Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-07-06 HPC Packetlwa ter r H E BIRTHPLACE. OF MINNESOIA Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, July 6, 2009 The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, July 6, 2009, in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF June 1, 2009 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/09-30. A demolition request for a residence located at 429 Pine Street W in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Richard Van Horne, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/09-19. Continuation of design review for the proposed new U.S. Post Office located at 107 3rd St N in the PA, Public Administration and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, Mike Monn, applicant. 5.02 Case No. DR/09-04. Continuation of design review for an amendment to a planned unit development sign guidelines and sign ordinance for the Village Commercial District, Liberty Village, located at the southeast corner of County Roads 12 and 15. Marc Putman, Putman Planning and Design, applicant. 5.03 Case No. DR/08-55. Design review of final phase of Maple Island Development. Mainstream Development, LLC, applicant. 5.04 Case No. DR/09-29. Design review of signage for Nutrition Revolution located at 200 Chestnut St E in the CBD, Central Business District. Julie Armitage, applicant. 5.05 Case No. DR/09-31. Design review for signage for Garnet Real Estate Services located at 105 New England Place, Suite 145, in the VC, Village Commercial District. Laurel Anderson, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Jeff Johnson, Roger Tomten, Scott Zahren and Council Liaison Micky Cook Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Phil Eastwood and Gayle Hudak Chair Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Zahren, seconded by Mr. Tomten, moved approval of the minutes of May 4, 2009 OPEN FORUM Mike Robinson, 801 W. Pine St., raised a concern about St. Croix Boat and Packet's new boat, The Majestic Star. He said he did not think the boat reflects the historic nature of the City's riverfront. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DEM/09-25 A demolition request for a garage at 510 Sycamore St. W. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. John Zoller, applicant. The applicant was present and stated the existing garage is collapsing from the inside out. He stated he would like to tear down the existing structure and build a garage that he can actually use. Mr. Johnson asked if the intent was to replace the structure, noting there are several other vehicles and other equipment on the property. The applicant stated the semi trailer on the property is being used for storage as his house suffered water damage; he said the City wants the trailer removed. Mr. Pogge stated the City became aware of the trailer last fall and noted the zoning code is silent on the issue of storage on private property. Mr. Pogge stated the City has been in contact with the applicant regarding his plans for removal of the trailer. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Johnson noted that typically the HPC looks for a purpose for a demolition. If the purpose is to provide storage, he suggested adding a condition that the trailer be removed within a year. Mr. Johnson moved approval of the demolition for the purpose of constructing a new garage or addition to the house, with the condition that the trailer be removed from the property within a year of the date of the HPC action. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion. Mr. Tomten asked that the applicant look at the infill guidelines when considering plans for the replacement structure. Mr. Johnson pointed out there is a lot of opportunity to pick up details of the existing house, for example, roof details, when constructing the new garage or addition. Mr. Lieberman said he would not be comfortable with placing conditions on a demolition permit; he said granting of a demolition permit should be on the basis of an application only. The applicant stated he would like to get rid of the trailer as soon as he possibly can. Mr. Johnson amended his motion to remove the condition; Mr. Zahren agreed to that action. Mr. Lieberman moved to grant the demolition permit. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DEM/09-27 A demolition request for a 5'x13' addition at 505 W. Maple St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Levi Brueegemann, applicant. 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 The applicant was present. He said an existing 5'x7' addition is in very poor condition and an eyesore from the interior. He said they would like to replace the existing addition to provide a laundry area and more room for the kitchen. Mr. Johnson asked if there would b e an issue with the side yard setback; Mr. Pogge stated that would not be an issue. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was closed. Mr. Lieberman questioned the completeness of the information regarding the cost of any alternatives to demolition. Mr. Tomten suggested the scale and size of the existing addition is so unique as to make it not viable to restore/renovate, and Mr. Johnson noted the addition is likely not an original part of the main house. The applicant pointed out replacement would require a new foundation, floor joists and other costly requirements. Mr. Lieberman moved approval of the demolition permit, pointing out that although a detailed cost estimate was not provided, the HPC determined that the existing structure is of an inappropriate size and not historically significant. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/09-13 Review of final colors for the addition to the existing building, The Lowell Inn, at 102 N. Second St. in the CBD, Central Business District. Richard Anderson, applicant. Rich Munson, DBA Architects, representing Richard Anderson, provided the colors samples for the brick and accent colors, precast stone and stucco. Mr. Tomten asked about the size of the brick. Mr. Munson stated the ramp brick is 4x12, while modular is used on the Lowell Inn. Mr. Johnson asked about lighting in the entry; Mr. Munson said there may be recessed can lighting in the entry. On a question by Ms. Cook, Mr. Munson said the entry will be of a more residential style with double doors. During discussion, it was noted that the window trim will be a sandstone color. Mr. Tomten moved approval of the color samples as submitted (brick, stucco, precast stone), along with the sandstone for the window trim, the proposed door style and recessed can lighting above the entry way. If lighting other than the recessed can lighting is proposed, it will have to come back to the HPC for review and approval, according to the motion. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-19 Design review of the proposed new U.S. Post Office at 107 Third St. N. in the PA, Public Administration, and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, Mike Monn, applicant. Representing the applicant were Mike Monn and Kevin Kiel. Mr. Monn reviewed what he saw as the remaining outstanding issues — location of the tower feature, landscaping, lighting, colors and materials, and signage. He stated since the first meeting with the HPC, they had met with Post Office representatives who had approved a second entrance to the post office through the main lobby of the building, thus the change in the location of the tower feature as indicated in the drawings. Mr. Johnson suggested that the entry under the tower works well. Mr. Monn reviewed the proposed landscaping, including the different tree species. Mr. Johnson noted that due to visibility issues with the intersection of Third and Myrtle, trees in that area should be of a 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 The applicant was present. He stated the request is for a projecting sign over the walk-in entrance on Chestnut Street. He said there would be no change to the sign on Main Street. Mr. Johnson confirmed there will be no lighting of the signage. Mr. Johnson moved approval as submitted. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-26 Design review of a Tuscan -style urban patio (Marx Wine Bar and Grill) with outside seating at 243 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Mark Hanson, applicant. Representing the applicant were Mark Hanson and Mark Balay, architect. Mr. Johnson suggested the biggest issue to address is the staff's finding that the Tuscan style is not in keeping with the downtown design guidelines. Mr. Balay responded that the design is a neutral one that makes use of materials already on the building — brick, stucco, stone and iron. He pointed out that both walls in the alley are stucco. He showed a sample of the proposed brick and stated the stucco would match the existing stucco material. Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Cook both spoke in favor of a more contemporary look in keeping with the interior of the business. Mr. Balay responded that this uses old materials in a more contemporary way. Mr. Balay reviewed the 9 conditions of approval. Regarding the condition for a detailed lighting plan, he stated that the light fixtures would be similar to those at Images of the Past and placed in four locations. Regarding the conditions for a curb and ADA accessible corridor, Mr. Balay noted there is a tree growing there and there is no way to provide an ADA corridor; he said they do intend to do a new curb. Regarding the requirement for a trash enclosure, he said the proposal is for a temporary structure as the City is working on a community solution to the problem of dumpsters in the area. Regarding the condition of fire department approval for a fire pit, Mr. Balay stated it is not likely they will be able to have a fire pit. Mr. Johnson suggested the Tuscany style is dating and doesn't speak creatively to the surroundings. He suggested eliminating the brick around the arches and window openings, saying he was OK with the rest of the proposed materials and colors. Mr. Johnson moved approval as conditioned, approving the materials as proposed, including the light color stucco, with round openings but no brick around the perimeter, with the specific light fixture style to be approved by staff. Mr. Tomten seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-04 Design review for an amendment to a planned unit development for the sign guidelines and sign ordinance for the Village Commercial District, Liberty Village, at the southwest corner of County Roads 12 and 15. Marc Putnam, Putman Planning and Design, applicant. Mr. Tomten stated he would be abstaining from the discussion and any action. Michael Oreck spoke of the conditions which resulted in the business owners contacting Mr. Putnam to develop a sign plan. Marc Putnum reviewed his previous work with the Liberty development and suggested that when the original master plans were adopted, not enough was known about the 4 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 dynamics of a neighborhood village commercial district and the plans, specifically for signage, were a formula for failure. He said the intent in the proposed sign plan is to be aware of and sensitive to neighborhood concerns. He noted that he had talked with Todd Remely, president of the development's master board, and the board supports the concept of the signage plan. Mr. Lieberman invited comments from those in attendance. Dr. Ginger Garley, Rivertown Veterinary Clinic, spoke of the need for the commercial district to have a brand, so folks know where it is and what it is. She pointed out some folks thought Liberty was a gated community. Ray Sharp and Brian Scott, of Liberty Wines and Spirits, spoke of the need for adequate signage, speaking to the number of businesses that have left and suggesting that people don't know their business exists or where it is located due to the lack of signage. Dan Connelly, First State Bank of Bayport, said their business does better when their neighbors do better. Salvatore Rosa, of the coffee and ice cream shop, said people can't see their building or signage from Myrtle Street; even in print advertising, he said, folks don't know where the businesses are located. Rita Jackson, Kwik Trip, said their business has been successful and agreed with the importance of branding. Sol Squire spoke of plans for a coordinated on-line marketing effort, including special events, and making the branding presence known physically. Paula Kroening, 213 Pine Hollow Green, urged the Commission to consider allowing more and better signage but also noted that residents do have concerns with how signage meshes with the neighborhood. Ms. Kroening provided a petition of Pine Hollow residents asking that commercial signage be limited and not allowed on the clock tower, light pole at Settlers Way and Pine Hollow Green and at the tennis courts. David Korte, 3515 Pine Hollow Place, suggested that if one part of a community doesn't survive, the whole doesn't survive; he said residents' issue is with the proposal to place signage on the tower clock and light poles, which he said crosses the boundary. The resident of 140 Liberty Parkway, said she wants the businesses to be successful but does not like the intrusion of signage into residential areas. Mr. Pogge stated staff had spent a lot of time reviewing the proposed plan. He said the main concern is not whether more signage is needed, but with the proposed number of pylon signs along Myrtle and Manning and the proposed approval for roof signs. He noted that the plan addresses every type of signage and would allow double what is permitted in any other part of town. Mr. Putnam responded that the signage proposal is project and site specific; he also pointed out that the businesses are hidden behind Kwik Trip, and the attempt is to layer the signage for more visibility. Mr. Johnson pointed out there is a highway side and pedestrian side to the commercial district; he agreed that a strong identity is needed from the highway, but suggested that once inside the development, a different type of signage is needed. Ms. Cook agreed that signage on highways 12 and 15 is critical, but pointed out that everything the HPC does is setting a precedent and the desire is to be as consistent as possible. Mr. Lieberman agreed with the need for additional signage at Myrtle and Manning but expressed a concern about bleeding over into the residential areas. Mr. Johnson suggested focusing on the effectiveness of the signage, suggesting that sometimes too much signage is distracting; he suggested selling the district and Liberty Village and then visually directing customers to the individual businesses. Mr. Putnam referred to the 5 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 signage package plan and spoke of trying to invite folks off the trail system utilizing structural elements, including branding. After additional discussion, it was noted this request will require an amendment to the PUD and action by the Planning Commission/City Council. It was decided to form a subcommittee to refine the proposal and work on remaining issues. Mr. Zahren and Ms. Cook agreed to represent the HPC on the subcommittee. Case No. DR/09-28 Design review for signage, Karma Clothing, at 126 Second St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Amy Carr, applicant. The applicant as not present. The staff report noted that the proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Tomten, moved approval as submitted and conditioned. Motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Johnson pointed out Sherburne Jewelers has had a temporary sign displayed longer than allowable. Mr. Johnson asked about an issue with a "temporary" structure at the Water Street Inn; Mr. Pogge noted the City is working on cleaning up trash enclosures. There was a question about how to deal with Mike Robinson's comments about the new boat; it was decided this was an issue outside of the Commission's purview. The recording secretary left at 11:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 6 iliwater B':RTHPLACE OF MINNESO-`A Memo Community Development Department To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Michel Pogge, City Planner "kW' Date: Thursday, July 02, 2009 Re: HPC Case 09-30: Demolition request of a portion of a residence located at 223 Pine St W Message: The applicant submitted their application with the incorrect address of 429 Pine Street W. The correct address is 223 Pine St W. This error was not caught until after public hearing notices were sent and past the deadline to republish notice on this item. Since correct public hearing notices were not sent, the Commission should open the public hearing and table it to their August 3rd 2009 meeting. From the desk of... Michel Pogge, AICP • City Planner • City of Stillwater • 216 N. 4th Street • Stillwater, MN 55082 651.430-8822 • Fax: 651.430-8810 • email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us SII Ilwater THE OF MNESOA Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-19 APPLICANT: Mike Monn, HAF Architects REQUEST: Design Review of proposed U.S. Post Office and general office building at 107 3rd St N LOCATION: 107 3rd St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial and A/O Administrative Office ZONING: CBD - Central Business District and PA - Public Administration HPC DATE: July 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner M DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a 7,600 square foot new office building at 107 3rd St N. The building is a single story office building with walk out level office in the lower area. The building will house a U.S. Post Office retail store in approximately 2,000 square feet with the remaining area available as leased general office space. SPECIFIC REQUESTS In order to develop this building as proposed, the applicant has requested design review approval for the exterior for the project. BACKGROUND Since the May meeting, the applicant has revised their plans in a number of areas including adding lighting detail, a trash enclosure, and signage. Additionally, the applicant will present building materials to the Commission at the meeting on June 1 for review and discussion. The applicant is showing seven projecting signs (blade signs) on the building. City Code restricts the use of projecting signs to no more than one on each street frontage with each limited to six square feet in size. Staff recommends that abiding by this code restriction be made a condition of approval. 107 3rd St N Page 2 PREVIOUS ACTION BY THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION At the May 4th HPC meeting the Commission reviewed the design review permit. The Commission voted 4-0 to approve a design review permit for the foundation subject to the following conditions: 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan set dated 04-17-2009, which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. No rooftop equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The lighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 6. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 8. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 3rd Street. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, final plans for the trash enclosure will need to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. No trash dumpsters shall be located outside a trash enclosure. 10. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 11. Prior to the issuance of a full building permit, final colors for the building, including, but not limited to, the brick, rain screen, window trim, fascia, and trim, shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 12. Prior to the issuance of a full building permit, material samples of all the elements, including brick, rain screen, retaining wall and stairs, shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 13. The applicant shall discuss with the USPS adding a second entrance to the USPS retail area. If the USPS does not want a second entrance, the applicant will need to rethink the main tower entrance. a. The applicant has indicated that the USPS has agreed to a second entrance through the tower. 14. This design permit approval is only for the building foundation. A second design permit from the HPC is required for the remaining portions of the building and the rest of the site. 107 3rd St N Page 3 ACTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION The City Planning Commission (CPC) reviewed variance requests for this project at their May 11th meeting. The CPC voted 8-0 to approve the requested variances. ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives that can be considered: A. Approval. If the proposed design review plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they could be approved. B. Denial. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Approval in part. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the July 6, 2009 meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is June 16, 2009; however, the City can extend this deadline once for an additional 60 days. RECOMMENDATION With the changes presented in the plans and if the Commission is satisfied with the material selections being made by the applicant then staff would recommend approval of the design permit, with the following conditions: 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan set dated 05/15/2009, which are on file in the Community Development Department. 2. No rooftop equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the site. 4. Projecting signs (blade signs as described on the plans) shall be limited to six square feet in size with one sign along Myrtle Street and one sign along Third Street. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 6. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 8. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 3rd Street. 9. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 10. A second entrance to the USPS retail area shall be made from the main tower along Third Street. attachments: Site plan and Applicant's materials City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission May 4, 2009 Present: Jeff Johnson, vice chair, Gayle Hudak, Roger Tomten, Scott Zahren and Micky Cook, Council liaison Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Phil Eastwood, Jerry Krakowski and Howard Lieberman Mr. Johnson called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Zahren, seconded by Ms. Hudak, moved approval of the minutes of April 6, 2009. Mr. Tomten noted a typo in the first paragraph on the second page, "are" should be "any," and suggested that the reference to a 3D "elevation" in the first line of the third page should be 3D "perspective." Mr. Zahren amended his motion to approval as corrected; Ms. Hudak seconded the amended motion. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/09-19 Design review of proposed new U.S. Post Office at 107 Third St. N. in the PA, Public Administration, and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, Mike Monn, applicant. Representing the applicant were Mike Monn and Bob Eiselt, Trinity Lutheran Church. Mr. Monn gave a visual presentation of the massing of the building as viewed from a variety of vantage points. He described the materials including a darker color brick, lighter color rain screen panels, and metal standing seam roof. On a question by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Monn described the proposed traffic/parking circulation. Mr. Tomten asked about the intent of the design, whether the focus was on a building housing the Post Office. Mr. Monn responded the design focus was on a multi -tenant building with a Post Office as one of the tenants, rather than a generic Post Office building. Mr. Johnson suggested that the Post Office in the heart of the City should be more than a side door to another building; it should be a focal point. Mr. Eiselt responded that it is difficult to make it (the Post Office) a focal point when it is only 2,000 square feet of a 7,600-square-foot building; he also noted the Post Office wants the main entrance where the parking is located. Mr. Johnson noted the focus of the building is at Third/Myrtle Street; he suggested moving the tower/massing more to the north end of the building which would allow the front entry to still be used as an access to the Post Office. Mr. Eiselt pointed out that the Post Office does not want a second entrance due to security concerns. There was some discussion of the use of retaining walls, as well as the slope of the parking area. Mr. Monn noted that changing the slope of the parking lot is limited by ADA requirements. Ms. Cook suggested the proposed structure looks more contemporary than the house that once stood at this location; she suggested that more consideration should be given to complementing the historic district and historic town in which it is located. Mr. Monn responded that the intent is to complement and respect the surroundings not pretend to be an old building. Mr. Eiselt spoke 1 of the efforts to blend the new building into the surroundings by using the same style roof as the Water Department, the tower of City Hall and colors of the brick at Trinity Lutheran Church. Both Mr. Johnson and Mr. Tomten agreed the elements such as the roof, tower and brick materials fit well, but both felt the Post Office presence should be more of a focal point. Mr. Johnson also suggested the square projection on the south elevation looks like an afterthought. Mr. Monn explained the function of the rain screen panels and noted some of the materials relate to the desire to get lead certification for the building. Mr. Johnson asked about the timeframe of the project. Mr. Eiselt said the hope is to begin construction sometime in July so as not to interfere with the top of the parking ramp. Mr. Monn said they would not want to start over with the design, again stating that the design takes elements of the area, is a blend of historic and more contemporary features, and respects the context of the area around it. Mr. Monn also expressed a concern that if the tower feature is moved too far to the north, the building will lose its identification. Mr. Eiselt said a second entrance to the Post Office could be accommodated if the Post Office is OK with that. Mr. Tomten pointed out that the project seems at the concept stage, with a lot of items, such as landscaping, lighting, colors and materials to be filled in. Mr. Johnson suggested the design does a good job of picking up elements from the surrounding area, but he challenged the applicant to look at a different approach, specifically as it relates to making the Post Office presence a focus, rather than a secondary tenant. Mr. Johnson suggested giving concept approval of the footprint, which will allow work to begin on the foundation and the applicant to work with the Post Office, and have the applicant return with details including lighting, colors, materials and landscaping. Mr. Tomten moved to give concept approval to the general footprint and plan, with the direction to the applicant to ask the Post Office about a second lobby entrance, noting that the applicant had heard the Commission's concerns regarding the main entry. Mr. Johnson seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission June 1, 2009 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Jeff Johnson, Roger Tomten, Scott Zahren and Council Liaison Micky Cook Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Phil Eastwood and Gayle Hudak Chair Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Zahren, seconded by Mr. Tomten, moved approval of the minutes of May 4, 2009 OPEN FORUM Mike Robinson, 801 W. Pine St., raised a concern about St. Croix Boat and Packet's new boat, The Majestic Star. He said he did not think the boat reflects the historic nature of the City's riverfront. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. DR/09-19 Design review of the proposed new U.S. Post Office at 107 Third St. N. in the PA, Public Administration, and CBD, Central Business District. HAF Architects, Mike Monn, applicant. Representing the applicant were Mike Monn and Kevin Kiel. Mr. Monn reviewed what he saw as the remaining outstanding issues — location of the tower feature, landscaping, lighting, colors and materials, and signage. He stated since the first meeting with the HPC, they had met with Post Office representatives who had approved a second entrance to the post office through the main lobby of the building, thus the change in the location of the tower feature as indicated in the drawings. Mr. Johnson suggested that the entry under the tower works well. Mr. Monn reviewed the proposed landscaping, including the different tree species. Mr. Johnson noted that due to visibility issues with the intersection of Third and Myrtle, trees in that area should be of a lower height. Ms. Cook asked about maintenance; Mr. Monn responded that the building tenant association would hire a building management firm. Mr. Monn reviewed the proposed window details, colors and materials. Mr. Monn noted that they picked the rain curtain first, which resulted in the selection of a darker brick color to provide a desired contrast; that selection in turn affected the choice of window colors — block in the brick and sandstone in the rain curtain elevation. He provided color samples. Mr. Johnson confirmed the window details, specifically that the south elevation would have the smaller, sash style window which is historically appropriate for the brick, along with other details such as limestone cap and soldier coursing. Mr. Tomten asked about the materials for the various retaining walls and questioned the continuity of the materials. Mr. Monn reviewed the proposed lighting and signage. Mr. Johnson suggested the proposed signage seems excessive, and Mr. Tomten suggested that the proposed use of the blade signs may not be appropriate for this building. Mr. Monn spoke of the desire to provide visibility to the lower -level tenants. 1 There was discussion of various signage possibilities. Mr. Johnson spoke of providing an identity for the building as a whole and suggested using the Post Office as an identifier. Mr. Lieberman suggested identifying the building as the Post Office building with tenants, as opposed to a building with the Post Office as a tenant. Mr. Monn responded that is the building owner's decision, and stated he would have to speak with his client regarding that. During discussion, there were several comments regarding the inconsistencies in the drawings provided to the Commission. Mr. Tomten pointed out that only one color rendering had been provided and said it would be hard to format an approval based on what had been provided. Mr. Monn spoke of their timeframe and Aug. 7 deadline for the Post Office. Mr. Johnson pointed out that plans provided to the Commission had not been updated and also spoke to the discrepancies in the plans provided; he also noted that the location of mechanicals are not indicated in any of the drawings. Mr. Lieberman moved to table pending submission of final plans and to invite public comment because of the significance of the Post Office to the community. Mr. Johnson asked whether the City would extend the 60-day decision deadline; Mr. Pogge responded in the affirmative. Mr. Pogge pointed out that the HPC had granted approval of the footprint of the building and that should enable the applicant to move forward with site work and come back to the HPC in July for final approval. Mr. Lieberman moved to table this case with the applicant to come back to the HPC in July with a complete submittal, stating that the HPC had approved the building footprint enabling the applicant to move forward with site work. Mr. Tomten seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. 2 06-1 7-2009 itectural Deek 3Vreming2.d, 75 THIRD STREET OFFICE BUILDING ABBREVIATIONS A F P Sta HoR FIEILT 0 L P AAAAA EL AMITE FON FOUNDATION POD PARTICLE onsso .I.F,C. ACOUSTICAL FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER PC PRECAST CONCRETE 21:LONOITIO,NIND EEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER ::11F,„ PERFORATEIDI STICAL ILE CABINET . PERIMETER ADJUSTABLE FEE FINISHED FLOOR PL PLATE AINIVE FINISHED ELEvATION Pa.. PROPER,. LINE FLOOR FHC TIRE HosE CABINET PLAII PLASTIC LAMINATE ALTERNATE FIN EINISHIEDI TEE% FLEXIOLE PLAS FLIRTER PLFIG PLUMBING ALUMINUM FLG ruisoloo PLF POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT 2:::IIZTL'''"" FrnOR ;1'.17:=NT 701-. ZIEs`HEDIED/ APPROVED PRAME/0/. CINOI PR pAIR ::°4" TOOTIFE.1 AGNS :111-0 Ll="A" ;:n AVG AvERASE TUT. FUTURE ror POUNDs PER B.A. FOOT E.. EIRE VALVE DARIN. PSI POLINOS PER SQUARE INCH OD ROA. a ns.,3,.....„. 7, :=TD,WEL DISPENSER :EL BELOW PTN PARTITION BETWEEN GALT GALVANIZED MG :=O1 OD GRADE. GRADS. PVC POI -VINYL CHLORIDE PL WO PLYWOOD BuILDINO .0. GASKETILD1 BR SEAM EL OLASS. GLAZING 0 71:: :=13 GYP BOEMPSUM SOARD r ID,:IX TILE H R ▪ ZEg.rS'IES NB Hos, BIBB HO HOLLOW COME RISER r. BRITISH THERMAL UNIT HCP HANDICAPIPEO/ RCP REFLECT. CEILING PLAN RAO RADIUS HO HEAD RIT POOF DRAIN C HOW HARDWARE REV REVISION. REVISE. rA: ZL"C'F;I HEX HEXAGONAL NM HOLLOW METAL REOP RECEPTACLE orr REFERENCE S EM CEMENT HORIZ HORIZONTAL REFL RESLECTIED. IIVE, GER CERAMIC H P was POINT REG. REGISTER Co CORNER BOARD HP HOUR WE'RE REINFORCE.. MED CHAN CHAMFER HT HEIGHT REQ• REQUIRED a:. ::.=„,,,c, HVAC HEATING/ VENTILATION ,„•,. ,...„.. A............ RPM REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE DJ CONTROL JOBB NW HOT WATER RO ROUGH OPENIND Z =LZE MVO HYDRAULIC 1 CLG CEILING fl'EATANCEI INLISCE1 S SOUTH SAN SANITARY LLB CLOSURE INCL. INCLUEIDE MU. SCHED SCHEDULE toro INEORMATION CLIO CONCRETE MASONRY :`E'CT TK'''.7"""R uNrr INOUE INSULATE., 110M1 INT INTERIOR TgET :F., SQUARE FOOT 1FEETI COL COLUMN a JOIST COMB ...NATION JAN JANITOR VN"D '''LAR./ NA/a COmP =4;;RESSIED1.110.. , JOINT S. =RI NAP 2:1 TE'C'E=7, n"K.:: 2=:::.ICE KIT KITCHEN K 9PEC SPECIFICATION SCI. SQUARE KO KNOCKOUT SG STAINLESS STEEL =ZT ffN"S'ffuTT7E1N L STD STANOALIO ""V' '13V141..:22"S '' VD trAFIZZATORY :TOR VE-I'D'R'ADE CONTR. CONTRALTI°. LAW LAMINATEGN STRULTSTRUCTURS STRUCTURAL CORR EOPPIDOR LAT. LATERAL,. SUSA SUSPEND. SUSPENLE0 CPT CARPETIEDI„.. "V riLlAr.7191 T TV ==T.ILE LIO LIBRARY T.O. TOP Or CU KI .IISIC roar irrro 'If tr.7,-... T::..., ;IT" — LT. LIGHT n LTG LIGHTING T60 TONGUE 6 GROOVE . DECIBEL., t'InG :-11117E-R THIS THIC:,1,MLESI -7P7 :rF,71"..E.T PAPER DISPENSER :::. DOU•LE ILII TYR TYPICAL D. DETAIL = .1=LRY jil- UNOERWRITERALASORATORY r DRINKING FOUNTAIN MAX MAIILIIIM 1.4 DIAMETER LIMN ISECHANICIALI LINEXC I...EXCAVATED LINO UNLESS NOTED OTNERWISE DIAZ DIAGONAL MED. MEDIUM UR URINAL v Z:V• ::= .. MFR. vlAtatFAMREIRI./01 MIN. N.M. VCT VINYL COMPOSINON TILE 'IV rej71-'11'3'irE"." • DISPENSER O'El. .1'3171=SPOUT MIME. MISCELLANCLUS MO MASONRY OPENING :,'::T :'/:=1:1E L WO DRAWING LEM LECONTE° vy VINYL. TILE MR METAL VWC VINYL WALL CEIVERING MULL MULLION N EAST EA. EACH EXP. BOLEXPANSION BOLT ELEVATION [LEL. ELECTRILIALI • ==‘,. ENCL. ENCLEISEIEIREI EPEE ENGINEER ' ELIA ffUTPLIEENT EST ESTIMATE CWC ELECTRIC WATER CULLER [2. EXPOSE° EY'P V EXPANSION EXT EXTERIOR M NORTH N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL OD cooseor DIAMETER orr OFFICE ON OVERHEAD OP. OPENING OPP OPPOSITE OC 1,221 t•CS"' ^ ,t 3 3 1 5t111•441" 6 g Is Ter • s s 411 c) V/ WEST 247oW W/0 WITHOUT 7T'r :`s'IG„T WSW WELDED WIRE FABRIC YO Y TR. YEAR H PC S U BM ITTAL PAC KAS E - A STANDARD SUBM ITTAI1 DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 12445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-1760 FAX: 651-430-01S0 CODE DATA A. APPLICASLE BUILD.. COO. 2.7 IKINNESEITA STATE BUILDINS CODE W/ AMENDMENTS INCORPORATING THE FOLLOwING. 