HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-01-07 CC Packet
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 03-01
Council Chambers, 216 North Fourth Street
January 7, 2003
tlIIIiEGULAR MEETING
"ECESSED MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Possible approval of agreement with Max Tudo for the Cayuga
2. Discussion on lobbyists
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
STAFF REPORTS
1.Police Chief
2. Fire Chief
3. City Clerk
4. Director of Admin.
5. Community Dev. Dir .
6. City Engineer/PWD
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approval of December 17, 2002
OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEWLY ELECTED MEMBERS OF
ADJOURN
CALL TO ORDER
~OLL CALL
~ECOGNITION OF OUTGOING COUNCILM ERS1i#llii.
1. Adoption and Presentation of Resol.I;JtiOh_* mrylending Terry Zoller and Gene "Taco" Bealka
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGAT NSii& CQMMENDATIONS
,;SoH'
1. Nile Kriesel, County Commissio .%7
meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of
action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction
concerns expressed.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portio'l..P
the meeting agenda. The...COf!J
to staff regarding investigati~{1 0
CONSENT AGENDA* .
1. Resolution 2 113_01, ng payment of bills
2. Resolution , abating assessment for Parcel No. 34.030.20.23.0089
3. Approval 0 .. for lobbyist for Middle St. Croix WMO lobbing Effort
4. Resolu pproving Minnesota premises permit for gambling for the Forest lake Athletic
Asso . . Croix Music Cafe, 317 South Main Street, Stillwater, MN
5. Res 4, approving renewal Agreement with The Sandcreek Group for Employee
Assista ogram Services.
6. Consideratl of request for Garbage Waiver from Jill Coleman
7. Resolution 2003-05, Resolution Relating to Financing of Certain Proposed Projects to be Undertaken
by the City of Stillwater; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations Under the
Internal Revenue Code
. 8. Resolution 2003-06, resolution approving amended Fire Protection Contract with the City of Grant
9. Resolution 2003-07, approval of Forestry Consultant contract
10. Resolution 2003-11, renewal of Towing License for 2003
11. Request to purchase three computers for Engineering/Public Works Dept.
12. Request to purchase sign making machine and cutter
tf
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. V/02-77. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider an appeal of the
Planning Commissions decision on a request from Dan Challeen for a variance to construct a 24' x
28' garage with a 12 foot setback (30 feet required) at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in the RB, Two
Family Residential District applicant. Notices were mailed to affected propert owners and
published in the Stillwater Gazette on December 27, 2002.
Case No. SUB/02-76. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consi
Challeen for a resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres 10
Alley in the RB, Two Family Residential District (continued from Nove
Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in th
December 27,2002. .
Case No. V/02-86. This is the date and time for a public hearing to
Planning Commissions decision on a request from Scott and
yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a varia
percent allowed, 33.5 percent proposed) caused by an e .
Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential
Case No. SUB/02-87. This is the date and time for a u
Scott and Lisa DeMars for a subdivision of Lots 1 a
Lot 1 - 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 - 7,511 square
RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were
published in the Stillwater Gazette on December 2 ,
Case No. SUB/02-83. This is the date and t blic hearing to consider a request from
Robert and Carol Greethurst for a subdivision , Block 1, Linson Addition, 1602 South
Greeley Street, into two lots consisting of Lot 1 760 square feet and Lot 2 - 15,575 square feet
in the RA, Single Family Residential Diict. Notl s were mailed to affected property owners and.
published in the Stillwater Gazette ber 27, 2002.
Case No. SUB/02-63. This is the and e for a public hearing to consider a request from
Anchobaypro, Inc., for a subdivi acre lot into 14 residential lots and one 1.7 acre
commercial lot located on the 5 and south of Curve Crest Blvd in the TH,
Townhouse Residential Dist -C, Business Park Commercial District. Notices were
mailed to affected propert ublished in the Stillwater Gazette on December 27,2002.
13. Request to purchase equipment from State bid - Parks, Public Works, Sewer Depts.
14. Request to purchase computer training coupons - MIS
15. Request to purchase a floor burnisher - Plant/City Hall
16. Request to purchase 2003 Squad Cars - Police
.
2.
st from Dan
3 Schulenberg
meeting ).
azette on
3.
n appeal of the
for a variance to the side
e impervious surface (30
ce lot split located at 603
4.
to consider a request from
olcombe's Addition, into two lots.
at 603 Churchill Street West in the
ffected property owners and
5.
6.
4.
5.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Board and Commis .
nts/Council Representative Appointments
NEW BUSINESS
1.
2.
3.
R lution)
unity Block Grant Application for 2003 (Resolution)
Possible ap
Possible f
30.01,
Setting
Pub'
PETITIONS; S, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICA REQUESTS
COUNCIL REQU ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT .
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by on
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in
which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
2
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 03-01
Council Chambers, 216 North Fourth Street
January 7,2003
Dr a4t" .,;
.EGULAR MEETING
ECESSED MEETING
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Possible approval of agreement with Max Tudo for the Cayuga
2. Discussion on lobbyists
STAFF REPORTS
1.Police Chief
2.Fire Chief
3. City Clerk
4. Director of Admin.
5. Community Dev. Director
6. City Engineer/PWD
7. City Attorney
8. City Administrator
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATI
1. Nile Kriesel, County Commission
nding Terry Zoller and Gene "Taco" Bealka
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Approval of December 17, 2002 City
OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEWLY ELECTED MEMBERS
ADJOURN
CALL TO ORDER
_OLL CALL
RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING COUNCILM
1. Adoption and Presentation of Reso
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of th
the meeting agenda. The Council
to staff regarding investigation of the
uncil meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of
take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction
ncerns expressed.
CONSENT AGENDA*
1. Resolution 2003-01, directing payment of bills
2. Resolution 2003-02, abating assessment for Parcel No. 34.030.20.23.0089
3. Approval of cost sharing for lobbyist for Middle St. Croix WMO Lobbing Effort
4. Resolution 2003-03, approving Minnesota premises permit for gambling for the Forest Lake Athletic
Association at the S1. Croix Music Cafe, 317 South Main Street, Stillwater, MN
5. Resolution 2003-04, approving renewal Agreement with The Sandcreek Group for Employee
Assistance Program Services.
6. Consideration of request for Garbage Waiver from Jill Coleman
7. Resolution 2003-05, Resolution Relating to Financing of Certain Proposed Projects to be Undertaken
by the City of Stillwater; Establishing Compliance with Reimbursement Bond Regulations Under the
. Internal Revenue Code
8. Resolution 2003-06, resolution approving amended Fire Protection Contract with the City of Grant
9. Resolution 2003-07, approval of Forestry Consultant contract
10. Resolution 2003-11, renewal of Towing License for 2003
11. Request to purchase three computers for Engineering/Public Works Dep1.
12. Request to purchase sign making machine and cutter
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. V/02-77. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider an appeal of the
Planning Commissions decision on a request from Dan Challeen for a variance to construct a 24' x
28' garage with a 12 foot setback (30 feet required) at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in the RB, Two .
Family Residential District applicant. Notices were mailed to affected property owners and
published in the Stillwater Gazette on December 27,2002.
Case No. SUBJ02-76. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from Dan
Challeen for a resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres located at 2103 Schulenberg
Alley in the RB, Two Family Residential District (continued from November 13, 2002 meeting).
Notices were mailed to affected property owners and published in the Stillwater Gazette on
December 27,2002.
Case No. Vl02-8G. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider an appeal of the
Planning Commissions decision on a request from Scott and Lisa DeMars for a variance to the side
yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a variance to the impervious surface (30
percent allowed, 33.5 percent proposed) caused by an existing residence lot split located at 603
Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Case No. SUB/02-87. This is the date and time for a public hearing to consider a request from
Scott and Lisa DeMars for a subdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's Addition, into two lots.
Lot 1 - 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 - 7,511 square feet, at 603 Churchill Street West in the
RB, Two Family Residential District. Notices were mailed property owners and
published in the Stillwater Gazette on December 27,20
Case No. SUBJ02-83. This is the date and time f
Robert and Carol Greethurst for a subdivision 0
Greeley Street, into two lots consisting of Lot
in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
published in the Stillwater Gazette on De
Case No. SUB/02-63. This is the date a
Anchobaypro, Inc., for a subdivision 0
commercial lot located on the west
Townhouse Residential District an
mailed to affected property ow
13. Request to purchase equipment from State bid - Parks, Public Works, Sewer Depts.
2.
3.
4.
5.
.
6.
aring to consider a request from
1, Linson Addition, 1602 South
are feet and Lot 2 - 15,575 square feet
mailed to affected property owners and
2.
ublic hearing to consider a request from
lot into 14 residential lots and one 1.7 acre
d south of Curve Crest Blvd in the TH,
usiness Park Commercial District. Notices were
ed in the Stillwater Gazette on December 27,2002.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Board and Commission appo'
uncil Representative Appointments
NEW BUSINESS
1. Election of Vice Mayor (R tion)
2. Possible approval Commu Block Grant Application for 2003
3. Possible first reading of Ordi nce No. 932, An Ordinance Amending Stillwater City Code Chapter
30.01, Subd. 8 by Amending Fees
4. Setting date for canvassing returns from Special Election
5. Public Works Facility Update (available Tuesday)
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
*
All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or.
citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered
separately.
2
.,.
. MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Administrator Hansen
SUBJECT: Lease Agreement for Max Todo - Cayuga
DATE: December 30,2002
In early December I met with Tom and Audrey Huninghake to talk with them about their
lease on the Cayuga. They have requested agenda time at the 4:30 p.m. Workshop
Session on January 7,2003 to discuss the contract.
The lease called for an initial three year term with two one year extensions. In lieu of
rent, Max Todo was to perform certain repairs during the initial 3 year term, as well as
move and secure the barge used for Lumberjack Days.
.
After inspection of the property I found most of the repairs have been made, with a few
exceptions. Mr. & Mrs. Huninghake are very proud of the progress made and want to
discuss the reasons why some items remain and seek council guidance. They are also
very concerned about only one year contract extentions and would like to see if a longer
term is possible.
Enclosed for your use and review is a copy of the original contract with a listing of
remaining items, a proposed three year extension and listing of out of pocket repair
expenses for years 2000, 2001 and 2002.
ACTION REQUIRED
Determine whether or not Max Todo is in compliance with the existing contract and
consider a contract extension.
RECOMMENDATION
Not having seen the condition of the Cayuga prior, I can only guess as to the amount of
repairs accomplished, which seems substantial. If council agrees, and considering the
additional contract language regarding a new interstate bridge etc., I see no reason not to
grant a contract extension.
.
. .. ........ ''-'........'-'~ 1 L......I,\.N . 11"1 I 7' LHf',J', T HHN~t:.N
NO. 200 Glf1t3..
LEASF.A GREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT mad.e this 16th day of December, 1999, between the City of
Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota, a Home Rule City of the Third Class CCity") and
Max Todo, Marine Services, Inc., a Mim1esota corporation, with offices at 16355 - 18th Street
South, Lakeland, Minnesota 55082 ("Max Todo").
1. B.ecital The City is the 'Owner of real estate with frontage on the 81. Croix River
("Propercy"), part of which was formerly rented to Aiple Towing Company who operated a barge
tenninal facility from t11e site.
2. Tbe Property. A portion of tills Properly is the subject of tWs Lease and is
described on the attached Exhibh "A", the Property where c\lJTently a City owned barge entitled
the "Frank E" is moored along wjth a City owned vessel known as the "Cayuga", a vessel that is
held by the City for future use as park facility, but that currently is in need of substantial repair.
3. .Than. The City is willing to lease the site to Max Todo by this instrument for an
initial three (3) year period and two. (2) om:l-year extension peJiods on the consideration and
according to the terms set forth in thi.s Lease Agreement.
4. Rent. As and. for re11t payable to the City during the term of this Agreemenc, Max
Todo will perfonn repairs to the Cayuga according to the repair items list schedule attached to
this Agreement as Exhibit "B". TIle order and timing of the work will be detennined by Max
Todo but all work must be completed during the initial three (3) year term of this Agreement. As
additional rent, Max T odo will move the City barge from the Property to Lowell Park for the
Lwnberjack Days celebration and rel1lrn it to its mooring site on the Property at no charge to the
City. This provision will not prevent Max Todo fi.-om charging private parties for services
rendered to them beyond the actual mooring and spudding down of the barge. Max Todo will
also, at the end of the teml of this Agreement, move the Cayuga to its final location, without
charge to the City. Any USe of the barge by Max Todo or others will require prior approval of
the City Coordinator,
5. Allneara.~. Max Todo agrees to maintain the physical appearance of the
Property in its present condition and promises to erect no additional out. buildings or structures
onthe Property,
LOCATION:651 439 9464
RX TIME 09/20 '02 10:37
',.
.
.
.
1::l9/20/02
(;104
10:52
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM ~ LARRY HANSEN
NO. 200
~
. 6. Mooring. Max Todo will be allowed to bring to the Property and moor on the
Property a marine crane, tug boat, additional barges, material for the construction of new barges,
welding equipment and additional boats and vehicles as needed to reasonably maintain their
. business.
.
.
7. w..d.scaping, Max Todo will also plant sbmbs, annual and perennial flowers,
grade the access road, cut and trim bro\h and weeds, and maintain tbe Property in a presentable
fashion.
8. Lock Out Gate. Max Todo will construct lock out gates that will be installed to
secure the Property and prevent public access to the Cayuga, the barge and their business
property .
9. Waiver. Max Todo also agrees and waives by this Lease any claim that they
might otherwise have to compensation as a lessee in possession under any state or federal law or
rule should the property be needed to accommodate construction of an interstate bridge, bridge
piers or abutments or other possible bridge construction impacts in the event the Property or any
""" part of it is needed. for bridge construction or bridge construction impacts or is affected by bridge
construction impacts. Max. Todo upon ninety (90) days written notice by the City agrees to
accommodate any such construction or impacts. In that event the City agrees to reasonably
explore relocation of Max Todo for the remainder of the Lease period as long as a relocation
does not involve expense or charge to the City and the accommodation can reasonably be made.
If reasonable accommodations can not be ma.de without charge to the City, Max Tedo agrees to
vacate the Property leaving it in as good as condition as it is now found, waive any claim for
material or work done to the Cayuga, the barge or the premises and tllls Agreement will be null
and void. In that event, Max T odo will be relieved from further repairs to the barge Of Cayuga.
10. Moorin@" Visitnr~. Max Todo also agrees to reasonably accommodate, at the
request of the City, any marine services who are temporarily working on public projects on the
St. Croix River on a temporary basis and who are in need of loading, unloading or mooring
vessels involved in tins work. TIllS provision will be operative on a case by case basis and may
not unreasonably disrupt Max Todo'g operations, or provide a competitor with an unreasonable
advantage.
2
LOCATION:651 439 9464
RX TIME 09/20 '02 10:37
12:9/20/02
10:52
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM .~ LARRY HANSEN
NO. 200
GJ05
;.
11. Insurance. Max TodD must insure the Property against all risks and provide the .
City with a certificate of insurance evidencing $1,000,000 combined single limits coverage on
their operation, naming the City as an additional insured as their interest may appear. The City
will either self insure the Cayuga with regard to marine risks including hull risks or, if feasible,
as the Cayuga increases in value, secure marine insurance including hull coverage on the
Cayuga.
12. whibition Assignment. This Agreement and the rights granted hereunder may
not be assigned or transferred by Max. Todo without the prior written consent of the City,
13. Conditions! PrecedeTJi. This Agreement will not be effective unless all City
Charter provisions that pertain. to the use of City owned land have been followed and approved
by the City Council or the voters in the event that a referendum and also the approval of the
United States Army Corps of Engineers and tbe Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this 16th day of December,
1999.
CITY OF STILL \V A TER
.
By: A1:r.J:L//
. ~,'Ki;-(~~or
ATTEST:
i}lML/,~
Marti vfeldoll, Its City Clerk
MAX TODO,
MARINE SERVICES, INC.
By:
11_ {' 1Z'~<if!
Thomas F. HUIDngh e
President
Its:
By:
~~J
Its:
.
3
LOCATION:651 439 9464
RX TIME 09/20 '02 10:37
.
.
.
~r:::l/ .:::~/~.:::
1~::J~
MHbNUSoN LRW FIRM ~ LRRRY HRNSEN
~li6
ST A TE OF MINNESOTA )
) S5
COUNTY OF W ASI-IlNGTON )
NO. 200
The foregoi.ng instmment was acknowledged before me this 16th day of December, 1999,
by Jay L. Kimble, Mayor and Morli Weldon, Clerk, for the City of Stillwater.
e ~~~~~]
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
)
) 55
)
?/~ o!\f~A1~j)
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 16th day of December, 1999,
by Thomas F. Huninghake, the President, and Audrey J. Guild, the Secretary, duly authorized
-agents for Max Todo, Marine Services, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
'f. G~:-~~~~~~~~~'~r
.. \ . ..~HINGTON COUNTY j
~~'J~::'~_~~~~~lresJan,31,2000 .
c-~~_,_......
LOCATION:651 439 9464
.
-;;p~. di *'~ ~Jf_
Notary Public
4
RX TIME 09/20 '02 10:37
~._;..,~,.. ~
..;1 t _. C r fl... I ,;X...... ^ i y c; r
.~/
.-, .--- '-'--' ...
f.'-
IS>
~
.
.
is)
is)
f\J
o
Z
.1
.
....... .
z
w
(J)
z
cr
:r:
)- -""......
0:::
0:::
cr
-l
1-
E
0:::
~
l.L
3
cr
....J
Z
o
(J)
:J
Z
l!)
cr
E
. ....t
.__ J... [l'~ .\
~~
u_ __;_ . .j~
iV: J
... -.~:~- h~:-~.
. '7-..::. -.;.-. '.
j
, 'j''''''+-'
"J .~
/
\
.... I
.-.., '... ......
,
-~ ' .
.;..:...
.' I !
".:. -
f\J
If)
.. "
IS)
.-i
/,
-- '~
{
.. c/'11 .. f
....,I
"
I
:< 5"'0
'!
,
'\
.~.
f
t
t .
, fl' .'''~I ""4 .)
f\J
is) .
" . .".
is) . ,
f\J I '
"
01
;.)
r,- r-/",
"'#t
I
.
.
~1
~
CtlrU4f'1t
.._. .. .~, L _..,._._ ......
. "'=" _" 6> ... . #> ....
~..,.
~~
, - ---"""- ~r:
---.-"
,-....."
....,--. ::-:::.-
-------
-
. I ~...' ~--)
. "*.~~J lXl)(fXlXlXlXlX~_ -
~. ,.. 'lX~fXW>(W"" ..'
.. . -' ~ ,t':'
.' . ./
.. . ",.,~,,: ..
~"""., ~
--.----
>-
.
J
....
'"
cg
\,
. . .I
)
~
t'--
tV) .
o
..-l
C\J
o
o
.2 /t y~
h..r.,e. ...
~r
. I-'-
X
n:::
I.:
::.- -:- ~
------
'<t
(()
'<t
(})
(})
.~~
D-
........
I-'-
cr
U
D
..J
~':j/ .::~/~.::
1~::J~
MHbNU~UN LRW FIRM 7 LRRRY HRNSEN
NO. 200 [;103 ,
,. ,/ -.~".. ...
.;.
.
List of Reoair Items
1.) Repair and or replace broken windows. J'lI\ O~,...- G()\l~ ~h.elA~
14.) Repair holes in deck.
W;f Repair roof.
~ Lock for hatch cover.
.~) Intense inner hull and bilge cleaning. . . .'
\h) Removal of any remaining fuel and or lubricants.
~~) Reinforce Collision Bulk Head to be Wat.er tight.
8.) Aft Bulk Head to be raised 3' to 4' and reinforced.
9.) Shaft Bulk Head to be raised 3' to 4' and reinforced.
. v-H>.) Con lain current leaks and future leaks.
vii.) Emergency pwnps plumbed in and installed.
. 12.) Paint removal and new painl- ~ ~ . :W .
13.) Pennanent repair of Bow Tank. .'
v-l4.) Level A1ann System.
15.) Removal of any wmecessary pipes, wire~ tanks etc.
0'6.) Lock-Out Gate. 1
~
07.) Clean up grounds and plant flowers and shrubs for aesthetics.
.
LOCATION:651 439 9464
RX TI ME
09/20 '02 10:37
.If .f
:~ ....../ __ /2.
. ~
Max T odo, Marine Services Inc. .
11;41 AM
12/09/02 Transaction Detail By Account
AcauaI ..... January through [. ~ p '"-..,:. ...J 2000
Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance .
Cayuga
Credit Card Chaw 1/8/2000 090885 Menards Paint Suppli... Capitol One 35.10 35.10
Credit Card Cha... 1/9/2000 9855 Menards Painr supplies Capitol One 47.85 82.95
Check 1/17/2000 5155 Walmart Misc. Eastem.Heig... 57.31 140.26
Check 1/17/2000 5160 Menards Paint Eastem Heig... 40.92 181.18
Check 1/17/2000 5161 Menards Paint etc. Eastem Heig... 65.68 246.86
Credit Card Cha... 1/18/2000 67740 Menards Plywood Capitol One 146.15 393.01
Credit Card Cha... 1/26/2000 194 Absolute Air Clea... Zeolite Capitol One 17.95 410.96
Credit Card Cha... 1/27/2000 20385 Menards Paint supplies Capitol One 45.57 456.53
Credit Card Cha... 2/1/2000 9855 Menards Paint, bulbs Capitol One 17.84 474.37
Credit Card Cha.. 2/10/2000 2809 Walmart Paint Capitol One 23.21 497.58
Check 4/3/2000 5208 Yocum Oil Fuel for Cay... Eastem Heig... 150.00 647.58
Credit Card Cha... 4/19/2000 8949 Menards Cleaning Su... Capitol One 54.23 701.81
Check 10/10/2000 5538 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastem Heig... 542.45 1,244.26
Credit Card Cha... 12/8/2000 1506 Michaels Print Frames Capitol One 71.66 1,315.92
Credit Card Cha... 12/9/2000 1154 Farm and Home Home pipe Capitol One 18.56 1,334.48
Check 12/13/2000 5587 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastem Heig... 457.47 1,791.95
Check 12/13/2000 5588 Yocum Oil Pump For B... Eastern Heig... 205.00 1,996.95
Check 12/29/2000 5593 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastern Heig... 307.39 2,304.34
Total Cayuga 2,304.34 2,304.34
TOTAL 2,304.34 2,304.34
.
.
Page 1
11:11 AM
12/09/02
-.... Sam
. Type
Cayuga
Credit Card Cha...
Check
Check
Credit Card Cha...
Check
Check
Credit Card Cha...
Credit Card Cha...
Credit Card Credit
Credit Card Cha...
Credit Card Cha...
Total Cayuga
TOTAL
.
.
Max Todo, Marine Services Inc.
Transaction Detail By Account
January through [)ec:ember 2001
Date Num Name Memo Crr Split Amount Balance
1/4/2001 3129 Menards Float Switch Capitol One 52.99 52.99
2/9/2001 5613 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastern Heig... 437.66 490.65
2/27/2001 5619 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastern Heig... 358.24 848.89
3/29/2001 1390 Menards Pump Capitol One 108.40 957.29
6/11/2001 5665 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastern Heig... 602.75 1,560.04
11/13/2001 5911 Yocum Oil Fuel Eastern Heig... 268.86 1,828.90
12/2/2001 1127 Menards Door Capitol One 86.89 1,915.79
12/10/2001 5678 Menards Stack Capitol One 99.28 2,015.07
12/12/2001 1119 Menards Pump Capitol One -59.06 1,956.01
12/19/2001 3796 Menards Plumbing Capitol One 54.07 2,010.08
12/2712001 7896 Menards Pump Capitol One 27.68 2,037.76
2,037.76 2,037.76
2,037.76 2,037.76
Page 1
..
12:10 PM Max Todo, Marine Services Inc.
12/09/02 Transaction Detail By Account
-.... ..... January 1 through December 9. 2002
Type Date Num Name Memo Clr Split Amount Balance. .
Cayuga
Credit Card Cha... 3/8/2002 1234 Yocum Oil Cayuga Capitol One 459.04 459.04
Credit Card Cha... 4/14/2002 5567 Menards Pump Capitol One 159.40 618.44
Credit Card Cha... 6/6/2002 9101 Menards Pump Capitol One 47.88 666.32
Check 6/16/2002 6049 In91as Glass Door Eastern Heig... 235.00 901.32
Credit Card Cha... 9/2612002 0926 Menards Gloves Fleet 15.14 916.46
Credit Card Cha... 11/5/2002 1105 Menards Boiler Repairs Fleet 80.14 996.60
Check 11/14/2002 7063 Yocum Oil Fuel Oil Eastern Heig... 290.65 1,287.25
Credit Card Cha... 11/27/2002 1127 Menards Plywood Capitol One 144.20 1;431.45
Credit Card Cha... 11/29/2002 1129 Menards Bulbs/Broom Fleet 12.28 1,443.73
Credit Card Cha.., 121212002 1202 Menards Bulbs Fleet 21.27 1,465.00
Credit Card Cha... 1213/2002 1203 Menards Molding Fleet 92.29 1,557.29
Credit Card Credit 1213/2002 1203 Menards Molding Fleet -34.29 1,523.00
Credit Card Cha... 1214/2002 1204 Menards Molding Fleet 32.83 1,555.83
Credit Card Cha... 1214/2002 1204 Menards Molding Fleet 66.29 1,622.12
Credit Card Cha... 1215/2002 1205 Menards Building Mat... Capitol One 160.61 1,782.73
Credit Card Credit 1215/2002 1205 Menards Building Mat... Capitol One -80.82 1,701.91
Total Cayuga 1,701.91 1,701.91
TOTAL 1,701.91 1,701.91
.
.
Page 1
.-,
.,.
.
.'
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: City Administrator Hansen
SUBJECT: 2003 Lobbying
DATE: January 3,2003
Gentlemen:
Scheduled for the 4:30 workshop session is a discussion regarding the City of Stillwater
lobbying effort for 2003. As per council direction I have reduced the budgeted amount
for lobbying to the $35,000 level and have advised prospective lobbyist of this amount.
In addition I have done some shopping around and have proposals (see attached)
submitted from both Ed Cain, Legislative Associates, Inc. and Ted Thompson, Capital
Gains, Inc..
In discussing lobbying in general with my peers and Gary Carlson of League ofMN
Cities the common theme was that "Lobbying is a multi year effort and if we don't
continue projects may fall off the radar screen". As you would suspect there was also
common thought that "squeaky wheels do get greased."
My hope for the workshop session is to get council direction on how to proceed. Options
include selecting one of the two proposals or seeking more. Gary Carlson ofLMC has
provided me with the name and number of the Chief Lobbyist from Minneapolis who
could probably assist with development of a "Request for Proposals" process. He has
also suggested local law firms that specialize in lobbying.
-r
I
A Legis{ative Associates, Inc.
.:
..i__
.
.
P.O. Box 2.131
stillwaterj MN 55082.
(651) 439-7681
Fax (651)439-7319
IIOI 30tb Streetj Suite 500
WasbiJ1gtoJ1j D.c. 2.0007
(2.02.)62.5~4356
Fax (2.02.)62.5-4363
A Proposal for Government Relations Services for the
City of Stillwater in 2003
By: Legislative Associates, Inc.
Edwin E. Cain, President
Legislative Associates, Inc. (LAI) was established in 1992, by Ed Cain to provide
government relations and lobbying services for clients at the State and Federal levels of
government. In the ensuing 11 years, LAI work with Congress and the State Legislature
has resulted in appropriations of $60 million, authorizations of $175 million, and the passage
of nearly 100 legislative issues assisting clients.
The City of Stillwater contracted with LAI in 1992, to obtain funds to repair, extend
and expand the levy wall system to protect downtown Stillwater from the frequent flooding
experienced by the City. In 1985, the Corps of Engineers had ruled that the project did
not meet their costlbenefit criteria, and consequently, was not eligible for Federal support.
LAI was successful in overcoming the Corps Headquarters opposition to the
Jroject, and got the project authorized for construction in the 1992 Water Resources
)evelopment Act (WRDA) for $3.2 million. Subsequent work resulted in an appropriation
of $3.2 million in 1994, a reauthorization of the project for $11.6 million to expand and
extend the levee wall system, and three additional appropriations.
The City was required to contribute 25% of the total cost of the project, so LAI
worked with DNR and the State Legislature to xovide half of the required matching funds.
Cain was aware of the Federal government ru es that the City's share could be provided
through the contribution of land to construct the project, and increased the authorization to
permit most of the city's share to be paid in contributed land, thus saving local taxpayers
several million.
An article published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press stated regarding the City
contracting with LAI to assist them in obtaining funds to construct the new levee wall system,
"The then-mayor, Wally Abrahamson, dissented and contended the city was
wasting money - - - that the responsibility for lobbying for the City should be
with its congressman.
Now I've changed my mind, Abrahamson said. Hiring
Cain obviously was a wise move. It's hard to argue with success."
(1 )
Other flood control projects had been stalled for years. Based. on the success by .
LAI in Stillwater, the Corps St. Paul District Office told Houston, MN officials, "You better
hire Cain if you ever want to get this project funded." Their flood control had not been
funded after approval by the local Corps for 22 years. LAI was successful in obtaining $5
million in Federal funding, and additional funds from the State Legislature, MN DOT, and
DNR, for a total of $8 million. The project has now been completed.
A similar situation existed in Marshall, MN. Identified as a need in 1969, the City
was unable to get their flood control project funded. State Senator Arlene Lesewski
encouraged the City to contract with LAI. Again, LAI was successful in solving the
problems which had prevented Federal and State funding, and was successful in obtaining
$10 million for the City to complete the project in 2001.
The success of LAI for every client they have served has resulted in Cain being
know by Congress and.the Federal Agencies as "Minnesota's Flood Control Agent."
Other successful flood control project funding indudes Crookston, MN., a $25 million project,
and Granite Falls, MN., which will require $18 million to complete working with FEMA, the
Corps, and the State Legislature.
In addition to flood control projects, LAI has successfully obtained funds for cities with
other special needs. LAI successfully obtained $4 million in State funding for Kandiyohi
County for a massive sanitary sewer and water project circling Green Lake
The Village of Dayton, MN desperately needed a sanitary sewer and water project.
The construction. costs were so prohibitive that many of the citizens of modest means would
have been forced out of their homes. LAI got the City the necessary funding of $3.5 million
to complete the project.
.
LAI served as lobbyist for the MN Limousine Owners Association, writing and
securing passage of the Personal Transportation Act. This legislation was opposed by
Minneapolis and St. Paul, and the MN Department of Transportation.
LAI obtained funding for the construction of the first training center for fire fighters, law
enforcement officers, and EMS personnel at Marshall, MN. This center has now been
constructed, and is training several thousand professionals each year. The Marshall Center
provided the model for action by Senator Randy Kelly (now St. Paul Mayor), to introduce
legislation that establishes four more such training centers throughout the State.
For the City of Stillwater, LAI has worked on a number of issues over the past
10 years. LAI has twice gone to the Legislature to obtain the authority to grant new liquor
licenses for the City beyond the limitations set for cities of Stillwater size. LAI was
successful in both instances, obtaining the authority to grant three new liquor licenses by the
City. LAI also obtained four such licenses for the City of Marshall, MN in the 1990
Session.
In the 1990 Session, LAI obtained a significant change in the State Tax Code which
permitted the City to meet the requirements set forth in their annexation agreement with
Stillwater Township. This change saved the City considerable expenses and additional
work in the taxing of new residential homes. In two Sessions of the Legislature, bills were
introduced which would have blocked the construction of the new interstate bridge. In both
of these instances, these bills were discovered by LAI, strategy developed, contacts with
Legislators were made, and work carried out. Four bills were introduced and heard before
the appropriate committees. In all four cases, the bills were defeated. .
(2)
.
.
LAI has been assured by Representative Kennedy that funding for the new
Stillwater Armory will occur in the 2003 Session of Congress. Mankato received funding for
their armory when requested by their Republican Representative, Gil Gutknecht. Over the
past, Stillwater has been represented by a Member of Congress whose politics were not
with the Majority party. While this is a problem for some Congressmen, others, such as
Jim Oberstar, are highly respected by both parties, and works effectively on bipartisan
issues. The commitment by a City's Representative to Department of Defense funding is
the first criterion in obtaining National Guard construction funding. While Congressman
Kennedy meets this requirement, this has not been true in the past.
Successful LobbvinaReauisltes:
- -
· Every project Is unique. It is the responsibility of a good lobbyist to look for the
unique qualities of a project that sets it apart from others. The biggest concern of
Congressional and Legislative Members is that a commitment to funding your project
will open "Pandora's Box", and require them to consider a plethora of similar projects for
funding.
· Establish trust with Members and staff. This quality only comes with developing
a personal and human relations skills, being scrupulously honest, providing good
information, and making thern aware of any opposition or weaknesses in projects. Cain
has 30 years of experience working with Congress and the State Legislature. He has
the reputation of one of the most successful lobbyists in Minnesota and Washington,
D.C. according to the St. Paul Pioneer Press and the Minneapolis Star and Tribune
writers.
. A presence In Washington. Successfullobying can not take place behind a desk in
Minnesota. The legislative process is complex. An unanswered question at a hearing
often results in the project being killed. LAI has a Washington, D.C. office, and an
associate, Michael Valadez, who is an attorney with 25 years of Federal government
experience, who works with Cain on his biweekly trips to D.C.
· Know politics. Politicians must have three things to survive, - - - money, good
publicity, and a podium from which to speak. LAI provides all of these to the Members
of Congress and State Legislators. The credit for results always goes to the elected
official.
. Understand the policies, procedures, and practices of Congress, the
Legislature, and the Federal and State agencies. After completing his graduate
studies at the University of Texas, Cain was one of thirty post-doctoral students
selected nationally to study Federal/State Governmental Relations with the
Washington-based National Institute of Public Affairs. Cain has worked inState
agencies, Federal agencies, and served as Director of the Minnesota Washington, D.C.
Office for Governor AI Quie. Additionally, he was Vice President for Corporate Affairs
for Apache Corporation, directing legislative activities in Washington and 28 States
where Apache operated businesses.
· Do your homework. Know well, the project for which you are lobbying. Work closely
with City officials. the project engineers, the Corps of Engineers, and the community.
This is the practice of all LAI projects.
· Creative strategies. As problem solver, the effective lobbyist must be able through
. knowledge of the system develop creative strategies to overcome the opposition.
".
4. Reauthorization in WRDA. To include the "betterments" in the LeveelFlood Control
. Project will increase the total cost of the project requiring an increase in the authorization in
the WRDA Bill. These "betterments" are funded at 50% Federal funding, and will
permit Stillwater to double the $500,000 earmarked for the development of Lowell
Park. Further, it is highly likely that these funds can be doubled again by the State
resulting in a total of $2 million for the work on Lowell Park and the area near the levee
system.
5. State Funding for Matching Funds for Stage 3. The $750,000 appropriated by
the State for Stage 3 has expired, and will require a new appropriation for matching the
Federal grant. Otherwise the City will be responsible for the entire 25% matching funds
for Stage 3.
6. State Funding for Betterments. The State funding for betterments must be handing
very carefully and sequentially to maximize the results for the City. Properly done, the
City can expand the $500,000 to $3 million, and also eliminate most or all of the cash
matching funds required by the Federal legislation.
7. State Funding to Municipalities. The League of Cities will take the lead on this
effort. While the large cities will be active in this area, there is litUe individual smaller cities
can do on their own. A lobbyist can report on what's taking place, but can do very little.
S. Local Food, Drink, and Hotel Taxes. This is an effort that should have been done a
long time ago. Many cities in Minnesota have such a tax. As a major tourist attraction,
Stillwater would be fully justified, however, it must be carefully coordinated with the
Mayor and Council, and the community to be successful. A general sales tax will not
work.
9. Other Projects. There are other projects on the drawing board by the City, and
perhaps others from the Mayor and Council. I would be happy to discuss these with
you at your convenience.
.
LAI Proposal for the City of Stillwater Governmental Services:
LAI has been informed that the City has set aside $35,000 in their budget for
government relations services. Under those restrictions LAI would be able to provide high
quality, responsible lobbying services to fulfill the first four services presented on page (4)
of this document.
.
1. Stage 3 Funding of the LeveeJFlood Control Project.
2. Extended Funding for Stage 3.
3. Stillwater Armory Funding.
4. Reauthorization in WRDA.
Services listed as 5. and 6. are indelibly tied to the work in Washington, and will
benefit the City by several million dollars. LAI will work with the State Legislature and the
State Agencies on these issues for an additional $10,000. Transportation and hotel costs
have increased the past five years by 100%. LAI has ask for no increase in fees, and
absorbed these costs in the total contract. Frequent trips to Washington is critical to attend
hearings, bill markups, and to maintain the comradeship with the Minnesota delegation and
the Congressional leadership. Therefore it is necessary that a portion of these expenses
be added to these costs to the City. Any consultant that offers to conduct lobbying
services for the City that does not have frequent travels to the Capitol, will not provide the
services required.
(5)
LAI has a long and successful history supporting Stillwater projects in Washington,
D.C. and St. Paul. The projects worked on in 2002 will produce results early in the 2003 .
Session. The delay was the result of politics that far outweighed any individual local
projects before Congress. A new agent for the City at this time would receive credit for
work done by LAI, and even worst, could screw up the work already done.
I would be delighted to meet with the Mayor and Council to discuss this proposal.
Time is critical, however, and I strongly encourage action at the earliest possible date.
/ (..----.....,
t[1 I
....f /f ') /
/..~ ~~-
Edwin E. Cain ~Y00
.
.
.
.
.
Capito~
Gains,
Inc.
GOVERNMENT RELATIONS/PUBLIC AFFAIRS
GOVERNMENT RELATIONS PROPOSAL
Presented to:
From:
City of Stillwater
Ted Thompson, John Kaul
Capitol Gains Inc.
l)ecember12,2002
I)ate:
INTRODUCTION:
Government policies in the upcoming state legislative and congressional sessions will have
significant impacts on local units of government as budget deficits grow and state and
federal governments attempt to shift financial responsibility for government functions to
local and county level governments.
The budget situation both nationally and in the state make it tremendously important for a
city like Stillwater to be well-prepared and well-represented in order to defend the cities'
bottom-line and be opportunistic for what limited funding may be available. This is
particularly true for transportation funding.
Capitol Gains Inc. provides a full service team focused on results that encompass
government affairs, public relations, grassroots activity and media relations. Capitol Gains
principals have experience at the federal, state, local and agency levels and would pursue all
appropriate means to achieve results for the city of Stillwater. Success in the legislative
process is achieved through a multi-faceted approach in order to shape lawmakers' opinions
to be in sync with the needs of Stillwater and its residents.
To that end we are pleased to present this proposal to the city of Stillwater.
GOALS:
The three major initiatives highlighted for assistance include the proposed new Stillwater
Bridge, funding for the next phase of the Stillwater Levee project, and legislative or agency
action relating to a proposed new Annory. Other issues that may arise include support to
lift levy limits and impacting the local government aid formula. As you are aware, the state
of Minnesota is facing a $4.5 billion deficit and the federal government is also facing a large
deficit, therefore success will be achieved for those proposals that prove the greatest need -
that is the key element of an effective lobbying effort.
1
STILLWATER BRIDGE
Ongoing efforts by the city of Stillwater and others have kept this controversial
transportation project alive over the years. "With the recent announcement of the Stillwater
Bridge project being placed on a list of 'environmental streamlining' proposals coupled with
significant bi-partisan and bi-state support creates the environment in which Capitol Gains
would work with the city and other stakeholders to leverage the incremental movement into
an accepted plan for reconciling the required conservation fund monies with construction of
the new bridge.
.
Ted Thompson has over 9 years experience working in Congress including several years
working intimately on the Stillwater Bridge project, and Monie Anderson maintains solid
relationships with key individuals in Washington who could help move this project. If
necessary, Capitol Gains would panner with others in Washington to assure a multi-faceted
'push' to get this project approved and underway. Working through the myriad issues. of
transportation needs, environmental protection, and historic preservation at the state and
federal levels have always created a difficult situation for this project, as has the issue of
upgrading Highway 36. Achieving as much consensus as possible will be necessary therefore
community outreach and media relations will be critical. Working with other local
communities impacted by this project is also important in order to devise a 'win, win'
situation for Stillwater and its neighbors.
Minnesota and WiSconsin Members of Congress sit in key positions on critical committees
that can directly influence the bridge project. In the past several years the lack of leadership
at the state level has directly impacted Stillwater's ability to get final approval of the project. .
New administrations in Minnesota and "Wisconsin provide a tremendous opportunity for
each new governor to shine as they 'once and for all' settle this transportation issue.
STILLWATER LEVEE
Continuation of the levee project is critical to downtown Stillwater and to preservation of its
downtown. Stillwater has consistently taken required action to protect its city from the '100
year flood' that has been occurring every 4 to 5 years of late. Working with Minnesota's
congressional delegation and enlisting the assistance of the Pawlenty Administration and
local legislators to highlight the importance of this project are key elements to ensuring fair
consideration of funding for phase 3 of the project. Again, Capitol Gains' federal experience
and contacts with Democrats and Republicans along with a solid argument for why this is
needed will provide the basis for obtaining funding during these difficult budget times.
STILLWATER ARMORY
The long-time proposal for a new Armory in Stillwater represents a sound, new way of
thinking and one that should be a model for new armories throughout the country. The
proposal eases the burden on the federal government, provides it with a necessary new
facility, and serves the community at large. Capitol Gains will work with the delegation,
age?cies and the Bush Administration to enlist the necessary support to gain approval of this
project. .
2
.
.
.
STATE LEGISLATURE
Although much of the work envisioned centers on the federal government, Capitol Gains is
well equipped to effectively represent the city at the state legislature. At a minimum, Capitol
Gains would keep area legislators informed of activities and progress in Washington.
SUMMARY:
The five principals of Capitol Gains Inc. each bring strong elements to the team. The
careers of each Capitol Gains member have been results-oriented. Our relationships cross
party lines and exist at all levels of government and the media. An effective government
relations strategy must include not only traditional lobbying of elected officials, but
consensus building, grass roots activity and sound media relations in order to get the
community at large activated on behalf of Stillwater. The 'full service' nature of Capitol
Gains will leverage the work to date on Stillwater's issues.
SERVICES PROPOSED:
Capitol Gains will develop a specific, strategic plan for the key issues identified by the city of
Stillwater as top priorities. The plan will consist of the elements discussed generally above.
Capitol Gains will maintain contact with the City Administrator and the Mayor and Council
on the progress of our efforts as well as provide email, written, and verbal updates as
necessary or requested.
BUDGET PROPOSED:
Recognizing the constraints faced but the city, we are proposing a budget of between
$30,000 and $40,000. We also expect one to two trips to Washington, DC and we will do
everything possible to minimize the costs and combine trips with other clients in order to
further save the city money.
As discussed previously, should the government relations' services begin to consume
substantially more time and effort than initially budgeted, Capitol Gains would advise the
city administrator in order to detennine the best course of action and whether additional
compensation is in order.
We welcome the opportunity to submit a proposal to represent the city and its residents, and
ask that you contact John Kaul at 651-485-9199 or Ted Thompson at 651-983-5607 with any
questions or if you need additional information or detail.
3
"
:rf
.
CITY OF STillWATER
CITY COUNCil MEETING NO. 02-26
December 17,2002
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Mayor Kimble called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Absent:
Councilmembers Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
None
Others Present:
City Administrator Hansen
City Attorney Magnuson
Police Chief Dauffenbach
Fire Chief Kallestad
Public Works Director Eckles
Community Development Director Russell
City Clerk Ward
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to approve the
. December 3, 2002 regular minutes. All in favor.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
Tim Obr - St. Croix Vallev Athletic PartnershiD
Mr. Tim Obr of the St. Croix Valley Athletic Partnership reviewed the association's
accomplishments and requested that Council consider giving a contribution as has been
done in the past.
Councilmember Rheinberger asked if in the long term there would be expansion of this
facility.
Mr. Obr stated that they hope to open two more sites once the current facility is
complete. He stated that the locations would be in Stillwater and north of Stillwater.
Council member Milbrandt asked if there is information on how many participants come
from Stillwater, Hudson, etc.
Mr. Obr stated that he could get that information for Council, but that he has been told
that a majority of the participants come from Stillwater.
.
