HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-24 CC Packet Special Meeting
Cj3. f./ ,
~illyv<!te~
";;;""".,, "' '''''''~
e
November 24, 1993
MEMO
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: MARY LOU JOHNSON, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING, TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 30.1993.4:30 &
7:00 P.M.
This memo is a reminder to Council that a Special Meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday
afternoon at 4:30 and 7:00 P.M. in the Stillwater City Hall Council Chambers, 216 No. 4th
e St., Stillwater, Mn. to discuss the following:
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
1. Possible award of bid for West Jr. H.S. Parking Lot.
2. Efficiency Study Workshop.
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
1. This is the day and time for the 1994 "Truth in Taxation" Public Hearing and
proposed 1994 Budget.
Notice of the hearing was published in the The Gazette on November 24, 1993.
2. Discussion of Animal Shelter Contract.
3. Any other business Council may wish to discuss.
a
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
TENNESSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Industrial/ Management Consultants
612-729-0595
3200 EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
e
June 15, 1993
Mayor Charles M. Hooley
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55982 . 71
Dear Mayor Hooley: P ~
Basic Letter of Agreement to provide Efficiency Study for City of Stillwater
Tennessen Associates, Inc. (Consultant) agrees to provide services to City of Stillwater (Client)
based upon the following basic services, further defined in the submitted proposal (Exhibit A),
and the following stipulations:
e BASIC SERVICES
2.
e
1.
Review Project Parameters
Review City Plans
3.
Provide Process Orientation Training',
~
Document Current Processes
4.
5.
Develop Improved Processes
6.
Prepare Process Narratives
7.
Document Employee and Facility Support Requirements
8.
Document Workshop Space
9.
Document Throughput Requirements
1
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELP YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
to. Approve Space'Requirements e
11. Develop Relati nship Chart
12.
13. Develop Final eport
COMPENSATION
A.
Total Expense
f ~{k II
ices and Reimbursable Expenses, as defined in following
B. Basic Services
For management planping services rendered, consultant will be compensat on ee
schedule based upon rk effort expended. Estimated cost for Basic Service is $7,435.
C.
e
Reimbursement expen es include actual expenditures for the project, such as cost of
reproduction of docu . ents, postage, automobile travel . {mile, long distance
telephone calls, meals and lodging, data processing fft er pe es as authorized by
the client. Estimated ost for Reimbursable Expe es is $1,163.
D. Billable Hourly Rates
Principal Consultant
Systems Analyst
Project Leader
Project Analyst
Data Processing Oper tor
Computer Processing
$75.00/hour
$55.00/hour
$55.00/hour
$40.00/hour
$35.00/hour
$15.00/hour
2
e
~1ESSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Industrial! Management Consultants
612-729-0595
.JO EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
e
Invoice submitted to:
Nile Kriesel
city of stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
stillwater MN 55082
EAf(
INVOICE No.
9322-02-01
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
~ June 30, 1993
-= 7592 F r:W,
In reference to: Phase II - Public Works Department
Consultant
Project Analyst
For professional services rendered
Reimbursable expenses:
Data Process
Mileage
Total costs
Total amount of this bill
e
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELP YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
Hrs/Rate
28.00
75.00jhr
1.50
35.00jhr
Amount
2,100.00
52.50
29.50 $2,152.50
22.50
16.80
$39.30
$2,191. 80
0 (L
---
(0 {~v1
10
. 'J
r,.b
.""""
{\.. -.
~
I
I
~NNESSEN ASSOtIATES, INC.
Industrial/ Management Consultants
J200 EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, I^N 55417
612-729-0595
e
Invoice submitted to:
Nile Kriesel
city of stillwater
city Hall
216 North Fourth street
stillwater MN 55082
July 30, 1993
INVOICE No.
9322-02-02
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
In reference to: Fhase II - Public Works Department
Hrs/Rate
Amount
Consultant
63.00
75.00jhr
4,725.00
Project Analyst
18.50
35.00jhr
6.75
35.00jhr
647.50
Word Processor
236.25
e
For professional servicEs rendered
Reimbursable expenses:
88.25
$5,608.75
Data Process
Meals
Mileage
Reproductions
232.50
7.14
96.32
8.20
Total costs
$344.16
Total amount of this bi I
$5,952.91
I.D~
- I . L -
I ~'U.,.I
rr.1\
~~~ e
0'"
~
vr
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELF YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
lENNESSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Industrial! Management Consultants
3200 EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
612-729-0595
e
Invoice submitted to:
Nile Kriesel
City of stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth street
stillwater MN 55082
INVOICE No.
August 31, 1993
9322-02-03
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
In reference to: Phase II - Public Works Department
Hrs/Rate
Amount
Consultant
28.00 2,100.00
75.00jhr
12.50 437.50
35.00jhr
Project Analyst
Word Processor
3.75 131.25
35.00jhr
For professional services rendered
Reimbursable expenses:
44.25 $2,668.75
Data Process
Mileage
165.00
67.20
Total costs
$232.20
Total amount of this bill
$2,900.95
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELP YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
"',
TENNESSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Industrial/ Management Consultants
i
3200 EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, ~N 55417
I
I
612-729-0595
e
Invoice submitted to:
Nile Kriesel
city of stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth street
stillwater MN 55082
september 30, 1993
INVOICE No.
9322-02-04
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
In reference to: ~hase II - Public Works Department
Hrs/Rate
Amount
Consultant
19.50
75.00jhr
1,462.50
Project Analyst
4.50
35.00jhr
157.50
Word Processor
5.75
35.00jhr
201. 25
e
For professional serviC~S rendered
Reimbursable expenses:
.
29.75
$1,821.25
Data Process
Meals
Mileage
Postage
Reproductions
86.25
6.60
38.64
6.09
35.15
Total costs
$172.73
Total amount of this bill
$1,993.98
e
'?J?3
""7 \",
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELP YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
....c i;,
'.\~r'
TENNESSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Industrial/ Management Consultants
3200 EAST 51st STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
612-729-0595
e
Invoice submitted to:
Nile Kriesel
City of stillwater
city Hall
216 North Fourth street
stillwater MN 55082
INVOICE No.
October 31, 1993
9322-02-05
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
In reference to: Phase II - Public Works Department
Hrs/Rate
Amount
Project Analyst
7.00
35.00jhr
245.00
Word Processor
0.75
35.00jhr
26.25
For professional services rendered
Reimbursable expenses:
7.75
$271.25
Data Process
Postage
Reproductions
90.00
3.19
4.50
Total costs
$97.69
Total amount of this bill
$368.94
()
i/'
ss?:;.
.~, 2'1""'
\S~l
\
EFFECTIVE PLANNING TO HELP YOUR BUSINESS PROFIT
e
e
e
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: City Coordinator
DA: November 9, 1993 .f1...e.-'-~Jfrr/V\~f
RE: EFFICIENCY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
/) (~3o!q"3
Accompanying this memo are the following items:
Phase I - Administration Efficiency Study
Phase II - Public Works Efficiency Study
Proposed Phase I and II implementation Plan
Proposed Building Modification Plans
Although the written part of the study has been completed, the report also
includes a somewhat detailed layout (drawing) of proposed changes to the
municipal building which took several meetings to complete. The proposed
changes were made under the assumption that the present building would be
modified to accommodate present city departments/staff. The modifications
involve all levels/offices of city hall (except the fire department) and
includes the conversion of the lower level (basement) to office space for
the police department.
I believe there is a consensus among staff that the modifications could be
a workable solution to the over crowdedness and inadequate organization of
the present office space. However, it will be necessary to present the
proposed layout to a professional architectural firm to develop final plans
for the modification. At this time, questions remain unanswered regarding
the use of the lower level and what must be done to comply with state laws,
specifically ADA requirements (elevator or ramps to accommodate handicap
access) and building codes (sprinklers, exiting, lighting, etc) .
Obviously, the building could be modified to comply with any or all laws.
It is just a questions of whether or not the cost of doing so is economically
feasible and whether there are less costly alternatives - such as building
"up" rather than building "down" or building a new building to separately
house some of the departments (Le., a new public safety building for police
and fire and/or expanding the city garage).
Further, many of the recommendations made by Mr. Tennessen assume that the
building must be modified before it is practical to implement the
recommendations. For example, one recommendation is to create a
receptionist station in the main (admin) office area. Staff agrees with
this recommendation and propose that Sue Stickan, Junior Account Clerk, be
assigned this duty while also retaining most of her present duties, which
includes being the main telephone operator for City Hall and doing the
utility billings. In order to allow Sue to perform the activities
pertaining to the utility billing function and to handle "over the counter"
business, it is suggested that an automated telephone service be purchased.
An automated telephone service would basically instruct a caller on how to
,
contact the individual I 01' department Q-::ing ea1led without having the
receptionist actually ansfier the phone. However, the actual phone system
will depend to some ext~nt on how t..'1e building is actually laid out. In any
event, it would appear I to be prudent to determine the overall telephone
needs of the offices hous d at City Hall before a new system is purchased and
it will be necessary to establish how the building is organized before any
final decisions can be ade on implementing many of the recommendations.
This will be noted everal times!!! ) on the Proposed Implementation
Schedule.
I don't know how Council discussion will be necessary on the
recommendation related to the various processes. Many of the
recommendations can be implemented without need for further discussion or
direction from the Coun' and I did not think it necessary to present the
Council with a detailed nalysis of what needs to be done to implement the
recommendations. Howe er, Council will obviously need to review and discuss
the recommendation that involves purchase of new equipment and certainly
those pertaining to the building modifications. In that regard, I would
give you one more reco endation and that is to conduct a workshop with City
staff (and possibly th consultant) to go over the proposed building
modification plans to re ch a final tlteam" consensus. Once the consensus
is reached, the Council could then consider hiring an architect to provide
the City with a cost es' te to modify to develop final plans and specs for
the building modifications.
~!;l(
.-
.
e
e
e
PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
.HASE I STUDY
Archive and Department Files:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
Time Table
Cost
No. 1-7
A. Require purchase of shelving and
boxes to store records.
Immediate
$300
B. Basement storage area is proposed
with building modifications.
6 mo. - 1 yr
Unknown
C . Need to consider hiring part-
time (temporary) personnel to
process and organize records for
permanent storage
6 mo. - 1 yr
$5200
Permit Application:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
Time Table
Cost
No. 1-6
A. Present secretary will retire
on January 28, 1994. New
secretary will be trained to
perform "clerical" type of duties
which will include issuance of
certain types of permits and
certificates.
3 - 6 mos.
e
B. Purchase of IBM Personal Computer
3 months
NJA
$4000
No.7
A. Depends on modification of municipal
building. See proposed layout, 6 mos - 1 yr _
Unknown
Benefit Process:
No.5
Implementation Plan Time Table Cost
A. Write computer program to integrate
with payroll system 1-1-94 $2500
B. Already implemented. N/A N/A
C. Requires development and printing
of time sheet. 1-1-94 Staff time
Recommendation
No. 1-4
No.6
e
1
Employee Payroll Process:
Recommendation 1m Time Table Cost e
No. 1-4 A. Wri e computer program to integrate
wit payroll system and requires
dev lopment and printing of time
Shl 1-1-94 Included in
benefit
cost
estimate.
No. 5 A.
Write computer program to sort
che ks 1-1-94 $50
I
No.6 A. Re . ew after payroll changes are
imp emented 6 mos - 1yr Unknown
No.7 A. Co vert all payrolls to biweekly 1-1-94 Unknown
Organizational Policies:
Recommendation 1m Time Table Cost
No. 1 A. Requires update of position
des. riptions 3-6 mos Staff time
No. 2-4 A. Re uires development of e
app opriate evaluation form 3-6 mos Staff time
No.5 A. ends on modification of
cipal building 6 mos - 1 yr Unknown
No. 6-7 A. De elop departmental training
pIa s/schedules 6 mos - 1 yr Staff Time
Building Utilization:
Recommendation 1m ntation Plan Time Table Cost
No. 1-7 A. Re uires modification of present
bu. ding as well as possible
ex ansion of city garage 6 mos - 1 yr Unknown
Reception Area:
Time Table
Cost
Recommendation
No.1, 3, & 4
1m
A. C04ld be implemented immediately.
Ho ever, a new phone system would
be necessity. Really depends on
e
2
modification of municipal building.
6 mos - 1 yr.
Unknown
-No.2
A. In place.
NJA
NJA
Phone System:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
Time Table
Cost
No. 1-3
A. See previous discussion (Reception
Area above) on modifying municipal
building.
6 mos - 1 yr.
Unknown
Computer:
Recommendation
No.6
Implementation Plan Time Table Cost
A. All but one station is IBM
compatible. Will require purchase
of PC for building secretary (city
clerk recently purchased new IBM). 3-6 mos $4000
A. Depends on modification of municipal
building. 6 mos - 1 yr. Unknown
A. Will require purchase of storage
service (could use library or water
board at minimal cost). 1-1-94 Minimal
A. To be determined. 1-1-94 NJA
A. Requires purchase of additional
phone line 1-1-94 $750 plus
monthly
line
charges
A. Could be done immediately.
However, should wait to determine
location of computer room 6 mos - 1 yr. $25
A. Will determine as necessary NJA N/A
A. To be determined with building
modification 6 mos - 1 yr. Unknown
No.1
No.2
No. 3
e
No. 4
No. 5
No. 7
No.8
Local Improvement Process:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
Time Table
Cost
No.1 - 2
A. In place.
NJA
NJA
e
3
No.3
B . Re~uires purchase of GIS system
an~ coordination with county GIS
dertment.
Purchase Order Process:
Recommendation
1m
No. 1-3
uires development of Council
cy
A.
No.4
A. Re uires administration of Council
po 'cy described in No.1 above
No.5
A. Ap ears to be unnecessary given
lev Is of inventory maintained
by City
Water Department Payroll:
Recommendation
1m
No.1
A. Re. uires Council policy decision.
Abput one hour of staff time per
mo th is spent on Water Board
Pa oll
Recommendation
Levied Special Assessment Rep rt Process:
1m
No.1
A. Ne d to determine CAD or GIS
ca abilities as it relates to
as essment report process
Council Minutes Process:
Recommendation Implembntation Plan
No. 1-2
A. Re uired purchase of IBM PC
(n w in place) and use of part-
t' e recorder
4
1yr-2yr
Time Table
3-6 mos
N/A
N/A
Time Table
N/A
Time Table
1yr-2yr
Time Table
N/A
$5,000 t.
10,000
Cost
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cost
N/A
e
Cost
See Local
Imp.
Process
Recommen(
tion #3
Cost
$3900 for
PC $1200
per year
for
Recorde.
City Council Agenda Process:
_Recommendation Implementation Plan
No. 1-2
A. City clerk function requires city
clerk to perform certain dutiesJ
tasks. Present distribution of
work load (with secretary) appears
to be appropriate.
Utility Billing Process:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
No. 1-3
A. Requires purchase of hardware and
software modifications
Sewer Oversizing Process:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
No. 1-2
A. Not a practical recommendation.
SOC is an assessment from Oak
Glen Development and should be
kept separate from building permit
recordkeeping as a check and
balance
e
City Code Process:
Time Table
NJA
Time Table
6 mo - 1 yr
Time Table
NJA
Recommendation
Implementation Plan Time Table
No.1
A. City attorney's office has been
responsible for city code update
process and latest update is nearly
completed. With city code entirely
on PC, staff (with assistance of city
attorney) can update city code
efficiently and economically. N J A
e
5
Cost
NJA
Cost
$2500
Cost
NJA
Cost
$300 to
$400 per
year
PHASE II - PUBLIC WORKS
General Engineering Process;
Recommendation
1m
ntation Plan
No.1
A. Re uires purchase of pagers (2-3)
for supervisory staff.
No. 2-3
A. Re uires development of reporting
system
No.5
A. Re uires development of depart-
meltal training plans/schedules
A. Re uires update of position
de criptions and departmental
wo kshops
No. 6-7
No.8
A.
No.9
A. Re uires purchase of GIS system
to aintain plat maps (as per
co nty).
No. 10-22
A. To be determined by new city
en neer
No. 23
A. Co nty program not available
for city at this time. Will
mo . tor
Equipment Shop:
Recoml11endation
1m lem ntation Plan
No. 1-25
A. To be determined by new city
en neer
Sewer Shop:
Recommendation
1m lem ntation Plan
No. 1-16
A. To be determined by new city
en neer
6
Time Table
1-1-94
3-6 mos.
6 mo - 1 yr
6 mo - 1 yr
6 mo - 1 yr
1- 2 yrs
3-6 mos
1-2 yrs.
Time Table
1-2 yrs.
Time Table
1-2 yrs.
e
Cost
$500/yr
Staff time
Staff time
Staff time
Staff time
See Loc~
Imp. .
Process
Recommenc
tion #3
Unknown
Unknown
Cost
Unknown
Cost
Unknown
e
Street Maintenance:
e Recommendation
Time Table
Implementation Plan
No. 1-5
A. To be determined by new city
engineer
1-2 yrs.
Parks:
Recommendation
Implementation Plan
Time Table
No. 1-13
A. To be determined by new city
engineer
1-2yrs.
e
e
7
Cost
Unknown
Cost
Unknown
. . pATE 15-Nov-93
PAGE 1
e STILL WATER HOURS
PROJECf WORD
INVOICE DATE CONSULTANT ANALYST PROCESSOR
AD-I APRIL 13 2.00
AD-I APRIL 16 4.00
AD-I APRIL 23 9.00
AD-I APRIL 27 7.50
AD-I APRIL 28 0.50
I TOTAL 2,.00 0.00 0.00 I
- -- - - --
AD-2 MAY 16 2.00
AD-2 MAY 17 8.00
AD-2 MAY 18 4.50
AD-2 MAY 19 1.00
AD-2 MAY 20 1.00 3.00
AD-2 MAY 23 11.00
AD-2 MAY 25 11.00 3.00
AD-2 MAY 26 2.00
AD-2 MAY 27 1.00
AD-2 MAY 28 6.50 1.00
e I TOTAL 49.50 15050 0.00 I
AD-3 MAY 28 0.75
AD-3 JUNE 1 1.00
AD-3 JUNE 4 8.00 1.00
AD-3 JUNE 5 2.00
Al)-3 JUNE 9 2.50 1.00
AD-3 JUNE 10 1.50
AD-3 JUNE 13 LSO
I TOTAL 23.50 7.00 0.751
PW-l JUNE 11 7.00
PW-l JUNE 12 3.50
PW-l JUNE 13 2.00
PW-l JUNE 14 0.5
PW-l JUNE 15 4.00
PW-l JUNE 16 0.$0
PW-l JUNE 18 4.50
PW-l JUNE 21 1.00
PW-l JUNE 22 3.50
e PW-l JUNE 22 2.50
PW-l JUNE 2, 0.50
I TOTAL 28.00 1.$0 0.00 I
DATE lS-Nov-93 PAGE 2
.
STILLWATER HOURS
PROJECf WORD e
INVOICE DATE TANT ANAL YST PROCESSOR
PW-2 JULY 2 6.50
PW-2 JULY 4 4.50
PW-2 JULYS 1.50
PW-2 JULY 6 S.oo 3.50
PW-2 JULY 7 10.00
PW-2 JULY 8 3.00 1.00
PW-2 JULY 9 6.50 1.00
PW-2 JULY 11 3.00
PW-2 JUL Y 12 '2JO
PW-2 JULY 13 2.00 1.00 0.25
PW-2 JUL Y 14 9.00 1.00
PW-2 JULY 15 2.00
PW-2 JUL Y 16 2.00
PW-2 JULY 19 7.00 1.00 1.00
PW-2 JUL Y 20 6.50 2.00 2.00
fTI - i
TOTAL 63.00 18.50 6.75
PW-3 AU03 1.00
PW-3 AUO 18 2.00 e
PW-3. AUO 19 4.00
PW-3 AUG 20 3.00
PW-3 AUG 24 8.00
PW-3 AUG 25 8.00
PW-3 AUG 26 1.00
PW-3 AUG 27 1.50 3.00
PW-3 AUG 30 1.50
PW-3 AUG 31 1.00 3.25
PW.. 3 SEPT 1 6.50 0.50
r TOTAL 28.00 12.50 3.751
PW-4 SEPT 2 2.00 OJO
PW-4 SEPT 6 3.00
PW-4 SEPT 7 1.00 0.50 4.25
PW-4 SEPT 8 4.50 1.00
PW-4 SEPT 13 0.50
PW-4 SEPT 15 2.00
PW-4 SEPT 25 2.50
PW-4 SEPT 27 0.50
PW-4 SEPT 28 4.00 1.50
PW-4 SEPT 30 2.00
I TOTAL 19.50 4.50 5.751 e
DATe D-Nov-~5
PAtiE3
..
STILLWATER HOURS
e PROJECT WORD
INVOICE DATE CONSULTANT ANALYST PROCESSOR
PW-5 ocr 1 0.75
PW-5 ocr 7 5.00
PW-5 ocr 11 2.00
I TOTAL 0.00 7.00 0.75 I
I~~
.. ... .\i%r- . - - I
- . -:2.1450... .::.':':::':.'d.--:.>:-::_'.:::::::i7.~Sj
e
e
5197 LAVAQUt:: ROAD DULUTH, MN 5580:3
PROMPT
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICE
:!
(218) 729-91~O
J & D ENTERPRISES, INC.
e
November 30, 1993
Mr. Russ Rosa
Short Elliot & Hendrickson
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
St_ Paulj MN 55110
Mr. Gary ft'unke
Acting Mayor
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Stillwater Junior High SOhool Demolition
Dear Mr. Rosa and Mr. Funke:
With this letter, we are requesting a two (2} week extension on
our demolition contract. This is due to the asbestos crew 5et
back, at the s'tart of the contract. We expect to be completed
with the project by December 1U, 1993.
e
If you have any questions or comments. please do not hesitate to
call.
sincer(lt ~
Dale eich
e
FAX (218) 729,6031
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOVER
800-541-7511
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS · HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH. STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
612-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612-430-4350
Donald C. Wisniewski, P_E_
Director Public Works/County Engineer
John p, Perkovich, Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J_ Theisen, P_E_, Deputy Director
Technical & Administrative Division
Richard D. Herold, P,E.
Design/Construction Engineer
November 15, 1993
James D_ Hanson, P,E.
Transportation Engineer
Edward Kapler,
Facilities Operations Manager
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Stillwater
21 6 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: McKusick Lake Road
Dear Mayor and Council:
I received a letter from your City Engineer expressing your concerns about the timing of
the paving of McKusick Lake Road. I am sure by now many of you have seen or heard
that the road has been paved. This work was done on Veteran's Day, November 11,
including patching of the road.
e
We did originally plan on having the paving done by November 1 st. We agreed to let the
contractor work further along McKusick and pave on this later date for two reasons. The
first was where we stopped will be easier to start again in 1994 than at Maple Street, and
the second reason was we wanted to get as much done as we could this year. This will
allow us to get past the golf course entrance next year as soon as possible.
The contractor will now be shut down until next spring. We will notify you of the
proposed schedule when we start up again. Overall the project has gone very well,
including the Neal Avenue portion, and we are sure its completion next year will be a great
benefit to area residents and road users.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any other concerns.
Sincerely,
~.J01 ' ~1w____
Donald J Theisen, Deputy Director
Technical and Administrative Services
DJT:slj
cc: Wally Abrahamson, County Commissioner
Dick Moore, City Engineer
e
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
{i C /1/3a/9 j
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS · HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
612-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612-430-4350
Donald C. Wisniewski, P_E_
Director Public Works/County Engineer
John P_ Perkovich, Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J_ Theisen, P.E., Deputy Director
Technical & Administrative Division
MEMORANDUM
Richard D. Herold, P_E_
Design/Construction Engineer
James D. Hanson, P,E.
Transportation Engineer
TO:
FROM:
Residents and Property Owners along County Road 5 Edward Kapler,
Facilities Operations Manager
DOn Theisen, Deputy Director ~JDi. ~ .
