Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-04-06 HPC Packetr Heritage Preservation Commission Notice of Meeting Monday, April 6, 2009 The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, April 6, 2009, in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF March 2, 2009 MINUTES 3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.01 Case No. DEM/09-15. A demolition request for a 2-story duplex located at 107 3rd St No in the PA, Public Administration District. Trinity Lutheran Church, Bob Eiselt, applicant. 5. DESIGN REVIEWS 5.01 Case No. DR/09-12. Design review for sign, North Main Studio, located at 402 Main St North in the CBD, Central Business District. Carl Erickson, applicant. 5.02 Case No. DR/09-13. Design review for an addition to an existing building (The Lowell Inn) located at 102 North Second Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Richard Anderson, applicant. 5.03 Case No. DR/09-14. Design review for signage, Haskell's, located at 2225 Curve Crest Blvd, in the BP-O, Business Park Office District. Lawrence Signs, Shari King, applicant. 5.04 Case No. DR/09/16. Design review of exterior renovation and signage located at 201 South Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District. CNH Architects, applicant. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. OTHER BUSINESS 7.01 Review and select annual preservation awards 8. ADJOURN City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission March 2, 2009 Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Gayle Hudak, Jerry Krakowski, Roger Tomten and Council Representative Micky Cook Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge Absent: Phil Eastwood, Jeff Johnson and Scott Zahren Chair Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Mr. Tomten, seconded by Mr. Lieberman, moved approval of the minutes of Feb. 2, 2009, as presented. Motion passed unanimously. OPEN FORUM Mr. Lieberman invited comments from the audience. No comments were received. PUBLIC HEARINGS DESIGN REVIEWS Case No. DR/09-07 Design Review for two wall mounted signs located at 2050 Market Drive in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Sign Art, Finn Jacobsen, applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Tomten asked about the apparent discrepancy in the staff report regarding whether the proposed sign meets requirements. Mr. Pogge explained that the proposed signage meets the requirements of the sign plan for the Marketplace Center. However, the sign plan does not address size; the City's zoning code limits the allowable square footage. Mr. Pogge stated the applicant has agreed to reduce the size to meet code requirements, and that is part of the conditions of approval. Ms. Hudak expressed a concern about the proposed placement of the signage as it appears to be out of alignment with the adjacent signage; Mr. Pogge stated that concern is addressed in condition No. 2. Mr. Tomten moved approval as conditioned, changing condition No. 2 to indicate that the new signage should be placed adjacent to the neighboring business's signage, "tobacco" sign. Ms. Hudak seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-08 Design Review for construction of a wood deck, 13'6" x 12', located at 150 Third St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Patrick LaCasse, representing Mike Rice and Diane Hark, applicants. The applicants were present. Mr. LaCasse showed photographs showing materials of adjacent buildings; he stated the proposed use of stone veneer for the deck columns is in keeping with stone used in buildings throughout town, but said they would be open to use of another material. Mr. Rice said he thought the deck would be a good addition to the building. Ms. Hark stated they plan to have an iron railing consistent with what is currently on the building; she pointed out the building is 65' from the street, and the new deck will not be that noticeable. Mr. Tomten suggested looking into matching the existing brick on the building in order to provide continuity to the building. Mr. Lieberman agreed with the concern about the introduction of a 1 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission March 2, 2009 third materials element. Mr. Tomten said he thought the proposed deck was a good use, but said he was concerned about going to the stone face. Mr. Tomten moved approval as conditioned, with the additional condition that the applicant pursue use of brick to match the existing building as closely as possible and provide a sample of the proposed brick to staff. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-09 Design review for a wall sign (Dairy Queen) at 132 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Paul Williquett, representing Greg Gartner, applicant. Present were Paul Williquett and architect Mark Balay. Mr. Balay briefly reviewed plans for the wall sign to be centered on the Main Street elevation. Mr. Balay noted the colors and symbols are Dairy Queen corporate requirements. Mr. Lieberman expressed his sentiment that in this economy, the City/Commission needs to recognize corporate logos as reality and make them work in the best way possible, saying that he would rather see the use of a rather subdued corporate logo than a boarded up storefront. Mr. Tomten asked about signage for upstairs tenants. Mr. Balay noted the tenant entrance is on Chestnut Street and they will come back with plans for that signage. Mr. Balay noted that the signage requested at this time must be up and on the building in order for the Dairy Queen to open, but he suggested that there may be some signage changes in the future. Mr. Tomten moved approval as submitted and conditioned. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. DR/09-10 Design Review for a storefront sign at 214 Main St. S. in the CBD, Central Business District. Jill Martin of St. Croix Signs, applicant. A representative of St. Croix Signs was present. Mr. Tomten asked if the proposal is to use an existing bracket. The sign representative stated the bracket is being reused, brought from the business's previous location in Afton; he said the bracket will be mounted into an existing wood post, and there will be no lighting. Ms. Hudak moved approval as conditioned. Mr. Krakowski seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously. Case No. 09-11 Design Review for signage at 14396 90th St. N. in the Business Park Commercial District. Signminds, Inc., applicant. The applicant was not present. Mr. Lieberman expressed his displeasure with applicants who do not show up for meetings. Mr. Pogge indicated he had talked with both applicants not in attendance at this meeting. It was noted in the staff review in the agenda packet that the proposed sign meets the requirement of code and the approved variances. Mr. Tomten, seconded by Ms. Hudak, moved approval as submitted and conditioned. Motion passed unanimously. 2 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission March 2, 2009 NEW BUSINESS OTHER BUSINESS Discussion establishing a subcommittee to review the City's demolition ordinance and rules on residential building alterations — Mr. Pogge referred to the "explosion" of demolition requests the HPC has been dealing with and the recent occurrence of three unauthorized demolitions. He spoke to the City's aging housing stock and suggested the formation of a subcommittee to look at the demolition ordinance and related issues. He suggested membership of the subcommittee might include several HPC members, a Council member, architect, homeowner and historian Don Empson. Mr. Lieberman agreed that this discussion and review needs to take place, pointing out that the HPC's authority regarding denial of demolition permits has never been clear. Mr. Lieberman spoke of the competing interests involved in such cases and suggested hosting an open forum before forming any committee to see what the community thinks about the issue and to find out who might be interested in serving on a committee. Mr. Tomten spoke of injecting an educational element into the process. Ms. Hudak expressed her concern that nothing is being done to preserve some of the City's most beautiful buildings or educate people on how to preserve/restore buildings. Ms. Cook spoke of the issue of demolition by neglect and noted the City has nothing in place to address that problem; she agreed that the process/discussion of the issue needs to be as open as possible and should involve education to promote the buy -in of the community. Adam Johnston, 1104 Third St. S., said he has been seeing this (demolition by neglect) happen to homes, not just outbuildings. The representative from St. Croix Signs who was present for the earlier Design Review spoke in favor of being progressive in saving the City's historic structures. University of Minnesota students in attendance were invited to comment and later welcomed to participate in the process. Mr. Pogge said he would come back to the Commission with a proposed work plan and said he planned to discuss this issue with each Commission member on an individual basis at the member's convenience. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Lieberman, second by Ms. Hudak. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary 3 e: ii E ACE OE i'A N id [ 4 p TA Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-15 APPLICANT: Trinity Lutheran Church REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a residential duplex LOCATION: 107 Third St N HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 6, 2009 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner V4 ccr BACKGROUND Trinity Lutheran Church, property owner of 107 Third St N, is requesting a demolition permit for the existing residential duplex. The property is in the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District. The current structure was built in the early 1870's. Their intent would be to construct an 8,000 square foot building to house a new retail post office with additional office space. DISCUSSION Since the structure is over 50 years old, it is considered to have potential historic significance per City ordinances. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. This site is in the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District and arty new structure is subject to design criteria and review by the HPC. Evaluation Of Request Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review. Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... The structure was built in early 1870's making it more than 50 years old which makes it potentially historically significant and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission before it can be demolished. 107 Third St N Demolition Permit Page 2 Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items that must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; This information is included in the attached application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; This information is included in the attached application. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The entire structure is proposed to be demolished. The applicant has indicated that it is their intent to salvage any building material that has historic or other value. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant stated it is not economically feasible to restore the structure. The applicant has included information related to the cost to renovate the home from River Valley Restoration. River Valley Restoration estimates that it would cost in the range of $232,500 to restore the structure. (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant stated in their application that they plan to build an 8,000 square foot building to house a new retail post office with additional rental office space. Preliminary elevations of the new building are included in the packet. Final plans will be reviewed by the Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Administrative Office (A/O). The 2030 DRAFT comprehensive plan provides for a land use designation of Downtown Mixed Use. The property is currently zoned PA, Public Administrative. The proposed uses will meet the intent of the current and proposed land use designation and the current zoning requirements. The site is in the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District and is thus subject to design review criteria. 107 Third St N Demolition Permit Page 3 (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant refers to restoration as an alternative to demolition. However, the $232,500 estimate to restore is not considered cost effective by the applicant. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The structure was listed for sale in the Stillwater Gazette on March 17, 2009. A copy of the ad has been included for the Commission's reference. The applicant has included a report from Mr. Donald Empson. A copy has been included in the packet. Mr. Empson noted that the building would not be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. If the request is found acceptable to the HPC than the demolition permit should be approved. 2. Deny the requests. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. 3. Continue the public hearing until the June Commission meeting. attachment: Application Supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Request Permit Demolition Permit No. Fee $100* Address of Project: 107 Third Street North Parcel No.: R28. 030. 20. 42. OC Lot 15 Block 19 Subdivision Original City Applicant: Trinity Lutheral'n Church Address: 115 Fourth Street North Telephone No.: (651) 439-7400 Owner if different than Applicant: Same Address: Telephone No. Type of Structure: Wood frame, 2-story Duplex Age of Structure:120 yr'sCondition of Structure: Poor Intended Use of Site after Demolitiof: See City of Stillwater Site for new Post Office -- Comp. plan 74„fj /7 f Signature of Applicant Par%o/, /'t 01,0) j S' ror Date Signature of Owner Date *After review and approval of the demolition permit request with the Heritage Preservation Commission, a building permit must be obtained with tho City of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: ❑ Approved City Planner/Community Development Director ❑ Denied Date • March 17, 2009 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 trinity Love. Transform. Serve. Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: Accompanying this letter is our application for a Demolition Permit for a structure located at 107 Third Street North, Stillwater. The building was built as a private residence in the early 1870's. See historian's report attached, from Don Empson. The building in question, a wood -framed, 2-story duplex, was first owned by the Julius Brunswick Family, and was converted to a duplex around 1920. A more detailed history is contained in Mr. Empson's report. See attached. In response to the code requirements per section 34-5.1 from the City of Stillwater Building Demolition Code, we offer the following: a. See attached maps — labeled item a. b. Legal description: The West Ninety (90) feet of Lot Fifteen (15) , Block Nineteen (19), Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, subject to a perpetual easement over and across the North Five (5) feet of the West Ninety (90) feet of Lot Fifteen (15) , Block Nineteen (19), as contained in the Warranty Deed recorded in Book 160 of Deeds, page 228, to be used as a driveway for ingress and egress from the South Forty-five (45) feet of the West Ninety (90) feet of Lot Sixteen (16), Block Nineteen (19), Original town (now City) of Stillwater. According to the Survey and plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of Washington County, Minnesota. Owner of Record: Trinity Lutheran Church, 115 4th St. North, Stillwater, MN 55082 c. See photos attached — labeled item c. d. The entire wood -framed 2 story duplex will be demolished. We will however, attempt to salvage/recycle any building materials that have historic or other value, i.e. windows/glass, doors, hardware, etc. e. It is not economically feasible to restore the structure — see attached restoration bid from River Valley Restoration/Rolf Dittman for $232,500. Given the rent currently paid, the project would not cash flow based on principal and interest alone, before taxes, maintenance, etc. f. The re -use plan is to build an 8,000 square foot building to house a new retail post office for downtown Stillwater, plus additional office spaces. See architects drawings of proposed new building attached — designed to complement existing neighborhood with characteristics of City Hall, the Water Department Building, the new City Parking Ramp and Trinity Lutheran Church. Construction scheduled for Summer 2009, in conjunction with City Parking Ramp project. g. The property in question is guided for downtown mixed use per City Council -approved draft Comprehensive Plan, specifically a site for the new retail post office building. Trinity Lutheran Church +- 115 N. Fourth Street 4 Stillwater, MN 55082 -+- 651.439.7400 - trinitylc.org r h. Restoration of present building — not feasible — see item e. Also not consistent with City Comprehensive Plan. i. See attached copy of ad ran in Stillwater Gazette March 17, 2009 — labeled - item i. j. See attached report from historian Don Empson. Sincerely, Trinity Lutheran Church 4in I `P S 4✓v -4 5 r Item a. Item C • • Item C • • • Item C • • • Item C • • • Item e. • Trinity Lutheran Church 115 N. 4th St., Stillwater, MN. 55082 date River Valley Restoration - Rolf Dittmann MN. License # 20225283 12823 St. Croix Trail North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 phone: 651-430-1560, cell: 651-343-2255 Project Overview: Restore duplex at 3rd St. North & Myrtle Street, Stillwater Project steps: * Demolish interior plaster / drywall * Excavate perimeter of foundation * Disconnect utilities * Lift building off existing foundation * Construct footings and foundation * Reset building * Install new sills, beams, and posts per engineering a'Pourbasement slab Perform other structural repairs * Construct new interior stair to code * Replace roof * New HVAC, wiring, plumbing * Replace 19 windows with new vinyl insert windows * Replace 3 exterior doors and 3 storm doors * replace or restore interior doors * Insulate: walls to R19, attic to R38 * New drywall * New or restored trim * New cabinets and counters * New appliances * New bath fixtures * New maintenance -free decking including railing • page 1 Item e. Trinity Lutheran Church 115 N. 4th St., Stillwater, MN. 55082 River Valley Restoration - Rolf Dlittmann MN. License # 20225283 12823 St. Croix Trail North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 phone: 651-430-1560, cell: 651-343-2255 Page 2 We agree to furnish all labor and materials to complete the above project in a workmanlike manner for the sum of two hundred thirty-two thousand, five hundred dollars ($232,500.00). Terms are as follows: Payment Terms: 25 % due upon acceptance 25 % due upon 50 % completion 25 % due upon 75 % completion Balance due upon completion and issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Contract excludes the following Permits & disposal III echanics' Lien Notice: Any person or company supplying labor or materials for this improvement to your property may file a lien against your property if that person or company is not paid for their contributions. Under Minnesota Law you have the right to pay persons who supplied labor or materials for this improvement directly and deduct this amount from our contract price, or withhold the amounts due them from us until 120 days after completion of the improvement unless we give you a lien waiver signed by those persons who supplied any labor or materials for this improvement and who supplied any labor or materials for this improvement and who gave you timely notice. By executing this proposal, I/we are admitting service of and receipt of this Mechanics' Lien Notice. (initials) Acceptance of Proposal The above prices, specifications, conditions, and mechanics' lien notice are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. If payment is not made as agreed, you shall be entitled to all costs of collection you incur, including reasonable attomey's fees. Date of Acceptance: Signature: Signature: River Valley Restoration- Specializing in Buildings of Character in the St. Croix Valley page 2 Item f. • • • New 3rd Street Building with space for USPS • View of new 3rd St building from the Northwest /• • - 17- Jr „.„ _ • .14 - -1- 4 • • • • Myrtle Street view of new 3rd St building with space for USPS ti .. i ,-:, , 47---_ -- // ---z..- -.:----------74--"//// ,,, //,'-(.- ( ,.. __ __ it I • - Item f. • • Footprint of proposed office building • Light grey lines are existing improvements. Dark grey lines are proposed improvements. 29 total free parking spaces: 2 of total are handicapped; 2 could be removed should a delivery dock be required. s Blue outline = free parking Parking ramp gate • 1 Item i. 2660 Window Cleaning 651-646-4000 Windows, Chandelier & Gutter Cleaning 3000 Merchandise 3160 Furnishings 5000 Rentals 5200 Townhouse For Rent 6400 Apartments & Condos For Rent 3BR, 2BA Foreclosure! Only $11,900! Available 2001 Townhome, 2BR, .3BA Now. For listings call + loft, 1680SF dbl gar, fr 1-800-619-3853 Ext.1924 plc, laun, $1250 + utils. Av: now. 651-335-4520 5300 Duplexes/Dbl Bungalows For Rent STWR- Lwr 4 rm apt, avi 4/1, 651-430-3569 5400 Houses For Rent '60's STWR RAMBLER 3BR, 2BA, 2 car, $1300+utils , 651-336-5444 3BR 2BA Foreclosure!. Beautiful Solid Wood Sec- retary Desk, 612-812-3100 Now. For listing§ call 1- 800-619.3853 Ext. 1924 OPEN HOUSE Sunday March 22nd` 12-3pni ' 650 N. Main St. Unit 402. Stillwater $349,000 River views from this 1BR/1BA 2 story Tower Condo await you. Come see for yourself! Gina 612-282-9537, Agent Tuesday, March 17, 2009 651-796-1103 • WWW.STILLWATERGAZETTE.COM CLASSIFIED ADS basis' .eagiesi�ing 2-746-3046' ,LASSIFIEDS produces quick, economical RESULTS! To place an ad, call (651)796-1103 Items. .4fr s e d The Sl COTTAGES OF STILLWATER 1BR-$655, 2BR-$755 gar avl Priv Entry, Washer/Dryer hook up. No dogs. 651-439-9663 Luxury DT STWR condos for lease w/pool, fitness center, undergrnd park- ing, Starting at $1100 incl Direct TV. 763-232-6267 STWR: 2BR $575, Stwr .1BR $540 Heated N/P Av14/1 651- 436-7966 7000 Real Estate 7500 Duplexes/Dbl Bungalows For Sale For Sale: 107 N Third St in Stillwater, 1870s era struc- ture, known as the Brunswick property, - cur- rently a residential du- plex. Buyer would be re- sponsible for removal of the structure and related permits, fees and costs. Price negotiable. Contact Bob at 651-439-7400. 8400 Homes for Sale 3BR, 2BA Foreclosure! Only $11,900! MUST SEE! For listings call 1-800-619- 3853 Ext. 1924 9200 Help Wanted/ 9500 Automotive 9632 Honda $500 Police Impounds! Hondas, Chevys, Jeeps, & More. For listings call 1-800-619-3842 Ext. 4336. 9810 Junkers & Repairable Wanted $$WANTED$$ JUNK CARS towing available Viking Auto Salvage 651-460-6166 LOgr S'OMET///NO, FOND S'OmETI//NG.' LOST & FOUND ADS RUN 5 DAYS FOR \ /do FRE: s> a1 i '4 IN THE 0711W4TER BAZEITE CCAS'S'/REDel 651.796.1103 Cal! to schedule your Lost or Found ad. &AKEEtN www.furydodge 651-111-131 '06 Audi A3 2 52K miles, Had Leather, 17 Panoramic Moonroof, Stock '17,99 '01 Jeep Wrangler Um Rubicon, 17K miles, MyGig Rod Tnkok Front & Rear Axles Sib 24,9 101 Jeep G. C er Lmt CRD, 164 miles! 3.01 V6 Di leather, Nay, Bock -up Camera, SO 27,99 '08 Smart Forl Passion Coupe, 9K miles, Fu Frugal on Fuel! Stock #2' '14,99 '08 Dodge G. (arm 510 miles! Dual DVD's, My( Back-up Camera, Stock l $2199 '08 gvys1er Town & tot 23K mils, DVD, MyGig I Back-up Camera, Stock A '14 99 '08 Chrysler 300 T 15K miles, Hid Leather, 3.51 ESP, Traction Control, Stock #16,99 '09 Dodge Durango Lmtd 82 miles, Heim Ny 1206 NORTH SECOND STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 (651) 351-0172 FAX: (65 1 ) 430-2051 EMPSON@USFAMILY.NET Donald Lmpson Report on the History of 107 Third Street North, Stillwater (The West 90 feet of Lot 15, Block 19, Original City) This piece of property was part of a larger parcel of land purchased by Julius Brunswick in October, 1870. (Book T Deeds, page 340.) At the time of this purchase, there were no buildings on the lot. Julius was born in Switzerland in 1826, came to Stillwater in 1848 where, it is written, he "applied himself closely to business and was successful." He died in 1874, leaving a widow, seven children, and considerable property. The building at 107 N. Third was built as a private residence in the early 1870s. It remained in the Brunswick family as income rental property until 1951 when it was sold to local businessman, Lyman Sutton. (Book 175 Deeds, page 380.) At that time, this building and its lot were separated from the larger parcel of land. Apparently the residence was converted to a duplex around 1920. It does not appear that any of the Brunswick family lived in this house, preferring instead to remain at their family home at 114 E. Chestnut. Between 1951 and 2001, the property passed through twelve subsequent owners, including a canceled Contract for Deed and a mortgage foreclosure. Trinity Church purchased the house and property in 2003 for $265,000. This building would not be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under any criteria. Donald Empson November, 2008 1206 NORTH SECOND STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 (651) 351-0172 Fax: (651) 430-2051 EMPSON@USFAMILY.NET Donald Empson Attachments to History of 107 Third Street North 1.) 1870 Bird's Eye View Map 2. 1874(?) Runk Photo of Third & Myrtle Streets 3. 1879 Bird's Eye View Map 4.) 1884 Sanborn Insurance Map 5.) 1888 Sanborn Insurance Map 6.) 1891 Sanborn Insurance Map 7.) 1898 Sanborn Insurance Map 8.) 1904 Sanborn Insurance Map 9.) 1910 Sanborn Insurance Map 10.) 1915(?) Photograph of Third Street 11.) 1924 Sanborn Insurance Map ?r16 .502-11) \116.4.) V\A A- 7 o 11\1 • • \ '?q 13\CZ-OS ; ip j._-No; of...weind !M *ROSE NAME ASSESSED SUBDIVISIONS Sec, Town !Rng. Lot Block I Acres g .Value c. 1 C -, // 8 Y.Grtl.2s t y L.�,; 4 [^C' 0 7 " 6 (1-'4 • /1%.0 4 ;• 4co- at c7.-4ek 41, 10 a d p / j �B, 12 14 15 1 t; 17 odil* 4-d at,;; U//, 21) / ,/;.d ; te1'ci , % ./!'.✓ . //; // `� (/ �� s /7.4 / x1. s j .�� JS`Y1713r 7. ., << rye ./7fJ i. I? /f ✓ / v—U-e /! /7 V p2ltOl /71vt r kk !I" s,. r* • 4,1%PeArr ote°E.,(7.-///7•PS'Eet, at/ cw. /4(4, EirAdia•VW-).3,/j,e'$. 90r1 ',44-/ A.047 4.4"fr+54Y6+ 1F:1 12E11111111 ••Szter)r.',* (t2xlrrrQcvJ j ,' EN1570 CNuRc y ?, x c 770 !Yin ci aws r xi 2.01, • I' ! /5-0'24 "Mos, "PPRZ4 4M/RSionCE7WEAW'Wni.4 1 . / — 111 Shed r ' II ---)11 4 t. x , • ... 9 2r87— —"7 k b , '6'!TA i.:;‘,` II' • loacts.is ! ' i 4.9 7/,',4** tlif aPJ/74°1 •-.11 -• 11 • I 04 0- : ' il ' ' ! " Hat' 1 , II li :4) : - 1• O. f'/71717-711 ' 1r III 1.1 P , . • . ' . pi p • ', okll I 1,!•ik . ''''' . - .... • , isr49.,' . (1.11 :.:: .i ' I 1 I r • ' :::. 1,, ! :I ' ' ' ; . , r•-1 i ,-; ' ' ' NII I t t if • I 11't (47 Is ---- �- aaduor =_tea ===ifljr o� N did;(/ O 9// 17// Z// O// a, -i It //o. 4z - • '''.;?.;;r4;,;zrs,.. *T4 ilS4' &Oh' 41° 454:e0P#L. CAW # I rzt741-P4vi: frZ • $ T14 worER e'varlihsfpnis Swam 11 • it 0 fh• 0 ,t II II it t.i.1 11 !! 011 #Zqr, ri/RAS.- I t 14:57/ : G)Ar f so,Oiirf • 1' 1; 2/ h1I714-AV COOPei4777VP 7 2Z) Pore), .4 EAR fr WRY - L • i4tgliivAgsts • rr 4i t V4S/ A 147 *FE:r fe:/??*1, tr.s..4- 5; II - 1.- ;I ,; . • .311 = ;P:I/A1 IA!$, .877f7.70N; • • ,1- LIN I i• 1 I Zit '••• A net T/Lif9'TER 13,Mi'KET CRoresetRY & &arm, 44--orsnme• POWER a I APIT 7 • IRO ; ,• I 7-71 I le,vbvs II I . . Nat • • 4 0 i i ii I I it til4k1. 1 ° • Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-12 APPLICANT: Carl Erickson REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage for North Main Studio LOCATION: 402 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: April 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner r DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a sign at 402 Main St N for North Main Studio. This site is within the Isaac Staples Building. The sign is proposed to contain the business name "North Main Studio" in blue with their logo and words "LLC" in maroon all on a white background. The sign is 80" wide by 34" tall for a total of 18.8 square feet in area. The sign will be non -illuminated. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states building signs in the CBD '...may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space is 20 feet long facing Main St N. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 18.8 square feet which is smaller than allowed under the zoning ordinance. 402 Main St S Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the Downtown Stillwater Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing of the proposed sign Photo of existing building • Application for Sian Permit Fee: $50.00 Community Development Department 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8820 Location of Sign Address 4Q2M .jN4• - City Stillwater State MN Zip 55082 Applicant Name T om.-4M(411,s'TLAA lc::)/CARt_ 2.c_K-saw Phone # E i. t •51 • 1 5 Address At72 Mp t 4 t Ai - City s`ct u�.1A\T Z St to a. N Zip S 2- Owner (if different from Applicant) Name Phone* Address City State Zip Contractor's Name Name GAi:2L. F' 1CJC�j1•J City \U,.1 Phone* en451 . Sly At.