HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-01-05 HPC Packet
..
(Slill~ter-
-.-. -- ~
......... "-
~HF. BiFlTHPlA(f. !].l MiNN[Sn-(A J
Heritage PreselVation Commission
Notice of Meeting
Monday, January 5,2009
The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., Monday, January 5,2009, in the Council Chambers of Stillwater
City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF December 1, 2008 MINUTES
3. PUBUC HEARINGS
3.01 Case No. DEMj09-01. A demolition request for a detached garage located at 1004 6th Street
South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Ryan and Vanessa Mitchell, applicant.
4. DESIGN REVIEWS
4.01 Case No. 09-02. Design review of an accessory dwelling unit located at 1004 6th Street
South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Ryan and Vanessa Mitchell, applicant.
4.02 Case No. 09-03. Design review of signage located at 2510 Curve Crest Blvd in the BP-C,
Business Park Commercial District. Twin Cities Sign Images, Inc., applicant.
5. NEWBUSlNESS
6. OTHER BUSINESS
7. ADJOURN
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
December 1, 2008
Present: Howard Lieberman, Chair, Phil Eastwood, Gayle Hudak, Jeff Johnson, Larry Nelson
and Roger Tomten
Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge
Absent: Scott Zahren
Chair Lieberman called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Approval of minutes: The minutes of Nov. 3, 2008, were unanimously approved on a motion by
Ms. Hudak.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. DEM/08-54 A demolition request for a garage at 1225 Fourth St. S. in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. Christopher and Sarah Muehleck, applicant.
Mr. Muehleck was present. He explained their request to demolish a second garage on their
property. He said the garage is from a house that was destroyed in a fire; the proposal is
demolish and not replace the second garage. Mr. Johnson said he thought the application was
complete, with the exception of a firm cost estimate from a contractor. Mr. Muehleck said the
entire structure is collapsing, and the contractor was reluctant to give any cost estimate. Mr.
Tomten asked if there had been any response to the newspaper ad; Mr. Muehleck said he had
a couple of calls regarding possible salvage material, but noted there is not a lot of good
salvageable material in the structure. Mr. Lieberman noted that the Heritage Preservation
Commission takes all demolition requests under serious consideration.
Mr. Lieberman opened the public hearing. No comments were received, and the hearing was
closed. Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Eastwood, moved approval of the demolition request
as submitted; motion passed unanimously.
DESIGN REVIEWS
Case No. 08-55 Design review of final phase of Maple Island Development. Mainstream
Development LLC, applicant.
Vern and Tim Stefan of Mainstream Development were present.
Mr. Lieberman noted this is the fifth version of the proposed building that has been presented to
the HPC. The fifth iteration is a three story structure with a flat roof; the fourth version was a
three story structure with a gable roof, but was an infill structure which would have required a
height variance, he noted.
Tim Kuntz, attorney representing Mainstream Development, stated this is the last major
development for the former Maple Island site and the applicants are prepared to begin
construction with this final approval. Mr. Kuntz noted that the HPC had approved the general
design of the building on three occasions. He noted the exterior of the building has not changed;
the only change from the last proposal is a flat roof versus a gable roof. He stated the applicant
has reviewed the 17 conditions of approval and accepts and will meet those conditions.
"
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
December 1, 2008
Mr. Lieberman noted that this is not an adversarial situation and it is "atypical" to have an
attorney at the table. Mr. Lieberman pointed out that the HPC is not represented by counsel and
asked Mr. Kuntz to step from the table and sit in the audience. Ms. Hudak told the Commission
that Vern Stefan had contacted her by phone to remind her of the Dec. 1 meeting; other
members indicated they, too, had been contacted by Mr. Stefan.
Tim Stefan took Mr. Kuntz's place at the table. Mr. Stefan stated the site plan is unchanged,
except the new building is now 4' away from the adjacent structure. He stated the materials also
are the same - what has changed is the flat roof. Mr. Stefan reviewed the proposed building
materials and colors. He said there will be a wrought iron fence between the new building and
the adjacent building to the south. He said he is still concerned about the "punched down"
appearance and is trying to keep as much volume as possible on the first floor.
Mr. Nelson asked about trash storage. Mr. Stefan stated all trash would be enclosed inside. Mr.
Johnson noted an error in elevation in one of the maps - should be 629 rather than 692. Mr.
Johnson asked about the view from Pioneer Park. Mr. Stefan said they are trying to utilize
geothermal heat and believes they will be able to keep the number of condenser units at 6 as
shown in the drawings, but noted that mechanical design work has not been completed at this
time. Mr. Eastwood expressed a concern about the view from Pioneer Park and asked about the
possibility of having a low sloped roof to provide better screening of roof top units. Mr.
Lieberman asked how some type of roof structure for screening would impact the height
restriction. Mr. Pogge pointed out the residents of Stillwater Mills are opposed to any variance
for height. Mr. Stefan provided a sight section depicting the views from the Mills buildings,
noting that only residents of the top floors will have their view impacted.
Mr. Lieberman noted that this was not a public hearing but invited comments from the audience.
George Nelson, resident of Stillwater Mills and member of the Mills board of directors, spoke of
the loophole, a separation of 3' from the adjacent building, which allows the addition of another
story. Mr. Nelson reiterated concerns made at previous discussions regarding the view of the
structure to those driving into the City from the north; the view of the structure from the St. Croix
River; and the approved parking variance. Mr. Nelson questioned what say the City has in the
use and the viability of the project should the developers not be able fill the building with the
proposed office use and revert to retail instead.
Chris Angel, representing Dick and Judy Diedrich, residents of Stillwater Mills, was prepared to
address the Commission. Mr. Lieberman reiterated his position regarding attorney participation
in these proceedings and stated he would prefer that Mr. Angel not present any testimony.
No other comments were received, and the discussion was returned to the table. There was
additional discussion about the possibility of some type of roof structure to screen the
mechanicals. Mr. Pogge noted that ultimately that issue is a discussion between the Planning
Commission and HPC, and he pointed out the Planning Commission likely will be a "tough sell"
for any height variance. Mr. Johnson suggested it might help views if the north-south dimension
of the mechanicals are minimized; he suggested screening the equipment and keeping the
mechanical placement to one-fourth of the building dimension so there is more of a mechanical
penthouse, rather than having the units spread out on the rooftop. Tim Stefan said he thought
2
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
December 1, 2008
that might be possible and said he would be willing to come back to the HPC with a roof plan.
Mr. Tomten noted that the key to Mr. Johnson's suggestion is getting the mechanical design
completed. Mr. Tomten also stated he did not think larger screening would be more
advantageous regarding the view from Pioneer Park; he suggesting simply painting the
equipment to match the roof.
