Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990-02-06 CC Packet
AGENDA STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL February 6, 1990 REGULAR MEETING 4:30 P.M. RECESSED MEETING 7:00 P.M. 4:30 P.M. AGENDA STAFF REPORTS 1. Finance Director 4. Comm. Dev. Director 7. Fire Chief 2. Public Safety 5. Parks & Recreation 8. City Attorney 3. Public Works Dir. 6. Consulting Engineer 9. City Clerk 10. City Coordinator 7 :00 P.M. AGENDA CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Special Meeting - January 9, 1990 Regular Meeting - January 16, 1990 INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS 1. Tram 250 Bike Race Presentation. 2. Tom Hay - Update on Oak Glen Golf Course. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider the request of Eileen V. Meister for a transfer of an Off -Sale Liquor License for a liquor store facility located at 117 West Churchill St. Notice of the Hearing was published in The Courier on January 25, 1990. 2. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on the West Stillwater Business Park Plan, a component of the City Comprehensive Plan, which includes the lands between So. Greeley St. on the east and Long Lake on the west, Highway 36 on the south and W. Orleans and Benson Farm lands on the north. Notice of the Hearing was published in The Courier on January 25, 1990 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. 3. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider modification of a previously approved PUD for a 56 -unit townhouse apartment complex, retail development and office building, to preliminary plat approval for a multi- family residential PUD consisting of 14 six -plex condominium units at the northeast corner of Highway 5 & Orleans St. in the RA, Single - Family Residential Dist., Heritage Development Corp., Applicant. Case No. PUD/89 -82. Notice of the Hearing was published in The Courier on-January 25, 1990 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. 1 4. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing to consider a Resubdivision request for Block 1, the Cottages of Stillwater, from three lots to sixteen lots at the northeast corner of Highway 5 and Orleans St. in the RA, Single - Family Residential Dist., Heritage Development Corp., Applicant. Case No. SU3/89 -83. Notice of the Hearing was published in The Courier on January 25, 1990 and mailed to affected property owners. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Request for extension of time limits to connect Overlook Inn, 210 E. Laurel St. to City sewer line. 2. Request for Variance to the State Standards for location of an on -site sanitary sewer system for Lot 8, Block 1, Browns Creek Heights Subdivision, Tor Hansen, owner. 3. Authorization to issue Certificate of Completion for INCSTAR office building located at 1951 Northwestern Ave. 4. Possible second reading of the Noise Ordinance. 5. Feasibility Report for L.I. 262, Krogstad property. NEW BUSINESS 1. Possible first reading of an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance by modifying the procedure for design review in the Downtown Area. 2. Designation of Delegate to EMS Council. 3. Landowner's Bill of Rights for DNR Boat Access. PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS & DELEGATIONS (continued) CONSENT AGENDA 1. Resolution Directing Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8238). 2. Applications (list to be supplied at meeting) 3. Submission of claim to City's Insurance Agent regarding an incident at Northland Park. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS STAFF REPORTS (continued) COMMUNICATIONS /FYI 1. Application for MWCC General Advisory Committee Appointment. 2. Letter from Susan Supira - Resignation from Park & Recreation Commission. 3. Letter of application from Harry Peterson for Port Authority appointment. QUESTIONS /COMMENTS FROM NEWS MEDIA ADJOURNMENT 9 • STAFF REQUEST ITEM D EPARTMENT Fire Department MEETING DATE . ebruary. 1,99.0, DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is) Leslie Wardell, Cram Crea and Duane Maciejhav_e_L mpLe.ted thei r.._6_,month_ probationary p rind. I am, re gat, permi si ca t y _ e installed on a part -paid full time basis. • FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request) No increase in pay ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED YES NO x ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. SUBMITTED BY 2 04J_ DATE February 1, 1990 • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FR: Downtown Plan Action Committee DA: February 6, 1990 RE: WORKSHOP ON DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PLANS The Downtown Plan Action Committee has completed work in the Downtown Capital Improvement Program and Financing Plan. Sewers have been televised, utility lines checked and contacts with MnDot for financial support made. The Committee would like a workshop to present the improvement program to the City Council and receive Council comments and blessing before presenting the program to City residents and downtown property owners. The Committee suggests possible meeting dates of Thursday, February 22 or March 1, 1990. • ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. January 30, 1990 Mr. Nile Kriesel City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Nile: BCP /cih Enclosure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490 -2000 ST PAUL, MINNESOTA RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SUNSET RIDGE ESTATES CITY PROJECT NO. L.I. 255 SEH FILE NO: 89141 Attached are two copies of the fourth and final application for payment from Volk Sewer and Water, Inc., in the amount of $8,991.36. We have reviewed the application and have determined it to be correct. We reviewed the project with representatives of the City and, to the best of our knowledge, find the project was constructed in accordance with the intent of the plans and specifications. We recommend that the project be accepted by the City for maintenance and recommend payment of the application. Sincerely, Barry C. Peters, P.E. 3 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN LOCATION: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA ,PPLIC.DATE '•OD END. DESCRIPTION BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55428 1/12/90 1/12/90 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT (UNIT PRICE CONTRACT) NO. 4 (FINAL) :ONTRACTOR VOLK SEWER AND WATER, INC. CONTRACT DATE ►WNER: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO. L.I. 255 -- . ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 89141 8909 BASS CREEK COURT CONTRACT AMOUNT $119,917.29 :ONTR. FOR SUNSET RIDGE ESTATES, SAN. SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, STREETS APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL SANITARY SEWER CUT INTO EXISTING MH EACH 1 1 100.00 $ 100.00 8" PVC, 0' -8' DEEP L.F. 203 380 9. $ 3,420.00 8" PVC, 8' -10' DEEP L.F. 100 195 9.00 $ 1,755.00 8" PVC, 10'- 12'DEEP L.F. 1050 1039 11.00 $11,429.00 STD MANHOLE, 8' DEEP EACH 6 6 750.00 $ 4,500.00 EXCESS DEPTH STD MANHOLE L.F. 16.43 21.81 55.00 $ 1,199.55 8" BY 4" PVC WYE EACH 19 19 14.00 $ 266.00 III 4" PVC SERVICE L.F. 600 655 4.00 $ 2,620.00 AGE 1 OF 4 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 9 ROCK PIPE SUBGRADE TON 100 0.01 $ BACKFILL WATERMAIN 10 CONNECT TO EX. 12" STUB EACH 1 1 250.00 $ 250.00 11 6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F. 50 30 11.00 $ 330.00 12 8" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F. 940 943 11.47 $10,816_._21 13 12" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 L.F. 460 453 17.90 $ 8,108.70 14 6" R.S.GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3 3 300.00 $ 900.00 15 8" R.S.GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 3 3 420.00 $ 1,260.00 16 12" B.F.VALVE & BOX EACH 2 2 700.00 $ 1,400.00 17 FIRE HYDRANT EACH 3 3 950.00 $ 2,850.00 18 DIP FITTINGS LB. 566 663 1.00 $ 663.00 19 1" CORPORATION EACH 19 19 75.00 $ 1,425.00 20 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH 19 19 75.00 $ 1,425.00 1" COPPER SERVICE L.F. 600 704.5 5.00 $ 3,522.50 22 ROCK PIPE SUBGRADE TON 75 0.01 $ BACKFILL STORM SEWER 23 12" RCP STORM SEWER, L.F. 653 661 15.80 $1_1.443.80 CL V' 24 21" RCP STORM SEWER, L.F. 60 48 20.03 $ 961.44 CL III 25 12" R.C. APRON W /TRASH EACH 1 1 300.00 $ 300.00 GUARD , 26 21" R.C. APRON W /TRASH EACH 2 2 525.00 $ 1,050.00 GUARD 27 MANHOLE, TYPE B L.F. 6.96 7.2_ 93.40 $ 672.4$ 28 CATCH BASIN, TYPE X L.F. 6 6.3 150.00 $ 945.00 29 CATCH BASIN, TYPE Y L.F. 3.51 3.8 170.94 $ 649.57 1 10 R 1733 MH CASTING EACH 1 1 145.00 $ 145.00 PAGE 2 OF 4 SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. 1 R 3067 CB CASTING EACH 4 4 195.00 $ 780.00 210 HANDPLACED RIPRAP W/ C.Y. 6.6 6.6 r 49.00 $ 323.40 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 4 3 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE TON 100 0.01 $ SUBGRADE BACKFILL ROADWAY .4 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. 950 1,gn0 1.50 $ 5,850.00 18 REPLACEMENT BACKFILL TON 100 0.01 $ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) C.Y. 438 8.16 $ 0 AGG. BASE CL. 5 100% TON 1 7501,622.5 7.78 $12,623.05 CRUSHED 1 BIT MATL FOR MIXTURE TON 51 52.81 132.60 $ 7,002.61 2 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 437 521.35 13.87 $ 7,231.12 3 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 437 409.48 14.38 $ 5,888.32 ,4 BIT MATL FOR TACK COAT GAL. 270 375 1.43 $ 536.25 E5 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, L.F. 19151,964 4.90 $ 9,623.60 DESIGN D 418 46 SEEDING, MIX. TYPE 500 ACRE 1.1 .53 969.00 $ 513.57 ?AGE 3 OF 4 • SHORT - ELLIOTT - HENDRICKSON, INC. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued Total Contract Amount $ 119. 917.2.9 Total Amount Earned $ 123, 779.17 Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incoporated into Work $ *ontract Change Order No. 2 Percent _Complete 100% $ 14 ,107.00 Contract Change Order No. 3 Percent Complete 100% $ 2,097.05 Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $ CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress. payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under- signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said contract, and (2) all material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances. •ted January 12 , 19 90 COUNTY OF c (Le ) SS STATE OF is ue ) GROSS AMOUNT DUE $ 139, 983.22 LESS % RETAINAGE $ .00 AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $ 139.983.22 LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS $ ©r ggl'g� AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION $ `" Volk Sewer and Water, Inc. (Contractor) By D- 51---Q-71 '` - U resident (Name and Title) 3efor,, me op this /� �� y of / / , 19 U personally appeared ,7,2_. , l'. //� kno to me, who being duly sworn, did depose and say thatshe is the X.,/ —�_e of the Contractor above mentioned; Office) that he executed the above Application for Payment and Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor; and that all of the statements contained therein are true and compete. 1 - BRUCE BEDNAREK My Commission Exp NOTARY i•'UOLIC -- MiN,,ESOTA 1 � � /) 2- / �' HENNEPIN COUNTY J (Notary Pub4'ic0 My Commission Expires Dec, 2, 105 4 The undersigned he s Application for Payment shown above. A part of this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this Contract have been applied by him to discharge in full all of his obligations in connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment. In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the *Lint Due. Date J o,.. ) (•o, f 9 t o Page 4 of 4 By "R END�tI� N, INC. d . • • • STAFF REQUEST ITEM DEPARTMENT Administratio MEETING DATE Feb ruau Ei,_,13911 _ DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is) Request approval to attend State Municipal Clerk's Conference in Brainerd, Minnesota March 21 - 23, 1990 FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request) The approximate costs are: Ruistration $125.00 3 nights lodging 187.61 Incidental meals 40.00 Travel 50.00 Total 40 2 .S1 This item has been budgeted. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED YES X NO ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. SUBMITTED BY Mary Lou Johnso DATE 2/1/90 Wednesday, March 21 9:00 am 10:30 10:45 Noon 1:00 pm 3:10 Thursday, March 22 9:00 am 10:30 10:45 MCFOA Annual Conference March 21- 23,1990 Tentative Schedule Personnel Files: What's Public, What's Private Refreshment Break Hiring and Firing Practices Lunch Concurrent Workshops 1. New Clerks Orientation Tom Thelen 2. Tax Increment Financing • Mary Ippel 3. Testing for Drugs and AIDS in the Workplace Robert Hamilton 2:10 Concurrent Workshops 1. Elections 2. Charitable Gambling 3. Computer User Group Refreshment Break 3:30 Concurrent Workshops by City Size 1.0 -1,000 2. 1,000 -2,500 3. 2,500 - 10,000 4. Over 10,000 Data Privacy Refreshment Break Truth in Taxation 12:00 Lunch 1:00 pm Business Meeting 2:10 1. League of Cities Trust 2. Fair Labor Standards Act 3. Investments 3:10 Refreshment Break • 3:30 1. Recycling 2. Accounting fo Cities over 2,500 3. Comparable Worth Hearings Robert Hamilton Robert Hamilton Marge Christensen Tony Bouza Ed Fuller Tom Thelen Glenys Ehlert, Dave Pederson Tom Meulbroeck, Glen Pederson Kevin Haliday, Joyce Twistol Joel Jaminik Peter Tritz Dave Pederson Roger Delap Rick Schroeder Karl Huber Don Rippentrop Joyce Twistol • • • Friday, March 23 9:00 am Non Verbal Communication: Perception is Reality Michael Johnson 10:20 Refreshment Break 10:40 Leadership with Integrity Noon Adjourn Michael Johnson • • • f �r TO: Mayor and City Council FR: City Coordinator DA: February 2, 1990 RE: CITY HALL SECURITY SYSTEM M E M O R A N D U M I have received the attached proposal from Sentry Systems, Inc. (Denny Notaro) to install a motion sensor type of alarm system for the main level of City Hall. The system will cost about $1,500 to install and about $18 per month to maintain. The system would include 3 "panic" buttons that could be used in case of an emergency situation in the main office and in the Council Chambers. I believe it would be very wise to consider purchasing this system in view of the vandalism that has taken place recently in some public buildings (e.g., Sibley High and Stillwater High School). -5i/7„31.( tma'eec/FO ar 44 ' 1. ENTRY YSTEMS NC . Since 1963 (612)4264627 Main oma Alarm System Purchase Agreement Today's Date 1- a6 o City - State - zip S 4, Lt. u i Tr r t r m n1 ' 5 ) Y . System to be located at Contact Person ,)iI- K •teSeL Purpose, Protection And Price This Agreement is between YOU and Sentry Systems, Inc. (SSI). YOU are the Buyer. Under this Agreement SSI is selling YOU alarm equipment listed in the Schedule of Protection, and will install that equipment as an AlarmSystem at the location listed above. YOU agree to pay the deposit amount indicated, and the balance of the Invoice Total when the Alarm System has been installed (or according to the payment schedule if different), and YOU have been shown how to operate the Alarm System. 1: Schedule Of Protection Control 811 a Digital Switch Pad 1 Siren 3 Interior Protection Buyer's Name C 1 l v 0 - r S - 1 - t Lk_ w A +t r Lis 1, (IV+i'h Oki Y e 1 R (fn O - I t:a s) sad . Area, c1h67n6,- Ar-ea v0,4 uPPer l4att.way Au Pl. 3 Duo P S Cu i 4 Cov R"n l0'7 eAcIC boors 4-o P Ldci eflctc Dccr Acirm. Av 5 �v +cm,44ic 4r'rerlI:V) �e64 2. YOU agree to the Agreements and Understandings printed on the BACK of this Agreement and acknowledge that YOU:ttave read and understand them. YOU agree that SSI is not an insurer and that SSI's liability is specifically limited by the Agreements and Unerstandings. 3. This is not a binding Agreement until it has been accepted by an Authorized Representative of SSI. If it is not accepted. SSI's only liabilitywil be to refund any amount that YOU have paid to SSI according to this Agreement. Sentry Systems, Inc. l Sales Representative k/n1 S I SSI uth�ri 4 T & If this is not a home solicitation sale, check here ❑ and intial No +c1rC) 1873 EAST MAIN ST. HUGO, MINNESOTA 55038 a Buyer Name (please print) Signature Account Number Address 1 I Buyer's Phone Number X1 35 -61Q1 2. Costs 500 y Oo 75 t co Boo Cum„ Pu-}-er 50 1 5 n Map Locator # Date Service Started tJo� -4h 1 I +.11 I Buyers's Alternate Phone No. Subtotal Tax System Total Down Payment Balance Amount I and the following cancellation does not apply. Buyer's Right To Cancel You, the Buyer, may cancel this transaction at any time prior to midnight of the third business day after the date of thls transaction. i • • • SPECIAL MEETING Absent: None STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 9, 1990 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson. Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble (arrived at 4:55), Opheim, and Mayor Abrahamson Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel City Attorney Magnuson Finance Director Deblon Public Safety Director Mawhorter Recording Secretary Schaubach Press: Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette Sharon Baker, The Courier POLICE DIRECTIVES MANUAL 4:30 p.m. Public Safety Director Mawhorter presented the new Police Directives Manual, which he stated was two - thirds complete, and asked for Council approval of the manual as presented and authority to continue to issue new directives as needed. Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve the Police Directives Manual and to authorize Chief Mawhorter to promulgate additional rules and regulations as necessary. Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Opheim, and Mayor Abrahamson Nays - None TEAM BUILDING WORKSHOP (Councilmember Kimble arrived) City Coordinator Kriesel discussed information received from Mr. Don Salverda regarding a Team Building Workshop for Council on February 10, 1990, and Council's objectives. Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to employ Mr. Don Salverda for a Team Building Workshop for February 10, 1990, and to also have a joint Council /Department Head workshop on February 9, 1990. (All in favor) Discussion continued regarding a location for_the Workshop. Council agreed to meet in the conference room in City Attorney Magnuson's office and at City Hall for the joint Council /staff workshop. Stillwater City Council Minutes Special Meeting January 9, 1990 OAK GLEN Mayor Abrahamson, Mr. Kriesel, and Mr. Magnuson attended the Washington County Board meeting this morning regarding purchase of the Oak Glen Golf Course. Mr. Magnuson reported on the results of the meeting. The City Attorney was directed to begin preparation of a contingency plan regarding possible purchase of the golf course in the event the County did not elect to purchase the golf course. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ASSISTANCE ON MAIN STREET Community Development Director Russell reported on the City's TIF Policy and its objectives, procedure and general requirements in regard to a request for TIF financing for a project on North Main Street. The applicant, Mark Desch, and his architect, Mike McGuire, were present to discuss the project and the TIF request. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble, to authorize staff to proceed with the project and to create an acceptable development agreement with the applicant. (All in favor) SALE OF PARKING METERS Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to authorize the sale of old downtown meters at $10 per meter at a public sale and to establish a price for sale of the salvageable meters. (All in favor) OTHER BUSINESS Request for amendment to athletic complex grant - Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to extend the project deadline for the State Grant for the Jaycee athletic complex grant disbursements to December 31, 1990. (All in favor) Reappointment of Councilmember Bodlovick to Cable Commission - Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to reappoint Councilmember Bodlovick to another term on the Cable Commission. (All in favor) 2 • • • • • • Stillwater City Council Minutes Special Meeting January 9, 1990 Countv Jail - Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to direct City staff to work with the County to determine who is to be the Regulating Governmental Unit and who will pay for the EAW. (All in favor) System Upgrade - Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to adjourn the meeting at 6:15 p.m. Under discussion, it was determined that the Finance Director had an additional item to discuss with Council, and the motion failed. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to authorize the Finance Director to sell the old IBM system for the best price. (All in favor) ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to adjourn the meeting at 6:20 p.m. to executive session. (All in favor) ATTEST: Submitted by: CITY CLERK Shelly Schaubach Recording Secretary MAYOR • • • REGULAR MEETING The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Abrahamson. Present: Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Absent: None Also Present: Press: Others: STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL MINUTES January 16, 1990 City Coordinator Kriesel City Attorney Magnuson Public Works Director Junker Public Safety Director Mawhorter Consulting Engineer Moore Comm. Dev. Director Russell Parks Director Blekum City Clerk Johnson Sharon Baker, The Courier Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette Julie Kink, St.Croix Valley Press 7:00 P.M. Clayton Patterson, Gary Funke, Richard Illka, Sen. Gary Laidig, Rep. Doug Swenson, Rep. Harriet McPherson, Tom Weber, Leonard Feeley. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mayor Abrahamson brought Council attention to City Clerk Johnson's memo regarding a possible correction to the December 19, 1989 Regular Council Meeting Minutes. Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to correct the minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 19, 1989 as follows: Page 4, Item 2 - Motion should read "...for approval on January 16, 1990; and also including the appropriate resolution adopting the 1990 Parking Fund Budget ". (Resolution No. 8233). Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None. Page 5, Item 6.b. Resolution adopting 1990 Parking Fund Budget. This sentence should read, This item was discussed under 'Report regarding Implementation of Downtown Parking Program and Budget'; 1 Stillwater City Council Minutes January 16, 1990 Regular Meeting and accept the minutes of the Special Meeting of December 19, 1989 and Regular and Recessed Meetings of January 2, 1990 as presented. (All in favor). INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS 1. Discussion of Upcoming Legislative Session - State Senator Laidig and State Representatives McPherson and Swenson. State Senator Laidig and State Representatives McPherson and Swenson were present to discuss current legislative issues with the Council, which included requests for possible grants for the reconstruction of the levee wall, infrastructure sewer problems in the downtown area, refuse and recycling, charitable gambling, Unicameral vs. Bicameral Legislature, terms of office of leg - stators and possible changes in TIF funding. 2. Tom Weber - Request for four -way stop signs at Willard & Holcombe Street intersection. Motion by Councilmember Kinble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt the appropriate resolution approving the installation of four -way stop signs at Willard & Holcombe Streets. (Resolution No. 8234) Ayes - Councilmembers Bodiovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None STAFF REPORTS 1. Public Works - No Report. 2. Parks Department - No Report. 3. Public Safety Director - Placement of Purchase Order for Squad Cars Motion by Councilmember Kinble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve the request of Public Safety Director Mawhorter to place an order for two squad cars in the amount o= $24,804.20. (All in favor). Purchase of Desks Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve an additional amount of $232.00 for the purchase of desks for the Police Dept. (All in favor). 4. Community Development Director - No report. 5. Consulting Engineer - Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve Change Order No. 5 for L.I. 251, Forest Hills /T.H. 36 Frontage Road project; and authorize Mayor and Clerk to sign. (All in favor). 2 • • • Stillwater City Council Minutes January 16, 1990 Regular Meeting • • UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Downtown Parking Plan Update. Mr. Russell explained the recommendation for signage of downtown parking. Basically, all on- street parking is designated two -hour parking and the four public parking lots will be signed four -hour parking. He further discussed unrestricted parking areas, thirty- minute spaces and handicapped space. Discussion followed with Council, which included the need for an ordinance amending the City Code and education of the public regarding the signs. Motion by Councilmember Opheim, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve placement of an order for parking signs for the Downtown area as recommended by Comm. Dev. Director Russell. (All in favor). Council recessed for five minutes and reconvened at 8:25 P.M. NEW BUSINESS 1. Consulting Engineer - MSA Five -year Construction Report. Mr. Moore presented an update to the City's five -year capital improvement program for Minnesota State Aid routes which must be done every three years. It would include Mulberry St. this year and McKusick Rd. and Neal Ave. next year with work done in conjunction with the County. Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve the five -year MSA Construction Program as presented by Consulting Engineer Moore for presentation to the State Dept. of Transportation. (All in favor). CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve the Consent Agenda of January 16, 1990 including the following: (All in favor) . 1. Directing Payment of Bills (Resolution No. 8232). Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 2. Contractors' Licenses. Miller Excavating, Inc. Excavators Renewal 3636 Stagecoach Trail No. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Penn -Co. Construction, Inc. General Contractor New 1301 Corporate Center Dr. Eagan, Mn. 55121 3 Stillwater City Council Mirutes January 16, 1990 Regular Meeting 3M General Contractor Renewal 3M Center 900 Bush Street St. Paul, Mn. 55133 3. Authorization to submit Workers' Comp. claim to insurance agent for Jay Ludowese. 4. Ratification of Counci' Poll for December 26, 1989 - transfer of On -Sale & Sunday Liquor License back to Palmer Family, Lowell Inn. 5. Denial of request for `ewer Bill Adjustment - 821 No. 4th St. 6. Set Public Hearing Date of February 6, 1990 for the following Planning Cases: a. Approval of the West Stillwater Business Park Plan as a component of the City Comprehen <.ive Plan, an area which includes the lands between So. Greeley on the east & Long Lake on the west, Highway 36 on the south & W. Orleans St. & the Benson Farm on the north. b. Case No. PUD/89 -82 - Modification of a previously approved PUD for a 56 -unit townhouse apartment complex, retail development & Office Bldg., to preliminary Plat Approval for a multi- family residential PUD consisting of 14 s -plex condominium units at the northeast corner of Highway 5 & Orleans; St. in the RA, Single Family Residential Dist., Heritage Dev. Corp,, Applicant. c. Case No. SUB/89 -83 - Resubdivision of Block 1, the Cottages of Stillwater, from 3 lots to 16 lots at the northeast corner of. Highway 5 & Orleans St. in the RA, Single - Family Residential Dist., Heritage Development Corp., Applicant. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Collection of Used Eye Glasses by River Valley Lions Councilmember Farrell wnnounced that old eye glasses can be dropped off at City Hall, 216 No. 4th St., for collection by the River Valley Lions for renewal and issuance to people who cannot afford glasses. STAFF REPORTS (Continued) City Attorney - Request for extension of time for answer to Nuisance Abatement at 4th & Pine Streets. Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick to approve the extension of t to March 1, 1990 for James Meyers to prepare an answer to the Order of Abatement for his property at 4th and Pine Streets; and directing the Building Dept. to withhold a building permit until Council has acted on this issue. (All in favor). 4 • • • Stillwater City Council Minutes January 16, 1990 Regular Meeting • Council also suggested another opinion be sought (apart from Mr. Meyer's engineer /architect) to decide whether the building is rebuildable. City Coordinator - Sale of Parking Meters City Coordinator Kriesel announced that parking meters will be sold on January 20, 1990 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the City Garage for $5 to $15 each. Council Workshop Meeting - January 30, 1990 Council will hold a Workshop Meeting at 4:30 P.M. on January 30, 1990 to discuss Department Head salaries. Municipal's Workshop Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Farrell to approve the request for attendance of four to five people at the Municipal's Workshop at the end of January at a cost of $27.00 per person. (All in favor). COMMUNICATIONS /REQUESTS 1. Dues Statement for Ass'n. of Metro. Municipalities. This was for Council information only. • 2. Solicitation for advertising for 1990 Nat'l. Wheelchair Basketball Championship event, March 27 - 31, 1990. No action was taken. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Farrell, seconded by Councilmember Bodlovick, to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 P.M. (All in favor). Resolutions: No. 8232 - Directing Payment of Bills. No. 8234 - Installation of four -way stop signs at Willard & Holcombe Streets. ATTEST: CITY CLERK 5 MAYOR TRAM 250 THE RIDE ACROSS MINNESOTA January 9, 1990 Ann Pung - Terrwedo City of Stillwater 216 N. Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Ann: Thanks for scheduling us on the city council agenda for the February 6, :1990 meeting. We look forward to presenting our plans for. The Ride Across Minnesota, TRAM, to the City of Stillwater. We are very excited about ending this cross state bicycle tour in the scenic St. Croix Valley. We appreciate all your help and support. Please let me know the time of the council meeting when it is set, thanks. Best Regards, Mary HuVs kd2018tr Minnesota Multiple Sclerosis Society 2344 Nicollet Avenue S., Suite #280 Minneapolis, MN 55404 -3381 1-800-446-7119 (1- 800 - 582 -5296 in MN) (612) 870 -1500 A joint project of the Multiple Sclerosis Society, Celebrate Minnesota 1990 & the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission • PS-9136-04 PartnerOfficer Partner,'Officer PartnerOfficer Partner;Officer Code first floor STATE OF MINNESOTA / CJ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ST. PAUL. MN 55101 (612)x:96 -6430 APPLICATION FOR OFF SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED. If a corporation, an officer shall execute this application. If a partnership, a partner shall execute this application. Applicant's Name (Individual, Corporation, Partnership) Eileen V. Pieister (License Location (Street Address/Lot & Block No.) 117 W. Churchill St. Municipality Stillwater Name of Store Manager David J. :ieister If a corporation, state name, date of birth, address, title, and shares held by each officer. If a partnership, state names, address and date of birth of each partner. D.O.B. Address D.O.B. D.O.B. D.O.B. • 1. If a corporation, date of incorporation authorized capitalization other corporation, so state corporation Address Address Address Trade Name or DBA eister's South Will Liquor License Period Applicant's Home Phone From Jan. 1990 Jan. 1991 ( 612 439 - 423:; County Washington Business Phone Number 430 -3266 state incorporated in amount of , amount of paid in capital , if a subsidiary of any give purpose of if incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota? . Number of certificate of authority 2. Describe premises to which license applies; such as (first floor, second floor, basement, etc.) or if entire building, so state /_/ 5 6 State Zip Code iinne sota 55082 Date of Birth (Individual Applicant) City City City City Title /Shares Title /Shares Title /Shares Title /Shares 3. If operating under a zoning ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? 4. Is establishment located near any state university, state hospital, training school, reformatory or 2 miles prison? y , state approximate distance 5. State name and address of owner of building has owner of building any connection, directly or indirectly, with applicant? Eileen V. Meister same 6. State whether applicant, or any of the associated in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so give date and details 7. Has the applicant, or any of the associated in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so , give date and details LO 8. State whether applicant, or any of the associates in this application, and employees while employed by applicant during the past five years were convicted of any Liquor Law in this state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and details ? ° 9. Is applicant, or any of the associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued? --° . If so in what capacity FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Mailing Address (If other than Licensing Authority) Transaction Type Fees Date Approved Violations Approved 10. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment for which license is applied, and if so give name and details. :o 11. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? i'es Give name and address of such establishment 'Teister-'s :mar Grill 901 Stillwater, ° n, 12. Furnish name and address of one bank reference 13. Under what classification is the license applied for: EXCLUSIVE OFF -SALE LIQUOR STORE, DRUG STORE, COMBINATION ON & OF= LIQUOR, OR GENERAL FOOD STORE Exclusive Off —Sale liq, 14. Are the premises now occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other busines; establishment? yes . 15. If a drug store, state length of tirre the store has been in operation 16. State whether applicant has, or will be granted, an On -Sale Liquor License in conjunction with this Off -Sale Liquor License, and for the same premises `o 17. State whether applicant has, or will be granted, a Sunday On -Sale Liquor License in conjunction with the regular On -Sale Liquor License 18. State whether applicant has, or will be granted an Off -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Beverage (3/2) o License in conjunction with this Off-Sale Liquor License ' 19: During the past license year has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Law (Dram Shop) - M.S. 340A.802. ❑ Yes Q No. If yes, attach a copy of the summons. Subscribed and sworn to before rune this ay of , 19 9 Atc_6—tz - (Notary Publ/c) C^' eMyacornaissiort,expiro .. .,..;•, MARY LOU JOHNSON "' ��n NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA % "t 2 � RAMSEY crliN C�. d My Commissio PrORT. APPLICANT OR APPLICANTS BY POLICE DEPARTMENT This is to certify that the applicant, and the associates, named herein have not been convicted within the past five years for any violation of Laws of the State of Minnesota, or Municipal Ordinances relating to Intoxicating Liquor, except as hereinafter stated Approved By: - 2irstar Stillwater Bank I hereby certify that I have read the above question and that the answers are true of my own knowledge. eo _ / 1 /42,, (Signature of applicant) < <� c I Police Department (Name of city, village or borough) / 2 / 131 ((SoPe/ Title (If you have no police department, either the Marshal or the Constable shall execute this report on the applicant.) • • • DAV10 MAWHORTER PUBUC SAFETY DIRECTOR • TO: D P . MAWHORTER FROM: L. .A. MILLER 2A2a1,2,, THE t1IITN►IACE OF MINNESOTA STILLWATER PONCE DEPARTMENT RE: EILEEN V. MEISTER - APPLICATION FOR OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE DATE: 012390 AT 117 W. CHURCHILL ST. ( MEISTER SO HILL LIQUOR) RECORD CHECKS ON EILEEN MEISTER SHOW A DWI CONVICTION IN 1980. NO CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OR KNOWN LIQUOR VIOLATIONS SINCE THAT TIME. MEISTER PRESENTLY OWNS MEISTERS BAR & GRILL, 901 S 4TH ST THIS CITY. NO KNOWN LIQUOR OR CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS ON HER PRESENT LIQUOR • OPERATION. 212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone: 612-439 -1314 or 612-439-1336 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE 911 • • llwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 9, 1990 SUBJECT: WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PLAN The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the West Stillwater Business Park Plan January 8, 1990. Notice of the meeting was given to plan area property owners and owners living within 350 feet of the Plan area boundaries. Comments were received from Pine Tree Trail and West Orleans residents regarding the connection of Pine Tree Trail to West Orleans. The City Transportation Engineer explained that the connection would probably not result in any increase in traffic .volume at the Pine Tree Trail and Pine Street intersection. Traffic would increase on West Orleans Street just west of Greeley. Residents were concerned about increased cut - through traffic using the new road connection. . Other comments were received from Township residents who live off of North 62nd Street. They were concerned about the Multi - family Residential designation for land adjoining them between their backyards and State Highway 36. In response to the Pine Tree Trail and North 62nd Street concerns, the Commission changed the land use designation of the plan for the land adjacent to Highway 36 to Single Family Residential, in effect deferring the future use of that area until the area is annexed to the City and a development proposal is made. Regarding Pine Tree Trail, the Commission felt that, based on the Engineer's presentation, the extension of Pine Tree Trail was a good way of improving a poor road circulation but were not entirely comfortable with the Pine Tree Trail -West Orleans connection. They understood the neighborhoods concern for cut - through traffic and felt the proposed alignment would not increase that, although there may be other alternatives. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the Plan as an amendment to the City Comprehensive Plan designating the Multi- Family Residential area along State Highway 36 Single Family. ATTACHMENT: WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PLAN. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • RESOLUTION Resolution amending the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan by adopting the West Stillwater Business Park Plan. WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Act requires that cities prepare Comprehensive Plans; and WHEREAS, from time to time amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are needed as conditions and City policy change; and WHEREAS, THE City of Stillwater has prepared and duly adopted a City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan and more detailed area plans as a part of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated a Comprehensive Plan amendment request described as the West Stillwater Business Park Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on January 8, 1990, after review of the amendment, does recommend approval of the amendment as consistent with City comprehensive planning policy; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amendment and Planning Commission recommendation at a duly advertised public hearing February 6, 1990; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the amendment, Planning Commission recommendations, and public comments, do find the amendment in the public interest and for the community betterment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Stillwater does approve the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. DATE: City Clerk Mayor • RESOLUTION CPC /90 -1 • Resolution amending the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan by adopting the West Stillwater Business Park Plan WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Act of 1976 requires that cities prepare comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has prepared a Comprehensive Plan and more detailed area plans as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, from time to time the City of Stillwater receives request for changes to the Comprehensive Plan based on changing conditions in the community; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission has received a request from the City Council for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan described as: West Stillwater Business Park area generally bounded by Long Lake, State Highway 36, South Greeley and West Orleans Streets; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the West Stillwater Business Park Plan on January 8, 1990, considering City land use policy, the existing development patterns, and the availability of public facilities and land development capabilities. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the amendment as consistent with City Comprehensive Plan Policy. DATE: Secretary Chairman, Planning Commission • THE PLAN i1hvater. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 4, 1990 SUBJECT: WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PLAN BACKGROUND: In October of 1987 the Stillwater City Council placed a moratorium on retail development in portions of the Stillwater Industrial Park and directed preparation of a plan for the area. A ten member West Stillwater Business Park Committee was established to work with Planning Staff in preparation of the plan. Five members from the Planning Commission were on the Study Committee to make sure the plan is coordinated with the City Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the five commissioners, five business owners or property owners who have interest in the area were • appointed to the Committee. To prepare the plan, the Committee met monthly from May through December, holding a public hearing in November. The plan describes existing conditions and issues for the Business Park (pages 3 -10). The areas of land use /zoning /transportation system, utilities, area design and recent development trends are described. Major areas identified needing consideration are land use and zoning designations, annexation areas, completion of the transportation systems, utility extensions and design quality. The next section of the plan lists goals and objectives to guide development of the area (pages 10 -12). The goals and objectives are organized by subject areas; land use, road system, utilities, park and open space, area design and cooperations. The goals and objectives provide direction for more specific implementing action such as land use designations and zoning, future road alignments, park and open space needs, and design guidelines. The third section of the report contains a land use plan for the West Stillwater Business Park area (pages 13 -14). Proposed land use is shown on Map 6. The map shows retail commercial uses along Highway 36 and the east side of County Road 5 to West Orleans. Office /commercial use is shown between Curve Crest Blvd. and Tower Drive and along West Orleans Street. Industrial sites are designated for land north of Curve Crest Blvd. The Benson Farm is III designated residential, the north part around the lake single family, and the southerly part closest to Orleans Street multi - family. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • A five to eight acre neighborhood park is shown in the Benson Farm area. Open space areas are shown along the steep south banks of City lake and on the west side of County Road 5 just north of Highway 36 intersection. Proposed zoning Map 7 follows and implements the land use map. Proposed zoning districts are provided for the commercial, office and industrial districts. The new zoning district defines permitted uses more closely to the primary purpose of the district. Other development requirements are shown on page 18. The Land Use section contains special development guidelines for four sites shown on maps 8 -9 -10. A road system is proposed extending Curve Crest Boulevard to County Road 5, connecting north 62nd Street to County Road 5 and extending Pine Tree Trail and West Orleans. Design guidelines for new development in the Business Park are described on pages 20 and 21. The final section contains an implementation program that can be carried out over time to implement the goals and objectives and other direction in the plan. OTHER INFORMATION Correspondence received regarding the plan from the Stillwater Area Economic Development Corporation, SADEC, and an area property owner are attached. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION This meeting is a hearing on the West Stillwater Business Park Plan. The plan is a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public comment and reviewing the plan, the Commission can make changes in the plan as appropriate and recommend plan apprvoval it to the City Council by resolution. ATTACHMENT: West Stillwater Business Park Plan. • STILLWATER AREA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RESOLUTION ON RESERVING CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL LAND WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has created a study commission to examine land use potential in the area north of Highway 36 and west of existing development in the commercial /industrial park; and WHEREAS, the seventy -two acre vacant parcel located at the northeast corner of Highways 36 and 5 is included in the study area; and, WHEREAS, the Stillwater Area Economic Development Corporation has reviewed properties available for industrial development; and WHEREAS, the subject site has been identified in the industrial site inventory as an important part of the areas industrial property reserve; and WHEREAS, Stillwater Area Economic Development Corporation is of the opinion that Stillwater should preserve the majority of said site for industrial purposes. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the SAEDC strongly encourages the Study Commission and the City of Stillwater to preserve the majority of this site excluding the Highway 36 frontage for •industrial purposes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in order to protect the potential for this property an Industrial zoning classification be assigned to this parcel. A Signed this r23R day of AL,t G 4_C ' , 1989 . . Lux, Secretary 7 . /41.4 e? 42 es W. Torseth, President 4 • • December 4, 1989 Steve Russell City of Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Russell: WILLIAM R. SPANGLER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT 12811 N. 62ND STREET STILLWATER. MN 55082 (612) 439 -0409 I am in receipt of the meeting notice regarding the Business Park Plan Committee suggestions. I was unable to come to the meeting due to prior commitments. I talked to you on the phone Friday, November 17th, and you expained to me that the Curve Crest Boulevard would continue to just north of 62nd Street on Highway 5 in order to have better access to the industrial park area. You are not sure if Curve Crest Boulevard would connect to 62nd Street, but suggested that I write you indicating my desires. I am the first house off Highway 5 on-62nd Street on the south side and I, for one, would like 62nd Street to have a dead -end cul -de -sac at Highway 5. I also have talked to Grady Thomas, the neighbor two doors west of me on 62nd Street and he would also like to have 62nd Street dead -ended at Highway 5. The traffic on that roadway has become excessive since the township blacktopped it and the road itself is too narrow for normal traffic. Therefore, by cul-de-sacing it would cut down on the traffic in that area and eliminate what I feel is a real traffic hazard on 62nd Street. That is, individuals speeding on this section of the road and cars trying to get on to 62nd from their driveways. I would be more than willing to go up to Highway 15 in order to access Highway 36 or Highway 5. In addition, you mentioned that the property behind me abutting Highway 36 was suggested to be zoned for multiple residential units. If I had anything to say about the zoning, I would suggest that it be residential or townhouse residential rather than apartment buildings. Apartment buildings generally bring an influx of individuals into an area which sometimes causes trouble. This property is presently zoned R2 which I think is residential which includes duplexes. Let's leave it zoned for single family units or duplexes or townhouses. Thank you for your consideration of these viewpoints. W. R. Spa er • Craig P. Wallin 810 Pine Tree Trail Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 430 -3392 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Pat Tierney Mr. Jim Kriesel Mr. Mike Pike Mr. Jack Nelson FR: Craig Wallin DA: January 14, 1990 RE: Proposed Extension of Pine Tree Trail. This letter is in response to your January 12, 1990 letter to the Neighbors of Pine Tree Trail, South of Pine Street. Due to prior commitments, I am unable to attend the January 25, 1990 meeting with the Neighbors /Homeowners of Pine Tree Trail. I am in total agreement that the intersection of Pine Street and Pine Tree Trail is in fact not a favorable one. However, I am not opposed to the proposed extension of Pine Tree Trail to East Orleans Street due to a number of reasons: (1) The proposed extension would provide an alternate route in which would in turn allow residents to use rather than the unfavorable intersection of Pine Street and Pine Tree Trail. (2) It would provide a more feasible access (Ingress and Egress) for Emergency Vehicles. (3) Due to the current state in which the street is in we are getting alot of Ingress and Egress traffic. The extension would decrease the amount of traffic flow a great deal. (4) As far as future development is concerned in terms of single family homes they would be more apt to use the East Orleans route due to the un- favorable intersection of Pine Street and Pine Tree Trail and it would be a more convineiant route to shopping malls, filling stations etc.. In May of 1989, at my request I was appointed to the City of Stillwater West Buisness Park Planning Committee. The committee lasted for eight months. The extension of Pine Tree Trail to East Orleans Street was disgussed in great lenght and detail with a representitive from MnDOT. He also shared his knowledge and expertise with the committe in reference to the extension as he did with the concerned residents involved at the last Planning Commission public hearing in which was held on January 8, 1990. If you should have any questions about the contents of this letter, please don't hesitate in giving me a call. XC: Mayor Wally Abrahamson City Council Members: Opheim, Kimble, Farrell and Bodlovick Respectfully, • • • • WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARR PLAN DECEMBER 1989 WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK PLAN COMMITTEE Jerry Fontaine Planning Commissioner Glenna Bealka Planning Commissioner Mark Elenz Planning Commissioner Rob Hamlin Planning Commissioner Jean Jacobson Planning Commissioner Neal Skinner Property Owner Jack Lux Realtor•member SAEDC Craig Wallin Property owner "Benson Farm" Betsy Larey Business Manager River Heights Athletic Club Gunnar Balstad Business Owner Stillwater Inn Prepared by City of Stillwater Community Development with assistance from Short Elliot Hendrickson consultants. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pate •Reasons for Plan 1 Introduction 1 Existing Conditions 3 Goals and Objectives 9 Land Use Plan 12 Design Guidelines 20 Implementation Program 22 REASONS FOR THE PLAN The original plan for the Stillwater Industrial Park was adopted in 1980 as a part of the Comprehensive Plan. Since that time, the area has experienced much change. Major new commercial and industrial development has occurred, road and utilities have been extended to newly subdivided tracks of land, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Washington County have approved new plans for roads adjacent to the area and lands outside the Stillwater City boundary are being considered for annexation and development. Besides these changes, the question of land use was raised with the consideration of the Woodland Lakes Mall /Hotel project. When the Woodland Lake project failed, the City Council placed a moratorium on retail development in the industrial park district until area land use can be reconsidered and a new plan adopted. INTRODUCTION In October of 1988, the City Council passed a moratorium on retail development in a portion of the West Stillwater Business Park Area. A purpose of the moratorium was to allow time to study and prepare a new plan to guide development in the area. The new plan was to consider existing land use and zoning to see if it is appropriate. Other planning issues needing consideration included the extension and completion of the road system, sewer and water service extensions, design quality of new development, annexations and the coordination of plans with Minnesota Department of Transportation, Washington County and Stillwater Township. To prepare the West Stillwater Business Park Plan, the City Council appointed a ten - member committee with five members from the Planning Commission and five business and property owners from the study area. The Committee met monthly from May to December 1989, reviewing existing conditions including land and zoning, utilities, street locations, economic activity and Comprehensive Plan Development Policy. Questionnaires were sent out to all business and property owners in the Industrial Park Study Area to obtain information on type of business, employment, business expansion plans, importance of new building design and impediments to new development. Based on the existing conditions, information and a review of the City Comprehensive Plan Policy, a set of goals and objectives and land use map for the future development of Industrial Park area was developed. The goals and objectives were used along with existing conditions information and committee input to develop new land use designations, road locations and recommended zoning. 1 The West Stillwater Park Land Area Plan is organized in four sections, Existing Conditions and Planning Uses, Goals and Objectives, Land Use Plan and Implementation Program. The Implementation Program is the final section of the plan. The program lists specific actions that are necessary to carry out the intent of the plan. The West Stillwater Business Plan Committee held a public hearing on the Draft Plan November 20, 1989. Comments from several major property owners and surrounding residents were received as input to the final plan. 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PLANNING ISSUES The West Stillwater Business Park Plan Area is shown on Map 1. It contains 450 acres of land stretching from South Greeley Street on the east to Country Road 5 and Long Lake on the west. On the south, the boundary is Highway 36 and on the north West Orleans Street and the Benson Farm. The planning area can be described in terms of three subareas, each area exhibiting different characteristics. Long Lake Long Lake and its drainage area form the western boundary of the area. The land in this area is gently rolling, sloping west to Long Lake. There are farms and some large single family homes in this area. No sewer /water services are available. Currently the only access to this area is off of 62nd street a narrow two -lane road. Most of this area is under the jurisdiction of Stillwater Township. Business Park Going east just across County Road 5 is the largest vacant parcels in the study area. These prime sites comprise approximately 60 acres of land. The sites do not have sewer /water service. Access to this land is provided from Highway 5 or West Orleans Street, from the extension of Curve Crest Boulevard, Tower Drive and an extension of Highway 36 Frontage Road. Several smaller five to eight acre parcels are located between the east boundary of the vacant 60 area site and Washington Avenue. Within the Business Park Area most of the parcels along Highway 36 have been developed while many of sites to the north have not. Sites in this area are accessed from Washington Avenue, West Orleans Street, Tower Drive and Curve Crest Boulevard. Sewer /water lines generally run along the existing and partially constructed streets. East of Washington Avenue to Greeley Street is the original Stillwater Industrial Park. A variety of retail, commercial and industrial development are located in this area including major industries. Benson Farm North of the Business Park is the Benson Farm. As with the Long Lake area the Benson Farm is under Stillwater Township jurisdiction. The Benson Farm is primarily flat land, with some steeply sloped area around Lily Lake. Access to this area is provided from a future extension of West Orleans Street or Pine Tree Trail a residential street. The farm has no sewer /water service. The nearest utility lines run along Curve Crest Boulevard. Lily Lake Elementary School is located to the northwest of the site and Lily Lake park to the northeast. 3 T 3. a f� • r .i _ 7� Li � I -Viral 331' 1d 1 1 1 . LJ� 0 a 17r I1N01N III "*' s r s i svol • 0A18 lblal.floNI • 3AV Na3153MHlacw j\ v • 31aa Land Use /Economic Activity The West Stillwater Business Park contains approximately 450 acres and 111 businesses (see Map 2 - Existing Land Use). Over 2,200 people are employed in +1,000,000 square feet of building space. The total value of property in the Business Park area is over $45 million or 10% of total City market value. Of the total acreage in the Business Park, 48 percent or 216 acres is vacant land, 19 percent agricultural, 11 percent is office /service, 8 percent is industrial. 7.5 percent is retail, 5 percent is residential and 1.5 percent is restaurant as shown on the Land Use Chart below. Of the total property value of approximately $45 million, 30 percent of the value if office /service, 24 percent is retail, 10.5 percent is industrial, 14 percent is vacant land, 9.5 percent is residential, 3 percent is restaurants and 1 percent is agricultural land. Total employment in the area is over 2,200. Nine hundred twenty -four or 42 percent of employees are employed in industrial businesses, 847 or 38.5 percent in office /service, 220 or 10 percent in restaurants and 205 or 9.5 percent in retail. For industrial businesses, 98 percent of their employees are full time, for office /service 73 percent, retail 52 percent and restaurants 21 percent are full time employees. Nine hundred and ninety of the employees or 37.5 percent of the total employees live in Stillwater, 480 or 22.5 percent live in Wisconsin, 458 or 20 percent live in Washington County outside of Stillwater, 385 or 18.5 percent live in Minneapolis /St. Paul and its suburbs and 1.5 percent live elsewhere. 4 DAT E R APPROVED - 0 _ 2 t • I. S Z Existing Land Use I I• HIGYTIHGAI F ' b I 1 1 • r r • . •` • • • • w • .• • • • • • r • • • • • , • • 1 / • • • • 1 Vacant \\ Single - Family Residential \ \\ \Multi- Family Residential Y, ), ( >�P.€t :i1, Commet —cial .— Office /Servira &/ Industrial • —1; 5 - I FILE NO. DRAWING NO. LAND USE No. of Type of Business Businesses Acres Percent 'Office /Service 70 49.5 11% 'Industrial 4 36 8% 'Retail 30 33.75 4.5% 'Restaurant 5 6.75 1.5% Residential - 22.5 5% Agricultural - 63 14% Vacant - 216 48% TOTAL 111 450 95% A survey of the current businesses in the Business Park area found that over 80 percent have no plans for expansion in the next five years. Thirteen businesses plan to expand within two years and nine more plan to expand within five years. They estimate that these expansions will add approximately 70,000 square feet of space and 140 -180 employees. Since there is over 150 of vacant land available for new commercial or industrial development, there is an adequate supply of vacant land available for growth. Zoning With the exception of the Benson Farm and township land west of County Road 5, the land in the study area is zoned Industrial Park, IP -I (Industrial) to IP -C (Commercial) as shown on Map 3 - Existing Zoning. These zoning classifications have the same setback, height, lot coverage and landscaping requirements and differ only in regard to the permitted and conditionally permitted land uses. 5 R4 PARK IP -I 1 < •'11 i t I I • 2RIFT WOO - .__ STA TE TRUNK HIOHWAY NO. 36 _ IP- I 00 1401 , . 1 1 • • . • C, P CURVE CRI. ST R H TOWER DR. W. • P. CLL 3 IP -I CORPORATE L/41/TS 1 r 1 4 ' . IP -C , II✓ R4 PARCEL 4 EXCEPT /ON .0 . 00,111 / . r 47.7 ACRES R4 Agriculture z WEST BUSINESS PARK • 1--- •I • j:� ° °II Ir t.+ r t • : • -. f/r 1 1 � A80or L_1 • EXISTING ZONING IP -C Industrial Park Commercial IP -C1 Industrial Park Commercial One IP -I Industrial Park The Benson Farm and the land west of County Road 5 are in Stillwater Township. These areas are zoned R4. R4 allows single family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet per dwelling unit. The township land west of County Road 5 consists of single family residential, with remaining agricultural designated land. The uses in both of these township areas are consistent with their current low density residential zoning. Land Use /Zoning Comparison A comparison of plan area existing Land Use and Zoning indicates that existing uses are generally consistent with zoning. The three Industrial Park zoning classifications (Industrial Park - Industrial, Industrial Park - Commercial and Industrial Park - Commercial One) are very similar. They are the same with regard to setback, landscaping, lot size requirements, maximum floor area and lot coverage. They are different with regard to the permitted and conditionally permitted uses. The major difference in the permitted use is that Industrial Park - Industrial, which comprises 80 percent of the Business Park area, does not allow retail activities. Most of the general retail in the Business Park is located along the Highway 36 Frontage Road in the area designated IP -C. The IP -C area comprises 15 percent of the Business Park. The remaining 5 percent is in the IP -C1 district. Office and service areas are located throughout the Industrial Park. This is consistent with the fact that there is not a zoning classification specifically for office /service use. Office uses are permitted in all their industrial park zoning classifications. Most of the office use are one or two story buildings with one tenant although there has been some recent development of small multi- tenant office buildings. Most of the industrial development is consistent with the Industrial Park - Industrial (IP -I) zoning classification. These developments are light industrial adjoining offices. No heavy industrial is permitted in the Business Park. Multiple family housing has also been developed in the area zoned Industrial Park - Industrial. The location of this development is on the fringe areas of the Park and is compatible with the surrounding areas uses. Transportation System There are a number of transportation issues which will affect the overall development plans for the West Stillwater Business Park. Some must be resolved prior to establishing land use in order to provide adequate access to the area and to specific land uses. 6 The main roadway connection to the metropolitan area from the business park is Highway 36, immediately south of the park. Highway 36 also provides access into Wisconsin and connects to Highway 95 for access north and south along the St. Croix Valley. Access to Highway 36 is via an interchange at County Road 5 and at signalized intersections at Washington Avenue, Greeley Street (Oasis Avenue) and South Fourth Street (Osgood Avenue). Minnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Transportation are considering building a new river crossing bridge. Both a south and central bridge corridor would utilize existing Highway 36. MnDOT anticipates upgrading Highway 36 to a freeway to connect to the bridge. This would eliminate the signalized intersections and require development of an interchange or interchanges. This would seriously change the access to the business park. The second major roadway serving the business park is County Road 5. County Road 5 provides access into Stillwater and connects to Highway 36, Lake Elmo. With the Highway 36 freeway concept of MnDOT, Highway 5 will carry much of the traffic generated from the business park. Access to County Road 5 should be restricted to major intersections to provide for smooth traffic flow and integrity of the roadway. Orleans Street is an existing intersection and should perpetuated. Similarly, there must be well designed high capacity intersection with both ramps from Highway 36. This concept will provide an opportunity for one additional major intersection between Orleans Street and Highway 36. It is anticipated that County Road 5 will be upgraded to four lanes with a raised median and left turn lanes. The major intersections eventually will be signalized. Major routes through the business park are Orleans Street and CUrve Crest Boulevard. Orleans Street is complete from Washington Avenue to County Road 5 and Major routes through the Business Park, east to west, are West Orleans Street and Curve Crest Boulevard. Orleans Street runs from Washington Avenue to County Road 5 and Curve Crest Boulevard from Washington Avenue to Greeley Street. Comprehensive plans have always shown completion of Curve Crest Boulevard from Washington Avenue to County Road 5. The alignment has been subject to discussion among City staff and MnDOT representatives. Since it is going to be built utilizing Municipal State -Aid funds, it must meet minimum design standards. Using these standards and the potential location of the intersection on County Road 5, a single layout for the roadway alignment has been proposed. This provides straight sections approaching COunty Road 5 and 30 mph deign speed curves. This also provides flexibility in the location of intersections for the internal street system. The alignment is shown on Map 5. Orleans Street would be extended to the east to an existing alignment to connect south to Curve Crest Boulevard east of Northwestern Avenue. This will provide,a second major access from the business park to County Road 5. 7 ON 9NIMd2i0 3 L.a40a l3 aMas /aa4PM '"'' samLpf 3140 Mn /DOT's proposals have always shown a frontage road as an important connecting street. However, by providing access via both Curve Crest Boulevard and Orleans Street, the frontage road becomes less important. It therefore can be connected through variety of routes to Curve Crest Boulevard rather than directly to County Road 5. This will eliminate potential operational problems created by an additional intersection on County Road 5. Local streets can be connected to serve the department. Tower Drive or Woodland Lakes Drive could both be extended into the area previously proposed for the Woodland Lakes Development. The north end of the Business Park area is proposed for an extension of the single family housing. It would be very desirable to prevent any type of through traffic movement from accessing this development. However, it is desireable to eliminate the existing long cul de sac of Pine Tree Trail. Extension of the Pine Tree Trail to a connection at Orleans Street ultimately connecting to Greeley Street would be desirable. No connection should be made between Pine Tree Trail with proposed Orleans Street to the west. These concepts are shown on Map 5. Access to the area west of County Road 5 is also of concern. Orleans Avenue extended becomes Wild Pine Land and connects to the existing Croixwood Development. Additional access to the west could be at the extension of Curve Crest Boulevard. This would provide access to a location near 62nd Street and would provide the undeveloped area with reasonable access. This connection will allow a number of different roadway alignments for access tot he undeveloped area. The ultimate connection to COunty Road 15 can take many different routes. It would be desireable not to connect this new roadway to existing 62nd Street to prevent through traffic from driving on a residential neighborhood. The concept for the roads does provide the ability to handle the high volume of traffic which could be attracted from a successful business park. It can still provide a reasonable amount of access for individual properties and for different methods of developing the properties. Utilities Map 4 shows existing utility locations. A majority of the West Business Park has electric, gas and sewer service along with an adequate road system to support development. Two areas however do not have utility services or road systems. These areas are the Benson Farm and the Woodland Lake /Long Lake area. It is the City of Stillwater policy to build utility service on an "as needed" basis. Therefore, utility service at the Woodland Lakes site and Benson Farm will be extended when these areas are ready for development. Service extensions into these undeveloped areas will occur with 8 the extension of streets as required for new development. Washington Avenue and the Frontage Road are the nearest locations to the Woodland Lakes site for sewer and water service. There are gas and electric lines located along County Road 5 and at Orleans Street. Sewer lines connect with the Lily Lake lift station just northeast of the Business Park. Sewer lines have adequate capacity to handle new development. New development at the Woodland Lakes site will require a sewer lift station. Utility service can be provided to the Benson Farm area from Orleans Street. The existing lines are able to handle sanitary sewer flows and provide water service to the area. Storm sewers may also be extended from the existing Business Park. Stillwater Township land located west of the Woodland Lakes site does not have utility services. There is a natural drainage way between County Road 5 and Long Lake which provides storm water drainage to the Woodland Lakes site and Croixwood. The land west of County Road 5 can be serviced when the area is ready for development. Area Design The West Stillwater Business Park is characterized by new commercial and industrial building, with wide streets, large parking lots, street trees and lawn area. Recent new development maximize lot coverage with building an parking areas. The building material varies by type of building and location. Industrial building tend to be of block construction rough or smooth faced and colored. Office buildings are predominately constructed of brick with more architectural detail. Retail buildings varies from split face block to metal sided buildings. Commercial buildings along Greeley tend to be metal sided with some exceptions. Streets in the Industrial Park are wide with a median separation in Curve Crest Boulevard and Washington Avenue. Front setback areas are usually plated with street trees and grass. Most truck and loading areas are concealed to the side or rear of buildings. Signage in the Business Park varies by business type. Office and industrial uses have low profile signage while retial uses located along the Frontage Road exhibits large 25 high free standing signs. All signage to the north of Tower Drive is lower ground signs or architecturally designed directory signs. No signage or design treatment mark the entries to the Business Park. Development Trends A study of new construction between 1980 and 1988 indicates that development activity in increasing. The study considered all commercial development that occurred in Stillwater for a nine year period. Most new commercial development over the past nine years has taken place in the Industrial Park area with some exceptions 9 val DN ONI WI 80 sow Li `N- - - 11 I • 3 • • v. 41 OP& : INO 3•Vl I i 1 21_ : . 301S1lik • —1• OloyN a 1,-1 • ask. em.e ft • / v 43-76- ••• 12.4y 0 > ••••..; • 4..; • 0 NOSNI1 ' I I \ • 4 1 • • s • •. //ss „fr , o r tot 4 4 • 4 4 4 . 1 4 0 -1 77-7- 7111 0 . ON 3113 Hill 2 spPo1 maN xxxxxze t • a 11 I „LH`JIN , • 1 sppc:Qi MJ sisy., 03 ••) . . - 'woe lvitusnoNt 1 . 3Av Nans3P.H.LsoN 0 • 3 IVO (motels and restaurants). The figures show that over the nine year period nearly one million square feet of commercial floor area has been constructed or an average 90,000 square feet per year. The general trend for development activity has increased over the nine year period from and additional 26,000 square feet and 23,000 square feet for 1982 and 1983 to 236,000 square feet and 161,500 square feet in 1987 and 1988. This is a ten- fold annual increase in commercial floor space production from 1983 to 1987. All economic sectors with the exception of the visitor sector (restaurants and motels) have followed the upward trend. Seventy -five percent of increased industrial floor area has occurred in 1987 and 1988 with the expansion of two local industries. Using the past average growth rate as an indicator, the amount of land needed to support new development can be estimated. Approximately five acres of land is needed per year to provided for the 1980 -1999 growth rate. There are over 150 acres of vacant land available for industrial and commercial development in the study area. This represents adequate supply land to support development for at least a twenty year period or through the 2010. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following Goals and Objectives has been developed to guide future development in the West Stillwater Business Park area: Land Use - Encourage new land uses consistent with existing uses. - Provide adequate land for industrial development for the next twenty years. - Provide for a compatible mix of industrial, office, service, commercial and community uses through the area land use plan. Road System - Use planned unit development concept to functionally and visually coordinate the development of large industrial, commercial and residential sites. - Buffer commercial or industrial land uses from residential area with special setbacks, fences and landscape buffering. - Adopt road location for extension of Curve Crest Boulevard to County Road 5 (see proposed Road 10 Location Map). - Review designs to coordinate access to street with site development. Connect Pine Tree Trail with West Orleans Street as a residential collector street. - Coordinate the improvement of Curve Crest Boulevard and Highway 36 improvements with Washington County Public Works, MnDOT and Stillwater Township. - Through new road design and road location, minimize "cut through" traffic from residential areas to commercial areas. Utility - Phase the expansion of water, sewer and drainage facility to accommodate new development. - Size new sanitary pump station to accommodate sewer service to the Long Lake planning area. - Provide pedestrian access through the Industrial Park from residential areas to commercial and recreational areas. Park and Open Space - Provide location for neighborhood park in Benson Farm area. - Maintain sloped area around Lily Lake in open space. - Connect Benson Farm residential area with Lily Lake Park and Lily Lake elementary school by a pedestrian trail. Area Design - Adopt design guidelines for new development to encourage compatible quality new development. - All electrical, telephone, cable lines shall be underground. - Require adequately screened parking and loading facilities. - Special sign guidelines shall be developed to provide for low profile signage in industrial, office 11 COOPERATION and service area consistent with site development design. - No pole type building, standard concrete block or building with metal siding shall be allowed in the West Industrial Park area. - All parking areas shall be buffered or screened with landscaping to minimize the visual impact of cars and large expanses of asphalt. - Develop West Stillwater Business Park entrance plan for County Road 5 corridor and require special landscaped, setback, signage controls and combined access for development that corridor. - Work with Stillwater Township, Washington County, MnDOT, Baytown Township and the City of Oak Park Heights in planning for and implementing the West Stillwater Business Park Plan. 12 MI LLS/ . • LAN • R OvEO i N I I P,)416.■\,‘. %•\Z* toptrs ■Se.