HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-10-05 CC Packet
i
I ~
'.1 W\VJ~
REGULAR MEETING,
~. , "
RlECESSED MEETING
. CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. ;04-24
Council Chambers, 216 North Fo~rth Street
October 5, 2004 'I
II
i
I
i
,
11"
~
II
rtA~
JUV'-
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
,
I
4:30 Fr .M.
7:00 ~.M.
~
I
C~LL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Ii
ii
OTHER BUSINESS!,'
II . II I
1. 2005 Street Improvement Projec( ,., ! !
2. Possible approval of resolution declaring an emergency" authorizing emergency management
and hazard mitigation activities w, ith regard to the exterior wall at TefritJrial Prison site
I I I '
~
I.
j
'i
I
I,
i
STAFF REPORTS
1., Police Chief
2.1 Fire Chief
3. City Clerk
4. Director of Admin.
5. Community Dev. Djrecto~
6. City Engine~r/PWD
i
!
r. City .f\ttorne~
8. Finance Director
I" !I II
? City ?\dministrator
~ ~
I
)1
~
CALL TO ORDER
II L ;'
ROLL CAL ! "
! ",:. i.
", , , ' i:
_rPROV ~L OF ~INUT.ES - Approval of September 21, 2004 regular meeting minqtes 'and Septenrber 22,
004 special meeting minutes, : I I "
! ' .
II " :!
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS II
Ii ' " ' .
~' I
O'PEN FORUM " ""
tt The Open Forum is a portion of the Co~ncil meeting to address Oouncil on subjeqts whic~ are no! a part of
:1 the meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the ,time of the dtatJment or may gi~e direction
! to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. ," ~l I
I ." .
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CONSENT AGENDA*, , I
1. Resolution 2004-198, directing payment of bills ,,: I
2. Resolution 2004-199, approval ot:agreement for snow remqval services QOq4-2005
3. Approval to purchase and have installed a new play structure for Lily Lak~ Park
4. Approval of utility bill adjustments - sewer charges !
5. Approval of transfer of Special Assessment Balances for 1616 West Olive
1
6. Approval of Capital Outlay for City Hall Roof Upgr~des : I
PUBLIC HEARINGS i '
1. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider an assessmerit for grading of city :lot. Notice
of hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 17, 200t aqd nbtic~ mailedllto affected
property owner. (Resolution), ", 1'1 : I
2. This is the date and time for the plJblic hearing to consider a~sessments ~or the Nort~ Hill Improvement
Project. Notice ofthe hearing was' published in the Stillwater Gazette on "SeRtember;17, 2004 and
, J~. '. notic~s mailed to affected property owners. (Resolution).' I ' : ·
~ 3. Thi,s i~ the day and time for the public hearing to consider adoption of the Bo~twell Sputh Ar,a Plan.
The Boutwell South Area Plan is bounded by Boutwell Avenl?e, County Roaq 15 (Manning Arenue) and
County Road 12. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and piliblished in the Stillv"ater
Gazette on September 24, 2004. ' . I It I
, I
i
4. Case No. V/04-80. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider a request trom Jennifer
and Tom Grahek for a variance to the lot size regulations (7,500 square feet required, 6,732 square
feet requested) for the construction of a residence with an attached garage located at 927 6th Avenue
South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were mailed to affected property owners anca..,..>
published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 24, 2004.""
5. Case No. PUD-FN/04-84. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider a request from
Terra Springs, LLC, for a Final PUD approval and a variance to height (54 feet requested, 50 feet
allowed) for Building NO.5 of Terra Springs Development containing 36 residential units located at 650
North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Notices were mailed to affected property
owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 24,2004. (Resolution)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Possible s Possible second reading of Ordinance No. 948, Zoning Map Amendment changing the
zoning of a 1.5 acres parcel located at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue from Agricultural Preservation (AP) to
Lakeshore Residential (LR). (First reading 9/21/04) (available Tuesday)
2. Possible approval of resolution adopting findings of fact relating to the approval of an ordinance relating
to the Zoning Map Amendment changing the zoning of a 1.5 acres parcel located at 7160 Mid Oaks
Avenue from Agricultural Preservation (AP) to Lakeshore Residential (LR) (available Tuesday)
NEW BUSINESS
1. Possible approval of new Tobacco License - Liberty Village Wine & Spirits
2. Park Board recommendation regarding future possible use of Kolliner Park
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
.
*
All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or
citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
separately.
.-
2
.
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 04-24
Council Chambers, 216 North Fourth Street
October 5, 2004
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OTHER BUSINESS
STAFF REPORTS
1.Police Chief
2. Fire Chief
3. City Clerk
4. Director of Admin.
5. Community Dev. Director
6. City Engineer/PWD
7. City Attorney
8. Finance Director
9. City Administrator
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approval of September 21,
2004 special meeting minutes
meeting minutes and September 22,
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & CO
.PEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Counci
the meeting agenda. The Council may take
to staff regarding investigation of the cc~'
ddress Council on subjects which are not a part of
ply at the time of the statement or may give direction
sed.
CONSENT AGENDA*
1. Resolution 2004-198, directing p
2. Resolution 2004-199, app
3. Approval to purchase and h
4. Approval of utility bill adjustm
bills
reement for snow removal services 2004-2005
d a new play structure for Lily Lake Park
sewer charges
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider an assessment for grading of city lot. Notice
of hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 17, 2004 and notice mailed to affected
property owner. (Resolution)
2. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider assessments for the North Hill Improvement
Project. Notice of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 17,2004 and
notices mailed to affected property owners. (Resolution)
3. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider adoption of the Boutwell South Area Plan.
The Boutwell South Area Plan is bounded by Boutwell Avenue, County Road 15 (Manning Avenue) and
County Road 12. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater
Gazette on September 24, 2004.
4. Case No. V104-80. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider a request from Jennifer
and Tom Grahek for a variance to the lot size regulations (7,500 square feet required, 6,732 square
. feet requested) for the construction of a residence with an attached garage located at 927 6th Avenue
South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and
published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 24, 2004.
5. Case No. PUD-FN/04-84. This is the date and time for the public hearing to consider a request from
Terra Springs, LLC, for a Final PUD approval and a variance to height (54 feet requested, 50 feet
allowed) for Building No.5 of Terra Springs Development containing 36 residential units located at 650
North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Notices were mailed to affected property .
owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on September 24,2004. (Resolution)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Possible s Possible second reading of Ordinance No. 948, Zoning Map Amendment changing the
zoning of a 1.5 acres parcel located at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue from Agricultural Preservation (AP) to
Lakeshore Residential (LR). (First reading 9/21/04) (available Tuesday)
2. Possible approval of resolution adopting findings of fact relating to the approval of an ordinance relating
to the Zoning Map Amendment changing the zoning of a 1.5 acres parcel located at 7160 Mid Oaks
Avenue from Agricultural Preservation (AP) to Lakeshore Residential (LR) (available Tuesday)
NEW BUSINESS
1. Possible approval of new Tobacco License - Liberty Village Wine & Spirits
2. Park Board recommendation regarding future possible use of Kolliner Park
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
*
All items listed under the consent agenda are
enacted by one motion. There will be no se
citizen so requests, in which event, the ite
separately.
to be routine by the City Council and will be .
ion on these items unless a Council Member or
oved from the consent agenda and considered
.
2
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor And City Council
FROM:
Shawn Sanders, Assistant City Engineer
DATE:
September 30, 2004
SUBJECT: 2005 Street Project
DISCUSSION:
At the direction of the Council, regarding the authorization for a feasibility report for the
2005 Street Improvement Project, I have included a map for the streets that were recently
rated in our Pavement management Program. This map updates the original report that
was conducted in 2001. In selecting streets for next years project, streets that were
identified had a rating of poor or worst.
Also, it was asked that more streets be added to the feasibility study area, which is not a
problem. The streets of Orwell Court and Olive Street from Greeley to Holcombe Street
will now be included in the study. One item of note, for the 2003 Street Project we
reconstructed approximately 7200 feet of city streets at a total cost of $1.2M. For 2005,
prior to the addition of Orwell Court and Olive Street, the length of the project proposed
was 8400 feet with $1.1 M budgeted for the improvement. Construction wise the two
project are similar in nature and although it is tough to say now what the actual
construction costs will be, we may be at or near the $1.1M budgeted for the project
without the added streets.
.
C'l
.JZ
OAK HILL ~ ~
CT~, ~ <( o,,~
________ ,... ~ e e k
Owns - cr
~~.
qj
let
OLIVE
>-' w
~ OAK
w
w '
rJ) rJ)
1,1
-, - - ~
t ro~ 'R<: I
a::
t!'
g
.J
llJ
<i.
~
POPLAR
STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB
~D~
~ ~I rJ)
~ SYCAMO lE
[iJ ST I CROIX 1 AVE
i( I ~
t3 STILLW '" ATER
~0
~'"
00
o
i'Ii
::;;
W, WIL KINS
en ~ iiz
~ W. ;: ELM
~
o
w. HIC::OR)
>-'
MAPLE UJ ST.
wUJ
'"
(9
t-'
UJ
RO,
~ W.OI>!< ST,
>-' t-'
rJ) rJ)
PINE
,..:
!tj
ST.
~
11M(/. "~
I
;;
'"
W
uj
ORLEANS
$/ /;;;P
City of
~. ','. 'wa1
~ -~-~
Engineering Depc
,..:
UJ
2005 STRE
FEASIBiliTY
-g ;i
N
Deerpath (Olive-Myr
Deerpath Ct (Deerpc
Owens St (Willard-C
Ramsey St (Owens-
Olive St (Owens-6th
Oak St (Owens-Gret
Willard St (Owens-C:
Fifth St S (Orleans-C
Hancock St (Holcorr
Marsh St (6th-3rd)
Orwell Ct
E.
N
l,.r?nd
o UPPER I
~@
~~~I
~ - v&r
~
~ z
~~
~
ui
::
~ tl ,,'b.~~-: - - '6) ~
_" 0 (( City of · '.
:.< ":;k ~,~'Z JV! ($" .lw~.'er'
"",w,,,,.e,"","'e'''R - "AB.'I..I"MR~HT'"S T o? \ ( .~. ~
o""..~ 'DRlGHTS \ ( l Engmeermg Department ~
.
z
RD,
N,
~
z
~i
-t'
'RCR
c,
II
Ir
_ PAVEMENT RATINGS
P -!-JJJ 2004
!. \\\ N EXCELLENT
,15 N GOOD-EX
r\,j GOOD
N
N
N
~l
\ 0.25 ~ 0
FAIR
_~th
I \=.
~ ui
>
c-?;- / <(
-v '
77TH ST N : <a ~
@ z I
I :E
POOR
WORST
0.25 Miles
~RI.EANS
o
oR.
FAIRVJEW
CEMETERY
z
~=-
<(
~
t
SHELTON ~'""H~ ~
~ I ~ I-Iw '5 VICTORIA
~~~~~~
~
;:
""z
O~~
CT. Z
w
0:
o
R~,
8 UPPER
~(
.........1 '
N,
,..~
--
~
:j
'~.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY,
AUTHORIZING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND HAZARD MITIGATION
ACTIVITIES WITH REGARD TO THE EXTERIOR WALL AT TERRITORIAL
PRISON SITE
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Contract for Redevelopment, the level ground
at the bottom of the Territorial Prison Wall was transferred to Terra Springs, LLC
as Redeveloper, and pursuant to that Contract two buildings are nearly complete
and ready for occupancy and a third building is approximately half finished; and
WHEREAS, the City is the owner of the rock wall that surrounds the
development property together with an area of approximately 10 feet adjacent to
the base of the wall on the level property upon which eventually five buildings
will be constructed; and
.
WHEREAS, according to the report of Klayton Eckles, the Prison Wall is
suffering from a number of deficiencies, including roots, missing cap stones,
missing wall stones, deteriorated bottom stone and deteriorated joints; and
WHEREAS, this condition requires immediate action since, if the repairs
are not done immediately, the wall is in danger of collapse in view of the close
proximity of the buildings to the wall, and an extreme danger exists to the
property and the persons; and
WHEREAS, if repair to the wall is delayed until after the redevelopment
project is complete, access to the wall will become severely limited and the cost
of rehabilitation will increase substantially more people and property will be in
danger; and
WHEREAS, throughout the wall, approximately 1,325 sq. ft. of stone is
missing, and approximately 400 sq. ft. of this stone is at the bottom edge of the
wall; and
.
WHEREAS, repair of the bottom edge of stone is important, since many
of the limestone blocks at the base of the wall are continually saturated with
~
\
water, causing extreme weakening in the rock from, not only water, but the water
freezing and thawing; and
.
WHEREAS, as the bottom of the stone sloughs away, serious wall failure
becomes a risk and repair of the bottom stone must be accomplished by shoring
up the wall, removing the rotted sections, placing a weep hole or pipe to the back
of the wall and, if this is not done almost immediately, the structures at the base of
the wall and the inhabitants thereof will be in extreme risk of harm and the extent
of the repairs to the wall was largely unforeseen, since prior studies did not reveal
the state of deterioration of especially the bottom portion of the wall; and
WHEREAS, the budget set aside for wall repair by the developer is
wholly inadequate to accomplish repair of the wall; and
WHEREAS, it was contemplated that the Developer would perform wall
repairs, however, prior studies did not reveal the true condition of the wall and the
extent to which the wall had rotted; and
WHEREAS, traditional sources of relief and assistance within the wall
area are not sufficient to prevent the possibility of catastrophic loss to property
and the possible injury to people in that if public bidding processes are followed,
repair might be extended at least sixty days from today's date and by that time,
weather will not permit the efficient mixing and setting of concrete needed to
accomplish the wall repair; and
.
WHEREAS, a proposal including the costs of unit work has been
submitted by Jay Brothers Construction and they appear ready and willing to
begin this work almost immediately.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
1. That with regard to the Territorial Prison Wall an emergency exists in that the
structure of the prison wall presents a clear and present danger to life and property
within the meaning of Chapter 12 of the Minnesota Statutes.
2.
That in view of this emergency, the City is authorized to enter into a contract with
Jay Brothers, Inc. for the immediate emergency repair of the wall. This action
permitted by Minn. Stat. S 12.37.
.
~
I
.
.
.
3.
That the City Administrator, together with the City Engineer are authorized to
sign appropriate instruments of contract with Jay Brothers, Inc. as recommended
and drafted by the City Attorney to effectuate the immediate emergency repair set
forth in this resolution.
Enacted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this
October, 2004.
CITY OF STILLWATER
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
day of
,,.
/:.;./
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 04-22
September 21, 2004
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Mayor Kimble called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
None
Others Present: City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Public Works Director Eckles
Finance Director Harrison
Community Development Director Russell
City Clerk Ward
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Council member Rheinberger seconded by Council member Junker to approve the
September 7, 2004 regular and recessed minutes and September 15, 2004 special meeting
minutes with the correction of "Broch" to "Kroc" in the September 7, 2004 minutes. All in favor.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
None
OPEN FORUM
None
STAFF REPORTS
Public Works Director Eckles stated that the contractor for the Main Street parking
improvement has requested a time extension on the completion of the project. He
stated that the contractor has requested this extension due to the lateness of the
construction season and the associated season-end crunch. He stated that the
contractor would begin the work in mid-April 2005 and have the project completed
before Memorial Day weekend.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Council member Junker adopting
Resolution 2004-194, approving the time extension request by Tower Asphalt for the Main
Street parking improvement.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
City Administrator Hansen reminded Council of the meeting with Oak Park Heights and
Mn/DOT on Wednesday, September 22,2004 at 6:00 p.m.
r.;
'\
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21 , 2004
City Administrator Hansen stated that he has received a request to place a flyer in the
City's newsletter relating to the Cut & Cover option. He stated that the newsletter is for.
city information however has inserted information from the Chamber in the past. He
continued by saying that Ms. Gail Pundsack has put a great amount of work into this
project and her flyer probably would be valuable in getting additional public comment,
however he had concerns that the flyer is biased in favor of the concept, and if this were
a City insert it would be a more balance approach. He felt that the decision to insert the
flyer in the City's newsletter was a Council decision rather than one he should make.
"
...
Council member Rheinberger stated he was in favor of inserting the flyer into the
newsletter to get additional public comment.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated that he is a strong advocate of the getting the Cut and
Cover into the EIS, however in the past information such as this has been reviewed and
revised to have a more unbiased approach and felt that maybe the Chamber newsletter
would be a better venue for this flyer. He was afraid that allowing this would possibly be
an opening for other organizations to use the City's newsletter as a venue for promoting
their issues.
Mayor Kimble agreed with Councilmember Milbrandt that it is biased and it does not
seem appropriate to put in the City newsletter. He stated that the two city councils
would be meeting to discuss the cut and cover option tomorrow. He also stated that the
EIS is out for public comment until October 6. He stated that he is also supportive of
the Cut and Cover concept. He stated that the City Council has not approved the .
concept and it won't be discussed until tomorrow's meeting.
Councilmember Junker stated that at the Chamber meeting it was discussed that it
would go out as a separate mailing, however they must have done some research as to
cost of mailing and thought it would be advantageous to put it with the City's newsletter.
He agreed that it may not be as unbiased as possible, but they are trying to get this into
as many hands as possible. He also agreed with Councilmember Milbrandt that he
does not want the possible approval to be construed as a venue for other organizations
to use.
Councilmember Kriesel stated he would be in favor of the insert if there were a
disclaimer on the material. He felt that one of the criticisms Council gets is the
communication of issues such as this. He stated he is uncomfortable with the biased
part of it, but felt it would be beneficial to the citizens.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by CouncilmemberKriesel to allow the Cut
and Cover insert to be placed in the City's newsletter if the timing allows.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Rheinberger, Junker
Nays: Councilmember Milbrandt and Mayor Kimble
CONSENT AGENDA
.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to approve the
Consent Agenda.
Page 2 of 9
".
.
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21, 2004
Ayes: Council members Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
'./
Resolution 2004-190, directing payment of bills
Resolution 2004-191, Approving 2004 and 2005 Grant Agreement for Municipal
Recycling Grant Distribution with Washington County
Approval to purchase two 8401 Rain Train raveling portable sprinklers hose - Parks
Department
Approval of renewal of contract with Inegra for T11ine - MIS
Approval of banner installation - Merry Mall - November 13, 2004 - St. Michaels CCW
Approval of request from Elks Lodge for Lily Lake Tennis Courts for sale of Christmas
trees
Resolution 2004-192, approval of maintenance agreements for three large scale laser
printers - MIS
Resolution 2004-193, approval to release funds from 2004 capital budget - Library
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. ZAM/04-02. This is the dav ~n<:1 ~ime for the oublic hearina to consider a reauest
from Richard and Leah Peterson for a Zonina Mao Amendment chanaina the zonina of a 1.5
acres Darcel located at 7160 Mid Oaks Av~nue from Aaricultural Preservation (AP) to
Lakeshore Residential (LRt Notices were mailed to affected orooertv owners and oublished
in the Stillwater Gazette on Seotember 10. 2004.
.
Community Development Director Russell stated that the Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the zoning amendment request on July 12 and that the Joint Board
held a public hearing on August 25. He stated that both bodies approved the request as
consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and recommended it for approval to the
City Council. He reviewed the request and stated that this zoning designation is
consistent with the large lot single family comprehensive plan proposed land use
designation and the Lakeshore Zoning applied to similar lakeshore parcels on the west
side of Long Lake. He continued by saying that the request has neighborhood
opposition because they feel it would change the character of the area. He stated that
the existing zoning AP is an orderly annexation holding zone anticipating change to the
comprehensive plan land use designation. He stated that all properties that are first
annexed to Stillwater are designated AP until the conforming comprehensive
plan/zoning is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, Joint Board and
City Council.
.
Mayor Kimble opened the public hearing.
Mr. Richard Peterson, 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue, applicant, stated that they have been
looking for a smaller home, but have not found a place that is similar to what they have.
He stated that he would like to split the lot and build a smaller home. He stated he
understands his neighbor's concerns regarding the character of the neighborhood and
the last thing he wants is to change that and felt that this request would not change the
character. He also stated that the covenants expired in 2001 and would have expired in
2003 according to state statute. He stated that the zoning request would be consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the seven lots on the west side of Mid
Oaks are all non-conforming uses and will remain non-conforming uses until the zoning
Page 3 of 9
"
'\;
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21, 2004
gets modified according to the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the lots in the area
are so large that they weren't required to get a notice of this request. He stated that .
their immediate neighbor to the south, Kay and Don Peterson, 7130 Mid Oaks, have
submitted a letter not objecting to the request, and received a letter from the Dustins
who live across the street and they do not oppose the request. He also stated Dr.
Kranz has said he is not opposed to the request, but has not submitted a letter or
attended any of the hearings and that one neighbor, the Burns, are opposed to the
request.
Mr. Peterson stated that one issue that Mr. Keane of Leonard, Street and Deinard
mentions in his letter is related to spot zoning. He stated that the City, in its
Comprehensive Plan, has determined this area should be large lot residential and that
properties across the street are already zoned smaller lot residential and does not meet
any of the normal tests for spot zoning. He felt that the planning was done during the
Comprehensive Plan process. He stated that the home will not be seen from the road
afld this will not change the character. He stated that the neighborhood is concerned
about the cascade of development in the area and that the only cascade in
development would be if the residents want to develop their lots and the lots across the
street could be subdivided into 10,000 square foot lots, if they so chose to do that. He
felt that many of the lots don't have the room to develop due to wetlands or the lake. He
addressed the appraisal on the Kramer property and stated that the property is more
than a city block from their home. He stated that before they put their home on the
market they had two market analyses done and both stated that it would have minor to
no impact on the value of the homes.
.
Ms. Louise Jones, 7079 Mid Oaks, reviewed the history of the area. She stated that her
and her husband looked for land for over 6 months before they found their present
home and have been there for 29 years. She felt that the zoning has never meshed
with the Comprehensive Plan. She stated that even though the original plat didn't mesh
with the zoning across the street the clerk, mayor and town board signed the original
plat to leave it this way and it was agreed to leave it that way. She stated that the
people in this area signed covenants to have this area the way it is. She also stated
that at none of the meetings she has attended has there been anyone speaking in favor
of the request, except for the Petersons. She didn't understand why the Council would
want to change their neighborhood and that if the request is approved it will set a
precedent and felt this is not a vision that any Planning Commission or Council vision of
this area would want to see. She felt it was a bad idea. She felt her neighborhood is
different, wants it to stay different and is concerned that what is built will have an impact
on their property value. She stated that even though she wants the Petersons to stay,
what they are doing is not in the best interest of the neighborhood.
Ms. Deidre Kramer, 7100 Mid Oaks, asked if the Council received the letter from the
neighbo'rs and her letter against the request. Council acknowledged that they had the
letters. She stated that she has spoken at all the meetings and stated they have
retained an attorney who specializes in this area who will speak later. She stated that
large lots define the uniqueness of their neighborhood in the City of Stillwater, respect a
for the lake and natural features of the land and can be only maintained by the integritY'W'
of the large lots in the area. She believes that the property values will be adversely
affected if the subdivision is approved. She stated that when they bought their home
they relied on the fact that the neighborhood would retain its character. She stated
Page 4 of 9
.
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21, 2004
there are two decisions that appear to be in conflict, the plat in 1973 and the
Comprehensive Plan in 1996. She stated that the Peterson's proposal is a very bad
idea because it is building near a wetland, establishing a small lot amidst lots that are
twice the size and there is significant neighborhood opposition. She felt that the City
was meant to protect them from these ideas and that the City created this dilemma
when the Comprehensive Plan was developed and asked the City to make a correction
to the Comprehensive Plan. She stated that Mr. Peterson's offer to draft covenants
after he would get to subdivide and didn't think that was a good deal. She encouraged
the Council to create a new zoning category that will protect the neighborhood.
Mr. Charlie King, 7030 Mid Oaks, spoke against the rezoning and asked Council to
protect and preserve the character of the neighborhood.
Mr. Edward Otis, Stillwater Township, stated that because his property is similar and
could be annexed in 2015, that what Council does today could impact his property as
well. He stated that he attended many of the Comprehensive Plan meetings. He stated
that things have changed since the agreement of annexation. He stated it is very
confusing to understand what the City is doing. He read from the original
comprehensive plan and asked why is the history of downtown and its neighborhoods
any different than the history of a neighborhood that has been here for a long time. He
also stated that this area is also unique and should remain as it is. He asked that
Council allow the diversity of neighborhoods in the community.
.
Ms. Heidi Burns, 7190 Mid Oaks, spoke against the request because it will change the
character, charm and uniqueness of the neighborhood and felt the property values will
suffer. She also felt that the City has a responsibility to protect its citizens and it should
realize how it will affect this neighborhood.
.
Mr. Dave Jones, 7079 Mid Oaks, asked for a special zoning for the neighborhood to
maintain its character of the neighborhood. He stated that he has talked to most of the
neighbors who have provided affidavits not opposed to the request and he felt that not
being opposed doesn't mean they are in favor because it is very hard for neighbors to
say it is a bad idea and didn't feel that Mr. Peterson may not have the support he
portrays he has.
Mr. Richard Huelsmann, 12610 62nd Street N, stated that there was a similar situation
on 62nd Street and requested at that time that the zoning and Comprehensive Plan be
reconciled and made clear. He stated that the requestor of the subdivision on 62nd
Street assured the residents that a fine group of homes would be in this subdivision,
however now a Wausau home is being constructed on a lot. He stated that there were
many meetings prior to the annexation and many concerns were brought up. They did
not want to be brought into the City, but they were assured that these residents would
be taken care of and were assured by the Township Board and representatives of the
City that there would be no subnitive changes to essence of the existing zoning. He
stated that he has been disappointed enough times that if Council grants this request he
is willing to support anyone physically and financially to bring this issue to a head. He
felt that it is time to clarify these issues and not have people's lives disrupted. He stated
that they were led to believe that the paragraph on Page 3.7 of the 1996
Comprehensive Plan entitled "Semi-Rural Land Use" covered their situations, which he
quoted. He stated that there are two parts to the AP zoning the first part to preserve
Page 5 of 9
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21,2004
open space and natural areas and that the second part is being misinterpreted and
misapplied. He felt that people are using a loophole and not interpreting the entire .
paragraph relating to the AP zoning. He stated he raised concerns and was told they
were grand fathered in and nothing will happen. He requested that any further spot
zoning be put on hold until a thorough review is considered and the inconsistencies in
the Comprehensive Plan and related zoning are reviewed and resolved. He stated that
at the last joint board meeting Councilmembers Milbrandt and Junker recommended
such a review and institutes a moratorium until it is resolved.
Mr. Tim Keane, Leonard, Street & Deinard, representing Wes and Deirdre Kramer
spoke in opposition to the request. He provided his background to the Council. He
stated that the problem is the in-between land use pattern and it's not a solid fit between
zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that Mr. Huelsmann gave a terrific
analysis of the purpose and application of the AP zoning district, the history of these
very important neighborhoods and the need for their preservation. He stated that he
could not find a policy supporting this rezoning of the Comprehensive Plan, except for
Mr. Huelsmann's quotation of the plan, but on page 3.5 of the land use element, which
mentions that the City strongly supports measures to preserve natural resource and
open space area and to maintain area unique, natural and historic character. He also
stated that the zoning ordinance requiring the Council reach certain findings in
amending the zoning ordinance. He stated that he doesn't see any public necessity to
warrant the amendment; there is private benefit here at the detriment of others, it should
not be supported. He stated that the Kremer's appraisal states that this request has no
benefit to the Kramer's or the neighbors but will have an adverse affect on their home .
value. He stated that looking at the proposed zoning and it is spot zoning, which meet
the definition of spot zoning.
Mr. Don McKenzie, 12620 72nd Street, stated that the lakeshore on the lot is only 50 feet
and that is unusual for Long Lake. He requested that change be made to increase the
lakeshore.
Mr. Peterson stated that he would be willing to make the lakeshore larger because it
depends on how the lot is configured and that has not been determined until a decision
is made on the zoning. He responded to Mr. Keane's spot zoning comment in that the
planning was done with the Comp Plan and that some of the properties surrounding this
area are much smaller. He stated that State Statute states that within 9 months of
adopting a Comprehensive Plan the zoning must be changed to fit the plan. He stated
that it would not look any different.
Mayor Kimble closed the public hearing.
City Attorney Magnuson stated that it is true that there is a statute that when there is a
change in the Comprehensive Plan the zoning must be changed to fit the plan. He
reviewed the history of the Comprehensive Plan process, annexation agreement, and
the designation of agricultural. He felt that if the property were zoned commercial it
would be spot zoning, but with the property that surrounds it did not feel it was spot .
zoning.
Council member Rheinberger spoke in favor of the zoning map change because the
property owners had 25 years notice that it could be coming with the covenants to
Page 6 of 9
~'
.
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21, 2004
expire in 2001 and they did not renew those covenants and that the annexation
agreement provided an agreed upon mechanism on how zoning would be changed. He
felt that no one took any corrective actions and all parties had sufficient notice to make
corrections or provide protective covenants.
Council member Junker asked if this is the time to review a larger zoning designation.
Community Development Director Russell stated that it should be discussed as a
separate issue and not as part of this review. He reviewed the history of the
designation of the zoning of the areas of Mid Oaks, 62nd Street, etc. and stated that
when this was discussed there were two sides, one to preserve the character of the
area and the others who wanted to be able to subdivide their land.
City Attorney Magnuson stated that the annexation agreement holds a lot of protection
for homes brought into the City without urban services. He stated that Mid Oaks
already has sewer and water.
Councilmember Kriesel was concerned that the residents did not preserve this area by
renewing the covenants and asked if there was thought to zoning to preserve the
character at the time.
Mr. Russell stated that the agreement was to provide options to the residents whether
they wanted to subdivide or not subdivide.
.
Council member Junker stated the Mid Oaks area is unique and can control its own
destiny, however he wants to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated it does not feel right and felt he would have to vote
against the request because there are some unique areas in Stillwater and they should
be preserved. He also stated that if it does pass that Council direct staff to look at all
the AP areas.
Mayor Kimble asked could a moratorium be done until this issue is resolved.
City Attorney Magnuson advised the Council that he would have to check on a
moratorium issue because there have been some changes, however this request can
not be tabled to study this issue because of the 60-day rule.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Council member Junker approving the
first reading of an ordinance amending the zoning map and directing City Attorney Magnuson
to prepare findings.c,
Ayes: Councilmember Rheinberger, Junker, and Mayor Kimble
Nays: Councilmembers Milbrandt and Kriesel
.
Motion by Council member Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger directing staff
to review all the AP areas. All in favor.
Mayor Kimble recessed the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
Page 7 of 9
City Council Meeting - 04-22
September 21,2004
\.
Mayor Kimble reconvened the meeting at 8:15 p.m.
.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
Possible aooroval of Iiouor license transfer from Timber Lodoe Inc.. DBA: Timber Lodoe
." -
Steakhouse to Ponies Soorts Bar and Grill. InG. DBA: Ponies Soorts Bar and Grill
Mayor Kimble reviewed the memo from City Clerk Ward regarding the liquor license
transfer to the Ponies Sports Bar and Grill, Inc., subject to approval by police, fire,
building inspection, finance and liquor control.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to adopt
Resolution 2004-195, approving transfer of on-sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor license for
Ponies Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., DBA: Ponies Sports Bar & Grill for the Year 2004.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Possible authorization for feasibilitv reoort for 2005 street imorovement
.
Public Works Director Eckles requested authorization to proceed with a feasibility report
for the 2005 street improvements. He stated that staff has updated the Pavement
Management Study and that that following have a pavement rating of poor or worst. He
stated that the improvements would include street, sidewalk, sewer, water and storm
sewer improvements on Hancock Street from Third to Seventh Street, Fifth Street from
Orleans to Churchill, Marsh Street from Third to Sixth Street, Owens Street from Olive
Street to Willard Street, Ramsey, Oak, Olive and Willard Street from Greeley to Owens
and Deerpath and Deerpath Court.
Councilmember Milbrandt requested that an alternative be added so that if bids come in
lower that additional streets be added to the project. He also requested that a map of
street improvements by year be given to Council for reference.
Motion by Councilmember Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to adopt
Resolution 2004-196, resolution ordering preparation of report for 2005 street improvements.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Possible bid award for oedestrian ramo oroiect
Public Works Director Eckles stated that there are a fair amount of intersections in the.
City that have curb radii without proper pedestrian ramps. He stated that ramps were
last improved in 2003 with approximately 120 ramps improved. He stated that various
Page 8 of 9
.
.
.
City Council Meeting - 04-22 September 21,2004
intersections would be improved and that the low quote for the project is from Bailey
Construction in the amount of $27,235.00.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to adopt
Resolution 2004-197, accepting quotes and awarding contract for pedestrian ramp
improvement.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
COMMUNICA TIONS/REQUESTS
Mayor Kimble stated that Council received communications commending the City staff
and contractor on their performance and treatment of the residents during the
construction of the North Hill project.
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
Councilmember Junker commended Mr. Eckles and his staff in Public Works on the
great job they did on Lowell Park.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Kriesel, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to adjourn the
meeting at 9: 18 p.m. All in favor.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
Resolution 2004-190, directing payment of bills
Resolution 2004-191, Approving 2004 and 2005 Grant Agreement for Municipal
Recycling Grant Distribution with Washington County
Resolution 2004-192, approval of maintenance agreements for three large scale laser
printers - MIS
Resolution 2004-193, approval to release funds from 2004 capital budget - Library
Resolution 2004-194, approving the time extension request by Tower Asphalt for the
Main Street parking improvement.
Resolution 2004-195, approving transfer of on-sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor
license for Ponies Sports Bar & Grill, Inc., DBA: Ponies Sports Bar & Grill for the Year
2004.
Resolution 2004-196, resolution ordering preparation of report for 2005 street
improvements.
Resolution 2004-197, accepting quotes and awarding contract for pedestrian ramp
improvement
Page 9 of 9
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 04-23
September 22, 2004
SPECIAL MEETING
6:00 P.M.
Acting Mayor Junker called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Present:
Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Junker and Mayor Kimble
(arrived at 6:05)
None
Absent:
Others Present: City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Public Works Director Eckles
Community Development Director Russell
City Clerk Ward
Mayor David Beaudet - Oak Park Heights
Council member Mark Swanson - Oak Park Heights
Council member Les Abrahamson - Oak Park Heights
Councilmember Mary McComber - Oak Park Heights
County Administrator Jim Schug
County Commissioner Nile Kriesel
Rick Arnebeck, Mn/DOT
OTHER BUSINESS
.
Workshoo between the Citv Councils of Stillwater. Oak Park Heiahts. Mn/DOT and
Washinaton Countv to discuss T.H. 36 Partnershio Studv Alternatives
Mr. Rick Arnebeck, Mn/DOT, stated that some critical decisions in the project development for
this project are coming in the near future and requested input and guidance regarding some
decisions that Mn/DOT must make. He reviewed the municipal consent process because the
statutes have changed. They are as follows: 1. Old municipal consent process (90+ day
appeal process) Under the old process, MS 161.17- (there are three elements to the municipal
consent process); Corridor proposal Submit proposal, hold hearing and approve in 120 days;
Layout Plan Hearing - 90-120 days, adopt within 180 days Revisions - approve within 60 days;
Construction Plan - Submit 120 days before bid Conformance to layout - if in compliance - no
action required. 2. New municipal consent process (90 day appeal process) Under the new
process, MS 161.162- (there are two elements to the municipal consent process) Submit final
layout, schedule hearing; approve within 90 days of hearing; Construction plans to be
submitted if changes from layout and approve within 60 days; construction Plans submitted to
local government in 45 days before the bid informational purposes.
.
Mr. Arnebeck stated that both councils have a concern with the anticipated impacts on the
business community along TH 36 if "Concept F" were constructed and that the Councils have
requested Mn/DOT to look at other options including a "cut and cover" concept. He reviewed
previous cOl")cepts that were developed in the Partnership Study, the concept that was
previously approved as part of the 1995 project and the "cut and cover" concept. He continued
by providing a status report of where Mn/DOT is in the overall project development process.
City Council Meeting 04-23
September 22, 2004
After considerable discussion it was the consensus of the two Councils that Concept F will . .
have too much of an impact on the business community and there is no local support for it to
be included in the "preferred alternative" for the project at this time. There is unified support
from local community that the "cut and cover concept" needs to be flushed out in more detail
for consideration as a long term solution for the reconstruction of TH 36 between Osgood and
TH 5 (at grade intersections are not a viable long term solution). A long term solution for this
segment needs to be addressed up front as a part of the river crossing project. There is a need
to recognize the political realities of funding and the critical need to have unified support for
this project if we hope to be successful.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Council member Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to adjourn the
meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
.
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
Page 2 of 2
.^
,;,
.
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2004-198
.
1 0,000 Lakes Chapter of ICC Membership
Abacus Copy Systems, Inc.
Ace Rental
Action Rental
American Flagpole & Flag Co.
American Payment Centers
Ancom Technical Center
AnokaTechnical College
Arch Wireless
Arcon Construction Co., Inc.
AWl Diversified
Bachmans
Becker Arena Products, Inc.
Carquest
Chemsearch
Clark, Luann
Coca Cola
Com cast
Cole Papers
Cornerstone Land Surveying, Inc.
Cub Foods
Duo-Safety Ladder Corporation
Election Systems & Software
Express Photo
Fed Ex
First Line Beverage
Force America
Fred's Tire
Gerrard Packaging
Happy's
Hennepin Technical College
Ikon Office Solutions
Insight
Johnson,Ron
JSP Custom Graphics
Lake Country Door, Inc.
Lake View Hospital
Legran Homes
LMC
MacQueen Equipment
Magnuson Law Firm
McDonald Construction
Menards
MN Dept of Public Safety
.
Membership
Thermal Fuse, Cleaning Blade
Maintenance Supplies
Concrete Trailer
US Flag
Box Service Oct - Dec 2004
Repaired Squad 205
Terrorism Symposium
Pagers
North Hill Phase 2 & 3
Stainless Skid
Maple & Oak Trees for Legends
Rubber Mats, Threshold
Vehicle Repair Supplies
Hand Wipes
Clean City Hall
Concession Supplies
Cable
Paper Towels
Adamic Parcel
Concession Supplies
Rope and End Caps
Sign Barricade
Processing
Freight
Concession Supplies
Repair Parts Truck # 5
Tire Repair
Sign Material
Tire Repair
Education
Maintenance Agreement
Tape Cleaning Cartridge
Brackets, Fuel
Pavers for Pioneer Park
Repair Garage Doors Public Works Bldg.
Blood Draws
Grading Escrow Refund
Conference Registration
Equipment Repair Supplies
Professional Services
Grading Escrow Refund
Maintenance Supplies
Training
50.00
132.60
571.49
138.45
51.65
78.00
144.11
150.00
66.22
623,319.35
85.00
1,540.79
444.16
14.91
255.44
108.37
637.85
66.48
177.17
2,012.00
43.25
61 .49
176.86
4.63
21.78
245.61
1,038.38
36.64
324.08
22.66
20.00
623.26
23.96
175.48
434.75
832.72
40.00
7,500.00
945.00
206.21
7,354.83
9,000.00
23.95
180.00
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2004-198
Buberl, Larry
Carquest
Clarey's
Clark, Luann
Courage Cards & Gifts
Cub
Cy's Uniforms
Dell Computer
Emergency Apparatus
Foremost Promotions
Heritage Printing
Holiday
Insight
Jacobson, Cynthia
Jansens Cleaning Service
Johnson Controls
Knauss, Chantell
Legislative Associates, Inc.
Met Council
MN Dept of Administration
Nextel
Office Depot
Qwest
Russell, Steve
Service Master
Stillwater Lions
Territorial Springs LLC
Turning Point
Verizon Wireless
Wrap & Ship
Xcel
Adopted by the City Council this
5th Day of October, 2004
Page 3
September Animal Transports
Oil, Solvent
Repair Harness
Clean Public Works
Christmas Cards
Russian Delegation Refreshments
Uniforms
Laptop Computer
Repair 6109
Pads
Newsletter
Fuel
Tape Drive, Cleaning Cartridges
Reimburse for Title Application Vehicle
September Maintenance Agreement
Repair Condensor Fan, Refridgerant
Reimburse Expenses
September Legislative Services
September SAC
3rd Quarter Building Permit Surcharge
Cell Phones
Office Supplies
Telephone
Reimburse Expenses State Planning Conf
Window Cleaning
Membership
Draw #1 Tif Note # 2
Envelopes
Cell Phones
Freight
Electricity, Gas
,
.
85.00
20.22
309.91
140.00
174.61
28.13
15.87
1,645.55
1,209c52
338.46
1,857.20
32.01
713.72
13.50
225.00
1,793.88
83.33
3,833.33
21,384.00
8,651.31
236.93
325.05
215.43
310.05
515.00
100.00
338,528.61
303.53
235.03
42.51
11,740.24
.
Total 1,328,335.05
.
~
~"\~€-D
CITY OF STILLWATER
MEMORANDUM
.
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Sharon Harrison, Finance Direct~
October 5, 2004
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Utility Bill Adjustments - Sewer Charges
Descriotion Recommendation
1 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05
to useage of 22,000 gallons
2 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 13,000 gallons
3 Leaky Toilet Reduce Jul 04, Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 17 ,000 gallons
4 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 10,000 gallons
5 Additional Persons in Household Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 12,000 gallons
6 Water Heater Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 23,000 gallons
7 Leaky Faucets Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 10,000 gallons
.
.
.,
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Larry Hansen, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Transfer of Special Assessment Balances for 1616 West Olive
DISCUSSION:
Our Saviors Lutheran Church has submitted a request to Washington County for a lot
combination to combine three lots into one located at 1616 West Olive.
This memo is to receive approval through the concent agenda for the transfer of
the special assessment balances to the newly created parcel.
OLD PROPERTY #'s
S/A Balance
29.030.20.42.0002
29.030.20.43.0001
29.030.20.44.0091
$0.00
$2,263.89
$1,051.23
NEW PROPERTY #
29.030.20.42.0042
$3,315.12
The assessments being transferred are for Local Improvement #340 Lily Lake Water
Quality Phase I.
'\
.
Y~emo
DATE:
October 5,2004
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Chantell Knaus~L?1,)
Director of Administration
FROM:
RE:
Roof Repairs
I
Over the past winter, there were issues with water leaking into the City Hall. Attached are 2
quotes: one from Atomic Architectural Sheet Metal, Inc. and one from Metro Electric
Construction Co.
The quote of $7,300 from Atomic is for the installation of24 gauge pre-finished counter flashing
on the existing stone cap of the roof. If the flashing is not installed, the City WIll need to conduct .
preventive maintenance on the soft joints of the roof every 3-5 years.
The quote of $6,270 from Metro Electric is for the installation of heat tape in the gutter and
down spouts on the north side of the building. It is the architect's (BWBR) belief that water is
freezing in the gutter and creating a dam, causing water to leak into the building.
BWBR has offered to contribute $1,000 toward this project. Staffwould like to complete this
project before this winter in order to alleviate future problems.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council approve a total Capital Expenditure of$13,570 for City Hall
RoofImprovements with the expectation that BWBR will reimburse the City for $1,000 ofthe
. \
project.
.
VV:80 VO, 90/01 3WIl X~
: NOIlljJOl
.'
ATOMIC
ARCHITECTURAL,
SHEET METAL INC.
P.O. BOX926, STIlLWATER, MNc 55082,
Office ,651;646-1706
Fax 6~1~646-1684
~ ':
TO: George W. Olsen Construction Co., Inc.
ATIN: Jeff Olsen
QUOTE #: 2:
PROJECT: SnillwaterCity Hall
LOCA TION:,Stillwarer. MN.
x
Proposal
o "Addendum's N~ted
This quote includes all material. labor, <<juiprnent,and npplic;lble State SalesTaxes neCeSG<lTYlo complete the fonowi~i work~
STONE CAP FLASHING:
1. Furnish & install standard color 24 gauge pre-finished ($late Gray)'c()~)Ilter.fla.shing:overc
exisring. stone cap, with continuous keeper strip, .
WNE .'A"
Material =$600.00 Dollars
Labor == $1.200.00 Dollars
.
ZONE 4\B~l
Material ;;;$900,00 Dollars
Labor = $1,200.00 Dollars
ZONE"D"
Material:;: $1.000.00 Dollars
Labor = $1,000.00 Dollars
. ',/,.,"",
/,.',
OD
1\.. ..1; .
. "
ZONE "C"
Material = $600.00 Dollars
Labor = $800.00 Dollars
,
ATOMIC Architectural Sheet Motal Inc.
A.cceptance: c
.
BY: ~M4 'P, '1fJ~
,
BY:
DATE: 10-04-04
This quotation is vl.'llid for 60 days.
DATE: P.O.
Please s:ignand return \.vith a purchase order. c.
"I"d 7/7',i
I 7 r n . 0 hl3 S 19.p. 9 '[ 9 9
:'"1TWn,1 ~
~
1l1\l\fCi7: h ~ ~nn7. . C 'lJn~on-:
Unlell~ llgr~t.llll wfltlng, payment for all invoices shall be <We n(t JO day.$, afte:r whi6hintefC8t shall},';",. rate "of 1;5% pc;r month to tho
tll1pllid balaricl!I. AtOmlc Archi~cUIal Sheet Metal, me, may stop ,watk in progreSIl. fi]all lien to tyrotept rnedebt. bring ~Uil. Or i..ke a.ny oth~
Il.cuon a.nih.blo tQ ooll<:ct the debt /f invoices o.n: not pit/d. CHenl Dgrt:estc P"~ l\1l c06t>li~~.inco]Jecling.the debt.
SEP 08
2004
10:26
HP
LRSERJET
3200
,..
r':: ~.;J. 1 " '
, ~~"',,, '., .!dJ:.:rJ"a' Ir:' . 2
'€fTV< .'., .; ~;.J,fiD'"
',.;Lc ...... " ;J.i.;,HA~Ji/';;'
'.' ."..,>>)::~-~.~~>~{~
." :;;));t';,;;.:'j;::t:; ;<.:j,
"c. e e' 0;;/' __e .,ee'.,'e ~ e'" It'
~i;~'<';~','~.:f":f~t~,i~;t~~~":,';.'r,.."\..' ".';:'.. ...,el..,:,.\,.!.': ,~..tt.~,
'.', ",_<:":;':,:;:_.i,;:,~:S;e;;~;-": _ :. e,' e
'. ' . "i,;,~);j;';1:!'
.....:-.
~ ,'.-
~E;-
) :..' :
lUNf!.
\'C .,
1
-'
~'. < r"
. -~. .'
;--'~' .
",::,./ --,/',.'.,'.'~":'
i'\ t.. '.
/: .::
." ;.... ':'
./~
"'.:_ ,Uf'. .,"-:
t
, ~ ;
'e
.I .:
.' ~ ......
.-;'
~.>.
.,;;......t
.".
. .-t"
"
,
.,;,-.:,. .." ".
l ", "- ..: ,........ ," :...
> :,,~e':.~t;~l. e:.
,,:.i'~>'MJi~le.: . : ".... ',,>~ __,;..,e,;.
';',:", ~~T,ee<,. .,
. " ',_ .: ...;;. ;.,1
'.:' >~~)~~~ ,~: ...:-.:~:t~:~,:.
~IlLER~e '., NEa.I;';':':' ,
:.:..e:'.ee'~r.'E.e:'~,.. '~;ee" . r'e:,,<::-':'L.'
.' _n;cJ{:',>~ e.e ...
":~oi1~..'~~".'. "'~~.
..' . .... ::<!
"~~~ ..
".\..
". \"
-
.- ,.-.-:...
.. ~~, ,', .: .
. '~"".I~~':k!j; ....
e.~"..:;->,.~ee..e.e..ee
;
.'
..it..~
..:',:;."
,," ~.< ":~:
.. .....
. .."
~. ....
. .' ;~:' ~ - ~..~%.:. ~ :
:. _ " i.:
. . .' .....~
~'
,..:~ ~~~~~.~-_.
"".~ .'eo,
. ".\. .
..:.,~;.....::1E..:~N~
. ,:. '.: -s;;.
~" .'
"J"
~::eee~:/.l
'e 0eticU:~:
- .... ~ ~... .~. .'. '
~ _; " ,... _ :r.
'~:r
..... .~~.
..-:; .., ~
,~ ~,' '" :":..' : .:....~;; -.!
'. :.,:::~ ~:: --: .' ';"::~,<:
,.
.:....
.". .
.,
.".':
. .'
.' e
~~ .
:f.
... .
....
. . "~:a.::' ~
'lie .'
.j
~iNG~' '".e ",':':-: '~'~~', .' '. ..: :
, eeAMs T^ =c' ~ e3..'
!QJNA' ,". y,~ 11-,OC e'e'
,t' TE'.5!AMl~~e '. ' .
I.5AT~ TO~TrcN&e'IUITJ,e'
cWO" VERTlrAI ~.I"'
~e~~,f~!~ ATE,
.' . . e."H Ii::lA,. e ROCF
....
~,":.. ~
.#: ''Ii'
"f> '
" .
,
, '" .
','
."
, ,"
:
SEP 08 2004 10:27
p.3
''?(l&l~:i- · . ..
. 'e~':"", ',:e' ": .,'.' '.~'"
',:~ .':<....'~:t:2~$-
.;! ...i...... ......' . ': l'I,.<~~#~~~,.<:
", < '. . ,.'.' :~J~E'SRJ;tPJ~J.~Qt :~<;,':;
~::. 1'<<" :~i.4Jlj?[~'QE~!lkSe,</' "
, 'J s;~r _
, . '.:. 'ME,tAL,'RjAliHi~'
J h" e, 'r '.,,, " to,MAtCJ.tl~;'
'e C~::PROVlOE 'Cet.lTIN. ,
".-';~ ' J~~F.ER:,','. .....,
'. . . " ". . . ?;~,'~..~,{,,~o~~
- e 'e e, Ye -" , c';,. e ~f.(;OL' f("' tfc, M.....,~
'} e. ", ' . e' :'" ',' e/(', , _, . ~.,~ ',::~~/;,::,'~~~~~:':~~'~,,':~ ,'. _ -e:}(, ~ ""J~ ';~~ J~
. e~~1.4 ''''_ _' e. . , . '.e (e '~ ; ~ <~';'}~.-,::..i'~'::':;"e~':e<t~: " ~:t1(""e '. e _er
.,".. '. ~. \.'\"-'\"~~''''I..,..':~ .~,..j,_
,," c" . e / -:'e'. ., e ~. ,....}, e e ~ROD AND '$tlt.. ,
" .'~ )\::t/(r'..Y ...'.' ."':~,~~~i0;~:~~f~ ~~~..,..'.' ,.
0...::;.::.::. "":'e' , ',', e ,~ ~-:-,;' ""../:',.' e'e ,.'. ,::.ee :':'.": e;
~. ' ee e e . ~ e' ''c'. '''~' e ,~ TOPCJr..Ol:cK1lS
,.,:e.'$lANOHS'$Ai"f'. ,e J: e: (Je. e e. ~'GJ'e ',e' >':,", 'e ':,,, ,.' "e'e , .ELI3~._~n"', '
~'~eec1EfA9 c.' .
, , > e e' ,c.' :., ',::e ",',e: e '.,~:0/.. '.e:' .'e' t~TEE4,.:a{'~; e ,
.' ....'~~:.;r~..I.N.".L',., . ~;;,. ~ . .......;~." ,
;,l.~~~.~;(;~: ....'...~(?',......~.~~~.:'~.
- / 'H'/ ..~ ' ., e
':. :)~"x,/;i r ~~W'F;:',<:~;~~".,. . .... . . . .
. ..ll.5ECrfOO"PEIAJL:; 'e, '.'>0 ~".
,,;e, e"~' oh~,:c~~c:o:()'~" \!iE:O~'E""vl=rX:':It'i'I/~:";" e;'., ....,
- ~ .'. . . .: "." . '.f"vvr~:.~~\.:J~"~'I..I- 'Y'l;rs- - . ~r'.~"\jQ \;,.ll~."/~~ .""
'. :~T~:$EA/1~~' ~,'" A': '::J,II1J;..:"~~H":',': J:~':." " ,:.',:.' " '.e""'f(.e ',." ~eee~~A~~T~19..o .
,'ttl. ~.. ." . ~ - . .. ~ rrP:. . ,'.,
'e e' e. I' -' e" ~. e e' .' e e' ':e' ee at coN&Tt'1ICTION..
.' ". ....~... I'~~j~:' '::';:7'::e~:' .
. ;e .0' .,,-1 e e':<':r.;. "". /.- ";I~1&"HeTeTLO& 'e \
e'. e,:?~ e,' ::, :~~~;~~~_~e~e:'e~:e.,.. ;.:../// ~:','::::,~\:~;R~~">'>
~l~~~:~~ ~..,,-;~>"'::~~:'~.~:;> '.' V/:. . 'e ~ArED'I1OeiKc,. e (
. L1<:. '-:':~ ~;;.?::.."Y-::: 1 ' ~- :-:/'-~:v ." .... ."!.'.. _ .
e CEIL~ .' :e ,,~" :::>~;.., :;:'e. .' " /, /e e: e 60T a: ff'$C~,T ~
::t:4.(";;;Atiit~: ./r;~~ .(,BOT~::~~' .., .
~E;WAl3, .' .... 'Y;'e.O:-. ',.<~. "~.';. iBn......~..'..,.,..,.. "'~ ....~..... .... E,L:.!~'I).' ',..;
" , ;C' ,",' ' ",,; .'. ' " '. .' J~",I".1'I\ ___~ . =AI' AI<IT' e.
. i..1r'\ 'PIC>IM,.-,
)'.,
HP LASE<?JET 3200
'v ......;
t 5
'-, .(
"
"."". .' .#
JDING'seAM, METAL:.::
rAIL'
.- ~ . .
'$lEEl METAtRlO6E<CAPTO
.i1J\rc~~~6l'~~IER
'. .
.,' eeH:ETMfTAL'KEEFE~, .'
. ... e'.'ENbc-~~eY ROCf~I~~
: ",.' '::'-',-:. ::,. . :.: ,":". ..,..~':. .;; , ":::
. '~T.a.NP~5E.AM
,ROCf~~E2'E/A~~
J ':c-...
. . f _.. :; :.n~ .
'E"""VC"'....N:r"e: .e: "
'.. -
." - . - -
. . '.-
'.- ::'.. ,"; - . -.-~.' .'-
. ..' - - ~ - , '-
~
10/05/2004 TUE 11:10 FAX 612+588+6748 METRO ELECTRIC
~ 001/002-
"'
METRO ELECTRIC CONST. CO.