Ms. Hudak asked about the material/color of the garage doors. Tim Stefan said the doors will be
insulated metal doors perhaps with several view windows and will be the same color green as
the other building trim. Mr. Johnson asked about the color of the mechanical equipment and
screening. Mr. Stefan said the mechanical equipment will be the same color as the roofing
material and the screening will match the parapet color. Mr. Tomten asked about the rain
garden. Mr. Stefan said the rain garden is in the final plans as it is a requirement of the Middle
St. Croix Water Management Organization; he said he did not think the rain garden would
impact the patio or stairs.
Mr. Tomten moved to give final design approval as conditioned, striking conditions 1 and 2 with
the condition that the applicant come back to the HPC with a plan indicating the number and
location of rooftop units based on comments made at the meeting. Mr. Pogge asked if that was
a requirement prior to issuance of a building permit; consensus was in the affirmative. Mr.
Johnson asked about amending the motion to require that the mechanicals be kept to one-
fourth of the total building dimension. Mr. Tomten declined to formally amend his motion to
include that. Mr. Johnson asked that the applicant take that direction into consideration in
developing the rooftop plan. Ms. Hudak seconded Mr. Tomten's motion; motion passed
unanimously.
On a question by George Nelson, Mr. Pogge told those in the audience, there is a 10-day time
period in which to appeal this decision. Mr. Nelson reiterated several of his concerns,
specifically concerns about the viability of the project and possible change in use and the
parking variance. Mr. Pogge noted that any change in use would require the applicant to
request such a change from the Planning Commission. Mr. Tomten spoke to the difficulty of
trying to impose suburban parking requirements on a pre-automobile shopping district such as
downtown Stillwater, and he spoke to the need for flexibility in order to ensure economic
viability.
OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Pogge distributed meeting calendars for 2009.
Mr. Lieberman stated he will not be resigning from the Commission. Mr. Nelson said he has
decided not to seek reappointment and stated he has enjoyed his time working with the group.
Mr. Tomten said he is seeking reappointment to another term.
Mr. Eastwood asked about Mr. Lieberman's position regarding attorney participation. Mr.
Lieberman explained that he is not comfortable with having attorney participation as the
Commission does not have legal representation present. Mr. Lieberman said if the Commission
is notified in advance that someone will be bringing legal representation, the Commission could
ask that City Attorney Magnuson be present, in which case he would have no problem with
allowing that to take place.
3
"
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
December 1, 2008
Meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Lieberman, seconded by Mr. Eastwood.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Saker
Recording Secretary
4
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
December 30, 2008
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.: 09-01 and 09-02
Ryan and Vanessa Mitchell
REQUESTS:
1. Demolition Permit for a garage
2. Design Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit
LOCATION:
1004 6th St S
HPC PUBLIC HEARING DATE: January 5, 2009
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Plann#~
BACKGROUND
Ryan and Vanessa Mitchell, property
owners of 1004 6th St S, are requesting a
demolition permit for an existing garage
on their property. A building permit for
the structure was not on file at the City
office. Since there is no permit on file and
the garage appears to be over 50 years old,
it is by definition considered to have
potential historic significance.
Consequently, the Heritage Preservation
Conmussion is required to review the
demolition request.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not
being removed a new garage would not be subject to the infill design criteria. However, the
applicant is proposing to replace the garage with an accessory dwelling unit, which is
subject to HPC design review for consistency with the principal structure.
SPECIFIC REQUESTS
The applicant requests approval of a pernut to demolish the existing garage and a design
review pernut for an accessory dwelling unit that includes a two-car garage and an
accessory dwelling unit on the second floor.
'\
1004 6th St S
Mitchell Garage Demolition Pennit and Accessory Dwelling Unit Design Review
Page 2
,
EVALUATION OF REQUESTS
Demolition Permit
Chapter 34, Section 34-4 of the City Code states that "if buildings or structures are
determined by the community development director to be historic or potentially historic,
the application must be sent to the [heritage preservation] commission for review...
Buildings or structures determined nonhistoric must be referred to the building official for
issuance of a demolition permit."
A "nonhistoric structure or building" is defined by Chapter 34, Section 34-2 as a structure or
building less than 50 years old... Since the age of the structure could not be determined it is
assumed that the garage is over 50 years old; therefore, it is of potential historic significance
and requires review by the Heritage Preservation Commission.
Section 34-5 of the City Code lists nine items which must be considered prior to approval of
a demolition permit by the Commission.
(1) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its
property and with reference to neighborhood properties;
This information is included in the attached application.
(2) A legal description of property and owner of record;
Lots 9 and 10, Block 10 of Churchill, Nelson, and Slaughter's Addition to Stillwater
(3) Photographs of all building elevations;
Photos from various angles are included in the packet.
(4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be
demolished;
The applicant has indicated in the cover letter that the entire garage structure is proposed to
be demolished.
(5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including,
where applicable, data sufficient to establish any economic justification for demolition;
The applicant included a letter from CLH Construction that described the structure in poor
condition. The contractor estimated that it would cost $26,500 to repair the garage.
(6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on which the building or
structure to be demolished is located;
The applicant has indicnted that they wish to replace the garage with a new accessory
dwelling unit that includes a garage on the first floor and a living unit on the second floor.
I
,{
y
1004 6th St S
Mitchell Garage Demolition Permit and Accessory Dwelling Unit Design Review
Page 3
(7) Relation of demolition and future site use to the comprehensive plan and zoning
requirements;
The current comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is Single Family Small
Lot and is zoned RB, two-family residential.
This site is in the Conservation Design District; however, since the main structure is not
being removed a new garage would not be subject to the in fill design criteria. However, the
applicant is proposing to replace the garage with an accessory dwelling unit, which is subject
to HPC design review for consistency with the principal structure.
(8) A description of alternatives to the demolition;
The applicant has indicated the moving the structure or repairing it would be alternatives to
demolition.
(9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or
reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible.
The applicant has indicated that they have advertised the garage on Craigslist. A copy of the
ad has been included in your packet.
Design Review of the Accessory Dwelling Unit
The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) is specifically charged to review item g of
the accessory dwelling unit conditions as listed in the RB zoning district requirements.
Accessory Dwelling Units are permitted special uses in the RB district subject to the
following conditions:
a. Lot size must be at least 10,000 square feet.
The subject lot is 11,200 square feet.
b. The accessory dwelling unit may be located on second floor above the garage.
The proposed accessory dwelling unit is located on the second floor above the
garage.
c. The accessory dwelling unit must abide by the primary structure setbacks for side
and rear setbacks.