Councilmember Zoller asked if Afton, Marine on St. Croix, Stillwater, Stillwater
Township, and St. Mary's Point were the only municipalities that contributed.
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
Mr. Obr stated that was correct, however West Lakeland contributed by waiving the
building permit fees. He stated that Stillwater gave $27,000 a yearfor five years. .
Councilmember Bealka stated that the city has its priorities such as the St. Croix
Recreation Center, Lily Lake arena. He stated that what the association is doing is a
good thing, however economics are not good at this time.
Mayor Kimble stated that the 2003 budget has been set, however invited the St. Croix
Valley Athletic Partnership to request the money in the 2004 budget process that takes
place in June. He also stated that the association exceeded the expectations and
commended the association for their work.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Milbrandt directing staff
to include this request in the 2004 budget process. All in favor.
STAFF REPORTS
Community Development Director Russell provided an update -on the Lofts of Stillwater.
He stated that the developer has received the DTED grant and will begin the cleanup in
January.
Public Works Director Eckles provided an update on the Public Works facility and that a
Change Order with the $12,000 credit is on the consent agenda. He reminded Council
and the public of the Open House on January 18, 2003 from 11 :00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. .
CONSENT AGENDA
Motion by Council member Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to approve the
consent agenda without the Item - Possible approval of Pledge of Allegiance Dates for 2003
for discussion. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Resolution 2002-271, directing payment of bills
Resolution 2002-272, approving salary retainer for city attorney for year 2003
Resolution 2002-273, approval of agreements with Courier News and Stillwater Evening
Gazette for legal publications for 2003
Resolution 2002-274, designation of depositories for 2003
Resolution 2002-275, adopting Delinquent Sewer Charges Local Improvement No. 00001
Resolution 2002-276, approval of Change Order for Public Works facility
Request to purchase band saw for Public Works facility
Resolution 2002- 277, approving Minnesota Premises Permit for Gambling for St. Croix
Valley Athletic Partnership at St. Croix Saloon & Eatery, 112 N. Main Street, Stillwater,
MN
Resolution 2002-278, appointing additional election judges and fixing compensation for .
special election on January 28, 2003
Page 2 of 10
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
.
Request to renew of category list and anti-spam agent and software support for Web/Email
filtering software .
Request to purchase GIS software for Fire Department
Request to purchase printers for Fire and Public Works
Request to purchase computer for Inspections Department
Request to purchase software support for Veritas Backup Exec for City's Network
Resolution 2002-279, authorizing staff to complete application for conveyance of tax
forfeited parcel in Carli & Schulenberg's Addition
Resolution 2002-280, approval of agreement with Johnson Controls
Request to purchase a less lethal force option - Taser
Request to Carry over Capital Outlay Items - Building, Police, Civil Defense, Parking, MIS,
Plant/City Hall, Fire, Finance, Engineering and Library
Resolution 2002-281, approval of maintenance agreement with Johnson Radio
Communications Co. - Public Works
Consent Aaenda Item - Possible aooroval of Pledae of Alleaiance Dates for 2003
Councilmember Bealka stated that he felt that September 11 in remembrance of the
911 attacks and December 7 for Pearl Harbor Day be added to dates listed for the
Pledge of Allegiance.
Councilmember Rheinberger stated that the only traditional holidays should be
designated for the Pledge of Allegiance.
.
Councilmember Bealka stated that the County Board and other organizations say the
Pledge at every meeting.
Mayor Kimble stated that Veterans Day is the combination of days such as D-Day, VE
Day, VJ Day and the attack of Pearl Harbor. He also stated that for 2003 the Pledge of
Allegiance might be appropriate on the meeting preceding September 11, in
remembrance of the 911 attacks.
Motion by Council member Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to have the following
meeting dates for the recital of the Pledge of Allegiance for 2003. All in favor.
Memorial Day - second meeting in May (May 20)
Flag Day - first meeting in June (June 3)
Fourth of July - first meeting in July (July 1)
Observation of September 11 - first meeting in September (September 6)
Veterans Day - first meeting in November (November 4)
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
.
Mayor Kimble requested that New Business - Item No.3, Downtown Parking Program for
2003 be addressed at this time because Mr. Kevin LaCasse had another meeting to attend.
Page 3 of 10
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002.
Downtown Parkina Proaram for 2003
Community Development Director Russell stated that the Downtown Parking
Commission recommended that the City take over the management of the Downtown
Parking Program for 2003. He reviewed the history of the Downtown Parking Program
and Impark's responsibilities during their management of the program from 1995 to
2002.
.
Mr. Kevin LaCasse stated that the Downtown Parking Commission recommends the
Police Department assume the responsibilities of the Downtown Parking Program
City Administrator Hansen requested that money be available from the Downtown
Parking Program funds to preserve the option to contract with Impark for limited
services.
Police Chief Dauffenbach stated that his department might need Impark's expertise in
the accounting aspects and the machines used in the program. He felt that the
enforcement and staffing will work well, but there may be the need for limited services
from Impark.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, sE?conded by Councilmember Milbrandt authorizing
the preparation of the Notice of Termination by the City Attorney, preserving the option to
contract with Impark for limited services and instituting City's management of the Downtown
Parking Program for 2003. All in favor. .
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Case No. SUB/02-89. Reauest from 402 Main Street. LLC. for a subdivision of existina Joseoh
Wolf Brewerv Site located at 402 South Main Street in the CBD. Central Business District. into.
seven (7) lots and six (6) condominium units.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the request from 402 Main Street
LLCto resubdivide the old Gordon's Iron and Vittorio's properties into seven lots and six
condominiums. He stated the request is due to the new ownership and recent
development of the Gordon and Vittorios sites and that the owner has prepared an
overall plan for the site. He stated that the applicant has received separate design and
use permits that are required by the Central Business District Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Russell stated that the subdivision does not effect the physical development of the
site but does allow for separate ownership. He stated that the declaration of
easements, restrictions and covenants have been reviewed by the City Attorney and will
be recorded with the subdivision to allow shared use of common areas and provide for
maintenance and repair obligations. He also stated that the condominium subdivision
would be for residences above the first floor of the Main Street commercial uses.
Mr. Russell stated that the Planning Commission approved this subdivision at their ...
December 9th meeting with conditions of drainage and utility easements being provide~
Page 4 of 10
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
.
as required by the City Engineer and the spring water shall be directed to the storm
drain (I and I separation) before the final plat is recorded.
Councilmember Rheinberger stated that he didn't understand how this subdivision
would work.
Mr. Steve Bremer stated that the subdivision divides the space into the lots. Lot 1is the
front sidewalk area; Lot 3 is the restaurant on the ground level and above the restaurant
will be condominium units that will have individual ownership; Lot 2 is part of both lots;
Lot 4 is in the back with the parking lot and the driveway; Lot 7 is the corner of 2nd and
Nelson where the entrance to the condominiums will be and the entrance to Lot 5 where
the big red barn is which has a conditional use permit for a home; and Lot 6 is an
existing structure that will be remodeled into a home.
City Attorney Magnuson stated that he reviewed the documents and they were very well
done.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt
Resolution 2002-282, approving subdivision at 402 South Main and 207 East Nelson Streets.
All in favor.
-
Ayes: C.ouncilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, ZoHer and Mayor Kiml;>le
Nays: None
.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Peace Dole in Lowell Park
Community Development Director Russell stated that Council referred the issue of the
peace pole back to the Parks Board. He stated that the Parks Board reviewed the
request at their November 25 meeting and that the board did not see how the situation
had changed from their previous review and recommended that Council deny the
request.
Motion by Councilmember Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to accept the
Parks Board recommendation to deny the placement of a peace pole in Lowell Park. All in
favor.
2003 Budaet & Tax Levv
Mayor Kimble reviewed the proposed resolutions for the 2003 budget and tax levy.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by CouncilmemberZoller to adopt
Resolution 2002-283, adopting the final tax levy for the Year 2003 for $6,603,957. All in
favor.
. Ayes: Council member Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Page 5 of 10
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
--.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt .
Resolution 2002-284, adopting the final budget for the Year 2003, with revenues and
expenditures for $11,480,612.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
NEW BUSINESS
ADDointments to the Boards and Commissions
Gouncilmember Milbrandt requested that the Council consider each board/commission
separately because he felt that some of the commission appointments should be tabled
to the January 7, 2003 meeting.
Mayor Kimble reviewed the applicants for the Heritage Preservation Commission. He
stated that two terms expire and that Mr. Roger Tomten wishes reappointment, Ms.
Beth Diem is not reapplying and that a new applicant, Patte Kraske has requested
appointment.
Motionby.~Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Milbrandt to adopt
Resolution 2002-285, appointments to the Heritage Preservation Commission. All in favor.
.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Mayor Kimble reviewed the applicants for the Downtown Parking Commission. He
stated that three terms expire and two terms remain unfilled from January 1, 2002 and
that Mr. Kevin LaCasse and Peder Pederson wish to be reappointed to the commission.
He stated that if there are any members of the public interested in this commission to
contact City Hall.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Milbrandt to adopt
Resolution 2002-286, appointments to the Downtown Parking Commission. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to table the
appointments of the Human Rights Commission to the January 7,2003 meeting for additional
information. All in favor
Mayor Kimble reviewed the applicants for the Parks Board. He stated that two terms
expire and Linda Amrein and Sandy Snellman wish to be reappointed to the board.
Councilmember Milbrandt stated that another opening on the Parks Board would be
available once the Council representatives for the commissions/boards are decided.
Page 6 of 10
.
.
.
.
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to adopt
Resolution 2002-287, appointments to the Parks Board. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to table the
Planning Commission appointments to the January 7, 2003 meeting for additional information
and determine the applicants ward residency to try to get a balance of representation. All in
favor.
Community Development Director Russell suggested that a Certificate of Appreciation
be presented to Glenna Bealka for her service on the Planning Commission.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger directing staff to
prepare a Certificate of Appreciation for Glenna Bealka for presentation at the January 7, 2003
meeting. All in favor.
Councilmember Rheinberger stated that he wished the Library Board appointments
tabled until the January 7,2003 meeting. He stated that he felt there should be a
Council representative as one of the people on the board and should be.. discussed by
the new council.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to table the
Library Board appointments to the January 7, 2003 meeting. All in favor.
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to table the
appointments of the Joint Cable Commission to determine the Council representative. All in
favor.
Possible formation of task force reaardina the bridae issues - CouncilmemberSealka
Councilmember Bealka stated that he would be forming a blue ribbon task force to
explore and make recommendations regarding the bridge issue. He stated that this
task force will be independent from the City and is for Council's information and that no
action by Council is required.
Orderina of feasibilitv reDort for Phase II of Lilv Lake Water Qualitv imorovements
Public Works Director Eckles reviewed the history of the Lily Lake Water Quality
Improvements. He stated that work has taken place in two areas, the West Lake Street
Ravine and the Northwest Diversion. He stated that staff will be looking at constructing
portions of the additional phases that were presented in the original Short, Elliott and
Hendrickson report prepare in 1999. He also stated that the Bonestroo report included
the Olive Street Diversion that was constructed in the fall. He stated that proposed
funding for this phase would be through an area assessment of the southern drainage
Page 7 of 10
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
district of Lily Lake, Municipal State Aid and possibly another BWSR Grant. He
requested that Council authorize the preparation of afeasibility report for the Lily Lakee
Quality Improvement - Phase 2.
Councilmember Zoller asked if the water elevation of Brick Pond would be studied as
part of this feasibility report.
Public Works Director Eckles stated that issue could be addressed as part of the
feasibility report.
Councilmember Bealka asked where the water from Brick Pond goes.
Public Works Director Eckles stated that it goes into Lily Lake.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger to adopt
Resolution 2002-288, ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the Lily lake Water
Improvement - Phase 2 project. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
ADDroval to comDlete sewer line reDair~
Public Works Director Eckles stated that during the 2003 Street Improvement Project .
staff televised the sewer lines on Holcombe and Willard Streets and that staff
discovered that there were roots and protruding taps in the sewer line from poor
installation of sewer services which block the sewer main. He stated that these
obstructions prevented televising the whole sewer system and it makes it very risky to
attempt cleaning or jetting of the sewer lines because it could result in damage to City
equipment.
Mr. Eckles stated that a contractor should be hired to use special equipment and cutting
tools to the cut obstructions and protruding taps and remove them. He stated that there
is an immediate need to correct this problem. However the 2002 budget only allowed
$5,000 for sewer line repairs and that money has been spent. He requested that
Council authorize the use of Infratech to complete approximately $16,000 for sewer line
repairs and charge the cost to the sewer fund repairs.
Motion by Councilmember Milbrandt, seconded by Councilmember Rheinberger authorizing
the use of Infratech to complete approximately of $16,000 for sewer line repairs and charge
the cost to the sewer fund sewer line repairs. All in favor.
On-Sale and Sundav Liauor license transfer from St. Croix Preservation Comoany. Inc. DBA:
Lumber Barons to DBD Water Street Corooration. DBA: Water Street Inn .
City Clerk Ward reviewed the request for the on-sale and Sunday liquor license transf~
for the Lumber Barons Hotel. _
Page 8 of 10
.'
.
.
.
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17,2002
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt
Resolution 2002-289, approving transfer of On-sale and Sunday liquor license to DBD Water
Street Corporation, DBA: Water Street Inn. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Milbrandt, Rheinberger, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
Councilmember Bealka stated that he appeared before the County Board to bring their
attention to the serious traffic problem the City has on County Road 5. He stated it is
almost impossible to get onto County Road 5 from Pine Street during the morning and
evening and it is only a matter of time before something serious will happen in this area.
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
Police Chief Dauffenbach, on behalf of staff, thanked Councilmembers Bealka and
Zoller for their support during their terms on the Council.
Mayor Kimble reminded Councilmembers Bealka and Zoller that they still have to show
up at the January 7,2003 meeting to approve the minutes of this meeting and for a
small reception for outgoing and incoming Councilmembers.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Rheinberger, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adjourn the
meeting at 8: 18 p.m. All in favor.
Jay L. Kimble
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
Resolution 2002-271, directing payment of bills
Resolution 2002-272, approving salary retainer for city attorney for year 2003
Resolution 2002-273, approval of agreements with Courier News and Stillwater Evening
Gazette for legal publications for 2003
Resolution 2002-274, designation of depositories for 2003
Resolution 2002-275, adopting Delinquent Sewer Charges Local Improvement No. 00001
Page 9 of 10
"
City Council Minutes - 02-26
December 17, 2002
Resolution 2002-276, approval of Change Order for Public Works facility
Resolution 2002- 277, approving Minnesota Premises Permit for Gambling for St. Croix vall.
Athletic Partnership at St. Croix Saloon & Eatery, 112 N. Main Street, Stillwater, MN
Resolution 2002-278, appointing additional election judges and fixing compensation for
special election on January 28, 2003
Resolution 2002-279, authorizing staff to complete application for conveyance of tax forfeited
parcel in Carli & Schulenberg's Addition
Resolution 2002-280, approval of agreement with Johnson Controls
Resolution 2002-281, approval of maintenance agreement with Johnson Radio
Communications Co. - Public Works
Resolution 2002-282, approving subdivision at 402 South Main and 207 East Nelson Streets
Resolution 2002-283, adopting the final tax levy for the Year 2003
Resolution 2002-284, adopting the final budget for the Year 2003
Resolution 2002-285, appointments to the Heritage Preservation Commission
Resolution 2002-286, appointments to the Downtown Parking Commission
Resolution 2002-287, appointments to the Parks Board
Resolution 2002-288, ordering preparation of a feasibility report for the Lily lake Water
Improvement - Phase 2 project
Resolution 2002-289, approving transfer of On-sale and Sunday liquor license to DBD Water
Street Corporation, DBA: Water Street Inn
.
.
Page 10 of 10
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-9
.
COMMENDING COUNCILMEMBER TERRY ZOLLER
WHEREAS, Terry Zoller has served on the Stillwater City Council for over eight years;
and
WHEREAS, Terry Zoller is to be commended for his faithful and dedicated service to
the City of Stillwater.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF STILLWATER, that for his dedicated service to the City as Councilmember,
Terry Zoller be, and he is hereby commended; that recognition be given to the fact that
for the over eight years he has served the City, the said Terry Zoller provided exemplary
leadership. The Council further extends to him its best wishes for the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be, and she is hereby authorized
and directed to record this resolution in the official record of proceedings of the Council
and to deliver a certified copy thereofto the said Terry Zoller.
.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-10
COMMENDING COUNCILMEMBER GENE "TACO" BEALKA
WHEREAS, Gene "Taco" Bealka has served on the Stillwater City Council for eight
years; and
WHEREAS, Gene "Taco" Bealka is to be commended for his faithful and dedicated
service to the City of Stillwater.
NOW THERFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF STILL WATER, that for his dedicated service to the City as Councihnember, Gene
"Taco" Bealka be, and he is hereby commended; that recognition be given to the fact that
for the eight years he has served the City, the said Gene "Taco" Bealka provided
exemplary leadership. The Council further extends to him its best wishes for the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be, and she is hereby authorized
and directed to record this resolution in the official record of proceedings of the Council
and to deliver a certified copy thereof to the said Gene "Taco" Bealka.
Adopted by the Council this ih day of January, 2003.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
I
LIST OF BILLS
. EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
.
Ace Hardware
Advance Sportswear
American Payment Centers
American Reliable Insurance Co.
Ammonia House
Ancom Technical Center
Aspen Publishers
AT&T Broadband
Board of Water Commissioners
Buberl, Larry L.
Capital City Mutual Aid Assoc.
Cardinal Tracking, Inc.
Carquest
Century College
Coca Cola
Cole Paper
Cub Foods
Dauffenbach, Charlotte
Dell Computer
Emergency Apparatus
Express Photo
Fire Engineering
Fire Marhsal's Association of MN
Fire Marshals Association of MN
First Line
G & K Services
Grainger
Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce
Greeder Electric
Heartland Automotive Services
Holiday
Ice Skating Institute
Ikon Office Solutions
International Institute of Municipal Clerks
Johnson Controls
Johnson Radio Communications
Kath Companies
Knauss, Chantell
Labor Relations Association
Lakeview Hospital
League of MN Cities
Lee Wayne Corporation
Legislative Associates, Inc.
Lind, Gladys
LG Schuster
McLeod USA
Menards
Met Life Dental
.
Hardware
Uniforms Fire & Rec Center
Payment Box Rental Cub
Flood Insurance
Top End Kit for Compressor #2
Repair MIC Sticks
Govt!. GAAP Guide
Cable
Utility Payments
Animal Transport
2003 Capitol City Memberhsip Dues
Paper Supplies
Equipment Repair Supplies
Law Enforcement Training
Concession Supplies
Auto Scrubber, Cleaning Supplies
Concession Supplies, Coffee Supplies
Sewed on Patches
Inspections Computer
Equipment Repair
Processing
Subscription Renewal
Dues
Fire Safety Seminars
Concession Supplies
Logo Mats
Band Saw,Blade,Oil & Wet Kit
Annual Membership Dues
Repair Lift, Dome Breaker
Vehicle Maintenance
Fuel
Exhibition Endorsement
Maintenance Agreement
Annual Membership Dues
2003 Maintenance Agreement
Speaker System Public Works Facility
AFB Premix, Purple Solvent
Mileage Reimbursement
Firefighter's Contract Mediation
Legal Blood Draws
2003 Leadership Conference Council
Key Tags
Legislative Services December 2002
Land Purchase
W-2's & 1099 Forms
Telephone
Supplies
Dental Insurance
90.86
2,689.00
78.00
5,746.00
1,094.35
137.87
151.16
59.78
50.60
50.00
50.00
52.00
2,528.96
1,185.00
2,243.50
6,789.73
171.72
68.00
1,682.34
255.15
44.70
24.95
35.00
90.00
894.40
532.50
1,618.63
625.00
1,655.50
44.11
4,450.08
5Q.00
381 .15
120.00
6,815.00
4,673.30
1,207.76
41.61
798.00
40.00
480.00
36.74
4,975.00
927.00
341.71
595.32
329.08
14959
EXHIBIT" An TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
Metropolitan Emergency Mgr Assoc.
Mid States Organized Crime Info Center
Minnesota's Bookstore
MN Chiefs of Police Association
MN Dept of Admin Intertechnologies
MN Dept of Labor & Industry
MN Dept of Public Safety,Criminal Apprehen
MN Fire Service Certification Board
MN Government Finance Officers Assoc.
MN Housing Partnership
MN Ice Arena Manger's Association
MN State Fire Chiefs' Association
MN State Fire Department Assoc.
Moore, Tim
MPELRA
Municipals
National Fire Codes
Neopost
New Horizons
Nextel
Northland Chemical Corp.
Northwestern Tire Company
Oshkosh Capital
Pameco
PC Pit Stop
PC Solutions, Inc.
Plan Sight
Pump and Meter Service
Quill
R & R Specialties
River Valley. Printing
St. Croix Office
St. Croix Scuba
Science Museum
Shorty
Smith, Ryan
Springbrook Software
Sprint
State of MN, Minnesota Bookstore
Stillwater Ford
Stillwater Gazette
Sysco
Tomten Environmental Design
Tower Asphalt
TR Computer Sales, LLC
Treadway Graphics
Turning Point
University of MN.
U.S. Bank
Page 2
2003 Membership
Membership
Liquor Laws & Rules
Membership, Seminar
November Usage 2002
Exemption Invoice, License
Seminar
Written Promotional Exams
Dues
Seminar
2003 Arena Membership
Dues
Fire Service Day
Reimburse Engineering Supplies,Mileage
Conference, Dues
2003 Membership
Subscription Renewal, Membership
Equipment Maintenance
Training Coupons 2002
Cell Phones
Cleaning Supplies
Tires
2002 Pierce Dash 105' HDL Payment
Filters for Refridgeration System
Modem
Maintenance Agreement
Arc View Software
Program Gas Pump PW Facility
Office Supplies
Ice Blade Grind
Office Supplies
Office Supplies
Wrist Seal Replacements
Seminar
Laundry
Reimburse Erosion Control Training
Annual Maintenance
Cell Phones
2002 MN Statutes
Vehicle Maintenance
Publications
Concession Supplies
Professional Services, Liberty, Bahr
UPM Winter Mix
Software License & Support Fees
DARE Supplies
Business Envelopes
City Engineers Conference,BldgOfficial
Custody Charges Levee Wall Project
^
.,
.
30.00
150.00
15.92
430.00
140.83
75.00
120.00
400.00
40.00
20.00
100.00
140.00
160.00
144.58
270.00
20.00
715.50
627.00
700.00
273.09
184.03
1,271.52
234,196.82
373.22
37.22
173.00
1,298.00
995.00
99.21
51.50
217.26
224.43
94.95
323.00
38.34
95.00
10,425.00
42.75
213.00
905.03
169.29
528.42
150.00
222.69
1,007.94
272.40
971.81
850.00
221.00 .
.
.
EXHIBIT n An TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01 Page 3
.
Valley Trophy Council Nameplates 13.89
Verizon Cell Phones 455.19
Vetsch, Sandra Uniform Reimbursement 169.95
Viking Sprinkler Repair Sprinkler System 1,074.24
Vogel Sheetmetal Fresh Air Damper 260.00
Walmart Supplies 79.45
Waste Management 2nd Payment 2002 Certification 15,729.89
Wells Fargo Paying Agent Fees 1,212.50
Wells, Travis Theodore Tobacco Compliance Checks 36.00
Yocum Oil Repair Furnace, Heating Fuel 437.04
Zell Plumbing Service Call, Repair Leak 88.00
MANUAL CHECKS DECEMBER 2002
McLeod USA Telephone 636.37
Michigan State Police Check Liquor License Application 5.00
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
. Ace Hardware Hardware 64.95
Action Rental Mini Storage Unit 810.00
Alex N. Sill Company Prison Fire 20,000.00
American Public Works Assoc. Historic Photos 135.00
Applied Images Nameplates 14.15
APWA Coloring Books, Stickers Public Works 245.00
Association of Training Officers of MN Membership 25.00
AT & T Broadband Cable 11.79
AT & T Wireless Cell Phones 257.05
Board of Water Commissioners 4th Quarter WAC 81,675.00
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Assoc. Olive St. Diversion, McKusick Ravine 3,400.50
Catco Equipment Repair Supplies 336.00
C & H Distributors Inc. Computer Work Center 946.28
DARE America Merchandise DARE Supplies 68.92
Ecolab Pest Control 241.76
Erickson, Ron Boot Brush, Convertible Hand Truck 155.23
Exemplar Drug Tests 81.00
Fred's Tire Tire Repair 17.25
Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates Surveying Services McKusick Ravine 1,216.50
Goodwill Easter Seals December ADC Expenses 337.00
Hotsy Equipment Carbonate Plus 585.75
IFP Test Services, Inc. Psychological Exam 495.00
Integra Telecom Telephone 1,754.94
Jansens Cleaning Service Maintenance Agreement 325.00
. Johnson Radio Communications Maintenance Contract 1,048.20
Kraus, Deborah Attorney Fees Dangerous Dog 375.00
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
LMC
LMC Berkley Risk
Magnuson Law Firm
McCollister & Company
Met Council
Metropolitan Emergency Mgr. Assoc.
Mid City Mechanical Corp.
Minn Blue Digital Imaging
MN Association of Urban Mgmt. Assistants
MJMA Inc.
NCITE
Parts Associates
Paul, Chris
Peltier, Jennifer
Pod's Tire
Public Safety Equipment
Qwest
Riccar Corporation
Regions Hospital EMS
Roberts Company, Inc.
St. Croix Tree Service
SA LA
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
S & T Office
Stillwater Courier
Stillwater Motors
Stork
Uniforms Unlimited
United Building Centers
Washington County Government Center
Xcel
Zoller, Rob
Adopted by the City Council this
7th Day of January, 2003
2003 State of Cities Legislative Conf.
Insurance
Professional Services
Bulk Oil
December SAC 2002
Membership
Air Compressor & Piping
20 # Bond
Membership
Shelving Public Works Facility
Seminar
Supplies Public Works Facility
Reimbursement Work Boots
Reimbursement Notary Public Fee
Tire Repair
Calibration Radar Units
Telephone
Refund Overpayment Permit
Seminar
Name Bars
Pruned Broken Branch
Public Works Facility
Liberty Commercial Area
Office Supplies Public Works
Publication
Vehicle Repair Supplies
Soil Analysis Public Works Facility
Tasers
Bui/ding Supplies
Quick Access Licensing
Electricity, Gas
Reimburse Meal Expenses
Page 4
.
130.00
500.00
2,693.33
3,580.98
29,700.00
30.00
6,963.00
65.33
30.00
1,912.17
50.00
1,192,62
44.99
25.00
221.42
365.00
219.01
25.50
240.00
30.35
74.55
61.68
315.76
15,666.88
119.26
19.16
65.00
4,304.48
196.54
900.00
33,395.38
110.30
.
Total 555,441.38
.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
tfEPARTMENT: Plant/City Hall DA TE: January 7, 2003
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is):
Request approval to purchase a floor burnisher.
Cost: $2,151.30
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
ee proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
This item was approved in the 2003 budget.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ATTACHED:
YES
NO
bC
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBMITTED BY ~ If//~ DATE: January 7, 2003
Chanlell Knauss, Director of Administration
.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
.;
DEPARTMENT: MIS
. DATE: January 7, 2003
.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is):
Purchase of 2 technical and 10 non-technical computer training coupons for City Staff.
Cost: $3,700
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
This training was included and approved with the 2003 budget.
.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ATTACHED:
YES
NO
x
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBMITTED BY ~.......H &- DATE: January 7,2003
Rose Holman, MIS 2gecialist
.
.
Memorandmn
To: Mayor Kimble and City Council Members
cc: Larry Hansen
From: Larry Dauffenbach, Police Chief
Date: 1/7/2003
Re: 2003 Squad Car Purchase
.
I would like to order two new police squad cars. They would be Ford Crown
Victoria police package units ordered from the state bid. Superior Ford again has
the state bid. There is a 90 to 120 day delivery wait for the vehicles. The cars are no
longer available in Wedgwood Blue, the color of the cars for the last 10 years or so.
We are taking this opportunity to look at new squad car colors and new graphics.
The cost is $22,470.00 per unit. This does not include switch over of equipment,
deliveryfees, service contracts or any additional equipment. There is money in the
capitol outlay budget for two new police squad cars.
Recommend approval to purchase two new Ford Crown Victoria police squad cars
from state bid.
1
SUpEFtIOR FO~D
FLEET Be GOVERNMENT SALES
9700 56TH AVE NO
PLYMOUTH, MN 55442
E-MAIt.
c-hendr2@dealeremall.com
BILL STUART
763.519-6349
WANDA MAHAFFEY
763-519-6373
FAX
763-5 I 9-6336
CAROL HENDRICKSON
763-519-6351
FAX TO:
L/fl2/2.q O-'7V, -; ~'::N c? /.1:0/
#OFPAGES
.;;z
TO:
S;7~c- C(/-"9-."-~ r:'.4
//7/0.3
DATE
PHONE &57 - 35/'- ~9tJk.
FAX ~51 ~ fJS/-~ r./O
2003 FORD CROWN VICTORIA POLICE INTERCEPTOR
POLICE INTERCEPTOR PACKAGE
4.6L va ENGINE / AOD TRANSMISSION
POWER LOCKS. WINDOWS. MIRRORS
BUCKET SEAT FRONT - CLOTH FRONT & REAR I 5" HEADER UGI-JT
SPEED CONTROL / TILT STEERING WHEEL I MAP LIGHT
AIR CONDITIONING / AM/FM STEREO RADIO / 5M HUB CAPS
REAR WINDOW DEFROSTER / ENGINE BLOCK HEATER
ASS BRAKES / UMITED SUP REAR AXLE
NOISE SUPPRESSION / FR Be RR FLOOR MATS
POWER DISTR1BlmON BOX (POB) REPL6.CESAUX FUSE BLOCK
POWER DRIVER SEAT INCLUDES SIDEA1R BAGS
LH SPOTLIGHT
t:.A II:.RIOR COLORS:
au MED BROWN MET
MT MATADOR RED
FS SPRUCE GREEN
DX DARK PEARL BLUE
LK DARKBLUE
LM ROYAL BLUE
LN LIGHT BLUE RADIO
MM ULTRA BLUE CC MET
LS .LTICEBLUECCMET
P5 ASPEN GREEN ce MEr
TN SILVER GREY MET
$ 20877.00 ~ERFROST
TAX & Lie NOT INCLUDED A BLACK .......
WHITE../'
YG ME.U IlrANIUM
TM LIGHT GREY
AQ ARIZONA BEIGE
IMPORTANTI - To RECEIVE THIS GOV'T PRICING YOU MUST HAVE A FORD
FLEE:T 1D# IF YOUR AGENCY DOES NOT HAVE ONE - CALL
1-800-343-5338
PAYMENT 19 DUE UPON DEUVERYOF EACH UNrT
INTERIOR COLORS:
0;~~ARC~
LI t-LINI
TAN
FOR DELNERY - ADD .75 PER MILE ONE WAY
DELIVERY MUST BE TAKEN WITHIN I WEEK OF RECEIPT" AT SUPERIOR FORO
INSURANCE CO
POUCY#
$ 20877.00
TOTALOF OPTIONS FROM FiAGE 2.............................................................
159.3,er{)
$ c2d'/7tJ, tJO E.-9-
TOTAL PRICE OF EACH VEHICLE
TOTAL PRICE OF ALL MANUALS ORDERED..................---..............................
THANK YOU FOR THE BUSINESS, PLEASE CALL rFANY QUE5T10NS.
. TAX & UC NOT INCL
~Cd.JI j
--
SUPERIOR FORD, INC.
JAN-07-2003 12:47
7635196336
96Y.
.- - -
~.
.
.
.
p.m
....Jf1l1 U{ L.UU....,J ..1'-..1.'-
.
PG 2 CROWN VIC POUCE Il\Il ~rcC~r- I OR 0P110NS
COST
$ 60
185
150
(89)
235
(20)
40
(t61)
161
90
70
642 0
o
15
279
o
.
1. VlNYLREARSEAT IWOKCHARCOAL 12-l.TFUNT IJ+TAN
2. AM/FM '=' I ~rcEO (:k,::.~ lit:. 58H
3. TRUNK ORGANIZER 13c (OLD 5T)'l.E)
4. RUBBER FLOOR ()N UEU OF CARPET at F1..QOR MATS)
5. SIDE AIR BAGS - 0P110NAL W/MANUAL SEATS 59M
6. DELETE ENGINE BLOCK HEAl ~K 41 H
7. MULTIPU;:UNITS-KEYEDAUKE /d-9Vi( ~5"
8. DELETE lJ-I SPQ1UGHr
9. ADDRHSPOTUGHr S1Y
10. CLOTH SPUT BENCH SEAT (IN UEU OF BUCN:.I;::,) P
1 1. ADDmONAL ROOF REINFORCEMENT 185
1 2. FULL WHEEL COVERS UN UEU OF SMALL CENTER HUB CAPs)
13. DELEI"E 5" ROUND HEADER UGHT 64M
14. COUrcl,d;'{ LAMPS DISABLED 478
15. SIUCONE HOSES W/ AIRCRAFT CLAMPS 177
16. TRUNK RELEASE ON DRIVERS DOOR 61 H
(IGNmON POWErc:l:.&J)
17. DELETE ::.r-r=.~LI CONTROL
18. DELtTE RADIO NOISE SUPPRESSION
19. POWER ADJUSTABLE BRAKE & GAS PEDALS 5ge
20. LOCKS-DRIVER Be FR PASS CONTROL ONl..Y 1 57
21 . WlNDOW&DRIVER & FR PASS CONTROl.. ONLY 948
22. TWOTONE PAINT-ACCENT ON ROOF & 4 DOORS 952
23. iWOTONE PAINT-ACCENT ON ROOF,HOOD.TRUNK 953
24. TWOTONE PAINT-ACCENT ON ROOF & FR DOORS 954
25. BASE POUCE PREP PKG - 65A
Nv II:.. DE1..ETE5 FRONT POWER DISTRIBt1110N BOX WIRING
26. POUCE PREP PKG - COMPL.l:.1 ~ 68P
NOTE: DELETES FRONT POWER DISTRIBUTION BOX WIRING
27. VISIBIUTY GRP -REQUIRES COMPLE:T'E POUCE ,..1'\1:.... PKG 65#
28. PLASJ1C TRIM RINGS -Ar 1 "'1'\~KEl"NOT INSTAl I ro"l")
29. FR DOOR MLDGS INSTALLED BY FACTORY 96c
(t 85)
(55)
120
o
18
450
450
450
708
1595
995
50
o
30. POWERTRAlN WARRANTY - 3YR/ 1 00,000 MI... 1800
3 t. POVvl:.rtl rcAlN WARRANTY- 3 YR/75,OOOMI... 1300
...$60 DEDUCTIBLE PER VISIT - WARRANTY ENDS
AT WHICHEVER COMES FIRsr - Mll..ES OR TIME
32. DEUVERY .75 PER MlLEONEWAY $.75X MILES =
L/GUTe pOc.VGJZ~WI&/o.e. .l"hq 6.t96-S
TOTAL OF AU. OPllONS ADuc..u TO ORDER................................. $
33. SERVICE MANUAL
304. POVvc..n J rtA1N/EM1S510N MANUAL
35. ELE'-* 1 n:ICAL MANUAL
36. PAn I::' MANUAL
QTY
qry
Q'TY
QTY
. $ 145
200
65
95
.
TOTAL OF ALL MANUALS
JAN-07-2003 12:47
7635196336
96~
OPTIONS
WM 1 CJ.J
$ ~O
~()
7()
-6r
/0
--
'-'
-&-
/a
4?70
.-e-
/3 or)
C36i)
/593
$
P.02
.
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
.
Ace Hardware
Advance Sportswear
American Payment Centers
American Reliable Insurance Co.
Ammonia House
Ancom Technical Center
Aspen Publishers
AT&T Broadband
Board of Water Commissioners
Buberl, Larry L.
Capital City Mutual Aid Assoc.
Cardinanracking, Inc.
Carquest
Century College
Coca Cola
Cole Paper
Cub Foods
Dauffenbach, Charlotte
Dell Computer
Emergency Apparatus
Express Photo
Fire Engineering
Fire Marhsal's Association of MN
Fire Marshals Association of MN
First Line
G & K Services
Grainger
Greater Stillwater Chamber of Commerce
Greeder Electric
Heartland Automotive Services
Holiday
Ice Skating Institute
Ikon Office Solutions
International Institute of Municipal Clerks
Johnson Controls
Johnson Radio Communications
Kath Companies
Knauss, Chantell
Labor Relations Association
Lakeview Hospital
League of MN Cities
Lee Wayne Corporation
Legislative Associates, Inc.
Lind, Gladys
LG Schuster
McLeod USA
Metropolitan Emergency Mgr Assoc.
Mid States Organized Crime Info Center
.
Hardware
Uniforms Fire & Rec Center
Payment Box Rental Cub
Flood Insurance
Top End Kit for Compressor #2
Repair MIC Sticks
Govtl. GMP Guide
Cable
Utility Payments
Animal Transport
2003 Capitol City Memberhsip Dues
Paper Supplies
Equipment Repair Supplies
Law Enforcement Training
Concession Supplies
Auto Scrubber, Cleaning Supplies
Concession Supplies, Coffee Supplies
Sewed on Patches
Inspections Computer
Equipment Repair
Processing
Subscription Renewal
Dues
Fire Safety Seminars
Concession Supplies
Logo Mats
Band Saw,Blade,Oil & Wet Kit
Annual Membership Dues
Repair Lift, Dome Breaker
Vehicle Maintenance
Fuel
Exhibition Endorsement
Maintenance Agreement
Annual Membership Dues
2003 Maintenance Agreement
Speaker System Public Works Facility
AFB Premix, Purple Solvent
Mileage Reimbursement
Firefighter's Contract Mediation
Legal Blood Draws
2003 Leadership Conference Council
Key Tags
Legislative Services December 2002
Land Purchase
W-2's & 1099 Forms
Telephone
2003 Membership
Membership
90.86
2,689.00
78.00
5,746.00
1,094.35
137 ;87
151.16
59.78
50.60
50.00
50.00
52.00
1,226.51
1,185.00
2,243.50
6,789.73
134.76
68.00
1,682.34
255.15
44.70
24.95
35.00
90.00
894.40
532.50
1,618.63
625.00
422.50
44.11
2,437.28
50.00
381 .15
120.00
6,815.00
4,673.30
1,063.67
41.61
798.00
40.00
480.00
36.74
4,975.00
927.00
341 .71
595.32
30.00
150.00
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
Minnesota's Bookstore
MN Chiefs of Police Association
MN Dept of Labor & Industry
Menards
Met Life Dental
MN Dept of Admin Intertechnologies
MN Dept of Public Safety,Criminal Apprehen
MN Fire Service Certification Board
MN Government Finance Officers Assoc.
MN Housing Partnership
MN Ice Arena Manger's Association
MN State Fire Chiefs' Association
MN State Fire Department Assoc.
Moore, Tim
MPELRA
Municipals
National Fire Codes
Neopost
New Horizons
Nextel
Northland Chemical Corp.
Northwestern Tire Company
Oshkosh Capital
Pameco
PC Pit Stop
PC Solutions, Inc.
Plan Sight
Pump and Meter Service -
Quill
R & R Specialties
River Valley Printing
St. Croix Office
St. Croix Scuba
Science Museum
Shorty
Smith, Ryan
Springbrook Software
Sprint
State of MN, Minnesota Bookstore
Stillwater Ford
Stillwater Gazette
Sysco
Tomten Environmental Design
Tower Asphalt
TR Computer Sales, LLC
Treadway Graphics
Turning Point
University of MN.
U.S. Bank
Page 2
Liquor Laws & Rules
Membership, Seminar
Exemption Invoice, License
Supplies
Dental Insurance
November Usage 2002
Seminar
Written Promotional. Exams
Dues
Seminar
2003 Arena Membership
Dues
Fire Service Day
Reimburse Engineering Supplies,Mileage
Conference, Dues
2003 Membership
Subscription Renewal, Membership
Equipment Maintenance
Training Coupons 2002
Cell Phones
Cleaning Supplies
Tires
2002 Pierce Dash 105' HDL Payment
Filters for Refridgeration System
Modem
Maintenance Agreement
Arc View Software
Program Gas Pump PW Facility
Office Supplies
Ice Blade Grind
Office Supplies
Office Supplies
Wrist Seal Replacements
Seminar
Laundry
Reimburse Erosion Control Training
Annual Maintenance
Cell Phones
2002 MN Statutes
Vehicle Maintenance
Publications
Concession Supplies
Professional Services, Liberty, Bahr
UPM Winter Mix
Software License & Support Fees
DARE Supplies
Business Envelopes
City Engineers Conference,Bldg Official
Custody Charges Levee Wall Project
.
15.92
430.00
75.00
177.85
149.59
140.83
120.00
400.00
40.00
10.00
100.00
140.00
160.00
144.58
270.00
20.00
715.50
627.00
700.00
273.09
184.03
195.04
234,196.82
373.22
37.22
173.00
1,298.00
995.00
17.13
51.50
217.26
224.43
94.95
323.00
38.34
95.00
10,425.00
42.75
213.00
905.03
84.63
528.42
150.00
222.69
1,007.94
239.38
971.81
850.00
221.00
.
.
c'
./
.
.
.
EXHIBIT" A" TO RESOLUTION #2003- 01
Valley Trophy
Verizon
Vetsch, Sandra
Viking Sprinkler
Vogel Sheetmetal
Walmart
Waste Management
Wells Fargo
Wells, Travis Theodore
Yocum Oil
Zell Plumbing
Adopted by the City Council this
7th Day of January, 2003
Council Nameplates
Cell Phones
Uniform Reimbursement
Repair Sprinkler System
Fresh Air Damper
Supplies
2nd Payment 2002 Certification
Paying Agent Fees
Tobacco Compliance Checks
Repair Furnace, Heating Fuel
Service Call, Repair Leak
Page 3
13.89
455.19
169.95
1,074.24
260.00
79.45
15,729.89
1,212.50
36.00
437.04
88.00
,
.
MEMORANDUM
December 30, 2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Larry Hansen, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Abatement of Assessments for Parcel 34.030.20.23.0089
DISCUSSION:
An application has been received to abate the assessment for Waterboard
Water Service Install, L.1. 357 that was placed against the property in error.
RECOMMENDATION:
.
Council consider abating assessments against the tax forfeited parcel.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion
adopting Resolution 2003-02, RESOLUTION ABATING ASSESSMENT FOR
PARCEL NO. 34.030.20.23.0089
.
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY - ASSESSMENT DIVISION
\i
.,
Fonn4 Revised 3/2000
W orksheet#
APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT - GENERAL FORM (M.S. 375.192)
CLASSIFICA TION I DISASTER CREDIT I SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
For property assessed (year) 2002
County of:
WASHINGTON
and payable in (year) 2003
Applicant's Name
Mark R Oftedahl
Please print or type
jApplicant's Mailing Address
1024 5th Avenue South
Stillwater. ~~ 55082
Applicant's Social Security Nwnber
Telephone (work) (
Telephone (home) ( f) S 1
439,-8812
Street Address (if different from above)
Property ID Number 34.030.20.23.0089
Legal Description of PrQperty
Description of Property
MP Number
School District # City or Township Name
District #
0834 City of Stillwater
S 10 Ft of Lot 5, All of Lots 6 & 7, Block 15 Hersey Staples & Co's Addition
7601
Assessor's Estimated Market Value
Land $ SO. 000
Applicant's Statement of Facts:
An assessment (Ll 357) was placed against this property In error.
Structure $ 84 0 220
Total $ 134,200
Class 201-1-000
i~ Applicant's Request:
r Remove the assessment 6203570 for $2,200.00 plus interest.
i~Please issue a new Tax Statement for payable 2003 with the assessment deleted.
APPlicant'sSignature:N~ ~ City Administrator Date: January 7, 2003
Note: l'..1inncscta Statutes lWS, Section 609.41, "Whoever, in m2lrJug any st2tement, ora! or written; w!1kh is 'req!!!red Qr authorized by law to be made
as a basis of imposing, reducing, or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any material matter which the maker of the
statement knows is false may be sentenced, unless otberwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more tban one year or to payment of a fine of not
more than $3,000.00, or both.
~i\L,L!!\IH'.L~.ti..-...._,,~..._.J,U.I.I..II\II,I.I_
-
Note: Must include Cityrrownsbip Resolution for reductions on assessments
Note: Must include Fire report for Local Option Disaster Credit
"."
