The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-09-02 CC Packet ~ r illwater "~ - - - ~ --- ~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA . J e TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM MAYOR ANO COUNCI\,\.. ~) PLANNING STAFF ~- SEPTEMBER 2, 1993 e SUBJECT: RESTRICTIVE SOILS ORDINANCE DISCUSSION: The attached Restrictive Soils Ordinance is an ordinance regulating development of restrictive soils. This regulation will minimize the risk of environmental damage and will protect homeowners and governmental units from incurring capital costs from the necessity of correcting soil deficiencies. The ordinance is a requirement in the watershed plans. Allan Zepper, Building Official, has reviewed the ordinance and approves of its adoption. The Planning Commission reviewed the ordinance at their regular meeting of July 12, 1993. The City Council has. approved the first reading of this ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve second reading of the Restrictive Soils Ordi nance. . . e CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 e e e . DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. RESTRICTIVE SOIL ORDINANCE Subdivision 1. Legislative Findings and Purposes. The City of Stillwater finds that certain areas within the City are characterized by certain soil types, slopes and water levels which, without proper corrective action, are unsuitable for development in these areas increasing soil materials into groundwater, encourages pollution, destroys ecological and natural resources and requires expenditures of public funds to correct deficiencies; thereby acting to the detriment of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Stillwater. Therefore, the purpose of this ordinance are to provide for the regulation of development on restrictive soils in such a way as to minimize the risk of environmental damage and to protect private homeowners and governmental units from incurring high maintenance and capital costs resulting from the necessity of correcting deficiencies encountered as a result of development on poorly suited soils. Subd. 2. District Boundaries. This ordinance shall apply to areas within the City of Stillwater which are delineated on the official soils map of Washington County as contained in the Washington County Soil Survey and have soil types set forth in Table A (attached). For purposes of determining the application of this ordinance to any particular parcel of land, the above-referenced map shall be on file in the office of the city clerk and shall be available for inspection and copying. Subd. 3. Definitions. A. Person. An individual or firm, corpora1;ion, partnership, association or other private body or governmental entity. B. Structure. Any building which may provide shelter for any person, animal or item of property~ Subd. 4. Restrictive Soils Development Permit Provision. A. Except as hereinafter provided in this ordinance, no person shall erect any structure within restrictive soils areas without having first obtained a written permit from building inspector authorizing the same. B. Exceptions. The permit requirements established by this ordinance shall not apply to: 1. Any public agency or its contractor or any person performing work within a right-of-way of any public agency pursuant to a permit issued by such public agency. 2. Emergency work necessary to preserve life or property. When emergency work is performed under this section, the person performing it shall report the pertinent facts relating to the work to the building inspector prior to the commencement of the work. The building inspector shall review the facts and determine whether any emergency exists and shall, by written memorand authorize the commencement of the emergency exception. The person commencing emergency work shall, within ten days, following the commencement of that activity, apply for the i suance of a restrictive soil development permit and ont the i suance thereof may be required to perform such work as is de ermined to be reasonably necessary to fulfill the purposes f this ordinance. e 3. Developm t consisting of the corrective alteration, repair or maint nance of any lost full use of land existing on the date of doption of this ordinance. C. Application fo and Processing of Permit. A separate application for a permit hall be made to the building inspector for each development fo which a permit is required except that only one application ne d be made for two or more such acts which are to be done on the sam parcel. The application shall include a map of the site and a del neation of the soil found in the site along with a plan and cost stimate of the proposed development and such other engineering da a, surveys and other information and material as may be required in order to determine the effects of such development on the affecte land and the suitability of the soils for said development. en proposed work includes construction or alterations of structures, such work shall .be submitted with the application, along with det iled drawings of any special foundation structures and/or special provisions for on-site sewage disposal. e D. Issuance of P rmit. The following standards shall govern the issuance of pe its for development within restrictive soils overlay district: 1. General Standards. Development on restrictive soils shall not be permi ted until an investigation and subsequent report has been co leted and presented to the building'inspector by a professi nal engineer or soil scientist experienced and knowledg able in the practice of soils and soils mechanics, and unti the recommendations thereof have been incorporated into the design plan and specification. No permit shall be issued f r development on soils deemed by the ordinance to be unsuitab e. 2. Attached hereto and labeled Table A is a grouping of restrict ve soils from the Soil Survey of Washington County which a e hereby incorporated and made a part of this ordinanc . The so 1 symbols set forth in Table A are hi hly restrictive for residential, commer ial, industrial or other develo ment due to high water table (three feet or less), steep slope condit ons (18% slopes or greater), high shrink swell potential, high frost e e e e action potential, or shallow to bedrock. No development permit shall be issued unless it has first been demonstrated by the developer that buildings shall be constructed in accordance with the standards found in the Minnesota state Building Code for appropriate soil conditions and that a soil absorption disposal system can satisfactorily function in accordance with municipal regulations. Said standards are hereby incorporated by reference into this ordinance. E. Conditions. A special permit may be approved subject to compliance with conditions reasonable and necessary to insure compliance with the requirements contained in the ordinance which are specifically set for in the permits. Such conditions may, among other matters, limit the size, kind of character of the proposed development, require the construction of other structures, including special foundations and soil stabilization structures, establish required monitoring procedures, require such alterations of the site as may be necessary and/or require the conveyance to the City of Stillwater or other public entity of certain lands or interest therein. F. Time of Permit - Extensions, Reviews. 1. A permittee shall begin the work authorized by the permit within 60 days from the date of issuance of the permit unless a different date for the commencement of work is set forth in the permit. The permittee shall complete the work authorized by the permit which in no event shall exceed more than 12 months from the date of issuance. The permittee shall notify the building inspector at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of work. Should the work not: be commenced as specified herein, then the permit shall become void; provided, however, that if prior to the date established for commencement of work, the permittee makes written request to the building inspector for an extension of time to commence the work, setting forth the reasons for the required extension. A permit which has become void may be renewed at the discretion of the building inspector upon payment of a renewal fee. If permit for such work may be granted only upon compliance with the procedures herein established for any original application. 2. Notice of Completion. The permittee shall notify the building inspector in writing of the termination of the work authorized and no work shall be deemed to have been completed until approved in writing by the building inspector following such written notification. 3. Inspection. The building inspector may cause inspections of the work to be made periodically during the course thereof by I himself or a member of the building inspector staff and shall cause a inal inspection to be made following the completion of the w rk. e Variances and shall be admin Zoning Ordinan ppeals. Variances and appeals for this ordinance pursuant to Chapter ___, Subd. ____ of the G. Subd. 5. Responsibility; A. Responsibility Neither the issuance of a permit nor compliance with the cond"tions thereof, nor with the provisions of the ordinance shal relieve any person from any responsibility otherwise imposed by law for damage to persons or property; nor shall the issuance of an permit hereunder serve to impose any liability on the City of St llwater or its officers or agents. This ordinance shall be i effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Counci this Attest: city cle k day of , 1993. Mayor e e e "TABLE A" SOIL LOSS LIMITS "T" FOR SOILS IN WASHINGTON COUNTY Map Symbol 2 2B 2C 7B 7C 7D 8 8B 8C l2C l2D e 49 49B 49C 49D 75 lOOB lOOC 113 120 123 132B 132C 132D 151 151B 153B 153C 155B 155C 155D 158B 158C .158D 159 159B 161 162 166 169B 169C 170 174C 174D e Soil Name "T" tonsfacfyear Ostrander silt loam, 0-2% slopes 5 Ostrander silt loam, 2-6% slopes 5 Ostrander ~ilt loam, 6-12% slopes 5 Hubbard loamy sand, 1-6% slopes 5 Hubbard loamy sand, 6-12% slopes 5 Hubbard loamy sand, 12-18% slopes 5 Sparta loamy sand, 0-2% slopes 5 Sparta loamy sand, 2-6% slopes 5 Sparta loamy sand, 6-15% slopes 5 Emmert loamy coarse sand, 3-15% slopes 2 Emmert gravelly loamy coarse sand, 12-25% slopes 2 Antigo silt loam, 0-2% slopes 4 Antigo silt loam, 2-6% slopes 4 Antigo silt loam, 6-12% slopes 4 Antigo silt loam, 12-18% slopes 4 Bluff ton loam 5 Copas ton loam, 0-6% slopes 2 Copaston loam, 6-12% slopes 2 Webster loam 5 Brill silt loam 4 Dundas fine sandy loam 5 Hayden fine sandy loam, 2-6% 5 Hayden fine sandy loam, 6-12% 5 Hayden fine sandy loam, 12-25% 5 Burkhardt sandy loam, 0-3% slopes.:3 Burkhardt sandy loam, 3-9% slopes 3 Santiago silt loam, 2-6% slopes 5 Santiago silt loam, 6-15% slopes 5 Chetek sandy loam, 0-6% slopes 3 Chetek sandy loam, 6-12% slopes 3 Chetek sandy loam, 12-25% slopes 3 Zimmerman loamy fine sand, 0-6% slopes 5 Zimmerman loamy fine sand, 6-12% slopes 5 Zimmerman loamy fine sand,12-25% slopes 5 Anoka loamy fine sand,O-3% slopes 5 Anoka loamy fine sand, 3-9% slopes 5 Isanti loamy fine sand 5 Lino loamy fine sand 5 Ronneby fine sandy loam 5 Brahan loamy fine sand, 1-6% slopes 5 Brahan loamy fine sand, 6-15% slopes 5 Blomford loamy fine sand 5 Gale silt loam, 6-15% slopes 4 Gale silt loam, 25-50% slopes 4 177B 177C 177D 189 225 259B 264 265 266 298 298B 301B 302B 302C 325 327 327B 327C 329 340B 340C 342B 342C 342D 342E 367B 408 411 411B 411C 449 452 453B 453C 453D 454B 454C 454D 454F ,A56 460B 460C 468 472B 472C 472D 481 488F 504B 504C 504D Gotham sand, 1-6% slopes Gotham sand, 6-12% slopes Gotham oamy sand, 12-20% slopes Auburnd le silt loam Nessel ine sandy loam, 1-4% slopes Grays silt loam, 2-6% slopes Freeon silt loam, 1-4% slopes Soderville loamy fine sand Freer silt loam Richwood. silt loam, 0-2% slopes Richwood silt loam, 2-6% slopes Lindstro silt loam, 2-4% slopes Rosholt sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Rosholt sandy loam, 6-15% slopes Prebish oam Dickman andy loam, 0-2% slopes Dickman andy loam, 2-6% slopes Dickman andy loam, 6-12% slopes Chaska s'lt loam Whalan s'lt loam, 1-6% slopes Whalan s"lt loam, 6-12% slopes Kingsley sandy loam, 2-6% slopes Kingsley sandy loam, 6~12% slopes Kingsley sandy loam, 12-18% slopes Kingsley sandy loam, 18-30% slopes Campia s'lt loam, 0-8% slopes Faxon si t loam Waukegan silt loam, 0-2% slQpes Waukegan silt loam, 2-6% slopes Waukegan silt loam, 6-12% slopes Crystal ake silt loam, 1-3% slopes Comstock silt loam Demontre ille loamy fine sand, 2-6% Demontre ille loamy fine sand, 6-12% Demontre ille loamy fine sand, 12-25% Mahtomed loamy sand, 0-6% slopes Mahtomed loamy sand, 6-12% slopes Mahtomed loamy sand, 12-25% slopes Mahtomed loamy sand, ,25-40% slopes Ba~ronet silt loam Bay town ilt loam, 1-6% slopes Bay town ilt loam, 6-12% slopes Otter si t loam Channaho silt loam, 1-6% slopes Channaho silt loam, 6-12% slopes Channaho silt loam, 12-18% slopes Kratka f'ne sandy loam Brodale laggy loam, 20-50% slopes Duluth s'lt loam, 1-6% slopes Duluth s'lt loam, 6-12% slopes Duluth s'lt loam, 12-25% slopes 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 ., 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 2-1 2-1 2-1 5 2 5 5 5 e e e e 507 529 529B 529C 540 541 543 544 552 852B 857 857C 858 858C 859B 860C 8600 861C 8610 862 863 896C 8960 896F 1013 1027 1029 1033 1039 1040 1055 1813B 1819F 1820F e 1821 1827 1827B 1847 1848B e Poskin silt loam Ripon silt loam, Ripon silt loam, Ripon silt loam, Seelyeville muck Rifle muck Markey muck Cathro muck Kerston muck UL-Copaston complex, 0-8% slopes UL-Waukegan complex, 0-3% slopes UL-Waukegan complex, 3-15% slopes UL-Chetek complex, 0-3% slopes UL-Chetek complex 3-15% slopes UL-Zimmerman complex UL-Hayden Kingsley complex, 3-15% UL-Hayden Kingsley complex, 15-25% UL-Kingsley complex, 3-15% slopes UL-Kingsley complex, 15-25% slopes UL-Dundas complex, 1-4% slopes UL-Lino complex, 0-3% slopes Mahtomedi-Kingsley complex, 3-12% Mahtomedi-Kingsley complex, 12-25% Mahtomedi-Kingsley complex, 25-40% Pits, quarry Udorthents, wet substratum Pits, grave1 Udifluvents Urban land Udorthents Aquolls and Histosols, ponded Lino Variant loamy fine sand, 2-6% Oorerton-Rock outcrop complex, 25-65% Mahtomedi Variant-Rock outcrop complex 25-60% slopes .. 5 Algansee loamy sand 5 Waukegan Variant silt loam, 0-2% slopes 3 Waukegan Variant silt loam, 2-9% slopes 3 Barronett silt loam, sandy subestratum Sparta loamy sand, bedrock substratum, 0-6% slopes 1-2% slopes 2-6% slopes 6-12% slopes 4 4, 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 2 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 5 ( . 'l 1 e Date: STILLWATER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Aug. 9, 1993 7p.m. Glenna Bealka, Duane Elliott, Dorothy Foster, Jay Kimble, Kirk Roetman, Don Valsvik and Darwin Wald Steve Russell, Comm. Dev. Director, and Ann Pung Terwedo, planning Gerald Fontaine, Chairman, and Rob Hamlin Time Members Present: Members Absent: Vice Chairman Don Valsvik called the meeting to order. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion by Darwin Wald to approve the minutes of July 12, 1993; seconded by Duane Elliott. All in favor. e PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. V/93-46 - A variance to the rearyard setback requirements (25 feet required, 20 feet requested) for construction of a home at 2047 Oak Glen Drive in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Applicants Mr. and Mrs. Freels appeared before the Commission. Mr. Freels said when they bought the lot last year, they thought the setback requirements;were 20 feet, front, and 10 feet, back, rather than 30 and 25 feet, which they discovered after an architect had already designed a home for them. He said the architect"has tried a number of things, including shortening the garage by two feet and placing the house as far north on the lot as possible, but the structure still won't fit on the lot without a variance. Without a variance, they won't be able to have a dinette in the home. The variance is needed for just a small -- five feet deep by seven feet long -- point of the lot, he said Mr. Russell suggested the possibility of a two and one-half foot variance for both the front and backyard setbacks. He noted the lot was on a curve, which lessens any visual impact, and it is the last home in that part of the development. Mr. Freels pointed out that because of the curve in the road, except for the small corner where the variance is needed, the house placement would exceed the setback requirements. e f 2) Mr. Valsvik noted the lot is i the RA District which has various setback requirements that everyone has to maintai e Mr. Roetman made a moti n to approve the variance request due to the unique location of the lot in the dev lopment and the fact the variance is for just a portion of the house, not the entire len th of the structure. Dorothy Foster seconded the motion. Jay Kimble suggested that h rdship could be demonstrated by the shape of the lot. Mr. Elliott said although he was inclined to vote against the request, not too long ago the Commission granted a vari nce for a garage addition because it was on a corner lot which should have been abl to accommodate the addition without a variance. Motion passed five to two, M . Valsvik and Mr. Elliott voting no. Case No. V/93-47 - A vari nce to the total square footage allowable for accessory structures (1,000 feet maxi um allowable for all structures, 1,320 feet proposed) for construction of an attache garage at 811 W. Pine S1. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Applicant Duane Arndt app ared on his own behalf. Mr. Arndt said the proposal is to remove an existing two-car arage that was built in the 1920s. He said it mayor may not be attached; if not aHa hed, he said he would not need a sideyard variance. He said the size of the propo ed garage was not out of place given the size of the property, and he said the p oposed structure would compliment and blend in with the house and carriage house. Mr. Elliott pointed out the d mension listed in the request were incorrect. He said the proposed new garage woul be in excess of 900 square feet, putting the total square footage for accessory buildi gs in excess of 1,600 square feet. Mr. Valsvik asked whether t e structure would be "grandfathered in." Mr. Russell said the existing accessory struc ures are legal non-conforming uses that are permitted as long as kept in existing use; one a structure is removed, the new s.tructure is subject to the current ordinance requir ments. e Mr. Elliott moved to deny th variance request; Mr. Roetman seconded the motion. Mr. Kimble suggested the 0 dinance was overly-restrictive in this instance. If someone wants to build a big garag on a big lot, and the garage isn't going to be used for commercial purposes, why not? he asked. Mr. Valsvik also said he didn't see a problem with the request, c nsidering a structure was there before. Mr. Roetman said part of the Commission's duty is to maintain the integrity of ordinances, granting exce tions based on hardship. Right or wrong (the provision regarding accessory structu es), that's the ordinance, he said. Motion to deny the request d passed 4-3; Dorothy Foster, Mr. Kimble and Mr. Valsvik voted against the denial. e e e e l( 3 Case No. V/93-48 - A Variance to the front yard setback requirement (30 feet required, 20 feet requested) for construction of a 23 by 26 foot garage at 817 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Mr. Hesse, applicant, appeared before the Commission. He said he would like to build a 24 by 26 foot garage, rather than the 23 by 26 foot listed on the request. He said the house was built in 1890; the garage would match the house in color, pitch of the roof, and other design elements. A setback variance is needed because of a retaining wall which separates the property's front and rear yards. Mr. Elliott noted that viewed from the other side, the garage would not protrude, and would actually be more in line with other existing structures. Mr. Kimble expressed a concern about the proximity of the garage to the house. He suggested firewall sheetrock may be required on the wall closest to the house. He later suggested adding a condition that the garage be located a minimum of five feet, six inches from the residence. Mr. Wald made the motion to approve the variance as conditioned; Dorothy Foster seconded the motion. Motion passed 7-0. Case No. V/93-49 - A Variance to the side and rearyard setback requirements (5 feet side and rearyard required, 2 feet 8 inches proposed) for construction of a garage at 912 W. Laurel St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Ray Davis and Connie Devich, applicants, appeared before the Commission. They said the garage would be located at the extreme back and east of the lot, the only logical place on the small site. Most other garages in the neighborhood are located in about the same place on the lots. Due to a "severe mod problem" this spring, they said they had a driveway paved and had a slab poured for the garage, not knowing they would need a variance. They said although they were unaware of the need for a variance, they recognize they had made an error in proceeding. Glenna Bealka made the motion to approve the variance request; Darwin Wald seconded the motion. Motion passed 7-0. . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE C.ommission members were asked to turn in their questionnaires. Mr. Russell said City Council members also are being asked to complete the form. Each Commission member was asked to list their personal priority issues. There was a general discussion about the comprehensive plan as it relates to annexation issues. Mr. Russell told the Commission that staff "feels strongly" it will take a minimum of one year to complete the plan update. SHORELAND ORDINANCE 4 Mr. Russell said the ordinance will have to be brought back at a later date. In researching DNR and wate shed regulations, it was found that Long Lake has to be e included in the ordinance. Duane Elliott moved to adjo rn the meeting at 8:30 p.m.; seconded by Kirk Roetman. All in favor. Submitted by: Sharon Baker Acting recording secretary e e e It e 1 ~ illwater ~ - -..~.. --- ..., -~ THE B I R T H P LAC E 0 F MIN. N E SOT A J M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANN PUNG-TERWEDO, CITY PLANNE DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1993 SUBJECT: C I T Y 0 F S T ILL W ATE RAN 0 THE M INN E SOT A HISTORICAL SOCIETY COOPERATIVE 'AGREEMENT FOR PRISON SITE STUDY . . Background: The City of Stillwater has committed to entering into a cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Historical Society along with funding ($2,000 and Staff time) for an adaptive reuse study of the Historic Territorial Prison Site. The Margaret Rivers Foundation has donated $1,000 toward the study. The Minnesota Historical Society is contributing the match of $4,000. Discussion: The attached cooperative agreement ha~ been prepared which states the responsibilities of the Minnesota Historical Society and the City of Stillwater. We will take the lead in the study which includes contracting for services, assembling for an advisory team of local individuals interested in the site, coordinating andcQnducting various meetings and assist in the preparation of the final report. ' The study will begin in mid-October with a report to be published by late February. Staff Recommendation: A resolution to sign cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Historical Society and direct Staff to proceed with contracting for services and conducting the study. CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 Ch-- ~ ~~ e MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AGENCY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER FISCAL YEAR OBJECT CODE FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER DOLLAR AMOUNT 311. 0284.332.01 1994 5160 27-93-80046A.014 $4,000 $4,000 Federal/HPF CITY Match This agreement is made by and between the Minnesota Historical Society, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, hereinafter called the SOCIETY, acting through its Director and State Historic Preservation Officer, and the City of Stillwater, hereinafter called the CITY. WHEREAS, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) of the SOCIETY is en- gaged in a continuing effort to encourage protection of properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and WHEREAS, the CITY Council of stillwater has~steb the assistance of the SHPO ~d h~ authorized an expenditure o~~~o assist in the development ~or-a-plan for a reuse s u y 0 erritorial/State Prison, and ~1~~WHEREAS, the SOCIETY and the CITY recognize that a preservation team has ~~ , proven to be an effective first step in developing reuse alternatives and r~ exploring related issues for historic properties, ~~y) NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the SOCIETY and the CITY will cooperate on JCY~\- a project to sponsor a consulting team reuse study for the Territorial/State Prison accordance with the provisions below. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. The project period for this activity is from October 1, 1993 to February 28, 1994. ., B. The project will be carried out in accordance with the Project Description included as Attachment A (attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein). II. ASSURANCES A. The CITY agrees that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with the following: 1. OMB Circular A-87 "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State Local Government" and OMS Circular A- 102 (revised) "Uniform Requirements for Assistance to state and Local Governments." 2. Department of the Interior regulations 43 CFR Part 12, Subpart C, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments." e B. a. Id addition to the requirements of these regulations t~e city will allow a minimum of two weeks between t e ~ate bid solicitations are published and the date b'dders must respond; and allow eighteen calendar days b tween the date invitations are mailed to potential b'dders and the date bidders must respond. e 3. Public aw 101-517, Title V, Section 511, states: When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid sol'citations and other documents describing projects or program funded in whole or in part with Federal money, all grantee receiving Federal funds, including but not limited to Stat and local governments, shall clearly state (1) the percent ge of the total costs of the program or project which w'll be financed with Federal money, (2) the dollar amount f Federal funds for the project or program, and (3) percent ge and dollar amount of the total costs of the project or program that will be furnished by nongovernmental sources 4. The "Si Act of 1984." 5. Nationa Register Programs Guideline NPS-49. The CITY assu Rights Act of that Act, no race, color, in, be denied crimination u receives fede mediately tak ment. The CI crimination A suant to the ther, the CIT Statutes Sect hiring of lab 504 of the Re designed to e any program 0 The CITY also nesota Statut es that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil 1964 (P.L. 88-352). In accordance with Title VI of erson in the United States shall, on the ground of r national origin, be excluded from participation the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to dis- der any program or activity for which the applicant al financial assistance, and the CITY - will im- any measures necessary to effectuate this agree- Y also assures it will comply with the Age Dis- t of 1975 and all requirements imposed by or pur- epartment of Interior Regulations 43 CFR.17. Fur- agrees to conform with the provisions of Minnesota on 181.59 which prohibits the discrimination of r by reason of race, creed, or color, and section abilitation Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-112) which is iminate discrimination on the basis of handicap in activity receiving federal financial assistance. assures it is in compliance with Chapter 363 of Min- s as amended. .. e The CITY and OCIETY agree to adhere to the Americans with Disabilities ct of 1990, 42 U.S.C. Sections 12101-12213 (1990) ("ADA"); the DA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities, 5 Federal Register 35457 (July 26, 1991); and the U.S. Departme t of Interior's Design Guide for Accessible Outdoor Recreation (S ptember 1990), if applicable to the project being constructed. The CITY has designated an ADA Coordinator to assure compliance wi h the nondiscrimination requirements contained in Section 35.10 of the Department of Justice ADA Regulations, 28 C.F.R. Part 3 (1991). Information concerning the ADA and the rights afford d thereunder are available from the Bloomington ADA Coordinator, ity of Bloomington, Bloomington Municipal Building, 2215 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431; telephone: (6 2) 881-5811; telecommunications device for the deaf: (612) 887-967 . C. The CITY will Department of or causes of by the CITY. indemnify and save and hold the SOCIETY and the the Interior harmless from from any and all claims ction arising from the performance of this project e D. e In accordance with provisions of 18 USC 1913 regarding lobbying the CITY assures that no part of the project budget will be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal_service~_advertise- ment, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other device intended or designed to influence in any manner a member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution proposing such legisla- tion or appropriation. This shall not prevent communicating to members of Congress on the request of any member or to Congress, through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public business. E. The CITY agrees that any publications, studies, reports, press releases, newsletters, presentations, films, exhibits, or other material prepared with grant assistance will contain an acknowledgment of Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) support and nondiscrimination policy as follows: e "This project has been financed in part with Federal Funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the Minnesota Historical Society under the provi- sions of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Inte- rior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendations by the Department of the Interior. "This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or disability. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminatep against in any program, ac- tivity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, P.o. 37127, Washington, D.C. 20013-7127." F. The CITY assures that transferred federal monies will not be applied as part of the matching (applicant) share", and that monies used as match on other federal grants will not be used as matching (applicant) share on this project. G. The CITY agrees not to contract with any party which is debarred, suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension. Current lists of such parties are on file in the Society's Grants Office and are available for review by the CITY. III. REIMBURSEMENT PROCEDURES e A. Payments under this Agreement will be made on a reimbursable basis according to the schedule included in the Project Description (see Attachment A). All supporting fiscal documentation must be submitted prior to reimbursement. B. A Request for Reimbursement must include the following: 1. Request for Reimbursement Form (see Attachment B). e Suppor ing fiscal documentation for all project costs during the pe iod covered by the request, including both federally funded items and applicant match items. (See Attachment C for In ormation on Allowable costs.) 2. 3. If project work begins prior to September 30, and the City wishes to claim these costs, a Request for Reimbursement must b submitted at the end of the federal fiscal year. Applic nt match must be equal to, or may exceed, the federal funds equested as of September 30 (also see Reimbursement Schedu e of Attachment A). 