HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-03-03 HPC Packet
(5ii I lvyateL
~-_. - . '. ~
, '" "' Pol I! f' I " ,:; CI I "', ei " l , 0 : A ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
Notice of Meeting
Monday, March 3, 200B
The regular meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, March 3, 200B, in the Fire Department
Training Room of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
1. CALL TO ORDER
AGENDA
2. APPROVAL OF February 4, 200B MINUTES
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
3.01 DEM/OB-07. Demolition request of an addition to a single family residence located at 724
Fourth Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. David and Joan Fazendin,
applicants
3.02 DEM/OB-OB. Demolition request for a garage located at 1104 3rd St South in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. Adam Johnston, applicant.
4. NEW BUSINESS
5. DESIGN REVIEWS
5.01 Case No. DR/OB-04. Design review of the installation of a screen to cover cooling
equipment located at 200 East Chestnut Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Oliver
Vrambout, applicant.
5.02 Case No. DR/OB-09. Design review of signage located at 1851 Market Drive in the BP-
C Business Park Commercial District. Nordquist Sign Company, applicant.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
6.01 Parking Ramp Facade
7. ADJOURN
1
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 4, 2008
Present: Howard Lieberman, Chairperson, Phil Eastwood, Gayle Hudak, Jeff Johnson, Roger
Tomten and Scott Zahren
Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge
Absent: Larry Nelson
Mr. Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Approval of minutes: Mr. Zahren, seconded by Ms. Hudak, moved approval of the minutes of
Jan. 7,2008. Motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. DEM/08-02 Demolition request for a single-family residence at 1905 N. Second St. in
the RA, Single Family Residential District. Boyd Knudsen, applicant.
The applicant was present. Mr. Lieberman noted this case had been continued from the January
meeting as the Commission felt the applicant had not met the requirements of the demolition
ordinance regarding proof of advertising the structure for sale and detailed cost estimates for
rehabilitating the structure. At that meeting, the Commission asked that the applicant consider
saving and utilizing the original, front portion, of the existing structure in any new building
constructed on the site. During discussion, it was noted the applicant had submitted the required
proof of advertisement and additional cost estimates.
Mr. Johnson noted that in the previous discussion, the Commission had challenged Mr.
Knudsen to look at the possibility of saving the front portion of the structure. The revised sketch
submitted by Mr. Knudsen moves the front portion back and shows a rectangular, gabled
addition, Mr. Johnson pointed out. The plans also indicate the roof would be raised to gain a
second story. Mr. Knudsen spoke of the difficulty of working within the perimeters of the original
portion of the structure. Mr. Johnson said, ideally, the Commission would prefer to see the
original portion of the house kept forward, with the new addition behind it, and a plan that
incorporates some of the elements, the original fabric of the house. Mr. Tomten asked Mr.
Knudsen if he had looked at options for keeping the massing and shape of the existing structure
in order to retain the character of the streetscape, as well as keeping the addition primarily back
of the original house.
Mr. Johnson asked about plans for the outbuildings. Mr. Knudsen said the barn would be
demolished, but the garage and one of the outhouses retained. Mr. Johnson pointed out there is
a five-sided window in the garage and at the back of the house. Mr. Knudsen noted the garage
is right on the lot line; Commission members noted that Mr. Knudsen would have to obtain a
variance from the Planning Commission to deal with that issue. Mr. Eastwood asked what type
of siding might be used. Mr. Knudsen stated cedar or hard plank siding would be utilized; Mr.
Johnson suggested a narrower lap siding be used. Mr. Tomten asked if the corner boards and
trim would be similar to the adjacent house; Mr. Knudsen responded in the affirmative.
Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was
closed. Mr. Lieberman suggested the Commission might want to consider granting a provisional
1
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 4, 2008
demolition permit and granting the final permit following review of more detailed design plans for
a new structure to make sure the plans are consistent with the infill guidelines. Mr. Johnson
moved to allow demolition of the two additions on the back of the existing house, everything but
the front cross-gabled section of the original structure, with the applicant to submit final design
plans to the HPC for review. Mr. Lieberman seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously.
DESIGN REVIEWS
Case No. DR/08-05 Design review of installation of a new exhaust fan at 305 S. Water St. in the
Central Business District. Larry McGough and Bob Sabes, applicants.
Representing the applicants were John Daley, Jason Rich and Brian Rich, Rich Bros.
Construction.
There was a question about the proposed location of the new vent; Jason Rich reviewed the
location. Mr. Johnson pointed out that no roof penetrations are visible from the River side of the
building, and from the alley side of the building, it is difficult to see what's on the roof. There was
a question about a staff comment in the written report related to painting the vents. Mr. Pogge
stated that was included only to indicate staff's preference for painting, rather than screening,
should the HPC think additional treatment is necessary. Mr. Pogge said staff does not believe
any additional treatment is necessary, as the venting is not visible from Main Street or the River
side of the building.
Mr. Tomten asked if there was an OSHA requirement for a railing around some of the units. Mr.
Rich explained that is for serviceability. Mr. Tomten suggested that it would be nice if the existed
railing were replaced with more of a landscaping-type railing to match what is proposed for the
new unit. Mr. Johnson said it would be good if existing roof penetrations that are no longer used,
such as electric service hoods, be removed and capped close to or below roofline. Mr. Daley
said Mr. Tomen's suggestion regarding the railing and Mr, Johnson's suggestion about
removing non-used venting could be included in the project.
Mr. Johnson moved to approve the request as submitted, not requiring painting of the venting,
with the conditions that the existing safety railing be replaced to match the new railing and that
the four existing electrical service entrance hoods be removed. Mr. Eastwood seconded the
motion; motion passed unanimously.
Case No. DR/08-06 Design review of exterior modifications for an accessory dwelling unit at
522 W. Oak St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential District. Mark Balay, representing Karl
Diekman, applicant.
Mr. Diekman and Mr. Balay were present. Mr. Lieberman briefly reviewed the request and
proposed changes to the accessory dwelling unit:: adding new doors on the west elevation
facing the main house; restoring or replacing porch windows when restoration is not possible;
adding skylight windows to make a greenhouse area; re-roofing the structure; removing an
existing sidewalk; replacing existing garage doors; and painting the structure.
Mr. Johnson noted there would be no change in the footprint of the structure, all changes are
within the perimeter of the building. Mr. Balay stated the Planning Commission wants to
2
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 4, 2008
reinforce the sense that this is an accessory building, which is the reason for removing/changing
the door openings; he said they also plan to add a wrought iron fence across the front of the
property, as well as remove the existing sidewalk. Mr. Salay explained that if windows have to
be replaced, they would go to a standard size and glider-style window. He also said the intent is
to remove the existing aluminum siding on the structure; depending on the condition, the original
siding will be utilized or replaced with a similar material. He noted the HPC is not being asked to
approve of a color at this time. Mr. Johnson said he thought removing the existing entry door
and carrying windows across the front elevation would improve the appearance from the street.
Mr. Lieberman moved to approve Case No. DR/08-06 as submitted and conditioned - that all
revisions to approved plan be reviewed and approved by the HPC and that exterior paint colors
be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Mr. Zahren seconded the motion; motion
passed unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Downtown parking ramp fayade concepts - Community Development Director Bill Turnblad
provided a brief history of the parking ramp and project update. He said at this point, LSA is
putting together a "firm estimate" of the project cost and has started working with fayade
concepts, which the HPC is being asked to review at this point. Once a preferred fayade
concept is selected, LSA would make formal application and come back to the HPC, he said.
Representing LSA were Mike Shrock, Catherine Mullinax-Jones, and Bob Mack, of McDonald
and Mack, historical preservation issues consultants. Mr. Shrock briefly reviewed the preferred
site and two fayade concepts, one incorporating a Main Street fayade and another the tower
elements of the site neighborhood. He said the proposed parking ramp would be three levels.
He said the plans incorporate a pedestrian path from Third to Second streets; the path crosses
a "bridge" from Third to the top level of the parking ramp. He said LSA had talked with Trinity
Church, the Lowell Inn and the State Historical Preservation Office (SHPO) regarding the
concept plans. Later in the discussion, he stated that due to cost issues, one of the bays may be
eliminated, which would provide more flexibility of design.
Ms. Mullinax-Jones explained that while SHPO has no jurisdiction in this matter, that agency
does have an opinion. She stated SHPO felt the Main Street fayade might not be appropriate at
this site and felt the tower concept spoke more to the neighborhood. Mr. Mack pointed out that
because of its location in the Historic Downtown District, the plans must meet Department of
Interior standards; to meet those standards, he said plans should not be faux old, but still fit
within the context of the historic district. He said from their standpoint, the tower concept fits
best, too, but noted the concept is subject to refinement.
Mr. Johnson asked about the possibility of retail space on the first level. Mr. Turnblad explained
that the if more than 10 percent of the space is for private use, it impacts the amount of TIF
funding that is available, so the thought of providing some retail space has been abandoned.
Mr. Eastwood said he thought the Main Street fayade was more appropriate. Mr. Mack pointed
out that there was never any building of that style on the block where the ramp is to be located.
Mr. Johnson agreed that the massing of the buildings on this block, such as the WR Medical
building, are different and the smaller storefront fayade not appropriate, but he said he liked
some features of the Main Street fayade, suggesting that some of the spaces be eliminated to
3
.'
"
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 4, 2008
be more consistent with the massing of the nearby buildings. Mr. Lieberman stated he did not
like either of the concept facades, saying the tower fa<;ade proclaims that this is a parking ramp.
Mr. Lieberman agreed with Mr. Johnson's comments and suggestion about modifying the Main
Street fa<;ade to provide more of a warehouse feel to it. Ms. Hudak agreed that the tower fa<;ade
looks like a parking ramp. Mr. Johnson expressed a concern about the view of the structure
from Third Street in relation to the tower fa<;ade, looking at the back side of a church steeple.
