Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-02-28 PRC Packet jLL '. ~H~~te~ THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~ STILLWATER PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD MEETING NOTICE FEBRUARY 28, 2005 The Stillwater Parks and Recreation Board will meet on Monday, February 28,2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 216 N. 4th Street AGENDA ~ 1. Approval of January 24,2005 Minutes 2. Election of Offices 3. Palmer Property Parks/Open Space/Trail Plan 4. McKusick Lake Trail Extension 5. LumbeIjack Committee Update, Rob 6. Stonebridge Playground 7. Park Planning Updates a. Schulenburg Park b. Settler'sGlenPark c. Munkelwitz Property 8. Other Items CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800 r 11 ,', STILLWATER PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD JANUARY 24, 2005 Present: Linda Amrein, vice chair David Brandt, W,!lly Milbrandt, Cathy Sewilo and Sandy Snellman Others: Community Development Director SteveRussell Absent: Paul Dona and Rob McGarry Vice Chair Amrein called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Approval of minutes: Ms. Amrein asked that the minutes of Dec. 20, 2004, be changed to reflect that Gary Kriesel was absent. She also asked that the reference tq, the Courage Center in the discussion of the Mary Rita Trail be changed to Courage St. Croix, rather than the Courage Center. Mr. Milbrandt, seconded by Ms. Snellman, moved approval of the Dec. 20, 2004, meeting as amended. New members David Brandt and Cathy Sewilo introduced themselves. Stonebridge playground request Scott Kneeskern, a representative of the Stonebridge PT A Community Playground Committee, addressed the Board asking that the Board consider some level of financial assistance and a resolution of support for the project. Also in attendance were the Committee fund-raising co-chairs, Rich Tregilgas and Bev Bergstrom. Mr. Kneeskem pointed out that the existing play structure at Stonebridge Elementary School is nearly 30 years old, is deteriorating, and cannot adequately serve school students let alone the surrounding community. Portions of the structure have been removed due to safety concerns. The PTA Committee's goal is to raise $192,000 for new handicap-accessible playground structures that will serve both the school and the community as a whole. The Committee has reached the 60 percent mark in its fund- raising goal. Mr. Kneeskem noted that Stonebridge is located in a part of the Stillwater community that has no significant playground/park for children to walk or bike to or is handicap- accessible. He called the requested financial support "fiscally responsible" and a "strong investment," one that would "foster a strong community" through play. Ms. Amrein questioned a statement in the project brochure that the new structures would be the largest handicap-accessible structures in the county. Mr. Tregilgas and Ms. Bergstrom said they thought that statement was a reference to the minimum requirements that such equipment be 25 percent accessible. The new Stonebridge equipment will exceed minimum requirements - 33 percent of the structure will be handicap-accessible. i" · I Mr. Milbrandt noted that with the City's closing of Staples Field, this request was not totally unexpected. He asked about the status of the Community Development Block Grant the City has submitted with this project in. mind. He also asked whether a basketball court was part of the Committee's plans. Mr. Kneeskern stated there are no plans for a basketball court at this time. Ms. Snellman also referred to' the lack of park/playground facilities in the Stonebridge neighborhood and spoke of considering this request in the context of the community as a whole. Mr. Russell stated he had contacted Mr. Dona and Mr. McGarry for any comments they might have regarding the meeting agenda. Mr. McGarry is an advocate for ba~ketball due to the closing of Staples Field. Mr. Dona expressed a concern about this request considering the Board's position regarding the similar request from Oak Park Elementary School parents, as well as the fact that financial support for the Stonebridge* project is not a budgeted item for 2005. Ms. ' Amrein asked it the City would have a problem giving money to a school district project. Mr. Milbrandt noted this is not a school'district undertaking, this is a non-profit organization. Mr. Russell noted that the €ity has participated in other school partnerships - contributing to the Oak Park School equipment and putting some play equipment both at the Old Athletic Field and the former Washington School. There was a question about the Committee's timeframe. The goal is to have funding committed by April 15. The equipment is scheduled to be installed, by volunteers, on Aug. 20. Mr. Brandt asked what would happen if the Committee doesn't achieve its fund- raising goal. Mr. Tregilgas responded that the structure will be built, but might have to be scaled back. Ms. Amrein asked if it would create a problem if older kids used the facility should a basketball court be included in the project. Committee representatives noted that the school/playground is a community asset and is used after school for many functions and by many people. Ms. Amrein said she hopes the City will look favorably on the request. She noted that it would cost more to include basketball in the Stonebridge plans and suggested that, if possible, the City fund that extra cost plus additional financial assistance. Mr. Milbrandt spoke of the "sense of support" among Board members. He noted that while this project is not included in the 2005 budget there is money in the city's capital budget, which could be redirected. He brought the discussion to a close by suggesting that the request be brought back to the Board's February meeting for a full board discussion. In the interim, Mr. Russell will check on the status of the Community Development Block Grant and Administrator Hansen will be asked to look at possible funding sources. Brown's Creek Park and Natural Area master plan I .... , l Mr. Russell introduced Sherri Buss and Anna Nelson of Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates, the consulting firm that has been selected to assist the City in preparing a master plan for trails, parks and open space in the area between Brown's Creek Park and Nature Preserve and the City's Public Works facility. Ms. Buss said the goal is to have the plan cOIIlpleted by July so implementation of the plan can be included in the next year's. budget process. She outlined nine project tasks: update the Brown's Creek Park and Nature Preserve Plan which was completed several years ago; develop recommendations regarding interpretation of the farmstead, woodland and natural communities; complete a design for development of the recently-acquired Munkelwitz property as a neighborhood park; develop recommendations for trail connections from the Brown's Creek park/nature area to the Public Works. Facility as well as to the Palmer property; make recommendations for the development of the open space and cemetery area adjacent to the Public Works facility; work witl! City staff to develop a proposed maintenance schedule and cost estimates for the master plan areas; develop informational and interpretive signage, trail maps and brochures for parks and trails in the project area that could serve as a prototype for other City trails/parks; develop design options for identifying park and open space property boundaries; conduct a workshop for City maintenance staff focusing on maintenance of natural areas and related issues. ~ Ms. Nelson showed graphics of several typical neighborhood parks that Bonestroo had prepared plans for. Much of the discussion centered on development of the "neighborhood" park at the Munkelwitz property. Mr. Milbrandt questioned the term "neighborhood" park. He suggested this will be a popular destination and should be considered more of a "community" park, which requires a different kind of input in developing the plan. Other members agreed with that assessment. Ms. Amrein said this whole planning area will draw people, not just from the immediate neighborhood area, and she agreed that "neighborhood" park is too low a profile. Mr. Brandt pointed out that the provision of parking is a consideration in defining the scope of a park, neighborhood versus community or regional. Ms. Buss then asked what areas should be included in the meeting notification process. Mr. Milbrandt suggested that the mailing list should be expanded to include the Creekside Crossing area, portions of Eagle Ridge, Oak Glen and the VanTassel property. Ms. Buss asked for members' "first cut" choices for program interests for parks/trails in the project area. Mr. Russell noted there is a stream at the back of the Munkelwitz property that will be a draw for kids. Mr. Russell also stated there has been an interest expressed in a skating rink. Ms. Snellman pointed out there had been previous discussions about constructing a warming house; Mr. Russell stated there are design plans for a warming house. Mr. Russell stated there also had been talk of a soccer field and small ball field for that area. ( , .. ~ Ms. Buss asked members whether they should present concept plans at the first public meeting or just gather input. Mr. Milbrandt said he would rather not have preconceived plans. Ms. Amrein said she thought there would be certain features that the City definitely wants included, rather than relying solely on public input. Mr. Russell suggested including the area north of the railroad tracks in the plans. There was discussion of what items the Board will like included in plans. Ms. Amrein spoke in favor of some type of permanent restroom facility; Ms. Snellman agreed, noting that people often visit the area for an extended period of time. Other items included: parking; soccer field and small ball field, on the scope of the Washington Park field; play equipment; picnic benches; and water fountain. Ms. Buss asked about including a splash pad, similar to those in other neighborhood parks Bonestroo had developed plans for; Mr. Russell suggested first checking with Public Works. Ms. Amrein asked if there would be any way to promote some sense of quietness/serenity; Ms. Buss suggested .that might be accomplished through some type of signage. There also was a discussion of the policy regarding dogs as an issue the Board will have to revisit. Feb. 17 was the date selected for the first public meeting. Park section of the Public Works Annual Report Mr. Milbrandt said he asked Public Works Director Klayton Eckles to pull out the parks section of the annual report for the Board's information. Ms. Amrein had several questions related to the charts/graphs. Mr. Milbrandt said several of the questions might be related to the City's switch from having staff assigned by department to having staff cross trained, thereby resulting in differences in accounting for staff time. Other business Ms. Amrein stated she would not be able to attend the next regular Board meeting. Mr. Russell asked Ms. Amrein if she would be willing to serve as chair; Mr. Amrein said she would do that, but a vice chair would have to be appointed due to her schedule. Ms. Snellman, seconded by Mr. Milbrandt, moved to adjourn at 8:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Baker Recording Secretary / / MEMORANDUM TO: Park Board FROM: Steve Russell, Community Development Director V DATE: February 24,2005 SUBJECT: Millbrook Planned Unit Development Park, Open Space and.Trail Plan At their 2-14-05 meeting, the Planning Commission began review of plans for the development of the Palmer Property. The property is located at the comer of TH96 and CRI5. The attached map shows the; site. The site is located between Brown's Creek and South Twin Lake. The developer has provided each Park Board member plans for the development. The proposal shows a 7A-acre park along TH96. No parking is provided for the park, the intent is to provide for 2-sided on street parking for people who drive to the park. The park dedication requirement of the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan is 10% of net land area for park. In this case the net land acre is 107 acres (excluding lake, wetlands, sloped