Technical and Administrative Services
DATE:
November 19, 1993
SUBJECT:
OPEN HOUSE FOR COUNTY ROAD 5 PROJECT
County Road 5, also known as Stillwater Boulevard, runs from Trunk Highway 36 through
Stillwater to Trunk Highway 96. I am sure as a resident of this road you have seen a
tremendous increas'e in traffic in recent years. We have also had the new Stillwater Area
High School open up south of Trunk Highway 36, and next year a new Target/Cub Foods
development will open east of County Road 5 and north of Trunk Highway 36. You can
see this site being graded right now.
e
The growth in traffic on this road is creating problems. I am sure many of you have
almost been in an accident, seen an accident, or unfortunately actually been involved in an
accident. There is also no place for pedestrians to walk safely, including school children.u - "
Our department is responsible for the County'Road system~:-anctwe are planning to ,~,:'"" -':. ,
improve County Road 5 to address these traffic and pedestrian problems. Not to do so,
would be irresponsible of us.
Our project limits run from Trunk Highway 36 to Croixwood Boulevard. We are proposing
to improve County Road 5 to a 4-lane divided roadway with traffic signals at Orleans
Street and an extension of Curve Crest Boulevard. We are also wiring for a future signal
at Croixwood Boulevard.
We need your helo in this effort. It is very important that we hear the concerns, ideas,
issues, etc., that you have about this project. We are just entering the design phase of
this project and need your input now. There is no project of this size that does not have
some impacts to adjoining properties. We also want to discuss these with you.
An Open House is scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 1993, from 4:30 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. at the Lily lake Elementary School Library. The school is located at 2003 W. Willard
Street. We will have our project design team at the Open House along with our
preliminary layout. Feel free to stop by anytime during the Open House hours.
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
..:~
;",,?
0.
'"
'"'~. ~
~-..J,
.~+~.OT.~ ~.o
. .
. .
.
~
\ ;!
ro. . ~'"
-"eu..'''-
If you cannot attend and would like more information or have questions, please feel free to
e contact me at 430-4300.
.--J~
""-",--
/'
~~" /- MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION
j("~'4~~ (
:: '~,ii;?:~ (, LOCAL NO.3 20
-/."
?~~'/ ( affiliated with the
I ~ INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
3001 University Avenue S.E.-Minneapolis. Minnesota 55414
Phone (612) 331-3873 Fax (612) 331-8948
November 10, 1993
Mr. Nile L. Kriesel, City Coordinator
City of stillwater
216 North Fourth
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: 1994 POLICE OFFICER CONTRACT
Dear Mr. Kriesel:
e
We have reviewed the proposal offered by the City in the above
referenced Bargaining Unit. We are suggesting that we have a
formal negotiating session at your earliest possible convenience.
I wish to point out that the Union is not interested in a two-year
agreement based upon the percentage increases you are offering in
either of the calendar years. Also, you have made no provision for
an insurance increase in the second year. The other items
requested by the Union have received no attention from you to this
point. If the City is really interested in a multiple year
agreement they will have to do much better then the current offer.
As indicated by the October 25, 1993 memo from Chief Beberg, the
Union is not in agreement with the change in the method of payment
being proposed. This is a negotiable item and we therefore are
placing it on the table for negotiations at this time.
Please contact me with dates that you will be available as soon as
possible.
Sincerely,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320
~L~L--
Business Agent
LMB/jmm
OPEIU-#12
~ cc: Art Sievert
United To Protect
~
.~...
/~;;j;-':.c ;;-i?5f..
0~".~':"\r;._l:.t_1;:-'.~~
~;~~1Jf
-..l" .:."
'.
_1"\
! ~
\ #~ 7 MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION
~ (~__.?(..,..;:: ( I L 0 C A L NO. 3 2 0
l "\~~.-";....0"~' I l affiliated with the
L --- "-..'\,,\ I TERNATIONAl BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
3001 Uni ersity Avenue S.E.-Minneapolis. Minnesota 55414
Phone (612) 331-3873 Fax (612) 331-8948
November 8, 1993
"
~, "
J.. /' ;\.~:: &~ t,~,..
f9.0~:Cr:.c;.f.~",~~ .
~. ~:.\:'. .~~~~'~':-/y~ [;,
_',,__./ 'r......--'~. ",>.1
'J ~~r~-
: ~--.-\...~. / '~':>"-'
h:A',A-'lci~'
:~< ~"(.:-~'
Mr. Nile L. Kriesel, City Coordinator
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth
stillwater, MN 5508
RE: 1994 POLICE OFF CER CONTRACT
Dear Mr. Kriesel:
The following are t e contract demands made on behalf of our
membership employed in the above referenced Bargaining unit.
Please review them a d be prepared to make a counter proposal at
your earliest convenience.
1. One year agreem nt effective 1-1-94 through 12-31-94.
2.
Wages: For all lassifications shall be adjusted by an amount
necessary to rea h the average wage rights reported by Stanton
for Group V.
e
3. Insurance shall be 100% employer paid.
4. Shift different al shall be established at 45~ per hour for
any shift that egins before 7 a.m. or ends after 3:30 p.m.
5. Vacation carry- ver of 1~ times the annual earnings shall be
allowed for eac employee.
6. All other items to remain as presently in effect. Local 320
reserves the ri ht to alter and/or modify demands during the
course of negot ations.
If you have any ques ions, please contact my office.
Sincerely,
~4TER~~OC~~2AO
C-L~~ g~'
BUSlness ent
LMB/jmm
OPEIU-#12
cc: Art Sievert
United To Protect
~
~OJ
IV
"-
~.
~
tit
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FR: Mayor Hooley
DA: November 24, 1993
RE: COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR TIME CAPSULE AND APPRECIATION DINNER
/1/. ... . .;AL,/0/1'
,/V0c.v. <'
Cou.ncil approval is needed for the burial of the time capsule o~ January~,
199M Also for an appreciation dinner for those committee chairman and
those who were responsible for the success of the Sesquicentennial year.
This will be by invitation only. The City has the appropriate funds to cover
the cost.
January ;18, 199!t';' is the anniversary of the opening ceremony for the
Sesquicentennial ~ar.
~7 _- ---, ,- /j j)
~C} - L/-:" (F}L('11~~~
~"t) l~/!
Q j(//
"'----.
e
e
e
'l
· dS
The Brlmeyer Group, Inc. .'
EXECUTIVE SEARCH CONSULTANTS ( .IY
One Tenth Ave. South
Hopkins, MN 55343
November 22, 1993
Mayor Charles M. Hooley
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th St.
Stillwater, MN 550R2
Dear Mayor Hooley:
Thank you for inviting The Brimeyer Group to assist you in the selection of a Secretary. As I
understand it, you have requested assistance in reviewing the job description, screening
resumes, and recommending several candidates for further consideration.
Based on the information you have provided us, we anticipate the time required for this
assignment would be approximately eight to ten hours. Our normal hourly rate is $125 plus
expenses. If you wish us to conduct telephone or in-person interviews we would charge you an
additional hourly fee.
Thank you for the opportunity to assist you in this effort. We look forward to working with
you.
Very truly yours,
~~
James Brimeyer
President
JB:pw
f//J-1/r;3
(612) 945-0246 . fax (612) 933-1153
. ~
j
e"01o PERSONNEL DECISIONS, INC.
lCln. Building Successful Organizations
29 November 1993
Mayor Charles Hooley
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor Hooley:
e
Thank you for your interest in the use of PDI's services for screening applicants for the
following positions:
. Senior Accounting Clerk
. Payroll Clerk
. City Clerk
I enjoyed the opportunity to speak with you last week.
As requested, I am writing to document the scope and estimated costs ofPDI's services.
PDI is prepared to design and implement a process to select the most qualified individuals as
finalists for these positions. To accomplish this, we propose a four-part process:
. Discussions (either via telephone or in person) with designated individuals to
detennine the most important criteria for screening
. Resume review to reduce the pool to a more manageable number
. Design of infonnation-gathering tools
. Evaluation of candidate responses to designate fmalists
The process described above will meet all state and federal requirements regarding legality
of selection procedures. I anticipate that the processes described. above could be completed
within thirty days from the close of applications. At this point, you could interview finalist
c.uldidates. It may be helpful to designate interview iimes now; we could notify candidates
in our correspondence to hold that time, should they become finalists.
Labor costs for the procedures described above would not exceed $3,750. Postage costs
would add no more than $125.
I look forward to the opportunity of working with you and the City of Stillwater.
Cordially,
/~:t ~Jf;t~
Harry ufi/ ~
Vice esident, Public Sector Services
Author: llany Broil; WP: Holly Urbanski; Editor: Karen Schwichtenberg
K:\DatalPuhSeclLlT&ProplStilI193,doc
e
2000 PLAZA VII TOWER. 45 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1608 · 612/339-0927
/
JANE KRENTZ
>(y
r
e
Senator - District 51
235 State Capitol
St. Paul. Minnesota 55155
Phone 612/296-7061
Fax 612/296-6511
Senate
November 25, 1993
State of Minnesota
Commander
Second Coast Guard District
1222 Spruce Street
St. Louis, MO 63103-2832
Attn: Docket CGD2-93-02
Dear Commander:
It
As a state senator who represents a substantial portion of the
St. Croix Valley and as a resident of May Township which adjoins
Stillwater, I have strong feelings about the proposed scheduled
changes of the lift bridge in Stillwater.
I carried legislation last year in the Senate asking the Coast
Guard to reevaluate the schedule based on serious traffic
congestion problems in Stillwater. The legislation passed the
Senate Committee but died in the House, not on its merits, but
due to unrelated political considerations. Although I live in
the country north of Stillwater, I shop, bank, attend church, go
to the doctor, dentist, etc. in Stillwater. I am keenly aware of
the huge traffic tie-up caused by the frequent lifting of the
bridge.
I am sure you have received detailed information as to the
negative environmental impact of this traffic congestion. The
wait to cross the bridge and related traffic delays have also
negatively impacted the business community. I would adamantly
support a more restrictive schedule. In fact, I would propose to
eliminate the elevation of the bridge when" traffic is heaviest.
Thank you for your support and input. I hope you give serious
consideration to this request.
Sincerely,
Jane Krentz
State Senator, District 51
e
cc: Mayor Charles Hooley
Stillwater, Minnesota
o
Rl.(~,(.It.cI Ptlpa
1fT( Post-
Consumt'r Fiher
COMMITTEES: Vice Chair, Education · Family Services. Judiciary · Transportation & Public Transit
~..
e
"'SBi
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200SEH CENTER, Sf PAUL, MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
November 30, 1993
RE:
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
WEST WINe JR. HIGH
PARKING LOT
SEH NO. A-STILL3298.00
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
On Tuesday, November 30,1993, eight bids were received for the West Wing Jr. High Parking
Lot construction. A summary of the bids is as follows:
1. Tower Asphalt, Inc. $476,756.00
2. T.A. Schifsky & Sons 478,252.03
3. Valley Paving, Inc. 508,520.46
4. Ace Blacktopping 525,971.90
5. Arnt Construction 540,059.95
6. Rice Lake Contracting 558,400.00
e 7. Aero Asphalt, Inc. 569,450.85
8. Pember Excavating 621,829.15
Engineers Estimate 494,935.70
The low bid was submitted by Tower Asphalt, Inc of Lakeland, Minnesota. We have had
experience with this company and believe they have the experience and financial ability to
complete a project of this size. Substantial completion is set for May 25, 1994 and final
completion by June 1, 1994.
, We would recommend that the West Wing Jr. High Parking Lot project be awarded to Tower
Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of $476,756.00.
Sincerely,
Richard E. Moore, P .E.
REM:bcp
Enclosure
c:
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
Mary Lou Johnson, City Clerk ;.-
Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
Dave Junker, Director of Public Works
e
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC_
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Sf CLOUD, MN
CHIPPEWA FALLS. WI
MADISON, WI
LWATER, MINNESOTA. BID DATE 11130193 e .
iT WING JR. HIGH PAR T PRINTED 11130193
-i, NO. STILL3298
fABULATION
ENGINEERS EST. TOWER ASPHALT, INC. T.A, SCHIFSKY & SONS. VALLEY PAVING. INC. ACE BLACKTOP, INC. ARNT CaNST, co.
EST, UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
- ulTEM U.NIT aUANL pRIgE..._ _.IQI~L . _. _.f'.R.ICE .IQI~L.... . PRICE . :rQI~!_. _~__PI'l!Qg._ . _TOTA!_____['81.QL.___ TOT~L_. .....!'BlgE _ ... TOTAL
KINGJ,oJ:
1 REMOVE TREE EACH 8 250.00 2,000.00 100_00 800.00 200.00 1,600.00 320.00 2.560.00 200.00 1,600.00 200_00 1.600.00
2 REMOVE WALL LF. 225 5.00 1,125.00 12,00 2,700_00 13,00 2,925.00 9.00 2,025_00 15.00 3,375.00 10.00 2,250.00
3 REMOVE LIGHT POLE EACH 4 175.00 700.00 100.00 400.00 110.00 440.00 150.00 600.00 150,00 600.00 400.00 1,600.00
4 REMOVE BIT. PAVEMENT SoY. 3,400 2,00 6,800.00 1.00 3,400.00 1.10 3,740.00 1.50 5,100.00 1.10 3.740_00 1.25 4,250_00
5 REMOVE CONC. C & G LF. 120 7.50 900,00 5_00 600.00 1.20 144.00 10.00 1,200.00 2.25 270.00 4.00 480,00
6 REMOVE SIDEWALK S.F. 3,900 0.75 2,925.00 0.25 975_00 0.35 1,365.00 1.30 5,070.00 0.35 1,365.00 0.50 1,950,00
7 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 100 6_00 600.00 15.00 1.500.00 3.30 330.00 17.00 1,700.00 4.00 400.00 10.00 1,000_00
A COMMON BORROW (L.V.) C.Y, 20673 3_00 62,019,00 4.50 93,028.50 4.00 82,692.00 4.26 88,066,98 4.40 90,981.20 5.40 111,634.20
8 12" R.C.P. CL V L.F. 190 25.00 4,750.00 17.50 3,325.00 18.50 3,515.00 29.50 5,605.00 19.50 3,705.00 23,20 4,408.00
9 CB M.H. TYPE B LF. 19 175.00 3,325_00 175,00 3,325_00 190,00 3,610_00 135.00 2,565.00 200.00 3,800.00 168_00 3,192.00
0 CASTING 3067 EACH 2 300.00 600_00 500,00 1,000.00 340.00 680.00 250.00 500.00 350.00 700.00 400_00 800,00
1 CASTING R-1730 EACH 1 300.00 300_00 350_00 350.00 240.00 240.00 410_00 410.00 450.00 450.00 300_00 300,00
2 CONNECT TO EXISTING CB EACH 1 250,00 250_00 350_00 350.00 380_00 380.00 475.00 475_00 385,00 385.00 1,550.00 1,550.00
3 ADJUST EXISTING CB EACH 1 750_00 750.00 1,000,00 1,000_00 900.00 900.00 1,300.00 1,300.00 980.00 980.00 725,00 725.00
4 ADJUST EXISTING SAN M. H_ EACH 2 800.00 1,600.00 1,000_00 2,000,00 900.00 1,800.00 900.00 1,800_00 980.00 1,960.00 725.00 1,450.00
5 2' CORPORATION EACH 1 350.00 350_00 500_00 500.00 375.00 375.00 650.00 650.00 385.00 385_00 150,00 150.00
6 l' COPPER L.F, 104 8.00 832_00 7.00 728.00 7,50 780.00 11.50 1,196.00 8.00 832.00 14,50 1,508,00
7 2' COPPER LF. 221 14.00 3,094_00 9_00 1,989.00 9.50 2,099_50 14.00 3,094,00 10.00 2,210_00 17.50 3,867,50
8 l' CURB STOP & BOX EACH 2 75.00 150.00 500_00 1,000.00 200,00 400.00 250.00 500,00 200.00 400_00 95_00 190_00
9 2' CURB STOP & BOX EACH 2 250.00 500.00 750.00 1,500.00 400.00 800.00 285.00 570.00 385.00 770.00 210_00 420.00
~O TYPE 1 HOSE BIB EACH 2 100.00 200.00 500_00 1,000.00 275.00 550.00 740.00 1,480.00 275.00 550.00 115.00 230.00
~ 1 CL5100%CRUSHEDAGGREGATE TON 3,275 9,75 31,931.25 5.00 16,375.00 5.00 16,375.00 7.30 23,907.50 8,00 26,200.00 8.50 27,837.50
~2 TYPE 41, BIT. WEARING COURSE TON 1,085 22_00 23,870.00 18.50 20,072.50 24.00 26,040,00 22.10 23,978.50 28_60 31,031.00 25.00 27,125.00
~3 B618C&G LF, 2,200 5_75 12,650,00 8.00 17,600_00 7.00 15,400_00 7.10 15,620_00 7.40 16,280_00 6_95 15,290,00
~4 4' CONC. SIDEWALK S,F. 500 2_95 1,475.00 2.00 1,000.00 2_20 1,100_00 2.20 1,100.00 2.25 1,125.00 2.10 1,050.00
'5 6' CONC. DRIVEWAY APRON S,Y_ 85 25_00 2,125,00 25_00 2,125_00 26_00 2,210.00 26_30 2,235_50 28_00 2,380.00 27_00 2.295_00
'8 UNIT PAVERS SF 3,125 4_00 12,500_00 3,00 9,375,00 3_15 9,843,75 3,35 10,468_75 3.40 10,625.00 5.70 17,812_50
? 6' LEAN MIX PAVER BASE S,F, 3.125 2,25 7,031_25 1,00 3,125.00 1.10 3,437_50 1.15 3,593_75 1.25 3,906.25 2_50 7,812.50
~8 2' WHITE LINE (SOLID) LF. 3,220 1.25 4,025.00 0,20 644_00 0_26 837,20 0.28 901.60 0_30 966.00 0.40 1,288_00
'9 PAVEMENT MARKING (HANDICAP) EACH 6 75_00 450_00 25.00 150.00 11.00 66.00 12.00 72.00 25_00 150.00 50_00 300.00
10 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 1,000.00 1,000_00 7,500_00 7,500,00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,000_00 4,000.00
============= ======SIl:===== ============= ======:=as==: ============= ====::====:=:
TOTAL PARKING LOT $190,827_50 199,437.00 185,674.95 209,344.58 215,101.45 248,365.20
lTING
\1 CONTROL CABINET EACH 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 7,500_00 7,500.00 6,150.00 6,150.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,775_00 3,775.00 3,500.00 3,500.00
,2 LIGHT UNIT 250 HPS(SINGLE) 22' POLE EACH 6 1,300,00 7,800_00 1,500.00 9,000,00 1,466.00 8,916.00 1,315.00 7,890.00 1,400.00 8,400.00 1,310.00 7,860,00
\3 LIGHT UNIT 250 HPS(TWIN) 22' POLE EACH 4 1,500_00 6,000.00 1,800.00 7,200_00 2,025_00 8,100.00 1,850.00 7,400_00 1,985.00 7,860.00 1,640_00 7,360_00
14 LIGHT UNIT 70 HPS 10' POLE EACH 12 1,900.00 22,800.00 1,600.00 19,200.00 1,578.00 18,936.00 1,800_00 19,200,00 1,725.00 20,700.00 1,600.00 19,200.00
15 CONCRETE BASES 22' POLE EACH 10 350.00 3,500.00 450_00 4,500.00 328.00 3,280.00 445.00 4,450.00 475.00 4,750.00 445.00 4,450.00
\6 CONCRETE BASES 10' POLE EACH 12 300.00 3,600,00 350,00 4,200.00 297.00 3,564.00 375.00 4,500.00 380.00 4,560.00 355.00 4,260.00
\7 CONDUCTOR 84 A.W_G. L.F. 4,000 0.80 3,200.00 0.55 2,200.00 0.63 2,520.00 0.56 2,240.00 0.60 2,400.00 0.55 2.200.00
18 CONDUCTOR 88 A. W.G. LF. 4,000 0.45 1,800.00 0.40 1,600.00 0.49 1,960.00 0.41 1,640.00 0.45 1,800.00 0.40 1,600_00
19 CONDUCTOR 810 A.w.G, L.F. 1,500 0.55 825.00 0_35 525.00 0_42 630.00 0.35 525.00 0.40 600.00 0.34 510.00
\0 CONDUCTOR 812 A.W.G_ L.F, 1,200 0.53 636_00 0_30 360,00 0.06 72.00 0.31 372.00 0.35 420.00 0.30 360_00
'1 CONDUIT 1 1/4' PVC L.F. 2,850 2.50 7,125.00 1.15 3,277.50 1.10 3,135,00 1.20 3,420.00 1.25 3,562.50 1.17 3,334.50
'2 CONDUIT 314' PVC L_F, 500 2.00 1,000_00 1_05 525.00 1.00 500.00 1.10 550.00 1.15 575.00 1.06 530.00
,3 PULL BOX EACH 2 300_00 600.00 750.00 1,500.00 230.00 460.00 410,00 820.00 435.00 870.00 410,00 820,00
14 TIME CLOCK EACH 1 400.00 400.00 600_00 600.00 440,00 440.00 325.00 325,00 345.00 345,00 325,00 325_00
i5 TOGGLE SWITCH EACH 1 50.00 50.00 400_00 400.00 63.00 63.00 225.00 225.00 225.00 225.00 210_00 210,00
>,6 IN- THE-LINE FUSE & FUSEHOLDER EACH 44 12_00 528_00 25_00 1.100.00 35_00 1,540.00 22,00 988_00 23.00 1,012.00 22_00 968_00
-----------~ =========: ========== ==========: =========== ==========::==
------------.
TOTAL LIGHTING $61,864,00 63,687_50 60,266_00 58,025.00 61,854.50 57,487.50
PAGE NO_ 1
.LWATER, MINNESOTA_ BID DATE 11130193 e .
,T WING JR. HIGH PAR OT PRINTED 11130/93
I'f. NO. STlLL3298
TABULATION
ENGINEERS EST. TOWER ASPHALT, INC. TA SCHIFSKY & SONS. VALLEY PAVING. INC. ACE BLACKTOP,INC, ARNT CONST_ CO.
