and analyses service can stand alone. If the cities so desire, it can be moved to any of the municipal associations. But first, it must be up and running, and the need is now. Back to the issue of coordina tion, which is cri tically important. In order to assure effective coordination with the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities I am committed to meet regularly with the Metro Agencies Committee. I am ready to work out a similar appropriate arrangement with the SRA as well. I am very sensitive to the issue of effective coordination, especially as it is perceived by those on the outside. The bottom line is that no one is providing an in-depth and consistent professional oversight and analyses service on. behalf of cities with the MWCC. The experience and frustrations of many city managers and mayors is testimony to that. MRI will provide that service with a top professional who knows the system from the inside, and for a very modest municipal investment. ~~\:) CO "- <~. 5913 Chowen South . Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 . (612) 926-6201 .~ e e e . . MefllCl t CI : F t-'om : Re: Mayor and Council City Coordil'"lstor Price Quotations for Recycling Bins Nov. 15, 1 '3'30 Da: /J/j ~ Accompanying this memo is a summary of price Quotations the City receiy- ed on recycling containers. The price ranges are 2S follows: 11 gall or, .~ t:. 35 \;::' ':'> c 95 .~ (C~b, 75~1-2g, 800) ~. ...!. 14 ga Ilcll'", .. '35 to 4. ita \19, 750~22 , 2:QI!Z1) ~'. 17-18 gal 10"(', 4. El7 to 5. 17 (24, 350-25, 85121) 2 ill + gal lo'{t c 15 to 7. 30 {25, 75121-36, 5~:tli.l ) ..J. Lids '..- ~t:" to 4. 1Z13 ( 1 1, 750-20, 150) .... ~.....{ * (cos.t pet~ 500li) ) If the City's recycling container grant application is approved then 50~ of the cost would be reimbursed to the City from the Met Council. The City must include the type and cost of the container in it's application and the application must be submitted by November 26, 1990. ~he Solid Waste Advisory Committee is meeting this coming Monday to make it's findings and recommendation for your consideration Tuesday night. I am also providing you with some info on the containers and will have at 439-6121 if yc!u have any questions. a sample of each container at the meeting. Please feel free to call me /J1~ .. ... SUlIIlIat1' of Price Quotations e For Recycling Containers Container Price Cover Price % Recycled ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vendor Type Dimensions Size Material Each 4,000 5,000 Each 4,000 5,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buckhorn #75-522 241 x 20W x 10-3/8H 17 gal. Up to 25% $4.87 $19,480.00 $24,350.00 $2.50 $10,000.00 $12,500.00 #75-320 241 x 20W x 12- 3/8H 20 gal. Up to 25% $5.15 $20,600.00 $25,750.00 $2.50 $10,000.00 $12,500.00 Lewis Systems #2116-13 20.9L x 15.6W x 13.3H 14 gal. 20% $4.46 $17,840.00 $22,300.00 N/A N/A NIA #2616-14 25.9L x 16W x 14H 18 gal. 20% $5.26 $21,040.00 $26,300.00 $4.03 $16,120.00 $20,150.00 Rehrig Husky lite single bin 21.7L x 16W x 13H 14 gal. 15% - 20% $4.03 $16,120.00 $20,150.00 f To \3E P Fto V '11) E1) f Husky lite single bin 25.25L x 17.6W x 13.5H 18.2 gal 15% - 20% $5.17 $20,680.00 $25,850.00 RB-R Ribbed (stackable) 20.125L x 15.25W x 12.4H 11.85 gal. 15% - 25% $5.35 $21,400.00 $26,750.00 NIA NIA N/A RB-SS (stackable) 20.125L x 15.25W x 12.4H 11 gal. 15% - 25% $5.96 $23,840.00 $29,800.00 N/A N/A N/A Shamrock RC 2000 23.3L x 13.7W x 17.8H 23.5 gal 50%* $7.30 $29,200.00 $36,500.00 $2.35 $9,400.00 $11,750.00 *optional wheels = $3.50 each Model 748 (stackable) 2O.6L x 15W x 12.6H 11.37 gal. 50% $5.50 $22,000.00 $27,500.00 NIA N/A NIA Model 695 241 x 17W x 13.8H 20.95 gal. 50% $5.67 $22,680.00 $28,350.00 NIA N/A N/A _liP Corporation 14 gal. rectangular 23.8L x 18W x 11.56H 14 gal. 20% - 25% $3.95 $15,800.00 $19,750.00 $2.50 $10,000.00 $12,500.00 18 gal. rectangular 23.8L x 18W x 15.06H 18 gal. 20% - 25% $4.95 $19,800.00 $24,750.00 $2.50 $10,000.00 $12,500.00 .. .,,- e Buckhorn Recycling Containers ITEM DIMENSIONS STD. PACK PACK NO. DESCRIPTION L x W x H CARTON/PALLET WT. LBS. CUBE 75-245 Paper-Thiner 12-118" x 12-118" x 13-118" 180 420 112 cu. ft. 75-320 Recycling Container 24" x 20" x 12-3/8" Floor StackedlNo Pack 75-522 Recycling Container 24-5/16" x 16-5/16" x 10-13/16" 175 982 114 cu. ft. 75-019 Stack-N-Tie 19" x 16" x 13" 312 836 112 cu. ft. 75-605 Paper-Thiner 16-1116" x 16-1116" x 8-3/16" 60 215 112 cu. ft. 75-610 Recycling Container 20" x 16" X 12" Floor Stacked/No Pack 57-611/612/613 Recycling Container 20-3/4" x 15-5/8" x 12" Floor Stacked/No Pack 55 W. TechneCenter Drive .ord, Ohio 45150 -831-4402 800-543-4454 (National) 800-582-2017 (Ohio) 513-831-5474 (Fax) Buckhorn Canada 2775 Slough Street Mississauga, Ontario L4T 1G2 416-678-6545 416-678-9482 (Fax) Buckhorn Ltd. Witney Trading Estate Station Lane, Unit 4 Witney, Oxon OX8 6YT United Kingdom (0993) 773551 (0993) 776671 (Fax) Form No. 89152 . BUC~HQB~~r ft ~J This sheet is printed on recycled paper. NOS2116-13 ~ kUII~ . 14-gallon container holds 2 kraft (grocery) bags full of recyclables for source separation. · Easy-to-grip pocket han- dles are large enough to fit a gloved hand. . Optional dividers can separate the bin into halves or thirds. . Large hot stamp area on aI/ sides provides easy identification. Sequential numbering available. . Containers nest inside each other to save space during transit and storage. Nest stops prevent container jamming to aI/ow easy bin distribution. . Manufactured with up to 20% post consumer material-equal to 4 plastic milk containers. . Light-stabilized color pig- ment prevents fading. DESCRIPTION: This lightweight recycling container is designed to be used as a single, commingled bin or in a multi-bin stacking system. Seamless, one-piece injection-molded, high-density polyethylene material provides durability and long service life. Contoured SPECIFICATIONS Outside Top (inches) W Oimensions: Outside Bottom (inches) L W Inside Bottom (inches) L W Container Nesting Volume Weight Ratio (gallons) (Ibs) Wall Thickness (inches) NOS2116-13 20.9 15.6 13.3 16.9 12.5 18.7 14.4 16.7 12.3 6.6:1 . Unique stacking tabs allow 9O-degree offset cross stack- ing to conserve floor space. . 5-year warranty: all bins are date-stamped for warranty tracking. . SPI material code identification for container recycling. · Specially designed bottom allows pooling of up to 9 oz. of liquid. Eight drain holes (.25") prevent excess accumulation. Also available without drain holes. . Reinforced %" rim can be hooked on trucks for easy curbside sortation. . Large SY2" cross stack opening accepts bulky items like milk containers. bottoms and corners make handling safe. The container is temperature resistant from -25 degrees F to more than 120 degrees F to handle hot summers or cold winters. Ultraviolet stabilizers prevent material breakdown due to sunlight, keep- ing the containers looking new for years. Standard colors: blue, green. Liquid Ouantity per Hot Stamp Pooling TruCkload Pocket Area Amount fPalletized and Handle Order (Inches) W&H (oz.) shrink wrapped) (inches) W&D Requirements 8.0 x 7.75 With or End 9 6.552 4 xl Without 9.5 x 8.75 Drain Holes, Side Color. 14 3.5 .90 LEWISystems r....y....' MENASHA CORPORATION 1-800-999-TOTE t::I>. Printed on recycled ~ and recyclable paper. . ..""""""~-'-""'." .. . l8-gallon capacitynolds 3 kraft (grocery) bags of recyclables plus newspapers. . Unique stacking tabs allow 90-degree offset cross stack- ing to conserve floor space. . Manufactured with up to 20% post consumer material-equal to 5 plastic milk containers. t . Easy-to-grip pocket handles are large enough to fit a gloved hand. . Light-stabilized color pigment prevents fading. . Reinforced 11,-f' rim can be hooked on trucks for easy curbside sortation. . Containers nest inside each other to save space during transit and storage. Nest stops prevent container jamming to allow easy bin distribution. . Large 9" cross stack opening accepts bulky items like milk cartons. . Large hot stamp ar a on all sides provides e sy identification. Seq ential numbering availab e. . Specially designed bottom allows pooling of up to 15 oz. of liquid. Four drain holes (.375") prevent excess accumulation. Also available without drain holes. II . 5-year warranty: al bins are date-stamped for arranty tracking. DESCRIPTION: This lightweight 18-gallon recycling contamer is designed to be used as a single, commingled bin or in a m Iti-bin stacking system. Seamless, one-piece injection-molded, hi h-density polyethylene material provides durability and long se ice life. Contoured bottoms and corners make handling safe. The container is temperature resistant from -25 degrees F to more than 120 degrees F to handle hot summers or cold winters. Ultraviolet stabilizers prevent material breakdown due to sunlight. keep- ing the containers looking new for years. Standard colors: blue, green. SPECIFICATIONS Dimensions: Model: L Container Nesting Volume Weight Ratio (gallons) (Ibs) Wall Thickness (inches) liQuid Quantity per Hot Stamp Pooling TruCkload Pocket Area Amount (Palietized and Handle Order (inches) W&H (oz.) shrink wrapped) !inches) W&O ReQuirements 6.0 x 10.Q With Of End 15 4.536 4.5 x 1 Without 10.0 x 10.0 Drain Holes, Side ColO!. NOS2616-14 25.9 16.0 14.0 21.7 13.0 23.2 14.5 21.05 12.3 6.6:1 18.5 5.15 .105 LEWISystems '.11......11..' MENASHA CORPORATION 1-800-999- TOTE 11>.. Printed on recycled ~ and recyclabll' paper. .. ....... \ 6--: ~_-:-.-- ;,~.('" ':!?:';W""'. c> ~s ~D [0 en Ul 1---1 \ CJ :D \ll c> () -'7 \ L- --\ )> 1--'-1 -7 L.- \\l eJ] -fl \ () \ \ )] \ -0 - \ ""J;> -0 LOX .- \\1 -4~ z > Z lO (1 0 .- J] ?'I n _rntn ~-4 :1: o I'n () I ..... rn x (j) ~\] Q> :c. LOZ --\ \I P II . rn ..... eCJ -J \I .'- U1 . a N lO )> a lJ \ \ .62.5 . lO -7 w ~ ol-.. L- a Q) lJl . (-) C JJ O.J Ul I---i 0 fll n I C) ~ L_ I -1 )> 1---1 -7 L._ rll JJ --fl CJ JJ C") (-- )> (J) (f) '" -. '-., ~. . -. Xl [O~ J \Jl VI e ... . ~ '-.... llll~ l~L.) . . .}{e~r~ '~1ft~OJllllan~ e 4010 East 26th Street Los Angeles, CA 90023 (213) 262-5145 FAX 269-8506 CURBSIDE RECYCLE CONTAINERS SINGLE BIN SYSTEMS 14 GALLON BIN e DIMENSIONS LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT Exterior: 21.75" x 16.00" x 13.00" top Interior: 17.50" x 12.50" x 12.60" bottom Capacity: Weight: Nesting ratio: Min. wall thickness: 14.0 gallons 4.0Ibs. 6.5 to 1 100 mils side 110 mils bottom ACCESSORI ES * Two section divider DESIGN FEATURES * Injection molded HOPE construction designed for strength and long life. * Ultra-violet stabilizers added to prevent fading or material breakdown. * May include up to 25% post-consumer recycled plastic. * 5-year prorated warranty against defects in material or workmanship. * Available in a wide range of colors. e NEST~D BINS FOR SHIPPING * Choice of branding areas for logos and recycling slogans. * Large sturdy handles to ease carrying to curb. * Designed for optional divider. * Recessed bottom to contain liquids. * Four raised drain holes in bottom. * Tabs to secure plastic grocery bags. * Cross-stackable for multi-bin systems. STACKING CONFIGURATION ~. r. '\~ 1-:1,..1 ' ew~ 'a~ifj( ~omllan~ (:.~.. \, . .' 4010 East 26th Street Los Angeles, CA 90023 (213) 262-5145 FAX 269-8506 _-: 11 ~ ... e CURBSIDE RECYCLE CONTAINERS SINGLE BIN SYSTEMS 18 GALLON BIN DIMENSIONS LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT Exterior: 25.25" x 17.60" x 13.50" top Interior: 20.25" x 14.00" x 13.00" bottom Capacity: Weight: Nesting ratio: Min. wall thickness: 18.2 gallons 5.0Ibs. 5.5 to 1 110 mils side 120 mils bottom ACCESSORI ES * Two and three section dividers. * Domed snap-on lid. * Wheel kit installed without tools. DESIGN FEATURES * Injection molded HOPE construe ion designed for strength and long life. * Ultra-violet stabilizers added to prevent fading or material breakdown. * May include up to 25% post-con umer recycled plastic. * 5-year prorated warranty against defects in material or workmanship. * Available in a wide range of colo s. NESTED BINS FOR SHIPPING * Choice of branding areas for logos and recycling slogans. * Large sturdy handles to ease carrying to curb. * Designed for optional divider. * Recessed bottom to contain liquids. * Four raised drain holes in bottom. * Tabs to secure plastic grocery bags. * Cross-stackable for multi-bin systems. CH^NNELS PROVIDE STRENGTH ~ MULTI-6IN ST^CK^6ILITY DOME SH^PE PERMITS W^TER OR^IN^GE EINFORCED RIM OR ^DDED STRENGTH LI PS OVER TO PREVENT SPILL^GE BIN WITH STACKABLE LID R e eye lin g Conta in e rs ~ /T"""~V~"- That Keep the Consumer in Mind e L':~,!~r~rr:'~~':?~1fh. ._' (' :,: r::' ~. ; t e After all, it's the consumers that make or break your curbside recycling program. Shamrock Industries, Inc., a national leader in both the plastics industry and the curbside recycling container market, has a user friendly recycling container to fit every need. .. -" .. RC200afM...the cadillac of the industry One-Step recyclers are available in three handy sizes...7-gallon, 14-gallon and 26-gallon Stackables are made with up to 100% post- consumer plastics Our innovative product line includes: Three-Bagger heavy-duty 21-gallon container · The only containers designed with aesthetics in mind to encourage in-home use. · A wide variety of sizes and types to fit both commingled and source separated programs. · The only container available with optional lid and wheels. · The use of up to 100% true post-consumer plastics, making Shamrock the industry leader. _Call today for details on how you can use Shamrock containers to create a successful curbside recycling program. s~ms~2~t\!@ Recycling Division 834 North 7th Street Minneapolis, MN 55411-4394, U.S.A. (612) 332-2100; 1-800-822-2342 (Toll Free); 1-800-822-2343 (In MN) @ @ Designed with the household and hauler in mind, all Shamrock curbside recycling containers are: ~ Printed on recycled paper. ~fl4~f1 rK 0 C< R .. 2000™ Recycling Container I · esigned to hold three full grocery bags of recyclables. · 7.75" height fully encloses bags, preventing litter. . esthetically designed for in-home use. . ptionallid and wheel kits available...industry firsts. · 3.5 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 17.84"H x 23.28"W x 13.66"0. · ests or stacks with or without lids. e ne-Step Recycler esthetically designed for in-home use. . hree sizes to fit a wide variety of needs-7, 14, and 26 gallon. · ptional snug fitting lids and metal carrying/locking handles. . I entical shape of all three sizes results in instant recognition t roughout the community. · 6.5 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 22.50"H x 17.25"W x 17.25"D. 4.25 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 18"H x 14.50"W x 14.50"0. · .6 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 14.25"H x 11.38"W x 11.38"0. tackable Recycling Container · olid wall construction for safety and to minimize weather and round problems. · ouble-reinforced handles for easy carrying. · nits stack securely with interlocking feet. . ade with up to 100% recycled plastics. · 1.37 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 11.25"H x 17.50"W x 13.50"0. e hree-Bagger Recycling Container olds three large grocery bags plus additional room for corrugated r extra paper. · ounded top lid makes a comfortable handle. · esigned with extra height to protect contents and keep them nside bags. · ptional wheel kit available. · 0.95 gallon capacity-top 1.0. 13.87"H x 24"W x 17.25"0. . vailable with a blend of "true household post-consumer" esin-up to 100% in some models. · uaranteed and fully proven to perform in temperature extremes from -30 degrees to +130 degrees F. · Made from strong resilient polyethylene. . Built with solid wall construction for safety and to minimize the onsequences of wind, rain, insects, and litter. · Available in a wide variety of colors and with customized imprints. · Molded with external handles for comfortable carrying. · Designed with drain holes but have a reservoir for casual spillage. e 05-60.7-295 ., - .- '" ~ ' .....~ Curbside Recycling Containers e.From the Tulip Corporation Successful recycling programs demand strong community participation and awareness. Statistics prove the highest participation rates have been in programs where containers have been supplied to the residents. Supplying Tulip's heavy duty containers will encourage residents to become part of the solid waste solution and demonstrate your city's commitment to that effort. FEATURES: -Injection molded from impact resistant high density polyethylene. - Ultra violet stabilizers prevent breakdown due to sunlight. - Drainage system prevents liquid seepage in the home, while allowing precipitation to drain at curbside. - Post consumer recycled material may be specified (Tulip's Proprietary Blend). - City logo can be permanently hot stamped onto containers. -Laboratory tested to -200 F. -Tulip Recycling containers are available at any of our five conveniently located plants. \1) V - -'" - .. .. - ------- ----..--. -----..- ------ - - .. -. .. - --'.'-'-'''-'--'-'~' __H_ __...._.._._... 18 Gallon also available. 14 Gallon. For commingling. Also accommodates 3 grocery bags or dividers for source separation. 5 Gallon - Great for apartments or condos. 