Mr. Tomten asked about the amount of space from the structure to the street. It was noted that
the structure, in this preliminary concept, is in line with the main fa<;ade of the Lowell Inn, so
there is more than 16 feet from the structure to the street. Mr. T omten spoke in favor of keeping
street use on the street and keeping options regarding retail space open for the future. He said it
would be nice to have a three-dimensional view of the structure, and he questioned having the
tallest part of the structure next to the Lowell Inn. Mr. Tomten asked whether there would be
some kind of green space. Mr. Shrock explained that there will be a pedestrian connection and
a path from Trinity Church to the third level, and he spoke of the possibility of having some type
of green space near the bridge from Third Street to the top level of the ramp. Mr. Tomten asked
about material finishes. Mr. Shrock said the front elevation and the towers would be brick;
however due to cost considerations, the other elevations would be primarily colored concrete.
Mr. Johnson reiterated his concern about views from Third Street and suggested the possibility
of perhaps increasing the wall on the west elevation to shield the view of some of the vehicles.
There was discussion about access to the small park by the Rivertown Commons and the
feasibility of incorporating a water feature utilizing the stream that flows through the site. Mr.
Johnson asked about the talked-about connection to the Lowell Inn; Mr. Shrock stated the
Lowell Inn owner's priority is space in the ramp. Mr. Johnson asked if there were plans to
stabilize slopes; Mr. Shrock stated civil engineers are not involved at this point.
Mr. Johnson summarized comments by saying the Commission does not favor a pointed roof
element and would like more vertical orientation of the structure that is shown in the storefront
fa<;ade, but with larger openings and massing reminiscent of the WR Medical building geometry.
Mr. Tomten urged the design team to reinforce the pedestrian connection and breakup the
rooftop connection.
CLG qrant application to SHPO - Mr. Pogge asked for Commission approval of the Certified
Local Government grant application for the second phase of the Heirloom Homes and
Landmark Sites project. He noted that due to the number of homes and sites involved, the
project has been expanded to a four-phase program, rather than three phases. Mr. Johnson,
seconded by Mr. Eastwood, moved to approve the grant application as submitted; motion
passed unanimously.
Other items:
· Mr. Johnson pointed out that street reconstruction will be taking place in the
Conservation District. He suggested that this is an opportunity to identify the District as
an historic district. He noted there are several ways to identify the District, through
streets signs, lighting and other means. He suggested the possibility of changing the
shape of the curb in the upcoming street project. Mr. Pogge said City Engineer Shawn
Sanders will be at the next HPC meeting to discuss the issue.
4
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
February 4, 2008
· Mr. Pogge distributed copies of two pamphlets prepared by the 106 Group, one which
provides information on rehabilitating an historic home and the other which explains the
Heirloom Home program. He said additional information will be available on the web site.
Mr. Pogge stated the pamphlets are first versions, and welcomed comments from
members as to other information they would like to see included.
· Mr. Lieberman stated that due to professional commitments, he is contemplating
stepping down from the Commission. He invited members to share their thoughts on that
possibility with him.
Meeting was adjourned at 9 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Tomten, second by Mr. Lieberman.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary
5
..
r
City of Stillwater
Joint Meeting
of
Heritage Preservation Commission
Parking Ramp Steering Committee
February 21, 2008
Present: Heritage Preservation Commission members Chairman Howard Lieberman, Phil Eastwood,
Jeff Johnson and Roger Tomten,
Parking Ramp Steering Committee members: Mark Salay, Jim Christopherson, representing Ascension
Episcopal Church, and Mike Holsten, representing Trinity Lutheran Church
Staff present: Community Development Director Sill Turnblad
Representing LSA Architects were Mike Schrock and Catherina Mullinax-Jones.
As there was a quorum of Heritage Preservation Commission members, Chair Lieberman called the
meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Mr. Turnblad gave a brief introduction. He noted that the two facades presented for input at this
meeting included revisions based on comments received at the last Heritage Preservation Commission.
Mr. Schrock agreed that they had received strong direction from the HPC. Mr. Schrock briefly reviewed
the project. The ramp will be a three level structure, with entry on Second Street and bridge from Third
Street to the top level of the ramp. He stated they have a better idea of the budget and the number of
parking spaces. Mr. Schrock noted that they are working with a very tight budget. He stated at this
point, the ramp will have 314 parking spots, about a 212 space net gain from the current 104 public
parking spots in the area. Later in the discussion, Mr. Turnblad pointed out that the City does not have
total control of the existing 104 public spaces, so the net gain is actually greater than 212.
There was a question about the budget. Mr. Schrock said they are working with a budget of $5.3
million, a construction budget of $4.4 million. Mr. Turnblad pointed out that the bond consultants will be
doing another forecast, noting that the interest rate on borrowed money is good at this time; he stated
construction bids also are very good at this time. Mr. Schrock stated that given the budget, the exterior
fa<;:ade won't be wrapped around all four sides; however, he said it is anticipated that brick will be used
on the spandrels on all four sides. He showed a photo of the level of finish that likely will be similar to
this ramp.
Mr. Schrock reviewed the two facades developed based on the HPC comments. Members were in
consensus favoring option 3. Mr. Lieberman said he was most comfortable with option 3, saying he
thought option 4 was too ornate and he did not like the two anchors. Mr. Eastwood agreed in favoring
option 3, saying his main concern was with the detailing on the side elevations that can be viewed by
the public. Mr. Salay also spoke in favor of option 3, but noted it was difficult to transition from the
higher to the lower piece of that design. Mr. Johnson suggested the top parapet of the middle section
could be raised slightly to help with the transition. Mr. Christopherson also spoke in favor of option 3,
but wondered if cars would be visible from below (Second Street); Mr. Schrock said cars should not be
visible.
There was discussion about the rear elevation and the view from Third Street. Mr. Schrock said they
are looking at ways of screening cars parked on the top elevation. Mr. Johnson asked about pedestrian
travel. Mr. Schrock said they have talked with Trinity Church about having a small bay of green area of
the top level and some type of pathway from the bridge with texture change to make the pathway
obvious to pedestrians. It was suggested to treat the entire driving lane as a pedestrian space, perhaps
with colored concrete, to better identify it as a primary entry. Members also suggested keeping the
~
Heritage Preservation Commission
Parking Ramp Steering Committee
February 21, 2008
triangle parking area on Third Street to the south of the site as green space; Mr. Schrock said that is an
option favored by Trinity Church. Mr. Johnson pointed out there is an area on Third Street that is
starting to slide and wondered if there was any remedial action planned; Mr. Schrock said that
information has been passed along to the structural engineers, but they have received any additional
information back at this point.
Mr. Johnson asked about lighting. Mr. Schrock explained lighting would be on columns along Second
Street. He said they are wrestling with lighting on the top elevation and said it likely will be directional
lighting from the parapet projecting east. Mr. Tomten asked if any thought had been given to the view of
the structure at the terminus of Commercial Street, suggesting that anything that could identify the
structure looking up Commercial would be good. Members said they thought having the entrance offset
from the end of Commercial would help slow down traffic; Mr. Salay suggested shifting the exit panel
might address Mr. Tomten's concern. Mr. Johnson said a massing diagram would be helpful to
determine how the structure will affect the viewsheds
There was discussion of the stairways in the tower elements. Mr. Salay suggested there should be less
vertical element in the north stair tower. Mr. Johnson suggested rotating the stairs 90 degrees; Mr.
Johnson also suggested having the stairs look like fire escape stairs to enhance the look of a
commercial building.
Mr. Tomten asked if there were any details regarding landscape plans. Mr. Schrock said there will be
significant landscaping in front of the structure and a pathway to Peace Park. Mr. Johnson suggested
the front could be graded up some as part of the landscaping. He also suggested that is would be nice
to have some type of historical marker in Peace Park to identify the remains of a former mill site.
Mr. Johnson moved to approve concept option 3 as presented with the following
suggestions/conditions: that the north stair tower stairs be rotated 90 degrees; that the pedestrian
access off Third Street be the width of the full driving lane; that the back of the fa<;ade, east elevation
be looked at closely as viewed from Third Street; that the triangle parking lot on Third Street be used as
green space; that consideration be given as to how to reduce the elevations changes as viewed from
the Second Street elevation, perhaps by raising the parapet so as not to appear so flat; that the design
team further address plans for lighting on the upper deck; and that the stairways to be black in color or
appearing as a fire escape as seen through the windows. Mr. Eastwood seconded the motion; motion
passed unanimously.
Mr. Tomten expressed his concerns about the project restraints caused by the budget. Mr.
Christopherson expressed his pleasure than concern is being shown regarding the view from Third
Street.
Meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Lieberman, second by Mr. Eastwood.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Saker
Recording Secretary
2
~
-CJi Ilwa fer
({jN ~==~~
~~~ === -
'r" .'R'''''A('I or "'''''d..$OlA ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 25, 2008
CASE NO.: DEMj08-07
APPLICANT:
Dave and Joan Fazendin
REQUEST:
Demolition Permit for portion of a single family home
LOCATION:
724 4th Street South
HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 3, 2008
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner ;U..:sf
BACKGROUND
Dave and Joan Fazendin, property owner of 724 4th Street South, is requesting a demolition
permit for the rear portion of existing single-family home. The home is part of the
Churchill, Nelson Slaughter's addition to Stillwater.
The home was built circa 1878. Since the home is over 50 years old, it is considered to have
potential historic significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is
required to review the demolition request.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the entire structure is not
being demolished the addition is not subject to the infill design criteria.
SPECIFIC REQUEST
The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish the west half of the existing home,
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are
determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic,
the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review...
Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for
issuance of a demolition permit."
A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or
building less than 50 years old.,. The home was built in the late 1800' s making it more than 50
years old which makes it potentially historically significant and requires review by the
Heritage Preservation Commission before it can be demolished.
724 4th Street South
Fazendin Demolition Pem1it
Page 2
Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of
a demolition permit by the Commission.
(1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its
property and with reference to neighborhood properties;
This information is included in the attached application.
(2) A legal description of property and owner of record;
The property is Lot 7, Block 5 of Churchill, Nelson, Slaughter Addition.
(3) Photographs of all building elevations;
This information is included in the attached application.
(4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be
demolished;
The west 20 by 24'S" portion of the existing single family home is proposed to be demolished.