--‘ t • 13-79 Address oz �l1A1 tit S'C �1 Zip :=f8"Z. e following documents (Required to be submitted with application) ❑ Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used. If the sign is to be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign. Additionally, if the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building. ❑ Design Review application (if required). All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West Stillwater Business Park require design review by HPC Sign Details Sign Size: Dimensions: ^y — . v = Square Feet Sign Height: (If freestanding) � tX I�j Setbacks: From Property Line From Bldg r From Driveway/Parking Lot Color! J� M ti )-4: -TRAIIVVDIOSK- If Yes, Type: MAk 2 f Lk6 1 1 Illumination: ❑ Yes )&No on I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is issu lated to this r- • est. 1 ure Review (For once use onM Date •t ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Permlt # Date By Conditions for approval: * Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractors license application form is available at Stillwater City Hall. Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service. CAPianninn\Fnnn•Vinnlinefinn in. Cron D..mN dnn I Indn1.A• Rn..f.,nh.. 99 "AAA Mug & LLC Cut from 3/4" sintra, painted Letters Cut from 3/4" Sintra, painted All raised off of backing board 1/2" Backer, white, painted MDO Signboard Fastened to wall through backer with stainless steel screws covered with white vinyl e THE P r PLAT:E OF AllAI iESOLA DATE: March 31, 2009 APPLICANT: Richard Anderson REQUEST: Design Review for Lowell Inn Annex LOCATION: 202 North 2"d Street HPC REVIEW DATE: April 6, 2009 PREPARED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director' 7 CASE NO.: DR/09-13 BACKGROUND The development agreement for the municipal parking ramp included provisions for construction of a banquet facility between the Lowell Inn and the parking ramp. Public discussions of the parking ramp also included references to a potential 2"d and 3rd story above the banquet facility. An application has now been submitted for design review by the Heritage Preservation Commission for that addition, referred to as the Lowell Inn Annex. The Lowell Inn Annex is proposed for construction in two phases. The first phase would be the ground level banquet center; a 3,975 square foot banquet facility for up to 150 guests. The guests of the banquet center would be served by the Lowell Inn kitchen and staff, though there would be access to the Inn by banquet facility guests. There would, however, be guest access to the elevator and stairwell tower of the adjoining municipal parking ramp. The second phase of the annex would be two stories of 1,780 square feet each. These two stories would include a total of 12 hotel rooms. SPECIFIC REQUEST In order to develop the three story annex as proposed, Dick Anderson has made application for design review approval for the exterior of both phases of the annex project. In addition to design review approval by the Heritage Preservation Commission, Mr. Anderson will also need to make application for Planning Commission approval of: 1. A Special Use Permit for the banquet facility and hotel expansion; and 2. A variance from parking requirements; and Lowell Inn Annex March 31, 2009 Page 2 of 4 3. A 2.5 foot variance from the minimum height requirement for infill buildings in the historic area of the downtown height district. Deeds for the surface parking lots owned by the Lowell Inn were transferred to the City in order to build the parking ramp. It was recognized with the transfer of land to the City that a parking variance would be needed for the Lowell Inn addition. However, given the availability of parking in the ramp, there would be sufficient parking for the Inn, surrounding land uses, and downtown retail customers as well. Incidentally, use of the parking ramp by Lowell Inn guests will be at the same fee rates as other users of the ramp. The height variance request is interesting. For infill projects downtown, the height of the infill building can be a maximum of 10% more than the average height of the buildings on either side of it. But, it must be a minimum of no less than 10% of that average. The ramp's tower height is 52 feet, and the Lowell Inn is 47 feet tall. The average height is therefore 49.5 feet. So, the maximum height of the Lowell Inn Annex could be 54.5 feet, but the minimum height has to be 44.5 feet. The proposed annex height is 42 feet. So a 2.5 foot variance is needed from the minimum height standard. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The building is located in the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National Registry of Historic Districts. The building itself is a contributing building to the Historic District. Consequently, the design standards found in the Design Manual, Commercial Historic District apply to the project. The applicable pages of the Design Manual are attached. City Staff offers the following comments: The annex designer's goal is to create three stories of infill with a facade that complements the architectural fabric of the west side of 2' Street without copying the historic facade of the Lowell Inn or the new facade of the parking ramp. This goal is consistent with the downtown design manual, which states on Page 5: "The basic principle for new construction in historic Downtown Stillwater is to maintain the scale and character of present buildings. Generally new structures should provide height, massing, setback, materials and rhythm compatibility [with] surrounding buildings." 1. Massing, height & rhythm — The proportions and massing of the proposed infill building fit fairly well between the parking ramp and the Lowell Inn. As seen in the colored rendering submitted by DBA Architects, the annex is neither as tall as the ridgeline of the Lowell Inn nor as tall as the stair tower of the ramp. But, the parapet height of the annex is about equal to the front facade height of the ramp's entrance section. Consequently, the height rhythm of the ramp is picked up in the annex and carried through to the Lowell Inn. The only awkwardness is that the south wall of the annex's third story is slightly exposed because it is above the eave line of the Inn's gabled roof. This can be seen in the attached Lowell Inn Annex March 31, 2009 Page 3 of 4 colored graphic that represents the whole block of 2"d Street between Myrtle and Mulberry.' 2. Setback — The facade of the annex is proposed to match the setback of the existing kitchen addition, which is 15 feet. The columns of the Inn's front porch have a 10 foot setback and the parking ramp has a 20 foot setback. So, the proposed annex is an average of the two. The attached site plan shows this. 3. Materials, detailing and color • Arched windows found in the Lowell Inn's ground floor were carried into the ramp facade and are also proposed for the Annex. • Brick masonry is the predominant material proposed for the Annex, which is a material found in the Lowell Inn facade. • CMU soldier course found in the ramp is replicated in the Annex. • The recessed balconies and entrance to the Annex create a pleasant texture and interesting shadow lines. Rooftop equipment and penetration details have not been submitted. Since the rooftops of both the banquet center and the hotel room stories will be visible at least partially from above the 3rd Street bluffline, this information will need to be submitted before a building permit can be issued. Rooftop mechanical units should be avoided. Exterior lighting details will need to be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. There will be no exterior trash receptacles. ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives they could consider: A. Approve. If the proposed design review plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they could be approved. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Approve in part. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requested could be tabled until your May 4, 2009 meeting so that additional information could be submitted. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is May 17, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the design permit, with the following conditions: ' Note: the referenced graphic shows a much earlier version of the ramp than is being constructed. However, it does show relative scale, massing and rhythm properly. The construction drawings showing the ramp elevation that will be built are attached for reference. Lowell Inn Annex March 31, 2009 Page 4 of 4 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan set dated 3/20/09, which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. The design permit shall not become valid unless a height variance is approved by the Planning Commission. 3. No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the project site. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director. The lighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 7 All gutters, downspouts, fleshings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 9. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 2"d Street. 10. No trash enclosures are planned to be located outside. Therefore, no trash enclosures or trash bins will be allowed without prior approval of the HPC. 11. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. attachments: Site plan Applicant's materials Colored rendering of 2'6 Street Ramp elevations Excerpts from Downtown Design Manual f/" NSA L Nds��// Li- 6z0��w\� 6 L0L 90 9N1011119 ONLLSIX3 X0' L 0 dQN . Z L 83M3S VINOJS ONI SIX3 30VId38 ONV 3A01N38--- ONIO11l8 ONILSIX3 NOLL03N LL 91.06Z9£ 'ON '000 0330 r r i3 lino 83d 133 JVd 113M01 9"01.L=A313 80013 L'L£L®A313 210013 6'£ZL=A313 210011 1 F- \ lull 09 \ c. `moo U S2131-110 n� ' 3N00 38 0b 1 , 213M3S 321111f1d L'bOL ANI 9'60L 1118 3d10 'X3 213A0 HW VI - O11f18 183ANI ONY NOLLY001 lOVX3 210J 1VOINVH0311/M`� 31VNIOMO, 83SI8 OIJS3W00 .Z/L—L 30 \a7.iA \ S'L0L ANI 'NVS 6BL, •Inn min 11VM ONINM138 )13018 XO' L 0 cr. a3Na l ii37 Vd 1V 3. NOth .Z/� J �5• g5 DF architects 7300 HUDSON BLVD. NO., SUITE 230 PHONE: 651-714-8115 FAX: 651-735-1228 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128-7143 www.dbaarchitects.com To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: DBA Architects Date: 3/19/2009 Re: Lowell Inn Annex The Lowell Inn Annex is a 3-story building located between the historic Lowell Inn and the city parking ramp currently under construction. The main floor of the building has an area of 3,975 sq. ft., consisting of the main entrance vestibule, a lobby area, restrooms and a banquet hall with seating for 150 persons. The main level will be accessed from the street, and the city parking ramp, and the banquet hall will be served from the kitchen in the Lowell Inn. The banquet hall will have access to the outdoor patio area behind the Lowell Inn. The second and third floors have an area of 1,780 sq. ft. each, and will have guest rooms that will be accessed from the Lowell Inn and the city parking ramp. The guest rooms on the street or river side of the building will have open balconies. Parking will be in the city parking ramp. The building exterior facade will be a combination of brick masonry and architectural precast concrete on the street side, and EFIS on the west side. The exposed area on the north end of the building on the street side will be brick masonry. The exposed areas on the south end of the building will be brick masonry on the street side, and EFIS on the west side. In the design, it was important NOT TO try and duplicate the architecture of the Lowell Inn or the parking garage, but to design a building that is complementary to both, and to respect the historic nature of the architecture of the City of Stillwater. This has been accomplished by the use exterior material and details that complement the exterior architecture of the Lowell Inn, the parking structure, and the City of Stillwater. By setting the building forward, it is made flush with the small part of the Lowell Inn building that protrudes 5 feet in front of the Inn and incorporates that area of the existing facade into the facade of the new building, and at the same time makes it possible to provide balconies for the guest rooms on the east side of the building. The guest room balconies provide relief to the building exterior, eliminates a large flat wall, and allows guests the opportunity to enjoy the view and a breath of fresh air. In addition a long flat facade along the street is avoided when the addition is set out from the front wall of the Inn and the garage. DBA Architects LOWELL STILLWATER, INN ANNEX MN 7300 HUDSON BLVD. N. , SUITE 230 OAKDALE, MN 55128 architects PH(651)714-8115 FAX (651)735-1228 arc www.dbaarchitects.com ELEVATIONS 03-20-09 BANQUET HALL I SCALE: I/4" = I'-0" 9 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I/8" = I'-0 o II X 11 FIST PLOOIR FLAN 0' 2' 4' LOWELL INN ANNEX STILLWATER, 1\i li 7300 HUDSON BLVD. N. , SUITE 230 OAKDALE, MN 55128 PH(651)714-8115 FAX (651)735-1228 www.dbaarchitects.com FIRST FLOOR PLAN, 03-20-09 Oro'-4" 5'-2" SECOND LOOK FLAN SCALE: I/4" = I'-0" g 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I/8" I'-m" e II X 11 LOWELL INN ANNEX STILLWATER, MN m 2=4 7300 HUDSON BLVD. N. , SUITE 230 OAKDALE, MN 55128 PH(651)714-8115 FAX (651)735-1228 www.dbaarchitects.com SECOND FLOOR PLAN 03-20-09 0 SCALE: 1/4" . 1'-0" 9 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET TI-IIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE. I/S" : 1'-0" o II X Il m' 2' 4' a' LOWELL INN ANNEX STILLWATER, MN 7300 HUDSON BLVD. N. , SUITE 230 OAKDALE, MN 55128 PH(651)714-8115 FAX (651)735-1228 www.dbaarchitects. com THIRD FLOOR PLAN 03-20--09 1 L IL PRE -FIN MTL COPING EFIS DECORATIVE MTL BALCONY AND RAILING EFIS PRE -FIN MTL COPING TWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" : I'-0" e 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0" g II X 11 0' 4' 8 16' PRE -FIN MTL COPING EFIS DECORATIVE MTL BALCONIES AND RAILINGS 4 Ell s1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIII1111111I1111IIIl 1 I11I11II L 1I nliiiuiiu 11l1Il!!lI!!I!lII!!1!iIPnwII!!!!!!IIII!4!IIglIIllllll11u11l11lllll1111111ll11lll11l111l111Ill11iIIlu �lllll!l'tllllI lIII1111IIIIIi- - EFIS AB A4 PRE -FIN MTL COPING EFIS EFTS TSOLIT1-1 ELEVATION SCALE. 3/32" : I'-0" a 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET SCALE 3/64" : I'-0" G II X IT 0' 4' 8' IS' PRE -FIN MTL COPING ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST MASONRY BRICK MASONRY ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST BREAK MTL TRIM DECORATIVE MTL RAILING EFIS FACE BRICK MASONRY ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST WALL FEATURE BRICK MASONRY ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST MASONRY Ci EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" a 24 X 36 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I/8" : 1'-0" o II X 11 0' 2' 4' 8' LOWELL INN ANNEX STILLWATER 7300 HUDSON BLVD. N. , SUITE 230 OAKDALE, MN 55128 PH(651)714-8115 FAX (651)735-1228 www.dbaarchitects.com ELEVATIONS 03-20--09 Facade Openings Background It is important to recognize the difference between upper story openings and storefront, or street level openings. There is a much greater transparent or glazed open area at storefront level, for pedestrians to have a better view of the merchandise displayed behind, there are wide windows and little or no spacing between openings. Upper story openings are predominantly narrow with a vertical orientation that accompanies double -hung windows. Guidelines • The size and proportion of windows and door openings of an infill building should be similar to those on the adjacent facades. • Avoid infill panels when providing new windows in existing masonry openings. • Storefront restoration should return the facade to its original character appropriate. • Avoid concealing the original facade. The majority of storefronts have very common elements that include (1) entries, (2) kick plates, (3) display windows, (4) transom windows and a horizontal area for a canopy or sign. Transom windows Display windows Entry Kick Plates DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 19 Facade Openings 1. TRANSOM WINDOWS Background Transom windows were smaller windows above the display windows that functioned as early energy savers. They allowed daylight to enter deep into the interior of the space. When operable, they allowed excessive heat to escape. Transoms also continued the transparent quality of the storefront up to the top "frame" of the front facade, and are therefore an important element in the proportion of the building front. Guidelines Often transom windows can still be found in downtown buildings underneath exterior cover-ups, and or above dropped ceilings. They should be retained whenever possible. If the ceiling inside the store has been lowered, the ceiling could slope up 2-3 feet back to meet the transom, or dark painted panels can be placed behind transom windows to help simulate transparency and depth. 2. DISPLAY WINDOWS Background The display window is the link between the pedestrian environment outside and the business inside. Guidelines • A minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the street level Main Street facade shall be transparent and thirty percent (30%) on side streets or rear facades. • For remodeling, the original size, division and shape of display windows within the overall storefront frame should be preserved. • For an infill building, window frames should be wood, or appropriately colored aluminum or vinyl clad. • Reflective glass is prohibited. • Mirrored or heavily tinted glass on the first floor or street level should not be used because it conveys a conflicting modern design feeling. It also creates a blank wall effect, which may be offensive to the pedestrian. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 20 Facade Openings 3. ENTRIES Background Commercial storefront entries were typically recessed from the front plane of the structure. This provided a sheltered transition area to the interior of the store, more area for display space, and helped to emphasize the location of the entrance. Guidelines • Recessed entries should be retained in existing buildings and required in new storefront construction. • Commercial entry doors use large, glass panels with vertical proportions to aid a sense of invitation and openness to the business. • Solid or residential -type doors with small areas of glass should be avoided. • Openings containing double entry doors should be retained. • Painted wood doors and wood framing are preferred. Aluminum doors and doorframes, aluminum windows and their accessories with a clear aluminum finish are not acceptable, although colored anodized aluminum is acceptable. 4. KICK PLATES Background The kick plate, or bulkhead, functions to protect the display window by raising the glass area to a safer and more easily viewed height. Historically, materials have included wood panels, stone, brick and ceramic tile. Guidelines • The original kick plate materials should always be retained, maintained, or uncovered when possible. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 21 Setback Background Nothing does more to negatively change the social space of a small downtown street than the front building setback The recent emphasis onthe automobile and parking lots in front of commercial structures can effectively destroy a pedestrian expirience. It is far better to build right up to the sidewalk and facilitate the chances for browsing, social interaction and people watching. On occasion creating public space with a larger building setback can be successful, if the emphasis remains on creating a space that complements and enhances the streetscape. Guidelines • Infill buildings shall be built to the Main Street front property line, flush to adjacent buildings. Exceptions may be granted if the setback is pedestrian oriented and contributes to the quality and character of Main Street. • Arcades adjacent to Main Street sidewalks are encouraged to increase the effective width of the narrow sidewalks and provide a sheltered pedestrian path along store display windows. • No side setbacks are allowed unless next to a public pedestrian way. AVOID SETBACK FROM ADJACENT BUILDINGS BUILD IN LINE WITH ADJACENT BUILDINGS DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 10 Proportion Backround On Main Street, new building with wide disproportionate dimensions can easily disrupt the existing pattern of narrow lots and reletively high and narrow individual facades. Also, wide, undifferentiated walls or windows can drastically impact the existing pattern of narrow, high facade openings such as windows and doorways. Guidelines • The proportion of infill buildings should be sympathetic to the proportion of their neighbors. • Break up building masses into units of scale that relate to adjacent structures. • Design facade details, window openings and entries to conform to approximately the same proportional patterns of adjacent structures. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 11 Height Background This is one of the important elements to consider when designing new structures or additions to existing structures. While varied heights can mix with each other in visually interesting ways, a building, which is significantly taller than adjacent development, will seriously disrupt the existing scale of the downtown area. Guidelines • The heights of new buildings shall conform to the average height of buildings on the block street face. • The height of new buildings shall be four (4) stories and fifty -feet (50') maximum or two (2) stories minimum, and within ten percent (10%) of existing adjacent buildings. • Proposals should strive to maintain compatibility with adjacent cornice lines, floor to floor heights where these are strongly expressed, sign bands, and any other elements which serve to unify the street elevation as a whole. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 12 Roofs Background One of the major differences between residential and commercial buildings is the roof pitch or roofline. Residemial structures usually have some form of sloping or pitched roof. whereas commercial structures are known for their reletivly flat roofs, often hidden by the extension of the from wall plane. If this vertical extension is low, it is known as a parapet, if the extension beyond the roof plane is great, sometimes doubling the height of the building, it is known as a false front. Guidelines • The predominant roof shape in the commercial core is flat (slightly sloped to drain), with articulated parapets. These parapets, often embellished with brick detailing, are often stepped or sloped to achieve a visually interesting yet harmonious sequence along the building facade. • Infill building roofs shall be flat or gently pitched and hidden behind parapet walls that articulate the rhythm of the building. • Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 16 Facade Openings Background It is important to recognize the difference between upper story openings and storefront, or street level openings. There is a much greater transparent or glazed open area at storefront level, for pedestrians to have a better view of the merchandise displayed behind, there are wide windows and little or no spacing between openings. Upper story openings are predominantly narrow with a vertical orientation that accompanies double -hung windows. Guidelines • The size and proportion of windows and door openings of an infill building should be similar to those on the adjacent facades. • Avoid infill panels when providing new windows in existing masonry openings. • Storefront restoration should return the facade to its original character appropriate. • Avoid concealing the original facade. The majority of storefronts have very common elements that include (1) entries, (2) kick plates, (3) display windows, (4) transom windows and a horizontal area for a canopy or sign. Transom windows Display windows Entry Kick Plates DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 19 Facade Openings 1. TRANSOM WINDOWS Background Transom windows were smaller windows above the display windows that functioned as early energy savers. They allowed daylight to enter deep into the interior of the space. When operable, they allowed excessive heat to escape. Transoms also continued the transparent quality of the storefront up to the top "frame" of the front facade, and are therefore an important element in the proportion of the building front. Guidelines Often transom windows can still be found in downtown buildings underneath exterior cover-ups, and or above dropped ceilings. They should be retained whenever possible. If the ceiling inside the store has been lowered, the ceiling could slope up 2-3 feet back to meet the transom, or dark painted panels can be placed behind transom windows to help simulate transparency and depth. 2. DISPLAY WINDOWS Background The display window is the link between the pedestrian environment outside and the business inside. Guidelines • A minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the street level Main Street facade shall be transparent and thirty percent (30%) on side streets or rear facades. • For remodeling, the original size, division and shape of display windows within the overall storefront frame should be preserved. • For an infill building, window frames should be wood, or appropriately colored aluminum or vinyl clad. • Reflective glass is prohibited. • Mirrored or heavily tinted glass on the first floor or street level should not be used because it conveys a conflicting modern design feeling. It also creates a blank wall effect, which may be offensive to the pedestrian. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 20 Facade Openings 3. ENTRIES Background Commercial storefront entries were typically recessed from the front plane of the structure. This provided a sheltered transition area to the interior of the store, more area for display space, and helped to emphasize the location of the entrance. Guidelines • Recessed entries should be retained in existing buildings and required in new storefront construction. • Commercial entry doors use large, glass panels with vertical proportions to aid a sense of invitation and openness to the business. • Solid or residential -type doors with small areas of glass should be avoided. • Openings containing double entry doors should be retained. • Painted wood doors and wood framing are preferred. Aluminum doors and doorframes, aluminum windows and their accessories with a clear aluminum finish are not acceptable, although colored anodized aluminum is acceptable. 4. KICK PLATES Background The kick plate, or bulkhead, functions to protect the display window by raising the glass area to a safer and more easily viewed height. Historically, materials have included wood panels, stone, brick and ceramic tile. Guidelines • The original kick plate materials should always be retained, maintained, or uncovered when possible. DESIGN MANUAL, COMMERCIAL HISTORIC DISTRICT, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 21 lJ tl Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: April 1, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-14 APPLICANT: Lawrence Sign, Shari King REQUEST: Design Review of proposed signage change for Haskell's Wine LOCATION: 2225 Curve Crest Blvd COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: BPO - Business Park Office ZONING: BP-0 Business Park Office HPC DATE: April 6, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 1/14 DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to replace the existing Sutler's Wine and Spirits signs with new signage for Haskell's. The request is to replace a sign face on the existing 35 square foot free standing sign and replace the existing wall sign. Pylon Sign The sign face on the pylon sign is 8'8" by 4'0" for a total of 34.6 square feet with is the same as the old Sutler's sign. The background of the sign will be white with the text "Haskell's" in plum and "the wine people!" in green. The Haskell's logo will be plum, green and white. Freestanding signs in the BP-0 zoning district along Curve Crest Blvd are allowed to be 100 square feet in size and no taller than 6 feet in height. This sign meets all requirements of a freestanding sign. 2225 Curve Crest Blvd Page 2 Wall Sign The current sign Sutler's sign will be replaced with a new channel letter style wall sign. The sign will contain "Haskell's" in a white letters; "the wine people!" in green letter with a white halo; and the Haskell's logo. The sign will be 14'6" wide by 4'10" tall for a total of 70.083 square feet. The zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's retail space has approximately 98 feet facing Curve Crest Blvd. The proposed sign meets all requirements of a wall sign. Total Allowable Sign Area Multiple signs are permitted on a property in the business park districts if the aggregate total of all signage is under the "total allowable sign area". For this site, the total allowable signage area is 176 square feet. The total proposed signage on the site is 132.6 square feet which less than what the code permitted for this site. RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. No additional signage. FINDINGS The proposed signs meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and meet the intent of the West Business Park Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign • ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTERS WILL HAVE BLACK RETURNS & TRIM CAI' THE BUILDING. 