HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-03 CC Packet
,.~ . ;'.
AGENDA
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
Apri 1 3, 1990
e
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4~30 P.M. AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
1. Flnance Director 4. Comm. Dev. Director 7. Fire Chief
2. Publ ic Safety 5. Parks & Recreation 8. City Attorney
3. Public Works Dir. 6. Consulting Engineer 9. City C 1 e rk
10. City Coordinator
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
e
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meeting - March 13, 1990.
INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS
1. Richard Rainer, North Hill Video - Concern regarding customer access to
Laurel & Owens St. parking lot.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider the request of
Dennis C. Smith (dba Micky's Cafe & Creamery) for an On-Sale Wine and
Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for a restaurant located at 324 So.
Main St. in the Grand Garage Building.
Notice of the Hearing was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990.
2. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Variance
request to the sideyard setback requirements (ten feet required, five feet
requested) for the conversion of a garage into living space at 406 South
Hemlock Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Virgil .
Crowder, Applicant, Case No. V/90-9.
"' Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were mailed to affected property owners.
e
4.
This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Design
Permit and Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the placement of a
forty-five sq.ft. banner sign on the Old Post Office Bldg., 220 E. Myrtle
St. in the CBD, Central Business District. Tom Schweitz, Applicant, Case
No. DP/V/90-10.
Notice of the hearing was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were mailed to affected property owners.
This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a a Special
Use Permit to conduct an over-the-phone service business at 1405 So. Sixth
St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Jeffrey H. Skinner,
Applicant, Case No. SUP/90-12.
3.
1
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
5. This is the day and t me for the Public Hearing to consider a Variance to
the front and rear se back requirements (17 ft. front yard and 7 ft.
rearyard setbacks req ested, 20 ft. front yard and 25 ft. rearyard
required) for the con truction of a home at 322 West Hickory St. in the
RB, Two Family Reside tial District. Greg Holmquist, Applicant, Case No.
V /90-13. .
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
6. This is the day and t me for the Public Hearing on the Variance request to
the Parking Ordinance for a 6,482 sq. ft. office building at 201 No. 2nd
St. in the CBD, Centr 1 Business District. George Spevack, Opus Corp. for
West Publishing Co., pplicant, Case No. V/90-14.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
7. This is the day and t me for the Public Hearing on the Variance to the
Parking Ordinance for expansion of a restaurant/takeout business at 826
So. 4th St. in the CA General Comm. Dist. Donald Istel, Applicant, Case
No. V/90-15
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
8. This is the day and t me for the Public Hearing on the Variance to the
Subdivision Ordinance (access to a public street) for the placement of a
driveway over public roperty, an unimproved road, at Hazel and Third
Streets in the RA, Si gle Family Residential District. Don Baker, Steve
Erban, and Joe Gould, Applicants, Case No. V/90-16.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
9. This is the day and t me for the Public Hearing on the PUD Amendment for
parking lot location or the Washington County Gov't. Center office
expansion at 14900 No 61st St. in the RA, Single Family Residential
District. Washington ounty, Applicant. Case No. PUD/88-71.
Notice of the he ring was published in The Courier on March 22, 1990
and copies were maile to affected property owners.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Final Plat Approval - Orleans Terrace, Phase I, Heritage Development Co.,
Applicant. Case No. UD/89-83, SUB/89-82.
2. Final Plat Approval - for subdivision of a 14.963 acre parcel (Outlot B,
Parcel C of the Still ater Industrial Park), Prime Site, Inc. Applicant.
Case No. SUB/89-69.
3. One-Year Review
SUP/89-31.
esota Transportation Museum Ticket Booth, Case No.
'*'< , ~'"""
--
e
4. Possible second readi g of an Ordinance amending the Stillwater City
Charter regarding pub ication of Can~aign Financial Reports.
5. Possible second readi g of an amendment to Chapter 29.01, Amending Sewer e
Service Rates.
6. Possible adoption of esolution declaring City's intent to participate in
the construction of a new Natlonal Guard Armory/Community Facility.
2
.. . ~ --
e
e
e
NEW BUSINESS
1. Permit Application for Dock Facilities (St. Croix Boat & Packet Co.)
2. Possible adoption of Resolution proclaiming "Minnesota Earth Day 1990" in
the City of Stillwater.
3. Historic Significance of Stillwater Jr. High School.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS (continued)
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Resolution Directing Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8264).
2. Applications (list to be supplied at meeting)
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/FYI
QUESTIONS/COMMENTS FROM NEWS MEDIA
ADJOURNMENT
3
/
/
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
~DEPARTMENT ____!2~~~_R~~~~~~rrt_________ MEETING DATE _~rLL]~_~J]___
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
_R~9.~~~_f.Q..~~iLjl"p.QrQ.'Lq.L1Q._q"t.tf1JiUn..a.D2.9~I!!.W.~LQIl<1J..e~Q~c;.hi.Q_cnn.fer.en.ce_an....JJJ.!1e.Ji~ 1990
in St. Paul
e
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline
associated with this request and
needed to fund the request)
the cC1sts, if any, that al"e
the proposed source of the funds
~~~~!~~~~~_~~_~~~~I~rr~~j~_j~~_________________________---------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
YES
NO _~_
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS ~~~I BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A
MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL tr'EETING!~N O~DE.R TO PfE ~~CED IN THE COUNCIL MAT~.RIAL PACKET.
SUBMITTED BY ~~l~-_Qdj~~------- DATE --~fJQfJ-Q-----
tit
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
jJ~
FR: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DA: March 30, 1990
RE: COMPUTER PURCHASE
We have an opportunity to purchase a computer, printer and two software packages
(at state prices) with the Minnesota Department of Transportation reimbursing
to the City 60 percent (60%) of the cost. The reason that MnDOt is reimbursing
cities for the purchase, is their desire to have on-line computer capability with
cities for information reporting requirements for state Aid. I have checked with
SEH and they are prepared to comply with the computerized requirements for state
Aid. (They are consultants for other cities and are aware of all the
requirements and will have their own computers available to process the
information, as required).
Therefore, the Ci ty could purchase the package , receive 60 percent (60%)
reimbursement from MnDOT and have the computer for our needs. There are two
computers needed and budgeted for 1990 for Administration/Finance.
The total package being offered is at the state pricing cost of $7,828. With
reimbursement at 60 percent (60%), the net cost to the City would be $3,131.20.
This is an exceptional opportunity for the City and I would recommend the
purchase.
e
e
e
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council /JfJ
FR: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DA: March 30, 1990
RE: FIRE CONTRACTS
The fire contracts are due to expire on April 30, 1990. Attached as Exhibit A
is a cost allocation with 1990 - 1991 proposed contract amounts for each of the
townships. Exhibit B is a detailed five-year averaging schedule for each
township that was used in the calculation of the contract amounts.
The 1990 - 1991 contract amounts are as follows:
Grant Township
May Township
Stillwater Township
$64,422
$35,477
$54,702
Grant and Stillwater Townships are a slight decline in amount from 1989 and May
Township has increased (primarily due to increased number of fire runs). The
overall increase for 1990 is 2 percent (2%) over 1989.
Staff recommends approval of the 1990 - 1991 fire contract amounts.
C'-~ : [,IL ~ ern l:'LL~_i JUiiLEi;IL~- ;iT".'>.. i ~. '- ~:"-' -~'" - ~ L' 2..f ---"- .'-;;--;;or---
,J. ~ ; ~ ~ f i :5 ~ I S:5 ~ I"
~ ~ b~ -"*~ ~e* -
~ ~ !: ::::! ~ :::: ~ ~. ~. ~ i ~ ~! ~ :::: ~ i ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~(~ ~~~. ~ ~~~. I
!......-I ......-4&...... rs or+u;::r * ......-tt;'"t*...... * :0 I
'=' lit 0 :IE 0 :E Ill.... * ::E S Ii:g *
-m ~~ 0' ~~i'I1O~ ::::g~::: d~; .-rm::: I I
I ~~ ~ [!I~i ~!i ~!! rii ~ '
~ ' i' ~ 0 .... I ~:5 0 I U) i :D I
....:< ~ ~. I ::::: tJ1 * ~ * r-
g ~ ~ b::: ~ 1 i ~
,j... ~ ~ ,..,::: ~ *:D I'
i5 i::. ::: ::: ::l
re ~ i I i ~ j
lJl ~::: I::: I
~ ~. * I *
c::: g::: i :::
:. ~1,:5 J $
'? * I *
.,:, I' ::: :::
c::: * *
ri i ::: :::
iif i, I'::: :::
lC . 1*::: :::
.:. :1 I I I = ;
-; ~ ,! <*> Of> ~ tt. <*> .,. k I L <*> ~ i .... i ~
~ ~;I t:I ~ ~ ~ f!l ~ PJ .... , r~' ~ ~ * $ * ~
~,. 1.0 J ~ ~ 5R ~ ~ ~ .P- N I r..:. 0.- Cr. ::: ::: i'Ii
t ~ ,I .... ru ~ w ~ ~ m ~ I ~I' ::g ~ :5 i
I" 'I I ii' i i
I<*>' <*>........ ~ tt. <*><*> t; 'I! <*> ~ * * ~
ti~~~~ s ~~~~ ~"~:::i :::~
i _ 1_"'_ ..:....a ---.... 4'......:-...:&1 =r-
I g;: II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ::: :::
i r'u;1 ru ""-l W IU""-l ru r I r ru tJ1 f :::
I I i I
I ! I
I I I
i I
i I
I I
I I
I I
I ..... ,., a I
il~ I
~~~ i
~~~ I
,110:< I
~g.LQ !
III ....
, \11 :::r
III III III
~ 3. ~
,., .-r
III ~
l10
-s ....
III ....
l1o_ ~ ::no
\11 C1.
~ 1~.
l:r. ~ <
:;.< .-r :!.
III ....
C1. g .~
.
e
*
*
I *
*
*
*
.... .... r;; *
.... p::o ~ *
. '"
~ .... --..J ~ ...
ru ~ tJ1 ...
"Jl!. "Jl!. ~ ...
i ...
...
I ...
...
...
...
.... .... f ...
- :'-I ~ ...
...
.P- ru ~ ~ *
""-l ~ *
"Jl!. "Jl!. ~ ...
! I ...
...
I ...
...
i ...
...
~ ~ '-,J ...
P" ~ ...
...
.P- l.1\ ~ ~ ...
.... ~ ru ...
~ r"- ...
...
i ...
...
i ...
I ...
*
~ .... --..J ...
P" .... r' ...
...
.. .... .... ru ...
r.1\ ~ 0'> 1.0 ...
.... .... r- ...
i
I
I
e
...,
-
f:R
i
~~
~5
FliTl
'=' '='
U)
-.'\
,
i
I
l...
jt
'1::
'"'
..
I~
1~
~
r
~
i
,C"
j-
!~
j
1
1
l
1
I
/--'-~'i990J'9&~PROTEcnONCONTRACTS'-"""'" "~"~C~_-~'="""'~'~"n'-"~""_'_~"'M '"~'-',"'''M'''e '
1"-~:1 ,.I
L,U!
C-}t ~ EXHIBIT B - FIVE YEAR AVERAGES 5 YEAR _ ::-
'-~- -------------------------:..,.-----.,--" ---.----,-----c -----c-----.----,---" -----.c----AVERAGE----198':l._,..-:---198a-~--_1_981,..-___:_:_,..-19~-~-- -c-1985--. ---------------------.-------
-------------.--- .---------- ---.
(' I **************.***************f***************************f****.***************************************************f************
I ;' i SCHEDULE A. FIRE RUNS
l!~ lSti llwaterCity----,
" I
I .! Grarlt TOl'irlship
i 5 J
i May TCtwnship
_6_ L____Sti llwatel^.J ownshi 13.__._..,..-- ._________
71
I
I: I
L-, -..---~.---'.... -------- -- .
I 'e(
I:l:~:l:l~;.: ~~~~~-~~S)-- _~~-Nf~--E:EL~:;~~-_$B5,806.~:1:1"'ti:~J2. '::,:: '/y~7..'::5<- ___ . .__... _ _._.
! .'1 Grant Township * 15.24% N/A $2,236 $2,7'lB $20,'lB'l $18,641 $17,504 $18,877 15.33" 15.32"
I:]i May TOWTlShi P 7.26'/.. N/A $1,137 $1,235 $9,174 $B,9S0 $8,738 $8,967 7.28" 6.88"
I ':..J-----Stilll'later--TowrlShip ...11.47""' N/A-~-----$1699-"---$1,9B4----$14,682---$14 629 $13804 $14 372 11.67'/... 11.06"
1101 ------------------------ ' " ,
1 '7t I
IHI('f"' TCltal _~~~00~____~~ $15,039 $17,944 $123,125 100.00,c 100.00,c
<, 1::r~l:l~s~:T;u-pmwTl"'-- ..-- -:.:: - ~:-:2S2~-~~ 485 ----:3,256--,~,-,: 12, 970 ..... -- -- .... ----
"I~~! ..' Grant-Township-: "* - ~ - ..-,12.68~ -2,380-'----2,62J--"-------2,466--------2,335-'-- -2,254 w....._ 2,218
., !~:~I May TCtl'll'Iship H 6.50',< 1,220 1,459 1,215 1,167 1,138 1,120
Ii i~41_________:~_~w_a:_e~_~C<wrl~~~~_____..______.__,-____~__ 10.41" 1,954 2124 2,015 1,958 1,872 1,800 ______________________________n_____
:~I Total
------'''-:.:+-
;/21.__ --SCHEDULE-D. -ESTIMATED HOUSEHOlDS-
,~Ql Stillwater
l:~! Grant TOlmship
i: 1----- ------.May. T owrlship-_m ---,.-.--..__
1--"1' Stillwater TOWrlShip
32
~_.1 ~ ~ __ -.-----.:rotal-------~- ___ ___ _ _ . _ _
.'1'11
b.!
I:;;
L;-~-i
L~81
~~I--.--~_-_ __~___'_~~___--"c_._c_~..:__"',"___,,___"._~_m__".._. ,_"---"_-'-_"_c....-'...:...~
,tf, ~ II
i I
j/! '.:,1
,
e
68.30" .. 181. 40 ..185 -- - ___u. 275---'-"----'-195- _ -123
11.75" 31.20 30 47 43 18
8.13" 21.60 38 29 23 7
. ------------11~ 82"--_,___--31. 40----__-19------_--_49--_.---_-----47-. ~----_1~-------
--129
18
11
-- 27----
100.00"
-~-,..~-.~-.-.,.~......,.-----...__._-~.--~ .
------------------------
.-- M_ -.-,---.,..--..-.."'---.-~--.~..__.._-"_;_c--~......,..~-_-..-:-._.~-"C'"'-:-.---.-c-,.-...,'...,.,..--.,--~-~-~.-_~~-.~,~..__,._ __.,
*
_..ff__
73.29" 4,606 4775 4,711 4,605 4,497
11.16" 701 775 746 690 659
.------6.10,c----.-_...Jal-,..,..-c_-473c_c_-----385,..,.c---,-.J65-.."'-~_._~-352-__ -- .
9.45"594 655 625 598 '562
4,442
637
"",-- '",'. ,,-- ..",.. , ,,-
........,.'.'.._'_.,.'-'.--.--- "'-', -'-' ,..",,- " -,-,-,'-"" ,.
. "..... --- -... ---..-, -. ... -. -',"'" - ,,,- . ',',",... ,',',""
, , -, ,.'>-'"'---. ",'-',',,:,,',-,"',-,-, --,-'".'",,'-'.'-"'-"-","". '--'--','-'-'" -, -, - ,",' ,-'-'--""-',,- -', -.,.,
-~._.-100.00"...~ -6,a84~:""'~" . -.------..-_____.__~__________________________n
* 67,c OF ACTUAL
n60,c-OEACTlJAL
"-:.:. '---:.,"'-.- -'. '.
.' "'/ -,: :-,::,: :<:' :_:" - ':-< -,' '.:: -'::,;>:-: :,< ',: -" ,-'
- --------...:........-"'-.----'-'--'--- _.___A__________,...____~-.. _........_,_.__,.__,.~_-'-- _ ..._.__~., ___"'__..............._...._.~~ ~"_............._.~~" "....~~~. _ ,__,~."
...__,.__. u ___
e
e
//
e
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTMENT _~~~~~S~~~~~~!E~~tme~!________ MEETING DATE _~~2~_~~~~~~__
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
__~_~~s_~~~_s~~!:_~iJ~~_~~~!I.!.!:~~~~~!._G.9.!!~~~_.!~~~~.9_~~_C2!!~~_.Q!:!..v~_~~<!.2.!!~J 1 )
on Orleans Street
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------~---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------~------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline
ass,:,ciated w~th this request and
needed to fund the request)
the costs, if any, that are
the proposed source of the funds
_~~~~_~j_E~~~_~~~~~~_~~~i2ty_~_~Ee:~~1~~~Jl_11~___________~___________
------------------------------~--------------------------------------
----------------------------~----------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
x
YES
NO
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS ~~~I BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A .
::~::~E:~::r~~vi W~R\ TO ~;;~~~~~~;:~~~:::~:~~~~~~;;;;~~<:~4"~
--------------~~--------- ---------------
.:..:.~.,..>...,
e
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 3, 1990
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT WITH STATE FOR ASSISTANCE TO CONSTRUCT
BOAT ACCESS RAMP AT LILY LAKE.
~
The City applied for and received a grant from MnDNR to
improve the boat launch ramp at Lily Lake. In order to
complete the request and receive the State fund, the City
must enter into the agreement with the State regarding
construction and operation of the facility. The City
Attorney has received the Agreement and recommended the
changes as marked.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize execution of the Agreement.
e
c.c Dick Blekum, Parks and Recreation Director
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
_..-.~- ,-, -_......~.- ..,_ "'~".-:--.~'~_.'--""""'~.___"",_"'O""""'.~';"''"''''''''''~r''',,'.~_
e
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER
AND. THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
FOR RAMP AT LILY LAKE
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the State of Minnesota, acting by and
througn the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, hereinafter
referred to as the "State" and the City of Stillwater, hereinafter referred to
as" City" .
WHEREAS, the Co~nissioner of Natural Resources has the authority, duty
and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes, Section 97A.141, Subdivision 1 to
provide the public with free state water access sites on lakes and rivers
where access is inadequate; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Commissioner have determined that the
existing public water access site hereinafter referre to as "Access" on Lake
~ Lily legally described to wit:
9033-3000
Section 33, Township 031, Range 20, Part Southwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4
being all part lying West of West line of Greeley Street except the South
307.28 feet - subject to 8 feet wide cable utility easement.
Original Town. First Ward.
is inadequate and "high priority" for improvement under the Public Water
Access Program; and
WHEREAS, the City is fee owner of the Access; and
WHEREAS, the City desires that the State of Minnesota make funds
available through the Small Lake Management Program for; improvements-to the
access to enable the public to use it.
, '... :-: ~ 'l~:: n
e
NOW THEREFORE, in the consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived
~ by the public bodies hereto and for the benefit of the general public, the
parties agree as follows:
I. IMPROVEMENT AND COST
1. The City shall fund the construction of a parking lot and a
concrete boat launching ramp on the Access pursuant to the specifications of
the State. The State will reimburse ttle City for all or part of the City.s
cost within a reasonable tin~ after tne City submits verified proof of
authorized expenditures and the cost thereof incurred and paid, provided the
City has substantially contracted for and provided for a timely completion of
the improvement and development of the Access.
2. The State shall have the right to review and approve the Access
plans.
e
3. The State shall have the right, but shall not be obligated to
make additional improvements on the Access as needed to provide access to the
lake.
4. The State shall provide signs informing the public that the
Access is cooperatively provided by the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources and the City.
5. The State shall provide signs necessary for the operation of the
access, such as Boaters Rules.
II. OPERATION OF THE ACCESS
1.
access shall
of 5:00 A.M.
The City shall maintain the Access for use by the public. The
remain open for a minimum of 16 hours per day between the hours
and midnight. .. ...... ,~. i'!U i'1!)'"
e
2. The State shall have the right to suggest to tne City changes in
~ the land access improvements, structures, buildings, or signs, that are made
or erected on the Access.
3. The City shall not unreasonably restrict public use of the
Access.
III. LIABILITY
Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and
the results there of to the extent authorized by the law and shall not be
responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The
State1s liability shall be governed by the provisions of the Minnesota Tort
Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 3.736, and other applicable law.
IV. TERM
The Agreement shall commence on the date it is encumbered by the
~. Commissioner of Finance and be perpetual, except as amended by the parties.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
CITY OF STILLWATER
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
By:
Date:
~ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION
e By:
Special Assistant A~torney General
Date:
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE - ENCUMBERED
By:
Titl e:
Da te:
LIL YAGR. DOC.
~
~
· . O~.M-fM-- /~.
..~ STATE OF ~ If . L - I. 7>"&~,.';;::::'
.' ~~~~@'IT~ "'\ 1 ~ ~ ~e--
e, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES If){<- f..v.-
PHONE NO.
Trails and Waterways, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106
296-3572 FILE NO.
March 20, 1990
~f,
)'-~
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Direc~or
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(~
Dear Steve:
I have attached a copy of the proposed cooperative agreement between the
City of Stillwater and the Department of Natural Resources. Please
review the agreement. If it is acceptable please sign and return five
copies. Ii you feel changes need to be made, please send comments to my
attention.
e
As soon as we finalize the agreement, the money can be encumbered.
the money is 'encumbered, the project funds are guaranteed
construction can begin.
Once
and
If you have any questions please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Enclosures
~~.
l5 ~ .. ,I. ~...t...."
...~.~~.~
0' ~A.~.IA'~
rvjV~~'_
~'1c ~
^ -It ~ l-/\I\.~
JftI'il< U
7/ 'J. /10
Larry M. Killien
Area Trails and Waterways Supervisor
LMK/jl
cc: Del Barber
John Steward
Bruce Gilbertson
File
~
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
,/III
e
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the State of Minnesota,
acting by and through the Commissioner of the Department of
Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "State"
and ~~~ City of S~~llwater, hereinafter referred to as
"City".
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Natural Resources has the
authority, duty and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 97A.141, Subdivision 1 to provide the public with
free state water access sites on lakes and rivers where
access is inadequate; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Commissioner have determined
that.t.tie existing public water access site hereinafter
referred to as "Access" on Lake Lily legally described to
wit:
9033-3000
Section 33, Township 031, Range 20, Part Southwest 1/4
of Northwest 1/4 being all part lying West of West line
of Greeley Street except the South 307.28 feet -
subject to 8 feet wide cable utility easement.
Original Town. First Ward.
is inadequate and "high priority" for improvement under the
Public .Water Access~Program; and
WHEREAS, the City is fee owner of the Access; and
WHEREAS, the City desires that the State of Minnesota
make funds avilable through the Small Lake Management
Program for improvements to the access to enable the public
to use it.
NOW, THEREFORE,
in the consideration of the mutual
benefits to be derived by the public bodies hereto and for
the benefit of the general public,
the parties agree as
follows:
I. IMPROVEMENT AND COST
c.- ''7':
1. The ~e shall fund the construction of a
parking lot and a concrete boat launching ramp on the Access
"'-1-I:t5' . $7// r C'
the State. ~or ~
;.J ,l.~ ""-'f'I' .,,,- .- ,~,."". / ,r.~:'
J"}.,t.,'-, .;..:}/C,. r/1l'~t. eP~ .df$; ,-Ii} ;. ....~,
a reasonable time after
pursuant to the specifications of
lkIl to /,,' 1.1 ElM l!.t !.Ins$. -rIle ell-/, P o,.t,.
p.art.ia-:l. PQ~~t lJ:t.i--J:-be-rrt&B<e> wi thin
e
~
1t
the City submits verified proof of authorized expenditures
and the cost thereof incurred and paid, provided the City
has substantially contracted for and provided for a timely
.
completion of the improvement and development of the Access.
2. The State shall have the right to review and
approve the Access plans.
