HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-11-13 CC Packet
e
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
AGENDA
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
November 13, 1990
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director 4. Comm. Dev. Director 7. Fire Chief
2. Public Safety 5. Parks & Recreation 8. City Attorney
3. Public Works Dir. 6. Consulting Engineer 9. City Clerk
10. City Coordinator
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special & Regular Meetings - October 16, 1990
Special Meeting - October 23, 1990
e
INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS
1. Judith Gulden - Discussion of Task Force to Study Community Issues.
2. Jim McKinney - Concerns regarding the City Maintenance Facility on No.
Fifth Street.
e
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Zoning
Ordinance Text Amendment adding a new Public Administrative Office
District, PA, to the Zoning Ordinance Land Use Designations. Case No.
ZAT/90-5. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affected property owners.
2. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Zoning
Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning of three fourths acre of land
from residential duplex, RB, to CBD, Central Business District located
between the railroad and Main Street, north of Laurel Street. Case No.
ZAM/90-5, City of Stillwater, Applicant.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affected property owners.
3. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Zoning
Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning on residential areas
surrounding the Downtown from RCM Multi-Family Residential Medium Density
to RB Duplex Residential. Case No. ZAM/90-6, City of Stillwater,
Applicant.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affected property owners.
4. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Zoning
Ordinance Map Amendment designating certain zoned lands from an RCM
1
Multi-Family Residen ial designation to PA, Public Administrative Office.
Case No. ZAM/90-7, C'ty of Stillwater, Applicant.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affect d property owners.
5. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing to consider a Variance to ~
the Parking Ordinanc for a residential/commercial building at 220-224 .,.
East Chestnut Street in the CBD, Central Business District, Historic
Commercial District. Case No. V/DR/90-61, Shawn and Becky Otto,
Applicants.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affect d property owners.
6. This is the day and ime for the Public Hearing to consider a Special Use
Permit, parking, sig variance, and design review for the construction of
a train depot and pa king lot at 601 North Main Street in the RB, Two
Family Residential D'strict, Flood Plain, FP, Downtown Plan District. Case
No. SUP/V/DR/90-62. David Paradeau (Minnesota Zephyr), Applicant.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on October 25, 1990
and mailed to affect d property owners.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Request for Final Pl t approval for seven lot Oak Glen 9th Addition
located north of McK sick Rd. Ct. in the RA Single-Family Residential
Planned Unit Develop ent Dist., Perry Shortridge, Applicant.
2. Additional Informati n on Stillwater-Houlton Highway 36 Bridge Decision.
a. Section 106, His oric Resources Impact Review.
b. Visual Impact of Department of Interior Recommended Bridge Location.
3. Request for Grading ermit by Washington County for construction of
Parking Structure an Law Enforcement Center site., Washington Co.,
Applicant.
/4. Purchase & Dedicatio of land for Neighborhood Park located north of 61st
St. and southwest of extended Harriet Street.
e
5. Petition for Local I provement for a portion of Curvecrest Blvd. extending
approximately 300 ft west of Washington Ave.
6. Request from Curve C est Properties II to install Storm Sewer line in
Curve Crest Right-of Way and receive reimbursement for the costs.
7. Consideration of req est to accept previously paid Park Dedication Fees
for Subdivision with'n the Stillwater Industrial Park Subdivision Area.
8. Resolution describin City Assistance provided to Curve Crest Properties
II for construction f Office/Warehouse in Stillwater Business Pk.
consistent with the evelopment Dist. Tax Increment Financing Plan.
9. Development Agreemen providing for TIF Assistance between City of
Stillwater and Curve Crest Properties II.
10. Request for reapport onment of assessments for Curve Crest Properties II
Office/Industrial Bu lding.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request to Transfer itl e of Road for Greens Townhomes.
-
2. Feasibility Study on Adaptive Reuse of the Stillwater Jr. High School.
2
e
e
e
3. Final Acceptance of Work & Recommendation for Final payament for L.I. 251,
Forest Hills Addition.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS (continued)
CONSENT AGENDA
v/ 1. Resolution Directing Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8395).
2. Applications (list to be supplied at meeting)
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/FYI
1. Request for blacktopping of Hudson St.
2. U.S. Dept. of Interior - Regarding rules for Management of Lower St. Croix
Nat'l. Scenic Riverway.
3. Chamber of Commerce - Regarding Minnesota Chamber recommendations on Local
Goverment Aids.
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM NEWS MEDIA
ADJOURNMENT
3
e
e
e
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 16, 1990
4:30 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present:
Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor
Abrahamson.
Absent:
None
Also Present:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Comm. Dev. Director Russell
City Clerk Johnson
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Press:
Others:
Andy Merry, Jim Kellison.
1. Request by ConSpec for Tax Increment Financing Assistance for Completion
of 18,840 - 26,390 sq. ft. Manufacturing Facility in Stillwater Business
Park.
Discussion opened on the request by ConSpec Corporation for Tax Increment
Financing assistance for completion of an 18,840 sq. ft. first phase,
26,390 sq. ft. total light manufacturing facility in the Stillwater West
Business Park. Comm. Dev. Director Russell explained this was the
previously approved site of the Brine's project, it encourages local
business expansion, would help stabilize and strengthen the local property
tax base and create new jobs and is consistent with the recently adopted
Stillwater West Business Park plan. Further discussion involved the need
for City assistance and recommendations regarding Tax Increment Financing
procedures.
Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to adopt
the appropriate resolution approving the TIF assistance request for ConSpec
Corporation with the additional language for ownership transfer, directing
Staff to negotiate with the applicant regarding the payment terms, preparation
of an amendment to the Development District budget, and aevelopment agreement.
(Resolution No. 8383).
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson.
Nays - None
1
Stillwater City Council ~inutes
Special Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
2. Update on Negotiatio s for Purchase of Glacier Park/Mulberry Point
Property.
Comm. Dev. Director ussell presented an update regarding purchase of
Mulberry Point land rom the Railroad for expansion of Lowell Park and
purchase of other pr perties from the Railroad in the Downtown area.
Motion by Councilmember pheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to authorize
the appraisal for the ad itional railroad property and to hold a workshop at a
later date to discuss th's issue further. (All in favor).
3. Update on Purchase 0 Land for National Guard Armory Site.
Mr. Russell summan z ~d the actlOns of the Armory Commlttee and the
possible sites propo ed for the new Armory. Two sites are currently being
explored. An apprai al is needed in order to proceed.
Motion by Councilmember pheim, seconded by CouncilmemDer Kimble directing
Staff to obtain the nece sary appraisals on both sites currently being
explored for the new Arm ry. (All in favor).
Workshop Scheduled f r October 23, 1990 to Discuss Zephyr Site
Motion by CounCllmember phelm, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to schedule
a workshop for Tuesday a ternoon, October 23, 1990 at 4:30 P.M. to discuss the
Zephyr site. (All in fa or). e
RECESS
Motion by Councilmember imble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to recess
the meeting at 5:48 P.M. (All in favor).
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY C ERK
Resolutions:
No. 8383 - TIF Assistanc for ConSpec.
2
e
-.
e
REGULAR MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 16, 1990
7:00 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present:
Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor
Abrahamson.
Absent:
None
Press:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Consulting Engineer Moore
Comm. Dev. Director Russell
Planning Comm. Chair Fontaine
Public Safety Director Mawhorter
City Clerk Johnson
Julie Kink, St.Croix Valley Press
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Also Present:
Others:
Leonard Feeley, Sally Evert, Dennis Sullivan, Ricnard Kilty,
Harry Peterson, Terri Poutre, James McKinney, Babbette Regan,
John Rheinberger, Duane Arndt, Bob Anderson, Tim Stefan.
e
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to
approve the minutes of the Regular and Recessed Meetings of October 2, 1990 as
presented. (All in favor).
INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Ron Langness, Seringsted, Inc. - Possible Award of Bid - $1,350,000
General Obligatlon Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 1990A.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adopt
the appropriate resolution awarding the bid for the sale of the $1,350,000
General Obligation Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 1990 A to FBS Investment
Services, Inc. (Resolution No. 8382).
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson.
Nays - None
STAFF REPORTS
1. Public Safety Director - No Report.
2. Finance Director - No Report.
3. Community Development Director - No Report.
e 1
.'
Stillwater City Council inutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and for the Publ ic Hearing for a Variance request to
the sideyard setback equirements (12 ft. requested, 20 ft. required) for
the construction of a attached garage at 322 W. Churchill St. in the RB,
Two Family Residential Dist., Duane Arndt, applicant. Case No. V/90-60.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on October 11 and
mailed to affected pr perty owners.
Comm. Dev. Director R ssell explained the applicant is proposing a new two
stall, 686 sq. ft. ga age replacing an existing one stall garage. He
further stated there 's a problem with the requested setback in that cars
parked in front of th garage would overhang the sidewalk. The
recommendation is to lace the garage twenty feet minimum from the back of
the sidewalk to elimi ate the overhang of cars onto the sidewalk and
accommodate pedestria s. Mr. Fontaine stated the Planning Commission
unanimously denied th request because of the safety factor for
pedestrians. Mayor A rahamson closed the public hearing. Mr. Fontaine
added that the Planni g Commission would approve the request if the garage
, was set back twenty f et from the sidewalk. Further discussion followed
on thi s poi nt.
Motion by Councilmember B dlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to deny ~
the Variance request to t e sideyard setback requirements (12 ft. requested,
20 ft. required) for the onstruction of an attached garage at 322 W.
Churchill St. in the RB, wo Family Residential Dist., Duane Arndt, applicant.
Case No. V/90-60. (All i favor).
2. Tnis is the day and t me for the continuation of the Public Hearing to
consider a Subdivisio of an 8.7 acre lot into two lots of approximately
2.5 and 6.2 acres at he Northwest corner of Washington Avenue and Curve
Crest Boulevard in th IP-I, Industrial Park Industrial District, James E.
Kellison, Curve Crest Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUB/90-48.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on August 23, 1990
and mailed to affecte property owners.
Mr. Russell explained this request to subdivide an existing 8.7 acre lot
bounded by future Cur e Crest Blvd., Washington Ave. and Orleans St. into
two lots of 2.5 and 6 2 acres, which meets the lot size requirements. Mr.
Fontaine stated the Panning Commission approved the request.
Leonard Feeley, 183 C ttonwood Ct., asked for the location of the property
and this was explaine. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing.
Motion by Council member K mble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt
the appropriate resolutio approving a Subdivision of an 8.7 acre lot into two
2
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
lots of approximately 2.5 and 6.2 acres at the Northwest corner of Washington
Avenue and Curve Crest Boulevard in the IP-I, Industrial Park Industrial
District as conditioned, James E. Kellison, Curve Crest Properties, Applicant.
Case No. SUB/90-48. (Resolution No. 8384).
Ayes - Council members Bodl ovick, Farrell, Kimbl e, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson.
Nays - None
e
3. This is the day and time for the continuation of the Public Hearing to
consider a Special Use Permit for wholesale auto parts distribution for
use located on the northwest corner of Curve Crest Boulevard and
Washington Avenue in the Business Park Industrial District, Curve Crest
Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUP/90-50.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on August 23, 1990
and mailed to affected property owners.
Mr. Russell explained the applicant has requested withdrawal of this
request. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to honor the
applicant's request for withdrawal of a request for a Special Use Permit for
wholesale auto parts distribution for use located on the northwest corner of
Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue in the Business Park Industrial
District, Curve Crest Properties, Applicant. Case No. SUP/90-50. (All in
favor ).
4. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing for the possible transfer
of a liquor license for Cat Ballou's, 112 No. Main St., Richard J.
Anderson, applicant.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on October 11,
1990.
Bob Anderson, representing Richard Anderson, owner of the property,
explained that Jerry Sanford, current holder of the liquor license, has
been leasing the property. The lease expires this date, and they do not
intend to buy the property. Discussion followed on Mr. Anderson receiving
consent from Mr. Sanford for the transfer of the liquor license. Mayor
Abrahamson closed the publ ic heari ng.
Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve
the request for a liquor license transfer to Richard J. Anderson for Cat
Ballou's, 112 No. Main St., contingent on receiving approval from the current
holder of the license, J. Sanford. (All in favor).
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
e
3
Stillwater City Council M,'nutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
1. uet, Washington Co. Public Works De t. regarding
eans St. Intersectlon.
e requeste t lS ltem be delayed until later in the
quet from Washington County Public Works is present.
2. Feasibility Re art fo Fairmeadows Sewer Line.
Consu tlng Englneer More exp alne the Feasl ility Report for the
proposed Fairmeadows ewer Line which would include the construction of a
new force main on Fai meadows Rd. all the way to Olive St. The
televising of the sew r line revealed a root problem between Laurie Ln.
and Hanson Pl. on Fa; meadows Rd. Mr. Moore recommended the force main be
constructed with repa r of Fairmeadows Rd. and the proposed Lift Station
modifications be cons ructed at a total estimated cost of $98,740.
Discussion followed a to whether this could be assessed and establishment
of a sewer district.
Motion by Councilmember 0
the Feasibility Report fo
hearing for November 13,
* (See motion later in th
heim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
the Fairmeadows Sewer Line and order a
990. (All in favor).
meeting relating to this item).
to accept
public
(Continued:)
1. Report from Larry Bos uet, Washington Co. Public Works Dept. regarding ~
CSAH 2 hlr t. 0 eans St. Intersectlon.
Don Wlsnlewskl, Washl gton County Pub lC or s, was present to explain Mr.
Bosquet1s letter whic stated that traffic volume and the number of
accidents at this int rsection are not sufficient to warrant all-way stop
signs at this interse tion. He further stated the County will keep
monitoring the inters ction and work with the School District on this
issue.
3.
Motion by Council member B
the change of the locatio
Building, as conditioned,
71. (All in favor).
Council recessed for
1),
dlovick, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve
of the Parking Structure for the Government Office
Washington County, applicant, Case No. PUD/88-68 &
and reconvened at 8:12 P.M.
4
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
INDIVIDUALS AND DELEGATIONS (Continued)
2. Petition for Stop Signs on St. Croix & No. Second St.; and No. Second St.
and Sycamore St.
Terri Poutre was present to make this request on behalf of the petitioners.
They are requesting four way stop signs at St. Croix & No. Second Streets
and a single stop sign on Sycamore at No. Second St. Public Safety
Director Mawhorter explained the results of the survey they made of these
intersections and the conclusion that the signs are not warranted.
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to direct the
Traffic Engineer to review the request for four-way stop signs at North Second
and St. Croix Streets and a single stop sign at Sycamore and North Second St.
and evaluate it against the comprehensive sign map to see what might be the
best way to channel traffic through that neighborhood. (All in favor).
e
NEW BUSINESS
1. Appeal of Heritage Preservation Commission decision regarding Chain Link
Fence enclosing Lowell Inn Parking Lot.
John Rheinberger, representing Art Palmer of the Lowell Inn, presented Mr.
Palmer's appeal of the Commission's decision to deny a permanent chain
link fence to be constructed around the Lowell Inn parking lot, especially
the Second St. side of the lot. They stated this fence would have to be
temporary. Counci 1 discussed the meaning of the word "temporary", as used
here, and how soon the City will make improvements to their property
adjacent to this lot.
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick, to
approve the temporary status of the chain link fence for the Lowell Inn
Parking Lot as presented by Arthur Palmer, with permanent coordinated fencing
to be placed on the site wilen the City improves their parking lot. (All in
favor ).
2. Request for Material Substitution on 212 No. Main St., Wrap & Ship
Building, Case No. DP/PR/89-61.
Tim Stefan, Wrap & Ship, stated they wish to substitute a burnished block
instead of the stucco finish which was originally approved. Mr. Russell
stated this in keeping with the character of the building.
Moti on by Council member Bodl ovick, seconded by Council member K imbl e to approve
the request to replace the stucco material on the interior fire stair with
burnished block at Wrap & Ship, 212 No. Main St., Case No. DP/PR/89-61. (All
in favor).
3. Special request for City Approval to construct new Single Family Residence
on site with existing Single Family Residence at 1016 So. 6th St. in the
RB Duplex Residential Dist., Jay Cates, applicant.
e 5
Stillwater City Council inutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
Mr. Russell explaine that the applicant wishes to construct a house on a
lot that currently h $ an existing house and will tear it down after the
new house is constru ted. He suggested that the City draft an agreement
witn the applicant sating that the old house will be removed within a
certain time frame a ter the new house is built or the City will remove it
at owner's expense.
Motion by Councilmember imble, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve
the request to construct a new Single Family Residence on site with existing
Single Family Residence t 1016 So. 6th St. in the RB Duplex Residential
Dist., as conditioned, J y Cates, Applicant. (All in favor).
4.
Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson.
Ayes - Councilmembers Bo
Nays - None
Motion by Councilmember arrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to add Paul e
Simonet, Simonet's Furni ure, Linda Hinz, John's Bar, and Mike Mcguire, Brick
Alley & Dock Cafe, to th Downtown Plan Action Committee. (All in favor).
odlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to
a of October 16, 1990, including the following: (All
General Contractor
Renewal
Thomas S.Brownson Const., Inc. General Contractor
P.O. Box 281
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Renewal
McGough Construction Co. General Contractor
2737 No. Fairview Ave.
St. Paul, Mn. 55113
Renewal
6
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regul ar Meeti ng
October 16, 1990
Donald McLellan
14847 60th St. No., #11
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
General Contractor
New
Jack Rice Construction
8496 Lofton Ave. No.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
General Contractor
Re newa 1
Swanson Construction
2108 Dundee Place
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
General Contractor
Renewa 1
Thell Construction
1933 Sicard Ln.
Somerset, Wi 54025
General Contractor
New
e
3. Submission of Claim from Cathrine Penne for injuries from fall at entrance
to Mulberry Point Antiques, 270 No. Main St. to insurance company.
4. Set Public Hearing Date of November 13, 1990 for the following Planning
Cases:
a. Case No. ZAM/90-6 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning
on residential areas surrounding the Downtown from RCM Multi-Family
Residential Medium Density to RB Duplex Residential. City of
Stillwater, Applicant.
b. Case No. ZAT/90-5 - Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment adding a new Public
Administrative Office District, PA, to the Zoning Ordinance Land Use
Designations. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
c. Case No. ZAM/90-7 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment designating certain
zoned lands from a RCM Multi-Family Residential designation to PA,
Public Administrative Office. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
d. CASE NO. V/90-61 - Variance to the Parking Ordinance for a residential/
commercial building at 220-224 East Chestnut Street in the CBD, Central
Business District, Historic Commercial District. Shawn and Becky Otto,
Applicants.
e. CASE NO. SUP/V/DR/90-62 - Special Use Permit, parking, sign variance,
and design review for the construction of a train depot and parking lot
at 601 North Main Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District,
Flood Plain, FP, Downtown Plan District. David Paradeau (Minnesota
Zephyr), Applicant.
f. CASE NO. ZAM/90-5 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment changing the zoning
of three fourths acre of land from residential duplex, RB, to CBD,
Central Business District located between the railroad and Main Street,
north of Laurel Street. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
e
7
Stillwater City Council inutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
Water Problem at 4th
Councl lSCUSSlon
received from Orwin
Ave. and Burlington
had stated the culve
discussed at the las
would like to see so
Ave. & Burlington Street
owe regar lng a etter Councilmember Bodlovick
arter stating concerns for a water problem at 4th
t. It was noted that Public Works Director Junker
t has been cleaned out; and this item was not
Council fY1eeting two weeks ago. Council stated they
kind of routine maintenance in this area.
INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATION (Continued)
Contlnuatlon 0 Pu 1 c Hearing No.1, Request for Variance for
Constructlon 0 ara e, Duane Arn t, Appllcant.
r. Arn t arrlve la e an requeste the Council reopen the hearing so
that he may be heard Mr. Russell advised that the same request cannot be
heard for another ye r after it has been acted upon. He further advised
that Mr. Arndt can r apply with a different form of the variance such as
the 20 ft. setback.
STAFF REPORTS (Continued)
4. City Attorney -
Rousseau Case
Mr. Magnuson reporte that he had attended a meeting with representatives ~
of the DNR and the A torney General IS office regarding the Rousseau case .~
and an agreement has been reached. Discussion followed regarding the DNR
rules.
Fairmeadows Sewer Li e Problem
Mr. t~gnuson lnltlat urt er discussion of the Fairmeadows Sewer Line,
stating it would be he middle of December befot~e a new sewer line could
begin to be construc ed following the usual procedures, so he suggested
that it be declared IIfloodll emergency, findings regarding the emergency
be drafted and quote be taken as soon as possible to proceed with the
construction. Discu sion also included financing and the possibility of
creating a sewer ser ice district.
*Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to adopt
the appropriate resoluti n directing the City Attorney to draft findings
determining the existenc of an emergency for Fairmeadows Sewer Line because
of flood damage and dire ting the City Engineer to prepare plans and specs and
obtain quotes for doing he work, to be returnable by the October 23, 1990
Special Meeting; and tha the Resolution ordering the Improvement Hearing with
regard to this project i hereby rendered null and void because of this
emergency. (Resolution ~o. 8386)
Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson.
Ayes - Councilmembers
Nays - None
8
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
5. City Coordinator -
Addition of Members to Sold Waste Advisory Committee
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve
the addition of Janelle Borden and John Kroening to the Solid Waste Advisory
Committee. (All in favor).
e
Mr. Kriesel added that a report on volume based solid waste collection
will possibly be ready for the Council by the first meeting in November.
Liability Insurance for the Joint Cable Commission
Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to share
one-third of the costs of liability insurance for the Joint Cable Commission
with Oak Park Heights and Bayport. (All in favor).
City Attorney (Continued)
Sharing of Costs of Defense Counsel in Cable Comrn. Lawsuit
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to
approve sharing costs of defense counsel in the Cable Commission lawsuit with
Bayport, Oak Park Heights and the Joint Cable Commission for defense counsel
on a pro-rated basis per population, with the funds to be advanced by the
cities and reimbursed. (All in favor).
Publication of Charter Amendment in Stillwater Gazette
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilrnember Bodlovick to publish
the Notice of the Election as it relates to the Charter Amendment in the
S ti 11 wa ter Gazette. (All in favor).
6 . City C 1 e rk -
Waiver of Garbage & Refuse Charges
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to
approve the Waiver of tne Garbage & Rubbish Collection Charge for Case No.
18-130. (All in favor).
Banner for Trinity Lutheran Church Yulefest
Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve
the request to hang a banner at Main and MYrtle Streets, from Nov. 10 - 17,
and attach balloons to parking I~ter posts on Nov. 17 for the Trinity Lutheran
Church Yulefest. (All in favor).
7. Consulting Engineer -
Contract with Braun Engineering for Downtown Improvements
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve
the City entering into a contract with Braun Engineering and Testing, Inc. for
soil borings for the Downtown improvements. (All in favor).
e
9
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
e
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS
1. Wayne Wohlers, Park & Rec. Comm. Chair - Elks Christmas tree sales at Lily
La e Tennls Courts.
The request for use of Lily Lake tennis courts for Christmas tree sales
has been made of Cou cil for several years, but Council will refer the
Elks to the Commissi n before the Council considers the request in the
future.
2.
3. Judith Gulden - City.s possible acquisition of Washin ton School
Playground.
Motion by Councilmember pheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to send the
letter from Judith Gulde , relating to the City.s possible acquisition of the
Washington School playgr und, to the Park & Rec. Board and the Superintendent
of School s. (All in fav r). e
4. Dennis Balyeat - Tra
HRA.
~action was taken n this item.
8 Housing Program to Washin ton Co.
5. Chuck Hazama, Mayor f Rochester - Use of City Flag at 1991 League Mtg.
Counci concurred Wl h the request or use 0 the Clty Flag at the 991
League Meeting in Ro hester.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember odlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to
adjourn the meeting at 9 20 P.M. (All in favor).
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY C ERK
10
e
e
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
October 16, 1990
Resolutions:
No. 8381 - Directing Payment of Bills.
No. 8382 - Award of Bid for G.O. $1,350,000 Capital Improvement Bonds.
No. 8384 - Subdivision of N.W. Corner of Washington Ave. & Curve Crest Blvd.,
Curve Crest Properties.
No. 8385 - Modification of Res. No. 7997, Addition of Members to Downtown Plan
Action Committee.
No. 8386 - Draft Emergency Flood Findings & Receive Quotes for Fairmeadows
Sewer Construction.
11
e
e
e
~
~
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
October 23, 1990
4:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim,
and Mayor Abrahamson.
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Comm. Dev. Director Russell
Finance Director Deblon
Consulting Engineer Moore
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Julie Kink, The Courier
Others: David Paradeau, Tom Hay, Dave Johnson,
LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL LANDSCAPING PLAN
Council discussed a landscaping plan from Park Nursery for
screening the area between the parking lot and the sidewalk
at Lakeview Hospital. Hospital representatives and neighbors
are agreeable to the plan.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Kimble to approve the landscaping plan for the parking lot at
Lakeview Hospital. (All in favor)
DISCUSSION OF ZEPHYR PROJECT AND REVISED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Community Development Director Russell explained the
background of the project and issues involved. City Attorney
Magnuson explained the revised development agreement and the
suggested selling price for the property. Council discussed
the suggested price with Mr. Paradeau.
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution directing the Mayor
and City Clerk to sign the addendum to the Development Agreement
with the Minnesota Zephyr, amending the purchase price of the
property to $135,000 (Sec. 2.01), and amending the City's
deadline to finish the public parking facility to October 1, 1991
(Sec. 2.06). (Resolution No. 8387)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
DISCUSSION OF CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES
1
I
~
stillwater City Co ncil Minutes
Special Meeting
October 23, 1990
e
Council will discuss this item at the meeting on October 30,
1990.
G ASSESSMENT REAPPORTIONMENT FOR PARCELS ONE &
NER PROPERTY INDUSTRIAL PARK PIN 11159-2025
Motion by Councilm mber Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble
to adopt the ppropriate resolution approving Assessment
Reapportionment or Parcels One & Three (Torseth/Skinner
Property) Industrial Park, PIN #11159-2025 & PIN #11159-2030.
(Resolution No. 83 8)
Ayes - Councilmemb rs Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrah mson
Nays - None
EAW FOR STILLWATER WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION
Motion by Councilm mber Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble
to authorize staf to draft a letter to the MPCA stating that an
EIS not be requ'red for the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment
Facility expansion. (All in favor)
SET DATE
tit
S OF VOTES FOR CITY ELECTION
Motion by Counci member Kimble, seconded by Councilmember
Bodlovick to set t e date of November 8, 1990 at 4:30 p.m. for
canvass of votes f r City Election. (All in favor)
OAK GLEN DEVELOPME T
The City's Bo
to explain s
Development.
recently intia
was able to ob
The Oak Glen C
the lOB Bond T
to advance $
delinquent and
trustee would
Motion by
Bodlovick
agreement
meeting on
d Consultant, Tom Hay appeared before Council
veral changes in the status of the Oak Glen
program of lot sales at reduced prices was
ed by Dave Johnson, owner of Oak Glen, and he
ain 84 signed purchase agreements as a result.
mpany is requesting an amended agreement with
ustee and the City. The City would be required
70,000 to the bond trustee for payment of
current taxes of the Golf Course, and the bond
e required to waive lot sales release fees.
Counc'lmember Opheim, seconded
to giv preliminary approval to an
with 0 k Glen Development, to be
October 30, 1990. (All in favor)
by Councilmember
amendment to the
finalized at the
e
2
e
e
e
.
,
stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
October 23, 1990
APPROVAL OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. L.I. 270. FAIRMEADOWS
SEWER LINE
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Kimble to adopt the appropriate resolution approving the plans
and specifications for the Fairmeadows Sewer Project as
presented. (Resolution No. 8389)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
LETTER TO LEGISLATORS
Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell
to approve two letters for the Mayor's signature, in regard to a
new Stillwater bridge, to be sent to our Congressmen. (All in
favor)
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember
Farrell to adjourn the meeting at 6:25 p.m. (All in favor)
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
No. 8387 - Approving addendum to agreement with Minnesota Zephyr
No. 8388 - Approving Assessment Reapportionment for Torseth/Skinner
Property
No. 8389 - Approving Plans & Specs for Fairmeadows Sewer. Line.
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretary
,
November 3, 1990
~ Dear Mayor Abrahamson and City Council Members Ann Bodlovick, Tom
Farrell, Jay Kimble, and Roberta Opheim,
We are writing to you to request council action in regard to the
city's maintenance facility located behind city hall and surrounded
by a number of long-established city homes. We ask in regard to the
facility that you address both a potential long-range problem and
an actual, immediate problem.
First, the long-range problem. We understand the city has future
plans to expand the maintenance facility in order to consolidate
its equipment there. While the need for expanded facilities and
consolidation is understandable, we do not think that a city the
size of Stillwater, with the amount of equipment it requires,
should establish such a facility in the middle of a peaceful
residential neighborhood of well-kept homes, and we vigorously
protest carrying out such a plan. A site in a nonresidential area
is much more appropriate for the industrial function of city
business. We ask that the city work toward procuring such a site if
and when it decides to expand the maintenance facilty.
e
Second, the immediate problem. In the past, the facility was kept
from view, surrounded by trees and shrubbery on three sides and
sitting back from view on the south by a long drive out to Myrtle
Street. Recently a new access was made out onto quiet Mulberry
Street. Trees and shrubbery which previously served to hide the
garage from sight were removed. The large, gaping hole which
resulted exposes to view a very unkempt and unattractive junk yard
of tin buildings, old cars and trucks, and piles of debris and
other materials lying about on the ground. We ask that the junk
yard be cleaned up immediately and that shrubs and trees be planted
to restore the isolation once the resurfacing of Mulberry Street is
completed. We know that there had been some discussion of opening a
second entry to the city facility that would open onto Mulberry,
but it is our understanding that this plan was rejected, and we
sincerely hope that this option will not be reconsidered.
We also ask the city to restrict all activity at the facility
outside the hours of 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, with
the exception of emergency vehicles and snow plows. The street
sweepers, usually active between 2 a.m. and 5 a.m., and the
dumpster exchange at around 5:30 a.m. two or more times per week,
are unnecessarily disturbing the early-morning peace of the
neighborhood.
While we accept the city facility as a de facto neighbor, we do not
wish it to expand its area and intrude further on the neighborhood,
nor do we want it to be a messy or noisy neighbor as it presently
exists. We ask the city to be a good citizen, respecting the rights
and the peace of its neighbors.
e
Thank you for your consideration.
NAME
j &
e
PHONE
ADDRESS
Sf 3f'- 6f17?
U -4527
I/o t JJ/n.Jbf-yY Jj~1~j;;d1
30 ~;( #J
'i z. tf aJ, jJJ/I t.B EfiPl/ 57: if 3 9-i!-z'IF
e
Lf ~tj tufa
;{ 6l~ LJ4. - '.c2.. 4-.3-
t
~~~ 1
t
PHONE
ADDRESS
(31-6' ?-z!5
4J-9/g2?~
NAME
/'~t4J1JJJu,{l./'iff r/IO JJJ ~ }T.
H4:. $& tV.~C6' Ji<
e
I 1/.
l\S---0. ~n~
I [Q f-J ~w',a
L{~--o3C.G
~~_ObL\-c)
~q_ ()(Plf:O
e
~O..,(~ ~ d....
e
ADDRESS PHONE
f!J C( - <{gO ....
,f~q -cfr
Jf-!:.J.-./ YID ^l31~7/ 3/
1.{i6 cJ ~u\6 Lf)'1-)/3/
Jctif; ,-Vi if J r-Of &:r
1'/ tv /..j,;;c-21 ~J<)<. C(S;2- - )..33.5 e
f:-eJ-tVb
? 1- ( ~6 I>-
~I)...~q,. '3
e
e
e
, ~-
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
Date:
October 8, 1990
Time:
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Gerald Fontaine, Chairman
Angela Anderson, Judy Curtis, Duane Elliott,
Warren Pakulski
Steve Russell, Co~m. Dev. Director
Members Absent: Glenna Bealka, Rob Hamlin, Jay Kimble,
Don Valsvik
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Warren Pakulski, to approve
the minutes of September 17, 1990 as submitted. All in favor.
RCM ZONING AMENDMENTS
1. RCM, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential District -
study results and zoning amendment recommendations.
Assistant City Planner, Ann pung-Terwedo, gave a presentation on
the recent land use study in the RCM district and the Zoning
amendments recommended as a result of that study. The study found
that the majority of the homes in the district are currently
single family homes built before 1900. Many of the structures
require rehabilitation. Staff recommends that the district be
rezoned to RB, Duplex Residential, and a new zoning designation,
PA, Public Administrative Office. The rezoning would be more
restrictive, and would set the density at lower levels to
maintain the character of those districts.
Chairman Fontaine asked for comments from the audience. Richard
Kilty questioned why lot 37 (st. Mary's Church block) would be
rezoned PA instead of RB. The Commission determined that this lot
should be rezoned RB.
There were also questions from owners
residences regarding how the rezoning
property. The property owners were informed
would be "grand fathered in" and that the
affect their property unless it was sold.
of multiple family
would affect their
that their residences
rezoning would not
The Commission also discussed whether to include retail
the new PA district and determined that retail should
included.
use in
not be
A. Case No.
changing the
ZAM/90-6 - Zoning Ordinance
zoning on residential areas
Map Amendment
surrounding the
, ~'
stillwater Planning ommission Minutes
October 8, 1990
Downtown from Rl.t1 Nulti-Family Re5idential Medi1.ufl Dene.ity to
RB Duplex Reside tial. City of Stillwater, Applicant.
Motion by Judy C rtis, seconded by Warren Pakulski to approve
the zoning ordin nce Map Amendment. Motion carried 5-0.
B.
adding a new Pub
the zoning Or
Stillwater, Appl
o-s - zoning Ordinance Text Amendment
ic Administrative Office District, PA, to
inance Land Use Designations. City of
cant.
Motion by Warr n Pakulski, seconded by Angela Anderson to
approve the Z ning Ordinance Text Amendment with the
elimination of r tail use. Motion carried 5-0.
C. Cape No. ZA
designating cer
Residential desi
City of Stillwat
0-7 - zoning Ordinance Map Amendment
ain zoned lands from a RCM Multi-Family
nation to PA, Public Administrative Office.
r Applicant.
Motion by Judy clrtis, seconded by Warren pakulski to approve
the Zoning Ordin nce Map Amendment. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. V/90-60-
(twelve feet req
construction of an
in the RB, Two Famil
Duane Arndt, proper
existing garage
house. The home
garage will be
spruce trees on
new garage.
to the sideyard setback requirements
twenty feet required) for the
ttached garage at 322 West Churchill Street
Residential District.
y owner, presented the request to remove the
attach a two-car garage to the rear of the
pproximately 135 years old, and the proposed
itecturally correct. Because of two large
property, this is the only location for the
The Commission fel that putting the garage at this
would cause a problem because any cars parked in the
would extend out i to the sidewalk. It was felt that,
safety standpoint, it would be preferable to remove the
trees and build the garage farther back.
location
driveway
from a
spruce
Motion by Judy Curtis, seconded by Angela Anderson to deny the
Variance request as proposed. Motion carried 5-0.
Case No. V/90-61 - Variance
residential/commercial building
in the CBD, Central Business
District.
to the Parking Ordinance for a
at 220-224 East Chestnut street
District, Historic Commercial
Shawn otto presente the application. He is proposing to restore
2
..-- ,
e
e
e
e
e
e
- ..~
~
~
stillwater Planning Commission Minutes
October 8, 1990
the building at 220-224 East Chestnut street for first floor
commercial/office space and second floor residential or office.
The parking requirement is 13 for the commercial and residential
use, and would be 16 if the second floor is used as office
space. There is no on-site parking, and Mr. otto feels it will be
difficult to rent the space as a residence without on-site
parking.
There are four recommended conditions of approval which the
applicant agrees to.
Motion by Duane Elliott, seconded by Warren Pakulski to approve
the variance request with four conditions. Motion carried 5-0.
Case No. SUP/V/DR/90-62 - Special Use Permit, parking, sign
variance, and design review for the construction of a train depot
and parking lot at 601 North Main Street in the RB, Two Family
Residential District, Flood Plain, FP, Downtown Plan District.
David Paradeau, owner of the Minnesota Zephyr, presented the
application along with his general manager and general contractor
for the proposed site. The project is also awaiting approval from
MNDot and Burlington Northern.
There was discussion of the eight recommended conditions of
approval. Condition No. 4 was amended to require a revised
landscape plan if the current plan is not approved by MNDot. The
Commission also suggested that more natural landscaping be used.
Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Angela Anderson to approv~
the Special Use Permit with eight conditions as modified. Motion
carried 4-1 (Judy Curtis opposed).