8'-8„ Haskell's Tke W :e Peop/c! QTY: 2 641.4.40. FACE REPLACEMENTS FOR EXISTING ILLUMINATED D/F MONUMENT WHITE LEXAN FACE REPLACEMENTS WILL HAVE VIVID GREEN (230-156) & PLUM PURPLE (230-128) TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED TO THE FACE. n FACES WILL BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING CABINET. Ha/s/ k�ell'/s PRINTED COLORS Et GRADIENTS AS SHOWN MAY VARY FROM ACTUAL FINISHED COLOR. FACE REPLACEMENTS FOR EXISTING ILLUMINATED D/F MONUMENT SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-O" Lawrence :talk, iQn 846 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE, ST. PAUL MN 66104 W W W.IAWRENCESION.COM Haskell's HASKELL'S CLIENT- STILLWATER, MN LOCATION - RANDY ANDREWS ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE- NATE CHAPEK DESIGNER- HASKELL'S - STILLWATER DRAWING- 1-14-Be DATE- REVISION- CUS FOMER APPROVAL THESE PLANS ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF LAWRENCE SIGN AND ARE THE RESULT OF THE ORIGINAL WORK OF ITS EMPLOYEES. THEY ARE SUBMITTED TO YOUR COMPANY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF YOUR CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER TO PURCHASE THESE PLANS OR TO PURCHASE FROM LAWRENCE SIGN A SIGN MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO THESE PLANS. DISTRIBUTION OR EXHIBITION OF THESE PLANS TO ANYONE OTHER THAN EMPLOYEES OF YOUR COMPANY. OR USEOF THESE PLANS TO CONSTRUCT A SIGN SIMILAR TO THE ONE EMBODIED HEREIN. IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH EXHIBITION OCCURS, LAWRENCE SIGN EXPECTS TO BE REIMBURSED S 2. 0 O O IN COMPENSATION FOR TIME ANO EFFORT ENTAILED IN CREATING THESE PLANS. Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: April 2, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-16 Joe Heinen, SW Hold Co Design Review of proposed signage and elevation modifications 201 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: ZONING: HPC DATE: REVIEWERS: PREPARED BY: CC - Community Commercial CBD - Central Business District April 6, 2009 Community Dev. Director Michel Pogge, City Planner 01le DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a new storefront on the Chestnut Street and add a projecting sign on the building at 201 Main St S. The new storefront will allow for a second tenant on the first floor of the building. Storefront Facade Changes The building at 201 Main St S is part of the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National Register of Historic Districts. The building was built in 1965 and is noncontributing building to the district. Initially, the applicant seeks approval to add a new storefront to the building along Chestnut Street. Long term the applicant has plans for a complete renovation of the facade making it more architecturally appropriate for the district. The Downtown Design Manual Guidelines provides direction for storefront facades including the items such as transom windows, display windows, entry doors, and kick plates. The applicant's drawings show a wood storefront system with cast stone accents on either side of the storefront. Additionally, the applicant is proposing a tan and burnt orange striped canvas awning with the words "gifts flowers cards" on the canvas. 201 Main Street S Page 2 Long term the applicant is looking to complete a total facade renovation to the building. Included in the information are preliminary ideas. At this time, they are looking for feedback from the Commission on these plans. Future renovations would use materials similar to those proposed for the new storefront. The applicant has not provided a specific timeframe for these renovations. Projecting sign The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a projecting sign for Woodridge Hills. The proposed sign is 3'10" wide by 1'10" tall for a total of 5.8 square feet. The sign contains the words "Woodridge Hills" in red lettering on a textured burnt orange background. The sign will be non -illuminated. For retail storefront signs, the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The total sign of 5.8 square feet meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the requests in whole or in part. 2. Deny the requests. 3. Continue the request for more information to the May HPC meeting. The 60- day decision deadline for the request is May 24, 2009 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for May 4, 2009. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the requested projecting sign and phase I of the storefront facade as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1 The facade renovations are limited to the "Current Chestnut Entry Addition" shown on the plans dated March 20, 2009. 2. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 3. Detailed of any outdoor lighting fixture specifications must be submitted for review by City Staff before installation. Shielded light fixtures shall be used with appropriate wattage of light bulbs to be approved by City Staff. 4. The bottom of the project must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk. 5. No additional signage. attachments: Applicant's Form and packet nnaN -lcipmtinvDpn 1 n�� n Cyyy r<0> 0VPmmGJ ClmOm<Dym a aao°Z o9zDna> �cm a"' 3 p C 2 N m y< 2 z r D m N p< a < r S m=mN�^a Dpz p D - N< m p 9 Z m Z DZ mC m y N m mN m N N N p a y m D C 3 m N n m a n m' r n D AO p 2 3 * m y mm�pNppv�mm p`"m=m c�T< yp;zN� z 3 x Nam~mZ mzanpavim p NNm a ^' ap NN cozy"' rm m amyZm3mpoyan m,...gF <-3pa rna = mpl.cP<mp C <azr z Z S m z m m a rD <p p N a p o p m Z D N On r�nZyZcZp-ip,HNCNAZ< 2C(.LLPO1C.2U1 S MaM-qhm n::rvt 3l2L}"2;y79 522.43 PM DD1 ! MiI!IYli Bii5I5 !!! rali!1! ramrg!1!1!1!1!1!1!1! tera1!1444rara.'!I4o01:4 ammo' t;b:I l`III.rI'�11'IfiIIII1!til1M wrap. opt: 201 South Main - Chestnut Entry Stillwater, Minnesota :SNOISIA32! m 'ililili!ili!i;ili!i!i!i!ilt il!1!1 yli'i yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I,I,I,1,11111,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1, 1.1.1.I.I.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. I.I. 1111111111111111111111 11I1 I�I�I!I!I!I�I�1�1!I�I!I,hi,1�hhh I�1� Ii1!Ill!IiIl1i1i1i1iiililil!lil!I!li 11P!IMM1111I111PPI!Ill!111! lilil!IiliPlilililll!111iliPll1111 I,1,I,I,1,I,I,I,III,IIIII,I,I,1,I,I, !I!I!lil!I!I!I!I!I!I!1!I11111 4441150.1411144141!1!!!!! Illll!1111r111111111111r11111111r 1111111 !MIN lilil!I!Illilil!lililil!I!lil!Ill!li 111,1,1, I,I,1,1,111,1,1,1,111,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, I,I,I,I, 111,1,1,111,111,1111111,1,1,1,1,1, !!i!il!1i1!1!!i1ili!i!i1!1ili!!!!!il'i !I,I!I!III,I!I!I!I!I,11111,1i1!1,1,14i1!1,1!I .IIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIII111 1,1,11111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1,1,1,11 III 1,11111,1,1,11,1,1 I,I,I,I,I,I, I,1, 1 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 4314433 0 COPYRIGHT BY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. 1-:1R.il 200€$OP016.:i11 5 Mali.gnuMc vvi SMOS 095:2249 PM -n 0 DD2 201 South Main - Chestnut Entry Stillwater, Minnesota z wg g rn 7300 WEST 1477H STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 431-4433 0 COPYRIGHT BY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. Northwest Corner and Chestnut Elevation Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 ARcurT, Northwest Corner and Main Street Elevation Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 West Elevation along Main Street with Adjacent Buildings Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 Northeast Corner Looking Up Chestnut Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 ARruTT, East Elevation with Adjacent Buildings Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 otof ON, 51031H0UY HNO AO 1HOIeAtlO00 CE,r&tp(ISM 011SLYZ15S NI'1A311Yft 3idtly Y0S 31.105 133l15 HL1r11S3%r00EL o go elosau W yy la1emi1s /a;u3 -/ Tnu}sayo - wen Limos LOZ Yaa r North Elevation c W ©� EE tRov3 2000P.!5016-20t S Main-q so,.n0 =WOOS &22 e3 PM Z O m C o' (-) C n CD co C m a Q 0 111iP1ililiPlililig11111il{Iilililil1lililiQlililiPPlilililYilililiP11QQ1IIIIIMiP4lililililYi 111 I Iilll 11, 1111111111111111111111111i � L �dlllilllllll I IIIIIII 1111111111111111IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'l 111111111111111111111 IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II I11 111111111111111 �,I IIIII IIIIIII 1111111111111111111111111111 I IIII IIIIIII IIIIIIIIII III.II1IIIIIIl11111 IIIIII � — -'IIIIII Cn� IIIII = 1111111111111111111 I Il ll 111111111111 IIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII I (IIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIII I IIII IIIII � I I I IIIIIIIIIIII I IIII IIIIII I IIII IIIII I n n I III (IIIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIII I IIII 11111111111111111111111 I1. 1.1. I.I.I.I.II i. 161..L1 ICI 1,1,1,1,1,1 IIII 11;1111111�111I i1'I 11111IIIIII11l&ll II IIIIIII 11 IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII!iii I I I I,I,I,I,I,I�1,1 aaaaaa. I IRH'I'I"'I"'19112' 1;1;1 1 IIIIIII l hill1111111111; ,I Ili 111111111II 11111111111111 Il 1111111111 I IIIIIIIIII III IIIIIII I11111111 11111,1,dI IIIIIII 111111111111111111 III IIIIII 111 11111110,41 11111111,1,1 I 1 I 1111111111111111 1;IIIIIIIIIIII�I 4444444yyyyyl II 4!14454!14!14!1!I! !I IIIII:i;i;i;iii;i;i;i;i;i:iiii H ililil!liliiililil!lil lil!I!IAiIA� i III111i11II1111 I I11111111111111 11 i 1�I�I�11111111111�111111111111111111�I III III IIIIII(I(IIIIIIIIiI rIIII 1111111111111100,P !ihh IIIIII II IIIIII II I IIIIIII 1111111111111111111100111111111111111 IIIIIII (IIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIII I IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II lilili. itilililililililiiililililililililil li. IjlililililiNEMIMINElilili IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYII IIIIIII;111�1111111111111�111i111;lililili it fiMIS:lilililililili11111 i_ O —\ —\ O Er E Era DD1 m0 � s 201 South Main - Chestnut Entry Stillwater, Minnesota :sNoIsIn3a 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 431-4433 0 COPYRIGHT SY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. E.:Re S 2009109016-201 S Mai001,10o .01 31.00009 5'.22'49 PM re 50.-B" 25'-3" 54 r a T-10" W 2 • m N N 3' m s-r DD2 201 South Main - Chestnut Entry Stillwater, Minnesota SNOISIA321 ci 7300 WEST 147TH STREET SUITE 504 APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124-7580 (952) 431-4433 0 COPYRIGHT BY CNH ARCHITECTS, INC. Northwest Corner and Chestnut Elevation Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 Northwest Corner and Main Street Elevation Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433i,�Irm. West Elevation along Main Street with Adjacent Buildings t.EFT TURN YIELD ON GREEN err _ = a sssss Y. a _. Or▪ s us il• r `' rWSr rarer roar err: ▪ IMrn err r �•r�ir�i r as r.ao r ▪ - �Arrra& err In rr w War Mr .. �r ^• r via - w� NM MN PS - r�rr w =. M rsri - ��.111.111d..,..... ~ • r. •r� rMIMSrr !;uis■ Or NM •.rap �'▪ a Oa rrr w Mar w.ara wr MO wro pr Rear•-. rr r*Mil 0. 111. air Sr r arra am" arMilarrra m! a� isss.. �� W WEI raw =i �,,.,. or �r IN rwrMr'r. :arrr rr.p r erRIP r r�wwwww '� rrar.rnV1�!'rrar War Y t.tl4. 4r: Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 1124127d iCIIITECTS Northeast Corner Looking Up Chestnut Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 1211aV� East Elevation with Adjacent Buildings Comm. 09018 201 South Main, Stillwater, MN 7300 WEST 147TH ST., SUITE 504, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 (952) 431-4433 ARCNrT, - Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: REQUEST: HPC DATE: April 2, 2009 16th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards April 6, 2008 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 1/04 DISCUSSION Annually since 1994 the Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission has selected individuals and business to receive one of their annual Heritage Preservation Awards. These awards are given out in May as part of National Preservation Month. The Commission should select the award recipients at your April meeting in order to allow time for staff to order the plaques for presentation at the May 4th City Council meeting. Due to current budget constrains the plaques previously awarded by the HPC are cost prohibitive. On Monday staff will review a few options for plaques that can be purchased within budget. As a reference point, below is a listing of previous recipients. 1994 Pure Renovation Facade New Development New Design 1995 Renovation/Reuse Restoration - Signage New Development 1996 Renovation Reuse Facade Signage St. Croix Designs Architectural Antiques Glassory Block Wrap and Ship Commander Elevator J.P. Laskin The Depot The Lumber Baron's Hotel Cub Foods Cameo Costumes Traditions 2009-16th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 2 1997 Reuse of an Existing Building New Development Facade of a Building Signage 1998 Re -Use of an Existing Bldg New Development Facade of a Building Signage 1999 Reuse of an Existing Bldg Renovation of a Bldh Facade of a Building Signage Special Achievement 2000 Renovation of a Building Signage Heritage Design 2001 Reuse of an Existing Building Signage Use of Outdoor Space Design 2002 Special Achievement Award Design Award Facade of a Building Signage Architectural Contributions to Stillwater The Grand Banquet Hall A.B.S. Company Building Loggers Sebastian Joe's Maple Island Hardware Wash. County Historical Society Carriage House Sammies Womens Casual Attire Tasteful Thymes & Grandma's House in Stillwater Images of the Past John Karst Building BP Amoco BP Amoco Randall J. Raduenz Mark S. Balay Architects LaBelle Vie Freight House The Stillwater Territorial Prison Hotel Design River Market Community Coop and The Valley Bookseller Dreamcoat Cafe Camrose Hill Flower Studio Ascension Episcopal Church James Melton Joseph Wolf Building Jarchow and York Building Let there be light Antique Lighting Michael McGuire 2009-16th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 3 2003 Facade of a Building Transition of a Building Signage Heritage Award 2004 Signage Preservation Effort Historical Contribution Building Reuse Collaboration in Reuse of a Property 2005 Signage Facade of a Building Renovation of a Building Heritage Award 2006 Signage Renovation of a Building Renovation of a Building Residential rescue and restoration Residential Renovation 2007 Renovation of a Building Facade Renovation of a Building Signage Use of Outdoor Space Darla's Grill & Malt Shop Marx Wine Bar and Grille Brunswick Inn The Brick Ally The Central Hub The Peace House Donald Empson Kathleen Vadnais Gartner Studios Terra Springs Toy Lounge Whitey's The Arcola Building Warden's House Museum Aprille's Showers Tea Room 120 Main St N Tom and Sherry Armstrong Teddy Bear Park Barn Steven Bremer Former Joseph Wolf Brewery Building Thomas F Huninghake 209 Third St N John and Kim Brach 911 6th Ave S Stillwater Public Library 224 3rd St N Charlsen Trucking 114 Churchill St W Stillwater Art Guild Gallery 402 Main St N Stones Restaurant 324 Main St S 2009-16th Annual Heritage Preservation Awards Page 4 2008 Sesquicentennial Award For Long Term and Continual Preservation Signage and Building Mural Residential Preservation Residential Preservation Residential Preservation Historic Washington County Courthouse 101 Pine St W Pulp Fashion 102 Main St N Brent and Christine Peterson 502 Churchill St W David Johnson and Carroll Davis -Johnson 411 Sixth St S Gaye Lundstrom 907 Willard St W A copy of the 2008 HPC cases have been attached that can been used as a reference list by the Commission. Additionally, Don Empson has submitted a list of potential award recipients for your consideration. RECOMMENDATION Please bring any thoughts about possible awards and bring a list of your nominations to the April 6, 2009 meeting. Mike, These are my suggestions for the HPC awards this year. 1.) Suki Thomsen. She has spent hundreds of hours on the house photographs for the web site. She has also, for several years, given presentations on the historic styles of the old houses in town thereby raising the appreciation of the old houses. Suki is well connected, and knows lots of people so she has been an effective advocate for the old houses. 2.) John and Kim Brach. They now live at 515 N. Everett which house they rescued from almost certain demolition. A few years ago they restored the house next door at 423 W. Laurel Street. Before that they lived at 911 Sixth Ave. So. Which house they did a lot of work on. They have also been on HGTV with their work, and generally served in many capacities as a preservationist. They may already have received an award, if not, I think everyone would agree they are due. 3.) David and Holly Ludwigson. They bought 402 N. 4th a couple of years ago, and they have spent a fair amount of time and personal effort to spruce it up. They are quite interested in the house history, and have contacted some of the former owners to learn more about the history. David is an attorney, and a potential member of the HPC. 4.) Marie and Chuck Irgang. Marie has been very active in the preservation community, not only doing her house at 215 W. Pine, but helping out with the restoration of the old house across from the hospital (Peace House) and working with other people restoring their houses. Her husband is the CFO of the Minnesota Historical Society. 5.) Tom Huninghake at 209 N. Third Street. I think you know about him. The railings in his yard came from the Lift Bridge. 6.) Darrell and Monica Rhodes. They have spent four years working to restore their house at 620 West Pine. (They have also spent a lot of money!) They have met with many of the descendants of the Lammer's family who built the house, and generally been a force for preservation. I believe they also own the Cutler house which is now office space on the northeast corner of Chestnut & Third. 7.) Dwight and Rebecca Cummins. Over the years they have invested a lot of money and time into their old house at 612 South Third Street. The inside is very nice! They have also opened their house for house tours, and Dwight did some free legal work in the restoration of the house across from the hospital (Peace House.) He is a local attorney and they are both active in the community. 8.) Erik and Kathy Skon have preserved the 100-year-old log cabin in their yard at 233 South Harriet, spending several hundred dollars in the last year on maintenance. He is a former warden of the prison and generally a good guy. 9.) For years Kay Thueson has volunteered in the St. Croix Collection at the Stillwater Public Library. She indexed the building permits, is working on biographies of the contractors, and is generally a great asset to the historic community. She is also the public face for many people who have questions about Stillwater's history. All these houses are on the web site. I hope this helps give you some additional choices. Call me if you need more info. HPC Case Report Case # HPC Date Action Request Vote Zoning 2007-52 1/7/2008 Approved 6-0 Multiuse commerical development final phase of the Maple Island redevelopment. Case People Mainstream Development Partnership, Owner Address 227 Main St S CBD 2008-1 1/7/2008 Approved 6-0 Install set of LED illuminated chennel letter set 24" high Tuesday Morning Case People Address Spectrum Sign Systems Inc, Applicant 1266 Frontage Road West BP-C 2008-2 2/4/2008 Approved 6-0 RA Demolition request of a single family residence Case People Boyd Knudsen, Owner Address 1905 2nd St North 2008-3 1/7/2008 Approved 6-0 RB Design review for an accessory dwelling unit. Case People Mark S. Balay, Applicant Karl Diekman, Owner Address 522 Oak Street West 2008-5 2/4/2008 Approved 8-0 Design review of the installation of a new exhaust fan in suport of an expanded cookline. Case People Larry McGough, Owner Bob Sabes, Owner Address 305 Water Street South CBD 2008-6 2/4/2008 Approved 6-0 RB Design review of exterior modifications to the accessory dwelling unit. Case People Address Mark Balay, Applicant 522 Oak St W Karl Diekman, Owner 2008-7 3/3/2008 Approved 4-0 RB Demolition request for the rear (west) one story portion of the structure Case People Address David and Joan Fazendin, Owner 724 4th Street South 2008-8 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 RB Demolition request for a garage Case People Adam Johnston, Owner Address 1104 3rd St S Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 1 of 7 Case # HPC Date Action Request Vote Zoning 2008-9 3/3/2008 Approved 4-0 BP-C Design review of signage for Party City Case People Address Stuart Kline, Owner 1851 Market Drive Norquist Sign Company, Applicant 2008-10 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 BP-C Design review of signage for Enterprise rent -a -car Case People Address Ben Bonde, Applicant 14454 60th St N Ben Smith, Owner 2008-11 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design review for signage at 402 N Main St "Oh-Sus-anna" Case People Address Ann Tschida, Applicant 402 Main St N Terri Brine, Owner 2008-12 3/27/2008 Administrative Approval Design review of signage for Brick Pond Apartments Case People Address Washington County HRA, Owner 1635 Greeley Street South RA 2008-13 3/27/2008 Administrative Approval Design review of signage for Ann Bodlivick Apartments Case People Washington County HRA, Owner Address 2400 Orleans St 2008-14 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 Design review of the refacing of 201 Main Street and signage for the building. Case People John Heinen, Applicant Address 201 Main St So CBD 2008-15 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 RA Design review of new construction in the Neighborhood Conservation District. Case People Boyd Knudson, Owner Address 1905 2nd St N 2008-16 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design review of signage Case People Address Cecilia Loome, Applicant 223 Chestnut St E Gregor Pavlick Brownstone Properties, Owner Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 2 of 7 Case # HPC Date Action Vote Zoning Request 2008-17 4/7/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design review of parking structure Case People Address City of Stillwater, Applicant 200 2nd Street No City of Stillwater, Owner 2008-18 5/5/2008 Approved 5-0 BP-C Design review to replace an existing sign for "Days Inn" with "Americas Best Value Inn" Case People Duane Downey, Applicant Jim Patel, Owner Address 1750 Frontage Road 2008-19 5/5/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design review of store front facade for the replacement of storefront system and to repoen existing second floor window openings Case People Address Mark Balay, Applicant 124 Main St S Lynskey Properties, Owner 2008-20 5/5/2008 Approved 5-0 BP-0 Design review of signage for Certified Transmission for neon channel letter set and non -illuminated formed plastic letter set Case People Address Mary Ferraro, Applicant 2510 Curve Crest Blvd 2008-21 5/5/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design Review of proposed signage and elevation modifications for Smalley's Caribbean Barbeque Case People Address Tim Mckee, Applicant 423 Main St S Smalley's Caribbean Barbeque, Business NEW STILLWATER PROJECT LTD, Owner 2008-22 5/5/2008 Approved in part 5-0 CBD Design review for awning replacement, lighting and signage at Savories. Sign, awning, columns, and staining of the brick mortar approved. Painting of the building denied. Case People Address The Signmakers, Applicant 108 Main St N Sound Properties, Owner 102 Main St N 2008-23 6/2/2008 Administrative Approval RB Demolition request for a residence Case People Address Francis Brown, Owner 817 1st St South J.G. Hause, Applicant 2008-24 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition of shed/outbuilding Case People Andrew and Amber Barnick, Owner Address 219 Martha Street Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 3 of 7 Case # Request HPC Date Action Vote Zoning 2008-25 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 CBD Installation of a 25 square foot sign Case People Address Mike Lynskey, Owner 126 Main St S Abotbul Yaniv, Applicant 2008-26 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 BP Design review of signage on east and north for Lee Ann Chin's Case People Address Nordquist Sign Company, Applicant 1840 Market Drive Chase Properties, Owner 2008-27 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 Replace glass on strore front with matching door and new building sign for Maison Galleria Case People Address Peter Sampair, 223 Main St S CBD 2008-28 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition of a two car garage Case People Erin and Andrew Braun, Owner Address 1017 Pine St W 2008-29 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition of a single car garage Case People James and Diane Kleinke, Owner Address 1166thStSo 2008-30 6/2/2008 Approved 7-0 Design review of store front facade for new windows, sign and lighting for Smart Side Realty Case People Address Arlene Rivard, Owner 208 Main St S Smart Side Realty LLC, Applicant CBD 2008-31 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 BP-0 Installation of a new sign for Paws and Claws Pet Daycare Case People Daniel Lodge, Owner Address 199 Tower Drive 2008-32 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Replace store front at 108 Main St S for Main Cafe Case People Address Dan Roettger, Applicant 108 Main St So Mike Lynskey, Owner Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 4 of 7 Case # Request HPC Date Action Vote Zoning 2008-33 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 BP-C Design review of store front facade at the former Goodwill Site Case People Address Tim Keenan, Applicant 14480 60th St N Stillwater Market Square Partnership LLC, Owner 2008-34 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 RB Design review of multi tenant signage at 901 Third St S. Case People Address Mark Weyer, Owner 901 3rd St So 2008-35 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 Design review for new construction in the Conservation District at 1221 Broadway St N Case People SALA Architects, Applicant Steven and Jessica Meletiou, Owner Kelly Davis, Applicant Address 1221 Broadway St N RB 2008-36 7/7/2008 Approved 5-0 CBD Design review for signage Case People Address Greg Gartner, Owner 232 Main St Dana Daniels, Applicant Jan Dornself, Applicant 2008-37 8/18/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition request for a detached garage Case People Mark and Kristine Olson, Owner Address 921 5th St N 2008-38 8/18/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition request for a garage Case People Robert and Nora Hahn, Owner Address 502 Laurel St W 2008-39 8/18/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition request for a detached garage Case People Address Rybog Construction, Applicant 1104 5th St S Stephen and beverly Diemler, Owner 2008-40 10/6/2008 Approved 4-0 CBD Demolition for facade renovation/ window replacement, new entry and walk up window Case People Address Mark S Balay Architects, Applicant 132 Main St S James Qualey, Owner Greg Gartner, Owner Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 5 of 7 Case # HPC Date Action Vote Zoning Request 2008-41 9/2/2008 Approved 6-0 BP-C Design review of signage for the Courage Center Case People Scott Laage Leroy Signs, Applicant Courage Center, Owner Address 1460 Curve Crest Blvd 2008-42 9/2/2008 Approved 6-0 CP-C Design review of replacement signage at Super 8 Case People Lawrence Sign, Applicant Steve Roll, Owner Address 2190 Frontage Road 2008-43 9/2/2008 Approved 6-0 RB Demolition of a shed roof addition Case People Address Sandra Gray, Owner 1336 1st St S Ronald Weill, Owner 2008-44 9/2/2008 Approved 6-0 CBD Design review for exterior renovation for a penthouse addition, a 420 square foot buildout addition and 83 foot elevator tower Case People Address Mike Hoefler, Applicant 224 Main St So Chilson Tammy, Owner 2008-45 10/6/2008 Approved A demolition request of the rear entry porch to main structure. Case People Chris Rustad, Owner 5-0 Address 1330 3rd Ave So 2008-46 10/6/2008 Approved 5-0 RB Demolition request for a two -car garage Case People Nancy Hagstrom, Owner Address 1111 5th St So 2008-47 10/6/2008 Approved 4-0 RB Demoltion request for a 14' x 24' garage Case People Paul Frenchik, Owner Address 111 Sherburne st N 2008-48 10/6/2008 Approved 4-0 RB Design review of exterior renovation/replacement of siding, roof and and dormer expansion. Case People Address Mark Balay, Applicant 319 Pine St W Jeremy Drews, Owner Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 6 of 7 Room: Roofl DESCRIPTION Remove Tear off composition shingles (no haul off) Remove Additional charge for steep roof - 7/12 to 9/12 slope Additional charge for steep roof - 7/12 to 9/12 slope 3 tab - 25 yr. - (hvy.wt) comp. shingle rfg - incl. felt Ice & water shield R&R Drip edge R&R Metal roofing 23-L302-407 DESCRIPTION R&R Roll roofing Room Totals: Roofl Area Totals: Main Level 441.75 Exterior Wall Area 1,162.39 Surface Area 47.83 Total Ridge Length Area Items Total: Main Level Shed Main Level 1,162.39 Surface Area 245.89 Total Perimeter Length QUANTITY UNIT COST 4.80 SQ 4.80 SQ 5.33 SQ 5.33 SQ 240.00 SF 109.00 LF 240.00 SF 42.75 11.47 19.00 200.76 1.57 2.00 4.53 QUANTITY UNIT COST Area Totals: Shed 441.75 Exterior Wall Area 1,162.39 Surface Area 47.83 Total Ridge Length Area Items Total: Shed 3.85 SQ 123.35 11.62 Number of Squares 11.62 Number of Squares 11.62 Number of Squares 47.83 Total Ridge Length RCV DEPREC. 205.20 55.06 101.27 1,070 05 321.02 113.04 65.40 87.20 326.16 RCV DEPREC. 376.80 218.00 1,0 474.89 3,588.47 3,588.47 142.47 ACV 205.20 55.06 101.27 749.03 263.76 152.60 761.04 Page: 5 ACV 332.42 968.09 2,620.38 245.89 Total Perimeter Length 968.09 2,620.38 245.89 Total Perimeter Length 3,588.47 968.09 2,620.38 ti Gft-'g%Ejs2.. 2f 3C /R sxa2E, sTeu1c 1M7-t u vva— FoR ivt , bLArre_ rawntit4'TrON ReP 1'Q / Rt L t c.E obf NCT 315-88.97 - ry,- I 0 f'f1 .--- ( 3 3,.P I TEC-UDR L R%-ram-rioN / r Q -- V P-TE 2► 011 --�-- !'7 to . 