HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-02 HPC Packet
/
~,
c5tillw~ec
~m__'- ~
'HI ilIRI""[,\", Of "'.""I:'O'A ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
Notice of Meeting
Monday, March 2, 2009
The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, March 2/ 2009, in the Council Chambers of
Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF February 2,2009 MINUTES
3. OPEN FORUM The Open Forum is a portion of the Heritage Preservation Commission meeting to
address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Heritage Preservation Commission may
take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of
the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5
minutes or less
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. DESIGN REVIEWS
5.01 Case No. DRj09-07. Design review for two wall mounted signs located at 2050 Market
Drive in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Sign Art, Finn Jacobsen, applicant.
5.02 Case No. DRj09-08. Design review for the construction of a wood deck 13'6" x 12'
located at 150 3rd So in the CBD, Central Business District. Patrick LaCrosse, representing Mike
Rice and Diane Hark, applicant.
5.03 Case No. DRj09-09. Design review for a wall sign (Dairy Queen) located at 132 Main
Street South in the CBD, Central Business District. Paul Williquett, representing Greg Gartner,
applicant.
5.04 Case No. DRj09-10. Design review for a store front sign located at 214 Main Street
South in the CBD, Central Business District. Jill Martin of St Croix Signs, applicant.
5.05 Case No. DRj09-11. Design review for signage located at 14396 60th St N in the
Business Park Commercial District. Signminds, Inc., applicant.
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. OTHER BUSINESS
7.01 Discuss and consider establishing a subcommittee to review the City's demolition ordinance
and a rules on residential building alterations.
8. ADJOURN
,
.
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 2, 2009
Present: Howard Lieberman, Chairperson, Micky Cook, Phil Eastwood, Jeff Johnson, Jerry
Krakowski, Roger Tomten and Scott Zahren
Staff present: Community Development Director Bill Turnblad
Absent: Gayle Hudak
Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Approval of minutes: Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Zahren, moved approval of the minutes of
Jen. 5, 2009. Motion passed unanimously.
OPEN FORUM
Mr. Lieberman invited any comments from the public. No comments were received.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. DRl09-05 A neighborhood conservation district design review for new construction at
702 W. Churchill St. in the RB, Two Family Residential District. HAF Architects, Michael Moon,
applicant.
Michael Hoefler of HAF Architects was present. He showed photos of the streetscape and
neighboring buildings, the proposed elevations of ,the new structure, and other projects and infill
projects in the area. He stated the design picks up the "vocabulary" - narrow lap siding, double-
hung windows, front porch and other Victorian features - from other homes in the immediate
area.
In response to a letter in the agenda packet, Mr. Johnson asked Mr. Hoefler to clarify whether
the new structure will be a single-family home or duplex. Mr. Hoefler said it will be a single-
family residence. Mr. Johnson noted as proposed, there will be no changes to the grading or
footprint of the building, but the square footage of the new structure is increased considerably
from the former structure; he asked how that was accomplished. Mr. Hoefler stated they are
building over the existing foundation, with two stories over the rear portion of the foundation;
some of the increased square footage comes from finishing a portion of the basement, he said.
Mr. Tomten said he thought the detailing of the structure was nice but expressed concern with
the height of the second floor, saying an issue, for him, would be keeping the structure a one
and one-half story residence. He also expressed concern about the height of the windows on
the south elevation. Mr. Johnson agreed that the height of the proposed design is more
representative of a full two-story house, rather than a one and one-half story. Mr. Tomten and
Mr. Johnson suggested that the second floor could be lowered two feet without a significant loss
of usable space. Mr. Hoefler argued that on any street, there are homes of different height; he
said the builder needs some value on the second floor, and said he did not think the proposed
design is oversized at all for the neighborhood. The contractor, Brandon Stryhn, pointed out that
lowering the height of the second floor could impact the bathroom. Mr. Eastwood asked how
much taller the new structure is proposed to be; Mr. Stryhn said the new home will be three feet
taller.
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 2, 2009
Mr. Lieberman expressed his concern with the demolition that has occurred and the failure to
follow proper process. He suggested tabling this case until the Commission receives more
history on what has occurred or not occurred to date. Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing.
Brandon Stryhn, 1375 Pheasant Run, New Richmond, noted this is the first time he has done an
historic project in Stillwater. He reviewed what he had done, stating he had received a building
permit with the intent to save as much of the previous structure as possible. He described the
condition of the structure he found when work began and noted he then received permission to
demolish the rear addition to the structure. He said he has had the same set of plans since the
start of the project. He spoke of efforts he had made to save what he could of the previous
structure. He also stated the situation with this project is affecting his family and crew members
and tabling the case would cause additional stress.
Kevin Kiel, 722 Anderson St. W., spoke in favor of the project. He said he felt the other structure
was about to fall down. He stated there are a lot of houses in the area that look like full two
stories and said the project has lots of neighbor support.
Betsy Glennon, 812 S. Harriet St., spoke favorably of the people working on the project, saying
they are incredibly hard working and have been considerate and cooperative regarding
requests. She said she was happy to hear that no changes are planned to drainage or the
footprint of the structure, expressing a concern about a potential impact on her property should
the drainage be altered. She said she does have respect for historic preservation but noted that
it is too late to go back and reconstruct that property. She said the former property was a hazard
and eyesore and felt this would be an improvement for the neighborhood.
Mr. Lieberman read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Fred Westcott, 918 Harriet St. S., into the record.
The letter indicated the writers were happy to see the former structure taken down but
expressed concern about the new structure being a duplex. Mr. Ueberman again noted that the
new structure will be a single-family residence, not a duplex.
Mr. Lieberman spoke of his sense that process has not been followed in this project. Mr.
Turnblad pointed out that there is a separate enforcement proceeding going on regarding the
demolition. Mr. Lieberman brought the discussion back to the table and ruled that the demolition
issue be removed from the discussion.
There was discussion about lowering the height of the second floor. Mr. Eastwood pointed out
that has a huge difference in salability and suggested there is not that big a difference visually in
the two-story versus one and one-half story. Mr. Zahren expressed his concern about the
process - having design review after the project is essentially complete. Mr. Johnson said he
thought that overall the proposal is a nice design, but he expressed concern about the massing
on a small lot and building that is close to the street. Mr. Johnson also spoke of some
discrepancies in the representation of the front elevation and the scale/position of the windows.
Mr. Tomten read design review guideline No. 12 regarding massing, saying that was his
concern and one that he would have had trouble with whether the design review took place
before demolition or not.
2
'.