The proposed accessory dwelling unit is proposed to have a 62 foot rear yard
setback and a 10 foot side yard setback. The proposed setbacks meet the
requirements of the RB district.
, t
)
1004 6th St S
Mitchell Garage Demolition Permit and Accessory Dwelling Unit Design Review
Page 4
j
d. The accessory dwelling unit must be located in the rear yard of the primary
residence or be set back from the front of the lot beyond the midpoint of the
primary residence.
The proposed accessory dwelling unit will be setback 21 feet from the front of the
primary residence. The midpoint of the home is 20'8". The proposed location meets
the requirements of the code.
e. Off-street parking requirements for an apartment and single-family residence
(four spaces) must be provided.
The proposed accessory dwelling unit will provide the required four off-street
parking spaces with two spaces in the garage and a minimum of two in the
driveway.
f. Maximum size of the accessory dwelling unit is 800 square feet.
The proposed area of the living space in the accessory dwelling unit is 798 square
feet.
g. The application requires design review for consistency with the primary unit in
design, detailing and materials.
The applicant has provided plans for the proposed accessory dwelling unit. The
garage is proposed to have a cross gable roof with asphalt shingles. The renderings
indicate that the accessory dwelling unit will have lap siding similar to the exiting
primary residence. Since these details are not clearly noted on the plans staff
recommends this be made a condition of the approval.
h. The height may not exceed that of the primary residence.
The existing primary residence is a two story home. The proposed accessory
dwelling unit is also proposed to be two stories. The heights appear to be similar.
i. Both the primary and accessory dwelling unit must be connected to municipal
sewer and water services and be located on an improved public street.
Today, the primary dwelling unit is connected to municipal sewer and water
services. The property owner has verbally confirmed to City Staff that the accessory
dwelling unit will be connected to municipal sewer and water services. Since this is
not clearly noted on the plans staff recommends that this be made a condition of the
approval.
j. Maximum size of garage is 800 square feet.
The proposed area of the garage in the accessory dwelling unit is 798 square feet.
y
1004 6th St S
Mitchell Garage Demolition Permit and Accessory Dwelling Unit Design Review
Page 5
AL TERNA TIVES
The Heritage Preservation Commission has the following options:
1. Approve the demolition permit for the garage and design review for the new
accessory dwelling unit as presented with the following conditions:
a. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Heritage Preservation Commission.
b. The accessory dwelling unit shall be similar style, materials and color as the
primary dwelling unit. The City Planner shall review final plans for the
Accessory Dwelling Unit prior to issuance of the building permit.
c. The driveway to the accessory dwelling unitj garage shall be sufficiently
wide to provide two parking spaces in front of the garage and shall provide
surfacing as required by Sec 31-1-25(6)g of the Stillwater City Code.
d. The accessory dwelling unit shall connect to public sanitary sewer and water
serVIce.
2. Deny the demolition permit for the garage and design review for the new accessory
dwelling unit. If the Commission decides to deny the requests, findings of fact
substantiating the denial must be provided.
3. Continue the public hearing until the February 2, 2009 Commission meeting. The 60
day decision deadline for the request is February 17, 2009.
RECOMMENDATION
Review and take action on the request.
FINDINGS
The proposal, as conditioned, meets the intent of the City's zoning ordinance.
attachment:
Application and supporting documents from the applicant
Heritage Preservation Commission
Demolition Request Permit
Demolition Permit No.
Fee $100*
Address of Project: j DO~ loth ft S, Parcel No.: 33030cJD1~OJI([)
tJ.' Subdivision Chu.n:hill, Neb;;CVl { Sla LjJhfcrS Ac;!drf7a..
Lot 1 f I 0 Block I 0
Applicant: ~ i aM i Va 11 tr!, fA Maduf( .
. .-
Address: I DO f 0 th St. $'. Telephone No.: 152-27-1 ~ ~5 5(p
Owner if different than Applicant:
Address: -. Telephone No.
Type of Structure: A Ctr{t ~ - d..till d1 ~d COf1wtt ~ blAck li.CJ ~
r Vl'1 VtoWn. .
Age of Structure:? 50 Condltlon of Structure: 'Pcor - -CWlkt~ I will c;;tltAs !ln~ truss:a 0Jce roftilljl (LQr \Au:JQ w ~~
Intended Use of Site after Demolition: 13v'\ IJ 'Q r(lvriar V10lW- j lAD-r -€OJ.J-t of-
CA l}\i\ud~ ~V-Df ' I ttG:b ()fl. Cu.VW1t siif. W; \ Lk lv (rtO. ill yo-yo. ~r~C€
~~~i~o~~nt Date
/2/1 q/ of '
d" ~> - ~.
c.:- -- . ,
Signature of Owner Date
* After review and approval of the demolition permit request with the Heritage Preservation Commission, a
building permit must be obtained with the aty of Stillwater Building Department. The fee for the building
loermit is based on the valuation of the demolition project.
Office Use Only
HPC Review Date:
o Approved
o Denied
City Planner/Community Development Director
Date
December 19, 2008
City of Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission
Sti11water, MN 55082
Dear Memben of the Heritage Preservation Commission:
This letter is to request permission to demolish a 3 stall garage located at 1004 6"' Street South. Documents could not be located to determine the age of the structure,
At this time, we are not aware of any historic infonnation to include concerning the structme.
Following are the details for each of the required items listed in section 34-5,1 from the City of Stillwater Building Demolition Code:
I) A map showing the location of the building or structure to be demolished on its property and with reference to neighborhood properties - see page~
2) A legal description of property and owner of record
Lots 9 and 10, Block 10, Churchill, Nelson and Slaughter's Addition to the City of Stillwater, Washington Country, Minnesota
Ryan and Vanessa I\..fitchell, owners
hs of all buildin elevations
3 Phot
East facing elevation
West facing elevation
4) A description of the building or structure or portion of building or structure to be demolished
868 sq ft, 3 staII garage located in the southwest comer oflbe lot
5) The reason for the proposed demolition and data supporting the reason, including, where applicable, data sufficient to establi.h any economic justification for demolition
The garage i. dilapidated, The soffits and facia show signs of severe ro~ the concrete floor has extensive cracking and buckling, and the rear wall has required the addition of floor
jacks 10 support the roof
A contractor was contacted to detennine feasibility of renovating the structure, He determined the structure is too far gone to salvage, See pages 3-4 for bi.letter.
6) Proposed plans and schedule for reuse of the property on wbich the building or strncture to be demolished is located
A new carriage house will be built east of the current .ite of the garage, The .ite of current garage will be gra8./yard.