2006 INTERNATIONAL OUILOIND CODE 21303 ACCESSIOILITY cCDE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE coot 2006 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE EDO] MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CO. 2004 COMMERCIAL 1111.1,01. ENERGY CODE 2.6 INTERNATIONAL PUEL GAS CODE 9.000 PCP STORY 3.737 SID. SY. PER SEERY PROJECT TEAM Love.7i,nsf orm Serve • trinity Lutheran Church N S 0 151 11.10\ t: CONIP1NN ‘s. .13.11r \sr% HAF It I.: 11. I.: r 111 • "" E I. 1' 111: 5 1.1i1.1761) " DRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET AS 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN LI LANDSCAPE PLAN AR 1 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 2 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 3 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 4 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING A2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A6 ROOF PLAN AEI EXTERIOR ELEVATION A9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION Al 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET ND. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 12445 55'. STREET SulsE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651-430-0 I 80 WWW.HAFARCHITEOTS.COM Sr- - -)(/• s. 4747 HAT • 1;:. ;51.1760 MICHAEL HOEFLER 29210 013-049 NIGH HP0 SUBMITTAL PACKASE A 6 COPYR.Yr MA, PACPWELIM 20011. ALL MOWS 22212•26 DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: TITLE SHEET TO sTmH ASITE PLAN 48.9 T, D4O 36,. t \\'\\\\\:\ \ / y,, ; y A \ \( \ u t ' �' �' v \ t, 1 ,\\ t It l\ 41 \ 1 ' \ \\ \\\ \\ ; I 1 I I \\4a,A\ , \ �j / /` \I l 1`, 1J \ I \ 'A --\\\ G :\ ' \‘\'\ \\:1\\ \ `•"� l \ 1 =\ i \ \\ \ a i v .A\ v \ % \ \\ .\ \, i V\\ yV I \ `\\ \\ �a \\.\ a \yW,v``a \ ,�q G�\ \ �\:, 1 \ \ \``,. \ \ EXISTING \ i�� BIADINS 5ITE PLAN NOTES -EXCAVATION SUB -CONTRACTOR :*W1 PROVIDE TIE FOLLOWING IN ADDITION TO THAT SHOWN ON THE PLAN. A. SILT FENCE AS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE B. TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE. C. REMOVAL OF BITllMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 CONC. CURS/GUTTER REPLACEMENT NT AT AREAS OF DEMOLITION FOR UITLITYS AND THE LIKE. (LE ROUSE DRIVEMAY-ETC.) D. PROVIDE 6' SAND CUSHION BENEATH FLOOR SLAB. E. PROVIDE 6' AGGREGATE BASE UNDER 5106'4N.K E. REGARDING OF TOPSOIL FOR PVTI IRE BLACK DIRT LANDSCAPE FINAL GRADE. 6• EXCAVATION 1 BAC :PILL OF BUILDING- HAUL OJT FITtPP'i MATERIAL H. CITY OF STILL -HATER SEWER / WATER PERMIT AS YELL A5 CITY OF Si1LLW ATER RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT. I. ANY 1 ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AT UTILITY AREAS. J. ANY SAW CUTTING OF 150T1H BITUMINOUS / CONCRETE PAVEMENT. K. REMOVAL OF ANY BITUMINOUS 1 OR CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS WH1 AS CURBS. L 6' X 4' WET TAP OF EXIST. WATER/MAIN. M. 4' D.1P. CL 52 PIPE ALONG WITH 40' BEND 1 UHUPLANGE YV2' OPENING. N. DISCONNECT CORP. STOP AT MAIN. O. CONNECTION TO EXIST. SANITARY SEWER INSIDE RAN. P. 4' PVC. SCH. 40 PIPE AS WELL A5 CLEAN-0WT. O. PROVIDE BACK -ILL / COMPACT UTILITY TRENCH WITH ON -SITE MATERIAL R. THE SANITARY SEAM. / WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED INTO 5RD STREET. 5. THE EXS11N5 HOUSE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INV155TIGATED AND ABANDONED. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 1 2 445 5 5 T" S T R E E T au,rE A LAKE ELMO, 1IN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- S 5 t- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 t -490-0 1 90 WWW.HAFARDHITEOTE1.G0M PROJECT: STREET FFICE SLOG =T�Ro Ix EIM„RTLE ILL -WATER. MI N NESIITS DESIGN. REVIEW INLACINFEI SLASH- I HERM CARS, THAT THIS PLAN. SpeCITICATAIN OR REPORT wAs ERSARED LIT AL DR WOG my DIRECT SUILERVISION AND THE SATE MINNEGTA. Offr— MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑9-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: ANC DESIGNS SHOwN AND °ENCASED HEREIN THEREOF. ARE ENDERIETANV AND CANNOT BE cooLl[0. PART, WITHOUT GERMS WRITTEN CYRKISSACIN Dr PAT ARENIGATS. GCSE ARE As...HANLE FDA LOSE° RDAs AND ATANCITS. VENDORS AND OrriCE ACCORDANCE HMIIxR NOTICE.x Reoxrva ONLY IN ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INroRMATCTO: ARCHITEURAL SITE PLAN AS 1 I'a2 L0' ETT OTHERS �\ I 1 EXISTING BUILDING / EXISTING BUILDING LANPSGAPE KEY NOTES I. GOHGRETE 5TEP5 KITH HAND RAILS 2. FACE BRICK RETAINING WPJJ_ WITH CONCRETE GAP 5. LANDSCAPED AREA 4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK/PLAZA 5. FLAG POLE WITH LANDSCAPING 6. AREA WELL - 5EE PLANS 1. ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER 6. CITY GONSTWXTED PARKING LOT 9. SLOP® SIDEWALK 10. 511E RETAINING WALL BLOCKS (ANCHOR STONE) II. CITY SIDBVALK 12. CITY CURB E. EXISTING I-V2 STORY HONE 14. LOADING DOCK AREA 15. TRASH ENGG.O5URE AREA 16. 6' BLOCK WITH 4' PAGE BRICK I1. 6' CONCRETE KNEEL STOP I6. DUMPSTER la. CITY CONSTRUCTED RETAINING WALL TREE LEGEND 5M. SUGAR MAFI-ES 15. WHITE BIRCH (5) SHRUB LEGEND A - ANNA;iLE SMOOTH HYDRANGEA 5 -DWARF EUROPFAN 09.16I0159191' BUSH G -.LADE CAROUSEL BPft5ERRY D - MINUET YEI6ELA E - HALWAYRDS SILVER F - POLKA WEI65.A 6 - DWARF KOREAN LILAC H - CRIMSON PYGMY BAR ERR1' J - ARROWOOD VIBURN76H K - DARK GREEN YEW PERENNIALS LEGEND AA - GAT MINT/GAT NIP 58 - ZA6REB GOREOPIS CC - WHITE GRAY FEATHER HAF ARCHITECTS HOSFLSR ARCH ITECTO LL.0 12445 5 5 T'B STREET H U I T E A LAKE 21-M0, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- g 5 1- 1 7 6 O FAX 65t-4.20.0I80 WWW. HAFARGH IT£GT13.00M FFICE STI LIwaTER. MIN NES CITA 0.5161,3 REVIEW I HEREBY CERT, THAT THIS P4N. specincxnem OE REPORT :T AM': DULY LICENSED AREw;ECT DER TNC:Awe o:°THE STATE CIA MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NEITICET ERE 'RESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED MEATH °ELs NcLuoiNa ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPHICS. ARO TRENT, ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE CERIET DUPLICATED OR COMMERE.I.LY erxptnrrro, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT EXPRESS winrrEN PERMISSION OP HAF ARCHITECTS. THE. ARE AVAILAELE crm LIMITER REVIEW AND AGENCIES. VERCORE AND OFFICE PERE:EARL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE TRH Aiis NonCr. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 NDSGAPE PLAN I•s20' 0• HAF ARCHITECTS H °SF-LER ARCHITECTS LLB 12445 55T" STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMC1, mNi 55842 PHONE 651-s51-1760 r A X 65 -4SC-01E00 WWW.HAFARGHyrEGTS.SOM PROJECT: OTIREOT IO,FICE SILOS. O1-11-1-WATDIR. MINNESOTA. IDEOIDIN REVIEW PLACITHE: PAX: EPPS,: I warren' CERTIFY THAT PIS PUN, SPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED NY ME DR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION AND THAT I AP A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT I:PERSTE LAWS DE THE STATE OA MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 08-049 MMH NIGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: wit num,. SHOWN AND ...mem PREP INCLUDING •LL TECHNICAL DRAWINOS, 0.1,10. AND PEELS THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY wINIa LANMEE BE COPIED, DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLERT0. IN /PULE OR IN PART. WITHOUT CYPRESS WRITTEN P014104011 OF HAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLY MP UNITED REWEW AND EVALUATION BY CUES.. CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS, AGENCIES, VENDORS AND arr. PERSONNEL ONLY IN A01DROANCE wrrn THIS NOTICE. convrtrawr RAF ARCHITECTE 21708. ALL moms RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 1 AIRCHITECIVIRAL RENDERINS NOT TO SALE HAF ARDHIT5CTS SOEFLER ARCiiiTECTEI LL.0 1Z45 5 5 TP STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, ly 14 5 5 CI .4 PHONE' 651-a51- /760 FAX 65t-A2Ol2D WWW. HAFAR TECTE1. 0 OM PROJECT: 1,11180 8,1-188.ET 13E-08/ 1-1-111881 ITIVIRT-Lre ST11-1-VJATTE SI, ITT IN I EM CITA OESIGNI IREVIEVO PLL-IC/B18: FAX S ETAST.111-: HERMIT CERTIEY THAT THIS PLAN. sprcirt.nori OR REPORT WAS PREPARED ST ME OR LINDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSE° ARCHITECT uryinli HIE LAWS ar THE STATE DE MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MOH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: SEE DESION6 SFICIwN AND DESCRIBED HEREIN INELUDIND ALL TECHNIOAL ORAWINOS, GRAPHICS. ASP MODELS THEREOF ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED, DUPLICATED CR COMMERCIALLY EY,LOITED, IN WHOLE DR IN PART, wrnleur ILLPREBS WRITTEN PERMISSION HAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION RP CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, COIETRACTORS. AGENCIE9. VENDORS SNP OFFICE PERSONNEL DELT IN ACCORDANCE WHIE THIS NOTCE. COPYRIONT NPR ARCHITECTS 2008. ALL MONTS RESERVE0 ISSUE DATE DescRip-riory ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 2 RGHITEGTJRAL RENDERING, NOT TO SCALE HAR, ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS Li,6 12445 55T4 STREET u t1rE A LAKE E1-140, MN 5504s PHONE 651 -8.5 / -1160 FAX 65 1-4212-0180 WWW.HAFARCHITECT13.0010 PROJECT: 91-PEET OFFICE El UI THIIRO .3,1 1.-WAOOD IR , I IN /AI es arr... CAIENTI IPPC/IHE: FAA.: I AERCITE CERT, THAT THIS PLAN, SPECITGATION CR REPORT wAs pRcruEo ST NIE OR LINDER STE DIRECT SUPERVISION AND ZL.IT:1,Aal,A=NSEC ARCHITECT UNDER TNE LAWS or MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 CIS-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE, THE LIESISNS svoveN AND oescanaEo HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, ORAPHIGS. ANC HOOFER THEREOF. PRE PROPTIVART AND CANNCT COPIED. OUPLIGAISO OR cramnEnc.uy CEPLENTED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT =FRCSS WRITTEN PERNIOSELON or “wr ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE PON LOOTED RSA, AND EVALDATON DV CLITHES. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AND DRAGE PERSONA. CHET IN ACCORDANCE WI, TA16 NOTICE. COPYRIGHT HAF ARCHITECTS SODS. ALL PLIAS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION slr ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 3 RGHITECTURAL RENDERING NOT TO SCALE HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECT6 LLC t 3 4.45 5 5 T" STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, t„t N 55042 PHONE 6 5 1 - a 5 1. 1 7 6 0 FAX 65t-490-0100 WWW.HAFAROHITEOTa. O OM T.1FAO STREET OFF -ICE I3Lo6 HI IR0 s STII-E-WALTEIR, MIN I.IEs ora o ESIGN R6v1 EN/ I SERV, CERTIFY THAT THIR PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS RED ME DR UNDER MY DIRECT MION AND .T IRAY LICENSED ARCHITECT O CER THE LAWS O. AM A DULY THE STATE or MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ ❑8-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A DYKE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON oNcLuotroa ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINDS, GRAPHICS. AND RODELS THERM,. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT RE COPIED, DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLDITEO. IN WHOLE. CR IN ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMNED REvIEW AND EVALUATOR BY COENTS. corasoururrs, CONTRACTORS. ADENCIES. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE NIT. THIS NOTICE. C. COPYRIGHT NAF ARCHITECTS 20013. ALL RICHT& RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION s BEET I NFORMAnON: ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 4 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING. NOT TO SCALE I - 92,06 0:1- 0' 04:7. OW 8.-0. II,O. V- 4. g 4. . .' / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 0 ..... .... ... 11 / 10 OrAg 0 . •5 • .. • • 00 ..• . - • :.• 00 00 Ar g .. li 1 --l.' limm r 0 Ems dm •• _ _.._. _. *.D / 0 0 e 0 0 V / 1MAPLE UNIT 1 OPIEIENIT I • • r:A W4 NA' 1 1 _IiII 1 . • . 11 LAD INOKATIS F 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . • A 0 - -1, - 1 1 1 I I- 1 I I • 1- I-- it/ fr .1 - • I' 'im A -r i =.-..- _ .7•t-' --.T L BEAM • 11E 0141 DO ___I 1 iit:ea.. go . I g .._. - ..•• lo...•. / i_j i rp- nfits c.ococlvo _, . . • n,c.• . u II 1 1 m 9 I •• ,_ r — EWA -ISE 4E41 V4' ,41 .. ..., 1_1 — TI•1_11111 .. e - I IMINPLifillill— ' 74r evr . . El • - . \ -, / j — l'fiVAMIlWiDi Mill= , _. :' _ -• ....... 1 1› 4 Adit 0 1 rill .140,0` . - VIPVINIIIIIIIIIPr / ) / / / / - - - r larirIIIIIIIII . IP - . .. . • .... t 1— GONG. SALK ADOV NW • .• . . • 1-1111DEOPPE PICA- LAMENAPE PLAN ICE . • , •• . .• • 1 10WD ' . I Fr • IL -Faro.. It torhe —‘, • - . 0 10 $ • tg id gl _ _il _ Tor or WAJ- 24P IF-0. 2,0. 44 6OIP-0. 11A0. V-Ce 2,0 110.0 4 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCH tTECTO LI t 2445 55 8TREET BUITE A LAKE ELM CI, MR 55042 HON.0 651-D51-1'760 FAX 651 -49 0.0 1 DO WWW.HAFARCIHITEMTB.GOM PROJECT: STREET CIRIPTIEE EILEEI TINIRID mvsrm_m L LWAT ER IN IN E CITA I NERDY CERTIFY THAT TIES PUN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED MY NE OR ENDER MY DIRECT SIIPERTISION AN3 THAT AM A DULY YENNED ARCHITECT LINDeR RE Uwe OF TNT STATE Or MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 09-049 MMH M GM HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE OMENS SHOwN ANC DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING A, TECHNICAL ONAWIN3S. et.witcs. AND MODELS TIERED, ARC PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT ...PIM °CALMAT. CR CONNERCNLLY ICIPLOITEE. .NOLE DR IN PART. WITHOUT °CARESS WRENN PERMIER3N OF NAP ARNTTECTS. THESE ARE AvAILABLE FOR LINTTEC INVIEX AND [VALUATION Dv CUMIN, CONSULTANTS. [EXTRACTORS, AGENCIES. VENDORS AND DERR PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE wITTI RIM NOTICE. C cOXIRIENT CAE ARCHITECTS DOES. ALL MOH. RESERVE° ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION S MEET I NFORNIATION: LOWER LEVEL PLAN A2 (ThLOIAIER LEVEL PLAN 2 11701 DAD *01 IOW 11101 9.7 DAY 4 f///////////////// '/ '/ / / / / / / / / / / / V 2 $2 2 2 2 2 3 LMOSOAlE AIQA, - 56 7 LMOScrre RAM 0 • e '1 J caLave °TAW/ LANDSCAPE AREA O Imw-OOA ID -I Ile' PACE OP ewer AOo11e 2 17 Ai dY OEM -ROA. IDT-11 TOP OF WON* 1 4 EL i 2 2 AREA1E1.1. DE.OR J fm ag mRAL remm OONORETe OIDERALK W L— • x 441 INV v4 No ry DO' a 17' i IW' CAM EP LAM' FLOOR ANNE 14W w PALA OP eEHOM Male RROet TRWO1 0.T.IMN 4O' r V/ O O II II II II eOD ir" II II II II II II 7—EEw - Eva ON W x 1. 1 REAM / / 2 2 i i II O WIN dal 1# OLopI 4." Mil OLD 'e 110101 DOI 74 • WV` 2 s 2 2 4 8 T—LANDOCADe AMA- OQ LaVOYAde FLAR� HAF 411111111111111111, ARCHITECTS H DEFIER ARCH!T£CTH LLC t 3 4.45 55T. STREET a U I T E A LAKE ELMO, 1fM 551242 PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 T- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65t-49D-12 19O WWW.HAFARGHITEGTa.GOM THIRD/ D St R—EL_ET N vlcO aLoo ST R .ATE. I NDOOTA. DESIGN F2EVIEVJ I HEREBY CERTI, THAT THIS PLAN, SRECIFICATION OR REPORT ..T PREPARED DUv NE SUNDER w.EET LI DERPTHE LAWS aSTATE or MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HDEFLER 24210 ❑B-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A MICE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRREG HEREIN MODELS INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL OPAWINE GRAPHICS, AND THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT ee come. DuPLICATED OP COMMERCIALLY .PLDITEO. IN WHOLE 00.1N PART. WITHOUT GORE. WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MAr ARCHITECTS. TN.E ARE AvAILABLE FOR UNITED R.I. AND EvALuAll011 BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS, AGENCIES, VENDORS AND orrice PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACE.IDANCE WITH Tills Non*. CONNING, MAW AP.ITECTS 200B. ALL mool-rrs RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMADON: MAIN LEVEL PLAN A3 MAIN LEVEL PLAN 41, o LODOT 24 HOUR MAIN LEVEL PLAN U: f'a - TI 3/52W-0E *ELF SERVICE RENT A BOX RO OM EIS ORKCli 01 RENT-A-50N HAF ARCHITCOTS HOEFLER ARCHITEGTO LLO 1 3 44 5 5 5 T. S T R E ET 81i 1TE A LAKE ELM O, MN 55642 PHONE 651-351-t760 FAX 65 t• 4 s 0- 0 t BC WWW.HAFARCHITEoT8.60M HIRDI STREET OFFICE EILoo HIRC G MVRTLE HTILLwATE R. MINNES OTA 01E-SIIGN REVIEW I HERESY CERN, [NAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFIC-A[10N OR REPORT WAS PREPARED SY NE OK UNDER LW DIRECT INGYERVISKIN AND INAT AM A DOLT LICENSE° ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE DP MINNISITTA, MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑S•049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE DESIGNS svpwN vup OESCRISED HEREIN MODELS INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL ORGASM., ORAPNICS. AND TIERED, ARC PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT NE COME, DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITEO. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT [SPREES WRITTEN PERMIESION NAN emcwrEcvs. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR UNITED Renege ama [VALUANON BY CLIENT, CONSULTANT, CONTRACTORS, AGENCIES. VENDORS AND OFNCE PERSONNEL ONLY IN E. COPYRIGHT mar ARCHITECTS SORB. AN. PUNTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MAIN LEVEL PLAN U5P5 -TI A3 TI 0 HAF or cowman arrs (AC 01651 NOI6 H.L MNAGIS TO 55 LOCATED AMIN MICA* Imes WM:8 2 0 \ // t 515/05 OPPRm. -T J tt1 SLIM s---1 a —e / \ / a \ _ I I 2 + — I 1 015.051 5 7 1— I 1111.625111, 4I 1 J i 0 4 z i 2 -- 0. eao oa ewe .G 0 0 ARCHITECTS HOCFLEll ARCHITEGTH LLB 1 2 445 5 5 `" STREET SUITE A LAKE SLIM 0, MN 5584S PH ON E 6 5 1-$ 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65t-420-G190 WWW. HAFARGHITEGTa.G OM I-IIRC 91TREET OFFICE EiLOE3 TBEIRID ITEsE STET LA-Se/ATE RR MIN NES OTA CLIENT: 1 HERESY CERT,' THAT TES PLAN. SpECIFICATION ac REPORT WAS PREPARED RV NE. OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TWIT 1 AM • DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE UwS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HDEFLER 24210 ❑H-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: THE SEISMS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS. GRAPHICS. AND MODELS THEREOF. ARE PROPREARv ANO CANNOT SE COPIED. DUPLICATED CR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED. IN WEILL OR IN PART. TGITIOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF HAF PACHITETS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE EDP LIMITED REVISIT AND EVALUATION BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS, ARNOW, VENDORS PHD Dacca PERSONNEL WILT IN ACCORDANCE MTH Gil% Nana, ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SROHEEOF T INrnpMFLAT,ANC N: A6 ROOF PLAN 5/32'.1,0' EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF ,LTDP 2 WALL P1 T 1I2�C P� GHb'rt ,qyL PANEL JOMT T EL. 104 G' TTR war. p,tlPDW(CONG.MAORY) rAr- in'" I.1422 AR PAGE BMOC MTh VP RIHCNS BOO MRH CONON& JOIWTS 2 WA S. N/A 4.2' L1 EIR2e POCKFAG1798E GAP 6. RAN SBRIMN PA6EL616610 OPEN .DINTS CIXLR TO Be 6. PRTMSF® MCTN. PMOA 1. ICY CGh .05(12 PAW- 60P11T 0. PM603Ie10e124. STWOSM SEAM POOP PW W-S PITH OOPS SPA= ROW 00. ACTH A SOCIATE0 PLASRN66 6 TRIM PACE CO OMGK-\\., AIOBLSON CLAD IRGI1EOTIMAL F6NOCM - see 604911E O. MOWED ALUMINUM 9TCINEMINT- SEE Wane II. STEEL BEAM GSIOPY SY91154 PITH MAWS I ER1GA2ID SE SECTIO/e / DETAILS 12. RAN SCASEN PANE- JOINT - T INCAL El. DA86m UME INMATES WINDOPM LOCATED AMEN AKEAreLL 14. CAST IN PLACE GONCJQ7E STEPS EL WOOD U1E IOKAl1E1 COICAMTE PCMI1N45 - SEE PO4DA110H PLAN 16. COMPOSITE PANEL MEGA A. RETARN6 MAL1. 16AGE MOO IN P01620 G26O OR MGK6RdM 16. STD PIPE &IMO RAT. 6 OR 144010.41. N N TOPC�.i71411A N L L L 0 PL APPROXIMATE SRO 51AET 6RALfl • EJDCW.K 21. R6CK COUPONS STARTS 6 EL 15T-0' 2. STONE SILL 22 ERICK SOLDIER =OI lee 70. AICFOR 6Tae T@WNN6 MALL 24. APPROK Sneer ELNA11011 D. STEEL PIPE 1440RAIL 06. 10.210 2/. Sorm 1A4114-SE LAOS0APE PLAN m. cc4D. E1Teu0R 9•36 04. R CKFAOE OONORETE W4JORY So. FACE 1312GWMA5oNIO 0OHi5G. JOINT EL WM:EN PIILL GAP COW. - PIR111L:A662 WA. MASONS SLOPED CNPR'MA.TED POGO BLOCKS* 62 SCREEN MALL COIer. PAZ E ICK AIR FACE 6' CM) Be. QIY OP STILLMATER WK../WM CURD 62Y OEM/ 54. OTT OP ST6IMM E1.AGKTOP PSC ODete AIP CO0214E2E600 WERGOM MEP SLOPE MOOR TO DAWN MAT (TO LOAM& AREAL 66. 6776 O 6TLLLYNTER MAIMS 9T. MEMOIR LHM1N6 SCONCE 60. COMM 6161N4E 0 1.1A6 656NT d En1a' /We OF MICK W z J 1- K 0_ O 10 6 IPAIe-.DINT I� d001-01 Y 41/2 7OP114 EL IIrc` ee*RV_ -4 PAIR 0' M EL 11 10n OPENING Y 9 EL is 7WN SCREEN �{�6 �fT44ED'1 ,�L Zi Y ARCHITECTS HOEFLSR ARCHITECTS LLC 1 2 4 4 5 55T. STREET SUITE A LAKE ELM 0, MN 550$$ PHONE 6 5 1- S 5 1- / 7 6 0 FAX 65 1 -490.0 1 00 WWW. HAFAROH ITEOTS.00M STREET pFFICE BLC[3 HIRC 4 MYRTLE STI LLWATE R. MI ONES CITA. OEBIGN REVIEW CLIENT I NOES MOM MAT Nits AWE SABESCATION RP SPORT was THATTw:OULy LICENSED AEHITERT oE;H"u:s • o.THE sTAVC Or MINNESTA. ' V MICHAEL HDEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NONCE: THE LESIONS SHDwN AND DESLwBED HEREIN THMEM. ARE AROARIETAM ANC CANNOT BE [EPEE PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS wRITTEN ACREISSION Dr SWF AR[HITEcTs. THERE ARC AVAILABLE ERR Marro RENS/ NE WALLETS. BY CuOsys, CONE:WANT, CONTR.-NEE ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 NFORMATIDN: ELEVATION A8 OVATION s32.,P-0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND L MODULAR LAR FACE BRK.K MN 12T RUMS= BC= M4T1 CONCAVE =NM 1 WA 0. WA 4. 2' UMW= ROOIO:M2 EDGE CAP 0. RAN SCREEN PASS PITH OPEN 3211115 COLOR TO BE SPAT® 6. PREMISS= METAL MICA 7. V2. Curry -ET PASS. SOFFIT b. PRE9NCIEM METAL STANM! 6E4 4 POOP PME3.7 MITT SEAMS SPACED I4-0/4' 0D. PITH ASSOCIATED M SK= 4 TREE -I } F 6A a 0 a a 4 ANDERSEN 4JO 4AG4IBOT1RAL MOM- SEE =EXS.E TO. 444OD1= AUMN1i SIDRPPRONT - SC MEE il. STD 004M CANOPY SYSTEM MEIN TS ROCS 4 BRACKETS SEE SECTIONS 4 DETAILS L2. RAN SCREQI PMEL. .OHM - TYPICAL 0. DAS=IJIED A= FIXOPC LOCATED MINK AREMEll 14. COOT Si PLACE CONCRETE STEPS N . DAMS, UM IIOA'AT9 CONCRETE POOTN6S - 58 POROATION PLAN ▪ a.'rual IE PARE. P46OU TI. RETAININMV.L RACE BRKK)M FORESROMO4 CR BAC /RC= 16. EMS- PPE =M b RAIL 1 21 IAIORAIL N. APPROXIMATE SRO STREET ORM= • 5108'M1K 22. BRICK COURSING 5T4R25 6 EL. TST-0' 21. SICK SILL 22. BRICK SOLDIER C411E a. 44Y.4OR STONE RETAIN= MALL 24. M%AC STREET B.EVATON DB. 5T®. PRE 144MORAIL 26. PAT10 27. SLOPED LAMN S LORDSC4PE PLAN 26. CONC. EXTERIOR S E= 24. ROCKFAf2 CO WPER MASONRY SO. P4C! ERICK/MASONRY CONTROL LOINS S1. SCAM POLL SIP CG8.T. - PIRSIN9m MLMAL F.4CNIM SLOPED OYER TKAT D POGO BLOCKING 00. SCREEN MINA. CORMS. PACE ERICK AIR SPACE 5 CMJ e. an OP SHEER M=CONCQR ans 420 CREW 54. CITY OF STILUMT= ELA4Yl= Of OMB= 55.6 CONCRETE 0.44 M4EROOMI RNISN SLOPE nom TO DRAIN MAY i0 LOADING AREA/ 06. CITY OF STLUM= SETA MO MALL BT. IMISTOR L144)9* OOOOE SS. EXTERIOR 5141444E 4.. IISEOMW. ARBOR ELEVATOR B.. a If'R03M0'1 HAF ARDHITECTS H OEFLER ARCS 1T£CTH LLD 12445 5 5 T" BTRE ET H U I T E A LAK£ "MO. MN 55048 PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 1- 1 7 6 A FAX 0.51-A2E4-01E10 WWW.HA7ARGHITEGT8.G01V1 HIRO STFIEET OFFICE 013 LE sL BTILLWA ER. MINXES CITA EMAYII PREPARED I Hooey cLifiln: THAT THIS PM, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS HDIREST SUPERVISION D THAT IAM A DUI.T LICENSEDARCHIITTECT UNDER r tnwE OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ ❑ 5-049 M M H M G H HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: TIE OMENS SHOWN AND DESOMBED HEREIN THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT BE COPIED. DUPLICATED OR CONLIERCIALLY COM-DITECI. IN WHOLE OR IN ARCHITECTS. TRESE PRE svAria.m. TOR UNITED REVIEW Ann EVALUATOR BY CHEWS. CONSULTANTS. CORTRACTORS, AGENCIES. VENDORS POO Orrog polatl.n. ONLY IN ALLORGANCE WON NOTICE. O CDr+RICIHT RAT ARCHRECTE BOOT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: E LEVATI 0 N A9 ELEVATION 5l32°..P-0' Y CL IFi'-4E EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND L MOGLLAR FACE MGM MTH V2' MAIM BOND PITI4 CONCAVE JOINTS 2 WA 0. WA 4.2 U421401E ROCKPAC0¢'40 CM 0. RAIN SG10991 PANES M TN OMEN JOINTS Calf! TO DE DELEGItfl 6. 1943442657 PETAL PASGA T. V2' GOMDSRG PNE SOFFIT 0. PREMISED METAL STAMEN SEAM ROOF PANELS MN SEINE SPAGCO 11-0V4' e4 MN A900GATED RA 43135 4 7W4 @$IMK1 - LL00 4 ANSER oN GLAD N4G10 1A1WL Moon - SSE 6043:41.E 0. ANSOLIm ALLMWM STOREFRONT - SEC 6CIE[U.E II. SOIL EG64 CANOPY 9YS104 MN TEMPS 4 DRAGNETS SEE SIMMONS 4 0E1A ILS 12. RAN SCREEN PANEL J00IT - TYYPIGAL D. DASHED LEE IIIDICARS HMO* LOLA. CD /i7HN AfEAYELL 14. CAST IN PLME 0OIICAETE STEPS B. OM9ED LEE NDICATES OONOPETE POOfi19 - SEE MYJIRDATION MOAN k. C4PP09110 PAWL PM1A T1. RETAINS, MALL MACE ER10K) IN M'OI@BWODD 4 OR BACE6Rg0D 16.81132 POE WARD PAL 4 OR IAIMWL K APPROXIMATE 9R9 STF@T SRAM R MEWL( 20. ERICK COIRGN6 STARTS • EL 7ET 44 2I. S7Gft SLL 22 BRICK 723/234 GOIRSS 20. A4424014 STONE RETAE4N6 MALL 34. APPRO0 sneer ELEVATION 20. MJRE. PIPE FMICRAL 26. PATIO 2T. 0LO40 LAMH$ LAIID5GAPE PLAN 20. CONY.. EXTERIOR STEPS 24 ROCA?AGE 00444717E 14. 01RY 0 00. FADE 010K 41BOIRY G n,w 1 .DNI 91. WRIER HALL GIP 00 0L - PREITNI91W PETAL FLASHI 4 91Lf'®OVER /SEATED MDCD 2.022E10 O 2 !GREEN MALL COAST. PAd BRICK AIR SW! 6 CMJ 00. 611Y OF STILLMMTER OC 120112 CIA® D0Y 01011300 SA GILT OP STNJ'N= EUGKi0P 06Y 0111.15) S0. 6' COMMIT! SLAB MEMO! MDR SLOB FLOOR 10 DRAIN A47AY fro LOADING ARA) 96. CITY GP ROLMMTG4 IQTABEID HALL 01. 1001900111.16011110 SCOI102 36. EXTE41GR SWAM fi E O O O el 0 F 4�T k3.. 11Zb' er MAGIC' 1054 E Ti Wes' 1 4 e- ^4 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFL0R ARCI-4ITECTO LLB 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T O S T R E E T 8 U I T E A LAKE ELM O, MN 550.4E PHONE 651-as T-1760 FAX 651-48o-01 B0 WWW.HAFARGHITE0T8.0O1A STREETTHORP El FFICE O EMYRTLE HIR STI LLWATER. MIN N EIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION DR REPORT WAS PREPARED A DULY E LICENSED ARCITTECT LINDER THE LAWS Dr RSION AND AT I<NTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑5-049 M M H MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE A NOTICE: TIE ESIONS SHOWN ARO DESCRIBE° HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL CRATING.. GRAPHICS, AND MODELS TNERCOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT TA COPIED. OCPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY CPPLONCO. IN %TOLE OR PT PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMIRSTERI or OAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LRAM, REVIEW MD EVALUATION BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AND arncE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITY THIS NOTICE. C. COPYRIGHT HAF ARCHIE.. EWE ALL PRINTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION All EXTERIOR ELEVATION 33�'• I'-0' 06-1 7-2009 1 4.• lg "i VILOCATION MAP E'vrmabsvy5,. 'f'4 ‘t • 2 StlIV TH I R ABBREVIATIONS A P AB ANCHOR SOL 0 "r A'"' "" GITE"g=0"1.114 C IR IT Z:TC'Z'f gI=ETE AS 2.1'11rTgIrifTI-ONINEI 'Ff.. . _C F.11,=>J1NOIJISHER ::ZM ::17I?E'T‘E'Fr' ACT ACOUSTICAL TILE "NT' ::OLVT71,741-:HED '" ..E.1=1'n'T:L"" PL PLATE N., pROPER. LINE 2r:17E7I.ItirEr FIN FINISHIE01 „ry,,LLII..1 ALUMINUM ;n'' 'F"TI7ILR'G FL. pLumBINIS PLII POUNDS PER LINEAR rocrr " '=ET:i..V4.‘..'"A" 2-113FR ''t-.74T:leT;t41- :CI IZZIBLHED/E0/ Appo AppRov. PR PAIR AppRox ApPROXImATE ". 'F71;1=E.T1'"e' pREFAIIPPEFAIIRILATE10.1 ARCH ARCHITECT...I FORTING Auyo AuTC.ATIC FF7U'R FURRED. FURR.12 """ """:"-CTION e C FIRE VALVE ...ET BD BOARD _II pT FAIN.. PTO PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER BEL LIELD:‘,„, GA GAGE. GAUGE PTN PARTITION BETW B GALV GALVANIZED Go GRADE...TARN. LEIRIF2E 1PL wo pLywoo0 eumcluo GET GASKETIEDI IIM .. GL GLASS. GLA2ING 0 :"L GYP ITOGY.L11.1 BOARD ElinT BRICK BAsETIENT Ho HOSE BIG RISER ,18,, GO. SIDES T BRITISH THER61AL GRIT HCP HANDICAPIPEDI HC HENLEY. CORE RAD RADIUS RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ND HEAD Cla CEILING C. CLOSET IN IRONIES, „ sOUTH OLR C.ARIANCE1 ANITA. INCL. INCLUEIDI. cINGI CLS CLOSURE um,' SECT SECTION INT INTERIoR CO CLEANEST sr BouARE FOOT IFEETI RD Roar DRAIN How NARDwARE REVISION. REVISE. HEX HExAGONAL IREOP RECEPT.LE • HOLLOW METAL RORIE HORIZONTAL REEL REFLECTIED. IIVEI H.P. HIGH POINT RED. REGISTER Hp REINF REINFORCEIN1. con, HT FIFJOIFF REG. REQUIREO NTS HEATING HVAC HEATING.ENTILATION, ocooLunoos PER HINUTE Ro ROUGH OPENING Hyo HYDRAULIC 17" COEF CEIEIT15l1 JSGL SINGLE =;f1 ==ATION • JOIST BHT SHEET CDT. COmPRESSIEDINONY .T„';;1°' IIBLEI = SA.= NAM: TE'C'ECET::7, :• <c2CTE:ur SPEC SPECIFICATION SO. SOMARE %'..nt"SjT :=TIZT7EIN SS STAINLESS STEEL STD STANDARD 2:117.Ts- CONTR. EONTRACTIORI LAM sr,. STORAGE STRUM' 3,n11.3Gri.naL. STRUCTURAL SLISP SUSPEND. SUSPENITE0 CORR CORRIDOR, fS"' %717.7rE"It'INK co F-r cueiC PROT WE,/ LAT. LATERAL LAV LAVATORY LB POUND., rl 'S IL. Ta A Te" t:'.' IL.ri'VTLI_O'AD LP LOW POINT LT. WONT LTG LIGHTING 71.1:0 =17' T. TOILET PAPER OISPENS. rt.. ocueoc TYR TYPICAL " =ITENT mAN m.o., M r DIZI,:1,13,, FOUNTAIN TIAX MAXIMUM MECH. MCCRANICIALI U EXC uocxcAv•von LABORATORY DIA . t„,atl ILLNELS NOTE0 OTHERWISE 1-1"Nr 1.1. mASONRY 1,1,ET RETAIL 01. DIAGONAL NED. MEER. MEMB MEMBRANE 01.7 :=" M.. mANLIFACTUREIRI. 101 miN. MINIMUM V CoIlm,„ DIMENSION MEZZ MEZZANINE VCT VirLcCAOLMPOSITION TILE %'. MISR. MISCELLANEOUS '11.!..,1 1=SPONT DRAWING MO MASONRY ONENINO VINYL WALL COVERING MULL MULLION EA. EACH N wW WEST EXP. BOLEXPANS1ON BOLT N ELEC ELECTRICIALI N,E,,,,„, Nun.. Ww., WITDII." TAD wooD FL ElEvATION Z.T.S. 217IVT"El't CALE .0 WITHOUT ENO ENGINEER 0.A. OVERALL 0 EN.- ENCLOBEITIRE/ WP WATERPIROLIFING wpm wORKING POINT OD ON CENTERIER wT WEIGHT EG. EQUAL m. :. .1,D OVERH3„.1.,.iSci:E DIAMETER wwF viLL.0..... FABRIC YEAR fi.WC tr...E.CLTI:,,I,C WATER OH EA :7471. :717LiT 07 OUNCE./ EXP EXT EXTERIOR T TEL TELEPHONE TEmP TEMPERATURE f 1 5 000‘ 504 - HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE - ,ESNIAGE._ SUBMITTAL DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 12445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-1760 FAX: 651-430-01130 CODE DATA W APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES 2007 MINNESOTA STATE MINDING Col. WI AMENDTIENTS INCORPoRATING THE FOLLOwING. 20126 INTERNATIONAL SUILDINO CODE 2002 Accoast000rrf CODE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE .06 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CORE 21202 MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE SODS NATIONAL CLECTRICAL CODE SO06 COMMERCIAL BUILDING ENERGY ceor 2006 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAB CODE B. SEISMIC ZONE C. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION D. CONSTRuCTION TYPE v.s C. •LLOWASLE AREA R.CCEI PER STEM., F. ACTUAL AREA 9, R. ITER ST0Ry O. ALLOWABLE NO. STORIES H. ACTUAL NO. OF STORICS PROJECT TEAM Love. Ran,- Serve trinity LUrher311 Church S. %. \ 1,1 1111in 1.5 OU 1.1.6c • ,1111.6umt,l1IN NI-11171 k. H X.F L N DRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET AS EXTERIOR ELEVATION A9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOECLER AROHITEOTS LLC 12445 55.`“ STREET 211.1,TE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651-43C-01SO WWW.HAFAROHITECTS.COM 1 S. 1. 1N1,1,111,1 HAF./ , 1 5 T MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 0S-049 MPIN MOH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE B mcnc. .1.1.• issue DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: TITLE SHEET TO EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF 1TOP OP NALL LS- IUD rANS- JOINT OD‘-o' ,L►A146. JOINT `P EL I04'-O' $ (CQLKaMAtY, (cow, MAOGRT, EL 4�a 161-D PACE or SICK-\ I. M4ODTLAR PILL NECK MTH VT RUMEN 04O MM CONCAVE JOINTS 2. WA S. WA 4. 2' UFCRAE ROp N,Cb WEE LAP S. RAIN SGE6i PANES MR CVEN JOINTS COLOR TO BE SELECTEE 6. PR EPINE ED FETAL rMG4A 1.112. COMMIT! PINS. 9ORTT 6. PRSIN'JITm METAL STNONs EPA4 ROC? PN15.6 MM 91916 !.KID I1-0/4. OZ. MTN ASSOCIATED FLASHERS 1 TRM "PT$ 1. NIVPION GLAD ARCWIEOTURM. MOON - SOEPULE 10. ANLOUED MIMNM STONE PdR - SEE SCwSE II. STEM 3E114 CANOPY WREN MTH NE -ROCS 1 NOKKETS SEE SGTI016 1 DETMS R RAIN 8OPes1 rMa. JOINT - TYPICAL B. DAMlm LINE IMOCATES MOONS L4 A1ED M111N 10554E.1. 14. CAST IN PLACE Cc*,I...IL SIMS 6 COSNTO UME SCIGATIS GONGE7E MORR6N - SEE rouNom10N PLAN 6. COM'O6RE PAWS. FASCIA TT. REU64 6 PALL (PACE NIIGQ 61 POPEOR000 1 GR SACK6ROU47 6. SRE PRE WARP BALL 1 OR HkbRAL 'DP $ --4"1 :Y LN i L IL APPROX6WR SE, SHEET SRAM R 51176NUC 20. SPECK CGSEW6 STARTS 1 L 1ST-0' 21. STONE SILL 2. RECK SOLDER CORM 28. APCIOR STONE RETNMM PIA/J. 24. APPROX. STREET 6EJAT ON 73. SEEL PRE NAPORAIL. 26. PATO XI. SLCPCD LAMFSS LNOSGPE PLAN 26. COW 01TBECR SIBS 24 POCKPALG CONCRETE IASOIRY SO'o MAX 11 6NT EL. bra p SO. PILL ETROWMWONRY CONTROL JOINT OL SCREEN PWJ. CAP GOUT. - PIEP4ENID PETAL PLMN66 SLOPE, OYER MATEO MOW EOOK66 92. SCR EN NAIL OONST. PACE NICK AR EPAG 6'G11 LO. GTY OP STE11M161 CGCRTE CURS RY OTHSEJ 94. CRY OP 9IEJ.PIATTR BLACKTOP mT OTHERS/ SS S' CONCRETE BLAB PLNOOOM PRISE SLCPE ROOK TO DRAIN NAY tr.,' LO/1266 ARYJ 06. G1Y Or STI LPMT60 RETAINS* N41.1. 91. INTBECR LI NRW SCONCE BD. IX1D11OR 06NASE 0 /PACE OP BRICK TOP .rOa $ 3'-6' X 916NP6E AREA S-6 X 9`-6' 516NASE AREA 6.2 4 El. 114'�T� T I$o"YLaE'ai -ran' Ai�G60 A �77agOPPlo�oK� $ i44845r) 1g1 0.0 l'. R°' ' [ . 1'r-o . RAIN 6C10'J91 MO' TOP er P 4 6-OS 51 GNAGE SIGN SIZE: 36,75 S.E. PROPOSED A R C H I T E c T S HOEFLER ARCi-1ITHCT9 1_ 1. 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 "S S T R E E T SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 5504a PHONE 65 1 -a5 1 - 1'y60 FAX 65 1-4fl0-a1 a WWW.HAFARGHITEGTa.GOM REST F CIFIDE ISLO11 HIRO S. MYRTLE STILLWATER, MINNESDTA. DESIGN REVIEW WAS THATPREPARED R N A ODD: ICE�SED ARE NV DER TILL LA S DrTHE STATE DT MINNESOTA. Of- MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ ❑8-049 M M H MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE B NOTICE: THE colors sHowN !3COM.° HEREIN INCLUDING ALL ITCHNICAL ORAWINSS. DRAPING,. AND EIDOELS INEREOP. ARE PROPRIETARY AM, PAncii OE COKED. DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLORE.. IN WHOLE DR IN PART, priPui Olptss WRITTEN PERMISSION or i-mr ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMITED REVIEW AND pAupicti BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS. ALENCIES. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN w sport RAF-.cHRcrn OMB. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION Srel•-T' INFORMATON: ELEVA99 N A8 ATION 9l32'=1'-0' ALLOYED: SO 5.F. EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND i EL l22'-6' c Wl Il4ob'1 8_ lot' 1-I/6' 1400711465 ATION L 14724014 rAce BRKA P11H 1/2. R616116 5210 P1161 CO COMG JoBCf9 2 WA 6. WA Y LII431DIe RoCICFACL Mee cM' 6. RAIN 8CAEEN PMFIS NTH OPBI.8815 COLOR TO BE 6. Pe7IP4614212 6121M. rA6GA 7. Va. G0 081E FAO. soMM 6. PRIEM:S ED METAL STANOIW BeA4 ROOF PANELS MN BEAM MAC® 11-0)4' OA MIN A96001A7ID MAMBOS 4 1104 AM BR6ON 4AD AR[Ni91tRN. MoorI - BB BCi®1Le M4C0= AW4MM 9TD11@4041. - sec BCNmE m II. BT®. BEAM ONbPY 5757e4 18114 TIE-Rco6 4 ERACKEIS 9S BecrioNe $ MAILS D. RAN Went PANS .MNf-17141CAL B. DA1HCO UN6 MDCA181 041470116 l.0G .18) PITIBN ARrJNB- 14. CART M PI -Me coNc efe 61814 6 AMMO LIIC ROZA7m C@CREM r8OR4tl8 - BEE FOUNDATION PLAN 10. ,..7.evrIf PMa PA94IA r1. RTN/426 MALL MAce BRIM M PGd 20 / ORIIAOK6RUW 10. 8Im P61B RUM, RAIL 4 OR KA DRAL -ummm�nn iiifiilYtifftift`Ti�iiii= APPRONIIMTE Blm 91feet MAIM • 608444.K 20. BRCK COLR51N9 91AR15 • EL T97W 24. Side B81 22 BRICK 52.0934 CAME 29. M4Y4+2R sD1e RerAM6tl MAIL 24. AR%!K sneer MEVA90N 24 81BBL Mire f WORM 26. PAM 27. 9Ll WOMB LMDS4MM RAN 26. 40114 EN181bR 6172165 x ROOONce CCNCRere MAOONeY So. FA= EFKA4w90148Y coNt1OL -DIM 91.626142MA LCXca1er.- M17511 42O PCTN-rLA9MN6 eLoreD P/84 7REATIM MOOD 111.02064 D2 924216( PALL CO18T, rAOE MICK AIR crAte D. 'A. um Or 9181YA78C GONGR18 OM (Or 01114 84. C111. Or 871LLAATeC BACKICP 69Y OTHERS) 86. T COIC4e1 BEAD WILROON 19419116LorE FLOOR 7O CRAIN MAY 60 L.OADIN6 AMA) 87. ENIBCOR 1J661TIN6 WOIC! 90. DMZ, 910M°6E I'-6' X S.