2825 North Second Street --- Minneapolis, MN 55411
Phone: (612) 588-6658 --- Fax (612) 588-6748
.
Facsimile Cover Sheet
To:
Company:
Phone:
Fax:
Chantell Knauss
City Of Stillwater
651-430-8805
651-430-8809
From:
Date:
Pages! including this cover:
Milton R. Ost
1 OJ05J04
2
Messaae:
Project: Stillwater City Hall
Subject; Gutter Heat Tape System Revised Cost
The following is our cost for a complete gutter heat tape system per sheet dated November II, 1998 from George w.
Olson Construction CO., Tnc. and received via fax from City of Stillwater 011 10/5/04.
.
Total Cost = $6,270.00
This cost is based on us being able to install heat tapes before gutter/down spouts are filled with ice and weather
conditions are penllitting for our work to be completed.
Please call me should you have any questions.
Thank You!
~t4
Milton R. Ost
~t~OEJ8~J")~9.J:1~~ .
This message Is Intended only for the use of the IndIvIdual or entIty to whlclllt Is addressed and may contain Information that Is prlVl\9g9d, confld9ntlal, and .
9x9mpt Irom dlsclosuro UMcr applicable law. "the reader of this messago IS not tho Intendod roclplent. or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
mess:\ge to tho intend9C1 rQClplont. you aro horoby notll/cd that any dlSsomlnation. C1istl'ibulion or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you hav
j"(jceived this communicatIon In error. please notIfy us Immedlalely by tolephone anCl return tho original to us at the above address Iria the U.S. postal Service.
Thank you.
Please contact Metro Electric at the phone number above Jf problems with transmlS$lon occur.
LOCAT I mJ : 612+588+6748
RX TIME 10/05 '04 10:29
, 10/05/2004 TOE 11:10 FAX 612+588+6748 METRO ELECTRIC
, @.002/002
,.
"
FILE No.478 10/05 '04 09:15 ID:CITY OF STILLWATER
FAX:6514308S09
PAGE 3/ 3
.~
George W. Olsen Construction Co.~ Inc.
1902 S. Greeley St. l.
P.O. Box 20
Stillwater, MN 55082
Phone: 651-439-5410
Fax: 651~439L8555
FAXTRANSJ\1..n'lAL COVER SHEET
Date: November 11.1998
Time: 8:45AM
To: Metro Electric
, Attn::Milt
Fax #: 588-6748.
.
Re:
Stillwater CitvHalt Stillwater_ MN
From: Jeff Olsen
Remarks: Dear Milt:
As net ourn;l.v.me cC):n.v~satioI;1, ve!rterdav. nlep..<:esu1;>mit a oUoteto
mv office bvNovember 19, 1998 to~sh and install acomDlete,h~tane SYstem
at north eleV(.ltion gutteJ;' (70') ?I1dtwo (2) dOW!l:~,9Q.l.lts - o.-qem: 22~ and otieat 30'
for the above 1>IQ1(/ct, " '
, MFG: Ravchem OM -Ix - 120 volt sine:le nbase orao~roved eaual.
The followinL~~~ 9<?l}iE!~ 9fnorth vl,~~on aT),Q wall section 6BLA,9 forvour use.
I " ' .
YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 3 PAGE{S), INCLlJDING,uu.s COVER. i)J;:l.MI..t:
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL clP-r- PAGES, PLEASE CALL6S1-439-54!O.
i
.
ORIGlNALS VIA US MAIL: Yes
@
LOCATION:612+588+6748
RX TIME 10/05 '0410 :29
""
.
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2004-198
.
1 0,000 Lakes Chapter of ICC Membership
Abacus ~opy Systems, Inc.
Ace Rental
Action Rental
American Flagpole & Flag Co.
American Payment Centers
Ancom Technical Center
Anoka Technical College
Arch Wireless
Arcon Construction Co., Inc.
AWl Diversified
Bachmans
Becker Arena Products, Inc.
Carquest
Chemsearch
Clark, Luann
Coca Cola
Comcast
Cole Papers
Cornerstone Land Surveying, Inc.
Cub Foods
Duo-Safety Ladder Corporation
Election Systems & Software
Express Photo
Fed Ex
First Line Beverage
Force America
Fred's Tire
Gerrard Packaging
Happy's
Hennepin Technical College
Ikon Office Solutions
Insight
Johnson,Ron
JSP Custom Graphics
Lake Country Door,lnc.
Lake View Hospital
Legran Homes
LMC
MacQueen Equipment
Magnuson Law Firm
McDonald Construction
Menards
MN Dept of Public Safety
.
Membership
Thermal Fuse, Cleaning Blade
Maintenance Supplies
Concrete Trailer
US Flag
Box Service Oct - Dec 2004
Repaired Squad 205
Terrorism Symposium
Pagers
North Hill Phase 2 & 3
Stainless Skid
Maple & Oak Trees for Legends
Rubber Mats, Threshold
Vehicle Repair Supplies
Hand Wipes
Clean City Hall
Concession Supplies
Cable
Paper Towels
Adamic Parcel
Concession Supplies
Rope and End Caps
Sign Barricade
Processing
Freight
Concession Supplies
Repair Parts Truck # 5
Tire Repair
Sign Material
Tire Repair
Education
Maintenance Agreement
Tape Cleaning Cartridge
Brackets, Fuel
Pavers for Pioneer Park
Repair Garage Doors Public Works Bldg.
Blood Draws
Grading Escrow Refund
Conference Registration
Equipment Repair Supplies
Professional Services
Grading Escrow Refund
Maintenance Supplies
Training
50.00
132.60
571.49
138.45
51.65
78.00
144.11
150.00
66.22
623,319.35
85.00
1,540.79
444.16
14.91
255.44
108.37
637.85
66.48
177.17
2,012.00
43.25
61.49
176.86
4.63
21.78
245.61
1,038.38
36.64
324.08
22.66
20.00
623.26
23.96
175.48
434.75
832.72
40.00
7,500.00
945.00
206.21
7,354.83
9,000.00
159.33
180.00
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2004-198
MNlce Arena Manager's Assoc.
MN Pollution Control Agency
MJ Raleigh
Newman Traffic Signs
Office Depot
Office Max
PC Solutions
Press Publications
Quill
Roettger Welding
Rottlund Company
Ruttger's Sugar Lake Lodge
St. Croix Boat & Packet Co.
Streichers
Watson Co.
Sandy's Office Coffee Service
Sprint
Stillwater Equipment Co.
Stillwater Gazette Classified
Stillwater Gazette
T A Schifsky & Sons
Toll
Walmart
Washington County Dept of Assessment
Washington County Financial
Washington CountyTransportation & Physical
Youth's Safety Company
Zoller, Rob
Adopted by the City Council this
5th Day of October, 2004
Page 2
F all Conference
Certification Examinations, Classes
McKusick Ravine 04A, 04B Sewer Intercepto
Sign Material
Office Supplies
Office Supplies
Maintenance Agreement
Publication
Office Supplies
Repair Hose Rack
Grading Escrow Refund
Lodging for Conference
August Arena Billing
Grenades
Concession Supplies
Coffee Service
Cell Phone
Equipment Repair Supplies
Advertisement
Publication
Asphalt
Welding Supplies
Maintenance Supplies
Second Half Property Tax
Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement
Signal Upgrades
Pencils Fire Prevention
Paint
~
.
100.00
659.00
142,949.58
78.58
91.30
227.73
48.00
160.00
67.72
865.00
45,750.00
408.48
33,122.70
493.04
158.66
65.00
54.66
1,105.20
79.75
198.45
313.46
18.99
102.78
1,051.00
9,456.00
4,337.66
473.76
139.42
.
.
.
V ~ernoranc urn
To: Mayor and City Council /
From: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer ~
Date: September 27, 2004
Subject: Approval of Proposal for Snow Removal Services at the St. Croix Valley Recreation
Parking Lot
DISCUSSION
Attached is a proposal from Concrete Masomy Solutions Inc. for the snow removal
purposes for the St. Croix Valley Recreation Center parking lot. Concrete Masomy
Solutions Inc. formally Lehmicke Construction, has supplied snow removal services since
the recreation center was completed. The prices since the original proposal was accepted
have not gone up.
RECOMMENDATION
.
Staff recommends that Council approve Concrete Masomy Solutions Inc proposal for snow
removal services for the St. Croix Valley Recreation Center
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs with staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting a
resolution approving an agreement for snow removal services.
.
APPROVAL AGREEMENT FOR
SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES
2004 - 2005
.
\VHEREAS, Concrete Masonry Solutions Inc. has successfully provided snow removal services
in the past, and agrees to provide snow removal services in accordance with the proposal and specs on file
in the City Clerk's office;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STILL \V A TER, MINNESOTA:
That the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract in the name
of the City with the Concrete Masonry Solutions Inc. for the plowing of said areas for the contract price
aforesaid and in accordance with the proposal and specifications therefore.
Adopted by the Council this 5th day of October 2004.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
.
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
Lehmicke Construction Inc.
13880 Lynch Road N
Hugo, MN 55038
651-351-7440
.
Fax 651-351-0744
Name\Address
City of Stillwater
Diane Ward, City Clerk
2]6 n 4th St
Stillwater, MN 55082
Item
Snowplowing
.
Thank you for your businesse
.
Description
863 Bobcat Single Axle Truck Loader with 5 yard bucket
0_4" snow accumulation price
4-8" snow accumulation price
8+" snow accumulation price
Bobcat with 7' blade
Unit Price per Hour - Estimated time - I Hour
Bobcat 5' bucket
Unit Price per Hour - Estimated time - ] Hour
LEHM]CKE CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANY SLIP OR FALL ACCIDENTS
Signature
Rate
525.00
675.00
800.00
65eOO
65eOO
Total
9/1 6/2004
Estimate
Date
Estimate #
106
Project
Total
0.00
$0.00
AGREEMENT FORM
SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES
2004 - 2005
.
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 2004, by and between
Concrete Masonry Solutions, 1928 S. Greeley Street, Stillwater, MN 55082, party ofthe first part, and the
City of Stillwater, a municipal corporation of Washington County, Minnesota, party of the second part:
WITNESSETH:
The party of the first part agrees to provide a Bobcat or equivalent with snowblower, bucket or angle
blade for the purpose of sidewalk and trail snow removal and heavy equipment for snow removal on
parking lots and upon notification by the City, the party of the first part agrees to perform snow removal
services as specified in the proposal of the said party dated 2004, and in the
snow removal specifications dated October 3,2000, on file in the office of the City Clerk, and made a part
hereof by reference the same as if set out here in full, for and in consideration of the sum of listed on the
attached bid proposal. Payment to be made within thirty days after a legal claim therefore, is presented.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as ofthe day and year first
above written and the same shall be equally binding upon each parties and their successors and assigns.
.
BY
In the presence of:
CITY OF STILLWATER
BY
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
I
.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
Department: Parks
Date: 9-29-04
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Request to purchase and have installed a new play structure for Lily Lake Park.
The current play structure, which was one of our first ones installed in 1986, has
broken parts that we can no longer get parts for.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with
this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
.
The cost is $17,662.09 to be paid out of capital outlay park improvements. This
is not a budgeted item however money is available in the fund.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
Yes
No
~
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY
SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE
COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
'-/- -+.
Submitted by:. - ~/ C
Date: 7-';??- cJ </
.
t
.
.
.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF STILLWATER
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
-,
Sharon Harrison, Finance Directo~
October 5, 2004 \
Utility Bill Adjustments - Sewer Charges
Description Recommendation
1 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05
to useage of 22,000 gallons
2 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 13,000 gallons
3 Leaky Toilet Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 10,000 gallons
4 Additional Persons in Household Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 12,000 gallons
5 Water Heater Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 23,000 gallons
6 Leaky Faucets Reduce Oct 04 & Jan 05 to useage
of 10,000 gallons
.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR GRADING OF CITY LOT
(L.I. 362)
September 17, 2004
Notice is hereby given that the Stillwater City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible
thereafter, October 5, 2004 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 216 N. 4th Street to adopt the proposed
assessment for L.I. 362: Grading of city lot. The following is the area proposed to be assessed:
2310 Boom Road - Part of Govt Lot 1 Beg in W Line of Boom Road 257 ft S of the N line ofSD Sec 21
me as along the SD Wly line of SD Boom Road
The improvements consists of: Grading of city lot - $2,900.00
NO INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID BY NOVEMBER 15,
2004. If payment is not received by November 15, 2004, the amount listed above will be collected over a 5-
year period with interest added at 6% per year on the unpaid balance. The yearly installments will be
.collected with the property taxes that are paid to Washington County. To the first installment shall be added
terest on the entire assessment from the date of the hearing, October 5, 2004 through December 31, 2005. To
each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. Property
owners may at anytime thereafter, prior to November 15th of any year, pay the remaining principal balance (in
whole or part) to the City of Stillwater.
Written or oral objections thereto by any property owner will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be
taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection, signed by the property owner, is filed with
the clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may consider an
objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, if so advised. Upon
such action, affected property owners would receive further notice.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed:
1. The city will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination,
and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed
to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further
questions.
2. After the city has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as
the objector desire. The same procedure for questioning ofthe city's witnesses will be followed with the
objector's witnesses.
.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
3.
The objector may be represented by counsel.
.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to
the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the council.
5e The entire proceedings will be tape-recorded (video-taped).
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the council based
on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving
notice of the appeal upon the mayor or clerk of the city within thirty (30) days after the adoption ofthe
assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the mayor or
clerk.
Under Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 and Stillwater City Code, Chapter 56.05, the Council
may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a
person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments.
The option to defer the payment of special assessments shall terminate and all amounts accumulated plus
applicable interest, shall become due upon the occurrence of any ofthe following events: (a) the death ofthe
owner, provided that the spouse is otherwise not eligible for the benefits hereunder; (b) the sale, transfer or
subdivision of the property or any part thereof; if the property should for any reason lose its homestead status;
or (d) if for any reason the taxing authority deferring payments shall determine that there would be no hardship
to require immediate or partial payment.
.
Any assessed property owners meeting the requirements of this law and the ordinance adopted under it may
apply to the City Clerk. for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of the special assessment on the
property. (Please call City Hall at 430-8813 if you desire more information about the special assessment
deferral).
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
Publish:
Friday, September 17, 2004
Post:
Friday, September 17, 2004
.
" .,
...
,
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Shawn Sanders c.,.c,.
Assistant City Engineer
FROM:
DATE:
October 1, 2004
SUBJECT:
North Hill Sewer Project
Assessment Hearing and Adoption of Assessment Roll
Project 2000-15
DISCUSSION:
The North Hill Project extended city sewer and water to the area in the northeastern comer
of the City where properties were served by private wells and septic systems. The project
extended sanitary sewer and water main from Elm Street at Highway 95 to the North Hill
Area, added a storm sewer system with detention and water quality ponds, and
. reconstructed City streets to urban standards. The feasibility study estimated the. cost of the
project to $6.4M and the project to be constructed over three phases; The first phase, which
is complete extended the sewer main and replaced the water main from Elm Street to
Willow Street. The second phase, which is substantially completed, installed new utilities
and streets to the areas east of Second Street. The third phase, which is now being
constructed, completes the project in the areas west of Second Street, and North of Poplar
Street and Broadway Street from Wilkins to Sycamore Street. The final project cost is
estimated at $6,140,050.82.
Funds for the project are coming from five sources:
Municipal State Aid
Stillwater Water Board
BWSR Grant
General Taxes
Special Assessments
$ 320,000
$ 245,000
$1,300,000
$ 2,678,670.45
$ 1,596,380.37
There are four rates in which the property owners are being assessed.
Sanitary Sewer Main
Water Main
Street
Storm Sewer
$4909.23
$3408.88
$ 47.37 /LF of adjusted frontage
$ 0.01 per SF of contributing area
,~;.
.
Ifthe roll is adopted, property owners have until November 15, 2004 to pay a portion or all
of their assessment with no interest charge on the paid portion. Otherwise the remaining .
balance will be put their tax statement at an interest rate of 4.3% over a twelve-year period.
To date there has been only one objection and that is from the property owner at 110
Lakeside Drive who is objecting the amount of street assessment. In this case, for 80 feet of
ttontage even though this lot measures 57 feet. Our assessment for irregular shape lot uses
the setback line, which in this case measures 82 feet. Moat neighbors in the area are being
assessed about 90 feet.
Other issues expected to come up at the meeting are:
1. A new 6" water main is being installed along North Broadway Street and St.
Croix Street, as part of Phase 3 construction. Property owners along the west
side of Broadway and St. Croix have city water to the home but their services
come from First Street, either through the yards on First Street or under the
street of St. Croix or Stillwater Avenue.
Since none ofthese residents have ever paid for a water main assessment, an
assessment at this time is justifiable. The main will ultimately provide a proper
hook-up without being clouded by private easement sand potential disruption of
neighbor's p~vperty
2. On vacant or undeveloped parcels, there is no sanitary, water or street
assessment being charged. These parcels would have a $25,000 hook-up charge
imposed at the time the parcel is built on. There are a couple of parcels where
the property owner has delayed building because of the project and feel they
should charged the assessed rate rather than the hook-up charge.
.
(See attached letter) Although the Hankowitz letter points to what they view as
unfair change in the policy, to vary from our policy of not subsiding new
development would put in jeopardy the entire hook-up charge concept. There are
several other property owners who would certainly prefer to be served with a lower
assessment rather than the proposed hook-up fee
3~ Many residents may wender how long after the project is completed do the
property owners have to connect to the city water and sewer?
In past open houses, staffhas discussed past council actions such as the South Hill
Project, where owners had years before required hook-up. For this project early
hook-up is encouraged via our ordinance change that requires hook-up within
ninety days. Some property owners won't be happy with this new requirement, but
they can make an appeal to council
.
.
.
.
'.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council hold the assessment hearing and adopts the attached
assessment roll for the North Hill Sewer Project, as submitted.
ACTION REOUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should conduct the public
hearing and pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 2004- , RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR The NORTH HILL SEWER PROJECT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2000-15)
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
TIU.; NORTH IDLL PROJECT
(pROJECT 2001-11, L.I. 351)
.
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard
and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment North Hill Project for the following boarders.
State Hwy 96 to the North, St. Croix River to the East, Moore Street to the South and
County Road 5 to the West; and the area East of First Street North from Elm Street to
East Sycamore Street; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessments, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of
land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of
the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twelve (12)
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2005, and
shall bear interest at the rate of 4.3 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this
assessment r~solutions: To t~e first installment shall be added interest ~n the entire assessment fr.
the date of thIS resolutIon untIl December 31, 2004. To each subsequent Installment when due slial
added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. Property owners may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the
entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of
Stillwater Treasurer. NO INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED IF Ttlli El'\iTu<E ASSESSMENT IS
PAID BY NOVEMBER 15, 2004. If the assessment is not paid by November 15, 2004, accrued
interest from the date of the adoption of the assessment roll through December 31, 2004 will be added
with the first installment due in 2005. If payment is not received by November 15, 2004, the amount
listed above will be collected over a 12-year period with interest added at 4.3 % per year on the
unpaid balance. The yearly installments will be collected with the property taxes that are paid to
Washington County. At anytime thereafter, prior to November 15th of any year, pay the remaining
principal balance (in whole or part) to the City of Stillwater. .
4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be
extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in
the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 5th day of October 2004.
ATTEST:
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
.'
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
ASSEWNT RATE: 12 years NORTH .ROJECT ASSESS. RATE:
INTE 4.3% PROJ 000-15 Sanitary Sewer - , ge23/lot
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Watermain - $3,408.88/lot
Storm Sewer - $0.01/sf of contributing area
Street Reconstruction - $47.34/lf
TAX
PAYER
HOUSE STA SANITARY WATER STORM TOTAL ASSESS-
GEOCODE TAX PAYER NO TAX PAYER STREET CITY TE ZIP Property Address SEWER MAIN STREETS SEWER MENT
2103020110016 WOLF MARINE INC 514 ALDER ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 514 ALDER ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020130001 JOHNSON, KIRK A & TRUE DONA M 1818 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1818 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $0.00 $6,631.80 $100.19 $11.641.22
2103020130004 TESKE,P AUL & JULIE 1812 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1812 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $0.00 $0.00 $90.50 $4,999.73
2103020130005 TESKE,DONALD C 1806 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1806 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $0.00 $0.00 $136.00 $5,045.23
2103020130006 TESKE,DONALD C 1806 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1802 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $98.00 $98.00
2103020130007 BUETTNER, JOHN M 308 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 308 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,410.64 $249.01 $11,977.76
2103020130009 SCHOENECKER,KA THERINE A & JOHN 301 WILLOw ST E STILL WATER MN 55082 301 WILLOW ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $50.34 $10,736.95
2103020130010 FERRELL,JUDlTH B 307 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 307 WILLOW ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $5034 $10.736.95
2103020130012 JOHNSON, DEBORAH 1824 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1824 N 1ST ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,879.1 I $75.45 $13,272.67
2103020130013 SCHOENECKER,JERRY, JOHN, & KATHERINE 11440 11 OTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1818 N 1ST ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,842.20 $131.00 $11,291.31
2103020130014 PLA TTNER,VERGIL R & BEVERLY J 1816 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1816 N 2ND ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $95.49 $95.49
2103020130015 SA THER,LEE C & BARBARA JEAN 1801 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1801 N 2ND ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $196.01 $196.01
2103020130016 SA THER,LEE C & BARBARA JEAN 1801 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1801 N2NDST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,158.10 $196.01 $14,672.22
2103020130017 PLA TTNER,VIRGIL R & BEVERLY 1816 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1816N2NDST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $150.99 $13,206.10
2103020130018 EDSTROM, RICHARD A & JULIE A 1013 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1817 N 2ND ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $67.45 $67.45
2103020130019 EDSTROM,RICHARD A & JULIE A 1013 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1817N2NDST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $83.56 $83.56
2103020130020 WENTE,MICHAEL A & GERMAIN,GARY 125 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 125 WILLOW ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $232.10 $17,076.81
2103020130021 HANKWITZ, KRISTIN & T FISCHER 1862 JULIET AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 115 WILLOW ST E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40.27 $40.27
2103020130022 PAULSON, DUANE & JULIE 104 POPLAR ST W STILL WATER MN 55082 104 POPLAR ST W $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $95.63 $95.63
2103020130023 PAULSON, DUANE & JULIE 104 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 104 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $8,526.60 $151.01 $16.995.72
2103020130024 PAULSON, DUANE & JULIE 104 POPLAR ST W STILL WATER MN 55082 105 POPLAR ST W $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $123.62 $123.62
2103020130025 PAULSON, DUANE & JULIE 105 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55083 104 POPLAR ST W $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $174.46 $174.46
2103020130026 HANKW1TZ, KRISTIN & T FISCHER 1862 JULIET AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 115 WILLOW ST E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.38 $200.38
2103020130027 SHALLER,DALE V & JENNIFER K 1819 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1819 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30201 $302.01
2103020130029 SHALLER,DALE V & JENNIFER K 1819 N 4TH ST STILL WATER MN 55082 1819 N 4TH ST $4,90ge23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $601.13 $17,445.84
2103020130030 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 101 HAZELSTE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.25 $75.25
2103020130031 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 101 HAZELST E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.33 $100.33
2103020130032 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I & KATHLEEN 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55083 1907 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $87.80 $87.80
2103020130033 SKAALEN, JON P. 1900 N 3RD ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1900 N 3RD ST $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $3,789.60 $268.69 $12,376.40
2103020130034 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I & KATHLEEN 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1907 N 4TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $195.50 $17,040.21
2103020130035 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I & KATHLEEN 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1907 N 4TH ST $OeOO $0.00 $0.00 $150.51 $150.51
2103020130036 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I & KATHLEEN 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55083 1907 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150.51 $150.51
2103020130038 KERSCHBAUM,JOHN & EBERTS,M 1924 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1924 N 1ST ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $7,200.24 $150.50 $15,668.85
2103020130039 SHERLOCK,ROBERT E & MICHELL L 1912 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1914 N 1ST ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.26 $75.26
2103020130040 SHERLOCK,ROBERT E & MICHELL L 1912 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1912 N 1ST ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,55V5 $75.26 $11,946.12
2103020130041 SCHWARTZ,JANE E 1908 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1908 N 1ST ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $75.25 $10,761.86
2103020130042 COLBURN,JOHN M. 224 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 224 WILLOW ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,879.11 $75.25 $13,272.47
2103020130043 SCHWARTZ,JANE E 1908 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1905 N 2ND ST $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.25 $75.25
2103020130044 . ROACH,KOLEEN M 1901 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1901 N 2ND ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,879.11 $75.25 $13,272.47
2103020130045 LENTZ,JON W 1915 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1915 N 2ND ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $151.71 $13,206.82
2103020130046 ROSE, ALAN G & NOORJEHAN 1917 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1917N2NDST $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $7,200.24 $149.30 $15,667.65
2103020130052 O'LOUGHLlN,P A TRICK & MARGARET 300 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 300 WILLOW ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $7,200.24 $150.50 $15,668.85
2103020130053 LARSON,GERRI A 1911 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1911N1STST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $150eOO $13,205.11
ASS.NT RATE: 12 years NORTH .ROJECT ASSESS..- RATE:
INTE : 4.3% PROJ 000-15 Sanitary Sewer 9.23/1ot
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Watermain - $ A08.88/1ot
Storm Sewer - $Oe01/sf of contributing area
Street Reconstruction - $47.34/If
TAX
PAYER
HOUSE STA SANITARY WATER STORM TOTAL ASSESS-
GEOCODE TAXPAYER NO TAX PAYER STREET CITY TE ZIP Property Address SEWER MAIN STREETS SEWER MENT
2103020130055 TILKA,KEVIN M & GINA M HEATHERINGTON 1921 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1921 N 1ST ST $4,90ge23 $3,408.88 $7,200.24 $150e50 $15,668e85
2103020130056 DIETHERT,RALPH G&LORRAINE P . 2018 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 2018 BROADWAY STN $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $0.00 $0.00 $8,318.11
2103020130057 CASHMAN,JAMES P & MARILYN S 2022 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 2022 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,263.30 $0.00 $12,581.41
2103020130058 POHL, MARK A 2016 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 2016 BROADWAY STN $4,90ge23 $3,408.88 $OeOO $0.00 $8,318.11
2103020130088 BRIGGS, LEON & GULLICKSON, J J 324 HAZEL ST E STILL WATER MN 55082 324 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,215c93 $0.00 $12,534.04
2103020130062 WITTE,RICHARD F 304 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 304 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,90nO $69.24 $13,290eI5
2103020130063 CLEMENS,DA VID J 306 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 306 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,84220 $0.00 $11,160.31
2103020130064 WOLF,KIM ELIZABETH 305 ALDER ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 305 ALDER ST E $4,90923 $3,408e88 $2,842.20 $0.00 $11,16031
2103020130067 BRUCHU,RONALD P 222 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 222 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $7,105.50 $257eOO $15,680.61
2103020130070 GREEN, NANCY M 2012 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 2012 N 2ND ST $OeOO $0.00 $0.00 $75e25 $75.25
2103020130072 GREEN, NANCY M 2012 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 2012 N 2ND ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $7525 $10,761.86
2103020130073 GREEN, NANCY M 2012 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 2012 N 2ND ST $OeOO $0.00 $0.00 $7525 $7525
2103020130074 ZOLLER,MICHAEL S & PETERSON, KELLI JO 122 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 122 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $7,247.61 $150.50 $15,716.22
2103020130075 WICHELMANN,GARY A 110 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 110 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408c88 $4,926.48 $52.17 $13,296.76
2103020130076 PIDDE,DOUGLAS L & JENIFER A 2009 N 3RD ST STILLWATER MN 55082 2009 N 3RD ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $104.34 $10,790.95
2103020130080 KRAFTHEFER,JA Y B& CAROL N 2012 N 3RD ST STILLWATER MN 55082 2012 N 3RD ST $4,90923 $3,408e88 $3,789.60 $OeOO $12,107.71
2103020130084 KALMON,DANIEL J 309 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 309 WILLOW ST E $4,90923 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $75.33 $10,761.94
2103020130086 FERRELL,JUD1TH B 307 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 307 WILLOW ST E $0.00 $OeOO $OeOO $25.16 $25.16
2103020130087 SCHOENECKER,JOHN M & KATHERINE 301 WILLOW ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 301 WILLOW ST E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25.16 $25.16
210302014000 I JAROS, ROXANNE C LEE & KEVIN J 428 ALDER ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 428 ALDER ST E $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $7,105.50 $0.00 $15,423.61
2103020140005 PEARSON, SCOTT L & DEBORAH PO BOX 94 HALLOCK MN 56728 1921 BROADWAYSTN $4,90923 $4,879.11 $75.00 $9,863.34
2 I 03020 140006 GROTH,JEAN A 116 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 116 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $OeOO $5,542.29 $OeOO $10,451.52
2103020140007 MEYER,MICHAEL D & SHERYL A 118 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 118 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,737.00 $0.00 $9,646.23
2103020140008 MACDONALD, BRETT M & ELENA 11330 IRISH AVEN STILLWATER MN 55082 2021 LAKESTN $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $2,700e09 $0.00 $11,018.20
2103020140009 KERSCHBAUM,TONY J 2017 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2015LAKESTN $4,90923 $3,408.88 $3,268.53 $0.00 $11,586.64
2103020140010 RUMPF,LAWRENCE M & RUBY E 2009 LAKE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 2009 LAKE DR $4,909 e23 $0.00 $6,821.28 $0.00 $11,730.51
2103020140012 WINTERLIN,HAZEL 2023 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2023 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $4,879.11 $85.28 $13,282.50
2103020140013 ANDERSON, ELEANOR 2021 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2021 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $2,368.50 $85.28 $10,771.89
2103020140014 KERSCHBAUM,ANTHONY J 2017 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2017 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $85.28 $10,771.89 -
2103020140015 FOSTER,JUDY E 2011 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILL WATER MN 55082 2011 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,90923 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $8528 $10,771.89
2103020140016 O'BRIEN MILLER,BARBARA TRS 1055 OCEAN DR JUNO BEACH FL 33408 2007 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $85.28 $10,771.89
2103020140017 O'BRIEN MILLER,BARBARA TRS 1055 OCEAN DR JUNO BEACH FL 33408 2007 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $OeOO $OeOO $0.00 $8528 $8528
2103020140018 SPENCER, KENNETH & STACEY 410 HAZEL ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 410 HAZEL ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,87ge 11 $75.25 $13,272.47
2103020140019 ISERMAN,LEROY G &LORI J 2012 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2012 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,90923 $3,408e88 $4,737.00 $67.75 $13,122.86
2103020140020 JANTO,DANIEL P & ROBINSON, TANGELA D 2007 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 2007 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $0.00 $0.00 $8,3 I 8.11
2103020140021 ENGSTROM, ALICIA M & TAD 2017 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 2017 BROADWAY STN $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,55V5 $0.00 $11,870.86
2103020140022 HANNAHAN,MARK 206 ELM ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 2021 BROADWAY ST N $4,90923 $3,408.88 $3,552.75 $0.00 $11,870.86
2103020140024 NEEDHAM,P A TRICK & BARBARA J 124 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 124 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,168.56 $0.00 $9,077. 79
2103020140025 SATERBAK,ANDREA M 122 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 122 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,168.56 $0.00 $9,077.79
2103020140026 ROUSSEAU,ALAN 0 &PATRICIA M 120 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 120 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $OeOO $4,168.56 $0.00 $9,07V9
2103020140028 STRATTE,DEANNE JEAN 114 LAKESIDE DR STILL WATER MN 55082 114 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $3,789.60 $0.00 $8,698.83
2103020140029 EHLERS,BRUCE F 110 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 110 LAKESIDE DR $0.00 $OeOO $0.00 $30.49 $30.49
2103020140031 EHLERS,BRUCE F 110 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 110 LAKESIDE DR $4,90923 $0.00 $3,789.60 $56.63 $8,755.46
ASSES.T RATE: 12 years NORTH .ROJECT ASSESS.RATE:
INTER 4.3% PROJ 000-15 Sanitary Sewer -$ .23/lot
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Watermain - $3,408e88/lot
Storm Sewer - $Oe01/sf of contributing area
Street Reconstruction - $47.34/lf
TAX
PAYER
HOUSE STA SANITARY WATER STORM TOTAL ASSESS-
GEOCODE TAX PAYER NO TAX PAYER STREET CITY TE ZIP Property Address SEWER MAIN STREETS SEWER MENT
2103020140032 STOCKTON,SCOTI L 108 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 108 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $7,626.57 $126.32 $12,662.12
2103020140033 BERGUM, MICHAEL 106 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 106 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,263.30 $112.79 $9,285.32
2103020140034 JOHNSON,JODY A 104 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 104 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,263.30 $134.83 $9,307.36
2103020140035 FEDOR, VINCENT & DEBRA J 102 LAKESIDE DR STILL WATER MN 55082 102 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,263.30 $135.00 $9,307.53
2103020140036 SW ANSON,MICHELLE M & RICHARD C 101 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 101 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $6,442.32 $122.40 $11,473.95
2103020140037 SWENSON,JON R & JULENE K 103 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 103 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,263.30 $122.40 $9,294.93
2103020140038 SMITH,MARK H 105 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 105 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $4,263.30 $122.40 $9,294.93
2103020140039 WE1SS,IV AN R & COLLEEN L 107 LAKESIDE DR STILLWATER MN 55082 107 LAKESIDE DR $4,909.23 $0.00 $6,442.32 $132.68 $11,484.23
2103020140045 ANDERSON,ROBERT A & CLARICE 1920 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1920 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,126.42 $0.00 $11,444.53
2103020140050 DESTENO-CHALLEEN, DANIEL & DEBORAH A. 2103 SCHULENBERG ALLEY STILLWATER MN 55082 2103 SCHULENBERG ALLE' $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,063.36 $21.99 $14,403.46
2103020230004 SANDEEN,MARY ANN 715 VICTORIA CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1902 WILLIAM ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020230005 STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB 1421 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 400 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $1,406.98 $18,251.69
2103020240002 BOYNTON,WILLIAM S 225 HAZEL ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 225 HAZEL ST W $4,90923 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020240003 ST ARK, DANIEL H & LYNNE E 203 HAZEL ST W STILL WATER MN 55082 203 HAZEL ST W $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020240004 MEIER,JAMES D & MARILYN C 405 HAZEL ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 405 HAZEL ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020240005 P AUKERT,RICHARD E &JULIANNE 303 HAZEL ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 303 HAZEL ST W $4,90923 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844e71
2103020240006 PURCELL,NANCY V & JAMES D 2001 HAZELCT STILLWATER MN 55082 2001 HAZELCT $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2103020240008 SLOGAR,ROBERT A & CAROLE A PO BOX 248 STILLWATER MN 55082 2012HAZELCT $4,90ge23 $3,408e88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
2 I 03020240009 LARSON,BRIAN R & SONJA M B 2008 HAZELCT STILLWATER MN 55082 2008 HAZEL CT $4,90923 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $0.00 $16,844.71
21030202400 I 0 HARYCKI-KEANE, KENNETH F & MARY 2004 HAZELCT STILLWATER MN 55082 2004 HAZEL CT $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $135.04 $16,979.75
21030202400 I 2 KROENING,FLORENCE M 1910 N 5TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1910 N 5TH ST $4,909,23 $3,408.88 $6,916.02 $248.01 $15,482.14
2103020240013 KIMKER,HERMAN F 1913 N 5TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1913 N 5TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,552.75 $225.00 $12,095.86
2103020240014 WHEELER,BRAD W 1902 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1902 N 4TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,552.75 $225.00 $12,095.86
2103020240015 SCULLY,TERRENCE J & BEVERLY 1901 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1901 N 4TH ST $4,909,23 $3,408.88 $7,105.50 $450.00 $15,873.61
2103020240016 JUNKER,SCOTT M PO BOX 727 STILLWATER MN 55082 1802 N 4TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $225.00 $17,069.71
2103020240017 BERTALMIO,LYNNE S 220 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 220 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,513.38 $127.50 $14,958.99
2103020240019 KRAMER,KAREN ANN 1904 N 5TH ST STILL WATER MN 55082 1904 N 5TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,537c06 $435eOO $15,290.17
2 I 03020240020 CLA VETTE,CLAUDE E & KATHLEEN F 1912 N 5TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1912 N 5TH ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $390.00 $17,234.71
2103020240021 HUGHES, CECILE R 312 WILLOW ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 312WILLOWSTW $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $5,447.55 $172.50 $13,938.16
2103020240022 CAMPBELL,MICHAEL E & SUSAN L 311 WILLOW ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 311 WILLOWSTW $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,789.60 $430.00 $12,537.71
2103020240025 CALLIES,RANDALL J & MARGARET A 500 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 500 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $652.50 $17,497.21
2 I 03020240027 BOUCHER,BR Y AN R & CARRIE M 317 HAZEL ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 317 HAZELSTW $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,973.85 $141.75 $13,433.71
2103020240028 KEY,MATIHEW J & MELODIE M 321 HAZEL ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 321 HAZEL ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $135.00 $13,190.11
2103020240029 BENSON,DOROTHY, RONALD & BARB FAHNHOR 206 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 206 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $150.00 $J3,205.ll
2103020240030 PETERSON,CRAIG T & NOREEN S 404 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 404 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,868.65 $217.50 $15,404.26
210302024003 J LEIFELD,CHARLES & MARY BETH 402 POPLAR ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 402 POPLAR ST W $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,868.65 $217.50 $15,404.26
2103020240032 ROETTGER,DA VID L & NANCY L PO BOX 171 STILLWATER MN 55082 318 POPLAR STW $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,868.65 $217.50 $15,404.26
2103020240033 ROETTGER,DA VID L & NANCY L POBOX 171 STILLWATER MN 55082 306 POPLAR ST W $0.00 $OeOO $0.00 $217.50 $217.50
2103020310001 STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB 1421 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1421 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,912.47 $15,912.47
2103020320001 STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB 1421 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55083 1421 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,412.85 $1,412.85
2103020410026 AIPLE,ELA YNE J 1513 MAIN ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1513 MAIN ST N $4,90923 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,909.23
2103020420001 STILLWATER COUNTRY CLUB 1421 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55083 1421 N 4TH ST $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,412.85 $1,4 I 2.85
2103020420017 DANAHER,PATRICIA A 1723 N 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1723 N 2ND ST $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,263.30 $596.77 $13,178.18
ASS.ENT RATE: 12 years NORT. PROJECT ASSES.T RATE:
INT : 4.3% PR 2000-15 Sanitary Sewe ,909.23/lot
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL Watermain - $3,408.88/lot
Storm Sewer - $O.01/sf of contributing area
Street Reconstruction - $47e34/lf
TAX
PAYER
HOUSE STA SANITARY WATER STORM TOTAL ASSESS-
GEOCODE TAXPAYER NO TAX PAYER STREET CITY TE ZIP Property Address SEWER MAIN STREETS SEWER MENT
2103020420019 KEISTER,STEVEN D & LYNN M PO BOX 469 STILLWATER MN 55082 In I N 2ND ST $4,90923 $3,408.88 $5,542.29 $113.26 $13,973.66
2103020420020 ACERS,TERENCE J 422 ELM ST W STILLWATER MN 55082 In2 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $OeOO $4,26330 $117.61 $9,290e 14
2103020420021 BALLER,JONATHAN T & YVONNE LEMBERGER 1710 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1710 BROADWAY STN $4,90n3 $3,408.88 $0.00 $0.00 $8,318.11
2103020420023 NELSON,A DWAYNE & JEANETTE 822 S 2ND ST STILLWATER MN 55082 305 POPLAR ST E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $5,684.40 $280eOO $14,282.51
2103020420026 KElSTER,STEVEN D & LYNN M PO BOX 469 STILLWATER MN 55082 Inl N 2ND ST $OeOO $0.00 $OeOO $25.00 $25.00
2103020430026 KOLLANDER,NORMAN A 1122 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1122 BROADWAY STN $OeOO $3,408.88 $7,200.24 $150.00 $10,759.12
2103020430027 JOHNSON,KEITH R & VICKY M 1116 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1116 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $75.00 $5,852.38
2103020430028 KNEATH,PHILLlP & KATHLEEN V 1110 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1110 BROADWAY STN $OeOO $3,408.88 $2,368.50 $75.00 $5,85238
2103020430029 DUCHENE, MARK 324 WILKIN ST E STILLWATER MN 55082 324 WILKINS ST E $0.00 $0.00 $6,063.36 $112.50 $6,175.86
2103020430030 BELlSLE,DA VID A 16559 20TH ST SO ST CROIX BEACI MN 55043 1I03NISTST $0.00 $0.00 $2,510.61 $75.00 $2,585.61
2103020430034 STEVENSEN,BRADLEY J & JODI L 1123 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1123NISTST $OeOO $0.00 $2,510.61 $15.00 $2,525.61
2103020430035 KLEIN, WILLIAM & JEAN 1220 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1220 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $3,408.88 $8,526.60 $225.00 $ I 2, 160.48
2103020430036 KNOWLTON,MARGERY L 1208 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1208 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $3,408e88 $3,552.75 $112.50 $7,074.13
2103020430037 FLUG,THOMAS W & JOELLE R 1204 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1204 BROADWAY STN $0.00 $3,408e88 $6,063.36 $112.50 $9,584.74
2103020430038 WALSH, SUSAN M 1203 N 1ST ST STILL WATER MN 55082 1203 N 1ST ST $0.00 $OeOO $2,510.61 $150.00 $2,660.61
2103020430042 JOHNSTON,WILLIS H & MILDRED E 1221 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1221 N 1ST ST $0.00 $0.00 $2,510e61 $69.00 $2,579.61
2103020430084 DORN,DAVID HAROLD 1322 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1322 BROADWAY STN $4,90n3 $3,408.88 $3,78ge60 $120.00 $12,22UI
2103020430085 GERST,STEVEN G & ALEXANDRA H 1320 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1320 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,737.00 $150.00 $13,205.11
2103020430086 MILLER,JOHN H & JOHNSON LEANNE 1312 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1312 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $4,26330 $750.00 $13,331.41
2103020430087 CHRISTOFFERSEN,RONALD F & DO 324 ST CROIX AVE E STILLWATER MN 55082 324 ST CROIX AVE E $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $6,560.75 $110.00 $14,988.86
2103020430088 MILLER,JOHN H & JOHNSON LEANNE 1312 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1312 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40.00 $40.00
2103020430089 EWING, MILDRED L 1305 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1305 N 1ST ST $0.00 $0.00 $2,510e61 $150eOO $2,660.61
2103020430097 SCHULTZ,JEAN M 1023 N 1ST ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1023 N 1ST ST $OeOO $0.00 $2,5 I 0.61 $0.00 $2,510.61
2103020440003 MIDDLETON,GEORGE I 1907 N 4TH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 1221 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $8,526.60 $OeOO $16,844.71
2 I 030204400 1 0 STEINMETZ,RUTH H I I 17 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1117 BROADWAY STN $4,90n3 $3,408.88 $8,526e60 $0.00 $16,8401
2 I 030204400 14 HAAPLA, JEANNE A & WALSH, NANCY 1307 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1307 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408.88 $3,552.75 $0.00 $11,870.86
2 I 030204400 15 GEISNESS,MARVIN P & LAWN AVE ST PAUL MN 55105 1317 BROADWAY ST N $4,909.23 $3,408e88 $7,105.50 $0.00 $15,423.61
2103020440016 ROETTGER,GERALD W 1401 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1401 BROADWAY STN $4,90923 $3,408.88 $2,84220 $OeOO $11,160.31
2803020110008 THOMSEN,THOMAS C & SUZANNE W 913 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 913 BROADWAY STN $4,90923 $3,408.88 $2,842.20 $0.00 $11,160.31
2803020120025 GIPSON,GAR Y EUGENE & PATRICIA 1020 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1020 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $OeOO $7,247e61 $150eOO $7,397.61
2803020120026 P ALMER,BR Y AN L & KATHERINE L 1012 BROADWAY ST N STlLLA TER MN 55082 1012 BROADWAY STN $0.00 $OeOO $4,737eOO $0.00 $4,737.00
2803020120027 PALMER, KATHERINE LU 1008 BROADWAY ST N STILLWATER MN 55082 1008 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $0.00 $3,789.60 $0.00 $3,789.60
2803020120058 LAPPI,PAULETTE M STILLWATER MN 55082 900 BROADWAY ST N $0.00 $3,408e88 $3,789.60 $0.00 $7,198.48
.
.
.
Thomas and Joelle Flug
1204 N. Broadway
Stillwater, MN 55082
October 5, 2004
Honorable Mayor Jay Kimble and City Council:
I am writing to address the latest special tax assessment that is currently underway in the North
Hill Neighborhood (Project 2000-15, L.I.350) of Stillwater. Attached you will find a unanimous
neighborhood petition opposing the water main assessment of $3,408.88/househo]d.
This letter seeks to clarifY our opposition to this gratuitous, expensive and non-strategic action by
the City of Stillwater. Residents of our neighborhood are in favor of road and curb assessments
because the results have direct safety, aesthetic and financial benefit to our properties. In
contrast, the water main assessment is simple idiocy; we are all currently hooked-up to City
water! The latest move by the City is essentially a double tax or double assessment on a
neighborhood that does not need additional taxation or assessment!
My family is currently satisfied with our current City water hookup, which has no variances and
has not created any problems for our households. The sum of the money the City is charging us
for duplicate service could be better spent investing in my newborn daughter's education or
family healthcare. This would remain true for any new young family. In the case of many of my
neighbors, money would be better served saving for the rising costs of long-term care, retirement
and prescription drugs. Any situation that you look at; families or individuals that have existing
service, have more important finical obligations then to fund a water main that we will not hook
to.
We certainly understand and agree that government needs to provide services for the good of the
community. However, this latest action will cause significant financial difficulties for the young,
growing and e]derly families which have not budgeted for this duplication of water services. I
should say that this latest move by the City is actually a disservice and is the main thrust for this
neighborhood campaign. Good loca] government should also strive to be the most efficient, smart
and responsive it can be and not waste tax payer dollars or goodwill on senseless initiates.
It is my sincerest hope that the Honorable Mayor Jay Kimble and City Council will consider this
neighborhood opinion and work to find a reasonable solution. In short, we are asking the City of
Stillwater to remove the special water main assessment immediately. If there is a need for this
water main for the purpose of future development, perhaps the City should accommodate this cost
in its budget instead of sticking it to long-term residents of North Hill. Please take a close look at
your important role as a member of the City Council; place your family in my shoes and
understand why I do not want to be assessed for service I currently have.
Sincerely,
- --/~'#-
....---.-..-
Thomas W. Flug
. To be presented at the City Council Meeting October 5, 2004
In response to the special assessment for North Hill Improvements
(Project 2000-15, L.1.350)
.
.
Residents located on the block of Broadway Street North, which
already have city water service, oppose the Watermain assessment
of $3,408.88. This assessment does not bring value to our property
since we already have service.
Name
;tJo v- h<. a I'\-
t(o Ll ;:h"- ~
Signature
%~t
Address
L /;;'2 LtJ,B"/o"dJwa./
. (
--T(orMs.. t10dle ~ Jd04 I'll. ~I' 14tOvv/hr
pfl/i'J,,"/1 f M W Hbl. J ;2LJ?f .;1/ ~1YJ<:i cI uJ 0. J
J../~~() ,().B~~~
(/1iiiiJ / / ( / d If': g~, 11'4--1./
k/;d jI.J~~ //(f- IV'. ~5r:-
W~ (-~A1A.. K~ /). ;,Jo N. f3(M~
'--
.
.
.
Norman Kollander
1122 North Broadway
Stillwater, MN 55082
September 28, 2004
Mayor and City Council
City Of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
I will not be in attendance for the October 5, 2004 City Council Meeting. I am writing this letter to
express my concern over the North Hill Project assessment letter I received. I have lived in my
home for my entire life and have seen many changes in this town. Most recentIy,new development
in the downtown area and new city services for the North Hill residence. I agree that improved
street conditions in my neighborhood would benefit my property; however I do not understand the
assessment for a new city water main. The power company does not charge me for their lines; I
simply pay for the service that I use. Much like the power company, I have paid my city water bills
since the service was installed. It begs the question; Why would I pay for a new water main that I
will not hook to? Charging me for a water main that I do not need, puts a tremendous burden on
my property and for the first time has me exploring the options for moving.
I hope that you will seriously consider the impact of this assessment on property owners which
already have city water and remove the water main assessment.
Sincerely,
Norman Kollander
1(~ %2--L~
.
.
.
October 5,2004
Parcel Number: 2103020130041 located at 1908 North First Street
Assessment total: $10, 761.86
Please consider this objection to the assessment. I will be facing considerable cost to
repair my driveway because of the improvements. I have attached copies of the driveway
repair/replacement estimates. I am aware that the city has reviewed my driveway and
feel that it is fme because there are other driveways in Stillwater that have a similar
grade. My argument is that my driveway had al't'lvximately a 2% grade at the beginning
of the project, now it is approximately 7%. I am concerned that this will create a
dangerous walkway during the winter months. I feel that the burden of resolving this
liability has been left as my responsibility.
Sincerely,
A.'C.T.- ASPHALT SPECIALTIES COVlPANY
~
~
. ~h((~
--D HOME PHONE
G?S-(~ ~- 3Cur7 ~2-~Y' b~'fi
~ APPOINTMENT LEAD SOURCE DATE SOLD
~ :,~~~ EST~T~
WORKSHEET
ISTLMPS 0
ROOTS 0
S INKLlt\G SYSTEM 0
PHCNE WIRES 0
ELECTRIC WIRES 0
CABLE 0
WATER SHUT OFF 0
DRAINAGE PROOLEMS 0
GRADE CI-iAJ'K3E 0
HEAVING 0
OVERHEAD UNES 0
TREE LIMBS 0
ROCf OVERHANG 0
CHAIN SAW 0
Bl<XK REPAIR 0
tIK) YES
NAME -c-::
~~t;
ADDRESS
lGfc>~ \ V
CITY
S--k\.ol4..c. ~
$-\
tJ.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
HOUSE
PROPERTY LINE DISTANCE
ORQE
ZIP
MN
-ss-caa
CROSS STREET
CALL GOPHER
TIME
WORK PHONE
LEAD #
MAP CO-DO
)2J EXCAVATE tIK) YES
&
BASE REPlACE AS IS 0 0
tc U> ~
EIB '~\ FLARES 0 0
~~b .
E!@ TYPE OF REMOVAL
JACK ~t~ AC GRASS GRAVEL
HAMMER@
EXTRA CONCRETE OTHER
. TRUCKS OUT ~!.. ,
SCHEDULER: PG SIP 0
SAW CUT ~t 4--:..
EXTRA TRK
LOADS IN
---_...J._, ........ .
JZf
REPLACE
WITH
SIDEWALK
.\ ,
RAt\:s ;.,
.~, ~€ . ~,&(~ c." ~
@
EXP
'e,J&.,~ t& : €"(~~J : ~../~
. . . . . p4-~
. ~:~..
) ~ l' .-.
./.
~~~.
NC
SEALCOA T
CON c::..~f;>
SEALS
. COMMITTED TO EXCELLENCE
Fqc o..u \v A.~ ~ L.ItV- R<<-~.&c-<!- I~ ~S c::::'-\_~oJ. ~
,
R~....J~c! C\._~ Q4""A<~.! ~.r P/C!>f?--- H~ ":J, Vi- ~
8/03 PG 2 OF 2
Wausau As) la ..
6995 170th Street North
Hugo, MN 55038
Office: (651) 257-8075
Name ~CU'Ye/ SrhVVil-d-L
Addresc: l ~ () ~ f\\J) y- t h \ ~ s+,
cityShUIAlO.lo y mlJ Phonp 051- 460 - 'bQ9? ~
(f) 12-- 9i 0()) - r;, '50 Lf
TERMS: (Cash or check upon job completion)
RIGHT TO CANCEL: You, the Buyer, may cancel this transaction at
any time prior to midnight of the third business day after the date
of this transaction without any penalty or obligation. To cancel,
mail or deliver, a signed and dated notice to Wausau Asphalt. 6%
addition if not paid within 30 days.
.
4070
DIRECTIONS TO JOB SITE:
Price Includes: Fine Grading, Granite (if needed), Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt.
@ YPtf-P t1'vf
~ Jf61rz#~ e
i . /. / /~I- /H/Y' /15?h/Jc/J:.
'"2 II /7 ;:> ~j4s:f f'7'" /'.
c/ LoMr 'j:J
.",,:JJ'
o ~e-G
~
tJUb,
/,70/.~
THIS ESTIMATE
EXPIRES ON
-,
/ / tJ .; lStp
(\Ie')
COC\l
"- J'ooCO
.....0)
I}... . *cb
~ 0 0.,,-
c: -C\I
<5--
I x.....
'() ... adS
~ +oJ z-
ca .!!
f :c
::J ..c: 0
"- ro a. :e
~
en en 10
~ ::J <( "
0
ro <0
'.,,-
ts "C\I
lOCO
(\10)
- .
~ u;~
~ !e.C\I
..-
Z afiB
~-:-:
II)
........ ~=
'- .- .g
~ 5:e
We p~ he~ to fumjsh rpaterial and labor-complete i~c9-ordance with above_~,ecifications, for the sum o.k,
/~ -r?- - ~ ~/~.~ ~/~e--' ,:;._ ..-e~Do"ars($33~t?- ).
.. /
. TERMS:,. CJ\SH OR ~ECK UPON JOB COMSLETION
Estimated By: ~ ~ ~ Date d' - /CJ -dY
Pj:/
Accepted By:
Date
Quotation
/
.7...~1 L Y" CONCRI:: n:/ BLACluvPPlNG & LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
CQmpanies 421 9th Avenue South. 51. Paul Park. MN 55071
TO: Jane Schwartz
1908 No 1st Street, Stillwater, Mn 55082
DATE: lo-Aug-2004
RE: Driveway Recov.""b....Gvtl
Phone: 651.430.3983
FAX:
ianeeschwartzlWaolecom
We would propose the
1) Remove and replace 42' of 8612 Cv......dc Curb
2) Remove ~l>ng asphalt.
3) R~ e..k and place upto 6" of Oass 5 Base to maintain 2% Grade to east.
4) Place 3ft lift of Type 418 Asphalt.
I U J Al INsrAllED PRICE
$4,190.00
.