TIle east half of the main structure and the separate shed will remain on the property. Even
though the applicant has not specifically made the request, it would appear that the enclosed
porch is going to be removed and replace with living space and an open porch.
(5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including,
where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition;
The applicant has included information related to the cost to lift the home and construct a
new foundation with full basement. If the applicant is allowed to demolish the rear portion of
the home and only lift the front portion this would result in a savings of $12, 150. No specific
information was included on the cost to restore the current rear portion of the home. Staff
would note that the section proposed to be demolished is one story in height and the proposed
addition will make that two stories in height.
(6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or
structure to be demolished is located;
The applicant stated in his application that he desires to build a new two story addition onto
the remaining portion of the home. Elevations showing the home after the addition has been
completed have been included in the applicant's packet. Due to the required roof span the
new roof will stand taller than the current roof Staff has reviewed several options and there
no good way to avoid this situation.
(7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning
requirements;
The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small
Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential. The applicant proposes that the site continue to
be uses as a single-family home.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the entire structure is not
being demolished the addition is not subject to the infill design criteria.
724 4th Sh'eet South
Fazendin Demolition Permit
Page 3
(8) A description of alternatives to the demolition;
The applicant does not specifically list an alternative to demolition in their application. They
have provided cost estimates to lift the entire house and construct a full basement under it.
The applicant states that lifting the entire home is cost prohibitive.
(9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or
reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible.
Mr. Fazendin advertised the rear portion of the home for sale in the Stillwater Gazette on
January 24, 2007. A copy of the ad is included in his material.
The applicant has included a report from Mr. Donald Empson. Including providing an
overview of the property, Mr. Empson noted that even though he is /I always reluctant to
endorse any demolition of an 19th Century home, I think in this case, it is worth sacrificing
the rear part of the house to provide option to improve the major part of the home./I Mr.
Empson noted that the home is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
ALTERNATIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options:
1. Approve the demolition permit as presented.
2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for
demolishing the structure or if the Commission believes there are alternates to
demolishing the structures.
3. Deny the demolition permit if the level of detail submitted by the applicant is not
sufficient for the Commission to make a decision.
4. Continue the public hearing until the April 7, 2008 Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Review and take action on the request.
attachment:
Application
Supporting documents from the applicant
. I
Dave & Joan Fazendin
10749 North 11 Oth Street
651-439-8019 CELL 651 -9835566
Fazendind@aol.com
January 22, 2008
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
216 Fourth St North
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission:
We have recently purchased the house located at 724 Fourth Street South
Legal description
CHURCHILL NELSON SLAUGHTER ADDLot-007 Block-OOS
I have contacted Donald Empson a historian from the list you supplied
I have attached a report from Don on the history of property.
I have attached photos of all views of the house.
I have attached a drawing of the house and what section we would like to
remove and also plans of the rebuilding.
I have also attached pictures of the inside of the building we would like to
take down. As you can see the cabinets have pulled away from the wall
due to the wall falling in . It would take extensive work to repair this corner.
Our plan is to lift the house and put in a full basement under house if we lift
the house as is it would cost $18,000.00 dollars. If we take down the portion
of the house and rebuild it would only cost $8,000.00 (Does not include walls
and footings in either bid or building of new) See attached bids.
If this project is approved I plan on taking the down section described and
recycling (reusing) the lumber and windows.
Sincerely,
Dave Fazendin
Heritage Preservation COmmission
Demolition Request Permit
Demolition Permit No.
Fee $100*
Address ofProject:.l'2..5 L\ -\-t--, ~'\. SOUTH- Parcel No.:330~OW)2(D "
Lot 00'\ Block 00') Subdivision C\-\vRC+\I.\....(.. Nt2 \ 5o~ jlA~H\.E..z
l-~TwA,~
Applicant: bA.'-.I-e. ~ :lJA,~ 't=~LE\.JO:r.\~ , .
Address: \Ol~q N. \ \ O~ ST. Telephone No.: bS ~ - Lf3<9 - ~O\'i
ST\ \\WA."Jet\, M---.), ))O~
Owner if different than Applicant: 'Sp... r"'\.cc:... A ~ C\ ~c.....J~
Address:
Telephone No.
Type of Structure: t .
----
ST 0 <\ "\
~ ~. (V)c::co )
Age of Structure: \ 0 ~D Condttion of Structure: ~o \2..-.
Intended Use of Site after Demolition: K~ ~~, \d
\ \ \ 'i \ 2.()o~
Date
\ \ \ <6 \ LO O~
Date
* Mer review and approval of the demolition permit request with the Heritage Preservation Commission, a
building permit must be obtained with the aty of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building
rmit is based on the valuation of the demolition roject.
Office Use Only
HPC Review Date:
o Approved
o Denied
. Oty Planner/Community Development Director
Date
I'
the characteristic four-panel doors, moldings and trim. The ceiling is less than seven feet
high. Underneath a part of this rear structure is a small limestone cellar. It is this rear
section the Fazendins wish to remove.
The front part of the house, two stories, is typical of a house built in the very late
1880s, or 1890s. It has a large front window with a simple stained glass border, tall
narrow one-pane-over-one pane windows, a higher ceiling, and wider moldings
characteristic of that later period. There is no basement under this part of the house.
The reasons for combining these two structures are difficult to say with certainty,
but the most obvious explanation would be that the Quinlans (next door at 720) had a
small rental property on Lot 7, and that when the Litfin family purchased Lot 7, they built
their larger house, adding the small rental unit as a rear kitchen addition.
The Fazendins, who have recently purchased the property, would like to remove
the older rear part of the house in order to raise the front part of the house and put a
modern basement under it, adding utilities and central heating-which the house does not
presently have. I have discussed their plans with the Fazendins, and they are well aware it
is important to keep the 19th century integrity of the house, and they are enthusiastic
about recycling or reusing whatever can be retrieved from the demolition of the rear
structure. They also plan on restoring the front porch to its original condition.
Behind the house, there is a "Stillwater shed" which the Fazendins are very
interested in keeping.
This house would not be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
Although I am always reluctant to endorse any demolition of an 19th Century
home, I think in this case, it is worth sacrificing the rear part of the house to provide
options to improve the major part of the house. Ifrenovated with respect for the 19th
Century integrity of the remaining house, this home will blend nicely with the rest of the
older neighborhood.
Donald Empson
2
StiUwater Gazette
INVOICE
1931 Curve Crest Blvd
Stillwater, MN 55082
Phone 651-439-3130 Fax 651-439-4713
TO:
Johnny's TV
1/22/08
COMMENTS OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ATTN: DAVID
Dates DESCRIPTION UNIT PRlCE TOTAL
1/24/07 David Fazendin / Ad Running Thursday $3Q,90 $30.90
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL DUE $30,90
Make all checks payable to Stillwater Gazette
If you have any questions concerning this invoice, contact the Gazette,
Thank you for your business!
l231 O-H;;;~i~~;;I;g-' 1231 0 Housec~
4\~
~,
Enjoy cOming home to a
Oean Hoose!
Weekly, B~Weekly,
Month~ Oeaning
Paul,j,nderson
HOllse Clea/ling
Call P:\Ul for mdi\'idualil'ctl
d'::lIling. u\ing (.anll frieuJly
prodtH.:t" rUr:.l greul price.
Call 651-436-7198
~~
Approx. 23' wide by 24' long
Call for details
651 u983-5566
36 ACRES IN AFTON - divide into
5 ac. parcels. House on property
to tear down or repair.
PRELIMINARY PROPOSALS
drawn. {vl0TIVATED - Best price
per acre - COMPARE.
r~~~
Corner of Sycamore and Owens
Suitable for 2 duplexes in GOOD
rentai location. Call me.
~+_~ If you're looking,
~ "1=J it's time to buy.
Roofs, Siding,
& Gutters
(tltl)ttte
Please contact
Davit! at 651.796.1100
with interest and questions
Earn Extra
Income,
We are needing an employ.
ee in our company for an
part time job position
contact:
55. brlghtlOl@gmall.com
for more details.
~~~ Nevvspape:rs
L
ClASSlFIEDS
produces quick.
S economical
RESULTS!
To place an Ad call
~;~I~P"ta~O"i~~li~~'JrT~~S (651)796-1103
870-$150 per day. 651-634-3&)2
2510
Roofs, Siding.
& Gutters
2510
A Quarter Century of Helping Hompowners
· Shingle & Flat Roofs
· Siding & Gutters
., -. .. Concrete & Stone Work
........ r;G~?)Jlli
9100
Help Wanted!
Fuil Time
v.'\W.J.austadconstruction.com
9100
Help Wanted!
Fuil Time
Free Estim.:.tes, Many ReferencES
licensed, bonded & ins'J';:;-C
A Dave Co
USTAD NSTRUC'JON
Residential 6: G:.m:nercia!
Bl.,r.',
Btt.
:.:.:~l:;"<'t;.~:"':~
182ARyo" ~r~
65; .~S2.0070
9100
Help Wante-j,'
Full Time
X~ ~fjl! .j ~jf.~~~~.:>i: '"..l("II-'i 't ;; ~~' 1 r }t~~."/:.~~ ~,~ ' "~\~",;i ~
WeJre . Looking
. for 'rA"J Players
Sun Newspapers, a growing chain of 44 newspapers in
the Minneapolis market has immediate opening~~or inside
and outside account executives. We are lopking for
enthusiastic, self-motivated professionals tojoin our
successful team. Ideal candidates should have 2 years
college in advertising a~d marketing, sales experience.
excellent communication; organizational skills with a
. commitment to customer,satisfaction. However we will be
. willing to train the right individual. Unlimited eamin~n~otentiaJ.
Excellent benelits 'including health, . dental, training'~:vacation
. and 401 K .' ;" -:' '''~.,>;f~',
. :....'1;...".n 01'"
-' . , ',~... - -, .\....~...:~.;y,i.~,:.,.;,,:..'...,....:.