2 2 lortgzIcxt Ft rvit-i C?.& t-Ntof Qfa rrecr. /5t2uc,Tc,4 -L- 7 5,.'3 r®knutson ■, Construction Services Job Date Subject �+Pp.tZ RE.SNbv - Gtv?"6t of'P• 6Ltiv019TtorJ FuuNDA'TitrAl R,Or1( : Hr% - E%c Vprrt FooT,rv(os /will-LS t9co cm Q 140 co firsnNGS L. 1N0. x einvit, X bW '/ l .16 , %Wiz 5.trnA rdS )... 3' x / ID . x ire se, M M. ►3yps Q- r26." Fv W rr 4 1.. TWO' ,r �'' x 2 1F 1i30 F412 w r 5 L. 1 wu+N °l. tin X 2 p.by lice -rat p4 . ..1 yps to tar' Rfwr. wm„w ... S-WO I`% 72Z.' /X. /426: lar/t,.46 21925:6° 3 1 614> •e4) * Doe, Nan: loci , E Demo OF £-f.isrF, Wflorr i giaws,nl e*,0 Pot„,ki v5 pI6:4S, $' ' +2'' X iyp' 82lc14Lt .6 , aequ,aecl61.484'S Avo o2 B 0rc nw-cS ... 02 SIQuloT'u v rri. ROM i vL or speAGMt els' ittmet) Nis compAr 1Lcv4.• cm:se :per/ / 'S. Minneapolis Iowa Rochester 763-546-1400 319-351-2040 507-280-9788 rnwZL`21Ort- craf�- g€ 4 2. - /202 Cdt.t4 ZIP ' Z.- 12)' IC ' Q.Tezeit 2.3.2`) 445 r G2 St Ski 3 L` - z-f r z)( ►$' Taa+-�-7) e !7.&4. !ab ‘ • 5,?. t„5Z % Fu900_ c/11(9 -s44. Zy//0Y/b Fn 1 i6. Q /6%W 1 502. /Z �2 44 0 4 - 4)( Tr Dale.' 5nNizoietom C 1977 (/ t s 7. (. ) 4 laM, a Wp>-1. 6146 `) Z� a X16' SIF d. j,%b- & 9. w 5 71 140 l,n+9- tA, MA_ ViA4TE el - 2X 4 Y /6' -Mr0 e_ 4).511 $$ vvtr c z /aauc _. I b— z x g x/ e 6.54 b 5, pro El SKEO its fanv z 211 - Z. X )4 /y gv /65Z 3%.II- WI $ Iz %I xw is fko g / ." 191. Pi Liz 5c ) ZO - 1 X 4 x /b t 3a e /0. S' 3 j tiJ. 7O ilsOf 4. G,Fnuir ien11-1 /5 {c- kxi- c.iA443 coxP✓ e l/./LI /4`7.10 0PINI OtS3 to - let hn Corso �1�-w•S wino •1 pa%L Kitttore -L - 2_X ) L x IC Ka• 4pk liNvi'iVtfl t- Lx01i".4(ei Fff57nW5 ,,. ,s‘w. sr,t►t. e (03s-4) 35/w 3RP /v00 •Cy X 1;14.xo 76 C97 ,45- X /v % -7 (,T/ - 2 I N3 L - X /07, R''. ►'�2 1.44. V0454-40-1 Prt- sRrli rr=2TtA-42. L. R.�STOS TILJ f-Ascm--$p. - 1 X X /6c 2010.3? ifti ��$ — l 't Fs x /G cam-yrz e 25.79 2-00.3 a Cczfitraziw. 51- - I X (o � crflmp �' l2.�j ti,, . 1(5- - 1 1F `d(..ton42 e 5. k8- it 7. 4t) t6QAuWIDOW — IXCoX /6' e&rorf4 l .9c- /7Q.5S; sit); NCB•- qv X l 6; (etn n top l V i-1. 3 2 G real s Z $ w 1. Cwecta.e.k Houst; 5tyw Q 152.14 Z 55-4 • SZ Net Hrno - k. i3+rnrrratv+o w,Nor.ws L Dei..46 rzv e i3s. gyp :— 1 - 3' '+mac.. (2081L -f 1-sc' ) Deo& 140 i'3S !Att. tAA'`t yYt._ /t•tDw-(TyveiL �r►SfNcV1-S c. L•'S , Ppm .. 5 - 4Klt (Roa,mnsbarm,{la �'•� , 5800 KRUEGER LANE NORTH OAK PARK HTS, MN 55082 Phone: (651) 430-9626 Fax: (651) 430-2577 Store # 3129 Store ID: STLW ZOLLER, JOHN M 510 SYCAMORE STREET WEST Stillwater, MN 55082 (651) 430-2141 QTY DESCRIPTION SKU IDEAL Door Estimate 05/19/2009 PRICE EXTENDED EACH PRICE 1 MODEL = MH5P-SQ23 Carriage House Hemlock Paint Grade w/ Stiles And Rails Constructi( 1 9/16" Thick Exterior And 1/4" Thick Imported Hardwood Interior Backer Door Width = 8' Door Height = 7' Finish = Unfinished Wood SECTIONS: 3 PANELS: 2 STRUTS: 3 TRACK SIZE: 2" MOUNT: Bracket HANDLE: (2) Spade Lift Handles And (1) Spade Lift Plate 400-0308 $1,292.46 1 LIFT: 15" Radius EZ-Set Torsion Spring Requires 17" Of Headroom 400-0307 $0.00 1 LOCK: Not Included For A MH5P-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 1 CENTER STILE: Opener Center Stile Included For A MH5P-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 1 MODEL = MF21-SQ23 Carriage House Custom Crafted Steel Door 1-3/8" Thick 4 layer door (Steel + Insulation + Steel + Composite Overlay) Door Width = 8' Door Height = 7' Finish = White Steel + White Composite Overlay SECTIONS: 4 PANELS: 2 STRUTS: 0 TRACK SIZE: 2" MOUNT: Bracket / HANDLE: One Black Spade Step Plate and One Pair Black Spade Lift Handles 400-0308 $1,130.22 $1,130.22 1 LIFT: 12" Radius EZ-Set Torsion Spring Requires 15" Of Headroom 400-0307 $0.00 $0.00 1 LOCK: Not Included For A MF21-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 $0.00 1 CENTER STILE: Opener Center Stile Included For A MF21-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Sale = $2,7 L2.68 This is an estimate. It is given only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based upon this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE CUSTOMER WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY OF THE MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by customer and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate, including but not limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE CUSTOMER. BECAUSE OF WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. r Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 29, 2009 APPLICANT: Levi and Joleigh Breeggemann REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a portion of a primary dwelling unit LOCATION: 505 Maple St W HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 1, 2009 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planne0 CASE NO.: 09-27 BACKGROUND Levi and Joleigh Breeggemann property owners of 505 Maple St W, are requesting a demolition permit for a portion of their primary dwelling unit. The area is a 5' x 7' addition off the Kitchen. In its place the Breeggemanri s are planning a 5' x 13' addition. The exact age of the original addition could not be determined and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office; however, the property owner believes that the addition is older than 50 years of age. After reviewing the structure, style, and condition of the structure it leads staff to conclude that the addition is more than 50 years old. Since the addition appears to be over 50 years old, it is by definition considered to have potential historic significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being TOTALLY removed a new addition is not subject to the infill design criteria. SPECIFIC REQUEST 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 2 The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish a portion of the primary dwelling unit. 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 3 EVALUATION OF REQUEST Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review... Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the addition could not be determined it is assumed to be over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; The legal description of the property was included in the application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; Photos from various angles are included in the packet. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the 5' x 7' room directly adjoining the kitchen is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant has included that the 5' x 7' addition has rot warranting demolition. A letter from Sunrise Design and Constriction confirms the property owners statement and notes that it would be impossible to add any addition due to the lack of a sound foundation. No bid for renovating the structure was included in the application material. (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant has indicated that they wish to rebuild in the location of the addition. The new addition would be approximately 5' x 13'. 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 4 (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not totally being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant that restoration of a structure is an alternative to demolition; however, they note that this does not seem to be a reasonable alternative. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant has indicated that they have not advertised the structure for sale since it involves only a small portion of the home that cannot be reasonable relocated. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the demolition permit as presented. 2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes there are alternates to demolishing the garage. 3. Continue the public hearing until the July 6, 2009 Commission meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is July 17, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Permit No-Ob-7//* 7 Demolition Request Permit Fee $150* .2��� Receipt No. "Y Address of Project: SO5 L .3 Parcel No.: Lot oC Block Subdivision SAirNS ADM —OWE —TRW az y cc STLWATER Applicant: I F J 13 cE% VIA NA/ Address: 5 a5 /7A,PLE ST- Telephone No.: (76 3) 1-` 0 - _gLif Owner if different than Applicant: Address: Telephone No. Type of Structure: Age of Structure: ? Condition of Structure: VERY ?cbR Il fIAS »o Vou N DAZE ) Intended Use of Site after Demolition: A 5 x 13 Ao1�tTCaN zi.:/ 2 S q 09 Signature of Ap . nt Date 5 q1® Signature of 0 er Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: ❑ Approved City Planner/Community Development Director ❑ Denied Date May 9, 2009 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: The structure in question is attached to the kitchen area of 505 Maple Street West on the western side of the property. It is 5 I/a feet from the adjoining lot. The earliest the structure would have been built is 1894 when the house was built. I do not believe the kitchen or this structure were original to the home. The structure is 2x4 stick built and a 2x6 floor joist which were placed on a concrete footing. The end of the joist no longer rests on the footing due to rot. Now the supporting joist rests on the ground. The only history to this house to my knowledge is that it was built to house the lumberjacks and it was a "kit house" from Montgomery Wards. The requirements per section 34-1.5 are as follows: 1. A map showing the location and the measurements as well as the addresses of adjoining lots is included in this application. 2. The legal description is as follows — Lot 2, block 2, Sabins Addition of the city of Stillwater, Washington County, MN 3. Photos are included with this application. 4. The structure is a 5x7 foot room directly adjoining the kitchen. The three exterior walls would be removed as well as the floor and footing. 5. The reasons for the demolition is the structure is unsound due to rot, has very little insulation if any and is too costly to heat, is an eyesore in the house, and is not functional for our needs. Enclosed is a contractor's statement that the cost to rehabilitate or stabilize the structure is greater than to rebuild. 6. Replacement structure which would serve as a utility/mud room and entry goes over the current foot print and extends an additional 6 feet to the south. 7. The future use of this area occupied by the structure in question will be in compliance with any pertinent zoning requirements. 8. Alternatives to the demolition are few. There is little reusable material in the structure. Stabilization and restoration of the structure, as mentioned, would be nearly impossible and cost prohibitive. Any reuseable material will be recycled. 9. The structure has not been advertised for sale because any reuseable materials will be put back into the structure. Our desire is to maintain the historic simplicity and integrity of our home. Preservation and restoration of the unique character of our home is of paramount concern to us as home owners. Sincerely, Levi M. Breeggemann Joleigh A. Breeggemann V1 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION To the City of Stillwater and the Breeggemann family, After inspecting the structure in mention we have determined that it would not be beneficial to save. The 5x7 footprint of the structure is not part of the existing architecture of the home and does not meet code for a dwelling space. The structure does not have a foundation, it is not insulated which is an energy concern, and is beginning to rot where the foundation should be. Also, this structure was not added or built with the original historic architecture of the main home. We recommend the removal of this structure to improve the architectural appeal and preserve the historic value of the home. Tim Jozefow Vice President Sunrise Design and Construction, LLC 651-303-7784 9776 Mendel Road • Stillwater, MN 55082 • Office: (651) 439-0785 • Fax: (651) 351-0788 aTtokitxTieffQ ne 12 Efs-rowc $2 ltto ro\ 0 -Jo�tN zt.e2 - 1-oc.)Pcrm P'T 5LO etc/Awoke, s172ET Wcr RAI3C /RE5HOR,. 5TeUCTL 2 EZtocvw F"oRwt , R.Y. wJ TTCN 0.16cen • RePIQ / R01,KE laoOF'1N'- S'fQ1vtC.T(�Y L ¶reA vv , M.E9Ri J12_ 31 t,'Ve' 3 5 8. 97 - W-IL 2,L 0 Nl 1 (0 3 3 n 00RC.x I TEC L R a-1- rLPT ON / 2.tdQ to . 22 I1.3Tt yZtcQ Fi rv1M C '� M+ Tt>21 rq2 c) P- J- \,i F- bON Zeta ITECr. /`hared -L- 90A-I'(L UNU 62►NW¢c,) - { 2POT21fri13 .. 7 5, 13 5v ,3'S%:53 r knutson . Construction Services Job Date Subject RE6HoR GA -PAGE of'f 614Nor9T,ory S► CDC) v S Rt:PM(: Mr�p �Xc uwTC Foo- nrvG,S %191-CS c Q.. 1.50 fot2!wt fdc$f1Nc5S L. I ND' I( trots s zw y ‘,.1644- %wi2. reCTIV L. Z. X MD. K y'" st• M. r3yps a r25.- F wr1,�s �.. rwo' i a' x z y.O PCM,12 w rtw°J 3 wvN e, site-wa �C 2.p.1 is 6o page pit. Z l yps Q off e /72Z."7 /626: 076.46 219257" fbrzw. 1MRTr`R•Wt... DP P ;Icol. , " ,rye y 6O Rowel omac- 121(0.Gv Dot, Nor k i.voE Uemo or £Y.1STtit Ro ta°../ Wen"rn5 INN° %WeinS DIMS, air Xre X iyor Bilicx. 40.46 , 2rqu,rrec/stft S Avo eNt B0K ovurs ... OR Ore.wTt►aM1 Roma. or STt2ttcrtA• C6P6t7D Aka oznnwierZci4- Gangs24c ronr 2t4TES. Minneapolis Iowa Rochester 763-546-1400 319-351-2040 507-280-9788 Shed Main Level DESCRIPTION Room: Roofl 1,162.39 Surface Area 245.89 Total Perimeter Length 11.62 Number of Squares 47.83 Total Ridge Length QUANTITY UNIT COST RCV DEPREC. ACV Remove Tear off composition shingles (no haul off) Remove Additional charge for steep roof - 7/12 to 9/12 slope Additional charge for steep roof - 7/12 to 9/12 slope 3 tab - 25 yr. - (hvy.wt) comp. shingle rfg - incl. felt Ice & water shield R&R Drip edge R&R Metal roofing 23-L302-407 DESCRIPTION 4.80 SQ 4.80 SQ 5.33 SQ 5.33 SQ 240.00 SF 109.00 LF 240.00 SF 42.75 11.47 19.00 200.76 1.57 2.00 4.53 QUANTITY UNIT COST 205.20 55.06 101.27 1,070.05 376.80 218.00 1,087.20 321.02 113.04 65.40 326.16 RCV DEPREC. 205.20 55.06 101.27 749.03 263.76 152.60 761.04 Page: 5 ACV R&R Roll roofing 3.85 SQ 123.35 474.89 142.47 332.42 Room Totals: Roofl Area Totals: Main Level 441.75 Exterior Wall Area 1,162.39 Surface Area 47.83 Total Ridge Length 11.62 Number of Squares 3,588.47 968.09 2,620.38 245.89 Total Perimeter Length Area Items Total: Main Level Area Totals: Shed 441.75 Exterior Wall Area 1,162.39 Surface Area 47.83 Total Ridge Length 11.62 Number of Squares 3,588.47 968.09 2,620.38 245.89 Total Perimeter Length Area Items Total: Shed 3,588.47 968.09 2,620.38 crare- &024c-st 24 RON t2 -12. 21144e_ TEZg 4 ti4PI=L.vs o wit44. 511.05S - Z,s u Xis' YF c /Pr 6-9. w Ste"/ 71 ! O t,,NA• taPA? L 4wgTE CI - 21 H r 1t,' 712fro e.. G.5 L/ S$ YKrx Zy /e cut ... lb — 2 x 14X J/.,„ e. 6.54 b5. 40 Co•ti.e Up - Z 12 Y IC ' QTReitTe Z3.27 665'.e'Z St 6640) 3 1, % - z' i z ' 'a -ra y, e !?.&W. !oa (• . 6o5Ze-4 vzook 5lits4--414. ZII0X//, 6/2 iG a /s,w I50Z.la. .a.LI:t1 3/14_ 4 sF F( S Qa.' Sruaoafu.Ua C 19.1 (I 1 S i • 1A) SKtO Its f12 rww.2 214 - Z x a $ / y rvt Id,. 5 a 3%. £/5' viol44 SHs1ti1 12 - 3/4 xq Yfy Pw Q i$ 1" /9/• 64/ la sy-Ci clt4) -i 40 - 1 x y X /b' ac r 6 /o. 5y 3 t17, 70 wee/PA. u.� 15 14.- IXS- col kJ e 1/./LI /47•/0 aP tvAus y 3 (p - iv, 'veto 1=0-4,-S WINO - ZX )'Z ( 6, gm. • 4a+►taw€¢E I rcrtytAti — 000 save. ,, i:'ksrrvnRs , e cln' , ,. R�btaP••,sewsC»I. /7.411 1-1 Nt /6jb 5 5"1.6y X b14,y, hMRrrtsv2i Pit_ tia4. reisc, $p. s - 1 X S x /(, e_ 25,71 2.o6.32 fo bb. $ — I>< $ x /Gcream_ e 25.75 24O.32- S e14.ES . c e.4*.YLT2Iw. sr$- - t X ts' crb)* e l2. 5' 4 y. %5" - ► y � ti 7.1(6) wisp l$ (o X I (Dr42 top LJ /6.`76. % c/8'41. 3 2 fz 54k Dt12J2 t+tPO fvOcitoS p92-A) K.E tucie w '+' CtiQ.i?a'Gk Nast w e 1252. y4 Z 5-I4. 5'Z - k c i`�+rnrTE� c 3' T L p08111_ .f 1 scrub.) D . 140 1-3.c 540 .— mVt, • tAq tT1 -& &_ /+4owg. -C.1'yieat., rnsrwcvl-s C 4AL , .PF TJ ...) /6o0_`v 54 - 4Xlr (fteto"n, r►e:,1P0 C0 i 7,.2T- /U % -7 (0.^T7.2 r b `(Z 4-13L - t9ytste x Io"jo 151 •i3 ) 5800 KRUEGER LANE NORTH OAK PARK HTS, MN 55082 Phone: (651) 430-9626 Fax: (651) 430-2577 Store # 3129 Store ID: STLW ZOLLER, JOHN M 510 SYCAMORE STREET WEST Stillwater, MN 55082 (651) 430-2141 QTY DESCRIPTION SKU IDEAL Door Estimate 05/19/2009 PRICE EXTENDED EACH PRICE 1 MODEL = MH5P-SQ23 Carriage House Hemlock Paint Grade w/ Stiles And Rails Constructi( 1 9/16" Thick Exterior And 1/4" Thick Imported Hardwood Interior Backer Door Width = 8' Door Height = 7' Finish = Unfinished Wood SECTIONS: 3 PANELS: 2 STRUTS: 3 TRACK SIZE: 2" MOUNT: Bracket HANDLE: (2) Spade Lift Handles And (1) Spade Lift Plate 400-0308 $1,292.46 $1,292.46 1 LIFT: 15" Radius EZ-Set Torsion Spring Requires 17" Of Headroom 400-0307 $0.00 1 LOCK: Not Included For A MHSP-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 1 CENTER STILE: Opener Center Stile Included For A MH5P-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 MODEL = MF21-SQ23 Carriage House Custom Crafted Steel Door 1-3/8" Thick 4 layer door (Steel + Insulation + Steel + Composite Overlay) Door Width = 8' Door Height = 7' Finish = White Steel + White Composite Overlay SECTIONS: 4 PANELS: 2 STRUTS: 0 TRACK SIZE: 2" MOUNT: Bracket /_ HANDLE: One Black Spade Step Plate and One Pair Black Spade Lift Handles 400-0308 $1,130.22 $1,130.22 1 LIFT: 12" Radius EZ-Set Torsion Spring Requires 15" Of Headroom 400-0307 $0.00 1 LOCK: Not Included For A MF21-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 1 CENTER STILE: Opener Center Stile Included For A MF21-SQ23 Door 400-0307 $0.00 $0.00 Total Sale = $2,7fL2.68 $0.00 $0.00 This is an estimate. It is given only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based upon this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject. to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE CUSTOMER WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY OF THE MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by customer and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate, including but not limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE CUSTOMER. BECAUSE OF WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. I Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 29, 2009 APPLICANT: Levi and Joleigh Breeggemann REQUEST: Demolition Permit for a portion of a primary dwelling unit LOCATION: 505 Maple St W HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: June 1, 2009 PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plann CASE NO.: 09-27 1 BACKGROUND Levi and Joleigh Breeggemann property owners of 505 Maple St W, are requesting a demolition permit for a portion of their primary dwelling unit. The area is a 5' x 7' addition off the Kitchen. In its place the Breeggemann's are planning a 5' x 13' addition. The exact age of the original addition could not be determined and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office; however, the property owner believes that the addition is older than 50 years of age. After reviewing the structure, style, and condition of the structure it leads staff to conclude that the addition is more than 50 years old. Since the addition appears to be over 50 years old, it is by definition considered to have potential historic significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review the demolition request. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not being TOTALLY removed a new addition is not subject to the infill design criteria. SPECIFIC REQUEST 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 2 The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish a portion of the primary dwelling unit. 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 3 EVALUATION OF REQUEST Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic, the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review... Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for issuance of a demolition permit." A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the addition could not be determined it is assumed to be over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of a demolition permit by the Commission. (1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties; This information is included in the attached application. (2) A legal description of property and owner of record; The legal description of the property was included in the application. (3) Photographs of all building elevations; Photos from various angles are included in the packet. (4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished; The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the 5' x 7' room directly adjoining the kitchen is proposed to be demolished. (5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition; The applicant has included that the 5' x 7' addition has rot warranting demolition. A letter from Sunrise Design and Constriction confirms the property owners statement and notes that it would be impossible to add any addition due to the lack of a sound foundation. No bid for renovating the structure was included in the application material. (6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or structure to be demolished is located; The applicant has indicated that they wish to rebuild in the location of the addition. The new addition would be approximately 5' x 13'. 505 Maple St W Breeggemann Demolition Permit Page 4 (7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements; The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential. This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not totally being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. (8) A description of alternatives to the demolition; The applicant that restoration of a structure is an alternative to demolition; however, they note that this does not seem to be a reasonable alternative. (9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible. The applicant has indicated that they have not advertised the structure for sale since it involves only a small portion of the home that cannot be reasonable relocated. ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the demolition permit as presented. 2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes there are alternates to demolishing the garage. 3. Continue the public hearing until the July 6, 2009 Commission meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is July 17, 2009. RECOMMENDATION Review and take action on the request. attachment: Application and supporting documents from the applicant Heritage Preservation Commission Demolition Request Permit Demolition Permit No prn Fee $150* Receipt No. a/7 Address of Project: SO5 MPLE Parcel No.: Lot Block 2 Subdivision Spy /'S ADDITTCW "-OWE cr y STTLWATER Applicant: I F\Q 13I EGG, VutAc /J Address: 5 a5 /` PLE S Telephone No.: (76 3) Li ` 3 c1L1 Owner if different than Applicant: Address: Telephone No. Type of Structure: Age of Structure: Condition of Structure: VERY Pa5i; 1 HAS NO rou N DA-TICW Intended Use of Site after Demolition: 5X33 ADr To, Signature of 0 / r er SA /09 Date s / log Date *After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. A building permit must be obtained with the City of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building permit is based on the valuation of the demolition project. Office Use Only HPC Review Date: ❑ Approved City Planner/Community Development Director ❑ Denied Date May 9, 2009 City of Stillwater Heritage Preservation Commission 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission: The structure in question is attached to the kitchen area of 505 Maple Street West on the western side of the property. It is 5 '/a feet from the adjoining lot. The earliest the structure would have been built is 1894 when the house was built. I do not believe the kitchen or this structure were original to the home. The structure is 2x4 stick built and a 2x6 floor joist which were placed on a concrete footing. The end of the joist no longer rests on the footing due to rot. Now the supporting joist rests on the ground. The only history to this house to my knowledge is that it was built to house the lumberjacks and it was a "kit house" from Montgomery Wards. The requirements per section 34-1.5 are as follows: 1. A map showing the location and the measurements as well as the addresses of adjoining lots is included in this application. 2. The legal description is as follows — Lot 2, block 2, Sabins Addition of the city of Stillwater, Washington County, MN 3. Photos are included with this application. 4. The structure is a 5x7 foot room directly adjoining the kitchen. The three exterior walls would be removed as well as the floor and footing. 5. The reasons for the demolition is the structure is unsound due to rot, has very little insulation if any and is too costly to heat, is an eyesore in the house, and is not functional for our needs. Enclosed is a contractor's statement that the cost to rehabilitate or stabilize the structure is greater than to rebuild. 6. Replacement structure which would serve as a utility/mud room and entry goes over the current foot print and extends an additional 6 feet to the south. 7. The future use of this area occupied by the structure in question will be in compliance with any pertinent zoning requirements. 8. Alternatives to the demolition are few. There is little reusable material in the structure. Stabilization and restoration of the structure, as mentioned, would be nearly impossible and cost prohibitive. Any reuseable material will be recycled. 9. The structure has not been advertised for sale because any reuseable materials will be put back into the structure. Our desire is to maintain the historic simplicity and integrity of our home. Preservation and restoration of the unique character of our home is of paramount concern to us as home owners. Sincerely, Levi M. Breeggemann Joleigh A. Breeggemann v 1 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION To the City of Stillwater and the Breeggemann family, After inspecting the structure in mention we have determined that it would not be beneficial to save. The 5x7 footprint of the structure is not part of the existing architecture of the home and does not meet code for a dwelling space. The structure does not have a foundation, it is not insulated which is an energy concern, and is beginning to rot where the foundation should be. Also, this structure was not added or built with the original historic architecture of the main home. We recommend the removal of this structure to improve the architectural appeal and preserve the historic value of the home. Tim Jozefow Vice President Sunrise Design and Construction, LLC 651-303-7784 9776 Mendel Road • Stillwater, MN 55082 • Office: (651) 439-0785 • Fax: (651) 351-0788 St!I1watr THE' A I R T H P t. A. C F O F M I N N[ 5 0( A DATE: May 29, 2009 APPLICANT: Richard Anderson REQUEST: Design Review for Lowell Inn Annex LOCATION: 102 North 2nd Street HPC REVIEW DATE: April 6, May 4 and June 1, 2009 PREPARED BY: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director CASE NO.: DR/09-13 On April 6 the Heritage Preservation Commission began reviewing the design for the Lowell Inn Annex, which was tabled until. May 4, 2009. At the May meeting the HPC approved the design review permit with 12 conditions. One of the conditions was that prior to the issuance of a building permit, samples of the exterior materials and their colors was required to be submitted to the HPC for review and approval. The material samples and colors have been submitted and will be available for review at the HPC meeting on June 1. ti I Iwater THE BIRTHPLACF (1 F MNNESOA Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 29, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-19 APPLICANT: Mike Monn, HAF Architects REQUEST: Design Review of proposed U.S. Post Office and general office building at 107 3rd St N LOCATION: 107 3rd St N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial and A/O Administrative Office ZONING: CBD - Central Business District and PA - Public Administration HPC DATE: June 1, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a 7,600 square foot new office building at 107 3rd St N. The building is a single store office building with walk out level office in the lower area. The building will house a U.S. Post Office retail store in approximately 2,000 square feet with the remaining area available as leased general office space. SPECIFIC REQUESTS In order to develop this building as proposed, the applicant has requested design review approval for the exterior for the project. BACKGROUND Since the May meeting, the applicant has revised their plans in a number of areas including adding lighting detail, a trash enclosure, and signage. Additionally, the applicant will present building materials to the Commission at the meeting on June 1 for review and discussion. The applicant is showing seven projecting signs (blade signs) on the building. City Code restricts the use of projecting signs to no more than one on each street frontage with each limited to six square feet in size. Staff recommends that abiding by this code restriction be made a condition of approval. 107 3rd St N Page 2 PREVIOUS ACTION BY THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION At the May 4th HPC meeting the Commission reviewed the design review permit. The Commission voted 4-0 to approve a design review permit for the foundation subject to the following conditions: 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan set dated 04-17-2009, which is on file in the Community Development Department. 2. No rooftop equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the site. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an exterior lighting plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The lighting plan shall show the fixture type, wattage, height, location and exterior lighting intensity. All lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light sources shall be shielded from direct view. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 6. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 8. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 3rd Street. 9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, final plans for the trash enclosure will need to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. No trash dumpsters shall be located outside a trash enclosure. 10. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 11. Prior to the issuance of a full building permit, final colors for the building, including, but not limited to, the brick, rain screen, window trim, fascia, and trim, shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 12. Prior to the issuance of a full building permit, material samples of all the elements, including brick, rain screen, retaining wall and stairs, shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 13. The applicant shall discuss with the USPS adding a second entrance to the USPS retail area. If the USPS does not want a second entrance, the applicant will need to rethink the main tower entrance. a. The applicant has indicated that the USPS has agreed to a second entrance through the tower. 14. This design permit approval is only for the building foundation. A second design permit from the HPC is required for the remaining portions of the building and the rest of the site. 107 3rd St N Page 3 ACTION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION The City Planning Commission (CPC) reviewed variance requests for this project at their May 11th meeting. The CPC voted 8-0 to approve the requested variances. ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives that can be considered: A. Approval. If the proposed design review plans are found acceptable to the HPC, they could be approved. B. Denial. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the downtown design guidelines, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. C. Approval in part. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the July 6, 2009 meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is June 16, 2009; however, the City can extend this deadline once for an additional 60 days. RECOMMENDATION With the changes presented in the plans and if the Commission is satisfied with the material selections being made by the applicant then staff would recommend approval of the design permit, with the following conditions: 1. The project construction shall be in compliance with the plan set dated 05/15/2009, which are on file in the Community Development Department. 2. No rooftop equipment shall be visible to the general public. Any exterior mechanical units shall be fully screened. The location and screening of the equipment shall be reviewed and found acceptable by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Sign permit applications must be submitted to and approved by the HPC prior to installation of any permanent signs on the site. 4. Projecting signs (blade signs as described on the plans) shall be limited to six square feet in size with one sign along Myrtle Street and one sign along Third Street. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 6. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent surface. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the plan shall be submitted to the Middle St. Croix WMO for review and any changes to the plan required by Middle St. Croix WMO and found reasonable by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into the plans. 8. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from 3rd Street. 9. All minor modifications to the Design Review Permit shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" shall rest with the City Administrator. 10. A second entrance to the USPS retail area shall be made from the main tower along Third Street. attachments: Site plan and Applicant's materials -PROGRESS LIGHTING Progress Lighting 701 Millennium Blvd. Greenville, South Carolina 29607 Incandescent Catalog No. P5644 6" Square Wall Finish Bronze -20 White Black -30 -31 1 D Lamping 2-250w QPAR38, 150w BR40 Outdoor Type -20 -30 -31 P5644 ❑ ❑ ❑ Dimensions (Inches) AB CD 6 18 8-7/8 8 Specifications: General • Extruded aluminum .125" wall thickness one piece square cylinder • Top open for up down lighting. P8797- 31 top cover lens recommended when unit is used outdoors Mounting • Wall mounted • Covers any standard outlet box • Cast mounting bracket supplied attachment of unit to wall with one almost invisible set screw Electrical • Medium base porcelain nickel plated brass screw shell socket Labeling • UL-CUL Wet location listed only when P8797-31 top cover is used • UL-CUL listed for indoor use without cover Rev. 8/99 www.progresslighting.com Progress Lighting Antique Bronze 2 Light Wall Lantern - P5644-20 at The Home Depot Progress Lighting Antique Bronze 2 Light Wall Lantern Model P5644-20 $156.06/Each This item does not quality for free shipping. Quantity.[ Or ire Only ® Add to My List 0 Add to My Registry View Larger Be the first to write a review. Write a review for a chance to win a $250 Gift Card. Learn More. At -*A Description 6 in. square cylinder with heavy duty aluminum construction and die cast wall bracket. Sleek design offers a superior low -profile option for lighting building exteriors. Features 2-light configuration which illuminates both up and down - creating a dramatic lighting effect. Powder coated finish. UL listed for wet locations. • Antique Bronze Finish • Metal Shade • 6 In. Width x 18 In. Height • Uses (2) 150-Watt BR-40 Bulbs • May use 250w Q PAR-38 lamp. • MFG Brand Name : Progress Lighting • MFG Model # : P5644-20 • MFG Part # : P5644-20 • Outdoor Lighting Application : Wall Specifications • ADA Compliant : No • Assembled Depth (In Inches) : 8.88 In. • Assembled Height (In Inches) : 18 In. • Assembled Weight (In LBS) : 7.35 • Assembled Width (In Inches) : 6 In. • Bulb Type : Incandescent • Energy Star Compliant : No • Hardwired or Plug -In : Hardwired • Height : 18.000 In. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFL ER A R C H I T E C T S LLC ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN May 21, 2009 City of Stillwater Community Development 216 North Fourth Street Stillwater MN 55082 P: 651-430-8820 Project: Third Street Office Building Project No.: 08-049 Re: Design Review Application Project Description The proposed project is a new one-story with a lower level walkout office building to be located at Third Street and Myrtle Street. The intent of the building is to provide a new location for the United States Postal Service office and five office condo spaces. Within walking distance from the new Stillwater Parking Ramp, the Third Street Office Building has been designed to fit perfectly into the existing neighborhood. It is proportional to the overall buildings within the area. The exterior design and materials have been selected to tie the building into the existing neighborhood and historic Downtown Stillwater design. Bricks selected for the project matches the water building and Teddy Bear Park building. The tower is designed to complement the City Hall tower. The Third Street Office Building has been designed with the intent of being the first L.E.E.D (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified building in Stillwater. A rain screen design has been incorporated to cool the building and allow vapor transmission. The building will consist of low volatile organic compounds materials (paint, carpet, adhesive, and others low flush toilets, tankless water heater or solar powered water heater, day lighting, bike racks and rainwater collection for outdoor sprinkling are a few examples of how green/sustainable design has been incorporated into the project. The Third Street Office Building will be constructed using mostly local sub -contractors. All windows will be Andersen Windows manufactured in Bayport. STILLWATER MN OFFICE 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T" STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 5 5❑ 4 2 P: 6 5 1- 3 5 1- 1 7 6❑ F: 6 5 1- 4 3❑-❑ 1 B❑ W W W. H A F A R C H I T E C T S. C❑ M Member of The American Institute of Architects M A D I S❑ N WI OFFICE 5008 LINDE LANE SUITE 300 DEFOREST, WI 5 3 5 3 2 P: 60B- B 4 6- 1 3❑❑ F: 60B- B 4 6- 7❑ 9 9 W W W. H A FA R C H I T E C T S. C❑M T° 41 THIRD STREET OFFICE BUILDING THIRD STREET & MYRTLE STREET STILLWATER, M I N N ES OTA ABBREVIATIONS P AB CNT Fo PAP PARALLEL AD ACOUSTICAL FE rum EXTINBUISHER PC PRECAST CONCRETE ACT ACOUSTICAL Tple pERIM PERIMETER AO, AO...TABLE FEE F'AINTZ Know pi_ KATE ElEvATION R.L. pRopEpri, LINE . s 'A : L171370.1: sr.: 7" MEI. E RE HosE EA 1NET FLAN KART. LAMINATE AP ACCESS PANEL FLUOR FLUORESGENT 1.„ POLISHEDIEDI ruTuRE spDARE Fool' 0EF. A RAGE EDT. FIREVALvECAE,RET ..AREREIR •EL BELOW pEpro pa LIR Tome ®ELKS ow PLYWOOD CM BEAM GLASS. GLAZING DT QUARRY TILE ERE GEODEa R OTTR EFRARTir EF GR,TIBH THERMAL EFM KRE. REFLEGTED.emrRr.n v REV REVISION. REVI MM HOLLOW METAL REF REFT.ENDE HR MOOR HT HEIGHT cHDD CHALKSOARD RED. REQUIRED MTG NEAT.. NH RICHT HAND C.1 CONTROL JOINT NW HOT wAIER E ivo RVRRAYLIG C. CLOEIET EER s C. CLOSURE EL. 1-0 INFORMATION co =REST T J iITEw Gw RUSEAREDEFT DEE. CC BHT GREET GRRR RR,EEFN.NNRRN. KCONC. 'C'D"'NCRETE .EFNRT BRIE EA„ITARY „APE. RECEPTACLE SPED GRR CONE OONFERENcE L IRocRouT STANDARDSTAINLESS STEE E STD T GLTw GGLRwA,ER LT. LIGHT ' vE THRoUGM MR LGEFVER TRILET EP DISPENSER DE. DEGREE., NT NAN mANDAL U V EFRINAL Dv. E L.A.,.NL v"""- wu.DovERiNC RRE,oR W ELEC. ELECTINGLAL) I. w000 T.R. %TMS...E ENG_ ENGINEER OA isvERALL WIN. WORKING POINT Ews ATER Do ouTRIDE ,ARETER Y P wELDEG WIRE PACING COOLER OONG OPENING . YARD EXP. EXPOSED OPP CIPPIONTX YR. YEAR EmERIOR LOCATION MAP ° w +5 gI `S,33 F 3� ii . '3 sJtd)tl; 13 i Tk db>-,wst,^ M: tax Y Fzd`z� � A -w4rce 5r. DIRECTORY OWNER ARCHITECT HAF ARCHITECTS, LLC 1 2445 55TH ST., SUITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 551342 CONTACT: MICHAEL G. HOEFLER PHONE: 651-351-176❑ FAX: 651-430-01 0❑ CODE DATA A. AppLIGAGLE sumo.. cuDes AMENDMENTS INCORPORATING THE FOLLOWING. BOOB INTERRATIONAL FIRE CODE EL BEIBmic ZONE C. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION D. CONOTRUCTION TYPE AcTuAL AREA D. ALLOWABLE NO. OF STORIER AsTuAL No. OF sToRIED PROJECT TEAM i y hu rch. ` AN ENERGY BUILDING COMPANY' l fi 1 R �•/ STll,l.q 1fF.P, MINN � J , I; 1 I. 1, 1 1 I 1': I) I \ \ I DRAWING INDEX DS. D D D D D D D D D r D -I_ z 0 A N N-. A A A A N 0 O A N N m m m m r 1 r m D D D D r D 1 1 m m m m , Z m Z I I I I o I m A A A A A r A 0 m m N rr I A A A A m r D m m m n m I P1 P1 P1 P1 Z m❑ El El i D E1 m r m [ 0 m 0 m m m m m r Z A A A A A A H D D D D 0 m r r r D r D r 1 ZI 1 1 ❑❑ D A A A A Z N 0000 A❑ Z m m m m . ZZZZ TA ZZZZ m ElD r ❑❑ m m li r z> A_ A_ A_ A Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 ISSUE RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLG I EA 5 55" STREET SuPTE A LAKEELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1760 FAX 651-420-01SO WWW.HAFARCHITECTO.COM jn• F:titJV 8° IICING C(1MIRN% MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OS-049 MMH MOH 5-15- 2009 TITLESHEET TO y, 46 3 SITE PLAN 0 \ 48.9 • 36" L EXISTINC „-- 'A:0 ‘'.• • A‘II • I \ 11 \ 1, \ 11` \ 11A1rr 4-,1/ \* , \ \ • , grrE PLAN NOTIM —EXCAVATION SUB-OONTRACTOR SHU. PROVIDE TiE FOLLOW** IN ADDITION TO THAT SHOWN ON TIE PLAN. A. SILT FENCE AS REWIRED Sr CITY CODE B. TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE. G. REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVE*ENT 4 CONC. CURB/SUTTER REPLACE*ENT AT AREAS OF DEMOLITION FOR UTILITY'S AND THE LIKE. 0.E. HOUSE DRIVIMAY-ETCJ D. PROVIDE 6' SAND CUSHION BENEATH FLOOR SLAB. S. PROVIDE 6' AGGREGATE BASE UNDER SIDEWALK. F. REGARDING OP TOPSOIL FOR FUTURE SLACK DIRT LANDSCAPE FINAL GRADE. 6. EXCAVATION 4 BACKFILL OP BUILDINS- HAIL our EXCESS, MATERIAL. H. CITY OF STILLWATER SERER 4 WATER PERMIT AS veu.. AS CITY OF STILLWATER RIGHTOF WAY PERMIT. I. ANY 4 ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL AT UTILITY AREAS. J. ANY SAW CUM* OF BON BITUMINOUS 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT. IC REMOVAL OF ANY BITUMINOUS 4 OR CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS 1151 AS CURE* L 6' X 4WET TAP OF EXIST. WATERMAIN. M. 4' Di?., CL. S2 PIPE. AWNS WITH 40° WV UNIFLANSE W2' °PENNS. N. DISCONNECT CORP. STOP AT MAIN. O. CONNECTION TO EXIST. SANITARY SEWER INSIDE RIK P. 4' PVC. SCH. 40 PIPE AS VEIL AS CLEAN -OUT. O. PROVIDE BACKFILL 4 COI -PACT UTILITY TRENCH WITH ON -SITE MATERIAL. R. TIE SANITARY SEER WATERMAIN SHALL EE INSTALLED INTO SRD STREET S. THE EXISTIN6 HOUSE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INVESTISATED AND ABANDONED. HAF ARCHITECTS HOSTLER ARCHITECTS LLEt 1 2 44 5 5 5 aTR EFT 8LIITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 RHON r 651-351-1160 FAX 65 1 -430•011110 WWW.HAFARUHITEOTS.CION PROJECT, TI-111.0 errptEe-r IDIL-0171 TH I DO.0 EA SYLVIDETI._ MI-11-1.-WATFO. MINN EISCITA, IDEIEI1131.4 IDEEIVIEVY HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WaB PREPARED BY PIE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVIRION AND THAT AM A OULY LICENSED ARCHITECT IMO. THE LAWB CIF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MOH 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE DEMONS SHOWN l.110 DEOCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL PRAWN., GRAPHICS, ANO MODELS THEREOF, ARE PROPRIMARY AMP CANNOT BE COPIED, DUPLICATED C.H.IXACI40/ EXPLOITED, IN WHOLE DP IN PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMIRSION OF HAP ARCHITECTB. THESE ARE AVAILABLE MIR LIMITED REVIEW ANC EVALUATION PE °DENTS. CONSULTANTB, OONTRAZTORR. ADENOIES, VENDORS AND Orrin POPODNNEL ONLY IN ACCOROANCE WITH THIS NOTICE 0 COPYRIGHT HAF ARCHITECTS 2.008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DEB ea IPTION SHEET INFORMATION: A2I RA L SITE PLAN AS 1 EL 150,0. v\-( -1.414 '"" g9•01. EXISTING, BUILDING Sl< )..AAND5OAPE KEY NOTES 1. CONCRETE STEPS WITH HAND RAILS 2. FACE BRICK RETAINING WAIL WITH CONCRETE GAP 5. LANDSCAPED AREA 4. CONCRETE SIDEWALK/PLAZA 5. FLAG POLE WITH LANDSCAPING 6. AREA WELL - SEE PLANS 7. ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER 6. CITY CONSTRUCTED PARKINS LOT 9. SLOPED SIDEWALK 10. SITE RETAININ6 WALL BLOCKS (ANCHOR STONE) II. CITY SIDEWALK 12. CITY CUR 15. EXISTING I-1/2 STORY HOME 14. LOADING DOCK AREA 15. TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA 16. 6' BLOCK WITH 4' PAGE BRICK 17. 6' CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 16. DUMPSTER 19. CITY CONSTRUCTED RETAINING WALL TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING, TYPES SM. SUGAR MAPLES (4) 65. &OLDEN SPIREA SHRUBS (LANDSCAPE AREAS) HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHIT£CTa LLD 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 T" a T R E E T a 11 I T E A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- 5 5 T- 1 7 6❑ FAX 851-420.0190 WWW. HAFAROH ITEOTa.00M TLE STILLWA ERR MINN ESOTA cuErrn I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION CR REPORT THAT I AM A OLILY LICENSED ARCHITECT LINDER THE LAMB OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 0a-049 MMH MOH 05/15/09 NET.. THE DESIGNS PHIS. AND DESCRIBE° INCI.°01.10 ALL TECHNICAL °RAMIRO. GRAPHS, AND MOCIELS THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT GS SOME. DUPLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPUOITED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF KOF ARCHITECTS. THEEE ARE AVAIUSLE FOR LIMITED SWIPE. AND EVALUATION SY SLIEST. SONSULTANTS. CONTRACTOR. A.N016. VENDORS AND CITICE PCROOHNDL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH VMS NOTICE. D COPYRIGHT HAF AliClirrECR BUD. Au. RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION a HEET INFORMATION: LANDSCAPE PLAN L1 NDSGAPE PLAN I'.2ao' 4 i ,—..„......,,,,.....-..,-...., N HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS Ll.t1 I 2 .4.4 5 5 5 T. ST R ET BC ITE A LAKE EL-14 0, MN 55045 PHONE 651-551-1760 FAX 65 1-4S0-121 HO WWW.HAFAREIHITE0T13.00M PROJECT: THIRD/ JEITI,IEET 1,IFP-110. PILIM•Ol TH I IRO Sa .1711—L-WATER. M1,1 I NI IMTA. IMEE111.11, IR.EVIEVV PHONE: ENIALIL, I HEREIN CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION DR Remo' WAD pRESARED SY NE OR LINDER MY OiltECT SUPERVISION Anna THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHIVED, LINCER THE uwe OF THE STATE or MINNESOTA. , • MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH ...FED ST MOH 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE DEGO. SHOWN ANO DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, ORAPNIOX ANO MODELS THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY ANO DANNOT BE CIOPIED, DUPLICATED DR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED, IN VAIOLE PART. WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF RAF ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION NY CLIENTS, CONSULTANTS. CONIT4.1.21, ASC.., VENDORS ANC MFR. miaow.. ON, IN ACCORDANCE WIN THIS NOTICE, m comm." HAFArtoirreCTe ZOOS. Atl. WORTS R.ERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 'NATION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 1 RGHITEGTURAL RENDERING, NOT TO SCALE ..",./ / , / /..,- r / ..- .7 i --/ ..-----4, •••••‘,z, , N wmPiamyy ,,H•••-• .4.-••••• ••••REP,E,,„, • . ........ •• • .--•••••• .531S72•-•-.• HAF ARCHITECTS H CIEFLER ARCHITECTS LL.O 12445 55T. STREET ELITE A 1-.AK1.14 CI, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351- / 760 FAX 65 1 -4210..0180 WWW. HAFARGIH ITECITEI. DON PROJECT: 'NH EITSLEET CIPPIOE EILIJI21 MYRTLE l_l_W/VEE R. NI I IN IN EMCITP, 0E131E11N REVIEW PHONE: 01,10•11.-: I HERE. CERTIFT THAT THIB PLAN, SPECIFICATION REPORT WAE PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVIBION AND THAT I AN A DULY LICENCE° ARCHITECT UNDER TILE LAMB OF MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 08-049 MMH MOH 05/1 5/09 REEL: THE DEBIGNE SHOWN ANO DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNI.L DRAWINGS, GRAPHIC, AND MODELS THEREOF, ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE COPIED, DUPLI.TED. VONNERCIALLY EXPLCWED, IN WHOLE UR IN PART, WITHOUT EXPRECIL WRITTEN PERNIESION OE MAP ARCNITECTB. THERE ARE AVAILABLE FYIR LIMITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION GE GLIENTe, CONEULTANTS, CONTRACTOR, Romin, YLWOR AND OEM. PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITN THIS NOTICE. 0 COPYRIGHT MAP ARCHHECTIL 213.. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEETlARAL RENDERING AR 2 RGHITEGTURAL REM:ERIN& NOT TO SCALE -i. ..., j 77. 4-- .71.4;EI7.7;: HAF ARCHITECTS HOECLER ARCHITECTS LLD I 2445 5 5.r" STREET SUITE A LAKE ELM EI, MN 55 042 AN N E 651-351-1760 FAX 551-42D0t8U WWW.HAEARI3H ITEUTE1.130M PROJECT. EITIREET !OFFICE EIL_IOG -1-H MYR-1-,E SIT11-1—MM,TER. M I NOV ESIEITA, DESIEINI REVIEW I HEREBY CERT,' THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR RERORT THAT I Am A DuLy Lice... ARCHITECT uNDER THE UWE! OF MINNESOTA, ottiffs, MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 08-049 MM H MGH 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE DEMO'S SHOWN ANC OsScRIBEO HEILER iNcLUDING ALL TEEHNICAL DRAWINOW ERR..., Aro moDELS TRERECIF, ARE paCERIETART AND CAMEO SE Compo, DURLICATED OR COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED. IN WHOLE OR Iry RART, WOWS, EERREM WRITTEN FERMISSION oF HAF AREHITECTE THESE ARE AVAMSLF FOR LIMITED HEVER AND EvALuATioll ey CLIENTS, CONSULTANT'', coNTRACTCR, AGENCIES. VOW.. AND OFFICE FEROONNEL CINLy IN ACCORDANCE WIT, 7,19 NOTICE CE1177RICM. RAF AREHITEETS 2CILIS. ALL ROHE. RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 3 RGHITEG1VRAL RENDERING NOT TO SCALE -1•427fT2t4-2-___, l' \ .......,., -, oe...--_,...... ., ...... ..., ..... . ./ , ..... -`,. . . :.;.,,,-.--.- ' - - -,..---?'-' --"..."A• 1 4 r HAF ARCHITECTS T-ILIEFLEC ARCHITECTS LI-D 1 2 445 55.r. STREET SLITS A LAKE EL -MO, MN 550422 PHONE 65 1 -2i5 T -1 760 FAX 65 1 -42[2-0 IBC WWW.HAFARGHITECITE1.00M PROJECT: THIRIO EPTREET: IRLOPOI THIRD Sp MYRTLE STI 1-1-WATER, MORIN ESP IMTA. In.alorq REVI EW PHONE: FAX: NAPERY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED EY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANS THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT NADER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER KolerrrunaN 24210 013-049 MMH MGH DA 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED SEREIN INOLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS. TIRAPRICS. AND Krone THEP., ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT ISS COPIED. DUPLICATED OR CONMERLIALLY EXPLOITED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. WITHOUT EAPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MAP. ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE FOR UNITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION AV CLIENTS. DONSULTANTS, DONTRACTLIRS, AGENDIES, vs... AND OFFICE PCPSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE wrrH nais p Ass., ARCPRECPS 20138. ALL NISHTS SESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING AR 4 RGHITECTURAL WERINIS Nor TO WALE PROPERTY LINE TOP OF PIO S T01W ,/ , P R O►! R T Y L I N G TOP tr IS. 140w // /////////////r//.%// Y mama FLOOR ELMS ATOP Y OF COITAG= 0MO 1RLL - 0R MOONS FOR DOTAle ///////i r II /III r/// / -"AA- // // ///// ///// ///// TOP ' QFALL %// // S 707,4Y / 0N0 ROOD POETS ATOP 4,O%4,0 PAD P201140 //// // //U, W///nDo% i' !1 HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLD 12445 55T. STREET SLITS A LAKE ELMD, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 651-420. 9110 WWW.HAFAROH ITEQTH. 00M I RAM STREET L !MYRTLE o� STILLWATERR MINNES OTA I HERREN CERTIF./ THAT T„IS PUN, SPECIFICATION DR REPO. Tmai I AN A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT LINDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, • MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ 06-049 MMH MGH ❑ 5/ 1 5/0 9 NOTICE: -ME DESISTS. SHOWN AND °MORISSE, HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPHITE, AND MODELS "(NERCO, ARE PROPRIETARY ANC .NNOT PIE COPIED, DUPLICATE° COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITED, IN WHOLE PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERHIBSION CIF MAF ARCHITECT. THERE ARC AVAILABLE FOR UNITED REVIEW AND EVALUATION BY °LIEN, CONSULTANTS, CONTRACTORS, MENGES, Wrvoom AND CIFFIOL PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NO/ICC, COIMRIGHT HAP ARCHITECTS 2LIDEL ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION: FOUNDATION PLAN Al 00,0' 01.0 41.0 000 2 • 0 OCupOci.900 A—/ / / / / / / / / / / / -77-77=77-7-7 / / / / 7dr L _ 7 7 -,p7r j L _ _ 4, / 2 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 7 -fyr, r- I L L _ _ / / / / A454 PILL PD. / / / / / / / / / / /7/ / / / Lr; MECH. ROOM la § jD.• /' it ,CP //// ///7-/ / / / o. t L _ L _ _ x _J // • 12 IIIII.170100011004 / / / / • . &OR 00141 620 11.141,04 • . . . .. • . • • //^///////// 11. 144,0' • 0 / / / /• z z • HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLD 1 2445 5 5.'“ STREET S UITE A LAKE ELMO, MN 55045 PHONE 651 -351- t Tao FAX 65 1 -420.0 1 14 0 WWW.HAFAREIHITEOTH.LICIM PROJECT: THIEL° STREET OFFICE BLOM TH IRO S. NITIRTL E STILLWATER. MINNESOTA DEM I N REVI EW PHONE: RANT P IPPO, I HEE. CERTIFY THAT THIS PL.. SPECICICATEN REPO. WAS PREPARED SY ME MR LEDER MY DIRECT SUPER... AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT ONCER THE LAWS OF THC OF ml•Neecrrn. MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421 0 08-049 MMH MOH 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE D.E. SHOWN AND 0E6.113E0 HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPHICB, AND MODELS THEREOF,. PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT SE DOMED, CEPLICAT. OP COMMERCIAL, CEPLOITED, IN WHOLE UR IN PART, WITHOUT OCHRE. WRI.EN PERMISSION HAP ARCHITECT. THESE ARE AVAILABLE As UNIT. REVIEW ANC EVALUATION in' CLIENTS, CIONCRATTCRE, AGENCIES, VENDORS AND OPRICIL P.SONNEL ON, IN ACCORLIANCE WITH .18 MCHICE. COPYRIONT RAF AEHATEEs CMS ALL HEN. RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INFORMATION! LOWER LEVEL PLAN A2 WER LEVEL PLAN 9/32' •IL 2 oacc000coacc000 000( X)000 vz—LANDISGAPN AREA 0 w. 0:41.5112150TABISI ..•••"•• / / / / / / / / / / NO' KEAPIELL 521. 519i /1111PAPPALIWOVIS • •G6tiGn5TE61.05 • ANDSGAPB A INT COMPETE 5TAY5 74. 140 ALUM. FRANC 1 MRCP 1 1147 • 74" 11047 74. ‘01 747 !PO 447 riwnre I FOR ,• / / / // / *47 ( . • . 0 • 11 / / / / / LIXIIR LIND. PLA/4-2'' " . • . ,• ...• • . • . • ///i/i.i//z/ WV' • 0 0 / k 2 kk • 0 HAF ARCHITECTS HOE7LER ARCHITECTS LLD 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 STREET a u r A LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-2151-1760 FAX 651-420.015O WWW.HAFAROHITEOTB.CIOM PROJECT: THIRCI 6TREET !OFFICE BLOIS 11-111RIC R. MYRTLE STILLWATER, NI NI ES OTAL FIENIIELS PHONE: PAX: EMAIL! I HEREBY DERV, TWAT THIS PLEA. SPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR LINDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AN A DULY LICENSED AROMITECT UNDER THE SAWS OF THE TTTTT OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 OB-049 MMH MOH 05/15/09 NOTICE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRIRED HEREIN INCLLIDIHO ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPNICS. AND MODELS THEREOF, ARE PROPRIETARY AND CANNOT BE COPIED, DUPLICATED OR ELIMMERCMLLY EVPLOITED, IN WHOLE CR IN PART. INDHOLIT EXPRESS WRITIVS PERMISSION OF NAF ARCHITECTR THERE ARE AVNIASLE FOR LIMITED REVIEW AND ESN -CATION SY oLiewre. CONSULTANTS. CONTRACTORS. AMON., VENDORS AND CROCE PEREONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE. ET CORNY., HS ARCHITECTS BOOB. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MAIN LEVEL PLAN A3 AIN LEVEL PLAN 5/92'sr-O• I— • 124' 0 err OPEN TO @LON� O01107RA-TION - 61 S NWO PAIL-' TOWER 0 `HEADS • IP!A vOPEN TO 6111O61--1 7 SLOPE, SLAD1111 666 81511011111 vIUT HOOP SOLO. O HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS LLC 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 'R STREET SUITE A LAKE ELMC, MN 5.5042 PHONE 651 -251 - 196C FAX 85 1 -420-C 1 E0 WWW. HAFARCH ITEOTB. 00M ICE EILCIOI THIREa D STI LLWATER.MYRTLE MINN E9 OTA I HEREBY CERTI, THAT TNE PLAN, BPECIFICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED NY ME DP UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVIRION AND OPAT I AM A CULT LICENSED ARCHITECT UNCER THE LAWN ar THE BETTE OF MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑9-049 MMH MOH ❑ 5/ 1 5/09 NOTICE: THE NESIONS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED. HEREIN INCLUDE,. ALL TECHNICAL DRAWINEM, ISRAPNICIS. AND MODELS THERESE, ARE PROPRIETEMT AND EANNOT BE COPIED. DUPLICATED CIP COMMERCIAL, EXPLOITED, IN WHOLE CR IN PART, WHHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF NAT ARCHITECTS. THESE PRE AVAILABLE FOR LINHED RTXNEW AND AOMPOILLI, VENDORS AND OFFICE PERSONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE. COPYRIGHT HAF ARCHITECTS 20[18. ALL RIENTS RESERVED ISSUE Dare DESCRIPTION SHEET L❑FT INFORPLMAATINON: A4 PLAN 0 Q z rc 0 '(I a 0 0 I f I n f ❑ 5/ 1 5/09 0 0 3 to N a) 3NI1Al113dOMd swam IIO117116,oa1YG 10O414L-NOIL79i main' II II II IIIIII III IIIII111111111 �„ ■II�,, ��III`IIIIIIIIIIIIII •O'''I II illilillllII IIr I u b L EXTERIOR ELEVATION - KEY NOTE LEGEND I. 1400144411 PACE ERICc STE 2 PREP* IOW NITN CONCAVE JOIST 2.WA O . WA 4. Y LR®TC! ROC PACE EGO! OM E. MIN SCREEN PANES MN OPEN .ICAO COLOR TO OE N6.CTS PREPINSISO M1ML PATOIA 1. In' COMFIER! PANEL SOTS O N W ® META. STARTER REM/ ROOF PANELS ION NA►N SPK,ES 1141/4' 02. W114 A2ROCIAIES RMNINR 4 7101 A 4,7 +0.. ITOby Y 7O.. Ifi P Err' N.. IO,' 1-VA "Au- 10042. m ARISIS011 CLM ARCWIE TIW4. MOON • SCALE 10. ANDO= AIJMINM 1114011111940124 _ WE OOISOIL! II. /TOOL REAM CANOPY WPM WT 4 TE44000 4 ORACIREW 0Q EROTICNS 4 OVALS L. MIN SCRIM PAWL JOINT. TYPICAL IS. DAMP LINE INDICATES WNOC! LOCATES MAN fr P1L 14. CAW N PLACE COW,RII wars DJNIEO IOC NOIATIN CONORI! FOOTING - OQ FOROATION RAN 10. COWMEN PANEL MONA It WARNE WALL AMC! 01EIC0 N PORNYA►0 OR MCKMOINO lb. SIEN. PIPE PART TAIL I OR HANDRAIL INN ■■N ow' INN 0 INN ■■■ NIP 111111111 1111 1111111111 111111111111 ■ R APPROXIMATE ORD CROW MAC®. 000TALK 20.!RICK COMM WARIO. 