Case No. ZAM/90-5 - Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment changing the
zoning of three fourths acre of land from residential duplex, RB,
to CBD, Central Business District located between the railroad
and Main Street, north of Laurel Street. City of Stillwater,
Applicant.
Motion by Warren Pakulski, seconded by Duane Elliott to appprove
the zoning amendment. Motin carried 5-0.
OTHER
Case No. DR/90-7 - Design review for the placement of a temporary
fence at 102 North Second Street in the CBD, Central Business
District, Historic Commercial District. No action was taken.
Chairman Fontaine asked that Planning Commission members call him
or Steve Russell any time they are unable to attend a meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
1
...
e
e
e
RCM, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
PROPOSED ZONING
LAND USE SURVEY
AND
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Background:
The Stillwater Downtown Plan (an amendment to the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan)
identifies land use changes to residential neighborhoods surrounding Downtown
Stillwater. These recommendations were based on a reconnaissance survey and
analysis conducted during the summer of 1989; they will be discussed later in
this report. In June 1989, residents of the Chestnut Street Hill submitted a
petition to change the zoning from the existing RCM, Multiple Family Residential
District, fifteen units per acre to RB, Duplex, eight units per acre in that
specific neighborhood. This request for a zoning change was due to a an increase
in commercial activity in the area, parking problems created by inadequate on-
site parking for multi-unit residential structures and the concern about the
renovation of the large historic homes into multiple family dwellings. In order
to adequately identify existing land use in the residential neighborhoods
surrounding downtown and the Chestnut Street area, a detailed land use survey
was necessary. These areas include the whole RCM, Multiple Family Residential
Districts as shown on Map 1.
In June of 1990, a Land Use Survey was conducted of the whole RCM, Medium Density
Residential District. An overview of this study is included.
The attached overview gives an outline of the proposed zoning in relationship
to the existing land uses in these areas. Two district maps are included showing
this. A map of the overall area is then included to show the relationship
between the two areas and downtown Stillwater.
Recommendations:
Approve the Zoning Amendments as included.
1
..
PROPOS
ZONING IN RELATIONSHIP TO LAND USE
After careful analysis 0 the existing conditions of the RCM, Medium Density
Residential District, it was concluded that zoning amendments were needed in
order to preserve the existing land uses in these areas. The following is the
zoning areas broken down etween the North and South Hill.
e
South Hill
PA - Public Administrati e Office District.
The purposed PA zoning i the existing south RCM district includes the Junior
High School, the Historic County Courthouse"and st. Michael's Church and School.
These uses more closely atch Public Administrative Office Zoning. The zoning
amendment text is as out ined on the next page (ZATj90-5).
RCM - Medium Densit
Residential District.
Of the thirteen structur s along Third Street, there are currently two-single
family dwellings. The seep slopes behind these properties to the west act as
a boundary between less dense housing up-the-hill. Third Street is more
conducive to higher dens ty housing.
RB - Two-Famil Resident al District.
The remaining area west f Third Street and south of Myrtle Street is proposed
to be RB, Two-Family Res" dential. This zoning is more compatible to the single- e
family and duplex uses w ich make up 81 percent of the remaining structures.
*Refer to attached South
Existing Land Use and Proposed Zoning Map.
RB - Two-Famil Resident"al District
The proposed RB Zoning D'strict consists of nine (9) city blocks from Mulberry
Street to Laurel Street. This area is currently comprised of 7,490 Single-Family
dwellings.
*Refer to attached Nort RCM District Existing Zoning Land Use and Proposed
Zoning Map.
North Hill
PA - Public Administrat"ve Office District
The proposed PA, Public Administrative Office District zoning in the existing
north RCM district inclu es the area between Myrtle and Mulberry and Third Street
to Fifth Streets. This rea includes City Hall, the library, two churches, the
City water department a d the post office. Although this area contains five
single-family dwellings and three multiple-family dwellings, the largest amount
of area is occupied by ses that more closely match the Public Administrative
Zoning outlined on the endment (ZAT/90-5) on the next page.
2
e
e
e
e
~~
,-~"'''''(-
1:4
...
The Warm World parking lot and the Post Office which are in the existing CBD,
Central Business District are also more closely related to the PA, Public
Administrative Office District. These sites are included in the overall proposed
zoning map.
*Refer to attached north RCM district existing land use and proposed zoning map.
3
l\\\i/ rlily.\ r-./
l\\\f /iy.x
~~ ~.
~% 0.
./v /'
v ./ -n
/V' 7~
v ./ g:
~V~
~V
NORTH RCM DISTRICT EXISTING
LAND USE AND ZONING
. .. ~ . .. .. .. ..
~/':%
~\\~
:: ~~\b~r\\\~~ ~ :.:.: :.:.:::::::: :.:~
: : : : .. ~ \\ \~\ ~ . . '. '. '. ". '. '. '. . . .. %
. : ". '.:.:. ... ... ~ :. ~'.~~'.'. '. ". :. :.:c+
.. ... .. .. .. .. l..:J. .... .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
... : : : : : : : . : ._ v ~,.. ~'. : : : :
. . . . . . . . . . . V /_'..' ....: .' ". :. '.'
............ .... .... ~.
t:0 ~l~CO :::~/ /'
//// 30~'// 7
/ / /v::: >>V./,// /
V /' V,/ X'x'V J/./
Cherry Str eet
~~/N\AX '1,\ V "{y. Xl // v / /~
~~~/I / ,v'" v ./ ./ ,v ---;;;r /~ ,/
~\ / // ~ M x~. ~ V~/V0-::
/ / J// ~ ...- lAXX ~./ '/
J/' ./ ~ ~,/ 'v ~ ~ ~\\\\\~/ V
...- ../ v ./. ~ 'iX 7-/~"-
/VV.MrM ,/ .J~'YYv 1/ /../~
Linden '. ~ Street
./ .........::::::::
IV' ........-{
/ :::'.:::: =::
/........""S
: ; : ; :: : : 0..
" .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
North RCM .....
Existinq land use
t2 Sing le Family
~ Dupl ex
~ Mult iple Family
[ill
.... lnst itutional
0 vaca nt/parking
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. ....
. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.... .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .... ........ ..
~
_ ,.......~;..J,
e
~\\\~V ,/
././ /
,/ /1--- /
\\\~t/-/
~~ir~
e
~tree1.
1%:; v
'X-X X~ '\
Y II
//
v/
/~
.-J
----
-
~
\\\\\\~ /
e
Proposed Zoning
RB Two-Family Residential District
'PA Public Administrative Office
District
e
, .
',' .,.{.~.
.: ".:,'~'
e
e
SOUTH RCM DISTRICT EXISTING
LAND USE AND ZONING
.South RCM
Ex i s U n gJ,~!l.cL~Y2.~
0 vacanti Parking
ELl Si ngl e Family
~ DU!Jlex
W1 Mu It i r.> 1 e Fami ly
am Commercial
[J Instituti ona 1
....
....
Proposed .Zoning~. ~.',
RB Two - Fam jJ.y-~ ' ,
Residential District.
PA Public Administratlv
Off.ice Dist,rict,
. .. .
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORQINANCE ADDING PA-
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
ZONING DISTRICT
e
1. Purpose: To provide a district for public, semi-public uses and
offi ces.
2. Principal permitt d buildings and uses. In the Public
Administrative Office District, the following buildings and uses and
their accessory buildings and uses are permitted.
a. Administra ive office
b. Medical of ices
c. Group Day Care
d. Schools - ublic and private, business and technical and studios
for arts, crafts, photography, music and dance.
e. Public use; library, post office
f. Churches a d other places of worship
3. Permitted uses on special permits: In the Public and Administrative
Office Distrlct, he following bUlldings and uses and their accessory
buildings and use may be permitted by Special Use Permit.
a. Single Family, Duplex and Multi-family residential uses subject
to RCM reg lations.
b. Hospitals, convalescent hospitals and nursing homes. 4It
f
4. Use Determination
Any other use or ervice establishment determined by the City Council
to be of the same general character as the foregoing uses and which
will not impair t e present or potential use of adjacent properties may
be permitted. A S ecial Use Permit shall be required.
5. General Regulatio s
a. Height of - maximum:
Pri nci pa 1 use 2 stories 35 feet
Accessory 1 story 20 feet
REQUIREMENT
b. Minimum 10 area 10,000 square feet
c. Setbacks -
Front 30 feet
Rear 25 feet
Side 20 feet
Corner Sid 20 feet
d. Additional Requirements:
All parkin areas for three or more cars next to residential
zoned land shall be set back a minimum of ten feet and 4It
landscaped to screen the lot from the residentially zoned land.
e
e
e
The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, does
ordain:
1. Chapter 31.01. Subdivision 21 entitled PA-Public Administrative Office is
rescinded and is hereafter enacted to hereafter read as follows:
Subdivision 21 entitled PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE.
Adopted by Council this
day of
, 1990.
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk
Publish:
f"
~
\ ~"",q~:,~",.~...
Vl tcr'.:.";"'" ,.-.', ..
\ ,<>.. .." '
,~. \\
-: \ 'PROPOSEO'REl~l:I1NG ~
~ \ fOR 1l\E E~lS1I~G
\ RC~\ lONlNG 015 lC1S
\ "" /
\ /:/
\ '
, \/,.
:.A
\
\
\
,)
L
,
,
"" -
,
"
~
....
....
~
e
e
e
""~
LAND USE STUDY
AND
EVALUATION
The following is an overview of the study conducted in June of 1990 which
provided the direction for the rezoning amendments. An outline of the land use
recommendations out of the Downtown Plan is then discussed.
Survey Design:
Land Use Survey Methodology. A land use survey was conducted of the South Hill
RCM Residential District and the north RCM Residential District. The land use
survey was conducted by physically walki':l1g the area, reviewing water bill
addresses, reviewing the Stillwater City Directory along with information
provided by the Washington County Assessors Office. This gave an accurate
account of housing units in these areas, construction dates of the structures
and physical condition. From this survey, maps were drafted depicting the
information gathered. Also, specific information was obtained from Washington
County which gives the existing conditions of the housing stock in Stillwater.
Condition of Structure Methodology
A field survey was undertaken in June 1990 to evaluate the physical condition
of each structure in the RCM, Multiple Family Residential Districts surrounding
Downtown Stillwater. Structures were evaluated as to the structural condition
then were rated as good, normal, fair, poor according to the following criteria:
Good Condition:
No defects.
No major repairs.
Normal Condition
No defects or only slight defects which normally are corrected during the course
of regular maintenance.
Lack of paint.
Slight damage to porch or steps.
Slight wearing away of mortar between bricks or masonry.
Small cracks in walls, plaster or chimney.
Cracked windows.
Slight wear on floors, doorsills, door frames, window sills or window
frames.
Broken gutters or downspouts.
Fair Conditions
Holes, open cracks, rotted, loose or missing materials over a small area
of the foundation, walls, roof.
Shaky or unsafe porch, steps or railings.
Some rotted or loose window frames or sashes that are no longer rainproof
4
or windproof.
Broken or loose sta"r treads or broken loose or missing risers, balusters
or railings of outside stairs.
Deep wear on doorsills, doorframes, outside steps or floors.
Missing bricks or racks in the chimney which are not serious enough to
be a fire hazard.
Makeshift chimney
directly from the
or window.
Poor Conditions
uch as a stovepipe or other un insulated pipe leading
tove to the outside through a hole in the roof, wall
Endangers the health, safety and well beinqofoccupants. One or more critical
defects or combination 0 intermediate defects in sufficient number or extent
to require considerable repair or rebuilding; or is of inadequate original
construction. Critical d fects result from continued neglect or lack of repair
or indicate serious dama e to the structure. Examples of critical defects are:
Holes, open cracks r rotted, loose or missing material clapboard siding,
shingles, bricks, c ncrete, tile, plaster or floorboards) over a large area
of the foundation, outside walls, roof or chimney.
Substantial saggin of floors, walls or roof.
Extensive damage b storm, fire or flood.
5
e
e
e
e
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Description of Area: The RCM, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential
District is broken into two areas as outlined on Map 1. The RCM Districts are
shown in two separate areas due to the extended influence of CBD, central
Business District and the geography of the area. The bluffs and ravines provide
a natural boundary district along Myrtle street. Each area is bounded by the
North, South or West Hill surrounding Downtown Stillwater. These areas have the
oldest housing units in the City as well as historic public buildings. In fact,
the approximate boundaries of the RCM Districts are the Original Town of
Stillwater platted in 1843. The setting of the bluffs of the st. Croix River
and Architectural integrity of the homes makes this a unique setting.
Streets: The street system in these areas consist of local and collector
streets. Myrtle street, Fourth street on the North Hill and Third Street and
Pine on the South Hill are considered collector streets which take traffic
throughout Stillwater and provide access to state Highway 5, 36 and County Road
12. The local streets in these areas are used by residents of the community.
It was observed during the survey that Linden Street, Second Street and Broadway
have higher traffic volumes than other local streets in the area. Many of these
local streets on the North and South Hills are much narrower than the sixty foot
roadway standard. This is due to the age of the area.
South RCM District
~ Land Use: Refer to Map 2.
Housing: The South RCM, Multiple Family Residential District has 145 housing
structures and 264 housing units. Approximately 66% of the total housing
structures are Single Family Residential. Twenty of the total structures are
duplexes and the remaining 19% or 28 structures are at a higher density. Third
Street has the highest density housing. The remaining units are scattered
throughout the area.
HOUSING UNITS
NO. OF HOUSING STRUCTURES
Single Family
Duplex
Three Units
Four Units
Five Units
Six Units
Eight+ Units
97
20
12
8
2
2
4
Total
145
e
There was a trend in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s to convert these large homes into
multiple family dwellings. In the past ten years, this trend has reversed
itself. Restoration of these homes into Single Family or Duplex Residential uses
has been a continuing effort.
6
e
~.""
e
e
~
n
.....,;
~ It...
:rf '-\."-'
~'f~:Z . ~ ~.
~"'~~ ~~ ;
\~~ . ~~::"\ ,
~~)\~~1z1\ ~/J1\.~
{jffi "'\ {j!u!lj}~' OX" ..
fHJ'I- 'j:.\ ..['/-....7:>0\ I \ \<..~ .J- ' 0
_ 'fi it/. "'''- ~ "~,, vacan t/ Pa rk i I1g
T ~ J'i~ 'V./lP' .-<<\<1' (\~~ " ~ . t2 Single FamilY
n-':J>" ,~~ ~ ~ \ ~
. '-::f,... ,<n" ~l . .\~ m\'J
'b .~ 1'''' ~." .. .:..:.::~ IllilI Duplex
~ I/,I -1~~ ' . .... . '. . . '. . . . li\7iiQ
~ ':f / P Ii .... .:.' .....::.: fJi\M Multi~le Family
~<} ~\)~'I- ,,'\.fee'\. ::::::: . ....:....: <.:\.:.':: ::"~.<':'.>.~ r:m1I COnJmerci a 1
............ ~ !mI
~l ...:~<;,\ ..-f\ ,",'",:,":., .............
i.. '6 '.'.: :::::-:- 0" .' '~ r:::1
~ \ ~ ~ '" : .::. ..: ~ ':: ':'. : '.:-:':':::. '.: ......> :....:. ...: . ~ db Insti tuti ona 1
:.' ~ ..' .' '...-, ~'-;.,.~ .... IV
~ee~' .... IV ~~ .....'f. ~
s~i".A\ .... . '. .' '. . . IV ~ ~
[/'L V' ~ . ""<1' '.:' ............ '.:- .<" 'PJ" I ,. '-'''''' ;;;. ~ "-
~~::f ~~~ ' dY~ A%~:............: '.:.:.: ~.- ~~,~'t~ ".~
~ <w.v>~ """~ ~ ~ X kti. <" . .. .. .,/
\V ~~~ (' .' .... ..' .... ~y
Y> ". ";. ~iljlf. k~ "'" 1> .:.'. . . .::..::. .: ::.:. tf7
\ f/; < ";. /" .' .' . .
..-(;1 . . 'P' ~ \l; - fee", . ... ':':.
II '
Ilj1~7
)/ /
South RCM
Existing land use
,."...
i\
~..
o.
j'
-< "'\
it~
.' .:: -.:.:..
.:....:::... .......-<<\
~:"""'L' ~~.
- - ,\..~" (\
, , .
, \
.,...... .....: ~ .<\
.... .
\ .., " ,
~' 'C. ". .... ... .~.:.,. ,
~
e
e
e
, ~l:'
,l"'-
Parks: There are no dedicated city parks in this area.
Commercial Uses and Public Administration:
The district has three churches, two schools, two Bed and Breakfasts and six
offices. The majority of these office uses are located along Third and Myrtle
streets. There are no general retail uses in the area.
Age of structure:
The average age of the structures in the South RCM, Multiple Family Residential
District is 112 years. Approximately 36 percent or 43 of the total structures
which the age of the was identified were built between 1870 and 1879. Seventy-
two structures or 63 percent of the structures were built before 1900. Nineteen
structures were constructed after the turn-of-the-century and only eight
structures were constructed after World War II.
Year
No. of structures
Identified
Percent of
Total
1850 - 1859
1860 - 1869
1870 - 1879
1880 - 1889
1890 - 1899
1900 - 1919
1920 - 1939
1940 - 1959
1960 - 1979
1980 - Present
2
12
43
32
9
9
2
5
3
o
117
1%
10%
36%
27%
7%
7%
1%
4%
2%
North RCM District:
Land Use: Refer to Map 3.
Housing: The North RCM, Multiple Family Residential District has 72 housing
structures and 122 dwelling units. Approximately 75 percent of the total housing
structures are Single Family Residential. Twelve percent of the total are duplex
and the remaining 13 percent of the structures are a higher density. Linden
Nursing Home has 75 residents. This was not included in this housing survey.
As stated in the South RCM District section, there has been a trend in recent
years to convert multiple family homes into single family homes.
7
MAP 3
--
~~~ XqJ
\~\0\/"//'" ~
~\~ / Y'l:x
~\\ / /'\ t;
::;0//
~~/ /v 7-
'~ ,/' ~/ V
~V//
% TATVl
'{~~XY
/ 'Jv IXY)
//L-- /"
VV:::V/
l./'"' /
Cherry Str eet
~~ fO u' y\ /,YH XJ: V/"/ ~7'J
l\~~/f7 / :Z./ X V~V z // /~
1\\ V / '; ? W" ~ /;/ /~
;7 / ~ V <; / 'q-Yfx'/0, <; ~\\\\~/ /'
/ /iA;;" .--/ ~W&t\ / / /~ V
./ V )X~:1J.t /' \/^NWVv\ V/'/" /'
Linden : St reet
?/ // ~ /V/ ~ ~ ~.: ~ ~ ~ ~:;1 -\\\\\\\1/ /
V //;+ /::::: :::~. // /"
0~ ~j~~ ~~~
Mulberry Street
:. ,:. :. :. :.:. ~1 \' ~\' ~(O :::::::',",:::::: ~ IXy
\ '\, '. '. '. '.': .' . . . . . . . ~ ", f',
.......(0 IftX
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
........... \ ~ ~ V' V
\0" ...................... .. .. ^ It
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
............ //
. . . . " . . . . . . .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .... ... ..
:::. '.' '.':'.:. .' '.:~ ~."..:. :.':'. ~ ~ / /
. . . . . . . ~ --". . . . . . /7
. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ..
.. .. .. .. .. .... ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ,.. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .0...
~
.. .. ... .. .. .. .. ..
North ReM
Existing land use
Cd Single Family
~ Duplex
~ Multiple Family
f::} Institutional
o vacant/parking
.. .. . .. .. " .... .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
----
.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .... ..........
V
..\\\\\\\ ./
":.."
e
e
e
e
e
e
~
.."
HOUSING UNITS
HOUSING DESIGNATION
NO. OF HOUSING STRUCTURES
Single Family
Duplex
Three Units
Four Units
Five Units
Six Units
Eight+ Units
54
9
3
3
1
1
1
Total
72
Commercial Uses and Public Administration: The district has two churches, a
Public Library, City Hall, a Nursing Home and the City Water Department. There
are no general retail or offices in this area.
Parks: There are no dedicated parks in this area.
Ages of Structures: The average age of the structures in the North RCM, Multiple
Family Residential District is 103 years old.
Approximately 24 percent or 11 homes of the total structures identified were
built between 1870 - 1879. Twenty-nine structures or 64 percent were built
before 1900. Sixteen structures were built before the turn-of-the-century. Five
were built in the past 30 years.
No. of Structures Percent of
Year Identified Total
-
1850 - 1859 2 4%
1860 - 1869 5 11%
1870 - 1879 11 24%
1880 - 1889 9 20%
1890 - 1899 2 4%
1900 - 1919 6 13%
1920 - 1939 3 6%
1940 - 1959 2 4%
1960 - 1979 4 8%
1980 - Present 1 2%
45
8
NDITION OF HOUSING STRUCTURES
The 145 housing structu es in the South RCM, Medium Density Multiple Family
Residential District. Se enty-eight percent of these structures are in good or
normal condition. Nlnet en percent or 31 units are in fair to poor condition.
The standards set for his determination is reviewed in the condition of
structure methodology on Page 2.
e
SOUTH RCM DISTRICT
Condition
Good
Normal
Fair
Poor
No. of Structures
64
50
27
4
Percent of Total
44%
34%
18%
2%
Total Units: 145
Refer to Map 4.
Considering the average age of construction of these housing units in this
district at 1878, the ma ority of homes are in good condition. The restoration
and rehabili tat ion tren is continuing in Stillwater. Due to the unique
character and age of th area, property owners have taken pride in restoring
their homes.
There are 72 housing st
District. A surprisin
condition - approximatel
56 percent of the struct
ctures in the North RCM, Multiple Family Residential
amount of housing structures are in fair to poor
32 structures or 44 percent of the buildings. However,
res are in normal condition to good condition.
e
NORTH RCM DISTRICT
Condition
Good
Normal
Fair
Poor
No. of Structures
26
15
28
5
Percent of Total
36%
20%
38%
6%
Refer to Map 5.
There is no general are or specific neighborhood where the condition of these
structures are in fair to poor condition. It may be that these homes are
occupied by elderly pe le who cannot afford to repair their homes or these
homes are rental proper ies. Further study should be conducted in order to
determine if there is a need for financial assistance to rehabilitate homes in
poor condition.
e
9
. ',:'
t' " .
r
. .'.,". .
. .' ~ ;.
.........
. .
',' ,.
<:::T
0..
c:r: South RCt1
:E:
Condition of Structure
EJ Good
~ No rma 1
~ Fair
riM Poor
e
North RC
Conditio
Ed Goo
~ Nor
~ Fal
E Poo
. "t~P, ~
. .
- ~ ~ ~ ~ c:---- ~ ~ ~I" f ~ ~ ~
~
~ -- /
/: ~ \\ ~\ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~~~~
~ ~ ~
'i: ~ V ~~ ~
Cherry Street
c--1 r /~ z ---~!~ VI//i/ ~~
-- ~~~~-- ~ :z
0 7//
-s
~;\' ,\\\~~\~ ~:::: ~ rt I/~J) /~
::r
>-- - \ \ ----~ :~,\~\~ //
~ . ~~
'l/~ VL
t- L--- \\\'\~~# :~.. ~ //
Linden ' Street. . .
~~ ~ f )(It:---- ~W~
~~
- ~~ ~-1
~ ~ . -- ~ \\\\\\\f\ .
~ ~ ci. ~ -----' ~ . ~\\\\\\~
~ --::=-~ ~.V;,-
r~ulberry ~. Street
~~ ~ e-----
=------~ ~~~~-----
~ --~ ~~#~
c:: ~ ~ ~ ,\'\\\\\\\ .
e::==
-- ' -------- ~
-----
M c:===-:
n of Structure ~
d
---
mal
r
r
. .
.. ':.. ~
.-. .
e
e
e
e
e
e
STILLWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN ISSUES
CONCERNING THE RCM, MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
The Stillwater Downtown Plan identifies land use changes to the residential
neighborhoods surrounding Downtown Stillwater which include sections of both
the north and south RCM, Multiple Family Residential District as shown on Map
6. The purpose of these land uses changes were to retain the character of the
existing older neighborhoods thorough density and design controls.
Three land use recommendations were stated which include:
Two public administrative/office district situated west of Third Street
and north of Myrtle Street including eity Hall, library, water department,
post office and churches. The second area runs along Pine Street between
Second Street and Fourth Street including the Junior High School and the
Historic Courthouse. Both districts provide a buffer and transition
district between the commercial core area and the lower intensity
residential areas.
Apartment density residential development, 15 units per acre, along Myrtle
Street between Third Street and Fifth Street between Myrtle Street and Oak
Street. These areas present opportunities for high density multifamily
development.
Low density multiple family allows the retention of the existing character
of the remianing RCM, Multiple Family Residential District.
11
MAJOR COMMENTS
The land use survey of th ReM, Multiple Family Residential Districts identified
the following issues:
A majority of the
structures are single family.
A majority of the structures were built before 1900. An
historic/architect ral survey may indicate that areas could be eligible
for local or natio al register districts designation.
While there were
condition of the
numerous structure
o general area OJ:' specif ic neighborhoods where the
tructure were in fair to poor condition, there were
which need major rehabilitation.
Institutional, pub ic, administrative uses and commercial uses exist in
the area, however, there is not a trend to expand these uses.
There is a trend to convert and restore existing multiple family homes into
duplex or single f ily use.
There was no rel tionship between housing density and condition of
structure.
13
e
e
e
e
e
e
. . .r"
The following is the Zoning Regulations for the RB and RCM Zoning Districts:
Two-Family Residential (HE) District
Purpose:
Provide a location for a mix of one and two-family living units with
opportunity for local retail establishments and multi-family housing
under certain circumstances.
Permitted Uses:
Single family - 7,500 square feet
Duplex - 10,000 square feet
Local retail business of corner stor~variety
Horne occupations
Special Permitted Uses:
Group Care Homes
Schools, Churches
Professional offices of person who reside at residence
other uses not found to be objectionable to the neighborhood
Setback Requirements:
Front - 30 feet
Side - Interior 10 feet
Exterior 30 feet
Rear - 25 feet
Height: 2-1/2 stories or 35 feet, whichever is less
Parking: One parking space per dwelling site
Site and design review: None
Signage: Upon review
Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RCM) District
Purpose:
The district provides a transition area between the more intense
commercial core and two-family and one-family district.
Permitted Uses:
Multi-family containing three or more units.
(12,000 square feet minimum) Horne occupations
2,800 square feet per unit
Special Permit Uses:
One and two-family units
Educational, religious and institutional buildings
Rooming houses
14
Corner store retail
other uses not foun to be objectionable to neighborhood in which they are
located
Setback Requirements:
Front - 35 feet
Side - 20 feet
Rear - 45 Feet
Height: None specified
Parking: Two spaces per
Site and design review:
Signage: Upon review
one covered
15
e
e
e
e
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING PA-
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
ZONING DISTRICT
1. Purpose: To provide a district for public, semi-public uses and
offices.
e
2. Principal permitted buildings and uses. In the Public
Administrative Office District, the following buildings and uses and
their accessory buildings and uses ~re permitted.
a. Administrative office
b. Medical offices
c. Group Day Care
d. Schools - public and private, business and technical and studios
for arts, crafts, photography, music and dance.
e. Public uses; library, post office
f. Churches and other places of worship
3. Permitted uses on special permits. In the Public and Administrative
Office District, the following buildings and uses and their accessory
buildings and us~s may be permitted by Special Use Permit.
a. Single Family, Duplex and Multi-family residential uses subject
to RCM regulations.
b. Hospitals, convalescent hospitals and nursing homes.
4. Use Determination
Any other use or service establishment determined by the City Council
to be of the same general character as the foregoing uses and which
will not impair the present or potential use of adjacent properties may
be permitted. A Special Use Permit shall be required.
5. General Regulations
a. Height of Building - maximum:
Principal building use
Accessory building
2 stories
1 story
35 feet
20 feet
b. Minimum lot area
c. Setbacks -
Front
Rear
Side
Corner Side
REQUIREMENT
10,000 square feet
30 feet
25 feet
20 feet
20 feet
e
d. Additional Requirements:
All parking areas for three or more cars next to residential
zoned land, shall be set back a minimum of ten feet and
landscaped to screen the lot from the residentially zoned land.
I
I
I
I
The City Council of the clity of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, does JLfJ".
ordain: I
1. Chapter 31.01. Subdivision 21 entitled PA-Public Administrative Office is ~
rescinded and is her after enacted to hereafter read as follows:
Subdivision 21 entitled PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE.
Adopted by Council this
day 0 f
, 1990.
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, C er
Publish:
e
e
.'
e
ORDINANCE NO. ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION' 31.01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, DOES
ORDAIN:
Section 1. The Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the
attached map marked "Exhibit A".
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council this /~. day of
(Ltr~ ,1990.
a-kztJ-/ Ohalt:J07kUXJ .
Wally ~brahamson, Mayor
\
Attest:
e . );LLg~ >!-uC) QrJ-iVVk0U
Mary Lou ;uohnson, CJJerk
.. U
~~. _ ~11 c:<.. 3; /C)S d
publish: L) . d J
e
<; i
--.J
"' "'" \
J
L ~ \
'\ "E1.\l1e 1\ 1\"
\
\
~ \
'X
"t \
-J \
\
\
\
\
~
~ 0"
\~.,. "
""
///
,. ~ .'
\
\ .
\ ~.,.
'//'/' 11\\<\/90-6
// RB, 1~0
f j\tn L '(
\ RESIDEN11l\L
~S1R1 Cl
,
,
'"
-
....
"
~
"
"
~
e
'e
e
ORDINANCE NO. ~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION" 31 .01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, DOES
ORDAIN:
Section 1. The Zoning Map is amended as indicated on the
attached map marked "Exhibit A".
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council this /~, day of
(LtL~J
()
1 1990.
\'
;,)- ,;;;7 l2" / ,
U'(;l(%~1 crz.a/c.C'vne4W'7G'
Wally /Abrahamson, Mayor,
Attest: " .'
, );L~~ ,~L) QrtJVVU-tAu
Mary LOU/Johnson, C~erk
- U
Publish:
u~~y 0<. ~
;c;9d
"'l r ~
VI
.~ 1\11 , '''>.
I
\.u '.\
x
"'l
-.I
.'(,
//;/
. .'
\ 11\~/90-7
\
~I\, pUB Ll C
'\ I\Dt.\lt-\IS1RI\11'
" OffICE
" DIS1RIC1
'" .
"
"
~
"
"
~
r illwater
~ -- - ~
--- -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA .)
--
RE:
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 4, 1990
ANN TERWEDO, PLANNER
ZONING AMENDMENT - RB, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT TO CBD, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.
TO:
DATE:
FROM:
The property located at 601 North Main Street is presently
zoned RB, Two Family. This zoning does not reflect the
existing train attraction use of this property. Also, the
Downtown Plan identifies the land use and subsequent zoning
of these areas as CBD, Central Business District as shown
on the attached maps.
e
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend to the City Council that the attached zoning map
amendment be approved.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
RDINANCE NO. ~
AN ORDINANCE DING THE STILLWATER CITY CODE
SECTION""3 .01, SUBDIVISION 5, ENTITLED
ZONING/ STABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS,
-
THE CITY COUNCIL F THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, DOES
ORDAIN:
.
Section 2. This rdinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its pas age and publication according to law.
Section 1. The Z ning Map is amended as indicated on the
attached map marked liE hibit A".
Adopted by Council thi I ~. day of
(UL()u-J
tJ
, 1990.
\ \
It) .l 'ad /
/t:lt.&.j '!fZc:i/c.-c:v!7t4H'''K....-:
Wally ~brahamson, Mayor
Attest: 0'
, );Lcg~ >1-uC) ~
Mary Lou jcrohnson, CH~r
- U
~~_, .-!'o J! ~3) /7S0
Publish: L) _, d ._J
e
e
..
e
I
I
I
I
I
,
I'
I
f
e
e
"
~
.~
0\
ST. CROIX RIVER
~ Cenltal Busr.ess Os\l'd -.-
[ill f\JbIc Adrrlrls~albn. Office
~ Trnnsp::rlalb'\ Ulties, ~
~ Parks, Recreation, Q:>en Space
[EJ low Dansby Res<Jen11a1
IiE3 Modlum Oensby Residential
~ HIgh Densby Res<Jenllal
~ Mama, Recreatbn
i'
';!,
fFlIi Sf.
STILLWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN
ng..e 2
Proposed Land Use !11111 L. f)
t
Iv
~
"'-
V1
.'!
,
I
ST. CROIX RIVER
~ Cenlral Buslnoss Cls~k:t - . -
1m F\Jbic Adrtinls~aloo.Olfice
~ Tran5IXl<lallor\ mties, ""'lOng
~ Parks. Reaeallon, Open Space
00 T \YO Fanily Resldenllal
~ Mldium Denshy Resldenllal
~ ~lgh Denshy Resldenllal
(liJ Spedal Sile
- BkJlllandlShorcland IEasl oIlhll
- - Flood Plain IEasl 01 [Jrel
x
~
'"
I
r
~
~
~
~FB 1 p -- -- ---
f
I
fflH
51.
I
STILLWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN
Ague 3 '
Proposed Zoning !llI1' L. ~
"
e
e e
~I ~
~ ~.
~,~
:..: ~,~
" ~/~'
I
,
/-
I
I
'- 1: 1
~ z'
0'
.: ~ I
V) -J
WI
~i
C)
l<
"
~
~
~
-...J
\
\
\
\
)
'\
I
rJ
~':XH1BIT A"
I
,
i
i
I
I
"5o'-'" oCt-" . I
L
B..~ness \~str~t
.~\ \\ ~
\ \ \ l
. I
.\ \ !
, '
'0-
/'~1-
....'T . C-
. .l~ lL~
..,,",ZR ; ~-.,. i ... :
..... ,-~ "
'''~: '..~ l~/" ."'" \:
, .""-
. ~.
\~ ~;','
'.~l~
,
\
\ ~
~/\
ZAM/90-5
CBD, Central
.
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-
e
e
e
#-~
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/DR/90-61
Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990
Project Location: 220-224 East Chestnut Street.
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District.
Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Shawn and Becky Otto
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the parking ordinance and design review for residential/
commercial use at 220-224 East Chestnut Street.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to restore the building at 220-224 East Chestnut Street. for
first floor commercial/office space and second floor residential. The
restoration as shown on the elevation is a planned certified restoration. The
applicants are working with the Preservation Office on their certification.
The parking demand for both the residential and commercial use is thirteen or
sixteen parking spaces. There is no on-site parking to provide for this use.
The elevation plan explains the general restoration work on the building.
Major facade improvements are to restore the original street level facade or
inspect the glass tile facade at commercial level and restore that. The second
level facade is intact. A porch was attached to the building at one time. A
smaller porch is planned to be on this level.
The restoration plan meets the intent of the design guidelines and purpose of
the Preservation Ordinance.
Signage is not shown on the elevation; however, the applicants have stated
that window painting in period style, approved simple bracketed hangings sign
and awnings, may be placed on the building. All signage must be approved.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. Parking tor the commercial use is designated to the assigned city
parking lots.
2. A sign plan for the building shall be submitted within the requirements
of the Sign Ordinance.
3. On-street parking for the residential use is allowed after 4:00 P.M.
and before 8:00 A.M. Monday thru Saturday. The applicant may contract
for off-street parking with private property owners at their
discretion.
4. An engineer's report shall be submitted to the Building Department in
reference to the porch on the second level.
1
FINDINGS: The proposed estoration meets the purpose of the Preservation
Ordinance and Design Revie Guidelines. Although the parking does not meet the
parking requirements, t e conditions of approval assigns alternate locations
for parking.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COM ISSION/DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The H.P.C. recommends t e certified restoration plan for this project. It
meets the intent of the d sign guidelines and Preservation Ordinance. This
project is one of the first projects in Downtown Stillwater to take advantage
of the tax credit for res oration. It is a great example for future projects
of this type.
There was concern about the extension of the porch on the second level. The
applicant stated an eng neer's report will be submitted to the Building
Department before buildin permits are issued.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Elevation Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOM ENDATION: Approval.