EST. UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT
E ITEM _UNI1:. ._.<lliANLn. .!'R.ICE __J()TAI, f'F1ICE T9T~L. PRIC.E. _IQ~"'-n PRICE ._T()T~L. n.f'BL~E_. . . ___.TO~L..n u.J'BIC{: . ..TOT~L
_______..__m_
IL~N'.l~
17 SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5' CAL B&B TREE 10 400_00 4,000.00 300_00 3,000.00 315.00 3,150.00 310.00 3,100,00 330.00 3,300.00 289_00 2,890.00
18 SCOTCH PINE 3_5' CAL B&B TREE 13 400,00 5,200.00 135.00 1,755.00 140.00 1,820.00 140.00 1,820.00 160.00 2,080.00 175,00 2,275.00
19 TOWER POPLAR '15 CONT. B&B TREE 40 130_00 5,200.00 50.00 2,000.00 52.00 2,080.00 55.00 2,200.00 55.00 2,200.00 72.00 2,880,00
,0 AMERICAN LINDEN 2.5' CAL B&B TREE 16 400.00 6,400.00 210.00 3,360.00 220,00 3,520.00 215,00 3,440.00 235.00 3,760.00 232.00 3,712.00
,I DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS 24' HGT, B&B SHRUB 195 24.00 4,680.00 23.00 4,485.00 24.00 4,680.00 25.00 4,875.00 25.00 4,875.00 21.65 4,221.75
;2 SEA GREEN JUNIPER 18' SPA. CONT_ SHRUB 208 24_00 4,992.00 22.00 4,576.00 23.00 4,784,00 24,00 4,992.00 24.00 4,992.00 20,10 4,180.80
,3 JOHN CABOT HARDY SHRUB ROSE 18' HGT CONT. SHRUB 18 18.00 324.00 16.00 288.00 18.50 297.00 17_00 306.00 17.50 315.00 14.95 269.10
,4 TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 18' SPA. B&B SHRUB 52 35.00 1,820.00 45.00 2,340,00 47.00 2,444.00 48.00 2,496.00 50.00 2,600.00 21.65 1,125.80
,5 DWARF KOREAN LILAC 24' HGT B&B SHRUB 110 24.00 2,640.00 18_00 1,980.00 18.50 2,035_00 19,20 2,112.00 20.00 2,200.00 18_55 2,040.50
,6 ELEGANS HOSTA'l POT PLANT 88 7.80 686,40 5.00 440_00 5_25 462.00 5,50 484.00 5.50 484.00 8.75 770,00
,7 TOKUDAMA HOSTA'l POT PLANT 50 7.80 390_00 5.25 262_50 5_50 275.00 5_75 287.50 5_75 287.50 9_80 490.00
;8 WHITE NANCY DEAD NETTLE'l POT PLANT 352 7.80 2,745.60 4_00 1,408.00 4.20 1,478.40 4.50 1,584.00 4.50 1,584.00 6.70 2,358.40
,9 MOONBEAM COREOPSIS'l POT PLANT 130 6_90 897,00 4_50 585,00 4.75 617.50 4.80 624.00 5.00 650.00 7.20 936_00
lO CROWN VETCH 4' POT PLANT 220 6.90 1,518,00 2_50 550.00 2.60 572.00 2.75 605,00 2,75 605.00 1.80 396_00
,I BRIGHT STAR CONEFLOWER #1 POT PLANT 30 6_90 207.00 4_50 135.00 4.75 142.50 4.90 147.00 4.95 148.50 6.70 201.00
;2 WHITE LUSTER CONEFLOWER #1 POT PLANT 96 7_80 748,80 4_50 432.00 4.75 456.00 4,90 470.40 4.95 475.20 7_20 691.20
;3 STELLA D'ORO GOLD DA YLlL Y #1 POT PLANT 35 6_90 241.50 4.50 157.50 4.75 188,25 4.90 171.50 4_95 173.25 6_70 234,50
;4 SHEPHERDS WARNING CRANESBILL #1 POT PLANT 181 6_90 1,248.90 4_50 814.50 4,75 859.75 4,90 886_90 4.95 895.95 7.25 1,312.25
;5 WHITE SWIRL SIBERIAN IRIS #1 POT PLANT 316 6.90 2,180.40 4,50 1 ,422.00 4,75 1,501.00 4,90 1,548.40 4.95 1 ,564.20 7.75 2,449_00
;6 SARAH BERNHARDT PEONY #1 POT PLANT 448 9_90 4,435.20 7_00 3,136,00 7.30 3,270_40 7.35 3,292.80 7.50 3,360.00 8.75 3,920.00
;7 BLACK EYED SUSAN #1 POT PLANT 129 6.90 890_10 4_50 580_50 4.75 612.75 4.75 812.75 4,95 638.55 7.25 935.25
;8 AUTUMN JOY SEDUM #1 POT PLANT 135 6_90 931.50 4,00 540_00 4_20 567.00 4_50 607.50 4,50 607.50 7_25 978.75
;9 GLOBE THISTLE #1 POT PLANT 45 7.80 351.00 4_00 180,00 4,20 189.00 5.00 225.00 4,50 202.50 7_25 326_25
10 CHATTERBOX CORAL BELLS #1 POT PLANT 167 6_90 1,152_30 4_50 751.50 4.75 793_25 4_75 793_25 4.95 826.65 7_25 1,210.75
11 STEEL EDGING LF_ 1.585 4_00 6,340_00 3_00 4,755_00 3.10 4,913.50 3_30 5,230_50 3_35 5,309,75 4_75 7.528_75
12 MULCH 4' DEPTH C_Y_ 135 1.50 202_50 22_00 2,970_00 23.00 3,105_00 23_00 3,105_00 25_00 3,375,00 2_60 351.00
13 SODDING S_Y_ 2,866 3_00 8,598_00 2_00 5,732_00 1.53 4,384.98 1.58 4,528_28 1.65 4,728.90 2.40 6,878.40
14 SEEDING - MIXTURE (WILD FLOWER) ACRE 0_17 1,500,00 255_00 5,000.00 850.00 3,705_88 630,00 4,800_00 816.00 5,000.00 850_00 2,000,00 340_00
15 WOOD FIBER BLANKET S,Y_ 200 6.00 1,200.00 4_00 600.00 0,92 184_00 1.00 200.00 1.50 300.00 2_00 400.00
------------ :::::::::========: ========== =========== ==========: -------------
------------- -------------
TOTAL LANDSCAPING $70,475_20 50,285_50 49,990.28 51,560.78 53,388_45 56,302.45
-AINING WALL
16 ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILING, TYPE 1 LF_ 290 80_00 23,200.00 70.00 20,300_00 73.50 21,315.00 74.00 21,460_00 75_00 21,750.00 72.00 20,880.00
17 ORNIMENTAL METAL RAILING, TYPE 2 LF. 280 80_00 22,400,00 70.00 19,600.00 73.50 20,580.00 74.00 20,720.00 75,00 21,000.00 72.00 20,160.00
18 STRUCTURE CONCRETE (1M3) C,Y. 133 200,00 26,600,00 200_00 26,600.00 320.00 42,560.00 320,50 42,626.50 350,00 46,550.00 314_00 41,762.00
19 STRUCTURE CONCRETE (3Y43) C_Y_ 140 230_00 32,200_00 350,00 49,000.00 355.00 49,700.00 353,00 49,420.00 375.00 52,500_00 314.00 43,960,00
lO REINFORCEMENT BARS LB. 25.550 0,50 12,775.00 0_50 12,775,00 0.63 16,096_50 0.65 16,607.50 0,65 16,607.50 0.62 15,841.00
31 STONE RUSTICATION S.F. 1,888 10.00 18,680_00 12.00 22,416.00 12.60 23,536.80 12.70 23,723.60 13.75 25,885.00 12.35 23,069.80
32 REINFORCED CONCRETE STEPS WI EDGE BEAM SF RISER 107 50,00 5,350.00 35_00 3,745_00 32.50 3,477.50 32,50 3,477.50 35_00 3,745.00 32_00 3,424.00
33 REINFORCED CONCRETE WALKS WI EDGE BEAM, 6' SF 94 6.00 564.00 15.00 1,410.00 32.50 3,055.00 32.50 3,055,00 35.00 3,290.00 32.00 3,008.00
34 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION LS. 1 30,000_00 30,000,00 7,500_00 7,500,00 2,000_00 2,000.00 8,500,00 8,500.00 4,500,00 4,500.00 5,800.00 5,800.00
------------ ============ ============ ============ ========== =============
-----------
TOTAL RETAINING WALLS $171,769.00 $163,346_00 $182,320.80 $189,590.10 $195,627.50 $177,904,80
TOTAL PROJECT $494,935.70 $476,756.00 $478,252.03 $508,520.46 $525,971.90 $540,059,95
PAGE NO_ 2
_LWATER. MINNESOTA. BID DATE 11130193 e e
:;r WING JR. HIGH PAR T PRINTED 11/30/93
H. NO. STILl3298
TABULATION
RICE LAKE CONTRACT. AERO ASPHALT. INC. PEMBER EXCAVATlNG.INC.
EST. UNIT UNIT UNIT
E __. ____ o:.i:O~ .. .9_f',l.IT qUA.f',lL__ . ..ff'llfE:.... !QT!'L . .~19g".____.__TQT_~l,.. .__-"'_f'lLl2i:O. . _T()~__
USING L9T
1 REMOVE TREE EACH 8 250.00 2.000.00 350.00 2.800.00 208.00 1,664.00
2 REMOVE WAll LF. 225 13.00 2.925.00 14.40 3.240.00 10.45 2.351.25
3 REMOVE UGHT POLE EACH 4 95.00 380.00 144.00 576.00 158.00 632.00
4 REMOVE BIT. PAVEMENT S.Y. 3.400 1.10 3.740.00 1.15 3.910.00 0.56 1.972.00
5 REMOVE CONC. C & G L.F. 120 2.10 252.00 2.30 276.00 2.70 324.00
6 REMOVE SIDEWALK S.F. 3.900 0.31 1.209.00 0.35 1.365.00 0.90 3.510.00
7 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 100 5.00 500.00 4.05 405.00 6.87 687.00
'A COMMON BORROW (L.V.) C.Y. 20673 4.20 86.826.80 4.60 95.095.80 5.25 108.533.25
8 12" R.C.P. CL V LF. 190 18.40 3,496.00 20.40 3.876.00 35.42 6.729.80
9 CB M.H. TYPE B LF. 19 187.00 3.553.00 207.00 3.933.00 187.33 3.559.27
10 CASTING 3067 EACH 2 278.00 556.00 300.00 600.00 271.93 555.86
11 CASTING R-1730 EACH 1 178.00 178.00 300.00 300.00 354.87 354.87
12 CONNECT TO EXISTING CB EACH 1 364.00 364.00 400.00 400.00 125.86 125.86
13 ADJUST EXISTING CB EACH 1 936.00 936.00 1.035.00 1.035.00 733.56 733.58
14 ADJUST EXISTING SAN M. H. EACH 2 936.00 1.872.00 1.035.00 2.070.00 725.62 1,451.24
15 2" CORPORATION EACH 1 364.00 364.00 400.00 400.00 314.49 314.49
16 1" COPPER L.F. 104 8.00 832.00 8.00 632.00 15.55 1.617.20
17 2" COPPER L.F. 221 10.00 2.210.00 10.30 2.276.30 18.03 3.984.63
18 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 2 187.00 374.00 207.00 414.00 134.71 269.42
19 2" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 2 364.00 728.00 400.00 800.00 212.00 424.00
20 TYPE 1 HOSE BIB EACH 2 260.00 520.00 285.00 570.00 490.24 980.48
21 CL 5 100% CRUSHED AGGREGATE TON 3.275 8.84 28.951.00 7.85 25.708.75 8.06 26.396.50
22 TYPE 41. BIT. WEARING COURSE TON 1,085 27.60 29,946.00 28.00 30.380.00 27.56 29.902.60
23 B618C & G L.F. 2,200 7.00 15,400.00 7.45 16.390.00 8.06 17.732.00
24 4" CONC. SIDEWALK S.F. 500 2.10 1.050.00 2.20 1.100.00 2.66 1.330.00
25 6" CONC. DRIVEWAY APRON S.Y. 85 27.00 2.295.00 27.50 2.337.50 28.79 2.447.15
26 UNIT PAVERS SF 3.125 3.12 9.750.00 3.30 10.312.50 7.22 22.582.50
27 6" LEAN MIX PAVER BASE S.F. 3.125 1.04 3,250.00 1.10 3.437.50 2.20 6.875.00
28 2" WHITE LINE (SOLID) L.F. 3.220 0.10 322.00 0.30 966.00 0.26 837.20
29 PAVEMENT MARKING (HANDICAP) EACH 6 30.00 180.00 11.00 66.00 10.40 62.40
JO TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 3.000.00 3,000.00 20,000.00 20.000.00 2,026.10 2.026.10
==::==z::===::== =====_.s=== ========-====
TOTAL PARKING LOT 207,959.60 235.872.35 250.945.63
CiTING
31 CONTROL CABINET EACH 1 3,507.00 3.507.00 3.710.00 3.710.00 5.241.60 5.241.60
32 LIGHT UNIT 250 HPS(SINGLE) 22' POLE EACH 6 1.323.00 7.938.00 1.400.00 8.400.00 1.367.60 8.205.60
33 LIGHT UNIT 250 HPS(TWIN) 22' POLE EACH 4 1.856.00 7,424.00 1.965.00 7.860.00 1.830.40 7.321.60
34 LIGHT UNIT 70 HPS 10' POLE EACH 12 1,614.00 19.368.00 1.710.00 20,520.00 1.248.00 14.976.00
35 CONCRETE BASES 22' POLE EACH 10 449.00 4.490.00 475.00 4.750.00 598.00 5.980.00
36 CONCRETE BASES 10' POLE EACH 12 359.00 4.308.00 400.00 4.800.00 353.60 4.243.20
37 CONDUCTOR '4 A. W.G. L.F. 4.000 0.55 2.200.00 0.60 2.400.00 0.82 3,280.00
38 CONDUCTOR'8 A.W.G. L.F. 4.000 0.40 1.600.00 0.45 1,800.00 0.55 2.200.00
39 CONDUCTOR '10 A.W.G. L.F. 1.500 0.34 510.00 0.40 600.00 0.45 675.00
10 CONDUCTOR '12 A.W.G. L.F. 1.200 0.30 380.00 0.33 396.00 0.34 408.00
11 CONDUIT 1 1/4" PVC L.F. 2.850 1.20 3,420.00 1.25 3.562.SO 3.57 10.17 4.SO
12 CONDUIT 3/4" PVC LF. SOO 1.10 550.00 1.15 575.00 4.62 2.310.00
13 PULL BOX EACH 2 411.00 822.00 430.00 860.00 332.80 665.60
14 TIME CLOCK EACH 1 328.00 328.00 345.00 345.00 470.08 470.08
15 TOGGLE SWITCH EACH 1 208.00 208.00 220.00 220.00 62.40 82.40
16 IN.THE-L1NE FUSE & FUSEHOLDER EACH 44 22.00 968.00 24.00 1.056.00 24.44 1.075.36
------------- ========= ========--===
-------------
TOTAL LIGHTING 58,001.00 61.854.50 67,288.94
PAGE NO.3
LlWATER, MINNESO. BID DATE 11130193 e .
ST WING JA. HIGH P OT PRINTED 11130193
.H. NO. STILL329B
TABULATION
RICE LAKE CONTRACT. AERO ASPHALT. INC. PEMBER EXCAVATING. INC.
EST. UNIT UNIT UNIT
IE _____._II.~M U!'!JT . Q.UANT . ... PRICE.. T()TAL Pf'l.lC.E... -ro.T AL. PRICE TQTjl,L
~R~.~!:!.~
47 SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL. B&B TREE 10 312.00 3,120.00 330.00 3.300.00 249.60 2,496.00
48 SCOTCH PINE 3.5" CAL B&B TREE 13 140.00 1,820.00 148.50 1.930.50 228.80 2,974.40
49 TOWER POPLAR '15 CONT. B&B TREE 40 52.00 2,080.00 55.00 2.200.00 62.40 2,496.00
50 AMERICAN LINDEN 2.5" CAL B&B TREE 16 218.00 3,488.00 231.00 3.696.00 206.00 3,296.00
51 DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS 24" HGT. B&B SHRUB 195 24.00 4,680.00 25.30 4.933.50 28.08 5,475.60
52 SEA GREEN JUNIPER 18" SPA. CONT. SHRUB 208 23.00 4,784.00 24.20 5.033.60 22.88 4,759.04
53 JOHN CABOT HARDY SHRUB ROSE 18' HGT CONT. SHRUB 18 17.00 306.00 17.60 316.80 26.00 468.00
54 TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 18" SPR. B&B SHRUB 52 47.00 2,444.00 49.50 2.574.00 41.60 2,163.20
55 DWARF KOREAN LILAC 24" HGT B&B SHRUB 110 19.00 2.090.00 19.80 2.178.00 26.00 2,860.00
56 ELEGANS HOSTA'l POT PLANT 88 5.00 440.00 5.SO 484.00 7.26 840.64
57 TOKUDAMA HOSTA'l POT PLANT 50 5.SO 275.00 6.00 300.00 7.28 364.00
58 WHITE NANCY DEAD NETTLE'l POT PLANT 352 4.00 1,408.00 4.40 1.548.80 4.16 1,464.32
59 MOONBEAM COREOPSIS'l POT PLANT 130 5.00 6SO.OO 5.00 6SO.OO 4.16 540.80
60 CROWN VETCH 4" POT PLANT 220 3.00 660.00 2.75 605.00 3.12 688.40
61 BRIGHT STAR CONEFLOWER'l POT PLANT 30 5.00 150.00 5.00 150.00 4.68 140.40
62 WHITE LUSTER CONEFLOWER '1 POT PLANT 96 5.00 480.00 5.00 480.00 4.68 449.28
63 STELlA D'ORO GOLD DA YLlL Y '1 POT PLANT 35 5.00 175.00 5.00 175.00 5.20 182.00
64 SHEPHERDS WARNING CRANES BILL #1 POT PLANT 181 5.00 905.00 5.00 905.00 6.24 1.129.44
65 WHITE SWIRL SIBERIAN IRIS #1 POT PLANT 316 5.00 1,580.00 5.00 1,580.00 5.72 1.807.52
66 SARAH BERNHARDT PEONY #1 POT PLANT "448 7.00 3.136.00 7.70 3,449.60 6.24 2,795.52
67 BLACK EYED SUSAN #1 POT PLANT 129 5.00 645.00 5.00 645.00 4.68 603.72
68 AUTUMN JOY SEOUM #1 POT PLANT 135 4.00 540.00 4.40 594.00 4.68 631.80
69 GLOBE THISTLE #1 POT PLANT 45 4.00 180.00 4.40 198.00 4.68 210.60
70 CHATTERBOX CORAL BELLS #1 POT PLANT 167 5.00 835.00 5.00 835.00 4.68 781.56
71 STEEL EDGING L.F. 1.585 3.00 4.755.00 3.30 5,230.50 4.16 6,593.60
72 MULCH 4" DEPTH C.Y. 135 23.00 3,105.00 24.00 3.240.00 26.00 3,510.00
73 SODDING S.Y. 2.866 2.40 6,878.40 1.65 4.728.90 1.51 4,327.66
74 SEEDING - MIXTURE (WILD FLOWER) ACRE 0.17 8,000.00 1.360.00 4,000.00 680.00 7,280.00 1,237.60
75 WOOD FIBER BLANKET S.Y. 200 1.00 200.00 1.00 200.00 2.08 416.00
============: =======_=::1== =============
TOTAL LANDSCAPINC 53,169.40 52,841.20 55,501.10
rAINING WAll
76 ORNAMENTAL METAL RAILING, TYPE 1 LF. 290 80.00 23,200.00 75.00 21,7SO.OO 72.80 21.112.00
77 ORNIMENTAL METAL RAILING, TYPE 2 LF. 280 80.00 22,400.00 75.00 21.000.00 72.80 20,364.00
78 STRUCTURE CONCRETE (1A43) C.Y. 133 350.00 46,550.00 242.00 32,186.00 317.20 42,187.60
79 STRUCTURE CONCRETE (3Y43) C.Y. 140 620.00 86,800.00 638.00 89,320.00 348.40 48.776.00
30 REINFORCEMENT BARS LB. 25,550 0.60 15,330.00 1.10 28,105.00 0.62 15.841.00
61 STONE RUSTICATION S.F. 1,868 15.00 28.020.00 11.00 20,548.00 12.48 23,312.64
62 REINFORCED CONCRETE STEPS WI EDGE BEAM SF RISER 107 40.00 4,280.00 28.80 3,080.20 32.24 3,449.68
!!3 REINFORCED CONCRETE WALKS WI EDGE BEAM, 6" S.F. 94 35.00 3.290.00 4.40 413.60 32.24 3,030.58
64 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION L.S. 1 9,400.00 9,400.00 2,500.00 2.500.00 70,000.00 70,000.00
=========== ==========: =======
TOTAL RETAINING W. $239,270.00 $218,882.80 $248,093.48
TOTAL PROJECT $558,400.00 $569,450.85 $621,829.15
PAGE NO.4
~
e
'4t
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
City Coordinator
DA:
November 24, 1993
RE:
BUSINESS LICENCING
The City Council has) at least two - three times in the past 15 years,."
discussed the issue of licensing businesses in the City of Stillwater. The
primary purpose of requiring a business license is to ensure that the
business complies with building codes and fire codes. Without some form of
review (such as would be available if licensing would be required) there
is a strong possibility that the Building and Fire department may not be
aware of building conversion/remodeling. I think Allen Zepper's previous
memo to Council dated December 19, 1989 does a good job of pointing out the
problems that could occur. A minimal fee of $25 - $30 is recommended.
The registration form could also be used to gather information such as type
of business, ownership of the building and the business if different (Le.,
names, addresses, telephone numbers of residence or corporate office), etc.
that could be useful data for other uses. Further, in order to obtain a
Class III ISO insurance rating the City will have to develop information
pertaining to the layout and contents of the buildings.
I think we could get the process going by hiring someone (possibly an
intern) to do a property record search plus a survey to identify all
businesses within the City (this would be useful information even if the
Council decided not to license businesses). I would estimate that this
preliminary work would take about two - three weeks at a cost of $400 - $600.
Time permitting, I can discuss this further with you Tuesday.
//-~.
7~ ~
, -', ,/ -', ,~_._- ,"\ .-':'
" ."- " "'.. .-...,. "- I .-~''''''' ".'\. .,~,.
,. \. j" ,'. t ' - ,
((.. ..' {(J' )) j ~=:!)\\II
'-'::::' ~i U L
M E M 0
illwater
-- ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
~
ANDUM
TO:
FROM
ALLEN O. ZEPPER, BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE:
Dec. ie:!, . ':1&9
RE:
Business Li
in Stillwatet~
----------------------- ---------------------------------------------
There have been seve
my opinion that busines
is shared by Fire Chief
In the past, we have
origionally in the Gran
once again moved to the,
. i
call came, the crew res
Grand Garage. If I icen
happened.
We get many calls a ear asking if a certain company is doing
busine~s'in Stillwater. Unless they are a member of the Chamber, I
do not~know of anyway o keep track of who is doin~ what kind of
business in town. This is most embarrassing when someone as "don't
you eyen know who your' us i ness peo.pl e are"?
Wei~are in the proces of straightening out a situation in the old
Goggins Building at 4th and Churchill. Two business started to move
"in with no Zoning, Fil"e Or Building Department review or permits. In
doings so, the remodeli g that was done closed off required exits and
caused violations to bo h the Fire and Building Codes. It was an~
expensive venture for t e business owner, as some of the work he had
done had to be removed nd redone differently. A license requirement
would have prevented this, as the business owner would have had to
come in to talk to us b fore they got started.
We do not believe this has to be anything other than a one time
license, unless the business moves or changes ownership, and perhaps
the fee would only have to be enough to cover the cost of
administering the licen e, but both the Fire and Building Departments
feel it would be a very helpful tool in the carring out of our
dut i es.
al incidents recently that once again renew
es in Stillwater be licensed. This opinion
Seim.
had an emergency run to a dress shop that was
Garage, moved to the Main Street Square and
old Post Office Building. When the emergency
onded to the only known address which was the
e updates were necessary this would not have
-
Thank You
.. d~_ ,"1~___ I
~~rdY ~~
Fire Chief
tt
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
e
e
November 22,'1993
Mayor and Council
Nile L. Kriesel, City Coordinator
City of Stillwater
216 No. Fourth St.
Stillwater, Mn, 55082
I am writing this letter to let you know, officially, that I will be retiring from the City Clerk
position on Friday, January 28, 1994,
I appreciate the opportunity Council has given me to use my skills and grow professionally
and I know I will miss appearing every morning at work, at Council meetings and elections,
My eyes and ears will be tuned to any news regarding Stillwater,
Also, I will miss working with you and my other friends at City Hall, but I will be looking
forward to retirement and the opportunity to do a little traveling with my husband, visiting
our daughter and family on the east coast and enjoying some of the hobbies I have put off for
so many years,
Sincerely,
/'-~~u 1JI'-~~
Mary Lou Johnson
City Clerk
e
.
WIIDD
A M 1220
Smith Broadcasting Company, Inc.