13 Gallon- For commingling or source separation of recyclables. TULIP CORPORATION - CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS: .211 E. 26th STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90023 TELEPHONE (213) 263-9001 - FAX (213) 261-4281 - TLX 910-321-3063 MOLDED PRODUCTS PLANT LOCATIONS 3211 E. 26th Street 3125 Highland Ave. 4044 N. 31st St. 714 E. Keefe Ave. 197 Main SI. Los Angeles, CA 90023 Niagara Falls, NY 14305 Milwaukee,WI53216 Milwaukee,WI53212 Springville, AL35146 213-263-9001 716-282-1261 414-445-5555 414-963-3120 205-467-6181 FAX 213-261-4281 FAX 716-285-6075 FAX 414-445-0440 FAX 414-962-1825 FAX 205-467-7079 ,a '-;---.'.- i .... RECYCLIN CONTAINER SPECIFICATIONS e Rectangular 14 GALLON 18 GALLON Length - 23.80 inches Width - 18.00 inches Height - 11.56 inches Weight - 4.0 Ibs. Wall Thickness - 1.00 m I Length - 23.80 inches Width - 18.00 inches Height - 15.06 inches Weight - 4.8 Ibs. Wall Thickness - 1.00 mil FEATURES (14 and 18 Gallon only) o Cross stackable f r multi-bin program expansion o Four molded-in h ndles o Recessed drainage system/holds 16 ounces of fluid before drainage ( ptional) o Anti-slide, texture bottom o Lock in dividers a ailable for source separation o Accommodates tree grocery bags for source separation o Extra capacity lid available o City logo hot-sta ped on container o Laboratory tested to -20 degrees o Injection molded f om high density polyethylene, which may contain a percent ge of post consumer recycled material, when specified o All our raw materi I contains an ultra violet stabilizer and an anti-oxident additi e to protect the product from sunlight and longterm hea exposure e Round 5 GALLON 13 GALLON Height - 14.00 inches Width - 11.90 inches Weight - 2.0 Ibs. Wall Thickness - 90 mil Bail Handle Drain Holes Optional Height - 14.90 inches Width - 18.90 inches Weight - 3.2 Ibs. Wall Thickness - 90 mil Handle - 360 degrees Drain Holes Optional . Printed on Recycled Paper " - SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE e REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL ON VOLUME BASE FEES NOVEMBER 19, 1990 e e e e I. II. III. IV. V. APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION VOLUME BASE FEE OPTIONS BILLING AND COLLECTION SCENARIOS COSTS ANALYSIS/PRICING RECOMMENDATION EXHIBIT "A" Present Average Monthly Cost per Household EXHIBIT liB" Estimated Annual Cost of Present Solid Waste Program EXHIBIT II Cft Estimated Average Cost of 30# of Waste EXHIBIT "D" Estimated Number of 30# Bags/Containers of Waste EXHIBIT liE" Estimated Waste Tonnage 1 2 3 5 5 A B C D E .'.<~ e I. INTRODUCTION On July 17, 1990, the Stillwater City Council directed the Solid Waste Advisory Committee to study and develop a plan for the implementation of a volume base fee system. This charge was consistent with the following goals and objectives that were established for the Solid Waste Advisory Committee by the City Council on October 11, 1989: 1. To reduce the overall volumes of solid waste; 2. To remove certain types of waste from the waste stream; 3. To maintain a disposal system that is efficient, complete and cost effective; and 4. To develop a pricing system that establishes a fair and equitable fee relationship to waste quantities generated by and disposed of for the user. The Solid Waste Advisory Committee had previously prepared a report (dated May 2, 1989) that led to the development of a voluntary recycling program within the City of stillwater in September of 1989. The report by the Committee anticipated that a volume base fee system would become necessary in order to increase the household recycling participation rate. More specifically, the Committee noted that "the City's rate structure does not provide the economic incentives that individual households will need to encourage them to reduce waste by recycling or by other methods". e Although the first step taken to reduce waste from the landfill waste stream when the present recycling system was implemented, further steps are now necessary to maximize the amount of waste that can be reasonably expected to be eliminated from the waste stream. Perhaps the next step to take is to recognize that waste management remains a serious problem and the solution to the problem will necessitate changes. Changes not only in how we handle waste but also how we are charged for waste collection and disposal. Some of these changes will not be popular. A number of residents, perhaps even a majority of the residents, will not appreciate any changes from the City's present solid waste collection and disposal system which is basically an unlimited volume, uniform rate system. It is certainly a convenient system. However, it bears repeating that it is not a system that is conducive to waste elimination. In developing a recommendation for volume base fees, the Committee reviewed the City's present system as well as systems developed by other cities in the metro area. Although the systems varied in terms of what material was picked up, who did the billing (i.e., the contractor or the City) and what was charged for the material, the commonality is that almost all of the cities have adopted some form of volume base fees. For example, a survey of 20 metro area cities conducted by the City of Columbia Heights in 1989 indicated that only three cities, Columbia Heights, St. Louis Park and Stillwater provide unlimited collection of waste without having a volume base fee system. st. Louis Park does provide incentives and disincentives for residents who participate or who do not participate in their recycling system. e According to the survey, a typical system would be as follows: 1 ~ Limited volume for refuse with increasing charges for 30, 60 and 90 gallon containers. Large items (furniture, TV's, household items, etc.) accepted for extra charge. White goods (refrigerators, stoves, washers, dryers, other applicants, etc.) accepted for an extra charge. Yard waste collection is split between including the cost in the base fee and charging extra for the waste. (Note: The survey did not indicate whether or not other waste such as tires, batteries, construction material, metals, etc., were collected and on what basis the material was collected and charged for) . A number of the cities also use a sticker or coupon system to charge residents for extra waste. A few cities require the hauler to account for and bill residents for extra waste. II. VOLUME BASE FEE OPTIONS In analyzing all available information, the Committee determined that the following options were available to the City of Stillwater: t Option No. 1 - A. Establish a base fee which would include 30 gallons of household waste and charge extra for each additional 30 gallons of household waste. B. All other waste collection (i.e., large goods, white goods, clean up days, metals, brush and yard waste) would be included in the base fee. Option No. 2 - A. Establish a three (3) tiered base fee for 30, 60 and 90+ gallons of normal household waste. The fee would vary according to volume. Residents would initially select the fee (volume) appropriate for their household and would be charged extra for each additional 30 gallons of waste (in excess of the base volume they selected). B. All other waste collection (i.e., large goods, white goods, clean up days, metals, brush and yard waste) would be included in the base fee. Option No. 3 - I A. Establish a base fee for normal household waste similar to either Option No. 1 or No.2. 2 It tit e B. Establish a fee schedule for all other types of waste except brush and yard waste. Brush and yard waste would be included in base fees. C. Discontinue cleanup days. 1. Brush would continue to be allowed to be brought to old landfill on Myrtle street. Option No. 4 - A. Establish a base fee for normal household waste similar to either Option No. 1 or No.2. B. Establish a fee schedule for all other types of waste. C. Discontinue clean up days. Option No. 5 - A. Establish fees for unlimited collection of normal household waste. B. Establish a fee schedule for all other types of waste. C. Discontinue cleanup days. Option No. 6 - A. Leave system as is except require mandatory recycling. Option No. 7 - A. Leave system as is except provide rebates to households that recycle and penalties (additional fees) to households that don't. (See description of program established by city of st. Louis Park.) B. Increase education/promotion activities to increase public awareness and recycling participation. (Note: This should be done regardless of what option is chosen) If the city adopts a volume base fee system (i.e., Options 1 through 4), it will be necessary to develop a system for accounting for and collecting for "extra" waste. It will also be necessary to establish prices for extra waste that are reasonable and assure that the revenues match collection and disposal costs. III _ BILLING AND COLLECTION SCENARIOS The Committee has identified possible billing and collection scenarios for the Council to consider and has also developed some cost information pertaining to the City's Solid Waste Program. The cost data is shown on the attached Exhibits. However, the cost data may need to be refined through review and 3 e discussion with the City's solid waste contractor. The scenarios are as follows: 1. The City could provide 30 gallon bags to the resident to be used for all household waste. The cost of each bag would be consistent with the volume base pricing concept. The City would provide and account for the containers thereby minimizing additional record keeping for the hauler. The containers could be sold at City Hall and/or major retail outlets such as CUB FOOD and Hooley's. The cost for the City to purchase and sell the bags (approximately 370,000 per year) would be about 21 cents per bag or about $78,000 per year. The monthly per household cost increase (just to purchase and sell the bags) would be about $1.33. 2. The Ci ty could provide containers (e. g ., 30 gallon bags) only for household waste in excess of the base volume established for the residence. The cost of the containers would be consistent with the volume base pricing concept. The City would provide and account for the containers. However, if the base volume varied for each residence, the contractor would have to maintain a volume-by-residence list in order to determine whether an additional charge was needed. This would create additional work for the contractor and would possible degrade collection time. Operating costs would probably increase thereby creating additional costs per household. e The containers would be sold at City Hall and/or major retail outlets such as CUB FOOD and Hooley 's. The cost for the City to purchase and sell the bags (approximately 112,500 per year) would be about 21 cents per bag or about $24,000 per year. The monthly per household cost increase (just to purchase and sell the bags) would be about 40 cents. 3. The City could provide stickers/tags to be placed on containers (the resident would supply their own container) for waste in excess of the base volume established for a residence. The City would sell and account for the stickers/tags. However if the base volume varied for each residence, the contractor would have to maintain a volume-by-residence list in order to determine whether a sticker/tag is needed. This would create additional work for the hauler and would possibly degrade collection time. Operating costs would probably increase thereby creating additional costs per household. The stickers/tags would be sold at City Hall over the counter and by mail. The cost for the stickers/tags (approximately 125,000 per year) would be about $1,000 per year. The monthly per household cost increase would be negligible. e 4. The City could require the contractor to account for and bill for waste in excess of the base volume established for the residence. The contractor would have to maintain a volume-by-residence list in order to determine the amount to be billed. This would create additional work for the contractor and would also degrade collection time. Operating costs would probably increase thereby creating additional costs per household. 4 e 5. For each of the options described above, the City could either include collection of extra household types of waste such as appliances, furniture, tires, batteries, grass/leaves/brush, etc., or establish a fee schedule for these items. The contractor would have to account for the material and would probably bill for these items (the billing could also be done by the City based on information provided by the contractor) thereby creating additional work for the contractor. Collection time would probably not be significantly degraded. However, operating costs would probably increase thereby creating additional costs per household. IV. COST ANALYSIS/PRICING Perhaps the most difficult problem to solve in establishing a volume base fee system is the one associated with pricing. Disposal costs as well as operating costs vary depending upon the type of waste being collected and disposed. e The cost data submitted with this report/recommendation was developed by the City Coordinator based on estimated waste tonnage and collection (operating) and disposal costs provided by the Solid Waste Contractor. The City Coordinator used an "averaging" technique to develop the costs. Therefore, actual costs of collecting and disposing of a specific type of waste could vary enough to create an unfavorable variance between projected revenues and actual revenues. For example, according to Exhibit "C", the cost to collect and dispose of ~ waste is 1.665 per 30# bag. (Extra waste for this example is defined as waste in excess of 30# per household per week.) It is also estimated that there are 112,400 "extra" 30 gallon bags per year (see Exhibit "D"). If the City were to adopt a volume base fee system similar to Option No. 1 and reduce the monthly household collection fee by the monthly cost attributed to "extra" household waste ($3.19 per Exhibit "A"), the revenue collected from base fees and "extra" fees would be $790,620 (4,890 h.h. x $16.42 ~ 3.19 x 12 mo.) and $187,708 ($1.67 x 112,400) respectively. This would match the revenues ($790,620 + 187,708 ; 978,328) needed to pay for the present solid waste collection and disposal cost of $963,700 (see Exhibit "B"). If, however, the "extra" bags are over estimated, the revenues would be lower - how much depends on the amount of error in the estimate (obviously the reverse would be true if the "extra" bags are under estimated). The problem would be compounded if the City were also to charge extra for grass/leaves, brush and/or other types of waste. In any event, the City should work with the contractor to refine the estimates to insure that revenues match costs if a program change is made. V. RECOMMENDATION The Committee believes that the most viable option at this time is Option No. 1 as follows: e A. Establish a base fee which would include 30 gallons of. household waste and charge extra for each additional 30 gallons of household waste. 5 ..._,t~ B. All other waste collection (i.e., large goods, white goods, clean up days, metals, brush and yard waste) would be included in the base fee. The Committee makes this recommendation because it does not involve a drastic change from the present system. Further, this system targets household waste for removal from the waste stream. Admittedly, the system does not address all aspects of solid waste volume. However, household waste is the type of waste that is most easily reduced by a household either through changes in shopping habits (i.e., selecting product containers made from recyclable material rather than non-recyclable material) and by recycling. It is difficult to control or limit the number of non-household items such as sofas, TV's, appliances, etc., that a household will purchase because they are essential items. They are also processed differently and usually do not wind up on a landfill. Another reason for recommending Option No.1, is that Cities who have adopted full volume base systems (Le., "charge for everything") are finding that the ravines, roadways, ditches and even streets are becoming popular sites for illegal dumping. The Committee is concerned that this situation could develop (once again) in Stillwater and the surrounding area if charges were levied for "extra" waste. The Committee would further recommend that the City use a sticker or tag (preferably a tag) system to identity and account for extra waste. The City can work with the contractor to develop procedures for using a sticker/tag system as well as other procedures associated with a volume base fee system. - 6 e }\1?l?V)1D~ - EXHIBIT "A" ~ PRESENT AVERAGE MONTHLY COST PER HOUSEHOLD Household Waste Regular Disposal 1.005 x 254,280 . 4,890 h.h. 12 mo. 4.35 4.35 . . Operating .66 x 254,280 . 4,890 h.h. 12 mo. 2.86 2.86 .. Extra Disposal 1. 005 x 112,400 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. 1.93 1.93 . T 3.19 Operating .66 x 112,400 .... 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. 1.26 1.26 . .. Clean-up Disposal 1.005 x 36,667 4,890 h.h. 12 mo. .63 .63 Operating .66 x 36,667 4,890 h.h. 12 mo. .41 .41 Grass/Leaves Disposal 1.005 x 66,667 . 4,890 h.h. t 12 mo. 1.14 1.14 T Operating .66 x 66,667 . 4,890 h.h. ~ 12 mo. .75 .75 .. Brush Disposal 1. 005 x 40,000 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. .69 .69 . .- Operating .66 x 40,000 . 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. .45 .45 . . t Metal Disposal 1.005 x 13,333 . 4,890 h.h. T 12 mo. .23 .23 . Operating .66 x 13,333 . 