Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-08-03 HPC Packetttllwater THE 8 1 R T H PLACE OF MINNESOTA Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, August 3, 2009 *DOWNTOWN TOUR 6 P.M. MEET AT THE PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE GAS STATION AND VALLEY BOOKS* The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, August 3, 2009, in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF July 6, 2009 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or Tess 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/09-30. A demolition request for a residence located at 223 Pine Street W in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Richard Van Horne, applicant. 4.02 Case No. DEM/09-34. A demolition request for a garage located at 214 North Owens Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Amy Best, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/09-32. Design review for proposed signage for Scentchips located at 204 Main St South in the CBD, Central Business District. Dan and Deb Flohr, applicants. 5.02 Case No. DR/09-33. Design review for proposed signage for The Kitchen located at 324 Main St South in the CBD, Central Business District. Corey Welke, Mathey Signs, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission July 6, 2009 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Micky Cook, Phil Eastwood, Gayle Hudak, Jeff Johnson, and Roger Tomten Staff present: Community Development Director Bill Turnblad; Planner Mike Pogge was present but had to leave due to a family emergency Absent: Jerry Krakowski and Scott Zahren Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Tomten pointed out that Mike Hoefler represented the applicant in Case No. DR/09-19, rather than Mike Monn as indicated in the minutes. Mr. Tomten also noted regarding Case No. DR/09-19 that the selection of the color of the rain curtain resulted in the choice of a lighter brick color, rather than darker brick color. Also, Mr. Tomten noted there were several misspellings of Marc Putman's name in Case No. DR/09-04. Mr. Tomten moved to approve the minutes of June 1, 2009, with the above noted corrections. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DR/09-30 Mr. Lieberman stated this case would be tabled due to an error in the address printed in the notice of the public hearing. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing for the record. Mr. Lieberman moved to table Case No. DR/09-30 as the notice was in error. Mr. Eastwood seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/09-19 Continuation of design review for the proposed new U.S. Post Office at 107 Third St. N. in the PA, Public Administration, and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, Mike Monn, applicant. Mike Hoefler was present representing HAF Architects. He stated several revisions had been made since the last meeting. He reviewed several changes to the landscaping, along with revisions to the exterior materials and signage. He stated the face brick will be a buff color similar to the original Post Office building; the windows in the brick facade will be black he said. The rain screen will be a camel color, with a sandstone color Andersen window in the rain screen. The plans include a standing seam metal roof, with standard anodized aluminum storefront. Ms. Cook asked if the tower would be visible from the Library rooftop. Kevin Kiel, also present representing the applicant, stated he did not think the tower would obstruct any views of the river. 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission July 6, 2009 Most of the discussion centered on signage. Mr. Johnson asked about signage for the tower entry, noting there is no signage proposed by the main entry; Mr. Johnson asuggested there is an opportunity to identify the building utilizing the projecting awning. Mr. Hoefler said he thought that would take away from the architectural elements of the building, thus the signage was back-d away to the southwest corner. Mr. Johnson reviewed the signage as proposed — two, 36 square foot signs on the west elevation (southwest corner of the building), with 80 square feet allowed; 9 square feet of signage on the south elevation, 55 square feet allowed; and signage on the north elevation (parking lot) which will require a variance from the Planning Commission as there is no street frontage on that elevation. In discussion, it was noted that the signage at the southwest corner of the building won't be visible coming up Myrtle Street. Mr. Tomten said the Heritage Preservation Commission often looks at issues of signage that doesn't relate town entry, and he suggested these plans have shades of that issue. Mr. Tomten suggested that in the future, tenants will be asking for signage in the glass tower area. Mr. Johnson stated the signage as proposed does not provide a clear direction as to which entry to use, and stated he remained a proponent of clearly identifying the building as the Post Office building. Mr. Hoefler said using the Post Office as a building identifier is an issue with the client and pointed out the Post office wants to direct traffic to the parking lot and the north entrance. Mr. Johnson again spoke in favor of providing a strong building identity and utilizing directory signage near the entrance to identify building tenants. After additional discussion, Mr. Hoefler agreed to utilize the address, 107 Third St., as the building identifier, placed on the west elevation. Mr. Tomten asked if there would be an extension of the sidewalks to the street on Third Street; Mr. Hoefler responded in the affirmative. Mr. Johnson asked if a copy of the materials would be provided to staff to retain for City files; Mr. Hoefler responded in the affirmative. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the sign package, with two directory signs by the door on the south elevation, and no signage on the west elevation other than the address; the materials as submitted and on file with the City; the landscape revisions as submitted; with conditions recommended by staff and the additional condition that the applicant provide the sidewalk extension and ADA ramp by the tower and stairway entry on the northwest corner of the building. Ms. Hudak seconded the motion. Ms. Cook asked Mr. Turnblad whether the tower would obstruct views of the river from the Library terrace; Mr. Turnblad noted that the tower is not as strong a presence as the existing duplex at the site. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-04 Continuation of design review for an amendment to a planned unit development sign guidelines and sign ordinance for the Village Commercial District, Liberty Village, at the southeast corner of County Roads 12 and 15. Marc Putman, Putman Planning and Design, applicant. Mr. Putman noted there had been a good meeting on site with an HPC member and two Councilmembers subsequent to the last meeting. Mr. Putman gave a brief introductory statement noting that half of the store frontages in the commercial village are turned away from potential customers, giving the perception of a closed community. He noted that when Liberty was developed, the choice could have been made to construct a strip mall, but they opted to design a commercial district in keeping with a traditional neighborhood development, with the storefronts turned into the neighborhood. Michael Oreck, one of the business representatives, noted that the previous issue with banner signs that were objected to by a number of Liberty 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission July 6, 2009 residents has been addressed and is no longer an issue. A new business tenant, Laurel Anderson, spoke of the difficulty she has encountered with people finding her place of business. Mr. Lieberman suggested this is a unique situation involving a PUD, thus the Commission does not need to be overly concerned with setting a precedent. Ms. Cook said she agreed with the need for additional pylon signs, but said she had a problem with the proposed roof signs. Mr. Putman stated they need a greater variety of signs because