2
~'-~
-
-
e
e
.J
.. ~
(V/Of?jqOJ LI)
Cdse Number ~J.!!~_~l___
1000
Fee Paid _______--==-_____
o
e
.~~~
Da~e Filed -------------- 0-'1\ ~ "
. PLANNING. ADMINISTRATIVE FORJv\ .;'\\ ~_C(~\J ')'
Street Location or Property: __~6Q_-:.~lj;-__~~",=-~.?.:r-~~r._-___~___ L-j.. '0-
Legal Description of Property: __tt_l9r-~-I_~-y:t~.f-2lJs,.-~~.f.._OJl\.C;J!:'~-~\-.Jr0
Owner: Na~e ___~.0t-~l'2b:-__&~.1?__~\d:E:._.G.~~6:.C~~QC.vf~~-'?1"'~_'i+-WA\..A> ~E\,ts'f't,S
Address__~~--_=S--~~\~--~------ Phone:_______________
Ap"plicant (if other than oWIler): Na~e __~_~'::::'~_I~_..P2~~'i__Q_T.T~____
Address _J~~3_-1~~~~~~~~-l~.lh---_-- Phone: _22~t:9.h~b_Lwj
___ Rezoning ___ Approval' of Preliminary Plat
___ Special Usa Permit ___ Approval of ~in~1. Plat
.:x,Yariance ___ Other ____~______:.....______
, Q, '
Description of Request: _TQ-_f.<-g~~A~__J~::L2~'!l=f._1ts__~~s'=+_~~-B..:t.2~~:!JNG Prs PEJ2ft111
~~~-~~~'€.N_l'--9~E-~~C?--9.,tl_\..._~i--.d..~-~~~--s.1j)..s:..-p~~~~~-51f~-<::.-__~CA'ei)
j)'!y':f[S1:..~'i. _~~~J::._D__ ~_jJJ:?~f.f'".i_::r~I-Q.~_...;~.92=..Dt.~~.S>___V~~.:>__~11 J \Y:), t00P-I~ -
Signatu~e or Applicant: _~~CJ'k'k_____
Type of Re9uest:"
Date of Public Hearing: ---------------------------------------------
. NOTE: Sketch of proposed 'property and structure to be drawn 1n back oi. t.'ris ior.n or at.
tc..ched, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Loc;;.tion or proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions or :front and side set-backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
5. Street names.
6. Loc<ition or adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other inior:w.ation as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by the .Planning Commission on ___________ (da~e)
subiec7 ~o the following condi-tions: ------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
e Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subiec ~o the
following conditions: -------------------------------------------'-----
------------------------------------------------------------------
Commen~s: (Use o~her side)
#' .,)
o~ C\-l-cS~j\i \'1~ \)P-C\JI"%lC-rJ O~ ~f'O'i I\N~ RB\.-)A.Q:,I...-~' Pf>l~\,q)0G
~E.\IV&. \?A(>.-Af"'O"'~1- \c:. F\T1PAG- T\~G. ~r->-'P f"\P\,.,l)-t:l\f0 \"'G.. R.cOSi De-,JT)A1....
~ erJ~"">TS ~C~ ~ ~ Sec..c...->.c S'1"-olt.-'i ':9- ~R.. ApR-fl-T M8tJlS .
) ~
t:.. CH~'SlrJVr
l~
S'f\'u"
r
I
\
i
~
'd--.d.-Lf
~~
do-o
S () l::>:) e-c:r ?(lI-Q9~~;-'1
,/
C
6
I;)
&'
e
d-. rJ.fJ
SiAt,L-
N\
\J;
e
e e
~~~i~l~~-j;:~~i~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~
Id:SL~:I~'~-:-=-_F'PlCl<. ';,c'r'D~-~~:l) r-- ~~'il] 'rl"1....0; """I'~~~. :
I ,1r71l I .(, 1/1!;)',l':'"
i : I ~~;~~t I .' 'I I -'~'-~ ~
l L~L__L=J__L)J~_j~~~~j ,l(~ _~=t
I i !'~<?\'F'
I . . 11,IV::::Oj ! l'p~1
I____J II~I.. ,1111 l_.._,____,._J Ill, II
Ilil~JI, .,.--.1'
I 'I I
--_._-_._-_.._J._lJ__.......~a.:..J_
e
", '::, .~~ ~ ;:;. .
._----,
,
,
.
,
,
---,'---.. --r----1
/ ~q/,.
/ "II)!I.
-_.~;_/~dJ/~Jt-~f__~-.-.J
.- _._~.. "'--"'-". .
'3CUTHr-LEVA"rICN. (CHESTNUT)
---..-'''.--.... "-..
1/'
" :":~~1::~~~;':-;; ."..
\'
1-,',
,
I ,: ;::
F~..:
i :. i:.~. ~.., .
'i':"'~ ,.../":....:...}
~a~~~~~~~~
GENERAL NOTES ON EXTERIOR RESTORATIO
. .
";-'';' ,
. '0 01 Provide MarviD Alpine. or equivalent wood ,urround oombination ,torm windoM, Field
and measure Cor aUey windows.
Provide fuU.view interior ,Iorm door al baloony 10 pr..erve hislorical Cacade.
Impect and replace rolled trim with like milled new wood, or sound salvage oC l8Dle I'
Remove awning al 224 and r..lore original ,treetlevel Cacade.
NOle: aignage limited 10 window painting in period ,tyle, appro""d ,imple bnckeled han!
General oontraClor to provide I)'I1Imelrical ,ignage Cor both commercial spa= as eaUe,
R 06". . Rescrew, renail and resolder galvanized sheet melal cornice as occusary; remo,""
extemiom Crom oorwce and palch wilb ,beet melaL
G 07 Remo,"" doon and block eolumD alstueco 'treellevel Trim out Dew OpeDing with period
. 6' wrougbl irOD Cence and gate.
o 08 Comlruct oorbcI supporled 4' x 8' ooppct truled wood balcoDY with 5/4 x 6' truted d,
" .. , ,tone ribboD and tic corbels into eraming al cod oC,lair walli. ' Provide period 'Iyle nil
. E 09 ':.. Provide and inslall photo-oonlroUed brass coach lighls nanking 222 eDlrance @ T.
, 0 10. . P.ulk and weatherstrip all exterior windOM, doon and brick molding.
. 0 11,: :: Provide +color polychromatic paint finish 10 trim. Prime and finish 2 coats. Cut prime
.', '.,~~" 'or Penelrol. additive. Per color ,cheme to be decided,
. . M.12.' Tuckpoinl all 100", or delerioraled morlar joinls; replace mwing or delerioraled brick fror
.." ,',.: ,'c" ,toci:. Match lexture, consislency, color, and looling oC original mortar,
, ":,' E 13 ':;Provide and imlall 2o-uDil ,ccurity intercom with eledrowe latch at 222 eDtrance Cor upI'
'. 0 14 : ". 'Inspect 'glass tile Cacade al commercial leve~ Ch..taut Street elevatioD. Provide ..Iimal'
" : .; " .', damag. 10 original brick Cacade. Provide a1leroate proposallO remo,"" tile, maslie and
!".'" ::,' ,>'., ',clean, !'I'd poinl brick as necessary 10 restore to origiDaI appearance.
.' 0 15':; Repair 'lueco at UnioD Street back addition where damaged. 'Paint ,Iueco and trim. a:
M 16,.'.. RemoVe cracked slab at alley, Crom Cacade wall to and including ramp. Sand as ncceuary;
:., :,'''::,'' and tamp while 'oCI wilh oobblcstoDe pattern ~mboucr.. Pour embossed riser in place 01
:' 0 ~7, . r Remove shed over back ,tair, to 220 basement. Replace with Cull heighl walls in same local
'. CuU-view Castlegate. or equivalent ,teel door with divided light grid. Abandon ,tairs and
, laundry room per A.2. .' . '. '
E 19 Provide new 300 amp ,crvice with 4 100 amp locking panels aDd one house locking sub
Provide 3 pboto oontroUed lights in alley area. "
Purr in tran.som window over back door to 220; finish,
Remo~ abandoned back ,lairs Crom ,eoond noar; insulate and palch ceiling, '
.1mpcct alley ceiling under addilion Cor adequate insulation. ,Patch in Cor uniform ,heathin
estimale it necessary 10 inslall a wood-framed drop ceiJing, f",ished wilh ,hcathing or 5/
, purposC$ oC obtaining adequate R-value"
o 22 Prepare and lepaint aUey brick and block 2 coals in a color to be decided.
, G 02.
003
004
005
.
!,'
019'
020
021
~Uli~
if~Jl~~:;'{,:;
.~ b 0,"'"
;dl~l
.g;x:'O ,<tI.
~illil
,....:.:~ 01""";2'
lIilll
~ --,_ J
if. 'il'-
13"
if,-=ii \
Ir--" "
_ 10 I \
_ . . .. I
rr~~
Ill" j il.
I:i :;: q:;
I ~ 1 fl i I) :
ill :\\ Ii) \
,!; I' .1"
I ," '1' ,
_ _ i ~
I'
!:
!:
, ;
;' :~:
: ~! ~: ~ ~--;., =-'~-~-'---'-'ln
':::: ;, 3 Iii' 1;', ::1 i
,.,,:.''; ~ r ""i,'
" . [~;. ~ _.__7__ '--.J
:!: : r..'~; ;; ~
. ~~i ~ I! x
:':1' tt:
:1
r;--"':" :.21--
!! ...;:..l w
!~ 'j-G~
i ~ ~~ i
-::H
{~y
,.;
. i:
: \: Ii:
'I' ;;
I ~ I
" :,"
. I H
;. '0'
: I;
'i i
~ i
:.; ",i" .,.~.., .
~ ; i '
:i!;' Jj .
i: Ii.
i ~ i ;, . ~ f:~
: i i lr :~
: 1\ 1\ ,I! ii
Iii ili ;2! [l
1'.:1 ,Ii ! E i ill
II hilt.; ;,
l! IIi! .~ g 1 '1 i
~ : i :;~ ! D: i I
i \ I :i ~ ! rJ! I l
"1" :b I 'I
i' ;:! ...... i !
I ~ 1 if ~ ~ ~: ! i
t i I I ~ I :::::2! : I
Iii :!i !~ II!
n;---nP; "
- I I
!!Cr-.:-_.-"'":"-~~~
! 1 ' - ..:-::=-
:! ill '
i~ i! "', 11 ,'. p!
I I,~""I
:1 i'i -W--==1'
j' t'~.::;:::.- ", .- Ii
! ~ :.. !
.""
!.. ~
$1"
~ r
a ij .......
::1 I: '....:'.
~
j'
II
r~
-""11 I
.'~~"JII
u '
~. ... .~.. '-.-- ./
I r= - -~
'I! <:. If"~-I' 11
U " ,j ...... ". ,i
I .... I
-----..:._-~_.__._.__._-
[:
~ e .!!! l5 .:
cc.~uo
:cd{l~~ .
5-g~~'O~
'iii~c~Jg.~
ctD8=:xQ5
E.2 C,,,,'O
._-;~lij-.;cd
~.oc=1il-
1iiO~<O"t:-a
.?;-:: ='.!: J!l'Qj
'cogje';
~tiOCll .;
"'C~-O=lD
a;'E~cOl1i1
~o coco-
oof;"E"'Cui
-;;;;,;Eg.2:!:
~cs<oOE
ooocu.s-
~ ~ g.f; B ~
-E 5L()'~co~
o~~.oU)e
tt'O-E CD R-
.oc._'Oocd
='Ol;;:cd~Ol'
en ",CIl CIlc..C
-otDo- :0
c"OfiigJfIi=
CDO~;;:C='
aO=' 0.0
o~~-g1iicD
~.Q~~"5g
5E.:B ~ ~~
Q ;;:JJl.&cd~
I~ Iii.. :'{
. '. . ....
I ..' I t~
~ ',___.;:R
J
f'
. !
"":
:lr
'I
U~6i
\,.......-.. ---
-:..:: =---
-.-.--..:....;:..=--.-- .-.:";';;'
i~?: , .-=~il;L-._..~-
I _ ---'1'
I: ~ ;~~==:!:1
t ,".
i=
0:
W
()
- ........;
(f)
z
o
~
ru
..J
w
M
<
;:;';
m
o
w
>
o
~
~
~
<
~
.~
. -..
:so oft
r1
--
a-
w
-'
<
u
~
w
~
<
o
w
f-'
~
:...J
..J
i=
en
r:
::>
z
f-
en
W
J:
Q
W
.....
C\I
C\I
N
C\I
C\I
6
C\I
C\I
~z
C\I-
C\I~
enJ:
~en
f-W
a: a:
Wu..
c.. ..
Oa:
a:0
c..r-
s-:Q
Z~
o!z
..0
ffiO
c....J
g~
WW
(ij~
Clc)
-
0....
::::~
....:
f-
<'(
>
....
-'
1>1
r'
III
I..
)
.-i '~
e
'"",,: ;..:
e
e
. .
e
e
e
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/DR/90-62
Planning Commission Meeting: October 8, 1990
Project Location: 601 North Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: Dave Paradeau (Minnesota Zephyr)
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The proposal is for a 4,500 square foot depot structure and 67 car parking lot
on an 1.34 acre site. Twenty one of the parking spaces and landscaping extend
on to the Highway 95 right-of-way and City property. The twenty one car
parking lot and landscaping to the north of the site is on City of Stillwater
property. A portion of the site is located in the Flood Plain District.
During preparation of the Downtown Plan, this site was designated Special Use
Site #2. Use and design guidelines were specified for the site (attached). The
use proposed for the site is consistent with the Downtown Plan 'guidelines. The
design guidelines specify that the site landscaping complement the North Main
Street streetscape plans. Based on the proposed improvements, most of the
landscape screening is located on the road right-of-way and not the project
site. The State must give the applicant permission for the project to encroach
on the right-of-way.
The 21 car parking lot located North of the existing railroad spur is owned by
the City. The City has indicated they will consider leasing the land to the
developer for employee parking as long as the parking is completely screened
from highway viewing. The developer would be responsible for improving the
parking lot and landscaping the site screening the lot.
A railroad spur currently separating the City land from the project site. In
order for the project to work, the spur will have to be abandoned by the
ra il road.
DESIGN REVIEW:
The first level of the depot will be constructed of quarry stone, similar to
stone walls located in downtown Stillwater, redwood siding, and redwood
brackets will be accent materials at this level. The roof line of the depot is
similar to depots built early in this century and the GAS timberline shakes
are modern copies of roof treatments on early depots. The dormers and central
atrium area add interest to the design. A Stillwater sign will be located on
the north and south elevation of the depot. These are simple signs
characteristic of railroad signs for stations. The round arched windows and
the elements of the dormers are reminiscent of the Union Depot in Stillwater.
The preliminary site plan shows where the depot will be located on the site
and parking for the use. The site shows sixty seven parking spaces. The
1
lighting on the site will be similar to the light posts in Downtown Stillwater
Plan along with similar decorative benches. The proposed landscaping was
appropriate on the North ntrance into Stillwater. ~
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The project does not meet the development requirements (setback, parking,
signage) for the district. The site is in the R-B Duplex Residential Zoning
District. (A change in zoning is being proposed, Case No. ZAM/90-5.) A
thirty foot'setback is re uired for the building. The proposal is setback less
than twenty feet from th front property line. The parking requirement for the
depot if considering the rain as a restaurant using one space per 2.5 seats
is 88 spaces. The applicant has indicated that 120 spaces are necessary for
employee and customer par ing.
If the highway right-of-way spaces are subtracted from the project, 46 spaces
are available for the use. This is 42 spaces less than what is required and 74
spaces less than what is needed. The plans show 21 spaces on City property
North of the site and 26 spaces on Highway right-of-way, bringing the total to
eighty nine (89). The City is planning on constructing a 70 to 80 car parking
lot on the property ac oss Laurel Street directly South of the site.
REgardless of MnDot's etermination, parking will be available for the use
with the construction of the parking lot.
The landscape plan sho s a landscaped area on the MnDOT Highway right-of-way
between the parking lot nd NOrth Main Street. A five foot sidewalk is shown
next to the street wit a space for three feet of landscaping before the
parking lot begins. Thi minimal sidewalk and landscaping improvement for
section of the street rontage. If permission for use of the right-of-way for ~
private parking is not g anted, adequate land will be available for parking. ,.,
A design guidelines on he Downtown Plan indicates that parking areas shall be
screened from Main Stree view. It is recommended that a ten foot landscaped
area be required betwe n the parking area and the street or a 2 1/2 foot
screen wall and landscaping similar in the stone used in the building be used
to screen the parked cars from street view. This site is particularly
important because it is the first City development as one enters from the
North.
The site plan shows La rel Street (Yacht Club driveway being relocated to the
South and use of the rig t-of-way for parking and landscaping. This would have
to be approved by the Ya ht Club and Burlington Railroad.
No lighting plan has been submitted and a location for a monument type
free-standing sign is sh wn directly in front of the depot (in the Highway
right-of-way) .
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A detailed slgn ge plan showing signage detail shall be submitted for
Design Review Com ittee approval. One free-standing monument sign is
allowed on the ite which shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet and ~
not project highe than six (6) feet. The sign must be setback fifteen ,.,
2
e
e
e
2.
(15) feet from any point of vehicular access, public roadway, or
property line. The area around the sign shall be landscaped. This plan
shall be submitted to the City for review.
A lighting plan shall be submitted for Design Review Committee
approval.
If the employee parking area North of the site is constructed by the
applicant on City land, the six spaces on the East side of the lot
shall be eliminated.
3.
4.
Parking lot landscaping shown on the site, Highway 95 right-of-way and
City land shall be installed by the applicant before project completion
and occupancy.
The applicant shall agree to be assessed for the City parking lot to
the South of the site, based on the site parking demand.
The City Engineers shall review the plan to relocate Laurel Street and
the City shall obtain BN and Yacht Club approval as needed before
building permits are issued.
The first floor elevation and all mechanical equipment shall be
elevated above the regulated 100 year flood level.
8. The development agreement between the City and the developer shall be
modified to include these conditions.
5.
6.
7.
9. This approval is based on MnDOT approval of use of the Main Street
right-of-way for landscaping and parking. If MnDOT approval is not
gained, a revised parking landscape plan shall be reviewed and approval
by the Planning Commission before building permits are issued.
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION/DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The design of the depot and the site plan meet the intent of the Design
Guidelines. The depot design incorporates old architectural elements into new
design. It is very sensitive to the visual image of Stillwater.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Site plan.
- Building Plan.
3
....J "'. I I I v -- ,",.~. . .
. , v (jO , '
Fee Paid ----!.-~:..~:::..::r:..~ "f~,
Date file~ _:i-_fJi.Q___.!.~/J-/fi ()
PLANNIN
ADl\AINlSTRA TIVE FORlv\
~~_l_~_~~J[~__~_~~~_________________
"e
, ~
Street Location ot Pro pert
Legal Description of Prop rty: ________________________________..:_______
Owner: Name t'{\..~j~~% I~_~_e.~~L!:b.~I-0--~~-l!~~--~~--C~?Ft4~
Address ~J2J__ _~~~______________ P'nonelt2.1:k2~~Q_~Qoer
A60liccnt (if other then 0 J1er): Name .hJAJ.L.t..::Aui.L~~________
· . Address _______ ______________~~_____!p~gt _~~~~~
Type of Request:o
___ Approval of Preliminary Plat
___ Approxal of Final Plat
:__ Other_________~_~_~__~__
Description of Request: Z~2k~...H'ZJ!~_Z?~.LE.rL-e(2"--~---------
x-
- .
ezonlng
pecial Use Permit'
. .
e
____~~:r~~~-~-- __~~~~~e~~-~~~~------------~------
. ---------------------
Dete of Public Hearing: ____________________________________________
NOTE: Sketch of proposed rooertv and structure to be drawn,on back of this form or at-
tached, showing the 'oliowing: '
North di ection.
Location of proposed structure on lot.
Dimensio s of front and side set-backs.
Dimensio s of proposed structure.
Street n"mes. __ _0 __. _ <?.'i':'OF'
Location of adjacent existing buildings. ' . sr,...!~.~'!-!~I(Wi-: .
Other i ormation as may be requested. .b' o<)~~ .:~~,' 0 .
(~ ~. '
Approved ___ Denied.:... _ by the 'Pl~:mning Commission on _______q~jl!;t(
b. '.I. .I.h f II' d'~' "
su lecr 10 I e ,0 oWing con Idons: _____________________________'_______
1.
2.
) .,
v.
4.
5.
6,
7.
-~-------------------------------------------
Approved ___ Denied _ _ by the Coun cil on __..:.::--:,-.:.::...:;:....:;.____...:_ -subiect to tha~:<::, C:ii'" ,-;.;
following conditions: __
, ,
" .
Comments: (U~e other ide), "0
I " "
"
e
'.
'. . ".
ST. CROX AIVEA
\ \
Ir""n
". ,-; _:.. ':- "'...1_
-1 ~.--..
I I".'''' I I
. - -=-., I
I 1''''11 t t I I
~. --J.-
i-';- f
. -'j r
STILLWATER DOWNTOWN PLAN
S;;:cial Sites 1-6,9 11J.1J. I LIlT fj)
e
e
e
Preferred Land Use:
Correctional interpretive center, St. Croix River infor-
mation center, hotel conference center, service/office uses,
clean light industrial uses.
Design Guidelines:
o Maintain and restore prison site, buildings and
grounds, in the historic image of the old prison
setting. '
o Use Department of Interior's Rehabilitation Standards
for rehabilitation of historic sites and buildings.
~ Special Site #2
Entering Downtown from the North, this site is located oppo-
site,the prison on the riverside of Main Street between the
ra 11 road tracks and Main Street. The i rregul arly shaped
one-acre site ,is long' and narrow; making it difficult for
most types of conmercia 1 deve i opment. City approva 1 shave
been g1ven for a railroad depot, staging facility for the
existing Dinner Train operation. The City owns land inme-
diately to the south of the Depot site that may be necessary
to provide adequate on-site parking. This site is of par-
cu ar mpor ance ec
to Stillwater which begins to define the appearance of North
Main Street.
Preferred land Use:
Office, restaurant, museum.
Design Guidelines:
o The project landscape plan shall complement the new
streetscape design for the North Main Street.
44
e
"
I
.
"
I
I
I
I
-
II
I
,
,
I
J
.
Deslgn Guidelines:
o The project landscape plan shall complement the new
streetscape design for the North Main Street.
o Parking areas should be screened from Maln Street view
by landscaping or other methods.
o Downtown Design Guidelines, Central Business District
and Floodplain Development requirements shall be met.
o A pedestrian pathway connecting the river walkway
system with Main Street shall be provided.
o On-site parking shall be provided for staff and patrons
at a rate of one space per employee at maximum shift
and one space per 2.5 dinner places.
Specia l' Site #3
/'
This site is just south of Site #2, sitting on the east side
of Main Street overlooking the marina. The two-acre site is
currently underutilized wlth commercial uses in a converted
gas station. Located overlooking the marina and river, the
property has good potential for residential use. Based on
the demand for future office, retail and hotel sites, there
is adequate land closer to Downtown that could provide those
uses. Residential use on Site #3 would extend residential
use below Pioneer Park across Main Street and provide clo-
sure and definition to North Main Street commercial acti-
vity. Depending on design, the residential use could frame
a visual gateway for southbound vehicles along Main Street.
Preferred Land Use:
Multifamily Residential.
Other uses: office, retail, commercial, hotel or public
parking.
46
e
e
,J
e
e
e
e
t
,~,
./
: /
!/
~
i
C"~.d dS d t
I 1 ,.' I 'r ' " ." ,..,! I ~ ;
'1Jlft, ,A~S an; {, la,w ! 'u' .s'; .",--..,-
!!!:I' ~ .&.. ~;"o ~ _ _". ,... .. -... ::if' rJ ~ ~...
raiCroacfing menwries
July 24, 1990-September 30,1990
Vault exhibit room
Monday-Friday, 9am to 3 pm
or by appointment
Washington County Historic Courthouse
, ,
, "
\ ..,
I. '\"
\\
\, . ~
; ,
I
\
~ ,
/.
/
/
..1
'"
' -
, '\
'_'.
Stillwater Union Depot, original drawing, 1887
e
e
.' ~
M E M 0
R
AND U M
TO:
Steven Russell, Community Development Director
FROM:
ALLEN o. ZEPPER, Building Official
DATE:
October 8, 1990
RE:
Fire Suppression System, Minnesota Zephyer Depot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Building has approximately 4725 square feet of ground coverage
plus a second floor of undetermined size and use. It is safe to
assume that the second story will tatal more that 275 square feet,
eclipsing the 5000 EBQ~~ square foot requirement for a suppression
system. In addition, the l~luseum" area has a total of approximately
2000 square foot of 8=g~1 Assembly area with the occupancy calculated
on the basis of 1 person per~ 3 squar~e foot. (1988'U.B.C. Table 33-A,
subsection 3) This figures to 000.00 persons in the museum area
alone. I appears that without e v en\ fi guri ngthe office ar~ea,
kitchen, storage etc., the building more than doubles the required
amount of persons needed to require a suppression system thru out the
building, incll..\ding both floors.
In addition, ,I would like to point out the requirement of a
substancial grease trap in the kitchen area. The plans are not that
complete yet, but just a reminder that it will be required.
e
e
r illwater
~ --~
--- -~
THE BIRTHPLACE DF MINNESDTA J
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: NOVEMBER 6, 1990
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR A SEVEN LOT OAK GLEN
NINTH ADDITION.
BACKGROUND:
The request is to receive Final Subdivision Approval for a
seven lot area (outlot T). A preliminary plat was
previously approved for this site as part of the Planned
Unit Development approval.
The Final Plat request has been reviewed by the City
Engineer for utility and drainage easements. The lot sizes
exceed the RA, Single Family Residential lot standards.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval - by resolution.
ATTACHMENT:
Final Plat
e
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
"'SaJ
ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER ORNE, 5T. PAUL, MINNESarA 55110 612490-2000
e
November 1, 1990
RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
PLANNING CASE REVIEWS
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW
CASE NO.
Mr. Steve Russell,
Community Developm
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth S
Stillwater, MN 55
nt Director
Dear Mr. Russell:
e
We have reviewed t e preliminary plat for Oak Glen 9th Addition.
Drainage and utili y easements shown on the plat appear adequate.
Lot dimensions alo g McKusick Road Court are consistent with a
previous submitta used for the construction of utilities.
Existing service subs (sanitary sewer and water) will therefore
fit the proposed p at. It appears that the area of Lot 7 should
be 17,707 square f et +.
If you have any qu
please contact me.
Si~relY ,
~~(.f vtf
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
BCP/cih
e
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
ST PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
... -l ...
, r ....,.. t 1
e
~ illwater
"~ -- - ~
"-- -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1990
SUBJECT; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON NEW STILLWATER/HOULTON HIGHWAY 36
BRIDGE.
SECTION 106 REVIEW
In response to the City of StiJlwater.s concern for the impact of a new bridge
on Stillwater's historic and cultural resources, MnDOT is preparing a Section
106 Study. A Section 106 Study evaluates the impacts of federal and state
highway projects on historic resources. The City.s Heritage Preservation
Commission and Staff have reviewed the Section 106 Study and offer the
comments contained in the attached memo.\
e
RECOMMENDATION:
AFter the C i ty Cou nc il revi ew of the memo, it is recommended that Staff be
directed to prepare a letter commenting on the detrimental impact of a
no-build or central corridor on Stillwater historic cultural resources.
VISUAL IMPACT OF CENTRAL CORRIDOR BRIDGE DECISION OR REPLACEMENT BRIDGE:
The central corridor bridge location would make a significant negative impact
on the environmental quality of Downtown Stillwater. As can be seen in the
three drawings showing the existing bridge, central corridor bridge and
replacement bridge. Beside the negative visual impact, the air pollution and
noise generated by 30,000 car trips per day would cause irreparable damage the
qualities of Downtown Stillwater.
RECOMMENDATION:
It lS recommended that copies of these drawings be sent from the Council to
MnDOT further showing the City's concern for the bridge project.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Memo from Heritage Preservation Commission regarding 106 Study and Draft
106 document.
- Additional TSME Downtown Stillwater analysis November 1,1990.
- Three drawings showing visual impact of the new bridge on Downtown.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
>--~ ' ',.
, \
~
t;<
-
I,J)
-\
Z
Cl
cP
70
a
Cl
rn
\
5
o
'C
-z.
Cl
~
rn
I,J)
-\
'-...
e
~l
'\
"'-
\
~
t
J "
\ \ \
Jtf,."r~\~~ ~,\
,-1,,\\ '
,,\~.l I '~\,
(..(.
...
,~
\
..\
'"
~
~ \"" V{'
11 " \~
'~ ~"~
'--
'\
'"
---....
'-.
--
"
\
~
\.-:, .
"
\
"
--.
\
\
\
\
,
t'
\
\
"-
'\,
"-
\
<. \
<..
\
',,-
'\
\
\
\
\ \
, . ,
\
'\
...--
.
, "
, ~
"
'~
"~
"
- -"- - ~-----
'\
.e
"""
\
\
'....
\
~
\
. -,...
/
,./
/
/'
/
/
.,
/
./
.-/"-"
~_..---
,//
~
,- ~
/
/
~ .J
""
oJ J .J
0.
/
/
//
/
/
i-
/+- I.f[.--
,/..:---"
w
-_.~
.---
~'
..,. ..----
..;> -
(~
/
CEN1R'AL CORR\~_-~--------_.--
e
.,.
.
"\
i'
J-
.
e,
e
e
e
)
,
, ( , ,it
q
.
r i1lwater
~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
ANN TERWEDO/HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 6, 1990
SUBJECT: SECTION 106 REVIEW DOCUMENTATION COMMENTS
BACKGROUND
The Section 106 process is mandated by federal statutes to identify historic
resources and then determine what effect a certain undertaking (in this case,
the bridge crossings) have on these resources. '
The State Historic Preservation Office and local government are requested to
comment on the document.
The Section 106 Review Report, drafted by Mn DOT, is a response from the City
of Stillwater's concern about the impacts of certain proposed bridge corridors
of the Stillwater/Houlton bridge crossing on historic Downtown Stillwater.
Downtown Stillwater was declared a local historic district last year and is a
pending National Register District. By federal statutes, under the National
Historic Preservation Act, Section 106, review is required. This document is
prepared by the managing agency (Mn DOT).
POTENTIAL IMPACTS/EFFECTS: Please review the Section 106 Review Report and the
Heritage Preservation Commission comments.
CENTRAL CORRIDOR
The Central Corridor will adversely effect the historic ambiance of Lowell
Park as well as the Historic Commercial District according to the criteria of
Effect and adverse Effect under 36 CFR part 800: "Protection of Historic
Properties" which govern the Section 106 review process: 800.9 (b) An
undertaking is considered to have an adverse effect when the effect on an
historic property may diminish the integrity of the property's location,
design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association. Adverse
effects on historic properties include, but are not limited to: (3)
Introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of
character with the property or alter its setting. II Lowell Park was planned in
1918 and developed in the 1920's and 1930's and is a contributing site in a
pending National Register District. It is visited and used by residents of
Stillwater and is a regional park for the neighboring Twin Cities metropolitan
area. The original intent of this urban park has not changed. It was developed
because of its setting on the St. Croix River. A Central Corridor would alter
the passive recreational use of this park with the enjoyment of the views
along the St. Croix River Valley. The Downtown Commercial Historic District,
which, as stated, is a pending National Register Historic District, the
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
1
.
~'
\
- (,
- .
historic homes on the r'ver bluffs, the lift bridge on the National Register ~
of Historic Places, and t e Mortimer Webster and the Freight House, also on ~
the National Register 0 Historic Places are all part of the history of the
river valley. A Central C rridor bridge would adversely affect the association
of this community with th St. Croix River.
NO BUILD/NO ACTION:
The no build/no action cenario would have a direct adverse effect according
to 800.9 (b) Criteria of ffect and Adverse Effect". The constant vibrations,
noise, and air pollutio from the increasing h'igh volume of traffic is not
only destroying the p destrian environment in which the historic
commercial buildings pl y an important visual role, it is destroying the
buildings themselves. A econnaissance survey from the Downtown Historic
Survey, 1989, by Dr. Nor ne Roberts has identified this problem. Buildings are
leaning against one anoth r and the soft, stone brick buildings are eroding. A
good example of this is the Eagles Building (now Gaalaas Jewelry) leaning
against the Outfitters building. The Staples Block building marker is almost
to the point where it i unreadable due to the erosion from not only the rain
and winter winds but poll tion. The lift bridge, which is on the National
Register, will eventual y need rehabilitation due to the affects of cars and
trucks on the old bridge.
NO BUILD/TSM
The TSM options are u acceptable and would adversely affect Downtown
Stillwater according to 8 0.9 (b) (1) criteria of effect and adverse effect.
By upgrading the road s stems for vehicles, it contradicts the efforts by the
City of Stillwater to upg ade the Downtown for pedestrian movement. As in most ~
older communities, Stillwater was developed before the advent of automobiles. '
The TSM options would inc ease traffic through Downtown Stillwater thereby
increasing the pollutio , noise, and constant vibrations of traffic which
would adversely affect 01 er buildings as stated previously.
NO BUILD/REPLACEMENT ON SITE
Rep acement 0 the eXlstlng bridge does not alleviate the traffic situation in
Downtown Stillwater. Vehicles would still have to travel into the Downtown to
approach a new bridge. he same traffic problems as exist today would remain
and eventually become worse.
CENTRAL CORRIDOR
Of corridor options, the south corridor would have the least adverse affect on
downtown Stillwater. Although it may be viewed from the existing lift bridge
and possibly Lowell Park, it is quite a distance from the downtown area of the
St. Croix Riverway. Th relationship of Stillwater along the St. Croix
Riverway would not be altered.
LIFT BRIDGE
The disposition of the lift bridge must be identified as soon as a corridor
option is chosen. This bridge is a rare example of truss-lift bridge and is
symbol of Stillwater. It is an important historic element of the development
of Stillwater.
RECOMMENDATION: ~
Direct Staff to prepare a letter in response to the Section 106 Review Report. ..,
e
e
-
)
,
r ' lJ#f;
DRAFT SECTION 106 OOCUMENTATION:
STILLWATER-HOULTON RIVER CROSSING STUDIES
Minnesota Department of Transportation
October 11, 1990
e
e
-
...
. .
i I 'I
v
INTRODUCTION
The following information is supplied in order to initiate early
coordination and consultation, and meet the requirements of Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Much of the
information presented here is drawn from the Stillwater-Houlton
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), and a special study
which was completed on historic and archaeological impacts. The
DEIS describes the environmental impacts of three alternative
crossing corridors of the St. Croix River near Stillwater,
Minnesota, as well as the NO-BUILD alternatives (see figure 1). As
detailed in the DEIS, the current bridge and approaches no longer
meet the region~s transportation needs, in part because interstate
traffic is funneled through downtown Stillwater, which is poorly
equipped to handle such large volumes of traffic.
Since the DEIS was prepared, a draft National Register of Historic
Places Registration Form has been prepared towards nominating
portions of Downtown Stillwater as a National Historic District;
this Section 106 document takes into consideration this new
information.
In the DEIS, it was recommended that several BUILD alternatives not
be considered for further development unless additional supporting
information was received during the public hearing and comment
period. These include the North and South Corridor sub-aqueous
tunnel alternatives, the North Corridor bridge, and the Central
Corridor land tunnel option. Important reasons for this
recommendation were cost, adverse impacts on the St. Croix National
Scenic Riverway and adjacent natural environment, and potential
effects on historical and archaeological sites.
According to the criteria used in Section 106 effect determination,
the remaining alternatives have been determined to have no effect
on the area~s historical resources.
OVERVIEW OF STILLWATER-HOULTON AREA HISTORY *
The Lower St. Croix River Valley is an area with a rich Native
American and European-influenced cultural heritage. Well before
* Much of the information in this section has been adapted from two
documents, the Stillwater Downtown Plan: Committee Review Draft,
released in November, 1987, and Historical Reconstruction of the
Riverfront: Stillwater Minnesota, a study completed for the D. S.
Army Corps of Engineers in 1985 by Historical Research, Inc. and
John A. Fried Associated Architects and Engineers, Inc.
1
FIGtm.R 1
D F.l' RIS STony CORl/IlJolls
.. r \ ..
V
:t
cv
I:tJ
ST'IL.L.WAT'ER fOwNs,..p
~
-
-
,--
I I
I I_I
J J
I \
I '.,J
I_-
I
SOMERSET'
T'O~vt~SHlp
r--.
--------~~
ST. JOSEPH,r;;;j . .
T'OWNSHIP c..~,.,
. .;:-/
--..._- -I
I
I
I
I
I
8TlI. WATER
,--I-
I
I
I
I
co. RD. 12
I.li
;;,.
'"
uj
;;,.
oq:
I I~I
,-- I
8
o
o
~ -- -~
567 ~ '-\:::~~~i:~;~
. ~-".. .....'-...,..,."._,-"
OAK '......__.. "'''-''''':;,;.'C::~
...-----...-...........'>..:>-:"!."
PARK HEIGHT'S B' ~.....:..A..^....^~_..,:...~
.::75. ~.... .........'^...._. ~ '....\
.".... _..._,......"'J:.....~
.- ""-"-....--..,......-...A ~
"--..........._"............-"'0.,:. ~-"
~
~
-
".