4,890 h.h. ... 12 mo. .15 .15 . . Miscellaneous Disposal 1. 005 x 55,467 . 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. .95 .95 .. .. Operating .66 x 55,467 . 4,890 h.h. . 12 mo. .62 .62 . - Total 9.92 6.50 16.42 - - Revenue Per Year 4,890 x 9.92 x 12 582,106 4,890 x 6.50 x 12 381,420 4,890 x 16.42 x 12 963,526 I A EXHIBIT IIBII ~ ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST OF PRESENT SOLID WASTE PROGRAM Disposal Operating Household Waste Regular Disposal (3,814 tons x $67 per ton) 255,538 Operating (3,814 tons x $44 per ton) 167,816 Extra Disposal (1,686 tons x $67 per ton) 112,962 Operating (1,686 tons x $44 per ton) 74,184 Clean Up Disposal (550 tons x $67 per ton) 36,850 Operating (550 tons x $44 per ton) 24,200 Grass/Leaves Disposal (1,000 tons x $67 per ton) 67,000 Operating (1,000 tons x $44 per ton) 44,000 Brush Disposal (600 tons x $67 per ton) 40,200 Operating (600 tons x $44 per ton) 26,400 t Metal Disposal (200 tons x $67 per ton) 13 ,400 Operating (200 tons x $44 per ton) 8,800 Miscellaneous Disposal (832 tons x $67 per ton) 55,744 Operating (832 tons x $44 per ton) 36,608 581,694 382,008 963,702 NOTE: (1) Disposal costs at RDF in Newport is about $67 ton (2) Operating costs = $382,008. Cost per ton is $44 ($382,008 - 8,682 tons) t B It -- - Disposal - $67 per ton : 30# x .0335 Operating - EXHIBIT IICII ESTIMATED AVERAGE COST PER 301 OF WASTE 2,000# = .0335 per # 1. 005 per 30# $44 per ton 7 2,000 = .22 per # 30# x .22 = .66 per 30 # C EXHIBIT 11011 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF 301 BAGS/CONTAINERS OF WASTE Household Waste - Regular 3,814 tons x 2,000# 30# 254,280 Extra 1,686 tons x 2,000# 30# = 112,400 Clean up 55 tons x 2,000# 30# = 36,667 Grass/Leaves 1,000 tons x 2,000# 30# 66,667 Brush 600 tons x 2,000# . 30# 40,000 Metal 200 tons x 2,000# 30# 13,333 Miscellaneous 832 tons x 2,000# 30# = 55,467 Total 8,682 tons x 2,000# 30# = 578,880 . t o e e e . . . . ESTIMATED WASTE TONNAGE Regular Household Waste Extra Household Waste Clean Up Grass/Leaves Brush Metal Miscellaneous Total Tonnage E 3,814 1,686 550 1,000 600 200 832 8,682 EXHIBIT IIEII - CITY/POP. BLAINE 38,500 (est) I.CHAMPLIN 16,245 CIRCLE PINES 4,706 (est) RESIDENTIAL REFUSE RATES FOR ORGANIZED COLLECTION Gl~l~~ COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS Anoka BFI $19.75/mo. UNLIMITED VOLUME, *large items accepted, NO **white goods accepted Refuse = $16.09 Recycling 0.86 Yard Waste 0.52 Admin 1.43 6% tax 0.85 The City of Blaine will most likely offset some of the cost with the increased funding received from Anoka County. Cost is subject to change later this year. Rates effective 07/15/89 Hennepin hauler consortium 6 haulers 90 GALLON CONTAINERS, large items accepted for extra charge, NO white goods accepted. $27.00/mo/non-recycler $22.00/mo/recycler Refuse ... $18.45 Recycling'" 1.30 Compost - 0.30 Admin = 0.72 6% tax = 1.23 Rates effective 01/01/90 Anoka Waste Management VOLUME BASED SYSTEM, additional material, large items, & goods require additional stickers purchased through City at $l/sticker. - $7.75 + $l/bag of refuse-as many bags/month as they wish -$11.68/mo "'$14.90/mo . =$19.04/mo white Hall Low Volume 32 gallons 64 gallons 96 gallons Refuse ... $5.00 / $7.90 1$10.95 /$14.85 Recycling - $1.75 / $1.75 / $1.75 / $1.75 Yard Waste- $0.70./ $0.70 / $0.70 / $0.70 Admin - $ N/C / $ N/C / $ N/C'/ $ N/C 6% tax = $0.30 / $0.47 / $0.66 / $0.89 The $0.70/mo cost covers 2 leaf collections, 1 citywide clean-up (at city's request), and 1 chipper/shredder collection. Large items require 10 stickers at $l/sticker, white goods require 18 stickers, 60 Ibs construction debris require 1 sticker, brush & prunings (5' x 4" diameter) require 1 sticker, additional bags of material require 1 sticker/bag, limited to 60 lb/bag. The recycling center was closed because of increased cost to the city and cost of labor. Rates effective 01/01/90 1 '1 tl~ntl JH\. Page 2 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 20,029 COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH 11i''-tJ, $J~/mo Refuse = $7. Recycling 1 Yard Waste= Admin COMMENTS UNLIMITED VOLUME, large items and white goods accepted Anoka Waste Management , Columbia Heights is currently in negotiating for~~ refuse rates. Rates effective 1~ ,ht/qO -1z131/'10 COTTAGE GROVE Washington Organized hauling is currently under consideration by the City. #EXCELSIOR 2,500 (est) Hennepin VOLUME BASED, SEMI-AUTOMATED SYSTEM Waste Management/Savage 60 gallons'" $19.23 (2-30 gallon cans) 90 gallons'" $18.39 (automated container) 90 gallons = $15.80 (automated senior rate) Refuse = $15.49 / $14.79 / $12.53 Recycling 1.25 / 1.25 / 1.25 Yard Waste= Admin 1.56 / 1.46 / 1.27 6% tax = 0.93 / 0.89 / 0.75 White goods and large items are NOT collected by the hauler. They can be collected by an independent hauler. Extra cans (30 gallons) of material will be collected, each can collected cost the residents $11.00/can. Brush is collected with a coupon. The coupon costs $2.7 for a small bag of brush. Waste Management/Savage collects other yard waste one Saturday, and charges the city on a volume basis. Excelsior is currently in negotiations with Waste Management/Savage for 1990 rates. FALCON HEIGHTS Ramsey Organized hauling is currently under consideration by the City. It is anticipated that the City will begin organized hauling in 1991. P1II3 01/12/90 Refuse Rates ... ~ CITY/POP. COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS "'FARMINGTON 5,370 (est) Dakota City Crews 90 gallon automated system 1-90 gallon'" $14.17 ($42.50/quarter) Refuse $11.57 ($34.72/quarter) Recycling = 1.00 ($3.00/quarter) Yard Waste- N/C (see additional information) Admin ... 1.59 ($4.78/quarter) 6% tax 0.75 ($2.09/quarter) Residents may purchase from City Hall a $l/bag sticker for collection of yard waste. Residents are encouraged to take their yard waste to a drop off site right outside of city limits. Large items and appliances are collected by the City, once a week (Tuesdays). The cost for the service is $15 per item, and $15/cubic yard + $l/minute (with a minimum of 15 minutes) for additional materials. Residents may request 2-90 gallon containers (or even 3) at double (or triple) the cost of one. FRIpLEY . Anoka The City of Fridley has begun preliminary investigation into organized collection. "'HASTINGS Dakota 14,500 (est) Waste Management LIMITED VOLUME, VOLUME BASED SYSTEM - large items accepted for an additional charge, NO white goods accepted 30 gallon = $11.80/mo. 60 gallon = $16.57/mo. unlimited = $21.34/mo. Refuse ... $10.00 / $14.50 / $19.00 Recycling'" $ 1.20 / $ 1.20 / $ 1.20 Admin. ... $ N/C / $ N/C / $ N/C 6% tax = $ 0.60 / $ 0.87 / $ 1.14 Yard waste is collected at a cost of $1.70/bag. Stickers are purchased through City Hall. Dakota County covers the cost of the administrative charges for the. City. Dakota County pays recycling haulers $20/ton for the recycled materials they collected, as well as furnishing the haulers with a processing center to dispose of the materials collected. There is no charge for the processing center to the haulers. It is not m8nditory that haulers use the processing center, or that all materials must go to the center. Rates effective 01/01/90 Page 4 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. IHOPKINS 15,336 COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS Hennepin City Crews LIMITED VOLUME SYSTEM 1-90 gallon 2-90 gallon $19.04/mo $37.32/mo Refuse $ 17.25 / $34.50 Recycling 0.755 / 0.75 Yard Waste... Admin N!C ! NjC 6% tax 1.04 / 2.07 Hopkins has a compost site within the city. Residents may contact the city and arrange for yard waste collection, and are billed accordingly. Hopkins does not charge any administrative charge, but they do receive funds from Hennepin County (see # note). Rates effective 01/01/90 LITTLE CANADA Ramsey 8,800 (est) hauler consortium of 4 haulers VOLUME BASED SYSTEM - Little Canada's system is similar to North St. Paul 30 gallon'" $ 9.68 60 gallon = $11.20 90 gallon = $12.25 150 gallon = $15.51 Refuse ... $ 9.13 / $10.56 / $11.56 / $14.63 Recycling $ N/C / N/C / N/C / N/C Yard Waste NOT COLLECTED BY HAULERS Admin ... $ N/C / N/C / N/C / N/C - The haulers directly bill the residents 6% tax = 0.55 / 0.64 / 0.69 / 0.88 Little Canada has received a grant from Ramsey County to cover the cost of their recycling program. The current cost of that program is $1. 95/household/month. Large items and white goods will be collected by the haulers on the same basis that they're collected in North St. Paul. Residents are encouraged to take their yard waste to a Ramsey County Compost site. No yard waste is collected Rates effective 09/01/89 .. ~ ~ .. Page 5 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. .. ~ COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS NO. ST. PAUL Ramsey 11,921 (est) hauler consortium or 5 haulers 30 gallon 90 gallon = 150 gallon VOLUME BASED SYSTEM - large items and white goods collected for additional charge. $ 7.95 $11.40 $15.64 RAMSEY #ROBBINSDALE 14,422 Refuse $7.50 / $10/75 / $14.75 Recycling N/C / NjC / N/C Yard Waste- Admin = N/C j N/C / N/C - The hauler directly bills the residents 6% tax ... 0.45 j 0.65 / 0.89 Residents are allowed to switch volume system one time during a year at no charge, any additional changes cost the resident $15/change. Additional bags of refuse over and above the amount billed for are changed at the rate of $1.75/bag for 30 gallon bags. The City of North St. Paul has received a grant from Ramsey County to cover the cost of their recycling program. Yard Waste is either taken to a county compost site directly by the residents, or residents may purchase a degradable bag. The cost of the degradable bage in 1989 was $0.50/bag. The cost of the bag is expected to increase in 1990. Large items and white goods are collected for an additional charge of anywhere from $15.00-$20.00jitem. Residents must make arrangements for collection of large items and white goods in advance of collection. Rates effective 09/01/89 Anoka The City of Ramsey has begun preliminary investigation into organized hauling for their city. Hennepin Waste Management $12.00/mo/recyclers $16.00jmojnon-recyclers LIMITED VOLUME - Non-recyclers pay more Refuse = $8.56 Recycling = 2.07 Yard Waste= 2.86 Admin ... N/C 6% tax - 0.52 Actual cost to resident is $14.01, for two 30 gallon cans. Robbinsdale offsets remainder of collection cost through use of anticipated Hennepin County funding. White goods require 10 additional stickers, large items require 5-10 additional stickers, and additional bags of material require one sticker each. Stickers cost $l/sticker. Residents are mailed "permits. for two cans. Residents who typically use just one can, can mail in one of the .permits. for a one time yearly, $24.00 reduction off their bill. Resident have until January 31, 1990, to sign up for the one can rate. About 13% of Robbinsdale residents have chosen the cone can option. Rates effective 01/01/90 Page 6 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. ROSEVILLE 1ST. LOUIS PARK 43,000 (est) SHAKO PEE 11,733 .. COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS Ramsey The Roseville City Council is currently considering the question of organizaed hauling. Hennepin BFI $2l.09/mo. UNLIMITED VOLUME, large items & white goods accepted. Refuse $15.68 Recycling 2.02 Yard Waste= 1.76 Admin 0.80 6% tax = 0.83 Resident who recycle at least once a month (three times quarterly) would receive a $6.60/quarter credit on their bill. Residents who do not separate their yard waste from their other refuse are charged an addition $3.00/collection for yard waste. St. Louis Park uses part of their funding frcm Hennepin County for the recycling discount. The City purchased a bar code system in order to properly credit residents for recycling. Rates effective 01/01/90 Scott Waste Management/Savage 1-65 2-65 1-65 VOLUME BASED, AUTOMATED SYSTEM gallon = $10.96 gallon $16.96 gallon'" $ 9.12 (senior rate) Refuse = $8.57 / $14.26 / $6.92 Recycling 1.63 / 1.63 / 1.63 - City receives revenue from material Yard Waste= Admin = 0.15 / 0.15 / 0.15 6% tax 0.61 / 0.92 / 0.42 Residents have the option of receiving refuse service from haulers other than Waste Management/Savage. Yard waste is handled with an extra service coupon which is purchased through City Hall for $1.70/coupon. Each coupon will cover three bags of yard waste. Large items and appliances also require the extra service coupon. 13 coupons are required for large items such as refrigerators, freezers, couches, etc.; 8 coupons for mattresses, box springs, stuffed chairs, etc.; 5 coupons for small furniture and appliances; 2 coupons for Christmas trees; 1 coupon for additional bags of garbage & bundles of branches (each coupon is good for up to 3-30 gallon garbage bags of yard waste and bundles of branches five foot in length weighing no more than 60 pounds). Recyclers will receive a discount on their refuse bill beginning 1990, the amount will be based on recycling revenues generated in 1989. Rates effective 1/1/90 -- Rates are scheduled to increase 05/15/90 .. ~ pa'? 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. STILLWATER 12,290 ITONKA BAY 1,500 (est) e e COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH $14.65/mo. COMMENTS UNLIMITED VOLUME, large items and white goods collected Washington Junker Sanitation $14.65/mo. no collection at this time, in negotiations included in $14.65/mo. - no brush or prunings bigger and 3' in length accepted than 4" in diameter Refuse Recycling Yard Waste Admin = included in $14.65 6% tax Hauler, by contract, has three "Clean Up Periods" per year for residents, two weekends in the spring, one weekend in the summer, and two weekends in the fall. There is no further information on this program at this time. Junker Sanitation is awaiting a hearing for violation of "flow control" ordinances in Washington County. At this time Stillwater is waiting for the outcome of the hearing to determine taxable and non-taxable items on their bill. Rates effective 04/01/89 - no increase until 4/90, by contract Hennepin BFI UNLIMITED VOLUME $18.00/mo/recyclers $25.00/mo/non-recyclers $14.00/mo/senior recyclers $18.00/mo/senior non-recyclers Refuse = $17.70 Recycling = 2.45 yard waste'"' 0.85 Admin = 1.00 6% tax 1.00 The discount to recyclers comes from the additional charges to non-recyclers. The administrative charges are 80% covered by funds from Hennepin County (see # note). Rate effective 01/01/90 Page 8 01/12/90 Refuse Rates CITY/POP. WHITE BEAR LAKE 22,538 e COUNTY/HAULER COST/MONTH COMMENTS Ramsey/Washington Knutson Sanitation LIMITED VOLUME, TIERED SYSTEM: 90 gallons 60 gallons = 30 gallons = $14.12/mo. 11. 6.7 /mo. 10.33/mo. >-vt-- 15d "I 1"2.77 / /, 7--.S S I q I Refuse = $11.57 / $9.25 Recycling = 1.09 / 1.09 Compost = 0.27 / 0.27 Admin 0.50 / 0.50 6% tax 0.69 / 0.56 Large items and white goods can 90 gallons is $1.l5/bag - these price with the price increase. Rates effective 09/01/89 - no increase until / $7.99 /mo. / 1.09 /mo. / 0.27 /mo. - same as yard waste / 0.50 /mo. / 0.48 /mo. be pri~ately hauled for additional cost, and ~RtpriR] over prices are effective 9/1/89, the 30 gallon price is a new 8/90, by contract e e ~.. :J< .- Page 01/12/90 Refuse Rates . . DEFINITIONS: *LARGE ITEMS: Items such as sofas, TVs, chairs, tables, etc. - household items **WHITE GOODS: Appliances such as refrigerators, stoves, washers, dryers, air conditioners, etc. Appliances have been defined in the S.C.O.R.E. bill. LIMITED VOLUME/VOLUME BASED SYSTEM: The price for collection service is dependent on size and number of cans collected. Additional materials cost the resident more. YARD WASTE: {;rass, laa-vas, and garden waste. The state and county have no agreed upon definition for this term. At this time, each county is defining .yard waste". # Cities in Hennepin County (Champlin, Excelsior, Hopkins, Robbinsdale, St. Louis Park, and Tonka Bay) receive between 60-80% of the program cost from Hennepin County, plus $5jhousehold for container cost. The funds received are used as reba~~es to residents for recycling programs, and/or to help offset collection costs. '" Cities in Dakota County receive 100% funding for their recycling programs from the county, this includes salaries, containers, publicity, and collection costs. Haulers in Dakota County also receive $20/ton from Dakota County for recycled materials collected in Dakota County. The County also provides a recycling processing center, however it is not manditory that recyclables be brought t the processing center. There is no flow designation in Scott and Dakota County. You will note that rates for collection and service are much lower in those two counties than in the other counties. It is expected that Dakota County will begin flow designation in 1990. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgia J. Reay Recycling Coordinator City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue Northeast Columbia Heights, MN 55421 788-9221, ext.