.
RESOLUTION ABATING ASSESSMENT FOR
PARCEL NO. 34.030.20.23.0089
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
previously adopting assessments for the L.1. 357; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater,
Minnesota that the assessments for the Waterboard Water Service Install, L.I.
357, including penalties and interest are hereby abated.
Adopted this ih day of January, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
. ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
l
.
IV ~ernoranc urn
To: Mayor and City Council
From:
Klayton Eckles, Director of Public Works ~~_
Date: December 26,2002
Subject: Cost Sharing Agreement for Middle S1. Croix WMO Lobbing Effort
DISCUSSION
For the last six years the Middle S1. Croix WMO has been working to develop a solution to the
Pero creek drainage problem in Bayport. Since the drainage problem involves the State prison,
the WMO has been lobbying the legislature for funding assistance.
.
The WMO is proposing to use legislative associates to lobby the State. A portion of the City of
Stillwater drains into the Pero creek system, so we will be participating in the cost of any
project. Therefore, the City would also benefit from legislative actions. Theattached
agreement proposes $8,742 of cost for legislative assistance. City of Stillwater would have a
4.9% participation level or $375. The attached agreement is virtually identical to the agreement
used last year.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council approve the expenditure of up to $375 for lobbying efforts on
behalf of the Middle St. Croix WMO.
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council concurs with staff recommendation, Council should pass a motion authorizing an
expenditure of $375.
.
,~
CITY OF BAYPORT
.
294 North 3rd Street
Bayport, Minnesota 55003-1027
To: City of Stillwater, City of Oak Park Heights & Baytown Township
Phone: (651) 439-2530
From: Dan 10hanneck - City Administrator
Date: December 19,2002
RE: Stage 2 - State Storm Sewer Project - Funding Legislation Lobbying Effort
The Middle St. Croix WMO has commissioned Short Elliot Hendrickson Engineering to
commence with the preparation of plans and specifications for stage 2 of the State Storm Sewer
Project.
An effort must be made to obtain legislative funding for stage 2 construction and it has
previously been beneficial to obtain the services of a professional organization to make such .
effort:
Please find enclosed a resolution passed by the City of Bayport which outlines an agreement with
Legislative Associafes, Inc. and the actual agreement with Legislative Associates Inc. The
enclosed documents are identical to last year (Resolution #01-143) with the exception of relevant
dates and are meant for your use in getting approval from your governmental unit for the cost
sharing described in the enclosed documents.
We ask that you notify us by letter upon final approval of the specified local community costs by
your governing board.
Thank you for your consideration of this effort to obtain financing to complete construction of
stage 2 of the State Storm Sewer Project.
Sincerely,
f;tl
Dan J ~ meck
City ~inistrator
enclosures (2)
.
,
RESOLUTION NO. 02-115
.
EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF BAYPORT, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
HELD DECEMBER 16,2002
Pursuant to due call and notice therefore, a special meeting of the City Council of the
City of Bayport, Minnesota was duly held at the Bayport City Hall in said municipality
on the 16th day of December, 2002, at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present: Councilmember Kosmo, Kamps, Ridgway
and Schultz.
The following members were absent: Councilmember Menard.
Member Schultz introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION, CITY OF BAYPORT, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BAYPORT AND
LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC., TO PROVIDE STAFF SUPPORT FOR A
LEGISLATIVE EFFORT TO SEEK STATE FUNDING FOR STAGE TWO OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STORM SEWER RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT.
.
WHEREAS: The Minnesota Legislature of 1998 allocated $650,000 and in the year
allocated $2,680,000 for a total appropriation of $3,330,000 for engineering and
construction associated with Stage One of the Minnesota State Storm Sewer
Reconstruction Project; and,
WHEREAS: Stage Two ofthe State of Minnesota Storm Sewer Reconstruction Project is
estimated to cost $1.55 million; and,
WHEREAS: The City of Bayport in conjunction with the City of Stillwater, the City of
Oak Park Heights and Baytown Township desire to secure the services of Ed
Cain, Legislative Associates, Inc. to work with the Legislature in an attempt to
secure funding for Stage Two ofthe State Storm Sewer Project; and,
WHEREAS: Ed Cain of Legislative Associates, Inc. has submitted a proposal outlining
the tasks he will complete to assist in helping pass legislation for State support of
Stage Two State Storm Sewer Project; and,
WHEREAS: Mr. Cain's proposal has identified a proposal of $8,742 to complete his
work; and,
.
F:\Cvuuuvu\2002 Files\2002 RESOLUTlONS\02-1 15 legislative assoc. doc
Page 1 of3
,
WHEREAS: The participating communities of Bayport, Stillwater, Oak Park Heights,
and Baytown Township will share in the costs associated with Legislative .
Associates' work at the State Legislature based on the following allocations:
Communities
Cost Allocation
Formula
Local Community
Costs
Stillwater
Oak Park Heights
Baytown Township
Bayport,
4.9%
38.3 9%
18.93%
38.39%
$ 375
$3,356
$1,655
$3,356
TOTAL
100.00%
$8,742
and,
WHEREAS: Bayport will serve as a fiduciary agent for paying the cost of $8,742 to
Legislative Associates for work in the State Legislature associated with securing
funds for Stage Two of the State Storm Sewer Project; and,
WHEREAS: The City of Stillwater, Oak: Park Heights, and Baytown Township will
reimburse the City of Bayport for the costs associated with Legislative Associates'
work in the State Legislature in the amount identified in the cost allocation
formula above.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: By the City Council ofthe City of Bayport,
Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows:
.
1. Authorize an agreement between the City of Bayport and Legislative Associates,
Inc. to work with the State Legislature to secure funding to Stage Two of the State
Storm Sewer Project for a contract amount of$8,742.
2. Authorize and direct the Mayor and Administrator to sign such agreement with
Legislative Associates, Inc.
3. Authorize expenditures associated with the agreement between Legislative
Associates, Inc. and the City of Bayport to be paid for the year 2002 Allocated
Expenditure Reserve Fund 44100-540.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Ridgway and upon roll call being taken thereon, the following voted via voice:
Jim Menard - absent
Bob Kamps - aye
Allen Schultz - aye
Sharon Ridgway - aye
. Jim Kosmo - aye
.
F:\Common\2002 Files\2002 RESOLUTIONS\02-115 legislative assoc.doc
Page 2 of3
,
.
Thereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and signed by
the mayor and attested by the City Administrator. Passed by the City Council, City of
Bayport, Washington County, Minnesota on this 16th day of December, 2002.
~;;jJ
Daniel R. Johay61 eck
City Administr~r
o--~
~ Kosmo (
~ Mayor
,,-'J
.
.
F:\Common\2002 FiJes\2002 RESOLUTJONS\02- J 15 legislative assoc.doc
Page 3 of3
/
.
.
.
Page 1 of 3
7/01
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
LG214 Premises Permit Application
FOR BOARDUSEONL Y
Check #
Amount
Expiratation date
Class of Permit
Premises Permit Fee
During 2nd year of
Two years organization license
Check one
o
~
o
$400 $200
$250 $125
$200 $100
$150 $75
Class A - Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles, bingo
Class B - Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles
Class C - Bingo only OR bingo and pull-tabs when total gross
receipts does not exceed $50,000 per year
o Class D - Raffles only
Organization Information
Organization name (as it appears on documentation filed with
Minnesota Secretary of State or Intemal Revenue Service)
'(ft. (;t..e5+ LAk.. MJ He A~cJAf;(J"J
Name of chief executive offICer (cannot be your gambling manager)
Organization license number
Olf35"i
Daytime phone number,
including area code
(;~-/- 71"0- J 3.f7
D/J.-J K;f!J/~~
v
Gambling Premises Information
Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted
Street address (do not use a P.O. box number)
J+-- eM;}C ftlunc_ c-k. 1:.Je.- '5 {7 S M.-t ,'.J Sf- Siflw14/-rA, /'1;tJ 3-5"? y..J
City & county where gambling premises' is Iocated-OR- Township & countywhere gambling premises' is located if outside city limits.
Sf,' (L-<.M I,.~ Al/~4/.vfi.J
Is the premises located lJI!ithin city limits? YesJ8:1 No 0
If No, is township:
o Organized
o Unorganized
D Unincorporated
Does yOU! organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted?
DYes j8f No If no, attach (1) the appropriate lawful gambling lease form, and
(2) the sketch of all leased areas with dimensions and square footage clearly defined
A lease and sketch are not required for class D applications.
f!Ji;lme of legal owner of premises Address City StatelZip
k,' S'c<.J DudAJ
I 3 ~ t?t( I;;; ?1{ Sf; ~
Sf '/1 uI'I t~ J,VlN SSAf ~'.
Address(es) of Storage Space of Gambling Equipment
List all locations where used and unused gambling product is stored. Do not use a P.O. box number.
(Attach an additional sheet if necessary.)
Address, \ r
~.t-' ~r(.ttV /1u.5'C- C~ t<-. +
-~l1Je~~- fi;~~l~-b-~e -----
_____jQ_L~--~~---~~~~ ______
State/Zip
City
__~ftllu/-?kt1.- ____/1Al ~S;;if' ~_
_ -.f . e:
_t{!~~+~~___________/1d_ !Js-q?J
\.
Page 2 of 3
LG214 Premises Permit Application 7/01
Bingo Occasions for Class A or C Permits
If applying for a class A or C pennit, enter day and beginning/ending hours of bingo occasions (indicate A.M. or P.M.). No .
more than ten bingo occasions may be conducted per week. An occasion must be at least one and one-half hours, not to
exceed four hours.
Qgy Beainnina/Endina Hours Qgy Beainnina/Endina Hours Qgy Beainnina/Endina Hours
to
to
to
to
Noon Hour Bingo Only
Qgy Beainnina/Endina Hours
.~
Beainnina/Endina Hours
to
to
to
________ to _________
to
to
to
to
to
to
~
Beainnina/Endina Hours
to
to
to
Gambling Bank Account Information
Bank name f L
/) I~i~}s-h...p.el AAJ C
BC\l1. k street address
1(pS-O .)" t.. Ak- S+
Bank account number*
. City / State/Zip code __
H'U sf j)A Ke JJ1d S-S--cYf'S
* New organizations: The account number may be obtained and submitted to the Gambling
Control Board within ten days after you receive your premises permit.
Name, address, and title of members authorized to sign checks from the gambling account. The organization's
treasurer may not handle gambling funds.
. Name Street Address
hAttAf)' lJ19,(bd _ n &C/~ /I-Iu/I"q~ 1":.1...
V' v
A ( JI-4/ttt1c 2/lSt? ~ Folud /vi
'I
~ iJA,.j.~k,i~re-<-
Acknowledgment
Gambling site authorization
I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers,
the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner
of revenue or public safety or agents of the
commissioners may enter the premises to enforce the
law.
T7(O /11"lAi/~d o.~,'de.. i../alO td:~s 5"!:)OIt.(
Oath
I declare that:
]. I have read this application and all information submitted
to the board is true, accurate, and complete;
2. all other required information has been fully disclosed;
3. I am the chief executive officer of the organization;
4. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful
operation of all activities to be conducted;
5. I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota
governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and
agree, iflicensed, to abide by those laws and rules,
including amendments to them;
6. any changes in application information will be submitted
to the board and local \D1it of government within ten days
ofthe change; and
7. I \D1derstand that failure to provide required information
or providing false or misleading information may result
_iU_~_~~.~~____________________~~~~~~:~~:~:~:oca~r {~L~~;_~_____
Signature of chief executW'e officer (Designee may not sign) Date
Bank records information
The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of
the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill
requirements of current gambling rules and law.
Organization license authorization
I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to
modifY the class of organization license to be
consistent with the class of premises permit being
applied for.
.
. CitY Zip Code
L;.Jd!;-I~n _S--S"'clf's
f;-z.<d ~k ~5'P.1S:
Title
?"",J /i.i/q,;f I
,
ul
ceo
.
,
.
.
.
LG214 Premises Permit Application
Page 3 of 3
7/01
Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment and Approval
If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application and provide a resolution.
On behalf of the city, I hereby acknowledge this
application for lawful gambling activity at the premises
located within the city's jurisdiction, and that a Print name of city
resolution specifically approving or denying the
application will be forwarded to the applying
organization. Signature of city personnel receiving application
Title Date
If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county and township must sign this application.
The county must provide a resolution.
For the township On behalf of the township, I
acknowledge that the organization is applying to
conduct lawful gambling activity within the township
limits.
A township has no statutory authority to approve or
deny an application (Minn. Stat. 349.213, subd. 2).
For the county On behalf of the county, I hereby
acknowledge this application for lawful gambling
activity at the premises located within the county's
jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically
approved or denying the application will be for-
warded to the applying organization.
The information requested on this form (and any
attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board
(Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in
lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, and to assist the
Board in conducting a background investigation of you.
You have the right to refuse to supply the information
requested; however, if you refuse to supply this
information, the Board may not be able to determine your
qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue
you a premises permit. If you supply the information
requested, the Board will be able to process your
application.
This form may require the disclosure of your Social
Security number. If so, your Social Security number will
be used to determine your compliance with the tax laws of
Minnesota. Authorization for requiring your Social
Security number is found at 42 U.S.c. 405 (c)(i).
Your name and address will be public information when
received by the Board. All the other information that you
provide will be private data about you until the Board issues
your premises permit. When the Board issues your
Print name of township
Signature of township official acknowledging application
Title
Date
Print name of county
Signature of county personnel receiving application
Title
Date
premises permit, all of the information that you have
provided to the Board in the process of applying for your
premises permit will become public except for your Social
Security number, which remains private. If the Board does
not issue you a premises permit, all the information you
have provided in the process of applying for a premises
permit remains private, with the exception of your name
and address which will remain public.
Private data about you are available only to the following:
Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment
requires that they have access ~o the information; the
Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota
Attorney General; the Minnesbta Commissioners of
Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota
Legislative Auditor, national arid international gambling
regulatory agencies; anyone pJrsuant to court order; other
individuals and agencies that ~e specifically authorized by
state or federal law to have actess to the information;
individuals and agencies for which law or legal order
authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this
Notice was given; and anyone "fvith your consent.
I
Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at 651-639-4000. If you use a TTY, you can call
the Board by using the Minnesota Relay Service and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. This form will be made available in
alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. I
RESOLUTION 2003-03
APPROVING MINNESOTA PREMISES PERMIT FOR GAMBLING FOR
THE FOREST LAKE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, AT THE ST. CROIX MUSIC CAFE,
317 SOUTH MAIN STREET, STILLWATER, MN
WHEREAS, the Forest Lake Athletic Association at the St. Croix Music Cafe, 317 South
Main Street, Stillwater, MN has submitted an application to the City of Stillwater
requesting City approval of a Minnesota Gambling Premises Permit application; and
WHEREAS, it has been demonstrated that the organization is collecting gambling
monies for lawful purposes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Stillwater approves of the
gambling license requested by the Forest Lake Athletic Association at the St. Croix
Music Cafe, 317South Main Street, Stillwater, MN. The Clerk is directed to sign the
acknowledgement on the permit application and to attach a copy of this Resolution to
the application to be submitted to the Gambling Control Board.
Adopted by the City Council for the City of Stillwater this ih day of January, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
..
.
.
.
"
.
.
.
~emo
DATE:
January 3, 2003
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Chant ell Knau~;J
Director of Administration
FROM:
RE:
Sand Creek Contract Renewal for 2003
i
The City contracts Employee Assistance Program services through the Sapd Creek Group, Ltd.
Attached is the proposed contract for the term January 1 - December 31, 2003.
The total contract price for 2003 is $1,980. The cost per employee remains the same as was in
2000,2001, and 2002 at $22.50 per employee.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approvipg the Renewal
Agreement with the Sand Creek Group for Employee Assistance Program Services for January 1
- December 31, 2003 in the total amount of $1 ,980.00.
,,:.
333 North Main Street
Suite 203
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651) 430-33_
www.sandcreekeap.col.
INNOVATORS IN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE
Employee Assistance Agreement
between
The Sand Creek Group, Ltd
and
The City .0/ Stillwater
1. Sen,;ces Provided:
The program contract includes the following senJices:
1. Full senJice coverage for The City C?f Stillwater employees and their household
members.
2. Employee Assistance personnel policy develupment and consultation.
3. Supervisory training of management personnel in the use of the program.
4. Employee orientation seminars to familiarize your employees with the services
available to them.
.
5. Promotional materials including brochures, posters and newsletter articles to keep
your Employee Assistance Program visible to your employees, and their families.
6. Ongoing consultations with managers and supervisors to assist them in utilizing the
EAP within your organization.
7. Confidential assessment, referral and brief counseling to be provided to all
employees, and their family members. Up to four sessions of counseling based on the
clinical recommendation of EAP counselor. Each session being comprised of one
clinical hour. All of the employees of The City of Stillwater and their family members
may contact The Sand Creek Group for assessment, brief counsel and, when
necessary, referral free-of-charge to them. No limit is placed on the number of
assessments and referrals made Ufl1lually. All contact is strictly confidential.
8. 24 hour telephone crisis intervention.
9. Worksite visits from an EAP representative to continually evaluate the status of the
program and your satisfaction.
.
" Whatever you can do, or dream you can begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it." Goethe
.
.
.
/
II.
Ill.
Coordination of Services:
i
The City of Stillwater agrees to work with the EAP representati~e in informing its
I
employees of this agreement and the services which are available to them.
I
I
Use of Name:
The City of Stillwater agrees to allow The Sand Creek Group, Litd to list the City as a
customer on promotional materials. I
IV. Elit.ribilitv:
All employees of The City of Stillwater and members of their hO'f'sehold who are
experiencing personal, emotional, family or social problems wnich have direct,
I
indirect or potential effects on work performance or personal well being, are eligible
for the services of the Employee Assistance Program.
v: Emvlovee Particivation:
A working policy of the EAP is that Employee participation in t~e EAP will affect
neither future employment or advancement nor protect employe'e from disciplinary
action for continued substandard performance.
VI.
Revortinf{:
. '
The Sand Creek Group, Ltd will provide quarterly reports on pi'ogram utilization.
No information on individual employees will be released outside, of The Sand Creek
Group without the written consent of the employee.
VII. Retainer Cost:
The annual retainer charged by The Sand Creek Group, Lid fo~ the employee services
is as follows:
Number of employees
88
Cost per employee
$22.50
Annual EAP Contract Cost
$1.980.00
i
Term of Contract Jarmarv 1.2003 to December 31.2003
Optional Services:
Organization Development Services
Trauma Team Services
$200.00 per hour
$200.00/1st two hours
I
$ 100.00 per hour over two hours
I
$200.00 per hour of I
presentation/facilita1ibn Sand Creek Group, Ltd.
I SD.G.
Bag Lunch Seminars:
VIII. Fee for On1!oin1! Counselin1!:
Payment for any ongoing counseling services beyond the initial diagnostic screening ..
will be the responsibility of the employee/family member.
IX Modification or Termination of Contract:
This contract may be modified in writing at any time by the mutual consent of the
parties.
Either The City of Stillwater or The Sand Creek Group, Ltd may cancel this
agreement at any time upon 90 day notice, in writing, to the other party.
The Sand Creek Group, Ltd
#~A;~
The City of Stillwater
Gretchen M Stein, Ph.D., CEAP
President & Chief Executive Officer
The Sand Creek Group, Ltd
'-ft/dfJ II V'~
Date
.
Date
GMS:jes
.
.
The Sand Creek Group, Ltd.
SD.G.
.
APPROV AL OF CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SIfILL WATER
AND SAND CREEK GROUP, LTD.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the contract
between the City of Stillwater and Sand Creek Group, Ltd. to pr~vide an Employee
Assistance Program for the term January l, 2003 through December 31, 2003, hereto
I
attached as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and the appropriate city staff is authorized to
sign said contract.
Adopted by the City Council this ih day of January, 2003
i
I
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
· ~emo
DATE of MEMO:
January 3, 2003
DA TE of MEETING:
January 7, 2003
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
Chantell Knauss .dt~
Director of Administration
RE:
Request for Solid Waste Removal Waiver
i
,
I
Attached is a request the City received for a waiver from solid waste remqval. City Code
Section 30, Subd. 8 states that "The minimum charge for each and every qwelling unit shall be
based on the fee for a 3D-gallon container." For 2002, the 3D-gallon rate ,'vas $11.45/month. The
3D-gallon rate for 2003 is $12.25/month.
.
Subd. 9 provides criteria under which residents may be granted a waiver. II have attached this for
your information.
Ms. Coleman states she does not utilize the trash service, however, she also states that she does
I
recycle. The rates listed above include recycling charges that are part of the 3D-gallon minimum
service fee.
Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council deny the request for a waiver from solld waste removal due
to the applicant not meeting the criteria under City Code Section 30, SubdJ 9.
.
JOOI Owens Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
] ~ <<:;.~ D 'o/I~..;:;'\
'"
DEe 1 9 2002
J
- ..
December 16, 2002
Stillwater City Council
City Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing in regards to the city resolution concerning garbage and rubbish collection and a waiver for
such services in the near term. I am a new, single homeowner in Stillwater. I have recently had a terrible
experience with Waste Management, the city's contracted waste service provider. They failed to contact meas a
new customer before sending me bills for "services", which they could not in fact render because they failed to
provide me with a trash rC\.-cIJlacle in the first place. I did contact my city council member, and he Chantelle were
wonderful in resolving this matter. However, I am still dismayed by the required trash service prescribed in the
resolution.
As a single person who recycles and composts most of her waste, I find that I produce so little actual
trash that the city's resolution does me a disservice. Subdivision 9 indicates that citizens may apply for a trash
exemption if the fees are determined to be a hardship. I do not meet the age and/or disability requirements stated
in the resolution, but I find them to be reverse discrimination. If you will look at my monthly income, monthly
home payment, and lack of assets I am sure you will see that I do not, at 24, have much more money than
someone who is 62 with a small retirement package and social security check.
.
Furthermore, the required trash service penalizes someone who is trying to be responsible for the waste
she produces. Please note that the fees for each of the three container sizes favor those people who produce more
waste because per gallon fees for the 30, 60, and 90 gallon receptacles are $0.11, $0.07, and $0.05 respectively (if
those receptacles are filled each week). If I had 5 gallons of waste collected each week, I would pay $0.68 per
gallon, more than 13 times that of the 90 gallon per week rate. I was informed that other services are included in
the monthly fees such as recycling, bulk item pick up, appliance pick up, and tire pick up. However, up to this
point, I have taken care of my recycling for free at a particular drop-off point through my p~ents' service, I will
not have bulk items to dispose of in the near future since I just moved into a house (and in did have such items I
would utilize such resources as the Twin Cities Free Market website before considering disposal), and the
metropolitan mosquito control district takes old tires on your property and car service centers dispose of used tires
from your car.
One reason I was pleased to move to Stillwater and Washington County was their seemingly strong
emphasis (in their publications) on environmental consciousness. I produce about 13 gallons of trash every 3 or 4
weeks, which I have pennission to dispose of in friends' and relatives' rC\-cplacles. By requiring me to pay for a
.
. Page 2
December 16, 2002
30 gallon a week service, when I produce only 5 gallons, I am financially penalized for 90ing my part. I am sure
you see the anti-logic of this situation. I strongly believe we need to start taking responsibility for what we put into
.
our landfills, and a good place to start is by making people pay for the space they use.
I hope you carefully consider my case and my arguments for a trash exemption. Thank you for your time and
I
consideration.
Sincerely,
/} . (Jr,
r ~ clfr
Jill K. Coleman
.
.
S 30-1
STILLWATER CODE
vided in subdivision 8 of this chapter.
There is no charge for the collection of
extra household waste.
Subd. 7. Storage of garbage and rubbish. No
person shall place any garbage or rubbish in any
street, alley or other public place or upon any
private property, whether or not owned by the
person, within the city, unless it is in proper
containers for collection, nor shall any person
throw or deposit any garbage or rubbish in any
stream or other body of water. Any unauthorized
accumulation of garbage or rubbish on any prem-
ises is hereby declared to be a nuisance and is
prohibited. No person shall cast, place or deposit \
anywhere within the city any garbage or rubbish .
in a manner that may be carried or deposited by
the elements upon any street, sidewalk, alley,
sewer, parkway or other public place or into any
occupied premises within the city.
(Ord. No. 800, 12-6-94; Ord. No. 819, 10-7-95)
Subd. 8. Fees. Effective January 1, 2000, the
fee for collection per month shall be as follows:
For each 30-gallon container. . . . . . .
For each 60-gallon container. . . . ...
For each 90-gallon container. . . . . . .
Adjusted accounts.. ... . .. . . ..... ..
For each extra 30-gallon bag~ . . . . . .
For recycling services .. . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 9.80
11.59
13.45
7.35
1.50
1.65
The minimum charge for each and every dwelling
unit shall be based on the fee for a 30 gallon
container. Multifamily residences ofthree or more
units shall pay the mandatory rate for 30 gallon
containers per dwelling unit unless a different
rate is negotiated between the contractor and the
residence.
A residence shall be allowed to change container
size at intervals of not less than two billing
quarters and must give at least 30 day notice to
the contractor. When a proper notice is received,
changes in fees will be made to the following
quarter billing. Changes in containers and re-
lated fees shall only be made on a quarterly basis.
In the event a residence desires collection of
normal household waste in excess of the waste
held by the resident's container per week, they
Supp. No.6
shall place the waste in bags not exceeding 30
gallons. Residents shall pay the contractor $1.50
for each additional 30 gallon bag.
Residents who will be continuously absent. from
the city for more than 90 days shall be entitled to
a reduced rate of $5.00 per month during the
period of their absence.
(Ord. No. 886, ~ 1, 1-4-00)
Subd. 9. Relief for senior citizens and the dis-
I abled. Relief for senior citizens and the disabled
shall be as follows:
(1) The city council may, in its discretion,
waive the payment of any charges for
solid waste collection when it determines
by a majority vote as disclosed by an
application for relief that not more than
two people reside within a household and
that the head of household is 62 years of
age or older, or is retired by reason of
permanent disability regardless of age,
and that the payment of the solid waste
charges and fees would be a hardship.
(2) Persons seeking relief shall make appli-
cation on a form prescribed by the clerk
setting forth applicant's income and as-
sets at the time of the making of the
application.
(3) Relief granted hereunder shall terminate
upon the occurrence of any of the follow-
ing events:
a. The death of eligible persons, pro-
vided that the spouse is not eligible
for the same relief; or
b. If for any reason the city council
determines that the payment of the
solid waste fee would no longer be a/
hardship.
'--
Subd. 10. Collection of charges. Monthly fees
shall be due and payable quarterly in advance.
The charges shall be placed on the account of the
owner or occupier of the premises so served, or
both, and when paid, shall be deposited in the
solid waste and rubbish collection fund. All ac-
counts shall be delinquent if not paid within 90
days after the statement is rendered. The charges
shall be a charge against the owner, lessee or
\
/
\
CD30:4
.
\
!
>
.
\
.
.
.
.
APPLI1CA nON NO. 2002 -94
!
i
. I
WAIVER OF GARBAGE AND COLLECTION CHARGES
!
!
!
COUNCIL ACTION FORM
Applicant:
NAME Jill Coleman
ADDRESS
1001 Owens Street North
Recommended Action:
APPROVE
DISAPPROVE X
REASON FO~ DISAPPROVAL ADDl icant does not meet th~ criteria
established by City Ordinance.
DATE SUBMIITED: January 7, 2003
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-05
RESOLUTION RELATING TO FINANCING OF CERTAIN PROPOSED
PROJECTS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER;
ESTABLISHING COMPLIANCE WITH REIMBURSEMENT BOND
REGULATIONS UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council) of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota (the
City) as follows:
1. Recitals.
a. The Internal Revenue Service has issued Section 1. 103 -18 of the Income Tax
Regulations (the Regulations) dealing with the issuance of bonds, all or a portion
of the proceeds of which are to be used to reimburse the City for project
expenditures made by the City prior to the time for the issuance of the bonds.
b. The Regulations generally require that the City make a prior declaration of its
official intent to reimburse itself for such prior expenditures out of the proceeds of
subsequently issued borrowing, that the borrowing occur and the reimbursement
allocation be made from the proceeds of such borrowing within one year of the
payment of the expenditure or, if longer, within one year of the date the project is
placed in service, and that the expenditure be a capital expenditure.
c. The City desires to comply with requirements of the Regulations with respect to
certain projects hereinafter identified.
2. Official Intent Declaration.
a. The City proposes to undertake the following projects described on Exhibit A
attached hereto.
b. Other than (i) expenditures to be paid or reimbursed from sources other than a
borrowing or (ii) expenditures permitted to be reimbursed pursuant to the
transition provision of Section 1.103-18(1)(2) of the Regulations or (iii)
expenditures constituting of preliminary expenditures as defined in Section
1.103-18 (i)(2) of the Regulations, no expenditures for the foregoing projects as
identified on Exhibit A have heretofore been made by the City and no
expenditures will be made by the City until after the date of this Resolution.
c. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for the costs of
the designated projects out of the proceeds of the debt (the Bonds) to be
incurred by the City after the date of payment of all or a portion of the costs. All
reimbursed expenditures shall be capital expenditures as defined in section
1.150-1 (h) of the Regulations
d. This declaration is a declaration of official intent adopted pursuant to Section 1.
103-18 of the Regulations.
3. Budaet Matters. As of the date hereof, there are no City funds reserved, allocated on a 10_
term basis or otherwise set aside (or reasonably expected to be reserved, allocated on a
long term basis or otherwise set aside) to provide permanent financing for the expenditures
related to the projects other than pursuant toJhe issuance of the Bond. This resolution,
therefore, is determined to be consistent with the City's budgetary and financial
circumstances as they exist or are reasonably foreseeable on the date hereof, all within the
meaning and content of the Regulations.
4. Filinq. This resolution shall be filed within 30 days of its adoption in the publicly available
official books and records of the City. This resolution shall be available for inspection at the
office of the city clerk at the City Hall (which is the main administrative office of the City)
during the normal business hours of the City on every business day until the date of
issuance of the bonds.
5. Reimbursement Allocations. The City's financial officer shall be responsible for making the
reimbursement allocations" described in the Regulations, being generally the transfer of the
appropriate amount for proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse the source of temporary
financing used by the City to make payment of the prior costs of the projects. Each
allocation shall be evidenced by an entry on the official books and records of the City
maintained for the bonds, shall specifically identify the actual prior expenditure being
reimbursed or, in the case of reimbursement of a fund or account in accordance with
Section 1. 103-18, the fund or account from which the expenditure was paid, and shall be
effective to relieve the proceeds of the bonds from any restriction under the bond resolution
or other relevant legal documents for the Bonds, and under any applicable state statue, .
which would apply to the unspent proceeds of the Bonds.
Adopted this 20th day of August, 2002
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
2003 Capital Outlay
$1,306,450
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: City Administrator Hansen
SUBJECT: Fire Service Contract - City of Grant
DATE: December 27,2002
On Friday December 27,2002 Fire Chief Kallestad and I met with City of Grant Mayor
Tom Carr to discuss concerns regarding the Fire Contract submitted to Grant last
November.
Apparently the City of Grant is considering amendments to their service territory
currently served by the Stillwater Fire Department and are therefore not interested in
extending their contract to a three year term. Since the contract extension was primarily
recommended in response to concerns from the townships and not a big benefit to the
City of Stillwater, I recommend that we offer Grant the same 1 year contract as last year
with the exception that the contract amount be increased as per other contracts.
Enclosed for your review is the contract with the new amount.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a 1 year contract with the City of Grant for Fire Protection Service May 1, 2002
thru April 30, 2003.
ACTION REQUIRED
If council concurs with the staff recommendation, Council should pass a resolution
authorizing executing the contract.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of May 2002, by and between the City of Stillwater, a
municipal corporation of Washington County, Minnesota, hereinafter called "Stillwater" and the
City of Grant, a municipal corporation of Washington County, Minnesota, hereinafter called
"Grant".
.
WITNESSETH, that the Stillwater and the Grant agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
Stillwater agrees that from and after May 1,2002, and until April 30, 2003, it will upon
notification of the existence and location of any fire in Grant and upon the request for assistance
in the extinguishment, with reasonable dispatch, provide two units of motorized firefighting
apparatus, one of which shall be a water transport, suitable for use in the protection of life and
property against loss by fire in rural areas each manned by an operator capable of utilizing the
apparatus and equipment in an efficient manner. Additional personnel and equipment shall be
used where necessary and practicable, taking into consideration all of the demands being made
upon the Stillwater Fire Department. The use of additional firefighters of the Stillwater Fire
Department shall be left to the sole discretion ofthe Stillwater Fire Chief, or his duly authorized
agent, whose judgment in any particular instance shall be final and conclusive.
ARTICLE II
Grant agrees to pay Stillwater in current funds for the performance of this contract, the sum of
One hundred six thousand seven hundred ninety-eight and nollOOth dollars ($106,798.00), said
sum to be payable one-half (Yz) on or before July 31, 2002 and one-half (Yz) on or before
December 31,2002.
.
ARTICLE III
The operation, management and control of the personnel and equipment provided by Stillwater
hereinunder shall at all times beunder the charge and direction ofthe Stillwater Fire Chief, or
duly authorized agent.
ARTICLE IV
Stillwater shall not be liable in damages for injuries to the person or property or its agents,
officers and employees directly or indirectly resulting from the operation of Stillwater equipment
or from acts of omissions of Stillwater officers and employee or their agents, negligent or
otherwise, while engaged in the performance of this contract.
Stillwater or its agents, officers and employees shall not be liable to any person or entity for
costs, damages, expenses or other liability. To the extent Stillwater does not have insurance
.
.
.
.
coverage, including by not limited to commercial insurance or self-insurance pool, Grant agrees
to indemnify and hold Stillwater or its agents, officers and employees harmless from any costs,
damages or other liability of Stillwater, its agents, officers and employees arising from the
providing of Emergency Response Services with regard to any hazardous substance, pollutant or
contaminant, including any costs associated with the contaminant, removal of or remedial action
relating to any hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminate. Stillwater may not enter into any
contract with third parties, however, concerning these matters without the written permission of
Grant if the cost to Grant could exceed two thousand and noll 00 dollars ($2,000.00). Grant
shall, however, appoint three (3) Council members to act on its behalf in an emergency. The
names, addresses and phone numbers ofthe Council members shall be furnished to Stillwater.
Nothing in this contract shall be construed to extend or modify the Stillwater's and Grant's limits
on liabilities and immunities under Minnesota Statutes 9466.01 to 9466.15.
ARTICLE V
Under no circumstances shall Stillwater be obligated to respond to any request for assistance
when in the sole discretion of the Stillwater Fire Chief, or his duly authorized agent, anyone of
the following conditions exists: (1) when necessary personnel and equipment are engaged in
combating fire within Stillwater or elsewhere; (2) when road or weather conditions are such as to
constitute an unusual hazard; and (3) when providing of a response would expose any person or
property to unreasonable risk of harm from any release of threatened release of any hazardous
substance, pollutant or contaminant, and if while Stillwater personnel and equipment are engaged
in the performance of this contract, a fire should occur within the corporate limits of Stillwater,
the Fire Chief or duly authorized agent, may in their judgement and discretion withdraw all or a
portion of such personnel and equipment form the performance of this contract for the purpose of
responding to fire within Stillwater.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto executed this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF GRANT
CITY OF STILL WATER
BY
BY
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest
Attest
Diane Ward, Clerk
Date
Date
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED FIRE
PROTECTION CONTRACT WITH CITY OF GRANT
WHEREAS, the City of Grant has requested that the fire protection contract between the
City of Stillwater and City of Grant, approved by the City Council on November 12,
2002 be amended to read "for the period of May 1, 2002 to April 30, 2003".
BE .IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater that the fire protection
contract is so amended.
Adopted by the City Council this ih day of January, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
City Administrator Hansen
SUBJECT:
2003 Forestry Contract
DATE:
December 30, 2002
DISCUSSION
.
Accompanying this memo is the proposed Forestry Consulting Contract for 2003 and the
Foresters Activity Report for 2002. By all accounts from the Planning and Engineering
Departments, Kathy Widen has done an excellent job of providing consulting work for
the City and for providing citizens with information and recommendations regarding
diseased trees as well as appropriate planting for this area. From a budgetary perspective
$1400 remains in the Dutch Elm Fund. The remaining expense will be charged to
developers, projects and departments as appropriate.
RECOMMENDATION
Council approval of Forestry Contract for 2003.
.
'5'0
PLANT HEALTH ASC,
POl
Forestry Program
Final Report 2002
1/2/03
.
From: Katharine D. Wid in, Ph.D., Forestry Consultant
EvaluatioQ of Trees on Pub pc PrQQeO!
At the request of City Staff (torom. OevcL, Engineering/Public W orkB or Parks), I
visite<l sites within the City to evaluate the health of trees and make recommendations
regarding their care. . fhe trees examined included boulevard trees, park trees and trees
elsewhere on lands owned by the City. Meetings and memos regarding these issues
(9 hours)
EnIuatiol\.Qf Trees on Territorial Prison SIR
At the request of Steve Russell, Comm. Deve!. Dir., 1 visited the site of the
Territorial Prison in May and examined the area around the perimeter of the site. I made
recommendations regarding removal of potentially hazardous trees and trees which were
causing structural problems for the wall surrounding the sire. (1.5 hours)
Public Jnfol1lJoti9n Artides
I wrote articles regarding various tree issues for the City Newsletter (oak wilt and
the cost share grant, tree pruning, buckthorn, construction damage, treehea1thproblems,
tree planting, !lowering trees and shrubs) and also the Stillwater Gazette (oak wilt and the
cost share gram). (5 hours)
Forestrv "!Jot-l,.ine"
1 returned telephone calls from City residents and made site visit.. to look at trees
and recomPlend management for tree planting, pruning, removal and insect, disease and
cultural problems. In 2002 1 made 153 phone contacts and 81 site visits (this compares to
102 phone contacts and 48 site visits in 2001-50% and 68% increases, respectively). This .
is a very positive pan of the program and a service valued by residents. (33 hours)
,
Tree PlanUPIl Workshop
In the winter of 2002, I presented a tree selection and planting workshop with a
representative from the "Neighborhood Wilds)) program of the Minn. Dept. of Natural
Resources to residents of the Creekside Crossing neighborhood. This neighborhood was a
recipient of a DNR grant from the Neighborhood Wilds program. The residents are
working on a planting plan tor their home lots and frontage abutting me Brown's Creek
tributary area. (8.5 boors)
Brown's Creek Water Q~,tv PamDh1~f
I wrote copy for a brochure to be given to residents borderi~g the Brown's Creek
area regarding nativeplant cover to protect water quality. (6 bolD"S)'
QJlk Wilt :
Writing of oak wilt grant, oak wiltsurvey and work with property owners. (14.5 hours)
(6.5 hours for 2002 to be reimbursed from DNR grant in 2(03)
Iree Pr9tectiog
Site review of building placement, tree lOCD.tion and protection on wooded lots in the
Liberty/Legends developments. (8.5 hours - paid for by developer or builders)
Site review for City projects regarding tree selection, planting, care and protection.
Meetings and memos regarding these projects. (4 bours)
Total Hours for 2002 = 81.5 (City - 6.5 oak wilt grant) 8.5 (DeveloperlBuilder)
.
LOCATION:O
RX TIME 01/02 '03 16:26
'B'O
.
PLANT HEALTH ASC
POI
PLANT HEALTH ASSOCIATES, INC. - K.D~ Widin
EIN = 41-1553351
Date: 12/31/02
Invoice No. = 665-02
BiDing Period: 11/1/02-12/31/02
To: Larry Hansen
Administrator, City of Stillwater, Minnesota
(cc: Sharon Harrison)
. DATE
ll/l-12/31
HOURS
4.5
11/1-12/] I
11/1-12131
1.0
1.0
.5
1111-12/31
11/1 -12/31
6.0
.
--IT/l-12/3 1
*4.0
.
, DESLKlP'ftON
return phone calls to residents and make site visits re:
tree problems; record-Keeping
Article - winter newsletter
Oak Wilt grant - reimbursement request letter to
_dU_ pro~rty owners with oak wilt
l'latlve Plants and Water Quality: brochure for
neighborhoods bordering Brown's Creek (discuss
with S. RusselllK. Eckles)
memos. meetings. discussions WIth staff re: resident
site visits, evaluation health of trees on public
property and misc. tree issues; 2002 report and 2003
proposal for forestry program
LIberty Woodlands
1. request by developer to check oak ~U& .ivai at
edge of Reunion Rd. by Lot 5, Block 1 - site
visit, phone calls and memo (1.5 brs.)
2. Senn & Y oungdabl - tree removal and
protection Lot 3, Block 1 (2 site visits and
memo) (2.5 brs.)
Total Hours (City) = 13@ $40.00/hour ;: $520.00
(Developer) :;: 4 @ $40.00lbour = $160.00
Postage (Jap. beetle info. and oak wilt grant letters sent to residents) = $1.11
Total :: $681.11
.
LOCATION :0
RX TIME 01/02 '03 16:27
'EtO
PLANT HEALTH ASC
POl
Exhibit "A"
Forestry Consulting Work Program
For Year 2003
.
To: Larry Hansen, City Administrator, and City Council
City of Stillwater
From: Katharine D. Widjo, Pb~D.
Forestry Consultant
SERVICE
ESTIMAT~D
HOURS
1/2/03
WORKPROPOS~D
Maintenaoct: of Public
T~
Evaluatiun uf T~~ UI1
Public Property:
Boulevard Trees
Park Trees
Trees on City Propeny
EducatiooJOutreacb-
Wnte ArtJcles
10
Evaluations of ~es on public property to
determine nature of tree problem(s) and
whether or not specit1c trees should be
removoo or need other care ~ on a case by case
basis
Tree Information ~Fact
Sheets for Residents
5
Articles for City Newsletter (4) and
1 or 2 articles for the
Stillwater Gazette on tree-related issues
Return phone caJls trom residents and make
site visits regarding tree insect, disease and .
cultural problems. Send literature to residents
re~arding information I'eCluested.
Fact Sheets containing information about
boulevard tree'.planting and planting and care of
trees on private property
Workshops for resIdents on tree planting and
care and management of Eu.v....;,an buckthorn
(may be related to City projects)
5
Maintain Forestry HotlIne
30
Tree Care Workshops for
Residents
5
Tree Protection
Site de-Sign review tor
wooded lots - Liberty and
Legends develQpments
OakWllt
10
(developer)
Site review of building pJacemen~ tree locatiUJJ
and protection on wooded building lots
10
Survey for oak. wHt infection centeIS within the
City; provide information and assistance to
property owners in ~ wilt management; final
grant re~rt (due 6/03)
To proVide guideHnes~ site review for City
projects regarding tree selection, planting. care
and protection; to provide recommendations
and field instruction for control of buckthorn,
an invasive woody plant, in areas of public
projects
Site review/tree protection
and management p~jects;
memos, meetings, etc.
(2.0 are grant
hours)
15
Estimated Hours for 2003: City:: 7S (@$40.00/hour) = $3,000,00
(additional 15 bours - oak wilt grant and developer site reviews:: $600.)
.
LOCATIDN:O
RX TIME 01/02 '03 16:28
.
.
.
FORESTRY CONSULTANT CONTRACT
FOR 2003
This contract is made this th day of January 2003, between the City of Stillwater, a
Home Rule Charter City of the third class, existing under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, with offices at 216 North 4th Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, "City", and
Kathy Widin, Plant Health Associates, Inc. 13457 Sixth Street North, Stillwater,
Minnesota 55082, "Consultant".
RECITALS
The City desires to retain the services of the Consultant to provide consulting services
in the development and maintenance of a forestry management program.
Consultant agrees to perform these services for the City under the terms and conditions
set forth in this Contract.
In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed between the City
and the Consultant as follows:
SECTION I. NATURE
OF WORK
Consultant will perform the services as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" on behalf of
the City.
SECTION II. PLACE
OF WORK
It is understood that Consultant services will be rendered largely in the field or at
Consultants place of business and not in the Office of the City.
SECTION III.
COMPENSATION
1. The City will pay to the Consultant as follows:
a. $40.00 per hour for services listed in Exhibit "A" or as otherwise
approved by the City.
b. Ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred by the Consultant
and attributable to the work will be reimbursed by the City provided that
prior written approval is given by the City.
SECTION IV.