of the design of the commercial district and the abundance of vegetation which obstructs views; he said the quantity of signage being requested is what they think is necessary for the businesses to survive. Mr. Tomten noted he would abstain from voting on this case. Mr. Lieberman asked Mr. Tomten for his opinion. Mr. Tomten said he would like to respond to staffs comments that it seems appropriate to have signage for this development fall somewhere between the City's standard for business park signage and neighborhood commercial signage. Mr. Tomten suggested that if the City would like to see all strip malls, then it should allow more signage for strip malls than any other type of development. If however, the City believes this type of design is good, then the City should reward good design work with the highest level of signage. Mr. Johnson went through the applicant's request and staff comments listed in the agenda packet. He noted there was no response to the plans to incorporate a branding theme for the development. The request is for up to four 75-square-foot "master signs" up to 20' high, and up to two freestanding monument signs, 25' high and up to 100 square feet. Mr. Johnson said he was confused about the requested monument signs. Mr. Putman said the monument signs are intended to be directional signs. Mr. Johnson questioned having a 25' high directional sign off the traffic round -about. Regarding the request for light pole banner and bracket signs, Mr. Johnson verified that the requested Tight pole banners on the southeast side of Settler's Way have been eliminated to address homeowners concerns. Regarding building directory signs, Mr. Johnson suggested the requested 12 square foot directory signs seem large; Mr. Putman said that size would provide for branding, too. Mr. Johnson spoke of the requested wall signs and roof signs, stating that signage could be redundant. Mr. Putman and Mr. Tomten stated the intent of the requested roof signs is to focus on upper level building tenants. Regarding the requested portable signs, Mr. Johnson suggested sandwich boards would be more appropriate than portable signs. Mr. Johnson noted that the request for temporary banners amounts to year- round use, which potentially represents another permanent wall sign; he noted the intent of allowing temporary banners is that the use is short-lived, not permanent. Mr. Johnson moved to approve the Liberty Village PUD design guidelines with modifications to the sign ordinance to include the following: approving branding; approving up to 4 master signs, 75 square feet and up to 20 feet high; approving up to 2 freestanding monument signs, up to 6' tall on the school road roundabout; approving use of light pole banners and bracket signs north and west of Settler's Way; approving single -faced directory signage mounted adjacent to the door; approving use of wall signage and roof signage as proposed, with the condition that the roof signs be used to identify second -floor tenants; not permitting use of portable signs; approving use of temporary banners as permitted by City code; and allowing use of sandwich boards. Mr. Johnson's motion included the three recommended conditions of approval. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion. Ms. Cook asked if this request would be heard by the City Council; Mr. Turnblad responded that both the Planning Commission and City Council would 3 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission July 6, 2009 review the request. Mr. Putman asked about the directory signage, pointing out that signage is intended to be pedestrian oriented. Mr. Johnson spoke to the potential for that signage to compete with wall signage if it is on a projecting sign. Motion passed unanimously, with Mr. Tom en abstaining. Case No. DR/08-55 Design review of final phase (roof top units) of Maple Island development, Mainstream Development, LLC, applicant. Vern Stefan, Mainstream Development, was present. Mr. Johnson noted the plans indicate the HVAC units are enclosed and asked what other roof penetrations would be visible. Mr. Stefan responded that all roof penetrations would be inside the enclosures. Mr. Johnson verified there would be no other visible roof penetrations other than roof drains. Mr. Stefan stated the fencing for the rooftop enclosures would be pre -painted steel of an aged patina color, about 6' in height. Mr. Johnson moved approval of the plans as submitted and conditioned, with the additional condition that all mechanicals and roof penetrations be within the enclosures to be constructed of bronze -colored steel, about 6' in height. Mr. Eastwood seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-29 Design review of signage for Nutrition Revolution at 200 Chestnut St. E. in the CBD, Central Business District. Julie Armitage, applicant. Representatives of the applicant were present. Mr. Lieberman briefly reviewed the request and staff report noting that the number, location and sizes of the requested signs are pre-existing and can continue to be used. Mr. Eastwood, seconded by Ms. Hudak, moved approval as submitted and conditioned. Motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-31 Design review for signage for Garnet Real Estate Services at 105 New England Place, Suite 145, in the VC, Village Commercial District. Laurel Anderson, applicant. Ms. Anderson was present and provided members with a revised color rendering of the signage. It was noted the applicant is proposing to replace an existing sign and utilize an existing light. Mr. Johnson moved approval of the proposed signage as shown in the revised drawing (Sales & Management also in red) and with the two conditions of approval. Mr. Eastwood seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS • Mr. Johnson provided a graphic of a proposed new sign for Nelson's Ice Cream. It was noted that this site is outside the Commission's design review and no action was required. Members spoke favorably of the proposed new sign and pole. • Mr. Johnson asked about a temporary banner at Sherburne's Jewelry which has been in place for a long time. Mr. Turnblad said the owner has applied for a variance, and the banner will be dealt with pending the outcome of the variance request. 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission July 6, 2009 • Ms. Cook raised an issue with a temporary sign at the south end of Main Street that looks like it was made from a bed sheet. She said she would like to have staff look into having the sign removed. Mr. Turnblad suggested contacting Mr. Pogge about that issue. • Mr. Tomten asked when it might be possible to work on a lighting ordinance as had been discussed several years ago. Mr. Turnblad said that work likely can begin in the fall after the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted. The City will begin reviewing all its ordinances at that time to make sure the ordinances are consistent with the updated Comp Plan, he said. • Mr. Johnson asked if there had been any inquiries regarding the Aiple property/barge formerly occupied by Max To Do. Mr. Turnblad said RFPs have been issued, but most responses have indicated the person is only interested in utilizing the potential for docking. Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Tomten, moved to adjourn at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 5 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 30, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-30 APPLICANT: Richard Van Horne REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a portion of a primary dwelling unit and Garage LOCATION: 223 Pine St W HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 3, 2009 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plann BACKGROUND Richard Van Horne, property owner of 223 Pine St W, is requesting a demolition permit for the rear portion of the existing primary dwelling unit and an existing garage. The rear addition is off the kitchen with an exterior finish of white lap siding. The addition is 21.3 feet by 15.9 feet. The 22' by 20' garage is also proposed to be demolished. The exact age of the addition and garage could not be determined and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office; however, the architect for the property owner believes that the addition and garage are both older than 50 years of age. After reviewing the structure, style, and condition of the structures, it leads staff to conclude that the addition is more than 50 years old. Since the addition appears to be over 50 years old, it is by definition considered to have potential historic significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being TOTALLY removed a new addition is not subject to the infill design criteria. 