Gary OSter
PI'eSideIIl
PRE-UEN P ""...",! to Minnesota Statutes S __,',.:" 514.011. C",J...,,_}or h.. l.;; notifies 0 '''' ., of the IOJ}" '''''...
NOTICE ANY ..~N OR COMPANY SUPPLYING lABOR OR .......;.:.....ALS FOR ntlS
IMPROVEMENT 10 YOUR PRO.. 0:.0... " MAY FIl.E A LIEN AGAINST YOUR.
PROi Ln. .. If llIAT PERSON OR COMPANY 15 NOT PAm FOR THE...., hl'';;t., I I.; .""s.
UNDER MlNNESaTA LAW, YOU HAVE THE RIGKTlO PAY PERSONS WHO SUPPUED
LABOR OR MA.c.uAlS FOR THE D ,,: .,,' JEJ-! 0, ", ..'".....:::.....Y AND DEDUCT11tI5
AMOUNT FROM THE CONlRACTPRI~ OR WITHHOl.D THE AMOUNTS DUE 11tEM
FROM us UNTD..12O DAYS Ar lEft. COMPl.E1lON OF THE IMPROVEMENT UNLESS WE
GIVE YOU A LIEN WAIVER SIGNED BY..~ WHO SUPPUED ANY LABOR OR
MAn3uALFORTHE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO GAVE YOU 11MELY ....'."..:.:.
;From the desk of... .-
~Richard Kelly
;YICe President
The Daily Companies
421 - 9th Ave. So.
St Paul Park, MN 55071
, (651) 45~22
(651) 459-6817 FAX
: EmaiI: ~@uslink.net
.
Accepted By Owner I Buyer
Date
/~ ..>,\ /-,,~
~>
~ -:---:' :.i!I!
.pavement Texturing. s;andard Paving
Proposal
;Al,~O 8
/7
SPHALT
SSOCIATES INC.
Date
'~ Tradition Of Excellence Since 1987"
Licensed and Insured. Member Better Business Bureau
Box 25203, Woodbury, MN 55125
Phone: (651) 735-5454 · 800-439-3881
FAX (715) 749-3310
Customer Name '- laaP- 9/w/drl?
Address --L91Jf' A.I ISI <Sf
city9,ilt'k#,,' Stat~ Zip .~~()R2-
PhOn~) f/go ::5ffJ (W)
Cell C11J' .gt;P.6~ Fax
Development
--
ll{
, - '.
k--....--...:..--
....,........ \.--.!
...n.n...f..........
; ~
........................
;~:~n>j~~~+il
~r:}lr:le$tdrt44-
h_;:.h.U_....t._..._......~......
......J..........
. . . .
, , ' . . .
." '. ." ,
, .: :;: : :: .:
.. ..:n... ......~.._._.. ....~:......... ..1.... ,.. u. ..:;... _... ... .:~..n... ..>... ....h' .~. .u.....
. . .
....................-............,..........
........}........._.~............~...........t............~..........~....h......J...........i..n.......
. ,
"..'.,.h,_~.,...'..N..,....
. .
..... .,,~. "'....,'''...f'.....--..-- '.' ~_.._".._. -.,. -+. '"....^'.,.,~.~.....^....^.t.N'.'~
, ,
o Contact Person:
o Cell Phone #:
o Job#
Client #
All exposed edges are finished at a 45' angle.
01. 912 ft'"sqe ft. ~qe yd.
~2. Stake out and string line all straight edges.
o 3. Hand cut grass edges, where needed.
o 4. Saw cut
iPs. Detennine grade
06e Import 21-
establish L/~
all cuts fonn straight, vertical joint line.
tons of crushed rock base as need to
. basee
~ Shape for drainage, wet base, compact sUbgrade to unifonn density.
/J). f!: JJWd tons of hot-mixed asphalt pavement consisting
of 5-7 percent cement approximately
machine rolled to 3/f @cted)
"loose
o Type 2341 A (112" modified)
o Type 2341 Wear (314")
o 9. Street Print Pavement texturing
Street print is a unique hybrid bituminous pavement concrete which
is textured and coated with a cement base color coating system.
~Oe All projects requiring excavation will have a locate verified by
(C/ "Diggers Hotline" prior to the start of said excavation. Locates wUI
be called in by AAt
Noel
-I/lyfC {u~
12. Oth9/:
1JIi).
,
r I
I ~-qSlXl qv
l,
All of the above work to be completed in substantial and workmanlike manner for the total of $
Terms: ?~ down, remainder .J:i..J/ .~f due upon comp':tion of job.
Any unpaid balance will accrue at 1.5% per month. Good for
days.
Asphalt Associates, Inc. agrees to carry Workman's Compensation and Public Liability Insurance, also to pay all Sales Taxes, upon the material fumished under this ~.,~....I.as
required by the United States Government and the State in which the work is performede Asphalt Associates, Inc. agrees to complete the above outlined work in a workmanlike mannel
in accordance to standard construction practices. All agreements are contingent upon delays beyond the control of Asphalt Associates, Inc. Asphalt Associates, Ince has the right to
refuse to accept any proposat
.e read the contract terms and conditions on the back side of this proposat By signing this proposal, I acknowledge agreem to all of the stated contract terms and conclitionse
Signature of Owner Date . a Jractor ~W
'The bitterness of poor quality remains..Jong after the sweetness of low p ce is forgotten."
Please ~~~ and RJtum to accept this proposal
.
.
.
City Administrator
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
October 04, 2004
Re: Proposed Assessment for North Hill hnprovements Parcel No. 2103020430035
As the owners of the above parcel located At 1220 Broadway Street North we object to
portion of the proposed assessment for North Hill improvements. (Project 200-15,
L.I.350)
In the explanation of costs mailed to us there is $3,408.88 in costs for W atermain. We
purchased this house in August of 2003 and the house is connected to the city of
Stillwater water service. It is unfair and improper to charge us an assessment for a water
main that does not improve my property. I object to the watermain cost of $3,408.88 and
appeal for a re-consideration of my special assessment.
,
651-351-2770
.
.
.
Duane & Julie Paulson
104 Poplar St E.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Oct. 3, 2004
To the Stillwater City Council:
Please accept this notice as a fonnal objection to the assessment to our property:
104 Poplar St E
Parcel #2103020130022 - 25
We have several reasons for objecting to our $17)87 in assessments:
I. The Council has decided to NOT charge for vacant parcels. We have a vacant parcel on
the southeast comer of our lot (It has been stubbed-in for a water main) for which we
have been charged (see illustration). Assuming that that lot takes up all of 2nd street and
110 feet of Poplar, our total frontage would be 137.3 feet Street assessment, then, would
be $6,503.90, vSe the $8,526e60 we are currently being assessed.
2. Hooking up to sewer and water will be unusally expensive for our property for these
reasons: 1) We have no basement, 2) We have an exceptionally expensive aggregate front
stairway, meaning we will not be able to take the most direct route to our hookups, and 3)
Our water and sewer systems are set back approximately 150 feet from the streete We
estimate it will cost roughly $20,000 to hook up the services, including various hook-up
fees.
3. Our septic system was completely replaced in 1999 at a cost of roughly $20,000e For this
reason, we should pay less for sewer than residents who have older septic systems or,
most importantly, no septic at all (vacant properties)e Since the assessment must be
uniform upon the same class of property, and it is doubtful that other residents have such
an updated septic system, we propose a 50% reduction in our sewer assessment ($2,454)e
4e The city's aWJ<liser suggests our property value will increase $40,000 by virtue of the
"improvementse" As we bought the house only one year ago, we can tell you definitively
that we would not have paid anywhere near that amount for city services and pretty curbse
In fact, none of these features are even mentioned in property-comparisons perfonned by
ap}.l1<lisers, including the city's OWlle While industry-standard dollar amounts are allocated
to some items such as fireplaces, age of house, view and living area, there is no mention
of the "value" of public sewer, public water, curbs, and smoother streeK
In summary, given the original assement of$17)87, and the additional $20,000 it will take to
install the new services, we would require an increase in property value of more than $37,000,
which is unreasonable for this ragged, single-story 1950 house. We believe the improvements
will enhance the value of our property by $10,000-$20,000 maximum
For all ofthese reasons, we are asking for a reduction of $7,000, for a total assessment of
$10,387.
Thank you for your consideratioR
~p~
Julie Paulson
651-275-9544
~Ll()';~ r~~~
Duane Paulson
.
104 Poplar St E.
Julie and Duane Paulson
i-
\~.,
"
I
~'~C"5393
34.09 / I'
100.3 7 . --
-
158
~-
"
\ VlNoI/ ;: W -
to- U
< 0
150) 150-1 U 0
---I - <
VACmn 60 Wl~W . \ " ;>
_ DOC 12577~_ 1 _ \
158 7150
,.,
y ~ ~ ~
I (0029) 1 ~ ~ ! (~) ~
\ J:2V" ~
-1------j -:
~ 5 4~ 2 ; 8 ;
..,., ~,If
-1- 1~~I- - -1- ~ "I
, " ~ Ie"
3 ~;> 19
~ ~.
- r 158
DOC 586654
- I-
. - 150 7'.:. -~
to
g
"
U)
~
4
..:;'~ ~
1 ~ J
~ (0020) :c
.. ....
- -I- ~
ec>- lID -. Z
8
ISO
i8 ;-.
Additional
property
'> which should
not be
assessed
~~
,
o WEST
to
POPlAR S1REET
\
v
----
I --
1373 feet
.
.
.
.
Bruce F. Ehlers
612-382-9382
110 Lakeside Drive
Stillwater, MN 55082
bruce@pconline.com - E-Mail
September 27, 2004
City Clerk
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Street Assessment at 110 Lakeside Drive - Parcel # 2103020140031
Dear City Clerk,
Please accept this letter as my formal objection to the current street assessment of $3,789.63
to my property referenced above as delineated in my assessment letterlinvoice of September
17, 2004e
Based on the numbers and information contained in Mr. Sanders letter dated the same, the
street assessment is per lineal foot of frontage and at a rate of $47.37 per lineal foot. My
property has 57 lineal feet of street frontage and should be assessed at 57 times $47.37 or
for an assessment of $2,700e09 (57 x 47.37 = 2,700.09). The current letter sent to me
assesses the same frontage at $3,78ge63 which is $1,089.51 too high based on your above
referenced letters and rates per lineal foot.
Please send me a corrected assessment letter (invoice) reflecting the accurate street
assessment of $2,700.09 for my property referenced above.
3:'/~
Bruce F. Ehlers
.
.
.
20 September, 2004
RE: North Hill Sewer and Water Proposed Assessment
Parcel No.: 2103020130021/26
Location: 115 Willow Street E.
Property Owners: Terry Fisher and Kristin Hankwitz
Please accept this letter in objection to the proposed $25,000 sewer/water hook-up fee
placed on our undeveloped lot (see parcel numbers above). Prior to purchasing said
property, our realtor received written confirmation of our fixed assessment, written and
signed by Shawn Sanders on February 11, 2004 (COPY ENCLOSED). With this
confirmation, along with a letter from Steve Russell assuring us of the lot's buildability
and lack of restrictions (COPY ENCLOSED), we purchased the lot with the intent to
build a home following the completion of the city's phase 3 improvement project. To
date, we have provided the city with a property survey (given to Klayton Eckles by
myself at the phase 3 city council meeting on August 10,2004), and a site plan map
(sent 9-04 by Gar Hargens (architect) to Tim Moore to aid in sewer and water stub
placement-COPY ENCLOSED). Our architect is currently in the process of refining
the designs for our home, and we plan to begin construction next spring/summer.
Upon receiving the anticipated assessment invoices (COPIES ENCLOSED), and after
making phone calls to Shawn Sanders, Tim Moore, and Klayton Eckles, we were
shocked to learn that there would be no sanitary sewer, water, or street costs (which
were to be "$11,160.31 or lower" according to Mr. Sanders' 2-04 letter), but instead
would be billed $25,000 at the time of hook-up. We understand the reasoning behind
the city's decision to imposed the $25,000 hook-up charge to properties that may be
developed in the future. However, we believe that given the information we were
provided by the city prior to the purchase of our lot, and that plans for our property are
currently under development, our circumstances are exceptional. For these reasons,
we should be exempt from the $25,000 hook-up charge, and the proposed assessment
presented by Shawn Sanders should remain valid.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to hearing from you and
resolving this matter.
copies:
City Clerk
Klayton Eckles.
Steve Russell
.
.
.l'~'water
} .~
- .~..-:;
-- ~~
THE IIUHPLACE Of allNNHOTA J
February 11) 2004
RE: Willow Street Proposed Assessment
Dear Julie:
The plv,posed assessment for the property on Willow Street GeoCode # 2103020130026
is as follows:
The sewer and water amounts are fixed and should not change. The street amount is
estimated on the high side and possibly lowered. should you haVe any questions, please
give me a call at 430-8835.
t
Sincerely,
)khL'
'.
\.
l'i,.'
.! ,.../
Shawn Sanders, PE
Assistant City Engineer
;.-
,
i
Tn -;:Jt:\\-LJ
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNE~pTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
i/ -
H31~MIII1S ~o ^lI~" :91 P000/11/60
.
.
.
82/12/2884 15:58
FEB-11-2004 15:54
5514388818
CITY OF STILLWATER
COLDWELL BANKER BURNET
t-'Abt. tH
P.02
5516989356
unti1:led
1ZJ~ t/:c~~
t; 1'1'-9 PH
Letter to Steve Russell, city of stillwater communi~y oe~elopemeryt oir~c~~r
FAbru~ry 11, 2004 From Julee venaglia, Realtor Repre~en~lng Terrl & Krlstln
Hankw'ltz.
~eguarding property XXX willow Road, Lega11y described as: Lot 6 Block 44,
CARLI & SCHULENBERG"S ADDITION... (+ Long legal) prD# 2103020130026
Buyers are free to build a home on said property.
said proper~y is not part of a Historical D1s~rict.
said property has been deemed a developable site.
There are no s~yle restrictions as to ~he buildin9 of a home on said
property with the excep~ion of abiding by the zon,n9 laws of Stillwater.
comments:
J/t7 (jUu(lM"7 r ~ ~
~r1/{{cfu( h -14 ~ ~ ~
Cr tVV( ~
This
InformatiO~ correct to ~he best of my knowledge.
~ I~ . Z-/f7-/0 Y
~
s~eve Russell, Commun1ty Developemen~ Director
page 1
-?
.
IF COUNCIL ADOPTS
THE ASSESSMENTS,
THIS WILL BE
YOUR INVOICE
FOR THE PROJECT
,. 1-. water
~ )_.
~. ::;:;.---~ ~
~ -~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSEDASSESSMENT
FOR NORTH HILL IMPROVEMENTS
(PROJECT 2000-15, L.I. 350)
September 17, 2004
HANKWITZ, KRISTIN & T FISCHER
1862 JULIET AVE
ST PAUL, MN 55105
Notice is hereby given that the council will meet at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, October 5,2004
in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 216 N. 4th Street to adopt the proposed assessmept for Project No.
2000-15, L.I. 350. The improvement consists of reconstruction of streets, curb and gutter, water main, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer improvements. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements in the North
Hill area include properties in the following borders:
State Hwy 96 to the North, St. Croix River to the East, Moore Street to the South and County
Road 5 to the West;: and the area East of First Street North from Elm Street to EastSycamoreStreet
. Your Parcel is described'as follows: Parcel Numbe~ 2~03~20130021, located ~t 115 WIL~OW ST E.
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is $40.27.
The following is an explanation of costs.
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Streets
Storm Sewer
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$40.27
NO INTEREST WILLBE CHARGED IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID BYNOVEMBER 15,
2004. Ifthe assessment is not paid by November 15, 2004, accrued interestfrofu the dateofthe adoption ofthe
assessment roll through December 31, 2005 will be added \viththe first installtrient due in 2005. Ifpayment is
not received by November 15, 2004, the amount listed above will be col1ectedovera 12-yearperiod with
interest added at 4.3% per year on the unpaid balance. The yearly installments will be collected with the
property taxes that are paid to Washington County. You may at anytime thereafter, prior to November 15th of
any year, pay the remaining principal balance (in whole or part) to the City of Stillwater.
.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Engineer's office. Written or oral
objections thereto by any property owner will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount oEan assessment unless a written objection, signed by the property owner, is filed with the clerk prior to
the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may consider an objection to the
amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, if so advised. Upon such action;
affected property owners would receive further notice.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 ~..~..- --- .-- - ---
,
IF COUNCIL ADOPTS
THE ASSESSMENTS,
THIS WILL BE
YOUR INVOICE
FOR THE PROJECT
-----
! J 5t (f)D
4~f6D? I
J .. t
.)~~ .'. We. er
r _ _ .
~~.~-::::: ~
-- -\ i\.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSEDASSESSMENT
FOR NORTH HILL IMPROVEMENTS
(PROJECT 2000-15, L.I. 350)
September 17,2004
HANKWITZ, KRISTIN & T FISCHER
1862 JULIET AVE
ST PAUL, MN 55105
Notice is hereby given that the council will meet at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, October 5,2004
in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 216 N. 4th Street to adopt the proposed assessment for Project No.
2000-15, L.I. 350. The improvement consists of reconstruction of streets, curb and gutter, water main, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer improvements. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements in the North
Hill area include properties in the following borders:
State Hwy 96 to the North, S1. Croix River to the East, Moore Street to the South and County
Road 5 to the . West; and the area East of First Street N orthfrom Elm Street to Eas eet
.our Parcel is described as follows: Parcel Number 2103020130026, located' 115 WILLOW ST E.
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel 0 Illlld IS $200~~<;
"2
The following is an explanation of costs.
$0.00 .
$0.00 vJ~_
$0.00 .1 \;'/lO"""W
'(\t U/l -to ,. . "\ \ J. I ~
$200.38 ..f1)(" nty.J "1M
.... '.' .' . .". "..---
NO INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED IF THKENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID BY NOVEMBER 15,
2004. lfthe assessment isnotpatd!>:yNovember 15, 2004, accrued interest from the date of the adoption of the
assessment roll through December31, 2005 will be added with the first installment due in 2005. Ifpayment is
not received by November 15,2004, the amount listed above will be collected over a 12-year period with
interest added at 4.3% per year on the unpaid balance. The yearly installments will be collected with the
property taxes that are paid to Washington County. You may at anytime thereafter, prior to November 15th of
any year, pay the remaining principal balance (in whole or part) to the City of Stillwater.
...
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Engineer's office. Written or oral
objections thereto by any property owner will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount of an assessment unless a written objection, signed by the property owner, is filed with the clerk prior to
the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may consider an objection to the
.ount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, if so advised. Upon such action,
~cted property owners would receive further notice.
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 f
LOT "30,
BLOCK 4'1
'f>
~~:
8:50 .
----....e
i
~ST
W;;F
:47
O ELECTRIC
TEI..EPH TRANSFORMER
maER ONE [!J
; .
,
,~
. 75e22
& roc
~ Cjje
6141 ~.#. e
J' {;A~.
~~R';e
,"i._~i.ee
~:'V~~-
<ll .
i"&e'
~!/
1
~
<,--
',:
-~~
~.: i
.
Brian &Sonja Larson
2008 Hazel Court
Stillwater, MN 55082
651-351-9476 h
651-430-0056 w
651-210-9642 c
10.04.04
Stillwater City Council
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Council Members,
With this letter we are objecting to the amount assessed against our property at 2008 Hazel Court
in connection with the North Hill Sewer Project No. 2000-15.
In short, the amount we are currently assessed has increased considerably from the 2001
Feasibility Report, and we feel the changes and formula adjustments made since the draft
adjustments have resulted in an unfair assessment burden on our property.
The Total Project Cost has apparently not changed since 2001; both the 5.11e01 Feasibility Report
and the 8.03.04 Resolution are approximately $6.4 million.
,
.
The biggest change between 2001 and 2004 is that the City received - through the hard work of
North Hill residents, the Mayor, and City Staff - $1 e3 million in state funding for the project. The
city assured us that this amount would be applied to the project to reduce the cost to the
residents. If the $1.3 million were distributed equally among the 160 or so taxpayers involved in
the project, we might each expect a reduction of over $8000. We realize it's not that simple. But
we believe wholeheartedly that it is reasonable and fair that each and every property involved
in this project receive some benef'lt ;.v... this $1.3 million.
We have not received a benefit. We have instead seen our assessment increase from
$13,794.23 (2001) to $16,844.71 (2004) - an increase of over $3,000.00.
Because of the way this money was distributed, many residents have shared in the $1.3 million
benefit - but a few have ended up paying more. With the formulas used, the largest and most
valuable lots received considerable reductions in their assessments. The Golf Course's
assessments appear to have been reduced from $228,826 (2001) to $35,575 (2004). We
understand there are other contributing issues with the Golf Course. We understand that other
large vacant and subdividable lots will not pay all fees until developed; the city will get this money
eventually. But in the meantime, this burden is shifted to other properties, and we feel our mid-
sized lot is bearing a disproportionate share of this burden.
We certainly don't begrudge anyone their reduction in assessments. We don't doubt that the 2001
assessment placed an unfair burden on some properties. and the 2004 formulas have made some
assessments more fair. But the end result is that some assessments are made less fair: a
mid-sized, 1 acre lot such as ours is in effect subsidizing the reductions that the other larger
and smaller lots are receiving. We have to believe this is an unintended consequence of the new
formula. We ask that our assessment - and any assessment that increased since 2001 - be re-
evaluated and reduced, sharing equitably in the State funding benefit the rest of the project is
receiving.
.
- -v7~
Cc: Shawn Sanders. City engineer
.
.
.
October 5,2004
City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth St.
Stillwater, M N 55082
Council:
This is to file a protest concerning the overall cost to us of the North Hill Water and
Sewer project.
When we moved here in 1988, we installed a well-and-septic system our 1 1/2 acre lot,
working well within the requirements set by the city. That system has performed
flawlessly for us during the intervening 16 years: A water test we had performed three
years ago by Washington County resulted in a clean bill of health, and drew a hand-
written note saying "you have great water". When we had our septic tank pumped last
year, as required by the County, the contractor noted that there was hardly anything in
the tank that needed pumping.
The assessment estimate with which we were presented is over $16,000. Add to that
hook-up fees and the cost for trenching to run lines from the street to our house and the
cost to us will exceed $20,000. There may be some minor increase in the value of our
home as a result of being on city utilities if and when we sell. There is no way that a
current price tag of $20,000+ is justifiable, and we will continue to oppose the imposition
of this level of assessments and charges.
Sincerely,
">. ~~\_~
James D. Purcell
2001 Hazel Court
Stillwater, MN 55082
.
October 4,2004
City of Stillwater
City Clerk
Re: North Hill Sewer Project Assessment (Project 2000-15)
Property: 1723 Second Street North
Homeowner: Patricia Danaher
Dear Diane Ward,
I would like to make an appeal to the amount of the proposed assessment for
my property. My appeal is based on looking at the cost of the assessment,
plus the cost to have my home connected to the new sewer and water.
.
I have begun to receive bids to install the new water line and the sanitary
sewer line to my house. Because my home sits behind another home on
Second Street, it is going to be very expensive to reach my house. My
current septic system is in the lower part of my back yard, so the trenching
will need to wide and deep to reach where the sewer leaves my house. The
water line is under a large concrete apron around the front of the house.
Essentially, my entire driveway and front yard will be greatly affected, ifnot
destroyed.
The cost of hooking up to the sewer and water will be between $17,000 and
20,000 from my initial bids/discussions. My assessment is $13,178.18. I do
not think being hooked up to the sewer will add $30,000 - $33,000 to the
value of my home. I am aware that because I have a view of the river, that it
might be a hard argument to make, especially in the current housing market.
I have a relatively new septic system (1990's). If the assessment can't be
changed, I would like to pursue not having to hook-up until the time my
home is sold.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, ffA /
Patricia Danaher ~
.~
.
.
.
~.."
/,
/"
/:"
f
To: City of Stillwater
1 ~/~ ~!cO tf7
u)1J7!C-
From: Ron & Doris Christoffersen
Subject: North Hill Assessment - 324 E. St. Croix Avenue
Date: October 4, 2004
1. The assessment of $3,408.88 for water main.
The current water main was replaced with new copper in or around 1982 at a cost
of$995.00 to us. We have paid for water two times and this will now be a third
time.
We should not be charged for any additional cost for water. There is NO benefit
to the property owners on East St. Croix. As for Fire Protection, we have a
hydrant within 200 feet of our properties. This is better protection than many
other properties currently in the City.
The properties on the east side of North Broadway will be the properties with a
direct benefit to water main, therefore they should be assessed in that manner.
Those properties are currently on wells - why should other properties be charged
the same assessment cost?
2. Weare disputing the assessment for street improvement cost.
North Broadway runs east of 324 E. St. Croix on a very steep grade. We gain no
benefit from the upgrade of North Broadway. We do not, and cannot, use North
Broadway to access our property at 324 E. St. Croix. North Broadway dead-ends
at the bottom of the hill. We are at a comer lot, at the top of North Broadway and
East St. Croix and we are being assessed for North Broadway. North Broadway
at this point is virtually a private road for 5 to 6 homeowners, who receive the
actual benefit from the roadway to access their properties. Weare being assessed
the same as those who actually benefit from the road improvement.
.
IF COUNCIL ADOPTS
THE ASSESSMENTS,
THIS WILL BE
YOUR INVOICE
FOR THE PROJECT
r t'water
~ _..~ ~
--- -\ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSEDASSESSMENT
FOR NORTH HILL IMPROVEMENTS
(PROJECT 2000-15, L.I. 350)
September 17,2004
CHRISTOFFERSEN,RONALD F & DO
324 ST CROIX AVE E
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Notice is hereby given that the council will meet at 7:00 p.m., or as soon as possible thereafter, October 5, 2004
in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 216 N. 4th Street to adopt the proposed assessment for Project No.
2000-15, L.I. 350. The improvement consists of reconstruction of streets, curb and gutter, water main, storm
sewer and sanitary sewer improvements. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements in the North
Hill area include properties in the following borders:
State Hwy96 to the North, St. Croix River to the East, Moore Street to the South and County
Road 5 to the West; and the area East of First Street North hUUl Elm StreettoEastSycamore Street
.Your Parcel is describ~das follows: Parc~i~u~ber 2i()~020430087,'1~cated at 324 S'l"CROIXAVE E.
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, orparcel of land is $14,988.86.
The following is an explanation of costs.
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Streets
Storm Sewer
$4,909.23
$3,408.88
$6,560.75
$110.00
NO INTEREST WILLBE CHARGED IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID BY NOVEMBER 15,
2004. If the assessment is not paid 1;>y November 15, 2004, accrued interest from the date of the adoption of the
assessment roll through December 31,2005 will be added with the firstinstalhnent due in 2005. If payment is
not received by November 15,2004, the amount listed above will be collected over a 12-year period with
interest added at 4.3% per year on the unpaid balance. The yearly instalhnents will be collected with the
property taxes that are paid to Washington County. You may at anytime thereafter, prior to November 15th of
any year, pay the remaining principal balance (in whole or part) to the City of Stillwater.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Engineer's office. Written or oral
objections thereto by any property owner will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the
amount of an assessment unless a written objection, signed by the property owner, is filed with the clerk prior to
the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may consider an objection to the
.mount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting, if so advised. Upon such action,
affected property owners would receive further notice.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
LOCAL IMPROVEMENT NO.
1. EXPENDITURES:
1. Awarded Contracts
Bituminous - Tower Asphalt
Water Main - Miller Excavating
2e ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
3. PRINTING AND PUBLICATIONS
4. GRAND TOTAL
:." ~ ";
199
$6112.0.4
2985.00
9.09 T. 0.4
$
90.97
$
J8;78
$
9227,79
II. FINANCING:
Amount to be Re"cei ved from Special Assessmerits $ 7985.00
Amount to be Received from General Taxes $ 1242.79
PREPARED BY.
DATE:
Ni1eL. Kriesel
Sept:ember 21, 1982
"..---.~- -~-'ir
ASSESSMENT BASIS
. L. 1. 199
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COSTS = $7,985.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE STREET COST $5,000.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE = &00
COST PER FRONT FOOT =
5,000.00
&00.00
8.3333
TOTAL ASSESSABLE WATER SERVICE COST
$2,985.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE UNITS = 3
COST PER UNIT
2985.00
3 = 995.00
.
.
.
.
Stillwater, Minnesota
PARCEL & OHNER
8-09270-4340
Mary Jo Heingarten
1221 North First Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
8-09270-4240
Edward Rauen
1220 North Broadway
Stillwater, }CliIh'iesota 55082
8-09270-5220
Thomas R. . Ewing
1305 North First Street
Stillwater, ~lirmesota 55082
8-09270-5200
George Middleton
1312 North Broadway
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
lV1ALS
ASSESSf'lENT ROll
L. L 199
STREET
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
$916.67
$333.33
$5,000.00
! ~--~ j,"-:'"
ASSESSlvJF.NT
WATER SERVICE
..TOTAL
$1,250, PO
$995..00
$2,245.00
...$1,250.00
$995:00
$1,911.67
$995,00'
$1;328.33
$7,985.00
$2,985.00'
.
.
.
~~~~;~~~il~:~ii,"!~,j~f~i;";
. .
.
~ t-'PI'F"'" t ~ .,,,.... .. 'CiS./
R'g No. / f- Sr 'Ii; y,.'~t:,(rd""!'-0
~(J) / (~~if)/}fJ< ;..l~;~~
liZ~ ~7 11/: !,;1Y / ivl'<I)
/. ( ',)/
RETURN ON INSTALLATION
1'7 (l '> ! ~
Own" K{~ftrL'j(~"t
. Address .1J- c/ E!e _~ e f,./1~_4~
J I /
A/? e-t.-' ,
Meter No Sizp
j':"'/A-,'F SV/ e:J. ee 1/ .
Size of lap . Si~'Curb Cock /~
1/,,'( {)J..I.~I~ IfV~",..-< .P ~
/Siie Service .., Kind of Pipe (!/ II" .\
Kind of Excavating
~S"'''dY - .2. /- J~ compf'.J"Z.?fj'
: Re rk.' :7-> ~:'>> q->t::;Jy
..'/11 ../,~ Pressurp
. d!aa~e,o~ c~rfep I' L:; Y- L/ y I AI ~
1/ . / '
77' LLJ-a!lJJ / C I :u) S 70) IS
!/ ~E f- Ir's ~~tv if 4~
: .' r '. ;~ " f-' . -------; _I
/ ,. ///. '~EWER . / ,e / '. ~
.
Location in Street
(
~-
Location on Pro pert; Line
~~
r
R,nm'~. ..A,.__f~
..4.' 1:
Datp ,?-,) J - J~V
'-I5:w.~ eLvl
(I /1<-A~~~"~
Foreman
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER
.
SERVICE CONNECTION
15:)Y
N O..eeeoeo._Leeeo__.e.e.e....._em__..__h..._....e_
.
.',
Stillwater. Minn....22't:45T....eo.LL._...e1923~.me
The BOARD. OF WATER COMMISSIONERS will install
connection with water ~ '~""o-.C mains at No~;Z__i-ee
LZrdlL..._e...kl~~...e.e........eo....... street
situate on Lot NOh....m..___..........___m_.........eoe..eeeBlock NOeoee.e"h..e_.eo......__eo.e...eo...e..
.eo.e__e..h........e.eee__.....e__h._eeoh.ee..m......eeee_eo_.e.....__..._.......eo_.e....e.... A ud i ti on to
Stillwater, owned by ,..Qa~../(_......2lliU~
-10J' \7- e
BY.......eo...:L.:.7.._e_.._.inch galvanized iron pipe ItmL_...........e._e.........eee
i;'-~.:. .JtmW. ~'':r pIpe .eo...L=.t.;Lmeekil.__~l.L&;Z::h"
...._J~~.e~~~Lg!~c//T~
.~e.acLc~&:.:Q2-:L~.~~......
e..~.e...._L~~..
The cost of the above connection is hereby esUmated .to
~4Z~.!2.__ I -- ---
Dated >7Z''Ve.e...e.._'('2: .. 19U....ee_
~~M~~
~7....._m~ ~ '. Englneere
$.._e...ee.._!.:...1e.~e__.__...._.._.....ee.THE estimated cost of installing
the above""~nnection having been duly paid. pel1"misslon
for the connection requested above is hereby grantetl
.
MAY 1 9 ~931
secr~~~f Water comm~ioners.
Dated
192
.
,.","
V
i.
J
I
I
)
I
t
!
/ 9-~se/()
:;t!L7! )Iv I!tJwSC e ff
Reg. No
.1
C /",/~'(-~e
--
RETURN ON I~L~TION
owner;;;::;/f r~:!.~'d~~e.di:' i.LU-
/ . / /
Addres< /j::;Z y p,~ ..d/. /:~<"3':/ r'l!o(
Meter No.
Size
Size of Tar
'7 If
Size Curb Cock ;l/y
Kind of Pipe C;~lZ_y~q
'/
-:J e If
Size Service j / '-/
/" /
Kind of Excavating
Started~/...;;.I- -07 ~ComPleted j' "~/-7!.
.-7J' ' .'
Re,r;'arki(~~L/~W1 Y~~t.:(A.'/- ;,J-"i;; 4..;...ir:)
Jl'/~ f/..-
( /V-frl-lJ( __--.-Pressur;-- .... _e_-
,><.___ __ . e _'
Location of Curb Stop / ;// j/::c/ [~5- l~( >
. /'e'--;L / ..
(,-1,.( t.-I,. ( /> e /'-' {< i~e:!C 4' ,,/,,20 'H
/
SEWER
Location in Street
Location on Property Line
Remark. /!t~(,,,, >~~,,"/lt'te"'(/} 9 c: ,...t-/: l
0'-'" r;~/f'/l~q ee L:,<' 1.le~ / J~; '/
/ / /1 1/(./ f/ .'/e ,./~ J
/e~ .f' p./-P /' /t'_r"'?~ ~. ',/ it/a -;;rd:
, /'.- /r // .. /
5 ' r-J / v . #
Datp -;..1 - / fa / P __-1 ./f~~c{,:?~
Foreman
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER
.
~
Reg No.
SD #333.3
19-540
Oat'"
June 1. 1976
p
-
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
J
I
,
! ~e
I .9
~
! 'm
I M
: ~
I ~
I, ~
I E
: '"
, .(q
1 e ii
1
J ~
, .....
: '8
I *
i 'J1
,j' til
I,
t ~
1 0
I ~
{ Q)
, ...
,I Q)
J m
J" '"'"
't '"
it; ...
;~
,1.
" ~
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
204 NORTH THIRD ;:'.l~T
STILLWATER - MINNESOTA
Tn Ron Chri8torre~tm
12L. E st Croix Ave
Rt.i llwa.ter Mirm
.
\"
.
RenEM Sernce (stop to House)
M~ 21, 1976 J
35 ft. 3/411 'l'ype (K) Copper
1 .. 3/4" e/I Curb stop
1 ... 1~1I HB\Vs Curb Box
1 - 3/4" 3 pc. Union
1 - 3/4" Ford Heter Valve
Labor - 2 hrB. @ 7.00 per hr.
"
48 65
16 1.9
18 50
:3 41
9 59
14 00
11'0 64
Reg, NOe
19"'S/J>
Board of Water
Commissioners
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
TO
non Cl~istorferson
l11ac. 110.64
.
.
,,~.....
.
'j'
~. .! ...r.
Vi..d, --
;! . . e~ ):?..d.h'1I.
t~. :j1j
WATER1~, PARTMENT
~~1 ..~
. STIL ~ATER. MINN.
Lake water ....-e.__._e...........eh_ee.......Spring Water ..n.h...h_e_m.hm__.:
S('f~ce furnished building N:a.u..-~:I.,ur_.......-..hmn....
....t;~.e.xJi._e~...ri:d._...S~~
lJsed for ue._"..u........-------. ._._...e_Aee_..e.__.nd_.mee_______e.. ......__.hud........._. _...e
CJ;;;l.
OWlled by jrO I .. __"__,,.0000 _.e....__._.n..~e______mee_m_._e.._n_
Occup;cd e .m..;~.. .......,......:m...._m
La t No. '00' h......---.....---.....__..Block..ede.e___e_e_._ee_..e_nm___e_h....e
.r'....e.e..e,e-....~.e.,...em~e....____.e Addition
,
Co rn er Lo t? .____..ee_...._____e h._hn.......ee_....____m. e.___.. ...._ee._..._________...._...e._.n_
No. Rooms .hm__hn_ne_n__ee
No. Floo rs ..._m__h__n__nmnn__mee__
Bath Tubs nm..he__.h......._e___n._mShower Bathse___.n_m_..._._en____e__
Water Closets eum....e____e_e__h._eU rinals ...-.m_.m__en.h........e_.m.__eenm_
Ho,>e Bibbs outsideh...ehhe_._.eeee_._...ln hou~e .._.._enmdU.e._e_me_.___
A u to m a tic Pu mps ...____n.nee...dn_....u_e_.e___...m_.e_______eh e___eehn_e_nh___...m._
Fountai ns .-.e_hh._eeU.e_._____.hm.m.e...Size Nozzle hn_.___e_.....e___.e.....n__e...__
Steam Heat .e..__h....___.__...n_____Hot Water do. h_e_m.h___n..._h'n...ee
Stable wi th service '..m__...__ ___.n.__mn._. without n.ehnh__n,.e...mh....
~~Se.----..........e.-.---.;h....-.- ~o. Cows ..h:U..em.....U.____._h.....___.
~:t::rn-il...efeetiL~rome~......e-
~f~h1.I~~=<...
~-!.lJddd~M.:~~
~~~:e~_~. ..!)~~__q~::~~~_-_m_-
J (I J/J--rJ1 /~/ . \
e .n..L.--en.njd/..h..~..e..___f/.n~~~.e Ins~.
(Ove~ ~~ \
i
I
1
I
I
..".,'F.o>1
" .
l~lt&~e \c':;; .' " L ?"j .
J, e e~._ . ..' No. .1&!.e__......._n"h. .' .
1:';3f~.~-,,, y;~ ~!.~/rf:';' " <. M-' : -- . ~. . ,':. _._ > e. <.,
1.,:':;\\1/ ATER.;DEPARTMENT.
r ..,--' ' STILLWATER. MINN.
f
:
,
.[~
.~~t
L k t . . Spring Water__......___.e_....._..eh.~
i ,i a ~ wa er _~e...____nme_.h~_m:....n__ . ~ ~_e1e.....e.._Ue...e_h
Sl'rvlce.furmshed bUlldwg No. .__e_u___e.eeee_..__n
0Yd'UY~l~7/;"lt
d'f '4/1,.. #-... L' d y. '1_..___ennm e_{__.._.J.. ue/e.
Use or J~'''i;-ee!!;tJ~e./ n~ . ...:_mue.ee_
Owned bY'~{ie .. ...mmee..... .r.. ......e....~_e .em.m_..mu...... m_em..n.e__e
; .
. ./ ~ "
Occupied' by .....m.e_.... mee....menn. h...m._mn_m....._m............._.e..__meem...
L't No . -.c:L lllock._e_e....e..mee....mem..ee.........____
_e~_ee.....een~._~e.u-eeee~ee.m.....e...em.._.. Addition
Corner Lot?m...eeen.::~;;ehn.m.._~e.e-me-mee-..m/..e-.....-e---e
N R b No. Flo.or!l.e....!..~..._.....~.-
o. ooms ...._.....mnee__e . .
! i
Bath Tubs ..__.e.e.....~_...n_..............Shower Bath~L.mmm...........m_..._
'XT l Closets' U dnals e.....mn.....e_......m_..............m_~
'f a er e......_.m_.m..e....._
Hose Bibbs outside ......memme_m_n.uln home _.....e._..m....meeee.....
Autom atic P'i mps .....e_....m..e..~.e._e......e__e.e......._e...._. e,ee.............._e........
F t. Size Nozzle m_..m..hUem....ee..m.._.....
oun aIDs uuo_uu......e.u..uo_.e.um_e._ .
i
I
f
, ,
, '
I
!
,
i
Steam Heat___.....em___m.....eHot Water do. .......m....em..._.........
., 'thout e....____................:
Stable wlth servIce .m..m...e.._n.._._...e WI .. . '.
No. Horses_e...e.e.e....._......._.......em No. Cows e......e...m um.....m.....,,,e
T. . . e J-(, feet u......d~om..e.:_...". .... ..,..e.e......"..
ap Isu-..:'-f_e.um.-... . .
r r it. '. .' ..mm..m_~.._'''_'''''U. St. Ave.
~~:~~~__ m_.~_'
~m!..ee-e-...ue..-..-e.ee...ee...eem-..----..e..e--..-e-e.........e..e...e..e.._.._.._
~al'd _~.._;/;_.._ 10';/--;,<
..JJ!.:::!!mlL~_._ln'l!;
(Over)
.:--.:.';.
.';...~
.
14 -8 50
.Water' en:
Jtin~_4, .
'","e;'
.,~S
I ()).' ..".
I
.
l:tJ
r.n
>-3
Q.
::0'
o
H
x
:>
-4
t;l
.i:t~:~<~;:~},;~
.;:-~.
..Y:t~~;-:.. ....
~~1F>.'"~
'Si." !
" ,
,9'
'" :;,
....;-.-- '(
.
())
o
.
. ..:.....
\1
,"(
I
':-'
...1A5"'
\'-'
"'"
"':"!f'
'" '
V\
'~
'<' ,',
- '-.J
(]
. \
.\
..\.
~"
._~_..
I" 0' "fA., P','p p
.
Water en
.
"'---,
J c;' .e "
,/ t .. ,__., . "J; .'"
, ,.. ,,' '--"";.../,r .r:,'
..,~ ".".' l-/,;'; "'-.' .....' '", "
------
~
'f'\ B20 P45
/1' 5'10
14-850 Jack Hallquist
324 E St CrQix Ave
Lot 2 Block 23
Carli & Schulenberg Add.
June 4,1931
SCALE: 30' - 1 Inch
/ q \' ~'
~//
,'7:
.r-.......,'
V \
r I
I
I
! I
,;# ..1;L'I' i
t--1;'f
.
'-
-----
~
'J" , LoJ,e
/ I so,J dl>, c.h ) '~
~ jeN 11"
JP,. '{I,
IV '7 j'y
I
fQ~1
~ r ~ [
1\
I
~,'.:,).,3,'
cl' i
~\--(): '
"I 7eTel\
,2
I
if"
/311-
r r{ bC;o,J
.
4/ /
;; /< () /f J::> 1/\/ N :',/
~ ./ , el/
x
i
I
- - - -~"-f'\f\y56~ .- -- - - ,.-- ,,-j:~- .--
i
/ I { -':t---
(J' -.S
JV' (?-V "
}(fII-'- ~
3
/lUt
1_-
-1t,7
ee-'<'~; " <!- "
~' "e"0
lo1- <;;'
-r
V-
~ ..,
"
l'
(,7'
\
- ~----
\U
';S,
~e
~
- ""-
~
~
~)
\:
Crd
.
.J/
;1'/:: J 0
'l- ~UJ
fD II
/ ' "I<~i)
G'P,IN
, ... to ,I-r-
1818N.I"Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
.
'~O;t..1r~' S"c'ho,..'en'" .'I?",l~~r;e
J,;:I,",:itat,I -'-, '." /"",;':~N~,
October 5, 2004
City of StiIJwater
Dear Sir or Madam:
In regards to the property located at 1818 N I SIc Street, the assessment cost was placed at $11 ,29L33.
The sewer and water stub were tenninatedjust south of Willow St., which creates a long hook up run
to the housee The question is, what went into the calculation of this cost, when this property, other
than 16 feet of N 1 sf Street has no ties to either W iIJow or N e 2nd Street.
Sincerely,
. John Schpenecker
.
.
. Oct. 2, 2004
.
.
To: Stillwater City Council
Regarding: Property at 1817 N. 2nd St., Stillwater, MN
The two lots on the corner of Willow St. and North Second St. have
not been buildable for the better part of five years because:
A moratorium on building on the north hill was in place for the
better part of three years.
After the moratorium was lifted, the current sewer and water project
projected schedule was such that building on the property was not
an option until the project was completed. It was also necessary to
establish the assessment amount, and whether one or two lots were
buildable.
Once the sewer and water timetable was completed, and it appeared
the work was to start, a purchase agreement was entered into. The
buyer requested that the property not close until we were sure the
sewer and water project would be completed this year, and the final
assessment was known.
Access fees were not discussed at neighborhood info.nuation
meetings. Had they been, we would have accelerated closing, and a
builrHng penllit likely requested so that the assessments would have
been made.
We request that the hookup fees be waived and the assessment be
reinstated.
Julie and Richard Edstrom
~ f' ~
. /' j,. i !Id . ':,(' --" ....
! QU~ ..~
lu- S - kof-(
.
J'lk..r ~-L ~,-d!ku~
rft: tk ~~'.... (),vd<. r. ..../~ j}. . -kt- k~. e ~ ~rJ2-t,zt
, ~. () r, .-V 7 J
lli-vi.~ ~'1i~ -:~ C!~eik! /~ ~<-u ,72.f~,-j<-
Pi).; d ~ jHl , . -.-fA' t' "
~~~~~~~~
.
:::1 ~~7::f:i~~
~ ~l~, ~-r:t: ~ ~ /--u~ ~"L . .
~-:Y ~/2.- ~ #~4. tL k~ 'I-~
J~,V I u'~ 0
.
/1 <7.
~!'J~
5u~(/JV1 (; ".;}lU7ttd-eii.
f /3. N. ~7
~~
fS/ - 'f3r- 1"0'78'
.
.
()~ cJ~EJ: S "2-00 '-t
L
. ~- ,,0 :
~:
u.:
CA~ ~G-\.~ l ~~ o!- <;:rlt.u.v~
~AL€. <;H-A~
leal C( Uc 'Tl+ <;''1' /'N) J- "'t1'1
MJxl-\ lfti,.c. P~1"~ ..k\<j;~ B-\)~
<E NA v.st.l-m,.rt, 'I 0 ,prl'~EAt- ~ l-?--a~\,~
~ ~l~-/'STs tto()t:- v/> -rT> "'~ S'f;x.....,U
~() w ~ vJoJ-' G-6~ 0$- ~ Pt4~
1\fL Go<;r c* (,\.v~- v-f WLl.L BE' M LEAS'"
d u> ( 00 () 6/'-f ov..t... Col. \P~ ~f.. A ,,~
. l"J!.vJ \.,U~ +-0 J.. ~~ ~.j) .A ~-E.pnc::. <;1, ~
~ \. c;; ~"-"1 ~ r vI'- Ac. . \..Pt WCY~ MP-&c.. ~
-y~ ~ ~c.. ~ ,'Vel ~)..:(; ft-
/;-trx:t;....~ tLPQuI.~SN\ ~ o~ ov-12. ~-r v.viLC-
1tfe .. t """E' CJVL t&ru Sf. ~f) Vol" ~ So l," .
~"'-1,0\.... ~ ~ ~SLl)~.
~
.
.
City Administrator
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
October 04, 2004
Re: Proposed Assessment for North Hill bnprovements Parcel No. 2103020430035
As the owners ofthe above parcel located At 1220 Broadway Street North we object to
portion of the proposed assessment for North Hill improvements. (Project 200-15,
L.I.350)
In the explanation of costs mailed to us there is $3,408.88 in costs for Watermain. We
purchased this house in August of 2003 and the house is connected to the city of
Stillwater water service. It is unfair and improper to charge us an assessment for a water
main that does not improve my property. I object to the watermain cost of $3,408.88 and
appeal for a re-consideration of my special assessment.
Sincerely
William J. Klein and
.
Jean M. Klein
1220 Broadway Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
651-351-2770
.
.
\
)
.
. 10- 5-Ptj
t.e: /QcJ5 f\/()Zi1lsJ
---.--- ~....._._----_.. -....-.- ....-..--. .._-~_... . --_..._.._.~----,- .---- ---
~
)
ocr '] ( l1>li~
-J. JI>h. (\ Co (PlAin ..~SlP{'Y(J-;
a;t. . kk.e-fr,pwit(p;v .${:.n__.__
Objed .~ u+~nj)rf~---..._;:
Lt,., I. OS€AVQf prP.F-~ -...--.
~~~SYV'-~ .~_~~_~.f1>~~...
uJ.~I/~~ ~ .QS$~$J.~~.:~.!.,~'e:; .
fl> uk.. ~A+cx.-Ir cX_~JsZ?___u
.uu_Ql.?J~"f/+--fp~...ffi(v,J~-~.u
~r_~I~~.~~~~~p-_G!f__..- .
~C'l)_~c.es -S ("'"~~j_"~u(~ .
'tr.. ~~-t!t>I'..~~.....~\\."_~~unl~
c...u. U"~C~~~~~...Le." .-.". .-.. ~.
mCfiJ.W,Cdf) . '
ui "
) .
!
'lo-f;ftC?.1 dz, ."firt!_~A!~~i_"~__n
.tf 5~~~ (if. 'IV_~.}5Z~/!___~.__.". .
:;:t:. ~u U~S;~(J.~
! ~ftT:lt 4s~~m:if Uu
~ my tl... ."
.J~&~>~~ ..
.~ u/ =::;:....... ...
.
.
.
.
.
~." \9-S:- ctf....
I 0 ~t.Q1~,-"/~:.-tJ&,,..br-PJ
-J ~ck, ~ ....--
~.aA- tJ^^~..
OJ>- -v(- ~~ ~.~.
.{J-I.Lr~~~~ '
.~~E~.
~.~.'
.
~...-
\~~I
J-, ..-;jJ
~~f1~
!o/5htJO y
.--Si//w~~{;7. ~. .--.-.-
, re' ;VoP-I4.I?;;(J>.r~ ''"Ie</: ~
I
i -.----.--.------.--.--- --
: I. !1y.~ (19:0&L~f!J
h4J U- _~ .s'~_ S<l 1~A1u !"1__I{..~_f'.!.~__e
_ f-11__f/.-:2_~_Jf:'____=_~~4(>. ct_~~_~__ .._._.
~~~~. ~~Jc~~_e~_~
m~ ~-L..z.~.-~.7--F-f-4~~/~
/wa.J... IAJJ:"~ J 1;:{2 .
.~. ~.. .- ~'----a-:- ..__________e_____
2-~e~j(& .~. ~ Nor_~--6------
_~_ -h C/fy.,t<J4 oi. .5~..IA..Ji( M _~
A#TY~ _fo.. ~ ~..~-~!e~~e
SMrl~W~ d(.~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~_.
M.~J.u m/fV. My. ~C~'cA. ~
~r ILfs'(6Y) i> (0 r~o(t/.. ~._
it<.f~hc ~.~ ~ i~<-K~-S"~_
1~~~~~~(t4~_
11 ~~ ~"~.' ~ >'~l ~~f=-)_
- flv.", I J ~ ',f-~ 1'J-~.-f:(( ~
SI/ /I .
(fnt-......~.
, (pS I /' if] 1:[/ J]~-Z-
.
.
.
Gary Germain
Michael Wente
125 Willow St. E.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Oct. 5,2004
Re: 125 WILLOW ST E
Parcel #2103020130020
To the HonOrable City Council:
First of all, thank you to the city and the allied organizations for offering grants to those of us who
cannot afford the services associated with hooking up city sewer and water.
The objection to our $17,076 assessment has nothing to do with our inability to pay. Rather, it
simply does not makes sense in view of our current property value vs. those of our neighbors.
We bought our house in 2000 for $110,000. Based on sales of adjacent homes and properties,
today it is probably worth $200,000. The $17,000 assessment plus $8,000 in hookup fees means
our property value would be expected to increase by $25,000, or 12.5%, solely because of public
water and sewer, curbs, and nice streets.
We find this idea hard to believe.
Most importantly, though, we have the great misfortune of living on a long, narrow corner lot with
lots of streeet frontage. Because of the shape of our property, it cannot be subdivided. Had we
had a piece of \and that was shaped differently, or was twice the size, we would have been able
to subdivide our land. In that case, since the city is not charging for additional lots, we would have
been assessed for maybe half the street frontage.
Furthermore, we are bearing the burden for all North Hill residents who drive by our two streets,
but have the good fortune of not living ON the street. They benefit just as much by improved
streets as we do-and moreso because we get the brunt of the new traffic, while they live away
from it.
For example, the nice, hidden home behind us was recently purchased for $580,000 and has
very little street frontage, so that household is being charged only $3,789 for street frontage vs.
our $8,526. Similarly, another neighbor who has a newer, elegant home and 76,000 square feet
of property has NO street frontage and is therefore being assessed $0 for streets.
Bottom line: We are being punished because our lot is TOO SMALL to subdivide. We believe we
should be charged the average North Hill assessment of roughly $12,000.
Thank you very much for considering this request.
~~~
GaL
\:.
II
~
..
Ken And Mary Harycki
2004 Hazel Ct
Stillwater, MN 55082
I !-..~ ._- :? / !) 1
City Of Stillwater
216 N Fourth
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re North Hill Assessments
To Whom It May Concern:
We are disputing the proposed assessments for the North Hill Improvements. Even after
the residents of North Hill went to the state and obtained money for this project, we feel
that the assessed amount, the Sac and Wac Tax and the cost of the actual hookup, will not
exceed the actual increase in our property value. Additionally, these costs represent a
financial hardship for us now.
. Sincerely,
A
en Harycki
~ ~;:LtJ~f~'
Mary Harycki
.
f
.
.
.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council V
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
September 29, 2004
Public Hearing on Adoption of Revised Boutwell South Area Plan. Case
No. CPA/02-01.
Background. The Revised Boutwell South Area Plan is presented and recommended
by the Planning Commission, 8-9-04, and Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board,
8-- 25-04, for City Council adoption.
This revised Boutwell South Area Plan contains land use policy recommendation #3 that
states:
"Annexation and development of lands in the South of.Boutwell Planning
area should not occur until a specific Neal Avenue connection location and
design has been determined.- The Planning Commission continues to
recommend that Neal Avenue be extended from Boutwell Road and
connected at Northland Avenue. They continue to have concerns for
allowing discretionary Phase IV development before Manning Avenue
(Washington County) and Boutwell Road improvements are made."
This policy reflects traffic concerns expressed during preparation of the Boutwell
Transportation Study that is included in the Revised Boutwell South Area Plan as
Attachment "D".
The original purpose of preparing a guide for development of the Boutwell South Area is
accomplished by the Boutwell South Area Plan.
Recommendation: Approval of Revised Boutwell South Area Plan.