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 2, 2009
Mr. Johnson moved approval of Case No. 09-05 as conditioned, with the additional conditions
that the height of the ridge/eave line be lowered by no less than 1.5 feet and that the windows
on the front elevation be narrowed, from 34 to 30, to better fit the profile of the end gable. Mr.
Johnson stated the motion included approval of the details, such as Hardie lap siding and
colors, as presented. Mr. Tomten seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-1, with Mr. Eastwood
voting no,
DESIGN REVIEWS
Case No. DRl09-06 Design review of a non-illuminated wall sign at 350 Main St. N., #106, in the
CBD, Central Business District. Lawrence Signs, applicant.
The applicant was not present. Mr. Tomten asked if the requested sign is larger or smaller than
the allowable square-footage; Mr. Turnblad stated the requested signage is smaller than
allowed by ordinance. Mr. Tomten and Mr. Johnson both suggested that the signage be
narrowed in height and the text elongated to better fill the space. Mr. Tomten also suggested
changing the placement of the sign, bringing the sign out to the edge of the pilaster. Mr. Tomten
submitted a sketch showing the suggested approximate placement. Mr. Tomten, seconded by
Mr. Eastwood, moved approval of the requested signage as conditioned, with the additional
conditions that the height of the sign be approximately 2'2", with the text elongated, and that the
sign be moved to the edge of the structural column as indicated in the submitted sketch. Motion
passed unanimously. It was noted for the record that the sign is to be non-illuminated.
OTHER BUSINESS
· 2009 CLG grant application to the Minnesota Historical Society - A copy of the grant
application was included in the agenda packet. After brief discussion, it was consensus
to recommend that the grant application be submitted.
· Changes to sign regulations in the BP zoning district - A copy of the new regulations
was included in the agenda packet. Mr. Turnblad briefly reviewed the primary changes _
multiple signs are now allowed, but the total allowable square footage has not changed.
Also, the allowable height of free-standing signs is shorter in the district farther off
Highway 36. Mr. Turnblad noted that the impetus for the change was the number of
variance requests received and approved. Rather than continuing to grant variances, he
said it was felt a better approach was to change the ordinance.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Johnson.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
3
.,
,.
. '. ..
-
cSiil~e(
.~: ==- ::,.~.- ~,
! J' f B I R T H PiA (f: (I f t-t; N N r :~ 0 r A. J
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 26, 2009
CASE NO.: 09-07
APPLICANT:
Finn Jacobsen, Sign Art
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed signage change for Sally Beauty Supply
LOCATION:
2050 Market Drive
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
BPC - Business Park Commercial
ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE: March 2, 2009
REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner 'fr;Sf
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval of proposed wall on both the
front and rear sides of the building for Sally Beauty Supply. The signs are proposed to
be individual white channel letters with a small cabinet for the company's logo. The
logo is red, white and black. The front wall sign is proposed to be 16' by 3' for a total of
48 square feet. The rear sign is proposed to be 13' 6" by 2' for a total of 27 square feet.
The total sign area of the proposed signs is 48 square feet on the front and 27 square feet
on the rear. This is larger than the square footage allowed by the ordinance. The
zoning ordinance states that for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may
not exceed one square foot for each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The
applicant's retail space has 20 feet facing Market Drive, which allows a 20 square foot
wall sign on both the front of the building and on the rear of the building facing
Highway 5. The proposed signs will need to be reduced or a variance would need to be
obtained from the Planning Commission.
This site is part of the "Stillwater Marketplace Center" built in 1995. The proposed
signs meets the requirement of the sign plan developed for the site in 1995.
2050 Market Drive
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. The wall signs are to be reduced to 20 square feet or less in size or a variance will
need to be obtained from the Planning Commission to allow the signs to exceed the
allowable square footage. If the signs are reduced in size the new sign plan shall be
reviewed and approved by City Planner.
2. The signs shall be horizontally centered between the signs immediately to the left
and right of the proposed sign.
3. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
4. No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines. By either
reducing the signs to 20 square feet or less or securing a variance the proposed signs
will meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance.
attachments: Applicant's Form
Elevation Drawing
Photo
February 10,2009
City of Stillwater
Attn: Sign permits
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
To Whom It May Concern:
To follow please find a sign permit application as well as a design review application form for
the following location:
Sally Beauty Supply
2050 Market Drive
We are applying for sign permits for 2 wall mounted signs, one at 48 square feet and one at 27
square feet. Also included is a check for the fees.
Thank you for your timely response.
Sincerely,
Finn Jacobsen
Enclosures
Signart Company. Inc.
2170 Dodd Rd
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Phone
651.688.0563
800.699.0563
Fax
651.688.2081
800.588.2081
www.signartusa.com
~iii ~ Ml?) 0 ~... 08 S06t# A11"5 3:~ a: i ~ ~ _ tt i.Hieio1l.'
o ~&no.. G).;::~oo.. ...... ti ... ........... _~_..;;~
a c In r;,; 0: 0 ! ~~ ~:2 ... ~ ~ ~ g;:; ~ N G> '- ~ - ~ '"
fi;iii jii~i 1i;Vs\l ~ ~ ~ d II u ~ Ii ~ t i ~ fillll
'SNDIS sn AS NOISSIWl:I3d N3llll:lM InOHIIM 03ZIl:IOHInlt ION SI 'Wl:IO=' ANIt NIIISIHX3 l:IO 3sn 011H8I1:I 3HI ONIt 'lltSOdOl:ld l:Ino Sit 03lllwsns SI ElNI1:I33NIDN3 ow NElIS30 SI~
w
:!5
w
:c
(.)
(I)
a:
o
.....
o
(.)
'co
-
~ 'co
o -
OlM ~:z
EM 0 (.)
ct:Jo -0> J!!
c.. (Y) ~ ..2 '-" a;
CtlN sct:J Ol-
E~ 'lD - .i ~
.~ E:2.. 1- g. Q) 0
+-"- ~ u ....., CD
"0 >- g E :E..2
~~ a:j"j~ S ct:J
11110
Ol .....
(.) >- -
~ J!! Ctl
Cti .~ 15 t!
15 ui'~ ~ ~
>....(.) ....
o ~ Ctl >. a:
~ .!!2 al ,~ 0
';;: Ol '" -'>I! .....
"o:'2&. (.) 0
Ols><~(.)
.~
I~
"V',Z
"Z,,9
.I~
M1H"L
9NI1SIX3
~
CJlCJl@
ffi~~ 5
~g ;;;
3<
Il:Il:
11I0
QOl
:2:<
;J....
'0
to
N
M
~ II
'0.
-Q!2.
M
Ol
ro
(.)
en
z
o
~
:>
w
.....
w
....