-0° 51644P6E ALAS T88 OP MALL Yi IBb' A PR OX STTNJAJTTIIN O JLPNe CT62-O) 5I &NAGE SIGN SIZE: q S.F. PROPOSED ALLOWED: 55 Si. HAF WNW ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARON ITECTB LLB 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T" STREET SUITE A LAKE EL -MO, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- 2 5 T- 1 7 6 O FAX 65 1 -420-0 1 Ha WWW.HAFAROHITEOTB .O OM HIRO s ICE 011 HIRE/ QTEE OFFICE sL TLE STILA 1-WTERR, MIN NES OTA OEHIGN REVIEW I ALPERT DER'S, THAT MS MAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PRNFLLICO BY ME OR UNSER MY DIRECT SURERNSION AND THAT AM • OULT LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑B-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE B NOTICE THE OMNI. Svowv AND DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECH... ORAWINOS. GRAPHICS. AND MODELS THEREO, ARC PROPMETARY AND CANNED SC OUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY ERPLOITED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMS.. 07 MAC ARCHWECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE [OR LEurtoarvteRANI: [VALUATOR ST CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN AGCCIROANcE WITH THIS NOTICE. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION S HEET INFORMATION: ELEVATIO N A9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND HOOlAR PA66 MCA MTN VP RIINIK 00110 PITH CONCAVE.GINT6 2. WA D. WA 4. 21 L687130 RGi10'AGE r96E GAP O. RAIN 6G455l PANS MN OPEN JOINTS COLOR TO OE 6. PRDTIl180 YCrAL r9EOA 7. I/O GOKOSIR PAWL LOME 6. nRE•IaNEO PETAL STAI4M6 ELM4 ROOF PAWS MIN 06446 WAGED 11-5/4. OG. YRPI MSOOLATOD P A611606 • TRIM 4. AWR9ON CLAD NGN1FG71WAL MOOR - SEE 53163LE W . IJE42020 ALI.6INI4 DTOPSE RENT- 5E0 WHEELS IL 5T116. BEAM CMIOW 5T1444 41N 7115-ROO5 4 WICKETS SRE 5110710415 4 L0TAILS 12 RAM 4CROEN PALL- 47617 - TYPKAL D. DAefm LPt INDKATD YDL'Cre LOCATED 41141I1 MUSAMILL 14. CAST IN FLACO CONCRETE TOPS M. OMN® LOC 6DICAT6 COIKROTE 4OO11446 - SS P0.00A7I64 PLAN 16. C.C44PCOME PANS MSGA M. MAW* MALL FACE BRICK) M PONJRORD OR DALK6162317 b. 51151 PPE 61070 REAL 4 OR %M ORML O 1 YLAITI4OXIMATO 4162 WRIST GRAM • 55194M-K 20. NOCK COUR9616 6TAR15. 11.T5/b• 2L 470N0 SILL 22. VOCK SOLDER COMM 25. MIGIOR 5701! 1CUMN9 MALL 24. APPRO6 9114IEET 152YA1411 20. SIR. PRE ~RAIL 26. PATIO 27. SLO W LMMFSG LAW WIPE PLAN 26. CON... OXIERIOR 611676 24. ROCKPACE MA506:Y DO. PAGE ORICKW CRY COMM JXNT 51. SCREEN MML CAP COOT. - PNEP9N19f® MTAL H.A94146 901132O ER TEAMED PbCC MOON* 52 SCREEN Y4LL COI4T. FACE ERKK MR WACO a cM1 55. CRY OI 6691J400 CONCRETE CORE 69r °O LN 64. CRY Cr DflLLPMTDR A.AGKTOP (5" 07144710 05 6• CONCRETE DLAD 4EROO4 POOH SLUE FLOOR TO DRAM MLA" (TO LOADIN6 MON 06. GMT OF SR L/MAIM RETAMII6 MLR. 07.151715701134310469004 56.10-18IOR 516FASE ,L TTPIC.I4 TOPI/D' O' KALL '4!i fW4 MAL 1+ Mx1 a4o1+Ge .4� Q�� E•31C45-QE71;ld„^5 +eamze;fLin'-n- O 1- ✓ O 4 10• TPOr 71�OF Mr OP OTU-U'NTOR MALL QQ�-910 T17P 6- • (154 FLOOR 4 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLSR ARCHITECT° LLC 1 3 4 4 5 55.r. 3 T R 6 E T O 11 I T E A LAKE SLMO, MN 55C42 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651-490-01 El WWW.HAFARGH ITECTa. MOH HIRC STREET: OFFICE ISLCG THIRD 6. MYRTLE STILLWATER. MINNESOTA EIESIGIM REVIEW I IIERLOT CERTIFY TEAT THIS PUN. SPECIFIOAIION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NS OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND ;I...r,==4:=EZD ARCHITECT LINDER THE LAWS OF MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 1.110.1C CT OB-D49 M M H M G H HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE B NOTICE: THE OFSIONS SIPPER ANO DESCRIBED HEREIN Neweem ALL TCCLINICAL DRAWINGS. GRAPHICS. AND LIDOCLS THGCCIF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE CDPIEN, DUPLICATED OR CONRERCIALLY omeorrev, IN WHOLE DR IN PART. WITHOUT IGIPRESS ,Nrrrer. PERMISSION OF RAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMPED REVIEW AND GRALUATION SY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AMC OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITS NOTICE. C COPYRIGHT RAF ARCHITECTS ZOOS. ALL mums RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: ELEVATION A 1 0 ATION 3/32'RI'-0• EXTERIOR ELEVATION — KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF L MOOILAR PAGE BRICK MPH IC2' 11214146 !OIb PITH OONGAYC.YNNTS O. WA S. WA 4. r LIMESTONE IIOCKPACE 106E GAP S. RAM SCAM PNKdz SITH OPEN JOINS COLOR TO !E SHPGT61 6. PRE/HMV MEM PACGA 1. 4.2. COMPOSITE FARM SOATT Q A@716111132 PETAL STANOIM SEAM ROOF PMELS MTH 93.6E SPACCD IT-044. oz. MTN MSOGIMED FIRS 11Y61 TRH C- IOO'D VOM OPQEIISS IOR NATION 4. NLIY4ON CLAD ANCHITEC IRN.IIIDOM - S@ lGPE:ur D. ALDDIZID AJl9NRi STORE FRONT - 69.641LE II. STEEL TEAM CANOPY SYSTEM PITH TL RCOS L !RACKETS SEE SECTIONS 1 DETAILS n. RAN SCREEN PANEL .ONE - TYPYAAL IS. PASSED UNE INDICATES PIIOOY4 LOLAT®MHN AEAPE L 11. CAST N PLAN CONCRETE MVPS E. DA9192 LIE INDICATES C0C )4) POOTINS6 -SEC PAMATION PLAN 16. G01T EITC PANS MEGA TI. RETANNS N4LL. P'KE MUCK IN POP0.0D 1 OR AACKER01LD I& MBE APE WARD PAL 4 OR HANDRAIL. M. APPROXIMATE SRa STREET 6RADE41 SICI MLK 20. ERICK COMBO STARK S I _ 131-6. 2L STONE SILL 22 BRICK Y/.Dmt COIRY OS. ANL7gt STOW RETAINS KN./ 24. APPROX. BMW' ELNATIDN 8 EMEL PPS N4IDRAL 23. PATIO 21. SLOPED LAPKSQ LAOY.APE PLAN 26. CON!. E RTERIOR STEPE 24. ROGPACZ 0214CRETE M450141¢1 POST OTCE ENSNARE SO. PACE DRICKSWOOKRY GONIROL. JOINT METAL 8.961NS SOP® OVOR TREATED MOD E.OGKINS Ell WREN PiAll labL PAGE ERICK AIR SPA= IP CMS W. GRY Q STLLIYNTER COIDIQl4 cum 614 DRECV SR. CAW CP 56LL114TO[ &J'GKTOP (Of OFORSJ CONQEIE &1A614EROOM MEN MOPE FLOMS TO DRAIN AWAY hD LOActw AREA) 36. cry CP STILLS/ATM RLTANN6 PAU ST. !WORM L11M71M SCONCE 36. ENTERIC¢ S1/1YdE IMP 3C0K Ilo O !L IOb4 YA li 100 iNMVS Epp, LACLam. MOOR POOT1N66A SIGNAGE VARIANCE ARCHITECTS H04FL4R ARCHITECT.] LLC 12445 55'+4 STREET BUTTE A LAKE 5LM0. MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- B.5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 1 -450-0 1 H0 WWW. HAFARCHITEGT8.00M PROJECT: HIRO STREET PRICE HRO aLOG I6 RTLE STI LLWATER, MI I. N as OTA OESIGN REVIEW 1 HERESY LERTIFY THAT.1s P.N. Av[nnuTT°N OR REPORT SPREPARED A DULY E ISION D LICENSE° ARCHITECT UO NDER TH.W6 F AT IANTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 08-049 MMH M G H HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE B INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL °PAWING, ORAPHISE. AND 1.11:10ELS THEREOF. ARE PR...PIE/ART AND CANNOT ee °DPW, DUPLICATED OR GONNERCIALLY 4PLOITEO. IN WHOLE OR IN PAP, WITHOUT C(PRESS RPM! nammelos Hew AR.FTECTS. THESE IRE AVAILABLE FOR UNITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION 0, CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACT., ADENOIES. VENDORS AND arn. PERSONNEL ONLY IN wrtn THIS NOTICE COPYRIGHT HAF AR°1ERR 200e. Au RISNTs RESER�Eo ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION All 06-1 7-2009 THIRD STREET OFFICE BUILDING ABBREVIATIONS A F P FO n FORAYED. ACT •COURTICAL TILE CABINET :r" :"Tr" AFF ABOVE FINISHEO FLOOR FIN FINISHIE01 PLAN PLASTER ALT ALTERNATE FLEX FLEXIBLE ALUM ALUMINUM FLG FLASHING PNL PANEL AP ACCESS PANEL FLUOR rworeactIrr PR PAIR ARCH ARCHITECTIURAL, VrG FOOTING AUTO AUTOMATIC FUR FURRED. FURRING PRO2 PROJECTION AVG AVERAGE FUT. rirrure PSC POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT :DL BOARD P. PT PAINTIE0/ PTO PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER E BELOW PIN PARTITION LT: IIETE'"' GAL,' GALVANIZED 'LKCL TIfli'll'I‘" ▪ RN, BOOTPSUM SOARS CIT QUARRY TILE O BSI.IT :TEEM E NT NB HOSE BIBB R RISER :I% 2T'' '''" NC HOLLOW CORE HCP HANDICAP1PEDI RAO RAOILIS RCP REFLECTED CEILING P4N HO HEAD 120 ROOF DRAIN NOW HAROV/ARE CAB CABIN, HEX HEXAGONAL = NM HOLLOW METAL IIECP RECEPTACLE REF REFERENCE AP E'R' CERAMIC NORM HORIZONTAL REFL REFLECTIED. OVEI CORNER SUARO HR RUHR 'AM HTG HEATING FIVAC H.E.AILI=ENTILATION, Z:. = "A'''. "" Tgt.TTZ31.71=1.' .4* .1.„.,........ RPM REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE I( RO ROUGH OPENINO L 2g;:=. HYD HYDRAULIC LE/ CEILING I ra .6 snuTH LO CLOSET IN IRONIES] LR CLEARIANCEI LS OLCIEURE MU carrcrrre MASONRY =,.. UN, 0 CLEANEST OEF COEFFICIENT J :,,-- :I TETT' COLLINN 'JAN ..:ITNITOR SIM SIMILAR 171'1.4: COMBINATION COMPRIESSIE01,IDINI. , :=1'1":17/ 27.7"7.:Z. KO KNOCKOUT LAM LAMINATE101 LAv LL.;k‘, LB T LER NANO EA TOP OF LIN TEL TEMP CW COLO WATER TT6G' LTG LIGHTINO TNK 'L. tIn'E-li OB DECIBELISI LDR ''"" IT1117211SI M ZEZIr"T MAN ,MNUAL MAR MASONRY nEXC 'f*IVETIETZTZ' L'.."'A"'. OF UR URINAL 'Z/2.1. =I= MEMB MEMBPANE V ...;;PEI VAPOR SAPPIER OIVIBION VET l',1=:71• TUT " VERTICAL VWC MULL MULLION w N VO WITH NO NUMBER :1'11'12'0W W/CI WITHOUT n'il':1:11'3PCOTI71." " "tDrEr'Onl'AMETER WT WLIGHT :CS'="'T 'OTP ITI4TITE OH OVERHEA0 YO YARD EXP. %[':0.:1713 11171'."3 . OUNCEIS, LOCATION MAP Art.P' z.sw VI 1.thony z2 sitthick arm 1, •-g HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE - C WI N DOW SUBMITTAL IMAGE I \ . , , ../ , ; . ,.. - , i ___ __------, i "•.. ---. ; _ ....... ,, , 10. •• , , g , , • ..... rt / . it.,--_--- ' • r ,, --- ----____------ - . ,. : -----.--- ---- --- -----,— ...7.-,—---.J.--,.. ---, ,-,..----...-- ---. ------ \\I.' DIRECTORY CODE DATA OWNER AMENDMENTS INCORPORATING THE FOLLOWING. ARCHITECT 2003 ACCESEISILITY COOL zone INTERNATIONAL FIRE CO. 2006 INTERNATIONAL FUEL. GAS CODE . 2. HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 12445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-1760 FAX: 651-430-01E10 v.. e. ALLOWABLE ARRA r.arra PER STORY r ACTUAL AREA 2 PROJECT TEAM 410 . Love. Transfip-m Sow • P.). trinitY V. III\IIIIIII fil 11.1)11(I Cfl111.00/ ,r. III:: r..ltr 'Ir.,t.lt :r11t.stis,1 sIrr 1 F HAF 1 E E I % T E DE%10.01 fiII.1.35I 760 L trt beran ChUrCh DRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET AS EXTERIOR ELEVATION A9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1 0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION All EXTERIOR ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARSHITEOTS LLC 12645 STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-331-1,GO FAX 651-430-0150 WWW.NAFARCHITEOTS.COM S , I S GIVH,.Tr• HAF I:L k 1. I- I., \ 1 I. • ReNDenlit46: • , 4•attrma'.4-'#,, -10f MICHAEL HOEFLER 24211r1 013-049 MGH VCR HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE C lssuE OAR SMELT INFORMATION: TITLE SHEET TO EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF wr 4LL IO4z I. MOOLM PACE ORM MN V2. RUMBA 5060 YPIFI CONCAVE JOINTS 2 WA 5. WA 4. 2' LIMME R7QPAGE EPEE CM 5. RAIN 52E01 FARM PM OPEN JOINTS COLOR TO 88 SELECTED 6. PR poser o METAL. PIBGIA 7. V2. GCFPGSI7E ME . SOR1T O. PRISINT96156 Nevi. STAM06 BEAM MCP PARES REIN 56419 !PACED mow 00.1RN A65OOA188 6.A@R46E 1 /RIM PAGE OP BRICK-\ Ainirt.,5#14. (C42Era.144552g811 TEDPL52b' 0P Y44..L (624C, HAMMY) ir4r OF ERICK OIL 0- O R APPR8161A1E SRD STREET 02. •'-1221ALK 20. ER124 COMM WARTS • E- 17P-0' 2. STQ8 51L.L 22.E RICK 60LD21l CCIRtE 2L MggR Me WARM MHO. 24. MPRO6 STREET EEYA110N a. STEEL. PM MORAL 26. PATIo 21. ELOPED L41'0I LANIIOCAPS PLAN 26. CONC. Ez1111Y8R 51128 24 ROGPKE CONCRETE MMONRY 50. PA M EMK/ ARONRY CONTRLI. JOIM' 51. 8C42151 WV. UP GMT. - PRQ71PAe 1ETAL PI1d546 'lOP® OVER IMAT®11200 SLOGKW 91 x-25911V4.L GONN. PILE 26106 AR SALE Y 041 ea. CITY or STILLYNT®4 CONOCTE CMS ETY mess) 94. CITY OR STVIJMTER MACXTOP (Sr OTHERS) SS. Y C CPE E BLAB 14PR0061 NMI I SORE ROOK TO DRAIN MAY (40IOAmi6 mew 56. CITY OP 010.U4ATER IE154196 POLL 97. 66154188 LL64006 WOKE ER. MEMOIR 0164404E O E 4,64 144x MORT 191'O P • i M®5420N CLAD MRMTECTRM. 1RN521- ES 00800E b. 4NNI0 ANJ.M6114 91DorPR0l4r - 9@ 008811E II. MIL 8AM C.01 Y'505124 PITH 11546005 1 II001015 BS WORM 1 DSTMLS 12 RA0100804 PM8 JDINT- T7NCAL 15. DA9PD LSE 110ICA12 }ODO . LOdV1ED 611N04 AREWBL 14, CAST IN PLALE CONCRETE 5524 I5. 0A00 LIRE 16014668 CONCRETE P0041100 - SS POL4l0ATION PLAN 6. COIPoVR PAM 1955A rt. RE1AR1D 61NLL PKE 5R00 M roRESRORD / OR8KK4ROIL 10. STEM PPE WARD RM. / OR MCRAE ©© 7'7tlYgROOP 1 PROPERTY LINE • g-(32�.6L -E1N7.1 R z11pP9-otylls 'w 7�TD4L'Q Pvu_ 4 _115.1Nweg. /vopi 0645626 EL- IOAQ '4 �N]PO' CTM'-07 4- ARCH ITECTS HO1FLSR ARCHITECTS LLD 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 "V STREET H U N T£ A LAKE 5LM0, MN 55046 P H O N E 6 5 1- 6 5 1- 1 7 6 C FAX 65 t -490-0 t 90 WWW.HAFAR6HITE676.G014 TEHIRIM GI F'FICE SLOB TIMM= Se MYRTLE STILLWATER. NM nBNEEICTA ITTIMIMINET I HEREBY CERTITP T14T THI• MAN, SPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED AV ME OR LINDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TNT I AM • OUT LICENSED ARCHITECT TINDER THE Laws oc MC STATE OS MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑8-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE C ONCE: THE DESIDxs sxowx AHD DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDI. ALL TECHNIRAl CRANIA.. GRAPHICS. ANO MODELS THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT BF COPIED, DIATIMATEO OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED. IN WHOLE OR ted ARCHITECTS. THESE APE AVAILABLE FOR LOWED RENEW AND EVALUATION EN CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS. AGENCIES. VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONT TN ACCORDANCE ITN MIS NOTIRS. C COPYRIGHT PAF AlICIIIITO6 MOS. AP PIPITS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: ELEVATI O N AB ATION W3M'•ILO' EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND $1EpLPI T-4p•"" $1ETL}IICWAb'71G $ EL bi' H/Y OP PNLL PITPI OPEEI LIS $ Er1054 $ �loo�d'(141'-07 - G.1R0' (146'-0' a PM®. AREAS) ""a,— $ 047-1' M6' $7 ''O """ — — L PCIA IRE 1YAGE ERICK NTHi1' RAEIMI EAO IIIM COICA& JOIIIT5 O. WA A WA 4. 2' LIIlSTOe ROCIPACE EOM CAP S. RAN SCREEN PARES NTH CP S.DOO5 COLOR TO R MIMEO 6. PREPIHISRD MTN. PAEGA 1. V2 =RIPOSTE PANEL SOFFIT A PI@7NI9ED perm. 906112215 SCAM ROOT P8881.8 NTH SEN EI ACED 17-0/4 0 . NTH AESOOIATE0 PI.,`4DRO 4 TRIM POLO CAST@11S NVEREO I CLAD AROHMICI /W. MUM- WE WHERE! IO. NCD= NJMPLM 511TR9'RAIT - 5EE 5AIC4(E II. STEEL BEAM CANARY 5y10a4 /T M TIE-R000 4 ERA.1215 SE 5RLTION3 I OETAJLS 12. RAN WRIER PANEL JOINT -T'PION. IS. DASHED UNE INDICATES NHCO16 LOWED WHIN ARE PI L 44. CAST RI PLACE COW.Ie1E S185 2. 0601 LEE INMATES CONCRETE PL1711NO8 - 5G' PaWATICM PLAN N. COMPOSITE PALE. FAWN TI. RETAINI116 WALL RACE ERCI1 OH POR05RGVb 4 OR EACKERCUND IS. ann. PRE d 868 RAIL 4 OR ILMORAIL DAME IIIII MOONS MEP GA*@HNT K APPPDXMA1E IRO MST GRIM • 3OEMLK 20. ERICK C8.RSIN! 9TAR15 • B_ TYNER 2. 0TO2 9W1 02 ERICY. SOLDIER COIN 05. NOM 9TOe RETARW PULL 04. APPROX. sneer ELEVATES a 51m PEE M IURASL 26. PA110 27. SOFRO L+V $-08 LMO0CAPE PLAN 76. GONG. WSW! 5182 21.R 11090! COCLTE WEARY SO. PACE ERICKMAEONRY CONTROL .DINT 9. SCAM PW1.44P CONIT. - Flm9N9m lETAL PJOI1N6 5LOP19 OYE47REATEO 2 8CO EIOCKIIM 112 Sled NALL COOT. NCE ERCK 2R>SPACE 6' 2ILJ M. CITY OP SIILLYMTER CONCfe12 CLR5l2Y OTBR6.1 54. STY OP 55I1.116A18t EL/CKTOP (SY O 11000) W. CO1G1e1E SLIM WERROOM NNW EL OM F1.010 TO OMR AMY fro L.OADRI6 AREN 56. CRY OP STI LPU268 RUMPS MALL 01. 0,1680R L16611516 '!.ONCE 50.2OERIOR SIMMLE 111111111111111= TANNIN IIIII 111111,..100r11 ■■■ _ — n I �11� TI ■■■■ 11C L i t I►1Hi�u 1 -=-611111111111_=a MAMAS 52RIIPROM5 �ql� O• Y4N.I. JA}PR�OX .91.7�10N HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T" STREET ElUiTE A LAKE 6LM0, MN 5504.2 PHONE 6 5 1 - g 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 65 1 -490-0 1 ElII WWW.HAFAROHITEOTE1.6001 PROJECT: STREET OFFICE ElLID. 7,1 MCP STI LI—WA TMERT�E , INNES OTA DESIGN REVIEW T., Am A OD, LICENSER ARcHrrEcT SHEER-0E LAPS OF THE STATE CT MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑0-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE C NOTICE: THE E[&GM6 SHEN I AND DEscRisEE HEREIN THEREOF. ARE PAoPPIETAR, PPP EARNED BE CORE, DUnIcATED OR CCIIINERCRUp ...Loss, IN wHoLL DP NE ARCHITECTS. THESE PM AvAILARLE ESA LOWED ACRES AND AccaRDANIE wpm THIS HOTEE. coPTRIGHT HAF ARGWTEDTS ODOR. ALL RENTE RESERVE. ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: ELEVATI 0 N A9 ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION — KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF irrA Tcrvb• CP MALL 1r ZIjiL MOM OPENINGS �[ ENWENTITDM OP CANOPY 111 7pP RiPb�pFL. wNDg1@'sC4,2531:N:» M o_ a 1- I 0 I. MODULAR PACE BRISK $TN VT R1NNM COW 141N CONCAVE JOINTS 2 WA 0. WA 4. O' LINEST4E ROGKMK! Ease CAP 0. RAIN SCREEN PAWLS PORN OPEN JOINS COLOR TO BE 0. PRSINSIm NTTM. IAGGA 7. VX Ca OSTIE PAM. LOTT 0. PIQ1914S4ED PMTN. 9TAW1111 SUM ROOF PMO.5 F41NI SEAMS SPACED I1-sV4' 0L. IITH A69001ATED R.AONWS 4 TRIM 4. AHD=GM CLAD ARG#TB0ILRAL MOOR - SEE SOMME 10. ANO047ED MI.MNM STOREFRONT - OEE W.N91LB IL STEEL BLW1 CV4ITY SYSTEM PITH T04440D9 4 BRACKETS SE EEL:ONS 4 DETAILS 0. MIN WREN PAIe. JOINT - TYPICAL E. WOO, LEE IIOK'A7®MP400146 LOCATED MIME MIEMGL M. CAST N PLACE CONCRETE STEPS a. ammo LEE INDICATES CONCRETE FOOfINSE - SEE Fg110AT1014 FLAN M. GMOSRE PAWL MEGA rt. RETAINING KW. (PACE BRICK) IN POR•1R END 4 OR BACKGROUND ID. Sim. PPE GUARD TEAL 4 OR NAPORNL MED CASEMENT K APPROXIMATE MD neer 4RA0D G 5En4N1.X 21. MCA COMM* STARTS • EL. 971'6 ]I. STOW SILL 02 ERICK SOLVER COME 2. ANC1011 MTGE REUNINB PLML 24. APPROX. STREET ELEVATION A STEEL PIPE N4ORAIL ffi. PATIO 01. ELOPED LAMFCS LMOSGl9 RAN 2D. GONG. EXTERIOR STEPS x ROCRPACE COMP B ?AVOW 00. FACE BRICKRY64RY Ga. i1W. JOINT SI. SCREEN PV1.L CAP WEST. ••• FREFEISHEP METN. ISAs4NB ELOPED OYER TREATED BOLO BLOCKONB 02 Weal PULE. WEST. FACE ERICK Mt WAGE iv au S0. CITY OF Sf1LLYNTER GACJCTE CURD ON OTHERO 04. CITY or a9WN1Be a AOKTDP * meta E0. IP CONCRETE SLAB P4ERCOM PNCN SLOPE MOOR TD DRAB AMY (TO LOAOIW AREA) 06. CITY Or SN1PM70X RETAINER', MALL 67. EKT9POR LEWIS SCONCE 00. OtT1000R SN14432 11111111 1111111 D 111111111111I111= 111111I111IIIII III III A :�. E 111 1 1111111 11111111111111 1•I ■it ■_■ ■! I I1111111111111I11 a IR N G TT OP DOUBLE HMO MOONS d.OH-O'r. g:BE1OPY r-1 V V V TpP �� di4EOr B- 09CC' war. et- (104 ') 17.00R Y inammosp ARCHITECTS HCEFLER ARCHIT£CTe LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T11 STREET a L I T E A LAKE 6LM0, MN 5504E PHONE 6 5 1- g 5 T- 1760 FAX 65 7 -490-0 1 80 WWW. HAFAR0H ITECTa. 0OM HERO S OFFICE EiLOI3 ti1RO 6aTMYRT E SI, I —WATER, MIN N ES CITA DESIGN REVIEW NHAXI I HERESY COMO THAT THIS KAN, SpECIFICATION DR REPORT WAS PREPARED WI ME OR CHICO MY DIRECT SUPERWSION AND THAT I AM A MAN LICENSED ARCHITECT IRMO THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER • 24210 ❑8-049 MMH MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE C NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SNDwu AND OCSDRiGED HEREIN MODELS THEREOF. ARC PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED, DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT OPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION Or HAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARC AYAILAIRE FOP LIMITED REWEW AND EVALUATION cucKrs. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS, AGENCIES. VENDORS AND DEANE PRRSONNIEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WIN: THIS NOTICE. COPYRIGHT HAF ARCM,EDrS COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: ELEVATION Al ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION — KEY NOTE LEGEND HAF A MAIN LEE:. PION APF?IECSS W Y EEL IO6 -Q 1 L PDOLLAR PAQ BRICK PEN ICE RIME& BONO MN COIDAYE WINE 2 WA E. WA 4. 2' 1JME6TCIE RCY.+E•ACe EOEe CAP E. RAN SOREN PAGE MN OPEN .DINS COLOR TO BE 6. PR8`NBI49 FETAL FASCIA 7. III' COM40617e PAWL DOR1T A PRC0XE4CD PETA. STADEM MEAN ROOF PARS PITH 9E446 N.ACt4 11404. AG. MN ASSOCIATED Nd12466 6 TRIM O 1. M40Ef90N CLAD A6bMECTU AL P1110T- EVE BCtcuE b. AID 4920 AJ41414 STOImTONT - SEE ECJECAIE II. STEEL BEAM 4AN7PY 9Y9TE4 MN TE-1006 4 BRACKENS SEE ECOTONE 1 =AILS 12 RAN BOOM PANEL .814T - ttPKAL m. DAMIDD LIKe EDKA6 NIDOPE LOCATED MINN AT W ELL 14. COOT N PLACE CONCRETE SIB'S D. DAMPLEE EDK.ATEE 00440681E POOTNNE6 - SEE FOUNDATION PLAN Y. COPf 0911E PM42- FASCIA IN. MANN* MALL (FACE CREW IN PORBER000 L CRB CCN6046D D. WW®. PIPE 6UMD RAL 1 OR NAPPRAIL PETAL OH DOC7L I4. APPROWMATE END EMELT 611.401 • e10044LK 20. BRICK 00(R704E STAINS • EL TERD' 21. EPEE ELI- = BRICK 90L01EL COARSE 26. AMOR STOWS WOMBS MA. 24.ATROK IETREETEI2✓ATION 2E. 91Ei PPE IL111RA1. 26. PAT O 27. %GOLD LA4/1-21S LMDWPE PLAN 26.001Y DTRRIM STEPS 1i ROCq'AE CONCRETE MASONRY BOO. AL DOOR oar NM 91IX61 51= ALLMNM ETGIQ11gR O BO. PACE EREK/14660)RY CONTROL 61241 EL9OENMILCA" CORE. - FIEFIN9N9 PETAL KAMM &O EJ OYEt 774141E7 WOOD ELOCKIN6 S2 SERE N MIL GONER. PAGE EPICK FR S►AC6 e, cl1l EE. WY DP STLIPHTEL 0044068 E CIRB DY anima) R4. CM OP ST01PN1E6 BLACKTOP E91' Oren) DR 9 WHOM! 8AA AMMON PEEN ELOPE PL068 TO ORAN AMY (TO LAWN* MCA) W. CITY OP SRLLPNTEL IRTANNS MLL ET. ENTERER L EWES 900440E E0. IDCMOAELAOE SI6N PEED CASEMENT! O 0 0 O 0 O 0 oERL{�c-- I b bb.716 TpP y[� �TMGLj�I iraar Rg0RPOO1IN65$ ARCHITECTS HOfiFLER ARCFIITECTB LLC 12 4 4 5 55.r. STREET elt iTE A LAK£ SLMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-651-1760 FAX 65I-.490-01130 WWW. HAFAROH ITEOTa.00M I-11R0 STREET Op -FIGS SLOS HIRE H STI LLWATER, TSAINNEs CITA O SSIGN REVIEW I HEREBY CURS, THAT THIS PLAN. SPECHICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED I, HE OR UNDER MY MEET SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT WIDER IIIE LAWS or INS STA, CH MINNESOTA. mit MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 C B-C 49 M M H M G H HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE C NOSE: THE DESIGNS SHCNIN AND DESCRIBED HEREIN THRREOF. A, PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT IIS EOM, DUPLICATED EIR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITS, IN WHO. DR IN PP, STINE, IMPRESS SSTS RSIIssim Dr Heir ARCHITECTS. THESE ARC AVAILASLE BOR LIMITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION BY CLIENTS. CONSULTANTS. CLINTSACTORS, ASENCIES. VSNOORS AND CEASE PERSONNEL WILT IN ACC0POANOE WIN THIS NURSE. G. COPYRIGHT Mr ARCHITECTS SOUS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVER ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR ELEVATION All IOR ELEVATION 3/32'. I'-0' D6-17-2009 • THIRD STREET OFFICE BUILDING ABBREVIATIONS A PAR PARALLEL AB ANCHOR BOLT Fs FLOOR DRAIN A. AlsoVS rot, FOUNSATIoN HBO PARTIDLE soARD AD ACOUSTICAL FE FIRE EYTINGUISHER pC PkEGA. coNcRETE WC Alll CONDITIDNIND FEC :IARmELT,TINGUICHER PERF PEPFoRAT,43, AcT AcouaTicAL TILE HER. ITERILIETER , PLATE A0.1 ADJuSTABLE FFE FINISHED FLDDR AFF ABoVE FINISHED ELEVATION Pa- apoPERIFF LINE FlOOR ENS FIRE 110. CASINET ITLAN ELASTIC LANINATS AGO AGGREGATE FIN FINISH.. PLAS PLASTER ALT ALTERNATE FL. EL.11,1LL PL., PLUNBING ALUM ALUT,INtan FLO ,ABHINO ,F P.c... P. LINEAR FOOT ANCH ANDHOP.ANcHoRANC ELI, FLOORS,. PNE PANEL AP ACCESS RANEE ,u0R FauctRESCENT POL POLISHEISIEDI AHED AD..,Ku FR. FRAN.. <IN. pix 1,1. AppROX APpRoximATE , FOOTIFEETI pREFARPREFABRICATE.1 ARCH ARCHITECTUTRALI Ern FOOTINCI PRES P.... AUTO AUTDMATIC FUR FURRED. FURRING PRO., PROWETIoN Full. EDI,. Avs. AvERAGE SSE ROUNDS PER SCluARE FOOT FVC EIRE VALvE LADINET pal PouNDs PER SQUARE 16., B G PT .1.74E01 STD PAPER ToviCEDIZITLN6. a':Lrva :=N EIALv 12ALHANITEC, ,N PARHT10.4 DEv ...L. oc 00000„ 000„....,o,,00, ,R P.P. TOWEL RECEPTOR •vO pciwItyyL cHLT3RIDE =1 n7,7017.°' op GRADE BRADING NET SASKETIEDI pL TED PL.,21110 oT nrrElln 24 SCI:=11=C7 0 OT THIARRy 'OLE 1:Ro BEARINIE H CI, SUANTI, ::HT HFATEKNENT HOSE SIBS R :7. =7:::',2—, UNIT 'i'LL NoLLow LoRE. HANDiewmpED, illw NETAL. RAD RADIUB R. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN C = =:=:l RE RooF DRAIN REV SEVINION. REvIsE101 RE. REDEPTACLE g' ffRAN"ETnuAlm "s"' :=17;` REEL REFLEENED, (WEI REG RESISTER HEIGHT PLINF REINFoRcEIDL UN, RED. REQUIRED RH RIGHT HAND C'1:C C'1:CCULYIFERENCE ''''''''' ..'''''..".'71;t7='"f 7:1:E1 raaLITIONs HER EuNuTE l'T ::::::::Gtr" 'TZCI l'17Dr:A^LITIC RO pouGH opENINS EL DENT. Li. I ELS CEILING ID CLO CLOSET SOUTH IN ral="S"'"' SAN SANITARy INBIELATElol. Go. CO cLEANEST INT INTERIOR F- :=F00,FEED Co. COEFF,IENT Li Come con•INAmoN COP. COMpREsscEDLGENT T7' ''.,:7,17 IT: r.,..a. ENID SANITARy HARKIN 016,11SER COP, CONCRETE K cc Ir. I N' cCo'r TN te.i'c'c'T ro'N' l'F'Or Ke=uT SO. SDLIARE. BE ...NEESE STEEL CONST CONSTRUCTION .1. 00/0, claNTINUoLIS oR ' =co, LAS CONTINUE :TM, :=ITE, srRucTuRAL Cow CARPETIE01 ER 'PO'LlAt1:171 susIT SUSPEND, ...REND.. sy DERANIC TILL l.-174;17,' ;.0. TZ;:"L .. , CUBIC rooT HEED EIH Cu yo CUBIC YAROtal EE EI7.,76. =F. it'l:E7AZGE Cw COLD HATER rcin"r TM. TERIPAELIT D LTO TX -7=7.117"' 0 LifniT';a" C,13 g::XELISI CIlltr DEPARTMENT LYLIT =1,0, NAN NA U = :I:: ,:airmY UNE. UNEXCAvATE0 L LABORATOR. ,7,::. :=7. N.H. NECHANICIAL, 61ED. LIEDIDEI .1.1.,.:4,0 N,L,fr,s NoTE0 DTHERwIsc v 01V OWISION HER HANSFACT,G,RT ,Dl ',.7" rry71,17Sr''' ON COHN IE. WHIM., VET Vrw.:EnuiP136.1130N TILE F.V ' :: 'wet trIlLro7EXIN G ...,.ovE rn. v " VESTisuLL 12'gw:u '''OTiE747"T PITO MOUNTED ,,,''' V,NyL TILE INTL 'FETAL vwC YIN, WALL COVERING E muLL EILHLION E EA EACH N I C NOT IN CONTRACT :1 ::1Z" ..1..-E.0 ELEETRIcIAL, Wo Wools :7'17. :',.'ll'ISTE.I'Ll'FiEl No Numic. Clay ELEVAToR :176. ',12r,":t.,... ro'w V,Z,°Z, o ENG ENGINEER IDA OvERALL ::T Zli'ST:E=707H.T' oc oN cENTE.:4 . ED. EQUAL vd:wF :.:170"E'D WIRE EABRIC COull. SQUIPHENT :We EN.C71.:1 wATER C0131-. 13•No DITENING yR WAS EXIST EXIsTING EXP. EXPANSION ExT .1.10P LOCATION MAP St s..tik ia ,otiti 5t. i ,a it nj5t.;.; l• is z z u Stillwater .4 E 5 z , = - t--- -z- -1- st E - SF. 00,SN . . .. t °*'• , ' % Z. . HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE - D COLORED ELEVATIONS DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 12445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-1760 FAX: 651-430-0150 CODE DATA A AppLicauf LE suiLD/N0 cop. 2007 HINNESI3TA STATE BUILDING COOC AMENDMENTS INCDRECIPATING THE FOLLOwING. 2006 INTERNATIoNAL •L,ILDIND 2003 ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2006 INTERNATMINAL FIRE CODE 2006 INTERNATIONAL PrEcHANICAL CODE 2003 MINNESOTA sTaTt PLLINBING CODE 2003 NATIoNAL ELECTRICAL co. CONMERCIAL BUILD.. ENERGY CODE 2006 INTERNATIONAL MI. GAS cODE 6,13.3 DER STORY 3,737 Sp. FT. PER STD. PROJECT TEAM Love. Transform. Serve. . trinity Lutheran Church ' . " • ' „E„,„,,,„,„.„,,,„,„„„.„,r, ; C.: st-sti ..., al 0i116 D-111.1A1 Hill. MINNI.st at 1,1 \I I'1 \II III \ I I tP1.111 \ I DRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET CL 1 COLORED ELEVATION CL 2 COLORED ELEVATION CL 3 COLORED ELEVATION CL 4 COLORED ELEVATION ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECT. LLC 1 2445 55. STREET Sur -re A LAKE ELMO, MN 55043 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651 -430-0 1 BO WWW.HAFARCHITECTB.COM 1,1 \II I 1111' \ I MICHAEL HOEFLER 34210 08-049 MGH 0 000001001 MAT oucuraces 23. Au. bars Freuven IssuE EILBCRIPTION SHE, INFO TIALlow TITLE SHEET TO HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCH,TECTS LLC I2445 5S" STREET SUITS A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 551-430-018O WWW.HAFARCHITEOTH.COM Sr ....:;v" (,.,.. , -,... , .1/4-.. „„ I ,==,N•H r.7.1 1)1 X 1.1 III' NI I \ 1 MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MOH 00P0NPt MAT Moo,. SOOT AIL maws mrerevro DESCRIPTION COLORED ELEVATION CL-1 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLO 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 '^ STREET SUITE A LAKEELMO, MN 55043 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 551-430-0150 WWW.HAFARCH ITECTS. COM Sr M IC HAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MGH on ISSUE DATE DEscAlATIom COLORED ELEVATION CL-2 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLD 12445 55'" STREET SuiTE A LAKEELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351.1760 FAX 651-430-D1SO WWW. HAFARCH ITECTS.COM II 1. \ I. 1 . I \ I 1 ■ 11. 1 LI.111"ii'.\I" RENNERINIR MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 00-049 MOH SSUE DATE DESCRIPTION COLORED ELEVATION CL-3 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 45 55" STREET 109iTe A LAKEELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651-430-0180 WWW.HAFARCHITECTS. COM � ep II 1 \ I. 1 . 1 \ I. L. 1\I1I; \II:\T MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 00-049 MMH MOH ISSUE DATE COLORED ELEVATION CL-4 06-1 7-2009 THIRD STREET OFFICE BUILDING ABBREVIATIONS A F ANCHOR BGILT ABOW FLOOR DRAIN FON FOUNDATION ACT ACOUSTICAL TILE CABINET ADJUSTABLE FINISHED ;Loup AFF ABOVE FINISHED ELEVATION FEIC AIRE ROSE CABINET A. ALTERNATE FLEX FLEXIBLE A:ITUM ALUMINUM NCH ANCHOR, ANCHORAGE VTR FLOOR.. FLO FLASHING. ACCESS PANEL FLUOR FLUORESCENT POL. POLISHED.. APPD APPROVED TR. FRAM...11.31 PR PAIR APAR. APPROXIMATE Fr FOOD,. PREFASPREFABRICATEIER AUTO AUTOMATIC RAR FURRED. FURRING eRna PROJECTION An-vO. AVERAGE FUT. FUTURE PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT FTC FIRE VALVE CABINET PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH 5 QUPENSER PAR PAPER TOWEL RECEPIDR Et. BEVELED P3.4 PARTITION P PL PLATE P.L. PROPER, LINE PL. PLASTIC LAMINATE BUILDING BLKO oQ RLYW WDDQ R. BRRKM R QUANTITY OTYQUANTI CEILINGEISLIT BASEMENT RISER 83 BOTH RCP PERECTE0 rHO NEAR LAN Q BRITISH THERMAL UNIDES T PIPEQ,CORE RD ROOF DRAIN CAS CASINET HEX HEXAGONAL REV REVISION. REVISE.,CAP CAPACITY RECIA RECEPTACLE NM HOLLOW META1. cc. GEM - Co CORN- -Apo Hp -PO- HADMR HOUR CHAN CHAMFER HT HEIGHT PLINF PLINFORC.31. WIG/ CM CIRCLE RH RIGHT HAND SW HOT WATERRPM 116VOLUTIONS PER MINUTE CJ CONTROL JOINT HYDRAULIC ECL CENTER LINE COMP COMPRESS...4.N/ CON.. CONSTRUCTION L LENGTH CONTINUE LAB LABORATORY CONTR. CONTRACTIOR1 TAM LANINATE1D1 CORR CORRIDOR LAT LATERAL CPT CARPKTIE13/ LAV LAVATORY CS COUNTERSINK LO o COLD WATER L P. LOW POINT LT. LIGHT MR LOuvCR INFO INDONNATION TINT INTERIOR JOIST JANITOR K OINr DEPARTMENT 'IX:KLING FOUNTAIN CIA DIAS DIV EA. EACH EXP. BOLIDZW.IS,1.0.1.4 BOLT ELEV. ELEVATOR ENG ENGINE. r.L"T= WATER COOLER EXH EXHAUST EXIST EXISTING EXP. EXPANSION EXTERIOR iKNOCKOUT MAN MANUAL MAS MASONRY MAX MAXIMUM MECH. AIEC„ANICTAL/ MEE. MEZZANINE HER MANUFACTURER, 101 N N NORTH N C. NOT IN CONTRACT OUTSIDE CIAMETER OH /717EZLIEAD 5140 SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SNR SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE SPEC SPECIFICATION SO. SQUARE T TEMP TEMPERATYRE TERN TERRAZZO TPD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER 114,:E1 =Z. NOTED OTHERWISE v V8 VINYL BASE ‘1.4';ST VESTIBULE VT VINYL TILE VWC VINYL WALL COVERING WERT WT HEWN, WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIE YR. YEAR LOCATION MAP Q1 HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE - E PICTURE SUBMITTAL DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 12445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-1760 FAX: 6 5 1 -4 3 0-0 1 80 CODE DATA A.M./ALE BUILDING CORES 20.17 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING COPE WA ...OMEN. INCORPORATING THE FOLLOWING. 30133 I...NATIONAL SUMMING CODE SODS ACCESSIS1LITY CODE 10. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE GODS IN.RNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 3001 MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING COME 0003 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE COMMERCIAL 1.1.14411 ENERGY CODE 1006 INTERNATIONAL rust_ G. CODE B. 8E1.10 ZONE C. OCCUPANCY CLASSIVICATION D. CONSTRUCTION TYPE F. ACTUAL AREA G. ALLOWABLE NO. OR STORIES ACTOAL NO. OF STORIES 9,00D PER STORY 3.737 BEL R. PER STORY PROJECT TEAM W 11111 Love.Tians orm.Serve. trinity Lutheran Church So r t\ I1�k:IN:\ at mom; /;1111I't\l'L '.111.1.11 1 III. 11155.S011 LlJ I0I.1MLpilm r{ I; I. \ I. I - 1 \ 1 I ■ III \I II"II \I DRAWING INDEX TO TITLE SHEET P 1 HIGHLAND STONE RETAINING WALL P 2 RAINSCREEN PANEL P 3 SAMPLE BOARD ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 12445 55'x STREET SUITE A LAKEELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351.1760 FAX 651.43C-019C WWW.HAFAR CH ITECTB.COM I..,. t. (Jj� � Lt E�1all4 uuuncalarl\7 '. �..� e1IIix1,1.R_xI�L1 �n1 �� I. I 1 i. 1-. 1 \ I ■ 1,1 \I.11:11II.\' MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ CB-049 MGH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE E Ell DATE DCSCRIPTION SHEET INFO RATION TITLE SHEET TO HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLD 12445 55K STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651•43 0-0 1 BO WWW.HAFAR CH ITECTS 2014 ' 41.1 11.111111,1 il[1.113EPING' MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-134,9 MMH MOH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE E Mg MM.-a 1.1,14•TICTS 2008 .4. •10.-Vra areentea c rallnlon EXTERIOR RAINSCREEN P 2 RIOIR RAINSCREEN PUS. �'I)YF/I)arol HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 1344,5 SST" STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 631-430-01E0 WWW. HAFARCH ITECTS. COM 1`\ ()(% j /7, INAG L.,' Dili 1,l';1.1=Irnl IIAF 111. \1. 1 . 1' \I I MICHAEL HOEFLER MOH HPC SUBMITTAL PACKAGE E 00.0001T HAT MOTHS' 2000 ALL WATS name.. ISSUE Daic SHEET SAMPLEBOARD P 3 SAMPLE BOARD Stiliwater ' H E B I H` H P i. A C E E f- M; N N E E O 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: h �Y, r 2Q09 July ?, 20 )9 APPLICANT: Marc Puliiian CASE NO.: 09-04 REQUEST: Design Review of an amendment to the Liberty Village PUD for Architectural Review & Design Guidelines. LOCATION: Commercial area at the intersection of Manning Ave and CSAH 12 (Myrtle St/76th St W) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CN - Neighborhood Commercial ZONING: HPC DATE: June 1, 2009 July 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner VC - Village Commercial Changes fro the J ie 1st o are in legislative format arid are highlig tec DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review approval of Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village. The request is two parts; first, this request officially adopts the design guidelines for the Liberty Village commercial area, which were inadvertently not adopted by the City. Second, it revises the sign and graphics section of the original guidelines and adds•several new types of signs that can be used within the development. SPECIFIC REQUESTS The applicant is requesting design review approval for the Liberty Village Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village. In addition to design review approval by the Heritage Preservation Commission, the applicant will need approval from the Planning Commission and City Council of an amendment to the Liberty Village PUD. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 2 JUNE 3rd ACTION BY THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION At the June aid meeting I IPC reviewed and discussed the request. Due to concerns raised by neighboring residential property owners the Commission elected to table action on the request and requested staff meet with the applicant and effected property owners to see if a compromise could be reached. JUNE 9th NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING On June 9, 2009, representatives for the applicant, the Residential Townhome Association, the Liberty Residential Master Board, the HPC, and City Staff met at City Hall to discuss the proposal. Related to the Residential Townhorne Association concerns the applicant proposed eliminatingjhe tight pole banner signs on the southeast side of Settler's Way. With this eliminated the residential homeowners were in agreement with the proposal as presented including allowing two pylon signs along both Manning Ave and Myrtle Street and permitting roof signs., EVALUATION OF REQUEST The original Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village took years to develop after numerous meetings. When the PUD was officially approved by the City, the final Architectural Review and Design Guidelines were not included in that approval and subsequently were never adopted by the City. The original Architectural Review and Design Guidelines are appropriate and raise no concerns for staff. A number of revisions are proposed in the area of signage. The January 24, 2003 draft Architectural Review and Design Guidelines was 22 pages and the proposal before the Commission is now 39 pages with the bulk of the changes in the area of signage. The following are highlights on changes that are proposed: Item Applicant's Request City Staff Comments Branding Plans to incorporate a uniform marketing theme for the development No comment Master signs Up to four "master signs" (with two along Manning and two along CSAH 12). Allows 75 sq ft of signage up to 20 feet in height. BP allows up to 100 sf of signage with a height of 25 feet along Highway 36, 20 feet along County 5 & Greeley, and 6 feet in all other location. CBD and CA allows up to 30 sq ft up to 6 feet tall. Freestanding project monument signs Up to two freestanding project monument signs (three possible locations shown in the guidelines). Allowed to be 25 feet tall up to 100 sq ft in size. Other project development signs have been limited to six feet tall and 100 sq ft in size. City code would allow only one sign for this site. 4. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 3 Item Light pole banners and bracket signs Applicant's Request Allows the Liberty Village brand to be incorporated on light poles with banners and bracket signs City Staff Comments City permits general banners to be installed on light poles in the CBD. Residential area has raised concerns with placing signs on light poles along residential areas. Building directory signs Allows up to a 12 sq ft directory signs, either attached or freestanding. BP district permits four sq ft for building/project name and one sq ft for each business. Wall signs Allows 1 sq ft for each linear foot of building. Sign area measured around letter + 3 inch margin. Cannot be higher than the parapet or 20 feet, whichever is lower. When combined with roof signage, this would provide twice as much building signage then what is permitted in any other district. Roof signs Portable Sign Allows 1 sq ft for each linear foot of building. Sign area measured around letter + 3 inch margin. Cannot be higher than the parapet or 20 feet, whichever is lower. Permitted Roof signs are currently prohibited by City Code. This would set a new precedence. Second, when combined with wall signage, this would provide twice as much building signage then what is permitted in any other district. Third, the language would appear to allow a business to have both a roof sign and a wall sign. Finally, in multi story buildings roof signs it is not clear if roof signs would be limited to upper floor tenants or if alI' tenants would be permitted to have roof signs. Portable signs are prohibited by City Code. Portable signs are temporary sign that typically have changeable letters. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 4 Item Applicant's Request City Staff Comments Temporary Banners Permits up to 4 per year for 90 days each. Applicant's proposal allows temporary banner to be displayed for up to 360 days per year. City code currently allows for 3 per year for 30 days each for a total of 90 days per year. This could result in a number of banners hung can each multi -tenant build] ng year round. Sandwich Boards Permits sidewalk signs and follows the Downtown Sidewalk Sign Policy No comment In staff's opinion, the request has the potential to "over sign" the development. The proposal before the commission is more liberal than what the City permits for signage in the BP zoning district, which is the City's most liberal sign criteria. As a neighborhood destination shopping area, this would seem a little extreme. Certainly a case can be made for additional signage along Manning and CSAH 12; however, it seems appropriate to have signage for this development fall somewhere between the City's standard for business park signage and neighborhood commercial signage. The proposal provides no cap and would allow business to have a building sign, projecting sign, free standing sign, projecting sign, and banner. Reasonable limits should be included in the proposal to keep this site on par with other commercial districts in the City. Finally, the proposal attempts to address each and every sign type within the City. The proposal should be limit to traditional permanent building sign and specific exceptions to other type of signage. Signs such as political, address, construction, real estate, rummage sale, and other similar type of sign should simply default to the general sign regulations that are in place for the entire City. • Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 5 ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives that can be considered: A. Approval. If the proposed guidelines are found acceptable to the HPC, then the requested design review should be approved, with the following minimum conditions of approval: 1. The design review approval shall become void if the PUD amendment is denied b\ the City Council. 2. Light pole banner signs shall not be installed southeast of Settler's Way. 3, Any sign on City property shall be approved by the City Council prior to installation. Any sign on park property shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council prior to installation. B. Denial. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not acceptable, the request should be denied. C. Approval in part. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the 3uly-6August 3, 2009 meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is July 13, 2009; however, staff can extend this for an additional 60- days. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 6 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. In addition to the TrliniMLITTI conditions of approval listed above, staff would recommend the following additional conditions of approval: 4. References to banner signs shall be removed from the PUD amenchnent. Banner signs shall follow regulations for banners sign permitted in other areas of the City. 5. Roof signs are prohibited. 6. Portable signs are prohibited. 7. Only one pylon sign shall be permitted along Myrtle Street and only one, pylon sign shall be permitted along -Manning Ave. design review for the requested PUD amendmc attachments: Applicant's materials Proposed Design Guidelines 502 Second Street, Suite 301 Hudson, WI 54016 Phone: 715.381.8291 Fax: 715.381.6829 marc@putmanplanninganddesign.com TO: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Mike Pogge, City Planner, Heritage Preservation Commission Members, Planning Commission Members, Members of the Stillwater City Council and Mayor Ken Harycki. cc: Liberty Village Business Association RE: Liberty Village, Planned Unit Development Amendment, Stillwater MN DATE: 17 April 2009 At the request and authorization of the Liberty Village property owners and tenants, we are submitting the following Planned Unit Development Amendment. This is primarily an act of "housekeeping" for the Liberty Village project. We have also modified the original draft version of the Design Guidelines to incorporate important new information gleaned from marketplace performance regarding the signing of this unique commercial property. The recent ordeal of reconstruction of Manning Avenue, challenged Liberty Village. Thus, business owners saw this as an ideal time to finalize and update (with six years better knowledge) the Liberty Village Design Guidelines with clarification of the Overall Signing Plan (See pages 13-30). A BRIEF HISTORY In 1997, the Concept Master Plan for Liberty on the Lake and Liberty Village was presented after hundreds of meetings with residents and regulatory agencies. From that point, to 2003, when the Liberty Village Preliminary Plat was submitted, the site size, building sizes and positions were almost identical. The initial, and continued goal of the Village is to provide the convenience shopping, office, dining and gathering opportunities common to the traditional neighborhoods of our past. A full copy of the original PUD Narrative is attached at the back for your review. For reasons yet unknown, the Architectural Review & Design Guidelines were never officially made a part of the Planned Unit Development. Although unofficially, when known of, the Design Guides were used for all of the buildings constructed in Liberty Village to date. This PUD Amendment will officially make the Design Guides part of the Liberty Village PUD. Page 1of3 THE UNIQUENESS OF LIBERTY VILLAGE The Liberty Village site plan established a different approach for the store designs, one not common in this era of "strip commercial" shopping. While the site does front on two major county roads (12 & 15), the stores also orient inward toward the neighborhood. This "shops on the green" approach, while steeped in history, presented new challenges in balancing the walkable convenience to the adjacent neighborhood and the vehicular convenience to the county arterial users. In terms of signing, this means the site acts as an arterial commercial area on one side, and a walkable commercial area on the other. Please consider our initial observations regarding signing Liberty Village, and the starting points from which we began writing the Liberty Village Design Guidelines: 1. TND (Traditional Neighborhood Developments) commercial projects have, on balance, not done as well in the competitive marketplace as strip malls... their prime competitors. From the language of the Village Commercial Zoning Ordinance, in order to "provide a local center for convenience shopping and personal services primarily in proximity to residential neighborhood", it is first necessary that the businesses be able to be and stay profitably open. This, of course, requires customers gaining awareness of, and being regularly reminded of, the "convenience" shopping. These requirements for success depend on visibility to the customer. Such identity and visibility is the life -blood of any retail/business/ commercial enterprise, but to small businesses in particular. This grows even more critical, when the shops and services for such a "village" will typically never benefit from regional or national advertising & public relations campaigns. Shops at Liberty Village are locally owned and managed. 2. Regrettably, Liberty Village's site plan was not approved with a forward -looking signage plan, to help overcome its (then -unknown) inherent competitive challenges. 3. The essence of the idyllic form of Liberty Village's "shops on the green" site plan "turned" some of the businesses away from the life -blood customers traveling on the perimeter highways (Hwy. 15 & Hwy. 12). And, we did not know, at the time Liberty on the Lake and Liberty Village was designed and approved, that the added costs of TND development, construction and marketing would need to be offset by added identity efforts, advertising and higher profile signage presence. There was not sufficient signing experience, at the time, with the "models" from other regions that helped guide Liberty Village's design. 4. What we now know is that, whether shopping is for "convenience", "personal services" or others, the vitally needed customers are on the bordering highways. And from that route, they are using the same eyes and attention spans, independent of whether it is convenience shopping, or big -box shopping that needs to be noticed for the businesses' financial survival. If regulations demand that the TND / Village Commercial stores be minimally visible & signed primarily only to the customers "in proximity to the residential neighborhood", then these stores will perpetually struggle, and suffer high tenant turnover. (Numerous Liberty shop operators report new customer comments to the effect that "I did not know you were here!" ... after these customers have driven by for years.) This is the last thing we wanted and the last thing that should be allowed to happen. If Traditional Neighborhood Development (with sought-after municipal advantages of calmed traffic, distributed parking, an emphasis on pedestrian use and positive aesthetics) is desired by governments... then such dedicated, note -worthy efforts should Page 2 of 3 willingly be provided incentives for the added costs and marketing challenges. 5. Strip Malls are designed to show off one of their building facades most visibly to the highway -traveling customer, often with low-cost, less attractive backs and sides. Their internally lit signs draw attention often to single entry points and single frontages. Strip malls also prominently position large tracts of parking in prominently visible locations. City and neighborhood aesthetics, the local shopper and the pedestrian can suffer. 6. What we've come to realize, (for Liberty Village and its similarly -planned fore- runners), is that the more subtle but more costly architectural forms, multiple entries, hidden / distributed parking and more extensive planting can screen and confuse the customer. If such TND's, (with their greater community -building Sr aesthetic potentials), are ever to flourish and find greater market acceptance, then the inherent marketing challenges must be counter -balanced with more visible, but well designed identity / signage. 7. The reality is that Liberty Village life -blood customers are traveling at 2 kinds of speeds & distances: mostly Fast and Farther, and then, once attracted and within Liberty Village, Slow and Closer. Thus, to provide equity to marketing appeal ... the signage size & quantity must be geared to both customer -perception "settings". For highway speeds: larger & taller signs, well lit ... For local vehicle and pedestrian speeds: somewhat smaller signs, still well lit. (For each; well designed, perhaps with the eclectic flavor of Downtown Stillwater, with a historic & strong design influence... as conveyed in the original Design Guidelines.) The above experiences and realizations have formed the basis of our Liberty Village Planned Unit Development Amendment. To our research, Liberty is the most awarded Minnesota planned community on both a national, regional and local level, for planning, amenities, identity, signage, environmental design, and the homes. The bridge & trail -connected school is prized, the home values have been protected, and many other neighborhoods have been inspired & enabled, based on Liberty's design principles & superb execution. The last challenge for each of us is to learn from our experiences, the experiences of others, and put in place the mechanisms so the dedicated commercial vendors and users can see the success & enjoyment that the rest of Liberty has experienced. One way or the other, the high -profile nature Liberty will continue to instruct many planning & design professionals, for years to come.... that the final details & approvals matter as much or more as the original, much applauded, concept. We appreciate your review of the PUD Amendment and look forward to the continued commercial and neighborhood success of Liberty Village. Respectfully submitted, Page 3 of 3 PLFI IvJAN PL,AINNING DFSIGNLplat LIBERTY VILLAGE PLANN' UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT MAR sun PLAN HARKAT3V . LANDSCAPE,11. f'YII-i Y',f:-I II'•P' I '.AI? nryulni... NE1;.;t1 HDOti, F.ES I15ENTI C1V C E;VFFSYr"t., E.ai,C+,*r' T.y',RiAPtl?^6E:161‘1 To ee REGARDING NIIGI IP>ORHOO rD MUNICIPALITY LATE Mr, Steve Russell, Director of Community Devd u:twat, City of Stillwater Joint Bd. Members, C'PLX ARC, ACC Members, Newman Rlty, Kwik Trip,' 1st SI-Bank & T. Planned Unit Development Application Narrative, Liberty on the Lake h1Iwetef, Mn, February 28, 2003, Revised March -5, 2000, March 2,5, 2t103 L[BFITY VILLAGE 1. CONSISTENCY OF PLAN FROM FIRST LIBERTY ON THE LAKE CONCEPT SITE PLAN: Liberty Village was integral with Liberty on the Lake's master site plan from the first lines drawn on paper, 'the Village was conceived to provide the COnverdence shopping, office, dining and gathering opporhuuties common to Traditional Neighborhoods of our past. This, to strengthen the cohesive and complete mature of Liberty's neighborhoods, completing the intent and content of Liberty's original land plan. From the 1997 Liberty Concept Master Plan, to the 200Liberty Village Plan, the site size and buildings sizes- and positions are almost identical except for changes required ley traffic engi- neering. The stows are so much a part of the fabric of this planned community that they were made part of Liberty's Logo. Liberty Village was also designed in response to the Cit r s Con'pnthensive Plan and Zoning Plan , providing a much needed and carefully- positioned local source for fuel, convenience groceries, bank- ing, dining/pub/deli, office and professional services for the city, township and cx-nnity r sidcetts use. The village Stores will reduce internal: resident traffic burdens on perimeter highway interactions. This is a side benefit of serving resident's local, daily needs for purchases ,,errands that, otherwise, would burden Liberty homeowner with the increased inconvenience and ever-present risks of longer drives on busy, higher speed roads for "convenience" shopping. These efficiencies and neighborhood benefits of Liberty on the Lake have been recognized locally and nation-wide. (Research indicat s I:iberty has received more Regional and MtHerett planning„ design and smart growth awards than any other Twin Cities planned community in history.) One of the rea- sons for these awards is the integration of pedestrian friendly shopping into Liberty's land plan. 2. 'SHOPS ON 'I'HR VILLAGE SQUARE": Liberty Village's site plan calls for store designs not com- mon in this era of "strip conunereial" shopping. While the site at Liberty on the Lake' t Northwest cor- ner fronts on both highway 13 and 12, the shops will also orient "in" to the oom mini ly i neighborhood. This places added tasks on the design of the buildings and individual shop owner/operators floor plans, not unlike some stores in dmvntown Stillwater. plpr I. int Ntircli �, Lao; •ti-a.1:r.:,,F .n -trlr,n. P,1r.ttr, Sp.+.cep: Sea arrrlr. 0.;4l4r4r.4 .{>s=rK.rs CTirri LIZi; :: GE5K.Iti C1n t: 4,19 :n�tid tit SuWA ace. Nujson. WI 541316 t phone: (71a l)tsict4 L;FI Pvt gins Ri4entlau I)ftra, r4, FigilanAr 1V15101A r JiiidNal 91 • tii^t ,`Ft1 iSKO. • Fhful Infra PulrnmsPla This inward focus, however is not unbuffered, Realizing, at the time of the Pint concept plan prepa- ration (in 1993), that cnnimercial uses can affect residential Lifestyles and values, I aborty Square... a large village green is :sized, positioned, improved and planted to provide both transition, separation, and ... connection. 3. -VILLAG1 COMMERCIAL ZONING: The Village Commercial Zoning Ordinance, passed same 5 years ago around the same time as liberty's Master Plan approval, sought to govern two potential types of development -those without a Planned Lnit Development approach, and a development plan using a P.U.D. The foster. of course, carries the typical, more aimpligie restrictions. This, because the city has much less design control than under a P.U.17. The language of the last claw of the ordinance no. ea; (section ,5) states; -•rhrsc dexeJL rn,cnt rrxtzatremcnta may be modified txt9vil 14.11 ;zit acmptable plannezl Milt development for the entire village commercial district ar " allows (and therefore enables and motivates) much more freedom of innovation, use and quality to be woven into a land plan and its buildings. We believe that Liberty Villtiage's plan, the work of CPDC and its Architectural Review Ccrn'amitt1e, and its first two buildings, display the faithful and continuing commitment the C_PDC team, and demonstrates the wisdom of such an ordinance approach. 4. CIRCULATION SYSTEM: TWO WAY ROADS, ON -STREET PARKING, TRAFFIC CALMED: liberty Village's site plan and, in particular its road configuration, has been extensively studied. Over 21 alternate Liberty /Liberty Village concept road plans were drawn, early on and exhaustive- ly reviewed. This, before the preliminary drawings were provided to both the developer's retained traffic engineer and City for review by their traffic engineers, The plants were debated, ret'iewcd, re -reviewed and refined numerous Litt e Much attention was focussed on a road design that would not invite, nor enable short-cut traffic, to avoid the intersection at I Iwy.1.2 and 15. Numerous design tactics and Lords were and are employed to calm the village commercial traffic. For example, the many "T" intersections, required turning movements, the angled road intersections, the "not -fat streets", the on -street parallel and angled parking, the fn'queney of intersections, the presence of boulevard trees andsidewalks„ the closeness of the buildings to the curbs, the positioning of attractive park features in driver'8 sight lines, the paving changes at frequent acts walks —all these combine to compel a lower spayed limit, to impose traffic calming; effects, while helping; create a PLACE_. What drove the planning w<ae the goal of, cat*biting a safe place for kids of all ages to walk or bike to the store & back. '10 our knowledge, no shopping place in the Twin Cities uses these tools to the extent employed at Liberty Village. Intersection locations on both highway 12 and 13 were al --so intensively reviewed by the 0ananty Highway 17cpartment, as was the modern round -about, School House Circle. In fact, the County cre- ated new access restrictions and applied them to 'Liberty Village:. The City's traffic consultant, in joint meetings with all parties (including the repro• entatives from the School district) analyzed all available traffic data. 'Phis overlapping regulators; approach resulted in the number, lanes and the intersection controls at the highway access points to which Liberty and 1.berty Village now connect.Traffrc capacity studies were prepared by the respected traffic engineer- ing firm of henshoof and Associates and subsequently reviewe.d by the C ity's consulting traffic engi- neer (s). This included trip data that was; generated in conjunction with the comprehensives environ- mental s tudies done to understand the impacts of the cite annexations along Manning Avenue. pap z. The County's requirements for future highway improvements and trails was also made part of the development mstrietions and requirements. These regulations compelled the added width of right of way, for Hwy. 15. This, to enable expansion to multiple lanes and other improvements anticipati'd by the County Hwy. Dept. Of course, the schedule of these improvements to Highway 15 and 12 and their intersection lies whol- ly with the County. As with any pudic. intersection or road upgrade, the concept of "warrants" are employed. In short, the -addition of stop lights or extra land; is based on what is warranted —needed. Prudence in the use of taxpayer dollars for road expansion requires sufficient need, to motivate these improvements. 'ibis need is found in "level of service ratings —basically, the length of time it takes tc' get on the higher volume road, or thru art intersection: As the average wait times increase, everituat- ly, the i npmvernents will be designed arid constructed. More highway 15 & intersection improve- ments am scheduled by the County As is deal -from the foregoing, the roads and intersections of Liberty Village are as much a result of the City and County Governments as they are the Plasrnees or the Developer's. We have been steadfast, however, in promoting what industry and professional standards alike would sere as this bast solutions available. 5. NOISE: In planning Liberty, there has always been awareness regauding the noise from Hwy. 12 and particularly Manning Ave, Hwy. 15. The area served by, these roads is large, and the threshold of traffic volumes 11741.5 reached long ago, sufficient to create a noisy road. The pretence of a stop r ign, or future stop lights is and will further contribute to the noise, independent of I" betty, or Liberty Village. Anyone accomplishing their "due diligence", anticipating, the Larne investment in a home at Liberty's north end had ample evidence of the traffic volumes, speeds present and noise levels prior to their purchase. Thera are two effective metho€ie of reducing traffic noise: one is tcrbarrier homes with solid masses, such as larger buildings, and the other is to plant large trans. liberty Village's land plan does both of these. The overlapping massing of the buildings will help shield the town homey and detached homes from much direct "line of bight" sound. And, the extensive planting planned, particularly the boule- vard trees planted, on average, some 40' to 50' on center, will attenuate more vehicle noise. 'Phis proposed planting, as with virtually every other meaningful features within I.ibcrty on the Lake, and Liberty Village, far exceeds the minimums under a standard zoning approach The grocery and fuel (Kwik Trip) more was located and positioned to screen both highway noise and primary 9tcire activities from Liberty Square, must Liberty homes and the school. The pump location and orientation of the main store entry mean that all fueling activity and most store patron's activity will be to the highway side of the stare. 6. THE CAR WASH & PUMPS: In the earlieg Liberty Village land plan, the car wash tit'as positioned and designed to screen me st of the view of pumps from Manning Ave. As intended, the architecture and detailing t'cihoes the look of early New England covered bridges. The unique deeply rec`.c:ssc'd entry and exit doors assist in the exterior design and help limit noise. f' 14.n l i'.i. +�'.ta4,FT Both coniferous and deciduous tree and shrub planting on the isiand in front of the exit facing the townhomes along Settlers Way will also attenuate the noise of the car wash. The planning commission discussed specification of the dryer brand, with lower noise levels as being an important lesson learned on another project. The unusual feature of the Vivo -sided buildings of Liberty Village turns the 'Liberty Square side of the shops themselves away from the highway noise. Our hope is that residents and visitors alike will be drawn to this setting, designed to be a slower paced, quieter, shops -on -the -square gathering place. liberty Village's original concept plan showed a similar canopy and building size as the current PLED proposal. What we have learned during spedfic design refinement is that because of the high percent- age of "drive offs"... (people who leave without paying for gas), the orientation of the drive isles has to face the attendents in the store. This refinement had no impact on the aesthetics or scale of structures as originally intended. The pumps are still largly scrc-terteci from view, the lighting is recessed and there are net back -lit, bright ad'ierising panels high in the air. The roof over the pumps has been lowered .almost 4 feet from standard canopy heights and redesigned to "fit" with the New England architecture of the main grocery-mnvenience sure and the adjacent shops to corne. 7. THE RESTAURANT & LIQUOR LICENSE: As Liberty on the Lakes plan evolved it became appar- ent that for the foreseeable future, Highway 15 would come u0 repress tt Stillwater's western bound- ary, This factor, blended with and supported our resolve to create an outstanding community addition to the City. As the sole commercial location on this western edge, made so by the City's zoning ordi- nance, it is important that its viability be assured by both careful selection of the type of businesses present and in providing the freedoms that their competitors enjoy and that they need to succeed. Building in Liberty; and Liberty Village is more expensive. The high d►:sign standards and oversight imposed both by the 'RLLD. approval process, the Architectural Review Committee, Architectural Control Committee is resulting in more c.'trstly cr:rnstruction... and we believe a beautiful addition to the City of Stillwater. The City support has had a lot to do with this success.. This Masi phase of Liberty...) ,itiertyv Village is proceeding with the same level of commitment to quality as the developer, Hooter Tompkiias, Contractor Property Developers Company has demonstrated in the neighborhoods of Liberty already created. The goal of long term financial viability for the businesses invited into Liberty Village, (that are wil- ing to pay for, and carry the cost of the design quality) is most important. A liquor license is a key to to enable CP17C: to attract the highest quality and most experienced restaurant owner -operators and help assure that the significant, central and highly visible restaurant/deli/pub location sustains suc- cess. The initial and continued success of the shops and stores at Liberty i4 important to all of Liberty, on several levels. We all want to see Liberty Village become a vibrant, civic gathering spot on Stillwater's border. So do others:... over the years there have been many Liberty home prospects, buyers and resi- dents who've come into the Land Office wondering:" when will the restaurant and pub open?". raj 4. Tr-N.M i rc h u, 7.1i o ; 8. THE POND IN LIBERTY SQUARE: With the sigtific:annt recent refinement and approval of the Storna water runoff volume calculations, the central pond within Liberty Square lags been relieved of most, in not all of its storm water storage "duty". This mean' that the pond will be able to have a more atabk water level, that is just 4 feet below the elevation of the perimeter sidewalk and street elevation This, and the use of boulder walls will allow the water Surface to be brought closer to both the gaze- bo/pavilicn and the sitting area south muss the street from the bank. A floating. lit, fountain will help provide water circulation and aeration helping to clarify the water. The water jet will also add visual focus and be an attractive amenity, drawing visitors to both the park, pavilion and the bordering shops, 9, ANTICIPATED USES OF LIBERTY SQUARE:: The master site plan uses Liberty Square to both separate, buffer, but also link the "shops on the green" front/to the homes, towwnhomes and the resi- dents. The grading and position of the pavilion/ gazebo anticipate a variety of City park uses and functions. The large open irrigated turf area, hi addition to being an attractive, tree -lined park, will provide ample space for informal audience seating during musical group and performances. "Plea" market, farmens' market uses are also potentials. We understand that the City receives requests that it ettn not fulfill with current park locations. The gazebo pavilion will offer shelter for park users and performer;;, while benches and gam tables, both under and around the shelter, will also allow for casual daytime and evening cientveraation over- looking the pond and water fountain to the north. In w+inte , there is a potential for this structure to provide shelter for tee slaters. The retaining walls and steps to the water will permit winter ac xs s for this skating, and in summer, could allow activities such as model (radio control) boat/sail boat races for kids of all ages, 10. BUILDING DESIGN: Because each building must face both the perimeter and provide a welcom- ing "front" on Liberty Village, the Architectural Guidelines require each owner/business operator to respond with plans and designs and operati ono] activity that is compatible ,ii rid supportive, of this goal. 11. SHARED PARKING for CITY PARK USERS: Parking space quantities and ratios include the use of on -street spaces shown on titer site plans. Liberty Village is a stand-alone Village Commercial area without the likelihood of expansion in size. From the initial concept plans, the sharing of parking :-pace Was always anticipated... between commercial users, employees, park users and residents (if upper level residential uses are provided). 12, LIMITATION ON' BUILDING USES: To help assure sufficient parking of those who drive (and park) to use Settlers Park, Liberty Square and the adjacent trail system, Building 8 will be limited to office use, day care tis (within covenant restrictions), and potential upper level residential use. poten- ti.al_ May -Aug_ limitations on hours of operation nway be put in place as needed. This, to provide suf- ficient week end parking spaces for City Park usera. 9. BUILDING AREAS: Square Footages are based on Liberty pillage Concept Site Plant and Prelim. Plat, and may vary at final site plan and final building plan approval application_ 13. PARKING SPACE RATIOS: Sufficient, convenient parking enables customers to patronize busi- nesses, Ratios of parking spaces per 1000 square feet of lidding area required for categories of build- ing use (ie. 5: 1... 5 spacetr per 1000 sq. ft.), will conform to City -required amounts; the most restrictive ratios being the refail ratio of 5:t and restaurant at 10:1. Where office or residential uses are planned, a method., acceptable to the City, of restricting the por- tions of buildings, (or whole buildings) so designated, will be part of the final building approval. If time limit and type of use limit is acceptable to City, applicable parking ratio(s) (that may be lower than the generalized calcination (its., 5 : 1) shown on the Parking Data chart) can be applied and modify allowable building main and upper floor areas. This information -mast then be hart of .subsequent pur- chase agreements & Association proceedings, 1.4. ADEQUACY OF SPACES, PROOF OF PARKING" DATA: We .rnuwt have enough parking. Yet, we also should avoid having too many parking spaced, fur the size and types of uses for the buildings and owner -businesses. We also want to "build-iit" the flexibility of building design, features and suf ficiency of parking to enable a variety, of businesses to succeed at Liberty Village, over time. The parking ratios, (and, therefore the parking space quantities provided) are conservative, for they apply (per City Standards) to gross floor areas, not the common net'leasable floor areas. We propose, that, consistent with the I'i!1) criteria of the Village Commercial zone, if Sufficient and applicable evidence shows that less than the number of spaces specified in the City's general ordi- nances are actually needed to allow the specific business to operate properly, then choices canbe con- sidered: 1. The number of spaces required will be reduced for that particular building, or 2. The build- ing floor area can be increased, or, 3. Another pmximnate building may be increased. in size, by using the surplus spaces. These potential increases in building size will not be allowed if they compromise the aesthetics+ o ational flexibility of the sidewall<.r+ and streetscaipe. l.r- 15. EMPLOYEE PARKING: Employee parking will be designated, and shall not use any on -street parking spaces. This, to help provide an ample supply of short tern parking spaces to encourage patronage of I.iberty Village businesses, accessed from the Liberty Square side. 13. AGREEMENTS FOR JOINT USE OF PARKING: While some spaces for each building/business operator will be reserved via agreement and signage. most spaces will be open to all wens, as is com- mon to most suburban 6hoppiug settings. Purchase agreement clauses and "Liberty Village Biunines Operators Association" covenants and guidelines will identify mutual use agreements covering park- ing spaces, openspace use, maintenance obligations and City -Association maintenance and use responsibiiiti, park reservation mechanisms,, etc. 16. SIGNACE, REFUSE ENCLOSURES, TIIAIL.S AND IMAGE: Liberty Village is bounded by trails on both the north and west sides, and the master site plan anticipated connections to these trails, lead- ing into Liberty Village_ iN to; ivicic7.,3u? 1 Other functional. necessities of a cO,ntunrdal village include the need for sufficient signage to inform the primary buyers (those drivers passing by on'.'faruning avenue and Hwy. 12) of the services and products offered within Liberty Village, This is particularly important for Liberty Village since it is try- ing something new to, the contemporary corm rcial market place.., stores that face both "in and our. Aware of the lass than attractive settings that can restilt from straight buildings and straight rows of parking backing up to a highway, we have sought to design interest and visibility into the plan. Using the refuse durnpster enclosure -garages as another opportunity to show the Kew England architectur- al style, the plan shows these structures flanldng the trail entry. A trellis element with sign identifying Liberty Village offers a trail gateway. The surfaces of these :struc- tures provide inou rating for in -character signage, identifying bus sses, servis s and products. Picket fences attached aid in screening the cars parked beyond. Other locations for signage, consistent with the Liberty Design Guidelines are designated on the site plan. Agreements for the shared use of these signage locations will be integrated into the owner/ oper- ator and Association agreements, 17, PLAN'f1NG PLANS: The perimeter planting provider} both screening of parking, overstory trees, and openings to pie rve visibility of the shops and business,.. Along both external parking bays and around Liberty Square, boulevard trees are provided to create an attractive "Train street" scene. 18. FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS: Final site plays may be refined to include added parking space;, and/or future potential, additional spaces via diagonal parking, added retaining walls, etc. Building footprints may vary from those shown on the site plan but not to the point where they limit future sidewalk (;eating) uses and flexibility in marketing. Such refines' ents must meet into t of Architectural Guidelines and receive Architectural Review Committee and Architectural Control Committee approval before City, A.pplicatioes. pow: '. L, I 13 E R T Y VILLA E PARK IN G D AT A BUILDING BUILDIN(. POTENTIAL NUMBER LAND IISES 1 ,ri Lfrtitt'/tl it[ I,:li FLL?,Yrt MI slice 'Si 0:I rl.i F_Ih1f• `iU. 'tom = 4,m etA tr. 6oat 5 cleated fiat: �, E. P.wT 7:G li ,1II D ti• p• i� F.l'Fr.l'. S.FACES rP❑41L_'_'' 20 FIAT CA .firl Dfl? 5.8:1 13UIL0INC3 I1. c 55I1II'vcL O Lit IIl c'Ff7 r k c r_ L 11. 51 c A SI 4 ',. 5 11 4,120 na 4,120 +$,` It ry lf•% 20 nfirar{tp BUILDING —` 2 I FI'.F nFI li[ rU IIC+I L}\I )I'Illr,+; lti 41.347.• ,9c5 0.240 030071 15,166- 18,295 brat ii riwst FWo.: . �t 741 to BUILDING 3 Pr l 51.} 1L 1 ? +,If i I.r f. 51 ,T ::I Ii'J f•� rfi RI Ic.wrira Lit 4.1 n'r%at r6lal, 0110G$pl, me. BUILD 1NG 4 OFF If. r .1I','ICI- I'ktYl' -SSh0 al.. I.EI 111..j 4,850 Ctt't na +{,8.50 ivy‹ r ;cl 1 t at3 +�# 5:1 13 U IL. 0 11,4 G Ft,,I.tr 1 +'IT, M 11. 5 r,_o. t. 11l utr.k re oath}N.i 5,458 na ria 5,458 10 1 a$ 11.8'1 BUILDING OFFIC I ;l'ICL. F;, 1 L, aLrL1L. 6 +I 11 ,\IV,.- L.41 IONS 2,080 - 2,080 4,180 r+T, 5'� ;: i•` lot t<1.ayxt nt.' 20 22 5,3:1 5; 1 BUILDING crii 1lkF F.FNICF. i FR 1, DIFr 11 ^., f OF' Si 2,400 2400 2,400 0 0t0 P.M 5 r. Y. 4N R �1'lpi1 24 24 Irt 1{ BUILDING. L LI^,it.4 8 rRUF S 1 I`..1L I .11 r c, r n+„' �,�'Qi3 $� %r a co 11,400) tAki Lp 4'i''. v., 'a . t ' ii v 3'� ,�7-1 to 3' ' 1 Liberty VitlE-13e totals 32, 573 43,854`- 53,083* 251 nw xr 4dArryrr 1fiCITE.a••1.SeuuareFao4gesarcba!ruianLirm^.•StfageCorrect :ale Fiala trot FrAM,Pt&erdarmy ,,veytitIlnalafter plan n11dfrtuNlLa110161plprlapproval appiiaadan, 12,Naid i mega rarontarm:ft uses'rfi totot Tl RI1 Gly- m7Jred ar en15,the e,tt rxti:H,HrA'!ra Crfrgd'c rapt ranidG:1ea-d tirAtKlt al 1?:1: pelcrkory articled ky'mar cl ''ilkry':amifutthtiYa«>z(N+Til=uhrcrlcpbalera.'tt,erut cilk* idt,R.1 fa3ERaial:res arc pu-nr3, a miblCd ft:04101tm la the Ciyt ae reglIcitrigitiewititd3 IVl 17o,(er'Mtnlo tali• nosy scdesrarmled.'ailIto ttorrhr:I alapFrr.al.!mac ctmob thnrkhiL}:FMikeri*)can em'eJated4siti.f lMille lanikeD rcnaa) Faring ra#k>a ape caxarvahre, tat IIr4rj ap iy ,:ocr iy'^.IareaMsl4o gaea 1* sraa, art twl rear cream . P,1r9+r'ry ipaeo .:pirrrlks and mix, Inpu-Ja i.-u bail $461*0; s1C M o't Ilia ale Flan. LLrrly 'eSih.}a a a slanalam .il u r Carmercal area 31urP0 i( piOt1,0 spaces Is alklyt Aed teAVknrl tdmnrw:ini Oner*, n:rFlerte +, Fat Men; are reekerra QI n,kitr level re*[eaal vet a am roAided). Ekitiv*J R k11 tc #mled to aim dxi cam 1watiu C0anret tosIdalenak arxi {ralerlty up ec teLei r 1rb11)a1, Llaytu,g. Iranians cn ham a' c48,01011004 !XI put In dam. as famed, lc ;Fri 5n1 Yad4 end pond -coaxes farc5typenk Meth. s'mplvsso: *.vk- kit Rm dcoOrgter, and elilte a4 err:! iltal :r:t ILac:ry rx. s`•• et. rark1•i# ecaa1M S.;rot Oro 'ION row! aerelined teliraldenrkdgrluUt'f.4s:t9 and.arMare paterral.ad,llinealnowaa1aclalaandpa:fyryaddedrttakingr,1W61,MTa.aurhnilnererdsmetMee:itihrt •rdoircHlaoWel ;die#ramtirrireaeve!r-r±eCC_rlRerlaNt.x.o-g`ner,..arealrhmectrrlCalm'Cifn'tiV4Aftrfratafara : .6aalizetkrra. r. nurohrarru-reern:r'I ;iw.aza af5i tro:Alacelo,a h axvlbn" O, ris and4'1uta tur as !OP Matti:rLiva UDCsarameriscsrea9 pttkiin] er'AN'a• [Fen=i marlen-rr» :NTts:cas and ClIf-A*;adarcn eatteran:e am vac lMigt'tl}4tlea. FvM resenVlrJ1 rneti1 not, ea.:. LifERTY Y11.1 A..CE PARKING 0.11111. MARC I'17TklAN, L Afi-1. i'l tIVAta TR g1•41Ni & L'+€Slr„1 % ODD .- I)1, P46.24Xr33 R€Y. March d, 203 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INV ft Irattleltltrnitin II" an qi111113:111 00- 4 it4V ?ito,1 iffr r-s ,i's111:" A Planned Unit Development Amendment Architectural Review & Design Guidelines f3r LIBERTY VILEAGE Including Building and Sign Guideline Criteria. AT Stillwaters New Small Town Neighborhood. ORIGINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL: March 14, 2003 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL: May 20, 2003 April 17, 2009 Liberty on the Lake master site plan. Architectural Review & Design Guidelines, including Building & Sign Criteria for: LIBERTY VILLAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Objectives 4. Approval Background & Process 5. Building placement and site considerations 6. Building Massing 7. Building Fronts 8. Building height 9. Roof design 10. Franchise Architecture 11. Building Materials 12. Detailing 13. Screening of rooftop equipment 14. Utility areas 15. Lighting 16. Signs and Graphics 17. Awnings 18. Colors 19. Parking 20. Bicycle parking 21. Streetscape elements 22. Landscaping 23, Management Concept Liberty Village Site Plan provided in previous master plan and park design city submit- tals. 1. INTRODUCTION Liberty Village general development plan showing revised road and parking alignments request- ed by city staff. Page 4 Liberty Village consists of approximately 7 acres, in the northwest corner of Liberty on the Lake, Stillwater Minnesota. The following design guidelines and per- formance standards shall be observed, in addition to the requirements as applied and approved under a Planned Unit Development for Liberty Village, under the Village Commercial District Ordinance Number 830. It is the aim of these guidelines to maintain quality site planning, architectural design, landscape architectural design and construction in adherence with the Liberty on the Lake Master Plan and selected design theme. The Architectural Design Committee shall use these guides to evaluate specific commercial site and building positions. 2. GOALS •Create a high quality "country village" consisting of neighborhood services and convenience services for commuters using residential scale structures. •Create as a gathering and meeting place for local resi- dents. •Use building massing, detail and color to emulate the impressions gained from the illustrations of Wysocki, Norman Rockwell, and The Field Guide to American Homes by Virginia & Lee McAlester. This setting and style is known generally as colonial and includes vari- ants of English, Adam, Classical Revival, and Colonial Revival. These styles evolved in the New England region and from this point forward in this document will be referred to as "New England." 3. OBJECTIVES • Ensure buildings have complexity at a human scale, which can be enjoyed at a pedestrian pace. • Buildings should help define Liberty Square by fronting on this main social gathering space for the neighborhood. • All buildings should represent a consistency of mass- ing and detailing on all four sides. 4. APPROVAL BACKGROUND • The visual impact of one or all buildings is to not be the standard strip mall and or free standing stores surround- ed by parking, facing the highway, with blank wall/util- ity enclosure to sides and 'rear". Rather, the approvals Canopies and tasteful, decoratively shaped & edged signs help inform and entertain. © Charles Wysocki Larger windows, awnings, varied roof alignments, canopies, and bracket mount- ed signage create a visually interesting place to be, and a place to which people will want to return. U O u One & two story buildings, which favor roof dormers, provide A.R.C. the © essence of New England style buildings. given by the Stillwater Town Board in or around 1997, were based on the verbal picture that follows more less from this quote made in the pivotal Town Board approval meeting: "But what if the buildings looked like a (New England) country store", with gas "pumps under a roof that looks like a covered bridge, screened from the road by an in - theme building that hap- pens to be a car wash", with a country doctors office... And all build- ings front on a village green." • The approval came with the idea that the Board members' dislike was not for the "What" of the commercial use, but the "how" it was usually done. Each saw the positive value and convenience of the services being close by, but their resistance was due to a precon- ceived notion of how commercial buildings, parking and grounds 'always look'... would look. The problem was, therefore, not the "what", it was the "how"... how the buildings would be positioned, massed, detailed and signed. • The underlying family partners/property owners, ancestors have owned the land since 1849 when Liberty Newman and his father gained homestead title to the land from the U.S. government. His grandfather fought in the revolutionary war; a Newman daughter married a Dows son, son of the man who rode, as did Paul Revere, to alert the country side of British military actions. Acquaintances from New England, the Masterinan family, also came west and set- tled across the road from the Newman farm. The Masterman's rela- tives owned property next to the bridge in Concord, Vermont, where the revolutionary war began. • The street, New England Way, within Liberty Village names the theme of Liberty Village architecture. What does this mean for the plan and design of each Liberty Village Building? • Adhere to the spirit and the letter of the guidance of the concept and preliminary site plans that obtained the approvals for the con- venience store use. • Buildings must face both the highway frontage and the parallel parking & sidewalks bracketing the Green. • Design floor plans that cause the stores, offices, businesses to ori- ent to both Liberty Square and the perimeter road frontage and bor- dering parking. • Side walk seating and recessed accesses should invite drivers and pedestrians from the Village Green side of the buildings. • The desired aspect of added in-store security, gained by views into the stores, will be served by customer activity, presence & movement from the Liberty Square side of the building and perimeter parking areas. Proper pedestrian access and windows facing the sidewalks and parallel parking on the green will encourage and enable more of the desired customer access and visual scrutiny. Decorative facade, cornice trim of frieze, crown mold and symmetrical, paralleled window positions. Decorative, formal, themed signage accent simple building elevations. Charles Wysoc Page 5 LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC STRUCTURES.. . Right: Liberty's clock tower shows the stone/break off block in limestone color, red brick, crown mold details, and roof cupola. LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHI l'hCTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT A 3 n'f Left: The booster pump building shows materials of red brick, white trim, a cupola vent, nar- row overhangs, & wide frieze. Heritage Square's gazebo (behind the mail structure) uses tradi- tional doric round columns & exposed beams below the soffit & lattice. Above: The walk bridge to school shows the New England detailing of steep pitch roofs, flush gable rakes, & picket fences. Right: The school's architecture employs brick ele- ments "anchoring" the cedar_shingle- clad, gable roof ele- ments. Left: Square columns support steeply pitched roof with narrow rakes & overhangs, bracket traditional light fixture. Colors of picket fence and trim unify archi- tecture of landscape elements. Page 6 A.R.C. GUIDELINES ILLUSTRATIONS AND ELEVATIONS Concept Aerial Sketch: View of Liberty Village buildings north of pond in Liberty Square. Bank is at Right �faic?c�i' Tra-tt! ; 5-'Ave iLU LIBERTY VILLAGE Image Tram L erty Square SALA Architects 8 Concept Sketch Elevations of Building #3 (Office/Retail/Live-Work), and Building #4 (Bank) at right. Preliminary building Elevations: Building #3, studying massing, style and colors, Note New England/Colonial style with steep -pitched main roof elements, flush rake overhangs, symmetrical window treatments, some with shutters. See illustration below for signage adaptations. Signage and Business Identity is critical for success. Appropriate themed sign design, detail and placement help bring preliminary Building #3 Elevation "Alive". Facing Manning Avenue, Elevation drawing shows decorative signs mounted on walls, roofs, brackets and canopies. Page 7 HOW THE GUIDELINES WILL BE USED Any new development, exterior remodeling or renovation of existing buildings, or new signs within the area, will require design review. The Liberty Village Architectural Review and Design Guidelines (Design Guides) will be used as the reference document to assist in the design review. THE REVIEW PROCESS Pre -application Meeting: The owner/tenant (applicant) will meet with the Liberty Village Business Association (LVBA) to discuss the proposed project and it relationship to the Village. The applicant should receive a copy of and review the Liberty Village Architectural Review and Design Guidelines. Formal Application Meeting: The applicant will meet with the LVBA to review the application and the compatibility with the Design Guides. Receipt of the Plans and Project Review: Following the receipt of the final Design Development documents, the LVBA will take up to one week to review the plans. During this period, recommendations may be made to the applicant to enable the application to better meet the Design Guidelines. Decision: The LVBA will make the final decision on the approved design, with any conditions of approval as may be necessary. INFORMATION NEEDED FOR PROJECT REVIEW The following information will be required for the LVBA to fully understand the project and its impact on Liberty Village. Site Plan: at a scale of 1"=20', showing adjacent properties and structures. Landscaping, lighting, grading and drainage plan to the same scale, for proposed new developments/buildings. Floor Plans: of all floors of the project at a scale of 1/8" or 1/4"=1'. Architectural Elevations: of all sides of the project at a scale of 1/8" or 1/4"=1'. Elevations should include adjacent buildings on each side of the proposed project. Contextual Sketches: if necessary to convey the idea. Material Samples: showing actual materials to be used, their color, and details showing how they will be used. Format: for the information should be 24"x36" +/-, with reductions at 8 1/2"xl l" or 11"x17". INFORMATION NEEDED FOR SIGN REVIEW Elevation Drawing: of the sign on the elevation of the building. Drawing to be at a scale of 1/8" or 1/4"=1'. Show dimensions of the sign and the lettering in the style (font) to be used. Materials: call out the materials and colors to be used for the sign background and lettering. Provide actual color samples. If the sign is to lit, show in detail how it will be lit and the wattage of the lamp proposed. Page 8 0 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION .p•-ro rz Rivertown Animal Hospital NEST BUILDING ELEVATION v •ro — Elf ABOVE: Elevation drawings prepared as part of the building project approval and sign review, indicates the general size and location of the building sign program. BELOW: Photos of final signs installed on the completed building. 02003 Putman Planning and Design RECOMMENDED: Varied massing, angled positions, and openings for pedestrians help attract customers. RECOMMENDED: Inset entry, signs on brackets, & larger windows create visual/social interest. Note- Vertical emphasis of design. NOT RECOMMENDED: Tight sidewalk width restricts com- fortable use of dinning tables & prevents sidewalk trees with tree grates. 5. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND SITE CONSIDERATIONS Within the context of separately owned buildings and lots, the structures are to be positioned and connected to create as much "shops -on -a -green" impression as possible. Setbacks of buildings from the front prop- erty line will only be allowed for pedestri- an oriented activities, such as seating, spe- cific landscaping elements or outdoor activity areas. These dimensions can be very sensitive. Anticipating future poten- tial sidewalk dining requires careful antic- ipation of tree grates, pedestrian move- ment, and table placement. Because the buildings also face highways 12, 15 and the Green, they must present themselves attractively on all sides. Pathway or sidewalk connections will be made between buildings, parking and site features. The parking areas must be visually divid- ed into smaller elements via planted medi- ans, islands, grade changes and / or plant- ed berming. 6. BUILDING MASSING Overall architecture and landscape archi- tecture is to be united with a "New England" design character. This style is characterized by an emphasis on narrow and varied width shop fronts with sepa- rate identities obtained by trim, siding and facade changes. Structures are to be relat- ed by this style through individual build- ings or portions of buildings should be varied, with the style colonial "New England." RECOMMENDED: While extra parking lies to the other side of this building, the shops face both a village green and parallel parking out front. Provide sufficient width. for comfortable side- walk uses. The vertical window treatments, and building variety of older main streets, are inspiration for Liberty Village. ©2003 Putman Planning and Design Page 9 7. BUILDING FRONTS Ground level expression and entries: Dis- play or shop windows are provided at grade level to display merchandise and provide pedestrian interest. They should occupy 60 percent of the front facade, and aid in defin- ing the entrance to the building. Windows, other than display or shop windows, should have a vertical emphasis. The design of the building should help make the street enjoyable, visually interest- ing and comfortable. Individual buildings • should be integrated with the streetscape to bring activity within the building in direct .t contact with the people on the street. • 8. BUILDING HEIGHT 1 The requirements of the Village Commer- • cial zone for the City of Stillwater stipulate that principal structures not exceed 2 stories, or 35 feet, and acces- sory structures not exceed 1 story, or 20 feet. Building height means the vertical di- mension, measured from the average eleva- tion of the finished lot grade at the front of the building to the highest point of ceiling of the top story, in the case of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof and to the average height between the plate and ridge of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. RECOMMENDED: MuItiple Levels with recesses, canopies, & sidewalks create interest and draw customers, Page 10 9. ROOF DESIGN Roofs of the primary structure must slope at 8:12 or greater. Porches, entries, and shelters can have flat, 3:12, or 4:12 pitches. Dormers with slopes 90 degrees to the pri- Q mary roof pitch should be 12:12. Flat roofs are appropriate where parapet walls obscure 1 HVAC equipment. Use of roofs for decks, g overlooks, activities, green roofs, etc, are encouraged. Shingles should be thicker butt, zheavier weight, style asphalt in weathered N grey shades or cedar shingles or composite o materials emulating slate. Large expanses of roof should be broken by dormers and offsets. RECOMMENDED: Even at one story height, the use of pedestrian scale lighting, signage, and canopy help make this an attractive place. NOT RECOMMENDED: The facades and columns lack style references. RECOMMENDED: Visual streetscape interest. 1 NOT RECOMMENDED: Mixture of traditional shutters with more contemporary standing seam metal facade addition send conflicting style messages. NOT RECOMMENDED: Flat roof expressed by absence of cornice or other archi- tectural features. Random positioning of awnings and signs. 10. FRANCHISE ARCHITECTURE Franchise architecture represents those build- ings designed in such a way as to make the services or goods sold immediately recogniza- ble through the use of a specific mix of architec- tural design, signage design, materials, light intensity & type, and colors of the building. These were first developed on or near high- speed freeways where taking the time to read a sign would be too difficult. Such designs are generally in conflict with the characteristics of pedestrian oriented commercial storefronts, and a village of shops, unified by a theme. • Trademark architecture is prohibited. 5 • 11. MATERIALS z Finish wall materials shall consist of brick, wood (cement board products allowed - such as James Hardie products), stone and glass. Site amenities, sign base structures and retain- ing structures shall utilize similar and comple- mentary building materials and New England design themes to further establish a unifying visual link between site and structures. 12. DETAILING Siding, trim, soffits, frieze and fascia materials should be of James Hardie "Hardi Plank, Hardi trim, Hardi Soffit" or approved equal, of hori- zontal bevel style , or in limited use, board and NOT RECOMMENDED: Internally lit signs, metal canopies. �(!ff°� .l��Ii&��r uiurie�:�rr��ri�lt�t?lli bA batten, and or shingles. � � �� : , � �\ \ ��, Ts • Masonryto materials should be focused on col-.'..,Irm'°"` 1 ot umn supports, masses emulating fireplace 1 ' F masses, or veneers on building masses repre- — �'o a z senting the "original structure", to which other m • "later additions" appear attached, and of clap- m board siding. Masonry materials can also be N ° used on components and signage supports ° close and visually prominent to the streets and sidewalks. RECOMMENDED:Varied building faces & levels. Roof top equipment is screened. Page 11 { RECOMMENDED: Surfaces made interesting through architectural detailing. Recesses and niches provided to allow customers a place to linger outside. Lighting, integrated with attractive signage sized for the pedestrians. RECOMMENDED: Columns, canopies, and visual interest. Page 12 13. SCREENING OF ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT • Screen exterior transformers and air conditioning units from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a man- ner that is compatible with the building and site design. • All roof equipment shall be screened from public view. • Use architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment. 14. UTILITY AREAS • Screen exterior trash receptacles, storage areas, service yards, and loading areas, from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with the building and site design. Use materials and design treatment similar to buildings and "New England" style. Provide plant material to augment screening and blending into landscape. Integrate more uses into structure, such as signage, trellis, ect. 15. LIGHTING Lighting can add special character to the nighttime appear- ance of the area. It can illuminate building entrances, pedes- trian walkways, and advertising or floodlight special build- ings. However, if left without consideration of the entire Liberty Village experience, unchecked lighting can produce visual chaos, waste energy, create safety concerns, and impose upon the adjacent residents. • A coordinated lighting plan should be submitted for review with building plans. Provide information on each individual light fixture proposed, including fixture sections, lamp type, wattage, and photometric diagram. • Ceiling and wall mount lighting fixtures should be con- cealed or integrated into the overall design of the project. Light source should be hidden from direct pedestrian or motorist view or directed in a such a way that minimizes glare. • Traditional post and bracket mounted fixtures compatible in style with the "Vernon" style street lights should be select- ed. • Unshielded wall pack light fixtures are not appropriate. • Up -spots into boulevard and perimeter trees is encouraged. Provide weatherproof outlets at trees to enable holiday lighting. RECOMMENDED: Signage sized for visibility for customers driving by. Use of facade and cornice treatment on flat roofs. NOT RECOMMENDED: Strip center design with unbroken rows of parking spaces, sidewalks too narrow to allow sidewalk tree planting. Windows covered with sign placements. RECOMMENDED: Theme related architecture(but not this theme), masonry construction, and planting. 16. SIGNS AND GRAPHICS A key to the financial viability, vitality, civic interest and "pedestrian friendli- ness" of Liberty Village will be deter- mined by its signs. A reference to the Charles Wysocki illustration at left, records the use of signs that bring life to a village of shops and the conservative architecture of the colonial "New England" style. Signage for Liberty Village is positioned in a variety of places; on monuments, on out buildings, on trellis/arbor elements, on building wall/roof surfaces, on brackets, on canopies, on light posts and in windows. • The Liberty Village Overall Signing Plan has predetermined perimeter sign locations for the Master Sign Program, Freestanding Sign Program and Directory Sign Program. • Lettering is to be of an approved type face (see Font Candidate Selections) ex- cept under individual approval from the Liberty Village Business Association, Ar- chitectural Review Committee (A.R.C.). In each case, the selection of type face, size, graphic symbol, color, de- tailing, and lighting approach are im- portant to achieving A.R.C. approval. (Above) NOT RECOMMENDED: Wall mounted signs, internally lit signage, side- walks without canopy trees, arbitrary shapes, material changes without detailing. (Left & Right) RECOMMENDED: Pedes- trian and internal traffic oriented signing. D2003 Putman Planning and Design italliaalkar&Ah. Above: Good example of directory signage for a multi -tenant building. EX01ICFi/OFUCSEPL%�+t'�CS CACD AC CESSORIES I1ANtiINC, BASKETS IERB Projecting signs with appropriate materials, size, shape, and location. Page 13 €illiliilillilillliiilliiTTilil-13113111ZIi3 rtir*yeuro ►MK42 • 4v'N • - n S L 1PzD< lam. K. leo > 5. 1•0 pEr1i£+rr-caitlr6 �uS se- pg‘tefile��Z 01/ Z Wien( 8'un+4¢Ca{f fmee A Village Commercial area is unique in that there are multiple frontages for stores and services. Signage must flag attention of high speed vehicle travel on perimeter highways. This, while internal, slow speed vehicle travel and pedestrian use requires a different type, scale and feel of signage. These signing guidelines attempt to accomplish both the aesthetic goals originally set for Liberty on the Lake, Liberty Village and assist the business owners and tenants with critically important marketing visibility. LEFT & LEFT ABOVE: Sketches from the original Preliminary Plat Application illustrate the incorporation of the Master Sign and Freestanding Sign Programs into the theme and character of Liberty Village. Permitted signs by a sign permit in Liberty Village. (a) GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All signs in Liberty Village are regulated by the following requirements: (1) Number. One wall, monument, awning and canopy or three-dimensional sign is allowed per business. When a building or business abuts two or more public streets, an additional sign located on each street building face is allowed. (2) Sign plan. When there is more than one business or use in a building with more than one sign, a building sign plan must be provided with the sign permit application. (3) Permit review. All signs in the Village Commercial district require a design permit and must meet the approved design guidelines for signage. (4) Other requirements. All signs must meet area, location and height requirements. Page 14 RIGHT: The Liberty Village Overall Signing Plan, for Liberty Village Marketplace, shows locations for the Master Sign Program, Free- standing Signs, Directory Signs and Integral Signs. Building signs such as Wall Signs, Roof Signs, Projecting Signs and Awning Signs will be determined for each individual building. The perimeter signage locations referenced from the Preliminary Plat Plan have been fully illustrated in the new Master Sign Plan. The goal of the perimeter signs is to inform the motorist traveling on Manning Avenue or County Road 12 as to the business uses in Liberty Village Marketplace and secondarily to aide the motorist in finding that business. This signage, the Master Sign Program, consists of signage on the outbuildings, structures or pylons, along Manning Avenue and County Road 12. EW EN L PL LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN D1 M3 M1,M2,M3,M4'\-,�� MASTER-S`IGN PROGRAM LOCATIONS The four Multi -Use Buildings: 2, 5, 6 & 7, are each permitted one sign mass or integrated grouping.(Page 17) -f - SCHOOL HOUSE r CIRCLE. � SIZE F 1, F 2 FREE STANDING SIGNS One sign mass or integrated grouping allowed per development access point. D 1, D 2, D 3, D 4, D 5 DIRECTORY SIGNS Used to guide pedestrians to individual businesses. I1 INTEGRAL OR ARCHITECTURAL SIGN Integrated into the structure or architecture of the building, providing the development name, date, etc. 4 2 5 7 75 sq. ft per side., 20 ft. high 100 sq. ft., 25 ft. high 6 sq. ft./business, 12 sq. ft / building or complex As integrated into the design of the building. Page 15 L i b e r t Villa CITY S T I L L W A T E R, MINNESOTA sign type building sign type definitions applied from City Code, Sec.31-101 Sign Criteria for Liberty Village at Liberty on the Lake ' ,, ?+ Ipr-� .� V T 4 h ' t� ti• YE Il P = "lam[ F.,�:. MASTER SIGN PROGRAM For multitenant Commercial Buildings besides individual tenant signs. A one to three sided sign mass or integrated grouping ispermitted for each building. The signage for 9 9 P� 9 9• each side shall not exceed 75 sq.ft. and 20ft. in height. " A, {r r ; : FREE STANDING SIGNS . Freestanding sign means any stationary, self- supporting sign standing on the ground not affixed to a structure, including monument, ground or pedestal signs One sign mass or integrated grouping is permitted per development access point. Area: Total signage sq.ft. may not exceed 100sq.ft. Location: A sign may be located in any required yard but must have a minimum setback of 15ft from any point of vehicular access and public roadway. A 3ft minimum setback is required from the property line Height: A maximum of 25ft. Exception: Monument signs may project no higher than 6ft Height is meas-- ured from the base of sign or grade of nearest roadway, whichever is lower. Lighting: Externally illuminated or back lit letters are allowed. No internally illuminated signs are al- lowed. ,;,< �' tt ; s ``,r _ �L'"' s ,,,. '' %hu o _ ._/ r 41 I 1 I . ^ - � DIRECTORY SIGNS Used to guide pedestrians to individual busi- nesses within a multi -tenant commercial area giving directions & identification only.... Size: 6 sq.ft. per business, 12 sq.ft. per building or complex identification. They be be attached to a building or free standing. Height:18 ft. ht..If the sign is projecting from a Tight pole or building, the height shall, never exceed or obstruct the head of the fight pole or d bottom of the roof Lighting: No internally lit signs allowed. BUILDING SIGNS Up to one wall sign and one sign per awning, and one projecting sign,per business per public street frontage. WALL SIGNS ...a sign attached, painted on the wall of a building with the exposed face of the sign plane parallel to the plane of the wall. Size: 1 sq.ft. / LN.FT. of building parallel to lot line. Sq.ft of signage is calculated on the basis of geomet ric or polyline enclosure of lettering + 3" margin. This is done to encourage decorative in -theme treat` ments. Height: may not project higher than parapet or 20 feet ..., whichever is lower. Lighting: no internally illuminated signs are allowed. r ■ _ E e I ,I ounrr„ '::i+ . E, Nal "` — li ET,a ;, t ' _ AWNING & CANOPY SIGNS means any sign that is painted on or attached to an awning. Permitted signs by a sign permit Awning and canopy signs. (1) Area. The gross surface of an awn- ing or canopy sign may not exceed 50 percent of the gross surface area of the smallest face of the awn- ing or canopy to which the sign is affixed. (2) Location. An awning or canopy sign may not project higher than the top of the awning or canopy or below the awning or canopy apron. L. -_,;. PROJECTING SIGNS means a sign projecting from a building wall. Permitted signs by a sign permit. Projecting sign. A projecting sign in the CBD or CA districts shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area. The total area of a projecting sign may not exceed six square feet. (2) Special conditions. A projecting sign must be easily visible from the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestrians. (3) Lighting. If lighted, projecting signs must be extemally illuminated. IIr/ i i I .k Il°+tutbt- ry'r' ip$t;h_.< WINDOW SIGNS a sign affixed to a window or door glass, but not merchandise on display. Allowed without a permit. No sign permit is required for window signage that does not cover more than one-third of the total area of the window in which the sign is displayed. .4. ' ..�, C JL��'�-�) ` 1^ _ A ARCHITECTURAL SIGNS Integrated into the structure or architecture of the building, providing the development name, date, etc. Permitted r_ 3-D SIGNS Three-dimensional sign means a type of project- ing sign that depicts a physical object. Permitted signs by a sign permit Three-dimensional sign. The total area of a three-dimensional sign in the CBD or CA districts is determined by enclosing the largest cross section of the sign in an easily recognized geometric shape and computing its area. The area may not exceed nine square feet. PUBLIC SIGNS means official signs depicting danger, safety, trespassing, traffic speed limits, scenic or histori- cal points of interest and memorial plaques. Permitted ' hlEti4‘ ('-- p 1 Page 15a Liberty Villa a e P U . D • O F M I N N E S O T A sign type building sign type definitions applied from City Code, Sec,. 31-101 Sign Criteria for Liberty Village at Liberty on the Lake INTEGRAL SIGNS Integral sign means a commemorative table permanently constructed as part of a building. Permitted under approved Design Guidelines. _f- HOLIDAY SIGNS means signs or displays that depict messages regarding a national, state or local holiday. Allowed without a permit. Holiday signs for a period not to exceed 60 days. POLITICAL SIGNS means signs announcing a candidate seeking office or issues to be voted upon on a public elec- tion. Allowed without a permit. Size. The size of a political sign is regulated as follows: CONSTRUCTION SIGNS means a sign at a construction site identifying the project. Allowed without a permit. Construction signs. The signs must be confined to the site and must be re - moved within two years of the date of issuance of the first building permit or upon completion of the pro- ject, whichever occurs first. One sign is permitted for each street the project abuts. No sign may exceed 32 square feet in multifamily residential, commercial and industrial districts. REAL ESTATE SIGNS Real estate sign means a business sign placed upon a properly advertising that property for sale, rent or lease. Allowed without a permit Real estate signs are limited to six square feet in residential districts and 32 square feet in commercial districts. Signs must be removed within ten days after sale or rental of property RUMMAGE SALE SIGNS means a sign advertising a rummage or garage sale. Allowed without a permit Rummage sale signs not exceeding four square feet located on private prop - erty that conform to the applicable provisions of this ordinance and are removed at the termination of the sale. BUILDING ADDRESS General provisions. The following provisions apply to signs located in all zoning districts:(k) A building address is not a sign. NAMEPLATE SIGNS Nameplate sign means a sign that states the naoccupand/or address of the business, industry or Allowed without a permit One nameplate for each dwelling group of six or more units. The sign may not exceed six square feet in area per surface. No sign may be constructed to have more than two sur- faces. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SIGN means a sign intended to sell or promote a devel- opment project of three or more acres. Allowed without a permit Real estate development project signs. For a development project of three to 25 acres, one sign not to exceed 100 square feet of advertising surface may be erected on the project site. ...The sign may not remain after 95 percent of the project is developed. The permit for the sign must be renewed annually by the city council, and must be bordered with a decorative material compatible with the surrounding area. If the signs are lighted, it must be illuminated only during those hours when business is in operation or when the model homes or other development are open for conducting business. TEMPORARY SIGN / BANNER/ FLAGS means a sign constructed of paper, cloth, canvas or other similar lightweight material and signs intended to be displayed for a short period -of time. Permitted by Admin. Action 4/yr up to 90 days ea. ' R =,to�,,nn,. it E., MARQUEE SIGN means a permanent roof like structure extending frotrh� part of the wall of a building and constructed of durable material. * :. ,,�,. , ""; sue~, +tom �� + _ tS I �,�, i ROOF SIGN means a sign that is erected over the roof of a building. Size: 1 sq.ft. / LN.FT. of building parallel to lot line. Sq.ft of signage is calculated on the basis of geomet- ric or polyline enclosure of lettering + 3" margin. This is done to encourage decorative in theme treat- ments. Height: may not project higher than roof line Lighting: no internally illuminated signs are allowed. ..` - `,! t ,__„— LEA C�z,,,, , ,1.,x I': Page 15b L i b e r t V i l l a g e P . U . D A m e n d m e n t• CITY OF S T I L L W A T E R, MINNESOTA sign type building sign type definitions applied from City Code, Sec. 31-101 Sign Criteria for Liberty Village at Liberty on the Lake PORTABLE SIGN means a sign that is designed to be moved. Permitted under approved Design Guidelines. 4 s mcgcL� 1, 1 F AI.KER`5 sxm' C - � Y�A : sus ` t5 } SANDWICH SIGNS All signs shall conform to the Stillwater Sidewalk Sign Policy approved by the Stillwater City Coun- al on November 11, 2008 Business owners will be free to design high quality, creative signage with minimum restrictions, encour aging hand painted, carved and unique signage provided that the sign is a flat surface. GRAPHIC SIGN means any mural or pictorial scene or graphic design painted on the side of a wall or building or painted on a sign board affixed to a wall and in which a mural or scene has its purpose, an artistic effect. Permitted under approved Design Guidelines. To be sized in proportion to space allocated Graphic Signs may be lit, if lighting is by reflective Tight and light source does not create excessive glare, leading to reasonable safety concerns. BILLBOARD means a non -accessory sign erected for the pur- pose of advertising a product, event, person or subject not usually related to the premises on which the sign is located. Not Permitted ` ORNAMENTATION means decoration added to embellish something, especially a building, but usually Navin no practi- cal purpose, especially a small object such as a figurine or sculpture. Permitted under approved Design Guidelines. To be sized in proportion to space allocated . � • } ii _ , t a,.�.m.•.,.... ' t4r k� g� t lit`. Page 15c LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN MASTER SIGN PROGRAM The Master Sign Program introduces a brand, or identifiable logo, to identify and create a destination: the Liberty Village Marketplace. (b) MASTER SIGN PROGRAM. A Master Sign Program is for commercial areas in addition to the individual tenant and occupant signs. Master identification signs are permitted according to the following requirements: (1) Master Sign Program signs may not contain the names of any tenants or occupants of the center, although generic names of the services provided may be used. Exception: Where the business name is or can be brief, and its identity in the market place will read faster, better and/or more complete information to a potential customer on perimeter roads, the master sign program tenant signs can include the business name. For example; the words "Kwik Trip" provide more complete information to a potential customer driving by than the words Food & Fuel. (2) Each building may have a one to three sided master identification sign mass or integrated grouping with a maximum of 75 square feet on each sign side and with a maximum height of 20 feet. (3) Location. The location of signs has been predetermined on the Liberty Village Sign Master Plan. Master Program signs must be set back 3 feet from the property line. (4) Number. The number of Master Sign Program signs has been predetermined on the Liberty Village Sign Master Plan. (5) Illumination. Internally illuminated signs are permitted if the background is opaque and the lettering is illuminated. Page 16 Village Branding Concepts General Village Icon (Star): center icon spins General Village Icon (Bell): center icon stationary In order to create a more identifiable brand, the word MARKETPLACE and the outline of the upper ribbon, would be highlighted in neon. l LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN DELI CPA DENTIST INSURANCE i MASTER SIGN PROGRAM 111,1 111 NW 11 ' 11 IIlifIlHl fill DELI CPA DENTIST INSURANCE IIIi IMllA�ill `Flail ®II! ilia j1Ej MIMI V I Wig IIIIII ,_ K.- .. .� (Above) Master Sign location M4 provides a more vertical element to reinforce the pedestrian entry location for Liberty Village Marketplace traffic off of County Road 12. (Below) Three variations are shown which depict conceptual design studies for the structure. Owner preferences and budgets will determine final form and detail. DELI CPA DENTIST INSURANCE r IIII11 � I�ICCCCCII'�c„r r_ r - II; III ill I I 11 11RIIIl111 II LT'. IT,ALI. EATER VET KARAT The Master Sign Program also provides sign space for each ownerltenant. In order to maximize the readability and efficiency of this approach, each tenant sign will use a consistent font and color. The names and words selected will be generic (and/or, if the name of business is brief enough, ie: "Sals Cafe", then the business name can be used) to allow mortorists a "quick read" of the businesses available. In other words, the accounting firm of Smith, Smith & Smith Inc. would be simplified to ACCOUNTANT This allows the motorist a quick perception of what types of businesses are available in Liberty Village Marketplace, without having to spell out the entire name of the business, or guess as to what kind of business it is. Where the business name is or can be brief, and its identity in the market place will read faster, better and/or more complete information to a potential customer on perimeter roads, the master sign program tenant signs can include the business name. For example; the words "Kwik Trip" provide more complete information to a potential customer driving by than the words Food & Fuel. The Master Sign Program has space allocated to announce public, business and community events. DELI CPA DENTIST LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN ir MASTER SIGN PROGRAM Pm°4111 DELI CPA —mg DENTIST IF" 1 I rim.aa.r..,.,,,,....,„T, ,...1 ...... „•••• 1 ' IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII ___,.......111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111ffill111111111111111111111111111111111111111011111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIII1 111111111111111 I IIIII..........M' .IIIMMI.M.---- M.1,11......." 1...........1/ 1•1•.1.1.1.1... 11•111.11... 1111=1.......... 3•••......... IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII miiiiiiimil iminglaug iiiiiimin in miununoil UW1111111111'11 1111114111111111111 11111111111114 11111111111111 1111111111111 ••••••.' .....••••••••••1 o...."....".".- Page 18 18 M4 lit I I NI 1111111k111111 11111111111g1111111111111111111111111 1111i111 111111111111111111111!1111 opPomme'. I 11111111 III ill ---111111,1111---1111111 11-I I 11 1111111101 DIM I _ 1711 I 111111 Trail entry, dumpster enclosures and trellis. (Left) Views from Myrtle (County Rd. 12) viewing Master Sign Program loca- '40 tions M3 & M4 look- -4 ing east. (Left) M4 at far left, and M3 at right. M3 LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN r: firartf 'FL— • 1 r.'• . . . f.t" (Below and right) Views from Manning Avenue looking at Mas- ter Sign Program location M2. It is an assembly of elements. P.1111 DELI '41 CPA '41 DENTIST r— HEALTH CLUB ITALIAN EATERY (Above and left) Looking south from the intersection of County Rd. 12 & Manning Avenue, the Master Sign Program's "brand- ing". . . Liberty Village Marketplace, is visible at location M2. This location, alongside an existing structure (dumpster enclo- sure) also highlights the pedestrian connection between the trail along Manning Avenue and Liberty Village Marketplace. 0 0 QM. Page 19 LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN Page 20 MASTER SIGN PROGRAM View from Manning Avenue looking north. Note revisions to existing structures highlighting pedes- trian access points along trail into Liberty Village Marketplace. This view also illustrates the inte- gral/architectural sign (I1) in the gable of the Wines & Spirits building. Is I1 M1 LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN FREESTANDING SIGNS Once the motorist has turned off of Manning or County Road 12, the Freestanding Sign Program will provide reassurances the motorist is headed in the right direction. These signs will be placed on the car wash building of Kwik Trip, and on School House Circle to direct traffic off the round -about. See FI & F2 on pages 15, 22 &23. (c) FREESTANDING SIGNS. Freestanding signs in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area. The gross surface area of a ground sign may not exceed 100 square feet for each exposed face nor exceed an aggregate gross surface area of 1,200 square feet. (2) Location. A ground sign must be set back 3 feet from the front or side property line. When on City land, approval must be obtained. (3) Height. A ground sign may not project higher than 25 feet, as measured from base of sign or grade of the nearest adjacent roadway, whichever is lower. (4) Number. There may be one freestanding sign per access point into the district. Page 21 LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN FREESTANDING SIGNS The Liberty clock tower at the center of the roundabout is a vertical element that should reinforce the motorists way finding toward Liberty Village Marketplace. Below, the Marketplace neon brand element is shown incorporated with the clock tower. Permission will be sought and obtained from the H.O.A. prior to executing this sign in its approved form Page 22 LIBERTY VILLAGE OVERALL SIGNING PLAN FREESTANDING SIGNS To reinforce the progression toward Liberty Village Marketplace, a ground or monument sign is located to announce the correct turn-off of the roundabout. This low wall would be incorporated into the existing bench/sitting area. Permission will be sought and obtained from the Park Board prior to executing this sign in its approved form. 111111111111110111.111C.:Wilif JO& Nor, o•-•"' • Page 23 Larger windows, awnings, varied roof alignments, canopies, and bracket mount- ed signage create a visually interesting place to be, and a place to which people will want to return. Page 23a The images below come from the original PUD and Design Guidelines booklet prepared in 2003. Decorative, formal, themed signage accent simple building elevations. 0 uOne & two story buildings, which favor roof dormers, provide A.R.C. the p essence of New England style buildings. Signage and Business Identity is critical for success. Appropriate themed sign design, detail and placement help bring preliminary Building #3 Elevation "Alive". Facing Manning Avenue, Elevation drawing shows decorative signs mounted on walls, roofs, brackets and canopies. BUILDING #2 SIGNAGE EXAMPLE The above image reflects the sign guideline criteria applied to Building #2. The business' identities have been strengthened by the use of Wall Signs, Awning & Canopy Signs, Projecting Signs, Roof Signs, 3-D signs, Directory Signs, and Sandwich Signs. The incorporation of all these sign types are critical for the success of a business. Page 23b DIRECTORY SIGN PROGRAM Light Pole Bracket Signs As the motorist ventures further into Liberty Village, the vehicle speed drops way down and the Directory Sign Program will provide guidance in locating the major businesses or the appropriate building and its associated parking area. These signs will be placed on the streetlight and pedestrian light poles found throughout Liberty Village Marketplace, and include light pole bracket signs, light pole banners & multiple tenant bracket signs. Placement: Directory signs must be placed on the site of the develoent and may be rected only in internal pedestrian access areas and not in vehicle access areas. They may be attached to a building, or free standing. Area: 6 sq.ft per business, 12 sq.ft. per building or complex identifiction Height: 18 ft. If the sign is projecting from a light pole or building, the height shall never exceed or obstruct the head of the light pole or the bottom of the roof. Use: A directory sign may only be used for directions and identification Generic Business Icon: center icon spins Specific Business Name: Large Generic Business Description Light Pole Banners Once parked and on foot, the building signs will provide the final direction to the destination. The building sign options include Wall Signs, Projecting Signs, Awningl CanopylMarquee Signs, Roof Signs and Portable Signs. DIRECTORY SIGN PROGRAM Multiple Tenant Bracket Signs Multiple Flag Brackets: alternate every other pole throughout Village YOUR NAME HERE DomagalaLaw COUNTRY Insurance & Financial Services PRIME MORTGAGE Custom Financial Solutions Salon Sierra Hair Stylists Bently J Companies Leasing 952-512-1998 FONG CLINIC MEDICAL - LASER n n ■ FONG CLINIC BUILDING SIGNS (d) WALL SIGNS. Wall signs in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area. One square foot per linear foot of building, parallel or substantially parallel to the front lot line. Square footage of signage will be calculated on the basis of geometric or polyline enclosure of the lettering plus a three inch margin. This will encourage decorative in - theme treatments. (2) Height. A wall sign may not project higher than the parapet line of the wall to which the sign is affixed or 20 feet as measured from the base of the building wall to which the sign is affixed, whichever is lower. (3) Special conditions. Where a principal building is devoted to two or more uses, the operator of each use may install a wall sign upon each share of the building. A sign plan must be submitted for the entire building that shows the location, sizes, types and elevations of all signs. The signs are subject to the following restrictions: i. All signs must be visually consistent in location, design and scale. (e) AWNING, CANOPY OR MARQUEE SIGNS. Awning, canopy or marquee signs in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area. The gross surface area of an awning, canopy or marquee sign may not exceed 50 percent of the gross surface area of the awning, canopy or marquee to which the sign is affixed. (2) Location. A sign may be affixed to or located upon any awning, canopy or marquee. (3) Height. An awning, canopy or marquee sign may not project higher than the top of the awning, canopy or marquee to which the sign is affixed or below the awning or canopy apron. Page 26 (f) PROJECTING SIGNS. A projecting sign in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area. The total area of a projecting sign may not exceed six square feet. (2) Special conditions. A projecting sign must be easily visible from the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestrians. Lighting. If lighted, projecting signs must be externally illuminated. (g) (3) THREE DIMENSIONAL SIGNS. The total area of a three-dimensional sign in Liberty Village is determined by enclosing the largest cross section of the sign in an easily recognized geometric shape and computing its area. The area may not exceed nine square feet. (h) TEMPORARY SIGN OR BANNER. Temporary Signs or Banners in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Duration. There may be up to 4 per year for up to 90 days each. (2) Banners may be applied to supports not on the building but within the owner's property, meeting the same criteria above. (i) INTEGRAL SIGN. Permitted under Design Guidelines, as approved by the City and the Owners Association. j) ROOF SIGN. Roof signs in Liberty Village shall meet the following requirements: (1) Area: One square foot per linear foot of building, parallel or substantially parallel to the front lot line.Square footage of signage will be calculated on the basis of geometric or polyline enclosure of the lettering plus a three inch margin. This will encourage decorative in -theme treatments. (2) Height. A wall sign may not project higher than the roof line (3) Special conditions. Where a principal building is devoted to two or more uses, the operator of each use may install a roof sign upon each share of the building. A sign plan must be submitted for the entire building that shows the location, sizes, types and elevations of all signs. The signs are subject to the following restrictions: i. All signs must be visually consistent in location, design and scale. BUILDING SIGNS (k) SANDWICH BOARD OR SIDEWALK SIGNS. Permitted under Design Guidelines, as approved by the City and the Owners Association. SIDEWALK SIGN GUIDELINES FOR LIBERTY VILLAGE 1. Generally 1.1. Business owners assume the liability of the signs placed on public property. 1.2. The City of Stillwater will enforce its sign regulations along Stillwater streets and not those of other agencies or jurisdictions. The City of Stillwater will not be responsible for the removal of signs placed in right-of-ways controlled by other jurisdictions. 2. Type 2.1. Signs shall be an A -frame or single -panel style. 2.2. Signs must be portable and stable. 2.3. These guidelines do not allow portable interchangeable copy signs, typically placed on highways. 3. Size & Shape 3.1. Signs may consist of an overall size of up to 30" wide by up to 36" high by up to 24" deep. 3.2. Signs may be a silhouette or cut into a shape. Protruding sections, which can cause a hazard to pedestrian traffic, will not be permitted. 4. Colors 4.1. Signs must be consistent with approved Liberty Village approved color scheme for building front and signage. 4.2. Sign cannot mimic traffic sign (including yellow traffic signs or construction zone orange) or contain sign -grade reflective material. 5. Design & Features 5.1. Business owners will be free to design high quality, creative signage with minimum restrictions, encouraging hand painted, carved and unique signage. 5.2. No interchangeable letters or letter copy on rails is permitted. 5.3. Sidewalk signs shall not be illuminated. 5.4. Signs shall contain a device (such as: braces, chain, rope, cable, etc.) to prevent sign panels from spreading. 5.5. All signs shall be maintained in a high quality state, with no peeling, broken, cracked, or faded paint/vinyl. 6. Materials 6.1. Signs shall be constructed using quality exterior, weatherproof, sign board materials. 6.2. Signs constructed with light materials such as plastic should be weighted, to remain stationary on windy days. 6.3. No loose or lightly attached sign panels. 7. Installation 7.1. Each business shall be allowed to display only one sandwich board -type sign at a time. 7.2. Placement of sidewalk signs on private landscaped areas in front of business, between front of building and sidewalk is allowed. 7.3. Buildings with more than one tenant will be allowed one sidewalk sign per 20 linear feet of building frontage, provided all other guidelines can be met. 7.4. Signs shall be temporary and may be displayed during business hours only. Signs must be removed and stored indoors after hours. 7.5. Signs on private property may be placed on any ground surface that does not conflict with pedestrian circulation. Signs on public sidewalk must be setback 1 foot from the back of curb. 7.6. Signs must be setback a minimum of 15 feet from that back of curb of any intersection. 7.7. Signs must not interfere with access to business, the passage of pedestrians on the sidewalk, or the opening of the doors of parked vehicles. Sign placement shall conform with all Fire Code provisions. 7.8. Signs cannot be placed in front of or adjacent to another business, commercial enterprise, or vacant land, unless permission is given by the building or business owner. 7.9. Five feet of clearance must be maintained (unobstructed by signs) between the building and street for pedestrian circulation. 7.10. Signs shall not be displayed after a snow event of two inches or greater until all snow removal operations are completed. 8. Area these Guidelines Affect 8.1. This guidelines shall be applicable to the area within Liberty Village. 1) GRAPHIC SIGNS. Permitted under approved Design Guidelines (1) Size: To be sized in proportiong to space allocated. (2) Lighting: Graphic Signs can be lit, if lighting is by reflective light & light source does not create glare, leading to reasonable safety concerns. m) ORNAMENTATION/SCULPTURE. Permitted under apporved Design Guidelines. Page 27 FONT CANDIDATE SELECTIONS Liberty Village YthUlOv `z/l! Calrton Willow Liberty Village Times LIBERTY VILLAGE Capitals TAiberty ViLage Bodoni Liberty Pillage Talon Liberty Vilia e Minion Lthe7ZTy ViLaqe Oxford Liberty VillageLiberty Village navvru= Lt!6eVt7 village CaFl.sch lEilbxe]rtyVfillalge Viva Alison LIBERTY VI ,T ,AGE Castellar MT Liberty Village New Century Liberty LIBERTY VILLAGE Lthert Village LIBERTY VILLAGE LIt3EftIy VILLAqE LLerty Ville Liberty ULllage tjrL� Yllase Je.r&i t3e. Lbert2 Vill��e /-14-7C7V+ Zile4/tp- »rt±yri•-•& Tyndale Parrish Ambient Dard Hunter Salon J Hopper da Vinci Victorian Cezan ne E Hopper Michelangelo Dearest Page 28 RECOMMENDED: Well proportioned neon signs in windows. Steady pitched 12:12 awnings in tasteful color(s) that respond to architectural detailing and window shapes. RECOMMENDED: Signs mounted on walls (or roofs), with type sized for reading at a com- mon viewing distance from a car, or on the street to walk to store fronts. Signage placement on/behind windows must not exceed 25% of window surface. Lettering on awning valances. 17. AWNINGS • Retractable or operable awnings are encouraged. Fixed awnings should mimic the profile of operable units (one to one pitch). • The emphasis of the awning should remain one of shelter and protection, rather than signage. In keeping with this; the awning should be loose and flowing, not stretched tight, subtle and subdued in color, not bright, extending well out over the sidewalk, not mere window dressing. • The width of awnings should fit the geometry of the building facade. They should not extend across multiple store- fronts of different buildings, but should reflect the window or door openings below. • The use of water-repellent or vinyl - coated canvas is in keeping with awnings of the time. Plastic or aluminum awnings or canopies are not appropriate. • Fixed, round -headed awnings will be considered only over arched windows or doors, and only if placed below or within the arched lintel. • The awning valance, or skirt, shall be proportioned to the size of the awning but shall not exceed twelve (12) inches in height. • Signing on awnings is permitted on the end panel (lower 25% of the slope) or front valance only. Use lettering size pro- portional to the space available. • Back lighting of the awnings is inap- propriate. • Use plain or striped fabrics. Large areas of very bright colors are inappropriate. RECOMMENDED: Canopy colors and angles help bring visual interest, variety, and shelter to the shopper. Page 29 RECOMMENDED: Canopies, umbrellas in public spaces create "civic" spaces. Lingering invited. 18. COLORS The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already established by adja- cent buildings. The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the indiscriminate use of colors and color combinations can over- load the senses and produce visual con- flict and chaos. Exercise caution in the use of colors and tone combinations and their patterns. The goal is to achieve an area -wide complementary blend of back- ground colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and focal colors. • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious though varied effect. • Avoid colors, which visually overpow- er or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established color schemes as a whole. • The color of brick or other natural building materials should dictate the color family choice. • Sign colors are a significant source of interest, contrast and accent. • Actual color samples of the materials to o be used must be of sufficient size to see at a distance outside must be provided to the A.R.C. N RECOMMENDED: Even strong colors in carefully selected shades work well in bringing a gathering place to life. Page 30 19. PARKING Parallel parking will be provided between the front of the building and Liberty Square (refer to site plan). These will be short-term spaces for easy accessibility to retail shops. Longer -term parking will be provided at the rear of the structures. Parking quantities will be based on performance -based industry stan- dards. A reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces may be allowed in the case of shared park- ing areas, if peak operation times are different and parking quantities are supported by substantiated industry standard of specific vendor "proof of parking" performance operational data. A reduction on one (1) parking space from the number of required off-street parking spaces may be approved for each on -street parking space at the lot frontage on a public street, provided sufficient sidewalk street furniture and street facing design, detail and signage are provided. 20. BICYCLE PARKING Bike racks should be provided in appropriate locations to encourage exercise and non -vehicular use. Each site in Liberty Village should provide a location and rack. 21. STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS Store operators are required to include spaces and "street furniture" such as benches, game/picnic tables, drinking fountains as well as walk up windows to dispense products during summer months. Inevitably, this will lead to RECOMMENDED: Sheltering porches, columns bring interest to conservative main building mass and roof detail. Page 31 RECOMMENDED: Tree grates enable boulevard tree use. Canopies and awnings offer a pedestrian orientated urban setting. Page 32 added litter and "loitering." Properly designed store interiors, that enhance store attendants focus to be directed to these out- door spaces, will do much to quietly govern civic behavior. The decision to create the pedestrian -friend- ly community of Liberty on the Lake is in part, a commitment to build and maintain the public and semi-public spaces to which pedestrians are drawn. To object to main- taining these, once one has decided to build in Liberty, is to forget one of its attractions and source of added value. • Store owner/operators should anticipate added exterior upkeep both through their Liberty Village Shops on the Square M N Association, and sustain their individual ° upkeep budgets. Crosswalks are to be provided where shown on the site plan. Varied paving colors/paint with crosswalk signage is a minimum treat- ment. Paving texture changes are encour- aged. 22. LANDSCAPING • Highlight important architectural features and structures by use of distinctive land- scaping. • Visually and physically buffer parking lots from adjacent buildings and pedestrian walkways with groupings of plant materi- als. • Frame and edge buildings where feasible with appropriate types of plant material to achieve human scale. • Carefully locate street trees and shrub plantings to buffer and separate walkways from traffic. Create shade where needed for pedestrian and establish more clearly defined pedestrian use areas. Distinctive architectural styling is enhanced by the careful placement of street trees and "street furnishing." RECOMMENDED: Street trees soften architectural ty for pedestrians. features and provide enclosure/safe- ©2003 Putman Planning and Design • Establish where practical, canopy trees to pro- vide shade for parked cars. Tree planting in park- ing lot islands will reduce heat gain and should be encouraged. • Avoid blocking sight lines to primary building signage. This can be accomplished through prop- er plant species selection and/or trimming/pruning. • Each Liberty Village owner is responsible for adhering to the master planing plan for the street trees and perimeter planing requirements when specific site building and sign plans are present- ed to A.R.C. • Minimum boulevard tree size is 3" cal. Minimum shrub size is 2' ht. Planting must meet or exceed American Nursery Standards. • Avoid eye level vegetation foliage at cross- walks and at street corners through proper plant specification and or pruning/trimming. 23. MANAGEMENT It is anticipated that the Liberty Home Owners Associ- ation and the Liberty Village Business Association will jointly initiate and advocate social activities, groups and functions in and around Liberty Square. This will help the shops gain added public presence, enhance business revenues, provide free advertising and be- come part of an occasional destination, in addition to a convenient stop. Page 33 Page 34 A F1IELD GUIDE ' ro AMEKICAN HOUSE: ) ) THE GUIDE THAT ENABLES YOU TO IDENTIFY, AND PLACE IN 'THEIR HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS, THE. HOUSES YOU SEE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD OR IN YOUR TRAVELS ACROSS AMERICA—JIOUSES MIFF F FOR AMERICAN FAMILIES RICH, POOR, AND IN-BETWEEN), IN CITY AND C'OU TRYSIDE, FROM THE l /11I CENTURY TO TITE PRESENT `TIRGINIA & LEE McALESTER APPENDIX "NEW ENGLAND" COLONIAL STYLES: GEORGIAN MASSING, DETAILS 00000 0000n 00-00 s' 000 000 00- 0 0 0 0 0 00(-100 Iiamsburg orfolk North Carolina -._ -" s Soiitit • ilmington `t f harles'Iown (Charleston) Alabama (;eorgia avannah na-00 onsmouth Salem :idencc tie,,. R.I. Aih Florida 1CIPAL SET-rLED AREAS. 080 (:I IARLESTON HOUSE shoe side turned to street, galleries along one side •principal towns and cities from: Fries, t966 Kagan,:966 Chitwood, t96i U 8 fi n 71a 00000 0000000 00 -00 0001000 1 tJ a 1J lJ 00 00 1 000 0 0 COMMON NORTHERN VARIANTS usually wood frame, upper window Touches cornice in most two-story examples MIDDLE: COLONIES usually stone or brick, most northern and some southern variants found here COMMON SOUTHERN VARIANTS usually brick, raised foundation, belt course between stories (also on northern masonry examples) / /A\00000 00 0000 —00 r � 00 0 0n0 n 0 n MOST COMMON IN NORII IERN COLONIES side -gabled, open gambrel COMMON ONLY IN MIDDLE COLONIES side -gabled, closed or pedimcntcd pent MUSE COMMON IN SOUTHERN COLONIES AND IN IIICI I -STYLE EXAMPLFS, Ali. COLONIES double -hipped hipped ROOF SHAPE MOST COMMON IN NORTIlERN COLONIES central chimney .MNEY PLACEMENT COMMON IN ALL COLONIES paired interior chimneys COMMON IN SOUTHERN AND MIDDLE COLONIES paired end chimneys paired double interior chimneys FOUND IN HIGH -STYLE EXAMPLES —ALL COLONIES paired double end chimneys BUILDING MASSING AND WINDOW PATTERN P. c i common i t-- C 0 CI Adamcsyuc detail on surround or tight very common ENTRIES o❑ Page 35 COLONIAL: "NEW ENGLAND" STYLE VARIATIONS & DETAILS ppronmae isrribmron n (:reek nova) Ines GREEK REVIVAL ROW IJ (:reek Revival e00es u(tna onnt t3dmg m o&umn shaft Dorm 4a pe(enne kok. 1S patent C. wi.uhran. I percent Greek, Ronan. Roman fluted. fluted Tuscan, no hose with base endured with bus ALCNN TYPES (.reek, Rom. n. link Rung large 'caroms • and Curopurne, volutes some(.'. , Ruauo. Crtinibun at 45 s ! smiler with whims angis I tdJuI N)L'ttU: 000er fund in Greek and Roman pentorypea vernandar Doric dmptifier ices, 4o parent based lamely or, (;reek and Ronan precedents Ala trpmpn n wood eon canner ► maWory esezdcs f+(.1t INFIVL (:RV 0NS ;.PICAL WINDOW DETAILS TtHRFT.PART mamas' nod ppanth hex a)1 open (9e merest to porch.. }lass pones sometimes emend to Ruin Earl ):14IN( Aorta W1,ffilw Darn volutes Iona inmhus kavec CLASSICAL CAPITALS +0 6 _ .nata.g, (aoo4 ern Moe and window clowns Gook Yea lair'. tree mutukt. (omd tlentad1 weaver t�lll�lyl.,11d!1r t► A.63,4 esihA1t! P egg and -dart design hrmegsaekk-leaf ;h gn. nnhenrom CLASSIC REVIVAL facade emeltr tkatumnl by lull. hesght entry porch. with iriaguUT galdr dame ammatr. by (W (doom with shallow equate heat ierni,irtairt err dhfrn al fanlight „per purkd door GEORGIAN DETAILS wok. shallow wood mo,Rins se-c pp 150'9) pIc:AI. WINDOW fare ppssk--oi i z li mull pan of glut welly 9/9Pu0su Mown or t a / I S. 9/6,6/9.11/ IS. art)/B tool TYPICAL WRNICE Orap .(I! wt7Ii F.VTAA/AT7: RF. most c040060l m nsulhrrn Nouns 11111ANGULIR MANC.F. IN MAS()NII PATTERN am( common in southern 1:11a50t1rt VATI1p1_s Slti.Vfklal'SL-V_-- roar CIOn 0 040P�a ©DY BQQ. rnmrrsnrl TWO-STORY pages 174-3 CLASSIC REVIVAL MASSING ONM:STORY Page 174 GABLE FRONT ANO WINS page 17S WINDOW TREATMENTS mammas bad kevenoc segmental arch (000 0003 9/9 aao.l P^Pn1u in southern ud mime ley None lintel du limes 4,v stone (arnl'tinat 6miraeA)fjJjJ 0 a u L. Ci 0 0 I 6.(6 meal crampon m all whelks ZEN PI 1 a. and 9/6 also OM(ar 1U■I IU1 111■ 1 I 1 14/1a nwv popular m rrmthttn Mimics 6/6 awn carvrsysn m all col..: , tall and other (Georgian variations still once RV AfASn)VRY 1\ \Lk: %INIX)W COMPARISONS: GEORGIA:S & AI)AM tarpon -map war I.% enuMarnae wnh ample Gieve Pedieraaed window Snratdature with design in (ricer .lfahiar(Ifr wait rinlpk hien hLlsfp N7'pl) oft citostNM) NINak)w' i L %L A(1.\ (LV wo00.(7.A0 tc Alt:. A shallow -molded, nnadoeucd carmine. Nett' outman an (ientgsan ad Adam hoses B.0 typical Georgian runnel.