Attachments: Boutwell South Area Plan, Joint Board staff report and minutes, 8-24-
04, letters from Bruggeman Properties, 9-13-04 and Gail Pundsack, 8-25-04.
1
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
August 25,2004
.
Present: Township Representatives Dave Johnson and Duane Laabs
City Representatives David Junker and Wally Milbrandt
Others: City Community Development Director Steve Russell,
City Administrator Larry Hansen and City Attorney David Magnuson
Chair David Johnson called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
Mr. Milbrandt, seconded by Mr. Junker, moved to adopt the agenda as presented; motion
passed unanimously.
Boutwell South Area Plan
Mr. Russell briefly reviewed the plan development. When the plan was first adopted by
the City Planning Commission and forwarded to the City Council in 2002, the Council
expressed a concern about traffic. A traffic study was completed and the results
incorporated in the plan now under consideration. The key recommendations in the traffic
study relate to Brick Street/Deerpath and the future Neal Avenue alignment, he said. The
land use in the original plan has not been changed. Mr. Russsell reviewed the land use
designations. He noted that the Boutwell area is in the Phase IV annexation area (2015). .
Early annexation may be considered if 100 percent of the affected property owners
petition the City to do so and if City services are available.
Mr. Johnson noted the Board had dealt with the land use component of the plan
previously. He asked about the role of the traffic study. Mr. Russell reviewed the traffic
study recommendations. Mr. Russell suggested another component of the traffic
management is the completion ofthe Curve Crest-County Road 15 connection.
Mr. Johnson opened the public hearing. Providing comments were:
Ed Otis, 12070 87th St. Circle N. - Mr. Otis suggested the City should "slow down" and
figure out how to get major north/south arteries in place. He referred to current traffic
congestion on County Road 15 and suggested things would only get worse if
development is allowed before County Road 15 improvements/lights are completed.
Gail Pundsack, 140 Northland Ave. - Ms. Pundsack said annexation shouldn't occur until
a decision is made on the Neal Avenue connection. She also voiced a concern about such
a connection's impact on the Croixwood area.
Mike Adams, 12950 75th St. N. - Mr, Adams stated his property is located at Northland
and County Road 12. When he built his house 25 years ago, Washington County directed
him as to where to place his driveway as there would be a road (Neal Avenue) coming
through at some point in the future. He suggested that the area will be part of the City .
"whether in 2015 or 2006."
1
~
f
.
.
.
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
August 25, 2004
Steve Nelson, 770 Minar Lane N. - Mr. Nelson said the City ought to look at traffic on
Minar, too, a road that already exists and already is being used by cut-through traffic. He
also referred to a future problem of making a left onto County Road 12 if all traffic is
directed to County Road 15.
Don McKenzie, 12620 72nd St. - Mr. McKenzie asked about the status of a median
initially shown at the NeallNorthland connection. Mr. Russell said the median was an
early suggestion that is not currently under consideration. Mr. McKenzie also expressed a
concern about the increase of traffic on 72nd Street, a gravel road never intended to be a
through street.
Kristi Muetzel, 120 Northland Ave. - Ms. Muetzel also expressed a concern about the
Neal Avenue connection and impact on traffic.
Bob Lohmer, 12960 75th St. N. - Mr. Lohmer spoke of addressing traffic problem before
development occurs. He said whether Neal Avenue goes through to County Road 12 or
not, the problem on County Road 15 needs to be addressed.
Mr. Magnus noted that the City can charge developers impact fees for sewer/water but
not for traffic solutions. As a practical matter, he said, there is no way to pay to construct
roads in advance. He also pointed out that the City has no control over county roads.
Loree Neitz, 7865 Manning Ave. N. - Ms. Neitz spoke of the existing congestion on
Manning A venue. She stated that three years ago Manning A venue exceeded traffic
capacity and yet was deemed not to be a priority. Now, every plan directs traffic to
Manning, she said. She also questioned the fact that the plan shows talking her property,
front and back, for park use.
Richard Schultz, 13055 Boutwell Road - Mr. Schultz asked if a location of Neal Avenue
between Boutwell and County Road 12 has been established. Mr. Russell stated that has
been established in concept only. Mr. Schultz noted the concept plan shows the City
taking his land for Neal Avenue.
Mr. Lohmer asked who makes plans for egress/ingress from an extended Neal Avenue if
a property owner doesn't want to develop.
Mr. Russell stated it is the recommendation of the City Planning Commission that the
Neal Avenue connection be resolved prior to any development/annexation. He stated that
the location of the road is primarily a City decision. Public hearings will be held by the
Joint Board and City Council.
Steve Fisher, representing Bruggeman developers, noted his company owns 18 acres and
has been working with the City for the last five years; the company contributed to the
2
"'
,
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
August 25,2004
.
traffic study. He said the company was OK with the South Boutwell plan except for the
land use recommendation #3 - that annexation/development in the planning area not
occur until a specific Neal Avenue connection location and design are determined. He
pointed out that if the City approved annexation of the Bruggeman-owned property this
year, the earliest a product could be on the market would likely be 2006.
Mr. Johnson closed the public hearing at 8 p.m.
Mr. Johnson pointed out that there are many outside factors affecting the traffic situation.
He said he would not like to push all traffic onto County Road 15, which is why he favors
the Neal Avenue connection to County Road 12. He also suggested that the City should
be more aggressive in getting the Curve Crest frontage road completed to County Road
15 and make a concerted effort to get Washington County to do the County Road 15
improvements, 4-lane, all the way to Highway 96 and not stop at County Road 12.
Mr. Milbrandt noted the Boutwell South plan has been before the City for two and a half
years. He said he would not want any annexation until the Neal Avenue connection is
decided.
Mr. Junker moved to adopt the revised Boutwell South Area plan, with the added
recommendation that the City take an aggressive stance with Washington County .
regarding the Manning Avenue improvements. Mr. Laabs seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously.
Zoning Man Amendment changing the zoning of a 1.5-acre parcel from Agricultural
Preservation, AP, to Lakeshore Residential, LR, at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue, Richard and
Leah Peterson, applicants.
Mr. Russell reviewed the requested. He noted that request is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. Properties on the east side of Mid Oaks are zoned RA; properties
on the west side of Mid Oaks are designated LR. City services are available and of a
capacity to accommodate the request, he said. The City's Planning Commission reviewed
the request and recommended approval.
Mr. Johnson opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m.
Richard Peterson, applicant, said he realizes his neighbors' concerns regarding the
character of the neighborhood. He said he and his wife love the neighborhood and the last
thing they would want to do is change that. He said he had offered to revise the
neighborhood's former covenants to address those concerns. He also noted that what they
are asking to do is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
.
3
.
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
August 25,2004
Speaking in opposition were Louise Jones, 7-79 Mid Oaks; Deidre Kramer, 7100 Mid
Oaks; Charlie King, 70Q30 Mid Oaks; Candis Braatz, 7070 Mid Oaks;.Heidi Bums, 7190
Mid Oaks; Don McKenzie, 72nd Street; and Richard Huelsmann, 62nd Street.
Concerns expressed by Mid Oaks residents included changing the character of the
neighborhood, setting a precedent for future subdivision requests, increased traffic;
impact on property values, and the type of home that might be placed on the subdivided
lot. Liz Kramer, attorney with Leonard, Street and Deinard representing Wesley and
Deidre Kramer, briefly spoke of the "public necessity" and "community welfare"
standards required for approval; a letter from Ms. Kramer also was included in the
agenda packet.
Mr. Huelsmann noted that a similar situation occurred on 62nd Street in the past year,
where one property owner wanted to subdivide his property and the other residents in that
area did not want their zoning changed to LR. He called on the City to develop a new
zoning classification for the large lot areas of 62nd Street, Jackson Estates, Mid Oaks, and
portions of Nightingale Boulevard, currently zoned AP, that fits the land uses in the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
.
Mr. Johnson closed the public hearing at 9:25 p.m.
,
Mr. Milbrandt said he was not in favor of the rezoning.
Mr. Junker stated he did not like having just one lot zoned differently. He noted the
Planning Commission did discuss rezoning the entire street, rather than having a hodge-
podge zoning. He also noted that rules are in place that were established in the
Annexation Agreement and Comprehensive Plan to determine the long-term zoning. Now
that someone has started the process of requesting rezoning to that shown in the
Comprehensive Plan, the City should play by those rules.
Mr. Russell pointed out that when the 62nd Street request was considered, it was the
recommendation that the entire area be considered for possible rezoning. The other
neighbors did not want that, and the Joint Board and City Council rezoned just the one
parcel.
.
Mr. Magnuson pointed out that the AP zoning, which requires 10 acres, is not consistent
with the Comp Plan. Until just recently, if one of the properties in the AP designation
burned down, the owner wouldn't have been able to rebuild because the lot was
substandard according to the AP zoning. He also noted that if the City decides to change
the Comprehensive Plan to include some new zoning classification, such as large lot, it
must be approved by the Metropolitan Council. The Met Council might not approve that
classification because of the availability of city services, he said.
4
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
August 25, 2004
.
There was a question as to what would happen should the Joint Board deny the request.
Mr. Magnuson said any appeal would go to District. Court. Mr. Laabs asked if the
standard has been met to justify a change in zoning. Mr. Magnuson responded in the
affirmative.
Mr. Junker moved to recommend that the City Council uphold the Planning
Commission's recommendation for approval of the request. Mr. Milbrandt seconded the
motion; motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Junker suggested that the City ought to consider a larger lot classification for the
annexation areas. Mr. Junker moved to ask the City Council to direct city staff to look at
a possible new zoning for the AP areas. Mr. Milbrandt seconded the motion; motion
passed unanimously.
Other items:
Mr. Russell provided a brief update on expansion area building permit numbers; the
City's recent and proposed trail improvements; possible land purchase for expansion of
the Brown's Creek natural area; and expansion area road improvements.
Regarding road improvements, Mr. Russell noted that Washington. County applied for,
but did not receive, federal funds for the Manning Avenue improvements. He said the
County currently is looking at Manning to County Road 12 improvements in 2007; those
improvements were initially scheduled for 2004. Boutwell Road improvements are a City
project, which could occur as early as next year. Mr. Russell also noted there has been
some talk of a sale of the Bergman property, which would open up the Curve Crest
extension frontage road.
.
There also was a brief update on the Phase III expansion area. Mr. Russell said in
discussions to date, developers have not been specific about the number of units, but an
estimate would be about 340. The area would include large-lot single-family, small lot
detached, and town house. There was a concern expressed about the visual impact of
locating all the higher density housing along Manning.
The recording secretary left at 10:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary
.
5
· vemorandum
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
. . August 10, 2004
Boutwell South Area Plan Public Hearing
Background. The Joint Board participated in the development and the approval of the
Boutwell South Area Plan in 2002. On July 24, 2002, the Joint Board approved the plan
(see attached staff report and minutes). After Joint Board approval of the plan, a City
Council public hearing was held on September 17, 2002, where the plan was tabled
until an expansion area traffic study was completed.
In 2003, the City of Stillwater partnered with Washington County, MnDOT and US
Homes in the development of the Boutwell Area Traffic Study. The study was
completed in 2003 and recommendations approved by the City Council Spring 2004
(see Attachments A and D Boutwell South Area Plan and City Council
recommendations) .
e.
After City Council traffic study reconsideration and approval, the plan was brought back
to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation with the new traffic
information.
The Commission generally felt that road improvements need to catch up to existing and
planned traffic needs before Phase IV 2015 development occurs. More specifically CR
15, Boutwell and decision on Neal design needs to be made before discussing Phase IV
annexation occurs.
To that end, a new land use Recommendation #3 was added (see page 10). Also,
Figure 3 and 6 were revised to show a Neal Avenue/Northland connection as
recommended by the Boutwell Area Transportation Study and Planning Commission.
As called for in the Orderly Annexation Agreement, Joint Board review is a public
hearing. The Boutwell South Area Plan must be approved by both the Joint Planning
Board and City Council before it is finally approved as a guide for development in the
Boutwell South Area.
Recommendation: Decision on Boutwell South Area Plan.
Attachments: Revised Boutwell South Area Plan, June 2004.
. Joint Board Action 8-25-04. Approved 4-0
Memo
.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
J oint Board
Steve Russell, Community Development Director rz-.
July 17,2002
Boutwell South Area Plan
The Boutwell South Area Plan was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at
their meeting of July 8, 2002. The Commission held several public meetings during the Spring
identifying issues considering alternative and effect of alternatives.
The plan is enclosed. Summarizing, the plan designates vacant areas, single family low density,.
existing developed areas remain rural residential (Figure #3). Neal Avenue is extended from
Boutwell to CR 12 between Northland Avenue and Maryknoll (Figure 3). The Commission felt
strongly that the Neal Avenue extension should not intersect directly with Northland or
Maryknoll.
.
Trail locations are designated through the area connecting to exiting and proposed trails and a
concept plan for stormwater management is proposed (Figure #5). The concept of Neal Parkway
design (Figure #6) is provided to combine the drainage, design, traffic and trail aspect of the
plan.
A related improvement studied in the plan was the intersection ofCR 12 and Boutwell. Several
design options were studied for that intersection.
The plan is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan requiring Joint Board approval. A related
issue to the plan adoption is the pemut allocation limit of 120 units per year.
Recommendation: Review and comment on Planning Commission recommended plan.
Attachments: Planning Commission staff reports, letters of comments and Boutwell South Area
Plan.
.
(
I
.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
June 17,2002
South of Boutwell Area Plan
o
Tonight's meetil!g is the third Planning Commission public meeting on the Boutwell South Area
Plan. The public hearing tonight is to review the draft plan with the intention of recommending
the plan to the Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board and the City Council for adoption.
Background:
The Boutwell South Area is part of the City of Stillwater's Comprehensive Plan Expansion Area
(see attached expansion area proposed land use plan). The area is a part of the Phase IV
expansion area scheduled for annexation and development after 2015.
. With the exception of the Public Works Facility, Boutwell Cemetery and Rutherford Cemetery,
the remainder of the study area is currently designated Rural Residential as a holding zone for
future development. The Draft South of Boutwell Area Plan designates most of the vacant areas
single family/low density (2-3 du's/acre).
The Comprehensive Trail Plan shows trails along Boutwell, connecting Boutwell to CR 12 in
two locations and along Spring Creek and the intersection ofCRS 12/15 to the proposed
Boutwell Cemetery Park.
Several road alignments connecting Neal Avenue to CR 12 were considered. The recommneded
alignment is an offset alignment intersecting wioaT Boutwell east of Neal Avenue and connecting
withCR 12 between Maryknoll and Northland. The proposed connecting road incorporates the
design elements of trails, greenways and wetlands to create a green roadway design.
Besides land use and traffic, drainage is an area of concern. With the proposed residential land
use, additional runoffwill be generated and have to be managed in a way that protects Brown's
Creek. The draft plan has tried to anticipate land use impacts and proposed conceptual drainage
designs that will accommodate the increased drainage.
The draft plan before the Commission, is the result ofthe existing conditions and issues reports
and discussions held at the Planning Commission meetings of March 11 and April 8.
.
\
Tonight, the plan is presented for comment, consideration and recommended for adoption. When .
adopted, the plan will provide a guide for future development ofthe South of Boutwell Planning
Area.
Re.commendation: Review and approval of South of Boutwell Area Plan (resolution).
Attachment: Draft South of Boutwell Area Plan
.
.
.:
.
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
July 8, 2002
10. No vehicle connection between Parkwood Lane and CR 5.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. CPAl02-02 A Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use
designation of Outlot B, long lake Estates, located on Stillwater Blvd frotrl
Attached Single Family to Business Park Commercial (BP-C). Mike O'Brien, Real
Estate Masters, representing Jennings State Bank, applicant.
Community Development Director Russell gave an overview of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Art Junker of 1164 Parkwood Lane, requested clarification on hours of operation
and the land use.
.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve
Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use designation of Outlot B, long Lake
estates. Located on Stillwater Boulevard from Attached Single Family to Business Park
Commercial. Motion passed unanimously. .
\
Case No. ZAM/02-02 A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Outlot B, long lake
Estates, from Town House (TH) to Business Park Commercial (BP-C). Mike
O'Brien, Real Estate Masters, representing Jennings State Bank, applicant.
Community Development Director Russell gave an overview of the Zoning Map
Amendment.
Motion made by Commissioner' Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Bealka to
approve Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Outlot B, long Lake Estates, from
Townhouse to Business Park Commercial. Motion passed unanimously.
Consideration of South of Boutwell Area Plan {continued from 6/17/02 public
hearing). . .
Additional traffic information was presented to the Commission in order to make
a decision about South of Boutwell Area Plan.
.
Sherri Buss reviewed traffic information that was gathered by Engineer Sheldon
Johnson. Sheldon Johnson believes that the Neal Extension will disperse the
traffic amount evenly.
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
July 8, 2002
.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Wald todirect
Sherri Buss and Community Developmeht Director Russell to approve all aspects of the
South of Boutwell Area Plan and to direct the Neal Extension between Northland and
Maryknoll, with a secondary option to improve Boutwell. Motion passed unanimously.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Peroceshi to.
adjourn the meeting at 10:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Bobbi J. Ward
Recording Secretary
.
.
7
"'"
.
.
.
City of Stillwater
and
Town Joint Board
July 24,2002
Chairperson Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:10 pm.
Present:
Town Board Members Dave Johnson, Ken LaBoda, City Council Members
Terry Zoller, Mayor Jay Kimble Community Development Director Russell,
City Attorney David Magnuson, Public Works Director Klayton Eckles
Others:
County Engineer Joe Lucx
Absent:
Council Member Wally Milbrandt
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion made by Council Member Zoller, seconded by Mayor Kimble to approve the
June 21,2001 minutes. Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. CPAl02-02 A comprehensive plan amendment changing land use
designation of 1.65 acres of land located betweenCR 5 and Parkwood Lane and
south of Wildpines from Attached Single Family to Business Park Commerical.
Tim Nolde, applicant.
The Planning Commission first reviewed the request for the Comprehensive
Amendment and Zoning Amendment at the April 8, 2002 meeting. At the April 8,
2002 meeting, there were several concerns brought forward including traffic,
parking, cost of utility improvements, building design, value of the project, the
impact commercial use would have on the residential area on the west.
Community Development Director Russell briefly went over the comprehensive
plan amendment.
Motion made by Mayor Kimble, seconded be Town Board Member LaBoda to approve
CPAl02-02. Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. ZAM/02-02 A zoning map amendment changing zoning from Townhouse
Residential, TH to Business Park Commercial, BP-C located between CR 5 and
Parkwood Lane and south of Wild pines. Jennings Bank, applicant.
Community Development Director Russell briefly went over the zoning map
amendment.
1
City of Stillwater and Town Joint Board
July 24,2002
.
Motion made by Mayor Kimble, seconded by Town Board Member LaBoda to approve
ZAM/02-02. Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. PUD/02-50 Long lake Estates mixed use, commercial/residential
Planned Unit Development located between CR 5 and Parkwood Lane south of
Wild pines. Jennings Bank and Tim Nolde, applicant.
Mr. Nolde and Roger Tomten reviewed the PUD for Long Lake Estates.
Vicki Johnson, 1132 Parkwood Lane voiced her concerns about safety. Ms.
Johnson inquired about having a traffic survey done at the corner of Parkwood
and Wild pines. Ms. Johnson is in favor of the Bank. The Board acknowledged
her concerns, but a traffic study is a different issue.
Michelle Sime, 1144 Parkwood Lane was also concerned about safety.
questioned the about of townhouse units, placement of the pond and
possible problems with snow removal.
Motion made by Council Member Zoller, seconded by Mayor Kimble to approve
PUD/02-50, Long lake Estates mixed use, commercial/residential Planned Unit
Development located between CR 5 and Parkwood Lane south of Wild pines with the
following conditions:
.
1.
The park dedication requirement for the townhouse subdivision shall be provided
wit subdivision approval.
A CR 5 access permit shall be obtained from Washington County for the
proposed driveways.
Fencing, landscaping, berming, retaining walls shall be used along the perimeter
of the drive though driveway to screen headlights from adjacent residential area.
The final design for the bank building shall be reviewed based on the
architectural and site design guideline.
The City Engineer shall review the drainage plan to ensure ponding requirements
are met.
Drainage, utility and trail easements shall be provided with the subdivision on
final PUD approval.
The detailed townhouse plans shall be reviewed by the fire department for
access requirements regarding road width.
A monument sign made of materials consistent with the bank building shall be
allowed rather than the 20' pylon sign. A building sign indicating the name of the
bank over the main entry may also be allowed.
Heritage Preservation Commission conditions of approval are added as
conditions of this approval.
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
2
.
.
~
.
.
City of Stillwater and Town Joint Board
July 24, 2002
10. The site drainage plan shall be approved by Browns Creek Watershed District
before final plan approval.
11. The maximum height of the bank building shall be two levels and 40 feet.
12. A bank or similar professional office use shall be located on the commercial site.
13. No vehicle connection between CR 5 and Parkwood Lane.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. CPAl02-01 A comprehensive plan amendment for South Boutwell
Planning Area changing land use designations and establishing new street
locations, trails/parking and concept drainage plan. City of Stillwater, applicant.
Sheri Buss gave a brief overview of the South Boutwell Area Plan.
Town Board Member LaBoda and Town Board Member Johnson believe the city
is taking a big risk with additional traffic issues when there is not a
comprehensive plan in place to fix the existing traffic issues.
p,~~~,)~fic~~,~I, Boutwell inquired about lower the speed limit to 35 mph on Myrtle
all the way Manning. Mr. Erickson also inquired about removing bridge over
drainage creek on Boutwell.
Richard and LaVerne Schultz, 13055 Boutwell voiced their concerns about
loosing some of their property because of the placement of the Neal Avenue
Extension.
Motion made by Town Board Member LaBoda, seconded by Council Member Zoller to
approve concept plan as a change to the Comprehensive Plan. Motion passed
unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Concept Plan review for CR 15/12 Liberty Village Commercial Plans - for
discussion only
The Board commended the work done so far. The Board would like to see the
development consistent with the existing development. The Board is also in favor
of mixed use and the creative parking solution.
3
City of Stillwater and Town Joint Board
July 24,2002
Update on permit allocation system
For the calendar year of 2002,228 building permits were issued for housing
units. The orderly annexation agreement allows building permits for 120 housing
units per year or 840.
With the approval of the Settlers Glen project permit activity may increase in
2002-2003.
Motion made by Mayor Kimble, seconded by Town Board Member LaBoda to adjourn
the meeting at 11 :15 pm. Motion passed unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Bobbi Ward
Recording Secretary
4
..
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
REVISED BOUTWELL SOUTH AREA PLAN
Joint Stillwater Township/City Planning Board Meeting.
August 25,2004
Jb I ~.l- />.v(
(k0
~-~.r- "'-DV.
I have reviewed the revised Boutwell South Area Plan and agree that there are many aspects of the
plan and its recommendations that are beneficial to the City of Stillwater and its current and
potential residents.
I am concerned about the three recommendations on pagel0.
B. Roadwavs
"Recommendation 3: Neal Avenue should be extended from Boutwell to Coun~y Road 12
and intersect County Road 12 at Northland.
Further study is necessary to ensure that Neal Traffic does not significantly impact the
Croixwood neighborhood. Because the land on the north side of CR 12 across from
Northland is not in the City and this property owner is not currently interested in annexing to
the City it may be some time before the street improvement is possible."
"Recommendation 4: The Boutwell-County Road 12 intersection should be studied with the
extension of Neal Avenue." .
A. Land Use
"Recommendation 3: ... The Planning Commission continues to recommend that Neal
A venue be extended from Boutwell Road and connected at Northland A venue. They
continue to have concerns for allowing discretionary Phase IV development before Manning
A venue and Boutwell Road improvements are made."
All of these recommendations indicate that the Neal Avenue extension requires further study before
any recommendation as to where and how it is incorporated into the Boutwell area development.
With improvements to Manning Avenue and expected traffic signals, much of the Neal
A venue traffic north of Boutwell Road and in the new Bergman addition could be directed
to Manning Avenue, which is the preferred collector road.
The new traffic patterns these changes may generate could have a significant affect on how
the Neal Avenue Parkway is designed. Many of the issues driving the need to connect Neal
Avenue to CR 12 may disappear or modify how the connection is made.
Further studies should follow these changes along Manning A venue. Recommendations as
to the Neal Avenue Parkway should come after these changes not precede them.
The Land Use Recommendation 3 that states the "Annexation and development of lands in the
South of Boutwell Planning area should not occur until the specific Neal A venue connection .
location and design has been determined."
"
I believe that this recommendation should not be part of the annexation plan.
It is unfair to restrict the developers from continuing with their plans until the Neal A venue
. connection issue has been resolved. (A road stub could be built into the development plans
should a connection be made in the future.)
It is unfair to force a connection that may have significant negative impacts on Croixwood
neighborhoods simply to allow the developer to build. The traffic movement issues may be
resolved by other means still to be studied or developed. There are still unresolved issues
from the Boutwell Area Transportation Study prepared by SRF and attached to this plan.
It is contrary to the City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan (1995-2020) which indicated that
there was "A major concern [of] the immediate access from Neal Avenue into the
Croixwood development via Northland Avenue." It further went on by creating "Policy 8:
The city shall make every effort feasible to assure that through traffic is diverted from
residential streets to arterials."
It is premature to tie the Neal Avenue connection to the annexation when there are no
preliminary cost estimates on the improvements suggested for the connection. Due to
potential costs to the City of Stillwater and Washington County, what is being proposed may .
not be affordable and we may be locked into a less than desirable connection. .
During the April 20, 2004 City of Stillwater City Council Meeting, the decision to connect
Neal Avenue to CR 12 was table for future study. As far as I know, that study has not been
completed.
Because of these unresolved issues, I request that the Land Use: Recommendation 3 not be
included in any motion to annex the South Boutwell Area Plan.
Respectfully submitted by:
Gail Pundsack
140 Northland Avenue
.
I
.
.
.
&
8BRUGGEMAN PROPERTIES
Building Communities Since 1959
September 13, 2004
City of Stillwater Mayor Jay Kimble
Council Member David Junker
Council Member John Rheinberger
Council Member Wally Milbrandt
Council Member Gary Kriesel
RE: September 21, 2004, City Council Meeting
Public Hearing Comments- Boutwell South Area Plan
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bruggeman Properties, LLC has reviewed the Boutwell South Area Plan and recommends the
following modification to the plan.
Requested Action:
· We recommend that the City of Stillwater Council approve the Boutwell South Area Plan with
the provision that landowners with existing properties in the study area adjacent to the city be
allowed to immediately annex into the City of Stillwater (modification to "Recommendation #3"
pg. 10 of June 2004 plan is required to address this issue). We can then work with the city on
a residential design that meets the cities plans, ordinances and guidelines.
Bruggeman properties would like to summarize several important points regarding the Boutwell South
Area Plan and the associated traffic studies:
Background:
1. Bruggeman Properties LLC owns an 18 acre parcel of land located north of CSAH 12, south
of Boutwell Road, north and east of Neal Avenue.
2. In the year 2000 Bruggeman Properties proposed a development in the subject area.
Bruggeman Properties was under the assumption that we could. successfully petition the City
of Stillwater for annexation as City orderly annexation policies allow landowners in areas
adjacent to the existing city limits to petition for annexation (Boutwell South Area Plan, Sept
2002 pg. 3).
3. On January 10, 2000 Bruggeman Properties submitted a petition for annexation and paid the
$2000 fee. It is our recollection that the petition received unanimous approval from the
Stillwater Planning Commission and the Stillwater Joint Board. Shortly thereafter we
purchased the property.
4. The project was delayed as the City of Stillwater opted to do a study of the Boutwell South
Area, a neighborhood within the Stillwater Annexation Area. On December 6, 2001
Bruggeman Properties agreed to, and has contributed thousands of dollars towards this study.
L:\Projects\Stillwater\#-Boutwell\Public Hearing Info\Council091304Ltr.doc
3564 ROLLING VIEW DRIVE. WHITE BEAR LAKE. MINNESOTA 55110 . 651-770-2981 . FAX 651-770-9273
\
\
5. In September of 2002 the Report for the "Boutwell South Area Plan" was published by
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates.
6. FOllOwing the Plan, a second traffic study was ordered and conducted. This traffic study was
prepared by SRF Consulting and published on November 12,2003. Both studies have
concluded that Boutwell has adequate capacity to handle the projected development.
7. The Stillwater Pianning Commission and Council have been deliberating on the Boutwell
South Area Plan and traffic study since that time.
.
Summary of Our Proposal:
A. Our proposed development plan is consistent with the recommendations found in the Boutwell
South Area Plan, published in 2002. We propose to develop the site with twin town homes,
and stand prepared to meet the proposed Low Density Single Family land use density of 3
units per acre as identified in the Plan.
B. The 2002 Plan indicates that the project area totaling 120 acres would generate up to 3,445
trips on area roads if the Boutwell South Planning Area were. built to maximum capacity. The
likelihood of this area to be developed at 3 units an acre is unlikely considering the numerous
existing rural large acreage lots located throughout this area. Our proposed project (18
acres) comprises only 15% of the entire Planning Area.
C. We propose to construct up-scale town homes on our property. Buyers of this product
predominantly are semi-retired adults who impose a lesser impact to roadways and
infrastructure when compared to owners of single family homes. Typical owners have very
few or no students attending school, have fewer occupants per household and maintain a
leisure schedule minimizing impacts to public infrastructure.
D. We propose to layout our site consistent with City Plans and Ordinances. We intend to orient .
our on-site roadway( s) to the west to anticipate a planned north.,.south. connection of Neal
Avenue (located to the north) to CSAH 12. Our sketch plan anticipates and dovetails nicely
into this planned north-south roadway connection.
E. Once we are annexed (fall of 2004) we will proceed with the necessary planning and
approvals with the City of Stillwater. Based on a typical development time line the earliest we
would have our town home products constructed and ready for sale would be late summer of
2005 or more realistically - spring of 2006. This gives the city ample time to plan and prepare
for roadway improvements if warranted~
Bruggeman Properties has been working diligently on this project with the City of Stillwater for over 5
years, spending an inordinate amount of time and money. Being property owners in this area we feel
that it is time to move forward; allowing us to annex into the City of Stillwater will facilitate this
objective.
If you have any questions please do not hesitative to contact me, we look forward to working with you
on this project. .
4 -;;:A -
Steven Fisher, AICP
Land Development Director
Cc: Paul Bruggeman
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
.
L:\Projects\Stillwater\#-Boutwel1\Public Hearing Info\Council091304Ltr.doc
.
REVISED BOUTWELL
SOUTH AREA ?LAN
June 2004
.
..
.
Table of Contents
o Executive SummarY .................................................. 2
o I. Project Summary.................................................... 3
o II. Existing Conditions and Issues............................. 4
o III. Planning Process.................................................. 8
o IV. Recommendations.............................................. 9
.
La n d Use ............................................................. 9
Roadways.......................................................... 10
Stormwater Management................................. 13
Integration of Stormwater and Circulation........ 17
Sewer and Water SeNices.................................. 17
o V. Implementation ................................................. 19
o Attachments........................................................ 21
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
1
.
Executive Summary
This plan provides recommendations for the Boutwell South
Planning Area, a neighborhood within the Stillwater Expansion
Area. The area is part of the Phase IV annexation area
scheduled for annexation after 2015. Areas within the
planning area can be annexed earlier if petitioned by property
owner(s) and determined to be of benefit by the City. The
Boutwell South Planning Area contains approximately 350
acres. The current land use is large lot rural residential and
vacant land.
The plan proposes that as the area becomes part of the City of
Stillwater, approximately 120 acres, a third of the area, be
developed as urban low-density single-family residential. The
proposed development areas are mostly in the eastern portion
of the Planning Area. The western portion of the area is
recommended to remain rural residential at this time with two
areas of exception located at the corner of CR 15 and CR 12
and CR 15 and Boutwell Road. The plan recommends that
road improvements (Neal, Boutwell, CR 15) be considered
before any Phase IV expansion development occur.
.
In addition to land use recommendations, the plan includes
recommendations for circulation, parks, trails and open space,
public utilities and storm water management. The plan
recommends that Neal Avenue be extended as a collector
parkway through the planning area and connect to CR 12 at
Northland Avenue and that trails be completed along creeks
and roadways to implement trail connections identified in the
City's Comprehensive Trail Plan. The plan calls for the City to
work with Washington County and the Croixwood
neighborhood in developing a specific design for the extension
of Neal Avenue. The County controls access to County Road
12, and has expressed concerns related to access
management and safety.
The plan analyzes development, traffic and stormwater
impacts from the South. Boutwell Area, and updates the
Stillwater Alternative Urban Areawide Review, AUAR, (1997)
for these issues.
The residents of the area, the Stillwater Planning Commission,
Washington County, and others participated actively in
developing this plan during the 2002 plan preparation process.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
2
.
Boutwell South Planning
Study
I. Project Summary
This plan provides a comprehensive planning framework that
will guide land use, development, circulation, storm water
management, parks, trails, greenways and other development
decisions in the Boutwell South Planning Area. Plan
preparation began in January 2002. In 2003, a
comprehensive traffic study for the city expansion area
provided additional information that is incorporated into this
final plan and used as a basis for land use recommendations.
The area contains slightly more than 350 acres in size, and is
bounded by Boutwell Avenue, County Road 15 (Manning
Avenue), and County Road 12. Most of the area is currently
located within Stillwater Township, and scheduled for
annexation to the City of Stillwater after 2015. Figure 1
identifies the boundaries of the planning area and shows
existing conditions.
.
The City of Stillwater's Comprehensive Plan (1995) identified
the majority of land use in the Boutwell South Planning Area
as "rural residential" through 2015. The Alternative Urban
Areawide Review (AUAR) for the annexation area assumed
rural residential land use in the Boutwell South area when it
analyzed the environmental impacts of proposed development
in the Annexation Area, and developed the mitigation plan to
address these impacts. Both the 1995 Comprehensive Plan
and AUAR assumed that no urban services would be provided
in the area before 2015.
However, since 1995 several property owners in the Boutwell
South area expressed interest in annexing to the City and
developing their land at urban densities before 2015. City
orderly annexation policies allow landowners in areas adjacent
to the existing city limits to petition for early annexation. One
landowner interested in annexation is located at the corner of
Manning Avenue and County Road 12; another is located
south of Newberry Court (see Figure 1). Other landowners in
the Boutwell South area expressed interest in annexation
during this planning study.
.
The Boutwell South Area Plan is prepared to coordinate and
guide land use, zoning, parks, trails, circulation systems,
public utilities and storm water management in the area when
development occurs. Once adopted, the City will consider
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
3
.
individual property owner requests for annexation and change
in land use based on this overall plan. The plan also reviews
the environmental impacts identified in the AUAR, analyzes
the potential impacts of the proposed land use and utility plans
for the area, and discusses possible mitigation strategies.
II. Existing Conditions and Issues
Initially, the City's Planning Staff, consultants and Planning
Commission met with plan area residents and Washington
County Public Works to review existing conditions and identify
issues to be considered in developing the area plan. Issues
identified are listed below:
Roadwavs, Streets. and Trails
.
. Mannina Avenue (County Road 15). Washington
County's current Capital Improvement Plan identifies
reconstruction of Manning Avenue from Trunk Highway
36 to CSAH 12 in 2007. This project will include a four-
lane roadway, traffic signals a bike/pedestrian trail on
the Stillwater side of the road. The County controls
access to CR 15, including driveways and new streets.
There is no timeframe for upgrading Manning Avenue
to a 4-lane roadway north of County 12 to TH 96.
County staff indicated that the earliest time for this
upgrade is 2008.
.
. Neal Avenue. The City is considering options to
connect Neal Avenue with County Road 12. Issues
related to this proposal include the following:
o Improvement of the existing Boutwell
Road/County Road 12 intersection.
o Access to Boutwell Avenue homes east of Neal.
o The existing steep grade on County Road 12 at
Maryknoll makes sight lines difficult for locating
a new intersection east of Northland Avenue.
o The County has purchased the access rights of
CSAH 12 right of way between Boutwell Road
and Manning Avenue. (Openings exist to
accommodate existing private driveways and
streets.) Access spacing standards and need
for turn lanes will be considered in the design of
any proposed Neal Avenue connection.
o. A variety of options for the new Neal Avenue
route were studied. Each has potential traffic
and land use impacts as described in attached
Expansion Area Traffic Study.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
4
.
"'"
_:::~.\'::J:J -.;J: .=:r1 :}! ?r "j~:).l-.IC:= ~1: 1rrr?_"~ '.: .' ....
"
'.1
M8
11ft)
[~~
-~ Q
~"'<
<r.1ie
~~~g
t~~~
~.~~
~Y~g
~~ 0
~bd!:)-
~!:s?it=
F~~
tG<...,.
G!=l~)
L~-I-' t
fi.~I='~
rJ"'''fll;
i.~~fi?
_:J<'::J' C!-
.
'~if:=r~e.' s:; ::-:rvL:::;s
o 250
I~-
S~to In loot
500
--t
~ ~
~ ~ p.H
5; 0 c <:'
-'~
~~ .. ~ _ _ .. -~ -- -... ....
;_'~~':i'/'4f~*I';~/\'f~'~5:". .~::.~:'..~... ~I,..;:..,.'i";'
~,r.'" ~ '7-.-,....1 L,.- -;, "_-,! J
.1 :-:-:-":of: .~-;~..). .,.1 [- --, If It_~iJ+ il
~. ~.r;- -- :....,6-.l.J .. ~ l ..!..... -~ '-I ... 2 ~ tj
.~..... ~"'l ~~- ~ t. -1'-' '---;4
.,---.,..1 . j
"'I." :,
vt
~-~ '.:.:~-r1'9C~:'~'i'-:":":'J";5-~"~ :"f)..::::
t
-.
.~
I
~..
- ..
D-
"..
~
8~g
Hi
~~E
r.;
:> ..
r,",
~~~
i~~
B~
g - .
. ~.~~. i
~:~
t=;
.,)0.:,--
QiE
".
~-
-
>i
..,
. "
,
~,
'... jI
nO'
,
,
r
.1
o C3' l:
~ ~1:
tl ~=t:1
QJQJQJc
CUlU\l
o ~ C (j
Ci).~~"
~.~
~.~
~
,...
-
'"
.,J
-
-.J
)
r. J.
"""
__ c
.,J
~~-i-; ~- f?( . - \~ -, '/-
.;-~.,=-_[Ul11rTJ''- '.?:ie':'1 112 :.~~ ~ h~~ ,:;.....
:;\. '1 c---:a \~"-;=50,-:-"-
~lr " U ="~ J~&- q
\t' 0 /~c' \-1 IR ::r 9~'1eS'~ '?<Drr
o /,:? <o;:,~ ~
o b~ ~~>ti ~ 1: C-.flg
<:~~ to, ~\
- , ~
\ < ~~~
\ ~~
\ I
Goo I
I
,
~..~:=,="~~_~__' I
-; 11= - - - ':~:- -;Jfl -
~i~: : ((
I~ .. fb 0
, i~.. ~'~; .. .. ~i~i r
~ 1 {.- ~ ~I ~ ~
j".t UV' ., kLJ ..J
~
\, ii~'~ ..._,-
Prr<C>>LO(Q)se(Q] ID~V(2~([i:('l:r.'l']1 f!.0J ~
>(
."L
o
"-) -=- fY Ot~
\ /\\ ~e'{, /!jJ,
...... , r JW)~) "\- i". J~
~'~-;: \ ~ iffi~~Y ,;1-
, "./ \:..-' ho<-6 OJ ",/"
Jv r~.~ j" 1/-
~; ~',,\V~l )'b G fl."
. ' u ~ 'J ~,,::,. iL/ ll!
\ ~'.N ilf
\....~....,,-....-r"'-_ .......J L~:~;~
. ....' -'.'--JI" . ..;/"
5( G\%. ;;L~ ~:~:~.
\ \~\'" /' 0.:'::11"00 ~~
~ ~l\./rl ~ ,:v 0 oO~[i! I.~.:
?~"f~~~;
,./
'""
-.
.....
o 0
00 00
-
-
Pfi'([)~: t .:;fi'[fi) t'1r~efi'sec~nO;lJ
~
~
=
00 0
o
v'
\
.
o
o
o 00 C
)
"'
.>'
6?l if!
f])
~ d
~ ~
=
. 0
-~
-..." ::-;.
-.J CJ
"
---
--
-~ .,.
~ ~
..
.
o Residents in the area are concerned about
potential traffic impacts of connecting Neal
Avenue to residential streets in Croixwood to
the south of County Road 12.
o Residents expressed concerns about increased
traffic on_ Boutwell, Minar and other local streets
. . due to the Settler's Glen Development north of
the Boutwell South planning area.
o Residents expressed concern for speeds on
County Road 12, and would like the State
Commissioner of Transportation to reduce the
speed limit on this road.
o Boutwell Road residents expressed concerns
for condition, pedestrian conflict and speeds of
travel on Boutwell Road since Settlers Glen
Development.
o The Boutwell Road, CR 12 intersection is
difficult and access from Boutwell Road to
Manning Avenue experience delays.
o Concern was expressed for the traffic impact on
Neal Avenue of Phase III (Palmer Development
Property).
. Existina Traffic. Many residents expressed frustration
concerning existing poor circulation in the area, and the
potential for these problems to worsen with additional
development. They also expressed concerns that a
Neal connection near Maryknoll Road or Northland
Avenue would route unacceptable volumes of traffic
onto residential streets in the Croixwood area.
. Trails. The City's Comprehensive Trail Plan identifies
a number of existing and proposed trails within and
around the study area. Issues for the planning study
include:
o Creating good pedestrian connections through
the study area linking the proposed trails.
o Provide trail access to natural areas for
enjoyment of natural areas while connecting to
existing trails in the area.
o Residents on the west side of the planning area
expressed concern for trails along their property
lines. .
.
Stormwater Manaaement and Wetlands,
.
. Stormwater manaaement. The AUAR proposed that
stormwater in the Annexation Area (including the
Boutwell South area) be diverted away from Brown's
Creek to protect the designated trout stream and
associated resources. The City is currently
constructing this diversion system. Land use changes
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
5
.
proposed for the Boutwell South Area could increase
the rate and volume of stormwater runoff from this area
beyond the level identified in the AUAR. Related
issues include the following:
o The AUAR proposed storm water ponding in
several existing basins in the.South Boutwell
Area to manage runoff. The size of tnese
ponds may need to De increased, or other
storm water management strategies required if
land use changes in the area.
o An impact fee is being assessed to new
development in the Annexation Area to pay for
the cost of the stormwater diversion would be
assessed to new development in the Boutwell
South area.
o Storm water facilities in the area could be
designed to serve as amenities for development
in the area, and provide multiple benefits such
as open space, buffers among land uses, and
trail corridors.
o Ponds to manage runoff will be required for all
new development.
.
. Wetland Buffers. The Brown's Creek Watershed
District requires that 150' undisturbed vegetative
buffer$ be established along the Brown's Creek
tributaries and wetlands in this area. This will affect the
size and configuration of developable areas.
Land Use
.
. Existina Land Use. Much of the Boutwell South area is
currently occupied by large lot single family residences.
Many of these residents indicated that they plan to
maintain this large lot development pattern for the.
foreseeable future. Issues related to the future land
use in the area include the following:
o Identify appropriate long-term land use
designations in the Boutwell South area.
o Evaluatewhich land use(s) would pe
compatible with existing development in the
area, and identify needs for buffers or
separation between some land use types.
o Evaluate which land uses are compatible with
roadways and storm water infrastructure
capacity available for the area.
o Identify an appropriate land use transition from
the city limits going westward
o Existing residents in the area expressed strong
concerns about increased densities proposed
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
6
.
for the area. Many were opposed to any
change in land use designations before 2015.
Single family housing compatible with existing
homes in the area was preferred over attached
housing.
. Parks and ooen soace. Additional open space and
neighborhood park areas should be identified in the
Boutwell South area as development occurs. Open
space areas may also be designed and located to
serve storm water management functions and provide
transitions between land uses. Open space corridors
and trails in the South Boutwell areas should connect
with those in surrounding areas.
. Phasina issues. The City has a limit of 120 new
residential permits per year within the entire annexation
area. The timing of new development in the Boutwell
South area may be affect by these limits.
.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
7
.
III. Planning Process
The development of the plan included meetings with affected
parties, including city residents in and around the planning
area, the City's Planning Commission, City-Township Joint
Board, Washington County Public Works Staff, and the City
Council. The plan was also reviewed by the Brown's Creek
Watershed District.
The final plan being presented for approval has incorporated
the results and approved recommendations from the
Expansion Area Traffic Study as they related to the Boutwell
South Planning Area.
Discussions included the following:
.
. Planning Commission and Public Input. The City's
Planning Commission considered the plan at four
meetings, including a public hearing on April 8, 2002.
A large number of residents from the Boutwell South
planning area and surrounding neighborhoods
attended these meetings and identified their issues and
concerns. Issues discussed at these meetings are
listed in the previous section. The plan includes the
Commission's recommendations regarding land use, .
stormwater management, public utilities, circulation,
and overall design.
. City-Township Joint Board. The Joint Board
reviewed the draft plan and Planning Commission
recommendations on July 24, 2002. The discussion
and comments focused on roadway and land use
issues.
. Washington County, City staff and consultants met
with staff from the Washington County Physical
Development Department several times during the
planning process to discuss issues related to roadways
and trails. County concerns and recommendations are
described in Section IV, and copies of letters received
from the County are included in the Attachments.
. City Council. On September 13, 2004, the City
Council held a public hearing on the plan. At that
meeting, traffic impact of study area development on
Deerpath was identified as a concern for the study. A
separate expansion area traffic study was then
conducted. The results of that traffic study has been
incorporated into this plan. Major new policies deal
with Deerpath/Brick and Neal Avenue.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
8
.
IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell
South Planning Area
A. Land Use
Recommendation 1: Figure 2 identifies proposed land
uses for the Boutwell South Area. Land use for the
eastern portion of the planning area is designated urban
low-density single family (3 DU's per net developable
acre)1. Most of the existing Rural Residential land use
areas in the western half of the Area are maintained in
rural residential use, with densities of one unit per 2.5
acres. Two areas, corner of County 15 and County 12,
and County 15 and Boutwell Avenue are designated Low
Density Single Family.
Recommendation 2: Development proposals for the area
should be in the form of Planned Unit Developments to
provide flexibility in project design and design review.
.
The areas identified for Low-density Single Family land use
will extend existing land uses from the City Limits to Long Lake
Creek that bisects the planning area from north to south. . The
creek corridor will provide a transition between new land uses
and the existing larger-lot areaS to the west. While the
proposed land use designation is a higher density than the
existing Rural Residential land uses, it is a relatively low urban
density and should be compatible with existing uses to the
west of the creek. The new low-density single-family areas
should also be compatible with existing urban developed areas
to the east.
Two areas identified for Low-density Single Family are located
at the western corners of the planning area. These areas are
adjacent to CR 15 at CR 12 and Boutwell Road. The two sites
are adjacent Setters Glen and Liberty commercial.
The designation of the land uses will allow for a range of
housing types and help the City to meet its housing goals.
Low- density Single Family development may include either
clustered attached and single lot detached single-family
housing.
The proposed densities allows for "clustering" of units on sites
to protect natural resources.
.
1 Net developable land equals total acreage minus roads,
wetlands and steeply sloped area
City of Stillwater- Boutwell South Area Plan
9
J!- --y: li; ~'A l
I I I J Land Use
, -III
--~
I I I I ~
L-
1--
\ -
.
. I I
2.01
:J'-
I
L 16.923
D City Public Works Facility
D Park / Open Space / Cemetery
D Rural Residential
Ili::~1 Single Family / Low Density
800
o
800
L
Feet
--
~
-~
~
~
~
Boutwell South Planning Area
Proposed Land Uses and Acreage
j f1 j Bonestroo
e Rosene
~ AnderJik &
. \J. Associates
Engineers & Architects
Figure 2
\510\51 0011 09\cad\gis~use.apr June 2002
.
The distribution and amount of land designated for each land
use type in the Boutwell South Area is as follows:
Rural Residential (1 DU/2.5 AC) 167 acres
. Single Family, Low-density (3 DU/Net Ac) 120 acres
. Parks/open space/wetlands 48 acres
City (Public Works Bldg.) 17 acres.
TOTAL 352 acres
Recommendation 3: Annexation and development of
lands in the South of Boutwell Planning area should not
occur until a specific Neal A venue connection location
and design has been determined. The Planning
Commission continues to recommend that Neal Avenue
be extended from Boutwell Road and connected at
Northland A venue. They continue to have concerns for
allowing discretionary Phase IV development before
Manning A venue (Washington County) and Boutwell Road
improvements are made.
B. Roadwavs
.
Recommendation 3: Neal A venue should be extended
from Boutwell to County Road 12 and intersect County
Road 12 at Northland.
Further study is necessary to ensure that Neal traffic does not
significantly impact the Croixwood neighborhood. Because
the land on the north side of CR 12 across from Northland is
not in the City and this property owner is not currently
interested in annexing to the City it may be some time before
the street improvement is possible.
It is further recommended that Neal Avenue between Boutwell
and CR12, it be designed as a parkway with landscaped
median, larger building setbacks and trails. The street should
be designed to fit into the landscape with gradual turns with
access to local streets. The road design could also
incorporate stormwater management measures.
Washington County strongly supports a Neal connection to CR
12 at Northland for traffic management reasons (Washington
County controls access to CR 12 and have purchased access
rights along that stretch of road).
.
Recommendation 4 : The Boutwell-County Road 12
intersection should be studies with the extension of Neal
Avenue.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
10
.
Possible improvements include turn control. The expansion
area transportation plan recommended limiting left turn
movements from Boutwell to Cr 12 when Neal is connected to
CR 12.
Boutwell Road
The City of Stillwater has scheduled improvements for
Boutwell Road to be completed by 2005, including a new 26'
roadway and trail in the existing right of way. The complete
Expansion Area Transportation Study is attached along with
the City Council recommendations.
Traffic Analvsis
The new Low-density Single Family land use areas proposed
in this plan could generate up to 3,445 total daily trips on area
roads, if the .120 acres are fully developed at the maximum 3
units per net developable acre.
.
The number of trips would be well within the capacity of
existing area roadways, particularly when Manning Avenue
(County 15) is upgraded, and planned improvements have
been completed to Boutwell Road. County 15 in this area
currently carries nearly 14,000 trips on an average weekday.
Washington County noted that the combination of new traffic
from the Boutwell South Area with new traffic from the Settler's
Glen development north of Boutwell may create traffic
problems and delays at intersections (Boutwell/Manning and
County 12/Manning). The County has indicated that a new
traffic signal at the County 12/Manning intersection is likely,
though no specific plan has been proposed (the project may
be constructed in 2006). During discussions related to this
plan, the County indicated that it may consider addition of a
traffic signal at the Boutwell/County Road 15 intersection as
well, subject to the standards of the County's Traffic Signal
Ranking System and its cost participation policies.
.
. County 15 will be the focus of many of the work and shopping-
related trips from the new residential areas. The City will
construct a new Frontage Road (extension of Curve Crest
Boulevard) from the intersection of County 15 and 62nd Street,
parallel to Highway 36, to the Curve Crest intersection at
County 5, as development occurs in the area along Highway
36. This will provide a convenient connection for residents
from the Settler's Glen and Boutwell South Areas to this retail
area. (See map Concept Plan for 62nd Street Frontage Road
in the Attachm~nts.)
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
11
-
,~
,Q
6
F
.\1\
/ 0
~
:~
z'
, -
:oz,
; -0'
iI '
~i
J
::z
~
)"
,~
~.
l~
\ -(
., ~
\~
~
t~
.
~.
I .1
"~
-zt~
It
i~
): ~
,~ i
~
.
w .2...
1. ~
~ r'
It\ ~.
j ~...
f .;.c,
~
-'~
~
('
';0
"j
(),
i
.
/'.
-
,
~Le'.
-:r'\
l.-S:::\
"
~
~
<J
3f.V... ...... . .
.
.
.
or 1 ION 4~.
. ~~lrN ~~u., I>>~N I\T to.P-D.I2.
.--kDo 1\t>''DtTV~.J1(v ~ + ~ VFtNe? eN
~. f"Y). . 12 AT ~6VTW~u.,
· ~rJ~~T ~ffM?'~L.k'r.
. ,:'. .. '-'~:f.~' ; '. :....~
~.:.'..i\ .~~& F=-=:;,."
~-:.Y;. v....
~
-
a
-
'.
'.
~
.
:;:
.
q
H-
.r:::. Ci1' M A
r \ \V "\
1.1" 6.' 'tt>~~:
. 1... .. ...,
. ,
,/
.'
OpntN #
-
· ~ b1" 1?oawav Kr
. ~w-3'r1 fP 1'2..... ..
. .... .. .~E:
· ':!rPD...WFr.;1"PN '.' . ~.,
(ftN ~cf crit ttivo . ~ L-
/(f N..e.. ~6;!-
~.
"
..". .
~~;f-$d..~.:Pt'~ ";i<;;;;:f;f.;.', ,';,:','r:: ;:. to. .~:::-::.. i _,'i:~":."~'::'" ':''-r~'<~!:l~'''','','''''r.:<:'!:.:.:::z;.,":;l:~--;''.,:-,;~~,,,,,,::,;
11L1n L om 0 N
-"~~"'--:-}~-::-r~?-: ~~"':~~;'?~.':_..~\~J...~.~
.- .
4b.
'"'-'----~. . '.. .......... ." , "...... ~...,~
~~~~~~~~. ni'<M"; ~:...:.,~!-. ..,~...~~t.,~~.:.-",,.~,,,,_...;~,,,~~J'"~~::!~~'~~.(~~;A......~)#:::..,:...,~1t.:;;i:;;;o.'.:u:>::;&.~:.t.~Ft.
-- ~..:.:=:- ~.jI'4':t?"'..-:T"~~("~:t'l.i'F#....:""""",,""".".' .'. .:.... _ . __
. ~ON 1-f.;
.~ ______1:>rvvrwr;U" O'fn\)N
. '.;.. /QA.(:;JNn~1
".
1. ot. 1...
1l2A1L
~
.' .
.
W1t>E. ~~t>~ Wl11-\ -nJP-N lA'rNE:.?
.,,:...
-
~ \...)~:.~....
'!Y-... ..;.-:~~~..;~:,.,: .
-"ii"-"CI-.' .....,. -;0,.
':.".: ij!. tt:t~~....~~~<;t".J .... ....