lands and right-of-ways). Based on the park dedication policy, 10.7 acres of park is required. This can be reduced by 30% if other private park improvements or open space credits are provided. (See attached park dedication policy). The development trail plan shows an extensive system of trails. The City's recently adopted trail plan is attached. In addition to the proposed trails, a trail around the south side of South Twin Lake is shown on the plan. Also some trails are shown on steeply sloped banks. The trail slope should be no greater than 6 % in graded areas. At meeting time, Park Board can talk about what should be included in the 7 A-acre park. The developer has shown a concept that can be reviewed. Recommendation Review parks/open space and trail presentation for review and comment. Attachments City trail plan, Park Dedication Policy, City Comprehensive Plan Park Policies, letter from Developer and Site Map o /~ ~ ~'\~ '1- O'~;,\ \,'\ :;; I zl l _' s' ~ ",\ , \ '\ ~~ W OU\E. .. 0'" ,s' '!\ t ;, ,\ ~, S !,,! > ! wo::' ",.';,."" \\ .,~~. 1006~'1l0 1000 Feet l ! w, II > " " . '"" "~ ~ ,~J ' ~'1 :~" , ',,:; :';?:~~: ~~~\, ~"\'- ~ ~,hlly \'\v:f :;; W OiUR LL $T, E OiURC>-1l1 ~~OSO:<(; ~\,>\, I' , .:::::Lake ... 5T ;n ~ sT 0 UBU ClUE ~~ \ \' "- W oHJER SONjE:;; f. ~\ 0 "" ~ I:!i i HANCOCl< 5T, E H.... COC< ~ ~ '" ''\ '. /" " ll' "l: .. " ~E f'lJAlIN GTON..5T~ \\\\ 0 ' ~ [lRI\,\N(l "+ (~t '" "'0 : ~ · ... .... RSH . ... / ~ "\\ ~N ~:rR (~~'" :~: 5T([( ~ ; ~5TL>0~; -'<<,z \ ~", -+- -'?/" ~ "" ~ ~CA~""5 5') "'\;\ I Wo ~""5 5@'~ ~ ... ~ ~ "'~ ... /" , ~! ~ '~"";; ~ · 1:~~::~<,?r \~, :I ~tUlOw~ i ~ -& '" ~ ~ 0'0 Cr i..>I'f'i,11' .~ :dN ~'to~' z~a I~ , III SHElTON,.p. '" 0 UF'PER:! '1. 5T Z ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ "C;T~ cw}i ~fi ; ~~'~ ;1h~N i "- ~_ J, S ii wii ~ CT Z ~, ~ _ Y/> """'0 "" 'l! ,< ~ 1- 5T, N, ~ "" ~ SOt> 001> 5TN @ '1 \, '~ ST. N .~ . SOt\ \. \', , z ,,'-;, ~ RO ~ ,/' Y , I South Twin ,\ , " Lake ,"- -_.J ::::...~ ~ -1-i'J.FJLl~ ~ ~ \ /: @f~ // // / /' (I / -,-~ \ ./ "- (J ~ p ~ ;n z ~ ~oz; ... .'iJl~ Sr ,p > RO Q. ~ ~ '. ~ ~ il ~~...... 0 >># z ........,...UOl""",. 0 ~ OAQ.I ~..v e"~" ~ '1- o ~ ~'''' ~ ... ~ I' J 1 5 !i z , '2. z , , 77TH STN @ @ 5T ~ 'IlEA 15 i~ ~ a: 'i! S! ('l) ~~Qo01>'" J ~ a: 0 ~ g "~I>NO .. l: @ N N STATE HWY, 36 Cit\' of ~~el .... 1) Engineering Department TRAIL IMPROVMENT MAP EXISTING TRAILS 2001-2003 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 2004 IMPROVEMENTS 2005-2006 FUTURE IMPROVEMENT I 2007-2009 FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SCHOOLS N ~,,'tA, r~ ~~~ W ....- :J ~"'., E -; '\ :: ~, ~~ O.ftl\.'''t 1 ~ I' CITY OF STILLWATER PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION POLICY POLICY ADOPTING STANDARDS ,AND GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING THAT PORTION OF LAND BEING PLATTED, SUBDIVIDED OR DEVELOPED wmCH IS TO BE CONVEYED OR DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR PARK, TRAIL OR RECREATION PURPOSES OR WITH RESPECT TO WInCH CASH IS TO BE CONTRIBUTED TO THE CITY IN LIEU OF SUCH CONVEYANCE OF DEDICATION. 1. AUTHORITY: The state of Minnesota has enacted Minnesota Statutes 462.358, subdivision 2(b) which gives authority to the Cities to requq-e that a reasonable portion of any proposed subdivision be dedicated to the public, or preserved for public use as parks, playgrounds, wetlands, trails or open space. The City of Stillwater has, by this dedication policy, chosen to exercise this authority in establishing minimum requirements for meeting this public need. 2. PURPOSE: The City Council recognizes that preservation of land for park, playground, wetland, trails, and public open space purposes as it relates to the use and development of land is essential to maintaining a healthful, safe and desirable environment. The City must not only provide these necessary facilities for citizens of today, but also for the future needs of the City as described in the Comprehensive Plan. It is recognized by the City Council that the demand for park, playground, to wetlands, trails and public open space within a municipality is directly related to the density and intensity of development permitted and allowed within any area. Urban development means greater 1 '" .. numbers of people and higher demands for park, playground, wetlands, trails and public open space. The Park Plan Standards of the City, an element of the Comprehensive Plan, has established , ~ minimum community criteria for meeting the needs of the residents of Stillwater. Inorder to meet the community needs for parks, playgrounds, wetlands, trails and open space, ten, (10) acres of such land is required for each 1,000 residents of which seven (7) acres shall be designated as neighborhood parks. Neighborhood parks have a service area of one-quarter mile. This shall be the standard upon which the City shall establish its park land and parks cash dedication. ..; It is the policy of Stillwater that the following guidelines for the dedication of land for park, playground and public open space purposes' (or cash contributions in lieu of dedication) in the subdividing and developing of land are appropriate. 3. RESIDENTIAL PARK LAND DEDICATION: The amount of land to be dedicated shall be based on the net developable land area of the proposed subdivision, proposed type of dwelling unit and density. The 1990 census data for households includes 2.8 persons per household. The fonnula for land dedication: The greater of 1) proposed units per acre or 2) zoned density. Dwelling Unit Density Land to be Dedicated o - 1.9 units per acre 9% 2.0 - 3.5 units per acre 10% 2 ;. t 3.6 - 5.9 units per acre 11% 6 -10 units per acre 12% 10+ units per acre Additional .5% for each Unit over 10 Commercial 7.0% of net land area 4. RESIDENTIAL TRAIL REQUIREMENTS: Residential subdivider shall provide community trail facilities acceptable. to the city or pay a fee of $225 per residential dwelling unit for trails. 