3. The State shall have the right, but shall not
be obligated to make additional improvements on the Access
as needed to provide access to the lake.
4. The State shall provide signs informing the
public that the Access is cooperatively provided by the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the City.
5. The State shall provide signs necessary for
the operation of the access,
such as Boaters Rules..e-ne.
Ar;:;;oeC>L> Hulce.
II. OPERATION OF THE ACCESS
1. The City shall maintain the Access for use by
the public.
The access shall remain open for a minimum of
16 hours per day between the hours of 5:00 A.M. and
midnight.
S (JJJE-~ 7()
GOll t...u1.
-n:;
The State shall have the right o~
It,.. t.c.r;:;$
o:VOY" + ~U;? Aeeese- r'aD~ changes in the land'l1 improvements,
71-111 r 11 fJ./E..
structures, buildings or signs, sha~ ~ made or erected on
rfltE (./'I'-y
2.
the Access.. wMhr..ut tvP,.v..p.ns4?~~~.
_ THi!;c, c./7"~ NOr l.Jr.lft,.pl1(ONf)f~ttr
<.:I. J:l,Q 03. t.~ n;i..t,.er shallvt ov.eJ;'see."..gR-.rtD"the,~,
restrict public use of
the Access a 110- c!l~!t-mc-.lf':h>~~e
.
ex.nreSI;L 'IT i,;t: ;10 ""~,Q.o-.nseIlJ;._.Q~b~
III. LIABILITY
Each party agrees that it will be responsible for
its own acts and the results thereof to the
extent
authorized by the law and shall not be responsible for the
acts of the other party and the results thereof. The
State's liability shall be governed by the provisions of the
Minnesota Tort Claims Act,
Minnesota Statutes,
Section
3.736, and other applicable law.
",~~;,~~~~~~~~':~JiX~~~~I}~~"?~~~~~:'J1-~I~'",,"II'li"'4~11!.l):"Il!":';',~.:::~J\''''',~c_""""""",-,"o""""""",,,~ .'~"~" "!~,.,."""_.,....""'.....
IV. TERM
The Agreement shall commence on the date ~t is
e
encumbered by the Commissioner of Finance and be perpetual,
except as amended by the parties.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
CITY OF STILLWATER
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION
By:
Special Assistant Attorney General
. Date:
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE - ENCUMBERED
By:
Title:
,
i
I' ~(I.;i<i,
IYW':)\~':
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
i
!
Date:
LILYAGR.DOC
-
,
_M~tIJ!!~I"~~"lJ~~JI,~:r"""''''''')ll'-,:'.Frr;:~:;::r:,?,:~-~",:,'",l'~'''''.''''~:'''1.'""'''
.
to..
"
e
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made between the State of Minnesota,
acting by and through the Commissioner of the Department of
Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "State"
andt.h.,e, City of St~,llwater, hereinafter referred to as
"City".
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Natural Resources has the
authority, duty and responsibility under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 97A.141, Subdivision 1 to provide the public with
free state water access sites on lakes and rivers where
access is inadequate; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Commissioner have determined
that.. .the existing public water access site hereinafter
referred to as "Access" on Lake Lily legally described to
wit:
9033-3000
Section 33, Township 031, Range 20, Part Southwest
of Northwest 1/4 being all part lying West of West
of Greeley Street except the South 307.28 feet -
subject to 8 feet wide cable utility easement.
Original Town. First Ward.
1/4
line
is inadequate and "high priority" for improvement under
the
Public ,Water Access-Program; and
WHEREAS, the City is :fee owner of the Access; and
WHEREAS, the City desires that the State of Minnesota
make :funds avilable through the Small Lake Management
Program for improvements to the access to enable the public
to use it.
NOW, THEf\EFORE,
in the consideration o:f the mutual
benefits to be derived by the public bodies hereto and :for
the benefit o:f the general public,
the parties agree as
:follows:
I. IMPROVEMENT AND COST
c.- ''7':
1. The ~e shall fund the construction of a
parking lot and a concrete boat launching ramp on the Access
-rH~ . S7/Jr/-~
pursuant to the specifications of the State. R~or ~,
tJo It /... IJEIMlt, (.112<;,1;. -tIle C I):")" F'alt.. rl 4-t., 0/"- fll'fl:~II)~.,."ii: errt:f t.o
p.ar~;ta-l fJo~mel'lt. 1~.;i..l~.l-be-ntB'de> within a reasonable time after
7'
'e
e
the City submits verified proof of authorized expenditures
and the cost thereof incurred and paid, provided the City
has substantially contracted for and provided for a timely
.
completion of the improvement and development of the Access.
2. The State shall have the right to review and
approve the Access plans.
3. The State shall have the right, but shall not
be obligated to make additional improvements on the Access
as needed to provide access to the lake.
4. The State shall provide signs informing the
public that the Access is cooperatively provided by the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the City.
5. The State shall provide signs necessary for
the operation of the access,
such as Boaters Rules.,~
Ar;:;G!!ow Ruleo.
II. OPERATION OF THE ACCESS
1. The City shall maintain the Access for use by
the public.
The access shall remain open fo~ a minimum of
16 hours per day between the hours of 5:00 A.M. and
midnight.
S tlJJErr It:)
COli LA u'1
-rt.'
2. The State shall have the right o~
-rHJE t ,'1-'1 It,..t.cr-"
o,nor. ...~........ AgeeD'S .\Clftd.efW!J changes in the land, 11 improvements,
-t-I-II11'" 11 (J. IE..
structures, buildings or signs, ~ ~ made or erected on
the Access.. w~hnut ltVPJ.V.p.p~~.
_ TJf rr. c..rrJl NO"-- t.Jt) It" IN1(()/V I) f1,./,. t ~
.3. J:1,Q 61 tc mo.RJ.,.,:&er sh allV' 0 v~t.he~Ej
restrict public use of
th e A ccess a ~ 61. ~.....tri."IDe-w.if.~bl-~e
"
exnress. writ:t.q.~sen.t.-~~
I I 1. LIABILITY
Each party agrees that it will be responsible for
its own acts and the results thereof to the
extent
authorized by the law and shall not be responsible for the
acts of the other party and the results thereof. The
State's liability shall be governed by the provisions of the
Minnesota Tort Claims Act,
Minnesota Statutes,
Section
3.736, and other applicable law.
~~~~17f-~I~m~~~~".:F~~'~}~wm:1l!.Jl'i~.?""n'......,...,...,.""",""""''''.,.,_...,,"'',,....''',...-.....-:If._ ~".,-.........,...,...~-
IV. TERM
The Agreement shall commence on the date it is
e
encumbered by the Commissioner OI Finance and be perpetual,
except-as amended by the par~ies.
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
CITY OF STILLWATER
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION
By:
Special Assistant Attorney General
e Date:
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE - ENCUMBERED
By:
Title:
Date:
i
tl ,
"~~-:<;.' '<,;
~H:~;~;'
,':.-"'.- ,
i
I
!
I
!
I
i
LILYAGR.DOC
.
~~;~~~'_Ml',,"_n,p~~.,.~P'#':..,~m-,'~~'~~.
'.~~~""'~~"""'~"" ...."'...;1'....,.
..
e
~
e
r illwater
~ - - - ~
THE B I R T H P lAC E 0 F ,hi I H H E SOT A ')
APPLICATION TO CONSUME
Applicant Information
Name 0 f ,:.t' 9 ani z at i .:.r,_____5_~h..'!!!:.~~<J._~~t~b_a!:~_~~_________________________
Applicant Name(Full)
Robe<< /John
-------------------------------------------------
St t'eet Addt'ess___!...~8.J!_!:!:e.E.~_2.i:t::.'::~!~_________
Birth Date
City_Q~~P~~Jt~~~______
State t1.i..nn.
Zip__~~O!~_______
Home Ph .:,ne ___t+.J.J::.!..!.JJ_______
Work Phone #28-2282
Facility Information
Pad( .:.t' faci 1 i ty te. be ,.tsed__Q!.../J~i_~!!:_&_3.E:'!:'!~~!Li:{.:.ed_j.~____
Date to be used__1P_~~_~L~2~J_!..~qO Time to be,used__~33~____________
NUflibet' ,,;:.f pet',?ons ex pect ed____-?-.Oi>_____o______________-.:___
. '
P lolt' pose (soft ba 11 game, wedd i ng, et c. ) ___~rd..t..!!E-!:.~_t;2~!!!!:!!.e_~____________
Type of activity(f'.md t'aiset', d2\r1cing, music, etc.)___j!!:!1'!:._~~~_____
Check Appropriate Information
XXX Beer to C,:q'"lsume
________Liquor to Consume
XXXXX Beet' tCI Sell & C.:.nsume
________Liquor to Sell & Consume
Wine
C,:,nSlJrlle
..... -
I" I_I
l...Ji ne
t.:, Sell &
Cons Uflle
Security Information(Intet'nal Use Only)
p.:, 1 ice Officet' Req'Jit'ed by City? _~.&A__Yes. _______N.:,.
Officer Rate of Pay $
Mail License To: (If different than applicant)
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612.439.6121
~
~
~
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTMENT ____ E T RF.
ME=:TING DATE April 3, 1990
---------------
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (8riefly outline what the request is)
Purchase roll and fold ladder seven foot six inch top step with
---------------------------------------------------------------------
side rails. To be used for washing tops of trucks and changing
---------------------------------------------------------------------
____1..ijJ.E_'t.-~_':..1~_~_~~_c;.,tt~~~~~2l2~.E_~21~.1~_!ol~2__c..9_':..1_d._~_~_':."S_e_d.-_i..r:.____
___~2_~n~5J_~_h_~~_~~~~_~~ii~~_i~_g~~~B~~~_2~~~2~~~~__-----------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------~------------~-------------------------------
-----------------
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------~--------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------~---------------------------------------~-
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline
associated with this request and
needed to fund the request)
the costs, if any, that are
the prop.jsed s.jl.1rce 'jf the fl.lnds
Price is $395.00 out of our capital outlay budget.
---------------- . -------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
YES
NO _~_
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST IT~~S MUST BE SU8MITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A
MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS-PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCI.L MEETING I~ER. TO aE P~e:D IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUaMITTED av -L~~~~ DATE ~~
e
..
e
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
STILLWATER CITY CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Amending. Section 29.01, Subdivision 1, (3) of the
Stillwater City Code is hereby amended to hereafter read as
follows:
"(3) MULTIPLE DWELLINGS. Multiple Dwellings shall be
charged a separate charge for each dwelling unit located in
the dwelling as follows:
(a) 2 unit Dwelling - 95% of the minimum charge set
forth in (1) for each unit within dwelling.
(b) More than 2 unit dwelling - 75% of the minimum
charge set forth in (1) for each unit within the
dwelling.
~
(c) Condominium - 70% of the minimum charge set forth
in (1) for each unit within the dwelling.
(d) Federally Certified Senior Housing - 56% of the
minimum charge set forth in (1) for each unit within
the dwelling.
~, fO
(e) Multiple Dwelling Overage Charges - Overage
charges for multiple dwellings shall be at the rate of
~O for every 1,000 gallons of water used in excess
of the percentage of the minimum charge multiplied
times 10,000 gallons.
(f) In determining charges for nonresidential
properties, the sewer charges shall be based upon
actual consumption of water for the previous billing
period."
Section 2. In all other ways, Chapter 29 shall remain in full
force and effect.
Section 3. The ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage and publication according to law.
Adopted by Council this
day of April, 1990.
~
.~
,
e
Attest:
CITY OF STILLWATER
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Mary Lou Johnson, Clerk
e
e
e
~
e
/
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and city Council ~0
FR: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DA: March 30, 1990
RE: SEWER RATES
In accordance with Council direction at the workshop on March 27, 1990, staff
has reviewed the proposed sewer rates (on a per dwelling unit basis) and revised
the applicable per unit minimum charge percentages. The revised percentages
reflect a 5 percent (5%) reduction from the actual flows worksheet presented to
the Council on March 27, 1990 for each multiple dwelling type.
The reason for this reduction is based on the fact that only one year of history
(1989) was available for comparison and a 5 percent (5%) margin would be
reasonable.
Therefore, staff recommends setting the minimum charge per dwelling unit
percentages as follows:
Duplexes
Apartments
Condos
Federally Certified Senior Housing
95%
75%
70%
56%
When the computer changes to the billing structure are made, we will add the
ability to accumulate date for a history file to have more than one year of data
available for review next year.
e
e
e
SPECIAL MEETING
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
March 13, 1990
4:30 p.m.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson.
Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim
and Mayor Abrahamson.
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Recording Secretary Schaubach
Press: Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Julie Kink, st.. Croix Valley Press
Sharon Baker, The Courier
DISCUSSION OF OAK GLEN NEGOTIATING TEAM
Council discussed the appointment of a negotiating team to
negotiate the price of the Oak Glen Golf Course with its
owner. It was determined that the Council should have two
representatives on the team because of the divergent opinions
of the Council regarding purchase of the Golf Course.
Hotion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble
to appoint Nile Kriesel, David Magnuson, Tom Hay, Ron Langness,
Tom Farrell, and Ann Bodlovick to an Advisory Negotiating
Committee and to come back to the City Council with a recommended
purchase price, with the understanding that the Committee can
request additional assistance from City Staff as well as obtain
information from contract personnel. (All in favor)
APPROVAL OF RECYCLING AGREEMENTS
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick,
Farrell to adopt the appropriate
agreement with Washington County for
Distribution. (Resolution No. 8254)
seconded by Councilmember
Resolution entering into
Curbside Recycling Grant
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim, and
Mayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick,
Farrell to adopt the appropriate
agreement with Goodwill/Easter Seal
(Resolution No. 8255)
seconded by Councilmember
Resolution entering into
for recycling services.
Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim, and
Hayor Abrahamson
Nays - None
1
,'it~
stillwater City CO~lncil Minutes
Special Meeting I
March 13, 1990
OTHER BUSINESS
Motion by Counci member Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember
Farrell to appro e the request for "Exemption from Lawful
Gambling License", and waive the 30 day waiting period for City
to object, from st. Mary's Church to hold a raffle. (All in
favor)
Council discu sed additional directional signage for the
Police Departm nt and Fire Department entrances.
Mayor Abrahams n discussed a phone call he received regarding
excess cars pa ked behind the High School.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Counci member Bodlovick, seconded
Farrell to adjou n the meeting at 5:15 p.m.
Session to discuss Labor Relations Negotiations.
by Councilmember
into Executive
(All in favor)
Resolutions:
No. 8254 - Enteri g into agreement with Washington Co. for
recyc ing services
No. 8255 - Enteri g into agreement with Goodwill/Easter Seal
for r cycling services
ATTEST:
Submitted by:
Shelly Schaubach
Recording Secretar
MAYOR
2
e
e
e
PHOI)lE (612) 296-6159
'I (j 'tJ-t..-:1.-GI fJl--'xr~'%'
NTOF ',> c.~,\'17.~311IS/-'0
MINNESOTA DEPARTME PUBLIC SAFETY q;J ,. pS9h'~( \87)
LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ~ M,4R 1990 ~~
333 SIBLEY · ST. PAUL, MN 55101 II} PAlO ~
, ~ C~LLWA~'" ,~::;;,
APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OR CITY ON SALE WINE LICENSE ~. MHI. TEff, ,-:V
NOT TO EXCEED 14% OF ALCOHOL BY VOLUME .f'~a . ~{)l
1'5282 LZS1.S1
EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED. If a corporation, an officer shall execute this application. If a sip, a
partner shall execute this application. If this is a first application attach a copy of the articles of incorporation and
_~by-Iaws. -
Applicants Name (Business, Partnership, Corporation)
"^'~\ ~ ~
B~~td~
C"
I~\\~~
..
~'ZLtr
Is this application
If a transfer. give name of former owner
," '.'
State of \ \ . .
Incorporation \'\l\ ~~~
CORPORATIONS
Date of ~ ~~
Incorporation ~\\J
\ \
Is corporation authorized to do business in Minnesota? ~Yes 0 No
If a subsidiary of another corporation, give name and address of parent corporation
Certificate
Number
6~'$'
THE BUILDING
Are the property taxes deliquent? 0 Yes CANo
~scribe the premises to be licensed () ~1-
~~\.~b
Has the building owner any connection
direct or indirect, with the applicant? 0 Yes ~No
~~ ~ ~~ ~"l%L
Name of r. ~
Building Ownet9~"'\:) ~
C\.... Owners ""
~ ~\\~\6Z-Address '(~ I
\\0
THE RESTAURANT
hat is the
Seating capacity? :;."S
How many months per year \.
will the restaurant be open? ,7-.
During what hours will Number of people \1'..
food be available? 1O,t:SJ~~~ \\~~estaurant will employ?\3?\\\ '\\..)
Will food service be the principal
business of the restaurant? 'ttI Yes 0 No
I
If this restaurant is in conjunction with anothier business (resort, etc.), describe the business.
I
~
"
~\~
e
OTHER INFORMATION
- 1. Have the applicant or associates been g , nted an on-sale non-intoxicating malt beverage (3.2) and/or a "set-up" license
in conjunction with this wine license? :q. Yes 0 No
I
2. Is the applicant or any of the associates n this application a member of the county board or the city council which will
issue this license? 0 Yes ~o, .
If yes, in what capacity? . (If the applicant is the spouse of a member of the governing body, or
another family relationship exists, the m mber shall not vote on this application.)
3. During the past license year has a summ ns been issued under the liquor civil liability law (Dram Shop) (MS. 340A 802).
o Yes ~o If yes attach a copy of th summons.
4. Has the applicant or any of the associat s in this application been convic~~ during the past five years of any violation of
federal, state or local liquor laws in this tat~ or any other state? 0 Yes [)\No If yes, give date and details.
5.~' Does any person other than the applica s, have any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures or equipment in the
licensed premises? ~ Yes 0 No If ye give names and details. ~ l\: ~ \: e
6. Have the applican,ts any interests, direc Iy or indirectly, in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota? 0 Yes ~o
If yes, give name and address of the es ablishment. .'
I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REA
MY OWN KNOWLEDGE.
ANSWERS ARE TRUE AND C RR CT OF
(/
IF LICENSE IS ISSUED B THE COUNTY BOARD; REPORT OF COUNTY ATTORNEY
I certify that to the best of my knowled e the applicants named above are eligible to be licensed. 0 Yes 0 No
If no, state reason.
Signature County Attorney
County
Date
REPOR BY POLICE OR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
This is to certify that the applicant, and t e associates. named herein have not been convicted within the past five years
for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, Municipal or County.
Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liqu r, except as follows
~
Pol'~", Sheriff Department Name
Signature
Form No. 235-Application (or Retail License to
Sell Non.intoxicnting Malt Liquors "ON" Premises, (Rev, 5.13-81)
Miller,Davis Co.. Minneapolis
~
RETAIL "ON SALE"
J
cou~~a;}~~~~;I.} __..._.~~,\,.___._....._OF_~~__.;
To the.... ~1Fl. .f!db~.... ..............of the....... .....'~{!:r ................of.~e.t.-L~
............~~.u.~.~...............,......,State of Minnesota:
........_........:,.........,...................,...~%.'::?......,Q....~~~~...m......~\c:..;........................................................................,.............'....
hereby appl.~.<}.....for a license ff7: the tenn Of..........:::~~~\~:\?.........................................................\K.....................
from the"...............,.,...............,................t\~~..........,day Of.........~~~................................................................." 19~\J.., to sell
At Retail Only, Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquors,
:.~~.:~~~~~:.:;~=.=~~-~;;i'~~"t..~~~==:::::=::==::::::::
de8CriJJ~'''':''';Jlows, to-wu........."v...~............~..,.....,.\.\~~...........~~.......................................................,........
:~~~=~=====
and to that end represent,';:>.and state??.as follows:
That said, applWant.............,......\~..............~..........citizen.........of the ~!!,i~rl States; of good moral chaTfwter
aM repute; and ha,?.....attaineil the age of ~1 years,' that,.................~.............................propri,etor..~..of th8
establishment for which t'M license will be issued if this application is granted.
That 'M manufacturer of such 'M11rintoxicating malt liquors has any ownership, in whole. or in part,
in said, business of said, appUcant.....,or any interest therein;
. That 8aid appliC<L~t.....:make~...thi8 ap~Ucation p.urtJUant ~nd subject to all the laws of the State of
MLnnesota and the ordLnances and regulations of said,.........~,~.................................................................................m.......
applicMle thereto, which are lwreby m,ade a part lwreof, and hereby atree~..to observe and obey the 8ame,'
..............................................................-...........................................................-..............................................-......................-......
.........................................................
(Here state other nqwrementa, if &n7. of local resralat1ona)
Each applicant further states that -.he is not now the holder of, nor has -.he made application for,
nor does -.he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
Da~~~......._.I....!_...~., lfJ.f.t?....
,')~:,; .:.~
~.l...-'" '\\ . f
~\C..J.... . .1
'/ ,', ,-',
~6 "
v-; " /f;?t ~\ ,,~
.f 'Y:JJrf'o.
~ "t:'" '
t"'j'a...,., ~~":~ ~\
, .,y,....- ~'^ .~\
. .0... ---- ~ v --
-,>>, 'l".k, :::-'.~
'<~'<~ Cd
~; ~ "f~"'~." ,'j,y
t?. ~ ~ ..~
';:.1 ".- ,~'v
~-~. . ;<.;,t,'"''
c;, ,... 'I,n,~.~
l... .~ G:" "W~
-...-..........................-................................................................................u...
() .,1pplicant......
P. O. ~eB8-1,;;,..t....dt.,-,~.~..~......~.....
_......~.~.r'..&1./..:L,.,..~,~..?..9cf'.
":t;l I t";j d ~ ~ ~ ..
Q
[ {l ~, 0 Cl \
.... ~i ~ 1'1 ~ ~
"'l 0
I ~ <lOt ~
1 00 ~ ~
<'e <'e ~ P:l
~
~ t:::: ~ ~ Cl ~
r "",. "" ~
~ - ~
~ ~ 0
-- t:'-t
- 0 -- f""'t\
~ 0 .....
t: = ~\ ~ r
. = ~
~ ~
~ = r.n. !
t: ~ ~ ~ _.
0 -
0 ~ I -
1'1 ~ <'e,. -
I 00 ""'. Cl -
(':) -. ~
i ~
i ~ ~ I I tn.
~ 0
"",. "",.
i-.. ~ = (':) I --
r r CJG <'e t;;i
= ...
00 I
<'e
'J/.']J.'in{$ ~1- p'U.'v fi~01tJi' /i!jU.110{) ~'J. 10 'lI.o'!'fTYpunu'UlO
-V-;;J. 'lI.'Jt1:]J.m ~'J.. 11101[nm Qf/'lJ.'iXY]1/J.U. 10 ~V1189'] ~'J. O'J. 'J..U.~8UO'J 11VlLS p.l'OOf[ 'lI.moJ; au puv 'u.71.0J; 1.fons jo
p.LvOf[ wnOJ; ~'J.. 10 'J.'lI.'JB'UOO ~'J pi. nm wnOJ; /J.u.v U.1 ~V8 .Loj ~S'lI.9;rn :mS9111V1f.9 p.J.VOf[ fiq.U110{) 0:( :~ON
"'U'V'UL.l.fD'lIl)."'." ..... ,...,..",..,." ....., '..... ,....', .......... . ,..... ,......... ,..... ,., fif[
''J[.L~1:J wnOJ;
'}S'Jnr
I
ilO .Jl.MOJ; HHJ; .flO au Of[ .Jl.MOJ; {flHJ;
..'......... 6["........'.'.....'.....'.'....."...'..'.........'.................. '...'IN'J. va
'1L0'!1W11 v 1L11.f!f'J'Tl ~!f. 1L1 .lo/ P"'!1ddv 'JS1L'J0']1 ~'J. /0 'J01L'V71.S91 rli'J. 0:;' 'j.U'iJSUO;; PJP
............6r..'....................,........................................ '10 /J.'Vp...............................................,'J'/f.!f. 1L0 'U.O']11110S'J.J. Iiq 1'irJ'V,+S
pu'V l41Lno{) P'!'VB
ur........................................................................... .....-.........'/0 'U.ITl.OJ; ~'l 10 p.J.vof[ 'U.ITl.OJ; 9'1[1- 'l'D1{'l P?Iu.J.~ 1iq'iJ.J.~ 8"! 'J.I
-..........................................-.........-..-................. .LO .Jl.MOJ; {.......................................................................ilO .J: J;){ fl OD
'nlo~4uuJlif }O 31t?l~
'1!']PllS
.................................................................................. ............................................