7) Relation of demolition and future .ite ose to the comprehensive plan and zoning requirements
The lot i. zoned RB Two Family Residential and is currently used as a .ingle family re.idence, The new caniage house will be built to plan and zoning requirements of an accessory
dwelling unit in the RB Two Family Residential district.
8) A description of alternative. to the demolition
One alternative is to .ell the building and move it off site (see #9) or to rehabilitate the current building (deemed infeasible by a contractor)
9) Evidence that the building or structure has been advertised for sale for restoration or reuse and that sale for restoration or reuse is not economically feasible
Property was listed for .ale on www,craigslist.org (http://minneapolis,craigsIist.orglfor!%3495484.htmI), No re8pOIl8es were received A contractor detennined that the condition of
the current building is 100 poor to consider restoration.
Sincerely,
Ryan and Vanes.a Mitchell
http://docs.google.comIDoc?id=drgf4z9_13cgpdp3gp&hl=en
12/19/2008
~.a:,"d':'",_l!!....., . --
,~
'\
'\
.
~g~ 'tl~ iil'g ~{l ~;;l ;j
:;:~~ ~- . '8 1il c. ,r t;j t;j
. @ 1 Q.f[l Ql Q. 1:3 ...,
a;g- ffi:E ~ ~ ~,>i iil 0 E Z Z tv
!Hi ~a<l~ 8.~ tv Z
=~ O~ !1-,.g_. < ::E!
w~~ if ~~g~~~f; en o' 1:3 1:3
~oc. '<(l)i:L:Es,m n ~
...,g P> :;-
gH tn~ ~f~i"~[m CD ~
--~ 8~r !i- 5' ;::;:
~a; ~ '" ~g HE. '< 1:3
NN-' g> Q.(')_~ III "Tl s: 1:3 0
~~~ ~~~Clg.~ <D ::E!
" ~ ~ 0
3 ! -<;. 5 ~"2. "0 ::E!
!!? ~.~~~~ iO
g -I> t;j t;j :0
0 - g ~'< g 0 ::E!
'" ~ Z tv
~. Z
CLH Construction
13536 33rd 51. 5
Alton, MN 55001
Ceo 612-860-5124
Fax 651-998-0761
E-mail clhconstruclion@aol.com
December 19,2008
Hi Vanessa,
The existing garage is beyond reasonable financial repair. The entire slab foundation is cracked beyond use of rebuilding a structure on top of,
as well as the structure itself. The walls are rotten and decayed, The soffit and facia are all in need of repair, The only thing that could really be
done for the structure is to jack up the roof and replace all the walls and the slab underneath, Which is not going to be cost effective, and the
roof is really not all that great in and of itself. The pictures will show the level of degradation.
Interior of west wall. Note the supports
Interior picture of cracked concrete floors. In some areas the floors have 6-inch height differences at these cracks,
Sagging west wall
~~
http://docs.google.comIDoc?id=drgf4z9_13cgpdp3gp&hl=en
12/19/2008
Facia on north facing wall
Sincerely,
Chris
http:// docs. google. comJDoc?id=drgf4z9 _13cgpdp3 gp&hl=en
12/19/2008
. . -- ~... ~b-
1011.
minneapolis crai~slist > ~eneral
email this postin~ to a friend
Avoid scams and fraud by dealing locally! Beware any deal involving Western Union,
Moneygram, wire transfer, cashier check, money order, shipping, escrow, or any promise of
transaction protection/certification/guarantee. More inf()
please It!g with care:
miscateaorizcd
-----~~
Free Garage (Stillwater)
prohibited
g,>an'!L()vemoSl
Reply to: sale-963495484(ZucraiQ:slist.org []
Date: 2008-12-18, 10:33PM CST
best ofcraiaslist
..-.........-...-..---_......_........_.....b_.____._
You move! 3 stall ~870 sq feet. Located in Stillwater.
I ~ :~_.
. I!l,
r-- -
.t~'~:'
r_~:~~{
~ .'
· Location: Stillwater
· it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 963495484
CLH ("';onstruction
113536 33rd 81. 8
i Afton, MN 55001
~ Cell 612-860-5124
~ Fax 651-998-0761
iE-mail c1hconstruction@aol.com
December 23, 2008
Hi Vanessa,
This is a statement for the city regarding your existing garage structure.
As per our conversation, here is an estimate for the repair of the existing
garage structure.
The items to be done to repair the garage are as follows
Jack the roof up to allow for removal of the walls
Remove walls and existing concrete slab
Replace concrete slab
Replace walls
Reset the roof
Replace siding, soffet and facia
Disposal
Estimated cost for the above repairs are approximatly $26,500
Case No:
Date Filed:
Receipt No.:
Fee: $25.00
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNIlY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and
supporting material submitted in connection with any application. Photos, sketches
and a letter of intent is required. All supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Fourteen
(14) copies of all supporting materials is required.
After Heritage Preservation approval, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day
appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a design review permit which must
be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits.
All following information is reauired.
PROPERlY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 100 4 ~ fl1 St S. Assessor's Parcel No. 3~ 03020 /20110
Zoning DistrictR8tAu.rv.i~ Q~~~~~ion of Project in detaillrdditiO'J1 of dltaLhgJ gOO
S~~i~~~D~ ~~ ~~Rto(kshOP O~ ~r>;Tfb- CtVlJ at). (JC~
III hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence
submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true
and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if it is granted and usedH
If representative i"slnot pro,p,e,rt;y ~w~1jt then property owner's signature is reauired.
\ UauR4Jtl y lit{ fc ktk'X
Property Owner '~~ Representative
Mailing Address/Oot b1l-r It. ~ Mailing Address
City State Zip %/lVJcrkr; ,A,1/J S50g'Z City State Zip
Telephone No. qS2~ 22) - +55(P Telephone No.
S:\P1anning\design re'view permitwpcl
April 12, 2002
Design Review Application and Checklist
'Ibis DesignReview Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Planning Application Form
Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-430-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St. Stillwater, MN 55082
www.ci.stillwateLnm.us
Project Addr~s:
I DD4- ~tl1 S-c S.
APPliapd; name, acJ4ress, telqJhone:
~~~ ;10~~St Mi-h~e II
...$.1\ 1\ W llitr, M I-J 55CX? "2-
1. N eigbbomood Architectural Styles:
~ Vernacular 0 ltalianate
o Queen Anne 0 Gothic
o Greek Revival 0 Second Empire
o AmericanFoursquare 0 Stick
o Other:
2. Prevailing neighbomood streetfront
setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3)
Prevailing setback on block (est.)
Average setback on block (est.)