~ g/3 e e. e STAFF REQUEST IT~~ DEPARTMENT FIRE ME::TING DATE --------------- November 20, 1990 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is) Permission to buy ten chairs for our day room and offices. The chairs --------------------------------------------------------------------- we have now were second hand when we got them and are now in very bad --------------------------------------------------------------------- condition. If we get them I suggest throwing away old chairs but save the --------------------------------------------------------------------- castors. --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline ass(:lciated with this N1!ql.test and needed to fund the request) We have no money in our budget but Diane Deblon said we should be able to the c':tsts, the prop.:tsed if any, s':)I.trce .:)f thai:: are the rl.Lnds get them out of capital outlay as the cost is only $999.40. -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED x YES NO ALL COUNCIL REQUEST IT~~S ~~~I BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDUL~D CQUNCI.L MEE:TING IN;lER.}j BE P;:7D ,IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. SUBMITTED BY -tl'-d.~~ _ OATS ~~~~.:.-~~ e It It Memo to: Mayor and Council From: City Coordinator Re: MTC Change in Bus Route Da: November 15, 1930 Presently the MTC bus travels down 3rd to Chestnut to Water (stopping at Hooleys) then up Myrtle to Main to Chestnut (stopping at St. Croix Drug) and up 3rd again. MTC is nc~ requesting City approval for a route change that would have the bus continue up Myrtle to 3rd Street (and not Main to Chestnut to 3rd). I am not aware of any reasons the City would be opposed to this change. It actually appears to be a safer route and the bus would no longer have to stop at St. Croix Drug at Chestnut (which is a wide turn in a congested area). The clrlly "strir,g" attached tCI the l'~equest is that "'HC needs to have a bus stop on Myrtle St. (west bound) between Main and Second St. It would appear that the stop could be located by the Old Post Office bldg. The Public Works Director and the Public Safety Director have reviewed the t~equest arid have 1"10 objections. I have also talked to the Old Post Office shops and they do not have any objections. Therefore, I would recClfilfllend appt"c.val. 'i7 vJ;{ ; ~ilJwte~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~ e ~aqo~ & C~q Co~ncil: Nov. /6, /990 Plea4e accep~ ~hi4 a4 m~ official no~ice o{ ~e~ement {~OM ~q 4e~lJice, eUect.ive ?an. /6, /990. ~an. /) wUl be mq la4~ 1IJ0~k daq. 9 have enioqed wo~kin1 {o~ ~he Ci~q ~he4e pa~ 27 qea44, b~ am now looki~ to~wa~d ~o a chal'Ufe in li{e~qle fo~ ~he ~em.ainde~ ot mq qea44..' 9 lIJou.-Ld wUfe qo~ ~o con-.Ude~ Yltq ~epLacement ~ediat.elq 40 ~he new pe~4on cou.-Ld be on bOa4d ~ lea4t ~~VlIJeek4 be{o~e 9 leave, fo~ a b~eak-in pe4iod. [nel04ed ~ e ~he of{icial iob de4C4ip~ion which maq aid qo~ in qoU4 detibe~a~ion4. 5irr.ce~etq , fr<~.Q2> 63~$c~ ~oel R.. StekUJlt 5u.p~. pa~k4.. e CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 .' l)o b D ed-c/t--i..pt.-i..o n -- $upe/t--i..ntendant 0 f pM.kd- e pOd-U-i..on t.Ule $upe/t--i..ntendant D ep M.t.m ent Pallu.. Rcaunt.able t.o pa/t-k boa/t-d, cU~ coo/t-d-i..nat.o/t- - cU~ counc-i..l POd-U-i..Ond. d-upe/t-u-i..d.ed 6 fu.LL- t..u;~e, d-eue/t-al pa/t-t.- t.Ute d-ead-O na.l P /t-Uta/t-Lf 0 b i-ect-i..ued- t.o p/t-ou-i..de fo/t- t.he ca-i..'fend. of t.he cU~ at $:tUlwa:te/t- a pa/t-k & /t-eC/t-eat-i..ona.l d-~d.t.em t.hat. meet.d- t.he-i../t- needd-. t1ai-o/t- a/t-ead- Of /t-ed-pond.-i..b.i.lUL{ It Ro ad1/l.-i..~at.-i..ue. '0 coo/t-d-i..nat.e pa/t-k boa/t-d pol-i..c~ deuelopment 20 coo/t-d-i..nate pub-L-i..c /t-e.Lat.-i..ond. fo/t- t.he depa-t:tm.ent Jocomp-i..-Le, p/t-epM.e and /t-ecommend capUal .u~p/t-ouef/l.ent p/t-o~/t-a1/l. p/t-ou-i..de i-i..nanc-i..a.t /t-eco/t-d-i..~ and ~epo~t.-i..~ adho/t--i..'fe e><.pendUwted- p/t-epa/t-e depM.-t.m.ent bu.d~e.t. 1/l.on-i..t.o/t- & cont.lr,ol depM.-tr~ent bud~e.t., e><.pend.ed- ma-i..nta-i..n -i..nvento/t--i..ed- ot needed d-uppl-i..ed- 9.pe./t-fo/t-1/l. /t-.{,d-k f/l.ana~emnet. adf/l.-i..~/t-at.-i..on 10.pe/t-to/t-m -i..~ance /t-eco/t-dd- ma-i..ntenace "0 pe/t-{o/t-f/l. pM.-k ded-~n 12. p/t-ou-i..de and obt.a-i..n p-Lann-i..~ adv-i..ce I J. f/l.aA-nta-i..n c,;ntact. wUh uendo/t-d-, d-uppl-i..e./t-d- 140 ne~ot.-i..at.e pwtchad-ed-, cont/t-actd- I So wo/t-k wah and t.!vr.outfh calf co U/1.c.i.l , adm.w.u.d.t.a/t-t.o/t-, pM.-k boa/t-d and ot.he./t- de p1U:.me ntd-. 160 /t-ed-pond t.o /t-od-i..ne -i../1.<fu.u-i..ed-, complaJ...ntd-, -i..nte/t-naJ.. and e><.t.e./t-nal.. if 70, y,ta-i.nta-i..n /t-eco/t-dd- ot y,ta.i...ntenance & development 0 teach pM.-k. a/t-ea: a) elfu-i..pm.e.n.t., t./t-eed-, d-Mubd-, flowe/t-d-, t.wtt, mow-i..~ t.';"tted-, wat.e./t-,LYUJ t..uned-, et.c. 18. p/t-epa/t-e d-pec-i..t-i..cat.-i..Ond., /t-e~ued.t. and eualua:te b-i..dd-/p/t-opod-a-L4, /t-ecof/l.mend accep:ta.nce/ /t-ej-ect-i..on at b-i..dd-/ p/t-opod-ald-o I 90 at.t.e.md mee.t.-i..I'Ufd-, c-La.<l.d.ed-, d-e.m-i..na-t.d- 200 compod-e and del-i..ue/t- p/t-ed-e~tat.-i..ond., co/t-/t-ed-pondence,/t-epo/t..td-, memOd-o 40 e 5'0 6, 70 8. It e . .. 8. 4u-pe;r.vuo;r.Lf I. de.LelfO-.te wo;r.k. and 4chedu-.Le e/:tpLIf ee4: a) a<14-U;-VL .ta4k4/ p;r.o{-ecU.. o;r. M:.ea4 o{ ;r.e4poVLMbU,u1f .to er.tp.Lolfee4 and o;r.~aVLiJe wo;r.kLoad4, avaUabU,uIf, .to coiVLcide w,uh activ,uie4 4cheduled at. VaA.iOU-4 .Locat.ioJ'l..d.. 2.moVLito;r. and app;r.ove .tlj4eca;r.d4, at..tendaVLce,ove;r.t.ime, ho.L~aIf4, 4ick .Leave, ~cat.iovt.4, .Leave ot ab4eVLce4. 1. eva.Lu-at.e and iVLve4t-u;-a.te compLaiVLt.4 a~ai~ emp.Lolfee4, p;r.ovide iVLfoJt.r.taL {eed- back .to u4p.LoLfee4 abou-t. t.he~ {-ob pe;r.{o;r.mance. 4. docu.meVLt. emp.Lolfee pe~to;r.~VLce o;r.p;r.epa;r.e fo;r.ma.L w;r.~eVL pe;r.foJt.r.tance app;r.ai4a.L. ). wo;r.k with empLolfee4 .to p.LaVL fab pe;r.fo;r.maVLce imp;r.ov~teVLt./modificat.ion. 6 . i~.te elllpLo If ee ducipLiVLa.41f ac.t.i..o VL4. 7. de.te;r.miVLe & ;r.ecommend p;r.omo.tiovt.4, di4CipLinM:.1f act~J'I..d., awaJt.d4 fo~ u4p.LoLfee4. 8.;r.e40.Lve emp.Lolfee con{Lict4 within wo;r.k ~OU-p4. q co ndu-ct uainA:.YUf act.ivitie4 fo;r. depa.;r..tmeVLt.. [du-cat.ion & t.-t.ainA:.YUf ;r.e~u-~ement4 fl. l-i.be;r.a.L' ~ edu.c.at:.-i.o.n with 4pecia.-L t.-t.a.iru;. and hand4- 0 VL e>epe;r.ieVLce iVL .the {oUo wiYUf: I. .Lea.de;r.4hip .t~a-i.nA:.YUf 2. effective cOH~u-icat.-i.on 3. aJt.bo;r.ic"d;tWr-e 4. 40U4, fe;r..tUiJe;r.4/ Mteru:i.Jlt.eVLt.4, 0;r.~a.M..c & iYLO;r.~anA:.c ). p;r.ope;r. .tWr-{ cu..UWr-a.L pltactice4 - {e;r..t.-UiJ-i..ru;., wiUeltiru;., f'A.owiYU}-, avr-iUilUf, weed and pe4t contlto.L and .the pltOpe;r. e~u-i.pment U-4e 6. ~i~iUion and lteflt-u;-vr-iUioVL -i..r1.4taUat.ion and 1/t.a.M1.te~i. . 7. cOVLd.-tk.~ion and maitena.nce of VaJt.-i.oU-4 pLa.Lf aJt.ea4 - baL.L {i.eLd4, .tenn..v.s. COWr--t4, hockelf ;r.-i..nlu.., 40CCvr- f-i..e.Ld4, picnic aJt.ea4, beache4, de. 8. CaA.e of olt/1.a.ilt.eVLta..L p.Lant4 - fLowe;r.4(aVLnu.a.l. & pe;r.;r.enA:.aL), 4Mu-b4, ~Ou.nd cove;r.4. q. 4e.Lec.tion and calte of ma-i.ntena.nce e~u.ipment. Qu.a.-Lij-i.ciU-iovt.4 9ntetjA-itlf - ded-iciU-ion - pltUe -in achievemeVLt. - u-nde;r.4tand-iYU}- o{ poLU-i.C4 [>(.(],I/t.p.Le4 0 f pe;r..[o;r.mance M-i..te.-Ua flU u-nde;r. f~4t fl. & e. above frtd6<.~ ~ e Fourth Draft: November 20, 1990 Execution Draft DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ~D CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II, A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RELATING TO STILLWATER II OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CURVE CREST BOULEVARD AND WASHINGTON AVENUE e This contract was drafted by: DAVID T. MAGNUSON Magnuson & Moberg Attorney at Law 324 South Main Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 e I. II. III. IV. TABLE OF CONTENTS Statement of Public Purpose and Authority . 1 . . . . . 1 Def ini tions . . . . Statement of Objectives . . 2 Tax Increment Payments . . 2 V. Developer's ction to Accomplish Objectives. . 3 VI. Conditions P ecedent to City Responsibility . . 4 VII. General Provisions VIII. Events of De IX. X. Expiration D Effective Da e Exhibit "A" . 5 . 5 . 6 . . 6 Description . . 8 Exhibit "B" ssessment Agreement and Assessor's Certificate . . . . . . . 9 Exhibit "c" ertificate of Completion. . . . .14 ,. e e e e CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, AND CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II, A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT THIS CONTRACT, effective this 13th day of November, 1990, between the City of Stillwater (the "City"), a Home Rule Charter City of the Third Class of the State of Minnesota, having its principal offices at City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 and Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General Partnership, (the "Developer"), 1809 Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082. I. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY e 1.1. PUBLIC PURPOSE. The public purpose of this Contract is to restore and improve the tax base and the tax revenue generation capacity of the City, increase employment opportunities and employment in the City, realize comprehensive planning goals contained in the Comprehensive Plan and to create an attractive and efficient area for commercial development and other related uses. 1.2. AUTHORITY. The City has authority pursuant to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, Sections 469.174 through 469.175, inclusive, as amended, to finance certain eligible private costs, and administrative costs with tax increment revenues derived from a Tax Increment Financing District established within a Tax Increment Development District. II. DEFINITIONS e 2.1. DEFINITIONS. In this Contract the following definitions will be used: "Available Tax Increments" means fifty (50%) percent of the total increment generated from the project actually received by the City in any year. "Certificate of Completion" means the certification, in the form of the certificate contained in Exhibit "c" attached and made a part of this Contract. "Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents - 1 - of the cons the Develop "Estim Market Valu real proper Assessor of accordance "Devel estate desc 3.1 . of the City developing vital comme base and is It has been and the Cou development increment a extraordina site. 3.2. Developer p property th industrial retail. 4.1 . Development Development Downtown an Redevelopme November 3, Financing P development Tax Increme Funding Dis the extent Developer's order that be included Plan and be Assistance 4.2. agrees to p installment August, 199 1994, and i dates until ruction work to be performed by r on the Development Property. ted Market Value" or "Estimated tion" means the market value of y as determined by the County the County of Washington in ith Minnesota statutes. pment Property" means that real ibed in the attached Exhibit "A". e STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES ITY'S OBJECTIVES. The objectives are to assist the Developer in he Development Property into a cial area that produces jobs, tax an enhancement to the community. demonstrated to the City Council cil hereby finds that this would not take place but for tax sistance because of the y expenses associated with the EVELOPER'S OBJECTIVES. The ans to construct a building on t will be used as an office/ arehouse facility with limited the e TAX INCREMENT PAYMENTS AX INCREMENT DISTRICT. The Property is within Tax Increment District No.1, known as the Industrial Park Scattered Site t District, and the City, on 1987, modified the Tax Increment an for the District to include the area. On November 13, 1990, the t Financing Plan for Tax Increment rict #1 was supplemented only to f including reference to the specific plans for the project in he Developer's construction plans with the Tax Increment Financing eligible for the Tax Increment rovided by this Contract. AX INCREMENT PAYMENTS. The City y to the Developer in semiannual , payable on the first day of , and the first day of February subsequent years on the same the first day of August, 2003, e - 2 - e (the "Scheduled Payment Dates"), one-half of the available tax increment, (the "Scheduled Payments") or until a total of $202,565.00 is paid, whichever occurs first. The City shall have no obligation to make any Scheduled Payment unless the Developer has received or is entitled to receive by December 1, 1991, a Certificate of Completion for this project. The Scheduled Payment due on any Scheduled Payment Date is payable solely from and only to the extent that the City has received as of the Scheduled Payment Date available tax increments received in the six months prior to a Scheduled Payment Date. In the event that the Developer voluntarily sells, assigns or transfers more than a 75% ownership of the property before the year 1999, the tax increments to be paid to the Developer shall be limited to the amount paid to that date, or $126,000, whichever is less. This provision shall not apply to an involuntary transfer of the property or to a mortgagee in possession of the property or to the subsequent transferee of a mortgage in possession. Each payment shall be made by check or draft payable to the Developer and mailed to the Developer at 1809 Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082. The Developer, by notice to the City, may designate different addresses to which the payments shall be sent. This obligation shall not be payable from or constitute a change upon the funds of the City, and the Developer shall never have, or be deemed to have, the right to compel any exercise of any taxing power of the City or any other public body, and neither the City nor any council member, office employee or agent of the City shall be liable personally thereon. In addition to the "pay as you go" assistance described in this Section, the City will pay to the Developer an additional Tax Increment payment in the amount of $10,221.00 to be paid upon the execution of this Contract and upon the satisfaction of conditions a. and c. of section 6.1 of this Contract. e V. DEVELOPER'S ACTION TO ACCOMPLISH OBJECTIVES e 5.1. THE PROJECT. The Developer shall construct or shall cause to be constructed on the site a building containing approximately 18,840 square feet of rentable space and a - 3 - parking cars in feet of parking sta costs inclu constructio The Develop substantial plans that City and th been approv 5.2. provided to to the City paid to the reimburseme Developer t qualifying reimburseme Minnesota T 5.3. Developer p building is for sale or providing for approximately 52 e I and an additional 7,550 square able space plus an additional 36 ls as Phase II. The total project ing the land, landscaping and will be approximately $1,420,000. r will construct this without any deviation from the construction re approved and on file with the site and parking plan that has d by the City. e LIGIBLE COSTS. The Developer has the City assurances satisfactory that the tax increment funds being Developer are for the t of costs incurred by the at are legally permissible and osts that are eligible for t by the City pursuant to the x Increment Financing Act. OT FOR SPECULATION. The omises to the City that this built for rent or lease and not speculation. e VI. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CITY RESPONSIBILITY 6.1. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT. Responsibility to provide the tax increment financing ssistance to the project as set forth in S ction 4.2 of this Contract is conditione upon the happening of the following vents: a. A proval of the Developer's constructi n plans by the Stillwater building official a d approval of the Developer's developmen plans for the Development Property by the Cit of Stillwater Community Developmen Director and, if required, pursuant t Stillwater Ordinances, the approval 0 the development plans by the Stillwater City Council. b. T e granting by the City of a Certificat of Completion of the Developer's improvemen s without any substantial deviation from the c nstruction plans approved and on file with he City. e - 4 - e c. Execution by the Developer of Assessment Agreement substantially in the form of the Assessment Agreement contained in Exhibit "D". d. Pay to the City $10,221.00 as a Park Dedication Fee. VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1. SUBORDINATION. In order to facilitate the obtaining of financing for the construction of the improvements by the Developer, the City agrees to subordinate its rights under this Contract to a holder of a mortgage on the property. e 7.2. NOTICE. Notices shall be given by U.s. mail or personally delivered; and in the case of the Developer, to be addressed to or delivered personally at their address, 1809 Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082; and in the case of the City, addressed to or delivered personally to the City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082. The City and the Developer may, by notice given to the other, designate different addresses to which subsequent notices will be sent. VIII. EVENTS OF DEFAULT e 8.1. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. The following shall be events of default under this Contract: a. Failure by the Developer to pay when due any real estate taxes and special assessments duly levied by the appropriate taxing jurisdictions, in an amount based upon a market value of at least the amounts set forth in Exhibit "B" of this Contract. b. Failure by the Developer to provide and maintain adequate fire and property damage insurance or failure by the Developer to reconstruct the improvements in the event of their destruction. c. Failure by the Developer to secure plan approval or zoning and subdivision approval from the City of Stillwater. d. Failure by the Developer to commence and complete construction of the improvements pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Contract. e. The failure to meet any condition precedent set forth in Article VI of this Contract. - 5 - 8.2. of default more of the a. Su Contract un Developer t continue it b. Wi Completion. c. Wi increment p this Contra d. Te rendering v approvals c including p of Tax Incr of this Con e. Ta legal, equi necessary t right of th costs assoc certifying in which th for collect 9.1 . shall expir defined in all conditi responsibil Contract ha within one this Contra the Develop set forth i whichever 0 EMEDIES ON DEFAULT. When an event ccurs, the City may take one or following actions: pend its performance under this il it receives assurances from the at it will cure its default and performance under the Contract. hhold the Certificate of e hhold any installment of the tax yments due under Section 4.2 of t. minate the Contract, thereby id any covenants, promises or ntained in this Contract, yment of any future installments ments promised under Section 4.2 ract. e whatever action, including able or administrative action, protect the City, including the City to collect any unpaid public ated with the project by he total of such costs in the year yare due to the County Auditor on with the real estate taxes. e IX. EXPIRATION DATE XPIRATION DATE. This Contract upon an event of default as ection VIII of this Contract or if ns precedent to the City's ty pursuant to Section VI of this e not been substantially completed ear from the effective date of t, or upon the final payment to r of the tax increment payments Section 4.2 of this Contract, curs first. X. EFFECTIVE DATE 10.1. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Contract shall be ef ective November 13, 1990. e - 6 - e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Contract to be executed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and sealed with its corporate seal; and the Developer has executed this Contract the day and year first above written. CITY OF STILLWATER By Wally Abrahamson, Mayor and By Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk DEVELOPER By C. R. Hackworthy, Managing General Partner, Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General Partnership STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON e On this day of , 1990, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, appeared Wally Abrahamson and Mary Lou Johnson, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are, respectively, the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Stillwater, and that this instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of the City by authority of its City Council, and they acknowledge that said instrument was the free act and deed of the City. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON e On this day of , 1990, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, appeared C. R. Hackworthy, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Managing General Partner of the Developer named in the foregoing instrument and that this instrument was signed as the free act and deed of the Developer. Notary Public - 7 - EXHIBIT "A" e l'hOftc 464.)1 0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY IlULT & ASSOCIATES. INe. ',^leF. HEbClSEII lnnd Surveyors trottM. ~t.. Ifo. 1J'9O U" bh Ikttlku,d H).EST LAKE. MINH. ,}OJ, TERRANCEU. JotlHSON MImlI. RI'I. No.UIIS I h(',(by c uHy Ih;!1 Ihi$ :\urvty. Ill:m. or rcporl W;t~ prct,:uttl by 1t1( or undt'r m)' dir~ Stll>>('f'- Yi~l> aud Ihal I fnll a duly Rccjsl~rCl.l land Surveyor under the laws of the Slale of MIII8CSOII. M-. .'~ ale October 11. 1990 Scale: I Inch .~e" . DEHOTES InON PIPE FOUND o DENOTES IRON PIPE SET H..'-2I'29'W. 320.71 .; :>i iii ~ oJ oJ lU II: o Z II) <( o III l- I- <( oJ ~ I- o I- " .. o g ; ~ . ;" C .- .., .. o '" z ::; ,.; ~ o ~ ~.. :~ 'b z 102211 sa. FT. ... " S . 0: . .. ~ t; 5 . J ui ~ :z o I- el :z i: II) ~ e ~ 0<< ,,". .. \:~ .; S. 1HE ou rLOT It. "."-%l'now. 210." ,; CU VE CREST BLVD. (PLATTED AS 63RD. ST. N.) . , 'NOT BUILT' T OF OUTLOT A, STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK, WASIIINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA. SURVEY F 11: 'CON/SPEC CORPORATION, Stillwater, MN S5092 'G JroQosed as reQuesled bv cllerlU Thai part r lhe Soulh 344.66 feet of Outlot A. STlllWATEIlINOUSTRlAl PAHK. Washlnylo Counly,I'linnesola. lying east of the West 366.97 feet thereof. SUlJJecllo and togelher wllh any valid easements, reslrlctlons and rp.serv.JlIo 5. e 8 e EXHIBIT "B" ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AND ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATE Between THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, and CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II, A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP and COUNTY ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON e Drafted by DAVID T. MAGNUSON Magnuson & Moberg Attorneys at Law 324 South Main Street Stillwater, MN 55082 e - 9 - j-' SSESSMENT AGREEMENT e THIS AGREE ENT, made on or as of the 13th day of November, 1990, between The City of Stillwater, Minnesota, a mu icipal corporation (the "City"), Curve Crest Pro erties II, a Minnesota General Partnership (th "Developer"), and the County Assessor of the County of Washington (the "Assessor"). WITNESSETH, that WHEREAS, 0 or before the date hereof, the City and Develo er have entered into a Contract for Private Develop ent (the "Development Contract") regarding certa"n real property located in the City of Stillwater, ereinafter referred to as the "Development Pr perty" and legally described in Schedule "A" he eto; and WHEREAS, i said Developmen construct a 18, building upon t "Minimum Improv is contemplated that pursuant to Contract the Developer will 40 square foot office/ warehouse e Development Property (the ments"); and e WHEREAS, t e City and Developer desire to establish a min"mum market value for Development Property and th Minimum Improvements to be constructed the eon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Secti n 469.177, Subdivision 8; and WHEREAS, t reviewed the pr for the Minimum contemplated wi NOW, THERE in consideratio agreements made agree as follow 1. Upon s construction of Improvements by delivery to the Certificate of Development Con which shall be Property descri Improvements co e City and the Assessor have liminary plans and specifications Improvements which it is 1 be erected; ORE, the parties to this Agreement, of the promises, covenants and by each to the other, do hereby bstantial completion of the above-referenced Minimum the Developer, as evidenced by the Developer from the City of the ompletion (as defined in the ract), the minimum market value ssessed for the Development ed in Schedule A, with the Minimum structed e - 10 - e thereon, for ad valorem tax purposes shall be The parties to this Agreement expect that the construction of the above-referenced Minimum Improvements will be completed on or before July 1, 1991, but that substantial completion for purposes of assessment will be completed by May 1, 1991. 2. The minimum market value herein established shall be of no further force and effect and this Agreement shall terminate on the date when the Development Contract either expires or terminates. 3. This Agreement, with the Development Contract, shall be promptly recorded by the Developer with a copy of Minnesota statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8, set forth in Schedule B hereto. The Developer shall pay all costs of recording. e 4. Neither the preambles nor provisions of this Agreement are intended to, nor shall they be construed as, modifying the terms of the Development Contract between the City and the Developer. 5. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 6. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. THE CITY OF STILLWATER, By Wally Abrahamson, Mayor and By Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk DEVELOPER By e C. R. Hackworthy, Managing General Partner, Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General Partnership - 11 - STATE OF MINNES TA COUNTY OF WASHI GTON SSe e On this before me, a No County, persona Mary Lou Johnso being by me dul Mayor and City that this instr City by authori City Clerk ackn free act and de STATE OF MINNES TA day of , 1990, ary Public within and for said ly appeared Wally Abrahamson and , to me personally known, who, sworn, did say that they are the lerk of the City of Stillwater, ment was signed on behalf of the y of its Council; and the Mayor and wledged the instrument to be the d of the City. otary Public ss. COUNTY OF WASHI GTON On this before me, a No County, persona personally know say that he is Developer, that behalf of the D C. R. Hackworth the free act an day of , 1990, ary Public within and for said ly appeared C. R. Hackworthy, to me , who, being by me duly sworn, did he Managing General Partner of the this instrument was signed on veloper and acknowledged this instrument to be deed of the Developer. e otary Public e - 12 - e CERTIFICATION BY COUNTY ASSESSOR The undersigned, having reviewed the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed and the market value assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed, and being of the opinion that the minimum market value contained in the foregoing Agreement appears reasonable, hereby certified as follows: The undersigned Assessor, being legally responsible for the assessment of the property described in Schedule "A", hereby certifies that the market value assigned to such land and improvements upon completion of the improvements to be constructed thereon shall not be less than until termination of this Agreement. J. Scott Renne County Assessor, Washington County e STATE OF MINNESOTA SSe COUNTY OF WASHINGTON The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1990, by J. Scott Renne, County Assessor of the County of Washington. Notary Public e - 13 - .. ..... o. WHEREAS municipal cor certain Contr Properties II "Developer"), "Agreement") County Record for the Count as Document N the developme Schedule "A" of Minnesota, hereinafter r NOW THE building cons improvements Developer hav Dated 199 EXHIBIT "c" e CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, a oration (the "City") entered into a ct for Development with Curve Crest a Minnesota Partnership (the dated as of November 13, 1990, (the nd recorded in the Office of the r or the Registrar of Titles in and of Washington and State of Minnesota, mber , which provided for t of the following land described in n the County of Washington and State to-wit (such tract or parcel of land ferred to as the "Property"). EFORE, this is to certify that all ruction and other physical pecified to be done and made by the been completed. is day of THE CITY OF STILLWATER e By Wally Abrahamson, Mayor By Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk STATE OF MINN SOTA ss. COUNTY OF WAS INGTON On this day of , 19 ,before e, a notary public within and for said county, perso ally appeared Wally Abrahamson and Mary Lou John on, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sw rn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Cler of the City of Stillwater, that said instrument was signed on behalf of said City by authority of 'ts Council; and said Mayor and City Clerk acknowl dged said instrument to be the free act and deed f said City. e Notary Public - 14 - e e I.{\ ....... ~ SIGN ELEVATION Y4"./'-o. ",,(~<') \~ '-\ ' t.\. ~0 ..-------------- '\ - .- \ (1 1..\-\-1)) \ fkJ~!)~' \ 9; \~ III ~ ~\ ,ot ., J1..- ~v ' 'l- 20 ~ cC \<R ' LIO" S 1-.0h~~,,>e'" ' .... I~' - ('5/6;/ FA CE:-) ':t:J I!.- A-LA.. 7E.;(;!E47S ~ -E: E::L- . P'II"/f!!:; bA 51!:- eA OE:;- 5f{f;; DAtA-- LOr .4RE:A 14-4)789 '5<::).':1'. (5.3'.2.Ac;;I{J:) eU/L.oJ/'-I4 c..oVE:.RACiE:- BUt LOIN4 'A' 8 VI '-01'" Ct '6' 'IOTAL- b0.~DII",~'5 ;! PAVE:.D A~~4 e 1 '7, 8 ~ t4~. ;;-r: /~.'2.?~f. 31, o8t;::r~~q. FT. (~/.13% OF ~- 108 ~'7.3 ~. F7. (1J7.1.~ ()r J-D1) J _1(/..". ~ _ ~ _./ _..- 1_.,..' e .. ... ~SeJ ENC/NEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, $I PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 November 20, 1990 MINNESOTA BOULEVARD RE: STILLWATER, CURVE CREST STORM SEWER L.I. 271 SEH FILE NO: 91115 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth street Stillwater, MN 55082 e As authorized on November 13, 1990, we have prepared this Feasibility Report for the construction of storm sewer to serve a portion of Curve Crest Boulevard west of washington Avenue. This report was initiated by petition of more than 35 percent of the abutting property owners. Drawing No. 1 shows the proj ect location. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A 42 inch storm sewer presently exists on Washington Avenue at the intersection with Curve Crest Boulevard. It is proposed to connect to an existing manhole on this system and extend an l8 inch RCP storm sewer west for approximately 300 feet. Fifteen inch (15") mains will then be extended to the north and south right-of-way lines. MSA funds may be used for these drainage improvements, therefore, plans must conform to MSA standards and be approved by the District Engineer. Drawing No. 2 shows the proposed storm sewer improvements. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated costs for the storm sewer construction is $32,700. This cost includes 5 percent for construction contingencies, and 30 percent for engineering, administrative, legal and capitalized interest costs. This cost is for the work to be constructed within City right-of-ways. A detailed cost estimate is attached. e SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. 5T PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN e City of Stillwater November 20, 1990 Page #2 COST RECOVERY In the Industrial Park, within the storm sewer improvement district, City policy has been to assess drainage improvements on an acre basis. City MSA funds are also available for use on this improvement. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The improvements as outlined in this report are feasible. We would recommend that the improvements be constructed as proposed. sinfi;c. f J- Barry C. Peters, P.E. e BCP/cih I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of t~tate of Minnesota. -fS~_C. ~ DA TE : -1 f IZo/ q () REVIEWED BY: t:1Grhr.J... 8. - \lIed 1(( c REG. NO. ~ 14148 f$cf DATE: e e e e HtGH sc.. ~ ~ j . .. . ~ ! .. ox I I _...L II EXCePTION ... .. z ... => ~ .RUNK HtGHWAY' NO. 36 . FRONTAGE ROAD I -.:.._____~J __ ___.... . ,!!S-.". A"SaJ FILE NO. 91115 .. S~ILLWATER, MINNESOTA . LOCATION MAP DRG. NO. 1 - ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PL.ANNERS e' e ~~ - - VI U' - - - CJI Q ~ ~-O"~C.P ~~ /=set eNGINeeRS. AflCHrrECT'S · PLANNeRS - 0) - ~ (') -0 rv U> 90 ~C ~ fT\ (') :n fT\ (j) -4 .OJ ~ o ",,~Sr\\NG"ON f:a.\JE. 0:> 0_ 7 ~-~~ z _ rv_ ~(jI1 \ 0=;' ..,. In ~~ \E \. S1\LLWA1ER, M\NNES01A CUR\lE CRES1 BL\lO. f\LE NO, 91115 ORG. NO. z' e STILLWATER, MINNESOTA CURVE CREST BLVD. STORM SEWER LI 271 SEH FILE 91115 11/20/90 STORM SEWER ITEM UNIT . EST. . NO. ITEM . UNIT PRICE : QUANT. TOTAL I ----------------------------------:------------------:------------------------: 2021.501 MOBILIZATION . L.S. 1,000.00 , 1 1,000.00 , , 2211.501 CLASS 5 AGG. BASE , TON 8.00 I 340 2,720.00 . I 2331.504 BIT. MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE: TON 180.00 I' 8.1 1,458.00 I 2331.508 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON 24.00 I 55 1,320.00 , 2331.514 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 22.00 . 85 1,870.00 . 2341.504 BIT. MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE: TON 180.00 3.6 648.00 2341.508 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE TON 30.00 55 1,650.00 2357.502 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL. 2.00 50 100.00 0501.602 CONNECT TO EX. MANHOLE EACH 500.00 1 500.00 2503.541 15" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 27.00 100 2,700.00 2503.541 18" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 29.00 285 8,265.00 2506.506 CATCH BASIN TYPE Y L.F. 90.00 13.6 1,224.00 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 250.00 2 500.00 e --------------- --------------- SUBTOTAL 5% CONSTRUCTION CONTENGENCY $23,955.00 1,197.75 =============== ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION 30% ADMIN,ENG,LEGAL & CAP. INTEREST TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $25,152.75 7,545.83 =============== $32,698.58 e ~ ({-(-> , n. 1.eJh. h '1.f. "-' u't. ('out '1. ! ..tou~ c:> eof. h dtOf.tJ..Uf. 55082 II/s-, 'ie 9 ,$ixt'1. dV'\.LtJ..tJ... 80 I tf.'t., ,$ Hh.~'Jo. ~ . .ff,/f,~ .;. ~ . -r: rt- H0'--"~.;! -Iv ~ ~ ~ p ~ PI ~;V r '.-J ..;, ~ J ~ -+--:,J ~ tj... ~ . ~ .J .--; / ~:-. ~'. ~~ rrt- ~ . ~ f . o-<-f ~ ~ /~~ ~ 1 ~ . 10'" ~ ~ ~...-J- j;;:1. .~ r c~ . ~ L?J 3-- ~-~ j ~ q/I . P ,L ~ ~~::~~/~r:~ rI- ~ .-v ~~ '~~~~r rI- ~. ~;? eP~~ r~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..~ .,.. e e . ~. ~~r.~ ...tI ~ ;., /_~.;. ~~ V'/ ' /f.L-- ~y- / ',~. . ~~ r/ ~rT~ :/4 ~ -:g;;; " . ~ ~,,(.~. ~ ~~-L~~ !f-i /r · t e r illwater ~ - - ~ --- -r\. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO GIVE PRIVATE ROAD TO THE CITY OF STILLWATER LOCATED IN GREENS TOWNHOMES. The property owners of the Greens Townhomes are requesting tha~ the City accept title to the private road that was constructed to access the development. The road does not meet City street standards. (See attached memo from the Public Works Director). e Typically, private roads are not built to City street standards regarding width or construction materials. This can represent an additional cost for maintenance and reconstruction of the private street and difficulty in snow plowing (turn around). The private street is a choice the developer'made when he proposed the project. This sometimes is done to get more units on the site. If the private road is accepted, it may be difficult to get higher City standards for public roads in other situations. RECOMMENDATION: Denial of request. e CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 e e e i ~ ~H~ate~ ";,:",, "" E OF ." N EO ,~ MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: DAVID JUNKER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1990 SUBJECT: CITY ACCEPTANCE OF GREENS TOWNHOMES. The street is twenty two feet wide, not including the curb. This is substandard and may be difficult to maintain. No parking would be allowed on either side. This situation should seriously be considered because of what it may mean to other areas. CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 e e e ~ r illwater "~ - - ~ -- -~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA . J MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL OF FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED ON WEST POPLAR STREET IN THE RA, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. DAVID ROETTGER AND LARRY DAUFFENBACH, APPLICANTS. A preliminary plat was approved for this subdivision. The final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat. A drainage easement will be recorded for the detention pond when the grading for the pond is completed. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with condition. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. A grading plan, including the detention pond and berm, shall be approved before final plat recording. Grading and drainage improvements shall be completed before completion or occupancy of any housing unit. ATTACHMENT: Preliminary final plat. CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 ~ BARRETT M. STACK, LANe> SURVEYOR' 9090 FAIRY J='ALLS ROAD NORTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 612.439.5630 ~. ""':'':'',..-, David Ro~ttg&r & Larry Dauffenbach DATE November 13, 1990 . _ . ..- . "' ........M...._. ..._ _ .." _"._. ..... . ,_. ..._, ......._..~..__._ .._..~_..~_...... .~" u__.._'. "',<,"..>'-.- -, " Stillwater, Minnesota SUBJECT.. Plat Dear Sirs: Herewith prelimina copies of the plat.. Please review and c nfirm Lotsi~es, utility easements, etc. As we discussed, the water retention structure isto be built as well as a drainagesWaTe alOng n'lYTitie-bf the Tots. . ..... The s w a I es h ou I db e. 9 ra dedwi th i nt h e -15 foot-wi dee a sement s how n?p~_h e p I a tan d . b e set up j to d r a i n e' ly to the w; ate r r e ten t ion area.Conta~tDick Moore @ SEH, City Engr., for additional det~ils. Per my conversations with Dick, the retentidnareashbUld-tbntaThatd least 540Q.cu .ft.ofstorage.(3'.x 40 IX 45') After--the-.grad-ing-is---done;I will locate the retention area and describe an easement on the' ortion of ~ :C~I ~ ~;~ ~ : e: / ~ e ::r ~ ~ ::~:: ~a~~ n: h:h ~ i ~ ~~ee~S r~: c; ~~ d ~~ S ~;~-~ 1 :~~ :rn~o . -- .._._~_.- 5th St. This should be -reviewed by the City AttorneY.-d Any questions, please call. SinCerelY~' .-~~ . ......... ............ ..._... .._. .......d. ... " '. .,.. _ .,.: ., .... ___,...d .. 0" .. " -,.':-: -,'- " .. .. .. .. .. " .-' .. .. [ .. - , ~,^.c.c'pa.V e'M a.ClriLissOnC i f,,"l'.Fty ~_ REORDER FORM Nfl, B2380l. DAY.T1MiRS. Allonlow,t!'Pa. ',doh'1 . e ~SEH ;f/ ~ ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5T. PAUL. MINNE50TA 55110 612490-2000 e November 7, 1990 RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA CITY ENGINEER SEH FILE NO: 89114 Mr. Barrett M. Sta City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth S reet Stillwater, MN 55 82 Surveyor Dear Mr. Stack: We are writing th' s letter in response to questions regarding storm water retai age for the Dauffenbach/Roettger subdivision. These are parcel numbers 9021-2500, 9021-2550 and 902l-2700. These parcels are ocated on the north side of Poplar Street west of North 5th Stree and east of North Everett Street. We have investigat d and determined that a detention area of size similar to 45' x 40', 3' deep, will retain the excess runoff between the undev loped state and the developed state of the above referenced properties. This detention area should be located adjacent t the north property line of parcel 902l-2700. e Also, a swale an berm should be constructed along the north property line of his parcel to prevent any excess storm water from running onto he next adjacent property to the north. We are also inclu ing a copy of the survey notes which we used for the design of roposed storm sewer through this area. ---- Upon completing th design of the detention area and grading plan for the proposed ubdivision, you should submit the information along with your c lculations for drainage to Mr. Steve Russell, Community Developm nt Director, City of Stillwater. Mr. Russell will then direct u to review the plan as City Engineers. If you have any urther questions, please do not hesitate to contact the unders gned. Sincerely, Richard E. Moore, P.E. REM/cih Enclosure e cc: Mr. steve Rus ell, Community Development Director SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. SI PAUL. MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FAL1.5. WISCONSIN ---- e e e . - ~ NO. SUB/90-23 CITY OF STILLWATER Permit Fee $60.00 Date Fee Paid 5/4/90 ZONING USE PERMIT 0 Certi ficate of Compliance 0 Rezoning 0 Sign 0 Special Use Permit 0 Variance 0 Conditional Use Amended 0 Planned Unit Development 0 G.rading ~ Approval of Preliminary Plat Applicant: LARRY J. DAUFFENBACH Address: 321 West Hazel Street City/State/Zip Code: Stillwater, MN 55082 Property Description: See attached property description. Zone District: R-A, Single Family Residential Permitted Uses: A major subdivision of three lots consisting of 21,750, 21,750 and 43,500 square feet into four lots, all of which consist of approximately 21,750 square feet. Subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The subdivider shall submit a drainage plan that shows how existing and increased runoff due to development can be accommodated without adversely affecting properties between the site and Willow Street. Drainage easements shall be provided as required. The drainage plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and the drainage improvement, once installed, maintained by the property owner. that any changes from Date e . PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW ~ CASE NO. SUB/90-23 e e Planning Commission Meeting: May 14, 1990 Project Location: On Poplar Street between North Fifth Street and North Everett Street. Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Zoning District: RA Applicant's Name: Larry Dauffenbach Type of Application: Variance PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A major subdivision of three lots consisting of 21,750, 21,750 and 43,500 square feet into four lots, all of which will consist of approximately 21,750 square feet. DISCUSSION: The request is to subdivide three lots into four lots as shown on the attached site plan. The three lots presently do not have City water or sewer connections due to the fact that there is no water or sewer extension to this area of North Stillwater. The City requires that in order to have on-site system, a lot must be 20,000 square feet. These 21,750 square foot lots meet this minimum requirement. The City Engineer reviewed the proposed subdivision with the applicant on May 3, 1990. It was concluded that no development should occur on the eastern edge of Lot 4 in order to allow the drainage ditch that is presently located on that lot from the drainage on the south side of Poplar Street could continue to traverse in the same location. It was also suggested that a swale be constructed closer to the edge of the Schell property so the drainage could be diverted away from their drainfield. Lot 3 should be graded as to drain across the northerly edge of Lot 4 in order to take advantage of the swale area. The City Engineer also suggests that drainage should be maintained between Lots 1 and 2 so that it would enter an existing storm water drainpipe behind Larry Dauffenbach's house. The applicant has submitted perk tests for each lot. They have been reviewed and determined to be adequate. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The Subdivider shall submit a drainage plan that shows how existing and increased runoff due to development can be accommodated without adversely affecting properties between the site and Willow Street (see attached SEH report). Drainage easements shall be provided as required. . . RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: The proposed land division is consistent with the use and lot size require- ments of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. e ATTACHMENTS: - Existing condition site plan. - Proposed subdivision. - Engineer's report. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM ENDATION: Approved as conditioned. e e e e e ,. .- n Ci..IIYII"l1tj r lIU r {! SUBJECT TO REVISION r, ,r V ~ sr, 1= = v ~w - - .I Sc a I e , feet In -- ~ '". :'".. I Inch 'f 60 Fee 1 HINN TRANS MllScl'1 ~ LAK~ or CIIOIX cates 1/2" I. D. Iron Pipe Set Marked With a Plastic Plug r i bed RLS 13774. ation of This Bearing System is Assumed. l1' ;,-Jl \I~ ~ >:: NtJ/lTH (No .sCALE) ! VICINI TY MAP SEC,21, T30N-R20W k"~"".~. L 5?;M/~ ............ /Y..t t::.e. " 5"",-,ZI, '.... T.TP~ ~ 1:0"/. -~. , E,LINI: . _ _ " N'wj: .- i Iv vO I I ; /47.00 / <! ;;;<:14 /4-11 00 /4-.7. 4t:J ~ ''''''~/'i/T/''::; E>'Mr.21" 'I -- --- --~ #1 - -, -l ,- -- - 1/5 "- Bloc k I I ,~I I ~~\ II:) I ,~ \II ~ ~ ~ ~l ~ I~ "S I~ ~ ~ "'I ~I ~ I I ,. ~ 2 3 \' 4 .':1- ~ ' ~ ~ I' ~I , ~~ "- ~ I I 0 ,?/, 7:74.$,;Jr, I " ~ z~ 770 fo? rr. ~I I z~ 7Ft:) 54. rF I Z~ 77'17 5~, rr. "- I I " ne _.J ~ -1 6L -.J~ J t-iJ.e.AfNAtflf ,..' t/T"<:.,1'1-~ LSM~ ~L- /. I" ,,'" -J 15 - - - I - - - - --", ,~ I 47,Ot) /4:>'00 /45: 00 /47: 00 5884!?Z'54"W 5"80 PO , \\) ,r) I '} \.;,. I ":i , I " "\ o. - J S,V)() ~ ~ ~ " . ~ I ' tl) i ~ ..... ~ I ~ :t I ~. \ ') l' , :7d. 00 L_ I." I J."JlE.5 ;,- /V8845"'z'S-?-'~ 5".5'000 r~--0 ~ ,If c:- . I r- 4 r1 ~l. :,;. ;'-/E E .=- T '" .. ,>' ... , I J r ~ - - - - ",/ ...... ~ '-.. " W~.O,J, CD. ..:rr"'N4" 1"10",", C~"", ':>~C". o!. r JoA/, L .?t"f .I .' , , ; , - --- N88~5Z'54-"E 264-8.4/ --- e LIST OF BILLS EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 8397 e Election Judges Action Rental Arrow Building Center A T & T Bd. of Water Commissioners Bryan Rock Products, Inc. Business Machine Sales Capitol Communications Courier, The Crowley, Lucille District II Hockey Earl F. Andersen and Associates Ecolab Pest Services Equipment Supply, Inc. FlipTrack Learning Fred's Tire Company General Safety Equipment Gopher State One-Call HWM Technologies I. C. B. O. Jae's Precast, Inc. Johnson Housemovers Johnson, Mary Lou Junker Sanitation Service Magnuson, David McGladrey & Pullen McGough Construction Company Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Miller Excavating r~. Conway Fire & Safety MTI Distributing Company Municilite Company Nasvik, Joe North Star International Reliable Office Supply River City Beverage Russell, Stephen St. Croix Car Wash St. Paul pioneer Press Stillwater Book & Stationery Stillwater Gazette Surburban Propane Taystee Baking Company Thommes & Thomas White Bear Dodge e General Election Concrete Timbers-Lily Lake Arena Long Distance Calls Repair/Replace Hydrant Crushed Rock Maintenance Contract Remove/Install Radios Publications Book Ad for Yearbook Signs Pest Control Seasonal Maintenance Base Training Course Tire and Change Folding Ladder Locate Requests Remove Gas Tanks Membership Cover-storm Sewer Move House-Orleans St. Mileage Boxes/Lift Stations Legal Services Services-Oak Glen Adjust SAC Charges Sewer Service Charges Drainfield Rock Refills Bushing Repairs/strobe Light Curb & Gutter Auto Parts Folders/Stamp Concession Supplies Reimburse-Car Wash/Parking Squads washed Sidewalk-Sno Removal Ao Office Supplies Zoning Map Amendments Propane Concession Supplies Tree Removal Weather strip Gasket 4 , 541. 51 260.00 3,205.94 130.65 1 , 43 9 . 84 67.42 75.00 175.00 58.26 10.00 110.00 66.27 195.00 36.73 145.95 191.30 55.00 40.00 7,107.50 150.00 268.00 2,500.00 10.50 2,076.50 6,198.15 195.00 130.00 70,033.98 83.23 132.00 7.71 429.50 122.82 13 . 28 13.64 187.00 18.24 32.00 275.20 717.85 427.50 125.64 60.00 185.00 18.37 ADDENDUM TO BILLS Bill's Bluff Bait Beberg, Byrdie Business Equipment Bro~erage ' C. B. S. Ltd. Croix Oil Company Gun N Smith Mte. Engineering, Ltd. Mn. State Fire Dept. A~ sn. Motorola, Inc. Northern States Power Company Northern States Power Company Nasvik, Joseph Newman Traffic Signs st. Croix Cleaners Uniform Unlimited Water Products Company Zee Medical Service Ice Auger Computer Entrys Cassettes/Ribbons Service Agreement Unleaded and Diesel Cleaning/Repairs 2 Safety Lights Hernbership Service Agreement Energy Charges Lily Lake Arena Steel Door-Cave Handicap Parking Signs Laundry Uniforms Clapper Arm/Gasket Safety Glasses ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL THIS 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990. APPROVED FOR PAY~ffiNT 186.99 183.75 73.20 289.62 9,373.58 35.00 21. 89 165.00 176.55 3,827.84 2,315.46 700.00 49.63 31.20 1,896.31 584.46 10. 50 e e e CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS e November 20) 1990 Brewster & Sons Roofing Roofing New 4405 Olson Lake Tr. No. Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042 J. A. Chaves Excavating Excavators Renewal 15975 Putnam Blvd. Afton, Mn. 55001 Hicks Concrete Construe.,Inc. Masonry & Brick Work New 805 Tower Dr. Medina, Mn. 55340 Northland Construc.Mgt., Inc. General Contractor New 5275 Edina Indus. Blvd. Sui te #106 Edina, Mn. 55435 TAXI LICENSE Valley Chauffeurs '84 Ford Crown New P.O. Box 794 Victoria (Additional car) Hudson) Wi. 54016 e OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES John I s Bar Renewal 302 South Main St. Kinsel's, Inc. Renewal 119 E. Chestnut St. South Hill Liquor Store Renewal 117 W. Churchill St. Vittorio's Renewal 402 So. Main St. R & R Li quo r Renewal 1971 So. Greeley St. WINE LICENSES Silver Lake Restaurant Renewal 241 So. Main St. Rivertown Inn Renewal 306 W. 01 ive St. e MOT Foods, Inc., dba Mickey's Cafe & Creamery Renewal 324 So. Main St. 1 C US ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES American Legion Post #48 103 So. Third St. Stillwater Country Club 1421 No. Fourth St. Stillwater Lodge #179 - E1 s 279 E. MYrtle St. Stillwater Knights of Co1u us 1910 So. Greeley St. U.S. Bench Corp. 3300 Snelling Minneapolis, Mn. 55406 MISCELLANEOUS 12 locations 2 Renewal e Renewal Renewal Renewal Renewal e e e e e TheTravelerSj The Travelers Companies 6465 Wayzata Blvd. P.O, Box 59220 Minneapolis. MN 55459-0220 Fax# 612 541-4377 City of Stillwater i16 North 4th. St. Stillwater, MN 55082 November 16, 1990 Attn: Risk Manager RE: Our Insured: Medtronic Our File No: DX49968 J Our Employee: Genevieve Sand Date of Loss: October 4, 1990 Dear Claim Department: We provide the Workers Compensation Insurance for Medtronic and have been called upon to provide benefits for Genevieve Sand. Ms. Sand was injured when she tripped and fell on the sidewalk of Mertyl Ave. near the Lowell Inn. Based on our investigation the sidewalks in the area of Ms. Sands accident are not well maintained. We feel the disrepair of the sidewalk is the direct cause of Ms. Sands injury. As a result of this accident Ms. Sand suffered a lumbar strain and right knee sprain. Please be advised that under our rights of subrogation, we will be looking to you for reimbursement of payments made on behalf of Ms. Sand. I would appreciate acknowledgement of this letter, by a response from the representative assigned to this claim. Thank you for your cooperation. f~~ *$ Richard F. Scott Sr. Claim Representative Subrogationl 612-541-4178 HOME OFFICE One Tower Square Hartford. CT 06183 Linda Robison Manager Claim Department Minneapolis Office e e e v' , ,~ , CLAIM AGAINST CITY OF STILLWATER NAME OF CLAIMANT t41A KV, )), c:hLel'1z-- (w) )'1'1- /Ljlb PHONE NO. (/1) t:/39- $/691- ADDRESS p.>?,-~ fA )/?OrJJ?,'dts.cr WHEN DID EVENT OCCUR? ()!!'obeA.. //.1/7 L r2?, /99D ../ WHERE Dr 0 EVENT OCCUR? /Vo R jjJJ4r1rf /: tlcl (" c'A70/,-. woa/ A' o<..;e~ ) WHAT HAPPENED? ,I P",R'rAIO 1e7,,:/eTS. /11 tIz~ Po TAh A J~~ VrO ~ :;: (!04T/4i'('e.Jl t046/};tt.j To-rJ t7oV"T'( 6A.e,e:+ ~ -!>t.'I"",ofIlT 111<f1r/ 1') t-Uh,; .-" TI/,<trl PO/It€.. 0 ~t.'t~,K (t..'?'~''{i DAv ~f.."Y1A/l~" -> 1lJ ply flA(!Y!' O~ }(e.5>.'cil!'rlc!<? /l v rlJ Ml;> b .'l e. A V/.b? hI t!tP J4 ;:?e/oJ (I T ..--? I'D I o //ze r...ti',o-L<!i A,..,d /VO::>"r11f6) 0,1.., o~ TI..""- ~/~h t<;,/rclfJ. P;.:Sf,q,&lh.,d2 A s/,;/lwAri1'1't- H€ ~o.4luAT~O .my WHY DO YOU FEEL THAT THE CITY WAS AT FAULT? :r &'""TY'1t!,('t"S2 b;I'K RI.el1vrvL /1/1. /O-dfi-CZoC:t'h" ,f/JI(/,.eM~{l /fit? d4T Ale A>/( /.Jr:>T .:5<""(0..