- 44 W4Eti Vereg •I‘kL ‘NS k*410 P roposed Land Use r f 1 4 'a� Sin gle - famil y \ \\ \,iu Residential • family Residential =O ,ff � /Service . X4/4v mrnun; t„ H 1_, " --J FILE NO DRAWING NO . t Er cs e 0 Proposed Zoning Zoning \ Class ificati on RA \\\ RB BP-0 BP-C MNSP-I n • - - 1 L.L...2_1j_ FIL E NO. OR AW !NG NO. — I N 3 1110 AUPIE LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan provides direction for the future development of the Business Park Area. In developing the Land Use Plan, the following factors were considered: Land Use Goals and Objectives, existing land uses, compatibility of various land use activities, past development trends and commercial and industrial land needs, future plans for new development and the relationship of planning area land uses to areas surrounding the Business Park area. Land Use Goals and Objectives are listed below: - Encourage new land uses consistent with exiting uses. - Provide adequate land for industrial development for the - Provide for a compatible mix of industrial, office, area land use plan. next twenty years. service, commercial and community uses through - Used planned unit development concept to functionally and visually coordinate the development of large industrial, commercial and residential sites. - Buffer commercial or industrial land uses from residential area with special setbacks and landscape buffering. The Land Use Map, Map 6, shows a mix of residential, commercial office and Industrial land uses. Areas currently outside of the City without City services are designated Single Family and Multifamily residences. The Long Lake area shows single family lands along and north of 62nd Street. A multifamily area is designated along Highway 36 in back of existing residences facing 62nd Street North. An open space area is designated between the new road accessing the Multifamily area and County Road 5. Some of this land is currently owned by the City of Stillwater and is used as a tree growing area. A low drainage area also passes through this site. The other residential area is the 80 acres Benson Farm. The map shows single family (four dwelling units per acre) for the lands adjacent to the existing Pine Tree Trail residential area and Lily Lake. Higher density 8 to 10 Du's. /acre is shown for the area located between the single family area and the existing Business Park. A neighborhood park is shown in the southeast corner of the development area. The Benson Farm area, because of its size and single ownership, is designated a special site and will require a planned unit developed 13 to coordinate the residential uses, road system and neighborhood park (see special site section). The Land Use Plan shows the Business Park area between County Road 5 and South Greeley as a mix of Business Park - Commercial, Office and Industrial uses. Business Park Commercial lands are located along the major transportation corridors State Highway 36 and its Frontage Road and to a lesser extend County Road 5. Approximately 65 acres of Industrial Park - Commercial lands are designated. Major commercially designated sites include the old Woodlands Lake site contain 48 acres and vacant land off the Frontage Road and Tower containing the remaining 17 acres. The retail designation allows retail, office, services, restaurants and hotel /motels similar to the mix of uses currently located in the IP -C district. Two special sites, special site #1 and special site #2 are located in the Business Park - Commercial Area. Land Use district use definitions for the Business Park districts follows this section. The Business Park - Office district runs along the south side of Curve Crest Boulevard from west of Washington Avenue to Northwestern. An 8 acre site south of Orleans is also designated office. About half of.the area is currently developed with office and related uses and 10 acres are vacant. The Business Park - Office District allows office uses as the primary use and retail, warehouse and wholesale uses with special review. The Business Park - Industrial District is shown south of Orleans on both east and west sides of Washington Avenue. Forty -five acres of the 50 acre designated Industrial, is currently vacant. Two subdivisions totaling 23 acres have recently been approved within the district. The subdivision breaks the land up into 2 area to 5 acre sites. The BP -I district allows limited manufacturing and office areas. Warehouse, wholesale trade and limited retail are allowed with special review. Major City industrial expansion would take place in the IP -I district. 14 BUSINESS PARK, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (BP -I) Permitted Uses: a. WEST STILLWATER BUSINESS PARK LANE USE DISTRICTS Limited manufacturing conducting a process, fabrication, storage or including electronic components and accessories. b. Automotive painting, upholstering, tire recapping and major repair an enclosed building. c. Research laboratories. d. Business, professional and medical office services. e. Finance, insurance and real estate office services. Special Permitted Uses: a. Radio and television facilities. b. Printing, publishing and allied industries. c. General warehousing and outside storage. d. Outside storage (must be screened). e. Mini - storage. f. Wholesale trade. g. Commercial nurseries. h. Retail sales of products manufactured on site so long as no more than 20 percent of building floor area is for retail purposes. i. Cultural or governmental facilities (movie theatres, libraries, fire stations). 15 manufacturing light materials when conducted completely in BUSINESS PARK - COMMERCIAL (BP -C) Permitted Uses: a. Wholesale trade. b. Retail - general merchandise. c. Specialty retial. d. Food - retail. e. Eating and drinking places and cafes. f. Finance, insurance and real estate office services. g. Personal services (dry cleaning, beauty salons, etc.). h. Business, professional and medical office services. i. Fast food outlets. Special Permitted Uses: a. Retail trade not previously specified. b. Cultural facilities (movie theatres, libraries, art galleries, theatres). c. Auto repair and related services. 1. Day care facilities, including preschools. e. Hotel /Motels. f. Outside sales areas. g. Drive through business. h. Commercial nurseries. 16 BUSINESS PARK - OFFICE (BP -0) Permitted Uses: a. Business, professional and medical office services. b. Finance, insurance and real estate office services. c. Research facilities. Special Permitted Uses: a. Governmental and educational institutions. b. Day care facilities, including preschool. c. Wholesale trade. d. Retail - general merchandise. e. Eating and drinking places and cafes. f. Cultural facilities (theatres, libraries, museums, art galleries, etc.) g. Warehousing and inside storage. 30 !Bid S dvw •M •t) L 3M01 / 11 9 Z UAW 1S 18D 3ntin3 ti 2 21332:111d 113D!! ti IS SNV311:10 M 2 Z S D IV 7 31 t1Yod11o) '6N WM H'J I H ANTI T 64 ; u ii . d 6, v p %V r n z ONOd Nil Vd N1 51 /W /7 311*/ .9 — -I - 6 _ co/ a 133 —J J 1011 S ?d s3ivtLb ili1 t IZI � s1 r / r louno a A% -7 vor7J-LSs N'Z n9 m - 6/ -1 f m n r L_ 1pt uaa uosua+fJ, 1S SNV3180 M 1 z - 1 — i l I:1 n H I I-r a act Minimum requirements for lot area, width, frontage, height, yards, ground floor area for BP -I, BP -0 and BP -C Districts SETBACK ABUTTING LOT FROM RESIDENTIAL MAXIMUM USE PUBLIC SIDEYARD DISTRICTS REAR YARD HEIGHT LOT SYMBOL DISTRICT LOT AREA LOT WIDTH STREET SETBACK (ANY YARD) SETBACK LIMITATIONS (COVERAGE) BP -I 1 ACRE 200 FEET 40 FEET 20 FEET 75 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET 60% BP -C 1/2 ACRE 100 FEET 40 FEET 20 FEET 75 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET 60% BP -0 1 ACRE 200 FEET 40 FEET 20 FEET 75 FEET 30 FEET 40 FEET 60% SPECIAL SITES Four special sites present special opportunities for new development because of their size, single ownership or location. See Special Sites Maps 8, 9 and 10. Site #1 and #2 are commercial sites located at the corner of County Road 5 and Highway 36. Special Site #1, a 36 acre site, is bounded by County Road 5 to the west, Curve Crest Boulevard to the north, undeveloped land off of Washington Street to the east, and the Frontage Road to the south. The site is a part of the old Woodland Lakes project. It has been graded for drainage and road improvements. This site represents the best location in the Plan Area for a commercial center. The Land Use Plan designates this site Business Park - Commercial (BP -C). The commercial designation allows a range of retial and office uses. A Planned Unit Development permit is required for this site to coordinate access, uses and project design. It is the intent of the Planned Unit Development approach to have an overall plan for the site before any development occurs. Through the PUD process, a coordinated landscape plan, site design, access, landscaping, signage and parking program plan can be achieved and development opportunity is maximized. 18 • Site #2 is located just north of Curve Crest Boulevard part of County Road 5. This site was also a part of the Woodland Lakes development. A PUD plan is required for this site, perhaps coordinated with Site 1. The design of this site and its appearance from County Road 5 is of particular importance. As with Site #1, coordinated architecture, landscaping, signage, parking and access shall be required. No signage shall be directed from the north of the center to County Road 5 and Special landscape setbacks required for this Stillwater entrance. Site #3 - Benson Farm. The Benson Farm is designated single family and multifamily in the land use plan. The area adjacent to the Pine Tree Tail residential area and around Lily Lake is designated single family and the south portion of the site located along extended West Orleans multifamily residential. The street plan for the area shows Pine Tree Trail connecting to West Orleans Street as a residential collector street. A neighborhood sized park, 5 -10 acres, is located in the southeast corner of the site. The Benson Farm is not currently in the City of Stillwater. When the area is ready to develop, a conceptional Planned Unit Development plan showing land use, residential densities, buffer area, park lands, road system and open space area should be presented to the City with a request for annexation. If the plan meets with City approval the required annexation request, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and MUSA line extension can be processed with the Metropolitan Council and State Municipal Board. Site #4 - Industrial Sites. These sites should be protected to make sure they are available for future industrial expansion. This can be done with subdivision regulations and land use controls, City acquisition of sites or incentive for industrial development. Industrial lands next to the Benson Farm residential area should have special setbacks and landscaping to minimize the impact on the residential area. 19 DESIGN GUIDELINES Design guidelines have been developed for the West Stillwater Business District to ensure consistent quality design. The guidelines will be used to review new development proposals. Architectural Standards 1. Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, standard concrete block or metal siding shall not be used as exterior materials for new buildings. Architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels may be acceptable. 2. All roof or ground mounted mechanical equipment or exterior trash storage areas shall be completely enclosed with building material compatible with the principle structure. Low profile self contained mechanical units which blend in with the building design located to the side or rear of the building may be permitted. 3. Architectural consistency on all sides of the building is required in terms of colors, material and details. Landscape. Standards 1. Street trees shall be required for all new development. The type of tree and their location shall be approved by the Director of Parks. 2. All area of a lot not used or improved for parking, driveways or storage areas shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, flower and ground cover. 3. All new trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from a growing site with a tree spade and be a 2 -1/2 inch caliber for deciduous trees, 6 foot in height for evergreens and 1 -1/2 inch caliber for ornamental trees. 4. No more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be of one species. No trees shall be American Elms, Box Elder, Poplar or Fearcele Ginko. 5. A minimum 20 -foot wide landscaped front yard setback area shall be maintained along all public streets and 10 foot side yard landscaped area maintained on all other sides. 6. A minimum of 10 percent of parking and driveway areas shall be landscaped with trees and shrubs. 7. All utilities must be underground and utility meters screened or integrated into the building structure. Signs 1. Signs and related building graphics shall be a part of the overall building and site design. Sign size, height, 20 location and material shall relate to building scale and design. 2. Wall signs or low profile (maximum 6 feet in height) shall be permitted for office, warehouse, wholesale or industrial uses. 3. Retail signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. 4. A landscaped area equal to twice the sign area comprised of bushes or flowers shall be provided around the base of free standing signs. 5. Multi - tenant buildings may have a low profile free standing building or site location sign as well as individual tenant signs. Site Plan 1. On -site lighting shall be relative to the overall site and building design and serve functional safety and aesthetic purposes. 2. Overall lighting shall be directed down and shielded from adjacent properties or roadways. All lights shall be contained on the property. 3. Maximum height of parking lot lighting shall be 20 feet to minimize impact on surrounding residential areas. 4. Parking shall be screened from the street by berming, bushes, low walls or changes in the grade of parking areas. 5. All loading areas shall be located to the rear or side of the building and screened and buffered from building on adjacent lots. 6. Parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent residential areas by a solid masonry wall or equivalent 10 feet of landscaped gutter on the commercial side of the wall. 7. All outside storage areas shall be screened with opaque fencing and landscaping that will grow up three years to cover 50 percent of the fence face area. 8. Sidewalks shall be provided between residential areas and commercial destinations, schools and park areas. 21 4 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM In order to carry out the Goals and Objectives and Land Use Plan, implementation actions are required. Some of the actions are ongoing or will take place in response to actions taken by developers or other jurisdictions. Other implementation impacts are the responsibility of the City and are necessary to carry out the policy contained in the Plan. Actions in this category include zoning amendments, street alignment approval and adoption of Design Guidelines. Together the public action along private activities will result in implementation of the West Stillwater Business Park Plan. Implementation Actions Land Use 1. Amend existing zoning classifications and regulations to implement the Land Use Plan. 2. Prepare Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Municipal Urban Service area Amendments and annexations petition as required to implement the plan and assist in the development of the area. 3. Assist in preparation of specific plans or Planned Unit Developments for large development areas, including the Woodland Lakes site, Benson Farm or large multi -use development sites. ROAD SYSTEM 4. Adopt road,plan as part of City Comprehensive Plan for Curve Crest Boulevard , West Orleans Street and Pine Tree Trail extended. 5. Review impacts on the West Stillwater Business Park of MnDOT plans to upgrade State Highway 36 to a freeway and limit access to County Road 5 and South Greeley Street. UTILITIES 6. Develop capital improvement program indicating phasing and estimating costs for street, water, sewer line and drainage improvements in the Business Park. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE 7. Develop plan for Benson Farm neighborhood park and coordinate with other community facilities. 8. Assist school district in possible expansion of Lily Lake School Campus. 9. Require open space easement for sloped area around Lily Lake. 22 AREA DESIGN 10. Adopt Design Guideline and Use to review new development. 11. Prepare Design Plan for County Road 5 entry way into the City of Stillwater and the Business Park. COORDINATION AND COOPERATION 12. Work with Washington County, Stillwater Township, MnDOT and School District #834 on implementation of the plan. 13. Promote the Business Park development through various public /private partnerships such as SADEC and the Chamber of Commerce. 23 /ez , 5..,r.! / - /S -g9 Rzv/3 ?( /"? • • inr AWSIPEH • ENGINEERS CHITECTS ■ PLANNERS SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. TO: STEVE RUSSELL FROM: GLEN VAN WORMER DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1990 SUBJ: PINE TREE TRAIL TRAFFIC STUDY SEH FILE NO: 89114 MEMORANDUM 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 Based on comments received at a public meeting, we reviewed a number of concerns that were expressed by area residents. We also reviewed the traffic numbers which we calculated earlier. We estimate that the existing traffic volume on Pine Tree Trail just south of Pine Street is 420 vehicles per day. The volume on Pine Tree Trail at the turn in the road is approximately 130 vehicles per day. The concept which was developed by the Business Park committee was to connect Pine Tree Trail south to Orleans Street just west of Linson Circle to provide access from Pine Tree Trail to Orleans Street and Greeley Street. There would be no connection from Pine Tree Trail to Curve Crest Boulevard or to any of the other streets in the Business Park area. Access would only be to either Pine Street or to Orleans Street and Greeley Street. If this connection is made and single family housing units are developed along the entire stretch from the end of Pine Tree Trail to Orleans Street, the volume of traffic just south of Pine Street would be approximately 360. Some of the traffic from the new homes along the new portion of Pine Tree Trail would travel north to Pine Street as part of their trip to the downtown area 5T PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN • • • Memorandum February 2, 1990 or other Stillwater destinations. However, these would be offset by trips originating from existing dwelling units oriented towards Highway 36 for travel to the Metropolitan specific destination within the Business Park. movement would consist of right turns onto Greeley Curve Crest Boulevard as opposed to left turns onto Pine County Road 5 and Orleans Street. existing turn in the road on Pine Tree approximately 270 trips per day. Volumes the connection to vehicles. Pine Tree Trail would be The area or a southbound Street and Street, Volume of traffic at the Trail would grow to on Orleans Street at approximately 480 We looked at the potential for traffic to use Pine Tree Trail as a short cut. The only traffic which could conceivably utilize this would be traffic which currently uses Pine Street and Greeley Street. It is unlikely that traffic would pull off of County Road 5 onto Pine Street and use Pine Tree Trail and Orleans Street to reach Greeley Street. It is unlikely that any traffic oriented towards the Business Park would travel down Pine Tree Trail since it would have to travel back onto either County Road 5 or Greeley Street for part of its trip. Comparison of using Pine Street and Greeley Street to using Pine Tree Trail seems to indicate that the Pine Street and Greeley Street connection' is more direct and quicker. If the design created some indirection along Pine Tree Trail, the likelihood of any thru traffic is very low. We reviewed the option of having two cul -de -sac roads, one coming from Pine Tree Trail and the second coming from Orleans Street. A cul -de -sac from Pine Tree Trail, because of the nature of the land directly surrounding it, would probably result in some additional dwelling units being built around the- cul -de -sac and • • • Memorandum February 2, 1990 Page #3 around a second cul -de -sac which would be immediately south of the present turn in the road on Pine Tree Trail. This concept would place approximately 540 vehicle trips per day just south of Pine Street and 240 trips at the existing turn in the road. The other cul -de -sac, to the south, would generate approximately 320 vehicle trips per day at the Orleans Street and Pine Tree Trail intersection. It is also possible that Pine Tree Trail would be extended further south, lengthening the cul -de -sac. This would occur if it were impossible to obtain the additional right -of -way necessary to extend a cul -de -sac north from Orleans Street. If the entire single family area were developed by an extension of Pine Tree Trail, approximately 780 trips per day would take place just south of Pine Street. Traffic at the existing turn in the road would increase to 490. We also looked at a number of other concepts for development of different amounts of single family and multiple family dwelling units on the existing Benson farm. Very little reduction in traffic on Pine Tree Trail could be achieved under any. Under several, the volumes would actually increase by anywhere from 40 to 450 vehicles. The intersection of Pine Street and Pine Tree Trail has some very undesirable grades as was pointed out at the public meeting. We do not see any easy way of rectifying the problems which currently exist without major reconstruction of either Pine Street or Pine Tree Trail or both. • • • Memorandum February 2, 1990 Page #4 There was also concern expressed over the Greeley Street inter- section with Orleans Street. We discussed some of the operational problems along Greeley Street with Washington County and felt that it would be possible to develop a painted series of turn lanes from north of Greeley Street south to Highway 36. The County thought this might be an improvement in operations, especially at the Curve Crest Boulevard intersection. Individuals indicated that trucks were currently utilizing Pine Tree Trail. We carefully reviewed the area and found only one set of dual tire tracks, and that apparently from a sanding truck. There are no marks anywhere indicating how a semi - trailer might have turned around. At the time we checked it, there had been no significant snowfall for over a month. If trucks are a problem, signs could be posted at the Pine Tree Trail and Pine Street intersection indicating "No Trucks ". You also pointed out a very valid concern about the exceptionally long length of the cul -de -sac on Pine Tree Trail. The concept of retaining the cul -de -sac and serving the proposed single family area with additional cul-de-sacs would create a series of similar long cul -de -sacs. Extending a road from Orleans Street to the area of Willard Street and West Street north of the Lily Lake School does not appear viable because of the limited distance for two sided development on the east side of Lily Lake School. We have made some drawings showing some of the alternatives and prepared a drawing for the Greeley Street turn lanes. We will bring these to the Council meeting and discuss them further with the Council if you wish. GVW /cih �....:. r7 C m BLVD. 31s a r A m r g 0 A S. WASH :NG O C r O H m N N tN OUT LOT tr 0 G (4.1 � i N yt A L I � INSO.N. -.G R AVENUE) N • 0 r m Z N Z z 1 . 0 0 --1 C) m • ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LJ H FTbg. - - 11 -1 N;I�►I " g N 0 — — rD 1 — gVERETT ?3 _-- 33 N O . Of r .MARTHA " I °I HARIVET" LA DR, I r 1 t I I t t — t r - -- - - - - - - - - - • • ST. m rn tot Cy r L • • - Iam44iah 4NHHHH � VIII/ O h PARCEL 1 OUTLOT 1 I 1 2 .§-c" NN. COTTAGE DR . W ORLEANS AV ENU I / C� PARCEL2 cri Cri CURVE CREST BLVD. 2 i 2 W 6 1 - 5 6 PARCEL 3 OUTLOT 6 PARCEL 4 - CORPORATE L /M /TS J MINIM VI NC I OUTLOT A OUTLOT C / 2 0 • 0 t 2 3 -j 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 10 I \ 1 e. 2R 32 3 / W 47.7 ACRES 4 /r4` 1�Lh 7 i 4 5 3 2 2� / 1y 4 V I - . V) 3 AiOS Oeuef3p 1 6 1 5 0 9 12 1 11 14 W 13 1 6 to 12 IUI' 14 13 4 7 )3 1 1 4 11 --c7 —/7—H 4 4 615 I 8 7 12 w 1 1 1 II °I e 9 L 2/ I PARK 15 FOND 7 1 1 3 4 2 � 6 3 12 W I 2U WILLARD 12 1 1 6 I 1 A BBOTT L 6 I 5 W ._. _ 6 7 i � W ;Ht_RCHILL 1 1 6 ( 1 12 // 1 8 7 1 12 ANDERSON { 3 161 7 I 6 1 6 6 I 1 6 2 7 I 12 7 1 / 15 VE 6 7 6 ( 1 6 ---- /O - 7 1 12 7 611;1 f 7 8 4- SIs r S. WASHING AVENUE) •a . • A r E z 2 1 0 A r s N u OVTLOT + LINSQ.i IR S u U - AD rn t • y 1 0 m z N Q s Z � 9 T 1 NOI. H L u 01 f N 1 r N ; -r 1 N • LN.; .. /� LAKEI L -v z • r DI .TR A-L V ----- 31.. 74, E a— —u — r - , RETT Z 1 v ZN 1 - r. MARTHA L: - 0. - 2_, U L ; S T -- a m ST. ^` N ti S. -4 v 1 a J 111111 • AD SIS • N w N u N AVENUE) 0 C • O m 0 . I N coo N 1 4 m 9 0 — i —1 G) m ti 1 J T ' _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H'r . _ ;3 t11-1 O. a 1 1 1 -a i o. II 4E P `iREt TR Al , LAKE • 5S 4 w a . n I _� "T L__- N G L::::::I: aIN O51°) O" 1 I .4. • _ uta A RI 61 t X - a V w _ _ YK ii U v u • To: Mayor Wally Abrahamson Stillwater City Council From: Myron T. Pike Date: February 5, 1990 Subject: West Stillwater Business Park Plan Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the Feb. 6 council meeting when the West Stillwater Business Park development plan will be discussed, but I do wish to express my views on this plan. As a south Pine Tree Trail resident I am of course concerned about the plan for and the subsequent development of the West Stillwater Business Park. In general I am quite pleased with the plan that was prepared by the planning committee and accepted by the Stillwater Planning Commission with regard to land use, park and open space, and area design. The plan for the industrial/business area south of Orleans Street appears to me to be well conceived, complete and well- suited to Stillwater's character and growth needs. However, I feel the plan for the Benson Farm area is woefully inadequate. Furthermore, I strongly object to the only detail spelled out • for this area in the plan which is the proposal to extend Pine Tree Trail south to connect with West Orleans Street. Both terminal intersections (Pine St. with Pine Tr. T1. and W. Orleans with Greeley St.) of this proposed new through street are already dangerous. To expect them to handle safely the increased traffic which will inevitably result if this plan were to be carried out is irresponsible. The planning commission in their review of this plan on Jan. 8, acknowledged that this was not a workable proposal but chose to accept the overall plan anyway with a comment to the effect that this problem would be up to the developer to resolve. I believe that the city council should reject this plan until a reasonable proposal for roads to handle the traffic to and from the Benson Farm area is included. Myron T. Pike 811 Pine Tree Trail • Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 439 -4588 Respectfully, • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. PUD/89- 82- SUB/89 -83 Planning Commission Meeting: January 8, 1990 Project Location: Northeast corner of Highway 5 and Orleans Street. Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Zoning District: RA /PUD Applicant's Name: Heritage Development Corporation Type of Application: Mixed Use PUD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modification to a previously approved mixed use residential /retail /office PUD and resubdivision. DISCUSSION: The PUD amendment request is for a 7.04 acre portion of a 13.38 acre site that previously received City Council approval PUD /89 -3 (see attached site plan). The previously approved plan was comprised of 56 townhouse apartments along Cottage Drive, two commercial buildings of 10,000 square feet and 24,900 square feet, a one stall car wash and a 45,000 square foot three level office building. The previous PUD approval included the 2.22 acre Erickson Post site • at the corner of County Road 5 and West Orleans. The plans envisioned removing the gas station and relocating it in the 24,000 commercial center. No subdivision was submitted with the PUD plan but that was to follow before development. Since February 21, 1989, no subdivision or development plans have been submitted and the owners of Erickson Post have indicated they are no longer participating in the project. The amendment proposal before the City at this time is for the 54 housing units portion of the project located along Cottage Drive. The request is to amend the 54 apartment unit approval and replace it with 84 units of townhouse condominiums units. Elevations of the previously approved 54 unit apartment project are provided along with possible typical elevations for the proposal. The new proposal would include 14 sixplex units; 8 located off of Cottage Drive and 6 located off of a 34 foot cul -de -sac, Terrace Court Street. The existing plat for the area shows the utility drainage easement bisecting the site from north, Cottage Drive to South, West Orleans. Also, a utility drainage easement is shown around existing pond. Both of these existing easements would have to be redefined on the new plat to conform to the new development arrangement. The drainage /utility easement will have to be relocated as shown on sheet no. 3 of the plans submitted. The pond area shows a storage capacity of 2.0 acre feet. From previous studies and 7.0 acre feet of storage capacity is necessary. This is a substantial increase in easement area and may result in the loss of the residential building at the corner of Cottage Drive and County Road 5. The Terrace Court Street does not meet the right -of -way or cul -de -sac requirement of the City for minor streets. A 60 410 foot right -of -way is required with 32 feet curb to curb street. The cul -de -sac right -of -way requirement is 60 feet radius with 45 foot turn around radius. With a 60 foot right -of -way width, the six buildings located around the cul -de -sac do not met the setback requirements (30 feet). The grading plan shows slopes in excess of 3:1. Any slopes greater than 3:1 will require an approved retaining structure. A grading permit shall be required before any site development occurs. Because all grading shall be done at one time and the staged nature of the project, the graded area shall be replanted to protect against wind and water erosion as part of the grading operation (see comments regarding erosion control from the City Engineer). No sewer service is available to the site at this time although it is scheduled to be constructed this Spring. Until sewer service is assured, and completion date established, no building permits should be issued. A landscape plan is provided showing a variety of evergreen and decidious trees. A building planting detail is shown with ornamental trees, evergreen and decidious shrubs. The plantings for each stage of construction should be in before the development site is finalized for occupancy. The pond area landscaping shall be installed when grading is completed and construction of the first phase begins. This will minimize erosion and begin establishing the wetland vegetation. Other site plan details including the location and screensing of trash receptacles and utilities are not shown. All utilities shall underground to the site and all electrical boxes or gas meters screened with landscaping or compatible architectural detail. • Two parking spaces are provided for each unit. One space is covered in a garage and the other space is parked tantum behind the covered space. No off street parking is provided for guests. It is suggested that two spaces of guest parking be provided per six -plex. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with Conditions of Approval. 1. Approval of PUD /89 -3 is rescinded with this approval. 2. No building permits shall be issued until sanitary sewer service is available to the site. 3. A sidewalk shall be installed along the north and east side of Cottage Drive (the cost of the sidewalks shall be shared 50/50 by the developer of the Cottages and the developer of the condominiums.) 4. All utilities shall be undergrounded. 5. All electrical boxes and gas meters shall be located so they cannot be seen from public streets or screened with landscaping or architectural detail compatible with the building. 6. Comments from the City Engineer contained in the letter dated January 3, 1990 shall be met. Landscaping for the Pond Area shall be installed after initial grading • and before first phase construction. • • 8. A grading permit with erosion control measures shall be required before grading begins. 9. New utilities easements for the sewer line and pond shall be shown in the final plat. 10. Building 1, if it remains, shall be set back 40 feet from County Road 5. 11. Landscaping for each site shall be completed within six months of completion of each building site. (The developer shall provide a cash deposit of 125% of the contract costs of landscaping improvements to ensure their installation.) 12. All lawn areas shall be sodded. 13. The developer shall assure the City that all landscaping is established and healthy for a two year period after inital planting. 14. The trash receptacles shall be screened with a structure compatible with the design of the residential structures. 15. The Terrace Court right -of -way shall be 34 feet and cul -de -sac radius 46 feet with a 10 foot utility easement on either side of the street. 16. A final plat shall be recorded before building permits are issued. 17. Two guest parking spaces shall be provided for each six -plex. 18. No slopes on site shall have a slope of more than 3:1 without an approved retaining wall. ATTACHMENTS: Property Plan SUB/89 -83, PUD/89 -82 Letter from SEH dated January 3, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned. • • • • • =SEN ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS I PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490 -2000 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. January 3, 1990 Mr. Steve Russell, Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Russell: We have reviewed the preliminary plans by Heritage Development Company for Orleans Terrace. The plan includes a preliminary plat, preliminary development plan, preliminary utility plan, preliminary grading and drainage plan, preliminary landscape plan and existing topography. The right -of -way indicated for Terrace Court and cul -de -sac is 34 feet for the straight portion and 46 foot radius for the cul -de- sac. The zoning code requires a 60 foot right -of -way for a minor street and a 60 foot radius for a cul -de -sac. Therefore, the preliminary plat does not meet the subdivision code regulations. The existing utility and drainage easements are also indicated on the preliminary plat. These do not correspond with the utility location indicated on the preliminary utility plan. New easements will be required for utilities and the detention basin and drainage system. The grading plan indicates some 2 -1/2:1 slopes behind lots 9, 10 and 11. We feel these slopes would be difficult to maintain and may present an erosion problem. Some of the slopes are 3:1 and 4:1. Although difficult, 3:1 slopes can be maintained. The developer may wish to consider some retaining wall in the vicinity of the steeper slopes. We have indicated the preliminary design slopes on the grading plan for your information. The proposed street grade meets City standards with a 2% grade. However, it is not desirable and not Stillwater standards to run drainage across a cul -de -sac. The cul -de -sacs ST PAUL, MINNESOTA RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA PLANNING CASE REVIEW PLANNING CASE PUD 89 -82 AND SUB 89 -83 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN • • • Mr. Steve Russell January 3, 1990 Page #2 in Stillwater are designed to accommodate drainage on the curb and gutter around the peripheral radius to the catch basin. We have also indicated this in red pencil on the grading plan. The storm sewer size is not indicated and the developer should submit his drainage calculations so they may be verified by this department. We have indicated erosion control requirements on the grading plan with blue pencil. We have estimated the erosion control cost which includes seeding the entire site if the site is graded and no development takes place. Our estimate is approximately $5,590. The estimate is as follows: REM /cih Enclosure 1,230 Feet 15 Each 6.15 Acre 710 Lbs. 12.5 Tons 6.15 Acre 1,400 S.Y. Total Silt Fence Bales Seeding Seed Mulch Disc Anchoring Wood Fiber Blanket @ Richard E. Moore, P.E. City Engineer $ 1.75 = $2,153 $ 4.00 = $ 60 $50.00 = $ 308 $ .50 = $ 355 $90.00 = $1,125 $30.00 = $ 185 $ 1.00 = $1,400 $5,586 We are enclosing the print you transmitted to us with the comments indicated in red and blue pencil. If you have any questions, please contact me. INO111111111111111111; 1NIMI 111110•1111 1 as ite. 101111111111111*/ DDE Fir enTa.mg I 1 ! I .. • Till' r ,11/ 7 111111111111101& 'AV MP I 1 NUM NI 111111111 VI I ' r - _ 1 rr TL- -- . r 1 0 • • SIX MONTHS REVIEW CASE NO. SUP /89 -12 APPLICANT: JEFF LUNDEEN ADDRESS: 14470 NORTH 60TH STREET ZONING DISTRICT: IP -C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: INDUSTRIAL PARK COMMERCIAL TYPE OF APPLICATION: SPECIAL USE PERMIT DISCUSSION: A Special USe Permit was granted on February 13, 1989 to conduct a 21,500 square foot Billiard Hall in an existing building (See attached Staff report and minutes). The business opened in the summer of 1989 with ten pool tables and other video games. The following are the Conditions of Approval for the Special Use Permit. 1. A sign plan shall be submitted and approved before a sign permit is issued. 2. There shall be adequate lighting of the parking lot. • 3. No loitering outside the business in the parking lot. 4. The use shall be reviewed six months after opening. At the Planning Commission and Council hearings, the applicant said he would run a clean operation by closely managing the business. From the list of police calls, closer management of the facility may be necessary. DISCUSSION: Since the Pool Hall opened, the City has received several complaints regarding the use. (See attached police reports.) A review of the Conditions of Approval indicate that no loitering shall take place outside the business. A review of the site indicates that a temporary sign in the building was not approved as part of the application. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission review the complaints with the applicant, hear public comments on the use, and decide what measures should be taken to reduce the disturbances at this location. A review of the management policy of the use may be helpful. ATTACHMENTS: Staff report for City Council — March 7, 1989. Planning Commission minutes - February 13, 1989. Council minutes - March 7, 1989. • PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Accept report, set another review in six months. • PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW CASE NO. SUP /89 -12 Planning Commission Meeting: February 13, 1989 Project Location: 14470 North 60th Street Zoning District: Industrial Park Commercial Comprehensive Plan District: IP -C Applicant's Name: Jeff Lundeen Type of Application: Special Use Permit PROJECT DESCRIPTION Special Use Permit for a commercial recreational use, Billiard Hall, in the Industrial Park Commercial District. DISCUSSION: The application is for a 2,500 square foot billiard hall in an existing building. The plans, as submitted, include ten pool tables and other video • games. No alcoholic beverages will be served. The building is currently occupied by K -Sun manufacturing (17,825 sq. ft.) and a retail outlet (6,875 square feet). The parking requirements for the various uses are as follows: Retail - 6,875 sq. ft. = 45 spaces Manufacturing - 17,825 sq. ft. = 9 spaces Pool Hall - 2,500 sq. ft. Total = 45 spaces 99 spaces Eighty seven (87) spaces are readily available in the parking lot with additional space available, but unmarked, on site if additional parking is needed. No signage plan is submitted as of this writing but the applicant has indicated that the sign will be located on the front of the building and he will bring the sign plan at meeting time for Planning Commission review. RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Adequate access and parking is available and based on the plans submitted, the proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise • detrimental to the public welfare and in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. w-u)-- 3 1 ce., • • • CONDITION OF APPROVAL: 1. A sign plan shall be submitted and approved before a sign premit is issued. 