. /iinJ.J.on ll' 141L11
..............................................................................................................................
............. 6 r I................................................,.......... .................,............, '1I.1l1Jr I,...."........."..,.".."'....,..........,..... ......"", ",
"......,..""" "'~V p-a:roa
--V1'111~1J. puv 6m'lYl 'J'/f.'+ "l.nm /J.1.d
..liJ1'l.b11 !f.1vw. p1L'n'1X1'JXO'J.1L1-'U01L /0 ~
6.lTnfi. (Joy. 10 '[XY!.J.'dd 'V 1L1"l.?1"1 I~
-'V011ddv u1"l.'J'J'Tl Q1{,1- PU'inJ.I.'WfXJ'2.L
'68'JU.1snq P1VB /0 'lmpuoo -:i'l{'+ 0'+ p'll.J!JTYJ.'iJ.J. tnLo"!'J.
11.']U1 f1.1LW11ddv ~'J 'J1LrlUppn! .L110 1L1 !f'D1{!f. puv '.L0'rl.b11 11L1+'VO'!x011L1 .LO
B 'J1f.1- O!f. 11Ly.'lYl~.J. 01'V1. 1bI.'V P'J1.v1oyz. '1lfY!+vonddv 8'!'l/.'J jo ~vp ~'j. 01 J.O'!J11
!f.1L'lxyndd'V ppJ8 'JV1{!f. --lpd1mou'J[ .L71.0 10 pr.Iq rIf'J 0,+ 11L']J.'lXJddv n '1.(,O'!}.
Ol{, 1/J.11L11OO PrTJ6 Jo Jl1J.~B puv fi?UJ.fX/4V !l!J.1L1100 '''{Y'd'U;f']S.l-apun 'J1.f.I
{'....".' ....................................." ....' ......". .....'..',...,.. J 0 /J.}.'lI.11O {)
'nlO~3UUJl1lf }O Jll?l~
1":X>C~~~$-iM
~ ~66L '; /dN~snS<U1dX~ uc~ss UJUJO:) ^V'J.';;"~~.., ..........................................~.."........,..,.,.....""'."""""...,.,~"""""'..."".."..,...,.."
'oj .,,>_, 108 /\3:::;,1 IV!:l ".",.!.,~.'-.\ ',\
<.. ~':t>'lo '}.' -.,,~':~ : ."
;'; ~~~~~.l;j::'~~ :)~~nd ~'iflON ;{::~~T':;!lo/ i ........';;;;C;;~A7j......... ......'fi"~Y.i)h.... ...:...........1' 'f'........
......L.,,;_~;~,;,,~ ~ -p[)6r '^j5n'Yj/rJo fl;P~d.. 'I'll
_..............~p.....:'..".._.......t?7'CZ-Z;'';!:-;;::::;,.......,,-,.... 2J~' 'fJ.LOJ3[[ 0; womspuv 'P;)q'!-lQsqn~'
.' ?/ ..- Y c..Y CJ::P'1.mDUq "mo...........c;0;7~...mJo .,,,, ,.w ""110'11'''''' 1'1"'
- ~~
11.1 ~ s'J1LrIU'iJ'}.v'JS ~'+ 'J.v1J.'J pu'V :1LO'!'J'VO']ldd'V 1L11il']U1 ~'J.. /0 s'JU'iJ'}.1LOO 'd'lf.'J /0 puv 'j(YJ.l'iJl{1 1LO'!:;.VJol 'J'IU 10
......'J1Lv0,]1ddv P'!V9 /0 88'iJ1L1sn.q 'J'/f.'+fO ~IMm01L'J[ 1111I'.......'V7[......,..~.........'+'V'I1.'J. !......'J.1Lvo,]lddv p;nu.vu 1L11.fnm 'd'lf.'}.
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................<...............
:~~..~::=.~:~..~~~.~..:~...~:~.=..~~:.~..~~.~..~:::::::::::~:::::::::::::I!~'1/~:q""'",,~'.'.'.'.':::::.~.'.~.1.:._ ".,~. -v'j;:X....:;tC<.t'~([
...-vv.:p:X:<;"Yif20/j?JlO .J: .Vlfl 0:)
, 'l?lOsaUu~1af }O 311?l~
J{O I.z V'O I Jl III JIA
e
~
e
if
.-
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. Vj90-9
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: 406 South Hemlock Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Residential
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Virgil Crowder
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT LOCATION:
A variance to the sideyard setback requirements for the conversion of an
existing garage into personal living quarters.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to convert an existing one car garage into a family room. The
sideyard setback requirements for a home (habitable living space) is ten feet,
so a five foot variance is being sought. The neighbor to the South is
approximately twelve feet from the property line resulting in a seventeen foot
separation between structures.
A new garage will be constructed in the rear yard with access off Oak Street.
The new garage meets the setback requirements for accessory structures in this
zoning district.
The applicant indicates the conversion of the garage into personal living
space is much more efficient than adding an addition to the house at another
location. The placement of the new garage is easily accessible off Oak Street.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The existing driveway curb cut shall be replaced with a vertical curb
and a new driveway curb cut and shall be constructed by the applicant
according to the Public Works Director's requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for reasonable use of the land and
buildings. This is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Slte Plan.
PLANNING COMMISS.ION RECOMMENDATI.QN: Approved.
'e
-j:.
ro
5'
:/
0'
'"
-
/"-'
~
e
e
. .........~-...-.~. ....' .-, -.. .
,,/i f..
t
;:;"-b "1t!.3;t!:t:
-. I~
I.
N
r<>
. f' .~..
i . .1"-
~' -,
i
.. I ;
(>1
-. I
!
!
!
I
I
i
I
i
1:
7"
~
~
:;::,
~
f
"'f'
lr1
~~-
1.
l'
~
....
. 0
~
<:. ;-
oS
'Jo~1
\~\J.'-=rl
, ~ d-\\' --> I
~'
<(-----.- '\ --~
^
I t~
o_
f
i-f
I ()
I
-J.,
f
t6'
O~\Z
ST
o
p
of
P
~
r
\
I
I
\
\
..,..
'-
..."/
f,.
11.\
~ ! .
!
i
I \
I
I ':0
; r
} ,-
i ...
!1
--~ -
!
i
I ....
..
'"
.'
~
I ,
I
C
c-
.,
v
~
.
-
'-
-
(
I L.. --7'
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
~ CASE NO. DP/V/90-10
~
~
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: 220 East Myrtle Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning District: CBD
Applicant1s Name: Tom Schweitz
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description:
A variance to the Sign Ordinance for placement of a forty five square foot
banner sign.
Discussion:
The request is to place a three foot by fifteen foot blue and white banner
sign on the East side of the Old Post Office Building. A variance is needed
due to the number of signs. The sign will be located between the South window
and the corner of the building on the East side as shown on the attached
picture. The purpose of this banner sign is to allow the building to be
identified from Main Street. The business owners feel that, when visitors come
to Stillwater, they tend to shop on Main Street and do not venture West toward
Second Street.
The color of the banner will match the existing signs on Second Street and
will not cover any architectural features of the building. However, the sign
is quite large. The logo does not identify specific businesses but simply
states that there are shops located in the building. The sign request requires
a Design Permit. The Design Review Committee reviewed the request with the
following comments.
DESIGN REVIEW RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
COMMENTS: The sign does not destroy or cover any important architectural
features of this historic building.
The sign is attractive and is in proportion with existing
windows.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. No additional signage is allowed.
2. The sandwich board previously placed on the sidewalk in front of the
business is illegal and shall not be placed on site.
3. Violation of these conditions may result in revocation of this
approval.
4. The sign shall be securely fastened to the building.
e
~
~
CASE NO. DP/V/90-10 - Continued
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for reasonable use of the building
and the variance requested is the minimum that will accomplish the purpose of
the Sign Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Picture of building.
- Drawing of sign.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
e
APPROXU1ATE SIGN
LOCATION
e
.,.'
~
-. ,.-.....
.-
e
e
e
~
~
3t
_""?>
--
---
.J~
,
\
\
i
,
\
\
\
;;
\
\
;
,
I
;
,
\
\.5/
~l
\
I
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
"
'\
\
,
\
.\
\
\
1
;
l
\
"':V/
..
~
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/90-12
Planning Commission Meeting:
Marcil 12, 1990
Project Location: 1405 South Sixth Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicant's Name: Jeffrey H. Skinner
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A Special Use Permit to conduct an over-the-phone service business in a
residential district.
e
DISCUSSION:
The request is to conduct a small, over-the-phone service business out of a
home. The applicant has stated that all business will be handled
over-the-phone at the stated address. The owner will then make service calls
to customers. There will only be one delivery per month to the home and no
customers traffic or additional employees. (See attached letter.)
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. No sign shall be allowed.
2. No employees of the business shall come to the residence for assigned
work.
3. Deliveries are limited to two per week.
4. Any work related vehicles shall be parked on the residence site.
5. The permit shall be reviewed on a complaint basis.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The proposed use will not be lnJurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of this Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter from Mr. Skinner
Site plan.
~ PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
'AC'lOO
.l.
Case Number,,5-rJ..Pj.fj.a::.l~
F P'd (')71 og
ee al ___":.:'_~_________
Date filed _~!.~Jj.JJ!._____
~
,PLANNING ADlv\lNISTRATIVE FORN\
L . ~ P + l' LIQlh. S. I?-th ;Sb11J.f" f}..
Street ocatlon or roperlY: ':"L ~...L.:.__J:e______.:.'\..~___________________
Legal Doscription of Property: ~f_L"it~@~Df~.).:i:lj)Qi~..\L~.~WJ.JJ.i~~Jl"'d. Adt\ .-/;J 'Sf'/llk^'\-
Owner: Na~e _;S~[t1:e<-!__1L-5A~(Jn~L-_-------------------
Address -1.'!:LQ_~~_6-r~-~L---_----- Phone: _!i3_cz.:.[~Y-O__
Ao'olicant (if other then oW]1er): Name ---------------------------------
. .
Address______________________________ Phone:_______________
Type or Request:'
___ Rezoning ___ Approvalor Preliminary Plet
X Special Use Permit ___ Approval or ~inaI. Plat
___ Variance ___ Other ____~_______..______
Description of Request: ___Sf!.~~t_J..).:5_~_h.L_P1.:.t-:lQ.-a-C"'O.L1Ju~t
_.cb_s.l:22cJl~~3.-iLLes.s.--a.Q.t-D-f--mT_-ila..t?2e..----------- '
____________~~~~~lt~~-)-----------~.- --~-------7----
Signature af APPlicant:c7J'IjI'::~
Date or Public Hearing: _____________________________________~__.:.~___
'NOTE: Sketch of proposed 'property and structure to be drawn. ')n 'oack oi t.'lls form o~-.
tQ.ched, showing the following: \'t. \S \;- . i :."",,;~_,,
1. North direction. ~~' ..c.. S><) r,~,~
2. LocCi.tion oi proposed structure on lot. :::::: #'~V.O'r.}
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs. ~ .~,..~ ';'~ ... ,
. .... ... ,:~,_,"'" r.-': /.~",
4. DlmenslOns 01 proposea structure. OJ .'(\'>;'.'!" ... i,.>,'
5. Street names. (j) ,,'t'. .:.,.
6. Location of adja.cent existing buildings. \-- . .:i.':/ :/ ~\
7. Other information as may be requested.
""'I, ,,(;~..
-: ,I -; ;j':.;;''./
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho 'Planning Commission on ___________ (date)-
~
subieC7 to the following conditions: ____________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
~ Approved___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subiec to the
"II' d'"
.0 oWing con litons: ________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use. other side)
e
I
. 4+r(1 %
, 0& j I/LtJ'rfU/L Pl Cln."-'Ln t c.::rrnn-u 5 St0n
t-}-
5tiA~Uc~ct~ t,L-t~ COLA-\\CJ?
To tuham 'LP- m~ C.-anCwLn "0
., '1'1'1 )L () QfYlQ.,
1 S J (l FF rczV 1+. Z; lU'\XLQ..l 1 I: WY\. CL
~lCK\J1.A in U\L ~ o+. '51: i /I LC.~o1-~""l .
L~ ~u~OOSL a~ -lhi5 ~ 15 W
q We..- CL c\aJ:.~ ~pe~~1an 0+ V\.oLO
:t in-hnci m c-CJY"Cl~ CL ~mc...,~L LDLroou) ~
i.ca.f:,YU..'\t 'a"."~.QJ,,,S tAOYY\ ~ hatY\JL.
tnc.o.na cd-: lli 05 '5. ~ U1 ~ J f:) \.'\.Qwd
~ "6~et.O uSL ~ CLppL\cah~
b.L ~\O~. I ~'ncGlL ~ ~
Sola- '\0'\.()~ 0+ ~~d b,tx6l~ili.'S51
00 -tJ'\1It2- W il,t bL 11.0 ~Io~ CA..CL-fFi c..
C Ol'nLVO'f, @J\. 'iOLn~ Gmn 'Sc0d ~/\Dpc~ .
..L ho..v'-6- L:.on'ftlt..L-ltte..cl CL ~~nla.lL O~Lt.L
,Gn ~hL ~5"--~I1.-f- o.f: i"{\)1; n<lTY\9- ;...Y1
iLdu.c.n r weLl trt.L~ pJlonL C-Ct.Lt5 GLom
\ ~~l)e.. c.v:&iZJTYlM:5 . .I I Lo ill ~o i::J
!~ C-u-6t-m'U':-S-t:a ~ LU~ ~ d S 'r ptLopJ;:;.CJS ~
: 50 -lh.,Q/\',e.- LO LLl \:12- (\,0 c\.,\~tJrYlQ.A.. tr,c<-.fFic.-
i Q.On;u,\'b Q),\ 1;o:lnh G~ &:;u~ ?^O~'1:'t-,'
: ,R-n.~ (Y)C'vtY fl.1JL 'SCU.d bL~6ll't.t65 weLL
. ~ de.Lu:,e,vuJ -t~ CL- ,p, 0: 1D0)( LAL%,S1L'wd
:Ln ~ IICuY\..L. ~\)QA.u....<; lOOuJd.
: 'ax- et* ffiuD-t- ~ I mon:Ul . DvjiuQ~
~
'e
~
10)1 k.P.;). b &'-wd pl\.o()k~'
r ~ -tnCL:t-.. I CUY1. 0 ffi1 c:-
\.J u.t~~ ~ lC-JL ~ ~~ c.orrl.J)'t.llnd.~
<1.nd ~ th.e... e.~~ Df f)tLUicO-n.\ CtS LO~ll .
~ '5 Lnu~ \\o~ b. cd' .~ a..ppGea:tt!Jh
+&/'l0- CO?LCJOJ? Lt~ ~ wLLc bz..
, ~piLW-Ld .
e..
G'lGJ-vlC " ~ OLL J
;/iffI~~J~
-
, .
t
c
IS)
-
te
...
~
~
~
-
-
~
-
f)
e
--.
I
\
i
~
~\
~\
V)!
!
~
1.
i
i
i
.
,
\
-
f
\1
,
~ ,-
jf '-' 1
10
::r
,
..;.,
I,
l'
'0
\ ~
_.
I
_--'..li:L~e
-
\
\ ~
,""""'L..':::J-
\ ~~-
l "
\ ~
~< -:s ~
\~~
, '"
10
f'
o
~
-
"0
q)
..s'\
~ )'"
~ 0
0~
,
\
\
I
l
,
:
.
,
r
...,
~
o
......
~
~
.-~~~..".i<~;~'..'"
-
!
-;.. . -~4~.'~J-'''---'._'-~_.
';I "Cll V - ,--
~. ._4
f. .J?I- ? LU'd"J
. ~
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
e CASE NO. V/90-13
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: 322 West Hickory Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family
Applicant1s Name: Gregory Holmquist
Type of Application: Variance
Zoning District: RB
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A variance to the front and rearyard setback requirements for the construction
of a home.
e
DISCUSSION:
The request is to construct a new house on a 50 ft. x 150 ft. lot. The lot
size of 7,500 square feet is the minimum requirement in the RB, Two Family
Residential District. A home was previously located on this site. A fire
occurred and caused extensive damage so the house was torn down. The proposal
is to site the house on the lot using North Martha Street as the front. A
thirty foot front setback is required, seventeen is proposed. A twenty five
foot rearyard setback is required, seven is proposed. The side setbacks are
adequate forty six feet, thirty required, and thirty eight feet, ten required.
If the house was oriented to Hickory Street, a three foot sideyard setback
would be required. The house located east of the site (to the rear) is
approximately fifteen feet from the property line. The rear setback of the
proposed house is seven feet, leaving twenty two feet between the structures.
(The proposal does not appear to impact adjacent structure. However, it would
be possible to meet the setbacks with a house design planned for the site.)
The property slopes downward at the north. A grading plan should be submitted
to determine how run-off from the site will be handled to minimize erosion and
to contain run off on the development site.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A grading plan shall be submitted before building permits are issued.
2. The driveway apron and curbing shall be constructed before occupancy,
according to the Public Works Director's requirements.
3. The house shall have a ten foot rearyard setback and front yard setback
of fourteen feet.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
e
- Site Plan
- Building Plan
- Application Form.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
l'4C 10\).
.......
-.' . . .
., ,
Case ~umbe; y!jl:.!..J___~::"-' ~:.:' :'"
i:i/
. 0.-.
Fee Paid __-.fl______.:.___
Date Fil~~ -'?:'f.~2------
r. . ...,
.,,;) --
a':
."
PLANNING ADl'v\INISTRATIVE FOR1\r\
. '
., ,
Street Location of Property) 3.J._!J:.__l!.)_l:lJ..!:Je.'aJl.y__________________..;.____ "
LGgal Doscription of Prop~rty: .i-_o:t._~plec.k_LQ..<;Jf...~t!~Jes..a.rJd_1lJrJi'~JJJ.1.t-hotJ"
Own e r: N a m e _ ht..' -{fa .&_y._..1J.L1.. .1I:.gJ.~(:nq.M.L <:.f.. ___ __ __________ _____'-__
Address 'lg.s'-~'2.9Je:f.!.J1~>?.i.'Cq,,!.!=._______ Phone: .:tJ_L-:'PJt.P.5:.__
Ap'plicant (if other then owner): Name ____:-_______________"___'__________
Address______________________________ Pho~e:--------~------
Type of Request:'
'. 0.'
___ Rezoning ___ Approval or Preliminary Plat
, . ,
___ Special Use Permit __~ Approval or ~inal Plat
~_ Variance .:.__ Other _________:.._~_~__.~__
" Description of Request: ( 'i.:S?-e.-_dLq~~.ff!:t..d..-==_Af!:Lg__e.c;..LiLi:.}----
.. --r!__'-~'f.:.P..!:...I~1..--~!..!f---6!!'-'!i-!- __~_"L~~rj..j3j~...k L'?~L__
. .~~tt!~~-g~~-J2t~~~-~~-~-~l~~~-----------------~--~----~----__
. Signature a~ Applicant: ~~__
Date of Public Hearing: ____.:________________________________________
NOTE: Sketch of proposed 'property and structure to be dra'ijU.on back oi this iorm or.... ;;~.~'
tQ.ched, showing the iollowing: ' ,'. .. ' .' .'"c::.,::;>.J" , ~' >,~~}'\' .
1. North direction. :. - /"""/ .' ';:';., . ---;'_\.
2. Location of proposed structure on lot. ~j;/ j,,;:., '7[',:,,; '~:_\
3. Dimensions oi front and side set-backs. :'S 'c',- ,r 4,;0 '. l"-.,~
:-">l II y o,~ "''''',' C..:::Jj
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.-~ .-,_, ~!',.Lv':t;-I..-r', -1
St-eot n~mes \..,) ';;)li'l..L!,f~#;lf:.":h' ':::i,!::::'
5. .. ~ ""...... , , \ >). .i-;P,l,.:/ . . " ''\:,
6. Location of. adjacent existing buiIdings.\- \" U". S;-"
7. Other inionnation as may be requested. .. ", >-;~2~J.ilP~Y'
Approved ___ Dcnied__._ by the 'PI~:mning Commission on _______.,...___ (date) ,
, )
subiec-: to the ~ollowing conditions: _________.:___________________:-______
Approved ~__ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subiec to, the
'e.,: . following conditions: .:._-:.__....~..:.._______.;.___~______:.:_'__________:.._______
.. t -.
. ,
------------------------------------------------------------------
. '!..
..0 .. . ..
... , : .. ~ Comments: (U~~' other side). ':~'>:::';." .. '.
- . . .".. '.' -. ". ~. ....... . .....~ .. ...
.. ".' .". -:.: ....:.::-:- .:. ..:-.~~,.: :~. .._-~-.., ". :." -.:: ~.~ ,:.~ .. :'. .
~ '. ~ .:
. '
... ,....
,. " .
.. ", .
.....
.... ~
, '
-. .. ...-.. ..
-..... ..
.. .: o. ."
.. ..'
.. . .. .. ." .
,~
. . ..... 0...
. '. .
. . ".... .
....: ".
'. ....
. .........
". .... .:......$.. .", ,"
. - .':.:'.~' .:..0 .-:"
::.. . . .. ..' '.~~ .:'/:: "i~. .. ,::.'
e
. .~ -. '\.. I
'.
,..",. ~ ." .. . .'. .. .."....... ..,~. ,. .",'*' . ,'lI, , -.,-.., -' .,...(j
~,:~;,J,. 7.\ ::,s. ~,:; _: ,'~' eFt '.:::::j, ,;;:i;' .':~" '11.' : ,;:':.:: ';[:,;; :>Ji::;;1
...._ ,.._ ,.. ,.'..'..' .'. .....,......:...."..<:t;r... . c.....,. -c'
1,~~~r~i : ," ;'.;' ,,~~., .".. .,;'.:.~ .,; ,...,'..;.,.:f. ..;;:~::2: . ,::,,;;;~,S~,~:.' .' .::.-'_,;;:'.~\.:? ,':.., "..',:..... .,.':,... . ;~:.....;...~, .'~"'.. ".."~.' .".' .:,
..'.. i
. ' ";:;~~;1~ :~
~:.::-;':r '.-:.:"i
.';..... '.: :'.:r:i::.
cJ
;:,
(ft
-u
r
]>
.C-
,
e
;'-.
" ;
..,
'.-.~..
. ../'<
....t..;.
,.' {,
:i~'
..,,,,:'
~~~..
(.. :
. ,.
.~. I.
,..;;..'
'"
:. ~"v,t:,..
. .
::...;~,:'~ (
e
... ~ '"
;'1:> .. ..'-~.;:
~.~,1f~:~~~&j~~::'
..,-\...~ ~.....,
'... (~tt~,:
~"'~t;"
~ :~9fti.' ,;"
:.)t:':. .',~ ,~~f..:.'-i
";,:,...t:-;:t.
....<.
, .
."'..~' ..,',." .. . ...,.;:.. ."".:,.,'. ' ,. . :.~ .'