.......... .
N RTH CORRIDOR
C NTRAl CORRIDOR
S UTH CORRIDOR
UTH TUNNEL
RTH TUNNEL
2
----
e
.,
.
l
e
.-
the time of European settlement, the land around Stillwater-Houlton
was used by Dakota and Ojibway Indians, who were removed from the
area as a result of treaties ratified in 1838. Stillwater was
founded in 1843, and is known as the "birthplace of Minnesota."
This title is a reference to the Territorial Convention which was
held in the city in 1848 to petition Congress for a new territory,
a move which reaul ted in the organization of the Minnesota
Territory a year later.
Stillwater grew rapidly during the last half of the nineteenth
century, fueled by its location on a navigable river and a great
lumber boom which began after the town * s first sawmill was
constructed in 1844. Logs from the vast forests to the north were
floated down the St. Croix River to Stillwater, where they were
removed from the water and processed into lumber at the city.s
mills. The lumber was then placed in the river again and floated
downstream to finishing mills on the Mississippi River. Today, the
Boom Site Wayside north of the city limits marks the point where
the logs were removed from the river.
e
In addition to helping support the lumber industry, the St. Croix
also provided a corridor for sternwheelers, which carried
passengers, goods, and mail up and down the river. Regular
steamboat service was available from Prescott and St. Paul up the
St. Croix as far as Taylor*s Falls. At this time, Stillwater was
the principal supply depo't for the entire St. Croix Valley.
Al though steam powered lumber mills were the most efficient,
Stillwater*s first mill utilized power from water flowing down from
Lake McKusick into the town. During the wet spring of 1852,
disaster struck when the Lake McKusick dam broke, sending a cascade
of mud and water down into the town, burying buildings. One
long-term effect of the flood was that more land was made available
for construction along the river, due to the accumulation of
sediment and debris. Sawdust from the mills was also used to build
up land along the river, a factor which even today contributes to
soggy foundations in the downtown area.
In the mid-nineteenth century, Stillwater had the distinction of
being the lumbering capital of Minnesota. However, the main
logging areas began to move further north in the 1860s, and the
output from mills in Minneapolis began to outdistance Stillwater*s,
which nonetheless continued to flourish.
e
The arrival of the railroad to Stillwater in 1871 diminished the
importance of steamboats and precipitated a major change in the
local economy. The mills shifted their emphasis from turning out
raw lumber to shingles, lathe barrels, and other finished wood
products. The wood-based economy was bolstered by the spin-off
development of breweries, foundries, masonries, retail outlets, and
manufacturing plants. The railroads greatly expanded the markets
3
. ' \
for Stillwater~s lumbe manufactured goods, making the city a
major wholesale distri ution point for northwestern Wisconsin and
northeastern Minnesota. When the Lumber Era economy peaked in the
1880s and 1890s, the pulation of Stillwater was an estimated
12,000, slightly less han the 1988 population of 13,485.
During the main Era period, lumber barons, bankers, and
business owners contri uted their resources to a wealth of new
construction. Numerous Victorian homes in the Federal, Italianate,
Greek Revival, Gothic, econd Empire, and Queen Anne styles rose on
the slopes back from he river. During this period, the wooden
clapboard commercial b ildings previously found in the Stillwater
downtown area were repl ced by structures in the Italianate, Gothic
and Greek Revival styl s, some with Queen Anne towers and bays.
After the turn of the c ntury, the Lumber Era in Stillwater quickly
declined. As logging ontinued to move further north, it became
uneconomical to tran port logs to the city for processing.
Additionally, the fr ntier pushed relentlessly westward, and
markets for the lumber became more distant. The last log passed
through the St. Croix om in 1914.
Because the economy of
Era, the city managed
timber industry~s dec
fortunes in lumber
manufacturing, wholesa
along the river, and S
passenger cars, farm
implements. Stillwa
agricultural machinery
to newly homesteaded 1
tillwater had diversified during the Lumber
to avoid becoming a ghost town after the
ine. Local entrepreneurs who had amassed
isely put capital into flour milling,
ing, and banking. Manufacturing plants rose
ill water became noted for producing freight
ngines, threshers, and other agricultural
er grew to be the largest producer of
in the region, shipping its products by rail
ds in the Dakotas and other plains states.
Homes built during thi period tended to be more practical and less
grand than those erec ed during the Lumber Era. New areas were
platted back from the central city which included homes in the
Bungalow, American Fo square, English Revival, Craftsman, Prairie,
and Princess Anne styl s. In the Commercial District, buildings in
the Classic Revival St Ie became common.
In conjunction with th
ci ty plan was complete
gardens, parks, and gr
located along the rive
City Beautiful Movement, Stillwater~s first
in 1918. The Movement ~ s emphasis on formal
en spaces is visible today in Lowell Park,
in the downtown area.
In 1931, the existing ift bridge opened for traffic, replacing a
wooden pontoon toll br"dge dating from 1876. The lift bridge has
long been a symbol of S illwater-Houlton, and was recently added to
the National Register f Historic Places (NRHP). According to the
NRHP inventory-nominat'on form submitted to the Minnesota Historic
Preservation Officer, he Stillwater-Houlton bridge "is associated
with events which have made a substantial contribution to the broad
4
r
,
e
e
e
e
.
e
'7
, i
. f
patterns of regional history, and embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a given style of construction."
Of the six vertical lift bridges existing in Minnesota and
Wisconsin before the Second World War, the Stillwater-Houlton
structure is one of three which remain. One of these (located at
Prescott, Wisconsin) will be torn down in the early 1990s. The
other (at Duluth Harbor) was rebuilt in the 1930s. Consequently,
the Stillwater-Houl ton bridge will soon be the only remaining
original example of a tower-and-cable, through-truss drawbridge in
Minnesota and Wisconsin. Aside from some necessary functional
modifications and repairs, the original integri ty of the lift
bridge has been preserved.
Stillwater~s Manufacturing Era ended with the Great Depression.
During the 1930s mills and manufacturing plants were demolished,
their former spaces along the river left vacant. By the 1940s the
population of the City had declined to a low of around 7,000.
In the 1950s, Stillwater began to revive. The Twin Cities were
growing, and the advent of the Automobile Era put Stillwater within
reasonable commuting distance of the metropblitan area. As a
result of growth during the 1960s and 1970s a number of impressive
old buildings were demolished in the downtown area, and many other
storefronts were remodeled. Perhaps the most notable loss was
Union Station, which was one of the most architecturally
significant train depots in Minnesota.
This period of change has come full-circle in recent years, with a
growing emphasis on historical preservation. Historic structures
which have been rehabilitated for new uses include the Freight
House Restaurant, the Old Post Office, the Staples Mill, and the
Grand Garage. A survey of historic structures in Downtown
Stillwater was recently completed, and there is a possibility that
portions of the central core could eventually become a National
Register Downtown Historic District. It has become increasingly
clear that historical resources are extremely important to
Stillwater~s present and future viability, making it an attractive
place to live as well as a popular destination for tourists.
HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
IN THE STILLWATER-HOULTON AREA
Federal laws and regulations require that harmful impacts to
important historical and archaeological resources be avoided,
minimized, or mitigated. Reconnaissance surveys _were conducted to
supplement the list of known sites and properties. As a result, a
number of historic and archaeological sites have been identified in
the vicinity of the new river crossing study corridors. During the
scoping process, care was taken to select study corridors which
avoided impacts on known historic resources.
5
1 ; '-
~
.
The majority of the sit s are located on the Minnesota side of the
St. Croix in Stillwat r, including eighteen historic sites and
standing structures wh'ch are listed on the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP. In addition, there are a number of
structures which have een listed in the Minnesota Inventory of
Historic Places. Mi esota also has five known archaeological
sites, one of which i listed on the NRHP. Major historic and
archaeological si tes re listed in the section below, and are
mapped in figure 2.
-
As mentioned previously work is in progress to declare portions of
downtown Stillwater a N tional Historic District. According to the
draft National Registe nomination form, the Stillwater Historic
Commercial District wo ld encompass much of the older section of
the downtown area, in luding 11 blocks in the central business
district. The area is oughly bounded by Second Street, Commercial
Avenue, East Nelson Str et, and the St. Croix River (see figures 3,
4, and 5). As propos d, the district contains 61 contributing
properties (including ne National Register property), and 19 non-
contributing propertie , all dating from the early 1860s to 1940.
In Wisconsin, a important archaeological site is
present in the North C which is one reason why this route
was dropped from fu ther consideration. A special report
summarizing archaeolog'cal survey work in the Wisconsin portion of
the study area was c mpleted in 1989 by the State Historical
Society of Wisconsin. Additional historical survey work will be ~
done in Wisconsin du ing the next year; based on available ..
information, it is ot anticipated that there will be any
discoveries which woul influence corridor selection.
(A. )
(B. )
(C. )
(D. )
(E. )
(F. )
(G. )
(H. )
(I.)
(3. )
(K. )
(L. )
(M. )
HISTORIC SITES/STANDING STRUCTURES
CURRENTLY ISTED ON THE NATIONAL REGISTER
Freight House and Depot, 233-335 Water St.
se, 416 South 4th St.
nks House, 504 South 5th St.
use, 1306 South 3rd St.
rison (old), Main at Laurel St.
use, 504 North 2nd St.
18 South 1st St.
y Highway 11.
mpany House and Barn, 9666 North St. Croix
C. M. and St. P.
Roscoe Hersey Ho
Captain Austin 3
Albert Lammers H
Minnesota State
Ivory McKusick H
Nelson School, 1
Pest House, Coun
St. Croix Boom
Trail.
St. Croix Boom S'te, TH 95 North, (National Historic
Landmark) .
St. Croix Lumber Mills/Stillwater Manufacturing Company, 318
North Main Stree .
William Sauntry ouse and Recreation Hall, 626 North 4th St.
and 625 North 5t St.
Stone Arch Bridg , off County Road 5.
e
6
< } t'..
,
e (N.)
(0. )
(P. )
(Q. )
(R. )
Henry Stussi House, 9097 Mendel Road.
Warden~s House, Minnesota State Prison (old), 602 North Main
St.
Washington County Courthouse, West Pine Street and South 3rd
St.
Mortimer Webster House, 435 South Broadway.
Stillwater-Houlton Lift Bridge
KNOWN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
(1.) Prehistoric Burial Mound.
(2.) Prehistoric Habitation Site.
(3.) Prehistoric Habitation Site.
(4.) Prehistoric Habitation Site.
(5.) Prehistoric Habitation Site, (listed on National Register).
(6.) Twin Springs Prehistoric Campsite
.
In addition to the sites listed above, there are a number of other
structures of historic significance, some of which might someday be
included on the National Register. According to the Section 106
criteria of effect, none of these structures are expected to be
affected by any of the BUILD or NO-BUILD alternatives. The
following list, which does not necessarily include all remaining
historic structures in the study area, was adapted from the 1987
Stillwater Downtown Plan: Committee Review Draft:
* Lowell Park and Pavilion
* Main Street, from Nelson to Commercial
* Old Post Office
* Lowell Inn
* Stillwater Gazette Building
* Piper, Jaffray, and Hopwood Building
* 106 East Chestnut
* Brick Alley
* Commander Elevator
* Lumber Exchange
* Vittorio~s
* Connolly Shoe Building
* 226 East Myrtle
* The Arlington
* Junior High School (South Hill)
* Various Homes and Churches
* Pioneer Park
* Stillwater Library
e
7
t ' ~ .t,:
.
FIGURE 2
NATIONAL REGI SITES AND STl'4JeTURES IN STIlDy AREA
(Se Key on Preceding Pages)
e
.....
..
10
10
c:i
10
Y"
X
4-
en
o
co. RD. 64
:.:
,',
.'.
.',
.:.
:::
::~ 80th ST. N.
N
1
@
(Q <V @
@
....
:.:.
....
....
'~I:
:::
"
'.
~:: C.S.A.H. 12
u1
~
~
,
~
o
e
8
, J
..
.
~
C:(
~
(f) ~
~
.\ ;
{:l.l
B
t)
-
FtGURE 4
APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF
STILLWATER NATIONAL HISTORIC COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
ST. enol x mVl!R
~
o
~
k ~"--
t !lh.~
~;:-II i a_ ". --------
n
~ (
-.. .
",TER
[[DI]] [lTI
-
~I; 111111 I
m-,
ITj]i~m"iHl) .
Source: Tntf:mr-live National Rel!lster
!illrvnv of Downtown flt-.i llwrlter.
Minnesota. Noreen Rober1;o. Ph.D..
IIiAtoricill Hesp.ilrch. Inc.. 1989.
l'inn 1 boundaries of district may
vary from thooo shown here.
-1i
HI
e
e
~
.-' -1""
II
$(<:00
Iii
!~:
ltlno 51.
r
fOUITK I.
~~I
frm 51.
\ \
I'jii1 0... TIle Nalklnal Reglsl<<
L.=.J 01 Hable Places
i
SI.
~-
I II. 1 ~......ttou..
1111 1lA.
hrlll I W'~'I~
, :::~':*
III ~ ~ Iii.-J~ ~ I
:= J-1 UIJ =..:/ U
\ I'
t;1--J
- t-:l . n\
ffiill~ITffiB
rnB.mo
-~)
I I
liT.
I
II
~
sr,
ti
Ii
ti
r
. .
e
e
e
"
.
FIGURE 5
STILLWATER CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
It
IMPACTS/EFFECTS
According to the cri te ia of effect for Section 106 evaluation
published in the Feder 1 Register (September 2, 1986,36 CFR, Part
800), "an undertaking h s an effect on a historic property when the
undertaking may alter characteristics of the property that may
qualify the property fo inclusion in the National Register." By
this definition, the s udy alternatives are eXpected to have no
effect on existing or tential National Register properties.
As mentioned previously the transportation departments recommended
in the DEIS that the t 0 sub-aqueous tunnel alternatives and the
North Corridor bridge ot be considered for further development.
Of the two remaining s udy corridors, the Central Corridor would
come closest to the lar est concentration of historical structures
in the study area. On National Register structure--the Mortimer
Webster House--is locat d on the bluff above TH 36, but is unlikely
to be directly affect d by a Central Corridor decision. The
Central Corridor would ot enter downtown Stillwater, but it would
be visible from Lowel Park, on the St. 8..r.oi~- waterfront.... - A
Central Corridor bridge has the potential to ~t't"p.~D~tles~tL:(n):~f'OI
the Stillwater Histori al District, which includes Lowell Park.
One of the most import t historical considerations in relatinnto_
a Central Corridor dec"sion would be the potential for e:rrects -OIl"
the existing bridge. The lift bridge would not be physically
impacted by a new cross ng, but the proximity of a new bridge could
have a negative visua impact. Two river crossings converging
across a relatively small area would produce a congested
appearance, diminishin the strong visual lines of the existing
bridge and reducing vie s from the historic Stillwater waterfront.
In spite of these conce ns, a Central Corridor crossing--or any of
the other BUILD alte natives--is not expected to affect the
drawbridge~s National egister status.
Based on current infor ation, the South cp~rirlor ~lignments would
have the least po ential for aff-ec't'l.Iig lhistorical and
archaeological resourc s. No notable historic or archaeological
sites are known to e ist in or adjacent to any of the South
Corridor alignments. new river crossing in the South Corridor
would, however, be visi Ie from the historic drawbridge, as well as
portions of the new Downtown Historic District, and has the
potential to subtly al er their setting.
The NO-BUILD alternati e includes three separate variations: No-
Action, Replacement-On Site, and Transportation System Management
(TSM) . The No-Action 0 tion consists of allocating no resources to
address the existing 0 future transportation problems, other than
continued maintenance; it is included in the analysis as a basis of
comparison for the oth r alternatives.
12
e
e
e
~ Replacement-an-Site does not address the transportation problem,
which is caused by the location rather than the condition of the
existing bridge. In addition to its potential for affecting the
future of the drawbridge, Replacement-On-Site ensures that large
volumes of interstate traffic will continue to flow through the
center of Downtown Stillwater, with potential adverse impacts on
the ambiance of the Historic District. Replacement-On-Site
represents a location decision without the need for immediate~
action, as the drawbridge has a lifespan estimated to be between
5-15 years, without major repair work.
The TSM options includes a range of partial solutions designed to
optimize the safety and service capabili ties of the existing
roadway system at relatively low cost. Examples include diverting
traffic away from Stillwater (e.g., to the 1-94 crossing at Hudson,
Wisconsin), reducing the number of trucks on the study corridor, or
changing traffic flow patterns in downtown Stillwater.* Of these,
the latter is of the most significance from the perspective of
historical preservation.
-
Altering traffic patterns in downtown Stillwater could include a
combination of alternatives such as limiting on-street parking,
increasing road width and number of lanes, improving turning radii
at corners, and creating one-way traffic flows on Chestnut and/or
Main. Potential impacts of these alternatives include less on-
street parking in the downtown area and effects on pedestrian
movement.
I f Main Street were converted to a southbound one-way route,
northbound traffic could be directed to Water Street. Of the
downtown TSM options, the one-way pair alternative has the greatest
potential for indirect impacts on a future Historic District.
Water Street offers only 48 feet between buildings; this would
provide for just two 14 foot lanes, with 10 foot sidewalks on each
side. Converting Water Street to a northbound interstate route
would mean much more traffic in the vicinity of the Freight House
and Lowell Park. Pedestrian movement in the area would be
disrupted, truck deliveries would become more difficult, and the
visibility of some businesses could be altered.
TSM is not considered to be a principal, long-term solution to the
local and regional traffic problems, which require a new crossing
to be adequately addressed. However, TSM efforts in downtown
Stillwater could be useful as an interim measure to reduce
congestion until a new crossing can be constructed. In addition,
long-term TSM measures in the downtown area could help manage on-
e
* Mn/DOT has produced several reports on these TSM options which
include more detailed information than is included here.
13
going traffic increase By the year 2014, forecasts indicate that .~
traffic volumes on Mai Street will be at least as high as today, ~
even if a new crossing is constructed.
Collectively, the NO-B ILD options have the potential for the most
serious long-term ad erse impacts on Stillwater~s historical
character. The noise, air pollution, and congestion created by an
increasingly high vol e of vehicular traffic through downtown
Stillwater threatens he atmosphere the ci ty is attempting to
preserve. Removing thr ugh traffic from downtown Stillwater--which
is a major aim of all the BUILD alternatives--would help protect
the historical values f the city. However, it is not anticipated
that the NO-BUILD al ernatives will threaten the existing or
potential National R gister status of any structures in the
downtown area, or jeop dize the potential listing of Stillwater~s
National Historic Comm rcial District.
The future use of lift bridge will be affected by a
BUILDjNO-BUILD decisio . However, it is a separate issue, as none
of the BUILD alternat"ves require that the existing structure be
removed. If a decisio is made to construct a new crossing, Mn/DOT
and Wisc/DOT will i i tiate a separate public decision-making
process on the old bri ge at some point in the future.
In the event of a ne crossing, state trunk highway designation
will be removed fro the old structure, and state funding ~.
discontinued. After t e existing bridge has been declared unsafe, ..,
or continued operatio is considered impractical, the structure
will either be remove or rehabilitated for local transportation
use _ In the event 0 ership is transferred to another party,
restrictions or condi ions would be included in the agreement to
ensure the preservat" on of the property~s significant historic
features.
MITIGATION
At this time, no igation for historical impacts is being
proposed. Most poten ial conflicts with cultural resources have
already been avoided; the location of historic and archaeological
sites was an important factor early in the study corridor selection
process, when the p esent corridors were chosen for further
analysis.
If there is BUILD dec"sion, the precise corridor alignment of the
selected alternative will be determined. Any historical
and/archaeological im acts resulting from the selected route will
be analyzed in detail "n the final EIS; at that time, any specific
mitigation will also e discussed.
e
14
e
e
e
If it is necessary to remove the existing bridge at some point in
the future, the mitigation procedures will follow those set forth
in Section 106.
PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS/COORDINATION
The appendix included with the Historical and Archaeological
Impacts Special Study documents primary coordination activities
which occurred prior to publication of the draft EIS. Subsequent
to draft EIS publication, information meetings and a public hearing
were held. Potential impacts to historical resources in the area
were an important part of this process, and are reflected in the
oral and written comments which were derived from the DEIS comment
period.
During the hearing, substantial comments on historical impac~s were
received by the Stillwater-Heritage Preservation Commission, the
Preservation Alliance, and the City of Stillwater, in particular.
The Stillwater-Heritage Preservation Commission is on record as
supporting a South Corridor bridge, which "would have the least
effect on the historic resources of downtown Stillwater." The
Preservation Alliance "opposes the NO-BUILD option, because of the
historic designation of the commercial district in downtown
Stillwater." The Alliance also asked that the Central Corridor not
be considered "because of the intense use and the intrusiveness of
the Central Corridor plan on the historic district in downtown
Stillwater." The City of Stillwater submitted extensive oral and
written comments, much of which pertained to historical
preservation issues. In brief, the City supports a South Corridor
decision, with retention of the existing drawbridge. The City has
serious concerns about the impact of the Central Corridor and NO-
BUILD alternatives on downtown historical resources.
There is strong support for a BUILD alternative from most local
governments in the study area. The majority of governments which
have stated a corridor preference favor the South Corridor.
According to a questionnaire passed out at the public information
meetings and hearing, 63.9 percent of the respondents favor a BUILD
decision, while 32.5 percent support NO-BUILD and 3.6 percent are
uncertain. Of the respondents favoring a BUILD decision, 84.9
percent support the South Corridor.
Agency comments have been varied. From the perspective of
historical preservation, one of the most significant themes has
been insistence from the agencies which manage the St. Croix
National Scenic Riverway (the Department of Interior, and the
Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources) that the
existing bridge be removed if a new crossing is constructed. One
reason stated for this argument is that because the St. Croix River
is a National Scenic Riverway, a proliferation of crossings must be
15
avoided. This remains an unresolved issue between the two state e
DOTs and the agencies hich manage the Riverway.
Following the DEIS pub ic comment period, additional consultation
regarding Section 106 esPOnsibilities occurred between the
Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Minnesota Historical
Society. This consult tion will continue.
-
--
16
.- ~
',., .\
.. ....
~ .
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
MIDWEST REGION
1709 JACKSON STREET
OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102.2571
.- -
- .
IN REPLY REFER. TO:
e
e
L7619 (MWR-PQ)
ER 90/354
SEP 1 1 1990
Mr. Charles Foslien
Division Administrator, Federal
Highway Administration
7th and Robert Streets, Suite 490
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Dear Mr. Foslien:
As promised at the Hudson, Wisconsin, "Stillwater Bridge Meetings" of August
22 and 23, the following elaboration on the National Park Service's (NPS)
views as part of the Department of the Interior's July 10 coa~ents on the
draft environmental document for this proposed project are provided. Please
note that we do not pretend to speak unilaterally for our Department, rather
to provide some clarification of our own thinking as it pertains to the
aforementioned comments.
.t
The U.S. Department of the Interior's preferred alternative for the proposed
Stillwater-Houlton crossing is the no-build alternative. This is defined as
the institution of intensive traffic system management (TSM) measures, the
maintenance of the existing historically significant lift bridge for the safe
life qf the bridge. and rehabilitation (or reconstruction) of the old bridge.
The National Park Service has stated both publicly and privately that it
remains unconvinced that this alternative is inadequate to meet the project's
objectives; we have also acknowledged that it is the Federal and State Highway
Agencies who have the technical expertise to determine both what constitutes
an acceptable level of use on the existing bridge and whether or not a
combination of TSM measures can achieve such a level of use.
If TSM measures cannot solve existing and projected problems and a decision is
made to construct a new crossing (a build decision), the Department has
recommended that the old bridge be removed. This recommendation is based to a
large degree on the National Park Service's professional judgement in its
areas of expertise, including natural and cultural resources management,
recreation and visitor use management, and interpretation of its mandates
under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and the National Park Service's 1916
Organic Act. We believe that the position we advocate is consistent with
earlier NPS documents such as the Statement for Management and the Lower Saint
Croix Master Plan, both of which received public review and comment prior to
their approval.
It is stated on page 2 of the Lower Saint Croix Master Plan that "The major
purpose of the master plan is to balance the need for recreational use of the
area against the equally important objective of the preservation of the
~
2
e
natural values of the area.' Thus, the overall goal of the plan is to
"preserve the existing scen'c and recreational resources of the Lower St.
Croix River through control ed development."
This statement has been int rpreted by the managing agencies to mean we will
preserve those values of th riverway as they existed in 1976. Not only do
the managing agencies recog ize this need, so do local governments as
demonstrated by their estab ishment of zoning ordinances.
Our interest in the non-proliferation of bridges across the Saint Croix is
grounded in our concern for maintaining the same type of viewshed that existed
when the Riverways were est blished. This position, however, is also
supported by a consideratio of the history of the river valley and we view
our position as one developed to protect both the natural and cultural
landscape thereof. Our rationale is-as follows.
From the historical viewpo'nt there has not been a proliferation of bridges
throughout the St. Croix Ri er Valley. In the early days many ferries crossed
the St. Croix up and down the river valley. As the need for ferries
decreased, their operations ceased and traffic was rerouted to bridge
crossings. I~ Stillwater, the ferry crossing that was about 900 feet above
(north) of the present bri ge was. replaced by a floating pontoon bridge in
1876. The pontoon bridge as located i~~ediately downstream from the present
bridge and remained in ope ation until replaced by a toll-free lift bridge in
1931.
e
History shows us that othe bridges, such as the Osceola and Taylors Falls
bridges, were removed once new ones were built. The present Taylors Falls
bridge is the fifth one bu'lt in the same general area as the first four.
It is the lack of bridges
This is especially true in
Croix in the State-adminis
Hudson and Prescott are in
multitude of bridges found
Cities area.
It is stated on page 6 of
co~~unities along the Lowe
flavor should be encourage
historic character." Two
setting of the region. Ob
great impact upon an histo
in this portion of the riv
character of the region wo
long the St. Croix that makes it unique and scenic.
the more heavily populated portion of the Lower St.
ered zone. The existing bridges at Stillwater,
our view a pleasing visual contrast to the
on the Mississippi and Ninnesota Rivers in the Twin
he Lower Saint Croix Master Plan, ". . . all
St. Croix that still retain some of the historical
in their effort to maintain their cultural and
ridges would be a definite change in the historical
iously the removal of the lift bridge would have
ic structure, however, by retaining only one bridge
rway, the impact to the cultural and historic
ld be minimized.
Although an historical str cture would be lost, removal of the bridge would
enhance the historic chara ter of Stillwater by eliminating traffic congestion ~.
and noise caused by the pr sent bridge. In fact we question whether retention
. ..~.
e
e
e
3
and operation of the existing bridge would solve the congestion problems this
project was initiated to address, and hope that the Final Environmental
Statement will address that issue in more detail.
Non-proliferation of bridges also appears to be supported by Minnesota law, as
indicated in a statement to the Voyageurs Region National Park Association in
a memorandum dated December 8, 1987, from Byron Starns (copy enclosed). It is
stated on page 3 of this memorandum, "The legal issue raised by the selection
of a corridor for a new St. Croix Bridge is the non-proliferation doctrine.
This doctrine has been established through a series of decisions by the
Minnesota Supreme Court. It requires projects which adversely affect the
environment to be placed in previously disturbed locations rather than
pristine sites so that damage to the State's environmental resources is not
proliferated by a series of projects over time."
Other references relevant to this determination can be found in both the Lower
Saint Croix Master Plan and the 1987 Saint Croix Statement for Management. It
is stated on pages 5 and 6 of the 1976 Master Plan, "Proposals for new bridge
crossings, renovation of existing structures or powerline and pipeline
crossings should be reviewed in advance by the administering agencies to
ensure the scepic and recreational values are protected." It is indicated on
page 15 of the Statement for Management that "Future land uses which would be
considered non-compatible with the goals of the Rivelvay include: additional
bridges or expanded highway rights-of-way across St. Croix River."
We look toward working with you further in project planning. Please feel free
to call Associate Regional Director David Given (402-221-3082/864-3082) or
Environmental Protection Specialist Terry Cederstrom (402-221-3485/ 864-3485)
of my staff if you have further questions.
Sincerely,
~tutljJ ~,
Edward D. Carlin
Acting Regional Director
Enclosure
4
e
cc:
Mr. Anthony L. Andersen
Superintendent, Saint Croix
National Scenic Riverway
P.O. Box 708
St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin 4024
Mr. Frank M. Mayer
Division Administrator, Fede al
Highway Administration
4502 Vernon Boulevard
Madison, Wisconsin 53705-49 5
Dr. Nina M. Archabal
Director, Minnesota Historic 1 Society
Fort Snelling History Cente
St. Paul, Minnesota 55111
Dr. H. Nicholas Muller III
Director, State Historical Society
816 State Street
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Mr. William Franz
Chief, Environmental Review Branch
U.S. Environmental Protecti n Agency
230 South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60604
e
Hr. James H. Harrison
Chairman, Minnesota-Wiscons n
Boundary Area Commission
619 Second Street
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016-15 6
Hr. William M. Crawford
District Engineer, Minnesot
of Transportation--Metro
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Department
istrict
Mr. Gregory J. Piette
District Director, Wisconsi
Department of Transportat on
District 8
P.O. Box 429
Superior, Wisconsin 54880
e
e
e
e
J
- . ~
.
5
Ms. Sheila Minor Huff
Regional Environmental Officer
u.s. Department of the Interior
Room 3422
230 South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Mr. Jonathan Deason
Director, Office of Environmental Affairs
U.S. Department of the Interior
Room 2357
18th and C Streets, NW
Washington, D.C. 20240
bcc:
WASO-400
WASO-774
WASO-762
MWR-State Coordinators, Minnesota & Wisconsin
MWRO-PEQ (Cederstrom); CRM (Ketterson); Natural Resources (Hiebert)
f ."'~
-'
L
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
l
I
I,
I
I
~
,-
.. __ ..... "--0- ~... __ _. .._. __ __ __ __ ._ ___.______._.__. ____. _.
I .
e
I
e
e
.."r-...
~
~ '" .~._~,.,<a~
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this report ie to analyze potential traffic system
management (TSM) ideas to improve traffic flow through downtown
Stillwater. The main focal point of Stillwater~s congestion
. problem is the signalized intersection of Chestnut and Main
Streets, located two blocks west of the existing drawbridge.
TSM efforts in downtown Stillwater could be useful as an interim
measure to reduce congestion until a new crossing can be
constructed. In addition, long-term TSM measures could prove
helpful in managing on-going traffic increases, even if a new
crossing is constructed. However, TSM is not considered to be a
principal, long-term solution to the local and regional
transportation traffic problema, which require a new river
crossing to be adequately addressed.
Currently, average weekday peak hour volumes exceed the capacity
of the Chestnut and Main intersection, which provides a level of
service of F, with vehicle delays of up to 2 minutes. (Level of
service D is considered to be the minimum acceptable level.) The
situation is much worse on summer weekends, when traffic volumes
are up to 25 percent higher. Some of the main problema at this
intersection are as follows (see figure 1):
* On westbound Chestnut, there is a large volume of traffic
which turns left onto Main. Compounding the problem is the
fact that the length of the two westbound lanes on Chestnut
are restricted by the two lane drawbridge, while the width
of the roadway is restricted by buildings on either side.
* On eastbound Chestnut (west of intersection), there are
three possible movements from one lane. Parking on both
sides of Chestnut restricts the capacity.
- .
* On northbound Main, the right turn lane is limited by on-
street parking. . South of the restricted parking area, both
northbound (to TH 95) and eastbound (to Wisconsin) traffic
is restricted to one lane each.
* The presence of a significant number of pedestrians leads
to additional restrictions on the traffic flow in downtown
Stillwater, especially during the summer.
The following sets of alternatives attempt to address these
deficiencies, resulting in different benefits and disadvantages.
As detailed in the Stillwater-Houlton Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, some of these alternatives have already been studied
in detail by the City of Stillwater and/or the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, beginning in the 1960s. Appendix A
in this report includes comments submitted to Mn/DOT which
review, among other things, Stillwater~s views on TSM and
downtown traffic problema.
~
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
ALTERN TlVES WHICH MAINTAIN A TWO-WAY
I ATE TRAFFI C J!lDW ON MAIN STRImT
.
Three principal alt rnativea were analyzed to improve the
capacity of exist streets without altering the two-way traffic
flow on Main Street. Some of the ways the capacity of existing
streets might be im roved include increasing road width and
number of lanes, im oving turning radii at corners, and
restricting parking _ Converting a portion of Chestnut to one-way
traffic ia also an 0 tion.
The extent of road w possible in downtown Stillwater ia
restricted by buildi s and the need to maintain sidewalks of an
acceptable width. I theory, Main Street could be widened to a
maximum of four lane (14/12/12/14 feet), which would result in a
reduction of sidewal width on each side of the road from 11 feet
to 7 feet. Chestnut could have a maximum of four 12 foot lanes,
with 6 foot sidewalk. However, these sidewalk widths are
considered less than acceptable due to the large number of
pedestrians in downt wn Stillwater. Consequently, the revisions
described below util ze parking limitations, turn restrictions,
and/or one-way traff c flows on\Chestnut to improve capacity:
* Revision A prohib ts left turns from eastbound Chestnut and
extends the right t n lane on northbound Main south to Nelson
Street (see figure 2 _ Eastbound traffic on Chestnut would be
able to turn_left on block east at 2nd Street. Extending the
right turn lane on M in would result in the lOBS of 15 on-street
parking places.
* Revision B incor
l~its parking on Ch
eastbound Chestnut t
right turn lane, due
the intersection. I
from westbound Chest
new lane made _availa
the changes made above, but further
and Main (aee figure 2). Traffic on
ning right onto Main would be able to use a
to more limited parking south and west of
addition, traffic turning right onto Main
ut would also be able to take advantage of a
Ie by parking restrictions.
* Revision C remove . eastbound vehicles from Chestnut between
Main and 2nd Street, improving the signal phasing (see figure 3).
A disadvantage of this option is that it increases traffic
volumes at the inters ction of Myrtle and Main, one block to the
north _ Left turns fr m southbound Main to eastbound Chestnut
will also increase wi h this option.
Revisions A through C
problem for average
weekend traffic, when
significantly higher.
configuration is rate
Revisions A, B, and C
do not solve the intersection traffic
ekday traffic; they do even less for summer
vehicle volumes and pedestrian traffic are
As depicted in table 1 below, the present
at level of service F, the failure level.
provide successively better results.
2
-~ ..
e
e
e
...~....
e
I
~
I.
I
.', .....
~
"
TABLE 1
TSM REVISIONS IN DOWNTOWN STILLWATER:
twO-WAY TRAFFIC ON MAIN STREET
(Average Weekday Traffic)
Configuration Level of Service/Vehicle Delay in Seconds
1989 1994 1999 2004
Present * * * *
Revision A E/42 E/56 * *
Revision B D/38 E/51 * *
Revision C D/27 D/32 E/51 *
\
<*) Failure--worse than level of service F. Vehicle delay is an
average computed for all vehicles entering the intersection.
However, even the most successful revision (C) attains a level of
service F by the year 2004.
ALTERNATIVES WHICH CONVERT MAIN STREET TO ONE-WAY TRAFFIC FLOW
It is possible to improve traffic flow at the Chestnut/Main
intersection by restricting Main Street to one-way, southbound
traffic. One-way streets improve capacity by reducing turning
movements at intersections (thereby improving signal timing),
without the need to widen lanes or add new ones. Main Street
would remain as it is now (10/12/12/10 feet), with 11 foot
sidewalks.
Conceivably, northbound traffic which formerly utilized Main
could be routed on to Water Street or the railroad right-of-way
(both located between Main and the river). Second Street, which
is located west of Main Street, is not considered a candidate for
one-way pairing due to topography.
All of the one-way pair alternatives investigated here would
result in larger socia-economic impacts than revisions A through
C, which maintained two-way traffic flow on Main. The Water
Street alternate would, for example, require the acquisition of
the grain elevator or feed store located south of Nelson Street,
in addition to the lOBS of considerable parking spaces.
Pedestrian movement in the downtown area would also be altered.
3
I
I
Alternatives which
potential for aubst
Stillwater. A sign
the process of bein
District; the City
impact of large tra
cultural resources
'appendix B). The F
between the railroa
on the National Reg
adversely affected
I
I
I
I
In part because of
geometric constrain
make them difficult
offers only 48 feet
for just two 14 foot
There would be no ro
deliveries would bec
I
I
mploy one-way traffic pairings hold the
tial impacts to the historical resources in
ficant portion of downtown Stillwater is in
nominated as a National Historic Commercial
expressed concerns about the potential
fie volumes on the integrity of existing
d the future historical district (see
eight House Restaurant, which is located
tracks and Water Street, is presently listed
ster of Historic Places and could be
y these alternatives.
istorical concerns, there are serious
s with the one-way alternatives which would
to implement. Water Street, for example,
tween building faces; this would provide
lanes, with 10 foot sidewalks on each side.
m for on-street parking, and truck
me much more difficult.
