HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-06-03 CC Packet
ttEGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 03-12
Council Chambers, 216 North Fourth Street
June 3, 2003
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
1.Police Chief 3. City Clerk
2.Fire Chief 4. Director of Admin.
5. Community D
6. City Engin
Discussio
Lightin
poss'
Distr
Area
City Attorney
City Administrator
Budget Information
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Discussion on Fees
a. Proposed development charges for seal coating
7:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Observance of Flag Day-
AALL TO ORDER
"OLL CALL
e 14, 2003 - Julie Kink
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is
the meeting agend
to staff regarding'
regular meeting minutes
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approval of a
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGA
1. Presentation of retirement pi
2. Request to ring church bel
3. Amy Senn, 602 N 5th Stre
4. Request for financial s
C MENDATIONS
attner
s Church (Margot Rheinberger)
t for variance to the noise ordinance
Park Elementary School Playground Project
the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of
il may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction
. ation of the concerns expressed.
CONSENT AGE
1. Resol , directing payment of bills
2. Res 1, approval of Change Order #1 for 2002 sidewalk project (available on Tuesday)
3. Reso 03-123, approving Minnesota premises permit for gambling for K of C Council
1632, 19 uth Greeley Street, Stillwater, MN.
4. Resolution 003-124, approving Minnesota premises permit for gambling for Stillwater Lodge
#179 BPOE, 1905 South Greeley Street, Stillwater, MN.
.~FINISHED BUSINESS
1. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comments for Territorial Prison (Resolution)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. ZAM/03-02. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from Jeff and
Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi Larson for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot.
from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 We
Olive Street. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette
on May 23, 2003.
2. Case No. SUB/03-36. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from Jeff and
Gina Melstrom for the subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel 0 0 square feet
located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residentia otices were
mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on M 003.
(Resolution if approved),
3. Case No. V103-38. This is the date and time for a public hearing to cons!~~r an a afof the Planning
Commission's decision on a request from Billy J. Elliot for a variance t tl1e'front setbacks (corner
lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction 0 located at 1010 4th
Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were ffected property
owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
4. Case No. V/03-41. This is the date and time for a public heari
Commission's decision on a request from David and Jeanne
setback (5 feet required, 3' 1" requested) for construction 0
located at 1323 2nd Street South in the RB, Two Family
affected property owners and published in the Stillwat a
5. Case No. PUD/03-48. This is the date and time for a lie
Development for a Final Planned Unit Development, L L
(three buildings) located on Parkwood Lane in T 0
mailed to affected property owners and publishe
(Resolution)
6. Case No. PUD/03-27. This is the date and time for ublic hearing to consider a request from Terra.
Springs, LLC, for a Planned Unit Develo for 22 ousing units, 15,000 - 20,000 square feet of
retail/office space, 340 under ground p ces, landscaped archeological green, perimeter trail
and interpretation area located at 608 Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Notices
were mailed to affected property 0 e lished in the Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
(Resolution)
an appeal of the Planning
aria nee to the rear yard
age with storage above
rict. Notices were mailed to
ay 23, 2003.
g to consider a request from St. Croix
states Phase II, for 14 townhomes
Residential District. Notices were
. water Gazette on May 23, 2003.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continu
1. Possible second reading 0
at the corner of Orleans St
Residential, Multifamily,
2. Receiving of bids an
3. Adoption of findings r
required, 12 feet
a single family
at 122 Lakes"
for Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment for properties located
eeley Street from RA, Single Family Residential to RB, Duplex
ity, RCM
tract for 2003 seal coat project (Resolution)
ase No. V/03-31 for a variance to the front yard setback (30 feet
) and bluff setback (100 feet required, 81 feet requested) for construction of
he RB, Duplex Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland Overlay District
. e. Mat hew McGuire and Andrea Saterbak
NEW BUSINES
1. Reque
2. Pos
signage at 912 West Churchill Street- River Town Restoration
I of resolution to participate in Hazard Mitigation Planning Process
PETITIONS, IN UALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIO IREQUESTS
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT ~
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in
which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
2
~EGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 03-12
Council Chambers, 216 North Fourth Street
June 3, 2003
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Discussion on Fees
STAFF REPORTS
1.Police Chief
2.Fire Chief
3. City Clerk
4. Director of Admin.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of
the meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction
to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed.
5. Community Dev. Director
6. City Engineer/PWD
Discussion, of Street
Lighting R
possible S
Distri
Ar
7. City Attorney
8. City Administrator
Budget Information
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Observance of Flag
CALL TO ORDER
.OLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approval of May
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATI
1. Presentation of retirement plaqu
2. Request to ring church bells - St.
3. Amy Senn, 602 N 5th Stree
4. Request for financial suppo
ENDA TIONS
ttner
Church (Margot Rheinberger)
t or variance to the noise ordinance
ark Elementary School Playground Project
CONSENT AGENDA*
1. Resolution 2003-120, directing payment of bills
2. Resolution 2003-121, approval of Change Order #1 for 2002 sidewalk project (available on Tuesday)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comments for Territorial Prison (Resolution)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. ZAM/03-02. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from Jeff and
. Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi Larson for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot
. from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West
Olive Street. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette
on May 23, 2003.
2. Case No. SUB/03-36. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from Jeff and
Gina Melstrom for the subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet
located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Notices were..
mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
(Resolution if approved)
3. Case No. V103-38. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision on a request from Billy J. Elliot for a variance to the front yard setbacks (corner
lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at 1010 4th
Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were mailed to affected property
owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
4. Case No. V103-41. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning
Commission's decision on a request from David and Jeanne Kensler for a variance to the rear yard
setback (5 feet required, 3' 1" requested) for construction of a two car garage with storage above
located at 1323 2nd Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were mailed to
affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
5. Case No. PUD/03-48. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from St. Croix
Development for a Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase II, for 14 townhomes
(three buildings) located on Parkwood Lane in TH, Townhouse Residential District. Notices were
mailed to affected property owners and published in the StiI'Wa't_~\\~azette on May 23, 2003.
(Resolution)"'
6. Case No. PUD/03-27. This is the date and time for a put;). he ng to consider a request from Terra
Springs, LLC, for a Planned Unit Development for 2 'ho lIQits, 15,000 - 20,000 square feet of
retail/office space, 340 under ground parking spac andsc d archeological green, perimeter trail
and interpretation area located at 608 North Mai CBD, Central Business District. Notices
were mailed to affected property owners and pub' Stillwater Gazette on May 23, 2003.
(Resolution)
n's rdinance Map Amendment for properties located.
Ffrom RA, Single Family Residential to RB, Duplex
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued)
1. Possible second reading of an ordina
at the corner of Orleans Street and Gre
Residential, Multifamily Medium D
2. Receiving of bids and awarding c
3. Adoption of resolution for finding
(30 feet required, 12 feet request
construction of a single fa
Overlay District at 122 Lake
3 seal coat project (Resolution)
Case No. V/03-31 for a variance to the front yard setback
uff setback (100 feet required, 81 feet requested) for
in the RB, Duplex Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland
. atthew McGuire and Andrea Saterbak
NEW BUSINESS
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICA TIONS/REQUESTS
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
*
All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or
citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered .
separately.
2
"
,
v
.
MEMORANDUM
May 30, 2003
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Larry D. Hansen, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Discussion on fees
DISCUSSION:
At their April 29th meeting Council approved new fees. Attached are a few
fees on that schedule that Council may want to revisit and discuss.
.
.
.
.
City of Stillwater
Fees for Services/Publications (Resolution Needed)
.
\
Bed & Breakfast (Needs ordinance revision to charge for inspection)
$250
Copy of Audio Tape of City Council Meetings
LIQUOR & TOBACCO LICENSES: (2003-2004 fees) goes up in 2005
Per year
On-Sale $2650
On-Sale Club $400
On-Sale Sunday $200
Off-Sale $200
On-Sale Wine $275
On-Sale Wine w/Strong Beer $415
On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $140
Off-Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor $55
Tobacco $250
Investigation Fee (new on-sale only & tobacco) $275
$15 per tape
I
I
I Permit to consume $35 (local non-profits no charge)
Temporary Liquor License Fee (12 per year - on-sale)
Temporary Liquor License Fee (3.2 unlimited)
FRANCHISE FEES:
Cable
Gas & Electric
Investigation Fee on All new liquor licenses/tobacco
Annual Renewal Fee - $300
Same
$25 per day
$25 per day
FIRE FEES: (Many will require ordinances)
Tank Removal permits $50
Open Burning permits $10
I Incident reports $5
I Automatic Fire Sprinklers
I Fire Sprinkler Monitoring
I Fire Alarm Sistem (with or without sprinkler monitoring
Above ground storage tank installation (all sizes)
Underground storage tank installation (all sizes)
$75
$25
Same
1.2% - $40.00 minimum
$40
1.2% - $40.00 minimum
$100
$100
. .
High pile storage/smoke removal system - plan review
High pile storage/smoke removal system - inspection
Day care inspection 1 or 2 visits
Day care additional follow up inspections
Lodging House/B & B
Day/foster care inspection (group) - 1 or 2 visits
Day/Foster care inspection (group) - additional inpections
Commercial cooking hood exiting system installation inspection
Commercial cooking hood exiting system installation inspection - additional inspections
Tent, canopy & membrane structure
flammable/combustible liquid spraying or dipping
Hazardous materials plan review inspection
I Natural gas line rupture
I Automobile fire/personal iI\iury accident involving auto extrication
Response to hazardous materials incident - Washington County fire Chiefs Schedule
(Attached)
I Fireworks Sales Permit
Existing Business
Temporary Structure
$50
$25
$50
$25
$50
$75
$25
$65
$25
$40
$75
$75
$100 per hour
$75 to insurance company
.
'~
"
$50.00
I $100.00
.
MemornndUlll
To:
Mayor and City Council
\}~
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer ~
June 3, 2003
From:
Date:
Subject: Proposed Development Charges for Sealcoating
DISCUSSION
A major portion ofthe City's sealcoating efforts are directed towards sealcoating newly
constructed or reconstructed streets. Based on experience we find that within 8 years of the
construction or reconstruction of a street, a sealcoating is warranted.
.
In areas newly constructed there is significant heavy construction traffic and the amount of
wear on the street is usually much greater the first few years. Usually within five years of
the start of the development project about 80% ofthe homes have been completed. This
would be an ideal time to sea1coat. Rather than use general tax dollars to complete this
maintenance, staff suggests that sealcoat be considered part of the developer's responsibility
and part of the intial construction.
As part of the developer's agreement the City of Stillwater could require the developer to
pay a fee to be held in escrow and then used for a sealcoat project once approximately 80%
ofthe homes have been constructed. The fee to the developer would be roughly $2.00 per
lineal foot of street or approximately $100 per house. The exact cost could be determined
based on the proposed plat.
RECOMMENDATION
In order for the Council to put this policy in place the City needs to pass a resolution to
implement the policy requiring developers to pay a sealcoat fee.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with staff recommendation Council should pass a motion enacting a
policy requiring developers who install new public streets to pay a sealcoat fee to the City
of Stillwater.
.
.
]V ~et110ran( Ull1
To:
Mayor and City Council ______
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer ~ ~
May 29,2003
From:
Date:
Subject: Discussion of Street Lighting Repair and Possible Street Lighting District for Industrial
Park Area
DISCUSSION
The entire Industrial Park area has an existing street lighting system throughout. This system is
over 20 years old. It was not a top of the line system when installed originally. Presently it
suffers from almost continuous problems including failures to lights, ballasts and transformers
as well as shorts and failures of the underground wiring system. This range of problems has
resulted in a street light system that currently has failures around the system for a good part of
the year.
.
Since the City is planning to put in a pedestrian trail system along Curve Crest Boulevard, if we
plan to update this lighting system it should be done as part of this pedestrian trail project.
Installing lights after this project was done would not only cost more but it would result in a
second disruption ofthe area.
The challenge of putting new streetlights in is how to pay for them. The commercial properties
through the industrial park certainly benefit from these lights. However the City's has recently
completed a street rehabilitation project on Curve Crest and future projects will certainly occur
on some of the other side streets. These projects have or will result in assessments. An
alternative to assessments would be creation of a street lighting district.
A street lighting district could be implemented throughout the entire industrial park and
marketplace area. This district could be used to pay for future capital improvements and also
capture the maintenance and operational costs. Given the City's difficult budget situation, the
use of a street lighting district in this area and perhaps throughout the entire city could yield
over $20Q,000 a year just for operation of the lighting system.
If the council wishes to go forward on a street lighting district concept a public hearing would
be required. Given that the industrial park area is somewhat unique in its quantity and type of
lighting a separate lighting district for this area would be appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council consider ordering a public hearing to consider a street lighting
district for the industrial park and marketplace area.
.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs with staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion adopting a
resolution ordering a public hearing on a possible street lighting district for the industrial park
marketplace area.
· ~E~ORA~DU~
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
City Administrator Larry Hansen
SUBJECT:
Budget Cuts
DATE:
May 30, 2003
As of this writing the Minnesota House and Senate have approved the bonding bill,
which includes $1,300,000 for the Brown's Creek Initiative and the tax bill which
includes a $745,000 cut in LGA for 2003 and 2004. I have not received news that the
. Governor has signed either bill, but that certainly is the expectation.
While I think we can all be very pleased that the Brown's Creek bonding has apparently
survived, we need to be concerned about the budget deficit for 2003 and 2004 due to the
LGA cuts. The cut in LGA for 2003 is more severe than my worst case scenario. The
cut for 2004 is less severe and allows us to levy back for 60% ofthe cuts in 2004. Ifwe
try to absorb the entire 745,000 in 2003 we will have to keep in place all of the Police
Department cuts and an additional $320,649. This would put us at a level base for 2004
where we would be able to levy back $447,000.'
In struggling with this unpleasant news I have real concern that if we absorb all the cuts
in the remainder of 2003 they will be more severe than our taxpayers will find acceptable.
Possible solutions include:
SoIittinl! the Cut
1. Solittinl! the Cut.
Cutting 'i'2 ofthe remaining $320,649 and using reserve or
budget amendments for the other half. This would mean we would still have
$160,324 to raise to get to a level base for 2004.
.
2.
Franchise Fees.
Create a franchise fee for gas and electric power. This is allowed
l_j
by current statute and could be in effect within approximately 90 days. A number
of cities have already done this and Dave Magnuson has already concluded his
research on the subject. A 3-5% fee would generate an estimated $300-$500,000
plus.
.
3. Lighting District/Special Service Districts.
Currently the City is spending approximately $200,000 per year on street lighting
costs paid for by the general tax levy. A number of cities are charging a "fee" or
special assessment to property owners for street lighting outside ofthe tax levy.
By doing this they are also able to set aside funds to purchase replacement
lighting. This concept has not as yet been fully explored or developed, but has
merit for your consideration.
4. CaoitaI Outlay Bonds - Excess Proceeds.
Every year the City bonds for approximately $1,300,000 for our capital purchases.
This is done outside of our levy limits. Although it would be a circumvention of
the law to purposefully bond for more than we plan to spend, the statutes do allow
the council to change its mind and past bonding can be used for any other public
purpose authorized by law. In short, the council can, by resolution, not purchase
something and use the money in the general fund.
5. Voluntary Leave Without Pay.
Chantell and I have been exploring a leave without pay program to help save .
funds. As envisioned the program would be voluntary, but employees would have
to sign up in advance in order for it to help budget wise. Consideration has been
given to try and make this as painless as possible for all employees at all income
levels. A suggestion of a goal of one voluntary unpaid day off per month may be
affordable. With 100% cooperation this has the potential of saving approximately
$80,000 for 2003 and 160,000 in 2004. Again, details such as union contracts and
the proposals effect on PERA have not been fully worked out.
These are just a few suggestions quickly put together this week as the budget cuts
became more certain. I would like to get councils initial reaction on the same, additional
comments and ideas, and would suggest a council workshop specifically for the budget in
the very near future.
Enclosed is a one page print out highlighting the proposed cuts for Stillwater. Should
you have any questions regarding same please feel free to contact me.
.
.
.
.
FIRE FEES:
TANK REMOVAL PERMITS
OPEN BURNING PERMITS
INCIDENT REPORTS
AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS - PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM - PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION
FIRE SPRINKLER MONITORING
ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION (ALL SIZES)
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INSTALLATION (ALL SIZES)
HIGH PILE STORAGE/SMOKE REMOVAL SYSTEM - PLAN REVIEW
HIGH PILE STORAGE/SMOKE REMOVAL SYSTEM -INSPECTION
FAMILY OR GROUP DAY CARE INSPECTION
DAY CARE ADDITIONAL FOLLOW UP INSPECTIONS
COMMERCIAL HOOD EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM INSTALLATION
COMMERCIAL HOOD SYSTEM INSTALLATION - ADDL INSPECTIONS
TENT, CANOPY & MEMBRANE STRUCTURE
FLAMMABLE/COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID SPRAYING OR DIPPING
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION
EMERG. RESPONSE - GAS LINE RUPTURE
EMERG. RESPONSE - AUTOMOBILE FIRE
EMERG. RESPONSE - AUTOMOBILE EXTRICATION
EMERG. RESPONSE - STRUCTURE FIRE
EMERG. RESPONSE - HAZ-MAT. INCIDENT
LODGING HOUSES/BED & BREAKFAST LICENSE, (ANNUAL INSPECTION)
SCHOOL INSPECTIONS
FIREWORKS SALES
FIREWORKS SALES TEMPORARY
CURRENT PROPOSED
$50 75 *
10 15 *
5 5 *
1.2% - $40 min.
1.2% - $40 min. *
$50 *
$100 *
$100 *
$75 *
$75 *
$50 *
$25 *
$75 *
$45 *
$25 **
$75 **
$75 *
$150 *
$300 **
$300 **
$500 **
Wa. Co. Fee Sch. *
$200 **
1.2 cents/sq. ft.
$100 **
$100 **
* = Current service and can continue
** = Not currently providing service, but possibly could
.matesof aid cuts . .
2003 2003 2003 2003 Total 2003 Remaining Remaining 2004 2004 Total 2004 Remaining Remaining
under May 26, 2003 LGA MVHC LGA cuts MVHC cuts cuts 2003 LGA 2003 MVHC LGA loss MVHC loss loss 2004 LGA 2004 MVHC
compromise certified certified
Cluster Total 586,848,950 85,539,919 122,015.435 20,114,828 142,130,263 464,833,515 65.425,091' 149,7:97,374 20,210,289 170,007,663 437,051,576 65,329,630
ges SLEEPY EYE 1,242,166 117,002 147.471 0 147.471 1,094,695 117,002 147,471 0 147.471 1,094,695 117,002
gsm SOBIESKI 3,173 3,265 775 0 775 2,398 3,265 775 0 775 2,398 3,265
i1sm SOLWAY 7.411 1,037 648 0 648 6,763 1,037 648 0 648 6,763 1,037
gsm SOUTH HAVEN 34,36D lD,4D4 8,458 D 8,458 25,902 10,4D4' 8,458 0 8.458 25,902 10,404
mol SOUTH ST PAUL 3.424,934 544,041 785,079 0 785,079 2,639,855 544,D41 1,181,840 0 1,181,840 2,243,094 544,041
9sb SPICER 139,718 34.480 58,837 0 58,837 80,881 34.480 58,837 0 58,837 80,881 34.480
ges SPRING GROVE 434,218 48.537 52.421 0 52.421 381,797 48,537' 52.421 0 52.421 381,797 48,537
gsm SPRING HILL 4,988 2,914 1,599 0 1,599 3,389 2,914 1,599 0 1,599 3,389 2,914
msm SPRING LAKE PARK 232,337 211,697 232,337 7,817 240,154 0 203,880 232;337 7,817 240,154 0 203,880
msm SPRING PARK 79.440 14,889 51,745 0 51,745 27,695 14,889' 51,745 0 51,745 27;695 14,889
ges SPRING VALLEY 787,165 124,187 139,794 0 139,794 647,371 124,187 139,794 0 139,794 647,371 124,187
ges SPRINGFIELD 769,683 79,111 110,067 0 110,067 659,616 79,111 110,067 0 110,067 659,616 79,111
gsm SQUAW LAKE 9.442 928 1,599 0 1,599 7,843 928' 1,599 0 1,599 7,843 928
gsm ST ANTHONY (STEARNS) 4,932 801 390 0 390 4,542 801 390 0 390 4,542 801
msm ST ANTHONY VILLAGE 198,563 203,525 198,563 68,775 267,338 0 134,750 198,563 68,775 267,338 0 134,750
ghi ST AUGUSTA 178,702 41,186 27,563 0 27.563 151.139 41,186 27,563 0 27,563 151,139 41,186
mhg ST BONIFACIUS 143,656 47,753 72,590 0 72,590 71,066 47,753 72.590 0 72,590 71,066 47.753
qmq ST CHARLES 600.488 68,965 98,871 0 98,871 501,617 68,965 98,871 0 98,871 501,617 68,965
gmg 8T CLAIR 131,023 26,861 14,806 0 14,806 116,217 26,861' 14,806 0 14,806 116,217 26,861
gmj ST CLOUD 12,899,693 1,202,548 2.411,312 0 2.411,312 10.488,381 1,202,548 2,687,660 0 2,687,66D 10,212,033 1,202,548
mhq ST FRANCIS 318,873 133.407 121.419 0 121.419 197,454 133.407 121,419 0 121.419 197.454 133,407
gsm ST HILAIRE 44,837 3,482 7,224 0 7,224 37,613 3,482 ' 7,224 0 7:224 37,613 3,482
ges ST JAMES 1,277,565 88,659 148,646 0 148,646 1,128,919 88,659 148,646 0 148,646 1,128,919 88.659
qmq STJOSEPH 789,884 92,552 126,277 0 126,277 663,607 92,552 197,353 0 197.353 592,531 92.552
gsm STLEO 12,882 1,057 1,171 0 1,171 11,711 1,057 1,171 0 1,171 11,711 1,057
mdv ST LOUIS PARK 2,138,763 898,936 1,550,774 0 1,550,774 587,989 898,936 2,138,763 0 2.138,763 0 898,936
qsm STMARTIN 21,771 8,755 6,936 0 6,936 14,835 8,755 6,936 0 6,936 14,835 8,755
msm STMARY'S POINT 0 7,756' 0 4,290 4,290 0 3,466 ' 0 4,290 4,290 0 3,466
guf ST MICHAEL 145,866 247,997 145,866 138,449 284,315 0 109,548 145,866 138,449 .. 284,315 O. 109;548
msp ST PAUL 76 129.865 4,541.120 13,047,699 0 13,047,699 63,082.166 4,541,120 19,641,697 0 19,64.1,697 56.488;168 4,541.120
msm ST PAUL PARK 571,780 115,784 125:088 0 125,088 446,692 115,784' 192,649 0 192,649 379,131 115,784
.ges ST PETER 2,083,020 167,313 290,963 0 290,963 1,792,057 167,313 393,281 0 393,281 1,689,739 167.313
.~q.sm ST ROSA: 2,976 1.984 1,486 0 1.486 1,490 1,984 1.486 0 1.486 1.490 1,984
ghi ST STEPHEN 76,383 25,547 11,442 11.442 64,941 25,547' 11.442 0 11.442 64,941 25,547
gsm 5T VINCENT 13,868 l,2Q2 977 977 12,891 1,202 977 0 977 12,891 1,202
i1mq STACY. 138,738 12,707 12,513 12,513 126,225 12:707 '12;513 0 12,513 126,225 12.707
gtS STAPLES 1;146,494 58,64,0 112,463 0 112,463 1,034;031 58;640 212,042 212,042 934.452 58:640
ges STARBUCK 341,975 42,379 52,975 0 52,975 289,000 42,379 52,975 52,975 289,000 . 42,379
i-1sm STEEN 18,022 5,080 1.697 O. 1,697 16,325 5,080 1,697 1.697 16.325 5.080
ges STEPHEN 150,951 18,3(0 24,361 0 24,361 126,590 18,370' 24,361 24,361 126,590" 18,370
ges STEWART 192,611 30;319 16,535 0 16,535 176,076 30,319 16,535 lM:J5. 176,076 .30,319
. '..""gmg. STEWARTVILLE,_~c-,-,=o . "'::",,:90J,638~..".J ,11,25.0. ..':'1.61.121 0 16'1,12.1 740,517. 11(250 : 225;223 225,223 676.415 JJ 1..250.
<S..? ,~ )msm STILLWATER 1-,402,487 464.426 745,744, 0745,744 656,743 464.426 '745,7'1-4 '0, ,745,744 656,'743 464.426 ,
J""'-..o-- . .--l
\>gmg'"' STOCKTON' - . '63:289'-'018;373 -0-797149";-:-;--0---'9: 149-"'-54~140' ,'--18;373 . "~~'9;r49--c~" "O-~Q,14907" -'54.,.140;;';-;:18,.313-
gsm STORDEN 90.599 7,886 11,948' 0 11,948 78,651 7,886 11,948 0 11,948 78,651 7,886.
. .gsm STRANOQUIST 14,708 538 1,215' 0 1,21,5 13.493 5.38' 1;215 0 "1,215 13.493 538
gsm STRATHCONA 3,696 . 442 223 223 3.473 442 223 0 223 3.47} 442
qsm 5TURGEONLAKE 13.162 7.477 '4,133 . 4',133 9,029 .7,477 4,133 0 4,133 9,029 7.47.7
gsm SUN BURG 20,951 2,5951 3.484 . 3.484 . 17.467 2,59gi 3,484 0 3.484 17.467 2,595
mhi SUNFISH LAKE 575 1,152 575 1,727 0 575 1,152 1,727 ,0 0
League of Minnesota Cities from House Research estimates L.. Gioi Ci.q 745: ll./L/
C\1'~ Cu. r.s. LOS ;()
1 F .t"1 -. 12.1'\ 3 .2 C' I ~.(-l (!
,.;,
.f-
}
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 03-11
May 20, 2003
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Acting Mayor Milbrandt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Junker, Kriesel, Milbrandt, and Rheinberger
Mayor Kimble None
Also present: City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Community Development Director Russell
Police Chief Dauffenbach
Public Works Director Eckles
Director of Administration Knauss
City Clerk Ward
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Council member Junker to approve the
May 6, 2003 regular meeting minutes with the correction on Page 13,
Communications/Requests relating to Stonebridge request to read: "Motion by
Councilmember Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Junker". All in favor.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
Presentation of retirement olaaues to Maraaret Seim
Acting Mayor Milbrandt and Police Chief Dauffenbach presented Margaret Seim with a
Certificate of Appreciation and plaques commemorating her employment in the
Stillwater Police Department for over 27 years of continuous service.
OPEN FORUM
Ken Carlson, resident of South Hill stated that he was opposed to the closing of Greeley
Street relating to the Trunk Highway 36 plans. He asked Council to keep their promises
as stated in the Council's resolution of July 17, 2001 and promote a slower speed of 45
mph on a parkway boulevard, leaving the Greeley intersection open to Highway 36.
STAFF REPORTS
Community Development Director Russell reviewed information regarding the Veterans
Memorial design changes. He stated it is presented to Council for their information and
~.
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20, 2003 l.:
has been presented to the Heritage Preservation Commission with no particular .
recommendation.
Council member Rheinberger asked about a streetlight on the corner of Brick and
Willard.
Councilmember Kriesel stated that he turned in a petition from the neighbors in the area
approximately two weeks ago.
Public Works Director Eckles stated that he has the petition, however he has not been
able to review the request yet.
City Administrator Hansen stated that he had hoped he would have a good idea on the
issues at the legislature, however things are changing from one day tothe next. He
stated he feels that his original numbers are close. He also stated that Representative
Lipman has introduced a bill to allow two additional liquor licenses for Stillwater.
Public Works Director Eckles updated the Council on the McKusick Ravine project and
addressed concerns regarding the high water level of McKusick Lake. He stated that he
has mailed information packets to the residents around the lake to inform them of the
operations of the new level of the lake. He also stated that included in the packet were
the recommendations of the task force which consisted of McKusick Lake property
owners and others, to have the lake be regulated at a higher level. He stated that the .
department would be working with the homeowners throughout the summer and
experimenting with the water level of the lake.
Council member Kriesel stated that he had met with Perry Furgala a resident on 62nd
Street. He stated that when there is a 4-5" rain it really flows through there. He asked
what Brown's Creek Watershed is doing to resolve this.
Public Works Director Eckles provided a history of the area that drains through that site
which is approximately 300 acres. He stated, even with no development in the area
there are some drainage issues, however, with development coming on-line there would
be a potential for more problems. He stated.that the BCWD has been asked to
investigate possible solutions because the water comes from several communities. He
stated that a letter was sent to the BCWD in February asking them to consider this
problem more strongly and as of this time there has not been a response. He stated
that the Bradshaw holding ponds are not fully operational, but they will handle the runoff
from that development.
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to approve the
consent agenda. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
.
Page 2 of 10
.'
.
.
.
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003
Nays: None
Resolution 2003-111, directing payment of bills
Resolution 2003-112, Resolution Relating to Financing of Certain Proposed Projects to
be Undertaken by the City of Stillwater; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement
Bond Regulations Under the Internal Revenue Code
Resolution 2003-113, approval of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Stillwater and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49
Request for Capital Outlay money for the Parking lot
Request for Capital Outlay money for Bergmann/Stillwater Crossings Park
Request to purchase computer for Police Department
Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License for Church of St. Michael Parish
Festival- June 7, 2003
Application for lawful gambling exempt permit for raffle on September 7, 2003 - St.
Mary's Church
Acceptance of Board of Water Commissioner's Financial Statement for period ending
December 31, 2002
Request for Installation of Banner for Stillwater Art Crawl requested by Art Reach
(5/23/03-6/16/03).
Request for Installation of Banner for Bike Race & Festival requested by Great River
Energy Bike Festival (5/23/03-6/16/03).
Approval of Permit to Sell 3.2 percent malt liquor at Lily Lake Ballfields - Les Novak,
applicant
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. SUB/03-12. This is the date and time for the oublic hearina to consider a reauest
from Twin Cities Habitat for Humanitv. Inc... for a subdivision of one Darcel. Lots 5 and 6. Blk 5.
Holcombe's Ac:f(iitiQn, into two parcel!3 gf 7-~QQ ~quare feet each in the RB. Two Famil'{
Residential District. Notices w~re ~~nt tQ ~ff~cted orooertv owners and oublished in the
Stillwater Gazette on Aoril4. 2003 (continued from the March 18 and Aoril1. 2003 meetina)
Acting Mayor Milbrandt stated that Lakeview Hospital has requested that consideration
of this request be withdrawn.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Reauest for City Grant Match funds (tabled from 5/6/03 meetina)
Community Development Director Russell stated that this request for matching funds for
the architectural survey was tabled from the May 6, 2003 meeting to allow staff to find
out from the Minnesota Historical Society how long the City has to provide the matching
funds. He stated that the historical society would need to know by October 1 , 2003.
Page 3 of 10
/:,'
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20, 2003
\
"
Council member Rheinberger stated that because of the budget issues that this request
should be denied. He also stated that maybe foundations could be contacted for the .
matching funds.
Council member Kriesel stated that he agreed with Council member Rheinberger and
stated that this would be a painless cut.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated that Council could wait and make the decision later
once the cuts to the cities are known.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Council member Kriesel to deny the
request for city grant match for the architectural survey.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: C ouncilmember Milbrandt
Tax Increment Financina District No. 10
City Attorney Magnuson reviewed the resolutions for the establishment of Tax
Increment Financing District No. 10, the decertification of certain parcels in Tax
Increment Financing District No.1 within Development District No.1, and decertification
of Tax Increment Financing District NO.7 within Development District No.1.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember" Junker to adop.
Resolution 2003-114, resolution adopting a modification to the development program'
for Development District No.1, the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District
No. 10 (a redevelopment district) and the establishment of a hazardous substance
subdistrict within Tax Increment Financing District No. 10, and adopting a Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefore reducing the size of Tax Increment Financing
District NO.1 and modification to the Tax increment financing Plan therefore, the
termination of Tax Increment District No.7 within development District No.1, pursuant
to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and
469.174 to 469.179. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: None
Motion by Councilmember Kriesel, seconded by Councilmember Junker to adopt Resolution
2003-115, being a resolution approving the decertifiaction of Tax I ncrement Financing District
No.7, within Development District No.1, of the City of Stillwater. All in favor. .
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: None
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Council member Junker to adopt
Resolution 2003-116, being a resolution approving the decertification of certain parcels fro.
Page 4 of 10
~
.'#
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20, 2003
.
Tax Increment Financing District No.1, within Development District No.1, of the City of
Stillwater. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmkmbers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: N one I
Plannina Commission recommendation on Trunk Hiahwav 36
Communjty Development Director Russell stated that after two years of study with
Mn/DOT,Oak Park Heights Planning Commission and the City's Planning Commission,
they reco:mmend Alignment "F" with bottom hooks. He stated that the Planning
Commission also recommended lowering the elevation of the road to reduce noise,
visual impacts and reducing the speed limit.
Mr. Mike Anderson, 1312 S 4th Street, stated that the South Hill Neighborhood
Association is opposed to the closing of Greeley Street for a freeway on Highway 36.
He requested that Council be consistent with the resolution that was passed on July 17,
2001 and promote a slower speed of 45 mph parkway boulevard leaving the Greeley
intersection open to Highway 36. He stated that if Greeley is closed the quality of living
for all kids and other citizens who live on or near the streets in terms of safety, noise
pollution; and air pollution and will forever harm the South Hill historic neighborhood.
.
,
Eileen Sexton, 10810 Quarry Avenue N, stated she objects to this reversal of decision
and to ask the Council to develop a boulevard in lieu of a freeway. She stated that the
South Hill Neighborhood Association is the result of a community pulling together to
fight for what they most value. She also stated that she believes that it is time for
Stillwater to decide what it is that it most values. She stated that she knows that the
Council is not naive enough to think that a freeway will not dramatically change the
character of Stillwater, but asked if they realized the absurdity of having a freeway be
the gateway to a small historic town along a National Scenic Riverway, both of which
were deemed worthy of preservation by the Federal government of the United States.
She stated that turning Highway 36 into a freeway would result in the exploitation of the
historic town of Stillwater and the St. Croix River Watershed. She requested that
Council act in the interests of your stated values which have been embraced by all
those who chose to call this beautiful place Home and that Council will do the right thing
and vote No to a freeway for Highway 36.
Councilmember Rheinberger stated that he favored alignment F. He also stated that
this would not be the final design, that there would be some fine-tuning of the plan and
more discussion will still occur. He stated that the project should move forward and that
this probess has been going for 18 months.
.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated as a point of clarification that in July of 2001 Council
suppo~ed keeping all three-access points and since that time the task force has met
and had input from professionals, residents, etc and the task force came back with
recommendations. He stated that during the process it was learned that three access
Page 5 of 10
..
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003 ...
points were not possible if we continue to receive federal funding because the distance.
of the access points were to close together.
Council member Junker stated that the plans are concept plans and that there will be
more discussions. He stated that Stillwater and Oak Park Heights Planning
Commissions and Councils would like to see slower speeds as well along a parkway.
He stated no one wants to turn Highway 36 into a high-speed freeway.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated that with the alignment F design it is recommended
with a speed limit of 45 mph.
Council member Kriesel stated that there is a slow speed freeway through Stillwater now
and the only way to get the traffic out of Stillwater is to get Highway 36 upgraded with a
bridge crossing and that the transient traffic is going to follow the path of least
resistance which will be through downtown Stillwater.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Kriesel to accept the
Planning Commission's recommendation for Alignment F. All in favor.
Aooroval of orooosal for condemnation relocation services
City Attorney Magnuson reviewed the proposal for condemnation relocation services.
He also stated that in order to proceed a Quick Take action should begin. He stated .
that even though a Quick Take is initiated does not mean that the City would not
continue to work with the property owner to arrive at a fair and equitable settlement.
Councilmember Rheinberger stated that he was not in favor of the quick take, however
because this is not the final outcome and negotiations with the property owner would
continue he would approve the process.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Kriesel to adopt
Resolution 2003-117, accepting proposal for condemnation relocation services and
Resolution 2003-118, determining the necessity for and authorizing the acquisition of certain
property by proceedings in eminent domain. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: None
NEW BUSINESS
501 S. 2nd Street Demolition Extension reauest (Mr. Castle orooertv)
Community Development Director Russell stated that the demolition of 501 S. 2nd is to
be on May 29, 2003. He also stated that Mr. Castle is requesting that a portion of the
residence be used as a garden shed to be retained if the rest of the home is
.
Page 6 of 10
.'
.
.
.
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003
demolished, which would require Council approval and an extension of time. He stated
that the Building Official would consider the extension for no more than a month.
I
I
Mr. Bradl~y Castle, owner, requested that Council grant an extension to allow him
additional time to find a builder to restore his home. He stated that he has placed an ad
in the local Gazette. He stated that he has received a letter from Mr. Mac McCalla a
structural: engineer stating that the house is repairable.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker extending the
demolition of 501 S 2nd Street to July 1, 2003. All in favor
Plannina Commission reauest to rezone Old Athletic Field and Javcee Ballfields to open space
Community Development Director stated that the Planning Commission has requested
that Council consider the rezoning of the Old Athletic Field and Jaycee Ballfields to
open space. He stated that the concerns that the Planning and Parks have is the
conversion of the properties for private development. He stated the commission wants
to raise awareness of this issue. He also stated that a new zoning district would have to
be created to do this, however he believes that there could be some legal issues.
City Attorney Magnuson provided the history of the district acquiring the Old Athletic
field and that zoning power could not be used to achieve an objective of this nature.
Mr. Robert Hagstrom stated that there are three committees looking at the school
district properties and that no recommendation has gone before the School Board. He
also stated that they would be meeting on June 3. He stated that discussions between
the school district, Valley Athletic Association and the cities might provide a workable
solution.
No action was taken.
Possible final olat aooroval for Libertv Villaae - Contractors Prooertv Development Company
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the final plat request from Contractors
Property Development Company.
Motion by Council member Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to adopt
Resolution 2003-119, approving final plat for Liberty Village Commercial (Case No. SUB/F03-
52). All in favor.
Ayes: Council members Kriesel, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, and Junker
Nays: None
Chanae of November 4.2003 City Council meetina date
Page 7 of 10
'.
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003 ';
City Clerk Ward stated that Washington County will be administering the School District
Elections this year and that as part of the agreement the county has stipulated that all polling .
places will be open and that all costs for the election will be paid for by the School District.
She stated that City Hall will be a polling place on November and requested that Council
change their meeting date.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker setting Tuesday,
October 28, 2003 replacing the meeting on November 4, 2003 due to the School District
Elections. All in favor.
COMMUNICA TIONS/REQUESTS
Reauest to use sandwich boards for Art Crawl
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the request for the use of sandwich
boards for the Art Crawl.
Councilmember Junker explained that the sandwich boards direct people to the
individual shops hosting artists and their work.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to approve the
use of sandwich boards for the Art Crawl. All in favor.
Reauest for outside sales - Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce
.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the request for outside sales by the
chamber of commerce in conjunction with Music on the Waterfront and Movies in the
Park. He stated that the location would be the north side of the Lumber Barons Hotel.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to approve the
outside sales for the chamber of commerce. All in favor.
Reauest for financial SUDDort for Oak Par~ E:it1m~ntarv School Plavaround Proiect
Michael Coppock, 731 W. Orleans requested that Council table the meeting until June
3, 2003 so that there is a full Council including the Mayor.
Council member Rheinberger stated that even though it is a worthwhile project, he would
not be in favor of financially supporting this project because of the budget constraints
that will be affecting the City and that the school district should be financially
responsible for this project. He suggested that private money from foundations be
solicited to help with this project.
Councilmember Kriesel stated he appreciated the effort of the people to bring
playground equipment to any school. He stated that the proposal should be brought to
the school board and that with the budget problems he does not see how the City coul.
Page 8 of 10
y'
.
.
.
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003
afford it. He also stated that other schools need playground equipment and would like
to see the schools together come up with a priority plan for these playgrounds. He
stated that he could see other schools coming to the City for money and it would nofbe
feasible fpr the City to support all the schools in Stillwater. He stated that Council would
help get the word out and if public works has the ability and time to assist that could be
done.
Councilm~mber Junker also commended the group.
Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Kriesel to table this request
until the June 3,2003 meeting.
Ayes: Councilmembers Kriesel, Milbrandt, and Junker
Nays: Council member Rheinberger
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
Councilmember Kriesel asked about the lift station sod at Maryknoll and Oakridge and
requested someone look at the installation.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated that the holiday lights installation has been partnered
with the Lumberjack Days Association.
Councilmember Junker commended the Chamber on the plantings of the flowerpots in
downtown, they look tremendous.
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
Police Chief Dauffenbach reminded Council of the retirement get-together for Margie
Seim in the Training Room, on Monday, June 2, 2003 from 2 - 4:30 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Junker to adjourn at
8:38 p.m. All in favor.
Wally C. Milbrandt, Acting Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
Resolution 2003-111, directing payment of bills
Page 9 of 10
City Council Meeting - 03-11
May 20,2003
\
Resolution 2003-112, Resolution Relating to Financing of Certain Proposed Projects to..
be Undertaken by the City of Stillwater; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement
Bond Regulations Under the Internal Revenue Code
Resolution 2003-113, approval of Memorandum of Understanding between the City of
Stillwater and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49
Resolution 2003-114, resolution adopting a modification to the development program
for Development District No.1, the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District
No. 10 (a redevelopment district) and the establishment of a hazardous substance
subdistrict within Tax Increment Financing District No.1 0, and adopting a Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefore reducing the size of Tax Increment Financing
District NO.1 and modification to the Tax increment financing Plan therefore, the
termination of Tax Increment District No.7 within development District No.1, pursuant
to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.124 to 469.134 and
469.174 to469.179
Resolution 2003-115, being a resolution approving the decertification of Tax Increment
Financing District No.7, within Development District No.1, of the City of Stillwater
Resolution 2003-116, being a resolution approving the decertification of certain parcels
from Tax Increment Financing District No.1, within Development District No.1, of the
City of Stillwater
Resolution 2003-117, accepting proposal for condemnation relocation services
Resolution 2003-118, determining the necessity for and authorizing the acquisition of
certain property by proceedings in eminent domain
Resolution 2003-119, approving final plat for Liberty Village Commercial (Case No. .
SUB/F03-52)
.
Page 10 of 10
City O~
g tiQQwate/l, uUltHlegota
Ce/lti~lcate o~ cApp/leclatio"
ptr.ege"ted to
EARL PLAT T1\J!1liR
WHEREAS, EARL PLA TrNER, Will RETIRE FROM ~n {
EMPLOYMENT, Et't't.tillVE JULY 1,2003.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE \.in { COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF STIllWATER, MINNESOTA, THAT FOR HIS DEDICATED
SERVICE TO THE \;H { OF S.lllWA TEll, EARL. PLAIt NER IS HEREBY
COMMENDED; THAT RECOGNITION BE aHfEN TO THE FACT EARL
PLA TINER HAS SERVED THE \Jut FAITHFULLY, Et'tlCIENTL Y' AND
. COURTEOUSLY FOR OVER TWENTY FOUR YEARS OF CONTINUOUS
SERVICE. THE COUNCIL REGRETS THAT HE IS RETIRING FROM CITY
EMPLOYMENT, BUT EXTENDS TO HIM IT'S APPRECIATION FOR HIS
DEDICATED SERVICE.
BE IT FUTBER RESOLVED, THAT THE ern' CLERK IS HEREBY
AlITHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO ~lt.R THIS CERTIFICATE OF
APPRECIATION UPON THE Ot't/lCIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS OF
THE COUNCIL AND TO DEUVER A CERTIFJlJ!ID COpy THEREOF TO
EARL PLA TINER.
ADOPTED BY THE crrr COUNCil THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2003.
uUayolr
.
.
.
Marguerite (Margot) Rheinberger
818 West Olive Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 439-4199
May 28, 2003
Larry Hansen
City Administrator
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Hansen,
On behalfofSt. Michael's Catholic Church I am asking the City Council to support
St. Michael's desire to ring its church bells to serenade the people who have gathered in
various venues in Stillwater to view our wonderful fireworks display on Friday, July 4th.
St. Michael's is celebrating its 150th birthday this year and we would like to pay tribute to
America's 22ih birthday by playing "Happy Birthday," and a variety of patriotic songs.
I spoke with Dave Eckberg, president of St. Croix Events, and asked him what time he
would suggest that the bells ring. Dave, who was extremely supportive and enthusiastic
about the idea, suggested we play until 9:55 p.m. The proposed 30-minute serenade
would then begin at 9:25 p.m.
I am sure that the many people who gather to watch at the Historic Courthouse and near
the Broadway Street lookout will hear the bells but to my pleasant surprise Dave even felt
those gathered in Lowell Park would as well. Please let me know if you have any
questions regarding this request. Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Marguerite (Margot) Rheinberger
Sesquicentennial Committee Member
Church of St. Michael's, Stillwater
-'
)
.
MEMORANDUM
May 27, 2003
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Noise Variance Request
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a request from Ms. Amy Senn to the noise variance for Saturday,
July 26 during Lumberjack Days. Ms. Senn had a similar request last year (see
attached minutes) and is requesting the same for this year.
ACTION REQUIRED:
.
Discuss request and approve or deny request.
.
'\..
SENN & ASSOCIATES
\
Attorneys and Counselors o/Law
Amy L. Senn
First Bank Building
nOO-80th Street South
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
Telephone: 612/459-0955
Facsimile: 612/458-9930
-~,,~
~-
Of Counsel:
.
Jason Frederick Rudie.
Forrest M. Anderson
OS/21/02
Mayor Kimble and Councilmernbers
City of Stillwater
ATTN: DIANE WARD
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Amy L Senn - 602 North 5th Street
Request for variance to noise ordinance
Dear Mayor Kimble and Councilmernbers:
I would like the opportunity to address the City Council at their next regular meeting to request a variance to .
the noise ordinance. As you may recall, last year I held a gathering at my home on the last Saturday in July
and with the council's approval a Jive band played until midnight. I would like to hold an event at my home
again this year on Saturday, July 26th during Lumberjack Days. I am hoping to receive a variance to the noise
ordinance so that I could again have live music until midnight. My neighbors are aware and would be invited
to attend the party.
. e and consideration.
.
· Admitted to practice in Minnesota and Wisconsin
rI
ij
.
.
.
CITY OF STillWATER
CITY COUNCil MEETING NO. 02-12
June 18, 2002
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Mayor Kimble called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
None
Also present: City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Public Works Director Eckles
Fire Chief Kallestad
City Clerk Ward
Director of Administration Knauss
Assistant Finance Director Harrison
Press:
Julie Kink, Courier
PLEDGE OF AllEGIANCE
In honor of Flag Day Councilmember Bealka lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to approve the
June 4, 2002 regular minutes. All in favor.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
Amv Senn. 602 N 5th Street - Reauest for variance to the noise ordinance
Ms. Amy Senn reviewed her request to hold a gathering at her home on Saturday, July
27, 2002. She stated that there would be a live band and she would like to have the
band play until midnight. Sbe also stated that the neighbors are aware and invited to
the party.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka' approving a
variance to the noise ordinance, for the band, with the condition that the band quits playing at
midnight and that the variance is only granted for this year. All in favor.
Tom Kooo. Larson Allen Weishair and Co.. LLP - Citv Financial Statement
Mr. Tom Koop provided an overviewofthe City financial statement. He also reviewed
graphs for various funds showing expenditures and revenues, operating levy and debt.
levy; capital outlay and construction-governmental funds, total next tax capacity and
legal debt margin. He commended M~. Harrison and the Finance Department for their
/'
,
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
May 27, 2003
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Noise Variance Request
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a request from Ms. Amy Senn to the noise variance for Saturday,
July 26 during Lumberjack Days. Ms. Senn had a similar request last year (see
attached minutes) and is requesting the same for this year.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Discuss request and approve or deny request.
,,-.
SENN & ASSOCIATES
"
Attorneys and Counselors o/Law
Amy L. Senn
First Bank Building
nOO-8Oth Street South
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
Telephone: 612/459-0955
Facsimile: 612/458-9930
~,~
~.
Of Counsel:
.
Jason Frederick Rudie.
Forrest M. Anderson
OS/21/02
Mayor Kimble and Councilmembers
City of Stillwater
ATTN: DIANE WARD
216 N 4lh Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Amy L. Senn - 602 North 5th Street
Request for variance to noise ordinance
Dear Mayor Kimble and Councilmembers:
I would like the opportunity to address the City Council at their next regular meeting to request a variance to.
the noise ordinance. As you may recall, last year I held a gathering at my home on the last Saturday in July
and with the council's approval a jive band played until midnight. I would like to hold an event at my home
again this year on Saturday, July 26th during Lumberjack Days. I am hoping to receive a variance to the noise
ordinance so that I could again have live music until midnight. My neighbors are aware and would be invited
to attend the party.
. e and consideration.
.
· Admitted to practice in Minnesota and Wisconsin
"
.
.
.
CITY OF STilLWATER
CITY COUNCil MEETING NO. 02-12
June 18, 2002
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Mayor Kimble called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
None
Also present: City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Public Works Director Eckles
Fire Chief Kallestad
City Clerk Ward
Director of Administration Knauss
Assistant Finance Director Harrison
Press:
Julie Kink, Courier
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
In honor of Flag Day Councilmember Bealka lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to approve the
June 4, 2002 regular minutes. All in favor.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
Amv Senn. 602 N 5th Street - Reauest for variance to the noise ordinance
Ms. Amy Senn reviewed her request to hold a gathering at her home on Saturday, July
27,2002. She stated that there would be a live band and she would like to have the
band play until midnight. She also stated that the neighbors are aware and invited to
the party.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka approving a
variance to the noise ordinance, for the band, with the condition that the band quits playing at
midnight and that the variance is only granted for this year. All in favor.
Tom Kooo. Larson Allen Weishair and Co.. LLP - Citv Financial Statement
Mr. Tom Koop provided an overview ofthe City financial statement. He also reviewed
graphs for various funds showing expenditures and revenues, operating levy and debt
levy; capital outlay and construction-governmental funds, total next tax capacity and
legal debt margin. He commended Ms. Harrison and the Finance Department for their
.~
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council V
Steve Russell, Community Development Directo
April 30, 2003
Oak Park Elementary School Request for Support to Replace School
Playgrounds
The Parks Board heard a request from Oak Park Elementary PTA Playground Committee
at their meeting of April 28, 2003. Several committee members spoke to the need for
the project and requested city financial or in-kind service support for the project.