104 North Main Street Stillwater. Minnesota 55082 612/439-5006 · FAX 612/439-5015
November 18, 1993
Dear Listener:
Thank you for contacting WIMN to express your concern and frustration about
unwanted reception of the radio station. WIMN is licensed by the Federal
Communications Commission to operate under strict guidelines of frequency and power,
Because of your comments regarding unwanted interference over the last few weeks, I
directed W!MN's Chief Engineer and the manufacturer of our transmitter to again verify
that we have done everything possible to make sure that our operation complies with the
terms of our license. All reports show that everything technically possible has been done
on our end,
e
Electrical phenomena are not always easy to trace, Many factors, often beyond
our control, may contribute to unwanted radio reception,
Weare enclosing a copy of material prepared by the government on this subject.
We trust that you will find it helpful. Some of you have found remedies to the problem on
your own. I appreciate you sharing anything that could be helpful so that I may pass it on
to others. One listener picked up an AT&T (model number Z 1 OOB 1 for the telephone)
Radio Interference Filter for approximately $15.00 at thelocal Wal-Mart, It was easily
installed and it cut out all interference! You may want to try this method. We also have
information regarding other types of interference we can pass along to you if the enclosed
book does not cover your problem, Should we learn of any more possible remedies
applicable to your situation, we will, of course, pass them on immediately,
Thanks again for your support and patience.
e
7~t \ P .dl[iP I
~iW{ ZHfJ)J.
Vice President and General Manager
Smith Broadcasting Company, Inc,
WIMN AM 1220
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
~~
1:\''''
. :;,;~-"
,9-
N\'
'~~
.
WlmD
A M 1220
Ene.
cc:
S ith Broadcasting Company, Inc.
104 trth Main Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 612/439-5006 · FAX 612/439-5015
I
Paulette R. BarteriajIl
Federal Communic~tions Commission
Field Operations Bureau
2025 Sloan Place, Suite 31
Maplewood, MN 55117-2058
I
Jerry Miller I
Miller & Miller, P.
Suite 760
1990 M Street.
Washington, DC 2 036
Mr. Nile Kriesel'
Stillwater City Coordinator
216 North Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
e
e
e
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: City Coordinator
DA: November 24, 1993
RE: BUSINESS LICENCING
The City Council has) at least two - three times in the past 15 years",
discussed the issue of licensing businesses in the City of Stillwater. The
primary purpose of requiring a business license is to ensure that the
business complies with building codes and fire codes. Without some form of
review (such as would be available if licensing would be required) there
is a strong possibility that the Building and Fire department may not be
aware of building conversion/remodeling. I think Allen Zepper's previous
memo to Council dated December 19, 1989 does a good job of pointing out the
problems that could occur. A minimal fee of $25 - $30 is recommended.
The registration form could also be used to gather information such as type
of business, ownership of the building and the business if different (i.e.,
names, addresses, telephone numbers of residence or corporate office), etc.
that could be useful data for other uses. Further, in order to obtain a
Class III ISO insurance rating the City will have to develop information
pertaining to the layout and contents of the buildings.
I think we could get the process going by hiring someone (possibly an
intern) to do a property record search plus a survey to identify all
businesses within the City (this would be useful information even if the
Council decided not to license businesses). I would estimate that this
preliminary work would take about two - three weeks at a cost of $400 - $600.
Time permitting, I can discuss this further with you Tuesday.
{j
r-
<'1
.p X--A' Jl
V,& (J-
Qf~~.
(C~ (Q) ~QJV
r illwater
l~ -'~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
e
M E M 0
ANDUM
TO:
Nile Kt~ie el
!
ALLEN O. IZEPPER, BUILDING OFFICIAL
i
Dec. 19, 1'::189
FROM
DATE:
RE:
business Li ensing in Stillwater
----------------------- ---------------------------------------------
There have been sevetal incidents recently that once again renew
my opinion that businesfes in Stillwater be licensed. This opinion
is shared by Fire ChiefiSeim.
In the past, we haveihad an emergency run to a dress shop that was
origionally in the Grand Garage, moved to the Main Street Square and
once again moved to the old Post Office Building. When the emergency
call came~ the crew res onded to the only known address which was the
Grand Garage. If licen e updates were necessary this would not have
happened. e
We get0many calls a ear asking if a certain company is doing
. business. in Stillwater. Unless they are a member of the Chamber, I
do not~know of any way ~o keep track of who is doing what kind of
business:in town. T~~sl is most embarrassing when someone as "don't
you even know who your usiness peo.ple are"?
We;rare in the proces of straightening out a situation in the old
Goggins Building at 4th and Churchill. Two business started to move
.;t'lin w.ith no Zoning, Fil"'e or Building Department review or permits. In
..",- doi ngs so, the remode Ii g that was done closed off required ex its and
caused violations tobo h the Fire and Building Codes. It was an
expensive venture for t e business owner, as some of the work he had
done had to be removed nd redone differently. A license requirement
would have prevented th's, as the business owner would have had to
come in to talk to us b fore they got started.
We do not believe th's has to be anything other than a one time
license, unless the bus'ness moves or changes ownership, and perhaps
the fee would only have to be enough to cover the cost of
administering the licen e, but both the Fire and Building Departments
feel it would be a very helpful tool in the earring out of our
dut i es.
Thank You
~~-it~--- .
Fire Chief
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
/
FR: Mayor Hooley OUtCJ-' ~... ',/, , ~';7j cy ,7 ,/ </
.----....":..-
DA: November 24, 1993
RE: INVITATION TO THE GUSTHAUS +-
On Sunday, December 5, 1993, at 2 p.m. some of our citizens from our Sister
City in Ruhpolding Germany will be at the Gusthaus. Carl Shoene has invited
the Mayor and City Council to be present.
Please RSVP to Sheila on Monday, November 29, in order to let Mr. Shoene
know how many will be attending the dinner.
ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
5637 Brooklyn Boulevard
Suite 200
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
(612) 533.7272
_FAX (612) 531.9269
r~
5780 Lincoln Drive
Suite 112
Edina, MN 55436
(612) 9.35.8711
B1X (612) 531-9269
FAMILY CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER
November 19, 1993
TO: Mayors
RE: Legal Service/Mediation -- A Partnership
AS governmental entities, we are constantly being pushed to deliver
increasing government service with less and less resources.
Over the past several years, some innovative, creative programs
have been developed through partnerships and cooperative efforts
between the private and public sector to deliver services. As a
result, we have been able to obtain results not possible by either
the public or private sector.
e
In our system of government, the judicial branch of government is
designated as the vehicle to resolve'disputes and conflicts between
citizens (individuals, business, government). The obvious question
is "can similar partnerships be created in the judicial branch?"
The answer is, yes, we can.
As you review your 1994 budget and particularly your budget for
legal costs, I hope you will consider seriously looking at dramatic
ways to change the way in which we handle conflicts. I refer to
conflicts with contractors, constituents, among staff/council, etc.
We can't make any dramatic changes in legal costs by merely shop-
ping around for more of the same.
I'm suggesting that you adopt a policy requlrlng that all civil
conflicts be handled through the mediation/arbitration process
(there are now proposed rules which would require all disputes to
be submitted to Alternative Dispute Resolution before submitting to
litigation).
We would be happy to make a presentation to your councilor to be
available to answer questions about the process. As a former State
Senator and former Mayor of Brooklyn Center, a practicing attorney
for 20 years, and now a full-time professional mediator, I think I
can effectively serve you in mediating and/or arbitrating disputes.
sincerely,
tt Dean A. Nyquist
DAN/wmb
e PLAINTIFF
.,
DEFENDANT
.1
e
ORDER
FOR
JUDGMENT
ON
CLAIM
AND
COUNTER
CLAIM
JUDGMENT
AND
NOTICE
OF
JUDGMENT
'UNSCRIPT
.DGMENT
"
( I --'
:....----'
'\ Iud ent and Notice of Iud
State of Minnesota
nt
Conciliation l."
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
NO. S7 93 685
CRAIG ZACHMAN
6908 HARRIET AVE SO
~
AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE
POBOX 59176
PLAINTIFF
#2
MPLS MN 55459 0173
RICHFIELD MN 55423
va.
va.
216 N 4TH ST
DEFENDANT
.2
STILLWATER MN 55082
Appearances:
Plaintiff
Defendant _ Neither Party
Settlement Agreement
Cone. Ct. R. 1.12 (4)
The parties hereto have agreed upon a seulement of the within controversy. which agreement is as follows:
~..
~ . a .' 50 cyi) .. .\i' . ~ .'
~6gt:t~+IA~ili~ -t Y3~9~1s?~I~
'I)1e~es fI er ..../. that the)' will abide the ~ ent be ~ herein based upon this agreemenL
~. ./ /ii ... 17 ~ .
OefetlClant
Upon evidence received. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
That the
shall have judgment against the
in the sum of $
plus filing fees of $
Dated:
, for a total of $
Judge:
. ....
The above order of ~ coon constitutes the JudgmenL .'
The parties are hereby notified that the clerk has entered Judgment as indicated above. but the Judgment is stayed by statue
until 4: 30 P.M. (to anow time for an appeal if desired);
Dared:
Deputy:
I cenify that the above is a correct transcript of the Judgment rendered in the Coun plus increased costs.o
$ from County Court.
Dated:
Oerk:
Deputy:
Marie Sllnlit:iR
..
e
e
-
"'
CONCILIATION COURT APPEALS TO DISTRICT COURT
According to statute, ft party has a right to appeal the
decision of the Conciliation Court to District Court. Before you
do this, however, you should be aware of the following.
1. You may be required to pay an extra $250.00 if you lose.
Minnesota Statute 487.30, s~bdivision 8, provides that the
appealing party shall be ordered to pay to the opposing party
$250.00 as costs, if he or she does not prevail in District Court.
You should read the statute carefully before you decide to
appeal.
2. District Court is different from Conciliation Court.
Conciliation Court gives each party a chance to state his or
her case without the constraints of rigid procedural and
evidentiary rules. The purpose of Conciliation Court is to en-
able parties to litigate small claims without the expense of attorneys
and large court costs, and without complicated procedural re-
quirements.
This is not true of District Court.
When a Conciliation Court case is appealed to District Court,
the parties will be expected to adhere to the Rules of Evidence and
Civil Procedure. For this reason, the parties should obtain an
attorney.
The judges recognize that, in some cases, the amount of money
in dispute is so low that hiring an attorney would not be'
practical. In such cases, the judge may offer minimal assistance
to the unrepresented party, such as telling him or her where to
sit or when to speak. Additionally, the judge may answer the
litigant's procedural questions during trial. However, no one
should make the mistake of assuming that District Court will be as
easy and informal as Conciliation Court. No special consideration
will be given to a party merely because he or she does not have an
attorney.
If you de~ide to come to District Court without an attorney,
you will be expected to conduct yourself just as lawyers do during
a trial. Everything that is said at a District Court trial is
recorded by an official court reporter. Therefore, it is very
important that persons speak one at a time and not interrupt each
other. You will be able to state your case at a certain point in
the trial, and you will be able to cross-examine the opposing
party. After the opposing party has spoken, you will always be
given an opportunity to respond. At the end of the trial, you will
be allowed to summarize your case, if you desire. Therefore, it
is alw9_~r<; improper to argue back and forth during a District Court
tri"~. fou should wait your turn and, eventually, you will be
allowed to speak uninterrupted.
e
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
~~
FR: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DA: November 24, 1993
RE: TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING
The State of Minnesota has changed the requirements to include additional
information that must be presented and' discussed at the Truth in Taxation
public hearing.
Specific information for the previous year (1992), current year (1993) and
proposed budget year (1994) must be presented on:
a. percent of total proposed budget representing total compensation
costs for employees (wages, salaries, benefits, etc.);
b. number of employees by general classification and whether they
are full-time or part-time;
c.
budgeted expenditures for and numbers of consultants and other
independent contractors (including maintenance agreements); and
d. the effect of budget increases or decreases on the proposed
property tax levy including the change in procedure for HACA
deduction.
Another change made by the state requires the City to adopt the final tax
levy and final budget at a meeting held after the Truth in Taxation public
hearing. The City has set the date of December 7, 1993, at 7 p. m. for this.
(Prior to the close of the Truth in Taxation public hearing, the date, time
and location of the subsequent hearing should be announced to the public.)
Also, I have attached the schedules and information that will be presented
at the Truth and Taxation public hearing.
e
e
e
Proposed 1994 Property Taxes
All taxing jurisdictions in Stillwater
City of Stillwater (23.1 % )
Washington County (22.0 %)
Other (4,3%)
Va-Tech (1.1 %)
I.S.D. #834 (49.5%)
Proposed Payable 1994 Tax Capacity Rates
City of Stillwater 29.485%
Washington County 28.023%
I.S.0. #834 63.078%
Vo- Tech 1.429%
Other 5.490%
Total 127.505%
e
1994 Proposed Tax Levy
City of Stillwater
General (70.0%) /
e
General
Debt Service
Total
e
Debt Service (30.0%)
$1 ,938,704
$830,746
$2,769,450
e 1994 Budget
General Fund Revenue
Property Taxes (40.5%)
Licenses & Permits (5.0%)
e
Miscellaneous (2,8%)
Fines & Forfeits (2.1 %)
Charges for Services (8,7%)
Intergovernmental (40.8%)
1994 Budget
General Fund Revenue
e
Property Taxes
Licenses & Permits
Intergovern mental
Charges for Services
Fines & Forfeits
Miscellaneous
Total
$1,938,704
$238,395
$1,952,905
$418,094
$98,500
$135,765
$4,782,363
e
e
e
1994 Budget
General Fund Expenditures*
Public Safety (43.8% )
Solid Waste
Public Works
Other
Public Safety
General Government
Culture & Recreation
Total
Other (1.2 % )
Public Works (20.3%)
General Government (16.4%)
$55,000
$969,617
$55,402
$2,094,227
$786,107
$822,010
$4,782,363
Solid Waste (1.2%)
Culture & Recreation (17.2%)
*Excluding Capital Outlay
4It 1994 Budget
Operating Expenditures
General Fund
General Government Mayor & Council
Elections
Admin. & Finane
Legal
Plant/City Hall
Total
Police
DARE
Fire
civil Defense
Planning
Inspection
Total
General
streets
Shop
Signs & Lightin
Total
Culture & RecreationParks
Library
Lily Lake
Total
Solid Waste
Retiree's Medic
Miscellaneous
Parking
Total
Public Safety
Public Works
-SOlid Waste
Other
--
$58,524
$13,518
$493,721
$149,937
$70,407
$1,205,500
'$1,000
$591,146
$5,168
$160,585
$130,828
$118,370
$565,201
$142,046
$144,000
$290,315
$517,862
$13,833
$55,000
$43,620
$7,000
$4,782
$786,107
$2,094,227
$969,617
$822,010
$55,000
$55,402
$4,782,363
e City of Stillwater Actual Actual Proposed
PROPERTY TAX LEVY Pavab~1.99g Payai:>Je 199.~ Pay~ble 19~!
General $2,540,426 $3,142,419 $1,938,704
Debt Service $578,263 $548,604 $830,746
Library $437,210 $0 $0
HACA ($896,131 ) ($973,019) N/A
Equalization Aid ($39,634) ($41,935) N/A
Total $2,620,134 $2,676,069 $2,769,450
$ INCREASE FROM PRIOR YEAR $55,935 $93,381
% INCREASE FROM PRIOR YEAR 2.13% 3.49%
TAX CAPACITY RATE 26.861 % 28,651 % 29.485%
Increase from prior year 1.790% 0.834%
% Increase from prior year 6.7% 2,9%
Notes: For Payable 1993, upper tier of market value for homestead property was eliminated
and effectively decreased total city tax capacity. (Homes over $150,000 had
decreases of up to 12%)
e
N/A: For Payable 1994, HACA & Equalization Aid are not subtracted from the tax levy
-
RESIDENTIAL HOMESTEAD COMPARISON
e
Estimated Tax Proposed
Market Value Capacity Payable 1994*
68,000 680 $ 200.49
75,000 740 218.18
100,000 1,240 365.61
125,000 1,740 513.04
150,000 2,240 660.46
250,000 4,240 1,250.16
500,000 9,240 2,724.41
Tax Capacity Rate:
29.485%
NOTES:
* Assumes NO increase in market value.
Tax Capacity:
1st $72,000 at 10%
Over $72,000 at 2.0%
e
e
Actual
Payable 1993*
$ 194.82
212.02
355.27
498.53
641.78
1,214.80
2,647.35
28.651%
Dollar
Increase
$ 5.67
6.16
10.34
14.51
18.68
35.36
77.06
Percent
Increase
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
e
City of stillwater
Salaries & Compensation
GENERAL FUND
Mayor & Council
Elections
Admin. & Finance
City Attorney
Plant/city Hall
Police
Fire
Inspection
Civil Defense
P.W. General
Street
Shop
Planning
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
Total General Fund Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
50.12%
1992
Actual
$41,262
$9,551
$329,454
$42,119
$18,166
$987,004
$423,000
$50,173
$2,216
$99,245
$241;547
$78,494
$103,453
$2,425,684
$4,839,729
e
LIBRARY FUND
Operations
Plant
TOTAL LIBRARY FUND
Total Library Fund Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$328,760
$18,190
$346,950
$519,002
66.85%
PARK FUND
Total Park Fund Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$200,254
$303,441
65.99%
SEWER FUND
Total Sewer Fund Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$85,454
$1,445,383
5.91%
PARKING FUND
Total Parking Fund Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$19,530
$45,693
42.74%
LILY LAKE FUND
Arena
Beach
TOTAL LILY LAKE
Total Lily Lake Exp.
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$83,257
$10,360
$93,617
$212,446
44.07%
e
TOTAL SALARIES
Total Expenditures
Salaries as a percent
of total expenditures
$3,171,489
$7,365,694
43.06%
1993
Budget
$40,419
$0
$339,907
$43,312
$13,345
$1,031,326
$437,013
$52,057
$2,346
$105,288
$253,565
$81,364
$126,157
$2,526,099
$4,989,448
50.63%
$338,115
$20,020
$358,135
$553,146
64.75%
$228,330
$369,139
61.85%
'$88,154
$1,296,376
6.80%
$33,071
$67,521
48.98%
$89,249
$11,842
$101,091
$278,529
36.29%
$3,334,880
$7,554,159
44.15%
1994
Budget
$45,277
$9,900
$326,626
$44,756
$13,789
$1,024,101
$452,701
$101,267
$2,808
$93,236
$257,701
$83,233
$126,930
$2,582,325
$5,183,993
49.81%
$351,062
$20,684
$371,746
$544,332
68.29%
$222,929
$382,515
58.28%
$176,011
$1,391,342
12.65%
$32,579
$62,845
51.84%
$89,983
$11,303
$101,286
$218,333
46.39%
$3,486,876
$7,783,360
44.80%
General Classification 1992 1993 1994
FT PT FT PT FT PT
City Coordinator 1 1 1
Library Director 1 1 1
Finance Director 1 1 1
e Police Chief 1 1 1
Fire Chief 1 1 1
Comm Dev Director 1 1 1
Pub Wks Director 1 1 1
Police Captain 1 1 1
Asst Fire Chief 1 3 1 3 1 3
Librarian I 3 3 3
Building Official 1 1 1
City Clerk 1 1 1
Asst Pub Wks - Street 1 1 1
Asst Pub Wks - Parks 1 1 1
Planner 1 1 '1
Police Sargeant 3 1 3 1 3
Ice Arena Manager 1 1 1
Juvenile/Investigator 3 3 3
Fire Captain 2 3 3 3 3 3
Library Associate 4 4 4
Patrol Officer 8 8 8 8 8 8
Fire Engineer 3 10 2 10 2 10
Licensed Sewer Worker 2 2 2
Sr Acct Clerk 2 2 2
Chief Mechanic 1 1 1
Mechanic 1 1 1
Secretary/Dispatcher 1 1 1
e Heavy Equip Operator 4 4 4
Parkkeeper 2 2 2
Secretary 3 3 3 1
Library Asst II 1 1
Jr Parkkeeper 2 2 2
Light Equip Operator 2 2 2
Jr Acct Clerk 1 1 1
CSO Officer 1 1 1
Labor/Maintence Wkr 1 6 1 10 1 8
Library Asst I 2 1 2 2 2 2
Custodian 1 1 1
Pkg Enforcement Officer 1 1 1
Code Enforcement Officer 1 1
Lifeguards (seasonal) 7 7 7
Fire Lieutenant 2 2 2
Firefighter 12 12 12
Library Page 5 5 5
Zamboni Operator 4 4 4
Concession Worker 3 3 3
Clerk Typist 1 1 1
Recording Secretary 1 1 1
Asst Building Inspector 1
City Engineer 1
TOTAL 60 76 61 81 63 80
e
e
Maintenance & Repair
Elections BRC
CDP
DC Hey
Wybrite
Friden
Wahl & Wahl
Coordinated Business Syste
Paul Glaser
Equipment Supply
BCA
Capitol Communications
Motorola
Business Machines
Minn. Comm.
Comm. of Transportation
Washington Co. Library
3M
Total
~.other Prof. Services
., Labor Relations
Legal
Jim's Bldg.
Russell Burmaster
Oakdale Inspections
SEH
Miller Excavating
MCGladrey & Pullen
Croixland Excavating
Washington Co. Assessor
Dennis Watson
Total
e
1992
Actual
$1,700
$4,745
$896
$4,896
$731
$664
$1,044
$2,400
$6,692
$1,320
$2,213
$2,208
$513
$563
$3,944
$2,805
$728
$38,062
$3,536
$93,621
$347
$0
$2,775
$27,074
$2,807
$21,585
$3,723
$35,534
$2,629
$193,631
1993
Budget
$0
$4,850
$900
$5,515
$471
$664
$1,050
$2,400
$7,110
$1,350
$2,225
$2,240
$525
$600
$5,000
$1,800
$728
$37,428
$6,000
$95,700
$0
$0
$9,200
$22,000
$0
$21,500
$0
$32,500
$3,500
$190,400
1994
Budget
$1,700
$4,950
$900
$5,715
$635
$675
$1,065
$2,400
$7,150
$1,350
$2,250
$2,240
$525
$600
$5,000
$2,000
$728
$39,883
$6,000
$98,000
$500
$1,500
$8,000
$10,000
$2,500
$22,150
$2,500
$38,100
$3,500
$192,750
e
1994 BUDGET RECAP
EXCLUDING CAPITAL OUTLAY AND DEPRECIATION
Revenue Expenditures Surplusj(Deficit)
Requested Revised Requested Revised Requested Revised
General Fund 5,034,080 4,782,363 5,135,450 4,782,363 (101,370) 0
Library 551,704 536,862 560,051 536,862 (8,347) 0
Parks 314,265 296,615 314,265 296,615 0 0
Lily Lake 217 ,248 213,333 217 ,248 202,833 0 10,500
Parking 63,845 62,845 63,845 62,845 0 0
Solid Waste 1,025,107 1,026,707 1,024,460 1,024,460 647 2,247
Sewer 1,321,000 1,376,000 1,274,854 1,367,642 28,995 8,358
e
e
I
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
1992 1993 Budget 1994 1993-1994 1993~1994
1\ctual Budget Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dee) 'I; Inc. (Dee) Comments
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Mayor and Council
Personnel 41,2b2 40,419 45,277 45,277 4,858 4,858 12% 12% $4680 incr. in insurance
services & Charges 35,164 16,925 7,247 7,247 (9,678) (9,678) (57.2%) (57,2%) $10,000 in 1993 for
legal feeS
Miscellaneous 2Llli 10,000 10,000 6,000 0 (4,OOO) 0 ~
Total Operating 79,389 67,344 62,524 58,524 (4,820) (8,820) (7.2\) ( 13%)
Elections
Personnel 9,551 0 9,900 9,900 9,900 9,900 100\ 100% 1993 was not an election
year
Supplies 1,521 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 100\ 100\
Services & Charges 2,371 0 2,468 2,468 2,468 2,468 100% 100\
Miscellaneous ~ Q ~ -12Q -12Q -12Q 100% 100\
Total Operating 13,576 0 13,518 13,518 13,518 13,518 100% 100\
Capital Outlay 25,723 0 0
Administration/Finance
Personnel 329,454 339,907 335,705 326,626 4,202 (13,281) 1.2% (3.9%) 1/2 of secretary moved
to inspection dept. in
1994, $5000 included
for admin. intern
Supplies 8,790" 11,250 11,950 10,350 700 (900) 6,2% (8%)
Services & Charges 100,389 107,651 130,645 124,145 22,994 16,494 21.4\ 15.3% $15,000 included for
records retention
Miscellaneous 33,167 29,250 35,600 32,600 6,350 ~ 21. 7% 11.5% $3000 added for Chamber
of Commerce donation
Total Operating 4'11,800 488,058 513,900 493,721 25,842 5;663 5,3\ 1.2%
Capital Outlay 0 10,805 7,710 8,510
Legal/City Attorney
Personnel 42,119 43,312 44,756 44,756 1,444 1,444 3,3\ 3_3%
Supplies 2,105 2,200 2,255 2,255 55 55 2,5\ 2,5%
Services & Charges 96,492 100,031 102,426 102,426 2,395 2,395 2.4% 2.4%
Miscellaneous 335 500 500 500 0 0 2- 0
Total Operating 141,051 146,043 149,937 149,937 3,894 3,894 2.7% 2.7\
e
e
e
~
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
1992 1993 Budget 1994 1993-1994 1993-1994
J\ctual Budget Requested Revised $ Inc, (Dee) % Inc. (Dee) Comments
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Plan t/City lIall
Personnel 18,166 13,345 13,789 13,789 444 444 3.3% 3.3%
Supplies 3,405 4,500 4,850 1\,700 350 200 7.8% 4,4%
Service & Charges 42,302 55,748 56,568 51,368 820 (4,380) 1.5\ (7,9%) $4760 decrease in
utilities
Miscellaneous 467 -.-1QQ ~ 550 -lli 250 83.3\ 83.3%
'rotal Operating 64,340 73,893 75,757 70,407 1,864 (3,486 ) 2.5% (4.7%)
Capital Outlay 73,836 21,000 38,000 251,222
Police
Personnel 987,004 1,031,326 1,153,414 1,024,101 125,088 (7,225) 12,1\ ( .7%) Reduced F,T. - O.T.
by $7000
Supplies 28,037 33,774 39,368 35,156 5,594 1,382 16,6\ 4,1\
Services & Charges 117,867 112,207 121,930 116,097 9,723 3,890 8,7\ 3,5%
Miscellaneous 29,686 32,505 31,951 30,146 ( 554) (2,359) ll.J.ll 11.:l.ll $1000 decrease to
Y.S,B.