110174V EL PRONE SILL OO. POCK °OUTER COURSE 22 MOPOR S162 RTANNR MOLL 24. AMRDJ% S1RSf !NATION OL STEM PP! IWRIWL y. PATTO 21. ELOPES L4144942 LW000AP! RAY 20. TOR. 1000CR MVO ELL ROCOACE OMC4IE MASONRY • wluuu ULI M ■EM ■■I■ m MEM 0 1111111111111..1. ■ 11 1 ■■■■ 1111 TO. PACE NECKW4600Y CONTROL JONT N. OCI®I MALL CAP COW.. PRETO0m MLTAL FLAMER ELOPES OAK 1RATOD MOO NOCKSN NL IMES MALL CQIOT. PACE N11CK AIR SPACE VOM TA OTTY OP 41ILLPLATER CONCUR CUD Elf ORE M O.A CITY OF WILLM1Ot 6.K/4TOP RV 011E10) PV CONCAVE ELM WORMS FINNSTO MANMYAY ere LOAM. ARAI ELOPE FLOOR M. VW OF SSLLMTOI RETARDS MALL A. STORM LIS4TN11S OCONEE OR EXTERIOR !LADE NM III. III! i ElIGKO'• $ elMe x EL HAF ARCHITECTS HOECLER ARCHITECTS LL.Q 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 " S T R E ET SUITE A LAKE EL.MD, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 1- 1 16 ❑ FAX 55 1 -400 0-0 1 SD WWW. HAFARDHITEUTS.D OM MYRTLETI-11R0 STREET OFFICE SLOE, TI-I IRO Sy STILLWA ERMINNESOTA CLMNT I HEREBY OERTI. THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIPICATION CR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT ONO. THE LAWS DP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 24210 ❑E1-044 MMH MOH 05/1 5/09 NRYICC THE DESIDNE, SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDINSI ALL TEOHNICAL DRAWINGS, GRAPHICS. AND MOCELS THERE, ARE PROPRIETARY .D CANNOT ec COPIED, DUPLICATED COMMERCIALLY ExPLOITED, IN WHOLE PART, WITHOUT EN,FREDB WRITTEN PERMISSION OP HAP ARCH,ECTB. THE. ARE AVAILABLE FOR LIMITED REVIEW AND NUNN= VENDOR. AND cm= PERSONNCL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE. DOPYRISHT HAP ARCHITECTS 101313. ALA RISHTS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 9ELNEETEVATIOINFORMATIONN: A9 ATION 4or119t-P — +E_ W4 USPW.L 00 . w 2 _1 LSTIL MEDdV OPEE142110 021 OP CANOPY }� �1L�7%6� F E. 14 O 1— C EXTERIOR ELEVATION — KEY NOTE LEGEND I. MOSIIM PAGE IIYMR PI114 NV RUNNELS D010 P411 CONCAVE JOINTS O. WA IS. WA 4. r 12.111120NE 110c1 AGE WO GAP S. RAN SOWN T Ad60 WIN OPEN JOINTS COLOR TO BE ffiEGTED 6, MQINIE0 PETAL PAELLA 1, IA1' COMPOSITE PANG SOPRT R PSE9WNE7 METAL STM0M SEW POOP PATES PITH SENO EPROM mew OG NTH ASSOCIATED MAOIS 6 4 TRIM _IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL_ IIIIIIIIIIII Num N 6O4 4. AMJETION GLAD ARONIECTNAL REPOS - 71275mILE ANOaEO AIASINN aaBERGNT - SEE 10IENLE IL STEEL BEAN CANOPY WREN P1111 TMGOS 4 SMOKES EIS lQ ammo 4 0E1ASS I1 RAN 111261161 PANS JOST - 11FlGAL E DA1IE2 LIRE INDICATED 11I10p'm LOCATED P1TNN 441016E 14 GAST IN PL AGE GOICAER STEPS E, PAWED LES 101U1BE C.ONGEIE MOTIVE - a PONOATION PLAN 4 GOM M =E PATE. PASGA A. RETAINS* PALL (PACE SRJGQ M POREER010 4 OR1KX6ROID N, VEIL PPE MUAIm NAL 4 OR NATDRA0 a Ian .IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII M 0 0 M. APPI104EMTE SM EVENT IMAMS 1 SOOrWC 20. AUGIG GOMI / STARTS 10.. vine 21 TROTS ELL 02 OPER SOLDER GORY! b, NOWA S10T! WAHINE MALL OM. MP/10X VIEW ENATON RE. OTE L PPE 11A/ORA0 26. PATIO 71. SLOPED LAg4SBE LAADSGAPE PLAN 20. COWL OOOLIOIR STEPS 24. ROCS:T 0E GONGIETE MAORIS' SD. PK1 MOKMM0RY 2211112L JOST SI. 1G10l1 MU. GAP CONK. - MO9NIEm tam. PLASHES ELOPED OVER TREATED MOOD EIOGCIV BE. SCRIM PALL COAST. PALE ERIGM MR 51445E 6 C.l11 SE GI1Y OP SE.U'ATER GOICREIS QRE ET O HINSi 04. arty 04 STILLANTER 51AGKTOP EC ORME OR V CO11GE1! ELM P4SROOM ram SLOPE name TO GRAN AWAY ITO IDIOM A1EN SS. CRT OP SMYAM1OI METAMP PALL 57. O11E410R LEWIS SCONCE EL 00ESM!LAVE OM TOTOP,S4OPM:ALILLMOOR POOTINSS el HAF ARCHITECTS HOZFLER ARCHITECTS LLB 12445 55T" STREET 11111,T2 A LAKE ELM O, MN 55042 PHONE 6 5 1- a 5 1- 1 7 6 0 FAX 551-420-0150 WWW. HAFAR OH I TEOTS. D0M THIRD 13,1,1E1E,- THS. MYRTLE IRD FFICE aLoo BTI LI-WATER, MIN N MODITA I HERESY CERT,. THAT THIS PLAN. EPECHICATION REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANII THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER 114E LAWS OE THE erwrc Of MINNECIOTA. MICHAEL HOEFLER 2421❑ 06-049 MMH ammo M G H 0 5/ 1 5/09 NOTIRE: THE DESIGNS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREIN INCLUDING ALL TECHNICAL IONAWIN38, GRAPHIC, AND MODELS THERM, ARE PROPPIETAPY ANS CANNOT BE CONE, DUPLICATED CP COMMERCIALLY DEPLO11,0, IN WHOLE CR IN PART, WITHOUT EXPRESS WRI-rTER PERMISSION ar HAS ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AVAILABLE MR LIMITED REWEW AND EVALUATION BY CLIENTS. DONSULTANTS. COMIDACTORB. ACENOIE, VENDER, AND OFFICE PLUMS. ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE. COPYRICHT HAP ARCHITECTS TOSE ALL WHITS RESERVED ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION !SHEET INFORMATION. ELEVATI O N A10 ATION 9�s••r-o• EXTERIOR ELEVATION — KEY NOTE LEGEND I. SOMA" PACE OIIBK PITH V2• IOHIIL BOND NMN CONCAVE JOINTS 2 WA S. WA 4.2 UN:S'O! ROGIO•KE E062 CAP RAIN WEER PMa6 WNN OPTS .DINTS COLOR TO ME mama 6. PRNPIINI® FETAL MEGA 7. lir GOMC6II! PAWL WPM 6. PRENNN® PLTAL HMDINI SSW MOP PAWS WIN SEMO SPACED 17411/4 OG WW ASSOCIATED PLASM"! I TRIM Yli. 114R4' 4. MLGRSOI CLAD IKAtl1 01.10E TWOS - a SCI88LE IO. AN0012•0 AWNINAI S'QQROR- eet 006LL2 IL 61E . SSW CANOPY SYSTEM PITH T6410121 4 BRACKETS a 6E01016 N VITALS 12IWN 1G<ED4 PANEL JOIN' - TYPICAL W. DARNED LINT INDICATES 111201EI LOCATED WW2 12111411I. 14. CAST N PLAGE CONCEPT! STEPS 12 PAWED UN: somas COIC.W:I! 1.001111111. SEE PONOMION PLAN 16. COMPOSITE PAW. MICA 17. RETAINER NAIL. RAG! SRCW IN NORE102118 R OR 100011210 12. STEM. PP! WARD RAILS AR HANDRAIL. M. APPROXIMATE END STREW IRADEs 1611220 lL 20. ERICK GOW N6 HAMS • d 1E1W 2L arose SET. 22. BRICK SOWERCCINRE 22 ANCHOR STONE RETAINER WALL 24. AMOK 67111127 PLEVATION 21. 6121 PIPE 148888E 26. PATIO 21. 6lOPED LAW419/10 LM PGAIS RAN 26. CON0 011151102 IMPS 24IauaACE CONGEST! MASONS( SOW -- II IITe_ MUM 1= &IIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111 II.. A CJ S0. PACE SRCKA4AEONRY CONTROL JOIN' SI. SLI®I POLL CAP CONK. - PRQIREIED FETAL PIA0410 ELOPED OVER 11110712.1200 ELOCKME ED. WREN MALL COME'. PAGE ERI :K • !PAM acw ES. CI Y GP 67E111A1ER 0210101! CANS ID'' O110116.1 S4. CiTY GP 6TMYMTNR BA/MCP 0E(OTI884.) ES. Et CONCAVE SLAB WUEROOM WISH SLOPE ROAR TO ORAN A MY (to LOAMY 41I1104 SS. CITY OF STILLWMTER RHNNN6 WALL H. IXIORIOR U6NtN11 SCONCE EE 2471220A ELAOE SNN EST' le 10041,1 Sf00'-3ri9M'-07 fb- Q HAF ARCHITECTS HOEFLER ARCHITECTS L1.Q 1 2 4 4 5 55T. S T R E E T au ITT[ A LAKE ELMO. MN 55042 PHONE 651-251-1T60 FAX 551-42U-01E10 WWW.HAFARUH ITEETS. 00M ▪ MEI as S TI L-WA.TER, MINI, Es oTn OEEIION REVIEW I HEREBY CERN, THAT THIS P.N. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAR PREPARED 1ST ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPENPASION AND THAT I AM A OE. LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS THE STATE OF MINNEROTA. MIOHAEL HOEFLER R.IRTRATION NO. 24210 08-049 DRAWN By MMH MOH 05/ 1 5/09 NEILL.. A, TECHNICAL DRAWN., SRAPHICS. AND MODELS THEREOF. ARE PROPRIETARY ANO CANNOT SE DOPIED. DUPLICATED COMMERCIALLY EXPIRITED. IN WHOLE DR IN PART. WITHOUT .PRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF MAE ARCHITECTS. THESE ARE AYARARLE FON UMW. REVIEW AND EVALUATION BY CLIENTS, DONRULTANTS. DONSIAIRO., ACIENDIRS, VORDORII AND OFFICE PerniONNEL ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH N. NOTICE. ISSUE CArE OEECRIPTION BNEET INFORMATIEIN: EXTERI❑R ELEVATION All OR ELEVATION 3/32••IL0• Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 28, 2009 CASE NO.: 09-24 APPLICANT: Paul Williquett, DQ PROPERTY OWNER: Greg Gartner REQUEST: Design Review of proposed projection sign for DQ LOCATION: 132 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: June 1, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner [M/r DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for DQ along Chestnut Street at 132 Main St S. The proposed sign face is in two parts and includes a 21" by 30" DQ logo and an 8" by 30" arrow for a total of 5.96 square feet. For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows one sign per street frontage. The site has frontage along both Main Street and Chestnut Street. The current sign along Main Street will remain unchanged. Additionally, the zoning ordinance allows projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. The total sign of the sign face is 6 square feet meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 214 Main St N Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Approval as conditioned. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. The bottom of the project must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk. 3. Except for the existing wall sign along Main Street, no additional signage is permitted. FINDINGS The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual. attachments: Applicant's Form Drawing/photo of the proposed sign Case No: 1) Date Filed: Receipt No.: Fee: $25.00 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials is required. After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. All following information is required . PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 15 MaiPN 4.5 Assessor's Parcel No. d e030d O /l?1)c2 (, Zoning District < (3 b Description of Project in detail VJ A't, (i i A C-0 i r i m i r tid- t c. 17 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in al/ respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and coned: I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required. Property Owner 61e- 4y. Representative Mailing Address o3).0 h. 3/, Mailing Address .,5S a ! c : gee : C City State Zip 5f i/fi r 'y flvs ,55z;g.i. City State Zip/440 5'©n, / r 54/i Telephone No. 6).S^/ — 3S7 77 c)C Telephone No. 6J1 28 --33 3 7 S:\Planni \d review ermit.w P Pd April 12, 2002 Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 29, 2009 APPLICANT: Mark Hanson CASE NO.: 09-26 REQUEST: Design Review of proposed "Tuscan Style" outdoor patio LOCATION: 239 Main St S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CC - Community Commercial ZONING: CBD - Central Business District HPC DATE: June 1, 2008 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planne DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review and approval of a new patio area for Marx Wine Bar & Grill along Water Street. The site is located in the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National Registry of Historic Districts. The building itself is a non-contributing building to the Historic District. This project involves the construction of an eight -foot wall with the development of a courtyard for 24 seats. The wall would be primarily stucco with brick accents. The entryway facing Water Street and the opening within the wall would have iron grilles. The proposed style (Tuscan) is not in keeping with the design guidelines and the period of influence the City aims to protect in Downtown Stillwater. The applicant should consider the use of materials that are more in keeping with the character established in Downtown Stillwater. Where this individual site may not be a contributing building, adjacent sites such as the Freight House, which is individually listed on the National Register, and the adjacent Simonet's building, which is a contributing building in the Downtown National Register, could be impacted by this change. 241 Main Street S Page 2 ALTERNATIVES The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options: 1. Approve the requests in whole or in part. 2. Deny the requests. 3. Continue the request for more information. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is July 13, 2009 and the next Heritage Preservation Commission meeting is scheduled for July 6, 2009. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the requested design review permit. CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL If the Commission chooses to approve the project, staff would recommend the following conditions of approval: 1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission. 2. Detailed lighting fixture specifications must be submitted for review by City Staff before installation. Shielded light fixtures shall be used with appropriate wattage of light bulbs to be approved by City Staff. 3. A new full curb shall be installed on Water Street along this site. The sidewalk shall be modified to accommodate the new curb. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, final plans for the curb and sidewalk must be submitted to, reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 4. An ADA accessible corridor shall be established between the end of the ramp off of the raised pedestrian sidewalk and the sidewalk along the east of this site. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, final plans for the ADA accessible corridor shall be reviewed by and approved by the City Engineer. 5. The trash dumpser shall be enclosed and screen as required by the design guidelines. If the trash enclosure is to be located on a parking space then a lease shall be obtained from the City prior to locating the enclosure on City Property. 6. The applicant shall receive all appropriate Washington County Health Department approvals. 7. The applicant shall submit a SAC determination letter prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. The application shall submit plans for the wall certified by a structural engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. The applicant shall receive Fire Department approval of any fire pit on the site. attachments: Applicant's Form and packet T EE 7. it Ai* Be_te (Ailartd bt s.)4.0-v7 C-c) Tiac Po- Ce-NITE/2_1Lec J 1AI3t or PPrT1 0 Jy 11 ve, 4 (-) z 0 m -0 (f) m -0 z 13]e1lS NIVIAI 8' — 0" z a z 2J EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ALLEYWAY 0 0 0 73 —9 z0E1 (—) (—) D7OtJi 7 E7O z— 3> D f-- Z 01 48 FEET tz:1 Z 77.1 7-1 X gr" • .41 70 m >11VC1\3CEIS C-) El X C --1 rrl A 1111111111111 (/) >I-1VM3C[IS Fri 70 70 m rn - --1 o DWG. ISSUE DATE: .0JeCT NO.1 $ t i II w o I e , M in n e s o t o EXTERIOR COURTYARD MARX WINE 241 S. MAIN STILLWATER for: Street MINNESOTA . C011313.11011 OM.. MM. EY . ARC.E07 Mt 11(1..1.0 Or SM. WALL MO NO1 6.00.. M.. SKINI.T1,.. rINIM.0 liff ...E MC1.C, COM4,01, Pt M. ON „or.,...m.,.. fet.C1 11, 0.1. WNW DATA ofavar BY: JO CHECKED DA We MARK DATE INIT. DESCRIPTION REV. BALAY marka Raley. RA .......N A DATA Igt/Iteier. a ARCHITECTS MN 81082 5 Tel: (831) 930-4812 CAE Om) ov-zoes 1 Indiana polialndiona Heritage Preservation Commission DATE: May 28, 2009 APPLICANT: Marc Putman CASE NO.: 09-04 REQUEST: Design Review of an amendment to the Liberty Village PUD for Architectural Review & Design Guidelines. LOCATION: Commercial area at the intersection of Manning Ave and CSAH 12 (Myrtle St/76th St W) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: CN - Neighborhood Commercial ZONING: VC - Village Commercial HPC DATE: June 1, 2009 REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plannef. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting design review approval of Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village. The request is two parts; first, this request officially adopts the design guidelines for the Liberty Village commercial area, which were inadvertently not adopted by the City. Second, it revises the sign and graphics section of the original guidelines and adds several new types of signs that can be used within the development. SPECIFIC REQUESTS The applicant is requesting design review approval for the Liberty Village Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village. In addition to design review approval by the Heritage Preservation Commission, the applicant will need approval from the Planning Commission and City Council of an amendment to the Liberty Village PUD. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 2 EVALUATION OF REQUEST The original Architectural Review and Design Guidelines for Liberty Village took years to develop after numerous meetings. When the PUD was officially approved by the City, the final Architectural Review and Design Guidelines were not included in that approval and subsequently were never adopted by the City. The original Architectural Review and Design Guidelines are appropriate and raise no concerns for staff. A number of revisions are proposed in the area of signage. The January 24, 2003 draft Architectural Review and Design Guidelines was 22 pages and the proposal before the Commission is now 39 pages with the bulk of the changes in the area of signage. The following are highlights on changes that are proposed: Branding Plans to incorporate a uniform marketing theme for the development No comment Master signs Up to four "master signs" (with two along Manning and two along CSAH 12). Allows 75 sq ft of signage up to 20 feet in height. BP allows up to 100 sf of signage with a height of 25 feet along Highway 36, 20 feet along County 5 & Greeley, and 6 feet in all other location. CBD and CA allows up to 30 sq ft up to 6 feet tall. Freestanding project monument signs Up to two freestanding project monument signs (three possible locations shown in the guidelines). Allowed to be 25 feet tall up to 100 sq ft in size. Other project development signs have been limited to six feet tall and 100 sq ft in size. City code would allow only one sign for this site. Light pole banners and bracket signs Allows the Liberty Village brand to be incorporated on light poles with banners and bracket signs City permits general banners to be installed on light poles in the CBD. Residential area has raised concerns with placing signs on light poles along residential areas. Building directory signs Allows up to a 12 sq ft directory signs, either attached or freestanding. BP district permits four sq ft for building/project name and one sq ft for each business. Wall signs Allows 1 sq ft for each linear foot of building. Sign area measured around letter + 3 inch margin. Cannot be higher than the parapet or 20 feet, whichever is lower. When combined with roof signage, this would provide twice as much building signage then what is permitted in any other district. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 3 Roof signs Allows 1 sq ft for each linear foot of building. Sign area measured around letter + 3 inch margin. Cannot be higher than the parapet or 20 feet, whichever is lower. Roof signs are currently prohibited by City Code. This would set a new precedence. Additionally, when combined with wall signage, this would provide twice as much building signage then what is permitted in any other district. Portable Sign Permitted Portable signs are prohibited by City Code. Temporary Banners Permits up to 4 per year for 90 days each. Applicant's proposal allows temporary banner to be displayed for up to 360 days per year. City code currently allows for 3 per year for 30 days each for a total of 90 days per year. Sandwich Boards Permits sidewalk signs and follows the Downtown Sidewalk Sign Policy No comment In staff's opinion, the request has the potential to "over sign" the development. The proposal before the commission is more liberal than what the City permits for signage in the BP zoning district, which is the City's most liberal sign criteria. As a neighborhood destination shopping area, this would seem a little extreme. Certainly a case can be made for additional signage along Manning and CSAH 12; however, it seems appropriate to have signage for this development fall somewhere between the City's standard for business park signage and neighborhood commercial signage. The proposal provides no cap and would allow business to have a building sign, projecting sign, free standing sign, projecting sign, and banner. Reasonable limits should be included in the proposal to keep this site on par with other commercial districts in the City. Finally, the proposal attempts to address each and every sign type within the City. The proposal should be limit to traditional permanent building sign and specific exceptions to other type of signage. Signs such as political, address, construction, real estate, rummage sale, and other similar type of sign should simply default to the general sign regulations that are in place for the entire City. Liberty Village Design Guidelines Page 4 ALTERNATIVES The Commission has several alternatives that can be considered: A. Approval. If the proposed guidelines are found acceptable to the HPC, then the requested design review should be approved, with the condition that the necessary PUD amendments are approved by the City Council or the design review approval would become void. B. Denial. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not acceptable, the request should be denied. C. Approval in part. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the request could be tabled until the July 6, 2009 meeting. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is July 13, 2009. RECOMMENDATION As presented, staff recommends that the Heritage Preservation Commission deny the design review for the requested PUD amendment. attachments: Applicant's materials Proposed Design Guidelines DESIGN REV E APP. CATION FORM COMMUNITY EVELOP T DEPARTMENT CITY OF STILLWATER 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET STILLWATER, MN 55082 Case No: V Date Filed: Receipt No.: , Fee: $25.00 The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting aterial submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of intent is required Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required. All following information is required . Address of Project Zoning District Description of Project in detail PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 15 Assessor's Parcel No. '7 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, inform, tion and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used" If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is requires Property Owner Y" Representative , Mailing Address Mailing Address City State Zip City State Zip Telephone No. Telephone No. Signature Signature (Required) H:\rncnamara\sheila\2005\design review permit.wpd July 1.3, 2005 (Required) Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for ,440 =R, LIBERTY VILLAGE AT Stillwaters New Small Town Neighborhood. January 24, 2003 DRAFT For: The Architectural Control Committee; Homer Tompkins-CPDC, Paula Kroning-for Newman Realty Partnership Ey: Putman Planning and Design / Development Directions Inc, Tomten Environmental Design Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for : Liberty on the Lake master site plan. LIBERTY VILLAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Goals 3. Objectives 4. Approval Background 5. Building placement and site considerations 6. Building Massing 7. Building Fronts 8. Building height 9. Roof design 10. Franchise Architecture 11. Building Materials 12. Detailing 13. Screening of rooftop equipment 14. Utility areas 15. Lighting 16. Signs and Graphics 17. Awnings 18. Colors 19. Parking 20. Bicycle parking 21. Streetscape elements 22. Landscaping 23. Management Concept Liberty Village Site Plan provided in previous master plan and park design city submit- tals. Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION Liberty Village general development plan showing revised road and parking alignments request- ed by city staff. Liberty Village consists of approximately 7 acres, in the northwest corner of Liberty on the Lake, Stillwater Minnesota. The following design guidelines and per- formance standards shall be observed, in addition to the requirements as applied and approved under a Planned Unit Development for Liberty Village, under the Village Commercial District Ordinance Number 830. It is the aim of these guidelines to maintain quality site planning, architectural design, landscape architectural design and construction in adherence with the Liberty on the Lake Master Plan and selected design theme. The Architectural Design Committee shall use these guides to evaluate specific commercial site and building positions. 2. GOALS •Create a high quality "country village" consisting of neighborhood services and convenience services for commuters using residential scale structures. •Create as a gathering and meeting place for local resi- dents. •Use building massing, detail and color to emulate the impressions gained from the illustrations of Wysocki, Norman Rockwell, and The Field Guide to American Homes by Virginia & Lee McAlester. This setting and style is known generally as colonial and includes vari- ants of English, Adam, Classical Revival, and Colonial Revival. These styles evolved in the New England region and from this point forward in this document will be referred to as "New England." 3. OBJECTIVES • Ensure buildings have complexity at a human scale, which can be enjoyed at a pedestrian pace. • Buildings should help define Liberty Square by fronting on this main social gathering space for the neighborhood. • All buildings should represent a consistency of mass- ing and detailing on all four sides. 4. APPROVAL BACKGROUND • The visual impact of one or all buildings is to not be the standard strip mall and or free standing stores surround- ed by parking, facing the highway, with blank wall/util- ity enclosure to sides and 'rear' . Rather, the approvals Canopies and tasteful, decoratively shaped & edged signs help inform and entertain. Page 2 Larger windows, awnings, varied roof alignments, canopies, and bracket mount- ed signage create a visually interesting place to be, and a place to which people will want to return. One & two story buildings, which favor roof dormers, provide A.R.C. the o essence of New England style buildings. given by the Stillwater Town Board over 6 years ago, were based on the verbal picture that follows more less from this quote made in the pivotal Town Board approval meeting: "But what if the buildings looked like a (New England) country store", with gas "pumps under a roof that looks like a covered bridge, screened from the road by an in - theme building that hap- pens to be a car wash", with a country doctors office... And all build- ings front on a village green." • The approval came with the idea that the Board members' dislike was not for the "What" of the commercial use, but the "how" it was usually done. Each saw the positive value and convenience of the services being close by, but their resistance was due to a precon- ceived notion of how commercial buildings, parking and grounds 'always look'... would look. The problem was, therefore, not the "what", it was the "how"... how the buildings would be positioned, massed, detailed and signed. • The underlying family partners/property owners, ancestors have owned the land since 1849 when Liberty Newman and his father gained homestead title to the land from the U.S. government. His grandfather fought in the revolutionary war; a Newman daughter married a Dows son, son of the man who rode, as did Paul Revere, to alert the country side of British military actions. Acquaintances from New England, the Masterman family, also came west and set- tled across the road from the Newman farm. The Masterman's rela- tives owned property next to the bridge in Concord, Vermont, where the revolutionary war began. • The street, New England Way, within Liberty Village names the theme of Liberty Village architecture. What does this mean for the plan and design of each Liberty Village Building? • Adhere to the spirit and the letter of the guidance of the concept and preliminary site plans that obtained the approvals for the con- venience store use. • Buildings must face both the highway frontage and the parallel parking & sidewalks bracketing the Green. • Design floor plans that cause the stores, offices, businesses to ori- ent to both Liberty Square and the perimeter road frontage and bor- dering parking. • Side walk seating and recessed accesses should invite drivers and pedestrians from t-ie Village Green side of the buildings. • The desired aspect of added in-store security, gained by views into the stores, will be served by customer activity, presence & movement from the Liberty Square side of the building and perimeter parking areas. Proper pedestrian access and windows facing the sidewalks and parallel parking on the green will encourage and enable more of the desired customer access and visual scrutiny. Decorative facade, cornice trim of frieze, crown mold and symmetrical, paralleled window positions. Decorative, formal, themed signage accent simple building elevations. Page 3 LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC STRUCTURES... Right: Liberty's clock tower shows the stone/break off block in limestone color, red brick, crown mold details, and roof cupola. Left: The booster pump building shows materials of red brick, white trim, a cupola vent, nar- row overhangs, & ide frieze. Heritage Square's gazebo (behind the mail structure) uses tradi- tional doric round columns & exposed beams below the soffit & lattice. 1IJIIrilL 0 0, o „0 \ , /A H1-AHI E�q �uwq I�-- LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT Above: The walk bridge to school shows the New England detailing of steep pitch roofs, flush gable rakes, & picket fences. Right: The school's architecture employs brick ele- ments "anchoring" the cedar shingle- clad, gable roof ele- ments. Left: Square columns support steeply pitched roof with narrow rakes & overhangs, bracket traditional light fixture. Colors of picket fence and trim unify archi- ecture of landscape elements. Page 4 LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOMES... LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT.. . VARIETY, WITHIN THE HOME. LIBERTY'S NEW ENGLAND STYLE HOMES... LIBERTY VILLAGE ARCHITECTURAL INSPIRATIONS ALREADY BUILT... VARIETY, WITHIN THE HOME A.R.C. GUIDELINES ILLUSTRATIONS AND ELEVATIONS Concept Aerial Sketch: View of Liberty Village buildings north of pond m Liberty Square. Bank is at Right LIBERTY VILLAGE Preliminary building Elevations: Building #3, studying massing, style and colors. Note New England/Colonial style for signage adaptations. Concept Sketch Elevations of Building #3 (Office/Retail/Live-Work), and Building #4 (Bank) at right. ith steep -pitched main roof elements, flush rake overhangs, symmetrical window treatments, some with shutters. See illustration below Signage and Business Identity is critical for success. Appropriate themed sign design, detail and placement help bring preliminary Building #3 Elevation "Alive". Facing Manning Avenue, Elevation drawing shows decorative signs mounted on walls, roofs, brackets and canopies. Page 7 RECOMMENDED: Varied massing, angled positions, and openings for pedestrians help attract customers. RECOMMENDED: Inset entry, signs on brackets, & larger windows create visual/social interest. Note- Vertical emphasis of design. NOT RECOMMENDED: Tight sidewalk width restricts com- fortable use of dinning tables & prevents sidewalk trees with tree grates. 