4. Final's to be submitted with the Final Request for sement Form (see Attachment A). C. The Request or Reimbursement Forms should be submitted to Beverly Mitchell Gor os, Minnesota Historical Society, Grants Office, 345 Kellogg Boul vard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-1906. D. When both th documentatio funds will b will be forw the Society. IV. AUDIT A. The CITY mus completed pu which includ Oldenkamp, S Historical S Minnesota 55 completion. financial documentation and the product has been found to be acceptable by the Society, requested from the Department of the Interior and rded to the City when the funds have been received submit a copy of all audited financial statements suant to OMB Circular A-128 for all fiscal years the project period. These must be submitted to Greg nior Accountant, Finance Department, Minnesota ciety, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, 02 within one hundred and twenty (120) days of their e A. Amendments V. AMENDMENTS AND CAN ELLATION Any signific time frames anticipated problems, de planned perf Bloomberg, D Historical S Minnesota 55 approving or agreement if changes will agrees to su the project conclusion 0 Documentatio disallowed i agreement sh parties who office. nt variations from proposed work, costs, and/or escribed in this agreement which are experienced or uring the course of the project and any significant ays, or adverse conditions which materially affect rmance should be submitted in writing to Britta L. puty State Historic Preservation Officer, Minnesota ciety, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, 02. The SOCIETY will respond in writing, either not approving the changes, and may amend the deemed necessary. The CITY is aware that some require approval from the National Park Service and mit any necessary changes as early as possible during eriod. Variations which are not known until the the project may be submitted with the Financial ; however, the CITY understands that costs may be changes are not approved. Any amendments to this 11 be in writing, and shall be executed by the same xecuted the original agreement or their successors in e e e e B. Cancellation The SOCIETY reserves the right of termination for cause ona thirty (30) day notice should it be determined that the CITY has failed to materially comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement. The agreement may also be terminated when both parties agree that the project will not produce beneficial results commensurate with further expenditure of funds or because of circumstances beyond the control of the SOCIETY and/or CITY. In the event of termination, the CITY may be reimbursed for eligible expenses incurred prior to termination or by negotiated settlement. I have read the above agreement and agree to abide by all of its provisions. Once this Agreement is signed it controls all activities during the project period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date(s) indicated below intending to be bound thereby. Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Boulevard West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Nina M. Archabal, Director (date) Minnesota Historical Society and State Historic Preservation Officer (signature, City official) Print name and title: Date: Britta L. Bloomberg, Deputy (date) State Historic Preservation Officer Gary W. Goldsmith Contracting Officer (date) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ATTACHMENT A e T rritorial/State Prison Reuse Study Federal Project Number: City of Stillwater - Agen y Cooperative Agreement 7-93-80046A.014 1. The purpose of this team to formulate a a National Register property's use and duct ion of a final of the property. 2. The general format similar teams which as Johnston Hall in in Lake County; and will be developed u CITY as the project reuse scenarios wit implications and an current and future project is to sponsor and administer a consulting reuse alternative for the Territorial/State Prison, property, and to investigate issues related to the evelopment. The project will result in the pro- eport which will be used in planning for the future or the team process will loosely follow that of have addressed reuse alternatives for such buildings Faribault; Tettagouche Camp located near Silver Bay the Gideon Pond House in Bloomington. The process der joint consultation between the SOCIETY and the evolves. The final report will include alternative analysis of urban design, management and financial examination of related issues as they apply to the ses of the surrounding area. 3. The CITY will assum lead responsibility for assembling a study team to develop reuse alter atives for the Territorial/State Prison. It 4. The preliminary pro'ect budget will be as follows: Principal Inv stigator (approx. $3 per hour) Team members: Architect Economic De Specialis Heritage Ar a Planner SHPO Historical Architect SHPO Archae logist City Repres ntative Printing Miscellaneous expenses HPF Funds TOTAL CITY $4,000 1,000 0,00.0 1,000 700 300 Project Budget: $4,000 $4,000 $8,000 e e e e S. The specific responsibility of each party are summarized below: A. The SOCIETY will: (1) (2 ) (3) (4) (S) Provide historical information of the property. Furnish the State Historic Preservation Office Historical Architect and SHPO Archaeologist as members of the team. . \ Assist in the team selection process.( 0.....,. FR..O,Y) SI-fPO 6ffic..~.J Review and comment on draft of final report. Assist in the distribution of the final report. B. The CITY will: (1) Act as lead organization in the administration of the project. (2) Consult with project team members to set forth the meeting schedule. (3) Coordinate and conduct the team meetings on site. (4) Collect relevant materials and provide them to the project team members before the on-site meetings. (S) Secure meeting place for the team and confirm arrangements. (6) Assemble the findings of the team into a draft report, cir- culate the draft report for comment, and produce the final report. (7) Assist in distribution of the final report. C. The consultants hired for the project will be selected on the basis of the type of expertise required. Their role will be to: (1) Review all material provided by the CITY prior to the on-site meeting. (2) Provide an on-site consultation (up to three days). (3) Interview local consultation participants during the project. (4) Review and comment on final report draft. (S) Write appropriate sections for final report draft. (6) Assist in the presentation of the project findings. D. Project Schedule: (1 ) 10-1-93 to 10-1S-93 (2 ) 10-16-93 to 11-1S-93 (3) 11-16-93 to 12-1S-93 (4 ) 12-16-93 to 2-28-94 Background research and consultation with SOCIETY. Assemble Consulting Team and have on-site Team Study. Submit Draft of Final Report. Revise and produce Final Report. e MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Steve Russell, Community Development Director~ September 3, 1993 FR: DA: RE: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR MARKET SQUARE PROJECT As directed by the City Council, the feasibility study for the Market Square Project has been prepared by SEH (attached). The total public facility cost is $3,757,560. This is very close to the previous estimate of $3 million with the addition of the Washington/36 work ($500,000). Of that number, developer costs total $1,193,324 while City costs total $1,162,410. The City costs include off-site drainage costs of $530,419 for Stillwater West Business Park, a portion of the costs for the City owned community facility land north of Curve Crest and street costs for the Tower Drive area. In addition to the City costs of $1,162,410, $1 million of road improvement costs will be paid by the City and reimbursed by MnDOT at a latter date. There is ~ adequate TIP consistent with TIP policy from the project to pay City costs. Details of the feasibility study and cost allocation will be presented at meeting time. Recommendation Review of feasibility study and, if approved, order preparation of plans and specifications. .. e \ e "'SeH 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE. 200 SEH CENTER, Sf PAUL. MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRAN$PORTA T/ON May 26, 1993 RE: Stillwater, Minnesota Myrtle Street Ravine Drainage L.I. No. 284 SEH File No. 93034 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 North 4th Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-4898 Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are enclosing a draft copy of the above referenced report. This report was presented to the previous Council, however, no decision was reached by the Council. We feel that it is important that the Council review the Myrtle Street Ravine Drainage and consider the improvement. The old storm sewer, which is beneath the home on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Myrtle Street, is deteriorating. It is possible that this storm sewer could collapse any time. e The concern of the Council previously was the amount of the assessment to various properties. The assessment role enclosed with this draft copy of the report was prepared with 100% of the project costs assessed to each property involved. The assessment is also levied over the total drainage area indicated on drawing No. 1. Some considerations which the Council may wish to make would be regarding the method of assessment, the area assessed and whether a stormwater taxing district should be established. We are reintroducing this report in draft form such that the CouncIl can review it and discuss it with the undersigned, if you wish, before a final copy of the report is completed and provided to the Ci ty. We feel that the solutions that have been made for the drainage problem in the house d?wnstream at the corner of Fifth Street and Myrtle Street are only temporary at best. Once again, we would be pleased to discuss this with the Council at your leisure. Sincerel y, Jjl,~';:.~J!F'9nv~ Richard E. Moore, P.E. Ci ty Engineer REM:kam e Enclosures: c: Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator David Junker, Public Works Director SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN Sf CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI \Q)~~Wlf feas\b\\\t'/ Report City of stillwater Minnesota e ~yrtle Street Ravine Drainage . , ~;~:4 [. I I f /'J 0, /, ( I Sf;H. File No. 93034 septeU\ber 8, 1992 e e e I hereby ertify that this report was prepared by me or under m direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registere Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesot . Date: Sep ember 8, 1992 Reg. No.: Date: Se ember 8 1992 18612 e e e e September 8, 1992 RE: Stillwater, Minnesota Myrtle Street Ravine Drainage SEH File 93034.00 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 As authorized, we have prepared this feasibility report to address the drainage concerns of the Myrtle Street Ravine between Harriet Street and Sixth Street, just south of Myrtle Street. The purpose of the report is to study the most feasible drainage system to adequately outlet storm water flowage from the ravine. The existing outlet is under capacity and has caused repetitive flooding at a downstream home. The existing pipe is located under an existing home just south of Sixth Street. We recommend that a combination of a detention basin and a sto~ sewer system will solve the City's problem. We conclude that the project, as detailed in the following report, is feasible and can best be constructed utilizing the most economical methods for an estimated cost of $245,000.00. Existing Conditions , The Myrtle Street Ravine conveys storm water runoff from a drainage area of 45.2 acres. The drainage area encompasses residential areas from south at Greeley and Pine, west to Owens, one block north of Myrtle and east to Harriet Street. The location map, drainage area, and existing storm sewer are shown on Drawing No. 1. Storm water runoff is conveyed to the ravine by several small storm sewer systems. The storm water runoff from the drainage area is outletted from the ravine into two 24-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe that lie just south of Myrtle Street and run under Sixth Street at an angle. The pipe flow is then restricted at an 18-inch diameter storm sewer pipe. The 18-inch diameter pipe discharges into a 27-inch diameter storm sewer system in the Myrtle Street right-of-way at Fifth Street. The 24-inch diameter and 18-inch diameter storm sewer pipes were cons ructed in the 1930s. It is the 18-inch diameter storm sewer A segment that does not have e ough capacity to co~vey the discharge and causes flooding ,., problems downstream. The c ndition of the pipe is deteriorating. Unfortunately, the two 24-inch outlet pipes are locat d under a house on the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Myrtle. This location of a ery old and perhaps damaged City utility creates an undesirable situation for the ity. Proposed Improvemen s Drawing No.2 illustrates e proposed improvements. They include excavating the ravine between Harriet Stree and Sixth Street to create a detention basin and construction of storm sewer in the Myrtl Street right-of-way from just west of Sixth Street to Fifth Street. The existing storm se er outlet will be abandoned. The detention basin and storm sewer system is designed to tch the capacity of the existing 27-inch diameter pipe at Fifth Street for a 10o-year, 24- our design storm. The existing 27-inch diameter pipe has a full flow design capability of 8 cubic feet per second (cfs). Since the peak discharge of the drainage area is 102 cfs, the avine is proposed to be excavated to contain a volume that will store the difference in ru off between the inflow and the capacity of the existing pipe. The outlet is designed to allo a 75 cfs outflow. The peak storage volume for the proposed detention basin is 1.54 acre fe t. The peak elevation for the design storm is 821.6 mean sea level (MSL). Minimum build ng elevation in the area is 823 MSL. The difference between the peak elevation and the earby building allows a lo5-foot freeboard condition. The proposed detention basin wi I not hold water between storms. It is designed to be a "dry" A detention basin. ,., The ravine detention basin will outlet into a 36-inch diameter storm sewer that is proposed to be open cut co tructed from the pond to Manhole 3 as shown on Drawing No.2. It is proposed to insta the remaining storm sewer under Myrtle Street by boring a 24-inch steel casing pipe w . ch will also act as the carrier pipe. Boring the storm sewer under Myrtle Street will gre tly reduce the expense of the project by reducing the street replacement costs and dis bance to other utilities. This method -df construction will, however, require four areas t which the contractor must disturl;> Myrtle Street to build manhole jacking pits. The co tractor will have to minimize the size of these areas by using sheeting because of the clos proximity of other inplace utilities. There are two abandoned ca ch basins at the intersection of Sixth Street and Myrtle which will be removed and replace and connected to the new storm sewer pipe. Traffic will be maintained 0 Myrtle Street during construction. Since Myrtle Street is 44 feet wide face of curb to face f curb, the contractor should be able to maintain two 12-foot lanes of traffic and minimiz traffic disruption. Design Methods The estimated volume and rate of runoff for the Myrtle Street ravine was modeled utilizing the SCS Runoff Cu e Number Method. The design storm used was a 100-year, e 24-hour duration rainfall. he term "100-year" is the return period or reoccurrence Myrtle Street Ravine Drainage Feasibility Report Page 2 e e e interval of this storm event. The return period is related to the probability of a given event being equal or exceeded. The probability that the:'lOO-:ye.cKeyent" will be exceeded in a given year is I percent. The SCS TR20 computer model calculated the peak discharge rates. A type 2 rainfall distribution was used to evaluate the freeboard "worst case" condition and determine the peak elevation of the pond and the peak outflow. The "type" of storm is a synthetic 24-hour rainfall distribution developed from available National Weather Service duration-frequency data for various parts of the country. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our analysis of the hydrology of the drainage area, existing conditions and site constraints, we recommend that the combination detention basin and storm sewer system be constructed as outlined in the report. Jacking the new storm sewer pipe in Myrtle Street will reduce the overall cost of the project and allow the project to be constructed while maintaining traffic. Detention basin construction is necessary to control the rate of flow out of the ravine to match the capacity of the downstream 27 -inch pipe. Construction of the new storm sewer outlet bypasses the undersized outlet which has caused numerous floodings in the past. It is recommended to abandon the two existing 24-inch and the 18-inch storm sewer outlet by blowing it full of sand so that any collapse would not produce a settlement. However, before the pipe is abandoned, it should be televised to verify the existence of any roof drain or sump pump serVIces. An easement will be required for the 36-inch storm sewer pipe from the east end of the dete~tion basin to Myrtle Street. SEH has estimated that construction of this project would cost $245,000. The estimated cost includes 35 percent for construction contingencies, administrative, engineering and legal fees. Myrtle Street Ravine Drainage Feasibility Report Page 3 . ._,_._~' .. .d' --" ,CC ~,,~- ,\..~\\'~'\ ""'"""'~' - --:to' .."'\" --~. -... -'" \//." - - -. ~ - ~!",.... ~ ~, "". -'-' ,'.)"' ,.t' /_______" ',~ \,./" 12 ~"\ ., ~ ~ . "'.. '_. ) y-:/../\ 6 " ~ ,/,' \'\ '/ ;', ~j"/ \. VI, ' 13 / \ \ ' ~ I~ ==''r~ ==.;, -.;. ~f ,\ \9'JJ~ \~S" \\~<;)~~. ~,~, 12 5';. :;A-' ' , , L \ I~\ '\ \~I ' "151: ,I , JF<i, ... <' '" \~ ' . .. "" rnJOE", -- \ 4 \' . T _~ -!. 1 ~\m~' en \ I'!> " ~ 1 .\ 1 ~ .01" ~ I' .' I I \ . ':' \;'.1 \\d. -,..6JJtj~ " /' ____ ~ ___1 ___ _-, -' 'l.- 19 ~ 2if \ I ,,1 I I , '" "i~ .. ..- -,0::' _'7 ~ ~ II! _ ,~" ~'( ,,' ".. .rr ,*,' \ _" ''1:,,' ~.l;'- / J' "\' ,,~;.. PROJEC1 LOCA.1\ON~' " '?; "c . /0"" ,\' . '" " J. '-'~ ,"~~. , ',_ .2.' .,-~. ' _' I' ._.1., In' . T P. ,'J L ~ ,*' l " , " _" ~ ~_~ ' ' ~3 ...-I-~ 'I -"'" ~~t -. ,,_'" . \'" ~'\.-4 ""i 4 't. _'. \ "" ---fa 2 ~ - _10 \ .!.- r' ;..c\ -' , 'Z ' '" ~ I __ _",,- '0 "'~, a:: -:U2 I~- '\ ~o..A ~\_- ; ~ 3 _'" '-'i; 2' \;l ~-.-,.J " ~.-\ - ~\ 1 ~ .... -~,,,,, ~ -~\2 ~~' Ll?-c ,1_'tI i~~ ~-l~ " 3 ~ to,.,:.',- '-"-s't-;r\" :' ., .> ~. ,-'<' . ..' ", _ I- \'11 \ ~ ,IlICE ... >(', -- ' \ 6 IS 16 - '1'5 ~Sl"--1 -2 \oJ . "" ~ " ~ _' Il E .. \ "I ",..,,' ~. . ' .. · "/"1 \ , ' , ~. L- r I. \ \ 1.1 ~. ",-J ~ 8-c,- '1' '6 :,,- \ __~~.~I~ ~~~1-'d ~ \-ri+ ?,', "~~, Wf,~;'-r:.. .,~--~ . /?(272j_ --6 ~ -;- ~-r-~ OR'l~A.loE ~EA. ,!, !- l)~ 'c,-,'--' r. ~li!,"' , -. 6 ' _ '" ~ 6 2- ' I ~~~\,,~~~I ?'.....6 / ',~_~~ ~' :'" ,. ,.... \ " \ -r. ~..Hi I 'Z \/ ~ .' "" ~ylY ~:... a .'Z '" Ei ,r ,,' " ~ ~ . ./' · ~ .. -- ,... ., .r" .. ,,;!.,, - ) [(0 . ' r .~ .~ - · 'J"" ,~,.-1 ,..-.-~. ~ ~ ~ ./ . ,,,I . J" ,'- " ,\' ,.,..-' l ' . ~ ",;- '" ' ~, '-' . ' '- _.. ,"_ ."~" cR. . v"" _, -. " ,,"', ~ l-.c-'-' -rov': ,-... /' .::y -6 _~ ~"\ _.:::-' 9 o-',/2"-....,,~ ~Io-, ;; ~i~9 ~IO " '10::'"' -.J;. /I ..1- t!-I"O.!- ~ ..!- ~ ,- " ' -,-- . I., ~ -"~ ' '" ' ic-'i, , nO"D' · ... · .""'.' ~ ,,',&-' \l..s1.'A-" l=-'irt DE@'l1\ON .." ~~.., 4.. )f~ 1 t?;\ ~~ ;] \ \ \\\ ~\ \ \{.~\:& ~'\\ \ \ ! ~~-~ · ,~;, _<L-- 7 \ >. _ . - ~ \ ., ~ ~ 2 ~ :. \ ., hi \ S1'. ~ /.Ft--=-..-l IS \'"2 ,\ \\' "'. ,~. 11,,,--:: ..~'( /} ,., · r- iI Q \ ' , . ,\\-~ - - . ~ 8\./t>-'\. _/ / ..~~ ,I-' r ". ,0 .,,' / . .. ..!-< .~_, '" '\ . I' \. .' ~ , / _ _ 6 'Oi' I" \~. lOA II I I' \ st.",,:.' ""'~ ~I '--. -;5, bt 51. h ~ ."+/ lA...' It · ' ,,<< , ",_ ".." _ T ~2 ,,' . .." .. . , '", -0- ti ' , ~ " '" ,/ ., : ~ !'! pl_ -' '" 1 ~ \ ., 2'- '~" C ,/,' \,/ ...."..--: ".!. 3 ~\ -t 2 t) ~ -' Wi 11: 1'1 1\\ \" /'; './'-;9/ ~5 ~~1.:~~'_;.1-~ ~, ~ · "~:E"',~:', · ~ ~ ,_ \ ",\ ..,48/~' _~: ',~~ ~~:....' " ~,~~~ ~~-:/ I~/ ~ , '" --;0,' .0 0; ',i-asJ-'--b \' v ' ~~ _\ 11. \ \, '"-''L\..AIlO''' .. 1 ,b .". ."" c " ~ c.'f. '/j ':, ,. ,.. '[ ", ,,,I' \ ;'. ' 'i"':' \ yo ~ " :J1, {, " '~" .\. \\ :j~ ~- 2--\ -- 1- .. ' " ~ \1., 18' ~'. '-:'\'~ '\'1 \ \'" i>.~~o"~'\. '\ \ \ I i'\ \', ,J:T.\ ~. '~ \-.' L,-,\ f f\\..E I M '(RiLE S1Rt:.-f.l Rt>. \IINt:.9~0' SIILL'H />.1t.R. M\NNt:.S01/>. ORG, LOC/>.1I0N M/>.r · ~'~ , _ ..-0<: \ ~ " e -- .-. ~a\ -:-~ARCt'TfCTSflPtfllNER5 I ata for MYRTLE STREET RAVINE RUN 2 repared by SHORT ELLIOT HENDRtCKSON, INC ydroCAD 3.01 000569 (c). 1986-1991 Applied Microcomputer Systems ATERSHED ROUTING ~~~~~~~~~==l~=~~===~~~~=-==~:~=~~=======~~~~~=~~~===~====~~.. ~ 05$1 1.- 1 torl#v~ )Li{4 1 GJ DUPl Page 1 8 Sep,92 ~\ ~g1 ,(.~ )\.1 ~~~ )~ o SUBCATCHMENT o REACH 6PGlD [J LINK 3UBCATCHMENT 1 -> POND 2 X,Y = 1.8 4.4 <1 2> 3UBCATCHMENT 2 -> POND 1 X,Y = 6.6 7.2 <1 1> e !?OND 1 -> REAC 1 X,Y = 6.8 4.4 <1 2> ?OND 2 -> POND 1 X,Y = 4.2 4.4 <1 2> e lata for MYRTLE STREET RAVINE RUN 2 DUPl 'repared. by SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON, INC :ydroCAD 3.01 000569 (c) 1986-1991 Applied Microcomputer Systems Page 2 8 Sep 92 e RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.9 IN, SCS U.H. UBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL .UMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (%CN)-- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 41. 50 34.8 100%74 74 99.5 12.24 9.82 2 3.70 3.8 100%75 75 17.9 11. 87 .91 e e ata for repared vdroCAD OND NO. 1 2 MYRTLE STREET RAVINE RUN 2 by SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON, INC 3.01 000569 (c) 1986-1991 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ~OUTfNG BY STOR-IND METHOD ~yp~ Z START FLOOD PEAK PEAK ---PEAK ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Qin FT FT FT AF CFS OUTLET DEVICES 1 2 DUPl Page 4 8 Sep ,92 e ATTEN. 817.0 824.0 821. 6 1.54 101.7 75.0 26 13.6 822.0 828.0 826.4 .17 99.5 99.4 o 1.2 e e lata for MYRTLE' STREET RAVINE RUN 2 DUPl lrepared. by SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON, INC :ydroCAD 3.01 000569 (c) 1986-1991 Applied Microcomputer Systems Page 8 8 Sep 92 e RUNOFF BY ses TR-20 METHOD: TYPE I 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.9 IN, ses U.H. UBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL 'UMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (%CN)-- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 41. 50 34.8 100%74 74 52.4 10.27 8.45 2 3.70 3.8 100%75. 75 4.6 10.00 .61 e e ata for MYRTLE STREET RAVINE RUN 2 DUPl repared by SHORT ELLIOT HENDR!CKSON, INC ydroCAD 3.01 000569 (c) 1986-1991 Applied Microcomputer Systems POND ROUT~NG BY STOR-IND METHOD i'lP';- I Page 10 8 Sep'92 e OND OUTLET NO. DEVICES 1 1 817.0 824.0 819.7 2 2 822.0 828.0 825.2 .74 53.8 47.1 .07 52.4 51.8 ATTEN. 12 9.2 1 2.2 e e MOCK ASSESSMENT ROLL STILLWATER, MINNESOTA MYRTLE STREET RAVINE DRAINAGE SEH 'FILE NO. 93034.00 10105/92 e TOTAL ACRES DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL EST. COST OF PROJECT RATE PER ACRE ASSESSMENT 39.63 $245,000.00 $6,182.19 e TOTAL PARCEL # OWNER ADDRESS AREA ASSESSMENT (AC) 9028 - 2320 O. Noland & K.E. Schumacher 3114 N Lexington, St. Paul 0.42 $2,596.52 9028 - 2400 Wallace O. Nelson Jr. 1 02 S. Harriet St. 0.1 $618.22 9028 - 2450 Harold M. Pauley 1386 Hilltop Ridge, Houlton, WI 0.04 $247.29 9028 - 2550 Guy Dilts MSD Co. 516 W. Myrtle St. Apt. #5 0.73 $4,513.00 9028 - 2555 Caroly & Michael C. Chamberlain 104 N. Harriet St. 0.19 $1,174.62 9028 - 2558 Mary S. & Guy Dilts Jr. 516 W. Myrtle St. 0.19 $1 ,174.62 9028 - 2560 Mary Beth & Donald J. Warling 112 N. Harriet 0.18 $1,112.79 9028 - 2568 DELETED 1 COMBINED WITH 9028-2558 0 $0.00 9028 - 2650 Margaret C. Charlsen 116 S. 6th St. 0.08 $494.57 9028 - 2700 Constance G. Christofferson 102 S. 6th St. 0.2 $1,236.44 9028 - 2750 Julia E. Crumley 1 08 S. 6th St. 0.14 $865.51 9028 - 2770 Catherine J. & Dale A. Preston 105 S. Harriet St. 0.09 $556.40 9028 - 2800 Beverty Enterprises-Minn. c/o Strategis, P.O. Box 98309, Atlanta, GA 1.36 $8,407.77 9028 - 2850 Greeley Street Partnership 14300 57th St. N. 0.39 $2,411.05 9028 - 2900 Brown's Ice Cream 2929 Univ. Ave. S., Mpls, MN 0.16 $989.15 9028 - 2950 Brown's Ice Cream 2929 Univ. Ave. S., Mpls, MN 0.13 $803.68 9028 - 3000 Alice & Ronald S. Schoenecker 904 W. Olive St. 0.18 $1,112.79 9028 - 3050 Hart James & Karin L. Thompson 908 W. Olive St. 0.17 $1,050.97 9028 - 3100 Suzanne & Michael E. McCarthy . 212 S. Greeley St. 0.36 $2,225.59 9028 - 3150 Murie & Charles A. Heitmiller 206 S. Greeley St. 0.35 $2,163.76 9028 - 3200 David W. Belideau 1001 Olive St. W. 0.11 $680.04 9028 - 3250 Laureen L. & Richard J. Estes 1007 W. Olive St. 0.11 $680.04 9028 - 3300 Mary Jane & Gary F. Sample 1015 Olive 0.23 $1 ,421.90 9028 - 3350 Luetta & Robert C. Croonquist 1008 Oak St. 0.13 $803.68 9028 - 3400 Jennifer & Jeffrey S. Lundeen 1002 Oak St. 0.11 $680.04 9326 - 2000 Ande J. & Muriel A. Hassis 122 S. 6th St. 0.07 $432.75 9326 - 2150 SAME AS 9028-2650 116 S. 6th St. . 0 $0.00 9326 - 2200 SAME AS 9028-2750 108 S. 6th St. 0 $0.00 9326 - 2250 SAME AS 9028-2700 102 6th St. 0 $0.00 11221 - 4050 Donna L. & Richard E. Wente 116 Everett St. 0.23 $1,421.90 11221 - 4100 Bradley J. Harvieux 115 N. William St. 0.29 $1,792.83 11221 - 4150 Borghild O. & Carl F. Risendal 110 Everett St. . .. 0.22 $1,360.08 11221 - 4200 Connie M. Koepp 109 N. William St. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 4250 Lewis A. Buschman 104 N. Everett 0.2 $1,236.44 11221 - 4300 Connie M. Koepp 109 N. William St. 0.07 $432.75 . 11221 - 4350 Don S. & Harriet F. Martin 718 Myrtle St. 0.07 $432.75 11221 - 4400 Don S. & Harriet F. Martin 718 Myrtle St. 0.12 $741.86 11221 - 4450 Jolene & Dennis R. Christensen 114 N. Martha St. 0.23 $1,421.90 11221 - 4500 Elaine M. & Robert C. Johnson 604 Myrtle St. 0.34 $2,101.94 11221 - 4550 Bettylue G. & James A. Sievert 618 W. Myrtle St. 0.2 $1,236.44 11221 - 4600 James A. Sievert 618 W. Myrtle 0.47 $2,905.63 11221 - 4700 Edmund S. & Joan L. Ziemek 125 N. Martha St. 0.06 $370.93 11221 - 4800 David Lagerstedt 121 N. Martha St. 0.09 $556.40 11221 - 4975 State of Minn MnlOOT 0.03 $185.47 11221 - 5000 Catherine J. & Dale A. Preston 105 S. Harriet St. 0.38 $2,349.23 11221 - 5050 Margaret C. Charlsen 116 S. 6th St. 0.21 $1,298.26 11221 - 5100 NONE 11221 - 5150 Lawrence J. Reed 17301 Unicorn St. NW 0.21 $1 ,298.26 11221 - 5200 Sharill K. Odenwald 128 S. Holcombe St. 0.34 $2,101.94 11221 - 5250 City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. 0.72 $4,451.17 11221 - 5300 Lorraine G. & Allen P. Zaspel 132 Holcombe St. 0.35 $2,163.76 11221 - 5400 DELETED DELETED 0 $0.00 11221 - 5425 Wallace O. Nelson Jr. P.O. Box 156 0.02 $123.64 11221 - 5450 Fredrick L. Kemper 1386 Hilltop Ridge 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 5500 Barry L. Torgerson 15244 N. Upper 63rd St. 0.24 $1,483.72 e 1I10CK ASSESSMENT ROLL )TILLWATER, MINNESOTA II1YRTlE STREET RAVINE DRAINAGE )EH FILE NO. 93034.00 10/05/92 TOTAL ACRES DRAINAGE AREA 39.63 e TOTAL EST. COST OF PROJECT $245,000.00 RATE PER ACRE ASSESSMENT $6,182.19 ..,. .....-., ....,-. TOTAL PARCEL # OWNER ADDRESS AREA ASSESSMENT AC 11221 - 5600 Wallace O. Nelson Jr. 102 S. Harriet St. 0.29 $1,792.83 11221 - 5650 Buck Jame & Carol Rae Mill son 112 S. Harriet St. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 5700 City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. 0.68 $4,203.89 11221 - 5750 Kathleen A. O'Brien 115 S. Martha St. 0.29 $1,792.83 11221 - 5800 DELETED DELETED 0 $0.00 11221 - 5850 DELETED DELETED 0 $0.00 11221 - 5900 DELETED DELETED 0 $0.00 11221 - 5950 DELETED DELETED 0 $0.00 11221 - 6000 Thomas S. St. Claire 607 W. Myrtle St. 0.18 $1,112.79 11221 - 6050 Calist & Raymond R. Stefan ki 603 Myrtle St. 0.18 $1,112.79 11221 - 6100 Debra K. & David M. Benja in 617 W. Myrtle St. 0.56 $3,462.02 11221 - 6150 Jean M. & Harold G. Brown 114 S. Martha St. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6200 Jean M. & Harold G. Brown 114 S. Martha St. 0.12 $741.86 11221 - 6250 Lillian Salyer Crase P.O. Box 7489 0.34 $2,101.94 11221 - 6260 Lillian Salyer Crase P.O. Box 7489 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6270 Lillian Salyer Crase P.O. Box 7489 0.27 $1,669.19 11221 - 6300 Matthew J. & Mona J. John n 709 W. Myrtle St. 0.08 $494.57 11221 - 6350 Ernest Eugene Bishop 703 W. Myrtle St. 0.17 $1,050.97 11221 - 6400 Julette A. & Stanley J. Mos' 717 Myrtle St. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6450 Hazel E. & Russell L. Bonse 719 Myrtle St. 0.12 $741.86 11221 - 6500 Matthew J. & Mona J. John n 709 W. Myrtle St. 0.09 $556.40 11221 - 6600 Matthew J. & Mona J. John n 709 W. Myrtle St. 0.04 $247.29 11221 - 6700 Kathryn F. & Carl W. John n 190 Northland Ave. 0.14 $865.51 e 11221 - 6750 Hazel E. & Russell L. Bonse 719 Myrtle St. 0.01 $61.82 11221 - 6800 Kathryn F. & Carl W. John n 190 Northland Ave. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6850 Matthew J. & Mona J. John on 709 W. Myrtle St. 0.04 $247.29 11221 - 6910 Kenneth F. Seefert Sr. 10003 N. Mendel Rd. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6920 Laura & Christopher M. Fi 111 William St. 0.28 $1,731.01 11221 - 6930 Kenneth F. Seefert Sr. 10003 N. Mendel Rd. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6940 City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. 0.14 $865.51 11221 - 6941 City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. 0.02 $123.64 11221 - 6950 Bonnie. E. & Gunnard A. Je en 810 W. Olive St. 0.08 $494.57 11221 - 7000 Margare & John H. Rheinb rger 818 Olive St. 0.12 $741.86 ...... 11230 - 2000 Michael C. Wood 126 N. Martha St. 0.2 $1,236.44 11230 - 2050 Paula May & Embert R. Jo nson 611 W. Rice St. 0.19 $1,174.62 11230 - 2070 Rory J. Kaphing 615 W. Rice St. 0.15 $927.33 11230 - 2100 Brenda S. & Rickey Yelle 619 W. Rice St. 0.11 $680.04 11230 - 2150 Elizabeth & Robert L. Kras 126 Everett St. 0.13 $803.68 11230 - 2200 Elizabeth & Robert L. Kras e 126 Everett St. 0.13 $803.68 11230 - 2250 Sally B. Schmaltz 202 Everett 0.26 $1,607.37 11230 - 2300 Bonita L. & Kenneth R. Me er 208 Everett St. 0.13 $803.68 11230 - 2350 Charles H. Reich 210 N. Everett St. 0.13 $803.68 11230 - 2400 Gloria M. & Norris M. Swag r 110 Lakeside Dr. 0.13 $803.68 11230 - 2450 Teresa & Stephen F. Mikut wski 205 William St. N. 0.26 $1,607.37 11230 - 2500 Audrey & Leonard B. Bergl nd 129 William 0.2 $1,236.44 11230 - 2550 Jack G. Johnson 510 S. Broadway 0.2 $1,236.44 11230 - 2800 0.17 $1,050.97 11580 - 2950 Bernice H. & Lee T. Ander on 356 Ramsey St. 0.11 $680.04 11580 - 3000 Wendy Witt & Brent M. Joh son 212 S. 6th St. 0.21 $1,298.26 11580 - 3050 Ruth Alice Alliband 41001iveSt.W. 0.03 $185.47 e 11580 - 3100 Sheryl Hamberger Shea 406 W. Olive St. 0.36 $2,225.59 9145 - 2000 Stephan A. Ridgway 702W. Olive St. 0.18 $1,112.79 9145 - 2050 Victoria M. & Paul R. Glas 710 Olive St. 0.13 $803.68 9145 - 2100 Ronald K. Schroeder 724 Olive St. 0.1 $618.22 MOCK ASSESSMENT ROLL STILLWATER, MINNESOTA MYRTLE STREET RAVINE DRAINAGE SEH FILE NO. 93034.00 10/05/92 e TOTAL ACRES DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL EST. COST OF PROJECT RATE PER ACRE ASSESSMENT 39.63 $245,000.00 $6,182.19 TOTAL PARCEL # OWNER ADDRESS AREA ASSESSMENT lAC) 9145 - 2150 Johnson Lour & Mary J. Oswald 728 W. Olive St. 0.1 $618.22 9145 - 2200 Rita & Orlan M. Youngren 804 Olive St. 0.27 $1,669.19 9145 - 2250 Bonnie E. & Gunnard A. Jensen 810 W. Olive St. 0.2 $1,236.44 9145 - 2300 Nancy R. & Roger L. Hoffman 911 N. Owens 0.23 $1,421.90 9145 - 2350 Margare & John H. Rheinberger 818 Olive St. 0.25 $1,545.55 9145 - 2600 Jeanette & Keith W. Mickelson 805 Olive St. W. 0.25 $1 ,545.55 9145 - 2650 Molly M. & Frank R. Stewart 809 W. Olive St. 0.19 $1,174.62 9145 - 2700 Janice J. & Bruce W. Kramer 813 Olive St. 0.19 $1,174.62 9145 - 2750 Janice J. & Bruce W. Kramer 813 Olive St. 0.09 $556.40 9145 - 2800 Kelly O. & Arthur H. Bjorkman 819 W. Olive St. 0.03 $185.47 9145 - 2850 Kelly O. & Arthur H. Bjorkman 819 W. Olive St. 0.14 $865.51 9695 - 3450 Mary Jane & Gary F. Sample 1015 Olive 0.4 $2,472.87 9695 - 3500 Robert J. Jantschek 1018 W. Olive St. 0.44 $2,720.16 9329 - 2200 Kathryn L. Doe 804 Pine St. 0.26 $1,607.37 9329 - 2250 Judi Schiks & Dewey P. Miller 810 W. Pine St. 6.28 $1,731.01 9329 - 2300 Eleanor & Paul Jones 818 Pine St. 0.28 $1,731.01 9329 - 2350 Oerene & Carl Gregory Quist 820 Pine 0.26 $1,607.37 9329 - 2400 Michelle M. & David G. Hueller 722W. Pine St. 0.33 $2,040.12 9329 - 2500 Mary L. & Joseph A. Junker 415 S. William St. 0.24 $1,483.72 9329 - 2550 Veronica H. & Donald G. Hill 6387 25th St. 0.24 $1,483.72 9329 - 2770 City of Stillwater 216 N. 4th St. 0.07 $432.75 9329 - 2850 Mary E. & Robert F. Zoller 721 W. Oak St. 0.02 $123.64 e 9790 - 2000 Deborah A. Larry J. Belisle 402 William St. 0.27 $1,669.19 9790 - 2050 Mary C. & Thomas J. Huelsmann 401 Greeley St. 0.27 $1,669.19 9790 - 2100 Velva Jo Hausken 410 S. William 0.14 $865.51 9790 - 2200 Gail M. Stiles 407 Greeley St. 0.14 $865.51 9790 - 2150 Christopher C. & Jack C. Felix 413 S. Greeley 0.14 $865.51 9790 - 2250 Barbara Jean Hepola 418 William St. 0.29 $1,792.83 9790 - 2300 Anita M. & Tracy N. Tuenge 422 S. William St. 0.14 $865.51 9790 - 2350 Linda Louise Oevabis 419 Greeley St. 0.29 $1,792.83 9790 - 2400 Joann & Patrick A. Poshek 904 Pine St. W. .. 