~~ . .._~,. .;".....~
.. . \. .~. ...~.,:.1i.~ ..--~
~ . ~.---
--- -
-
-
---
- .._--.-. - ~:.
, &..c'1..~~~~..-e.~~~~:!.~~~!~~%~",".~i-:t;~~::-~!;~~~..~:.
.... .., .....-.".~... " 'lo""~ ~:""7........, ":;.....:.
--:e..... . ~ .... ';;:'A~"~ )1.;; 1'~ '.. 0'..
-.
..
--
'1
11tA1 L
-
-
..-- .....
.....
. .....-..._._..-~....-....
,
....,. ....,""'...:.:-...,.-........ ...
.-~ .fJ... ...;^_
,"
...
. ....OZ...
'....J'""1o .
.
(p liON 4
'--
'~)<.\~llN&j
.., .........:...... ._.._......)':Ilo:..~~-~-;:;:;;;;;r"._~.;....... .:.,~.~_..
-. I', . ..... .... ,q. ......-
.!N~?Bv-no"t-- 'J
...... ~
--
.. ",."',, ..,
;
,
I ,':.
. . I . '"
if! s:,
~:i ~.?
I~-.
..c:;:
,!~;
'""~:
,..=
. !:',$1.~
':':;:;~l
I '~~~i
.., ;:"'.-!
.~._}
~ ~=;ii
!c::;1
y:s:;
"'~.1i
~i=~
I C' ...~.e
I~=-('J
:~;l! .:
l"~:'= :r
-::""1.- -
IH~~ i
:'i 11 {
; ! ~ ~~
: I ji~
I . 'I :
. ..J 1:
i I Jh
! i ~:~
! ! i.1 ~
. ! ., ~ ~
: ... .to;'"
. ..,..
i ;:;
I -a".
. ... ~.;
I ~~~
. ';-:2.
~ :"
. i
"
~;
d
'"
. .
,
..... .:,or ....
p ;:::
t: ~~.!:
ci aJ ~,~
'c",t ~
C C c: ~;
c:: C' ~: <:
"'-:; u~=:
c::::11 11 _
""""'i)(1'-
~~
Icc.~
W"7 .
I rot....
I < -'"
~:Z
.:J.~.
. .
: t:: "\
. '~I
;l ~~'R :
'j .~ .
: . ,
1 ;0-
II-'
.-.
!(J
. .
! :
~
I
.t
. .
. r ~~.~~\
.
Trips that do not use County 15 will be dispersed among other
area roadways-primarily Boutwell Road and County 12 and
Deerpath and Brick Street (see attached Expansion Area
Traffic Study for comprehensive discussion of expansion area
traffic).
Trails
Recommendation 5: Trails should be developed in the
study area as shown on Figures 1 and 6, and include the
following:
. East side of Manning A venue
. North side of Boutwell Road
. South side of County Road 12 (existing)
. Brown's Creek tributaries, connecting with existing
trails to the Brown's Creek Open Space site and Long
Lake
. Proposed Neal Avenue connection.
.
Recommendation 6: An underpass should complete the
trail connection under County Road 12 near Northland
A venue. The underpass is proposed to allow a safe crossing
to the park and elementary school on the south side of County
Road 12. The exact location of the underpass will be
determined in the future, and will depend on potential
alteration of the grade of County Road 12 and soils in the
area, The County has indicated strong support for this
underpass (letter dated July 2, 2002).
Trails should be physically separated from roadways to
provide a safe and pleasant experience for trail users.
The route of an historic trolley route from Como Lake in St.
Paul to Stillwater is still visible within the study area, and in
other portions of Washington County. Consideration should
be given to preservation and use of this feature, particularly if it
can be used to make trail or habitat connections to other areas
within the County.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
12
.
c.
Stormwater Manaaement
Recommendation 7: The two existing landlocked
depressions within the planning area should be used to
provide flood control for the surrounding development
and moderate water leveffluctuations. Outlets are
recommended for both depressions. The City will require
developers to provide water quality ponds, use infiltration or
filtration strategies, or other feasible management strategies to
provide water quality treatment within local development sites
and to control volumes and rates of flow to protect the
functions of these two regional ponds.
Recommendation 8: When Boutwell Road is
reconstructed, the roadway and culverts should be
constructed as described in the analysis below, to prevent
flooding of Boutwell Road.
Stormwater Analvsis
.
The Boutwell South Area includes subdistricts S208, S209,
and S206 of the Stillwater Drainage District, described in the
1997 Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). Figure 5
identified the boundaries of these subdistricts. When the
AUAR analysis was completed, these subdistricts were
proposed to remain in rural residential land uses (1 unit per 2.5
acres) through the year 2015. This plan suggests that portions
of the area be designated for Low Density Single Family uses,
at a density of up to 3 units per acre. The change in proposed
densities requires that the AUAR analysis be reviewed,
potential impacts identified, and recommendations developed
to avoid or mitigate for potential impacts.
The AUAR proposed to avoid impacts of proposed
development in the Stillwater Annexation Area by diverting
storm water away from Brown's Creek, a state-designated
trout stream, to McKusick Lake and a ravine downstream. The
diversion system included in the AUAR Mitigation Plan was
sized to divert 100 percent of the runoff from events up to a 3-
inch, 24-hour event. The recommendati.ons for the Boutwell
South Planning Area include the rate control necessary to
maintain the storm water management goals of the AUAR
Mitigation Plan.
Stormwater Analvsis Assumotions
.
During development of this plan, the drainage system for the
area was reviewed from a regional perspective. In modeling
'the subwatersheds in the Boutwell South Area, two '
assumptions were made:
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
13
.
1.
Development of the Boutwell South area was
assumed to occur at the maximum proposed
densities.
The contributions of local water quality/quantity
ponds or infiltration approaches within local
development sites were not included. Only the
completed retention ponds in the Public Works
Facility have been modeled. Therefore, the
results are conservative.
2.
Subdistrict S208 Recommendations
There are two landlocked depressions within S208. The
Tables and accompanying text below summarize the analysis
completed to identify impacts to these ponds from the
development proposed in the Boutwell South Area. To provide
flood control for the surrounding development and moderate
water level fluctuation, outlets are recommended for both
depressions.
.
The change in proposed land uses (represented by the curve
number on the tables) is associated with only a minor change
in High Water Level from the existing conditions forthe two
depressions. This is due to the addition of the outlets, Table
3 provides the summary of the proposed pond
characteristics,
Regional Pond S-P208,1: The farthest upstream depression,
designated S-P208.1, has the following characteristics,
. Drainage area = 24.75 acres
. Surface area at NWL (903.2' based on 1996 aerial
topography) = 0.72 acres.
. Estimated existing watershed curve number = 65
. Proposed watershed curve number = 75
. Proposed outlet to be restricted by a 6-inch orifice.
. Table 1 provides HWL comparisons between
existing and proposed conditions (assuming a
starting water surface elevation of 903.2').
Table 1 - Regional Pond S-P208.1
Storm Event Existing
(24-hour) HWL
1-year 903.9
2-year 904.3
100-year 907. 1
Proposed
HWL
904.0
904.3
907.2
.
Regional Pond S-P208.2: The outlet from regional
pond S-P208.1 was routed downstream to depression
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
14
.
.
Pond
S-P208. 1
S-P208.2
.
S-P208.2. The drainage characteristics of S-P208.2
are as follows.
. Drainage area = 19.66 acres
. Surface area at NWL (896.0' based on 1996
aerial topography) = 0.41 acres
. Existing watershed curve number = 65
. . Proposed watershed curve number::: 75
., Proposed outlet to restricted by an 8-inch orifice
. Table 2 provides HWL comparisons between
existing and proposed conditions (assuming a
starting water surface elevation of 896').
Table 2 - Regional Pond S-P20B.2
Storm Event Existing
(24-hour) HWL
1-year 896.8
2-year 897.1
100-year 900.3
Proposed
HWL
897.3
897.8
901.1
Table 3 - Pond S-P20B.1 & S-P20B.2 Summar,'
NWL 100-Year HWL Peak
Discharge
(cfs)
1.8
2.1
Storage
Volume (acre-
feet)
4.9
5.0
903.2
896.0
907.2
901. 1
Boutwell Road Recommendations
Boutwell Road frequently floods where the road
crosses two channels. The road is expected to be
rebuilt in the near future due to its age and condition.
There are two primary culvert crossings along Boutwell
that were evaluated in this study. The west crossing
occurs in subdistrict 8206, the east crossing in
subdistrict S209.
The 1997 AUAR Feasibility Study recommended
improvements for flood protection at these culvert
crossings, These recommendations were re-evaluated
and have been revised as discussed below. The
revised recommendations were developed to restrict
flow rates under Boutwell Road, to provide a system
that meets the AUAR mitigation strategy. The Boutwell
Road improvements are needed regardless of the
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
15
.
potential for redevelopment upstream of Boutwell
Road.
Boutwell Road East: Boutwell Road east
crossing receives flows from its direct drainage
area (subdistrict S209), Long Lake channel,
and subdistrict S208. The proposed culvert is a
36-inch pipe (estimated upstream invert 879.0).
The modeled 1 OO-year storm HWL along the
road is 883.0', with a peak flow of 53 cfs. The
existing road elevation of 885.6' provides
sufficient freeboard.
Boutwell Road West: Boutwell Road west
crossing receives flow from subdistrict S206
and areas in Stillwater south of CSAH 12 and
from the City of Grant (west of Manning Ave,).
This road crossing is the most susceptible to
flooding due to its low profile at the crossing
and insufficient culvert capacity, One 36-inch
and two 24-inch culverts at staggered
elevations are recommended.
.
The 36-inch outlet is proposed to convey
channel flow (estimated upstream invert
elevation = 878.5'). The 36-inch culvert will
provide rate control for the 3-year and smaller
storm events. The two 24-inch outlets with
upstream invert elevation of 881.0' will be used
only during high flow events. The modeled
1 OO-year storm HWL along the road is 885.6',
with a peak flow of 126 cfs. The HWL and peak
discharge assumes ponding in Grant as
proposed in the AUAR. Without ponding in
Grant the HWL will rise to 888.9 feet (unless the
road is allowed to flood periodically, though at a
lower frequency, or additional culverts are
added),
The existing road has a low point elevation of
882.9 feet. The road profile will need to be
raised to provide flood storage volume
upstream of the road, cover over the proposed
culverts and freeboard protection for the road.
.
The recommendations for Boutwell Road may
be modified when Boutwell Road is
reconstructed. As stated previously the
recommendations assume a conservative
scenario were future local water quantity and
quality ponds within the redevelopment areas
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
16
.
directly draining to the road crossings were not
taken into account.
Intearation of Storm Water and Circulation Svstems
The location and design of infrastructure systems in the
Boutwell South area provides opportunities to create
connections and amenities that will add value to the area.
Figure 6 suggests a conceptual design for the Neal Avenue
extension and adjacent storm water facilities as a "prairie
parkway" that showcases the character of the local landscape,
connects wetland and upland habitat patches, and provides
areas for storm water management and recreation.
.
The concept design includes the following:
. A curved parkway that emphasizes the rolling
nature of the landscape, and provides views of the
ponds, and upland open space areas, The curves
and plantings could be designed to reduce speeds
on the parkway.
. A wide boulevard along the parkway with groups of
trees and wide swales planted with native grasses
and wildflowers. The swales may be used to
infiltrate storm water runoff from the roadway and
adjacent areas.
. Ponds planted with native wetland and meadow
plants, and preservation of existing wooded areas
that serve storm water management and habitat
functions.
. Open space areas that provide opportunities for
passive recreation and casual play.
. A recreational trail that connects the proposed trail
on Boutwell Road with the existing trail on County
Road 12. The proposed underpass for trail
connections under County 12 is just west of the
proposed parkway.
Design elements of the parkway, such as curves and
plantings, could be continued. along new residential streets in
the Boutwell South area, to emphasize the character of the
local landscape and give the area a unique signature among
Stillwater neighborhoods.
D. Sewer and Water Services
.
Recommendation 9: City sewer and water services should
be provided to the areas proposed for Single Family land
uses in this plan. The areas in the eastern half of the
Boutwell South area can be served from existing City services
at the current Neal-Boutwell Avenue intersection.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
17
.
'-- ;-:- 0 OJ
c./' =-~ 0
z U1
r'l ~ C
0
./' ~
N U1 0
o ~ -'I
o 0
i'J 0 m
~ UJ r
0 -i r
LO -
./' ,-- CJ)
n r-
E; ::: 0
./' )> C
0 --i -1
~ fTl
C) :r
./' ;U
U1 '1J
-,
0 r
0 ~
~ I
~ z
0
1O Z j
C) -
Vi Z I
N \
0 C)
<:
-- !
C) }>
:xl
m
}>
CJ)
C
:xl
"TI
~
()
m
~
~
-1
m
:xl
m
r
m
~
m
z
-1
CJ)
..~.~
...... . ......
t. r. IJ UJ
'...1 J \_J \ J
\, V. l
\J q, \l. \L
~ j J l.." j
....I . \ll
'l,
~, "^'
.
.
'1\ 11[1
'4Y
. /' ,-~--=,"":~(~'
__ ( _ I I-.ir'-"~"'-i:
, . zS: ; . ---
~ 1:.IIIJ~J.rl" '.
fl
,,___ -i
.__:i,-_ (-.\ '
___~_\.\ t~---(jb
'.., ' ('..:)
\'-
-)''c-, /' "
'7~"..
"l ""
c?\\ /~~.
/I~
lJ~'!-\
,\.\~,
1\. '.
,
':J_rl
l,.~
J~~J
{l...
I....!.--:-. '"
\J\\JJ
t,: I
r \
.. \\
In'.' "
.j "'-- /. .' - II.'
". .. I'. 1\
/. ,.' I.. 'J ..'J
,l"J ( .;C
''0~~
" "1. ~
,,', I
If" .... /1
\-,,' ...............,/
...-;;;;
rtr~
ED
W
A'>
. 1._____ ,",
,:~.:.\. \
I ( .i~)
, /
\. \~I / ~;i
J ...~~./:J,I
~ ih'1r\l
~
~
~~ ,
F
000
~.'
1l,J ,V
m
~
g
;0 -n <'.: ;0
C1J iJ' 0 C1J
~ C1J o' CL
o. C1J
.., <
::J ~
Q. ::E 0
0 -0
-n ~- 3
0
::J Ul '"
n. :T ::l
'"
D- o
OJ ()
0 0
c ~
::J :=:
D- 'S
~ Ul
'<
,\\
\:~ )).
.\ /
wi) >__~.
L..
------ -.,---....
''\,.,
'\
'\\
f\
(~
"'u'
v
\~
e's
J po ,
I ..'
,( ',:?,"
\:.~
'Y
~-' - LI
u
1:1 ~
(I u
)11;\ m
~ \.J nJi
I \\ Cf)i
c=i~
."
-
C>
c
;0
m
U1
1\
'" 0 \.1
\ -\~ l'll ,,"it
\ ~. ,l, " I'
\. ~ I . ,
\\,\ _'\_ I
(' . )
j J, "'
;o\.~~; '(fJ
',~..t~ (:) N
~::~- ,\'il ~ -
~. >/ . v L:J / - -.- ,-"",~J
(, \.-.'0\ - l ,\ .I~\
\ \) , '1 j.J ' , .- - -' .. /
II .,..,. ~ ~ \.. ""x/\.\ '
4("'-':/--'00"--'1 ...... ~I ~ .s \;/ 'okl" .
'~i/ J 1\\ . \(, c \'. /=!:'J-J
i .;~ ~\\I ,J '" . Y~\iJ
__._~... I___.._.._._,..\..._.'.-'-...-/:./~ " l_
.----.; \. 1/1 ~
~_? ''(j) \\_~~:)/'-.~--.<~
~ J'~"---=.:. :-i'"
I ~ f! ..1
.__. (rill ~ l! . ,II:':? .
'" .._.,_ ),' ) ..... I ,,-...' l'
," ~~-' '
'. <..,<;:, . /' ,;. ,
..tJ/-'--~ . J' L ~-_.' ~ j
'.. -..... . i '
)'. ~/. _~_'." ___. ., >~_' ~ . __ _1 J'" (. /
\ 'Jj, _~'... 'J - - - 0~?\\ " l t . ,_ _'
U'll I 1;j J, / ~., LiJ, ,\",-.' ,I IrJ
~N :-t;r ~ ~ ~ ';~. '_:'-1--=-;~~." \~' ~
/ /~ [I' I - I ~ 1J~1. ,,~)l -/ I J" -1
",XS,') i ,-), ~~~ J ~~ "I ~ l. ,:.~.
/' /'>, "- I , ' ~1
, '.) IL n X
b C.,"""'" ~ '(\J
\ \. I oo.".~ .~. ~---G:J..-....._...--...------ t I
\' I \f<,J I I . .11 ,.'J
= ~'O '1',1 ~ L,'i'.J
-0 ~ Ii1W \";r~, '-;E!!V
~~________i!< LI<..) 00 @. "l'-l~!J ,6 (. .....
__, :~___.1\-.\\ \ . ~13'~ ~ . .>'
~ ---1~15J}'~V I /(--1 ~', ~__-/;~J \)~~\, IC'. ~~.l
_ Sl\~riJ I~ .'_ , j' \~.) / \,1 { _q ..;-' '/-01'" '--l-:- ..);... ;:-~~'l)
-- :J] n._-.lL:-! i_ .~., /"1'/ .'11 OLP D ;;. ~ ,j it \:i Q , ';1
L_ [")c..J 7"1' .......----")u f'" L'I ,(
_ __ 0 , . L; ~ ..1,.,'" -.J 'c...
, ' n J fe] 11'i --- ' I V... . /. 'IF:' .J'l.:
, \, '.' ._ __ ' '. ,._ I', ,1
: \)~I\- \~; 1"...__._.-.. .i,.- . / ''-.\~,lj..I.LI!/t:)'('
/..,/\. -l['. ~., --. ._.~I , ( .. ."."
(/ >~..J ~i..)'1.~; / ). \ l " /~ ('-,' _ ~ r:;) ('i".1 lr( '. 'fic' J' ,~/>-.
'- j . ' ,j c::::. / V~ ., I~ I I \ \. ;," )
. . .....__~/ ,; ,'. (I '. ..J. " ,>....)
1:11 /:1 ' ..-..--,-.-".....1.-- ;\',(,., '_. -.-~~~..--\/I I!
o ! .I') ,.. ,'/"., .('j';;::I~J 'L ,;.I~-+ Ii.' ~/ __,0, ....S; ..,','.
, , 'y' ". l'. .' . ,=="" ~".' '.. . 1 ",. ~ . " ,
I___(~']' 'fI) f.' .,lyJ,>-, .\ij\"'<r;-.cJ.. . . _.11:LG,:...-J\_.,r~.,) '!I.\.,\....SJ()
I - 'v/'.; -....) ; ( "'\\ . /., '0-' .' .> ""1"4" .t,<:-~\f/. l..1 1'9 i.. ".- n \ ."~3 \ '
. '-0 -- <~() ;./ .,.../-).. ,.',:'> o-fJ' 0.. ,.' .,~,:'.., ~5'. /,0.\7, I~" ('\\'. vC/
(j) : \ ..) ./. _ -'~.;'- 0 ~._. .,' ,~;..,i'/ '-: F'L "1.,: \l .. '
() . '.', I " .-/ ..'.' ",'1 ""'J I l,.. . hc' \ \.
e. _. . \,:SS', ~<:;:;-;,sf...' '.''v - .", C;{l\\~I/.,.i~((). 'C/ n,.\(~ U-J,,'.\J ~~.S\..I'':'':"
(j) . i';',./' ) ,.' i, '.~ u/' ,,,./,'!- 11.1 rediD ~h "'J I\(Z>
(j)" I i,,-------J 7 . f, ....i'~ @J c~, \( t.,I\ I J~ (! -', ... "''' lq Y.n-~' "-"\. }41
(j)! m J, / . ----_,I" i' \11'.lll.JC/LJ\-J~ ,.'. \..../............. ,.,.' --"'1
"-"c. 0 ( J ,I . I.... "-..) , .' .'
10 ~\ I ' , \'
!t
~-"
c-~
.j~-,,_I.....
!
\,
'kl'
~'\
L_ J
U
=;]
I1j
~fI<
m
::21
eQ
'{\
i
I
! ~~_ C--..........
I -------... - .-
N
~.o
o
z. '---
/
._LoU
... J
(J
"
~. \.
I ~- -
-- .-.. I. -'-- . .~ ~ \,,\ _ .
- - ..,.. r --- .......-. - . .'
-' ~ --"'"" ...,-r . '""-. -................
u - --.. -......-. -
. I . - ---
.. yp.or~ -(PAl\- \JN~~,q~~
-~~
. .-1i~~ A~,.
· .. 3ol'1'~t:.>u.. ~t) \:1Ttt 17L..AHN Iii q ~ - NeAt-. -:::r~\I'lA) cDli~ ~~lqN
.-
----
. -......
\
\
,
I
,
.
h1 \1M- (p
.
('
'. ,l'Iu.\..Pt\F~'(
~fA\fttE: ~~ ~p "Pl7~\~. .Ppe.1'1 6f'~
....
.
. -
_....... ..-"-- ~
~
~ --
.
Areas in the western half of the Boutwell South area that are
proposed for Single Family land uses can be served from
existing service lines to the north or south.
City service capacity is available to meet demands estimated
for the proposed land uses in this area.
.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
18
.
IV. Implementation
This plan will be implemented over time. Timing will be based
on landowner interest, availability of services and publiG
improvements, mark.et demand for development and City
ability to accommodate development. Steps needed to
implement the plan include the following:
.
Land Use
. Apply for annexation to the City. Annexation requests
should be accompanied by Planned Unit Development
concept.
. If annexation is approved, the property is annexed with
Agricultural Preserve zoning designation.
. Make application to re-zone the property. Re-zoning
must be approved by the Planning Commission, Joint
Board, and City Council consistent with area plan land
use and PUD.
. Phase III expansion area development should direct
access and traffic, to the maximum extent, through
road design and location to TH 96 and CR 15.
Roadwav. Utilitv and Stormwater Imorovements
. Neal Parkway between Boutwell Road and CR 12 may
be developed in phases, based on the timing of
development on various parcels in the Boutwell South
Area.
. City presents proposed Neal Parkway design, including
connections to CSAH 12, to the County. The City
coordinates with the County to complete final designs.
. Public hearing scheduled with area residents to
discuss proposed changes to CSAH 12, including
access changes at Northland Avenue.
. County Board must approve connection to CSAH 12.
. Boutwell Road and related trail and stormwater
improvements completed by the City in 2005-2006.
This may include reconfiguration of Boutwell/County 12
intersection.
. Regional ponds and local storm water management
strategies are designed as part of the PUD process,
and implemented as development occurs.
. County completes improvements to County Road 15
from TH 36 to CR 12 (2007).
.
Trails
. Trails are completed as development occurs. The
City and County may participate in development of
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
19
.
some trails and in completion of the underpass at
County Road 12.
.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
20
.
A I I ACHMENTS
Attachment A: Approved Expansion Area Study
Recommendation City Council, April 20, 20~4.
Attachment B: Washington County Public Works
Letters regarding CR 12 and Boutwell South Area
Plan (July 29, 2002 and August 23, 2002).
Attachment C: North 62nd Planning Area Concept
Plan (Curve Crest Extension to CR 15),
Attachment D: Boutwell Area Transportation Study,
November 12, 2003.
.
.
City of Stillwater-Boutwell South Area Plan
21
.
Attachment A
City of Stillwater City Council Minutes
April 20, 2004
Motionby Councilmember Kriesel, seconded by CouncilmemberRheinberger to
make Deerpath right out only onto Olive Street, make Brick Streetthe collector
street and upgraded, and have further study done on the intersection of Neal
Avenue at County Road 12, along with other intersections along County Road
12.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Mayor Kimble
Nays: Councilmember Junker
.
Motion by Councilmember Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Kriesel
directing staff to implement the SRF Consulting Short Range Recommendations
1) Encourage the development teams to orient planned streets and access points
to encourage new development generated traffic to use Manning Avenue. 3) The
agencies should work together to manage access to Manning Avenue between
Highway 36 and Highway 96 and actively support improvements that provide a
high level of mobility on this important arterial facility. 4) The City should actively
work with Stillwater Township to plan for and implement a north frontage road
connection along Highway 36 between Manning Avenue and Stillwater
Boulevard. The frontage road should be implemented as soon as possible and
be designed to a minimum of 35 MPH. All in favor.
.
.
Donald J, Theisen, P.E.
Deputy OireclatlCounty EnO .
James D.luoer. RlA
Parlcs Diredat
July 29, ~002 ..
WASHINGTON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
& PHYSICAL DEVELOP.MENT
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH . SJIL~~n:R;MiNNES9TA '.55082-9573
651-430-4300 acsirnJ.. '!lle.Machinali51-430-4350 :,
i""l i...'.....
C) 1 2002 \
J\ll " . \
n,n~~f;~rr.""", I
"'''00. .. ....
. . .. BCt1i:.S,~' riiJt',p.~.....;oo .
. .'i' \~ & t.l5.;__..,.. .
. ".'t:E',',. -~ -
.~.,..;....- .......
OonaldC.Wis Attachmen1
Direclat
\/lrolnla S. Chace
AdtrinlsltaUve SenIlccs Dilllslon Mana.
Larry S. Nybeck, P~ty Surveycr
Deputy Direclct. SUtVeyand Land
Manaoement Division
MarVin Erickson . ; .
. 'FaclJjUes Manager :
Steve Russeir .
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
. th
216 N. 4 S1.
Stillwater, MN 55082
BOUTWELL SOUTH AREA PLAN
Dear Steve:
.
We appreciate your, Klayton's, an'd the City's consultants' time in meeting with us on July 23rd to
discuss the Draft Boutwell South Area Plan Draft Report. With the Stillwater City and Township Joint
Board's approval of the Draft Report on July 24th, we want to provide you with our comments on this
report and the recommended Neal Avenue alignment as the City Council considers final ~pproval.
This area has several challenges for providing a local road system that works with our County
highway system. These include vertical grades, current City street spacing, current traffic pattems
and their affect on neighborhoods, al)d adjacent properties that will develop in different timeframes. .
We all knoWlhat traffic on City streets and along County State Aid Highway 12 (CSAH 12) will oilly
increase with time. While n~ither the amount nor the pace of this increase is exactly known,
planning for this increase in this difficult area is needed. .
The County's investment in access control when CSAH 12 was constructed in'the mid-seventies
was a step to assist in the future planning of developments. The existing access openings on the
north side of CSAH 12 are generally 30 feet wide and, therefore, do not accommodate a City street.
There is no access opening that aligns with the proposed Neal Avenue connection. Any changes to
this access control will require County Board approval.
We appreciate that the proposed alignment of Neal Avenue addresses some local con~ms.
However, transferring or creating problems on the regional highway system to address local
concems is not reasonable. We know from our experience in operating our highway system that the
proposed location for connecting NealAvenue to CSAH12 will ~reate operational p'roblem~. on the.
. County highway. . There simply is 'riot e'nough length between the adjacent intersections (Northland
Avenue and Maryknoll Drive) to develop appropriate left turn lanes. It would be irresponsible for us
to allow construction of an intersection that will create a situation that affects the safety of qurrent
~nd future highway users.
While further analysis is needed, the proposed Neal Avenue connection location may be acceptable
if Northland Avenue and possibly Maryknoll Drive are restricted to right-in/right-out movement only.
This would require a raised median on CSAH 12. The County does not have any project .
programmed or funds available in the current Capital Improvement Program for this work. We
would expect that the development creating the need for this improvement would qear the cost of
. the needed work.
.
.
WASHINGTON COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
& PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH, STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
651-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 651-430-4350
Conald C. Wisniewsld, p.e.
Director
Donald J, Theisen. P.e.
Deputy DirectorlCounly Er.~ineer
James D.luger. R1.A
Parl<s DIrector
Virginia S, Chace
AdninislraUve SeMces DI.,;sion ~t
lany S. Nybeck. PlS-CCX:nty Survey
Deputy Director, Survey and Land
Manage~nt Di'J!sion
August23,2002
. .
. Marvin ErIckson ;.
. FaClllties ~\anager .
Sherri Buss
BRAA, Inc.
2335 W. Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
BOUTWELL SOUTH AREA PLAN: DRAFT REPORT-AUGUST 2002
Dear Sherri:
, ,
.
We have reviewed the latest draft of the Boutwell South area Plan and generally feel that it fairly
represents the County's positions. We do have several comments:
· Section II. Existing Conditions and Issues, Roadways~ Streets, and Trails- Manning
Avenue'; We suggest changing the term "stopUght" to "traffic signal". Thereferemce to.a .
tempor.ary traffic signal at the BoutwelVMannhlg intersection could be misconstrued- it is too
I~te to add that to the tum lane project, but one could be considered at that intersection if .
signal warrants are met. We plan to add that intersection to our Traffic Signal Ranking
System. but would not ordinarily install a signal until the conditions at the intersection place it
in a position in the rankings to get funding. At that time a signal would be installed in
accordance with our cost participation policies. Realistically, it could. be many years before
this intersection would rise high enough in the rankings to be funded. Also, the last
sentence in the Manning Avenue section contains a typo and it could be c1earer- the earliest.
that we could get federal funding for an upgrade of Manning Avenue north of CSAH 12 is
2008. . .
.
· Section II. Existing Conditions and Issu~s, Existing Traffic- The frustration expressed by
. Iqcal residents ;:1bout poor circulation and about increased traffic on Nprthland and Maryknoll
.iIIustrate~a classic ~ense 9f frustr~tionof residents in grow!ngarea~~ they can't have it both
ways. Good circulation will, in most"cases, increase traffic. Nevertheless; we do not feel
that a~igning a Neal Avenue connection to CSAH 12 with either Northland or Maryknoll will
lead to sigDificant cut-through traffic- the routes are simply too circuitous. We feel that it is
. necessary to aUgn Neal Avenue with an existing street to create a safe intersection. Our
collective opinion is that nearly all of the drivers wishing to go to the commercial areas
around County Road 5 and Highway 36 will use Deer Path as a cut-through route as drivers
are doing today. We feel that development of the Boutwell South area will increase traffic on
Deer Path significantly because that is the shortest, most direct route and that drivers will not
choose Maryknoll or Northland because they are longer and less direct.
. .
· Section IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell South Planning Area B. Roadways,
Recommendation 3: Neal Avenue should be extended to County Road 12 midway
between Northland and Maryknoll Avenues.- As we have discussed, since the right of
.
.
.
Page two
Letter to Sherri Buss - Boutwell
August23,2002
way of CSAH 12 includes access contro!", approval of the County ~oard is required for any >
connection to be made in the access controlled portion. Our discussions of median~
. '.centered o.n raised rrleoians creating a physicalb~rrier-to prohibited.tuming movelJ1eritS.and,
therefore, beirig 'the onlyway"to enforce'rigl1t-ihlrighf-Ol,lt" restrictions: Itw6Lild pe. difficult
and very expensive to design medians that effectively limit'movements and allow a safe
location for the inevitable U-tums that will occur. Moreover, the restriction of Northland,
Maryknoll, or both to right-in/right-out movements would likely be very unpopular with the
residents of those streets. Under some conditions, we might be able to recommend a plan.
such as this to the Board, but we feel that lining the Neal Avenue connection up with either
Northland or Maryknoll is very important. Under any circumstance, we could not allow .
restriction of the streets to the south without a public hearing.
e.. SeC?tion IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell South Planning Area B. Roadways,
Recommendation 3: Neal Avenue should be extended to County'Road 12 midway
between Northland and Maryknoll Avenues.- The comments on lowered speed limits in
this section are speculative and may give residents who view speeds as too high a false
sense that development along CSAH 12 will lower the speed limit when that is rarely the
case. In any event, lowered speed limits do not correlate to increased access.
Section IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell South Planning Area B. Roadways,
R~commendation 3: Neal Avenue.should be extended to County Road 12 midway
between Northland and Maryknoll Avenues.- The City's 'recOmmendations for the . . .
recommended Neal Avenue alignment are illogical: Access to collector roads would be
better if intersections with the arterial road (CSAH 12) were consolidated at fewer
intersections. This plan does not consolidate access; it spreads it out to more locations than
necessary and more than can safely be accommodated. Fewer intersections along the
arterial would reduce the number of turning movements necessary to get on and off of the
arterial and the intersections could be controlled with traffic signals or all-way stop signs, if
necessary. The recommended alignment will result in more intersections, none of them
easily controlled. The mid-point location of Neal Avenue would not necessarily spread
traffic among the residential streets to the south since few of them offer a direct route
anywhere- it would likely perpetuate the already contentious cut-through traffic on Deer Path.
e
.
Section IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell South Planning Area B. Roadways, .
. Recommendation 4: The Boutwell-County Road 1~ intersectio~ should be modified to
improve f)afety. rraffic Analysis;' The comments ~>n traffic signals at the CSAH_ 12/15 .
intersection and at the CSAH 15/BoutWell intersection should be clarified: . It is highly likely
that the reconstruction plans for CSAH 15 will include a traffic signal at CSAH. 12, but
nothing specific has yet been proposed. It is certainly an option and very likely, but at this
time, there are no plans. A signal at CSAH 15/Boutwell intersection is a possibility, but it
would be treated as all other County road intersections are- it would be subject to the
standards of the County's Traffic Signal Ranking System and our cost participation policies.
Section IV. Recommendations'forthe Boutwell South Planning Area B. Road~aysJ
. Recommendation 4: The Boutwell-County Road 12 intersection should be modified to
improve safety. Traffic Analysis- We disagree somewhat with the wording of the section
that states that, 'The proposed alignment fOf the Neal Avenue connection to County 12 at a
point midway between residential streets to the south, to encourage the use of County 15
and disperse traffic among other streets, father than creating a direct connection and higher
.
.
Page three
Letter to Sherri Buss - Boutwell
August23,2002
traffic volumes on residential streets to the south." This sentence is grammatically unclear
and suggests that drivers will continue south through any str~et that lines up with Neal
Avenue, whether it is a direct route to any destination or not. Very few drivers will cut .
through residential areas.uniess.they find that iUs. a quicker route to'.theirdestination,'. ..
. :Neither NOrthland nor Maryknollis "an efficienf route to anyWhere but the residential areas:
. that surround them. .
· Section IV. Recommendations for the Boutwell South Planning Area B. Roadways,
Recommendation 4: The Boutwell-County Road 12 intersection should be modified to
improve safety. Traffic Analysis- The final bullet in this section contains a typo and we
al.so disagree with its content. We feel that development of the Boutwell South area will
have minimal traffic impact on Maryknoll Avenue and Northland Avenue, but will perpetuate
the pattem of.drivers using Deer Path as a cut-through route. . .
We appreciate your efforts to include our comments in the report. I hope that these comments
clarify the County's positions. Please call me at 651-430-4312 if you have any questions or
comments.
.
Sincerely,
Cl~ %'/<
\.Jefseph Lux
. Senior Transportation Planner
c: Steve Russell, Stillwater Community Development Director
Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer
Don Theisen, County EngineerlTransportation Division Director
Wally Abrahamson Washington County Commissioner, District 3
Jim Schug, Washington County Administrator
M\USERS'PW\.JFLUX\WORDIP/at Review. StillwatenBoutweU South August 2002 Dralldoc
.1
. .
..
Attachment C
.
...
-1 ,~~~ .
r~~:'~;::;;:'};~"1]:!""';""i:i).o."7;;, .". "..~. ..
th
~:
100 YR. STORM
SEWER PIPE
AND OVERFLOW
CHANNEL
,1
z"
:J
o
U
,,"!.
.
w
~
CJ
Z .:
z:
Z~
<('!<
L ".
~
~
CAMPUS RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
_ _0:":'..."..,..;--:...-.......-.':':........4... ....
~....~
... _. ..... -....- ,......---.-.......--:;."";.:;.... -...... --...... _.~.... ",'-
HIGHWAY 36
.
STillWATER, MN
NORTH 62ND PLANNING AREA CONCEPT PLANS
; r ~ Bonestroo
LJ Rosene
8 Anderlik &
. \J ~ Associates
Engineers & Architects
I
}
"
..
.j
J
1 ~
,''I, ~ 0
'T . ~ ~
Il>, <Ifl' if
f~"" ...
'"ri.~
\
,.
· "
{'. ,,'
~ ==
l
I ~
"'
I ~
:::
:;: ,~
:',\
~,
~
.
~
Lv ~o
, /.
1....tt > .
~ -.;- ---
~h
~~
~.. .: '"
"\\ .li't
\~
-~------
~
~
mCONSULTING
~
.-
- - - -- - -~ - -----
.
Table of Contents
-
.
-
---
_ ~ iiiiiiI
iiii
-~
iiiiiI
-
o
ooooaCOOOCOOQOOCOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO~
o
o ob 0 ~fiJ'*~*
III
III
o
COOQCOO[)ORO~}3
oo~oooooooooooooonD
o
.~ ilti'\
"QO~O 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 .l.I!Y"
pho 0 0,0 0 0 ~ III III
""
= II == iili;;!l If == ;;
o
o
OOOOOQCOoaacoooooooooom
o~
~ ~COOOQ[]OOOCOOOOO'pOOOO~
2
_ -.. - .. iiiii iiiii _- -iiiii . iiiii iiiii __ iiiil iiiil iiiil iiiil ~ IiiiiiIiI
Introduction
,. MI
(J Jl1tlOlml~ &~~lncl~l ~~L~
o . I~&~~~ll
+',.~~~""
J:i
.(Immnm CfID
..
"'" '" ....
I
o
Ifllrnliml x"~;\;'.: "'
o .. ' ,'. .' '. ~.. ' .
. .
a ~~~.....:." A....
;JlOO tt> n~ ~
:C~..""....'''.'
:~
trf)b~~~
=
3
-
-.
-
- - __ __ __ ,. IIiii Iiii iIIiiI _
Study Area Location Map
iiiiiI
'~ \"'<~\ @m r- --~ ,../~:;rc4~(Y
.......~.........). .~...<:~'~RJN"......s.. / .",,,,,, d -r V;t
,~) T~n Lak~S ~I ' '.. _ __ '. /~V C'i,,-.----j;l
"'S.-"'-"'~/ \ 'J . .. +c V:1
J-.. \ 1 - ..,' v .~" \:'~.."..- .,,,- <..,.,,~ ~ ?" '. /
- ~ '- /, :~:'<r" "'1, \::.(:!.;..~~.;~:::~:.:t'-. ~ t, .. I
'<~.""~ ~".1~,~":<::-{<;- ( - ~ ~ r 51. CroIx River /
'1---~~i~~i~~-t0((l~~~j~ - ~\ i /
, I ;{ ^--- ~$,~~fg~; - - "'~T n = ~ I {
Trs 80h8<N ~.- .~: \f:\S:~~"\ ~L- ''''''1==1 f' { .,,~.
I \ -......... "',* ''''''. . .... I 1
~---_. V"- J~;~r~,/~-;I ::, ~
umm??t~~ - r ~ 6' '-'I'~"'- \ \
. r--'>' - Z - _, \ \
'14., --j I \ \.
. ~ {-4-~'~t:-[:. J rT1 ' \,
. I . rc- - \:\
'"51'" r~. Ih '\
.;;J ..,-.. ( . ( ~ '\
. ~\ ~\ 1~-r----- -- \,,'.).
......rN'~,~il.'. ~l_~~ ~ ._. - - - - t - _\ \~ '\\...
-,. LakaLWv<:" " '\
C' . P~uk t,....). ----
~. '" / IT ..-..-... - - 'I.
~...,c.;; .;ii: ~ ... ~ 'J .......... * _L - I 'I
~~r~t~,
~~;: ..... I. -. .....r- *" - L ....,~ h
""-"I . } e\ ( , I , - l' " ~
')~ /~ . . I ~- , : -
t:;;-;; 60th 5t N ~'... _ _ C~ i . \ \
:;il=--1-r _-:;;&.. rl-"1/:' ~. .... '\.:. ::-~r71 - ~T--[ -.j t---rt - - ?J1-1--
N :.~ ............... ..; . I L-t- ~-\
-~ : {, .': :...:.. ..... -\
r-- '0'1 1/(' ..... / J . \ \:\ r I ""'\ ;....: .' I ......... ...... -< J..,--y....... _ -.J \
:z:
:~j
.oi
. c:
."c:
. C.
.ro
.::;:.
.......
! ~
-.
-
-~
==
=
4
- -.. - - - - _ _ -.'_ IiiiI Iiii .. iiiiI IIiiiI _,. ==
Study Purpose
}
= =
~C.....i...".'
......i.~... .. ,: ...- _.._i-;'~-_ .. .. -:
,', ...'.,.. ..,.....,...., " '<'.
;,. .- ,'" "
. . 'I
-0
=
~
5
I
- .1
.- -.. - - iiiii Iiii.. IiiiiIiiI _ _ ~ .. -iiiii.. __ iiii iiiiiiii iiiii iiiiiI" _
Boutwell Area Transportation Study Schedule
~
=
6
---
_ _.. _ _ _ - IiIii _- -_ - . iiiii __ iiiiii iiiiiI Iiiii iiiiii iiiiii ,. liliiii
Boutwell Study Area Issues
a llnurrrnrah.~~ \rrdl1nm
==== ==:
II
o
o
~:Fm: 'If\. . M ~.
-~
o
fJBmnbm".5 ':
........"......'>;+'F..'''''*'%~*"''.''''.',~'13I'J>.,.m ",,\"tY-"': ..' ".
; ':,{?1?Y'h:<~>,,':'V:'f-<>":: . "",...
4 .. ..... I 4 I
.iii/4ft"..< ... .. ... .
o ~~traITfv
'"
7
_ _.. _ _ _ Iiiiiii _ ____ ... _ _ _ .. Iiiiiii .. .. . ..
"Through" Traffic Opinion Survey Responses
"""""'Ii'
1M *' i;,j~- ~~"tiW..f""'~-'~"....il,;,";.... .........-...." ,......~~ ..... ~~ .....~. ~...... ~~ ~~,...IMIfii-.'
,
ll\
I
I f
=:r.i =:
= =
8
I
_ _. IiiIIiii Iiiiiii iiiii .iiiii Iiiii .iiiii _.. .iiiii. IiiiiiiL iiiii - - - - . -
"Through" Traffic Survey Comments Received
i'-II>>'."W"."'""~. ...J~"llI!_"'~"'~'k'1l.JJ..'~'" ," ,iiil .... - . " ~ aJlil-'
. Ii!!! ", U III ~ =
~ ll!
. ' . ..w li!l\l . ^ ^ .. ' .. n.. .', .
-~~ '~; -_~: ,: w ~ 1
~ I
"" 'ill'
9
_ ________ _J
_-_-,. _ .. .. _iIiiiii _--_ .,._ _ _ _ _ _ _ , -
Existing Conditions
III II ~
;IIll III
,...~~
~ lf~
~
o
~
':;
:'iJ= = ==
J
10
_ _.. .. iIiii iiiiii iiii -_--_ .,. _ _ - - _ - - .. -
Existing Systems Analysis
=
a
11
-
-----,-----
Functional Classification
-r
-
'-
75th 5t N
, _J
N
+
". f
II
\
~ r/
~ /
z
Q)
>
<(
c:
c:
'c
c:
'"
:::;;
Twin Lake
~
McKusick Rd N
--
-)
ROth 5t N
[!JJ
~
..........
60th 51 N
)
)
/.),\ ,I \.
/
;~
-
-,
-
Legend
Stillwater Comprehensive Plan
Principal Arterial
A Minor Arterial Connector
- - A Minor Arterial Expander
Metropolitan Council
A Minor Arterial Expander
B Minor Arterial or Collector
12
-r------,-------,-
Existing Daily Traffic Volumes
-
\
IN 5,1l~
f'
~
ill
N
_\
,-
J
T
I'
0- ~ J
\ 6~()O
6~ROO ~
~ ~
'q -
~<>,f-" I
\. I
2.t
rl ~ iii
~I
~( I~ I
~-
\.__~.JlU -
-
I 1-=1--
711111
w live 51 ,~ ~
I I I ''1
:'1,300 . ~ ,:
r.. ( I
Uly lake ... --1>.
(fJ
>
Ql
{. -,.
0/ )~',
~( ~,~~
,_ ~o
71
a
~
~
13
c
c
Ir:
c
)
~
~
""g~
<>,f-"
/'
Z
Ql
>
<J:
o
c
.c
~
./
;.1
~30,SOO
~~
--r------~-------.-
Sight Distance Studies
Looking East
Looking West
~ l-
;
~?
!
=
=
(li). .,. (t\)~e~~Q ~'I1'fl~~~~
.~~~ ~~~" ~ ..... ~~:!il!U~ L;.\lr.I ~"\W~~,,~
14
--,------~------ .-
Sight Distance Studies
Looking East
Looking West
"" ,x. A
-.
,
:l'l
'"
r
l:;.~"
;~
i::I
~
~J).I3_ffmlil@l~ n@~Ciif~~
15
--~------,-------,-
I
I
.
~
Sight Distance Studies
Looking Bast
Looking West
..
~'
i~
",;ii", ". .... ~ ,,':'~
-~
1!
..'u'" J " - _.~~;~}~ .: '^" :.~. _
,)~: > , .. ,- J
... . '\,..
. .
~ ,.
, ~:<
.
~....
;;;:
,
<.
~::-:.;-",:'
..
~
'"
~'11 ~&:3_tfilm18~ ROO ~i~rJif_~
16
--r------~-------.-
Travel Time Study Routes
1
I
,.
~
N \
-L
\
l5lh.StN
=II
cn+h~_A.",
~I
Uf
-~-&'
;....".......
%
~~~ I
1- ~lnlf!rlaCh Dr I
~ \-,-1
)9
z
Q)
>
<(
OJ
c:
.c
c:
'"
::::
!
h
-,
(
, ~(.,
*..
)
\ ~,_ J
'4:-Jr"..
Clfte.fe
"
~
~( jl-
) 'I
F'_~ I _ L
~ W "iv. SI I
~1 I --"
\ r ~C
LlI,l'lO:(>
Ci5
'"
',;; .....'{C
~.{ ,~.
""'i"
17
--r------,-------,-
Travel Time Study Results
Average
Travel
Time
Route
Distance
in Miles
:-"Average:~
, :, Speed - ,
MPH
i
~~~~~
'UIbmlftnll_
r I ('r ,') )~r-' r
I
'--'-'I--'-'-'-I-I-'-I--J
'I I
.I-I~I-I-II-I-I-I.
I-I-II-I-I-~
I
:I~I-I-I-I-I-
'I I
1-'-1-1-1-1-
II.!==I==I_I I::=:!:=I~
~I--I-~Ir----
m ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 rn w m 0 W
~,'<-..,.- ,
Boutwell-Manning
Route
9:23
~, ,~"
4.5
29.2
~ ~~ - ~ .~ "f- . -, ;;/:... ~=--, _ .;:;_"':. :-v:::~ "'7"T"'" :_.~ ~'... :-_
~: {:~AH i2-~anning ~-
J~--"-- "..... " ~
J~o~f~ ,~.,," .,~" :-~'-"~ j'
3.!~", _"~'" 1S.1f.i:fi:k~,' , '~< '._
8:13
Deer Path Route
5:23
"~~:~;:3~;2':
-~ """,- " _. :r~
" '.
Northland Avenue
Route
8:00
24.0
Maryknoll Drive
Route' .
- ,
6:03
=
2.4
26.8
(
18
_ _.. _ _ Iiii Iiiii _ _ __ _. iiiii Iiiii Iiiii Iiiii Iiiii Iiiii .- . .-
) Future Conditions
I
A
==ilI
--0
'Ii
~
1k
-= == ~;r;
19
---
-----------------
. . .
Planned Future Growth - Directional Trip Distribution
-
~,/
~
WISCONSIN
Legend
~\I'lUI""',.oI
Sin9"F""yfl~"""'~1
. Mulll..rami;,.ll,lidenlill
_C<>l~""'rci.1
""'1n.2,sI'iol
_""'~U...s.~9<'t!I>,,,
_""'..~U...,..S...."'.ll......
_k'''IiI,"",''"1
.P.....""dR""'..non
...... Opltll ~p,,,, 1l."rl<t.dU..
V<hiwla,lltgh'-'l.WI\'
_R.,t''''Y(<O<r1<lOf
-~'"'
Ope.W.,.,
I
I
bm
N
\
-r )
l1li
]
;II
.:~~..-.<:",',f:- '..l'
20
____ ___.J
-
\"': ~~i;
_ _ II!!! _ _ == ==__.. liliiii _.. __ iiii iiii.
~tudy Area Averag;-Olrly Traffic Volume Map
..
.I'
J
(3,800)
3,noo
05 0'
In:l(lln
M ,,...
t::. tr, e.
\ ,,- ~ =--rr
(;) ,~~ 0';::'0
~_ 92~ ~ ~ ~
~ (;) ~ ""l ~.
. (6,35l!l. ~.nno ~.oOd Rd N ~\.e. ~ /
[8,3001 ~r I ". 0)
Twin Lake - 0 _ l4~6~5l\
~! t5,850\
~
[5,000] 0- 0'
In C 0
"It C 0
o....! ..t
~QO ..... 0
(1,< ~ ~e
-4fl,fO) (2,350)...: ~:
7t!l~ ~ ~ ~,~_~~o ~ .....1
. ~7j ...... [3,70~Rdl\'
o
0" ~
~g ,.:
rit-: ~
....c
~-
~
'-11
\ ,.,.
('
[,TI
(7,350)
75th 51 N 5.SflO
"" Z
d>
>
<(
c
c
'c
c
co
:2
@~
So 0'
00 In
~o~ N.
....l"'l N
=--=-': ~
N
.~
,:-- l#)
C--
I;j
.. 1'6'
· . IV'a
.. ~
ll).~M' 60th.'
26.5no
'--1
[ I
';~----r
19t
....i
~..)
)
/ J \ \ . \
(~
\
/
111111 = EXIS::: ~:::::T Volume - -1
t
I
[000] = 2015 ADT Forecast Volume r
(includes study area generated traffic on . ';,
the existing roadway system ",f,
m~
.c.,<' )
51. Croix River
(000) = 2015 ADT Background Volume
(Non-Study Area Generated
Background Growth Only)
21
Iiiii
'S;.'-
-
-----------------~
Stu~ Area Focus I Averagloaily Traffic Volume Map
11\(1.
VV(5l,/ o-~
I t:.. 000
(7 .~oo 'fC/ 'r. ~ ~
I. ,800 ,v --:!:.
<. i>... ')
vOl
41c.L-
, I(,IS'
'q
<$,fe
",
C'\ \, (=.. =
~\.0
-
I
\
(
\
....7~
o tnl^- · ~,~
(~~I~ 0 _ '", rJ.... \
\iN .oo!. lrl ~ "$0
I fl ..J:!. 0 C1l /" ·
'- I v ~y. r<'l e '"" t?'>a
. ~ Cfo(). ~
I 0.- rJ..\___
'''. d~ I. ^ ~ Ul- -
,<"", ';::.', 00 00 00
I .., LO LO LO LO LO
oe:.^...... Ol'!.'Ot""LO~O'\LO
o 0 'Ot M ....:.5:2 ~ ...
7 r v ~ 't- r<'l O:I~ 7.fOO
. Wdive S.,
[12 000]
(8.6,JO)
6.ROO
[15 700]
~
\
Lily Lake
o
-0 ~
~Q g
M ...::'~
:!:.~ ~
~)
(
- ---...--
------
e-
o
o
~
,.-
~
2.2 I
.-
(f)
If)
C
Q)
6\
7'
~
.-
(f)
>
Q)
LJ
1'"'""-
Map Legend
,I
000 = Existing 2003 ADT Volume
(000) = 2015 ADT Background
Volume
(Non-Study Area Generated
Background Growth Only)
[000] = 2015 ADT Forecast Volume
(includes study area generated
traffic on the existing roadway
system)
<000> = 2015 ADT Forecast Volume I
(IncludOfl study area generatod
traffic on an alternative roadway
system with a RI\RO at Boutwell
Road and County Road 12 plus Oeor
Path closed at County Road 12. and
traffic calming on Maryknoll Drive)
*000* = 2015 ADT Forecast Volume
(includes study area generated
traffic on an alternative roadway
system with a RI\RO at Boutwell
Road and County Road 12 plus Deer
Path and Brick Street converted to
one-way pair and traffic calming on
Maryknoll Drive)
-000- = 2015 ADT Forecast Volume
(includes study area generated
traffic on an alternative roadway
system with a RI\RO at Boutwell
Road and County Road 12 plus
restricted left-turns to and from Deer
Path at Olive Street and traffic
calming on Maryknoll Drive)
22
... _.. _ _ _ .. _ IiiiI 1Iiii. 1iiiI_ 1iiiiI." _ II1II == == ,. I!!I!I
Deer Path "Through" Traffic Mitigation
Alternatives to Consider
23
_ .... iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii iiiii _ _. iiiiiiI Iiiiiiiliiiiii - - - - ~Iiliil "
Deer Path Alternatives Evaluation
"."l1li :-:: 0iII
.==
.A ~~ t:'
~"'___ ~1 -~.dO oM ". .--__ ....~ =: =.: .::.;:;; ..-
~ffiTI1h~~
..
I "'l' "",....t7fi .. .. .Jh~ m "li1':!J fu--gJ "n
l.!.i.!~!I..!.t..~ II!J ' ....... "t! '-..... · '., '-ll . ... . U I · 'fJjl
I ~1IJ(9(f1) II ~ I;(j;m~ I
'" ~ ~~~,:,~{f.'.4E~
126,500
"i ?'W.. ""- ~
Poor,
~ 'h4
"t:',' $50 000 ; ,,"',
""" ,
126,500
, ' ,
Poor
~ &-" ~"
~~ - "'" "'''''''''"''
$150,000
73,250
,
Fair
Poor
~.
,'~
(ft) _ftt.Jiil'iJS~<<m1~cnmv~
~ tdl~~~.,m'~~~dIiumt;:Iim~
~
~
1~l!rl,,;m::",I<i.~
24
- - - - - -- -- ~ - D!!I- -- - .. .. .. - iiiiii
Dee' Path "Through" Traffic litigation Alternatives
Decision Process
!!'!l!!"!!'!'I'!
if-'
Close one end
of Deer Path
Shifts all"through"
traffic to Brick Street
and/or Maryknoll Dr,
...
Traffic Calming \
needed on Maryknoll !,
to limit through traffic p
..