Proposed new house setback
3. Is the pattern of homes in your
neighborhood 1,1-1/2, or2 stories high?
(Guidelines #4, #5)
Stories
House on right 0
House on left 0
House to rear 0
Prevailing on block 0
Prevailing opposite block 0
Proposed new house 0
4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your
neighborhood: (Guideline #13)
Front Porch
o
o
D
D
D
D
1
House on right
House on left
House to rear
Prevailing on block
Prevailing opposite block
Proposed new house
Notes:
f-J IA
II
1-1/2
2
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
o
o
D
oN/A
None
o
o
o
D
D
D }J[A
(p 1 of2)
5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in
yourneigbbomood: (Guidelines #10, #11)
Front Rear Side
Garage Garage Garage
o $' D
D Ii(' D
D 0 R'
Prevailing on block 0 J9' S
Prevailing opposite block 0 &a' ~
Proposed new house D D ~
House on right
House on left
House to rear
6. Prevailing Garage Size in your
neighbomood: (Guidelines #10, #11)
1 stall 2 stall 3 stall
Garage Garage Garage
House on right .& D D
House on left O.:!iit D
House to rear 0 a:: D
Prevailing on block D ..e( 0
Prevailing opposite block 0 ~ D t;#l~ 2 sh I Ls
Proposed new house 0 D .m:
~isible- M. siYeet
7. Is the proposed garage compall'ble in
form and detail with the design character
of the main house? (Guideline #14)
~~ - gimilar matf/liaiLJ anL
ri f1;~ .f~h11vHA wud tv mix-IrA--
of Y-, $ 'Ilq pn fJ1a 11-1 r LS /tl1 (.1 ce..
8. If t41e proposed structure/garage
location, setbacks, size or general design
character does not fit prevailing
neighborhood patterns, how do you
propose to reduce its impact on the
neighborhood and streetscape? :
tJlA
.
Stillwater Conservation District
Design Guidelines
Design Review Application and Checklist
9. Does the proposed structure work with
natural slopes and contours of the
property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8)
D Structure sited parallel to slope
D Building deigned to reduce cut and fill
(minimized retaining walls)
D Landscaping incorporated into grading
changes, I .
Notes: ~1~lfYl~ ~~t:~~ bt r~ru,
No lVt~o o~ . i if.
10. Are there significant trees on the
property? Will any trees be removed or
damaged by new construction?
(Guideline #9) )
" Types of trees ~ tJiS ( :2
D HeIghts 6 V
D Trunkdiam. 10 i/1 C~e.)
Notes: OI1R iree ~JR k aVlIovtt;( f anoTher
\Nd\ bL ~QVt~ \ rOS<;ib[t-
Good Neighbor Considerations
1. Will the proposed structme significantly
affect your neighbor's access to sunlight in
adjacent yards, patios or rooms?
(Guideline #21)
House to right: tJ D
House to left: I'J 0
House to rear: tJ 0
Notes:
How will you mitigate any negative SlmHgbt
impacts on neighbors?
D Locate structure on lotto minimize impact
D Adjust building height, or portions of
building, to minimize impact
D Other:
Stillwater Conservation District
Design Guidelines
2. Will the proposed structme significantly
affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines
#22, #23)
House to right:
House to left:
House to rear:
Notes:
fJo
0~
How will youmitigate any negative impacts
on neighbors' privacy?
D Offset/locate windows to reduce impact
D Use obscure glass in window
D Locate balconies to minimize impact.
D Use landscaping elements for screening
D Other:
3. How is outdoor lighting impact
minimized forneighbors?(Guideline #25)
" Lights are located or directed away from
neighboring property
i- Lightfixtures are shielded to prevent glare
at neighboring property
D Other:
To be included with this Application and
Checklist:
D Site Plan: include location of proposed
building(s) on property, lot area; indicate
impervious surface, property lines, street!
sidewalk location and approximate
location of adjacent structures. Indicate
proposed outdoor decklpatio and
landscaping features.
o Building Plan: dimensions, first floor area
square footage.
o Building Elevations: indicate building
height, windows, materials, and color on
all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior
lighting.
o Photographs of site and streetscape.
o Regular Planning Department
Development Application Form
(p 2 of2)
December 19, 2008
City of Stillwater
Community Development Department
Stillwater, MN 55082
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is in response to the design review of an accessory dwelling unit at the residence of Ryan and Vanessa
Mitchell, 1004 6th St South. The 1 st floor of the proposed structure will be garage and workshop space. The 2nd
floor will be storage and living quarters. The living quarters will be used by guests.
The exterior of the building will be finished in Hardi Plank lap siding to match the primary residence. Also, in
keeping with elements used on the primary residence, asphalt shingles will be used on the roof, double hung
windows, and a wood garage door will be installed.
There are 2 major trees on the site. Both are maple trees, 30-36 inches in diameter, 50 feet tall. One tree will need
to be removed for construction. We do not have plans to remove the second tree. Please refer to the plot map for
location of said trees.
There is little to no impact on adjacent uses or areas. All zoning requirements for an accessory dwelling unit are met
for the RB Two Family Residential District.
We have included 3-D conceptual drawings.
Kind regards,
Ryan and Vanessa Mitchell
c'\~~':;r'5 ,'" .r' ,', ,,,.; , ',;;"f: .",' , .""',, "J,' " '.', ,>' .,',..,.'" ','.",".,. ,":. ,
,,",' '.... " . ',;,-,,,,<:',-,;,, ' ,.,,' ';,<'>,,'
:-io\ ',!;:, ",., ,." ',.,,~, . .,.",.. , ' :,"-: /,,'<L
7;,' ,',,'. .'.; ":'.' '<,uv,,'<. ,':",
" ',,', . J;;~
~ . '. .' . . .
d'a.'5rJ,: ", ., ;" ' "",: "x;, ;':"" '.,",;
'\J'- ':: ,- " . "" ,', '.'" ", ,'"
Ii,l. ,y"; .. . .... '.. . .., .......t. ...... ..... 73' 2"
'y 'I...?\;...Y"';'..,; ..f.;;"':: .;.;.;;..:,";'i: .. ..'..,.. "ll">'
"t 1"'Jy.\r";:.. ......!. .......... . {;C'/ ./. . . .,.
'hi <');; "'X,' '",' , ",f" " 'j..
,.W','; ~~l .........)7' . ... (. .....