5. GUIDELINES FOR ACCEPTING DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES: A. Land proposed to be dedicated for public purposes shall meet the needs of the City as described in the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan. B.Prior to dedication, the subdivider shall deliver to the City Attorney, an abstract of title or registered property abstract evidencing good and marketable title, free and clear of any mortgages, liens, encumbrances, assessments and taxes. The conveyance documents shall be in such form acceptable to the City. C. The required dedication or payment of fees-in-lieu of land dedication shall be made before fmal plat approval. D. The removal of trees, topsoil, storage of construction equipment, burying of construction debris or stockpiling of surplus soil on dedicated land is strictly forbidden without the prior written review by the Parks and Recreation Board and approval of the Community Development Director. 3 " ~ E. Grading and utility plans, which may effect or impact the proposed park dedication, shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Board prior to dedication. .' , , , " F. 'To be eligible for park dedication credit, land dedication is to be located outside of drainways, flood plains or ponding areas after the site has been developed. Grades exceeding 12 percent or that are unsuitable for park development may be considered for partial dedication. Absent unusual conditions, storm water drainage areas and holding areas or ponds shall not be considered wetlands. However, where wetlands have been determined to have a park function by the Parks and Recreation Board, credi! may be given at a rate of 25 percent of the pond or holding area and adjoining land areas below the high water level; a minimum of 70 percent of land above the high water mark or 100 year flood plain shall be dedicated before pond or holding area credit is granted. In addition, developers must also comply with City dedication policies relating to wetland dedication. Where subdividers and developers of land provide significant amenities such as, but not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, or ball fields, within the development for the benefit of those residing or working therein, and where, in the judgement of the Parks and Recreation Board, the amenities significantly reduce the demands for public recreational facilities to serve the development, the Community Development Director may recommend to the Parks and Recreation Board that the amount of land to be dedicated for park, playground and public open space (or cash contribution in lieu of dedication) be reduced by an amount not to exceed 50 percent of the amount 4 , calculated under paragraph 2 above. G. The City, upon review, may determine that the developer shall create and maintain some form of on-site recreation use by the site residents such as tot lots and open play space.1bis requirement may be in addition to the land or cash dedication requirement. 6. CASH PAYMENT IN LIEU OF DEDICATION, RESIDENTIAL: If, at the option of the City upon review and recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Board, it is determined that a cash payment in lieu ofland dedication shall be made, the cash shall be placed in a special fund for Parks and Recreation use and deposited by the developer with the City prior to final plat app~oval. The in lieu park fee shall be based on the following guidelines: Single Family Residential $725 per unit Duplexes $500 per unit Townhomes $500 per unit Multifamily $500 per unit 7. COMBINATION LAND AND CASH DEDICATION: The city may require the subdivider or developer to make a combination cash and land dedication pursuant to the following formula: A. The amount of land which could be required in accordance with Section 3 shall be calculated. 5 ~, " B. From the total calculated in subparagraph (A) above, the actual amount of land the city detennines to be needed to fulfill the purposes of this Subd. 6 shall be subtracted. . , C. The balanceamved at in subparagraph (B) above, shall be cOIlvertedintoa cash contribution in lieu of land dedication pursuant to a standard formula established by the city, which formula takes into consideration such things as, but not necessarily limited to, the fair market value of the property in the plat, subdivision or development and the percentage of the total park dedication obligation represented by the said balance. 8. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL D~DICATION REQUIREMENTS: Subdividers and developers of commerciallindustrialland, including commercial/industrial portions of Planned Developments, shall be required at the time the site plan is approved and building permits are issued to dedicate to the City for park, playground and public open space purposes, 7.0 percent of the net land area within the development as detennined by the City according to the guidelines set forth in Section 3 of this policy. 9. CASH PAYMENT IN LIEU OF DEDICATION, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL: In those cases where the City does not require park or open space within a development, the City shall require payment of fees in lieu of land dedication in an amount equal to the net land area required in Section 3 above. Cash shall be contributed at the time of approval of each final plat or at the time of site plan or building permit approval as determined by the City. A credit of up to 25 percent of the required dedication may be allowed by the City Council ' 6 ,. for on-site storm sewer, water, ponding and settling basins provided that such improvements benefit identifiable park and recreation water resources as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Board.. The City Council, upon review and recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Board, may review and determine by resolution an adjustment to the fee based upon the City's estimate of the average value of undeveloped land in the City. 10. REQUIRED PLAN AND IMPROVEMENTS TO PARKS: , - The developer or subdivider shall be responsible for preparing a concept park plan or trail plan based on the Parks, Open Space and Trails Plan as identified in the Comprehensive Plan as approved by the Parks Board, and fgr making certain improvements to their developments - for parks, playgrounds and public open space purposes as follows: A. Provide finished grading, appropriate ground cover or sodding for playground, paved trails and perimeter landscaping. B. Establish park boundary comers for the purpose of erecting park limit signs. The developer shall contact the appropriate Parks and Recreation Department personnel for the purpose of identifying park property comers. C. Provide sufficient improved public road access of no less than 300 feet for neighborhood parks and additional frontage for community parks. 