The Parks Board supported the concepf of replacing the existing, outdated playground
but felt that with the recent city investment in the Old Athletic Field playground
equipment ($50,000), the city budget situation and the lack of school district financial
participation, no city funds be provided for this excellent project.
. Attached in the information received by the Parks Board.
Recommendation: No city funding but consideration of in-kind service support if
resources in Public Works/Parks Department is available.
Attachments: Handout, Oak Park Elementary School Playground Project.
.
..
.. i
II
.~.IiIU..I_JI;Ill~oiIIlMWUlII.loiIA!J/Illj.iW_IJiIt.O:I.la~b~ ....~li:l~~.l.lIIlJlti.oildi.ii~U&iiAIlllWlU..iIIoIj'Wililtl."'loiiIMljlll.blW*il~_~...I.ilIII'.LI.I~""\IIoJ.iiAiLAili~lkj,Mil.11JI~11&lili&1J.j.....
II
.
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Wednesday, April 16, 2003
Stillwater Park and Recreation Board
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Park and Recreation Board Members:
Oak Park Elementary PTA Playground Committee is a non-profit group committed to raising
$85,000 for the purchase and installation of desperately needed playground equipment. At
Oak Park Elementary School, over 500 children from Stillwater, Oak Park Heights, and
Bay town Township regularly play on a playground which is old and worn out. After a
recent physical inspection, much of the existing playground equipment was determined
to be non-compliant with the guidelines of the American Society of Testing and
Consumer Product Safety Commission. It also doesn't meet ADA accessibility
requirements, restricting its use by children with special needs. The high cost of maintaining
this playground equipment makes preserving it impractical. Ultimately, the inspectors .
recommended replacing it.
The timing couldn't be worse. Stillwater Area Schools fully supports this project, however,
no district funds are available to purchase playground equipment, and none are expected in
the foreseeable future. In response, we are seeking funds from a variety of sources,
tapping into you who share our interest in the safety, health, and recreational
opportunities for children in these communities.
Enclosed, for your review, is the project summary, budget, funding strategy, design team
narrative, existing equipment removal plan and new site layout, along with other supporting
materials. Your financial support will provide the children and families who use this
playground with a place that offers challenge as well as a chance to develop. It would be
greatly appreciated. Donations, made payable to Oak Park PT A Playground Fund, are
being accepted at US Bank, Oak Ridge Branch, 6001 Stillwater Blvd. N., Stillwater,:MN
55082 Please contact me if you have any questions at (651)351-8606. Thank. you for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
~~ . f(~"tt-. o-t~~
Sheila Eller, Oak Park Elementary School Princip
and Oak Park PT A Playground Committee
Enclosures
~.I.,~,.I~~I".h"..I..r........!~L<..l.'''''" ',,"",'.;.ili>~"''''''''L1~~loMJ.~,ojlLiJlI.hiIJi~'''''~_hij.li<lW~.'''U~W!tlA~'J:lttS..Iltlk''''''J... "''''''''''All'lut l'IW~iiIJ~,,",I.l!&U''''I.'CIl''~WIO.bbIll''ll'IlIIW'~ill:'~Uili 'lJlIl".;.<l~.:IJlUHjil.LI<H 'iH~~',;.Ii>U!I"'I.I.jJ1 J..uj,..J1.",!ll~ UlIlIiJ..illll ",~I_ ...""-.....,.;.ooi.l<li!:~~i~
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater,:MN 55082
.
.
.
.
II
II
'Oak"'Park'''Eie~meiiiary''~S~cii-ooi'
Playground Project
Attachment A
Project Summary
POPULATIONS CONCERNED
Oak Park Elementary School is located in a primarily residential neighborhood, bordered by
the cities of Stillwater and Oak. Park Heights. The school's playground serves approximately
500 children during each school day, and an average of 125 more children during the before-
and after-school care programs. These children are residents of Stillwater, Oak. Park Heights,
and Bay town Township. Families from the neighborhood use the playground as a gathering
place, too, including grandparents who enjoy having a play place for visiting grandchildren
within walking distance of their home. Additionally, up to 500 children and youth participate
in sports programs at the school's adjacent athletic fields and the playground serves as a play
place for siblings to be entertained during brother or sister's practice or game nearby. The
Oak Park playground is an important facility to both the school and community, and is often
in use for up to twelve hours per day, year round.
DESIRED OUTCOMES:
I.Promote Chlldrens' Safety
Oak Park Elementary has already taken steps to improve the safety of children in their
classrooms and as they arrive and leave the school. Now we want to extend the progress to
the playground. Our goal is to upgrade the safety and quality of childrens' play by removing
the aged equipment prior to installing the new structure. After a recent physical inspection,
much of the existing playground equipment was determined to be non-compliant with the
guidelines of the American Society of Testing and Consumer Product Safety Commission.
The high cost of maintaining this playground equipment makes preserving it impractical.
Ultimately, the inspectors recommended replacing it.
-The proposed new design is age-appropriate and sized to adequately accommodate the
number of chlldren at the school, while also providing equipment and surface materials
that com".,,", to current safety standards.
~1iiI""A~~d8,i.I!i/~\,"doo.wol\lir.~iI;.,~~I"''o.!l.IlII.lj,~~~oWIi.luiIl.~J~;.,!f,.jIlWA*,.I~l_'''U'''''16llllLiill8.1~1Jlu.&.ll!UILII""""''''''"''''J'"''''.alo. ~..I,I W~~'''''~I~w.iilll1oW1J1ft~wlll.;atlllllJWJ.l..g).II.:.jjj;.ili.di:LiiIJJRl!l.i~t<I~~I~.....Llt:iiwlJ~.&<.r.IIJ~ ltt"U&t1,l~I'~~iitlUl..JlI..m'i~~Jo!':"'~
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
II
i.l~.~lM~~~~""IUIIi~~~"I,I""~I.~~~.III"""JLJwluJ.A.I.oJ~~&bjl~~~1
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
,-
.
ProJect Snmwary (continued)
2. Promote Childrens' Health and Recreation
In addition to our childrens' safety, we are concerned about their health. It has been widely
reported that young people in this country are less active and more overweight than anytime
in recent history. It is vital that we offer an exciting play place to encourage our children to
play actively. The current playground pieces at Oak. Park Elementary School are sorely
lacking in both exciting play and well-rounded fitness.
-The proposed new design encourages children to climb, crawl, slide, balance, hang,
and stretch in an environment which otTers challenge as well as a chance to develop. It
will provide an engaging outlet for their energies and creativity.
3. Promote Inclusion for All Children
Our current playground doesn't meet ADA accessibility requirements, restricting its use by .
children with special needs. The equipment and the.underlying surface are out of .
compliance.
-The proposed new design includes a concrete sidewalk/ramp and an engineered wood
fiber surface to encourage play by children of all abilities.
4. Promote Strong Communities
Playgrounds bring communities together by providing an attractive atmosphere for
neighborhood and family gatherings. Building a safe and exciting playground at Oak. Park
Elementary School would be an asset to the neighborhood. It would p~vv'ide the children and
families who use this play space with a similar experience to those who use the safe and
modem play areas at the other schools in the district, as well as in the city parks.
-The proposed new design creates a safe, accessible, fitness-promoting, imagination-
enhancing, and friendship-forging recreational area for the families in our
communities.
.a:.ii,.Ik.~.'......u.:.o..1 ,L<I.~I~ a.:aJ.a.l,.'ii4<..llWI~ltiil.OlllllllkJll;yJ~IiW.iII'l~IIJ.\ildJW ~'.Ii~WUli.IJlII.~"L..liI1o'l..:WI~tj..tl~lI.iIJ"tJIlIIUlIlL.io!I!otl!~.'ii.:llII~.J.lWJ.lI~l,ojI"cAiY~UIIII~'IIlIllJLI6'Hbl.IUl~":t!..:IlI:lllIIWI'lI.lJm'.l''''IUl''~.:JIIII:zlUII,l'IlIiltLIamlroiMlt::l'~IIl~AIiIow...ulo'll.ldllJ
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
.
.
.
.
II
-
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
'project SlJ.mJl1ary (continued)
SITUATION
The timing of this critically needed playground upgrade couldn't be worse. Stillwater Area
Schools fully supports this project, however, no district funds are currently available to
purchase playground equipment, and none are expected in the foreseeable future. In
response, we are seeking funds from a variety of sources, tapping into those who share our
interest in the safety, health, and recreational opportunities for children.
FUNDING STRATEGY
We are approaching this project in a fiscally responsible way. All labor and time required to
design the playground and raise the needed funds comes from volunteers. We are fortunate to
have supportive individuals who have generously provided organizational,architectural,
grant writing, and other professional skills, at no charge. Materials, such as postage,
stationery, printing, and aerial photography, have also been donated. Parents, grandparents,
and other community members will volunteer their labor for the actual installation of the
playground equipment, saving an estimated $10,000 towards the overall cost. We have kept
the project expenses to a bare minimum and hope to achieve our goal of installing the new
playground equipment during the Fall of 2003.
The cost of this project is $85,000. Oak Park Elementary PTA has organized a multi-faceted
fundraising effort to build an exciting and safe playground for the children. We are seeking
funds from a variety of sources, tapping into those who share our interest in the safety,
health, and recreational opportunities for children in this community. Oak Park Elementary
parents, students, and staff are leading the fundraising effort through direct donation, sales,
and the production of community events. We hope to also gain fmancial and in-kind support
from the cities of Oak: Park Heights and Stillwater, local residents, businesses, corporations,
and foundations, through personal appeal, direct mail, and grant requests. This isa widely-
used community playground and fmancial support will provide the children and families who
use this playground with a place that offers challenge as well as a chance to develop, in an
aesthetically pleasing environment
..~i~i6.b!Uii.i'wIiII~~!I.i.ii~illWlli.ih;Yllt.l!.lllf.iiolod.lMlIiNll.~~~l:IIIIl.~~Iiff.lIJM~il8IlIliKj'iJlll.iIoll,lIili.llalilll.JIiL~lW1y,jjjU"~:!IlIIJljlolMUl4.ll..-uiLd.:UlIIc~i.IEUI1~IW!&~i!li.lJliiiiiUui~iW!!i.U.:/i~WllI:WI~idllllliiiU_.:Jd""J"illllJdiu~l.Iill4&~II:lIll......,Iilt.i;ljjUt.ldaualiIi~lda:d!t,~..iilllllillill
Oak Park ElementarySchoolt 6355 Osman Ave. N.t Stillwatert MN55082
II
II
.
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Attachment B
projected Budget Overview
The total estimated cost of the project, including preparation of groundst purchase of
equipment and surfacingt and installation will be $85tOOO. The breakdown of anticipated
expenses and income are outlined below.
ESIIl\1AJ ....U EY.f4.;NSES
Removal of some existing equIpment
and footings
Stockpile sandt removal of 12tt depth soil
off site (250 cu. yd.), replace sand for
drainage below future lOtt depth wood fibers
Footings 3t depth:
Concrete material (w/volunteer labor)
Bobcat w/Auger rental (w/volunteer labor)
Concrete sidewalk/ramp (contract)
for accessibility
Play Structure Equipment
Engineered wood fiberst perimetert
drain tile
Certified installer supervisor for
volunteers @ $500/day
Landscaping
Total Expenses
$750
$2~
.
$ltOOO
$1 t250
$ltOOO
$67tOOO
$lOtOOO
$1~
$0
$85,000
"",,";I!Iitl~u.""'~I.i.A..~~.I"~<IlI.:l..ol.I.I.:4lj,:u.wj.IiII~..wil;l,ti.uilllJ~ta.i.IIIliYilU.llilllJ:lj~iUU.!i6J!J'I....~jlilil*l!ll>iI~.ilJi~IL1oIa.it.II~!.liliRIl~"'illI:.I.IlIl~I.IlUil'JI!I~i~JjllotlolUi..bIJ!IIIidJl....hftllilill.!ll.l..t.JIliI&lla!!llitkl~&iijjI\ioJiII.~lI!11.l'ldllSlu~lliill!oIiIlllillll..II!Ii:t.!.:I.I_lu,iMlIIj.llWiil ~lw..'lllil~~ '.'.,wJ
.
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
.
.
.
II
II
1IIi.llr.iI...L.lli..~I"'";.~;J....i,,j~IIi.l~_~iJ~jlWd~~I.I.i.~'I~.IioI'IiI.ll~I.IIiI~Il&law~'~~l!ii1will~~1iI.IIlil/j,~.u&I'
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Attachment C
In-kind Su,!>port
We are approaching this project in a fiscally responsible way. Our greatest cost-saving
strategy is to operate with a predominantly volunteer staff. The majority of labor and skills
needed to plan and implement this project have been or will be provided by those who are
willing to donate time. Individual Oak Park School parents have provided architectural skill
support, aerial photography, writing for numerous grant applications, publicity, copy service,
etc. Many of the incidental materials (stamps, paper supplies, etc.) have also been provided,
as needed. Furthennore, parents, grandparents, and other community members will volunteer
their labor for the actual installation of the playground equipment This saves an estimated
$10,000 towards the overall cost. Although we have not tallied the dollar amount of the in-
kind support from the volunteers, we know our costs are considerably lower due to the
generosity of people who are committed to serving children's needs.
Proiected Funding Income
The resources needed to complete this project will be raised through a variety of sources,
tapping into those who share our interest in the safety, health, and recreational opportunities
for children in this area. Oak Park Elementary parents, students, and staff are leading the
fundraising effort through direct donation, sales, and the production of community events.
Our big fundraising event takes place in May, and our Oak Park School family donations
campaign begins in late April. We hope to also gain financial and in-kind support from the
cities of Oak Park Heights and Stillwater, Bay town Township, local residents; businesses,
corporations, and foundations through personal appeal, direct mail, and grant requests.
SOURCE ~oa. Received To-date
School Fundraising Events $20,000 $2,500
Individual Contributions $20,000 $3,220
Foundation Grants $20,000 Submitted
Area Businesses/Corporations $5,000 In process
Municipal Contributions $20,000 Submitted
Total Income $85,000 $5,720
.~!I.~~J...Il!!I.l.;:r.w,.MlI~~Iial>~:w';iI,IItr..~~liIt~"..~lliIli,.wJ~kidt~;';jkU.,.a.'i~i!all.lOfJ~W!MIA~~.a.t~~iljIj,:.~"'iJti.tj~ItW~iIl~ Ill!l;iliil.llWtiJI. 'ilL:I~lo1l.Ql,l~to6l.~,;t.illiw.\~~~ldu,i\iLllJ.iIII.iliM~~1'.lIJ~11Iii.ij,j1l.l!l""',WlI.oloiAiI~~;iI~Idi~~1.,~i.bki.li.ii'~I~lIilio1t.,;JI!i1dllli~I.l,_~, mw!
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
II
"""iIiilili,loll~lIIolo,"'~Y""'I.""ilolli__loI'l...iIiIi",I~~I_"l ,1ai1..~..~IUoIo....lIIl1oWI"",i~.~IoIIiIIii:OItIIliOl:Mll.~"'*,*
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
II
.
Attachment D
Design Committee Narrative
January 2O(B
Site Conditions
The Design Committee obtained an aerial photo of the existing site at a scale of 1 inch = 50
feet from Washington County. This photo shows the site in plan view, overlaid with
drawings of contours, (showing drainage). This photo also shows the existing ball field with
the adjoining playground areas on the upper plateau. The existing playground areas were
planned and installed along and outside of the first and third baselines of the ball field. The
eastern playground areas, (1st base line), are immediately bordered on the east by a 14' drop
in elevation (over a 28' distance). The southern playground areas, (3rd base line) are
immediately bordered on the south by 63rd Street North.
The existing ball field is supervised and used during school hours for kickball and as an open
play space. However, District #834 Community Education schedules this field for softball .
during spring and summer after school and on weekends, when the area is not supervised. In
the playground safety inspection report, it was noted that the existing playground areas were
in close proximity to the existing ball field. Since any new playground design could affect
the existing ball field, Community Education was contacted. They requested that the ball
field remain; however, limiting the scheduling of the ball field to younger grades was
discussed. The closest point of the existing school is appn.lximately 200' from home plate.
Existing Equipment
The Design Committee then focused on identifying which existing play equipment was to
remain and which was to be removed. It was decided that although all the equipment without
surfacing would be removed, the southern playground areas with compliant depth surfacing
(sand) would remain and be monitored for maintenance and safety issues. If removed, new
equipment and surfacing would not be provided in this area because of the close proxiniity to
the street and the potential need for fencing. There were safety issues involving the existing
east playground equipment, and this area was a potential new playground location.
Therefore, it was decided that the majority of the east playground would be removed, with
the exception of the swings and the plastic slide. If the east swings were J.\;Ol.Uoved, new
equipment would not be provided in that area because of the proximity of the ball field,
(within 100' radius). Swings also require the largest amount of area in a new playground.
The plastic slide is relatively new and will be included in the design area of the new
playground. It was also decided that the existing surfacing (sand) at the east playground
should be stockpiled while 12" of soil was removed offsite for the new playground area. The
sand would be replaced for drainage under the planned 10" depth wood fiber accessible
surfacing, which would then be level with the adjacent ground elevation. Drain tile would be
installed along the north, west and south perimeter of the new playground.
..JjJ~-..d!/j,,:!iI!"'lliJlil~"IcIWliLI'.IJo""ltJj.ltdUJiJi!:!iJ.d.! u.II...."'.. i'.~ltilll*l~,illWIl1i.J'~I6U,,"!i1I1:~~.l.lI'''''''' '..u...u~~..~~ 1ll..JI~WJ,J,UI~{hlllJlo l.!..CjjllW.l.IL~lidi,.!L:&I&.i~I~u;!WUl!llm.lUi<Llillola!lWU;I&!WI...w.Lt<II"lIIUhLllJlU.~""'liIlllJ.lllj.OIlIl~lll~lnu...~I.IIIl"'''l&iL.ALl~lUIIIIl1ioioMllLllUl.U,lIIiML~ililI!4iGll.~'
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
.
.
.
.
II
II
oi.l~I.:..w~,~ilij~'\~"I~lli.li!ll;il.l.iM!..'6l.J.h.l~Ja"~~ill"'..~!.iO;yUj~'IIL'!,~i\;i\lil.~IiuIll.l~1~iil!liI"0IIJ~Jl;~lIIi1l11.1!~i"lIiaI""1l1ill~AjiSi.t.I'IUiJ,I~!I~~IIMa.ld.i!Ili~IIi:'lilIllll.tlll.olk!JIlI8.1i1:.o1~
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Design Committee Narrativ~ (continued)
January 2003
Location
The Design Committee then reviewed options for the location of the new playground. The
existing school is not air-conditioned and operable windows are used. Therefore, noise is a
concern to the teachers and classrooms in session when other classes are using the
playground. Retention of the existing open space was requested. Provision of different areas
for younger and older students was also requested. For safety issues, a location away from
the street and closer to supervision was recommended. For the new playground to be
accessible, provision of a compliant route from the existing building was required. The
Design Committee decided to request that Community Education limit the scheduling of the
ball field to younger grades, (hitting less than 100' distance), in lieu of providing a fence.
Therefore, preliminary drawings locate the new playground outside the 100' radius of the ball
field and outside of the continuation of the 1st base line to the 150' radius, and again
bordered on the east by the existing 14' drop in elevation. The drawings also show the new
location approximately 140' east of the existing 2-story wing of the school, retaining the
existing open field. Although part of the proposed location is within 75' of the I-story wing
of the school (noise concern), the majority of the 75' feet is an existing paved area currently
used as a play area. Accessibility to the new playground will be via this existing paved area
and a new concrete sidewalk/ramp. New benches for supervision are shown between existing
trees at the north side of the new location. The playground dimensions shown on the
drawings are not representative of the size of the playground. These dimensions only
represent parameters for planning purposes.
..""'''''.......~I''..... ...1.__ ..~.",' ~,.....""u.....\i"_.u...., ...IU.IIO.J.J..... ..'........>IJ:\........_... >-"......I~l"'~I.JIola,!~LU"" -a...u... ' UI.b,,,w, jjw........j.I.UIlI,""~~s.thl.lW~:lJ.,JOIJII~_'~.~Wlo".,'~Ili.:ltul<\IUtl,~..ol\l~iI! ".....A......"~.II'..""''''''L.'. ..~~...""..... tdll'lJ~......~IU M'" OJw~u,.."..,.J.......~""lj~,;a>oII'.!.!<..'1
Oak Park Elementary School, 6355 Osman Ave. N., Stillwater, MN 55082
t
\
t
i
, .
(;- . Existing wooden swing structure
/ II and surf.ce to remain .
( '-: 1 I
Ezisting ball I \ ~Remove acdted climber
field to remain 1 ,
J, \ .
\ \ l '~ting climber and surliu:e to
"- 0 \
.-----~ 1\"\ remam
~ i .\ ,
= ~~{' ~Ov~eqwp,^~} \
ttl1 . North i
\ Remove climber
.. J,//
... - ,4
Exis~g swings and surface to
/
./
......,
11 J
! It
Ii! t
! ; Ii"
I I i
l I}'
., / /
, 'I
I ,
I '
j_l.
I,
'II'
-~
-.......
..._--------..
","-,"-
./
. ,_.._.--~..
.~
"r
7-.;. J
. .,.--~.,. &;':'. ""'J .
//. ",:.~ 0 ~"? tree to~ '~_'.' . /
18 ',; ..f .'. '~.' I' .II .' A ,; J..., )~.._....._...-.
\ .. .._,,./\..-- \_-" \_~,.-~....
\~~dandStockpile. /r- .
.Remove 1.2"-14" depth soil ~ ".
area. replace sand for ~ .
un'" iUtyre 10"d. Wood'rmr
f
/
E~ plastic slide to
-- .
/.
/
I
/
I
I
'1''1'
Il~ ,.>>'.
,,;'JWj;:~KJrt
. ~ ~~"';,~
.. )~::
Existln,) .;"
School c'.'
."l'
" '.~'
/'
-
\
)
i
t
I
/
-
~ ~t..j
ExiStin. pment and surface
to re am
, J...
-
--J
.r--
Existing Playgr .-pd
Equipment Re~al Plan
Oak Park Elementary
School, Stillwater, MN
1;1
iJ Remove dome climber and
f' footings
'l I
\ ..Remove dolphin rocker and
' v
}' footing
I
'.
.,Remove play tractor structure
and footings
j', ,"Remove wooden play structures
(c~.slides. tires,etc~
and footings this area
{
!
,
1"= SO' .
]an.2003
;
ii'~;~~< '" .(~.
. Bxiatina School ":'
.,. " ,{,~~I" ~(
":'~~;;';~\l~,,(r:
l~" ,'';'
, .~
.'
':f
I '0,:,;
.";~ , : ~,.~',
'.1' ,/)~~.
. '~
"
,.:. !i:.~;j:< r{
) . /~ l' I
. ; !:)}X}~.:'::(. ." ~}. /
P,1"f:?'%';:.;;' . ,~ L'
:~7-:~:":';~ "?-". ~:. .~~~?tr,: ";:,
'1 ~("i'~' " ,''''' +-.1.
~
-
."'"
----
---...........
D.":_ . . ------
.L:..lWItmg trees to remam
...---
- """X,,'!! J
/'
-----,..,,'
New benches
r'
Proposed Playground
Preliminary Location Plat
,
Oak Park Elementary
School, Stillwater, MN
:;'\~ - ~ :JNew playground area foe .
younger students
ew 5' accessible
ramp/sidewalk
/
-
/
/
A..t::t.. ~ .~.
l &istin~u~qtripment and surface
to re.c:miin . .
'.
~
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
,,' ~
'(~,"', -
,~\'i,;;tc<,~',:; .
.-' - - - !~~t\~(
", ,,\, ,. ',' ,\
J:~i.\~~ i : ;;\~f~'~':' ;
/" _ _ -I"" 45' t:,i
i 3.
'n;
.1: -ti.
I _
!
~.- \
.- ,/ J . \
~ ./ \
//,
Y
..----~stk~ swings and surface to
--J. . -temain
/~
}an.2003
.
/'
;/
--~1Existing plastic slide to be
relocated
1- J1New playground area for
older students
I
,/
--....,.l"Existing swings and surface to
remam
II !:ting ball
I field to remain
~ ~..
8
-
~
i
I
}
.
I
Existing climber and surface to
remam
.,.
North t
1 t
L 4
"
'\
1" = 50t
-
;',.:';':":::\".' ,.;'....", ,'" .,:;,..,..;.:,. . "., ,,' -i-:::'-;"',:.,,:;i/:<:".:,:i'/:,X'
".,;'" ,";';';::' '/;.,:.,' .'"':. .:;.... .'r"-
{" .. ,_C" ./
:,,}'\' ,',<' ,>~ :;""~(:,, ',:
,.., .' ."~..,,_.. " . . ,~~ ~o; "<.';'.
-. . ; """--J" ~~.?'i:
':".~~', ' "',' "":',.." "";;:;!>:"".<.",.""".", ~
""(i:r . ,~~mitC)~
".~ '::;;1.,.,",1:;""".1,7.
;'-r-- j : ::: J h'}!'" "
. ,..:'. ! =~ .,....,~~~,..".,.,"",:.,.(
'J.'" .-": ,..",1' '.' '. "',..,,,,,:"."" ,"",'i':,'.,"'; ",';i<'i:'
".... :",) ,;," '.';: ,,'. . ".:':' '. .' . '. ',,' .'.:i/':""":::":'::'/'ti'.
.... :\" """";:"':':'" ""'..',,"',..'/. :'., .'. ,:,.."" .i"':: ". :. :.,. ,':,.. ,<,<":.,:,,.:.
. ..;...: . c';; i'.:"..': i"".'.., :.,...... .': :, " ., ,:,"',:{:>!"
.,.: .'",: ','i '.:.,:.; {. ,. ',,',o.'.' .' "';"'.' "'X::;:<y'..:."'
: ,.uj/:;:::.s''- .... "":; ;~(/i;:;~j!\:;j~i~,>fi!::""';:"':' " .
,:,;,',: :,~\~ '. '<;:j ::,:, /':::> .' ::,wg: ."
i:' :,;,'. .i .,; '", .' ',:: :'" . .: "Iii!:,;:
. '; .'..,; \\';.; . :'. :.'. : .' .,' c. ;;.',;. . ". "; '.','
"< ,:~;,,',,:},'::"~'.:"".'Y2 ;':,"";\',,::/'1 >;,:/.. ~::):
,("<;i'/.. i," .'\/ .:.' <'..C'" ",."'" ,'.:. '. .... ... ".< ' 'T",.:."",,,,,,. c".";;
:r" ';"t.:,.;/;,"':,>>;', '..,>,:~ 'j':... .; : "j'" .','
,,' :.:i');;;Y'!',,\).\ I:;,;f;/ ; '{<';'i.. : '.;' '~; . 'I,,' i .
(I., c,,',(:;.""; . .',p,;,"::'/,'.' ... ',.Jf ".' ;.' ;"".
. " j,~!,'" "," ";".;' .... , ....
. i}"::,;, "':C;"':'.;"
:i.(",;;" "f. ;:.
,.,,"'.
')':';,;: .,'"
';, i'i,:., ,,;;::
,}i:
j:g."'
"';'.:,\> L'" .. "t
;V'-l':(',(",(
.....;.;i;
l.~; i
-, 'D.<
; . " ~ I:'
~
~
,.1..
i
II
,",.\'
. ..'ti"',:;, .
. ,"'~<\,"';::ii' "'.;'
. .,',' ....:ii:,;,.;..' ";';'...,;""'
. ;:,cO'...:';:":',,:':',," .;.t.;".; .i... c. (;'.: .
':a,.:.;,J ..:,'" ,.....: ....,. """.';.
; 7'<)';',,; 'i'" " /:" . ,<"it, '. .. .. ,'" i', i'.'
, ;;.' i;.., (,';:--"" <:t ."
,,'. i(' ...... .:,....ii"..:..::> ':...... ".;. .'
~; S\..,p,;;',r; ;,; . ':;,:!., ",i '",".
. it, ,;~t~: ::':,c;, ;:.....: .:r'f:.' . .....;;:..,,;.;;,....',:,.:.
;;ifi}:;.,,!!,l,J;ij.:"')Ii;;;;t"""'i":', ,.) "':"l}'# rt"~'~ "'i ;'(~,f~'i;i;
. ,'::<):;., .:<';;~/. . ';'('i:>~
:",>;',i./:/Y '/;....\j,{. :' "'--i.,.",. '",:,'\'"
;;,;' ).;,;', :.: "';_;',/<;i,{ ."..., ";:;,"
;V:',,:,;"'J'f;'~:i;~~~!'/');"f1:;;";i:,i,'\,ff';':" '~"":' ,. '. .., ;' :'::'j(
: }'.:'. ,"'. '''.. ...,,'.... ,..x',:,;: " .;"
",;'; ... " ".,. ""'.'i ' .' '.
>.::.., :/<:r!':J ::'~:,.\:)~~",:,:'\?';'" /: '" ,>:..:;.,"
:,: . ,"",r;-,,,"::',(c,, eli..'~::'I;:~~"'i::" i"::;';; . ,"'. ;;
.' iii....... '. .'...:).."...... ...... '" ".
.1,:., '...' .X.... .1.. ,........ '.
". ". i.;i.;'H2" .' .....1.,"
.,>};:,,,":' "",
',::;i. ,. ';;':;,;' .
.... ~
",.,j
""'i:
.....,.",.:,.:.,/:,,':'
.V >i
':~;:i;.
: '" .,,:. ,.' ':f
d"'~' "
.~~. ,I
~111'~"
;.,.:,.. ......:..., ";/:''';'''''';:: ".
."';':';,,;' .i
I', ;, j'i..' .........,..-
" . "";":' "'.,:
.':' '.
""'i"'>
..' ....},\'..."i,
iii~ict~~C!f;"'~i'l
. ' )::
'A..,
:'1
.,....
....::
.', !.,." :". "'.
. .'. I' ." .... :'..; : ,;>
" ; .' .
..!,,:
.,
C':::':'i;;;~,:::': "
.,
"
; . .J,
":;':\:'(":"- ': "
.",.
'.".,:
.f.'<:.:i..',
..:'
'.:"
:..
. :;i'''gr::;~. ':
,', . ",... '.:,,:
i. ,,!.:
':""..
........'.'
If
i,'
,,;,}\
(~;
~;j
.:,'-).
";;:
",,'.,',
'::::''. i'."
;. .'
. "
.,.)
..... '::'-:'
,J:\.,~~ ....~;. jttJ~f....:. ),'.;6,,' .;, ... '.' <'m
.. , . i.' )', ~; ....'" .'1....... ~ .,....".
,.'.: ,.q',.. ' i>....(;,/; :i.',': ,: >:.J'.:i ~...;,?; ; .::' .;'7'(:;
:\~'V,,:_;, .., .':"" . t ,~' :_, 'oJ-;:- f' f ~ " ~I r.,::" I..f ;l:::'-::;i.:<, ' .
:.....( 4 \'" '. ,': f,;J' .. :J:: ,.~,::;.;
;',". {?)..:' 'r~ .... ."..,j ,,':'., I;.,,"',:',
" ;;"i\!~\tr;:'~i/:;I'~:1:':~j~,:Ef,?'">,,, Jr",. ,:>":",,', ~~~?,,~,.:,: ;',' L.~. '. ";", 1'::''':2'l:Y~;'.:''
\i,:i'Yk:,.:;., ""'" .'. i . I}) . ,I.
;,;:X,y ~.. ,U.~~..,. WI ".., j :>;!.. ..
""<}::"..",, ",::,..,!:ri'"",:;, ..( f; : ~ " ;~,.',!.\,';'( i.';..:'''',
" " :U;;::"./,i~:,,; 1.,J ;, "c', ~ ,"""',: ,:;,.~:f,t.t,;/i\'i
i:tI':Y'....,.,....".,' '~f-"'''''''' ....,.,,', ..,:i'/!,"
.....'.....'. ,I,;.:,..:,:.,.,.:,'~';;'''.'''' ," . .! '.:/;" ';""'~";"~\\:"""':""'" I .' ."....." '..;.
"'-. q :,,:~:.;:: " ,: ~ '_:~';'.~\\'
['ii " . ,,-i'i:i/f\.,U;::: ' : .,.=
i i d i.'. ,.3',',;'/:",:';\:\'i :i.:'K';X.;;":i{I;I;;
...: C,.':~:,,~\.',{'. :'>~.. ';}>\>,',:'':,;,~.Yf,','.,y:;::;:;:;.;,.. .
:'iF'Y;;,,'...:
\' '.,
...,,:
T
-,.
. .,.", . :'f :.'.:'.".':.;,..",:":;;.,,,:.,.;. ~
,;:U,;":: .:'i. ,."::".:,,,;, ," .'
,'i"i";::';:::"'. :,,":. '. \:,."; ,:{!;)\,' . . ". .', ,.' "':: ....;:; ".
, ,'; :"/:.i ",. "i',' ".,;;' ":".iJ'i .'. , " ,i'::'. .'"
, ,\hi,.,,'/"":" \>:;" .............> ; ",) .
;'''';;''fF: . ,;; · \\"1;-;, "r)i;;"::',i.:: ,.
:":. >; (,::' y.' '.....;.:,... ./;,.:,';, ,"... ii'>;")' ,...."..~:.I. "
/c" ."",<:""",:,/::."'i " '/.' '. '".
A ,,' :."" i.,'" , ':""'.: ." :';::/;',;:,.';;';X/ ....:10:;( :"i"';'''.
,):'~?J/,.. '::~;":i;'~ %~J~!i;i:j~,~~J~;;;i: jit:'\t".::,.;'j::;:::~::;:.{:'<;:"';;"\.(:'(,~i'::. ::J J;:,,;V"', " ,':, '
'..;;.: ".......',. ,.
lANDSCAPE
S'I'lUCI'URESINC
Oak Park Elementary
City of Stillwater
.
~oJlII;i~~~~I~l~~"
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
..
.
.
.
f:XlS IINC:7 PLAY STRUCTUReS AT OAK PARK ELEMENTARY
I
ii.
I~
'l-..
--~
?~
~.~
~-'-
~.:~::t:i{-"
....
,-
- - ..,
~"7 ."
'-~iJ~.,:(~
:::,,:?,':!:~'-:':'"
~:;,.<.
._.....-..r..:....;'.p....__.,
,d
14
:.:>....": . .
;"::: ':.
. '-~-.
EXISTING PLAY STRUCTURES
.~
AllWATER
~EA
SCHOOLS
1875 South Greeley Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Tel: 651-351-8340
fax: 651-351-8380
tdd: 651-351.8338
www.stillwater.k12.mn.us
May 13, 2003
Mayor Jay Kimble
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: Oak Park Elementary School Playground Project
Dear Mayor Kimble:
The purpose of this letter is to provide the City of Stillwater with information regarding
execution of the Playground Project at Oak Park Elementary School. Independent
School District No. 834 will act as the fiscal agent for this project and work with Sheila
Eller, Oak Park Principal, with regard to appropriate receipting and record keeping of
dollars designated for this project.
. If you have questions, please contact me at 651-351-8321.
Sincerely,
~~~
Daniel C. Parker
Assistant to the Superintendent for
Finance and Operations
DCP:ame
Copy: Sheila Eller, Oak Park Principal
Kathleen Macy, Superintendent of Schools
.
Afton-Lakeland Elementary, Andersen Elementary, Early Childhood Family Education, Lake Elmo Elementary, Lily Lake Elementary, Marine Elementary,
Oak Park Elementary, Oak-Land Junior High, Rutherford Elementary, St. Croix Valley Alternative Learning Program, Stonebridge Elementary,
Stillwater Area High School, Stillwater Junior High, Valley Crossing Community School, Withrow Elementary
.'
.
.
.
City of Oak Park Heights
]4]68 Oak Park Blvd. N. Box 2007. Oak Park Heights, MN 55082 . Phone (651) 439-4439. Fax (65]) 439-0574
April 23m, 2003
Mr. Kent Grandlienard, Town Chairman
Baytown Township
4477 Northbrook Boulevard
Stillwater, MN 55082
Mr. Jay Kimble, Mayor
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Playgrourid Funding - Oak Park Elementary
Mayor Kimble & Chainnan Grandlienard,
On April 22 the City Council reviewed the fundinl! reauest :from an Oak Park Elementary School
"parents group" for the purposes of purchasing and installing new playground equipment at the
School.
Per the "parents group" request., the total cost of the project is not to exceed $85,000 with one-
half of the funding derived :from the "parents group" and one-half arising :from our three
communities based on the percentage of students at the School.
Baytown Township
City of Oak Park Heights
City of Stillwater
TOTALS
10.6%
41.1 %
48.3 %
100.0%
At this time, the City of Oak Park Heights does generally support the project but maintains the
following concerns at this time:
1. It is our understanding that a ''joint-powers'' agreement must be entered into to proceed on
this project. Accordingly that agreement could not be written with a "parents group".
Therefore, the School District must be the partnering body with the Cities and must
ultimately execute the project via a joint-powers agreement.
The "parents group" was asked by the City Council to approach t.~e School District and
request that the District act in the name of the "parents group". At this point., we are awaiting
a response on the acceptance of the project by the School District.
2. Some statutory compliance issues may exist relative to the funding. Tfie Oak Park Council
has directed its legal staff to secure an Attorney General's opinion on the proposal.
.
Once the above issues are clarified, the City will readdress the issue and potentially allocate the
appropriate funds, subject of course to budget availability. However at this point, the City is
optimistic on the project proceeding with your partnership.
--
Adminis
.
.
.I
~
Estimtt Expenses
.
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
.
Prepared by:
Mike Coppock
Design Committee
The total estimated cost of the project, including preparation of grounds, purchase of equipment, surfacing, and installation will be $85,000.
A breakdown of the anticipated expenses is outlined below.
Item
Playground Structure
Play Oddessy Base Installed
Surfacing System
Perimeter Material
Wear Pads unders Swings &
Slides
Removal and disposal of existing
equipment and footings.
Source
Landscape Structures
Landscape Structures
B.L!.d.get Proposed -'
$64",-050.00 -- $59,506.80
$2,000.00 $2,000.00
Landscape Structures
Landscape Structures
Landscape Structures
ISO 834
Removal of sand/surface material
from existing playground surface. ISO 834
Excavating and grade work to
prep site for new playground
equipment, sidewalk and border. ISO 834
Concrete for footings. Cemstone
Bobcat w/Augar rental for footings
and bases. (w/volunteer labor)
Hammer Drill and Concrete Saw
for perimeter material.
.~~..
Concrete for accessible sidewalll,
Rebar TBD
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
$950.00
$750.00
$2,500.00
$500.00
$750.00
$300.00
$300.00
$350.00
$170.00
6/3/2003
$10,136.14
$2,557.001
$950.00
IN-KIND
IN-KIND
IN-KIND
IN-KIND
TBD
TBD
IN-KIND
$350.00
$170.00
Actual I Comment
$0.00 EFA Quote #0055915
$0.00 EFA Quote #0055915
Price includes Soft Step wood fiber,
fabric and drain aggregate delivered to
$0.00 site. EFA Quote #0055915
$0.00 EFA Quote #0055915
$0.004 x 6200# each, 5 pad needed.
IN-KIND ISO 834 to perform.
IN-KIND ISO 834 to perform.
IN-KIND ISO 834 to perform.
IN-KIND Concrete will be donated by Cemstone.
IN-KIND SUPPORT NEEDED 100
footings required. Action Rental to be
TBD contacted.
IN-KIND SUPPORT NEEDED. Action
TBD Rental to be contacted.
IN-KIND Concrete will be donated by Cemstone.
IN-KIND SUPPORT NEEDED. Action
TBD Rental to be contacted.
IN-KIND SUPPORT NEEDED. 700
linear feet of rebar and 230 spikes.
TBD Menards has been contacted.
Estimated Expenses
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Drain Tile w/mesh cover (Material
and Labor)
$180.00
$180.00
TBD
Certified installer supervisior for
community build volunteers.
Landscape Structures
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
TOTALS:
$85,000.00
$77,049.94
Prepared by:
Mike Coppock
Design Committee
IN-KIND SUPPORT NEEDED Roughly
400 linear feet. Menards has been
TBD contacted.
Equipment installatiQnsupervisor based
on 8 hour dSlysbn-site. + or~>$60/hour.
$0.00 EFA Quote #00qq915
$0.00
Notes:
1) If invoice from Landscape Structures is paid within 10 days, deduct 2% ($1526.98)
2) Cemstone approved donation of concrete on May 28th by Tom Becken, CEO of Cemstone Ready Mix, lng,
3) Play Odyssey pod needs to done a min. of 3 days prior to build weekend. We'll need v()IUriteers, concret~, mixer, & bobcat w/auger.
,
.
6.03
,
.
./
~
6/3/20tt
OAK PARK'LEMENTARY
Playground Project
Funding Report
Cash Basis January 1 to June 2, 2003
Income:
Ordinary Income/Expense:
Net Ordinary Income
Plavaround
Adventure Club
Auction
Can Recycling
Carnival
Change for Change
Dinner
Private Donations
Grants $500.00
Private Donations Oth
Raffle
Dues and Subscriptions
Bank Service Charge
Licenses and Permits
Postage and Delivery
Supplies (Spaghetti Dinner)
Total Expense
$376.00
$3,208.00
$488.7
$3,667.Q(;)
1i%,;$5Qg;91 i..
$2,376.~!5
Ii{ $9,703.25
'::':' "",~,/>
.,::~;t'
$1,464.00
$159.75
$21,949.60
$55.25
$8.00
$25.00
$129.50
$29.25
$247.00
$21,702.60
.
6/3/2003
OAK PARK ELEMENTARY
Playground Project
Funding Report
Project Budget: $85,000
City of Oak Park Heights
Source
Fund Status
L Proposed -L Committed
Bay town Township
$4,527
$4,527
Received Unanimous Support 6/2/03
$17,462
City Council Mtg June 10th
City of Stillwater
$20,511
$0
City Council Mtg June 3rd
ISO 834 Oak Park School
$7,000
$0
In-kind support value $10,000 minimum
~udents, PTA, Private OEnation
$26,726
$21,702
Totals:
$38,253
$21,702
45% to plan
support to the project and will hopefully commit funds at their next council meeting.
~
.
.
.
...,
OAK PARK'LEMENTARY
Playground Project
Overall Value
Project Value
to the Baytown Oak Park
Project Item Community Township Heights Stillwater ISO 834 Donations
Equipment $85,000 3.62% 13.960/0..\, '.16.40% 5.600/0 28.40%
Installation $30,000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 24.00%
Site Prep $10,000 0.00% 8.000/0 0.00%
Totals: 13.960/0 16.40% 13.60% 52.40%
$17,462 $20,511 $17,000 $65,500
;'
I
6/3/200.
.
In-Kind Support
Oak Park Elementary School
Playground Project
Prepared By:
Mike Coppock
Design Committee
Item
Proposed Source I Quantitv I Value I
Comment
.
Volunteer Labor for Community
Build . Community Residents
188 hours .Priceless .Various Teams needed. Sign Up Sheets.
Removal and Disposal of
Existing Equipment and Surface
Material ISD 834
To be completed by SeptemberJst.
Site Grading and Prep for New
Equipment, Drainage, &
Sidewalk. ISD 834
Level ground to a l~slope. Drain Tile trench
locations TBD b SD834. To be completed one
week prior to in n.
Sidewalk Design and Framing,
ADA Accessible ISD 834
. Pendin~
Concrete for Footings and
Sidewalk
Cemstone
350 Cubic
Feet
Donated by C~Q1stone
IDrain Tile w/mesh cover
IVendor
400 Ft
ILenqth & lavout TBD by ISD 834.
BobCat with 14-18" Augar for
Footings and Bucket for moving Community Member or
aggregate and wood fibers. Vendor
100 fogtings are needed. To be drilled the day before
in~tal~~tion is to be begin. Fencing Material required
fOF/Safety.
Concrete Mixer
Icommunity Member or
Vendor
Will need 3-4 days prior to build weekend so some
footings and bases can be done ahead of time.
Forklift
Stillwater Public Works
and/or Vendor
To be used for unloading. Date TBD.
.
Anchors for Border Material
(Rerod and Spikes)
Vendor
700
Ft of
and 230
Spikes
2-Layers: 1 st) Pre-Drill 4 holes per 8' section (230
Holes) and anchor w/3' of rerod. 2nd) Pre-Drill 4
holes per 8' section (230 Holes) and anchor w/12"
qalvanized spikes. Menards has been contacted.
Lights
ISD 834, Stillwater
& Rec and/or Pul)lic
Works
2
1 ea. In the North and South Areas. Attach to
School?
ISO 834,
& ~ec ell
Re-Paint Asphalt Play Areas. Works
4-Square, Hop Scotch, Basketball, etc.
Assorted Tools
Qommunity Members
Many
Wheelbarrows, Rakes, Shovels, Gloves, Concrete
Saw for Border, Hammer Drill for Border Anchors,
Rerod Cutter, Hand Tools, Buckets, etc.
I Meals for
I~~ndor
6
.
6/3/2003
,.
.,
.
OAK PARK ELEMENTARY
Playground Project
Funding Report
.,.
,f"
5/3103
Cash Basis January 1 to May 20, 2003
Ordinary Income/Expense:
Income:
Plavaround
Adventure Club
Auction
. .Can Recycling
Carnival
Change for Change
Dinner
Private Donations
Raffle
Total Plavaround
PT A Dues 2003
Total Income
Expense:
Dues and Subscriptions
Bank Service Charge
Postage and Delivery
Total Expense
Net Ordinary Income
.
$347.00
$3,001.00
$387.08
$3,667.00
$505.97
$2,376.05
$9,078.00
$1,464.00
$20,826.10
$159.75
$20,985.85
$55.25
$8.00
$129.50"
$192.75
$20,793.10
'*
.~
5/30.
.
OAK PARK ELEMENTARY
Playground Project
Funding Report
.
Project Budget: $85,000
Fund Status
L Proposed
Committed
Received -'
Comment
L
Source
Bay town Township
$4,527
"A"
$0
Town Board Mtg June 2nd
City of Oak Park Heights
$17,462
"A"
$0
City Council Mtg June 3rd
City of Stillwater
$20,511
$0
$0
City Council Mtg June 3rd
ISO 834 Oak Park School
$0
$7,000
$0
In-kind support value $10,000
Students, PT A, Private Donations
. =
$42,500
-
$26,726
$20,7~3
Totals:
$85,000
$33,726
$20,793
39.7% to plan
"A" Oak Park Heights and Bay town Township have pledged support to the project and will hopefully commit funds at their next council/board meetings.
...
('
5/30.
.
OAK PARK ELEMENTARY
Playground Project
Funding Report
.
;
5/301.
OAK PAR~LEMENTARY
Playground Project
Overall Value
.
Project Value Students, PT A,
to the Bay town Oak Park Private
Project Item Community Township Heights Stillwater ISO 834 Donations
-
Equipment $85,000 3.620,10 13.96% 16.400,10 5.60% 28.40%
Installation $30,000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 24.000,10
Site Prep $10,000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 8.000/0 0.00%
Totals: $125,000 3.600,10 13.96% 16.400,10 13.600,10 52.400,10
$4,527 $17,462 $20,511 $17,000 $65,500
';
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003-120
.
.
Action Rental
Advanced Sportswear
American Excelsior Co.
Ammonia House
Ancom Technical Center
Art Reach Alliance
Asmus, Mike
AT & T Wireless
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc.
Braun Pump & Controls
Carquest
Catco Parts & Service
Century Power Equipment
Chemsearch
Clarey's Safety Equipment
Comcast
Dell Marketing L.P.
Emergency Automotive Technology, Inc.
Galles Corporation
Hillyard
Hotsy
Indelco
Integra
Jani King
Johnson Radio Communications
LMC
Legislative Associates, Inc.
Linner Electric
Magnuson Law Firm
Maximum Solutions, Inc.
Menards
Minn Blue Digital Imaging
MN Board of Electricity
MN Polution Control Agency
MTI
Municipal Emergency Services
Northern Tool & Equipment
Office Depot
Olsen Construction
On Site Sanitation
PC Solutions
Rottlund Homes
R & R Specialties
St. Croix Boat & Packet Company
Sandy's Office Coffee Service
Short Elliott Hendrickson
S & T Office Products
Stillwater Gazette
T A Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc.
.
Trencher
Jerseys Adult Hockey League
Curlex & Staples
Seal Kit Compressor
Pager Repair
Art Crawl Sponsorship
Park Refund
Cell Phones
McKusick Lake Diversion Structure
Repair Marine Lift Station
Repair Parts
Repair Parts
Equipment Repair Supplies
Chemicals
Equipment Repair Supplies
Cable
Precision 340 Mini Tower
Vehicle Repair Charges
Weed Killer
Maintenance Supplies
Carbon-ate Plus Bulk Liquid
Seal Kit
Telephone
May Cleaning
Radio Repair
Seminar
May Legislative Services
New Emergency Exit Lights
Professional Service
Maintenance Agreement
Hardware
Supplies
Electrical Permits
Renewal Fee
Repair Kits
Gloves & Suspenders
Jack a Frame
Office Supplies
Replace Door & Hardware from Break In
Unit Rental Art Fest
Maintenance Contract
Grading Escrow Refund
Blade Grind
April Arena Billing
Coffee Supplies
Terra Springs
Office Supplies
Publication
Asphalt
2002 Sidewalk Rehabilitation
127.80
890.50
219.35
262.66
37.62
500.00
150.00
251.59
321.00
2,384.25
821 .35
34.42
45.87
319.91
25.00
78.15
1,922.93
61.56
1,375.60
108.95
111.29
115.07
904.50
238.56
156.22
570.00
2,916.67
2,542.00
10,022.08
167.00
408.03
195.73
50.00
23.00
100.39
648.00
24.48
146.05
1,573.00
355.60
143.00
1,500.00
179.50
32,791.74
91.00
1,019.74
120.07
72.54
798.02
24,602.89
"
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003-120 Page 2
3 D Specialties Sign Materials 1,863.14 .
Toll Welding Supplies 5.32
T omten Environmental Liberty Plan Review 160.00
Washington Cty License Center License Tabs 9.50
Workwell Occupational Health Services Vaccine 43.00
Yocum Oil Fuel 1,336.34
MANUAL CHECKS MAY 2003
Security Specialists Inc. Reimburse for Deposit Check in Error 1,599.00
Postmaster Postage May Newsletter 1,068.29
Our Saviors Lutheran Church Lily Lake Phase 2 Water Quality SS 196,943.44
Legislative Associates April Legislative Services 2,916.67
JP Morgan Chase Bank Deposit of Purchase RR Property 50,000.00
Chaves, Nick Reimburse for Grass Matting 205.96
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
Albertson, James & Janine Grading Escrow Refund 1,500.00
Bahr Construction Grading Escrow Refund 4,500.00
Barr Engineering Company SW Prison S1. Sewer Revision & Repair 13,053.60
Carquest Supplies 11.24
General Security Service Corporation Alarm System Monitoring 60.71 .