-
l!!'!!l ,.
-.
~ -: .,~
_..... _ r ""J.:...l...L ~
Increased 3". Designate Brick Street
Traffic Law = as MSA or CSAH for
Enforcement Improvement Funding
- ".-',*"lj
~ry;~t~
7it
.
Long Range Option '
Redevelop Brick Street ill
(purchase and remove i
existing homes)
Shift Brick Street
roadway to the west
(more front yard)
~~~
~
fililll~
r
~
Should traffic be reduced on Deer Path?
YES
."..,..A",~
NO
\-'1
p,~
~I~~ I~
Designate Deer Path as Do Nothing
I
Collector Street and Improve l' (traffic volume may double)
~~
Restrict Deer Path
Traffic Movements
,
;c
:- ~~~_e _':"}:)~~~~ .~~~. ,,< ~ _:~~~
Restrict Left-Turns I. Convert to One-Way .
at Olive Street ... alone or as One-Way t
(as tested in 1999) ~ Pair wI Brick Street
~~~.
.
Install
Traffic Calming
Measures
Traffic Calming
needed on Deer Path
and Brick Street
"~,f.
.
-......... -....--.......... --1
Increased
Traffic Law
Enforcement
.1
Add Traffic Control
at Olive Street
and Myrtle Street
Incl\:.\\~l.d
Traffic Law
Enfo. ",,'I.~..t
-]
Install
Traffic Calming
Measures
!II
t .,
Allows roadway narrowing
(more front yard and room
for sidewalks/lan";\:il.ct~'ing)
Install
Traffic Calming
Measures
'l"-__-]
Increased
Traffic Law
Enforcement
Traffic Calming
needed on Deer Path
and Brick Street
-'-"'-l
Increased
Traffic Law
Enforcemem ...
25
-
]
I
I
-
.;,;- 1'-'
- - - - - - - .,.-~ - - - - - -
· Deer Path and Brick Street Area Overview
,
iiii
;t")--~";-<i."" ,""
III
26
__ __ -. iiii _ .iiii _ iiii_ _iiii ______ _ iiii. __ iiii _1iIiI __ __ .. .. ~ IiIiI
Neal Avenue Conn~ection to CSAH 12
Alternatives Evaluation
IlIi ill = iIIII nil
...~v.. ........ ..... .IR.... .......~...."rft(l
'j>,. ...... ". .," '. .......v...... .--. .:........""., "f,/'
. , . . ." ... ".
t\\~. , · [ftmIrD ;m,~nm
~tm~~~. ~m_~~_
tfug~~~EmIft.Iit\f~n~~-~nmm
- .~.~~- ~~
27
..
1iiiiiiI.. Iiiiii IiiiiiiI IiiiiiiI IiiiiiiI _ _ _. _ _ - -
-
-
-..
-
Approach and Action Plan
!!........._.;.-....;.",;...........~ ..
I
..- -----
----,
o
28
liiiiilliiiilliiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiliiiil_______
. .
Approach and Action Plan
- -
-.-
>
29
-,- - - -
Boutwell Area
-
-----.----
Preliminary Transportation
~s=m -;I~
" /
\;;
~-
_J
I I I
~ IIIwtt =I~
I
I
-
II
..
I
. = existing or future traffic signal
o = existing or future full access
.
.{
= restricted access intersection
~
~
= potential modern roundabout
fa~l
i.i~~i~
"
-L
\'
,'.
/-1
(' )
',)
rJ"~"'r ';"\' .."
30
_ _ _ __ _ ._ _ _. lIiii...iiiiiiit. iiiI _ IiiiiiiiiI _
. ~-
Study Area Recommendations
--
&\
..
~,
~~~~'
;,,:,~
''0' ~
rrJa
{B,
~
-
-
.
IIIIIIII
.'" 'I J ,. J W . J l.1;~ ~.l
='=r~1~=J!J~~fm1fhsf!!'l~~'1i),"~'m~~~
:" ~. .. . 1(ij)(mI9 . . :. "iB'lmr'i.
~. ., .'. ~'lCo)nu~~fb1.fl'l"'1~~flfilId1
~I' . '.. m :. ..' .. . ~ ,.~o- .- ~. '. .< .
""''';~'liilfiP lIii
~. 'r
'"
~b.'im~(lj)~mm
-:;'
JDm1Iil9lm8J~~~~~~~~fllIlImlm:4(S~
~----wlIffi~~. .. . ..
31
-
-. - - - - - - -.- - - - -
Study Area Recommendations
-......
~-
,- I · ;:.J .~. i U'" illID.!
J ~ ~.i..", .P
.. _ ...oIl _ - ....- _ ""-I'"
fie
~
~
i, 'imJ.~~~lm~~~~cmllil.
~ .. .. ... mmlli18m'.. .. - ~~.nn'ld~lJmm~C!11'
~M1fm~~ II
32
- -.. - -- - - - - -. - - - - - - - ~ -
}
Traffic Calming Tool Box Examples
~~
~~
~
.,
~~
:ir"
~;r"
7.",,' Ufi
~fR. '"
. !,,~.7,~- .jC'-" ....~. ~ ~-~,-~,..,
'=' \1
,;.~; .,~'
.~
~ :t"'.-,:;P!~
...... ~~
33
I _ I!!!!!!!. ~ .I!!!!!!L !!!!!!!! - .1IIl -- .. ==1; ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ e.
Traffic Calming Tool Box Examples
L-=twc~ lllUJIJ]
~
~~
34
- -,.. - -------- ----- ..... - - - - - - ~ -
"Through" Traffic Mitigation Action Acceptance
r
'''"<':1'
;(
35
f'
I
.
.
.
ti~lnem~ 0
iivl'
iu:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director V
September 29, 2004
Review of Substandard Lot of Record for Development. Case No.
Vj04-80.
fr'Jm:
Cute:
SdJject:
bz.ckground. The City Zoning Ordinance specifies City Council review of substandard
10LS of record (see attached).
;~,.~\'iew. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their meeting of
Sq)tember 13, 2004 and recommended approval of the request. The owners show a
pi-In for development of the site that meets setback standards for the RB Zoning
ch:signation.
h,'commendation: Approval of variance.
I-\Lt:lchments: CPC staff report and minutes of 9-13-04
~ 31-1
STILLWATER CODE
Front yard: 50 feet when not within
a PUp.
d.-Rcaryard: 25 feet when not within a
PUD.
Building and impervious surfaces:
60 percent when not within a PUD.
Landscaping and open space: 40 per-
cent when not within a PUD.
g. Additional setback requirements:
When a property within this district
is directly across a street or thorough-
fare or adjacent to any residential
district, all parking and loading fa-
cilities must be at least 20 feet from
3u roperly line and buildings and
st~~l tures at least 20 feet from the
. -..- .' t. The setback space must be
permanently landscaped.
h. Other requirements: All uses shall
be conducted wholly within com-
pletely enclosed buildings, except for
service stations, parking facilities and
other outdoor. uses when appropri-
. ately located and designed as ap-
. proved by the planning commission.
(4) Design permit. A design review permit is
required for all village commercial uses.
The country village architectural and de-
sign guidelines, set forth in Exhibit E to
the Orderly Annexation Agreement be-
tween the City and Town of Stillwater,
dated August 16, 1996, are the standards
that must be applied to this design re-
view.
(5) Planned unit development. These develop-
ment requirements may be modified based
on an acceptable planned unit develop-
ment for the entire village commercial
district area.
(Ord. No. 830, 9-3-96)
Subd. 24. Supplementary regulations. Supple-
mentary regulations governing this section are as
follows: -
Exceptions, additions or modifications. The pro-
visions of this subdivision are subject to the
exceptions, additions or modifications as set
forth in the following:
(1) Essential services. Essential services, as
defined in this subdivision, are permitted
in all districts.
c.
(.'.
f.
=-~~~
Supp. No. 12
JlIIIIIU. "IJi 1111.,1,.IIII~ I, I j
(2) Soil stripping. No person may strip, exca-
vate or otherwise remove topsoil for sale,
or for use other than on the. premises from
which it is taken, except in connection
with the construction or alteration of a
~;Jd.iag ea taQ prQ......;"~!'l Rnfl Rny inciflpn-
tal excavation or grading.
(3) Vacant lots of record. Notwithstanding
the limitations imposed by any other pro-
visions of this subdivision, the ~ counc.il
~it erection of a dwelling on any
lot (except a lot in an industrial district),
separately owned or under contract of
sale and containing, on May 1, 1974, an
area or width smaller than that required
for a one-family dwelling, provided that
\ municipal sewer and water service is avail-
~ble to the site.
(4) Clear c~. ~. <l wu.c. Iv~ ;U <l
residential district no fence, wall, hedge
or other structure or planting more than
42 inches in height may be erected, placed
or maintained within the triangular area
formed by the intersecting street lines
and a straight line adjoining the street
lines at points which are 40 feet distant
from the point of intersection, provided
that this regulation does not apply to
trees trimmed to a height of eight feet
above the street grade level.
(Ord. No. 917, ~ Ib, 2-5-02)
(5) Substandard lots. No lot, yard, court or
other open space, already containing less
area than the minimum required under
this subdivision, may be further divided
or reduced.
(6) Bed and breakfast. The city council recog-
nizes that bed and breakfasts are an asset
to the: community and help the preserva-
tion of historic homes because the ex-
pense of owning and maintaining historic
homes has made them less suitable for
single-family dwellings. Conversion of his-
toric houses into multifamily uses is usu-
ally determined by the neighborhood where
it is located. It is therefore the intention of
the city to limit bed and breakfast uses to
those homes where the use would benefit
CD31:56
"
\
It
'\
.
I
,~
.
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
September 13, 2004
Mr. Peroceschi moved to deny the variance. Mr. Ranum seconded the motion. During discussion,
Mr. Middleton pointed out that even if Mr. Bagaas removed the storage shed, the existing
retaining wall creates a problem for construction a garage if a variance is not granted. Mr. Junker
also noted there is no problem with line of sight. Motion to deny failed 5-3, with Mr. Peroceschi,
Mr. Ranum and Mr. Teske voting in favor of denial.
Mr. Turnquist moved to approve the variance. Mr. Middleton seconded the motion. Motion to
approve the modified variance passed 5-3, with Mr. Peroceschi, Mr. Ranum and Mr. Teske
voting against.
Case No. V/04-80 A variance to the lot size regulations (7,500 square feet required, 6,732 square
feet requested) for construction of a residence with attached garage at 927 6th Ave. S. in the RB,
Two Family Residential District. Jennifer and Tom Grahek, applicants.
Mr. Grahek was present. He explained the proposal is to construct a story and one-half house.
Originally, the plan was for an attached garage. Now, the proposal is for a detached garage. The
proposed 20' setback is consistent with most houses in the area, he said. The garage would
utilize the same driveway, and the footprint of the new structure would be the same as the
. previous structure that was removed due to a fire.
Mr. Russell noted that the action is to make a recommendation to the City Council, as the
Council has final authority in this instance. Mr. Junker suggested the proposal represents an
improvement to the neighborhood and moved to recommend the Council approve the variance.
Mr. Peroceschi seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously.
Case. No. SUPN/04-81 A special use permit and variance to parking requirements for location
of a temporary sales trailer in the Maple Island Hardware parking lot, 225 N. Main St. in the
CBD, Central Business District. Four Star Development, applicant.
Vern Stefan, Maple Island Hardware, and Dave May, representing Four Star Development
(Stillwater Mills on Main), were present. Mr. Stefan pointed out that he does not represent Four
Star Development as indicated in the agenda packet. Mr; Stefan said the developer came to him
. with the request to locate their sales trailer in his parking lot.
Mr. Ranum said he though the development company had a sales office above the Chamber
Office on Main Street. Mr. May responded that space is a design center; the trailer would be
more convenient for use as a sales center, he said. Mr. Junker asked about the former Sammie's
building. Mr. May stated that would not be available until next spring. Mr. Teske questioned the
advantage of a trailer when other office spaces are for lease in the area. Mr. May said the trailer
would have the advantage of visibility.
.
2
~.'---
,
.~..
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. Vj04-80
.
Planning Commission Date: September 13, 2004
Project Location:. 926 South Sixth Avenue
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: Jennifer and Tom Grahek
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: A variance to the lot size regulation (7,500square feet required,
6,732 square feet requested) for the construction of a residence with an attached
garage.
Discussion:
The applicant is requesting a Variance to the lot size regulation of 7,500 square feet for
a single family residence in the RB zoning district. This lot is a nonconforming lot size .
of 6,732 square feet. There was a house on this property. The house had a fire in it
about a year ago and subsequently was demolished. The house and attached garage
that are proposed to be constructed on this vacant lot would not require any Variances
to the building setback requirements. The RB district allows a prevailing setback of the
house if the surrounding houses are closer than 30 feet to the front yard setback, but
not closer than 20 feet to the front property line.
Recommendation: Approval with conditions
Conditions of Approval:
1. Utility easements shall be provided.
.
Findings:
1. That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act ofthe owner, exists.
In this context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and
neighboring violations are not hardships justifying a variance.
2. That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same
vicinity; and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the
recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors:
L,;/C,
7-/3
~-2J
.
"
-'
.
.
.
3. That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
property and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public
interest nor adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments: Application Form/Statement from Applicant/Site Plan
,. '. ..
PI~ANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
Y4"
Case No: V oq..~
Date Filed: .J./d'1 'Fz
Fee Paid: :tI ~
Receipt No.: ____
ACTION REQUESTED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER .M~55082..
X".
Special/Conditional Use ~e
Variance' . . .
Resubdivision '
Subdivision.
Comprehensive Plan Amen
Zoning Amendment.
Planning Unit Deveolopment
Certificate of Compliance
The fees for requested action are attached to this application.
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting mate
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies
supporting material is required. A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete applici
supporting material will delay the application process.
PROPE.RTY IDENT'F~CA~'ON .. .. ...
AddressofProjectC}2.1 lb't.~F\vE 50 Assessor's Parcel No. 3L/o30d-OddoO
o f2 ' (GEO Code)
Zoning District "D . Description of Project ('\) e who ~ e.. Con <3i.- r u c.. 't .'0 'r\
"/ hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewi
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will corr
the permit if it is granted and used. "
Property Owner :r~ 1\ f\ t -Fe. r- G r a~ e.., k
Mailing Address 2.00':). 0", "0 f ~ Ave IV,
. l . .
. , .
City-Sfate-'ZipSi-,l.lWat:e... 'Mn Ssoea-'
Telephone No. ~S I.. 4 ~iD - 80loCo
Signature ('OJ,.1I ~P/) ",djJ'~" Jt."o
t(Signatu~; is required) 0... o. .
Representative T () rY\ G fc?. F\ l-\ E 'r(
Mailing Address.2()O~ OR/lJl..€ '.iVE' tV I
. City-Stat~'-ZiPST/~LW.A-rER.., ~rV S~
Telephone No. fp 5/ -!/ 3~ - B 0 10&
Signature ~uYYl ~,
(Signature is required)
Lot Size (dimensions) S'J x 13 ~
Land Area (s)) 7.3 2. SC\"fT:'
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal , J /2..
Accessory
Feet /
2.5
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area sAe .
Existing square f::r
. Proposed 18 '} :>-. square feet
Pav~d Impervious Area square feet
No. 'of off-street parking spaces
H;\mOlamara\shella\Pl:ANAPP.FRM May I, 2003
...
"
"
.
.
.
I
4
'35
26
'35
2j,.",
t
~
,35
24
'35
2i>o",
'35
r
~ REFERENCe UNE I
22 '35
~151
'35
t
4
.~ . .la~'
2~,,,,
'35
J
24
13"-
--J-
23
.,,.,.
135
2~'.&O1
'35
_~6 '35
8
t
~
15
'35
134112
",4""
'3....
23
4X"9)
'34.5
22
pial
'34.5
21
oflOl7)
Location Map
'35
~,
'35
~,
'35
Ii
t Ii
4 Ii
1
7
'35
:"",
'35
.
.<
Ii
9 ...,.. 25 I ;
'35 1,\l.o"
'35
~l
Ii
o
<0
~1211 0 30
'35 + i!:
2 Ii :J
o
C/)
'35
~U2l)
'35
o
~
4
Ii
'35
~'2Ol
'35 t Ii
6 4 Ii
'35
~1301
tli ~ Ii!
r;~ 33
<(
'35
~t31)
'35
o
~
10
'35
tli
1)'32) 4 Ii
1:\."
12
'35
'34'/2
1
poll
134.5
2
po21
'34.5
3
po3l
'34.5
t Ii!
4
4
134.4
L
""'"
g
'il
N
!;i
. IE!
IE!
il
~>
~I
III
'I ..
/~
I
1/18
1~ -
" "'~
,~~
\.
lIS
~l
115
'&...:.5
-,.. 4' ,v
\ -b
\ ~.
./~
/\ ~0I
%~ %.~
~..! ~
~~ -?
P"
."...!
e
i ~
"
i!
o
~
liS \ =, lIS
~,,~tI-
~...._ li!
, " '.to..."
. 81-^_ .
. ... --~-
REF~~E UNE \
.
,
115
-t'
If
33
."....
264
VAC 146 DEEDS PG 2~ l
VAC556340
''lt~
17." '5~
. ~04
APPARENT......'2B~1 .~'
GAP # ',"I,
...J;. HUD80N RT
VACBK 146DEEDSPG6'~ 4
I '32 1J.,.. {
Ii!
/
o 13
'- 1 ~
~ ~I it \
~~~ : :"{
~.:~~~
7 I ;; g
;; 17
fP''''
fil
.>1 1.4.
,~: '35 J:
"""1 12 :,r--i
135 135 ~J ....... ----
1~'3) ~~Ii
135 ./ tPJOSl
'10 ,,35
17;/ 14_c.
+-"16~ r- - '~,., fli
~m 125 ~ ~
i
t 28 t
-r; - ",..,1
--f--~ .--1
'32
'32
1
fP''''
Ii!
2
~
14
,1""') 1 '"
.J
""'"
fil
13
~-
liJ:
~
liCi5
Ii!
30
t;~
'\;31.
'3'
~,'"
t~
y,~
'35 , t '35
1~1'" -......J.. ~)'"
135 ~ 135
~'"
30
Ii!
Ii!
J.
.f
33 Ii!
o
It>
;;
~
;;
11
fP'Z"
8
~21)
o
~t
;;
;;
/'
"
Ii!
}
"
,p3Ol5
9
10
fP'22'
Ii!
66
'32
'32
'32
leu UE'
'32
18
~
W ;; .fi,.,
:J ~
;;y;;
<0
<0
EAST
<0
<0
Ii!
'32
18
~71)
'32
1
~'2I
Ii!
Ii!
66
/ /
";
;;
16
fP''''
l-
I
,.
{
~
"
{
15
~. .014-
14 "'" I."
fil/
16
fIlOOII
15
t~
fP'D) · II
!! 5 III
r J:
li:
6 I III u:
"...
/
III
g/ "14
III
13
,.,...,
g
13
"""
~
I
;;
12
7
;;
12
""'"
;;
}
"
N
11
PO"
8
po31
11
;;
;;
$
10
fI'7"Zl
9
pl1
10
,.,...,
Ii!
66
Ii!
'32
'32
'32
<0
-
EAST
BURLING
<0
-
~IW R-'lQW RI9W
jnr<
nlN \nlS
, ~....RElt!
nns. 'r=-
nos nos
~MS T:!C\
nrnlj n~
nm
i
I
I
\
\
\
1U2\\' IUIW R..,."OW
Vicinity Map
.
1
~...~.,....
w~..'.~n .
.T)! .
o
145
Scale in Feet
"
,
I
~
I
................,.....d.catIlfIIlIDl
"~otlarl4~.....,
'"*'... ~W"NrISJ'Dl'l 0tN't gIIjl;:M.
1M .............'-undforrJWWO
....-._. W~CDPtllrd
-.-..~fat...,~.
___w........~......,....Olfp
.......(lStl4>>N7S
....-...~IlIIN!JM>>~
0Ilftl'II~",,"2l104
...."..... AugudZ1.JClO4
Location Map
":
.
R2tW R..."OW Rt9W
132N1 J 13~~
13tNI. ~ T31N
1301' ~ - ~~~~
-1 f
:W:
R1:!:W R21 W R-"l()W
Vicinity Map
..
o
100
Scale in Feet
1lllt..... "1M ,... fII. ........
.... .., ... aI""'___"'~
.......___W~CcMtt
...........,.....,,._..-
,..,...00+. W.......eountr..1ICII
MIpOIIlMl...",~
==:=~~crr-
PwCIIIIW8.....,_A$IOO~
=-..~~3~=
..
v/
.
To: City of Stillwater Planning Commission
Date: August 27, 2004
Reason: Variance
From: Jennifer Grahek
2005 Oriole Ave. N.
Sillwater, Mn. 55082
Reference: Lot address is 927 6th Ave. So., Stillwater, Mn.
This is a variance request for building a new home on a non-conforming lot.
A previous house on this property burned down approximately one year ago.
The proposed home design is a 1-12 story house, attached garage with a front
porch and that will fit the character of the neighborhood. The porch has a
20-foot set back from the front of the lot and is in-line with other homes on
the street.
Regards,
. ~~ ~}~J)j7
Jennifer Grahek
.
/3 'G.'
~. .
,l
G n\<..RGE
~f
-( d- J!
.
~f
-!-
-'\
.
.
.)J
'?
......-
d.
a
,.~
-....
. E "-:,t.V Iq- TED .,
I.:) ii 'J W: ~'\,) 0 0 Wi
If t 1\
I !
=- 13.1
) 0'_
p..>
, 0'
,. ~
( .
i
\~ , V
,
I~ SI' ~I
q;Al &;~ 'AvE 51 5"t re.e.. L
,~ ~
---
').,
I
...., ;
~
,'.
~
\'
~
1
!
-,.
/.
2.81
400SE
J::.
o
'~
\,
10'
-;
/'
H€"I C::.f.lt i'
').oS'
~
;. ..r---'!\!
i
,
;
-.-- -- .
!
POR.tri
',~ ..../
.
.
.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council ~
Steve Russell[ Community Development Director'
September 29[ 2004
Final PUD Approval and Variance to Height Limit for Construction of 36
Unit[ Building No.5 Condominium Building. Case No. PUD-F/V/04-84.
Background: The Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD request at their
meeting of September 13[ 2004 and the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed
the final plans at their meeting of September 8[ 2004. Both bodies recommended
approval with conditions (attached).
The proposed height of the building requires a variance. The allowed height based on
the Central Business District[ CBD[ regulations four stories and 50 feet. The proposed
building is four stories and 54 feet.
As shown on the plans, the site and building step up from Main Street where the
structures is two stories to four stories to the rear. The building size is similar to
Building 2 and 3.
Recommendation: Decision on request.
Attachments: CPC 9-13-04 staff report and plans.
'.
t/
Memo
.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
September 9, 2004
Final PUD Approval and Variance to Height Requirements, 50 feet and
4 Stories Required,S Stories 52 feet Proposed. Case No. PUD-F/V/04-
84.
Background. The Terra Springs PUD concept review was approved by the City Council
June 3, 2003 (see PUD conditions of approval attached).
Previously, Building No.1, 2, 3, and 4 have received final PUD approval. As a condition
of concept PUD approval, Site No.5 was conditioned to 4 stories and 50 feet (the
height limit of the Central Business District, CBD). Concept PUD approval was for 42
units, 36 are proposed in the application.
.
Parking requirements for the 36 housing units are proVided for (72 spaces required, 81
provided) .
Originally the proposal was for 4 levels of housing over 1 level of parking to the rear
and retail space along the street front of the building. The 6,000 square feet of retail
use has been eliminated from the revised plans. The PUD concept approval indicated
that any variances to height limits would be review on a site specific basis. The building
design with the two story front building element helps mitigate the height as viewed
from the street.
On September 8, 2004, the Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the design of
Site No.5. They approved the building design with conditions (see attached staff report
and conditions of approval).
Recommendation: Approval
Attachments: Application and plans, staff report PUD/04-06
CPC Action on 9/13/04: +6-1 Approval .
.
a8/30/2004 11:16
6514308810
CITY OF STILLWATER
PAGE 01/02
"
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
.c.as~ No:
Date Flied:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.:
.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
. STILLWATER MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
SpeciaJlConditionalUsePermit
Variance. ..
Resubdivision
Subdivision.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment...
Zoning Amendment* .
~ Planning Unit Development *
/' Certificate of Compliance
The fees for requested action are a Hached to this application.
"An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted wIth application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copIes of
supporting material;s required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of
supporting materia/Is required. A site plan Is required with applications. Any incomplete application or
supporting material will delay the application process. .
.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project-.iP so ...1. 4 A-..J. S-rrL..-_. \ Assessor's Parcel No.
T~Sf~~
Zoning District Pu D Description of Project ~<.o O~. IT ...\~w
(GEO Code)
(_'.:.IN~~ c...T1.~
'" hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects6 to the best of my know/edge and belief, to be true and correct. 'further certify' will comply witJ
the permit jf it is granted and used. "
F~.!lc\.\. S~~
Property Owner ~~ ~......3~~
. MailingAddress'/~J,~ '7~* ~'T1Z.6ST"
Representative.~. "6.:li.F1 I A..~'f!.F
Mailing Address qoo ;.1. ~~ 'S~.
City - State - Zip f::,Lco1'..t~~ : '1 N. b S4:S~
Telephone No. 95'2. ~2..\' ~'lCOo
City - State - Zip -"'1. ..J,l~~ ~ I M to! -5S".Llo I
Telephone No. "\1... ~~'6. ? ('~
Signature
Signature
~.o ~
f-
(Signature Is required)
(Signature is required)
H :\mcnamara\Sheila\PlANAPP .FRM
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Tolal Building floor area \051'2..\'Z- square feet
Existing sZ5 square feet
Proposed \05" ~ square feet
Paved Impervious Area $ZS square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces 108 .u 1M,;'
"FO(... T.e;ll#
'P '" 0
. Lot Size (dimensions~:;Ox ~
Land Area ~8: S-G.i ~G.>><Vl~ ~.(..","I 1:
Height of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal "i 56'-0 II
Cf~'E Accessory l \\,~II
May 1, 2003
. ,I
--
I
I
I
I
I
1.., .~
~ 1~ .. .. '7 i- I
I .- I .~
". J i
... r ~ ~
...j I , . e-l ". ..... .....,
"~i ... I
..
EAST STIlLWATER \
I-'~ J ~ i~ I ...
-l '.- ;. ... '.
L I' ... -
..
.- .~ .
I , ~.. t~ '. 1-1 . -,
i'= .... ~ .... ..'~ =
- . .- I .- 3
, ; .. z z
I , . .~ .... ol.
IO .. I
.
. ~
. ..
-
-
-
... 1t .
l- ; I ~
. -
.
l- ~
A~
. ~
...
. .. ..,,= ...
,
::1 ~. ..-
..
...
. .
.. ..
... .
~
.....
.
. .
1
...
.
...
/ EAST I
i - i :~~I ~ ~.I-l ~ ~~~..~ ,;
- 0 lU ~.~ y ...
'i'.' e.., -, , I
! - ~., ...~.
1- --- , .. "Y'~......
I t1.. J .. .
-": j j i-, ~ : i- 1 ...' tii .
- -=.... .. .!!L. s:
/~ EAST ASPeH s~ . . Couc..TCllftIllCf...I\A'1 CQ
j.:.J,. .
" ,
~-S~~& 0
I' ,5' ;~
,:. J, ,
I _ I .'.
WIUCINS
STllEET
.... 'I .. t
. J. ...
.... ....-- ~.. II! ;.
~- f ~ ,i. ;:
... '"0 ~
fa ~w -
~.~ . ~ :---.
a.. ..,-- ..:!. t '1 II!
· "l~"'""~~", t 1
, "" ooc..... 'l
I
I
.-
...
IloCoc.tIOtnufl1.lll\A"
LA
J:,'" ~w Rt9W
:~:
~.~ .~_.-=
= 11=
=w=
k::\\" R.:l W lUOW
Vicinity Map
i
,.'"\0. .
.---~~~
f~
.
o
I
302
Scale In Feet
..--.~...--,,~~-- ..
=--==~:;r=-
::'::-:"'--:'''::=c...rrIlM
..............-----
...."'.....-ew...,~c...
.......~1J<ONnS
.............. ........"..........
..............-.,...,J\1CaI
......... ......,-=
AUG-27-2004 09:52
"1ES SALES
6128527702
P,r
August 27, 2004
Ms. S\le Fitzgerald
City Hall
216 N. 4th Street ,.
Stillwater; MN55082
Re: Territorial Place
Dear Ms. Fitzgerald:
. .
RiverView is a 36 unit new construction condominium complex. located
within the Terra Springs Planned Unit Development. The proposed building
is four stories tall and including one level of underground parking, Exterior
cladding materials include St. Croix limestone, brick, EIFS, fiber cement
board shingle~style siding, and asphalt shingles.
The landscape and lighting plans for RiverView are a continuation of the
entire Terra Springs Development. Brick pavers are being used in the
walkways around'the building including the site's interpretive trail. The
lighting design includes decorative antique fixtures adjacent to streets, double
head shoe box luminaries at the surface parking lots, recessed stair lights at all
individual unit entries, decorative lantern luminaries at the main entrance, and
bollard lighting at points along the interpretive u:ail. Security wall pack lights
are also being used at both the Mve into the und,erground parking garage and
at the stairways on the west and north side of the building,
If you should need anything else or have any questions, please feel free to
contact me. \
Sincerely,
.1\{::3( $ ,
. Matthew Brinta ~.
J. Buxell Architecture
TOTAL P.03
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. DRl04.53
.
Heritage Preservation Date: September 8,,20q4
'Project Location:. 650 North Main Street.
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Jack Buxell- J.Boxell Architecture representing Frauenshuh
Sweeney
Type of Appli'cation: Design Review
Project Description: Design review of a 36 unit condominium (Riverview) in the Terra
Springs development.
Discussion:
The applicant is requesting design review and approval for Building 5, the final building
in the Terra Springs Development. The proposed 36 unit building is four stories tall,
including one level of underground parking. The mate.rials and design is consistent with .
the established range of materials used at the adjacent building in the development.
Exterior cladding materials include St. Croix Limestone, brick, EIFS, fiber cement board
shingle-style siding and asphalt shingles. Landscaping, lighting and light fixtures will
match the existing.
The applicant will be requesting a Variance from the Planning Commission on
September 13, 2004. The Variance is to the height of the building. 50 feet high is
permitted, they are asking for 52 feet.
Recommendation:
Approval as conditioned.
Conditions of Approval: .
1. All utilities shall be completely screened from public view.
2. A lighting plan showing the fixture type, height, location and exterior lighting intensity
shall be submitted with building permit plans for Planning Director approval. All
lighting shall be directed away from the street and adjacent properties. Light
sources shall be shielded from direct view and protected form damage by vehicles.
3. All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection. No
project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission.
4. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from
landscape areas. .
.
.
.
5. Handicapped parking spaces and signage, in compliance with State requirements,
shall be shown on building permit plans and installed before final inspection of the
project.
6. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from
the public street.. . _ . . '..
7:' .The trash.enclosure shall be made of a sturgy opaqU"e masonry material, with trash -'_
.. receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and materials of the
project.
8. No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public.
9. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the
adjacent surface.
10. Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance. Construction
during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems.
11. A sign permit shall be required for all project signs.
12. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits
are issued.
13. Sign package to be approved by the Heritage PreselVation Commission, including
directional signs.
14. Exterlor lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation
Commission.
15. All security lights on building shall be downlit.
16.A sign permit is required for signage.
17.AII exterior. modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by the Heritage
PreselVation Commission. .
1 a. Thi1e~t*t>r h' of e
l,g(oJ.()d.V 1
Findings: The proposal meets the intent of the Downtown Design Guidelines.
Attachments: Application Form/Letter/Preliminary Construction Documents
-- /
Memo
..
/):, -c-
.-
/'
'.
.
" ,
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, (:ommunity Development Director
May 28, 2003
Concept PUD Approval for Multi Phased 227 Unit Mixed Use. Terra
Springs Development, Terra Springs LLC, applicant. Case No.
PUDj03-27.
0/
t
;V
The application before the Council is concept PUD approval for the 227 unit Terra
Springs Project. The site is located in the Central Business District, CSO, and is a
Planned Unit Development aI/owing flexibility of design.
The 227 units are contained in five (5) buildings. Three of the buildings, 1, 2 and 4, .
will be a part of Phase I development starting in August. Buildings 3 and 5 will follow.
All the ~ulldings wlll require HPe design review and final PUD Co~ncil review. . The . .
HPC reVIewed the plans at their meeting of April 7 and the Plannlng'Commisslon
reviewed the plans and recommended concept approval on April 14, 2003. A site plan
and building elevations are attached. The height of the prposed buildings are: No. 1 _
19 HU's - 45 feet, No.2 - 44 HU's - 4 stories,~ feet, No.3 - 90 HU's proposed 8
stories 95 feet, conditional 6 stories. 60 feet, No.4 - 32 HU's - 3 stories, 45 feet and
,No.5 - pr9Pos~d42 HU'S,.5 stories' conditional 4 stories and 50 feet., ". " ,
An interpretative center and trail is proposed along with a substantial public green area
that retains the foundation of the old territorial prison manufacturing building. The
existing wayside shall be relocated along the interpretative trail.
, ,
" C~mme,nts from MnDOT 'were received. Staff ~rid the ~eveloper are addreSSing their
concerns. regarding site access. ': , ' " ..," ." , ' , . ,
An EAW was prepared for the project and considered seperately.
.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approved as consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Plan.
Attachments: Application, plans, staff report and. minutes from epe 4/14/03. .
_....0-.................. ...,,,, ,..1.., .,1......... ....,". ..., ",I.'..;."....~,i. 1"".0"". ...,_,., "'0' ."...,.......,,,,,,,. ,,,., .,;",..................... .j", .". .~......,.""......, ._.....
....-. ... .......... .......
r'L..-aNNING APPLICATION REVIEW-f .M
CASE NO. PUD/03-27
.
..
Planning Commission Date: April 14, 2003
..
Project Location: 608 North Main Street
. Comprehensiv:e. PI~n ~ist.rict: .D~wntowt:l :CC?mrn~rcial. -: .: ..
". . '. .' ..".. :. .'. '.. . : :..... . .' .' ,.'::.. ".: .". .::'. '. ... '. .
. .... .
Zoning il"istrict:' cab . .
",: .
Applicants Name: Terra Springs LLC
Type of Application: Concept Planned Unit Development.
Project Description: Concept Planned Unit Development review of Terra Springs project on 7.93 acre
site Including 227 housing units in five buildings, 4,000 square feet of office use, 9,000 square feet of
retail and 2.64 acres' public courtyard, open space, landscaping and interpretive trail.
Discussion: As previously presented, the City of Stillwater has selected a developer and is working with
that developer on plans for the infill/redevelopment of the old territorial prison site at 608 North Main
Street. 111e redevelopment site is the land inside wall that defines the perimeter of the site. Lands above
the wall will be retained by the city as part of its open space system.
As shown in the attached development plans the proposal is for five buildings,.builc:~ings 1-5 as described
below: . . . . .
'..
Building Date
Building 1
Two stories of residential over one level of half paring/half commercial
19 two story townhouses @1,500 sq. ft. average
Approximately 38 underground parking stalls (2/home)
7,000 sq. ft. commercial/historical interpretive.
Proposed approximate building height (floor one to roofline) 45 feet
Four stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking
44 condominiums @1,320 gross sq. ft. average
mix!Jf one and two story homes..-" ., .' '. . . _'
. .apprc:>x.}52. uhdergrou'nd parking stalis' (l.4/h,?m.e) ,:.. . ...: .: . .., '. .,.. .
. proposed approximate bullding height (grade 'to roofline) 60 feet
eight stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking
90 condominiums @ 1,2S0 gross sq. ft. average approx,
Approx. 153 underground parking stalls (1.7/home)
Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 95 feet
Three stores of residential over one partially underground level of parking
. 32 rental apartments @ 1,'350 gross sq~ ft. average. . . . .
Approximately 58 underground parking stalls (l.8/home) .
Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 45 feet
Building 2
'. '.
. .
Building 3
Building 4
.
Building 5
Four stories of residential over one level of parking and I doil
42 ren~. ....jJdrtments or for~sale condominium... ~_. ~OO sq. ft. average
Approximately 67 underground parking stalls (l.6/home)
6,000 sq. ft. commercial
~.
Totals
.
227 homes
13,000 sq. ft. commercial.
376 enclosed dedicated parking stalls
.. 145 o.n-~ite:. g~.e~t. P~.~~.l)g~p~~~~ . .
...:.. . . .: . :. ..". . -. -.
" ' TW6hOndred and tW~ly seven Iioti~ing u~its are'prOposecil~ the five bUildings. In addition, comme;
space of 13,000 square feet, 4,000 office and 9,000 retail is proposed.
Parking requirements for the residential use is two spaces per unit or 454 spaces. Commercial space
requirements is 58 spaces. Totaling 512 spaces. The plans show a total of 487 spaces, 342 covered t
145 surface. Public access to the green and trial system will also require parking as well as pedestriar
access. .
The proposed height of the buildings is not clear. The application indicates a maximum height of six
.stories and 65 feet. The height limit for the caD district is 50 feet.
The PUD would be developed in phases starting with 2003 and completing in 2005.
. .
The development plans include drainage and circulation have been reviewed by the city engineer, traft
consultant and fire chief. The circulation plan will be modified to address fire concerns for building
access. .
The con~pt design plans were reviewed by the HPC at their meeting of April 7, 2003. 'They aptvci!
building concepts proposed. The detailed building design will require design approval before a design
permit is issued.
Likewise, final PUD approval will require special building use description, compositiori of .resi~~ntial~[lr
and assigned parking. .The. park.ing ordinance .allowsfor modifications to the parking standards based (
a specific site. and use analysis.
The height of the proposed bUilding(s) may require a height variance. This will be reviewed when spec
building design plans are proposed for building permits.
As a part of the Proposal, an Interpretive balVfadlity plan .Is proposed. The specifics of ,thIs, plan/faclli~
.shou~d ~e. coordinated wit~ the par~ board/heritage 'p'reservatic;>h coriui1l~ion and ~~s~ingtor.couno/
. .Historical Commission..' '.. .,... ..... .. .'
EnvIronmental Review. A environmental review assessment worksheet, EAW, is required because the
site Is on the National Register of Historical Places. The EAW is attached and will be notified for revieVl
and comment.
Recommendation: Approval to Council
Attac;hments: Application and plans
.
CPC Action on 4/14/03: +5-1 approval
.
.
t '.'.'
.
" I
, ~: i '
.1; I
: I ' 'I
,': I ~ r II
: I ih ;:
" ..I 1 ~l.
. '. " I, . '
, .1 'I'.
.' .~.: ':, I II' .'
, I; i I ,!
I, j . :.
!-.: I :. I
l; l' Jj' ,. i
";; . :11: I
,:.,' ; 1. !: - 1
: : I ~~ ,!
:T;ij:i
, 1'1'1', '1
' "
: .It i I
J lit. r
I . I
I !~J. ~
041 I IJ-
I' ,
"'1' ,
I ,I 'I '
i' I' :
I : 1'1', 'j .. :
Ill1 Wn!\' 11J1YOR r ;11:.W,H'<:.7T
..
. '~~4~:~e::~S;~3 ~c:~s .. 29'homeslrJe ' .'.. -.'
. . .: '.'. .' . ". - .. ,. .. . '.
. .. .
.i"
.. -!.
~L-d i~~aetuJ)on th~ ~i~ ~h~.hoj~
Minimal impact.
In 227 tomes here, may see about 5 sch )ol-age children total,
'I' "',
I
I
I
I
~ratifl :ation of f1!sldential U.!UI
number of lomes
o
o
227
sIngle-f"ml/y detached
slngle-f..mJIy attached
multiple .family
,staatnc: .man .
Building 1 .
constructlo I start autumn 2003
OCC\lPMCy lutumn 2004
Building 2
constructlo I start autumn 2003
occupancy ate 2004/ear"Y 2005
Building 3
I
constructlo I start late 2003
occupancy ;prlng/summer 2005
constructlo I start autumn 2003
occupancy ;ummer 2004
conStl'\lctlo , start aut,;,;,n 2004
occupancy autumn 2005
Building 4
8ulldlng 5
91'088 s ~uaJ'~ fnotage of commercial 'Fr soace
3.3,000 : ,f.
resider Hal dwelUna unIts bv numbe"~f bedroom . .
227 un!:, i .
approx. unit mix: 80% 2-bedroom + 100" 3-bedroom ... 10% 1-bedroom or stu~io
equals : approx. 458 bedrooms
(
d
0610 'ON
I
d
: f
. : I I "1"1 -:
.:1 I " :
I,. jl
:' !",I :.
:, 'II: ,I
':', I' I:
I:. · 1 .
t... I. ,"
, . I: !
: ~ ; . .'.. .
"1 I, I
I' .
" :
il: . 1:1 ~ '
: I;
. I
.:
. . ',:...
....
I
. i
,
,
'I
,
.
'.
I
,
;.
il
.
"
'l
. !
':
,
,
'. I
:. I :
I I
. I
.
:'
:'
'. .
.
.,
, .
I
',I
i
I
.1
I
; ,
.' I;
,
,,/.:
I . ~
.1 :
i i I ~ I
k I "
. ~
,
~
t
..
.
!
~
, .
,
.,
~,
.
"
I .
!
. .
I
..
i .
..
.'
.
.
, '
I .
.
.'
I'
I
,
I
. I' :
~on? 'f! . '~,nli
. Terra Springs Development
Height Number of Units
Prooosed ADoroved Prooosed ADoroved
Building No. 1 3 stories - 45' 3 stories - 40' 19 18
Building No. 2* 4 stories - 60' 4 stories - 59' 44 40
Building No. 3* 6 stories - 60' 4 stories - 54' 90 $
Building No. 4 4 stories - 45' 4 stories - 49'11" 32 36
Building No. 5 4 stories - 50' ** 42 36
Total 227 177
.
.
*Approved as part of original concept PUD with Design Review
**Proposed 4 stories - 54'
I
, \
.
I
.
J
RlV Ji:RVIEW
AT TERRA SPRINGS
STILL WATER, MN
.
OWNER
ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING
AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
J. BUXELL ARCHITECTURE
900 N. 3RD STREET
MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55401
CONTACT: JACK BUXELL
PHONE: 612-338-3773
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
STRUCTURAL
HANUSCHAK CONSULTANTS
26 EDMONTON STREET
WINNIPEG. MB
CANADA, R3C 1 P7
CONTACT: BILL HANUSCHAK
PHONE: 204-956-2200
FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY
180 EAST 5TH ST. SUITE 160
ST. PAUL. MN 55101
CONTACT: BRIAN SWEENEY
PHONE: 651-291-3591
lB'
ARCHil
9C)~vR
~~r
:r. ~sl.m~
Cr".liS?A~ COMMU!'o'I"I'tES
AAOL'1'Ecrt."U
u.m:SCAP! A1lCU!:ECtT.nU:
GR.<n=
l_lIIlyo:p:ffI'1'rw.rn<lSDlI.A.~
~...:roo<OlI.'_l''''uwu"",
.r~~:~~~:tf
HARK RYAN
11428
__ ~....-..n.""'<""""""""'"
.....-............-......-
_""""........._............-v..._
.....-..-..."""..-.....-
......v...' _ _...,..__
REVISIONS:
~~
~ Z z
~ ~ ~~
> ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ :3
;;, ~ E:
;~CIJ
-
DEVELOPER.
RECEIVED
FR~UENSHUH
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
SEP
1-
(nOd
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
I
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE D8.3lO4
PROJECT NR 01026.50
DES[GNED JHB/lJ8
DRAWN HJ8
AQ,QQ
.
.
RIVERVIEW EXTERIOR MATERIALS
material
fiber cement board siding
brick
stone
glass
BUILDING FIVE AREA CALCULATIONS
residential gross square feet
enclosed parking gross square feet
residential net salable square feet
BUILDING FIVE RESIDENTIAL MIX
2-bedroom homes
2-bedroom plus den homes
3-bedroom homes
3-bedroom plus den homes
total number of units
.
total number of bedrooms
2-bedroom homes
2-bedroom plus den homes
3-bedroomhomes
3-bedroom plus den homes
!lverage home size
BUILDING FIVE PARKING DATA
enclosed underground
parking spaces
parking ratio
.
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECTURE, L TO
!'I'l~tfCR.ni nmtO Siit!.!T
MImI"EA1'CUS,~TA.~~1
I'EL'(6t2)J18.1171 fAX:~IZ)HI-~
-..._jbu:dl.~_
UIl.BA...i>t.A.....""mfO
cn."ISPACXCC~'Nrt$S
AR~;:t"',,'JS
~A.'touu...-n.'ll!.
ov.."lllCS
square feet
3,715
2,143
8,458
8,072
% of building
exterior
11%
7%
25%
25%
SHEET INDEX
AO,OO COVER SHEET
AD,01 SHEET INDEX
nGllIllYaIIlTII'YTlU.rnn--._.
~...TtOtIQlI.Z$I'OK'l'''''''~~
rt_OIt"_M"f~lI.~"'"
MfDrKo.rr_"f;1'LY~Sl)
AJl~__~...,,~ ..n&'-'~0'3&
n-4la-OI'MlM41oOr...
/'!ARK RYM
1142S
-- -_...-,._.~----....
......_........,..~..- ..,..-...
-.........-......-..-....-
.-..-.........-.-...--
..--~_.__.....-
75,564 square feet
29,648 square feet
LANDSCAPE
L5,00 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
L5.10 PHASING PLAN
L5.11 SITE PLAN
L5.12 DIMENSION PLAN
L5.13 SITE IRRIGATION PLAN
L5.14 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
L5.16 AMENITY PLAN
L5.17 PAVING PLAN
L5.19 SITE DETAILS
REVISIONS:
65,683 square feet
19
12
3
2
36
fLOOR PLANS
A 1.1 0 GARAGE PLAN
A 1.11 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A1.12 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A1.13 THIRD FLOOR PLAN
A1.14 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN
~ rs z
E:j~~
~ ~
> ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ :5
;, E-- E=
;~CI)
average s,f,
1,551 square feet
1,924 square feet
2,428 square feet
1,633 square feet
ID.J.llnlNG SECTIONS
A3.10 LONGITUDINAL SECTION
A3.11 TRANSVERSE SECTION
1,753 square feet
75 standard
3 tandem
81 total
f=XTERIOR ELEVATION!;),
A5.10 SOUTH ELEVATION
A5.11 EAST ELEVATION
A5.12 NORTH ELEVATION
A5.13 WEST ELEVATION
2,25 per ,2,welling unit
DEVELOPER:
FR<\UENSHL'H
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
SHEET INDEX
GENERAL NOTES
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE:
PROJEcr NR,
DESIGNED:
DRAWN
0/13104
01026.50
.J118,/'1lB
/'U8
AO,Ot
.
.
.
.
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE. L TO
~~~~.~~
Tl!t.'(('12)J:'::~~~~:1))3
URBAN P1..AI'llo'tNO
O~5P^Ce~=~
t.MlOSCN'eM~~
S:~~~~.;,=~
""~~~,~1o:f~~;:
.u~"o''''''''''r.IO'I'''-
~~
,~"n.'lIt.
',fI'l~ ~<'ftl.
,~.::2~1!~~~~_
~'
',--- 1---)
REVISIONS:
AOOF.NDUM 1-
~rs
.~Z ~
~~ .-
,......, Po4 ~
~rJJ.~
~ ~
~~~
>~==
~~~
DEVELOfER:
FRAUENSHUHI
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
AERIAL
PHOTOGRAPH
SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
DATE: 08-31-04 -
PROJECT NR: 0102~;::
DESIGNED: RS. KS .
DRAWN
: '. ,-~,:
,: ' '~~',~>,
L5.00
.
~
.
.
\
_i.'.'~""'" ;"",,;, .',~,'. ~,~,,,, i1.,...-....,
,.......:'.7........
"",.".-,~.GSi'.;~~':'-'~\"','~':"";:';:-':;
"~)""",.,..(,.(".",,
,..,;.,:.::'," i .;.:or;;T[:!
;,:;>:.;~(~-:;;;;J~ ,'P'P:i:
".,
',:,',':o::2!:.r:-;
;~'",'-';"ii';(;!i:~;
iN'!::':!;'!~'"
::)::~.;.:,-
:;..,'.:F;!~':)/-"""--- .
,','
',',
';'
\~
"
~,
~,
/
PHASING LIMITS ---------------
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -------------
NOTE: AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
o :~:~I~:o:LA~~
~ 0 10 20
i
40
SITE LIMITS LINE ALSO PERTAINS TO IRRIGATION LIMITS
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE, L TO
',lI*1 ..."OK(U rWKD STRfl:7
M::-.?>EA/'I)I.IS, MI~~ESOT A ~~"'ll
TFl.,'6l1lJ.I~._17n fAX,(/i1 UJ l~..lMl4l1
......w.llh..ell.c"""
!;KAM.P/",\:-'-Sl:--G
OPE:-'SP.~CE CnMMl "XrrIES
AIKIIITl'tCTt.'RE
'-'\SDSCAf'F. AROUTECn:RE
GRAPHICS
IH'u,.u.," ,:unl"l" hIArTHl< 1aA.'''''';
""'O:-"'".->.n<'Sn".."""u \Oi"'~""".""W
~'-\.lii""';"IlU_'t"lIlJlecr":"""I'''''''
..so n<,\t ,"-".. D1:LI' RtGlOTUlJiU
U'1'm:r~;~~~I-:::":E~~'~rn'T"E
Eff~;-7[*~!21?~~~t1
C)
R"F"V1~IQ\i't
ADDE:'oinU~1 I .
~~z
~~~
~~.~
>~~
~<<
r......l ~ ~
~~~
>~d
~E-<~
~~
DEVE-LOPER,
FRAUENSHUHl
S\VEENEY
BUILDINGS
PHASING PLAN
SCHEMA TIC
DESIGN
DATE:
PROJEG NR:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN
08.31.04
01026.50
JHB
RS,KS
L5.10
.
.
.
It-
8
SITE PLAN
Scale: l' = 20'.0"
~~~
FXISTING CB HIDDEN BY STONES -. ,.~,:.~ ';;.-'
~STREAMBEO _ _
~
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE. L TD
.~., ~'~\Rnf !lIlROS:-REE1"
Mr.-......F...\Pfil.ls. Ml~"XF.SOTA ~~~!ll
TFJ.'161 ~ ~'.l'_\ '7,1 FA.X.i 61 ~ l'''~ ~~\.I"
""".jb.",.ll.~unl
l'RIJA~Pf...'.'-MM'l
(!PF.~SPA("E Cf)MMl~ITIES
\RCUltECn:RE
l\:\OK.\PF.\/tCHITE("T1,"R.E
GIlAi'HlCS
I~U'","'.Jl"","II...rn"..Qk","~1"';
'."'1,."..,:",..n.UI'''~rl\'"i'''''>l','''''W
MI"\rJO_'.L'-:l"'I\'m...,...;Pu.v,..",,,
,"'r~,IL\." ,t)<.nlt.lbl'toED
....'.~m,-p,'Q'J1I11~l_'...""~'*.
.hr>r",~"".,.~_..n"
;...., "..,,,,..,,, ,,,,.,,,,, ",~"....,...,.<,o
"'. " '.. ..'........ ""..... '.~ ,"''''''
""""'C~~I ,'" ",.,...,.~.....".....,."...
....."'......."..."..,...,~-.,.,"'.."..
,..,_~,.,.." .s....,..,.,........,. ..,....,.0
TERRITORIAL PRISON
ORIGINAl.. PROPERTY
LINE (TVP) (PR ,t5j
SEGMENTAL CONCRETE
, - - RETAINING WAll UNITS CPA '5\
ST CROlX LIMESTONE WAll CPR '5}
TERRITORIAL PRISON
-,..-- ORIGINAl PROPERTY
J CORNER (TVP) CPR '5J
ST CROJX LIMESTONE WALL (PR '5)
r\
~~
Rr\'l5l(1'\j5~
ADDE:'IiDU:\11 .
QWEST COMMUNICATION
JUNCTION BOX (PA '5)
8'x8' CONC.PAD (pA '5)
REPAIR END OF HISTORIC PRlSON
STONE WALL & liMESTONE
WALL (TYP.) (PR '5)
LANDSCAPE EDGING
PLAT CORNER (TVP)
STORM CATCH BASIN
PLAT UNE (TVP)
CITY STANDARD CURB
& GUTTER (T'l'fI.)
~~z
~~ .~
~~~
~~~
~7JJ.E--
~<<
~2~
~ ~ :::
~~E--
,.......,~rJ),
~<
.
oS" VERTICAl CURB AlONG
THiS SIDE OF ROAD iNl Y
.
/
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUHI
SWEEl'iEY
NEW CITY SIDEWAlK TO
MATCH OOWNTQIMl
SPECIFlCATlONS{TYP.)
BUILDING 5
/'
SITE PLAN
ACCESSIBLE
CURB (TYP.)
SCHEMATIC
DES1G:'oI
DATE:
PROJECT NR:
DESIG~ED:
DRA"'S
08.31.04
01026.50
JHB
RS,KS
,
L5.11
.
PHASING LIMITS ---------------
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -------------
NOTE: AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
o
I
10 20 40
.
.
.
8
~
.
.
.
.
,
..-
.-.--.
(
PHASING LIMITS ---------------
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -------------
NOTE: AREA OUTSIOE OF CONSTRUCTION UMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
-'-
Scale: l' = 20'-0'
DIMENSION PLAN
, '-----'
o 10 20
I
40
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECTURE, L TO
')I~I:->ORTH T1I1RD STREET
fo,fJ:l,-SEAlOtlS. MI~"SESOT,\ 5:401
rEL:c61:\JH..\7!.lf..\.'<'161:1.\_l!1"~MlI
...."'.;b...ull~.....
l"KR.\:.iPU.:-,-;o.;l:>-:O"
f)PEXSP.\CF. CO~I"'t "}:ITlf.S
AIlCIIlTEcn:ltE
L\~DSC,\I'F.\RCHITEcn'RE
GRAJ'IIICS
,~~....~,-':~.f1>'Y T~"r !Ill' ~""~
,I't',"U1<.,.l1""'n..U"IT....hflll','..UD
M\'Z€~~~f~~~~1~~.r~
..... ,.,~""..,"';..."....'''''rrn.~'"'
""".'" ""."..,.......'. ".,."".