223 Pine St W Van Horne Demolition Permit Page 2 SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish a portion of the primary dwelling unit. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review... Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the addition and garage could not be determined they are assumed to be over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; The legal description of the property is the West 60 feet of the Northwest quarter of Block 38 of the Original Stillwater. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; Photos from various angles are included in the packet. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the 21.3 foot by 15.9 foot rear addition along with the 22 foot by 20 foot garage are proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; As noted in the application, the original addition was constructed poorly and lacks any architectural connection to the main structure. The garage additionally fails to fit the style and character of the main structure. Funds could be spent to restore these items; however, it seems unjustified since they fail to complement the integrity of the main gothic revival style of the original home. 223 Pine St W Van Horne Demolition Permit Page 3 (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant has indicated that they wish to build a new addition and a new garage. Plans for the home addition are included. No plans have been submitted at this time for the garage. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not totally being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant that restoration of a structure is an alternative to demolition; however, they note that this does not seem to be a reasonable alternative. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant did not advertised the structure for sale since it involves an addition that cannot be reasonable relocated. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the demolition permit as presented. 2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes, there are alternates to demolishing the garage. 3. Continue the public hearing until the September 7, 2009 Commission meeting. The 60-day decision deadline for the request is August 18, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: RICHARD VAN HORNE 60 R 41 854.8 NORTH \ \ EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS IN SQUARE FEET HOUSE = 1,355 GARAGE = 453 OVERHANG = 71 CONC. DRIVEWAY = 41 DRIVEWAY = 592 SHED = 85 CONC. SHED = 8 FRONT SIDEWALK = 63 FRONT PAVERS = 28 REAR SIDEWALK =155 SIDE SIDEWALK = 1 1 1 TOTAL = 2,962 SQ.FT. 33% COVERAGE O AREA: NAIL p` • "� SET IN WALL -- \\ I' -TW 854.6 CO i 1- _ 85?-8J 1 I rTW 8556,F;1�' I BW 85° ,L_ tJ% Ft; 855.4 \\ 8530 • LBW 853AJ -• 853.E FT W 856 71 LBW 855.2J • 453/ Fr�r en-i, Lew 654_i J - Frw ess-3, v • OW 85+_oJ 853.6 O 854.5 Co TOTAL AREA OF LOT = 8,949 SQ.FT. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION !854.1 \ \ (as provided by the owner) The west 60.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Block 38, CITY OF STILLWATER, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. G CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the St3Ve of Minnesota. DANIEL L. R ES License. No. 25718 6-26-09 ate 5-29-09 \ O0 0 853.0 00, 853.4 0' 03 X 853.1 853.0 NOTES: • TW 854.0 3„ i LBW 85L7J 1 /O. 0 h' 230 60 }>FLOOR ELEV = \\ 858.6 0 SET NAIL IN WALL,, .1_ A AFT; 8so: 1 \ PROJECT LOCATION: 223 PINE STREET STILLWATER, M I N N ESOTA 0 20 40 SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET s � 524E !"U4q.8 rTW 65?._ /, LBW 850.2i \_- FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.84' NE'LY OF PARCEL CORNER FLOOR ELEV = 854.9 0 BITUMINOUS 0 DRIVEWAY 53.8 • A / I A / / \ / 1 / 1 / / V V V 60.00 "w �5'41 853.3 853 4 3 852.6 v 852.7 \ CONCRETE 0 DRIVEWAY 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT LOCATED OR SHOWN 2. EASEMENTS, IF ANY, MAY EXIST. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. 4. THE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH OR SURVEY THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES FOR GAPS AND OVERLAPS. CA5 ou CD 0 crl GAS VALVE OVERHEAD WIRES WELL MANHOLE CULVERT GAS METER FENCE CONCRETE r /- < / / / / L / L _ \ • CATCH BASIN HYDRANT SIGN 46o WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE TELE/ELEC BOX 0 LT 554...4, / \ 848.8 8,525, • 848 84 X 847.5 \1 FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.6q NE"LY OF PARCEL CORNER i \ /\ < 5 • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT O DENOTES 1/2" X 18" IRON PIPE SET AND MARKED BY 25718 Suite #B100 200 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LANED SURVEYING, INC 807 North 4th Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Tel 651.430.2139 Fax 651.430.2139 email@douglasdanksassociates.com Associates June 19, 2009 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: Stillwater Historic Address 223 West Pine Street Members of the Commission: I have prepared this cover letter on behalf of Rick and Suzanne Van Horne, new owners of the property located at 429 West Pine Street in Stillwater, Minnesota. The homeowners have recently purchased the property, and will be undertaking work to restore the original 1876 built house to an appearance that more closely matches the original design and construction of the house, including construction of porches on the north and west elevations of the house. The homeowners also plan to construct an addition on the south end of the house, in place of the existing additions. This letter accompanies a Demolition Permit Application and contains supporting information and documents for the application. Historical Significance The structure is comprised of the original house construction, later additions on the south end of the house and minor more recent modifications to the exterior of the structure. From historical information about the structure provided by Donald Empson, we know the original Gothic Revival period house was built in 1876 by John Whiteside, the preeminent plasterer in Stillwater's early history. The original house is solid wythe masonry exterior construction with Gothic Revival characteris- tic arch top and paired lancet windows. The original vergeboard detailing is still intact on the gabled elevations and dormers. Although the subsequent additions on the south end of the house are more than fifty years old, they do not have the same historical significance as the original house. The wood framed additions are not distinguished by a defining architectural style. The appearance of the additions is more utilitarian in nature and detract from the historical appearance of the original house. Cast -in -place concrete stoops are also present as more recent modifications to the existing house. Wood framed gabled coverings were also added above the front and side doors at the stoops. Although the coverings mimic some of the same vergeboard trim of the original house, their roof pitch and detailing are not in keeping with the original house. Proposed Demolition The proposed demolition related to the original structure and the site are as described below and identified on the attached graphic documents. Detached Garage: The date of the construction of the detached garage has not been determined, although it is generally believed to be more than fifty years old. The thickened slab -on -grade construction supporting the structure has settled along its east end, causing the wood framing