* with nMdillinu andlnr &ends. aIso found on Adam KWxs 1),E,Y.G,1.1 typed de(oalt. ,;dam °Mixt, s Page 36 NOTE: Note the shallow overhang & frieze at the gable & almost g flush overhang at the rake. Symmetrical window positioning for each building front is typical of New England/Colonial styles. Roof pitches are steeper and roofs have shallow gable overhangs and flush or very shallow rake overhangs. Page 37 PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for : Glossary Baluster: A short post in a series supporting a handrail and thus forming a balustrade. Balustrade: A hand railing or upright posts or balusters. Bay: An outward projection of a wall with windows, or a division in a wall seen as space between piers or columns. Blocking Course: The plain course of stone surmounting the cornice at the top of the building; also a projecting cornice of stone or brick at the base of a building. Canopy: A projection or hood over a door, window, niche, etc. Capital: The head or crowning feature of a column. Cladding: An external covering or skin applied to a structure for aesthetic or protective purposes. Column: An upright member, designed to carry a load. Concrete: Cement mixed with coarse and fine aggregate (such as pebbles, crushed stone, brick) , sand and water in specific proportions. Coping: A capping or covering to a wall, either flat or sloping to throw off water. Corbelling: Brick of masonry courses, each built out beyond the one below like a series of corbels to support a projections, windows, etc. Cornice: Any projecting ornamental molding along the top of a building, wall, etc., fin- ishing or crowning it. Dentils: Small brick blocks or toothed wood decorative members found in classical or period architecture in cornices, or other horizontal bands on building facades. Eaves: The under part of a sloping roof overhanging a wall. Elevation: The external faces of a building; also a drawing made in projection on a ver- tical plane to show any one face of a building. False Fronts: A vertical extension of a building facade above a roofline to add visual height. Fascia: A plain horizontal band, which may consist of two or three fascia over sailing each other and sometimes separated by narrow moldings. Fenestration: The arrangement of windows and doors in a building. Gable: The triangular part of an exterior wall, created by the angle of a pitched roof with two sides. Page 38 LIBERTY VILLAGE Hipped Roof: A roof with pitched or sloped ends and sides, which rise from all four sides of a building. Lintel: A horizontal beam or member above a door or window, which supports the wall above the facade opening. Mullions: The frames of divisions within multi -pane windows. Muntin: The vertical part of a door, screen, paneling, etc., butting into, or stopped by, the horizontal rails. Parapet: A low wall, placed to protect any spot where there is a sudden drop, for exam- ple, a wall projecting above a roof plane. Pier: A solid masonry support, as distinct from a column, the solid mass between doors, windows, and other openings in buildings. Pilaster: A shallow pier or rectangular column projecting only slightly from a wall. Pillar: A freestanding upright member, which, unlike a column, need not be cylindrical or conform to any of the orders. Ridge: The horizontal line formed by the junction of two sloping surfaces of a roof. Sash: The frame, which holds window panels, and forms the movable part of the win- dow. Shutter: A rectangular wood or cast iron piece, set on hinges and used to cover a win- dow or door. Historically used for security or to protect window or door openings from natural elements. Sill: The lower horizontal part of a window -frame. Soffit: The underside of any architectural element. String Course: A continuous projecting horizontal band on a building facade usually made of molding (wood or plaster) or masonry. STILLWATER ZONING ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 3 1 ,SEC . 3 1- 1 0 1. DEFINITIONS, CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA additional definitions BANNER means a sign intended to be hung either with or without a frame pos- sessing character, letters, illustrations or ornamentations applied to paper, plastic or fabric, but not flags, emblems and insignia or political, professional, religious, educational or corporate if the flags, emblems and insignia are displayed for noncommerical purposes. BILLBOARD means a non -accessory sign erected for the purpose of advertising a product, event, person or subject not usually related to the premises on which the sign is located. BUILDING SIGN PLAN means an illustration that shows all signs on a building or group of re - lated buildings. CONSTRUCTION SIGN means a sign at a construction site identifying the project. DIRECTIONAL SIGN means an official sign that contains no advertising and provides direc- tion or instruction to guide persons or vehicles. ELECTRICAL SIGN means signs and displays using electrical power. FLASHING SIGN means an illuminated sign that is not kept constant in intensity of light or color when the sign is illuminated. GOVERNMENTAL SIGN means a sign erected by a governmental unit for identification or traffic. GRAPHIC SIGN means any mural or pictorial scene or graphic design painted on the side of a wall or building or painted on a sign board affixed to a wall and in which a mural or scene has its purpose artistic effect. HISTORICAL SIGN means a sign that is of historical significance or that is an historical re- source within the meaning of Minn. Stat. Ch. 116B. HOLIDAY SIGN means signs or displays that depict messages regarding a national, state or local holiday. ILLUMINATED SIGN means a sign that is lighted by an artificial light source either directed upon it or illuminated from an interior source. INTEGRAL SIGN means a commemorative table permanently constructed as part of a building. MARQUEE SIGN means a permanent roof -like structure extending from part of the wall of a building and constructed of durable material. additional definitions MOBILE SIGN means signs on wheels or that can be easily moved from place to place. MOTION SIGN means a sign that revolves, rotates, has any moving parts or gives the illusion of motion. NAMEPLATE SIGN means a sign that states the name and/or address of the business, in- dustry or occupant. POLITICAL SIGN means signs announcing a candidate seeking office or issues to be voted upon on a public election. PORTABLE SIGN means a sign that is designed to be moved. PUBLIC SIGN means official signs depicting danger, safety, trespassing, traffic speed limits, scenic or historical points of interest and memorial plaques.. PUBLIC UTILITY SIGN means signs that identify ublic utilities. REAL ESTATE DE- VELOPMENT SIGN means a sign intended to sell or promote a development project of three or more acres. REAL ESTATE SIGN means a business sign placed upon a property advertising that prop- erty for sale, rent or lease.. ROOF SIGN means a sign that is erected over the roof of a building. RUMMAGE SALE SIGN means a sign advertising a rummage or garage sale. SIGN means a display, illustration, structure or device that directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or business. The tern does not include the United States flag or a gov- ernmental flag properly displayed. SIGN AREA means the area framed visually by the construction, design or layout of a sign. SIGN STRUCTURE means the supports, uprights, braces and framework of the sign. TEMPORARY SIGN means a sign constructed of paper, cloth, canvas or other similar light- weight material and signs intended to be displayed for a short period of time. Page 39 Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for ,440 =R, LIBERTY VILLAGE AT Stillwaters New Small Town Neighborhood. January 24, 2oo3 DRAFT For: The Architectural Control Committee; Homer Tompkins-CPDC, Paula Kroning-for Newman Realty Partnership Ey: Putman Planning and Design / Development Directions Inc, Tomren Environmental Design Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for : Liberty on the Lake master site plan. LIBERTY VILLAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Objectives 4. Approval Background 5. Building placement and site considerations 6. Building Massing 7. Building Fronts 8. Building height 9. Roof design 10. Franchise Architecture 11. Building Materials 12. Detailing 13. Screening of rooftop equipment 14. Utility areas 15. Lighting 16. Signs and Graphics 17. Awnings 18. Colors 19. Parking 20. Bicycle parking 21. Streetscape elements 22. Landscaping 23. Management Concept Liberty Village Site Plan provided in previous master plan and park design city submit- tals. Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION Liberty Village general development plan showing revised road and parking alignments request- ed by city staff. Liberty Village consists of approximately 7 acres, in the northwest corner of Liberty on the Lake, Stillwater Minnesota. The following design guidelines and per- formance standards shall be observed, in addition to the requirements as applied and approved under a Planned Unit Development for Liberty Village, under the Village Commercial District Ordinance Number 830. It is the aim of these guidelines to maintain quality site planning, architectural design, landscape architectural design and construction in adherence with the Liberty on the Lake Master Plan and selected design theme. The Architectural Design Committee shall use these guides to evaluate specific commercial site and building positions. 2. GOALS •Create a high quality "country village" consisting of neighborhood services and convenience services for commuters using residential scale structures. •Create as a gathering and meeting place for local resi- dents. •Use building massing, detail and color to emulate the impressions gained from the illustrations of Wysocki, Norman Rockwell, and The Field Guide to American Homes by Virginia & Lee McAlester. This setting and style is known generally as colonial and includes vari- ants of English, Adam, Classical Revival, and Colonial Revival. These styles evolved in the New England region and from this point forward in this document will be referred to as "New England." 3. OBJECTIVES • Ensure buildings have complexity at a human scale, which can be enjoyed at a pedestrian pace. • Buildings should help define Liberty Square by fronting on this main social gathering space for the neighborhood. • All buildings should represent a consistency of mass- ing and detailing on all four sides. 4. APPROVAL BACKGROUND • The visual impact of one or all buildings is to not be the standard strip mall and or free standing stores surround- ed by parking, facing the highway, with blank wall/util- ity enclosure to sides and 'rear' . Rather, the approvals Canopies and tasteful, decoratively shaped & edged signs help inform and entertain. Page 2 Larger windows, awnings, varied roof alignments, canopies, and bracket mount- ed signage create a visually interesting place to be, and a place to which people will want to return. . One & two story buildings, which favor roof dormers, provide A.R.C. the p essence of New England style buildings. given by the Stillwater Town Board over 6 years ago, were based on the verbal picture that follows more less from this quote made in the pivotal Town Board approval meeting: "But what if the buildings looked like a (New England) country store", with gas "pumps under a roof that looks like a covered bridge, screened from the road by an in - theme building that hap- pens to be a car wash", with a country doctors office... And all build- ings front on a village green." • The approval came with the idea that the Board members' dislike was not for the "What" of the commercial use, but the "how" it was usually done. Each saw the positive value and convenience of the services being close by, but their resistance was due to a precon- ceived notion of how commercial buildings, parking and grounds 'always look'... would look. The problem was, therefore, not the "what", it was the "how"... how the buildings would be positioned, massed, detailed and signed. • The underlying family partners/property owners, ancestors have owned the land since 1849 when Liberty Newman and his father gained homestead title to the land from the U.S. government. His grandfather fought in the revolutionary war; a Newman daughter married a Dows son, son of the man who rode, as did Paul Revere, to alert the country side of British military actions. Acquaintances from New England, the Masterman family, also came west and set- tled across the road from the Newman farm. The Masterman's rela- tives owned property next to the bridge in Concord, Vermont, where the revolutionary war began. • The street, New England Way, within Liberty Village names the theme of Liberty Village architecture. What does this mean for the plan and design of each Liberty Village Building? • Adhere to the spirit and the letter of the guidance of the concept and preliminary site plans that obtained the approvals for the con- venience store use. • Buildings must face both the highway frontage and the parallel parking & sidewalks bracketing the Green. • Design floor plans that cause the stores, offices, businesses to ori- ent to both Liberty Square and the perimeter road frontage and bor- dering parking. • Side walk seating and recessed accesses should invite drivers and pedestrians from t-le Village Green side of the buildings. • The desired aspect of added in-store security, gained by views into the stores, will be served by customer activity, presence & movement from the Liberty Square side of the building and perimeter parking areas. Proper pedestrian access and windows facing the sidewalks and parallel parking on the green will encourage and enable more of the desired customer access and visual scrutiny. Decorative facade, cornice trim of frieze, crown mold and symmetrical, paralleled window positions. Decorative, formal, themed signage accent simple building elevations. Page 3 LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC STRUCTURES... Right: Liberty's clock tower shows the stone/break off block in limestone color, red brick, crown mold details, and roof cupola. Left: The booster pump building shows materials of red brick, white trim, a cupola vent, nar- row overhangs, & ide frieze. Heritage Square's gazebo (behind the mail structure) uses tradi- tional doric round columns & exposed beams below the soffit & lattice. 0 0, o r.,„0 \ , /A R. E�q �uwq I�-- LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT Above: The walk bridge to school shows the New England detailing of steep pitch roofs, flush gable rakes, & picket fences. Right: The school's architecture employs brick ele- ments "anchoring" the cedar shingle- clad, gable roof ele- ments. Left: Square columns support steeply pitched roof with narrow rakes & overhangs, bracket traditional light fixture. Colors of picket fence and trim unify archi- ecture of landscape elements. Page 4 LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOMES... LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT.. . VARIETY, WITHIN THE HOME. LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOMES... LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT... VARIETY, WITHIN THE HOME A.R.C. GUIDELINES ILLUSTRATIONS AND ELEVATIONS Concept Aerial Sketch: View of Liberty Village buildings north of pond m Liberty Square. Bank is at Right LIBERTY VILLAGE Preliminary building Elevations: Building #3, studying massing, style and colors. Note New England/Colonial style for signage adaptations. Concept Sketch Elevations of Building #3 (Office/Retail/Live-Work), and Building #4 (Bank) at right, ith steep -pitched main roof elements, flush rake overhangs, symmetrical window treatments, some with shutters. See illustration below Signage and Business Identity is critical for success. Appropriate themed sign design, detail and placement help bring preliminary Building #3 Elevation "Alive". Facing Manning Avenue, Elevation drawing shows decorative signs mounted on walls, roofs, brackets and canopies. Page 7 RECOMMENDED: Varied massing, angled positions, and openings for pedestrians help attract customers. RECOMMENDED: Inset entry, signs on brackets, & larger windows create visual/social interest. Note- Vertical emphasis of design. NOT RECOMMENDED: Tight sidewalk width restricts com- fortable use of dinning tables & prevents sidewalk trees with tree grates. 5. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND SITE CONSIDERATIONS Within the context of separately owned buildings and lots, the structures are to be positioned and connected to create as much "shops -on -a -green" impression as possible. Setbacks of buildings from the front prop- erty line will only be allowed for pedestri- an oriented activities, such as seating, spe- cific landscaping elements or outdoor activity areas. These dimensions can be very sensitive. Anticipating future poten- tial sidewalk dining requires careful antic- ipation of tree grates, pedestrian move- ment, and table placement. Because the buildings also face highways 12, 15 and the Green, they must present themselves attractively on all sides. Pathway or sidewalk connections will be made between buildings, parking and site features. The parking areas must be visually divid- , ed into smaller elements via planted medi- ans, islands, grade changes and/or plant- ed berming. 6. BUILDING MASSING Overall architecture and landscape archi- tecture is to be united with a "New England" design character. This style is characterized by an emphasis on narrow and varied width shop fronts with sepa- rate identities obtained by trim, siding and facade changes. Structures are to be relat- ed by this style through individual build- ings or portions of buildings should be varied, with the style colonial "New England." RECOMMENDED: While extra parking lies to the other side of this building, the shops face both a village green and parallel parking out front. Provide sufficient width for comfortable side- walk uses. The vertical window treatments, and building variety of older main streets, are inspiration for Liberty Village. Page 8 RECOMMENDED: Multiple levels with recesses, canopies, & sidewalks create interest and draw customers. 7. BUILDING FRONTS Ground level expression and entries: Display or shop windows are provided at grade level to display merchandise and provide pedestrian interest. They should occupy 60 percent of the front facade, and aid in defining the entrance to the building. Windows, other than display or shop windows, should have a vertical empha- sis. ▪ • The design of the building should help • make the street enjoyable, visually inter- esting and comfortable. Individual buildings should be integrated with the streetscape to bring activity within the building in direct contact with the people g on the street. 0 8. BUILDING HEIGHT 9. ROOF DESIGN Roofs of the primary structure must slope at 8:12 or greater. Porches, entries, and shelters can have flat, 3:12, or 4:12 pitches. Dormers with slopes 90° to the primary roof pitch should be 12:12. Shingles should be thicker butt, heavier weight, style asphalt in weathered grey shades or cedar shingles or composite materials emulating slate. Large expans- es of roof should be broken by dormers and offsets. RECOMMENDED: Even at one story height, the use of pedestrian scale lighting, signage, and canopy help make this an attractive place. NOT RECOMMENDED: The facades and columns lack style references. Page 9 NOT RECOMMENDED: Mixture of traditional shutters with more contemporary standing seam metal facade addition send conflicting style messages. NOT RECOMMENDED: Flat roof expressed by absence of cornice or other archi tectural features. Random positioning of awnings and signs. 10. FRANCHISE ARCHITECTURE Franchise architecture represents those build- ings designed in such a way as to make the services or goods sold immediately recogniza- ble through the use of a specific mix of architec- tural design, signage design, materials, light intensity & type, and colors of the building. These were first developed on or near high- speed freeways where taking the time to read a sign would be too difficult. Such designs are generally in conflict with the characteristics of pedestrian oriented commercial storefronts, and a village of shops, unified by a theme. • Trademark architecture is prohibited. 11.. MATERIALS Finish wall materials shall consist of brick, wood (cement board products allowed - such as James Hardie products), stone and glass. Site amenities, sign base structures and retain- ing structures shall utilize similar and comple- mentary building materials and New England design themes to further establish a unifying visual link between site and structures. 12. DETAILING Siding, trim, soffits, frieze and fascia materials should be of James Hardie "Hardi Plank, Hardi trim, Hardi Soffit" or approved equal, of hori- zontal bevel style , or in limited use, board and batten, and or shingles. Masonry materials should be focused on col- umn supports, masses emulating fireplace masses, or veneers on building masses repre- senting the "original structure", to which other "later additions" appear attached, and of clap- board siding. Masonry materials can also be used on components and signage supports close and visually prominent to the streets and sidewalks. NOT RECOMMENDED: Back -Lit, internally lit signs, metal canopies. NOT RECOMMENDED: Overly strong colors, striped awnings, dutch hip roof. RECOMMENDED:Varied building faces & levels. Roof top equipment is screened. Page 10 S RECOMMENDED: Surfaces made interesting through architectural detailing. Recesses and ruches provided to allow customers a place to linger outside. Lighting, integrated with attractive signage sized for the pedestrians. RECOMMENDED: Columns, canopies, and visual interest. 13. SCREENING OF ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT • Screen exterior transformers and air conditioning units from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a man- ner that is compatible with the building and site design. • All roof equipment shall be screened from public view. • Use architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment. 14. UTILITY AREAS • Screen exterior trash receptacles, storage areas, service yards, and loading areas, from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with the building and site design. Use materials and design treatment similar to buildings and "New England" style. Provide plant material to augment screening and blending into landscape. Integrate more uses into structure, such as signage, trellis, ect. 15. LIGHTING Lighting can add special character to the nighttime appear- ance of the area. It can illuminate building entrances, pedes- trian walkways, and advertising or floodlight special build- ings. However, if left without consideration of the entire Liberty Village experience, unchecked lighting can produce visual chaos, waste energy, create safety concerns, and impose upon the adjacent residents. • A coordinated lighting plan should be submitted for review with building plans. Provide information on each individual light fixture proposed, including fixture sections, lamp type, wattage, and photometric diagram. • Ceiling and wall mount lighting fixtures should be con- cealed or integrated into the overall design of the project. Light source should be hidden from direct pedestrian or motorist view or directed in a such a way that minimizes glare. • Traditional post and bracket mounted fixtures compatible in style with the "Vernon" style street lights should be select- ed. • Unshielded wall pack light fixtures are not appropriate. • Up -spots into boulevard and perimeter trees is encouraged. Provide weatherproof outlets at trees to enable holiday lighting. RECOMMENDED: Signage sized for visibility for customers driving by. Use of facade and cornice treatment on flat roofs. NOT RECOMMENDED: Strip center design with unbroken rows of parking spaces, sidewalks too narrow to allow sidewalk tree planting. Windows covered with sign placements. NOT RECOMMENDED: Severe color contrasts, internally lit letters. RECOMMENDED: Theme related architecture(but not this theme), masonry construction, and planing. Page 11 NOT RECOMMENDED: Wall mounted signs, internally lit signage, sidewalks without canopy trees, arbitrary shapes, material changes without detailing. 16. SIGNS AND GRAPHICS A key to the financial viability, vitality, civic interest and "pedestrian friendli- ness" of Liberty Village will be deter- mined by its signs. A reference to the Charles Wysocki illustration at left, records the use of signs that bring life to a village of shops and the conservative architecture of the colonial "New England" style. Signage for Liberty Village is positioned in a variety of places on monuments or on out buildings, on trellis/arbor ele- ments, on building wall/roof surfaces, on brackets, on canopies, on light posts, and in windows. In each case, the selection of type face, • size, graphic symbol, color, detailing, and l• ights are important to achieving A.R.C. s approval. Internally lit or translucent let- • tering is not acceptable. • The Liberty Village site plan has pre- determined perimeter sign locations and will allocate spaces for each owner/ten- ant. •All signage lighting is to be by reflected light either off the sign face, or off the let- ter/sign background, silhouetting the letters. • Lettering is to be of an approved type face except by individual approval by A.R.C. Above: Good example of directory signage for a multi -tenant building. Projecting signs with appropriate materials, size, shape, and location. Page 12 BRINE 2l l l i l l l l l g111111'0 01111110Tal1 r STREET SIGNAGE EXAMPLES DOWNTOWN STILLWATER, MN LIBERTY VILLAGE Page 13 FONT CANDIDATE SELECTIONS LibertyVilidge 2?i4e241`l' • i Alison IL -13,LRTY VIT ,LAGE Castellar MT Liberty Village New Century LibortyWillow Liberty Village Times LIBERTY VILLAGE Capitals Liberty Village Bodoni Liberty village Talon Liberty Village Minion Lthe1zTy Vi La C Oxford Liberty Village Lydian MT LibertjV, lia�e Ltbert)/✓ Vt&qe Caflisch Lilb xe lrt\y \Vflll]lagce Viva Calrton LIBERTY VILLAGE Liberty Village L15[flTY VILLAG[ Liber[y Village Liberty Village R3eriy rllay J.te.r&1 YtPPs- Lbert2 �ill�ge /d,'4-7."(4 »rtij W(ac:e Tyndale Parrish Ambient Dard Hunter Salon J Hopper da Vinci Victorian Cezanne E Hopper Michelangelo Dearest Page 13A RECOMMENDED: Well proportioned neon signs in windows. Steady pitched 12:12 awnings in tasteful color(s) that respond to architectural detailing and window shapes. RECOMMENDED: Signs mounted on walls (or roofs), with type sized for reading at a com- mon viewing distance from a car, or on the street to walk to store fronts. Signage placement on/behind windows must not exceed 25% of window surface. Lettering on awning valances. 17. AWNINGS • Retractable or operable awnings are encouraged. Fixed awnings should mimic the profile of operable units (one to one pitch). • The emphasis of the awning should remain one of shelter and protection, rather than signage. In keeping with this; the awning should be loose and flowing, not stretched tight, subtle and subdued in color, not bright, extending well out over the sidewalk, not mere window dressing. • The width of awnings should fit the geometry of the building facade. They should not extend across multiple store- fronts of different buildings, but should reflect the window or door openings below. • The use of water-repellent or vinyl - coated canvas is in keeping with awnings of the time. Plastic or aluminum awnings or canopies are not appropriate. • Fixed, round -headed awnings will be considered only over arched windows or doors, and only if placed below or within the arched lintel. • The awning valance, or skirt, shall be proportioned to the size of the awning but shall not exceed twelve (12) inches in height. • Signing on awnings is permitted on the end panel (lower 25% of the slope) or front valance only. Use lettering size pro- portional to the space available. • Back lighting of the awnings is inap- propriate. • Use plain or striped fabrics. Large areas of very bright colors are inappropriate. RECOMMENDED: Canopy colors and angles help bring visual interest, variety, and shelter to the shopper. Page 14 RECOMMENDED: Canopies, umbrellas in public spaces create "civic" spaces. Lingering invited. RECOMMENDED: Even strong colors in carefully selected shades work well in bringing a gathering place to life. 18. COLORS The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already established by adja- cent buildings. The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the indiscriminate use of colors and color combinations can over- load the senses and produce visual con- flict and chaos. Exercise caution in the use of colors and tone combinations and their patterns. The goal is to achieve an area -wide complementary blend of back- ground colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and focal colors. • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious though varied effect. • Avoid colors, which visually overpow- er or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established color schemes as a whole. • The color of brick or other natural building materials should dictate the color family choice. • Sign colors are a significant source of interest, contrast and accent. • Actual color samples of the materials to o be used must be of sufficient size to see at c a distance outside must be provided to the A.R.C. Page 15 19. PARKING Parallel parking will be provided between the front of the building and Liberty Square (refer to site plan). These will be short-term spaces for easy accessibility to retail shops. Longer -term parking will be provided at the rear of the structures. Parking quantities will be based on performance -based industry stan- dards. A reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces may be allowed in the case of shared park- ing areas, if peak operation times are different and parking quantities are supported by substantiated industry standard of specific vendor "proof of parking" performance operational data. A reduction on one (1) parking space from the number of required off-street parking spaces may be approved for each on -street parking space at the lot frontage on a public street, provided sufficient sidewalk street furniture and street facing design, detail and signage are provided. 20. BICYCLE PARKING Bike racks should be provided in appropriate locations to encourage exercise and non -vehicular use. Each site in Liberty Village should provide a location and rack. 21. STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS Store operators are required to include spaces and "street furniture" such as benches, game/picnic tables, drinking fountains as well as walk up windows to dispense products during summer months. Inevitably, this will lead to RECOMMENDED: Sheltering porches, columns bring interest to conservative main building mass and roof detail. Page 16 RECOMMENDED: Tree grates enable boulevard tree use. Canopies and awnings offer a pedestrian orientated urban setting. ©2003 Putman PI added litter and 'loitering." Properly designed store interiors, that enhance store attendants focus to be directed to these out- door spaces, will do much to quietly govern civic behavior. The decision to create the pedestrian -friend- ly community of Liberty on the Lake is in part, a commitment to build and maintain the public and semi-public spaces to which pedestrians are drawn. To object to main- taining these, once one has decided to build in Liberty, is to forget one of its attractions and source of added value. Store owner/operators should anticipate added exterior upkeep both through their Liberty Village Shops on the Square Association, and sustain their individual upkeep budgets. Crosswalks are to be provided where shown on the site plan. Varied paving colors/paint with crosswalk signage is a minimum treat- ment. Paving texture changes are encour- aged. 22. LANDSCAPING • Highlight important architectural features and structures by use of distinctive land- scaping. • Visually and physically buffer parking lots from adjacent buildings and pedestrian walkways with groupings of plant materi- als. • Frame and edge buildings where feasible ▪ with appropriate types of plant material to achieve human scale. • Carefully locate street trees and shrub plantings to buffer and separate walkways from traffic. Create shade where needed for pedestrian and establish more clearly defined pedestrian use areas. Distinctive architectural styling is enhanced by the careful placement of street trees and "street furnishing." Page 17 RECOMMENDED: Street trees soften architectural features and provide enclosure/safe- ty for pedestrians. • Establish where practical, canopy trees to pro- vide shade for parked cars. Tree planting in park- ing lot islands will reduce heat gain and should be encouraged. • Avoid blocking sight lines to primary building signage. This can be accomplished through prop- er plant species selection and/or trimming/pruning. • Each liberty Village owner is responsible for adhering to the master planing plan for the street trees and perimeter planing requirements when specific site building and sign plans are present- ed to A.R.C. • Minimum boulevard tree size is 3" cal. Minimum shrub size is 2' ht. Planting must meet or exceed American Nursery Standards. • Avoid eye level vegetation foliage at cross- walks and at street corners through proper plant specification and.or pruning/trimming. 23. MANAGEMENT CPDC employs an activities director to help initi- ate and advocate social activities, groups, and functions. This person also helps put in place sys- tems to be run by the Home Owners Association, once control goes to the residents. An equally well organized and active store owners associa- tion should be initiated and eventually received control by the store owners/tenants. - Separate and joint efforts of these groups can then organize activities and gatherings for Liberty Village and its Pavilion. Steve Russell, Stillwater Community Development Director has spoken for the need for locations for civic gatherings that currently go wanting for space.'rz Such activities would cause more activity to be p„ focused on the green...Liberty Square. This will help the shops gain added public presence, and become part of an occasional destination, in addition to a convenient stop. This typically enhances business revenues, and provides free advertising. Page 18 "NEW ENGLAND" COLONIAL STYLES: GEORGIAN MASSING, DETAILS A FIFI .11 GUIDE TO AVIERIC\ TiE. GUIDE THAT ENARTFS YOU ID ID PLACE IN THEIR ILSTORIC AND. ARCHTIECFURAI. CONTEXTS, THE HOUSES YOU SEE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD OR.LN YOUR TRAVELS. ACROSS ANTERICA—HOUSES BUILT FOR .A_,SIFRICAN FAMILIES (RICH, POOR, AND IN-BETWEEN), IN CITY AND COUNTRYSIDE, FROM THE 1711I CENTURY TO, THE PRESENT VIRGINIA & I ,FE MCALESTER 00000 00000 00(000 000 000 oon Alabama (�rorgia 0CIPAL SETTLED AREAS, 1780 000 000 000 CHARLESTON HOUSE abort side mimed to street, galleries along on 00000 00n00 York dingy:6.Y N Castle OW 0 0 n 0 mouth msburg oHalk dmington ties Town (Charleston) bah •pn 'ql towns e �tDea comb Fries. to6II Kagan, 1966 Chitwood, to6t U U U 0n0 / \ / 00000 00100 0000000 000RO00 BH86n 00 D0 0 00 DOD Dro COMMON NORTHERN VARIANTS wally wood frame, upper window touches cornice two-story examples MIDDLE COLONIES usually stone or brick, most northern and southern variants founde bore COMMON SOUTHERN VARIANTS usually brick, raised foundation. bch course hctwern stories (also on northern masonry examples) 000 00 00n00 0000 000 D0 MOST (MMMON IN NORTHERN COLONIES gambrel COMMON ONLY IN MIDDLE COLONIES side -gabled, dosed or pcdimented MOST COMMON IN SOUTHERN COLONIES AND IN HIGH -STYLE EXAMPLES, ALL, ODIONIES double -hipped hipped ROOF SHAPE MOST COMMON IN NORTHERN COLONIES central chimney IMNEY PLACEMENT COMMON IN ALL COLONIES COMMON IN SOUTHERN AND MIDDLE COLONIES paired interior paired end paired double chimneys chimneys interior chimneys FOUND NTE EXAMEL.sIu COLONIES pared double end chimneys BUILDING MASSING AND WINDOW PATTERN mz = 4 pa common .ter. CD O 0 0 0 0' do I surround or light romm Ae JJIJ.r...L=Adamcsque _ common ,,. off o on00 0 .00 00 00 . ram, raM EODE 00 l:0O, t Off_ Y0 0: :00 10_ i �'����. _i itr�p i00i iDDi_ lII cemrytmo ao 00 ooI LL_ 11 1.00++�I.jt oo , 001-1 .., 0 El L Do 00 JIjJ1 nmm E 0 D ,trim m1ii!i[ ENTRIES Page 19 COLONIAL: "NEW ENGLAND" STYLE VARIATIONS & DETAILS , 3,3 3313.331333•737.:.1'1'..‘3'''''' GREEK REVIVAL .4,44M wiNuum. 1.1/11.1M GEORGIAN DETAILS EMIL! 00 TWO-STORY ZN CLASSIC REVIVAL MASSING OW:STORY GABLE MONT AND WINGS ,7S NOTE: Note the shallow overhang & frieze at the gable & almost flush overhang at the rake. WINDOW TREATMENTS soloctot. Ina0 3.333.3,out WI /NI we...3313r. uu 000 000 9,9 no. p.,131A oau burn colonic, 1111 MOM MON 11111111 i..i IIUII H-11 6/ , 11/ r 33m1 9/6 iXIMOII M041,5pular 01,-en rninnies 51. Ltyvone lintel 13a$ 11.1,1 6i6 cormulou. 1 4- .3/, au313331333 33...34,33.1.34o44a .4 13 occur Cu, x33,13,113 331, VINDON C.D.SIPAHISONS: (13:033(31A 1, 33 ADAM 11110-1 VO.4111, uuDou1333.rrn 33x 1333no'Nus, 3333ou3333 13314333 333. 333,3133,1331133A333. 3.,11,3393,9.93931. 