7 ... 4Jmj? P/Pfr1 P4-/ZM /tlf'~11 I(II(u/i7wiJPtJ/J"-t- ! Objectives, Policies and Programs Policy 8: The city shall consider the needs of ~he. elderly: a.nd ,J handicapped when planning new or redeslgnmg eXlstmg Parks Standards parks. Program (1) As a part of the neighborhood planning process inventory residential park needs and accommodate neighborhood park locations.. Objectives: Bring the amount of Stillwat,~r's p~rk land into . compiiance with the city's adopted minimum Program (2) The city shap study and pursue vanous means - . of funding the acquisition, operation and maintenance of standards (commumty park land at 3 acres per k t a,'f and "'ec"'eat,'on ~acilities. I. d' hb d kid pa~ open space ~, "" ,. 1,000 popu atlon an nel~ orhoo par an a~ ' 7 acres per 1,000 populatIon). - ASIC GUIDELINES FOlfc6MMu:NI't <~ ~!:..*..",k;y~;:.~> ,~....,\,~ ~ DEVELO y:,:': ':, Provide a balance of recreation opportunities, ,,;,!,F;;,(,:~.;/" including facilities to serve the varied interest of the population. Policy 5: The city will provide recreation activity sites to respond to the needs of a diverse population. These needs include ravine systems, trailways for pedestrians, joggers and bicyclists and non-traditional types of recreation such as habitat restoration projects, community gardens and oflerblading. Program (3) Complete the River Front Park Master Plan which includes the Aiple Property and Ko/liner Park. r()Oesignate adequate park sites for the future \:0/ development of the city. Upgrade existing parks. Provide for an annual evaluation, maintenance and replacement of recreational facilities. Policy 1: The city shall require all new development to dedicate land or pay Ei park fee according to the park dedication policy. r- Policy 2: The city shall obtain end develop new public parlrs I at a rate consistent with new residential development. Policy 3: The city shall develop community parks consistent with growth of the city's population. Policy 4: As a standard the city shall strive to provide park facilities within one-quarter mile or less of residents living within the residential areas of Stillwater without intrusion of major physical barriers. J ....... Policy 6: The development of private sector recreation facilities in the appropriate locations shall be encouraged. Program (4) Locate a community park facility in the Business Park area. Policy 7: Joint local government development of community _ ' 'recreation facilities shall be encouraged. Program (5) Acquire and develop land west of Long Lake i~ the URTPA area for community park purposes. Insure publiC assess and views of the lake and provide pedestrian paths along the Long Lake and Brown's Creek. 8-2 Program (6) Coordinate city park development with school planning to support joint use of facilities. , Efficient Use of Facilities Objectives: Maximize opportunities for the joint use of public . , land and faciliti~s such as schools,.detention ponds and, area under the jurisdiction of other public agencies that have land available for possible recreation purposes. Maximize the extended use of existing public facilities for year-round and evening use. Policy 9: The city shall work with the school districts in identifying and evaluating the potential for park acquisition of school sites which might become surplus school lands. Because of the open space already associated with school sites, they are ideal sources ...of additional park land. A priority for the reuse of surplus school sites and existing athletic fields should be for park or recreation purposes. Program (7) Consider cooperative efforts with the school district, public utilities and the city in order to develop parks, retain open space areas and recreation facilities and provide programs. The city will benefit by identifying recreation areas that are owned by school district or other public entities and seek permission to use those lands for recreation programs or facilities. Program (8) Develop a list of available public park facilities. Periodical1y update and distribute this list to community groups. Program (9) Work with the school district to establish the joint use of land for park purposes at Washington School. Program (10) Develop and implement a program for year- around use of some recreation facilities. Program (11) Explore methods to implement the URTPA park and trail system with Stillwater Township and Park Location and Design Objectives: . , ". Locate new neighborhood parks in areas not necessarily adjacent to schools in order to better distribute urban open space and to enhance neighborhood identity. This is especially applicable in the South Hill and Oak Glen planning areas: . . .' - - Design park and recreation facilities to serve the recreation and social needs of residents of all ages, economic situations and physical abilities. Design parks to enhance .neighborhood identity and character as well as to serve recreation functions. Policy 10: Residential developments adjacent to parks or open spaces should be encouraged to provide direct access to and common open space contiguous with such areas. Policy 11: In considering the location and redevelopment of parks, the city shall select sites based on maximum ' accessibility, proper topography and visibility (for the safety of park users). Policy 12: The city shall promote private open space an recreation facilities in large-scale residential developments in order to meet a portion of the open space and recreation needs that wi11 be generated by the development. Policy 13: In the design and maintenance of parks, consideration should be given to impacts on wildlife. In particular, it should be recognized that native plant species may be best suited for providing wildlife cover and food sources and that herbicides, pesticides and fungicides may be damaging to native plants and wildlife. Program (12) Establish a volunteer program to help maintain and enhance neighborhood parks. Add landscaping, sculptures and seating. Va/y the landscaping, improvements and construction materials used in different parks to help establish park and neighborhood identity. Program (13) Use the development planning review proces~ to provide private open space and recreation facilities. -' Program (14) Use subdivision regulations and the development review process to locate parks in central secure portions of subdivisions and to promote the safety of park users in the design of parks. 