Total Operating 1,162,594 1,209,812 1,346,663 1,205,500 139,851 (4,312) 11. 6\ ( ,4%)
Capital Outlay 3,655 64,933 100,754 70,742
Fire
Personnel 1\23,000 437,013 452,701 452,701 15,688 15,688 3,6% 3.6\
Supplies 7,353 12,000 12,000 8,600 0 (3,1\00) 0 (28,3%) Reduced to actual
Services & Charges 119,501 121,317 126,920 125,920 5,603 4,603 4,6% 3.8%
Miscellaneous 1,974 5 ,375 6,625 3,925 ~ (1,450) 23.3% (27%) Reduced to actual
Total Operating 551,828 575,705 598,246 591,146 22,541 15,441 3.9% 2.7%
Capital Outlay 0 25,000 18,256 3,256
Civil Defense
Personnel 2,216 2,346 2,808 2,808 462 462 19.7% 19,7% Increase to actual
Supplies 0 50 50 50 0 0 0 0
Services & Charges 1,54'1 2,054 2,210 2,210 156 156 7,6% 7.6% Increase to actual
Miscellaneous ~ ~ ---1QQ 100 1l.QQl 1l.QQl (50%) (50%) Reduced to actual
Total Operating 3,783 4,650 5,168 5,168 518 518 11.1% 11.1%
Capital Outlay 0 0 13,000 13,000
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
'e
e
f)
LIBRARY F1JND
1992 1993 Budget 1994 1993-1994 1993-1994
^cLual lludqet Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dec) '. Inc. (Dec) Conunents
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Hevenues
Charges for services 5,506 7,500 7,500 7,500 0 0 0 0
Book Sales 3,311 3,000 3,500 3,~00 500 500 16.7% 16.7%
Mi.scellaneous 8,676 6,650 8,000 8,000 1,350 1,350 20,3% 20,3%
General Fund Transfers 505,593 519,712 532,704 517,862 12,992 (l,850) ~ -L:ill
Total Operating 523,086 536,862 551,704 536,862 14,842 Q 2,8% 0
Capital Outlay Bonds 3,392 16,284 23,690 7,470
Grand Total 526,478 553,146 575,394 544,332
Expenditures
Operations
Personnel 328,760 338,115 351,062 351,062 12,947 12,947 3,8% 3.8%
Supplies 84,059 88,250 90,500 68,911 2,250 (19,339) 2.5% (21.9%)
Service & Charges 45,276 50,177 52,030 50,930 1,853 753 3.7% 1.5%
Miscellaneous 3,1\62 2,500 3,200 2,700 700 ~ 28.0% .8%
Total Operating 461,557 479,042 496,792 473,603 17 ,750 (5,439) 3.7% ( 1.1%)
Capital Outlay 3,392 10,284 6,100 1,680
Plant
Personnel 18,190 20,020 20,684 20,684 664 664 3.3% 3.3%
Supplies 3,381 4,200 4,275 4,275 75 75 1.8% 1.8%
Services & Charges 29,467 31,500 36,100 36,100 4,600 4,600 14.6% 14.6%
Miscellaneous 3,016 ~ .2t1..QQ .2t1..QQ --1QQ 100 4.8% 4.8%
Total Operating 54,054 57,820 63,259 63,259 5,439 5,439 9.4% (9,4%)
Capital Outlay 0 6,000 17 , 590 5,790
Operating 515,611 536,862 560,051 536,862 23,189 0 4,3% 0 Heduced to 1993
Budget
Capital Outlay 3,392 16,284 23,690 7,470
Grand Total 519,003 553,146 583,741 544,332 40,939 0
e
e
e
(;
PARK FUND
1992 1993 Budget 1994 1993-1994 1993-1994
^ctuill Budget Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dec) % Inc. (Dee) Corrunents
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Revenues
Donations 7,100 0 0 1,300 0 1,300 0 100%
Trust Income 0,825 11,000 11 ,000 3,000 0 (8,000) 0 (72,7%)
Miscellaneous 8,306 1,500 3,300 2,000 1,800 500 120% 33.3%
Transfer from General Fund 258,914 294,739 299,965 290,315 5,226 (4,424) 1.8% ( 1. 5%)
Total Operating 283,145 307,239 314,265 296,615 7,026 (10,624) 2,3% (3.5%)
Capital Outlay Bonds 47,995 61,900 91,900 85,900
Grand 'fotal 331,140 369,139 406,165 382,515
I;:xpenditures
Personnel 200,254 228,330 233,179 222,929 4,849 (5,401) 2,1% (2,4%) O.T, reduced $3500 &
P.T. reduced $5875
Supplies 21,513 30,620 30,920 27,520 300 (3,100) 1.0% (10.1%) Reduced to actual
Services & Charges 32,323 45,049 46,926 44,426 1,877 (623) 4.2% (1.4%)
IHscellaneous 1,357 3,240 3,240 1,740 0 (1,500) 2-- (46.3%) Reduced to actual
Total Operating 255,447 307,239 314,265 296,615 7,026 (10,624) 2.3% (3.5\)
Capital Outlay 47,995 61,900 91,900 85,900
Grand Total 303,442 369,139 406,165 382,515
e
e
e
7
LILY LAKE FUND
1992 1993 Budget 1994 1993-1994 1993-1994
l\ct.ual Budget Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dec) % Inc. (Dec) Comments
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Revenues
Concessions 2B,32U 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 0 0 0
l\rena Rental 143,520 127,000 143,000 143,000 16,000 16,000 12.6% 12.6% Increase to actual
Arena Admissions 11,531 8,500 11 , 000 11 ,000 2,500 2,500 29.4% 29.4% Increase to actual
Skating Lessons 1 , 1139 1,500 1,500 1,500 0 0 0 0
Softball Fees 2,921 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous 19,771 5,700 5,500 5,500 (200) (200) D-:.:ill. D-:.:ill.
Total Operating 207,2GO 181,200 199,500 199,500 18,300 18,300 10.1% 10.1%
Capital Outlay Bonds 2,051 57,870 61,700 5,000
General Fund 'l'ransfer 29,746 30,009 17 ,748 13,833
Grand Total 239,057 269,079 278,948 218,333
Expenditures
Arena
Personnel 83,257 89,249 89,983 89,983 734 734 ,8% ,8%
Supplies 28,955 28,650 29,750 29,750 1,100 1,100 3.8% 3,8%
Services & Charges 52,299 61,362 63,548 58,548 2,186 (2,814) 3,6% (4,6%)
Miscellaneous 3,785 6,650 6,850 5,850 ~ .@QQl ~ (12,0%) Reduced to actual
'rotal Operating 168,296 185,911 190,131 184,131 4,220 (1,780) 2.3% ( 1. 0%)
Capital Outlay 0 9,500 30,700 5,000
Beach
Personnel 10,361 11,842 12,918 11,303 1,076 (539) 9.1% (4.6%)
Supplies 1,073 1,150 1,200 1,200 50 50 4.3% 4.3%
Services & Charges 2,555 2,906 3,599 3,399 693 493 23,8% 17.0% Increase to actual
Miscellaneous ---.Q 400 400 0 0 illQl 0 (100%) Reduced to actual
Total Operating 13 , 989 16,298 18,117 15,902 1,819 (396) 11.2% (2.4%)
Capital Outlay 585 0 31,000 0
Hallf ield
Supplies 750 2,000 2,000 1,000 0 (1,000) 0 (50%) Reduced to actual
Services & Charges 345 ~ 7,000 1,800 0 (5,200) 0 (74.30.) Reduced to actual
Total Operating 1,095 9,000 9,000 2,800 0 (6,200) 0 (G8.9%)
Capital Outlay 0 48,370 0 0
Total Lily Lake
Operating - excluding depr.183,380 211,209 217,248 202,833 6,039 (8,376) 2.9%
Capital Outlay 585 57,870 61 , 700 5,000
Grand Total 183,965 269,079 278,948 207,833
e
e
e
e
e
e
9
SOLID WASTE FUND
1Sl<J2 1993 Budg()t 1994 1993-1994 1993-1994
^clual Budget Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dee) % Inc. (Dee) Corrunents
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Revenues
Service Charges 850,832 1,016,634 911,400 913,000 (105,234) (103,634) (10.4%) (10,2\) Eliminate incr in rates
Other 736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
General Fund Transfers 47,500 54,666 55,000 55,000 334 334 ,6\ .6%
Washington County
Recycling Grant 61,050 50,100 58,707 58,707 8,607 8,607 17 .2% ~
Total Operating 960,118 1,121,400 1,025,107 1,026,707 (96,293) (94,693) (8,6%) (8,4\)
Expenses
Supplies 1,83) 1,000 2,500 2,500 1,500 1,500 150\ 150% Increas() to actual
Service and Charges 960,095 1 , 119,900 1,021,460 1,021,460 (98,440) (98,440) (8,8%) (8,8%) Eliminate incr in rates
Miscellaneous 0 500 500 500 0 0 0 -5L-
Total Operating 961,926 1,121,400 1,024,460 1,024,460 (96,940) (96,940) (8.6\) (8.6%)
e
e
e
10
SEWER FUND
1992 J993 1994 Budget 1993-1994 1993-J994
Actual Budqet Requested Revised $ Inc. (Dee) % Inc, (Dee) Comments
Requested Revised Requested Revised
Revenues
Service Charge 1,242,972 1,207,676 1,239,000 1,259,000 31,324 51,324 2.6% 4,2% Increase to actual
Other Charges 200,517 30,000 70,000 85,000 40,000 55,000 133.3% 183.3% Increase to actual
Interest Income 46,876 15,000 12,000 32,000 (3,000) 17 ,000 (20.0%) 113.3%
Total Operating 1,490,365 1,252,676 1,321,000 1,376,000 68,324 123,324 5,5% 9.8%
Expenses
Personnel 85,454 88,154 90,624 176,011 2,470 87,857 2,8% 99,7% Added 1/2 of pw/
Engineer personnel
Supplies 5,644 14,000 14,000 6,500 0 (7,500) 0 (53,6%) Reduced to actual
Service & Charges 1,140,170 1,133,371 1,170,230 1,167,980 36,859 34,&09 3,3% 3.1\
Miscellaneous 7 ,680 17 ,151 17 ,151 17,151 ~ 0 0 ~
Total Operating 1,238,948 1,252,&76 1,292,005 1,367,&42 39,329 114,966 3.2% 9,2%
e
e
e
1994 CAPITAL OUTLAY
e
Administration/Finance
Terminal w/cash register/printer
CAFR on micro software
Indexing System
Lateral File
Chairs
Requested
$
2,700
3,550
750
710
Recommended
$3,500
o
3,550
750
710
Total
$7',710
$8,510
Plant/City Hall
Camera for City Council Chambers
Telephone and Voice Mail
ADA Modifications
Remodeling
Unidentified
$
28,500
9,500
2,000
28,500
9,500
200,000
11,222
Total
$38,000
$251,222
e
Police
Two Used Typewriters
Copy machine
Fax machine
Four live traps
Dictation equipment
Two portable cellular phones
Three protective vests
Storage locker
Cameras
Two radar units
Records computer
Five mobile data terminals
Three squad w/changeovers
639
7,455
852
340
1,500
852
2,875
300
1,500
5,455
7,505
23,963
47,518
o
o
o
340
o
o
o
300
1,500
5,455
7,505
23,963
31,679
Total
$100,754
$70,742
Fire
e
Total
2,343 0
1,299 0
1,786 0
511 0
248 257
851 0
1,323 0
2,999 2,999
1,997 0
2,023 0
2,876 0
$18,256 $3,256
Deck Gun
Two Foam Injection nozzles
Three 2.5 inch play pipe
Six salvage tarps
Hose clamp
Two hydrant gates
Three hose jackets
Two SCBA ranger units
Five SCBA Cylinders
1,5 inch hose
Six pagers
1
e
e
e
Inspection
Pickup Truck
Desk
Total
Civil Defense
Sirens
Streets
Street Sweeper
Shop
Addition to garage
Planning
IBM Computer and software
Total General Fund
Library
Operations
Answering Machine
MacIntosh Computer
Printer for computer
Overhead projector
VCR
Two PAC printers
Paperback spinner
Video spinner
Total
1994 CAPITAL OUTLAY
Requested
Recommended
15,000
400
o
400
$15,400
$400
$13,000
$13,000
$100,000
$50,000
$400,000
o
$4,500
$4,500
$697,620
$401,630
$ 150 $ 150
3,000 0
300 0
360 0
350 350
760 0
555 555
625 625
$6,100 $1,680
$ 350 $ 350
5,000 0
600 0
5,000 2,500
390 390
350 350
2,000 1,000
2,700 0
500 500
700 700
$17 , 590 $5,790
$23,690 $7,470
2
Building
Chair
Margaret Rivers Room furniture
Margaret Rivers Room shades
ADA "modifications"
Fiction room shads
Three chairs
Lighting improvements
Reupholster six chairs
Four heater motors
Electric motors on pumps
Total
Library Total
1994 CAPITAL OUTLAY
e Parks Requested Recommended
Highland Park $40,000 $40,000
Lawn sweeper 12,000 12,000
Lawn tractor 18,000 12,000
Three mowers 1,200 1,200
Computer 2,000 2,000
Fencing at ballfields 1,700 1,700
Pioneer Park blacktop 17,000 17 ,000
Total Parks $91,900 $85,900
Lily Lake
Arena
Computer $2,000 $ 0
Loader 9,500 5,000
Rubber flooring 5,200 0
Metal siding 14,000 0
30,700 5,000
Beach
Picnic area and walkway $31,000 0
Total Lily Lake $61,700 $ 5,000
e Grand Total $874,910 $500,000
e
3
STEVEN DORNFELD
...
Study's results let you see how
cities' spending stacks up
e
e
If you live in Fal-
con Heights,
Lake Elmo or Vad-
nais Heights, you
owe your local
elected officials a
vote of thanks.
They appear to be
demonstrating effi-
ciency and re-
straint in providing
basic services.
But if you live in
South St. Paul, Apple Valley or Rose-
mount, you may have cause for concern.
In those communities, local officials are
spending substantially more than what
may be necessary to meet basic needs.
These conclusions are drawn from a
new study by the governor's Commission
on Reform and Efficiency (CORE),
which spent nearly two
years analyzing local
spending and service
needs. The study is ex-
pected to be published
later this month.
The ultimate product
of the commission's ef-
forts will be a proposal
for anew, needs-based
formula for distributing
state aid to cities. In the past, aid has
been handed out largely on the basis of
past spending, encouraging even greater
spending rather than holding down local
property taxes.
More immediately, however, the com-
mission's study will provide Minnesota
taxpayers with a new valuable tool for
judging whether their elected officials
are being prudent with their use of prop-
erty tax revenues and other resources.
As a draft of the CORE study puts it,
"Minnesota taxpayers are demanding
more accountability from .local officials
for how tax dollars are spent. Account-
ability, however, requires that citizens be
able to ask questions about and evaluate
city spending practices. To evaluate their
city, Minnesota taxpayers need accurate
and understandable information about
how their city's spending compares to
that of other cities."
The CORE study is an effort to fill this
void, and the timing couldn't be better.
Within the next two weeks, Minnesota
homeowners will be receiving their annu-
al "Truth in Taxation" notices, providing
ASSOCIATE
EDITORIAL PAGE
EDITOR
them with a preview of what their 1994
property taxes could be. By the end of
December, all local governments must
conduct public hearings on their proposed
budgets and approve their property tax
levies for next year.
In its study, CORE analyzed the spend-
ing of 181 Minnesota cities with popula-
tions of 2,500 or more during the year
1990, the most recent for which complete
data was available,
Using a combination of factors that
affect the cost and demand for services,
the study determined every community's
basic spending needs for each of five
essential services: streets, police, fire,
parks and recreation, and general admin-
istration. A basic spending level also was
determined for "other" expenditures that
did not fall into these five categories.
However, the study excluded certain
services that are not offered by all cities,
or services provided primarily on a self-
supporting basis. These include ambu-
lance service, economic development,
and housing and redevelopment.
CORE then examined each communi-
ty's actual 1990 spending, and compared
it with their basic service needs.
The results indicate that 8t. Paul city
government may be less wasteful than
some taxpayers have suspected, 8t.
Paul's total spending exceeded its basic
needs by 23 percent. This compares with
39 percent for Minneapolis, 50 percent
for Eveleth, 53 percent for Red Wing, 75
To learn more
. The CORE report on local
!;pending is expected to be i!;sued
by the end of November. For more
information, contact the commis-
sion at (612) 296-7041.
. The Minnesota Taxpayers As-
sociation has published a 41-page
guide to local property taxes. The
price is $3. For more information,
contact the MTA at (612)
224-7477.
. The Citizens League produces
an annual comparison of property
taxes in 95 metro area communI-
ties, and the 27 largest outstate
cities. The price for non.members
is $20. To order, contact the
league at (612) 338-0791.
percent for Two Harbors and 85 percent
for East Grand Forks.
Needless to say, this new statistical
yardstick is likely to be about as wel-
come among local officials as Ross Perot
at a White House dinner.
Roger Peterson, director of legislative
affairs for the Association of Metropoli-
tan Municipalities, complains that mem-
bers of CORE set out "to find a way to
cut state aid to cities as much as they
could" and then devised a system to
achieve that goal.
But John Brandl, a University of Min-
nesota public affairs professor and a for-
mer DFL state senator who served on the
commission, believes it is "as good a job
as has ever been done" to measure local
service needs.
In the past, comparisons of local
spending typically have been done on a
per-capita basis, with no attention to oth-
er factors that affect the cost of police
and fire protection, street maintenance
and other services.
The CORE spending comparisons will
require further analysis to determine
what the percentages mean. For exam.
pie, is Community X wasting money by
exceeding its basic spending need on
street maintenance? Or is it simply re-
sponding to local demands for services?
One obvious conclusion, however, is
that the 35 Minnesota cities with full-
time fire departments are paying the
price.
For example, South St. Paul - with 16
full-time firefighters to serve a suburban
community of 20,000 - is spending 480
percent more for fire protection than
what CORE judges to be its basic need.
West St. Paul and Burnville, two Dakota
County neighbors, also have full-time fire
departments - and they also shoot off
CORE's spending charts.
In contrast, Bloomington ~ Minneso-
ta's third largest city with a population
of 86,000 - manages to provide fire
protection with an all-volunteer depart-
ment. And its spending is within 5 per-
cent of what CORE judges to be the
community's basic need.
The CORE study also suggests that
Ramsey County suburbs that contract
with the county sheriff's department for
police protection appear to be getting a
good deal. Arden Hills, Little Canada,
Nortb Oaks, 8horeview and Vadnais
Heights all are spending far less that
what CORE defines as their basic need
for police services.
Indeed, communities that look for
ways to contract for or share services
with other governmental units appear to
be reaping the rewards.
For example, the Ramsey County sub-
urb of Falcon Heights purchases police
protection from Roseville, buys snow re-
moval service from Ramsey County, and
sells fire and rescue service to Lauder-
Comparison of local spending vs. needs
The Go Commission on Reform and Efficiency determined how much
eac nity should be spending for basic services, and compared that
each community actually is spending. This chart lists the
percentage of spending that is above or below each community's basic needs
as determined by CORE. '
Falcon
Farmington
Forest Lake
Hastings
lnver Grove Hts.
lake Elmo
Lakeville
Little Canada
Mahtomedi
Maplewood
Mendota H
Mounds View
New Brighton
North Oaks
North 51. Paul
Oakdale
Rosemount
oseville
1. Paul Park
Shoreview
South St. Pa
Stillwater
Vadnais Heights
West St. Paul
Whitt1 Bear Lake
o
11
20
-47
1.8
-1.8
-24
15,
14
-15
-7
-59
-35
12
-67
-13
-69
73
15
-28
35
-52
4
54
-2
50
-39
-4
3
-6
32
-1
-81
-64
-20
169
298
74
90
~8
-22
-81
4
13
-82
250
o
97
3
-73
-54
-31
-41
248
-89
-7
65
-90
135
-54
-77
-48
~88
22
-17
3
-25
-79
-9
-43
-32
22
dale. All told, Falcon Heights is spending
39 percent less than what CORE defines
as its basic need for city services.
Jane belage, a state Department of
Administration analyst who worked on
the study, acknowledges that there may
be very logical explanations for why
some communities are spending more
than what CORE has defined as its basic
needs.
PIONEER PRESS GRAPHIC
But she says the CORE comparisons
allow taxpayers to ask, "Are we, or are
we not, getting more for what we are
spending? And is the 'more' worth it?"
To encourage and applaud siate, county and
municipal efforts to revitalize government, mak.
ing it more efficient and more responsive to
citizens' needs, is one the 1993 "What It
Takes" initiatives of the Pione~r Press Editorial
Board.
e
e
e
LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC.