" c-:c' " 'i'}';" --::z""..",,', .',.."" ,'"
. 'J r lPrtipo;&:t:,>e';'" " :,;d;e",..,:,:,,; , ""',
1'6" ~.:t~n~'!~'..": . .... . H',1~~5'
'. " ,7" "i!:?21~,;:;',;,,;2?',?:: ~:Jf1;:(i"";24f,, l:i.n;,"~, .,~ 3'
, .."..,,', 'ii:.\ ' }:";\:>;.;~>-",,t;l['''.,(,;. 'x;'....' ,., ,'}',;,)\~
"; ,'-:';,:'" ';, ';,c'.,,:,:.: ,,<<; ,.,' ,:,-.."": ,<>:,.':;"",/'.',,' ,
,.}y,; <,," ,.. ..,.,,'. , ,'.,.' ,.' ." .'. i',;', ,,' ':. ',"
. ..." It ;::';:f',,,:'~ iq,'i:;~ Si:",.",..", , , ;';
10'..--., ,L.'" ."... .,,~ ',," ,',.
.,..... " "" ,:' ',"''.\/>'.:'.i .,,',..,;\ ":;::) ',,:.}
>":~ ,:, ..' . ,':', ::,,;:,:"'l<':"i ",:>':' ;;:?::.iX';
".;>: l:>riV~W{H/":' ")1' ' ,T'~<<:; (W;.;: :",.,.';;':,1\,'
,',.,\': :. <7.1 ,."" 16', t' F',.fY10fl(, ');, ::
", I.;,.,~.,:i:/:;,i",":<';; '/: ') ~ ',".',11" l&sJ4 ef1[(i,"':'
I ,'. K, .,~~'\..,;: \;c'~'.: ..:;:;: i'j{":'J~ ,-;' 5
..... I ~r.;~G~y;.\'Q:,~ : [";:', i;:.;;t;~')'
.,~t:/,7. ",' ,.<,;i, :~:~,.,;:: ;<> ,:/ ::.: ,.'..
,< :",,;~:,>:./;, .',.. .;.:/\: ".'k,' ',', 'dU'",
,? :;;<:;,,;;',,\:,.;;:;: ,'j', ,:,{;':, .";,,,/,t,';" ;,' ,,\;,;'.,;
.) ,;;:.'\'; ';'::;~,; <i,L' .',.. '1'/:J~I;r:';f"~~';';:,.tri.:,;/,",';~.;- :'::; i'"
, '.' ,,' ,,,:':-'\:'i:';,L/;'J::2:"'P:>;,';:, ...~,::i:' :(,:)-;;;:,"'; ,,\
;~';;; . ,.' ;i,,' "\""::,,,>""c':',;.,.';'\/: , "i,:;,,;S
Y. ,:'.' ','.. " ,i;:',..",<", ..',/,.,.:.'.: 1.\.' "":,',' ,"<'... '\, '. ':
.,.",';". ,."...'.,:,.;" ,;",'";',, 1"':'.<<//1 "..','-',',..' ','",i",:,
".:e.",,-,,,.>,;. ",'.",,;, '..,.,-': "," ',' :". ":".,,"';,, , ".,"'",'-'"," " ..,.,,<'. ...."',,."..'; .'-.::"
V';",i,:{ "'~';'/',:{:;,,:,t:r',,><'::':);, "",, 'c,i." "'sir);}} ',J.. ..'".' ,..j.,,'
, ',', ~;? ;-t'lI"'~" ','::</'; ;;':/:: ,<'::~';i "'.:}': ' ",)3,'''>::
x". ,:.,;,.. v,:, -: 'i"':>::"';':' :, ',,": ',j':", "'" "",Oi .' ""::',,>,1':::
. .
" '." "
. ' ,
^t,Li' '-t ,;,"
*t v\j ~ UVL , .',",
,:'::::.".',G~~~.:..:..,
"",!,~:
;:. ".:,>;'
" ,"
,'" '
." ~
>6f: IOn " ,
"'{,:;/',' "
',,' ,:"A~ auvrt;,
.."",. :" ~idence
,- , " <,'. "
" :,',' \,">
:(',,'- '. ",,; '. '"..:.,
.': '
"
"
j~ j~
"
;
, ,
""'.' ,,'
tJ-r
:"";
.''{, ,".' .
,
,.
.. --"--'-'---. ,- ~ - ... '219J..'VM"1"'l'lq ~ ~
. N!--I
, f---, ~
. ~
~ ~,!J ----:-'--..---I1.l1"ld5~ iU.~" :z ~
\ '"
~ .Vi ~ ~ -
rill' ---- . -- '----""1"'r~-".~@I'l'" j\' * NiJ.-'z} -< i
r+ f ! ~ J
Q .. a
~
7
I
I
/B
I
I "
\, --'-l i ~ fIJ
\ :I~
\ ~..
\ ~.....
\
~
...'
,"
v
N
~
II
E
t;:
II
;,
~
it.
i
.,.
..
~
-s
2
~
of'
4
:z
:i:
'"
~
...
:t:
1
2
:l
\')
~
~
J ~~
\
'" -
12 ,\
t\~
:2-
oL
)-
~
~
CD
!!~
l""
= -----h.--------.---'.-.'.h.-nH.'1l3J.:yf'1IIlJ.0 -.- ~ )
b i
. ~
! -----...... ..... - --...-------.------ .. . --,-- \\ ~ .,
"'-; , ~ ~ ~
~ t-J \l\
~Tf-;:7np-...~a1'lvJ'\t.~ 'f ! i ~ I
a ., 0!5 is
21
~
}
'ol i
.\-
.o-,tz,
I.
,
i
2
, ~,
III
C
-4.
tt.
\S
el
...
;5'
:E
~)
~~
~,;;!:.
',~ .
'~r
I
-1'1[
~,
I---;:-:.~ -::::----=.~:- ~,~ .~, ", ~ I
:.' . .~_. .;-r-..... -,".. .. . . ., " "
,': I ! ~ I:; I
L: I ~ 1 f ,": .p-:;..
,::.; I .~.~~ '; I
' -1\ '" .
I:':' I ~~~ ';
I~ I ('I: I
I:: I ~ III
I,:: I ~ ~ ; ~ I! I
I~I fu~ ~$~ _,:1
lili~ ~il I::..~I
I:' I u ~ Il. - ll. ~ .sJ I: I
I~ '.: I ~ i ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I
:', I :t:../t' ..) 'll ~ :' I
, -l\S" " ,
I:: I :::+~ ~
I ; ,~,-;: :-:-.- - ::;"<.~::-. -:;, .,.,' .:1 I
I I
, I
! I
~ I
j I
;
'\:)
~
&C) .~
-~ -
~
....If"\-~
,,';'-,~\
..a-,~Z-
.1hQ1-, "
,P-.1.
I
I
.
I
I
,a-, t..z.