8-3 ; <'-,~". ., ~.",."" Program (15) Establish a regular patrol of parks to provide for the safety of park users. Program (16) Create a park logo and a consistent design for park signs and furniture. Program (17) Develop neighborhood park plans based on , the following priority list developed by the Park and Recreation Board. These plans will reflect the neighborhood input into the planning process. Park Improvement Priorities Neighborho,od Parks Staples Field Schulenburg Park Sunrise Park Pioneer Park Triangle Park . . Meadowlark Park Washington Park Ramsey/Grove Park Northland Park Community Parks Lily Lake Northland Park Program (18) Develop the plans and specifications for Loweff Park improvement as part of the implementation of the Lowell Park Plan. Program (19) Implement the Lily Lake Master Plan. Program (20) Schedule and budget park improvements through the Capital Improvement Program. Trails and Pathways The city is working with the metropolitan council, Washington County and private developers to establish a trail system in and adjacent to the City of Stillwater. The network will be part of the open space system connecting residential areas, neighboring communities such as Oak Park Heights, Bayport and Stillwater Township, and provide access to the state trial system. The trails map shows proposed trailway locations. Objectives: Designate an extensive network of trails and pathway corridors. Preserve and provide visual access through trail location quality to landscapes. Provide alternative means to reach city parks, county parks, regional parks, state parks and other community destinations 8-4 Preserve the natural environment of the Aiple propertIes and Kolliner Park while providing Policy 20; Enc~urage the incofP,oration .~f trails and recreational opportunities as a part of the city's pathways mto corndors used for public and utility purposes. ,. . rf t k t rive ron par sys em. R"\. Program. (21) . Implement the trails and pathways corridors --~-- \j' plan. -t~G~J'/~" ~~tL ;~:Vi::iS~~~iC:~w:~t;:~:~n~~ ~~:S w~~ .--- vr~'Cor"']a . '~~ oul'W Kolliner Park. This is an important connection in the park system and should be saved. " Preserve and enhance public-owned ravines. Maximize the city's recreation opportunities. Policy 14: Bikeways, hiking trails, equestrian trials, rest/ areas and picnicking accommodations should be provided within designated trail corridors, wherever feasible. Policy15: The city should control land development along designated trails and pathway corridors in order to provide sufficient right of way and to ensure that adjacent new development does not detract from the scenic and aesthetic qualities of the corridor. Policy 16: When new development occurs adjacent to a designated trail and pathway corridor, the city should require the development to install and maintain the trails. o ICY 17: The design, construction and management of trails and pathways should be carefully planned and executed in order to minimize environmental disturbance. Policy 18: Public improvements within designated trails and pathways corridors should be designed to provide safe and secure routes for trials, including grade separation betweeri roadways and trials whenever feasible. Policy 19: The city should promote cooperative interagency ,planning of pathways, bikeways and equestrian trails. ''--' }dellrieatlon~of.the refallon$RfR~'!'r.-~'+'''''&:!~ ,j>. ,;;;/.:i;-. .., '.'-0,"}':'1;,*~,q"~~i/ " - ,~<,-, ",'.; ,.-. .~;-:: l:~"~"',_,-{ J,t .~j.y ",,' . '~;the':'~coul1h', ubI . ",; V~~e \ ty,....... "'fi",,..,.,.,':l' p..,. ,<""," " V~lo';;~rs'~who:a(e :b";the ;<l};%~<i_,~-_:,R~tT~~'~~;$;,~--";;tk'''--''~-\:-~:_'';~ rrrdors'netWor . .\~ .H":""-;"< "'._:;_<"'N4>._>i_"."'; 'W;"""V_~_ ,-~ -. -' ...+',.. '.' Stillwater Riverfront In ,1992, Stillwater prepared a master plan for the : ,renovation of Lowell Pai'k. This plan also included a preliminary study of other city owned riverfront __properties including Kolliner Park and the Aiple properties. Objectives: Develop a park system along Stillwater's riverfront for the enjoyment of Stillwater residents and visitors. Preserve, enhance and restore Lowell Park based on its setting, recreational uses and historic integrity as contained in the adopted Lowell Park Plan. Policy 21: The city should develop a trail system to connect the Aiple property to downtown Stillwater and Kol/iner Park. Policy 22: The land north of downtown along the St. Croix River should be acquired for park purposes. Policy 23: The city-owned Aiple property and Kol/iner Park shall be preselVed for park and river open space purposes. Program (22) Prepare detailed park plans for the riverfront properties based on the concept plans developed as part of the Lowell Park Plan before they become available for use (1992). Program( 23) Renovate and expand Lowell Park (in phases as financing is available) according to the Lowell Park Plan. 8-5 2/23/05 TO: Stillwater Parks Board cc: Steve Russell From: Jay Liberacki US Home ..