and siding to sag along the rear third of the structure. In addition, the structure's framing is racked along its west end due to the large door opening and the lack of effective bracing along this face. The design of the garage does not match the Gothic Revival architectural style nor does it have the same historical significance as the house. Rather than invest in the restoration of the garage, the homeowners propose to demolish the garage and construct a new detached garage in the Gothic Revival architectural style to match the original house. Storage Shed: The existing freestanding storage shed will be removed from the site. Additions to the South End of the Original House: The design of the additions located on the south end of the original house is more utilitarian in nature, lacks the historical significance of the original house and detracts from the appearance of the Gothic Revival architectural style of the original house. The additions also cannot be easily adapted to the functional requirements of the homeowner's intended use. The homeowners propose to demolish the additions and construct a new addition in the Gothic Revival architectural style to match the original house. Proposed Restoration of and Additions to the Original House The measures proposed for the restoration of the original house are identified on the attached graphic documents. Preliminary images of the proposed additions to the original house have also been included as a separate attachment. The pro- posed changes to the existing structure and site do not effect the property's zoning or its status in the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan. I would be pleased to provide additional information as required to assist the Historic Preservation Commission with its review of the Demolition PermitApplica- tion. Please contact me if I may be of any further assistance. Sincerely, 6 Doug Danks, Principal Douglas Danks Associates NOTE: INTERIOR DEMOLITION WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PARTITION CONSTRUCTION, WOOD FRAMED FURRING CONSTRUCTION, WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES, CEILING FINISHES, FIXTURES, CABINETRY AND PLUMBING THAT ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. NORTH ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0° c. COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES NOTE. EXISTING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS WILL BE CLEANED AND REPOINTED IN AREAS WHERE MORTAR HAS DETERIORATED. EXISTING WINDOWS WILL EITHER BE REBUILT OR REPLACED WITH WINDOWS ACCURATELY MATCHING APPEARANCE OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS. EXISTING WOOD EXTERIOR TRIM/MOULDINGS WILL BE RESTORED AS REQUIRED, PREPARED AND PAINTED. EXISTING 1880 BUILT STRUCTURE INCLUDING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS, ROOF STRUCTURE, DORMERS, WINDOWS, ENTRANCE DOOR AND TRIM/MOULDINGS SHALL REMAIN INTACT. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PORCH ROOF AND CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE STOOP CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY INFILL, PANELS, AND WINDOW FROM ORIGINAL WINDOW OPENING AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW WINDOW TO MATCH ORIGINAL. 807 Nortn stn Street St cater. MN 55082 Associates c�.v, oxlasnrksas ouatim corn NOTE: INTERIOR DEMOLITION WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PARTITION CONSTRUCTION, WOOD FRAMED FURRING CONSTRUCTION, WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES, CEILING FINISHES, FIXTURES, CABINETRY AND PLUMBING THAT ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. EAST ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" c COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES NOTE. EXISTING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS WILL BE CLEANED AND REPOINTED IN AREAS WHERE MORTAR HAS DETERIORATED. EXISTING WINDOWS WILL EITHER BE REBUILT OR REPLACED WITH WINDOWS ACCURATELY MATCHING APPEARANCE OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS. EXISTING WOOD EXTERIOR TRIM/MOULDINGS WILL BE RESTORED AS REQUIRED, PREPARED AND PAINTED. EXISTING 1880 BUILT STRUCTURE INCLUDING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS, ROOF STRUCTURE, DORMERS, WINDOWS, ENTRANCE DOOR AND TRIM/MOULDINGS SHALL REMAIN INTACT. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PORCH ROOF AND CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE STOOP CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY INFILL, PANELS, AND WINDOW FROM ORIGINAL WINDOW OPENING AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW WINDOW TO MATCH ORIGINAL. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED ADDITIONS AND FOUNDATION SYSTEMS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING TO STABILIZE REMAINING EXISTING STRUCTURE. 807 North 4th Street Stillwater. MN 55082 Associates SOUTH ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 NOTE: INTERIOR DEMOLITION WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PARTITION CONSTRUCTION, WOOD FRAMED FURRING CONSTRUCTION, WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES, CEILING FINISHES, FIXTURES, CABINETRY AND PLUMBING THAT ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES NOTE. EXISTING SOLID WYTI IE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS WILL BE CLEANED AND REPOINTED IN AREAS WHERE MORTAR HAS DETERIORATED. EXISTING WINDOWS WILL EITHER BE REBUILT OR REPLACED WITH WINDOWS ACCURATELY MATCHING APPEARANCE OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS. EXISTING WOOD EXTERIOR TRIM/MOULDINGS WILL BE RESTORED AS REQUIRED, PREPARED AND PAINTED. EXISTING 1880 BUILT STRUCTURE INCLUDING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS, ROOF STRUCTURE, DORMERS, WINDOWS, ENTRANCE DOOR AND TRIM/MOULDINGS SHALL REMAIN INTACT. REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY INFILLAND WINDOW FROM ORIGINAL WINDOW OPENING AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW WINDOW TO MATCH ORIGINAL. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED ADDITIONS AND FOUNDATION SYSTEMS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING TO STABILIZE REMAINING EXISTING STRUCTURE. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PORCH ROOF AND CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE STOOP CONSTRUCTION. 807 North ath Street St, iwater. MN 55082 Associates NOTE: INTERIOR DEMOLITION WILL INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PARTITION CONSTRUCTION, WOOD FRAMED FURRING CONSTRUCTION, WALL FINISHES, FLOOR FINISHES, CEILING FINISHES, FIXTURES, CABINETRY AND PLUMBING THAT ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. WEST ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 'C COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES NOTE: EXISTING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS WILL BE CLEANED AND REPOINTED IN AREAS WHERE MORTAR HAS DETERIORATED. EXISTING WINDOWS WILL EITHER BE REBUILT OR REPLACED WITH WINDOWS ACCURATELY MATCHING APPEARANCE OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS. EXISTING WOOD EXTERIOR TRIM/MOULDINGS WILL BE RESTORED AS REQUIRED, PREPARED AND PAINTED. EXISTING 1880 BUILT STRUCTURE INCLUDING SOLID WYTHE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS, ROOF STRUCTURE, DORMERS, WINDOWS, ENTRANCE DOOR AND TRIM/MOULDINGS SHALL REMAIN INTACT. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED ADDITIONS AND FOUNDATION SYSTEMS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SHORING TO STABILIZE REMAINING EXISTING STRUCTURE. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOOD FRAMED PORCH ROOF AND CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE STOOP CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND TRANSOM PANEL FROM ORIGINAL WINDOW OPENING AND PREPARE OPENING FOR NEW WINDOW TO MATCH ORIGINAL. 807 Nortn atn Street St water. MN 55082 eourpulank!...IssOcoacts wen Associates CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: RICK VAN HORNE 855.2 855.4 60. 