\ _ J:.J;~.~: ~~: ,:-,
j' .:;:;:,fJ;;;f:\;fJt~ ;'>:.";;'":0 (i",;;~';i~.~~~i~;~~:::~;~;C ?2~iJ1
. . ...",' " ;-,' ";~,"i,::",: ~'i~i',~i:~);;t;%i~;~:'I~~;;;:;:1;~:~;~i~L:,~~;~(t]JJ i
~.., ",." '. ..",", ,. , , "<-.,,,. ,. .'..'~.. ,.,.. '.."'" ~ ., ..'.0 'i;;.;;. "'~.... .,...., .. .'", '''.,~
~:i.:~~;\">~,,';.~t~:;l{~~;~::;;;\~'.:"".; }:':.:);~; ,,~~~m~lDf~~' i:)S;'tC~':A\':~i,
1", , ..... ... -4.. ..,., ..,.. "'''". . ,'...".,.,'.. '.., .,.., _.., .' '.'. .:it'Ct ',..... ....", '''''''I
.-.." ~,
. . ~ '. .i
,,:''(,:';If.. ~:"....
. oT ..,.....
. ..;:f,:W,;{t:[i-\JJ
. .....
.,' ,."..' ','or..,
. . ,. ';::;.
~: .... ~~~< ~': _'.':~:~~:.' ....~~.. _
'.
:. .:~ .
........
" '\.
, t.,
"i/t-..
. .:: ';.,":,: ...>:~.
W ..,".,.: .
~~ ca ,.', ,":: ,">,,~'
~ ~.,. 6.. ',"~ . ,... ,.':t.
".', /:<~~.
' , .:~:~~th
' . .ifJt~
' ,. .:', " , .:'~
'S;;;':.. , .,. '.... /\:l
;~~.:'::.. .....?:~: ...',... ",_::,'~'I :.-,.,. ";:'./.~,J.,:'.':.:..,.:7,i.~..~;,;
'r.. ...:.'.::::: ~..:i':> <>!. "':,, . "iiJ
,i",,;;.ti F::'.'1i \' ~:~;~~t~
c"'::1' '." .5 ",.. . ..: ... :",'.'~
,,:, .;" ... :.: ; (r,"". ... , . . _ .'J
,,~>;, ", \"" .'. , ... ~ ::L\;~~ .
.: ::".:;~',;.\'<<:;H':'~ . - 1\(_..",'..,' ::' (e.''-';'' .:.-:"'. :: ~
.;.~.....:..:...;,. ,
'. .~??
' ,~' " ,.', :. .,.. '::~;; N '.'-:':' ,.,
" ;~t;;hf;;~~:<:\::, ~J'~~f'
,. .,,~' ". ,.".,., ',. J.' . " d'~
: ')):":;':: ' . " h.; :;, 11,;~ ~~ }i'"\~;,(:.,:'f' '7 t:~r,~
'.. ,.,. .! ", "". t" L W:. ,.. '", , .......>' " ., ."..;."<'"" .." ' " .."., t. .;Z2:;~
. , ,,' '.'. <' Q, . ';~.,... ',.'.;'.... ~.".' ...., ._.: '.,.,:.. ~.,.. '.:';.,'.' '.' '.~'.J'.. .:"t .,..'".~...;..: .:'.,.'.,,:...':..;. ':. .,~.'..-... ., ....',.. '. - ~.,_.::.';..
':.,:, '-,~ "~.,. ...... ...., i,~,~ :.. ::.. :,....; i, .;,',. ;., ., ::..', ',. '. :.. ., .:; ';,.;. .....:.: ::_ ~,;'. ... :... ;,.. '..,:. ".'. '..'.~, :. ';..,._ ;'.. ';,. " .~"
~,. .: 1 ' .~
;i;;~'};::;;'y;:~ .:7~;:j ~~i~~~;i:;;'~'~};'.:/;.;:: ,. , .;:' " ,'.' ~.: ~~:
""C:. .,;. .:.,): .. ..". 4. . ' ... ' .. '; t '.".. .. '. .'... ..:.r.:.~.,.''''.'.f........,;..:.:;:..:..r,.~,.".'.~,
' " . , "1 :~i':":::.,~ r-,}C"~',:,
\~.;:....:.;~,.,./~.:~,..~,. ':,'. .',' ',:...:. ~7.,.,,'... : '" ,.".
," :: '1>'<> - .. '. '.:.~."~' ::.: H -'. :;,:..:.::;,'r,.~.'.;;:,
;};~~2:t.\,;, :. . '
."="1~', ,,>;
;'.''iIl'<:lif', -"
. ~~W,r.. f1t...~.~i:
""", ...... , .
,,' ,> '. t.~~..~..~,~:~,., ..
.;';):1.:.;,:..-'.::..:.... ,
: . .':.:'t"
.~.>-~~ ,.~:. '/':'.~::/,:-:~:".
...:~..;. '7>-:' ~~~~,:~~:,,:
j,:
.. :.-. ~:'
.' .....
:;~:'\~':~.
~::;~~{
. ",'
.....-:"
:,:.~~:
.'
~) ~~~~.:-:
"'..
.'.....
.t '.~
~t.
..
........ ....
'. .. ',..,.
.:
. to..
.... . J."~. .
, ..
.: I
'..
...........
;.
;":'. ....
"':.:'::.a'
;. ~.
'.::'.: '~'.;:.~..
.:r;.....
'/'1'.
;,",' .
..\ .:'. '. ... ..,~io. .
'tt~..),.. .'
..:"'i';;{tlf
'.;'"
''.,'.
1" '.
~,'. '. '. i~'
':;::";
..? ~;.
..'
t.;
6. '
: ..
~,
,.,.
i:&.~:} ~ :
~j'~1 .
~ ~ .~~'i',
1.~"A.~.
~~~\,;,#
) '~
","':':':'-";:" . ~~-':"".'-':::-~"'.'" ':'.~~':". ~:,--:"':.">~~:~~';-..I':-~~."::: .;~~.<>\.: '... ,..... ......' ....,.. ~",... .. ... '"
.'. . ;.', , ::'.' < :. ' ,:: ',.:' .':.. ::...',.: .' ,... :,.,.':..::'/.:.:,>;::~:..>:,:.::.i:..~/:~:};;~'~:~?:~~~y\(.
'. .,.~'.: ..' . .' : .' . . _ ........,. ~. . .' . '. . '. ..... ., '..' . ' J<'.' . . .' ., \ . '. ' '. .
" ,,':':: ','.<..' '" ',';:~.;,::' "-:,::~,:"...", :'.'. ~.:,:..'.:....:',.~:,:." ....:...~,....;':::. ,', ':'.'.. <'::...,...>,:.::...;.,_:.:..,..'~:.<., .. ,...;'.'::.;:~:i~.~:~\?:,.;~.:.:
" ,." .-.'
. '.., . ..
.' ,'. .:'.',J _..",
, . '.
. -,,'.." '. ,;', . : ," . . '.
'. ,,'. . .' H'" " ... .. .. ", .:' ,...:' .' ..... " .... ,.'.. ~ . ~. "
'. '. .'. :.,.
. :'..'. ' .' . . . :
...' .,' ...
...' . .' '."
, . . . ' ., ~..".
*. ...'.
., '~:,
. ',' . ..
. .' , . .
',... -': ','. .
.' ..,....
. " -
, ,.
..
~ ,,' . . '. .."
- .. .. '.
J ._
e
I
I
i
j .
. ,
I
" -, ,'.,;. "
, ." '''-, ',' ~.
I. .:..::. '. ...' '.'.... ,. . :::
. '. . ~.
e".:. ..'.
" ..
. '
~ #39-32tJ 1
I -
;
,.
\
. '.
" ' .
..
~
e
~
~
, .
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. Vj90-14
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: 201 North Second Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: George Spevack, Opus Corporation for West Publishing
Company, Applicant.
Type of Application: Variance
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Variance to the Parking Ordinance for a 6,482 square foot office building at
201 North Second Street.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to use the Old Conn-Co shoe store for a 6,482 square foot
office building. According to City parking regulations, the parking demand for
this use is thirty two spaces. The site plan shows a parking lot that can
accommodate twelve cars which leaves the need for twenty additional spaces.
The parking lot across the street has approximately thirty five public spaces.
Other uses in the area do not provide adequate on-site parking and use the
adjacent streets or public parking lots.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All employees shall park on site, North of Mulberry on Second Street or
in other designated employee parking areas.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
The granting of this variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the
building and that this is the minimum variance that will accomplish such
purpose. '
ATTACHMENTS:
- Building Plan.
- Site Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned.
'AC,loa, ..
e
Case Number E{CJ9..€.::l!L
Fee Paid ___~!...~~
Date Filed ___~!!:-ji.rL____
,PLANNING ADlv\INISTRATIVE FORN\
Street Location or Property: '_.2:.~_L_1l~--~~~--fS:tL--JS+~lJ-~_g,*e0
L 1 D" .~. t. Pro erty' 6 cc C,\ -t-+Clche.d
ega ascnp lion 01 p . ----------------------------------------
Owner: Na~e ___~\.L~J?:t.__r?_f.~bJ_~~_hJ~tr_-~-Q~--~~~~--~~-~-u V\'
S () We S :+- IL.'C- II c s :) . _,
Address ____6...:b_J?~16..,I-_____~L<L.y__ Phone: 2A~___~f;iQ_Q_
Ap'plicant (if other than oWJ1er): Name _1AL~S...:.:t.__O_~_k?_1~.$~111.Y.1:o--~-~ \1\." V\. Rc I.V q VI
Address ______________________________ Phone: Z~?~__~...g.L)__ '
Type of Request:.
___ Rezoning
___ Special Use Permit
___ Variance
___ Approval or Preliminary Plat
___ Approval of ~inal. Plat
~_ Other _e.q,tk~A~-:. {Lc:;.Y_L C LI.J
Description or Request: __________________'____________________________
~
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Signature of Applicant: ~_~~
Date of Public Hearing: ___jy~~iL5~.l~__1b___________________~__..:.~___
NOTE; Sketch of proposed 'property and structure to be dra"i'ro 1n 'back oi t.'ris :torm or at.
tached, showing the following:
1. North direction.
2. Loca.tion of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dimensions of front and side set-backs.
4. Dimensions of proposed structure.
S. Street names.
6. Location of adjacent existing buildings.
7. Other iniormation as may be requested.
Approved ___ Denied ___ by tho "Planning Commission on ___________ (date)
subiec-:- to the following conditions: ____________________________________
----------------------------~-------------------------------------
~ Approved ___ Denied ___ by the Council on ________________ subiec: to the
.l II' d'"
10 oWing con lilons: ________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: (Use' other side)
__ I I I I II I I I 1_
"
e
,
,
,
l!
0:
,.
..
~
.
e
I
~~
"
1
i
~
I
IlOIlTM aEC_ a_
""'Ito&A1"r ~ "'"
--'-
- - - 1
..
o.
~.
...
;'J
;11
'~I
~I
Ii I
- l
. . II .
I
i
0 I fTTl
..
. I
. Ojl ...
,'. ,
I' '. 'I -- 51 l
E~~\~~-J-
I UlanMG --- I
I
...
I
-... - WEST PUBLISHING
201.N 2nd..8T1UWATal
- ~ofl, l'\."'"
.-. ........
~., 0.....,
- -
,. ,.to
-
_n..
. OPUS CORPORAnOll
111_ ' UllIIlS ' llMUlI'IIIS
_ a... c.. _.......... ........ --... ....
..."'-
.
~.'."I
--- ~....
i
!
,
~
e
, I,
~
I
f
(
!
I
r= I
I.
HI
.11
.
.!/
~ I
II
, .
e
s
. II".
i ..1.-4
..:I"i..
_!torose:
.....-:.~
";0 z. f.
:Ii~p
.lt~ -n
~ I I
. II'
.. 4\.
..
.
-
I====:l
------------------------ ~
------ · -------'fJLl
------------------------- ~::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::
I!l '
i
I
1--.... I;
----..1 r-- f'_"
.;t"s.~~ '
-ll'-r I,.. '
-----.,---_ IfI.... ~
:;
"
I
I
-1
I :1
I
I I
r I
I
I
I I
I
~
I.
i
I
j .,
1 ~ !
.....,.. :.
:1
I,
11
i
,
(/)
c:: ()
'" l>
,. . I
~ r
z !":' 1
C)
Z ~
9 ......... j
., ~
0 .
9 II ' .
'-' ~ ;
0 . ,
9 I
0,
lj
/, '
I'
, i
~ i
~ I
.. .
~ ~
i ..
...
.'
0
~
,.
'"
'"
...
'"
-<
>
'"
,..,
'"
:F=OC===============~==.=======~:=====:===~=;l
.,
.,
,.
.,
)
~
I
!
o~
" "
+z
-''''
nC'>
,..,,..,
'"
VI
'"
,..,
,.n
"',..,
,..,,,
,.....
i5
z
~ ~
...
CD
~
,.
'"
.,
o
o
, ~
I
I
e
e
e
.,.
.....
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-15
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: 826 South Fourth St.
Comprehensive Plan District: General Commercial
Zoning District: CA
Applicant's Name: Donald and Lorry Istel
Type of Application: Variance (Parking Ordinance)
Project Description:
Variance to the Parking Ordinance for a takeout/eat in restaurant business at
826 South Fourth Street (Old Culligan Office Building).
DISCUSSION:
The request is to expand the use of a take out restaurant to a take out/sit
down restaurant with seating for 20-24 customers. The parking demand for this
use is seven spaces. This is two spaces more than the previous office use
demand. The existing site cannot accommodate this parking demand. According to
the applicant, most cooks and managers park in the lot behind the building
(next to Classic Care). Delivery cars park in front of the business at the ten
minute loading zone.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. All restaurant employees shall park in the lot located behind the
building.
RECOMMENDATION:
FINDINGS:
Due to the existing conditions, the parking demand for the use cannot be met.
Therefore, granting this variance to the Parking Ordinance is necessary for
the reasonable use of the building.
ATTACHMENTS: Site plan.
\
...
...
\ ~
\ . ~
. ~
~
~
--....
-......J
~
~
-J
__~<(9t(L \
\~
If fA . sf
\
\
-
~
\
\
,
,
"
\
,
\
\
.
\
\
1
~
1 '[ Me[A -8-. ....
Kr\dIe~ 3 qo
C ()r~.f R- LA .
\J . 49J -::;i-I .
~
1)
f! 'f-l 0
{ \.
e
e
e
,
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. V/90-16
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: Off of Third Street, South of Hazel (South of City park)
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicantls Names: Don Baker, Joe Gould & Steve Erban
Type of Application: Variance (Street access)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The request lS a variance to the City requirements that developable lots have
access to an improved public street.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal is to use an unimproved gravel and dirt road over road right of
way and City park property for access to a single family lot. The access road
begins at the intersection of Hazel and Third Street, then proceeds to the
south outside of the right of way connecting to Second Street north of vacated
Willow Street (see location map). Besides Lot 5, there are two other vacant
lots in the area that may be interested in gaining access off of the
unimproved road. The road is located at the base of a hill that slopes up to
the southwest.
The applicant has submitted a site plan that shows the location of the
structure consistent with City setback requirements. No city services, water
or sewer are available to the site. The site, all of Lot 5 and 1/2 of Lot 2,
contains 20,025 square feet. A 2,700 square foot sewage drainfield is located
in front of the structure. Access to the residence is provided over a long
300+ foot driveway. A portion of the driveway is over Third Street right of
way and park property to connect to the access road. The City currently does
not regularly maintain or plow the road.
This decision can set a pattern for other similar situations in the City. The
unimproved road will become a City maintenance responsibility once residences
are constructed using it for an access. Because of that, it is recommended
that the road be brought up to a minimal City standard before use of the road
is granted.
The lot is not serviced by City water or sewer service so documentation that
the lot can accommodate the on-site systems is required before building
permits can be issued. A drainage plan for the driveway should be provided to
make sure the site runoff can be accommodated with the existing facilities.
The project impacts the park so the proposal has been referred to the Park
Commission for review and comment.
~-y
e
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A portion of the unimproved access road shall be paved to City
standards (20' to 241 width) for such low use roads including any
needed drainage improvement and paid for by the applicant (Development
Agreement).
2. Documentation by a qualified professional that the site is suitable for
an on-site sewer system and on-site water system shall be provided
before building permits are issued.
3. The applicant shall obtain requested well drilling permit.
4. The applicant shall receive a revocable permit to use City park
property for access from the driveway to the access road.
5. The City shall maintain the access road only and the driveway over
public property shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
e
ATTACHMENTS:
- Letter of Application, March 2, 1990
- Site Plan
- Certificate of Survey.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
e
. =J ~":;~J 1
rrm..lIl1r.......;J-- _ ~.. , ~ ' .
rivt1'.6"~~~ -:,--~ ~----~:-: lOER SLV~! ~ ~/
I t 6 I' 6 f I 0 . 6 , 1 3 >-' ~ I
/ ~ ~ ~ 56 5~ ,,,54 1:5 ~ - w 52 -
'" ~ll""'>r-;-'.I' '"N..~~: I~~ rl'-;3_'
S T rl I,..."~ JA~ ~ ia:~\..?}Ib 0 48 la:' g 2' I
" R' ! * :~rL~/ I~F;:' 4'~ ~I .o-T-;- u: 4 j"'~-~ r--:t: ;..
, - - _ILL /' ~J1 "'1 '~,&.
_ - E. V~V' wr ....~.. STo : I
- - - l! I ~ ,. \ e 5/
, .. " I _ '~_ 0 _ __ 6.J _ '._ '_ ~ II ,\..\J /
..---- Z 45 J 44 Z 43 z 42 ',j
~ -: f --; ,- r 4 r 3 - ~ -T -;- 4 3 tI\ \ ~ ,
-- -->:- -.:::. ' ST.. L-, I !!.. \ \-=-
e . 0'1"; ~1-Lri-:L, ',"; \\ .
. C ' ~III"'"---' ~I-
I! . , I ,
, i:.
...,. . l.J.L../ ~~I~ ' ",
II,: ~ ~~ :L.-= ~\ .
'r-~ 'T-; - :/;'1. ; - : :\ .
L.__ _;...___ I , ..,
=_ --r -_: 1-4:1 H ,/0 L~TI U "-1
.. '3~'~'- ~ ~-~0"1 \ .
--, T~- :, ~,j, I ! ,
6 I I a I 1 /d I ·
5T. - 2~---V~~-- .
1 ! II I ' :;;1" r .-(I)~ ~ ,- ., I ~.
+ t..- / HI''''' r: ~YI ~Mllj:)F" RI\I - J I ~
, , II i Iv I I ~;ll ~ P
II I r- ~ I I- 6 : ' I I · '(I) I ~
I _ __~__ - _ --~ ~
S 20 Vl 2/ .. 22 23 ' . ;tl
I !! - '-1-----
I ! i I 4 , 4 I 3 ~l 4 J 4 3 .
t l~ '0\ - 4 E..:.ir~!fl i\
4 l1vE ! I x ~ · I. ,~ I ~~- ~-J ~t~. 1.' 1~--0 ...
mrrrrrrmm. I~ /9 ~ /8 0 17 ~ /6 ~ --t"- ' '.
. I I I ,1;-"'-' -I--J:-~-<J --'To- - --. ro -r \ '1\0
i : co I I, IlL: 4 I , ~ 4 I 3 ~I" ! LL." 3 _ ---l-f1!,
~
:.t I
I
...:=..
. ....
';"~-:-:- .~-,:;
- .,,~".:
--
-
,:
~.
: L 'J B
. ". ......... - . .
,C 100
e
Case Number y./~g.:_~~__
~~
Fee Paid _______________
Da~e Filed _3J3.jfg_______
PLANNING ADAtdN!STRATIVE FORJv\
St;-eer Location or Property:
Third Street, Stil~water, Mi~nesota
----------------------~-------------------
L~ I 0 ;,- .~. ~ P ~ . S 1/2 Lot 2 & Lot 5, Block 46, Carli Schulenberg Addition
\::9a O_l.,.npllon o. rcper.y. ________________________________________
Own e r: N a m e ~~::_~a_k~.: !._~t...e!~_~~~a~2_,~~:._9.:>~~~__________________ ______
Address ~.:._~._.E~~_~lJ_____I:..a~~_~~~l._~~___ Phone: ~l~:.~~~6________
Applicant (if other than c'.','J1er): Name ___~~.=___________________________
Address___!!~:_______________________ Pnone:~:~:___________
Type
of Recuest:-
.
Rezoning
___ Approval oT Preliminc.Jry Plat
___ Approval of ~inal, Plat
___ Other ____________. ._..;..____
Soecial Use Permit
.
.A._ Yadancs
Desc:;p~lon of Request: __T-9_~~:._~ni~.E~~':.~_!~~:.?_~!:.:.:..t_~~~:.~_i_s_!~;..~t.:~m..P.:~_:ed road to
e j;~!:;, _a~.!:~ ~ ~ J: 2_ ~ ~ ~.Pl!!. !.c!.i_n~_ ~ it. ~_L~ ~!: _ ~ ~t 1l~ ~ ~c!..l~.!! ~~t._ __ _ _ _ ________ _ _ __
Sianature OT Apolica -.
- .
n 'back of t..'ili ior:::. 0-: a.t-
Don
Dat2 of Public Hearing: ________________________
NOT::::: Sketch of proposed 'proper:y ar:.d stru.ctu-:e
.. . ... . . .\... ..... .
..:icneo, snowmg ...e :;:ollowmg:
1. North cii:::-ection.
2. Loc;;, tion of proposed structure on lot.
3. Dirr.er:.s:ons oi front :3..J."'1d side set-bacl.-:s.
4. Dime~sior:s of proposed st;.-ucture.
5. S t:-eet ::a~es.
6. Loc;;"icn of ::.djacent existing buildings.
7. Ot~.i.e:r ixo4:":'.ation. as ma)<r be requested.
,\\\,-\~ ~47Si5j:_"
~ ;J.1 //;\
0) ~ ;-i"~~\
,.::: go~~z c,~
<.0 .A. ~:( F s, ~ Cj\
U) '""'f" ~ Q.. ~ ;'.1 .,," . .-1;
\:'i _..~. oi-
\:.-~ >- "./)
\;.'t:
f)
App;-cvcd ___ Denied ___ by the 'Planning Commission on ___________ (dafer-
suSiec-:- to the following conditions:
e ApprcY2d --- Denied --- by the Council on -----___________ subiec to t;...e
fol;owir.g conci-;;ons:
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
Cc;-:-.:-:-.err;s: (Use ot~€:r :;;ce)
e
e
e
In
eo
....
Ceo
In
l'l
N
<(
I">
o
eo
I">
I">
~
CTR SEC 21-30-20
STONE
CERTIFICATE
OF SURVEY
THE SOUTH HALF (S 1/2) OF LOT TWO (2),
AND ALL OF LOTS FOUR (4), FIVE (5), AND
SIX (6), BLOCK FORTY-SIX (46), CARLI AND
SCHULENBURGS ADDITION TO STILLWATER,
MINNESOTA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
ON FILE AND OF RECORD.'IN THE OFFICE OF
THE REGISTER OF DEEDS, WASHINGTON COUNTY
MINNESOTA. '
SURVEY FOR DON BAKER AND JOE GOULD
ST 0 STONE
149.80
1
BL OCK,
Li6
0
In
60.00
In N
- N
co 0
.... 0
"co -
In
l'l
N
<(
149.60
N l'l
- -
0 eo N 1/2 LOT 2 0
In In
.eo
....
eo, 149.80
In l'l
N l'l -
- 0
0 N 5 1/2 LOT 2
<( In
In
149.80
.... '"
N N
0 3 0
0 0
- -
5
l-
ll)
149.80
:r:
I-
0:::
::J
o
LL
N
N
o
o
Lj
149.19 149.79
0 0 AZ 269.21' 12"
0 VAC1~9.19 0
0 0
l'l l'l WILLOW 5T
AZ 269" 21' 12"
60.00
e DENOTES IRON PIPE RLS 13774 FOUND
. DENOTES 1/2" IRON PIPE SET
'\
\
\
--
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
'.D
N
o
o
-
\
\
\
\
\
\
'>,1
\T
\ \
\ \
,.,..
\
N
N
'co
....