0.32 $1,978.30 9790 - 4400 Allen A. Ulrich 920 W. Pine St. 0.32 $1 ,978.30 11550 - 2000 Ruth Alice Alliband 410 Olive St. W. 0.09 $556.40 11550 - 2050 Amy E. Larson 504 Olive St. W. 0.21 $1,298.26 11550 - 2100 Claudine & Donald H. Will 510 Olive St. 0.21 $1,298.26 11550 - 2150 Madeline E. & David H. Rogers 518 W. Olive St. 0.23 $1,421.90 11550 - 2200 Lois S. & John A. Rustad 602 Olive St. 0.31 $1,916.48 11550 - 2250 Glen E. Johnson 5749 Lake Elmo Ave. N. 0.25 $1,545.55 11550 - 2300 Mary E. Nitz 616 W. Olive 0.26 $1,607.37 11550 - 2350 Renee L. & Howard A. Weekley III 622 W. Olive St. 0.2 $1,236.44 11550 - 2400 Michael W. Haslup 626 W. Olive St. 0.24 $1 ,483.72 11550 - 2450 Charles Donnelly 628 W. Olive St. 0.16 $989.15 11551 - 2200 Martha B. Eckberg 808 W. Oak St. 0.33 $2,040.12 11551 - 2300 K.A. & Matthew R. Hammerschmidt 816 Oak St. 0.3 $1,854.66 11551 - 2350 Donald H. Roettger 824 W. Oak St. 0.12 $741.86 11551 - 2600 Minnie & Edwin J. Larson 807 Oak St. 0.32 $1,978.30 11551 - 2650 Margaret G. Langmack 815 W. Oak St. 0.23 $1 ,421.90 11551 - 2700 Pamela M. & Peter L. Schmidt 819 W. Oak St. 0.27 $1,669.19 9800 - 2450 Emil J. & Dorothy Vollmer 208 William 0.15 $927.33 9800 - 2500 Charles A. & Joan M. Wold 211 N. Greeley 0.15 $927.33 9800 - 2550 Emil J. & Dorothy Vollmer 208 William 0.15 $927.33 e e e ....saJ 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, Sf PAUL, MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION September 7, 1993 RE: Stillwater, Minnesota City Engineer SEH File No. A-STILL9401.00 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Council Members: The mayor requested information regarding the 1993 Street Maintenance Program, the 1993 Sidewalk Program (L.I. 274) and the study requested by the Council for various detention basins throughout the City. e The 1993 Street Maintenance Program has been completed. The Seal Coating Program was completed as scheduled. However, we have not reconciled the cost with Washington County at this time. We will be reconciling this cost with Washington County for the City within the next two weeks. We will begin preparation of the 1994 Street Maintenance Program with Public Works this fall such that decisions can be made early winter of 1993-94. The 1993 Sidewalk Program plans and specifications are complete and we will be asking for approval of the plans and specifications and ordering the Ad for Bid to receive bids on October 5, 1993. We have divided the sidewalk program into three areas such that contractors can bid on either one area or all three. This should provide the ability for smaller contractors to participate in this sidewalk program. We are including a memorandum from our Water Resources Department regarding the pond studies. These detention basins were designed a number of years ago, and I believe that with the increased rain and runoff that we have had this year, the water levels are up, but they are functioning properly. However, a study should be conducted to review the pond outlets and maintenance, etc. that has been provided for these detention basins. We propose to do an initial investigation at an engineering cost of $1,500.00 for three detention basins, which will gather all of the information from past design, review the outlets, do a field inspection and make recommendations whether a more complete study is required or not. If a more complete study is required, then a work plan development and implementation would be provided with a feasibility study outlining any capital improvements that may be required. The second step, which would be the feasibility study, would then be addressed and a scope of work provided for the Council. This feasibility study would include any capital improvements and the engineering cost is estimated to be between $2,000.00 and $3,500.00 per detention basin. _ Since I am not sure at this point that any additional work other than maintenance will be SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST. CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI e e e Honorable Mayor and City Council September 7, 1993 Page2 required on each detention basin, I would recommend that the City proceed with the initial investigation to determine the increased runoff, if there is any, and the function of the detention basins. I'll be pleased to cover these three subjects with the Council at the Council Meeting this evening. Sincerely, Q~ ~P-tv4?_-- Richard E. Moore, P.E. City Engineer REM/kam Enclosure c: David Junker, Director of Public Works Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator Diane Deblon, City Finance Director e e e Memorandum To: Dick Moore From: Mark Lobermeier Date: August 31,1993 Subj: Stillwater Pond Analysis Following a review of the background information you provided for Heiforts Pond, Pizinger Pond & Deer Path Pond, I have developed a two-step approach for investigating pond performance. Step 1 - Initial Investigation The first step, initial investigation, involves the collection of all existing information regarding pond construction and design, primarily from SEH files. Other information such as DNR data and drainage system asbuilts will also be obtained. A summary of available data will be developed. Next, each pond will be investigated in the field. The field investigation will include walking the perimeter of each pond, observing inlets and outlets, photographing and recording critical areas, measuring critical elevations and dimensions of culverts and visiting with neighbors regarding pond performance. The cost-per-pond for the initial investigation is $500, or a total of $1,500. Step 2 - Work Plan Development & Implementation Based on the results of the initial investigation, a work plan for complete analysis of pond performance will be developed. The work plan could include a description of the contributing watershed, analysis of the pond area and volume, and preparation of a computer model to estimate pond response to runoff. Much of this information can be reused from existing files. Following completion of the work plan, we will prepare an estimate of cost for completing the work plan elements and preparing a brief letter report describing our findings, recommendations and approximate costs of capital improvements. The cost for Step 2 will vary from pond to pond, based on the extent of existing information and the magnitude of the existing problem. Once the work plan is complete, a detailed estimate of cost will be submitted to the City for review and approval. For the sake of estimating today, the costs for Step 2 could vary from $2,000 - $3,500 per pond. If capital improvements are recommended based on the better report, a more detailed feasibility study will be prepared for the City. We are ready to proceed with the initial investigation at your convenience. MLL/ cih e e e 09/02/93 16:10 FAX -tH STILLWATER IaJ 0021002 SEH ST. PAUL ~SeJ 353.5 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE. 200 SEH CENTER. sr PAUl.. MN 55110 612490.2000 800 325-2055 ARCHITEC1VRf:: ENGINEERING ENVtRONME;NtAL TRANSPQRTA TION September 2, 1993 RE: Stillwater, Minnesota City Engineer SEH File No. A-STILL 9401.00 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Stillwater 216 N. Fourth Street Stillwater, 'MN 55082~4898 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As. requested by the Mayor on Thursday, September 2, 1993, we will provide the Council with an update on the Street Maintenance Program as completed-this year, the 1993 Sidewalk Program and the study on the various detention basins throughout the City. I will present additional detailed information to the Council as a part of the agenda at the 7:00 p.m. meeting on Tuesday, September 7,1993. SincZ)1 ~" ,..- . u ;;-,.,1 a;7I~7r1.f' -v:ra.-~"C ('-71~(/1J ~ Richard E- Moore, P.E. .. City Engineer REM/kam SNORT ELLIOTT e e e -''t TO: FR: DA: RE: MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council City Coordinator September 1, 1993 1993 LABOR AGREEMENT - POLICE Accompanying this memo is the 1993 Labor Agreement for Teamsters Local No. 320 - Police. The union has accepted the City's previous offer and the agreement is consistent with the City's offer. Approval is recommended. <'. q(~ " '-- il~ater _ . HtQ)[p"1{ . THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~ June 30, 1993 Mr. Larry Bastian Business Agent Teamsters Local No. 320 3001 University Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55414 Dear Mr. Bastian: The City of Stillwater makes the final offer for settlement of the labor agreement for 1993: 1. Amend salari s effective January 1, 1993 as follow: Top Patrol Police Sgt. Juv Off/Inv/ $3,264 per month $ 282 over top patrol $ 128 over top patrol e 2. Amend Articl 22.1 (Insurance) to read as follows: Effective Ja uary 1, 1993, the employer will contribute up to Two Hundred Nine y dollars ($290) per month per employee toward group health and long-term disability insurance including dependent coverage. In the event the premium for dependent health insurance increases beyond the 0 Hundred and Ninety dollars ($290) per month, the employer sha 1 contribute 50 percent of the increase. 3. Term of agre ent shall be from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993. Please let me know if the offer is acceptable and I will prepare a new agreement. Sincerely, #d!fc.~ City Coordinator e NLK/smc CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 .. DR~fl ~/ LABOR A.GRE"E.~wr B"E.'rW"E."E.~ TtiE- C1.~ O"F ST1.u..~T"E.R 1\,l'lD >I'''''''SO''''' 'l%A"s'!ERS l'UllL,C Al'TI 1)'IIl t;NE'OR~ J;>l1'lPYBES' mnON. LQCAlo NO. 320 e e JanUarY 1. 1993 through oecettber 31. 1993 , TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT 1 e II 1 III 1 IV 2 V 2 VI 3 VII - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 3 VIII 7 IX SENIORI 7 X 8 XI CONSTI PROTECTION 9 XII OVERT I 9 XIII 9 e XIV 10 XV CLASSIFICATION 10 XVI 10 XVII PAY 14 .- XVIII 14 XIX 14 XX 15 XXI 15 XXII /EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE 15 XXIII 17 XXIV MILITAR LEAVE 17 XXV WAIVER 18 XXVI HOURS 0 EMPLOYMENT 18 e XXVII DURATIO 18 APPENDI A - WAGE SCHEDULE 20 e ARTICLE I LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER AND MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES' UNION, -LOCAL NO. 320 PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into as of January 1, 1993 between the City of Stillwater, hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320, hereinafter called the UNION. 1.1 1.2 1.3 e ARTICLE II 2.1 2.2 ARTICLE III 3.1 e It is the intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT to: Assure sound and mutually beneficial working and economic relationships between the parties hereto; Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT'S interpretation and/or application; and Place in written form the parties' agreement upon the terms and conditions of employment for the duration of the AGREEMENT. RECOGNITION The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNION as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179.71, Subdivision 3, for all police personnel in the following job classifications: POLICE OFFICER POLICE SERGEANT JUVENILE_OFFICER INVESTIGATOR In the event the EMPLOYER and the UNION are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. DEFINITIONS UNION: The Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union, Local No. 320. 1 3.2 UNION MEMBER: Enforcement U A member of the Minnesota Teamsters Public Law Local No. 320. e 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A ember of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 DEPARTMENT: he City of Stillwater Police Department. 3.5 EMPLOYER: Th City of Stillwater. 3.6 CHIEF: ief of the City of Stillwater Police Department. 3.7 UNION OFFICER: Off icer elected or appointed by the Minnesota Teamsters Pub ic and Law Enforcement Employees -Union, Local No.. 320. 3.8 OVERTIME: rk performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in e of the employee's scheduled shift. 3.9 SCHEDULED SHI T: A consecutive work period including two rest breaks and a unch break. 3.10 REST BREAKS: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee rema"ns on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.11 LUNCH BREAKS: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee rema ns on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.12 e PROBATIONARY probationary Probationary the EMPLOYER. PERIOD: Newly hired employees shall serve a one year (12 months from the date of hire). mployees-may be terminated at the sole discretion of ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SE The UNION agrees tha during the life of this AGREEMENT it will not cause, encourage, partici ate in or support any strike, slow-down or other interruption of or i terference with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE V 5.1 The EMPLOYER the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all facilities and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizationa structure; to select, direct and determine the number e 2 e 5.2 ARTICLE VI 6.1 6.2 e 6.3 6.4 ARTICLE VII 7.1 7.2 e of personnel; to establish work schedules and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited to this AGREEMENT. Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish or eliminate. UNION SECURITY The EMPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly UNION dues or a "fair share" deduction as provided by Minnesota Statutes 179.65, Subdivision 2, if the employee elects not to become a member of the UNION. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the UNION. The UNION may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a Steward and an alternate and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice and changes in the position of Steward and/or alternate. The EMPLOYER shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting UNION notices and announcements. The UNION agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders or judgments brought or issued against the EMPLOYER as a result of any action taken or not taken by the EMPLOYER under the provisions of this Article. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT. UNION REPRESENTATIVES The EMPLOYER will recognize representatives designated by the UNION as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION 3 shall notify fhe EMPLOYER in writing of~he names of such UNION representativ s and of their successors when ,,so - designated, as e provided by S of this AGREEMENT. 7.3 PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE It is recogniz d and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employee and shall therefore d during normal working hours only when consistent employee and The aggrieved with such e loyee duties and responsibilities. UNION representative shall be allowed a reasonable without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided the employee a d the UNION representative have notified and received the approval f the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work Step 1. employee claiming q violation concerning the terpretation or application of this AGREEMENT shall, w'thin twenty-one calendar days after such alleged v' olation has occurred, present such. ,grievance to the . ". defined in Section 7.1 shall be resolved in e 7.4 of the EMPLO PROCEDURE Grievances conformance I' loyee's supervisor as designated by the EMPLOYER. EMPLOYER - designated representative will discuss give an answer to such step 1 grievance within ten 0) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not and appealed in Step 2 shall be writing setting forth the nature - of the ievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision provisions of the AGREEMENT allegedly violated, the r medy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within t n (10) calendar days after the EMPLOYER-designated final answer in step 1. Any grievance e 4 e not appealed in writing to step 2 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated step 2 Representative. The EMPLOYER-designated Representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER's step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten ( 10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated Representative I s final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 3 Representative. The EMPLOYER-designated Representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated Representative I s final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be consiaered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3. and appealed to Step 4 by the UNION shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance.with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances," as established by the Public Employment Relations Board. 7.5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY A. The arbitrator shall have not have the right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to or subtract from the terms and e e 5 conditi ns of this AGREEMENT. The arbitrator shall consider only the specific issue( s) submitted in writing by the EMPL YER and the UNION and shall have no authority to make a decis'on on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arb'trator shall be without power to make decisions to or inconsistent with or modifying or varying in application of laws, rules or regulations having e be subm"tted in writing within thirty (30) days following the the hearing or the transmission of briefs by the whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extensi The decision shall be binding on both the EMPLOYER shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpr tation or application of the express terms of the AGRE~ and to the facts of the grievance presented. The feels. and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceed'ngs shall be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each party shall be responsible for compens ting its own representatives and witnesses. If either party d sires a verbatim record or the proceedings it may cause s ch a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceed ngs, the cost shall be shared equalJ,.y. 7.6 WAIVER any the e and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall c. e If a grievanc is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it sh 11 be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to t e next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extens on thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLOYER I S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a grie ance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and imme iately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the EMPLO and the UNION in each step. e 6 7.7. CHOICE OF REMEDY e If, as a result of the written EMPLOYER response to step 3 the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to step 4 of Article VII or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VII, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 of Article VII. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which' procedure is to be utilized, Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article VII. ARTICLE VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Stillwater. In the event any provision of this e AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be void. All other provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written request of either .. party. ARTICLE IX 9.1 9.2 SENIORITY Seniority shall be determined by the employee's length of continuous employment with the Police Department and posted in an appropriate location. Seniority rosters may be maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. During the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharged at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. During the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be replaced in their previous position at the sole discretion of the e EMPLOYER. 7 .e A reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shal~ be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. An employee 0 layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two (2 years of the time of their layoff before any new employee is hi ed. 9.4 Senior employ s will be given preference with regard to transfer, job classifica ion assignments and promotions when the job relevant 9.3 9.5 ARTICLE X 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 ~ 10.5 10.6 qualifications of employees are equal. Senior employees shall be preference eighteen ( 18) months employment. given shift assignment of continuous full-time The Discipline a) oral b) c) d) e) will discipline employees. for just cause only. one or more of the following forms: reprimand; e ; or and discharges will be in written form. Suspensions, Written repro ands, notices of suspension and notices of discharge which are to ecome part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and ackn wledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the UNION receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. Employees examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable ti es under direct supervision of the EMPLOYER. Discharges wi 1 be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. Employees wil disciplinary opportunity not be questioned concerning an investigation of action unless the employee has been given an o have a UNION representative present at such questioning. e 8 e 10.7 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the UNION in step 3 of the Grievance Procedure under Article VII. ARTICLE XI CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United states and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE XII 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 e 12.5 12.6 OVERTIME Employees will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes in shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. Overtime refused by employees .will, for recordkeeping purposes under Article 12.2, be considered as unpaid overtime worked. For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifteen minutes. Employees requesting in writing to the EMPLOYER to receive compensatory time off in lieu of paid overtime as established by Section 12. 1 of this Article shall be allowed such. compensatory time at a time mutually agreeable between the employee and the Police Chief. Carry over of compensatory time off shall be at the sole discretion of the Police Chief. Any compensatory time not taken or not authorized to be carried over by December 31st of each calendar year shall be paid off on that date. ARTICLE XIII COURT TIME An employee who is required to appear in court on their scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1- 1/2) times the employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regular scheduled shift for court appearances. does not qualify the e 9 i employee for the twd (2) hour minimum. J e ARTICLE XIV An employee shall to duty during their scheduled off-duty time of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee' base pay rate. An extension of or early report to shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour min" ARTICLE XV WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Employees assigned br the EMPLOYER to assume the full responsibilities and authority of a highe job classification for one work period or more shall receive the salary chedule of the higher classification. ARTICLE XVI SICK 16.1 EMPLOYEES HI PRIOR TO APRIL 24, 1989 e All ful -time employees shall, after a term of employment of six (6) months, be qualified to receive payments on account of phys cal disability to work by reasons of sickness. For the pu of this contract s~ckness shall include injury an accident or injury arising out of and in the course ent by the City. Sickness disability benefits shall a. be as 1. 2. r 3. 4. 5. I term of employment has been six (6) months, but less t an two (2) years, one (1) week at full pay. I term of employment has been 2 to 5 years, full pay f r four (4) weeks, half pay for nine .(9) weeks. I term of employment has been 5 to 10 years, full pay f r thirteen (13) weeks, half pay thirteen (13) weeks. I term of employment has been 10 to 15 years, full pay r thirteen (13) weeks, half pay for thirty-nine (39) term of employment has been 15 to 20 years, full pay r twenty six (26) weeks, half pay for twenty-six (26) e 10 " e weeks. If term of employment has been 20 to 25 years, full pay- for thirty-nine (39) weeks, half pay for thirteen (13) weeks. 7. If term of employment has been 25 years or more, full pay for fifty-two (52) weeks. b. No disability benefits shall be paid for absence in excess of three (3) consecutive days without a doctor's certification as to sickness. 6. e c. Successive periods of sickness disability shall be counted together as one period in computing the period during which the employee shall be entitled to benefits, except that nay sickness occurring after an employee has been continually engaged in the performance of duty for one year shall be considered as a new sickness and not part of any disability which preceded such period of one year. d. Any employee who is receiving Worker's Compensation benefits because of job connected injury or sickness shall, if the employee assigns their check to the City of Stillwater, receive full wages for that period. Of, if the employee is receiving Worker's Compensation and does not assign their check, the employee will be paid for the difference between the Worker's Compensation allowance and their regular weekly pay. Sick leave shall then be figured on.=a prorated basis with no deduction of leave being made for that portion of the employee's absence which is covered by Worker's Compensation. e. For the purpose of this Article, sick leave shall accrue in accordance with the schedule in Section 16.1 on the January 1st immediately preceding the anniversary date of employment. 16.2 Sick leave will be suspended after benefits have been exhausted. However, an employee who has fulfilled all of the requirements for vacation which has not been taken may request vacation pay during disability. After all sick leave benefits have been exhausted any disabled employee may apply, in writing, for an authorized leave of e 11 absence which Lhen added to the per.iod for Wh.iCh. be. ne. f i.. ts... ..h. a... v. e.... b.. e.....e.n e paid shall n+t exceed one year. Such. apP1.icat:i.on.. ~hall . .b~ accompanied b a physician's certificate to the effect that such ee has not been able to return to work. Upon return the employee shall retain all accumulated service worked prior to the employee's disability but shall receive no se ice credit for the period of absence. 16.3 EMPLOYEES HI D AFTER APRIL 24, 1989 1. All ful -time employees hired after April 24, 1989 shall, after a term of employment of one year, be qualified to receive payments on account of physical disability to work by reason sickness. For the purpose of this Contract, sicknes shall include injury other than accidental injury arising and in the course of employment by the City. Sicknes benefits shall be as follows: a. I term of employment has been one year but less than t one week of full pay. e I~ term of employment has been 2 to 5 years - full pay 4lweeks; half pay 9 weeks. c. I term of employment has. been 5 to 10 years - full pay b. 1 weeks; half pay 13 weeks. d. I term of employment has been 10 to 15 years - full pay weeks; half pay 39 weeks. e. term of employment has been 15 to 20 years - full pay weeks; half pay 26 weeks. term of employment has been 20 - 25 years - full pay f. weeks; half pay 13 weeks. g. term of employment has been 25 years or more - full y 52 weeks. 2. No dis ility benefits shall be paid for absences in excess 3. consecutive days without a doctor's certificate as ess disability. disability benefits usage shall be subject to the followi g conditions: of to e 12 e e e 4. a. An employee may use the full entitlement only once annually. b. Any days used by an employee must be replaced at the following earning rate: employee shall earn sickness disabili ty leave at the rate of two shifts for each month worked. c. Sickness disability leave time cannot be earned during the time an employee is on sick leave. d. Sickness disability leave time shall be earned as a replacement for used leave time by only those employees who have utilized the benefit. Any employee receiving Worker's Compensation benefits because of job connected injury or sickness shall, if he assigns his check to the City, receive full wages for that period. Or, if the employee is receiving Worker's Compensation and does not assign their check, the employee will be paid for the difference between the Worker I s Compensation allowance and their regular weekly pay. Sick leave shall than be figured on a prorated basis with no deduction of leave being made for that portion of the employee's absence which is covered by Worker's Compensation insurance. Sick leave shall not be granted if the absence is due to an injury resulting from intoxication or from fighting. Sick leave will be suspended after beh~fits have been exhausted; however, an employee who has xulfilled all of the requirements for a vacation which has not been taken may request vacation pay during disability. After all sick leave benefits have been exhausted, any disabled employee may apply in writing for an authorized leave of absence without pay; provided that the period of such leave when added to the period during which benefits have bee~paid shall not exceed one (1) year. Such application shall be accompanied by a physician's certificate stating that such disabled employee had not been.able to return to work. Upon 5. 6. 13 return to active employment, the employee shall retain all I accumul~ted service credit for time worked prior to his disabil+ty, but shall receive no such credit for the period of abse ceo e ARTICLE XVII One-half of unused isability benefits shall be granted as severance pay upon retirement du to age or physical disability to employee having completed not less han ten (10) years of service with the city. In the event of death whil still employed, the surviving spouse, if any, or if no surviving spouse, minor children, if any, shall be entitled to such severance pay in th same amount as though such employee had retired due to age or physical is ability , as provided above, but in no event shall such death benefit xceed sixty (60) days of full pay. ARTICLE XVIII HOLIDAY 18.1 Employee shal be entitled to eleven (11) paid holidays per year. 18.2 Holiday pay s all be made the first pay day in the month of December of each year. 18.3 The hourly ra e for holiday pay shall be computed on a forty (40) hour week or ne hundred seventy-three (173) hours per month. 18.4 Any employee equired to work on any of the following holidays shall be granted an additional one-half (1/2) times.the employee's base pay rate to regular pay and holidayp~y for the entire shift in rec of said holiday. 's Day July 4th Thanksgiving Day Day Labor Day Christmas Day 18.5 Immediately p eceding the 1st anniversary date of employment the employee sha 1 be entitled to one additional floating holiday without holid y pay. e ARTICLE XIX 19.1 VACATIOr Permanent emp oyees shall be entitled to the following schedule: From Othru 1 months employment 5/6 day per month e 14 e From 1 year thru 4 years employment After 4 years thru 10 years employment After 10 years thru 15 years employment After 15 years 10 days per year 15 days per year 20 days per year One (1) additional day for each year up to twenty years for a maximum of 25 days. 19.2 Vacation shall accrue on the January 1st immediately preceding the anniversary date of employment and must be taken within one (1) year except that after five (5) years employment, one (1) week of vacation may be carried over into the next year. There shall be a maximum of six (6) weeks vacation during anyone (1) calendar year. 19.3 One continuous vacation period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until March 1st of each calendar year. ARTICLE XX UNIFORMS The EMPLOYER shall provide required uniform articles and equipment, including Juvenile Officer clothing. e ARTICLE XXI 21.1 INSURANCE Effective January 1, 1993, the EMPLOYER will contribute up to Two Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($290) per month per employee toward group health and long-term disability insurance including dependent 21.2 coverage. __ In the event the premium for dependent health insurance increases beyond the Two Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($290) per month, the EMPLOYER shall contribute fifty percent (50%) of the increase. Ten dollars ($10) of the maximum stated in 21.1 may be utilized to provide an employee dental insurance program for all unit employees if the UNION notifies the EMPLOYER that the unit employees desire such coverage. The EMPLOYER will provide a $15,000 term life insurance policy for each employee. 