Grafix Graphics for New Squads 1,036.52
Holiday Commercial Fuel 186.34
JG House Construction Grading Escrow Refund 2,700.00
Labor Relations Assoc. Mediation Services 441.00
Met Council May 2003 SAC Charges 17,671.50
MN City/County Management Assoc. Membership 87.55
Minnesota Shredding LLC Document Shredding 205.20
Municipal Code Supplement Pages 1,120.68
New Horizons Online Training 360.00
Nextel Cell Phones 252.20
Office Depot Office Supplies 71.90
Office Max Office Supplies 277.26
O'Herron, Ray Bullet Proof Vests 2,532.39
Qwest Telephone 217.84
Rottlund Homes Grading Escrow Refund 12,000.00
State Treasurer's Office State's Share of Forfeitures 69.93
Streicher's Vest 779.95
Tee's Plus DARE Supplies 32.00
Theis Custom Homes, Inc. Grading Escrow Refund 1,500.00
U.S. Cavalry Uniforms 19.88
Walmart Parking Supplies 42.38
Washington County Attorney County's Share of Forfeitures 139.86
Wrap & Ship Freight 13.16
Xcel Electricity/Gas 15,742.55
TOTAL 425,300.98 .
.
.
.
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 120
Page 3
Adopted by the City Council this
3rd Day of June, 2003
MEMORANDUM
.
June 2, 2003
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shawn Sanders, ASSist~6ity Engineer
RE: 2002 Sidewalk Project-Change Order No. 1
Project 2002-11
DISCUSSION
.
Last fall, Ti-Zack Construction was the contractor on the City's Sidewalk Rehabilitation
Project. Since they completed the work in a timely manner they were asked if they
wanted additional work in updating pedestrian ramps this spring. They agreed to do the
extra work and use the same the unit pricing that was in the sidewalk project. An
additional item for Curb and gutter replacement will need to be added to their sidewalk
contract. Ti-Zack's quoted price for curb and gutter is $20.00 per lineal foot. 847.9 feet of
. curb was removed and replaced for a total price of $17,498.00
In the entire City had replaced 115 pedestrian ramps, at a total cost of $60,000.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Change Order 1 for the curb and gutter replacement in the amount
of$17,498.00 be approved for the 2002 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT
(project 2002-11)
ACTION REOUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting
Resolution No. 2003-- APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR THE
2002 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (project 2002-11)
.
APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #1
FOR THE 2002 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT
(pROJECT 2002-11).
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that Change Order
#1 in the amount of$17,498.00 for the 2002 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project is hereby approved:
Change order # 1
Purpose of Change Order: Add curb and gutter price per L.F. for Pedestrian Ramp Replacement
TOTAL
$ 17,498.00
Adopted by Council this 2nd day of June 2003.
Attest:
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Diane F . Ward, City Clerk
"
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
_~I' Uf ~'~LLWHI~~
PAGe. 04
Projec;t No.
2002-11
Project Description:
2002 Sidewalk Rehabilitation
The following changes shalJ be made to the CODtract docurnena:
Purpose of Change Order:
May 28, 2003
Date
I
Change Order No.
Actual
Add curb and gutter price per L. F. for Pedestrian Ramp Replacement
Basis of Cost:
x
Estimated
Quantity
Price
&:RB618C&:G
874.9 S 20.00 S 11,498.00
TOTAL:
Recommend for Approval:
$ 17,498.00
A7JOiJJ;Uk Con,"",. me.
By: V
1k6SIJJtN1
Title
Tota)
sh.:s..kAl~_
Approved by the City of Stillwater
Jay Kimble, Mayor
State of Minnesota
Gam bling Control Board
Premises Permit Renewal Application
For Board Use Only
Amt. Pd
Check #
_G2l4PPR Printed: III 0/2003
~icense Number:A-04684-001
Effective Date: 8/1/2001
Expiration Date: 7/31/2003
Name of Organization: Knights of Columbus Council 1632 Stillwater
Gamblin~ Premises Information
Name of the establishment where gambling will be conducted
K ofC Council 1632
1910 S Greeley St
Stillwater, MN 55082
County: Washington
Note: Our records show the premises
is located within the city limits
Lessor Information
Name ofthe property owner (If different):
Square footage leased per month:
Rent paid per month:
Square footage leased per bingo occasion:
Rent paid per bingo occasion:
.
Bin~o Activity
Our records indicate that Bingo is conducted on these premises. Please refer to the instructions for required at
Stora~e Information
1910 S Greeley St
Stillwater, MN 55082
Bank Information
Lake Elmo Bank
11465 39th St N
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Gambling Bank
Account Number: 0924481
On the lines provided below list the name, address and title of at least two persons authorized to sign checks and make deposits and
withdrawals for the gambling account. The organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds.
Name Address City, State, Zip Code Title
Matt Hammerschmidt
0(f1-~ j} tn~.......
7y trt> 'f & CI
57~/ Mft.A/IV;I:~ <3./-tLL wA-tL657>5fc--€tWh'hJ ,.~U I#tlf'
(Be sure to complete the reverse side of this application)
This form will be made available in alternative format (ie. large print, braille) upon request. Page] of2 (Continued on Back)
816 W Oak St
Stillwater, MN 55082
Daniel Eder
4515 Julep Ave N
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
~M t3 idoiV
RESOLUTION 2003-123
APPROVING MINNESOTA PREMISES PERMIT FOR GAMBLING FOR K OF C
COUNCIL 1632, 1910 SOUTH GREELEY STREET, STILLWATER, MN.
WHEREAS, the K of C Council 1632, 1910 South Greeley Street, Stillwater, Minnesota
has submitted an application to the City of Stillwater requesting City approval of a
Minnesota Gambling Premises Permit application; and
WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that the organization is collecting gambling
monies for lawful purposes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Stillwater approves of the
gambling license requested by the K of C Council 1632, 1910 South Greeley Street,
Stillwater, Minnesota. The Clerk is directed to sign the acknowledgement on the permit
application and to attach a copy of this Resolution to the application to be submitted to
the Gambling Control Board.
Adopted by the City Council for the City of Stillwater this 3rd day of June, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
Page 1 of 3
7/01
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
LG214 Premises Permit Application
FOR BOARD USE ONL Y
Check #
Expiratation date
Amount
Class of Permit
Premises Permit Fee
During 2nd year of
Two years organization license
Check one
D Class A .. Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels. raffles, bingo
I5?l Class B - Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles
D
$400 $200
$250 $125
$200 $100
$150 $75
D
Class C - Bingo onlyOR bingo and pull-tabs when total gross
receipts does not exceed $50,000 per year
Class D .. Raffles only
Organization Information
Organization name (as it appears on documentation filed with
Minnesota Secretary of State or Internal Revenue Service)
;;/'L{wII/-kJL L/ys-=H;'J7' 15POb
Name of chief executive officer (cannot be your gambling manager)
bAVJ d tiemrY1l:/Us
Organization license number
OI(),stI
Daytime phone number,
7/S i~8nr ar~rd8-'7
Gambling Premises Information
Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted Street address (do not use a P.O. box number)
S hLLWtt- k-n- E LJ(s -#!13 tJC6 f}~e-~~/'/ .st~&e,-f Sc<A_.1i
City & county where gambfing premises is Iocated-OR- Township & county where gambling pr~es is located if outside city fimits.
<) h if I.U+ .fc.fL lkl,Ji/<;..f.,.J
Is the premises located within city Ifmits? Yes ~ No 0
If No. is township:
o Organized
o Unorganized
o Unincorporated
Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted?
o Yes ~ No If no, attach (1) the appropriate lawful gambling lease form, and
(2) the sketch of all leased areas with dimensions and square footage clearly defined
A lease and sketch are not required for class D applications.
Namepflegalownerofpremises Address City . StatelZ~3
ChTok ,<;q q /lvw tit. 033 B,""lf" a.~. (TJtl1k-lwS"f: (HI)
lSlilb/'l LJ q, . tkS4:(', A*:~: .~4/'h.::- J2~
Address(es) of Storage Space of Gambling Equipment
List all locations where used and unused gambling product is stored. Do not use a P.O. box number.
(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.)
Address
J ? Y 7 0 Ok~ WE I tk~l2L-
_LiDS Q~~y 5!n~c:LS;
City
5it~~}c'1'L
Sft L(t.(Y4~_
StatelZip
l!JJJ
()till
/-~o~
'''''')c'\
\5"":5'0 f 2-
LG214 Premises Permit Application
Bingo Occasions for Class A or C Permits
If applying for a class A or C permit, enter day and beginning/ending hours of bingo occasions (indicate A.M. or P.M.). No
more than ten bingo occasions may be conducted per week. An occasion must be at least one and one-halfhours, not to
exceed four hours.
Qill' Beoinnina/Endina Hours
Qill'
to
to
to
to
Noon Hour Bingo Only
Qill' Beainnina/Endina Hours
~
Beainnino/Endina Hours
to
to
to
'I
Page 2 of 3
7/01
.
Beoinnina/Endina Hours
Qill'
Beoinnino/Endino Hours
to
to
to
to
to
to
~
Beainnina/Endina Hours
to
__________ to __________
to
Gambling Bank Account Information
Bank name (j S BA1U t
Bank street address (} -L. . _/ C. ..itY. i
'2. f:5 EIf-~ I- 7" 1-, UH.t+ ,5:,77 Lrc.Al;4-~
* Neworganizations: The account number may be obtained and submitted to the Gambling
Control Board within ten days after you receive your premises permit.
Name, address, and title of members authorized to sign checks from the gambling account. The organization's
treasurer may not handle gambling funds.
Name Street Address
.:-::~-O~th'-;-'
I declare that:
1. I have read this application and all information submitted
to the board is true, accurate, and complete;
2. all other required information has been fully disclosed;
3. I am the chief executive officer of the organization;
4. 1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful
operation of all activities to be conducted;
5. I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota
governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and
agree, iflicensed, to abide by those laws and rules,
including amendments to them;
Organization license authorization 6. any changes in application information will be submitted
I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to to the board and local unit of government within ten days
modiry the class of organization license to be of the change; and
consistent with the class of premises permit being
a~,' LAd,fOr. 7. I understand that failure to provide required information
/' #, ~ or providing false or misleading information may result
in the denial or revocation yfthe~cense. ~
&7- -2 ~() /'
~~;;;;Of"Chl;f.X' ,v~ Offi':;;~ot ,;gn) ~------------- ------- -----D;~.--~----
to
<c~ #1IJ44/~-J
Acknowledgment
Gambling site authorization
I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers,
the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner
of revenue or public safety or agents of the
commissioners may enter the premises to enforce the
law.
Bank records information
The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of
the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill
requirements of current gambling rules and law.
Bank account number* '
St~te/Zip code
fflIJ ~~-d &c.-
.
City
Zip Code
Title
.
.
LG214 Premises Permit Application
Page 3 of 3
7/01
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment and Approval
If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application and provide a resolution.
On behalf of the city, I hereby acknowledge this
application for lawful gambling activity at the premises
located within the city's jurisdiction, and that a Print name of city
resolution specifically approving or denying the
application will be forwarded to the applying
organization. Signature of city personnel receiving apprlCation
Title Date
If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county and township must sign this application.
The county must provide a resolution.
For the townshio On behalf of the township, I
acknowledge that the organization is applying to
conduct lawful gambling activity within the township
limits.
A township has no statutory authority to approve or
deny an application (Minn. Stat. 349.213, subd. 2).
.
For the county On behalf of the county, I hereby
acknowledge this application for lawful gambling
activity at the premises located within the county's
jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically
approved or denying the application will be for-
warded to the applying organization.
The infonnation requested on this form (and any
attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board
(Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in
lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, and to assist the
Board in conducting a background investigation of you.
You have the right to refuse to supply the information
requested; however, if you refuse to supply this
infonnation, the Board may not be able to determine your
qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue
you a premises pennit. If you supply the information
requested, the Board will be able to process your
application.
This form may require the disclosure of your Social
Security number. If so, your Social Security number will
be used to determine your compliance with the tax laws of
Minnesota. Authorization for requiring your Social
Security number is found at 42 US.C. 405 (c)(i).
Print name of township
Signature of township official acknowledging appfication
Title
Date
Print name of county
Signature of county personnel receiving application
Title
Date
premises permit, all of the infonnation that you have
provided to the Board in the process of applying for your
premises permit will become public except for your Social
Security number, which remains private. If the Board does
not issue you a premises permit, all the infunnation you
have provided in the process of applying for a premises
permit remains private, with the exception of your name
and address which will remain public.
Private data about you are available only to the following:
Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment
requires that they have access to the information; the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota
Attorney General; the Minnesota Commissioners of
Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota
Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling
regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other
individuals and agencies that are specifically authorized by
state or federal law to have access to the information;
individuals and agencies for which law or legal order
authorizes a new use or sharing of infonnation after this
Notice was given; and anyone with your consent.
Your name and address will be public information when
received by the Board. All the other information that you
provide will be private data about you until the Board issues
your premises pennit. When the Board issues your
Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-639-4000. If you use a TTY, you can call
the Board by using the Minnesota Relay Service and ask to place a call to 65 1 -639-4000. This fonn will be made available in
alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request.
.
RESOLUTION 2003-124
APPROVING MINNESOTA PREMISES PERMIT FOR GAMBLING FOR
STILLWATER LODGE #179 BPOE, 1905 SOUTH GREELEY STREET,
STILLWATER, MN.
WHEREAS, the Stillwater Lodge #179 BPOE, 1905 South Greeley Street, Stillwater,
Minnesota has submitted an application to the City of Stillwater requesting City approval
of a Minnesota Gambling Premises Permit application; and
WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that the organization is collecting gambling
monies for lawful purposes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Stillwater approves of the
gambling license requested by the Stillwater Lodge #179 BPOE, 1905 South Greeley
Street, Stillwater, Minnesota. The Clerk is directed to sign the acknowledgement on the
permit application and to attach a copy of this Resolution to the application to be
submitted to the Gambling Control Board.
Adopted by the City Council for the City of Stillwater this 3rd day of June, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 120
.
.
Action Rental
Advanced Sportswear
American Excelsior Co.
Ammonia House
Ancom Technical Center
Art Reach Alliance
Asmus, Mike
AT & T Wireless
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc.
Braun Pump & Controls
Carquest
Catco Parts & Service
Century Power Equipment
Chemsearch
Clarey's Safety Equipment
Comcast
Dell Marketing L.P.
Emergency Automotive Technology, Inc.
Galles Corporation
Hillyard
Hotsy
Indelco
Integ ra
Jani King
Johnson Radio Communications
LMC
Legislative Associates, Inc.
Linner Electric
Magnuson Law Firm
Maximum Solutions, Inc.
Menards
Minn Blue Digital Imaging
MN Board of Electricity
MN Polution Control Agency
MTI
Municipal Emergency Services
Northern Tool & Equipment
Office Depot
Olsen Construction
On Site Sanitation
PC Solutions
Rottlund Homes
R & R Specialties
St. Croix Boat & Packet Company
Sandy's Office Coffee Service
Short Elliott Hendrickson
S & T Office Products
Stillwater Gazette
TA Schifsky & Sons, Inc.
Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc.
.
Trencher
Jerseys Adult Hockey League
Curlex & Staples
Seal Kit Compressor
Pager Repair
Art Crawl Sponsorship
Park Refund
Cell Phones
McKusick Lake Diversion Structure
Repair Marine Lift Station
Repair Parts
Repair Parts
Equipment Repair Supplies
Chemicals
Equipment Repair Supplies
Cable
Precision 340 Mini Tower
Vehicle Repair Charges
Weed Killer
Maintenance Supplies
Carbon-ate Plus Bulk Liquid
Seal Kit
Telephone
May Cleaning
Radio Repair
Seminar
May Legislative Services
New Emergency Exit Lights
Professional Service
Maintenance Agreement
Hardware
Supplies
Electrical Permits
Renewal Fee
Repair Kits
Gloves & Suspenders
Jack a Frame
Office Supplies
Replace Door & Hardware from Break In
Unit Rental Art Fest
Maintenance Contract
Grading Escrow Refund
Blade Grind
April Arena Billing
Coffee Supplies
Terra Springs
Office Supplies
Publication
Asphalt
2002 Sidewalk Rehabilitation
127.80
890.50
219.35
262.66
37.62
500.00
150.00
251.59
321.00
2,384.25
821.35
34.42
45.87
319.91
25.00
78.15
1,922.93
61.56
1,375.60
108.95
111.29
115.07
904.50
238.56
156.22
570.00
2,916.67
2,542.00
10,022.08
167.00
408.03
195.73
50.00
23.00
100.39
648.00
24.48
146.05
1,573.00
355.60
143.00
1,500.00
179.50
32,791.74
91.00
1,019.74
120.07
72.54
798.02
24,602.89
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003-120
3 D Specialties
Toll
Tomten Environmental
Washington Cty License Center
Workwell Occupational Health Services
Yocum Oil
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003-119
Adopted by the City Council this
3rd Day of June, 2003
Page 2
Sign Materials
Welding Supplies
Liberty Plan Review
License Tabs
Vaccine
Fuel
753.67
5.32
160.00
9.50
43.00
1,336.34
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
t/-".
~em.
T.:
Fntm:
.ate:
Su},ject:
Mayor and City Council /L
Steve :Russell, Community J)evelopment Birector
May 38, 2..3
keview and ))ecision on Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) for
Terra Springs Project
:Jackground:
An EA W for the Terra Springs project is required because the site of the Territorial Prison is
on the National Register of Historic place. EA W's review all aspects of environmental ' ,
effect although the primary area of concern is cultural impact.
A copy of the EA W is attached, Exhibit "AU. The availability of the document for comment
was published in the Environmental Monitor by the State Environmental Quality Board,
EQB. The 31-day comment period ran from April 28 to May 28th. Comments were
reviewed from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnIDOT), Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Metropolitan Council, and Minnesota Historical Society
(MHS). A copy of comments are attached as "Exhibit BU.
This report responds to the comments from the four agencies, describes mitigations to
minimize the environmental effects of the development and provides finding of fact and
draft record of determination.
Comments and Response
The following comments were received and responses provided. Refer to the # on the
Agency comment letter for corresponding responses.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION:
#1. Mn/DOT controls access to TH95. An access permit is required from that agency~
Their concern can be addressed through permit review.
#2 A drainage permit is required llum MnlDOT. Any MnlDOT drainage requirements
will be.addressed through that permit.
#3
Noise standards are being addressed through specific building design. Noise levels
along North Main Street do not typically exceed standards. No noise mitigation
requested from state.
#4
The impact on the wayside is addressed under question 25(a) of the EA W.
Relocation of the site is being coordinated with State Historic Preservation Office.
--,
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
.
#1 A sewer extension permit is being requested from MPCA and Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services. Adequate capacity exists in the plant and transmission line
to accommodate estimated flows based on the City Comprehensive Plan.
MET COUNCIL
Met Council response states, "that the EA W is complete and accurate and raises no major
issues of consistency with council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes."
#1 The site is not located in the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway.
#2 Note MPCA comment above. Permits from DNR and MPCA will be applied for.
#3 Significant effort was put into an analysis of the unusual ground water situation on the
site. Currently the site has significant surface water that results from springs
discharging onto and through the site. This water will be managed through a extensive
drain tile system. Dewatering of the site for underground parking structures will result
in a discharge through the drain tile system. All ofthe groundwater collected through
this system will be used in a geothermal system and ultimately discharged into the river.
Analysis of the site shows that existing ground water on the site ultimately discharges to
the river either via the springs that discharge onto the site or underground flow to the .
river. - K.E. City Engineer
#4 It is anticipated that a dewatering plan will be necessary to construct and reconstruct
portions of this project. The report llum Allied Testing describes some of the issues that
will be encounter and should be referred to for further explanation. - K.E. City Engineer
#5 The site is not in the St. Croix flood
#6 The City of Stillwater required significant and substantial amounts of engineering and
scientific analysis .to demonstrate that the storm water management plan will function as
anticipated and for further explanation of the various systems that will be used for this
site and how they will function the site storm water management dated March 10, 2003
prepared by BKBM Engineers Inc. should be referred to. - K.E. City Engineer
#7 The cited map makes many a priori assumptions on a regional basis. The very high
pollution sensitivity indicates that site-specific conditions must be examined. The
bedrock directly under most of the site is part of the St. Lawrence Formation. At the site
is has low primary permeability. Water flows through a secondary permeability network
of fractures, cracks, bedding planes, andjoints. The red color of the rock and high iron
content of water from this formation indicates that the pattern of flow in the bedrock has
been goings on for a very long time. Rocks with flow mostly through secondary
permeability systems are not generally sensitive to contamination. However, the area of
the buried bedrock valley on the site can be considered a sensitive area. .
#8 The Terra Springs project interpretive trail will connect to a future regional trail and
future sidewalks and pedestrian trails connecting the project to downtown.
~
. MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY:
#1 The developer has proposed an alternative method of mitigating archeological resources
as written in letterto Howard Lieberman, Chairman HPC, items 1-6. (Attached Exhibit.
"C")
#2 The City and developer will coordinate the relocation ofthe wayside with Tim Glines,
MHS.
#3 An interpretive trail and center is a part of the Terra Springs prC?ject. A committee with
City of Stillwater HPC members has been established to aid in the development and
design of the trail historic content of the inkJ.}JJ.etation.
#4 Monitoring of construction impacts on Wardens house will be an element of
construction arrangement. Adequate on site parking is being provided to accommodate
the new use. Depending on the interest of the Washington County Historical Society a
national register may be appropriate.
#5 No comment necessary.
Conclusion
.
Based on the EA W, Agency comments, and responses, mitigations as listed below, and review
of criteria for significance, it is recommended that a negative declaration be issued for the Terra
Springs PUD as contained in attached resolution.
Mitigation Measures
Historic Resources
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
.
7.
The prison wall shall be repaired, restored and preserved to protect its historic
integrity.
An interpretive center shall be developed on the southwest comer of the site
featuring the walls of the original prison building.
An interpretive trail shall be constructed along the wall around the parameter of the
entire site.
An archeological green commons area, including the ruin walls of the manufacturing
building and the warden house shall be constructed as part of Phase 1 development.
The original territorial buildings architecture shall be captured in new and existing
building renovation through City HPC design review.
A state registered archeologist shall be hired by the developer to ensure the
development proceeds within the ap}JJ.upriate historic framework making sure
significant historical "finds" during site construction can be properly addressed.
The wayside rest area shall be relocated to the north wall location as shown on site
plan.
~.. .
.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE TERRA
.. -. . . .. .
SPRINGS'PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL .
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has duly prepared an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Terra Springs Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City has received and responded to comments on the EAW; and
WHEREAS, the City has duly prepared a Record of Decision, which is attached
as "Exhibit A".
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Stillwater, Minnesota:
1.
The Record of Decision for Terra Springs is hereby accepted and
approved.
A negative declaration for the Terra Springs Planned Unit
Development Environmental Assessment is ordered and an
Environmental Impact Statement shall not be required.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, MN this 3rd day of June
2003.
2.
.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, CityClerk
.
Exhibit A
.
City of Stillwater
~.'I.
Record of Decision
Terra Springs PUD EA W
I. Background
The Terra Springs PUD is a 227 unit mixed use attached single family
development with 9000 sq feet of retail space and 4000 sq feet of office space in
the City of Stillwater. A mandatory EA W was required under Minnesota rules
4410.4300 Subpart 31. The City of Maple Grove is the RGU and prepared an
EA W according to EQB rules, with assistance from the 106 group. Notice of
availability of the EA W was published in the EQB monitor on April 28, 2003.
the 30-day comment period expired on May 28, 2003.
II. Comments on the EA W were received from four agencies:
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Metropolitan Council
Minnesota Historical Society
.
III.
Comnients are included as Exhibit "B". Responses to comnients are listed below.
The following comments were received and responses provided. Refer to the # on
the Agency comment letter for corresponding responses.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
#1. MnlDOT controls access to TH95. An access permit is required fivm that
agency. Their concern can be addressed through permit review.
#2 A drainage permit is required from Mn/DOT. Any MnlDOT drainage
requirements will be addressed through that permit.
#3 Noise standards are being addressed through specific building design.
Noise levels along North Main Street do not typically exceed standards.
No noise mitigation requested from state.
#4 The impact on the wayside is addressed under question 25(a) of the EA W.
Relocation of the site is being coordinated with State Historic Preservation
Office.
.
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
..
..
.
#1 A sewer extension permit is being requested from MPCA and
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. Adequate capacity exists
in the plant and tran~mission line to accommodate estimated flows based
on the City Comprehensive Plan.
,MET COUNCIL
Met Council response states, "that the EA W is complete and accurate and raises
no major issues of consistency with council policies. An EIS is not necessary for
regional purposes."
#1 The site is not located in the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway.
#2 Note MPCA comment above. Permits from DNR and MPCA will be
applied for.
#3 Significant effort was put into an analysis of the unusual ground water
situation on the site. Currently the site has significant surface water that
results from springs discharging onto and through the site. This water will be
managed through a extensive drain tile system. Dewatering of the site for
underground parking structures will result in a discharge through the drain tile
system. All of the groundwater collected through this system will be used in a .
geothermal system and ultimately discharged into the river. Analysis of the .
site shows that existing ground water on the site ultimately discharges to the
river either via the springs that discharge onto the site or underground flow to
the river. - K.E. City Engineer
#4 It is anticipated that a dewatering plan will be necessary to construct and
reconstruct portions of this project. The report fiv.lJ.1 Allied Testing describes
some of the issues that will be encounter and should be referred to for further
explanation. - K.E. City Engineer
#5 The site is not in the St. Croix flood
#7
#6 The City of Stillwater required significant and substantial amounts of
engineering and scientific analysis to demonstrate that the storm water
management plan will function as anticipated and for further explanation of
the various systems that will be used for this site and how they will function
the site storm water management dated March 10, 2003 prepared by BKBM
Engineers Inc. should be referred to. - K.E. City Engineer
The cited map makes many a priori assumptions on a regional basis. The very
high pollution sensitivity indicates that site-specific conditions must be
examined. The bedrock directly under most of the site is part of the St.
Lawrence Formation. At the site is has low primary permeability. Water
flows through a secondary permeability network of fractures, cracks, bedding
.
.
planes, andjoints. The red color of the rock and high iron content of water
from this formation inditates that the pattern of flow in the bedrock has been
goings on for a very long time. Rocks with flow mostly through secondary
permeability systems are not generally sensitive to contamination. However,
the area of the buried bedrock valley on the site can be considered a sensitive
area.
#8
The Terra Springs project interpretive trail will connect to a future regional
trail and future sidewalks and pedestrian trails connecting the project to
downtown.
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
#1 The developer has proposed an alternative method of mitigating archeological
resources as written in letter to Howard Lieberman, Chairman HPC, items 1-6.
(Attached Exhibit "C")
#2 The City and developer will coordinate the relocation ofthe wayside with Tim ,
Glines, MRS.
#3 An interpretive trail and center is a part of the Terra Springs project. A
committee with City of Stillwater HPC members has been established to aid in
the development and design of the trail historic content of the interpretation.
.
#4
Monitoring of construction impacts on Wardens house will be an element of
construction arrangement. Adequate on site parking is being provided to
accommodate the new use. Depending on the interest of the Washington
County Historical Society a national register may be appropriate.
#5 No comment necessary.
IV. Finding of Fact.
A. The proposed Terra Springs mixed use PUD is served by City services.
B. Adequate access to the site is provided by TH 95.
C. Storm water quality of runoff from the site will increase as a result of site
development.
D. Historic resources mitigation have been conditional as a part of p.lvject
approval as stated.
1. The wall around the prison site shall be repaired and reconstructed.
2.
The wayside shall be relocated as a destination point on the
interpretive trail.
.
3.
An interpretive trail and center for the site shall be constructed as a
part of project dc;lvel...,t'.uent.
4. The developer shall contract with a registered state archeologistto
monitor and document significant historic resource during
construction.
5. The EA Wand responses to comments have adequately addressed
issues contained in the worksheet.
6. The proposed development does not create a cumulative impact.
7. There have been no comments received suggesting that further
environmental review is warranted.
8. The City fmds that the project as proposed does not have a
potential for significant environmental impact.
IV. The City of Stillwater finds that the proposed Terra Springs PUD does not have
the potential for significant environmental impact and issue a negative declaration
with mitigation on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
.
.
.
tyn/ hi f''fflf
EN\! lKONMENTAL ASSESS:MENT WORKSHEET
Note to preparers: This form is available at ~.mnplan.state.mn.us. EA W Guidelines will be available In
Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental ASsessment Worksheet provides information about a project that
may have the potential for significant environmen~l effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible
Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The
project t'." ...oser must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the rmal workshec:t.
Ifa complete answer does not fitin the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complc:tequestion
as well as the answer must be included iftheEA W is prepared electronically. .
Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice
of the EA W in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential
impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS.
.
1. Project title
2. Proposer
Contact person
Title
Address
City, state, ZIP
Phone
Fax
E-mail
Terra Sorings Mi~F;t;1, Vse 1)F;v~lopment
Frauenshuh Sweenev
Brian Sweenev
President
'180 East 5th Street - #16Q
St. Paul. MN 55101
651-291-359l
651-223-5652
Brianlalfsweenev.com
3. RGU City of~tillwater
Contact person ~t,~ve Russell
Title Community Develooment Director
Address 216 N 4ib Street
City, state, ZIP Stillwater MN 55082
Phone 651-430-8821 .
Fax 651-430-8810
E-mail srusselllalci..stillwater.mn.us
4. Reason for EA W preparation (check one)
EIS scoping X Mandatory EA W Citizen petition
RGU discretion
Proposer volunteered
IfEA W or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number 31, and subpart name Historical Places.
.
5. Project location County Washimrton
Cityffownship City of Stillwater
N ~ of the NE ~ Section 28
Township 30N
Range 20W
Attach each ofthe following to the EA W:
· County map showing the general location of the project; - Map 1 attached
· U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy
acceptable); Map 2 attached
· Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. Map 3 attached
6. Description
a. Provide a project summary of SO words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor.
The proposed development ofthe 7.93 acre site is a mixed-use in fill development. The site as located
on the north end of Stillwater's Main Street where the Territorial Prison once stood. A fire last .
September destroyed the last remaining prison buildings. The proposal is for 227 residential unitS'. .'
housed in' five (5) buildings of beightsof 25, 40, 50 and possibly 90 feet. A perimeter hiterpretive trail
and large green courtyard is proposed as part of site design. Planning applications required for
project approval include Subdivision, Planned Unit Development Permit, Design Permit and possible
variance (building height).
b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as
necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the
environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and
significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of
construction activities. .
.
Existing structures will remain on stie, the new construction of five (5) new housing buildings will not
cause significant manipulation of the environment or produce any hazardous waste. The project
consists of five (5) new multi-family housing buildings with approximately 13,000 square feet of retail
space and with related site improvements. See site plan, Map 3 and below for more specific building
and project.
h
t~
~"
fLtj
.~,~
II..,,' -
-.....
.
.,
~. . . ..
....
,
~_..'.._......~..._.~~~.~~.
: a_ .8" ....1).
: . ....... \
.
: ......
:" '0
.
.
.
o
--
I-
...-- ."
rJ ~ ~-
, ~
..........1 ~-
?T" It
........ I
tt !
r:J !...-
--' q
&
,...v...~...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.......
.";
".,' .--..'.
Principal ArterIals
ro,(. ANOKA
- \ -- I
). D"
,-~~
____~ ~f<-
.
...........
.
.
.
. .
. . a:w.--=-
.
.
.
.
...- -.-
:~
.
.
-
)
I
-':"_----r..
i ~.... -.
-j -.i-~
......J.....:
j.'
.
,
,
-'
__ }.J
,
,
_rYi
. . ...
, '.
ti.....~.=_._. · .! ~
..............................
............
--
.
CI)
N~~
~~
~
I
DOWNTO\'\1N ~:~~
:NO~ ~ HOUSING"INFILL
. - ...--&.~...~.~
"LOCATION MAP
r'
.,
()l
~
"-
i
}
T.
a
-\
or
\"
[U
..\
4 ).. ,..
\'
\
r'
(
>
j
~
l l', ..
f: ~ -I:~~
'~l ~~~i!d"
I ~~'
I f
:a.. ,
1
II~~'
"!'..~. i ~
l,
"~ .
~:\
. 'th'~:
.-1".,.. 'ir" . ...~
--0 J", . ~t,. . <;
l~l.t.'~1'~, =." ~ '\~
. ...~::...1!,. ."\
: '. --: >{, ~
~~ ') ')
~..~ ~'s..
.IS '':4' ,>' ..,-'~
~jJ;lJ) 1 Je
/iJAP 3-13... " ~l,
: J ill::
TERRASPRINGS gV/~71A1tr 1. . ~,H'i 1.1..!
..II..'.,.,.II:..IAIN...-.....:..lo. mLL\VATER.ftfINN. ;,;0. i
en'
\
. .
,
l
\l. ~
l
.~',~
wi ..,.:." '.' -.>..
. ;:y,....., ,;;
.---T.)...._ :_....:
~.~, "\ "'."'7
:.
z
()
T
-I
J:
.
I r
r-
\n
J.
~
o
L
>,
''1
....
~
".'
"
, t....
~
()"
i~
~.:
.
I'U
~~
a .
T..~
TERRASPRINGS
,Ie. ,'" "MAIN SI'IUU!T STILL\Y ATEa. MINN.
~ 'Y . , .
~'
I. .~'
....).
'.
.
t:,:-.,--
7.
~
r
-\
1
-_._...:..:....-f
I"
\
1'1
.
<
)
~
\
Q
L
o ,
- <;''f';''/
I ' 1'. _.
- ~]-:::- ./'7;
~...v ...~_
So" "i". ~,2:,;'
.~~~\::>
, ~"\.~~
.
~
II.
\
'.
.
\ ',.' ."
.- O'''''''"''''''''"''''-~T-;':'.,~:~;;;::.''';...;; i .~.
-~..'."''''''.~'''''''.;"''~<,,.z~~~';''''_,.,o,..,;..,;.;. ,
";~.~;~~",;i:">",' .".:: .;. "".. . ;': . ..
"I~
~!'11
~t'~
\ ')
, i
" -="
I'
;
;r.,'
i~t).o1~'".. .
-~ .
'\
>
()I
-I .. ,.
"
\.
I
II'
<
)-
I
o
1.
,
-
tl
.-
II.
(h1f(J ;.. b.
J' I~ i!!~
di . ~ji!C
f'~1 I I
f}(I/L PbVo/ Z. ~. ~f
j ,
,
,"
'L 0
~ ,
.~ - ..... ~--j ,
"~'), .. :> ()
cP ,'0 c
-I '1 \
fffJ :) I
~
r ,
r I U
[- r
< If
> <
-/ -
".-- '>
- -
\) 1- -I
l -
Q .
l
... I,'. I. ' .. '1"" . ~..I,. ... ...
110."" ....
"4',
.....
.....,
,-'
.l
.~
\
"
.
6"
':
.>.
"
'"
. .~ J~.~;
S . i ~
_: " -.-.
n~'
~6
H
~~
TEWSPRINGS
.. ......, MAIN S'I'REET SJ1LL\YATER, MINN.
-
..,."
.' ,......~,;:'i~:,~;::,; ~:::::;~~;/t~:S5f~~
\
-. --,
.j
\
'r'
.:.r
';';
.
1JJ4fJ J"'b
&/ /'-~'IA/'r 1-
J. i~
'f'
~II
l!!~
l'ISc
!!!~>
l:!~r
l~fl~~
c. Explain the project purpose; if the project wiJI be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the
project and identify its beneficiaries.
.
Develop a medium density mixed-use.dt;yelopment that will reuse a tremendously underutilized
parcel of city-owned land in downtown Stillwater, Minnesota. It will not only add to the economic
vitality of Stillwater, but also will preserve and document the tremendous cultural, archeological and
natural elements of this site. In addition to the housing, retail and office Elements there will be an
interpretive center and interpretive trails preserving and showcasing the limestone walls as well as
the runs on the site. . '.'
d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? _Yes
X. No
If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review.
e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _Yes -X..No
If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review.
7. Project magnitude data
Total project acreage 7,93 acres
Number of residential units: unattached -0- attached 227 maximum units per building 90
Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): total square feet
..
Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet):
Office 4.000
Retail 9.000
Warehouse
Light industrial
Other commercial (specify)
Building height If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings
Different building heights... 25 feet, 40 feet, 50 feet and 90 feet (Highest building downtown 60-70
feet)
Manufacturing
Other industrial
Institutional
Agricultural
8. Permits and approvals required. List all known local, state and federal pennits, approvals and financial
assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing pennits, governmental review of plans and all
direct and indirect fonns of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and
infrastructure.
Unit of Ilovernment
City of Stillwater
Tvoe of aoolication
Subdivision, Planned Unit Dev,
Possible Variance (Height),
Design Pennit, Access Pennit
Status
In progress
9. Land use, Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss
project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve
environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil
contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines.... .'
The site was originally a Territorial Prison, Over the years most ofthe prison buildings have been
removed. In September 2002 a tragic fire destroyed the last major building on the site. A portion of
a storage building remains and will be incorporated into the proposed site design. The City's
Comprehensive Downtown Plan and Downtown Plan call for adoptive reuse ofthe site and building.
City housing policy call for infill development, development where urban services are available. The
proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning.
10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after
development:
.
Types 1-8 wetlands
Wooded/forest
Brush/Grassland
Cropland
Before
o
o
o
o
After
o
o
o
o
TOTAL
Before
Lawnllandscaping
Impervious surfaces
Other ( describe)
After
2.64 acres
3.72 acres
1.57 acres
7.93 acres
If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why:
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Impervious _
Pervious -
TOTAL
4.08 acres
3.85 acres
7.93 acres
.
11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources
a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected
by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. None known.
b. Are an)'. state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern). species, rare plant communities or other . .'.
sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat; c()loriial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally'
rare plant communities on or near the site? _Yes lNo
If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the
resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research
program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: . Describe measures to minimize or
avoid adverse impacts.
, .
~, ~.
12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration-
dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment - of any surface waters such as
a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? _Yes .lLNo
If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s} if the water
resources affected are on the PWI: . Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to
minimize impacts.
13. Water use, Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in
any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? _Yes
X No
If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made,
and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique
well numbers and DNR appropriation penn it numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site ..
map. Ifthere are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to detennine.
14. Water-related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning
district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use
district? _Yes K.. No
If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions.
15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? _Yes
X No
-If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts
with other uses.
16. Erosion and sedimentation, Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be
moved:
acres 7.93 ; cubic yards 78.000 . Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them
on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedim.:.uk.~ion control measures to be used during and after project
, construction.' . . ... . .
Flat site that will balance with the placement of the buildings and site improvements.
Typical silt fencing and water control measures will be used
17. Water quality: surface water runoff
a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe pennanent controls to
manage or treat runoff. Describe any stonnwater pollution prevention plans.
The developed site will improve water quality and decrease the quantity of storm water runoff from
the site, Approximately one-half of the existing site is surfaced with gravel or bituminous. There is ..
no rate control or water quality treatment facilities presently on site. Runoff flows primarily from
west to east toward Main Street, and into the city storm sewer system, which outlets to the St. Croix
River.
.
A comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan has been designed1"or the Site. We plan on
minimizing pollution and runoff by providing on-site storm water detention facilities and storm
water treatment trains. Due to the site constraints, the proposed plan indicates utilizing natural
measures for treatment, including rain gardens and grass swales. Other site storm water
treatment practices indicated by the proposed plan are by permeable paving stone, sump catch
basins, underground water quality treatment structures and an underground sand filter drain field.
A Maintenance Program for the developed site will include a recommended schedule for cleaning
and inspection of the storm water quality treatment facilities. The Site Storm Water Management
Plan anticipates meeting or exceeding guidelines set by the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program with
these practices in place. . . .. .
The quantity of runoff from the site will be significantly decreased due to site improvements. Runoff
reduction percentages are as follows: l-yearl24-hour storm - 90% decrease; 10-year/14-hour storm -
50% decrease; 100-year/14-hour storm; 25% decrease.
b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as
well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters.
Storm water runoff on-site will be conveyed by pipe to the St, Croix River. With regular ongoing
maintenance of on-site storm water treatment facilities, the proposed stormwater managment
plans anticipates a 90% or greater Total Suspended Solids removal and a 70% or greater Total
Phosphorus removal from storm water effluent. Considering these removal efficiencies, the
impact of stormwater effluent from the site will have very negligible impact on the river.
18. Water quality: wastewaters
a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or
treated at the site. Residential waste water will be discharged into municipal system.
.
b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after
treatment. Identify receivin~ waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge
impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability
of site conditions for such systems. Runoff rates maintained at or below currentlevels.
c. Ifwastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any
pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes,
identifying any improvements necessary. Oak Park Heights Meto Waste facility, adequate capacity per
Comprehensive Plan, normal residential waste.
d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss
capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any
required setbacks for land disposal systems. None
19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions
a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: minimum average
to bedrock: minimum average
Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to groundwater and also identify them on the site map:
sinkholes, shallow limestone fonnations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize
environmental problems due to any of these hazards. (Attached response Exhibit "A")
b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, ifknown. Discuss soil granularity and
potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any
mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. (Attached response Exhibit " A")
.
20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks
a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure,
sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For
projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate ifthere is a source separation plan; descn'be how the
project will be modified for recycling. Ifhazardous waste is generated, indicate ifthere is a hazardous
waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments.
Project will generate no hazardous wast. Construction waste will be separated and recycled
(cardboard, clean wood, glass, plastic).
b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used
to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a
regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the .
waste, discharge or emission. ' '., ..
The construction project will not use hazard ours or toxic materials in any quantity that will
contaminate the groundwater supply.
c.Indicatethe number,location, size and use orany above or below ground tanks to store petroleum productS
or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. - -
None to our knowledge. Site has MPCA, No Association and No Action Letters
21. Traffic. Parking spaces added 350 . Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) 200, Estimated total
average daily traffic generated 1700. Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of
occurrence: 100 a.m.lllO p.m, Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and
describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss
its impact on the regional transportation system. (Attached response Exhibit "B")
22. Vehicle-related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including
carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality
impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EA W Guidelines about whether a
detailed air quality analysis is needed. Recent use of the site was a bus repair storage yard for school bus
fleet parking Jot. Additional new spaces added estimated at 305, The site is downtown infilJ site with
traiUsidewalk access to community and recreation services reducing need for automobiles.
23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions
from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any
hazardous air pollutants (consult EA W Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon '.. '
dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-clepleting chemicals (chloro-fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons,
perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and
proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. None proposed
24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation?
_Yes ]LNo Construction will cause a normal amount of noise and dust. City regulates control levels.
If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate
adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss
potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be
discussed at item 23 instead ofhere.)
25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site?
A. Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? lYes _No (Attached response Exhibit
"C")
B. Prime or unique farmlands or Jand within an agricultural preserve? _Yes ..1LNo
C. Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? . X Yes No
D. Scenic views and vistas? Yes X No - -
E. Other unique resources? Yes X No
If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to
minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
A. Archaeological, historical resource (see Exhibit "C")
B. Designated parks, recreation areas, and trails. An interpretive trail plan has been approved by the
City for the site. The development includes a perimeter trail around the prison wall, Park space is
provided in the courtyard/green area.
26. Visual impacts, Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare.
from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust
stacks? _Yes ..K...No Site is set below surrounding bluffs
If yes, explain.
27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive
.
plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local,
regional, state or federal agency?
X Yes _No. If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any
conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain.
28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or
public services be required to serve the project? _Yes X No. If yes, describe the new or additional
infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project
must be assessed in the EA W; see EA W Guidelines for details.)
II. .
Existing City utilities and roads service the site.
29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the
"cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an
environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may
interact with the project described in this EA W in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Descn"be the
nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining
whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each
cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form).
This is a stand alone project, no additional development impacts are anticipated
30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not
addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. None known
31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EA W is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address
relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W. List any impacts and
issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any
alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including
those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions.
.
No impacts have been identified that would require mitigation beyond what has been
described in the EA W. Because of the fire on September 6, 2002, the site lost the key to the
site's listing on the National Historical Register. Therefore, the remaining elements oC
significant value include the Historic Prison wall, the archeological amenities, and remnant
foundation of the buildings destroyed by fire. Since the prison wall will be improved and
repaired consistent with historical standards, it will not be moved or destroyed. The wall
will remain, rehabilitated for the viewing by pedestrians on a trail that will be constructed
around the perimeter of the wall base.
The archeological elements have been identified and preserved in all feasible ways by
preventing building on the most important sites within the development.
The remains and remnants of the buildings destroyed by fire will be included in a park that
will allow viewing of the ruins in a controlled setting. The project will improve public
opportunities for viewing important elements by not only stabilizing the elements Croni, " .
further deterioration and neglect, but by creating public viewing opportunities In a safe and
controlled manner. None of these opportunities now exist for the public on this site.
Therefore, there are no known impacts requiring additional mitigation.
e
RGU CERu1'1CATlON. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment
Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.
I hereby certify that:
· The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
· The EA W descn"bes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than
those descn"bed in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions,
as dermed at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively.
· Co~r this EA W are bc~scnt to tbc entire EQB distribntion list
Signatur~~ ,I(~ t:;P Date ~~.3
Title ~MMU/I;? /14,~~ ~
Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at
Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality
Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN S5155, 65~-~~6:~253, orwww.mnplan.state.mn.us .
.
.
.
e.
-
04/10/2003 16:18 FAX 8905883 INSTANT TESTING/ALLIED ~002
G( 11,6, t 'lqer
ALLIE) TEST D ~ __ ~G CO '1'A \lY
7125 West 12Sth Street, SYltfiJ"500. Savage. Minnesota 55378-11030
Telephone: 952 890-5909 fa)(; 952 e90..5883
Geot&chflical Servlce$ . Commercial, Residential and Municipal
. , April 1 0, 2003
: . . ."
.. ; .
, ,
Mr. Steve R!Jssell
City of Stillwater
216 North Forth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Subject: EA W Question 19
Territorial Place
Allied Project Number 03024
Dear Mr, Russell,
Here are appropriate responses for Question 19:
19. Geologic Hazards and soli conditions
.
Part a.
AODroximate deoth (in feet\ to around water:
Minimum: 2:2 feet.
Median used as average; 4,7 feet
'Aooroximate deoth {in feen to bedrock:
Minimum: 2 feet (below fill at western end of site)
Median used as average: 7 feet, with a range of 2 feet to greater than
26.5 feet.
Geoloolc hazards te) Qroun(l ~~er;
In the southeastem part of the site. a valley cut into bedrock and naturally filled
with alluvial sands is geologically sensitive and might represent a hazard similar
to a sinkhole. Map is attached. ' .
. : . .... ....:.
..
, , '
Measures ,to :~void ofmiriiniilA n~ohlems due'lo thi~ haZard:" ,
Natural (existing) layering in the su.bsurface creates a high'vertical impedance to
downward flow of hazards, This barrier might be enhanced by placing on-site
clayey salls over the excavation base prior to the placement of fill to make grade
or to act as a tile drain.
'.
0<</10/2003 16:16 FAX 8905883
INSTANT TESTING/ALLIED
III 003
EAW Question 19
T .rritorlal Place
Allied Project Number 03024
~riI10.2003
Page 2
.. ...
.
Part b: ,
Describe the soils on th~ ~!~~-'C'lving NRSC eSCS) cJ~,~~lfigillQn. If known.
858e: Urban land - Chetel<
1039: Urban land'
, . ...
'. "'. -'"
, , ,
' "
'. .
Describe soil aranularity aDd potential for gr{\~I~~~~~r \oQ~""mination:
The urban soils are composed of granular fill soils, which cover the entire site.
The only area that underlies these soils and intervening mostly granular alluvial
fill, which has a significant potential for groundwater contamination, is identified
in part a of this question, There is little If any potential for future groundwater
contamination from the expected future use of this site. In addition, the high
vertical anisotropy of the soils could hinder vertical movement of any
contamination.
Mitiaation methods to orevent such contamination,
See paragraph In part a of this section,
.
Please call us with any questions concerning this material. Our opinions were arrived at
In accordance with generally accepted engineering practices currently in use at this
time,
ALLIED TEST DRILLING COMPANY' '.
I hQreby eertify that I am a duty Registered Professional Geologist under the laws of the
Stale of Minnesota, . , , ,
~w G: I PCj?/fj
Michael E. Schoenberg, P.G., p, Hg,
Professional Geologist, Minnesota Registration Number 41418
Project Engineer
cc: Ron Spoden, J, Buxell; Fax: 612-338-2818
.
g ~H
~ Selle: 1-. 8t1
110.
~ ~~II.aB
~
SoIIIIodng
MaIlIlodng WIll
v
.~
-
.".
<:>
<:>
~
'~\,
.~ I
CJ
"'"
.-4
II)
.-4
C?
~ Allied Test Drilling Company
~ 7n?~ WS 126th street
......
; Savage, MN 55378
0(
'II.)
~
o
~
.
.
.
04/02/2003 15:53 FAX
/' ~5eJ
1aJ002/003
G!A, h, ",... /3/ .
9535 Vadnais Center Drive, st. PlfIl, MN 55110-5196
aTrhitletUrI 111 rri1lllrillll
4... ~..
651.490.2000
'1I-uI"on.mtntal
651.49Q.2150 FAX
tr4nS}DrlIZIiQ.
Aprll2, 2003
.