Z
o
a:
~
N
~
N
.;l:
C"
l/,I
=
~
co
o::t
0901 "O',E
.1
I~
(I)
z
o
E:
-0
(.)Cl
i!:.:!
(3iii
w=
a.:;
(I)"fi
.....~
<CCI)
a:1ii
W,5
Z C
w =
c.::I=
en
...
CI)
::;:
.!!
E
::3
c:
'E
::3
'G) ro
c:: "0
= Ol
as _
.&: co
Co) .g Ui
~ .eCl)
$ J!!~
ct:l Ui a. LL.
c:: = Ol ...
'2 ... Ol CI)
..="0::;:
~!b~
..c
'"
'2
ti=
-'>I!
(.)
co
iii
<Ii
....
Ol
c:
-co
-
Ol
....
Ol
(.)
co
-
a.
co
(.)
E
'S::
-
Ol
E Ol
o ~
(.) .:::
s<(~
~ :>-g
-Jco.e
<(:l:Ol
~~-s
,=: e 15
ro Cl a.
(.) .,g S
".5 .!!2 (1)
(.)><~
OlOl-
Dc,S"5
c: 0
<i:';: Ol
, Ol E
if;:g 8
~-;;;s
(.)~
E:;:~
ClOa.. :>-
,=: i3 a.. Ctl
,; ~~ ~
><Ol>-(.)
Q) .c. t-- E
0-:::>
--<(
"COw
~Ea:l
c: o.
" 5 :j:: .=:
g'EEro
',j:l '" Ol (.)
C s..... .c. ";:::
=0)..........,1-
Cl:j::-~~
:E~5(j).!!2
~~
M (.)
-co
>'::0
c: _
.>~
"C _
Ol Ol
~:E
~:l:
OlOl::C
(.) '" e '
't:co &. c '"
::3><0 b
",Ol"C ~
o .... 0 Q)
C) en......... CIJ
E "C-':::>
E -s~i3 ~
~ '~~~ :E
'E .~:l: ~ :l:
~ ~~ ~ E"
"C gSgi::5
~ ~~-:~'~
:g :l: Ol ~,5'E
coQi"t:l-JC:c~
Ui ~ ~ ~ <Ii '$ :5
E~u..Q)~~~~
,S"t:lClEJ::OlClOl
CI) g' ,S!' ~ (.) Cl -
a:b-Ja..oJ!!-J.E
<Ii
..><:
(.)
co
.e
-c
c:
ct:l
'"
c:
....
::3
-
Ol
....
....
Ol
:j::
.!!2
<Ii
b
w
-J
en
- :::>
.c Ol
- -
.~ :E
.~ :l:
~ E"
(.) i:: c
co Cl 0
Q); "';::::;
,1:: as co
~ c::.=:
:l:'- E
"CC::l
Ol-=::=
1::=<<;
Ol ... c:
g,~ ~
o::.3E
-'>I!
(.)
~
.e
~
'"
~
a.
co
(.)
E
M";::
M-
o"t:l
MOl
N....
-'>I!
(.)
co
iii
-""
(.)
co
.e
"t:l
c:
Ctl
c:
....
::l
-
e
=
=
':;
c::
=
Cl
:E
:>-
co
;:
Ol
(.)
e
Ol
c:
'';::;
'"
'x
Ol
o
-
"t:l
Ol
-
c:
::l
o
E
o
Cl
o
-J
~
~
;;:
c
j:
c.
u
CI
u
~
C;
~i I
iu!
...
CJ
I-
:;;:
Cl
c:
'';::;
'"
'~
o
,~
...-co
E ~ E
oS"ii :::II
G.1 - a;
,=~a:
sg.{!:.
1Dc.:t"O
...J E ~
~jEQi
c. 3:
-s T- ~
::I '"
;;: ""
'CI e
'" ::I
1<i c
.! Os
,Q ::I
If cc
1<i
;:;:
E
..
'S
'CI
o
:E
'"
'CI
o
2i
Cl
W
-'
..
...
'"
u..
..
'"
a:
~
...
:E
I-
Co
....
ro
- >-..
"''''0
e",,,,,
~fi~
';; a: "C
c "._
",e;;:
~.s~
...< ~
_ 0
ceo...
o c ...
i;~~
....
jijW
...5
Sil
~~
110
0:E
-'
e
s
...
>-
_ en
'" eo
... .5
~ ~
o
:;:
.. --
CD f!
c; "'
:c c
a. S
CD =
;: ~
~ ~
~
-
CD
=
CD
-'
~
~
~
<
~
..
,
c
<
<
<
!:
~~ ~ M~
o 00"'0-
ii ClCl':; 0:0
i-g~ ~ o~
l~~~~o
~~CI)c:o~
4ft E Ill:t--
~~ ~o.~
g~ 0 u,;
~ .~:gCl~ S06t# A11"5 3;~ a. ~ ~ ac 00 ~
a o"~"i' :i Iii -I N 0 i-
8.-~~~~ i: ~~~ ~ ~ ~ s ~
... 4) c:'''' I ~ 0- . z u:f
~ ~ ~ ~~ I""~ddn,s "'y.Lmf3sS tI ~ 0. ~ ci ~ S ~ ~
.2 g g;::: ~ ~"E & 0 ~ ~ ci Ql ~ ~ ~ <C
~o -:I: 11. ~ ~ ~ 80 Jl", ~ w en 0 .~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::c :i o~c(",c(i:ll!::g:cc c ~ c
'SN~IS so AS NOISSIWH3d N3illHM IOOHIIM 03ZIHOHIO\i ION SI 'WHO::! AN\i NIIISIHlG HO 3S0 OIIH<lIH 3HI ON\i 'l\iSOdOHd HOO S\i a311IWSOS SI <lNIH33NI<lN3 ON\i N<lIS30 SI~
I!!II
W
:a:
W
:c
(.)
CI)
a:
o
....
o
(.)
'(t;
-
~ '(t;
o 1i) U)
e>M '0 C])
..5!~ 0 u
.t:J 6 ~ 0> ~ ..c: .S!
a. ~N ~ ..9 Ci5.(5 .s ~
co !:;.t:J _ - en CO
u~ - - Q) E'::.
E ~ c:i ~ "t:l ~,
-i::~ ~ co Q) 0 $-=
..- "......" CD "'C
'O~ gE:C..5! $=
~:> ai'.5 $.:tJ a:: 1:
IIIID~
,,17-,L "Z ,,9
,.. .IM
t:,
t:,
M
.-
N
b
4=
C"
III
=
=
roo:
N
I.. .1
0801 ,,0 -,Z
~ >-:::!