STATUS OF CONSULTANT
This Contract calls for the performance of the services of the Consultant as an
independent contractor and the Consultant will not be considered an employee of the
City for any purpose.
SECTION V.
INDEMNIFICA TION
Any and all claims that arise or may arise against the Contractor, its agents, servants or
employees as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the Consultant or its
agents, servants or employees while engaged in the performance of this Contract shall
in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. Consultant shall indemnify, hold
harmless and defend the City, its officers and employees against any and all liability,
loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorney's fees, which the
City, its officers or employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be inquired to pay, arising
out of or by reason of any negligence or willful act or omission of the Consultant, its
agents, servants or employees, in the execution, performance or failure to adequately
perform Consultant's obligations under this Contract.
.
SECTION VI.
AUTHORITY
The City hereby grants to the Consultant all authority reasonably necessary to pursue
and achieve the objectives of this Contract.
SECTION VII.
DURATION
This contract will be in effect from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 20032 and
will be renewable on an annual basis upon mutual agreement by both parties. This .
agreement may be terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days written notice to
terminate the agreement by the party
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this th day of January, 2003.
CITY OF STILLWATER
By:
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
By:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
PLAT HEALTH ASSOCIATES, INC.
By:
Kathy Widin
.
Memorandum
.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Diane Ward, City Clerk
DATE: January 3,2003
SUBJECT: Towing License - Stillwater Towing
Stillwater Towing has submitted the required information for their 2003 Towing License.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend the issuance of the towing license conditioned upon ChiefDauffenbach's
review and approval.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-11
RENE\VAL OF TOWING LICENSES FOR 2003
WHEREAS, Stillwater Towing, Inc., has requested renewal of a towing license for 2003;
and
WHEREAS, all forms and documentation have been received and fees paid;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota,
that" the towing license for Stillwater Towing, Inc. is renewed for the Year 2003.
Adopted by Council this ih day of January, 2003.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
.
.
.
.
.
.
TOWING LICENSE
The City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota hereinafter referred to as "the
city", hereby grants a towing license to StiHwater Towing, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "the
company" and the license shall be on the terms and conditions set forth in this license and subject
to annulment and revocation as provided herein.
I. EQUIPMENT. The company must provide equipment that includes at a
mInImum:
a. Equipment to handle all vehicles including those with fiberglass
bodies.
b. Vehicle dollies or flatbed for towing vehicles that cannot be moved by
conventional means.
c. Equipment of sufficient size to handle semi tractor trailer vehicles or in
the alternative have the ability to provide this equipment to a location
within a reasonable time period.
d. Equipment needed to sweep and remove accident debris and also
equipment to jump start vehicles.
e.
Winching equipment of sufficient size and strength to winch vehicles of
!ractor trailer type or ability to provide this equipment to a location within
a reasonable time period.
f. Emergency lights conforming to standards set forth in the Minnesota
Highway Traffic Regulation Act and from time to time promulgated by
the Commission of Public Safety ofthe State of Minnesota.
II. FACILITIES. The company must provide storage for the vehicles it tows and
these facilities must include at a minimum:
a. A vehicle storage lot within the city or within a reasonable distance from
the city. The storage lot must be secured by a 6 foot fep.ce with a
lockable gate.
b. The storage facility must be large enough to store 15 cars.
c. The facility must have indoor storage in order to protect vehicles from
inclement weather when necessary to avoid damage to the vehicle or
when indoor storage is ordered by the police department.
d.
The facility must have secure indoor storage that consists of at least one
stall that is totally secure, even from employees of the company. These
stalls are used for the storage for vehicles that are to be held as evidence
or that may contain evidence and are awaiting a search warrant.
.
III. IMPOUND AND RELEASE PROCEDURES. The towing company must
agree to abide by the Stillwater Police Department's policy and procedure
directives dealing with the release of vehicles to citizens. They must further agree
to abide by "hold" orders issued by members of the police department. The
companies and their drivers must agree to abide by the requirements of the police
impound report filled out by the officer at the scene of the tow.
IV. RESPONSE TIME TO THE SCENE OF TO'V OR TO IMPOUND LOT.
All tow companies must agree to a minimum response time of ten minutes to the
scene of a requested tow or to the impound lot, or unless a longer period is
required because of a need for special equipment.
V. RESOLUTION OF COMPLAINTS. All tow companies must provide to the
Stillwater Police Chief a procedure for handling citizen's complaints dealing with
the tow service. This procedure must be submitted within 30 days of the granting
of this license.
VI.
CRIMINAL HISTORY AND DRIVING RECORD CHECKS. All owners
and drivers must agree to a criminal history and driving record check and a history
oftheft or drug related crimes and any convictions for DWI, reckless driving or
repeated speeding violations shall render that driver or owner disqualified to
provide any service hereunder.
.
VII. INSURANCE. The company shall carry and keep in full force and effect general
liability insurance to include coverage of any damage to towed vehicles, and proof
of this insurance shall be onfile with the city prior to the issuance of this license.
VIII. CLEAN-UP. The tow driver shall clean up the debris at accident scenes.
IX. INSPECTION. The equipment and facilities of the company shall be subject to
inspection by the Police Chief or his designee to insure compliance with the
provisions of this license.
X. NON-EXCLUSIVE. This license shall be non-exclusive and shall not preclude
the city from granting as many additional licenses as they see fit. In the event of
additional licenses, tows will be divided among the companies according to the
interests of Public Safety as ordered by the Police Chief.
XI.
REVOCATION OF LICENSE. The breach of any covenant or condition
contained in this license shall be grounds for revocation hereof. The revocation
.
.
.
.
By:
Attest:
shall be ordered by the Stillwater Police Chief and any company that feels
aggrieved by his decision may appeal his decision to the City Council where the
company shall be entitled to a full hearing.
Granted this 7th day of January, 2001.
Larry Dauffenbach, Chief of Police
Diane Ward, City Clerk
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
.
Department: MIS
Date: 1/3/03
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Purchase of three computers for Engineering/Public Works Dept.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with
this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
Total cost is $5404.11 plus tax. This was budgeted for in Capital Outlay for
2003.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED Yes X
No
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY
SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE
COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
.
Submitted by: Rose Holmau ~.~
I Date: 1/3/03
.
Minnesota State Store: Current E-quote
1-800-981-DELL
Page 1 of2 ,
Current Orderform I Retrieve E-Qu
Minnesota S.
Your current E-quote Number: E002486476 Detail
Full Catalog I Software, Periphe .
Help with E-quotes (Click Here)
VieVi Cptions:
Total Price*: $1,841.57
r View Order Summary
r. View (
Description
1 Dell Precision â„¢ Workstation 340 Minitower Intel@ Pentium@ 4
Processor, 2.66GHz, 512K /533 Front Side Bus
[> edit this item [> delete this item
Date:
Catalog Number:
Dell Precision â„¢ Workstation 340 Minitower:
Memory:
Keyboard:
Monitor:
Graphics Card:
Hard Drive:
Floppy Drive:
Operating System:
Mouse:
CD ROM, DVD, and Read-Write Drives:
Speakers:
Hardware Support Services:
Installation Services:
Energy Starâ„¢:
[> add item to your E-quote
~
Place Order
E-quote E002486476 Details
Saved By
Quantity
Unit Price
$1,841.57
Iten
$1,:
11
[> update
Friday, January 03, 2003 12:35:36 PM CST
84 RC956882
Intel@ Pentium@4 Processor, 2.66GHz, 512K /533 Front Sid
34T266 - [ 221-1165 ]
512MB PC800 RDRAM@(2 RIMMSTM)
512N42 - [311-24091
!Enhanced Performance, USB (8 Hot Keys)
U8 - [310-2701]
19 inch Dell (17.90 inch vis) M992 Monitor
M992 - r 320-0531]
nVidia, Quadro2 EXTM, 32MB, VGA
,QUAD2EX - r 320-1533]
40GB ATA-100 IDE, 1 inch (7200 rpm) .
,40172 - r 340-8562 1
3.5 inch 1.44MB Floppy Drive
3 - \340-3736 ]
Microsoft@) Windows@ 2000 Professional (Service Pack 2)
W2K - [420-15361
Logitech@, USB, Optical (2-button, w/scroll)
LO.-l310-14641
20/48X IDE CD-ROM and 40Xl10Xl40X CD Read-Write
ROMRW40 - r 313-1137)
harman/kardon 206 Speakers
HK206 -! 313-1042)
3Yr Parts + Onsite Labor (Next Business Day)
U30S -\900-6212) [ 900-6940 )
No Installation
NOINSTl -\900-9987 )
Energy StarTM
ES -l310-6414)
Total Price* $1,
Rose M Holman(rholman@ci.stillwater.mn.us)
.
http://rcommerce. us.dell.comlrcommlbasket.asp
1/3/2003
.
.
.
Minnesota State Store: Current E-quote
1-800-981-DELL
Page 1 of2
Current Orderforrn I Retrieve E-Qu
Minnesota S'
Your current E-quote Number: E002486496 Detail
Full Catalog I Software, Periphe
Help with E-quotes (Click Here)
Viev..; Oplions:
Total Price*: $3,562.54
r View Order Summary
(:' \Jie\v {
Description
1 Dell Precision â„¢ Workstation 340 Minitower Intel@ Pentium@ 4
Processor, 2.40GHz, 512K 1533 Front Side Bus
[> edit this item [> delete this item
Quantity
12
Iten
$3,!
Date:
Catalog Number:
Dell Precision â„¢ Workstation 340 Minitower:
Memory:
Keyboard:
Monitor:
Graphics Card:
Hard Drive:
Floppy Drive:
Operating System:
Mouse:
CD ROM, DVD, and Read-Write Drives:
Speakers:
Hardware Support Services:
Installation Services:
Mouse Pad:
Energy Starâ„¢:
[> add item to your E-quote
Place Order
E-quote E002486496 Details
http://rcommerce.us.dell.comlrcomm/basket.asp
Unit Price
$1,781.27
[> update
Friday, January 03, 2003 12:41:40 PM CST
84 RC956882
Intel@ Pentium@4 Processor, 2.40GHz, 512K 1533 Front Sid;
34T24 - [ 220-9508 ]
512MB PC800 RDRAM@ (2 RIMMSTM)
512N42 - [311-24091
Enhanced Performance, USB (8 Hot Keys)
U8 - r 310-2701 ]
Dell UltraSharpTM 1504FP 15 inch Flat Panel Monitor (15.0 inl
1504FP - r 320-0427]
nVidia, Quadro2 EXTM, 32MB, VGA
QUAD2EX - r 320-1533]
40GB ATA-100 IDE, 1 inch (7200 rpm)
40172 - [ 340-8562 1
3.5 inch 1.44MB Floppy Drive
3 - [ 340-3736 1
Microsoft@ Windows@ 2000 Professional (Service Pack 2)
W2K - r 420-1536]
Logitech@, USB, Optical (2-button, w/scroll)
LO - [310-1464]
20/48X IDE CD-ROM and 40Xl10Xl40X CD Read-Write
ROMRW40 - [313-1137]
harman/kardon 206 Speakers
HK206 - [313-1042]
3Yr Parts + Onsite Labor (Next Business Day)
U30S -\900-62121 (900-69401
No Installation
NOINSTL -\900-9987 ]
v10use Pad
II1PAD - r 310-00071
:nergy Starâ„¢
:S - [310-6414]
Total Price* $3,
11312003
.
.
.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
Department: ~~,,~"JIII!-jJllti-;-~-J"~IiI"~bf;~ l.,.{)o.ek-~Date: December 30, 2002 .
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Request to obtain two or three quotes for a sign-making machine
and cutter.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with
this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
Budgeted under signs and lighting capital outlay 2003.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY
SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED INTHE
COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
tie aI_
I ?:(;'i,- - -- -..-
I Submitted by:
I Date: 12-30-02
---
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
I Department: Parks/PublicWorks/Sewer
Date: December 30, 2002
.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Request to order and purchase the following equipment under the State Bid.
Street Dept.
Single Axle Plow under body truck
Tar kettle
Shop
Benches
Shelving
Work Stations
Parks Dept
Riding Mower
Turf Tractor
Sewer Dept
Back Hoe Tractor
Portable Pump
Sewer Tilt Camera
Sewer Root Cutter
.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with
this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
All items are budgeted for Capital Outlay 2003.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY
SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE
COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
t 'y ... \//]
Submitted by: ~. ~v~ C~ ~ -- -- Date: 12-30-02
.
~
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director (L/
December 27,2002
Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval with Condition for Construction
of a Garage with Variance Setback and Oversized Accessory Structure. Case
No. V/02-77.
Background. This item was reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission on
November 13, 2002 and continued to December 9, 2002. A revised design with increased
setback was approved by the Planning Commission at the second public hearing. A condition of
approval was passed on the project requiring an existing accessory structure be reduced in size to
the allowed 120 square feet. This is the maximum size of an accessory structure in addition to
the garage in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
.
The applicant has appealed.the decision of the Planning Commission most particularly the
condition of approval requiring reducing the square footage of the existing accessory building to
120 square feet.
Decision before Council: Alteration of appeal.
Attachments: CPC staff report and minutes of 12/9/02, letter of appeal, 12/16/02 and Notice of
Public Hearing 12/25/02. '."
.
Dee 16, 2002
.
Community Development Director
Steve Russell
216 North Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN
re: V/02-77
Steve, I was pleased with the Planning Commissions approval of the co....... .omise location
we worked out for my proposed garage. I would be happy to build the garage in the
manner we worked out. However, I wish to appeal the condition tacked on at the last
minute to tear down completely my existing storage shed, or to reduce it in size to 120 sq.
feet. Here are my reasons for appealing this condition:
1 I have already addressed the concerns of having out buildings that are too large by
reducing the size of my ...u..osed garage on two separate occasions.
2 The Total of the existing shed and the proposed garage would still be less then 1000 sq.
feet.
3 I have the support of my neighbors. We have provided the City with at least four letters .
from my neighbors indicating support for my proposed garage.
4 It would look worse. In a ~u...romise, and acting on Steve's suggestion, I reduced the
size and moved the proposed garage back to align it with the existing shed. If I reduce the
size of the existing shed, the two buildings will no longer be aligned. It would look worse.
5 My in home business does not cause walk up traffic, or parking problems that are a
nuisance to the neighborhood. Ifit did, I would not have the support of my neighbors for
this project.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Ctit~~
Dan Challeen
.
..
.
.
.
);illwater
~ .. ~ - .~ ~
--- -\
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
December 25, 2002
RE: VARIANCE
Dear Property Owner:
The City Council of the City of Stillwater has received an appeal of the Planning
Commission decision on a request from Dan Challeen for a variance to construct a 24' x
28' garage with a 12 foot setback (30 feet required) at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in the
RB, Two Family Residential District applicant. Case No. V 102-77.
The City Council will be considering this case at a public hearing on Tuesday, January 7,
2003 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
If you have any comments or concerns regarding this request, please attend the
meeting.
All persons wishing to be heard in reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
~
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve
the variance to the front yard setback for the construction of a new single family
residence on the lot north of 721 South Martha Street with the following conditions:
1. The house and site plans shall require design permit review and approval to
provide design detail for Stillwater theme house before a building permit is
issued.
2. The driveway easement shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded
before a building permit is issued.
3. The new residence shall be service by city water and sewer systems.
4. Any septic tank located on the site shall be removed.
5. Drainage plan to be reviewed by the City Engineer.
6. Impervious surface not to exceed 30% of total lot area.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-75. A variance to the rear yard setback (25 feet required, 18 feet
requested) for the construction of a gazebo located at 504 South Owens Street in
the RB, Two Family Residential District. Patrick O'Neal, representing Marcella .
Thorene, applicant (continued from November 13, 2002 meeting).
This case was continued from the November 13, 2002 Planning Commission
meeting for redesign.
Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Wald to
approve the variance to the rear yard setback for the construction of a gazebo located
at 504 South Owens Street. Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-77. A variance to construct a 241 x 281 garage with a 12 foot
setback (30 feet required) at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in the RB, Two Family
Residential District. Dan Challeen, applicant (continued from November 13, 2002
meeting). .
This case was continued from the November 13, 2002 Planning Commission
meeting to provide the applicant an opportunity to work with staff on a redesign
proposal.
Mr. Challeen met with staff on site to review the condition of the site. The MnDOT
TH 95 right-of-way is approximately 13 feet inside the paved roadway. Mr.
Challeen has repositioned the garage to be lined up with the existing garage with
a 12 foot setback. The new garage is located 10 feet from the adjacent framed .
shed.
3
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
A second variance. is required because with the construction of the new garage,
the existing framed shed (accessory structure) is too large (12 square feet
maximum allowed) for an accessory structure in addition to the garage.
An electronic repair business I s currently approved for the residence. (SUP/89-
22). If the variances are approved, no business activity is allowed in the garage
or shed.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to
approve the variance to construct a 24' x 28' garage with a 12 foot setback at 2103
Schulenberg Alley with the following condition:
1. Existing accessory structure must meet square footage requirements (not to
exceed 120 square feet).
Motion passed. 7 fore, 1 against.
Case No. SUB/02-76. A resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres
located at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Dan
. Challeen, applicant (continued from November 13, 2002 meeting).
This case is related to the variance request for the garage setback.
Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Middleton
to approve the resubdivision of lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres located at 2103
Schulenberg Alley with the following condition:
1. A legal survey shall be filed at the County.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-79. A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 28 feet
requested) for the construction of a porch at 1017 4th Avenue South in the RB,
Two Family Residential District. Richard and Jane Christopher, applicants.
.
Ms. Christopher requested a variance to the front yard setback for the
construction of a porch. The porch would extend from the front edge of the
garage across the front of the house. There is an existing 6 foot by 8 foot shed
roof entryway that would be replaced. The front if the garage and the shed roof
entryway are located 28 feet from the front property line. The porch addition will
stay at the existing 28 foot setback from the property line.
4
Memo
.
To:
.From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
December 5,2002
Continued Public Hearing on Variance to Front Yard Setback for Construction
of a New Additional Garage (Case No. V/02-77).
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of November 13,2002 to
provide the applicant an opportunity to work with staff on a resign proposal. The applicant met
with staff on site to review the condition of the site. The MnDOT TH 95 right of way is
approximately 13 feet inside the paved roadway. The applicant has repositioned the garage
to be lined up with the existing garage and with a 12 foot setback. The new garage is locatedlO
feet from the adjacent framed shed.
A second variance is required because with the construction of the new garage, the existing
framed shed (accessory structure) becomes too large (120 square feet maximum is allowed)for .
an accessory structure in addition to the garage.
Because the site is located on MnDOT right of way, the application was referred to MnDOT for
comment. The MnDOT letter of review indicates a garage setback to accommodate two full
sized automobiles end to end is 36-40 feet.
An electronic repair business is currently approved for the residence (Case No. SUP/89-22). If
the variances are approved, no business activity is allowed in the garage or shed.
This additional information is presented for your review and decision.
Recommendation: Decision on request. .
Attachments: CPC staffreport from 11/13/02 meeting, MnDOT letter of 11/25/02.
CPC Action on 12/9/02: +7-1 approval with added following condition of approval:
1. Garage is okay, but must reduce size of existing shed to 120 square feet.
.
'ReV i sed
_'11.1 "".'1', 1"11 jlll I I 1'1 11111 I II' lilli, 111"'~.'11II 1,., ,............,11.".11...
=
-..-...--
"'........-...-.
"
'....
tJ o1(T'H
2.. 'if "
II- ^7 -02-
. 'Ro.ffey.$
~ ~1. ytl aV-
o Ce~+eyr
.,.
, ,.
. ~ WJlite. 'l'~ho'/i"LO~foI ~ ~ ~
vYI\41 s ,J l'IIj W",Jo..:: 0,'" .
. - VOO~
IO'x9"
.r JZ.-'''5.''Ji~ Joov
>
31"
jl!..,tI,(..~
d oot':~
""
-
.
.,
o.M, Docr'
Ib';<91
...
~
~
)
i
__ ...~. ._._.~.."._.~_"".".,.,...! "~I i
_.
't
,
WES'T
;:{8' >
"
i\
~5"
\1
..
-. .~I
"'~-I
.(
'14
cAS'"
.,.
~ -. . -- Sk" ,;,hlf
e"'. .f
- -
.' ,'. .:, :, : I ~ ': I w, ' ..: . ~~ I ~ .: ~ B/~/a. ~tJ
'. . I . , . \ . . y . . . ;~ ';1, h,"}^,
50UiH
1<: ~yl >
fVlJfosed G().t'etj~
. J)a YJ.__Cha, IleeYl..._n___
2./03.. .
5vh.~be~q
J.io
or.
II
~.~
~ .
i~ """
!;.;,j I\J
"{
o
o
o (J
o '
fvoposed . 8o.(<tu~
reV; se...J 1.0 G a.,f; O~
N oV 1...7 ;2. DOL,
..
"
'.
...
.
\
il
J 0
I
.'-'::-:-',",
i
Ii
" , .-"
: ~:.c
... ~ I
~ .'
, . iiJ .17/ .'.' "'+'
~~ '~. ': ~ - ~ ~~: ~~:.:, --: :~..:
-- . -.- ..~ ,
.. ., :-....:.4".:
"
. I
o
; -~
.0,/"'- ~;;~~.',,~
. '-',
~ -\~ r
,. '..'. ~ '. i)
~ '.J ........j \
\I "'." . .' .
"..1 , .....
""-- . I
'-e r~'.
--.. . ~.
~"'~ f':;
^ .....' -;/
--- - --v-v '.'
...-...'
/'
,.,....'
",../
../;
...A'l~.
~
~
to.:
leo
:iti-
I
612 Sttfetf
#8 Sf.. fl (as. .,.4~
THe. V ;QI.t.:; p~o p cso..l
~
.....
~
.
.
.
01
~..y
Minnesota Departm....t of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 82
Roseville. MN 55113
November 25, 2002
~
~ '-,.
. <p l1ftV
V
Ms. Sue Fitzgerald
City Planner
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Ms. Fitzgerald:
This is in response to your letter of November 18, 2002, enclosing a request being made to the
City of Stillwater for a Variance from the required property setback to construct a garage, at 2103
Schulenberg Alley.
We understand that the applicant is requesting a three (3) foot setback, instead of the required 30
feet, with the result that most of the parking pad would be on Trunk Highway (TH) 95 Right of.
Way.
The Minnesota Depcul.uent of Transportation recommends that you deny this request for a
variance, so as to avoid any parking on the m 95 Right of Way. We recommend that the
driveway between the m 95 boundary and the I:'>ul'osed garage be of sufficient length to provide
for stacking space sufficient to park two full-size automobiles end-to-end.
Please call me if you have questions onthis, at (651) 582-1462.
Sincerely,
~
~ c Jr4t
Marv McNeff
Transportation Planner
cc: Sandra Cullen, Washiilgton County Transportation Engineer
Joe Lux, Transportation Planner
Ann Braden, Metropolitan Council
.Paul Czech, .Mn/DOT Metro Division
-----~ .--
~
,
An equal opportunity employer
(-.....
. .
To: City of Stillwater
Nov 13, 2002
I am Dan Challeen's neighbor from across the street. I think it is O.K. for him to build his
garage in the place he wants to build it.
sincerely.
~~
Hazel Wmterlin 2023 Schulenberg, Stillwater,
.
.
.
, 0
.-
... MA:~~~NC~ .
-
.
Nove~ber 13i 2002
City of Stillwater
RE: Variance request - Dan Challeen
.
Wolf Marine, Inc. has no objections to the request of
Dan Challeen to ~onstnuct a 24' X 3D' garage with a
3 foot setback at 2103 Schulenberg Alley;
Sincerely,
Wolf Marine, Inc.
Kenneth Wolf
.
uq
514 E. Alder St. · Stillwater, MN 55082 · 651-439-2341 · Fax 651-439-3494
www.wolfmarine.net · Email: info@wolfmarine.net
November 2, 2002
To the City of Stillwater, Planning Commission
216 N Fourth St., Stillwater, MN 55082
From Tony Kerschbaum, 2017 Schulenberg Alley, Stillwater, MN
Re: Case SOO/02-76 and V/02-77
This letter is td CiAJ.ll "ss my support for the resubdivision and the variance requested by my
neighbor Dan Challeen. I have known him for over ten years. He has spoken with me
about the design, and I have seen the area Dan proposes to build his garage, and feel that
it is a"},,u"l~ate for our neighborhood. .
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Sincerely
../
/'
/"
I
c ~.
.
:,..
e
.
.
.
..----.,-....
'.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. V/02-77
f/
Planning Commission Date: November 13 2002
,
Project Location: . 2103 Schul~nberg Alley
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District:
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: A Variance to construct a 24' by 30' garage with a 3 foot front yard
setback (30 feet required).
Discussion: The request is for a Variance to construct a 24' by 30' garage with a three foot front
yard setback. The applicant shows an existing driveway to the proposed garage on the attached
Site Plan. The proposed garage needs to be located at least 20 feet back from the front ..~vyerty
line because the following issues: . .. . .
1. . The driveway shown on the attached site plan is on highway right of way land
and cannot be used as the driveway for the garage. .
2. The Stillwater Zoning Ordinance states, "where a uniform yard setback exists
which is less than 30 feet, any building or structure erected, structurally altered
or enlarged may conform to the established setback but in no case shall a
setback less than 20 feet be allowed".
Recommendation: Denial
Conditions of Appro~:
Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggest the following conditions of approval:
1. The garage shall be similar in style, colors and materials as the main stnlcture.
. Findings: . .. .., . ..
1. That a hardship peCUliar to the p~operty, not Created by any act of the owner, exists. In thiS. .
context, personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits and neighboring violations are
not hardships justifying a variance.
2. That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment ofsub~ial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity; and that a variance, if
granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
~
~ .r:
3. That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property .
and not materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely
affect the Comprehensive Plan. .
. . Attachments: Application FormlLetterfrom .Applicant/Site P1anILetter fiUlU Neighbor
. -
.
e
.
.
.
V'" ' -~/ }-
~NING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF Sn.LLWATER. .
. ~16 NO~TH FOURTH .STREET .' ".
.. STitLWATER, MN 55082. .' .
ease No: t/f1t
Date Filed: ~
Fee Paid: ~
Receipt No.: ~
ACTION REQUESTED FEES
_SpeciaVConditional Use Permit $50/20(
~aljance:. .... '~<i7 20C
.XResubdiyjsion . .~$fOO .'
Subdivision* $f 0+5.
-Comprehensive Plan Amendment. $500
_Zoning Amendment. $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting materi
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material Is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies 0
supporting material Is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will de,
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project. 2.103. 5d wlUlb.f!,'1' j '.sf;/lwa14!.r, Ass~ssor's :Parcel No:; / /J30<<IJI'Id()() #l c
. . . . . (GEO Code) "Oc
Zoning District R B . Description of Project :I:k:;fa.t.I,J <1-....,,.. c-e-- r'eS"Itt/ __. vi.! e-
v :fe::> C~M;/nc, {-~
-f;...t YA"J "e-rh""dc.- 1 F1 5FtS;.lewdf~ .
tv ilL It,.; 2--J a,.;"p "If;.<- f- ,=" fl'" and in hOme.... .b....HI e ~? .
"/ hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be. true and correct. I further certify I will comp~
the permit if it is granted and used. "
PrppertyOwner-Pa. Jt\. Cha.,l/een...
Mailing ~ddress. :()tJ 3 S~~",.,l~he,,~
City-State-Zip : S!J"/IWA.,fW 'I1r/-ss-o.[1:;-. .City-Stat
Telepho~l~~ 65'. .~ ;J.7V3 c!Jt;t"""
*1 oJ. 651 ~ 30 3 8~O H4Mt..t4~
Signature~/7~ ./'
(Signature Is required)
Representative
S'.am1f'_'
Signature.
~:":'~'$~.'J.f~:.3,,~".._'- ....-.
ature Is required)
Lot Size (dimensions) x
Land Area
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRlPTIO'N
Total Building floor area . . square feel
Existing . square feet
Feet Proposed " . square feet
Paved Impervious Area. square feet
No. of off-slreet.parking ~ages .
.-.,.
October 25~ 2002
.
Ct,,,,,,,, "JDity Development Department
. City of Stillwater. .
216 North Fourth Street. ..
Stillwater~ MN -55082: .
Dear Community Development Department of Stillwater
I have lived at the address listed below since April, 1987. I should receive some
kind of setback variance because: .
1. The very hilly and terraced nature of my lot makes complying with the 30 foot setback
too great a hardship. If I were to comply with the setback, I would not be able to enjoy
the buffering e,rect from the two noisy state highways nearby.
2. I would have to cut down a black walnut tree which has a base circumference of75
inches~as well as four other shade trees.
~~=e. have to remove part ofa ticldstone retaining wall with possible historical.
4. My view of the marina would be obstructed.
5. My security and privacy would be decreased instead of increased.
I would be happy to build a garage that would fit in with the historic feel of
StiIlwater~s neighborhoods. I feel confident that as reasonable people, we can come to a
fair agreement.
Thank you for your consideration.
. .~~.~celi, el.Y~. ... .~. . '.. .'. .
. ,. . ,,".. ,
. . - . . . . .
\:
Daniel ChaIleen
2103 Schulenberg
Stillwater, MN 55082
.
~' .
,
... . ., "1:: .. ~
1
I
I
. ..
: \ ,',;,' j;5'~;Je.'f'{J 5dk~ (''1
I ~ :oil,S ~- 160 L,JI
~. ~.. I' 2f'Jt. i..3~.. (n;UlO02) .... .'_ 0
. I -, )!!! ......- 8'}- 1utJ~) .'. I _, ~
~ 1 ~ too ~ 'J-;;("'a~e . / ".~ (_ _ .', (~.) (~r) -
(tJ 1'. 4 - .__ ..'. r _._
, , , 0
'f~ f!I'., 1 ~ :--- \ ~ Ff ';/4f\.t~llJ. fetbo.c..t:. At Iltla.(t:>t n;;:A/ 0) .
. ~ = ) '0 \ \.' r .' r- .
fP; ~~ -, .... .~) -O~ 0
'oJ 1;1p "\1 ~ -- L:
fclSt" ~~/V (_, \i __
'\ G: " I ._, \
. \ I I I l.,
, ,.......,. - f1 ... -. (. _-;:r-
EAST12~(A _ ) ~
( --- .' ',"-y V V 'f. \.-), (:
192 (. . t.". -"<J~ . i ( -
~ G50] , . ".};J~ ')..~ 6 ( 0
Go~J~~. ~()/ - ' ~
\, )
'1 \'. ..J
foo'ffl13)
: '-'
~ ~
~~
~
~
)
.
It,
f .
" .'
~
2 .
I
.1
'7.,
J
-..
--\
I'
. ))
)
. }. .
:. ~~
"._~.-- . '-.- '
....._~._-... ."""'-. -
, ,
"'-.
,.... "
-'172 +/-
,I
co
T'""
17E
;--
TRAC]:~
{oo'4lij
147.
14E
"
/.
,
,...1
/'
./
. ./~
"
.... " /".
.....
..j ..
145
(:--;..
\.....)
----
~
---
,,;-
;
\~... . a'
"'\
..'~
- ,
-'j -- -_J
II>,
1'1. "h-t
Location Map 3
- I I
.
---I
('t)
('t)
d
o
T'""
. ./L
y
. ,
;c::
(
I ,.'''_
, .
III ( ,
It:I,,, DV......
J~
'\'J'" '~'D'"
:t~:
:LJ:
Tml
Il::W JUt'" DV
Vicinity Map
I
,
,
1 . . '
-.G>-.
- f
.
o
44j
i
I
!
I
I
Scale In Feet
=...........:i=::..a
=-.:..-::..~..--
....-,.. illIIIIII'r._
---. "~........-- \
---
:=::~-:-~
.......... ..........
1
\)
I
I
I
o
~-~.;:- . J,'o
() ". !!A:.
'. ,"'"
0' - . "iT
Q .:s'
(ll.
o E
.~
_ i
J~i
I(
.~ 1,\
~ .
;, ~
! 'J I\i
. \('
,
,
,
.
I
I
.1
\"
. ~. \
:~ ,
..~
,~
~
:0
rLf
~~ f) pf
10
"-
\,
.~ ~'
~ ~.
I ". .
i " . :.!
j~ . \1,\
i " 'f;.~;~":~>j.:~-:f
~
,0
,
"j,4
, '~
~I,-
GAv'~j~
~ .
?fOr05e-~
~
.~
~-
-
...
./
....
l'
.
.r
"
. . ~
.
.
/-~
I
November 2, 2002
To the City of Stillwater, Planning Commission
216 N Fourth St., Stillwater, MN 55082
From Tony Kersc:bbaum.2017 ScImIOnbe.g ARey, Stil1water, MN
Re: Case SUB/02-76 and V/02-77
. . This letter is to ""Press my support fur the resubdivision and the variance requested by my
neighbor Dan ChaUeen. I have known him fur over ten years. He has SPOken with me
about the design, and I have seen the area Dan proposes to build his 88nl8e, and feel that
it is appropriate for our neighborhood.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Sincerely
.' .~,.,
/.,.
(/
w::-.
.
. ~~~"--;~;:~':, ;.
,~.... -" '" ..,....--
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW
CASE NO. SUP/89-22
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: March 13, 1989
~ROJECT LOCATION: 2103 Sch~lenberg, All~y .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISTRICT: Single Family
ZONING DISTRICT: RB Residential Duplex, Bluffland/Shoreland
APPLICANT1s NAME: Daniel Challeen
TYPE OF APPLICATION: Special Use ,Permit
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Request for a Special Use Permit for an electronic repair use in an existing
residence in the RB/Bluffland Shoreland District.
DISCUSSION:
The request requires a Special Use Permit because of its location in the
Duplex Residential District as well as the Bluffland/Shoreland District. The
proposal is to use two rooms of the existing structure for an electronic
repair service. Besides a two square foot sign and new two space customer
parking area, no other additions are propos~d.
As pointed out in the letter of application, the site is on the edge of a
residential area with Highway 95 on one side and a marina on the other. The
site is not visible from the St. Croix River and is not located within 100
feet of the river1s edge. The RB District use requirements allow services and
businesses as long as the business does not employ more than one non-resident
and if the use is not objectionable to the neighbors.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned.
FINDING:
The proposal, as conditioned, is consistent with the Comprehensive'Plan, RB
and Bluffland/Shoreland District requirements. '
CONDITlONSOF APPROVAL: .... . . ,r .,> J;_~. '.. '. .~ _. ' .
.1.Al1on-illuininated.twosqtiare foot sign"maY,bi installed ~onlthep,roperty:
aSshowl'l on the site-plan. '. '., .. ..
2. No employees other than the resident shall work in the business.
3. This use permit shall be reviewed for revocation by'the Planning
Commission if complaints regarding the use are received by the Community
Development Director. .
ATTACHMENT:
- Application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approval as conditioned.
~
.
.'
.
.
. .
..
. .
.
'.~~-':':'''''';'''''''''-;''''''~'..'A'_~::-'.....,.~I ..,.~ ~'!.~lW.""" ......11\: ""'_'_~."":'.~'''''_
. 6154t74
I . ._ ___ _ ____.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CITY OF STILLWATER
In th~:p;;:~;~g. c.s~
..Reque~ . ~
DANIEL CHALlEEN
CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL USE PROCEEDINGS
ORDER GRANTING SPECIAl
USE PERMIT
The above entitled matter came on to be heard before the City Council on the
4th day of April , 19 89, on a request for a
Spec1al Use Permlt pursuant to the City Code Tor true fOllowing described
property: .. " .. .... :-__._____~_____________.;..._________________
9021-1050
SECT-21 TWP-030 RANG-20
.15A PT GOV LOT 2
BEG 50 FT N OF
ALDER ST ON THE EXTENDED W LINE OF
LAKE ST THENCE N ON EXTENDED W
LINE OF LAKE ST 40 FT THENCE W PAR
TO ALDER ST 160 FTTHENCE. SPAR.
WITH SD EXTENDED W.~INE OF LAKE ST
40 FT THENCE E PAR WITH ALDER ST
160 FT TO IfEG. 3RD WAR!'
Purpose:
.. ....-.-----.-... '. .-.---------..-.
Electronic repair use in an existing residence.
Upon motion made and dUly approved by the requisite majority of the City
Council, it is ordered that a Special Use Penmit b~ granted upon the following
conditions: (If no conditions, state "Nonell.)
1. A non-illuminated two square foot sign maybe installed on the property
as shown on the site plan. .
2. No employees other than the resident shall work in the business.
3. This Use penm it , shall be reviewed for revocation by the Planning.
.Commission if complaints regarding the use are received by the
Community Development Director.
Dated this
/ j tI::
day of
~nem/~
H )-/ ~IJ/
I
, 19 r<1 _ .
Ok~lI!H/J.~
Mayor
~
f
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
December 27,2002
Resubdivision of Two Lots into One Lot. Case No. SUB/02-76.
v
Background. This item is a part of the previous appeal for the garage (Case No. V/02-77). ill
order to construct the garage, the site that the garage is located on will be combined with the
adjacent site where the house is located.
The lot resubdivision will result in a larger lot that meets lot size requirements for the district.
Recommendation: Approval.
.
Findings. The resubdivision is consistent with zoning lot size requirements.
Attachments: CPC Staffreport and minutes-of 12/8/02.
.
~,
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Planning Commission
Steve Russell, Community Develv!-,ment Director
. December 5,2002
Continue Hearing ofResubdivision Combination of Two Lots into One Lot
(Case No. SOO/02-76)
This item is related to the variance request for the garage setback. The applicant has indicated
that if the variance for the garage is not approved, this application will be withdrawn.
/ z ~1 -0 -"2
LP( J
f-{)
~
"
.
.
.
.. --< .,
> .
..
.
..
. .
.
.....-...
PLANNING APPLICATION RE'V~w FORM
CASE NO. SUB/02-76
tv.
Planning Commission Date: November 13, 2002
~roject Location~ 2103 Schulenberg Alley .
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: Dan Challeen
Type of Application: Resubdivision
Project Description: A resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2.
Discussion:
The request is to combine Lots 1 and 2 into one parcel of .33 acres (14211 square feet. The
applicant is planning to construct a garage on Lot 1. The ordinance for the RB Zoning District
does not permit a garage to be built on a parcel without a house.
. Recommendation:
Approval
Conditions of Approval:
1. A legal survey shall be filed at the County.
Findings:
The resubdivision meets the development regulations ~f the zoning and subdivision ordinances.
Attachments:
Application Form/Site PlanlLetter from Neighbor
-
.(.(lo
II (0/12-
f-9-D
,.v .
0/
~/1~
."/'
"
~NING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITYOFSn.LLWATER. , .
~16 NORTH FOURTH ~ I ,.tEet.
STitLWATER, MN 55082' .' .' '. .
,Case No: ~'~
Date Filed: A7~
Fee Paid: 6;C.
Receipt NO.~
ACTION REQUESTED FEES
SpectaUConditional Use Permit $50/2C
-Xvarjance ~:, ., ., -~2C
,XResubdiVi~ion QToij)
Subdivision* $1"00+!
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment. $500
Zoning Amendment* . $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $ 70
. ,
*An escrow fee Is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant Is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of aU forms and supporting mate.
submitted In connection with any application. AIl supporting matarial (I e., photos, sketches, etcJ
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material Is required. If application Is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies
supporting material /s required.
A site plan Is required with applications. Any Incomplete application or supporting material will d
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION , '.. .,
. AddresS ot PrOject;:(I03 Sd,wlUlb.f-,; ..sii/w...l.er Assesso"';Pa~1 NO~ODlO/tft1t!b e:l
. ., (GcO Code) ~,
Zoning District R B Descrlption of Project J;k;Ia.<-AJ ~"~ I'e.Su,bd,,- v iJ <
'. " fe> c~Jjnc. f;
- -fJ... t Y.Art d <;"6-{.6A.. uk..- .3.... f1 5 Ff s,-.fe W"; f..tf,....;. .
· tv bL ltSe4 as,p "'f-<- f.. ~"9'" &WId Tn It bm ~ Pl<-'J n e ~ J . .
1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewlt
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be bue and correct. I further r:ertlfy I will com!
the permit" It Is granted and used. II . .
Property OwnerJ)a JII. Cha..1l een... Representative S", WI""......
MaDIng Address ':VO 3 Sd1/.../ e-...h~
. . City-State-Zip.' SfjllW~fw .11r1'ss-o.[1:-: , :.-City-Sta
; 'Tej~Pho~lt!~~/3'a3 ;{'9Z8 ~~r;t~
*I ZtJ, 6.51 #V 30 3 810 HDt'lt..j!I1J~
Signature~ r:.>~ ./ Signature. .;S""""'~~ _ _.-
(Signature Is required) ature Is required)
LQt Size (dimensions) x
land Area
HeIght of Bundings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
. ,
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area . '$q" fe
Existing , square fee""
Feet Proposed \. . square feet
Paved Impervious Area, square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces .
I r17t+/~i'-
! ;. -' ~ _./
I t... .
... .'
! \ {:'. ~I ,t '/j5'5ik'1t<Id. 5dba.~ (-r)
1 '. . (If" '1'-) .,
I ~:oIl. S ~ . 160 L....r
-;i~' J 2f';tI~/t (O.;:roo02)..". . ._ 0
~ 1 ../t.'" ~ ~~..,... ; i,) \ \;It./~) i).. (' ~
(I~ .~ ~ AI,:.. _!4.iaje.. ~ - r) {-.' (-" _ .) C_r) -
t;' ~ J~o'\ \ rf~f"'~J~Af~'.tpiW g.
· t: \ (Zf~1V '(_~y "\U~) j;. g
\ 1.." G \ (')
.!-.---..-- -, ('---'
EAST12SC::A _ ) ER
JO
/
11 - " ,f:1-
location Map :J
II -
~
o ..
; "
~
~ to...
~
~
)
.
~
2 J (
J
. :\
.. .
r. 0",
\. -. 0 11
OJ 'j
,. :
.
'--..-
t;
.
,
.
1
.......
'1
/.
11:1'" _......
'mil 'D:lN
'''0; 0 ;S"Dl
:t~:
1:IN T.llIN
IC:W lal'" Il:IlW
Vicinity Map
.
~.
'. 0-... ... ~
o.
- ,
.
o
1\
, ))
, ,':)
. ] ..
:. _.,l
"'0_\;-.",-. '.____
.-. -
. .
. .
. .
. , 0
. . 0
. .
Scale In Feet
I '0
.1 III
=~~===
....,,_. . ..--- ~
( - ...---. .........:....
=--:...;,........
. . 1'1__
~ ...........
." - ......................
-.........- .
-- -.....
.-
-'"
co
T'"
17E
T~~
147.
14E
,,1 .
" 0 .,(t
.,//"
". /
. . 0
" "/'
145
,~-,...
\CJ.
-.-..-
~I
". .--
---------..
- . .'-. . 0'. (
(." 0/ Y V V 'f. \-0:).0.. . ( :
k A , I 0 ~ ._
".. .~- . ~':-1. ) (-. .
~:~1~)) ')/1:, J46 (~
- \"-'\ ~
1 " ~ .
v'
L-;o~13) ~
r .4-
-- V
192
-'t
f.
- ,
..
.-
November 211 2002
To the City of Stillwater II Planning Commission
216 N Fourth St.lI Stillwater II MN 55082
. .
". o.
......
.
. . .. .. ... ....
. . .pn;m Tony Kei'sc:hbaum, 2017 SchuJ~ Alley, Stillwater, MN
Re: Case SUB/02-76 and V/02-77
...This Jetter is. to ""Press my SlIpport for the resubdivision and the variance reqtJested by my
neighbor Dan ChaJJeen. I bave Imown"him for over ten)'ears. He has spoken with me
about the design, and I have seen the area Dan )lrO)lOses to build IUs 8lUlI8e, and feel that
it is appropriate for our neighborhood.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
c
Sincerely
....-
..
..'
(/
.
....
.'
. ..
.
I
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
A second variance is required because with the construction of the new garage,
the existing framed shed (accessory structure) is too large (12 square feet
maximum allowed) for an accessory structure in addition to the garage.
An electronic repair business I s currently approved for the residence. (SUP/89-
22). If the variances are approved, no business activity is allowed in the garage
or shed,
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to
approve the variance to construct a 24' x 28' garage with a 12 foot setback at 2103
Schulenberg Alley with the following condition:
1. Existing accessory structure must meet square footage requirements (not to
exceed 120 square feet).
Motion passed. 7 fore, 1 against.