5. BUILDING PLACEMENT AND SITE CONSIDERATIONS Within the context of separately owned buildings and lots, the structures are to be positioned and connected to create as much "shops -on -a -green" impression as possible. Setbacks of buildings from the front prop- erty line will only be allowed for pedestri- an oriented activities, such as seating, spe- cific landscaping elements or outdoor activity areas. These dimensions can be very sensitive. Anticipating future poten- tial sidewalk dining requires careful antic- ipation of tree grates, pedestrian move- ment, and table placement. Because the buildings also face highways 12, 15 and the Green, they must present themselves attractively on all sides. Pathway or sidewalk connections will be made between buildings, parking and site features. The parking areas must be visually divid- , ed into smaller elements via planted medi- ans, islands, grade changes and/or plant- ed berming. 6. BUILDING MASSING Overall architecture and landscape archi- tecture is to be united with a "New England" design character. This style is characterized by an emphasis on narrow and varied width shop fronts with sepa- rate identities obtained by trim, siding and facade changes. Structures are to be relat- ed by this style through individual build- ings or portions of buildings should be varied, with the style colonial "New England." RECOMMENDED: While extra parking lies to the other side of this building, the shops face both a village green and parallel parking out front. Provide sufficient width for comfortable side- walk uses. The vertical window treatments, and building variety of older main streets, are inspiration for Liberty Village. Page 8 RECOMMENDED: Multiple levels with recesses, canopies, & sidewalks create interest and draw customers. 7. BUILDING FRONTS Ground level expression and entries: Display or shop windows are provided at grade level to display merchandise and provide pedestrian interest. They should occupy 60 percent of the front facade, and aid in defining the entrance to the building. Windows, other than display or shop windows, should have a vertical empha- sis. 1 ▪ • The design of the building should help • make the street enjoyable, visually inter- esting and comfortable. Individual buildings should be integrated with the streetscape to bring activity within the building in direct contact with the people g on the street. 0 8. BUILDING HEIGHT 9. ROOF DESIGN Roofs of the primary structure must slope at 8:12 or greater. Porches, entries, and shelters can have flat, 3:12, or 4:12 pitches. Dormers with slopes 90° to the primary roof pitch should be 12:12. Shingles should be thicker butt, heavier weight, style asphalt in weathered grey shades or cedar shingles or composite materials emulating slate. Large expans- es of roof should be broken by dormers and offsets. RECOMMENDED: Even at one story height, the use of pedestrian scale lighting, signage, and canopy help make this an attractive place. NOT RECOMMENDED: The facades and columns lack style references. Page 9 NOT RECOMMENDED: Mixture of traditional shutters with more contemporary standing seam metal facade addition send conflicting style messages. NOT RECOMMENDED: Flat roof expressed by absence of cornice or other archi tectural features. Random positioning of awnings and signs. 10. FRANCHISE ARCHITECTURE Franchise architecture represents those build- ings designed in such a way as to make the services or goods sold immediately recogniza- ble through the use of a specific mix of architec- tural design, signage design, materials, light intensity & type, and colors of the building. These were first developed on or near high- speed freeways where taking the time to read a sign would be too difficult. Such designs are generally in conflict with the characteristics of pedestrian oriented commercial storefronts, and a village of shops, unified by a theme. • Trademark architecture is prohibited. 11.. MATERIALS Finish wall materials shall consist of brick, wood (cement board products allowed - such as James Hardie products), stone and glass. Site amenities, sign base structures and retain- ing structures shall utilize similar and comple- mentary building materials and New England design themes to further establish a unifying visual link between site and structures. 12. DETAILING Siding, trim, soffits, frieze and fascia materials should be of James Hardie "Hardi Plank, Hardi trim, Hardi Soffit" or approved equal, of hori- zontal bevel style , or in limited use, board and batten, and or shingles. Masonry materials should be focused on col- umn supports, masses emulating fireplace masses, or veneers on building masses repre- senting the "original structure", to which other "later additions" appear attached, and of clap- board siding. Masonry materials can also be used on components and signage supports close and visually prominent to the streets and sidewalks. NOT RECOMMENDED: Back -Lit, internally lit signs, metal canopies. NOT RECOMMENDED: Overly strong colors, striped awnings, dutch hip roof. RECOMMENDED:Varied building faces & levels. Roof top equipment is screened. Page 10 S Al RECOMMENDED: Surfaces made interesting through architectural detailing. Recesses and niches provided to allow customers a place to linger outside. Lighting, integrated with attractive signage sized for the pedestrians. RECOMMENDED: Columns, canopies, and visual interest. 13. SCREENING OF ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT • Screen exterior transformers and air conditioning units from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a man- ner that is compatible with the building and site design. • All roof equipment shall be screened from public view. • Use architectural elements to screen mechanical equipment. 14. UTILITY AREAS • Screen exterior trash receptacles, storage areas, service yards, and loading areas, from view of nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with the building and site design. Use materials and design treatment similar to buildings and "New England" style. Provide plant material to augment screening and blending into landscape. Integrate more uses into structure, such as signage, trellis, ect. 15. LIGHTING Lighting can add special character to the nighttime appear- ance of the area. It can illuminate building entrances, pedes- trian walkways, and advertising or floodlight special build- ings. However, if left without consideration of the entire Liberty Village experience, unchecked lighting can produce visual chaos, waste energy, create safety concerns, and impose upon the adjacent residents. • A coordinated lighting plan should be submitted for review with building plans. Provide information on each individual light fixture proposed, including fixture sections, lamp type, wattage, and photometric diagram. • Ceiling and wall mount lighting fixtures should be con- cealed or integrated into the overall design of the project. Light source should be hidden from direct pedestrian or motorist view or directed in a such a way that minimizes glare. • Traditional post and bracket mounted fixtures compatible in style with the "Vernon" style street lights should be select- ed. • Unshielded wall pack light fixtures are not appropriate. • Up -spots into boulevard and perimeter trees is encouraged. Provide weatherproof outlets at trees to enable holiday lighting. RECOMMENDED: Signage sized for visibility for customers driving by. Use of facade and cornice treatment on flat roofs. NOT RECOMMENDED: Strip center design with unbroken rows of parking spaces, sidewalks too narrow to allow sidewalk tree planting. Windows covered with sign placements. NOT RECOMMENDED: Severe color contrasts, internally lit letters. RECOMMENDED: Theme related architecture(but not this theme), masonry construction, and planing. Page 11 NOT RECOMMENDED: Wall mounted signs, internally lit signage, sidewalks without canopy trees, arbitrary shapes, material changes without detailing. 16. SIGNS AND GRAPHICS A key to the financial viability, vitality, civic interest and "pedestrian friendli- ness" of Liberty Village will be deter- mined by its signs. A reference to the Charles Wysocki illustration at left, records the use of signs that bring life to a village of shops and the conservative architecture of the colonial "New England" style. Signage for Liberty Village is positioned in a variety of places on monuments or on out buildings, on trellis/arbor ele- ments, on building wall/roof surfaces, on brackets, on canopies, on light posts, and in windows. In each case, the selection of type face, • size, graphic symbol, color, detailing, and l• ights are important to achieving A.R.C. s approval. Internally lit or translucent let- • tering is not acceptable. • The Liberty Village site plan has pre- determined perimeter sign locations and will allocate spaces for each owner/ten- ant. •All signage lighting is to be by reflected light either off the sign face, or off the let- ter/sign background, silhouetting the letters. • Lettering is to be of an approved type face except by individual approval by A.R.C. Above: Good example of directory signage for a multi -tenant building. Projecting signs with appropriate materials, size, shape, and location. Page 12 BRINE 2l l l i l l l l l g111111'0 01111110Tal1 r STREET SIGNAGE EXAMPLES DOWNTOWN STILLWATER, MN LIBERTY VILLAGE Page 13 FONT CANDIDATE SELECTIONS LibertyVilidge 2?(7ie241`l' • (/ Alison IL -13,LRTY VIl ,LAGE Castellar MT Liberty Village New Century Liberty Y1 LL U Willow Liberty Village Times LIBERTY VILLAGE Capitals Liberty Village Bodoni Liberty Village Talon Liberty Village Minion Lthe1zTy Vi La C Oxford Liberty Village Lydian MT , LibertjV� llaPa�PYe rus Ltbert)/✓ Vt&qe Caflisch Lilb xe lrt\y \Vflll]lagce Viva Calrton LIBERTY VILLAGE Liberty Village L15[flTY VILLAG[ Liber[y Village Liberty Village R3eriy rllay J.tCe.r&1 YtPPs- Lbert2 �ill�ge /d,'4-7."(4 »rtij W(ac:e Tyndale Parrish Ambient Dard Hunter Salon J Hopper da Vinci Victorian Cezanne E Hopper Michelangelo Dearest Page 13A RECOMMENDED: Well proportioned neon signs in windows. Steady pitched 12:12 awnings in tasteful color(s) that respond to architectural detailing and window shapes. RECOMMENDED: Signs mounted on walls (or roofs), with type sized for reading at a com- mon viewing distance from a car, or on the street to walk to store fronts. Signage placement on/behind windows must not exceed 25% of window surface. Lettering on awning valances. 17. AWNINGS • Retractable or operable awnings are encouraged. Fixed awnings should mimic the profile of operable units (one to one pitch). • The emphasis of the awning should remain one of shelter and protection, rather than signage. In keeping with this; the awning should be loose and flowing, not stretched tight, subtle and subdued in color, not bright, extending well out over the sidewalk, not mere window dressing. • The width of awnings should fit the geometry of the building facade. They should not extend across multiple store- fronts of different buildings, but should reflect the window or door openings below. • The use of water-repellent or vinyl - coated canvas is in keeping with awnings of the time. Plastic or aluminum awnings or canopies are not appropriate. • Fixed, round -headed awnings will be considered only over arched windows or doors, and only if placed below or within the arched lintel. • The awning valance, or skirt, shall be proportioned to the size of the awning but shall not exceed twelve (12) inches in height. • Signing on awnings is permitted on the end panel (lower 25% of the slope) or front valance only. Use lettering size pro- portional to the space available. • Back lighting of the awnings is inap- propriate. • Use plain or striped fabrics. Large areas of very bright colors are inappropriate. RECOMMENDED: Canopy colors and angles help bring visual interest, variety, and shelter to the shopper. Page 14 RECOMMENDED: Canopies, umbrellas in public spaces create "civic" spaces. Lingering invited. RECOMMENDED: Even strong colors in carefully selected shades work well in bringing a gathering place to life. 18. COLORS The relationship of the colors and tones used on new or improved structures must be compatible with the color and tone patterns already established by adja- cent buildings. The tasteful use of color and accent can introduce variety and charm, whereas the indiscriminate use of colors and color combinations can over- load the senses and produce visual con- flict and chaos. Exercise caution in the use of colors and tone combinations and their patterns. The goal is to achieve an area -wide complementary blend of back- ground colors combined with selected and limited uses of primary and focal colors. • The color of buildings should relate to the adjacent buildings colors to create a harmonious though varied effect. • Avoid colors, which visually overpow- er or strongly contrast with adjacent building colors and established color schemes as a whole. • The color of brick or other natural building materials should dictate the color family choice. • Sign colors are a significant source of interest, contrast and accent. • Actual color samples of the materials to o be used must be of sufficient size to see at c a distance outside must be provided to the A.R.C. Page 15 19. PARKING Parallel parking will be provided between the front of the building and Liberty Square (refer to site plan). These will be short-term spaces for easy accessibility to retail shops. Longer -term parking will be provided at the rear of the structures. Parking quantities will be based on performance -based industry stan- dards. A reduction in the number of required off-street parking spaces may be allowed in the case of shared park- ing areas, if peak operation times are different and parking quantities are supported by substantiated industry standard of specific vendor "proof of parking" performance operational data. A reduction on one (1) parking space from the number of required off-street parking spaces may be approved for each on -street parking space at the lot frontage on a public street, provided sufficient sidewalk street furniture and street facing design, detail and signage are provided. 20. BICYCLE PARKING Bike racks should be provided in appropriate locations to encourage exercise and non -vehicular use. Each site in Liberty Village should provide a location and rack. 21. STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS Store operators are required to include spaces and "street furniture" such as benches, game/picnic tables, drinking fountains as well as walk up windows to dispense products during summer months. Inevitably, this will lead to RECOMMENDED: Sheltering porches, columns bring interest to conservative main building mass and roof detail. Page 16 RECOMMENDED: Tree grates enable boulevard tree use. Canopies and awnings offer a pedestrian orientated urban setting. ©2003 Putman PI added litter and 'loitering." Properly designed store interiors, that enhance store attendants focus to be directed to these out- door spaces, will do much to quietly govern civic behavior. The decision to create the pedestrian -friend- ly community of Liberty on the Lake is in part, a commitment to build and maintain the public and semi-public spaces to which pedestrians are drawn. To object to main- taming these, once one has decided to build in Liberty, is to forget one of its attractions and source of added value. Store owner/operators should anticipate added exterior upkeep both through their Liberty Village Shops on the Square Association, and sustain their individual upkeep budgets. Crosswalks are to be provided where shown on the site plan. Varied paving colors/paint with crosswalk signage is a minimum treat- ment. Paving texture changes are encour- aged. 22. LANDSCAPING • Highlight important architectural features and structures by use of distinctive land- scaping. • Visually and physically buffer parking lots from adjacent buildings and pedestrian walkways with groupings of plant materi- als. • Frame and edge buildings where feasible ▪ with appropriate types of plant material to achieve human scale. • Carefully locate street trees and shrub plantings to buffer and separate walkways from traffic. Create shade where needed for pedestrian and establish more clearly defined pedestrian use areas. Distinctive architectural styling is enhanced by the careful placement of street trees and "street furnishing." Page 17 RECOMMENDED: Street trees soften architectural features and provide enclosure/safe- ty for pedestrians. • Establish where practical, canopy trees to pro- vide shade for parked cars. Tree planting in park- ing lot islands will reduce heat gain and should be encouraged. • Avoid blocking sight lines to primary building signage. This can be accomplished through prop- er plant species selection and/or trimming/pruning. • Each liberty Village owner is responsible for adhering to the master planing plan for the street trees and perimeter planing requirements when specific site building and sign plans are present- ed to A.R.C. • Minimum boulevard tree size is 3" cal. Minimum shrub size is 2' ht. Planting must meet or exceed American Nursery Standards. • Avoid eye level vegetation foliage at cross- walks and at street corners through proper plant specification and.or pruning/trimming. 23. MANAGEMENT CPDC employs an activities director to help initi- ate and advocate social activities, groups, and functions. This person also helps put in place sys- tems to be run by the Home Owners Association, once control goes to the residents. An equally well organized and active store owners associa- tion should be initiated and eventually received control by the store owners/tenants. - Separate and joint efforts of these groups can then organize activities and gatherings for Liberty Village and its Pavilion. Steve Russell, Stillwater Community Development Director has spoken for the need for locations for civic gatherings that currently go wanting for space.'rz Such activities would cause more activity to be p„ focused on the green...Liberty Square. This will help the shops gain added public presence, and become part of an occasional destination, in addition to a convenient stop. This typically enhances business revenues, and provides free advertising. Page 18 "NEW ENGLAND" COLONIAL STYLES: GEORGIAN MASSING, DETAILS A FIFI .11 GUIDE TO AVIERIC\ THE. GUIDE THAT ENARSFS YOU ID ID PLACE IN THEIR ILSTORIC AND. ARCHTIECI'URAI. CONTEXTS, TIlE HOUSES YOU SEE IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD OR.LN YOUR TRAVELS. ACROSS ANTERICA—HOUSES BUILT FOR .Aa,SERICAN FAMILIES (RICH, POOR, AND IN-BETWEEN), IN CITY AND COUNTRYSIDE, FROM THE 1711I CENTURY TO, THE PRESENT VIRGINIA & I ,FE MCALESTER 00000 00000 00[100 000 000 OUR Alabama Grorgia ACIPAL SETTLED AREAS, 1780 000 000 000 CHARLESTON HOUSE abort side Aimed to oreet, galleries along one 00000 Do[100 York rlin�.T60Y N Castle ON. 00ROO mouth msburg orfolk dotington ties Town (Charleston) halt •pn 'ql towns e �IHea from Fries. to6t Kagan, 1966 Chitwood, todt U U U ono / \ / 00000 00100 0000000 000RO00 BH86n 00 D0 0 00 D00 oro COMMON NORTHERN VARIANTS wally wood frame, en window touches op two-story examples MIDDLE COLONIES usually stone or brick, moo northern and fondsouthern variants here COMMON SOUTHERN VARIANTS usually brick, raised foundation. belt course hetween stories (also on northern masonry examples) 000 00 00n00 0000 Do o Dn MOST (MMMON IN NORTHERN COLONIES gambrel COMMON ONLY IN MIDDLE COLONIES side -gabled, dosed or podimentrd MOST COMMON IN SOUTHERN COLONIES AND IN HIGH -STYLE EXAMPLES, ALL. COLONIES double -hippo° hipped ROOF SHAPE MOST COMMON IN NORT TERN COLONIES central chimney IMNEY PLACEMENT COMMON IN ALL COLONIES COMMON IN SOUTHERN AND MIDDLE COLONIES paired interior paired end paired double chimneys chimneys Interior chimneys FOUND NLE EXAMEL.slu COLONIES pared double end chimneys BUILDING MASSING AND WINDOW PATTERN mz = 4 pa common U-. OO 0 0 0 0' Adamcsquc de i surround or light x= ,IJJ.IJ.LLL ommo .,.,. - r.•.= _ common rim ,off: nn eo on m 00 00 00 00 0o . DO' Y0 ram, raM EODE nn l:IIoo, tool :nn: id, _- �'.Trt itril i00i iaa _ cmtmo DO Rn$ }� I0� 1 oo ,++ DO .jt .51 III 0 El L En S Y' c ` vciii) o �., 9r eomm D ,thin II �� ili 1 ENTRIES Page 19 COLONIAL: "NEW ENGLAND" STYLE VARIATIONS & DETAILS GREEK REVIVAL .4,44M WINLNA4 1.1/11.1M GEORGIAN DETAILS ODD! !... oo 1-14,0-STORY ZN p&$ 133-1 CLASSIC REVIVAL MASSING ONG-STOPY GABLE MONT AND WINGS ,7S NOTE: Note the shallow overhang & frieze at the gable & almost flush overhang at the rake. WINDOW TREATMENTS soloctot. Ina0 \1111 /NI Itglrirml uu 00B 000 9,9 no. p.,131A oau burn colonic, 1111 NMI MON 11.11111 7,1 IONS HI 6/ 9/6 16, nr(11I 12/. A 6,04, rw,pular 01,-en rninnies IL Leyvone lintel 13a$ i3i6 comm." .3. 311c.Au.31..3 1 4- .33, 13.31031333 33...34,33.1.3,./alena .4 13 occur ru33. x3.3.3,113 331, 31,31,033 C.D.S113,33SONS:(13:033(31331, 33 ADAM Oru 11110-1. AO *411 N 1.3,141.11 wa,n1,71,11 3.3.311uw-mulaud. 11,3.3131eenratuu Adam conutui Page 20 Symmetrical window positioning for each building front is typical of New England/Colonial styles. Roof pitches are steeper and roofs have shallow gable overhangs and flush or very shallow rake overhangs. Page 21 PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES Architectural Review & Design Guidelines for : Glossary Baluster: A short post in a series supporting a handrail and thus forming a balustrade. Balustrade: A hand railing or upright posts or balusters. Bay: An outward projection of a wall with windows, or a division in a wall seen as space between piers or columns. Blocking Course: The plain course of stone surmounting the cornice at the top of the building; also a projecting cornice of stone or brick at the base of a building. Canopy: A projection or hood over a door, window, niche, etc. Capital: The head or crowning feature of a column. Cladding: An external covering or skin applied to a structure for aesthetic or protective purposes. Column: An upright member, designed to carry a load. Concrete: Cement mixed with coarse and fine aggregate (such as pebbles, crushed stone, brick) , sand and water in specific proportions. Coping: A capping or covering to a wall, either flat or sloping to throw off water. Corbelling: Brick of masonry courses, each built out beyond the one below like a series of corbels to support a projections, windows, etc. Cornice: Any projecting ornamental molding along the top of a building, wall, etc., fin- ishing or crowning it. Dentils: Small brick blocks or toothed wood decorative members found in classical or period architecture in cornices, or other horizontal bands on building facades. Eaves: The under part of a sloping roof overhanging a wall. Elevation: The external faces of a building:, also a drawing made' in projection on a ver- tical plane to show any one face of a building. False Fronts: A vertical extension of a building facade above a roofline to add visual height. Fascia: A plain horizontal band, which may consist of two or three fascia over sailing each other and sometimes separated by narrow moldings. Fenestration: The arrangement of windows and doors in a building. Gable: The triangular part of an exterior wall, created by the angle of a pitched roof with two sides. LIBERTY VILLAGE Hipped Roof: A roof with pitched or sloped ends and sides, which rise from all four sides of a building. Lintel: A horizontal beam or member above a door or window, which supports the wall above the facade opening. Mullions: The frames of divisions within multi -pane windows. Muntin: The vertical part of a door, screen, paneling, etc., butting into, or stopped by, the horizontal rails. Parapet: A low wall, placed to protect any spot where there is a sudden drop, for exam- ple, a wall projecting above a roof plane. Pier: A solid masonry support, as distinct from a column, the solid mass between doors, windows, and other openings in buildings. Pilaster: A shallow pier or rectangular column projecting only slightly from a wall. Pillar: A freestanding upright member, which, unlike a column, need not be cylindrical or conform to any of the orders. Ridge: The horizontal line formed by the junction of two sloping surfaces of a roof. Sash: The frame, which holds window panels, and forms the movable part of the win- dow. Shutter: A rectangular wood or cast iron piece, set on hinges and used to cover a win- dow or door. Historically used for security or to protect window or door openings from natural elements. Sill: The lower horizontal part of a window -frame. Soffit: The underside of any architectural element. String Course: A continuous projecting horizontal band on a building facade usually made of molding (wood or plaster) or masonry. Page 22 • • 502 Second Street, Suite 301 Hudson, WI 54016 Phone: 715.381.8291 Fax: 715.381.6829 marc@putmanplanninganddesign.com • • 411 ID 111 fib Ilb DATE: 17 April 2009 i At the request and authorization of the Liberty Village property owners and tenants, we • are submitting the following Planned Unit Development Amendment. This is primarily an act of "housekeeping" for the Liberty Village project. We have also modified the original draft version of the Design Guidelines to incorporate important new information gleaned from marketplace performance regarding the signing of this unique commercial property. The recent ordeal of reconstruction of Manning Avenue, challenged Liberty Village. Thus, business owners saw this as an ideal time to finalize and update (with six years lb better knowledge) the Liberty Village Design Guidelines with clarification of the Overall 111 Signing Plan (See pages 13-30). fb S A BRIEF HISTORY 110 In 1997, the Concept Master Plan for Liberty on the Lake and Liberty Village was lb presented after hundreds of meetings with residents and regulatory agencies. From that lb point, to 2003, when the Liberty Village Preliminary Plat was submitted, the site size, building sizes and positions were almost identical. The initial, and continued goal of the Village is to provide the convenience shopping, office, dining and gathering opportunities common to the traditional neighborhoods of our past. A full copy of the original PUD Narrative is attached at the back for your review. For reasons yet unknown, the Architectural Review & Design Guidelines were never officially made a part of the Planned Unit Development. Although unofficially, when fb known of, the Design Guides were used for all of the buildings constructed in Liberty lb Village to date. This PUD Amendment will officially make the Design Guides part of the Liberty Village PUD. 411 flb ED Page 1 of 3 lib TO: Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Mike Pogge, City Planner, Heritage Preservation Commission Members, Planning Commission Members, Members of the Stillwater City Council and Mayor Ken Harycki. cc: Liberty Village Business Association RE: Liberty Village, Planned Unit Development Amendment, Stillwater MN el ED • el - THE UNIQUENESS OF LIBERTY VILLAGE The Liberty Village site plan established a different approach for the store designs, one - not common in this era of "strip commercial" shopping. While the site does front on two major county roads (12 & 15), the stores also orient inward toward the neighborhood. S This "shops on the green" approach, while steeped in history, presented new challenges - in balancing the walkable convenience to the adjacent neighborhood and the vehicular convenience to the county arterial users. In terms of signing, this means the site acts as an arterial commercial area on one side, and a walkable commercial area on the other. • Please consider our initial observations regarding signing Liberty Village, and the starting points from which we began writing the Liberty Village Design Guidelines: 1. TND (Traditional Neighborhood Developments) commercial projects have, on • balance, not done as well in the competitive marketplace as strip malls... their prime • competitors. From the language of the Village Commercial Zoning Ordinance, in order to "provide a local center for convenience shopping and personal services primarily in proximity 111 to residential neighborhood ", it is first necessary that the businesses be able to be and stay - profitably open. This, of course, requires customers gaining awareness of, and being regularly reminded of, the "convenience" shopping. fib - These requirements for success depend on visibility to the customer. Such identity and visibility is the life -blood of any retail/business/ commercial enterprise, but to small businesses in particular. This grows even more critical, when the shops and services for - such a "village" will typically never benefit from regional or national advertising & public relations campaigns. Shops at Liberty Village are locally owned and managed. - 2. Regrettably, Liberty Village's site plan was not approved with a forward -looking signage plan, to help overcome its (then -unknown) inherent competitive challenges. • 3. The essence of the idyllic form of Liberty Village's "shops on the green" site plan "turned" some of the businesses away from the life -blood customers traveling on the perimeter highways (Hwy. 15 & Hwy. 12). And, we did not know, at the time Liberty - on the Lake and Liberty Village was designed and approved, that the added costs of TND development, construction and marketing would need to be offset by added identity efforts, advertising and higher profile signage presence. There was not sufficient - signing experience, at the time, with the "models" from other regions that helped guide Liberty Village's design. 