21.3 e 15 e ARTICLE XXII LONGEVITX/EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE I 22.1. All full-time employees hired prior to April 24, 1989 shall be eligible to r ceive longevity/educational incentive pay according to g schedules: A. LONGEVI PAY 1) loyees shall choose to be paid supplementary pay sed on education credits as outlined in Section 22.1B this Article or monthly longevity pay as follows: Patrol Juvenile Off/ Officer Investigator Sergeant After 4 years continuous ern $ 79.59 $ 82.65 $ 85.74 After 8 years continuous em $132.65 $137.75 $142.90 of loyment $185.72 $192.85 $200.06 of loyment $238.78 $247.95 $257.22 B. 2) T ese dollar amounts will be paid for longevity until s ch time as the dollar amount generated by the longevity p y program for other City employees equals or exceeds t ese amounts. At that time, the longevity pay program i effect for other City employees will be adopted for e a 1 employees. PAY 1) Af er twelve (12) months of continuous employment, each shall be eligible to receive pay as follows: Educati n Credits stated in s of College rter Credits 5 - 89 o - 134 35 - 179 80 or more Pay Increments Years of Service One Two Three $ 63.67 $ 71.63 $ 79.59 106.12 119.39 132.65 148.57 167.14 185.72 191.02 214.89 238.78 e 16 e Not all courses are to be eligible for credit. Courses receiving qualifying credits must be job related.._ .(Thus, a 4 year degree is not automatically 180 credits -- or a 2 year certificate is not automatically 90 credits.) Job related courses plus those formally required to enter such courses shall be counted. If Principles of Psychology (8 credits) is required before taking Psychology of Police Work (3 credits), completion of these.courses.would yield a total of 11 qualifying credits. C. E. U.'s (Continuing Education Units) in job related seminars, short courses, institutes, etc., shall also be counted. The EMPLOYER shall determine which courses are job related. Disputes are grievable based on the criteria outlined in the award of Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services Case NO. 78- PN-370-A. e C. Employees.may choose supplementary pay either for length of service or for educational credits no more often than once every twelve (12) months. 22.2 For all employees hired after April 24, 1989, monthly longevity pay shall be established as follows, based on top patrol: a. $71.75 per month after 5 years through 10 years. b. c. $143.50 per month after 10 years through 15 years. $215.25 per month after 15 years through twenty years. $258.30 per month after twenty years and th-ereafter. d. ARTICLE XXIII UNION STEWARD The EMPLOYER agrees that the employee designate Steward under Article 6.2 of this AGREEMENT shall be allowed a maximum of forty (40) hours of duty time annually to attend to UNION matters as designated by the UNION in addition to the other Steward activities as provided for in this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE XXIV MILITARY LEAVE The EMPLOYER agrees to allow military leave as provided by Minnesota Statutes. e 17 ARTICLE XXV 25.1 25.2 WAIVER Any and all ior agreements, resolutions, practices; policies;'Hc~ rules and regu ations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby sup rseded. The parties mu ually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in his AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition 0 employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly aives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this AGRE T or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though s ch terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge ntemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this act was negotiated or executed. e e ARTICLE XXVII The AGREEMENT shall full force and effect for a period commencing January 1, 1993 thr In the event a new AGREEMENT is not in effect Jan all compensation, working conditions and benefits shall rema n in effect as set forth in this AGREEMENT until a successor AGREEMENT is effected. average forty (40) hours per week. ARTICLE XXVI The work e 18 e e e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENt on this _day of ,1993. FOR THE CITY OF STILLWATER: FOR TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 320: .13 APPENDIX A e WAGE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 1993, the following wage schedule shall be in effect: start After 6 months After 12 months After 24 months After 36 months Police Sergeant $282 per month over the T p Patrol (36 month) rate. Juvenile $128 per month over the T Patrol (36 month) rate. I!. V 70% of Top Patrol 75% of Top Patrol 80% of Top Patrol 90% of Top Patrol $3,264 e e t e e e 'I MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and city Council t FR: steve Russell, Community Development Director DA: September 3, 1993 RE: REQUEST FOR PUBLIC FACILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE FAMILY LOT The City has received a request to provide water and sewer service to a site off of Everett and Willard streets to accommodate a single-family home. (See Certification of Survey Map). Access to the residence would be provided off a 50 foot access easement that would also provide access to an existing residence (Earl and Arlene Benson). The existing residence currently has a well and on-site sewer system. With this improvement, the existing home would be connected to city sewer and water service. The applicant owns Lots 2 and 3 and the new utilities will service those lots when they develop as well at some time in the future. The applicant is requesting that access to the lot be provided off the flag lot driveway until Lots 2 and 3 are developed and at that time the driveway would be paved as a private driveway to all three residences. Recommendation Approval of request for public service with conditions. t t CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL e 1. Lots 2 and 3 shallot be built upon until the driveway is according to City requirements. 2. An easement shall b recorded over the 50 foot driveway to provide access to the existing res dence Lots 2 and 3 and Lily Lake School. 3. An easement shall Lake School. Attachment: Certificate Memo from S recorded over Parcel "A" to provide access to Lily f Survey (9-1-93) e e .' e e e "'SeJ 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE. 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL. MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION September 1, 1993 RE: Stillwater, Minnesota City Engineer SEH File No. A-STILL9401.00 Mr. Steve Russell Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 N. Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Mr. Russell: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the proposed development of Parcel B which is the Brad and Cheryl Benson property, 1901 West Willard Street. It is our understanding that the Bensons wish to build a home and garage on Parcel B and that they also own Lot 2 and Lot 3 of the Peterson Addition, which is just north of Parcel B and west of Oakes Street. We also understand that the Bensons wish to provide water and sewer service for Parcel B and future water and sewer service for Lots 2 and 3 and provide future access for Lots 2 and 3 if they should develop from an extension of Willard Street to, the east. We have reviewed the proposed sewer service from Pine Street. According to the elevations from the preliminary survey, the sewer can be constructed. from the Pine Street southerly right- of-way south to serve Parcel B and one service constructed for each Lot 2 and 3 as they now are subdivided. Since Lots 2 and 3 are to be serviced from this same line, we would recommend an 8" sewer be extended. Presently, there is an 8" stub south from the manhole at Oakes Street and Pine Street. The Contractor for the Bensons can connect to this sewer stub. In addition to constructing the sewer, there is a steep slope adjacent to Pine Street within the Oakes Street right-of-way. The Bensons should submit their plans for restoration and erosion control of this grassy slope to the City for approval prior to beginning construction: It would also be difficult to provide access to Lots 2 and 3 from Oakes Street because of the steep grade adjacent to Pine Street. 'There is also a 6" water line stubbed to the southerly right-of-way of Pine Street at Oakes Street. However, this is on the middle pressure system and would not be adequate for a new home on Parcel B. Therefore, it is necessary for the Bensons to construct water service from the intersection of Willard Street and West Street, tie into the existing high pressure system at that point, and extend a 6" water main easterly to dead end with the hydrant. This will require at least a 20' easement for the water board access to be able to maintain and flush the main in the future. If Lots 2 and 3 are to be served from the water main, a 6" water main will be required. If Lots 2 and 3 remain in their present configuration, and are developed as two separate lots, an easement would be required to provide water service to Lot 2. However, if Lots 2 and 3 are subdivided in a north/south direction such that each could receive water service from the Willard extension, then an easement would have to be provided for sewer from Oakes Street. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Sf CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI MINNEAPOLIS, MN ., Mr. Steve Russell September 1, 1993 Page 2 e The proposed home could be onstructed as a single family residence with a driveway approach from the intersection of West treet and Willard Street. However, if access is to be provided to Lots 2 and 3, there would be tree or four homes accessing onto this driveway. In keeping with the City standards, the drive ay should then be reconstructed as a street with curb and gutter and a cul-de-sac. Also, drai ge would have to be a consideration since the topography as indicated on the preliminary ontours generally drains to the east. Both the 8" sanitary sewer an the 6" water main are an extension of the City's utility system. As such, they do require a p rmit from the Pollution Control Agency and a permit from the Minnesota Department of H alth. Both permits will require plans signed by a registered engineer. The fee to the Mi esota Pollution Control Agency for permit review is $240.00 and the fee to the Minnesota Dep rtment of Health for permit review is $150.00. In addition, the Water Board would consider he 6" water main a private main and would require the property owners to maintain said wate main. We have enclosed a copy 0 the Certificate of Survey with preliminary sewer and water alignments imposed on the C rtificate of Survey. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, ~~ Richard. E. Moore, P.E. City Engineer e Enclosures c: David Junker, Public orks Director Dennis McKean, Wate Department David Magnuson, Cit Attorney e CERTIFICATE ~ ~ OF OF SEe's 32829, T30N, R20W, SURVEY S\;!;"oJ MD€ E\ClUSl';(L Y FO~~ E Jr I Jol1 Ar I ene Ben-;on 191, .est Wlllara Streel SIIII-ater. IIlnnesota 5,082 lei: (&121 ~J9'1182 Mi.\:NE SOT A WA~HINGTON COUNTY, l:n;;~"l~-E -': I ,:J,/;'!lo ~.~ :::.'" r~}}' .:.;:.. o_,~""': 1 c~'r,.. Or _<r~",,..'l""""","'~-~ I :;;;-:.:;.: ~; p.:.;;'~- -----;-\ ...-:;. &t.~.s -'" >: :. I" , \~ ~ \ I \ I ,t- ~~"J;I .- _ .,~ J:'f~I~~;:',.;~.1._ _.~"~ ~';: - .:~::;:: J " , .; n. ..'~ . \,.:' - . ; . ..-......JJI-..J r.~~:.::I... .., . },;':..i~..:~..:..'~.....-~ , .........'.'...s ~ . , I I L-.......-_ .I,.......4.....Ir.:~,.,' jA,/L57 - -l--- . I I i J.- r- I I I I - ,',. <" '.-' _ ~--- I 1- L:,... ...: }..,. ~ ~ I--. 0) ; ~ :J ~ J \ ~I ~ \ .- . I ~ .'-1 ~ l--.~ '" ~ -'";:> &'';:,("$Q-.I ,,'...,. .5 ..s~r."_' QI-E ! t~'" i .PJ'J";o:' I 'rJ .Gw-. ..'.'" 4" r!~"'_11V"~ I' JIIC.'~'$ r........ .,I~~. L~r of J(- .'_r tr,lZ:; ",,';""'-,?.lI- _ .....4 .;il.l.l"--:I ~,,~,.,~- ) ""y'J"'"J'4E ) .~_,...,. 77 I~' " dl.~ P..;'lI"r - f~-;-;;;. -;:;. ;"... ~IT'- C'~~ ~ ,',oV "40J/CZ....; :-. ~.r p~::. ...... ~ .:; ~&'1I,'1'..! ,......- ,,,- ..-:'.- ~,. ... ;1.;;....,:: A , ~ .Ct I_~ ,t.. ~,.ow:' ,,~..,. I.r...,~. . r:~"-r ;.n~L "'~/J1 /?r~.:n..~;4"O #e~~'.>4 I:) .!..:t~.! .# .4.t.~L"-VE 6...-,..,H4.V /..:'~L'J. '\ PARCEL /{, ~.:. .,~.~~.:: ;;..:., ~ r::1. '~". >. L:~t '>-(--'.-.~.:. . '....r..-.:... .... :.1.' .- . , Bra\1 . and Ch~r 1 Benso:l 1~1 lIest l/iHara Street St Illwilter" Minnesota 550S2 tel' 1&121 ~B-118] I I _____1 I L ~.I- ..".... 11. I "73 C./:,- . ~"_"'_'''d " ju/ti( .f c./- " 'r;:_ f;:~; :-:...~ ';::5 .---- . , .' TiU~ fcl!G~ f..... ~-..'~'''''': =,/-'.;...... . ...........f. . '2k: . I/' I!..fnl\iil~_ -I ~- -~I - ,J<.c- .L- = L ~ i .,~:~.~- - ~ Orientation of this bearlnqS'/ste'Tl ...r 'I.'" ~.t"'..- -. I 'Inaltates survey .onu~ ent founa . /Cf - -+ 0 lnaltates In' 1.0. Iron DIDe ~e J., ,'[,/ --;:-: -;-- InscrlOea RLS 1J71~. .. /./:r:.,i':~~."'''.'l;iContours Shown are tasetJ on assut:'le l/t'l ,'/', oole 20'! _ester Iy of southeast co ) ~"l Unless notea other.lse. overheJ0 0 , 'I::: on or Mja"nt tne slle -ere not I ; t t:\ I \.-.. pona Location sno_n Is scalea from :; I ",' ~l Existing Earl Benson Dralntlela 10 _ _ __, 1 Gt} ~~ 'Rec.' or OR.' Inaleate, Reeora va .' J.- ." I ,\ See Sheets 1 ana 2 for orot'Osea Pa -:. ;j....\ r;::: I _ Arlene Benson Oeser loll on as recor ...... ') Y nU<llerous aescrlptlon gaos ana o',er / ~~ab~n~e~~~gm~~n!~~gE~~~~e eg~eGr.n ~ ~." '$, I I ~ the Parcel A aeserlotlons on $I1e~t :: ~ . ~:. , t t ~ '- .r-.... ~I ' ~ I J ;'\ .~ .~....." J .-'1 . I..I"_",.-~' _...,.:....._~~:~ .. .w,[[~ ,.,~, -~ 0'- ':, ... : 7 ......,_,......._._. _.:.:2 .~.. ~.~. 'r-~ I '. -,',4.- . .:. '~~"I'I . . ~ ': ;; _;, L.~/, ~ _ ~;_~ll,_~ iF:: l_. ~ S/L. J/LR -,-~..~~~~. -.:.. ;-- n""""'.ZtJl.&&"- - ,.- .::' --J . .....:---- - ". r-~;' :,~" .oj;t:",-' _"~".IJ'_~',:~___ t \ .'1'" . .... ~ I . /' .....- -~ f' " r--- ,;\\' C -;7"- I' ~ -J 71 'JJ/ __ - - ___ - - -"D I ..u.;-,~:::'~ro ~~~. /'/ e:;;J/-. J~ .-, ,',.,. C' I n i::'~-.~ ./../. - --,aJY .') ..... -- - -l_ J "'- ~"~ . . ' , I / - . - ,( \1'\1, /~~I/ '7J'~ - r-~L' 1/ II / ~~:. ~:':.':L:;:~ _'~:'f...';:::.;,:~~~ '.'-1 / 'f'-'f" I I , 1 I ~/~ 1:-1/ r. ~'''"!_ / ~ I ' .,1 ',:. , I L c ~!' ~;:~~~"..., I~/'-.~I'~' /./ fit /' '. 11.,:..t.."._~ '.... r.._ J./7.tvll./ ;;.Ii \L '~\ :;'(;N" ,,, ~(;;}::: 1'/( d ~ '(rIle .\"I.\~' P:n.'_"'. 1,'7,/1"":' / \ .... ; I' I J ! ~\ '\~'\ ~,II'~ /. ~, ;\\\ \\~"j~~(-;{./- / :.r; \ '\ .: I " \ ' . ~ \ '0.:',;,' 3,2, nl\1 ..= 57: -H- )-.------ ! L.):, If,'r I 7 ~I ~". - ~,.:. :..;: -~.~., F~~ p - "..,..,.,., I ,"'-....."r'.'F j,r.-.,: J _ 'TO .~.. ~",." .-" fr r,!. .r "Ir~.. t' ,"'''.(4''.'- - ~p-Ir!~'::::, .\ ,. -, " ~_"~!'. .6"~:"J:.:' .:.':;:;~.L:i~~t~-!f~.4f.~ LOT .2 t-:. .... '"' '\ \1'-' ~~ . , "''; /~. ',-:f ....1 ~ ~ \ .\ '\ ~ '\ \'. ./ : ; , .\ , .-;- -... ....."--. ~"......._- ;l~ /0") , ~ ./ - If,'\. .$8'f'"'"t;!'&'"e ..YJ. --I .. j .1<,' '" ," ..... .... .......I..L.. " ;. ;.... :.1 ..-i .~ ..., . ~~ ..' , C I " ....... /f."':.;;~~ .... ,$" .,)"_c' G. ....~~:.. ...":.... . " e e e , MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FR: City Coordinator DA: August 30, 1993 RE: CURBSIDE RECYCLING GRANTS Accompanying this memo is the 1993 Memorandum of Agreement between Washington County and the City of Stillwater for the distribution of curbside recycling grant funds in 1994 and the agreement between the City of oak Park Heights and Stillwater as required per item 3 a. of the county agreement. The City of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights are eligible to receive an additional $.50 per household per year for conducting a joint curbside recycling program (basically the cities just have to agree to conduct similar programs). The City of Stillwater will receive $55,219.50 for curbside recycling from the county in 1994. However, our expenses for recycling will be about $99,000. In addition to the recycling grant funds, the city should receive about $4,500 for the sale of the special "excess" waste garbage bags. This will leave a balance of about $39,500 to be funded through general fund revenues (if the city were to recover the balance from user fees the cost to the homeowner would be about .65 to .70 cents per month per household. I would recommend approval of both agreements. ~~Jt MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR RECEIPT AND DISTR UTION OF JOINT CURBSIDE RECYCLING GRANT FUNDS THIS AGREEMENT, made and by and between the City 0 ntered into as of this ____ day of , 1993, Oak Park Heights and the City of Stillwater. WHEREAS, the Washington ounty Board of Commissioners has budgeted money for 1994 to be provided to ci ies to further develop recycling services within the county; and WHEREAS, Cities in Wash in ton County are eligible to receive additional funds for conducting joint curb ide recycling collection program; and WHEREAS, the City of still ater and the City of Oak Park Heights wish to conduct a joint curbside recycl" g collection program with the City of stillwater coordinating the program n order to qualify for the additional funds; NOW, TH~REFORE, the parti s hereto agree as follows: 1. The City of tillwater is authorized to receive any funds disbur ed by Washington County for the joint curbside recy ling program. 2. The City of S Heights an allocation f fifteen (15) illwater shall pay to the City of Oak Park ount equal to the recycling grant r the City of Oak Park Heights within ays of receipt of such.funds. In Witness Thereof, the arties have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. City of Oak P rk Heights By Date City of Stillwater By Date r e e e e 1993 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR CURBSIDE RECYCLING GRANT DISTRIBUTION THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of this _ day of , 1993, by and between the County of Washington, hereinafter referred to as th~ "County", and the City of Stillwater, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee". ' WHEREAS, the County desires to encourage and support residential recycling to reduce the County's reliance on solid waste disposal facilities, and WHEREAS, the Washington County Board of Commissioners has budgeted money for 1993 to be used to further develop recycling service in the County, and WHEREAS, the Grantee and the City of Oak Park Heights wish to conduct a joint curbside recycling collection program with the Grantee coordinating the program. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Term: e The term of the Agreement shall be from the date this Agreement is approved by the County Board to December 31, 1993. I ~_.. 2. The County's obli2ation: a. - The County will pay the Grantee an amount equal to ten,'dollars and fIfty cents per household which shall equal $55,219.50 as determined using the Metropolitan Council's 1992 Population Estimates. . b. The County will pay the Grantee an amount equal to $14,490.00 which is the recycling grant allocation for the City of Oak Park Heights based on the Metropolitan Council's 1992 Population Estimates. All grant funds received will be used to provide recycling services and public education as identifIed in Section 3.c. of this Agreement. c. Indemnify and hold the Grantee harmless from any claims, suits, or damages arising out of any act or omission of the County, its offIcers, employees, or agents in the performance of the services provided for by this Agreement. e -1- 3. a. The Grantee shall enter into an agreement with the City of Oalc Park Heights that the G antee is authorized to receive recycling grant funds for the City of Oak P k Heights. e b. The Grantee will si n a contract with a recycling contractor which specifies the responsibilitie of each party and the rate of payment for curbside recycling services s provided by the contractor. c. The Grantee will u e all recycling grant money received in 1993 as a result of this Agreement for recycling services and public education related to recycling. If all r cycling funds are not used within the grant period, the Grantee must sub 't a plan to the County by December 15, 1993, which indicates how the unds will be used the following year. d. The Grantee will i demnify and hold the County and its officers, employees, and agents hannle s from any claims, suits or damages arising out of any act or omission of the Grantee, its officers, agents, or volunteer workers in the performance 0 the services provided for by this Agreement. e. The Grantee furth r agrees that it will at all times during the term of this Agreement, have nd keep in force a general liability insurance policy insuring the Grant e at a level not less than the liability limits set forth in Minn. Stat. Secti n 466.04. A Certificate 'of Insurance evidencing this coverage must be rovided to the County before this Agreement is effective. e f. The Grantee will require in its contract with the Contractor that the Contractor will in emnify and hold the County and its officers, employees, and agents hannle s from any claims, suits or damag~s arising out of any act or omission 0 the Contractor, its officers, agents or volunteer workers in the performanc! of the services provided for by this Agreement. r g. The Grantee furth r agrees that in the contract it will require the Contractor to at all times d ng the course of the Contract to have and keep in force a general liability olicy insuring itself at a level not less than the liability limits set forth in 'nn. Stat. Section 466.04 and to provide the Grantee and the County with hotocopies of said policy. -2- e h. The Grantee will prepare and submit semiannual recycling reports to the County. The report covering the period from January 1 to June 30 shall be due by July 15, and the report covering the period from July 1 to December 31 shall be due by January 31 of the followingyear~' The semiannual reports will be made on a form provided by the County. e 1. The Grantee should organize a recycling committee which will assist in monitoring the curbside recycling program and provide direction on additional public education activities and other program needs. J. The Grantee further agrees to take affIrmative action to include the participation of targeted group businesses (small Minnesota businesses owned and controlled by women, people of color or people with disabilities) in the performance of this Agreement, whenever possible. At such times, the Grantee agrees to contact the County to obtain a list of targeted group businesses. 4. The Grantee and County further agree that: a. The Grantee will follow its Curbside Recycling Work Plan as submitted to the County. e b. It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. c. All books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the County, and the State Auditor, as appropriate, in acco.rdance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. Section 16B.06 subd. 4. d. The parties will comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and executive orders pertaining to unlawful discrimination on account of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. e. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties. rgdcs3/93 e -3- IN WITNESS WHEREOF the County and Grantee have executed this Agreement as of the date fIrst written above GRANTEE BY DATE FEDERAL ill # e WASHINGTON COUNTY BY Chair, Washington County Board of Commissioners DATE BY Charles Swanson County Administrator DATE Recommended for action: BY e Mary McGlothlin, Director Department of Health, Environment & Land Management DATE APPROVED AS TO FORM BY Ass't. Washington Co. Attorney DATE -4- e e e e "'SaJ 3535 VADNAfSCENTERDRIVE, 200SEHCENTER, ST PAUL. MN55110 612490,2000 800325,2055 ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTA nON August 25,1993 Mr. Nile Kriesel City Coordinator City of Stillwater 216 N. Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Nile: RE: Stillwater, Minnesota Curve Crest Boulevard/ Greeley Street Traffic Signal SEH File No. 93132 Attached is a tabulation of the bids received on Tuesday, August 17, 1993 for the installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Curve Crest Boulevard/Greeley Street. We recommend that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Peoples Electric, for the sum of $94,900. You will note that the low bid is $12,000 higher than the Engineer's Estimate of $82,900. We have seen bid prices for one signalized intersection vary significantly this past year. In talking with several of the contractors, and as evidenced by obtaining only three bids, there is presently a significant amount of this type of work committed and under construction. In order for the City to award this contract, the agreement between the City and Washington County needs to be executed and written concurrence for the low bid needs to be received from the County. . , Therefore, we recommend that the City of Stillwater award the contract to Peoples Electric for the lump sum price of $94,900, subject to the execution of the City/County agreement and the written concurrence of the award from Washington County. Sincerely, TAS/kam Attachment c: Jim Hanson, Washington County Elmer Morris, Mn/DOT State Aid Dick Moore, SEH SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC, MINNEAPOLIS, MN ~Q.~ Thomas A. Sohrweide, P.E. Traffic Engineer ~~~ '\~ ~ ,~~:. '(~~:;I ST CLOUD, MN MADISON, WI CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI ~ NO. TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM STILLWATER, MINNESOTA SOUTH GREELEY STREET AT CURVE CREST BLVD. SAP. 169-112-08 COUNTY PROJECT NO. RP 93-6603 CITY PROJECT NO. L.I. 292 SEH FILE NO. A-STILL3132 BID TABULATION ITEM ITEM UNIT ACCURATE ELECTRIC QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS PEOPLES ELECTRIC UNIT PRICE UNIT PRICE TOTAL TOTAL -----...----........------------------......---------------.....----------------------------------------------------------------------------------..------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $99,200.00 $94,990.00 $94,990.00 2565.511 FULL-TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL SYSTEM TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM e $103,175.00 $103,175.00 $99,200.00 It It WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PARKS · HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES 11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH. STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082,9573 612,430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612.430-4350 August 31, 1993 Mr. Nile Kriesel, Coordinator City of Stillwaer 21 6 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: County Road 66 (Greeley Avenue) and Curve Crest Dear Nile: Donald C. Wisniewski, P,E. Director Public Works/County Engineer John p, Perkovich, Deputy Director Operations Division Donald J, Theisen, P. E" Deputy Director Technical & Administrative Division Richard D, Herold, P.E. Design/Construction Engineer James D, Hanson, ,P,E. Transportation Engineer Edward Kapler, Facilities Operations Manager We have prepared a maintenance agreement for the traffic signal system at Greeley Avenue and Curve Crest. This document is enclosed for your review and comment. The agreement follows the procedure as set in the signal justification report. e Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments. If this agreement is acceptable to you, we will request County Board approval. . Sincerely, 9::H~O~ Transportation Engineer cc: Dick Moore, City Engineer Tom Sohrweide, SEH JDH:cr e Printed on Recycled Paper EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ~~~ ,~ ~. ,~ ,. \ W AS\-\ING,ON COUN''l pUS\'\C WOR\{S OEPAR,\IJ\EN' ,RAfflC CON' OL SIGNAL \lJ\AIN,ENANCE AGREE\IJ\EN' BE,VJEEN COUN''l Of W AS\-\ING,ON ANO \-\10 C\\'l Of s,ILLWA,ER fOR \lJ\AIN,ENANCE Of A ,RAffIC CON,ROL SIGNAL A' ,\-\10 IN,ERSEC\I N Of GREELE'l S,REE' \CR 66) ANO UR"E CRES' SOULE" ARO . . \N S,\LL VJ A ,ER e - e e e J '" MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT CR 66 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the County of Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City"; WHEREAS, it has been determined to install a traffic control signal at the intersection of Greeley Street (CR 66) and Curve Crest Boulevard, and; WHEREAS, the County and City will share in the maintenance costs of the traffic control signal as hereinafter setforth; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOllOWS: 1 . The City shall install or cause the installation of a actuated traffic control signal with overhead and pedestrian indications at Greeley Street (CR 66) and Curve Crest Boulevard. The installation costs are covered under separate agreements. 2. The City shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the City. 3. The County shall maintain and keep in repair the traffic signal, including relamping, cleaning, and painting; and the City shall reimburse the County for all costs involved with relamping, cleaning, and painting the signal. 4. The City shall indemnify, save, and hold harmless the County and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action of whats.oever nature or character arising out of, or by reason of, the performance of any work by the City provided for hereby, and further agrees to defend, without cost or expense to the County, its agents or employees, any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of the work to be performed by the City. 5. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be; performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. The County shall not be responsible under the Workmen's Compensation Act for any employees of the City. 6. The County shall indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or 'causes of action of whatsoever nature or character arising out of, or by reason of, the performance Page 1 of 2 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SI~NAL AT CR 66 ... of any work by the County provided for hereby, and further agrees to defend, without cost or expense to the City, its a fents or employees, any action or proceeding commenced for e the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of the work to be erformed by the County. 7. All timing of al traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the County, and no chan es shall be made therein except with the approval of the County. I IN WITNESS WHEREJF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals. I I CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA In the presence of: By Its By Its Date Approved as to Form: THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, MINNESOTA By Chairman, Board of County Commissioners e Washington County Attorne Recommended for Approval: Attest County Administrator Date f:lpwlreynoldslagreeltrafcr66,agr e Page 2 of 2 .....--..... ......, ce SA ER FIREWORKS DISPLA Y CO. 9840 - 271 5t Avenue ZIMMERMAN, MINNESOTA 55398 (612) 856-2838 September 2, 1993 City of Stillwater 216 N 4th Stillwater, MN 55082 Attention Nile: Thank you for the payment for the display. We discussed the e sales tax and you agreed to pay for it. The amount due for the sales tax is $ 780.00. Prompt payment will be appreciated. Sincerely, P.vtL fvw~ Pete Cermak, President Banner Fireworks Display Co. bc e I " @' \ \ ;\ " \ \ " .. \ \ . \ , I - . , .. . . . ' . \ " : . ~ t ': : ! . . ,- ~ : '1 H~ ~i : :1 ; ;i: !-i .', 'q ~ ' p J" ~ ::{ t', ", 1 ~ I -,:: . . ,., ~~ ~i ;~ I: ,1 l~ ;:1 :., \f !;j !.\: .:. I ~., ;; i ~: h i; I "-' j I: , I :!; . . ".-; r' -.: i;.; " ::: ;:1 ., .f~,r,~j~ ( .... ::i tl :.