'. --. ~\;~J:~~j". 'w, r
Please senifyourrij~JJlne to.: '. '/iJtH:'
SUN NEWSPAPERS"', ".. ,'}t~f,;
, Al1n: Pam.MiUer.~-~:~~~:;;:.;.:: .;, \ 1I/lfI&1; "
~J""'l. . ~ ,,~#-~ I ~ ""
Fax: 952-941.~~~.:~},;'~:.',:f::::~';,:., ,news~ers .
or pmiller@a~~PaPgf~~C,QQl:':'.<',;www'nW!4ti.;com.,
Heidi
Sun Newspaper Sr. i\CCcllllH EXl
Sun
Employees
These Bene
Health Insurance. Life
Paid Time Off · 4
Flexible Spending A
I
I Inside Advertising Rapt
I (Eden Prairie Ofiie
I Outside Account Ex
j IBased out of Eden Prair!:: & S
~
~I~
new~paIJ
Fa.x: 952-941-5'
Email: pmiller@ :.icnpa
W\V\V. mns un.co
'J~~ 22 08 J9:26~
C::ncre't.e Work~
65i27?0762
;- . \
CONCRETE WORKS
: ~ iC3i ~O\ r:3](('-)'7) I~ l6\ [
L' ~ ~~ ~-~ ~/ 7?j L;:"~ _-=:
Ccnc!'ete - fvtasonry - Bobcat Demolition
jh!1~. ,"it. \..Ol\li ^ Tnl!i
~,~..III (lrunc)l. .\1,'\ :;5C:,(;
Slcve \\'''''\1\)(,'"
G:; t -:\\.1:~I~ ~ 7:': tl
5012
Sold to:
Date: 01/2112008
Dave Fazendin
Home Phone
Cell Phone
Fax Phone
651-439-8019
651-983- 5566
651-439-7137
10749 N 1 10Ih ST,
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Project Address 724 4th Street South Stillwater, Minnesota
Footing - Pads
Block Works
Core
Flat Work
Excavtion & Back fill
Lifting Both Single Story & Main House (USee Below)
$3,236,00
$9,892.00
$2,375.00
$3,976.00
$3,500.00
$ 1 8,000.00
Total
$40979,00
UTo Lift entire house up 24" for full basement
Single story structure attached unstable work intensive to lift complete
Footings 8" X 20" Rebar
Block 12" Cored @ 6'
Floor 3 y," - 4" concrete 4000. TB
2 egress windows
I' /
f~_
PA YMENT TO BE 50% AT TIME JOB STARTED *** FULL PAYMENT DUE AT END OF PROJECT
f
;
~
..
.."
~
~~
.' I~
..
~t.
':J1,.
,.f" k
:\0 .'
'~
-: 1\:).-
t
':i
,
.
.....
'II
I
...
, I
~
.... '" .. - ,~.
-~
~
m~ ~~ [~ N
;:0-0 ~~ ::E
~~[ o c "'8"8 nil) @ n 0 <
~ ~
. . HUH o' ~
!H ~~ en S' ~
~g. ~~~~~~ n ~
&$ '"
~ Za. '< tlI o.:E_... (b ~
~ ~ g ~, ~.~g~~~ s:
~~ 5' 0
;;~&; ~~~~'~a " III ::E
- .... ~ 'U
"'-0 ~.~~g a~ ell
0",0 en m.
g~~ ~ ~j ~~~
03 ~ ,.. -<:f!I
"!< ""
g' , ~~ ~r 0
0 0
,. ~
~.
kf'i'
~
;:j ;:j ;;j ;;j ;;j
;:j N
00 ~ 0 Z z
..., z
z z ~
~
~
0
::E
;:c
;;j :0
;:j ;:j N ::E
00 z
Z z
. .
NEED TO VERIFY ROOF PITCH
EX/6TING FRONT ELEV,
~
~
B
~
,ffi == B f--
1==
= - t:=
~ 1==
I--
1==
tJ = t:=
-
1-- --->-
,
I<
2:7J 9 -
EXl6TING REAR
~
$
C)
- '
N
N
C)
,
-C)
c<)
- --C) - -
r
,
S:!
r
-'
~
C)
_ f
OJ
C)
PRELMINARY NOT FINAL PLANS
B
,~
,
~~
,
FRONT ELEvATION
r
.".
~
,-
q,
I , "
.--- ............... "" ,.... I" r ."
119-,~1
.9-.E X tlo-,S
.i9-/~ )( ,,0-.9
~
x
'"
~
l.
U!.
6
.O-,Z x .o-.~
,,0-." x ,o-.~
\I'
q
x
...
~
t.
1I~9-,'li1
l.
~
x
""-
~
i3
,-
~.
l.
\I'
q
x
...
~
t.
"9-;v X .9-".Z
t.3
t.3
.(
,
I
~---
nSUWI4::l PIO
l. I - ~
\J]
8 x
.,.
~
CJl
,-
~
"ttL-,Y
l.
,,~1I11 1-,51 l.
\
"\.
" \,
\ ",
\;.. f~ i. ~>.~.
. ....\.,...
"
\ "
. ""
'"',.,
'-,. '.
"v"
\..
J.,..
a. 9-," " .9-,Z
~
x
, ~ '6dsl9
Jli'llS:::l lOOJ Plo
f;,
\..
\n~!tS,.ll-,tt,
:-'\"~,,('i'" '\\y.
,. >\'-
\,:" . '" J\~_~.
'\.~\;, - .....
.;.\~~
c?
'.
.. . '~_,.:,2-:~~,
....t.; ~
"'-t...
.;,~
~':".,
,.
.-.
i' ",~
.,
,,;-<-
~~~;: ,~~~
't:.
..
~':." -~~.."
t~_::!:' ~t.
'.
,.
.~
.," - 1<:
'\~
'\ '-iJjL - q?",
-.}~~(~S;::
.".'" .> !<'
h ":-'~
, -,,-~'~<-,...- ".::'
-. - "~.;..-'
.' "t.
'"
~
x
.,.
~
l,
'i,
"! ~-
4t:~.
~;;;
t
~.'t -0
It I
t
,,9-." " .9-,l.
J
JlG-,az;
,,9-,1'"Z
,,9-,17
5
~
,
~=
i3
~
i3
,-
~
~
,E
~
4)
.""~
if
v-.~'"
IT'
~
.-
q,
-J
:p
H
1"'1
!il-
I.
{
-
o
Ij
$,
T"
!~
:f'
J,
",
~ l'
,""
" x
r 3P
...,. ...
~
~
'=
(J1
..
(p
~
~
~
:--~
---+\
i-h" )( 4'-h"
~
MAIN FLOOR FLAN
SCALE, 1/4" . )'-0"
3'-0- x 3'-011
m ~-----; :
o 0: : :
..-----i I
------;-----------~-----._---,
*
**
9
....
old chrmn~
4'-0-
r---
,
,
l
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
--,
II
..
"
"
:: 0
II .
:: In
"
r--.,.,-__,
. II :
i tt==~=:::=::::=::=:=::====
4'_10" L_ : 5'-4"
10'-2"
FROFOSED LAYOUT
---------O--t..I l!; ;;J-(,.I
1
~
..
~
'7
J5'-6~"
5'-0- x 4'~"
5'-0" x '2-0"
I
.
I
----1+--
...-------, f . I I
I :. : _ II :
i==n==*==================f=-:t1
I, ,
. I ~_______
..---____4
16'-8"
'9
in
"
9
III
Sit
~
~
~!~w
~
~'.k7'\~'''"=~I...o;r.:f~.~..
~
1_9 ObD
~ ~-e:o
j
....
x
~
r.
"-0"
"\g
I
(a
-,
~V\'* $:S:';D~,
~~
.
~ .
.....
"-- -
<;ff<<,.Q-.)'" o~ 't\t;:)Y~~(__~A~T) q
~, eo,.,... ~.,.;.~".- .\€ ,...~~.
IIII
.
..
. ,'. ~I
("'" .
, "",__."" c-
. ~... .~. .'. ~ ......-. ..-. .
. ..........
.., .
. -~...... "":"" -~w ; . ~.. ~ -.
L .~
-
,,!!lot
.'
'/\, ~-~
~
)r
----t
,..~>,. .
'-. .
'~
.'
;..
.~"-
....."'......"
.' ,~.
'." ..
.~4f~:
o.{. '..
'-i!k-~ ~
.'
<'
.'
I
.
~...:..'I""~"'.""......
I "". .
~~:
. ..
,--
-
(50 VT lr\ S:r.O't:
~~ ~\O\~~l:~~
-,
"." o\...-rr~\ .
" ./
II
Id
-I Ill" p
",! =
..
I
;
i. _ ~'..,.:w-.. ~~. ~~''::;!'l'.
o~~'fi. -\0 ~Or<\\-~
I
;:-,
..
, f
!
.~~,
I
I
II
II
- ...
j
/
\": i."".':.?. -;'1
,~ I
. 1 I
---..~ ...,,'-
'BtZ 'Kf..~~~\
r ~ "S'!Co €.. \C....1::TC-~~~
(S()Ul_~ ~E_~,!.. _C90_~)-'
III
(
I
.~..-
r-
.
1-
,.;,~~
~
,<
~,
~,..-
"
.; i: J'
I
J
j
I
t
.~.~ ,~~s-,~f- ~~.,
o~Qe~
~-
, "
"':...
II
pr.'
~~-
- I
" I;...,..,
L
iI:,
""""~
~ ,
I i
.'~ I
< oj 1
"";"~["
~,'.t. " ,,"-
~"I ./
. .~...... '; ,
. '-'~. ~
1
,
~
\..
~
_i ~- -
.;:
~
- ..
~~'--""
",",s;:::. o..n ~\\c\:x.~c.. w\\\ Nes\C.~f.~~.
_.- ":' ,--..-. ...~,., -"""",,,-.
. ~._._""~ __~ _ _._....._""".......,_.__1 'i"'r
lh4-S \J..)QtJLO ~ \A-~E.lN:l Oo~
l~=~-
Ill! f'I
l"
. ~~ ~
~~ .'~ .
-..
r. ..; .~.;..;-.I.~.... ." .'.'.1... I.
,.., '''\'''~:' _' r,
, ..,f ,
. '. ~~-' ...., . l!