Case No. SUB/02-76. A resubdivision of Lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres
located at 2103 Schulenberg Alley in theRB, Two Family Residential District. Dan
Challeen, applicant (continued from November 13, 2002 meeting).
This case is related to the variance request for the garage setback.
Motion made by Council Representative Zoller, seconded by Commissioner Middleton
to approve the resubdivision of lots 1 and 2 into one lot of .33 acres located at 2103
Schulenberg Alley with the following condition:
1. A legal survey shall be filed at the County.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-79.A variance to the front yard setback (30feetrequired,28 feet
requested) for the construction of a porch at1017 4th Avenue SouthintheRB, .
Two Family Residential District. Richard and Jane Christopher, applicants.
Ms. Christopher requested a variance to the front yard setback for the
construction of a porch. The porch would extend from the front edge of the
garage across the front of the house. There is an existing 6 foot by 8 foot shed
roof entryway that would be replaced. The front if the garage and the shed roof
entryway are located 28 feet from the front property line. The porch addition will
stay at the existing 28 foot setback from the property line.
4
..
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
December 27,2002
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Variance Setback.
V /02-86
cV
Case No.
Background: This item was heard by the Planning Commission on December 9, 2002. The
request is for a variance to the side yard setback to allow the subdivision of an existing lot into
two lots. The new subdivision lot line causes the variance situation.
On December 9,2002, the Planning Commission heard the request (minutes attached) and
reviewed the staff report with comments from the Building Official and City Engineer. A
neighbor was not present but submitted a letter indicating their concern for the subdivision.
.
After receiving a thorough presentation, the Commission discussed the program and approved
the request by a 5-3 vote. With the variance approval, the subdivision can be approved as
conforming with the zoning requirements for lot dimensions and size.
Recommendation: Decision on appeal.
Attachments: Letter of appeal dated 12/12/02, CPC staff report and minutes of 12/9/02 CPC
meeting.
.
December 12, 2002
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
On November 27, my wife and I received fi,um you a letter
notii)ing us of a request from Scott and Lisa Demars for a 'cudmCC
to the side yard setback and a '(admCC to the impervious Slua.ce
caused by an existing residence lot split located at 603 Churchill
Street West ill the RB, Two Family Resid~baI D~~;ct. Case No
V 102-86. The same letter notified us that the request would be
heard on Mo~day, December 9,2002.
It is my un~&~mnding that the Demars were &lanted their request
..~. for the variance on Deceinber 9. I would like this letter to be
int~~&I.,ied by you and the Stillwater City Councll as our appeal of
that December 9 decision. My wife and I are appealing the 6I-ant
of Variance No V/02-86 to permit a setback of3 ft instead of 5 ft
of Mr. DeMars \.f...a.I..,nt house. Our reasoning is threefold:
1. Such a \ .:ance would -..&~ a ~bstandard lot which
would allow the appli~l (Mr. DeMars) to "'A~ another
buildable lot.
2. City Planners on December 9 recommended denial to the
original request for a variance. Their recommendation
stated there "are not hardships jusdfying a \ (admce".
3. Building officials apparently were concerned about issues
of building and fire codes with the proposed variance and
city engineers were concerned abOut issues with drainage.
For the record, my wife and I are property owners of the lot
directly adjacent to the 603 West Churchill lot.
Sincerely,
John K. Ehlers
~ *,.~kv
Ernestine J. Ehlers
~~~
A
.
,
.
.
.
/
/ '
//'//
..............
J
.'\
, ,
P. .iJNING APPLICATION REVIEW F, :M
CASE NO. V/02-86
. Planning Commission Date: December 9,2002
Project Location: 603 Churchill Street West
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: Scott and Lisa DeMars
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a
variance to the impervious surface (30 percent allowed, 33.5 percent requested) caused by an existing
residence lot split proposal(see next case SUBj02-87 for the Subdivision request).
Discussion: The request is for a variance to the side yard setbackand a variance to the impervious lot
coverage. The applicant's have a large parcel of property and could legally split it into two 7500 square
foot lots. The need for a Variance arises with the setback requirements for the existing house and the
amount of impervious surface covering the lot after it's been subdivided. The existing house is built 3
feet from the new property line. 5 foot minimum is required in the RB District. This situation causes
issues in terms of building and fire codes, attached is a letter from the building official. There are also
.issues with drainage, attached is a letter from the city engineer. It appears there is no other way the lot
line can be drawn to ensure the existing house is within the required setbacks. This request would make
it difficult to infill a minimum size lot in the context of the neighborhood.
Recommendation: Denial
Conditions of Approval: Should the Commission grant approval, staff suggests the following conditions
of approval:
1. Must meet all building code regulations.
Findings:
1. That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner, exists. In this context,
personnel financial difficulties, loss of prospective profits.and neighboring violations are not hardships
justifying a variance.
2. That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity; and that a variance, if
granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
3. That the authorizing of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property and not
materially impair the purpose and intent of this title or the public interest nor adversely affect the
Comprehensive Plan.
~ttachments: Application form packet, memo from City Engineer, memo from Building Official and
.etter from neighbor.
CPC Action on 12/9/02: +5-3 approval
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
.
1. No more than 10 rental units shall be parked on the site at one time.
2. Landscaping around the U-Haul parking lot to be completed by 6/30/03. If
possible use taller trees for screening the northeast corner of the rental site.
3. No additional signage.
4. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-86. A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet
requested) and a variance to the impervious surface (30 percent allowed, 33.5
percent proposed) caused by an existing residence lot split located at 603
Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Scott and Lisa
DeMars, applicants. (See Case SUB/02-87 below.)
Mr. and Mrs. DeMars requested a variance to the side yard setback and a
variance to the impervious surface caused by an existing residence lot split
proposal.
Mr. and Mrs. DeMars have a large parcel of property and could legally split it into .
two 7,500 square foot lots. The need for the variance arises with the setback
requirements for the existing house and the amount of impervious surface
covering the lot after it's been subdivided. The existing house is built 3 feet from
the new property line. This situation causes issues in terms of building and fire
codes. It appears that there is no other way the lot line can be drawn to ensure
the existing house is within the required setbacks.
Commissioner Ranum did not feel comfortable approving the variances.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Wald to approve
the variance to the side yard setback and the impervious surface located at 603
Churchill Street with the following conditions:
1 . Must meet all building code regulations.
Motion passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. SUB/02-87. A subdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's
Addition, into two lots. Lot 1 - 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 - 7,511 square feet,
located at 603 Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Scott and Lisa DeMars, applicants.
.
8
.
.
.
.'-
.........,
!
"
1 !
.".,.,
2 !
! 6 !
....'
5
4 !
.".,.,
'<'
~1
,.
.......
li;
Iii
~
12! J:
..... "fO
~
~
>
so
..0- ....
b""'"
'"
'"
'"
....
o 0
CD
o
Z
<J
o
o
8 ~
~~ 10!
.............
!
11 ~
4J'013)
7 !!
.".,.,
so
so
so
I"
50
6 0
"~d.._~....'i~
p21 ------
2
50
.....'
!
2
!!
!!
............
... .....
-
,.
f-BO
W
w
0:::
t-
_ CI)
50
50
50 '
50
.,.
.~
!! 6 !
lI""'"
5
4 !!
.,.,."
!
""J
2!! 1
I po65)
,.."
.............
~J
9
~...,.
9 !! 10
....,
I
......'-'
t-
W
a::
0:::
<(
J:
!!
7 !!
p"
8 !
12
-'\:I
.......
I\~
60
50
50
50
o
'"
!!
50 ......'....50 ~ :E 0 .'V 50
t- '
~
" .~ WI~~
~1O" >: ~ .j
150 Ii! 7 100.14
50
50 50
...........
""
130
Ii!
300.38
J
REFERENCE LINE
.;--~
REFERENce LINE
Location Map
..........,.
.........
2 !!
PI)
3 !
..4-.... J---1"
..,.,.",
11
so
50
3
...........
",." l'!
.........,
!!
Ii!
ip007) ~
so
o
'"
_ 7
-,
f'
04
. f'
11 J
11 t
~ ./
f'
~ .j
33
5
-,
4
!~
3 . 2
--
3~,
31
30
143.8
29
*"'3)
14."'"
e 143.6
.pro)
143.6
143.7
F"
*"'" 11
12
143.8
t'flO731 13
_ ~ I' 28
........... ' 143.9
~ 143.9
~ ; 1~97, .B 14~~
~ f' 26 '" *"'<) 15
,./ 144 " 144
) ,;~J ".1:
12 !
.,.,.,J
50
o
'" t-
W
~O
t-
CI)
VII 2~"
~51)
50 50
.......,.
3 !!
*""J
~
......-
12
J-'~ ,,1-"""
11
50
~
150
~-Y~"""
150
50 I 50
1?;-4
/~L,: ,51i!!
r (0'50)
t I 8 pl'
.A-"""- .J.- ~
............
1- "'~~' .. 07!! ~~, 9!! 1~
5O~50......-r50 ;-.-f........~
50 20 30
'"
2
"106)
8
"109)
150
169.59 +,-
p"
170.38
...... ..,
*""
.""
W
11 CO
:2
o
()
...J
Ii 0
:c
5
.,"::' I
if
*""J
"4'
1:;' ~
. ..,. W
8 / ,>
1447 f'~ W
, Y i CI)
-~~:
11
*"""
\41./
1l
-,
144.1
*""J
~ f'
04
. f'
~ 4
23
I'
22_"./
I'
J
144.2
21
50
o
'"
~
'"
942
_f
o .j
. t
14<1;
:J
~.J ,~ i
~1031
:J
~
~ .J
25
"102}
144.4
24
144.5
23
*101)
~ f'
~.j
22
#1001
144.7
21
144.7
~
t
~./
2ix-oJ
144.8
19
~
144_8
18
*""J
144.9
:c
t-
81 ::::> pm , ./
g ~~./ t
___ :--1 i
/:1
F'"
t
$lao
.~
~
~..
u;
Ii
12.5
o
'"
f' -
- \
*,,,';
I'
4
WEST
1~ I~
*"''' 18" ~
144.1 "-
19 ~
pm Sii
~ ~
144.2 ~
so
j
9
'POSSI ~.
1
.........,.
f'
9
t ~
4 11
10 111
~
~
~
j--
~
~
11
1-
~
~
j-
143.7
143.8
~
J "
1 ~
(
~
~
~
~ .
Ii!
;+
ij
~
ij
~
ij
~
~
:c
t-
::::>
o
CI)
~
ij
*""
t-
W
t ~
i ~
ij
60
~
Ii
2
144.3
3
p"
t 0
oJ
PU8L1C ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC 8578e
100
2802
144.4
4
144.4
1
144.9
t
~ ~
13
145
14
-,
(
145
HANCOCK
Ii
Ii
t
4 AREAS
100 J
~
*"'"
Ii+
~
7i!
R1IW R2!)W RI9W
nm
nlN
nON
1"29N
'R22W R1IW R10W
Vicinity Map
o
163
Scale in Feet
OF
=~~~=::,,-:.g,
;:-~=::=~:.
==~'t=;-~YlltlOl
=~:~:r~unty~OJr"'-
PaR:.! dala lIMed on AS400 irIfanMlkIn
-~':.:ug==~~
Memorandutn
.
To: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
From: Klayton Eckles, Director of Public W orks /~
Date: December 5,2002
Subject: Engineering Issues Associated with Variances to Building Setback
With the large number of requests for variances to building setback requirements resulting in a
large number of approved variances, some background on engineering concerns is warranted.
Providing significant green space around building sites is important for the following reasons.
1. Drainage coming off of houses and driveways needs to run over land to a street or storm
sewer. When buildings become to close, it can become difficult or impossible to create a
drainage swale because of the elevations and lack of space.
2. The side yards often contain egress window wells, landscaping, walkways, storage areas
and roof overhangs that can hamper drainage and building accessibility. In new areas of the
city, 1 o feet is the typical setback to allow for all these factors. In older areas ofthe city, .
the setback is only 5 feet. There are many examples of lots with 5 feet setback where a
greater setback would have improved the situation. Often retaining walls and other artificial
means are necessary to make grade changes work between l-'J.Vl-'erties.
3. In front yard areas, setbacks are usually much greater. Still homes and porches that come
within 10 feet of the right of way can create problems with sidewalks, underground utilities,
and parking.
4. Allowing variances from setbacks also has the effect of creating larger building envelopes.
This results in increased impervious surface. Greater amounts of impervious surface lead to
increase in storm water runoff and overtaxing of the storm water system.
For all these reasons, engineering staff encourages planning review to take a very cautious
approach in allowing variances in setback and in impervious surface requirements. Engineering
department strongly urges that variances resulting in less than a 5-foot setback on the side yard
be avoided at all times. Front and rear yard setbacks are not as critical but can still lead to
problems with drainage and increased storm water runoff rates. Allowing homes to be built
close to road right of way invites problems for future construction activities as well as potential
future impacts to the household when traffic volumes or patterns change.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
FROM: Cindy Shilts, Building Official
DATE: April 1, 2002
SUBJECT: Variances Involving Building Code Issues
Recently, there have been numerous variance requests for setbacks to property lines for
residential construction of garages and living space, The building code regulates how a
building is constructed when within the allowed area specified. The building code sees
these issues as a fire/life-safety issue for neighboring properties.
.
The attached table from the Uniform Building Code lists, by occupancy, the proximity to
a property line with allowable openings and type of wall construction. For example, if
you look under the R-3 (residential living space) or the U-1 category (private garages),
openings are not permitted when the building is within three feet of the property line.
This means that these variance requests for one to three feet from the property lines
cannot have any windows or doors in the affected wall and the walls must be constructed
to the hourly rating as specified under the "bearing" and "nonbearing" columns, which
essentially increase the cost of construction. Basically, < a one-hour wall consists of 5/8"
fire resistant sheetrock, taped, or other approved materials to be determined by the
Building Official.
I believe the Planning Commission should have this basic knowledge of how the
variances, if granted, are affected by the building code. Property owners often assume
that they can build a "typical" garage and are surprised by the increased costs involved'
when a variance is granted close to a property line.
I will be at the April 8th meeting to answer any questions the may arise.
.
@~~~~\
\..~ ~ '1.\\\\'1.
~ ~~~~ ............
.-
..
0'<.... -
PUT IN FILE DECEMBER 20TH 2002
I Y-uf~
~
THE FOLLOWING FIVE PAGES OF INFORMATION WAS READ AT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING ON DECEMBER 9TH 2002 BY SCOTT P. DeMARS.
THIS SUPPORTIVE INFORMATION WHICH WAS USED TO PASS A VARIANCE
(CASE # V/02-86) AND PASS A SUBDIVISION (CASE # SUB/02-87)
BOTH PASSED WITH ACCEPTANCE BY STILLWAlhK CITY PLANNING COMMISION.
.
.i
.
~;,:
.
.
.
CONCERNING MRS. EHLERS LEllhR ON FILE
CONCERNING MR AND MRS EHLERS LETlhK ON FILE. THE POINT OF
SPLITTING OUR LOT HAS BEEN COMMUNICAlhV TO OUR NEIGHBORS IN AVERY
OPEN COURTEOUS FASHION WITH GREAT RESPECT TOW ARDTHERE
OWNER SHIP SINCE 1968. MR AND MRS.EHLER HAVE JUST RETIRED AND HAVE
SHOW GREAT INTEREST IN MOVING TO THERE CABIN HOME OR FLORIDA. WITH
IN Ih.rm:ONS TO SELL OR RENT THEIR HOME IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE.
WITH THIS IN M1NE SHE HAS STAlhV AND I QUOTE" YOU DO WHAT YOU WANT
WITH YOUR LAND JUST AS LONG AS I HAVE COMING TO ME WHAT IS MINE."
END QUOTE WE MAINTAIN A GOOD PEACEFUL RELATIONSHIP, AND WE HAVE A
GREAT RESPECT FOR THERE POSITION.
AS YOU SEE IN THEIR LETTER, THEY HAVE A MISUNDERSTANDING THAT THE
VARIANCE REQUEST M.I:'hCTS THERE SIDE OF THE LOT LINE HOWEVER AS YOU
CAN SEE THE VARIANCE "ONLY" M.I:'hCTS OUR LOT LINE(EAST SIDE OF LOT).
THEY UNDER STAND AND ARE WILLING TO ACCEPT A HOME BUILT ON THE
EMPTY LOT, AS STATED IN THERE LEllhR BUT RATHER MISUNDERSTAND OUR
VARIANCE REQUEST AND FUTURE INThNTIONS WITH LOT.
I DID NOT APPROACH THEM ON A CORRECTED UNDERSTANDING OF OUR
VARIANCE REQUEST, DUE TO MRS. EHLER'S MOTHERS DEATH LAST WEEK. BUT
I WILL TRY TO INFORM MR. EHLER WITH OUT CAUSING UNDUE STRESS ON HIS
Wl.l:".h EVEN IF IT MEANS WAITING TIL MThR THE HOLIDAYS.
AS YOU SEE IN THE PETITION IN THE BACK OF THE REQUEST I COULD EASILY
GET THE SUPPORT OF ALL NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA WITH ENOUGH TIME GIVEN.
THE EHLERS CONCERNS ARE P ARTL Y MISUNDERSTOOD YET UNDERSTANDABLE
AND RESPECTED.
FIRE CODE ISSUES
FIRE-LIFE AND SAJ:<ThY ISSUES
.
THE FIRE SAFETY ISSUES CAN BE ADDRESSED IN MANY WAYS WHICH MEET OR
EXCEED FIRE CODE STANDARD.
As shown in initial proposed site plan, exlnbit A- THIS WAS SHOWN TO MEET MINIMUM
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. WITH CONCERNS OVER FIRE/SAFETY CODE WE HAVE
2 NEW PROPOSED SITE PLANS WHICH ADD GREAlbK FIRE SAFETY.
AS PRESENTED EXIDBITS A-I AND A-2 REVISED PROPOSED SITE PLANS CAN
CREATE INCREASED SET BACK DISTANCES BETWEEN HOMES OF 16' ON EAST
SIDE OF NEW HOUSE AND 26' BETWEEN HOMES ON THE WEST SIDE OF NEW
HOUSE.
OR A SITE PROPOSAL IN A-2 OF SETBACK DISTANCES BETWEEN HOMES OF 21
FEET TOTAL ON EAST SIDE AND 21 FEET TOTAL ON WEST SIDE OF NEW HOME.
IN A MEETING WITH BillLDING INSPECTOR JOHN BUCKLEY TODAY HE STAl'hV
THAT THERE WOULD BE "NO" FIRE CODE ISSUES CONCERNING NEW PROPOSED
SITE PLANS, WHICH WOULD MEET OR EXCEED FIRE -LIFE-SAFETY ISSUES. AND
SAW NO REASONS WHICH WOULD PREVENT US FROM MEETING FIRE CODES
ABOVE AND BEYOND 5 FEET SETBACKS WITH NEW REVISED SITE PLANS .
AS STATED IN A MEMO FROM BUILDING OFFICIAL CINDY SIDLTS SHE STATES A
NEED FOR FIRE PROTECTION WHEN VARIANCES OF 3 FEET OR LESS ARE BEING
REQUESTED. WE ARE PROPOSING TO HAVE A SITE PLAN RESTRICTION PLAchU
UPON TInS VARIANCE AND WILL BillLD NEW HOME WITH MAXIMUM SETBACKS
AS STAlhV PREVIOUSLY AND SHOWN ON NEW SITE PLANS A-I AND A-2
. ~
OUR ABILITY TO EXCEED FIRE SAFETY CODE IN THE OPINION OF JOHN BUCKEY
MAKES OUR SETBACK VARIANCE ISSUE AND PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS EASILY
ACmEV ABLE CONCERNING SETBACK CODES AND FIRE ISSUES.
.
.
.
.
CONCERNING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RUN OFF
ADDRESSING A MEMO FROM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CONCERNING
SETBACKS AND DRAINAGE ISSUES.
CONCERNING POINTS #1 AND 2 INKLA YTON ECKLES MEMO
WE HAVE INCREASED SETBACKS AS IN NEW PROPOSED SITE PLANS EXHIBIT A-I
AND A-2 WIllCH ALLOW AMPLE SW ALE DRAINAGE BETWEEN NEW HOME AND
EXISTING HOUSE ON EACH SIDE.
CONCERNING POINT #3 OF FRONT YARD SETBACKS WE WILL EXCEEDING THE
STREET RIGHT AWAY BY 20 FEET OR GREAlhK AS TO CREATE A UNIFORM
SETBACK WITH EXISTING HOMES THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED WHEN SUBDIVISION
IS GRANTED
CONCERNING POINT #4 OF MEMO AND ADDRESSING OUR NEED FOR A VARIANCE
TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF LOT. UNDER CURRENT (RB) ZONING THIS LOT
CAN BE A TWO FAMILY HOME -DUPLEX. COVERAGE CAN BE 40% OF TOTAL LOT
WIllCH IS 15,021 SQ FEET, THIS IS 6000 SQ FT OF IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE ruST AS
THE LOT SITS RIGHT NOW-COMBINED! OUR PROPOSAL TO SPLIT LOTS WILL
LEGALLY DROP IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE TO 30% OF EACH LOT WIllCH WOULD
BE 4500 SQ FT MAXIMUM TOTAL BOTH LOTS. . OUR PROPOSED SITE PLANS A-I
AND A-2 WOULD CREATE COMBINED DOUBLE LOT COVERAGE TOTALS OF
EITHER 4433 SQ FT ON EXHIBIT A-lOR 4584 SQ FT ON A-2 WIllCH IS FAR BELOW
THE 6000 SQ FT CURRENTLY USABLE AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AS THE LOT SITS
RIGHT NOW.
I HAVE SPOKEN TO TIM MOORE, STILL W AlhK SENIOR ENGINEERING
TECHNICIAN AND JOHN JUREK WHO SUt't'LIED ME WITH A COPY OF AREA STORM
SEWER MAPPING. THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 1 HAS A STORM DRAINAGE
CATCH BASIN LOCATED AND IN THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IS LOCATED
A SECOND CATCH BASIN. AS SHOWN IN STORM SEWER MAP THESE BASIN ARE
ON THE BEGINNING OF A STORM SEWER SYSTEM. PLEASE NOTE THAT
HOLCOMBE WILL HA VESTORM SEWER AND CURB IMPROVEMENTS NEXT SPRING
TIM MOORE MADE A COl\1MENT THAT IN MY SITUATION IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
IS NOT AN ISSUE BECAUSE THERE ARE AMPLE STORM SEWER BASINS
AVAILABLE WITH IN PROXIMITY OF LOT.
THERE At't'hARS TO BE AMPLE W AlhK DRAINAGE AND SW ALE GRADING
SETBACKS TO MAKE THIS PROJECT FAR EX('FFO MINIMUMS CONCERNING
DRAINAGE ISSUES
IN SUMMARY
.
WE HAVE PRESENT A PROPOSAL IN GOOD FAITH AND GOOD CHARACTER.
WE ARE WILLING TO GO THE EXTRA MILE TO FIT IN WITH THE STILL WATER
. ..
HOUSING THEME WITH OUR SITE AND HOME PROPOSAL. WE HOPE THE en y OF
STILL W Al.I:.K CAN USE OUR "CRAFTSMAN STYLE FOUR SQUARE" IN FILL PROJECT
AS A STANDARD TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING
NEIGHBORHOODS.
I HAVE NOT ATTHIS TIME BROUGHT UP THE ISSUE OF SUBDMSION OF LOT
BASED ON THE FACT THAT PLANNING STAFF "WOULD" RECOMMEND APPROVAL
BASED ON OUR HOUSE BEING WITH IN A 5 FOOT SET BACK MINIMUM." AS
STATED IN REVIEW FORM. . ONCE SETBACKS ARE ADDRESSED SUBDIVISION
WOULD BE GRANTED
OUR PROPOSAL WILL EX('FFD FIRE SMTbY SET BACK ISSUES AND EXCEED THE
NEED FOR DRAINAGE SETBA.CKS AND 1~:ERIOlJS COVERAGE.
AS STATED BY JOHN BUCKEL Y HE SEE'S NO IMPEDIMENTS TO FIRE CODE
SETBACK ISSUES WITH NEW SITE PROPOSALS. WHICH CAN EASILY EX('FFO FIRE
SETBACK CODES
AS STATED BY TIM MOORE CONCERNING IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE, HE SEE'S IT
AS A NONE ISSUE WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF NEAR BY STORM SEWER DRAINS.
WITH THE ADDED FACT THAT HOLCOMB ST. WILL HAVE IMPROVEMENTS NEXT
YEAR TO THE ENnKE STREET INCLUDING STORM SEWER AND CURB.
.
GRANTING THE VARIANCE IS THE BEST SOLUTION TO SPLITTING OUR LOTS AS
OTHER POSSffilLITIES WHICH WE HAVE RESEARCHED ONLY CREATE MORE
CHALLENGING RESTRICTIONS.
OUR ADDRESS TO HARDSHIP CONCERNS ARE SIMPLY STATED IN VARIANCE
REVIEW FORM AS STATED IN FINDING, POINT #2
"THAT A VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF
SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POSSESSED BY "OTHER" PROPERnbS IN THE
SAME DISTRICT AND IN THE SAME VICINITY: AND THAT A VARIANCE, IF
GRANTED WOULD NOT CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL PRIVILEGE TO US NOT ALREADY
ENJOYED BY OUR CLOSE NEIGHBORS AND STILL W Alb.K COMMUNITY.
WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE CITY TO BUILD OUR
PROPOSAL NOW AND IN THE MANY YEARS TO COME.
THIS WILL BE MY MAIN FOCUS AND PROJECT FOR THE COMING SPRING OF 2003 .
.
SUPPORTING POINTS
I-CONCERNING FIRE CODE ISSUES IN LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD. MY NEIGHBOR
JOHN EHLER'S LETlhR AGAINST SUPPORTING A VARIANCE HAS HIMSELF IN
1983 SEE(BUILDING PERMIT) WAS ISSUED A PERMIT TO BUILD AN ADDITION
WITH NO VARIANCE WInCH WAS 12 INCHES FROM LOT AND 7 FEET TOTAL FROM
HIS NEIGHBORS HOME WITH A WINDOW IN THE SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WInCH
VIOLATED 1983 CODE CONCERNING FIRE ISSUES AND NO V ARIANCE WAS
ISSUED. HE WANTS DENIED TO ME THAT WInCH HE HAS ENJOYED HIMSELF.
AS STATED PREVIOUSLY HE HAS INThNTIONS OF SELLING OR RENTING HIS
HOME. I MET WITH HIM LAST SPRING AND REVIEWED RENTAL AGREEMENTS
WITH HIM AND IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS HE HAS SHARED WITH ME HIS
CURRENT HOME MARKET VALUE GIVEN BY LOCAL REAL ESTATE MARKET
ANALYSIS WITH INTh.NTIONS OF POSSffiLE SALE OR RENTAL
2-MINIMUM SET BACKS WITH IN THE LOCAL AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION
SUPPORT OUR POSITION BEYOND THE :MINIMUMS OF CODE.
MULTIPLE EXAMPLE SUCH AS THE TWO HOMES IN FILL LOTS ON GREELEL Y
STREET AND THE POTENTIAL IN FILL ON SOUTH MARTHA STREET. INCLUDING
LffiERTY SETBACKS OF LESS THEN 7' AND DETACHED TOWN HOMES USING LESS
. THEN 5 FOOT SET BACKS (SEE ADDRESS LISTINGS)
3-CONCERNING SAFETY ISSUES WITH DRIVEWAY OUR NEIGHBOR AT 521
CHURCFTT J, HAS A DRIVEWAY 55 FT FROM STOP SIGN AND OUR PROPOSAL
WOULD MEET OR ExrFFO THIS DISTANCE TO INSURE PUBLIC SAFETY. CITY
ENGINEERING HAVE NO SET :MINIMUMS EXCEPT THAT WInCH ALLOWS THE
GREATEST SAFETY
4-COVERAGE VIOLATIONS IN 2001 OUR NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH 916 HOLCOMBE
BillLT A GARAGE OF 832 SQ FT AND HIS SINGLE LEVEL HOME IS ONLY 682 SQ FT .
WInCH IS IN COVERAGE VIOLATIONS OF ACCESSORY BUILDING NOT TO EXCEED
MAIN STRUCTURE.
5-IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE OF A BillLDING AND CONCRETE PARKING LOT ON
GREELEY AND THE END OF CURVE CREST BY FAR EXCEEDS MAXIMUM
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PERMIIThD
. WE HAVE COVERED THESE POINTS ONLY TO SHOW OUR THOROUGHNESS.
~ ;
December 4, 20\12
.
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Russell:
On November 27, 2002, my wife and I received from
you a letter informing us of a request from Scott and Lisa
DeMars for a variance to the side yard setback(S feet
required, 3 feet requested) and a variance to the impervious
surface (30 percent allowed, 33.5 percent allowed) caused
by an existing lot split located at 603 Churchill Street in the
RB, Two Family Residential District. Case No. V/02-86.
We were informed in the same letter that the planning
commission will be considering this case at a public. .
hearing on Monday, December 9,2002. We had intended to
attend this meeting in -light of us owning the lot directly
,.)adjacent to the 603 Churchill Lot. However, we were
informed this evening by phone that my wife's 9S year old
mother passed away in New Bedford, Massachusetts and
obviously must attend family matters there.
Which brings me to the point of this letter. I would like
you to share the contents of this letter with the planning
commission. My wife and! are adamently OPPOSED to
these variances being !;iGllted. Such variances would
litterally fill the 50 ft. wide lot full of a building. We also
trust that the city of Stillwater has some good reasons for
having a S ft setback to begin with. Only In special
circtm).)~ces should this variaoce ever be changed. This
.
, I,
.
.
.
,..---
i .
'.
is not such a circumstance. We have been looking at an
empty lot there since we bought our place in 1968. Filling
the lot with a big house will be bard enough to
take.. ..having one built within 3 feet of our property line is
simply not acceptable to us.
Thank you for sharing our conc"...~ with the planning
commission on December 9.
S~~Y.
~~. .~.:c.L9.~
John K. Ehlers Ernestine J. Ehl~.l.)
611 West Churchill St.
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
ieAkl' i
r : "lllla" ~er
~ ~ "- - ~
-..: -\ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA . J
.
December 25, 2002
RE: VARIANCE
Dear Property Owner:
The City Council of the City of Stillwater has received an appeal of the Planning
Commission decision on a request from Scott and Lisa DeMars for a variance to the side
yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet requested) and a variance to the impervious
surface (30 percent allowed, 33.5 percent proposed) caused by an existing residence lot
split located at 603 Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Case No. V /02-86.
The City Council will be considering this case at a public hearing on Tuesday, January 7, .
2003 at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Stillwater City Hall, 216 North Fourth Street.
If you have any comments or concerns regarding this request, please attend the
meeting.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
.
CITY HAll: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
.
. ~I
.'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STillWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STillWATER, MN 55082
Case No:
Date Filed:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.:
V n1R~,
ACTION REQUESTED
FEES
~Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
,7"variance $70/200
~Resubdivision $100
Subdivision* $100+501l0t
~ Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
~Zoning Amendment* $300
~Planning Unit Development * $500
~ Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay th
application process.
~\ ~'
~...~
. Address of Project &03 W. ~ur('J\J (l b+.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
, Assessor's Parcel No....a3 03 D 2-D2..l DO S',
(GEO Code)
Zoning District e..'2- Description of Project .~f'Da,rtt.+e_ Lb+ t tt vv1 Lot- 2 BIle..')
,
ffi( {I.nVY'\ b(.-~ .Md. (~' o~ ~'ld-...~ r +0 k?~..t..t lol (' f~ R-SyY)6if) 2- Sf-o ('~
"1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply witt
the permit if it is granted and used. " .
Property Owner Y A) tt.. (). V\tf. U~ Df ),(ar:s
Mailing Address (J()~ W. Cku,r'"'cirv'U SL.
City - State - Zip~l(uh.krl. MAl S-S'b<52.
Telephone No. (lJS/) 4:~<?14
Signature~ P. & ~
...,..e.(Signature is required) (Signature Is required)
uil-rr (PG1f-~53-~1/b .
. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
..'.... ',Lot Size (dimenSi,OnS) ~ x 'Sb Total Building floor area ;2.5D') square feet
"Land Area Ie:; '''DO t:if (+) Existing square feet
t :JHeight of Buildings: Stories Feet Proposed square feet
Principal \.5" Paved Impervious Area 3~3 square feet
Accessory I No. of off-street parking spaces l/ - s
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12, 2002
Representative
Mailing Address
~\~
City - State - Zip
Telephone No,
Signature
Contents of ProDosal
.
. Outline of proposal
. Photos of property in question
. Certificate of Survey with future home sketched in
. Certificate of Survey
. Photos of neighboring home that also encroaches setbacks
. Rendering of proposed Four Square house plans
. Photos comparing the vacant lot vs. the future home on the lot
. .
Photos showing that the new home fits the "Stillwater Theme"
. Photos of Scott DeMars' prior construction projects
. Reference letter from the building inspector of Oak Park Heights
. Petition of support signed by the neighbors
. Property information from Washington County
(." .'
~.
.
.,r:>
..
.
.
Outline for Proposed Lot Split at 603 W. Churchill St. Stillwater
We currently live at 603 W. Churchill Street, legal description Lots 1 and 2 Block 9 Holcombes
Addition, and would like to legally split the lots in order to build a 1920's Craftsman styled Four
Square for ourselves, while maintaining the existing home as a rental property. Both lots are 50 X
150 and would satisfy the 7500 sq. ft. minimum required for a buildable lot. However, once the
lots are split, the existing home will encroach the minimum side yard setback by less then 3 ft.,
and will exceed maximum lot coverage by 3.5% (256 sq ft.).
We are requesting a 3 ft. side yard setback variance and a 3.5% over maximum coverage variance
in order to legally separate Lot 1 and Lot 2 so we can build our new home.
The variances should be granted for the following reasons:
1. The new lot line would only directly effect our properties, see Exhibit A
2. The new home would be built far enough from the lot line to maintain a minimum of 10 feet
between the two homes, see Exhibit A.
3. The new home and garage were strategically chosen so we can keep the existing trees,
including 2 beautiful maple trees, see Exhibit A.
4. The new driveway would run adjacent to the neighbor's existing driveway, see Exhibit A.
5. The property was originally designed as separate lots, see Exhibit B.
6. The old shed and the concrete patio will be removed to provide more yard for the existing
home and to reduce the amount of impervious square footage.
7. The immediate neighbors have similar sized lots and one of them, 611 Churchill, is also
encroaching the minimum side yard setback, see Exhibit C.
8. The new home would be designed with a detached garage, meant to fit into the Ho.1combe
Addition, see Exhibit D.
9, The proposed Four Square plan would look better than the vacant lot, see Exlubit E.
10. The new home would fit the "Stillwater Theme", as there are many other Four Square homes
in Stillwater, see Exhibit F.
11. Scott DeMars has been in construction for over 20 years and his craftsmanship and attention
to detail are impeccable, see Exhibit G and attached referrance letter from the building
inspector from Oak Park Heights.
12. The neighbors are in support of the proposed project, see attached petition.
Thank you for your time and attention to this request.
RVf ~~~
t/'~~{~#' ~.eJ.{~
Scott and Lisa DeMars .
603 Churchill Street West
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(651) 430-0814 Home
(651) 253-2746 Lisa's Cell
.
.
The requested variance pertains to 603 W. Churchill
603 W. Churchill St.
Lots 1 & 2 Block 9
611 W. Churchill St.
Lot 3 Block 9
.
""....
Notes: CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY
o Ind. 113774 iron pipe set. BARRETT M. STACK
. Ind. mon, found as noted.
Bearing system is assumed datum. STILLWATER, MINN. 55081
Offsets shown to existing structures are MINNESOTA REGISTERED.
meas. to the outside building wall line, LAND SURVEYOR
unless shown or noted otherwise. T~.No.439-5630
Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on
or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction
with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon.
Overall parcel contains 15021 sq. ft., more or less.
SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR, Scott and Lisa DeMars, 603 West Churchill St., Stillwater, MN 55082
.
DESCRIPTION, As Supplied By Client: (copy of Doc. No. 994826,. Wash~ Co. records)
lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcomb's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota.
CH(/~C#/~~
~4J = ~t:!.Pd /",t;,Er .e/d.~
~~ ~.
.J.. ,- -- NB""zP'Jt::I'e ,II?'. h"if?./~ -- ,
~(.t;I.N.c.'{,.'~ :?-:--:;;~~~.7.~.:;'-.~: :~;~iiC:~.~ .~ -:- r~~'!'/..~~.:. ,~.~i~.
Ilr/~",."r '- Y~'d.Z'!. - .".........., ..... ,'~ "',
1 I' 'ltD."" u: ~ ~ ... I
I, I'll ;.Z)&, :::" ~ I
I k ~I .Ns:
~.... 1\"'\\"""'\' "'" """''\.-
~~I ~.:
:1:, ~~ i H",,$.~d3 ~~ 7.1
~ ., -\ ~~
~ I ~ 2 5rt7Rr
~ ~ · /' ,e.t9t"? F
~n;-' ~ ~ ~:- #4?vfF
,I ~
~ ~ ~
i~ :
~ ~ _,;;r!_
4 ~'q
, -- Z'l,,'t.
4It"'~"
"",,\...,
\ '
. ~:
\ Cl !I: ,
\ ~ ~,
\ \It'
, '
"IN ~1"'\~
" I. '''' ..
I. " ., ~ ~ I" to. F'm b~I." t: I ~
I '!.. 4,2'Z.1I,,, I'
, \ J't IN'" tJ,'fw. \ ~ I t.:
''-'o~1 t " rt1 . ~-'i..-::jl
/' ~.._- "',/.... "F. "..,,,,,, ....",
FII#I."'" I ,..... - - - $'4, "'7 -- - - '--- !Ft:!. "'7 - - - -// I hCrcbr ccnlfy tbat thll IUrv,y, plan, or "purl WII
/;':'"'tJ. '~- .s8~tlZP'r8"W /0'1. /&?t1I./4 - - ~.. i.m...Ju~.r'~:r:'=~:=~b:~;~J
.L1. ~./dd tM~
,,~ ,!.,'..., ... ~ . .Cl ~, ~ "~1 ... .....Jl.f..r...~....,..........
, !..!..~!!:..'=-.!..~l'('l~-F- ~ .L:!.?iJ,--
""~"',. ~. ~, ~/.t!._~_~t bI..IIIAIIIIII.1I14,,"IQallll....,Nalll..UAIIIIII1IIIIII11
u
""I
"I'
~.
n pl/Zot.
~ I~
Z#"H~ I:)
2 7$'1" .~,ti ~
~
~
~.
~
.1\
~
1
"
I !Se/2~"T
I ~API.&
,~
I ~ /101
~ '
~ .... 14-,f
...."
,~
I I
I
~
~
I
I
~.
~
~
<,
:...
~
.~
ST:
N
(I)
.
\
, :r~. ~a:. ",.. , .
'><'-"',,",104 ~->,l
\ WA~ ~NIT2' ~
~ (' TI7'Y""19 ,
, '
~"'''' ",', ",,-'\.\.', I.'
I
I.
~
. ~
~h
~'i
~
......
~ S
~ ~
~ ~
\J ~
~ \3
~ \I
~~
#.
L "r ~/ 1i1L~..fE..
"""""'''.-'./:4 -
\ . I
'~ ~
~ : ~ ~ ~
,GIII!"'tU ~ \j ~ ~
\ ' ~
~'-,\...." \.. ,,,'" ,-,' -8" ..
~
I
I
~
.'
.-
Pd.eTII
/"=ZP'
.
,
-
Notes: CERTIFICA TE OF SURVEY
o Ind. #13774 Iron pipe set.
. Ind. mon, found as noted,
Bearing system Is assumed datum. STILLWATER, MINN, SS082
Offsets shown to existing structures are MINNESOTA REGISTERED
.s. to the' outside building wall line, LANDSURVIYOR
ess. shown or noted otherwise. T....No.439-5630
derground.or overhead public or private utilities, on
or adjacent the parcels, were not located In conjunction
with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon.
Overall parcel contains 15021 sq. ft., more or less.
SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR. Scott and Lisa DeMars, 603 West Churchill St., Stillwater, MN 55082
BARRETT M. STACK
DESCRIPTION. As Supplied By Client: . (copy of Doc. No. 994826, Wash. Co. !'ecords)
Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcomb's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota.
CNti/C"c # /~L.
4-'t ~"'" = t:.:7. dd /"L:"4!'T .e "'d.:7
-1. :' --/VB~"Z~'JP'e /''''h:?~,/~__ __',
y..;-"t'::.j.-:-': :"",,::"::-;:~~'(70.7.:.: :": 'f;~-:7~rp~,~~.(~~~ ':~~:' ~'>i:1:
r/'I~t....,.~1 'l',...z.t,-' ........... ... ~ ....,
'I' "" I :~.,/j.ll.' ~!:; ,,:' I
., .-'. 4'. I ........ I
I,.!u IO.~S': -0 ,
~. ~jS~: : I rl ~ 5~"\""\'\' '''''''''':
.. I. j f I'll ~':;'.7''i1 ~ ~ ~
~ '[j' J: .~ I """'(,\1,......".". UJ h".:7. ~. Cd3 ~....- 7./
~ '~~I -r~25rPRr
, '" ~ J F"""-'t2b. \0', r..e~F
I '77 ~ ~ 1. I '" 2.groe.~ ~ /7ft>lYf&
'/~ ~ 1 M H<oItSr;. ~'~ v'
~ ~~. u. I ~,: I
~ I " I
~ ~~ : ,I .:~ r~(Z:~~~2";~ ~~
~ ~ -'~.r!'7 5 -.-". iT , T'1P/e;f~), ~ ~
L r"lh~L f \, ~,,;
....J. r 6'1'."H'{_j Q.. pl. IZ." \,' " ,,,', ..,~, ,., ~. "'
, ... - %"&'1 - ~.
!! 'I L ~T :! /. 75//~...ar
"'I 5' -I%.- I zrH~ % \\"\'''''\\''''-'''l--
I f:\ \ .,
'~~I ~. !s0. LIJT Z 7F1,,~j1: ~ ~ :~ ~ ~
~ ~.' I \.?X ,G/9.eHt!U '~l: ~
~'A;;u I ~ ;. ~~, ~
\~'. ~ ~~ 1701 """""".-11., -- ~
~ "" 'EN7,ct' .)
" ... i ~ I~'\,-,,~, "~'~ / To elS. :
': ~ t : ~ ~ ~ fl.~'Y.OvG<1>.
~ ~ I 1l~..........I/'
(~ I~J/~'''''' \
I ~ ~ ~ ~ . '"
I ..:: ~. t'" . r,. """I.P. ~ I~
"" ",UN,..' I~
, \ J't I ,N" Dol''''' \ ,f J I::
'''''~f "\~IJ..-'" J'{+
... ~-.rp",- ", - .;..', '.r. _'T.7f"" '" /- ~
"~.<"~,-I ,......, --- tr"'..:77 -- - -'" '---F.:7..:77 __ _-"/'"
r_. m - '" I hercb)l certify ehae chi. IUrvcy. plan, IIr rCl'urc WII
tJ1.8fs., t '-:-- S89"Z!''r8''W H. /t?t::1./4 - - -- rrcpared by me or undcr my dlrCcclupervllionand lhal
I ~ 4,""'iJ, 1m I dull! R~ Land Surveyor under ehe law. or
.L!.. -e, /~.:7 lhc~ccor MI .,.. .' A .
~~ :...~, .- ,-") ..of.c:.J ,.' _ /Az .... ......IJ.(P...~..,..,.....,...
~ !-!....jL~-L:~p~ ~ _.i'~~
.a A " Dac....Augult..Z.1.,..ZDDL.....Rcl.No...J,3~7.fl.................
"''''''1'' ~. A-t.4,'t:tPtt1?
u
..57:
\~
.
~
V)
~ ~
~ ~
a ~
~ \3
~\I
,~
~
......
I
I
"
.'
......
."
H41.erH
/"=ZtJ'
Notllll CEATIFICA TE OF SURVEY I)(L.LJAI
o Ind. 113774 iron pipe set. BARRETTM.STACK 1iIa' rT ,.,1
· Ind. mon, found as noted. A
Bearing system is assumed datum. STILLWATER,MINN. 55082 . _I
Offsets shown to existing structures are MINNESOTA RICISTlKED
meas. to the outside building wall line, LAND SURVIVOR
unless shown or noted otherwise. Tel. No, 439-5630 .
. Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on
or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction
with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon.
Overall parcel contains 15021 sq. ft., more or less.
SURVEV~ADEEXCLUSIVELVFORI Scott and Lisa DeMars, 603 West Churchill St., Sti~lwater, MN 55082
DESCRJP~ONI As Supplied By Client: (copy of Doc. No. 994826, Wash. Co. records)
~ ~ l.t, 1 .od 2. .1." " Holoomb', Additi" to Still....,. ",hi,.... ,,"",y, 'i..."to,
CHVRCH/LL
~a.I = t:d.Pd reET
4-'t
-1 ,- --Na""Z"'Jd';': /'?:/"?.:7./~-- ,
l:~..t;"...~c:t:: :--::-,,-~:~~:~.7.::,-.:;:.<.~: :'..: '~(.f::.. ~c:: ~ ~ (P~:f.~.~~..~:~;;w.-";;<:.\1.:
r ....,7~.......'3... ~~"'-dZ'" .-.--.. .....-- .~....
I, "-'- t"- '\
I I' F"I>~ ..../. D ~ ~ ... I
I' . ~ ~":1f .To 16.41:::: ~ I
I ~ ~I I ---"--- ;",\\'\""'\\""'''',\''
I.M, r...;-....' .
~jj 101 :1-"2.." _ I~' 'i, . ~
, :.: ! fi'... M!. C~3 ,
~ L J::i I ~ '~':t ."'" 7./
~ : ~ ~ ~: .::~~s~ ~b \' ~ 2 5rol17,pf"
~ ':ii U \ . I, /""e".p~E
, ~ ~ '" ~ i \-\t\M~ '
'"77/ ~ R ;:S::1 I () ~""';' /n?~fE
;' ~ \-",.:r
;' Iii._ " ::5A.
~ ' '2(.2: IL i
~ ' . I
~~~~!
l'-:, '. I '_ 10'10 %
~ ~---/&.r_-.' \ \ <r
; \; \ '
~ {..+. z1.&1-.D
s ,.~~S--~
""I ~V" ~ rrHA/U
"I ~ 11 L ' to 2 79" ~./r.
~ "-l I ":~ '/.-,t>~
~ I ~;;LE
~
1'1
~
I
I
E".,.cr.
'\"'~\
'I,
~ Ii' tc-
~ ~ '1;;: 1(~ovra>
IS
/ ~,,,,,' '"
I~ ~
~ "
~ ~.. '" 2051/o)2f Fm J'8"I.p. ~ ~
'92-4 .oil r::.e..VIOlIsj! 'OJ i. "33.5 ~ :.Z>. II. "I Itt IIII?L1"."
\ \ J't 2-5' b2 "'(, I ~ .If uJ. \ ~ I ..: "
'-...\ ,1 (. I 2"1J~~t-.-I . II .~/ J~ /"=2(), ,
\.i;.: ~ ",Jr,
/'~..._- --';"'-",' ',__"T. ""...vr."''''..../ I .
FN~ ~")q I '\ - - - f;"...,p7 -- - - -- f;"t?,p7 - - - -",/ I hereby certify that thil lurvey. plan, or report Waf
".BU..J -..,. _ S8f1"Z'f''r8''W . ~ /~.:7,/4- - - ~ - rrepared by me or under my dlrcctlupervlllon and that.
il iI./H iJ. 'am a dull' Relllllercd Land Surveyor under the lawl of
,oS> L! ~~_ '.'_ ,~) ,,,; .Cl ::.~(1,p /~1" _ ~~~:JUr...~......,........
~ !-!...~-=-.:-~. ~"'::....z. -C"'.:'~~_
.p,&" 7' ~. t!-!.~. :tl b f!.12 Date...August..2.1.,..2002......RcS,No..,137.7.It.....,..:m.....
u
, 141
1': /.&.(1
, I
%
~
~
~
~
I ~
I ~ 17.7
~,
oJ ..... /f,'i
K~
~
I
I
..
'-
~
~
,)
"
..
'"
\~
"If
" "-
,n
S'T.
"e /4<:) .
"".
<J)
.
,
I.. Im. L<<. ""
~"'''"'D4 4/~ ~
I, w...~ .&JN4'/' ~
~ ('T_~/) ,
I, I,
\""",,\\ .",' 8.4
I
I.
~
.~
~,
~'i
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
\.i ~
~ \)
c;:s"
~~
.....
~
L~r ~/ 75/1 ~I'r.
,\\\"'\"''\''r8.,~ --
, ,t!o ~
, \ R ~ ~
,GA.e./NU ,~~ ,~
, '~
~ ~ ~ ~
".'.': "",' ,,' "-8.3 -- Q
~
I
I
~
..'
....
.
:o;::~ 113774 iron pipe set. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 6.'AffJ,&,r
· Ind. mon, found as noted. BARRETT M. STACK . A
Bearing system is assumed datum. STILLWATER, MINN. 55082 t. .
O'flotl Ihown to 1lC1Itlna ItructUl'1I are MINNIIO'A IIGIITIIl.ID till
meas. to the outside bUilding wall line, LANDSURVIYOR
unless shown or noted otherwise. Tel. No. 439-5630
Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on
or adjacent the parcels, were not located In conjunction
with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon.
Overall parcel contains 15021 sQ. ft., more or less.
SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR, Scott and Lisa DeMars, 603 West Churchill St., Stillwater, MN 55082
DESCRIPTIONI As Supplied 8y Client: (copy of Doc. No. 994826, Wash. Co. records)
Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcomb's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota.
.
CHI//eC#/~L
~a.' = t:t?,~. t? '/"&~r
~'t
-1. ,,--NBl'''Z~'Jd'~ /''''h:'It?/~__ __',
{';-".o.ic.'.t.:-~:-c::-~:~~~.77~ :':.'f;-.6.~~ ~ ~ rt:1~t~.~~,~.:~~--;.~.
If ,..:-t.~..,.;,.P..J'+ I i '~:z:-:;-"" -'" ........ .~~....
1/ I "F",,,. ,",,: iI' .. v, - ": .. 'I
I NI ".z,"~. I.I? I '::: ~ iii
I . !II O.48s;' I :;l..\.'? ... I
I ~~I i A ,~""",\\"""",,~
h.j~I,I-----;'-" .
J j j 6" T u. -, 191 : .: ~
I I ' ,;, \ ! _hip. /W. &"<::'3 ,
1 . ~, ~ . '....... 7.,
} -j .- I h<opost:b I ^ ~ ~ .
~ I.~ FlA:tlAu' ~X;;--ry 2 5;-:~~ ,
~n; ~ ~ ~ \i'l>.-l-\~ ;.,., ':-- h{:?Pfr '.
. ~ ~ I~ ~;,
~ ' ,ZI,t ~ ; ~
~ '~- \ Z;p. La:. "F
,. : I ~&7P",1D4 4~~ ~
~ ' . I 51 L_.__ I~ I ! \ NA"L ~,1N"'/7 .
~; ... ' 10"/0 J2f - \ CTf?'/C-'f4/ '
'l :-/&~-) . : ~~: '}tC'J ~ ~
....<,(. I 6? ~~ J '.l.(J ~"'\\\.,\, ...,,' 8"
I -- Z9.&'t. ;s 01 I I' :>.
, OJ. J} I .J. ~ L or ~ I 7~11 ~"-
"'I Z1NHAI'l:I. ,(, I:l 'I' \\\"""\"':-8./~ --
I'. 5 I;! "'1.. \ .
"I ~ lie LIJ'" 2 7F1~"',f~ i ~ \ : ~!u ~
~ t>.) I! ~ , !! fUl14{l(~-. ~ G;?,e.l16E ,'~ s ,~
~ /Z" ~Q: , '" ~
.. I ""A,Pt.& .... !1N ~I lI. " 'J N
" .. ,d.;ll ~ , \ ~ "
I:;' ~ ZIb"... I" /7.7 .",,,,'''''....,..1 -- ~
~:"\ . ~,(S ;;:-
~ ~ 4K1A~ v1
III .. "' I+.~ "''''''/ I
I " ~ '~~~' '"fo e-C I
I t ~" lJ~e~t>
~ \{. 1 ",I \r-
~ .. I /(~ ~ ..
"111/ . ~.\,\,'.
~ S ;z..lTlp .LA1pa.v104sA ~ Jr.] . 2.!5/b JZI' ~
I ;2.,.,,"1 ..~-__... .H ~ ~;3.S'2- Jz"':.~.I.p. ~ I I~
, \ J't .+v& .,. -r-N'" D./h). \ ) I /..
......\~~ _ ~o~'t. ~:I ~-IJ-"")~
~ ~ 41141 PP """ 'rr. p",;:;:;r- ""1 ~
/. ,"",,-__ ----/. """--- -- ---,/" .
F"~~'JN " F<? t?7 fi"p. &77 "I hereby ccrtlfy chac chi, ,uf\lcy. plan, or rCI,urc was
D.~rSo.} -..,. - S89"Z~'r8'W oM. /(/Jt:1./4- - - -... rrepared by me .or under my direcr 'Ur. '.:~n and thac
/ t7 .4'1 W. &to am a duly R.tered Land Survcyor under the laws of
- .LL "'"', Nt? th~~.
\.~ tot:, ,") '_of = ~ '.N /~., " ""... .....Jt:(,...~...............
~ !..!.....';.ll..-,:.!.:/q.;:".,z" L"..=-'!:::":...-
;P,e",r ~. ~. 4/tft?~.9
tv:
.$7:
.e /dO
~
V)
I
I.
~
~~
~~
~'i
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~~
,~
......
.I
r
~
.~
,,'"
. .
A!p,erH
/"=2P'
.
Dacc...AuguSt.,2.1.,..200Z.,....Rcll.No...13Z7.4. ................
3x "li.)it C
. Immediate neighbors have similar lot sizes, and 611 W. Churchill St. is
encroaching the side yard setback.
611 W. Churchill St.
.
.
Front View
615 W. Churchill St.
Rear View
Please note the concrete curb/fence is the lot line
Exhibit D
Proposed Craftsman Four Square Plan
THE WOODLAND is of the type of
architecture that meets with favor
wherever it is built. Besides having
nine rooms, it is planned with a large
front porch, 26 feet wide by over 8 feet deep.
A study of the picture reveals many at-
tractive features-the wide steps leading to
the porch, the triple columns on either side
of the porch, supporting an ornamental
truss for the porch roof. All rafter ends
on porch and main roof have exposed ends.
The front windows have divided upper lights.
The two front windows on the second story
arc provided with flower boxes. Even
the dormer adds to the symmetry of a
harmonious design that is difficult to im-
prove. Being planned on strict-
ly square lines, every foot of [ .
floor space is utilized to advan- ,
tage and the upkeep is small. .
C.n be built on . lot 32 feet wide. $TOOP
, (c~~: t I P~TRY ] -==-- -
I ~ ;)HnV(:)~ ,-_...
· \ K ITCHCN : TA&Lt
DINlNq 1200M I 1 t-s'I Id.t L.__. n
II J.-'
(1 .'t)
1 DINING r
II 1". TA&l[ h r--I
")"::1'~ iE
It-S' l 1'2:-o'! ~
~ -~,~----~
or. :..~ C4)[0 OP(NINj.
~ ,~. G-r.._ ..
~ :~j -i-"
__J ~ ,I
n ITVINC o.OOM ~ : :
n 1"oS I 14'-2." e: I ReCePTION HALt
a~ .s I ~ It-S'llt'-S'
~ I~
ilDiVtil1Oiil{ ~
: - ~---:OR~:-O' -
~__ ... ,,,.._~:'::.,:L~
~
I~lmfl
'J!..eCWoodland
No. P3025 "Alrfuzdy Cut" and Fitted
~49~
\&(0 11l'""""'-~lf~r~ J..., ==-:\&D~'
',I @I "I
B R. " cr: Be ROOM
1~"'l~ ri iJ gf I IJO' '10~2'
" \. tI. .i~ ,,/ ~\
..._-~ .'-----r "'-___
FIRST FLOOR
The Llvlnc R_m. The front door. gla~ed with a
large light. and with sash on either side. makes an Im-
!lOsing entrance. and furni~hes plenty of sunshine and
air to the large reception hall. 12 feet 5 inches by 11 feet
5 Inches. In which is located the stairway to the second
floor. As a wiele cased opening Is provided between
this hall and the living room. which Is 12 feet 5 Inches
by 14 feet 2 Inches. the combined space gives the ap-
pearance of one large living room. thus allowing
sufficient room for furniture. Including piano.
The Dlnlnc Room. Size. 12 feet 5 Inches by 12 fret
6 Inches. Is directly back of the living room. It Is con-
ne4;ted by a large cased opening. thus throwing the three
rooms into one. when the occasion warrants It, Here Is
Space for buffet or china closet, with plenty of room for
table and chairs. There is also a closet for linen. etCo
The Kitchen. It Is directly to the right of dining
room. permits a handy arrangcment of rangc. sink and
work table. and connects with large pantry In the rear.
and hallway to thc reception hall In front,
A closet. 8 feet 4 Inchcs br. 5 feet 4 Inches. Is located
direct!). olf the first floor hal, This room can be used
for lavatory, iewing room or closet.
A stairway. dlrect'y under the main stairway. leads
to the basement..
.."..
~~
II BED ~0Qtv1
"lO~o;~;:il'
;~:
~[O "'OJ
0-
I 1\ &to /i 1 &to '
t B~D\~M Bj~\~~ll
Id.~' "10-7' 5 IC?:~ 110~7' .
L_~ "-___.:l
~ _-~~ -i
~ ~
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Po.ch C.lllnc. .Clear DOlllllas Fir or P"cUic Coast Hem,
Ioc:k;
Flnl.hlnc Lum"',
Hlch C..d. Mlllwo.k <oee pqe. 110 ..... 111);
Int..lo. 000'" Five Croaa Panel DesllP1 or DOIlllIu Fir;
TrI.... Beautirul Gralza Dolllllas Fir or Yellow Plnei
MocIlcln. C...,
Window.. CalUorala Clear White Pine;
40-Lb. BuJldlne P.po., S.ah W.lchtal
Ea... T.ouc" .nd Down Spout I
Chlc.co Dealcn H....w... <oee Plllle 132):
Punt (0. Three Coat. Outalde Trim and Sid"":
St.ln (or Two Bruab Coat. (or ShlnRle. on Donner Wall.:
Sh.lI.e .nd V........ for Interior Trim and 000";
Complete PI...o and Spedllcatlon.. .
Built Oil coucrete 10llll4atlon and excavated unde
houle.
We lUarantce eaough material to buUd lbl. hou... Price
doe. Ilot IAclllde CllImoat.. brlcJc or pla.ter.
See delCrlptloa of "Hoaor BUt" Hou... OA P.... 12
and 13.
OPTIONS
SM#' 1'1IIl,. .. 1'1IIl,.II',",", '0 IllIu 'M PIIJU qf IW04
"'.. 1111.00 ..".. S.,." 109,
0rlnII0' MPMI, ,""'11'14'1 1Il/W0"'," 11 ".". ''''140'' "
wroo4 ,II'.,,,,. IJS.fID.. rIJ.
00 DNr,. Tria ou ,,-, lor "u"iota 11411,1/111", _..
.U ",..'':} _: 11110 00" SIII/". M.pII l"D/If" /..
....... . h'..... 1101 J)() 111"..
II
1
SECOND FLOOR
The Bed. . . ....... The stairway leads to hall on second
floor. that has direct connection with five bedrooms
and bath. There arc four clothes closets on this lloor.
The B...ment. Excavated basement with concrete
floor. Room for furnace. laundry and storage.
H.I.ht of Celli..... Firat floor. " feet from floor to
ceiling. Second floor. 8 feet 2 Inches from floor to
celllng. Basement. 7 feet from Boor to joist.
What Our Price Includ..
At thi pfl,e lIuot.4 w. will fu.nlah .IIJh. m.te.lal
to build thl. nl"...oom hou... 00",1. ne 0"
Lumb." L.th,
Rooflne. Bllt Grade'Clear Red Ced.r Shln,ltI:
Sldln.. elrs, CfPreaa or Clear Red Ceda" B..rl:
~,__ "-__ .._.I ""_'_~_~___ .AA...... .
.
Exhi )it E
603 - 615 W. Churchill St. as they look today.
603 - 615 W. Churchill St with proposed future home.
EX~1i-- )it F
Four Square Homes within 1/2 mile of the subject property.
.
j
~ --'1....
~
.J,
-- ----::.,'1.,.
"~
.t4
~~
.
Exhi~)it G
.
Renovation projects and new construction by Scott and Lisa DeMars
603 w. Churchill St.
Before therenovation
15033 65th St.
Before the renovation
. '.':: '-<:';:.c--r '.' .,.' _ 'L~l-:" ::'~! 'I' '..",
~ . '-'. ' - .....' . . ..," ...... -.
1<' . _:"' ~ _~ .... 0.". + . ".. ',' --..',\
,~~~- :...., ....-.;... .;;. '-PI J.'-",,'.L,
12192 Parade Ave. N.
Built in 1992
603 W. Churchill St.
After the rennovation
15033 65th St.
After the renovation
, ,- .-.-
".'-'__~- . ~ ~-:~~1:~~j , _.
.-
8749 Lake Jane Trl.
Built in 1995
November 20, 2002 .
REFERENCE LETTbR
To whom it may concern:
I have inspected Scott P. DeMars craftmanship and skills in the construction and rehab
of projects he has worked on. His workmanship is above requirements of code and his work is
done in a timely manner. I understand he is applying for a variance at 603 Churchill st. for the
purpose of constructing a new 2-story craftsman style home. This letter is in regards to his fine
craftsmanship, scheduling and good character.
Oak Park Heights Building Inspector
?;;-2~
0:..
.
.
e
.
:.
.
LOT SPLIT - 603 CHURCHILL S1REET
Request for support for lot split proposed by Scott and Lisa DeMars
The following neighbors of Stillwater understand Scott and Lisa
dedication to the improvement of the Stillwater area neighborhood.
By witnessing the improvements of 603 Churchill over the years
Their neighbor's would like to show their support by signing this
petition. They are aware that any home built on the vacant lot in
the future would be restricted to a "small 1920's styled four square
home" to fit in with the character of the neighborhood.
The under signed below have NO legal binding with their signiture's
this is only a petition of neighborhood approval. This petition is to be
presented to Stillwater planning commision for lot split of Churchill
street propcdy.
~LiL 4:Y -U2/Yld -1J.. (/aJ e ~~-'--{.-LI;! Au-L. ~, /.2:.,. J-r;.1t1LL)c.LtiC
~.; ~~~MN W &.:,.(J~ ':J.f
~ nJ~~ Q-1~~r 5/3 \,.j, ~\('!'\I'LL Jt .sil'L L\N"At~1\
-0:<~b -J~{ ~tfl\~I:; -( r.[~~-re^_
~ f);Jt;-- S-o~ ch.(.irr;h~i1 ~~J. w
~;~~~ \.;\ ~ c; \ "- W C\-\~,n.: ........u... 'v...) "'~IVU .:s<:){)~'<-
.-)4.t.~- j _.\ ~ ~z.1 iJi'./~1 t'j/ttf:-U!Il.<r .5'1'w. S)"Z) 9 h-
iX U/-YL;"d}?' , /.." ~ .:;1_ . J;)(~!dJJ.I!-,A-M1<21 '1JW~
~~ L\A.,C)a'''4''JA... 10<':' \^_L Ck""Y' '_kd \ <;t ~ ef+, \ \ \~J" 4.l~N- ';~0'62
\' ~"'" ().~.(~ 7/!J- l{.J, C~~Jf.5rf !
\ ~v ~.,,~~. -1/,5' 1/).. ~t!.A;P~, ~a)d4l!/.{~Il'
'. ~ 'J.4r1 W C.f:.u~c44/ r7.,..- ,€fJ/fu>ti';'~
(' !"t~.. '1L~ i;J I C'hL'dJA-iU, ....<;h) ~~
~ 1I.1Jl'O_O-f ~i Q ~ f}- 1 ,\ I
_.~ ~:-T~~~~~t-<-Jtv\.~ q/~ s. }-t~~,
~ ,A-e,ll ~ :~.:\ Ak;' . (" 1 ~ \).~ . . &ut. ~~, I L..l T
i':~/ q" 5 ff.c/cp", /:, <- ~-r
LOT SPLIT - 603 CHURClllLL STREET
.
Request for support for lot split proposed by Scott and Lisa DeMars
The following neighbors of Stillwater understand Scott and Lisa
dedication to the improvement of the Stillwater area neighborhood.
By witnessing the improvements of 603 Churchill over the years
Their neighbor's would like to show their support by signing this
petition. They are aware that any home built on the vacant lot in
the future would be restricted to a "small 1920's styled four square
home" to fit in with the character of the neighborhood.
The under signed below have NO legal binding with their signiture's
this is only a petition of neighborhood approval. This petition is to be
presented to Stillwater planning commision for lot split of Churchill
street property. .
.~-4f . 917 If" ft~~ ~- 2:>.. S\i I L-J.e.-
~hE>1\:~~'- )1.1'. ~~I(~ s+ 5 ~){~/~'I...
.Jf</~<J-~Aj!~~!--,/ ~ 6~_ .~<?~J~
/ _.... ( /(,'Y c.1 tZ:k(,l.,~-:& ~? ~r.
~~Wt~' ~ A^:- II~ ~t1t~;I~:'~-st-. '.
l~, . s. -f,Jl:bmk ~
.' ~~2?f~~ .' (, 6 ? .._~/:.~ ?'~.~~-~
. .(;..../7 ....-..1; l~i . (if /0/ /r" ~ c~/lllJ-rS:;J.n :5'/
~:w (f:~1~' dJt ~~;;-/~~~rx--
~.(L~ y;~At5~.A q2l ~ &/-J;O
~ ~. 'U.8 ~~. f.{.c...w-7~ ~..f ~.J,.r\ U w~ ~Qr
~/- &J-'- q,.6 5. N-/1./7~/.JU-. " -
.__..I1"L-("J~~.~ u,ID l~) (~Jl~/C-h(,ll,\MLI)~ .
(;7' k..__ ,~.p::____06?- w. (11v-f (/.../ f 5r.
CZ\Juv - VVl:CSIHUglUfl \"-UUllly - rlU}JI;;HY 1aAl;;;:) -1'a.)' 1UU111UP"lLJ laA
J.U5""" J. VJ...,
.o.
..
WASHINGTON COUNTY . -' ,:,." ',-
.. ,K~Jl COi'bId. PiOK:tor'.,ASfiQSsment, r4)lpayer Services ilnd EJQctions_ '
,.
powered by ,I. ;, /gOV,."
Review Your Property Information
This page reflects the information currently available in the county's system,
Any prior payments made through this site will be reflected within 3-4 business
days.
Identification Information
Parcel Number: 3303020210057
Property Type: R
Municipality: STILLWATER
CITY
School District: STILLWATER
ISD 834
Address Information
Property 603 CHURCHILL ST W
Address: STILLWATER MN 55082-
0000
Billing 00000-0000
Address:
Watershed
District:
Escrow Information
Escrow 1:
Escrow 2:
Primary Taxpayer
Owner: SCOTT P DEMARS
Co-Owner:
Address: 603 CHURCHILL ST W
STILLWATER MN 55082-
0000
.
SeclTwp/Rn or Lot/Block/Plat and Tax Legal Description
001 009 HOLCOMBE'S ADD LOTS 1 & 2 009 HOLCOMBE'S ADD TO
STILLWATER FIRST WARD
Classification Homestead
Classification: RES 1 UNIT Homestead: NON-HOMESTEAD
Foundation
Building Style: Year Built: Garage: Squ. Ft.:
STORY & 1/2 1876 1697
Prior Year
Sale Date: Sale Price: Unpaid: Acreage:
02/29/1992 $ 82,500.00 .34
2001 Estimated Market Value(s) Tax Payable 2002
Estimated M rkt
Land $45,000.00 Total Due: $ 2,314.00
Est. Mrkt Bldg $145,100,00 Paid To Date: $ 2,314,00
Est. Mrkt Machine $0.00
Total Est. Mrkt Payment Status: Paid in full
{. Value $190,100.00 Last Updated: 11/2012002
Est. Mrkt "Green
Acre" $0.00
Plat Deferral $0.00
This Old House $0.00
https://washington.mn,ezgov.comlezproperty /detaiI.j sp?ezPropertyld=3 303020210057
11/20/02
LLUV ~ - ". U'>U1U,!:),"Vl1 ,-",VU.U.L) - J. J.Vp'-'l L) J. C,4d\."'':> - J."J .J. v....... .l. ..Vf-"....,.. ft..} .I. t".4..i'l.
Taxable Market
Value
$184,700.00
Special Assessment
Total Special
Assessment
$42.00
Installments:
Installment 1-Taxes and Assessments
Installment 2-Taxes and Assessments
'~'
.. ".""'"
.....,'H'F
There is no tax due at this time. If
you have further questions about
this account, please contact the
agency.
Due Date:
05/15/2002
10/15/2002
Total Due
, -01 Back I
Amount
Due:
$.00
$.00
$.00
For a detailed breakdown Or payoff on Special Assessments, please contact the appropriate
Municipality. For more general information regarding assessments, contact Taxpayer Services at 651-
430-6175 or 1-800-927-4829.
Copyright 2000-2001 EzGov and Washington County. All rights reserved. Privacv Policv
https:/lwashington.mn.ezgov.comlezproperty /detail.jsp?ezProperty Id=3 303020210057
... -0..... - v.. -
.
.
.
11120/02
/
33-030-20-21-0057
Page
08/12/02
3:53:57
2003 Appraisal Plus
1 of
1 Req By: BARRY_STABER
SCOTT DEMARS
603 W CHURCHILL ST
LOTS 1 & 2
.'~MBE'S ADD TO STILLWATER
'r WARD
Model
Building Use
Shape Modifier
Quali ty
Roof Structure
Roof Cover
Exterior Wall-l
Exterior Wall-2
Foundation
Heating Fuel
Heating
Air Condition
Electric
Plumbing
Basement Adj.
Bsmt. Fin
Interior Fin 1
Trim
Window
Flooring - 1
Flooring - 2
Kitchen Appeal
No of Bathrooms
Bedrooms
Fireplace
Actual Year BIt
Eff. Year Built
Physical Deprc
Functional Obs.
Economic Obs.
e,=,.a Physical
ection Type
01
0105
B
70
03
03
04
00
09
01
05
01
01
03
02
0000
05
01
01
12
14
1
IH
04
1876
1982
03
000000
000000
000000
EX
STILLWATER MN 55082
rl Si te Address: 000603 W CHURCHILL ST h
SFR I ,11 I In , I Land Value
STORY & 1/21 I I I 'Mise Value
IRREGULAR I I I I IB1dg Value
7.0 GRADE I I 16 I I Total Value
GABLE OR HI I I I I Ivalue By CAMA
ASPH/COMP S I I I 28 I
STE/ALU/VINI 34EP(284) I I
N/A I I I ONE(854) I I
STONE 1 I I CRWL I I
Natural Gas I I 18! I
HOT WATER I I I L9-, I
NONE, I I I I IRCN
100 AMP CIRI : I 13 13 1% Depreciatfon
Average I 110NE(44) 7 I IOBSOL
1/2 Basemen I I CRWL 1-14 I Building Value
No I Y I I
DRYWALL I 25 OHS(49S) I I I BOOK
Softwood I I BSMF 190TQ(3C4)9 I
Double Hung I 1 I BSMF I I
HARDWOOD I I rl I I
CARPETING I L-15----l L-IG I I PERMIT NO
Standard I AREA FLAT EFF% E/AREA ACT% A/AREA EA/M HEATED 198 834
1 1/2 BATH I 198 520
04 BEDROOMSIBSMF 799 0.00 0 1.00 799 0 799112175
IOTQ 304 1.68 511 1.00 304 511 304 I Appraiser
ICRWL 898 0.00 0 1.00 898 0 IAppr Date
lONE 898 1.00 898 1.00 898 898 8981Use Code
1/2% YEAR IEP 284 0.00 0 1.00 284 0 INSKO
1**Additional Subareas Exist, See Draw Summary Sereen**1
I BSMF;OTQ (U19L2CRWL;ONE (U13L9U28L18EP(LI1D34R6U18R5U16 ) I
I D16L5D18R18D7R14) L14BSMF;OHS (U7L20CRWL;ONE (L4DIIR4Ull) 1
EXTERIOR INID25R15UIR5U17)D19R16j I
I 1
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
, I
PAGE DATE QS
0798 HU
0292 Q
50,000
22,600
171,500
244,100
191,613
0.1050
0.0000
171,500
SALE PRICE
75,008
82,500
TYPE DATE AMOUNT
RL 1198 10,000
RE 0898 1,000
NS 0496 15,000
JL03 JASON LANGER 2003
04/23/02
0105 STORY 1/2 HOUSE
15.00 STILLWATER C
LI00 MI00 BI00
History Values
Tax Year Total Appraised Value
02 208,700
01 190,100
00 170,200
MISC BLOG CODE
1 1 0100
2 1 OUO
3 1 0500
DESC
Residential Gara
SECONDARY GARAGE
ENCLOSED PORCH
LENGTH WIDTH UNITS l>.DJ PRICE EYB DT PCT ADJUSTMENT
22.00 24.00 528.00 18.26 1982 HF 10.50 1.00
12.00 22.00 264.00 .12.76 1970 HF 16.50 1.00
.00 .00 284,00 . 44.00 1982 HF 10.50 1.00
UNITS TP PRICE -----..----.....- ADJUSTMENT CODE/FACTOR --------------
1.00 L 50000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00
LAND LUSE DESC ZONING
1 0020 RESIDENTIAL LOT Rl
L 1.00
.)
VALUE
8,600
2,800
U,200
VALUE
50,000
,.
.
.
.
Outline for Citv Council MeetiBf!
Initial Variance ReQuest
Scott and Lisa DeMars, owners of 603 Churchill St., Lots I and 2 Block 9 Holcombe's Addition,
requested a variance on the existing home on their property, so they could divide the two lots
with the intent of building a Craftsman Style Four Square home on the vacant lot. The variance
was needed because the new lot line would be within the 5' minimum required side-yard set-back
from the existing home. Please note that the new home can be built within all current building
codes and set-back requirements. They also needed a variance for impervious square footage of
the existing home which exceeds the code by 3.5%.
AOOfoval was l!iven bv the Planniruz Cc:mnnission on December 9.2002.
After a thorough discussion, we were able to show that
~ The proposed home could be built at a distance from both adjacent homes that would
meet or exceed the current fire codes (see exhibits A-I and A-2).
~ The impervious coverage is a non-issue, as there are 2 storm sewers adjacent to our
property, (refer to file details).
~ We satisfy Minnesota State Statutes definition of hardship by meeting all needed criteria of
reasonable use, unique circumstances, and character of locality.
The Aooeal
Mr & Mrs. Ehler's letter is requesting an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision of
acceptance and approval of our variance. The Ehler's appeal states three possible concerns. All
three ofthese concerns were addressed in great detail at the Planning Commission meeting with
multiple solutions which meet or exceed city code standards.
Concern # I was the creation of a "substandard lot". This is a misunderstanding. As the
Planning Commission and the City Council can see, both lots in and of themselves meet or
exceed standards set forth by the city code. As referenced from a memo written by Steve
Russell, "With the variance approva~ the subdivision can be approved as conforming with the
zoning requirements for lot dimensions and size." (Please reference written detailed
presentation, lot survey and memo in file.)
Concern #2 was lack of justified hardship. This issue was addressed and overcome at the
planning meeting, and in the "Findings" on the original Planning Staff Application Review Form
which state: "That a hardship peculiar to the property, not created by any act of the owner,
exists," and "That a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same vicinity; and that
a variance, if granted, would not constitute a special privilege of the recipient not already enjoyed
by his neighbors," and "That the authorizing ofthe variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property... nor adversely affect the comprehensive plan." The Planning Commission sets
a high standard to be met concerning hardship, as does the Minnesota State Statutes, which
clearly put forth a test which must be met. We have shown that we satisfy the Statutes' definition
of hardship by meeting all needed criteria of reasonable use, unique circumstances, character of
locality.
Concern #3 pertained to fire code and drainage issues. These concerns were also discussed in
great detail at the Planning Commission meeting. As stated earlier, the new home can be
positioned on the lot so as to allow a maximum distance between homes that meets or exceeds the
current building codes, and there are 2 storm sewers adjacent to our lot which dismiss the
impervious surface issue. (Please reference written detailed presentation on file, and Exhibits A-I
and A-2.)
.
.
.
The Subdivision ReQuest
The subdivision of our 2 lots is based on the approval of our variance request. As stated in the
original letter from the Planning Staff, the subdivision would be approved if existing home was
within 5 foot side-yard set-back, or if the variance was granted. Our lot split and home proposal
fit in with the "Stillwater Theme." In fact we would have been willing to comply with any
conditions regarding building styles set forth by the Planning Commission to ensure this point, so
as to improve the image of our neighborhoods as we are proposing to do here.
Additional Facts Rel!ardinl! the Ehlers
On December 4th, the Ehlers sent a letter to the City Planner expressing their opposition to our
variance. Their letter stated, "We have been looking at an \:..u'-P~y lot there since we bought our
place in 1968. Filling the lot with a big house will be hard enough to take...having one built
within 3 feet of our property line is simply not acceptable to us." This is another
misunderstanding. Please note that the variance concerns the lot line between our home and our
vacant lot, not the Ehler's lot line, and that the proposed new house is only 26' wide. This letter
was placed in our file and was thoroughly addressed at the planning commission meeting. (please
refer to letter on file. The proposed set backs and house dimensions are shown in Exhibits A-I
and A-2)
The Ehlers have known us since we purchased 603 Churchill in 1998 as a HUD house. It took us
a year to renovate the house, and we rented it out to a family in 1999. Knowing my history with
rental property and the housing market, the Ehlers have on occasion asked for my opinions on
these subjects. Last summer they mentioned that they might be interested in renting out their
house, so I spent a couple of hours reviewing rental agreement forms with them. Also, within the
last six months, Mr. Ehlers has shared with me his home's market valuation given by local real
estate agent's with intentions of possible sale or rental of his home.
In Sumrnarv
This variance has been reviewed in great detail by the Planning Commission, and approved as
proposed with no conditions. We have confirmed their decision here tonight by showing that we
can position the new home to meet all current codes, that impervious square footage is a non-
issue in this case, that we meet the criteria for undue hardship, and we have a petition signed by
33 neighbors in support of our lot split. Unfortunately, this appears to have become an issue of
Mrs. Ehlers and her "VISUAL OWNERSIDP" of our lot, and not our rights as property owners,
This proposal is offered in good faith to benefit the neighborhood by the prospect of building a
home designed with the character and style to fit the "Stillwater Theme."
,
.
.
.
--'
THIS IS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT TO BE PRESENTED FORMALLY
On the evening of December 18th, Mr. Ehlers came over to our home for nearly an hour and
conveyed his sympathies for our position. Once again we talked of our proposal to build and I
gave him an outline of all my options to cUl1,'ently use the empty lot with or without a variance so
he could explain to his wife our current land use rights. At this meeting Mr. Ehlers made this
statement in front of my wife and me twice.
**(here is a statement and quote that you can use at your own discretion)**
"I hope in my heart of hearts that you win your variance and you build whatever you want
on your land."
This was John's statement but I will not bring this up in a public forum as it is not my intentions
to drive a wedge between Mr. and Mrs. Ehlers.
ChronololZical Order of Events ReqardinlZ Mr. and Mrs. Ehlers
On August 15th 2002, we had a survey done so we could first try to establish if the existing home
was completely on Lot 1 Block 9, and then, if a proposed home could be built on Lot 2 Block 9.
The Ehlers were home that day while the surveyor was there, and were outside and talked with us
for nearly 2 hours. We told them why we were getting a survey done and that this was only the
beginning of the process. I also noted that since Mrs Ehlers had a property line dispute with the
neighbor to our south, that I thought this survey would also help her to clarify their lot lines.
During our conversation on August 15th Mrs. Ehlers said to my wife and me, "What you should
do is split the lot then just sell the whole thing, it'll be worth more."
We have spoken to the Ehlers several times since the survey was completed about our "proposed"
lot split and housing plans. However, once we realized that we needed a variance, we never
declared an actual construction start date.
On November 21 st, I went to nearby neighbors carrying a proposal of "Craftsman style four
square" homes and a petition to be signed, as you can see in back of original application. Our
petition states twice that we are pursuing a lot split and we propose only a small 1920's styled
four square home to be built. The Ehlers have a copy of this petition with our proposed
intentions. .
On December 18th, after the Planning Commission had "approved" our variance and subdivision, I
met with the Ehlers in their home and explained to them in full detail our proposed intentions with
the lot split and the future house style to be built. I fully disclosed everything I knew at that time,
as our :final approval was to be held up by their own appeal. During this conversation, they
wanted me to commit to "IF" and "WHEN" I was going to build a home on the lot. My wife and
I had not set any plans other then "First" get the lot subdivided then take the next step as we have
plans of starting a family and did not want to jump into the details when we ourselves need to take
one step at a time in the city planning process.
** The Ehlers are appealing our "approved" variance, and yet they were issued a permit to build
an addition with NO variance granted. This addition is 12 inches from the lot line and a mere 7
feet total from his neighbor's home, and has a window in the side of the structure which
violates fire code issues, and yet NO variance was issued to the Ehlers. They want denied to me,
that which they have enjoyed themselves. .
~
~.
.
.
.
\
~
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
(\-/
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
December 27, 2002
Subdivision of one 15,000 Square Foot Lot into Two Single Family Lots of
7,500 Square Feet each in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Case No.
800/02-87
This application is dependent on the variance being granted for the existing building setback
being considered as V /02-86. If the variance is not granted, the proposed subdivision cannot be
approved. The subdivision is creating the need for the variance.
Recommendation: Decision on variance.
Attachment: Staffreport and minutes of 12/9/02.
/-----;
~.......
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. 5UB/02-87
.
Planning Commission Date: December 9, 2002
Project Location: 603 Churchill Street West
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Family Residential
Zoning District: RB
Applicants Name: Scott and Lisa DeMars
Type of Application: Subdivision
Project Description: A subdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's Addition,
into two lots.
Discussion: The request is to subdivide Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's Addition
into two lots. Lot 1 would be 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 would be 7,511 square feet.
Both lots would be front Churchill Street.
The previous case heard at this meeting, V/02-86, the applicant requested a side yard .
setback Variance and a Variance to the percent of impervious surface allowed for thelot
with the existing house. The Variance request is due to subdividing the lots. The
existing house is built within the required 5 foot side yard setback. If the home was
located within the required setbacks staff could recommend approval of the subdivision.
Recommendation: Denial
Conditions of Approval: Should the Commission approve the request, staff suggests
the following conditions of approval:
l.The Legal Survey to be recorded.
Findings: The subdivision does not meet the development regulations of the zoning
and subdivision ordinances.
Attachments: Application form packet (see Case V/02-86).
CPC Action 12/09-02: +5-3 approval
.
"
. .'
..'
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
1. No more than 10 rental units shall be parked on the site at one time.
2. Landscaping around the U-Haul parking lot to be completed by 6/30/03. If
possible use taller trees for screening the northeast corner of the rehtal site.
3. No additional signage.
4. All revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V/02-86. A variance to the side yard setback (5 feet required, 3 feet
requested) and a variance to the impervious surface (30 percent allowed, 33.5
percent proposed) caused by an existing residence lot split located at 603
Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Scott and Lisa
DeMars, applicants. (See Case SUB/02-87 below.)
Mr. and Mrs. DeMars requested a variance to the side yard setback and a
variance to the impervious surface caused by an existing residence lot split
proposal.
Mr. and Mrs. DeMars have a large parcel of property and could legally split it into
two 7,500 square foot lots. The need for the variance arises with the setback
requirements for the existing house and the amount of impervious surface
covering the lot after it's been subdivided. The existing house is built 3 feet from
the new property line. This situation causes issues in terms of building and fire
codes. It appears that there is no other way the lot line can be drawn to ensure
the existing house is within the required setbacks.
Commissioner Ranum did not feel comfortable approving the variances.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Wald to approve
the variance to the side yard setback and the impervious surface located at 603
Churchill Street with the following conditions:
1. Must meet all building code regulations.
Motion passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. SUB/02-87. A subdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's
Addition, into two lots. Lot 1 - 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 - 7,511 square feet,
located at 603 Churchill Street West in the RB, Two Family Residential District.
Scott and Lisa DeMars, ~pplicants.
8
"
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
.
This case is related to the variance request for the side yard setback and
impervious surface.
Mr. and Mrs. DeMars requested to subdivide Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's
Addition into two lots. Lot 1 would be 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 would be 7,511
square feet.
,
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Peroceshi to
approve the subdivision of Lots 1 and 2, Block 9, Holcombe's Addition, into two lots. Lot
1 - 7,510 square feet and Lot 2 - 7,511 square feet, located at 603 Churchill Street West
with the following conditions:
1. The legal survey to be recorded.
Motion passed. 5 fore, 3 against.
Case No. SUP/02-88. A special use permit for a sign at Good Samaritan in a
residential zoned district located at 1119 Owens Street North in the RB, Two
Family Residential District. Troy Duncanson, Good Samaritan Center, applicant.
.
Mr. Duncanson requested a Special Use Permit for a new sign for the care
center. The sign will replace the existing ground lit sign. The proposed sign is a
36" by 72" monument sign with a two feet high concrete base. "Good Samaritan
Center" and the logo will be in white. The background will be dark blue. The sign
will be internally illuminated. The location will be the dame as the existing sign.
Motion made by Commissioner Gag, seconded by Commissioner Bealka to approve the
Special Use Permit for a new sign located at 1119 Owens Street North with the
following conditions:
1. No additional signage.
2. Flowers or shrubs shall be planted around the base of the sign.
3. To avoid the harsh glare of the bulbs, muted white bulbs or low voltage bulbs
shall be used.
4. All revisions to the approved request shall be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director.
5. The sign will have a dark blue background with white lettering.
Motion passed. 6 fore, 2 against.
.
9
- so I 5O\.":EO ",.4 50 50 50 150
~ ~ ..--.-, ~ .......-Y.mn.-,
o !~ Ii! !!! 150
1 0: h.,,, 5 4 3 2
.., 11 j~~Q'-:'
Ii! 7 100.14 ~,""
.'
-I
,
I
o
"
~!
.
J(
i
I
i
~
....... i
o 11 ~i
ffD13)
so
I 50
i .....'
2!!1 1 ~
,..;-,
50
.....-r
,,.
!
"'"
,..'
!!
2
02'
8
6'1051
150
.
Location Map
__ ~ ",2,8
~, 8 ,,~~
143.9 '-- 4flO14) 15
26 .......
144 , 144-
25 ~"16
~l '-'44
144
24 '\7
144.1 144' t ~
23 *"''',~~ \.'/
22 .,.,..1 ~,
1442 /
21
18 ./
!i pal ,.
J: 144.9 t.
I ~ ~ *""t~ /J
~~.
~ ~ ~~~
~ ; ~
.,,,,,,
~-"
.......".
~...,
........,.
.k- ...,.
1 !!
d"""
~ 6 ~
....'
4 !!
3 !!
2 ~
Pl)
5
d"""
,wt.-.-y J--r
..,.,.",
Ii!
t; ,A..~
Iii '"
ii: ~
o~~CDIi! 0
12,..:. ~ 0 ~ u.
5 g
~ 0
,.
,I...
1
~......
...........
fPOO81 ~
.....-r
~f 10!!
8
11 1~
...- ..,.
.poo11 l!
so
so
..
,"
so
so
so
o
'"
o
'"
o
'"
6 0
50150j~^,
""- rti/fIJi. .......,.. A..--
-- *"'"
4
3
2
(0150)
p"
A- ---1" .."...,.....,. J:--r
8
12
9 0 10 ~
*"'"
12 !!
*"'"
7 -
8 -
*"'"
50
6 0
5O~""""''''''50
.......1.... .......~
50 20130 50
o
'"
o
'"
o
'" t-
oo '.~t -'/ 1
3 ! ~ 02-efr
*"'" ~I ~{ "'02':'
J ~~~ ~ f' 1~102'
~ J
~ t-
~ i
50
f-BO
W
W
0:::
!! t;
5
4 !
*"'"
50
..
_-r
."
!! 6 !
lI""'"
~
r
9
...........