\
RE: Stillwater, Minnesota
TenitorlalPlace Traffic Study. '
SEHNo~ A-STILLOIOL90J4,OO
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Still water, MN 550824807
Dear Steve:
We have reviewed the site plan for Tenitorlal Place on N~rth Main Street as requested. We
previously met with your staff and the developer relative to a number of traffic concerns which we
had with street dimensions, parking dimensions, and general circulation patterns. We have not
written a follow-up report nor have we seen any revisions since our meeting in February.
We have completed a traffic, impact study of the development, The 229 dwelling units within the.
development will generate . Cl,1J,1J.Loximately 1,700 vebicle trips per day. The commercial
development will also generate trips, but we believe that most will be trips by pedestrians who have
left their vehicles in other parking areas of the City. Some of the commercial traffic will also come
from the develvJ:o'ment residents. We believe that the maximum vehicle traffic developed in the site
from the commercial areas will be 150 trips per day.
In the AM Peak Period, we anticipate that the development will generate approximately 100
outbound trips onto North Main Street. This is a rate of slightly less than two vehicles per minute,
This should be absorbed into Main Street without any traffic problem. The major additional impact
will be at the intersection of Main Street and Chestnut Street in the downtown area, We do not
believe this will add any noticeable delay to traffic in the intersection.
, In the PM Peak Period, we anticipate there will be appro:x~ately 110 vehicles entering the cQIDplex '
and 40 vehicles exiting, from it. ,The exiting traffic, at less"than one per miriute, ,will not be
noticeable anywhere along Main Street The vehicles approaching the site will create a noticeable
left tom movement. The volume of traffic southbound on Main Street at this time is not heavy and
the northbound left turns should not create more than momentary delays. We anticipate that
al'l'oLvximately 100 of the 110 vehicles will make northbound left turns with the remaining 10
southbound right turns, The northbound traffic will come f...U.L.LL eastbound Myrtle Street, or from
northbound Main Street south of Myrtle Street" We anticipate that there will be approximately one
vehicle per minute added to northbound Main Street at Chestnut Street. This again will not be
noticeable in the PM Peak Period which is already delayed. We believe that some residents will use.
County Road 15 and County Road 12 to approach the area on Myrtle Street as an alt....u.L,,~ve route.
. .
LOCATI ON:
Short 8liott HendrlCl<Son Inc.
Your Trusted Resource · Eaual Opportunity Employer
RX TIME 04/02 '03 16:30
.
.
.
04/02/2003 16:63 FAX
III 003/003
,
Mt, Steve Russell
April 2, 2003
Page 2
... ..
The development will also generate approximately 1,000 vehicletrlps on, aSaturdaY~ Withthe
much heavier volumeso~ North ~nStIeet: onSaturdaYJthisvolume~lI be more noticeable but
will not add SUbstantially to any delays anyWhere alongthc'street.' Triiffic will be spread :out
throughout the day as opposed to weekday peak period concentrations.
We therefore believe that the additional devel"t'Auent will not create any noticeable traffic impacts
on Main Street with the exception of northbound left turns in the PM Peak: Period at the entrance.
,
If you need any additional information or specific calculations for reports. please contact us and we
will supply them. If )'ou have questions, please call us.
I
Sincerely,
SHORT:PI J lOTI HENDRICKSON INC.
~~J~
Glen VanWormer, PE
Senior Transportation Engineer
sah
"-P~IJIOIOt~...... '. ~_ce'nuoDOolOZ03.400
\
LOCATI ON :
RX TIME 04/02 '03 16:30
....
EA.t1wIT C
4., ..
. .
ASSESSMENT O~ PO!ENTIAL ElClC.I!.CTS OF IJ:1f.
PROPOSED TERRASPRlNGS DEVELOPMENT
AT l~MlNNESOTA ,TERRITORIAUSTATE PRISON (21W A96),
STILLWATER, WA~11.liiGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
.
SHPO File Number 2002-3282
Prepared by The 106 Group Ltd. for the City of Stillwater
April 2003
I. INTRODULIION
The City of Stillwater has requested an assessment of the potential effects of the proposed
TerraSprings development on all historic. archaeological and cultural resources within
the development's area of potential effect (APE) in partial fulfillment of the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W). The purpose of this study is to detennine
the presence or absence of listed National Register of Historic Places (National Register)
properties that might be affected by the undertaking. Minnesota Historic Sites Act (M.S.
138.661 - 138.6691) created a state register of historic sites. Historic sites are defined as,
properties named in the Act or listed on the National Register. The Minnesota
Territorial/State Prison Site was listed on the National Register in 1982. SHPO believes
that the surviving components of the site include the walls. the building ruins. the
archaeological resources. and the Indian Battle Ground marker and wayside rest.
, ,
.
CUucutly the proposed development property consists of vacant land surrounded by the
original stone walls of the Territorial/State Prison. All but two of the prison buildings
were dismantled between 1936 and 1939 and an arson fire reduced the two remaining
structures to ruins in September of 2002. The effects of this fire severely affected the
site. and at the time the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) indicated that the site
might be de-listed from the National Register. However. in a letter dated March 27.
2003. Dennis Gimmestad. theSHPO Government Programs and Compliance Officer.'
stated that the Minnesota Territorial/State Prison uproperty continues to meet National
Register of Historic Places (National Register) criteria. The applicable criteria are
Criterion D (archaeological significance). and possibly A (for historic associations)" (D.
Gimmestad to S. Russell. March 27.2003. on file at the SHPO).
n PROJECTDESCRWTION
The TerraSprings development consists of 227 dwelling units located within five
buildings. An additional 13.000 square feet of office/commercial space (including an e
intcJ}JJetive center) is planned. The structures include one 3-story building (#1). one 3 %_
Minnesota TenitoriaJ/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 2
.
4.,.
story building (#4), one 4 ~-story building (#2), one 5-story building (#5), and one 8 ~
story building (#3). The massing of the proposed structures is based on the original
prison plan with the exception of a c~ul..A1 green space/ruin feature and Building 3at the
west end of the fonnerprison yard Partial orcomplCtely underground.parkingis pl~ed
for each structure. Construction is limited to the7.93-acre area Within the lower prison' ,
walls. ' ,
III. METHODS
BACKGROUND REsEARCH METHODS
On April 2, 2003, background research was conducted at the Minnesota State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) for infonnation on previously identified National Register
properties within one mile (1.6 kilometer [Ian]) of the project area. The Wisconsin
National Register database was also reviewed on April 2, 2003 for resources on the east
side of the St. Croix River.
,
,
ARCHAEOLOGY AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECI'
.
The APE for archaeology is the same as the project area and includes all areas where
construction or other ground-disturbing activities related to the project might take place.. '
Based on construction plans available in April of 2003, the entire area within the lower
walls of the historic prison will be impacted by devel"'t-".aent activities.
ARCHAEOLOGY FlEW METHODS
In order to assess effects to known or suspected archaeological resources within the
project area, the proposed construction plan for the TerraSprings development was
electronically superimposed on a composite map of structure locations that have been
identified through historical or archaeological documentation (Figures 1 and 2).
ARuuu.CfURE-IIIsTORY AREA OF Puu.NTIAL E..rl!.'-I
e
, . ,
The analysis of the architectur~~history APE for the project is based on the fQIIowjng
factors in conjunction with the description of the project tindertakingand on preliminary
traffic analysis:
· land acquisition;
· changes in access to properties;
· alteration in traffic patterns;
· noticeable traffic volume increase;
· perceptible increase in noise;
· visual effects from changes in grade;
· increase in vibration;
· change in air quality; and
Minnesota TerritoriallState Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 3
"
.. ..
· change in land use and a property's setting.
.
Analysis 0/ APE Facto~
Land Acquisition
The TerraSprings development project is limited to an approximately 7.93-acre parcel of
land located on North Main Street in Stillwater. The parcel corresponds to the historic
prison grounds located within a natural hollow that is bound on the north, west, and south
by steep, high bluffs. These bluffs and the surviving historic walls of the prison mark the
north and south boundaries of the property, while the west boundary extends to North
Second Street and the eastern boundary is marked by Main Street. Development is
planned within the open land bounded by the innermost walls of the former prison. No
additional land acquisition for this project is anticipated.
"
Change in Access to Properties
Historically, the main access to the Minnesota TerritoriaVState Prison property was
through a gate off of Stillwater's Main Street. This entrance corresponds to the current
southerly access into the property. A second entrance, through which railcars entered the
prison property, was located at the northeast comer of the prison yard. This access .
corresponds to the CUucut northern entrance into the property that provides access to the
historic wayside marker. The proposed access route to the TerraSprings development is a
central entrance located to the north of the original main prison entrance. This access
route forks into two separate roads that funnel traffic to the north and south of the former
twine and shoe shop locations along roadways that existed within the historic prison.
Access to surrounding properties will not be altered during the development of the
TerraSprings project.
Alterations in Traffic Patterns
While the existing traffic patterns along Stillwater's Main Street will remain largely
unchanged, ,the new entrance to the TerraSprings development is located immediately,
opposite the' entrance to the Stillwater Depot Logging and Railroad Museum, which is '
, ,home to the Minnesota Zephyr excursion train. The train runs daily at 11 :30 AM and '
6:30 PM (5:30 on Sunday). The develv}'ment of the TerraSprings entrance will create a
new intersection along this portion of Main Street. A traffic impact study for the
develv}'ment completed by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH), notes that during the
PM Peak Period there will be "a noticeable left turn movement" at this intersection, but
this traffic "should not create more than momentary delays" (G. VanWormer to S,
Russell, April 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater).
e
Minnesota TenitoriaJ/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 4
.
Noticeable Traffic Volume and Noise i~~reases
.
Along the Main Street corridor, increases in traffic (average volumes as well as increases
in bus traffic and/or speed) will detenninenoise impacts to adjacent residences. ,tn
' general,if sound energy is doubled (i.e., the amount of traffic doubles), there isa ,3.;
decibel increase in noise, which is just barely noticeable to most people. A 20 perCent
increase in traffic noise can result in an increase in noise of one decibel, which would be
imperceptible to most people. Up until two years ago the prison site was use as a bus
storage facility that generated a lot of bus traffic and associated noise. It is estimated that
the development will generate approximately 1,700 vehicle trips per day associated with
the residential portion of the development and 150 trips per day from the commercial
portion (G. VanWormer to S. Russell, April 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater).
It is not known what percentage this number of vehicle trips would increase the overall
traffic volume on Main Street. It is noted, though, that the vehicular traffic associated
with the site during the AM' and PM Peak Periods "should be absorbed into Main Street
without any traffic problem" and "will not be noticeable anywhere along Main Street"
(G. VanWormer to S. Russell, April 2, 2003, on file with the City of Stillwater). Based
on these results, it is anticipated that traffic volumes would increase by less than 50
percent. Noise levels are therefore not likely to increase by 3 decibels. The APE for the
project could conservatively include the first row of properties closest to development in
order to account for any possible impact from increased traffic volume and noise on those
...uperties.
Visual Efficts
The proposed TerraSprings development consists of one 3-story building (# 1), one 3 Y:z-
story building (#4), one 4 ~-story building (#2), one 5-story building (#5), and one 8 ~
story building (#3). These buildings vary in height from 45 ft. to 95 ft. with the tallest
building located at the west end of the property. The main cellblock buildings and
associated shops of the historic prison were predominately three-story buildings with
four-story tower accents, while the other buildings within the prison grounds were on~-
and two-story Structures.
A site visit to the project area revealed that, because the development ...u...... rt is l<?Cated
within a natural hollow that is presently well-screened by trees to the south and west,'
visual impacts are limited to those properties immediately adjacent to the project area to
the north or south, or those that could view the proposed development through the open
east end of the hollow.
Increase in Vibration
e
The TerraSprings development project will not result in a perceptible increase in ground
vibration except during the construction phase.
Minnesota TerritoriaJ/State Prison
Assessment ofEft'ects
Page 5
Change in Air Quality
~/,. ..
.
Change in air quality is not expected to exceed state standards and, therefore, is nota
contributing factor in determining the APE; ,
Impacts to Land Use and a Property's Setting
Currently the proposed development property consists of vacant land surrounded by the
original stone walls of the Territorial/State Prison. All but two of the original prison
buildings were dismantled between 1936 and 1939. An arson fire reduced the remaining
two structures to ruins in September of 2002. A wayside rest and historical marker
constructed in 1939/40 are located in the northeast portion of the property. The proposed
land use is primarily residential with some office/commercial and will impact the same
proportion of the property as the historic prison. Most of the proposed development
structures share footprints with original prison buildings and are of a similar scale,
thereby maintaining the structural density of the prison. The only exception to this
general development plan is a central green space/ruin feature and Building 3 at the west
end of the former prison yard.
"
APE Summary
Based on the above-mentioned factors, the architecture-history APE for the TerraSprings, , .
project is generally defined as all' of the first tier or adjacent properties that may be
impacted by visual and noise effects. The boundaries for the APE were expanded in
areas where properties may be affected by changes in access, visual effects, and/or
additional increased levels of noise. Because the development property is located within
a natural hollow that is presently well-screened by trees to the south and west, visual
impacts are limited to those properties immediately adjacent to the project area to the
north or south, and those that are in view of the proposed development through the open
east end of the hollow. The resulting study area for architecture-history contains three
National Register listed pl'uperties: the ,Minnesota Territorial/State Prison, the Minnesota
Territorial Prison Warden's House, and the Stillwater Bridge.
IV. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS " '
ARCHAEOLOGY
In June of 2002, The 106 Group prepared an archaeological resources overview for the
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison property (Terrell 2002a). Extensive site-specific
archival research using historical photographs, maps, and additional primary materials
was completed for, and is summarized in, this report. Particular attention was given to
evidence for the location and design of the original territorial prison buildings that were _
tom down in 1871. Based on the results of this study, The 106 Group recommended a _
Phase II archaeological evaluation of the prison should occur because of the high
Minnesota TenitoriallState Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 6
.
" "
potential for the area to contain intact archaeological deposits that could answer
important research questions per National Register Criterion D and the potential to
uncover deposits eligible under Criterion A. Dr. Scott Anfinson, SHPO National
Register Archaeologist, concurred with these results during a meeting on July 10, 2002;
.
During August and September of 2002, The 106 Group conducted a Phase IT
archaeological evaluation of the Minnesota Territorial/State Prison (Terrell 2002b). The
archaeological evaluation of the site demonstrated that the entire project area contains
intact archaeological resources including those that date back to the earliest territorial
period. In particular, the interior and exterior foundations of all of the major structures
on the property documented on the 1884 and later Sanborn fire insurance maps survive.
In addition, the excavation revealed a portion of the original 1853 stone wall that
surrounded the territorial prison and a foundation possibly associated, with a pre-1877
dwelling that was located to the west of the original prison. The 106 Group
recommended that these foundations are eligible for the National Register under Criterion
A for their association with the development of the Minnesota TerritoriaVState Prison
system and are therefore contributing elements to the National Register-listed site. The
survival of these foundations and their associated features, such as curbing and sidewalks,
indicates that archaeological features, such as privies, wells, and trash pits, while not
encountered during this survey, may also survive on the site. Such resources would be
considered eligible for the National Register under Criterion D for their potential to
answer significant research questions about the prison. In a letter dated March 27, 2003,
Dennis Gimmestad, the SHPO Government Programs and Compliance Officer, stated
that the Minnesota TerritoriaVState Prison "property continues to meet National Register
of Historic Places (National Register) criteria. The applicable criteria are Criterion D
(archaeological significance), and possibly A (for historic associations)" (D. Gimmestad
to S. Russell, March 27, 2003, on file at the SHPO).
ARCHITECTURE-HISTORY
The City of Stillwater has numerous National Register properties, including the Stillwater
Commercial Historic District. Three listed National Register properties are located
within the architecture-history APE: the Minnesota TerritoriaVState Prison, the
Minnesota Territorial Prison Warden's House, and the Stillwater Bridge."
v. SUMMARY OF E1414.1!.CTS AND PROPOSED 1\'llllGATION MEASURES
MINNESOTA TERRITORIAL/STATE PRIsON
e
Property Description
The Minnesota Territorial/State Prison is significant as the site of the original territorial
prison (1853-1858) and subsequent state prison (1859-1914). The "prison site, walls, and
remaining buildings" were listed on the National Register in 1982. At the time of the
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 7
nomination, the former shoe factory, r~built after an 1884 fire, and an associated leather
and twine .storage facility, built c. 1895, were still standing. The other prison buildings
had been dismantled between 1936 and 1939. In September of 2002, an arson fire
reduced the two remaining Structures to ruins. The upper and lower limestone block:':
Walls surrounding the property were constructed by conVict 'labor between 1871 and.
1892. The prison walls and the ruins of the former shoe shop and the leather and twine
storage building are the only above-ground resources remaining at the site from the
prison period. The archaeological evaluation of the site in 2002 demonstrated that the
entire prison yard contains intact archaeological resources including those that date back
to the earliest territorial period (Terrell 2002b). The foundations of many of the former
structures are also visible on the ground surface. Despite the fire in the fall of 2002, the
site continues to meet National Register criteria.
.
Description of Effects
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison Historic Property
As a result of the TerraSprings development there is an overall adverse effect to the
historical associations and nature of the property (National Register Criterion A). The
loss of this integrity as a result of the development, may lead to the removal of the site
from the National Register. .
Archaeology
The planned TerraSprings development, associated grading, and utility work will impact
the entire historic prison yard and will therefore destroy archaeological deposits
throughout the property that were demonstrated in the Phase IT archaeological evaluation
to include intact foundations and features dating back to the territorial period (Figures 1
and 2).
Walls
The CUu,"ut devet"f'ouent plan calls for the City of Stillwater to retain ownership of the
prison walls. The City plans to 'rehabilitate the walls'through cleaning and tuck-pointing. ,,'
An apPlvximately 100-ft. long section of the wall located in the northwest comer of the
property has failed. This section will be rebuilt in front of the original location and a crib
and drainage system will be installed behind the new wall section. Salvaged stone will be
used to create a new wall that will, as near as possible, match the original wall in
appearance. During construction the walls will be exposed to vibrations from equipment
and construction activities.
.
.
Minnesota TerritoriaJ/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 8
.
Ruins
~."
Portions of the walls of the fonner shoe shop and the leather and twine storage building
survived the fire. The TerraSprings development will incorporate the walls of the leather' .
and twine storage building into the fa~ade'of Building 4, and utilizethe,rernainsofthe
fonner shoe shop as a landscape feature. ," " .
Proposed Mitigation Measures
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison Historic Property
As a result of the TerraSprings development, much of the historical associations of the
prison property will be lost and the site may be removed from the National Register. To
mitigate this effect, it is recommended that an interpretive program be developed for the
property. An intel}11t'.ave space in Building 1 and an interpretive trail are planned aspects
of the TerraSprings development. Other aspects of this program might include a web
site, article, public presentation, book, and/or documentary film. The Washington
County Historical society should be an active participant in the development of the
interpretive program, if they so wish.
.
The existing marker, wayside, and associated landscaping elements are not fonnally
listed on the National Register, though the SHPO considers them eligible for listing. _ The ,
wayside and maker should be' formally documented (photographs and measured
drawings) prior to their removal. As the marker is constructed of stone from the fonner
prison buildings, it is recommended that as much of the original fabric and general
appearance of the marker be retained at its new location. SHPO has requested that
because the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS) was one of the original sponsors of the
marker, Tim Glines of the MHS marker/wayside program should be consulted regarding
its future treatment
Archaeology
As the archaeological remains of the TerritoriaVState Prison are considered a contributing
element to the National Register property, and as the proposed TerraSprings develvt'~ent .
will destroy archaeological deposits thfoughout the property the folloWing mitigation
measures are proposed:
e
Data Recoverv: A Phase ill, full-scale, archaeological mitigation to take place in
the southeast portion of the prison yard where the earliest deposits associated with
the territorial-period prison are located (Figure 2). As no maps or images of the
original prison survive, archaeology is the only means by which to learn about the
original territorial prison. This excavation would last approximately three weeks
and would focus on salvaging as much archaeological data as possible from the
territorial period before the site is destroyed.
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 9
#..
Construction Monitoring: As the remainder of the prison yard and its
development is largely documented, only monitoring of construction activities in
other portions of the yard is recommended. The goal of the monitoring is to
record the location of undocumented features such as privies, wells, and trash pits, '
or .' previously unrecorded structures., 'Monitoring would only occur during site . ,
preparation and utility trenching activities.
.
72-Hour Emenzencv Recoverv Plan: In the event that a significant undocumented
archaeological feature, such as a privy or well, is encountered during the
construction monitoring, it is recommended that a 72-hour emergency recovery
plan be implemented. This plan allows for cordoning off the location of the
feature and permits its excavation and documentation prior to its destruction by
site clearing and construction.
Walls
"
An original portion of the wall will be replaced because it has failed and is in need of
repair. The wall needs to be moved out to protect the slope from further erosion and
vegetation removal. The damaged wall section should be docwnented (photographs)
prior to its alteration. The City of Stillwater has consulted with Charles Nelson, SHPO
Historical. Architect, regarding the replacement of the wall section. While he would,
prefer the reconstruction of the wall at its original location, he supports' the creation of a
stone wall just it! front of the original location that will, as nearly as possible, match the
original in appearance, and include salvaged stone.
.
During construction the walls should be monitored by a structural engineer for impacts
from vibrations or machinery. It is also recommended that the walls and their associated
features, such as the guardhouses be stabilized and maintained and included in the
inte.lp.lc,tive program.
Ruins
As the remaining portions of the walls of the former shoe shop and the leather and twine
$torage building will be preserved within ',the proposed TerraSpring design plan, no'
mitigation measures are proposed. The IlI:inS, though,' should be incorporated into the
interpretation program.
MINNEsOTA TERRITORIAL/STATE PRIsON WARDEN'S HOUSE
Property Description
The Minnesota TerritoriaVState Prison Warden's House was constructed of locally .
quarried stone between 1851 and 1853. The present wood frame addition is one of
Minnesota TerritoriaJ/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 10
.
..',
several added during the building's history and the current version was finalized about
1910. The house is significant as the orilyremaining structure of the territorial prison and
the only principal structure left of the state prison institution at Stillwater. The building's
period of significance is 1853-1914, which corresponds to the prison's period of ,
occupation.' The buildi~g's areas of significance are architecture,social/humanitarlan,'
and prison management and it was listed on the National Register in 1974.
.
Description of Effects
The most notable effects to the Warden's House will be to the visibility of the property
and the view from the property. Building 1 of the proposed development, a three-story
residential building, with 7,000 s.t: of commercial/interpretive space, is planned to the
immediate north of the wall separating the warden's house from the prison grounds.
Building 1 is located in the area of the original main prison house and cell block (1853-
1871), which was a 3-story (25-ft. high) stone building. This building was replaced by a
3-story prison cell block (1872) and administration building (1879) with later cell block
additions. There will be no change to the property itself and there are no anticipated
changes in local traffic (street alternations, traffic patterns, traffic volumes, accessibility,
or parking). A traffic study by SEH concluded that traffic "will not be noticeable
anywhere along Main Street" (G. VanWormer to S. Russell, April 2, 2003, on file with
the City of Stillwater). As the development property is currently vacant, there will also
be some increase in noise associated with the occupation of the TerraSprings
development. During construction the building will be exposed to vibrations from
equipment and construction activities.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
The Warden's House should be monitored by a structural engineer during construction
for effects from the increased vibrations. The Washington County Historical Society,
which is housed in the Warden's House, should be informed of potential impacts
resulting from construction and should be consulted regarding potential effects to the
property.
The SHPO believes that the presence of the new development,will have an adverse effect ,
on the Warden's House~ Part of the mitigation for this property could be the re-writing of ,',
the National Register nomination for the Warden's House to include a better context,
boundaries, and possibly the prison walls.
e
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison
Assessment of Effects
Page 11
STILLWATER BRIDGE
. >.
Property Description
. , . '.. ..'. . "
The Stillwater Bridge issigriificantas a rare surviViri.g example of a: vertical-lift bridge '"
construction of the Waddell and Harrington type. The vertical-lift bridge was completed
in 1931 and listed on the National Registerin 1989.
Description of Effects
The only anticipated effect to the bridge is a change in the view from the property. From
the bridge Buildings 1 and 5 of the proposed TerraSprings development will be visible.
Building 1 is the same number of stories as the former prison building that was located in
the southeast portion of the prison grounds. Building 5 is three stories taller than the
former foundry complex that was located in the northeast comer of the former prison
grounds, but the estimated 60-ft. height of the building will not rise above the 80-ft.
height of the bluff to the immediate north of the prison property. Therefore, as viewed
from the bridge, the TerraSprings development will visually fill the area occupied by the
former prison at the time of the bridge's construction in 1931. The new development, as
viewed from the bridge, will also blend with the general topography of this section of
town.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
It is recommended that the effect to the view from the Stillwater Bridge is minimal and
therefore no treatment options are proposed.
REFERENCES LJ.J..I!.D
Terrell, M M. ,
2002a " Archaeological ,ResOUrces Overview' for theA{jnnesota', Territorial/St(Jte,
Prison, Stillwater, Washington Countj, Minnesota. Prepared for J. Boxell
Architecture Ltd. and The Sweeney Group. On file at the Minnesota State
Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul and with the City of Stillwater.
2002b Phase 1/ Archaeological Evaluation of Site 21WA96, the Minnesota
Ten'itoria//State Prison, Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. Prepared for
Territorial Place, LLC. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation
Office, St. Paul and with the City of Stillwater.
.
"
.
.
'I
L
"-
II I. III I
-..--.-.-......
L
"~ I \ If 11/ VI( (
.. II '
~ r. J. ~~, ;t.~
ell :-:J:1!t...~
"' :i: I ~r}i}~~~' )&
CD a t
0
...
'~
KEY
~mr.mm
i/'l\~'<!l,f~ Fonner Strudures
Extant Prison Wans
Development plans
C OrIgInal Tenilotlal ~rlson Area
, .(1811301887) , ' '
Proposed Buildings ,
Minnesota Territorial/State Prison Project
Assessment o'f Potentia I Ef'f'ects
Washington County, Minnesota
Proposed Development Over I ay
o
100
200
300
40~eet
@
Figure 2
.
.
.
.
.
.
Wood Fence
(c.1877 '0.1890)
Inner wall Completed
1>)'1892 \ _
&o,'e,. ~Oo", ,
"'''''7:'' StO".f/a P. ' .
· 'e, 769.JII(:I1Itia.
KEY
I
.
I Fonner SlIUctu188
. 0rIII1n81 TerrItOrIal PrIson Nea
(1853 -1867)
Extant Prison Walls
Leathe r
and .............
Twine ~
Storage
(c. 1895, Present)
Hot AIr KII n ",
(e. 18,'1 'c, 1888)
,
,
,
,
, Greenhou....
I(e. 1898,0. 1910)-'
, '
"
: ,
,\
,
,
,
"
\
"
\
,
'--..--
CrIMIna' r.
"FlsaneWard
(1903'18%4)
<IJ
r
L
<IJ
en
S
I
/
,,,,-,'_,.,~r.' "" ,,~,.,"" ,,', ~"'''om...nY'1884 1888 1891 1898.1904,1910 1924.1958.1981
Minnesota Terrltorla I / State Prison ProJec~
Assessment of' Potentia I Ef'f'ects
Washington Coun~y, Minnesota
o
100
200
300
Former Structure Locations
40~eet @ Figure 1
.
.
.
1(1'
\10, ~F
GyI1, h,,/-'I13 II
/1~ AI/) (7 T - /
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County 'Road 82
Roseville, MN 55113
May 22, 2003
'. ,
Steve Russell
Community Develvpu.lent Director
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
SUBJECT: Terra Springs, MnlDOT Review #EA W03-008
SW Quad ofTH 95 and Elm Street
Stillwater, Washington County
Control Section 8210
Dear Mr. Russell:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnIDOT) has reviewed the above
referenced Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W). MnlDOT also identified the
following issues in our letter dated May 15, 2003 during the review of the plat for Terra
Springs. Please address the following issues before any further development:
/
· The proposal will require a righttum lane for southbound TH 95. The proposed on-
street parking bump outs will not be allowed. The entrance radii should be revised to a
30-foot radius and the divided concrete throat entering the site should be moved
farther to the west away from TH 95. The site plan will need to be resubmitted
addressing these comments. Please contact Wayne Lemaniak, in Mn/DOT's Traffic
section, at (651) 634-2147 with questions concerning these issues.
1-
· A MnlDOT Drainage permit will be required. The proposed develvpment will need to
maintain existing drainage rates (i.e" the rate at which storm water is discharged from
the site must not increase). The project developer will need to submit before/after
hydraulic computations for both 1 0 and 1 OO-year rainfall events verifying that all
existing drainage patterns and systems affecting MnlDOT right of way will be
perpetuated. Please direct questions concerning these issues to Steve Christensen
(651)634-2415 ofMnlDOT's Water Resources section.
J
· MnlDOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between
land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in
complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise
standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Deveh..pment, arid the U.S. Department of
Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.003.0 states that municipalities are responsible
for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land ,use activities listed in the MPCA's
An equal opportunity employer
- ..
Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would .
result in violations of established iioise standards.
Mn/DOT policy regarding develv}o'ment adjacent to existing highways prohibits the
expenditure of highway funds , for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The
project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed
necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions
regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at
(651) 582-1293.
if
· State Historic Preservation Officer clearance will be required for the Indian
Battlefield monument in order to determine impacts to this site. Dennis Gimmestad
would be a contact for clearance information (651) 296-5462.
As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity
such as plats and site plans to:
Paul Czech
MnlDOT - Metro Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and.
two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three
(3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a
submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's review and response to development
proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary
number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return. incomplete
submittals.
If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at (651)
582-1378
S inCerelY'~. '
~. .,'
. ,
~ ,
Yrigid Gombold '
Senior Transportation Planner
Copy: Joe Lux / Washington County
Sandra Cullen / Washington County
Brian Sweeney / Frauenshus Sweeney
Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council
MnlDOT Division File CS 8210
MnlDOT LGL File - Stillwater
.
.
r' A\; ~'~,jTV'.,.,\
ifJ;.~~ ~ .' ~,_. '...
~ II l.i
~~~
~h,t"f-"I3"
/hpc,,4-- L
Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc~
'..
May 28, 2003
Via Facsimile
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Stillwater Community Develv}JiUent Department
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Comments on the Terra Springs Development Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EA W)
"
Dear Mr. Russell:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has had an opportunity to review the Terra
Springs Development EA W for the proposed residential development located in Stillwater,
Minnesota. The primary issue of concern in the EA W is related to sewer services.
.
#1
It appears that the project will connect to the existing sewer system in the city of Stillwater. If the
project will include additional flow in excess of what the current prison sewer system provides,
the city of Stillwater will need to apply for a sewer extension permit from the MPCA and
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. The existing sewer system flow capacity at this
site and the proposed flow capacity should be included in the EA W. This should include the
design flow numbers, not just that they are going to connect to the sewer.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (651) 297-1788.
Sincerely,
~k5?~
James E. Sullivan '
Project Manager
Environmental Review Unit
Regional Environmental Management Division
JES:mln
cc: Gregg Downing, EQB, St. Paul
MPCA EPRO File
.
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (651) 296-6300 (Voice); (651) 282-5332 (TTY)
St. Paul · Brainerd · Detroit Lakes · Duluth · Mankato · Marshall · Rochester . Willmar; www.pca.state.mn.us
Equal Opportunity Employer. Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20% fibers from paper recycled by consumers,
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Building communities that work
C'i /1 ,'h 10/-"/3'/. '
/11,c f" UJtt n uA - 3 .
May 28, 2003
"
. .
..
Steve Russell
Community Development Director,
City of Stillwater
216 N.4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Terra Springs Mixed Use Development
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W)
Metropolitan Council District 12 (Chris Georgacas, 651-292-8062)
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 18930-1
Dear Mr. Russell:
Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the Terra Springs Mixed Use Development
Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Council staff has reviewed this EA W to determine both
its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns and its potential for significant
environmental impact. In addition to the EA W, both a hydrologic and a subsurface exploration
document were reviewed.
, , .
It is Council staffs understanding that the project is a proposed infill development on an .
approximately 8-acre site at the north eq.q. of Stiliwater' s' Main Street. It is the site of the , former
Territorial Prison recently destroyed by a ~rr~: ;Themix~d~tise developinenfwill consist of227 '
attached residential units in five buildings, approximat~ly 13,000 sq~are feet of retail space, a' .:
green courtyard, and an interpretive trail ~round the perimeter ofthe site.
Council staff has determined that the EA W fails to discuss many proposed aspects of the
building site and project that may potentially affect the environment in this vicinity. With
respect to regional concerns, Council staff finds that the EA W is complete and accurate and
raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional
purposes, the RGU should consider the following comments prior to rendering a negative
declaration for the proposed project.
.If/
Item 6 Descriotion , " , ,
The EA W states that buildings proposed to be constructed on the site may be constructed as high ,
as 90 feet. The "Cooperative Management Plan" (CMP) for the Lower Saint Croix National
Scenic Riverway identifies Stillwater as a "river town." Additionally, the north end of town to
the train station is identified as "small town," The CMP guidelines state that 'new or expanded
structures are to meet the following maximum height requirements: 45 feet in the river town
.district, and 35 feet in the sm~ll ~own 4istoI1c ,and small town districts.' The height is to be
measured from the average ground 'elevation to the upperm~st point 'of each proposed Structure
, on the, site., The record of decision,docuni~nt needs, to discuss 'the CMP criteria, oif they have "
been endorsed by the City, City ord'inance ~uil(ling height ,restrictions; and document the" " '",,:, .
maximum structure height limitations that will be in effect for thIS' proposed project.: , .'
www,metrocouncll,org
230 East Fifth Street . St, Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 . (651) 602-1000 . Fax 602-1550 . TlY 291.0904
Metro Info Une 602-1888
An Equal OrJoortunUu Emnln, IPr
.
.jJI,
Jt]
.
f;';~
d:l5
M'v
.
Steve Russell
May 28, 2003
Page 2
'"
Item 8 Permits andApDrovals Reauired
Sanitary sewer service connection plans for the proposed projectwillneedto be submitted to
both the MinnesotaPollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the MetropolitanCouncil '.
Environmental Services, Municipal Services stafffor review, comment, and issuance ofa
construction permit. This must be completed before connection can be made to either the
municipal or metropolitan wastewater disposal system.
Significant volumes of ground water are proposed to be discharged to the Saint Croix River from
this site during both the construction and post-construction phases of the proposed project. The
proposal will most likely require a ground water appropriation permit from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. The proposed project will also require a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System construction erosion control permit from the MPCA.
Item 12 Pltvsical Impacts on Water Resources,
Inadequate information has been included in the EAW to describe how the proposed project will
deal with the significant volume of surface and ground water that will need to be diverted off the
site, if it is constructed as currently proposed. The site hydrologic exploration document states
that portions of the site are proposed to be excavated to a depth often feet below the existing
grade to accommodate lower level parking in the structures. The documents further state that
this action would require permanent de-watering of the site, which could generate in excess of
300,000 gallons of runoff per day. The impacts ofthis proposed action on both the site and
adjacent Saint Croix River have not been adequately addressed in the EA W, including the
proposed outfall location, its design, and the permits that will be necessary.
Item 13 Water Use
Inadequate information has been included in the EA W to describe the extent of de-watering, both
temporary (during construction) and permanent, that will be necessary for the project as it is
currently designed. The EA W currently states that no de-watering will be necessary for the
proposed project, which is incorrect according to the hydrologic exploration document for the
site.
Item 14 Water-related Land Use Manaf!e District
Inadequate information has been included in the EA W to det~rmine if adequate separation (to meet local codes) will
be present between the lowest floor elevation in the proposed buildings (if some are constnicted' approximately ten
feet below existing grade) and the IOO-year flood plain elevation for the Saint Croix River in the vicinity of the site.
The fInal document should include information indicating the planned lowest floor elevation of proposed buildings
on the site, as well as the existing IOO-year flood elevation at the site,
Item 17 Water Oualitv-Surface Water Runoff,
The EA W states that development of the site as proposed will both improve the water quality and
decrease the quantity of storm water runoffthat will leave the site from its current undeveloped
state. The EA W further states that this will be achieved through the use of on-site storm water
detention facilities and storm water treatment trains; rain gardens and grass swales; permeable
paving stone, sump catch basins, and underground treatment structures and sand filter drain
2
Steve Russell
May 28, 2003
Page 3
"
I,
.
fields. The presence of both ground water and bedrock near the surface on much of the site may
preclude the use of many ofthe proposed storm water minimization and treatment techniques.
The finding of fact and record of decision documents will need to address the appropriateness of
theproP9sal to utilize the identified methods inlight of the known site constraints. '
j/1
Item 19 Geolo!!ic Hazards and Soil Conditions
The Minnesota Geological Survey 'Sensitivity of Ground Water Systems to Pollution' map
identifies the entire site for this proposed project as having a "very high" pollution sensitivity
rating.
$5
Item 25 Nearbv Resources-Reeional Trails
The Washington County Parks Department completed the Lakes Links Trail Network Master
Plan in 2001. The Metropolitan Council has since approved the master plan. The portion of the
master plan "Highway 96-Segment 13 of 13" discusses a regional trail or regional trail
connection from the Highway 96 corridor into downtown Stillwater. It appears that the trail may "
be on the east side of the road and would not affect the proposed development. Ifthe trail is
developed on the west side ofthe road, however, the proposed development should
accommodate it. Wherever the trail is ultimately developed it is important to provide safe and
convenient pedestrian and bicycle access between the proposed development and the future trail.
This concludes the' Council's review of the EA W. The Council will take no formal action.. If
you have any questions, need further information, or would like to meet with staff to discuss the
groundwater issues noted above, please contact Bob Mazanec, principal reviewer, at 651-602-
1330 or bob.mazanec@metc.state.mn.us.
.
Si
Phyllis' anson, Manager
Office of Planning and Technical Assistance
Cc: Chris Georgacas, Metropolitan Council District 12 ,
Bob Mazanec, Sector Representative, Office of Planning and Technical Assistance
Cheryl Olson, Referrals Coordinator, Office of Planning and Technical Assistance
Wayne Barstad, DNR Metro, 1200 Werner Road, Saint Paul
Keith Cherryholmes, MPCA, 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul
V:\REVIEWS\Communities\Stillwater\Letters\Stillwater 2003 EA W Terra Springs 18930-1 ,doc
.
3
&ft, hI !-p/'
.
".11
MHS- Y
May 23, 2003
MINl\"ESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Directory
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: EAW - Terra Springs Mixed Use Development
T30 R20 S28 N-NE, Stillwater, Washington County
SHPO Number: 2003-2011
Dear Mr. Russell:
Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment
Worksheet for the above-referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to
responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites
Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in '
Minnesota Rules 4410.1600.
"
.
As you know, the Territorial/State Prison property in Stillwater is listed on the National
Register of Historic Places. In addition, the listed property includes a roadside parking
area/marker, built by the National Youth Administration (NYA) in 1939-40, which also
meets National Register criteria.
The fire that severely damaged the two surviving prison buildings last year was certainly
tragic. However, even with the diminishment of these two elements of the property, we
have concluded that the essential historical integrity of the property has remained intact
(see our letter of 27 March 2003).
The site's current eligibility - essentially, its ability to convey its historical associations - is
largely based on the strong physical context created by the geography of the site and
the iargely intact prison walls, on the intact archaeological resources, and on the lack of,
new development on the site. Unfortunately, we have concluded that the proposed
intensive development of the site will compromise its integrity to the pointwhereitiio
longer quaHfiesfor the National Register. The most significant elements thatleaqto this
determination are the potential loss of much of the archaeological material and the
overwhelming preponderance of new construction that will be present when the project
is complete.
.
It is regrettable that it has not been possible to develop a future for the property that
would preserve its archaeological resources, open space, and historic eligibility.
However,if the proposed development's adverse effect on the historic property cannot
be avoided, it should be mitigated. We have the following comments on suitable
mitigation:
HI
1. The Phase III archaeological data recovery described in Exhibit C of the EAW
is a suitable approach to mitigation of effects to the archaeological resources.
:\1.') ~pllo)!)! BOld,'\anl \\;'~l/:::ainl Paul. \Iinll('~ota 5,,)102-1906/Tdephone 651-296-6126
'1J, 1.-
YJ
J/~
:JJ,
cc:
2. The documentation on the tiN A roadside parking area that was gathered as
part of the MnDOT survey of historic roadside development structures provides
an adequate record of this historic property for mitigation purposes. Any efforts
to continue to interpret the Indian battle that is discussed at this marker should be
coordinated with Tim Glines, coordinator for historic markers here at the
Minnesota Historical Society. We note that the MnDOT inventory indicates that '
the stone used in the construction of this roadside area was salvaged from an
original stone prison building, which was demolished by the NYA.
3. Even though the prison property will lose its National Register eligibility, we
agree that the continuing presence of the overall site, including the stone walls
and the adjacent warden's house, creates a good opportunity for interpretation. It
is important that the content of this interpretation is carefully considered by
qualified historians, and that the methods of interpretation are adequately funded
at the outset and are designed to be sustainable for the future.
4. The analysis of effects on the adjacent Warden's House, listed separately on
the National Register, should be carefully reviewed with the Washington County
Historical Society, the house's occupant. Potential construction related
disturbance and future parking needs for both the housing development and the
society should be addressed. The new construction will also have a significant
effect on the historic setting of the Warden's House. As indicated in the EAW,
appropriate mitigation might include an update of the National Register
nomination documentation on the Warden's House, including a boundary
analysis and a description of contributing resources. Inclusion of a portion of the
adjacent prison wall may be appropriate.
5. Other historic properties in the vicinity include the Stillwater Lift Bridge and the
Stillwater Commercial Historic District, both of which are listed on the National
Register. The site is also within the Stillwater Cultural Landscape District, which
has been determined to be a historic urban St. Croix River landscape. Although
the new construction would be visible from or within portions of these properties,
it is not anticipated that the effect would be adverse.
In summary, the proposed development will have an adverse effect on a historic
resource of statewide importance. If avoidance is not achieved, completion of thorough
mitigation is important. '
Contact us at651-296-5462 with questions or concerns.
SlS::-i ~~
Britta L. Bloomberg
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
Sue Fitzgerald, Stillwater HPC
Brent Peterson, Washington County Historical Society
Anne Ketz, The 106 Group
Tim Glines, MHS
Jackie Sluss, MnDOT
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ma~ 08 03 12:06p
Frauenshuh Co
651-224-6822
p.2
. ,
-Filtl t'l ((If
~;. ..
May 5, 2003
Mr. Howard Lieberman
Chainnan - Heritage Preservation Commission
City &11- 216 No 4th'St
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Howard:
It was a pleasure speaking with you, last week.
\
To follow up on our discussion, I wanted to reiteratcthe Terra Springs development team's firm
commitment to preserving as much of the historic nature of the former ~..;~rial site as possible,
within the context of'the Terra Springs development.
To that end, we envision tlte following:
1) Restore, repair, and preserve the limestone wall that surrounds the site.
2) Developing an Int..........:tivc Center within BuDding ##1 on the southwest co{l1er of the site
and f~turing what has been identified by archeology consultants as the most significant
archeological feature on the site - the walls oftbe original prison building.
3) Developing an L'~".l:'retive Trail along the wall around the parameter of the entire site.
4) Developing an archeological green that includes the ruin walls of the factory and
warehouse buildings which were burned down last September.
S) "Capturing" within the architecture of the buildings of the site~ features of the original
territorial buildings.
6) Contracting with a registered state archeologist to consult with the developers,
construction team. and the City 10 ensure we are proceeding within the api'.vl" :ate
historic framework including ensuring any significant historical "find" during the pre-
construction development can be ......l-'crly addressed.
As we discussed. developing a. Terra Springs Working'Group that woujdbelp craft the above, .'
products makes a lot of sense. We ta1kecl' about ensuring representation from the HPe, citY staff,
and the development team.
\
180 east 5th street, suite 160.. saint paul, minnesota 55101
phone: 651.291-3591- fax: 651.223.5652
t1a~ 08 03 12:06p
Frauenshuh Co
651-224-6822
., .
A first blush effort at picking a working gr~lip might inclu6e the following: Roger Tomten, Brent
Peterson. Steve Russell; Sue Fit...6.....;Jd. Jac:l< Buxell. as well as you and me. I'd like to
recommend that we have the group's first meeting in the next few weeks.
Again, Tena Spri."1gS LLC looks forward to' worldngwitbyouand,the HPGto develop one of the
state'srnost remarkable'historicahites~ ' " ' , ;'
Bri Sweeney
President
Tena Springs LLC
p.3
.
"
.
.
f
'REv'iSEb' 0--2'-0::5
1> c t::>
~1 .::.::>f'., .
.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE TERRA
SPRINGS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has duly prepared an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Terra Springs Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City has received and responded to comments on the EAW; and
WHEREAS, the City has duly prepared a Record of Decision, which is attached
as "Exhibit A".
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Stillwater, Minnesota:
.
1 , The Record of Decision for Terra Springs is hereby accepted and
approved.
2. A negative declaration for the Terra Springs Planned Unit
Development Environmental Assessment is ordered and an
Environmental Impact Statement shall not' be required.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, MN this 3rd day of June
2003,
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
"
Exhibit A
"
City of Stillwater
Record of Decision
Terra Springs PUD EA W
.
1. Background
The Terra Springs PUD is a 227 unit mixed use attached single family
development with 9000 sq feet of retail space and 4000 sq feet of office space in
the City of Stillwater. A mandatory EA W was required under Minnesota rules
4410.4300 Subpart 31. The City of Stillwater is the RGU and prepared an EA W
according to EQB rules, with assistance from the 106 group. Notice of
availability of the EA W was published in the EQB monitor on April 28, 2003,
the 30-day comment period expired on May 28,2003,
II, Comments on the EA W were received from four agencies:
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Metropolitan Council
Minnesota Historical Society
,
III,
Comments are included as Exhibit "B". Responses to comments are listed below.
.
The following comments were received and responses provided, Refer to the # on
the Agency comment letter for corresponding responses.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
#1, MnlDOT controls access to TH95. An access permit is required from that
agency, Their concern can be addressed through permit review.
#2 A drainage permit is required from MnlDOT. Any MnlDOT drainage
requirements will be addressed through that permit.
#3 Noise standards are being addressed through specific building design.
Noise levels along North Main Street do not typically exceed standards.
No noise mitigation requested from state.
#4 The impact on the wayside is addressed under question 25(a) of the EA W,
Relocation of the site is being coordinated with State Historic Preservation
Office,
.
...
.;
.
#3
.
MINNESOT A POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
#1
A sewer extension permit is being requested from MPCA and
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Adequate capacity exists
in the plant and transmission line to accommodate estimated flows based
on the City Comprehensive PIano
MET COUNCIL
Met Council response states, "that the EA W is complete and accurate and raises
no major issues of consistency with council policieso An EIS is not necessary for
regional purposeso"
#1 The site is not located in the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway,
#2 Note MPCA comment above, Permits from DNR and MPCA will be
applied for.
Significant effort was put into an analysis of the unusual ground water
situation on the site, Currently the site has significant surface water that
results from springs discharging onto and through the site, This water will be
managed through a extensive drain tile system. Dewatering of the site for
underground parking structures will result in a discharge through the drain tile
system, All ofthe groundwater collected through this system will be used in a
geothermal system and ultimately discharged into the river. Analysis of the
site shows that existing ground water on the site ultimately discharges to the
river either via the springs that discharge onto the site or underground flow to
the river. - K,E. City Engineer
#4 It is anticipated that a dewatering plan will be necessary to construct and
reconstruct portions of this project. The report from Allied Testing describes
some of the issues that will be encounter and should be referred to for further
explanation, - K.E, City Engineer
#5 The site is not in the St. Croix flood
#6 The City of Stillwater required significant and substantial amounts of
engineering and scientific analysis to demonstrate that the storm water
management plan will function as anticipated and for further explanation of
the various systems that will be used for this site and how they will function
the site storm water management dated March 10, 2003 prepared by BKBM
Engineers Inc. should be referred to. - K.E, City Engineer
#7
.
The cited map makes many a priori assumptions on a regional basis. The very
high pollution sensitivity indicates that site-specific conditions must be
examinedo The bedrock directly under most of the site is part of the St.
Lawrence Formation, At the site is has low primary permeability, Water
flows through a secondary permeability network of fractures, cracks, bedding
..
"
planes, and jointso The red color of the rock and high iron content of water
from this formation indicates that the pattern of flow in the bedrock has been
goings on for a very long time, Rocks with flow mostly through secondary
permeability systems are not generally sensitive to contamination, However,
the area of the buried bedrock valley on the site can be considered a sensitive
area,
.
#8 The Terra Springs project interpretive trail will connect to a future regional
trail and future sidewalks and pedestrian trails connecting the project to
downtown.
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
#1 The developer has proposed an alternative method of mitigating archeological
resources as written in letter to Howard Lieberman, Chairman HPC, items 1-6.
(Attached Exhibit "C")
#2 The City and developer will coordinate the relocation ofthe wayside with Tim
Glines, MHS,
#3 An interpretive trail and center is a part of the Terra Springs project. A
committee with City of Stillwater HPC members has been established to aid in
the development and design of the trail historic content of the interpretation.
#4
Monitoring of construction impacts on Wardens house will be an element of
construction arrangement. Adequate on site parking is being provided to
accommodate the new use, Depending on the interest of the Washington
County Historical Society a national register may be appropriate.
.
#5 No comment necessary.
IV, Finding of Fact.
A, The proposed Terra Springs mixed use PUD is served by City services,
B. Adequate access to the site is provided by TH 95.
C. Storm water quality of runoff from the site will increase as a result of site
development.
D, Historic resources mitigation have been conditional as a part of project
approval as stated.
1. The wall around the prison site shall be repaired and reconstructed.
2, The wayside shall be relocated as a destination point on the
interpretive trail.
.
..
.
3. '
An interpretive trail and center for the site shall be constructed as a
part of project development.
4, The developer shall contract with a registered state archeologist to
monitor and document significant historic resource during
construction,
5, The EA Wand responses to comments have adequately addressed
issues contained in the worksheet.
60 The proposed development does not create a cumulative impact.
7, There have been no comments received suggesting that further
environmental review is warranted,
8, The City finds that the project as proposed does not have a
potential for significant environmental impact.