,"- './ ,.." 'i "._., :.;.'Il
! -' , .. .
tl . , t,',
I ,.,.~ '
rp...... .... ~'""''''''''
r:r'"- ---
~
PT
"
~
--,
.. ~ ..t
t
..J
~
,
--'-."'lq-~ J~-
G _- ......1'> ;,........._
~_rJ;f..,
'" ,~'"
, .
cSii~t~~.
::- ~=~~ --~,
'H, BIR'''V;'C! Dr """,,"01' ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 28, 2008
CASE NO.: 08-08
APPLICANT:
Adam Johnson
REQUEST:
Demolition Permit for a two-car garage
LOCATION:
1104 3rd Street South
HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: March 3, 2008
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner f/1.5'f
BACKGROUND
Adam Johnson, property owner of 1104 3rd Street South, is requesting a demolition permit
for a two-car garage on his property. The exact age of the garage could not be determined
and a building permit for the structure was not on file at the City office. The garage
appears to have been added on to the rear section at some point. In 1997 the City issued a
permit to reroof the garage. The style and condition of the sh"ucture leads staff to conclude
that the garage is more than 50 years old.
The garage has limited deterioration and is in need of general maintenance to prevent
additional deterioration. The garage is in far better condition than many garages that have
been reviewed recently for demolition by the HPC. As noted in the applicant's letter, the
applicant desires a larger (3-car) garage to meet their current needs. It would appear that
the applicant's desire for a larger garage is the driving reason for the demolition of the
garage in this case and not the over all condition of the structure.
Since the garage appears to be over 50 years old, it is considered to have potential historic
significance. Consequently, the Heritage Preservation Commission is required to review
the demolition request.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main sh"ucture is not
being removed a new garage is not subject to the infill design criteria.
SPECIFIC REQUEST
The applicant requests approval of a permit to demolish the existing two car garage.
1104ydStS
A. Johnson Garage Demolition Permit
Page 3
The applicant states in his application that:
· The existing building does not have an adequate foundation.
· It is cost prohibitive to lift the garage and without lifting the
garage then any renovations would be simply "patches".
· The current garage does not meet the needs of the owner. It is
too small for a full size pickup truck.
· The garage can not be adequately sealed from the elements.
(6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or
structure to be demolished is located;
The applicant stated in his application that he desires to construct a new 38' by 26' garage
with storage above the garage. The new garage will be in the same location as the current
garage.
(7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning
requirements;
The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small
Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential. Once the current garage is demolished the
proposed garage would be required to meet all of the requirements of the zoning code as
proposed.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not
being removed a new garage would not be subject to the in fill design criteria.
(8) A description of alternatives to the demolition;
The applicant states that there are no alternatives to demolition. Staff would offer that
restoration of the existing structure is an alternative to demolition. Additionally, the
applicant could build a second garage to meet their needs. Staff would note that under the
RB zoning district the application would not be permitted to construct a second accessory
building on this property without a variance.
(9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or
reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible.
The applicant has indicated that they have advertised the home in the Stillwater Gazette
between February 15 and 19,2008. A copy of the ad has been included in your packet.
ALTERNATIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options:
1. Approve the demolition permit as presented.
2. Deny the demolition permit if the applicant has not proved the necessity for
demolishing the garage or if the Commission believes there are alternates to
demolishing the garage.
. <
I
February 20t\ 2008
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
216 Fourth Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission:
A demolition permit is requested for the garage that is located in the southwest corner of
the property detailed as: Lots One(1) and Two (2) and the East Twenty-five (25) feet of
Lots Twenty-three (23) and Twenty-four (24), all in Block Four (4) of Churchill and
Nelson's Second Addition to Stillwater. There is no evidence that supports the age of the
structure. There are no permits on file with the City of Stillwater for the original
structure or for the two additions that were made to it: First addition being the four feet of
extension to the west wall of the structure, evidenced by the failing 1.5" slab that has
separated from the primary slab and is sinking lower than the primary slab, and the
second addition being the eight feet of extension to the south wall of the structure,
evidenced by a lack of second floor joist construction in that area, seams in the clapboard
siding, and the obvious visual sag of the southeast corner away from the original primary
structure. The sag or compression of the southeast corner framing is also evident by the
overlap in the corner trim in the area between the second and first floor. The second floor
of the south addition appears to only have car siding as a sub floor with no type of
supporting joist material suppoliing it from below. I do not trust any portion of the
second floor sub floor with my own body weight.
No other information about the structure has been found or provided. I purchased the
property from the Hasty family in February of2007 and nothing about this structure was
included in the disclosure documentation. I was informed by a neighbor that a lean-to
sty Ie roof was at one point attached to the west wall of the structure to provide controlled
outdoor access for the horses that were kept in the structure. The only current evidence
of this is some makeshift framing and car-siding on what used to be a large opening on
the west wall. The structure is hand framed "balloon" style in some areas, and covered
with %" car siding with a final outside covering of clapboard siding. There are three
windows that have been allowed to waste to the point where they barely function. One of
the windows has improperly sized sashes such that the two sashes overlap each other by
inches when the window is fully closed. The slab foundation does not provide any rise
from the grade level around half of the structure and the result is that the bottom sill plate
has rotted beyond salvage on the west wall and the west side of the south wall. The
decay in the southwest corner has worked its way up the wall studs. The subfloor for the
second floor, accessible by a dangerous interior staircase, has also wasted to the point
where it is unsafe to walk on the second floor. During heavy rains and the spring thaw,
the runoff from the southwest and west neighbors flows under the west wall, across the
inside floor, and out under the doors on the front of the structure. The previous owners
made no disclosure about any improvements made to the structure and it is obvious that
(Q Adam R. Johnston
, .
1
30+ years of neglect has brought this structure to its current unsafe status. Because of
holes gnawed by rodents at the grade level, and the inability to properly seal the carriage
house style doors, the structure has become home to squirrels and other rodents, which
presents a significant fire hazard should they choose to consume any of the exposed
electrical conduit. The roof is hand framed and the shingles, based on color and texture,
appear to have been replaced at the same time the primary structure was re-roofed in the
late 1990's.
(Q Adam R. Johnston
, "
1.
EAST-EAST-EAST
... -;; :.~;,l---...!:=r~ ---!' .~i!..~7..~ ;'y .'~ ;;,. .
~. . :!(-!' '- "5',,-/ ;'''.' ;. --:-:-=Tt~' ~ '.'-;-".
,,;~t','ir.l.4f _~-,::"'_. - . ... __' --'-'---m" _
'w_-r--T ....,r- " ..\~.\
"-\I"~ll i~
~.~~ ,
\,J A.t
~ ~I
\.) 1.)>
......, ~..... i
"-I -,,:, I
'-1'1
~ ~\ :
~.. "
~' ~.
~~ ~, i
~. V\ I
:;.~ -=:~~fr
it~
\'\~J
~\:;"11
~^--- ~..:.'S!~
- "'-"
-":..-::-:.:.--
:.t.:??-/
"f r-
J..5
. -,'?9
,)'.,
". ',.
."...,
~l
~.
~ 1
, .
: ~ffLJ l
"t~"" .. ", " \ '4 ,"'.
~ ~ ':;1 '\
i't"t''>-' ,,4~,~. \ ~ I J.
~ " ~;.' I' t
J, '\:, 1., ''0 i, ~.'"
;;,; "'
, "'I ," ~~
1:-'..... ,', \. ~:~ . '." :r'~.
. i"l
,....'" 1 ~
"f: j " ~~l '
~ ~:~l (~
, "~'I:' .-J
''''''L': ';"':' "',
.~ ( ..." 'to :i I
. "
'\ . ~ 1
I ',-,'
.~. .j4
I s ~~~;.:
':.,:: ./
I
~~
. "
. ,
,.i
. .
1, )
i,
i- .;..
"
\;
r.
~:} . ;
:>, ~ . A
;~
'4 ,
., 'I
,~ \
:-!
I
,
-'
~~:
hj
~l
''4
it,
'I:
..",
l'
_:. l"-Z ,.:;
'" ~~.~. .,f: -:=7 ,. '_' ....
. I ii;~ ./- .'" -"l:/~t/
l~;
:.... l;'
'~,. 1"-.
1:' ~ f
..~ :! /{
:! j+"-
! ~ -
j'. \. ~.~
t - ...L.. -:/_:.:.,/~ ~ ~'
:, ;\' ~. ~1-r': [ . ;./~:: /"~;' ~~'~J t~
':~, "-'-' . "..;;.o;t.7'..........._> ~ J
\'~:'": r-::-.~:,' ~ .:. x 0 .
..L (.7.7
; -- -~ -- (7::1 ,;tJ-t7/~
_~"\#Z. ^...~,_"'"~_ . A 'I
- .
, -'
w_ ,....,
--'"
.}
,
. - . .. ~ - ----~~'~~~~;Z-;;~-
t7 ;; /.1'&: ~
. 0"''')
Z,
, J
I
1
:.::-'1'
...,.~
",,'-<t
\":'i
~:~
....i
~
...~
1~
...~ .~... j'..-, ~~."\
l 1;. \:"
-,;' ~
I ;,... l,\
I', I 1\t.1 "' '~; ~Jl. ;t~l
{," .,'.... .....'.. ~~.:..,:
'~I ,".' 1 ".";<"
'4 .~'~: >, r..;.. (,::' ,"
~ r IT.;': ~!
f'/' ~ ;::~. '''1/ .,.:~t~i.l' ~'
>' .. '':, ( .~! J~
. ;. I,: ";- .., ':if,).
~:~ ~; { t:' ~ ~ '.-.li'~
.~ r-~" P"~ l~~: .:. '~; 1';'~'
...J.""- b t,,' 1 '0.'
. ~:"" '~"'.., ..51 ":'
.~.", )
~ /~;.J .