MINNESOTA OFFICE:
P.O. Box 2181
StUlwater,MN 65082
(612) 489-7681
Fax (612) 480-9561
WASHlNGTON OFFICE:
7920 Towerbell Court
A.nnandale, VA 22008
708) 660-7129
Fax (703) 660-4632
November 16, 1993
To: Mayor and Council Members
City of Stilf~ 0
From: Ed Cain, LA~
Subject: Report on South HiU Sewer Project Funding
In response to direction from the Mayor and Council, I have looked into outside
funding to ameliorate the costs of the Southeast Sewer Project to the citizens living in
that area. The information presented in this report involved the following procedures:
1, Examination of documents including:
* "Report on Utilities and Street Improvements: The City of Stillwater, MN,
SEH Engineering, February 23, 1970;
* "Needs Assessment for Community Development," SEH Engineering,
Jan, 10, 1989;
* "Feasibility Study: Southeast Area Sanitary Sewer, Water main,
Drainage, and Streets," SEH Engineering, May 18, 1993,
* "The Community Development Applications Manual," State of Minnesota,
"Small Cities Development Program," and the "Public Facilities
Authority," and other Federal and State publications;
*
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, pages 579-642, as amended,
2, Meetings and discussions with the Governor's Office, key Legislators, State
and Federal officials, City Engineer Dick Moore, and others,
3. Meetings and discussions with home owners from the Southeast Area,
Based on information received from these sources, the following findings and
recommendations are submitted to the Council for your consideration,
Page 2 - LAI Report; SE Sewer Project.
e
The Problem:
The Mayor and City Council is very much aware of the problems facing the City
and the residents, The sewer projects for both the North and South Hill areas have
been delayed for years because of the costs involved in extending the sewer system,
as a result of the topography of the area, The problem is exacerbated further by the
diversity of home values served with the sewer system expansion, and the
socioeconomic differences within the area, Hook-up costs, and assessments will be
constant irrespective of the value of the homes served by the system, The removal of
septic systems atter construction and hook-up will be another significant cost to the
residents,
Secondly, the growth of the City has created additional demands on the storm
sewer system, Blacktopping of areas, new home construction, and commercial growth
has caused excessive run-off through the natural ravines and gullies, resulting in
serious erosion in certain areas of the City, This condition has demanded immediate
action,
e
Thirdly, the Mayor and Council should be commended for moving aggressively
on the repair and improvement of the City's infrastructure, and the constryction of the
levee wall system, both of which had reached the critical stage, The Council had little
choice but to move forward on the reconstruction of the infrastructure of downtown
Stillwater, and even less of choice in responding to the deterioration of the levee wall
system, Even with $2,6 million in Federal and State assistance on the levee, and tax
increment financing of the downtown repairs, there will still be some costs to the
citizens,
The North and South Hill sewer projects, the Myrtle Street storm sewer
construction, and new road construction all require bonding and assessments that will
increase the pressures on the City budget and the taxpayers, It is vital that the Council
structure these projects in such a way to maximize the opportunity for receiving
Federal and State assistance for the City and the citizens wherever and whenever
possible,
Funding Availability:
There are funding programs which can assist both the City, and the area
residents, by reducing the costs of this project. While some sources are competitive
grants, others are available by structuring the proposals in such a way that they meet
the criteria established in the rules and regulations for the programs,
The success in acquiring funds will depend on:
1. How the projects are structured;
e
Page 3 - LAI Report: SE Sewer Project
e 2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
How the projects are presented to the funding agencies;
The demonstrated financial needs of the City and the citizens;
The health, safety, and environmental concerns of the project;
The relationships established with the decision-makers in the agencies;
The timing of the applications in accordance with the availability of funds;
The sequence of actions by the City in moving the project forward;
8, The commitment of the City to the acquisition of funds;
Recommendations:
Currently, three necessary projects are on the drawing boards for the City, The
sanitary sewer projects on the North and South Hills, and the storm sewer project
required to abate the erosion in the Myrtle Street area, Funding for all of these
projects should be approached simultaneously, They support each other,
e
1, No action should be taken by the Council regarding the awarding of bids
until all funding options have been fully examined.
2, No action should be taken by the Council regarding the financing of these
projects until all funding options have been futly examined,
3, The Southeast and North Hill sewer projects should be divided into phases
for bidding purposes to provide the best possible ratio of low and moderate
income families, (This will require some engineering work to assure that the
project division makes sense from the technical standpoint.)
4, A house-to-house survey is needed to assure that aU LMI households are
included,
3, Funding for the sewer projects, and any other projects planned, should
be incorporated into a single application at the outset. This will provide more
funding options for the City, strengthen the need factor, and increase the
opportunities for receiving assistance,
4, A basic proposal document must be prepared,
5, Follow up of the meetings with the State and Federal officials contacted in
this feasibility report,
e
e Page 4 - LAI Report; SE Sewer Project.
6, Frequent reporting to the Council to allow the projects to move forward as
quickly as possible, and providing the Council with information to enable them
to make sound decisions,
7, Legislative action is another option available in the 1994 session, however, it
is imperative that all program sources be exhausted before a legislative effort is
undertaken, To bring a good case before the State Legislature, it has to be
"case of last resort,"
Summary:
If directed by the Council, I will approach the project from a multiple grant
funding process, That is, I will be working for funds that will lower the tax assessment,
and possible assist in hook-up costs for the residents, and funds that reduce the City's
share of the project costs, Since the City's cost in the project is shared by all
taxpayers, many households will benefit. Different funding sources, have different time
frames, and procedures for application, Consequently, this will permit the Council to
make future decisions based on the results of the efforts,
e
Time is extremely important. If the decision is delayed to seek funds, certain
funding options will not be available, I will be available to respond to any questions
you may have,
e
",.
e
..e
;'..',. ".
e
J
?(y
November 28, 1993
Mr. Charles Hooley, Mayor
stillwater city Hall
210 North 4th street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor Hooley,
The Palmers believe it is time to prepare stillwater's Lowell Inn for
the next millenium. The first step is to complete two key projects.
First, is the repair and renovation of the building parallel with a
major equipment replacement/updating program. Second,is a city-backed,
refinancing plan including the sale-leaseback of the Lowell Inn parking
lot. The objective of refinancing. is to lower both the capital costs
and. operational .costs of the core business mix...at the present level
of consolidated revenues.
-, '.~, - . . ", : , ' <',---' ,/--<
','Centralto /this'firststep...is the full .faith'. and. credit' of <the City of
stillwater being.behind:thesetwo.projectsiincll.1dinga'vital,associated
refinancing of the entire property. This can be accomplished by either,
or a combinationof,( i )oissuanceof ci tybonds, and/ or (i i ) city's
guarantee of priv(lte financing--either or both of the foregoing
incorporating the sale-leaseback.. ". Thg. following outlines use of funds
and cash requirements : '., .
"_ .... ,'0 ',', _0 ,
,-"....'-.... ........ -",'..-,
'.- ,': '" '-','
. USE OF FUNDS
-;'",i.'i_"';'"
'" ,......-.....,....,.,
, ',.. "':,":--':':""'\,-,">---""
Buyout of Semper-Lowell . sale-leaseback option . . '.
Building/Equipment Refurbishing and Replacement
Working Capital ,l"ood/Beverage/Lodging Operations
Purchase and Leaseback of Lowell Inn Parking Lot
. $ 2,250,000
600,000
0,000
0,000
TOTAL
. $ 3,250,000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less:
Reinvestment of Parking Lot Sale Proceeds
(250,000)
CASH REQUIREMENTS . .
.. $ .3,000,000
. . . . . . .
There are key reasons.why financial backing for the Lowell Inn by the
City of stillwater is essential to this first step. These reasons
can be considered in the pUblic interest and, consequently, should be
supportive of the common good of the stillwater community as a whole.
First and foremost is the intrinsic value of this historic property to
the city. Second, the public value of the consistent, traditional style
of Lowell Inn hospitality operations. Third, the city's future role in
serving the "speci:'.l occasion" market subsegment within and for the
seven-county metropolitan' area.
102 North Second Street . Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Tel: 612-439-1100 · Bus, Off: 612-439-1102 · Fax: 612-439-4686
"IJQ!i3
I
1.
Page -2
...
,
':"<.:.'t:',,:--.., ,':i
TOgether,?'tl1ese''\Ial~~~;'lrepresent .the unique institutional .vaTue of .
the public functionan~ impressive presence of the Lowell Inn
facility. This is av lue derived solely from location, twenty-four
hour, year-around... avai ability to the public and widespread recognit-
ion of itsrespectedP.esence in the region's most historic city.
This proposalPrOVides~the opportunity for our city council to
determine the extent t which this special legacy deserves committed
care, d",dicatedattent'on arid extraordinary access to public resources.
It is therefore unders ood the following may be among a variety of
important consideratio s by the City Council:
1. That the Palm rsare cO~1mitted to, (i) the transition from
second-generatipntot ird-generation management, (ii) the continuance
of the class and style. of operation enabling the Lowell Inn to survive
cyclical national, reg.onal and local economic downturns, and (iii)
prosper within ,the fra ework of the competitive, over-built,
hospitality marketplac of our seven-county metropolitan area.
2. .... '.. >.Tl:1atth~pres
style forfuture.gener
. ......cruciaL.toconsiderati
. .
:.-.':.....'....':.'i. ,'" ',"
~.'.,' 3.. , . ...'...That reconstr
hotel 'properties onna
few exceptions,. the.no
rvation of both the facility and hospitality
tions of local and regional citizens may be
ns stimulated by this proposal.
:1" ..,' ......,
I'
dt.i.on '. of/oldhotels'clhdrefurbishing of existing
ionalandregionallevelshas replaced, with
well-known risks of new hotel construction.
e
',' ':., , .. .,..:-...:.:.'.....<.'.',..'..:->'.:. :....:..-.....," "-', ',....'." ,.... "',
, 4." . ....'. .', '.' That, forove
" , >. the community. an aggre
employment base .,for '.uP
.. ., being am()ngthe.' larges
full-time 'employer in
....,....'--,.',.'".
.. .'.-',."".,', :".......'.
,..'..:...... ',", .-- >
six decades, the Lowell Inn has delivered to
at~basePClyrollin .excess of $30,000,000 and
t() 90.full and part-time employ~es... therefore,
,<if. not presently the largest, "remaining ,
he downtown business district.
,- .-; :'::,,;"\'<:":';,::,-:-::;-:,::':;'>:-,,:',J:-'-_u',,_',' ,,'
S.'\;.';That,theLow-e lInn bears the. name of the first among
Stillw;t:er'~<In();e;tiprol.lfiC and generous benefactors.
. .......That . the 'initi!.al Lowell Inn building project in 1926, was
priva.telY fund.ed (no d1'bt) from the combined contributions of Sawyer
Hous~ land from Elmore Lowell and public stock sales to individuals.
7. . That the fina Icial record, and resulting indication of future
economic .prospects, ea h demonstrate both stability of revenues and
continuity of operatin expense ratios over a twenty-year period.
8. That the city will assume minimum risk for any initial, and all
future, carrying costs resulting from city financing and sale leaseback.
9. . And finally,
existing business (wit
prove that our city of
balancing of city, cap
desired to continue to
Stillwater's downtown
hat the commitment of city resources to an
a 63-year record of successful operation) will
icials are willing and able to execute a rare
tal resource priorities--between that which is
exist and that which is proposed to exist--in
usiness district.
e
#~
,
e
You, or other members of the City Council and city staff, may contact
me personally for discussion and consultations regarding the economics
and financial status of the present operations of the Lowell Inn or
any other purpose required by council deliberations in this matter.
Your prompt consideration and favorable disposition of this important
proposal, prior to January 31st 1994, will be greatly appreciated so
that we are in a position to proceed with the additional steps.
sincerely,
e
Council Members; Bodlovick, cummings, Funke and Kimble
Mr. Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
Mr. David Magnuson, City Attorney
cityN03.GVl-181
cc:
~
LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC.
e.
tfJ
MINNESOTA OFFICE:
P,O. Box 2131
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 439-7681
Fax (612] 430-9561
-C:r f.T,I'~ y
WASHINGTON OP'P'ICB:
7920 Towerbell Court
Annandale. VA 22003
703] 560-7129
Fax (103] 560-4632 .. :.~~'=i~~
~{"'. ..' ...~~.~;:::;~~.
.~r-
o. ....--~~-~
..~
November 30,1993
~ 'H~ ::':.~:;=~~~
~~~"~ ~:.~~~
.-~;:~;".~'!..~:,
.. .-,,",,,,,
To: Mayor and Council Members
City of Stillwater
From: Ed Cain
Legislative Associates, Inc.
, .. .-.- .~-=--
Re: Proposal for Government Relations Services for the City of Stillwater by
Legislative Associates, Inc. '.
-. . .,' ,...--
. .~- ....-...-......... ~
....-.. -;,.:.- ,7.~'.
.. .,-...,;_c "___:___:. ._:.._:,,:-,~..:_.....
- - ..... ......__ - '0
.__r,J"I_--:!'~'
. ......-..-.--...---
- '.... .:~.=.~,
. . .-.... ..:--........r.;...
-". .._.-.:-:--"'-:.......::..'~..
. '-":-:.-'-~~
- '. . - . .
e
. _..- . -.
- .- ~->,~.~:~2:t~~. - -.
There are four issues or projects before the City CouncH that need to be .,. :-,.:m~~-_:~~ig~
addressed in this proposal. Each has the potential for attracting outside.resources to*~~~~
defray the costs to the City and the residents, thus reducing the cost to the taxpayers.~~,:,,~. -=._,,-~;~=:.
'..~'::;:
~~.'T.:.~~~-
1. State Levee Funding: While the State approved $200,000 in the 1993 -=-._'-~~~:2;:.j~':'~..
Legislative Session, their decision was to postpone action on the remaining $200,OOO,~}~5~:?E"~
requested until the 1994 Legislative Session. Because of a variety of roadblocks, the ..:.::,:::.;:, :~ .
1993 funding was not approved until the last day of the session. Work with the State,_~-:":-~;'~~
the Governor's Office (and budget people), and the Legislature must begin ~ .:-::~~:fi?'ii;;~i
immediately to improve our chances for obtaining the additional State matching funds .", '.:: .;;::~~:~
for the levee construction. . -
2. South Hill Sewer Project: The South Hill Sewer Project is expected to cost '.~
about $1.4 million. The citizens in the project area will be responsible for both the
assessments and hook-up costs. Even though the City is spreading half the cost
among all the taxpayers, there will be some of the area residents who will be placed in
a very serious financial situation as the result of this double hit. Funds are available to
help defray these costs for the citizens if a proper foundation is laid, if the project is
correctly approached and presented, and if continuous follow-up is maintained.
3. North Hill Sewer Project: An earlier start on this project will open the doors for
additional funding that has the potential of decreasing the cost to the City as well as to
the citizens in the project area. It is estimated that the cost of the North Hill Project will
be similar to the South Hill Project, or about $1.5 million. A slightly different
socioeconomic structure for the South Hill area may help the process. It is likely that I
will combine these two projects in some funding approaches.
_ i
e
"I.
. .' -~~ .,.,.~ ',':-: ':'''-;-''.~ I '
._._"" .~~..~~t~'
:;:. :::~~~f*~
. ''':.1,j;~ 0:-.:.. ~-~j
..":.:.....,-.-:~:.'.~~t~-::;u~.
.
, I
. .
r
4, Levee Reconstruction ~roject Negotiations and Follow-up: The
nf egdotiationsblwitth tbhe Corpd s o~ En~ineerStWiltl, b,et Critbical dto ~ow tthhe $2.4 mifllithon fed~ectral ." ~~ C' .~..~e
un s are a e 0 e use . Tfiere IS a po en la or roa emng e scope 0 e pro! t .~. :~~.' c_~...".
and to increase the funding by $600,000 if the procedure is properly executed. My:.'~':.c:~;;~ '?~i. -
background on the project wit~ the Corps in Washington, and with the Appropriation~.gi2~~;.~~,,~,.:,t
Committee~ can be used in structUring the use of the funds... ' -'~'-'~~~:~J~ "~.
5. Other projects and Ser ices: In addition to these four projects, the Mayor or ~:2:;s:):~~:,:-'~
Council members may find ot er areas in which funds are needed for specific projects ".
for the City, I would be avail ble for investigating funding sources, and preparing"' .,..'
proposals, if needed. Most i portant, in representing the City in the many different
facets of government, I have t e opportunity to hear about new funding sources, or . . ". . '
programs where the available, funds have not been fully used. This information can be -:::?~--:::_~~''?i~
. I . ,~_'''''''' .,.
very helpful to a progressive f1t1ayor and Council, dedicated to the growth and ~." _ c."~~~:-"'2~.':'c';r~
~~~~;;ment of the City, butt a real concern about the expenditure of IOcaltlx ...'}~~~~t1
Funding Potential for Projects: In reviewing potential funding sources:the-2-r~~~r"~ ;~~;;
projects described in this pro~osaJ can generate from $1.5 to $2.2 million dollars for,.~~.t~-
the, City a~d, the reSi~e.nts. ~~i1e there is no guarantee in the funding process,l L~.:-._",.:....;.
beheve this IS a reahstlc estm1ate.. . . '. .~';:;;:{..:..<;;i;-
~;;~~~,~~a~~oe::~~ ;~;:~~t~e ~i: ~~~:~:e~~e~; ;;~~~~~1~~:m~~t:i~~~. ."
:OIlOWi~o;~,~;;;~~ ;I;;:~~;~~~~:i::~ each month ror the n~ 1~~;;~.~1
, .
...,.:......:c
2. Additional hours sp nt in the service of the City be reimbursed at the rate of
$65 per hour, not to ex eed $2,200 per month, except during the period
between January and ay when the Legislature traditionally meets; the
maximum would be in reased to $2,800 per month.
3. Business expenses will be reimbursed, but not to not to exceed $100 per
month, unless prior ap roval is given.
I ,
Reporting: LAI will provide ~oth written reports, and oral reports, as requested by
the Mayor and Council on SP'filic progress of the efforts. Any major or controversial
decision will be brought to th, Mayor and Council for direction. . .
-"\": ""
. t
~.
J
.,.....-.
.....:...... - . ,"-'.. ....~;..J-J'
'.' {~'.:S!E~~~~~..iJ: ..~i~::~..~
~,-"f<< ..........v._ ..I~"'~ ..1.1.,1 ..."",.:
, ;,{~
~. , ,
.- '. J.... '~
~ , ...,.: '.. ;..
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
RAYMOND W. KIRCHNER. SRPA. SRA
Senior Real Property Appraiser
1923 South Greeley Street. Stillwater, MN 55082. (612) 439-3900
FAX: (612) 439-8977
November 16, 1993
Mr. Dave Magnuson
City of Stillwater
324 South Main Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
RE: Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Magnuson:
In accordance with your request, I have inspected and hereby
submit an appraisal report on the above referenced property,
legally described as set forth in the text of the appraisal
report.
The property is a triangular shaped piece of vacant land
containing 9,975 square feet located on South Main Street in
downtown Stillwater.
After careful analysis of the property, I have concluded that as
of November 15, 1993 the market value of the land, excluding
improvements thereon, is $14,700. The estimated reasonable
purchase price with buyer assuming assessments is:
ELEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS
($11,700)
Your attention is called to the accompanying report which
describes the property, area and market conditions and sets forth
my analysis in arriving at a value conclusion.
NOTE: This praisal cannot be fully understood unless the
.--
Assumpti9flS and Limitations are read in their entirety.
----...,
ay d W. Kirchner, SRA/SRPA
Certified General License #4000780
R. W Kirchner & f!ssociates
I
~
e
INDEX
SUMMARY OF SALIENT FAfTS AND
APPRAISER'S CERTIFICArION
PURPOSE OF THE APPRAI6AL. .
CONCLUSION .
. 1
. 2
. . 3
,
SCOPE OF THE APPRAISA~. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 4
ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESfRIPTION . . . . . . .
ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATED rARKET VALUE AND TAXES.
Z.ONING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
4
. 4
HISTORY .
. 4
TWIN CITIES METROPOLIWAN DATA. . . ,. .
I
STILLWATER~ OAK PARK ~EIGHTS, BAYPORT AREA DATA
I
DESCRIPTION OF PROPER Y . . . . . . . .
. . 5-7
.8-10
e
. . .11
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROV MENTS .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. 11-12
SUBJECT PICTURES. . .
. . . . 13-14
DEFINITION OF HIGHEST AND BEST USE. .
. . .15
LAND VALUATION.
. . . 16-21
IMCOME APPROACH .
. . . . . . . . . . .
.22
LAND LEASE VALUE. .
. .22
CORRELATION AND VALUE CONCLUSION.
. .23
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMIT TIONS OF APPRAISAL.
I
QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER . . . .
. 24-30
. . . . 31-33
MAPS. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . 34-36
e
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Location
Present Owner
Site Area
Improvements
Highest & Best Use
Zoning
Land Value Estimate by the Direct
Sales Comparison Approach
Land Value Estimate by
the Income Approach
Land Value Estimate by
the Cost Approach
Reconciled Estimated Value
of the land
Appraiser
Date of Appraisal
xxx South Main Street
Stillwater, Minnesota
State of Minnesota
9,975 Square Feet
Land Only
Commercial/Park
Public Administration
$ 10,000
$ 14,700
Not Applicable
$ 14,700
Raymond W. Kirchner, SRA/SRPA
November 15, 1993
1
R. W Kirchner & }4.ssociates
I
I
I
i
~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
A PRAISER'S CERTIFICATION
I, Raymond W. Kirchper, do hereby certify to the best of my
knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this
report are true and orrect. The reported analyses, opinions,
and conclusions are imited only by the reported assumptions and
limiting conditions, and are personal, unbiased professional
analyses, opinions a d conclusions. I have no present or pro-
spective interest i the property that is the subject of this
report, and I have n personal interest or bias with respect to
the parties involved My compensation is not contingent on an
action or event resul ing from the analyses, opinions, or conclu-
sions in, or the use of, this report. My analyses, opinions and
conclusions were deve oped, and this report has been prepared, in
conformity with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of
Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute and the Apprais-
al Standards Board.
No one provided sign'ficant professional assistance to me in the
preparation of this r port
The use of this rep rt is subject to the requirements of the
Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized
representatives.
I have made a perso al inspection of the property that is the
subject of this repor It is my opinion that as of November 15,
1993, the fair market value of the subj ect/l-aiid'~s $14 700
/ -~._--~---2'
/,----- / /- ,
/' /./ - "-' '
'J'// >'/ / "v<- S
d--- .c>//
l--> :._
aymond W. Kirchner, SRA/SRPA
Cert. General License #4000780
2
e
e
)
,/
e
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
-~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL
The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the fee simple fair
market value of the real estate described herein for purposes of
determining a purchase amount.
Market value is defined as the most probable price which a
property should bring in a competitive and open market under all
conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each
acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not
affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the
consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of
title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer
and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well
informed or well advised; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for
exposure in the open market; and acting in what they consider
their best interest; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in
U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable
thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration
for the property sold unaffected by special or creative
financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated
with the sale.
Note: Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice; Ap-
praisal Standards Board; dated 1993.
3
R. WKirchner & {lssociates
I
I
I
I
-~
e
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL
,
It is my understandi~g that the report will be used for purposes
of determining a p rchase price to be used by the City of
Stillwater in purchasing the property from the State of
Minnesota.
Because the proper y is vacant land, I have employed the
traditional approac to value, i.e., direct sales comparison
approach and income ~proach' and have collected data sufficient
and to the extent ava'lable to arrive at a value conclusion. The
cost approach was considered inappropriate and unre1iab1e and was
not used. I
I
ADrRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The subject is loca ed on South Main Street (Highway #95) in ..
Stillwater, Minnesot and is legally described as: ..
Lots 32, 33 and 34, Block 42, Original Town (now City)
of Stillwater, ccording to the plat thereof on file
and of record i the office of the County Recorder in
and for Washing on County, Minnesota.
ASSESSOR' ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AND TAXES
Taxes payable in 199 are exempt.
ZONING
The property is zone Public Administration.
HISTORY
The property
Transportation.
is fl wned by the
It as purchased by
I
I 4
I
I
Minnesota Department
them in 1932.
of
e
R. ~ Kirchner & Associates
~~
e
TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN DATA
This eleven county area (Anoka, Carver,Chisago, Dakota,
Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington and Wright Counties
in Minnesota and st. Croix County in Wisconsin) constitutes the
region influencing the subject property. located generally at
the confluence of the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers, in
Southeast Minnesota, it is the major metropolitan focal point of
the Upper Midwest.