.
eo
In
l'l
N---
-<(
-'- _/
- - - - -, \
\
\
---
l-
ll)
o
0:::
I--l
:r:
I-
I hereb" certify that this survey, p!;;n, or
rcpc.rt {v,,$ prc:pared by me or uncz, ,;,:'i
d:; r:.:ct ~~l!pCI V!SiC.ii ~Ind 1ti:~~ ! Jrl1 U U :y
('::;r.:i:;t..~;!~d 1-..1flii Survl:yor ur;ti~i tile !:.\"i:-;
oi~',i:: :;;'is.C of Mlftn~
__{da,;J2]::L ..r:&k~k-^-
. /, 11752
u~tcJElLZ/'i{ i..__Re;::. No.__
SCALE l' .;.. 50 I
Rul' , Vl?liI&"'AI' @,u ;J/t!'14 7),{
e
Ma rch 2, 1990
Don Baker
P. O. Box 219
Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042
City Council
City of Stillwater
Stillwater City Hall
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Council Members:
We are requesting a variance from the city requirement that access to the
property be over an improved public road for the following piece of property.
South Half of Lot 2, and Lot 5, Block 46, of the Carli Schulenbugs
Addition to Stillwater, Minnesota.
e
We propose to gain access to the building site over "unimproved" Third Street,
off of Hazel Street, and over the South 1/2 of Lot 2 which does not contain
enough area to be considered as a buildable lot, and because the building site on
Lot 5 is not accessible off of Fourth Street from the West due to severe
elevation changes.
We propose that the access would be used as an unimproved road, and would be
maintained by the persons building on the property. Lot 2 is to be used for a
driveway to gain access to the building site on Lot 5.
The unimproved road and driveway would be surfaced with lime rock, and
drainage would remain overland.
The Public Works Department has indicated that there are no plans to improve
Third Street, and that they did not see drainage as being a problem.
At this time Third Street is an unimproved lime rock road, which loops around
the West and South sides of the park, and ties Hazel Street into Second Street.
It seems impractical to improve Third Street, because it would encourage
additional traffic through the park.
We have a buyer for this property, but the sale is contingent upon gaining this
variance. If there are any questions, please contact me at 439-8886.
e
~
~
~
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. PUD/88-68 & 71 (MODIFICATION)
Planning Commission Meeting: Marcil 12, 1990
Project Location: 14900 North 61st Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Washington County Office Building
Zoning District: RA/PUD
Applicantls Name: Washington County
Type of Application: Final PUD
BACKGROUND:
On December 6, 1988 the City Council approved a Planned Unit Development
request for a three story addition to the south wing of the County Government
Center and adjacent parking lot on the east side of Panama (Staff reports and
PUD permits attached). At that time County representatives indicated that the
parking lot was a temporary solution to the need for parking and that they may
return with a new parking arrangement as master planning for the Government
Center develops.
The request before the City is a modification of the previously approved PUD
approval for the surface parking lot, replacing it with a three level parking
structure located southeast of the 62 St. North/Panama Avenue intersection.
The plans show a 74 stall first level, a 272 stall second level and a 195
stall third level for a total of 541 stalls. Some of the stalls would be used
by law enforcement personnel for vehicle storage.
As shown on the plans, the parking structure is located across Panama (east)
from the existing County Government Center. Three houses located along.62nd
Street North would be removed. The top deck level of the proposed structure
would be at an elevation of 886. The elevation of the intersection is 890, so
the structure from that vantage point will appear as a surface deck. The
parking deck is setback 60 ft. from 62nd Street North and Panama and over 100
ft. from the backs of property along Paris Avenue North. A residence not
within the Government Center boundaries located along 62nd Street North is 20
ft. from the proposed structure. At that point, the structure is setback less
than ten feet from the property line. Special screening and buffering should
be provided to minimize the impact on the residence. Besides the perimeter
landscaping, the plan shows landscaping on the top level of the parking
structure.
Access to the parking ramp is provided off of Panama. This could be
accommodated from existing Panama Avenue North. However, vacation of Panama
should be considered with review of the master plan for the site.
No lighting or signage plan for the parking area has been provided. Also, a
parking management plan showing who will use what parking and how visitors or
employees will get from their parked vehicles to the department or desired
county service. This may require the construction of some sidewalks or
pedestrian ways.
~
The proposed parking ramp will not cover as much land as the original surface
parking plan. This will reduce the amount of runoff from the previous plan. A
detailed grading/drainage plan with erosion control measures should be
provided before construction begins.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval of modification with conditions.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The following detailed plans shall be provided for City review and
approval before building permits for the ramp are issued.
A. A detailed screening/buffer plan minimizing the impact of the
parking ramp on the single family residence located on 62nd
Street North, Paris Avenue North and Upper Street and all other
residential areas impacted by the parking ramp. (This could
include berming, trees, and shrubs to soften the view of the
Government Center from the residential area.)
B. A detailed grading /drainage plan including erosion control
measures and reestablishment of disturbed areas,
C. A parking and pedestrian lighting plan,
~ D. And a parking management and signage plan.
2. Perimeter ramp landscaping to the north, east and west shall be planted
with completion and use of the ramp.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
~
I' AC 100
~ -
,.....-l. ' ',.;," .-.,~.::.. 0""
... ''71IJ"?\/(J/)_'' ..
Case Number --:r!i~fl!..-j~- .....: ,':'.:'
Fee Paid ~~~_~_~___
. .#/ 1 ~
Date File~ -ldf-XC2----
PLANNING ADlv\INISTRATIVE FOR1\r\ ~.&.\ ~~~~': .
, .
A:'
.
Street Location of Property:
14900 61st St North
------------------------------------------
'.
1 D. .. f P See attached
Lega ascription 0 roperty; ________________________________________
Own er: N a me _..w22~~n_gJ:~!!_~~u!1.!X____:':.------------ _________________~__
14900 61s~ St North 779~5194
Address ______________________________ Phone: _______________
Ap'plicant (if other than oW]1er): Name _______________.:.____"_-:-_.__________
. . "
Address__________~___________________ Pho~e:-------~~------
Type of Request:.
___ Rezoning
___ Special Use Permit
___ Variance
,___ Approval ~of Preliminary Plat
__..: Approval of f.inal Plat
:1_ Other_~~~~~~~~~~n}_~~~~__
.. Description of Req~est: _J.b~_p.~rj<j.'].9_~C2.lT!P.9!!~~t.E.f_!'2.~!~~_!.~~;~~-~u..r.:.:~!---
Government Center expansion has .been modified 'to reflect the' schematic design
e'
-------------------------------~----------------------------------
. .*.
for the.' proposed' Law Enfor~ement Center and future Courts e~Dansion a~ well as
. ~-~~;t-e~-~it-e-~l;n-ni~;-in~ti;ti~-t~-d;;el~p-~;ng~~:-~~1~Xi-90~ s-tosi~. -~-eeds " '
Signature of Applicant: ....~. ______ _ _ ___
. .
. .
Dote Of Publ'lc Hear'lng'. . '
. ---------------------------------------------
'NOTE: ~k~tc~ of pr?posed 'propert!' ~nd structure to be dra~.on back Ot<'S~l'~.
tac~ea, showmg the. foll.owmg. ,'" .:' . .' ('oc{;~":' ..~,' ~
1. North. dlrectlon. ' ,,~~. ',~ ~~. '~?\ "
2. L~catlo,?- of proposed stru~ture on lot., ~_< ... 6:) 9 :;-J /;g ,.~::,
3. DlmenslOns of front and slde set-backs. ':J~';; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
4. Dimensions of proposed structure. < 'f:t: ('!.. ~ if ~ ..:;: " .
5. Street names. \~-::' E ~ ,;.
6. Locatio.n .of adj,acent existing bui1din..gs.\~,', a-(..,\,,;::<
7. Other lIuonnation as may be reques~ed. '~.&dJl!8tt~'-1\'
Approved ___ Denied '__._ by tho 'Pl~nning Commission on ___~_______ (dote)
subiect to the ~ollowing conditions: _________..:___________________'_______
, )
------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved ~__ Denied ___ by the Council on ______________~- subiect to the
. -- " : ~ 11' d' . \ . ,.
, '" I 0 oWing con ltlons: .:._-:.__...______________________~___________________
, , . .
" .
, ,
------------------------------------------------------------------
.. . ." .'
,~Comments: (U~e other side), .~'~: <::'- .'.
. ~ .... ' '.':: . . '"
. .': .,., .. '.~ ,: ,.:,,~..::: ,:; ;;:::~' \'.? . :.' '", ::, .:. .. Co
"
I' .:' .
.. '. .
"
'., :: ~'.. .
.: .
. ,.., . .
" . : .. '~". . .~. ..
" '.' . .
.... - .
. ....:. .:"; ........ ~: .' -'.
. .; ..
.1 ." .;' .
c~~.
cj
~
.'
\l
NO. SUP/88-68
e
CITY OF STILLWATER
Permit Fee $50.00
Date Fee Paid ~~IJ''i
, I
ZONING USE PERMIT
I I Certificate of Compl i ance n Rezoning
IX! Special Use Perm it n Variance
I I Planned Unit Development I I Grading
n Sign
I I
I I
Condit i ona 1 Use
Amended
Applicant: Washington County Government Center
Address: 14900 North 61st Street
City/State/Zip Code: Stillwater, MN 55082
Property Description: Block 1 and 4; Lots 1-10; Block 5; North 20' Lots 21-30
Block 5; McMillan and Cooley's Addition to Stillwater.
Zone District:
RA
e Permitted Uses: 308 car parking lot.
Subject to the following special conditions
e
1. The parking lot landscape plan shall be revised to include the following
elements as approved by the Community Development Director:
- Provide in lot landscaping similar to the west parking lot.
- Contain car headlights on site through berming, lot excavation, low
fencing (three foot maximum) or landscaping.
- The parking lot shall be setback twenty feet from the Panama front
property line.
- Additonal landscape screening shall be provided along the south and
north boundaries of the lot. (If the residence to the north is removed
and existing trees remain, no additional landscaping is necessary except
for headlight screening.
2. A sidewalk shall be constructed along Panama Avenue in front of the
par kin g lot.
3. The parking lot light standards shall be reduced to twenty f~ Iitn ~eW!h!.\Vl ~ ~\
4. Parking lot construction shall meet City standards for surfa 'J g~a~ lJ
curbing. I
5. Parking lot construction and landscaping shall be completed ~ oreJAN 31989
administrative building occupancy.
6. The recommendations from the City Engineer dated November 1, ~i3'8'\~7QU')LLER
regarding drainage shall be incorporated in the final drainage p~r, i .1
We accept the con . ions of this permit. We understand that any changes from
. t~ plans 7t resubmitted for pprov~l. _ /J _ . .
b/~.' I ;~. -~J--1-W
Owner or Representative Date C munity D~velopment Date.
~ Director
(:
r.:,
\..', .
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
~ CASE NO. SUP/88-68
Planning Commission Meeting: November 14, 1988
Project Location: East of County Government Center between Panama and Paris
Avenues.
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicantls Name: Washington County
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description:
Special Use Permit for a 308 car parking lot in Single Family Residential
District.
e
Discussion:
The appl ication is for a 308 car parking lot on a 2.5" acre site. The lot would
be serviced by two driveways off of Panama Avenue. Besides the lot, two
sidewalk areas are shown connecting the parking lot to the Government Center
entrance. The lot is lit by nine 30 ft. light standards. Landscaping is shown
on the Panama Avenue and southern boundary of the site.
Analysis
The parking lot is a very efficient design maximizing the number of spaces on
the 2.5 acre site. Although this lot is most likely employee parking,
additional landscaping similar to the landscaping in the lot west of the
Government Center should be provided. This is particularly important for the
south side ,of the lot, next to the residential area. The parking lot should be
set back twenty feet from the front property line to provide for ingress and
egress from Panama.
It is understood that the residence fo the north of the proposed lot is owned
by the County and will be demolished during further stages of Government
Center expansion. If the residence is not removed and it remains in
residential use, a six foot fence should be constructed separating the parking
lot from the residence. Berming and excavation of the lot or shrubs should be
used to contain the car lights in the lot area. The height of the parking lot
lights should be reduced from the proposed thirty feet to twenty feet to
minimize the impact on surrounding residential areas. To assist parkers in
getting to work, it is suggested a sidewalk be provided on the east side of
Panama in front of the parking lot and that parking be prohibited on both
sides of the street crossing.
Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
e
r
\
(,
e
Conditions of Approval: -
1. The parking lot landscape plan shall be revised to include the following
elements as approved by the Community Development Director.
Provide in lot landscaping similar to the west parking lot.
Contain car headlights on site through berming, lot excavation,
low fencing (three foot maximum) or landscaping.
- The parking lot shall be setback twenty feet from the Panama front
property line.
- Additional landscape screening shall be provided along the south
and north boundaries of the lot. (If the residence to the north is
removed and existing trees remain, no additional landscaping is
necessary except for headlight screening.
2. A sidewalk shall be constructed along Panama Avenue in front of the
parking lot.
3. The parking lot light standards shall be reduced to twenty feet in
height.
4. Parking lot construction shall meet City standards for surfacing and
curbing.
5. Parking lot construction and landscaping shall be completed before
administrative building occupancy.
6. The recommendations from the City Engineer dated November 1, 1988
regarding drainage shall be incorporated in the final drainage plans.
e Findings:
The project, as conditioned, is not injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the general
purpose of this ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Project Plans.
Letter from City Engineer/drainage.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval with conditions.
~
L--....
e
e
~
(~:
fY~
1'7:-'
\~;\,-:..-
't_....~ .
NO. PUD/88-71
CITY OF STILLWATER
Permit Fee $250.00
Date Fee Paid 10/26/88
ZONING USE PERMIT
I I Certificate of Comp 1 i ance I I Rezoning I I Sign
IXl Special Use Permit I I Vari ance I I Condit i ona 1 Use
Amended
n Planned Unit Development I I Grading I I
Appl icant:
Address:
Washington County Government Center
14900 North 61st Street
City/State/Zip Code: Stillwater, MN 55082
Property Description: Block 1 and 4; Lots 1-10, Block 5; North 20' Lots
21-30; Block 5 McMillan and Cooley's Addition.
Zone District:
RA/PUD
Permitted Uses: Three story additon to South wing of Government Center.
Subject to the following special conditions
1. Parking shall be prohibited from the east side of Panama Avenue.
2. This approval is valid only if Case No. SUP/88-68 is approved or
required parking is provided on site before building occupancy.
I
I
I'
,
ti
r
!
:Cj1""Y'Y
e
e
e
"'- l 1
I
~
i
(~
.......--
(-...
. "<.,
.._~...
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. PUO/88-71
Planning Commission Meeting:
November 14, 1988
Project Location: 14900 North 61st Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Washington County Office Building
Zoning District: RA/PUD
Applicantls Name: Washington County
Type of Application: Final PUD
Project Description:
Addition of three stories to existing south wing of County Government Center.
Discussion:
The application is for final PUD approval for a three story addition
containing 61,187 square feet of administrative office space to the existing
southern wing of the Washington County Government Center. This application
should be considered with application Case No. SUP/88-68 for a 308 car parking
lot.
Area Description:
The area around the project site contains a mix of institutional, educational,
multi-family and single family uses. To the west and north along Oxboro and
62nd Street North are multi-family residential and a church, to the east and
south are single family residences and vacant lands. Four streets border the
Government Center site. Oxboro, a forty-five foot wide street, 62nd Street
North, forty-five feet and Panama Avenue North, forty-five feet and Upper
Street twenty-four feet to the south. Access to the site is provided mainly
from Fourth Street to 62nd Street. The topography of the area slopes generally
to the east and south.
Concept PUD Approval
In 1985, the City gave concept approval to a County request to construct the
south wing of the Government Center. At that time, speCific plans were not
submitted but a request was made to allow a three story addition, six stories
total, at sometime in the future. (PUD permit attached) The County has
submitted plans for Final PUD Approval of the three story addition.
Project Description
The proposal is for a 61,187 square foot three story addition to the new
southern portion of the Government Center. (See site plan and building
elevations.) The height of the structure as measured from the parking lot
along Oxboro, west elevation is six levels and eighty feet, including the
mechanical area. The addition would be of the same materials as the existing
building and be an extension of the existing design. No other building changes
are proposed on the building site. The existing service areas will be used for
the addition - water and sewer service are currently provided to the site by
Oak Park Heights. Parking for the building addition is proposed across Panama
Avenue. The parking site has been recently annexed to the City. Because the
site was not in the original PUD application, a separate Special Use Permit is
necessary for the parking (see Case No. SUP/88-68).
.. ~ ' ,.
e
~
e
(,.
~.1-
(~<
, "-
Project Analysis
The project will provide 61~187 square feet of office space. The addition will
increase the activity at the Government Center by adding employees and
visitors or customers. According to figures provided by the County, the
addition will accommodate an addition of 856 to 1,113 employees. 576 are
currently employed at the Center. Existing and proposed employment and visitor
figures were used to estimate the traffic impact on surrounding streets. (See
attached traffic study.) )he figures indicate that the number of trips,
generated by the Government Center as a result of the addition will increase
from 3,000 to 4,350 average annual daily trips, AADT. The distribution of the
trips on the local road system is shown on the traffic flow map. The figures
provided by the County were reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. The figures
appear accurate and can be accommodated on the existing road system (see
attached letter from Short, Elliott and Hendrickson). Even though parking
spaces are vacant and available in the south parking lot, employees are
currently parking along Panama. This situation will increase as a result of
this project. It is suggested that parking be prohibited on the east side of
Panama Avenue as a condition of project approval.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Parking shall be prohibited from the east side of Panama Avenue.
/U &?1yt,;.,t--urj'
2. This approval is valid only if Case No. SUP/88-68 is approved (;"-?- #1/
Recommendation: Approval as conditioned. jJd/L-l'.4-rv!) t~
Findings: ~~f/;pt;;J kfv-
1. The final plans are consistent with the preliminary PUD approval. ~~;~~
2. The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise OlC~~~
detrimental to the public welfare and will be in harmony with the ~' /
general purpose of this ordinance. )/fe.
Attachments:
Project Plan
PUD Concept Approval
Letter from Traffic Engineer
Traffic Report
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Recommended approval with conditions.
STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
e
DATE: MARCH
1 E~,
1990
TIME: 7 PM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gerald Fontaine,
G I enrla Bea I ka
Arl gel a Arid el"~SI:)rl
Jay B. Kimble
Steve Russell,
Cha i l"~man
Wal"~l"~erl Paku I s i
Rc.bb Hamlir.
Community Development Director
tr1EMBERS ABSENT:
Dorl Valsvik
Chairman Fontaine called the meeting to order.
8eeBQ~8b_QE_~I~YIEE
Motion by Judy Curtis, seconded by Angela Anderson to approve the
minutes of the meeting of February 12, 1990.
All in favor, approved.
eY~blg_!::!g8BI~raE
.e
CASE NO. V/90-9-Variance to the sideyard setback requirements for
the conversion of a garage into living space at 406 South Hemlock
Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Virgil
Crowder, Applicant.
Applicant explained the variance request was due to the fact that the
living quarters would be used as a family room. The sideyard
requirements is ten feet and a variance is needed. The neighbor on
the South is approximately twelve feet from the property resulting in
a seventeen foot separation between structures.
A new garage will be constructed in the rear yard with access off Oak
Street. The placement of the new garage is easily accessible off Oak
St l"~eet .
Discussion followed, with emphasis on the fact that the structure is
already existing. Applicant agrees to the conditions of approval as
stated.
No audience comment.
Judy Curtis motion to approve the variance subject to conditions as
stated. Seconded by Angela Anderson. Unamimously approved.
e
Planning Commission
Mal"~ch 12, 1990
g8E!;_~Q~_QeL~L~Q=!Q-De~igY" Pel"~mit and Val"~iarlce tel the SigY'1 A
Ordinance of the placenent of a forty five square foot banner sign on ~
the Old Post Office Building at 220 East Myrtle Street in the CBD,
Central Business District. Tom Schweitz, Applicant.
ApplicC:\Y'lt, Tom Scheitz,1 pl"~eseY'lted the l"~equest tel the SigY'1 Val"~iaY'lce tCI
members, emphasizing t~e fact that people do not notice the business
without adequate signage.
Discussion followed on Ithe type, size, and color of the sign to be
used. Robb Hamlin req~ested that the sign be adequately secured to
the buildirlg. I
Jean Schweitz question Id condition of approval number two, since
there were other signs placed on the sidewalk by other businesses.
Steve Russell, Community Development Director, clarified the fact
that the sidewalk sign are illegal and are not allowed. Councilman
Kimble agreed that the signs impede foot traffic and the City does
not want that type of liability.
No audience comment.
Russell recommended ap roval based on the addition to the conditions
of approval that the sign would be securely attached to the building.
Robb Hamlin motion to pprove the variance subject to the conditions
of approval, including a new provision number four that the sign
would be securely atta hed to the building.
e
Angela Anderson, secon
Unanimously approved.
g8E!;_~Q~_EYeL~Q=!g-A S ecial Use Permit to conduct an
over-the-telephone ser ice business at 1405 South Sixth Street in the
RB , Two Family Residertial District. Jeffrey H. Skinner, Applicant.
Jeffrey Skinner, appli ant presented the request to the Commission,
and explained his plan for the business which will consist of
washing commercial and residential windows. No audience comment.
Motion to approve with conditions of approval by Judy Curtis.
Seconded by Jay Kimble. Unanimously approved.
g8E!;_~Q_~L~Q=!~-A vari nce to the front and rear setback
requirements for the ccnstruction of a home at 322 West Hickory
Street in the RB, Two amily Residnetial District. Greg Holmquist,
Appl icaY'lt.
e
Planning Commission
March 12, 1990
e
Case No. V/90-13 (continued)
Russell presented a letter from the owner of the adjacent property,
Margaret Carlson of 318 W. Hickot~y. The letter expressed disapproval
of the seven foot variance, askirlg consideration for more than seven
feet.
Applicant expressed the desire to preset~ve the existing trees and to
build the best house for the available funds. The members reviewed
the house plans and discussed the possibility of building the house
to fit the existing lot size.
Margaret Carlson, and son, discussed further dissapproval, stating
the existing trees were not a viable concern.
Herman Duckworth, neighbor one block away, stated the variance was
too extreme and the City should adhere to the building codes.
Gerald Fontaine considered the case to be a hardship case due to
costs, but to respect the neighbors a minimum variance of ten feet
was reasonable.
Robb Hamlin stated the right of the neighbors should take precedence
over parking considerations and the neighbors should not absorb the
entire considerations.
~ When questioned by Shirley Duckworth, neighbor, about the fot~ sale
sign in the yard, applicant stated that financial considerations were
a major problem and the lot may still have to be sold.
Robb Hamlin suggested amending the conditions of approval to a
rearyard setback of ten feet, with a front yard set-back of fourteen
feet.
Discussion followed on drainage of the site, setbacks, alternative
plans, and the surrounding homes in the area.
Robb Hamlin motion to approve subject to the conditions of approval
plus the addition of the terl foot sideyard and 14 foot front yard
conditions. Glenna Bealka seconded. Unanimously approved.
g8~g_~Q~_~L~Q=1~-Variance to the Parking Ordinance for a 6,482
square foot office building at 201 North Second Street in the CBD,
Central Business District. George Spevacek, Opus Corporation,
Applicant.
On behalf of West Publishing Company, who purchased Conco Shoe
building, George Spevacek presented the request for the parking
variance to members. West Publishing Co. would be occupying the
building and agree to the conditions of approval as stated.
~
The company would be open between the hours of 7 AM and 11 PM.
majority of the employees work between 8 AM and 12 noon.
The
Planning Commission
March 12, 1'3'30
CASE No. V/'30-14 (ContinU~d)
I
,
Russell explained the parUing demand of the use is being moved from a
I
heavy demand area, South ~ain Street, to a this South Second Steet
location. Members agreed Ithat the parking was lighter in this area.