//". OM "'-{. Tlte ~/.JT46/e 71"'/"'1:< /-IT ;JR 6::?o;YWo"c! f.eJ./; T.1 1ld,.//r:o:J,A J .lie -rYl!u~,n",,(? ffie ri~r 7i~ t. ',,1 ,,-I- -< T,' /10V\U({ tv" <,tcl.~ &Je'a 7i~ 2>,4fi1~ €. { STATE THE NATURE OF THE DAMAGE AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED ICf >?~ Olc/m"h: Ie - t;,q//lI,5 :;;, u f((t!n1 to - Difl11/1(:!/ /?;A~:-'J:-~ of;q g:<~){eo'1 /-l/l1'z:'P1 /l A /l SmAil j:)tP/l'( ..> /'rncf ?jti/ll (-5tJRArt'At'~_ NAME OF PERSON MAKING REPAIR; OR GIVING CARE _~T;I(WAT~/( /lhTo/lS -~-e~ v ES,,-J11 -e. /J- /;:)-10 DATE You have to formally notify the City in writing within thirty (30) days of the occurrence of an event whereby you feel you have suffered damages. ESTIMATE OF REPAIRS STILLWATER MOTOR COMPANY 1"88;1 .1.1 '+ , , ... ~ Phone: 439.4333 5900 Stillwater Blvd, North ~ BUICK -*- Jeep .~r-. CHEVROLET STILLWATER, MINN, 55082 s.~ (\ ~':t SHEET NO, OF SHEETS ME r::c PH~~_R~ C; 7 r;:E_/~_ 9b ~~~ F L~(")^ A_ W"'" ,.,.,.0 ^ ~ ,.LJ q \. ^ A YEAR MAKE MODEL Q~' ?~ rCENSE NO. SPEEDOMETER (J SERIAL NC IVIN NO,I ~~ ("'\0-'.... r ,. n-.,.....!.v.Io ~ L oJ 7 J , <010 \S.~ \ e:,. ~ N .. ~ 7 U )( r...,. M 33/7;; INSURANCE CARRIER TYPE OF INSURANCE I] I ADJUSTER PHONE IVEHICLE LOCATED AT SUBLET PAINT COST PARTS COST LABOR COST REPAIR REPlACE PARTS NECESSARY AND ESTIMATE OF LABOR REQUIRED COST ESTlMA TE ESTIMA TE ESTIMA TE ESTIMATE ./ Rt f,.,..--\t"\.... 4- " ""'" 1: ,q ;:L.. ,0 ;). \ .~ / ~o ,~ ^^- ,.. Q- - .- \C\ 00 - ~ - ,:::' ~ -r:: tU2. -, _t..t ,X ~ ~ ~..:-'Cn '.:.... () ~D I.Ir rOn.... c...o-r...:t \ ,S ~ao .-\ +- .-r' ,+ \ ,C:; R;-"'!. Q .... Q-'~t\ ^ - """ .... \~ ~. I -:-0- n _ 1_'-.1 \ 10 ~ \ V ~ - --G: '} -- ----:- ~. I' \ .J AL PART NEW ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED TOT ALS 90 '-Ie Jt:tLf 36 J 9 00 J3CJ S INSURED PAYS $ INS, CO, PAYS $ R,O, NO, GRAND TOTAL '-13 't ~ , - INS, CHECKS PA Y ABLE TO The above is an estimate, based on our inspection, and does not cover additional parts or labor WRECKER SERVICE which may be required after the work has been opened up, Occasionally, after work has started. worn, broken or damaged parts are discovered which are not evident on first inspection, Quotations on parts and labor are current and W to change, _MATE MADE BY , Irl1...vn..Q Authorization For Repairs, You are hereby autho(J.ed to make the above specified repairs to the vehicle TAX b S described herein, 'NE DO NOT GUARANTEE RUST REP.u.mS TOTAL OF SIGNED DATE 19 ESTIMATE 'f '-I 0 7 3 - o o 6 b '188-01375 NORICK OKLAHOMA CITY.T,\ , , z.~ .<~.",---- "~Jf> ~/' November 6. 1990 e Nile Kriesel. City Administrator 216 North 4th Street Stillwater. Hinnesota 55082 Dear Hr. Kriesel: Hy name is Hark Ehlenz and I reside at 2830 Woodridge Lane in Stillwater. I am a volunteer soccer coach for the VAA (Valley Athletic Association). On October 21. 1990. the VAA held its annual soccer day. The team that I coach played their games at the Croixwood Lower fields. starting at 0900 hours. On this particular day. the wind was extremely strong. I happened to park my car next to the "Port-Q-Let" portable toi lets. Some time between 0900 hours and 1000 hours. one of the portable toilets was blown over on my automobile (I986 Oldsmobile. Calais Supreme). Upon returning home. I contacted the Washington County Sheriff's Department {approximately 1010 hours}. who in turn dispatched a Stillwater Police Officer to report to my place of residence. At about 1035 hours. Officer Larry Dauffenbach reported to my place of residence and made an accident report. e On October 29. 1990. I contacted "Port-Q-Let" portable toilet service at the following phone number. 445-5159. I was told that they are not responsible for the damage to my automobile and that I should contact a Hr. Dick Blekum at 439-4561. I contacted Hr. Dick 8lekum on October 29. at about 1030 hours. He informed me that he recently exchanged a portable toilet at the Croixwood Park and did not secure/fasten the toilet. He informed me that the City of Stillwater would cover the damages to my automobile and that I needed to submit this letter to you. Damage to the automobile is minor. basically a broken antenna. a small dent. and paint scratches. I am willing to bring the car to any garage in Stillwater for repairs. I can be contacted at the address noted on the first paragraph of this letter or at the following telephone numbers. 439-8691 (Home) and 119-1416 (Work). Thank you for your attention in this matter. ~ HE:da e cc : f i I e v ~ >~ ,...0 o ~. ~ e e e Stillwater Public Library MEMO Diane- 12 November 1990 I have enclosed the materials for the City Council on all of our remaining1990 capital expenditures but one. We are still looking for a microfilm reader/printer at the price we were quoted during budget preparation time. We have a number of salespeople sharpening their pencils and looking for reconditioned machines. We will get that information to you as soon as possible. 10 t,(!, (-' '. .' ;' '1\.,' '.......:::-:, Lynne ) 1./ J 0 / (',/ <".')!J -* e e e Informational Video Display Supplier Demco Compact Disc Display Supplier Richard Wente Studios 3 frames at $99.95 each 3 six shelf racks at $184.95 each Total $299.85 554.85 $854.69 $200.00 \.;/ - I .... CIIl GIGI E:::: 0.0. .- 0. :S:s $en >al$ c( \ . C .. :s II.. ~ III .. .Q :::i \ \ e 278 \l! Douhle Frame utilizes 2 wood frames & 2 revolvers A 24" x 24" frame can accommodate up to 4 revolving unils of different types of media Give your paperbacks, video cassettes, audio cassettes or compact discs high visibility and easier access with these Revolving Racks in a solid wood frame · Attach frames together in a zig-zag fashion or wall mount A simple. y,'l innovaliv~ idca li>r storing alld displayillg YOllr papcrhaeks, em1\paet discs, audio casselles, . vidco eass~ltcs! A solid wO(l(kn frame lIlay he allachcd to anothcr framc of its sizc and design to ti.m\', ,'onlcm\h.rary zig-zag display unit. Framcs may also be individually wall mounted from one of its side panel In eilhcr situation, rcvolving aerylk shelves ,Ire .lssemhled inlo the wood frame, Shelves are adjustahle. I(~ There arc two frame sizes nmde of IX." x 1%" solid wood depending on which items are displayed on Ihe revolvin shelves, The 24"W frame will ac,'onu1\odate one revolving unil holding compact discs in their jewel cases, Th 30"W frame holds one revolving rack whkh Slores video casselles, paperhacks or audio casselles. Include. with the frame: pole, washer, easy instructions, 2 wood screws, and 2 bolts and 'I' nuls. Video display has t shelves of 8 pockets each, with a capacily of 144 video casselles. Paperback unit has 7 shelves of 8 pucket each and a capacily of 224 hooks, Audio Casselle Rack has II shelves of 8 pockets each, with a capacity 0 264 hoxed casselles. Compact Disc rack contains 8 pockets un each of 9 shelves, with 360 "\II1\pa,'t disc cal'.I\'ity Frame and revolving unit sold separately. In stock for next day shipment. 24" Frame for Compact Disc Revolver. 62"11, !.:!ght Oak English Oak Walnul 1'147-0440 1'147-0441 1'147-0442 e for Video/Paperback/Audio Cassette Revolver. 62"11, En 'Iish Oak Walnut 1'147-0451 1'147-0.&52 "I appreciated your fast, courteous dependable service," "Oun', Wl1l'll I h'as dl'.'!N:roll'. I f1/an:d II p/u1IIe ordt'r clnd YOll ,lhil'l't'd il/lIlIt'ditll"'.\', ,. Lois Trahing Sanla Cnll, lIigh Scho,,1 Lihmry Santa Cruz. CA I Ea, 3+ Ea, $109,95 $1)9,95 lEa, ~ $109,95 1)9,95 . lEa, 3+ Ea, $209.95 $199.95 219,95 199.95 199.95 184.95 224,95 214.95 Revolving Display Unit. Ca!. No, Description 1'141-0045 COlllpal'\ Disc Rack 9 shelves 1'141-004(, Pa 'rhack Rack 7 shelves 1'141-0047 Video Casselle Rack 6 shelves 1'141-0035 Audio Casselle Rack 11 shelves Demeo, Inc., P,O. Box 7488, Madison, WI 53707 P.O. Box 7767, Fresno, CA 93747 Pi46-S472- - - - -- CA 9;j1~1 B 7767 Fresno, . WI 53707 P.O. OJ{ , BOJ{ 7488. Madison, Demeo, Inc., P.O. 276 e e e .. RICHARD WENTE STUDIOS ~;i~"~t~fUJ7-"m::~ November 6, 1990 Stillwater Public Library Stillwater, Minnesota I would propose that the modifications that you need for the compact disc storage and books on tape storage should amount to a sum of $200.00 including time and materials. I will be prepared at your convience to do the necessary woodworking and finishing to minimize inconvenience with storage and moving. Sincerely, 0~j 116 NORTH EVERETI ST. STILLWATER. MN 55082 (612) 430-1540 e e e ,~ .. Large Print Shelving Unit Shelving Supplier P.M. Johnson $473.30 Wooden End Panel Supplier Ron's Cabinets 175.00 (est. based on previous purchase) ." e g~Q!ATION Date 11/5/90 IllstillJliOllal EllvinllllllCllh, IIIL, dha /'/iOl/1' (6/2) 6-I5-2ll21) flu (612) 6-15-32(1) S C H 0 0 L OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND J./SI Marshall Ave. · SI. Palll. Minl/esota 5510.1-63../3 '1'0: ~ e 1 1,r~ .-rJi.l"""'r/ '&ir.t<f. 1 ~~ ,\ 1 f;f3i\,~!1'! 3 Stillwater Public Library 223 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Attn: Lynne S. Bertalmio As you requested, we have priced the following items for you: $Unit Total Mfg./Model I/Description Wilson Library Shelving-Black MWF64/36"x42"frame MWF04/30"x42"frame MBS69/Single faced base, 9"x36" MBS09/Single faced base, 9"x30" MC609-SF/Canopy top, 36",single faced MC009-SF/Canopy top, 30", single faced M68/Flat shelf, 8"x36" M08/Flat shelf, 8"x30" $473.30 LOT * ftrvlrdW;~ 5Abl11)i1~oI Price above is F.O.B. Stillwater If installation is requested add Estimated Delivery Time, A.R.O. Prices above good for a period of Not incl.* to total above. 8-10 weeKs' 30 days. If ve can be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate calling. *If an installation/assembly figure is needed, please call Sincerely, C?l!!JtSYkeS Sales Manager e ,\ j','n..//uli:,'./.\'/I'!I,' Iii \',/1,.,.1, i ',11/1 ii, \ Olii,,'\ ('Ollll'd,I,I/' e 1915 N.E. BROADWAY MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 LECTRIC, Inc. Commercial and Industrial Wiring June 15, 1990 Lynne Beftalmio STILLWATER LIBRARY 223 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN. 55082 Dear Lynne: Dymanyk Electric, Inc. proposes to do the following electrical work according to II"xI7" Sheets Pages #1,#2 & #3 sent on June 12,1990 for the sum of: Two Thousand Three Hundred Ninety Dollars . . . . $2,390.00 e Item #1: Lower Level, Remove two (2) Type "D" recessed quartz fixtures, two (2) Type "B" wall mounted fixtures. Furnish and install four (4) blank white cover plates for Type "B" & "D" and two (2) new lx4 recessed Type "F" fixtures. Rewire Type "F" fixtures to existing circuit. Item #2: Lower Level, Remove two (2) Type "D" recessed fixtures and furnish and install two (2) white cover plates. Furnish and install two (2) new Type "R" fixtures, wire Type "R" fixtures to ex- isting circuit. Item #3: Upper Level, Install three (3) Type "D" fixtures and extend wiring for Type "D" fixtures to ex- isting circuit. Total cost of Items #1-#3 . . . . . . . $2,390.00 Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions. Respectfully, Rich Dymanyk e RD/dm e e e Data Base Trainino and Documentation Supplier Dialog Training for two staff members Docu mentation $280.00 110.00 e e e , . Chairs Supplier Demco 10 chairs at $94.95 each $949.50 ,.\.l....;.o ._..~.--~~..,",,-_-.....-.._--_._-,._......................_-"""'-'---~_' Seal Back Seal Seal Cal. No, Heighl Heighl Widlh Deplh Weigh I lEa, 4 Ea, 12+ 1'141-220 14" II" 1311" 12lf2" 12 Ibs, $59,95 $56,95 $52 "141-221 16" 12% " 15% " 14'/''' 14 Ibs, 62,95 59.95 56 1'141-222 IX" 14% " 17',," 16" 17 Ibs, 69,95 66,95 62 It I,.., ~.~~s Ii.. {,~~i,:, ;.'!'!'.' ~/.....,-~-;: 11" ""X-e'::' l"'~@~ ':~:)ft,: i '~t~:;t{: :I.~f';, i!~ f(t~i~( 'J; ~.;,';,Q f~ii " ~:l ~f:*i20,~:i' ,': ")0.\,,\,,' .' ,.,,; "~t\~ f.)~"! '. ,. . \'~)~~\\) , i V '~J,;~:J~::~ \ elt\\~ '1,;'-:- 4,>\.'-,-":; :-">,:);.YhY''''''''' $44 ,lJS :';:4'5'" 56,95 52,95 Solid Oak Chairs for all age groups These classic chairs, made especially for libl :lOd oflic'e use, are allraclive and arc conslrUl from the best Appalachian Oak. All fea saddled solid wood seat which withst: expansion and contmction in varying temperal' and arc faslencd by li,ur screws lhrough co, blocks. Sleambent curved posture positioned e backs and back IXlsts assurc comlilrtable, IXlSI corrcct scating, Extra strength and durab ohtaincd from fully tapered front posts thai joined 10 seal rails hy glued double multi-gnx dowel joints, Slale Finish: Light Oak or I: Oak. Ships by VI'S from N.C. ~ , h,,- (A) Choose from 2 Classic library Chair Styles in Solid Oak These chairs are c.rafted ~rom rich oak for function, com fori and durability, All lumber is thoroughly air se:lsoned before kiln drymg to a moisture content of less than 5%. Seats are held together securely, and b~ckposls an~ lOp slals are steam bent. Side Chair (PI41-333) aV:lilable in 3 linishes to nl:llch your decor. Llbr:IrY Chair (PI41-334) available in 3 woodgrain Iinishes and 4 color stained Iinishes. Ships from IN, " I I ---- Walnut Ruhy Red Sky Blue Ebony Black Sapphire on Oak Green (A) Side Chair with ~" Rubber Cushion Glides. Ships by truck from IN. Seal HI: IS", Overall Dimensions: 32\12"H x 17'I2"W x 2014 "D. Slale Finish: Medium Oak, Light Oak or Walnul. Cal. No. ~f'f""'",,;; _?~-r,,,,_,.~~ !"'~.#.r.-; Med. Oak ~~~ 1.1. Oak 1'141-333 lEa, $104,95 3+ Ea, $99,95 State Finish .I (8) Library Chair. Ships by lruck from IN. Seal Ht: IS". Ovenlll Dimensions: 35'A"H x lS"W x20'l2"D. Slale Finish: Medium Oak, Light Oak, Walnut, Ruby Red, Sky Blue, Ebony Black or Sapphire Green. Cat. No. Descriplion lEa, 3+ Ea. 1'141-334 Slale Finish: Medium Oak, Li 'hi Oak or Walnut $99.95 1'144-284 Slale Finish: Ruby Red, Sky Blue, Ebony Black or Sapphire Green 99,95 322 Demeo P.O. Box 7488. Madison, WI 53707 P,O. Box 7767, Fresno, CA 93747 Rugged Solid Oak Chairs add a splash of style to your decor Now you don't have to sacrilice durability for the of style, These solid oak chairs allmctivcly con both lilr years of dcpemlahle service. Seals and I arc bolted to frame lilr exlm strength and rigi Frame joints and rails arc reinti,rced with dowel screws to withstand rugged daily use. Available or without arms, each chair has Medium Oak lir framc with a colorfully stained scat and hack. 31 x 19'1,"W x 20"D. Scat heighl is 17'/,". Ch,xlse lilllr colors lilr back and seal. Slale Color: Ruby Sky Blue, Sapphire Green or Ebony Black, W 33 Ibs. Ships by truck from IN. . __II Ruby Red Sky Blue Ehony Black Sapp Gre Description lEa, 3+ Chair wilh llnllS $174,95 $16' Chair wlo arms 164,95 15' e e e ATTACHMENT A A G R E E MEN T THIS AGREEMENT made this day of November. 1990. between the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota ("Stillwater") and the City of South Saint Paul, Dakota County, Minnesota ("South Sa i nt Pau 1") as fo 11 ows: 1. Stillwater has agreed to loan to South Saint Paul certain CAP-CHUR equipment commonly known as a tranquilizer gun for temporary use in their Animal Control Department. 2. The terms of the lease with regard to time periods and charges for use will be as arranged from time to time between the police departments of Stillwater and South Saint Paul. 3. South Saint Paul agrees that while this equipment is in their possession and under their control, they will be completely responsible for it and will hold the City of Stillwater harmless from any claims, causes of action or damages that might arise from its use. They will also defend and indemnify Stillwater from any claims, demands or causes of action that are made against the City of Stillwater while the equipment is in the possession and control of South Saint Paul. 4. South Saint Paul further agrees that any claim they might have against the defective design, material or workmanship of the equipment will be made directly against the manufacturer, seller or wholesaler of the equipment and not against Stillwater, and from these claims South Saint Paul hereby releases and discharges St i 11 water. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have set their hands this day of November, 1990. CITY OF STILLWATER By Wally Abrahamson, Mayor B and By Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk B~M~ ~ (\ '~<W Ja s P. Cosgrove, C i C 1 erk r I"-~~'~----~~~~~-~~~~-".'.~~------~----'~'-~-' ~--,-_.,--..~-~~,---~,~_.~.-.,_._-._-----._,-,.-. '-"--'.. ( '. e e r; e .-----.----.,-.--- --.-~--u---C I TY-OF--S TILLWA TER--.-.-.--- GENERAL FUND For the Year ended October 31, 1990 ( -- .... r- -' .\ 7 -..- -. '-'R even u es'- ( " Taxes Lid~hs~s-&-Permit~ Intergovernmental Charges for Services Fines and Forfeits Miscellaneous (-- \ \ " r \ ;, I Total Operating Revenue Transfers In /_. ,,- ! :"oi Total Revenue ..., \ Expen.diture.s-.--._.---. ----.-.-. -- Mayor & Council '-Pe rsonn-e 1--.--- Services & Charges Miscellaneous .- . ~- ; ~\. j.:: I 1.- 1-'" (- 1,::- " I i..HJ i:>' ,.........., \ ,;,- Total Operating Elections Personnel Supplies '---'Serv i c es'-'&'C ha::tges--- Miscellaneous ,-).j i l-~ -~ ,-" ! \ i JJ..: I,. ._ f ( ,. ) ! -- Total operating Capital Outlay '--Adfuiri/P inan.ce"- I C'" Personnel Supplies (' Annual Budget'---- Year to Date 'Actual- Percentage Receivedl Expended - Under (Over) Budget Current Month ------------------------------------------------------- $2,648,433 $0 $1,255,392 $1,393,041 47.40% '120,345 16,876 '80,544 39,801 66.93% 1,000,020 30,000 605,598 394,422 60.56% 237,588 49,110 160,846 76,742 67.70% 96,100 9,452 98,888 (2,788) 102.90% 41,500 341 37,800 3,700 91.08% ------------------------------------------------------- $4,143~986 247,408 $105,779 64,144 $2.239,068 $1,904,918 144,671 102,737 54.03% 58.47% $4,391,394 $169,923 $2,383,739 2,007,655 54.28% --$30~562 6,956 800 - $2-~566--" 190 o $25,551 6,385 1,146 $5,011 571 (346) 83.60% 91.79% 143.25% .. .