~~ -I. ,:./j e e e MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FR: City Coordinator DA: September 3, 1993 RE: OAK GLEN GOLF COURSE The Oak Glen Ad Hoc Committee has met twice in the past two weeks to review various options related to the Oak Glen situation. The Committee has determined that three options could be pursued. The options are: 1. City purchase golf course and operate as municipal golf course; 2. City purchase golf course and enter into Management Agreement with Oak Glen Golf Co. (i.e., David Johnson) to manage; and 3. City purchase and lease back golf course to David Johnson. In order to pursue these options any further, it will be necessary to determine whether or not the City has the authority to issue bonds and/or enter into an agreement that would be required to carry out the options. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Council authorize the expenditure of funds to obtain legal opinions (from Bond Counsel - Tom Hay) before further study is conducted. Mayor Hooley, Councilmember Bodlovick and myself can provide you with further explanation at Tuesday's meeting. /},j ,':7 /?,v(/CZ/ e e e \ . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FR: City Coordinator DA: September 2, 1993 RE: RESIGNATION OF ROBERT MURPHY, CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR Accompanying this memo is a letter of resignation from Robert Murphy who has served the City as the Civil Defense Director since January 1, 1991. In view of Mr. Murphy's resignation, I would recormnend that the Council consider appointing the Police Chief as Civil Defense, Director and rewriting the Civil Defense Ordinance. Many changes have taken place over the past 40 - 50 years pertaining to civil defense/emergency management needs and procedures and I believe it would now be more appropriate to have someone who is directly involved in the day-to-day operation of the City be responsible for the duties and activities associated with the position - such as the Police Chief. I think this is the most cormnon situation in the metro area. I have enclosed a copy of the Civil Defense Ordinance for your review. Perhaps a workshop would be in order to discuss this matter. Obviously, it would also be in order to adopt a resolution cormnending Bob Murphy for his excellent service to the City as Civil Defense Director. Bob helped bring our Emergency Management Procedures up to date and has kept a constant vigil on our siren warning system. I personally have enjoyed his presence. a~ e e e , ,~ Iii f-I- r.r t) Y C e 4 J..l 6 'j t .... , :5 e..f' +-. 1./ /193 ehAVli~ l-/fJ6/~'I Sltllw n{~ v (~iJ I ff,AlD -f., /(6he.v+ 0, jVl",vf'k~ her~""1 5<1&",',1 /0'1 r e. 5 i r IV If l:,''' AI 1'1 :3 '5 I; /I ..., ,d:. "- v e j v j \ t.l e-F""- '^' S "- \ l::n y ... ,d: "y A 5 0 r: S e ff. 3 I) j'l if '" · ;;: w;4 N t 1:.. b i-I.. 04 N K t j. "- Iv! 1\ 'f ,p" -.I- Gc '"' p<::-'\ \'10 v- I-I. e- h, """ y prlo de Dr e. . F $'" v ": "T ta.~ e. ,h-z.e. N.$ <> F t \. "'- c'.'I- '( 0 F :;> fill "" .t -{ .." V / tJ -r h...... P AS \.. :r y... (.l \I '1 "- '" '~ . 'i €. D ~ +.. .-(1. A'" k. '" f} i /l-'j ,(", :5 I' pe-"- y.J ,~-..... .~ -'. . . , . r 22.04 22.04. MUNICIPAL CIVIL DEFENSE ORDINANCE. e Subdivision 1. POLICY AND PURPOSE. (1) Because of the existing and increasing possibility of the occurrence of disasters of unprecedented size and destructiveness resulting from enemy attack, sabotage, or other hostile action, or from fire, flood, earth- quake, or other natural causes, and in order to insure that preparations of this city will be adequate to deal with such disasters, and generally, to provide for the common defense and to protect the public peace, health, and safety, and to preserve the lives and property of the people of this city, it is hereby found and del cared to be necessary: (a) To establish a local organization for civil defense; (b) To provide for the exercise of necessary powers during civil defense emergenc1es; (c) To provide for the rendering of mutual aid between this city and other political subdivisions of this state and of other states with respect to the carrying out of civil defense functions. ., (2) It is further declared to be the purpose of this ordinance and the policy of the city that all civil defense functions of this city be coordinated to the maximum extent practicable with the comparable functions of the Federal government, of this state, the county, and of ~ther states and localities, and of private agencies pf every type, to the end that the most effective preparations and use may be made of the nation's manpower, resources, and facilities, for dealing with any disaster that may occur. e Subd. 2. DEFINITIONS. (1) "Civil Defense" means the preparation~ for and the carrying out of all emergency functions, other than functions for which military forces are primarily responsible, to prevent, minimize and repair injury and damage resulting from disasters caused by enemy attack, sabotage, or natural causes. These functions include, without limitation, fire-fighting services, police services, medical health services, rescue, engineering~ warning services, conununications, radiological, chemical and other special weapons defense, evacuation of persons from stricken areas, emergency welfare services, emergency transportation, existing or properly assigned functions of plant protection, temporary restoration of public utility services, utilization of best available Fallout Shelters, and other functions related to civilian ~ protection, together with all other activities necessary or incidental to preparation for and carrying out of the foregoing functions. (2) "Civil defense emergency" means an emergency declared by the governor under Minnesota Statutes, Section 12.31, or an emergency proclaimed by the mayor under Subd. 6 of this ordinance. e (3) "Civil defense forces" means any personnel employed by the city and any other volunteer or paid member of the local civil defense agency engaged 1n carrying on civil defense functions in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance or any rule or order thereunder. 2-12-80 22.04 Subd. 3 Subd. 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF CIVIL DEFENSE AGENCY. e (1) There is hereby c eated within the city government a civil defense agency, which shall be under the supervision and control of a director of civil defense, hereina ter called the director. The director shall be appointed by the mayor for an indefinite term and may be removed by him at any time. The directo may be compensated at a rate to be determined by the city council and h shall be paid his necessary expenses. The director shall have direct resp nsibility for the organization, administration, and operation of the civil defense agency, subject to the direction and control of the mayor. The civil defense agency shall be organized into such divisions and bureaus, consistent with state and local civil defense plans, as the director deems ecessary to provide for the efficient performance of local civil defense fu ctions during a civil defense emergency. The civil defense agency shall p rform civil defense functions within the city and, in addition, shall con uct such functions outside the city as may be required pursuant to the provisions of the Minnesota Civil Defense Act of 1951 as amended, or this ordinance. (2) There is hereby c eated within the civil defense agency a civil defense advisory committee, hereinafter called the "committee". Members of the committee shall be appointed by the mayor to represent city departments and other groups concerned with civil defense. The mayor shall be chairman and the director shall be secretary of the committee. The committee shall advise the director and the city council on all matters pertaining to civil defense. ~ Each member shall ser e without compensation and shall hold office at the ,., pleasure of the mayor. Subd. 4. (1) The director, wi any regional or state proposed mutual aid a outside the state for defense emergency too such agreements to th consistent with the s emergency, it shall b forces to render assi aid arrangements. An r'r of another state shal (2) The director sha resources, and facili necessary to determin most efficient use in (3) The director sha Defense of the City w the established Fallo Commission for review has approved the plan agencies and all civi functions assigned by manner from time to t activities of the city grated with the civil OF THE DIRECTOR. h the consent of the mayor, shall represent the city on organization for civil defense. He shall develop reements with other political subdivisions within or reciprocal civil defense aid and as~istance in a civil great to be dealt with unassisted,~-;and he shall present council for its action. Such arrangements shall be ate civil defense plan and during a civil defense the duty of the civil defense agency and civil defense tance in accordance with the provisions of such mutual mutual aid arrangement with a political subdivision be subject to the approval of the governor. 1 make such studies and surveys of the manpower, industries, ies of, the city including Fallout Shelters as he deems their adequacy for civil defense, and to plan for their time of a civil defense emergency. 1 prepare a comprehensive general plan for the Civil ich will include a community shelter plan utilizing t Shelters and shall present such plan to the Planning and to the City Council for adoption. When the council by resolution, it shall be the duty of all municipal defense forces of the city to perform the duties and the plan as approved. The plan may be modified in like me. The director shall coordinate the civil defeuse o the end that they shall be consistent and fully inte- dpfpn~p n1 !>"C! ,..~ "'+-"'__ __1:..:__1 ___1..~~_~~_~ e e e e 22.04 Subd. 4 (4) In accordance with the state and city civil defense plan, the director shall institute such training programs and public information programs and shall take all other preparatory steps, including the partial or full mobilization of civil defense forces in advance of actual disaster, as may be necessary to the prompt and effective operation of the city civil defense plan in time of a civil defense emergency. He may. from time to time, conduct such practice air-raid alerts or other civil defense exercises as he may deem necessary. (5) The director shall be responsible to and under the direction of the Mayor and the City Coordinator in the carrying out of his duties. The director shall utilize the personnel, services, equipment, supplies, and facilities of existing departments and agencies of the city to the maximum extent practicable. The officers and personnel of all such departments and agencies shall, to the maximum extent practicable, cooperate with and extend such services and facilities to the local civil defense agency and to the governor upon request. The head of each department and agency in cooperation with and under the direction of the director, shall be responsible for the planning and the programming of such civil defense activities as will involve the utilization of the facilities of this department or agency. (6) The director shall, in cooperation with existing ~ity departments and agencies affected, organize, recruit, and train Fallout Shelter Managers, Radiological Monitors, police reserves, rescue personnel, auxiliary firemen, emergency medical personnel, and any other personnel that may be required on a volunteer basis to carry out the civil defense plans of the city and the state. To the extent that such emergency personnel are recruited to augment a regular city department or agency for civil defense emergencies, they shall be assigned to such department or agency f~r purposes of administration and command. The director may dismiss any civil defense volunteer at any time and require him to surrender any equipment and identification furnished by the city. (7) Consistent with the civil defense plan, the direc~pr shall provide and equip emergency hospitals, casualty stations, ambulances, canteens, evacuation centers, and other facilities, or conveyances for the care of the injured or homeless persons. (8) The director shall carry out all orders, rules, and regulations issued by the governor pertaining to civil defense. ~ (9) The Civil Defense Director shall direct and control the general operations of all local civil defense forces during a civil defense emergency in conformity with controlling regulations and instructions of State Civil Defense authorities. The heads of departments and agencies shall be governed by his orders in respect thereto. 2-12-80 22.04 Subd. 4 I (10) Consistent with he civil defense plan, the director shall provide and equip at some suit ble place in the city an Emergency Operating Center and, if required by th local civil defense plan, auxiliary centers to be used during a civil de ense emergency as headquarters for direction and control of civil defense forces. He shall arran~for representation at the center by municipal departments and agencies, public utilities and other agencies authori ed by Federal or State authority to carryon civil defense activities during a civil defense emergency. He shall arrange for the installation at th Emergency Operating Center of necessary facilities for communication with and between heads of civil defense divisions, the stations and operating units of municipal services and other agencies concerned with civil defense and for communication with other communities and .Emergency Operati g Centers, within the surrounding area and with the Federal and State age cies concerned. e (11) During the first 30 days of a civil defense emergency, if the Legislature is in session or the governor has coupled his declaration of the emergency with a call for a special session of the Legislature, the director may, when ne essary to save life or property, require any person, except members of the Federal or State military forces and officers of the state or any other po itical subdivision, to perform services for civil defense purposes as h directs and he may commandeer, for the time being, any motor vehicle, to Is, appliances, or any other property, subject to the owner's right to just ,compensation as provided by law. (12) Police Reserve.~ There is hereby created within the Police Department a Police Reserve to b composed to such number of volunteer police as the ~ublic Safety Directo shall deem necessary. ~olice Reservists shall be appointed and may be emoved by the City Cou~~il. The Reserve shall be under the operational control and supervision of the same authority as regular policemen to he limits granted them by State Law. The Civil Defense Director shal be responsible for providing training materials for the Reserve which will prepare them for emergency duties. The Public Safety Director shall be responsible for providing trai~ing' materials for the Reserve which relate to Police duties. e Subd. 5 GENERAL PROVISI NS ON CIVIL DEFENSE WORKERS. (1) No person shall civil defense agency " or violence in the co or in this state, or by force or violence, for information charg Each person who is ap before entering upon authorized to adminis state department of c The oath shall be sub Statutes, Section 12. e employed or associated in any capacity in the ho advocates or has advocated a change by force stitutional form of government of the United States he overthrow of any government in the United States or who has been convicted of or is under indictment ng any subversive act against the United States. ointed to serve in the civil defense agency shall, is duties, take an oath in writing before a person er oaths in this state, or before any officer of the viI defense, or the local (or county) director. tantially in the form prescribed by Minnesota 3. e 2-12-80 e e e 22.04 Subd. 5 (2) Civil defense volunteers shall be called into service only in case of a civil defense emergency or a natural disaster for which the regular municipal forces are inadequate or for necessary training and preparation for such emergencies. All volunteers shall serve without compensation. (3) Each civil defense volunteer shall be provided with such suitable insignia or other identification as may be required by the director. Such identification shall be in a form and style approved by the Federal government. No volunteer shall exercise any authority over the persons or property of others without his identification. No person except an authorized volunteer shall use the identification of a volunteer or otherwise represent himself to be an authorized volunteer. (4) No civil defense volunteer shall carry any firearm while on duty except on written order of the chief of the police department. (5) Personnel procedures of the city applicable to regular employees shall not apply to volunteer civil defense workers, but shall apply to paid employees of the civil defense ~gency. Subd. 6. EMERGENCY REGULATIONS. (l) When used in this section, the term lIcivil defens'e emergencyll includes, in addition to the meaning given in Subd. 2 (2), disasters caused by fire, flood, windstorm, or other natural causes. (2) Whenever necessary to meet a Civil Defense emergency or to prepare for such an emergency for which adequate regulations have not been adopted by the governor or the city council, the mayor may by. proclamation promulgate regulations, consistent with applicable Federal or State law or regulation, respecting: protection against nuclear missiles; the sounding of attack warning; the conduct of persons and the use of property during emergencies; the repair, maintenance, and safeguarding of essential public services; emergency health, fire, and safety regulation, trial drills, or practice periods required for preliminary training; and all othe~ matters which are required to protect public safety, health, and welf?re in civil defense emergencies. " (3) Every proclamation of emergency regulations shall be in writing and signed by the mayor; shall be dated; shall refer to the particular civil defense emergency to which it pertains, if so limited; and shall be filed in the office of the city clerk, where a copy shall be kept posted and available for public inspection during business hours. Notice of the existence of such regulation and its availability for inspection at the clerk's office shall be conspicuously posted at the front of the city hall or other headquarters of the city and at such other places in the affected area as the mayor shall designate in the proclamation. Thereupon, the regulation shall take effect immediately or at such later time as may be specified in the proclamation. By like proclamation the mayor may modify or rescind any such regulation. 2-12-80 22.04 Subd. 4 e (4) The city council time. If not sooner r end of 30 days after i emergency to which it or regulation inconsis mayor shall be suspend conflict exists. ayrescind any such regulation by resolution at any scinded,every such regulation shall expire at. the s effective date or at the end of the civil defense elates, whichever occurs first. Any ordinance, rule, ent with an emergency regulation promulgated by the d during the period of time and to the extent that such During a civil defense emergency, the city is, notwithstanding any statutory or charter provision t the contrary, empowered, through its governing body acting within or witho t the corporate limits of the city, to enter into contracts and incur ob igations necessary to combat such disaster by protecting the health and safety f persons and property, and providing emergency assistance to the vict'ms of such disaster. The city may exercise such powers in the light of the exigencies of the disaster without compliance with time-consuming pr cedures and formalities prescribed by law pertaining to the performance of ublic work, entering into contracts, incurring of obligations, employmen of temporary workers, rental of equipment, purchase of supplies and materi Is, limitations upon tax levies, and the appropriation and expenditure of public funds including, but not limited to, publication of ordinances and resolutions, publication of calls for bids, provisions of civil service laws and rules, provisions relating to low bi~s, and requirements for budgets. (5) During a civil defense emergency the mayor is authorized to contract 4It on behalf of the city for services or for the purchase of merchandise or materials where the a ount of the contract or purchase does not exceed $1,000.00. The mayor ay take such action wi~hout prior approval of the council, and without ompliance with regular .purchasing and bidding procedures, but all claims result'ng therefrom shall be audited and approved by the council as in the cas of other purchases and contracts. Subd. 7. CIVIL DEFENSE 1GENCY PROCEDURE. ".' (1) There is hereby ~stablished in the city treasury 4 special fund to be known as the civil deense fund. Into this fund shall be placed the proceeds of taxes levied for c'vil defense, money transferred from other funds, gifts, and other revenues of the civil defense agency. From it shall be made expenditures for the peration and maintenance of the civil defense agency and other expenditure for civil defense. Regular accounting, disbursement, purchasing,budgeting, and other financial procedures of the city shall apply to the civil defense und insofar as practicable; but budgeting requirements and other financial p ocedures shali not apply to expenditures from the fund in any case when thei application will prevent compliance with terms and conditions of a Feder 1 or State grant of money or property for civil defense purposes. (2) The director sha year, prepare and pre council and the publi civil defense agency 1, as soon as possible after the end of each fiscal ent to the city council for the information of the , a comprehensive report of the activities of the uring the year. e 2-12-80 22.04 Subd. 8 e Subd. 8. FALLOUT SHELTER IN PUBLIC STRUCTURE. (1) It is the policy of the city that fallout shelter be incorporated in all public buildings of the city to the fullest ,extent practicable in order to provide protection against radiation in the event of nuclear attack. (2) The city council shall require that all contracts for the design or construction of public buildings, including additions to or alterations of existing structures, incorporate fallout protection for at least the normal anticipated daily population of the building. The fallout shelter protection provided for shall meet or exceed the minimum space and fallout protection criteria recommended by the Office of Civil Defense, United States Department of Defense, unless exempted from such shelter requirement as provided in Subdivision 3. (3) The council may exempt buildings or structures from the requirements of this section where it finds that such incorporation of fallout shelter will create an additional cost in the construction of such structure in excess of 5% of the estimated cost thereof without shelter so incorporated, or if it finds that other factors make unnecessary or impracticable the incorporation of fallout shelter in such structures. Subd. 9. CONFORMITY AND COOPERATION WITH FEDERAL AND STATE AUTHORITY. e (1) Every officer and agency of the city shall cooperate with Federal and State authorities and with authorized agencies engaged in civil defense and emergency measures to the fullest possible extent consistent with the performance of their other duties. The provisions of this ordinance and of all regulations made thereunder shall be subject to all applicable and controlling provisions of Federal and State"'laws and of regulations and orders issued thereunder and shall be deemed to be suspended and inoperative so far as there is any conflict therewith. (2) The city council may appoint any qualified person holding a position in any agency created under Federal or State authority foi'~ivil defense purposes as a special policeman of the city, with such police. powers and duties within the city incident to the functions of his position, not exceeding those of a regular policeman of the city, as may be prescribed in the appointment. Every such policeman shall be subject to the supervision and control of the chief of police and such other police officers of the city as the chief may designate. " Subd. 10. PARTICIPATION IN LABOR DISPUTE OR POLITICS. The civil defense agency shall not participate in any form of political activity, nor shall it be employed directly or indirectly for political purposes, nor shall it be employed in a legitimate labor dispute. Subd. 11. PENALTY. Any person who violates any provision of this ordinance or of any regulation adopted thereunder relating to acts, omissions, Or conduct other than official acts of city officers or employees, is guilty of a misdemeanor. e 2-12-80 . LIST OF BILLS EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 93-160 e Abrahamson Nurseries Ace Hardware American Excelsior A T & T Bailey, Charles Bartkey, Robert Bealka, Gene Brown, Dean H. Bruggeman Companies Buberl Landscaping Commissioner of Transportation Consolidated Plastics Coordinated Business Systems Croixland Excavating Crysteel Distributing, Inc. Cub Foods DAC Industries Davies Water Equipment Deblon, Diane Del's Stillwater Outdoor Equip. Desch, Mark L. & Gloria Earl F. Andersen, Inc. Ecolab Pest Elimination Emergency Apparatus Engineering Contacts Fire Chief's Conference Flaherty Equipment Corp. Fullerton, Gary Glaser, Paul Hamble, Rod Harvest States Heritage Printing Home Decorating Johnson Controls Johnson, Jeffrey Johnson, Ron Kimball Midwest Kirchner & Associates K Mart Kriesel, Nile Kruse, Delbert Kunde, Russell Labor Relations Lakeland Ford Trucks Lake Welding League Mn. Cities Insurance Trust League Mn. Cities Insurance Trust Lind, Leslie & Gladys e e 2-Trees $ Supplies Mats for Storm Sewer Long Distance Calls Sidewalk Repairs Safety Shoes Reimburse-Batteries 2 Squeegee's Overcharge-Permits Top Soil 6 Manuals Supplies Mte. Agreement N. 2nd Street Storm Sewer Dump Box Soap - Garage Garbage Bags Pipe/Bands Health Insurance Equipment Parts Lease/Mte. Sign Brackets/Blanks Pest Control Check Rear End #6107 Ad for Engineer Registration (3) Repair Generator Safety Shoes Boiler Engineer Safety Shoes Seed Mugs/Shirt Paint for Signs A/C Library & City Hall Safety Shoes Reimburse-Gatorade Supplies Appraisal-Hotel Project Film/Twine Reimburse-Meals Safety Shoes Safety Shoes Services Auto Parts Remove Fire Escapes Workers Compo Insurance Endorsement Land Purchase 149.06 42.82 194.26 97.71 1,000.00 86.84 17.53 85.20 6.00 34.08 30.00 170.78 203.28 2,962.50 5,727.55 11.50 53.65 706.14 219.23 64.36 742.30 487.55 218.33 234.58 69.00 315.00 153.81 26.99 200.00 39.99 24.00 110.74 52.65 5,233.77 66.99 20.97 139.44 1,200.00 35.32 35.00 100.00 32.36 429.00 76.12 160.00 32,406.00 248.00 927.00 Magnuson, David Magnuson, David Meyer Sewer Service Middle St. Croix Watrrshed Mn. Cellular One 3 M Minnesota correctiontl Facility Motorola, Inc. Northern States Powe Co. Nordic Parts Company Northern Water Works Northwestern Tire old Republic Surety Old Republic Insuran e One Hour Photo Expre s Polfus Implement P. O. S. T. Reichow, David Rigs & Squads Ritzer, Joseph Road Rescue I Ruffridge Johnson ~. Russell, Stephen St.. Croix Animal She ter St. Paul Pioneer Pre s Schell, Scott Schmidt, Scott Schwantes Sealmaster, Inc. Shiely Company Southam Business Corn unications Star Tribune Stepp Mfg. Company Stillwater Gszette Stillwater Towing T. A. Schifsky & Son Truck Utilities Uniforms Unlimited United Building Cent r U. S. West Cornrnunica ions Valley Trophy Center Van Paper Company Warning Lites Wilson, C. Michael Zarnoth Brush Works MANUAL CHECKS - AUGU T Brines Blue Cross Court Administrator Junker Sanitation Se vice Legal Services Reimburse-Expenses Pump Lift Station StiJ.lwater Share Mobile phones Letters-Street Signs Letterheads Service Agreement Street Lighting Brake Shoes Lift Station Repair Repairs/Tires Bond Fees-Land Purchase Film Processing Transmission License-Crimmins Reimburse-Parts Squad Car Equipment Safety Shoes Alcohol Wipes Roller Reimburse-Cookies July Charges Ad-City Engineer Safety Shoes Safety Shoes Install Grilles in CC Crack Filler Sand for Fire Works Ad - Bids-Traffic Ad-City Engineer Parts-Tar Kettle Ad-City Engineer Services Asphalt Install Crane Misc. Uniforms Cement Directory Advertising Trophy-Horsepulling Towels/Tissue Barricades Safety Shoes 8 Gutter Brooms NSF Check August Billing Deposit-Zachman August Payment . 6,146.66 82.31 675.00 "1,387.83 ' 112.95 304.80 29.26 159.79 10,155.66 23.44 1,077.74 282.66 100.00 130.00 44.41 862.51 10.00 2.00 7,766.28 67.97 40.42 10,532.85 6.58 173.27 71. 12 43.99 55.73 240.00 1,290.99 33.60 150.96 119.00 148.25 24.00 400.86 663.40 2,609.52 66.61 33.46 88.80 20.00 232.17 1,113.05 29.99 698.64 e e 30.00 3,512.04 50.00 96,000.00 e - ~ e Junker, Jeffrey Plattner, Earl Junker Sanitation Service Junker Sanitation Service M. W. C. C. Mn. Sex Crime Investigations Mn. State Planning Conference Nordquist, Richard Peltier, Bernard Postmaster Postmaster Postmaster Postmaster Postmaster Radisson Hotel Stafford, R. H. Washington County Treasurer Stillwater, Petty Cash Swanson, David Wood, Monroe ADDENDUM TO BILLS e American Linen Supply American National Bank A T & T Baker, Sharon Buberl Landscaping Capitol Communications Croix Oil Company Equipment Supply Inc. Fire Guard Gopher Bearing Company G & K Services Interpoll Laboratories Jay Bros. Inc. Junker Sanitation Service Lakes Gas Lawson Products League Minnesota Cities Mn. Correctional Facility Mn. Public Works Assn. Mn. Correctional Facility Moore Business Products Northern States Power; Co. Northwestern Service Inc. Northwestern Tire Co. Rigs & Squads Russell, Stephen St. Croix Car Wash Sealmaster, Inc. Short Elliott Hendrickson Snap on Tool Snyder Bros. Drug Socha, Gina e Safety Shoes Safety Shoes August Payment August Payment-Add'l~ SAC Charges-July Workshop-Swanson Terwedo/Russell Safety Shoes Prizes-Soap Box Derby Permit Mailing Permit Mailing Deposit-Newsletter Postage for Meter Deposit Newsletter Rooms-Terwedo/Russell Rbcord Cases Reimburse Petty Cash Sesquetennial Parade Safety Shoes Towel Service Paying Agent Fees Leased Equipment Sec'y Services Sod/Topsoil Repair Microphone Gas A/C Repairs Recharge 2 Extinguishers Equipment Parts Uniform Rental Water Sampling Payment No. 3 Recycling Gas vJashers/Nuts Membership Dues Envelopes Set Mailing Labels Print Building Permits Receipts for Machine Energy Charge Repairs-Library Repair Split Rim Tire Misc. Squad Car Equipment Reimburse-Shelving Squads Washed Crack Filler Engineering Replacement Tools Film/Supplies Refund Park Use 97.73 29.76 75,000.00 25,000.00' 20,418.75 75.00 230.00 66.99 700.00 161.65 828.70 50.00 1,000.00 500.00 136.00 96.00 123.97 12,000.00 100.00 41.55 1,964.42 54.37 76.50 129.93 74.55 3,494.60 200.92 21. 66 383.12 966.94 86.40 8,696.67 8,167.50 72.00 326.03 6,998.00 32.38 50.00 148.89 457.64 10,082.22 2,500.00 62.44 3,573.45 56.14 51.12 1,380.24 1,237.98 67.04 41.09 25.00 Stafford, R. H. Washtngton County Treasurer Stillwater Fire Reli'f Assn. Stillwater Towing Valley Auto Supply Watson, Dennis Wybrite Inc. Yocum Oil Company Laminate/Directories Fire State-Aid Tow 3 Squads Auto Parts Programming Hte. Contract Diesel-Flood Adopted by the Counc 1 this 7th day of September, 1993. APPROVED FOR PAYHENT ~ -. 20.38 -SO- , 3 4 0 . 0 0 105.00' 240.28 490.00 241. 00 341.17 e e e e e e A-I Paint Works 507 W. Middle Street Stillwater, Mn. 55082 Schreiber Mullaney Const. Co. 1286 Hudson Road St. Paul, Mn. 55106 APPLICATIONS September 7, 1993 Contractor's Licenses General Contractor General Contractor New New ~ r illwater ~ - -- ~ T H ;:; R T H P LA CEO F M IN N E SOT A ~ e APPLICATION TO CONSUME Applicant Information N2.me ':' f Ct~~!;} ?XI i z at i oY',___~i..'::!:-___LCJ...=:t.J:::L.~~~L_____________ ____________ App 1 i cant hlar:le (Fu 3. 1 ) I2~QJt.L~RJJ1.~-J_fJ:LJsLw~~{IJ2fLf_J.TLb'-L'-~5!~-b-Gl.-ff- St~~eet Add~~I~SS__~,!:L~'__JJ?q.Y::.I':::---____________ B i. t-t h Da,t e___~/~_~__ City _~.i;li~!:.T~~_____ St ,~,te__t!J.J::..'___________ Z i p_';::~~~____ Home Ph':IY',e__~.l~.::~~~~~__ Wm~k Pr,.:'ne_.!t!~_':.l_~~_c:___ Facility Information f~.ci 1 i ty to be used__6_~,:::!-:._~!__j?~L!:j~_________ P a t~ k O:o1'~ Date to be tlsed_~~;9.2.._____ Time t.:. be ,_tsed_LL;.::.::..(J_t!!____~':_(;_':!J1/L e Nl.tmbe~' of p'~t~s(ms expected___j_~_~~____________________ PurpQse (so:.ft ba 11 QCl.me, wedd i r,!~, et c. ) _0:!_rJdj!!{-oJJ.!.c!.t-2,7i::.bi.{;:_J=~'~_:..G..:.2J{.. Type of activity(fuY'ld l'~aiset~, d<=\Y'Icing, music, etc. )__El1::~_~_..f:'fU2..