2. There shall be adequate lighting of the parking lot. 3. No loitering outside the business in parking lot. 4. The use shall be reviewed six months after opening. ATTACHMENT: Project Plans. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval. AlkStillwater City Council Minutes II/Recessed Meeting March 7, 1989 Ayes - Councilmembers Bodlovick, Farrell, Kimble, Opheim and Mayor Abrahamson. Nays - None 7. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a. request for a Special Use Permit for a commercial recreational use (Billiard Hall) located in Industrial Pk. Comm. Dist., IP -C at 14470 No. 60th St. (Surplus Warehouse Bldg.), Jeff Lundeen, Applicant. Case No. SUP /89 -12. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on February 24, 1989 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell stated the applicant is proposing to use a portion of the Warehouse Market for a billiard hall and will include video games and vending machines. No alcoholic beverages will be served. Parking requirements were discussed and a sign plan was submitted. Mr. Fontaine • stated the Planning Commission was concerned with potential problems within and without the pool hall and suggested that adequate lighting be ` provided. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. - ' -- Motion by Councilmember Bodlovick, seconded by Councilmember Kimble to approve the request for a Special Use Permit for a Billiard Hall to be located at 14470 No.,60th St. (Surplus Warehouse Bldg.) as conditioned; Jeff Lundeen, Applicant. Case No. SUP /89 -12. (All in favor). 8. This is the day and time for the Public Hearing on a request for a Design Permit & Special Use Permit for construction of a 15,000 sq. ft. office building at 319 No. Main St., located in the Heavy, IB, Industrial Dist. (Arrow Bldg. site), Mike McGuire, Applicant. Case No. DP /SUP /89 -13. Notice of the Hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on February 24, 1989 and copies were mailed to affected property owners. Mr. Russell presented background on this request and explained the Design Permit uses Downtown Design guidelines. This request meets the floodplain conditions. Mr. Fontaine stated the Planning Commimssion felt this was a good use for the property. Mayor Abrahamson closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to approve the request for a Design Permit & Special Use Permit for construction of a 15,000 sq. ft. office building at 319 No. Main St. (Arrow Bldg. site) as conditioned; Mike McGuire, Applicant. Case No. DP /SUP /89 -13. (All in favor). • Motion by Councilmember Kimble, seconded by Councilmember Opheim to adopt the appropriate resolution approving the request for Preliminary & Final Plat to subdivide a 2.39 acre lot into two lots located at 1819 No. 4th St., as conditioned and subject to approval by the Comm. Dev. Director and City Attorney; Robert Troyer, Applicant. Case No. SUB /89 -11. (Resolution No. 8046) 5 • • Stillwater Planning Commission February 13, 1989 Motion by Mark Ehlenz to approve the subdivision request with two conditions. Seconded by Don Valsvik. Motion carried 7 -0. Case No. SUP /89 -12 - Special Use Permit for a commercial recreational use (Billiard Hall) located in the Industrial Park Commercial District at 14470 North 60th Street (Surplus Warehouse Building). Jeff Lundeen presented the application. Mr. Lundeen submitted a sign plan as requested. He stated that no alcoholic beverages will be served. The Commission recommended the following conditions: 1) No loitering in the parking lot; 2) Adequate lighting provided for the parking lot; 3) Planning Commission reviewal after six months. Motion by Don Valsvik to approve the special use permit with the three stated conditions. Seconded by Judy Curtis. Motion carried 7 -0. • Case No. DP /SUP /89 -13,- Design Permit and Special Use Permit for construction of a 15,000 sq. ft. office building at 319 North Main Street (Arrow Building Site). Mike McGuire, architect, and Mark Desch, property owner, presented the application. The Downtown Design Review Committee has reviewed the plans. Motion by Don Valsvik to approve the special use permit with the conditions of approval. Seconded by Nancy Putz. Motion carried 7 -0. Case No. V/89 -14 - Variance request to the rear yard setback requirements (20 ft. proposed, 30 feet required) for construction of a 13,716 sq. ft. retail center located at 2000 Washington Avenue in the Industrial Park Commercial District. Mr. R. C. Ernst presented the application. The center would share the existing Merrill Lynch driveway. The Commission expressed some concern with the entrance and exit plans, and there was discussion of alternative entrances and exits. Motion by Judy Curtis to approve the variance with the five stated conditions. Seconded by Mark Ehlenz. Motion carried 7 -0. C'a °A Nn. c.EA /S9 - 3 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment adding 11 acres of land to the City Comprehensive Plan boundary and designating the land Government Center, and open space buffer, located East of Panama Avenue and South of 62nd Street. City of Stillwater, 1v0 r (,(_( _ Approved X._ Denied ___ by the Council on following conditions: • . Comments: (Use other side), s ick -joi Case Number /1 , DU. Fee $ex? Data Filed PLANNING ADMINISTRATIVE FORM Street Location or Property: _ yam' Description of Request. __:. 2",tt subject to the L ecal Description of Property: t„s_ — -- Owner: Name S -- T 1_y.� �• N Address . E.LL_cic l __L .a .. _ - -- Phone: _ q2-1 Applicant (if other than owner): Name Address Phone: _ __ -_ -__ Type of Request:' ___ Rezoning ___ Approval of Preliminary Plat _ Special Use Permit \ Approval of Final Plat ___ Variance ___ Other - -g b -g 0 \. Signature of Applicant: _L.. • Date of Public Hearing: NOTE: Sketch Of proposed. grope: .` s'r'_c:'.:.P to be crawn.oxi back 02 this form ,or at- �_ _, . tacled, showing the following: _ s,' ~ : ` -� i ; . � 3,e North direction. a is I u10 . 2 Location of proposed structure on lot. d , cv t - 3. Dimensions of front and side set - backs. c`' ea, , ' e Dimensions of proposed structure. _ 6o,W.s'� 7 . - 5. Street names. ti'`'' s8; adjacent existing buildings. • . ,,.c.,,`-' - Location ar a djacer. g � • •• 7. Other information as may be requested. - . .. _ 2 - 1':4. - � Approved K_ Denied ___ by the Commission an (date) subject to the following conditions: „Lane/blend "' • v.% • A AP. 1 /o -a 41--09 2 9 -a7 39 3 /o— w —g. 4 7 "g r 9 'a—? c� 1o� -7 -67 i ! 10 /4/ - F9 /2 10-14/—S2% 3 Jo ? 2 - 9 �.e/ze7 7zrt : ..7t„ • Wait eiS kiz t _ 40e A- AO , 6) 34 147oo . FcmiThcE R<<< or a ft c2110 rc -- g9 -7 0- iP17a 6 °5-A c U_ /2 . _4 6'9 7936 1 P/70 �f A' WC O• fikc `39 -8/� ji (170 E sgAi � . QcaCG' r) '39-(cgo 3 //70 loo - Stly STILLWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT 99- (o505 '29- 753o `9- ig7 gc - 0 / 3 - &539 8c) 25 j /L/7Q JI /. &i'h 5t. .r4' TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL t 1Iwa$er THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM OVERLOOK INN FOR A TWO MONTHS EXTENSION TO CONNECT TO CITY SEWER LINE. A request for additional time to connect to City sewer lines has been received from the owner of the Overlook Inn. The original Conditions of Approval required the Bed and Breakfast be connected by March 1, 1990. The request is to extend installation date to May 31, 1990. RECOMMENDATION: Approve request. ATTACHMENT: Letter from Kristen AlDeni, January 8, 1990. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439-6121 • • • 3/ -!; / e.- -tit 1- a ?a ,4;_tie04,1fr /IX) • • • RECOMMENDATION: i1hvater. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO STATE STANDARDS FOR LOCATION OF ON -SITE SEWER SYSTEM FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 1, BROWN'S CREEK HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION The City has a request for a variance to the State Standards for location of an on -site sewer system. Based on the request, the Building Inspector has reviewed the request, along with the original report on site suitabilty for a septic system. He feels that no variance should be granted at this time until a specific design for a system and a house on the lot is proposed. The request may be appropriate but without that information it is difficult to predetermine the request. Continue request for specific site plan and septic system details. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • • III water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: VERN RYLANDER, BUILDING INSPECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1990 SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR PROPOSED LOCATION OF ON -SITE SEWER SYSTEM FOR LOT 8 BLOCK 1, BROWN'S CREEK HEIGHTS This lot is severely limited in relatively level area for the installation of an adequate on -site sewer system, a dwelling and individual water well. The sketch submitted does not accurately represent available area with less than 12% slope for development. The proposed location of the on -site sewer system, with its encroachment into the required ten foot setback from the lot line, does not appear to present any hazard to the adjacent property and it would maximize the available developable lot area. However, there is not sufficient details on total site development to support the proposed sewer location. Because of the limitations of this lot due to the topography, all of the dwelling site's components (buildings, sewer, well, driveway), should be precisely detailed in size and location before any site approval is given. The 1979 Washington County Planning Department's report on the soil and site conditions for this subdivision indicates that the three remaining lots (6, 8 and 9), are very difficult at best to develop with on -site sewer systems and individual water wells. There may be alternative systems that could be used for the individual lots or possibly a plan to use one of the remaining lots for a combined system for the other two. I would advise a careful investigation of all the alternatives for a sewage disposal system for all of the remaining lots before permitting development of any of them. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • To: Stillwater City Council 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082 From: Tor Hansen 2352 South Shore Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Re: Lot 8, Block 1, Brown's Creek Heights Dear Sirs: I own Lot 8 in Brown's Creek Heights. Please refer to the enclosed • plat map. The lot is for sale. A recent offer to purchase was unable to be consumated because the building area - where setbacks were taken into consideration -was too small for the proposed house plus the drainfield. I am requesting a variance to allow the drainfield to go right:up to the lot line. In granting this request, I believe the lot will be- come buildab7,e, and its value will be restored. e� y Tor - sen yours, - - - *6'68* .7•5•, / /. /S - - • , 4:9 � .1 � N k1 N n, 90'192 09/ - - - 901Zt -��� �1. 0 :rte 6 - sir /rl, / /e /N , ' - 082 W ti o� Z f-+- O \ \ - 0 6 >4.- U 0 J m .0: i 6 • \'. T a 0 ° -OW '09 M /z, *.JA/ —N — M1 ON/' zz 5( } E ���r ^�-\ .O. • r � ..a . , ' P . N , i r r •ils.p z - o �. ' 41 ' 0 %I. \�' -% J i \. .� 20 w � A t S `mss? ms' r4 e Z9 9L' 1071 /7p 7 / 0 e _ N 1 . '09/ T j ,£'LL/ M., ZS, L 0• /N 9 zz M „ ZS, Lo. /N f -; f J YN /7 •8 .1 3..S *,I / /S - 9e -- 1 I 09 - C0111* M.,S�. / /. //� - Si - i 4 z - '("-- 55 �l ‘.1 tl N1.S* //. //✓ , •uanjy .>y8 • O I o /S { I 1 / / 1 1 0,9 Jo cs e slo 0 h, 7 h' a N s3 z 1 • \ ter • • THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1990 SUBJECT: COMPLETION OF INCSTAR PROJECT The contract for private development between INCSTAR and i the City of Stillwater requires that before the_final City assistance payment is made, a Certificate of Compliance be issued when minimum improvements as described in the agreement are made. ■ Based on a review of project construction, the minimum improvements are in place and the Certificate of Compliance can be issued. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize execution of Certificate of Compliance. ATTACHMENT: Letter from Tom Maun, INCSTAR, January 15, 1989. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • / 1 ScanceTechnceogyahci Research January 15, 1989 Mr. Steve Russell City of Stillwater City Hall 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Russell: Sincerely, /2/aciA*_ Tom Maun Controller TPM:df In accordance with the Tax Increment Finance Agreement between the City of Stillwater and INCSTAR Corporation, INCSTAR hereby requests reimbursement under Article III, Section 3.3 as construction of the minimum improvements are substantially complete as defined in Article IV, Section 4.4(c). Additionally, INCSTAR requests a schedule of taxes due on the redevelopment property that represents a levy upon the minimum improvements completed as of January 2, 1990, so we may estimate remaining receivable due to INCSTAR • from the City of Stillwater. It is my understanding that this portion of the agreement will be settled in June of 1990. If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 779 -1708. INCSTAR Corporation • P.O. Box 285 • 1951 Northwestern Avenue • Stillwater • Minnesota • 55082 Corporate Offices: 612 -439 -9710 • Telex: 6879023 INUC UW • FAX: 612-779-0221 • • • SCHEDULE C CERTIFICATE OF. COMPLETION WHEREAS, The City of Stillwater, Minnesota, a municipal corporation (the "City "), entered into a certain Contract for Private Redevelopment with INCSTAR Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Redeveloper "), dated as of December 15, 1988 (the "Agreement ") and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in and for the County of Washington and State of Minnesota, as Document Number which provided for the development of the following described land in County of Washington and State of Minnesota, to wit (such tract or parcel of land hereinafter referred to as the "Property "): and Lot 1, Block 1, Immuno Nuclear Industrial Park, according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. Lot 1, Block 1, St. Croix Business Park according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota, excepting therefrom that part of Lot 1, Block 1, St. Croix Business Park platted as Immuno Nuclear Industrial Park. WHEREAS, said Agreement contained certain covenants, conditions and obligations, the breach of which by Redeveloper, its successors and assigns, would result in an event of default and the right to exercise remedies on default by the City, its successors and assigns, said covenants, conditions and obligations being set forth in Section 9.1 of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, said Redeveloper has performed said covenants, conditions and obligations insofar as it is able in a manner deemed sufficient by the City to permit the execution and recording of this certificate; WHEREAS, said Redeveloper covenants a continuing obligation in relationship to the Property to: 1. Continue insurance coverage pursuant to Section 5.1 of '/ the Agreement; 2. Pay real estate taxes as they come due and provide any funds required pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Agreement; and C -1 • The above described -covenants (the "Continuing Covenants "), as between the City and the Redeveloper, shall be binding upon the Redeveloper, its successors and assigns until the Maturity Date on the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, this is to certify that all building construction and other physical improvements specified to be done and made by the Redeveloper have been completed and that, with the exception of the Continuing Covenants, the land described herein and the Redeveloper, its successors and assigns are forever released from all requirements of the Agreement. Dated: , 19 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF 3. Notify the City of any assignment or transfer of the Redevelopment Property pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Agreement. ss. THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA By Its By Its On this day of , 19 , before me ,.a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the and of the City named in the foregoing instrument; that the seal affixed to said instrument is the seal of said City; that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said City by authority of its Council; and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City. Notary Public C -2 This instrument was drafted by: • MACKALL, CROUNSE & MOORE 1600 TCF Tower 121 South 8th Street - Minneapolis, MN 55402 • • • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO NOISE, PROVIDING FOR THE ELIMINATION AND PREVENTION OF PROHIBITED NOISE, AND IMPOSING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, does ordain: I. The Stillwater City Code is hereby amended by adding the following Section 38.04 NOISE CONTROL AND REGULATION "Subdivision 1. DEFINITIONS. 1. General. Words and phrases defined in this subdivision have, when used in this ordinance, the meanings given below. Any other word or phrase used in this ordinance, and defined in regulations of the Minnesota Polution Control Agency Noise Polution Control Section, NPC -1 and NPC -4, has the meaning given in those regulations. 2. Noise. "Noise" means an unwanted sound. Sound to be measured by a sound level meter (SLM) having characteristics as specified in the latest standards, 51.4 of the American Standards Institute Calibration of SLM to be at least "second stage" traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. 3. L10. L10 means the sound level, expressed in decibels (dBA) which is exceeded ten percent of the time for a one -hour period. 4. L50. L50 means the sound level similarly expressed and measured which is exceeded fifty percent of the time for a one - hour period. Subdivision 2. NOISES PROHIBITED. 1. Radios, Phonographs, Paging Systems, Musical Instruments and other Devices. No person shall use or operate or permit the use or operation of any radio receiving set, musical instrument, phonograph, paging system, machine or other device for the production or reproduction of sound in a distinctly and loudly audible manner as to disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of any person nearby. This includes operation of any such set, instrument, phonograph, machine, or other device between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. in such a manner as to be plainly audible at the property line of the structure or building in which it is located, in the hallway or apartment adjacent, or at a distance of 50 feet if the source is located outside a structure or building. Subdivision 3. HOURLY RESTRICTION ON CERTAIN OPERATIONS. 1. Recreational Vehicles. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., drive or operate any minibike, snowmobile, or other recreational vehicle not licensed for travel on public highways, in such a manner that it is plainly audible at a distance of 50 feet from its source. 2. Domestic Power Equipment. No person shall operate a power lawn mower, power hedge clipper, chain saw, mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill, or other similar domestic power maintenance equipment except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on any weekend or holiday. Snow removal equipment is exempt from this provision. 3. Construction Activities. No person shall engage in or permit construction activities involving the use of any kind of electric, diesel, or gas - powered machine or other power equipment except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. on any weekday or between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. on any weekend or holiday. Subdivision 4. RECE LAND USE STANDARDS. 1. Maximum Noise Levels by Receiving Land Use Districts. No person shall operate or cause or permit to be operated any source of noise in such a manner as to create a noise level exceeding the limit set in Table I for the receiving land use category specified when measured at or within the property line of the receiving land use. Table I. Soun Levels by Receiving Land Use Districts Day Night (8:)0 a.m. (10:00 p.m. -10:00 p.m.) -8:00 a.m.) Land Use Districts L10 Standard L50 Standard L10 Standard L50 Standard Residential 65 dBA Commercial 70 dBA Industrial 80 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 75 dBA For noise relative to period less than L -10, the following conditions apply: No indoor sound level shall be raised more than 6 dbc over existing background; no outdoor sound level shall be raised more than 10 dbc over existing background noise level. The limits of the most restrictive district shall apply at the boundaries between different land use categories. The determination of land use shall be by its zoned designation. 2 55 dBA 70 dBA 80 dBA 50 dBA 65 dBA 75 dBA • • • III Subdivision 5. NEW MULTIPLE DWELLING CONSTRUCTION. New multiple dwelling construction shall have a sound transmission class (STC) designed to 50; field measurable to 45; and impact isolation class designed to 50; field measurable to 45, in addition to meeting requirements of the Minnesota Uniform Building Code. • • Subdivision 6. ENFORCEMENT. 1. Notice of Certain Violations. When the Public Safety Director or his designee determines that a noise exceeds the maximum sound level permitted under Subdivision 4, he or she shall give written notice of the violation to the owner or occupant of the premises where the noise originates and order such person to correct or remove each specified violation within such reasonable time as is prescribed in the notice. The failure to remove or correct any such violation within the time so prescribed constitutes a violation of this ordinance. 2. Civil Remedies. This ordinance may be enforced by injunction, action for abatement, or other appropriate civil remedy. 3. Criminal Penalties. Every person who violates any other provision of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $700 or imprisonment for a term of not to exceed 90 days, or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Each act of violation and each day a violation occurs or continues constitutes a separate offense." In all other ways, the City Code shall remain in full force and effect. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council this day of , 19 Attest: Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk Published: Wally Abrahamson, Mayor • • ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS SHORT ELLIUI I HENDRICKSON INC. December 21, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Council Members: BCP /bcp Enclosure 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490 -2000 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA RE: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR ELAINE KROGSTAD L.I. 262 SEH FILE 90147 This study addressess the feasibility of providing sanitary sewer and watermain service to a three lot minor subdivision (the Krogstad property) located south of Walnut Court Drive. The at- tached Drawing No. 1 shows the project location. Utility service is available at the north property line from stubs constructed as a part of the Sunset Ridge Estates improve- ments. It is proposed to extend an 8" PVC gravity sanitary sewer and a 12" D.I.P. watermain south from these stubs to the south property line of the Krogstad subdivision. Each of the parcels would be served with individual sewer and water stubs from the proposed mains. The estimated poject costs for these improve- ments, including 35% for contingencies, administrative, engineer- ing, and legal costs is $30,120. Current city policy is to assess all of the project costs to benefited properties. The only properties within the city which receive benefit, is the 3 parcels in the proposed minor subdivi- sion. Therefore, the estimated "per lot" assessment based on the $30,120 project cost is $10,040. We find that the improvements are feasible from the engineering standpoint. The economical feasiblity will need to be determined by the developer. These improvements, when constructed, should be as outlined in this report. We will be available to discuss this with the Council at your convenience. Sincerely, Barry C. Peters, P.E. CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN • • I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under -1) the laws of th State of Minnesota. t A- C' DATE: 1/1Z(50 REG. NO. 14148 REVIEWED BY: t.1 /�7��'Yi'ZZ_ DATE: /A-ZAq 0 • • • ENGINEERS ESTIMATE KROGSTAD MINOR SUBDIVISION STILLWATER, MINNESOTA L.I. 262 SEH FILE 90147 UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANT. PRICE TOTAL SANITARY SEWER 1 8" PVC L.F. 360 14.00 5,040.00 2 MANHOLES EACH 2 1,000.00 2,000.00 3 EXTRA DEPTH MH L.F. 7.8 100.00 780.00 4 4 "x8" WYES EACH 3 40.00 120.00 5 4" PVC SERVICE L.F. 30 8.00 240.00 6 CONNECT TO EX. EACH 1 200.00 200.00 7 TRENCH STAB. TON 90 10.00 900.00 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER $9,280.00 WATERMAIN 8 12" DIP L.F. 360 22.00 7,920.00 9 6" DIP L.F. 20 20.00 400.00 10 HYDRANTS & GV EACH 1 1,600.00 1,600.00 11 CONNECT TO EX. EACH 1 250.00 250.00 12 CORP. EACH 3 100.00 300.00 13 CURB STOP & BOX EACH 3 100.00 300.00 14 COPPER L.F. 60 8.00 480.00 15 FITTINGS LBS. 190 2.00 380.00 TOTAL WATER MAIN $11,630.00 RESTORATION & CLEARING 16 SEEDING ACRE 0.25 2,000.00 500.00 17 CLEAR & GRUB EACH 6 150.00 900.00 TOTAL RESTORATION $1,400.00 TOTAL EST. CONSTRUCTION $22,310.00 35% CONTING., ADMIN. ENG. AND LEGAL 7,810.00 ESTIMATED PROJECT $30,120.00 LOCATION MAP MINOR SUBDIVISION STILLWATER, MINNESOTA FILE NO. DRG. NO. 1 • • ENGINEERS 1 ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS c 5" PINES WALNUT CREEK DR. 12_' R.P. 5" PINES _ DPEAVE� DA_ 5" PINES 8" P.V.C 8" D.I.P. PARCEL 'A' (NO SCALE) .., PARCEL 'B' PARCEL 'C' i SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION MINOR SDIVISION FILE NO. DRG. NO. 2 • . ��rr►■ r ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS ■PLANNERS TO: RE: We are X Enclosing ❑ Sending Under Separate Cover ❑ As Requested REMARKS SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Nile Kriesel City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth St. Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater - Krogstad Property 19 nnpies of Feasibility Report A report was not sent to the Krogstads. 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55110 612 490-2000 FOR YOUR ❑ Information ❑ Review ❑ Records IX Distribution ❑ Approval ❑ Revision and Resubmittal BY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Barry Peters TRANSMITTAL 90147 FILE NO. January 12, 1990 DATE CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN • • DISCUSSION: THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANN PUNG - TERWEDO, Assistant Planner DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1990 SUBJECT: FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 31.01, SUBDIVISION 27 (10), DESIGN REVIEW PERMITS, AND AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 22.10, HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION. DESIGN REVIEW: The Heritage Preservation Commission was established in 1987. Its purpose is to safeguard the heritage of the City of Stillwater by preserving sites and structures which reflect elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, visual or architectural history. In October of 1989, after recommendation by the Heritage Preservation Commission, the City Council • declared Downtown Stillwater a Local Preservation District. By Ordinance, the Preservation Commission has authority to review all exterior building permits and new construction as they relate to history, design and visual compatibility to existing structures in the Downtown. The Design Review Committee, established in 1989, has a similar purpose in reviewing building permits and new construction in Downtown Stillwater. Today, if a property owner applied for a Design Permit in the Downtown, they must have Design Review Committee, Heritage Preservation Commission and Planning Commission review with final City Council approval. This is a very long process that could take up to six weeks. The Heritage Preservation Commission has expertise in design and, of course, sensitivity to preservation in Downtown. Also, two members from the Commission are on the five member Design Review Committee. A Planning Commission member on the Design Review Committee recently resigned his position. SIGNS: Signs are important to the character and quality of Downtown Stillwater. The new Sign Ordinance and Downtown design guidelines for signs have proved quite effective in regulating signs in Downtown Stillwater. The sign regulation is very specific on sign size, number, and illumination. However, the review process for signs is long. If an application for a sign is submitted, it must be reviewed by the Design Review Committee, Preservation Commission, and Planning Commission with final approval by the City Council, again taking up to six weeks. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Amend the Design Review Ordinance to establish the Heritage Preservation Commission as the Design Review Committee. 2. Amend the Design Review Ordinance and Preservation Commission Ordinance in order to allow the Planning Staff to review and grant sign permits in Downtown Stillwater as long as they are consistent with the Sign Ordinance and the Downtown Design Guidelines. If a variance is needed it will go through the variance review process. The Design Review Committee will have a final decision on the sign permit in such instances. . ORDINANCE • • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 31.01 SUBDIVISION 27 (1) DESIGN REVIEW PERMITS 1 (B) Establishment of Committee Design Review Committee is established. The Committee shall consist of the Heritage Preservation Commission. (C) Required When: (s) Any project in the Downtown Stillwater Historic Commercial District as regulated by the Stillwater City Code Section 22.10. (I) Findings and Decision: (3) Secure the purpose of the Stillwater City Code Section 22.10. (F) (1) DEVELOPMENT: The Design Review Committee shall review all applications for development as required by this Ordinance. The Community Development Director shall arrange with the applicant a time and place of meeting between the applicant and committee. The Committee shall make reports and recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council. (2) Sign Permits: The Design Review Committee shall review sign permits with recommendation from the Community Development Director. The Design Review Committee shall make a final decision on granting a sign permit. The sign permit applicant or any party aggrieved by the decision of the Committee has the right to appeal such decision to the City Council. • • • Subd. 6 Review of Permits ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 22.10 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUBDIVISION 6, SITE ALTERATION PERMITS (C) Signs are regulated by City Code Section 31.01, Subdivision 27 (10) Design Review Permits. • • • Provider: DESIGNATION OF DELEGATE TO EMS COUNCIL 1990 Delegate to EMS Council Name: Mailing Address: WASHINGTON COUTNY EMS COUNCIL Home Phone: Work Phone: (Please complete the mailing address as you wish to receive all Council correspondence, minutes, agendas, meeting announcements, etc.) First Alternate: Second Alternate: t n �n STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONENO.( 612 )- 345 -3331 • • February 2, 1990 Mr. Nile Kriesel City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota Mississippi River System Management Team Route 2 Box 230 Lake City, Minnesota 55041 FILE NO. RE: St. Croix River Boat Access Development at the NSP Allen S. King Power Plant Dear Mr. Kriesel: As we discussed on the phone today, attached is the Landowner's Bill of Rights which needs to be signed by the Mayor. Since we already have a Memorandum of Understanding signed regarding the purchase of City property, this is more of a formality but a necessary part of our acquisition process within the DNR. However, it does clearly define the acquisition process and what to expect at various steps in the process. Secondly, since the City has already completed an appraisal, you may wish to have it considered along with the State's appraisal. If so, please provide a copy for our use. I will stop by City Hall on Thursday, February 6 to pick -up the signed cover page of the Landowner's Bill of Rights and a copy of your appraisal if one is available at that time. I will be the field representative /coordinator for this project. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at the number above. I am looking forward to working with the City in the estabishment of a much needed access to the St. Croix. Alan Robbins - Fender Recreation Specialist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER It i ��nn STATE OF EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR INFORMATION 500 LAFAYETTE GOAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 -4030 (612) 296 -6157 Dear Minnesota law requires tle DNR to explain to individuals who are considering selling their property t) the State their rights and obligations. For your convenience, a :opy of the "Landowner's Bill of Rights" which summa- rizes your statutory rights is enclosed (See also MN Stat %84.0274). Of particular interest t) you, may be the paragraph describing your right to hire an independent real estate appraiser. At this time we ask that you sign and return this cover letter as an acknowl- edgement that you have "Received" the Bill of Rights letter. (Your signature does not obligate you in any way.) Thank you for considering the DNR as a potential buyer for your property. Sincerely, Jeff Hanson, Manager Acquisition and Exchange Section Bureau of Real Estate Management (612) 296 -0625 I have received a copy of the "Landowner's Bill of Rights" letter and it has been explained to me. yes RECEIPT Landowner's Signature ; I am representing other owners of this property. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER DATE Owner's Name:a- G 1L 4 r Project vc { across• ( 7rr,lx?Zi` ' Parcel: County: sin;na-f'rivl v MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LANDOWNER'S BILL OF RIGHTS • • State parks, water access sites, wildlife management areas, state forests, fisheries projects, recreational trails, canoe and boating routes, wild and scenic rivers, scientific and natural areas and the state water bank program all provide recreational opportunities for the general public or protection of the State's natural resources. Each of these programs authorizes either the purchase of the fee title to land or the purchase of a lesser interest in land, such as an easement. Selling land to the Department of Natural Resources is in many ways similar to selling it to a private party, but in other ways is different from standard real estate transactions. Because of the many Federal and State laws that govern land acquisition, it often takes eight months to a year and a half to sell land to the Department of Natural Resources. These laws were designed both to protect private landowners' rights and to assure that public money is well spent to serve the public interest. This letter describes the Department of Natural Resources' land acquisition procedure. Please keep it for future reference. Land Identification The management programs select the tracts of land which they feel would most help them to carry out their programs. Once your land has been identified for purchase, you will be contacted by a Department of Natural Resources representative who will explain what your land would be used for if it is purchased and will also explain the land acquisition process to you. You are free to decide whether or not to sell your land to the State. I f you are willing to consider selling it, the State will have your land appraised and you will then decide if you want to sell it at the appraised value. If you do not want to sell your land to the State, you are under no obligation to do so. However, you may be contacted again in the future to see if you might have changed your mind. Appraisal Process The State will hire a qualified appraiser to determine the fair market value of your property. You will be invited to accompany the appraiser during his or her inspection of the property, if you so desire. You also have the right to hire an appraiser to provide an independent opinion of value for your property. You will be notified of the deadline for your appraisal to be submitted if you would like it to be reviewed along with the State's appraisal. After the appraisals are reviewed, a fair market value will be established as just compensation for your pro- perty. If your land is purchased by the State, you may be reimbursed up to $500 for the cost of your appraisal providing you submit a copy of that report and a paid receipt for it. It is not necessary for you to submit your appraisal for review in order to be reimbursed for it. Negotiation Process The State is not allowed to discuss the price until after the appraisal is completed and will not discuss the price with anyone but the landowner or his agent. Documents regarding the purchase of your property will be public records once the purchase is completed. At the beginning of the negotiation period, you will be given a summary of the approved appraisal. This summary will include the final conclusion of value, the total number of acres and types of land appraised, the valuation of all buildings and improvements being purchased, and any special elements of value. The same person who appraised your property for the State will not act as a negotia- tor for its purchase. Purchase Procedure The Department of Natural Resources will acquire your property by means of an option, which is an offer from the landowner to sell. The option, including all special provisions, legal descriptions and elements of execution, must be reviewed by the State as to its legality and accepta- bility. The State sha'1 have 20 days after receiving an option to notify the landowner in writing if the option is not approved and the reasons therefore. If you are not notified of an option's disapproval, you should assume it is approved. Unless you request otherwise in writing, the option period shall be no more than two months if no survey is required. If a survey is required, the option period shall be no more than nine months. These time limits do not apply to wildlife management areas that require county board approval. The option period begins on the last date on which the option is signed by a landowner. Before the end of the option period, the State shall decide whether or not to purchase the land and shall notify the landowner of its decision by either a Nctice of Election to Purchase or a letter explaining the reasons for not purchasing the property. If the State does not elect to purchase property of which it has approved and accepted an option, it will pay the landowner $500 after the option period expires. After signing the option, you have one month to mail or deliver an Abstract of Title to the Department of Natural Resources. If your land title is registered, you should submit your Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title plus a Registered Property Abstract instead of an Abstract of Title. The State will have the abstract brought up to date at its own expense. Within one month from the Notice of Election to Purchase or delivery of the abstract, whichever is later, the Attorney General will provide a title opinion which will identify any defects in your title to be cleared up before the purchase can be completed. You will then have 120 days to make your title marketable. The landowner is required to pay all taxes that are due in the year in which the deed or easement is signed, including Green Acres deferred taxes. Once the taxes are paid and all title defects are cured, the Attorney General will send you a Warranty Deed or other conveyance document to sign and return. The State pays the abstracting and recording fees related to the sale. If your property is held as security for a loan or advance of credit that requires or permits the imposition of a pre - payment penalty; this penalty shall also be reimbursed by the State. The costs of clearing title de- fects, payment of taxes and related attorney's fees are not reimbursable. • • • Method of Payment Payment for the land is mailed to the landowner after the signed deed or other conveyance document has been recorded and the abstract brought up to date. Depending on the County Recorder's workload, this may take anywhere from two to four weeks. Assuming your title is marketable and you act expeditiously to complete the transaction, payment must be made no later than 90 days after the Notice of Election to Purchase. You may choose to be paid in either a lump sum or in up to four separate payments. The State does not pay interest on monies held during an in- stallment agreement. Vacating Your Property You have the right to continue occupancy of your property until 90 days after the date of the deed. You may stay an additional 90 days by paying a fair market rent to the State, with the prior written approval of the management program for which your property is being purchased. If you do not vacate your property within 180 days of the date of the deed, you will automatically waive your right to any relocation benefits to which you may otherwise be entitled. Relocation Benefits The State is obligated to pay relocation expenses any time they displace owners or tenants from their residences, displace a business or cause a business to cease operating. Moving expenses are the most common reloca- tion benefit. A relocation advisor is assigned to work with anyone who might be displaced by State land acquisition to guide them in relocating to a new home or business. Legal Rights You have the right to accept or reject the State's offer for your property. If you accept the offer, you may receive or waive any relocation assis- tance, services, payments and benefits. You also have the right to accept the State's offer for the property and to contest the relocation benefits. You have the right to seek the advice of an attorney regarding any aspect of your land sale. You also have the right to have the State acquire your land by condemnation at your written request and with the agreement of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. The primary laws governing Department of Natural Resources land acquisition procedures are, Public Law 91 -646 and Minnesota Statutes Section 84.0274. For further information, contact: Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Land Acquisition and Exchange Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 30 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4030 (612) 296 -4097 • • • t LIST OF BILLS EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 8238 American Heart Association Supplies CPR Classes Anderson, James Ice Arena Duty Assn. Metropolitan Municipalities1990 Dues Blevin Concession Company Buberi, Larry Business Equipment Brokerage Business Equipment Brokerage Capitol City Regional Fire Fighters Assn. Capitol City Mutual Aid Assn. Case Power and Equipment Century Power Equipment Commissioner of Transportation Community Volunteer Service Cool Air Mechanical Coordinated Business Systems Croixland Excavating Debion, Diane Ecolab Pest Elimination Glaser, Paul Goodin Company Gopher Sign Company Gordon Iron Company Grindstone, Inc. Heath, David Herman Junker Candy Company International Institute of Municipal Clerks Jim's Building Mte. Jim's Building Mte. Jim Hatch Sales Johnson, Ron Junker Recycling Service, Inc. Kolliner's Kolliner's Lawson, Raleigh, Marshall Lettertech Lily Lake Imprest Fund Ludowese, Jay Magnuson, David Menards Safety Carpet Metro Chief Fire Officers Assn. 1990 Dues - Seim Miller, Davin Ice Arena Duty Mn. Chiefs Police Assn. Name Tag Minnesota Blue Print Paper Minnesota Cellular One Mobile Phone Supplies Meal Repairs /Cassettes Cork Board /Calculator 1990 Dues 1990 Dues 1989 Loader Parts for Blower Re -Lamp 1990 Allocation Motor Replaced Static Spray Excavating Runk House Health Insurance /Mileage Pest Control Boots /Belt Meter Post Caps Freight Charges Oxygen /Iron Ice Knives Sharpened January Services Concession Supplies Membership Multi -fold towels Monthly Charge 12 Pair Gloves Belt December Recycling Clothing - Miller Clothing - Swanson Legal Services Letters for Helmet Reimbursement Meal Legal Services $ 284.25 31.40 2,735.00 105.91 4.91 117.00 97.95 25.00 50.00 72,260.00 84.70 7.61 2,625.00 1,042.89 19.00 100.00 212.39 185.00 101.95 287.11 28.68 119.95 45.00 175.00 587.00 75.00 19.99 676.60 80.09 12.00 3,532.50 188.72 131.25 300.00 7.50 148.80 4.91 7,238.95 344.43 60.00 31.40 8.75 19.74 19.20 Minnesota Chapter I.A,A.I. Minnesota Conway Fire & Safety Minnesota Conway Fire & Safety Mn. Dept. Public Safety 3M Company MRPA Moore Business Forms Motorola, Inc. Motorola, Inc. Murray Sandler Northern States Power Company North Star International Northwestern Tire & Battery Oak Park Heights Industries One Hour Express Photo Postmaster Redland Insurance Company Re ichow , David River City Beverage Short Elliott Hendrickson Simonet Furniture Company Snyder Bros. Stafford, R. H. Washington County Treasurer Stafford, R. H. Washington County Treasurer Stevensen, James R. Stevensen, Mary Jo Stillwater Area Chambar Stillwater, City Of Stillwater Ford Swanson, Douglas Taystee Baking Twin Cities Suburban Conf. 'Twin City Testing Uniforms Unlimited United Laboratories Universal Medical Service Van Paper Company Viers, Larry Viking Office Products Wear Guard Wood, Montoe Wybrite, Inc. MANUAL CHECKS American National Banat Assn. Government Accountants Bell, Timothy Conference - Barthol Re- charge Re- charge Connect Charge /Terminals Paper /Letters Membership - Bielenberg Receipts Antenna System Service Agreement Tape /Mouth Guards Energy Charge Dump Truck Front End Alignment Manual Binders Photos Bulk Mailing Fee Flood Insurance Belt Concession Supplies Engineering Repair VCR Batteries /Film Calcium Chloride Coffee Filters Sew Patches (22) Meal - Kriesel Reimburse Petty Cash Heater Assy, Clothing Allowance Concession Supplies Anoka /Coon Rapids Soil Tests Uniforms Wasp Spray LSP Regulator Towels /Tissue Mileage Office Supplies Jacket -Fire Reimburse- Equipment Printer Head /Cable Interest Registration - Deblon School Expense /Uniforms 1 95.00 19.50 13.00 330.00 592.50 95.00 357.77 39.54 267.00 471.45 23,341.56 44,489.53 40.28 292.50 16.07 60.00 616.00 12.00 341.00 243 .60 67.50 39.48 Sex Harassment Training 100.00 51.48 7.50 22.00 15.00 98.07 21.01 70.00 222.04 797.25 200.00 3,663.85 470.88 148.00 197.85 35.00 173'42 10.00 66.14 50.50 25,300.96 49.00 492.50 • • • Blue Cross /Blue Shield Commissioner of Revenue Esteban's Internal Revenue Service Jim's Building Maintenance Junker Sanitation Service Magnuson, David Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mn. State Board Accountancy North American Life Red .Wing, City of Stafford, R. H. Washington County Treasurer State Treasurer, Minnesota University Book Store ADDENDUM TO BILLS American Linen Supply Beberg, Byrdie Carson Map Company Croixside Press Custom Fire Apparatus Glaser, Paul Lind, Leslie and Gladys Mautz Paint Company Minnesota U. C. Fund North Memorial Medical Center Terwedo, Ann Volk Sewer & Water Washington County Public Health Wear Guard APPROVED FOR PAYMENT January Billing Sales Tax -4th Quarter NSF Check FICA - Russell December Payment January Payment Legal Services Sewer Service Charge 2,548.13 1,350.16 48.97 24.32 1,070.00 58,200.00 1,893.50 61,403.63 SAC Charges - December 5,405.40 License and Dues 20.00 Insurance -Mary Lou Johnson 120.00 IBM System 36 3,900.00 License and Tabs Surcharge-4th Quarter Lily Lake Depth Map Linen Service Services Revision Pages Payroll Records 3 Junction Boxes Boiler Engineer Parking Lot Purchase Paint - Garage 432.00 1,301.10 4.68 13.00 383.75 134.95 73.40 153.35 200.00 927.00 641.36 Unemployment- Schmidt Scott 775.28 BCLS Course -Viers 75.00 Mileage 20.00 #255 and Final 8,991.36 Hazardous Waste License 142.80 Uniforms -Fire 137.43 Adopted by the Council this 6th day of February, 1990. CONTRACTORS APPLICATIONS • February 6, 1990 • • Giebler Woodworking 706 West Hickory Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Noah Bridges Carpentry 6712 Emerson Ave. No. Brooklyn Center, Mn. 55430 Suburban Lighting, Inc. 6077 Lake Elmo Ave. No. Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Woodsmith Builders 419 West Maple Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Yaeger Company, Inc. 10520 Stone Bridge Trail Stillwater, Mn. 55082 General Contractor General Contractor Sign Erection General Contractor General Contractor Renewal New Renewal New New Nile Kriesel City Coordinator 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 • • Dear Sir: January 26, 1990 This letter is to serve as notice to the City of Stillwater that I am making a formal complaint against the City of Stillwater and in particular its employee David Stellrecht. The complaint I am making alleges that Mr. Stellrecht negligently and purposely injured my son, Jeremy Burr, on or about the 20th of January, 1990. The fact of the incident are as follows: My son, who thirteen years old, was skating and playing on the skating rink at Northland Park at which Mr. Stellrecht was in charge. My son was injured at approximately 7:30 - 8:00 on that evening. The injury to him was a broken radius bone in his right arm. I was informed by the Doctors at the clinic that his injury was one that required considerable force to consummate. My son Jeremy informs me that he was viscously knocked to the ice by your employee, David Stellrecht who is a full size adult. My son is, by way of note, a small and slightly built thirteen year old of approximately 110 pounds. I was also informed that Mr. Stellrecht did not offer any assistance to my son beyond a cursory "are you alright ". My son arrived home that evening in tears with his arm swollen after walking a half a mile from the rink. We were required to take him to the hospital where his arm was x -rayed and set and he was given medications for the pain. I find that this behavior on the part of a city employee to be reprehensible and inexcusable. The facts seem to me that the purpose of having supervision at these parks is to prevent this sort of incident not to be a cause of this sort of an incident. I would find it difficult to believe that there would be any stretch of the imagination that could justify the knocking to the ice of a thirteen year old by a full grown adult with such force that he broke his arm. I have at this time not decided what method I intend to use to pursue this matter further. I assume that you will be conducting a thorough investigation and informing me of the outcome of that investigation. I also assume you will be suggesting what sort of compensation by the city would be appropriate to cover costs in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you in this matter. Sincerely yours, Thomas R. Burr, 2581 Bayberry Avenue Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Phone No. 439 -9005 • • • Mr. Robert McGarry McGarry /Kearney Ins. Agency 243 South Main Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Please process. mi j Enc. cc: David Magnuson, City Attorney J. R. Blekum, Parks Director iliwatet ____----- THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA February 1, 1990 Dear Mr. McGarry: Enclosed is a claim from Thomas R. Burr, 2581 Bayberry Ave., on behalf of his son, Jeremy, who sustained an injury (broken arm) at Northland Park hockey rink on January 20, 1990. Sincerely, P&_. d-- C c: - . 7 7 , --A--c Mary Lou t'ohnson City Clerk CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • • • , j1lwater. February 1, 1990 Mr. Thomas R. Burr 2581 Bayberry Avenue Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Dear Mr. Burr: NLK /smc THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA I have received your letter regarding your son's injury that took place on or about the 20th of January 1990. I have talked to Mr. Stellrecht and to Dick Blekum, Parks Director, about this matter and do not believe that the injury was the result of negligence or malicious intent. However, these matters are usually handled /investigated by our insurance carrier so I am forwarding your letter to them. I am sure they will be getting in touch with you in the next few days. I regret that your son sustained an injury at the City rink (regardless of how it happened), and I will use the insurance company's investigative report and recommendation as well as my own observations to help reduce the potential for injury at the rink. Please feel free to call me at 439 -6121 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Nile L. Kriesel City Coordinator CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612- 439 -6121 January 25, 1989 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 222 -8423 To Municipal Government Staff Representatives: The Metropolitan Waste Control (MWCC) is seeking applicants for the General Advisory Committee to the Commission which was authorized by the MWCC in December 1989. We are seeking eight members who are municipal government staff represent- atives, one member from each MWCC precinct. We are contacting your city /township to inform you of the formation of this advisory committee. An application form is enclosed if someone from your municipal staff wishes to apply. An informational sheet explaining the duties of the advisory committee, and a map indicating MWCC Precincts are enclosed. Applications are to be submitted by March 15, 1990 to: Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Attn: Lurline Baker -Kent, Chair 230 East 5th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 If you need more information regarding this advisory committee, call Pauline Langsdorf (229- 2102). Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer WHAT IS THE GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE? This is a new committee designed to serve a function somewhat similar to the former Sewer Service Advisory Boards that existed metro -wide before legislation in 1987 did away with the six service areas to establish one sewer service area. The job of this advisory committee is to focus on the sewer service needs of the communities of the Twin Cities seven county metropolitan area and to advise the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) on issues related to these needs. This new advisory committee will be formed in the spring of 1990 and will consist of 25 members and a Chair appointed by the Chair of the MWCC. Citizens serving on this committee should have a strong interest in the effective and efficient collection and treatment of the metropolitan area's wastewater. ITS PURPOSE Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHAT IT IS; HOW TO APPLY 612 222 -8423 The purpose of this advisory committee is to develop recommendations to the MWCC related to metropolitan area wastewater service and treatment with a focus on planning and managing for the future. The MWCC Commission will refer topics to be studied by the advisory group. These might include MWCC's budget, toxics control, odors, residual solids management, water quality issues, communication and public education efforts. HOW THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION FITS IN The MWCC is charged with collecting and treating the wastewater of the Twin Cities area, to preserve and protect the environment. The MWCC serves 105 communities in the seven counties and treats more than 275 million gallons of sewage per day. The MWCC owns and operates 11 wastewater treatment plants and provides a series of interceptor sewer pipes to Zink the communities to the MWCC wastewater treatment plants. The agency is governed by a board of Commissioners that sets the agency's policy and represents geographic precincts throughout the seven - county metro area. The MWCC obtains a majority of its funding through user service charges. The Metropolitan Council, the chief planning and coordinating agency for the Metropolitan Area, determines which portions of the seven county metropolitan area are to have sewer service. The MWCC provides the sewer service to the areas designated by the Metropolitan Council. HOW MEMBERS TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ARE SELECTED Advisory committee members are appointed by the MWCC Chair. The MWCC will ask for recommendations for committee members from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM), the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA), individual cities and townships, local Chambers of Commerce, and various environmental organizations. The MWCC Chair will serve as General Advisory Committee Chair or will appoint a MWCC Commissioner to Chair the committee. The Committee will consist of one elected official and one appointed official from each MWCC precinct. There will be four members representing environmental groups, and four members representing industry. One at -large senior citizen member will represent economically disadvantaged senior citizens. Members serve staggered thr=ee -year terms. (Initially members will be appointed to one, two, or three year terms to establish the rotation process.) Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer 0 WHAT DO BOARD MEMBERS DO? Members attend meetings every month, the date of which is to be determined once the members have been appointed. Members are expected to read materials distributed prior to meetings. Members may also serve on a task force to study a public policy issue. In addition, members will listen to and consider comments from area citizens and interest grcups on issues before the MWCC Board of Commissioners. COMPENSATION? General Advisory Committee members serve without compensation but are reimbursed for reasonable expenses as determined by section 15.059 of state law. INTERESTED? If you wish to be considered for appointment to this new advisory committee, please contact Pauline Langsdorf, Acting Director of Putlic and Community Relations, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, or call 229 -2921 for an application form. Applications must be received in our offices at Mears Park Centre by March 15, 1990, in order to be considered. • • • NAME: ADDRESS: APPLICATION FOR METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION GENERAL ADVISORY COMbu �r, APPOINTMENT Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, MN 55101 612 222 -8423 last street number MAILING ADDRESS (if different from home address): municipality or township zip code street number city state zip code PHONE: Home Business METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTOL COMMISSION PRECINCT (see enclosed map) CATEGORY OF MEMBERSHIP: NAME OF GROUP REPRESENTED: Elected Municipal Official Municipal Staff Environmental Group Representative Industry Representative At -Large Senior Citizen Date first middle EMPLOYMENT: Please be specific in providing beginning and ending dates for employment and membership in civic and similar organization. Employing firm, agency , Address Position Beginning date Years with agency Other work experience (optional): Employing firm, agency , Beginning, ending dates Employing firm, agency Beginning, ending dates Employing firm, agency , Beginning, ending dates CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES: Organization , Beginning, ending dates Position • Organization , Beginning, ending dates Position Organization , Beginning, ending dates Position OTHER INFORMATION (Please give beginning, ending dates, if applicable.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The following information is optional and is sought solely for the purpose of broadening citizen participation in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's decision - making process. Sex Race/National Origin _ Female _ American Indian/Alaska Native Male _ Asian or Pacific Islander Black _ Hispanic Caucasian Other (specify) Check if the following applies to you: 60 year of age or older REFERENCES (optional): A. B. Return to: full name mailing address full name mailing address If you have any questions, call the Commission at 229 -2102. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 5f101 Attention: Pauline Langsdoa f relationship phone number relationship phone number 6 • • HOLLYWOOD • C•HO(N Metropolitan Waste Control Commission H AS S• N lNANO•tt OSSIO CCOONLII PACK t 1• c nu' Gehl e l•tl 'ALAI? NO /TN 1 -111 ST ••1.l H•STINGI YI..t LIT 11 11/ HILLS Nett 1 1([101[10 Cl/KORAI, AA1lt G1011C HENNE;NN CO. QaeatTTe ll0(O(NStKI tj DIMM 1�/`V ANI PLAIN sl 'LONG 111 11 PAT. L..( IO7N •COYO I 1 CARVER CO. 9011440 I Art 111* 1.011008 1 C2 I cur(• I COtOG4II O•HLGRI 1 0YN0• 1 .1 RICA I 0(1101 I N•r1�0•G I — LAN 1NN •CISC• HANCOC4 I SELL( IL.INC 10 %SON IS BU•NS 1.01[1 PLTDSOTM ••••(IONN• 11 SOWS •0.1.• LA41 (KN ••.111( ST /e.IICII CHAM►LIN COOII OA•101 ...e i nt 11 SIRING LAN( I / 4(1111 I YIr11 SCOTT CO. I St l .w4INCI IODS I t r — /LAIN( it 0.• 51L 10 U 1.4 , .000 I•ST ANOK1 CO. .0001(1 Nu LAN1 E IO14A F I rIC NTICL ZS LANCIILLC (LAIN( 'ARINGTON •i - .NIT[ 1(•R J 4[ A NCO IS lC� �� �j 1101101 (10-11 / '. 044(1 SI J 101(1(((' 1T. r .. •(1-000 (L O • RA SEX CO. LIMN' • CrIKTM C01.0.110.15 6•1(1.4(1 1+.11•.1 I1 I 1 .1•1• (11.0 1 ?Ca Natiorn1t {y 1 O / (�� NYGO SCSI 1144[1 IS SON II; 44001• tl 1(101.11 INN IS1 fAI y( DAKOTA CO !0![00111 151441 LAB[ IOREST 1.041 .400•L( nxt PAUL Or SAIL 11ON I p I 1 a(1NILLIOY I i ( ''t l 0 0( A — 1 — — — r • 00 •w~ I A1 •';ool•H WASHINGTON CO. r 1 S10.1.0A1E0 014-1. t•41 (1r0 000010AT 11.001101100 10111 11011 1110011 CO1l.G( 60011 NCH SC•NOIS 5•1 0.1105N **CST Lan( 1.•00 ST (101■ 1/•[1.■ . /10,1 S.1SH.N L`f ••••■• MACIN 1]44( 0 TWA H 411 ••••1044 1 7f,.IGI •S Ia.r! NN• J • • • Ms. Susan F. Supina 2406 Oak Ridge Road Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Dear Ms. Supina: WLA /mlj Enc. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA 1'6 i a„, e _ -4 ,kodicej:j Q�v December 27, 1989 Thank you for your willingness to continue to serve on the Park & Recreation Commission. Your reappointment to a term ending January 1, 1992 was confirmed by the City Council at its regular meeting on December 19, 1989. The people of Stillwater as well as the City Council benefit greatly from your contribution of time and effort in dealing with problems coming before the Park & Recreation Commission. On behalf of all of them, I send this note of thanks. Sincerely, (1,4L r' Wallace C. Mayor P.S. Please sign the enclosed Oath of Office, have your signature acknowledged by a notary public and return the Oath to the City Clerk's Office in the enclosed envelope. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612 - 439 -6121 • Honorable T.al1y Abrahamson, Mayor City of Stillwater Municipal Building 216 North Fourth Street n Stillwater, : r. 55032 .:ear ..r. iiayor; It is my understanding that a vacancy on the Port Authority now exists. T respectfully request that you accept this as a formal application, among others that you receive, for consideration as you move tc fill tliis vacancy. During my term as mayor, the Port Authority was reactivated after many years of inactivity. Since that action ra.s taken by the City Council, the Port Authority has proved to be a valuable help to city government in being the sounding board for the many issues which have come up dealing with waterfront activity. The City Council has thus had the benefit of advance screening of those issues and has had good guidance in reaching decisions important to the welfare of the City. Your serious consideration of this application will be appreciated. Copies to: Councilmembers Bodiovick Farrell Kimble Opheim 922 North 'A11i .:a Street Stillwater, in 55032 January 21, 1990 • • DOWNTOWN BUSINESS PARKING TASK FORCE MEMBERS Business Owner Telephone Number Mad Capper Richard Chilson 439 -3953 Brick Alley Book David Anderson 439 -0266 Shorty Cleaners John Bourdaghs 439 -2250 Fancy Nancy's Cooie Mellen 430 -2648 Law Office Carl Ranum 439 -4143 Simonets Paul Simonet 439 -2110 Outfitters Dick Slachta 439 -4891 U.S. Post Office Dave Swanson 439 -3298 Police Chief Dave Mawhorter 439 -1336 • • 1 ater. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: STEVE RUSSELL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 31, 1990 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SETTING MARCH 20, 1990 AS THE DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON MODIFICATION TO TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT #1 (DESCH OFFICE BUILDING). BACKGROUND: On January 9, 1990 the City Council reviewed a request for Tax Increment Assistance for a three level office building located in the downtown area at the corner of Main and Mulberry Streets. The need for assistance is based on the poor soil conditions. At that meeting, Staff was directed to prepare the necessary Modification to the Development Program for the Tax Increment District and to work with the developer in preparing a Development Agreement. The attached resolution sets March 20, 1990 as the hearing date on the Modification. A Development Agreement should be available for Council review at that time. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of resolution setting the meeting for Modification of the Development Program for the regular Council meeting of March 20, 1990. ATTACHMENTS: Modified Development Plan Resolution setting hearing date for March 20, 1990 CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612- 439 -6121 • • Councilmember introduced the following resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION BY THE CITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NOS. 1 THROUGH 5 LOCATED WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO 1. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on Tuesday, March 20, 1990, at approximately p.m., to hold a public hearing on the following matters: (a) the proposed modification of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Development Program ") and (b) the proposed • modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts Nos. 1 through 5 located therein (the "Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans "), pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, to reflect increased project costs to be undertaken within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. Section 2. Notice of Hearing: Filina of Proaram. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be given as required by law, to distribute copies of the proposed Modified Development Program and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan (together, the "Plans ") to the Board of Commissioners of Washington County and the School Board of Independent School District No. 834, to place a copy of the Plans on file in the City Clerk's Office at City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public no later than February 22, 1990. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: • • t • whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota on February 6, 1990. Attest: City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor • • MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 INCLUDING MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1, (Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered Site Redevelopment District) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2, (Nelle Project) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3, (Arkell Project) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 (Woodland Lake Project) AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 (Brick Pond Project) OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA March 20, 1990 • • • (This Table of Contents is not part of the Modified Develop- ment Program and is only for convenience of reference.) Page SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 Subsection 1.1. Subsection 1.2. Subsection 1.3. Subsection 1.4. Subsection 1.5. Subsection 1.6. Subsection 1.7. Subsection 1.8. Subsection 1.9. Subsection 1.10. Subsection 1.11. Subsection 1.12. Subsection 1.13. Subsection 1.14. Subsection 1.15. EXHIBIT I -A SECTION II. Subsection 2.1. Subsection 2.2. Subsection 2.3. Subsection 2.4. Subsection 2.5. Subsection 2.6. Subsection 2.7. TABLE OF CONTENTS Definitions 1 -1 Statement and Finding of Public Purpose 1 -2 Statutory Authority 1 -3 Statement of Objectives 1 -4 Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data 1 -5 Environmental Controls 1 -11 Open Space to be Created 1 -11 Public Facilities to be Considered 1 -11 Proposed Reuse of Property 1 -12 Administration and Maintenance of Development District 1 -14 Rehabilitation 1 -14 Relocation. 1 -15 Boundaries of Development District 1 -15 Parcels to be Acquired or May Be Acquired in Whole or in Part Within the Development District 1 -17 Modification of Development Program for Development District No. 1 1 -18 Boundary Map of Development District No. 1 as of December 12, 1985 I -A -1 MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 Statement of Objectives 2 -1 Development Program 2 -1 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 2 -1 Parcels in Acquisition 2 -5 Development Activities Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 2 -5 Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been signed 2 -6 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 2 -6 • • Subsection 2.8. Subsection 2.9. Subsection 2.10. Subsection 2.11. Subsection 2.12. Subsection 2.13. Subsection 2.14. Subsection 2.15. EXHIBIT II -A EXHIBIT II -B EXHIBIT II -C EXHIBIT II -D EXHIBIT II -E EXHIBIT II -F SECTION III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 Subsection Subsection Subsection 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. Subsection 3.4. Subsection 3.5. Subsection 3.6. Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Estimated Original Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value Type of Tax Increment Financing District Duration of Tax Increment District No. 1 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Adopted May 7, 1985 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified October 1, 1985 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified December 12, 1985 II -C -1 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 as Modified November 3, 1987 Boundary Map of Tax Increment District No. 1 as of November Boundary Map of Tax Increment District No. 1 as Modified September 19, 1989 Financing 3, 1987 Financing 2 -7 2 -7 2 -7 2 -8 2 -10 Financing 2 -12 2 -12 2 -16 II-B-1 II -F -1 Statement of Objectives 3 -1 Development Program 3 -1 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 3 -1 Parcels in Acquisition 3 -2 Development Activity Expected to Occur within Tax Increment Financing District No 2 3 -2 Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed 3 -3 • • • Subsection 3.7. Subsection 3.8. Subsection 3.9. Subsection 3.10. Subsection 3.11. Subsection 3.12. Subsection 3.13. Subsection 3.14. Subsection 3.15. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 3 -3 Estimated Cost of Project 3 -3 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 3 -3 Sources of Revenue 3 -3 Estimated Original Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value 3 -4 Type of Tax Increment Financing District 3 -5 Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 3 -5 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 3 -5 Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 3 -7 EXHIBIT III -A Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 as Adopted December 12, 1985 III -A -1 EXHIBIT III -B Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 as established December 12, 1985 III -B -1 SECTION IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 Subsection 4.1. Subsection 4.2. Subsection 4.3. Subsection 4.4. Subsection 4.5. Subsection 4.6. Subsection 4.7. Subsection 4.8. Subsection 4.9. Subsection 4.10. Subsection 4.11. Subsection 4.12. Subsection 4.13. Statement of Objectives 4 -1 Development Program 4 -1 Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 4 -1 Parcels in Acquisition 4 -1 Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed 4 -2 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 4 -2 Estimated Cost of Project 4 -2 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 4 -3 Sources of Revenue 4 -3 Estimated Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment 4 -3 Type of Tax Increment Financing District 4 -4 Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 4 -5 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 4 -5 • • Subsection 4.14. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 as Adopted December 12, 1985 EXHIBIT IV -A EXHIBIT IV -B Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 as established December 12, 1985 SECTION V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 Subsection 5.1. Subsection 5.2. Subsection 5.3. Subsection 5.4. Subsection 5.5. Subsection 5.6. Subsection 5.7. Subsection 5.8. Subsection 5.9. Subsection 5.10. Subsection 5.11. Subsection 5.12. Subsection 5.13. Subsection 5.14. EXHIBIT V -A EXHIBIT V -B Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 Parcels in Acquisition Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District Estimated Cost of Project Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness Sources of Revenue Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment Type of Tax Increment Financing District Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 Portions of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 as Adopted April 1, 1986 Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 as established April 1, 1986 4 -7 IV -A -1 IV -B -1 5 -1 5 -1 5-1 5 -1 5 -2 5 -2 5 -2 5 -3 5 -3 5 -3 5 -4 5 -5 5 -5 5 -7 V -A -1 V -B -1 • • • SECTION VI. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 Subsection 6.1. Subsection 6.2. Subsection 6.3. Subsection 6.4. Subsection 6.5. Subsection 6.6. Subsection 6.7. Subsection 6.8. Subsection 6.9. Subsection 6.10. Subsection 6.11. Subsection 6.12. Subsection 6.13. Subsection 6.14. EXHIBIT VI -A Statement of Objectives Development Program Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 6 -1 Parcels in Acquisition 6 -2 Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Signed 6 -2 Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District 6 -2 Estimated Cost of Project 6 -3 Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness 6 -3 Sources of Revenue Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment 6 -3 Type of Tax Increment Financing District 6 -3 Duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 6 -4 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 6 -5 Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 6 -5 Boundary Map of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 as established June 20, 1989 EXHIBIT VI -B "But For" Finding EXHIBIT VI -C Adjustments to Original Value APPENDIX A Administrative Guide for the Administration of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1 6 -1 6 -1 6 -3 • VI -A -1 VI -B -A VI -C -A A -1 Exhibit 1 Model Information Form to be Submitted to the School Board, Washington County Board, and the office of the Minnesota State Auditor 1 -A -1 • • • STATUTORY REFERENCES During the 1987 Minnesota Legislative Session, the development statutes were recodified into one chapter, Chapter 469 of Minnesota Statutes. The following table cross - references the previous statutory cites with the recodified cites. Previous Statutory Recodified Cite Cite 472A.01 469.124 472A.02 469.125 472A.03 469.126 472A.04 469.127 472A.05 469.128 472A.06 469.129 . 472A.09 469.130 472A.10 469.131 472A.11 469.132 472A.12 469.133 472A.13 469.134 273.73 469.174 273.74 469.175 273.75 469.176 273.76 469.177 273.77 469.178 273.78 469.179 Chapter 474 469.152 - 469.165 • • Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Development Program attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's development objectives as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City Council has created, established and designated Development District No. 1 pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.126. On February 21, 1989, the City Council modified the Modified Development Program and the tax increment financing plans for all tax increment financing districts located within Development District No. 1 to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No. 1. therewith: MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN The following municipal action was taken in connection Mav 7, 1985: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was adopted by the City Council. October 1, 1985: The Development Program for Develop- ment District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to modify the project area boundaries. December 12, 1985: The Development Program for Devel- opment District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to modify the project area boundaries. February 21, 1989: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No. 1 and increased project costs. June 20, 1989: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. September 19, 1989: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect a change of the parcels to be or may be acquired within Development District No. 1. March 20, 1990: The Development Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. • • The following municipal action was taken with regard to the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within Development District No. 1: Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered Site Redevelopment District): Mav 7, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was adopted by the City Council. October 1. 