The one-way alternat ves (revisions D and E) which utilize Main
and Water Streets fo southbound and northbound traffic,
respectively, are as follows (see figure 4):
I
I
* Revision D utiliz
to revision A, with
traffic on Main. P
restriction.
I
* Revision E conver
way, similar to revi
entering the Chestnu
instead of the four
directions remain on
must continue carryi
bridge.
I
I
As depicted in figur
of Main and Nelson w
access to Water Stre
onto Water Street wo
Brick Alley parking
utilize the same Che
figure 4 (revisions
. of the grain elevato
elevator route would
eliminate additional
The operation of rev
intersection would n
traffic to Water Str
s Chestnut movements which are most similar
ewer turns possible because of one-way
king along Main is permitted without
s Chestnut west of Main to a westbound one-
ion C. This change will result in vehicles
;Main intersection from only two directions~
t present. However, three destination
southbound Main, as Chestnut (east of Main)
g two-way traffic to maintain access to the
4, the feed store at the southeast corner
uld be acquired in order to provide better
t. Another way to route northbound traffic
ld be to use the land south and east of the
ot (see figure 5). This alternate would
tnut and Main configurations illustrated in
and E), but WQuld require the acquisition
instead of the feed store. The grain
improve access to Water Street, but would
parking spaces south of the Brick Alley.
sions D and E at the Chestnut and Main
t be affected by the route chosen to direct
et.
4
I:' .""
10-
,.
e
.
e
1I -AI
~ '"
II
II
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
It
I
I
~
I
I
I
-
I
f'
I
As indicated in table 2, revision E provides a level of service
of C for average weekday traffic through 1999, the best of any of
the alternatives analyzed in this report. It is estimated that
revision E would provide acceptable levels of service for average
weekday traffic until the year 2004.
It is important to note that both of these alternatives are less
successful in addressing average summer weekend traffic at the
intersection. Revision E is estimated to exceed level of service
D on weekends around the year 2000.
TABLE 2
TSM REVISIONS IN DOWNTOWN STILLWATER:
ONE-WAY PAIRING
(Average Weekday Traffic)
Configuration Level of Service/Vehicle Delay in Seconds
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
Present * * * * * *
Revision D D /30 D/35. E/55 F/8B * *
Revision E C/16 e/18 C/23 D/31 E/46 *
c*) Failure--worse than level of service F. Vehicle delay is an
average computed for all vehicles entering the intersection.
Another possible alternative would be to use the railroad right-
of-way for one-way northbound traffic (see figure 6). (A
variation of this option would be to maintain two-way local
traffic on Main Street while routing two-way interstate traffic
next to the railroad tracks--see figure 7). With the rail line
alternative, less than 50 feet would be available for a new road,
permitting only two 14 foot lanes. Up to 150 parking spaces
could be lost with the railroad alternative. Due to access needs
of the Minnesota Railroad Museum (located north of Chestnut), the
railroad tracks must remain in place, necessitating an
inconvenient, acute angle road crossing.
The railroad option has the potential for severe impacts to
neighboring Lowell Park, which is a heavily used recreation site
and part of the proposed historical district. Access to the park
would become more difficult, and visitors would be subjected to
increased noise and air quality impacts from vehicles using the
railroad right-of-way.
5
\.
Another important co
Park would need to b
Use of this parkland
Administration~s Sec
alternative which af
Register sites may
ufeasible and pruden
..
sideration is that some land from Lowell
acquired to develop the railroad option.
would invoke the Federal Highway
ion 4 (f) criteria; under Section 4 (f)p an
ects significant parkland or National
selected only if there is no other
U alternative.
Downtown Stillwater epends heavily on historical and
recreational resourc s for its economic base, and impacts to
these amenities coul have serious consequences for downtown
businesses. Because of social, economic, historical, and
parkland impacts, use of the railroad is not considered to be an
acceptable alternati Compared to the railroad option, use of
Water Street in a one way pairing with Main would produce fewer
adverse impacts and r suIt in the same traffic improvement.
None of the alternati
to being a primary so
downtown Stillwater.
year 2014 for average
of F would be reached
In addition to not pr
transportation proble
have varying adverse
businesses, parkland,
pair option, in parti
Stillwater waterfront
House. Impacts would
right-of-way alternat
The principal utility
Stillwater would be t
congestion on an inte
addition, they might
Stillwater manage gro
new river crossing.
there will be more tr
currently, even if a
CONCLUSION
es discussed in this analysis comes close
ution to the transportation problem in
Even the best option would fail before the
weekday traffic; a level of service rating
earlier for heavier summer weekend traffic.
a satisfactory solution to the
of 'the downtown TSM options would
on parking, access, pedestrians,
and/or historical resources. The one-way
ular, would have an adverse impact on the
and -the area around the historical Freight
be particularly severe with the railroad
ve.
of the TSM study alternatives in downtown
e possibility of reducing traffic -
im basis before a new bridge is built. In
rove useful as long-term measures to help
ing traffic volumes in conjunction with a
y the year 2014, forecasts indicate that
ffic in downtown Stillwater than there is
ew bridge is constructed.
6
..
" ..
e
e
e
e
"
"
0-
" '<11-
e
,
,
"
"
"
"
"
'\.
"
"
"
"
"
"
,
~
,'-^ '"
.. .~~
c3 ~
~~
,.,.. .
~
1
,
\
\
\
,
, ;
'"
,",
. ,
,
\
\
\
\
, .
,
, ,
, ,
. ,
,
,
,
,
',0
,
,
,
I .
,
, ,
, ,
,
,
..'
- ......
..,.
,
,
,
. ,
:A
, ,/,~
, \,'
~"
,
,
"
0,
, "
,
'\.
,
,
......,
k
:;
,
,
,
.' ,
,0'
, ,
'" .
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.Q
,
,
,
,
...
I
,
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
-,
,....
I
I I
I ..
. , '
. ..I
.
.
1-'
I
. I'
I ~
I I
I ,
...
,
,
,
,
......
. ...
.........'
,
,
,
\' , , ;
... t
... ...
....
... ...
... ...
... ...
... ...
I
,
,
,
\
0'
I
I
,
I ,
;\
..................
...................
\
,......,
I
...
. .....~
\
\
I
,
I I
I I
.,q
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
...
"'1
I
,
I
I .
. I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
.
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
'\.
,
,
I
I
,
,
,
,
A\
_...--
---
---
,.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
o
o
.---
-....-
---
,,--
.--
-
~
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
.
I
I
.
.
.' t ,
II . .
.
. . .
, I
. .
. --.
,
. I
. .
.
. I
. ,
. ,
.
.
,
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~\\\\\
.--
,
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
::0 .
.
....-\ .
.
9 t ·
I
. -I 1
1 .
1.1
.
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
~o
l-
0:::
\... 0"\
~S
~WAL
\
\
\-
,.:. -, l
. . oJ
. aNt..
. /}. '(
, '14
,
I
,
... '
......
.........
......'
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
;.~,... ,......"
,.,-. ..." r
., 0 \
aNt.., . tf\ \
,'I " '( . \ f11 ,
~l~' \ \
, "
\ '\
" ,
,
"
,
,
...
,
'...--,'
,
,
,
I
'.........,
'\
'\
'\
'\
I
,
,
I
,
I
.
.
1
,
..r y
\
,
.
...
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
\
, ... ... ... "'(
\ ,
.
,
,
,
,
I
I
,
\
\
\
\
...
,
,
\
I
...
...
,
\
I
,
,
,
~-_!-
--
....
",'"
"
.
1
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
o
.. ..- ,-....-
-.',.,."" ..
--.._1 .....
-:::--,.;
,
... I
...
c::=:> Lu .>-
~~
...
~... -.
---......
..--_. ---...
-.. """ -..
- -,
\ .
"
t"" - -'
01
-_..-- ............
w ·
tf)\-
02
-'W
<..)
t-
Z
W
----------
-----------------
..----0-"'''-
6
<J---------------{1------
\ - ~
\
\
\
\
1
\
\
1
1
\
,
\
,
1
1
\ -' ".~ '~"i
.,Y ,.
:-.,j,,;<. ~
1:, J,,~::~f~_< " .-:~ -
.~.~ -.. ......J.1~;~;,
~ _' ~~~~'f[-
~ .." ..,.,-."",,,?,Hl-; 'I-:'~'"""'~. /,._,,;
... ./, ,.
\' ,--'
(}
,
.,
9'
r_-...---
13'
11'
11'
13'
1
o t\
z 1
<::(" ,
-' I
tf) 1
H '
I
,
,
,
1
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
1
\
...
....
9' we\k
,
~,
,
,
I'"
I
,
,
1
,
1
1
,
I
1
1
,
\
,
I
-'
.
I
i
!
~_~~j-o~
o
..----- ----.
----.
..-..-- ..---
~~ \ \ \ , =
, -.J \ \
~
~
,- - -- -
- -- ... -.
..-..... ...-,
9'
....-........-....... ....-....
13'.,~
,.>,),', ~":,~;...,:\;..
.1;:..');: .".~._."..'.'_..""~-.-,.,..-.,,-.."~,f.,
,;.~,'lt.l'
,;;'~k'" 131
. ~"'frj;,:~*Jp_
._;,,;...<;..t--.-
.~..~'._;:;-j.'/t."'" '
;,.Jrl.:,'.,~: '.'.
--- - --
9' walk
.
.
wt
.,--. ...0". "
.----
~:;
\.
..
..
,
,
,
1
.. ... -,-.
,
,
1
,
,
\
."
l
,:. ;.:~~;;.-:~ ~~;>'"~,~.
-~--- :;
e
It
e
.. ....
'";1...
...~
4
-~
'!
+
_..4' ..... <(
~4
:' " I/~~-//'",/'"
" ,. P"6"gg../,/' ,,' ,...-
I ':J I . , , ".-
.' ~.~/!~/;6~/,/
,
,
.
aaa.a .,..
.'"IV' UIIW.u . .a.... ~'I.
=
.(0
--
. ~ ~.::-:--
. ,~ii~~~~=~:~;~~=~~~~
~
.N
~
, , ,
: ,'//(///
~ 'II'
'17[' \'
I I I . f I I '
i~::/i:I'.':'
,.". I~<li'
\': ~~~' I
,. ~--, ,
. ....~~.1
-----
"Y..A.~
~
...
...
~
-
i
I
.. "..j,I . '___0,&
If:nRII ....0.:.."' .'I~ . .... .'IM4OJ.
.a..... aD..
AaQ4 .l"~
l.tII.l "'a.10"~. IAWI
~~~- A':' ",,~ ....J..l..dI
~
a.IU.:IIn&U .O"W..I_
."tON... . w..I. lIIIO""
Q
-+-c:-
aN~~~l
...
I'
.1
Ii
.1
I
......
'.
'''''''0
.....,.!"~
'.oO'OlE- M.~;
"
,
,
:~
It..
~ .685'
...-,...
-l-i
:V~
'r':
. ..i
....
J';'~
. j' ."
.c. ~~.
-p-" ... -.
-:If.: J. .-~'
.! ~<
tt.; -
Ii ..
.~
I
I
\ :,
\ \ .,.
4-:;---
'. , \
'. , " "
, '
'f:-~~~'
......,;""\ ~
---"
I"'-~'" .
! -,',
. I , ....
,.-....\.'\.' '..
( ,....... "-
I ; I . -...:
I '" .
-
--4
!~
...
-.
, '.
:rf
I",:
; ~. J'
: ~ l-
.'J t .,I.~=I
J .
)~.. i
... .., .
I
':
1
~
D
M.8~ .0' .us
.an8
[] i
.
,
\
I
I
-",
~
...
":
'"
...
.. , ,
~ , ,
... . ,
....
....
, .
-.
, .
".
I
. ,
'.
,
.
"
0:
~
,
, ,
\
I
.
t
,
,
,
I
.
l
.
:
@
f
~
:, ' ,
i 1 ~ ~ 'f
i I : "
. I I
,: \ 1 I I
.. I"
), , I
-"~ ).;.~"
J : : ...<-. 4~!
I ~... - -. .<~ '. .~:! / · ;'. i / :~;;;
....._: .....r ....:?{f ~;-- ~::~ JJ :~~".'~;I1i.
rr p-=- :..:: - ~ ~ 'ot( :~ ~~. ,/
, . I ~ . ~ - - ',~ ~~'- i ~ "-
;~.q~., ~1~~ - ;:: ~~,~ ~~'f~f~~-~':~~ ~=._-
'V ~~~"G~
I I \ \ '" '\..
PUZ9, ,. <l 00; .'
, I I
-'
I
; f I.i-~: -
, I
I., r-~~-
~: 1 ~
I '
l~
....1::~i-!f;~;;(,: I
./_',',.., I
.. ..,"t .
: I>....:.. _,-.-...
.. I ~ I.',': i'
,''''''''o.l..-
. ::'~r"
I :,'1.1....
I ..: 'I; ~ ...40_....
;; ':: i "'.....
,tl': 'j
" I,',
,";'1 .
I
I
,
"l I
r \11'
, i j
1: i;~:f;;;:;;::<~, .~~
"I ~! ':::..01'
. , '.'\ 1 .'~"-
" \ ' '" -;r.-~ ..-....
"';:'\~~jJ~} ~
"
.:.; t.1..; r;
~r ;:.
\
1\
"
1..
"_ llzt-- 3.~C .6C ;88N
'" "
z' ,
Q' ,
. \,\, ,
- """ \ \
..., ' \
Q,
"'I,
~I
I "
/
o
:...... ' - .
m .....~LH Pf .88'" .
'", , \
-4 ,
I
"
L ~
"'\C--- 3:~pC '.BSN" ,
. . ,
'v ...~/
c-____---,..~--.-.. ~
,
....,~
I -, .
\
-..
,
",
'.
"
"
.
"
.
.
\
\...........
\
,
I
T
\
'-
<..
, ,
..
o
IPIliJ1S
,
,
,
/
"
r
,
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
e
FOUNDED IN 1849
Fort Snelling History Center, St. Paul, ;"'N 55111 · (612) 726-1171
November 9, 1990
Mr. Clem Kachelmyer
Preliminary Design Engineer
6l2H Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Mr. Kachelmyer:
Re: S.P. 8214-92 & 8217-10 (T.H. 36) Minn. Proj. F 064( )
St. Croix River Crossing at Stillwater, Washington County
MHS Referral File Number: Y-323
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your October 11 documentation for Section
106 review of the above referenced project.
e
In regard to the identification of properties, we feel that the inventory may not be
complete. The documentation does not include the Dr. Noreen Robert's 1985 survey
report entitled Historical Reconstruction of the Riverfront. Stillwater. Washington
County. Minnesota, prepared under contract for the Corps of Engineers. It appears
that sections of the various corridors outside of the downtown area have not been
completely surveyed for structures or archaeological properties, and we recommend
that such surveys be completed for whichever alternative is selected.
In regard to your assessment of effect, we disagree with your finding that the
various study alternates are expected to have no effect on listed or potential Na-
tional Register properties. Our findings on the various alternates are listed below.
Central Corridor
1. Your report recognizes that the construction of a new bridge in the central
corridor has a potential visual effect on the existing lift bridge. We believe
that this effect is potentially adverse, through the "introduction of visual,
audible, or atmospheric elements that are out of character with the property or
alter its setting" (36 'CFR 800.9(b)(3). We also believe that this alternate
has a potentially adverse visual effect on the proposed commercial historic
district based on the same adverse effect criteria.
e
2. This alternate ha$ a potential adverse effect on the existing lift bridge
because state funding for the existing lift bridge will be discontinued when
the new crossing is operational. This may, in turn, lead to "neglect of a
property resulting in its deterioration or destruction" or "transfer, lease, or
sale of the property" (criteria of adverse effect, 36 CFR 800.9(b)(4) and 36
CFR 800.9(b)(5)). It is essential that this potential adverse effect be
address~d as part of the Section 106 review of this project. Your suggestion
to administer a separate public decision-making process on the existing lift
bridge at a later time is not acceptable, because there may be no Section 106
review required at that time, and because the potential abandonment of the ex-
isting lift bridge is a potential effect of the current project.
.,~
e
November 9, 1990
Clem Kache1myer
MHS #Y-323
Page two
South Corridor
1. Your report acknowledges that construction of a new bridge in the south
corridor has the potential to effect the setting of the existing lift bridge
and the proposed commercial historic district. We believe that this effect is
potentially adverse, through the "introduction of visual, audible, or atmos-
pheric elements that are out of character with the property or alter its
setting" (36 CFR 800. 9(b)(3).
2. This alternate also has a potential adverse effect on the existing lift
bridge for the same reasons outlined under #2 under the Central Corridor,
above.
No Build/No Action
e
We acknowledge your point that the increased noise, air pollution, and conges-
tion likely to result under this option may be harmful to the commercial his-
toric district (and that the existing lift bridge itself may be affected).
However, we do not believe that "no action" meets the requirement of an
"undertaking," as defined in 36 CFR 800.2(0), and, therefore, it does not ap-
pear that a finding of effect or adverse effect would be appropriate for this
alternate.
No Build/Replacement on Site (ROS)
1. This alternate would have an adverse effect on the existing lift bridge be-
cause of the "physical destruction, damage, or alteration of all or part of the
property" (36 CFR 800.9(b)(1)).
2. This alternate also has a potential adverse effect on the commercial his-
toric district,because of the "introduction of visual, audible, or atmospheric
elements that are out of character with the property or alter it setting" (36
CFR 800.9(b)(3)).
No Build/Transportation System Mana2ement (TSM)
e
1. We believe that this alternate has a potential adverse effect on the com-
mercial historic district due to changes in traffic patterns in the historic
area. We note that the important components of historic districts are not
limited to the buildings themselves; such elements as sidewalk width and street
circulation patterns often constitute subtle but important factors in defining
a district's character. (See 36 CFR 800.9(b)(3)). The alternate also has a
potential adverse effect on the existing lift bridge, depending on the change
in traffic volumes. -
e
e
e
"
November 9, 1990
Clem Kachelmyer
MHS #Y-323
Page three
In summary, we find that the Central Corridor, South Corridor, No Build/ROS and No.
Build/TSM alternates all have potential adverse effects on National Register
listed/eligible properties, and feel that full consultation, pursuant to 36 CFR
800.5(e), with the Advisory Council and other interested parties (including the City
of Stillwater) should occur to discuss ways tb avoid or mitigate those effects.
Finally, we would like to discuss the National Park Service's request that the exist-
ing bridge be removed if a new one is constructed. In our opinion, this position
represents a serious lapse of the Park Service's obligation to protect cultural
resources in our National Parks. We take issue with the NPS position that adding one
new crossing constitutes "proliferation," and we point out that the city of
Stillwater, along with the existing lift bridge that was built to serve it, con-
stitutes an overall cultural landscape that should receive high priority for protec-
tion within the program of the National Scenic Riverway.
Thank you for your continued close attention to the protection of the state's cul-
tural resources in planning for this project. Please .contact me or Ted Lofstrom if
you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~
Dennis A. Gimmestad
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DAG:dmb
cc: David N. Given, National Park Service, Midwest Regional Office
1709 Jackson Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102
Mayor Wallace L. Abrahamson, Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Duane Hubbs, Stillwater HPC Chairperson
216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Old Post Office Building
1100 Pennsylvania NW - Room 809, Washington, D. C. 20004
e
e
e
,.
. .,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA:
November 7, 1990
RE:
GRADING PERMIT FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY PARKING STRUCTURE - LAW ENFORCEMENT
SITE
Background:
Washington County has received City approval for construction of a parking
structure to provide parking for the recently constructed three-level office
addi tion. The grading plans for the site include grading for the law enforcement
center portion of the site as well as the parking structure portion.
The grading plans have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. As
required by City ordinance, an erosion control bond is necessary. A letter from
the County requests to substituted the bond requirements with a letter of "good
faith". This grading permit is being brought to the Council because the law
enforcement project plans have not been reviewed by the City and rough grading
of the site is being proposed.
Recommendations:
Approval
Attachments.
OFFICE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ATTORNEY
Mr. Steve Russell
City Planner
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
,AJv!
J I _-
. ARNEy
Washington County Government Center
1490061 st Street North - P_O_ Box 6
Stillwater, MN 55082-0006
November 2, 1990
Dear Steve:
The following is proposed language glvlng the City of Stillwater assurances that
Washington County will complete the erosion control measures described in the
grading plans for the Government Center expansion:
In connection with the issuance of Grading Plan G-90-4 by the City
of Stillwater to Washington County as part of the Government
Center expans i on project, Washi ngton County agrees all erosion
control measures either described in the grading plan or
subsequently deemed necessary will be installed by Washington
County as part of the project.
e
This assurance is given to satisfy the City of Stillwater's
requirement that financial assurances be given prior to the
issuance of any grading plans.
Steve, if this letter is satisfactory, please contact either myself or Lyle
Doerr and we will make arrangements to have a formalized version of this letter
signed by Washington County and provided to the City prior to its November 13,
1990 meeting.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD M. ARNEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
0J:tu
Howard R. Turrentine
Assistant County Attorney
HRT/sf
cc: Lyl e Doerr
e
Administration Division
(612) 779-5405
Civil Division
(612)779-5463
Criminal! Juvenile Divisions Social Services Division
(612) 779-5405 (612) 779-5404
Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Victim/Witness Division
(612) 779-5405
Facsimile Machine
(612)779-5498
s~@
e
ArSeJ
ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000
October 31, 1990
RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
WASHINGTON COUNTY CENTER
PARKING RAMP & LEC
GRADING PLAN
PUD 88-71
SEH FILE NO: 89114
Mr. Steve Russell,
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
e
Dear Mr. Russell:
I have reviewed the grading plan for Washington County Law
Enforcement Center and parking ramp structure located near 62nd
Street and Panama Avenue. The plan generally meets the City
requirements and standards.
As previously discussed (October 22, 1990 letter), the erosion
control and pond requirements proposed are adequate. Erosion
control will consist of installation of silt fences, hay bales,
minor sodding at inlet structure, seeding, mulch and disc
anchoring. Our estimate for the costs for this erosion control
is $8,290. The estimate is as follows:
Est. Unit
Description Unit Qty. Price Total
1. Silt Fence L.F. 1,400 $ 5.00 $7,000
2. Hay Bales Each 30 5.00 150
3. Seeding Acre 1.2 100.00 120
4. Seed Lbs. 60 2.00 120
5. Mulch Tons 7.2 110.00 792
6. Disc Anchoring Acre 3.6 30.00 108
Total $8,290
e
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
Sf PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
e
Mr. Steve Russell
October 31, 1990
Page #2
Attached is a print indicating the erosion controls proposed.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
iS~ c pI-
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
BCP/cih
Enclosure
e
e
e
"'SeJ
ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, sr PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612490-2000
October 22, 1990
RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WASHINGTON COUNTY LAW
ENFORCEMENT CENTER AND
PARKING RAMP PREGRADING
PUD 88-71
Mr. Steve Russell,
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
e
I have reviewed the pregrading plan prepared for the Washington
County Law Enforcement Center and parking ramp structure to be
located near 62nd Street and .Paris Avenue. This plan was
prepared by Comstock and Davis. The plan includes the grading of
the total site and not only the approved parking ramp area.
Siltation fences are shown around the site and appear adequate.
The grading plan generally meets city requirements and standards.
The plan will maintain an existing low drainage swale in its
natural state during the winter and spring to help with erosion
control. Ponding is proposed at the southeasterly corner of the
site and from .the drainage computations, ~upplies appear
adequate. The plan is similar to a plan presented in 1988 and
reviewed at that time.
I would recommend approval of the grading plan as submitted.
Sincerely,
~-/1-
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
BCP/cih
e
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
ST. PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
, " ,
e
Permi t No .~/'I6 -,4t
Date 11- - 90'
Fee &),.;? '",)C:J
CITY OF STILLWATER '.
GRADING PERMIT APPLICATION
Location of Property 62 Street North &
Owner of Property:
Name Washington County, Minnesota
Address 14g00 51st Street North
Phone Number 779-5401
Panama Avenue North
Applicant/Contractor
Name of Company
Address
Phone Number
Contact Person
if other than Own~r
Same
Amount of soil moved 55,000 cu.yds.
Date Grading will commence Approx. Nov. 12, 1990
Date Grading will be completed Approx. Jan. 15, 1991
The following information shall be submitted with this application for a Grading Permit.
The legal description of the property;
The fee required by Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code;
Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property;
Existing and proposed final grades utilizing two foot contour intervals; .
A survey showing the location and elevation of all roads, utilities and
structures which may be impacted by the proposal;
A tree survey showing all trees having a caliper of six inches or greater and a
tree preservation plan;
A landscaping and site restoration plan;
A development concept plan indicating how the recontoured parcel may be
developed in a manner consistent with this Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
A drainage plan which includes any engineering work for stormwater retention
which may be necessary;
An erosion control plan indicating the type and location of erosion control
measures to be used;
A traffic analysis showing how the materials will he removed from or delivered
to the site; -
Two copies of all available soil borings together with boring location maps and'
any other soils information pertinent to improvements;
Such other information as may be required by the City.
NOTE: All grading plans for over 1,000 cubic yards shall be prepared by a qualified
profess i ona 1.
l.
2.
3.
\ 4.
-5.
6.
e 7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
13.
$400.50
PLAN CHECK FEE
$105.00
TOTAL FEE $505.50
PERMIT FEE
NO
AMOUNT
BOND REQUIRED: YES
x
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The foll owing Speci al Condi ti ons of Approval shall be
incorporated into the grading plans for the property.
e
, Community Development Director.
Reviewed by
e
WASHINGTON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GOVERNMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 . STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006
Office: 6121779-5401 FAX: 612/779-3900
November 7, 1990
Mr. Steve Russell
City Planner
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
e
In connection with the issuance of Grading Plan G-90-4 by the
City of Stillwater to Washington County as part of the
Government Center expansion project, Washington County agrees
all erosion control measures either described in the grading
plan or subsequently deemed necessary will be installed by
Washington County as part of the project.
This assurance is given to satisfy the City of Stillwater's
requirement that financial assurances be given prior to the
issuance of any grading permit for the government center
expansion project.
Sincerely,
D~~.~/~
Donald G. Scheel, Chai~man
Washington County Board of Commissioners
DGS:pr
e
Washington County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national Origin,
sex, religion, age or handicapped status in employment or the provision of services.
Dennis C. Hegberg
District 1
Russ Larkin
District 2
Sally Evert
District 3
Phillip R. McMullen
District 4
Donald G. Scheel
District 5/Chairman
.,.......,..-'0
0' rJ;:4 ...
:\%8)
''(OJ c.4t.
+f'It,04.le:....~~
e
r illwater
~ - - ~~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NOVEMBER 7, 1990
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF LAND DEDICATION AND LAND PURCHASE FOR
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK LOCATED NORTH OF 61ST STREET AND
SOUTHWEST OF EXTENDED HARRIET STREET.
The Brick Pond area plan designates the site, a portion being
dedicated to the City and a portion purchased by the City for a
neighborhood park. The 1.5 acre site has been approved by the Parks
and Recreation Commission as a neighborhood park location.
e
The recent subdivision of the adjacent property owner by the park
land owner (Rose Floral) requires the dedication of 17,269 'square
feet of the 1.5 acre site for park purposes. Other portions of the
site are in pond easement or a part of the Greenbelt Area.
The $10,000 purchase price for the remainder of the land is based on
a $1.00 per square foot value.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept dedication and purchase of land and ? purchase price of
$10,000 to be paid out of the available park dedication fund.
e
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
....
e
RESOLUTION NO.
~y~
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF
PARK PROPERTY FROM ROSE FLORAL AND
GREENHOUSE, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION
WHEREAS
1 . Lawrence Rose and Rose Floral and Greenhouse, Inc.
(the "Developer"), has proposed to the City the
plat of Forest Ridge Addition to the City of
Stillwater, a subdivision including 19 lots and
requiring, pursuant to park dedication
requirements of the City, a dedication of 9
percent of the residential land and 7.5 of the
commercial land contained within the subdivision
for park purposes. This requirement compels the
Developer to dedicate 17,269 square feet of land.
2. The comprehensive plan for the Brick Pond area
neighborhood, however, shows a future neighborhood
park located North across 61st Street from the
proposed development. This land is also owned by
the Developer.
e
3.
That as part of the development of 61st Street,
(Local Improvement No. 251) the City has obtained
five separate appraisals of both residential and
commercial land, all within a quarter mile area of
the Developer's land and of substantially the same
character zoning and topography.
4. That the parcel of land being considered for a
park purchase lying North of 61st Street contains
apprxoimately 63,159 square feet, 35,879 square
feet being burdened by street, sewer and drainage
easements, leaving a net available and useable
square footage of 27,280 square feet lying North
of the street.
5. That the Community Development Director has
negotiated a transaction whereby Developer would
deed to the City that land North of the center
line of 61st Street, including the land encumbered
by easements, in return for payment to the
Developer by the City in the sum of $10,000 and a
forgiveness of the park dedication requirement for
the 19 lot final plat portion of the Forest Ridge
Addition.
e
.'
6.
That
part
and p
advan
acqui
or be
neigh
7.
That
trans
manne
due a
at th
appli
the C
acqui
prope
payme
1992
"
ased upon appraisals already obtained as
f Local Improvement #251, the proposed trade
yment of $10,000 to the Developer is
ageous to the City and results in the
ition of park land by the City at a price at
ow prevailing market rates for land in the
orhood.
t will be necessary as part of this
ction, as negotiated, to pay when due in the
of a private owner, the real estate taxes
d payable in the year 1991 in a sum that is
s time undetermined. However, an
ation for exempt status will be filed with
unty of Washington immediately upon
ing title to the property. This park
ty will thereafter be exempt from the
t of real estate taxes payable in the year
nd future years.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,
That the 1 nd transaction herein described is approved
and the Mayor and Cl rk be authorized to sign the Earnest Money
Contract attached he eto as Exhibit A.
Further, t
Attorney prepare the
accomplish this purp
instruments necessar
the exempt status of
payable 1992 and fut
at the City Finance Director and the City
necessary documents and transfer of funds
se and to file and record the various
to accomplish the transfer and to secure
the land after purchase for the tax year
re years.
Enacted by the City Council of Stillwater, the City of
Stillwater, this 13t day of November, 1990.
Wally Abrahamson,
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, Cl rk
..
e
e
to
e
No.1517A
M ILLER/r>A VIS Co.
Minneapolis. MN
DO NOT COpy
Suhject to CopyriJ(ht Laws
STANDARD
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
yy nil r..,.VII1Ce \",opy
YELLOW.Buyer's Copy
GREEN.Seller's Copy
PINK-Buyer's Receipt
~
stillwater
2. RECEIVED OF The City of Stillwater
the sum of One Hnndred-----------------------------Dollars ($ 100.00
by .check ,." as earnest money to be deposited the next business day after acceptance in trust account of listing broker
5. (unless otherwise specified in writing) and in part payment for the purchase of the premises legally described as
See legal description attached as Exhibit "A"
6.
7
8-
, Minnesota
November 13
,19~
10.
11 .
12.
13.
located at (Street Address)
9_ Cityof Stillwater ,Countyof Washinqton ,StateofMinnesota,
including all plants, shrubs and trees, all storm windows and/or inserts, storm doors, screens, awnings, window shades, blinds, curtain-
traverse-drapery rods, attached lighting fixtures with bulbs, plumbing fixtures, water heater, heating system, humidifier, central air conditioning,
electronic air filter, automatic garage door opener with controls, water softener, cable television outlets and cabling, BUILT-INS to include:
dishwasher, garbage disposal, trash compactor, oven(s), cooktop stove, microwave oven, hood-fan, intercom, installed carpeting, IF ANY,
located on the premises which are the property of Seller and also the following personal property: none-
vacant land
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
all of which property Seller has this day sold to Buyer for the sum of: $ 1 0 , 000 . 00
Ten Thousand and no/lOO---------------------------------------------
Dollars,
which Buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: Earnest money of $ 1 00 . 00
$ 9,900 cash on or before Dpr'erober 14, 19qn
of $ by financing as follows: r.i"l ~ 11. - .
and
, the date of closing, and the balance
a6.
_7.
28.
29.
30.
31. Attached are - 0 - addendums which are made a part of this agreement.
32_ SUBJECT TO performance by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute and deliver a
33. to be joined in by spouse, if any, conveying marketable title to the premises subject only to the following exceptions:
34. (1) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations. (2) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the premises without
35. effective forfeiture provision. (3) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (4) Utility and drainage easements
36. which do not interfere with present improvements. (5) Rights of tenants, if any.
37. REAL ESTATE TAXES Seller agrees to pay ---1.2./ 12ths and Buyer agrees to pay 0 / 12ths of taxes due and payable in the year
38. 19 -29Seller agrees to pay n / 12ths and Buyer agrees to pay 1? / 12ths of annual installment of special assessments due
39. and payable in the year 19 ~l .etx~ot:xxxx~~xxxxx'XX~fH11e~il'te:Of~I'6Sl~~e1~SseSSm~~~~.
40_ Buyer shall pay taxes due and payable in the year 19 n and any unpaid installments of special assessments payable therewith
41_ and thereafter. Seller warrants that taxes due and payable in the year 19 q1 will be iF"'LLntjri'ill'.s"""w",'; homestead
42. classification. Neither Seller nor Seller's Agent makes any representation concerning the amount of future real estate taxes.
43. WARRANTIES Seller warrants that buildings, if any, are entirely within the boundary lines of the premises. Seller warrants that all
44. appliances, heating and air conditioning, wiring and plumbing used and located on the premises are in proper working order on date of closing.
45. Buyer has right to inspect premises prior to closing. Buyer shall satisfy himself/herself at his/her expense that all appliances, heating and air
46. conditioning, wiring and plumbing are in proper working order before closing. Seller warrants that the premises are connected to: city sewer
47_ 0 yes - ~ no; city water 0 yes -X] no. If the premises are destroyed or substantially damaged by fire or any other cause before the
48. closing date, this agreement shall become null and void at Buyer's option, and the earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
49. POSSESSION Seller agrees to deliver possession not later than closing.
50. All interest, city water and sewer charges, electricity and natural gas charges, fuel oil and liquid petroleum gas shall be pro-rated between the
51. parties as of cJ.os lnq . Seller agrees to remove all debris and all personal property not included herein from the
52. premises before possession date.
53. TITLE & EXAMINATION Seller shall, within a reasonable time after acceptance of this agreement, furnish an Abstract of Title, or a
~4. Registered Property Abstract, certified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, State and Federal judgments and liens. Buyer
~5. shall be allowed 10 business days after receipt for examination of title and making any objections, which shall be made in writing or deemed
56. waived. If any objection is so made, Seller shall be allowed 120 days to make title marketable. Pending correction of title, payments hereunder
57. required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within 10days after written notice to Buyer, the parties shall perform this
58. agreement according to its terms. If title is not corrected within 120 days from the date of written objection, this agreement shall be null and
59. void, at option of Buyer, neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other, and earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
60. DEFAULT If title is marketable or is corrected within said time, and Buyer defaults in any of the agreements herein, Seller may terminate this
61. agreement, and on such termination all payments made hereunder shall be retained by Seller and Agent, as their respective interests may appear,
62. as liquidated damages, time being ofthe essence hereof. This pre-vision shall not deprive either party ofthe right of enforcing the specific performance
63. ofthis agreement, provided this agreement is not terminated and action to enforce specific performance is commenced within six months after
64. such right of action arises. In the event Buyer defaults in his performance of the terms of this Agreement, and Notice of Cancellation is
65. served upon the Buyer pursuant to MSA 559.21, the termination period shall be thirty (30) days as permitted by Subdivision 4 of MSA
66. 559.21.
67. ACCEPTANCE Buyer understands and agrees that this sale is subject to acceptance by Seller in writing. Agent is not liable or responsible
68- on account of this agreement, except to return or account for the earnest money.
69. AGENCY DISCLOSURE poneU,VE OF ,\GE~iT 08 8RCKER' stipulates he or she Is representing the
70. in this transaction. The listing agent or broker stipulates he or she is representing the seller In this transaction.
Warranty Deed,
'r~UYEp. "~~Ll.En!
73. SEllER
Rose Floral and Greenhouse,
74. SElLER Tn(" , rl 1\1; nne90ta rorporQt; on
I agree to purchase the premises for the price and on the terms and
conditions set forth above,
~~~ of Stillwater
71. I, the owner of the premises, accept this agreement and
72. the sale hereby made.