~ ~ CO ~
~ -;:: ...
~ .~ C]) W
Q) ul~ ~ ....
>....u -
o~co:;"a:
l :~ ~ 9
'O:E2i.uo
Q)$x..S!(.)
.~
~
II
en
~
~
Q)
CO
u
C/)
2
o
~
:>
W
....
W
~
2
o
a:
u..
CI)
2
o
tc ci
(.)=
u::,g
(315
we
a.. ~
CI)"5
...."'C
c(CIl
a:1ti
W .5
25
W::I
c:J=
.c
(I)
'2
l+=
-'"
u
co
00
tn
...
CIl
t:
~
15
e
e
l'Cl
.c
u
"'C
CIl
-
l'Cl
e
's
~
ui
....
Q)
c:
'(t;
-
ui e
-'" Q)
u u
~ ~
"t:l a.
c: C\3
C\3 U
(I) E
c: -c
.... -
.a ~ tJi
e u b
.... co w
Q) ::0 ...J
:j:j C/)
~ .- :=J
E -S .lB
~ .~ :c
'E .~ ~
:::I ~ li
co !;i! i::: c:
'0 .w Cl 0
~ "~.~"~
.g in ~ .5 .~
.aCIl"t:l~.=!
in~f;Q)-=
e a. LI- 1:: = co
.. Q) ... Q) ..
.a~~E~~
~i:nS~S.E
.c
(I)
'2
l+=
-'"
u
C\3
00
a.
C\3
u
E
M-t::
~-
6-0
~ ~
in
e
...
::I
-
CIl
a::
.t:J
~13
- co
:;"::0
c:
d. 'S;
U '0.
C\3 Q) C])
.a ~:E
-g ;r~
C\3 Q)Q)=C
~ ~ ~ ~ tJi
~ ~~5 b
o (l)C])'O ~
en t).s~ CI"J
..5! -o_:=J
E -S~13 .lB
~ .~ ~..S! :c
'E .~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~1l~ li
'0 g.sgi:::5
~ ~ ~:C.2"~
u :c~-;1tic:
-c ;: C1> a; .5 "E
ia i:Ii"t:l ...J c: 5 =.:::1_
- Co) Q) "(t;::I
a.~ 1:: ~'li) = co
~ mco'--E
'O&~Oi~&C])
i:n.3ii:~~.3.E
..c:
-
.~
C\3
'(3
(I)
~
0>
c:
32
';:j
.a
o
-
-gcci
~-(3
c: (I)
:::I C\3
0_
Eo>
>-.!:
co '0
~';:j
u.a
~~
>0..
co$
~a::
u
E!-d
o e
of-! -5
'OC"
~ ~
.. 5 C\3
g'E~
i~~
g~~
:iE5~
=
e
.~
e
::I
Cl
:iE
..c:
-
.~
C\3
'(3
(I)
~
0>
c:
32
';:j
.a
.s cci
'0 '(3
C]) (I)
- co
5-
o 0>
E.!:
>-;:g
C\3 :::I
~..c
Q)~
gl-
a:: 0..
>$
~a::
~-d
E! .~
.sg.
-ge
- (I)
c: co
5 ~
E ~
o Q)
~t)
...J~
N
.
N
~
~
...
~
c
j:
C.
Ll
(j
Ll
C
-
(j
~! i
ii;!
CI
~
::;:
:"
." '1:1 G)
:6S5
~"'W
'E:=!:=
co ~ >
:cmE:"
c: ~c
.s"';: =
16CiS"C
B:;-:
..~'"
Sd;g
"~~~
~~~
~3=
gi-j
:z:~
.c
I-
;;;:
.. ~
c: :g
==
CUe;
'=0:
... c.
:;;f5
....e
~jE
.E.
e'"
::>
;;;:
'C
J2
co
.!
...
co
....
'" ... C G)
E .f:8 'E
=...cv"CI
~ ~~ ~
{a~i~
"CJ 1.&.- C/i
G)_a:aa:
"CI .5 =
~:l1gffi
..w ~: -'
!~
IS~
c:
'e
::>
;;;:
;;;
u:
-Q)(-
~~~ ~
Q'1:I CD"
i~:5 ~
to ::s == I
~~1:'~
"S~ ~~
,g~g-3
c.:I ,.... Cf.) .c
CD)ooC>OU
LU: ca ~
&~ ~ ~
~~~ is
~ c ",..!..
~:;;; ~ c3
.9-eii~
::> :!2
o ..
:;: :;;
--'1:1::1-
!i ~~ ~
~a:;.....
'E===~
~:;;cf <<i
~;:::;;~
:;;~~-a
B;;-=~
..Oc:
-;:2
>.Sc:I
- ..
~~
0'"
~ ~u.I
o
:z:
'"
..
~
'"
'"
a:
...
..
:E
I-
ie
:c.
CO>
-
...
=
~
-
...
....
~
g
".
...
c;
:x:
Co
...
s:
.
<
<
c
9
.
,
c
c
c
C
t
) t.
'j
-jtillwater
~ .._~'"
..""~ ,,---~ .'.::"
-- ,
'ii, BIRfli'lft,Cf, Of Mi""fl'OlA' J
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 26, 2009
CASE NO.: 09-08
APPLICANT:
Patrick LaCasse
OWNER:
Mike Rice and Diane Hark
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed deck
LOCATION:
150 3rd St S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
CC - Community Commercial
ZONING:
CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE:
March 2, 2009
REVIEWERS:
Community Dev. Director
Michel Poggc, City Plarmer ~ '\~
PREPARED BY:
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a 13'611 by 12' deck with a
stone veneer columns with an iron railing. The south end of this building is a
residential unit. The northern two-thirds of the building are commercial! retail users.
The building is located in the Downtown Stillwater Design District; however, it is
outside the core Stillwater Commercial Historic District as listed on the National
Registry of Historic Districts.
The design guidelines provide that new additions should be composed of materials
similar to the original adjacent facades. The use of stone is not in spirit with this
guideline. Additionally, the addition of a deck is inconsistent with the overall building
design and the adjacent units.
The applicant has also applied for a variance to the Planning Commission to allow the
deck to encroach into the required 10-foot side yard setback.
) t.
--
150 3rd St S
Page 2
AL TERNATIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options:
1. Approve the request as presented.
2. Approve the request with condition.
3. Deny the request
4. Continue the request to the October 6, 2008 HPC meeting for more
information. The 60 day decision deadline for the request is October 14, 2008.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the request for being inconsistent with the Downtown
Stillwater Design Guidelines.