..,_>.,.""..,.,,,, "',......,...,.......V'..~HI
..,.."...."......",..........".....,"''''',..
,.......,.,..,"'.....,....1<.."........"..
()
R"\'J~!Q"i%.
ADDE:"lDll:'\J I ~
~~z
~~:;
~~~
>~~
~~~
~~ ...:l
>~::3
........~E-<
,....., ~ rf1
~<
/
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUHI
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
/'
DIMENSION PLAN
SCHE~IATlC
DESIGN
DATE,
PROJECT NR:
OESIG~ED,
DRAW~
08.31.04 .
01026.50
JH8
RS,KS
L5.12
.
.
.
.. ~.----
-.
- -733
I
J.BUXELL
.\RCHITECTURE. L TO
...",O/(Tll rWkDSTRliET
-~~:";~:~~~~~~:;'~~}~:~1~~':1..
Quantity
L5.13
.
l'RBM':I'l.A~~I",,(j
ni'r:.:-.sp.\Cli Ct)~IMl~rilF.S
ARClllTF.CR'Ri:
L\",nsc,\,PE AilCIIITECTl'RE
GR.-\PlllCS
:J~'~,~~~~~~~!E
~1~~~~{.~~~~E~4i~~i~
CD
B.FTI,\'Q\'Si
.\DDE.'IDV.\( 1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1 ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
1
I
\
,
,
,
, .
,""
\........
, ....
, ....
,....
,......
, ........
, .
,
'\
'\
'\
'\
,
'\
, ,
'\ ,
.",
'\
'\
~
~~z
~~~
~P::ci
~~~
~rJ'J.E-<
~< <:
r~" p:: ~
~p::...:l
>~=
~E-<~
~~
DEVElOPER:
FRAUENSHUHf
SWEENEY
$}mbol
Description
212
Rain Bird 8H 1804
.
49
6S
Rain Bird IOH 1804
Rain Bird 12H 1804
.
SITE IRRlGATIO);
PLA);
.
ps
il'
S9
S7
Rain Bird ISH 1804
Rain Binll5SST 1804
o
II
Rain Bird JS04.PC-I.S
Rain Bird SOO4.PC-2.0
Rain Bird SOO4-FC-4.0
Rain Bird IOO-DV
Rain Bird ISO.PGA Globe
Rain Bird ESP-24LX
Pump Station I
Clan-160-1.IIZ" -
Clll$.ll602"
Poly 100 1-
Poly 100 1 114"
Q
SCHDIATIC
DESIG);
...
11
.
S
S
Ell.
N,'A
-f
~
~
DATE
PROJECT ~R:
DE.SIG~ED,
DRAWS
08.31.04
01026.50
JH8
RS,KS
19
PHASING (.;;IMITS .---- ----
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ---- ~
SHADED AREAS ARE WITHIN BUILDING 5 CONTRACT ~
2128
!---t r----
SS77
16~9
(1)
SITE IRRIGATION PLAN
I
I
o
tHO
SCAl.!: 1"..30'.0-
Scale: 1" = 30'.0"
~
..
I
.
.
, -. c.'. 'C ~~.:~ ::.("Cl J.:-~
// _,~i'~::-\,ir:~-"'C)
/ \.. t'.: ..Iy"""'-___
-- t '",.)t(-.~~~CC~, . --
....'.j
_.\ r
'. ~ \
" /
/ ;'
////
//./
"'--...... P\~ (',.\ ~
~~~ .
sHr-\J\oc'
I F~ ,~\~\r
--- c::C!/..... ,.. \ ., '-< \ f--;
, .........r~-.\" "j \ .....-
''-- Ie" /.(Ce"\1'"
_ .-._.-.~, _\ i r-f- ." '.'t-)
... \, \ ',...- v~ '-
.
- Pi \, OAf-.S
--~
PLA:'iS ARE ILLUSTR.\ TIVE
A:'iD ARE SUBJECT TO CHA:'iGE
J.BUXELL
IRCHITEcn.RE. L TO
4"'" ~TiI TI'I~~,,,'~Hr
":,,..., q~" ,,, \11''-I-.("r\ ....,.
:.':""'1,\..;.",';0""1
111.;\\";".\''''';"
j>",I".I'i'\l\!1'I!IF...
,~ 11lT~('n Ill'
,,'1 .V" 'II r~.< TlltF
,,1IIrl'W"
----'
I
IS 24
S~ l:': 1::6 -:
/.NT N" "'""
./ _.-1-J
\- t
, /
''-..... ..//
Cfl
U
Z
~
~
~
00
~
~
~
~
z
~
ci
C;:;J
,
-
<:
~
..J
..J
-
...
?n
UE\ElOPER;
TERRITORIAL
SPRI:\GS. LLC.
,~ :...
"
D:\ TE. 0110.04
PROJECT ....R (HOZa.S8
DESIG:-;ED
OK.\\\".\; RJS
____1_? \ t
.
I '
.
~
.
.
MNDOT R8-3a "NO PARKING' SlGN
WI MNOOT R8.3aP "BET'NEEN SIGN"
PLACARD (TYP.)
.
.
.
-.
I
0_.-
"-
PHASING LIMITS ---------------
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -------------
NOTE: AREA OUTSIOE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
(2)
AMENITY PLAN
Scale: 1" = 20'-0"
~
o 10 20
= =
.~" ~... ,-Z- ~N" r
mn 3,",7 - ~ rr ~. ('Z" _~3"'"
B A ,.~
s
,I' ..;. .. oIL:;:: ~-~ ,. ~ V
~ TREX LAMINATED PANEl.
~ ' c -IN TAN
, ,
.~- .~
ACCESSIBLE SPEED UMlT. STOP DROP OFF ONLY YIELD
PARKING ONE.WAY.
DO NOT ENTER
NOTE:
TREX SIGNS MAY BE ONE- OR TY.O-SIOED
ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE TO HAVE WHITE LEGEI'I) & BORDER ONA BLUE BACKGROUND;
AND TO BE LOCATED NO MOAE tl-IAN 96" FROM HEAD OF SPACE
0)
STREET SIGNAGE
Scale: 1/4" = 1'.0"
NOTE:
INTERPRETIVE TRAIL, MARKERS & BENCHES ARE NOT IN CONTRACT
I '1Il_'.
___'.111 I'
1
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE, L TD
?lJlI)o;C)RTltnt:JtOStitfif.T
Mr,.,.~EAMllS.I>Q:-'"XF.SQT.-\ ~""Il
tELI61 ~ 1.l)1l-.17~.1 FAX ,461 :\.1,'1101)1"".
....Vlihollldl,"""'
(;ItB,~S 'UJo;':II1SQ
0'10:1051" ACE COM"'\' ~;nES
AItCUITEcn.:R.E
USDSCAPIi AJtCIllTECT1."Ilf
(iIl.APIIICS
l"'U..\'<:U~'TIIUTIfl;D"""'''i
_'.VII:..nl)O;lJ.IlUI'J.T "'~lnEI'UUl
'Y~~~a~:~:~=S~:N
.-< ..~-.....,"'...'........"",,..,.-...,'"
"'..."" _..'''n....... ,. ,"v"".
........'T.&"" "..'..".,....llU.......".
....."'~"'.& "'....,'.. ""'~"""''''"'''.
..._..........'...0.............., .....,..
CD
RF.VISI.!l""S.:
"DDE:"iDU~1 I .
~~z
~ ~ :;;
~.~ ~.
~.~ ~
.". r:fJ ~
~< <:
~~ ~
~ ~ :3
.". ~ ~
~ E-- E-<
,........, E-- 00
~<
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUHI
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
AMENITY PLAN
SCHDIATIC
DES1G:-1
DATE:
PROJECT SR,
DESIGSED,
DRAWS
08.31.04
01026.50
JHS
RS,KS
L5.16
.
.
~
.
.
.
RECCNSTAucrED c."'" SIOEWAi..i<'
AS PER CiTy STA~D"=:S AND
SPECIFI(A. TION
.
.
CONCRETE PAVER PL~z...\ :N COSS
SERIES PATTERN
SOlDIER COURSE, HOLU..'i:
SERIES BRICK PAVERS ,-",:::
CONCRETE PERMEABLE PAVE'"- ;::;.' AD
.
I
B
...
(
PHASING LIMITS ---------------
CONSTRUCTION LIMITS -------------
NOTE: AREA OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA NOT IN CONTRACT
0- :~~11~::~N ~
~ 0 10 20 40
SIDEWALK
-6" VERTiCAl. CURB, SEe CIVIL
CLAY SPleK PARKING STRIPPING
_ALTERNA1'EO WITH COBBLESTONE
STREET P.\VERS
COBBLESTONE STREET
CONe v:r:LLEV GUTTER
'\-. I I I , I I I I I ..
~/^'Y//^Y//~//~//~ /
-----.:..------
,.
~ .
."'1,
II.Fr'
SEE DIt,.'\ENS10NlNG PLAN
o
PARALLEL PARKING BANDING
Scale' 112" = "-0"
CLAY PAVEFl6'\NOING W,3,l;!
~ MORTAR JOINTS
112" MORTAR SETTING SED
1 ~. 4- "'---~. CONCRETE BASE. RE1~FO.ACE
~Io.---- ASREOUIREO
. ~. -...! .. jI"/k~f--AGGREGATE SUBBASE
~M",t-PREPARED SUBGRADE
o
BRICK PAVER ON CONC. BASE
Scale' 1/2" = "-0"
/ KEY:
A - CONCRETE COBBLE PAVERS LAID IN A COBBLE
SERIES PATTERN (INTERPRETIVE TRAIL)
B - CONCRETE PERMEABLE PAVERS (ROAD)
C - NET PAVE 50 (ANGLED PARKING STALLS)
D - CONCRETE INTERLOCKING PAVERS IN HOLLAND
. .
SERIES (SIDEWALKS, CROSSWALKS, DROPOFF ZONES)
E - CONCRETE W/5" GROOVES/SCORING PER DETAIL
4/A6.10
F - CONCRETE COBBLE PAVERS LAID IN COBBLE SERIES
PATTERN-CONTRASTING COLOR TO INTERPRETIVE
TRAIL
G -ADA COMPLIANT DETECTABLE PAVERS. CONSULT
ARCH.
/'
NOTE: VERIFY BRICK COLOR FOR ALL AREAS WITH
ARCHITECT
NOTE: SLOPE OF SIDEWALKS AND INTERPRETIVE TRAIL
CANNOT EXCEED 5%
NOTE: INTERPRETIVE TRAIL NOT IN CONTRACT.
FOR REFERENCE ONLY
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE. L TO
"'.','\t\ll.r1ITlI:Rp-;r.u:n
\1I~"I:.:,;'.'l!S_ \1l\;"'I:.S(,T.\~'~ll
I'E. ,,;): t,::~.;71, ~.\X <';1 :,n~.i,_w.'
"".. Jhu~.I1."",
l'Ra,l,.'~Pl.A:-'''':X~''
r,rl'\:sPM1,('(;.\tl.n.....1TrF.:>
Mlr:lliT!r:"Tl.1tE
L.\"t:$.7..\l-'li.U.:.::HI'n.C11:11J:
<JR.-\I'HI\'~
IH!JIJiII\,_"-~;'WlnUTn;I!oL"""''''!<o<J
~~~lf.~~7t~~5~f
~T\:t';f 'll.....E"'.'T.
r'\
~~
RFVI'IJl'i<;;':
AODENDU~11 ~
~~z
~~:;
~~ci
>~~
~<<
r.....1 ~ ~
~~.....J
>~:3
.........~E-
~E-OO
~<
DEVELOPER:
FRAUE:'<SHUW
SWEENEY
Bl'lLDlNG 5
PAVING PLAN
SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
D.\TE
JlROJECr KR'
DES!<iSF.I):
OR.\WS
08.31.04
01028.50
JH8
R$,KS
L5.17
.
'-
.
r'
..
~
F.;N1SfoED . .1"
GRAOe 1 .
,ICYP' 111= II~~~'.
'-:j I i ::::1.umt :
~
0:
~
a:
o
w
w
"'
'"
!!!
~
-y.
. j..=
2.!" ;:lIQ10 lNSUl.ATlON~
. "'vil'E'~ GYP. BOARD ---.
~ I:'CVJ\OATlON WALl. - _
;:l .s. EXTERrOR JOINT -
CHANICAL AIR _
~~~~ LOUVER
. r.,.:lE 'Y: GV':ao~e~RD ---i
1~5g ~JX
EXTERIOR ..JOtNt' ~
~:;ATEO SHEA~~ _
TO RU 1~UL..A
""/ GARAGESLAB l
f
/
SIMILAR TO
38" +/- OI~""S-?A~~ThEADS ON SLOG
i~r:~~CIFICA nONS
STONE WI MACti1NE
1, ~~ll~~~N AU EXPOSE
'~C t-SIOeStTYP,)
. ~ FINISHED GRAllE ,TVPI
'.1 r-
Id!1
I'
11:=i U
METAL BAND
~ x 3m" ANG.~ MANHOLE
FASTENED ~D ~.a. orAM CO
TO STAND"
~ANUFACTURED .
~C'AM STNA~~R(Cfvp,)
CONe. MA.
1
2%
STRUCTURAL FO~ ~~..e;"'Ge DOOR HEAQ
~~;D '" EL 71'.2-ALlG C DOOR HEAD
l 71. .AUGN W.GARAG_
HEAD @ e
AKE LOUVER
106 l( 64 INT
12" eMU FOUNQATiON
WALL (TyP.,
II.C jTYPj
6" POURED IN PLACE co
S" CONe. GARAGE
rSLAB'TVP.,
" LANS FOR P
EE STRUCTURAL ~TION F'L.ANS (TV .1
~OOTlNG & FOUND
ReTAINING WALL CAPSALL
DRY LAiD STONE ONE ReTAJNI~~L,l.YeRS OR
- DAY LAID STOF TOP EXPO~K AS NEEDED
I /i~~JKB~~~~ :1:~:H:f-/ SA
- GRADE
I
. ," / ... ">.
'. >---i11~."Fi"t-:1'1'7'
III" '1'--'
, r=iIIR'
.{&h. 'i,~,({~:~~~~.::_
.:>\- ~""':'''-CONNec ENTFlANCE
,~. . IN DRIVE STOf\oEMULCH
~~.grt6g~AIN TILE
SEe STRUC~u"~~~IO~ ;~N$ITYP.1 ~
FOOTING &
o
SECTION @ AIR
Scale' 112" = 1'-0"
INTAKE LOUVER
-e-
~T-f
1m
CAST CONCFlEiE CAP
. REBAR
J BUXELL
AR~HITE(,TU~~;,TO
i~~'S:~~~f1~t>;'>{,::~~,
. ..:~~~;..~~~~
r,PE""r_ _ _ .~R~:~~:rt:i
L."::"$.:..\H,\R_ (;11....Pti!':S
:~~~~~t~~~~;~:~
ETENTION SWALE
BIOMAT R TREAM BED
DRYS ING WALL
RETAIN,
a" STEEEDL ~~~~E~
POUR
-EXISTlOO STONE WALL
I!I' ~3'.0'" ClAM. cePE DRILL
/"
REVI<IO',S~I;M I _
AOOE.
ONE WALL
T FOR EXISTING ST
STRUCTURALSUPPOR
WALL SUPPORT
o
NIC
Not to Scale
~~ ~
~'C2 .~
~ ~ ==
>00 ~
~< <
r~' ~ ~
~~..J
>~ ~
~~
DEVELOPER:
FR\UENSHUW
SWEENEY
BllLDlNG5
SITE DETAILS
SCHEMATIC
DESIGN
~R'JiF.cr ,'R
DE$IG,"Fn.
OR.\WX
08.31.114
01026.50
JH8
RS.KS
-[5~T9-
.
-,
~
~
'r
l
I I
, .
~! ~
I
- - - - -"l:...,.._..."_.::-:-.~:;:'_.,,....o:,::,::;..~;~~~~j,..!.....j_.. \_...i!:._u
1; - I ;-
I:
~
I
. '-"[;';'-""4"''''''''''''''+';'0.'' .' r- i ;~
I ;: i 6 6: : . ..51V): ~"",l~' c
-~~-~-I---- ---~:_----------~---~--;-+---- ----:-+--' L--J-\l-4 ' ~".. ~ ~I' '.
I I. I I I I I !
1 'I ' 1 I I I
I I. I I I I I : 1
~ i i i : O~R'aEAREA20.'~SF :: : i -i'i~ B~g~~~~~~':
, 1.1 ' "" ~
i - -- -- - --- - --- --!~i-- ---- -- -- -- -.~------- ----- -- ~---:-- -- - - -~---~~- - --- ---- - - -' ~- t--- - --------- -- ---- -~, -l- ---- --1,---- ---
; I I. I I I' I ,
- - - i ---, - ----:~ --, -, -----, - - -~ : --c '--t - - --,=,-,--,- -- j,--_!, rr -, - - ,- - -, -~ -, -,-- -+ -- ---, - -, -- ---- ~ -- f -, - - i---- ,-
i ! i ! . '.":H ~ Ii' i ~i"" e~g~~~T,~~~4 i i
I ~ 1 t........t- RECYCLING:::S I I I
, =j 'I .... .-.\ ~.~ I I'.,'d: I - 1
. : ' I'I,~' " ' ,
. .. .........:'. .. ~. .... '. .'" . = - ! [YJI II I I' I
_ "II IIIV' _ _ I. _ 1 . E__. E".!IP ; I , ,. I I
--:"~.-~I;:u.:t!'--- \ ~-+t--------------~'.-l'--- ---- --~I---9tJ~--- :~._,._^-- --~-'-_. -- n n.__ -'~~------------1----------: ~ '=--it ---~------- ~
---j'-!.. n '111111'111' -' --- ------------;:i-------- r~-.., ~ --- ,.; -----------!--- ----------f:------------ -:' -~--------------------:----c-----!~--'--
. :"~.":'-"""" . ~ jl i . 1 TRASH I 1 I I: I 1 I~
~ --- +: i i 1 i L ~I' '., e~g~~~~~;~~' i i
~ I. 1 " r.' , " "
_____ ~ ~___ -----------11 ! -lJ?!- ..,1 I ll_____________:___________L~:__________________L______ _____i_______
~ Y I .--- . I &-1 I, I I I
- ---- ~----- ------t--- ------------,-j-+------ -- :.1.____. -- --- j---- -i- --1- - --- ---- --t-t"- ---- - --- -----Q-. ~ i--- -- ------ -------- -t- - - - - -- ~-- --i---- -.-
"; I, I ': 1 I I I I; I
, 1 . I ' '---'"l r--I; I I I I I
, I. I ,I ' , ,
: tT! : ! ~
I 'I' I II I ~
~ UI iLOBBY;; J: i ~
'Ii ! ;! I .!~ . Y MALRM :! ! ! ,~ ~
~ I 'I'. /\J( ~ I I I I (
-L_ --~ ~- - - -" -- - --- - - - ~ ! .,,- - --tt - J~_=_ ~ _=_ ~ -=-~ct. ; ~!-- ----- - - - - --- i.. - - -- - - - - --;~ . - - - .s---
- j- -:- .:. -:-. t ^~,' ~ - ~ i 7' ~.:. -:- c. ~, ,-:-.:. -:- .:. c .:. --: .:. -:- , t' -- . '-, -. . =J!!I.:. -:- .:Ii::: -,~~.:. -:- ~ .. ,:: . -. i' -:: .:. -:- .:. -:- .:. -:- .:. -:- iF':' -:- .:. --: ~: .:. -:- .:. -:- .:. c~ - - :-:::'- =-:=--: ~ --: c. --: .:. -:- .:. --: c. -:- .:. --: .:. -:- .:. -:- .:{:- .:. -:- .:. --: c. -:- .:. -:- -, -:- .:. -:- i:. : :::
~ ME~' !:: ! : : r--n---n-----l
Y..::;;.:..:.F= .=..l~~iT''--''-- .__u.__u,j . ! I ;J........ ." ..._,,=1.. i j :;._.-1_,-.... '
I -I' I I' -.. - - - - - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i - - - _._-- ...._~,rJ~ U1 nllllllillllr~.llllllllllllllllllmllaillllllllilllllljla\JIIII\lijl~ I I --
I I I I ' . I
1 ,-,-, 1-- --I--l-~""-"'';t~ . ." I nl"""'""'~- ~..:z--I--
i ~ i ~ i i i . :~::::::::::::::::::::'~ i
i i i i i i i i i i
~:::~.~
ME':;H
~~
----- ;~
~1
~
..0
l~
~
BROWNSTONE '2
LO'NEA LEVEL
BROWNSTONE .-t
LOINER LEV'a.
--.--
~-------.t-
~
.
I
~
J
~
~
r:\ GARAGE FLOOR PLAN- 26,126 GSF
\... 1 ) Scale: 118" = 1'.0"
J.BUXELL
ARCHITEcnJRE, L TD
9CJNCllTH~SnuT
:.m.'mAY'...us,'.MlNNES..."'1'A S14i:ll
r!L(S1:}n"l11) FAX:(SI:)11I.0040
___.~olL=-
"'"^""-"""""
CP!!NS1"ACECC~
A1t.CHIr;.....'"tT1JJl
'-'NOSCoU'1;~
~
I_JIIy~nc.o.l'na:llU._
-J ~~~~
. /'/ARK RYAN
17418
_. _.._n'...-...._....
.....-..-.......-..,..-
...,.....,_......__....v..._
_.._..-.........~.._-
n-....... _ __r ,._
REVISIONS:
~C3
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
;> ~ ~
~ ~ ~
;> ~ ~
; ~ 00
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUH
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
GARAGE PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE'
PRomer NR,
DESIGNED,
DRAWN
083104
01016.50
1118,11)8
HJ8
A1.10
..
.
.
--e-
0J
~
~~\:l~'-';" '.'"".~ " " - -
--,....~._.-_._-..
.....,....!~,;,...
....::..;:~;..,. .....",_ .:..r:.~~';':;u.
.;
~
~
~
u
t_____~
I
I
o
o
,
,
or1
'1...J
I
I
I
I
I
I
_ r-----J
.~
(\
<r
J
OAR~OE AREA 9.554 SF
(')
~
:.'-~. ..._:':::..~....._, ~ _..;.~-- ..._.....~.;..:':;-. .-~.__.,_.
11
"/11 ~.-..... ..J....,....u... ...,...1..,. ......'. ........,J...,.....,. .,...,...,......";,,...;........ L......"......".,..,'.,.,..'"''.,...''' ,.J..,......,..".....,,: I,.".,..... .'.,I;,n ""';.. ..,......,. "."""'"
~-
~
G
t_lt~IT #100
IJNITitlC:2
~.... :
. ,
. ,
"". .
-,
~;
IJOt.
~
FIRST FLOOR PLAN- 23.174 GSF
Scale: liS" = 1'-0'
r
i/~
; /
~
r-
;t
-l j'J.
~
1
C)
... .J~
'.,....~
J
J\n
1
~
..;:~....... .........~.......a'. .,:~. .......t ....:.::..._~..~ ............ '0, ," ,.... ., " ..... .... .;.
~~
--v
~
'"
~
UNIT'101
@
~,
~-~
J
till J~IIIII
r.,.f,=.t,,," ':"::=; -: W
~
~
WJL
e
I)l'i!~ .~;;o
(;)
~ r:-,
~JllliJ!tl" ~
BROWNSTONE ''5
IJPPEA LE\'El
BROWNSTONE liS
'M'PPEi=l LE\lEL
BROWNSTONE #4
1~'PpeR LEVEL
eRCWNSTONE '"3
I_'PPEFI LE\/EL
BROwNSTONE *2
UPPER LE\Ie.
BROWNSTONE .,
\JPPER LE\fEL
c;
?
,~)
.'_C'l
J
-L
.~:.~_.t
~-':i
"
~:. ",
=,,~
(. .. -i ~
~'.
"l~
_:~
". : ~
: ~
j ~
"
~ '
["':"
!: i
T'~
~ I
~lb,
~
~
~~""~:':'")
4>
~
G
~
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECIL"RE. L TD
9V~NCRrHno.r:S~:
~S.M.."lN!SOl'A!~1
m.:(512)11..rmlAX:(5r:.)m.~
www:N.I:~u.::a.
u1l3A.'f?"'..A.~~':l
OPEl'o-SPAC! :::CM:-fl~
AA3n::::-.~
lA.>.tt:S~AJtC:H:":!...-:-~u
G!lA..'>H::S
1_IIIY~':\<.o.rrH:I:llU.~
~.o.n_<lIt1l>>Ol<1"'.o.$_'-
n...<lIt'.'M>U._~J'w~
_"",,,TI.AloI.o.I>O.&.Y~
.uU;:HI':~I._n&~'a'1at,.
ST.o.rsat-.so:-...
HAliK IIYA.N
77.28
-. '~"_.~"--"-----.'"
... n _ .._..~ .._ ~ ....-..
--.~........_.._~...-
.-..-.............."""".....-
...............~--_....-
REVISIONS:
~ ~ Z
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ci
> if1 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~....J
~ ~ ~
~~
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHl}}{
SWEENEY
BUlLDIl'!G5
FIRST LEVEL PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE; 0831"
PROJEcr NR: 07026.50
DESIGNED; .JJiB/lJB
DRAWN /'UB
A 1.11
.
.
.
---
@
.~.
.~
~
I_NiT_2C>4
...~
III"; I
""--}&II:~
t
L
{~
~
UNITil203
f
i
I
l
if\..-
Ll
~
..1
.... ........
."'l.. .....
m
0):~:~~~_:.LOOR PLAN- 19,984 GS~
..en
'-f
IJNlTil2C2
.. oJ.;
I)NlT.2-:~
\j
:
U
STORAGE
STORAGE
-f\
~
... - ,-".,-,-. .....
r:a n',' "'.. ...._......~..
.uu...i
fl
r1J\--
~
...?
~:....,;..............................................................
~; ~
- .'
LJ
~
ST~F1t.OE
;,.;;;;;;;a
m
......
1.JNITil201
UNlT'2C.s
STORAGe
r1
STORAGE
u
I .
_ , I L.
i=
~jlS
c.
u
'"
-?
S,QAA.3E SfOFlAoJe
~
"
'"
1_'NiT '200
f9v, ..'
~L~
~
$I
~
l_>NIT .207
UNIT .208
]-
~
............-.
v
!-"
~
I
~.~
I!t
:'L
~
'~.
~:' ~
~; , .. ~
~ .. d'
"
::~~~ .
:'. '..,......
... .
, ~.'~
r ~
I: :
:L
i~,
\1).
Iii
J.BUXELL
ARCHITEcnTRE, LID
~~~~;~l
~.:S:":)11'.lTI1J1AX:{612)lU.~
_.pa.I!.UI.
1JIlBANP1.A.~
=-~?A.3CCMMl.-:""~
.u..aun:n.-n:
:.A...."DS=.A.Y.EAJ.~C':"JRE
00..=
~~=::'u~~
WIo:5=-"__CKna1l.~
_:K<.r:.u("'DU.T~
~-~";r';'io,;-~;;:'I:W~
. HARK RYAN.
SD<4:'....",
~3
'7428.
-. -_.~.._..._.....
- . - ..-... .- .. ,..-.
-.....-----..-
-..-..-.........-.....-
,,--.--...-
REVISIONS:
~~
~ S ~
;, ~ ~
~ ~ ~
""", ~ =
~ E-- Eo--
~ ~ rn
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUH
SWEENEY
BUILDh"G5
SECOND LEVEL PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
- -
DATE, D8.JL04
PROlECf NR, 0'026.50
DESIGNED: .Hf8J1J8
DRAWl! IfJ8 ,-'
_ A1.12
.
.
.
~
.
:' ~...~..,
=- :i..--....u~
,~
~
lilT I
I . I J
:,~III ~
.~
'~'
1..'NITt3C3
r.........
~
.. .
.1 .
(1) :~~~:l:~OR PLAN- 19,984 GSF
~-.......
~
f,
~
~
I)NIT.3O:i!
,.INIT.J\:5
.~......-
-1
v
~
..~.
1)
STOFl':'J~
STCRAGE
f\
;r
w
oli' II
J11~
'.'!'JT~ '3::''5
(\
LF
57;=:"3<::
STOP;':'3E
. r - ro;;;;a~'
t' - i.: j
I
-"-
,.'6.
~....-'
, .
"" .
~
l.
?
:m;;;;;a
,.,.:r_3Cl
~
c.
STORAGE
r1
u
u
S7:;:':'~E
STOFlA3E
.?
-f\
'_'NITUOO
--
I)NIT_3C7
'3~iT #3:::]
Q
. ,
IJ
F
:"
::
.-------' '. ..;
s:
"""'"
...........1...
I~I' .-1''''-
____ n,.
J.BUXELL
ARCHlTICTURE. LTD
9oJ.;JIfCll:1lno.o s1'JtE4r
~.MJNQSOTAH""l
;a:{5l1)UI.tr11 'AX(5u)nl-004o)
...-,)tlucol1.ccm.
t.UAN~O
CP!l'IS?AC!COMMmm'IU
AACHmCTUU
t.\.NDSCA.."!:All~_c:run
0IW'lIlt:$
1_"l'~nIA'I'na-._
~lWIfOllJSl'OllT.....a_AllID
"''''OIl~_M'I':xII&Cl'1\Jl''iUt\'fS1ClM
.oIOD1K<l'l'r.......:;II.E.l'lIa.n~..
~t,ltQU.ftG,u.....~__
sr"'$OI_'"
HARK RYAf:I
17428
:.. ..,"=,'":~:'~~::"-:"i~
::::=:.-:;-.:':.-==~..:.=
.._~ -,--~"-
REVISIONS:
~~
~.~
~~
~~
>~
~~
~~
z
~
~
ril
f-;
-<
~
...:l
...:l
-
f-;
rn
_r;-...
~
DEVELOPER:
FRUJENSHUH
S'VEENEY
BUILDmGS
THIRD LEVEL PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE: 08.310'
PROJECI' NR: 01026.50
DESIGNED: .JH8/1lB
. DRAWN tuB
A 1.13
.
-
.
.
.-~--
11
C:III'';lr
.. :r---
o
7
I
r'
~
~
w
UNlTiI402
if'
....
____.~_._.J@J
0) :~eUl~:=~,_:LOOR PLAN- 15,944 GROSS UNIT SF
~v
'JNlT_4C<)
STC..,E (b
fYb .
1"1
m.
i
'-=---
1M
v
!i
\""__'1__':.."-'---' -,.,,--,--, _~
~ ~
IJNIT~':
1)
STCP:':JE
a
ro
u
~
---,
STORAGe
UNIT '1401
'= '
W1
L/
STO.ACE ~
w
.0
~
~
':tlli-':'::
.I.~_~.r'
~
1iL-_
'JrUT.':.::.
J
=
_--.Jm
~
;
~j
~ -
"
j
~
,~
~
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECTIJRE, L TO
9l:JNCJ.rnnmwSt'lUT
~,M!NNESOTA'S401
:!L:{SJZ)nl-J111FAX;(Stz)11"0G40
www.JtoadLco.
lJ>8ANru.>ollNG
Cl'ENSPACE CCMMUNITtES
~
t.AmlSCAJ'! AllCJUre.Ct"tIlLE
C2Al'HlCS
1__TClllmrTlKArnaoou._
~notfOll.~"4S_"'"
f1Y.._t._wrDlll:KT~
~~~==:
rr...5Of-"....
. HARK RYAN .
17428
__ _.._...-.._...ft
....,._._..u_...._
--.....-----
-..-.....,...---...--
...-...---.-
REVISIONS:
~ r5 z
~ Z ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ 00. ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
> ~::
......... ~ E-t
~~rn.
~<
DEVELOPER:
FR4.UEN'SHUH
SWEE.L'ffiY
BUILDINGS
FOUR TH LEVEL PLAN
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE:
PROIECf NR:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN
083104
0102~SO
JHBI1J8
HJB..,
A 1.14
.
- ------
.
lBUXELL
ARCHITECTURE, LID
9l::~NC1tmno:::.i~r
MI2'lKEA.."CUS.~...s:;:'A~,..,t
1"Et.;(S1:Jm.r171pAX:;st:;!!I.OO4O
-...~;::).
t1lUIA-'{!'"..A.~
C1'~PACi::C~r..'Mr.I!S
Ail.:x:'E::rt."R!
~"!A.Il~:::tflJ!,
"'""""'"
t_.,.~.", " ..na~_
snocn:..o.t'".-QOl.-r..,urllSPAJIrD
"'_Oll~_.....~s:..~,,*
AtC)lK.o.r;_"'~T~JD
d .JT....O'~:.,.-
HARK RYNi
17418
-. __.~/.--~-""'''~''
...... _ .._.u...- ... ,-..-.
_..".._,....~............-
-..- "-'.' -...........-
..-----....-
REVISIONS:
F':Fln.j;;;.:':'=
t ~:~a
.~c ~
C-
_ _ y..WIW#1:i11i1:1:i1:fjWW.MIIM1WNiM~.~www.V.\-..WJN~.:1..t.WWvVvWMWHVWNWNV.M....Vv.WWvW:ir^W.t...WNNNNNJW.IWoJJJIMWNIWWY.IVW.vWvWIWvVW.lWVWW~NY.NNYMWMNN...Y./NNvV.IVNN.......IvVNNtNvV/N.MNlWvVvVvVvWM.i.N.f
~ 00.
e" Z;
~ Z ~
-
~ ~ ~
~ ~
00. ~
Eo-<
-< ~
~ ~ ~ ~
..,J
;, ~ ..,J
Eo- -
n Eo-<
~ Eo- rJJ.
~ -<
~1lI1lmR1
:-~5S ':'- 4~>(etJIl.T.'.'P FiO:)F. TV?
.
~ :::::f,;;' -~------r , - I -[ -,,"~ ,-
- 1_U'_"'M~_~"'i_-"""""''''~'''''''''Y'''''''"''Iff1JNII~-'--'''-
~ 11 J-I - -1- THI.DFLOC. lJ- J
TH"OFLOO. . I
f '2N'iiF"E--.------- _ 'HO'J. I
\J("'Il~JW/MWIVWWWVY" fi.^Jo/~rf:.J.:' I "V\'N';wVY'Nw;'NIWNAN\tI#N~.iiif!v.JiM""\fWl'J'M:......,'tf'M ~ ~"HIvIJ.~" WvWvw# - 'NvWWlWlvfrt..~"..,~
I ~
~ I
~;~f:E.'C. --'.- - - - - - -1 ."~",.,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,<,,,,,,~,,:-;-,~,.,,>,,,,.,,,,,,",,, ".......
I
i.
"
,:,~''" ~. - - - - -j'- ,,-~T_"LT.
i '''''<rm r---' --,~ ---------- -----~.:=:A:G~----
~~- :~
I. E ' ~. A....m...................--- .., _.._n
_.--~ B ST::...s: ~.. . -...0. ~.;; - - -=- - - - - - - - - - - .-.-
, L:'~~~~ _.J -----: - - - - - - - - - - -
PEFl"'ETS=l 3PACE BEAU. TYP, ~ '
"8'IUETEi>::'''''' TU'. TV. --Y :
. .:::~::~.: ~..::
':;~~ ~:::::.:.~:.,:':'.~..;-~:~~~.:'.:.:~~:
~ fr"M.~'~_O~ ~
.:;:':,;:::::::.::' '::.....:, ..mM.} .-.~,... .J.....!..... .1..... J "....... J
..OWNSTONE / .'j' '" ..=
~~L~!
'.~.....:_' .__.;: ,_. _~.;_. _.__;_._, _. '.~_;_._ .-.".;_:"._ _;_.... .' .;... -.., ....- -.-. --F.- .~-. '~.'; -.... -~.': '.. -,t; ." ....-~ ,- ,-'
DEVELOPER:
LOBav
o
..........:.. ....,.,,: ":...,,~.... ~;:~:"...":,, .":....'J'"'-'- . 'To...:." ..,; ,;;-;.
....l~.....
.... ,,' .p..
FRAUENSHT.iH
SWEEi'lTY
]'=-1
'", ... .. . ........ .. .:- J. . - -.
! . ~. _. -=...:.... . :~.,. ".~ . ....~. ~~._. 0:."';'" ~.:~. O:;.~. "-:': :.' ~.
[I
seCONQ nOOR
,.
I
BUILDL'\'G 5
\.-:-.~..'.,.:-.
.,.{".~:.,
o
BUILDING SECTIONS
FFlST FlOOR
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
----------,~
--..:,-!:~
o .:'" :.; 0 CONe SLAB ON O~AOE
--~--
DATE:
PROIEcr NR:
DESIGNED,
DRAWN
08310'
07Ql~50
JlffJlfJ8
I1.JII
PARKING a:'FlAOE
BROWNSTCNE
LOlM::Fl LE\18..
_____~___Jl,.
a ~~ 0
o ~ 0
CD
LONGITUDINAL BUILDING SECTION
ADD-'
..
-
P\.ES, T1"P
Seale: 118" = 1'-0"
ll_'-'
..1 I
.____._____~__-~~;,'''''NN~~W''''"--,~,-~---------sr
~
lJffiilil. FO'. .T_ F~:C. I- '.
r , "C". ~
~~NIYWWi';,Wf!'N'N'MM"v'vWr.W{'tlw-t-rWfN{NNN~WNI'INN/MNtNtI 'U:I11:.It1ii.' "f/:NJN}^'oJ.J.NttNtIIWM~V"vWW"" {'",.~ ,
.
.
F.:,.;!=m-i FLOOR
_* ~~~a
FO'JRTH FLOCFl
+:3:~~;~Cl< -~.-------
-+- ~;:~:._~"iR - ~ r-" _... - w
_j ~J~:~\i~nnR ~ ~ _ _ _ - - ..
....A..... FiF'ST FlO.O..
T l~''''FFt:
-+- ~~~~Y"FI; - --
--l ---
o
THIFlDFLCCFI ~
r 1 HC". . m Illli !
j UliW-"\fWIINMIf:/iii;ot.. NvWI/vWNINWNWvI~wtl,vNIWVvVwtNtNtNlpi"l'vWW'lNNWtN. tJi:i:11J11:fI.l NlNlvWi.NIWVW.lWt.....{.NMINNNtlVNtNIVVwNNNWWW./WW.NNWMWVWWtJJ:;tij.! I .
SECOND FLOOR
.lD
if t-:,.~":"':.:...,~:-.:,,.:..~ ..,.,~~:-,
l'
;f
i
\1
l.'
~
1..................-.............
I
~
.
~f
3
*
3 HC'JA
........k.,.....,,;::;::,:::::..... ::';'.::"-"
~ :~: :::: ~: .. :.::~: :~::.~ '::',: '<fl'...:~:: ~::.r". ~,~. ~~'!. ~ ,_'" !n:' ,.. !~....: ~:.~~ ;:-: ~::'~:'~'''::.: ~.~ ~l~': :-,'
"
P~J=II'CtlQ QAFlAC ::
IJPPeFlI.EV1tl..
13 HOO;. :t
r":";'::"~'</ . ..
{...-;.....,;.;'.....;....'..
';-:"-'
,....;-;.-.-.--;-..,-.--;..-.-.-;;.-...-
...;..,....--.-.-..-;...-..-;.'. ..'-.
. -, .;,..~..~
p~ ::iI,"""NQ QAI=lAC :
.0 'oEFllEVEL
-r--
.. f! ~
Scale: l/S. = 1'-0.
TRANSVERSE BUILDING SECTION
1
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECTURE. L m
PCoJNCR.nlnmlDSntar
~,MlM'fESCrA'StlJI
=n.:(S11.)J3I.]171JtAX:(5U)111.0))t0
_Jtq.IcU._
1JlllW<"""""""
cnNSPAClCC~
AJt~-CtUU
l..Ro"DSCAPIA1lCHII!.::ntU
"""""'"
r__ra.lmft"_flM!l~_,
I ~_,._ .,.. :lIl1llPOltT...s__
IWaAOIl\'"1/DMJon'()tQ(:fSl:l'UlVll_
Al'DTN.o.fr_"'DU.r~m
~WCIUlnlar..o.'WS~_
IT"':l-~~""
. HAf/K RY,4!l
17'28
-- --..,-..-.....
....._.._r___..._
---......---...-
-~_.._..._-..--
..--..--....-
REVISIONS:
~~
.~ Z
~.~
~~
~~
>E-<
;~
:z
~
~
r.J
Eo-<
-<
~
...J
...J
-
Eo-<
rJ1
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUH
SWEENEY
t~
t
BUILDlt'W 5
k
BUILDING SECTIONS
~
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE:
PROJECT NR:
DFSIGNED:
DRAWN
08.JU'
01026.50
.JH8/'fJB .
/'U8
L ';~
1",: ..
A3J.L
.
ceMENT eo SM~I(E
SDING,04Tl-lFL r'fP ~ ::--7"""""T "' .
Pl=IECASrCCNC CAP TVF' \ ~- -<.~-~-_., --IS.;
~ J:.:l.;.r.I.~~/.f....,... (' .."..~. 'r ~ " UL_'_'
-I--
_.______ _J~J~tlmI.k--~III11!f::-m!!Jffl=-
l~t"ml~~;i,;i; ~"751f2VlU' I
--------- - ~1';IHII1[~f;~n;-~~frlf
SECOND FLoeR oJ
11S'4"FFE - \"---- ---
.
-.
FO'..IFlTM FL~~i=l
S ROCF CECK
~ 1J~'~FFc
T....lRn~1 c-.~R
1.27"-2"FF=:
F1='5T FLOOR
i' lC$'-5' FlOE.
r
I I.o&ev
)0 lCO'~ F F.E
;. :~~~E
1 SI=lowNSTONE
.. L.O,^EFl LE\IQ.
I i2"~FFE
I
.
0)
?
A.SF'HALT SHNOL!:S. TYF'
CEMENT Be SHAI\E
SICINa. is 4TH 101. TYF'
-l,rl
.2llIll., m
EIF$
: <,-::.
...,,-- '.::-:. "':"<'i:~iY~~~:;IU {
----I -
-J~
[.---- - -
-.1
,..--------
..........
STOt,e \/ENe~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STONE \lENEER
SOUTH ELEVATION
Scale: 118" = 1'-0"
1
J.BUXELL
ARCHlTEC1UtE, LID
9Car::arH no;:: s~r
~us.~;,s:::r"~S4ill
:EI.:(U2",a.mJl'AX:.:m.)11I-.>>4Q
_.~.u.:olI
1,,'33A."f?".....uIN:NO
OraG'A::!::C~'NmS
A1~-:::UU
~A1Z':!.::tJU
"'^""""
r__Taa'l"lPTTHAf'l'lCl::ollA_
#l_,_"u . al'OC'..u__
"'_'___:alId'lI.~
AICl'llCllftAXA."'~'T~1D
~1._ns:""'W1~_
n-A.m.~-=-A.
HARK RYNI .
11418
-. ..-_.~,._..._.....
......_,._..~-~,......
.....................,...--...-
, ..--~.....-
n_~ _ __~.._
REVISIONS:
~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ cl
~ ~ ~
~ 2 ~
> ~ ~
~ E-- rn
~<
DEVELOPER:
FR~UEi~'SHUH
SWEEl....LY
BUILDING 5
BUILDING [LEY A TION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE: 08..1104
PROJECT NR: 0101&.50
DESIGNED: .lH6J118 .
DRAWN Hl8
AS.10
----
.
.
~n.n
FO'JATH FLOOR
_, ~3:~:~EECI( -l;-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~..."
, ~~;~:L~~ ---J;-__________
-t ~;:~:~OOR -~ ~- - - - - - - - - -
-t ::~ ~~~R
""* ~~~VFFE
""* ~:~~_E
BROWNSTONE
...A LOv.€A..!::,EVEL
-1" S2".os'r.rE
8- :~~:.:~~VATION
CEMENT eD $HAl(E SICINQ S 4TH FI. T'(P
IllIIUIillIII
=l =r'
llllImlIIIJJllI mIl
:::j n =- ~,I
~~
~
I
i
-
l~
r- r=l
.1
r=1r
._1
IllIIllIIIIJIllillJ
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECWRE, LTD
9OCNORlH nmt.Il Snu:T
MINNEA1'CUS.~rAS~1
nL:(S12)n1.117) l"A."(:(Slzma.1>>lO
-)tIwc..u.~
0"""''''''''''"''
cn:NSl"A...'"'ECOMMlJNt1'l3S
"'oomcrtJ>E
tAN'DSCA:E'Euoumcrou
"'^"""
r_llIIy~nc..r1MSt>IV._
sn.an::.o.l'tOItOll._T'W.o.s__
"_OlI.\lM:'lI&MI'OlQCI'~1OIf
MOnu.rrAM...::ltLYJISaUVollD
u._._"~.",,"___lTl&t.o.'"Of'_
$T....:s0f'~....
HARK RYAN .
11428
-..-........,-...-.....
...........-...y..-..,........
-...................-,,,...-
..-..... - -",-...-
REVISIONS:
~~
es~
.. ""'- ~
~OO
~~
>~
~E-;
~~
z
~
~
~
Eo-;
-(
~
...:l
...:l
-
Eo-;
rFJ.
---..........
1\
~.
.I
o
E
o
8
o
8 8
DEVELOPER:
C;;;;1,.,,-
~. I!IIlfI ~
FR4.UENSHUH
SWEENEY
~ ~
~.__.._,-". ~~ ~
.::F:N: ~:': FLOOAS
BUILDlt'(G 5
BUILDING ELEVA TION
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE:
PROJECT NR:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN
011.31.84
01026.50
Jff8)'1JB
/'UfJ
AS.13
.
.
.
- I
If=~~
c;;:...?
-1 - -E
~I--'''i =-
*. ~'llb ,- ~
FOI.JRTH FLOOi='
~* ~3::~~~ ---J~__________
't--
c=::.
.A THIROR-OO," -' .'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m III 11111 III
....,. 127".z'F.F.E '~
"T11
.~.......... :1/ .
""~' IUlUI~
'~:~~F~OOA~.l._______~_____ I
C 1221:
, ,
,* ~c:: ~~~A
.t ~~~~VFF,E
-, ~:i~,E
BROWNSTONE
"" LO",,"ER LE\ia
_.~~~ ~<r FFe
8
.~!~~~
..----
-,
Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0"
EAST ELEVATION
., ~
-~.
j - =- Innll -I-l
~ - lliJllllIllllIlI~Ullllmlllllllllttiltfltlttllllll,
_/i~ tr ,~
o =- =- J - r-J.~J-I.- l (
= ~ llllllllJllIU .~
=-~lnl =l ---
- ---
---
=I~UI II =I --- ---
- - -
.....II~- -_..-
==--,
,..'''. .-
~~1
..., - -, r--nil - D-,r
-i- 1" . ...I..r ~ I - =='-'r
kflllt+flilllllllll i.imlh J ~
~1~IIII1DlJ
101IIQ~
, -
~~!~~
TIn1
. IllIilllllllllllllllll!mIllJ!.
~~~~
.~:~!~~~\
b-=l
r-'
I ~
{' - - - - - '1' L ,r'-
. I,
----_. -;~
t --- ~-~-
- -----------------~~
nH~!!
, ~
,~~
HllftUlttffl1 rtl1tt .
r- ,
':r~:)~
~~~
. T \
- -
._-~-'=-~._.-
J.BUXELL
ARCHITECTI.'RE, LID
~or-rcllram::1l.DS~!
~"!APOUS,MtNNUOrAS14ll1
n:.:(!12ms.mllAX(SI:}UI.0l>I(l
_,jtudLco.
."""'lWOllNO
~PAC1 CCMMllNrnES
..."""""'"
u.NDSCA2'! AllCHr:!CTtlU
ClOAPlIlCS
1__T~,""",'natlU.__
~r.wrOll.-T.U_
...a.s;Jll\IIIDUIMl"~____
AlGtKO.l'r.-..r:ALTD<l'r.SIt..
~"'_~LA~"_
'"....M_lOr....
. f1ARK RYAll
11428
-. ......._.~,._...--.....
-,,_.._~._-,-
-----.......---..qr-
.-..-..-.......-..---
,,_........_-~..-
REVISIONS:
CEMENT eo SHAAE SIDINQ @ 4TH FL TVP
~ ~ Z
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ci
> 00 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ =
~E-&;
~~
EIFS 3 lST.3F;O FLOOFlA
BFlICKVENEEFl @ STAIR TOWERS. TV?
DEVELOPER:
FRAUE1"fSHUH
SWEENEY
BUILDL.'\G 5
BUILDING ELEVATION
STONE VENEER
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE: 08.J104
PROJECf NR: 01/)2~0
DESIGNED: .JH8/f.18
DRAWN 11.18
AS.11
.
.
~.
FC'JFlTH Fl.OOR
'f ~3:~~~~~CK
~ ;;~~ ~~~R
~
fiiD-
Illfillilllill
~~
~. . r!
~ LllJ
---:,,----------------
-oolr--------------
~ ~~~~~:~OOFl-~,._ _. _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ __
* :c':~; ~L;~Fl
* ~~e:.VFF_e
e.
'"
---- ~~;E--
~ LOWER lEVEL
'f il2'-5"FF.E
{=~ -------
-,-
-- '-..:
D
D
D
\
'~.-,--.-.-
8 :~~:~;~EVATION
~ -
~s::. :::.t'IENEEFlI'i ST.AlA TOWERS. rvp
I \
c-
=1 n-
11111111 ftItItI~ 1111111111 m 111111 HilttfIlllllL
.: - -/'ll. =
--,L. -
~ r' ~ . II 111111 II IHttIIt II 11111 1111
~ -- - -
=lil_n =L
~I
=In n~
_!
r:-=
JIIII m UlllllJiUm ~
=l. R=-
lBI ffiIl1llllllllJ 00
I
/
--.
eFl;CK VENEER 3 STAIR TOWEFlS. TV?
----
:::TCNE VENEER
lBUXELL
ARCHfficrURE. LID
9C'.lS:::!.:-.:!:~S'I"JU.r
~~~"1S..""'TAS~l
tU.'(5I;!.)J!"~lfAX:(S12J1U.OO4O
_:b.udL:o.
''''''''''"''''''''''
~l'~CCMMUNI'IUS
A..~'"t'tIll!
~~"!~~
0IW'Illl:S
1_"7~~rnaVlU._,
~::oor~~...u.......-
..._ott~XU_:>llISCl'I\.'ftlrYlS1IlII'
_m.o.r:.......~yaanllltlD
~__n05'"".-s0l'_
r.4:S0l'_sot4
/'fAR/(Rr~.1/
17428
_.""'"'--<.~,_..._.....
..."_.._...~.._.,,.......
_O'>n____....._
-..- .......- -..-..--
11_.....__....-
REVISIONS:
~~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ Q.,. er:::
,.,...... rJ1 ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
> ~ ~
~E--~
~ E-- rrJ.
~<
DEVELOPER:
FRAUE1'fSHUH
S"\VEE.l'ffiY
BUILDING 5
BUILDING ELEVA TIOH
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
DATE: OBJU4
PROmCf Nit D1026.5D
DESIGNED: .llf811JB
DRAWN flIB
AS.12
.
~~
l ~ ~ ;;1
00.
~ :$ <
. '~~ ~ ~ ~
~~riTilS
E-4 en
~
~
.
--
-
....0~_m.....
.fL---- . ., 'Ii"...
----
'-
--
-
"
SITE SECTION TO RIVER
"'"'-
.
SITE PLAN
Scale: 1" .. 50'-0.
J.BUXELL
ARCluJrNJ.JRE,LTO
9OONOR1H1HllU>mBBT
MJNNBAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5401
11!L:(fl2}33a.m3FAX:(612)3)U040
-JMMIlMI!I
UIlIlANPWlNlNG
OI'llNSl'ACIlCONNtJNmllS
A............"........d
LANDSCAPB~
.,....".
HARK RYAN
..". I
~_IY1_ ,..: ~1~~~.
1'1111 . - r'~~..u::=
~Ill_.___
;;';-'---1
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUB
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
SITE SECTION
DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
DATE: 10.05.04
PROJECT NR: 01026.50
DESIGNED: JHB,HJB
DRAWN HJB
.
.
.
i
,
I
!
~'...."..'..I........".i'.,
" , .
i _.. ,..,
l:' ....... "
'" . I
.. .! ,
[: '..'-/
~.-, --.'-. -:-',
-.:~- .::...,->'
..
"
n
I::
h
J.BU~~~
AR=11l1lD......~S401
MlNNBAPOLIS,. ~'11)538-m4O
TBL:(612)33':'~
1lItIWl PLANNINO
OPBNS.PACB~
AJt.Cl,..""".........:.
I.AIIDSCMII GBAI'IIICS
.-
.........
....
I.I!O.NL: _~.....
~~~;iS
-';;iMIt,~y
:;;';NS:
11428
~~
~~~
~~~
~ ~ ~
~iil~
~ ~ 00
~~
DEVELOPER:
FRAUENSHUH
SWEENEY
BUILDING 5
SITE SECTION
DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
DATB:
PROlECf NR:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN
10.05.04
01026.50
JH8,HJB
HJB
",J
'.
.
.
.
.
October 5, 2004
City of Stillwater, Minnesota
Mayor Kimble
Council member Junker
Council member Kriesel
Councilmember Milbrandt
Council member Rheinberger
Dear Sirs:
As neighbors and citizens of Stillwater, we support the Terra Springs project. However, we are
concerned about the request for a variance for increased height for Building #5, and we disagree
with the developer's method for calculating the height and number of stories.
Under the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) conditions, this building should conform to
the Central Business District (CBD) requirement of 50 feet or four stories on Main Street, where it
abuts the CBD. However, the proposed Building #5, as it faces Main Street, would be five stories
and 64 feet high to the mid-point of the roof It would have a peak height of?1 feet and be over 20
feet higher than Building #1, which also sits on Main Street. We do not think that a building of this
height is consistent with the PUD which you approved. It is also not consistent with the message
that has been communicated to the surrounding homeowners, downtown business owners and
residents of Stillwater.
We do not believe that a hardship exists which would justify granting this variance. In fact,
granting the variance will be injurious to some of the neighbors, as it will diminish or destroy their
river views and reduce property values. There are no special circumstances or conditions that
would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of this property if the variance is not granted.
Building #1, which was built by the same developer, was constructed within the 50 foot limitation,
on the same site and on a similar grade with no hardship to the developer.
Thank you for your consideration on this issue. We respectfully urge you to deny this variance
request.