-f:._r,:_ -------------------------------------------------------~----------~-- Check Appropriate Information ./ __~~_Beel'~ t c. CO:'Y'lsume __~_Beel'~ to Sell 8" CQY'lsume ________Liquor.to Consume ________Liquor to Sell & Consume -----1"--- Wine tel Consurtle Wi Y'le t.:. Sell 8.: Corlsume Security Informat ion (Intel'~rlal Use OY'lly) Pol ice Officet~ Requit~ed by City? __~~s. _______Nea. Officer Rate of Pay $ Mail License To: (If different than applicant) e CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121 r CLAIM AGAINST CITY OF STILLWATER e NAME OF CLAIMANT CHRYSTAL B. MUELLER ADDRESS 242 Deer Path Ct. Stillwater PHONE NO. 439-2927 WHEN DID EVENT OCCUR? August 8, 1993 WHERE DID EVENT OCCUR? my family child care playyard in backyard WHAT HAPPENED?RLshing water caused by a heavy rain came down the hill through the day care playyard &AE washing away shredded bark depositing it in piles as far as 3D feet away in the neighbor's yard leaving mud and silt in the playyard rendering it impossible to use. e' WHY DO YOU FEEL THAT THE CITY WAS AT FAUL T:_ , _ " _ ~ The reason that the water cascades through our property is that the culvert opening on the hill above us which was designed to drain the platted roadway behind us (Interlachen) into the marsh was plugged with dirt, sand, debris, trees, shrubs, and therefore was inoperable. When the same thing happened last summer, we called the city about the plugged culvert and David .J u n k e r I 0 0 ked at ita n d sa i d t hat i t nee d s to be 0 p.e n e d W h FHl i t was not done last year, we called him several times about ge~ting the job completed**~ STATE THE NATURE OF THE DAMAGE AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED Ove Shredded bark in day care playyard was covered with mud'and silt. 3 yards shredded bark = $90 NAME OF PERSON MAKING REPAIR; OR GIVING CARE Abrahamson Nursery delivered 3 yards of bark. M~ husband performed the work. I / 55 2~ 93 'DATE I ~~<cL 6) ,^OJ ~, l' uJ SIGNATUR You have to formally notify the City in writing within thirty (30) days of the occurrence of an event whereby you feel you have suffered damages. e e ***and it never was. Onl after this last heavy rain did they come out and work on the culvert op ning. e e e e e '. I' ABRAHAMSON 20021 St. Croix Tr, t'-), Scandia, MN 55073 433-2431 NURSERIES / 2100 Tower Drive Stiliwater, MN 55082 439-2140 CUSTOMER'S ORDER NO, PHONE OTY, DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT ___9'a__:c-:Q__ <-I "ry:'y ~-~._---~~-T~--:--l-./------/."--'-'::.' .... --.5"751fr. .. - ... 1 ._____ . . L -------;)...- --;L.tI?f)~5/uxcd-J,c-/ --------- ---------- ----.--------7~L\;.-----~-- ---~- TAX REOCEIVED BY TOTAL 3056 All claims and returned goods MUST be accompanied by this bill. PROIJlICl610 ~cy~ APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT (UNIT PRICE CONlRACI) e ~O. )WNER: STILLWATER. MINNESOTA OWNER'S PROJECT NO. ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. 92280 _OCATION: STILLWATER.MlNNESOTA :Ol\'TRAcrOR:JA Y BROS.. INe. CONlRACT DATE 2209 PHELPS ROAD HUGO, MN 55038 CONlRACT AMOUNT $66,572.20 e :ONTR. r-oR: STORM SEWER IN TIlE NORTII 4TI1 ST. AND WEST WILKIN SlREET RAVINE ,\PPUC.DATE ~-6 ..0 A~ ~. I q q.3 ------.------ PERIOD END. _ ~ lAG ) M J ,,~) 1 f 9 0 '~ { I' APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT --------- CONlRACTQUAN1TIY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANITIY TO DATE PRICE TOTAL ..---.-------------- ------------------------...-----------...----.---------- ----------------------- CLEAR TREE EA, 3 100.00 S $ GRUB TREE EA. 3 100.00 S $ REMOVE CATCH BASlN EA. 150.00 S ( $ '~O,"'" REMOVE 12~ C.M.P. LF. 14 5.00 S Ii $ "1 D. qQ REMOVE CONe. CURB &. GlTITER LF. 12 5.00 S $ REMOVE CONC. smEW ALK S.F. 75 2,00 S $ REMOVE BIT. PAVEMENT S,Y, 7 5,00 S $ RELOCATE STONES LS, 2500.00 S $ REMOVE DEAD TREES LS. 3000.00 S ~ 4. $ 8" D,LP. CL 52 LF. 65 65.00 S $ 24" R.C.P. CL II LF. 116 41:50 S $ 30" R.C.P. CL II LF. 90 53,30 S $ '-110 (,o DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LBS, 46 5,00 S $ ')...30 30" R.c. APRONW/TRASHGUARD EA, 1200.00 S $ 'do.- I.>l> 30" X 24" R.C, REDUCER EA, 2 500,00 S $ IODO, 36" X 30" R.C. REDUCER EA, 3 750.00 S $ CATCH BASIN DESIGN X LF, 4,0 100,00 S 4 $ L/. f)D 00. MAl'\'HOLE DESIGN B LF. 23.8 189.00 S ~3,8 $ 449g,d.-b CASTING R.1916,E EA, 3 500,00 S $ CASTING R-3250,1 EA, 500,00 S $ Lf() oD RA~DOM RIP RAP c.y, 24.3 65.00 S $ )..-looD. CO~c. CURB & GUITER DES, B618 LF, 12 20,00 S $ e nGE 1 or3 SHORT ELLIOlT HENDRICKSON lNC. APPLlCAT ON FOR PAYMENT - Continued Total Contract Amount $ 66 , 572. 20 1- Total Amount Earned $ /Lp I~ 'is , d-!) Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not I corporated into. WOrk__. $ \. ' Contract Change Order No. I Percent Complete I DO'1b $ ;J-.;L 0, L, \.~I Dt:> Contract Change Order No. d--- ~ Percent Complete I!) n i~ $ /.p /.p 08, if{) Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete $ *' ~ ~ GROSS AMOUNT DUE............m..........$ 'I",; '7 ?, 9 <It) o..oldi.J:l-/ ~ t2 ,[). 1J: J- ~ LESS 0 % RETAINAGE..................$ ? ~ .L0 ()l~J . r AMOUNT DUE TO DATE .....................$ 45'7 -39. LtD l-ESS PREVIOUS APPLlCATION._........$ .3 '7 () 4[L, 7, ') v. \\ AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION .....$ ~ G 90 . U 1 P \)1 e CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby s ears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress pay- ments received from the Owner on ccount of work performed under the contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigne~ to discharge in full all obligations of the undersigned incurred in connection with work covered by prion Applications for Payment under said contract, and (2) all materi- als and equipment incorporated in sald Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all lienS, claims, security interests and encumbrances. Dated dJA- (p ~ ~ .119~. Jay Brothel,", rne. (Contractor) BY:,4~~~ S"C /{;"s , N nd litle} e ~~~~FOF~~ 211 SS Before me n this ay of , 19~ personally appeared known to me ho being duly s~prn, did depose and say of the Contractor above mentioned; that he (Office) . executed the above Application for P yment and Affidavit on behalf of sa!, ,n r OHP. AtIl 1 the statements contained therein are rue, correct and complete. ~:~.. NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA . ~ -;>~ . ' RAMSEY COUNTY ~ ..' My Comm. Expires July 22. 1997 . VVVV\NVVVVVVVVVVWVVVVVVVVVVVWVVV . My Commission Expires: '[ - J--2>- -'1 ( (Notary Public) The undersigned has checked the ontractor's Application for Payment shown above. A part of this , Appli~tion is the Contractor's Affida it stating that all previous payments to him under this Contract have been applied by him to dischar e in full all of his obligations in connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment. In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the Amount Due. Date Page 3 afjTc.rzllt'~ICKSON. INC. By ;ft - \ ~ e of 3 e e e TO: FR: DA: RE: MEMORANDUM ::::: :::1::~YF::::::1Director VI ~ September 3, 1993 ~ UTILITY BILL ADJUSTMENTS The following are requests for and recommendations made to utility bills: 1. 2. 3. Description Water pipe broke and was fixed March 1993. Two toilets leaking were fixed in 2nd quarter of 1993. Toilet leaked and was fixed in March 1993. Recommendation Adjust July 1993 and future billings to prior year usage of 27/gal./qtr. Adjust July 1993 and future billings to prior average of 9/gal./qtr. Adjust July 1993 and future billings to prior average of 17/gal./qtr. Attn: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 4IJ Brian Longseth regarding your comments St.Paul Pioneer Press 8-18-93 South Hill Sewer Project I am on of the 20% who wants the sewer project to proceed. lam by no means one of those rich people you say are the only ones wanting this project to proceed. I want sewer for the following reasons: 1. I am a normal middle class person who wants to do laundry at home without water up to my knees by the third load. 2. I'd like to have company and allow them more than one flush per visit. 3. I am a concerned citizen who doesn't like the idea of my neighbors pumping their waste into their yards. 4. I am concerned and understand when people are talking about all the problems they are having and am willing to pay my share for the benefit of all of us on the South Hill. 5. I am sick and tired of my neighbors whining about costs when they wouldn't think twice about buying a car or van for almost $ 20,000 payable in 5 years. ,~ commend the city council for proc~eding with this project and thinking about the overall good for us now and for our future. ~) 5~~ Jeanne Schwietz e WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 . STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006 Office (612) 430-6003 Fax Machine (612) 430-6017 TO: Washington County Communities rY7 f. . ~ Chuck Swanson, County Administrator l ~U{t{ August 24, 1993 FROM: DATE: RE: Washington County 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan As part of the county's annual budget process, Washington County prepares a five-year capital improvement plan (C.I.P.). The C.I.P.includes the county's plans for public facilities; highway construction and right-of-way acquisition; parks improvements and land acquisition; special projects and technology; and equipment, furnishings and information services. The first year of this plan is consistent with the current year proposed operational budget; the other four years are projected needs and costs which may change in the future. e Attached is a draft of Washington County's 1994-1998 Capital Improvement Plan. The projects in this document were reviewed and given preliminary approval by the Washington County Board of Commissioners at a workshop on August 18, 1993. The County Board will approve a final draft C.I.P. in November. A public hearing to adopt the c.I.P. will be held on December 7, 1993. A memorandum documenting any changes to the plan will be sent to you after the final public hearing. Please retain this draft for your files. If you have any questions or comments regarding the projects in this C.I.P., please contact Jane Harper, Office of Administration, at 430-6011 before October 15,- 1993, so that your comments can be represented at the November County Board Workshop. As always, thank you for your interest in the operations of Washington County. Isb Attachment cc: Jane Harper e 'rinted on Recycled Paper EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Charles J, Swanson County Administrator Virginia Erdahl Deputy Administrator Sheila Neubauer Office Manager ~ ~ 00 ~~. ~ ~OTQ"... ..~' ~o...\ .. 04\ ~I ~ ~ ~(".. ~.I...... . Reu..' e e W ASt\tNG10N COUN1'1 MtNNES01A CAPtl AL tMPRO"EMENl PROGRAM . 1994-1998 w~!A~ AUGUS1, 199: TABLE OF CONTENTS e Page # Explanation of Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I Summary Tables Table 1: General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds Series 1989A, July I, 1993 Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 Table 2: 1989A Capital Improvement Bonds - Project Status, July 1993 ............................... 5 Table 3: 1994-1998 Capital Projects Proposed for Funding from 1989 A Capital Bond Proceeds ....................... 6 Table 4: 1994-1998 Expenditures by Project Category and Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7 Table 5: 1994-1998 Expenditures by Source of Funds and Project Category ............................. 8 Table 6: 1994-1998 Expenditures by Source of Funds and Year ..................................... 9 e Project Schedule Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 Highway and Right-of-Way Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 Parks Development and Land Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ',' . . . . . . . . . .. 18 Special Projectsffechnology ...................................... 19 Equipment, Furnishings and Information Services ....................... 20 Project Descriptions Public Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 Highway and Right-of-Way Acquisition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33 Parks Development and Land Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 42 Special Projectsffechnology ...................................... 49 Equipment, Furnishings and Information Services ....................... 56 e e EXPLANATION OF PROGRAM The Washington County Capital Improvement Program (C.I.P.) is a comprehensive schedule of special project and equipment needs. This plan reflects the county's long-range physical development policies and priorities. The projects programmed for funding are based on urgency. and- the ability to finance. The C.I.P. is for a five-year period, and is updated annually. It sets forth the schedule, timing, estimated cost, sources of funding to pay for the improvement, and specific details of each capital improvement project. The first year conforms to the proposed operating budget. Each year, this program is updated and extended one year to reflect changing conditions, circumstances and needs. The plan covers nonrecurring expenditures over $1000 in five categories: public facilities; highway construction and right-of~way acquisition; parks and land acquisition; equipment, furnishings and information services; and special projects/technology. The plan includes projects that extend into or begin in any of the years in the 5-year planning cycle. Projects included in this C.I.P. have the following characteristics: 1. Projects over $1000. 2. Lease-Purchase Agreements (LPA). 3. Have an expected useful life of five years or more. e The following describes the information listed in the following tables. C.I.P. Proiect Number A number assigned to each project as they are initiated. This number identifies the project and will remain with the project until it is completed. The C.I.P. number is used in reviewing the status of ongoing projects and evaluating past years' efforts and accomplishments as C.I.P. projects are completed. ., Service Number Indicates the account that funding for the project will come from. Proiect Name. Location or Department Title and geographic location of project and the department responsible for the project. First Year Prol!rammed Year project first submitted and listed on program. In cases where the first year programmed is several years prior to the recommended programming, funding has been deferred to that year. e 1 ~~~.~ e Estimated total cost of project 'ncluding land acquisition, planning, engineering, construction, furnishings and contingencies, xcept where indicated otherwise. For projects that involve other agencies, unless otherwi noted, only those costs borne by the county are listed. The total cost of the project is indi ated in the project description. Amount Com leted Throu h Current Year On multi-year projects already underway, the amount already expended. Next Five- Year Cost Costs that are scheduled for th s project for the next five years. Fundin1! Source Financing method for project. Projects may be financed by current, borrowed, local contributions, or grant funds, 0 any combination of these respective sources. If more than one funding source is used, th amounts to be spent from each revenue source are listed in the same column below the fu ding source. Projects listed as unfunded have been approved in concept by the County Boar but the funding sources have not been determined. Recommended Prol!ramminl! Scheduled amounts to be spent on individual projects for the 5-year planning cycle. Costs to complete projects beyond the ve years are included in the column marked "Future". e Detailed project narratives are ndexed by Capital Improvement Numbers in the section following the project lists. Financinl! the Prol!ram In 1989, Washington County s ld $24.8 million worth of bonds to finan~C?various highway and building projects. The stat s of these funds and the projects funded to date are in Tables land 2. Funding needs abov this amount will be met using a variety of methods. The major financing methods in W shington County are reviewed below. When dollars are available, funds are spent in th following order: federal, state, county and local. General Fund Revenues are a consolidation of the many taxes, licenses, permits, and service charges that the county is allo ed to levy by state statute. The county draws its operating or current expenditures for each y ar from this fund. Some capital improvement projects are also financed from this fund. e 2 e e .;,.' e General Oblie;ation Bonds are notes for borrowed monies which a county may acquire by attaching a separate tax to county residents tax bills in order to pay back a loan over a number of years. Revenue Bonds are notes for borrowed monies which are attained on the anticipation that there will be sufficient revenue generated by the projeCt to be fmanced to payoff the loan with interest. Metropolitan. State and Federal Grants-in-Aid are monies supplied by the Metropolitan Council, and state and federal governments for certain local projects when they meet goals which are of national, state or regional importance. These funds may range from as small as a 10% contribution to a 100% cost grant. Special Fundine; is any of a number of specific taxes or local contributions that supply money for a specific project or operation. An example of such a fund would be a public benefit tax for construction of roads and drainage ditches. This tax would be considered a special assessment tax. Lease/Purchase Ae;reement is used when the county levies for the debt service of another governmental unit. Bonds are sold by a city or the Housing Redevelopment Authority to fund various capital projects. The county uses an annual appropriation to generate income to make the lease/purchase payments. This annual appropriation is outside the county's levy limit. Unfunded are projects that the county would like to pursue but a specific funding source has not been identified. 3 e e e Table 1 . -GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 1989A DECEMBER 31,1992 FIGURES , PROJECT SUMMARY REVISED JUNE 1,1993 1989 CIP Bond Proceeds Plus: Interest Earnings Reimbursement from LEC.bonds Expenditures Completed Projects Projects Under Contract 1992-93 Budgeted Projects (inc. 1994-95 costs of $257,500) 1993 Operating Transfer to Pay Debt Service Levy Debt Service (Interest Only) Estimated Arbitrage Liability $24,800,000 4,548,355 2,070,582 8,133,345 8,630,491 4,048,000 1,876,300 891,017 250,000 .:IEi., 4 CIP# 1008 1015 2103 2107 2124 2155 2151 3007 1006 1024 1035 2113 2140 2115 2141 4009 5000 1000 1049 2000 2056 2071 2142 2190 4011 4012 4027 Table 2 WASHINGTON COUNTY 989A CAPIT AllMPROVEMENT BONDS PROJECT DETAil Shed Wildwood Branch lib CSAH 13 (Radio Dri CSAH 16 (Valley Cre k Rd Woodbury) Square Lake Beach uilding i?:::'sUB'tor/& law Enforcement Ce ter Courts Expansion (S hematic Design) Parking Structure CR 50 (200th & 202 St Forest Lake) CR 57 (152nd St N H 0) CR 50 (Harrow Ave TH 61 Forest Lake Township) Sheriff's Firing Range Sheriff's Radio Syste COST e 117,308 914,560 279,000 202,768 27,778 248,749 . It.j~i~1~ 2,070,582 250,000 4,583,021 590,600 301,788 363,000 121,500 350,000 ;;;::SU"':"':::':'B";':l1':':'O:':'::m:':'''A'':':'L:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::$8:"";':"::63:"""'::0:'::;::4':':9':':::1;:";:: ,.. .. ..-......................... . "... ... . .. ... ............................ .. .. , .. n.. ....., ..__........................ _ .. ...,,, ". . . ,... ............................. . . .. . .. .... ............................ -.,.. ... ." -.. .......................... - .. ;:;:;:::::;:;:::;:;:;::::;.;::.;.;:::;.:.::;:;:;.:.::;:::::;::;::::;:;:;:::;:;:::::::::::;::::;:::::::;:::::::;'::~;':':;:':::'::~::'::::::::;::::: ..... .................... ........... . :;:::'::::,::::::::",,:::::::~:"::::~~~g9~~yggi!8'~~~EMis, ,:-':-:::\0' Physical Plant Projec Parks Maintenance F cility Mise, Highway Recon truction and Overlays CSAH 29 (Cedar and Hall Ave) CR 64 (McKusick Ro d Stillwater) CR 54 (180th St & Ju y Ave Forest Lake Township) CR 8A (TH 61 to Goo view Ave., Hugo) Land Information Syst m Computer Assisted M ss Appraisal System Land Userrransporta n Plan ..... .. ...... ....... .. ..... ....... ",.:=::suatdtAt:i:://,:,:?' 5 e 500,000 500,000 250,000 176,000 980,000 170,000 750,000 361,000 71,000 290,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :,:::::::::I*m~gQP ._2 e Table 3 e 1994.1998 CAPITAL PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR FUNDING FROM 1989 CAPITAL BOND PROCEEDS e a:table3 6 Table 4 WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1994.1998 EXPENDITURES* BY PROJECT CATEGORY AND YEAR YEAR PROJECT CATEGORY 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1994.1998 TOTAL nllDI II" I: A 1"11 ITII:O I]l]n~ n ~'7AAn U:'7C n ~I]~n n nn nn A ,l:50.nn HIGHWAY AND RIGHT-OF.WAY 4074,0 5250.0 2519.0 3670.0 2720.0 5565.0 19,724.00 ACQUISITION PARKS DEVELOPMENT AND 505.0 606.0 2049.0 2392.0 2633.0 1327.0 9,007.00 LAND ACQUISITION . SPECIAL PROJECTS 877.0 369.0 355.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 764.00 EQUIPMENT, FURNISHINGS AND 1514.Q 906.0 1337.0 1182.0 1100.0 668.0 5,193.00 INFORMATION SERVICES** TOTAL 9,173,00 8,875.00 7,836.00 8,514.00 6,453.00 7,560.00 39,238.00 *Dollars in thousands. ..One-half of the departments did not report for 1995-1998. i. tlllllO( e e e e e e Table 5 WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1994.1998 EXPENDITURES" BY SOURCE OF FUNDS AND PROJECT CATEGORY 00 FUNDING SOURCE PROJECT CATEGORY GENERAL FEDERAL STATE METRO SPECIAL LEASE REVENUE BONDS GRANTS GRANTS GRANTS FUNDS PURCHASE UNFUNDED TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES 57.0 4397.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.0 0.0 0.0 4,550.00 HIGHWAY AND RIGHT .QF.W A Y 5214.0 1575.0 0.0 7155.0 0.0 1355.0 0.0 4425.0 19,724.00 ACQUISITION PARKS DEVELOPMENT AND 452.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6844.0 1711.0 0.0 0.0 9,007.00 LAND ACQUISITION SPECIAL PROJECTS 249.0 465.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 50.0 764.00 EQUIPMENT, FURNISHINGS AND 5193.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,193.00 INFORMATION SERVICES"" TOTAL 11,165,00 6,437.00 0.00 7,155.00 6,844.00 3,162.00 0.00 4,475.00 39,238,00 .Dollars in thousands. ..One-half of the departments did not report for 1995-1998. *lIIlIoS Table 6 WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1994.1998 EXPENDITURES- BY SOURCE OF FUNDS AND YEARS FUNDING SOURCE YEAR GENERAL FEDERAL STATE METRO SPECIAL LEASE REVENUE BONDS GRANTS GRANTS GRANTS FUNDS PURCHASE UNFUNDED TOTAL 1993 2800.0 2477.0 2.0 2548.0 500.0 249.0 597.0 nn . .9.t73.0Q_ 1-.- . 1994 1431.0 3339.0 0.0 3215.0 352.0 538.0 0.0 0.0 8,875.00 1995 3536.0 1913.0 0,0 100.0 1392.0 845.0 0.0 50.0 7,836.00 1996 2329.0 1185.0 0.0 2240.0 2043.0 717.0 0.0 0.0 8,514.00 1997 2219.0 0.0 0.0 1500.0 2038.0 606,0 0.0 90.0 6,453.00 1998 1650,0 0,0 0.0 100.0.. 1019.0 456.0 0.0 4335.0 7,560.00 TOTAL 11,165.00 6,437.00 0,00 7,155.00 6,844.00 3,162.00 0.00 4,475.00 39,238.00 *Dollars in thousands. LIIill06 e e e e PUBLIC FACILITIES PROJECTS 1994-1998 ,......U..U.._....hh.U._.._..~._..........................................._._.......UhhU......................UU.............,..........................,...........hU..................;.......,....................................................................................................... 1 CIP ~ : Project Name ~ 1st ! Total ! Amount ! Next i Revenue! Retommended Programming" ! 1 Project 1 and 1 Year Cost! Completed ! 5-Year ! Source ! I .' .:;.. .;. .. ;................._..........................0............................................................., ~ Number 1 i Location 1 Pro- , 1994 1 thru i Cost" i t 1994 ~ 1995 ~ 1996 ! 1997 ! 1998 1 Future I L.................L..........L.........,.......nnmm.......................L.~~~~~~.J.,.,~~~~~~.....L......~,~.~'~..m..L...........,...Ln...'.n....'...,L.,.....,...Ln......'..,.L...,....,..,.L.....,...,...L............,L...............l ~ 1028 1 Library, Valley Branch Sne Purchase 1 1988 206.0 t ! O,O! UF i ~ 1 ' i 1 206.0! I I (~briRequests 1998) I <;' I I I I 1 1033 ~ Library, West-Gentral W. Cty Branch ~ 1989 1550.0 I 1550.0 I B ~ 1550,0 ~ ~' 1 ~ Const~dion (Library Requests 1994) ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~,! , ~ ~ ~ 1 : 1036 ~ Llbrat'}!, Woodbury Branch ExpanSIOn ~ 1989 1000,0 ! 0.0 i UF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (LbrarY Requests 1996) ~ 1 1 1 i : i :; :: ~ ~ 1000 1 Phys~ Plant Projects 1 1993 800,0 ! 5OO,O! 300,0 B 300,0 1 ~ ~ ~ 1025 ~ AUdnotrrreasurer. Assessor & 1 1988 1185.0 1 1185,0 i B 1 11185.0 ! ~ 1, 1 Recor~er Add~ion, Stillwater 1 1 1 ~ , ,I ,; ", ~ 1031 1 Underground Storage Tank ~ 1989 223.3 ;,1 170,0 i 53.3! B 53,3 ~ ~ ~ i I RepL14ement i i i i i ~ 1032 j Govet1lment Center Remodeling ~ 1990 SO.O ! 40,0 t 10,0 I GR 10,0 1 ~ 1 1 1 (Com. isvcs, Work Team Area) ~ 1 1 j ~ : : I: ::: ! 1039 1 ADA ~ccessibility 1 1993 159,9 ! 30.0 i 129,9! B 129,9 ~ 1 i ~ 1048 ~ Histor~ Courthouse Remodeling ~ 1985 552.0 ! 456.0 I 96.0 l SF 33,0 1 18.0 1 45,O! ~ ~ 1051 ~ Light ~ixture. Replace.-N, Shop ~ 1994 8,0 ! 0.0 I 8,O! GR 8,0 1 j ~ .2 I Parkin~, Lot Overlay-N.Shop I 1994 25,0 I O,O! 25.0 i GR 25,0 I I I 1 1053 t Auto Qoor OpenerlN. Entrance 1 1994 5,5 l 0.0 I 5.51 GR 5,5 ~ 1 1 i 1054 i Public ]Norks Remodeling i 1994 70.3 1 0,0 I 70.3j- B 70.3 ! i I ! ! (Eng, fork Team Area) i Iii ! ! 1 1055 j Old Jail Remodel 1 1994 200,0 l O,O! 200,0 i B 200.0 1 1 i 1 ~ ~ I ; ~ ~ ~ i ~ ! 1056 i Court rodil. per Judges Request i 1994 908,51 O.O,!i 908.5! B 908,5 L ! i ~ 1057 j Parkin$ Ramp Snow Gate ~ 1994 8,0 ! 8,O! GR 1 8.0 ~ 1 i)))0:)lff;:::;J0i:;L:IgI~~l:;)l:::;:!ij;iLllj:bi~~!dr;r;)if~~;~!:~~J1ijl;;Jg~J~~L~!;B.Lj~:~j;;L~J1~~1 "DoUars listed in tJusands Funding Key: F .. Federal Grant B.. 1989 Cap~a1 Bonds Is.. State Grant ' GR .. General Revenue (levy) M .. Metropol~an Grant SF .. Special Fund, Local Unn of Government Contribution LP .. Lease Purchase l 1000,0 ! I I UF .. Unfunded e alOlAlflc.cIll 10 i i WASHlfGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAYS .1993 BUDGETED PROJECTS TO BE COMPLETED IN 1994 - r......cip.....T'..,.................p'~o~.N~~.....................T........lsi.......f.......;:~i~.....T....A;;;~~~I'..T....N;~...T.R~~~~~;T'........'....,.,...,.R;~;;;;;;~~-;;d.p~;;g;;j;;;i~g~..........,._.........'! ~ Project ~ and ~ Year Cost I Completed I S-Year I Source L...........................,........,.........................,...............,..,.,.......,....; ~. Number ~ Location ~ Pro- ; 1993 1 thru ~ Cost. 1 ! 1993 ~ 1994 ~ 1995 ! 1996 ! 1997 ~ Future . r---ii\ifNOt;pe-i:OCaiiOO"1~~~--ffl<'~:J-'993:_+---!----j!-I--II-j~-j 1 1 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 1 ! 1 ~ i 1 ~ 2100 ! 13 CSAH, Major Collector 1 ~ 1986 470 470 S i 470! j ! j ~ Mi. N CR 10 to CSAH 6, ~ ~ ~ j ! 2102 i 27 ~~:~dor, TH 244 i 1986 260 260 S 260 i i ! j ~ to 1 Mi. N. Mahtomedi ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ Right-of-Way, W.B.L., 1 ! j ~ i , BI-.oo i I I ! j ~ TRAFFIC SIGNALS ~ j j ~ ~ ~ CSAH, Tora~ic Signals per j 1993 200 200 SISF 200 ~ ~ j i ~ ~ Dept. Pnonty 1 1 1 1 I I 2183 ! 10 CSAH, Traffic Signal at ! 1993 100 100 S 1oo!! !; i ! Hem. Avo, L1k& an. ! i i i.. i I SAFETYITRAFFIC CAPACITY I i I I l ~ ~ MisceDaneous j 1993 t 50, ! 50 ! GR , 50 f f ; i j l .DoIIars listed in thousands Funding Key: B = 1989 Capital Bonds GR = General Revenue Oevy) .- SF = Special Fund, Local Un~ of Government Contribution LP . Lease Purchase a:capimp.d1l e 11 e WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAYS -1994 r'm'cip......~........,.............j:i'~~i~'N;j~'....................T'....m1'~I.....m[".....;:~i~......r....A~~~~i.....r...'N'~Xi-..'rR~~~~~~T................_....'R~~~~~~d;j'P~~~~~i~g~......'..m...m'....! ~ Project ~ and ~ Year Cost! Completed ! 5-Year I Source ! 1 f:::lm"ml::nmmmm+g;:~J~;:I,;U~j~~mtmmfi~~r'~~ri~Ii~iTi~T~~:1 : : Rd, No, Type location : i :: :, I 2000 I Misc. Highway Projects I 1993 500,0 ! 25O,O! 2SO,O! B 2SO,O I I I I : ~ RIGHT-oF.WAY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2191 ~ 14 CSAH, CSAH 15 to ~ 1993 15,0 ! 15.0 i S 15,0 ~ ~ ~ ! m2116 =':;,=~ ! 1~4 ~.O I Mol s ~o ! j I ~ ~ CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS ~ : ~ ~ ~ 2106 j 5 CSAH, Minor Arterial ~ 1986 1830.0 l 1830.0! SISF 11830.0 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ TH36to Croixwood Blvd, ~ ;,: 1800130 ! :: : ~ : and Right-of-Way, ~ ' l :: : I I Stillwater I I I I ~ 2203 ~ 13 CSAH, CSAH 6to 1 Mi. S ~ 1994 !. 485.0 I 485,O! SIGR 485.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ j and Right-of-Way, Lake j I 470/15 j j j It,~ Elmo ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~9 !21 ~~~~ i 1~ ~.ol ~ol:~ ~DI I 1 ~ 2114 ~ 52 CR, Local CSAH 3 to j 1986 975,0 I 975,0 ! B 975,0 ~ ~ ~ I Im~RC:A:S=dBT~'1 I I j' I i ~ 2195 ~ 16 CSAH at Tower Drive, ~ 1994 100,0 I 1oo,O! SISF 100,0 ~ ~ j I I Woodbury I SO/SO I I I j 2192 ~ 19 CSAH S. Ramp 1-94, ~ 1993 100.0 [.: 1oo.0! SISF 100.0 ~ ~ : I I Woodbury I ' SO/SO I I i : 2193 : 19 CSAH at Hudson Rd, ~ 1993 100,0 100,0 ',,:,:, SISF 100.0 ~ ~ ~ I I Woodbury i SO/SO ~ I I 1 2194 ~ 22 CSAH at TH61 , Newport 1 1994 100,0 ! 1oo,O! SISF 100.0 ~ ~ i I SMmrrRAFRC CAPAa~ i ~! I ~ 2208 ~ Curb Cuts - ADA ~ 1994 100,0 ! 100,0 ! B 100.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Compliance ~ ~: _~ I I I I :: :: ;:: : ~ 12 WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM e i""CiPT--p~"N;;;-Ti~\-rf;;j:i:~;:;'~N.;~-i~T~~~;;d~P;~~;--i ~ Project ~ and ~ Y;~ ! Cost ! Completed! 5-Year ! Source L.,............"..............v.....,.........,......,..........,......................,........! ~ Number ~ location ~ Pro-: ! 1994 ! thru ! Cost' t t 1994 ~ 1995 ~ 1996 ~ 1997 ; 1998 ~ Future i L.............,..,L,.,..,...,.".,.."........,..".".....,..,.....,.,.,..."....,~,.,~~~~i......L.~~~~~..J......~.~~,~....",[.,............,..1".....,........J.............,J..............L..,...,....,.L..,......,.,.I......,.....,..,~",....."......J ~ j PRESERVATION & PAVEMENT ~ ' ; t t I ; j j I I j ; ~ ~ REHABILITATION j!! ! ! j ~ ~ I 1 ~ ! ~ 2196 ~ 16 CSAH, Bielenberg to ~ 1994 100,0 ! 100.0 Is! 100,0 ~ ~ ~ , . ~ I ~ ~ CSAH 13 MitvOverlay, ~ i ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ Woodbury 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~; ~ ~ 1 2197 ~ CSAHs, Overlay, 51. Paul ~ 1994 50,0 ! 50,0 ! 5 50,0 1 ~ ~ I 1 ' Park ~ ~ ~ 1! 2198 ! 55 =~~~~ 1'994 1150 i 115.0! GR "5.0! I '! 2199 t 21 ~:~~g~~~~~a~: Alton I 1994 110,0 ! 110,0 1 GR 110,0 I I I 2200 ! 68 ~LO;:~.'~CSAH! 1994 650 I 650 I GR 65.0 i I I 2201 ~ 15A CR, D~ Correction, New ~ 1994 100.0 ! 1oo.0! GR 100.0 ~ ~ j ! ~C~: T~~~ i 1994 11~0 i 11~.0 i GR j! I ~ L3;;J;;;;:1;i;;;::0i;iJ;;W1jJ,9];~;;;;JJ.8;;;;J;iJ!;:!;!;;J;;J;j;;;~I:~!~~!p,;I;;;;!;;;;;;i;,~!I;.~;ii~!!2;;:i;;!;;;5ii~;i)~!j;;~ii!;;;!3;g~j;;;!j;~;t!!!;;ifflg;!i;Gi,i~g~ UF = Unfunded B = 1989 Capital Bonds GR = General Revenue (levy) SF = Special Fund, Local Unit of Government Contribution lP = lease Purchase 'DonIDSI~tedinthousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant.S = State Grant M = Metropolitan Grant II\WY94.dlt e 13 e WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAYS -1995 ,l'u................................................__.......____...................................................,.__.........._........."........................,..__.........._._....._...........................................................___.................____...................................., j CIP ~ Project Name ~ 1st ' Total 1 Amount ! Next ! Revenue i Recommended Programming" ! [ Project j and [Year Cost f Completed ! 5-Year 1 Source ! ! ., .,:- .; ~.............h.-..n.~..............._._......u.....u__..............................................i 1 Number 1 location 1 Pro- 1994! thru I Cost" ! i 1994 i 1995 i 1996 1 1997 i 1998 i Future I r--':.~:.~:~=-I~edL[)o~:Ll~~:L__L-Lm_"lmmmi-m_L-Lmmmr--J I 2000 I ~=-~ H9hway I 1993 750.0 i ~O i 2500 i 8 ! 2500, I [ 1 RIGHT-oF.WAY 1 1 1 1 ~ 2162 ~ 16 CSAH, Major Collector ~ 1989 50.0 ; 50,0 I GR ~ 50,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Interlachen Drive to ~ ~ ~ ~ i i CSAH19 4-lane i ! i i ~ ~ f I ~ ~; ~ j [ Woodbury [ , j [ 1 ~ 2130 i 3 CSAH, Major Collector ~ 1987 100,0 ! 100.0 I SF i 100.0 i 1 ~ ~ TH97 to 1/4 Mi. S. of ~ I!! I ! NoMy.~ I I I I ! I CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS I I I _ I TRAFFIC SIGNALS I I I j 1 CSAH & CR Traffic f 1995 400,0 1 400.0 I GRlSFIS ! 1 400,0 1 I I Signals per Depl. Priorny I i '~~I ! I I ! i SMETYIlRAfRC CAPAaTY ! i I I I MisceUaneous Projects I 1995 SO.O I SO,O GR I, SO.O I t f f . l. ~ ! ! PRESERVAnON & PAVEMENT ! j j ~ j REHABILlTAnON 1 1 ~ ~ 2191 ~ 14 CSAH, Major Collector ~ 1993 300,0 300,0; GR ~ 300.0 j ~ ~ CSAH15 to CSAH21 ~ ~ ~ : ~ (includes curve safety ~ [i ! improve""'nI). Ba~own ! i i I t;lm;;lliji.jbi!.!!::::;:~l'!:lj;).:t1!~~.':..j.l!~~~~lj;!;:.~Iti;:;:;!.iG;0:!tEji~J:~;i~l~jl!:1:~;[tl;I.