>('y ^' --- Re: Millbrook (Palmer) Community Plan US Home is pleased to present our plan for the Palmer Property (Phase III Aruiexation) to the Parks Board and look forward to making a presentation at your February 28th Parks Board meeting. Enclosed is our submission booklet, full size drawing are available from the Planning Department. I have also included some past correspondence between US Home and the City that include discussions of our park concept. We have been working with the city staff for more than a year on various land use and parks and open space concepts. Various plans have been presented to the Stillwater Planning Commission, the two Watershed Districts and ajoint meeting of the Stillwater Township Board and Planning Commission. We have worked to incorporate or address the ideas that these groups have brought to our attention. We're now seeking your input. Parks and Open Space are a very important part of any City annexation and the development of a contemporary new community. The location of the Palmer property in proximity to Brown's Creek and South Twin Lakes makes these issues doubly important. Over this last year of study with the city staff, the three development uses shown on the Development Plan have moved little from where they are currently shown. They are each sited to take best advantage of the property's natural site characteristics, from the standpoint of their respective architectural and resident profile requirements. Rather than discussions of moving the development uses, the discussions have focused on the details of the architecture, drives and driveways, pedestrian circulation, streetscapes, landscapes, etc. ... There has been much more discussion in terms of location is the Park element and its relationship to the three development uses and Browns Creek and South Twin Lakes. The park has been studied as a lake shore park, a central park to all three uses, a park that favored the attached Single Family and most recently the current plan, that: o Creates a public park/open space welcoming residents and visitors entering Stillwater on Highway 96 from the west o Creates the fIrst of several park/open space elements that residents and visitors hopefully will pass on their drive into Stillwater o Creates a large park/open space that is highly visible to all residents of Stillwater as they use Highway 96 in their day to day activities o Creates a large park/open space that acts as a soft tran_sition from urban Stillwater to rural Stillwater'Township . o Creates a large park/open space that is the terminus of the Browns Creek trail system within Stillwater o Creates a large park/open space that could accommodate athletic fIelds and the traffIc from outside the community that these types of Park uses generate, without disrupting or negatively impacting the neighborhood residents. o Creates a large park/open space as the front yard for many of the home~ that don't front on either Browns Creek of South Twin Lakes .. Our current plan evolved from the fact that neither the development team nor the city staff could get really excited about the prior plans. The current plan could be considered unorthodox because it places the park on a perimeter street. (All of the positive aspects noted above would be lost with an internal park). The property has so many natural amenities, internal homes sites are not diminished by moving the park to a perimeter street, in fact many of the homes will be much more livable and desirable with the current plan. (And that should be our goal as community developers and city offIcials, to create highly desirable neighborhoods). I believe the proposed park will be one of the largest parks in Stillwater's park system short of the several athletic complexes. I have included an overlay that shows the approximate confIguration of the existing City Parks at the same scale as the Parks and Open Space exhibit in your booklet. The sizes were fIeld measured by me with a measuring wheel, so they are only approximate, but should be close to their actual size. The park uses shown are only for illustrative purposes. I understand the parks department or Parks Board would make the decision as to which facilities would be placed in Millbrook Park. (I like to use a ball fIeld in my illustrations because residents and neighbors can usually visualize a football or baseball fIeld. Also it gives the Park's Board a lot of flexibility by showing that if they want, the park can accommodate a large flat athletic fIeld). We are very excited about the community we have created and look forward to meeting you and presenting our Parks and Open Space plan to you and seeking your ideas on improving it even further. .. . S.':"A"'~ 1111I1111 P. 5/6 I I 11.11 :-Jdn. 1,0.1996- 1 : 32Pr-1!CCOMBS FRANK ROSS ~. . -.---.. ...._"-, " '3a:J '~ C? ,"", ~\ "" .., \ \ 3':~" I ~. . _ \. ,~.::. - I I -- ~ ' - - j" .... ~ . . - .;:::'-- -;:) I I I I :r~'j 1 . . i : " \..1" -. I<<~ ~~4- TH #96 ellwood Road) ~:~ <' f. ::: ...:~..:-,,:::a I ~:r;I..ITf! -:'':j .~~~ T ..... .~ .:. . \ 2"~':. PHASE III - ... ... ...., '4 'Y.. 2:':'} 2 Zi(.:. ~ I I I I~~ \ ..2""J -: - \ ':a.....':. -:'...~ -,-' r'Wf ~,:...., I "1) I i '. ~Q _._ l CI I...r all! ..: t.A _ )1:,1. ~lA') . Road #64 (McKusfck) . z.. . 1 \ ..." . I I L_.J It: V.."t , ... -... . CU < :., . \ . ! ....... . j 1 -;'." , ..:". == .... = = .= ~ .... l i i 80th Street I \. .'J "h~ 2~~:'- . ,.Y. ~ .' OtITl.DT ! D ~ l1c::Collb~ Fnnk Roos fl~$ochtes. Inc. 15050 23rd Rve. H. Plyaouth. "M. 5Sq~( 612.10476-6010 F~x 61c/476-eS32 Engineers Planners: Surve)'ors , CITY &. TOWNSHIP OF STILLWRTER ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT . I' ~/jlt"^. j c4>~ w z c:::t:. · ::J 1317 : 3~2 ~-H~13'-- - -- U") w____________, 31 OJ :r: 3Q 7 ~----,----- -- :c en ------- 302 J <( 303 en 1.0 ~ . Q') .....--r 001 -: 81Q 815 618 --.--r .....--r ..--.. 804 J t 4 . ~518 . c:::t:' w ~ z w () :c ~ c:::t: o Z · 504 · J · .. ----500- ~ J 424 -.-J- ~ .- - - -~420-:-- · 416 · 4t2 J 408 . ! __._._mm_...___----,--.. 