BUYER
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
75. Delivery of all papers and monies shall be made at the office of:
76_ Company
77. Address
SetlirQJ~~lc
Mary Lou Johnson,
City
Clerk
Zip
78. THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SEEK COMPETENT ADVICE.
e
e
e
. "
EXHIBIT "A"
That part of the West half of the West half of the Southeast
quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 33, Township 30
North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as "Parcel A", lying Northerly of the following
described line:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the Southeast quarter of
the Southwest quarter; thence South 89 degrees 16 minutes 05
seconds East, assumed bearing, along the West line of the
Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter 250.03 feet; thence
South 89 degrees 51 minutes 41 seconds East 35.00 feet to the
point of Beginning of the line to be described; thence
Northeasterly a distance of 150.21 feet along a non-tangential
curve concave to the Northwest, having a radius of 301.56 feet, a
central angle of 28 degrees 32 minutes 21 seconds, and a chord
bearing of North 75 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds East; thence
North 61 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East 150.00 feet, tangent
to this curve, to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A",
thence Northeasterly a distance of 153.42 feet along a tangential
curve concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 301.56 feet
and a central angle of 29 degrees 09 minutes 02 seconds; thence
South 89 degrees 31 minutes 38 seconds East, tangent to this
curve, along a line 135.00 feet South of and parallel to the
North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest quarter,
900.78 feet to a point on the East line of the Southeast quarter
of the Southwest quarter and there terminating. This line is
prolonged or shortened to terminate on the East and West lines of
"Parcel A". Subject to easements of record.
;:
e
r illwater
~ ~~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA . J
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
NOVEMBER 6, 1990
SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II TO CONSTRUCT STORM SEWER
LINES IN CURVE CREST BLVD. RIGHT-OF-WAY.
e
The Developer of the office/warehouse project on the northwest corner of Curve
Crest Blvd. and Washington Avenue petitioned the City for street and utility
improvements extending Curve Crest Blvd. approximately three hundred feet to
west of Washington Avenue.
In order to proceed with the development project now, the Developer is
requesting permission from the City to construct the storm sewer line in Curve
Crest Blvd. this fall in advance of Curve Crest Blvd. improvements and to be
reimbursed by the City for the costs as provided in the letter.
The Developer would use plans for the sewer line construction prepared by the
City Engineer and the installation would b~ inspected by the City Engineer.
The Developer is requesting the City pay the costs of improvement at time of
completion of the project or time of completion of extension of Curve Crest
Blvd. or at the time of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I of
the Stillwater office/industrial building project.
In the past, the City has given the property owner a credit for the public
improvement privately constructed by the private property owner at the time of
assessment for the di strict improvements but not an "Up front" cash payment.
. .
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of request to allow the Developer to construct the storm sewer
improvements using the City plans and inspected by the City with the agreement
that a credit will be given to the Developer/Property Owner when the Curve
Crest street/utility improvement project is completed and improvement
assessed.
ATTACHMENT:
Letter from Curve Crest Properties II - November 2, 1990.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
~.
...
Curve Crest Properties II
e
------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
November 2, 1990
City Council Members
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
1809 Northwestern Ave.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612)430-1500
Fax 430-1505
Dear Council Members:
RE: Stillwater II 0 ice/Industrial Building
Please except this letter as the request of the developer to privately contract for
the extension of the sto drainage system from the intersection of Washington
Avenue and Curve Crest B ulevard westerly in the right of way of the future
extension of Curve Crest oulevard to the final point of engineering currently
prepared by the City Engi eer. The developer herewith agrees to expend all
necessary moneys to pro ide installation including any required engineering
changes, permits, inspectio s, and all construction costs as well as to provide
such indemnities and in sur nce as required by the City for work normally done
in a public right of way.
e
Developer further requests that the City of Stillwater reimburse the developer
for costs involved in this operation based on the following conditions:
Amount of reimbursemen shall be the lesser of the sworn construction cost
statement by the Develope or the lowest qualified bid for the same installation
to be done when bid as a portion of the total improvements of utilities, curb and
gutter, and road surfacing or the extension of Curve Crest Boulevard as
petitioned for by the Dev loper.
The refund to Developer hall be by form of check or draft within 60 days of
the latest of the following to occur:
A. City's acceptance 0 Developer's final installation of the storm drainage
system.
B. City's acceptance 0 the completed extension of Curve Crest Boulevard
inclusive of all uti ities, curb and gutter, and road surfacing.
C. Issuance by the Cit of a Certificate of Occupancy for Phase I of the
Stillwater II Offic /Industrial Building.
The amount rebated by the City would then be included in the total assessment
for the extension of Curve Crest Boulevard as currently being petitioned. This
method of accounting for he costs then becomes equitable for all property
owners who would be ass ssed for these improvements.
e
. '
e
e
e
Thank you for your attention in this matter. Should you require any additional
information please contact me directly.
Respectfully submitted,
~.~~ CRES: PROPERTIES II
~~
/James E. Kellison
, Owners Representative
/mq
, \
e
PET TION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
(IF LESS THAN 100% BUT NOT MORE THAN 35% OF OWNERSHIP PETITION)
Stillwater, Minnesota
October 31. 1990
To the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota:
Statutes, Chapter 429.
f-
e
We the undersigned,
property abutting on
th rI
ervices
installation of utility
pursuant to Minnesota
This property is best d scribed as the approximate 2.35 acres lying northwest
of the intersection of ashington A venue and Curve Crest Boulevard as shown
on
(l~/t
c
Examined, checked and ound to be in proper form and to be signed by the
required number of ow ers of property. affected by the making of the
improvement petitioned for.
e
Date:
City Clerk
;/ "-
e
e
e
PETITION OF LOCAL IMPROVEMENT
(IF LESS THAN 100% BUT NOT MORE THAN 35% OF OWNERSHIP PETITION)
Stillwater, Minnesota
October 31. 1990
To the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota:
We the undersigned, owners of not less than 35% in frontage of the real
property abutting on Curve Crest Avenue. between Washin&ton Avenue and
the westerly property line of Parcel 1 of Outlot A of Stillwater Industrial
Business Park as extended southerly across the future Curve Crest ri&ht-of-
~ hereby petition that such street is improved by the installation of utility
services and curb. &utter and bituminous surfacin& pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429.
This property is best described as the approximate 2.35 acres lying northwest
of the intersection of Washington Avenue and Curve Crest Boulevard as shown
on the attached survey.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER
121
c
(E,/2,
~~
( }1ta If J If
It/CJ/c;O
Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the
required number of owners of property affected by the making of the
improvement petitioned for.
I>ate: ~~
Jli4~~
. City Cler
&. /970
/
.'"""\.J
e
Phone 464-JI30
DON C. HUl.T
Minn. Reg. No. 6617
Wis. Reg. No. $-950
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
HUL T & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Land Surveyors
6695 lake 130ulcvard
FOREST lAKE, MINN. 55025
DALE F. HE13EISEN
Minn. Reg. No. 13590
TERRANCE G. JOHNSON
Minn. Reg. No. 13115
I hereby certify thai this survey. plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct super-
vision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under Ihe laws of the StaLe of Minnesota.
p;i;; 12;.--:F-. ~~~ Date October 11 , 1990 Scale: I Inch = ~o Feet
<l:
....
0
-J
....
::>
0
LL.
0
....
LL.
I"-
~
10
00
M
e :;
LL.
0
W
Z
-J
u.i
:;
0 ~
.... It'l
Co ~
I/) M
~
Z
e
MAILING ADDRESS:
1'.0. Box 37
Forest Lake. MN. 55025
. DENOTES IRON PIPE FOUND
o DENOTES IRON PIPE SET
N.89028'29"W.
320.78
(/)Q
IJJ
:>
<(
-J
-J
IJJ
0:
o
:z:
en
<(
o
W
l-
I-
<(
-J
a.
-
102211 SQ. FT.
00
~
~
~
M
:0
!O
<0
uM
<D
....
/I
<J
r-...
(')
c<)
M
OJ
"
0::
r-...
10
c:i
I"-
(\I
/I
-J
.
w
:>
<t'
Z
o
f-
~
Z
-
:r
en
~
I
s. LINE OUTLOT A
0)0
u.i
OC\A
(\1'<1'
Co<D
(\II"-
Q
"!
lJ)
PART OF OUTLOT A, STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WASHINGTON COUNTYJ MINNESOTA
SURVEY FOR: CON/SPEC CORPORATION, Stillwater, MN 55092
LEGALDESClilPT ION: (proposecl as rCCluestecJ tlY c1 ient)
That part of the South 344.88 feet of Outlot A. STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK.
Washington County, t"linnesota, lying east of the West 386.97 feet thereof.
SUI)ject to and together with any valid easements, restrictions ancl
reservat ions.
N.89028'29"W.
290.81
'7 5T~-r /f Iv. ~Jj7'1,(,q,k"( ,.-
CURVE CREST BLVD" (PLATTED AS 63RD. ST. N.
"NOT BUILT"
-
z
... .'.
.
e
QtiJ~~ate~
TH ;-;~"TH' LA CE OF .,,"'SO ~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR~
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1990
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CREDIT FOR PREVIOUS PARK DEDICATION
PAYMENT FOR SUBDIVISION AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF
CURVE CREST BOULEVARD AND WASHINGTON AVENUE. CASE
NO. SUBj90-48.
e
The property owner of the subdivided property has submitted
this letter indicating that a previous park dedication fee
has been paid on the subject property, a part of the 130
acre Stillwater Industrial Park plat. The amount paid was
equal to $19,252.50. The park dedication requirement for
the current platting is $10,221.00 based on the recently
approved park dedication policy.
RECOMMENDATION:
Allow previous park dedication fee account for current
requirement or make payment to park dedication fund from
TIF proceeds for the subdivision as a form of project
assistance. This would supply funds for future park
purchase in and outside the TIF District area.
ATTACHMENT:
Letters.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
e
e
/.
MAGNUSON LAW OFFICE 6124395641
ECf<BERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS. WOLFF & VIERLING
120 SCUTI-f SECOND 5Tn~E'I'
P. O. eOll 40
STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 5.!lOa;Z
P.02
4:)F;I.~a78
LYLE J. E(;KeERG
t JAMI;S F. I.,At-lI-1ERS
ROOI;RT G. BtllGGS
PAUl. A. wOLF'"
MAt'll< J. VIERLING
January 231 1984
Mr. Dennis O'Donnell
'. Washington County Planning
Department
washington County Courthouse
Stillwater, MN 55082
In Re: Hatt Hooley Addition/Cub Food Stor~s
Dear Dennis:
Regarding the above-ehtit.leo. matter, I ul\c'lt~rstand that
an application either has been made or will be made shortly for
site pl<:lu review and the i~su[lnce of the building p(:~rmit for th~
construction of a new Cub Foods. Store on Lots 1 throuqh 7 of the
Matt llooloy Addition in the Stillwater Industrial PClrk.
My c:lionts have requested that I contact you regarding
the issue of park dedication. On October 18, 1978; the Washington
County Pl~nning Department originally requested the payment from
my cli~nts of the sum of $19,252.50 as and for park dedicatiQn.
This sum w~s computed on the basis of lO~ of the assessor's
estimated nl~rket value of the entire Stillwuter Industrial Pnrk,
which \Vas platted at that time, to-wit: 130.5 acres. pursuant to
our negotiations with the city of Stillwater, the wushington
County Planning Department and ultimately the approval of )::h~
Joint powers Committee, my clients paid the sum of $11;873-50
for p~rk dudication. The basis for the adjustment from the sum
originally ~eque~ted was that the Joint Powers committee agreed
to give my clients a credit of $1,500.00 per acre for the
4.92 acres dedicated for storm water ponding purposes and for
the dedication of the land which waS utilized for the above
ground w~ter storage site. It was clearly unde~stood and stated
at this timG that no further paymen-l:.s would be required from my
clients or any othe.r landowners in the Stillwater Industrial Park.
for park dedication within the area included in the 130.5 acres
constituting the Stillwater Industrial Park.
After reviewing this matter should you have any qu~stionti
or should you cesire to discuss this matter in further detail, I
would appreciate your giving me a call.
Very truly yours,
JFL : j 0
ce. Charles M. Hooley
James F. Lammers
e
e
e
MAGNUSON LAW OFFICE
6124395641
P.01
LA.... o""'CIl.S or
ECKBERG. LAMMERS. BRIGGS 8: WOLFF. P.A.
12G SOUTH E>ECONO STREI;;l
STI\,~WAn:R. M1NN~$O'tA $$002
dJll.2E\')'E\
\, YLE J. ECKOERG
)AMl!S F L"MMl!R~
ROaEAT G gRIGGS
PAUL A WOll'''
M^R~ J VIERl.1NG
November 30, 1978
0' CO\JNS.(~
WI~'5"ON It SIlNDUiN
Marv Ray, Planner
Washington County Planning Department
Washington County Court House
14900 - 61st St. N.
Stillwater, Minnesota 55092
Rc: Stillwater Industrial Park
Dear Marv:
Regarding the above-entitled matter enclosed herewith
please find a copy of the ~xQcut~d Covenants and il copy of the
proposed 1:cis01Ilcnts. Both Doug Swenson .and Dave t-1ugnulion hilV~
reviewed the s<:\rn~ and find them to be in order.
I wish to confirm that we have agreed that the lIoo1oys
should be giv~n a Sl,500 credit per acre on the land dedicated
for storm wnter ponding purposQs and for the water storage
site and th<.1c thE? total area to be credited is 4.92 acres.
It, thereforo, is my understanding that the Hooleys would owe
for park dedication the sum of $11,873.50. My clients have
agreed to have a certified check prepared in that amount.
It is my understanding that you will arrange for a
special meeti.ng of t.he Joint Powers Commit.t.ee and th~t you ....
will adv iSQ I1\Q pr ior to the hearing if there are o!1ny probl~Hns
regardiny the above.
Thank you for your cooperation to date regurding this
matter.
Very truly yours,
James F. Lammers
JFL: lms
Enclosures
cc: Jack Hooley
e
RESOLUTION
SUPPLEMENTING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
(Downtown and Industrial Park
Scattered Site Redevelopment District)
WHEREAS,
1. Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General Partnership
("Developer") plans to construct a building on the Northwest
corner of Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue that will
contain approximately 18,400 square feet and that will be used as
office/industrial warehouse facilities with limited retail (the
"Project").
2. The Developer has demonstrated to the city council and the
city council hereby finds that this Project would not take place
but for the tax increment assistance made available to the
Project by the City and that the Project and the assistance are
in furtherance of the objectives of the City to develop the
property into a vital commercial/industrial area that produces
jobs, tax base and is an enhancement to the community.
e
3. That the Project is within Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1 (The Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered Site
Redevelopment Act) within Development District No.1.
4. That the Project and the assistance is consistent with the
Statement of Objectives found at Subsection 1.4 of Development
Program for Development District No.1 as adopted May 7, 1985,
and as modified December 12, 1985, and further consistent with
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 (Downtown and Scattered Site Redevelopment
District).
5. That neither the Development Program for Development
District No.1, nor the Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1 need to be modified (within the meaning
of Minnesota Statutes ~469.175, Sub. 4.) to include this project.
WHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1 is supplemented by adding to Subsection
2.5 thereof, the following language:
e
"Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General Partnership,
plans to construct a building on the Northwest corner of
Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue that will
contain approximately 18,400 square feet and that will be
used as an office/industrial warehouse facility with limited
retail. Tax Increment assistance will be provided on a "pay
as you go" basi to undertake land acquistion, and public
improvements co sisting of: site preparation, grading,
landscaping and drainage improvements."
e
2. That the Tax In rement Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District N . 1 is supplemented by adding to Subsection
2.6 thereof, the fol owing language:
"It is anticipa
II, a Minnesota
a contract for
1990."
ed that the City and Curve Crest Properties
General Partnership, will have entered into
rivate Development no later than December 1,
3. That the Tax In rement Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Financing District N . 1 is supplemented by adding to Subsection
2.4 thereof, the fol owing language:
"IMP CT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS CURVE
C EST PROPERTIES II PROJECT ONLY
Since this proj ct would not have occurred without the
creation of Tax Increment Financing District No.1, the
impact is $-0- 0 other taxing jurisdictions"
In all other ways th Development Program for Development
District No. 1 and t e Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 shall remain unchanged and in full force and ~
effect. ,.,
Adopted by the City
day of November, 199 .
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, Cl rk
of the City of Stillwater the 13th
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
e
e
e
e
Curve Crest Properties /I
=============================================================================================
1809 Northwestern Ave.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612)430-1500
Fax 430-1505
November 2, 1990
City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
RE: Stillwater II Officeflndustrial Building
Dear Council Members:
Please except this letter as our request for the City to apportion the outstanding
assessments against Parcel 1 of outlot A of the Stillwater Industrial Park such
that the newly subdivided portion of 102,211 square feet for the above
referenced project will bear its pro rata share of those assessments. Those
assessments would then be assumed by Curve Crest Properties II which will be
the owner of that property.
Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please contact me should you
require any additional information regarding this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II
kU~
/1 ames E. Kellison
// Owners Representative
Imq
e
e
e
/'
Resolution # il{oS,
Reapportionment of assessments for subdivision of Parcel #11159-2000.
Whereas. the assessments for L.l. #'s 157.173.191. and 250 were
originally file for Parcel #11159-2000 and;
Whereas. the balance of assessments for Parcel #11159-2000 at
12-31-90 is as follows:
L.I. 157
L.I. 173
L.I. 191
L.I. 250
Total
$9.890.91
51.359.74
377,44
3.016.48
$64.644.57
Whereas. the City Council has given final approval for a subdivision
of Parcel #11159-2000 (per request of Con-Spec) and;
Whereas. it is the City's policy to reapportion all outstanding
assessments when a parcel of land is subdivided.
Now. therefore. be it resolved by the City Council of the City of
Stillwater that the assessments for Parcel #11159-2000 shall
be reapportioned as follows:
New Parcel (Subdivision)
Remainder of Parcel #11159-2000
L. I. 157
L.I. 173
L.I. 191
L.I. 250
Total
$ 2.674.50
13.887.67
102.06
815.66
$17.479.89
L.I. 157
L.I. 173
L.I. 191
L. I. 250
Total
$ 7.216.41
37,372.07
275.38
2.200.82
$47.164.68
Adopted by Council this 13th day of November. 1990.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.....
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and city Council
FR:
steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA:
November 7, 1990
RE:
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER AND CURVE CREST
PROPERTIES II FOR CITY ASSISTANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING
On October 16, 1990, the City Council approved, in concept an agreement with the
developer, to provide TIF assistance for construction of an office/industrial
project in the Stillwater Business Park.
The enclosed development agreement provides the requested assistance (50 percent
of new TIF proceeds) on a pay as you go basis. The term of repayment is 10 years
or at a maximum remaining term of the development district. The provision
regarding transfer of assistance benefit to a new owner is acceptable to the
City.
The project plans have been submitted to county assessor to establish an
assessors market value.
Recommendation:
Approval of development agreement.
e
Third Draft: November 8, 1990
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
AND
CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II,
A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
RELATING TO
STILLWATER II OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CURVE CREST BOULEVARD
AND WASHINGTON AVENUE
e
This contract was drafted by:
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
Magnuson & Moberg
Attorney at" Law
324 South Main street
Stillwater, Minnesota
55082
e
e
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. statement of Public Purpose and Authority. . . 1
II.
Definitions . . . .
. 1
III.
statement of Objectives .
. 2
IV.
Tax Increment Payments
. . . . . 2
V. Developer's Action to Accomplish Objectives. . 4
VI. Conditions Precedent to City Responsibility. . 5
VII.
General Provisions
. 5
VIII. Events of Default .
. 6
e
IX.
Expiration Date . .
. . . 7
X.
Effective Date
. 7
Exhibit "A" Legal Description
. 9
Exhibit "B" Assessment Agreement and
Assessor's Certificate . . . . . . .
.10
Exhibit "c" Certificate of Completion .
. . 1 7
e
e
CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA,
AND CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II,
A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
THIS CONTRACT, effective this 13th day of
November, 1990, between the City of Stillwater
(the "City"), a Home Rule Charter City of the
Third Class of the State of Minnesota, having
its principal offices at City Hall, 216 North
Fourth street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 and
Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General
Partnership, (the "Developer"), 1809
Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, Minnesota
55082.
I. STATEMENT OF PUBLIC
PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY
e
1.1. PUBLIC PURPOSE. The public purpose
of this Contract is to restore and improve the
tax base and the tax revenue generation
capacity of the City, increase employment
opportunities and employment in the City,
realize comprehensive planning goals contained
in the Comprehensive Plan and to create an
attractive and efficient area for commercial
development and other related uses.
1.2. AUTHORITY. The City has authority
pursuant to the Minnesota Tax Increment
Financing Act, Sections 469.174 through
469.175, inclusive, as amended, to finance
certain eligible private costs, and
administrative costs with tax increment
revenues derived from a Tax Increment
Financing District established within a Tax
Increment Development District.
II. DEFINITIONS
2.1. DEFINITIONS. In this Contract the
following definitions will be used:
e
"Available Tax Increments" means fifty
(50%) percent of the total increment generated
from the project actually received by the City
in any year.
- 1 -
It
"Certificate of Completion" means the
certification, in the form of the certificate
contained in Exhibit "c" attached and made a
part of this Contract.
"Construction Plans" means the plans,
specifications, drawings and related documents
of the construction work to be performed by
the Developer on the Development Property.
"Estimated Market Value" or "Estimated
Market Valuation" means the market value of
real property as determined by the County
Assessor of the County of Washington in
accordance with Minnesota statutes.
"Development Property" means that real
estate described in the attached Exhibit "A".
III. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES
e
3.1. CITY'S OBJECTIVES. The objectives
of the City are to assist the Developer in
developing the Development Property into a
vital commercial area that produces jobs, tax
base and is an enhancement to the community.
It has been demonstrated to the City Council
and the Council hereby finds that this
development would not take place but for tax
increment assistance because of the
extraordinary expenses associated with the
site.
3.2. DEVELOPER'S OBJECTIVES. The
Developer plans to construct a building on the
property that will be used as an office/
industrial warehouse facility with limited
retail.
IV. TAX INCREMENT PAYMENTS
e
4.1. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT. The
Development Property is within Tax Increment
Development District No.1, known as the
Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered Site
Redevelopment District, and the City, on
November 3, 1987, modified the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the District to include the
development area. On November 13, 1990, the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment
Funding District #1 was supplemented only to
the extent of including reference to the
Developer's specific plans for the project in
order that the Developer's construction plans
be included with the Tax Increment Financing
Plan and be eligible for the Tax Increment
Assistance provided by this Contract.
- 2 -
e
4.2. TAX INCREMENT PAYMENTS. The City
agrees to pay to the Developer in semiannual
installments, payable on the first day of
February, 1994, and the first day of August,
1994, and in subsequent years on the same
dates until the first day of August, 2003,
(the "Scheduled Payment Dates"), one-half of
the available tax increment, (the "Scheduled
Payments") or until a total of $202,565.00 is
paid, whichever occurs first.
The City shall have no obligation to make
any Scheduled Payment unless the Developer has
received or is entitled to receive by December
1, 1991, a Certificate of Completion for this
project.
The Scheduled Payment due on any
Scheduled Payment Date is payable solely from
and only to the extent that the City has
received as of the Scheduled Payment Date
available tax increments received in the six
months prior to a Scheduled Payment Date.
In the event that the Developer
voluntarily sells, assigns or transfers more
than a 75% ownership of the property before
the year 1999, the tax increments to be paid
to the Developer shall be limited to the
amount paid to that date, or $126,000,
whichever is less. This provision shall not
apply to an involuntary transfer of the
property or to a mortgagee in possession of
the property or to the subsequent transferee
of a mortgage in possession.
Each payment shall be made by check or
draft payable to the Developer and mailed to
the Developer at 1809 Northwestern AVenue,
Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082. The Developer,
by notice to the City, may designate different
addresses to which the payments shall be sent.
This obligation shall not be payable from
or constitute a change upon the funds of the
City, and the Developer shall never have, or
be deemed to have, the right to compel any
exercise of any taxing power of the City or
any other public body, and neither the City
nor any council member, office employee or
agent of the City shall be liable personally
thereon.
e
V. DEVELOPER'S ACTION TO ACCOMPLISH
OBJECTIVES
e
5.1. THE PROJECT. The Developer shall
construct or shall cause to be constructed on
the site a building containing approximately
18,840 square feet of rentable space and a
- 3 -
e
parking lot providing for approximately 88
cars. The total project costs including the
land, landscaping and construction will be
approximately $1,420,000. The Developer will
construct this without any substantial
deviation from the construction plans that are
on file with the City and the site and parking
plan that has been approved by the City.
5.2. ELIGIBLE COSTS. The Developer has
provided to the City assurances satisfactory
to the City that the tax increment funds being
paid to the Developer are for the
reimbursement of costs incurred by the
Developer that are legally permissible and
qualifying costs that are eligible for
reimbursement by the City pursuant to the
Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act.
5.3. NOT FOR SPECULATION. The
Developer promises to the City that this
building is built for rent or lease and not
for sale or speculation.
e
VI. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CITY
RESPONSIBILITY
6.1. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT.
Responsibility to provide the tax increment
financing assistance to the project as set
forth in Section 4.2 of this Contract is
conditioned upon the happening of the
following events:
a. Approval of the Developer's
construction plans by the Stillwater building
official and approval of the Developer's
development plans for the Development Property
by the City of Stillwater Community
Development Director and, if required,
pursuant to Stillwater Ordinances, the
approval of the development plans by the
Stillwater City Council.
b. The granting by the City of a
Certificate of Completion of the Developer's
improvements without any substantial deviation
from the construction plans approved and on
file with the City.
e
c. Execution by the Developer of
Assessment Agreement substantially in the form
of the Assessment Agreements contained in
Exhibit "B".
- 4 -
e
VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.1. SUBORDINATION. In order to
facilitate the obtaining of financing for the
construction of the improvements by the
Developer, the City agrees to subordinate its
rights under this Contract to the holder of a
first mortgage.
7.2. NOTICE. Notices shall be given by
U.S. mail or personally delivered; and in the
case of the Developer, to be addressed to or
delivered personally at their address, 1809
Northwestern Avenue, Stillwater, Minnesota
55082; and in the case of the City, addressed
to or delivered personally to the City Hall,
216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota
55082. The City and the Developer may, by
notice given to the other, designate different
addresses to which subsequent notices will be
sent.
VIII. EVENTS OF DEFAULT
e
8.1. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. The following
shall be events of default under this
Contract:
a. Failure by the Developer to pay when
due any real estate taxes and special
assessments duly levied by the appropriate
taxing jurisdictions, in an amount based upon
a market value of at least the amounts set
forth in Exhibit "B" of this Contract.
b. Failure by the Developer to provide
and maintain adequate fire and property damage
insurance or failure by the Developer to
reconstruct the improvements in the event of
their destruction.
c. Failure by the Developer to secure
plan approval or zoning and subdivision
approval from the City of Stillwater.
d. Failure by the Developer to commence
and complete construction of the improvements
pursuant to the terms and conditions of this
Contract.
e
e. The failure to meet any condition
precedent set forth in Article VI of this
Contract.
- 5 -
e
8.2. REMEDIES ON DEFAULT. When an event
of default occurs, the City may take one or
more of the following actions:
a. Suspend its performance under this
Contract until it receives assurances from the
Developer that it will cure its default and
continue its performance under the Contract.
b. Withhold the Certificate of
Completion.
c. Withhold any installment of the tax
increment payments due under Section 4.2 of
this Contract.
d. Terminate the Contract, thereby
rendering void any covenants, promises or
approvals contained in this Contract,
including payment of any future installments
of Tax Increments promised under Section 4.2
of this Contract.
e
e. Take whatever action, including
legal, equitable or administrative action,
necessary to protect the City, including the
right of the City to collect any unpaid public
costs associated with the project by
certifying the total of such costs in the year
in which they are due to the County Auditor
for collection with the real estate taxes.
IX. EXPIRATION DATE
9.1. EXPIRATION DATE. This Contract
shall expire upon an event of default as
defined in Section VIII of this Contractt or
if all conditions precedent to the City's
responsibility pursuant to Section VI of this
Contract have not been substantially completed
within one year from the effective date of
this Contract, or upon the final payment to
the Developer of the tax increment payments
set forth in Section 4.2 of this Contract,
whichever occurs first.
X. EFFECTIVE DATE
10.1. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Contract
shall be effective November 8, 1990.
e
- 6 -
e
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this
Contract to be executed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officers and sealed with its
corporate seal; and the Developer has executed this
Contract the day and year first above written.
CITY OF STILLWATER
By
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
and
By
Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk
DEVELOPER
By
C. R. Hackworthy, Managing General
Partner, Curve Crest Properties II, a
Minnesota General Partnership
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
e
On this day of ,
1990, before me, a Notary Public within and for
said County, appeared Wally Abrahamson and Mary Lou
Johnson, to me personally known, who being by me
duly sworn, did say that they are, respectively,
the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Stillwater,
and that this instrument was signed and sealed in
behalf of the City by authority of its City
Council, and they acknowledge that said instrument
was the free act and deed of the City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
On this day of ,
1990, before me, a Notary Public within and for
said County, appeared C. R. Hackworthy, to me
personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did
say that he is the Managing General Partner of the
Developer named in the foregoing instrument and
that this instrument was signed as the free act and
deed of the Developer.
e
Notary Public
- 7 -
e
EXHIBIT "A"
l'hoM 464.)110
IXJNC.IIUI.T
Minn. Rei. No. 6611
Wis. Nt'I. No. 5.9$0
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
M^ll.ItlO ^I)UkESS:
1'.n.I)"). )1
1:",(\1 I.ah, MH. $SOU
HULT & ASSOCIATES. INC. DALE F. HEbEISE"
land Surveyors Minn. Rq. NO. IU90
669' ule Bouln.,"
tOKEST LAKE. MINN. n01, TERRANCe Q. JOHNSON
Mln... RCI. No. IJlU
I hereby n:rlHy thai Ihi~ ~urvC'y. plan, or ,cporl WiI!'I pn:parcd by me or under ",y dir<<I super.
vi~~ and Ihal I am a duly RegiSl~red land Surveyor under Ihe laws of Ihe Slale of Minnesola.
~~,-::F-.~~ Dale October 11. 1990 Scale: I Incl. -~eel
. DENOTES IRON PIPE FOUND
o DENOTES IRON PIPE SET
H."'2I'U.W.
320.11
.;
Z
iii
>
c(
oJ
oJ
UI
II:
o
Z
'"
c(
Q
UI
to
~
oJ
~
..
I-
o
-'
I-
:>
~
~
..
;.
~
~
w
z
:;
ui
..
n
f
.
..,
e
~
o~
~..
;, ..
~"
:i
102211 SQ. FT.
....
...
S
.
..
..
..
..;
~
s
....
..
.
...
iii
~
:z
o
t-
C)
:z
i:
II)
ui oC(
~~ ::
....
\:....
vi
S. LINE oUrLOT A
N.""2O'2"W.
2'''''
.'
CURVE CREST BLVD" (PLATTED. AS,URD. ST. N.)
"NOT BUILT"
PART OF OUTLOT A, STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
SURVEY FOR: . CON/SPEC CORPORATION, Stillwater, MN 55092
LEGAL DESCHIPTlON' (DroDosed as reauested by cllenU
That part or the South 344.88 feet of Outlot A, STILLWATER INDUSTRiAl PARK,
Washington County, Minnesota, lying east of the West 386.97 feet thereof.
Subject to ami together with any valid easements, restrIctions and
rcservat ions.
e
8
e
EXHIBIT "B" ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AND
ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATE
Between
THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA,
and
CURVE CREST PROPERTIES II,
A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
and
COUNTY ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
-
Drafted by
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
Magnuson & Moberg
Attorneys at Law
324 South Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
e
- 9 -
e
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the 13th day
of November, 1990, between The City of Stillwater,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation (the "City"),
Curve Crest Properties II, a Minnesota General
Partnership (the "Developer"), and the County
Assessor of the County of Washington (the
"Assessor").
WITNESSETH, that
WHEREAS, on or before the date hereof, the
City and Developer have entered into a Contract for
Private Development (the "Development Contract")
regarding certain real property located in the City
of Stillwater, hereinafter referred to as the
"Development Property" and legally described in
Schedule "A" hereto; and
e
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that pursuant to
said Development Contract the Developer will
construct a 18,840 square foot office/ warehouse
building upon the Development Property (the
"Minimum Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to
establish a minimum market value for Development
Property and the Minimum Improvements to be
constructed thereon, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Assessor have
reviewed the preliminary plans and specifications
for the Minimum Improvements which it is
contemplated will be erected;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement,
in consideration of the promises, covenants and
agreements made by each to the other, do hereby
agree as follows:
e
1. Upon substantial completion of
construction of the above-referenced Minimum
Improvements by the Developer, as evidenced by the
delivery to the Developer from the City of the
Certificate of Completion (as defined in the
Development Contract), the minimum market value
which shall be assessed for the Development
Property described in Schedule A, with the Minimum
Improvements constructed
- 10 -
e
thereon, for ad valorem tax purposes shall be
The parties to this
Agreement expect that the construction of the
above-referenced Minimum Improvements will be
completed on or before July 1,1991, but that
substantial completion for purposes of assessment
will be completed by May 1, 1991.
2. The minimum market value herein
established shall be of no further force and effect
and this Agreement shall terminate on the date when
the Development Contract either expires or
terminates.
3. This Agreement, with the Development
Contract, shall be promptly recorded by the
Developer with a copy of Minnesota statutes,
Section 469.177, Subdivision 8, set forth in
Schedule B hereto. The Developer shall pay all
costs of recording.
4. Neither the preambles nor provisions of
this Agreement are intended to, nor shall they be
construed as, modifying the terms of the
Development Contract between the City and the
Developer.
e
5. This Agreement may be simultaneously
executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be an original and all of which shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.
6. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
THE CITY OF STILLWATER,
By
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
and
By
Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk
DEVELOPER
By
C. R. Hackworthy, Managing
General Partner, Curve Crest
Properties II, a Minnesota
General Partnership
e
- 11 -
e
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
On this day of , 1990,
before me, a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeared Wally Abrahamson and
Mary Lou Johnson, to me personally known, who,
being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the
Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Stillwater,
that this instrument was signed on behalf of the
City by authority of its Council; and the Mayor and
City Clerk acknowledged the instrument to be the
free act and deed of the City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
e
On this day of , 1990,
before me, a Notary Public within and for said
County, personally appeared C. R. Hackworthy, to me
personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did
say that he is the Managing General Partner of the
Developer, that this instrument was signed on
behalf of the Developer and
C. R. Hackworthy acknowledged this instrument to be
the free act and deed of the Developer.
Notary Public
e
- 12 -
e
CERTIFICATION BY COUNTY ASSESSOR
The undersigned, having reviewed the plans and
specifications for the improvements to be
constructed and the market value assigned to the
land upon which the improvements are to be
constructed, and being of the opinion that the
minimum market value contained in the foregoing
Agreement appears reasonable, hereby certified as
follows: The undersigned Assessor, being legally
responsible for the assessment of the property
described in Schedule "A", hereby certifies that
the market value assigned to such land and
improvements upon completion of the improvements to
be constructed thereon shall not be less than
until
termination of this Agreement.
J. Scott Renne
County Assessor, Washington
County
e
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged
before me this day of ,
1990, by J. Scott Renne, County Assessor of the
County of Washington.
Notary Public
e
- 13 -
Schedule "A"
e
..ltOnf.....JI.JO
nONC.flUI,r
Minn. Rf'I. No. Mil
WIt. Hr,. fIfo. $."0
"'AII.U'O ^UUI\l!.SS:
I',n. lion )J
rurnf ....r. MH. "on
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
HULT & ASSOCIATES, INo.
lnnd Surveyors
Mt, bh bet.lrUf.
HlkesT LAKe. MINH. 'lOll
UAL8 Po HEU!ISCtl
M........ tIo. Ill"
TEkk^J<CB O.IOIlHSOH
"..... lie.. .... 11111
1 hClchy (frilly Ihllt Ihl! ""vcr, 1,lnn, or rtl'O" WAI prcf1:ucd by me' or under PI)' dirtcl IUI1(I.
vi~, and Ihat I nm n duly RClistcrcd Lind Survf10r under ,he laws or the Stile of Minnesota.
d-..&::--F-.~J........ . n.,. October 11. 1990 Scal.: IIMh -~..,
. . DEHOTESII10N PIPE fOUND
0 DENOTES IRON PIPI lET
N....ln'.w
3io.1I ,;
t-
o
0 I
..
0
~. I f
~ ~
.. I
0 , ,
"' ..,
z
;; ..
w I 'I
:::
L ..
,
e 102211 SQ. FT. ..
t ~ :t l;
~ .. ~ D
'b ..