While the cities of Minneapolis (population 358,166) and st. Paul
(population 267,968) are the dominant political subdivisions, the
area is also partially governed by the Metropolitan Council, a
form of regional government with responsibility for common area
problems such s public transit, utilities, distribution, etc.
e
The Twin Cities is growing faster than any other northern
metropolitan area east of the Rocky Mountains. It ranks
sixteenth in size of the nation's twenty-five largest
metropolitan areas. The population of the metropolitan area was
estimated at 2,464,124 persons on April 1, 1990. Growth has been
characterized by consistency rather than rapidity. According to
the Metropolitan Council Data Center, the'1990 estimated
population is 2,464,124 and increase of 15.3% since 1980.
The Twin Cities has many more large headquarters companies than
metropolitan areas of comparable size. The area ranks seventh
nationally compared with other metropolitan areas. There are
some 2,500 manufacturers based in the area including Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing, General Mills, Pillsbury, Cargill,
Control Data Corporation, Northwest Airlines, Land O'Lakes, Brown
& Bigelow, West Publishing, Munsingwear, Clay Research, and st.
Judes. Other manufacturers include International Harvester, Ford
Motors Parts Division, General Electric, DuPont, John Deere, and
a cross section of many other national firms.
e
The Twin Cities are, in addition, the financial center of the
Upper Midwest. The largest commercial banks are the First Bank
System, and the Norwest Banks. Minneapolis is the headquarters
of several billion-dollar savings and loan associations including
Twin City Federal & Midwest Federal; five large insurance
companies including Northwestern National Life, Lutheran
Brotherhood, Western Life, st. Paul Insurance Companies, and
Minnesota Mutual Life together with smaller companies have their
home offices in the Twin Cities. In addition, the Twin Cities
~nclude Prudential Insurance Company's Regional Office and
numerous branch offices of other insurance companies. Investors
Diversified Services (I.D.S.) anchors downtown Minneapolis in the
I.D.S. Tower.
5
~
R. W Kirchner & ~ssociates
The Twin Cities Metro olitan Area has traditionally enjoyed a low
unemployment r~te. The unemployment rate as of June 1993 is
4.9%.
The Twin Cities have
by the University of
in the United state
students on its four
attention through it
relationship with the
an excellent educational system highlighted
Minnesota, now the third largest university
, with an enrollment of 50,000 full-time
campuses. The Medical College has gained
Medical Center, Heart Hospital, and close
Mayo Clinic.
Ranking in quality, although not in size with University, are
Macalester College, Augsburg College, College of st. Thomas,
Hamline College, and t. Catherine College.
The diversificatio of the Twin Cities' economy is greatly
enhanced by its bein surrounded by an in a primary position to
serve a vast and rich agricultural region of the United states.
Culturally, the Twin Cities supports two area museums, a science
museum, two zoos, the Minnesota Symphony Orchestra, several civic
theaters, a host of libraries, and Tyrone Guthrie Repertory
Theater. ,
The Twin Cities hav~ become the sport sports capitol of the
Midwest with the Mirnesota Vikings of the National Football
League, the Minnesot Twins of the American Baseball League, the
Minnesota North Sta s of the National Hockey League, and the
Timber Wolves of the National Basketball Association.
Additionally, year.r und participant sports are easily available
to all residents wi hin the Metropolitan Area because of many
lakes, ski resorts, .hunting and fishing areas wi thin close
proximity, and extens,'ve public park systems.
i
In conclusion, the eqonomic climate in the Twin Cities is excel-
lent. The area con~inues to experience a broad and healthy
growth based upon a well-diversified economy, coupled with an
enlightened public an governmental climate.
6
e
e
Upper
e
~
R. W Kirchner & Associates
e
Based on U.S. Census Data is complied by the Metropolitan Council
the following is a base synopsis of the Twin City Area ranking
and how it compares to other metropolitan areas.
INCOME
Median household income:
POVERTY
% living below poverty line:
1. Hartford, Conn. $48,771
2. Washington D.C. $46,884
3. San Francisco $41,459
1. Washington D.C.
2. Hartford
3. Boston
7. Twin Cities
$36,565
3. Twin Cities(tie) 8.1%
37. San Antonio, TX $26,092
38. Tampa-St. P, FL $26,036
39. New Orleans $24,442
MORTGAGE
Average monthly payment:
1. San Francisco $1,234
e 2. New York $1,192
3. Washington D.C. $1,147
20. Twin Cities $ 820
37. San Antonio $ 653
38. Indianapolis $ 650
39. Pittsburgh $ 643
JOBS
% of adults in labor force:
1. Washington D.C. 75.3%
2. Twin Cities 74.3%
3. Atlanta, Dallas,
Denver (tie) 73.0%
37. New Orleans 62.0%
38. Tampa-St. Peter 58.1%
39. Pittsburgh 58.0%
37. Houston
38. San Antonio
39. New Orleans
6.4%
7.1%
8.1%
14.9%
19.5%
21.1%
RENT
~verage monthly payment:
1. San Francisco $690
2. Washington D.C. $667
3. Los Angeles $646
17. Twin Cities
37. Salt Lake City
38. Cincinnati, OH
39. Pittsburgh
e
7
$479
$378
$374
$363
R. ~ Kirchner & .Associates
i
i
I
STILLWATER - OAK PARK HEIGHTS - BAYPORT AREA DATA
i
I
The city of Stillwatsr, the county seat of Washington County, is
located on the SlOPi~9 hills of the west bank of the st. Croix
River, a nationally nown scenic and recreational area. The st.
Croix River forms the eastern city limits and also the borderline
for the neighboring state of Wisconsin. The city lies just east
of the Twin Cities A ea and is approximately twenty miles from
downtown st. Paul. Although Stillwater is fast becoming an
integral part of the win Cities suburban area, it has a distinct
identity of its own.
e
Stillwater is one of the oldest cities in the Northwest. It is
steeped in the histo ical tradition of an early river town. It
was the first town si e of Minnesota and was settled in 1843 when
a group of young busi essmen established the first sawmill. From
that time, Stillwat r grew rapidly owing its existence to the
lumber business. In 1848, delegates assembled in Stillwater to
hold the first Min esota Territorial Convention. At this
convention, the name of Minnesota was decided on and a petition
was drawn up memori lizing Congress to set up a Territorial
Government. Stillw ter became recognized as the spot where ..
Minnesota was born. ~
The town was incorp rated in 1854 and grew in size to 12,318
people in 1900. town's primary existence was lumbering, but
it was also import an as a port city in the steamboat days. As
the lumbering indus ry declined, so did the town. In 1940,
Stillwater had a pop lation of 7,013. Since then, the city grew
from 8,310 in 1960 0 12,290 in 1980. During the 1980's, the
city grew roughly 13% to an estimated 1990 population of 13,882.
Adjusting for infla ion, i.e., income stated in terms of 1989
Dollars, Stillwate had a 1989 median household income of
$42,244, an increas of 3.1% over the past 10 years, giving
Stillwater a rankin of 111 out of 192 communities in the 7
county metropolitan area. Source: U.S. Census. However, the
surrounding township in Washington County and western Wisconsin
~ave seen a more dra~atic increase in both population and medium
~ncome . I
Stillwater was al lays closely linked with st. Paul and
Minneapolis by trans ortation. During the early history, rail
and steamers were th main elements of transportation. During
the first half of th Twentieth Century, trolley cars provided
regular service be ween st. Paul and Stillwater. Today,
Minnesota State High ays #95, #96 and #36 converge at Stillwater
and provide easy acceis to the Metropolitan Area. ~
I
8
e
e
e
R. ~ Kirchner & Associates
stillwater is served by the Metropolitan Transit buses. Driving
time to downtown st. Paul and the 3M Headquarters in Maplewood,
via freeway is approximately twenty to thirty minutes. There is
a local bus and local taxi company with radio equipped vehicles.
The main street and business area of the city are located
relatively close to the river with steep hills sloping upward.
About half of the area in the corporate limits of the city is
located on the high bluffs which parallels the st. Croix River,
affording unusually attractive residential areas. Zoning
ordinances and complete building codes and inspection are in
effect in the city.
The downtown area is old, congested and lacks adequate parking;
but it has many major stores and numerous miscellaneous shops.
The area is served by an excellent school district which has
seven elementary schools, two junior high schools and a new
senior high sch school. There is also one parochial elementary
school.
Much of the recent development has' been on the western edge of
the community and along Minnesota Highway #36. The western edge
of the city has experience large scale residential subdivision
including two golf courses and roughly five hundred residential
lots. Recently built homes have generally been in the $130,000
to $300,000 price range with some higher.
The commercial development has been concentrated along Highway
#36 including numerous restaurants, retail space, four banking
facilities, Cub Foods, Walmart, lumber yard, office buildings,
motels and automobile repair and service facilities.
Construction is due to start soon on a new Cub store and Target.
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
Stillwater's southern boundary is formed by Oak Park Heights,
which forms a continuous urban link with Bayport, located three
miles to the south. Oak Park Heights has a large Northern States
Power plant which provides a large portion of school taxes for
the area. There is a modern shopping mall off State Highway #36.
Oak Park Heights had a 1980 population of 2,591. The estimated
1990 population was 3,486 an increase of 34.5%. Median household
incomes stayed relatively stable.
9
R. W Kirchner & J(!ssociates
BAYPORT
tit
I
Bayport is a prbspe~ous manufacturing community. Andersen
Windows, the largest anufacturer of wood windows in the world is
located there. Bayp rt had a 1990 population of about 3,200 an
increase of 9% over ~980. However, median household income
increased by 4.7% to 141,388. Source: U.S. Census.
Desirability of the a~ea is due to: .
1.
I
Easy access tol both downtown st. Paul and Minneapolis.
3M Headquart er~ and Research Center 1'n Maplewood is 15
miles southeas of Stillwater.
Rolling, sceni countryside with numerous lakes.
Historical chaLacter of Sti1~water's downtown area and
older resident~al area.
st. Croix scenkc National Riverway flO~S through the area.
Major metropol~tan recreation area.
New shopp~'ng crnter - numerous restaurants and retail
stores along n w commercial strip on Highway #36.
Major regional shopping center in Maplewood.
I
e
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Excellent Scho 1 District.
e
10
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The property is located on South Main Street (Minnesota Highways
95 & 36) in downtown Stillwater just south of the Central
Business District. It is a triangular shaped parcel of land with
roughly 210 feet of frontage on South Main Street and a depth of
95'. Area is 9,975 square'feet, more or less.
The property is served with all utilities including bituminous
street, concrete curb, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, gas and
electric services.
Soils consist of shallow deposits over limestone formations.
Soils are assumed to be of a stable'nature.
The topography is steep and very little of the site is usable. A
70 foot to 100 foot stone cliff splits the site leaving a small
usable area below the cliff. Roughly 40% or 4,000 square feet is
located below the cliff face. Much of the 4,000 square foot area
below the face of the cliff has less than 20 feet of relatively
level topography between the street right-of-way and the face of
the cliff. It is difficult to see how the frontage area with
less than 20 feet from right-of-way to cliff face could be
economically used and still provide for proper drainage and air
circulation between the face of the cliff and any prospective
building. If the portion of the site lacking adequate depth
between the street right-of-way and the cliff excluded, all that
is usable below the bluff is a 2,000 square foot site.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
The subject property is a mostly vacant site that serves an
aesthetic role in Stillwater's CBD approach. Vittorio's
Restaurant has been leasing 3,504 square feet of land (Parcel 30)
and may have inadvertently encroached on existing R/W with
improvements for its Cave Tour concession. It is this
appraiser's assumption that Lessee's improvements will be removed
at the expiration of the lease and are not considered in this
report.
11
R. W Kirchner &
ssociates
~
e
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
The following impro ements are associated with the Vittorio's
Cave Tours concessio~, located at 420 South Main Street, and are
considered to be t~e private property of the Lessee. They
encroach the subjec 's developable T.H. 95 frontage and are
considered to be enc mber the existing Mn/DOT R/W (Parcels 29a
and 30). The Lessee~nd~cated that C~~ s~er and water (Water &
Sewer assessments unrecorded) serve the concession building and
metered gas and e'lectrical service was observed. All
improvements are con idered to be in average condition.
10' x 20' Concession
A 1930's era lean-t 'structure serves as the main entrance to
Vi ttorio' s Cave Tours concession.' The 8' building height is
comprised of a 3' hi~h limestone wall (w/concrete cap) supporting ..
a wooden timber fram and roof joists. A split-pine siding and ,.,
several fixed-pane windows complete the wall treatment. A
concession window nd the Cave Tour's wooden entry door are
located in the south,ast corner of the 260 square foot building.
The wooden shake roof has a steel-frame temporary sign mounted
illegally on its op (See Sign Regulations in Addendum).
Personal property wi hin includes a stainless steel double sink,
counters and open ca inets. No evidence of gas cooking or heat
was evident in the b ilding.
20' x 50' Wooden Dec.
i
A 1980's era treatei wood deck (with 7 foot wooden landing) is
located adjacent to the concession building on its South. The
approximate 1.000 sq are foot deck is used for an outdoor eating
area. The South lin of the deck's 3 foot high wooden railing is
developed as a bench and serves with wooden picnic tables to
provide an aesthetic area for Tour patrons.
Note: A brass pIa ue commemorating the 1937 National Youth
Project, which deve oped the South Broadway Street steps and a
large area adjacent 0 the subject's rock bluff, is located near
the deck. Several Otd barrels and wrought iron pieces are placed
near a small pond t at has been constructed by the Lessee. A 1
1/2' high retaining all (9" x 9" timbers supports the deck's 50'
frontage along sou~h Main Street and continues south for a
combined total wall etaining wall length of 135 linear feet.
e
12
-~
R. W Kirchner & Associates
e
Appraisal Report
Parce129a & 30
stillwater, Minnesota
I
13
']i
.~
VIEW FROM FRONT
VIEW FROM REAR
R. W. J{ i'fchner & A-SSociateS
~pp~aisa~ EepO~~
'Pa~ce~ 29a &. 30
sti~~~ater, ~i~~esota
S'tEEET SCENE
14
e
e
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
DEFINITION OF HIGHEST AND BEST USE
Highest and Best Use is defined as "The most profitable likely
use to which a property can be put. The opinion of such use may
be based on the highest and most profitable continuous use to
which the property is adapted and needed, or likely to be in
demand in a reasonable near future. However, elements affecting
value which depend upon events or a combination of occurrences
which, while within the realm of possibility, are not fairly
shown to be reasonable probable, should be excluded from consid-
eration. Also, if the intended use is dependent on an uncertain
act of another person, the intention cannot be considered."
The property is zoned Public Administration.
It is located on South Main Street, just south of the Central
Business District and has major highway frontage. It is
currently leased to Sondra Gozzi of Vittorio's for $1,926
annually.
Due to its current usage and its location, I do not believe that
the City would have a problem with rezoning the land to Central
Business District.
This zone requires 10,000 square 100t lot area and front setbacks
of 15 feet; rear setback of 20 feet and side setback of 10 feet,
or 20 feet total. It appears that the site is just under 10,000
square feet and would require a variance. Off street parking is
also required.
As indicated previously, if the area of the site that has less
than 20 feet between the street right-of-way and the cliff face
is excluded all that is usable is roughly 2,000 square feet and
that at most would accommodate a triangular building with a
foundation area of 600 square feet without any available area to
meet parking requirements.
I do not believe the City would waive its parking requirements or
that a developer would be interested in a development so limited
in scope.
Therefore, it is my opinion that the highest and best use of the
site is its current usage or as public parkland dressed up to
enhance the southern entrance to downtown.
15
~
R. W Kirchner & JAssociates
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
vaL
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
LAND VALUATION
In estimating the of land, the subject is normally compared
to sales and offerin s of land within the community, or in other
similar or competit've locations. Through this comparison of
comparable sales data, a judgment as to value can be made.
A number of recent sales of commercially zoned properties in the
area were analyzed. The more comparable of these sales are set
forth below. The e comparable sales were analyzed and
appropriate adjust ents were made for differences in size,
location, topography, I utilities, date of sale and other pertinent
characteristics. I
16
e
e
e
e
-
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
COMPARABLE LAND SALE #1
Location
Corner of Nelson Alley
and South Second Street.
Stillwater, Minnesota
Legal
Part of Lots 8 & 9 and
Lot 25, Block 29
Original Town of Stillwater
Buyer
Crown Life Insurance Company
Seller
Chrysler Credit Corporation
Date of Sale
September 22, 1989
Zoning
CBD
Size
100 x100 = 10,000 square feet
Sale Price
$80,000
$8.00
Price per square foot
utilities
Bituminous street, concrete
curb, sidewalk, public water
and sewer, storm sewer
This vacant land sale is directly behind the Grand Garage roughly
one block north of the subject. The buyer of the Grand Garage
thought it was included in the purchase of the Grand Garage and
later purchased it for badly needed parking. Deducting the value
of the paving indicates $7.00 per square foot for the land.
17
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
e
Location
Legal
Buyer
Seller
Date of Sale
Zoning
Area
Sale Price
Price per square foot
This is a relativel
south frontage road
and across Highway #
the property but I do
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
COMPARABLE SALE #2
Highway 36
Oak Park Heights, MN
Outlot A, Wal-Mart Add.
Midas Realty Corp.
Wal-Mart Addition
August 26, 1993
e
General Business
39,557 square feet, MOL
$122,000
$3.08
level, open tract of vacant land on the
f Highway #36 at the entrance to Wal-Mart
6 from Cub Foods. There is a contract on
not believe it has closed yet.
e
18
tit
-
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
-~
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
COMPARABLE SALE #3
Location
Legal
Buyer
Seller
Date of Sale
Zoning
Area
Sale Price
Price per Square Foot
14130 60th Street N.
Stillwater, Minnesota
Lengthy-Appraisal File
Vicorp Restaurants, Inc.
Brackey
October 18, 1990
BPC
64,800 square feet
$259,000
$4.00
This is relatively level, open tract of vacant lant land on the
frontage road of Highway #36 about 2 miles southwest of the
subject property. A Baker's Square Restaurant has been developed
on the site.
19
R.W. Kirchner & rssociaws
I
I
e
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
COMPARABLE SALE #4
Location
5965 Osgood Avenue N.
Oak Park Heights, MN
Legal
Lot 1, Block 1,
Oak Park Heights Auto Plaza
Buyer
Valvoline Instant Oil
Change, Incorporated
Seller
Osgood Partners
Date of Sale
November 3, 1989
Zoning
B2
e
Area
24,355 square feet
Sale Price
$135,000
Price per Square Foo~ $5.54
!
This is relatively IJ'vel, open tract of vacant land just south of
Highway #36 on Count Road 67. It is roughly 2 miles southwest
of the subject. It is near a busy interchange and across from
the st. Croix Mall. Since the sale, a Rapid Oil Change facility
has been built on thj site.
e
20
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
stillwater, Minnesota
ADJUSTMENT CHART
Updated Net Ind.
Price Location Size Utilities Tapa. Adj. Value
Camp. #1 $8.00 -$2.00 -0- -$.40 -0- -$2.40 $5.60
Camp. #2 $3.08 -0- +$.60 -0- -0- +$ .60 $3.68
Camp. #3 $4.00 -0- +$.80 -0- -0- +$ .80 $4.80
Camp. #4 $5.54 -0- +$.40 -0- -0- +$ .40 $5.94
Adjustment of these sales indicates a value for usable site area
of $5.00 per square foot.
2,000 square feet usable site area x $5.00 per square foot =
$10,000
21
R. w: Kirchn&r & ~Ssociates
I
i
e
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
INCOME APPROACH
The property is cur ently leased to Sondra Gozzi for $1,926
annually. It is adj cent to Vittorio's Restaurant also owned by
Ms. Gozzi and is lea ed to provide aesthetic support and access
for Cave Tours. The site is adjacent to her facility and has no
obvious use to anyone else except the City of Stillwater in order
to spruce up the sout ern entrance to the downtown area.
LAND LEASE VALUE
Land leases are reI tively scarce in the Twin Cities Area, so
current data on leas rates are scarce. In estimating a market
lease rate for the 1 nd that is the subj ect of this appraisal,' I
talked to lessors, r al estate developers and speculators, other 4It
appraisers and theist. Paul Port Authority. Three actual
comparable leases we~e found. One was from 10 years ago and was
between a developer and a bank in La Crosse. The second was
between Lakeview Hos ital and st. Croix Valley Clinic, P.A., the
third was a parcel of industrial land in Minneapolis.
The appraisers and 1 nd investors indicated 8% to 10%. Another
rule of thumb is 1% ess than a normal capitalization rate used
in appraising land a d buildings. Typical capitalization rates
are currently running 10%. This also indicates 9%. Therefore, I
have concluded that reasonable rate of return would be 9% with
reappraisal every fi~e years to reflect inflation in land values
and/or changes in lonf term rates of returns.
AS indicated previou ly the site is leased at $1,926 annually.
M~nus the prospectiv expense of real estate taxes estimated at
$600 indicates a net 'ncome of $1,326.
I
Capitalized at 9%:
$1,326
.09
=
$14,733
Sa
$14,700
e
22
-~
e
R. ~ Kirchner & Associates
Appraisal Report
Parcel 29a & 30
Stillwater, Minnesota
CORRELATION AND VALUE CONCLUSION
The indicated value by each of the approaches
is:
Cost Approach
Direct Sales Comparison Approach
Income Approach
N/A
$10,000
$14,700
As indicate in the highest and best use analysis, it is my
opinion that the highest and best use, other than public, is its
current usage. Therefore, in my final analysis I have relied on
the income approach for my final va+ue estimate.
Therefore, it is my opinion that the market value of the land,
~ excluding all improvements on the site, is:
FOURTEEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS
(14,700)
The above value estimate represents fee simple market value
unencumbered by special assessments. However, in this case, the
buyer will be assuming pending special assessments. In my
opinion, the utility and street improvements enhance the value of
the property 25% or $3,000.00. Therefore, the estimated
reasonable purchase price is $14,700 minus $3,000 special
assessments equals:
ELEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS
($11,700)
NOTE: This appraisal cannot be fully understood unless the
Assumptions and Limitations are read in their entirety.
e
23
R.W Kirchner & fssociates _~
I
I
e
ASSUMPTI
AND LIMITATIONS OF APPRAISAL
This appraisal is fo no purpose other than property valuation,
and the appraisers ~e neither qualified nor attempting to go
beyond that narrow sc pee The reader should be aware that there
are also inherent lim'tations to the accuracy of the information
and analysis contai ed in this appraisal. Before making any
decision based on the. information and analysis contained in this
report, it is critically important to read this entire section to
understand these limitations.
I
I
A raisal is not a su ve
It is assumed that t e utilization of the land and improvements
is within the boundafies of the p~operty lines of the property
described and that t~ere is no encroachment or trespass unless
noted with the report~
e
No survey of the property has been made by the appraiser and no
responsibility is as umed in connection with such matters. Any
maps, plats, or draw'ngs reproduced and included in this report
are intended only for the purpose of showing spatial
relationships. The eliability of the information contained on
any such map or drawi g is assumed by the appraiser and cannot be
guaranteed to be co recto A surveyor should be consulted if
these is any concern on boundaries, setbacks, encroachments, or
other survey matters. i
A raisal is not a Ie al 0 inion
Nq responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature that
affect title to the p operty nor is an opinion of title rendered.
The title is assume to be good and marketable. The value
estimate is given w thout regard to any questions of title,
boundaries, encumbra ces, or encroachments. We are not usually
provided an abstract f the property being appraised and, in any
event, we neither ma e a detailed examination of it nor do we
give any legal opini n concerning it.
e
24
R. W Kirchner & Associates
~
e
It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws
unless noncompliance is stated, defined, and considered in the
appraisal report. A comprehensive examination of laws and regu-
lations affecting the subject property was not performed for this
appraisal.