041 0 WSET S ikfSIN WALL., SET NAL . ` N WALL --. NSN,\N 854,8 \ 5$ Lit C2853.6 854.5 � 9 co s o� 1 tp tic \I/ \ \854.I s V y� \ NORTH H ' EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS IN SQUARE FEET HOUSE = 1,355 GARAGE 453 � = \°u OVERHANG = 71 g CONC. DRIVEWAY = 41 DRIVEWAY = 592 \\53.4 SHED = 85 CONC. SHED = 8 FRONT SIDEWALK = 63 FRONT PAVERS = 28 REAR SIDEWALK =155 SIDE SIDEWALK = 111 TOTAL = 2,962 SQ.FT. 33%COVERAGE \ AREA: \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ TOTAL AREA OF LOT = 8,949 SQ.FT, EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION (as provided by the owner) The west 60.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Block 38, CITY OF STILLWATER, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the of Minnesota. DANIEL LRtitES License. No. 25718 bate 5-29-09 853.0 N7376 .0°„ % O 8562 BE.' I£ 856.6 egREe 856.7 X 856.5 el CO 8 X 853.1 60. R/w NOTES: X 8555 X 055.70 % '854.9 521 �i-- 854.8 X 854,4 PROJECT LOCATION: 429 PINE STREET STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 0 20 40 MINIMIN SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET y I 49,8 W .e -• potiN;l/ms2" l eol`i PpE 0.84 `1`1 NELY OF PARCEL CDRNH2 850.3 60•p0 6 52.7 593 4 CONCRETE.•• S7� 15 (J 4 CONWAY \ \ 1. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOT LOCATED OR SHOWN 2. EASEMENTS, IF ANY, MAY EXIST. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH RECORDED OR UNRECORDED EASEMENTS. 3. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. 4. THE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. THERE WAS NO EFFORT MADE TO RESEARCH OR SURVEY THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES FOR GAPS AND OVERLAPS. 0 GAS VALVE OVERHEAD WIRES WELL MANHOLE CULVERT GAS METER FENCE CONCRETE • K 0 0 A IIRI 11/ i/1/ Y VP x 3%'=11� '95v26113 848.8 A / / 1 / / - 8. e a4t a5, _ sss; X 8475 1 FOUND I/2" 1-1 RON PIPE 0.611 NE'LY OF PARCEL CORNER f / iN i\ / / it I1 F{ / / / 1 _ i >S L/ f_/ • ♦ / I ' 5> CATCH BASIN HYDRANT SIGN WATER VALVE UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE TELE/ELEC BOX • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT 0 DENOTES 1 /2" X 18" IRON PIPE SET AND MARKED BY 25718 Suite 118100 200 East Chestnut Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 851.275.8976 den* cesurvey .net CORNERSTONE LANE) SURVEYING, INC EXISTING ADDITION EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS NORTH ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 807 Noon 4tt1 Street Stillwater. MN 55082 Associates EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS EAST ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 807 North 4tn Street Stfitwater, MN 55082 Associates EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS SOUTH ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 807 Nosh 4th Street St+ttwater. MN 55082 Associates EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS WEST ELEVATION VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Douglas Danks 807 Noah 4th Street Stillwater. MN 55082 zrYxgl:v4ariktaWn dcs c(cr, EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS PERSPECTIVE #1 VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES Doug fa "E3ank 807 NOrlh 4th Street Stittwater, MN 55082 Associates ern' N,...]Cxry1.sp,9rika3s4 CgdM t rn EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS PERSPECTIVE #2 VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES Douglas wanks 807 North dth Street SGtiwater. MN 55082 Associates EXISTING HOUSE WITH PRELIMINARY PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS PERSPECTIVE #3 VAN HORNE RESIDENCE 429 PINE STREET W. STILLWATER, MN 55082 JUNE 19, 2009 COPYRIGHT DOUGLAS DANKS ASSOCIATES Douglas Dank :a 807 North 4th Street Stillwater. MN 55082 Associates VDC,Igel. can Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 30, 2009 APPLICANT: Amy Best REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a garage LOCATION: 214 Owens St N HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: August 3, 2009 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plann CASE NO.: 09-34 BACKGROUND Amy Best, property owner of 214 Owens St N, is requesting a demolition permit for an existing garage on her property. The exact age of the garage could not be determined and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office; however, it appears that the garage was built around the same time as the home in 1946. Since the garage appears to be over 50 years old, it is by definition considered to have potential historic significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. SPECIFIC REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish the existing garage. 214 Owens St N Best Garage Demolition Permit Page 2 EVA .UATION OF REQUEST Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review... Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the structure could not be determined it is assumed that the garage is over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; The legal description of the property is Lot 11, Block 3, of Greeley and Slaughters Addition to the City of Stillwater. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; Photos of the garage are included in the packet. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The existing garage is an approximately 22' by 15' garage. The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the entire garage structure is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant has submitted a copy of the FHA inspection that was completed for the demolition. That report stated that the roof is at the end of it useful life and there are a number of repairs needed to be made to the garage. No cost estimate was submitted by the property owner related to these issues. The home is in the process of being sold and the new buyer desires for it to be demolished. 214 Owens St N Best Garage Demolition Permit Page 3 (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant indicates in their letter that the area will be left as open space for the time being. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small Lot and is zoned RA, one family residential. Once the current garage is demolished the any new garage would be required to meet all of the current requirements of the zoning code. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; An alternative would be to leave the garage as is. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant has indicated that they have advertised the garage in the Stillwater Gazette on July 21, 23, and 24. A copy of the ad proof has been included in your packet. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1 Approve the demolition permit as presented. 2 Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes there are alternates to demolishing the garage. 3. Continue the public hearing until the September 7, 2009 Commission meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is September 15, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Permit No. Demolition Request Permit Fee $150* Receipt No, Address of Project: o9 / 14 Af iD LL) £ /1( Lot 0 1 I Block 0 0 3 Subdivision Applicant: f Yh Y I?j f 'F- Address:/ L/ L QS" P i-lc, ., et i4u.s Telephone No.; 9 5 a 1 a Cn t' - 1 5 a f 303- cirn vale 55304 Owner if different than Applicant: Parcel No.: 0203 6 ao 3 coo y3 Address: Telephone No. Type of Structure: .._ ci. V'c& 5ct Age of Structure: 7 ( Condition of Structure: PO a 11 fi Sq 'P Intended Use of Site after Demolition: � dJ t A A. l -r-ct-- Signre of Applicant Signature of Owner Date Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 1O-day appeal period hey ended, the applicant wi l receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Buileng rtment The fee for the btdkling permit Is based on the valuate of they demolition proms. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: ❑ Approved o Denied City Planner/unity De pment Director Date Itiome !parcel search 1 sales search .O3O.2O.32.0043 Building Room Count Occupancy Code 101 (Single -Family / Owner Occupied) Rooms Above Ground 0 Year Built 1946 Rooms Below Ground 0 Style 1 Story Frame Bedroom Above 1 Area 512 Bedroom Below 0 TLA 512 Length 0 Bldg Descriptions Width 0 Foundation C Bik Conditicn N orm al Exterior Walls M etal Basement Full Roof Asphalt/Gable/Hip Bsmt Floor Adj 0 Interior Walls Drwl Heating FA Gas Flooring Carpet/Vinyl AC No Architectural Design Rambler Attic N one Single Siding N o Plumbing Style Count Full 1 B asem ent Finish Desc-iptiion Area Units Range Rec. Room Finish 500 Table Avg Garage 1 oft Year Built 1946 Style DetFrame WxL 14x20 Area 280 Condition Normal BasementSF 0 Qtrs Ova- Style N one Qtrs Ove- SF 0 Ctrs Ove-AC (SF) 0 Door openers 0 home 'parcel search I sales search http:llwaahingt.on:minncaot.€zaaac000re:r_.nm.ibeaid:=ros,phrgig:)-5597521&ais —105 7/17/ a09 .d LLB FVV Proof of Publication and Receipt/Best From; Amy Best =northernexpressions Qhotmail.com- To: dumpsterboxsorvice©earthiink.net Subject: FW: Proof of Publication and Receipt/Best Date: Jul 21 , 2009 11:42 AM Attachments: imaae001-ioa Proof of ad Diacement and receiot.odf ATT00150.htm From: v-ambestemicrosoft.com To: northernexpressions©hotmail.com Subject: FW: Proof of Publication and Receipt Date: Tue 21 Ju1200@ 15:31:30 +0000 Amy Best, Receptionist Grubb & Ellis Management Services Phone: 952.832.80H Fax: 952-837-4516 From: Cindy Lehmann [rnalltn:clehmann©acnpapers.com Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:18 AM To: Amy Best (Grubb & Ellis Mgmt Services) Subject: Proof of Publication and Receipt Here is a proof of publication and a receipt for the ad that was placed for your garage. Please confirm that you received this and if you need anything else from me. Thank you :0; • ..... 4. ..... • • • • k:SE t7,01.1 ; ALIrlt4.1 3104 MST OtIMS ."..'F.--.ILWATER IAN .".404;::. cfmtac : ANY n.ohia; 9.3.212.0.775:,%1 110.17:ai] : 77: '3 7. ETILL::WER GAZETTE 1=& IlifInATf04 ORDFA 71,t il7tal/o9 05.,:39 by 5;LOGIN •••••••••••• • N HLart : 07 /21/09 3Le.4. ; 071F09 Time*: Ord: STD 1.00 X 3 . oe 1 : CO V I nzo vxx. von !;A.741 L1 AR GARAGE:30R SAL, nv: 07;110'.; 0.338 c1.00 07/.7.1/03 OR 39 TP IrakT ;TOP 314.M1;7;a3.S1 32. :3;1' 97 ,t;;;:•1:•1 ;::••••.n•9)(•3*." • re.A* " . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . F TILT:NAM. GAZET'.1:1 mon': t• Phunif. number: P *1.'110i; , Poytattl.• • rcl: R..).1,1te • tIAr-:- btY ;13::1'81: Cay3;P: ,.;*437::).14N• 11F. MC1.111. tl.:1 r.b.V.13.10 ? OD:.4C - - - - - - • • 11E4'7. pm 014 .... . — ..... ................ ........... MAPAPO4PRAPPPNWP.PeelMAPAPPOAP 441 SM t• .7 T July=17-2009 City of Stillwater HPC 216 Fourth St N Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Garage Demolition-214 N Owen St To Whom It May Concern: The subject property is for sale. We would wreck the garage to facilitate the sale of the property. We would leave the area as open space. The new owner intends to rebuild the garage. Looking forward to a speedy reply. Sincerely, est July-17.2009 City of Stillwater HPC 216 Fourth St N Stillwater, M'T 55082 Re: Garage I)1-214 N Owen St To Whom It May Concern: The subject garage is located at 214 North Owens and was constructed about 1946. The Structure is a wood frame garage in poor repair. I am selling the subject property and the garage did not pass an FHA Inspection. I propose wrecking the garage and leaving the slab intact. The new owner would rebuild the garage. I have no information on previous owners but doubt if any car of a historical note ever park in this garage. Looking forward to a speedy reply. Sincerely, Amy Best Salesperson: CI LEA Acct#: 318694 AMY BEST 214 NORTH OWE STIL AT R MN 55082 Contact: AMY Phone (952) 261-7521 Fax# E.a i, l : Agency: PUB ZO S2 SV Accc uflt ?-umber: Accofnt name: Phone number: Payment. numb. Payment date PaYmeAt descr±ption- 471z1 credit Card Nu zher: ** Credit Holder Name: Approval code: Amennt Ad Nhmbe A BEST 214 NORTH OWENS STILLWATER MN 55082 STILLWATER GAZETTE AD INSERTION CEDER Printed l9 9:39 by Iri GIN Ad#: 933589 rt. 07/21/09 Stop: 07/24 Times Ord: 3 Times Run: 1.90 3,00 Words: CP1 C:.a s;; 3260 MISC. FOR SALE Des r .pt ' LE CAR A Given by: Created: Last CSC e ATER CA T Receipt 07/21 9 09:40 *.**** 1 PENFIELD, INC. File No. 1126-09/MS Case No. 277-0297260 Uniform Residential Appraisal Report COMMENTS ON SALES COMPARISON : ALL COMPARABLE SALES ARE CLOSED AND WERE GIVEN CONSIDERATION IN ARRIVING AT MY OPINION OF THE ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE COMPARABLE SALES USED ARE IN MY OPINION THE BEST AVAILABLE AND AS ADJUSTED REPRESENT THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES MARKET VALUE. THE USE OF COMPARABLE SALES THAT ARE SIMILAR TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CAN BE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE ACTION OF BUYERS AND SELLERS IN THE MARKET PLACE. ALL THE COMPARABLE SALES ARE LOCATED IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES MARKET AREA. 3r I QUALITY ADJUSTMENT. COMPARABLE SALE #3 WAS SUPERIOR DUE TO HAVING MORE UPGRADES RECENTLY DONE. COMPARABLE SALES #1 AND #2 WERE SIMILAR IN UPGRADES AND CONDITION. I HAVE RESEARCHED THE MARKET OVER THE PAST YEAR FOR COMPARABLE SALES. DUE TO A LACK OF MORE RECENT SALES SIMILAR TO THE SUBJECT a.. PROPERTY, IS WAS NECESSARY TO EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED ONE MILE AND SIX MONTH GUIDELINES. THERE WERE NO SIMILAR SALES IN THE IMMEDIATE MARKET AREA WITH ONE BEDROOM AND SQUARE FEET. COMPARABLE SALE #3 IS A SIMILAR HOME IN A SIMILAR TYPE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT IS LOCATED NEXT TO A LARGE RECREATIONAL LAKE AS OPPOSED TO THE RIVER. tvs COMMENTS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY REPAIRS: GARAGE SERVICE DOOR REPLACED, KITCHEN WINDOW TO BE RE-WRAPED ON EXTERIOR, ELECTRICAL LZlf "2I gl CERTIFICATION, REAR OF HOUSE HAS A NEGATIVE GRADE, HANDRAIL TO BASEMENT IS NON -CONFORMING, KT FAUCET FIXED, SCRAP & PAINT IN BEDROOM CLOSET, SCRAP & PAINT EXTERIOR PEELING PAINT, AND REPAIR SIDING WHERE CRACKED AND OR DAMAGED AND ALLOWS WATER INTRUSION (SEE ATTATCHED PICTURES) 0' THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN MAINTAINED AND UPDATED WITH AVERAGE QUALITY. THE SUBJECTS GARAGE ROOF IS TOWARDS THE END OF ITS USEFUL LIFE. THE APPRAISER IS NOT A HOME INSPECTOR OR ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. THE APPRAISER PROVIDES AN OPINION OF VALUE. THE APPRAISAL DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE PROPERTY IS FREE OF DEFECTS OR ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS. THE APPRAISER PERFORMS AN INSPECTION OF VISIBLE AND ACCESSIBLE AREAS ONLY. IF THERE IS A CONCERN YOU SHOULD CONTACT A PROFESSIONAL HOME INSPECTOR OR AN ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR. CI z; THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED UTILIZING PASSWORD PROTECTED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ACCEPTABLE BY USPAP. BASED ON PUBLIC INFORMATION READILY AVAILABLE TO ME, I HAVE SEARCHED FOR PRIOR SALES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT MAY HAVE TAKEN PLACE OVER THE PAST THREE YEARS AND HAVE FOUND NO SUCH SALES. THE RECENT FORECLOSURE RATE IN THE SUBJECTS MARKET AREA HAS INCREASED OVER THE PAST YEAR. FORECLOSURES HAVE HAD AN EFFECT ON THE ENTIRE TWIN CITIES AS WELL AS MOST OF THE NATION. FORECLOSURES RESULT IN A VARIETY OF TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING SHORT SALES, AUCTIONS, SHERIFF'S SALE, AND BULK PURCHASING. THESE TYPES OF SALES DECREASE A MARKET'S MEDIAN SALES PRICE. THE SUBJECT'S MARKET AREA IS NOW SHOWING MORE STABLE PROPERTY VALUES AFTER EXPERIENCING APROXIMENTLY TWO YEARS OF DECLINING MARKET VALUES. THE EFFECT THE "';:: FORECLOSURE RATE HAS ON THE SUBJECT'S MARKET VALUE AND MARKETABILITY IS REFLECTED IN THE MARKET PLACE. THE COMPARABLE SALES UTILIZED ARE ARMS LENGTH TRANSACTIONS AND INDICATE ACCEPTABLE MARKETING TIMES. THE TYPICAL FORECLOSED HOME IN THIS MARKET DOES NOT ATTRACT A TYPICAL BUYER DUE TO ADDITIONAL ISSUES THAT COME WITH A FORECLOSED PROPERTY. SOME OF THESE ISSUES INCLUDE BACK TAXES, POOR PROPERTY ONDITIONS, CITY WORK ORDERS, PROPERTY WINTERIZATION, AND THE COST TO GET THE PROPERTY TO TYPICAL LIVING STANDARDS. IN CONCLUSION, THE FORECLOSURE RATE IN THE MARKET AREA DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE SUBJECTS