~[Ji::::::~~ "DoRars listed in thousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant S = State Gran! M = Metropol~an Grant B = 1989 Cap~a1 Bonds GR = General Revenue (levy) SF = Special Fund, Local Un~ of Government Contribution LP = Lease Purchase e UF = Unfunded aJrwy95,<Ilr 14 WASH NGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAYS .1996 e r..'..cip'....T..................,.P;~~.N~~......................r........1~i.....'r.....T~i~...'..'r.....A;;;~~'~i.....T....N~~....rR~;:.;~~~T...'........_.........R~;;;;;;;;;~~d'~'p~;;g~;;;i~g~'........,..,......,...! 1 Project ~ and 1 Ye ( Cost ! Completed! 5-Year ! Source L....,...,...,.................".........n.............:......,................................1 1 Number 1 location 1 Pro- , 1994 ! thru \ Cost' ! ! 1994 ~ 1995 1 1996 ! 1997 ! 1998 ~ Future ! !mmi-_m-T~"'l~~:j~~~!_mm!m_J-mrmmmTml-mlm_+"_mml j 1 Rd. No, Type location 1 1 \ ~ ! i i ~GHT~WAY Ii: I 1 2207 13 CSAH, CSAH 4 to TH97 ~ 1994 100,0 1 1oo,O! GR ~ 100.0 ~ I I COR~DOR W.PROVEMENTS ! ! i ~ 2162 ~ 16 CSAH, Major Collector 1 1989 1300,0 ! 13OO,O! SFIS 1 1300.0 ! ~ j j Interlachen Dr, to CSAH ~ ! 200/1100 ! l 1 ~ 1 19, 4-lane, Woodbury 1 ! 1 ~ 1 2130 ~ 3 CSAH, Major Collector ~ 1987 1040,0 i 1040.0 ! S ~: i ~ 1 ~ TH97 to 1/4 Mi. S. of ~ ~ 1 I I NMh Qy. l., i I! 1 ~ TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1 1 1 1 ~ CSAH & CR Traffic 1 1996 400,0 ! 400.0 ! GRlSFIS I ~ 400.0 r 1 j ~ Signals per Dept. Prty. ~ i ! 100/200/ I ~ ~ ' , 100 I . I iSAmv~CCAPAaTY I !. i I I I Miscellaneous I'rojeds : 1996 80.0 ! 80.0 I GR I 80.0 i I j ~ PRESERVATION & PAVEMENT 1 i ~ ~ 1 1 REHABILITATION 1 i i 1, 1 I I O<erlay 15 m~ I 1996. 750.0 i 150.0: GR i T 750.0 I I 1;;::::::::::::::;;;;;:;;;:;;2tgf.~;;;;;::;;;!;:::;;;;:i:;~~~~L:::;;&~l:F,~Ri:;;=;::;;l:;;;&I;s;~~lim~::t21~:~?~;:;:;~jj 'Dollars listed in thousands , Funding Key: F = Federal Grant S = State Grant M = Metropolnan Grant B .. 1989 Cap~aI Bonds GR .. General Revenue (levy) SF = Special Fund, local Un~ of Government Contribution lP .. lease Purchase UF .. Unfunded r alroy964t e WASHINGTON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HIGHWAYS -1997 .................._.n.~.__........................__......u............................................................................................u.n.....................~.........................................................................................................................., [ CIP ~ Project Name ~ 1st ! Total ! Amount i Next ! Revenue! Recommended Programming' ! ~ Project ~ and ~ Year ' Cost ! Completed j 5-Year ! Source L...........,...,.................,.....,..,....,....,......,.,.......,...............,.........1 ~ Number [ Location 1 Pro- i 1994 ! thru 1 Cost' 1 1 1994 ~ 1995 ~ 1996 ! 1997 ! 1998 1 Future i li:~o:m;:~::mmrQr"""~L~Iars::~993'jmm_jmm_mjlm-IL_m[l-j j ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY i ~ j ~ ~ 2204 ~ 21 CSAH - TH36 Project, ~ 1994 50.0 50.0 I UF ~ ~ 50.0 ! ~ 1 ~ 23 Oak Park Heights j j j ~ 2205 CSAH, TH36 to Orleans, 1994 10.0 ! 10,0 UF 10.0 j Oak Park Heights CSAH, TH36 to Orleans, Oak Park Heights j 1 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 1 ~ ~ 1 2207 13 CSAH, CSAH 4 to TH97 1 1994 1400,0 I 1400,0 ! S ~ ! 1400,0 ;.:, 1 ~ ~ (4-1/2 miles), May and ~ ~ \ ~ I 'I New Scandia Townships 1 1.1 . I TRAFFIC SIGNALS I I I ~ ~ CSAH & CR Traffic 1 1997 400.0 1 400.0 I GR/SFIS I ~ 400.0 ! ~ I ! S~pM~. prty.! i-I":," i I. I 1 ~ SAFETYITRAFFIC CAPACITY ~. 1! ~ , ; Mi$ceRaneous Projects ; 1997 80.0 i 80.0 I GR ; . so.o i i I I PRESERVATION & PAVEMENT I r 1 I 1 ~ REHABILITATION ~ ~ 1 I I Overlay 15 miles I 1997 750,0 I 750.0 I GR I 750,0 I I i::,:li2,iff;;;;i;Jgj'~~:i;:::nff:f!:!;;;:;,;;jflif;,&7.3'i,9.;I!;;;;;if:::;1f~Fji;9.:I;i;:;l,;:iil;;:;;;~~1~~.9.~~7.3'i~:!Rt?)t:~g:1 2206 1994 30.0 i ; 30.0 ; UF 30,0; ~ 'DoOars listed in thousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant S = State Grant M = Metropolitan Grant UF = Unfunded B = 1989 Capftal Bonds GR = General Revenue (levy) SF = Special Fund, Local Unft of Government Contribution LP = Lease Purchase - IllwyI1,d11 16 WASHI~TON COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS I HIGHWAYS -1998 e r...'cip'..uT....'..'.....,.u...'p.ioj~'N~~........,.,u._......Tu_....'1';i......rh...T~i~'.....T..uA;;;~~~i....T....N~;t..urR~~;~~~Tuu...........,....u~~;;;;;;~~d.~d.pi~;:;;;;;i;;g~u.............u..uu: l Project ~ and ~ Year Cost I Completed I 5-Year ! Source ! I \::~!_L::___I~;-~-~;:J3;:-1:lmr~:T~-~-r:996Ii~1':F~u~~1 : : Rd. No. Type location : ::: i i ffiGKT$WAY I 'I i ~ ~ CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS j ~ ~ ~ ~ 2038 j 21 CSAHs, Minor Collector, j 1983 955,0 I 955.0 l UF ~ ~ 955.0 ~ ~ ~ 23 tied to possible ~ j j j ~ ~ 28 realignment of TH36 River ~ I I ~ j ~ Crossing, Oak Park . i i i j I i Heights i ,!! ~ i 2034 i 23 CSAH, Collector on i 1981 560,0 ! 560.0 I UF ~ i 560.0 I j ~ Beach & Paris, TH36 to j I ~ ~ j l I Orleans and Right-of- ] I ~ I j j Way, Oak Park Heights j j j j I 2101 i 24 CSAH, Minor Arterial on I 1986 320,0 I 320.0 I UF I I 320.0 I j ~ Osgood (11th St.) ~ \ I j j ~ between TH36 & Orleans j j j ~ i 1 and Right-of-Way, Oak. 1 ~ ~ ~ j ~ Park Heights i ~ ~ ~ I j ;r=~f! 1008 _.01 -01_ UF j I !_nj !j.l TRAFRC SIGNALS i ,i!! , ' j ~ CSAH Traffic Signals per ~ 1998 400,0 I 400,0 I GRlSFIS I 1 ; 1 400,0 ~ I I De~ p~! ' 11~~ I ! I I , j SAFETYfTRAFFIC CAPACITY 1 1 1 j ! PRESERV:=:: i 1008 000 ; 000 I GR i' 000 I j REHABILITATION j j j j i . ~ OVerlay 15 miles j 1998, 750.0 ! ) 75O.0! GR, iI, , 750.0 ~ I 'DaDars listed in thousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant S = State Grant M = Metropolitan Grant B = 1989 Capital Bonds GR = General Revenue (levy) SF = Special Fund, Local Unn 'of Government Contribution LP = Lease Purchase UF = Unfunded 17 [ . l ~ e allwy9l.a.1 e PARKS DEVELOPMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION 1994-1998 ~"""""",__'''_:n...................___................_...n'_''''''.......__.....:....._...n...........,..~.....................n.................__...~......._....._...~.....................,.._............u_..........................................-......................................, ~ CIP i Project Name ; 1st ; Total !. Amount ! Next ! Revenue I Recommended Programming' ' i Project ~ and i Year ! Cost ! Completed I 5-Year ! Source ! ' L~u:L_mm~m_!~;~L~;~:1;;~:_!__[i~Ii~5Ii~6Ii~7I'~I~~:] i 3001 ; Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park i 1982 ! 1543,0 ! 193.0! 648.3 1M! 155.4 j 391.9 j 43.5 I 38,O! 19.5 ' 1 ! Development I'.! 1 ! : I ~ 3002 ~ Lake Elmo Park Reserve ~ 1982 8028,0 1 3558,O! 1683.7! SF 224,2 ~ 526.6 ~ 272,1 ! 405.31 255,5 ; i Development; i i ; ::: : : i 3005 j Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park i 1971 1514,0 984,0 196,0 ! M 196,0 ~ 0.0 ~ O.O! 0,0 ! 0.0 ~ 1 Acquis~ion! ! ! ! ; I, 3006 ! Pine Point Acquis~ion ! 1987 798.0 I 0,0 ! 0.0 ~ GR O,O! 0.0 ! 0,0 i O.O! 0.0 ~ ~ 3007 ~ Square Lake Park Development ~ 1986 262,5 ! 238.0 ! 48,3 I GR 0,0 ~ 7,3 ~ 21.1! 0.3! 19.61 I 3008 I Pine Point Development I 1986 496,1 l 68,O! 329,3 I GR 0.0 I 98.1 I 40.6! 173.71 16.9! j 3009 ~ Square Lake Park Acquis~ion j 1986 361,0 ! 0.0 ! O,O! UF 0,0 ~ 0,0 ~ 0.0 I O.O! 0,0 ~. ~ 3010 1 Big Marine Park Acquis~ion j 1988 14998,0 1 2744.7! 6000.0 1 M 0,0 j 1000.0 12000.0 12000.0 ! 1000.0 1 I 3011 I Big Marine Park Development I 1988 6458.0 I 0.0 ! 0,0 ! M 0.0 I 0.0 I 0,0 i 0,0 I 0,0 I 1 3012 I Point Douglas Park Development I 1991 18,51 0,0 I 27.2! SF I 25.61 0.81 0.0 1 0.81 0.0 1 l 3013 ! Parks Ref.......ioo I 1994 65.01 0.0 ! 75.0 I GR 5.0! 25.0 i 15.0! 15.0! 15.0 I :j0::j::l~11jJiK~:11!AI~~Iii100ji!i::~ii::iii;1;::1:::~;~jl:jtiZ;~jjti~1<i!'i~:jJit{tiil11~~~~1{_~~im~~j~Q~?:il .DoBars listed in thousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant B = 1989 Capital Bonds S = State Grant GR = General Revenue (levy) M = Metropolitan Grant SF = Special Fund, Local Un~ of Government Contribution UF = Unfunded LP = Lease PurChaSe e 1l**'""I<IIl 18 SPECIAL PROJECTSfTECHNOLOGY 1994-1998 e i I 'u..........................................,...,.......................,....,.............,.....,....,.1..........,..................,...................,..........,............,...........,...........,......,......................,...........................,...................,.....'.......,"'.. ~ crp ~ Project Name ~ 1st i Total I Amount 1 Next I Revenue i Recommended Programming' I ~ Project ~ and ! Year Cost 1 Completed IS-Year; Source I I j Number j Location j Pro- 1994 [ thru I Cost' ! r..'1'994'..r..1995..T..1996..'[..'199fr'1998...r.F'~'~i~..'l L..,..............1............................................,......................I...~~,~~......L...~~~~~~,...L....,~~,~~.......L...............L...............J...............1...............1...............1...............L............1................J j 4011 j Accelerated Completion of j 1985 I 361.0 I 134.5; 226.5 l B I 113,5! 113.0 j l ; j ; ! I Automated Land Information System !! ! ~ ! I' I ; 4012 j Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal ~ 1993 71.0 ! 40.0 I 31.0 I B 31.0 ~ ~ ~ I - I :=WI I 1994 78.0 i 780 I B 780 I J I I 4025 1 Revamp Cost Accounting System 1 1992 80,0 i 80.0 I GR 1 80.0 I I I 4029 I Revamp General Ledger System I 1992 100.0 i 1oo.0! GR 1100.0 I I j 4030 j Aerial Photography j 1993 40.0 40,0 1 GR ~ j 40.0 i ~ i 4031 j G.I.S, Applications (Health, i 1994 40.4 40,4 l GRIB 40,4 ~ i i ~ j Environment and Land! 17/23,4 1 ~ j i i ManagemenllPublic WorkslAudb i i i i j j Treasurer) j j! j J 4032 ! I.S, Technology Equ~ment ! 1994 106.5 i 106,5 i B 106,5 I I I ! 4033 I Global Posnioning Survey Equ~ment I 1994 50,0 [ 50,0 i UF I 50.0 I ! I 4034 1 TriMin Software w~h Imaging J 1994 11.9 ! 11.9 i GR i 11.91 ! . IL0@[;;@BI;illi&2122:;;;B@I21~;j22;jjTi!f![J0!0f!!Ji;;i::fj2fill~~;l;iJj;B@P~f?~~j~!jjG;~L~~!;li0~J't~g;t![!j~~fD~RII;j!;;i;!I?;b~ 'Donars listed in thousands Funding Key: F = Federal Grant S = State Grant M = Metropolnan Grant B = 1989 capnal Bonds GR = General E1eveilue (levy) SF = Special Fund, Local Unk of . Government Contribution LP = Lease Purchase UF = Unfunded 19 e ..".c:p'~ e e e EQUIPMENT. FURNISHINGS AND INFORMATION SERVICES 1994-1998 N o CIP Next Recommended Programming. . Projed Service 5- Y ear Funding Number Number Department Cost. Source 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Future 5000 1005 Accounting 2,5 GR 2,5 1010 Administration 8.5 GR 8,5 1012 1020 Assessor 33,2 GR 0,0 14,6 18.6 1030 Attorney 2.2 GR 2,2 1035 1040 Auditor-Treasurer 390,5 GR 15,5 130,0 35,0 210.0 1042 1044 1047 1150 Central Services 447,0 GR 15.0 115,0 127.0 40,0 150.0 1303 Community Services 41.9 GR 34.1 2,8 5,0 1312 1318 1350 1707 1709 1760 1170 Court Administration 63,4 GR 5.0 18,0 20,2 20,2 1172 1942 Court Services " 170,0 GR 20,0 50,0 50.0 50,0 . 1947 1952 1955 1960 1015 Human Resources 5.0 GR 3,0 2.0 1755 1280 IS 757.9 GR 177.9 160,0 210.0 210,0 EQUIPMENT, FURNISHINGS AND INFORMATION SERVICES 1994-1998 CIP Next Recommended Programming" i Projea Service 5- Y ear Funding Number Number Department Cost" Source 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Future 1282 2110 Library 20,0 GR 20,0 1210 Minnesota Extension 1,5 GR 1.5 1570 Heahh, Environment, Land Management 41.3 GR 41.3 1580 1~~ .-- --.-.- 1584 1586 1590 1591 1593 N 1595 ..... 1601 Public Works 1110 Facil~ies 202.0 GR 42,0 40,0 40.0 40.0 40.0 2260 Parks 245,5, GR 27,0 92.0 63,0 43.5 20,0 2261 1240 Road & Bridge 2514,4 GR 343,4 656,0 576,0 '481,0 458.0 1244 1248 1250 .. 1650 Recorder 0,0 GR 0.0 1660 Sheriff 105,0 GR 105.0 1663 1665 1668 1740 Survevor 140,5 GR 42,0 58,5 40,0 5,192.30 905.90 1,336,90 1,181.80 1,099.70 668,00 0.00 " Dollars listed in thousands, Funding Key: GR - General Revenue Fund e e ~ e .'oqlip.d11 -e, 1994-1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS PUBLIC FACILITIES This category includes the construction or expansion of county buildings used for offices and operations. The parks system structures are included separately in the 3000 number series. The operating costs of existing facilities is approximately $4.00 to $12.00 per square foot. The 1992 operating costs were approximately $2,843,800. Operating costs shown for proposed projects will be for that project only and will be in addition to the overall operating costs. The estimated project costs include costs of planning, construction, furnishings and fixtures, and contingency. e The public facilities identified below are needed to serve the citizens of Washington County. Review of possibilities to share these facilities with other governmental units is constantly occurring. The county presently has several joint facilities and expects to do more in the future. To avoid duplication, regional type facilities have been studied. For the most part, difference of needs, distance, schec;iuling, and financing difficulties have hindered regional cooperation. At this time, the County Board has determined that the facilities listed below will serve Washington County's needs and no additional space has been provided for shared facilities. 1000 Physical Plant Projects Countywide Proiect Description To cover the costs of the west end heating and ventilation study and implementation; potential reconstruction of the old jail space, based on the Space Study Committee's recommendations; and other projects that would extend the useful life of the physical plant. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction/Implementation Date Estimated Annual Operating Cost $300,000 1994 N/A e 22 Need for Improvementl e To extend the usefulli e of the physical plant Likel Demand for 1m rovement 1025 Auditorffreasurer, A ssor & Recorder - Addition Stillwater Proiect Description The long range planni g goal for these offices is to provide contiguous office space with more efficient acc ss between floors. Estimated Project Cost Estimated Construction Date: Estimated Annual Ope ating Cost: $1,185,000 1996 $34,000 Need For 1m rovemen A draft space study pr pared in 1987 - 88 projected a need of approximately 8000 sq. ft. for the west wing 0 the government center. tit Likel Demand For 1m rovement Population growth will require expanded county selVices and increased employees. The space study identi es the need for these facilities by 1993. 1028 Library, Valley Bran - Site Purchase, 1.5 Acres Proiect Description Investigate, select and urchase land on which to construct a building. $206,000 After 1998 , Estimated Acquisition Estimated Acquisition e 23 e e e Need For Improvement See C.LP. #1033. Currently, this library'is loca.ted inientedspa.cem the Lakdarid . Plaza shopping center. The space is poorly maintained and is too small to provide services to meet present use. Per capita use of this library is the highest in the county. Likelv Demand For Improvement Population growth will continue and demand for more services and larger space will increase. The Library Board is looking for improved rental space to use for the next several years while a permanent facility in the area is evaluated. 1031 Underground Storage Tanks ReplacementslUpgrade (9 Tanks) Countywide Proiect Description Phased replacements through 1994, install leak detectors by 1998. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementation Date: $53,300 1994 Need For Improvement The county stores gasolme, diesel fuel, heatmg oil and waste oil in tanks at the Public Works garages, at the Government Center and the south shop. The steel tanks requiring replacement, range in age from 17 to 28 years. State law requires leak detection devices to be mstalled by 1991 and corrosion, spill and overfill protection to be provided by 1998. .. Likelv Demand for Improvement Required by law. 1032 Government Center Remodeling Stillwater Proiect DescriPtion Estimated Project Costs: Community Services Work Team Area 10,000 24 Estimated Construction IDate: Estimated Operating cqst: i 1994 N/A e Need For Improvement The projects indicated e for necessary maintenance and reconfiguration of space to meet tenants' operating needs: Likel Demand For 1m rovement Department heads have requested the remodeling to accommodate department needs. 1033 Library, Oak dale Bra ch Oakdale Proiect Description The Library Board reco ends that an expandable facility of 10,000 square feet be built as soon as possibl . A large enough site should be selected so that the facility can be doubled in size ithin 15 years. Expansion plans should be determined after Oakdale and Lake Elm complete development plans for the service area. $1,550,000 1995 e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction ate: Estimated Annual Oper ting Cost: Need For Improvement The Library Board has tudied library use and population growth .patterns for the past several years and has d veloped a Facilities Plan which includes guidelines on when and where to locate libr facilities. The Plan sets out the fo lowing goals for county library facilities: A. Provide facilities where population clusters and/or commercial centers exist of sufficient size to ensure good levels of use and economical operation. B. Provide a library facility within 3 miles of 80% of county residents and within 6 miles of 90% f county residents. C. Ensure that total facilities space and individual facilities meet guidelines for size and location e 25 e There is currently no library facility serving the Oakdale area. A library to serve these people should be located near the intersection of Interstate. 694 and County Highway 10. A site search for3 to 5 acres is under way. This amount of land will be needed to expand the building in the future to meet the needs of the growing population expected to be served. Likely Demand For Improvement Oakdale population is growing rapidly, especially in southern Oakdale. A library located near the intersection of Interstate 694 and County Highway 10 would serve people living in southern Oakdale and in western and southern parts of Lake Elmo. The population to be served by this facility could be as high as 25,000 people by the year 2000. The Oakdale population south of State Highway 5 could grow from the present 11,000 to 15,000 by the year 2000. Depending on decisions regarding development policy, the Lake Elmo population to be served by this facility could be as high as 5,000 to 10,000 people by the year 2000. Most of the people living in the northern part of this city live within the service area of the North St. Paul branch library of Ramsey County. 1036 Library, Woodbury Branch Expansion Woodbury e Proiect Description Expand present library by 10,000 square feet for a total library size of 30,000 square feet. A single bay expansion would increase the public space from 13,000 square feet to 23,000 square feet. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: Estimated Annual Operating Cost: $1,000,000 After 1998 Need for Improvement See c.I.P. #1033. The present building was designed in 1983 but not constructed until 1986-1987. It was designed and built for the 1988 population with the expectations of expanding as the population grew. Use of the library has increased 300% since 1986 and is highest of all county libraries. More space is badly needed to house increased materials, provide more seating and better meet the community's needs. Insufficient parking is a severe problem. e 26 Likelv Demand for Im~rovement I e Space will be used to ijouse more materials, provide more seating arid better meet the needs of the communitl. Parking is also a problem. 1039 Bring Buildings Into DA Compliance County Wide Proiect Description Bringing structures int compliance will involve work on parking lots, rest rooms, stairways, offices, libr space, lunch rooms and vending areas. Estimated Project Cost Estimated Constructio Date: Estimated Annual Ope ation Cost: Need For 1m rovemen County buildings have to comply with ADA requirements. Likel Demand For I rovement Disabled people wor . g or visiting the county buildings. 1048 Historic Courthouse estoration Projects Stillwater Proiect Description Continuation of the re toration project is made possible by private fund drives. 1994 Exterior tuck-pointing Replace Exhaust Fan 1995-1998 Repair dome capitals Replace' water main d masonry repair d columns d plumb for sprinkler system 27 $129,900 1994 N/A e $30,000 $3,000 $18,000 $45,000 e e e e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: Estimated Operating Cost: $96,000 1994-1996 $60,000IYear Need For Improvement The structure requires constant care to preserve the exterior and interior. First priority is to protect and rehabilitate. Second priority is to restore to original condition. An annual effort to achieve the first priority is necessary. Projects to correct deteriorating elements of the structure have been proposed in an overall plan. The exhaust fan will improve the air quality in the basement making it more suitable for storage. Tuck pointing and masonry work is needed to avoid leaking or major cracking that would require major repairs. The original columns were removed during 1990 repairs. They are part of the decorative historic facade and need to be replaced. The current water main is too small to service a sprinkler system. Likelv Demand For Improvement The Historic Courthouse is listed as a National Historic Building. Continued' maintenance and enhancement of the structure is needed to attract events. The county's goal is to increase self-sufficiency through increased rental income. Restoration projects are a method of accomplishing this objective. 1051 Light Fixture - North Shop Stillwater Township Proiect Description Redo lights in the Public Works North Shop (fleet manager .and highway superintendent's offices, lunchroom, hallways). Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $8,000 1994 Need for Improvement Many fixtures are in violation of OSHA regulations because they do not have protective lens covers. Replacement lens covers will need to be custom made to fit the 20-year old fixtures. 28 Likelv Demand for Imrrovement Public Works employ s. 1052 Parking Lot Overlay - North Shop Stillwater Township Proiect Description Overlay the northeast ublic parking lot. Estimated Project Cost Estimated Constructio Date: Need for Improvement $25,000 ,1994 The parking lot will w rsen if the overlaying project is postponed. The lot soon will worsen to the point of eeding major reconstruction. Likel Demand for 1m rovement The existing parking I t presents a poor public image. 1053 Automatic Door Ope er - North Entrance Government Center Stillwater Proiect Description Install automatic door pener to the north entrance doors of the Government Center to ease entry for disabled individuals. . Estimated Project Cost. Estimate Construction Need for Improvement $5,500 1994 The north entrance is h avily used by the public, including some individuals who are wheelchair bound or us walking aides. 29 e e e ,-- e e Likelv Demand for Improvement Existing. automatic door opener at the south entrance is heavily used. Heavy use is anticipated when the door opener is installed at the north entrance. 1054 Public Works Remodeling Stillwater Township Proiect Description Install modular furniture in engineering area. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: Need for Improvement Needed to begin full development of work teams and automated design area. Likelv Demand for Improvement Staff working in teams. 1055 Old Jail Remodeling, Government Center Stillwater Proiect DescriPtion Demolish old jail, install sprinkler system, and construct new office space. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: r Need for Improvement $70,300 1994 $200,000 1994 Many departments in the Government Center are cramped for space. The County's Space Planning Committee is evaluating the possible uses of that space. Decisions about the future use of the space will be made after the committee makes its recommendations. 30 Likel Demand for 1m rovement '" A variety of uses have been suggested including a'iunnel to the parking lot, expanded employee cafeteria, an Court Administration offices. 1056 Court Modifications Proiect Description A variety of modificati nsto the Courts area are needed. These will include converting a jury asse bly room to a courtroom, remodeling a jury assembly room with provisions for au . o/visual, constructing a judge chamber, remodeling the County Board Room for perio ic use as a courtroom, providing space for court reporters and victim witnesses, and r modeling to comply with ADA requirements. Estimated Project Cost. Estimated Construction Date: Need.for Improvement $908,500 1994 Current space is too s all and has not been modified to meet ADA requirements. Likel Demand for 1m rovement Judges, jurors, and oth rs involved with court business. 1057 Parking Ramp Snow ate Government Center, S . lwater Proiect Description Install another snow ga e in the parking ramp. Estimated Project Cost: Estimate Construction ate: $8,000 1995 31 e e e e Need for Improvement Existing snow gates dump the snow near the fire exit doors, blocking them until staff clear the doorway. Another gate would reduce staff time now needed to clear the 2 areas. Likelv Demand for Improvement Employee's safety. e e 32 e e e HIGHWAY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION , ~ This category includes the construction, reconstruction or preservation of the c'otiritY's~ 302-mile highway system. Of the 302 miles, 203 miles are county-state-aid-highways and 99 miles are county highways. Need For And Demand For Improvement The highway construction and reconstruction projects are scheduled to provide increased safety (S), traffic capacity (T) and pavement strength (P). (These symbols, listed with each project, denote the type of project) The preservation projects are scheduled to interrupt the normal deterioration of highways in order to extend the life of the highway and postpone costly reconstruction. The operating cost of a highway system is influenced by the level of maintenance services provided. The usual method of measurement for maintenance is cost per mile. In 1992 the average cost per mile for highway maintenance was $9,100. The capital improvement projects listed below will not substantially decrease the overall maintenance (operating) costs. Therefore, individual project operating costs are not indicated. 2000 Miscellaneous Highway Projects Countywide Proiect DescriPtion To cover costs of unforeseen minor highway reconstruction and overlay needs. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $250,000 1994 2034 CSAH 23, Right-of-Way Purchase and Reconstruction On Beach & Paris, TH 36 to Orleans Oak Park Heights Proiect Description (S, P) This is the final segment of the CSAH 23 corridor between TH 36 and downtown ,Stillwater. Complete reconstruction of the two-lane street includes storm sewer and curb and gutter which do not now exist. 33 Estimated Acquisition ~ost: Estimated Acquisition Ipate: Estimated Project Cost: . Estimated Construction Date: $ 10,000 1998 $550,000 1998 e 2038 CSAH(S) 21, 23, 28; robable Realignments Oak Park Heights Project Description (S, Construction of the Stil water/Houlton Bridge on the south alignment will affect these county-state-aid-highw s. The county will have the responsibility and financial obligations to rebuild ese roadways as part of the overall bridge project. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $955,000 .1998 2049 CSAH 21, Right-of- W y Purchase and Reconstruction CSAH 14 to CSAH 28, Oak Park Heights, Bayport Project Description (S, e This project is the last egment of the corridor reconstruction between 1-94 and Oak Park Heights. Drainag and site distance will be improved. Estimated Acquisition Estimated Acquisition Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction ate: $25,000 1994 $530,000 1994 2100 CSAH 13, Reconstruct on One Mile North of CR 0 to CSAH 6, Lake ~lmo Proiect Description (S, ) New construction of thi segment is proposed. The work will involve increased width, improved drainage, corr cted curves and reconstructed pavement. e 34 e e e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $470,000 1994 2101 CSAH 24, Right-of-Way Purchase and Reconstruction.. Osgood (4th Street) Between T.H. 36 and Orleans, Oak Park Heights and Stillwater Proiect Description (S, P) This project will provide a new pavement surface, additional storm sewer inlets, and concrete curb and gutter. The project will be coordinated with CIP 2052, 2053 and 2053A. Estimated Acquisition Cost: Estimated Acquisition Date: Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $ 30,000 1998 $290,000 1998 2102 CSAH 27, Right-or-Way Purchase and Reconstruction T.H. 244 to I Mile North of T.H. 244 Mahtomedi, White Bear Lake, Birchwood, and Ramsey County Proiect Description (S, T, P) Reconstruction of the route on the west county line is proposed. This project will involve five governmental units. It is anticipated that Ramsey County will cooperatively share in the construction costs. The project will involve grading, improved drainage, curb and gutter, and reconstructed pavement. Estimated Acquisition Cost: Estimated Acquisition Date: Estimated Project Cost: (Washington County's one-half share with Ramsey County) Estimated Construction Date: $ 10,000 1994 $250,000 1994 35 2106 CSAH 5, Traffic Si~als, Right-of-Way Purchase and Reconstruction T.H. 36 to Croixwood IBoulevard, Stillwater Project Description (S, T, P) e Improvements to this s gment of roadway is anticipated due to the shopping mall development in the no heast quadrant of T.H. 36 and CSAH 5. This project will include constructing fo r lanes and installing traffic signals to provide additional capacity for expected i creased traffic. $30,000 1994 $1,800,000 1994 Estimated Acquisition Estimated Acquisition Estimated Project Cost Estimated Constructio Date: 2114 CR 52, Reconstructio CSAH 3 to TH95, Ne Scandia Proiect Description Reconstruction of this oadway segment is proposed. The project will include widened roadway, improved dr nage, corrected curves, backsloping and new pavement. e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $975,000 1994 2130 CSAH 3, Right-of-Wa & Improvements TH97 to 1/4 mile sou of North County Line, May and New Sc~dia Townships Project Description (S, $100,000 1995 $1,040,000 1996 This project will provi e a wider surface and improve vertical and horizontal sight distance. Estimated Acquisition Estimated Acquisition Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: e 36 As part of development along the CSAH 16 (Valley Creek Road) corridor, traffic flow and capacity will have to be addressed through median construction. This project will involve median work from Interlachen Drive to Woodbury Drive. Access agreements with the City of Woodbury will insure proper spacing between intersections along this roadway segment. Estimated Acquisition Cost: Estimated Construction Date: Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $50,000 1995 $1,300,000 1996 2183 CSAH 10, Traffic Signal Helmo Ave., Lake Elmo Proiect Description e Increased traffic volumes, due to widening CSAH 10 to a 4-lane will necessitate a traffic signal at Helmo Ave. A new mall is planned for this intersection. Increased traffic control will be needed to provide adequate capacity and safety. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $100,000 1994 2191 CSAH 14, Resurfacing and Improvement CSAH 15 to CSAH 21, Bay town Proiect Description (S,P) Bituminous overlay and bituminous shouldering to be completed. A safety improvement will be made to the curve on the N.E. corner of CR 8A, Section 9. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Completion Date: $300,000 1995 e 37 2192 CSAH 19, Traffic Signal Construction Ramp at 194, Woodbllry I Project Description ( ,T) e This is a joint constru tion effort with MNIDOT for traffic control at the freeway access point. $100,000 1994 Estimated Project Cost Estimated Completion 2193 CSAH 19, Traffic Si Hudson Road, W oodb al Construction This is a safety contro needed because of the increased traffic flow on the south frontage road at CSA 19 and 194.' Estimated Project Cost Estimated Completion $100,000 1994 2194 CSAH 22, Traffic Sig al Construction TH61, Newport e Project Description (S T) This is a safety control needed because of increased traffic. Estimated Project Cost Estimate Completion ate: $100,000 1994 2195 CSAH 16, Traffic Si al Construction Tower Drive, Woodbu Project Description (S ) This is a safety control needed because of increased traffic. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Completion ate $100,000 1994 e 38 e e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $100,000 1994 2197 CSAHs, Overlay S 1. Paul Park Proiect Description (P) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $50,000 1994 2198 CR 55, Overlay CR 61 toCSAH 7, Stillwater and May Townships Proiect Description (P) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $115,000 1994 2199 CSAH 21, Overlay TH 95 to S. Frontage Road, Afton Proiect Description (P) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $110,000 1994 2200 CR 68, Overlay CSAH 15 to CSAH 9, Grant Township Proiect Description (P) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $65,000 1994 39 I 2201 CR 15A, Dip Correcti n New Scandia Townshi Project Description (S Estimated Project. Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $100,000 1994 2202 CSAH 16, Right-of- W y Purchase Interlachen to CSAH 1 , Woodbury Project Description (T) Purchase of right-of-wa is necessary before reconstructing this roadway, segment. Proposed right-of-way idth will accommodate a four-lane roadway. Estimated Acquisition ost: Estimated Acquisition ~ate: $50,000 1994 2203 CSAH 13, Right-of-W y Purchase and Reconstruction CSAH 6 to 1 Mile Sout , Lake Elmo Project. Descril>tion (T) Estimated Acquisition ost: Estimated Acquisition ate: Estimated Construction ost: Estimated Construction ate: $15,000 1994 $470,000 1994 2204 CSAH 21, 23, 28, Righ -of-Way Purchase TH 36 Project, Oak Par Heights Proiect Description (S, $50,000 1997 Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction ate: 40 e e e e e Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: 2206 CSAH 24 TH 36 to Orleans, Oak Park Heights Project Description (T) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Project Date: 2207 CSAH 3, CSAH 4 to TH 97 May and New Scandia Townships Project Description (S,P) $10,000 1997 $30,000 1997 This project will provide a wider surface and improve vertical and horizontal sight distance. Estimated Acquisition Cost: Estimated Acquisition Date: Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: 2208 Curb Cuts, ADA Compliance County-wide Project Description (S) Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Construction Date: $100,000 1996 $1,400,000 1997 $100,000 1994 41 -- e e PARKS DEVELOPMENT AND LAND ACQUISITION Need for and Demand for Improvement On July 29, 1986 the Washington County Board of Commissioners adopted the Washington County Recreation/Open Space System Plan. The system plan analyzed the county to determine acquisition and development needs for recreation and open space sites. As the implementing agency for the Metropolitan, Council, the county receives acquisition and development dollars from the Council. Before receiving funding from the Council, the county is required to have an approved master plan for each park site. Each master plan identifies land acquisition and development needs. All projects recommended for the CIP have involved public review at a public hearing, and review and approval by the Washington County Park and Open Space Commission and the Washington County Board of Commissioners. Based upon Metropolitan Council estimates, Washington County park use has grown eightfold in the last five years. Also, user studies have helped to determine public needs and demands for park development. Without continued development, existing facilities could not meet public demand. Overcrowding of existing facilities will have a negative impact on the resource and reduce personal opportunities. Washington County's operation and maintenance expense for 1993 was $700,800. There were no levy dollars budteted. The development proposed over. the next five years will increase the operation and maintenance costs. Yet, based upon present population trends the per capita cost will remain fairly stable. 3001 Cottage Grove Ravine - Development Cottage Grove Proiect Description 1994 Entry road, turn lanes, parking, gate, entry sign, site development, trailhead with kiosk, overlook, reforestation, prairie reconstruction, boundary fencing Estimated Cost: $155,400 42 1995 Picnic shelter, t ilet building, well, electrical, site development - Estimated Cost: $391,900 1996 Play structure, ite development, trail, reforestation Estimated Cost: $43,500 1997 Trails, bound fencing Estimated Cost: $38,000 1998 Reforestation, p airie restoration Estimated Cost:' $19,500 $648,300 3002 Lake Elmo Park Re rye - Development Lake Elmo 1994 Trails, trail shel er, group camping, council ring, toilet building, picnic areas, tables and grills~ sign age utility services, water well, reforestation e Estimated Cost: $224,220 1995 Prairie ~estorati n, group picnic shelter, site furnishings, toilet buildings, tables and grills, road and parking lots, signage, utility services, wells, reforestation, Estimated Cost: $526,600 1996 Trails, shelters, lshing pier, picnic areas, prairie restoration, wetland rehabilitation, r: forestation Estimated Cost: $272, 100 1997 Environmental' ucation building, roads and parking lots, trails, lighting, utility services and rei ation Estimated Cost: $405,300 e 43 e e e 1998 Picnic shelter, site furnishings, interpretive blinds, observation deck, observation tower, fencing Estimated Cost: $255,500 TOTAL PROJECf COST: $1,683,700 3005 Cottage Grove Ravine - Acquisition Cottage Grove Proiect Description 1994 Purchase 56 acres Estimated Cost: $196,000 1995 - 1998 No projects scheduled. Estimated Cost: $ -0- TOTAL PROJECf COST: $196,000 3006 Pine Point Park .; Acquisition Stillwater Township Proiect Description 1994 - 1998 No projects scheduled. Estimated Cost: $ -0- TOTAL PROJECf COST: $ -0- 3007 Square Lake - Development May Township Proiect DescriPtion 1994 No project scheduled Estimated Cost: $ -0- 44 Bituminous wr. way Estimated Cost. . $7,300 1995 1996 Fishing pier Estimated 'Cost 1997 Horseshoe pits - $21,100 Estimated Cost $300 1998 Play structure I Estimated Costl TOTAL PROJECf CqST: $19,600 $48,600 3008 Pine Point Park - De elopment Stillwater Township Proiect Description I 1994 No projects schl uled Estimated Cost: e $ -0- 1995 Electrical servi e, well, viewing blind, trail, passing lane, security gate Estimated Cost: $98,100 1996 Site developme t, picnic area, viewing blind, trail Estimated Cost: $40,600 1997 Shelter, comfo station, reforestation Estimated Cost: $173,700 e 45 e e e 1998 Viewing blind Estimated Cost: $16,900 TOTAL PROJECf COST: $329,300 3009 Square Lake . Acquisition May Township Project Description 1994 - 1998 No projects scheduled. ' Estimated Cost: $ -0- 3010 Big Marine Park. Acquisition Project Description 1994 - 1998 Purchase property from willing sellers. Estimated Cost in 1994: Estimated Cost in 1995 Estimated Cost in 1996: Estimated Cost in 1997: Estimated Cost in 1998: TOTAL PROJECf COST: 3011 Big Marine Park . Development Proiect DescriPtion , 1994 - 1998 No projects scheduled. Estimated Cost: $ -0- TOTAL PROJECf COST: $ -0- $ -0- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 46 3013 Parks Reforestation Countywide Very little of the origi al vegetation which once covered Washington County parks areas remains today. ast cultural and fanning practices eliminated much of the tree cover in favor of open leld fanning. As part of Washington County Parks stewardship responsibil ty, the reforestating of these lands to create habitat and a park- like atmosphere is a fo emost objective. Project Description 1994 Estimated Cost: 1995 Estimated Cost: $5,000 $25,000 e 47 e 1996 Estimated Cost: 1997 Estimated Cost: 1998 Estimated Cost:. $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 TOTALPROJECf COST: $75,000 e e 48 e e e SPECIAL PROJECTS .4011 Accelerated Completion of Automated Land Information System Government Center, Stillwater Proiect Description In January 1989, the County Board approved purchase of computer hardware and software to develop a geographic information system referred to as AL.I.S. (Automated Land Information System). The initial step in building AL.I.S. is to develop a parcel-based base map. Over the past 2 1/2 years, the county has invested $500,000 in hardware, software, training, staffing, and maintenance. About two full- time equivalents annually are committed to this project. Over the next three year, an additional four full-time equivalents will be added to complete the base map in three years. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementation Date: $361,000 1993-1995 Need for Improvement At the current staffing levels, it is doubtful that the county will ever complete the base map. Until the base map is complete county wide, the full potential of the system will , not be realized. The sooner the county completes the system, the sooner it will begin maximizing the benefits. After completing a cost/benefit evaluation of accelerating completion of AL.I.S., the C.E.O. Commission's Physical Development Subcommittee concluded that for every year the system goes uncompleted, the county forgoes over $100,000 potential revenue and savings. Likelv Demand for Improvement Anyone who creates maps or does spatial analysis of data. Most likely users are county staff, other governmental units, local utility companies, realtors, etc. Both hard copy maps and the electronic data will be for sale. 49 4012 Computer Assisted ass Appraisal System (CAMA) Government Center, S 'llwater e Project Description This project involves onversion of all paper field rec.ords to an electronic format on a personal computer net ork. The. software has the ability to value all property using advanced statistical te hniques. 10,000 parcels have been entered. 6,000 parcels remain to be entered. Estimated Project Cos : Estimated 1mplementa ion Date: $71,000 1993-1994 Need for 1m rovemen The Assessor's Office 's required to value 70,000 parcels on an annual basis and physically inspect eac parcel every four years. Complete implementation of the CAMA system would: ore equitable assessment and fairer tax burden distribution eliminat need for manual data entry saving $3,500 annually perform stratified sales ratio studies required by the State eliminat repetitive manual calculations e Likel Demand for 1m rovement Twenty-three cities. assessors. irty-four local Boards of Review. Tax Court Contract 4022 Voice Mail with Auto Attendant Government Center, St llwater Project Description Install a new voice m I system that functions with an auto attendant system. Estimated Project Cost Estimated Implementa90n Date: $78,000 1994 e 50 .~_.- e e Need for Improvement The present voice mail system is five years old and cannot interact with an auto attendant system. The C.E.O. Commission recommended that the County install an automated calling system to improve customer relations. This system will automatically answer commonly asked questions in various departments. Considerable staff time can be saved at certain times of the year. Likelv Demand for Improvement All departments. The Finance and Taxation departments would benefit considerably at tax time. 4025 Revamp Cost-Accounting System Government Center, Stillwater Proiect Description Study cost-accounting system needs and acquire new cost-accounting system if the study indicates it is necessary. If necessary, it may be useful to have individual departmental systems versus a central cost-accounting system like we currently have. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementation Date: Estimated Annual Operating Cost: $80,000 1995 $ 5,000 Need For Improvement A few departments have expressed a desire to have a different cos~-accounting system. . The County would have to maintain current system or modify it with current resources. Likelv Demand For Improvement Managers and supervisors of county departments. 51 4029 e To accomplish major r programming of general ledger system or acquire a new general ledger system oftware. Estimated Project Cost Estimated Implementa . on Date: Estimated Annual Ope ating Cost: $100,000 1995 $5,000 Need For 1m rovemen The rule promulgating authority, Governmental Accounting Standards Board, has projected a date for a ajor release of new governmental accounting standards that will be effective July 15, 1995. If the general ledger system is detennined to not meet those standards, the co nty will need to acquire one that does. If not, major reprogramming will be needed to interface with new features of APO system. Without the upgrade, the coun could be out of compliance with the "Measurement Focus Basis of Accounting" s andards and won't be able to use all APO enhancements. Likel Demand For I rovement e Office managers and b dget officers. 4030 Aerial Photography Government Center, S Proiect Description Renewal of county wid aerial photograph coverage; Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementat' on Date: $40,000 1996 Need For Improvement Present aerial photogra hs were taken in 1991. With rapid development in Washington County, th se aerials will soon become obsolete. e 52 e e It Likely Demand For Improvement The aerial photographs are used daily by the Surveyor's Office for surveying, mapping and many geographic information related purposes. They are also used by attorneys, realtors, private land surveyors, planners, engineers, other government agencies and the general public. Revenue from the sale of aerial photographs during 1991 amounted to $8,938. 4031 G.I.S. Application - Work Stations Government Center, Stillwater Proiect Description Install GJ.S. work stations in a variety of departments to assist with OJ.S. mapping and applications. Estimated Project Cost (1994): Estimated Implementation Date: $40,400 On-going Need for Improvement Many departments currently produce maps by hand. This technique is laborious, inefficient, and results in long intervals between map updates. Use of an automated mapping system would free staff time for other things. More efficient mapping would allow the departments to clean up the back log of mapping projects. As the Surveyor's Office completes the GJ.S. base map, other departments can begin overlaying other map layers for analytical work. These work stations are needed to make full use of the GJ.S. Likely Demand for Improvement The Public Works, Planning, Health, Environment and Land Management Departments and the Auditorffreasurer's Office have immediate needs for the system. 4032 I.S. Technology Equipment Government Center, Stillwater Proiect Description Introduce and implement new technology - specifics not yet determined. 53 Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementa" on Date: $106,500 1994 e This would allow Info ation Services to follow the recommendations of the County's Infonnation Technolo y Advisory Committee. This committee is recommending new technology that would help the County better serve its customers. New technology is ex ected. but is difficult to identify 1-2 years in advance. This money will allow the ounty to meet the demands as they occur. 4033 Global Positioning S rvey Equipment Government Center, S 'llwater Proiect Description t Utilizing 3 Trimble 40 0 SE Upgradable Static Satellite Receivers for determiniog geographic positions 0 USPLS comers to create a Survey Control Network in our 9 remaining townships. jrhe geographic positions are determined by gathering data e received from orbiting atellites and achieving millimeter accuracies. The positions gathered. by GPS are a ~usted. and then converted to the North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) and transferr to our G.I.S. data base. This Survey Control Network is the basis for all surveying, mapping, and land information activities. This technology will also provide vertical d turn. Estimated Project Cost. Estimated Implementa on Date: $50,000 1995 Need for Improvement The County has compl ted 3 of 12 townships using present surveying methods. A township can be compl ted. in about 5 months, using current methods. An estimated 45% of the labor cost an be saved using GPS technology. GPS technology will greatl y increase produc ivity in. all facets of field survey projects. e 54 e e e Likelv Demand for Improvement GPS will be a very useful and productive tool fortIie~Coiinty Surveyor'sOffice,-as well as the Public Works Department. 4034 Tri Min Software with Imaging Government Center, Stillwater Proiect Description Software to be used for vital statistics, including birth and death certificates and marriage documents. Estimated Project Cost: Estimated Implementation Date: $11,900 1995 Need for Improvement, Washington County has automated vital records for most functions. This software would automate the rest of the functions, as well as provide summary information and statistics. Example of time savings: marriage licenses would be automatically printed rather than typed. Likelv Demand for Improvement Customers will be served more quickly. 55 e EQUIPMENT. FURNISHINGS AND INFORMATION SERVICES Proiect Description This category iricludes, replacement capital items used for the county operations. In some cases, anticipated personnel increases are reflected in increased capital ' equipment needs for the new personnel. The major cost items are listed below. Assessor 1994-1996 1993-1997 Computer Video Enhancement for CAMA System $44,000 $24,000 Auditor-Treasurer 1994 License Bureau's State Hook Up $7,500 1995 AT PC Networking $25,000 Remodel Vault Safe $50,000 Vault Safe Alarm System $50,000 1996 Thermo Bond $25,000 1997 Tax Computer $200,000 e Central Services 1994 Replacement Phones $15,000 1995 Telephone Upgrade $100,000 1996 Copy/Duplication Upgrade $100,000 Community Services "'.... 1994 Medicaid Management Information System $25,300 Court Services 1994 Van - Sentence-to-Service $20,000 1995-1997 Vehicle Replacements $200,000 e 56 Health, Environment and Land Management e 1994 omputer Network - Solid/Hazardous $19,000 aste Information Services 1994 uford - 32 Mg Memory $23,000 - 3.4 GB Disks $78,000 iber Equipment $20,000 ilverrun Software $15,000 1995 osk Equipment $150,000 tical Disk $50,000 1996-1997 ew Technology $300,000 Public Works - Faciliti s 1994 oft -A-Cool Machine $6,000 amp Sweeper $17,000 ickup Replacement Unit $15,000 I e Maker $4,000 I I Public Works-Parks e 1994 ase Radio $2,500 1 Ton Dump Truck $24,500 1995 $13,000 $25,000 ., $30,000 $15,000 1996 I Ton Dump Truck $22,000 ctorlLoader $30,000 7 " Mower $11,000 1997 $14,000 $16,000 $11,000 1998 1 Ton Dump Truck $20,000 e 57 e Public Works - Road and Bridge 1994 2 Dump Trucks I Loader 4WD 3 Pickup Trucks 2 Tar Kettles OJ.S. Work Station & Engineering Automation Wide Area Network 1995 LoaderlBackhoe Tractor!Mower Stake Body Truck 2 Asphalt Mix Trailers Dump Truck-Tandem Axle 3 Dump Trucks-Single Axle 1996 Broom, Pickup Street Sweeper Dump Truck-Tandem Axle 2 Dump Trucks-Single Axle 1997 Caterpillar Snow Thrower 3 Dump Trucks-Tandem Axle e 1998 3 Dump Trucks-Tandem Axle 2 Rollers-Steel Drum Type 3 Pickups-l/2 Ton 1 Automobile-4-door Sedan Air Compressor Trailer Sheriff 1994 Unmarked Squad - Investigation Squad Cars - Patrol $15,000 $90,000 Surveyor 1994, Computer Upgrades and Connector 1995 OPS Survey Equipment $24,000 $50,000 e 58 $126,000 $100,000 $45,000 $10,000 $22,000 $21,000 $30,000 $39,000 $20,000 $17,000 $65,000 $144,000 $92,000 $65,000 $96,000 $115,000 $80,000 $195,000 $195,000 $26,000 $45,000 $11,000 $13,000 , Need for and Demand for Improvement e i ._._.__, Equipment and furnish ngs are replaced as they wear out on an annual basis through the budget process. U grades in technology of equipment are usually done at the time of replacement of the om out item. Operating Costs Individual operating c sts for each item are not indicated. Major items, such as heavy road maintenance equi ment, are replaced on a rotating basis with the optimum life expectancy used for ea h item. e e 59 e e e s An Equal Oppo P.O. Box 641 . 119 Fourth Street. Sandston July 21, 1993 Dear City Official: I wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend the League of Minnesota Cities' regional meeting hosted by the City of Sandstone on October 6 at Sandstone American Legion, 206 Main Street. The afternoon p~ogram, beginning at 2~3Q p.m. will cover a variety of subjects during a roundtable discussion. The roundtable discussion will include both subjects of an important nature localLy and statewide. The final program will be published in a Cities Bulletin after August 9th. There will be adequate time in the afternoon program for open discussion of local issues--bring your questions or concerns to the meeting for discussion. The afternoon program, concluding at 5:00 p.m. will be followed by a social and then dinner at 6:15 p.m. Following a welcome to our city from me, LMC President, Leland Swanson, will address the audience regarding the organiza~ion's focus for the coming year. After the President's message the League will present its new video "How to Conduct a Truth in Taxation Hearing" followed by a discussion of legislative matters. The dinner will conclude with door prizes, including a free registration to the 1994 annual conference in St. Paul. .-, To make reservat ions for your ci ty, please return the encl.osed registration form as soon as possible. In case of cancellations. please notify Doug Schulze by October 4. Your city will be billed for those who did not attend and did not cancel their reservations. If'anyone from your city needs special accommodations or has a ~pecial dietary need. please advise us so special arrangem~nts can be made. I look forward to seeing you on October 6. Sincerely yours. v,#/'/I W~~ John A. Wright Host ~ayor We will have city Sandstone. and we agree notified of any changes ~A\~S/TITLES OF PERSONS (Please furnish names of attending so that name t can be prepared) e REGISTRATION FORM OF MINNESOTA CITIES REGIONAL MEETIl<<3 attending the regional meeting in these meals unless the host city is 4. 1993. Person making reservatio (s): CITY: *~umber of attendees Number of attendees PHOi\"E : x $10.00 registration fee = e x $ 8.00 (price of dinner) = *($10.00 registration fee applies only to the fi~st ten registrants) Please make checks payabl registration form to: , TOTAL PAY?\iENT ENCLOSED $ to City of Sandstone and return with City of Sandstone Doug Schulze. City Adminis~rator PO Box 641 Sandstone. MX 55072 e League of Minnesota Cities 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 (612) 490-5600 August 27. 1993 TO: Mayors, Managers, Councilmembers, Clerks c/o City Clerk James F. Miller, Executive Director O~ f111.iuJ League of Minnesota Cities 1993~giOnal Meetings FROM: SUBJ: Again this year the League of Minnesota Cities will hold twelve regional meetings to bring city officials together from throughout Minnesota. At these meetings current policy issues will be considered, as well as practical questions concerning the problems you face. We cordially invite you to attend a regional meeting to join in our discussions. This year, the League's regional meetings are scheduled in Appleton, Luverne, Springfield, Hl3l1ock, Ada, Wadena, Grand Rapids, Sandstone, Avon, Austin, Lonsdale, and Brooklyn Center. You may receive an invitation from more than one host city, depending upon your e location. Please feel free to choose the one which best fits your schedule. The afternoon program will begin at 2:30 p.m. with a panel made up of representatives from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Department of Trade & Economic Development. Department of Transportation, and Department of Public Safety. After a briefing by each state department, there will be a period of questions and answers. Some of the issues to be addressed are: · Hazardous waste accidents/spill procedures · Regulation regarding landfill closings · Trunk highway construction agreements · DTED-newinitiatives · Tourism assistance to local communities · Part-time police, current trends · Changes in charitable gambling laws · Highway patrol arrests within city limits The social hour is scheduled to begin at 5:00 p.m., and dinner will be served at 6:15 p.m. After dinner and a welcome from the host city mayor, League President Leland Swanson will address the group. This will be followed by a Truth in Taxation video, and a fun and informative -LMC by the Numbers- presentation on League services. e I hope you will be able to join us at one of our regional meetings. If you plan to attend, please RSVP the city contact person identified on the attached regional meeting schedule to make your reservations. Come for the afternoon, the evening, or both. I look forward to meeting you there. .{ -:C)., , -- (,'~. ~. J .: ") e GUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 199 REGIONAL MEETING PROGRAM AFTERNOON PROGRAM 3:45-4:45 p.m. anel presentations by representatives of State Departments innesota Pollution Control Agency innesota Department of Public Safety innesota Department of Trade and Economic Development innesota Department of Transportation 2:30-3:30 p.m. 3:30-3:45 p.m. uestion and Answer Session 4:45-5:00 p.m. ogram wrap-uplPreview of evening session e EVENING PROGRAM 7:55-8:30 p,m. elcome by the host city mayor 5:00-6:15 p.m. 6:15-7:00 p.m. 7:00-7:15 p.m. 7: 15-7:30 p.m. C President message - Leland Swanson 7:30-7:42 p.m. , C Video - Truth in Taxation 7:42-7:55 p.m. iscussion and questions about Truth in Taxation L C by the Numbers 9:30-9:00 p.m. G neral questions and meeting wrap-up e r .... .1-' /" .- L; ,.,"~'- '. ~. \ .' League of Minnesota Cities 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 (612) 490-5600 SIGN UP NOW FOR THE 1994 CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE I am Interested In serving on the 1994 Conference Planning Committee I am not Interested in serving on the 1994 Conference Planning Committee I previously served on a Conference Planning Committee year(s) I have not previously served e' NAME: TITLE: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP CODE: TELEPHONE: (where you can be reached during the day) MAIL TO: Darlyne Lang League of Minnesota Cities 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55126 Phone 612/490-5600 e .-. 3490 Lexington Avenue North St. Pault MN 55126 (612) 490-5600 e League of Minnesota Cities LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1 3 REGIONAL MEETING SCHEDULE DATE CITY LOCA nON/CONTACT PERSON Tuesday, September 21 Appleton Civic Center 323 West Schliem an Appleton, MN 56208 Roman Fidler 6121289-1363 Wednesday, September 22 Luverne Luverne VFW Club 705 South Kniss (Highway 75) Luverne, MN 56156 Marianne Ouverson 507/283-9422 Thursday, September 23 Springfield St. Paul Lutheran Church e 2 East Central Springfield, MN 56087 Marian Schwieger 507/723-4416 Tuesday, September 28 Hallock City Hall (basement) 163 South 3rd Street Hallock, MN. 56728 Hank Noel ., 218/843-2737 Wednesday, September 29 Ada Ada VFW 415 West Main Street Ada, MN 56510 , Brian Kranz 218/784-2211 Thursday, September 30 Wadena Wadena Elks Lodge No. 2386 Highway 71 North Wadena, MN 56482 Bradley Swenson 218/631-2383 (OVER) e WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MANAGEMENT GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 3803 . STILLWATER, MN 55082-3803 Office (612) 430,6655 . TOO (612) 439-3220' Facsimile Machine (612) 430-6730 DATE: August 23, 1993 TO: Interested Community Citizens and Health Providers Mary McGlothlin, Director 'fY\P\.~ FROM: RE: Draft Update to 1992-1995 Community Health Services Plan Mary L.. McGlothlin Director Rose Green Office Manager On behalf of the Washington County Board of Health and its Public Health Advisory Committee, I am pleased to announce that our Draft Update 1992-1995 Community Health Services Plan is available for your review and comment. This Plan Update has been developed over the past eleven (11) months through a variety of community input processes including utilization of task forces and public meetings. Our needs assessment also reflects our local response to Year 2000 Health Objectives for the Nation as established by the federal government and Minnesota Department of Health priorities for public health action. The plan identifies priority public health problems and needs in our Washington County community and responds with an action plan to address those needs over the next two years. e The Washington County Public Health Advisory Committee invites your participation in a public meeting on this Draft Plan on: TUESDAY, SEPTEl\1BER 21, 1993 6:30 P.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY GOVERNl\ffiNT CENTER FIRST FLOOR, ROOMS B & C STILLWATER, l\1N - If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call 430-6655 (fDD 439-3220). The purpose of this public meeting will be to solicit your comments on the plan. If you are unable to attend this meeting, written comments will be accepted until September 30, 1993, and should be sent to: Mary McGlothlin, Director Washington County Department of Health, Environment, and Land Management 14900 6lst St. No. Stillwater, MN 55082-3803 e Printed on Recycled Paper 15% Post Consumer Waste AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER e Stillwater Public Library 223 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Board of Trustees Minutes August 3, 1993 Members: Childs, Engebretson, Freeman, *Kalinoff, Maybanks, Nelson, *Ruch, Schmidt, Welshons. Director: Bertalmio. Tony Greiner, Local History Associate. *Absent 1. Call to order: There being a quorum present the meeting was called to order at 6:35 PM by President Schmidt. 2. Adoption of the agenda: Moved to accept the mailed agenda with the addition of item 7.E., seconded, passed unanimously. 3. Communications - Thank you from Sierra Club for use of meeting room. Public Commentary - None. 4 . Consent Calendar: Adoption of Minutes Payment of Bills Committee Reports Monthly Activity Reports Director and other Staff Reports Presidents Report e Moved to adopt the consent calendar, including payment of bills in the amount of $11,230.35. Seconded. Passed unanimously .5. St. Croix Valley Collection and Services -Tony Greiner - Document A Tony Greiner, Local History Associate, was introduced and discussed his plans and expectations for the St. Croix Collection. A draft mission statement was offered. e 6. Old Business: A. 1994 Budget Presentation - Date still open. B. Endowment Committee - Schmidt is still attempting to follow up with Ullrich. C. Intergovernmental Relations Report - Document B was discussed; no action, D. ADA Compliance Report - Concern about front door handicapped access. will require modification. Director will prod architect. E. Other - None. 7. New Business: A. St. Croix Va ley Collection Preservation Grant Request [sent] to the Margaret Rivers Foundation - Document C Noted with i terest and no objection. B. Policy Revie : Meeting Room Policy Document D Noted, no pr blems. C. Citation of preciation for Volunteer Motion to instruct Director to express the Board's appreciation to Mary Pedginski for more than ten years of volunteer service in the children's room. Seconded. Passed unani ously. _ D. Collection D velopment Policy - Freeman reported on progress that the committee is making. She will be traveling extensively and asked for permission to make written reco mendation in October rather than September as scheduled.. Okay. E. Library Part~cipation in Sesquicentennial Parade - Mary Ann Engebret on will coordinate. F. Other - None e 8. Adjournment- Agenda items be ng completed and no other business being before the Boar' President Schmidt adjourned the meeting at 8:15 PM. e e . " e: --. ~ :t - 1 e e .. Please register me for the District 834 Stillwater Sesquicentennial inservice. NAME--------------------------------SCHOOC---------- .5 Salary credit $25.00 Bus Tour only $10.00 Audit $10.00 ($7.00 retired teachers) Return to Nancy Hof at lake Elmo School Sti{{water Cerebrates 150 Xears e e e '\. . f A SESQUICENTENNIAL IN ERVICE YOU MAY ATTEND ONE, TWO, THREE OR ALL FOUR SESSIONS CELEBRATING STILLWATER'S 50 YEAR HISTORY MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13 Session I: 3:15 - 4:15 P.M. OAK PARK IMC. John Runk P otography Collection. Dan Wilson, Speaker. 3:15 - 4:15 P.M. OAK PARK IMC. Northern Li hts, Overview; S,tillwater's history through maps. Phil Fitzpatri k, Speaker. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20 Session II: 3:15 - 4:15 P.M OAK PARK IMC. Art and archit cture of the St. Croix Valley. Tom O'Sulliva , Speaker. 3:15 - 5:15 P.Mj MEET AT OAK PARK. . Bus tour of Stillwater with Anita Buck. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 Session III MONDAY, OCTOBER 4 Session IV To earn a .5 salary credit you must atten all four sessions. Cost for .5 salary credit is $25. o. Audit fee for the five hours is $10. O. You may attend session I, II, or III at no harge. Bus tour only $10. O.