: <3. ~\~:~,J:-:. ~
',. . a~ I
,- , I ~~ ~~: 1,;' ~: ~\ \
,/ _';7 -,/ __. , I jr.! l.:
~ ''''\ '~~::;, ; !J' ,<(~ I
--:;-. \...' <.....; I ' :
f it ~ ) ~ '<-.:..'1/'
_ ._ J ..~ ." "......~
._ .' T ~, I .....1}.tt'.~
7"&..,;,~.." W<"..."" 'J'".,[
." . > ";'" (J .,,,' ,,'t<-'l:< ..\
. ,," ~~ /- - - :~. ./.\~~~~: :~~
~,1,~l~.._-f.J./t.>jt> \~~'> .~:!.~
/
i:./ "~;':I:~Z
WEST - WEST-WEST
~--~. .'
~ ,_v-
~~ ~
;~J;
~.g.~ ~.~. '~
~.~~ .~~
;: .,N.:
'{i-~ ~~
. .~. "'\~
~".':,.
:;:. t r; ..'
{; ,-,) t:
j:'!: ~
'" '>;1.::1)
:~ ~~
~.t>J ~i
"'~~a~ 1
,g' ;l tn~ ~:
~ ~..~ ~ .:.~::,
",", V 'J?", i;':
~ E ~~ ~
~~~l~~.~
~ t t'JI;: ,.":~
~ ~,.;r. ...'
.c~Sl: .
...... f"......._ ~ ::
1 .~..
.'
.
\
,t..,
...j
~~~
,
\~::~r,.:i
Jf.. .,
.,;::::~
$"~
:,:~.::
..,.}~ ~
~~j~\ -{:
.. .'
""-.\.; :~
'..
~I
:\.1
."
'."t.
~i
r:csl
.
~,
~
'-4
~ Adam R. Johnston
-~;o".~__
'V .
r... .
t'- .
M:
-r-:
1
>
i
ci.
;.>
%
-,......:
~::> ;
c> :
t'.! ~
""~
'rt> :
"." :
':1>:
~[
..;
'"
..
c
~~:"'>..
> t \~d
<,:" .,.....
" !
,~l ~
',",31 t
~! ;J
:1
~
r
1
~',:~ .~; j
">~" ~~ ~
.... ....'.t-
,! ~~.l
,': lj !
";'~ .,:;il
.... (- ~
'.j~')""" "'I- ~
"I ~i
:';!I~l...:l
\)1 :
,,,, J :'
'~:-' I
(:,; I
~
. ,
1
2. Lots One(l) and Two (2) and the East Twenty-five (25) feet of Lots Twenty-three
(23) and Twenty-four (24), all in Block Four (4) of Churchill and Nelson's
Second Addition to Stillwater. Owner ofrecord is Adam Resch Johnston.
,..,
.J.
"J r ~<<
. ~ / ~' ~
EAST
NORTH
~ Adam R. Johnston
.. West elevation:
--y-/~/~/~/
,/ /'~ ,//-:::: /~------
." /'.-/ ~~ . /~--- ------ --~---
,-:~ ~ ..----..--~..----'
.",:.. X' ---- - .---- :;,---:;.----------::-------
.. ";J' .-" '''1 ,...-,/' ::...--- .....----- .....------ -----
~ '"\'\' (P x: -' " /-- ..----. ---
I .. '.~. .1/,1""-' -,' _.,-- ..---- -- --.--
~) J;:~~';- -- - - -;::;---::::::-::::-~~--
\t\ l n-~lf~4r :~::;~~:~.:::~:.--=-=------'----=--~
1\~l:;( ttl~r --.--.----.----- .----
" ",)"i-...;' .I =..-::-.:-=----
-"", '':;''::D,j'~' ~j~ -- -.., -- -. --------~----.--
. _ .1, _'~I -------------
IIIIla. ,-..t - .------::..
_ t... ~';~1' -.- ------
- --~,. . --.--------- ----.----
_ ~ ~ l.... ,:;' .' --'-..
.
ulmark I
_____.COfT]
',t
r...w~~~".l. ..,..ll~>I
Ir
.yt
.):
~t
1
~.
,l:l-
I'
South elevation'
~.
~-
~._-
L--------
:-===-------=
:......-..-------
....----
..--=:---~_.--._---
.;.-~~-----
---.-----....----------
-~-_.....---~-:;
------_._-.-.---,--.0...,
.,------ --'---
C~~_,...=_--..~--=
---"....-,._-_....~-
-- ------~.-
E:~~]~~~
~.=====-.- ---, ~.-:.. -,
t::.,.. ---- '-
I '"'__:::......_._~~ ~ ....
---.. ""-...,..
~:::~ .-.~
-.... "--. "
...... ~...,. --
....... ~~--- "'''--
--.. .
..' ~...- - ~--::-"'7l'~.
--'--..' ,'- - .....~.. ~~
--- ---' '-.
---=::::--:::
~~-!
---.., -- -~i'
-...._..~ ---
-----------"'^----~
--._~.~- -_------:-:.---.~~
~~~~::_- ~
..-- ...._.__.._.......-,...._________.--..:t<-~
._--- -- - - - --- --""-
H...__.-----~ -...---... -;,-
---..-
_......~ ---' --- --
--
.--'.
---:."::~.:~~:-.-
,;:.,
-" ~.-.~-~.....
~ .~..~ .::.- -~:- --
,",w. ~~~~~ - ,~-~-.::~-.-.-.--
....... ~........... '".... ~-....._----
"'-"~ - -........ -........,,~
---.
.....,
"'--.
......
~. ~" ~ ~:-:" ~. "-
"
..:;:
i!o;;
"
- ---
-;:-~..,-,,~. .
~ ---~';: '" . ,
--- .. ---... --... ~ ".... .. ".. '"'
- ~...._- ~--_.,~::<::::-.. "
............... ....,,'- -....... ......,. ............... ~
-'-- -"'-.., ----... '--......,.............:::...::....... ~
"-. ~..... ..." "'''
==~l(--" :0::
-----
-..--..-,.- --_.-~
...-~
f
~
I
'~
I. ,
-..-'--..--~
,
>>
I
,I
I
.,-' ; -.
, 4 .
~ : i
.~ ,,;..
(Q Adam R. Johnston
4. The entire garage structure located in the south west corner of the property and
it's respective slab foundation. Reference the arrow pointing to the structure in
item I of this request.
5. The cost ofrenovating the existing structure does not justify the end product.
This structure suffers from an inadequate foundation and any investment made to
the structure without creating a solid foundation is throwing good money after
bad. The entire structure would have to be elevated off of its existing pad and
moved to another location on the property so that equipment could be used to
demolish and recreate the existing slab. There are two reasons why it would be
cost prohibitive to lift and move this structure. The first is that the bottom sill
plate has rotted in enough places that the structure cannot be elevated with
support from the grade level. The second is that the inconsistent floor joist
construction for the second floor, because of the addition made to the south wall,
does not provide a reliable or safe method of elevating the structure by supporting
lift under the floor joists. Without a new foundation that provides a rise above
grade level, any "patches" made to the framing will only provide a temporary
delay to the decay that is apparent and inevitable for this structure. It is obvious
to every construction related individual that I have spoken with that the cost
associated with lifting/moving and then moving/dropping the structure onto a new
foundation would far exceed the cost of new construction. Re-grading the
property on the west and south walls would not provide a solution as the slab on
the west wall is less than two inches thick. Re-grading would cause further
erosion, already evident in the northwest corner, under that part of the sub
standard slab and lead to further sinking of that corner of the structure. Complete
recreation of the existing structure is not a smart investment in the property. The
existing door sizes do not accommodate a standard full sized pickup truck and any
enlargement of the door openings would encroach upon the sash window on the
north wall of the first floor. Also the six inch spacing between the two doors
renders one of the parking bays useless as you are not be able to open the doors of
a vehicle in the east bay should a vehicle be occupying the west bay.
6. The proposed plan is to build a new garage, over the site of the existing structure,
that has a larger footprint but replicates the elevations of the existing structure. A
larger footprint will allow the structure to be functional as a garage versus the
limited usability of the current structure. The elevations will mimic the existing
structure in that wood frame double hung sash windows will be employed as will
redwood clapboard siding and a fake "hay door" on the second story. The new
roll-up overhead garage doors will be carriage house style. The new soffits will
match the existing soffit appearance and will allow for soffit-ridgeline venting to
prevent mold and decay which is one of the problems in the current structure.
The second story will be used for storage. The partial arch window structure on
the front elevation will not be employed on the new structure. While a partial
arch window is sometimes used for Italianate style Victorian design (the primary
residence is It alianate ), the primary residence does not employ any of this style of
window and therefore use of that window style would architecturally clash with
~ Adam R. Johnston
the primary residence. The large double hung sash window on the east elevation
will match the size of the windows on the primary residence, 3 5"x70". The one
entry door will be an Italianate style door. The structure will employ 2x6 framing
and will use trusses for the second floor and the roof. There will be no plumbing
or sewer associated with the new structure. Although they are not illustrated in
the attached elevations, dentil and corbels will be added in the soffit area to match
the primary residence. No trees will need to be removed. I will petition Qwest to
move their utility pool before new construction. It currently sits almost four feet
into my lot from the property line behind the existing structure.
~ Adam R. Johnston
North/front elevation:
~ j
,
jl
Irl
!
I
f
I
I
I
I
11
.J
...._._~~._.- .......^
I
I
I
,
,
i
I
I
I.
~ Adam R. Johnston
East elevation:
, ,:
Ii
i;
II
,
[ ~
, .
ID
t.._...__....._____ ...__ ,-_.
;
i
I
, t
I!
_~ 1
~___.. . ... .'n,
t~ll' I
. _, ____.lq 1
..____ili
~ Adam R. Johnston
South elevation:
H""'rn"'Hii
i "
; h t :~ ! r ~
i.illi.:. 1".1.'
< I r \::
lL.~ , . ;~!
m"rTljii"
"~"~". H.~ 1.. ..........
H \ I'
i + "'i<in
i ;! ji
ty 4~,,,.. :u
\
rH'H.-'m"'H^.C. .
~ 1 ~ ;11
i. h~'~
~i T :1
I. I,., ll-;,~.I.
!! 'tt
!; II'
" . 't;
---,~-".._". :..