IV, The City of Stillwater finds that the proposed Terra Springs PUD does not have
the potential for significant environmental impact and issue a negative declaration
with mitigation on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet.
.
.
..
.
.
.
~ t .,
,.
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director V
May 28, 2003
Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment Changing the Zoning for Two Lots
from Single Family Residential, RA, to Duplex Residential, RB. Case
No, ZAM/03-02.
This item was heard by the Planning Commission at their meeting of May 12, 2003,
The Planning Commission voted 4-4 regarding the request. Some commissioner's felt
that the spot zoning precedence was a bad decision to start and other commissioner's
felt the practical effect of the request was negligible,
Recommendation: Decision on request.
.
Attachments: Application, staff report and minutes of 5/12/03CPC meeting,
If approved:
Findings:
1. The public necessity and the general community welfare warrant the adoption of the
amendment; and
2. The amendment is in the general conformation with the principles and policies set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
.
e- ~ t,
'\
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
~. ~.
.
20. All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed byHeritage
Preservation Commission.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. ZAM/03-02. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot
from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District
located at 1508 West Olive Street. Jeff and Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi
Larson, applicants.
Mr. Melstrom and Mr. Larson requested rezoning two lots from, RA, Single
Family to RB, Duplex Residential. The required square footage for RA is 10,000.
The required square footage for RB is 7,500. The rezoning would allow the
applicants to split their lots to create a total of three lots. The applicants stated
that a duplex would not be built on the third lot only a Single Family home.
The existing use and zoning for the entire area surrounding the proposed
rezoning site is Single Family Residential. This request represents spot zoning
that is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or good zoning practice.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to deny the
Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from RA, Single Family
Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West Olive
Street. Motion fails. 4 fore, 4 against.
Case No. SUB/03-36. A subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of
7,500 square feet located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single
Family Residential District. Jeff and Gina Melstrom, applicants.
.
Since the motion for Case No. ZAM/03-02 failed. This item was not discussed.
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to deny
subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet located at
1502 and 1508 West Olive Street Motion passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. V/03-38. A variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet
required, g' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at
1010 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Billy J. Elliot,
applicant.
Mr. Elliot requested a variance to the front yard setbacks for the construction of a roof
deck. The lot and the house are non-conforming. The lot is 3,208 square feet, 7,500 .
3
.:/I' >>
.'
· Memo
('
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
May 8, 2003
Rezoning Request from Single Family Residential, RA to Duplex
Residential, RB, Located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street.
MelstromjLarson, applicants. Case No. ZAMj03-02.
The request is to rezone two lots from RA, Single Family to RB, Duplex Residential.
The existing use and zoning for the entire area surrounding the proposed rezoning site
is Single Family Residential.
This request represents spot zoning, That is not consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan or good zoning practice,
.
The applicants were informed of planning concerns for the request but wanted to
proceed with rezoning request.
Recommendation: Denial
Findings: The request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and good zoning
practices, 0
Attachments: Application
CPC Action on 5/12/03: 4-4 No Decision
.
-/, ~ ~ 5 Ii.. .." I I _ I.... , I J
= ",," ....
':% - ./ ..... ....
/ ....' ; :SUNNY~LUt'I:' LANI:
..... :
, ,..
~ ~ 12 ~- "
4... ..-
. '.
- . ~
" ! ...- tl
I tto I iG
7 = 3 .. = I ~ 7 { ~- fK 1111 w ~
.....'
,.. t;
I
..... ,
"' "' , ...,
-"'" 3 ......
! ....
9 'ff"f.
..
'"
MYRTLE \
'''~'"-'" '"I-
e 8""'''' 7 8' 4-- 3-- 2-- 1 tu
! I ! ! i........! ! ! ! ~
...' - ~ - ti
.. \
.."t-oo "r/", .=t-4
~~ ..., ~:. ~~ ~., S~LJ\Il_'S
_ 17 ' 19 : ' 21 22 23 21 W
~~ ! z z S s a ~>
g ..~ !! .., !! J.. !l!l ~ ~
... 11 ........, ..-"" C)
.
VVt:.::.
WEST
4
~o '. I~~ ..
I ~ "'/tSJ~ 10--
Yi12 I!!
''!nu ~
l5 'j 13 .-,
n= # IIO.,t
ID "
10
.
! !
-
-,
~ i
.. 15
f/) 1 18
10
0
..
50
..
-
ft
e
...!!!!!L
~
AI
14 ~150.21 JI
7...
i i
-
t\AlVrSt:1 11
10
~
.....
.::. ; Ki=t: 7
....
l\l
~
I
-
-
i!:
;:)
o
f/)
-
.'Ztl
fI
-
15
...'
....' ;... :.. .. tg.,
= !
-
7~
.. 'L t'--. . , 7'(-':
I sp~llx '~
/''''' /7
!B . f.r
!!: -.."q
..e;o- . ....
..
M~
-
..
...
I
i
..
...'
II
l
CSAH 5
10 !.1 t I 3 I~t 1 ! . 8...1.., 5 . ...'.., 3
- I . l -
.. .. "..~C r T ty Al\~.
1~" ." II " -4-...~. 4, ..
. ... --l ....,.
~.,~ 9.....,10 / I ~~.... f"O II'"
. ... -1 L .. I I!B 8, Ii
-i I.... 0:: - \
I 'ti. 9.... ""'"-,
~ aDAK a STR~ETa _ ..-" .... 2t .:...J.
..
8
! L
~
.....!!-
12
-,
I
f
"
I
Iii
w
~
l-
I W
W
~
If/)
.
f ~..
I ...
, :: VACATEDWE$T'T~9 Tor - . .'
~! ~.. _ ~'! ~ : f ~, I: ;" rJ
tOO ..... '111 I...
. : -te-13 ;.. :-. , . - .~ ~ ·
~ !!~-_t~-'~~-' · t! ;J.~ :. " ~i-:' ~k
f/) ,NU' ~: I · ::::l; ~ 1 0 - J
. ~ II ...., ~.I.. I.. " ~. ... I ~ - I ~ I
-.... ... .. -2 ~ ..... i...!n~ lIOOICV_...t.... .... k
WEST PINE STREET ~ '
...{~^ I,..~-t",,~t
!.. f~.&Q.I 1.. _
I
-J
Location Map
12
AREA NOT GIOCOClID
~
.
I
,
2
-
, .
1
...'"
11
~
<
"
.
IUIW R:OW RI9W
..,
~:
: L ~::'
1"..8N '=1l"..8N
nmLJ nm
T32N
TJtN
JU."W R2IW JUOW
Vicinity Map
"
...
J
w_~}-.
f
.
.
o
204
Scale in Feet
ipLt>l
,................fIl.-.._
... .. ". fII...,___t-.,
......IR___W......~.....
n............ _.....Iar~
~_. " c..nr.,..
.......forlnJ'
--':WIiIJliftgIDne-c,.....,....OIlca
........(1I1IoQO..4111S
p-.............A&ilOO...........
-..-.~.....,.. am
.....pmtM AfII'l,aocD
.
, P~NNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
.
ACTION REQUESTED
/.-
Case No: Zlf~~
Date Filed: 1fII6/~..3
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.: -b6~
FEES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER '
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STillWATER, MN 55082
Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
Variance ,$70/200
Resubdivision $100
,X Subdivision* $100+501l0t
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
x.. Zoning Amendment* $300
~Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (I e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
' supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
. Address of Project /50 fJ W () /;'~ .$' t . Assessor's Parcel Ngd9a0 do "fl/tJOS?
tJ IL '1" I (3EOICode) .1
40ning District ."IT ' Description of Project .r... fZl H'U {1 yt~, ,~lj:;J 0 I' ,/.1 fl Q
-;LLb ,P xlJ:::iJJQ' JJJtJ -uT:1)---th\..1-t ~(}t).- .
"I hereby state the forego)ng statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in i
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply Vi
:::::~:rreff:~~~~~.lli&~
Mailing Address I ~ () f IJ - () I ~ V f. L,-r- Mailing
City -State - ZiP:. . " ' * ~ MY\S"~Dg-~City- tat
, , Ii /},-'~ // __
Signature' ,II. \~U;~~natu
(Sign lure is required( v
.
LotSize (dimensions).ffix ;2 50
Land Area II t,N)
- ~
Height of B.Uildings: S1V1d:
Principal
Accessory
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,/IA--
Total Building floor area WI' J . square feet
Existing _ square feet
Feet Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12. 2002
r';Llwater
~ - - ~~
~ -,
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p,m, in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from Jeff and Gina Melstrom and
Tim and Jodi Larson for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from
RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at
1508 West Olive Street. Case No, ZAMj03-02.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting,
Publish: May 23,2003
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
.
. .....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.. ' , ..
To The Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers;
We live at 1511 W. olive. In response to the request to
Rezone the properties of 1502 and 1508 W. Olive, we strongly
Object. We feel it would not fit into the single family
Neighborhood,
Thank You for Your Attention.
Sincerely,
~
'-fJLz.,/ c Ib, i3crc/~
~0~;/ teJ. d( ~ d
~~)~
c/'" J
LSf-~J
7??
.
-ro~cd~~"
u1.cv.L~~~
~~(;~~
~ ~ ~- cltu-t.~ Me ~
-, , ~,
. W,L J)iv-e ~ ~ ~ ~
~~/s~~~
~., WL ~lJf ~ ~
d.o-ru... tnt ~ jvLC-;uAZz. ~ ~
· .:4 ~~~
.
~
rr ~ . .. V). ffCL~kL
35/-/910
,
.'
· Memo
.
.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council , /
Steve Russell, Community Development Director 1'-'
May 28,2003
Request to Resubdivide Two Lots into Three Lots located in the RA,
Single Family Residential District, 1502-1508 West Olive Street.
SUBj03- 36.
This request was heard by the Planning Commission at their meeting of May 12, 2003,
The Planning Commission denied the request on a 5-3 vote based on the proposal not
being consistent with existing zoning,
Recommendation: Decision on request.
Attachments: Application, staff report and minutes.
"
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
,f. ~.
.
20. All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Heritage
Preservation Commission.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. ZAM/03-02. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot
from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District
located at 1508 West Olive Street. Jeff and Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi
Larson, applicants.
Mr. Melstrom and Mr. Larson requested rezoning two lots from, RA, Single
Family to RB, Duplex Residential. The required square footage for RA is 10,000.
The required square footage for RB is 7,500. The rezoning would allow the
applicants to split their lots to create a total of three lots. The applicants stated
that a duplex would not be built on the third lot only a Single Family home.
The existing use and zoning for the entire area surrounding the proposed
rezoning site is Single Family Residential. This request represents spot zoning
that is not consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan or good zoning practice.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to deny the
Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from RA, Single Family
Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West Olive
Street. Motion fails. 4 fore, 4 against.
Case No. SUB/03-36. A subdivision of a 50' x 230" parcel to create a new parcel of
7,500 square feet located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single
Family Residential District. Jeff and Gina Melstrom, applicants.
.
Since the motion for Case No. ZAM/03-02 failed. This item was not discussed.
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to deny
subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet located at
1502 and 1508 West Olive Street. Motion passed, 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. V/03-38. A variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet
required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at
1010 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Billy J. Elliot,
applicant.
Mr. Elliot requested a variance to the front yard setbacks for the construction of a roof
deck. The lot and the house are non-conforming. The lot is 3,208 square feet, 7,500 .
3
1
.
.
.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE ~O. SUB/03-36
Planning Commission Date: May 12, 2003
Project Location: 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family
Zoning District: RA
Applicants Name: Jeff and Gina Melstrom and Tom and Jodi Larson
Type of Application: Subdivision
Project Description: Request to resubdivide two existing lots into three lots.
Discussion: The request is first based on Planning Commission approval of the
previous rezoning Case ZAMj03-02 changing the zoning of the two lots from RA,
Single Family to RB, Duplex (staff recommended denial), Because the rezoning is
recommended for denial and because the RA lot standards can not be met by the
proposed subdivision, denial is recommended for this subdivision request.
Again, the applicants were informed of planning department concerns for the zoning
and subdivision request but wanted the opportunity to present their request to the
Planning Commission,
Recommendation: Denial
Findings: The request is not consistent with the Zoning Ordinance (density, lot size).
Attachments: Application
CPC Action on 5/12/03: 5-3 Denial
, PLANNING ADMINI:;RATION APPLICATION F'5RM
ACTION REQUESTED
Case No: Sotlo'6 q
Date Filed: ~6'1~
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.: ~
FEES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
Variance $70/200
Resubdivision $100
,X Subdivision* $100+50/lot
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
~Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e" photos, sketches, etc,)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
' supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay t.
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project /5ZJ BW (J 1/ 'tt-e_ ~t Assessor's Parcel N9~~9tlM07o'Slqu:"
J? /L' /) " d. lfiEO/Cpd,e) j /J
Zoning District fYT Description of Project ~ f.Jflfll 0 J1. , ~ J~ X. x.
-::Wo j iut.-iJ1G" jrJ{;) -,( rdn--thU_2, J6/)..
"I hereby state the forego)ng statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in a
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply wi
the permit if it is granted and used"
;>roperty ownerJiffyfY, ()C{ ~rvJ . RepresentaW<e - CElV l:::.\J
Ma;~ing Address 1_C;D[j,J . Q1, Vf. '>-r- Mailing Al'dresf\t:.- ·
City.. Btate - Zip , , *- f2- Mn s-Q)f ~City _ Statl _ ZIO APR 1 5 2003
Telephon" J. ::;1. '3 Sf -7 37) Telephone No. - ..-. i'i',CI f"lPMENT 1
~ - . tl f _1---~' Z~~ COMMU~EPARTMEW" -
Signature. . 'W1J\{}tIt/\.. 7'/'/~~lgnature' -
(Signpture Is require (Signature is required)
Lot Size (dimeOSions)mx;) YO
Land Area II t,t1n - .
Heiilhl of BUildings: SlV'/it:
' Principal
Accessory
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,} ,A--
Total Building floor area Nt' J square feet
Existing ,square feet .
Feet Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12, 2002
I. Iii I I I ,. I
,.
,
.
Melstrom/larson
Rezoning and subdividing proposal
.
.
..
"
TO: PLANNING COMMISION' .
FROM: 1508 W. OLIVE - MELSTROM / 1502 W. OLIVE - LARSON
SUBJECT: REZONING AND SUBDIVISION
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
THE REASON WHY I AM WRITING THIS, IS IN REGARDS TO
OUR BACK LOTS OFF OF WEST RAMSEY STREET. WE RESIDE AT
1508 AND 1502 W. OLIVE STREET AND BOTH OF OUR LOTS ARE
50' X 230'. WHAT WE ARE PROPOSING FOR YOU, IS TO MAKE THE
TWO FRONT LOTS 50' X 155', AND COMBINE THE BACK OF OUR
LOTS INTO A 75' X 100' LOT. WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO REZONE OUR LOTS FROM 10,000
SQUARE FEET TO 7,500 SQUARE FEET. SO THEN WE CAN MAKE
THE LOT INTO A BUILDABLE LOT.
WE HAVE TALKED TO AND RECIEVED APPROVAL FROM
THE NEIGHBORS ( SEE ATTACHED). WE HAVE ACCEPTED AN ,
OFFER FROM ONE OF THE NF;.~pHBORS, HE LIVES AT 1322 W.
RAMSEY ST. HE IS A BUlLDE~HAS TOTALLY REFURBISHED HIS
HOME INTO A BEAUTIFUL VICTORIAN COTTAGE THAT HAS
ONLY BROUGHT MORE VALUE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. (SEE
PICTURES) . THE PLAN IS TO BUILD A TUCKUNDER HOME ON
THIS LOT.
THE TRAFFIC ON RAMSEY STREET IS VERY LOW. SO
PLEASE CONSIDER THIS, AND FEEL FREE TO COME BY AND
LOOK AT THE LOTS.
.
THANK YOU,
JEFF AND GINA MELSTROM
TOM AND JODI LARSON
.
~
.
.1
.
.1 t 1
! 4.'''cf
/.
.r....(
,f
, .I
.i'~~4
,,~~.~.,.
""",J<",.,~"""",,,~,~ '
1
.
,
,
j, ,
~ i
..--~~~x~...".o...~i~-""'''''''-.'---''.'
I
1
"'''''__''__'''_t~l,..~,.,."""."".r.,,,.,.,,,,,,,..~,.,,..,
';J
f r'~.l
t .... -i'J
g
~
)~::J"~,f;..A
}
.f
~"_,,w.;:'
:;,'-".
l 't_,;,-,
I
l
;~'~
".~
f
~~~:.~~:;...'" .
11
/'1501(oo~
12
150,11
(OO94)
13 7j5O; 3
a:>
-
14 , L'"
'. 1~_: , "~"
151 ;51
150,26
16
o
<0
"~'
0;
C"\J)
5124
(OeM;
,.,.
6N5
L()~
,_.,,~
1'~}4 _
...,
LOC21iO:', h,'rar:-
<.>
\(')
o ::i\
'" ....
~-f"
10 '," s
Q
(()l)9~
~
.----.
l"
8" .,.. 7
~.
ten
50
"
50
...._, -
26
o
....,
-
2
~..........,...
eC"f.) 5
eN'
C") (ooro)
4
0:
'"
...
g
'"
o
"'~"
50
50
'\.'
50
/50
r
i S~
26
50
17~ 19~~" 2Ufs~ ~
:! ~. '-~ ' ~f-~~ . -. · _n . ..~.
(0096)
15038
WEST
0>
'\iO~:;'.'!
"~'
',"
15()
"~'
Cr'l
'~(OO5s)
LO
'\"'"'',
a?
"
<D
.,.
50
~i '.'0 :
50 50
RAMSEY
O'3}
1"'tf"'t7} "- F"
'~',' '-Awl '- itM)
LQ ;~ ..O,...:~
" , I/) ~l()
, ' '-, ; 1
i I. " J.' ,'" " g '. co
· !' \ "1"":;::
l,^,.,d ~ (if"
.; -J.;
I ". J
"j :> l
1 i
. ,
,J
t
~
. ... ~ ,.
'---~
'i\' ",.
4 3
""'ii,'"''''''
Ir'\ :=
"-eli. .I _
plLN-S
~,1
2 C'? 1
..0
L0
'\''''''
4'L ~;,L
;~';:;77
~.
t -; :,-; J.
9
, ,31-4-
o
g to-
~ co
w
5,
:, L...l
~
Err
50
660
(1)
~I
,
,8
'~.:}
N
(OO~'
~
85
60
23
~-
50
50 50
STREET
'_.,1
0>
\:'7
ory~l
II\." "
0:>
<::>
r-
N
Ul
Ul
~'
;::'
11,:' 111111 ~:~
It>
'I~.
'~"
CSAH 5
~
,6);1
!'~\'
,
I'--
'5 .. I!
"",""'''''' "f
I'.........
I
!
.~\..
SE"E~
50
be
,3;5"
v
q
:'-.I
-<r
'"
.
~!;\t. ~)%' R~~
:'";.1"';
! TJ.::"i
f1
d..
t'M;".;
\
";'--'q~;:
" l~',=j
~
:::~; r '!.~"(s
r;-!'-.:
,; ~,
....' ;-
',,\:,.-1
,~'.'" r:l-.t ":!,i'\'I:
\/idnity ~,,~ap
.
I
:J/t:;;,~,,~. 4
._-;~~-
"T
o
87
Scale :n Feet
.
'" i, ',:,:C::---', -,-.."'-. ':,,-- ';, -,."-,-_<
--,,"--' . -,,- ", --" -'" '''". -.-
Trmnk ~'Utl''-_jbr yiPdf C0!5p6ffiti6.iL
, f'.~...~1t9,1~~;t'",~7>~.~;r,,~i~;;':!~<'i-dID/;'!r. "';;"/'1,1,' ,!(/'
.,.,.. 't,;,"J"1 - -'" t ,.. ...., ..-"t< A_.-....-J""....-_.. "_: ~ U, 5"
'fj, (J j,,;'\ '.'..,.I\'t-~ '. .l? ~,.:.... .'.."
.~..f'i'l.,,"\. ",' ,,-,t '\.H.)...;;I~ ! :!i;'.;A ,I,,:"v7tl.c.;: /C../~
. ~'-l..A ~ I f' :I)~ -+:~ .rV"'\.~kJ.[\_....~'_'" _ ~-"...J/ j
J
f.' /, ~:2_
/ C' 111 i117~fi~...7
Lv'.....! 7.... "f' ..
... .' ,( .., " Ii
..)5.' /J/ "'I e J' "-
""-"--.--.....~-
r.~;.,,~,
{/
~...'
.,., ~:~'~Erl,.?fi:.l
, --- ,7
j'-;-:-:~\~5;;.::;_j /-S
--..".......
- ~ )"i' \i
,~, I,
,--,
r I~./ { ~J
, J
, I
-".\,
v-....
I~,~'~} t"^J ,-
. ...) -"- lr Kar:r")A...(,V
)
t'/In l i
I',);/~," <4..,;;
"1'J!i{(10vIU
\~ A'll'\A"~,'~ 1311 /iJnl'?:iiJ
. I, ". j'" .1 . . 7"($" "J c~....-l
, ,.... t.."",, ,It -"'~_~'~j" " '. '.'
,."k--:::.::7".... <.F''''\;''-'-'-'~-I ~..'i" .;<tiV!,,-...Q1.ir\
tot ' - ' -" " _ _}
P<.J.'r'CR'-. .~~ ..'~ i ~ 'J;. 4\ ",of, ",..f)-f, v' ,~,
1t::Jifft,t:;:f~f:fJ~;:/:~rf~
I '. ' .. ft..!' <' / f;' ,;.P
_~___ i L, -LiL/l- -tLL___
t-? fi... C'
6..f,; tL
..,rJ",
1
#i-'~". n -r i~j.
1"'~? J/r::-
!J;- - /'
, ",,~-'i; .,=+:.(t.;r:~~t.,,;---
i.
..-:7 f" :/ .~'_r;
:>< ,:-:.._, .-'-'-'7'{--7 ;-l.) i<(-~(!l..":.L<;.>
J~:f.i:::~-_;;ir:.~- :,j-f,. _~~~'_ :.~. __ -i'-'~- i./"'"
-Ir#f).~~~J~
_ct.} ~_!';, ~ " ~.\.._tl~---.\\'r,' _ '
;j ,.....)...._: :::,t.r,..., _ ~ '" .;-;:_
jl "./1; . 11 ")
- - .Jj.; ~
'1':> <
'!'-15~ :-=:;k
~ r~ -" ,
.;" ::>+
t-L\~~,l.:-3
:"'~L ., .J-.
:J
\,,!,
c"
'i;"'...-.f---tA'i
J
.
....
.::)
.
f
.
.
.
C')
II.> ("\ D p, t,
~ ,-., ...,
J "?
h ,~t-t f(",
'"
t
.
.
.
t Iwater
~ - - ~~
THE BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA J
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SUBDIVISION
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p,m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from Jeff and Gina Melstrom for
the subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet
located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single Family Residential
District, Case No, SUBj03-36,
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting,
Publish: May 23, 2003
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
~'
.'
. To Whom It May Concern;
Elr We, the ~dersigned, have no problem with our ~Hullediate neighbor Mr Billy J
IOrt, constructmg a deck on the roof of his house. ,.,
.
NAME
...,.
.)~\j\0\ + ~'t<OLL~
'L_1DC-'f ~Ue~Sk(\(,,-r
JUl11/~
I' V IVl /J..rM S "'," {I;1 7
\)j ; { "( ?yz.'" ~t r ~ I\.-
l#JIft#t~ ~
(Y1 ~A--e:J.. ~iS(
/!~ 1f/ ~
.
ADDRESS
I O\) Y l!-IJ:- S 1\.1 Sh' II uJ:J
IDM ;IJ, l/-f!: 8-1- @,'!I~'
II u') y7ijT. )TSl~
/ eM W J.J//!C/AJ:
d., ,1, \) \J; } I ( IV j ,
()/~ cd W//!<I;';s'
.:S'CD w tA.';/t L K: V
. , =-ll-t ...::::: ,or-
\ 6\'5 1'-1, ~ - ::::>\.
tJ
\J
<
\t
j 'j
.
J
, .,. FCI\c.e.
(()
(2)
1 f t:.M:.. c.-
5' I .
,CelVQ.IK
--
L./ -J-~ S-t
",\,:>\~
,..{ ( t. e.
\
SJ,ed
~
-
\J d
~ J
\) "
\.l \J
,lit
0.;..~~~
...3
I,( R..""
"~_._""~' 1
~.
Vl
C'\
<.
-::J.
3
\
L
.
.
.
_"",.'_ .,,,,,*,,..-.~__~~___,.......~w~..-........~_ ,__"__~_ -'~~...,-..........' _ ______...._'____..."" ~....-'.....______.._:'__~ --....'" "'lli" .._"'"' ,.."'---..'........".--.-
';clt
:;1,
~
Iii
:t:.
..
~
:{
:..
~
~
'''',iJ,iiJ!~~:,
r',,, "
~
.~; *~l~
A ~lj
i!~
.~;
if
;~ ~
.1
jJ1
~
"
Ii
>
"", ~ ~~
II
,~
"
I:!n
~'<'
::I. 'tM
'I
~
,. "
~~I~.
~
~, ~
,~
'<l' ~.p
Ii
~
~
~,'
.
. '~'\
.
..
~~
~I t
~f:
,,t
l"
11
1tt~
rn !l/i
;l:
;;!ft,
; 11 It rcii~
p,i'. (!f':-',-~~,,-/fi
:~ '
t~.: ;~;:
:>Ii n.;~'-
;;;"
."
';\'(il:;:',:
"'.- ~'f~3;qf
~f'
;r ',f
'r; " t~'
Y ~,;
~~tr~~-t
!1t "
"
;AK~
~
.r.
;;ki
H
!j
j.\ ~
;~
)~.-
,;;gc,'
i~~;:
,,>
~; ~
~tt,~ ;"1
~~~
'" ~
Kii ~
(;I'
~?~
~J}
~:.ll
r~~q:: ~~~
Ii) ~ ,\
r~.
~~
f'-<,
",;.~ 'f;:.~;~
, ll','.L.: ~~ ~l.l
.... :3
~;!O
tt
fJ'"
.~
t;C;:i
i{
1\
~
~ III
.,. ~
,~i1\~
1'1 J 1\,
Jr", ~
~,~
~i
.~ "if ~
~
')
~~
~.~
<f'l! (JP.'l1l ~,;- i~t~ ~11:""
~1 'Ji:p.l~,t~
,~
y
.
.
(,
.
~",,,,,,,,---,,,,-,~,,,,,,,--~,,,"-" ~~~~-'~"".....:"!
,
\,
~r
"e
if?
olJ
e,
r '
l,t
t
t.
'"
I
~ ,l """.
..............~'i1
9
.
~
ill! r
~, '~d"~"
'1<'l'/
:'11 ";;,
1f'1 :t~}I!li
tf
~
~
~:
-w.,.......~~ 'l~
...... ~~ .... ~~ :'O'l'l'............ ""'"'" .... ~
~
"4
~,l;
"f,
H~
'.;1.'!i
~f ~
i;-:;"
~
~,~~
, I~
~
I!
s<"i$i
i'
lllll'ill
1i~
!!;J
"
!iI~"",
ti
~ ~Jhail;..~~ j
~ ~
-;~
'lr
,..
,. - :j! ~ '"'
n~~'ti ~" ~
i~ ." ..!!l
:J ~<"'~, .", ~
iW" ,,,,;;'1 ~
~
~"iJ,
'd ~
.
~
iJ.5..
~!
~
'II"
, ~
jd
. '!lII
~
;,
@.
'1'~
"
.
:l~
~
of<4.l"'''!il~
~- ~~4I'~
,- ~.,
" iW
.. n:l'
~ ~'
vli:",,~.J
~,,~.. '~
.. 1100 ~..,.
~. ri.I~~'
10.
~
~;
Illl,
1 ~
;!il
'. fi.;
"
\
,
,~'lb
'III
;! ~<
~;j
,~ ,'I'
~
", ,~
tJ
~4J~ilJd~
':.,ii1i
~i .~~~
~
,--
.
.
.
/
I'
~4 .......-....,~
~......
"".'
'"
.J
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council iI /'
Steve Russell, Community Development Director /'-'"
May 28, 2003
Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Request for a Variance to
Setbacks to Construct a Roof Deck, Case No. V/03-38.
The request is to construct a roof deck on a legal nonconforming lot of 3,208 square
feet. The lot is less than half the required size, 7,500 square feet. The lot is located on ,
a corner requiring 30 foot street setbacks, 25 foot rear yard setback and a 5 foot side
yard setback, '
The existing structure does not meet any of the setbacks and an accessory structure is
located over the lot line,
.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their meeting of May 12, 2003.
Concerns expressed were for neighborhood privacy and small lot size for amount of
building,
Recommenation: Denial
Attachments: Letter of appeal, application, staff report and minutes of 5/12/03 CPC
meeting,
.
\,
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
.
20. All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Heritage
, Preservation 'Commission,
Motion passed unanimously,
Case No. ZAM/03-02. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot
from RA, Single Family Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District
located at 1508 West Olive Street. Jeff and Gina Melstrom and Tim and Jodi
Larson, applicants.
Mr. Melstrom and Mr, Larson requested rezoning two lots from, RA, Single
Family to RB, Duplex Residential. The required square footage for RA is 10,000.
The required square footage for RB is 7,500. The rezoning would allow the
applicants to split their lots to create a total of three lots. The applicants stated
that a duplex would not be built on the third lot only a Single Family home,
The existing use and zoning for the entire area surrounding the proposed
rezoning site is Single Family Residential. This request represents spot zoning
that is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or good zoning practice.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Teske to deny the
Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a 50' x 230' foot lot from RA, Single Family
Residential District to RB, Two Family Residential District located at 1508 West Olive
Street. Motion fails. 4 fore, 4 against.
Case No. SUB/03-36. A subdivision of a 50' x 230" parcel to create a new parcel of
7,500 square feet located at 1502 and 1508 West Olive Street in the RA, Single
Family Residential District. Jeff and Gina Melstrom, applicants.
.
Since the motion for Case No, ZAM/03-02 failed. This item was not discussed.
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to deny
subdivision of a 50' x 230' parcel to create a new parcel of 7,500 square feet located at
1502 and 1508 West Olive Street. Motion passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. V/03-38. A variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet
required, 9' 7" and 19" 4" requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at
1010 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Billy J. Elliot,
applicant.
Mr. Elliot requested a variance to the front yard setbacks for the construction of a roof .
deck. The lot and the house are non-conforming. The lot is 3,208 square feet, 7,500
3
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
4., #.
square feet is the minimum allowed for the Two Family zoning district. The house has
been built within the required setbacks and is very close to the corner. Adding a roof
deck would increase the house mass, therefore creating a greater imposition on the'
street. The house, shed, and concrete surfaces are greater than the approved
maximum 30 % impervious surface coverage of a lot adding more to the non-conformity
of the lot.
The highest point on the home would be 24 feet tall. There would be no lights on
the deck.
Commissioner Teske was not comfortable with the variance because is would
increase the mass of the house.
Motion made by Commissioner Teske, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to deny
the variance to the front yard setbacks (corner lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4"
requested) for the construction of a roof deck located at 1010 4th Street North. Motion
passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. V/03-39. A variance to the front yard setbacks (30 feet required, 29" 6"
requested) for the construction of an entry overhang located at 317 North
Sherburne Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Jay and Teresa
Libby, applicants.
Mr. and Mrs. Libby requested a variance to the front yard setback for the
construction of an entry overhang. There is an issue with the existing steps. They
need to be widened, as they exist they are too narrow to enter the house easily
when the front door is opened, you have to step back down the steps to get
around the open door. The steps are also icy in the winter with melting roof snow
re-freezing on the steps. Mr. and Mrs. Libby feel that it would be much safer if a
roof overhang covered them.
A majority of the houses on the street are closer to Sherburne Streetthan the
applicant's house would be. If ~he applicants construct the overhang entry, they
would be seven feet closer to Sherburne Street, making the new setback 29'6".
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Teske to
approve the variance to the front yard setbacks (30 feet required, 29' 6" requested) for
the construction of an entry overhang located at 317 North Sherburne Street with the
following conditions:
1.
All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director,
4
,.
Billy J. Elliott L.
Ie> /0 N. t.{.JA--.5v-
.Si ~ 1 \ t./41ar J }f\fl
rroS-1-
41.Cf- '-'6'..3)
Stillwater City Council
To Whom It May Concern,
I am appealing the decision of the Stillwater Planning Commission in regards to' a
roof deck to be erected on the roof of my house. The decision was denial on the basis it
would create too much mass on my property. On the contrary, I believe the deck itself
would be a welcome addition to the property, and the stairway access would hardly be
noticeable from the street. I have ~llll1ediate neighbors who concur. The deck would
resemble a "Widow's Walk" type of affair and would be under the 30' limit of a two-
story house. From most views, it would be concealed behind trees and only visible from a
short distance. Also, I believe people's attention would be more directed at the
Armstrong House kitty-comer from mine and the monolith of a garage on the property
~~lluediately to the East. For these reasons I am asking you to please grant me a variance
to build a roof deck. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~/41L cI;J:j
Bill>> Elliott
.
)~@[gDWccor.
MAY I 5 i:.,) '1 ; j
I' II
lJ)'"J
I,'
V
..
.
.J.t. . 'water
~ ) --
:::;:;;--- ---=:;; ~\ ~
---
THE BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
VARIANCE
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p,m, in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commissions
decision on a request from Billy J. Elliot for a variance to the front yard setbacks
(corner lot) (30 feet required, 9' 7" and 19' 4" requested) for the construction of a roof
deck located at 1010 4th Street North in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Case
No, V/03-38,
. All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting,
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Publish: May 23, 2003
.
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
~
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. V/03-38
Planning Commission Date: May 12, 2003
.
Project Location: 1010 North Fourth Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: Billy J. Elliot
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: A variance to the front yard setbacks (comer lot) (30' required, 9' 7"and 19' 4"
requested) for the construction of a roof deck.
Conditions of Approval:
Should the Commission approve the project, staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
1. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Director.
Findings:
1. That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act ofthe owner, exists. ill this context,
personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not
hardships justifying a variance.
2. That a variance is necessary forthe preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity; and that a variance, if
granted, would not constitute a special privilege ofthe recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
3. That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not
materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the
Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments: Application form, site plan, photos
CPC Action on 5/12/03: 5-3 Denial
.
.t fJ' ~ \ f'\L- !blJ..}JJ\' s~
2'~ ...
I
.
5/3/03
I
f)~ -, -r~Oj
This document is to define a said forth arrangement between Mr. and Mrs.
David Rowe and their neighbor Billy Elliot.
.
In April of 2003 Mr. Elliot approached us with an offer to buy 9ft by 65ft of
our land so he could further his development of his property and home. We
decided to take this offer under consideration and investigate the avenues it
would take to sell Mr. Elliot this land.
The first thing that needed to be done was to.detclH1ine the property line, in
doing so it was found out that Mr. Elliot had already encroached our
property by 4ft by 65ft and that his retaining wall, fence, a part of his shed,
and a portion ifhis drive way is on our property.
After consideration my wife and I decided not to sell Mr. Elliot the property
he had requested.
In regards to the encroached property we have agreed to allow Mr. Elliot to
keep the portion of drive way, fence, and the retaining wall on our property.
We have also asked Mr. Elliot not to further encroach our property. Ifwe
are to sell the house Mr. Elliot would have to make arrangements with the
new owners in regards to his encroachment on the property.
Agreeing parties:
David Rowe:.'::(, ) """....~~Date: S - 9- 0.:3,
jaA~~ Date: S/g/03
Sarah Rowe:
Billy Elliot: 'b/~
Date: Sir 0/03
.
~
)-(~
IV
~ .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STillWATER ,
216 NORTH FOURTI-i STREET '
STillWATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
.CasoNo: ~.3~
Date Filed: ;.~ ~
Fee Paid: r '/(,1
Receipt No.: -.
FEES
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
Special/Conditional Use Permit <!/200
y.. Variance ' $70 200,
Resubdivision 00 ' ,
Subdivision* $100+50/1c
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment* $300
Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $ 70
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies, of
supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required,
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project 10/(7 N. 4..J.~.s+, ,Assessor's ParceIN~f~t'02/(.?o.
, 1) f2 (GEO Code)
Zoning District-t:)J ) , Description of Project 'is u: I d. d e Co Ie.. (';.. >'\ c:! oS +...: t~, Co<-=, " c.r& +e.
~ ~"'-'c..lc.. Cc.Jr"~r () ~'ID..,.J; h\J: lc.l f'-e.-tA:^i^J "uA.II,
"J hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply v
the permit if it is granted and used. "
Property Owner -gill~ ::s - !II,'of/ Representative
Mailing Address '~/O)l. I.{+~.s +. Mailing Address
City - State - Zip S -t~' \( "V,.. -te~. "4. M .s-5' ~'1s' L
City - State - Zip
Telephone No. (c,s- J) I..J ~ ~ - Co ~ 3 ., _ Telephone No.
, CO LL ~ "_"~
Signature -:6;tJ;f {/J;J1 "'.... """ '3""'30 Signature
(Signa ure is required) (Signature is required)
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lot Size (dimensions) so. · x c.~ I , Total Building floor area l. z.. (,."2f ' square,t
Land Area, ~ -..#.. -f(.,-_. '?oz..c;l"S~ Existing ',2.,t.'" ,square feet
Height of Buildings: Stories Feet Proposed I, 2..(,';{ square feet
Principal l.. '2.. "i" Paved Impervious Area 2.3.,s.-square feet
Accessory I 'i I No. of off-street parking spaces I
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12. 2002
-'-""
11 <<.,,)10
1---
4 3
oj po72)
.....-
2 1
!!
9
8
7 8
I PU73)
5
. l
5
.....- .....-
20 2' 22 23 24 25
'I ,1016)
,f'OI4) (
l PD71)
....."""
26 27
,J:
~
=>
"
"-- _ --r' ii
28 29 30
"""'I !!
t~)
o
~
~)
."...)
3
,
: ,
~
150
o WEST STILLWATER AVE
Ul
lI""')
150
150 '~11
m 6
.... *""') ~
4-,
o
"'
~
4
11
.....""" ,/:-'~ I~' 26 41"") m
tP,:, ;/ [ · ;;:r '_ ~.-!." ~
.. ....;.:1 i 0
z
l~
~ ..
~
'1 ~ " "'.2.. 2
I .-, /\
\
--
~A J,.#'''''''
*112)
n
.
50
~
,! ...-
...,..'" -- ...--rl 29 .... -30
20 23 25 26 . 28
"141) fP'''2) "143) 4P144) ~
*'.') )~\-<S:
S4tl'
., I
.,
Doc 311 ilS8J
., " ..
g
0 /'
.,
.-
i
-'- -r
5 1 I-
tfOO1I! W
~ W
" 0:=
I-
*134) en
:e
...........
50 64,76
"
"
.,
150
1
tP""')
60
150
2
J ""- .....'!,
el3l4
psI
I
[i!
~
1Il
~
....
..... .-,
7 6
*""')
~
~
tP""11
~
.......,.
50
50
50
J
\
'7' 2 ...-<~ ~ 100 2
P"," :V ~ p31
;\- ~ I
;.., ...~ ~ ' t '~ I ~
A~" 2m ~ 4.......-
":'"V 0:= m 100 ~
~'~ ~ 8
10
""50)
---
o
Ul
50
64,66
---
...........
1 51
."..,r
64.40
J -r-- --
I- R
0:= Ii
=> -
o
u.
11
12
."..'~
5
~
6
--
7
"""1
8
"""1
~
.,
~
........,.
50
50
50
50
50
50
64,30
---
C>
Ul
150 n 76
. 1 0 Ii! 2
m
."..., L ~ ~
Location Map 0 ~ 3 ~
m 2 ."..., """I
.....
64.22 ___
1 51 J:
""..,- !:;::
60
,.,.r
"...
lSO
o
Ul
WEST WILKINS
150
~
.....1
,l-
I
~
150
150
1
"""1
. R21W IUOW RI9W
T.l:lN
T.lIN
nON
T28N
T27N
RnW R2tW IUOW
Vicinity Map
o
144
150
t;
~
6/
,/ 150
'" 1
5 · ~53'
UTILITY ESMT
DOC 3182708
150 '" 150
... fIlO54)
"""1
4 .. 3
."...) a
;".A
150 150
Scale in Feet
~
~
1Nedrw*lg.l/lII.....d.c:anpil1tIorI
8nd Np!adudilln dlMd-w_!My
ItlP'WIIl___WMI*IgtonCOcftyctficM.
n...... ahDlIId lie .....,...,.....
~_.~Q:uIIy..na1
~r....,.-=--.
~:w~CounIy~OIlIcI.
~(al)43l).8lI75
PMlIldatlbMWonAS400lnIamlIIl1on
alINIIl\mlUgtl:hbNlry28.2003
MlpIllWUd: Aplit11,2003
t;
~
r..
~
~
7EET
-20 '/ 150
;/6 "I ~, J,.'41
.... .-,
. ,
150
o WEST
Ul
ASPEN
130
l-
I
5 4 2 t:l
...~ ~
150 150 I
4flD15)
4 "",.A 3 ~
150 150
R
~
lil
WEST ELM STREET
150
~
4
"""I
Planning Administration
Community Development Dept.
City of Stillwater
April 17 , 2003
.
To Whom It May Concern;
I am planning on a home improvement project at 1010 N. 4th St. consisting of
building a deck with stairway, concreting 364 square feet of my yard and building a
retaining wall to hold up an eroding hillside. I will temporarily move my 8'XlO' shed
onto my driveway for access to the work. I have an agreement with my neighbors to the
South to buy approximately 455 square feet of their property. This will leave them with
the required 10' between their house and the property line. The concreting will cover an
area where nothing grows except weeds and is an eyesore. The retaining wall will hold up
the eroding hillside making both yards more useable and esthetically pleasing. I will
extend my cedar fence to eliminate any fall hazards. I will move my shed against the wall
lengthwise freeing up room for the stairway to my deck. The stairs will be situated in a
comer of the yard next to the house and will be virtually not seeable from the street. It '
will consist of two platforms, a 90-degree angle turn, and a 180-degree switchback. The
exposed wood portions will be cedar, the stairs and platforms will be Andersen Fibrex
with a non-slip, non-skid coating, and the staircase will be supported by 4X4s embedded
in the concrete. There will be cedar railings on all areas exposed to any fall hazards. The
deck itself will also be Andersen Fibrex and will have a non-slip, non- skid coating. The
exposed wood portions will be cedar with a 4' cedar railing all around the edge. The size
of the deck will be 12'XI6' on the roof of the house centered on the two major support .
beams of the house. The building inspector has assured me the roofwill support the deck.
It will be attached to the support beamS in the roof. It will be located on the Southeast
comer of the roof. There will be a wall around the bottom of the deck between the deck
and the roof of the house to keep the wind from blowing under the deck and causing
adverse problems. It will not be noticeable from the road except from the front, looking
south on 4th St. or west on Wilkins St. Trees from other angles will mostly hide it. It will
be esthetically pleasing from the views that will be available from the road, and will not
adversely affect the look of the neighborhood. This is why believe I should be granted a
variance to perfvuu the work on my yard and deck.
Thank You Very Muc4,
LSJLrrj [)!f:18
Bil~ J. Elliott
f\lt ~O"l
.
-"')
.. ~
l)
..., i
-c I)
-Fi.
:<
t
v
,.
'~'i:
~a
-a
~
r:I)
'\1
~
- - -
....
"
.,
')
~ t
..l!
I)
+
11
tt:
"1
o
"j
'If
.:!
'"
)0
~([);' '"
~ \I
" \t
)(. '-
l) \-
f ~
rll~ ~~
L 1-- s ;,S-t:....~
....,S
\:,~\ y...
. ~ 0"
'l..l"'~";)
r 't>\\
/: ~I/
......, ('
.
.... -.. -... -- - --
?,op-r-t.,l- : ^ c L.v 01 ~'" ,r:~e..'C- ~ ~~d
Go'
,l
I
\
t
1.,4
;f c? l'
l~\~~ '" 011(1
~ ~\^ ~
\ 'Y-bD
c
0
, ..
fb~
V.
~
.J
l' ~
')" 11:
\\
'c
...
..r
-+
]
u .
~
J
-I-
;S
~
..
{l.
::!
.,
. ]
- "
- IJ
';
Vl
e
(s..t.Jo )
':'.Iy.f g... c!
l:r,-.. )
;;
.
[r.$~+;".S .\
ShG6
I...-c.a. +:-
1I/ffIJiiIiiJi_11
8 ' )f 10 I )(. C) I
,
E--IO
u
~ t
j:J
~+~
'. ~ U
.~
~ ~-
.,. e. "-"
tJ p. t-
r ]
. ~
-':I __
\& <.
wQ
<
( ~4i"~
lct'3~
..
i
f
A
-..
.
J
, i'>tyt:.C"""'l L-h..lo
" a.... i +r.. r...,.u, 'Co
'-'-.lk
-z.
>
I ~ 10 N. '-I...."..s +
z. . , ~', .
S;dc
5*'0' .
- -q..f~S+. - -
--",--~---
C. "C,.. -j r;.,. b J ..s + rr:.c, .J-
,,~
~
.~ +- ~,
i .rd,
~ .~-
j). 1. I
~ "']
a. ~ I
:1) :J ~
~ ~ '~i
~ '3' , v
.
,( c,-
o
\. J -v ,;: ~>4.
, ~ 11 0
....c: I" ...
~ V\ !) >Co
,~ ~
~-_, IS-/~t _
- -
t
\
t ~
~ ro-
l,:j 3
.....
,+ -
~'-'
, e.. >-.
I ~ ..
t A. :t
..., \l
~ ~
,-+ .t:
~
, : t)
~, '--t
.t.
~l 'ft"
.s 1 de 1....11:./1<...
.
1 \
"-/
'1
~ ~
\:.)
..
10'
(
.
..
,./ \)
r ."
\ .l~
~ c
C. ., ~
.,,,';
~~~r
( I~
ir;\/
il~
~
f'J f
(
.
t>,o>?.:>.scd
,
ot~ """
,,~ ()D"
}lC:'~~',,,,
\ / ~~
h\
1:. 1& :.s4;~ w ..J:l~~... .(r 'Pr~?er+7 L.~' o'l e.
c.,'
1
x
(\
~\O
,/'(
1J ..J.. .... t>
~. ~ "
L() X " "
on ;.!' ni'
'V '
1<f'3"
J 0 I 0 }J. L/ ....J t
'- . ~~ ~ ::t,.~-:;'
C...~. c.c.
'It,,~
e
P/-I4J.t (C..~
~.,.~ (I!lfl~+;"~)
,
__ 50
4 ~h 5-t.
"'"1\
\'"\
9(
'"
;;:
:t
.)
..
\-\
"\
~
)
r l'
~
,.
~
\
I
I
1
r
\
I
t
1
"\-
\) (
~
~ J
'1
"'"+01
.~
~ 1
~I
tJ
\Jr
;-'
V)
.. VI
\" ~ \
~ \9 ~ 1
J \ \ ~
..
\I
.~
Vi
..1..
· .-....J
...
tI
1
,
I
\
\
--..- - --- --
C CrI -rer () ./- s -t'r c. c:. +
-- ....... -.. -- -- ---- --. - .... ----
-- - ........ ----
t
,.
~
r
,
t
"
.
.
.
.
I
O~_"'I
~
\ ~ ..:^
"':
...r
,.p
'I
/ .
_*i
j
iI'
\'
~
\
\
/ ~ . .',
/~. . '<:t-o .,. '\ "
/ i\ · 1-:
///~,- ~- ..~.
"'\~
/ \." -
/~ \.'\....-
---- \,? ~ . 91
' t , "
~'~'\ ) <-- _:'-'---"', ! i
- r--::::. '_..___.~_-j 'l
- ~ t::-;-._~__ ...'.., , l
~ ... : ~::.:-:=-_..! 'i
-\, j i
111;:' . . i
; ~---;';j \
~'-l - I:
., I ;
:t:.
...
y
... --..---
/~\
\
\
cr-
~
..,
?
J)
l.:-
f\.)
~...
~
~
c;;.
f t
,
, ;
.- 1 ~
~
\ ;
I
rr-'
!
... .
I
,1 !
--
'\
\
~J
"
\, ~
,- '':.--. ,. --..--
~-;\ \1~
-\.1' ,
.. ~
.(. i
: !
.~
,
. ,
(,/
'7
.f i
i f
/
I
I
11
;' ~
1
j
I
I
\
!
j
-1:
.... 'f
/
... 1
,
--..;
i
-j
-- 1
i
,[I. _\
i .
: ~_...........u-,,--,-,~~
:' /
.
,.._c....!_~..,,,..;,;..;.,,;.~..
~~'''"-~.,~~.-,'-...,.''-~....'.,..-..-, ~
...."''''.''''.'''''i'__--...,'".,~~
''^'--<..,r...."''''''-,__.~. ,~.,
'>'>~_..~-".~~-,._-,~.,-...~.~".,~..~
ft'8~
-
!;>:""c..
.
.
,.__._~. .'-
.
i
,
t
~i{" .,..
}':
)~...-.
~
\
i
;
:
,
\ ~
\
r
f
,
i
,
.
,
i
.
.
;-.-.........-
I
, .' .'
~.
- ~ .~[:~(~r
'J I
--'-~ j~~~J
'-. '~"~' .~.,~.,,... ~
~;
n::r'.
~
,
I
~
I,
~
!
1
17
,
,}
n
.,
~
i
t
i, ...._."'._.
l'
l.~_~~~.,."
J
. . ! I -
., '
i;
- ......, >.,,.,',,",,- --.,_.~.
-' ~:I'-
'n
t
.; /,
.
r
1
, ;
~ j
H
n
.'
I ~
I .
~I
.J
~~ii " ~--
"
il; I '-.-
,.l.~
.>;""""'~~"'...........""--
.
-l "
.- ~....-
...I/
. ',-
'~"':
--- .. .
~-,,-.
,~A .
,.'
,."
,/
..,Ii
0/'"
/"
!
.
.
.
.
"...
.M,
;;
~ 0
i;~", "
T'~ ~', ."
."
"
1"
"
.r:"", ..i - ;)
fr?"
-... .-
"
.
"
\;
J
( "
"
.;
\
j
.'
.,<'
.,r
',;: t.