__.__ .. .__w_._._._ ,____ _'._,___. _" ...,____.._...._...h...._____...___...__.___.._.._______. ------------------------------------------------------- $38,318 $2,756 $33,082 $5,236 86.34% $9,000 $0 $3,908 $5,092 43.42% 550 17 173 377 31.45% -- __.n__.._ 5 3 5 - ", n---2 1 3-----. '-220 315 41.12% 115 0 0 115 0.00% $10,200 $230 $4,301 $5,899 42.17% 100 0 100 0 100.00% ... "'-"-'.P'--'-' $290,529 $25,069 $246,227 $44,302 84.75% 9,975 785 7,489 2.486 75.08% ..- -.--...-. -.- -...... ----..... ~. ".......~..__..- ----... (_"_ ~--'-ce~cc-'-'-="_c>,c-~' .~.~.. ,.. '.",,"c... ccc ,_.W."c_..,." . -r'" '."." .....- .=....,.......,', . ".'c,_....-" -"'-' "'..CO-'_' -,,,~"" " "e'm':~~.~'~~._"" . ~. 'I I ~ i I (' ! -... 1 2, : :": i ji 'I::.! S~rviees-&Charges Miscellaneous 101,032 24,000 . -32 , 7 7 2..... ....... 83 , 19 2 u m 1 7 , 840 8.935 22,293 1,707 "e 82.34% 92.89% ------------------------------------------------------- $425,536 $67,561 $359.201 $66,335 84.41% 24,857 62 15,982 8,875 64.30% $39,204 $3,293 $32,875 $6,329 83.86% 4,000 203 1,313 2,687 32.83% 91,480 9.576 74,017 17;463 80.91% 0 305 305 (305) N/A Total Operating Capital Outlay c n --'Legal/Ci ty"Attorney Personnel Supplies Services & Charges Miscellaneous --Total"'Operatihg $134,684 $ 13'~ 377"""$ 108,510--'-"$26.174 ------------------------------------------------------- "80.57% Plant/City Hall . ...,. ... . "S up p lie s Services & Charges Miscellaneous $10" 3,565 o .,.....,- $ 2,237 38,846 125 $ 3 , 5 13 13,497 75 $5,750 52.343 200 38.90% 74.21% 62.50% ------------------------------------------------------- $58,293 $3,575 $41,208 $17,085 70.69% 14.025 0 5.448 8,577 38.84% $922,551 $78,833 $756,788 $165.763 82.03% 28.041 298-- 18,377'- . 9~664 65.54% 91.113 7,310 78,416 12.697 86.06% 30,019 972 29,584 435 98.55% Total Operating Capital Outlay Police Personnel ,- "-'''-Supplies'' . I ' :,.'! Service & Charges Miscellaneous ~...! i i;"!- i"'('1 "..I ".1 ------------------------------------------------------- $1,071,724 $87,413 $883,165 $188,559 82.41% 79.182 52.403 79.408 (226) 100.29% $398,375 $32,376 $311,235 $87,140 78.13% 15,129 ....... 6 3 1"'''- ...um 5,636" ....- .-. 9 ~4 93.... '37.25% 96,106 3.185 81,276 14,830 84.57% 3.425 150 1,921 1,504 56.09% Total Operating Capital Outlay Fire Personnel .,~;: ... - -. ------ Sup pl i e s'--- ........ :>,,1 Services & Charges I Miscellaneous - - - - - - ...;,......; ~-- - - - - _.~.....;.....;-...;....;...._._.~.~ ~-~''''; - -'-'';'''; - ...;...;,;...;..,;..;.;..,.-'.-'...... .;...--...;..;.. - ----- - -..;.,. _._.;.,.- $513,035 10,141 $36,342 8,539 $400,068 9.389 $112,967 752 -.._.~ ...- ..-.-------.. -. ) Total Operating , 1,')1 Capital Outlay I-"~ !---....--..-- ....-...-...........-.-.--.---........-......... I r~OI :1:1 Civil Defense i.) Personnel $2,100 $178 $1,775 $325 J 77.98% 92.58% 84.52% (". ----'-.--e'.'...--..-.~'-.~-... "-"'-'.-'-'-'-'- ,.. '--'.' . ,,'.- -. .........~._._...._....-.,..,'-..... '~~~..='~--e-'.-~...p...~...... ~ , ! e ! (..;- .~; I.'..; I ! 131 ! Ci~1 Planning & Inspection 1,,:1 Personnel ! .,01--,,-.,,---- S \ip'i.5Ti"es-------..--- ;t 1:,-1 Services & Charges '-,.;.r.,. : . ,- M1scellaneous (1 '....... I ~ ( '. t ....... """ i'.' \...... , ',-, i... , \".., I I '~ , j !.... 1 <(,I ~1411 \Ii~, ...._.._~ (... "Supplies Services & Charges Miscellaneous "'100 1,925 200 o 132 o ...."0 1.333 o 100 592 200 0.00% 69.25% 0.00% ., Total Operating , Capi tal Outlay $4.325 $310 $3,108 $1,217 71. 86% 20,000 0 11,205 8.795 56.03% ._,. '_"__"'__".'__.n...__~_'__.__ $91.881 $8,026 $78.566 $13.315 85.51% 11,300 46 3,287 8,013 29.09% 31,473 1,732, 22,500 8,973 71. 49% 300 3,0 411 ( 111 ) 137.00% Public Works Personnel Supplies" Services & Charges Miscellaneous Total Operating Capital Outlay $134,954 $9,834 $104,764 $30.190 3.000 0 0 3,000 $190,095 $14.770 $158,504 $31,591 91.500 802 -., 31,725 59,775 227,169 12,557 85.217 141,952 3,000 0 162 2,838 77.63% Street Personnel Supplies' Services & Charges Miscellaneous 83.38% 34.67% 37.51% 5.40% Total Operating Capital Outlay $511,764 $28,129 $275,608 $236,156 53.85% 59.508 3.140 18,348 41,160 30.83% $78,355 $5,287 $55.702 $22.653 71. 09% 12.200 783 8,869 3,331 72.70% 21,197 958 11,865 9,332 55.97% 500 0 153 347 30.60% 'I Shop Personnel Supplies Services & Charges Miscellaneous Total Operating Capital Outlay $112.252 24,595 $7,028 o $76.589 4.791 $35,663 19.804 68.23% 19.48% $171,547 n"4~4 50 55,422 1.120 $16,483 $154,858 __.____.h..,.",' 109'-..---.....---..9 2 2-- 2,792 31.311 73 1.025 90.27% 20.72% 56.50% 91.52% $16,689 -....3;528- 24.111 95 -. .. .--.--.-..-----..... ------------------------------------------------------- Total Operating Capital Outlay $19,457 o $232.539 12,000 $44,423 12,000 $188,116 o 80.90% 0.00% ~"""--:~-'~~~-e"~" =v"~,,,~,,",,~""",_."~....-..,.. ...,...". . ...,', ,,"'," ,"'0'.. ,..,..= ,...""..~..~"...,'ao.".. """""e""''''='-'~''''' ,,,~,"_~_='m~"""""~=' ....,.",.,"...~_.",......." ,.,.-.....,.-,-.=.........-...., -,. ~e' .. I (j i I .. ; ;', .., 1__- Signs & Lighting Supplies ...-" """Services & Charges Miscellaneous "I 7 .-----, Tbtal' Operating 1 ! Unallocated Personnel' Services & Charges Miscellaneous i ~.; " Total Operating IU' ).'1 . I I ' : 1 '.-~; I". ' [ i Ot ~'-' i .' , .. ! I .":1.... ,''11 , ;-1 i ,,;i Grand Total Operating Capital Outlay Transfers Out Total Expenditures $10,000 112,000 1,000 $559 10'~ 091'" o $6,133 94,949 o $3,867 '1 7 , 0 5 1 1,000 61. 33% 84.78% 0.00% ------------------------------------------------------- $123,000 $ 10 , 6 50 .. ..... .. $ 10 1 , 082 ....--$2L918 82.18% $31,610 $2;006' "'$25,238 . $6";372 79.84% 1,000 400 2,689 (1,689) 268.90% 5,000 25,021 33,175 (28,175) 663.50% ------------------------------------------------------- $37,610 $27,427 $61,102 ($23,492) 162.46% $3,408,234 $311,333 $2;606,822 $801,412 76.49% 247,408 64,144 144,671 $102,737 58.47% $779,255 $64,938 $649,379 $129,876 83.33% $4,434,897 $440,415 $3,400,872 $1,034,025 76.68% I~~"'-"~#'""'~"'e~~-....,-"~''''.m.''''.''''~' ..,. "..".... ..,...,......,........,.,~.."'..c "c"'...,~._,..~..."~~"...~'_"'~"~~_~~..>.~'".,~".,=.~"....,-~-,-",.,----."~..""..' ....~ c." ....., e I ~ : ! -1 c ;,' :) Revenues Miscellaneous Transfer In-Gen. Fund Transfer In-Cap. Outlay Total Revenue Expenditures mupersonnel' Supplies Services & Charges Miscellaneous Total Operating Capital Outlay Total Expenditures CITY OF STILLWATER PARK FUND For the'Y~ar ~nd~d Oetbb~r 31, 1990 Annual Budget $11,000 266,204 44,553 $321,757 $219,904 23,200 31,875 2,225 $277,204 44,553 $321,757 Current Month $2,316 21,230 8,646 $32,192 $16;671 1,176 2,643 740 $21,230 8,646 $29,876 Year to "Date Actual $11,132 214,179 42,452 $267.763 $178,667 19,113 25,964 1,435 $225,179 42,452 $267,631 Under (Over) Budget ($132) 52,026 2,101 $53,995 $41,237 4,087 5,912 790 $52,026 2,101 $54,127 Percentage Receivedl Expended 101.20% 80.46% 95.28% 83.22% 81.25% 82.38% 81.45% 64.49% 81.23% 95.28% 83.18% e ('---""'_._~""'~'~'-""""""""'" "n.."'......,.~.".,.,~"-".._.~"~.__."~_.-~~,."e....~~~._'......_'^._._~~--,.--~_._.-_.........."."..., I , I ~ ~\...,,-,.,-----_.._------ ('i !;'. j 131 ! ~ i '. . \ i 1...- i .._._....._____~~n.~_______ 1'1 I"' I ., I , ! 1: i '.'1 J'!2 " Revenues Ch~rge ~or Services Book Sales Miscellaneous '-Trarisfet"Trt":'Gen. Fund Transfer In-Cap. Outlay Expenditures Library Operations Personnel "Supplies Services & Charges Miscellaneous Total Operating Capital Outlay Plant Library Personnel ....... sup pli:es.......~.... Services & Charges Miscellaneous Total Operating Capital Outlay Grand Total Ope Capital 1 Total Expenditures $484.406 25,409 $509.815 CITY OF STILLWATER LIBRARY FUND For the Year ended October 31, 1990 Current Month Year to Under Date'....-.. u (Over) . Actual Budget Annual Budget Percentage Receivedl Expended $5.000 $573 $5,383 ($383) 107.66% 300 125 1,125 (825) 375.00% 0 309 3.392 (3,392) N/A 479,106 37,112 .. ... 340.631 138,475 71.10% 25,409 0 18,082 7,327 71.16% $509.815 $303,750 80.020 47.183 3,200 $434,153 7.969 $18,803 3~050 26.500 1.900 $50,253 17,440 $38,119 $368 ,613$141 ~202 $25.963 4,097 2.549 182 $236,803 47,013 19,815 1,007 $66,947 33,007 27,368 2,193 $32,791 o $129,515 4,958 $304,638 3,011 $1,922 '308' 2,060 31 $2,734 1;' 33 2 4.611 58 $16,069 1 . 718" 21,889 1.317 72.30% 77.96% 58.75% 42.00% 31.47% 70.17% 85.46% u 56.33% 82.60% 69.32% $4.321 $40,993 $9,260 81.57% 0 15,071 2,369 86.42% $37,112 $345,631 $138,775 71.35% 0 18.082 7,327 71. 16% $37.112 $363,713 $146.102 71. 34 % e e e Stillwater City Council CITY HALL 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 November 15, 1990 Dear Members of the Stillwater City Council, This letter is to thank you for approving and com-, pleting the work on the hotel loading area in front of the Lowell Inn. I have had many favorable comments from patrons who are now able to let off and load passengers right in front in complete safety and without blocking traf- fic. The elderly patrons particularly appreciate this thoughtfulness. The busses arriving and departing in October also took full advantage of this new convenience. Good things are worth waiting for! The loading area and freedom from meters are no exception. Maureen, Mary and I just want you to know how much it has been appreciated. Arthur V. Palmer CITYN001.DOC e .- DOWNTOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN: TASK FORCE SUMMARY REPORT The city council of the City of Stillwater approved and adopted a plan to test the concept of free parking in the downtown Stillwater area. The council appointed members of the downtown business community to serve as members of the task force and charged them with the responsibility of establishing a comprehensive parking plan for the downtown area., A detailed survey and inventory of all existing parking spaces in 'the downtown area was completed, along with a study of the use and demand for those spaces. The task force implemented a plan designed to address the various needs and demands identified in their study. A permit system for employee parking was established, designed to locate employee parking away from the downtown streets. The result was more immediate and convenient access for business e patrons. Adjacent on-street parking spaces that were formerly monopolized by business employees were once again available to patrons and visitors to the City of Stillwater. A degree of consistency in the location of handi- capped parking spaces as well as "special" parking or loading areas was achieved. Parking zones and enforcement are on a "time-occupied" basis with enforcement personnel chalking tires and issuing citations in accordance with posted time limits for designated parking spaces. Summary: November Ol, 1990 The Downtown Parking Management Plan implemented by the task force is an unqualified success, having met and surpassed the goal of making available immediate and convenient parking to visitors of the Stillwater area. The e .# success of the parking management plan is limited only by the practical e consideration of the finite number of parking spaces available in the downtown area. Further consideration is also given to the physical limitations inherent in the capacity of the sole and solitary individual dedicated to enforcement of the parking ordinances. _ RECCOMMENDATIONS: Parking task force members each accepted assignment to a portion of the , . downtown district and agreed to work as communication liasons with the businesses in that area as well as maintain a regular visual survey of the parking use and needs established in those areas. Based upon the information collected and presented by the individual task force members, this task force makes the following recommendations: e Priority must be given to expanding and increasing the overall number of parking spaces available in the downtown area. Demand typically peaks during the summer months, when a large influx of tourists and visitors to the Stillwater area is experienced. At these times, all available spaces are quickly utilized and demand will exceed availability by a substantial margin. Additionally, the present number of employees participating in the permit parking system already exceeds the number of spaces dedicated to that portion of the program. The practic-al approach to solving these problems is to implement planning and construction of additional parking structures in the downtown area. Although already accommodated in the overall developement plan of the downtown area, it is the firm belief of this task force that these needs would be better addressed by shifting consideration of these e -2- .' , areas of the development plan to an earlier position in progression of the downtown development plan. This task force recommends that the construction ~and completion of additional parking structures be assigned a greater degree of priority and moved up into the first phase of development under the downtown development plan. With these considerations in mind, it is the belief of the task force that a parking ramp or other structure would be ideally located at the property presently owned by the city located at the northwest corner of Olive Street and Second Street. Utilization of ,the as yet unused city owned property located on the Southeast corner of Second Street and Mullberry Street would also contribute significantly to a reduction of the congestion experienced in parking on the north end of the downtown area. The recent relocation of a business located in the downtown area from the south end ~to the north end of the city has contributed significantly to the increased demand for employee parking on the north end of the city. It is also the recommendation of this task force that the city council give due,consideration to expanding the resources available for enforcement of tlepresent parking restrictions. At the present time, one individual is dedicated to enforcement. As a result of the necessity to complete data entry tasks related to her enforcement efforts, the solitary individual presently dedicated to enforcement is effectively prohibited from making more than one complete circuit of the parking areas presently subject to enforcement. After continued observation and study, a minimum of two ~ -3- ; ~, e complete circuits (both chalking and a return pass for issuance of citations) is necessary for efficient enforcement of the parking restrictions. Since the demands placed on the enforcement officer to complete data entry responsibilities seems to be the factor directly limiting actual enforcement activities, it is the reccommendation of this task force that the resources available for enforcement of this program be increased to accommodate not less than the equivalent of the 1.5 persons. A sharing of the responsibility for data entry with another individual or staff person within the police department might also acc9mmodate this additional need. e Several miscellaneous cqnsiderations have also been identified during the ongoing development of the Downtown Parking Management Plan. The continued flow of communications freely between the task force and various city officials must be maintained. By working closely with both the chief of police and the community development director, the task force has been able to identify and concentrate efforts in areas requiring special consid- eration. Ongoing revisions to pavement marking and placement of signage in order to maximize use of available spaces has also benefited from these cooperative efforts. CONCLUSIONS: This task force maintains- and reiterates its opinion that the present downtown parking plan is an absolute success and benefit to the City of Stillwater. Members of the task force have continued to receive positive feedback and response from the merchants located within their respective areas. Many of these persons have also reported continuing approval of the plan from their patrons. Positive comments and remarks continue to be e -4- . ,', ' received by task force members with respect to the performance of the enforcement officer. e Review of certain fiscal considerations and information available earlier this year as they relate to the parking plan would seem to indicate that at the present time the parking management plan is self-sustaining. As with any system generating revenue on either a user-fee or a penalty system, , ongoing enforcement is necessary to achieve maximum efficiency and revenue potential. Enforcement shoul~ be in effect Mon.-Sat. & Permit Parking sho~ld read Mon.-Sat. also. Present permit signs read Mons.-Fri. From a practical standpQint, the Downtown Parking Management Plan has clearly achieved its goal of providing free, immediate, and easily accessible parking for the benefit of both the patrons and visitors to the Stillwater area. Respectfully submitted: e Down own Parking Management Task Force: ~-P (!~ Richard Chilson Mad'Capper Saloon and Eatery e David Mawhorter Chief of Police ~ ~D '3 Cooie t~ Fancy Nancy's Ir)'ilk ,J - Stillwater, MN .~JL Karl M. Ranum Ranum Law tI; aul "monet Simonet Furniture qJ~ David ,Swanson Stillwater Post Office -5-