If the Commission chooses to approve the project staff would recommend the following
minimum conditions of approval.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. Any lighting fixtures and specifications must be submitted for review by City Staff
before installation. Shielded light fixtures shall be used with appropriate wattage of
light bulbs to be approved by City Staff.
3. All required variance shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the
issuance of a building permit
4. No additional signage.
attachments: Applicant's Form and packet
I.
.t
\.(,/'-'f ,J''''-:
QJf)
Case No: VR}IJ1-ffl
Date.file~
Receipt NOl.: ~ 'l0(/)
Fee:$25a ~
DfSJrGN RIEVJI/EW AIPlP'ILICATION fORM
COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY Of STIllWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms
and sUlpporting material submitted in connection with any application. All
supportung material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application
becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Fourteen (14) copies of aU supporting materials are required.
All follOWing information is required,
, ,PROPERTY IDIENTXFICA TION
Iso So. -3 .Y'r~ -5'1, d((G3 O~() '---i ;;).0 J 03 () I c;" ~;;
Address of Project tv-\Q!(, - R1C ( Assessor's Parcel No.
~ning pi~tri~(~'I3 f~ ' D~s:ZPtion or Project in detail 000 d d'Cc. k. 4r;p{JroX'
/ -) / ~.) ,..:( 1;;2 -- 0 w / -2) I Cl"'k~ ve h~el c::o( LA M'Yl '\ <=t rlp..?_ ~ 1.-....> '('.Au.
-L...{h !L'dd?L~T -T;-r h.,...~ st~ c: 1'0 ,'){ II?'?, I i ev h 1[( ~~ ~d()J/1e - b V () bv-c v", C;'rv\ I VtA
/ y ~
,..-' " ~ ' C-:.L
;:::::') ',r '--T v'r;1 x' ~P;\/;r---~
~ '--" 4 . ~~ J ~i 7~. \ '--""'" J"-'" f ir" ~~
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and
evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if
it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required.
I '~1
Property Owner /V\ \I<j;~:Kl(r< 1/1 f) l~I-JAJ<tRepresentative ya+r( (fc Ul{nS~
Mailing Address i t:J'O ~(j .'5vzl ~t. Mailing Address 22-0 ( Ccdft:[ ~ L h.kU-/
City State Zip ~n II 1/~fA rrJ~:. ['v/lf\l ~t(ity State Zip f~~HtJ~l\(, ViI54!)'&;-
Telephone No. {{?ll 2-1t/} ((j77 n Telephone No. Co12. 4/ L-f - 0504-
.. signatur~d4vA7f? . Signatur;;U~ C71~~
, /
H:\mcnamara\sheila\sheila\design review permit.wpd February 5, 2003
/.
"
OfFICIAL PLAT
COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY NUMBER 320
A CONDOMINIUM
150 SOUTH THIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS
~I
III
III
~I
'"
II n
IIi
II ~
II~
--,\\ \\~
~. II II~
~~ c QGI- ~~ '-\& II ~
~~ ~. eo.- ___\\' ~ ~
d< _- I III~
- \ \6 ~I 1>
- - I I~ ~I
I., ~I
\ I ~ \\\
"~ III
~ III
'" ~I
1 ~I
l' ~I
1" ~I
oz'^
-II
4.11
~t,1I
'",'; II
"'''',11
""-II
II
II
II
~
\1
~I
III
~I
\II
_----, \II
__---- I \ \II
_-~'-~!!-t-- \ III
\ III
~\~\ 60
~ N St 'CORNf:R Gf SECTION 28,
~ 'C. T.3ON., R 20W.. fG\W DRILL
t. *" HOLE: N CG'NC'R:€'TE-
sam'" 1/4 COI</'-ER Of- U' ~
__SE:CTION 25, T.~ON.. R.?OW.,
\ ~~ ";~'~~N;OUNfY ",,- h-~:
, _ J "
....f~-- 1662, 78 -~-,' ,....--- 1015.80 ---, I
~ S89'38'28-W -1- 267347 y~
\......- SoUTH 1.H": OF it-(; SE- QUARTER Of Sf'=CnON 28, r.SON., r<..?ow.
.
SITE PLAN
(AS-BUll TS)
-----,--_. --", \\
...~...-- \ \
~ ...j:--------\-~ \ \
~il5~ _--::-"~~~i _------ I I \
---_:-~-~::_<~~:~::~~:-----~-----~~ .'::- '\_------_\..\
60
\
"
~. "F>-C~ <{~
",nJ,<jJ(I!
e\~""
"
,,-
'~:.
\
\
...:-- --
_\
I"
-
-
I,:,
~s~COl-~~
#~~ ~, y;JJ
(/r'\..O __
-
-
-
~)
,
~--j
~s~~1
d<
-
-
-
-
"'"
'1
I,
'.
I:}
-
-
-
_-/-...----- F>-\..\../-~,{ \..~
_:::;--- ~i ,,,,,,II' "'.\1.0<'<'"
, 1--'\----.~00i~ (fr ?\p-~p-c~
- \ \..fc.? \f;'\~O'J5
. 150.00 ,of{ . \ \)Ii
25'28 ,'-
,-;__>---__ S12' '.'
"oJ '\~/- ....~.
\
\
\ !1_J:)
\
\
v.
I' ,..
Xl?t~W .
~~~
~~
~il5 " e
. 40' 49
N72j50.00
-
,
o
'''"
\ All
~S iA6~",,"
\l1'l\ ;IllG~'
~il5
NORTH
o 20 40
11rly.~~J
DETAil A
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE IN FEET
1 INCH = 20 FEET
\
\
\
\
\------
\
\
\
\
\
\
Y
\
\
\
\
\
\ ---
\'
\
\
\
\
-\
\--
\11
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
\II
I~
I~
I~
"I~
't III
~III
~\l1
~III
~I~
1s1~
"I~
So I~
1,1~
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
___',l\.e.
( \II
I I~
'1'1. \II
~st \\\
~~ \\\
;::,\< I~
~\ \~
~;; I~
~'<;:) \\\
<~ I~
.~~ I~
~ \II
'", I~
III
------- . ~
~,
~ 7&'~ 9'.' )
,,7Z'';O'; .
)
5
)
~)
o
L.CE:
n
BfNCH
M,t.RI'.
This CIC Plat is part O~\h~ I ra\i9n Recorded
as Document Number ~ _8__ on -' ~
this a::L___ day of ____ 20~ A.D,
v.L~
ashington co~Re;:~-;:d;r- .