Motion to approve sUbjectllto conditions by Councilman Kimble, was
seconded by Warren pakulsli. Unanimously approved.
~8~~_~Q~_~L~Q=!~-Variance!to the parking ordinance for expansion of
a restaurant/take-out bus~ness at 826 South Fourth Street in the CA,
General Commercial Distriqt. Donald Istel, Applicant.
Russell stated the owner
aware of the exact plans
until a later date for ap
approval, the City cannot
Discussion followed with
spaces and demand for exi
seating would allow for a
be less people at any giv
e
contacted him and that the owner
nd would prefer that the commission
roval. Further, that without owner
approve the variance.
was rfclt
wait
udience comment on the number of parking
ting parking. Applicant explained the
maximum of 16 people and that there would
rf time.
Mr. Rarlum, 20 S. 4th Stre t, expressed concerns over enforcement of
residential parking and sated the residential only parking sign on
his block was not enforce. Parking permits were suggested as a
mearls clf restt~ict irlg pat~k. rIg in frc.rlt clf his fClln~-plex, tc. erlable tit
convenient parking for hi tenants. The winter parking does not pose
a problem to the tenants, since there is no enforcement.
Robb Hamlin questioned th residential parking restriction, since
every citizen is a reside t. Hamlin further emphasized the added
costs to the City when th winter snow ordinance is violated.
Adjacent neighbor, Carl DlRue, expressed concet~ns over the offensive
odors radiating from the xhaust vent of the restaurant. Discussion
followed on the solution 0 the odors. Applicant expressed the
desire to locate an exhau t vent on the roof to remedy the problem.
Following lengthy discuss'on two conditions were added as follows:
1. Appt~oval cClrltirlgerlt u clr, wt~itterl appt~c'val by the owr,er
2. Relocating the exhaus vent
3. All nondelivery restalrant employees would park in the rear lot.
Motion to approve subject to conditions, by Robb Hamlin.
Warren Pakulski. Unanimolsly approved.
Secclnded by
e
< .
Planning Commission
Ma}"ch 12, 1990
e
~8~~_~Q~_~L~Q=!~-Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance for the
placemerlt clf a d}"i veway ove}" publ ic p}"c'perty, arId lmimpt'oved t'c.ad, at
Hazel and Third Streets in the RA, Single Family Residential
District. Don Baker, Steve Erban, and Joe Gould, Applicants.
Applicant, Joe Baker, presented the request for a variance to members
and explained the proposed parcels of property. The location of the
access road and future maintenance was discussed.
Russell told members that the road was a historic landmark in the
area. Also, the road was on City property, but not on the
right-of-way, which meant the road was not maintained in the winter
months. The City would require the road to be in a condition of
minimum standards, with a gravel base and a two inch mat, and would
maintain the road thereafter.
Bill Hubbard, owner of one of the lots, explained a prior petition to
vacate Willow Street and possible use of his property.
Discussion followed on maintenance, amount of traffic, access to
properties, the small brid~e which needed to be removed, pavement of
the road, and driveways.
Robb Hamlin motion to approve subject to conditibns of approval as
written. Seconded by Warren Pakulski. Unanimously approved.
e ~8~~_~Q~_el:!QL~~=:Z! -PUD Amerld merit f m' pat' k i rl g l.:,t 1 c.ca t i c.n f c.}" the
Washinton County Government Center office expansion at 14900 North
51st Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Washington County, Applicant.
Fred Shank, Architect BWBR, and Lyle Doerr, Facilities Director of
Washington County, gave a brief description of the site plan.
Question and answers followed.
Robb Hamlin expressed disapproval over the size of the facility in a
residential area. Further, that the facility is oversized for the
area and decentralized facilities might be an option.
Dave Rhinehart, property owner, expressed strong dissapproval of the
size of the facility, the landscape barriers, and the overall process
of the design and implementation of the new facility with a lack of
concern for the adjacent property owners.
Lengthy discussion followed on landscape needs for adjacent property
owners and the future landscaping plans. Landscaping plans will be
reviewed by the Planning Commision at a later date.
Fred Shank emphasized the concerns of the County Board for the
residents, along with the costs involved in the new facility.
e
Motion by Angela Anderson to approve, seconded by Judy Curtis.
Hamlin Opposed. Approved.
Robb
Planning COMMission
March 12, 1990
OTHER ITEMS
Case No. SUP/89-31- A Spec"al Use PerMit review to locate a
portable trailer ticket bo th for the Minnesota Transportation MuseuM
train ride attractions at he North end of Hooley's parking lot in
the CBD, Central Business istrict and the Flood
Plain/Bluffland/Shoreland istrict. Aaron Issacs, Applicant.
e
Robb HaMlin discussed the
enforceMent of the sign or
ion on safety and the location of the
Judy Curtis led the
portable toilets.
quare footage of the signage and
inance.
Motion by Robb HaMlin to a prove the Special Use PerMit with review
each yeat~. Seconded by Wa~ren Pakulski. UnaniMously approved.
B~EQb~IIQ~
Review of proposed
site district.
Russell recoMMended approv 1 of the developMent district Modification
as consistent with the Cit of Stillwater COMprehensive Plan
(Resolution)~
developMent prograM (TIF) for scattered
Motion to approve the resolution as stated by Warren Pakulski,
seconded by Judy Curtis. naniMously approved.
e
Motion to adjourn at 10:15 PM, by Judy Curtis.
HaMlin. UnaniMous.
Seconded by Robb
e
lo<
e
~
e
....
r illwater
'~ ~ ~
-- -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MARCH 29, 1990
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, ORLEANS TERRACE, PHASE I
CASE NO. PUD/89-82, HERITAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPLICANTS
DESCRIPTION:
Final Plat Approval for Phase I, Orleans Terrace, consisting of nine lots with
seven sixplex units.
DISCUSSION:
The request is for Final Plat Approval for nine lots; two located off Cottage
Drive (Lot 1 and Outlot B), six located off of a cul-de-sac, Terrace Court,
and Outlot A located between Orleans Street and Stillwater Boulevard as shown
on the site plan. The proposal includes seven sixplex units; one off of
Cottage Drive and six located off of a cul-de-sac, Terrace Court. This is
Final Approval for Phase I of a PUD Amendment and Subdivision request which
was approved by the City Council on February 6, 1990 (PUD/89-83 and
SUB/89-82) consisting of fourteen sixplex units; eight located off of Cottage
Drive and six located off of a cul-de-sac, Terrace Court Street. The proposal
was approved with the following conditions.
1. Approval of PUD/89-3 is rescinded with this approval.
2. No building permits shall be issued until sanitary sewer service is
available to the site. (One model unit could be constructed at the
corner of Cottage Drive and County Road 5. The sewer connection design
and construction shall be the responsibility of the contractor.)
3. A sidewalk shall be installed along the north and east side of Cottage
Drive (the cost of the sidewalks shall be shared 50/50 by the developer
of the.Cottages and the developer of the condominiums.)
4. All utilities shall be undergrounded.
5. All electrical boxes and gas meters shall be located so they cannot be
seen from public streets or screened with landscaping or architectural
detail compatible with the building.
6. Landscaping for the Pond Area shall be installed after initial grading
and before first phase construction.
7. A grading permit with erosion control measures shall be required before
grading begins.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
, ..
e
8. New utilities easements for the sewer line and pond shall be shown in
the final plat.
9. Building 1, if it remains, shall be set back 40 feet from County Road 5.
10. Landscaping for each site shall be completed within six months of
completion of each building site. (The developer shall provide a cash
deposit or other acceptable security of 125% of the contract costs of
landscaping improvements to ensure their installation.)
11. All lawn areas shall be sodded.
12. Tile developer shall assure the City that all landscaping 'is established
and healthy for a two year period after initial planting.
14. The trash receptacles shall be screened with a structure compatible with
the design of the residential structures.
15. The Terrace Court right-of-way shall be 34 feet and cul-de-sac radius 46
feet with a 10 foot utility easement on either side of the street.
16. A final plat shall be recorded before building permits are issued.
4It 17. Two guest parking spaces shall be provided for each six-plex.
18. No slopes on site shall have a slope of more than 3:1 without an
approved retaining wall.
The representative for Heritage Development has agreed to the stated
conditions. The City Engineer is reviewing the Final Plat. His comments and
possible additional conditions shall be accepted before construction begins.
--
e
~
~
r illwater
~ - ~
T H ::-1 R T H P LAC E 0 F M 1 N N E SOT A ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT DEPARTMENT
MARCH 29, 1990
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT APPROVAL (CASE NO. SUB/89-69) FOR A SUBDIVISION OF A
14.963 ACRE PARCEL (OUTLOT B, PARCEL C OF THE STILLWATER INDUSTRIAL
PARK). .
DESCRIPTION:
Final Plat Approval for a subdivision of a 14.963 acre parcel into seven lots
ranging in size from 1.88 acres to 3.89 acres.
DISCUSSION:
ThlS lS a Final Plat Approval to .subdivide a 14.963 acre parcel into seven
lots ranging in size from 1.88 acres to 3.89 acres. This large lot is located
on the Northeast corner of Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue.
Preliminary approval for this subdivision was granted by the Council on
November 7, 1989.
All conditions have been met. The City Engineer is reviewing the Final Plat.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
ONE YEAR REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/89-31
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: Hooleyls Parking Lot
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning District: CBD
Flood Plain: Yes
Bluffland/Shoreland: Yes
Applicant's Name: Aaron Issacs, Minnesota Transportation Museum
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
An annual review of a Special Use Permit for the placement of a temporary
ticket trailer for Minnesota Transportation Museum Train rides from Hooley's
(Cub Foods) Parking Lot.
DISCUSSION:
The request is to place a temporary trailer ticket window along with several
portable toilets on the east side of Hooleyls (Cub parking lot) for the 1990
season of the MTM train.
~ The booth location as shown on the site plan is twenty feet east of where the
booth was located last year. As explained in the attached letter, this
location was chosen for safety reasons.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. No off-site signage shall be allowed without permits. Signage of the
ticket office is limited to four square feet.
2. The MTM shall clean up brush and railroad ties along railroad line to
Highway 95 before June 1, 1990.
3. The ticket booth shall be removed by November 1, 1990.
4. This permit shall be reviewed by March 1991 for the 1991 season.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval for 1990 season.
ATTACHMENTS:
- Site Plan.
- Letter from Minnesota Transporation Museum, Inc.
- Letter from Cub Foods.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
- Approval with one year review.
e
e
ONE YEAR REVIEW
CASE NO. ~UP /~9-~
Planning Commission Meeting: March 12, 1990
Project Location: Hooley's Parking Lot
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning Di strict: caD
Flood Plain: Yes
Bluffland/Snoreland: Yes
Applicant's Name: Aaron Issacs, Minnesota Transportation Museum
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
An annual reVlew or-a Special Use Permit for the placement of a temporary
ticket trailer for Minnesota Transportation Museum Train rides from Hooley's
(Cub Foods) Parking Lot.
DISCUSSION:
The-request is to place a temporary trailer ticket window along with several
portable toilets on tne east side of Hooleyls (Cub parking l~T) for the 1990
season of the MTM train. _
~
Tne booth location as shown on tile site plan is twenty feet east of where the
booth was located last year. As explained in the attached letter, this
location was chosen for safety reasons.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
---l:-NOOff-site--STgnage shall be allowed without permits. Signage of the
ticket office is limited to four square feet.
2. The MTM shall clean up brush and railroad ties along railroad line to
Highway 95 before June 1, 1990.
3. The ticket booth shall be removed by November 1, 1990.
4. Tnis permit shall be reviewed by March 1991 for the 1991 season.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval for 1990 season.
ATTACHMENTS:
--":--S i te PT an.
- Letter from Minnesota Transporation Museum, Inc.
- Letter from Cub Foods.
e
ct?& Ilt~~
~~/~~
~.-."".,
,. ...... \
! ~I~~I! Minnesota Transportation Museum, Inc.
el., I l P.O. Box 1796, Pioneer Station, St. Paul, MN 55101-0796
....... .~ Accredited by the Minnesota Historical Society
-.-."
Mr. Steve Russell
City Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
e
Dear Mr. Russell:
I am writing to request an extension of the special
use permit for the museum's railroad ticket trailer in down-
town Stillwater.
For the past three years we have used homemade plywood
booth mounted on a trailer frame. This year we will switch to
a small camper trailer modified with ticket windows. It is
slightly larger than the old trailer.
The location will continue to be on property leased by
Cub Foods northeast of Hooley's market. The exact location will
shift about twenty feet to the east, across the parking lot
driveway from the tracks. This will move our customers away from
the tracks. We will once again have several portable toilets.
They will also be located east of the tracks. Both moves will
improve safety be reducing pedestrian activity near the tracks.
Our trains will run from May 26 to Oct. 21. Departures
will be 10:15 on Sat. and Noon, 2:00 and 4:00 on Sat. and Sun.
The railroad operation has continued to grow and mature.
Ridership was 5000 in 1987, 10,000 in 1988 and 20,000 in 1989.
We have added railroad cars and locomotives and invested heavily
in our track. Our volunteer crews become larger and more pro-
fessional each year.
Despite the increased ridership, we feel that parking in the
area is quite adequate. No one has complained to us about being
unable to park.
We believe the railroad is a significant addition to the
historic appeal of Stillwater. Thank you for your consideration
of our permit request.
Respectfully, ~
-~~V'~-tA#j/
Aaron Isaacs,
President
e
e
~
e
~
Cub Foods
@
February 27, 1990
Mr. Aaron Isaacs, President
Minnesota Transportation Museum, Inc.
3816 Vincent Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55410
Dear Mr. Isaacs:
This letter is to confirm our conversation regarding your museum transportation trailer.
vVe agreed that you could place your trailer on the northeast end of the Cub Foods pa~.king
lot. This would be east of the present railroad tracks. My understanding is that you would
place this trailer at this location for the summer months only. Please contact your
insurance carrier and issue us a certificate of insurance. You also agreed to provide portable
toilets for your riders' use. You indicated that you were going to be presenting this to the
city of Stillwater for approval. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact
me.
Sinc~rely,
(~rfl (!{u:&Ck
Roger Ruetten,
Manager of Expense C\.)ntrol & Admin.
RR/cke
cc. Rick Krueger
Tom Thueson
1237RR
127 Water Street · P.O. Box 9 · Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0009 · (612)-439-7200
:?
~
\
.....
..
.
\
:1 \ ~ ~ 1"
I ~ , :: \
I . i , I
I ~: ~ \
, --... I \ \ \
( ~
J-~_O
I ,';, \ \
I \ \
I \
1 \
\ \
\
--.J
"".
\
.
a
I
\
I \
f :
\ ,J
\........--/
Q
/~.
I r o.
\.,/ .......0
\
\~\
\
\
\
\
\
_/
.z
~
:0
e
;(;->~~
\J ~
- ~
Slt\E.€.l
\
<:)
o
~
n
<:)
~
<:)
\
\ ~
\
\
\ \ \
~l
I
\
.
.
.
.
.
\
\
\
\
}
(
\
\
\i
\
\
\\
\\
\
\\
\ \
\ ,
\ \
--.-
. f , ..
e'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF STILLWATER
615493
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL USE PROCEEDINGS
In the matt~r of the Planning Case
No. SUP 189-31
Request By: ORDER GRANTING SPECIAL
Northern Pacific Railroad Co.
USE PERMIT
Minnesota Transportation Museum, Inc.
Applicant.
The above entitled matter came on to be
16th day of May
Special Use Permit pursuant to the City
property:
t\\;Pt of Lot 8 beg on E li.ne of ~Jater St 18J. ft il of r~line of r,1,Vrtle St. thence
~m N along ~Jater St 65 ft thence E at RT ang 42 ft thence S par with Hater St 65
.~~ ft thence W 42 ft to Beg. AIC RR lease Block 18 City of Stillwater.
'j,'"J" Purpose:
j
heard before the City Council on the
, 19 89, on a request for a
Code for the-rollowing described
To locate a portable ticket booth for historic train operation.
e
Upon motion made and duly approved by the requisite majority of the City
Council, it is ordered that a Special Use Permit be granted upon the following
conditions: (If no conditions, state "None".)
1. No off-site signage shall be allowed without permits. Signage of the
ticket office limited to four square feet.
2. The MTM shall clean up brush and railroad ties along railroad line
to Highway 95 before June 1, 1989.
3. The temporary ticket booth shall be removed by November 1, 1989.
4. This permit shall be reviewed by March 1990 for the 1990 season.
Dated this
,dv
/3 --
day of
'7/:7JV~V
e
It. i .1
L~u'ly
, 19 .f7 .
(J/~c(./c(1..) J.L!J-tJ'}.t.-
Mayor
e
~
~
PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO.
An Ordinance Amending the
Stillwater City Charter
The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain:
1. The Stillwater City Charter Commission has recommended
to the City Council that Article IV ELECTIONS, Section 4.05 be
added to the City Charter that will hereafter read as follows:
"ARTICLE IV
ELECTIONS
4.05 Campaign Financial Reports. When a candidate
for Mayor or City Council is required to file campaign
financial reports pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ~ 211A, a
summary of the report shall be published five (5) days
before a primary, five days before a general election and
five days before a special election. The summary shall
include the following information:
(a) The total amount of receipts and expenditures,
(b) The name of any individual or committee that
during the year has made contributions that in the aggregate
are equal to or greater than $500,
(c) A statement that a complete campaign financial
report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and
available for public examination or inspection.
This summary may be published in any newspaper of
general circulation within the City, at the expense of the
City. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
take this action for the City."
2. The foregoing Article IV, Section 4.05 is hereby
adopted and shall be in full force and effect from and after the
passage and publication of this ordinance according to law.
3. This action is taken pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
~ 410.12, Subd. 7 which allows the City Council, by ordinance, to
change the Charter upon unanimous vote, after recommendation by
the Charter Commission.
4. The Stillwater City Charter and all ordinances of the
City shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.
Passed by unanifous vote
Stillwater City counfil this
1990. I
of the Mayor and members of the
day of
Published:
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, Cl rk
,
~
e
~
~
~
e
,
MINNESOTA STATE ARMORY BUILDING COMMISSION
20 West 12th Street
st. Paul, Minnesota 55155-2098
March IS, 1990
Mr. Nile Kriesel
City Coordinator
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
/
Dear Mr. Kriesel:
General John Cox requested that I send you copies of
resolutions of support that have been submitted by various
cities to the Minnesota state Armory Building Commission. I
think you will find the language used in these to be
appropriate for your needs.
Please do not hesitate to call me if I can be of further
assistance. I can be reached at 296-4678.
Sincerely,
~W-~ ,P~.J
Terrence J. Palmer
Executive Director
MSABC
\9J~~
\0
,\tr.~.
e
City of Rosemount
Resolution 1988- 35
A Resolution Declaring Intent in
Participating in the Construction of
A New National Guard Armory/Community Facility
WHEREAS, the Department of Military Affairs, State of Minnesota,
through the Adjutant General has expressed a commitment to construct
a new National Guard Armory in the City of Rosemount; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is very interested in cooperating with
the National Guard in the development of an Armory and community
facility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rosemount deems the
National Guard as being an integral part in the development of the
community deserving of its support; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rosemount is interested in cooperating 10 the
construction of a joint facility.
~
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Rosemount is committed to furnishing a site and participating in the
planning, design and construction of a new National Guard Armory
Building and in providing assistance for the same in accordance with
the Minnesota State Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rosemount pledges the resources of the City of Rosemount in every
reasonable degree to support the aforesaid aim and that the cooperative
planning begin immediately.
Adopted this 3rd day of May, 1988.
~L?~
Rollan Hoke, Mayor
ATTEST:
~
CITY OF APPLE-VALLEY
RESOLUTION NO. 1988-92
e
A RESOLU ION DECLARING INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
CONSTRUCTION F A NEW NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY/COMMUNITY FACILITY
~HEREAS, the Dep rtment of Military Affairs, State of Minnesota, through
the Adjutant General, has expressed a commitment to construct a new National
Guard Armory in the C ty of Apple Valley, and
WHEREAS, the CitYI of Apple Valley is very interested in cooperating with
the National Guard in the development of an Armory and community facility,
and
WHEREAS, the Cit Council of the City of Apple Valley deems the National
Guard as being an integral part in the development of the community deserving
of its support, and
WHEREAS, the City of Apple Valley is interested in cooperating in the
construction of a join facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, B
Valley, Dakota County,
site and participating
National Guard Armory
accordance with Minnes
IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple
Minnesota, that the City is committed to furnishing a
in the planning, design and construction of a new
uilding and in providing assistance for the same in
ta State Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RES LVED that the City Council of the City of Apple Valley e
pledges the resources f the City in every reasonable degree to support the
aforesaid aim and that the cooperative planning begin immediately.
ADOPTED this 26th day of May, 1988.
ATTEST:
CERTIFICATE
I, MARY E. MUELLER, City Clerk of the City of Apple Valley, hereby
certify that the foreeoi g resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution adopted by th Apple Valley City Council on May 26, 1988.
"
e
1
e
RESOLUTION # 12-30-89
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF ANNANDALE,
MINNESOTA DECLARING ITS INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COMMUNITY CENTER/NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY
WHEREAS, the Department of Military Affairs, State of
Minnesota, through the Adjutant General, has expressed a
commitment of construct a new National Guard Armory in the
City of Annandale, Minnesota, and
WHEREAS, the City of Annandale is very interested in
cooperating with the National Guard in the development of an
Armory and community center, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Annandale
deems the National Guard as being an integral part in the
development of the community deserving of its support, and
WHEREAS, the City of Annandale is interested in
cooperating in the construction of a joint facility.
e
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Annandale, Wright County, Minnesota, that the
City is committed to furnishing a site and participating in
the planning and design of a new National Guard Armory
Building and in providing assistance for the same in
accordance with Minnesota State Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Annandale pledges the resources of the City in every
reasonable degree to support the aforesaid aim and that the
cooperative planning begin immediately.
This resolution was passed and adopted on this 18th day
of December, 1989 by the City Council of the City of
Annandale, Minnesota.
1{f~HW
Val Lawler, Mayor
AT?J: A 1.,
l),itt1t I ;L~~
Patrick A. Nasi, City Admin/Clerk
~
e
e
e
, '
CITY OF STILLWATER
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING CITY INTENT
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY/COMMUNITY FACILITY
WHEREAS, the Department of Military Affairs, State of
Minnesota, through the Adjutant General, has expressed a
commitment to construct a new National Guard Armory in the City
of Stillwater; and
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater is very interested in
cooperating with the National Guard in the development of an
Armory and Community Facility; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Stillwater deems
the National Guard as being an integral part in the development
of the community that is deserving of community support; and
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater is interested in cooperating
in the construction of a joint facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City
of Stillwater is committed to furnishing a site and participating
in the planning, design and construction of a new National Guard
Armory Building and in providing assistance for the same in
accordance with the Minnesota State Statutes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Stillwater pledges the resources of the City of Stillwater in
every reasonable degree to support this aim and pledges that the
cooperative planning should begin immediately.
Adopted this
day of April, 1990.
Wally Abrahamson, Mayor
Attest:
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk
e
e
~
..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and city Council
FR:
City Coordinator
DA:
March 29, 1990
RE:
DOCK. PERMIT APPLICATION
Accompanying this memo is the application for renewal of the Dock Facility Permit
submitted by the st. Croix Boat and Packet Company. The permit was reviewed and
approved by the Stillwater Port Authority (see enclosed minutes of previous Port
Authority meeting). The fees as recommended by the Port Authority are as
follows:
$500
$500
$500
for each charter and excursion boat (3
for municipal boats (1
for each ticket office vessel (1
$1,500)
= $ 500)
$ 500)
The total fees for St. Croix Boat and Packet Company for 1990 would be $2,500
as compared to $1,000 for 1989.