~ Adam R. Johnston
West elevation:
'A-_~"V_""_~T"-""=.;;:":"'_~
~~--~
I
I
I
,
(Q Adam R. Johnston
7. Survey map showing location of new structure:
- ~
_-!.."";'~.7 ,,~/'
,.-
t?~')
" -_on;;3 W -----,.~~~;~/:;:- ..
t1 <.Y / rtL"
~o~"""'>
..".
----..J, \
~.~
.~ h
,~ ~
""" "
. ;' ."......,
..t..5
- -..;,;- ;;:':~l__.'';:o~ ____f' ;'::.:1'.(:1.._' ~y
-"' =--=...:;:-...
",-'-__'L~ .;V';~...-"ff
t :, F.:=r=--r
.::' ....~~.
".t-...~
. ,
,,",'4
~. I
~.
.... -..
:r~l~'~, l
r};rJf"~\' .
.1: ", , \' , '~ ~; ~
... i';/ 'M~ ,'i. ,. ~J
. ,,"", ~ ~~ I :
J. ,\;, 1"',~,
~;'"~ J' ~
f\ \ ~!~! '~~L
'''f: J ~~ ,~~! .j ~
~, t; :~i ~~., I.::,V
~ j':
I \":1' ~
.,:,... ..;'i,......~'~ ',t' "'j
.. ,1
. ,
. . \-l?: I
I . .
- ;:
;y
! .~. <.,::
I "
!-Y
:, I
.',
. ,
~ ;~
1.t
I,
...:
.,j.
"
\::
r',
}: I '
;..; ,"
~
'1
I
!
.......~i
"~
~~
/
--./
},.j
'~I
{t..
'l:
1.. ~
l'
-~ . ~~ r}'
-k~. {
" I:f;, "" ';
, ~'< .!
I~
1. t/
, ;">'1'-;
.~ -
.~,,:" -\.
11:. {/
;~ ,,/',.,
1 ". $. ~ 1 .:~ ~ ...- J -":,,/
~i. . i: nJ~~".;:.': '"" u,"f .t...
l'~~-:' ~::~.. ~ . ~-,.~-~..~_.-~- ;,r:''r~-
.... Af.77
- -. - F':?'.:J#/
Footprint
of new
garage
~-'
.{
i
-" ;:-
,-.''''''''''.-
':i,,;;.;,~;--.
>.I'J-"~~ :.";".-:_ fJ.*"'//I' ~ - '-
-- '"... . - -----.-
'/"~~.
:, , -,.~
.f - ''\ \
~~r~
,\ t,~~ I
~} \l.:'..
\-..1 'f
~ ~l
,ft t)"
'.... ~..... l-
"4, -,,:. '
""I'
~. 'it
~~ ~-
}j, t,
~~ ~'I'
'", \::;i .
~:;~~ ~: ':.(.+
. I
...}
'"
,;
t.:
r;.~". y~ >;~
.. -~~~~,-~ ~- ~"J.~---
....e'" L/
r-, I
~.
"fj
'?'>7' .~,
~ '~~ ~ .
;: ~ { ~J;. 'i.;,
':\"-i ;';:'"
..... ~.~
".! ,\".,,,---,J
, ,~};..'
" 7'
f- ;! l
i
T ~-'~I;;"'../~~'--(yJ"'!~:;';'
- . ..LcJ7
Y:)<;'l~~'ii./~js.- -
tv-
':
''; 4
,<~ .,
",,'*
t-' ~,
,
...,~,
'I'
\tl
>-
"
....:v..,
<-'~ >::'
~:'j .:
f""""~
.:. .0:;",
~.
".
l.V.
~:'
" ,I ,/ -' , ........
',.,," / 1~'1'~\
~"')~(.':r:-l':
_" . ~\~"-r;;; 0 "'I'::'
~~ .l;::?<r<
~r----.' 0-
~~~
,- "r
;;-gE
~%v
=;;-:=
~.. " (;
J';~
'.t~~
:.:. t ~~
<.; t.;t t'"
i::'!O: S
?:'''''
"'......... ~.. ,..
'" l'1 * '" ~
:;:;. "! ~...,:
~.:Xl.... ,-"
,...;~.~-d. .;
!$ xz. V -t.-:", ;:
- ;< !r. .~ .~.. '
~~.~~':
';:'9 ~~E '-'~
.t) E ~~ ".,li
~ ~.:.....; tJ
-..p~~, ~.
;.. . ""'. .' .-8;: '~~...'.'
.:::> 1:; ., .
:e~~:=_;--"
va~~ .;"
J:$~5u
~ a...~.s t
I
t~ i
I
:.-. :-,",
~~x \.\
,,' .~
::. C,
", -..:
!:
"
1.''-
i ~l
"
J'\
.,~
,
,
'..,}'.;
> l"t,:
,~
'C.
>~~!'t-:
<,:':: :~..
,.....
~1
"
~,
~~~
"
~I
;''l>-1
t\~
"\
~.l
~I
"l,
,
-,
t':;
'-';
4,J:i'1;
~ Adam R. Johnston
.~~ .....
r"~ ,
t'- .
~;
~
~~
':.
z
,,;,.
-~
%
/,-, :
0;
0:
N,
~,
m:=.
" .
I
4';
~1
..;
...
~
'..,\
. .
.. \ j
'<:'~' i
'1 i
:!
f
',', jl I
J
II
t
1
. I
:'~. ':;.,
.; '~'t I
".~, ~~ ~
, . !';<'l'
,'. J I .
, I
y' ~,{" ~
""t,j \~ ~
,.,1." ~
:- I ~~{
~ <T~ j
',,} ~
;':t... ~
t
I
~
I
,
.;'\.\
"
',",
1
t'JI
8. There are no alternatives to the demolition. Without demolition the structure will
continue to decay and at some point will become a liability, because an
uncontrolled collapse of the structure could impact the property and belongings of
my neighbors were it to fall in the direction of their lots. Any salvageable
framing lwnber from the existing structure will be milled for use in cabinets. Any
salvageable "wavy" leaded window glass will be stored for use as replacement in
the event of window damage to the primary residence.
9. The price was set to compensate me for lost time and wages associated with
supervising any movement or dismantling efforts associated with someone else's
desire to reuse the structure. The following listing was posted in the Stillwater
Gazette & Valley Life starting February 15th for 5 days:
For sale:
$3000 for old horse barn/garage for restoration or reuse. Age unknown. Removal
requires use oflicensed+insured contractor. SW corner of 1104 3rd ST S,
Stillwater. Sale is contingent on approval from Heritage Preservation
Commission. Adam 408-348-5776
Summary:
I purchased this property a year ago knowing full well that a great deal of investment on
my part would be required to restore it to its original Victorian era and grace. While the
outside of the primary residence maintains its charm and grace, portions of the inside
suffer from a lack of attention, no regard to the original period of construction and
remnants of a poorly implemented conversion to a duplex at one point in its history. The
only evidence of attention over the last thirty years is new roofing, a horrible "harvest
gold" kitchen motif and a matching electric blue sink, shower tub and toilet in the
bathroom, obviously done sometime during the 70's when those were popular choices.
Over time I will be changing these areas of the house back to Victorian appearance. I had
a vision of what this property could become and part ofthat vision was to create a
functional and safe garage that would still maintain the look and feel of the existing
garage. I ask that the Commission share my vision on improving this property and allow
me to make the investments necessary to enhance the value of my neighborhood without
sacrificing the look and feel that make Stillwater so attractive. I hope that the
Commission appreciates the thought, time and investment that I have put into this
proposal and I am open to any suggested recommendations.
Thank you for your consideration,
'7 /~...../oo
L._I <C- 0; . c.:::>
Adam R. Johnston
<<J Adam R. Johnston
,,'
Adam Johnston
1104 3rd Street South, Stillwater, MN. 55082
February 22, 2008
River Valley Restoration - Rolf Dittmann
MN. License # 20225283
12823 St. Croix Trail North
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 phone: 651-430-1560, cell: 651-343-2255
Project Overview:
Restore Historic Carriage House
Project steps:
* Structural stabilization: reframe and add framing members to existing structure
* Install bracing to prevent racking
* Set up cribs, jacks, and beams and lift building approximately two feet
* Replace approximately 50 % of sill plate
* demolish foundation, excavate for new foundation
* Form and pour structural floating slab
* Set building down on slab
* Construct new code compliant interior stair
* Install two new carriage-style overhead doors
* Install a people door
* Restore three windows
* Scrape, prime and paint building
* Provide all new electric subpanel, wiring and fixtures
* Provide all dumpsters and building permits
We agree to perform the above project in a workmanlike manner for the sumer of fifty-eight
thousand, five hundred dollars ($58,500).
Mechanics' Lien Notice:
Any person or company supplying labor or materials for this improvement to your property may file a lien against your
property if that person or company is not paid for their contributions. Under Minnesota Law you have the right to pay persons
who supplied labor or materials for this improvement directly and deduct this amount from our contract price, or withhold the
amounts due them from us until 120 days after completion of the improvement unless we give you a lien waiver signed by
those persons who supplied any labor or materials for this improvement and who supplied any labor or materials for this
improvement and who gave you timely notice. By executing this proposal, I/we are admitting service of and receipt of this
Mechanics' Lien Notice.
(initials )
Acceptance of Proposal
The above prices, specifications, conditions, and mechanics' lien notice are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are
authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. If payment is not made as agreed, you
shall be entitled to all costs of collection you incur, including reasonable attorney's fees.
Date of Acceptance:
Signature:
Signature:
River Valley Restoration - Specializing in Buildings of Character in the St. Croix Valley
,~
.'
l'.(t"
3'.0"
\1'.0"
2'-6"
1'-6"
PRELIM. FRONT ELE. 2-20-08
3W.O'
"
~
Z'-U"
DO
DO
DO
W".I
..,.kl
1(,".0.
PRELIM, LEFT ELE. - 2-20-08
1'.()~
C
'r.
.-
I
I
~'.g 3 4"
16'-61'2"
~'.S 3/4"
.,
x :;,.