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, Daniel L Thurmes, do hereby certify that the work was undertaken by or reviewed and approved by me for this COMMON INTEREST
COMMUNITY NUMBER 320, A CONDOMINIUM, 1 SO SOUTH THIRD STREET CONDOMINIUMS, being located upon:
Lots 4, BLOCK 23, of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, and amended by Myron Shepard's Perfected Plat of the City of Stillwater
dated May 31, 1878, Washington County, Minnesota: and
That part of Lot 3, Block 23, of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, and amended by Myron Shepard's Perfected Plat of the City of .
Stillwater dated May 31, 1878, Washington County, Minnesota, lying south of a line drawn from a point on the easterly line of Said Lot 3 a
distance of 20.46 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 3 to a point on the westerly line of said lot 3 a distance of 19.BB feet
southerly of the northwest corner of said Lot 3.
fully and accurately depicts all site plan Information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 5158.2-110,
Dated this JS "day of f2<.'I(~,l (
~!~
, 200k....
Daniel L Thurmes, land Surveyor
Minnesota License No. 257111
STATE OF rn ~~_-b
COUNTY OF J.tA";JHIV~ -n
The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me thIs -'~__ clay of ~....h..r
Thurmes, land Surveyor. .
tn..i/-J. J.t:,;
, 2oo..k, by Daniel L
N;;;'-;Y Publi~ County,_Mwp~
MyCommissi;;;-E;plr;..:L!uL '?oI, 7~/LL
CONNIE J. VILlARI i
No'~~uJ.
~,. lZ*t ..
ARCHlTEcrS CERTIFICATE
I,~~c____, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 51 SB.2-1 OlC, do herby certify that ali structural components and
mechanical systems serving more than 1 unit in ali the buildings containing the units thereby created are substantially completed.
Dated this J~__ day of~, 200~_
~- ~--
YT~..L::,--=__,Architect. Minnesota License No. I~
STATEOF..M#~ I
COUNTYOF_~",-, ~
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this _~ day of ~, 200_fe., by -1H-'5-- ( ,a
licensed Professional Architect.
- ~~ -----~--
Notary Public,l!2!'L.~ County,~~___
My Commission Expires___cll:12..______
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 389.09, Subd. 2, this CIC Plat has been reviewed and approved this _~Z:!'day of PE.~~,
200_~_. _
8~.
_ ".. ,. ","nr~r c-- ~Tl>P:.-
By MJ.Q1A~J~.!!i~_
Washington County Surveyor
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter S 1 S8. 1-116 and Section 272.12, taxes payable for the ye~OO-"- teal e~ate hereinbefore
described, have beelipald, there are no delinquent t:f)~ and~r r has e.en entered thIS _-i-J.:::::. day of U-~__ 200.1-_
.[~-- ~-~ --
ounty Auditor/Treasurer Deputy
F-OR THE: PURPOSES Of Tt-iS PLAT, HE- SO\Jrt*RL y
LItE Of Lor 4, 8LOCI:::. 13, MYRON SH:PAI<OS
Pf:R:F-ECTED PLAT Of TrE: Ol'!' OF SlLLWAfE:R IS
AS~O TO B€"AR SOUTH 72 O~C;:RH.S '25 MNUH:S
26 seCO><JS ..."Sf.
LAND SURVEYING, INC
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
i---
I
I
~:I: ,
l<l=
~ ---
(NOTTOso.u;l cs...t-l Q
"'''Sf NYRlU SfRlXf
I
I
L___
Svit0#8100
200 East Chesb1ut stroot
Stillwslef. MN 55062
Phone 651.:27~.6969
Fax 651.275.8976
dlt_
mdeod....
.nol
~ ,\"
DtNQTE:S 5E:T HALf NCH RON PIPE: ~NT MARKE:O RLS '25716
~tKJf~S t..M1W C~ E:t...~NT
DENOTES COf't1Ot~ flEf'ENi
INTERIOR ot'Etl$IONS SHOW'N ARE ME-ASlJQEO TO THE:
F-t.l*O SURF-ACf: Of THE WALLS, CElNCS, AJ'.V fLOORS
TOP 1'.U1 HYDRANT ~ IS LOCArw ALOt-JC THE EASrERLY
SVf OF- SCUft-l lrtRD STRf:H
Elf:VATIOtJ = 741.27 H;fT (NeVa ]'\2<l)
,I'
",-'
+
CORr\] ERSTON E
Loon
-::-.+- ,...-- r 1 I .
) J , r.. yo ()(
--- ,
_~;rc:;(.{--
'.
~-_._--_._-------~.._._._-_._._---_.__.
~/). } .
I~ I I VI .?~
--./
,I
~
\J
\/1
. .~ L.l,..J
~'-(~~ r
r I. I
"uu
~ "(~ I
i'V<-'C:/
;Cda I
p~\0 I
li'-: 1C4'1 I
B/Llfr--~I~j~\
".1 _.__. ".. ___ _ _
l
II
ill
-Ii
.1
I
I--
/'1
,
'. ....
I _~'~J '..~' ('.,71
i
1/
. .. . -- "
/)
"
~'
~ ......""
1'9'''
I
,
,
,/'-' .,---~-
I
I@
I
I
[ ..
..._ .,.___t.___Qyer ~\~t\J D::o'C~__L_ _ _ ____ __,.__
... .
~,-I!. 1..
/' ,t ~ I '\ Ala ~ ~ r
fili v"~t~
--.-- -- - ~~J'
"'f~[J' ,.,',,,,,,,0', ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 26, 2009
CASE NO.: 09-09
APPLICANT:
Paul Williquett
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed signage for DQ
LOCATION:
132 Main St S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
CC - Community Commercial
ZONING: CBD - Central Business Dish-ict
HPC DATE: March 2, 2009
REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a wall sign for DQ
Grill & Chill at 132 Main St S. The plans show that the sign will be 180-inches (15 feet)
by 29-inches (2 foot 5 inches) for a total of 36.25 square feet. The sign is proposed to
contain the DQ logo with the words "Grill & Chill". The logo is red, blue, and orange
with DQ letters in white. The words Grill Chill are white with the ampersand red in
color. All of the letter and ampersand will flat cut out aluminum letter that will stand
off the sign approximately % inch. The sign is not proposed to be illuminated.
For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The sign ordinance states
building signs in the CBD '... may have an aggregate area not exceeding one square foot
for each foot of building face...'. The applicant's retail space facing Main Street is
approximately 67 feet long. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 36.25 square feet,
which is smaller than the square footage allowed by the ordinance.
126 Main St S
Page 2
Related to "trademark logos" the design guidelines state that they "may not be
acceptable if the color and character of the sign is not in keeping with the historic
character of the area". The Commission should review and discuss if the proposed sign
meets this guideline.