::i ..
,
oJ
i'
oJ
~
...
...
III
II:
o
:I:
III
0(
o
III
to
!(
oJ
e:.
w
~
2:
o
...
C)
2:
i:
en
~
t..
\:j
So.
B. INE ou ILOI ^
N....u.n.w.
Ito.1I .
.'
CURVE CREST BLVD. (PLATTED,AS URD. ST. N.)
.
'Nor BUilT'
PART OF OUTLOT A. STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL PARK.
WASJIINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
SURVEY rOil: 'CON/SPEC CORPORATION, SlIlIwater, MN 55092
LEGAL lJESCBIPTlOU- (IIroDosed as reouesled ~y cllenD
That part o/the South 344.88 reet of OUllot A. STILL WATER INDUSTRiAl PAIl!<.
Washington County,l-lInnesota, lying east of the West 386.97 feet (hereof.
Subjecllo and together wllh any valid easements, restrIctions and
reservations.
e
14
I:.:.~"
, ~,.
,...,' ..
e
e
e
Schedule "B"
section 469.177, Subd. 8. Assessment agreements. An
authority may, upon entering into a development or redevelopment
agreement pursuant to section 469.176, subdivision 5, enter into
a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the
developer or redeveloper of property within the tax increment
financing district which establishes a minimum market value of
the land and completed improvements to be constructed thereon
until a specified termination date, which date shall be not later
than the date upon which tax increment will no longer be remitted
to the authority pursuant to section 469.176, subdivision 1. The
assessment agreement shall be presented to the county assessor,
or city assessor having the powers of the county assessor, of the
jurisdiction in which the tax increment financing district is
located. The assessor shall review the plans and specifications
for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value
previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are
to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value
contained in the assessment agreement appears, in the judgment of
the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, shall execute the
following certification upon such agreement:
The undersigned assessor, being legally
responsible for the assessment of xhe above-
described property upon completion of the
improvements to be constructed thereon,
hereby certifies that the market value _
assigned to such land and improvements upon
completion shall not be less than
$
Upon transfer of title of the land to be developed or
redeveloped from the authority to the developer or redeveloper,
such assessment agreement, together with a copy of this
subdivision, shall be filed for record and recorded in the office
of. the county recorder or filed in the office of the registrar of
titles of the county where the real estate or any part thereof is
situ~ted. Upon completion of the improvements by the developer
or r~developer, the assessor shall value the property pursuant to
Section 273.11, except that the market value assigned thereto
shall not be less than the minimum market value contained in the
assessment agreement. Nothing herein shall limit the discretion
of the assessor to assign a market.value to the property in
excess of the minimum market value contained in the assessment
agreement nor prohibit the developer or redeveloper from seeking,
through the exercise of administrative and legal remedies, a
reduction in market value for property tax purposes; provided,
however, that the developer or redeveloper shall not seek, nor
shall the city assessor, the county assessor, the county auditor,
any board of review, any board of equalization, the commissioner
of revenue or any court of this state grant a reduction of the
market value below the minimum market value contained in the
- 15 -
.i/
/
,
e
assessment agreement during the term of the agreement filed of
record regardless of actual market values which may result from
incomplete construction of improvements, destruction or
diminution by any cause, insured or uninsured, except in the case
of acquisition or reacquisition of the property by a public
entity. Recording or filing of an assessment agreement complying
with the terms of this subdivision shall constitute notice of the
agreement to any subsequent purchaser or encumbrancer of the land
or any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall
be binding upon them.
e
e
- 16 -
e
EXHIBIT "c"
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, a
municipal corporation (the "City") entered into a
certain Contract for Development with Curve Crest
Properties II, a Minnesota Partnership (the
"Developer"), dated as of November 13, 1990, (the
"Agreement") and recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in and
for the County'of Washington and State of Minnesota,
as Document Number , which provided for
the development of the following land described in
Schedule "A" in the County of Washington and State
of Minnesota, to-wit (such tract or parcel of land
hereinafter referred to as the "Property").
NOW THEREFORE, this is to certify that all
building construction and other physical
improvements specified to be done and made by the
Developer have been completed.
day of
Dated this
199
e
THE CITY OF STILLWATER
By
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
By
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SSe
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
On this day of ,
19 ,before me, a notary public within and for said
county, personally appeared Wally Abrahamson and
Mary Lou Johnson, to me personally known, who, being
by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor
and City Clerk of the City of Stillwater, that said
instrument was signed on behalf of said City by
authority of its Council; and said Mayor and City
Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free
act and deed of said City.
e
Notary Public
- 17 -
-
Stillwater City Council
Mr. Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
Stillwater City Hall
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
October 30, 1990
Dear Sirs,
We the Greens Townhouse homeowners who live on McKusick Road
Lane North, wish to petition the City of Stillwater to transfer
title to the road which services our townhouses to the City. The
Certificate of Title lists the road as Outlot A,B and C, The
Greens Townhouses on Oak Glen, Certificate # 36190.
We have discussed and received support from Mr. Dave
Johnson, Oak Glenn Development Co. and Mr. Homer Brusseman,
Brusseman Construction Co.
e
Our reasons are primarily based on our feel ins that the road
really is no different from other city roads servicins homes and
therefore we can benefit from the maintanence and snowplowinS
services offered other residents. The road has not cost the city
to build and therefore the financial impact on the city would be
minimal.
We appreciate your ~onsideration of this matter.
ru~
Charies A. Buehler
President
Greens Townhouse Assn.
1365 McKusick Rd. Ln. No.
430-0292
cc. Mr. Homer Brusseman
Brusseman Contruction Co.
3564 Rollins View Dr.
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
e
Mr. Dave Johnson
Oak Glenn Development Co.
1599 McKusick R.
Stillwater, MN 55082
~
e
e
e
(
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
Ann Pung-Terewdo, Planner
DA:
November 6, 1990
RE:
FEASIBILITY STUDY ON ADAPTIVE REUSE OF THE STILLWATER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Last March the Heritage Preservation Commission did historical research on both
the east and west wings of the Stillwater Junior High School facility. A letter
was then sent to the school district outlining the historical information and
suggesting that a reuse study be considered if the Junior High School is vacated.
One such organization suggested for their information was the Minnestoa
Preservation Commission Consultation Team developed by the Preservation Alliance
of Minnestoa and the Minnestoa Historical Society. This public professional
organization consults on the feasibility of reuse of threatened buildings. A
memo was sent to Council outlining this letter.
The following outline has been drafted by the school district with my assistance
after meeting with a representative from the Minnestoa Historical Society.
The study will objectively review the facility and their recommendations will
be based on the evaluation of the community needs and costs to adaptively reuse
the Junior HIgh School Facility. Demolition is a possibility if the study show
that adaptive reuse is not economically feasible:
Feasibility Study on Adaptive Reuse of the Stillwater Junior High School
1. If the December 11, 1990, Secondary School Bond Issue passes, the
Stillwater Area School Board will request that the Preservation
Alliance of Minnestoa and Minnesota Historical Society organize a
Minnesota Preservation Commission Consultation Team to do a
feasibility study on adaptive reuse of Stillwater Junior High School.
2. The School Board will seek involvement and cooperation of the City
of Stillwater and the Heritage Preservation Commission in the
feasibility study.
3. The objective for a Feasibility Study of the Stillwater Junior High
School will be to identify practical possibilities of adaptive reuse
of the structures through the process of:
A. Identification
a)
To identify the existing conditions of the Junior
High School {i. e., structural conditions, existing
use, parking, neighborhood setting, heating systems
and pool}.
To identify local county and regional civic and
private groups and foundations.
b}
c)
d)
To identify the history of the Stillwater Junior
High complex.
Identify historic contexts which may include
heritage of schools located on the site,
neighborhood presence, architectural importance,
architecture in relation to other facilities of
this type in the Midwest.
B. valuation
C.
)
)
)
)
To assess the future condi tions and cost to
maintain each specific facility at the Junior High
School.
To evaluate facility needs of local, county,
regional, civic, private groups and foundations.
To evaluate the historic significance of the Junior
High School through the identification of historic
contexts.
Recommendations
To recommend adaptive reuse possibilities of the
Junior High School through the evaluation of the
present and future conditions of the complex and
the needs of local, county, regional, civic groups
and private foundations.
To identify costs to adaptively reuse the Junior
High Complex according to the specific needs.
D. lIDln The independent study, funded through
ooperative efforts, would be initiated upon passage of
he December 11, 1990, school bond issue. The Minnesota
reservation Commission Consultation Team would be asked
o report their findings and recommendations by June 1,
991.
E. ndin - It will be the intent of the School Board to
eek cooperative funding of the project from the City
f Stillwater and other agencies, and/or local foundation
ources having an inherent interest in the study. It
s anticipated hat the study will cost $10,000 - $20,000.
4. Consultation with a representative from the Minnesota Historical
Society indi ates that the composition of the Preservation Commission
Consultation Team will include people representing expertise from
areas such a
SHPO S ate Architect
Histor c Consultant
Struct ral Engineer
Profes ional Planner
Housing Specialist
Human Services Specialist
Architect, Cost Analysis
"
e
e
e
e
e
e
~.
5.
The Consultation Team usually works with a community focus or
steering committee of 10 - 12 people representing such interest as:
Neighborhoodresident
School Administration
Stillwater City Council
Seniors Coalition
School Board
Arts/Humanities Coalition
Recreation Director
(City of School)
StillwaterPlanningCommissioner
Human Services Representative
Chamber of Commerce
Building Construction
Stillwater Heritage Preservation
Commission
,
~SeH
e ENCINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5I PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612490-2000
November 7, 1990
RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
FOREST HILLS/TH 36
FRONTAGE ROAD
CITY PROJECT NO, L.I. 251
SEH FILE NO. 88200
e
Mr. Nile Kriesel
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Nile:
Attached are two copies of the sixth and final application for
payment from Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $72,533.69.
Also attached are copies of: 1) the Consent of Surety for final
payment, 2) IC134, 3) certified tax statements and 4) final lien
waivers. We have reviewed the application and have determined it
to be correct.
We reviewed the project with representatives of the City and, to
the best of our knowledge, find the project was constructed in
accordance with the intent of the plans and specifications.
We recommend that the project be accepted by the City for
maintenance and recommend payment of the application.
SB;J: 11-
BCP/cmb
Attachments
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
e
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC
ST. PAUL,
MINNESOTA
CHIPPEWA FALLS,
WISCONSIN
t-
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
..".....,. -"'\ tr' <;""4 "i"'" ,,\7 .~::' n
k FJ 1\ . fA ,1 V ~-'., l.lj
J;' \:~}~ ~_,: '::.'_.J ,.!~ .-.
1. [' 1 T('"- 1 '1~1::.._'.:.~M.,.t\,!'_:~..\'.S~.')~'t \NC..
SHOR .c.,U! - - . .
-------------------------
NO. 6
N OV ;) 1990
e
(UNIT PRICE CONTRACT)
FINAL
......-,. p..1,-.'H'
.... ,'>' . ,'-~
OWNER: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO. L.I. 251
------------------------------------ -------------------
ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 88200
LOCATION: SOUTH GREELEY ARE}
-------------------------------
CONTRACTOR RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. CONTRACT DATE
------------------------------- -------------------------
12585 RHODE ISLAND AVE. SO.
CONTRACT AMOUNT $526,562.89
-------------------------------
SAVAGE, MN 55378
-------------------------------
CONTR. FOR FOREST HILLS FRONTAGE ROAD - SAN. SWR, WATERMAIN, ST. SEWER, STREETS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLIC.DATE ovember 1 19 0
___Ji________~___________
PERIOD END. 31 19 0
----Q~~~~----~----------
e
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
-----------------------
CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO. DATE PRICE TOTAL
----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
SANITARY SEWER
1 CUT INTO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 1 1 312.00 $ 312.00
2 8" PVC, 0'-8' DEEP L.F. 44 47 7.80 $ 366.60
3 8" PVC, 8'-10' DEE p L.F. 602 581 8.48 $ 4,926.88
4 8" PVC, 10'-12'DEE p L.F. 658 575 10.26 $ 5,899.50
5 8" PVC, 12'-14'DEE P L.F. 1085 1430 12.05 $ 17,231.50
6 8" PVC, 14'-16'DEE P L.F. 349 148 14.48 $ 2,143.04
7 8" PVC, 16'-18'DEE p L.F. 150 124 17.67 $ 2,191.08
8 8" PVC, 18'-20'DEE p L.F. 57 50 21.30 $ 1,065.0<4t
PAGE 1 OF 6 SHOR r-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. $34,135.60
~
9
8" DIP SEWER, 8'-10'DEEP L.F.
e
8" DIP SEWER, 14'-16'DEEP L.F.
11
8" DIP SEWER, 16'-18'DEEP L.F.
12
8" DIP SEWER, 18'-20'DEEP L.F.
13
8" DIP SEWER, 20'-22'DEEP L.F.
14
8" DIP SEWER, 22'-24'DEEP L.F.
15
8" DIP SEWER, 24'-26'DEEP L.F.
16
8" DIP SEWER, 26'-28'DEEP L.F.
17
STANDARD MANHOLE, 8' DEEP EACH
EXCESS DEPTH STD MANHOLE L.F.
18
19
OUTSIDE DROP SECTION L.F.
20
8" BY 4" PVC WYE
EACH
21
4" PVC SERVICE
L.F.
WATERMAIN
=-
23
CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN EACH
6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F.
24
8" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F.
25
8" DIP SERVICE, CL 52 L.F.
26
12" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F.
27
6" R.S.GATE VALVE & BOX EACH
28
8" R.S.GATE VALVE & BOX EACH
29
30
12" B.F.VALVE & BOX EACH
8" X 8" TAPPING SLEEVE,
8" G.V. & BOX EACH
31
DIP FITTINGS
LB.
32
EACH
FIRE HYDRANT
33
1" COPPER SERVICE
L.F.
3.
1" CORPORATION
EACH
36
12
18
25
18
4
35
6
8
16
54
6
12
10
17
51.98 62.40
25.94 25.94
1
1
35
35
1 1
109 153
685 685
365 436
4041 4024
10
9
10
11
5
4
1
1
3927 3868
10
25
10
25
1
1
PAGE 2 OF 6
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
20.00 $
11. 63 $
20.00
407.05
262.00 $ 262.00
15.46 $ 2,365.38
13.42 $ 9,192. 70
17.72 $ 7,725.92
19.15 $ 77,059.60
308.70 $ 2,778.30
415.73 $ 4,157.30
710.40 $ 2,841.60
1,186.00 $ 1,186.00
1.81 $ 7,001.08
918.40 $ 9,184.00
11.40 $ 285.00
108.00 $ 108.00
$142,259.97
~
.,'fff....
35 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 1 1 83.00 $83.00
STORM SEWER e
36 12" RCP ST. SEWER, CL V L.F. 550 539.80 16.32 $8,809.54
37 15" RCP ST. SEWER, CL II L.F. 170 195 15.96 $3,112.20
38 15" RCP ST. SEWER, CL V L.F. 414 414 21.21 $8,780.94
39 18" RCP STORM SEW L.F. 58 56 19.38 $1,085.28
CL II
40 21" RCP STORM SEW L.F. 694 699.50 19.24 $13,458.38
CL III
41 24" RCP STORM SEW L.F. 410 387 21.50 $8,320.50
CL III
42 24" RCP STORM SEW CL V L.F. 648 163 52.60 $8,573.80
43 27" RCP STORM SEW L.F. 414 867 23.99 $20,799.33
CL III
44 30" RCP STORM L.F. 67 64 25.33 $1,621.12
CL III
45 36" RCP STORM L.F. 72 34.51 $ -- e
CL III
46 15" R.C. APRON WITRASH EACH 1 1 386.00 $ 386.00
GUARD
47 18" R.C. APRON WIT EACH 1 1 450.00 $450.00
GUARD
48 24" R.C. APRON WIT EACH 2 1 547.00 $547.00
GUARD
49 27" R.C. APRON WIT EACH 1 1 681.00 $ 681. 00
GUARD
50 30" R.C. APRON WIT EACH 1 1 777.00 $ 777.00
GUARD
51 36" R.C. APRON WIT ASH EACH 2 1,036.50 $ --
GUARD
52 MANHOLE, TYPE B L.F. 92.3 75 92.17 $ 6,912.75
53 MANHOLE, TYPE C L.F. 52.1 23.1 158.85 $ 3,669.44
54 CATCH BASIN, TYPE L.F. 12.3 9 145.93 $ 1,313.37 e
PAGE 3 OF 6 SHOR -ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. $89,380.65
f
-,
55 CATCH BASIN, TYPE X L.F. 24.31 24.1 102.06 $ 2,459.65
~ CATCH BASIN, TYPE Y L.F. 17.11 18.6 117.12 $ 2,178.43
R 1733 MH CASTING EACH 15.00 15 136.20 $ 2,043.00
58 R 3067 CB CASTING EACH 12.00 12 214.00 $ 2,568.00
59 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE TON 600.00 25.19 7.62 $ 191.95
SUBGRADE BACKFILL
60 SOLID ROCK EXCAVATION C.Y. 53.00 20.26 $
61 LOOSE ROCK EXCAVATION C.Y. 192.00 8.04 $
62 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAV (P) C.Y. 19280.00 9.280 1.20 $ 11,136.00
63 COMMON CHANNEL EXCAV (P) C.Y. 346.00 2.42 $
64 GROUTED RIPRAP C.Y. 40.70 35 46.24 $ 1,618.40
65 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE 4 S. Y. 90.80 80 2.08 $ 166.40
66 SODDING S. Y. 22.00 1140 3.00 $ 3,420.00
67 SEEDING, MIX. TYPE SPEC. ACRE 2.00 1.6 1,000.00 $ 1,600.00
68 SEEDING, MIXTURE TYPE 500 ACRE 1.50 2.0 700.00 $ 1,400.00
- TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V. ) C.Y. 500.00 647 7.60 $ 4,917.2Q
70 SPRUCE, COLORADO GREEN TREE 17.00 17 180.00 $ 3,060.00
6' HI B&B
71 PINE, AUSTRIAN 4' HI B&B TREE 12.00 150.00 $
72 MAPLE, NORTHWOOD 2" CAL. TREE 20.00 14 275.00 $ 3,850.00
B&B
73 LILAC, COMMON PURPLE SHRUB 240.00 24.00 $
18" HI B&B
74 SHRUB MULCH S.F. 480.00 2391 0.25 $ 597.75
ROADWAY
75 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 1 13,680.00 $ 13,680.00
76 CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. .1 1 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00
77 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. 14779 14,779 1.20 $ 17,734.80
78 SELECT GRAN BORROW (L.V.) C.Y. 850 5.50 $
7_ TOPSOIL BORROW (L. V. ) C.Y. 500 122 7.60 $ 927.20
PAGE 4 OF 6 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. $77,548.78
''----I
,.
,-
3.;\ '4 \ 3.. ~1
80 AGG. BASE CL 5 100% TON 4270 5002.11 6.48 $ 32,41J.&8
CRUSHED
81 BIT. MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON 132.1 131. 64 125.00 $ 16,455.0_
82 BASE COURSE MIXTU E TON 1180 1285.18 11.00 $ 14,136.98
83 WEARING COURSE MI TON 1180 1169.47 12.00 $ 14,033.64
84 BIT MATL FOR TACK GAL. 535 308 1.30 $ 400.40
85 CONCRETE CURB & G L.F. 5667 5653 4.27 $ 24,138.31
DES B618
86 SEEDING, MIXTURE 500 ACRE 1 2.51 700.00 $ 1,757.00
7 4" CONCRETE SIDEWPiLK S.F. 13035 12,326 1.26 $15,530.76
88 8" CONCRETE S.Y. 405 98 23.69 $ 2,321.62
89 6" CONC. PATCH S. Y. 60 60 56.18 $ 3,370.80
W/REINFORCE.
$124,558.19
e
e
PAGE 6 OF 6
SHORT-ELLIO T-HENDRICKSON, INC.
f~~LICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continuer
~ " t
Tota 1 Contract Amount $ 1)26.562.89
Total Amount Earned
4 fo"1 B83. l1
$ 467,883.19--
Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incoporated into Work
~Contract Change Order No.
Contract Change Order No.
Contract Change Order No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Percent.Complete
Percent Complete
Percent Complete
100%
100%
100%
100%
lOO~
100%
GROSS AMOUNT DUE...............
LESS % RETAINAGE.........
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE.............
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS.....
AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION....
649,911. 61 V
,"2.. S33 .(; 4-
72, S3J.--7
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress.
payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to
above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under-
signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said
contract, and (2) all
material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this
Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and
encumbrances.
/1IUJ/.gJ70~ ,19 90 persona lly appea red
~ known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose
Q , ~ of the Contractor above mentioned;
Office
that he executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor;
and that all of the sLat~Jlt~~Ri~ . r rue, correct and c lete.
.r-:: ---~N M. V EUlEN l
My Commi ss i on Expi rej Notary PubIlc - Mlnneaota
~ Hennepin Co.unty _ No ta ry 1 , c
"~w ..,..M'tJ~~mfr:o~~XP!~~~..-
The undersigned has checked the Contractor's Application for Payment shown above. A part of
this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him
under this Contract have been applied by him to discharge in full all of his obligations in
connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment.
In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the
~ount Due.
_ated
///;
COUNTY OF ~~ ' )
STATE OF /) 'PlvtYJ.rc..<... )
'/'_W
3efore me on this . ~~
, 1990.
By
SS
lnd say that he is
Date
No,",
6
~ . /q 96
(
Page
of
6
SHORT ~OTT HENO~~. INC.
By c5 (~
e
-
-
..
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 8395
Ace Hardware
Action Rental
American Linen Supply Co.
Anchor Paper Company
Anderson Sod
A T & T
A T & T
Ax Man
Beberg, Byrdie
Bell, Timothy
Boyum Equipment Company
Brown's Ice Cream Company
Bryan Rock Products
Capital Communications
Cemstone Products Company
Cobb Group
Copy Duplicating
Courier, The
Croixland Excavating
Croix oil Company
Croixside Press
Crysteel Distributing Inc.
C. W. Houle, Inc.
DAC Industries
Deblon, Diane
Delegard Corporation
Dorsey - whitney
Equipment Supply Inc.
Fire Engineering
First Trust
Forecast Public Artworks
Fred's Tire Company
Frito - Lay, Inc.
Fritz Company, Inc.
Gannon's Auto Body
Glaser, Paul
Glass Service Company
Goodyear Auto Service
Goodwill Industries
Gordon Iron and Metal
Greeder Electric Company
G & K Services
Gun N Smith
Hertz Furniture
Holmsten Rink Master
Supplies $
Concrete
Linen Service
Paper
Sod-Storm Sewer Work
Lease/Rentals
Leased Equipment
5 Cases-Election
Computer Entrys
Expenses-Chief's Conf.
Guage
Concession Supplies
Crushed Rock
Battery/Repairs
Concrete
Subscription-Word Perfect
Developer
Publications
Sidewalks/Storm Sewer
Oil
Permit Forms
Moldboard Plow
Estimate No. 1
Solvent
Mileage/Health Insurance
Supplies
Legal Services
Service Maintenance
Subscription
Fee-Destroy Securities
Entry Plan-Downtown
Tire/Tube
Concession Supplies
Concession Supplies
Paint Truck
Boiler Engineer
Replace Windshield
24 Tires-Police
October Expenses
Channel Iron
Brick Street Lift/Lights
Uniform Rental
Supplies
Tab le
Netting/Slushice
42.19
308.72
14.00
81.49
3 1. 50
146.20
47.42
75.00
367.50
228.80
11. 77
53 .45
35.29
233.85
126.00
59.00
140.00
1,458.93
715.00
215.05
234.50
6,744.00
57,911. 65
540.17
218.75
104.45
2,530.20
1,213.00
21. 95
63.82
2,200.00
191.30
89.34
667.80
500.00
200.00
164 . 54
956.44
507.34
26.00
3 54 . 40
819.37
141. 76
94 . 95
712.93
Intoximeters, Inc.
I. B. M. corporatio
Interstate Diesel C .
J. H. Larson Electr"c
J. L. Shiely Compan
Johnson, Mary Lou
Junker Recycling Se
Junker Sanitation S
Kress, Kenneth
Lace Company
Lakes Gas Company
Lind, Leslie and Gl
Mackall, Crounse an
Magnuson, David
Mac Donald, William C.
Metropolitan Counci
Mexicali Company
Miller, Davin
Miller, Leo
Miller Excavating,
Minnesota Cellular
Mn. City Management
~m. Dept. Public Sa
Mn. Dept. Public Sa
Mn. Playground, Inc
Minnesota Correctio
MTI Distributing Co
Minnesota UC Fund
Moodys Investors Se
Moore Business Prod
Motorola, Inc.
Multi - Print
Northern States Pow
Northern States Pow
Northeast Metropoli
Nordquist, Richard
Norwest Insurance A
N. W. Tire and Batt
Pepsi - Cola Compan
Pony Express Reload rs
P. O. S. T.
P. E. R. A.
Public Safety Equip
Reliable Corporatio
RGT Investments
Road Rescue
Roettger Welding
Russell, Stephen
nc.
elephone
ety
ety
al Facility
pany
ency
ry Co.
ent
Mouth Pieces
Tape Support
Gasket
Ballast/shatter shield
Sand
Cookies/Mileage
Recycling
Lily Lake Clean-up
Materials-Voting Machine
Supplies
Propane
Land Purchase
TIF Districts
Legal Services
Refund-Garbage
Aerial Photos
Refund #251
Meals
Meals
Storm Sewer, Rock
Mobil Phone
Dues-Kriesel
CJDN Connect Charge/Terminal
Death Investigation Course
FIBAR Material
Code Cards
Equipment Parts
Unemployment
Bond Rating
Receipt Forms
Service Agreement
Paper
Energy Charge
Street Lighting/Lily Lake
Tuition - Monio
Meals/Mileage
Bond - Deblon
Alignment
Concession Supplies
Reloads
License - Serier
Interest-Tice/Kress
Calibrate 5 Radar Units
Tape/Staple Remover
Refund 251
4 Switches
Welding
Meeting Expenses
"
48.00
514 . 10
3.76
675.34
214 . 75
7.98
6,594.00
1,968.75
54 .88
3 51. 86
231.00
927.00
3,276.75
10,061.20
51.00
36.00
e
1,659.62
34.49
28.07
228.23
10 . 82
40.00
330.00
60.00
2,698.50
11.00
133 . 26
736.84
4,000.00
370.14
267.00
3.50
5,918.38
10,627.93
125.00
23 . 94
100.00
28.67
400.50
87.00
5.00
41.27
100.00
14.51
2,052.68
23. 88
1,285.00
20.00
e
e
e
-
--
J
Safety - Kleen Corp.
St. Croix Animal Shelter
St. Croix Recreation
st. Paul Stamp works
Schrade, Len
Schwantes, Inc.
Sewer Equipment of America
Short, Elliott, Hendrickson
Snyder Bros.
Spec Materials
Springsted
Stafford, R. H. Washington
County Treasurer
Stefan Associates
Stevensen, James
Stillwater Gazette
StillH20 Inc.
Stillwater Photo
Suburban Propane
T. A. Schifsky & Sons
Thompson Hardware Inc.
Uniforms Unlimited
united Building Centers
U. S. West Communications
Universal Medical Services
Valley Auto Supply, Inc.
Viking Office Products
l;<{MI Services
Watson, Dennis
Wausau Title, Inc.
Wybrite, Inc.
Yocum Oil Company
Zee Medical Service
Ziegler, Inc.
MANUAL CHECKS
Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Government Training Service
Government Training Service
Hastings Automotive
Junker Sanitation Service
Postmaster
State Treasurer
Stafford,R. H. Cty.Treasurer
Stafford,R. H. Cty.Treasurer
Steiner, Robert J.
Agreement-Parts Washer
October Fees
Steel Columns
Dog Tags
Expenses-Chief's Conf.
Furnace Repairs
Skids for Root Cutter
Engineering
Cat Food/Batteries
Router Bits/Pins
Bond Services
Striping of Streets
Drawing Bridge Plans
Expenses-Chief's Conf.
Election Notice
Sewer Line Cleaning
Film/Processing
Propane
Blacktop
Supplies
Uniforms
Lumber/Concrete/Timbers
Telephone Services
Light for Squad
Auto Parts
Office Supplies
Rental Units
Programming
Can Liners
Mte. Agreement
Fuel Oil/Pump Out Tank
First Aid Supplies
Battery
October Billing
Seminar-Zepper/Rylander
School - Beberg
4 Squad Cars
October Payment
Postage for Meter
Surcharge
License - 2 Squads
Recording Fee
Settlement 251
;".....
98. '00
580.00
1,708.00
75.00
233.58
45.00
142.40
1, 868.49
22.08
634.80
13 , 090 .42
224.20
293.00
333.30
225.00
82.50
21. 75
105.36
396.22
321.89
1,144.61
378.72
1,251.00
65.00
717 . 87
28.30
530.00
100.00
235.04
158.00
987.77
288.65
175.56
2,006.30
40.00
150.00
50 , 832.00
68,000.00
1,000.00
1,486. 95
1,570.96
10.00
1,125.00
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
Kriesel, Nile
MIl Life, Inc.
Ra - Mar
Service Master
Short Elliott Hendr'ckson
stillwater Fire Rel'ef Assn.
U. S. West Communicctions
Expenses
Term Life Insurance
Back l'V'ate+: Valve
Cleaning-Jacoby
Engineering
Reimburse-Poster Contest
Telephone Service
ADOPTED BY THE COUl~( IL THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990.
APPROVED FOR PAYMEN'
.~,
79.63
1,095.66
85.00
53.00
12,769.49
100.00
477.18
\..
e
--
tit
e
-
-
Carlson Reconstruction
1013 W. Myrtle St.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS
November 13, 1990
General Contractor
Renewal
Carlson Automatic Fire Protec. Fire Protection Systems New
12488 Xenwood Ave.
Savage, Mn. 55378
Carpentry Plus
970 Da i ly Road
Hudson, Wi 54016
North Central Satellite
450 OakGrove Parkway, #102
St. Paul, Mn. 55127
T.G. Peterson Construction
8855 Military Rd.
Woodbury, Mn. 55125
Powers Construction Co., Inc.
2325 Endicott, Suite 6
Mendota Heights, Mn. 55114
Mike Rygh Homes, Inc.
2154 Hastings, Ave.
Newport, Mn. 55055
S & P Construction
1853 Fairmount Ave.
St. Paul, Mn. 55105
State Mechanical, Inc.
5050 W. 220th St.
Farmington, Mn. 55024
Stillwater Fence Co.
8138 Jody Ave. No.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Norvin L. Swager
102 Lakeside Dr.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
General Contractor
Satellite Antenna
Install ati on
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
General Contractor
Excavators
Fencing
General Contractor
New
New
New
New
Renewal
New
Renewal
Renewal
New
e
e
It
" ,...
E UE. 1- . (f
QUU.E. :.:ru'l.j.dh
809 ~ixth c4uWUE. ~ th
~tiLLwatE.'l.J o1l(inn. 55~u8;
-;;:-;;.e: /f r ~ nld?
h {':.--..~ .J' .f;;//'~
J~ ~ >'v...-L ,4 ~
~ /.4-~.-d-r~~~
~ 4-.4--. .~ ~ ~ -----' --/-. ~
. ~
~ ~ ...A.---l ~. -/~,.; ~
~y ~~~'"'7
~ d-~~~~'<
tL ~ ff j ~ /,LJ-.- 7' rL
./ 3-f ~ s: c:;::.,<<.~
___~ ~ 9/1 -
d--- ~~~r~
.~~ ~ ~ -<7' r.e.. ~ e'-'-'-7
. .
~ J~ ~~/~
~~ d'.. ~ r--- ~ ~~.
)/-<- ~ ~ rL ~ rr' k.-
A-L--~ ~ ~~
~
A ~
e
e
-
~-,,;,~~~~
~ " ?A__~. .,4 ~~ ~
r~~~~'
fi~kr~~
'~,
~~~~.
E:A-L ~ ~
h",/, /,. ~~~
e
United States Department of the Interior
neT q
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
P.O. BOX 37127
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127
IN REPLY REFER TO:
018(773)
OCT '-c:' 8 1990
Honorable Rudy Boschwitz
United States Senator
215 Kellogg Square Building
III East Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Dear Senator Boschwitz:
Thank you for forwardi ng the 1 etter from Mayor Abrahamson of St illwater regardi ng
revisions to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources rules for the management
of the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway (your file number 3284550003).
e
The rules in question are a part of the State of Minnesota's management program
for the segment of the Lower St. Croix administered by the State. They were
originally adopted' in early 1976 and included a building setback in developed
areas that is more restrictive than t~e "Model Zoning ,Code II appended to the Lower
St. CrQix Final Management Plan. These rules 'were in place when the Secreti:lry
of the Interior designated the State administered segment in June of 1976. The
specific authority to promulgate these rules resides in the section of Minnesota
Statutes which designates the Lower St. Croix a State scenic river, not the Lower
St. Croix Final Master Plan.
the State's rule making process is the appropriate forum for resolution of this
issue. The National Park Service is, of course, interested in any changes to
the State's management program on the Lower St. Croi x. However, Mayor Abrahamson
is requesting a change to a State requirement which has been in place since 1976.
Questions regarding whether the State's adoption of a requirement more effective
than the guidelines in the Final Master Plan should be resolved through the
procedure established by the State.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Dean
Alexander in our Midwest Regional Office. He may be contacted at 402-221-3481.
Your letter and enclosures are being returned as requested.
Enclosure
-
RUDY BOSCHWITZ
MINNESOTA
tlnitfd ~tatf!; ~fnatf
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2302
October 26, 1990
The Honorable Wally rahamson
Mayor of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth
Stillwater, Minnesot 55082
Dear Mayor Abrahamso
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS:
AGRICULTURE
BUDGET
FOREIGN RELATIONS
SMALL BUSINESS
e
Enclosed is the response I received regarding- t.he management
of the Lower St. Cro'x National Scenic Riverway.
I hope this ans ers SUffi.ck~{'y questions or
you may have had reg rding thi~ matter. \ If everything
been resolved to you satisfa~tion, ple,se let me know
I can do to help. 1 I
1 I
Please feel fre to call\on me f9,f any assistance you may
need .j /
s\cL1Y'
\
Ru1 ~ Bas hwi tz
united St tes Senator
RB/loc
Enclosure
concerns
has not
what more
e
e
e
November 5. 1990
/'11~. Nile Kr-iesel
City o~ Stillwater
216 Fourth Street North
st i 11 wa ter. /'iN. 5-'5082
Dear Nile.
e
[n the Seotember 28th and October 12th Issues 0+ the "League
o~ Cities Bulletin" a.'~ticles appe.:::wed stating that the
l'1innesota Chamber was cal_l.inq -Fo'~ reductIon cw elimination of
state aid -For cit.ies.
The Minnesota Chamber has told me that it has not taken a
position on local Govel-nment Plids. nor will thev until
receivinq inout -From local Chambens of Commerce. Laurie
Hacking who wrote the article conFirmed that the source of
i nEormat ion was not the Ni nnesota Chamber.
Just thought I'd pass this inFormation on to you and YOW'-
council. [suspect that this is not a dead issue however.
5i neerel .\1'.
e
Brick Alley Building. 423 So. Main Street. Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-5127 · (612) 439-7700
~~
(b
o
~.
~
C/7 ~U/) c,- /
e
"lllw.'... PIl~II. LI~
1111.rIUII F.rtlll "Ne'
"111_.. "1M ....
Board of Trustees
Minutes
October 1, 1990
Present: Buck, Chll ds, Doe, Engebretson, Hansen, Ka 11 noff, Schm1 dt,
We I shons, and d1 rector Berta I m1 o.
e
1. The meeting was caned to order at 6:32 pm by Pres1dent Hansen.
2. Absent object lon, agenda was adopted.
3. Moved to approve the mlnutes. SIP.
4. Moved payment of b1lls 1n the amount of $6,577.69. SIP unam1nously.
5. Comm1 t tee reports.
Adm1n1stration - D1rector was excused. Report from Admin1stration
Commi t tee was di scussed. Comm1 t tee moved 1 ts approva 1. SiP
unan1mously. Comm1ttee w1ll d1scuss with D1rector at 4:30 pm
October 2.
Adm1n1stration - Moved to amend photocopier pol1cy Item 5 by adding
"and board members" follow1ng "staff members". SiP.
Budget and Flnance - Dlrector reported that "Truth 1n Taxation" hear1ng
1s scheduled for December 18.