11,3.3131ecoratuu Adam conutui Page 20 Symmetrical window positioning for each building front is typical of New England/Colonial styles. Roof pitches are steeper and roofs have shallow gable overhangs and flush or very shallow rake overhangs. Page 21 PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for : Glossary Baluster: A short post in a series supporting a handrail and thus forming a balustrade. Balustrade: A hand railing or upright posts or balusters. Bay: An outward projection of a wall with windows, or a division in a wall seen as space between piers or columns. Blocking Course: The plain course of stone surmounting the cornice at the top of the building; also a projecting cornice of stone or brick at the base of a building. Canopy: A projection or hood over a door, window, niche, etc. Capital: The head or crowning feature of a column. Cladding: An external covering or skin applied to a structure for aesthetic or protective purposes. Column: An upright member, designed to carry a load. Concrete: Cement mixed with coarse and fine aggregate (such as pebbles, crushed stone, brick) , sand and water in specific proportions. Coping: A capping or covering to a wall, either flat or sloping to throw off water. Corbelling: Brick of masonry courses, each built out beyond the one below like a series of corbels to support a projections, windows, etc. Cornice: Any projecting ornamental molding along the top of a building, wall, etc., fin- ishing or crowning it. Dentils: Small brick blocks or toothed wood decorative members found in classical or period architecture in cornices, or other horizontal bands on building facades. Eaves: The under part of a sloping roof overhanging a wall. Elevation: The external faces of a building:, also a drawing made' in projection on a ver- tical plane to show any one face of a building. False Fronts: A vertical extension of a building facade above a roofline to add visual height. Fascia: A plain horizontal band, which may consist of two or three fascia over sailing each other and sometimes separated by narrow moldings. Fenestration: The arrangement of windows and doors in a building. Gable: The triangular part of an exterior wall, created by the angle of a pitched roof with two sides. LIBERTY VILLAGE Hipped Roof: A roof with pitched or sloped ends and sides, which rise from all four sides of a building. Lintel: A horizontal beam or member above a door or window, which supports the wall above the facade opening. Mullions: The frames of divisions within multi -pane windows. Muntin: The vertical part of a door, screen, paneling, etc., butting into, or stopped by, the horizontal rails. Parapet: A low wall, placed to protect any spot where there is a sudden drop, for exam- ple, a wall projecting above a roof plane. Pier: A solid masonry support, as distinct from a column, the solid mass between doors, windows, and other openings in buildings. Pilaster: A shallow pier or rectangular column projecting only slightly from a wall. Pillar: A freestanding upright member, which, unlike a column, need not be cylindrical or conform to any of the orders. Ridge: The horizontal line formed by the junction of two sloping surfaces of a roof. Sash: The frame, which holds window panels, and forms the movable part of the win- dow. Shutter: A rectangular wood or cast iron piece, set on hinges and used to cover a win- dow or door. Historically used for security orto protect window or door openings from natural elements. Sill: The lower horizontal part of a window -frame. Soffit: The underside of any architectural element. String Course: A continuous projecting horizontal band on a building facade usually made of molding (wood or plaster) or masonry. Page 22 S11 1 Iwatet THE BIRTHPLACE OF M I N N F S O T A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 08-55 APPLICANT: Vern Stefan, Mainstream Development REQUEST: Design review of roof top units on 227 Main St N LOCATION: 227 Main St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: July 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plannerct(3 DISCUSSION Mainstream Development Partnership, LLC has submitted roof top plans for their redevelopment project of 227 Main St N. This submittal represents the final Commission and/or Council approval they need before they receive their building permit from the City. The overall project represents the final phase of development on the former Maple Island Dairy Site. This phase relates to the hardware store and surface parking lot north of it. The proposed project is to demolish the hardware store and build about a 34,800 square foot mixed use building as follows: • Below grade parking for 30 vehicles • 13,000 gross square feet of office space on the ground floor. • 13,000 gross square feet of office space on the second floor. • 8,800 gross square feet of office space on the third floor ("penthouse" floor). 227 Main St N Page 2 ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives they could consider: A. Approval. If the proposed design plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could deny the request. With a denial the basis of the action should be given. C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the August 5, 2009 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is August 10, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the design permit with the following conditions: 1. The screening for the rooftop mechanical equipment and venting shall be as depicted in Sheet A 13 of the plan set dated June 10, 2009 with color and specifications as detailed in this staff report dated November 25, 2008. 2. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any signs on the project site. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director. The lighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit all required permits for building in the flood fringe and evidence from a licensed professional engineer or architect that all local, regional, state and federal flood fringe development regulations are being followed. 7. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be of a color that matches the adjacent surface. 8. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from Main Street. 9. All required landscaping shall be installed prior to final project inspection. DATE: APPLICANT: Mainstream Development Partnership, LLC REQUEST: Design Review for Phase III of Maple Island Dairy Redevelopment LOCATION: 227 North Main Street HPC REVIEW DATE: December 1, 2008 PREPARED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director November 25, 2008 CASE NO.: DR/08-55 BACKGROUND Mainstream Development Partnership, LLC is planning to develop a project referred to as 227 North Main Street. This would represent the final phase of development on the former Maple Island Dairy site. This phase relates to the hardware store and surface parking lot north of it. The proposed project is to demolish the hardware store and build about a 34,800 square foot mixed use building as follows: • Below grade parking for 30 vehicles • 13,000 gross square feet of office space on the ground floor • 13,000 gross square feet of office space on the second floor • 8,800 gross square feet of office space on the third floor ("penthouse" floor) Public participation in the planning of this project has a rich history. A synopsis of that history is presented in the table below. Date Board Case No. Action 5/8/06 PC 06-12 Denial of variance and other requests for four-story building (1st version) 6/20/06 CC 06-12 Denial of appeal, without prejudice (building had been reduced to three stories after PC denial of variance — 2nd version) 7/5/06 HPC DEM 06- Approved demolition permit with condition that Final Design Permit 04 must be as •roved by HPC: before demo permit is effective 7/5/06 HPC DR 06-19 Approval of Preliminary Design Permit (three-story building — 2nd version) 7/10/06 PC 06-38 Approval of private parking facility SUP; approval of parking variance (two-story building; 3rd version) 7/ 18/06 CC 06-38 Approval of parking lot easement vacation contingent upon providing a public restroom 227 Main St N Page 3 10. No trash enclosures are planned to be located outside. Therefore, no trash enclosures or trash bins will be allowed without prior approval of the HPC. 11. All construction activity shall conform to the City's noise ordinance. Construction during dry periods shall mitigate dust problems. 12. All minor modifications to the final design review permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 13. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate street parking areas from landscape areas. 14. Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project. 15. Any of the brick pavers that are disrupted along Main Street shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. 16. Any of the street lights that are disrupted shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. 227 North Main Street November 25, 2008 Page 2 of 5 1/7/08 HPC DR 07-52 Approval of Final Design Permit (two-story building; 3rd version) 4/14/08 PC 06-38 Planning Commission approves extension of variance and SUP for one year to 7/10/09 5/6/08 CC Approved agreement for public restroom 5/7/08 Demolition permit became effective 10/6/08 HPC DR 08-50 Approval of Final Design Permit (three-story building with gable; 4th version) 11/14/08 HPC DR08-55 Application filed for Final Design Permit (three-story freestanding building flat roof; 5th version of building) The developer appeared before the Heritage Preservation Commission on May 1, 2006, June 5, 2006, July 5, 2006, January 1, 2008 and October 6, 2008. Over the course of those meetings, the actions taken by the commission were: 1) approval of the preliminary design permit for the three story building with gable roof; 2) approval of the final design permit for the two story version of the building; and 3) approval of the final design permit for a three story version with gable roof. This is the fifth version of the building seen by the public. This version has three stories with a flat roof, and is separated from the remainder of the Maple Island building by three feet. The Final Design Permit that was approved for the fourth version of the building in October was also for a three-story structure, but it had a gable roof and was an irlfill building. The fourth version would have required a variance in order to construct, since it would have been 52 feet tall to the top of the roof. The public hearing before the Planning Commission for that variance request was tabled, and given the public testimony and discussion, the fourth version of the building was set aside by the developer. The building height of this, the fifth version of the building, is 37 feet tall measured from sidewalk to top of parapet, and requires no other City approvals except the Final Design Permit and a building permit. SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to build the current version of the building, Mainstream Development has requested approval of a Final Design Permit. EVALUATION OF REQUEST This property is located within the City's historic downtown district. Consequently, the design standards found in the Design Manual, Commercial Historic District apply to the project. The applicable pages of the Design Manual are attached. In addition to the Design Manual, the Downtown Plan also offers design and development standards for the property. The Downtown Plan identifies the property as Special Site #6. The design guidelines for the special site are also attached. 227 North Main Street November 25, 2008 Page 3 of 5 City Staff offers the following comments: 1. In general the level of detail that has been submitted is at a pre building permit stage. The building is primarily brick with copper cornice, aluminum store front glass/doorways with other architectural elements. 2. Full size architectural and civil engineering drawings will need to be submitted for review prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff will review the final plans submitted for a building permit for consistency with the plans currently before the Commission. 3. The massing of the revised building is compatible with the buildings already on the block. Even with the penthouse third story, the view from the street will be the same as the previously approved two story building. 4. The building materials and architectural elements of the current building are much the same as the version of the building that received approval in October 2008. The only difference is the roof type and the three foot building separation. Since the previous version was generally acceptable to the Heritage Preservation Commission and to City staff, this version would also seem to be acceptable. 5. With a flat roof instead of a gable roof, venting and mechanical equipment will no longer be hidden internally. As can be seen in Sheet Al and the colored rendering that are attachedl, the flat roof will be home to five -ton rooftop mechanical units (RTUs), venting and access -hatches. With the exception of the access hatches, the equipment and venting will be screened. The six RTUs will be three feet tall and the vent pipes will be 24 inches tall. The screening will be either 42 or 48 inches tall. The color of the RTUs will be standard mechanical green and the venting will be painted to match the washed river rock covering the flat roof. The screening will be prefinished metal with a dark greenish patina copper color. A sample will be available at the Commission meeting. 6. The fence/gate securing the three foot wide building separation will be 10 feet tall. The material will be black wrought iron spaced three inches on center. The top will be curved out to deter climbing. The bottom will be three inches off the ground. 7. A general lighting plan was submitted by the applicant. Staff recommends that the Commission make a condition of approval that the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. Staff has made this a condition of the approval. The colored rendering and Sheet Al show differing configurations of rooftop equipment and venting. Sheet Al is correct. 227 North Main Street November 25, 2005 Page 4 of 5 ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives they could consider: A. Approval. If the proposed design plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they should be approved. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the January 5, 2009 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is January 13, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Since a design permit was approved by the HPC and issued by the City for both the two-story and the three-story gable version of this project, staff recommends approval of the design permit for this version as well, with the following conditions: 1. No rooftop venting or other penetrations are allowed except those specifically shown on Sheet Al of the plan set dated November 14, 2008. 2. The screening for the rooftop mechanical equipment and venting shall be as depicted in Sheet Al of the plan set dated November 14, 2008 with color and specifications as detailed in this staff report dated November 25, 2008. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any signs on the project site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director. The Iighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected from damage by vehicles. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 7 Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit all required permits for building in the flood fringe and evidence from a licensed 227 North Main Street November 25, 2008 Page 5 of 5 professional engineer or architect that all local, regional, state and federal flood fringe development regulations are being followed. 8. All gutters, downspouts, fleshings, etc. shall be of a color that matches the adjacent surface. 9. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from Main Street. 10. All required landscaping shall be installed prior to final project inspection. 11. No trash enclosures are planned to be located outside. Therefore, no trash enclosures or trash bins will be allowed without prior approval of the HPC. 12. All construction activity shall conform to the City's noise ordinance. Construction during dry periods shall mitigate dust problems. 13. All minor modifications to the final design review permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 14. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate street parking areas from landscape areas. 15. Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements, shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the project. 16. Any of the brick pavers that are disrupted along Main Street shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. 17. Any of the street lights that are disrupted shall be salvaged and reinstalled before final inspection of the project. attachments: Location Map Color rendering of building seen from Pioneer Park B&W renderings from Main Street and other views Excerpt from Downtown Plan Excerpt from Downtown Design Manual Application drawings t City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission December 1, 2008 ** EXCERPT ** Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Phil Eastwood, Gayle Hudak, Jeff Johnson, Larry Nelson and Roger Tomten Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Scott Zahren Chair Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. 08-55 Design review of final phase of Maple Island Development. Mainstream Development LLC, applicant. Vern and Tim Stefan of Mainstream Development were present. Mr. Lieberman noted this is the fifth version of the proposed building that has been presented to the HPC. The fifth iteration is a three story structure with a flat roof; the fourth version was a three story structure with a gable roof, but was an infill structure which would have required a height variance, he noted. Tim Kuntz, attorney representing Mainstream Development, stated this is the last major development for the former Maple Island site and the applicants are prepared to_ begin construction with this final approval. Mr. Kuntz noted that the HPC had approved the general design of the building on three occasions. He noted the exterior of the building has not changed; the only change from the last proposal is a flat roof versus a gable roof. He stated the applicant has reviewed the 17 conditions of approval and accepts and will meet those conditions. Mr. Lieberman noted that this is not an adversarial situation and it is "atypical" to have an attorney at the table. Mr. Lieberman pointed out that the HPC is not represented by counsel and asked Mr. Kuntz to step from the table and sit in the audience. Ms. Hudak told the Commission that Vern Stefan had contacted her by phone to remind her of the Dec. 1 meeting; other members indicated they, too, had been contacted by Mr. Stefan. Tim Stefan took Mr. Kuntz's place at the table. Mr. Stefan stated the site plan is unchanged, except the new building is now 4' away from the adjacent structure. He stated the materials also are the same — what has changed is the flat roof. Mr. Stefan reviewed the proposed building materials and colors. He said there will be a wrought iron fence between the new building and the adjacent building to the south. He said he is still concerned about the "punched down" appearance and is trying to keep as much volume as possible on the first floor. Mr. Nelson asked about trash storage. Mr. Stefan stated all trash would be enclosed inside. Mr. Johnson noted an error in elevation in one of the maps — should be 629 rather than 692. Mr. Johnson asked about the view from Pioneer Park. Mr. Stefan said they are trying to utilize geothermal heat and believes they will be able to keep the number of condenser units at 6 as shown in the drawings, but noted that mechanical design work has not been completed at this 1 time. Mr. Eastwood expressed a concern about the view from Pioneer Park and asked about the possibility of having a low sloped roof to provide better screening of roof top units. Mr. Lieberman asked how some type of roof structure for screening would impact the height restriction. Mr. Pogge pointed out the residents of Stillwater Mills are opposed to any variance for height. Mr. Stefan provided a sight section depicting the views from the Mills buildings, noting that only residents of the top floors will have their view impacted. Mr. Lieberman noted that this was not a public hearing but invited comments from the audience. George Nelson, resident of Stillwater Mills and member of the Mills board of directors, spoke of the loophole, a separation of 3' from the adjacent building, which allows the addition of another story. Mr. Nelson reiterated concerns made at previous discussions regarding the view of the structure to those driving into the City from the north; the view of the structure from the St. Croix River; and the approved parking variance. Mr. Nelson questioned what say the City has in the use and the viability of the project should the developers not be able fill the building with the proposed office use and revert to retail instead. Chris Angel, representing Dick and Judy Diedrich, residents of Stillwater Mills, was prepared to address the Commission. Mr. Lieberman reiterated his position regarding attorney participation in these proceedings and stated he would prefer that Mr. Angel not present any testimony. No other comments were received, and the discussion was returned to the table. There was additional discussion about the possibility of some type of roof structure to screen the mechanicals. Mr. Pogge noted that ultimately that issue is a discussion between the Planning Commission and HPC, and he pointed out the Planning Commission likely will be a "tough sell" for any height variance. Mr. Johnson suggested it might help views if the north -south dimension of the mechanicals are minimized; he suggested screening the equipment and keeping the mechanical placement to one-fourth of the building dimension so there is more of a mechanical penthouse, rather than having the units spread out on the rooftop. Tim Stefan said he thought that might be possible and said he would be willing to come back to the HPC with a roof plan. Mr. Tomten noted that the key to Mr. Johnson's suggestion is getting the mechanical design completed. Mr. Tomten also stated he did not think larger screening would be more advantageous regarding the view from Pioneer Park; he suggesting simply painting the equipment to match the roof. Ms. Hudak asked about the material/color of the garage doors. Tim Stefan said the doors will be insulated metal doors perhaps with several view windows and will be the same color green as the other building trim. Mr. Johnson asked about the color of the mechanical equipment and screening. Mr. Stefan said the mechanical equipment will be the same color as the roofing material and the screening will match the parapet color. Mr. Tomten asked about the rain garden. Mr. Stefan said the rain garden is in the final plans as it is a requirement of the Middle St. Croix Water Management Organization; he said he did not think the rain garden would impact the patio or stairs. Mr. Tomten moved to give final design approval as conditioned, striking conditions 1 and 2 with the condition that the applicant come back to the HPC with a plan indicating the number and location of rooftop units based on comments made at the meeting. Mr. Pogge asked if that was a requirement prior to issuance of a building permit; consensus was in the affirmative. Mr. Johnson asked about amending the motion to require that the mechanicals' be kept to one- fourth of the total building dimension. Mr. Tomten declined to formally amend his motion to 2 include that. Mr. Johnson asked that the applicant take that direction into consideration in developing the rooftop plan. Ms. Hudak seconded Mr. Tomten's motion; motion passed unanimously. On a question by George Nelson, Mr. Pogge told those in the audience, there is a 10-day time period in which to appeal this decision. Mr. Nelson reiterated several of his concerns, specifically concerns about the viability of the project and possible change in use and the parking variance. Mr. Pogge noted that any change in use would require the applicant to request such a change from the Planning Commission. Mr. Tomten spoke to the difficulty of trying to impose suburban parking requirements on a pre -automobile shopping district such as downtown Stillwater, and he spoke to the need for flexibility in order to ensure economic viability. 3 IlEOPERIE. I2&P 14T-W T.O. WREW WEL PERFORM REM WSW 4TA. PMAPF7 ELEVATION Tie WIT SWaur-- 7" \/\P?4i \/\/\/\ ° SECTION OROOF SCREEN DETAIL I/4` - 1.-e MULBERRY STREET Q 10 0 0 WATER STREET 41 140'-' 0 22 1g-V l r ROOF MEW E. 134-r. PERKIER TW. UV al. ROOF PLAN OREM 4 RIU 1 407 affla ma. marl r SID RR. GEM n n 400E PROM a. 134-V. POWDER 7, ( NO goals 18'-O `REFil NW. SIM-) t ROOF R&M EL 174'-r . PEiE7Et Tm. MAIN STREET diek Bo PIU 2 41W WIT) -PRVOL MR. WON" (MI 11.1:11 100P FORYPET EL 13P'-8 . Fammut rP 4- i z LL cn cn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LiJ w CC ram) i 1 z z CC 2 Oc zk' Q Q d 3 L� INvv)) � # hr.) Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 2, 2009 APPLICANT: Julie Armitage of Nutrition Revolution REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Nutrition Revolution LOCATION: 200 Chestnut St E COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District H P C DATE: July 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner; CASE NO.: 09-29 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for signage at 200 Chestnut St E for Nutrition Revolution. This site is within the Chestnut Building. The proposal includes two requested signs. The first is a new tenant identification sign on the multi - tenant sign at the corner of Myrtle and Second and the second is a building sign facing Second. The signs are proposed to contain the business name "Nutrition Revolution" with nutrition is green and revolution in blue. The building sign will also have their logo in green and blue and the words "Easy as...3, 2, 1" in green. Both signs will have a white background. The area for their sign on the multi -tenant sign is a 2 foot tall by 3 foot wide sign for a total of a six square foot sign. The building sign will be 58 inches tall by 48 inches wide for a total of 19.2 square feet. The number, locations and sizes of the signs are preexisting and as such can continue to be used. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. Jun 18 09 11:35a JUN-18-2009 10149 CORBETT GROUP LLC 425 347 7021 p.2 P.02/04 Location Address Ct►rs5+ �` - Nome '1?4 Prcry State 1 zip Address Attached are the following documents (Requited to be submitted with application) o Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to the he mounteJ on building is historictheilding, show art t e sign moUntie� elevation damage to the exterior and sign, Additionally, f the bus idirig. ng .; ❑ Design Review application (if required). AU signs in the Downtown Area and in the west Stillwater Eitt$irte'Ss Park rewire deg n review by HPC. Cdy Stillwater City A Iicattion far S n Permit Fee: $50.O0 community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 551:182 651-434-8820 Stale zip MN 55082 phone # S =n Details Sign Size: Dimensiort> 4 Setbacks: From Pra:rty Line From Hag Cotors, i . I '' ifiumination ■ Yes N O Declaration = Square Sign Height: (f( freestanding) From briveway1Parking Lot M3leriats: e It Yes, Type: that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the l hereby my knortify nd authorize t belief. t hereby authorhe City of Stillwater and any agent or eme off itt. t be , to edg the lropos'd site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is s. • - - L this =s t Permit # Conditions +or approval; Contraetor mu be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form is available at Saltwater City hall_ Remember to call Goober state One call at 6$1-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE seN Updated: September z�, zoos g: PlanningtFermsWtettication for Sign snit tfot i Case No: Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (Le. photos, sketches, etc) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION �y Address of Project OitcfnalS-�- Assessor's Parcel No.(98630 DO Li it) Zoning District c(-) Description of Project in detail "I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. S(C\r' Property Owner T r\f• Sxy v\ os!\i Representative S . f Mailing Address t41'1C__-1 Mailing Address City State Zip \iv iN City State Zip Telephone No. LD\3- 3 ,. 3 / Telephone No. ?L,q(,Q .ice 1 1 -T 1 ,9 vY'Y'1 � ►�l � J 9D- S:\Planning\design review permitwpd 13 1 9 I-FX April 12, 2002 Sign Dimensions are as follows: Exhibit A- sign on outside of building: Height 58 inches Width 48 inches Square feet 19.2 Interior portion of sign where Nutrition Revolution will appear: Height 38" Width 40" This is a sign that is preexisting. We are removing the old vinyl lettering and replacing with our lettering and logo. Not changing the size, rehanging, etc. Exhibit B- Sign listing all businesses in building Height 2 ft Width 3 ft 6 sq feet We propose for this to say Nutrition Revolution in the same colored lettering as other businesses (even though our picture has green and blue) Awnings Standard 6" letters in white We would use same letters and have nutrition, smoothies, tea, and wellness nu""-riTion e • �Etsetit k u a',. t ... ti11watr 'HE 8 1 R+ H Y: A C ,. OF M; N N E S 0 1 A Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: July 2, 2009 APPLICANT: Laurel Anderson of Garnet Real Estate Services REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for Garnet Real Estate Services LOCATION: 105 New England Place #140 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: NC - Neighborhood Commercial ZONING: VC - Village Commercial HPC DATE: July 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner CASE NO.: 09-31 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 105 New England Place, Suite 140. This site is within the multi -tenant building in the Liberty commercial area. The sign is proposed to contain the business name "Garnet" in black lettering and "Real Estate Services" and "Sales and Management" in white letters. The sign will contain the colors of white, black, gray, and Burgundy. The sign will be lit with existing downcast building lights. The proposed sign is 68" by 52" for a total area of 24.6 square feet. For retail storefront signs the Village Commercial District building signs '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 26 feet long facing Manning Ave. The total sign area of the proposed sign is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 105 New England Place #140 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage. FINDINGS The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building GARNET Al ESTATE SERV GARNET REAL ESTATE SERVICES P.O. Box 2308 Stillwater, MN 55082 LETTER OF INTENT July 19, 2009 Community Development Department City of Stillwater 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 To whom it may concern: We are submitting an application for a sign permit accompanied by the required information and documentation requested by the Community Development Dept. We are requesting that a permit be issued for a sign to be placed at the Liberty Village location of 105 New England Place, Suite 145. We have a Real Estate and Property Management Company and are leasing space at this location. We wish to have a sign placed to identify our business at the location. This sign has been professionally designed and sized to occupy the same space as the previous tenant and adhere to the city guidelines. This sign does not contain any elements requiring a variance. Thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Laurel Anderson Garnet Real Estate Services 612-810-0001 Application for Sion Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430 8820 Location of Sign Address Gify io5 ?J w E N61,fi r./r A 145 Stillwater state Ztp MN 55082 Applicant acre • ftR11iE%fYifINA6E�E1►rT�,Rr vt_? f It i? Phone* (rl� - 8 io - pD b i 230t c' 1h�LWATEP - saki �'3 ODD Owner (If different from Applicant) 1"iher4-- Vi'Ii(.v t Zvi 1c-t,y4Ec, 0R£'c_r‹.. qc, ".m)l-is 9 Address t z, . Cit )�-tF3r nic e,LJ1 id I cc— -' PRA11-)C State Zip `"\tv `�55'1 Contractor's Name Name-T.6 , f-4AuS et i,` S T1V =4G_ i 1 0 t`ig IN6 , Pree 1, iLl 8'1 -0 i ={s arZn1 CSF ,1 CiIla.-i4?a_� State , Zip— —.f ism s5elo.-- Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application) o Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require desicm review bvv HPC. Sign Details Sign Slze: Dimensions: 6$" X 52" = Square Feet 24 5 tt Sign Height (If freestanding) Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg From Driveway/Parking Lot Colors: Burgundy, Black, & White Materials: MDO, printed graphics, 3/8" acry Illumination: jil Yes ❑ No HYes' Tom' Existing Building Lights Declaration hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true. correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and lady t hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it issued r iri•.-F�- oth e,rrt ; • / :e (.1 nature roposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is �yI/4i°7 Review (Foroffice use only) Approved ❑ Denied Date 8y D- Date(c- /9. Permit* Conditions for approval: ` Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application norm is available at Stillwater City Hail_ Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. S:tPlanningtForms\App&cattnn tor Sign Permit -Ow Updated: September 23, 2006 lic letters [ME ti! myaeV l5 U ?if EDLLSWThOlikl FrOf ilvj NVJU I sift"' DEVELOPMEM DEPASZTNEM7 CCTV OF STILLVIATIER 226 MOM MIRTH STREET Case Rio: Date Med?. Recebt The apPgIczwt fresponeuble Tor tip eonwastenew and accuraty c aflil Cyr, rend suppoirUng c 9mgbmkted an =mutton min anv aggioNoVion. f1 C suppoanj nutedIM (a.e, photw, SPA ) ad�� n u ed apiplaonifoo tsr-avazio the peaty t ke StEillfioaffna. tofi . a' grfros E Gar e late& is ren (13) coiv of MO sitz clsA3 ELM Grapand. All following information is ma . jog stew 67nl6(44 h Pime Address of Project 6 IA re. 1 ys Assessor's Parcel No. tau) Zoning District Description of Project in detail Building mounted 68"x52" MDO sign with raised acrylic letters Proposed sign conforms to sign ordinance. Existing light fixtures used. lterebystate the foregoing statements and all data, !Iflb rnatJon and evideo submitted herewith In all respects, by the best of my knowledge and be/4 to true and correct, I further cle wilt comps „;the pennitifitIspanted and used° If representative is not praparty owner, then property owner's signature is c., bJ e✓+y (.411 54. i L 1444 N At3v7 E-1vT 69 o oP; ) hl c , Property Owner rn s e-u ac-..t- GcL r tative L. t�t)4't L A A n xSu sT Mailing Address 14 8'sv Seen i, 1)et5lis Mailing Address P. 0. ►3Ok. 2 30 city State Zip PLL.i:o t rh--) 55$-ly {may State Zip 7/ .1 L)A ft-it , rvl n.) SS ii 2 Telephone No. a's 2- - St?, - 41°t % Telephone No. Le !O - / 0 -- CSC 0 f Signature (// Sigrtatu t LACI f Z' i trYU (Required) (Required) H;\mcnamara\shetia\2005\design review permit.wpd )uly 13, 2005 , rImmg - 6u!pI!n9 Jo aDe j up 6u!p!S pooh peal -I palu!ed inn mans pals ssalu!els hi o N o o ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z BUfl BUILDING FACE DING FACE TO INCLUDE BOTH ADJACENT BUILDINGS Description of Sign Elements PRINTED MDO SIGN: Custom dome shaped 68"x52"x1/2" single sided digitally printed and laminated sign. Edges sealed and painted. Custom 11 tall x 1/2" thick black laser cut acrylic letter readings "GARNET" attached to sign face. 1/2" thick burgundy laser cut acrylic 19.75"x3" burgundy logo piece. Total sign area is 24.6 square feet. RAISED SIGN PANEL: 60"x5.5"x1/2" thick primed and painted MDO overlay sign with matte white high performance computer cut vinyl graphics. V.‘ @ k § V, / § ��I • ro Z CO z 0 k cm NJ • § :1VSOdO8d 10 #1 <k m :31A1bN 1)3fO!!d