Staff would note that the image supplied by the applicant is smaller than what is
described in the application. As a condition of approval staff would recommend the
sign be limited to the size of 15 feet by 2 feet 5 inches as shown on the sign plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. The surface of the sign must not exceed 15 feet by 2 foot-5 inches from edge to edge.
3. No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets
the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual.
attachments: Applicant's Form
Drawing/ photo of the proposed sign
":>7'
Case No: D 72-1 oq log
Date Filed: '~) I sWf
Receipt No.: '<J.do7!
Fee: $25.00 ?':Ick 7~
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNIlY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches
and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen
(14) copies of all supporting materials is required.
After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a lO-day appeal period. Once the lO-day
appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must
be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is reauired ,
PROPERTYIDENTIRCATION
Address of Project / 3:).. Mal~ S+-.S Assessor's Parcel No. J ~ O~ D J. at( I b ()o ~
Zoning District <.: (3]) Description of Project in detail
'vJALL ~1'!1-V\ (:.of fVt(;l~l\. '?~ f~-0wV\L~
U (<;.e e Ct:4+- a. (~L{ t-h evv+<; )
'T hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be troe
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is reauired.
Property Owner i.::;~~b I1rrn-e " Representatwe /l9u I wi/lii!iJU df
Mailing Address ~)O W,}1 '/yf-l<i(. ')'1, Mailing Address <...5S)" C! c>, I<'&'. E
CityStateZip 51;/!uJ'4.,;I"/!1j1f". (',u;fj..CitYStateZiP/ktOS't'Jf1/ 11/;' SV[)/~
Telephone No. hS/- 3SI- ?700 Telephone No, ft,J! - '!~ 9~:3,? 7
S:\Planning\design review permitwpd
April 12, 2002
180.00 in
101.00in
29.00 in 24.00 i
1 :3.8 in
&([;[}uo
I hove verified the accuracy of colors, layout, quantities,
sizes, spelling, & wording. I hereby authorize release to
Production according to this approved submittal.
APPROVED
AS IS:
-1 "Pan
11 2" Reverse Channel
1/4" FCO Letters
25.00 in
Drawing Dote: 02.16.09 I Rev
Customer: Sh11waler Dairy Queen
Order #: 14754
Project Mngr. Greg Rendo"
Designer. Korey MtDermolf
R1eLoc: o J..Z 0 Transfer 0 Ko
Fda Name: Stdlwater Dairy Queen.oi
Sign Type: Reverse Channels wi Fro left<
Size I: See layout
Size 2:
Font 1:
Font 2: .
Fon13: .
Color @ TBD
---
Color ([) .
- -
CoIGr@.
---... -
Color @ .
(
'--
,-
\-
C
l_
~II'
Pllff. .
Pllff f) -
Port" .
Port. -
Port" -
Pllff. -
Pari. .
--- .~-_...
Port. .
-
x.
ISiGN~~
7660 Quoltro Drive. (bonhosseR, MN ~
Phone: 952.908.9127 · Fax: 952.908
www.sign-soufce.com
- -- - r-- -- - - -
, PRODUCTION Will NOT BEGIN UNTIL
/.t
SIGNED APPROVAL IS FAXED BACI(
, It
PLEASE CHANGE
AND RESUBMIT:
This drflwing is the property of SignSo
AlIf(lctCl, In(, C1nd mClY not be used, repr
01 disclosed without wrillen Guthorizution
'"
t.
1V 17'-4" l'
----C
/= ( , -
9 , )( ~'-I"""\ 0
N - ~" ,
N
8'-7" ./
-- .-
- ,..- - ,..- - - - -
!:::: ~ == ~ = !:::: = =
9
-
..-
l'
, t:!
9
4'-0" 4....011 4'-0" Co
t " ~'-O"
=
== M lIB. .E3 IE3. E. ~I E. SI
~
-+-' 0
co
Q) w
~ z
0 .-J Q) Z
4- .-J I- ':;
~ - -+-'
c I if)
OJ U
E
OJ C
>
0 0 .-
0. Z 0
E <( :2
'D
0 .-J
.!: ..c
OJ .-J
if) -+-'
0 -
OJ a:: :::J
...J C) 0
c if)
0
c ON
c '"
OJ w
f- On !;(
~
.,-- .J
;:::
if)
i1i.!l 0
~ ~~ ~~-
~ ~~ !~ :
tO~" iii" -
~ t>i] =1e .,
~ ~~ ~~ ~
>-
GJ8
--' "
"
<< ~
CD
.!
g .
~ E
~ ~
,c
~
J
21''''T'
J
J
2~'-o"
}
is
"" w
~~~
.. ""'0
p
iB
EAST ELEVA TIOI\I
~~
.-<
>~
w-<
"'0
('0 w.RK s.. B.l..!.AY ,l.IlCHlTrC1S, 200:1
"'''''
eu:VMONS
W1
.
Vvat(~r
- -- ._~~
'!f, BIH 'II", ,'(f' f1' /,',N"I'01' 'j
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 25, 2009
CASE NO.: 09-10
APPLICANT:
Carol Sudheimer
PROPERTY OWNER:
Michael Lynskey
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed signage for Our Shops
LOCATION:
214 Main St S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
CC - Community Commercial
ZONING:
CBD - Central Business District
HPC DATE:
March 2, 2009
REVIEWERS:
Community Dev. Director
Michel Pogge, City Planner ~r
PREPARED BY:
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to install a projecting sign for
Our Shop at 214 Main St S. The proposed sign face is 24-inches by 36-inches for a total
of 6 square feet. A 2S-inches by 40-inches frame will extend around the sign face. The
sign is proposed to contain the words "Our Shop" with a silhouette of a person, The
lettering is proposed to be dark red, with a gray silhouette on a cream background.
For retail storefront signs the Commercial Historic District Design Manual provides the
size of signs shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance allows
projecting signs of up to six square feet in size. Staff did not count the sign frame
toward to the total area. The total sign of the sign face is 6 square feet meets the
requirements of the zoning ordinance.
21,4 Main St N
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. The bottom of the project must be a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk.
3, No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposal meets
the intent of the Commercial Historic District Design Manual.
attachments: Applicant's Form
Drawing/photo of the proposed sign
Case No: Pr DrJ-fO
Date Filed:
Receipt No.: 3::5 7!J3
Fee: $25.00
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches
and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen
(14) copies of all supporting materials is required.