9 !! 10'
*"'"
J-.-r' ..;-..-1'"
............
W
i2 al
::E
o
()
--'
Ii! ~
12
t-
W
a::
0:::
<(
J:
..........
J-- --:fI"
*63)
!!
7 -
lI"""
8 !!
11
12
*""\:1
\:
. ..,
60
50
50
50
50
50
o
'"
o
'"
~
t
. 50 _
~
~60
150
169.59 +1-
q~
130
Ii!
300.38
'f""'"
170.38
t
I
REFERENCE LINE
~
h
<c"
.;--~
REFERENCE LINE
~ 7
*"'"
5
*"'"
4
~ t
~4
lill
lil I
~ f'
~ 4
33
3~,
31
30
143.8
29
*"'"
~/
~/
~
*"""
~ f'
04
. t
~ "
..
".2
*}( 1
t
i
24
144.5
23
.1101)
~ t
~~
~~:.ol: 1:1
'22"
*1001
144.7
21
144.7
2~,
144.8
~/
~
19
144.8
Ii!
n.s
o
'"
WEST
PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT PER DOC 8571lf
100
280.2
,
~~
I~ 2
II'
f065) &I
1
3
p'
...........
r'
e 143.6
~701
143.6
t ~
4 lil
/lil
10 ~
9
143.7
4fP0711
143.7
~72).11
143.8
.
.
12
143.8
/' il
'I ~
I~
*"'" 13
143.9
~,
,
~
J
144.2
20
144.2
50
t-
W
W
J.g:
:CI)
po'
2
144.3
3
*087)
J
9
144.4
4
144.4
,~' ,
~ f~
1~,7 /p ~
9-1' ./
/';0.
/ 1~~.8
11
*"'"
'fl
*"'"
J
144.9
t
J ~
13
l4S
1:-,
Iii!
145
HANCOCK
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
lil
1-
i
~
~
i
~ "
Ii!
~
i
~
i
~
~
~
~
J:
t-
::>
o
CI)
~
~
~
60
f
Ii!
~
*"'"
~+
t
~ AREAS
100 ~
~
7 ~
R21W R-"t{)w R19W
n2N1
nlNl
J T32N
~nlN
nON
T29N
T2SN USN
nmLJ nm
R22W JUtW R10W
Vicinity Map
o
163
Scale in Feet
~
ThIldlllWingilll"-.....of.ecmpitalion
Mdr.p~oIW1llIllCOnla..ltwt
.......lnvarlousW~c-.lyotr_
The~.nauld bIo.-..db Nf....-
JUPOII_onIy.W.........COUnIyillllll
_ponllibkofor...,~.
OF
Souru: W8ll~CoWIly~IOmc.
PIw:Inll(651)43O-II75
PwaiI d1II1 baHd an AS40lI n'onMlion
CUII'WlIlhn>lIgh:~3O,2002
... printed". NawnlbW22. 2002
f (~
M'tlvA VIT OF PUBLICATION
~tillwater ~a?ette
1931 Curve Crest Blvd.
Stillwater, MN 55082
(651)439-3130 Fax:(651)439-4713
11/29/02
State of Minnesota}
ss.
County of Washington}
The undersigned, being duly sworn, on Oath, says that slhe is the Publisher or authorized agent and
employee of the Publisher known as the Stillwater Evening Gazette, and has full knowledge of the facts
which are stated. (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting
qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota State Statute 331A.02, 331A.07 and
other applicable laws as amended. Printed below is a copy of the lowercase Alphabet, from A to Z, both
inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged ~;;;zfhe size and kind type used in composition and
C;:Zt' '~;i~~'7
.f /' \ .
PUblirlAUthOrized Agent .
Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed to me
onthis 2-1~ dayof /lO;t/~~
. (
~L~(<:
Notary Pubiic I j .
,2002.
. ~ i'~""'_ '-
j'::ARK BEFlRIMAN i
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
:c7imissiOfi ExPires..~ -~::20.0~
"'
-
City of Stillwater
2164th St N.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Invoice #: 00001706
Terms: Net 30 .
Inches
3 Stillwater
Description
City of Stillwater Case. No.
SUB/02-87, DeMars
Request, Published 11/29
Price
$4.03
Total
$12.09
$12.09
Maximum rate per column inch under
Minnesota Law: $16.90 per 12-pica column
Sub Total
Payment
$12.09
$0.00
Balance Due
$12.09
<.
.
I
'G' tte' NoVember 29. 2002 ;
Stillwater aze u' B U'C' HEARING" ~r
NOTICE OF..tR .. ' .'..
'SUBDIVISI9N .,
Notice is ~~re~~'~~~~:t~at te~=~~ \
Commission of the ,11:'f 0 Monday'
Minnesota, . wilL meeL on . th~,
December. 9, 2002.;- at 7 p.m,; In i
C ncil ChamberS~at..$tillwater C~ tlall,!
ou rih' Fourth" $treet, to consider a.!
216 N(l .., .' n<i (j DeMars for .1lI
request from Scott a,c ~"2 'Slock'9:1
subdiviSiO~ of. ~?ts ~~.t~o I~ts. Lot 1 -.
Holcombe s AdditloJ;"~tti:2 _ 7 511 SCJuare,
7 ,510 sq\lardElf~~~~'.!9rChili' Street W~.
feet locate .alOVo>~IU... . .F.... ., l
in the RElJvio F~il~,:Rlilsident., ."?,
Case NO'!:_~, .
.M . .' '(c::... .' . with ref~r-
All person~ 'ishlng ~o ~ ~:a::ard at this
ence to thiS ,r~~es.~ . . .
meeting: .. '; ,...
',' ,~"~_d'''-~';T. '.: ~":;..:~;i~": ,r .
Steve Russell" ,"i;;.,; ,
commllniI:'fDey~~~~e",~ Dlrectot,.ii29
:#1:"' ....:,",~:~~.,'
....~.~~_.....;
.,~"; ~.1. __--~ -
.
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
Case No: 6Ue/r>>-&
,
.'
.
Date Filed:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.:
ACTION REQUESTED
FEES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET'
STILLWATER, MN55082
~SpeciallConditional Use Permit $50/200
vVariance $70/200
---..Resubdivision . $1 00
.JLSubdivision* . $100+50/lot
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
. Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council, twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay the
application process.
:....Address of Project &03 W..~lArt'J\J II <t;1-. Assessor's Parcel Nci.-3363bW2-l00S"'
(GEO Code)
Zoning District e..'2- Description of Project S~ DttrA+e. Lo+ I t.1CJfLJ-ot? B I k... C)
.
JJo(f.lwn~.~ ~t~ t)Y\ ,'V\ ~r ~(}A' lvl "~V'f.'AA-~yY1~ 7- Sf-Dr-U .
,. . ~ r
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further certify I will comply with
the permit if it is granted and used. "
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Property Owner Y-D ~ vv1 U~))f ){a.-::s
Mailing Address &0:2.::> W. c.kLt....C(,v'U St:..
City - State - Zip~ II uhAt r, . M AI t;S1f~ 2-
Telephone No. flIS,) L{.~-fJ~14
(\ _I J (;\ n11 .
Signature~ ;. ~_.'11 LaA< _.
(Signature is required)
Representative
Mailing Address
City - State - Zip
Telephone No.
Signature .'
(Signature is required)
...... LLot Size (dimensions) tbO x 'so
. yt.-and Area IS' ....(')() &;( (+)
. -',:...,-.. Height of Buildings: Stories
. Principal \.S'"
Accessory I
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area 25D<:) square feet
Existing square feet
Feet Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area 3i3 square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces l./ - 6""
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12, 2002
.
.
CERTIFICA TEOF SURVEY
o Ind. 113774 iron pipe set. . BARRETT M. STACK .
. Ind. mon, found as noted.
Bearing system is assumed datum. STlLLWATBR, MINN. 5508Z
Offsets shown to existing structures are MINNISOTA IUlGISTIKID
meas. to the outside bull ding wall llne, LANDSURVIYOR
unless shown or noted otherwise. rei. No. 439-5630
Underground or overhead public or private utilities, on
or adjacent the parcels, were not located in conjunction
with this survey, unless noted otherwise hereon.
Overall parcel contains 15021 sq. ft., more or less.
SURVEY MADE BXCLUslVBLY FOR, Scott and Lisa DeMars, 603 West Churchlll St., Stlllw~ter, MN55082
Notes:
DKsCRJP110N. As Supplied By Client: , (copy of Doc. No. 994826, Wash. Co. records)
Lots 1 and 2,.Block 9, Holcomb's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota.
u
$7:
N
Ci)
\
:'\.\.\....... ,,\.\.. ':'....,.3
.~
# *'.
AI".erH
/"=Z()'
IL.
-.
.
.
\
.
.
.
.
Memo
/
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
~
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
December 27,2002
Subdivision of One 27,500 Square Foot Lot into Two Lots of 15,800 square
feet and 11,760 square feet in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Case No. SUB/02-83
This item was reviewed by the Planning Commission on December 9, 2002. After the hearing,
the unanimously recommended approval of the lot split.
Recommendation: Decision on lot split request.
Attachments: CPC staffreport and minutes of 12/9/02.
r',
/-
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUB/02-83
.
Planning Commission Date: December 9,2002
Project Location: 1602 Greeley Street South
Comprehensive Plan District: Single Family Residential
Zoning District: RA
Applicants Name: Robert and Carol Greethurst
Type of Application: Subdivision
Project Description: Request to subdivide 27,500 square foot lot into two lots of
11,760 and 15,800 square feet in the RA, Single Family Residential District.
Discussion: The request to subdivide a large single family lot of 27,500 square feet
into two lots of 11,760 square feet and 15,800 square feet. An existing residence is
located on one of the lots. The new lots meet the size requirement of the RA Zoning
District and the existing residence (garage) meets the setback requirement for the new .
lot line.
Recommendation: Approval
Conditions of Approval:
1. Drainage and utility easements shall be provided as required by the City Engineer.
Attachments: Application.
CPC Action on 12/9/02: +8-0 approval.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
The Commission was concerned about drainage issues. Mr. Zuber stated that
the yard slopes towards the lake. There will not be an increase in impervious
surface.
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve
the variance to the rear yard setback for the construction of an addition, deck and a 120
square foot accessory structure located at 716 South Owens Street with the following
conditions: '
1. The addition shall be similar in style and materials as the main structure.
2. The garden shed shall be reduced to 120 square feet.
Motion passed. 7 fore, 1 against.
Case No. V/02-82. A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 29 feet
requested) for the construction of an addition to an existing porch located at 523
West Moore Street, in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Todd and Erica
Fultz, applicants.
.
Mr. and Mrs. Fultz requested a variance to construct a 6 ft by 10ft addition to an
existing front porch. The existing porch is built 29 feet from the front property line;
the addition would stay the same distance from the property line.
Mr. and Mrs. Fultz are planning a two-story addition to the east side of the house
and extending the porch to the east will help create a symmetrical balance to the
house.
Motion made by Commission Gag, seconded by Commissioner Middleton to approve
the variance to the front yard setback for the construction of an addition to an existing
front porch located at 523 West Moore Street with the following condition:
1. The addition shall be similar in style, color and materials as the main structure.
Motion passed unanimously.
Case No. SUB/02-83. A subdivision of Lot 11, Block 1, Linson Addition, 1602
South Greeley Street, into two lots consisting of Lot 1 -11,760 square feet and Lot
2 - 15,575 square feet in the RA, Single Family Residential District. Robert and
Carol Greethurst, applicants.
.
Mr. and Mrs. Greethurst requested to subdivide a large single family lot of
27,5000 square feet into two lots of 11,760 square feet and 15,800 square feet.
6
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
.
An existing residence is located on one of the lots. The new lots meet the size
requirement of the RA Zoning District and the existing residence (garage) meet
the setback requirement for the new lot line. "
Motion passed unanimously,
Case No. SUP/02-85. A special use permit to conduct an outside U-haul trailer
and van rental business at 227 North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business
District. Leverne Stefan, applicant.
Mr. Stefan requested a Special Use Permit for a U-Haul business located in the
Maple Island Hardware Store parking lot.
Ten stalls in the northeast comer of the Maple Island Hardware Store parking lot
have been designated to park the trailers and vans. There are 25 parking spaces
on the north side of the hardware store and 5 stalls on the east side of the
building.
.
The parking lot will have screening. Three foot high trees were recommended by
the HPC for screening. The landscaping will be .completed by 6/30/03.
Commissioner Peroceshi inquired about parking the trailers and vans in the baGk
of the building during the day, but because of daily delivers this is not an option.
Commissioner Ranum requested that taller trees be used for screening
materials.
Chairperson Hultman was concerned about the trucks being downtown.
Commissioner Middleton felt that the business would take away from the
downtown area.
Motion made by Commissioner Ranum, seconded by Council Representative Zoller to
approve the Special Use Permit for a U-Haul business located at 227 North Main Street
with the following conditions: .
7
.'
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION APPLICATION FORM
Case No: Sbf;~
Date Filed: ,~IJJ..II03-
Fee Paid: .,,;/stJ
Receipt No.:
...<....
,
.
ACTION REQUESTED
FEES
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STillWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STillWATER, MN 55082
_Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
Variance $70/200
. _Resubdivision $100
-l(Subdivision* $100+50/lot
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
_Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc~)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
. supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will delay tf
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
. Address of Project 1 irJ 0 ~ G r" PAJ.I e.U S+' 5.' Assessor's Parcel No..33; n30. ~O, ~ . 00 ~
~A '. (GEO Code)
AA" . J j lC ....... "-
Zoning District. Description of Project 'v \ tn.nr ~LU:>.rJ.1 ",VI S L~.
"I hereby state theiEore oing statements and a~' data, information and evidence subm!tted ~erewith in a!
respects, to the best my knowledge and belIef, to be true and correct. I further certIfy I will comply W/i
the permit if it is g nted and used. " .
Property Owner.Bwe.r.J- aj...- farn I ~sf- Representative \).~J~ ~
Mailing AddressJ1,D;)' (,.r.., 41 JJ I I S+' -;:) I Mailing Addres \ r," l
~ , .L ~
City - State - zipSillu>>-+er (Y)"'-L 5S08~ \\\~"
Telephone No. I) Ll3q~ K"iS'l./ L./ Telephone No. ~ .
Signature ~// Signature ~ t~ . .
(Signature ~r\)ft1:d)
.
Lot Size (dimensions) 7t:> x J fa 8"
Land Area I J 7hD S.-P.
Height of Buildi~gs: Stories
Principal I\i.I A-
A I
ccessory " I ~.
I
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area square feet
Existing square feet
Feet Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PLANAPP.FRM April 12. 2002
SUBDIVISION CODE OF THE \,,1.11 OF STILLWATER
f 32-1
.
PA
. (1) Name:
Address:
.t'lU!iAPPLICATION FO~ .
I<tJb(u'.~ ~ &rol' 0("e.elJ1LtfS.d-
lloo~ G~p_""l~~ ~+. OS.
~; '1l...l')~.pJ"1 . m f\.l 5:.,S"2)g'"d-
1< D be.r.... ( IP '5 I) '"1 q - ~ b 3- 5
Telephone: CLArn I ~"f;I) 4.13'::;- ~ ~u I
(VI)
( 14'5 J") 434 - ~'XLI-(j
- . ,. _n
.(H)
(2) Name of proposed development:
I\J / A-
I
Number oflots:
One- rI.\\/~ApA r..n+n -t.wD
(3) Legal description:
LO-f: II
L~(1~ J1dtJ ;~~
Size of .... '.....erty in acres: ~A..
(.i (l fe_S
~t r::-CM\<;'~ / ~ f=~'1
(r=~ 'j Si'.h/"j!fO f=({NVI; ILl ?
. 1-i1 k...I- <~'5.-+r;r-; ( ? .
~ ~(1n.";~/5~p 'f='~~/V ~
_"-16+ ~~ "-t- ~
(4) Current use of property:
Proposed use of property:
Current zoning of property:
Proposed zoning of property:
Natural resources located on property:
Historic resources located on property:
f-.J Oh {L
(5) Submittal requirements: . .
I Sketch plan (SP)
Applicant's signature
Date 11- -7 / - ,1..:t.
/)tD~~
.
CD32:35
-, Ii
. 149.66
*"" l:;
R2IW R20W Rt9W
~ 184.37 n2NI
{=
18 nlNI nlN
pm
199.69 nON ,~
.- TI9N
" 8
~ T'..8N T28N
TImW TIm
R22W R21W R20W
;, tflO131 M
a ~
!!!
~ .
1 364.08
0 WEST ORLEANS STREET .....
'"
:;! 661,09
105.21 \. + 134.82
~~ 30 30 ~~
m m 10 8
~ 1 8 ~ p" lIi
*"'" Ii
.W 1SCl03
. 120.00 -I
~ 8
:Ii
N ~
~ 2 C3
....'
\. z ~
120.00 0 :i ,~.p-
en
3 8 Z ~
.....' l! ::i
g
i ~
r'2J
1..
tfUl11
:;!
18
.".,..
'118.68
..,.LER Bl.OCK 2 Iii
~;J; & CARTERS yo
i
>-
W
...J
W
W
0:::
C)
-,
i to
,.....~
; ~
-~ >
-,..~ II
.....'
172.211
Ii
~?=I I
.::>
'0
CI)-+
99.98 33 CA. VAC STREET
~ VACATED - -,OOC/672844 ~
~ROIXST - H
~ ~;E~ ~ ( .RT ~;.S ~~l!( oN
654 312 111U:~
i .....' · 6'" ~~ ~~ ~
J,,"'" ~
I
12
....'
60.52
158...
tJlOlIl
'-- ....{.
....50____________
~
""'8
150
.....'
~
.".,.,
h
II
~
155.4
~
*"..,
CURVE
~BLVO
eRE-51 . oOC 408738
pEf'
t\'I'I'I EJ'SaJ<Etlt .._ ---::~
..
-~~ ~,...'--.-
.".,.,
:Ii
"..'!,...---' .
.-/"",4
:Ii
J
NlINEOFS 552FT
- *
'-- 18
~
.
!!
*,,'6)
<0
<0
665
Location Map
POCNTOF l.... .0;:............._.. BETWEEN THE
NORIH Ute OF THE SOUTH 455.911 FT
Vicinity Map
380.7
.
I
o
159
Scale in Feet
1hlI d..... .... .... 01. c:ampllllllon
.. ......ofllrlll~_....,.
.....1n___W~CaunI)'omc...
TMdl-*v......d......rw.-..-
........ ady. w....... CIMIty II naI
~-.-.y~
a...: W-'*'UlOnCo\dJ~OIlil:a
~(15')430-8175
PMiIII.....___MMOOiriDnllIt&loIl
CUINnlIItlIvuClk~30.2OlD
....... .......21.2002
i-L
W
W
cr f\;
I-rcri I
en co
""'"
<'!
co
('I)
~
.(0012)
o
~
T-
r ~EET 554.99
150
iOOf1)
661.09
o
('I)
o
o
Lri
0>
FOR\
>- I RAM4E
W
--l
W I
W,
cr
<.9-
172.28
~9)
...L.
(2; I-
;;; ::>
~ 0
en
~ 33 1
-
.41
12
.(0033)
99.98
7
N
o
o
.0>
N
Location Map
-,
I~
o VACATED
('I) 8T CROIX 8T I
40 ,I 40 I
I
I
I
'DO
II 40
.
R,2tW IUOW RI9W
n2N1 J n2N
"~ '\""
=t. ~
~~ 1:~
nmLU nm
RnW ~IW R20W
Vicinity Map
.
o
53
Scale in Feet
Thladr-*'llil.....fIl.campI.....
..~gfllnd__....,
.....1n___W~ "'"'""_ .
TheIlraMJlg...... ....lor......
...... q. w.lliftC/lCIIlColny IIIl1li1
............,--.....
aa.-: W......~...,....OlIlra
"'- (851)43D4B7S
PaR1Il....t-.d..AS4llllWonnatlc:fl
~1tInR4III:~3O,2OlI2
_~ .......21.2D02
~
53.71
; ~l$>
.OS "~
I\.JV . ~
..
.7.
~
j~
%
'8
~<O
..........
~
(]l
o
o
w
~
~
o
~
~
.78:~2._'~
C~
../~~
~9t
~I
85.00
<D
<D
~.
~N
........
-
Q
V
I ').I
I;t\
-
131.64
VJ
VJ
"-
Q
r ;
~ I
i -
() I
I.
if I
- ,
^ !
m~_+ 0
~
r
5.$
l
.
~~
1;'- ·
..
.
!!l
'10
85.00
~
(]l
o
o
w
fl\
168.00
'7t>/
\J
. "i".St'
"""''''..,. ~
, .~;':./ ,~
-'1' '. "J.
, .~' '~hl"1..
l ... rJ
"4 .
. ~'d'" ..
,.~ e ::-
.152.28
~
........
180
246.93
79.79
'8
~~
..........0
95.00
~
~
0'>
0'>
. en
'-
~'l7'
.,.>.
o
\
.eu1;
.v'v,
~
w
~
co
I\.)
~
~
~
<D
,/
86.27
j~
'8
@
--
86
.
.
.
Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Develvp.lu.ent Director {l/'"
December 27,2002
Request for 15 Lot Subdivision, 14 Residential, 1 Commercial, Located West
ofCR 5. Case No. SOO/02-63.
This application is a followup to the previous Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning
Amendment for the site. Yet to come is the final design of the project and final PUD approval.
The subdivision shows private streets and the necessary utIlity connections to service the
property.
The Planning Commission heard and approved the subdivision request at their meeting of
December 9, 2002.
Recommendation: Decision on request
Attachments: Staff report, minutes and preliminary plat.
.
.
.
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUB/02-63
Planning Commission Date: December 9,2002
Project Location:Parkwood Lane
Comprehensive Plan District: Townhouse Residential and Business Park
Commercial
Zoning District: TH and BP-C
Applicants Name: Tim Nolde
Type of Application: Subdivision
Project Description: The application is for a 15 lot subdivision, 14 attached single
family residential lots and one commercially zoned lot.
Discussion: The comprehensive plan amendment, zoning amendment and planned
unit development concept approval for the project site was reviewed by the planning
commission on July 8,2002 and approved by the City Council on August 20,2002. As a
follow up for development, the owner is now proposing to subdivide the site into 15
lots, 14 residential and one commercial. Besides the subdivision, final planned unit
development (PUD) design review is required for the residential development design
and bank design. For information, the PUD design gUidelines and conditions of
approval are attached for use in reviewing the subdivision request. Most of the
conditions will be used to review final PUD plans for the residences and bank.
The subdivision utility/drainage/grading plans were reviewed by the engineering
department with specific comments (attached) that c~m be accommodated in final
plans. .
County Road 5 access and right of way improvements are controlled by Washington
County Public Works and will require their permit approval. .
Also, the grading and drainage plans will require Brown's Creek Watershed District
approval before improvement plans can be finally approved and constructed.
A comprehensive trail/Sidewalk plan shall be constructed by the developer in lieu of
park land dedication (see attached trail/sidewalk map).
The proposed 15 lot residential/commercial subdivision is consistent with the recently
amended comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance.
.
.
.
Recommendation: Approval
Conditions of Approval:
1. A comprehensive trial plans and its improvement shall be constructed in lieu of park
dedication as part of the utility improvements and completed before certificate of .
occupancy is issued (See attached map for location of sidewalks/trail).
2. All comments from the City Engineer shall be incorporated in the final plans before
the plat is recorded.
3. An access permit from Washington County shall be obtained before final subdivision
approval. "
4. The drainage/grading plans shall be approved by Brown's Creek Watershed District.
Attachments: Application, preliminary plat and improvement plans SUB/02-63.
CPC Action on 12/9/02: +7-1 approval
.
.
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
Chairperson Hultman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Commissioners Bealka, Gag, Middleton, Peroceshi, Ranum, Wald, and
Council Representative Zoller
Absent:
Commissioner Teske
Others:
Community Development Director Russell
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion made by Commissioner Peroceshi, seconded by Commissioner Gag to approve
the November 13, 2002 commission minutes. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. SUB/02-63. A subdivision of a 3.71 acre lot into 14 residential lots and
one 1.7 acre commercial lot located on the west side of CR 5 and south of Curve'
Crest Blvd in the TH, Townhouse Residential District and the BP-C, Business
Park Commercial District. Time Nolde, Anchobaypro, Inc., applicant.
The comprehensive plan amendment, zoning amendment and planned unit
development concept approval for the project site was reviewed by the Planning
Commission on July 8, 2002 and approve by the City Council on August 20,
2002. As a follow up for development, the owner is now proposing to subdivide
the site into 15 lots, 14 residential and one commercial. Besides the subdivision,
final planned unit development design review is required for the residential
development design and bank design.
The subdivision utility/drainage/grading plans were reviewed by the Engineering
Department with specific comments that can be accommodated in final plans.
County Road 5 access and right-of-way improvements are controlled by
Washington County Public Works and will require their permit approval.
The grading and drainage plans will require Brown's Creek Watershed District
approval before improvement plans can be finally approved and constructed.
There will be no connection between Parkwood Lane and County Road 5.
Greg Wind, 6322 Stillwater Boulevard, had concerns with the required square
footage for the townhomes arid losing his driveway. Mr. Wind stated that he has
contacted an attorney and believes the project should be stopped until the
square footage issue can be resolved. Mr. Wind was informed by Tim Nolde that
1
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 9, 2002
an easement has been granted to him for his driveway. Community Development
Director Russell informed Mr. Wind that the square footage meets the
requirements for townhomes. .
Motion made by Commissioner Middleton, seconded by Commissioner Bealka to
approve the subdivision of 3.71 acre lot into 14 residential lots and one 1.7 acre
commercial lot located on the west side of CR 5 and south of Curve Crest Blvd. with the
following conditions:
1. A comprehensive trail plan and its improvement shall be constructed in lieu of
park dedication as part of the utility improvements and completed before the first
certificate of occupancy is granted.
2. All comments from the City Engineer shall be incorporated in the final plans
before the plat is recorded.
3. An access permit from Washington County shall be obtained before final
subdivision approval.
4. The drainage/grading plans shall be approved by Brown's Creek Watershed
District.
. Motion passed. 7 fore, 1 against.
Case No. V/02-70. A variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 12 feet
proposed) for the construction of a new single family residence on lot north of
721 South Martha Street in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Rodney Bahr,
Bahr Construction, applicant (continued from November 13, 2002 meeting).
This item was initially presented to the Planning Commission on October 14,
2002. At that hearing the case was continued to the November 13, 2002 meeting
for additional design information. The design plans were not available for the
November 13, 2002 meeting; the case was continued to the December 9,2002
meeting.
Rodney Bahr agreed to all of the suggested design changes to the home.
Mr. Bahr requested a variance to the front yard setback and for driveway
easement on the adjacent property for construction of a single family home. The
size of the lot is 52 feet wide by 150 feet deep. A large pine tree is located
midway back on the north side of the lot.
.
Ken Gillian, 722 Martha Street, was a representative for three other houses on
his street. They are concerned about the additional run off that may be created
and the front property line exceeding other the structures.
2
.
.
.
r ~i '~wate[
~ - ~
--- --, ~
THE BIRTHPlACE OF MINNESOTA . J
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SUBDMSION
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, will
meet on Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Stillwater City
Hall, 216 North Fourth Street, to consider a request from Anchobaypro, Inc., for a
subdivision of a 3.71 acre lot into 14 residential lots and one 1.7 acre commercial lot
located on the west side of CR 5 and south of Curve Crest Blvd in the TH, Townhouse
Residential District and the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District. Case No. SUBj02-
63.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this
meeting.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Publish: December 27, 2002
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 651-430-8800
., PLANNING ADMINI~~RATION APPLICATION F~RM
Case No:
Date Filed:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No.:
62~
~~
3'f?!i
.
ACTION REQUESTED
FEES
\
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STillWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STilLWATER, MN 55082
Special/Conditional Use Permit $50/200
.. Variance $70/200
Resubdivision . $1 00
..cSubdivision* . '. $1 00+501ll
_Comprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
_Zoning Amendment* $300
_Planning Unit Development * $500
Certificate of Compliance $ 70
*An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees.
.
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.)
submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Sixteen (16) copies of
. supporting material is required. If application is submitted to the City Council twelve (12) copies of
supporting material is required.
A site plan is required with applications. Any incomplete application or supporting material will dela
application process.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
. Address of Project&ft;wOC;!J L/vJ11 Assess.or's Parcel No.
(GEO Code)
Zoning District Description of Project ON ~ eArN ~ P> (;) l L~l N (;, f
l4 Fo ~ 7kt-'-. To WfV L*O.M.li j
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evIdence submitted herewith j
respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, to be true and correct. I further. ~ ertify I will compl}
the permit if it is granted and used. " ,'C ~)
Property Owner ArN~A: V fRo 1 ":tIvc-. Representative .
Mailing Address ~ () .. I L ~ Mailing Address
City'- State -:-.Zip "), l~ ;V1A; '7;o'8'2eity~- Stat~~Zip
Telephone No. C9S ( - .t{ ~ - <ff fl7 Telephone No.
Signatu~ Hz~ Signature .
're '(Signature I~ required) (Signature Is required)
.
Lot Size (dimensions) _ x
Land Area
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Total Building floor area square fee
Existing square feet
Feet Proposed square feet
Paved Impervious Area square feet
No. of off-street parking spaces
H:\mcnamara\sheila\PlANAPP.FRM Apn112.2002
-
.
.
,.........
.
.
.
.
...
t_u.__.;!'~~.___ ~ 3D
= ~ = ~
~.~--_..----- a::
<
:.. 1l1.
.
I,
'.. ,"
: '~' l!'~Il--;~:'~'
, r
....~~....
· Doc: ......
.
...
.
. /
-
...
i
~!._..-
.
...
"U':::;"'- .
....
LANe
CUn.OT A
.
.
..
=. ""/
....~..........'1..,\
1. . "
/
.....~ .-rto'f'
~~ ~ ~"v..i ~ J.-
s 'l.~;" / Oe
.....
I,., ~_ .
I
.
.
omor .
~IW ~w J:~
~nlN
-tt
T.!INLJ n7N
n7N
'IU.."W R11W IUOW
.
Vicinity Map
. ..L
,-~.
.----~.1
'T
o
Scale in Feet
........=::,...~
=-=~==-..<:::::
=---:.,~~
=-...... c-ar~()lllIla
::::::="-----
.......--..:. am
::"'~"""'ZI."
.
.
It
".--1.,."
.-
- - ~
~~~~~.'L-7r:'T'".::Ir.~..:!"~~~~ 'fr''''..... "_ ",,",l..._~_.....~_
R2IW R20W RI9W
n2N
DIN
.1 .~
nON. >r
ll,
~
T29N ~ n9N
_ 1
128N 128N I'
, ~
: I
127N
Location Map
R22W R21 W R20W
Vicinity Map
N
E
s
,0
~
200
Scale in Feet
lONG lJ\KEESTATES,
PHASE TWO
AS P.ROPOSED BY:
ANCHOBAVPRO, INC.
TIM NOLDE
P.O. BOX 119
STILLWATER, MN 55082
SITE DESIGN:
TOMTEN ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN
P.O. BOX 272
MARINE ON ST. CROIX, MN 55047
June 21, 2002
~..-,--,
.~- . ~'"'~=--=~ "
--
N
. A
1 ": 200'
s.anfARY sewER
......
STORMfEWER
WATER MAIN
&ofU-
FOR MAIN
s.anTARY SERVICE
--------------
WATER SERVIce
o "'N~iOLE
. CATCHBASIN
II WATERVAl.VE
. HYCRANT
~ F1.AIREO END
rIi' UFT STATION
c:
0
i~
'C_ 1f
.
.
DATE
11/09/00
PAGE
Be
......ft!!!.;:.. :;:..'1..\~\.:1=..~'i'~1 I:"~I,:,,~::,:,'
-
,
.
MEMORANDUM
November 25, 2002
To: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
From: Shawn Sanders, Assistant City Engineer
RE: Parkwood Lane
In review of the grading and utility plan for the Parkwood Villas project, the following
items should be addressed prior to approval:
.
1. Relocate the sanitary sewer and water so that it does not go under the pond
2. Justify the CN values used in the proposed storm pond calculations. They appear
to be lower than they should be.
3. The plan shows the 18" outlet of the pond into the manhole on CR 5 . This
manhole should be analyzed more in detail since the pipe out of the outlet is only
a 12" RCP
4. Provide better detail on the ponds outlet structure. The information provided in
the report conflicts with each other. '.
5. Provide documentation of the easement for the sanitary sewer and the water
coming form Long lake Villas.
6. Final plans for grading and utility shall be approved by the Engineering
Department.
.
.
.
.
,.
.)
JjPVp/o-c_Sb
Conditions of Annroval
1. The park dedication requirement for the townhouse subdivision shall be provided with
subdivision "pp" oval.
2. A CR 5 access permit shall be obtained from Washington County for the proposed
driveways. '.' . '. . ..
3. Fencmg, landscaping, benning, retaining walls shall be used along the perimeter of the drive
through driveway to screen headlights from adjacent residential areas.
4. The final design for the bank building shall be reviewed based on the architectural and site
design guidelines.
5. The City Engineer shall review the drainage plan to ensure ponding requirements are met.
6. Drainage, utility and trail easements shall be provided with the subdivision on final PUD
approval.
7. The detailed townhouse plans shall be reviewed by the fire department for access
f:\ requirements regarding road width.
tJ A monument type sign made of materials consistent with the bank building shall be allowe~
rather than the 20' pylon sign. A building sign indicating the name of the bank over the mam
entry may also be allowed.
9. Heritage Preservation Commission conditions of approval are added as conditions of this
approval.
10. The site drainage plan shall be approved by Browns Creek Watershed District before final
plan approval. '. .
. 11. The maximum height of the bank building shall be two levels and 40 feet.
12. A bank or similar professional office use shall be located on the commercial site. .
13. No vehicle connection between Cr 5 and Parkwood Lane.
Attachments: Application and PUD plans and architectural and site design standards.
CPC Action on 7/8/902: +8-0 approval.
.
.
.
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION
APPUCAnON REVIEW FORM
CASE NO, DRJ02-38
Heritage Preservation Date: July 1,2002
pro).ectLocauOn: StIDwater BlVd between curve Crest and WHdpInes:, east of .
Parkwood lane
Comprehensive Plan District We$t Business Park District
Zoning Di.h;ct Single Family Attached and Business Park Commercial
Applicanfs Name: Tim Nolde
Type of AppUcation: Design Review
Project Description: Design review of planned unit development. for a 3.67 acRj
mixed use residentiaJloffice development.
Discussion
The applicant is requesting design approve of a conceptuaf devefopment The
development. will consist of 14 multHamiIy residential ~ Cll2 aaes; and one
comm....~ bank With a drive thru en the remaining 1.61 acres. A site plan of the. . .
development and the Architectural and-Site. Design Guidelines has been provided.. The-
guidelines give the perspectives and goals offhe project. ..
Recommendation:
Approval as ~uo;.J.
Conditions of Approval:. .
1. HPC will ~DduQ fiDaI de$ign ~}I&Vlt.l orthe~ -' ~lifdin.8 nw~r,.. ~'\>~~
andli~g plans nL..uthe p1ansarec...~
2. AIr utilities $half be compretely $Creened ;1"",," public view.
3_ Atightingplan showing. the fbdure type, ~ Iocationandexlerior fighting
intensity $hall be submitted with building permit pfaos for ~ tnr~ .'.
.!:lnt'\"",,_I. AIlti.",hf{ '0- ShaIlbedirect&d. fromthesfreet8nd~ '~'.... . ,
~"'YCIU ~-v ~ . . . .
pr~ Ught sour<* shall be 'Shield$(ffrom dir$Ct view MdprQfecfed fQrm
damag&by vebicles.
4. All landscaping shall be installed before ~ r~ or final project in+,~~
No project shallbe phased unless approval isgranled by the .PIanniog
Commission. '
5. Continuous concrete curbing shall be installed to separate parking areas fi'om
1anc:Jseape er$a$. . .
:.......,:
.
.
.
'S. Handicapped tJdl ;dng spaces and sigf.'lage, in comp-trance ,with ~tate" .
requirements, shaD be shown on" building permit plans and inslalled before final
inspection of the project.
7. The :oi.cet address of the building ~U.be clisp~y~d:inalacatiQn ~rou$:""
from the public street. .
8. The trash eooosureshall be made of a sturdy opaque masonry material, with.
trash receptacles screened from view and compatible with the color and .
materials of the project. '". " '. '. .' : . . . .'. .:. '
9. All trees required to remain on site, as indicated on the plans, shall be protected
by fencing or other necessary measures shall be taken to prevent damage during
construction activity.
10. No roof equipment shall be visible to the general public.
11. All gutters, downspouts, flashings, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the
adjacent surface. .
12. Construction projects shall conform to the City's Noise ordinance. Construction
during the dry season shall mitigate excess dust problems.
11. A sign permit shall be required for all project signs.
12. Grading and drainage plan to be approved by City Engineer before building permits
are issued.
13. Sign package to be approved by the Heritage Preservation Commission, including
directional signs.
14. Exterior lighting plan to be reviewed and approved by the Heritage PreseNation
Commission.
15. All security lights on building shall be downlil . .
16. All eXterior modifications to the approved plan are to be reviewed by Community .
Development Director. "
17.
Findings
The proposal meets the intent of the West Business Park Design Guidelines.
Attachments:
Application Form/Site Plan
:....
.........
LONG LAKE ESTATES, PHASE TWO
. ARCHITEL I URAL AND SITE DESIGN GUIDELINES
21 June 2002
Goal:
· Create a Well-designed transition from the County Road 5 corridor to the
residential area using a mix of multi-family residential and commercial buildings.
· Integrate a pedestrian pathway that completes a connection along the west
side of County Road 5 and creates a gateway for the trail into the residential area.
· Create a higher density housing opportunity. in close proximity to existing
infrastructure, jobs and services.
.
Lot Coverage:
· 60 percent maximum building and hard surface coverage.
Pedestrian Access:
· The project will provide pedestrian access via pathways along County Road 5,
and between County Road 5 and Parkwood Lane.
Building Design:
. No franchise or prototypical commercial building design shall be allowed.
. Commercial structures shall have a scale and massing compatible with the
adjacent residential area.
. Residential structures on Parkwood lane shall address the street with semi-
public spaces (front porches, covered entries, etc.) and walkways from the entry
to the curb.
Materials
. No concrete panels, standard concrete block or metal siding shall be used as
exterior materials. .... .
. Brick, stone, stucco, painted or stained wood siding is to be used as the main
body of exterior materials. High grade, low maintenance materials may be
used provided they achieve the same exterior appearance as the natural
materials.
. Detailing and materials shall be consistent on all sides of the structure.
Height
. All buildings shall not exceed 40 feet in height.
Building Setback:
. 40 feet from County Road 5 for commercial buildings.
. 15 feet from Parkwood lane for residential buildings.
t\\-t t\\f\
.
1
, -.
.
.
.
Parking:
· Parking areas shall be setback 20 feet from public right-of-ways, J 0 feet from
adjacent property lineS, bermed and landscaped.
· Drives for commercial buildings shall be setback J 5 feet from public right-of-ways,
bermed and landscaped.
Landscaping:
. Areas around buildings shall be planted with deciduous and coniferous trees that
assist in blocking sight lines of parking facilities, and highlight aLL. active
architectural features of the structures. The existing planting plan established
along County Road 5 will be integrated into the landscaping of the site.
. Over-stmy deciduous trees will be used in the boulevard of Parl<wood Lane to
define the streetscape.
. 40 percent of the land area shall be in permanent maintained landscaping, open"
spaces and ponding areas.
Screening:
. Parking areas that can be viewed from adjacent roads or residential areas shall be
screened with a combination of deciduous and coniferous planting and berming.
Signage:
. Commercial signs are to be consistent with the City Sign Ordinance.
. A pylon sign is proposed for the commercial property. The guidelines for the sign
would be similar to those used for otHer banking establishments in the area and.
those specific to the County Road 5 corridor; maximum 20 feet high, 100 square
feet in area and setback 15 feet from the property line.
. Monument type directional signs may be used to clarify drive-thru and parking
locations.
· No residential signs will be used.
Utilities:
. All utilities will be underground and HV AC equipment will be screened from
view.
. Roof mounted units will be screened via roof configuration, waif extensions
either vertical or horizontal.
. Aff trash areas shaff be completely enclosed and screened from view by a
structure of a design compatible with adjacent structures and landscaping. .
Ughting:
. Site lighting will be shielded down-lighting to eliminate glare between
commercial and residential uses.
. Maximum height of parking lot lighting shaff be 20 feet.
. Walkway lighting, building lighting, site amenity and sign lighting shaff be
compatible with the adjacent residential areas.
2
.
.
~')
'-
e;;;:;;;;a
e;;;:;;;;a
~ -.-J
(BY OlHERS) 10.5' 60'
TO FACE ~ ~ TO FACE
BANK BUILDING (S CURE OF
APPROXlIAAlE REPRESENT AnON - I t
~-921~ '
--
(B"( O~)
~
0",,,.>
",Ie:... PH,
" ~ 0 "'W.
PUlLBOX
OMI-1
P.P.
0,,':>
,,1.
",I'
.I"
~E __ r\
.
~
p
(
,
--
()1
'0,,'\.".
~v
) ~ CHURCH PARKING LOT
t>" ~..,
~,o". "' /: ~v 0",0".
)" l/"
I
)
"
,.,~
~
'/
..
'I .
NOlE ~E TO BACK OF CURB
J~-' ~' I ...,,""
.;J.!!..5'
T
\J 1
~
..,"
,,1'
.')
'\IC,
~
--=----=-- -
----
--
--
- -====- -==:;:- -. -=-
----
-----
--
-~
- -=-
---
--
_\---
_0__-
STILLWATER BLVD. (CO RD 5)
o
.
~-z~
... ...
(/)
z
o
Iii
5
....
ll:
'1'1
~
a:lll:O~""
~~9;g~
~ -
>-130
>-lZIi5z
CDOt-1- ~
i ~ ~ l:l ~
<"'~6~
.15 is ll. ll: ~ ~
J- ~
fl~1I::
~o~~ ~
~~1:51il ,.,
ll.~i5~
"'Ul:i;l; ~
btj:E
d~l5 ~
~iil~}!!
fat;g:~ i
i!'~o,.,
J-iS"'i!'
h~l!s ~
>11::611> ..
~~Il1~ , ~
~~~~ . "
~l!I5i!'~.
kllJ<O:: i.
152:s'" .
:J::>-<~ ffi
_CD_=:) 0::
'l)
z
<(
...J
Cl..
III
W
eE
~~
a.t-
5::>
~o
l.,,-/I~~
....
. wZ
J:O
Vl_
,Ill
Z
W
::::;:
5
~
o
wla
zz
::5i!!:
:;
8 .
~~
~:1
o,F
II)
~
..
.; ."! -r
~~ ~ i
Ii ! *
z .. ;:
~~ ~ - ~
Cc :g
5~ ~ " I
~-: ~ ~ ;
:3~ ~ = ~
~~ ~ :-!;.
:::c = !:
Ill)
tI.lrIJ
. :Z;~
~,~~
-4~
tI.l~
5Httl NO.
1 OF 2
" .
.
~.........,. ...
~,", ',1 .
.
.'
.
...
i
D \~ I t4'N --
U \~ .~' '~. - -'.- -:::..:- - -
.:: ~---
." I I - -'':::' -' -' -' -' -.. -' ....~_. -
~. (: ----------------
~ ~;UL.. J \ fi:
x m>J...O
. "
. ~". ~2
. ~:c b
....--....
~o .
~,
.,
-@l
\
i
N~ I
0-; <IJJfII///iP
,,~ SlbVENS
\ N ENGINEERS
1858 LMNGSTONB ROAD
HUDSON. WISCONSIN 640111
SHEET DESCRIPTION
GRADING, DRAINAGE AND
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
PARKWOOD LANE
SlILLWATER. MINNESOTA
I HEREBY CERllFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED DRAWN BY MAS
BY UE OR UNDER UY DIRECT SUP~RVlSlON AND THAT CHECKED BY RAR
I AU A DULY REGIStERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
UNDER )!Mi. LAWS Of' THE STATE OF UINNESDTA. PROJECT ENCINEER JPD
( ~ ;? ." ___ PROJECT NO. 5020
. ~. t9...-.~ DATE 11/07/02
REG.~. //?'f Y~lELLLr/',,- FllOlAUE
REVISIONS
w1nr.STB\A.....)40..'\JI.....A~.COJ(
(851)438-2076 (715)888-5819
PAX:(7111)888-5879
)
.