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. November 3, 1987: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No. 1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased costs. September 19, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. March 20, 1990: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 (Nelle Project): December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was adopted by the City Council. February 21. 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No. 1. • • ect): Project): June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. March 20, 1990: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 (Arkell Proj- December 12, 1985: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was adopted by the City Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No. 1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. March 20, 1990: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 (Woodland Lake April 1. 1986: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was adopted by the City Council. February 21, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master plan concept within Development District No. 1. June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the project area and increased project costs. March 20, 1990: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. . Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 (Brick Pond Project).: • • June 20, 1989: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 was adopted by the City Council. March 20, 1990: Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. • SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Subsection 1.1. Definitions. The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Development Program, have the mean- ings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires: "City" means the City of Stillwater, a municipal corpo- ration and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota desig- nated as a home rule charter city. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan which contains the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "Council" means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body. "County" means the County of Washington, Minnesota. "Development District Act" means the statutory provi- sions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended and supplemented. "Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is created and established hereto pursuant to and in accordance with the Development District Act, and is geographically described in Section I, Subsection 1.13 of the Development Program. "Development Proaram" means this Development Program for Development District No. 1, initially adopted by the Council on May 7, 1985, and as it has been modified. As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subdivision 3, a development program is a statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space to be created, the environmental controls to be applied, the proposed reuse of private property and the proposed operations of the district after the capital improvements within the district have been completed. "Master Proiect" means that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for each Tax Increment Financing District within Development • District has been modified to include the cost of the public improvements authorized in all the other Tax Increment Financing Plans for all other Tax Increment Financing Districts with the Development District. This has the effect of allowing tax 1 -1 . increment generated from any Tax Increment Financing District to be used for the payment of any public improvements authorized with the Development District. • • "Municipal Industrial Development Act" means the statu- tory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165. "Municipality" means any city, however organized, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, subd. 2. " Project Area" means the Development District as geo- graphically described in Section I, Subsection 1.13, of the Development Program. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds issued and to be issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with the Development District as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District within the Development District. The term "Tax Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds. "Tax Increment Financina District" means any tax incre- ment financing district presently established or to be estab- lished in the future in the Development District. "Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive. "Tax Increment Financina Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan, and as the same shall be modified, for each Tax Increment Financing District located within the Project Area. pose. Subsection 1.2. Statement and Finding of Public Pur- (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) It is found that there is a need for new development in the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, to encourage development within areas which are already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the local tax base and to improve the general tax base of the state. The Council of the City determines that there is a need for development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City in the Development District to provide employment oppor- tunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general 1 -2 • economy of the State. It is found that the area within the Development District is potentially more useful and valuable than is being realized under existing development, is less productive than is possible under this program and, therefore, is not con- tributing to the tax base to its full potential. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely through private investment in the foreseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment financing plans will afford maximum oppor -. tunity, consistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Development District by private enterprise. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. • Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City of Stillwater proposes to designate a portion of the city as a municipal development district as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. According to Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.02, Subdivision 11, a development district is a specific area within the corporate limits of a municipality which has been so designated and separately numbered by the governing body. The City of Stillwater also plans to utilize the devel- opment finance provisions encompassed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 -78, the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, in conjunction with the designation of the municipal development district. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) The City of Stillwater designated a portion of the city as a municipal development district and is proposing to modify the boundary as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. According to Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.02, Subdivision 11, . a development district is a specific area within the corporate limits of a municipality which has been so designated and sepa- rately numbered by the governing body. 1 -3 • • • The City of Stillwater is also utilizing and proposes to modify the development finance provisions encompassed in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71 -78, the Minnesota Tax Incre- ment Financing Act, in conjunction with the modification of the municipal development district. Subsection 1.4. Statement of Obiectives. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, determines that it is necessary, desirable and in the public interest to establish, designate, develop, and administer a development district in the City of Stillwater pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. The City of Stillwater determines that the funding of the necessary activi- ties and improvements in the development district shall be accom- plished through tax increment financing - in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 -78. The City of Stillwater and the Stillwater City Council seek to achieve the following objectives through this development plan: 1. Acquire land or space which is vacant, unused, under used, or inappropriately used. 2. Improve the financial base of the City. 3. Provide employment opportunities through the creation of new jobs. 4. Encourage the renovation and expansion of existing businesses and historic structures. 5. Acquire property containing structurally substandard buildings and remove structurally substandard buildings for which rehabilitation is not feasible. 6. Eliminate blighting influences which impede potential development. 7. Coordinate elements of the City's Central Business District Revitalization Plan with these project objectives. 8. Provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) 9. Provide adequate public improvements and utilities to enhance the area for new development. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) • • 10. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. 11. Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living stan- dards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and un- skilled labor and other human resources in the City. 12. Secure the increase of housing, commercial, and indus- trial property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School District No. 834, Washington County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to -pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. 13. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in and adjacent to the Development District, neces- sary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Develop- ment District and adjacent areas of the City. 14. Promote the concentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessi- bility and prominence in the City. 15. Encourage local business expansion, improvements, and development, whenever possible. 16. Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings. 17. Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of existing areas and structures which are compat- ible with the Development Program. Subsection 1.5. Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data. The estimated costs of the public improvements to be made within the Development District and financed by tax increments will be derived from the tax increment financing districts within the Development District. • • (Tax Increment Financing District No. 1) (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Public Improvements Utility upgrading New development Park improvements Utility extensions Public accesses Land Acquisition Park development Public accesses Other Public Costs Relocation Demolition Planning /engineering Administration Capitalized interest Contingency Total Estimate $3,100,000* - 3,700,000 * It is estimated that approximately $60,000 to $90,000 of the $3,700,000 could be financed with the first phase of tax incre- ments from the restaurant. It is expected that approximately $9,000 to $13,000 of tax increments will be available for amorti- zing a bond or "pay as you go." All phases will be implemented only if there are suffi- cient tax increment revenues from new development in the dis- trict. Future phase expenditures may require future bond issues to "front -end" future phase costs. Range $1,300,000 - 1,500,000 $300,000 - 500,000 $1,500,000 - 1,700,000 • Public Improvements Utility upgrading New development Park improvements Utility extensions Public accesses Land Acquisition Park development Public accesses Other Public Costs Relocation Demolition Planning /engineering Administration Capitalized interest Contingency (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) Total Estimate $3,400,000* - 4,050,000 * It is estimated that approximately $60,000 to $90,000 of the $3,700,000 could be financed with the first phase of tax incre- ments from the restaurant. It is expected that approximately $9,000 to $13,000 of tax increments will be available for amorti- zing a bond or "pay as you go." If all development listed in Appendix A of Exhibit II -B as bonded projects is completed, an additional $1,360,000 could be available for project expenses. All phases will be implemented only if there are suffi- cient tax increment revenues from new development in the dis- trict. Future phase expenditures may require future bond issues to "front -end" future phase costs. Rance $1,300,000 - 1,500,000 $500,000 - 750,000 $1,600,000 - 1,800,000 • • • AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) The following budget may have to be amended from time to time as priorities change and as tax increments become avail- able. Land Acquisition Additional Public Improvements consisting of: site preparation, relocation, utility extension, utility upgrading, park improvements, parking improvements, planning /engineering and administration Total of Additional Public Improvements $5,500,000* * As bonds are not anticipated at this time, -the above - listed public improvements will be completed as tax increments are generated and available. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Land Acquisition $250,000 Utilities 118,435 Site Preparation 89,760 Landscaping 53,269 Interest Reimbursement 62,833 Professional Services 15,000 Contingency 10,000 Capitalized Interest 126,125 Bond Discount 10,500 Costs of Issuance /Plan 20,000 SEADC 10,000 City Administration . 14,000 TOTAL $779,922* * The City will issue bonds in the principal amount not to exceed $700,000, with a final maturity in 2002. Based upon prevailing interest rates at the time of issuance, the amount available for project costs shall be that amount after capital- ized interest, bond discount and expenses of the City have been deducted. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) Demolition and clearance $ Excavation 83,300 Concrete walls, footings, columns, berms 166,750 Waterproofing /perimeter insulation 3,000 Reinforcing steel 28,G00 Face brick at ramp and seawall 8,000 1 -8 $2,500,000 3,000,000 • • s Site electricity Contractor fees Site improvements, including irrigation, utilities, curb/ gutter, dumpster screenwall City Administrative Fee Total *The City has determined to provide assistance to the developer on a pay as you go basis in a total amount not to exceed $600,000. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 1985) NELLE PROJECT Rance* Land Acquisition $240,000 - $ 500,000 Public Improvements /Parking 124,500 - 1,922,500 Bonding /Legal /Administration 20,000 - 185,000 Capitalized Interest (3 yrs.) 131,500 - 892,500 TOTAL $516,000 - $3,500,000 * It is estimated that a bond of approximately $516,000 could be issued with the first 30 unit inn expansion of the development at the "low" range. The "high" range would include a 50 unit inn expansion, a 100 unit hotel addition, 20 unit motel, an acceler- ated learning center and related public space, parlor /banquet rooms, food service/ utility and parking based upon the developer's construction plan, and would support a $3,500,000 bond. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED DECEMBER 12, 1985) ARKELL,PROJECT Estimate Land Acquisition and $ 803,000 Site Improvements soil corrections utilities site preparation Bonding /Legal /Administration 91,000 Capitalized Interest 306,000 TOTAL $1,200,000 14,000 17,500 113,000 60,000 $660,000* • • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED APRIL 1, 1986) WOODLAND LAKES DEVELOPMENT Land Acquisition Site Corrections Removal /Replacement of Topsoil Pond Construction /Controls Clearing and Grubbing Soil Testing Public Improvements Lift Station /Force Mains Sanitary Sewer Water Mains Storm Sewer Road Construction Landscaping Electrical Power Distribution Lighting /Traffic Controls $814,000 226,000 55,000 39,000 20,000 92,400* 200,000 350,000 245,000 750,000 100,000 380,000 100,000 * Estimated on a 66% of total cost payable by Woodland Lakes Other Public Costs Engineering 380,000 Legal 25,000 Surveying 5,500 Contingency 410,000 Total Estimates $4,192,500 ** ** The total dollar amount does not include capitalized inter- est or other bonding costs. These costs would need to be calcu- lated as part of a larger bond issue. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 BRICK POND PROJECT ESTIMATE Land Acquisition $ 60,000 Park Improvements 50,000 Green belt buffer and landscaping 250,000 Utility Assessment Reduction 200,000 Administrative 56,000 $ 616,000* *The total dollar amount does not include capitalized interest or other bonding costs, if any. These costs would need to be • calculated as part of a larger bond issue. • • • Subsection 1.6. Environmental Controls. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The proposed redevelopment projects in the Development District do not present any permanent environmental problems. All municipal actions, public improvements, and private develop- ment shall be carried out in a manner that will enhance, rather than detract from the natural environment. All necessary envi- ronmental permits and clearances will be obtained. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The proposed development activities in the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing envi- ronmental standards. Subsection 1.7. Open Space to be Created. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) In addition to the provisions of Chapter 472A.02, Subdivision 6, some open space may be created for the purpose of enhancing housing development and providing circulation of pedestrian traffic, special landscaping of residential and public property, and creation of recreational facilities including parks and walkways. The open space will be aimed at the improvement of the quality of life, quality of transportation and the physical facilities. Subsection 1.8. Public Facilities to be Considered. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City, in carrying out its objectives shall consider the construction of the following public facilities, when finan- cially feasible, and when needed to encourage desirable private development or when considered desirable in order to promote and enhance existing development. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Revitalization within the Development District must be financially feasible, marketable and compatible with longer range City development plans. The following recommendations represent the options that satisfy the development for the Project area in the initial state while taking advantage of opportunities which are currently available. • • • ings, 1. Clearance and redevelopment, 2. Rehabilitation of buildings to remain, 3. Relocation of buildings and the inhabitants of build- 4. Vacation of rights -of -way, 5. Dedication of new rights -of -way, 6. New construction and expansion of commercial and indus- trial buildings, 7. Land acquisition, 8. North -end development assistance, and 9. Installation or replacement of public and private facilities and utilities. Subsection 1.9. Proposed Reuse of Property. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) 1. Current Land Use The current land uses in the development district include public /semi - public, residential, multi - family residen- tial, industrial, land consumptive /highway oriented commercial and retail /office /service commercial. The development sites are or will be zoned in conformance with zoning standards for commer- cial and industrial uses. 2. Proposed Reuse of Land It is proposed that a portion of the property identi- fied in Section C of the Development Plan will be acquired for the construction of a restaurant and bank expansion. The restau- rant site is capable of accommodating 6,000 square feet of on- site development plus related deck, patio space and parking. Certain existing structures will be relocated or demolished to prepare for this development. The size of the bank expansion is yet to be determined as well as the extent of rehabilitation of certain buildings in the "historic district." (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) In addition, several individual developments are planned for certain vacant parcels in the industrial park. • • (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) It is proposed that a portion of the property identi- fied in Subsection 1.14 of the Development Plan will be acquired for the construction of an elderly housing development. The 35 acre site is capable of accommodating 283 units of residential rental development plus related retail /limited commercial devel- opment and parking. The development parcel is currently vacant. Phase I will consist of 64 units of lowrise housing, Phase IIA will be 80 units of lowrise housing the Phase IIB will be a two story 75 unit development. Phase IIIA is estimated to include a shopping /retail facility and Phase IIIB consists of 64 units of lowrise housing. The city may also assist with the public im- provement and land acquisition costs for the expansion of an existing hotel. This project is further described in Ex- hibit IV -A. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989)- The public improvements needed to bring about the new development include site improvements, and general improvements. The estimated public improvement costs are referenced in the tax increment financing plan and are collectively described in Sub- section 1.5. The Development Program does not contemplate the acqui- sition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and /or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. Subsection 1.10. Administration and Maintenance of Development District. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 5, 1985) Maintenance and operation of the public improvements in the municipal development district will be the responsibility of the development district administration of the City. Each year the administrator of the municipal development district will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget • for the following year to be charged to the property in the district. The City Council will certify the assessments to the County Auditor for collection. The City Council will levy these 1 -13 assessments, if any, in accordance with the procedures estab- lished in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061. • (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) The municipal development district administrator will administer the municipal development district pursuant to the provisions of Section 472A.10 of the Minnesota Statutes provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the City Council. No action taken by the administrator of the development district pursuant to the above - mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the City Council. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Coordinator of the City who shall serve as Administrator of the Development District. The powers, duties and responsibilities of the Administrator are spelled out in the Administrative Guide for the Administration of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1, attached hereto as Appendix A. Each year the Administrator will submit to the Council the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. Subsection 1.11. Rehabilitation. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Although the City has designated a rehabilitation zone to target such improvements within the Central Business District, no rehabilitation standards nor a formal program for rehabilita- tion of buildings has been adopted. The City will encourage the use of industrial development revenue bonds or notes (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474) for rehabilitation, renovation and expan- sion of existing buildings in the project as well as State of Minnesota grant funds and tax increment proceeds. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Owners of properties within the Development District will be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of properties who purchase property within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as a condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources. • • • Subsection 1.12. Relocation. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The City accepts its binding obligations under provi- sions of federal and state law (Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 through 117.56) for relocation and will administer payment benefits to individuals and businesses to be displaced by public action. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City accepts its responsibility for providing for relocation pursuant to Section 469.133 of the Development Dis- trict Act. Subsection 1.13. Boundaries of Development District. Boundaries of Development District No. 1 as established Mav 7, 1985. Beginning at a point of intersection with the center lines of Aspen Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence southerly from said point along the center- line of Third Street to a point of intersec- tion with the centerline of Orleans Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline, as extended between Everet Street and Washington Street, to its intersection with the easterly right -of -way line of County Road No 5; thence southwesterly from said point and along said right -of -way line to its intersection with the southern municipal boundary; thence easterly more or less, from said point along said southerly municipal boundary to its intersection with the west- erly shoreline of Lake St. Croix; thence northerly from said point and along said shoreline to its intersection with the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence westerly from said point along said center- line to its intersection with the centerline of First Street; thence northerly from said point and along said centerline to a point of intersection with the centerline of Aspen Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to the point of beginning. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER 1, 1985) Beginning at a point of intersection with the center lines of Aspen Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence 1 -15 Ie southerly from municipal boundary; thence easterly more or less, from said point along said southerly municipal boundary to its intersection with the westerly shoreline of Lake St. Croix; thence northerly from said point and along said shoreline to its INTER- SECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF ST. CROIX AVENUE, AS EXTENDED; THENCE WESTERL Y ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY FROM SAID POINT AND ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO ITS intersection with the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of First Street; thence northerly from said point and along said centerline to a point of intersec- tion with the centerline of Aspen Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline to the point of beginning. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12, 1985) e Beginning at a point of intersection with the center lines of Aspen Street and Third Street, City of Stillwater, Minnesota; thence southerly from said point along the center- line of Third Street to a point of intersec- tion with the centerline of Orleans Street; thence westerly from said point along said centerline, as extended between Everet Street and Washington Street, to its intersection with the easterly right-of-way line of parcel 9032-2620, thence northerly along said eas- terly line to its intersection with the northerly line of parcel 9032-2620; thence easterly along said northerly line to its intersection with the easterly right-of-way line of County Road No 5; thence south- w~sterly from said point and along said right-of-way line to its intersection wi th the southern municipal boundary; thence easterly more or less, from said point along said southerly municipal boundary to its intersection with the westerly shoreline of Lake St. Croix; thence northerly from said point and along said shoreline to its inter- section with the centerline of St. Croix Avenue, as extended; thence westerly along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Main Street; thence southerly from said point and along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of Elm Street, as extended; thence westerly from e 1-16 e said point along said centerline to its intersection with the centerline of First Street~ thenc~ northerly from said point and along said centerline to a point of intersec- tion with the centerline of Aspen Street: thence westerly from said point along said centerline to the point of beginning. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying easterly of County Highway No. 66, and lying Northerly of a line from a point on the centerline of County Highway No. 66, 250.35 feet South of the North line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, to a point on the East line of said Southwest Quarter . of the. Southeast Quarter 250.03 feet South of the North line.' Subject to easements of record. e That part of the West 128 feet of the East 555 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right-of-way of State Trunk Highway 212 (State Highway No. 36), except the North 661.4 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. That part of the East 427 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway 212 (State Highway No. 36), except the North 661.4 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. e That part of the West Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right- of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of record. That part of the East Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota~ and the West Half of the East Half except the Easterly 300 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter lying North of the Northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of ~ecord. I-I? e The East 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, except that part lying Southerly of a line 350 feet North of and parallel to the Northerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway No. 36). That part of the West 135 feet of the East 300 feet of the West Half of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying Northerly of the North right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway 36) and lying Southerly of a line 350 feet North of and parallel to said North right-of-way line. Subsection 1.14. Parcels To Be Acquired or May Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District. ., e (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) (Tax Increment Financing District No I) PIN 9028-0030 11022-2000 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 2) PIN 10691-3950 10691-3830 10691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 10691-3770 10691-4040 10691-4010 10691-4070 l069l-3990 10691-3980 10691-3740 (Tax Increment Financing District No. 3) PIN 9032-2620 .- e 1-18 e (Tax Increment Financing District NO.4) PIN 9032-2610 9032-2612 (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) (Tax Increment Financing District NO.5) That part of the West Half of the West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 30 North, Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying North of the Northerly right- of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 (State Highway No. 36). Subject to easements of record. (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) (Tax Increment Financing District No. I) e PIN 10691-3590 10691-3650 10691-2000 10691-2030 10691-2060 10691-2090 10691-2120 (Tax Increment Financing District NO.2) PIN 10691-3720 10691-3740 10691-3770 10691-2150 (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) (Tax Increment Financing District NO.1) PIN 10690-2050 10690-6950 11022-2050 e 1-19 e e e Subsection 1.15. Modification of Development Proqram for Development District No. I. I. On October I, 1985, the Development Program was modi- fied by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area. 2. On December 12, 1985, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area. 3. On February 21, 1989, the Development Program was modi- fied by the City Council to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No 1 and increased project costs. 4. On June 20, 1989, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect an enlargement of the Project -Area and increased project costs. 5. On September 19, 1989, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect a change in the parcels to be or may be acquired within the Project Area. 6. On March 20, 1990, the Development Program was modified by the City Council to reflect increased project costs. -- 1-20 e SECTION II. MODIFIED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I (Downtown and Industrial Park Scattered Site Redevelopment District) (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) NOTE: As of February 21, 1989, the City has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing districts located wi thin Development Distr ict No. I. Tax Increment Financing District No. I was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on May 7, 1985. The Tax Increment Financing Plan was subsequently modified on October I, 1985, December 12, 1985, November 3, 1987 and February 21, 1989. This Section II is provided to combine all modifications into one document. Attached as Exhibits IIA, II-B, II-C and. .II-D. are portions of the original plan and modifications through November 3, 1987, which are not required to be provided in the Tax Increment Financing Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision I, and therefore are not reflected in this Section II. e Subsection 2.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 2.2. Development ProQram. Modified Development Program for Development Subsections l.l through 1.15. See Section I, District No. I, Subsection 2.3. Parcels to Increment Financing District No. I. located in the City of Stillwater, County Minnesota: be Included in Tax The following parcels of Washington, State of (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Parcel ~dentification Number Fee Owner e 9028-0020 9028-0050 9033-2364 9033-2374 9033-2378 10200-2300 10200-2325 10200-2350 10200-2550 10690-2000 10690-2050 10690-2150 Muller Boat Works Maple Island Farm, Inc. UFE, Inc. Beim Construction Company H & I Wood Specialties Goetz, James B. Goetz, James B. Kern, 0.; Skinner, N.; et al Meisterling, Orn & Powell Atwood Forge & Foundry Co. McGuire, Michael G. ~ Muller Boat Works 2-1 e 10690-4050 10690-6900 10690-6950 10690-7000 10690-7050 10690-7100 10690-7150 10690-7200 10690-7250 10690-7300 10690-7350 10690-7400 10690-7450 l0690-7500 10690-7550 10691-2390 10691-2450 10691-2510 10691-2540 10691-2570 10691-2600 1069l-2660 10691-2720 10691-2750 10691-2752 10691-2780 10691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 10691-410Q 10691-4130 10691-4160 10691-5540 10691-5570 10691-5600 10691-5630 10691-5660 10691-5960 10691-5720 10691-5750 10691-5780 10691-5810 10692-2900 10692-3050 10692-3100 10692-3200 10692-3220 10692-3250 10692-3270 10692-3700 10692-3750 10692-3800 10692-3850 10692-3900 ABS Co. McGuire, Michael G. McGuire, Michael G. Olson, William Jr. and Dellaina Olson, William Jr. and Dellaina Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Belideau, Edna E. Belideau, Milton H. and Edna E. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Stillwater Mfg. Co. Olson, William Jr. and Dellaina Powell, William H. Nyberg, Clark R. and Orff, Judd E. Malon, Donald Malon, Donald Filson, Bruce F. Filson, Bruce F. Sicard, Dale Standefer, James E. and Rice, J.D. Standefer, John R. et al Lind, Leslie R. Hooley, Charles M. and John W. Northern Federal S & L Assoc. Nelle, Inc. Nelle, Inc. Berrisford, Anne E. Baglo, Clarence V. and Violet M. Thompson, Richard E. and Elenore Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Washington Federal Sav & Ln Kemper, Fredrick L. Liedle, Paul Frye, Ed W. and Del H. St. Croix Drug Co. Peder Gaalaas Inc. Farmers Union Grain Terminal New Stillwater Project Ltd. Lease Commander Mills New Stillwater Project Ltd. New Stillwater Project Ltd. New Stillwater Project Ltd. City of Stillwater J. L. H. Inc. Paukert, Richard E. and Carol M. Paukert, Richard E. and Carol M. Tuenge, Richard R. Kielsa, Donald R. and Marlene J. e e 2-2 e 10692-4250 10692-5200 10693-2310 1.1022-2000 11022-2050 11140-2000 11140-2100 11140-2200 11140-2300 11159-2050 11159-2400 11159-2600 11159-2650 11159-2700 11159-2950 11999-2100 11999-2300 Gordon, Sherman & Lucille Gordon, Sherman & Lucille State of Minnesota Langness, Robert o. McGuire, Michael G. Hauge, Lawrence O. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence O. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hauge, Lawrence o. and Lois C. Hooley, Charles M. Washington Federal Sav & Ln Hooley, John Hadrath et al Stillwater Bancorporation Stillwater Bancorporation Super Value Stores Super Value Stores N.P. Railway Co. (PARCELS DELETED AS OF OCTOBER I, 1985) PIN Fee Owner e 10200-2300 10200-2325 10692-3270 11159-2400 Goetz, James B. Goetz, James B. City of Stillwater Washington Federal Sav & Ln (PARCELS INCLUDED AS OF OCTOBER I, 1985) PIN Fee Owner e 9028-0030 9033-2353 9615-2800 10691-3230 10691-3260 10691-3290 10691-3320 10691-2900 10691-2.930 1069l-2990 10691-3020 10691-3050 10691-3080 10691-3110 1069l-3140 10691-5900 10691-5930 10691-5990 10691-6050 10691-3350 10691-3380 10691-3410 10691-3440 State of Minnesota N-F Properties, Inc. Broleck, a Mn Partnership Ogren, John K. City of Stillwater City of Stillwater City of Stillwater Van Meier, Katherine Ranum, Ruth C. Meister, Carl W. Madsen, Jens C. and Sandra J. RY99, Robert H. & Doris M. Jones, David E. Melton, James E. & Joyce A. Schneider, Richard L. St. John's Home Corp. Thompson, Robert B. Hudson, Thomas M. & Eleanor Hudson, Thomas M. & Eleanor Maple Island Farm Inc. Maple Island Farm Inc. Maple Island Farm Inc. Maple Island Farm Inc. 2-3 e 10691-3470 10691-6020 11l59-3000 11l59-3050 1l140-2400 11999-2l50 11999-2200 11999-2350 99908-0700 99908-0500 Maple Island Farm Inc. Schley, Emma Lou Hooley, John Hadrath et al Hooley, John Hadrath et al st. Croix III Limited Partner N. P. Railway Co. N. P. Railway Co. N. P. Railway Co. Maple Island Farm Inc. Super Value Stores (PARCELS DELETED AS OF DECEMBER 12, 1985) PIN Fee Owner 1069l-2780 10691-2900 10691-3230 I0691-3860 10691-3890 10691-3920 1069l-4100 1069l-4l30 10691-4l60 Hooley, Charles M. & John W. Van Meier, Katherine Ogren, John K. Northern Federal S & L Assoc~ - Nelle, Inc. Nelle, Inc. Berresford, Anne E. Baglo, Clarence V. and Violet M. Thompson, Richard E. & Elenore e (PARCELS INCLUDED AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 1987) PIN Fee Owner e I0690-3750 10690-3800 I0690-3900 10692-3300 10692-3320 10692-3350 10692-3450 10692-3470 10692-3550 10692-3650 10692-3500 I0693-4100 I0693-2050 10691-5390 9033-2351 9033-2425 9900-2050 9900-2100 10200-2300 10200-2325 l1159-2000 11159-2025 11159-2400 9900-2000 9033-2372 Hohlt, Dessa & Trenda et al Fraser, Caroline L. Thompson, David C. & Mary Jo Nyberg, Clark R. Pritchard, Jean R. Sherburne, Duane E. & Jean A. Martin, Larry J. Anderson, Martin D. Hooley, William J. & Joan M. Turnbladh, Will C. Jr. Albright, Robert L. and Sandra J. Nolde, Donald F. & Marianne Bourbaghs, John Adams, W. Michael Swager, Gary D., Nominee Strohkirch, Dennis Immuno Nuclear Co. Immuno Nuclear Co. Goetz, James B. Goetz, James B. Pauley, Bill J. and Kern, Oscar Pauley, Bill J. and Kern, Oscar l501 Partnership Anderson, Dennis UFE Inc. 2-4 e e e 9033-2376 9210-2050 9210-2000 9615-2900 95033-2250 Ogren, John K. . Bowman, Richard S. Bowman, Richard S. Feely, Leonard R. & Elizabeth Anez, Brunette R. (PARCELS INCLUDED AS OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) PIN Fee Owner 10691-6080 10693-2100 10691-3540 10691-3560 1069l-3590 10691-3620 10691-3650 State of Minnesota City of Stillwater Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association Stillwater Housing Association A more specific description is available from the City Clerk's Office. FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 2.4. Parcels in Acquisition. The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Section I, Subsection 1.14, of the Development Program. As the City acquires said parcels, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 will be modified to reflect the acquisitions of said parcels. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: (1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of the tax increment financing plan; and (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 2.5. Development Acti vi ties Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. (AS ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The developers plan to construct a 6,000 square foot restaurant and related parking, 500,000 square feet of industr ial/off ice buildings in the industr ial/commercial plants as well as miscellaneous downtown commercial rehahili tat ion of existing buildings. The developer may be assisted with a portion 2-5 e of the acquisition, relocation, demolition, clearance, public facility and parking costs associated with the various phases of development through tax increments generated as a result of these developments. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) One developer plans to construct a 5,500 square foot industrial/office building and two developers plan expansions (40,000 square feet and 70,000 square feet) to existing industrial/office facilities. Tax increments generated from these developments may be used for land acquisition as well as public improvements consisting of: site preparation, relocation, utility upgrading, utility extensions, park improvements, parking improvements, planning/engineering and administration as determined by the City. See Appendix A of Exhibit II-B for. proposed . bonded ..' projects, as of October I, 1985. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) e The 40,000 square foot industrial/office expansion mentioned above will be undertaken by INCSTAR Corporation, which plan to construct a 38,000 square foot office building and remodel and convert the existing office building to industrial use. Tax increment assistance may be used for land acquisition, as well as public improvements consisting of: utilities, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, watermain, site preparation, landscaping, holding pond, capitalized interest, professional fees and administration, as determined by the City. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) Mark and Gloria Desch plan to construct a three story office building at North Main and Mulberry Streets, containing IS, 000 square feet of rentable space. Tax increment assistance may be provided on a "pay as you go" basis to undertake public improvements consisting of: site preparation: grading, landscaping.and drainage improvements. Subsection 2.6. Development Activitv in the Tax Increment Financinq District for which Contracts have been Siqned. The following contracts have been entered into by the City of Stillwater and the persons named below: (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) It is expected that the Phase I developments will have executed development contracts no later than the fall of 1985. e 2-6 e e e (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) As the developers will not be assisted by the City with their developments, no development contracts are anticipated at this time. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) It is anticipated that the City and INCSTAR Corporation will have entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment no later than February 21, 1989. (As Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection 2.7. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) As a part of the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelopment district, the other phases of the program may provide for additional public. facilities, business relocation and land acquisition. In addition, the City may assist with the rehabilitation of historic structures within the district, parking, and additional industrial expansion. Depending on the availability of public funds, the Phase II development should commence within the next two years. (As specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 2.8. Estimated Cost of Project. See Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associated with the Development District. Subsection Indebtedness. Estimated of Bonded 2.9. Amount (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) An estimate of the amount of bonded indebtedness for Phase I is expected to be $60,000 to $90,000. The term of the issue is 15 years and the interest rate is expected to be 10 percent. The amount of capitalized interest is estimated to be $15,OOO to $23,000. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) If all of the development occurs listed in Appendix A of Exhibit II-B that has bond allocations, the $200,000 tax increment could amortize an additional $1,360,OOO. -~ 2-7 e e e (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) It is not anticipated that any additional bonded indebtedness relating to the recent developments will occur at this time. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) It is anticipated that the amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred in regard to the INCSTAR Corporation project will not exceed $700,000. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) It is anticipated that no bonded indebtedness will be incurred with respect to the Desch project, but that assistance in a total amount not to exceed $600,000 will be provided on a "pay as you go" basis. Subsection 2.10. Sources of Revenue. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Several sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects in the municipal development district including tax increment financing, industr ial revenue bonds, 312 rehabili tation loans, and Small Cities Development Grant funds. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. The restaurant is expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1986 at which time the development will generate an annual tax increment of $9,000 to $13, 800 collectable in 1987 once fiscal disparities has been allocated to the metro pool. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) An additional $200,000 could be available (after fiscal disparities) if all of the bond financed development is completed. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) Several sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects located within the municipal development district. These sources include tax increments, industrial revenue bonds, 312 rehabilitation loans, Small Cities Development Grant funds, and special assessments. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes to assist in the financing of publiS development costs. 2-8 e e e Of the three proposed additional developments included within Tax Increment Financing District No. I a partial increment is expected to be received in 1989 with the full increment to be received in 1990. The additional development will generate an annual tax increment of approximately $177,657.91, collectible in 1990 after fiscal disparities has been allocated to the metro pool. Subsection 2.11. Estimated Oriqinal Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value*. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the property by the County Assessor in 1984.- This assessed value' is $3,600,000. Each year the Office of the County Auditor" will" measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculated the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundar ies of the district; or 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. " Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $2,000,000 to $2,600,000 in all present and future phases. It is expected that an estimated $l ,600,000 will be captured as a result of the restaurant and office and industrial building developments. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. -- 2-9 e * These estimates are based on a 40% contribution to the fiscal disparities pool pursuant to Minnesota Statutes , Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, clause (b). (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) e Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Section 273.76 Subdivision I, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the property by the County Assessor in 1984. This assessed value is estimated at $4,900,000. Each year the Office of the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculated the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: I. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundar ies of the district; or 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-order abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment ,financing redevelopment district will annually approximately $2,000,000 to $2,600,000 in all present and future phases. It is expected that an estimated $l, 900,000 will be captured as a result of the restaurant and- office and industrial building developments. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) e Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Section 273.76, Subdivision I, the Adjusted Original Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No. I is estimated at $7,207, 591. This is calculated by adding the current assessed value of the additional parcelsto-.be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. I $2,307,591 to the 2-10 e $4,900,000 Original Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No. I in 1984. Pursuant to, Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated addi tiona1 Captured Assessed Value of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 relating to this modification is approximately $177,657.91. (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) Pursuant to Sections 469.175, subdivision I, and 469.177, subdivision 1, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the Adjusted Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. I is estimated at $816,879. This is calculated by adding the current tax capacity of the additional parcels to be included in Tax Increment Financing District No. I, $59,780, to the $757,099 Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. I. . Since no specific development is anticipated at this time on the additional parcels, there is no additional Captured Tax Capacity within Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 relating to this modification. e Subsection 2.12. Type of Tax Increment Financing District. (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) e The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, Subdivision 10. It has been determined that 59 of the parcels in the district (70 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, utili ties or other improvements and 29 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 31 percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing condi tions as: inadequate street l~yout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to health, safety and general well-being of the community. The 59 structures on the 84 parcels of land constituting the redevelopment district have been investigated by the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Seventeen of the 59 buildings are deteriorated and structurally substandard to a degree requiring clearance and 18 other structures are found to require substantial renovation in order to remove such existing condi tions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, 2-11 e e e excessive 9welling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and general well-being of the community. Thus, the tax increment financing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a redevelopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivision 10. It has been determined that 80 of the parcels in the district (71.4 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, utili ties or other improvements and 35 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 33 percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to heal th, safety and general well-being of the community. The 80 structures on the l12 parcels of land constituting the redevelopment district have been investigated by the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Twenty-eight of the 80 buildings are deteriorated and structurally substandard to a degree requiring clearance and 27 other structures are found to require substantial renovation in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and general well-being of the community. Thus, the tax increment financing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a Tedevelopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B-I. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) It has been found that Tax Increment Financing District No. I qualifies as a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, Subdivision 10(a)(2). Of the 30 addi tional parcels being incorporated into Tax Increment Financing District No. I, Washington County HRA has found that 21 parcels or 70% are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or 2-12 e e e other improvements; that 5 of the 21 parcels or 23.8% contain buildings which are structurally substandard; and that an addi tional 7 of the 21 parcels or 33.3% contain buildings that require substantial renovation or clearance. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment type of tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B-2. Subsection 2 .13. District No. I. Duration of Tax Increment Financing (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision I, the duration of the tax increment district within the Development District must be indicated within the finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment distr ict, incitiding- any modifications to the finance plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision 1, the collection of tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. I may be collected up to 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. The first tax increment was received by the city in 1986. Therefore, the City may collect tax increments generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. I through year 2010. Subsection 2.14. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing (AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED MAY 7, 1985) The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/84 Total $3,600,000 2-13 e Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Bodv: % of District to Total Washington County $ School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, Vo Tech 9l6) 766,928,175 265,063,453 72,818,081 1.2 3.5 12.6 2,740,931,323 .3 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school, city and county districts will have over 82% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by. each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as follows: e All Future Captured Assessed Valuation Phases Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $2,600,000 $278,000* * After contribution to the fiscal disparities pool Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent Tax Increment City 27.832 26% $72,280 County 25.389 24% 66,720 School District 834 48.000 45% 125,100 Other 6.211 05% 13,900 Total 107.432 100.0% $278,000 e The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the elderly housing alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although tne increases in assessed value due to development will not be available 2-14 e for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could eventually permit a ill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jur isdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment School District $265,063,453 .472 $125,100 County $766,928,175 '.087 '$66~720 City $72,818,081 .993 $72,28'0 ' (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) e The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/84 Total $4,900,000 Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, Vo Tech 916) $766,928,175 265,063,453 72,818,081 .639% 1.849% 6.729% 2,740,931,323 .179% e Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school and county districts will have over 98% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by ~each taxing 2-15 e jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as follows: All Future Captured Assessed Valuation Phases Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $3,599,432 $386,694* * After contribution to the fiscal disparities pool Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent Tax Increment. City 27.832 26% $72,280 County 25.389 24% 66,720 School District 834 48.000 45% 125,100 Other 6.211 05% 13,900 Total 107.432 100.0% $278,000 e The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jur isdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Al though the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased to ,raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. Adjusted* Assessed Value Required Mills Tax Increment e School District County City * $260,163,453 $762,028,175 $67,918,081 Tax Increment District assessed .481 .088 1.064 valuation $125,100 $66,720 $72,280 subtracted. 2-16 e (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) The additional estimated impact on other taxing jur isdictions assumes construction would have 'occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District No. I. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred wi thout the assistance of the city, the following estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. I would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: IMPACT OF TAX BASE % of Additional Additional Additional Captured Original Future Captured .Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed Value to Entity Tax Base Value Value Value* Entity Washington County 851,852,556 2,307,591 4,412,931 2,105,340 .247% Stillwater 80,795,336 2,307,591 4;412,931 2,105,340 2.606% S.D. 834 288,278,482 2,307,591 4,412,931 2,105,340 .730% e IMPACT ON MILL RATES Entity Washington County Stillwater S.D. 834 Area Vo-Tech. Other ** Current Mill Rate Additional Potential Taxes Total 26.499 28.850 54.083 1.396 4.767 115.595 $ 55,790 60,739 113,863 2,939 10,036 $243,367 * Does not include fiscal disparities contribution ** Includes Met Transit, Met Council, Hennepin County parks, etc (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) e No specific new development is expected to occur on the addi tional property. At the present time the City does not anticipate capturing any new tax increment from these additional properties, so there is no impact on other taxing jurisdictions under either test required by Section 469.175, subdivision I, of the Tax Increment Financing Act. ~ 2-17 e e e (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) IMPACT ON TAXING JURISDICTIONS DESCH PROJECT ONLY Test No. I: The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would not have occurred without the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. I. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Test No.2: Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the following estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 would be as follows if Test No. I, the "but for" test, was not met: DESCH PROJECT ONLY IMPACT ON TAX BASE* En tit Y Payable 1989 Tax Capacity** Adjusted Original Tax Capacity % of Captured Tax Capacity to Ent ity Future Tax Capacity Captured Tax Capacity Washington County Stillwater 1.S.D. #834 $124,572,273 $ 4,397 11,977,402 4,397 41,116,738 4,397 IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY RATE* Payable 1989 Entity Tax Capaci ty Rat..e. Potential Tax Increment Washington County Stillwater 1.S.D. #834 Area Vo-Tech Misc. (1) 20.931 24.016 49.666 1. 605 3.949 $ Total 100.167 (I) Other taxing entities include Control District, Metropolitan Council, Commission, and Washington County HRA. Metropolitan Mosquito Metropolitan Transit -- 2-18 e *Tax capacities and tax capacity rates payable for 1990 are not available at this time. Impacts reflect the use of payable 1989 figures. **Before fiscal disparities and tax increment calculations. Subsection 2.15. Modification of Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financinq District No. I. (AS MODIFIED OCTOBER I, 1985) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified to reflect a modification of the geographic area of Tax Increment Financing District No. I and increased project costs within Tax Increment Financing District No. I. (AS MODIFIED DECEMBER 12 ~ 1985)' The Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was the geographic area within No . I. Financing Plan for Tax Increment modified to reflect a reduction of Tax Increment Financing District (AS MODIFIED NOVEMBER 3, 1987) e The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 was modified to reflect an enlargement of the geographic area of Tax Increment Financing District No. I and increased project costs within Tax Increment Financing District No. I. e (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I was modified to reflect the implementation of a master project concept within Development District No. I and the modification of the Development Program to reflect increased project costs within the project area, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsections 1.5 and 1.13 of the Development Program. 2-19 e e e (AS MODIFIED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I was modified to reflect an enlargement of the geographic area of Tax Increment Financing District No. I. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) The Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I was modified to reflect increased project costs within Tax Increment Financing District No. I. ~ 2-20 e SECTION III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 (NELLE PROJECT) NOTE: As of February 21, 1989 the City has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing distr icts located wi thin Development Distr ict No. I. Tax Increment Financing District No 3 was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on December 12, 1985. The February 21, 1989 modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan is to implement such a concept. Attached as Exhibit IV-A are portions of the original plan which are not required to be provided in a tax increment financing plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision I, and therefore are not reflected in this Section IV. Subsection 3.1. Statement of Obiecti ves. See. Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 3.2. Development Proqram. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, Subsection l.l through 1.15. Subsection 3.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financinq District No.2. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: e P.I.N.t e 106913800 106913770 106913740 106913720 106912150 106912240 106912300 106912330 I06912780 I06912810 I06912900 106913830 106913860 I06913890 106913920 106913950 106913980 I06913990 I06914010 106914040 3-1 (Block 19) (Block 18) (Block 19) e l06914070 I06914l00 106914130 106914160 106915270 106915300 106915330 106915360 l06915420 l06915450 106915480 106915510 FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 2 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 3.4. Parcels in Acquisition. e Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unheal thful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The identified in Program. Ci ty may Section I, acquire and reconvey the parcels Subsection 1.14 of the Development . The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: (I) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of the tax increment financing plan; and (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 3.5. Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District No.2. e The developer plans to rehabilitate and expand a commercial hotel project (Nelle) within the Development District Modification 2 area. The developer may be assisted with a 3-2 e portion of the land acquisition, public improvement and parking costs associated with the various phases of development through tax increments generated as a result of these developments. The hotel expansions of up to 52 additional units, proposed hotel/motel additions and learning center are further described in Appendix A to Exhibit III-A, Estimate of Tax Increments. Subsection 3.6. Development Activitv Increment Financinq District for which Contract have The following contracts have been entered into by Stillwater and the persons named below: It is expected that the Phase I developments will have executed development contracts no later than the spring of 1986. in the Tax been signed. the Ci ty of (As Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection). Subsection 3.7. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. e As a part of the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelopment district, the other phases of the program may provide for additional public facilities, and land acquisition. Depending on the availability of public funds, the Phase II development should commence within the next two years. (See Appendix "A" to Exhibit III-A for Estimate of Tax Increments.) (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) e Subsection 3.8. Estimated Cost of proiect. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associated with the Development District. Subsection 3.9. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness. An estimate of the amount of bonded indebtedness for all phases is expected to be approximately $3,500,000 based upon all projects in the Nelle project being constructed. The term of the issue is 15 years and the interest rate is 8.5 percent. The amount of maximum capitalized interest is estimated to be $892,500. The amount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount sufficient to pay interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenue to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficulty as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. 3-3 e e e Subsection 3.10. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection 4.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection l.5 of the Development Program. Other sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects in the municipal development district including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and federal funds. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. The commercial development expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1989 at which time the development is estimated' to . gen~rate maximum annual tax increment of $386,694 collectable in 1990. Subsection 3.11. Estimated Original Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision I and Section 273.76, Subdivision I, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the property by the County Assessor in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $1,333,542. Each year the Office of the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: I. change in tax exempt status of property~ 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district~ 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. -~ Pursuant to Minnesota Section 273.74, Statutes, 3-4 e e e Subdivision I and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the maximum estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $3,599,432 in all present and future phases. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. Subsection 3.12. Tvpe of Tax Increment Financing District. The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273. 71-273. 78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a housing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivision 10. It has been determined that 23 of the parcels in the district (71 percent) are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 30 percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding ob buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to health, safety and general well-being of the community. The 23 structures on the 32 parcels of land consti tuting the redevelopment district have been investigated by the Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Five of the 23 buildings are deteriorated and structurally substandard to a degree requir ing clearance and 8 other structures are found to require substantial renovation in order to remove such existing condi tions as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and general well-being of the community. Thus, the tax increment financing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a redevelopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B of Exhibit III-A. Subsection 3.13. District No.2. Duration of Tax Increment Financing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision I, the duration of the tax increment district within the Development District must be indicated within the finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is - 3-5 e e e estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifications to the finance plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. Subsection 3 .14. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/85 $1,133,542 Total Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, VocTech 916) $809,314,635 $294,57l,383 $ 76,125,857 .140 .385 1.49 $2,740,931,323 .041 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school and county districts will have over 99% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates an anticipated tax increment at build out as follows: Maximum Captured Assessed Valuation Maximum Tax Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $3,599,432 $386,694 -- 3-6 '! e Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Maximum Mills Percent Tax Increment City 27.832 26% $100,l79 County 25.389 24% 91,386 School District 834 48.000 45% 172,773 Other 6.211 05% 22,356 Total 107.432 100.0% $386,694 e The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any - of' the' taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing district, this new assessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jur isdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to' be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. Adjusted'll Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment School District $293,437,841 .588 $172,773 County $808,181,093 .113 $91,386 City. $74,992,315 1.34 $100,179 *Tax Increment District assessed valuation subtraeted. Subsection 3.15. Modification of Tax Increment FinancinQ Plan for Tax Increment Financinq District No.2. As of December 12, 1985, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) e Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 is hereby modified to reflect the implementation of the 3-7 e e e master plan concept and increased project costs of Development District No. I as outlined in Section I. Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 and 1.13 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No. l, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing "District No.2 is hereby modified to reflect increased project costs,'as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. 3-8 e e e SECTION IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 (ARKELL PROJECT) NOTE: As of February 21, 1989 the City has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing districts located within Development District No. I. Tax Increment Financing District No 3 was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on December 12, 1985. The February 21, 1989 modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan is to implement such a concept. Attached as Exhibit IV-A are portions of the original plan which are not required to be provided in a tax increment financing plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.17S, Subdivision I, and therefore are not reflected in this Section IV. Subsection 4.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 4.2. Development Program. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No. I, Subsection l.l through 1.IS. Subsection 4.3. . Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financinq District No.3. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: P.I.N.# 90322620 FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 4.4. Parcels in Acquisition. Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utili ties, and facili ties; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. 4-1 e (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The City may acquire and identified in Section I, Subsection Program as modified on June 13, 1988. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: reconvey the parcels 1.14 of the Development (I) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of the tax increment financing plan; and (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 4.5. Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Siqned. The following contracts have been entered into by the City of Stillwater and the persons named below: e It is expected that the Phase I, II and III developments will have executed development contracts no later than the spring of 1986. (As Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection 4.6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financinq District. e As a part of the City's overall revitalization program within the redevelopment district, the other phases of the program may provide for additional public facilities, and land acquisition. Depending on the availability of public funds, the Phase II development should commence within the next two years. Phase II-A is expected to consist of 80 units of elderly housing located on 7,.5 acres and Phase II-B consists of 75 units of two story elderly housing on 6 acres. Phase III-A consists of a shopping/retail facility located on approximately 9 acres and Phase III-B consists of 64 units of elderly housing. The total site size covering all five phases is approximately 35 acres. (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 4.7. Estimated Cost of Project. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associated with the Development District. Subsection 4.8. Indebtedness. Estimated Amount of Bonded 4-2 e e e An estimate of the maximum amount of bonded indebtedness for Phases I, II and III is expected to be $1,200,000. The term of the issue is IS years and the interest rate is expected to be 8.5 percent. The amount of capitalized interest for 3 years is estimated to be $306,000. This estimate is based upon all of the development occurring within the parameters described in Appendix A to Exhibit IV-A. The amount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount sufficient to pay interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenue to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. Subsection 4.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of project (Subsection 4.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. Several other sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects in the m~nicipal development district including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and federal funds as available. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. Phase I of the elderly housing development is expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1988 at which time the development will generate an annual tax increment of $44,200 collectable in 1989. An additional $156,000 per year of tax increment could be available if all of the phases of development are completed. Timing of development phases, lease- up schedules and resulting tab increment cash flow should be calculated and agreed upon between the City and the developer as a part of the redevelopment contract prior to bond issuance. Subsection 4.10. Estimated Oriqinal Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax "Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdi vision 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Or iginal Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the property by the County Assessor in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $12,708. Each year the Office o~ the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district 4-3 e e e to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the maximum estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $411,612 to $1,863,582 in all present and future phases. It is expected that an estimated $411,612 will be captured as a result of Phase I. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. Subsection 4.11. Tvpe of Tax Increment Financing District. Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 is, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a) (2), a redevelopment district as defined below: The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a housing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivision 11. The tax increment financing district consists of a project, a portion of which is intended for occupancy by persons or families of low and moderate income as defined in Chapter 462A and other state and federal legislation in connection with the issuance of 462C housing bonds. Thus, the tax increment financing district meets the statutory requirements of a housing district. Subsection 4.12. District No.3. Duration of Tax Increment Financina Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision I, the duration of the tax increment district within 4-4 e e e the Development District must be indicated within the finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifications to the finance plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. Subsection 4.13. Jurisdictions. Estimated Im?act on Other Taxina The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/85 Total $12,708 Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, VocTech 916) $809,314,635 $294,571,383 $76,125,857 .002 .004 .017 $2,740,931,323 .0005 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that the school and county districts will have over 99% of each respective district available for normal growth of tax base or valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jurisdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax,dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as follows: Phase Estimated Assessed Valuation I Estimated Increment Received Tax Increment Finance District $411,612 $44,200 4-5 e e e All Estimated Assessed Valuation Phase Estimated Increment Received $1,863,582 $200,200 Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent City 27.832 26% County 25.389 24% School District 834 48.000 45% Other 6.211 05% Total 107.432 100.0% Maximum Tax Increment $51,865 47,313 89,448 11,574 $200,200 The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment district would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing distr ict, this new assessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jur isdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing district would have to be increased to raise the same ainount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment School District $294,558,675 .304 $89,448 County $809,301,927 .058 $47,313 City $76,113,149 .681 $51,865 *Tax Increment District assessed valuation subtracted. Subsection 4.14. Modification of Tax Increment FinancinQ Plan for Tax Increment FinancinQ District No.3. As of December 12, 1985, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. 4-6 e e e (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 is hereby modified to reflect the implementation of the master plan concept and increased project costs of Development Distr ict No. 1 as outlined in Section I. Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 and 1.13 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED March 20, 1990) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 is hereby modified to reflect increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. 4-7 e SECTION V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 4 NOTE: As of February 21, 1989 the City has determined to implement a master project concept in regard to tax increment financing districts located wi thin Development Distr ict No I. Tax Increment Financing District No 4 was established and its Tax Increment Financing Plan was approved on April I, 1986. The February 21, 1989 modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan is to implement such a concept. Attached as Exhibit V-A are portions of the original plan which are not required to be provided in a tax increment financing plan p~rsuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1, and therefore are not reflected in this Section V. e Subsection 5.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development Distrlc.t No.. 1, Subsection 1.4, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 5.2. Development ProQram. See Section I, Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, Subsection 1.1 through 1.15. Subsection 5.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment FinancinQ District No.4. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: P.I.N. Owner 90322610 90322612 Croixgate Land Co. Croixgate Land Co. FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 3 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 5.4. Parcels in Acquisition. Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. e -~ 5-1 e (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) The identified in Program. Ci ty may Section I, acquire and Subsection reconvey the parcels 1.14 of the Development The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: (1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of the tax increment financing plan; and (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. e Subsection 5.5. Development Activity in the Tax Increment Financing District for which Contracts have been Sianed. The following contracts have been entered into by the City of Stillwater and the persons named below: It is expected that the Woodland Lakes Development will have executed development contracts no later than the summer of 1986. (AS Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection 5.6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur within the Tax Increment Financing District. The developer plans to construct a 360,000 square foot shopping mall, a 150 room hotel, a 13,000 square foot banking facility, and 84,300 square feet of office and retail space. The developer may be assisted with a portion of the land acquisition, site improvements, and parking costs associated with the various phases of development through tax increments generated as a result of ,these developments. The proposed development is further described in Appendix A of Exhibit V-A, Estimate of Tax Increment. e (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 5.7. Estimated Cost of Project. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associated with the Development District. Subsection 5.8. Estimated aunt of Bonded Indebtedness. An estimate of the maximum amount -~ of bonded indebtedness, using 60% of the tax increment, is expected to be 5-2 e e e $3,711,020 based on all projects in the Woodland Lakes development being constructed. The term of the issue is 16 years and the interest rate of 7 percent is based upon a tax exempt bond. Due to pending federal legislation. the bonds may be taxable and the interest rate may be higher. The amount of capi talized interest years is estimated to be $997,720. The amount of capitalized interest will be equal to an amount sufficient to pay interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date of collection of sufficient tax increment revenue to meet scheduled interest payments when due, but not exceeding 3 years as required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. Predicting capitalized interest prior to issuance is extremely difficult as it is a function of interest rates, construction schedules and tax timing; therefore, the above figure is only an estimate of capitalized interest and is subject to change. Excess increment may be used to issue futuie bon~s ~i to pay additional costs for improvements in the municipal development district. Subsection 5.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection 5.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 3 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. Several other sources of revenue may be used to finance public costs associated with the development projects in the municipal development district including industrial revenue bonds, and other state and federal funds. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in assessed valuation and the property taxes attributed to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. The commercial development is expected to be fully assessed beginning in 1991 at which time the development is estimated to generate maximum annual tax increment of $1,144,800 collectable in 1992 (PLAN A). Subsection 5.10. Oriainal Assessed Value and Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Estimate of Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Section 273.76, Subdivision I, the Original Assessed Value (OAV) for the City of Stillwater tax increment financing redevelopment district is based on the value placed on the property by the County Assessor in 1985. This assessed value is estimated at $60,650. Each year the Office of the County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decfease in the total assessed value of the tax increment redevelopment district 5-3 e e e to calculate the tax increment payable to the Stillwater redevelopment district fund. In any year in which there is an increase in total assessed valuation in the tax increment redevelopment district above the adjusted original assessed value, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total assessed valuation in the tax increment financing redevelopment district declines below the original assessed valuation, no assessed valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the Original Assessed Value was certified, the amount the OAV has increased or decreased as a result of: I. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, Subdivision 1 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Assessed Value (CAV) of the tax increment financing redevelopment district will annually approximate $10,062,715 in all present and future phases. This amount will be captured for up to twenty-five years or until the project debt is retired. Subsection 5.11. Type of Tax Increment FinancinQ District. The City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, in determining the need for a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78 inclusive, finds that the district to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.73, Subdivision lOCal (3). Less than 70 percent of the parcels in ,the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but due to unusual terrain, or soil deficiencies requiring substantial filling, grading or other physical preparation for use at least 80 percent of the total acreage .of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the redevelopment district which, when added to the estimated cost of preparing that land for development, excluding costs directly related to roads as defined in section 160.01 and local improvements as described in section 429.021, subdivision 1, clauses 1 to 7, 11, and l2, and section 420.01, if any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of said preparation. No parcel shall be included wi thin a redevelopment district pursuant to this paragraph unless the authority has 5-4 e e e concluded an agreement or agreements for the development of at least 50 percent of the acreage having the unusual soil or terrain deficiencies, which agreement provides recourse for the authority should the development not be completed. Development agreements will be executed prior to the approval of the Tax Increment Finance District Plan. Thus, the tax increment financing district appears to meet the statutory requirements of a redevelopment district and will henceforth be referred to as a redevelopment tax increment financing district. The parcels that have been used to establish eligibility as a redevelopment tax increment financing district have been listed in Appendix B of Exhibit V-A. Subsection 5.12. District No.4. Duration of Tax Increment Financing Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.75, Subdivision 1, the duration of the tax increment district ~ithin the Development District must be indicated within the. finance plan. The duration of the tax increment district will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Thus, it is estimated that the tax increment district, including any modifications to the finance pIan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate in year 2012. Subsection 5.13. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing The impact of the loss of tax dollars represented as tax increments is estimated below for each taxing jurisdiction. This estimate is based on the existing redevelopment proposals and does not include the possible tax increments derived from any other future development, mill changes, or inflation factors. Total Assessed Value Tax Increment Finance District 1/2/85 Total $60,650 Latest Assessed Value of Each Government Body: % of District to Total Washington County School District 834 City of Stillwater Other (Metro Transit, Metro Council, Mosquito Control, VocTech #916) $809,314,635 $294,571,383 $76,l25,857 .007 .021 .080 $2,740,931,323 .002 Considering all the districts, it can be seen from the above that each respective district will have over~99% of each respective district available for normal .growth of tax base or 5-5 e valuation. Applying the percentage of the total mill rate in 1985 levied by each taxing jur isdiction to the projected mill rate and the estimated tax increment received reveals the annual loss of tax dollars by each taxing jurisdiction as listed in the table below assuming development would occur without public assistance. The finance plan indicates we anticipate a tax increment at build out as follows: Maximum ' Captured Assessed Valuation Tax Increment Finance District $10,062,715 Maximum Tax Increment Received $1,144,800 Based on the current mill rate, the estimated taxes received would be as follows for the taxing bodies: Mills Percent City 28.801 25% County 27.586 24% e School District #834 50.548 44% Other 6.880 06% Total Il3.8l5 100.0% Maximum Tax Increment $289,693 277,472 508,433 69,202 $1,144,800 The following table represents the additional mills that would have to be levied to compensate for the loss of tax dollars in estimated tax increments for each taxing jurisdiction. The tax increments derived from the development alluded to in the tax increment distr ict would not be available to any of the taxing jurisdictions were it not for public intervention by the City. Although the increases in assessed value due to development will not be available for the application of the mill levy for the duration of the tax increment financing distric,t, this new assessed value could eventually permit a mill levy decrease. If it could be assumed that the captured assessed value was available for each taxing jurisdiction, the non-receipt of tax dollars represented as tax increments may be determined. This determination is facilitated by estimating how much the mill levy for property outside of the tax increment financing distr ict would have to be increased to raise the same amount of tax dollars in each taxing jurisdiction that would be available if the projects occurred without the assistance of the City. e 5-6 e e e School District County City Adjusted* Required Tax Assessed Value Mills Increment $294,510,733 1.730 $508,433 $809,253,985 .343 $227,472 $76,065,207 3.810 $289,693 *Tax Increment District assessed valuation subtracted. Subsection 5.14. Modification of Tax Increment Financina Plan for Tax Increment Financinq District No.4. As of April 6, 1985, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. (AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 21, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 is hereby modified to reflect the implementation of the master plan concept and increased project costs of Development District No. I as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 1989) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 is hereby modified to reflect an enlargement of the Project Area and increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsections 1.5 and 1.l3 of the Modified Development Program. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 4 is hereby modified to reflect increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsection 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. .- 5-7 e SECTION VI. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 Project Summary The tax increment revenues generated through new development in Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 (Brick Pond Project) will be used to enhance the quality of public improvements and to reduce the extraordinary utility improvement costs caused by an inappropriate subdivision pattern and incompatible land uses. The Brick Pond Planning Area contains land-locked parcels (no street access) and commercial and multifamily residential development next to a stable, single family neighborhood. e Tax increment revenues can be used to reduce utility improvement costs in line with other competitive sites' in. the area. This will increase the likelihood for the area to develop. The need for a neighborhood park and greenbelt buffer was identified in the Comprehensive Plan for the area. Tax increment revenues will be used to purchase land for the park and make park improvements and to establish a landscape buffer between incompatible land uses. Remaining tax increment revenues will be used to upgrade and rehabilitate downtown Stillwater. Subsection 6.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Sec- tion I, Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, Subsection l.4, Statement of Objectives. Subsection 6.2. Development Proaram. Modified Development Program for Development Subsection 1.1 through 1.15. Subsection 6.3. Parcels to be Included in Tax Increment Financing District No.5. The following parcels located in the City of Stillwater, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: See Section I, District NO.1, P.I.N. Owner 9033-2360 9033-2115 9033-2120 9033-2140 9033-2356 9033-2357 9033-2354 Stillwater I.S.D. NO. 834 Robert Brackey Robert Brackey Rose Floral Augustine Bros. Augustine Bros. Mexicale e FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. Subsection 6.4. Parcels in Acquisition.---' Properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City in order 6-1 It - - to accomplish one or more of the following: remove, prevent, or reduce blight, blighting factors, causes of blight, or the spread of blight and deterioration; to eliminate unhealthful, unsafe, and unsanitary structures and conditions; reduce traffic hazards; provide land for needed public streets, utilities, and facilities; remove incompatible land use, eliminate obsolete or detrimental uses; assemble land for redevelopment; carry out clearance and/or redevelopment to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The City may acquire and reconvey the parcels identified in Section I, Subsection 1.14 of the Development Program. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date: (1) The City may acquire property by condemnation or direct purchase from order to achieve the objectives of financing plan; and gift, dedication, willing. sell.ers in the tax increment (2) Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 6.5. Development Activity in the Tax Incre- ment Financina District for which Contracts have been Signed. The following contracts have been entered into by the City of Stillwater and the persons named below: (As Contracts are entered into with the City of Stillwater, they will be inserted in this Subsection.) Subsection 6.6. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur wi thin the Tax Increment Financing District. The City anticipates that the following development will occur within Tax Increment Financing District No.5: (1) construction and equipping of an 8l-unit multifamily housing facility; (2) construction and equipping of a 20-unit duplex residential facility; and (3) construction of an auto service center. (As other specific development is expected to occur, it will be inserted into this Subsection.) Subsection 6.7. Estimated Cost of Proiect. See Sub- section 1.5 of the Development Program for estimated costs associ- ated with the Development District. 6-2 e e e Subsection 6.8. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebted- ness. It is anticipated that bonded indebtedness may be incurred in an amount so that $616,000 in net proceeds will be available with respect to this portion of Development District No.1. Subsection 6.9. Sources of Revenue. Public improvement costs, acquisition costs and other costs outlined in the Estimated Cost of Project (Subsection 5.7 above) will be financed through the annual collection of tax increments as described below. It is anticipated that the City will retain all tax increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 to pay for costs outlined in Subsection 1.5 of the Development Program. Subsection 6.10. Original Tax Ca?acitv: Estimated Captured Tax Capaci tv. Pursuant to Section 469 .l77, Subd. 1 of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the original tax capacity for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 is estimated to be $109,804 for the year 1988 payable 1989, based on the tax capacity of all taxable real property within Tax Increment Financing District No. 5. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 4, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the County Auditor of Washington County (the "County Auditor") shall certify in each year the amount by which the original tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result in a change in tax-exempt property within Tax Increment Financing District No.5, reduction or enlargement of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 or changes in connection with previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 declines below the original tax capacity, no tax capacity will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the City. Pursuant to Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.177, Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Financing Act, the estimated captured tax capacity in Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 at completion, 1991 payable 1992, will be approximately $328,622. This estimated annual captured tax capacity value is determined in the following manner: Estimated Tax Capacity at Completion, 1991/1992 $479,200 Original Tax Capacity* Captured Tax Capacity *Adjusted for inflation. See Exhibi t VI-C for the annual adjustment to the original tax capacity of Tax Increment Financing District No.5. 150,578 $328,622 Subsection 6.11. Tvpe of Tax Increment Financina Dis- tr ict. Tax Increment Financing Distr ict No. 5 is, pursuant to Section 469.174, Subdivision 12, an economic development type of district as defined below: 6-3 e "Economic development district" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of any project, or portions of a project, not meeting the requirements found in the definition of redevelopment district, mined underground space development district or housing district, but which the authority finds to be in the public interest because: (1) it will discourage commerce, manufacturing from moving their another state; or industry operations of to (2) it will result in increased employment in the municipality; or (3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. Subsection 6.12. Duration of Tax Increment 'Financing District No.5. In accordance with Section 469.176, Subdivision 1, of Tax Increment Financing Act, the City, with this economic development district, may collect tax increment payments over a period of time ending eight (8) years from the date of the receipt of the first increment, or ten (10) years from approval of the tax increment financing plan, whichever is less. e The City will approve the Tax Increment Financing Plan on June 20, 1989. Therefore one defined termination date after which tax increment income cannot be received will be June 20, 1999. NO current development on properties wi thin Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 will have taken place by January 2, 1990, the date on which the properties wi thin the district were reassessed for tax purposes. Therefore any increase in taxable assessed value over the original assessed value would be caused only by an inflation value on undeveloped properties. Any captured value created by an inflationary value' would produce an insignificant tax increment for collection in 1991. The City does not wish to accept any tax increment in 1991 and wishes to pass through any such increment which might be receivable to all other taxing jurisdictions within the district which would collect such increment in the same proportion as before establishment of the district. e If the City, through the tax increment district, is not paid any tax increment in 1991, then the first possible receipt would be in May, 1992, from any value captured based on assessor's reevaluation of the property on January 2, 1991. Under the second defined termination ate, eight years from May, 1991 would be May, 2000. Since the June 20, 1999 limitation is less than the period ending May, 2000, it is assumed in the finance plan that no 6-4 e tax increments will be received after the final property tax settlement in 1999. Subsection 6.13. Jurisdictions. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Test No. l: The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assume construction would have occurred without the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No.5. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Test No.2: Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the financing would not have occurred without the assistance of the City, the following estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 would be a~ follows if Test NO.. 1 (the_ "but for" test) was not met: .. IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY Original* Future Captured District 1988 Total** Tax Tax Tax % of Entity Tax Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Entity e Washington County $124,572,273 $150,578 $479,200 $328,622 0.264% Stillwater 11,977,402 150,578 479,200 328,622 2.744 I.S.D. #834 41,116,738 150,578 479,200 328,622 0.799 * Adjusted for Inflation ** Before Fiscal Disparities IMPACT ON TAXES Entity 1988/89 Tax Capacity Rate Potential Taxes Washington County Stillwater I.S.D. 1834 Other (1) 20.931 24.016 49.666 5.554 100.167 $ 68,784 78,922 163,213 18,252 $329,171 (1) Other taxing jurisdictions include AVTI, Metropolitan Mosquito Control District, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Transit Commission, HRA, RTB, and Watershed District. e Subsection 6.14. Tax Increment Financina Account for Tax Increment Financina District No.5. The tax increment recei ved with respect to Tax Increment Financing Distr ict No. 5 will be segregated by the City in a special account or accounts on its official books and records. 6-5 e e e , Subsection 6.15. Modification of Tax Increment Financ- ing Plan for Tax Increment Financina District No.5. As of June 20, 1989, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor have been made. (AS MODIFIED MARCH 20, 1990) Pursuant to the adoption of the modification of the Modified Development Program for Development District No.1, the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 is hereby modified to reflect increased project costs, as outlined in Section I, Subsections 1.5 of the Modified Development Program. 6-6 @ ~ ~(~(r6 e January 11, 1990 Mr. Nile Kriesel Stillwater City Administrator 216 N. Fourth St. Stillwater, MN. 55082 Dear Nile: I have a couple of trivial questions for you and one comment: e 1. Why is the street between River Heights Plaza and Norwest Bank called Northwestern Ave.? It would seem to make more sense if it was called SO!lthwestern Ave. being that it is geographically in thet part of Stillwater. 2. Why is it that the only City of Stillwater City Limits signs are located on Highway 95? It would seem just as important to me that they should also be located on C.S.A.H. 5, C.S.A.H. 12, and C.S.A.H. 64. You know as w211 as I do that many travelers and tourists enter Stillwater via the County Highways and them knowing where the city limits are would be helpful. It would also be a safety factor, particularly on C.S.A.H. 12 (Myrtle St.) where traffic really flies even beyond Brick St. into the City. My personal feeling is that erecting "Entering City of Stillwater, Speed Limit Laws Enforced" would mean safer streets for all. My comment would be relative to the Oak Glen Golf Course and Clubhouse. I think it would be much more appropriate for the City of consider buying out the property from David Johnson than the County. Still\13ter is the entity to ~hich he o~es the most money. Stillwater could much better manage the course because it doesn't have its tentacles in many other aspects of parks and open space like the County does. I hope the City has the chance to consider it. Thanks.. e r ~ ~ ~ ~ WASIIINGl'ON COUNrry ASSESSOR'S OFFICE GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 . STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082.0006 612/779.5403 Fax machine: 612/779.5498 J. Scott Renne, MAl, CAE County Assessor 779.5136 Dennis Montague, CMA Assistant County Assessor 779-5137 Judith M. Ellis, CMA Administrative Technician 779-5465 Date: January 10, 1990 To: Washington County City and Township Clerks From: J. Scott Renne, Washington County Assessor Subject: 1990 Local Boards of Review e Enclosed is the final notification and posting notices for your 1990 Local Board of Review. Valuation notices will be mailed at least ten days prior to the Board. The Local Board has the responsibility of reviewing the January 2, 1990 valuation and classification of the property. If a property owner has concerns about their payable 1990 property taxes they must deal directly with the Assessor's ~ffice or go to Tax Court. The Local Board of Review does not have jurisdiction over the current property taxes. Local Boards must have a quorum of the members present at the meeting in order to comply with State Law. An information packet about the 1990 assessment and specific responsibilities of Local Boards will be sent to you in about a month. If you have any questions call me at 779-5136 or Judy Ellis at 779-5465 JSR/ss e .J- Washington County does not di5crirnirmte 011 the basis of racl), color, national origin, sex, religion, age ar.d handicapped status in employment or the provision of services. Form No. A.F. 4-Notice to Clerk of Meeting of Board of Review-OEqualizatlon. *** BLANK P~~~l~P~~:\ OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR TO THE CLERK OF THE City OF Stillwater Washington COUNTY, MINNESOTA: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the 24th day of April at 3: 00 o'clocL.!:..M., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Review-~ftt\ttht (Strike out one) -in your City for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.1, you are required to give notice of said meeting by publication and posting, not later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting. " Given under my hand this 26 :~:- January.,- .c_.. 1990 .......~, . ~ r .--".- "." ~.I>_...". . . ~. iL{J \ \ i"~\<' /\ ;, ~ ~",......,.vJ "~J County Assessor Washington County, Minnesota · Applies only to cities whose charter provides for a Board of Equalization instead of a Board of Review. e e e e ~ illwater ~ - - ~ ---- -i'- THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CHARTER COMMISSION MEMBERS JACK EVERT, CHAIRMAN FEBRUARY 1, 1990 MEETING AGENDA The next meeting of the Charter Commission will be held on Thursday, February 15, 1990 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers. The items for discussion will be: To finalize the campaign financial disclosure change, and The next activities regarding the Ward proposal change. ~ -~ . CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 e STILLWATER PUBLIC LIBRARY 223 NORfH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES JANUARY 8, 1990 The regular monthly meeting of the Stillwater Public Library Board of Trustees was held on Monday, January 8, 1990. PRESENT: Hansen, Doe, Engebretson, Childs, Cass, Bertalmio. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 P.M. by President Hansen. The Board moved to: Adopt the agenda as published. Approve the minute~ as published. Approve payment of bills in the amount $3,087.74. e There were no communications. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. Administration - presented report on Union contract, 1990 Board goals, Board Calendar and job description for new circulation desk position. 2. Budget & Finance - the Budget was adopted on December 5,1989. 3. Building & Grounds - none. 4. Goals - The committee will meet during the coming month. 5. Public Relations - ideas were presented for a library logo and slogans. 6. Special Projects - presented report on Christmas activities, noted new display in glass case. 7. WCL Liaison Report - Schmidt reported on the December 12, 1989 WCL Board meeting. e OLD BUSINESS 1. Video Cassette Loan Policy - The matter was referred to the Administration Committee for recommendation before the next Board meeting. 2. Video Viewing Policy - The committee will meet before February. 3. Adult Programming - referred to committee. 4. Margaret Rivers Foundation Grant - The Library has received $5,000 from the Foundation. The matter was referred to the Public Relations Committee. MINUTES - Page 2 NEW BUSINESS 1. Board Cal 2. 1990 Boar 3. Director' 4. Lead Circ Classific PRESIDENT'S hosting the e ndar - Adopted as published. Goals - Adopted as published. Goals - Adopted as published. lation Worker - Job Description tion - adopted. and T - included a thank you to the Director for /Staff Christmas Event. The Director's R port and Staff Reports were distributed. Adjournment: mov d/seconded/passed 8:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Jane Dickinson Cass Recording Secretary e tit League of Minnesota Cities February 1, 1990 Mr. David C. Junker Public Works Director City of stillwater 216 North 4th street Stillwater, MN 55082 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986) Mr. Nile Kriesel Coordinator City of stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Gentlemen: RE: Kalinoff v. stillwater v. Monson Enclosed with this letter are copies of a letter to Doug Gronli of GAB, a letter to Plaintiff's attorney and a copy of the Release that will be signed by Plaintiff. As we discussed on the telephone on January 19, 1990, this appears to be an appropriate settlement of this matter. e I sincerely appreciate your assistance and cooperation in the defense of this lawsuit. I know that without your assistance and cooperation we would not have been able to obtain such a favorable result. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this settlement, please do not hesitate to calI. Sincerely (, :OHN E. HENNEN CIT Staff Attorney cc: David T. Magnuson, City Attorney -- ,,~~ \'" <6 ~'Y,~' ~) League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600 (FAX: 221-0986) e January 22, 1990 Mr. Doug Gronli GAB BUSINESS SERVICES P.O. Box 7007 380 Layfayette Freewa Rd. st. Paul, MN 55107 Dear Doug: RE: Kalinoff v. cit of stillwater v. Monson GAB File No. 56 42-05967 The above-entitled ma Third-Party Defendant $6,000. Please make attorney Albert E. Ra draft directly to me, together with our ReI ter settled for a total of $18,000. The will pay $12,000, we're responsible for draft payable to Vacil Kalinoff and his urn in the amount of $6,000. Please send the I will then forward it on to attorney Ranum, ase. e Attorney Geck indicat s that she will prepare a Stipulation of Dismissal with prejud'ce and send that to Plaintiff's attorney for his signature. we receive a signed Release and a signed copy of the Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, this file may be closed with no need f r any further action by any of the partles. JEH:gmg cc: David T. Magnuso Bob Weisbrod - N Dennls Werner - GAB No. 56542-0 , Stillwater RS AS st. Paul 967 Clty Attorney e 183 University Ave. E., St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 DATE: February 2, 1990 TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks FROM: Don Slater, LMC Executive Director RE: Tax Increment Financing -- Legislature is Intent on Making Major Changes in the Law THE CURRENT SITUATION REGARDING TIF e There is a clear and present danger that the Legislature will take action to restrict tax increment financing during the session that begins on February 12, 1990. The new chairman of the House Tax Committee, Rep. Paul Ogren, has directed Rep. Ann Rest to prepare an extremely restrictive tax increment bill. Rep. Ogren has publicly announced his desire to consider tax increment legislation during the 1990 session, even though studies of TIF by the Legislative Auditor and the Finance Department will not be completed until after the session ends. Senator Ember Reichgott is preparing to introduce a bill that will severely restrict cities' ability to use tax increment financing. She claims to have support from Perpich administration officials, county commissioners, and influential legislators. Others known to be seeking more restrictive TIF legislation include the School Boards Association, the Minnesota Business Partnership and the citizens' League. We aren't sure whether these formidable forces can be stymied in the Legislature this time. The League is working with the Minnesota chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) and trying to form a broad coalition of all parties interested in preserving tax increment financing. - over WHAT CAN YOU DO? e Personal Contact Contact your legislat rs, particularly your members of the House, and let them know tha further interference with TIF will impair your ability to devel p and redevelop your city. - Urge them not to at empt to unravel TIF in this session. We need time to study e effect of the major changes they made in 1988 and 1989. - Remind them that ena ting changes before the studies by the Legislative Auditor and the Department of Finance are published in the summer of 1990 will make these studies less valuable. - Urge them to design statewide economic development policy before focusing on t e tools of economic development. abor unions, and members of your chamber of r legislators and tell them the importance conomic development and redevelopment in Urge Others to Contact Legislators Ask local developers, commerce to contact yo of preserving TIF for your city. At this time, the best thinking we can assemble is the following: 1. Recognize that the state needs a state-wide redevelopment and economic developme t plan; e 2. Recognize several urrent ongoing studies of TIF; and 3. Suggest that TIF b evaluated as a tool to implement a state plan and not restr'cted before we have an adequate general plan. -