After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day
appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must
be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is reauired.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICA TION
Address of Projectz/4 SOt ma.; (J Assessor's Parcel No, R Zg~ 030., 20. 4/ , OQ'50
Zoning DistrictC..jS D
Description of Project in detail '31Or-e. F-u"~\S; 5;'1
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my kno wledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I wI71 comply with the permit if it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's si nat~re is re uire . ? SII J
Property Ow ner fl1 ichil-e-I ,3, Lj T\':, 1< "'j s\2. 'Representatill m u A-' m~ ~
Mailing AddressJj?; So. mClI () ST. Mailing Address 5GLm -€-- · ~
City State Zip stt\ \ uJ (tfe (' I m AJ 55()g LCity State Zip t 1
Telephone No. &5(-lf81- J Lj I z.. Telephone No. I )
S:\Planning\design review permit.wpd
April 12, 2002
~
-.----
AutoCruZin / St Croix Sign
15207 N 63rd St., Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 206-8025 tc@stcroixsign.com
www.AutoCruZin.com / www.StCroixSign.com
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 26, 2009
CASE NO.: 09-11
APPLICANT:
Signminds Inc
REQUEST:
Design Review of signage for O'Reilly Auto Parts Store
LOCATION:
14396 60th St N
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
BPC - Business Park Commercial
ZONING:
BP-C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE:
March 2, 2009
REVIEWERS:
Community Dev. Director
Michel Pogge, City Planner l\II{O
PREPARED BY:
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to replace the existing
Checker's Auto Part signs with new signage for O'Reilly Auto Park Store. The request
is to replace a sign face on the existing 25 foot tall pylon sign and replace the existing
wall sign.
Pylon Sign
The sign face on the pylon sign is 9'10" by 5'1" for a total of 50 square feet with is the
same as the Checker's sign. The background of the sign will be red with the text
"O'Reilly" in green with a white outline. The words" Auto Parts" will be in white.
Freestanding signs in the BP-C zoning district are allowed to be 100 square feet in size
and no taller than 25 feet in height. A variance was granted in 1990 (Planning Case
1990-24) allowing a 30 foot tall freestanding sign on this site.
14396 60th St N
Page 2
Wall Sign
The current sign Checker's sign is a 4'6" by 33'9" cabinet style sign for a total of 151.875
square feet in size. The new O'Reilly sign is proposed to contain "O'Reilly" in a single
channel style sign. The O'Reilly sign will be 4'1" by 10'6" for a total of 42.875 square
feet. The text "O'Reilly" in green with a white outline. The words" Auto Parts" are
proposed to be individual white channel letters. The letters are I' 11.25" tall and run for
14' 10.75" for a total of 28.8 square feet. The entire sign measures 71.675 square feet in
size. A variance was granted in 1999 (Case 1999-27) allowing up to 151.875 square feet
of signage for this bay with the approval of the Checker's sign. The proposed sign
meets this allowance.
This site is part of the "River Heights Auto Mall" built in 1990. The proposed signs
meets the requirement of the sign plan developed for the site in 1990. The proposed
sign meets the requirements of the code and the approved variances.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposed sign meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance and approved
. variance 1990-24 and 1999-27. The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park
Design Manual.
attachments: Applicant's Form
Drawing/ photo of the proposed sign
Feb 17 09 10:16a
FEB,-1E>-2009 22:07
Marco Mgmt
651-766-5721
p. 1
P.02/02
Case NO: V
Date Filed:
Receipt No.: ..f-
ree: $25.00 '-
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICAnONfORM
COMMlJNlTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARlMENT
em OF STD..LWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
SllLLWA 1ER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the mmpleteness and accuracy of aU forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketmes
and a letter of intent is required. An supporting material (i.e. photos, sketdles, etc.)
submitted with application beoomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen
(14) copies of aU supporting materials is required.
After Heritage Preservation approva~ there is alO-day appeal period. Once the to-day
appeal period has ended, the applicant will rec8ve a design review pennit which must
be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required bUilding permits.
All following information is required.
PROPERTY IDENTlfICA TION
Address of Project~ 3lfc. N. ~o+h Assessors Parcel No. 6;D3oJD 3lf-ro 10
Zoning District ff-G Descf1)tion of Project in detail ?\P{Y10V~ /2/1f'.pYer
eO~~~~0~nd R~\~u l0~1,-hO'~
"1 hereby state the foregoing .statements and aU data" infonnation and evidence
submitted herewith in aU respects, to the best of my knowledge and be~ to be troe
and correct. I further certify r will rompty with the permit if it is granted and usee/'"
If representactnot p p y _then property owners signature is reouired.
Property owner~ Representative S, J'" 01 ~ r\d s tr..L ___
t\\u.)~ - I r-- (I A I
Mailing Address ~ /3"1."'1 No .;n K. . A I~ II 1 Mailng Address Ll(.o 0 ULLt.( II') r..y \.' Nt:
City State Zip ~ ~C\~ n mfl, 550 13 City State Zip Mfls r.\i0 .5S'L/13
Telephone No. L,i) j-tnJ-;:;:l.t:t(') Telephone No. (..J I ~ -7L;7~<O 3lCO
S'IPIl>noingld'Sl9n 1~~eW Pt'rmit.\'o1l~
AIlril.12.2oo2
TOTAL P.02
.r~,
r ---- ~--
I~
I ~c:
[;) --io'
I .~ ::-
~ ~. ~
~o
s~
I""'!~
i:<
~. m
....J
~~
ffiZ
::;i .
m _.
~--I
rom
~Ci)
m.,.,
u ,.."
m --
~- -1
-<
.....---
~
I
c} t...,
to;:':""
.
~ -
.;.-
~-
r
J'
< ,
t--t",,-' 'I.,,~ _~
..
()
0
:3
Q:
:J
(!)
D-
:J
D-
<
Ci
c
OJ +:>.
'< \0
::
(!) q,
:J
< ;;Om
(!) ffi. 0
0'
v '<
(!) -.
0.. n t,:
0:
0 :;
'-J C
0 D-
.
\0
0:>
U1
Vl
..Cl
;::p
r-~I
.... j.J
G\ "'
~
I ~
.,.
5
l
I-'
!"
(J) t!
U1 If)
lJ1 ~ .p
r
m ---..., ;J
0 ~
N J
w
n
::J" I-"
OJ ~
:J I"-'
:J f-4 ....
CD 0 I'
w r
, ---...,- s.:J
~ OJ
rt
CD
...,
)> SJ
-0
I I-"
S l"
.- en
Q)
....." If)
.p
~ ;J
~
tv
(X)
'-J
U1
(f)
..Cl
-n
H"