'''~ ~ ...
1..
.,~
/t
~
'.
.
.
.
.
.,
,
\
.,b
~
II rf'"i:lmn \)'ul
.
'f
I' I , J, rrmll~
.
.
.
"
.
~..
...
.. <,<'
:~-..,..;,;
,..
'" '
i
'\,
~
"~~"""!"';'~';.' ,., '.,[
,..!,,~,,-'--''-~,UlF;;'~'" ...'....~!,'
.""'.""'-".
."... ..:,~,",.'--" ",.,."
''-...,
. lII/I!!!.' '~""';'
U~"~'.. ,...... ~;~;l'
. . '.';.
c~..,
.. .
" ....'"
~\~,,4'
~
~
,f_
.
~
,
.'~~
"'",
.;..
i
..",.;:,,,Yf~'.
-' ~ .. .
"~C~#~
,<-~~
<,,~:,,>Jjj~"
",..".<.,"~...~
,"""~_.",,_.:....,;,, '~"---""';
.r'~'kf':_~;'~~-":'<":""'-
t'
"~I'''o!l~''''-I
"*,,
--
.
~
.'
.
.
r
lVe;~'h hots
FI-~-.d<-
~'
~~;j:,. 'i., .
/!~\(
'b
,1"1-
'^ ;V ,.,/
A. I {,\,. '}..-'.~'"
, vt\C...+;.,., l c.-"J"
If) :f J. fo' ~...".. ".
J/~: '!ok ~ u.-- t ltJ' ,;
~ 2 \ I \ \-~ \
~ L-:I ~.J\ \ 1\ 1...1 ~ll
~ \ \.-L i . I I
Li \.-..'1 .\ _ \ J . ~ ~ I '....J
N-c.w ~.-t-..I\'^~ \.J..1l '
- -
--,~
. 1 -" ~
,<.\...:,,;, .
.
~
-
\ t4e.~
\ S'u.J
t..~ e.,.....,... fII n
\ \ ,1
~
,~
/'I f:A.J c.o 1\ " of do {' e:-
~
x..t') 'b
~..r, t!'lOf'
lV ~'
y~'?
\ \
[. j S ~~..f"t"j
C. Clf\ (, {.. J(~
-
L.
.
Page 1 of 1 ~
Sue Fitzgerald
From: Pat & Michael Sobieski
Sent: Thursday, May 08,20037:17 AM
To: Sue Fitzgerald
Subject: Case No, V/03-38
Susan,
.
After looking at the proposed roof deck design and looking at the current house and its location, we oppose
allowing the variance. We feel that the proposed design in the small corner lot is inappropriate, The requested
setback of 9' 7" versus the city requirement of 30" is too close to the street and sidewalk.
Thank you,
Michael & Pat Sobieski
1022 3rd St N
.
.
5/8/2003
.
.
.
Page 1 of 1
Sue Fitzgerald
f.1 fJ
C' \/'-
From: Pat & Michael Sobieski
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 7:21 PM
To: Sue Fitzgerald
Subject: FW: Case No. V/03-38 ,
I received a notice that the homeowner is contesting the Planning Commission decision and that there will be a
hearing this coming Tuesday. I still oppose granting the variance. I support the Planning Commission NOT to
allow this variance, I hope that the City Council will support the Planning Commission's decision and our desire
that this development NOT occur in our neighborhood, This is a very small lot on busy comer and I believe that
the proposed modification will detract from our neighborhood. I strongly support the work. the Planning
Commission does and the process that they use to uphold the rules of the city that we are all supposed to follow.
I will be traveling this coming week for work, so I will therefore not be able to attend. I hope that this email will
adequately represent my view on this matter.
Michael Sobieski
1022 3rd St N
-----Original Messag~
From: Pat & Michael Sobieski [mailto:msobieski@attbi.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 08,20037:17 AM
To: sfitzgerald@ci,stillwater,mn,us
Subject: Case No. V/03-38
Susan,
After looking at the proposed roof deck design and looking at the current house and its location, we oppose
allowing the variance. We feel that the proposed design in the small comer lot is inappropriate, The requested
setback of 9' 7" versus the city requirement of 30" is too close to the street and sidewalk.
Thank you,
Michael & Pat Sobieski
1022 3rd St N
6/2/2003
.'"
~ Memo
.
.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council M J
Steve Russell, Community Development Director If./
May 28,2003
Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Request for Garage
Variance located at 1323 2nd Street South. Case No. V/03-41.
The Planning Commission reviewed the request at their meeting of May 12, 2003 and
voted 4-4 (no decision) regarding the variance. A neighbor to the rear of the proposed
garage felt the variance would adversely effect air, light and the attractiveness of their
property causing a hardship.
Recommendation: Decision on request.
Attachment: Applicationlstaff report and minutes.
...14
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
1,#.
e;
Case No. V/03-41. A variance to the rear yard setback (5 feet required, 3'1".
requested) for construction of a two car garage with storage above located at
1323 2nd Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential District. David and
Jeanne Kensler, applicants.
Mr. and Mrs. Kensler requested a variance to the rear yard setback for the
construction of a two car garage with storage above. The existing one car garage
is in disrepair and needs to be demolished. A variance is needed because of the
location of the house. The house is situated too close for anyone to back out of
the garage safely. Beside the house there is a tree, a fence and a wall that could
also obstruct access to the north parking stall.
John Leonard, was concerned about the changes of character to the back yard.
Mr. Leonard is fine with the width of the garage, but he is concerned about the
height of the garage. He was also concerned about the increase drainage on his
property.
, ,
.
.
.
David & Jeanne Kensler
1323 S. Second Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 439-0591
May 14, 2003
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear City Council Members,
IN RE: Case No. V/03-41
Thank: you for reviewing our request to appeal the 4-to-4 decision regarding the variance
to the rear yard setback (3' 1 "). We felt compelled to appeal the decision made on May
12,2003 because it appears we were denied approval of the variance due to the height of
the building, which we are in compliance with. In addition, we felt compelled to appeal
because the decision to deny our request presents a permanent hardship, given the
difficulty of maneuvering vehicles in and out of our planned garage with limited space.
Our new garage will be six feet wider and eight feet taller than the current garage. The
variance was requested in an effort to allow easier access to our new garage. As you
know, the height of our planned garage is not of issue, but rather, the issue is the distance
between our new garage and our neighbor's lot.
It is our understanding that our neighbor is concerned about the potential loss of
afternoon sunlight, as our new garage will be taller than the current one. With respect for
our neighbor, it is understandable that a new building presents a possible difficult change.
However, since the height of the garage cannot and should not be of issue, it is confusing
why building at 3' 1" from the property line is. It would seem likely that the difference of
two feet would be minimal in respect to the amount of afternoon sun loss. In addition,
the view of our garage from our neighbor's property will be on the northwest side of their
lot. Since our neighbor's pool is located in the center and southwest portion of their
backyard, loss of sunlight to their pool area should be minimal. In regard to drainage,
when our neighbor's pool was put-in their backyard was built-up. Since our backyard is
fiat and our new garage will have gutters, all water will remain on site. Lastly, the only
view from the inside of our neighbor's house to the backyard is from one upstairs
window. In closing, we understand our neighbor's concerns; however, we believe the
difference of two feet has a far greater impact on our daily garage use than the impact on
our neighbor's summer use of their pool area and backyard.
We greatly appreciate the opportunity to present our proposal to the Council through the
appeal process. Thank you f~m:! consideration.
Sincerely, ~
~
~. ...
.. ~-
~-
, }
r ~i. .water
~ - - ~
--- -, ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
VARIANCE
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider an appeal of the Planning Commissions
decision on a request from David and Jeanne Kensler for a variance to the rear yard
setback (5 feet required, 3' 1" requested) for construction of a two car garage with
storage above located at 1323 2nd Street South in the RB, Two Family Residential
District. Case No. V /03-41. .
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Publish: May 23, 2003
.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
, ~
Ii!
134.4 ~~V 134.4
BURLlNGTO/tJ STRE~l
i>f3512O ~ -15 J
134.4
13404
o
20
.
/' fI'''''
"
5 EAST
I-
W
W
0::
I-
C/)
~. : ~b '3U
f'C"( .....0 '3'" t
8U~P~ ~ J- ~
t
-J
t
0/
f
~
134,.1
o
0::
:c
I-
17
....,
134.3
~,
f
~
1304.3
15
J:
I-
::>
o
C/)
134.3
Ii!
~,.
..
1:w.3~
,::' ~
60 /
.1lI ~"'.'
L:" .~~
( '~fI'lO'~ ~ :
~ 13. ,~'\
wi, p~~':
60
Ii
.
I
I
I
i
tfItot)
,
:~ }-
~
.
'3.
'34
\~
;"") 4
N Ii!
,
fI"~
133.95
~-
10
.'2$)
133.9
Ii!
:c
c(
rn
o
9
.'24)
133.85
s
60
60
134325
12
t
I
I
I
J
11
10
9
"""'"
8
--
1~ I."
11
'34.4
."...,
87.2 f
.,
6
.....,
'34.4
20 pit)
OU
19
.. I -{853
""". 18
.. ~ 1'85.3
~-i
17 .138)
..
85.3
I
Ills
I~
87.2 ,'--
(0137....,-1 7
. t 87.2
I ~ 87,', 8
I
ftPO'O) I
1
/t
'34.2
134.2
134~
9
....
134":
134.2
11
....
'34.2
12
'34.2
3
4
.,.
5
6
.t--
!II
11
2
JJ,., t Ii!
~,,-
;. ~~" ~
,.
134"
.,.
IUIW R20W RI9W
9
"..
I ~:
:~
:w:
'34 0
Z ~ f3U
:..,~~ ~~ ~
'34 ~ 4 ~ '34.2
J,,,,, ~ Ii! w..., ~ ~~
t t '34.2 '34.2 t Ill'
'33.~ i" ~o/ ~ql p.i
'339 ! ~ ~ I~ '34.2; ~ j l3.. ~ J:
~ 1 J.",. Ii! 0 II ~I' ~ ~ 1-, ~!;
'33.85 C/) '34.2 U '342 t 0
5 ., -, ,.yI ~ ~ C/)
II Ii! fI"221 Ii! 5t0094) 12 eo $ Ii! Ii!
;hC083 I A DDliioN : '~~J l' '30 __:"
Ii! 7 ~ 6 ~ ~ .. E 1/l>.,,; ~
'338 133.8 6 0 .:""~ 'U 1"1.1 6 0 ~
C S A H X CITY OF STILLWATER ./ EAST ORLEANS
- ..."-.... . CITY OF OAK PARK HEf~ 65TI" STREET N
~ ~ '34l" I ~.-- ... t ""W r.~ .t. ~ 0 t 70 12 tl
~ g 2 ; - ......., 11 2" ~ J en 11 II
~ t t """" ""'" t ...."~1
r3 I, · d I ~ 2' I ~ -! ~ ~ 111
~1 wI 6en9,./
CWCW" 9 4 ,,;;C
I I OIKPKHTS
5 ~ ~ 8 5 ~ S "LlWATER 8 , I
~ ill ! """" _',. ~
1- ",- 7 6" g t 7~
4 VACATED ST CROIX ST DOC 34
I
II g ST CROIX ST PER PlAT
i ~I il VACATED ST CROIX ST DOC 339471
.~ t I
Location Map r t 1 !II
~) I 2
J 87.2
134.4
7
""'"
16
""""
134.3
15
""""
134.3
14
4J'0121
t
0/
II
t 87.'.
;10/.....,.
@
2~
11
...J
~
){Z)
,~
:~
li!U~
~, 1~ .~.~..._ ~
134.2
17
p711
''''.2
16 0
,:' ~
134.2 /sl S
cj
Dm
DIN
134.:
10
"..
134.:
IU1W JUJW IUOW
134.4'
1
fIP"
134.2-
?
'34.2
3
fIP"
Vicinity Map
.....' 11
134."
87.2
87.2
134.3
13
~11l
134.25
~~
'34\.
23\
_I Ii!
134.2
~
~ ~
i
22
fIP""
1'"~
" .
I
134~
4
.,..
134.2
5
"""
6
.,.,
t.L
w__.-.
"'r
.
134.4
134.2
20
fIP""
'34.2
19
_,
134.2
II
Ii!
Ii!
~
il i
.,.."
S
IL
0:
~
t I
I I
134';
7
8
....
10
o
163
Ii! 3':3
8
-,
'34"
,}l,.,
2
I
I
10
."...,
12
11
Scale in Feet
~
2
ltWdrawing ..U.....d.canpllIiDIi
lnd~d.....___1Mr
~1n___w.,.....Cl:ulIyoflll:..
n.lbwIino...lf_I.-t......~
.......,. w..........,CaunIy.1'Illl
~far~_____
Scvc.:w~~~omr..
Phcln.(651)43Oo6IT5
PMoIl "-U b-.:llll'l AS4Q) WonMllan
-..nI Uwough: '*'-r 2lI, 2Oll3
YIp........ Api!Zl2Oll3
,.
4
9
"..."
Ii!
9
.....
134.3
16
134.3
134.3
'34"
Ii!
10
_,
134.3
11
"'"
,"'..
15
...."
~ J
.,
': !
'"
'34"
134.3
'j
....'
Ii!
13
I~,;~
EASl
MARSH
'34
~o
W
~ g:
C/)
eo - 00 -1........~.!9, . 60 g
fO~ f)t..:' '" OR f L1-~ iE> 4
... ~ #"ll ~ 0::
I-
60 .50 so, sa.S 50 en
13...2 ~ 134.2
4ll-, ~ d ;..., :!
, .
10
.'14)
'34
9
~1l3)
~
~l
"'It'
~
~ $
~ il
t~
i l-
Ii! C/)
0::
ii:
'34
134.2
Ii!
19
~{z)
U
Ii! L.....
134.2
8
*'12)
~
1301.2
II
Woos.
Ii!
~
-l ~
4
5
f!ll
J !II
t
J
6
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
SHLLWATER
64TH
STREET ~
60
t I
I I
t 1
I 2
12
--r
. ,
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. V/03-41
.
Planning Commission Date: May 12, 2003
Project Location: 1323 2nd Street South
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: David and Jeanne Kensler
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: A variance to the rear yard setback (5' required, 3'1" proposed) for construction
of a two car garage with storage above.
Discussion: The applicants are requesting a variance to the rear yard setback to construct a two car
garage. The existing one car garage is in disrepair and needs to be demolished. A Variance is requested
because of the location of the house. The house is situated too close for anyone to back out the garage
safely. It is staff's recommendation that the Commissioners definitely visit this site to determine if a
two-car garage could get access to both stalls. Beside the house there is a tree, a fence and a wall that
could also obstruct access to the north parking stall.
Recommendation: Denial
.
Conditions of Approval:
Should the Commission approve the request, staff recommends the following conditions of approval:
1. The garage shall be similar in architectural style, materials and color as the existing house.
2. All revisions to the approved project shall be reviewed by the Community Develvpment
Director.
Findings:
1. That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists. In this context,
personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are not
hardships justifying a variance.
2. That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity; and that a variance, if
granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
3. That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not
materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the
Comprehensive Plan.
Attachments: Application form, letter from applicants, site plan and elevation drawings.
CPC Action on 5/12/03: 4-4 No Decision
.
. J -, / .;. L1 .--'-e> c,J J'/!-Aq tj --r (5;# j'V) y
fI . () III! 1f1-,vL f' I 5 jJ. KJ €IJ TV "-u c4 -( F7. - / /
v (,y -r;i~ q~qH #P7/5 IJ~~-t' /~ P~'yRo.#t'.c:
Pi! t'S ,,#"' .51 rf'. /" / . ' . .
Ihw.o J · +0 6"'.p SltJJ'. II- I 5' ho f- ~~/,<J/~/J,J5/-e /9rvp /5"
. . .4 e !4-,.,- / Jf/ J ".., l I ,. / '
U.v S/J-F~ , .
1i, /s 'Jj.,uJ'f-l IS /?,FI-- U//P.P,4Ni::J If P"<: t?eep/ /l- s/"j '/.,
~ t/I ~ r:; If1e 11-7 -('
7h<' /V~.v f~/lj.p::7= II-~< C~,eN IS- /J ItutJ CH<~~/J;?y
til .; all1>r 51u1l~ e A-dbU-(, I3-eUf(j? f' or #-t> //v(jjp j; .?OC/J-~dA;
COi' /IU j-o COI"I-P ()u';' r/1te.1J M . /~-/o 7i e )"Ao:? ~ CA?eMI!' S
I) !I/M': r #, p . ~tV:' k S/1/~ >l F&clo/Z-/ /I- S h ~^'~...;./ ~,c>
(JJ //wJ ou f- //VI" /J / /1/ e 1..u14}
9~p
.
.
: &
"An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
ACTION REQUESTED FEES
Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
. " ,)( Variance ,., . $('0/200
:R~slibdivision ' . $100 ',', .
Subdivision* $100+50110
Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $509
Zoning Amendment* $300
Planning Unit Development ~ $500
Certificate of Compliance $ 70
caseN~:l1'~
Date Filed: ~
Fee Paid: ~
Receipt No.: ~
PLANNING ADMlrlllSTRATION APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ~TILl.WATER . ..
. 21~. NORTH FOURTH STREET '
. STILLWATER, MN 55082
The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and aCCuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted In connection with any application. All supporting material (I e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies 0'
SUpporting material is Teq!Jlred. If application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) caples ot
SUPPorting mater/al is required.
A site plan Is required with applications. Any Incomplete application or supporting material will delay
application process. .?
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 0 0 q? "
Address of Project l3 J 3 Sf,lJ 11 d':'~ )/- AsseSSO~SParcel N03~/~ ..
"l7 (J..... /J /1 (!3.EO Code)
Zoning District 't\ '-I Description of PmJect...1l e .1" Mep h-7 ~ .v f Qr b'nA' A C; <:
Signature
{Signature Is required}
.- ~.:.... ~
Stories
Feet
. ,square f.
, square feet
. square feet
H:\mcnamara\Sheila\pL.ANApp.FRM Apn112,2002
, .
.
N
(()
N:
(()
0:
L:
0:
u:
N w:
(()
(f)
.
0
~
N
lO
N
lO
N
o.
LOi
.
0,
lO .
o
lO
I
1-:
::::>:
0:
(f):
Location Map
lO
r-..:
-'I:t
o
lO
o
lO
o
lO
lO
N
lO
N
o
lO
lO
N
lO
iN
10
llO
i
: g0094)
50 ..~. 58.5
~ - 13
~
-t--- t
~
r:/)
o
132--3
S. /,' .Ie-I'
'--' - .
60
i
i
i
i
I
,
I
I
__ .___._.L__~._,
50
1342
~99)
134.2
19
134.2
1 J3098)
134.2
11097) 0
LO
_n ----
134.2
2 LO
15 N
134.2 LO
N'
1ffi096)
134.2
14
134.2
1 ~095)
134.2
- cD-1
..
12
60
134.2
"
. .
Ll/7--5/3
LO
l'-
'I:t
o
LO
o ~
LO,
t
',1"1
o
H
--- .. -t
~
Q
o
LO
r:/)
..
LO~
N _~
~
~
U
~
~
LO
N
o
LO :
N
~.
<0,
(V') :
13
13
13,
13.
13.
.-----,
I
!
i
IUIW RlOW RI9W
TI:!N
J~
~nlN
noN
12
mN~~
=D=
R22W RlIW Rlow
1
1:
Vicinity Map
.J
l.'~'-:'-~
I\~~~~t
s'(
o
50
12
Scale in Feet
J
ltll.,,"I\..."'..I"-I.....""f1'Iln'\PllMIOII
<M>d"'~dW>d_tb...lll~
appearin..~_.WastwlglonCountyotl\Col"
Tho:<irll'MllOshouIdblluHdforrllf.......
purJ)Usnonly WH/IIIlQIQIlCounly.."",
rO:.I>OO"'~fOl'~yllllllX..a.::iel
SQur~ WalhlllQlOnCOunCy ~1,*lCe
~(651143o-a15
PIJ<cel4ol1.bMedl)llAS<<lO~
CUfanlltlfOl.lgl'l FetlrualyZ8.Z003
u....pronted ApnIII 2OCI3
5-(~ c' -f)
-.........
~
-t..
)"-'
~
I ;-
: " '
,
~--
<-
- ~\
V) . .
-~~
~-
S-
-.:t--- - (Y)
-~ u~
~ \b' (,'- ~ ~
~ ~ ~ t ~ C
w~ r,'~- ~ p
'.J ~ ~. <A ~ ~
,,~. '" ~ I"
(,. ~ ~ ~ .......
('. ......... '1-.. e . '::h
~ld('\, ~,c.
"\ '-1\ ~ -k ('.
t'- ~ ~ i\ ~
~~f\l S\_
~ '- ~ \-'
'-<~ ",' ~ V)
___ 9 s F- I
I --
. -I
"'-.
'<
~
^
~
..:l tv /J
'7S' Fl-
..
5 -f
/3;23
Sou tit 2 ""''51-
.-
-..
,-'"\
~
~
l'\
.......
f'.
._~J
'^
VJ~.
~~
(I:)
f'\
~~.
~. ~-~-
1:
c
V\
<'\
.- \
I '
I.
.J '5 FI-
-+D ~
110"5<' /~
'i-
o
I
('i
\!
~ I
:i
{ ,
"
i
-~
~ fW/;';(-:~
.l!-: )'
.,.~
pI< /It;e
\,.V It 'I
,
i
J'
"
!
/.'
---('
. :
j
. .;.
.k-
~~
;).~ F-r
{]'
~
~I"
\1
'\-
, !
::j:::.
~ ~ .
~\ .,. W !;\ ~.
l':) 1"1 ~ Q ~. c.
l":I'''' ;:t'^
--... (. -'-f....". _ ,"'~ -"\
'-" ..... / "\... ~ - .
,,'. . l0 trll ....
'c....~-() ....." _ ~. -\J. !..V! !t1
~ .. f\ _. ~_ .- (\_---J ~
~:::> ~ - ~ ==1:. -"1'-
_.) V\
. .
.
--
~
-t..
J-v
",.
"\-.
V
Ff
'rd
~tJiJ )i
0'-'/
1+0 .; ) ..
,4/i>,,(1
I) eM /L
.-
------
I:
r . ( .....)
S' /' '::.N- :\:) '" ~
_Y - ~o !
~'t I
:l t~-
"<- :t -
"
--
+
.
.
.
. .Traditional Garage With Loft PlaJl 1Ll)84-1
Page 2 of)
\
,,f,,.
I.!::'-
,/~7
~'.:
,//;'
./f'
/"
._::7}';"
- f-...........................-.-...........-...........-..................-......~.-.............
''''T
r--'-!:.::::::.~".':.....
~
'':'= Il"-l:'-:':; -
....." .'I.'''I'I\~ '.'....'.'.
.......I.It\.~Jjlltt~~{.:j '~,....."'..t.
.('fA'~ :
l .~(:;'f(.m:
'::t-
~l
I
,v. ,".l~~; "OW;
t .~... ....~ .c,.
~:J '.<~:2t~~;~..<,
.: ."......~,
rr":"X~';~,<~!iiL;'~~;'r~b:;"~;;:;";:~'(l<~h::.L'.' ..
.;;: ~:x.:::.:~;;.;:~:.:( ~:;~:.;::~::;;:;~~':.~~
:::. >:
:.:: 7..,f....:: .... I .
/ >....--,j~ ,:.i.;::..~.~:..'.^._.~~......'?;...;:~ ;
H" t:'''.''''I;~- .. .. , ::~
5'~/t ' ~: ~'~\?,~K~~;;:,i!;~~;:~t: !~V
. . .:. or:.~:.'..::~~.'.~'~"~':.':~:.'.':':-.'~',:'.~,),,:.': '~~::,
1.,,,L~~~"L.;."_L
"^ l.
'~'l'
r1i
;
q
cn()SG~SECTION
.........-. ~~:~;~.-.;~-~.......
{;~~R "Hr -:t'~~}fJ
~,",-..'...'.'.;:,.,..,....
.. .'_'.' ..~...""~_".l'''''''''''''''~~<:A~w"""""",''''''''''_J.."..v'_-,':,' .-:,".,'--.
.a.;k ;
.:-<<-t ___",,,,n'.' ",., ". .. ......,w.'..,w,.,.,.,.,.,.,.. ,.,<.. ..:....':
, FlOOH PLAN .
otV? po () 12
'...'.!.I4dl" .' . /_~'", b'1-2
W1al)', .. ,_. ;Z:L r,
.~~~~~,~""a._If~j
AOOE .1fY,;~-m ,,'1l ;
,,', \t<<u.t(((((of<<<A:(.(.,(<(<<(<<~~.t(.t.N.<<.,<< ""
fJ,OOfj ~Wf;.,t.: M,l Sf
,,,,,-
....I~
~:
~
... ...............'."."".....'w'J
P1.r.t4 UO:.
.~ ..
It .\:' .IMCllflfMH.,..
.,Behm '
~,.!lesig~ ' i ," '~~~~,..::' ~~:::"'"
.. ~:IA.RN.lf~ &,ji~~,~~~ ,~~i~\:~~~.~~"3,~.Q,,SF
Price: $129.95 (for 4 plansets)
http://www.bellllldcsigll.COIII/ enragel 11 m Is/984.hlml
4/12/2003
John & Coni Leonard
1322 S. First Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 439-5726
Il'i ?l~~ N . ~l.L
/
$ \ 2 ~ 03
~ &t~t)l\
Co ~\.~Sl\
'~
.
\ \tM. ~1
May 12, 2003
~
(/ lu~6JJ
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
216 North Fourth
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
IN RE: Case No. V/03-41
Please consider this letter as our objection in the matter ofthe variance request submitted
by David and Jeanne Kensler for a variance to the rear yard setback (5 feet required, 3' 1"
requested) for construction of a two car garage with storage above, located at 1323 2nd ..
Street South.
Our property is located at 1322 South First Street and our back yard directly abuts Mr. &
Mrs. Kensler's property. We have a back yard pool and a fence approximately six feet in
height separates our property from the Kensler's. The distance between the present
structure on the Kensler's property, a 1 car - 1 story garage, is approximately 3" 1", the
same variance distance that is requested for the new structure.
The reason for our objection is the new structure is going to be at least seven feet wider
than the existing structure, and in addition have an entire second story, making it twice as
high as the existing structure. The new structure will overshadow our property and block
out the afternoon sunlight from our pool area, fIower gardens, trees and. shrubs.. We
recognize that under the city code we do not have the right to object to the size ofthe new
structure, but we would like to exercise our right as a property owner to oppose the
structure from sitting any closer to our property line than allowed by city ordinance to
attempt to negate as much as possible the overshadowing of our property.
We have discussed our concerns with Mr. & Mrs. Kensler, and they do understand our
opposition to this variance request. We respectfully request that the Planning
Commission takes our concerns under considerations.
.
,-
05/12/03
. "\
.
.
.
15:56
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM ~ 17153864371
ZONING
'I.
Subd. 12. RB-two-family district. RB-.two-fam-
ily districts sball be regulated as follo,lJ's:
(1) Permitted buildings and uses. In the RB-
two-family district the following buildings
and uses and. their accessoxy buildings
and uses are permitted:
a. All buildings and uses permitted in
the RA-one-family district as set forth
in subdivision 11(1) of this section.
b. Dwelling houses, each occupied by
not more than two familit>5.
e. 'lYPe I home occupation use permits.
(2) Permitted uses with special use permits.
In the RB-two-family district, the follow-
ing buildings and uses and their acces-
sory buildings and uses may be permitted
by "'....e"~al use permit from the city coun-
cil:
a. Type II, home occupation permits.
b. Multi-family dwellings.
c. Reserved.
(8) Accessory uses. In the RB district uses and
buildings incidental to permitted or spe-
cial permitted uses sball be subject to the
following regulations:
a. The maximum lot coverage of all
accessory buildings including at-
tached and detached private garage~
and other accessory buildings shall
be 1,000 sqUaN! feet or ten percent of
the lot area, whichever is less.
b. Tho total ground cove:oage. of the
accessory buildings shall not. exceed
the ground coverage of the principal
building.
c. No more than two accessory build-
ings, one private garage and one
other accessory building, 120 square
feet maximum) shall be located on a
residential premises.
,
SU})p. Ne>. IS
CD31:1G.5
NO.012
(;102
i 31.1
d. An accessory building shall not be
designed or used for human habita-
tion, business or industrial accee..
sory use.
(4) Accessory dwelling unit. An accessory
dwelling unit is defined as a second dwell-
ing unit on one lot, detached from a pri-
mary single-fl'lm;ly residence and clearly
secondary to a primary residence. Acces-
sory dwelling units are permitted special
uses in the RB district subject to the
followi..ng regulations:
a. Lot size must be at least 10,000
square feet;
b. The accessory dwelling unit may~ be
located on second floor above the
garage;
C. The acressory dwelling unit must
abide by the primary structure set-
backs far side and rear setbacks;
d. The accessory dwelling unit must be
located in the rear yard of the pri-
mary residence or be set back. from
the front of the lot beyond the mid-
point of the primary residence;
e_ Off-street parking requirements for
an apartment and single-family res-
idence (foUl' spaces) must be pro-
vided;
f. Maximum size oftha accessory dwell-
ing unit is 800 square feet;
g. The application requires design re-
view fOT consistency with the pri-
mary unit in design, detailing and
materials;
h. The height may not exceed that of
the primary residence; and
i. Both the primaJy and accessory dwell-
ing unit must be connected to munic-
ipal sewer and water services and be
located on an improved public street.
05/12/03
15:56
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM? 17153864371
NO.012
~03
, .
g 31.1
STILLWATER CODE
.
J
(5) Developmen.t regulation.s. Development regulation.c; in the RB district are as follows:
4. Area, setbacks and height regulations:
Single-family .. Duplex Multifamily
1. Maximum building height:
Main building 21{2 stories and 2112 stories and 21/2 stories and
35 feet 35 feet 35 feet
Accessory building One storyl One storyl One storyl
20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
2. Minimum lot area:
Single-family '1,500 squa.re 10,000 square 15,000
feet feet square feet
Minimum lot area per d\velling 7,500 square 6,000 square 5,000 square
feet feet feet
3. Minimum lot width 50 feet 75 feet 75 feet
4. Minimum lot depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet
5. Manmum lot coverage 30 percent 40 percent 40 percent
6. Minimum yard requirements:
Front yard 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet
Side yard 10 feet or 10 10 feet 10 r~t .
percent of lot
width
Corner lot street:
Side yard 30 feet SO feet 30 feet
Rear yard 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
7. Frontage requirements For all buildings at least 35 feet of frontage on an
improved public street
b. Exceptions:
1. Front yard. Where a uniform
yard setback exists which is.
less than 30 feet, any building
or structure erected, structur-
ally altered or enlarged may
conform to the established set-
back but in no case shall a
setback less than 20 feet be
allowed. Where a uniform front
yard setback does not exist, then
the minimum required setback
shall be the average of the set-
back of the two adjacent main
buildings; or if there is only one
adjacent main building, the set-
back of the Wl4;'1 building Qhall
govern, but in no case shall a
setback less than 20 feet or
greater than 30 feet be re-
quired.
2. Corner ya.rd. For cornel' lots
where the corner side yard set-
back or front yard setback. for
the main building on the a~a-
cent lot on the same street is
less than the required setbacks,
then the corner lot side yard
setback for the proposed struc-
ture may conform to the set-
back for the acliacent main build-
ing but in no case shall a setback
less than 20 feet be allowed.
.
Supp. No. IS
CD31:16.6
.
.
.
/.Jd5/12/03
f"
15:56
r1AGHUSON LAW F I Rt1 -7 17153864371
"
ZONING
3. Side yard. When there is an
attached garage on one Bide of
the dwelling, the garage set-
back is five feet, provided that
no habitable floor area is closer
than ten feet from the proyo:.. LJ
line and provided that the ga-
rage is a minimum of 15 feet
from the nearest structure on
the adjacent lot.
4. Side and rear yard. An acces.
sory structure located entirely
in the rear yard or located in
the side yard at least six feet
from the main building shall
have a minimum side and rear
, yard setback of five feet.
\ (Ord. No. 653, 10-21-86; Ord. No. 669, 9-15-87;
Ord. No. 850, fi 1, 10-7-97; Ord. No. 860, ~ 1,
5-19-98; Ord. No. 860A, ~ 2, 5-21.02)
~
SOOd. 19. RCL.low density multiple-family res.
id2n.tiaJ district. RCL-Iow density multiple-family
residential districta shall be regulated as follows:
(1) Permitted uses. Uses permitted by a spe-
cial use permit in the RCL district are as
follows:
a. Townhouses, group or row houses.
b. Public education, religious and insti-
tutional buildings.
c. Bed and breakfast establishments, if
at least 900 feet from another bed
and breakfast use.
(2) Alxessory uses. Acceesozy uses in the RCL
district are as follows:
a. Customary home occupations.
b. Off-street parking and loading facil-
ities.
c. Private recreation facilities.
(3) Area requirements. Area requirements in
the RCL district are as follows:
a. Minimum lot area sbnll be 20,000
square feet.
b. Minimum lot area per dwtllling unit
shall be 7.000 square feet.
Supp, No, 13
CD31:16.7
~iO. 012
[;104
/
i 31.1
c. Maximum building height shall be
35 feet.
d. Minimum open space per dwelling
unit shall be 1,500 square feet.
(4) Recreation facilities. Recreational facili-
ties in the RCL dietrict are the same as
subdivision 15(4) of this section.
(5) Yard a.nd setback requ.irements. Yard and
setback requirements in the RCL district
are as follows:
a. Front yard: 35 feet
b. Side yard.: 50 feet
c. Rear yard: 50 feet
d. Accessory buildings shall conform to
the above requirements for principal
buildings.
e. No principal building may be con-
structed within 50 feet of another.
(6) Landscaping and. screening. Landscaping
and screening in the RCL district shall be
8S follows:
a. All sites when. fully developed shall
be completely graded so as to ade-
quately drain and dispose of all sur-
face water, stormwater and ground-
water in such a manner as to preclude
large scale erosion and unwanted
ponding.
b. All sites when fully developed shall
be landscaped according to a plan
approved by the city council. The
landscaping plan shall specify the
Bize, type and location of all trees
and shrubbery and the location of all
sodded areas.
c. Parking areas containing four or more
spaces which are adjacent to or across
the street from a residential district
shall be 8CrSElued to a height of at
least four feet by shrubbery, wood or
masonry materials.
I",J>
'-::.
~,.
'...-.;
"
'c;!
~
.
.
John & Coni Leonard
1322 S. First Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
May 29, 2003
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear City Council Members:
IN RE: Case No. V/03-41
We have given great consideration as to whether we should respond to the appeal
submitted by David and Jeanne Kensler regarding the denial for the rear yard setback
variance in question, or if we should just allow the appeal to go through in the interest of
being a good neighbor. We have come to the conclusion that we feel strongly that the
reason why municipalities have zoning laws is to protect the value and personal
enjoyment of all property owners and since we are the neighbors directly affected by this
variance we feel a need to restate our position.
As a property owner we enjoy our backyard. We entertain in our backyard, our kids
spend almost every summer day in our backyard, and many evenings we just like to sit in
our backyard. It was one of the reasons we chose to buy our house seventeen years ago.
We have looked at other larger garages that been built in the neighborhood over the last
few years, and while they may look very attractive from the front, we find, (especially
when they are built on the property line), the structures are very imposing on their
neighbor's backyard. In addition, although the previous owners may have built up our
backyard when the pool was installed over twenty years ago, the fill has settled and all
water in this area eventually drains down hill towards the river. Even ifrain gutters are
installed on our neighbors' new garage, the proposed structure has a steep roof that will
create rapid run off in heavy rains, and there is no way they can guarantee that we will
not have run off on our property. Ifthe base ofthe garage is to sit 37" from our fence,
and it appears that the overhang on the garage is 10 to 12 inches, the drainage of the
gutter would be just two feet from our fence. An existing smaller garage, sits 5 feet
south ofthe proposed structure, and the run off from these two garages certainly is not
going to drain uphill to Second Street.
Again, in many ways it seems trivial to have this dispute over two feet, but we deem it
places no more "hardship" on our neighbors to abide by the zoning ordinances than it
does for us to have the variance granted. (One has to question whether the proposed
structure is too large for the lot, in addition to the 6 feet wider, and 8 feet higher, it will
be four feet deeper, which again makes us question potential drainage issues.) Mr. and
Mrs. Kensler are basing their "hardship" argument on the fact that their house will be
situated to close to the new structure, and this coupled with the "existing tree, fence, and
wall" in their back yard, will not provide them adequate room to access the north-parking
stall. We would like to note that on the diagram submitted to the Planning Commission,
it indicates that there is 25 feet between the new structure and the house, which should
allow ample room in their backyard to create additional access to the north-parking stall
of the new garage. The existing chain-link fence could easily be moved to accommodate
a wider driveway in front of the new garage, if desired. The wall and the tree do not
appear to interfere with the proposed structure. Therefore, we do not agree this is a bona
fide hardship. It is simply our neighbors' understandable desire to maintain the integrity
of their own backyard. We have the same goal, to retain the integrity of our backyard.
The suggestion that we only use our backyard seasonally and therefore the variance
should be granted is simply not a valid argument.
.
We respect the rights of our neighbor to build a new garage, we are simply requesting
that the City Council adheres to the zoning ordinances in our neighborhood and enforces
the five feet setback from our property line. We regret that our neighbors did not foresee
to discuss their needs for a variance when planning the garage, as we could have at least
voiced our concerns prior to having their plans fmalized. We did contact David and
Jeanne immediately when we received the notification of the request for variance dated
April 30, 2003, to express our concerns to them. They apparently never intended to
discuss the matter with us.
We thank the City Council for your time and consideration in this matter.
.
Sincerely,
L);tILi:'d~~
... John & Coni Leonard
(.../
.
.
.
.
. ,
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council '" /
Steve Russell, Community Development Directorf v
May 28,2003
Final PUD Approval for 14 Townhouse Development Located on
Parkwood Lane South of Wildpines. Case No. PUD-F/03-48
The final PUD request was considered by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
May 12, 2003. This is the residential part of a mixed use bank/townhouse project.
The bank portion has yet to receive final PUD approval. The HPC and Planning
Commission approved the request with the 16 conditions attached.
Recommendation: Approval.
.
Attachments: Application, staff report and minutes.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
4. ,.
Residential District. Judy Ferrell, representing Jeanne Anderson applicant.
Ms. Ferrell requested a variance to the fence height regulations. The property
has an existing 45" white picket fence. The rest of the fence is tapered on either
side and eventually realigns with the existing 45" fence. The main reason for the
variance is for aesthetic purposes.
Motion made by Commissioner Peroceschi, seconded by Commissioner Turnquist to
approve the variance to the front yard fence height regulations (42" allowed, 45" to 6'
proposed) at 1109 4th Street South with the following conditions:
1. All revisions to the approved project shall be reviewed by the Community
Development Director.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. PUD/03-48. Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase
II, for 14 townhomes (three buildings) located on Parkwood Lane in TH,
Townhouse Residential District. St. Croix Development, applicant.
Mark Gossman gave a brief overview of the final PUD. He shared color samples
with the Commission.
A member of the audience stated that he was pleased with the design and he
would like some reassurance about street improvements by the developer.
Another member of the audience did not know that the project was sold. She
would like to meet with the new developer.
Greg Wind, 6322 Stillwater, brought up his issue with his driveway. It had not
been resolved by the former developer. Mr. Gossman showed Mr. Wind a map
that showed that the pond had been moved and his driveway is no longer in .. .
jeopardy. Mr. Wind was satisfied with the solution. .
Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Teske to approve the
Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase II. for 14 town homes (three
buildings) located on Parkwood Lane with the following conditions:
f
.
.
1. HPC 12 conditions of approval.
2. The details of the fence design and landscaping visually separating the bank use
from the residential development shall be approved by the Community Development .
Director.
10
"
.
. 7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 12, 2003
3. Norway Pine is not acceptable screening between bank lot and residences.
4. Grass areas shall be sodded.. , .
HPC Conditions of Approval:
1. All utilities shall be completely screened from public view.
2. All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection.
No project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning
Commission.
3. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from
landscape areas.
4. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous
from the public street.
5. All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by , ,
fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during
construction activity.
6. Black Hills Spruce or comparable plant material shall replace Colorado Blue '
Spruce trees in Landscape Plan and six various species of boulevard trees to be
reviewed by city staff.
No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public.
All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the
adjacent surface.
Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance. Construction
during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems.
Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building
permits are issued.
All security lights on building shall be down lit.
All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community
Development Director.
OTHER ITEMS
Review and approval of Tax Increment District #10
The city is currently amending its Tax Increment District to help with the
redevelopment of the downtown area.
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approval
the TIF District as consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown
Plan. Motion passed unanimously.
11
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
May 28,2003
Final PUD Approval for 14 Townhouse Development Located on
Parkwood Lane South of Wildpines. Case No. PUD-F/03-48
The final PUD request was considered by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
May 12, 2003. This is the residential part of a mixed use bank/townhouse project.
The bank portion has yet to receive final PUD approval. The HPC and Planning
Commission approved the request with the 16 conditions attached.
Recommendation: Approval.
Attachments: Application, staff report and minutes.
}.
.
.
.
.
.
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from St. Croix Development for a
Final Planned Unit Development, Long Lake Estates Phase II, for 14 townhomes (three
buildings) located on Parkwood Lane in TH, Townhouse Residential District. Case No.
PUDj03-48.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Publish: May 23, 2003
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
~
Memo
.
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
May 9, 2003
Final PUD Approval of Residential Portion
The concept PUD was approved by the Planning Commission on July 8, 2002 and City
Council August 20, 2002. The condition of approval required final Heritage
Preservation Commission and Planning Commission review of the specific project
development plans to make sure they are consistent with the concept plans (see
attached HPC and CPC conditions of approval).
Attached for Planning Commission review are building elevations and a landscape plan.
Building access is provided by an interior courtyard.
The HPC reviewed the project design and approved the proposal with 12 conditions. .
Recommendation:
1. HPC 12 conditions of approval.
2. The details of the fence design and landscaping visually separating the bank use
from the residential development shall be approved by the Community Development
Director.
3. Norway Pine is not acceptable screening between bank lot and residences.
4. Grass areas shall be sodded.
Attachments: Application, elevation and landscape plan.
CPC Action on 5/12/03: +8-0 approval
.
.
.
.
HERIT AGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
A~ tLICATION'DESIGN REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. DR/03-29
Heritage Preservation Date: May 5, 2003
Project Location:Parkwood Lane
Comprehensive Plan District: Townhouse Residential District
Zoning District: TH
Applicant's Name: Mark Grossman representing St. Croix Develvpment
Type of Application: Design Review
Project Description: Final Design review of planned unit development for a 2 acre Planned
Unit Housing Development, Long Lakes Estates. (Parkwood Villa)
Background
One of the conditions of a}-'pnIVal placed on this Planned Unit Develvpment is that the Heritage
Preservation Commission review and approves the design of the project. HPC gave conceptual
July 1,2002, with conditions of approval.
Discussion
The applicant is requesting final design approve of the Long Lakes Estates development. The
development will consist of 14 multi-family residential units on 2 acres; and one commercial
bank with a drive thru on the remaining 1.67 acres (Final review at a later date). The units will
have asphalt roof shingles, Hardie Shake Siding and a texture stone base; colors are yet to be
determined. There will be no site lighting or signage
The landscape is included in the package. It is staff's recommendation that the 8 Colorado Blue
Spruce be replaced with Black Hill Spruce or a comparable plant material. The Landscape Plan
also shows a pedestrian trail that will connect with the
CR 5 trail.
Recommendation: ApplVval as conditioned.
Conditions of Approval:
1. .All utilities shall be completely screened from public view.
2. All landscaping shall be installed before utility release or final project inspection. No
project shall be phased unless approval is granted by the Planning Commission.
3. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas from landscape
areas.
4. The street address of the building shall be displayed in a location conspicuous from the
public street.
.
5. All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected by .
fencing or other necessary measures'shall be taken to prevent damage during construction
activity.
6. Black Hills Spruce or comparable plant material shall replace Colorado Blue Spruce trees
in Landscape Plan.
7. No roofequipment shall he visible to the general public.
8. All gutters, downspouts, fIashings, etc. shall bepainted to match the color of the adjacent
surface.
9. Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance. Construction during
the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems.
10. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits are
issued.
11. All security lights on building shall be downlit.
12. All exterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community
Development Director.
Attachments:
Application Form/Site Plan/Elevation Drawings
.
.
., PLANNING ADM:I~TRATION APPLICATION FORM
DeS'tqN ~e\JlE ~
Case No: ~~....
Dale Filed: #p'~3
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.:
.
ACTION REQUESTED
FEES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
Variance $70/200
Resubdivision $100
Subdivision* $100+50110'
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment* $300
~Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
. supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required. '
A site plan Is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay
application process.
.
Address of Project
'~?(j rkwood
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Lal1L
Zoning District
Description of Project
14
. Assessor's Parcel No.
(GEO Code)
n i!\ F - I p,u P -' +(JJ L)Yl ", OVlJl P .\
.
", hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further cert. I will comply \
the permit if it is granted and used. "
Property Owner 'S + . e (0 \ k.. '"De ue to ,J YV/elt-{- Representative '? ~ ~ ~
I .~. \
Mailing Address /3l/8/ /I), (~O~ 5+ ~'L.~~ \ ,
City-State-Zip ()/J/{ flt,k i/;ldr mN SjtJBZ 'City,St te-~p~~~ 'l. ~ ~~->
. ~. ~\..<:>; .,/"
Telephone No. &5/-C}IS--Oh9o o. MQ~~~
Signatu~ ~;;;"P.hA- Signature ..\~~0':.\~vY~ (\~~,
(Signat~;;red) (Signature i\ V~ire~
/)1,rJeK Go~sm~U1 ~'\~"
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
, Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces
Feet
Lot Size (dimensions) _ x
Land Area
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12. 2002
-
.
.
,~
" '&"
... I 8 I
... ... ~
.-'
,. !l
... . 0..
.
.11' ....".
. .""'-. .......
...
...
.
... L ..,..,....,OOClOS7...-:/'
LAN!:: ~..."
:/,f ::l ...
-
~~-;-oUT..m--~ f-~~:r'...c~-
- I
0~J
1m <' ,.- ~
.......-
-"
))) :
/
\
\.~
\
I
.
.
.
----I
.
IUIW R20W Rl9W
: ~:
:tt
nmW nm
R22W R21W IUOW
Vicinity Map
.
o
244
Scale in Feet
Thiaclrawlngllltlel'R\llrl.......1tIorI .
"'~clr.nd-*_'"
~ InvwklullW""", Ca&dy aIrII;w.
n.......ItlouId.. __rw___
~onty.W_.hinglanCOUnlyIlIlllt
.........far..,.~
SouR:II:W~Co&dJ~OfIk::a
PI.-(IIt)QO.681I
PwcItdatlo......ClftAS<<lD~
amwd tIllaugh: F.brwry" 2C03
""pinIIId: AptI28,2OlD
."
J
,~
.~
.
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
July 8, 2002
Case No. PUD/02-50 A planned unit development for a 3.67 acre mixed use
residential/office development concept located on Stillwater Blvd between Curve
Crest and Wildpines and east of Parkwood Lane. Tim Nolde and Roger Tomten,
applicant.
Mr. Nolde and Mr. Tomten were back in front of the Planning Commission
because of concerns the residents and the Commission had. Mr. Tomten went
over information to address the concerns about trails, traffic and circulation,
compatibility of design, utility improvements and cost to the adjacent property
owners.
.
.5.
.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed letter from Assistant City
Engineer Sanders addressing issues that were brought forth at the April 8, 2002
meeting.
Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Teske to
keep #8 as a condition of approval. Motion passed unanimously.
Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Wald to approve
Planning unit Development for 3.67 acres of mixed commercial/residential development
located west of CR between Curve Crest Boulevard and Wildpilies Lane with the
following conditions:
1.
The park dedication requirement for the townhouse subdivision shall be provided
with subdivision approval.
A CR 5 access permit shall be obtained from Washington County for the
proposed driveways.
Fencing or shrubs, berming, retaining wall shall be constructed along the
perimeter of the drive through driveway to screen headlights from adjacent
residential areas.
The final design for the bank building shall be reviewed based on the
architectural and site design guidelines. .
The City Engineer shall review the drainage plan to ensure ponding requirements
are met.
Drainage, utility and trail easements shall be provided with the subdivision on
final PUD approval.
The detailed townhouse plans shall be reviewed by the fire department for
access requirements regarding road width.
A monument type sign made of materials consistent with the bank building shall
be allowed rather than the 20' pylon sign. A building sign indicating the name of
the bank over the main entry may also be allowed.
Heritage Preservation Commission conditions of approval are added as
conditions of this approval.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
5
loll II 1111111 11,11111
. ~-.
....
~
/'"
City of Stillwater
Planning Commission
July 8, 2002
.
10. No vehicle connection between Parkwood Lane and CR 5.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. CPAl02-02 A Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use
designation of Outlot B, Long Lake Estates, located on Stillwater Blvd from
Attached Single Family to Business Park Commercia] (BP-C). Mike O'Brien, Real
Estate Masters, representing Jennings State Bank, applicant.
Community Development Director Russell gave an overview of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Art Junker of 1164 Parkwood Lane, requested clarification on hours of operation '
and the land use.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve
Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing land use designation of Outlot B, Long Lake
estates. Located on Stillwater Boulevard from Attached Single Family to Business Park
Commercial. Motion passed unanimously. . .
Case No. ZAM/02-02 A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Outlot B, Long Lake
Estates, from Town House (TH) to Business Park Commercial (BP-C). Mike
O'Brien, Real Estate Masters, representing Jennings State Bank, applicant.
Community Development Director Russell gave an overview of the Zoning Map
Amendment.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Bealka to
approve Zoning Map Amendment to rezone Outlot B, Long Lake Estates, from
Townhouse to Business Park Commercial. Motion passed unanimously.
. Consideration of South of Boutwell Area Plan (continued. from 6/17/02 public
hearing). .
Additional traffic information was presented to the Commission in order to make
a decision about South of Boutwell Area Plan.
Sherri Buss reviewed traffic information that was gathered by Engineer Sheldon
Johnson. Sheldqn Johnson believes that the Neal Extension will disperse the
traffic amount evenly.