The Corp of Engineers has not yet issued their permit for the docks. However,
at the last meeting (3-13-90) the Port Authority met with Corp of Engineers, DNR
and Boundary Commission representatives to discuss the dock facilities and more
specifically the floating ticket vessel. The results of the meeting were that
the Corp of Engineers staff stated that they would recommend (to their
supervisors who have final authority) that the floating ticket office be approved
for a temporary period which would end at expiration of the Aiple lease
agreement. This would allow the City and st. Croix Boat and Packet Company time
to develop plans for an on-land office building - possibly down river on the
Aiple property. I can expand on this at the meeting Tuesday night.
Also enclosed is the proposed dock permit that was reviewed and approved by the
Port Authority. The permit is identical to the permit that was issued last year
except for the change in fees and condition #9 which limits the number of vessels
that can use the facilities.
Finally, in the past the 22EE permit was issued to the City rather to the actual
owner/operator of the facility. This was done because at the time the City did
not have any rules, regulations or ordinance regulating wharfs or docks. The
City subsequently adopted Ordinance No. 605 (City Code Chapter 48.11) regulating
the st. Croix Riverfront including dock permits to be issued by the City. The
Port Authority recommends that the Corp permit be issued to the owner/operator
instead of the City. The Corp staff agreed to issue the permit to the st. Croix
Boat and Packet Company. I would recommend the Council ratify this action.
e
DOCK PERMIT
Pursuant to Chapter 48.11 of the Stillwater City Code, the Stillwater City
Council hereby grants to the Stillwater Boat and Packet company a
Charter/Excursion and General Boating Dock Permit upon the following terms and
conditions:
1. The dock shall be located approximately 150 feet south of East Nelson
Street and in all ways abide by the rules and regulations and permit
conditions of the Corps of Engineers of the United States Army and
the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
2. No gas pump shall be located on the docks.
3. The dock company shall not discriminate against any patron on the
basis of race, creed, national origin, sex or social status.
4. The permittee agrees to abide by all rules and regulations and
restrictions set forth in Chapter 48.11 of the Stillwater City Code
relative to the regulation of the waterfront.
5. The dock company shall submit a schedule of fees for general boat
docking charged by the permittee upon request of the City.
e
6.
The permittee shall provide the City of Stillwater with a Certificate
of Insurance evidencing One Million/Three Million General Liability
Coverage of their operation, naming the City as an additional insured
under the policies as their interest may appear.
7. The permittee shall provide pump-out privileges for marine heads
for any boater requesting this privilege at the same rate and fee
charged to boats that are moored at the dock for a fee.
8. The City of Stillwater reserves the right to request inspection of
heads, electrical system or other unsafe conditions.
9. The dock facilities shall be limited to three (3) charter and/or
excursion boats, one (1) floating ticket office vessel and must also
accommodate a reasonable number of transient boats but in no event
shall the boats or vessels exceed the limitation specified in the
permit issued by U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
10. This permit must be renewed annually and the City reserves the right
from time to time to establish, change or modify the dock permit fee.
The annual dock permit fee for the time period specified in No. 16
below shall be $500 for each charter and/or excursion boat, $500
for a floating ticket office vessel and $500 for transient boats.
11.
The City reserves the right to request the dock company's assistance
in assuring that patrons and guests of patrons of the dock company
will park in a designated municipal parking lot so as to not
unreasonably interfere with other park and commercial traffic.
~
.
.....'
12.
No person sha~l build a fire in any area of the docking premises or
in any vessell moored at the dock.
13. The City does not by this permit accept any reasonability for
dredging' the dock area or making the docking area free from
obstructions r other hazards to navigation.
14. The City is 'n no way responsible for storage of the docks during
the off seaso and the permittee agrees to abide by any decision of
the Port Auth rity or City Council with regard to a place for their
proper stora e.
15. The City rese es the right from time to time to add to or amend the
rules and re lations herein set forth as are from time to time
needed to pr tect the health, safety and welfare of the City.
16. The duration of this permit shall be from April 3, 1990 until the
end of the 19 0 boating season or November 1, 1990 whichever occurs
earlier.
Dated this
day of
, 1990.
CITY OF STILLWATER:
BY
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
~
e
e
e
MINUTES
STIIJ..WATER. PORT AUTHORITY
MARCH 13, 1990
Members Present:
Jim O'Brien, Dean Funke, Jim Schultz, Barrett Colombo and Babe
Orff
Members Absent:
Harry Peterson
Also Present:
Mayor Wally Abrahamson, City Coordinator Nile Kriesel and City
Attorney Dave Magnuson
Prior to convening the meeting the Port Authority participated
in a meeting between the Corp (Jf Engineers, DNR, st. Croix Boat
and Packet Company and the City of Stillwater. The purpose
of the meeting was to discuss issue/conditions related to the
dock facilities south of East Nelson Street owned and operated
by the st. Croix Boat and Packet Company. The primary issue
was the permit application to include a floating ticket office
vessel. Corp of Engineers representatives stated that they
would recommend the approval of the vessel for a temporary
period with the permit for the vessel expiring at the end of
the Aiple lease of City owned property (the docks could
possibly be relocated at that time and a land based office
could also possibly be constructed).
e Approval of Minutes
Note:
Dean Funke moved to approve the minutes of February 21, 1990 meeting, second by
Jim Schultz. All in favor.
No-Wake/Speed Zone
Discussion was held regarding the establishment of a no-wake zone by the
riverfront adjacent to the downtown area. City Attorney Magnuson said that the
City regulated the waters for a distance of 100 feet out from the shoreline.
However, the placement of buoys would be regulated by the Corp of Engineers.
Motion by Dean Funke, second by Jim Schultz to direct City staff to
determine the appropriate procedure for establishing a no-wake zone
in the downtown area along with proper signage and/or buoys.
All in favor.
St. Croix Boat and Packet Company
Dock Permit
e
Discussion was held regarding the dock permit application and associated fees
for the st. Croix Boat and Packet docks. The discussion included questions
about the fees charged by other dock facility operators, the fees for launching
regular watercraft and the fees that are charged by the st. Croix Boat and
Packet Company for docking transient boats.
Motion by Dean Funke, seconded by Jim Schultz to approve the dock
permit application for i990 subject to the conditions contained in
the Dock Permit pre~ared by the City Attorney and subject to the
following fees:
e
$500 for docki
$500 for each
$500 for the f
($2,500 total
All in favor.
g transient boats.
harter/excursion boat (3).
oating ticket office vessel
ermit fee.)
(City Coordinator iesel was directed to contact other potential
excursion boat oper tors such as the Taylors Falls Princess to expedite
the wharfage permit ~plication process for the 1990 boating season).
Adjournment
Motion by Babe Grff, seconded by Dean Funke to adjourn the meeting at
12:08 p.m.
All in favor.
Recorder:
Nile L. Kriesel
e
e
e
e
e
MINUTES
S~ILLWATER PORT AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 21, 1990
Members Present:
Acting Chairman Jim O'Brien, Dean Funke, Harry Peterson and
Jim Schultz
Members Absent:
Babe Orff and Barrett Colombo
Also Present:
Mayor Wally Abrahamson, City Coordinator Nile Kriesel and City
Attorney Dave Magnuson
Approval of Minutes
Dean Funke moved to approve the minutes of April 5, 1989 meeting, seconded by
Jim Schultz. All in favor.
Election of Officers
The following officers were elected for calendar year ending December 31, 1990:
President - Jim O'Brien
Vice President - Jim Schultz
Secretary - Harry Peterson
Docking Facility Permit Application
Nile Kriesel informed the commission about the status of the dock facility permit
application that has been made by the City to the Corp of Engineers. Mr. Kriesel
said the Corp was in the process of completing the paperwork for the permit.
It appeared that the Corp will be approving the permit but are not going to allow
the floating ticket office vessel to remain at the facility. Dick Anderson of
the st. Croix Boat & Packet Company has talked to the Corp officials to try to
get approval for the ticket office vessel. The Corp has indicated that it will
take about three to four more weeks to issue the permit.
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) also requires a dock permit and Mr.
Kriesel has contacted that agency to determine what they require for the issuance
of a permit.
Motion by Dean Funke, seconded by Jim Schultz to set the next Port
Authority meeting for 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 14, 1990 and to
request the presence of Dick or Don Anderson and representatives of
the Corp of Engineers and the DNR.
All in favor.
Further discussion was held regarding the question of who should be the
permittee for the dock facilities. Mr. Kriesel stated that the City has been
the permittee for the Corp of Engineers and DNR permit rather than the actual
owners/operators of the dock. This apparently was initially done in order to
give the City more control over the docks. However, Attorney Magnuson said that
City Ordinance -Chapter 48.01 - also required a dock permit from the City and
believed the ordinance provided sufficient control over the docks. Mr. Kriesel
also said that he was con~erned that as the permittee for the Corp/DNR permit
the City would be subject to any penalties associated with violatipn of the
Corp/DNR permit - even trough the City may not be aware of or be directly
involved in the violation~
e
Motion by Dean Fu ke, second by Jim Schultz to require the
owner/operator of d cking facilities to obtain permits from the Corp
of Engine~rs, DNR d any other permitting agency.
All in favor.
Discussion was also held egarding the process related to the issuance of the
City issued dock facilit permit that is required by City ordinance. Mr.
Kriesel said that the p ocess followed in t,he past was to have the Port
Authority review the pe it application and then recommend approval or denial
to the City Council wh would give final approval/denial. Mr. Magnuson
suggested that the Port A thority should issue or deny the permit and that the
City Council could act as an appeals board.
Motion by Jim Schu tz, seconded by Dean Funke to direct the City
Attorney to draft ordinance amendment that would establish the
Port Authority as t e dock permitting authority and the City Council
would act as an app als board.
All in favor.
other Business
e
Mayor Abrahamson the need to keep the Port Authority as an active
board due to the numbe of waterfront related issues such as the dock
facilities, the deterior ted condition of the levy and the Aiple Property.
Mayor Abrahamson stressed the importance of the Authority and suggested finding
ways to make the public m re aware of the purpose and function of the Authority.
The next meeting
p.m., Wednesday, March 14, 1990
Adjournment
Motion by Harry Pe erson, seconded by Jim Schultz to adjourn the
meeting at 4 p.m.
All in favor.
Recorder:
Nile L. Kriesel
e
,
, ~9~, mJ1JW~~~@'1r&
· ~~'> EARTH DAY 1990
...../
e
e
P.O. Box 10329: Minneapolis. Minnesota 55458-3329
(612) 627-4049
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS. almost twenty years ago. more than twenty million Americans joined together on Earth
Day in a demonstration of concern for the environment. and their collective action resulted in the
passage of sweeping new laws to protect our air. water. and land:
WHEREAS. in the nineteen years since the first Earth Day. despite environmental improvements. the
environmental health of the planet is increasingly endangered. threatened by Global Climate Change.
Ozone Depletion. Growing World Population. Tropical Deforestation. Ocean Pollution. Toxic Wastes.
Desertification. and Nuclear Waste requiring action by all sectors of society:
WHEREAS. Earth Day 1990 is a national and international call to action for all citizens to join in a
global effort to save the planet:
WHEREAS. Earth Day 1990 activities and events will educate all citizens on the importance of acting
in an environmentally sensitive fashion by recycling. consexving energy and water. using efficient
transportation. and adopting more ecologically sound lifestyles:
WHEREAS. Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of buying and using those
products least harmful to the environment:
WHEREAS, Earth Day 1990 will educate all. citizens on the importance of doing business with
companies that are environmentally sensitive and responsible:
WHEREAS. Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of voting for those candidates
who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment:
WHEREAS. Earth Day 1990 will educate all citizens on the importance of supporting the passage of
legislation that will help protect the environment:
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that designate and proclaim April 22. 1990
as Earth Day 1990, and that that day shall be set aside for public activities promoting presexvation of
the global environment and launching the "Decade of the Environment".
@
Printed on Recycled Paper
~~n
-~..
Earth Day Co-chairs
Governor Rudy Perpich
Senator David Durenberger
Dear Minnesota Mayor:
TH DAY 1990
10329: Minneapolis. Minnesota 55458-3329
(612) 627-4049
Resolution Committee Co-chairs
Attorney Gen. Hubert H. Humphrey III
U. S. Congressman Vin Weber
February 21. 1990
Earth Day 1990 presents a u que opportunity to focus public attention on resolVing our
environmental problems. The Minn sota Earth Day 1990 Advisory Committee. composed of leaders
from business. environmental and g vernment organizations. is helping to design a series of
activities and events that will increase public understanding of environmental problems and the ways
these problems can be resolved. !
One of the guiding principles fEarth Day 1990 is inclusiveness. Regardless of what city. state
or nation we-reside in. we all share p anet Earth as our home. The goal of Earth Day 1990 is to raise
the level of public awareness about 0 r environment and to educate people about actions they can take
on behalf of the environment. Earth Day 1990 is the ultimate expression of the phrase "think
globally; act locally". Earth Day 19 0 will be the product of a huge coalition ofloosely affiliated
organizations. reaching far beyond ting environmental constituencies to involve the broadest
possible cross section of participant . Around the world. across America. and here in Minnesota.
individuals and groups are already lanning activities and events to celebrate Earth Day.
As co-chairpersons of the
join elected officials in local jurisdi
resolution enclosed with this letter.
as an environmental leader among
esota Earth Day 1990 Resolutions Committee. we urge you to
ons across America in passing resolutions like the sample
ith your help we can demonstrate why Minnesota is recognized
estates.
Finally. after your organizati n has passed the resolution. we request that you send a copy to
us in care of Minnesota Earth Day 1 90. P.O. Box 10329. Minneapolis. MN 55458-3329. On behalf of
Minnesota Earth Day 1990. we woul like to thank you for your help in making Earth Day in
Minnesota a great success!
Sincerely.
~~~~~~~
HUBERT H. HUMPHREY. III
Attorney General
Ene.
~~~~
@
Prin"'<i on Recycled Paper
e
e
e
..
.)
e
r illwater
"~ - . ~
......... -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DATE: MARCH 27, 1990
SUBJECT: HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STILLWATER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
BACKGROUND:
School District #834 has been working on plans for location of a new high
school facility in the area. During discussions with City Staff, the
historical significance of the existing Junior High School was mentioned. The
Heritage Preservation Commission was then requested to review the structure
and comment on its historical significance. The following is a brief overview
of the East and West Wings of the Junior High School.
~ HISTORICAL OVERVIEW:
The 'Stillwater Junior High School (West Wing c.a. 1923, East Wing c.a. 1939)
is a combination of structures built on the East and West corners of Pine and
Third Streets. Schools have been located on these sites since the Central
Building (East side) was constructed in 1869 and the first High School (West
side) was constructed in 1887. The two brick structures which make up the
Junior High School today, the old Baptist Church, and the various homes that
face one another, create a plaza area of which the Historic Courthouse (c.a.
1867) is the focal point. This formal layout is characteristic of'the
development of communities around the turn of the century.
e
The West Wing (Tozer addition) facades have not been altered to a great
extent. The new wi ndows have been the most dramatic change to the exteri or of
these buildings. The architectural features of this building include the
strong elements of brick and concrete characteristic of sporting facilities
built during the 1920's. One may find examples of this building across the
Midwest. An interesting point about the Tozer facility is that it was
constructed from a donation left to the City by Fred M. Tozer. The Tozer
family made their fortunes from the lumbering industry in Stillwater. The
interior of the West Wing has been dramatically altered which has changed the
original character. The auditorium is broken into various classrooms and a
sporting facility. The mural painted in this auditorium as a WPA project in
1937 has been painted over and the original architectural treatments and
seating have been removed. The gymnasium balcony has also been altered in
order to provide classroom space.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
e
e
...
;.
The East Wing of the Junior High School is an example of schools built during
that period. The lineal movement of the molded and concrete, and lead glass
detailing around the East and West entrances are distinct examples of the Art
Deco era. The interior of the East Wing has interesting features which include
natural woodwork and distinct tile treatments in the floors and walls.
The most interesting, and maybe most historic features, of the whole Junior
High complex are the old boilers. These boilers have interesting cast iron
fronts and are quite rare today. It has been stated that these boilers could
have been taken from the old Territorial Prison. Further research should be
conducted on these boilers.
CONCLUSION:
The Heri tage Preservati on Commi ssi on wi 11 be sendi ng a memo to Mr. Wettergren,
Superintendent, School District #834, on this historical overview along with a
suggestion that a reuse study be conducted of the facility. The Minnesota
Preservation Commission Consultation Team, developed by the Preservation
Alliance of Minnesota and the Minnesota Historical Society, is one such public
professional organization that consults communities in the State who are in
need of professional help in determining the feasibility of reuse of
threatened historic buildings.
e
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 8264
e
Amdahl, Chris
American Heat
American Linen
A.M. Leonard, Inc.
Armstrong Medical
AT & T
Balton, Dorthea
Capitol Communication
Cutco Company
Century Power Equipment
Clareys Safety Equipment
Comm of Transportation
Deblon, Diane
Duro-Test
Ecolab Pest
Frito-Lay, Inc.
Fritz Co., Inc.
Greeder Electric
Grindstone
G & K Services
Hardware Hank
Hoffman Refrigeration
IPMA-Minnesota
JH Larson
Johnson, Mary Lou
Kimball Midwest
Lawson Products
Lily Lake Imprest
Magnuson, David T.
McGladrey & Pullen
Meyer Sewer System
Mid-Central, Inc.
Minnesota Blueprint
Minnesota Cellular One
Minnesota City Mgt. Assn.
Minnesota Conway
Minnesota State Sheriffs Assn.
Muncilite Co.
Northern States Power
Northern States Power
Ness, George
Northern
Pepsi Cola
R & R Specialties
Rivard, Joe
River City Beverage
Rose Floral
st. Croix Cleaners
SEH
e
Sorensen, Rene
Lock Repair
VHS Tape Program
Linen Service
Seed Netting
Resusci Supplies
Long Distance
Flood Cleanup
Maintenance & Repair
Hydraulic Fittings
Power Mowers & Blades
Helmet Fronts & Backs
Relamp 36 and Main
Health Insurance
Florescent Lighting
March Services
Lily Lake Concessions
Lily Lake Consessions
Photo Eye Light
Knife Sharpening
Mops, rugs, Uniform Rental
Lock, shelves & brackets
Flood Draining
Membership dues
Lights & lamps, Lily Lake
Bemidji, seminar costs
Nuts & Bolts
Parts- City Garage
Concesion Purchases
Attorney Fees
1989 Audit
Pump Lift station
Milwaukee Strap
Kroy Cartridges
Mobile Phone Service
Membership Dues
SCBA Tests
Membership Dues
Strobe & Directional Lights
City Gas & Electric
street lighting
Ice Rescue Registration fee
Trash Pump
Lily Lake Concession
Cylinder Head
Tow straps & Crevices
Lily Lake Juice Concession
Shelton - flowers
Fire Dept. Laundry
L.I. 257 Feasibility,
L.1. 251 Specs
Skate Instructor
42.00
698.00
16.60
81.47
87.97
2.15
91. 00
477.50
20.76
1,131.90
125.80
150.53
197.39
346. 72
185.00
194.30
583.20
554.40
60.00
832.38
136.76
156.00
15.00
1,859.62
165.85
72 . 04
375.42
153.76
6,531.20
4,100.00
191. 25
69.00
25.00
7.35
40.00
410.00
20.00
549.50
10,914.45
9,018.24
90.00
458.99
361.00
802.05
140.00
176.00
55.00
12.35
13,990.90
150.00
stillwater Book
StillH20 Septic
Tastee Baking Company
Thompson Hardware
Tower Asphalt
Uniforms Unlimited
UBC
Valley Auto Supply
Valley Trophy
Wholesale Club
Wybrite, Inc.
Yocum, Oil
Office Supplies
Pump Basement
Lily Lake Concessions
Parts & Supplies
Blacktop
2 siren controls & uniforms
Shelf & Brackets
Pars, Alternator, Batteries, Etc.
Plaque, Parks Dept.
Membership Dues
Maintenance Agreement
Gas & Fuel Oil
109.32
450.00
218.80
226.89
285.66
1,792.01
14.87
358.19
66.32
25.00
88.00
915.94
e
Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of April 1990.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
e
e
e
e
e
Landry's Landscaping
1937 No. County Road I
Somerset, Wi 54025
Krugmire Carpentry
5721 Grand Ave. So.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55419
CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS
April 3, 1990
Landscapers
General Contractor
Renewal
New
~
~
f
....:
Legislative
Contact
aS$ociation of
metropolitan
municipalities
March 29, 1990
Alert Number 3
Alert
TO:
AMM Legislative Contacts
FROM:
Vern Peterson, Executive Director
Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs
RE:
HOUSE AND SENATE OMNIBUS TAX BILLS PUNITIVE TO CITIES
As of this date, the House Omnibus Tax Bill (HF 2478) has received
final approval and is waiting to be conferred. The Senate Omnibus
Tax Bill (SF 2540) is scheduled to be debated and approved on the
Senate Floor on Friday, March 30th. . and the Tax Conference
Committee will likely start meeting seriously on Monday, April 2nd.
Both tax bills have provisions which are very harmful to all
cities in general including AMM Member cities. The following is a
brief summary of the key provisions of these bills concerning TIF,
Levy Limits, Municipal Aid, and HACA cuts which are most punitive
and harmful from our perspective.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCE (TIF):
The Senate bill contains no provisions on TIF. We are very pleased
that no TIF provisions were included in the Senate bill and this
should be of help during conference committee debate.
Unfortunately, HF 2478 contains many restrictive TIF provisions
which we oppose. We have reported and described these provisions
previously but the following is a summary of the more onerous
provisions still remaining in the bill:
-HACA/LGA cuts will reduce increments by approximately one-third
(does not effect existing districts). \
-Volume Caps are imposed and many AMM cities already exceed those
caps including Chanhassen, Chaska, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins,
Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Newport, Plymouth, Roseville, Shakopee,
Spring Park, and Wayzata.
-New Blight test imposed which states a building is not substandard
if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new
building or could be modified to satisfy the code at a cost of less
than 15% of constructing a new structure of the same size and type.
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
-1-
~;r
~
010
'../
~.
~
~'
.
~
-Requires that
increments may
ies acquired with revenues derived from tax
sold for less than fair market value.
-Severly restricts economic development districts and essentially
prohibits using this ype of TIF district for retail.
-Allows for a reverse referendum on newly created districts.
Housing districts are not subject to this provision.
-Adds new redevelopm nt criteria and redevelopment project areas
would have to meet t 0 of the following three provisions:
*Market value of pro
previous 5 years.
has declined by 5% or more during the
*A substantial porti
residential units a
units are in buildi
test' .
n of the buildings in the area contain
d that at least five percent of the housing
gs that meet the new 'substandard building
*The area is charact rized by one or more of the following:
excessive vacant la ds on which buildings had once been located,
vacant buildings, s bstandard buildings and structures or ~
delinquent property tax payments.
A lot of 'work' is n eded so that many if not all of these
provisions can be el'minated or modified in Conference Committee
discussions. YOUR H LP IS DESPERATELY NEEDED!
SENATE TAX BILL CAR
MAJOR CHUNK FROM AIDS AND LEVY BASE
The Senate x Bill includes a provision cutting LGA/HACA
in 1990 by the city/county (Levy Limit + LGA +
Equal. Aid + Special Levy + Bonded Debt) Base. This amount
will be subtracted f om the current 1990 Levy Limit Base
(LGA + Eq. Aid + evy) and thus will be lost for future years.
The 1990 LGA/HACA I vy base reductions are listed on the
attachment. The tot I city/county reduction for 1990 is
$43 million.
1991 levy limits wil be calculated using the normal 3% plus
one-half growth usin the reduced 1990 Levy Limit Base. However,
an additional LGA an Levy Base reduction will be calculated.
Step one is the grea er of .8% of 1990 LGA + Eq. Aid or a
recalculation of LGA without the grandfather element and limited to
a 2.4% tax rate incr ase. Step two adds the results of step one to
the amount of LGA in rease that a city would have received in 1991
under the 1989 tax b'll and then reduces the cities LGA and Levy ~
base by this amount hich in many cases is larger than the initial
(levy + growth) base increase. The amounts of this calculation are
-2-
.Ji1!f' .' ..~
e
shown in the attached list as 1991 LGA/Levy Base reductions.