~
'" ----
-
-- --
"
26'-0"
PRELIM. SECTION. - PARALLEL CHORD (NS)
J3'.0.
b
3W-0"'
13'.on
IQ
DI
111 r l~ 111
IQ
'Y.U"
''.If'
PRELIM. BACK ELE. - 2-20-08
~
~
~
~~~
'1', B'RIHPIAr:1 (If MlfINE,O'A ')
Memo
Community Development Department
To:
HPC
tJ/l"
From:
Michel Pogge, City Planner
Date:
Re:'
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Case 08-04
Message:
Design Review Case 08-04 was withdrawn by the applicant on Thursday, February 28,
2008. No action is need to be taken on this application.
Thank you,
Mike
From the desk of...
Michel Pogge, AICP . City Planner' City of Stillwater' 216 N. 4th Street. Stillwater, MN 55082
651.430-8822 . Fax: 651.430-8810 . email: mpogge@ci.stiIIwater.mn.us
~.
cStiIlwat~r
1 ~~ ~ -~
,,-="- . ---' .
'Oil 81"'''";A.:( (I' M:NN':.OIA ')
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
February 25, 2008
CASE NO.: 08-09
APPLICANT:
Nordquist Sign Co
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed signage for Party City
LOCATION:
1851 Market Drive
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
BPC - Business Park Commercial
ZONING:
BP-C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE:
March 3, 2008
REVIEWERS:
Community Dev. Director
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner n4
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval to replace an existing "Party
America" wall sign at 1851 Market Drive with a new sign that says "Party City". The
new sign will be comprised of individual channel letters in four colors; red, purple,
orange, and blue. The proposed sign is proposed to be 42" tall by 24' wide for a total of
84 square feet in size.
For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the
signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that
for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for
each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's retail space has 84
feet facing Market Drive. The total sign area of the proposed sign is 84 square feet,
which meets the square footage allowed by the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
.' 1651 Market Drive
Page 2
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines. The
proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance
attachments: Applicant's Fon11
Elevation Drawing/Photo
~VOO:Ol'G 'g;;j aW!l pa^!a)a~
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
Case No:
Date Flied:
ReceIpt No.:
Fee~ $25.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DI!PARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STR.!!T
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant Is responsible fot the completeness and accuracy of an forms and
supporting m,aterlal.ubmttted In connection with any application. All supporting
material (te. photo., 'ketche~, etc.) submItted with application becomes the
property of the City of Stillwater. Photos, sketches and a letter of Intent 1$
requIred.
I=ourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required.
All following InformatIon is ~etluired I
Address of Project 1 g S i
, ZonlnQ DlstrictbP ~G
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
{v1~rk.tt Dr:v~ssessor's Parcel-No. 6')o3o;){5 33;?OOS-
,,/, (P.~ulred)
DescrIption of Project in detail ~S/YV
''I hereby.#:i1te the foregoing statements and a/l datar Information 6nd evfdence
submitted herewith In all respects, to the best of my knowledll~ 6nd belief, to be
true and correct. r further certiJY r will comply wIth the permit If It Is granted and
usedN
'If representative Is not property owner, then property owner's ~lgnature Is r#(lulred.
Property Owner ;5\tvAcz:t- ~ I It-> i: RepresentatIve N Q (d t:i ~ t ~; \~l~.-": Co ~ PQ f) '1
Mailing Address ~.5Bd5 5.::./;~ p~ ~Malllng Address 31 ~ W. Lcd<..t'.. ~'h"ee- t
5<.J1'r€'"5~ LA \ I 8
City State Zip ~U'lcH "-'00 D L 0 f.I l{V/'22- City State Zfp r II MeA.. p Q iG I H N r.; r;; L/ 0
Telep~~~~-G~~~ Telephone No. (,12.- ~1.~-n_~1
Signa -- Signature of ~ ~L
- (Required) (Requited)
H: \mcnamara \5 heila \2.005\deslg n revl ffW permIt. wpd
July 13, 2005 .
-( .. , t ,..,,, f".,
Illl , ^ I . r (\ ^ ^ ...., . ^ 7 . r'\'" I
or
RETURNS: PMS 272C
FACE: A9460-T BRIGHT
PURPLE - AVERY
TRIMCAP: 2287 PURPL
RETURNS: PMS 185C
FACE: 230-43 LT. TOMATO RED
TRIMCAP: 2793 RED
GD COLOR DETAILS
31.1
RETURNS: PMS 299C
FACE: 230-57 OLYMPIC
BLUE
TRIMCAP: 2945 BLUE
RETURNS: PMS 185C
FACE: 230-43 LT. TOMATO RED
TRIMCAP: 2793 RED
RETURNS: PMS 021 C RETURNS: PMS 361 C
FACE: 230-44 ORANGE FACE: 230-156 VIVID GREEN
TRIMCAP: 2119 ORANGE TRIMCAP: 2108 GREEN
o
y
RETURNS: PMS 299C
FACE: 230-57 OLYMPIC
BLUE
TRIMCAP: 2945 BLUE
EXTERIOR ILLUMINATED
PC LETTERS
This drawing is the property of:
r ,
Ea.
Nordquist
RETURNS: PMS361C
FACE: 230-156 VIVID GREEN
TRIMCAP: 2108 GREEN
Nordquist Sign Company, Inc.
312 West Lake Street
Minneapolis, MN 55408
PH 612.823.7291
FX 612.824.6211
www.nordquistsign.com
LETTERS
- 5" DEEP RETURNS PAINTED TO MATCH FACE COLORS
- PAINT COLORS AS NOTED
- 3/16" 2447 WHITE ACRYLIC FACES
- VINYL COLORS AS NOTED
ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS:
- 300' WL-2-12-W WHITE LIGHTING PINNACLE UNITS
- 7 - PSA-12-60 DRIVERS
- 3.71A@ 120V
ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND CONNECTION BY OTHERS
All design, manufacturing, reproduction,
use and sale of this document is strictly
prohibitied without the written consent
of Nordquist Sign Company, Inc. This
document is submitted under a confidential
understanding that the recipient of this
document assumes custody and agrees that
the document and any part of its content is
not to be copied, reproduced in whole or
part, or any of its contents be revealed in
whole or part to other parties except for
which it is agreed upon by Nordquist Sign
Company, I nc. and recipient, nor shall any
design features unique to this document be
incorporated in any other projects,
RETURNS: PMS 272C
FACE: A9460-T BRIGHT
PURPLE - AVERY
TRIMCAP: 2287 PURPL
INSTALL:
- STUD MOUNTED INTO SILICONE FILLED HOLES
NOT TO SCALE
SALES: RN
DESIGN: CH
DATE: 10.16.07
Ea.
I
REV 1: 01.10.08CH
REV 2: 02.20.08 HP
REV 3:
REV 4:
REV 5:
REV 6:
REV 7:
REV 8:
REV 9:
A
SIGN TYPE:
PC LETTERS
-l
P@]FVY Cot}'}
I
~
PARTY CITY
1851 MARKET DRIVE
STILLWATER, MN 55082
.....-'.
.:. ".: :. :.: .:..:.:....:..:.\1. ..:..:.:.....:.C.:.'...O.t.. .........:r:.... ." ,.........:.:
:.:::.:.:./::.:.:~.::).:::.:.:.:.~::.:.:~.::\ ..@]:O:..r:.....:......::...::).\.'.....O...:.:... : ..:./:-:.\::~:;.:/.:.:?:.:.\::~:;.:::.:
. . '. .... . . ..... , '" ". " .. ',' .' 1," '.' . " . '.' '.'
:..:.;. ::~:. <::: ::":.,:'. ~. ::~:. '::::'::':'::'. ::~:. ::-: ":":: ~:,::, ':~:' ;:.:.::.;. :':'.) ;".: ::' .:;:. <:> :::'::'. :':~' ';.::' ::\:.;' i;::.:..:: :.:.:' ::;:. ,;( ::\::.:' i~:. .;:.:: ::':.:.:
~
""
~
""
, :...... ." .' .'
,:.:..~:' .:.l~ : .:':::". '.:.:..:: ~. .:J:
.: .. .:....:. :.,: ".'
:":' ."... .....; .
.' ::.': :"~"., ." :: ::.
'. .:. ':' :-' .; .. .:. ':'
.' ....... .'
.. .
.. .... . .:..... '.'
. ". .... ".
. .
:...........: =.......
.. . .' . .. .
GD
ELEVATION
PAGE: 31.1
NOTES SPECIFIC TO THIS LOCATION:
. CENTER HORIZONTALLY AND
MAINTAIN BASELINE OF EXISTING LETTERS
NEWPAPER, LLe
. ..... .' .....
:.:.".:' :. .:..~ : .:':::". '.:,;..~ :. .:..~
: ." ::..:.:: :. .:'.. :' .'
. ...
. "..... .... . .' : '. '.
..........: .......
". . .' . .. .
APPROVAL:
. -. '. .. . . .
.' "':..' ..' ..":.
... . ':.: ......1'. '.':
=. .... ....:0. .; :, .:. ":'
PREVIOUS
DWG: 04-060 PARTY AMERICA
REF: PARTY CITY
JOB: 24777-31
". .' .... .."
. .." .
SCALE: 1/811 = 11.011
')
Memo
Community Development Department
To:
HPC
/J
~
From:
Date:
Re:
Michel Pogge, City Planner
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Parking Ramp Facade
Message:
Staff will present information to the Commission on the Parking Ramp Fa<;ade at your
meeting on March 3. It is anticipated that we will present a basic massing study on the
site.
Thank you,
Mike
From the desk of...
Michel Pogge, AICP . City Planner . City of Stillwater .216 N. 4th Street . Stillwater, MN 55082
651.430-8822 . Fax: 651.430-8810 . email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us
Memo
Community Development Department
To:
HPC
~
From:
Michel Pogge, City Planner
Thursday, February 28, 2008
South Hill Road Reconstruction Project
Date:
Re:
Message:
At the request of Jeff Johnson information on the South Hill Road Reconstruction
Project has been postponed to April's HPC meeting.
Thank you,
Mike
From the desk of...
Michel Pogge, AICP . City Planner' City of Stillwater' 216 N. 4th Street. Stillwater, MN 55082
651.430-8822 . Fax: 651.430-8810 . email: mpogge@ci.stillwater.mn.us