.
6
1111,~I,llllllIlllIillllldlllllll.III,II;,;ill,il,11111111 111111111111__
~
~
~
...;
.
,- . LoNG LAKE ESTATES, PHASE TWO
· ARCH ITEaU RAl AND SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
21 June 2002
Goal:
· Create a welf-designed transition from the County Road 5 corridor to the
residential area using a mix of multi-family residential and commercial buildings.
· Integrate a pedestrian pathway that completes a connection along the west
side of County Road 5 afld creates a gateway for the trail into the residential area.
· Create a higher density housing opportunity in close proximity to existing
infrastructure, jobs and services.
.
Lot Coverage:
· 60 percent maximum building and hard surface coverage.
Pedestrian Access:
· The project wiJJ provide pedestrian access via pathways along County Road 5,
and between County Road 5 and Parkwood Lane.
Building Design:
· No franchise or prototypical commercial building design shalf be allowed.
· Commercial structures shalf have a scale and massing compatible with the
adjacent residential area.
· Residential structures on Parkwood Lane shalf address the street with semi-
public spaces (front porches, covered entries, etc.) and walkways from the entry
to the curb.
Materials
· No concrete panels, standard concrete block or metal siding shalf be used as
exterior materials.
· Brick, stone, stucco, painted or stained wood siding is to be used as the main
body of exterior materials. High grade; low maintenance materials may be
used provided they achieve the same exterior appearance as the natural
materials.
· Detailing and materials shalf be consistent on all sides of the structure.
Height
· All buildings shalf not exceed 40 feet in height.
Building Setback:
· 40 feet from County Road 5 for commercial buildings.
· 15 feet from Parkwood Lane for residential buildings.
.
1
.--
-
"
..
.~
Parkin~ .
· Parking areas shall be setback 20 feet from public right-of-ways, J 0 feet from
adjacent property lines, bermed and landscaped.
· Drives for commercial buildings shall be setback 15 feet from public right-of-ways,
bermed and landscaped.
Landscaping:
· Areas around buildings shall be planted with deciduous and coniferous trees that
assist in blocking sight lines of parking facilities, and highlight attractive
architectural features of the structures. The existing planting plan established
along County Road 5 will be integrated into the landscaping of the site.
· Over-story deciduous trees will be used in the boulevard of Parkwood lane to
define the streetscape.
· 40 percent of the land area shall be in permanent maintained landscaping, open
spaces and ponding areas.
Screening:
· Parking areas that can be viewed from adjacent roads or residential areas shall be
screened with a combination of deciduous and coniferous planting and berming.
Signage:
· Commercial signs are to be consistent with the City Sign Ordinance.
· A pylon sign is proposed for the commercial property. The guidelines for the sign .
would be similar to those used for other banking establishments in the area and
those specific to the County Road 5 corridor; maximum 20 feet high, 100 square
feet in area and setback J 5 feet from the property line.
· Monument type directional signs may be used to clarify drive-thru and parking
locations.
· No residential signs will be used.
Utilities:
· All utilities will be underground and HVAC equipment will be screened from
view.
· Roof mounted units will be screened via roof configuration, wall extensions
either vertical or horizontal.
· All trash areas shall be completely enclosed and screened from view bya
structure of a design compatible with adjacent structures and landscaping.
Ughting:
· Site lighting will be shielded down-lighting to eliminate glare between
commercial and residential uses.
· Maximum height of parking lot lighting shall be 20 feet.
· Walkway lighting, building lighting, site amenity and sign lighting shall be
compatible with the aqjacent residential areas.
.
2
Illhl I II II II I I 1111111'
.,
.-
~
.
, /
Parkin~
. Parking areas shall be setback 20 feet from public right-of-ways, 10 feet from
adjacent property lines, bermed 'and landscaped.
. Drives for commercial buildings shall be setback 15 feet from public right-of-ways,
bermed and landscaped.
Landscaping:
. Areas around buildings shall be planted with deciduous and coniferous trees that
assist in blocking sight lines of parking facilities, and highlight attractive
architectural features of the structures. The existing planting plan established
along County Road 5 will be integrated into the landscaping of the site.
· Over-story deciduous trees will be used in the boulevard of Parkwood Lane to
define the streetscape.
. 40 percent of the land area shall be in permanent maintained landscaping, open
spaces and ponding areas.
Screening:
. Parking areas that can be viewed from adjacent roads or residential areas shall be
screened with a combination of deciduous and coniferous planting and berming.
.
Signage:
. Commercial signs are to be consistent with the City Sign Ordinance.
. A pylon sign is proposed for the commercial property. The guidelines for the sign
would be similar to those used for other banking establishments in the area and
those specific to the County Road 5 corridor; maximum 20 feet high, 100 square
feet in area and setback 15 feet from the property line.
. Monument type directional signs may be used to clarify drive-thru and parking
locations.
. No residential signs will be used.
Utilities:
. All utilities will be underground and HV AC equipment will be screened from
view.
. Roof mounted units will be screened via roof configuration, wall extensions
either vertical or horizontal.
. All trash areas shall be completely enclosed and screened from view by a
structure of a design compatible with adjacent structures and landscaping.
Lighting:
. Site lighting will be shielded down-lighting to eliminate glare between
commercial and residential uses.
. Maximum height of parking lot lighting shall be 20 feet.
. Walkway lighting, building lighting, site amenity and sign lighting shall be
compatible with the adjacent residential areas.
.
2
Raymond O. Marshall
lohn Scott McDonald
Tracey Ann Galowitz
Barbara Wolle
LAWSON, MARSHALL, McDONALD & GALOWITZ, P.A. l:?/
LA WYERS ~
3880 Laverne Avenue North
Lake EImo;Minnesota 55042
Telephon~: (651) 777-6960
Facsimile: (651) 777-8937
't
~ .
rccaty;::
May 2, 2003
Mr. Tim Freeman
FOLZ, FREEMAN, ERICKSON & ASSOC.
5620 Memorial Avenue North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Dear Tim:
I am enclosing a map that Dave Dupay had worked on before he left your office regarding my
clients Gregory and Linda Wind of 6322 Stillwater Boulevard North, Stillwater, Minnesota
55082. I believe I had discussed with you briefIy by phone the need to change the description to
extend the proposed easement/deed area to the Northwest to coincide with an extension of the .
Westerly property line of Greg and Linda Wind. I am going to present the description to Tim
Nolde who has the adjoining property to attempt to get a deed for the described parcel to Winds
on the basis of their adverse possession. Could you please revise the map and the description to
cover the area that I have shown or let me know if there is any problem or question.
Sincerely,
John S. McDonald
JSM:mas
Enclosure
cc: Greg and Linda Wind
.
.
.
--'--'--. a ~/.
--. --. / a
/ 920.6 a J ~~~' 1f\M3UTU
I .3 , / 0 ~B
~~~~ . ~GO
~ ~
\ ~oo: ,
\ --. ' ~ <J
~ ) '" '" "'1 ~ ~ Jti;;i 00
l ~lt ltS ~1'1Q~~ '"
\-t,; i/1, rt f&. n 1? )( --. --. 0
G ~... pY ) '"
~.~"~ \ T ~ -"~;2 5 4~ ", --. \l'
r ~ \ yot 2 ~ . " i'
\..~ / / ~1 00 Po.rcel B . 1
~ ~ 01) -' ~ ..,~ .c.* 921
9 ~ ~ _'n
:( ---.,) , r-XJ'" '
,~ ri U'
/
9
~<1
/"-
I
I
I ..- -... _ UlIlly .
Easement
/
"
SCALE:
Inch = 50 Feet
b
25 50
.
Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates, Inc.
IIIDJ II I LAND SURVEYING . LAND PLANNING
..~. 5620 MEMORIAL AVENUE NORTH. STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
· (651) 439,8833 . Fax (651) 430-9331
DESCRIPTION SKETCH
TO COVER DRIVEWAY ACROSS PART OF LOT 2,
BLOCK 2, LONG LAKE ESTATES SECOND ADDITION
SKETCH FOR:
Gregory and Linda Wind
6322 Stillwater Boulevard North
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR DRIVEWAY
That part of Lot 2, Block 2, LONG LAKE ESTATES SECOND
ADDITION according to the plat on file and of record in the office of
the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota described as '
follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence North 62 degrees
06 minutes 24 seconds West, bearing oriented to said plat, along the
southerly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 167.19 feet; thence North 33 .
degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds East 34.98 feet; thence South 58 degrees
27 minutes 26 seconds East 51.60 feet; thence South 64 degrees 46
minutes 44 seconds East 64.34 feet; thence South 67 degrees 13 minutes
21 seconds East 52.31 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 2; thence
South 33 degrees 36 minutes 23 seconds West along said southeasterly
line 39.41 feet to the point of beginning, containing 5734 square feet,
more or less.
11-IIS SURVEY OR PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
S P ION AND AM A DULY UCENSEO LAND SURVEYOR
UN LA ATE OF MINNESOTA.
.....
DAVID L DUPA'Y
December 12, 2002
MINNESOTA REGIS RATION NO. 17252 DATE:
\
;\ 1\
i
\\
._\::0,
;\11
'i,
'\
.\~\ \
r
\ .
\
\
i-~
S'l'.
CROJX DEVELOP~J:t'IT, LLC
PARR.WOOD .\llLIA
~11tl & LANDSCAPE PlAN
\
\
-.
~/
--,
l#rtl t
,
, IflYN:Y FENCE
.. _ ',.s~
. ,~.;:;_.;'t~~
- ~~~fg~",,:,>
r-.,'" - '''''''-~X[>~I-_
. ............--..,~.,'""y '"
~". 1= - '\ .;!
~. ~ - -', ~
.- - / -- ,,,,,,::-, .,=....\ ~:Ie
~- - -."" --", ,~
~". ~_I / r------.-r..... -!,.- --; II ~:~7 '"
l I ' 'I! -'-'!--! -,/ -Ir''''
I -, /'" \! ~:.,I'o(!\.I.:,"~ -~.,-i-e
1 1\11'.:11 L "'" I : ru'l;." "'L:'h~ ',- '. !...; _ :- ".rCl; ! --\ j.39
\ I ;, ''. ""_ _ _ -.L-' ....:..; ~ 'ID
I. I L___-1."'-,.-_'-:-_. ._ - ,_":,, _..-<:::: _~, ~
\ l :, ./ ......., \ ,'~_~:~~\ #I~ --~.. ~ ~ ,.,- ,--.. :--:.il~", '
\~ -~ /. 0'",.,'.,-":..-' s_)..-- ~' , !' l<,,,,,
. A-_~f - -__ ~ i-.:-,=-_ X::::-~~~~=--;-_~~-= - /~~:h~~ -'-___
(4) IIUaC MUS _
- --.=-
-=- -=-
-- -=::;:..- .__._~-
_._-~. ---- -.----
- ---~...._":':"'-=--~-
--==--=- --:::::-:::~.. .--- ..--.-
'S;!LLWATEP S!..S:. i.'-:~: -:~ :'!
----- -----.----
.
.
Hlt t.\W1
LANn!tt'.AJlF !Itt':IIrN. It
. 10-12' laCK IlLAaC HIU.S _ (PICrA GLAlJCA OOISATA)
a 10-12' HICH NORWAY PINE (PICEA A8lES)
IflVEllROClC
_...---
L:., - "
ARCHNET
-............111
-.-
"-IDDI' ,. ""~' .....
---
uu
.....-
~
a~
~
--
......w:
..........
~--. -
=.tv/'lDl'rtn
~&
"...K
ProIMl .
k__~
NIlICIIlCID ~
Pro)oct No :
03-120
-117.
Jl:'"
~1I7'
~
Ooto :
RtvI.1ofta :
.... Ooto
'~-1I"'~.'" 1
;':';:;'..!lLtlI r::. ..
:I.~""rI
-
-
.....-- .. ---
-......--.,
-_,
l1li. &.IIaClU'I JIUN
-_,
Ll
eaa ....1JdlIIcbnI~...
.
.
.
~
i
/'
~
i
~
I
i
~
i
I
i
i
i
-
.._~-_.
...::::1...
I
I
~uL J___
j;;~-i-~ ....... -.:;,:
'f' =-=- ~
--
~.L
---,
~~"'''''f-
....-
:;.-:.-~ - ~
==....-::;:::::::::: i r'
-.. /. ~.
___ 7..,.......".a.I.""'"'..I.
-....... ~ l....
CD MCNT .....,.",T1ClN
Ie". H'
~
~
i
,
i
~
!
e
!
.,::;.t_.
..:t..._.
--K_.
..N:_.
L
"\.....,....s.r "
r
........--
.........- -F-
~
.-.-....
....- -
==~
-- /'''''
=:._~
<D e.A.CIC .........TIClN
Ie". H'
.~
~~...~
i~~. >~ ~~~.N.-"S1..
e.;.... ~ j~ 'j
'f:...IoM-_, =- _ -= _ '"
~'";;:. _ . . m-:-: . ,~.
---
~
t-- ~~-._~~~ -~~~~- -~
:.--.,-... -. .~=- -- - -------=_::
T:'.. ....,. -.... -----~~~ ,~~ '2'E.~i
w_ .~ .= =....-rII.: .I:D'-----..~= I
'!':E..~ '~ . .~-=_ '= . :..-=__ :..:!:~~~~~; I .
'Vi:~:: ....... ~ - ---- ,-----, ---- ,- u__ 1IIIL..:.....
....-... ~
CD IlClll a.avATlClN
CD IlClll a.avATIClN
Ie". H'
Ie". H'
CkCHNET
............. Kl
-.-
......... ,', ..., -.aIIII
-.. ...
....
........
~
afr
--
....,..w:
"'~
~_.~,.,_...
Bils .
....joel.
...--~
PlI . .....'III.A
I IN!
IlUNIA
....joel No .
09-120
-Ill"
~
-By.
IL.!!I2ZIr
Dolo.
-..
...
Dolo
11iIII!fr,.....,~"..
~i~t':i. ...
=t."... ttI......
-
-
==-:..~
--,
.....MNI
_1_.
A3
o. .... MtIdINI...........
...:::::.....
e
i
..-
--.
..:1",.
~
i
.,
!
~
i
""'"
-..,
.-U...
~.
'I."
--
.,.&.-~
---
......'NI1....... __
.....'-""'.......
............
CD I'AClNT """"'T1ClN
.... N'
..,.:K'.....
e
i
-""-.
~
!
~
i
I
i
- il ~
! '1.--... '\. ,
=--- ~ ~----. I ~ I
;;'~~~:~-w.. ;miffi'I!I~EfI~W~~ilJ"'m~~~~" -'" f'"_-::-
--~i:~",""-",..~\~,~.:;.:::;'---~~~-= ~~, = __~==~..."...~=- =: ~~~ ~:"~lNL--+-
=;..- ---
e
!
..\(&....,
~'MI
11.':&"'1
<D ltAC:IC """"'T1ClN
...~
...L. ~
~~1~&~~-=-
I ~"~-'=-~=_______'_h~j
~.a-~-'" ~~~li~tM m~ ~~-=-Il~~ :-
1:5-"':.. f;~=,';,~~:~: -- - ~':":--',~ ~~r.fJ:
-.....
---
D
~~'"""
..-"""
~~~'~-~~
.~-: _._.__ ._ ;::.: . "r~
-1-- -:,,-;;L -.
r-;'~"- ;;.;; -- ~1Pf9I== :
___IUIIC ----- -, ~CDI~ ~ ,
... ==- =: =- = ,~. .
~::.-- ~ ~. "" "'--=="- -i
--
---
CD 6/CII """"'T1ClN
.......,,:
o 6ICII """"'TIClN
... . Nil'
.
.
ARCHNET
,. , .." .., ......R
.,..,...,'a-..
"" '." '.. ... ,., .......
---
UU
&II....
~~
a~
~
-
......,w:
...........
l
~~~......
J::/IIlIlltVIl ,
I '
,,",)ocl.
It __CII\tLCIIItW
"I . ". w.&A
I...,
1lILIlNI.
""')ocl No,
03-120
j.
Dnlwn By :
'I""I""MI
'_By,
IlJI2"I"OD
Dolo:
-,
--
Dolo
'. :<~'. .:.~
~.....~
....
..- .......
-
-
==~~
--,
.....1ICINt
--,
A3
.
.
, I
~ . ~ ~
~:~~' I ~- i -~ : -~_. I
. ;;c,. ~...lu.)'-~N' 'I"-...k.-~}--:~ I
:::.:- , m- ~;;=1l~.- :~ -' ~m-----~~r;-m'~--~ :-.-:- ~~ -~ -;<<"_~-u_....,' ;~=:-..=- ..
:..--- -- :. ~ Ii ~ ~ u ~ : I . . - ~
-- ~ Of" -- -- -- _ _ __ . _ _ , _ _ ,
..,....------ ~ A ~-~-=:-. J! 111:t" -r -. ~ . . 1I!MIl.u....~
-.... -5' ........-.-. 1_ "............. L~..... '" -. .. ..- ~ _....._" ..._~ +-
--- I w, I w. _ j w, I .. I .... I .... l
..,..,.,......~
............IINI....
-.........
---
~tuO.
---
<D MC:lN!' -..w.T1CN
...."""
...::'.t~.
~
i
.-.M~.
e
!
...:L.w.
-c.
...~.,.,
'\.___'1.
J
.... NI'
~
.r::: ---__._,
'~-=.- - ---""~
~ ,--'===,---.. .=.
. -- '"-
~-- ~=-:,_____~1 1=~C
" -....-.1 _,...
....-,";;.'- ------m' -m= :=: h.", :
r:.';" . .!.==:::.~. : ~ ~~~::3 i
--.. UK .=.-:-==-..==:....___.~ L._.._ ~~ ~~ ::t"'?;: :
-+::=...-----,-- ---::;:~,.==:,"--.," ==:=.==,m
......'- . . - .,.
---
~.~ .
._~
l -~:- .~.~ I
:-~ .~~ -=---:~ -~~
t.IiOi.. - [1- -m m;: .1
r.-=-"'~ "" ~ ~ ~ = :
-=---'. -=- =.= ~_:
tt:.........1lIJaI. "'l. - = ,___,~__
~:_~.,---- .
CD 1/CII.....,...T1ClN
<D IlCIr .....,...TIClN
Ie'. NI'
.... Hi
.1\R~tir
,...........111
-.-
1IlEIIII"'CDCU:D_
---
...U
.......
,~
a~
~
--
_.W:
.........
~_ '___U,",
--,
.....)eel.
IF. CIIOlICClMIMINr
=r-KIA
Il&CNt 0
.....)eel No .
09-120
..
-11)0.
LfllI!f!'Il
-11)0'
tI.JI3ZIp
Data.
_.
110m
Data
~- "::.r-_..
r=~_
.. ....-
-
-
==~~
--,
1IM1IlINI
--,
A3
0... ....................
i
;
.'
/
0...",.
,..1 .,. :
'1'-0"
~~~;~ '
:'~:lT;:-I.:\:.
I
i'
I ._~._._:..::::::-__h__
".r.POI":'
J(--- -- -- -- _ --- '",,,-, "'''
.~ Cf'-O" ----'------5T:c~Bi~1JNrT
'/ ,~
I
I'
,
-'
____ ~S'-O"
PARK~OD UNir---'
~
...
t
.-1
1,
I
I 'j
T/o J~~~ OORt
-"-,,_/___ __J'I'-5"
-,---, 16'-0" x "-0' OVERHEAD -------,
6ARAGE DOOR ~ITH RAli~~rcD
AND TOP RO~ OF ~INDO~
_~""'_oPiA9<<
.OMt.I. UN\T'I ;,: -..-. 'i
\ J~-~~~ ~~~
~ f"""
~\' '.' 'u~\
, \'t;....
.
.
.
.
4' Gl.),D ,
HARDIE SHAIc:E 51DIII6
Gl.),D - BEAM
II' HORIZ- HARDIE PLANK
LAP 5/DIII6
TAPERED HARDIE PLANK
colJAo!N WIER
GU..1IJIlED STOlE
'~"'..'..."
-.'. .
~.-,-,., ,.:
//, -......--. '.
V
.
o
611'-0'
:ST, '~IX.~p:.,
-r
.;'I'''''~~J.'/'
1':', RAiSED ROoF UFT -.
,.,
.H8...........'
---, .
...- :==:, ~~.:...:~::_. .--.'--
...
.
c)
8
I . .,. ..:';.
. ,
65'-0'
. F'AFlKI"lOOD UN;'
65'00'
F'A~DI.!>lIT
/
.u. I'm
; .t
.,1
If,:
=
rl-J
,[[]
::JDI0~.m m .-:- ,:::", : ,;' 1fT: 1
:Jo~~-m[--:. 13'7.j~
CD eACI<. E1.EvA TION
lie' " 1'-0'
..
(\
,..
".f "., ':~I
'"
.. ,.: .
.::;:
\.
:.:;//~;".;,~.,
;::"V...
~ ~o:;:~. .' ..''.'
elM) _~'_d"_'__,_ ..'--
.e" tiORiz: HARDIE PLANK ~=--:~-'---
. ,'lAP SIDING ---- - -----q,-,-
. TAPERED HARDIE PLANK
W!.UMN GOVER '
....J.\! /0 MAIN 1.EVEL FLOOR
'fEL: 100'-0.
- - -- - -
PRECAST CAP .,--- .--
TECH'T'URE STONE BASE
-; I
'" .J
.1 j
I f / I - ~='.~.:, ',- : ~~-=--=~-' -'- --
, -'..
-... .-- .----. - ---- ---- .-
7' I 1- .::-=-=----..:-'~-,-=- -:., --
I -, ---- --= '.
I ,. ::::. _=:~ ,--
-)
.
.
...b
'~~,--~
.
-"
rrJrraOfJpring-s
Terra Springs blends history, nature and urban living on a remarkable setting near the
scenic St. Croix River in historic downtown Stillwater, Minnesota.
,
Nestled among natural foliage in bluffs carved by nature and surrounded by a wall of
carved limestone, Terra Springs captures a deep and rich history.
. Designed for today's lifestyle, the charming Terra Springs community features
spacious townhomes, lofts' and flats that marry the past with the future. The brick and stone exterior reflects the site's
beginnings while modern amenities and individualized floor plans lay the groundwork for the future in urban living.
Take a walk in the pedestrian-friendly communityCto experience Stillwater at its
finest - from trails, natural springs and reflecting pools that are the foundation of the
site's landscape to leisurely strolls along the St. Croix River, or to many of the shops
and restaurants that abound in downtown Stillwater. Moreover, we recognize the site's
notable past. Its legacy is preserved in an interpretive center and trails that offer a
piece of history while creating a gathering place for new memories.
Terra Springs incorporates all of the elements of classic urban architecture
into the charming and vibrant setting of downtown Stillwater. At Terra
Springs, you choose from a variety of floor plans and price ranges from
$189,000 to $335,000 in several distinct and unique housing styles.
Make Terra Springs and historic downtown Stillwater your choice for new
urban living.
Live the History....
Experience Terra Springs
www.terrasprings.com
z
0
Z
0
-
~ ~~
:E
a::
0 .~ ~
II. t: ~
I Z
II ~~
I 1&1
I a::
I 0
(
I :E
I 1&1
:E
Q
Z
1&1
II)
1&1
II)
Cl:
1&1
.J
a.
.
~
l::
";;:
~
" ~
:~
t'...
.s <>
'" l::
~ "~
... ...
..::: ~
';~
...
~
a.
N
III
~
Ul
III III III
Z Z Z
0 0 0
Ul :r :r :r
Ul a. a.
III a. .J
III II: III !I:: .J
:E C >- :E II: .J >< cl
cl c !: 0 0 III ~ :E
Z cl U :r ~ u bI
At Terra Springs, you will live
amid history and serene, natural
surroundings with modern
conveniences and spacious,
graceful and unique interiors.
l.;
-c.. ~_ ~ cc _._. _ .
.. . ~ ~. _ .c_=..
r'd~#-
~
.~
,e-
.
J. Buxell Architecture, Ltd.
=
;
Terra Springs - A Frauenshuh Sweeney Development
e Developers of Terra Springs' policy of continual improvement in design and contribution requires that specification, equipment, dimensions and prices be subject to change without notice.
.
.
NORTH VIEW
_ '_n~ ?~~-;/l (\c(D?::.r
,'Z'~'Mv;j-V'~ 'V 0v1~-~",-^1\'~,
~,' ~-~
. ,,_. f\, (~\l- -
~.y-,-", .
Terra Springs - A Frauenshuh Sweeney Development
e Developers of Terra Springs' policy of continual improvement in design and contribution requires that specification, equipment, dimensions and prices be subject to change without notice,
Terra Springs - A Fraue*h Sweeney Development
e Developers of Terra Springs' policy of continual improvement in design and contribution es that specification, equipment, dimensions and prices be subject to change without notice,
.
~...
~:~
- - -r'
l!l . .... _~ F~5'\---C-~:/l. (\~
~ '~~VB ' '0 M _ ~{i(Vv..j~
.,~r-V' :0 ~ ~ -
?
,,?
Terra Springs - A Fraue*h Sweeney Development
e Developers of Terra Springs' policyof continual improvement in design and contributio es that specification, equipment, dimensions and prices be subject to change without notice,
.
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
May 28, 2003
Concept PUD Approval for Multi Phased 227 Unit Mixed Use. Terra
Springs Development, Terra Springs LLC, applicant. Case No.
PUD/03-27.
(L/
.
The application before the Council is concept PUD approval for the 227 unit Terra
Springs Project. The site is located in the Central Business District, CBD, and is a
Planned Unit Development allowing flexibility of design.
The 227 units are contained in five (5) buildings. Three of the buildings, 1, 2 and 4,
will be a part of Phase I development starting in August. Buildings 3 and 5 will follow.
All the buildings will require HPC design review and final PUD Council review. The
HPC reviewed the plans at their meeting of April 7 and the Planning Commission
reviewed the plans and recommended concept approval on April 14, 2003. A site plan
and building elevations are attached. The height of the prposed buildings are: No. 1 -
19 HU's - 45 feet, No.2 - 44 HU's - 4 stories, 60 feet, No.3 - 90 HU's proposed 8
stories 95 feet, conditional 6 stories. 60 feet, No.4 - 32 HU's - 3 stories, 45 feet and
No. 5 - proposed 42 HU's, 5 stories conditional 4 ,5tories and 50 feet.
An interpretative center and trail is proposed along with a substantial public green area
that retains the foundation of the old territorial prison manufacturing building. The
existing wayside shall be relocated along the interpretative trail.
Comments from MnDOT were received. Staff and the developer are addressing their
concerns regarding site access.
An EAW was prepared for the project and considered seperately.
.
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approved as consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Plan.
.
Attachments: Application, plans, staff report and minutes from CPC 4/14/03.
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from Terra Springs, LLC, for a
Planned Unit Development for 226 housing units, 15,000 - 20,000 square feet of
retail/office space, 340 under ground parking spaces, landscaped archeological green,
perimeter trail and interpretation area located at 608 North Main Street in the CBD,
Central Business District. Case No. PUD/03-27.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Publish: May 23, 2003
.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STilLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
, u; '"' I' /. ,,~ I
: ;.., r1 e ".. 0 iii- '7 ...
z l-
.. 0 '"
., I' lil 0:
... J ;;:
~ '" .
....li! l ..\ , ...'
;: ."1 e- r.
. I-
EAST STILLWATER
,. Ii .... I r
.... , ~,. .. ...' .""
i i I ...
I~l e"" J
..~ 114 fP';'"
, , ~3 "'
.'.,
..~ ..~ I ."~
I-~ ~
0:
0 .... I ....
5 . -"'" z
, z <t" oJ,.
...-., j
.., ...
I . ., ;.... ~
. ...
~ I " .... i
5 .
I ..
z , .~
t ... I
....
)
EAST I I
. ';"j, i. .~. L_~__I 'r.' I,
1-' 'Ii/! 'I -, (~__ '-'
. ." I'I~~ I~";"
~ ; '.. .',' -: :-;.: . '... ;..
~,- ---', ... ....
.i fill" tu~ ... I
-! g L: ..., ~ ,." ...' t;
! ~ w
-~" .., "',' I!:
J~~ '!~".-- ,----,.
th-~~~
~S~52 ~~
-, . u
w
'"
WILKINS
STREET
...
...' ,./ ~.._' in
';' If ...! I
~...J w 15 I
,. .~' ;.
..r ... :=. ,
I" "''', ^
~~ I
I PEROOC5ll645Q
~'"+-
-- r~~
jJ"
I
...
; . .;....
,
...
(OEOICATED$TRUtPUI'IAT)
.-
'"
0:
o
Z
L
--
...
LA
"
. I Location Map
RnW R2tW 1UOW
Vicinity Map
o
302
Scale in Feet
l'hism.w;ng.UIII......qI.c;ompIlIllcln
"'NP/DdUdiOnollwlcl~_Ih..,
....,invanou.w~COunlyamc.s.
'ThecfnrwingshDuld_UPdf.,.,_
purp;.u.DftIy. W"ngUIIl~.nal
...~far..,,~.
Soun:a:W-"inglOnCoUllly~omc.
PhDhII(6511'*3CHS875
PIilaIl diItII baHcf en A8400 Wom.lllln
CUI'I1InI~~S1.2lOO3
MlJpptinlMtMardt4,2003
PL.-..HNING APPLICATION REVIEW F ~
CASE NO. PUD/03-27
Planning Commission Date: April 14, 2003,. .
Project Location: 608 North Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Downtown Commercial
Zoning District: CBD
Applicants Name: Terra Springs LLC
Type of Application: Concept Planned Unit Development
Project Description: Concept Planned Unit Development review of Terra Springs project on 7.93 acre
site including 227 housing units in five buildings, 4,000 square feet of office use, 9,000 square feet of
retail and 2.64 acres public courtyard, open space, landscaping and interpretive trail.
Discussion: As previously presented, the City of Stillwater has selected a developer and is working with
that developer on plans for the infill/redevelopment of the old territorial prison site at 608 North Main
Street. The redevelopment site is the land inside wall that defines the perimeter of the site. Lands above
the wall will be retained by the city as part of its open space system.
As shown in the attached development plans the proposal is for five buildings, buildings 1-5 as described
~~: .
Building Date
Building 1
Two stories of residential over one level of half paring/half commercial
19 two story townhouses @1,500 sq. ft. average
ApprOXimately 38 underground parking stalls (2/home)
7,000 sq. ft. commercial/historical interpretive
Proposed approximate building height (floor one to roofline) 45 feet
Building 2
Four stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking
44 condominiums @1,320 gross sq. ft. average
mix of one and two story homes
approx. 62 underground parking stalls (l.4/home)
proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 60 feet
Building 3
eight stories of residential over one partially underground level of parking
90 condominiums @ 1,2S0 gross sq. ft. average approx,
Approx. 153 underground parking stalls (1.7/home)
Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 95 feet
Building 4
Three stores of residential over one partially underground level of parking
32 rental apartments @ 1,350 gross sq. ft. average
Approximately 58 underground parking stalls (1.8/home)
Proposed approximate building height (grade to roofline) 45 feet
.
Building 5
Four stories of residential over one level of parking and retail
42 rental alJdrtments or for-sale condominiums @.. _00 sq. ft. average
Approximately 67 underground parking stalls (lo6/home)
6,000 sq. ft. commercial
eotals
227 homes
13,000 sq. ft. commercial .
376 enclosed dedicated parking stalls
145 on-site guest parking spaces
Two hundred and twenty seven housing units are proposed in the five buildings. In addition, commercial
space of 13,000 square feet, 4,000 office and 9,000 retail is proposed.
Parking requirements for the residential use is two spaces per unit or 454 spaces. Commercial space
requirements is 58 spaces. Totaling 512 spaces. The plans show a total of 487 spaces, 342 covered and
145 surface. Public access to the green and trial system will also require parking as well as pedestrian
access.
The proposed height of the buildings is not clear. The application indicates a maximum height of six
stories and 65 feet. The height limit for the CSD district is 50 feet.
The PUD would be developed in phases starting with 2003 and completing in 2005.
The development plans include drainage and circulation have been reviewed by the city engineer, traffic
consultant and fire chief. The circulation plan will be modified to address fire concerns for building
access.
&e concept design plans were reviewed by the HPC at their meeting of April 7, 2003. They approved the
~~i1ding concepts proposed. The detailed building design will require design approval before a design
permit is issued.
Likewise, final PUD approval will require special building use description, composition of residential units
and assigned parking. The parking ordinance allows for modifications to the parking standards based on
a specific site and use analysis.
The height of the proposed building(s) may require a height variance. This will be reviewed when specific
building design plans are proposed for building permits.
As a part of the proposal, an interpretive trail/faCility plan is proposed. The specifics of this plan/facility
should be coordinated with the parks board/heritage preservation commission and Washington County
Historical Commission.
Environmental Review. A environmental review assessment worksheet, EAW, is required because the
,site is on the National Register of Historical Places. The EAW is attached and will be notified for review
and comment.
Recommendation: Approval to Council
Attachments: Application and plans
t.c Action on 4/14/03: +5-1 approval
" .
Case No: ~'1J ~1
Date Filed: '
Fee Paid: ~r:;r:)C)
Receipt No.: ~
ACTION REQUESTED FEES
- Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
- Variance $70/200
_ Resubdivision $100
- Subdivision* $100+501l0t
- Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_ Zoning Amendment* $300
X Planning Unit Development* $500
= Certificate of Compliance $ 70
/
PLANNING ADMINIS.. .,'" TION APPLlCA liON FORM:,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
* An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted In connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan Is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project: 700 No Main (Territorial Prison site) Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District
Description of Project
(GEO Code)
.
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with
the permit if it is granted and used. "
** Presently the property is owned by the city. Mter the sale, property will be owned by Terra Springs LLC **
Property Owner: TERRA SPRINGS LLC
Representative:_ BRIAN 5WEENF-Y
Mailing Address' (same)
City - State - Zip (same)
Mailing Address: 180 East 5th 5t - Ste 160
City - State - Zip: 81. Paul. MN 55101
Telephone No. 651-291-:2591
Signature )a ~ 1.
' -(~g-;'~red)
Telephone No. 6~1-29J3591
Signature fi,;,(l.. . '
( (S~reqUired)
Lot Size (dimensions):
Land Area: aoorox, 6 Acres
Height of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal 2-6 stories 20-58 feet
Accessory J total of 5 building!;)
x
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area
Existing 8.000
Proposed 250,000
Paved Impervious Area
No. of off-street parking spaces:
square feet
. square feet
square feet
square fee
-342
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM
April 12.2002
.
4/IJ IV ..,(.< : l~L ,
. I
" ;!;, i
~1tJ ~!! 1,-+
I I I I!
, : I ,:. .
. I I, I
! II I. I
; ! ~ I ~ :
, ;, ! I
"I~'I :,
'r,': ;:-j'
. I I "
, ,J: .j.
, !,: I
, ' ','; ; I
/ , '
; II '
!! ! I
, , I .1
, I'll I
: S'"t> .~PM' # q>F M~~S:~i ~ ~
, t i I iI I
, "I I', i
, ': 1 I ;',
, ! I 1
.. . i 'J .1 i,
/, I '!
, "j :.
: I
1 I
I 11~A~SMI
I
I
.
TiV\NSMlssrON D^TE:~ / Lf I eJ3...TlME: 11
I
I
PlEI\SE 0 ~IVEp.. THE FOLLOWlNC MESS^CE TO:
I
I
I
I
S1"'E'W 12tll,SS ct"C.
., .. .. , i ~ 'I
J 10 "
~ I . I I ,I
CtiLt_ oF- j S"rl,",~W""~ ' : ! : !,~!
I ~ I! 'I
t,~ I . L.f ~(') .. 88..' () j i ;. i J
} I I i I':; !
P~OJEcr:, T(LfiA-~f'~' II} ~\PR.OJECT ~UMBE~:~ II ~l~ ~
n-iESE ^~.E TMNSMrrnO ^' NOTEd: Cl ~ MOlEmO Cl A~~OVEt'li~, ~ ~)!
Q COIt.~ ~ I toLJ COPIES CI FO~ ~E~IEW AND COMMENT BY! ,I I ,; 21 J .:.
C FO~ ^ P~OV,-\L Q ^PPP..OVl~ M SUBMITi'EO CJ Fd~ YOU~I' usk-I :;
~ PlE:\SE ~E5UBMIT 0 fOR. BID~ DUE I ' -.i21 i~ .:.
i I I' I I"
I:! I: : ,i '" 'I
" 0' 1 ~ ': . I
, -.1 I I I I :' i; 'I. :1'11:1
t\ ;:"~\..lME:-.iTS COMMESTS L\.EM~~~: i', ,I : 0 " I:
I 'PVD ~4-^ ::' !'!! i:: I :~I
I II I, : I: I"
I : :: I
I i: : I ! I:' I:
" ; I ' ,
. I I i:
N ~\AE:
FI:lM:
F,\X NUMBE.~:
: :!
.
a
,: : I r ,I
Joe.. !v\VSCl \ f- I I,I! 'I
" II I II I I
J !:If'x-"r ~,,-,.,----U"-! .-n : ;111:1
. :;;I....., c.~_ ."."""~'. c......: '.,~:, 1-.l..o, , ill: 'I
' I J I
t I. "
" . "'l :. , J. \. - J,'" '/ '"' U ~ ~ -. i'I ,,- ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ' .... - -, . - _ ~ .. '" "11'\:"'''
' - 'I- .-: I' :. "'."-. \....; :. ~ . : ~ ...,:, .,:. v .~ ~ ~ . ..... \,.J . ~ 1 , I . ~.'""'\ I~ ,~,'- . r ~ ,:\..l ,. .
, 0 - A.. . - -... I' ~ ~ '/ 3 . S 't...,. - , , r\ ~ K "!I ~ ' . , 1,' I
. _:.. ~:a \... ,,. .. ~ ~,,- ~. t1 J , ,J. l r-:. . . I. U WI' i 'I : I :
t..t-. . . ~ " ..JR,
~'E '~':~" (,,4,~C~ ':C!\.;,"i~1C ::" nits F^'::~I~1IU :-.ItSS".ca 'S i'll.:VUCii:J .\~'O ':~~:-'''^l.. il'-'7 t~'C I l~!( · ''i.l.
':':-E :.:s! ~ f' ':"'I"E ::-'~lvr~L ~" t......-:":':"Y ="t\."It: \~!, :, 7':~~ M,4,C'e..\ ;f 7':-!1$ ~~S....;:;t :s ~ ~i' ':"h :t~ :t...
~~.:::t!El'oo~, C~ !1-I'l !."O'I.~~ ':-1'. ^C!:-.T USlCl-.sliL! TO CE.lV'S." IT Tv M Il'o.1i:..cw1 J.lc::r~l'oo"T, ~.tJ1 !IE.~ ~I"
:o.OT1tlEO ~, H^ 'r .~~y OISSE."UNA ~O", Olmi';"1cllO ell .::c'~NC ~ 1'HiS ~OMf,.~~1C^inoN :s sni:n.1". A~r:.;.
:F VC\.I !>MV1, ~~-MO 'lltl$ .:e"'lMt.::-'lC""ON ::-: FMCR.. rtL~ IMt..COIA~V sd,rN us iY t'IlDH :t,I" Nil
I , I I I . I
~:-o T ~ ~I:-:N. IIICSS1\CE TO us ^T' ~ ~ 3El.OW \M TloC! U.,s. fOn'i\l.-'VICI. ~: I :! '; !
: II.j I' :
II, I ' :
,l: i'l I
all Hnv l1Hns r" : I ;~irl7.;q:?l
:iC SE:"':
'd
0610'ON
! .
'(
, ,
~ I WIlNtNQ
Cll.....,4,CJ..;:II ~1Io:N1T'U
JW.'l ~
WlI:l5C.VI.~ IlIa\.Iq
,; ':aM4CS
, ~ . .
"
,
!:
'I
"
. ,
I
.'
:'
"
"
I
~ . I ,
i' I
:1
II
,I
II
,I
:1
o.
, ,
,
. ;1
"
,
"
"
'.
, ':
"
"
. '
: l)
!'
1. B LIXEiL~'
.".ACHrr~ ;.lIU; 10m.
:.:<I101\tC4'!> l/NOo'~:
~N~,~,,~,,~
rn07. 'v ox riV5!7 n.
TerraSprings
COn ept PUD Submittal
Ma
The pr posed development area is bount. by the main historic wall and N. ~In Stre It.! i i I ;
This art ~ is 7.93 aaes. ,: I '
Five bu Idings are proposed. , ' 'I! ' :
Site pia I'\S refer to "building 1 - building ~." 'I 'I;
Five bu Idings are labelled and referred tt in a clockwise sequence starting at the SI:, i, ,I!
. I I l, h
, ':' I ~ . I
two storie~' of residential over one level of h; Ilf parkin~ (~~f i I 'm!r.. :ial
19 two-st townhouses @ 1,500 s.f. ave~ge ': " I' l'l ,
approx. 3 underground parking stalls (2/hdme) : ,; I I
7,000 $.f. ~ommercial/historical interpretive ", :! ~ \ " ,
Pl'OSlosed approximate building hei9ht (floor one ,to ro4f1ine. ~ :fe!G
( : r I ~ I r
I ' : "
four stories of residential over one partially, Indel"9rou ~~, ~ '
44 eo"'dO~inium$ @ 1,320 gross s.f. averag ~ : ': : i ,I I I
mix of on~ and two~story homes : I .:: I I I
approx, 6 underground parking stalls (1.4/~ome} : I; i i II
proposed pproximete building height (grad~ to rooflime) 60 ~~
J I Ii 'I:L i I : '
eight stories of residential over one partiaIlY,undergro' ;'n~ I : .. I of parking
90 t:Ondoniinil.lms @ 1,250 gross $.f. average . i ! I';; .
approx. 1S'3 underground parking stall$ (t. ;!/hOme) i:': I ! '
proposed i pproximate building height (grad, to roofli~I'~~ h ~~
1 , Ii I i Ii ;' ,
three stories of residential over one partially! undergro :..nC1lle ,of piorklng
32 rental ~artments @ 1,350 gross s.f. average i I; ': I: '
approx. s~ underground parking stalls (1.8/f' orne) '. I i I '1
proposed ~pproximate building height (grad to ~oflhl' !i~ 1~ ~ ~ i
I ' ,. ]". , .
four stories of reslclentlal over one level of PJrldno an' rettall i '! '
42 rental ~artments or for~sale condominiu !tis) @ 1,: .00 $.:'.: ~el a~e
approx. 67r undel'9round parking stalls (1.6l1ome) II !: J I '
6,000 s.f. rmmerClal ;' i; .1
227 hornet I! ,I : I 'II
13,000 s.f. commercial 'II' '. ,
376 Elnd~d dedicated parking stalls !;:: 'I:
145 on-site guest parking spaces , !' 'I i
i. l: I
1,1 I
, I';
j: I .,
I:!
" i'!
,I ','I
,; ,
;'i i '
,", ,,'
J ',I
" !
'!
buUdirw data
buiklin~ 1
bujJdj~ 2
buildin" 3
bulldlns 4
bUlldi", 5
totals
z
d
0610 'ON
: Ii ~I
, ~ ,
, .,
, 1 i
! I i I
" ~
, : .~
, I
!
::1 I
,t I'
.
, I ~
I'
II If:
if I I I
, I
II I. :
. ,
, "
:i'
, I
j
,
i ' ,
I
I
I
I
t ' '
I
,
,
I
i
i
i,
:!
I'
, '
~; ~ a:ridng
,i
.
all Hnv 1nxoa
i
,
i
I
,
I
,
I
: I
I I
f!l, ! ;
,
I
,
i
i
,I
.1
!
I I d
q ~
I : ~ II : ' i ,
, ;1 '
:! I ' I '
':Wrlr.q:7.1 r.oO?,'v )1.1\1"
.
,
, ,
II i; I I:
',',' 'I I ~
ii
1'1 j
, !I
II! i j i :,
"II I "
, i; ~ :',.
l': i I
,I I I 'i
:: I 11', Ii
, ,I.!
I'
,i, j I .
, '
!I:: J:
:: 1:' I
", '" !,
" I "
I I I I ! : ! II
I 'J11 Ij
i ~ ; 1 : ~.l :~
j I I .
. i! Ii'
'1'1' "
'I: ;' j II j ;!
, . ~ i,
'I' I '. ,:
: : ". :
"'I .' r "
'" I' . I'
,; 1 J ,
I. ~: I' , j ,
.' I I ~
, J'
I I'.
ii" ::j I
I I ,: I !': :' !'
. ,I I .. 1 ,.
all Hnv 1uxna r.: i:, Wdf9 : Z I €002'P 'U'tf!
.
l
I
227 ho es on 7.93 acres.. 29 homes/acre
e)C~d impaet uaon the ~itv !lehOl)J di.8t:rid
Minimal impact. .
In 227 ',omes here, may see about S sc:h )ol-age chndren total.
stratifirtiDn Dr residential use
number of lOmes
sjngle-t mily detached 0
single-f; !mily attached 0
multiple -family 227
.t.Clin~ ..IIlI.D
BUilding 1
constructlo ~ start autumn 2003
oecuponey lutumn 2004
Building 2
constructlo' start autumn 2003
occupancy ate 2004/early 2005
Building 3
I
constructlo 1 start late 2003
occupancy spring/summer 200S
Building 4
constructlo 1 start autumn 2003
occupancy .ummer 2004
.
BuildIng 5
construetlo 1 start autumn 2004
occupancy 'utumn 2005
Gross s lIuaN'! focttaDe I')~mmerdal "OtJ.LiPaee
13,000 ..1'. !
I
reSideral dweUihlll units bv num~erlaf bedrDOms ,
227 unl i
approx. unit mix: 80% 2-be<lroom + 10t,:, 3.bedroom + 10% 1-bedroom or stu~io
equals : approx. 458 bedrooms ;
.
[
d
0610 'ON
. : : I r :
, j i ~ I !1
I I '
I I I' it
, ,
.1 I I, .
'. ,," ,
:1 i I I, ,I
I ~ I! I I'
I: I I II
'., 11
. J
I
I
! i
: I
,;' I!
. "
~ I I
: I
i! i
!!! ~
l! i I
! I.
i ~
J
'I, ,I I
;: ! 1
, ',I
lii:1 '
i I! I'.' ~
'\ I! j'l
;1,: II:: 'I I
:./ ; II '
: I! r d '
: Ii ,I
i I: 1'1 I;
: I: I II
:!! ! ,I
!' i [,I .
:1 ! 1",1 "
I I I J ~ " I
: i I ! ~
I ,
:1' !:
i! I'
!I I' ~
'. , ~!.
I : I ~.
; f! J:I
I; .: J j .
,I, I
i'l
, I
~ I
./ ,
,
,
, ,
,
, i
, .
,
I
\!.
, !
,
, i
.1
, ,
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 14, 2003
.
Chairperson Hultman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Commissioners Gag, Hultman, Turnquist, Ranum, Wald, and
Council representative Junker
Absent:
Commissioners Middleton and Teske
Others:
Community Development Director Russell
Case No. SUP/03-26. A special use permit for a mini storage facility located
in the Business Park Industrial District, BP-I on the southeast corner of
Curve Crest Blvd and Industrial Blvd. Steve Gaffney, applicant. (Continued
from the March 17, 2003 Meeting).
Continued until the next meeting.
Case No. PUD/03-27. Planned Unit Development for 226 housing units,
15,000 - 20,000 square feet of retail/office space, 340 under ground parking .
spaces, landscaped archeological green, perimeter trail and interpretation
area located at 608 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
Terra Springs, LLC, applicant.
Brian Sweeney, Terra Springs, LLC stated that they hope to start soon.
They are waiting on a development agreement with the City.
Jack Buxell, architect for Terra Springs, gave an overview of the planned
unit development. There will be five buildings on the site, however on 3 of
them are ready for approval at this time. Building 1 would be two stories of
residential over one level of half parking and the other half commercial
with 19 two-story townhouses at 1,500 square feet average. Building 2
would be four storied of residential over one partially underground level of
parking with 44 condos at 1,320 gross square feet average. Building 3
would be eight stories of residential over one partially underground level of
parking with 90 condos at 1,250 gross square feet average. Building 4
would be three stories of residential over one partially underground level
of parking with 32 rental apartments at 1,350 gross square feet average.
Building 5 would be four stories of residential over one level of parking and
retail with 42 rental apartments or for-sale condos at 1,200 square feet
average. There would be a total of 227 homes, 13,000 square feet of
.
1
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 14, 2003
commercial space, 376 enclosed dedicated parking stalls and 130 on-site
guest parking space.
The proposed height of the buildings is not clear. The application indicated
a maximum height of six stories and 65 feet. The height of the buildings
may require a height variance. This will be reviewed when specific building
design plans are proposed for building permits.
There would also be an interpretive trail system through the site.
The water runoff on the site will be used for heating and cooling for the
site and then pumped into the river. The water will not cause problems
with the river.
Kenneth Kress, 403 N. Sherburne Street inquired about the cost of the
water system. Would the city pay for it or the developer? Mr. Buxell stated
that it would be part of the development. The system would pay for itself
within six years because of the cost saving to the residents of the site.
.
Christina Michaud, 904 1st Street N - questioned the height of the wall and
the elevation of the buildings. Mr. Buxell stated that he would be willing to
meet with Ms. Michaud to possibly determine the elevation of her home for
better understanding of the height of the structures compared to her
home.
Paulette Lappi, - asked if building 4 and 5 would be
above the wall. The height of the walls was not known at the meeting.
Community Development Director Russell asked Mr. Buxell if the wall
height could be shown on the drawings for subsequent meetings. Mr.
Buxell agreed and will have the height of the walls on future drawings.
Commissioner Ranum inquired about on-street parking. Mr. Buxell stated
that it was proposed to have 145 spaces, however at the request of the
fire chief it has been reduced to 130 spaces for drop off locations.
Commissioner Ranum also asked if the Commission approves the PUD,
does that mean all buildings are approved. Commission member Junker
stated that only buildings 1, 2, and 4 are being approved at this time.
.
Motion made by Commissioner Turnquist, seconded by Commissioner Gag to
approve Case PUD/03-27 located at 608 North Main Street. Motion passed. 5
fore, 1 against.