The total Senate Tax Bill cut equals the LGA/HACA cut for 1990 plus
the LGA cut for 1991 all of which reduces the Levy Base and cannot
be levied in the future until levy limits are repealed. In
addition, the Levy Limit repealer was extended one year so that these
cuts would be more permanent.
HOUSE TAX BILL TOUGH ON TIF BUT PALATABLE ON LGA AND BASE CUTS
The House Tax Bill cuts the 1990 Levy/Aid base as listed on the
attachment by approximately .6% or $13 million compared to the
Senate $43 million and the Governor's $66 million. The cut becomes
permanent and cannot be recaptured in 1991. LGA and HACA increases
are scaled back for 1991 but no further Levy Base reductions are
included. From a metropolitan perspective outside of TIF which was
discussed previously, the other bad provision is reinstatement of
a Tax Base Equalization formula funded at the relatively small
amount of $1.5 million increase per year for 1991 and 1992. The
Senate Tax Bill does not contain any Tax Base Equalization.
MESSAGE FOR LEGISLATORS:
~
-Totally reject Senate aid and base cuts for 1990 and especially
1991 as unnecessary and punitive .
-Change the House Tax Base Equalization (TBE) formula to provide
increased funding only to C/I property tax relief. It currently is
applied as relief to all types of property. Since most of the TBE
aid goes to outstate cities but the net tax problem is really
limited to C/I, then by targeting TBE to C/I, less state aid is
needed to solve the problem.
-Additional TIF restrictions are not needed this year. The changes
made in 1988 and 1989 were substantial and their full impact has
not had time to work as yet.
ACTION NEEDED IMMEDIATELY:
Please contact your legislators now and discuss these concerns with
them. Ask them to put pressure on the Conference Committee
members. The conferees have not been appointed as yet but our
best guesses are as follows: Senate Conferees: Doug Johnson,
Steve Novak, Larry pogemiller, Peter Stumpf and John Brandl or John
Bernhagen. House Conferees: Paul Ogren, Ann Rest, Edgar Olson,
Bob Vanasek, Dee Long or Peter McLaughlin. Allen Welle is also
a possibility.
e
In any case the Conferees will probably be appointed on Friday.
-3-
e
HOTEL/MOTEL 3 % SALES
The House Tax Bill el'minates the ability of a city to levy the
second 3% hotel/motel tax for general fund receipts. The initial
3% for tourism is sti I available. Any city which has levied the
second three percent ill lose it at the end of 1992 coinciding
with the repeal of Ie y limits. The Senate has a 3% hotel/motel
elimination bill on tre floor.
PAY EQUITY (HF 1198/Sr 488)
The Senate has passed its pay equity bill and the House bill is on
the floor. For a bri f time the House Bill contained a 2% of
payroll special levy ut it was wiped out in House Tax Committee.
The two bills are ver similar.
The main provision is a change in the definition of equitable
compensation to - - - 'Equitable Compensation relationship means
that the compensation for female-dominated classes is not
consistently below th compensation for male-dominated classes of
comparable work value, as determined under section 471.994, within
the political subdivision'.
It also includes several other changes including a report, an e
expansion of the penalty provision for units without LGA or HACA, a
list of reasons for ot being in compliance (recruitment/retention
difficulties, recent inconsistent arbitration, and good faith effort
toward compliance), an administrative appeal, and a delay in penalty
until the legislatur has met to consider the compliance report
prepared by DOER.
~
-4-
.
f
e
HOUSE/SENATE - AID AND LEVY BASE REDUCTIONS
The listing on the following pages compares the difference in the
House Tax Bill HF 2478 and the Senate Tax Bill SF 2540 for Aid and
Levy Base reductions for 1990 and 1991.
-Col. 1 The Base that the aid and levy base cuts are calculated
on. It equals the payable 1990 property tax levy for
general government, bonded debt, and other special levies
plus certified LGA, Tax Base Equalization Aid, Disparity
Aid, and Taconite Aid. HACA is included as part of the
certified general government levy.
-Col. 2. House bill cut to 1990 aid and permanent levy base
reduction equals .6% of the expanded levy base in Column
1. The cut will be taken from LGA. However, if a city
does not receive enough LGA, then the cut will be taken from
HACA.
~
-Col. 3 Senate bill cut to 1990 aid and permanent levy base
reduction equals 2.11% of the expanded levy base in Column
1. The cuts will be made to LGA and then HACA if there is
insufficient LGA.
-Col. 4 Senate bill cut to 1991 LGA and permanent levy base
reduction. This levy base reduction is in addition to the
permanent base reduction in Column 3. It equals the
amount of LGA a city would have received in 1991 per the
1989 tax bill plus a further reduction to the actual 1990
LGA after 1990 reductions. If a city does not currently
receive LGA, there is no further aid or levy base reduction
in 1991.
Note: The Levy Base reduction cannot be recaptured through levy until
such time as Chapter 275.50 levy limits would be repealed. Both
tax bills delay the repeal by one year so levy limits remain in
place through 1992.
~
-5-
199 b CITY HOUSE SENATE
LE j'..7Y/AID 1990 CUT 1990 CUT 1991 CUT
+S IP.LEVY AID + AID + LGA +
LVY.BASE LVY.BASE LVY.BASE
.6% 2.11%
ANOKA 3. tl03.838 22.223 78.151 142,120
APPLE VALLEY 8. tL37,366 48.824 171. 698 248,984
ARDEN HILLS 1 ~41. 731 0 0 0
BAYPORT 860.599 5.164 18.159 67.062
I
BLAINE 6. 006.438 36.039 126.736 I 263.347
BLOOMINGTON 22. 571,535 135.429 476.259 0
BROOKLYN CENTER 7. 068.313 42.410 149.141 337 837
BROOKLYN PARK 11, 309.371 67.856 238 628 522.060
BURNSVILLE 12 013.447 72.081 253.484 I 527,881
I
CHAMPLIN 2 876.544 17,259 60.695 ! 118,048
CHANHASSEN 2 804.576 16.827 59.177 65.476
CHASKA 1 440.814 8 645 30.401 76.718
CIRCLE PINES . 872.249 5 233 18,404 I 61. 190
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 5 032.940 30.198 106.195 i 151. 071
COON RAPIDS 9 173.434 55.041 193.559 385,511
i
,
COTTAGE GROVE 5 384.776 32,309 113.619 I 347.823
1
CRYSTAL 5 429.789 32.579 114.569 I 205 707
I
DAYTON 749.562 4.497 15 816 I 28 080
DEEPHAVEN 925.201 5.551 19 522 0
EAGAN 9 725.012 58.350 205.198 0
EDEN PRAIRIE 11 858 400 71,150 250.212 0
EDINA 9 992.692 0 0 0
FALCON HEIGHTS 798.421 4 791 16.847 35.209
-6-
e
e
e
e
FRIDLEY 6.350,170 38.101 133 989 I 296.554
GOLDEN VALLEY 7.287,008 43.722 153.756 I 423 253
HASTINGS 4 429,456 26 577 93.462 195.025
HOPKINS 4.667.874 28.007 98.492 287.646
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 4.638,435 27.831 97.871 212.337
LAKEVILLE 5.272,220 31.633 111,244 187.232
MAHTOMEDI 1.150.455 6.903 24.275 89.125
MAPLE GROVE 7.320 283 43.922 154.458 286.475
MAPLEWOOD 7.398,827 44.393 156.115 679,399
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2.146,550 12.879 45 292 0
MINNEAPOLIS 185 289.601 1.111 738 3.90'9.611 5.975 079
MINNETONKA 12.325,561 73.953 260.069 I 0
OUND 1. 969.614 11.818 41.559 95.282
MOUNDS VIEW 2.036.566 12.219 42.972 94.907
NEW BRIGHTON 3.605 096 21.631 76.068 193.183
NEW HOPE 4.761,644 28.570 100.471 229,782
NEWPORT 1.026.932 6,162 21. 668 60.523
I
I
I
NORTH ST. PAUL 1 776,479 10 659 37.484 I 86 635
,
OAKDALE 3.414.285 20.486 72.041 147.203
ORONO 1.638,246 2.979 2.979 0
OSSEO 518.762 3.113 10.946 I 51.958
PLYMOUTH 9.275,300 55.652 195.709 I 0
PRIOR LAKE 2.662,369 15.974 56.176 88.449
RAMSEY 1.687.523 10.125 35 607 71.396
RICHFIELD 9 680,519 58 083 204.259 374 128
ROBBINS DALE 4.193.938 25,164 88.492 105,777
&
e
-7-
ROSEMOUNT 2 539,106 15,235 53,575 I 138,732
ROSEVILLE 6 651.237 39.907 140.341 I 304.608
ST. ANTHONY 1 708,662 10,252 36,053 84,919
I
ST. FRANCIS 414,156 2,485 8 739 I 20.957
I
ST. LOUIS PARK 13 333.848 80.003 281 344 I 633,260
ST. PAUL 118 729,395 712,376 2,505 190 13,222 528
I I
ST. PAUL PARK 1 106,681 6,640 23 351 60 097
SAVAGE 1 898.351 11,390 40.055 I 49 915
SHAKO PEE 2 457 103 14.743 51,845 242,108
SHOREVIEW 4 140 744 24,844 87,370 168,580
SHOREWOOD 1 684.576 10.107 35.545 0
SOUTH ST. PAUL 6 169.995 37 020 130,187 158,017
SPRING LAKE PARK 1 053,697 6,322 22,233 51, 089
SPRING PARK 499,997 3,000 10.550 5.315
STILLWATER 4 236.719 25.420 89.395 248,901
WAYZATA 1 510,787 9,065 31,878 0
WEST ST. PAUL 4 846.235 29.077 102.256 212,768
WOODBURY 4 686,301 28,118 98,881 208.493
WOODU.4ND 127.000 0 0 0
-8-
e
e
e
..
e
Sti llwater Pub 1 ic Li brary
223 N orth Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Board of Trustees
Minutes
February S. 1990
The regular monthly meeting of the Stillwater Public Library Board of Trustees was
held on Monday. February 5.1990.
Present: Hansen. Childs, Engebretson, Schmidt, Welshons, Anderson, Kalinoff, Casso
The meeting was called to order at 6:34 pm by President Hansen.
The agenda was adopted as amended to add items 3, 4, and 5 to New Business (see below).
The minutes were approved as published.
Payment of biHs in the amount of$6,419.39 ($423.68 from 1989) was approved.
There was a note of appreciation and cookies from Lori Zylla.
e
Com mittee Reports
1. Administration - none.
2, BudgetandFinance-none.
3. Building and Grounds - none.
4, Goals - Submitted Document B.
Motion adopted to accept recommended time line for adult programming:
May 1, 1990 - Complete proposal prepared, foundations identified
and contacted.
July L 1990 - Grant proposals presented to all funding sources,
September 15. 1990 - Review funding proposal responses.
January 1, 1991 - Commence adult programming.
(Note: This may need to be reconsidered per Hage,)
Motion adopted to eliminate collection assessment process previously
adopted.
Motion adopted to direct the Goals Committee to advise the Board by April
2, 1990 on the details of preparation and administration of a survey.
). Public Relations - Director will proceed with selected SPL stationery project.
6. Special Projects
Doll display gone.
Valentine display coming.
SPL will participate in 1990 Lumberjack Days.
7. WCL Liaison Report - given. no action needed,
e
to
e
Old Business
1. Yidcocasette Loan Policy - Adopte:d a policy that "StiHwau::r Public Library w111
make unrestricted loans of recreational video casettes to everyone twelve
years of age and older, Stillwater Public Library will make loans of
recreational video casettes to those under twelve years of age only with
written parental consent."
2. Video Viewing Policy - Adopted a policy that "Effective immediately Stillwater
Public Library will allow patrons to check out video tapes and VCR units and
to allow them to view those tapes as the Director designates."
3. Adult Programming - no action.
4. Margaret Rivers Foundation Grant - Discussed using these funds for
newsletter or collection development. No action.
New Business
1. Legislative Day - Will be held February 22,1990.
2. Motion approved to pay Rotary membership dues for Director.
3, Motion approved to allow Director to spend up to $50 of SPL funds for grand
opening gift for Bayport Public Library.
4, Motion approved to set Director's salary at $46.200 for 1990.
5. Proposal to establish policy on sexual harassment referred to Administration
Committee.
President's Report was presented.
Director's Report was received and discussed.
e
Betsy Hage of Hage Research Works presented a Member Education program on
Foundations and Private Funding with special emphasis on libraries. (Attachment A)
In the Q&A session following, it appears that the time line approved for Adult
Programming (above) is overly optimistic.
Adjourned 9:27 pm for Annual Meeting.
Submitted:
W. Yes Childs
Acting Secretary
corrected 3/5/90 wvc
e
e
Stillwater Public Library
223 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Board of Trustees
Minutes
February S, 1990
The regular annual meeting of the Stillwater Public Library Board of Trustees was held
on Monday, February), 1990.
Present: Hansen, Childs, Engebretson, Schmidt, Welshans, Anderson, Kalinoff. Casso
The meeting was called to order at 9:28 pm by President Hansen.
The minutes of the annual meeting for 1989, held February 6, 1989.. were approved as
published.
Don Hansen was ejected President for a two year term,
Gregg Schmidt was elected Vice-President for a two year term.
e
Ves Childs was elected Secretary for a two year term,
Committee appointments will be published separately.
Adjourned 9:33 pm,
Submittted:
W, Ves Childs
Secretary
corrected 3/5/90 wvc
e
'?'Y ?W/7 Cr'/
e
Stillwater Public Library
223 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Board of Trustees
Minutes
March S. 1990
The regular monthly meeting of the Stillwater Public Library Board of Trustees was
held on Monday, March 5,1990.
Present: Childs, Engebretson, Schmidt, Welshons, Doe.
e
1. The meeting was called to order at 6:34 pm by vice-President Schmidt.
2. The agenda was adopted as published.
3. The minutes were approved as corrected by adding "s" to Welsh on "
4. Payment of bills in the amount of $4,099.51 was approved.
5. Committee Reports-
Adainbtration - No action; will meet in March to review sexual harassment
policy.
Budlet and Finance - no action.. some discussion about printouts from City.
Buildinl and Grounds - no action; some discussion about protection of new
plantings and lights.
Goals - Did not meet in February. Should meet to review survey especially
about user satisfaction. Recommendation requested by May meeting.
Public Relation.s - Did not meet in February. Working on brochure for new
parents. Will meet.
Special Projects - Did not meet in February. Chair is working on "Gaviidae"
loon floats for Lumberjack Days parade. Bayport Library opening is Apri118.
yeL Liaison. Report - given, no action needed. Noted proposed hardware
update for computer equipment.
e
6. Old Business
A. MargeretRiversfoundation Grant- See 7,D.A. below.
B. Adult Programming - Director reported on information from Betsy Hage.
C. Legislative Day Report - By Welshons; some concern about budget shortfall at
state level. Impact on SPL will not be direct.
D. Air Conditioning/Humidification - Hope to solve the problem by opening up
circulation and running colder. Might save $3600.
E. Lead Circulation Worker -
Motion to establish at Library Assistant II level. m/s/p
Director has chosen Jean Dupslaff for position.
Motion to start her at 10 year point. m/s/p
F. Union Settlement-
Motion to adopt Document A (attached), m/s/p
Motion to adopt 1990 salary schedule (attached). m/s/p
G. Non-union staff wages -
Motion to adopt proposed wage scale shown in Document B. m/s/p
H. Human Sexuality Awareness Coalition Video ProPosal-
Document C reviewed and clarification requested for April.
I. Other - None.
7, New Business-
A. Board Education 1an-
Day - to - da funding
Censorship
Circulation
B. Relea.."'C 120 Imp ementation -
. WCLandDy ixdiscussingnextupgrade.
Not likely at SPL will get some of its wants.
C. White House Con erence and Governors Preconference-
Noted and d' cussed Delegat.e Nomination Form.
D. Macintosh for base programming -
Motion to c nsider use of MRF funds (above) for this. m/s/p
Director w' bring recommendations.
E. Other - none.
8, President's Report - giv n.
9. Director's and other sta f reports - received,
10. Adjournment - 8:-49
e
President's Report was presented.
Director's Report was r ceived and discussed.
Submitted:
W. Yes Childs
Secretary
e
e
-
MWC€Bulletin
..1111gif@llHgiM&rH)J~i1tmi~~M@~MlIiHgiUmHlimgMll1t.jit=&tfit1Imillf11llii!llfiiWlUftiM
News from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Judy Fletcher
Precinct B
Commissioner
.
The MWCC is
responsible for efficient
collection and treatment
of wastewater in the
Twin Cities metro area.
The MWCC serves 105
communities and treats
more than 275 million
gallons of wastewater
perday. Policies are set
by a board of
commissioners who
_ represent geographic
.. precincts throughout the
seven-county metro area.
1989 was busy year for MWCC
A message from Precinct B Commissioner Judy Fletcher
The past year was a busy one for the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission.
We moved forward on many specific initia-
tives to improve our level of wastewater
treatment and service while holding rates
well below the national average.
In response to public demand and more'
strict discharge standards, we are currently
upgrading several of our 11 plants - includ-
ing the plant at Stillwater. Weare im-
plementing improvements at plants where
odor concerns have been raisedby neigh-
bors. Additionally, weare planning for
emerging issues of toxics control, sludge
management, groundwater infiltration and
inflow, metering accuracy and non-point
source pollution. Afew of these topics are
briefly outlined in this newsletter.
As your MWCC representative. I invite your
comments as we look ahead to new levels of
environmental awareness and protection in
the future. If you have any questions or con-
cerns, please don't hesitate to call me at my
office 770-4624 or at my home m-9606.
General Advisory Committee offers more access
In order to provide a direct channel for com-
munity input to the Commission, the
MWCC will have a new General Advisory
Committee.
The 25-member advisory board will advise
MWCC Commissioners about issues related to
thewastewater industry. Memberswill be
- ..chosen from among candidateS-nOminated by
area cities, industry and public interest groups.
Members will include elected municipal
government, municipal staff, industry and en-
vironmental groups. Priority areas for further
study include MWCC's budget, water quality
issues, public communication and public educa-
tion. The committee will also serve as another
channel for communication from MWCC
Commissioners-to therr resident communities.
20-year plan is a blueprint for long-range goals
Complying with a new legislative act, the
MWCC recently completed a 200-page
. strategic planning document that will
serve as a blueprint for short and long-range
goals.
The Commission's "Wastewater Treabnent and
Handling Implementation Plan, 1990-2010,"
delineates issues affecting the wastewater in-
dustry and MWCC's programs to handle them.
The plan notes major trends in wastewater
treabnent technology, environmental protec-
tion, public expectation, system-wide improve-
ments and maintenance, budget and fmancial
considerations, and other topics. The plan will
be reviewed and revised as necessary every
two years.
Although we've had long-range planning goals
for many years, this Implementation Plan is the
fll'St comprehensive look at the many inter-
related issues we'll be facing in the next two
decades. In addition to serving the Commis-
sion, the plan will also benefit the entire metro
area through better planning for a more cost ef-
ficient and effective treabnent system.
More news on page two
'?- \~~U
ft?~.
Metro sewer ratesl~pro below nat~onal average
Despite increasingly strict water dis-
charge standards and rising treat-
ment costs, sewage rates in the
Twin Cities are still well below the na-
tional average -- 20 percent less, in fact.
when compared with cities of similar size.
Why are our rates lower than average'!
It's because the Commission acted
promptly in the 1970s and '80s and was
Commission news
The Commission is working on a number
of issues affecting residents in Precinct B:
· The MWCC approved a "Memoran-
dum of Understanding" with the
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR), Northern States
Power Company, City of Stillwater
and City of Oak Park Heights to
site a boat launch on the SL Croix
River adjacent to the Stillwater
Wastewater Treatment PlanL This
joint action allows the DNR to
MWCC
Precinct B
Arden Hills, Birchwood,
Centerville, Falcon
Heights, Forest lake,
Forest. lake Township,
Gem lake, Hugo,
lauderdale,lino lakes,
little Canada,
Mahtomedi, Maplewood,
Moundsview, New
Brighton, North Oaks,
North St.Paul, Roseville,
51. Anthony, Shoreview,
Stillwater, Stillwater
Township, Vadnais
Heights, White Bear
lake, White Bear lake
Township, Willemie
suc~sSful in obtaining millions of dollars
wo~ of federal grants and low-interest
I s to upgrade and improve our treat-
me t system. Those federal dollars are
go now and we were forced to increase
our rates slightly this year. But we are in
g shape heading into the '90s with a
sou d infrastructure and stable fInances -
un e the bleak picture facing other
citi s like New York and Boston.
~~
",.
Remember, too, the level of service '.
metro households get for an average cost
of $10 per month. Compare that, for ex-
ample, to the average residential electric
bill of $23 per month.
""".
e
MWCC is commited to quality service to
our users and to protecting the environ-
ment That's a challenge we all face
together.
Precinct B
· An agreement was authorized with
L&G Rehbein of Hugo, Minn., to
recycle incinerated sewage sludge
ash as a soil conditioner and fer-
tilizer by mixing it with lime
sludge from local water treatment
. plants.
· Design work has begun on the
Stillwater plant upgrade and odor
control improvements. Project con-
struction will be advertised for bids
this spring.
e
HDl SCANDIA
. IRCHWOOD
.,J ~I
.
W:ILLERN:IE
For more Information call t e Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, 229-2129
e
LINO LAKES I MARINE
~ CENTERVILLE MAY
WASHINGTON COUNTY
HUGO I
'. "1fOUNDS VIEV \ '~
. . . Ut'\RTB OAKS :.--1
Ir"l SHOREVUW >. I ..s-.... _
NEWBRIGmuN GEM LAKE'~TE BEAR.LAKE
so:. ANTHONY I I VADNAIS EIGHTS :(J
I ARDEN HILLS~~ '-I I GRANT
EY COUNTY' . ~"I '2
-wi. ROSEVlLLE -L N<?RTB ST. PAUL
LAUDERDALE MAPLEWOOD
FALCON HEIGHTS
LI'r'rLE CANADA
proceed with design, funding and
land acquisition for the proposed
projecL A small portion of MWCC
land will be conveyed to the DNR
to provide access to the site.
· The Commission has begun a com-
prehensive study into "groundwater
infiltration and inflow" (1&1) into
the interceptor system. By reducing
I&I, the flow within the system
will drop and many communities
will save money.
vol
----
~
-............
"'"
t.
e
\J\1
~
1(':
Ill)
fJ
~
(\\
f1
W
\.
..J.}
l
~S\
C>
c
r
(J
'-.:' -
-
('J ..
"
(- w
0 \)
-J -
l)
N -
.
e
e
If\
....
-\
fi1
\}
r
):>
l.
~
o
-J
V-( z:
\)
f1
-\ -
.:r.
- I "Z.8'
10' I. ['}
co
'- I 1 0-
j" 5b'
.,;::.1..:-....:__.'.~~;~: _ ~~_~;~ J__ -. -~-- ,-
z
, 111
I D I f=.
~~
N
~
...t>
"-
-
I
!
l~
I
i !:-
>
fl. .
? \
0-
r\
-
"
I
I
~ I
I
-- I
< i
I
(1j I
~ i
;
\
\
/00. 'Z'Z '
I~
U'\
,-
"'?".~" te.._......"'.... ~...__,,~ ;::-.
'Z e J_-
,!~
~
~
34'
"
r -----~-r
! ~ I
'. 1..
I ~ ~
I \jl I
-~--- -- to.-t
-
~
-1)
.
00
..
SO. \"Z. I
,.
50./3'.
G 1--'12 I vE G"-,,,-,,11'-1 Uv~ TI 0 Ie>
o~ ___~_~~-~_EI ______________ .