1 / /'
.. /? .i //._
North Hill Residents: .' J <... 'l'1}
Fred Bassett, 1002 N. First St., Stillwater '--:.c~, '" L....-J 6'/~/U
Larry Lappi, Stillwater _ ~~ R ~ '
Paulette Lappi, Stillwat~~
TiM Michaud, 904 N. First St., Stillwater l~ ~\..v\
Sulci Thomsen, 913 N, Broadway, Stillwater ~~~
/
Tom Thomsen, 913 N, Broadway, Stillwater ~ ~
,Coldwell a;!Jnker aprnet lIMelcome$ }l,ou to
"',' ":::::0 "h;w' il;:/" :::ilb!;;;Ul1 "iii:H: fJ( ':m;iF 'ililU::1
"" 1 002 1 ST..STREET N. m
'.. i"~ ,.ilili. ,., .f",,,;dh, ,d," diii;L
, Swil~ Stillwater"'" Eiii "iiii;
$369,9;001
'0
-
-
- -
- - -- ..-
Foundation Size
Finished Square Feet
Year Built
Lot
School District
Tax Year
Taxes
Assessment Pending - No
Approximate Dimensions
1414
1964
1868
75X101
834
2004
1136
.
Living Room
Dining Room
Family Room
Kitchen
Master Bedroom
Second Bedroom
Third Bedroom
Fourth Bedroom
Foyer
Patio
Second Kitchen
Sitting Room
20X14
20X13
14X13
14X9
9X13
11X9
9X7
36X27
12X11
12X20
Air Conditioning
Central
Basement
Partial
Amenities - Unit
Patio
Hardwood Floors
Washer/Dryer Hookup
Bath Description
Main Floor 3/4 Bath
Upper Level Bath
Master Walk-Thru
Separate Tub & Shower
Whirtpool
Appliances
Range
Microwave
Exhaust FanlHood
Dishwasher
Refrigerator
Washer
Dryer
Dining Room Description
Kitchen/Dining Room
Existing Financing
Conventional
Association Fee Includes
NIA
Exterior
Wood
Assumable Loan
Not Assumable
Fuel
Natural Gas
--
---- - ....... - -- - ----~ ----........ - -.....
-...--
\;:
~'''t ~~
.. '\
4 Bedrooms 3 Bathrooms
Handicap Accessible Age 8 Years or Less
None
Second Unit
Heating Existing In-Laww/Kitchen
Forced Air Existing In.Law wlBath
LakelWaterfront Sewer
River View City Sewer - Connected
Lot Description Special Search
Tree Coverage - Medium Main Floor Laundry
4 BR on One Level
Parking Characteristics All Living Facilities on One Level
Attached Garage
Insulated Garage Terms
Garage Door Opener Conventional
Cash
Photo Code
I Will Send My Own Water
City Water - Connected
Roof
Asphalt Shingles -MORE***
Public Remarks -
GREAT, SCENIC VIEWS OF THE ST. CROIX! COMPLETELY UPDATED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM! ALL NEWER MAJOR
MECHS, UPPER LEVEL: 3 BEDROOMS, FULL BATH W/LAUNDRY HOOK-UPS & KIT/LR SPACE, HAS NEVER BEEN LIVED
IN AFTER '02 ADDITION! ALL APPLIANCES INCLUDED, 26X21 GARAGE.
.STEVE MACLEAN, GR/651-653-2559www.macleanhomes.com
Information Deemed Reliable But Not Guaranteed
~
~
BURNET
~rn
.
Terra Springs
Fact Sheet
Environmental Cleanup
The Terra Springs development has been the catalyst to dramatically improve the
environmental quality of a key property in downtown Stillwater. This was once a
vacant nine-acre site that had been partially contaminated by its use as a prison and
other subsequent businesses.
Terra Springs developer, Frauenshuh Sweeney, invested considerable time and
resources to identify and then clean up the contamination to ensure Terra Springs
exceeds strict state environmental requirements for residential living.
· The soil on the Terra Springs site was contaminated by petroleum and other
chemicals over decades of use as the penitentiary, as well as from vehicle
maintenance, manufacturing and warehousing, and for the storage of scrap iron, car
batteries, and transformers.
.
Working under the strict guidelines of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA)* and at the direction of Landmark Environmental, a respected Twin Cities
environmental firm, Frauenshuh Sweeney voluntarily cleaned up the contaminated
soil.
.
· Approximately $750,000 was spent to clean up the site, almost all of which was
paid for by the developer.
· The MPCA's Response Action Plan included identifying and removing
approximately 5,000 cubic yards of contaminated soils from the Terra Springs site.
The contaminated soil was transported ofT of the site to a pennitted landfill in
accordance with the Response Action Plan. Soils remaining on site were determined
through exhaustive laboratory- testing to meet and exceed the MPCA-approved soil
cleanup goals for residential, which includes playground uses.
· The Terra Springs project and the need to create new housing helped Stillwater
clean up- polluted land in the downtown area. Without the help and commitment
from Frauenshuh Sweeney, the City of Stillwater, and the State of Minnesota, this site
would have probably remained a polluted site for many years to come.
· In summary, all of the environmental issues related to the contaminated soils at Terra
Springs have been addressed in accordance with the MPCA-approved Response
Action Plan. Terra Springs site now exceeds MPCA standards for a residential
neighborhood development.
.
*The MPCA 's program included the Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program
(VIC) and the Voluntary Petroleum Investigation and Cleanup Program (vpIC).
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
CITY CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP
The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain:
1. PROPERTY. The property is described as Lot 2, Block 1, Cochran's Long Lake
Addition.
2. AMENDMENT. The property is rezoned from "AP" (Agricultural Preservation) to "LR"
(Lakeshore Residential).
3. ZONING MAP. The zoning map is changed to designate the property as LR (Lakeshore
Residential).
4. SAVING In all other ways, the City Code will remain in full force and effect.
5. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance will be in effect from and after its passage and
publication according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this
,2004.
day of
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
.
.
.
LEONARD, STREET AND DEI NARD
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
October 5, 2004
TIMOTHY J. KEANE
612-335-7192
tim.keane@leonard.com
Via Fax and Hand Deliverv
Mayor Jay Kimble and
Members of the City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082-4807
Re: Cochrane's Long Lake Addition - Peterson Rezoning
Dear Mayor Kimble and Members of the City Council:
This letter is offered on behalf of our clients, Wes and Deirdre Kramer, to object to the City
Council's adoption of the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order" prepared by the Stillwater
City Attorney, David Magnuson. The findings and conclusions reach well beyond the record
that was before the City and lack any basis in fact.
In particular, the Findings numbered 12 and 14 are unsupported by the record. A 20,000 square
foot lot is not compatible with the neighborhood, but instead represents spot zoning, and there
was nothing introduced in the record indicating that the AP zoning is inconsistent with the "land
use guide" nor the Comprehensive Plan.
More egregious, however, are the "conclusions" numbered 2-5. Those conclusions are expressly
contradicted by information and testimony placed on the record--not supported by the record.
There has been no evidence or testimony demonstrating that the zoning map amendment
requested by the Peterson satisfies the findings required by chapter 31 of the Stillwater Code,
subd. 29(24)f. There is not a shred of evidence in the assembled record to substantiate the
"public necessity" finding required in the Stillwater Code.
The rezoning will clearly constitute a special privilege to the benefit of only the Applicants.
Ample evidence and testimony was offered into the record that the rezoning will indeed be a
detriment to adjacent and surrounding properties in violation of the purposes of Stillwater
Zoning and Comprehensive Plan requirements. Additionally, the record does not support the
operation of Minnesota Statutes 9 15.99 as dispositive approval.
150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET SUITE 2300 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TEL 612-335-1500 FAX 612-335-1657
LAW OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS, SAINT PAUL, MANKATO, SAINT CLOUD AND WASHINGTON, D,C,
2536536vl
WWW.LEONARD.COM
.
.
.
October 5, 2004
Page 2
Moreover, Minnesota law demands that the City of Stillwater adopt contemporaneous findings to
support its land use decisions. Zylka v. City of Crystal, 167 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1969). These
findings, drafted by the City Attorney for approval two weeks after the zoning map amendment
was approved, are not contemporaneous as required by Minnesota law.
Thank you for consideration, and the inclusion of this correspondence in the above-captioned
record.
TJK:eck
cc: Steve Russell, City Planner
David Magnuson, City Attorney
Wesley and Deirdre Kramer
2536536vl
Sincerely,
LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD
Professional Association
~.
.~". -..... =--.,-,-:.-'.---"':"-:---~~--
.-<"
;
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF STILLWATER
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
In Re: The Application of Peterson
Case No. ZAM/04-02
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS AND
ORDER
The City Council convened the Hearing on September 21,2004 at the Council Chambers
in City Hall on the Application of Richard A. Peterson and Leah S. Peterson ("Applicants") to
rezone the property at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue (the "Property") from AP, Agricultural
Preservation to LR, Lakeshore Residential.
At the Hearing, the City Council considered the report of Steve Russell, the City
Community Development Director, testimony and exhibits submitted by the Applicants, the Staff
report and minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 12, 2004, the Staff report and
minutes of the City Town Joint Planning Board meeting of August 25, 2004, maps of the
Property, the testimony of neighbors, submittals and argument from lawyers for the neighbors,
and the Planning file prepared by City Staff for the Application.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the documents that have been made a part of this file,
upon the testimony of all those who offered it, and upon all the files, records and proceedings
herein, the City Council makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the Property at 7160 Mid Oaks Avenue was platted in 1973 as Lot 2, Block
One, Cochrane's Long Lake Addition, and contains 1.5 acres of area.
~
\
2. That at the time of platting, the property within the plat on the west side of Mid .
Oaks A venue was in the Town of Stillwater and the property on the east side of Mid Oaks
Avenue was in the City of Stillwater.
3. That the Property and all other land within the plat was and is now served with
municipal water and sanitary sewer service from the City of Stillwater.
4. That in August of 1996, the Property and all of the Stillwater Township part of the
plat became annexed to the City of Stillwater pursuant to an Agreement for Orderly Annexation
made between the City and Town of Stillwater on August 16, 1996.
5. That by operation of law and pursuant to a section of the City Code, all property
becoming part of the City by annexation is zoned AP Agricultural Preservation with the
requirement of a minimum lot size of 10 acres for each dwelling unit.
6.
The purpose of the AP zone is to insure that all property becoming part of the City
.
by annexation will be rezoned to a classification compatible with the development pattern of the
City and to a zone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
7. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City designates the Property and the area
adjacent to the Property as Large Lot Single Family Residential and the Comprehensive Plan was
last amended with reference to the Applicants' property in 1997.
8. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City provides that the largest City lot served
by municipal sewer and water services should be 20,000 square feet, and that it is not financially
feasible to provide these City services to lots with larger area requirements.
9. That property directly across the street from the subject Property that was within
the City of Stillwater when platted and not annexed to the City is zoned RA Single Family, a
zone that allows a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. .
- 2 -
r
. 10. That the Property has lake frontage on Long Lake and the property directly across
Long Lake is zoned LR, Lakeshore Residential with a minimum lot size requirement of 20,000
square feet.
11. That rezoning of the property will allow the Applicants to create one additional
lot of 20,000 sq. ft.
12. That a 20,000 ft. lot. as allowed by the standards of the LR District, is compatible
with the neighborhood, since it is that same zoning as that to the west of the Applicants'
property, and is compatible with the RA Zoning classification directly across the street to the east
of the Applicants' property.
13. That the published and mailed notice and hearing requirement of Minn. Stat.
~462.357, subd 3, were followed properly by City Staff.
. 14. That the present zoning of AP, Agricultural Preservation is not consistent with the
land use guide for the Property and the neighborhood of the Property contained in the
Comprehensive Plan as amended in 1997.
15. That the Applicants filed an application to rezone on June 4, 2004.
16. That a notice was not sent to the Applicants within 15 business days of filing the
application informing the Applicants that the application was missing some information.
17. That the 60 day deadline for City action on the rezoning application pursuant to
the terms of Minn. Stat. ~15.99 began on June 4,2004.
18. That this amendment was initiated by petition of the affected property owners and
referred to the Planning Commission as required by Minn. Stat. ~462.357, subd. 4.
19. That he Planning Commission met on July 12, 2004 and after deliberation, voted
. to recommend to the City Council that the zoning amendment be approved.
- 3 -
.....
20. That th~ Orderly Annexation Agreement between the Town and City of Stillwater .
requires that before the City Council may take action or any request for rezoning, the request be
heard and approved by the Joint Board.
21. That the Joint Board met on August 25, 2004 and after deliberation voted to
approve the rezoning.
CONCLUSION OF LA W
1. This matter was properly before the City Council pursuant to Minn. Stat.
g462.357, subd. 3 and 4 and the procedure set forth in the City Code.
2. That City Council action is necessary to classify the Applicants' property in a
zoning district that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The rezoning will not constitute a special privilege to the Applicants because the
LR District classification is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
4. That based upon the record, this amendment to the Zoning Ordinance will not be
a detriment to adjacent property and will further the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and
comply with the guide of the comprehensive plan.
5. That by operation of Minn. Stat. SI5.99, 'subd. 2, the request for rezoning was
approved on August 4, 2004.
.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
1. The application is hereby approved.
2. The ordinance amending the Zoning Map of the City and attached as Exhibit "A"
to this order is approved for second reading, adoption and publication.
Adopted by unanimous vote of the City Council this
day of
, 2004.
.
-4-
....
f
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, Clerk
- 5 -
.
.
.
Memorandum
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Diane Ward, City Clerk
9/29/2004
New Tobacco License - Liberty Village Wine & Spirits
An application for a transfer of the tobacco license for the Liberty Village Wine &
Spirits has been received.
Approval should be contingent upon filing all required documentation and final
approval by Police, Fire, and Inspection Departments.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If approved, Council should adopt Resolution No. 2004- , APPROVING A NEW
TOBACCO LICENSE FOR LIBERTY VILLAGE WINE & SPIRITS, INC.
.
APPROVING NEW TOBACCO LICENSE FOR LIBERTY VILLAGE WINE & SPIRITS
WHEREAS, a request for a new tobacco license has been received by Mr. Robert Hagstrom,
of Liberty Village Wine & Spirits, Inc., DBA: Liberty Village.
WHEREAS, all required forms have been submitted and fees paid.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IF RESOLVED that the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, hereby
approves the issuance of a tobacco license.
Adopted by Council this 5th day of October, 2004
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
.
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
~
.
.
.
.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
September 29, 2004
Future Use of Kollinier Park
p
The Parks Board (9-27-04) discussed the future use of Kolliner Park. The previously
approved Park Plan is attached. The future of the park was mentioned in the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the St. Croix River Crossing (see attached page14-
15).
Mr. Don Empsen was present to discuss his concern for loss of ownership of the Kolliner
Park property and its future use.
After review of the plan and the environmental document, the Parks Board felt that
ownership of the Kolliner Park property should be maintained by the City of Stillwater
and that possible passive recreational uses consistent with the sites open space/natural
character should be considered for future use.
The Parks Board felt the City should keep its options open for future use of Kolliner Park
dependent on a new bridge and the historic lift bridge.
Recommendation: Consider passing a resolution stating the City's interest in
maintaining ownership of Kolliner Park and opportunity for future passive recreational
use of the site (to be presented to MnDOT).
Attachments
F/lA,rl: E /5/ 5, (r",.'y I,)/'/~ fr
.
Support for the redesign of the master plan for affected parks: This potential mitigation.
item would include funding support from MnlDOT and Wis/DOT to the City of Stillwater to
revise master plans for the Stillwater Municipal Barge Facility Property or Kolliner Park for
alternatives that would substantially impair the city's ability to implement currently adopted
plans.
()
Restoration of Kolliner Park lands*: Non-historic elements would be removed from
Kolliner Park to facilitate a reversion to a more natural state. The City of Stillwater owns
Kolliner Park and has adopted a master plan for the site, which includes the development of
several recreational amenities (e.g., fishing pier, swimming beach). These improvements
could not be implemented if Kolliner Park lands are restored to a more natural state.
If restoration of Kolliner Park lands is identified as a mitigation element, additional
investigations would need to be conducted in the areas to determine potential impacts to
historic properties.
Land Use/Conservation Measures
· Covenants on excess property owned by MnillOT and WisillOT within the riverway:
This potential mitigation item would involve the placement of covenants on potential excess
properties from the 1995 Final EIS Preferred Alternative alignment to limit future
development uses. The amounts of excess property for each alternative are described in .
Chapter 5. These properties would eventually be resold as surplus property. Consistent with'
the CMP Land Use Regulation Guidelines, covenants would be placed on the properties that
would restrict redevelopment. The appropriate state agencies would be involved to ensure
the covenants are in conformance with this plan.
· Land use items: Recognizing the connection between land use and infrastructure
development, and the resulting potential impacts on the S1. Croix River, the DOTs would
assist with coordination of land use and infrastructure planning in the S1. Croix River valley
even though these issues are beyond the legal authority of the DOT's. This could include
land use planning support and funding assistance to local governments, regional
infrastructure planning support, and educational programs regarding land use (e.g., training
programs for local government officials andlor the general public).
· Land conservation items: Recognizing the potential for increased development in western
Wisconsin, several land conservation mitigation items have been proposed. Potential land
conservation mitigation items include protection of sensitive areas in western Wisconsin
vulnerable to development, financial contributions to the Western Prairie Habitat Restoration
Area3 program, financial contributions to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wetlands
protection areas, or the purchase of conservation easements.
3 A feasibility study and EIS for the Western Prairie Habitat Restoration Area (WPHRA) was published by the
Wisconsin DNR in 1998. The feasibility study and EIS outlined the WisDNR's proposal to acquire, restore, and .
protect grassland and wetlands within the WPHRA, which includes the western half of St. Croix County and
southern Polk County.
St. Croix River Crossing Project
14 - 15
AUGUST 2004
Supplemental Draft EIS
-.,
,'- ~<'OLLINER PARK
~
.
&e Master Plan for Kolliner Park seeks to return it to its former splendor as a
swimming beach with a historic limestone bathhouse. The bathhouse would be
located and deta~ed as close as possible to t,he originalJacility (constructed in .
1931) ~ ~hile ~onformh~g to current design standards.' It would include changing
rooms, portable toilets, and space for lifeguards. The existing beach, adjacent to
the bathhouse, with minimal improvements, would provide safe access to the water
for swimmers. A narrow lawn area extends south along the water, providing space
for picnicking and informal recreation. At the south end of the lawn is a public
fishing pier, connected to the bathhouse area by a paved path.
Access to the swimming beach is provided for cars by upgrading an existing
entrance road and parking lot for 20 cars. The plan also suggests the possibility of
a commercial water taxi mooring, which would provide an exciting means of visit-
~ the ~e~~ ~om downtown Stillwater or from the park at the Aiple.property,'
Wile mmlmlzlhg the impact of cars on the site.
North of Highway 64 and the historic lift bridge, the site remains largely
unchanged from its current natural state. Although the north end of Kolliner
Park was once home to rustic campgrounds, its most valuable use today is as a
natural backdrop to the river, as seen from downtown Stillwater. The existing
,ervice road is retained. Additional planting along the water's edge is
~ontemplated a,s a. means to enhance the value of the shoreline to birds and to .
. .
~ther Wildlife.
.
iiTi. D~Sl.:ri:otion of~..Pl . ..
~ :~>>::.-;, Y.:;-, ~~.' ~ . >of:.::;.,__' ":'-:'Y;f~i{~'- '~~~#f~rK~l~~~~!ai:~~r!dast~i;~~~~~.
ULT:.~~t~t~~':}J?:~;:;:J '.',t :'~.:;; . '~'-;_~e;i;: - ~;~~r.~:~~;':~~llc~;:.~i:tj!i:' ;;:.:~~;~tr~:),::{:}).:::: !;.::!t<-:'~!lr~' .: .~: }:'~' .: :~.. ~-~ :'\:~:'Jz.;~ .::'/?L~t .
.:' .:....}~~.; ~:':
-..
. .
~ 2$~ '00
M.M
100 YEAIHLOOO
ELEVATION 692
SHOllEV.'O EASeMENT
_ J>:lOPERlY LCIoE
2:JJ 1
, NORtH .
-. .:.
'. .....
WILDLIFE PLANTIN<:S
LIMITED ACCESS
GRAVEL DRIVE
: .' .
. '. ..' .. .....
. .....::.: . ....:~~.~;.< ~~:~~~~:~.::;:: ".(.\-;:.::~.~.~., ~-
~ATER :TAxI ~bbRINC ......,....
.. : PICNIC AREA
......
"
"
"'"!: ">.~ .~. -;- .
'-/!:, . RECONSImJcTED~~OOC(~-. A;:, (~~~:;
.' ,\:::;:\:}..:, '. ";',SWIMfv1ING BEACH '. ..;,',.. .... ';' ;.';/':
.... ....;~;;~"".:~:=::;r.~:i:~t.1~ti~!
PAVED pAll I
. ~ .;.' _.
LAWNMFJ.
fISHING PIEl\
.,' ',':-.'.
.';.'.
. ....
~'~. ,:.~.~. ~
. "::"':".:~~.;;;-
:'-'
. ~~:i. .... .:.
:if<./':.
. i-.::~!'"
'. "
..
. .'.
. .~ .:.~,..:"i~~..
,~~!;~~;~~1,t~'!~{~r~~Nf~2~t~ln~~~~;~ ;;.:~~i:?~?::('.: .
.r ~.go""~,,~,,,!! ~ '~',;,.,
.-;;:\:..~~.tIJ!lIIIj-}':.:.
-. ';~" .~'_ '.i~
_:)~ 'of .' .
.._..':.'
"-".
--. ... . ..; ..,
--- ....~
....-~
,
( '.
.
/
Jtr
;10
,
,
I
~
~
I
~
.
.~--~-
,-~' .... -"
r-""-.'--~-
~~- ,",:, ,"I......,il,,",IUII',II.~Ij/.\lr;i:',":::,.I',I.t '\.
~iL
C. Reconstructed Bath House,
Beach and Parldng
--,-
".
~~
_...,r..r')." ,r'~i! ....."""'....
_.' "'}-'. ''[:; "",(' ft. ,<'.':.. \'i';~;~>~( \.;.?< ~:;r
" ,.' \ . '. ...~ t....l.. ., y/ ).."
. - ',: \' '< ;' ,1~'~"'l1;'( Air.' ,
> : " ~ !.ff i r'.)' . ::.,' -~ if?;'" .~',
'~l\({. '~'. -1~:Xr~-. j l. <t/J\iil':> .' <~~'~)'.'I t'~-,.:'
It", . ~ ," 'I:..~l' ~ ~. ~'':ki.-
~ '.,J...;..I.:...C.' ~~ :'~~_c:~-::.,L,,~.
Swimmt~c beach
Edsdn&, IrCcs I Parling (or 20 can
10 remain
R<<onJnuctcd
!.'Ihhouse and
restroom
Listinrl~cs an. btufFlO remain
1998. Remnantl or hath hOllC and swimming beach.
._---"---..
~;~"'J' ''",__/--:..
---~--:-..-
\.-........- --...-~........~.-- _.-........~
~. J'"
...."--
, !
"
""r~-:..:0'
/;~...
'-. --.".
--
--:.-:--.~.-=-.
::."'-..--.-..:::=::-------.:::=
_;.-::-.a::=:.____ .
-.......
.-.
Reconstruction oChlstoric 'bath ho~.
---..;..::l =.;
f
Ii
. "~ "1 j~, 11, pr~ -l" n '!k''1
(;/ '~':'.~)' ~ \lw . t C j
f.- l\ A U l! W 'I ~""",~,~_._
-c!. ~ J <, Y '~'.oi,,,.,,,,.,",-~
~~tf,Q'. :~ .,.="''',.~.~,,::;~~
T H E~:~:7:~~:::~~I:: N E SOT A ~
\/
\
Reconstructed bath house Ooor plan.
Thorbeck Architects, Ltd.
~ ~()~line~p~~ti~::i~!~~:~:
CONsULnN~?~~iip.INC.tr;::-, '. .."'-':5' ~)~~k f'~,;>~>,..,.. Sept,eIl}ber 10, 1998
-
~..~.>
~f:W~~~r... '
?t!~~. .:..:, .>\~
i
...._,:-....- '., . ~ ..~ '..
.
cO
affect approximately 140 acres of the 310,178 acres of land in farmsl within St. Croix County.
The total acreage of farmland to be acquired varies with the optional alignments in Wisconsin for
Alternative C, affecting between 140 acres, or 0.05 percent (Alternative C - Option 1) and 110
acres, or 0.04 percent (Alternative C - Option 2) of the farmland in St. Croix County.
Alternatives D and Ewould affectapprQximatelyl04 acre~, orO.O~ percent, of the fannl~d in,
St. Croix'County. 'Farm owners would be compensated in accordance with 49'L:.t<K Part 24, the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (as
amended .
The Build ARernauvcs \'Vc::,ula--req111re the use of land from the Stillwater Municipal Barge
Facility property (the site of a plan~uture city park) for road and bridge construction,
although MnlDOT will allow some park facilities to occur within the right of way beneath the
Alternative C, D, and E bridges (e.g. parking lot, fishing pier, and trails). Alternative B-1 would
require about 1.4 acres to be used for the construction of a park access road (consistent with the
park master plan) and some temporary construction impacts may result during the reconstruction
of TH 95. Alternative C would require the acquisition of approximately 3.6 acres from the
southern end of the property, whereas Alternatives D and E would require approximately 9.9
acres and 8.6 acres, respectively, primarily at the northern end of the property. For Alternatives
D and E, this represents approximately 58 and 51 percent, respectively, of the total property area
(17 acres). .
.
Two of the four Build Alternatives, Alternative D and E, would require acquisition of land from
Kolliner Park for road, bridge, trail, and storm water pond construction. Alternative B-1 and C
would not require the acquisition of any lands from Kolliner Park, although some temporary
construction impacts may result during the removal of the existing STH 64 roadway with the
option of converting the Lift Bridge to a pedestrianlbicycle facility. Alternative D would require
the acquisition of 6.9 additional acres of park property; Alternative E would require the
acquisition of 7.2 additional acres of park property. This represents approximately 14 and 15
percent of the total property area (49 to 58 ac.res, depending on St. Croix River water level).
Under Alternatives B-1 and C, where the Lift Bridge is converted to a pedestrianlbicycle facility
and the Wisconsin approach roadways are removed, some proposed amenities in the 1998 Master
Plan for :K.olHner Park could not be implemented as illustrated in the plan. : Vehicular access
would no longer be available to the site. However, the site would still be accessible to
pedestrians and bicyclists via the Lift Bridge from Lowell Park and downtown Stillwater.
Under Alternatives D and E, some proposed amenities in Stillwater's 1998 Master Plan for
Kolliner Park could also not be implemented as described above for Alternative B-1 and
Alternative C. The park would also continue to be physically bisected by the STH 64 roadway.
.
I From 2002 Census of Agriculture (USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service). Acreage designated as land in
farms consists primarily of agricultural land used for crops, pasture, or grazing (2002 Census of Agriculture
Appendix A - General Explanation).
COuJ:'cKATING AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
St. Croix River Crossing Project
14 - 3
JUNE 22,2004_
Supplemental Draft EIS
-
'.
\-
Mitigation of impacts on future implementation of the Kolliner Park..Master Plan would be .
provided in consultation with the City of Stillwater (as owners of the park property).
14.1.4 Lower St. Croix National Scenic River~ay
.. '. .' ." '" . . . ~. .
The Build Aiterriatives wo~ld"result 'in ad~erse,vi~ual and 'recr~atfonarimpacts'on the St. Croix'
Riverway with the construction of a new river bridge crossing. Several measures have been
proposed to mitigate the impacts of the Build Alternative on the St. Croix River and the river
valley. especially scenic and recreational impacts on the Riverway. (See Section 14.2).
14.1.5 Visual
Construction of anyone of the four Build Alternative bridges over the S1. Croix River would
cause an adverse impact on the existing visual setting. Although impacts resulting from a new
river crossing would be mitigated to the extent feasible through design considerations, the
presence of the bridge would result in visual impacts on residents. recreationalists, and tourists in
the area. Visual impacts of the Build Alternative on the S1. Croix River Valley cannot be
.avoided, as the bridge is a key component of each alternative. Several mitigation items have
been identified for these visual impacts to the Lower S1. Croix National Scenic Riverway (see
Section 14.2.1).
. .
[To ~e ~ortfi!IDed through addition,al discussions.]
.
14.1.6 Noise
The Build Alternatives would result in year 2030 noise levels exceeding the Minnesota daytime
and nighttime state noise standards at several locations in the Minnesota portion of the project
area. In Wisconsin, the Build Alternatives would also result in noise levels that exceed the state
definition of "noise impact" at several locations. All Build Alternatives would increase noise
levels near the existing STH35/64 roadway and 20th Street. See Chapter 8 for a discussion of
noise levels along the project corridor and potential noise mitigation. Noise mitigation will be
analyzed along the project corridor with the selection of a Preferred Alternative and presented in
the Supplemental Pinal EIS.
, .
.' . '. .
Peak~hour .traffic noise ievels -froin' the Build' Alternatiy~ 'bridges would meet' t>r 'exceed federal
noise abatement criteria (70 dBA) at the river'level directly below the bridges, continuing to a
distance approximately 100 feet north and south of the Build Alternative bridges' centerline at
river level. The Alternative D bridge would meet federal noise abatement criteria to a distance of
200 feet from the centerline of the bridge. Mitigation of noise impacts on the St. Croix River
through the installation of noise walls or other structures are not' proposed for the Build
Alternatives due to the negative impact these structures would have on the views to and from the
river.
e
COOPERATING AGENCY REVIEW DRAFT
St. Croix River Crossing Project
14-4
niNE 22.2004
Supplemental Draft EIS
+ . -.
. . -~_.._------------ -+---
~!~~:S-;;Hf?-~-T~:'~-'.':'~~:~~~~~~~~5:r~'!~",~_
--
k/,/. //z....~
A'~d/> ~/; - c ""'" ~.f:P/1-, .._._u.._u._.___..__,____. __..... .__. _ _ ___._______._.__.._.. u __U. ___U._._ h_____
----- / have::. /f<!!!'aL_o/.L,,6fL..t/) k/'e$/Y&i!-/f ~ e:-CC1?-4r 4/?hc/~....-(~..___.
. u~fle-.~C:dLL2..~wf/Q/~C"L:'~_._Q"p~o/. ~.h~ 4/uP'e ?J/ ~c/hp/ /' _ .
u' /~ctA.!~ e1./N4y$..--Cc:?d~.J!-~~4mt::-r/c:.a.n (.6J.9/~ .k~~t?~'::,f,-'--- .-
r:--ht:::..$?f- C!-/'.~jJL-~veL__-t7WrJ6'd ~y ?~e6//.7'j&)/ f?7//Wo~e/';' .
.
de. ~~L(t?kl~ o/',J?,v C;>)/d/'e.)5~[t //J ~he- 4/'r/ck /t:1/'e-
.f~/l/ Cin _/t:'k4/~ $bc- l:1/?/? /tP W' //7"l?t&-/?/.,fe ~~ ?4c;./CU4~
11I~/Ch ?t?~<<Ig,e C:-#?1J'/d/!?/'eL'L ~>L co// ~P/, /:he- h/7r~/'y
t?~ hfe .c:://y~ PW.Ot~"'fft~ t::'/t/~/'~Ae /c??/ .?C'C.LC:::-rlry YCEP/'.$.
T:4c::- C:-/ ~y #ij.f Ot:;(/ c-/ c{(J'/?t: c:r/Jf' :/-h/7.lfJ N/.,L,,4 4c!?:- /a-u.rt:...
4~ t?W/J //) t4?~ C:#?7~/rJ, wh/ch t:A/4 f/l Y ~,.,vif){../9h/ <PV~
//} -zf'P/ Cl/'"bc/~ / /
.
c!P/7 ~/*r r4:-c; h //Pw//71' /t7//?h,'
/,. ~~ ~ / /-y //?"'?4? /'1~.e:' f C1 // PWC::r'( ~... kcc-/ '"'f,/er/&:; -
hp'#>e ~plc:; ,.fur// ~ttt!-6i/J/ ~~ 4~N" /~ ~,-z...
~4.c:. :"1.t?/lM >- /r-k p~- :?,kc- '..-?/7 ke.y~.. .
- z, 7:4e. 4-rYlC~/c-a.-n Le9/o-M..- /'l~/ ~R c(ct/e/<7ft-&!'J~t
~..4c ~W/rV1 /Yl1i'?7 $~h Wr/-h /h qa-/-4 hdJ?/7e...
~t. C--4/'tS, /-a k~ /" f h c:rU; ~,
~/ W~t:?/I ./-Ac /I~ !..~.c..{t:!/1'>? (tl/'c:.h k4'r j./(7/i"/7'~~
//1.///79 ~--ie'/I~ ~~_-!~~i wa.$- n/Kerl ~f/t;'r -b-y
~/J C;//7' ~~'7s / fe? '//Yf/-~4/{ {?/ /f/l/re- /1'7~. //
.~4't::.-. c//;!.__~/f ~t!4~~c..~pr.R-~. . /
t/ T4c: /(7~c-e ,/ar/fr~:':/~_6..~/ t?t/t!Z,/J ~ ~h/.? d~
hCI? /J.~51'... ~l;tC/1___;[t;'..~(t3rC ,p~. :/(,()t1}~n /~e__f~.._
-.t!/'~/';"',?~UI1/:/,-__~d~e.f-E/J!,~d fn//wPl /-~/'~6~~e .
~'" de>- ?/,y -Pt/(/C.d/ 1WLIJ!1;yY(119. ifo~c:-.4 n~ -
L:-_I//y .44 ie..Ut/./L4. __~k-4?1e/' ~V tI'I~~/l ~? -:;:/!.~ Y
~ ~e .f?_ 0~i_t::/;E~..6ft'-//;c: V1P> ~/,..Lc;T~~_fl.~4;
b.4c:; /~;$' /c/t?R ~!:.ttr'.!fI.4-..f.j{..ft?ijv/Y)e:..,/eJ(1'~/&L
.ly ct/?;:7/7fL///-~/,?t//-h,'./7P./tf.w~,,1c- /n-~V-7 .
, ..ri? ~y..~I1e.w/e-~~_!lfj1"l//~t!UC ,fy 7t?k/,--- .
. h(fe/}'Uy~~.'~o .hf{ 14~,~~If;; _~~~~~/!:?!!/.Z ~./.<~//7<<.
.~~ /f//'e-$~/?./ /N//1 h~_;/p_./~::~=._~~/:~"?L!!.7/l&~_/1'J .q--
/J4'~L/~q( .["!!-a!!=._a~.~~.fL<~~ :/C~ h4'~ 1!.~~~'!.~. ~<~
,ferc//c-c;. /~ ~~ ?h:1?~C~~.'!!....t~_!:!,f~ /,!,rq1~?/~ ..~~ ~/';
..
,
4'.0* .
.,
'-. - . *.~!.:"_.L~~~. ~!:~rT?_._.X~~r .e!-~i~Z2.t1':!l_.._~p.~ ~,e~'~/' ~ .
#~ .,;f 0 1'/ w/!.~. ~~~c...~'!.(~&~__4 f..! ~~~~ne'?/ / //15 $'.(/ P?t?'~
,__._~a;L .:0-~~~. .f:t(!!'/ -?/'::-!~.E._._tf~~_~~~~~?P- ~t/t!i3/' "?.k~
~/v'~/' ~ ./-~e~/!p/"'k'. ., / ~!".~, ~k~_~~ r:~~.c//y' .; ~ . ., . .
'//1 aI)Y..,a7.t?~/7-/~ h' P,fV/J.. ~t?~t:?~c$/".q:~e 4-:. //~."L
~/'/d~c:;.., /r t-V/// ;?-/'t::.4'r CI/J'y .-6r//lyc;- c:e....c/'~~5 ;-Lhe,
/' / V e.: ~'</f ~ h k~ /..4 e. -w/ 7" < 07-! j"//7 / d41c-t/ / /- P /"'-(-"1-5
- vW//h ./7e.f/~&-~
/ ,Lc;et/ .?v /)~ /-w/"~ /.,y //(J>1A.!//77 /"/i/~'/ avw& /~ rPC01k6
Clre a /nP/'e, /h?/~d-/'/-ap~"L /C=9C<'-C:Y /-.4rc-n a .h7t::)'rz /1-?~
hr/d~e" /.r/j r- ClI'? ~n pk f h-Mc/e.-fl, r~ WI/J~ /,It-'("'r ??/7d..-
~,4~ e.;:::"cr7/,r,f- r:P' R~~t/ /'/ u/lkC ~{' /'7,/J/~ hne, C"t-
~c~/' h/shr/? '7/,L/ ~~;LL//'v j'~/le/7~//~'41~ ;/;,.c;~'1
a/ /' I"'~/' 1/1,//"?h a/ rU>/y ef ,h// ~/f//,I?C / "- ' 11-./ /
~-4/1'lk /,/- /S .
J> -? c;c;;e 0/.
f4~.ff; pr
.
-.
"'I 'II II ~II .
v
.
.
.
j(~\t<NEaSO'4l
:D :=
... ""
~ 0
"'1- ~
?- OF 11'f>-"
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
~~
,
September 28, 2004
Subject: Stillwater Lift Bridge Repair Project -- Repackaging
Agency Coordination
The Stillwater Lift Bridge Repair Project was let on August 27,2004 with the lowest bid
exceeding both our engineering estimate and the momes available for this project, This caused
all of the bids to be rejected. It has been decided to re-package the bidding docmnents and
advertise for bids with a new letting date of November 19, 2004, A November letting was
selected because any later date would not allow the contractor sufficient time to order the
equipment and materials required for the work.
Our construction, maintenance and bridge offices met with HNTB and discussed repackaging
alternatives. Discussions with bidding contractors indicated that the very short timeframe for
bridge closure was a major reason why bids were high_ Contractors mentioned the overtime
costs were significant. Contractors also mentioned that the material costs on some items were
high.
A list of items is being considered that could reduce costs in both materials and time. These
items were deemed the least critical for the bridge operation and safety. Items that would be
removed from the previous bid document and repackaged into a new project includes:
1) Drainage deflection devices: time/material, deck concrete will have a lip in these areas to
address problem. Replacement of wire ropes for the counterweights and sockets: their
conditions allows flexibility of their replacement timing. Temporary structural support will
then not be needed to support the lift span. Trumon bushings: since wire rope work would be
eliminated, this will not be necessary at this time.
2) Paint System and corresponding blasting/cleaning: The Paint System previously specified
included providing an encapsulation bladder to capture the sand blasting debris, These items
will be changed to involve a power tool clean and vacumn only for the majority of the
repainting areas. An encapsulating bladder will still be used but only on the lift span under the
Tenders House machinery area. The paint system will be Epoxy Mastic. No debris will fall into
the river with these systems.
3) Nmnber of replaced rivets will be reduced.
An equal opportunity employer
'"
4) Concrete surface repairs: repairs will be made near the pier caps only. Since there will now
not be any underwater concrete repairs, a dewatering system will not be necessary.
5) Time Change:
.
To reduce the overtime costs, three weeks will be added to the bridge closure next summer,
resulting in a closure of 13 weeks rather than 1 O. Therefore, the full closure would start the
Monday after Lumber Jack Days (August 1, 2005) and run into late October, 2005.
It is anticipated that these revisions will result in a reduction of both time and material costs so
that bids near or less than the engineer's estimate should be expected.
With repackaging this project, there are no additional envirorunental, social or economic
impacts anticipated beyond what has been previously documented in the Project
Memorandum.
The items that are being removed with the repackaging of this project will be considered as
future repair needs of the Lift Bridge.
Please respond back if your agency has concerns with the repackaging of this project.
Sincerely,
q?v:4~ f/{4
Richard Martig, P.E.
.
Enclosed - revised schedule
C: Rick Arnebeck
Todd Clarkowski
Keith Molnau
Steve Kordosky
Paul Kivisto
Kevin Western
Phil Erickson
Pat Kern
Terry Pederson
Stakeholders involved in Stillwater Lift Bridge Repair Project
.
"
.
.
.
UJ/11!~UU4 ~J:~U
t)~U 4.Y:141 U-->
r f-<L_ji....... U~ G..i.
STILL WATER TOWNSHIP
October 14,2004
Stillwater Town Hall
. ,-v-'\
[) \J~\"~
" ~~\q.
Regular Meeting: 7:00 P,M,
Chair: Untiedt
t\2enda: Adopt
Minutes: Approve Minutes: Regular Town Board Meeting September 23, 2004
Treasurer: 1, Claims and Checks
Attornev: 1, Adams Address Issue
2. Loe Encroachment Agreement
Planner: 1. Rezoning Conservancy To Agriculture-Meinecke,et at
2. A TV and Motorbike Ordinance
3, Silver Creek Corridor Plan
4. Garofalo Sign Permit
5.
~m!:ineer: 1 Finish Parking Lot
2. Tree Cutting Bids
Clerk:
1. Mise,
Committees: J, Park Comminee
2. Planning Commission
;PeoDle Portion:
8:00 pm.
Old Business: 1, Costs Sound Level Devices
2.
New Business: 1.
Adiourn:
9/2412004
Pat BantIi
09/18/2004 03:20
5514394705
PAGE 03
Changes To Note
October 13 Budget Meeting at 7:00 PM Town Hajj
October 11 Park Meeting Cancelled Due To Columbus Day Holiday
Oetobet 28 Public Accuracy Test General Election Ballot at 6:00 PM Town Hall
November 2 General Election 7;00 AM to 8:00 PM Town Hall
November 4 Canvas Of Election 6:45 PM Town Hall
November 11 Town Board Meeting Cancelled Due To Veterans Day Holiday
November 18 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM Town Hall
November 25 Town Board Meeting Cancelled Due To Thanksgiving Holiday
December 23 Town Board Meeting Cancelled Due To Christmas Holiday
'v
.
.
.
l::l':J/lj/Ll::ll::J4 tltl: Y::i b:.l'lj'j'lltJ:> rl4l.:Jt. U~ { G1
"
Stillwater Township
. Calendar
Chair Untiedt
October 7 Planning Commission 7:00 PM
October 13 Budget Meeting 7:00 PM
October 14 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM
* October 18 Parte Committee - Columbus Day Cancelled
October 28 Public Accuracy Test 6:00 PM
October 28 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM
Chair Doriolt
.
November
November
November
November
November
November
November
.
.
Chair Doriott
December
December
December
December
.
2 Election Day
4 Planning Commission
4 Canvas Of Election
11 Town Board Meeting - Veterans Day
8 Park Committee
18 Town Board Meeting
25 Town Board Meeting
7:00 AM - 8:00 PM
7:00 PM
6:45 PM
Cancelled
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
Cancelled
2 Planning Commission
9 Town Board Meeting
13 Park Committee
23 Town Board Meeting
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
Cancelled
* Meetings cancelled due to holidays
Town Board Supervisors may attend any or all of the above meetings.
All meetings are held in the town hall unless otherwise specified.
.
Pat Bantli
Clerk, Stillwater Township
September 26, 2004
'v
.
September 23, 2004
STIL.-L,WATER TOWN BOARD MEETING
Town Hall
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson Sheila-Marie Untiedt, Supervisors Duane Laabs,
David Johnson, Jim Hiniker and Jim Doriott. Also, Treasurer
Gloria Sell, Planner Dick Thompson, Attorney Soren Mattick
and Police Chief Steve Nelson.
Public Hearinq
Lee and Stacey Hendrickson live at 11144 Norell Avenue North in Stillwater
Township and are requesting a variance from the front yard set-back requirement
on a proposed addition to the existing structure. The house is considered pre-existing
and a non-conforming structure. It was made non-conforming when Washington
County obtained additional right-of-way for Norell Avenue years ago. The addition
is non-conforming, also. The proposed addition will not increase the non-conformity.
The planner recommends the granting of a variance from the set-back requirement for.
this project.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P John'son/Hiniker moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(5 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Hiniker/Doriott moved to approve the 9/9/04 Stillwater town
board meeting minutes as written. (5 ayes)
3. HENDRICKSON VARIANCE DECISION. - M/S/P Hiniker/Laabs moved to approve a
variance for Stacey and Lee Hendrickson per the planner's recommendation. (5 ayes)
4. TREASURER-
a. Claims were reviewed and checks numbered 16922 through 16946 were
approved for payment.
b. The treasurer is to check with the engineer regarding the Washington County
invoice for striping township roads.
5. ATTORNEY-
a. MjSjP JohnsonjHiniker moved to approve a conservancy easement for the .
Curtis lot as presented. (5 ayes)
b. Attorney Mattick is to contact the Curtis attorney to withdraw the variance
req uest.
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 9/23/04
Page Two
.
c. The Adams address correction is in process.
d. The planning commission members will look at the current ordinance #51
regarding swimming pools for any changes they feel are needed.
6. PLANNER-
a. John Bower expressed that he did meet with concerned landowners regarding
the proposed Silver Creek Corridor Management Plan. Some changes will be
made to the draft. The township will receive the changes to review. It is
hoped that the final draft will be adopted as soon as possible.
b. Mary Meinecke and neighbors are jointly petitioning to have a rezoning of
their properties from conservancy to agriculture.
c. Discussion continued regarding the park plan specifically donations and trails.
7. CHIEF OF POLICE -
a. A letter was sent to Quail Avenue residents regarding the speed limit on that
road. Only one response was received requesting speed limit signs. The
road will continue.to be monitored for speed issues.
b. It was requested that DNR be contacted regarding not allowing guns for hunting
in the Arcola Trail Park.
8. PARK MEMBER APPLICATION - M/S/P Johnson/Hiniker moved to appoint Barbara
. Riehle to the park committee. (5 ayes)
9. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
Approved
.
Diane Ward
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Raddatz [Pat. Raddatz@co.washington.rrln,us]
Thursday, September 23,2004 1 :51 . PM
Pat Raddatz
Washington County BOard Agenda - 9/28/04
..
Washington County Board of Commissioners
1494962nd Street North
Stillwater,MN 55082
Washington County Board Agenda
September 28, 2004 * 9:00 a.m.
L 9:00 - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
2. 9: 00 ~'Cbmments from the -Public
Visitors may share their comments or concerns on an}" issue thatis'a responsibility or
function of Washing.ton County. Government, whether dr. not thei.s.sue is . listed on this
agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board mustfilY out a. cpl1)ment card before the
meeting begins and give it to the County Board secretary or the, County Administrator. . The
County Board Chair will ask you to come to. the podium, state your name and. address ,and
present your comments. . You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five
minutes ~ The Board Chair reserves' the right to limit an individual' spresentation:if it
~~~~mi: ~:~~n~in~~.~~{~~~~~i ~~~n~;~~,l~e:~;~ii~~i ~~~:~..,. o5T~~ ;~a'~.~.',. M~~;Ii ;~Vi{~i iO tb: ~~:t.
of individual presentations t.o accommodate. the scheduled agencIaitems. .
3. 9:10 - Consent Calendar
4. 9: 10 - community Services. * Suzanne Pollack, Supervisor
Recognition of Two ; Family Child Care Providers .
5. 9:30. - Transportation and Physical Development * Sandy Cullen, Transpbrtation Manager
I-35WE Coalition Joint. Powers Agreement
6. 9 :35 ~ Assessment, Taxpayer Services, and Elect.ions * Bogdan Filipescu, Accounting
Supervisor
Change of Classification of Tax~forfeited Pa.rce.tstd Non-conservation
7. 9:40 - General Admini!:?tration * Jim Schug, County Administrator
AMC Achievement Awards
8. 9:50 - Commissioner Reports * Comments - Questions
This period of time shall be used by the C:ommissioners< to repoI:tto the full Board on
committee activities, make comments on matters Qfinterest and i I]. format ion, or raise
questions to the staff. This action is not intended to resultinsubstant:iveboard action
during this time. Any a.ction necessary because of discussion.will be scheduled for a
future board meeting.
9. Board Correspondence
.
10. 10:05 - Adjourn
1
11. 10:10 - 2005 Department Budget Hearings
-Library
~county Attorney
-Sheriff
-Court Administration
12.11:40 to 12:15 - Board Workshop with Transportation and Physical Development
TH 36 St. Croix River Crossing Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement
************************************************************************
Meeting Notices
September 27 - Library Board
6:30 p.m., 8695 Central Park * Woodbury
September 28 - Planning Advisory Commission
7:00 p.m. Washington County Government Center
September 29 - Mosquito Control Exec. Commission
9:00 a.m., 2099 University Avenue West * St. Paul
September 29 - League of Local Governments
6:00 p.m., Prom Center * Oakdale
September 30 - Resource Recovery Board Meeting & Workshop
8:30 a.m., MCIT, 100 Empire Drive * St. Paul
.***********************************************************************
ashington County Board of Commissioners
Consent Calendar * September 28, 2004
Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring
discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar
item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
Administration
A. Approval of the September 7 and 14, 2004, Board meeting minutes.
Community Services
B. Approval of child foster care daily basic maintenance, initial clothing allowance, and
Difficulty of Care (DOC) rates for 2005.
Public Health and Environment
C. Approval of resolution, Solid Waste Management Tax of $27.09 per ton as the "market
price" and authorization for the Department of Public Health and Environment to submit the
updated market price and supporting documentation to the Minnesota Office of Environmental
Assistance.
D. Approval of resolution, application for a Phase II Clean Water Partnership Grant to
address high nitrate levels in the groundwater in the Cottage Grove area.
.. Approval of agreement with the City of Hugo for distribution of curbside recycling
unds up to $30,849 over the 2004 and 2005 grant cycle.
Sheriff
F. Approval to transfer ownership of Washington County Sheriff's Office K-9 "Storm" to
2
his handler, Sergeant Doug Anschutz.
~
Transportation and Physical Development
G. Approval of resolution, final payment to Advanced Masonry Restoration in the amount o~
$17,438 for the Historic Courthouse chimney replacement.
H. Approval of Washington County/City of Hugo Cooperative Agreement for CSAH 8
construction cost reimbursement and maintenance and approval of agreement for the transfer
of a potion of CSAH 8 to the City of Hugo.
Pat Raddatz, Administrative Assistant
Washington County
Phone: (651) 430-6014
e-mail: pat.raddatz@co.washington.mn.us
.
.
3
Diane Ward
.rom:
ent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Raddatz [Pat.Raddatz@co,washington,mn,us]
Thursday, September 30, 2004 11 :50 AM
Pat Raddatz
Washington County Board Agenda - 10/5/04
Washington County Board of Commissioners
14949 62nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Washington County Board Agenda
***Please Note Change in Time***
October 5, 2004 * 10:15 A.M.
8:00 to 9:45 -Employee Recognition Reception Hosted by County Board
Lake Elmo Inn
3442 Lake Elmo Avenue North
1. 10:15 - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
2. 10:15 - Comments from the Public
Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or
~unction of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this
~genda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the
meeting begins and give it to the County Board secretary or the County Administrator. The
County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and address, and
present your comments. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five
minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it
becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue
that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. The chair may also limit the number
of individual presentations to accommodate the scheduled agenda items.
3. 10:25 - Consent Calendar
4. 10:25 - General Administration * Jim Schug, County Administrator
5. 10:30 - Commissioner Reports * Comments * Questions
This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on
committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise
questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action
during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a
future board meeting.
6. Board Correspondence
7.10:45 - Recess
8.10:45 - 2005 Budget Hearings
-Housing and Redevelopment Authority
~suPPlemental Requests & Discussion/Decision Points and Outstanding Issues
9. 11:30 to 12:15 - Board Workshop with Transportation and Physical Development
Review Twin Cities Regional Transportation Policy Plan Comments
1
'-
~O. 12:15 - Lunc~
11. 1: 00 - Executive (Closed Session) * .Human Resources Department
.
Negotiation Strategy for 2D05, 2006 and 2007
12. 1:45 ~ Adjourn
* * * * * * ** * ** * ***"* * * ** * * **'* *-* * * ** * * * ** * *.** * ***:* *** *'* '* **-* * ** *** ** * * **-* * * * * *
Meeting Notices
October 6 - Plat Commission
8: 30 a.m., Washington County Government Center
October 6 - Metro.Transitways Development Board
8:30 a.m., 125 Charles Avenue West * St. Paul
October 7 - M~tro Energy Task Force
1:00 p.m., 2099, University Avenue West * St. Paul
.***********************************************
*******************
Washington County Board of Commissioners
Consent Calendar * October 5, 2004
Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routinebusiness,.not requiring
disc-iIssion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar
item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
The following items are presented for Board approval!a.a.option:
Administration
A. Approval of the September 21, 2004 BOard meetirig minutes..
B. Approval to designate the 2004 Association of MinnesotaCounti~s offic.i,al delegate
list.
..
Assessment, Taxpayer Services ariclElections
C. Approval of resolution, conveyance of tax-forfeited. land for <:l:nauthorizedpublic.use.
Community Services
D. Approval of resolution designating. a labor standards officer ,and environmental review
officer for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME programs.
Public Health & Environment
E.Approval to establish the 2005 fee schedules for Hazardous Waste Generators, Solid
Waste Facilities, Individual Sewage Treatment syst.ems(ISTS), Food/Beverage/Lodging
Program, Public Pools, Manufa.ctured Home Parks/,'Recreational Camping Area/Youth Camps and
Private Well Water Testing. .
F. Approval and execution by Board Chair and Administrator of.agreement with the City of
Mahtomedi for distribution of curbside recycling Tunds: .
G. Approval to enter into an agreement with the City of Aftonto:provide Operation and
Ma.intenance $ervices to the 201 Collector Systems.
H. Approval of inter-county agreement withAnoka,Catver, Da.kota,Hennepin and Ramsey
Counties for reciprocal use of household hazardous waste facili.ties and authorize '.'
execution by Board Chair and Administrator. '
Transportation and Physical Development
,
I. Approval Of resolutiori.suppO"rting Alternative B'-.1. for the st. Croix River Crossing and
2
approval for the Board Chairman to sign the County's comments on the Supplemental Draft
Environmental Impact Statement.
J. Approval of
~epartment and
K. Approval of
Development to
of Newport.
resolution, bids for sale of houses and buildings for the Highway
Parks Big Marine Park expansion.
resolution, authorizing the Director of Transportation and Physical
install and maintain stop signs at CSAH 18 and CSAH 20 located in the City
Pat Raddatz, Administrative Assistant
Washington County
Phone: (651) 430-6014
e-mail: pat.raddatz@co.washington.mn.us
.
.
3