It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and
restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has
been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report.
Information and analyses shown in this report concerning these
items is based only on a rudimentary investigation. Any signifi-
cant question should be addressed to local zoning or land use
officials and/or an attorney.
It is assumed that all required licenses, consents, or other
legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or
national government or private entity or organization have been
or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value
estimate contained in this report is based. Appropriate
government officials and/or an attorney should be consulted if an
interested party has any questions or concerns on these items
since we have not made a comprehensive examination of laws and
~ regulations affecting the subject property.
Appraisal is not an engineering or property inspection report
This appraisal should not be considered a report on the physical
items that are a part of this property. Although, the appraisal
may contain information about the physical items being appraised
(including their adequacy and/or condition), it should be clearly
understood that this information is only to be used as a general
guide for property valuation and not as a complete or detailed
physical report. The appraisers a.re not construction,
engineering, environmental, or legal experts, and any statement
given on these matters in this report should be considered
preliminary in nature.
e
The observed condition of the foundation, roof, exterior walls,
interior walls, floors, heating system, plumbing, insulation,
electrical service, and all mechanicals and construction is based
on a casual inspection only and no detailed inspection was made.
For instance, we are not experts on heating systems and no
attempt was made to inspect the interior of the furnace. The
structures were not checked for building code violations, and it
is assumed that all buildings meet applicable building codes
unless so stated in the report.
25
R. W Kirchner & ..(1ssociates
I
-~
e
The age of any impro ements to the subject property mentioned in
this report should b considered a rough estimate. We are not
sufficiently skilled in the construction trades to be able to
reliable estimate the age of improvements by observation. We
therefore rely on cir umstantialevidence which may come into our
possession (such as ates on architectural plans) or conversa-
tions with those who might be somewhat familiar with the history
of the property such as property owners, onsite personnel, or
others. Parties inte ested in knowing the exact age of improve-
ments on the land sh uld contact us to ascertain the source of
our data and then mike a decision as to whether they wish to
pursue additional invrstigation.
Because no detaileq inspection was made, and because such
knowledge goes beyond the scope of this appraisal, any observed
condition or other co ents given in this appraisal report should
not be taken as a g arantee that a problem does not exist.
Specifically, no g arantee is made as to the adequacy or
condition of the fo ndation, roof, exterior walls, interior
walls, floors, heatin system, air conditioning system, plumbing,
electrical servic ; insulatio~, or any other detailed
construction matters. If any interested party is concerned about
the existence, condit 'on, or adequacy of any particular item, we ~
would strongly sugges that a construction expert be hired for a ~
detailed investigatio .
I
I
A raisal is made un er conditions of uncertaint with limited
data
As can be seen from jimitations presented above, this appraisal
has been performedl with a limited amount of data. Data
limitations result ff'om a lack of certain areas of expertise by
the appraiser (that g beyon.d the scope of the ordinary knowledge
of an appraiser), th inability of the appraiser to view certain
portions of the prorrty, the inherent limitations of relying
upon information provrded by others, etc.
There is also an ecdnomic constraint, however. The appraisal
budget (and the fee f r this appraisal) did not contain unlimited
funds for investigat on. We have spent our time and effort in
the investigative sta e of this appraisal in those area where we'
think it will do t e most good, but inevitably there is a
significant possibil ty that we do not possess all information
relevant to the subje t property.
e
27
e
~
R. W Kirchner & Associates
Before relying on any statement made in this appraisal report,
interested parties should contact us for the exact extent of our
data collection on any point which they believe to be important
to their decision making. This will enable such interested
parties to determine whether they think the extent of our data
gathering process was adequate for their needs or whether they
would like to pursue additional data gathering for a higher level
of certainty.
Information (including projections of income and expenses)
provided by local sources, such as government agencies, financial
institutions, accountants, attorneys, and others is assumed to be
true, correct, and reliable. No responsibility for the accuracy
of such information is assumed by the appraiser.
The comparable sales data relied upon in the appraisal is
believed to be from reliable sources. Though all the comparables
were examined, it was not possible to inspect them all in detail.
The value conclusions are subject to the/accuracy of said data.
e
Engineering analyses of the subject property were neither
provided for use nor made as a part of this appraisal contract.
Any representation as to the suitability of the property for Uses
suggested in this analysis is there~pre based only on a
rudimentary investigation by the appraiser and the value
conclusions are subject to said limitations.
All values ,shown in the appraisal report are projections based on
our analysis as of the date of the appraisal. These values may
not be valid in other time periods or as conditions change. We
take no responsibility for events, conditions, or circumstances
affecting the property's market value that take place subsequent
to either the date of value contained in this report or the date
of our field inspection, whichever occurs first.
Since projected mathematical models and other projections are
based on estimates and assumptions which are inherently subject
to uncertainty and variation depending upon evolving events, we
do not represent them as results that will actually be achieved.
This appraisal is an estimate of value based on an analysis of
information known to us at the time the appraisal was made. We
do not assume any responsibility for incorrect analysis because
of incorrect of incomplete information. If new information of
significance comes to light, the value given in this report is
subject to change without notice.
e
28
R. w: . Kirchner & tssociates
~
e
i
I
Opinions and estima~es expressed herein represent our best
jU..dgmen t but should n tb e construed as advice or recommendation
to act. Any action taken by you, the client, or any others
should be based on y ur own judgment, and the decision process
should consider many :factors other than just the value estimate
and information given in this report.
A raisal re ort limi ations
Appraisal reports are technical documents addressed to the
specific technical ,eeds of clients. Casual readers should
understand that thts report does not contain all of the
information we have oncerning the subject property or the real
estate market. While no factors we believe to be significant but
unknown to the client have been knowingly withheld, it is always
possible that we hav~ information of significance which may be
important to others ~ut which, with our limited acquaintance of
the property and our limited expertise, does not seem to be
important to us. I ,
Appraisal reports Jade for lenders are technical documents
specifically made t~ lender requirements. Casual readers are
cautioned about theirl limitations and cautioned against possible
misinterpretation of ~I he information contained in these reports.
The appraiser should .be contacted with any questions before this
report is relied on for decision making.
e
This appraisal was I prepared at the request of and for the
exclus1've use OfthetClient to whom the appraisal is addressed.
No third party shal have any right to use or rely upon this
appraisal for any pu ose.
There are no requirIents, by reason of this appraisal, to give
testimony or appea in court or any pretrial conference or
appearance required ~ subpoena with reference to the property in
question, unless su~ficient notice is given to allow adequate
preparation and add~tional fees are paid by the client at our
regular rates fori such appearances and the preparation
necessi tated thereby.i
e
29
e
e
e
R. W Kirchner & Associates
-~
This report is made for the information and/or guidance of the
client and possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not
carry with it a right of publication. Neither all nor any part
of the contents or this report shall be conveyed to the public
through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other
media without the written consent and approval of the appraiser.
Nor shall the appraiser, firm, or professional organization of
which the appraiser is a member be identified without the written
consent of the appraiser.
It is suggested that those who possess this appraisal report
should not give copies to others. Certainly legal advice should
be obtained on potential liability issues before this is done.
Anyone who gives out an incomplete or altered copy of the
appraisal report (including all attachments) does so at their own
risk and assumes complete liability for any harm caused by giving
out an incomplete or altered copy. Neither the appraiser nor
this company assumes any liability for harm caused by reliance
upon an incomplete or altered copy of the appraisal report given
out by others. Anyone with a question on whether their copy or
an appraisal report is incomplete or altered should contact our
office. '
Values and conclusions for various components or the subject
parcel as contained within this report are valid only when making
a summation; they are not to be used independently for any
purpose and must be considered invalid if so used. The
allocation of total value in this report between land and
improvements applies only under the reported highest and best use
of the property. The separate valuations for land and buildings
must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are
invalid if so used.
30
R. WKirchner, & {1ssociates
I
I
I
QUAL FICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER
-~
e
OND W. KIRCHNER, SRPA,SRA
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIEN
Staff appraiser for ederal Housing Administration from 1965 to
1968. Employed by he Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the
City of St. Paul, innesota from June 1968 to September 1972.
Independent Fee Appr iser since September 1972 with offices in
Stillwater, Minnesota.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUN AND TRAINING
B.S. Degree in Econo ics from University of Wisconsin at River
FalLs, Wiscons~n. Graduate work at American University,
Washington D.C., and he University of Minnesota.
APPRAISAL COURSES I
Courses this apprais.r has taken and/or passed the test for are 4t
as follows: I
Society of Real Estatr Appraiser sponsored courses:
Course #101 - Introdu~tion to Appraising Real Property - 1971
Course #102 - Applied Residential Property Valuation - 1971
Course #201 - Principles of Income Property Appraising - 1980
Course #301 - Special Applications of Appraisal Analysis - 1984
American Institute of Real Estate Appraiser sponsored courses:
Case Studies in Real state Valuation - 1987
Litigation Valuation - 1987
Standards of Professi nal Practice - 1988
Minnesota Center for eal Estate and Housing Education sponsored
courses:
Housing Inspection cedures in R.E. Appraisal Practice - 1992
PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
Certified Federal Ge eral Appraisal License - State of Minnesota
Licensed Real Estate roker - State of Minnesota
Certified Federal Ge era1 Appraisal License - State of Wisconsin
e
31
e
e
e
R. ~ Kirchner & Associates
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Senior Residential Appraiser (SRA) Appraisal Institute
Senior Real Property Appraiser (SRPA) Appraisal Institute
Headquarters: 225 North Michigan, Suite 724
Chicago, Illinois 60601-7601
Member - National Associations of Realtors
Member - st. Paul Area Board of Realtors
Member - Regional Multiple Listing Services, Inc.
Member - Appraisal Data Network, Inc.
Member - Minnesota Association of Professional Appraisers
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
Over 10,000 appraisals made since 1964. The substantial portion
of these appraisals were made in the Minneapolis/St. Paul
Metropolitan Area and in Western Wisconsin Area. Appraisals
included existing and proposed construction, single family,
duplexes, multi-family, commercial, industrial, recreational
properties, supper clubs, golf courses, easements, condominiums,
townhouses, farms and s~bdivisions. '
Court appointed Commissioner, Washington County, Minnesota.
Served as expert valuation witness in numerous cases in Ramsey,
Hennepin, Washington and Pine Counties.
MAJOR CLIENTS
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
+ Community Development Agency, Minneapolis, Minnesota
+ Federal National Mortgage Association, (FNMA)
+ Minnesota Department of Transportation
+ Washington County, Minnesota
+ Department of Veterans Affairs, State of Wisconsin
+ City of Stillwater, Minnesota
+ City of Oakdale, Minnesota
+ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
+ Washington/Ramsey County Waste-to-Energy Agency
+ Washington County Housing & Redevelopment Authority
32
R. W Kirchner & A,.ssociates
-~
.e
MORTGAGE LENDERS
+
+
+
Firstar Bank, Stil water, Minnesota
TCF Mortgage Corpo ation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Metropolitan Feder I Bank, Fargo, North Dakota, Stillwater,
Edina, Lindstrom, ine City, Minnesota
Norwest Mortgage C~mpany, st. Paul, Minnesota
Central Bank, stillwater, Minnesota
Dakota Mortgage Co poration, Hastings, Minnesota
Investors Mortgage Roseville, Minnesota
FBS Mortgage Corpo ation
Lake Elmo Bank, La e Elmo, Minnesota
North Star Title C9mpany
Forest Lake State aank, Forest Lake, Minnesota
Bank st. Croix, Ro erts, Wisconsin
MidAmerica Bank, H dson, Wisconsin
First National Ban of Chaska, Chaska, Minnesota
Sterling Mortgage ompany, st. Louis Park, Minnesota
First National Ban of Hudson, Hudson, Wisconsin
First Federal Savi 9s Bank La Crqsse, Hudson, Wisconsin
Vermillion State B nk, Hastings, Minnesota
Rosewood Mortgage ompany, Roseville, Minnesota
Fullerton Financia Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota
Minnesota Resident'al Mortgage Company, st. Paul, Minnesota
e
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
RELOCATION RESOURCES
+ Boatmen's RelocatiOf' st. Louis, Missouri
+ Associates Relocati n, Washington, D.C.
+ Coldwell Banker, Sc amburg, Illinois
+ Prudential Corporat'on, Mariette, Georgia
+ PHH Home Equity, Oa brook, Illinois
OTHER
+ Numerous attorneys individuals and small business
e
33
SALES OF EXCESS
S.P. 8214 (212-45-23)
Washington County
Parcels 29A and 30
Entire Tract 10,179 s.f.
. .-. .._--------------
I
I
1
I
I
J
.1
I
I
I
I
I
~--i
001)
o
o
...._.. :"~:_ - .. .,:,"9-
'.:!- .....:. :'0 ~
..~ ~'.:
".
"; .'
.. 00",
,0, :::'?;"
:~:_.:.:--:.:::.:~
.... .'
."0. ..
... .....0
Jf'.
...
. .:';'.=: .
.. ~.:....' -
I
-..
-!-
a
a
a
0)
a
. "--
'::!41800
.---~....
~
'. > -;-: . '. . ..;.; \,::.::. :..:.j ';'~:'-: :~':~}~ :~;.~: \Wj:&~~'~':j
.... .'0 . -... . .,...~.{'::: ., .,.', . ,'''''..;\..,,{..1~,... 'J
.' ,:,::"': ...':::..~l~~~'g,!.fi~~
.. . .... '" ". .... ...t' . t. ',"s:"..,"" t
f~
N
I
_ i
. i
I
\,'v~
..9. . .'- ~\ . ~-:> .
. -':"-~:.;.':". 0: ",. '/<00 !
. -' . ..' 0'
..'~~~-.~~.>.I~..~ .' \...~~~...:.< ;
'. .n ....Q . .. . . .
'.:',.......,'. ,'co~ .. ': '-:.' .
'" 0". 0'.' I
.:. <~L: j/.~~.;.~.' '
.J.
. .r-.
1-"
U)
>-
<(
3:
o
6 '(
0:::
IT)
-. .'
'. .." e,
o :.:..... ,',' . .0.";
.- :" :.-. .
;', ~.o "~" " :":':" '.~:'. :.~': :. .-
. . ..' .~. ~~ .... ~. .,'
Legend:
c-.
For view from this
camera position see
this photograph
........ . ."Co
. '. . "- . ~.
.... e. ....
.. '.' - . .
. '. ._ e. " '.
to
to
. ;:~:~~ \/L~.;.::j~\'~ ~;~i~?~j~~~t%7~s~:;~,_\ .; '-'.
.(Parcet....~
-5-
II'"
co.
-
1
i
Part of _
Bay town .-
Township
-- ---~
"'111 51
:i
r
(5'
Oak.Park
Heights
Bay town
Township
it
s
--~...,~.
"C
'ft-
I 'i:". ~ ~"~L~"L.:_" " '~r:""/..:It' ~. J'~,.[ ~L~ke "-.~. OELN-L
1'~" ""~ '~~r~~~Iz.~~'" .. ~.l'1 r,;r7 r- ~l if Ca p . \"'.. 6 '\
1.1/ ,. ,~~ 2Siii.,.. N"'~"" r.k. - > . . 0'" -Ii: t;; ";
" C) re 1"(.1. ;"':.J", '< z. ~ . <' , 0 P:s
;.1:... . ..",8 ' ~;':'~::' "., 7' ,::E, ~ f '.~ 1li oml
~ ;z's!.~~-'?'~ M"~~_ ~l~o w.;: _ .. :~Littl_,,~,..RII~/~ +. ~a-
. I 8 15. ~., Carn~l~ ~i4'"
I .,. .k. ~ Lake" <1:-' .357} . 0 I
6TH C!i . el :y., 0 10TH . .' '-- 'st4~ ~ 11 ~, :::: '" )~.'lAN"'" D1N~~1
- 05TH S~ lii La"' "-, , n" ~..... .:ilJT S II I 1\....- I H {;>..:t /_ \j
~ a I~ --"0 \.-<~~: :JY:. !) .""" ~ . .~
t4-;~ _ 'J-:" ~(~ ~L,~ ./ z ~ ~ w UOTHST.N. __ J T':J:
. , 51., . I . ~ <"Y""'" ~ ''''L.~ .:: TW'C""T :!' ~
I~m"""'."#la .', 4~ ~ -f,l. ~ W~D. ~ ~.~ _~:t;bIL DR.;~
Sl.O
ou on '
110. wE -IDi ~ l~i<..,: I TH ST ~. ~ \(> SCENE:g 1-1- . !3-C\
jRI, ii A ",.. ~J ~ ufl'!' -=- . ::E ~ 0 =! "l: (
f c ~ A .~z 51 N;C 62/10 Q . ." R1YERWAY~. ~
~ It sr:;; II 60TH ~fT> ~2NO 1NN ._T. '1/ '. '~-.,,~, ,;j t- '"
.,," - z: .~ 36 . 36 ~
<<.-1 1 'J) .~ <;> ~r ">-" 35 0 RIVER
~."""'" 't- le.ar ~ ~ ~ ~...: IN~
r~.. ~.. .......V .' 1..:5. !:.ake w... 1/ ".na~.t ci 1!!000-RE' "" .
. \,(M~~4':n 1; 50TH ST. N.' -' 't~yak <>: '" ~ ~ l
,~13 .:!~~ c...=....'l1l..' · "'.i.'.N./...$17 ~.. ~ ,:o.;~ i}~[J~ ]'i.N. -I - - - ~
, ''It-''';. ~ ::i' 'ake;!.~L. ~ Mh ~ z ". RA'(\\.EY ~
I'SOUTH" . s.....;>' ~'. "4nfi.~~"1f\ ~A Y U fIJ I~ N::s,lh I:1h..
< N. ~'~Lak~ 81~'" ~ =1 ~ ~WP 21 Itt8U' ~~
.6 ~ ~ ~~E~~!;Q~:'~) t RTL ~'~E~~ ~~ oU~~ g ~
"'a I - Lagl deL j' - k;~'" ',> :5 1;;' z Ii Z2NO 51 N. ',i. '',.-v r JACOBS N
Point~ In-I'd 20TH" NEW8ER~ TIt:::: 191H51.N - . INEST. ~m-' --
,,' ". l, a h \r~""Jl!b~!..~ee AV.... > l5r ~ ;;~8 N 95 III n~' 0",'83:",
A:,TERS .. ~ :' ~ ~ 1i Lake~ ~~ N j ~ ~ '~"-, I ':R~T~~ RD. ...
u ...ST?:> ". c.",..,. t' 10TH ?"'v',,, l'f I ~ N. .
c~'~tq~ fall' ~ !:k:~:5 ~ TWP, ~. ~'a j 1~
rer'f fm3 l!i ~6.~,m;....a.;;9'rt s , ~J .... u. b ,,"OWE
La e ,___ Lg;,l ?ke 11 a,~ .....":. ~(;:-
:~ ~. '~l+, ~ ,;:.;. ~ ~s~ ';'"'" h ~
,.,a ~ .. RD. f~IvAL~ IV CREEK RD. ~~:1!i';' ,'31 t\fr -- g ~
.~;!I..~ ~ ~lA ,". ~ 1>'" '''''~iRO~
Ilke 0 ~<? ~r' a:::
BAY. __~ 0
i W fmbury
BAIlEY ii:. 18 RD. w
~.r~ . ~ke ~ 0 I\:..:!!!i ~.... !
:z is w CD a: "'_
~. ...... g CI ~
por ~ ' ~ DA; '" RD. ...
GLEN: ~ ~",cn ; d~ ~ ~
~~ .~ :~ -., en ,.~
. .... 65TH ~ : ST. e 5.,.. I'o...n '..0 "".::: '"'.. ~
. .; I. "" Gable. "."
..~~~.t..22m;~a}:'tfts~~~ :, j~ .~! -'~~;
\ \~~ . S'. ~t~ ~~ _ ~ ;n '"S I OUNlY... .n Grove._ 7THST~ J hCOUNTY
56 ~;: \1 ~ ~f ~TH. S ~:R Al ~ 90TH , MSAT. ASK' j/!:t "~\,,, lLl':>
,,)/y'~ ,1119 ; angdo~ ~(.f.~ ARK\.; UI:::~, vi' ER ~<{'
'Ii ~ ll'\ ~1jloTHST.S.~. looT"./\ ST. s. ~ ! ' ~
,h' NEE~ i 'to a; , " ...'f, ~WP ",:1 ,CROIX I, i RD.
/ -7 - . ~ OSl. S. ~ ffi ~'-' \ ~ II . ~ ~ ; ; TV _
15 TIONAl COUN;:
,;,~a un . 'Ii' ,,:;;~ ,,', w~, -' '~,j 0 ,; ,;;j/~ /@);9
,/". .flke LA INIR. ..j :. ~~';.. 0:5.;"1 &)~ ..L':I-_g_
- ,~'::~~ ~I IUJl ' ":"f't' ~z 117TH~S.
- ". "=::7 I&r~ I ' , , 20TH 5!; S. ::
> I :~ 0 > A ;~"'~/( .'~ ~ " " a Inln ~ r 2NDST,S ,. /T [.1J ,.. - ~
r.:i ~oSe ~OU~. s I ; ~~'"" ~ ,; Itt.~~;'~' · ~._';, / p1esc1ott 'j I.-
135~'ST.~. ~TH..T.E. .~. ,.:;,. "' -~'~1~~ > r
h,,~ 40.'.IP~ s~ E. .~~ ~I -8 ~ lIST S :<:. )( I HaY-ISTER
.~f~~~ I ~~;:~;~
>;~~\~~ Yb "SIt st.
I':>~,
.;:
Lake
:T ,.
'k. ~
4 GO ~~t -'
or fI !Lake. w
f. ><: ...
~d1 59
n.,
~
'" Q
o
ji~
D. G"
~~t'::E adnai
:3 . ......
h 12- F
I':"'k '~Jr. ~.:~~. tS.,...x
' J~ /rM
. a . 'l"r~ [III
":T,(':::; ......,.
s '.
~~ co.
'~ . . H
<Ii( "." t:.
! ~.I ".J ==
); '= I I~I'
~ .1:m':1"'l T
,::"!idi",
:i.' ,coo
~.. fM ~ ..
,Ir,
)
6 ~
5
- r:IAY~_'-': 129 _
.~ ~t;~f 1 ,,:~_. '_~i?'r:cl:~~j'
· }~ ;:. ~~:?0;';~@ 30
~~==' ~ .;Sjf}l1 jQ
.V. ~ '" it 61 ~ fOs, IJ
~49J v-'~z 5.
~I'" ~~+ ~ i'^.i
. 31" ~~. ~ ~5~ T
'::.. ~ ~\~fei3
~\\ 1 J '\ ~/ ~
1....\\ ' OWER
.w EORG~.b."'- '\ St.I1AUL ~,
'" ~OOWNTOWtr~.
t.~ z:1" CI), PORT '"
~ lMAN,~._
..-:J. ...";; UTlER AV. N~ / Eye \ ,~""
3 0 ~b
- ""(56)\\ I 61 u
~"4 ~. t~&2~CO.R."~'le.~: ~\ . ~
NTW' TH_ r-JlI' ~.J v,',; 10
. . :"r .1 nn'" III ~ ,,, '- .
-:/ 63 I ~ K 3 Is;? 11 ~"-'''
Q J BUD. . "
.,.~ , . : tn.l~
J ~~!.
'Ii- ,b:1J,
UTH
>- ROLLING M~
I-
z
=>
o
u
~
-'
110.
..it:
,Is..;
'.'.':5
~
GLENMONT
IS~
COUN
o
(/)
~
~.
\ 55
,;~
~ ~~: iP
:~ <(
~ :A\Y::-tl..
,1
-
.
"'i!7i
....,:..~ 52
\Jare"" "' ili
c,, Lake$,
.l'""
X~~
3
~
w -
ci 0
iii
'" >
z ci
v. z '"
=>