.. -zl3.1'tJ'1\"IJS7 ~ .~
. NH \ !
--'.. ~ ~
! ..-- . .--- ~
- \ ~ ~ ~
~ U\
; - .... ' ----, """''3H'?J..r~' 't~<lrN!\ 'F N'I}..'i! -- .._ >.n. -! ! ! I
Q .. ~ is
2\
.~
\L
~ ::/-,'1=
~
'7 .
~ ~
.-J -'
\\
:z '....
<.=-
L
~ .
Ii
~~.
i/
f(
~
R
-~
~..~;:i
...-..
c.J
1:-- c; is
A'J (?
(>-
'0
\
\
l,
I;
01.
~
u.
~
~~
\S:.-
'*
.
=
, 'eo
tl _\
.~ ~
- I<'
~
;i'
=
i--------:=r=--'
I =:
I ~ I
I.~ ~ I
I.~ -'- I
1- I
'0
\
vQ+I ."il- 'Z.i"'~' Z
...... '?Z
..a-,~
I
I
.
I
I
"o-._~
,..
.
", N ~ - . Zf;;lJ.:1 Mil Ij..ci
~ 'c
, ',::l ~
~ '+ ~ ~ v
jT! ~ I
!
~
.
z
Ii
i
"1'131t?.J..q....j ~,*3N"1f'\ f' rh')..)l
o
II~
l~
.,<::-, 'Z .cl
~
~t c -1\
~ "
::Jj ~ #
t;~
u:...
0
Q 0 I
,(7
^\
,'"
""
- ~ "" --
I/)~l ~
~ '\:I
,
-
~~.t.,,-
'~_,~
-... .. '..""
-
II
'a
_\
, \S\ =~
.\)
.~ - -- I ..~
.. \ -1:\
~ II .. ,
\\I ..\
..,.
_.-. ..-..-....-.-..
'0
) ,
--
-
J
I ~I
,
=.
i ~I
i
I
1 " ,
I
i
"a-,'?\ .~-:7..\
,,-,'1f3 ,,~~
."'--:I..Z
I
I
.
I
I
~
..
----,.,----I'f~j..n'l1'Lli7 1:\ ~~" .."
~- :\ :z ~ ~
'--..c;.-'-?JJ;;..-if1.....,-~t4>OJ--.- d:I -
~~~~\.0 \0
--n~'7J...1 V1 'V~H'1l\ trr~-- I ! i <l i
Q " c!5 '! ji 0
..
~
l!l
i
't"
-\fI
1\\
~
~
~ M
-.8 ~
,;
J. 11.\lI
~~
~~i4
j~~
~
1:>,
,J\ -ll "&
:z. ;; ....
CI~: . ~
i;<~.j
~tl i ~ ~ \5
:l2~~ "-tli~ ~ z
~ M j- \=.
..Li';:,jI ~~;li ~ ~
\;) :s~ ~~~~
"- ::l "&, 11
~>L~~ N~ >4
~r~~ ~::l~\ ~ ~
x.-'", - U\
\Jl (=' tJ \'l{l=
-\-I
~
/
/
..';'/11 -.<;; \lI ~ uS-."
\\l
~ :R~ $ oL
cO =>
'" .l\ .c. :::l ~
~ t-~ ...
~ \- ~
..;, \l) "f < ,.)
1>\ \lJ :z.
-~ ..J~ .... ~
.... ......
.3 . " ~
'i 0_ ~
~
~ 'f-
~
.;r
...
::I
~
~.
~
.~-."
. Y,t"Z
......',1 ~.1.
North
SIcU.
VI i!.-vJ
Ai
J
Sov~
siaL> View
t
N
~'I(W ~ struJ
R e..Clr \/;-tvJ
cStillwate~
..~~--:::~ .~
-...-.-- -- """,
~--.~ ,
"Ht" BIH'HP~ACr OF- MiN}~r.;;'OlA ,J
Heritage Preservation Commission
DATE:
December 29,2008
CASE NO.: 09-03
APPLICANT:
Jim Cunningham
REQUEST:
Design Review of proposed signage for Cunningham's Sports
LOCATION:
2510 Curve Crest Blvd W
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT:
BPC - Business Park Commercial
ZONING: BP-C Business Park Commercial
HPC DATE: January 5, 2009
REVIEWERS: Community Dev. Director
PREPARED BY: Michel Pogge, City Planner1~
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for a new wall sign for
"Cunningham/s Sports" at 2510 Curve Crest Blvd. This sign will be placed directly
west of "The Edge Performance Hockey Training" sign that was approved by the
Commission in November. These signs replace the former St. Croix Bike sign. The sign
will be comprised of individual red channel letters for "Cunningham's" and individual
blue channel letters for "Sports". The proposed sign is proposed to be 4/ tall by 6/ wide
for a total of 24 square feet in size.
For retail wall signage the West Business Park design standards provide that the
signage shall be consistent with the Sign Ordinance. The zoning ordinance states that
for a wall sign, 'the gross surface area of a wall sign may not exceed one square foot for
each foot of building, parallel to the front lot line'. The applicant's retail space has
approximately 85 feet facing Curve Crest Blvd. The total sign area of the proposed sign
is 24 and the approved "The Edge Performance Hockey Training" sign is 23.3 square
feet. Together these signs are smaller than the square footage allowed by the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval as conditioned.
2510 Curve Crest Blvd vV
Page 2
CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage
Preservation Commission.
2. No additional signage.
FINDINGS
The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines. The
proposal meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance
attachments: Applicant's Fom1
Elevation Drawing/Photo
",
Case No: \>\2-\~;fE
Date Filed:} 1
Receipt No.: otf;J73
Fee: $25.
DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms
and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All
supporting material (i.e. photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application
becomes the property of the City of Stillwater.
Fourteen (14) copies of all supporting materials are required.
All following information is required.
3:2-0 60)0 ;;01/0--
00 t; Lf
I /
~~~
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and
evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the permit if
it is granted and used"
If representative is not property owner, then property owner's signature is required
Property Owner .:rAW! e.$ (! , ~{.vv Representative J I W\ L!. '-' V\ \A t lU~ i-k4w\
Mailing Address I { I 7 (t 1.(..1' (! r' ,..~L e Mailing Address ct< 5'; D L!012U&;L!RE5T 8L V/4
City State Zip II- l.A.1>>;v, tAl r. ~"~/((p City State Zip c:5l7LLLL~e~/ /J1j./ 55~2...
,
Telephone No. C l'tL &/2. - S-9~.. Y3/S' Telephone No. (051- 4 55-0 L(.7 ~
Signature c3~ r;;<~ Signat~~~
H:\mcnamara\sheila\sheila\design review permlt.wpd February 5, 2003
~ ~ .