MARKETABILITY OR ESTIMATED MARKET-_ VALUE. Provide adequate information for the lender/client to replicate your cost figures and calculations. Support for the opinion of site value (summary of comparable land sales or other methods for estimating site value) I I REPRODUCTION OR I X I REPLACEMENT COST NEW OPINION OF SITE VALUE _$ 25,000 t3ESTIMATED Source of cost data MARSHAUSWIFT Dwelling 532 Sq. Ft. @ $ =$ Quality rating from cost service AVG Effective date of cost data 2008 BSMT. 528 Sq. Ft. @ $ =$ Comments on Cost Approach (gross living area calculations, depreciation, etc.) Garage/Carport Sq. Ft. @ $ _$ Total Estimate of Cost -new =$ 0 Less Physical 28 Functional Extemal Depreciation 0 =$ ( 0 ) Depreciated Cost of Improvements =$ 0 "As -is" Value of Site Improvements =$ Estimated Remainim Economic Life HUD and VA onl 55+ Year Indicated Value B CostA, rroach =$ 25 000 Estimated Monthly Market Rent $ X Gross Multiplier =$ Indicated Value by Income Approach z; Summary of Income Approach (including support for market rent and GRM) Is the developer/builder in control of the Homeowner's Association (HOA)? Yes X No Unit type(s) X Detached Attached Provide the following information for PUDs ONLY if the developer/builder is in control of the HOA and the subject property is an attached dwelling unit. Legal Name of Project HIDDEN OAKS PRESERVE Z Total number of phases Total number of units Total number of units sold -" Total number of units rented Total number of units for sale Data source s) Was the project created by the conversion of existin buildin s into a PUD? n Yes No If Yes, date of conversion. Does the project contain any multi -dwelling units? Yes No Data source. Are the units, common elements, and recreation facilities complete? C1 Yes [] No If No, describe the status of completion. CS,; Q Are the common elements leased to or by the Homeowner's Association? n Yes n No If Yes, describe the rental terms and options. Describe common elements and recreational facilities. rm 70 Marc Produced by ClickFORMS Software www.clickforms.net Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Page 3 of 14 Heritage Preservation Commission D ' TE: July 30, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-32 A" PLICANT: Dan and Deb Flohr R QUEST: Design Review of proposed signage and paint colors for Scentchips L 0 CATION: 204 Main St S MPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial Z o NING: CBD - Central Business District H " C DATE: August 3, 2009 R: VIEWERS: Community Dev. Director P " EPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner ! V \4? DI . CUSSION T e applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a wall sign and u.date the building colors for Scentchips located at 204 Main St S. B ildin_ Si T e plans show that the sign will be 64-inches wide by 27.5-inches tall for a total of 12.2 sq are feet. The sign is proposed to contain the name "Scentchips The Finest in Home Fr„ grance" in beige. The background is black with dark red and dark green accent co ors. The sign is not proposed to be illuminated. Fo retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The sign ordinance states building signs in the CBD ...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot fo each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space facing Main Street is ap . roximately 13 feet long. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 12.2 square feet, w ich is smaller than the square footage allowed by the ordinance. 204 Main St S Page 2 Building Colors The request is also to repaint the store front using the beige, dark red and dark green color. The elevation mock up that shows the sign also shows the proposed colors. RECOMMENDATION Approve as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. The sign shall be non -illuminated. 3. No additional signage. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign DE IGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM CO MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CI OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STI LWATER, MN 55082 Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No,: Fee: $25.00 The • pplicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and sup orting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting mat - rial (Le. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the pro ' erty of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is req ired, Fou een (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All fs!lowing information is required. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project`-) 3 C1\ Assessor's Parcel No. (Required) Zoni g District Description of Project in detail "l h reby state the foregoing statements and al/ data, information and evidence sub itted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and use•" If re • resentative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Prop: rty Owner \o‘'\j' Representative - - '� ► � Maili g Address )`)'4T3 q 1 (L Mailing Address _ :1-5)-)L4"73 -7 , Y, \c C City tate Zip ; ry _ z Mom?6aaity State Zipc,r,:yt, ►v & 5 Tele.hone No. t 19 Telephone No. / ! ,)L % - 93` Signature , Signature (Requir d) (Required) H:\mc amara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 1 2005 Application for Sian Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address aOM 1j - tr\e 3 Jj'L City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Applicant Narr)Name._> r - c. f} J;'''i `._, v �°rAs LC- Phone # rcz`.-)-• LA — yc1 Address..,- t `` - Th City .-� .. State Zip, . Owner (if different from Applicant) Name Phone # Address City State Zip Contractor's Name Name t 00—.c~y r\Cyr /hone # y P ) b� f „ C7 �� \At C} s Cc': � L.— 6 t V O t,^ , \ 1 c State \ L Zip Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC. Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: _ = Square Feet a. Sign Height: (If freestanding) Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: t.t,, CttVat c & isk 6 (.2 e, ti WMatenals: e J. tntrmvci Illumination: ❑ Yes 1 No If Yes, Type: Declaration I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issued related to this equest. r - .._ /Z/sa*A-N. 3 ignature (req Applicant Signature Date Date ) Review (For office use only) ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Date By Permit # Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:\Planning\Forms1Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006 64" 27."x64." x3mm Dibond Signage. 12.2 sf SC E N TC H I PS The Finest in Home Fragrance R ()Al -f H E IN A f 11Z Al 1. ( ) N 1 S popui‘tri ed Imks(,n Doicomiz, to the (1,1?-1, body colors and strong accents inimAccd hv the Aesthetic illovernent, the VictoriCitl Pre5erz,ution Po/cite ha, tV color _vott need to create o historwallv correct Victorian ette,i,ii. A \L,mpttious clortmertt of l-oten. red, and oranges u at .voat fingertips ,hozol rn 5tunnine, combinationsthat d (mid make an 1 gth century homeowner proud. www.sherwin-williams.com I-800-4SHERWIN 657-2838 CS 5/o8 ri,„ EXTERIO., n C THE COLORS. THE PAINT. THE POSSIBILITIES:' ©2001 The Sherwin-Williams Company 0 o111111ii1111 II III 54371 9 VICTORIAN 1900's IT WAS A PERIOD OF CONTRASTS. Natural shades of sand, stone, slate and earth, on homes designed in the style of a Gothic Revival. Accents were everything, with ornate windows, doors and cornices painted in vivid hues that featured every ornament. And whetheryou're faithfully restoring a home in perfect detail, or simply love the look, our Victorian Preservation Palette' has all the authentic colorsyou need. Rookwood Dark Red SW 2801 Rookwood Dark Brown Rookwood Red J Rookwood Terra Coll° Renwick Rose Beige `r SW 2803 SW 2804 Rookwood Medium Brown Rookwood Brown SW 2808 SW 2807 Rookwood Shutter Green Rookwood Sash Green SW 2809 Rookwood Dark Green SW 2816 • Renwick Beige SW 2806 SW 2805 Rookwood Blue Green Rookwood Jade SW 2811 / SW 2811 Renwick Olive Rookwood Antique Gold SW 2815 SW 2814 SW 2812 Downing Straw SW 2813 Renwick Golden Ook 5W 2824 Rookwood Cloy SW 2823 Downing Sand SW 2822 Downing Stone SW 2821 Rookwood Amber SW 2817 TRIM ACCENT Renwick Heather SW 2818 Renwick Olive Rookwood Dark Brown Renwick Golden Oak BODY TRIM ACCENT SW 2815 SW 2808 SW 2824 Downing Slate Downing Earth 5W 2819 SW 2820 BODY TRIM A r'.'