1016 484 I~-:--cxf> f N J C\I ~j~.. J;: ~Ii t-;: -40~ , ~ STREET 10 . ~ ~J J ~ 318 1;: 1 ;: 308 . --- 304) 9 f-" W I w- ~ ~ (j) L__ (j) Z W ~ .0 :c ~ ~ ,0 Z l R1IW R20W R19W n!N nnl 'T31N nON T29N T28~ R21W R21W R20W Vicinity Map , ""L "~~;~'?r--~ ~ o 133 Scale in Feet This (YswinQ" l/)ereSlJJtctacompillilorl :~;:~~:~ ~~::;oO~~()~I~C~ ~~:i~~5hJ~~:'e.,,<;: g~'~~ respOn5lb16l;;1renymacWr8Cl9S Solre"W'sHn!jonCountyS\.I'V~sOffice Pt1Ol1&I~51J431HIS15 F'<!rC9loala~QdonAS400l'l!orm-al:i()(l CUlTenlltlrougr..DeCElmbo9r31,2005 MaPPf1nl~ FebnJa!)'23.2005 MEMORANDUM TO: Park Board FROM: Steve Russell, Community Development Director tv- DATE: February 24,2005 SUBJECT: Park Budget Funds, 2005 The budget for 2005 includes $70,000 for all capital park improvements. In addition $60,000 has been set aside for a skateboard park. . The County is reviewing the City's $75,881 grant request for Stonebridge playgrounds. According to the CDBG awards schedule, a decision should be made on 2005 projects February/March 2005. MEMORANDUM To: Park and Recreation Commission From: Sue Fitzgerald, Planner Date: February 28, 2005 Subject: Neighborhood Park Design Meetings Settlers Glen Park Meeting - February 10, 2005 Schulenburg Park Meeting - February 16,2005 Meetings were held with neighborhood residences to Teview conceptual park plans and make comments. The announcement was sent to the entire Dutchtown area this time instead of those in the 350 foot radius of the park. Schulenburg Park Meeting About ten (10) people, and Linda Amrein attended the meeting. The general consensus of those who attended the meeting was that the park should be about the same as it was before it was used for the staging area of the North Hill water and sewer project. They were all in agreement that the park activities be relatively low impact with low noise levels. They want another meeting in April so Tim and I can show them exactly the equipment that will go into the park. 1. Little League ball field 2. More trees 3. Benches 4. Pick up after your dogs sign 5. Small play structure 6. Boulders 7. Sledding 8. Ice skating 9. Keep Schulenburg Park sign 10. Landscaping around the sign 11. Historic interpretation 12. Grass - no paths Settlers Glen Park Meeting Again, those who attended the meeting (10) wanted a low key, quiet park. They seemed to approve the conceptual plan they were shown. The plan was drawn as per their suggestions included the following: 1. No pathways 2.' The play equipment should be for the 1 to 10 year old group 3. Benches 4. A gazebo 5. Pick up after your dogs sign 6. No softball 7. Bocce ball court 8. Ice skating 9. Boulders Originally, they suggested the park be named Prairie Park, now a suggestion has been made that the park be named Isaac's Park, after a little boy that one of the residents had a miscarriage with. Staff suggested they could have a bench put in the park dedicated to him. Staff suggests the Parks Board consider establishing guidelines.foe park naming. Neighborhood Meeting on Munklewitz Property Public Comments February 17, 2005 Remember that Neal is a busy collector street-need to find a safe way to cross. Timeline? Need to complete plan and cost estimate for the City by July to get into the budget process for 2006. Tie the park to the natural areas to the west and north. This setting is unique and special. . Types of facilities, colors, etc., should harmonize with the natural setting There are formal ballfields and soccer fields at the public works area. All that is needed at this park is open play area and maybe informal softball field. General agreement on the following facilties: . Play equipment (fit with natural setting) . Shelter . Picnic areas . Natural plantings . Open play space/grass area . Informal/pick-up type baseball . Skating rink & warming house . Restrooms . Water fountain Trail connections are desired to other parks in the area. Have lots of available trails. May need to prioritize the trails to fit the City budget. Need to complete connections to the south-some areas the trails go through wetlands. Lots of kids, especially small kids, in the Creekside neighborhood. Lack of sidewalk or trail on Neal Avenue is a problem. City Engineer indicated that the street will be improved at some point to include curb and gutter, and this will allow space for a trail/sidewalk on one side. Part of the road is still in the Township, so this will be a future improvement. Need to think about accessories on the trail like trash cans, benches, etc. There will be a trail on Boutwell Ave. as it is improved during the next few years. Skating rink got lots of support. Could it look natural? Should be for casual skating, not hockey. Facilities in the park should be adaptable, not highly specialized. Extend ski trails to the park. Think about making snow? Some interest in a splash pad. Restrooms a good idea, but should be screened or invisible. The warming house could be part of the picnic shelter and restroom facilities. Could provide interpretive information at this structure as well. Maybe the playground could go back on the "L". Should be away from Neal Avenue, and this would help to preserve natural appearance of the park. Need to consider two entries: one from the parking lot to the north, and the other on the south side of the tracks, for those who will walk in from the neighborhood. Need to consider safety for the RR crossing. Need to consider ways to slow traffic on Neal Avenue to the north of the park. Need some screening from Neal . Low berms (maintain visual access into the park for police and maintenance staft) . Landscaping . Pence Include some interpretation of Brown's Creek and surrounding habitat and natural areas. These are special features of the location, Interpretation shouldn't take over the park, but should be integrated, especially where the neighborhood:park meets the Brown's Creek park and natural area. Provide a trail map and info for trail users for the general area. Consider the potential for "festive" events. Need to control dogs in the park-consider signs or other controls. Consider special state or local flowers Consider interpretation or restoration of the wetlands around Brown's Creek Pine plantation-consider opening this to improve views to natural area. Should be able to walk through the openings. Maybe include picnic tables to take advantage of the views. The park is a gem. The natural setting makes it really unique. This should be a high consideration in the plan. The Zephyr RR line may become a potential trail corridor to downtown in the future. Consider this in planning. Suggest no boulders in the park as they can be dangerous.