~
(~til~!e~
-e,. ~~'~"c,;'\. \ t, !>.l:....~<: ~* l
Application for Si~n Permit
Fee: $50.00
Community Development Department
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
651-430-8820
Location of 5i n
Address City
::b7t!J ~v;.t.2L.I~ c:"/.Zi3T 8'LVO Stillwater
A Iicant
Name ..,.... .:- /' I, /L . "--<' I
/'YJ4JZt.::. 1Z4' Ct/-e:;:. -= I """,-0 //:J'1;<rc:-L:::::~ IlvG
Address +<- ~ City
'7;l..d i u~-A~ oJo oSSc?C
Owner if differen.t from A lieant
Name dlt./4/1/ /<-,/':;:/~Y) ~Z1:.s 'J,l/i1 e~i
Address ~5i () dtl;Zt.!b &?E'~T $u/ City...:;,?/, ,-L--- L.d .-?-.T2d~
Contractor's Name
Name , I _..!-
.s/G~ //?/~es ////~ ;iZ/:;2--/c/-r-G /lZL-o
Address , -;L",,A-,-. /. City <c -~, State / Zip ..-?-LC
/7;;<LJ) //3' -~ d./u t:/-"SCLJ /M./V s. --S..;;><::::7 -
Attached are the following documents (Required to be submitted with application)
Zip,
55082
Phone#''7/_'?__I-7o ---c.>c'
/tp,? {.?ZJ --157/
State, _ /' Zip ~---:?'/
/n/,--, :5 >..:;>=
Phone # " j
&::>/ - -r
Stat~__.u / Zip <:::: - 'h/7
/' F'--' .......::::> 0 v 4.--
, Attach a plan showing the sign size, location and type of material used, If the sign is to
be mounted on the building, show an elevation of the building and sign, Additionally, if
the building is historic the sign mounting shall limit damage to the exterior of the building.
Design Review application (if required), All signs in the Downtown Area and in the West
Stillwater Business Park re uire desi n review b HPC.
5i n Details
Sign Size: Dimensions:
o
?j/
Setbacks: From Property Line
x hi
From Bldg
= Square Fee~~ Sign Height: (If freestanding)
From Driveway/Parking Lot
Colors:)?6"L? 8V4t:::'/L
Illumination: ~,y es
Materials: ./fJ..?-d /11 ,At! ~
If Yes, Type: / - ~
LeCJ L..LJu..J ~6c..-l7'?-~
$l::g;- /~,7,7.?.?e" /k-'
o No
Declaration
I hereby certify that the information provided in this application is true, correct and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief. I hereby authorize the City of Stillwater and any agent or
employee of it, to inspect the proposed site at any reasonable time before and after any permit is
issued related to this request.
Owner Signature (required)
Date
Date
By
Condition? for approval:
* Contractor must be licensed with the City of Stillwater. Contractor's license application form
is available at Stillwater City Hall.
Remember to call Gopher State One call at 651-454-0002 before you dig to
identify any underground utility locations. This is a FREE service.
S:\Planning\Forms\Application for Sign Permit.doc Updated: September 23, 2006
-
-"tJ
j:jrn
~(I)
~G)
~<
=r
)>rn
cr; ::tJ
~ (I)
(0 .
Zto
~ c::
. -
(j)r-
c tJ
~m
-"::tJ
~(I)
. .
-
02:
(j)C/)
(j)-1
8):,-
r-
s:::r-
zm
::tJ
01(1)
01
Wo
0)-.,
co -.
::.
. q)'
:::J.
........0
"l ....,
~Qo
.........(0
+>-x
N......
CXl(O
I ::::J.
-"0
01....,
COCr)
co -.
cg
'TICr)
~'6i
+>-q)'
N:3
@l
-~
~ ~ n
if ~- ~
.... ~t\l
{f It "<
f~f
:::1 ;:j..
- :::1
~ ~
en
'TIlC
1>> ::s
!:l.~
1>> ::s
a.
t
~
<
~
<::.
....
~
)0
OJGl::O
'om
C,o
mo~
::O-f()
!!j::!!m
cS:C/)
::0
Z
C/)
-.j
hi~
0;:;:
c'
cg.~
g.~
co;:;:
(/)1>>
~<<g
;-::0
3m
o
/
OJ :Dc,,)
s'ot5'1>> .
Q:::ii).go
.a!!l.~~m
mo a.~"O
"",::I"
tp
Q~l~i!~~
~~~g'~~&~
~1O' ~~~'< ~~
!e. :: a. ~ ~ ~ ~~. en I\) 0) S::
<g,~ ~Siii'3" O'~ ... U1 ~ 3
~~!~g~~g =...... I
~:"~~~~!i'O c:: 0 ,1::0. (')
:i ~ hH:igfQ-o ~ < (') U1 s::
SO,a-gg;;;.'gffi3' a U1:J
20@'O;::O:-3g(tl ~ c: I ...
.....;(OCD..... Q)a. \11 .., 0 oJ
~. (Da. f[~,:;.g ;; g. _""I <; .... ::;"
~ en ~ ro en <n <no CD" ....,
h [o~:..~,<g ~ -...( CO
a:~~~~~;:Jg'n Z 0,1::0. ::T
~~"---<il S>>
~og.?~;;;:s* CD (') 3
5-;<g" 0::> $1 a. en
~ ~ ~gg-~g'~ - S!!..
~~'ii'il$.g~! tD _
"'-3"'g"'::I"::> _ en
::ii,:g !!,<i5' ::1":;0" < U1
~;; ~a~~ [ a. ......
~b~J!lQo~~ J:,.
~15.g~~;;~ CD
=- g ~~!!.g !!!.~ I\)
iJ ~ g,~[~~<g 0,
~ g- ?Q5'H-: en
:"g.5'''~g.161l -...(
15 '!l .;!-< a. ex>
.~
.....
.
G>;:u
Om
50
~~
-. ()
3m
~t
rm~
(1)-
::q~ >
tll"",E'
O()2.
I>> ::I"::s
C'll>c
5'S 3
a~
~
!!l.r
~~
~<
Co
i-;::;
. I>>
"tICO
Otll
~()
(1) 0
~a:
ll>
~
""'!
..
--I"Tl
Is.
m~
m~
C<g
(;)61
m""'
)0
........
.....
---
.....
co
'0
.p.
(")
C
Z
Z
Z
G')
I
)>
s:
~
e.
r
co
-
-
co
....
(")
o
::J
C/)
-
....
c
~
o
::J
en
'0
co
C'l
C/)