Plannlng and Goals - Chllds presented a proposed structure for
developlng a set of goals and asked for comments. Of note was the
d1 st 1 nct 1 on bet ween 1 ndl v1 dua 1 s act 1 ng as Board members and the
same 1ndiViduals acting as Library volunteers. Both functions are
valuable. He hopes to develop an agenda and call on the Committee
to work on goals for 1991.
Publlc Relatlons - Book bag designer has been selected; hopefully bags
w1ll be ovollable for Christmas sales. New brochure 1S now
avollable. New baby brochure 1S com1ng.
Spec1al Projects - Halloween Celebration - There w1ll be witches
ga lore and a spec1 a I story hour thot day.
WCL L 1 ason - No report.
-
6. Old Bus1ness
A. Adult Programm1ng - Noted rece1pt of contract copy from St. Poul
Foundat10n. Pres1dent Hansen will sign, as previously directed, after
proofreadlng.1
B. Vi deo Cass t te Loan POll cy - Imp 1 ementat ion 11 ke 1 y on November 5.
Forest Lake h s yet to take action. After implementation, publlcity
w111 prl nc1 pa 1 y be done us1 ng handouts and a new app 11 cat 1 on form
that clearly tates the pollcy on all loans.
C. Jolnt Boar Meetlng - Set for Monday, November 26, probably at
Bayport Pub 11 L 1 brary.
D. Public Acc ss Catalog - Noted that we appear to be no closer to
havlng a publ c access catalog than we appeard to be jn 1988. The
ml croft che a proach contl nues to be unsat 1 sf actory.
7. New Busi ness I
A. First Reading on By-laws change to move the regular monthly
Board meetln to the ftrst Tuesday of the month at 6:30 p.m. Hansen
noted that th poll of members showed thj s date to be the unanl mous
cholce. Move that, effectlve with the ftrst meetlng ln 1991,
Article II, 5e tlon 1 be amended by replacing the word Monday wlth
the word Tue day wherever 1 t appears.
B. Meetlng Ro m Pollcy Review - The meetlng room policy was
ref erred to t e Admi ni stratl on Comml ttee for revl ew.
C. Board vacaf,cy Appol ntment Process - The possi bl 1 1 ty of
representatlon from the county outside the clty limlts was
dl scussed. A sent any mot 1 on call 1 ng for change the present POll cy
wll 1 contl nue1
D. MLA Conf e ence - Wl11 be held November 7, 8, 9 1 n St. Cloud.
Requests for eservatjon should be in to Lynne by October 18.
8. President.s rep rt - Reported brlefly on Governor's Whlte House
Conference. e noted that whlle SPL may glve the appearance of
bel ng handl ca ped accessl b 1 e, many handl capped woul d st 111 not be
able to ava11 hemselves of our serv1ces.
9. Dlrector's repo t - Handed out with brlef notes.
1 O. Adjournment /S/P.
Subml t ted:
W. Ves Chl1ds
Secretary
e
e
e
e
AGENVA
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
MONVAY, NOVEMBER yI!E1990 -- 6:15 P.M.
6:15 P.M. AGENVA
I. Sta66 Repa~t~
7:00 P.M. AGENVA
I. Call to O~de~
I I . V -i~ -it 0 ~~
III. Old Bu~-ine~~
Rev-iew Adult Book~to~e O~d-inance
Un-i6o~m Pa~k-ing F-ine~
IV. Rev-iew M-inute~ - Octobe~ 9th & 22nd
-
V. Vepa~tmental Repo~t~
Ke~n - Ut-il-it-ie~
S eg 9 elk.e - Pa~k~
O'Neal - Adm-in-i~t~at-ion
Voe~~ - St~eet~
Somme~6eldt - Pol-ice
VI. New Bu~-ine~~
R-ive~6~ont Cutte~~ S-ign Reque~t
C-itlj Logo
New~lette~
Chambe~ 06 Comme~ce Membe~~h-ip
Counc-il Vacanclj
1991 Boa~d 06 Rev-iew Vate~
VII. B-ill~ P~e~ented 6a~ Paljment & T~~a~u~e~'~ Repo~t
VIII. Co~~e~pondence P~e~ented
MN PCA
Met Co.unc-il
League 06 MN C-it-ie~
Countlj Publ-ic Wo~k~ Vept.
Chambe~ 06 Comme~ce
Met Counc-il
4It ** Tue~dalj, Novembe~ 27th - 7;00 p.m. - Non-un-ion Sala~1j Wo~k.~hop
7:30 p.m. - V-i~cu~~ O~d~nance~ #201 & #203
~
~
'0
"
~.
A PRO
~TION
e
WHEREAS, America's public schools serve all of the children of all of the people; and
WHEREAS, the strength of a community is measured by the schools it keeps; and
WHEREAS, the schools of the 1990s need broad citizen support to meet the diverse needs of
today's families and to help each student achieve his or her potential; and
WHEREAS, educational excellence is built on the involvement of the entire community,
including parents, business leaders, elected officials, public service personnel, and senior citizens,
Now, therefore,
I,
WALLY ABRAHAMSON
IdcUf ~
e
servmg as
MAYOR
of
THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
Do hereby proclaim
4~ t~fJ1)eek
Iv~ 1/-/7;1990
All citizens are urged to observe this week with appropriate activities and to renew
their commitment to the education of every child.
<:;i'.'
, t
Q
.....:
z: ,-
a L,r
., /JA
i
13th
day of
NOVEMBER
,1990
......"
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 55101 612291-6359
November 7, 1990
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: City of Stillwater
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
West Stillwater Business Park Plan
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14835-6
Dear Mr. Russell:
At its meeting on November 1, 1990, the Metrop6litan Council considered the city of Stillwater's
comprehensive plan amendment. This consideration was based on a report of the Metropolitan
and Community Development Committee, Referral Report No. 90-81. A copy of this report is
attached.
e
The Council approved the following recommendations contained in the above report:
1. That the Metropolitan Council adopt the above findings and the staff report as part of
these recommendations. .
2. That the Metropolitan Council approve this plan amendment and that no plan
modification is required.
3. That the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission not
approve extension of metropolitan urban services into the Benson Farm area
until the city of Stillwater and the Minnesota Municipal Board approve the
annexation of this property.
4. That the city of Stillwater undertake an analysis of the potential impacts of 4 million
square feet of development on the regional and local transportation system. Should the
development result in congestion of T.H. 36, the zoning should be changed so as to
only add a level of development that can be accommodated by the present regional
facility. When T.H. 36 is reconstructed, development activity should not exceed the
capacity of the new roadway. This traffic analysis should include the potential build out
of all vacant land or land with redevelopment potential according to the zoning
ordinance. The analysis and resulting change should be incorporated into a complete
revision to the city transportation section of its comprehensive plan.
e
e
e
e
", ..~
Steve Russell
Page 2
5. That the city of Stillwater submit a revised comprehensive plan amendment for the local
transportation system once agreement is reached with Mn/DOT over the design of
T.H. 36.
6. That the city of Stillwater take appropriate action to minimize Mn/DOT exposure
concerning the potential for lawsuits over reduced transportation access in the West
Stillwater Business Park.
7. That the city of Stillwater revise its comprehensive sewer plan base map to show the
area proposed for sanitary sewer service.
8. That the city of Stillwater prepare a comprehensive stormwater management plan that
addresses both water quantity as well as water quality for that area included in the West
Stillwater Business Park.
9.
That the Metropolitan Council encourage the city of Stillwater to submit a city-wide
comprehensive plan amendment that addresses land supply and demand and related
land use issues.
Sincerely,
Sw/L{-
Steve Keefe
Chair
SK:lv
Attachment
cc: R.A Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Steven Schwanke, Metropolitan Council Staff
,.
. ....
{,z//t I b
( I
/~~~~~.LA._~L.~_
0/ S /
-). ,
WASHINGTON COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
GOVERNMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 . STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082.<J006
6121779-5403
Fax machine: 6121779-5498
J. Scott Renne, MAl, CAE
County Assessor
779-5136
Dennis Montague. CMA
Assistant County Assesscr
779-5137
Judith M. Ellis, CMA
Administrative Technician
779-5465
DATE: October 30, 1990
TO: City and Township Clerks, Staff Appraisers, and Local
Assessors
FROM: Scott Renne
SUBJECT:
1991 Board of Review Schedule
Our office is in the early stages of making the schedule for
the 1991 Local Boards of Review. Enclosed is the_ schedule for
1990.
e
Please provide me with any input that you may have for the
schedule, including both first and reconvened meetings. The
statutory requirements are that the Board cannot last more than
twenty days, so the second meeting must be within twenty days of
the first. There should also be enough time between the first
and second meeting for the Local Assessor or Staff Appraiser to
inspect, review, and make a recommendation for the properties
that are under appeal. Generally, seven to ten days is
sufficient time to allow for this with the exception of larger
jurisdictions.
After reviewing last years schedule, our initial inclination
is to "slide it up" one day, meaning that a Board that was on
Monday, April 2, 1990, would be Monday, April 1, 1991 at the same
time.
We will be preparing a Local Board of Review information
booklet that will be distributed to all Clerks and Board members
.in March, 1991. We look forward to working with you in the Local
Board of Review process. Please call Judy Ellis at 779-5465 or
me at 779-5136 with any scheduling input that you may have.
e
brdsched
Washington County does not discriminate on the basis ot race. color, national origin,
sex, religion, age and handicapped status in employment or the provision of services.
9-12 ST. LUCAS UNITED BUTCH, SCOTT, DENNY
7:30 pm)
5 PM TOWN HALL BECKY, SCOTT
7 pm)
9 AM CITY HALL FRANK, SCOTT
12 7 pm)
7 PM O.H. ANDERSON SCH BECKY, SCOTT
17 7 pm)
/S
WNSHINGTON COUNTY SCHEDULE
1990 LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
-DAY
HON/DATE -CITY/TO
TIME
LOCATION
1.MONDAY APRIL 2 WEST LA
(2nd-Tuesday
2.MONDAY APRIL 2 GREY C
(2nd-Monday
3.TUESDAY APRIL 3 MARINE
(2nd-Thursday
4.TUESDAY APRIL 3 PINE SP INGS
(* 2nd-Tuesday ~pril
5.WEDNESDAY APRIL 4 NEW SC DIA
(2nd-Tuesday pril
i
9-12 COM CENTER
17 7:30 pm)
6.WEDNESDAY APRIL 4 LAKE LAN 5 PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday A ril 17 7 pm)
7.THURSDAY APRIL 5 ST. PAU PARK 12:00 CITY HALL
(2nd-Monday pril 16 6:30 pm)
8.MONDAY APRIL 9 HUGO 9-12 CITY HALL
( 2nd-Monday pril 16 6 pm)
9.TUESDAY APRIL 10 STIL WATER TWP 5-6 PM TOWN HALL
(2nd-Thursday April 26 7 pm)
10.TUESDAY APRIL 10 WHIT BEAR LAKE 7 PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday April 24 7 pm)
,.,- - ...
* revised 1/26/90
COUNTY-BTAFF-REP-4t
ED, SCOTT,
FRANK, STEVE, DENNY
SCOTT, BARRY, BUTCH
DENNY, BUTCH, LEE
FRANK, ED, SCOTT a
DAVE, BECKY .
SCOTT, DENNY, BUTCH
BECKY , DAVE
DENNY, BECKY, SCOTT
11.WEDNESDAY APRIL 11 LAK ELMO 3-6 CITY HALL FRANK, SCOTT, BUTCH
(2nd-Tuesday May 1 6:30 pm) JEANETTE, BARRY
12.WEDNESDAY APRIL 11 LAN FALL 7 PM CITY HALL BARRY, SCOTT
(2nd-no date se )
13.THURSDAY APRIL 12 BAY ORT 10:00 AM CITY HALL BARRY, SCOTT, BECKY
(2nd-Tuesday May 1 6:30 pm)
l4.THURSDAY 5 PM TOWN HALL PAT, SCOTT,
7:30 pm) DENNY, ED
15.TUESDAY APRIL 17 OAK P K HEIGHTS 5-7 CITY HALL SCOTT, STEVE,
(2nd-Monday A ril 23 6:30 pm) BARRY, ED
16.TUESDAY * APRIL 17 LAKE o SHORES 6-8 AFTON-LAKE.SCH. BUTCH, DENNY,
(2nd-Thrusday ay 3 7:00 pm) JEANETTE e
17.THURSDAY * APRIL 19 ST. PT. 6:30 PM CITY HALL BUTCH, SCOTT,
(2nd-Tuesday 7:00 pm) JEANETTE
..... ' .....
e
la.MONDAY APRIL 23 DELLWOOD 5 PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday May a 5 pm)
19.TUESDAY APRIL 24 BIRCHWOOD 7PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday May a 7:30 pm)
.2. ; -'.
20.TUESDAY APRIL 24 STILLWATER CITY 3-7 CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday May 15 6:30pm)
I t{ ~
21.WEDNESDAY *APRIL 25 COTTAGE GROVE 3-7 CITY HALL
(2nd-Wednesday May 16 7:00 pm)
30.MONDAY MAY 7 LAKE ST. CROIX BCH. 6 PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Monday May 21 6:30 pm)
31.TUESDAY MAY a FOREST LAKE TWP. 3-7 TOWN HALL
(2nd-Monday May 21 7 pm)
32.WEDNESDAY MAY 9 WILLERNIE 6 PM CITY HALL
(2nd-Wednesday May 16 7:30 pm)
33.THURSDAY MAY 10 OAKDALE 5-9 CITY HALL
(2nd-Tuesday May 22 6:00 pm)
34. portion of Hastings (notified by Dakota County)
~ ** WEDNESDAY APRIL 4th 7:00 PM CITY HALL
FRANK, SCOTT
JEANETTE
BECKY, SCOTT
JEANETTE
JEANETTE, ED, BARRY
SCOTT, DENNY
ED, SCOTT, DAVE
STEVE, DENNY, BECKY
BUTCH, FRANK, BARRY
JEANETTE
BUTCH, SCOTT, PAT
BUTCH, SCOTT, STEVE
BUTCH, DAVE, SCOTT
BECKY, SCOTT, ED
ED, SCOTT, BUTCH
BECKY
BUTCH, SCOTT
JEANETTE, BARRY
SCOTT, DENNY
KEN TH., ED
BUTCH, SCOTT
KEN, SCOTT, ED
DENNY
BECKY, SCOTT
PAT, SCOTT
DENNY, ED
STEVE
\
,:',:::~: .~.>:-: <~~t .~<', <(~;::::\>: .it;.;. >;'~~'.:'11:'> :.: ~~:<'>:'1:' '.: .',' ~:~;~. :....' .~<<:::~;<. ::-d:~' 'f!:':', ';!t<.;..>:~.:<<;' j~;' 'i't>>:';r4I;":.A..:.
...".",..~..~<_;. -.:....,:..;j...'..I't..;~.tl.'\'. '" ,', ",' ',f ;-0"""""" ..,f.,..;:-f......~...",. ...-....,.., ."...,-.... . 1'~.I'~"
01 tIlI.&to W N-.... 'OI'''''"l,oI N'~~ "\Q'~I-..J ,-",~ .~' ~ ~! '0;1' \0 (;'t.::4' '.S::::;; ~ ~_ 6,'~' c>> ...."'.ur' ."".tlJII,_;""",j,l.'t'.lf"
~ ~J ~
)l~:J';
':'~"~'~ .
\
...tI
:lJ"T1
r
~c
:lJZ
...tI
-1111
1TI:lJ
1<
...0
Z-i
!TI
<(I)
O~
-i
!TI
(I)
... ...
-.J...J
UlUl
SS
ro..-
GS
......
~
::0
....
-i
ITI
I
....
Z
<
o
-i
ITI
(I)
e
e
",. C1l i'.> Oll ~ IJ'I
....., C1l 1J'I.$a W N-
(J1 1J'I11I IJ'I VIOl
U'I.&:o' ...
I :':: 0'1
'.J ."....J..... .=.......:' ;....;.;:....."...::.:4;~. -A...... ..'.....:: ..:....~. 4 =:l:. a'
, ~....,'." ":: : -'''.' I _V.:::::::..:.r" ":I" . . . \'-' ", u h"Y. . . ., ,.".::t::::J .... . .' ~ ......" " ~ .tJI{". ., ..~.'~, .1p"".:
'" '... . :'.:. .......~:::::.\(lrh.N(C\3lrJlkI~.:..:.........=x::....,'. ...c.;.:':...,'... ". ....~.
....~,
-:<.:-: JE..' J~'3'~
,',. .......~...
J..:>.\ .V;'
>3Y"
. .. .::::1J"' . <.'
,
-:D
e
e
;,' '..::.u;:~ ~,,~ ~N;~_ .',:.:. ::. ... ,~.I~,~ ~~.; ,~. .j:~",~_,~ ~,,:~~~ ~~. ,"'.:(>' _ ~~.~: t':':~"i _ : ~ ! <W. ~,~.~..~ W,~,~~..~.,~,~..N .~_. ~...; ~.~ .~."m..~ ~~.::~ ~.~..~.,~
~'t~':~:"W'~' ~,.\"" ~~.:.~'
'-'=,\(..,.... .\."l....J~..,., ~.= -k.. - .I!.I. .....\.1,..:. ....~.=~. ",:~~.'...'.4,.....',..~-=~......\,t. .....~. ',. .~,=~".,.,. &t,. U~..., ,~~<\=."
..', .~:.:' :t" '.',', ',.f ,";' .:;' ," ~"'I" '.:, ".: ,7:'.-~" ".' ','. ~~';';' ':':'.' \. ". ", ,;", _~J ',". ", ':~Y'g'IfNi Cl3.LNitjd.',: .-" .'....~: ",::' ".," '. ~. '~"'('''''\''''';_:'''''H'
' .'. ',. '.:;:r~" ,',', . ....'..",. .!',,",:'.' '.:.:_'~,.:,,' .'.1~\~-2...~'~~
\
"(" '~:~"".',':,,,,.', 't:t~'-,"~ ,,' ':.'~"':t" ..""\~.~. ;;',:.',.'.~;',~,'::\; -"'.: . ',""', ~. ;,~ . " . . "\....", ,-,': '.' , . ,'...ci.' .-',','.';' ._.../t-.,7...........~'.;
; .'E:4...~"_.'t.~'.. .-:':,".",,',-'," :fii;"1'~'
" .'~{' "",,(1.. '" ,(I, , ",(> ',=:-:n (\ , .., .C~, , , .r ,::. ,r ;'= r ,'.': :C>,,:,::. (','.'.'.' (' '~,f "" . . (h. ...,,( "..(' =..(' . ,', .'0 \,,"" 0 ':":"~..._r=I.(
\ t,:; :,<...~~---., ~. \; ..~' .~' : ~ ~ .: IO~' l~L "--J' '~ ~t ~'.~'.~ . '~:'" ~~. ~ '~:..;' ~~. "~, _~ ~' .... . ; . :~. <.' ,~. '.~. 'A~ . ~ . ~ ".' ~ ,t,;: ~ ~~ "~'~~,":i ~~ ~_!',~
_~~" .~~~ ~~. t<,,~ ~~'.:' :~' ~/ ,~/ ~~-., -.. ,~.~~..\
~....~
:;:~~"'<':">'
"-"'1" , . .
e
e
~ ~ ~
'\~:;>/ ;~; <:':~ <t~:~~~~,::;, ~ :::~.~~::: >\,:: ~::~ ~><:~r~\: ~:: ><,~~~~::::'::<~.; -:"/;:~' .~.t:.: :.: ~~;<::;~
.'. '~,",'
.~:~.
~~'~
STILLWATER PRECINCT 2 RERUN 2
WRSHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA - GENERAL
CONGRESSIONRL DISTRICT ..6...
PRECIe CODE :.~~.
ELECTION - NOVEMBER G,
LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT
REGISTERED VOTERS
1 ~.9~J:1
...',?l. ,.:;;>
e
PRGE
1
31 O',~.
3 >>!
3 ~ <>'.t
3G;f~ t,..... ·
~::;;.! K
~.'.,'.'.,.
V~r
:< '>j
.' . t
41 :< ':(',
"
5 >, <:!
'O-i
Kuaj'
:~:!
,". i
5.,;'; i :
'~,' ~,r;.."
;.- ";~ ~
:0::1
71'(6:'[
,
6::
I \
,'I
...,~.s:;:
is'
,I ( -;,;'
STILLWATER PRECINCT 2
RERUN 2
P_NCT CODE...... REGISTERED VOTERS
e
PAGE 7
~~A!
'\' ','
oJ '
,. ~ .. -,
, I
p. J--
POSITION
NUMBER
COMPUTER PAPER BALLOT PRECINCT
TOTALS TOTALS TOTALS
ACCUMULATED PERCENT OF
TOTALS ACCUMULATED
~ ~
Ii
~ ~
, ~
~;
i,
r i!
It ,.,
"'!
~~,:,,,--~,....-....
...._~_.._,
--~......_-
,-'-:
,c' l't:,~ 1"L ~,,', _ "L:<;--,,,,,, ~~ ","",oo
(~r', .', 'r-'-.,'y:'..., :r:~.c'"''''C''' .,y-r.'.. '0'~'ci:" .'0)........('.;..... "c;j-;(:'
{ ~ ~ ~~.. ~ .;'''' . ~.:- 1 J, ::~<~. ~I:".; ;".." j,' . "';. _}::;:%:5 . ,-- _;"'. ',l_ ,/" " ,'/ ~ t ~ '-.. "';''1;.., .',.... ':' _'/ ,~! ,',,', i_~.'~. ~',~~.~:"/. I .' ,,", .,~,/,'
/. t.:. ~.._~_ .::::t::1 , ;.:
" ~ O'l (11 '~ :! w ~. .
to
-i
>-;
r
r
~
:p
-;
rn
X-
C,
:;t
IT;
(')
'""'
:z
c
1',
;:r
IT
;:r
C.
:z
f't
1.
::t
n ("
-i0 C
03 I::
-i'O r
:DC
r-i
mf!1 .
:Xl
'0
D
"0
-irn
0:Xl f
-i
:Dtt\ L
rD .
mr l
r
0 r
-i f
'0 t
-i:lJ
01Tl
-in (
:D'"
rz r
mn {
-i
:D
n'O
nlTl
~-
rz
D-i
-i
1TI0
0"'11
J
j,
I
,~,'
';<;:;;;1/: :..:C:,,', ,.>:Ci~.C:':: ':..;. e.:
"_" ..,.,..' ,:' ...'.. "oo' ,Ys'rr~J.Nllld '"
€;.
i~:::~:::>,:-,::~:,~~'.~~~~:~:~ :~~::~:~::::~'<.~: ~~~~~::::: ::.~,:.:::~~;~: ~ :::~~'~~: :i:>i~~}:~).)~;;: :-:.'::~:;~~'::: :<,'~:>~ :~~:~.:' ':~ry'~o7 ~
e
,....:.::;.
Kl\
~'~,'
,...
~, ;:..:
12
1:_ ,."'-
e
~::'
--..::
1',1').; ::.;
f:
..I. :.' O:~
.: _ ~,o......;
',;....... ",:"ft;.
" 'i. . \,__,.
,.. ,..
... r-- ... l"I ~ U1.' III r-- a:l t1\ 0 ... N I'l '<t U1 \0
,".1;::':'-'I'~.' . " ..' \ ,. ,:.""J.>'''i,'':'~:'':. I..i'~ ("l , .,', '~ ,.~'_' :1O_'.'~:'_5'l'\~..,trl.,..._.. ..
~cEn. ...'<,,)'.....' ~.:.'.' g'~.j' . 'J.'.' "")' , ,,' >=, J' .,. ).. "':J' . ':,,)'= ~' ., ..J.... 'U'" .;.J~;.,)....'..,,J.. '. 'V' ',' '~ l''=
~~""'" ",,\ ",0<' , ,= ,,' " "','~ """'s.,' ',',",,',',',',, ,\" IE',,'''''''' ""', '~'''' ",',',':" : ',","'1!i!i"
\t
\
\
(,,' .S;..:' ',- ::rl~:1' ~ "f'" -,j;, :_(,:, ~>~~:"._.,..., ':~! th'~~',', '~.....- '.... )'. ~..' ~~.
~ J ,. r.. ,d .. "t ,m.. " ..'J,..'", ,~ . ..',', ',.:.........., ',.
1- '~'!-,. <' ;. 1 > \.~ .~ 'I 'I f ( , l' .' ~'t o~ I . i " . .'. ". " ' 'i. . . . . ' .. ~
'.~),.~
:~-v
~
r_
:=-:
~,
t-',:
e
,.<
"...,;
::J:'-
::1
e
~>
~
~...J~I'J~
>~~:,:':.,';::!? "
" .
,:g- 1< ',':-~'._;-,~,:,;:.:,': '.."t
'.':t:::::l:' ,
....:J;;.;:-:,\t ;<</" ,:~.t'" "')~::',:':<I ..
':" ,',',.,.. ',:':y;Sn:~.LNi~d' ,':',":'
"', :.,~: < ~ /: t.. .:~: t,,' ,Lt~ l~~':~ .~:~:<.<:~;~:
. . . t' < > . . , " ~ -+---' _ ;' . .
,'.::~
i:
\
I
'f>;':->:-:' >:-:':-.
',..,,' . , ,.
,.. I.
~. ,'. I. .,0,.', 1!", .".; ~. '.",.' ,.'.:.' ..\..i:i?i....' '..... '.- t: >~-.~.:..' f' . /".' ~7~>,: ~.'--'~i. ",:'.'!'. ',,' ~;';~i'~' / .. -'.... .....,' .
:~j.,,-~ \ ~..\""~~',.~.,"o'"'' '~.. 4:":"""~~','~~ :;1, .....'...!:;~.r,.\ t...\~ 1'''"t.I~:~:~~ ..'~. .' .'~ '.. '." : .. .f .' ,".', -.f
, .., "(J)l W 'Ul'-..
~.~.~. ~. 'W ~ ~
=
'="
.$'.
.. " =
:::' :->r-;';',;.:-r,:,:- >:,.:.;;;;.
"., yt' ~
:;::::::~::::':-!
" " f, I, ~ " . ,1
;:..
~
,-'
~
z
<,.....,
tS
S
,',
~
-e
~,
-'~
~
e
~
!:, ':3;e;:
" ::::E'i '
",:~,:.;::: :--:.:,:{ ;~~:~:::~.:;:: :>::\,J~~:l/,;~;: \~~':-6;~'~~:<"::'; I, ::'ii'.',::: ;::'~:~:?: ::~.~~:; :~)}~:~-~:~ :f;:~: :::~::,~~,~):,:>,>~\
I,~
. ~e,.,
-------=-- fiH,:"m',J1,t
<, rg
STILLWATER PRECINCT 4 RERUN 1
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTR - GENERAL
CONGRESSIONAL DISTlUCT . ./-:} . .
PREeT CODE . '.~ ,.:i~'
EL.ECT I ON - NOVEMB'E'R-6,
LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT
REGISTERED VOTERS /
199121
,)
e
PAGE
~,
~
. .'. .-../'~)
....,1...) .......
~.i':
. . ", ~ :'].
:;itj"
'n8~ :
. t;,:,
#
..
*
"*
::;::::-t ,. .m .
f""\'::,r'A.' , "rl,' ", "A""" "n t;:!;':'l:',::.,'" ,
lr :ao.~\'~.: j :.: .-.~,a:~:~>.~:.: .:. ::~_I~~~'~"~~:'"
. . \
',n':' '. <"',' " 'h~ .,:,.,:.,",;r..., ..','.:.A', '" ',;,,;a.A'.',..',;A'...',',;A'. ','. '.n...S.ri,','.'. ;~.';';"'A,' ,', ',17"l $'
, ,~,?,',\ \,~ .~~_.' /,-~ -~\~..':"\,:.;.,,'./;\,.'~~ ,..\:~'.;.:...',,~..:~ \j~:.:,,~~,-\.:~~.~"'_~,:. ..... ~~'\ ..-',,'.\.t.'. '..:::r.:t.."'. : ~ . r ..~_:' :':'~"~_' 1._,< ~~"o
'U'I' -,J!o' 'w' NO _ \0' 0;',::; 'a:"(~' '_;' W~~.. ':: . '.(......... .~.._.I.
m
-l
.....
r
r
r
D
-l
{Ti
;U
1:1
;U
ITI
n
.....
z
n
-i
~
;lJ
111
:0
C
Z
....
'D
Z c'
em u
3;-4 ::1.,
rr-l M
{TiH .
::00
Z
-I
n n
-i0 0
c:::;: tl
-i"O lTi
DC
r-i
mlTl
::0
"0
1)
~
w
-ilTi
0:lJ ID
-i
Dttt
rD .....
Ulr Ul
r -i
0 lTI
-i ::l:
lTi
"0 t::l
-i:O
om <-
-in 0
D...... -i
rz lTi
me; ;lJ
-i fJ)
-
oJ,;
n
-in
OC
-13
DC
rr
mD
-I
m
t:
D
n1:l
nm
c::o e
3G
err,
rz
D-\
-l
rrio
tl"ll
'C
L
G':
111
-...:
N ,N N N
. ::~'::::.:.~:: " ~,~~f.~, ~ ~:.~:::::/~:i:':::::: :~,~:~:::: :~~:,~~: :~<::,\~::: ;.~~~:~~>:::: :~:.:-:;':: >~:,<:: ~~,,~"~.~;::;::<~~~ :~?:,~~:' ':: :.~:'~:~.:'> :::}~,::: :',:~\
~
i
(f..,.. ',("'" .(',gg'(i'" ...'.{l',:.:..,.,(<....;,:f\:~.c'>'I...(V.,.."(il'..,..-'(1<,;5,'".;,...,'r-'.....'::f.:,....('L~~'.' ':(+:-'..;'.(l',..,."~'.~l)':.:,Ir1':;:(
,\7/.'.. " :,.,', ,.,:~,. .'::..,'~:;.,:..., ..,..,......=., :..j..~;~~::k-::..~"~..,... ,=' .., :"'~"'~' ':~:~~:l-:::' ~:"~:'~:~~:;:~:; /~.~:..~.'::~:~\ '~'<'. ,::,: ,.
lJl
...;
H
r
r
~
:D
-i
m
:::0
'0
:::0
(11
(1
....
2
(1
-:
.,.
:::0
(11
:::0
~
...
lJ
20
ClJl U
3: H :::0
tt1 -I .
ITI....
:::00
Z
-:
il G
-10 0
03 t
-i'O IT:
DC
r -i
mm
:::0
'0
:n
-im
0:::0 :::0
-i rn
Dttl G)
r D ,,",
(flr (f:
r -'
0 rri
-i :::0
IT'
'0 t::
-I::::
0111 <
-in c
D- ....
rz fT1
mil :::0
-i tf,
D
n
-in
oe
-13
DC
rr
mD
...;
ITI
o
D
0'0
gge
30
ern
rz
D-I
-i
mo
0'1
:D
G'.:
rr.
u
::; '~.''(). ~..~.,~.~"_c:,~..~'.:.~., '.',.":" ~.\~+.'\O '. /1' I -"~.'-'~':';' .,;1 l.~\'_ ,~. .",.. p" -;.,:::.~.~'.,. ",", .'.:' ',.!:t't;.:1.,' ';"'l'': ~ 'i~..-..,...- ;f;.....:.'.
'~';"';;:::"," ",-.,,-.,,- ':-~."'.."." '. ~~;,:....,."
,,l,= ~ "...~'. ". J~"".. ,,~, :;;::c::~.',:, ...'(,,'.,;,:,~,l,';': ~"~~~'''' '.',' ~h':':':,,~.' . . ..(.",=-,.... ',' . , ,\1.:,:" ,.\.- " .. "f,.o,=~, . ,.' "-.>".....~. '" ,.,c.
. . =.:.:. . . '.' '.' .,......:.'. ~." ."'. ":'1 ";r=" /.. .,n.."""': .'c" . .=.: ....: .:: .:. :::: '. ..:..:",.. .:: .. ..:'..:: . .. ..
I
.~.
~,~'.
,~
, 'A 3' .,1li../,', ,';~';" :..;; ',', ','";,,';::;;5:,'....'.'..:','""...,';,,....,.. .~,~ ~'... .',' ,i,,:.;,'.. ;.,:,.'..,.'" '.5' .:..;','. .' ,r','.'::',,'.':.';'.':.. ~,g". ........',"
''',',',: '--;'..'.. ',!i'S:T~,.,
(J.=',\!, ;',',':','}', ',':::?"',:: ,:,It',= !4~, , .. ,t', .,'.' (( ....:. {r(,'~,~ ::::,<;~..,:;:.'~(::::W:':.=y::,'""y:,:~;',:.,,\1f ; ,,'((:=-I,e,. ,..f?, ,'"j ,r;., .', tLY==}'(
~.~ ...... ' m 'lPI"A .~ ..~ .~ '0' ~'~(D"~ 0'1 t1l""" w' IV -~ ",' '....[ ,'~.' '~'-;"""'\.)'!\):'" 1D CD. ~ C7I (It ,z,.' l.&t "N' ._." lO;- :;,.~ ~i;;..~ ~\" 'J:;~ .~.- "D' 0" <J
en' 'WI".. 'w N '.... t.~._~.\~\-~~:,
. .'.'
,~;::,:,~,
"
_ 0
"~~~~ L,:,~;
:;:00
D~
rnl'-i
::cr
.....r
zz
GJD
-;-;
nOfl1
02::0
z
GlO'tl
:UO::tl
mCfT1
Ulzn
ill -.j ~
.....-<z
o~ n
Z -i
D3
r..... l~
Z
ClZ
.....m
IDUJ'tl
-i 0;;0
;:O-lfl1
HDn
n l-<
...;!Z
[j'J~
'-'i ~G
!~.' mo
;:oCl
:.om
r
~
r H;'
rn lfj"'-
~.
D rr:
....,m
I-< .....
<zoo
mO-1
<rn
Clrn:lJ
....:;lT1
Wtr!t:l
-irn
::tl:u<
.... 0
n(l'!...;
-i~ ITI
;:0
.....00
\~ ;:g
'...\ &'\l
i. C'-
G'
e
""
D
GJ
rn
J'\,) ~ i to 0'1 en .... - 0; ::j 0; (; ;, w ;:; : 0 It) m -.J 0'1 Ul _'" W N -
'.'''.~:': '.',\":~<,",,,:::'>,~":<':-:.C1,...:: -:~.;;';,t..':,,' >.v:': ':;,~ :-:', .. ~:~,\,..:, ::~~;;;..:,~ ..:,..,.......~;\c:....'.',',
~. \~' '.'.;,.,~.~...,..,..,.,." 1',' ',' .':''V''~n:~Ji.n~d: . ',' ".' ." ','," .~..,;.. ',';",' l,.~~.f ,.'..ll...."'.:.. '~_, .,.
~<::':'~
~Ii!ffin:
o~
STILLWAfER PRECINCT :5
PRECINCl CODE .....ei::.Gltilt::.lil::.lJ VUTl:::liti
POSITION COMPUTER PAPER BRLLOT PRECINCT
NUMBER TOTALS TOTALS TOTALS
ACCUNULATED
TOTALS
e
PERCENT OF
ACCUMULATED
l..i,;lJ..:.
pS
:~; ~.~
/<:g
)',;!! :
~-"!I
S'
,en
:-:;~
, ,
.)::
'- ~~.
~,/::-~~'"
>"::<':.:1'
-..:r
.:':.:: -:': :;t,1 ~:~.~,~:: :.:: ~.: :,,~:<: .)> 1- , t: ':' ..'>~-'
g 'VI "i: .~ "N '_ :~. \0 VI "1:;' W ~ :!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,I
4-. ' , j~~~",,',:,
"
"',
;:::-\~i
~
=
':~
, """", :::t.~""" ",.'",
~ \".' .<'f~~:;',:~~' :r. >:. ::\~~:;.. ,.:~~ r I'.: .\~;r:~?:,<~: ~:t
'....
'\0 '0:1 'f" .
;:)
zc
em
~ ~H;.,
111
:lJ
Z
II
-lO
03
-i;:)
:DC
r-'
(/Jfl1
::u
;:)
:D
;:)
-iJTl
o;n
-i
:Dttl
rD
(/Jr
r
o
-i
;:)
-i::lJ
err.
-' ,~
-, "
D....
rz
mn
-l
"'"'
n
-ill
OC
-i3
DC
rr
mD
-i
ITI
t:l
D
n;:)
~.
rz
D-i
-l
mo
t;jT,
. ~~..'~: .,:<'.,\:'~;l~<.<,,>, :~.'.\...< ~~:\
,,' ,::;::;.:x:":',::::'..Vs'/)'t<i03'iN,ad,' ~.
I . ... " .;...' '.',~" I . .'.' :t..:iIS.' .:,.'.;';:1(.':_:.:\...... "::::::,"_~:'~
i,\,-'~::-t::~< /.',/l~ j ".::g;~<<l ., J . ~,