. F N : possible palettes Rookwood Blue Green Rookwood Terra Cotter Renwick Rose Beige SW 2811 SW 2803 SW 2804 Downing Straw SW 2813 BODY Renwick Heather SW 2818 Rookwood Red SW 2802 TRIM Downing Slate SW 2819 Rookwood Dark Green SW 2816 ACCENT Downing Stone SW 2821 BODY TRIM ACCENT Downing Earth SW 2820 Downing Sand SW 2822 Rookwood Amber SW 2317 Samples approximate the actual paint color. Some colors limited to select product lines 204 S Main has 13' of store front and is allowed to have 13 or Tess square footage for a sign, centered on the upper portion of the brick above their store front 200 S Main has 34' of store front on Main street and 24' of store front on Chestnut with a total of 58' store front and is allowed to have 58 or Tess square footage for a sign, centered on the upper portion of the brick above their store front on Main Street Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ From: Rick Heir - Sign A Rama [RHeir@signs-roseville.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:52 AM To: Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ Subject: Re: Final Revision Deb, We will be using Tapcon screws drilled into the mortar only. We definitely will not be drilling into the brick itself. That's standard procedure for any historic building. Thank you, Rick Heir Sign A Rama Roseville 651.639.0924 Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ wrote: Can you get me the info on how you are going to mount the sign on the building? The city would like to have that info. We are not allowed to mount to the brick it needs to be mounted in the mortar. also. Thanks DEB Original Message From: Rick Heir - Sign A Rama [mailto:RHeir@signs-roseville.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:50 AM To: Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ Subject: Re: Final Revision Deb, Lori sent me some art on the sidewalk sign. Damon will put a picture together for that Thank you, Rick Heir Sign A Rama Roseville 651.639.0924 Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ wrote: The portion of the sigh detail are the only thing that I need to fill in. But most of this pretty standard, I will call if I have questions. But you have given me most of the info on the sign with the revision here. If I have any question I will call and ask you or your designer. 1 I do have a question on the free standing sign I was going to submit that paperwork also, do you have any ideas on that yet. Maybe we should ask Lori and see if this can be done also. Thanks DEB Original Message From: Rick Heir - Sign A Rama [mailto:RHeir@signs-roseville.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:59 AM To: Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ Subject: Re: Final Revision Deb, Do you think you will need help filling out the forms for the city of Stillwater? If not, I don't need to stop in. Thank you, Rick Heir Sign A Rama Roseville 651.639.0924 Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ wrote: I think it is perfect, I am finishing up the power point and of course you can stop by the sore tonight a take a look at the work we have done. Steele Thanks DEB Original Message From: Rick Heir - Sign A Rama [mailto:RHeir@signs-roseville.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:48 AM To: Flohr, Debra J MSgt USAF ANG 109 AES/SGAQ; DDFlohr@yahoo.com; Lori Subject: Final Revision Lori and Deb, Here is the latest pdf. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you, Rick Heir Sign A Rama Roseville 651.639.0924 2 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 30, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-33 APPLICANT: Corey Welke REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for The Kitchen LOCATION: 324 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: August 3, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner" DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review approval of new signage for "The Kitchen" in the former Stones Restaurant space at 324 Main St S in the Grand Garage. The request would replace the signs along Main St S with a new projection sign and reface the exiting projecting sign along Nelson Alley. The applicant has also submitted information on removing the signage on the rear elevation along Second St and add a new decorative feature in its place. Projection sign facing Main Street The first proposed projection sign is on the east elevation along Main Street. The proposed sign will replace the existing 62" x 92" (39.6 square feet) Stones sign. The proposed new sign is 5 feet wide by 5 feet tall for a total of 25 square feet. The sign will have burgundy standoff letters with LEDs that will light back toward the sign similar to the exiting Stones sign. The background will be painted aluminum color with a black background. The sign will also have a silhouette of a person and a meat cleaver in black. 324 Main St S Page 2 Projection sign facing Nelson Alley The second proposed projection sign is on the north elevation along Nelson Alley. The proposed sign will replace the former Stones Sign, which is a circular face that measures 58.5" x 58.5" sign for a total area of 23.76 square feet. The sign will be a flat panel with a design similar to the one along Main St. The sign will be externally lit. For retail projection signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states projection signs in the CBD are limited to a total area not to exceed six square feet. A variance was granted for the two projecting signs on this site. The variance allows for a 39.6 square foot sign along Main St and a 23.76 square foot sign along Nelson Alley (Planning Case 2006-47). Since the proposed signs are the same or smaller than what was approved in the variance the new signs are considered conforming and does not need a new variance. Entrance along Second Street The applicant is proposing to remove the Stones sign over the Second Street entrance with a multi color (black, yellow, and burgundy) tile pattern. The area is 5'5" tall by 16' 3" wide. No signage is proposed to be installed in this location. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL Conditions for all Signs 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. All temporary signs are to be removed prior to the installation of any of the permanent signage. 3. No additional signage. Conditions for the Projection sign facing Main Street 4. The proposed sign shall be no larger than 5' by 5' in size. 5. The sign shall be lit with halo illumined standoff letter similar to the existing sign. Conditions for the Projection sign facing Nelson Alley 6. That the sign shall not be internally lit. FINDINGS The proposal, as conditioned, meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual and the Stillwater zoning ordinance. attachments: Applicant's Form, Elevation Drawing of the proposed signs and changes. THE KITCHEN 15JULY09 PATIO ENTRANCE MATERIAL WOOD random block thickness for dimensional look width ranges from 1/2" - 1.5" mount to existing frame OPTION 1 16.25' © 2009 Mathey Sign, Inc. (.1,51, MI if, • How to save a picture Simply right -click on it, then "Save Image As..." (Mac users: drag the picture to your desktop.) Free Software! Organize, print, and share your digital photos using FREE Kodak EasyShare software. Download the software Kodak EasyShar€::. Get 20 Free Prints Get started for free at kodakgallery.com and we'll give you 20 free prints (new members only). Plus, create photo mugs, books, cards, and more! Friday, July 17, 2009 America Online: Matheysign 75)5 C A A-4--9Z-LA-y • 11-4. 5-/ iagv1.,vi., Friday, July 17, 2009 America Online: Matheysign S'1 S t/), Al QIb'G4 VI J Friday, July 17, 2009 America Online: Matheysign 1 W�V 1 Vl .1 Subj: Date: From: To: The Kitchen 7/16/2009 1:28:13 PM Central Daylight Time matheysign@aol.com matheysign@aol.com t Kodak prints of this picture, and all your other favorites, at www.kodakgallery.com! Friday, July 17, 2009 America Online: Matheysign