2
DEVELOPER
T.hRRASPRI~GS
. NORTH MAIN SI1U,I:.1
SmLWATER, MN
ARCHITECTIJRE, PLANNING
& LANDSCAPE ARuu.u:.CfURE
FRAUENSHUH SWEENEY
180 EAsT 5m 5TREET, Sum 160
SAINT PAUL, r<.......""OTA 55101
CONTAcr:
BlUAN Sv.-........
651.,291-3591
SHEET INJ'~
~.O CovEIlSJlEEr
""0.1 ADw.PuII
1.0"'.'5111.0 5TrEPuII
~1.1 LumsCAPE Pull
SC 1.1.1 BI.DG Ifl COMMERCLU. SPACE
. ....._.:....AL CARAGE PLAN
SC 1.1.2. BI.DG "1 MAIM UVEI. PIAN
171.2.1 BLOG #l ELlVATIONS
.
J. BUXELL ARCHITECTURE, LID.
129 NORTH SEcoND 5TREEr, SUlIE 101
MlNNEAPous, \I~...""OTA 55401
CONTAcr:
612-338-3m
/
SC 2.1.1 BLOG 1#2 GARAGE PLAN
SC 2.1.2 BLOG 1#2 MAIN LlVEL PLAN
t..-.5C 2.2.1 BLOG 1#2 ElIVAnONS
lAC 3.2.1 BLDG #3 ElIVAnONS
SC ..1.1 BLOG ". GAIlG.\1lE PLAN
SC 4.1.2 BLDG ". MAIN LlVEL PLAN
\.-8t" ..2.1 BLOG #. ElIVAnONS
.
SC 5.1.1 BLOGI#S mAIL SPACE
. .",-,..", ,.,.u.GAIlAGEPLAN
SC 5.1.2 BLOG 1#5 MAIN LlVEL PIAN
05.2.1 BLOG "5 ElIVAnONS
CIvu. ENGnu:.r..l\ING
BKBM EN..............s
5930 BROOICLYN BOUlEVARD
MlNNEAPous, MN 55429-2518
CONTACI': .
TOM CEsARE
763-843-0464
0.0 ToPOGlW'lllc 5U1lVEY
Cl.l 1lEMo1moNPw<
0.2 GlwnNG Il1WIlAGE AIlIl _If COIlTROt
C1.3 1ImnY PwI
0.4 5ToIlM SEWEll Pw< 10 501 BuluJIIfG 5TrE
o.s DR.uIl TItE Pw<
C1.6 OVD.IIEWJ.
Cl.7 OVD.IIEWJ.
J.BUXELL
MCHmCTU~E. L1'O
Ilt....1MIICClNDm&rr..11H
M1NtCN01A MlN~ADI01
"lUl>>J7'S fAX"'.tD>>aMo
~
I HIMIY cu.1lFY THAT TN!.
PlAN, ,"ClfICATION. O~
UJIOkT WAS I'Q1AND.., he
0Jl. UNDU. MY Dll,rCT
5Uftll.VISIClN AND ~T J.Ml
^ DULY luc.nUIC
AaOCmCT UNtIUl. DC LAWS
a- TJoE fl'AlI Of MMCIOTA.
........
i
~f
~i
~B
i~
I
--
FRAuu'.)nun
S\\r.uu~'
NOT FOR
Cu..'""UCTlON
......
COVER SHEET
CA.". Vl.D.DD
raotCCT,. OlO'16.Ot
OUlClNI IJIJl.
Df.AWN ......
roo:o
.
.
J.BUXELL
AllCHmcrull.E.lTD
'''NOll.1HSICClNOftl.ut.''Ot
MlNNIAIOUl. ......NIIO'fA...1
i6UD>>J173 'AXC61~
...... ...........,
""""""'-
AAOomCnlU
~#I~",,->..I
QNMICS
...
~
.7)
I MD.DY cu.WV 1H.I\.y 1MI
I'LAN. mC"ICATIOS. OJ.
IW'OU WM nDMIO IV ..
0.. UNOl" MY OJJ.ICl
suu.VI5lON AH:J THAT J AM
" DULY 1.1C.fTla.ID
~ UN:ID. 11C lAWS
01 TI<< "Ana MNNUOTA.
w:......
e~
~g
I
'f I;
a
t
~ ......
1 FRAUENSHUH
S\\~..a'
l
1 NOT FOR
CV"~'AUcnON
.......
AERw. Sm
i VIEw
:; ...'" lJL2UJlJ3
a PICltICf., ........
DI$OCN IJIlL
DMWN, u.s.
... lNUT . I 00.1
.n ..
.;. ~ ~
1 .
~
~
...
!
d.
u~..
'I
I
y
=-.
..::;-.....~.--..:.."'"-""'""<:='......,~.,"..~
..
I
\\~~
(
"")-..
Iii
Ie
----
.
.
J.BUXELL
MCHlTICIURE. LTO
1" NOLtN 1ICONDsn.m. _'Ot
MlMNLVOUI, MlNNDl:IfAJN01
1611D>>>>n 'AXl6laJUa.O:No
~)
I HElUY cu.my lHI\T 1M5
rtAl'f. mCIIICATION. Oil.
Il.If'C>>.T WAS IPDNoO IV JrooII:_
all. UNIOn. MY DllllCt
:lUD.VlSION NO m..r f AM
^ DULY ....CIITU.I,D
AAOCJlCT UJClO,. M tAM
Of TIC STAll or MlNSISO!'A.
""-""
~
-- ,
i I I I
,III _
..'" 10 to
ICA&l:r.JO'''''
e:Ji
:H
l:l..j
~
II
FRAv:o:.'~l'lvn
SWEENEY
NOT FOR .
C'u....."UcnON
--
Sm I'LAN
""'" ..........
raQICr_ OlO26.D6
0UlCN. JJU.
PI.AWN; J.J.S.
""". I ASDl.,!
.
.
I
J \
t
.~
:j
.l
J
'J
Ii
g .
.~
:~
'I
~
-d
:J
.
PRELIMINARY PLANT U&T
- -
Gr-
o w_ -
o
_.
--
...
=-
~
.........
-.
-
.....
-
.....
J l
u~
-
-
--
--
I
@ ..,.... ,..
~
--
-..
...
...............' "'''' .-1 ,.,._.,.~
r ~.r-. .~~--,.--:"" -"" li .~.1~ ~----._ .
/~:):.(+'i+-+~ +t+K:t.:~-;::'\-! . ~~~
V
.~ .~:'J' ~~ -~ ""'~~~ff--lt ~~ ~~~e~ I f.
I I~, IJJ~ . -:-1. /A' Jl: ' . :'Jr + r
l' '~. Z ' .~~ /'- Y( .J\ l^-J:j,. IJ '. +. (
" 'J ' J, ~ ,\ -....;, #
f :/ ,'// II ~ ~J ~"Ii~. ~'r--.~1.~' '~:(0rJ!J ~ # ~. 1'1
\ 'J f- ')11' ~ ~ ~~J~"s- J4 1i.(L I
~".:....~/ ,~ ~:---:.~~.. .........;: '~b ~
+ ~ --, ~ . ~ .
. . '... ~.~~' ~"(o:t' ~./1"" (J
~ :.c. ~~~~ -'~J~ .:~"= c 0.; __'
\\ '~~~i])j/~~-2~':. ~
L \\ ~'\+j'+ ~~~.1t!/1;LL $~~.~~:r::J
\\\ _~I '-"\..'/'" ~ ~'/l... - ;,
.. .. ~ -=- .C> 7~~~.lI.~ ~. 7 1lfI '{ ":
, I' l~. ~ :/ VIL
~.~~_..~
~ r;; J: I r
v
I
I
Ii.
'I
,Ii
J I
I '
I
\
,\"""",,,,\
. J.BUXELL
~~~.M&~~
MINNIAfOUS.IoIIHNaO'l'A SMOI
161"""" rAXlf.'1D>>OOeO
. ""
....."'"
'^""""'"
~
I HEllIY cu.uy lliAT Ttft'..:;;;
"-AN, snCJfJCATION. O~_
~T W^' INPMm Iy ME
Oil USDU. MY Dlkr.Cl
suru.VISIONAK)1HA.TI~
^ DULY a.1CI5TU.ID
.~ UN:lfJ\.,.. v..W$
Of nc JTAlI 01 MINNUOJ'A.
""',I<<'
~
r~~
o IS SO eo to
lUll: r dO'""
~!
:H
~~
~I
~!
~I
......
FRAUENSHUH
SWEENEY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUcnON
..-
lANDSCAPE
PuN
"^'"
""""'.
0'.''''
OMWI<
VUUIllD
0""""
lJUL
RJ.s.
..... J ASDl.l
'" L', f~'jL
~ rL
_,'.1""
---
N 0 P-T ~
==- L- = V""'-T I <:::> r--J
1~.1.:::r~"
.~
E-^o T / '--1AII--.: -:=::>T l!- !::.. ~ T
~';'
,
", .",).,
'1\ \
~'-:., ~'-". ~' '. " ,;,'----
'~!?'
i",V-.':
. . ,I ..
' .1 '
~'i"t ... ~~~a
- ~. '. ". o. . . .. . '. __.
=a.... : ";'T""ii-~ ..' .":'.'~ . ......,rtl..."..... ~ ~',. _, :.. _
~
:::.- _~VA..IIC)N
l'.ja;o'
.
.
I, BUXELL
fu!.:~~~~
.'''....11......13_,....-
-~
~""'l..:cw...~.
Ak'Wfto..~~
.A-no:Nt.-.:~'f.i
-~.
~I
c;s
~~
~~
~ti
=E
~~
~~
z:
e:>L.PGi> to I
~"^",D1-J5
=~
ill
.
.
''>\
--:;..'
~ .-~\
c.~
. "f.'
;-
-r,.e.T
.
/"\
~
, ,",
, } '\,
\ I!,
.~ \' r _..... c..
, ~:\S"
:::-A~,,\,. .
.'l_'a-"", ,.,1.
...,.,'I..,.....r ;'A
I, ..,f~
~
:-V^-IO
fa ;o'-o~
r
rJ
'.....
.... '.
t-:-..: 0 2--, 1--1
.-=1
~ -
"'VA
I.'I~~&>'
o t-.:
,......... -~y""
j,
,. .
, .
~\
"
- ;:.:.~";'
l(~i
~}:i
I~'
M">
.
~~
:=~~~
~~~~~~!~
-'I
~!
~~
~E
~~
~~
~~
~
LCl:;;..Z.
G.V^T'OfJ
=tr~
="1"" I
.
'V-';>
i'/
~... .........-.......,......,..;......----..
y ~'t.' ',-
"
,
l.-r......~. /
./
.,
/1:,. .'~
,<t,;-~.. ..-r
-;
.. I"/".
l
-:=,
OUT~
::... L- ...
_VA..,
C>},.,J
\1I_ID1..,,"
\
\
\
\
,
,I ....--1 y'! .~-;
~. -- (
r
-")' I,
\.
I
~~t:G ~
'"
I
r.'')I
y'
\..
~
,j~~' 1}1
/
~^e>T
-e... L....
_VAT
ION.
1'.IDt.~"
,....:...---.<.".
.
'-
~~,\;!;
~~-~~
.=-..5t~iT
.......""1n..-n...:
_ GO..<\It<~',
~
'\ I
~I
~i
~~
~I
~~
E-c~
o
z
e>u,l.J:),IJ....+
eL.e.v"'T1O"f/
:=c..
=~
_I
.
. ' --,. -'I .," 'I - '-.-'" ". '-. ....., .... .,. -:...-_: -.-.' ;_' -;-!!'. '_'._'_..1-;.:_::' 'I ,-'.'_'..,.' :II:II'_"~_~_.
'-~'-'.'i"..._I-4'" "~'." ........---- "y~. .1- -- ----....-....-....., -. ..' ..-...-r-.....--. '. .. .... ", t '1'~' ';..' ., .~ ."J ,I
.."_. ..... ..~:-;-:- '--'.-.:-t.-. .._.- ',' " ;
=(!~~<j~.~~~;1;1S~, . . . . . . . . . .. .. +. .. ..
. .-'. - . ,-;-- .-,- ., .'i'-' .11 "Il ' ,(,/,), t-"f.t-,..--,.~I-I'-TI-'ll. ....H.-._.'-_..:m~h_...._t,.
:: ~ .-..< .;.: .:_; ..:~;':::::- :--.-<;:-:~-: -',.'~--;-:~: ~ :j~.~~;:~->- ;;:i~~~i:;.{.;L:_~~;I:;'+~t~~-~'; :.;';!-:r!;-:-~'+j.. .t.~~ei:~t: :.; :~:j; ~~~,.: <~.~I::1:;-:--~;'.:~0.t~~:h2-::.; -l:c;~:i~.
~ - -- .'.-.-.- --......---.--- --1-;........-......'.--.'-'-'''.----......-.'-;-.-.,..' "., ,,'-'-~ .-"1"" ~'"T" . ~"!I- . '- . l" - "....,... .-
- lA)>(. - , ..' .." - ,.,-~ ......, '..- _.-,_..t. ..' - ..X1"~'r' . 1'''''-_._'''.
,-;.~.:~~.i ,,~-\i kji~~:?;~;l~~k:~'i,EJ?~ f~r~ ;~~f;,J~j;[fB[,~~-;-h~'~j~~~[Wf~
. ... ....... ... ......... q...,......i-..-.,..c....... ... .." ,~... .1.... .~..u.. ...~....m.. .,.. ......J.j....
:'. .: -. - ..-... i~'----:;' --'.:'-:-'-:~~-: . _ . >--.:.. =;::r-:-:-'-'n:: ::-:.: ---: ..~ ~~' .1;.~~-l_.~-.=-.':___.~_' _n'-' -.:, '. _~-c..-~:---:-~.,:-=_,:~::-....r_--"~- ~.:jj-i:; t--b)i-r>".LC.I
..... .., -.-G...--.--..- _.-n..__________.._~._ -'. ...,......--, .. -- 'if -, -,..-< . -....1' "...,..;;- .1..tl.t.....i~I~rtJ'r'lr....riT1"";-r,I('
- .. :-:.' _". ': ';' ~ft': -:!::: >.:-:-, .-~:.;.-~-<.:-;::H l:!Sj-j-~'-.-r; . '-::' , - -<:.:~ ~!::-::-!'!-; i:n!J:M-:~~-(-r;.( -::; ;:-:;.::1< H4f~-1'~ ~t.. ~:~1::~.:~.~-~.~_1~~:
. . + f - .- ., -. -"'. . -..-. . - .!'~'- .J-..t..~-.-ti..:tJ~-l-i1-.-.-I.JJ}fT.'--.......-:.+....'--i~ -~-.-'"'.-.f...::n~H...,.
. .::.... ..t~. :.....r.: '-';'. ~.:.::.::.;~..:.~~M.(:..::: ...-;;...;~_:.::-. '.:;'.:. ~,-~L.:~it,).l:f3..c~:..:.~1:. i. -I.~.--.t.~.,"^'._.....;...; ,;.~ ~t.:-:{::~!ti~.~.-:.Y
. __. ...'-...... t+~ - '-... ;J:----.-.....- --I,. --.-........ . . -- :tt:.Y!-l-" ,,, ., . ... - m.. . -t. 1': . it.. - - .... r,. ;:B.:,l-
_; :};~,u: . .<~'~{t7dji:0,:=?~2:~t~:[~w:~~.-~~~:;':;:~.~ ~m~~1:~[~i{:~ttJ~flJ1:~,~'f r1~ ~.1~J~i~;
, .'- ..-..-.'~----- ____J.._.. - '-. ,.'.r-....'----....L..t.l...- :I."-:-' ,---. -... .... ..., .:-,~..---~-;.-..- ....;..;+.-1, -I (hIE" tt:h Ii..,' .. - .rnf't*'..... I, d., ::t.:' f1'I-'~-
:' ... [: i:'~- ..... ~~~d~~"l$t1g~:~t}~i~.i,lif_ill~:~1'ltjf~:t!i~~~~
.~w,.
__.a._1\OI!
---
J:lIBIZl .~ '-'''_..I..L
.,,~
4. 1/..
-
-~
001
~~
~i
OOfi
~'::
'"
~
~~
Z
evIl.D11l8'~
~.
---
I..
.
~.i~ .~f.~h..J. c'tlfr.~;"'f. '.. . .,' . .. ..-..,..;~,.- '~.'T'.'. . '83':.'!ttr ,.'
, ;;
;.~' . h. ~::: ',._: :u.-::::-~..!:t';,r
~ J
", .~...-'..'.. '.
',; I:
" ,
...-(............ ",-,',-0
.~ . ~ . .
,_.. ..
,-.-.,\ .
..... --..:-..!.;.. --':~.i l;l 1..!L-:..n_,.l;H;l_:_~I,.,._.e:L;..-,-,a (}:;1~e:eT .-.-...-.e.;l+-e::~-,-,_. ~;.L. ;-""''''-''-:''1'' "I~ .,-" , ""i---j-..:--;oo
. ..... :'". :;-i-h-:.. ".;-;::..:.:~~,..~.t:":-:"-~"H-!...:..:.;J';'f:-':'~~,,_>1-:<.'.:'::::: ii;-tr.t...,..:t"::-:'r-:-'i.tjf~:'!.i~:':":,';~~";';-:";~ . ,,~;"'>'i':' "'N' ...!.:~.::':
.
.
~~~
__....,.1............
~iiI
-"l
~I
~g-
~i
Uj.
i~
~I
~1>lG>.2>
~
~....
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO.:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
CITY CODE BY CHANGING THE ZONING MAP
The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain:
1. PROPERTY. The property is depicted on the map attached to this Ordinance as
Exhibit "A".
2. AMENDMENT. The property is rezoned from "RA" (Single Family) to "RB" (Duplex
Residential).
3. ZONING MAP. The zoning map is changed to designate the property as RB (Duplex
Residential)
4. SAVING In all other ways, the City Code will remain in full force and effect.
5. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance will be in effect from and after its passage and
publication according to law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this
,2001.
day of
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
AllbST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
I;
I
~
OO~
m~
()
.g rR~
~ ."..
ra' on
::T
...... ---.----.,
@ ;
~'- .-
gl~i~!
o i_..J
() I i (0
;::;:
'<
a
en
C!:
:E
a
CD
...,
E
..
!
~
~o
N)>
~-f
om
o
~te~
J' ':~~_
'''. "....., " ,
Engineering Department
-.. u --...r..-..--.--.-.-r".----~--..
of as-built plans as they appear in the City of Stillwater
records and land records as they appear in various
Washington County offices_
The drawings should be used for refrence purposes
only. The City of Stillwater and Washington County
are not responsible for any inaccuracies.
STIr
2001
OOC4OC201 i:I
.".,
SEE MAP PAGE 80
1"..
':xl ...~..
:..,.,..
g::
~:Lj
~.
~
:!o
:(J)
iO
i
3.
~
m
......
I\.)
---- ----__1. ____c~__~ l
-TY .. ROAD s:; I , --SOUTH-------
..... ------~~~--- --'\'... .......
. -.-...-..---...----...
~
l\
\
"
.,
: ! i
'-.S.
---"
01
o
! j'~ ~ :
Uj ,\ d~
I' ?it :
.1 \.m--
:. '., '.,,~ ..'...
" . .' "
. ,". ,,\ ,
", l\
I .,~; ,
" y>',lJIl.
\; \~\
-.-- It ..-,.;
._, ..:.-.------,.-.
II
~----..----------- -----,,-It..~.-..
" '.on - .. -,..-;oj ,
...i~ ~ ~
ro, m.. 0) 0'> ~:.:
'Mooe
,(J1 --..,J-Ol :
...
~
......
~
<D
!
t"'C3.
-i
o -hi'
01 '
o
...
'..
....
......
a!!\,~ ....Jo.
~.~ : ~
.. c I\.)
GRE1liY - ~~ -
, STReET - --!....
.-'--'---.--"'
~g :..
~ a'S1.
m "~
...... a:;j
tA~ftfSt-: t
lC NO 872lW4
OUT
-.~h, .--....A,.,...:.
(J) ~m
o =0
<D ...
'''U~
-/---~,._.__._._.._-----------,-
.
(-/ ---
----..---
\
\
\
\ ~ I~
~ ~ -
\ ~l
_L !!/
,.....
...~
0>
......
-.(J;
~
......
o
<D
~
0>
~
~
I
~
m
'"
<D
~
ft
)b · / .
c. '~\,----
en
m
m
s:
)> .... "'
~ ~A
U _ \ ",..u I.. / 3U,' 30 SOJ
'"0 . WIDE STORM,. EASeMENT I! L
)> 0:> " CO I I I
G> ~ \ 0:>.\ ....Jo.l / /
m I\.) CO '\ -'" l>\ 01;; ~ II I . .
~ f ~ / ~ ~ \ VJ \.... ~ / / ;:1
,!..j -' .. / // ~ ~- \,. ~. .. ...- ...... /! OJ
. ~ ;I .#-' ~...... -, "'g ;! -"
I I}/ 1; .J~.I
,:. / ,..... ~.. '--.......... ~ . -. ... 'J ill
. .... / V.J,,~ ,........... .\ "'.0>
o 1!1 -',. ~ / 0 .. V.J ..... .. ... "'...
.. / 0 '- O:>,fI-/-<>
l!I CO .\ <D .l!l,i CO ~ -" / ~... II
' . 8' ~O~CO
..." /' / .... .<to" - 0 \ l.... , .. / II
'"""" I ~- '''Ill CO \ .' -.0.. I ...<<2'
JJ . CO ~---' . '___'n_.. / N _/ 00 30 30
:::> ,i / 00 0 ~ CO .. . ~<,~_/..;;_{ If --" .
:.n It! 0 ~ .. Q) " 0 & ~-/.- -....., / .t;:... r
/ r."'\ t> '-8 \~ _! {t}.- _..... ~a:....... I ~
--..- ...
EXHIBIT A
_.21"__-__;.._-..--..-,.
-- ---:~/-
~:~......
....:~
.-_...,.___., ,..0... .'
t r~! ~j,~ '
· -0; 1:::0 '-F
i -I{JA r
"-~---~ en ~
.- )>
-I
m
;0
'.~ p-:~
i:,~
""
,,.
~;
:i
'... ---_._---.~
.
o
I
..
.~ ~.c.
_C)" Il~
~,._- .
~--'ttO .-.' -'.. . - - . ,.:.;.;;..Jr._
V1.21 '38.00
~
01
o
~
...
-'"
i~
01
~
J
=
.
.....
'''0
o
z
o
~~
i------.--., ~--------- ~
\ ~_.--~
;:j
23 Q
.....
..u
" 11
..
~ ~ ,~
VJ 0.) ~
~ -'" II IJ:)
mil I\) II 'J>
'0 ,_ ..-.-1_
_ sourn
o
_11_," E.' ..
~--': ;--J - i-~ ~ '
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
~f6
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shawn Sanders, Assistant City Engineer
DATE: June 2,2003
RE: 2003 Street Sealcoat Project
Project 2003-06
DISCUSSION:
Bids for the 2003 Street Sealcoat Project were opened on Monday, June 2, 2003. The City
received four bids with the low bid of $82,607.50 submitted by Allied Blacktop Co. (see
attached resolution). The engineer's estimate f<?r this project was $100,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION,
I recommend that the City accept the bids submitted for the 2003 Street Sealcoat Project,
Project 2003-06 and award the contract to Allied Blacktop Co. with a low bid of$82,607.50.
ACTION REOUIRED:,
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting the
Resolution 2003- ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2003
STREETSEALCOATPROJECT
ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
2003 STREE~.SEALCOAT PROJECT
(project 2003-06)
.
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2003 Street Sealcoat Project, bids
were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying
with the advertisement;
BIDDER
BID AMOUNT.
Allied Blacktop Co., Maple Grove, Minnesota
$82,607.50
Pearson Bros., Inc., Loretto, Minnesota
fEER'S ESTIMATE
$85,959.25
$111,688.25
$117,353.68
$100,000.00
Astech Corporation, St. Cloud, Minnesota
Caldwell Asphalt Co., Inc., Hawick, Minnesota
WHEREAS, itappears that Allied Blacktop Co. of Maple Grove, Minnesota is the lowest .
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY tHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Allied
Blacktop Co. of Maple Grove, Minnesota in the name of the City of Stillwater for the sealcoating
of streets according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and
on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits
made with their bids, except the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City Council this 3rd day of June 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
AIThST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
MemorandUlll
To:
Mayor and City Council ?,t*J.
Shawn Sanders, Assistant City Engineer '
From:
Date: May 29,2003
Subject: Bid Opening for 2003 Street Sea1coat Project (project 2003-06)
Bid opening for the 2003 Street Sea1coat Project (project 2003-06) will be on Monday, June
2,2003. Results will be presented to City Council at the Tuesday, June 3, 2003 meeting.
.
.
.,f-
i
v'
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF STILL WATER
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
In Re: The Application of
Matthew McGuire and
Andrea Saterbak
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS AND
ORDER
Case No. V/03-31
The City Council convened the hearing on May 6, 2003 at the Council Chambers in City
Hall on the Application of Matthew McGuire and Andrea Saterbak for a variance for
construction of a residential, single family home with a 12 foot front yard setback (30 feet
required) and with a 81 foot bluff setback (100 feet required) in the RB, Duplex Residential
District and Bluffland/Shoreland Overlay District. The matter was before the Council since the
City Council must decide variances requested in the Bluffland/Shoreland District. The Planning
Commission previously approved the request.
At the hearing, the City Council considered the report of Steve Russell, the City
Community Development Director, testimony and exhibits submitted by the applicants, the
testimony of the applicants and correspondence submitted by James F. Lammers, attorney for the
applicants, Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting, photographs of the property in
question, a photocopy of a survey of the property, the testimony of neighbors of the applicant,
and the Planning file prepared by City Staff for this variance application.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the documents that have been made a part of Case File
V /03- 31, upon testimony of all those who offered testimony, including those persons above
enumerated, and upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, the City Council of the City
of Stillwater makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the subject parcel is located within the RB Duplex BluffIand/Shoreland
Residential District with a dwelling already built upon the parcel, with a front yard setback of
approximately 20 feet and a 45.6 foot setback from the bluffline. The dwelling was constructed
long before the adoption of a BluffIand/Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance enacted by the
City pursuant to a State law that required municipalities to regulate provisions of the Wild and
Scenic River Act of 1973 as adopted by the Congress ofthe United States.
2.
That current standards for the zoning district require structures to be set back from
the front property line a distance of 30 feet, from the Shoreline a distance of 100 feet and from
the BluffIine, a distance of 40 feet.
3. The applicants propose to remove the existing dwelling and construct a new
residence.
4. The existing residential structure encroaches into the 40 foot bluffIand setback
and the 100 foot shoreland setback.
5. A total of274 square feet of the existing residential structure is in violation of the
current bluffIand and shoreland setbacks and will be removed.
- 2 -
~
i
'-,
.
.
.
'ii-
r'
.
.
.
6. 191 square feet of the existing structure presently encroaches on the 40 foot
bluffland setback and 83 feet presently encroaches on the 100 foot shoreland setback.
7. The existing deck, whish is 381 square feet in size and which ispresently located
totally within the shoreland and bluffland setback area will be removed.
8. The area of the proposed new deck is 274 square feet and that will require a
variance of 19 feet from the 100 foot shoreland setback. The proposed structure will also require
front yard setback variance of 13.5 feet since it is proposed to be constructed with a setback of
165. feet and the required setback is 30 feet.
9. It is proposed to reconstruct the residential structure so that the roof line of the
new structure will be at or near the roof line of the existing dwelling. The new structure will
have three bedrooms similar to the existing structure.
10. The existing drainage pattern will not be significantly changed. The roof water
will be directed toward the street, rather than toward the river.
11. No modifications of the septic system will be required regarding this project and
the existing septic system was installed in 1999. The applicants propose to hook up to City
sewer as soon as it becomes available.
12. The home is proposed to be built of natural wood and 8t. Croix Valley limestone.
13. The proposed new home will continue to be visually inconspicuous from the
fIver. No existing trees are proposed to be affected by the construction project and there will be
professional landscaping done as a part ofthe project.
- 3 -
~
14. The new home will be setback further from the St. Croix River than the
neighboring homes on each side and the front yard setbacks will be approximately the same as
the neighboring homes.
.
15. None of their neighbors have voiced any objections to the new structure, as
proposed.
16. Because of the various setback requires, this 13,457 square foot lot is unbuildable
without the requested variances. The applicants have shown that they would like to use their
property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the Ordinances.
17. Because of the overlapping setback requirements, a residential structure cannot be
located on the subject property without variances being granted. The applicants have made
every reasonable effort to fully comply with the bluffland and shoreland setbacks and, as a result,
they do require a variance for the deck which will be much further removed from the River than
the original deck and front yard setbacks.
.
18. The use of the subject property for residential purposes cannot happen without
variances being granted and the plight of my clients is due to the circumstances unique to this
property and not created by them.
19. The variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality since
the proposed home will be set back further from the river than the neighboring homes and will
set back a similar distance from the street as the neighboring homes.
20. Strict enforcement of the setback requirements IS impractical since the result
would be that no home could be located on this property.
.
- 4-
.'
.
.
.
21. The granting of the variances would not be of substantial detriment to adjacent
properties and would not entirely impair the purpose and the intent of the City Ordinances or the
public interest or adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan. The dimensional standards are
complied with to the greatest extent practicable.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. This matter is properly before the City Council pursuant to procedure outlined in
the Stillwater City Code.
2. That the property cannot be put to reasonable use as a single family residence if
used under the conditions allowed by the zoning ordinance.
3. That the applicant has established a "hardship" within the meaning of the City
Code and Minn. Stat. ~ 462.257.
ORDER
The application for a variance as prayed for in this proceeding be and the same hereby is
granted, subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The colors of the house must be earth tone as approved by the Community
Development Director.
2. A drainage plan must be reviewed by the City Engineer before a building
permit is issued directing drainage away from the bluff.
3. The condition of the on-site septic system must be inspected and certified
as up-to-date for size of structure by a licensed inspector.
4. The applicants must connect to City sewer services when services are
available.
5: A landscape plan must be prepared and submitted to the City for review
and approval. The plan must screen the deck from the River and provide
stabilization of the riverbank.
- 5 -
6.
A drainage/erosion control plan must be submitted, reviewed and
approved with the building permit application to protect the site and the
River from construction activity and runoff.
CITY OF STILLWATER
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
- 6-
'.
.
.
.
.
River Town Restoration
P.o. Box 702
Stillwater,:MN 55082
www.rlronline.ore
June 2, 2003
To: Members of the City Council:
River Town Restoration and the Stillwater Catholic Workers Community have been donated the
house and property across from Lakeview Hospital at 912 West Churchill Street. We plan on restoring
the old house and putting a new compatible addition on the rear. The house, to be named Peace House,
will serve as transition housing for homeless women and children.
As part of our restoration and fund raising, we would like permission to erect a temporary sign in
the front ofthe house. The sign would be roughly three feet by four feet. It would read:
"Coming soon...", "PEACE HOUSE", "www.peacehouse.org."
a. The sign would be in place 3-6 months. When the house is restored, we definitely would not want
~y signage on the property.
We have mentioned putting up such a sign to Lakeview Hospital and the neighbors; they have
expressed no objections.
Thank you.
) ---'- /
1--ddc-L-{-1 jl ~
Rosalind Fendi, President
W: 612-316-2510
H: 651-430-2089
.
.#
~!:S:.I\l1 0 l. \!1JA.:Jn.LI'HJ I UI'll"UUI\l1 T , lVII\!,
rlo<\J!: ~
;,; , .
.
.
.
O:::ll q"U fOC::",
.JUI~.".U" C.~:J,
April 17, 2003
MayoriPlanner
City/Township
Address
City, MN, Zip
Su~jcct: Grant Funds tor All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Development
Dear:
Starting November I, 2004, FEMA will require that all communities have mitigation .
plans in place prior to receiving funds under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
(HMGP). The MN Division of Emergency Management is now soliciting interest
through the use of the latest HMGP funds. 1berc is a 25% non-federal match
requirement for this grant funding.
The state is encouraging county-level plans that will be multi-jurisdictional, including all
cities and townships under the same plan. The planning process is a cooperative one,
requiring input from planners and emergency management persons from local, county
and state levels along with public participation.
Washington County will submit an application for this grant on behalf of all cities and
townships who would like to participate and become integrated into a cooperative
planning process. The state is requiring that we have a resolution from each city OT
township who desire to be covered under the county's All-Hazard Mitigation Plan along
with our application. We will include a sample resolution with this letter as well ac; a
"questions and answers" informational document. It will be essential that we receive a
decision (rom your city or township signifying a yes or no in the very near future. Our
application is due on May 1 SI however the state has offered to extend the application
process for a short period to allow for resolutions to be completed. The MN Division of
Emergency Management has offered to send an individual to our county to present an
informational workshop on this subject The workshop is scheduled tor Monday, May 5,
2003 from 1 :30 to 3:00 P.M. The workshop will he held in Stillwater at the T.aw
Enforcement Center on the first floor in the EOC. In order that we can comply with the
state's requirements, we are asking for resolutions to be in our offices not later than May
21 , 2003. r f you cannot attend the workshop and have question:.;, please leel (ree to ca1l
us.
JUN-03-2003 09:57
97%
P.02
651 430 7623
~tNI ~Y: WA~H1NbIUN CUUNIY, MNj
b~l 4;jU Ib~;jj
JUN-;j-U;J t:l:~bj
We support the state's encouragement of a county-level plan and look forward to
working with you in the near future. Please know that we are willing to support your
resolution process in any way necessary to help you in this matter. We tmderstnnd this is
short notice and again, would welcome your phone calls if you would like further
information.
Thank you very much for your timely attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
..
Deb Paige
Emergency Services Manager
Washington County, MN.
651-430-7621
Deb.Paisze<w,co. wash i n2ton .mn. us
Cc: Lowell Johnson, Deputy Director. Public Health and Environment
JUN-03-2003 09:57
651 430 7623
97%
r'Abt ;j/~
P.03
","--
......
.
.
.
~~NI ~y: WA~HlNUIUN CUUNIY, MN;
l:l~' 4::30 1l:l~3;
JUN.3.03 8:26;
PAGE 4/5
...~
j
.
May 6, 2003
Mayor/Planner City/Township
Address
City, MN, Zip
Subject: Grant Funds for All-Hazard Mitigation Plan Development
Dear:
.
An informational workshop commlUlicating All-Hazard Mitigation planning details was
conducted at the Washington County Government Center on Monday, May 5, 2003.
Starting November 1,2004, .Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will
require that all communities have mitigation plans approved by FEMA in order to receive
funds lUlder the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The MN Division of
Emergency Management is now accepting applications for grants to local governments to
assist in the preparation of these plans. A 25% non-federal match is required in this
program.
Wa<:>hinl:,rton County will submit an application for this grant on behalf of all cities and
tOWTlships wishing to participate in this planning process. The application requires a
resolution from each city or township requesting to be covered under the county's All-
Hazard Mitigation Plan. To comply with the state's f:,7Uidelines, it is essential that we
receive a resolution ITom your city or township in our office no later than June 1,2003.
A sample resolution is included with this letter.
Again, we support the state's encouragement of a county-level plan and look forward to
working with you in the near future. If you cannot have a resolution in our office by June
1) 2003, or have questions, please feel free to call us.
Thank you for your timely attention to this matter.
S inccrcl y,
Deb Paige
Emergency Services Manager
Washington County, MN.
651-430-7621
Deh.Paig-e@co.washinllton.mn.us
.
Cc:
Lowell Johnson, Deputy Director, Public Health and 'Environment
JUN-03-2003 09:57
651 430 7623
97%
P.04
....-
,
RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN A HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING PROCESS
.
WHEREAS, the County of Washington is participating in a hazard mitigation planning
process as established under the Hazard Mitigation Act of 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Act establishes a framework for the development of a county hazard mitigation
plan; and
WHEREAS, the Act as part of the planning process requires public involvement and local
coordination among neighboring local units of government and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the plan must include a risk assessment including past hazards, hazards that
threaten the county, maps of hazards, an estimate of structures at risk, estimate of
potential dollar losses for each hazard, a general description of land uses and
development trends; and
WHEREAS, the plan must include a mitigation strategy including goals and objectives and an
action plan identifying specific mitigation projects and costs: and
WHEREAS, the plan must include a maintenance or implementation process including plan
updates, integration of plan into other planning documents and how the county will maintain
public participation and coordination; and .
WHEREAS, the draft plan will be shared with Minnesota Planning for coordination of state
agency review and comment on the draft; and
WHEREAS, approval of the all hazard mitigation plan will make the county eligible to receive
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) project grants; and
WHEREAS, this resolution does not preclude the city from preparing its own plan sometime in
the future should it desire to do so.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Stillwater supports the county hazard
mitigation planning effort, wishes to join with the county in preparing the plan and recognizes
that the plan will apply within the city.
Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 3rd day of June, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
jo.
FYI
.
May 22, 2003
Members of the City Council
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear City Council Members,
Once again, the Stillwater City Council is in the midst of making a far-reaching
decision for which there will be no looking back. This decision will affect the
safety of hundreds of children living on the South Hill, and the lifestyle of
thousands of Stillwater residents. It will affect scores of businesses on Greeley
Street, and it will have a permanent affect on how the rest ofthe world perceives
our beautiful, one-of-a-kind, historic city.
You have the awesome power of deciding whether we will look like every other
small town across America that has an interstate highway running through it, or
whether we will do something bold, beautiful and different.
.
Two years ago, in response to the concerns of the Southhill Neighborhood
Resident group, the Council agreed not to accept the closing of any intersection
along Highway 36 and promised to consider a slower-speed parkway from
Highway 5 to the river. Some of you even won votes toward your seats on the
Council with campaign promises of supporting a parkway boulevard for this
section of Highway 36.
Now is the time for you to stand up to the powers that be at MNDot and support
a scenic parkway design for Highway 36 with NO intersection closures. Firmly
taking this position would ensure the safety of school children at four elementary
and junior high schools on the South Hill. It would ensure the viability of the
retail businesses along Greeley Street. It would protect the small-town lifestyle
of the residents of the South HilI. It would maintain the safety and longevity of
our local streets. But, most importantly, it would give our beautiful Stillwater
the look and feel of a scenic and historic town.
.
Rather than racing through here at 70 mph and creating a concrete barrier
between the sister towns of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, a reduced-speed
parkway boulevard would encourage people to stop for a while and visit a local
store or restaurant. It would encourage pedestrian access to the businesses on
both sides of the highway, and it would maintain the safety and integrity of our
neighborhoods.
It
"
.
A scenic parkway with fIower beds and shrubbery from Highway 5 to the river
would also create an incredibly beautiful entranceway to Minnesota and
Stillwater. Travelers would say "Wow! Isn't this gorgeous! This must be
historic Stillwater!" rather than, "What town did we just go through? Are we in
Minneapolis yet?"
Once the bulldozers come and the earthmoving equipment arrives there will be
no more turning back. Now is the time to take a stand and make our town
something truly unique and special. Now is the time for you to keep your word
to the thousands of residents who do not want to see a freeway with hundreds of
vehicles traveling at high speeds down their residential streets. Now is the time
to think about the safety of little grade school children crossing very busy streets.
Now is the time to say NO to MNDot and build us a parkway!
Sincerely,
/) )/7
~~/";4~
Laurie Maher
3018 Marine Circle
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
.
cc: Stillwater Gazette
Courier News
.
.
\ May 21,2003
City of Stillwater
Mayor and Council
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor and Council,
The Hope House 8th annual fundraising auction was onc~ again a great
success. I vvanfto personally-thank you for allowing Hope House t6 close
. Everett Street for our event as well as providing us with the necessary
barricades to do so.
\.
frt..
The 'auction has provided the S1. Croix Valleycommunity'awohderful
- opportunity to work together! We appreciate your contil1uedsupport.
Again thank you.
C~~~e.'.~Y..:~--;k:""~....'. .
2/ . ........-
," --..-..-.. " TO.- _..~~ . ..\
c ,,----
SCbtt Zahren
Executive Director
.,,,,,,,'$
,
r
.
\4'
~
,
\~
~_.
"
~
HOPE HOUSE
of St. Croix Valley
9-51 No. Everett St.
Stillw2ter, lv1t'-J 55082
(651) 351-0907
FP,X 351-9510
.hOU~~~~I:I~~2ter.org
\<tI'
-.
, " ~ Hope House of St CroiX Vailey provides a non- Judgmental home and compassionate care that respects the'dlgHity of peopleltvl~g with H}VI AIDS"
May 22, 2003
STILLWAT~R. TOW,,! BOARD MEt: lING
Town Hall
.
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson Jim Hiniker, Supervisors Sheila-Marie Untiedt,
David Johnson, Duane Laabs and Jim Doriott. Also, Attorney
Tom Scott, Planner Dick Thompson, Treasurer Gloria Sell and
Police Chief Steve Nelson.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P Laabs/Doriott moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(5 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Untiedt/Laabs moved to approve the 5/8/03 Stillwater town
board meeting minutes as written. (5 ayes)
3. TREASURER-
1. Claims were approved and checks #16308 thru #16316 were approved
for payment.
2. Raleigh Trucking check #16308 will be held until their bond information
is forthcoming and brush is removed from 110th Street, Quarry and Quirt.
.
4. ATTORNEY-
1. M/S/P Laabs/Doriott moved to approve the Barnholdt lot line adjustment
per the attorney's review and recommendation. (5 ayes)
2. Keefer Park Donation - Supervisors feel they are being consistent with their
established policy and that the park donation amount is legal and reasonable.
The attorney will relay this information to Mr. Keefer.
3. Storage of vehicles Ordinance #128 - M/S/P Johnson/Untiedt moved to
approve the new outside storage ordinance #128. (5 ayes)
5. PLANNER-
1. M/S/P Johnson/Laabs moved to adopt the zoning checklist as presented
by Planner Thompson. The planner will review it with the building
inspector. (5 ayes)
2. A letter was sent to Mr. Wallin - 10520 Stonebridge Trail about his home
occupation and lack of certificate of compliance. He has since removed a
business sign as directed by the planner. Next agenda.
3. Janeen Thatcher will be asked to attend the next meeting regarding her
memo of 5/16/03.
4. Fees for certificates of compliance for buildings in front of dwellings will be .
added to the township fee schedule.
5. The planner will review the entire township fee schedule for possible changes.
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 5/22/03
Page Two
. 6. M/S/P Untiedt/Laabs moved to approve the all hazard mitigation planning
process resolution as prepared by Washington County. (5 ayes) (The
resolution is attached to the original minutes of this meeting.)
6. POUCE CHIEF -
1. Requested better communication with the park shelter manager.
2. Discussed the peddler/solicitor issue. A concerned resident was present to
express his opinion.
3. Updated the Wallin dog situation. He pleaded guilty. Spike is considered
"potentially dangerous" and will carry an implanted chip that so states.
7. CLERK-
1. Mentioned that the township can opt out of the federal community grant
program at this time. The township does not intend to opt,out of the program.
2. The school district elections next fall will be delegated to the communities.
The county will run the elections for the communities if necessary using the
local election judges and government buildings.
3. Railings on the town hall front steps are rusting.
4. The outside flag needs to be retired and a new flag put up. The clerk will
order another flag for the future.
ea. PARK REPORT -
1. Field trip was made to Little Carnelian Park. Recommended that a few benches
be put in place by the lake.
2. M/S/P Johnson/Laabs moved to authorize $5,000.00 to maintain, identify
and improve Stonehenge Trail and Curtiss Hills Trails. (5 ayes)
3. Park members would like to have a dedication for the park and a new sign.
9. WATER MANAGEMENT - County will act as a facilitator to consolid,ate water groups
in the future. In the meantime budgetary costs and representation issues must be
dealt with.
10. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned at 10:06 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
.
Approved
Diane Ward
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Pat Raddatz [Pat.Raddatz@co.washington.mn.us]
Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:28 PM
Pat Raddatz
Washington County Board Agenda
.
Washington County Board of Commissioners
14949 62nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Washington County, County Board Agenda
June 3, 2003 - 9:00 a.m.
1. 9:00 - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
2. 9:00 - Comments from the Public
Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a
responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or
not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the
Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it
to the County Board secretary or the County Administrator. The County
Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and
address, and present your comments. You are encouraged to limit your
presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the
right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant,
repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue
that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. The chair may
also limit the number of individual presentations to accommodate the
scheduled agenda items.
.
3. 9:10 - Consent Calendar
4. 9:10 - General Administration - Jim Schug, County Administrator
Legislative Update
5. 9:40 - Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the
full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest
and information, or raise questions to the staff. This ac::tion is not
intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any
action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future
board meeting.
6. Board Correspondence
7. 10:00 - Adjourn
8. 10:00 to 11:30 - Board Workshop with Office of Administration
.
Continue Discussion on the Draft 2003-2007 Capital Improvement Plan
1
************************************************************************
Meeting Notices
June 2 - Library Board
.:30 a.m., 8595 Central Park - Woodbury
June 3 - Personnel Committee
11:45 a.m., Washington County Government Center
June 4 - Plat Commission
8:30 a.m., Washington County Government Center
June 4 - Metro Transitways Development Board
8:30 a.m., AMC, 125 Charles Avenue - St. Paul
June 5 - Metropolitan Counties Energy Task Force
9:00 a.m., AMC, 125 Charles Avenue - St. Paul
************************************************************************
Washington County Board of Commissioners
Consent Calendar - June 3, 2003
Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine
business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote.
Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for
discussion and/or separate action.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
.dministration
A. Approval of the May 20 and 27, 2003 Board meeting minutes.
B. Approval to appoint Jeanine Swanson to the Workforce Investment
Board as a Small Business Representative to a first term expiring June
30, 2005.
Community Corrections
C. Approval of resolutions setting adult supervision fees and waiver
criteria, and increase fees for child custody evaluation and mediation.
Community Services
D. Approval of contract with Presbyterian Homes to provide assisted
living plus services and Medicare certified home health services to
eligible Washington County residents.
E. Approval of 2003..2005 contract with Woodbury Personal Assisted
Living Unit to provide assisted living plus services and Medicare
certified home health services to eligible Washington County Residents.
F. Approval of 2003-2005 contract with Washington County Association
for Senior Citizens, dba "Croixdale Residence and Apartments, to
provide basic health related services and provide additional
edividualized services to eligible persons.
Financial Services
2
G. Approval to create a new fund pursuant to the Minnesota Citizens'
Personal Protection Act of 2003 and corresponding MN Statute.
Transportation and Physical Development
H. Approval of resolution, final payment to Tower Asphalt, Inc. in the
amount of $37,287 for CSAH 13 reconstruction.
.
1. Approval of resolution, Minnesota Trail Assistance Program for Star
Trail Snowmobile Association.
J. Approval of contract with Short, Elliot, Hendrickson, Inc. for
consultant services to complete a corridor optimization plan for signal
timing on CSAH 13 and CSAH 16 in Woodbury conditioned upon the execution
of a contract as approved by law.
K. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the cooperative construction
agreement with the City of Cottage Grove for road construction on CSAH
13, Hinton Avenue.
L. Approval of License No. 5421-W (CSAH 15 related) and 5422-W (CSAH 7
related) between Wisconsin Central Ltd and Washington County to use
railroad right-of-way for roadway purposes.
Pat Raddatz, Administrative Assistant
Washington County
Phone: (651) 430-6014
e-mail: pat.raddatz@co.washington.mn.us
.
.
3
Diane Ward
From:
.ent:
0:
Subject:
Pat Raddatz [Pat.Raddatz@co.washington.mn.us]
Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:29 PM
Pat Raddatz
Washington County Board Agenda - 5/27/03
Washington County Board of Commissioners
14949 62nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Washington County, County Board Agenda
May 27, 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
1. 9:00 - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
2. 9:00 - Comments from the Public
Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a
responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or
not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the
Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it
to the County Board secretary or the County Administrator. The County
Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and
address, and present your comments. You are encouraged to limit your
presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the
.i9ht to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant,
epetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue
that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. The chair may
also limit the number of individual presentations to accommodate the
scheduled agenda items.
3. 9:10 - Consent Calendar
4. 9: 10 0 Assessment, Taxpayer Services and Elections - Kevin
Corbid, Director
2002 Annual Report
5. 9:20 -Community Corrections - Tom Adkins, Director
Set Adult Supervision Fees and Increase Fees for Child Custody
Evaluation and Mediation
6. 9:30 - General Administration - Molly O'Rourke, Deputy
Administrator
A. Carnelian-Marine Watershed District Appointments
B. Proclamations of Goodwill for the June 11, 2003 Marriage in the
Kingdom of Tonga
.. Legislative Update
7. 9:50 - Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
1
'.
This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the
full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest
and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not
intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any
action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future
board meeting.
.
8. Board Correspondence
9. 10:10 - Adjourn
10. 10:15 to 11:00 - Board Workshop with Public Health and Environment
Curbside Recycling Program Improvements and Funding
11. 11:00 to 11:30 - Board Workshop with Assessment, Taxpayer Services
and Elections
Discuss Operating Hours at County License Centers
************************************************************************
Meeting Notices
May 27 - Planning Advisory Commission
7:00 p.m., Washington County Government Center
May 28 - Regional Solid Waste Coordinating Board
10:30 a.m., 2099 University Avenue West - St. Paul
May 29 - Red Rock Corridor
3:30 p.m., Cottage Grove City Hall
.
************************************************************************
Washington County Board of Commissioners
Consent Calendar - May 27, 2003
Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine
business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote.
Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for
discussion and/or separate action.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
Administration
A. Approval of the May 13, 2003 Board meeting minutes.
B. Approval to appoint Keith Smith to the Workforce Investment Board as
a Small Business Representative to a first term expiring June 30, 2005.
Assessment, Taxpayer Services and Elections
C. Approval of resolution, application for lawful gambling exempt
permit from the Scandia Marine Lions Club to be used at the Washington
County Fairgrounds.
.
Community Services
2
D. Approval of resolution, Community Development Block Grant Subgrantee
agreement with the City of Woodbury and authorize the County Board Chair
and County Administrator to sign the agreements.
.UbIiC Health and Environment
E. Approval of contract between the county and the City of Afton for
individual sewage treatment system permitting and inspection.
Transportation and Physical Development
F. Approval to use five vehicle park permits for free drawings during
the Washington County fair, July 30 - August 3, 2003.
Pat Raddatz, Administrative Assistant
Washington County
Phone: (651) 430-6014
e-mail: pat.raddatz@co.washington.mn.us
.
.
3