1111 4. What we now know is that, whether shopping is for "convenience", "personal services" or others, the vitally needed customers are on the bordering highways. And • from that route, they are using the same eyes and attention spans, independent of whether it is convenience shopping, or big -box shopping that needs to be noticed for the - businesses' financial survival. If regulations demand that the TND / Village Commercial stores be minimally visible & signed primarily only to the customers "in proximity to the residential neighborhood", then these stores will perpetually struggle, and suffer high tenant turnover. (Numerous Liberty shop operators report new customer comments to the effect that "I did not know you were here!" ... after these customers have driven by for years.) This is the last thing we wanted and the last thing that should be allowed to happen. If fa Traditional Neighborhood Development (with sought-after municipal advantages of calmed traffic, distributed parking, an emphasis on pedestrian use and positive • aesthetics) is desired by governments... then such dedicated, note -worthy efforts should fib Page 2 of 3 • • willingly be provided incentives for the added costs and marketing challenges. • 5. Strip Malls are designed to show off one of their building facades most visibly to the • highway -traveling customer, often with low-cost, less attractive backs and sides. Their internally lit signs draw attention often to single entry points and single frontages. Strip • malls also prominently position large tracts of parking in prominently visible locations. • City and neighborhood aesthetics, the local shopper and the pedestrian can suffer. 6. What we've come to realize, (for Liberty Village and its similarly -planned fore- runners), is that the more subtle but more costly architectural forms, multiple entries, ID customer. / distributed parking and more extensive planting can screen and confuse the customer. ID If such TND's, (with their greater community -building & aesthetic potentials), are ever to flourish and find greater market acceptance, then the inherent marketing challenges • must be counter -balanced with more visible, but well designed identity / signage. ID 7. The reality is that Liberty Village life -blood customers are traveling at 2 kinds of • speeds & distances: mostly Fast and Farther, and then, once attracted and within Liberty Village, Slow and Closer. Thus, to provide equity to marketing appeal ... the signage size & quantity must be geared to both customer -perception "settings". For highway speeds: larger & taller signs, well lit ... For local vehicle and pedestrian speeds: somewhat - smaller signs, still well lit. (For each; well designed, perhaps with the eclectic flavor of Downtown Stillwater, with a historic & strong design influence... as conveyed in the • original Design Guidelines.) • The above experiences and realizations have formed the basis of our Liberty Village • Planned Unit Development Amendment. To our research, Liberty is the most awarded Minnesota planned community on both a • national, regional and local level, for planning, amenities, identity, signage, environmental design, and the homes. The bridge & trail -connected school is prized, the home values have been protected, and many other neighborhoods have been inspired & • enabled, based on Liberty's design principles & superb execution. • The last challenge for each of us is to learn from our experiences, the experiences of • others, and put in place the mechanisms so the dedicated commercial vendors and users can see the success & enjoyment that the rest of Liberty has experienced. One way or the • other, the high -profile nature Liberty will continue to instruct many planning & design • professionals, for years to come.... that the final details & approvals matter as much or more as the original, much applauded, concept. ID • ID ID ID ID ID ID We appreciate your review of the PUD Amendment and look forward to the continued commercial and neighborhood success of Liberty Village. Respectfully submitted, Marc Put an Principal Putman Planning and Design Page 3 of 3 PUTMAN PLANNING & DESIGN. LIBERTY VILLAGE PUNNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT MASTER SITE PLAN NARRATIVE II t • ...HI. • ,,r17....1f.1:. • +.7 ',VIENIL-, DEThr.`. L TO CC REGARDING NEIGHBORHOOD MUNICIPALITY DALE Mr. Steve Russell, Director of Community Development, City of Stillwater Joint ad. Members, CPD(, ARC,' ACt Members., Newman Rlly. Kwik Trip, lst StRank & T Planned Unit Development Application Narrative, Liberty on the Lake Stillwater, Mn. February 28, 2003, Revised Mar& 5, W03, March 25, 2003 LIBERTY VILLAGE CONSISTENCY OF PLAN FROM FIRST LIBERTY ON THE LAKE CONCEPT SITE PLAN: Liberty Vil • e was integral with Liberty on the Lake's master site plan from the first lines drawn on paper. The Village was conceived to provide the convenience shopping, office, dining and gathering opportunities common to Traditional Neighborhoods of our past. This, to strengthen the cohesive and complete nature of Liberty's neighborhoods, completing the intent and content of Liberty's original land plan. From the 1997 Liberty Concept Master Plan, to the 2003 Liberty Village Plan, the site size and buildings sizes and positions are almost identical except for changes required by traffic engi- neering. 'the stores are so much a part of the fabric of this planned community that they were made part of Liberty's Logo. Liberty Village was also designed in response to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Plan, providing a much needed and carefully positioned local source for fuel, convenience groceries, bank- ing, dining / Falb/ deli, office and professional services for the city, township and county residents use. The village stores will reduce internal resident traffic burdens on perimeter highway intersections. 'this is a side benefit of serving resident's local, daily needs for purchases —errands that, otherwise, would burden Liberty homeowners with the increased inconvenience and ever-present risks of longer drives on busy, higher speed roads for "convenience" shopping. These efficiencies and neighborhood benefits of Liberty on the Lake have been recognized locally and nation-wide. (Research indicates Liberty has received more Regional and National planning, design and smart growth awards than any other Twin Cities planned community in history.) One of the rea- sons for these awards is the integration of pedestrian -friendly shopping into Liberty's land plan. 2. "SHOPS ON THE VILLAGE SQUARE': Liberty Village's site plan calls for store designs not com- mon in this era of "strip commercial" shopping. While the site at Liberty on the Lake's Northwest cor- ner fronts on both highway 15 and 12, the shops will also orient "in" to the community /neighborhood. This places added tasks on the design of the buildings and individual shop owner/operators floor plans, not unlike some stores in downtown Stillwater. PdRe 1. [ev March 4.2.003 Llesras Offem 639 Ind SI. %Ma arA uudsco. WI 54016 • phone €715,39] 40291 * tax pis) 561.. Aals, • E Mati: 4niraltPuhtnanFlanntin DROGN fiftl*X 724 Nvoroilaii fit;Plaitstatilitll 84alo 441itatei :11•141: ;Krt.. This inward focus, however is not unbuffered. Realizing, at the time of the first concept plan prepa- ration (in 1993), that commercial uses can affect residential lifestyles and values, I ibeity Square... a large village green is sized, positioned,. improved and planted to provide both transition, separation, and ... connection. 3. VILLAGE COMMERCIAL ZONING: The Village Commercial Zoning Ordinance, passed some 5 years ago around the same time as I iberty's Master Plan approval, sought to govern two potential types of development...those without a Planned Unit Development approach, and a development plan using a P.U.D. The former. of course, carries the typical, more simplistic restrictions. This, because the city has much less design control than under a P.U.D. The language of the last clause of the ordinance no. 830: (section 5) states: lrbese development itquirements may be meddled based on an acceptaHe planned unit development for the entire village costume:oil] district area." allows (and therefore enables and motivates) much more freedom of innovation, use and quality to be woven into a land plan and its buildings. We believe that Liberty Village's plan, the work of UDC and its Architectural Review Committee, and its first two buildings, display the faithful and continuing commitment the (PDC team, and demonstrates the wisdom of such an ordinance approach. 4. CIRCULATION SYSTEM: TWO WAY ROADS, ON -STREET PARKING, TRAFFIC CALMED: Liberty Village's site plan and, in particular its road configuration, has been extensively studied. Over 21 alternate Liberty/Liberty Village concept road plans were drawn, early on and exhaustive- ly reviewed. This, before the preliminary drawings were provided to both the developer's retained traffic engineer and City for review by their traffic engineers. These plans were debated, reviewed, re -reviewed and refined numerous times. Much attention was focussed on a road design that would not invite, nor enable short-cut traffic, to avoid the intersection at Hwy. 12 and 15. Numerous design tactics and tools were and are employed to calm the village commercial traffic. For example, the many "T" intersections, required turning movements, the angled road intersections, the "not -fat streets", the on -street parallel and angled parking, the frequency of intersections, the presence of boulevard trees and sidewalks, the closeness of the buildings to the curbs, the positioning of attractive park features in driver's sight lines, the paving changes at frequent aim walks...all these combine to compel a lower speed limit, to impose traffic calming effects, while helping create a PLACE. What drove the planning was the goal of cre_atirtg a safe place for kids of all ages to walk or bike to the store dr batk. To our knowledge, no shopping place in the Twin Cities uses these tools to the extent employed at Liberty Village. Intersection locations on both highway 12 and 15 were also intensively reviewed by the County Highway Department, as was the modern round -about School House Circle. In fact, the County cre- ated new access restrictions and applied them to Liberty Village. The City's traffic consultant in joint meetings with all parties (including the representatives from the School district) analyzed all available traffic data. This overlapping regulatory approach resulted in the number, lanes and the intersection controls at the highway access points to which Liberty and liberty Village now connect.TrafEr capacity studies were prepared by the respected traffic engineer- ing firm of Benshoof and Associates and subsequently reviewed by the City's consulting traffic engi- neer (s). This included trip data that was generated in conjunction with the comprehensive environ- mental studies done to understand the impacts of the city annexations along Manning Avenue. paw 1. ley March Le. i.00 ID The County's requirements for future highway improvements and trails was also made part of the - development restrictions and requirements. These regulations compelled the added width of right of way for Hwy. 15. This, to enable expansion to multiple lanes and other improvements anticipated by • the County Hwy. Dept.. Of course, the schedule of these improvements to Highway 15 and 12 and their intersection lies whol- ly with the County. As with any public intersection or road upgrade, the concept of "warrants" are - employed. In short, the addition of stop lights or extra lanes is based on what is warranted...needed. Prudence in the use of taxpayer dollars for road expansion requires sufficient need to motivate these ✓ improvements. This need is found in "level of service" ratings...basicaally, the length of time it takes to get on the higher volume road, or thou an intersection. As the average wait times increase, eventual- ly, the improvements will be designed and constructed. More Highway 15 & intersection improve- s ments are scheduled by the County. As is clear from the foregoing, the roads and intersections of Liberty Village are as much a result of the . City and County Governments as they are the Planner's or the Developer's. We have been steadfast, however, in promoting what industry and professional standards alike would see as the best solutions available. 5. NOISE: In planning Liberty, there has always been awareness regarding the noise from Hwy 12 ID and particularly Manning Ave., Hwy. 15. The area served by these roads is large, and the threshold of • traffic volumes was reached long ago, sufficient to create a noisy road. The presence of a stop sign, or future stop lights is and will further contribute to the noise, independent of Liberty, or Liberty Village. Anyone accomplishing their "due diligence", anticipating the large investment in a home at Liberty's north end had ample evidence of the traffic volumes, speeds present and noise levels prior to their purchase. • There are two effective methods of reducing traffic noise: one is to barrier homes with solid masses, such as larger buildings, and the other is to plant large trees. Liberty Village's land plan does both of 4111 these. The overlapping massing of the buildings will help shield the town homes and detached homes - from much direct "line of sight" sound. And, the extensive planting planned, particularly the boule- vard trees planted, on average, some 40' to 5(Y on center, will attenuate more vehicle noise. ID ID and proposed planting, as with virtually every other meaningful feature within Liberty on the Lake, and Liberty Village, far exceeds the minimums under a standard zoning approach . ID The grocery and fuel (Kwik Trip) store was located and positioned to screen both highway noise and • primary stone activities from Liberty Square, most Liberty homes and the school. The pump location • and orientation of the main store entry mean that all fueling activity and most store patron's activity will be to the highway side of the store. 1111 6. THE CAR WASH & PUMPS: In the earliest liberty Village land plan, the car wash was positioned • and designed to screen most of the view of pumps from Manning Ave. As intended, the architecture and detailing echoes the look of early New England covered bridges. The unique deeply recessed 1111 entry and exit doors assist in the exterior design and help limit noise. Page 3, n v: >wloa h Lc, taioT Both coniferous and deciduous tree and shrub planting on the island in front of the exit facing the townhomes along Settlers Way will also attenuate the noise of the car wash. The planning commission discussed specification of the dryer brand, with lower noise levels as being an important lesson learned on another project. The unusual feature of the two-sided buildings of Liberty Village turns the liberty Square side of the shops themselves away from the highway noise. Our hope is that residents and visitors alike will be drawn to this setting, designed to be a slower paced, quieter, shops -on -the -square gathering place. I iberty Village's original concept plan showed a similar canopy and building size as the current PUT) proposal. What we have learned during specific design refinement is that because of the high percent- age of 'drive offs"... (people who leave without paying for gas), the orientation of the drive isles has to face the attendents in the store. This refinement had no impact on the aesthetics or scale of structures as originally intended. The pumps are still largly screened from view, the lighting is recessed and there are no back -lit, bright adverising panels high in the air. The roof over the pumps has been lowered almost 4 feet from standard canopy heights and redesigned to "fir' with the New England architecture of the main grocery -convenience store and the adjaomt shops to come. 7. THE RESTAURANT & LIQUOR LICENSE: As liberty on the Lakes plan evolved it became appar- ent that for the foreseeable future, I Iighway 15 would come to represent Stillwater's western bound- ary. This factor, blended with and supported our resolve to create an outstanding community addition to the City. As the sole commercial location on this western edge, made so by the City's zoning ordi- nance, it is important that its viability be assured by both careful selection of the type of businesses present and in providing the freedoms that their competitors enjoy and that they need to succeed. Building in Liberty, and Liberty Village is more expensive. The high design standards and oversight imposed both by the P.U.D. approval process, the Architectural Review Committee, Architectural Control Committee is resulting in more costly construction... and we believe a beautiful addition to the City of Stillwater. The City's support has had a lot to do with this success. This last phase of Liberty -I iberty Village is proceeding with the same level of commitment to quality as the developer, Homer Tompkins, Contractor Property Developers Company has demonstrated in the neighborhoods of Liberty already created. The goal of long term financial viability for the businesses invited into Liberty Village, (that are will- ing to pay for, and carry the cost of the design quality) is most important. A liquor license is a key to to enable CPIX to attract the highest quality and most experienced restaurant owner -operators and help assure that the significant, central and highly visible restaurant/deli /pub location sustains suc- cess. The initial and continued success of the shops and stores at Liberty is important to all of Liberty, on several levels. We all want to see liberty Village become a vibrant, civic gathering spot on Stillwater's border. So do others:._ over the years there have been many Liberty home prospects, buyers and resi- dents who've come into the Land Office wondering:" when will the restaurant and pub open?". Ptifie4 rev. !Ada L. ziaa; 0. THE POND IN LIBERTY ;SQUARE: With the significant recent refinement and approval of the • storm water runoff volume calculations, the central pond within Liberty square has beenrelieved of • most, in not all of its storm water storage "duty". This means that the pond will be able to have a more stable water level, that is just 4 feet below the elevation of the perimeter sidewalk and street elevation. • This, and the use of boulder walls will allow the water surface to be brought closer to both the gaze- bo/pavilion and the sitting area south across the street from the bank. A floating, lit, fountain will help provide water circulation and aeration helping to clarify the water The water jet will also add visual • focus and be an attractive amenity, drawing visitors to both the park, pavilion and the bordering shops. 9. ANTICIPATED USES OF LIBERTY SQUARE The master site plan uses Liberty Square to both • separate, buffer, but also link the "shops on the green" from/to the homes, townhomes and the resi- dents. • The grading and position of the pavilion/gazebo anticipate a variety of City park uses and functions. The large open irrigated turf area, in addition to being an attractive, tree -lined park, will provide ample space for informal audience seating during musical groups and performances. "Flea'" market, - farmers' market uses are also potentials. Vile understand that the City receives requests that it can not fulfill with current park locations. • The gazebo pavilion will offer shelter for park users and performers, while benches and game tables, both under and around the shelter, will also allow for casual daytime and evening conversation over- looking the pond and water fountain to the north. In winter, there is a potential for this structure to - provide shelter for ice skaters. The retaining walls and steps to the water will permit winter access for this skating, and in summer, could allow activities such as model (radio control) boat/sail boat races • for kids of all ages. 10. BUILDING DESIGN: Because each building must face both the perimeter and provide a weloom- • ing "front" on Liberty Village, the Architectural Guidelines require each owner/business operator to - respond with plans and designs and operational activity that is compatible and supportive of this goal. 11. SHARED PARKING for CITY PARK USERS: Parking space quantities and ratios include the use - of on -street spaces shown on the site plans. Liberty Village is a stand-alone Village Commercial area without the likelihood of expansion in size. From the initial concept plans, the sharing of parking • spaces was always anticipated... between commercial users, employees, park users and residents (if upper level residential uses are provided). • • flb • • • • • 12. LIMITATION ON BUILDING USES: 'ilo help assure sufficient parking of those who drive (and park) to use Settlers Park, Liberty Square and the adjacent trail system, Building 8 will be limited to office use, day care use (within covenant restrictions), and potential upper level residential use poten- tial. May -Aug. limitations on hours of operation may be put in place as needed. This, to provide suf- ficient week end parking spaces for City Park users. 9. BUILDING AREAS: Square Footages are based on Liberty Village Concept Site Plan and Prelim. Plat, and may vary at final site plan and final building plan approval application. 13. PARKING SPACE RATIOS: Sufficient, convenient parking enables customers to patronize busi- nesses. Ratios of parking spaces per 1000 square feet of building area requited for categories of build- ing use (ie.. 5: 1... 5 spaces per 1000 sq. ft.), will conform to City -required amounts; the most restrictive ratios being the retait ratio of 5:1 and restaurant at 10:1.. Where office or residential uses are planned, a method, acceptable to the City, of restricting the por- tions of buildings, (or whole buildings) so designated, will be part of the final building approval If time limit and type of use limit is acceptable to City, applicable parking ratio(s) (that may be lower than the generalized calculations (ie.., 5: 1) shown on the Parking Data chart) can be applied and modify allowable building main and upper floor areas. This information must then be part of subsequent pur- chase agreements & Association proceedings. 14. ADEQUACY OF SPACES, 'PROOF OF PARKING" DATA: We must have enough parking. Yet, we also should avoid having too many parking spaces, for the size and types of uses for the buildings and owner -businesses. We also want to 'build -in" the flexibility of building design, features and suf- ficiency of parking to enable a variety of businesses to succeed at Liberty Village, over time. The parking ratios, (and, therefore the parking space quantifies provided) are conservative, for they apply (per City standards) to gross floor areas, not the common net leasable floor areas. We propose, that, consistent with the PUD criteria of the Village Commercial zone, if sufficient and applicable evidence shows that less than the number of spaces specified in the City's general ordi- nances are actually needed to allow the specific business to operate properly, then choices can be con- sidered: 1. The number of spaces required will be reduced for that particular building, or 2. The build- ing floor area can be increased, or, 3. Another proximate building may be increased in size, by using the surplus spaces. These potential increases in building size will not be allowed if they compromise the aesthetics or oper- ational flexibility of the sidewalks and streetscape. 15. EMPLOYEE PARICING: Employee parking will be designated, and shall not use any on -street parking spaces. This, to help provide an ample supply of short term parking spaces to encourage patronage of I .iberty Village businesses, accessed from the Liberty Square side. 13. AGREEMENTS FOR JOINT USE OF PARKING: While some spaces for each building /businesa operator will be reserved via agreement and signage, most spaces will be open to all users, as is com- mon to most suburban shopping settings. Purchase agreement clauses and "Liberty Village Business Operators Association" covenants and guidelines will identify mutual use agreements covering park- ing spaces, openspaee we, maintenance obligations and City -Association maintenance and use responsibilities,park reservation mechanisms, etc. 16. SIGNAGE, REFUSE ENCLOSURES, TRAILS AND IMAGE: Liberty Village is bounded by trails on both the north and west sides, and the master site plan anticipated connections to these trails, lead- ing into Liberty Village. tic rev. Moth 14, zoo', • • • • • Other functional necessities of a commercial village include the need for sufficient signage to inform • the primary buyers (those drivers passing by on Manning avenue and Hwy. 12) of the services and products offered within Liberty Village. This is particularly important for Liberty Village since it is try- • ing something new to the contemporary commercial market place... stores that face both "in and our. • Aware of the less than attractive settings that can result from straight buildings and straight rows of • parking backing up to a highway, we have sought to design interest and visibility into the plan. Using • the refuse dumpster enclosure -garages as another opportunity to show the New England architectur- al style, the plan shows these structures flanking the trail entry. • • A trellis element with sign identifying Liberty Village offers a trail gateway. The surfaces of these struc- tures provide mounting for in -character signage, identifying businesses, services and products. Picket fences attached aid in screening the cars parked beyond. • • Other locations for signage, consistent with the Liberty Design Guidelines are designated on the site plan Agreements for the shared use of these signage locations will be integrated into the owner! open- • ator and Association agreements. • 17, PLANTING PLANS: The perimeter planting provides both screening of parking, oversgary trees, • and openings to preserve visibility of the shops and businesses. Along both external parking bays and • around liberty Square, boulevard trees are provided to create an attractive "main street" scene. • IS. FINAL SITE AND BUILDING PLANS: Final site plans may be refined to include added parking • spaces, and/or future potential, additional spaces via diagonal parking, added retaining walls, etc. • Building footprints may vary from those shown on the site plan but not to the point where they limit • future sidewalk (seating) uses and flexibility in marketing. • Such refinernenls must meet intent of Architectural Guidelines and receive Architectural Review • Committee and Architectural Control Committee approval before City Applications. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • }�a r. w•al. Awl • • • • I._ UUILDIN(.G NUMBER titit_DINC 1 ELILCL N 2 l CL JINit 3 { t 4 FLU I CL N G FOIENIIAI LAND t;SF S !MOT®: •t. agues Fbm0.s we bated na llbarla Wraps Camel Alee Flan ma Pats, Pat, aid any wry at Ina ale plus ma Meal OWI/Mg pia slams, apfll:ROM 12PIYng raen AS arddpeed uses wit aeWoa 10 alreea cagy - rewired aaeurltr the root rearIcli a melee bear9 eve real Mee et 5:I rid Iraralerenl el I? I p mr ery aliwled by *PniXe d scales" marsMale el epeeale awnrecece picas Were dim Wad lea leMm MS an pasaraa, a marled ed rptade le Inc 11} a resle[Wp the melons or bWdhps, tar shde spa) as hebnled. mil 6e pee d flee final appeal. Mee al ear Hoer e+d veer IkeaCW an aaalet ed lay mph** MEIN MIWA) Peeing ram are cassaweflee, to the! Willy tsar ay aluracds1 b Ilea* floor area, net Pal Low awe g apf+ eparr llae and tunas include snare l slam shams an as sib Para. IbMY Wage le ■ as crakes Wipe Caneem.l live. shahs ce mean/ spares Is eradiated eaannrmdd Mere, encamps, park we,, ad reviienla Qt upper lewd reeearda race wepresided)- 1111d1rg a all to Irene re aloe, des care Main cowman' INInmacp orb upper level rovibrlfal, May- a g, letrelane cr hems of apefelien may b• pet In Owe s needed, to smote suIRI Mn trran Slid Perk5ip scam Sr City Rs* JMara. enpmyae Pa- ull as dapples!, end eaaaced and shell not cane any ahead peaks ipecac, Pi+el are peeve may Cr lensed 10 Incka1S added parse gspats. sake furore petered. edd0arrl spears Pa Swazi Palhp. sanded aMaltrrp Walk r@. 8uah ranaeaeaeele met men i0e"t A Netkeeturel Gerrialyde and realeva A5h1ecasel Redew Camino* ar0 Mchimural Cema1 CeweMlee wawa Leers at!, Apellaedoee. . penerarer asn„urwt traumas ail treaty %Vim aneee Og aroMne Assodal t" our marts max seidMnee aiP lehherHaraua use amasses sawing mishap sGeeea. q en' ani ewe. ctipancns end Ury-Mwda/sn Barters= era are reapA1pltlaa. parr aesemelsr medwrlere. sac. LIBERTY VILI U- PARKING DATA MAK PI.T1AIAN. L ARCA �^tTPMANDESIGN; DM PI,A 28Xa6n, 2-AS-20©9 REY. Mardi R Ma Case # HPC Date Action Request Vote Zoning 2008-49 10/6/2008 Approved 5-0 VC Design review of signage Case People Chauncey Peterson DeMars Signs Inc, Applicant Michael Oreck Liberty Village I LLC, Owner Amy Carr, Owner Address 105 NEW ENGLAND PL #140 2008-50 10/6/2008 CBD Design review of final phase of Maple Island commercial and office space Case People Address Mainstream Development LLC, Owner 225 Main St N Vern Stefan, Applicant 2008-51 11/3/2008 Approved 7-0 RB Demolition of residence and NCD design review of the new single-family home Case People David G Junker, Owner Address 615 St. Louis St 2008-52 11/3/2008 Approved 7-0 BP-C Design review for signage at The Edge Performance Hockey Training Center Case People Matt Doman, Applicant Jim Kron, Owner Address 2510 Curve Crest Blvd 2008-53 11/3/2008 Approved 7-0 CBD Exterior modification to facade Case People Address Marks S Balay Architects, Applicant 232 Main St N Gartner Studios, Owner 2008-54 12/1/2008 Approved 6-0 RB Demolition of garage Case People Christopher Muehleck, Owner Address 1225 4th St S 2008-55 12/1/2008 Approved 6-0 CBD Design review of final phase of Maple Island Development Case People Address Mainstream Development LLC, Owner 227 Main St N Vern Stefan, Applicant Thursday, April 02, 2009 Page 7 of 7