.,-,
'-'
.
--'"
/
,
I
'<. ,.
. ,
. ,
.,
-...
.
....
./""
/
"--
,
~}
,"'-:-, I
, . ,
\.....:1
,
.
. ,
.
..
, ~
" '
. I
- -...
"
,
, ,
I '....
'~'" I
.
,
.
",-.. ..\.
.
,
I
1\ .
'./ '.
o
N
'0:
I
o
l")
...:
N
,..,
I .
Ilrl
~
L&..
o
I~
IlL.
o
~
..J
It;
I~
J;
. i"'---
I "--
...
....
..
, >.
< .
,
..
....
, .
\ "
. ,
. -
4'02. / ,;' .;'
R'S7 00' II .. " "
" !::20~gt"-i::~L
............,:' ,",,;'
.;....... .:.......
~" 80 "'ii-
I, II
" It
/.~,(
I ~:'
\' ," ,;'
\ c... \~j." ~/'
'" "
. <::> ,;;.
/ \::) ~;/'
/~,;:'
J' ~,/,
. -- <(- ..:'
.... ~ "
~. ~,/
Q.. ,;,"
" 80
"
"
.,
..
h
"
( . .p:-."
. .
.
.
.
.
.
"
;.
/20
./""
'..
(.
, -'
, ,
/
/
,
~
/ ,\, t
"
,.
\.... ,
. '
...............
"
,
e",
..........
r
ELY LINE OF LOT 5. BLOC..
NELY COR. OF LOT 5. BLOCK 2
1:10
.
. .
\'
, .
. I
-.
f ,
'.:'
v
",
(.
, "
..
. '.
, .
.
"\
4)
...
~.
-\
.........~
() -....: :10
~ ..................
i-
II
--
,
, ,
--
()'
~
'"'
~
~
~
c,
'\.
~
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
'b,
'<:>
0.,0;,'. <:>
"'>~
'V " ..:
'<:>
~.
'i7
~
~
."
~
~
'v
~
()
<0
I'":....;~':....;-.- ~___
o 30 60 90
SCALE : I INCH . 30 FEET
..............
. FOR THE PURPOSE .OF THIS SURVEY. THE IIEST
LINE OF THE SII ("".SEC. 32 T.3/J. R.20
IS ASSUMED TO 8E1oR NORTH 00 DEGREES.
50 MINUTES. 10 SECONDSIIEST.
LEGEND
,.
,
..;. ..
,
.'
~
'\
"
EXISTING CURB t GUTTER
.
IRON MONUMENT FOUND
. BOUNDARY LINE
PROPOSED LOT LINE
/
. ,
. PROPOSED CURB t GUTTER
<. ,.
I '
. ,
.,
EDGE OF GRAVEL DRIVE
- - - . PROPOSED 10 FT. DRAINAGE
AND UT I LI TY EASEMENT
UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
. RECORD DIMENSION
MEASURED DIMENSION
. POWER POLE
,\
,
~
1:10 -\
.........
......... """
-\.........
S
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(R.
~ 1
.........
.~
'.~
^'
"
.~
Connenclng at the nost southeasterly corner of SOld Lot 2: thence North 62
degrees 06 nlnutes 24 seconds West, bearings 'orlented to SOld plot along the
southerly line of SOld Lot 2. 0 distance of \80.82 Feet to on angle point In
SOld southerly line and the pOInt of beginnIng of line to be descrIbed:
thence North 20 degrees 39 nlnutes 31 seconds West. 0 distance of 144.65 Feet
to the southeasterly line of Parkwood Lone os dedicated on sold plot and SOld
line there ternlnatlng.
AND
Lot 3. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington County. Minnesota,
AND .
That part of Lots 4 t 5. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington
County. Minnesota. lying souther Iy of the follOWing descr Ibed lIne:
Connenclng at the northeasterly corner of SOld Lot 5: thence South 32 degrees
44 nlnutes 00 seconds West. along the eosterly lIne of SOld Lot 5. 0 dIstance
of 41.30 feet to the pOInt of beginning of line to be descrIbed: thence South
80 degrees 38 nlnutes 57 seconds West. 0 distance of lt5.60 feet: thence North
80 degrees 08 nlnutes 13 seconds West. 0 distance of 99.16 feet: thence North
71 degrees 49 nlnutes 26 seconds West. 0 distance of 70.tO feet to the west
lIne of SOld Lot 4 and sold lIne there terMInatIng.
AND
Outlot B. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington County. MInnesota.
(M'
Totol Boundary Area' 181.750 Sq,"Ft" or 3.71 Acres
That port of Lot. 2. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington
County. Minnesota. lying northeasterly of the follOWIng described line:
Joo
'"'
^'
~
~
()
CJ
\.
"
.
,',
'.'
/
/
1:10
"--~
...I,'~ ~...I:IE\P1tAI<YCICO"AAICPRB.OCd 11-01-02 22x34 .-.30'
..
'" tol
0 tol
0 :I:
'" G)
,..:
a:: II.
w
cc 0
:::
w
>
0
z ..
...
w ...
... :Z:'
<I: G)
Q
Z >-
0 0::
... <(
"- Z
a: I-
u ~ <(
'" ..J
UJ
Q CL
... ..J
UJ W
UJ 0::
:t: CL
'"
0
O(f)
... 0<(
u 3-1
UJ
.., ~-1
0
a: 0::: -
"-
<(>
D-
o
0::::
~
>-
... <( U
~ CD Z
uo
I
U
Z
<[
. 0
.> -
0.::=:
=.::",
~~;:; i.~
_..co till
DOQJ _."I
~.c: &Ita:
>t!!~. tJ~
...... ~.-
_.Q_o ~..
- ~ _::I
=1;:; ~:ll:
:i!!":.! ~.;
:~-:-i! ""=
..o.u. >_
. .. c ".
.1:_" c: c:_
_:;;5::1 ,.:,:
)~;;
~-
o
..
o
o ~~
l2: .. '"'
- ..i:~~
.zlDi~
o .~t:.~
l2:~ .ii=
- CD < III
>oll!:.....1>
0= ll:
fIilCDOCD::I
>:;-:m
p::...=%~
~... '"'::I
(I) 101 <"Ill
"';;;:!
~ : ~~:
IE""'" 0.. .
p::"o..1Il
~ u~
IIIl ~
...
" ,
,',
'.'
.........
. --........... /
--...........
I"---- /
I --...........
--........... .........J
.
',' - .'\
'\
,"~... I
, ,
\. )1
'\
I
I.
'""
"
, "
~ '
, ,
---..
,-,
I ','
1...", I
,'.
'.'
,
\ .1
o
N
Ie;;,
I
.
I
ItD
~
u.
o
~
~
../'
::>:
V>
U.
o
W
Z
...J
It;
l\!i
l;
",
.-'
,-'
'.
/
...
/ ' >-
,
,
,
/ /\ I
,
, I
/ ' -
,
,
- '
<.. "
, ,
"
, ,
\ "
, ,
'-
4=02' / ,;' "
R=57700'//. "
~2~.gt5' - ~;; '-.;L
-" ,,"
,;'- ,~
i.J..J ,;' 60--:(..
" II
II "
!~,/ .
"" ,;'
\ " II
'/j ~/'
jl:::),::'
j \J~//
\., j ~ .;;'
-- -- J ~./'
, Q;- "
,....., If
~' "" ,/
Q. ,;:' 60
"
"
"
1/
( /-
"--
/
o
l"l
I-
90
/20
f;
I.:JO
" -.
, .
, I
v
lW\
'. I
" ,
.-'
,-'
"\
4)
\ l..
'I, .....
...
, >
, '
,
,
~
^'
"
,,<(-
() "I.:JO
~ "
"
--
()'
~
1-
H
-\
"
~
~
~
"-
,~
l1.~
0<
w..J
Zo
-0
..JO
>-~
..JO:
w<
"'a.
o
(()
<:)
<(-
'"
~
<v
o
o
N
l"l
..,.
...
"
,
,
. '
'v
-0
()
<0
<:)
"-
"
/
"
<.. "
/\
,
<v
^'
,,"
^'''
S
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
"
<(-
<v
^'
"
~
I.:JO
"
Total Bouldary Area = 161.750 Sq. Ft. or 3.71 Acres
That part of Lol 2. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington
County. Minnesota. lying northeasterly of the following described line:
~ ~
-\
^'
~
-0
()
\"
\.
Connenclng 01 the nost soulheasterly corner of said Lot 2: thence North 62
degrees 06 nlnules 24 seconds West. beorlngsorlented to ~ald plat along the
southerly line of SOld Lot 2. a dlslance of 180.62 feet to an angle pOint In
sOld southerly line and the pOint of beginning of line to be described:
thence North 20 degrees 39 nlnutes 31 seconds West. a dl,stance of 144.65 feet
to the southeasterly line of Parkwood Lane as dedicated on said plat and said
ANDllne there ternlnot Ing..
~~6 3. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington County. Mlnnesola.
That part of Lots 4 t 5. Block 2. Long Lake Estates Second Addition. Washington
County. Minnesota. lying southerly of the following described line:
Connenclng at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 5; thence South 32 degrees
44 nlnutes 00 seconds West. along the easterly line of said Lot 5. a distance
of 41.30 feet to lhe point of beginning of line to be described: thence South
80 degrees 38 nlnutes 57 seconds West. a distance of 115.60 feet: thence North
80 degrees 08 nlnutes 13 seconds West. a distance of 99.16 feel: thence Norlh
71 degrees 49 nlnules 26 seconds West. a distance of 70.10 feet to the west
line of said Lot 4 and sOld line there ternlnat Ing.
AND
Outlol B. Long Lake Eslates Second Addition. Washington County. Minnesota.
J.o-
I.:JO
fON'T-NX..DE\PARKWOOO\PARtQ)AE5.Qcd 11-07-02 22x'" 1-.30'
I-<
N iii
0 iii
0 =
N II)
...:
a: ""
UJ
co 0
~
UJ
>
0
z I-<
iii
UJ iii
I- =
<( (/)
Cl
Z >-
0 0::
I- <(
0.. Z
a: l-
v ::2: <(
<J) .....J
UJ
Cl 0..
I- .....J
UJ W
UJ 0::
I
V> 0..
0
O(/)
I- 0<(
v 3:....J
UJ
-, ~....J
0
a: 0:: -
0..
<(>
0...
0
a::
0-
>-
I- <( U
z m
UJ Z
..J
V 0
I
U
Z
<(
)~;
0
)
~~
~"
"..;
.i-
i;
"'0>
, "'"
..
0
0 CD
...':'
Z ..CD
... . . "':S
1iI","'0
";"'i~
0 :0: 1::.0
':S <
Z f< .. .
II) . l< >-
... :o:1I)~~
:>< 01-< III
f:tJ II)=OlP
> III 0 CD II)
,.........:x:
~ ",,1iI'!'f<
D ",,=...Ill
r/J 1iI<~~
"--;i
:I:: ..1Il~<
o~!:.:s
E-< ~~j.j"
~
D Oil!:
0
lid =
Do
~
?:.
-~" ~:
.'
MEMORANDUM
January 2, 2003
TO:
FROM:
Mayor and City Council
Diane Ward, City Clerk
The Parks Board, Planning and Joint Cable Commissions are required to
have Council representatives.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Discuss and pass a motion to Cll-'I-'oint one Councilmember representative
to serve on the Parks Board, Planning and Joint Cable Commission.
.
.,
"
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
January 2, 2003
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
SUBJECT: BOARD/COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
DISCUSSION:
At their December 1 ih meeting Council tabled appointments to the following
commissions to the January 7,2003 meeting for further information or discussion by the new
Council.
Human Riqhts
(should have 7 members - needs 5 members appointed)
Jeff Anderson - is not reapplying
Louise Watson - done
Anthony Carr - wants to be reappointed - Ward 2
Michael Eldred - new applicant - Ward 1
Dan Cox - new applicant (student) - Ward 2
Rick Johnson - new applicant - Ward 3
Park & Rec.
As a result of Council representative appointments there is an opening on the Parks Board.
have received an application from Paul Donna - new applicant - Ward 4.
P/anninq
(should have 9 members - needs 3 members)
Glenna Bealka - is not reapplying
Dave Middleton - wants to be reappointed - Ward 4
Dave Peroceschi - wants to be reappointed - Ward 1
Jeanne Anderson - new applicant - Ward 1 (additional material received)
Nick Kalambokidis - new applicant - Ward 2
Kirk Roetman - new applicant - Ward 2
Librarv
(should have 9 members - needs 3 members appointed)
Mary Lou Rice Gorski - wants to be reappointed
Richard Hodsdon - wants to be reappointed
Andrea Tipple - wants to be reappointed
Joint Cable Commission (should have 3 members)
~
A primary member must be an elected official.
The "Alternate" member currently is Taco Bealka. Mr. Bealka is also a member of the Chart.
Commission and he can only serve on one commission. Mr. Bealka has indicated that he
wishes to retain his position on the Charter Commission; therefore, the "Alternate" member
position is open for appointment.
Lynae Finney - new applicant
ACTION REQUIRED:
Review and decide appointments and pass a motion adopting resolutions for appointments to
boards/commissions.
.
.
//
-----/
.""--
.
.
.
_\I1emorandum '
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council
Diane Ward, City Clerk
1/2/03
Election of Vice Mayor
DISCUSSION:
As required by City Charter, Article VI, Section 6.02, the Council must elect one of
the members to be vice mayor who will act as Mayor Pro Tempore during the
temporary absence or disability of the Mayor.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Elect a vice mayor and adopt Resolution No. 2003- , DESIGNA liNG COUNCIL
VICE~MA VOR FOR 2003.
.f'
"
· Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor and City Council\n~
Steve Russell, Community Develvptuent Director I ~
I?ecember 27,2002
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application for 2003
The attached CDBG application requests assistance for low and moderate income homeowners in
the North Hill Public Improvement Project Area. The program, as proposed, would be a three
year CDBG Program providing approximately $300,000 of assistance. The assistance would be
targeted to low and moderate income homeowners.
Recommendation: Approval of CDBG application for 2003 and authorize submittal
of application (resolution).
.
.
RESOLUTION 2003-
APPROVAL OF 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
APPLICATION
WHEREAS, the CDBG application requests assistance for low and moderate
income homeowners in the North Hill Public Improvement Project area; and
WHEREAS, the program would be a three?year CDBG program providing
approximately $300,000 of assistance.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, approves the 2003
CDBG application, authorizes the submittal of the application, and the Acting Mayor is
authorized to sign said Agreement.
Adopted by Council this 7th day of January 2003.
Mayor
AI I cST:
Diane F. Ward, City Clerk
....
.
.
.
.
Washington County, Minnesota
2003 CDBG Grant Program
Application for Assistance
I. General Information
Applicant Name: City of Stillwater
Contact Person NamelTitle: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
Address: 216 North Fourth Street
Phone: (651)430-8821
Fax: (651)430-8810
City: Stillwater
E-Mail: srussell@ci.stillwater.mn.us
State/Zip: MN 55082
Alternate Contact: Larry Hansen
Phone: (651)430-8801
II. Project Information
Project Title: North Hill Public Improvement Project
Project Description: Improve storm and sanitary sewer, water, roads and other public facilities in the North Hill area, an area with
many long time City residents on fixed incomes. This project is proposed as a 3-year CDBG project, 2002-2004. The assistance
would be provided to qualified low and moderate income households for public facility improvements (copy of project feasability
. study attached).
Project Location: See attached map
Which Eligible Activity Will Your Project Meet?
o Acquisition of real property
IlilI Public facilities and ~l'~ovements
o Clearance and demolition
o Rehabilitation
o Code enforcement
o Historic preservation
o Home ownership assistance
o Activities related to economic development
o Renovation of closed buildings
o Lead-based paint testing and abatement
o Planning
Which Type of CDBG Funds Are You Requesting?
Amount Requested:
.
o Competitive Grant funds
IlilI Formula Allocation funds (available only to cities and townships)
$
$ 93.654.63 (2002), 3 vear nroiect
Page 1 of 6
What Are Your Total Project Costs?
$ 5.9 Million
Which National Objective Will Your Project Meet? .
181 Benefitting Low and Moderate Income Persons (if you check this box, you must check one category
below and answer the associated questions)
o Area Benefit (at least 36.7% of people in the area served must be low- to moderate-income)
A. In what Census Tract(s) and Block Group(s) do beneficiaries of your project live? (include maps)
B. How many residents live in this area?
C. What is the percentage of low and moderate income beneficiaries?
D. What documentation did the Agency use?
o HOD Data
o Survey (If a survey was used, please attach completed survey.)
Ill! Limited Clientele (at least 51% of the people served must be low- to moderate-income)
A. How many people do you anticipate serving in the upcoming year? 10-20
B. Of those people, how many will be served with CDBG funds? 10-20
c. Does this project benefit any specialized population such as:
o Disabled
Ill! Elderly
o Homeless
o Other (Please explain) Most of the households needinll assistance are lonll-time City residents on
fixed incomes
.
o Housing
o Economic Development (at least 51% ofthejobs must be made available to low- or moderate-income
people and onejob must be createdfor every $25,000 infunds)
o Reduce or Eliminate Slum or Blight: (if you check this box, you must check one category below)
o Area Basis (please include census track map or survey results)
o Spot Basis (please attach photos of the project)
.
o Urgent Need
Page 2 of 6
III. Project Benefit:
Individuals
Households
. Number ofIndividualslHouseholds to Benefit from Project:
How Many Low- to Moderate-IndividualslHouseholds to Benefit?
10-20
5-10
How Will Income Be Verified?
IllI Income Verification Request Forms
o Presumed Benefit (HUD presumes the following to be principally low and moderate income: abused children, battered
spouses, elderly persons, severely disabled persons, homeless persons, persons living with AIDS, migrant farm workers)
o Census Track Data
o Survey
o Other (Please explain)
IV. Priority Needs
A. Which Housing or Community Development Category Best Describes Your Project?
(note: HUD requires that projects meeting high priority needs be funded before those meeting medium or low priority needs)
.
High Priority Needs - Housing
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Renter, sm. related, very low income
Renter, sm. related, low income
Renter, 19. related, very low income
Renter, 19. related, low income
Renter, 19. related, moderate income
Renter, elderly, very low income
Renter, elderly, low income
Owner, very low income
Owner, low income
Special populations
Medium Priority Needs - Housing
o Renter, sm. related, moderate income
o Renter, elderly, moderate income
o Owner, moderate income
High Priority Needs - Cvu..uunity Development
o Parks / recreation facilities
IllI Water / sewer improvements
IllI Street improvements
IllI Sidewalks
IllI Sewer improvements
o Youth centers
o Planning
Medium Priority Needs - Cvu..ml1lity Development
o Neighborhood facilities
IllI . Flood drain improvements
IllI Other infrastructure needs
o Crime awareness programs
o Other anti-crime programs
o Child care centers
o Senior centers
o Other senior projects
o Cuu..uercial / industrial rehab
B. Describe Why Your Project Fits Into This Category.
The North Hill improvement project will provide low/moderate income households with public health and safety improvements.
They can not afford without assistance.
.
Page 3 of 6
v. Project Budget
Total Project Cost: $ 5.9 million
Total CDBG Funds: $ 93.654.63
Percent of CDBG Funds in Total Cost: 1.5
,
Expenses* (please itemize)
Total Costs
CDBG Funds Requested
Easement acauisition
$ 327.000
$ 1.172.277
$ 633.100
$ 1.526.565
$ 712.900
$ 1.527.253
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
.
Street revo~truyn9~
Stonn sewer construction
Sanitarv sewer construction
Water main construction
Ene:ineerine:, administration, contine:encv
$
$
Total: $ 5,899,095
* Please itemize project expenses, using the following as applicable to your project:
· Acquisition and Improvement Costs
including purchase price, closing costs, site improvements, clearance of toxic contaminants, and other acquisition and iu't'." .'ement costs
· Construction/Rehabilitation Costs
including site improvements, construction (labor, materials and supplies). installation, permits and other construction/rehabilitation costs
· Professional Fees and Personnel Costs
including architectural, engineering and code inspection fees, surveys, appraisals, legal fees, hazardous materials surveys, project management, and other
professionaVpersonnel fees
Other Development Costs
including relocation, financing costs, environmental reviews, environmental studies, and other development costs
· Eligible Costs for Planning Projects .
including professional services, project management costs, and other planning costs
Page 4 of 6
I
.
.
.
..'
Complete for Acquisition an
stantial Rehabilitation Only
lBR
2BR
3BR
4BR
Maximum Rent - FMR (Fair Market Rent)
Monthly Contract Rent
Number of Units
Size (sq. ft.)
VI. Narrative
1. What is the goal of this project? The goal of the project is to improve the quality of City public facility service to an area of
the City that currently has substandard facilities.
2. Who will benefit from this project? The low/moderate income households, the North Hill neighborhood and the broader City
of Stillwater.
3. Applicants requesting both Formula Allocation funds and Competitive Grant funds: Describe how receiving
Competitive Grant funds (as a supplement to Formula Allocation funds) will benefit the proposed project.
Describe how the project will be implemented if Competitive Grant funds are not awarded.
Applicants requesting only Competitive Grant funds: Describe your organization and the extent and length of
experience the organization has in developing, managing, and/or administering similar activities.
Page 5 of 6
,""
,
VII. Certification
\
I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct and that it contains no misrepresentations,
falsifications, intentional omissions, or concealment of material facts. I further certify that no contracts have been awarded, funds.
cvu..uitted or construction begun on the proposed project, and that none will be prior to issuance of a Release of Funds by the
program administrator,
Signature of Authorized Official
Date
Name of Authorized Official
Wally Milbrandt
, Title
Acting Mayor
.
.
Page 6 of 6
,~.:
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 932
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 30.01, SUBD. 8
BY AMENDING THE FEES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILL WATER DOES ORDAIN:
Subdivision 1. AMENDING. Stillwater City Code Capter 30.01, Subdivision 8 is amended by
deleting the following provision:
Effective January 1,2000, the fee for collection per month shall be as follows:
For each 30-gallon container .........,..,..... ............. .,...... ........ ....... .......$ 9.80
For each 60-gallon container ..........................................,..................$11.59
For each 90-gallon container......... ................ .............. ...... """"'" .....$13.45
Adjusted accounts,................,........................... .........,............... .....,. ,$ 7.35
For each extra 30.gallon bag.......... ............ ...... ..,.., ............ ........ ..." ...$ 1.50
F or recycling services........................................................,............... $ 1. 65
and adding the following provision in place of the deleted language:
"The fees for collection per month are established by the City Council in the agreement
negotiated with the City's hauler.
Subdivision 2. SAVINGS. In all other ways, the Stillwater City Code and Chapter 30 shall
remain in full force and effect.
Subdivision 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective from and after its
adoption and its publication, whichever occurs last.
Enacted by the City Council this 21 st day of January 2003.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Diane F . Ward, City Clerk
Published:
Stillwater Gazette
January XX, 2003
.
.
.
Memorandum
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Diane Ward, City Clerk
Date:
January 3, 2003
Subject:
Set date for canvass of returns for Special Election
DISCUSSION:
The Special Election will be held Tuesday, January 28, 2003. Minnesota
Election Law 205.185 Subd. requires the canvass of returns to be done within seven (7)
days (before 5 p.m. on February 4).
RECOMMENDATION:
I would recommend that the date for canvass of returns of Special Election be one of
the following dates:
Thursday, January 30, 2003 at 7:30 a.m.
Tuesday, February 4, 2003 at 4:30 p.m.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Set date and time for canvass of returns of Special Election.
.
.
.
.
MemorancUffi
To:
Mayor and City Council
Klayton Eckles, Director of Public Works
December 13,2002
From:
Date:
Subject: Review and Update on Public Works Facility Change Orders and Final Contract Costs
DISCUSSION
.
The Public Works Facility Project is 99% completed, The work remaining includes some site
work that cannot be completed until spring, corrective actions in the main building, and
potentially an addition of a small overhang over one of the exit doors, Attached is a contract
summary change sheet and a change order request log. The change order request log shows a
net contract increase of$76,683. Ifthis is modified to remove items that were requested by the
City and not a result of unforeseen conditions during construction, the amount quickly goes to
the City's favor. As shown on the change order request log if we ignore the salt and sand
building and the telemetry system that is being paid for by the sewer fund, the total change
orders to date are approximately $65,000 in the City's favor. Ifwe also remove the fuel island,
an item added after the project was started, the change orders are a net positive of a $120,000 in
the City's favor.
Change order #12, hopefully the final change order, will formally be presented at the next
Council meeting. It will include the 13 highlighted items on the change order request log plus
an additional item for wall furnishings of approximately $2800. The result should be a final
change order of about $16,000 presented to the City Council at the next meeting along with the
semi-final payment request from Dew Corporation.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Council pass a motion directing staff to prepare change order document
#12 and bring the final invoice for the base contract from Dew Corporation to the next council
meeting.
.
Stillwater Public Works Facility
Contract Change Summary
PR / ASI/ Cost Date Cost
Item # RFI # Description Reason Submitted Submitted A'ppr()v.:<~d Status
1 _._.J'_R_ 1 _ ,!,!e~ast to block. wall panel chan~ 1 $ (193.149) _11/07/01~'!_jHJ3.149)_CO #1 __
2 PR 2 Va-riou.~,,,i',a-,,ges fromlJian revi"w 4 $ 42.878 01/22102 $ 42.878 'CO #3
~ ---RFI 3~c;iC~nditi~~ MH 1 3 ;$-3.276' 01/04/02' $ 2.978 'CO #2
-4' - . ' DE><1.u_ctfor permit costs 1 $ (28.598). 01/22/02. $ (28.598) CO #3
5 "-R Ll'.!ovide 2stop elevator in lieu of 3 stop 4 $ (3.095)' 01/22/021 $ (3.095)iCO #3
6 ASI 7_S~!,g~to mason'l'.'Nalls 1 i $ 673. 01/25/02' $ 673 !CO #4
L__..sg_R,9,__A<l(j~ilT1!"ex ~ck 1 $ 281 04/02/02. $ 250 .CO #5
. 8._--"'-R..~_,~C~"!,g~_"-t.,, window 127 and door 27 1: $ 806. 03/11/02 i $ 8()6 i CO #5
9 PR 6 Provide Metal Wall Panel for Salt/Sand 1 i $ 4.284' 04/02/02' $ 4,284 i CO #5
10 ---'pR~,-'.P.It"';:n!ltiv~r:()()fi,:,gsystematlowslopeareas 5: $ 19,321 05/06/02' S 18,160 [CO#7
11 Fuel Island 1 , $ 64,731 06/07/02 $ 64,731 :CO #6
-12---' PR10--Revisions to fioor finish materials --'---1--~$- -=Jlt?~f=06717I02T~(~,~~)'CO #7
_...1.3__. .- -.. cr~<.!iiIo~l~b-"cated ~hies ladder --~--_L_-<!&~L...96/17/02 LL_j!c611~U;;() #7
14 Additional fire extinquisher and cabinet . 4 $. 90. 06/17/02' $ . 90 'l-U #f
15 ,piovide:.a~ition~~EIl"'OOd & insulation _-=,__-:-:!_-=:=!~,__ 8,635-__.:::Q~19/02T=":]'-,-635 :CO #7
16 - Provide ~alt~~-,,-~dJ3tor~g~.!'.ll~!Iit~____ ~_,~_,_2_~,OQ.0 __(HI12/()~..J__~43,000 ,CO IIa
____!r.._ ,--,- -_Ielern".lrysy5:t"nl...,______,______ 1 _$_ 140,201 _07/31/02 $_140,2~:C0#9_
18 ,AS127 ".B"lIardS and HM changes 1 ~: $ - 2,9'2'8' 07114/02, $ -- 2,928 [CO #10
--..!~= =":'_=_Re~~~t3}~tfugsfOr SP-l 2~-Ts-'-- ~~4. 07/23/02' $ 874lCO #10
20 . Provide stainless duct in wash bal 2. $ 842 08/21f02 $ 842 :CO #10
=.11=--=== :- ',:~odit,.:dLJ~t~Ga;:age for MUA & Exh",!~ ~[$---3:zoT-08721/0T$-3:207ico #10
22 ______}vfO_difyQI-l..dc>or tr~ck & operator at door 61 5: $ 2, 132.._,~~21/02 J.~.1}2_L~O #10 _
,-n--__,__F'aint_ce.ilingi!'g.<'t:a9.~___ -i--....1~L.$__Jl.921 07/23/~2, $ ~21,.f()...!10
--~<I..----", MO(jify,w.!!1clO\\i at receotion ! 1 ' $ 488' 10/07/02 $ 488 1 CO #10
25 --~,u____,l\dclf.ti9,n,,!~..clJit and device for portable lift 1, $-926. 10/09/02 $ 926 ! CO #10
26 _~______.__,:..M()dification wall & ducts at mech room #203 12 '-L,__SQ73 i 09/09/02' $ 2.073 ico #10
-~!..._,c___, - __-,\ddi~()n.a-'-tl(l~gers for~l'!inkler -~----~~___:_$__2~468 10/09/02 $ 2,468 ,CO #10
28 Provide chase foroil sink drain i 1 , $ 357 . 10/09/02 $ 357 ! CO #10
~29-- --- ---Mo\lesIrU~iliatE"r;;irig-[()r_~rll.~__-=-==.l__.J____i_ $. _. ~~ 757:"_.!91Q9/cg_~____..!,5J i CO #10
30Changebreakers forSiren , u 1. ; $' 281' 10/09/02 $ 281 ,CO #10
=~~~, .'~r~~ii~ed~~zai~~~;f;~~~:rn~~~_~~"=~~==~a,:".JJ~{==l~&i~Er-:-H~}jgg :~~
_...3.3____ -- -,- ,F'royide.2:i..rigat~'!iine and RPZ to ball field i 11 $ 3,929' 10/13/02' $ 3.929 ICO #11
34 ----,-.P.BE3_~_Ligl1tirlgatwashbay. 1S--i$-2~154' 12/03/02, $ 2,gi~[.gOIt11
35 ,Add man door at wash ba)l L 4 1$ 2,777: 12/03/021 $ 2,777 !CO#11
36 " ---'-ReiocaieFOC-----'-___ -: 4 I $-4ii--12/03/02T$-----421-rCO#11
-37-~==:=___~C~editiorpaverl~:slajjation -and stee~irlg -:~-1--=[f:=---l2~Ol~L_.l2ZQ3t02. $ _~j~4..CO #11
_~8 --_~d<l.ed_~!'ouJltic,al~~ir1g _ : 2 j $ 328 12/03/021 $ 3281CO#11
39 ~__~/c:>.ca.!e. feed and disconnect for elevator . 5 I $ 348 I 12/03/02, $ 348 I CO #11
40ASI #.32 (relocate unit heaters) I 1 i $ (1,573) 12/03/021 $ ..J.!2.?:~~CO #11
41---'-,____cF'rovide urethane foam at various locations I 1 --U~--...3285L'!...2/Q.3/02 i-~~"585 l~O #11
42______9_m~ lJl1it Pri~"-W'O-"<-------L.---.!.___!JuJ~9.416L_~!..o}~cg+-L~{29,41~w:0 #11
- 43 1______,!'~#8_,___ 1 1 f $. 1.913 I 04/26/02, $ .1,913 iCO#11
44 ------ -- .PB!I~J~orre~on tCl.Cha"g,,_Order AmountLL_c=rT,__-=.:T@uC---0~iii6io2": $_ -- -~161_ic:o #11
-'--.;,~--,---.Beroute_~a.te.!dl(lsandSprinkleratwashbay. 5! $ 6.158' . 12/03/02, $ 6,158Ico#12
---~--- ..f.J\ddi~()~(lI_~k for ASI #29 - . ____-T-- r-S'----{930--' 12103/02i $ 1.930 :CO #12
.. u'!? O,mit Un~t Pric,e.!:Vo..I<.(~rt1f - -_ -:1=':=-:'-=[~=-=-(1.6!Q86L-=i:22?~?:] _(16.086) I CO #12
u,-,4.ll.-u..._,Acl<litionalgranu.!tl.' iJT1E.ort per 12/16/01 LOU---'__..?~L,L_~4.96_ -!1~.2!.f().2J $ 9.496 ICO #12
49---------_-'-Modify_I~,Heate..rTlountinginroOml03 f 5 i$. 6,725 12/27/02!$ 6.725iCO#12
50 : . :Misc, electrical changes 1~n-4;oo6---12/27/02TS--4:906rCO #12
~1-==--=~=~'3emoY~.!'r1d.!.E!locate ftuejor UH.:3....... r-----n---l :47~:!_=12i27102r_s_ 1,470 i CO #12
52 ~----,.F:lJ.ll1i~handinstallfiredepartmentlockbox 4 1$ 151 i 12/30/02'.$ 1511CO#12
53 ; -----'-~radley 300 at Myrtle Lift Station 1 ...lL 676 I 12/30/021 $ 6761CO #12
54 'Provide 24" x 24" plaque 1 I $ 800 [12/30/02$ 800 CO #12
55 iCredit for work comeleted bJl.Ei!Jlforces 2 IJ 16.175\ 01l02/0~..L~~)}CO #12
56 fModifysouth end of valley gutter 1 $ 1.930: 01/02/03 [ $ 1.930ICO#12
57 ---------rProvide and install two ohotoelectric eyes 1 $ 785 f 01/02/03: $ 785 ICo #12
58 _LEarthwork at City ditch west of site 1 $ 1,275 I 01/02/03: $ 1.275 tCO#12
Totals I i . , "
i
Original Contract Amount $
Approved Change Orders $
New Contract Amount $
Approved Cost Awaiting Change Orders $
Contract Amount w/AII Approved Chances $
----._~-.---~---------~~~
4,585,608
320,844
4.906,452 I
- i-.
4.906.452 ,
-----~-----_.
1
2
3
4
5
6
70%}
4%
1%
14%
11%
0%1
100%1
Change Orders
1 $ (193.149)
2 $ 2.978
3 $ 11.185
4 $ 673
5 $ 5,340
6 $ 64.731
7 $ 17.476
8 $ 243,000
9 $ 140,201
10 $ 27.254
11 $ (12.886)
12 $ 14.041 .
Total $ 320,844
1 of 1
As of: 1/2/2003
.
.
.
Stillwater Public Works Facility
Change Order Request (COR) Log
.
Amount Amount
COR # Description Submitted; Approved : Date Submitted Status
1 PR#l $ (193.149)L.LJ193.149)-', 11107101 CO#l
~-=:'::-=-=~'ijR-#2 -=--==--_ $ 51.507 ! ,12/18101 Rejected for revisions
2R PR #2 $ 42.878T$-'42,87S----o1122102 CO #3
'-----3'RFI #3'- $ 3.276 : $ 01103102 Rejected
'--3RRF~~- $ 2.9781 $ 2,978 '. ______01104102 CO #2
- , __.i.Qeductforoermilcosts $ (28.598): $ (28.598) 01/22/02 CO #3
--=. __5 PR #3 2 stop elevator in lieu of 3 stops- (3.095): $ (3.09~) -'- 01/22102 CO #3
6 ASI # 6 - Thickened slab for hoist '-$- '-- 482 i $ -, ----01125/02 Rejected
nfK~]it'-:<:'~a~~t~sJo...l'!l1l~onry walls--------- ..i--613'-$--- 673 _ 01125102 co #4
n____8..ER#,5__,____ - -- fu'-- 806: $ 806, -. -""-03111102CO#5
--. _9 Addition ..2f_Simplex Lock ,-'$"--- 281 ,$""-"250- -, ---03/25102 CO #5
10 Provide Metal Wall Panel for Salt/Sand ---$-'--4.284"'$~84. ------04102102 co #5
-==~~'-'jp-R.II~~==,-='::-'::"':'- - ,_ _~_ _.1~1~-1.._ .h9!.'f-=-__-':::::=~o~2.E'li)2'co#11
,l.?P_RP1.__,_ -_____ $ -19.321: $ 18.160 ,- 05106102 CO#ll ($1.1611..
13 PR #10 --~----$--'ii;726) $(7.726">- - -r56/17i02 co #7
,__J..4Fu~!'-slarl~____ '$ -64;731 i $ 64.731 ,----06117ioicO #6
--- _J5(~~E1clitfo!..!a~i~~d ships ladder in lieu of Alum_ . - $ -- n:683Y$-,1':683j' - - '--06117/02 CO p7
-- _.16.A.dditi~~lJire .E1xtinguisher and cabinet , $ ----- __90~-n-90' -, --06-i17IOi-co #7
- 17 Cost to relocate venlfor flammable waste. .-,- -$--"1:698;-$ .,-,-. '06/17/0i'Rejectect--
=~==-- f8}'TC;vici.e ad~.ili.~~!jJ!YWo~ sheathing~.!rl.SlJI,----_T__ __ 8~~~==- $_!l,~5=L-==-Jl~7i~]Juo #7
19 ASI#27 - Sollards. HM changes , $ ,...2.928. $ 2.928 ' 07/14102 CO #10
=-"':=_20 ~Rj;inoveiOotin~is---=--- --=--====--' T' ,-' . -874'$ 874- - 07123i02 co #10
,-- ___2..1.E'a~"-I.c_e.~ir1_gJ.r1..g~.@ge -$---9~921-n-9,921-c---~-Oir23102,gO #10
__,__.?.?I.eI.E1..~try~ystem $'- 140.201:-$-M0,20'--- - -07/3-1102 co #9
- -- _2.3Iv!()clity,du~t..~arks D~partment -----___~~~_=_i.'3J8-$'---'---- ~=~~..::.~-=-i[8].?1JQ2 Rejected
,13 R~o.ditycl!Jct at Par~.p..E!p<l!lment$ - ~.'.648_' $ -- ..::.__,___09f()!1/0.?_,B~jected
- 24 R2 _Mo.<lify,clUC!.~~ Par,ks Department $ -, 1.931 :-$ 1.931 ., 12/03102 CO #11
___'::__.2.~F'rovidE!stainles,.-d-uct at wash bay --$---' 842' $ 842T-----OSI21102CO #10
25 Modify duct at Garage for MUA & Exhaust $ 3.207 ; $ 3.207 I " 08/21102 CO #10
u -26 Modify OH door track & operator at door 61 ., $ ,2.132--:$-------:z:13T- ---- 08/21/02 co #10
- - =~~ 2T~0~ghi;; futu~erestiooms at 2nd floor-- -- , S'-'--'2:B9s'T- .. _ -T --, 08/21702 Bejected
-- 28' Provide RPZ required by Water Dep!. ' $---2)00 "'$-~-----o9709/02 R~ected
---28R-provideRPz';:;q;Jirediiy Water Dept.-$ -"1~574--$------'-;5i4T -- -12103m'2 co 1111
---- 29 Change breakers for Siren ~$ 281 i $ 281 T-----10i09102 CO #10
30~odificatio':'-wall & ducts at mech room #203 :-.L- 2.073 i $ 2,073--L......._OJllQ~Q.L~Qit10
31 Modifywindowatreceolion $ " 488 $ 488 ",,10107102 CO#10
----32-Additional circuit and device for portable lift --:f .. -"92-6 --$-----~126;-- - .. -10io9i02"Ceiliw
:=-33~t.dC!iij(;;l~~.rl!:jers for sprinkler $--' T46a:-$ -2,46S----_=_ -10io-9/02-CO #10--
34 Provide chase for oil sink drain ---$ - .- - '-35Ti-$'-----'35i'[---- - -:'0109102 CO #10
35 Move-structural framing for crane ' --'$-----757--$ 757 . ,---10/09102'- co #10
-36 - Prc)vide 2; iITigationline and RPZ to ball field--- $ - -- -3.929-: $ 3.929---- -= 10/13/02co #11
37 Add canopy at door13 -:-- ,--'-s-- 5.269T'----:- - - -- 10121i02 Rejected
.. '-38Painl ';t1-03:106 &-107 ----------'--S'-z7,1"s2'T--- ,- m -'---11/04IOicRejected
---- 40-R 'FiR E3-= Li9- at washi)ay.- ___ . .$~~-2.154--;-$ - ,,2.154 :------'12io3i02'CO#11
.:~.,__~4I[I1~roi!e__, arlch'iMi1kfe,.raliWa$tilffi;Vl&li;j.'~;[$";';~S6;t~~I$'''''6;t58;Bt/,t,-Jg[Q~lQ.?LQ.tiliQge'Or'Oell#12;~
42 Add man door at wash bay . $ 2.777 [$ 2,777 i 12103102CO#11
--43Relocate FDC- r-$----421~4211-12103/02, CO #11
- 44 Credilforpaverinsta"ationandsteeledg~_<.?,018)' $ (2.018): 12/03/02 CO#ll
--- ~~_~cl.d.E!..d acoustic,!I~~g $ 328 . $ 328 : 1.21.Q.3~Q2 CO #11
46 Reloc'!te feE1cl And disconnect for elevator i $ 348 i $ 348 ~! 2/03102. CO #11
47A~#32(.r..elocateunitheaters) [$ (1.573):$ (1.573)1 12/03102CO#11
48 Provide urethane foam at various locations ! $ 3.585 i $ 3.585 : 12/03102 CO #11
-".", '4ilJAililmo~l.wQfgJQi;ASI #~9]1i~~1~.IiiU! i~~t;'lfff_~9M'~~~1~~2/03102rChanQe,0I'ae't:':#.'f !.".~_.
500milUnitPriceWork : $ (29.416 i $ (29.416)1 12/03/02 ,CO #11
,o/,\,~: ' :51 [OmifUnit 2/2ZlfJ2
· 521Ji,ooi,tiOnal. 2127:102
53IMoilifyIR12J27t02
SP;ff''-' 54IMisc:ele 12/27/02
<!'Pi 551 Remove a 12/27102 0
ig:)\'i,'" 561Fumish aridmsraCfir 12/30/02 C
'.!!7j[;. i,~',',",.57tAl.i,Ei'n,", Bra 12/30/0,2 C
i'KJi,;j,,,, 581Provide 2 2/30/02 C
~t.,,~&~ 591Creoitfor 1102/03 0
60 I MooifY so 1/02/03
61!Pro\(ide an01/02/03, C
; 61t'Eai'thworkal .01/02/03[0
.
.
As of: 1/2/2003
.
..'-
.
Dear Mr. Kriesel-
My name is David Riehm. I am a 13 year old Star Scout :from Ward 4, and I am writing
this letter to tell you what I think. about the proposed measure to give the City of Stillwater
unlimited liquor licenses. What Famous Dave's is proposing, Mr. Kriesel, is not simply a measure
designed to give it a hard liquor license. This measure would cause significant changes in the way
restaurants are planned around here, and the consequences of this would be disastrous. The
increased availability of liquor would make it easy for underage drinkers to obtainalcoho~ and
even the legal sale of liquor would hurt everyone but the vendors. Drunk driving and other forms
of<lrugac1diction woUld become mote common; arid ViOIencewotiId aIsO go on theupnse, tlianks
to the in",~o;..aSe in drinking ofthe major "~laJ.ler drug", alcohol. The types of businesses and
institutions set up in this town would take a turn for the worse, and our reputation would follow.
In short, the measure would mean. nothing good and everything bad fur the city.
The limitation of liquor licenses was put into effect for a reason, and we have no better
one to dismantle it. Please, use all political influence at your disposal to discourage voters to vote
for this measure. If that fails, enact a system to scrutinize requests forlicenses, or anything else
within your power, but please, don't let this just slip by.
SincerelY'fj ~ ~
~,
.
.
.
..
~.
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
January 3, 2003
The Honorable Jay Kimble
Mayor, City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th St.,
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Ma~ ,) Q '(
The Metropolitan Council recently approved grants to local units of government for assisting
with the clean-up of polluted sites. These grants are funded through the Council's Livable
Communities program Tax Base Revitalization Account.
I am pleased to inform you that the Metropolitan Council approved a grant of $124, 159 to
clean soils for the Lofts of Stillwater project on Main St. This grant was one of the twelve
polluted site remediation projects approved last week.
Currently through this Livable Communities account, the Council has approved nearly $42
million for 119 projects in 25 communities throughout the region. These funds have helped
or will help to clean up more than 940 acres of polluted land. The new businesses placed on
these sites will create approximately 11,419 jobs and increase the tax base in the region by
more than $28 million through private investment of nearly $1.5 billion.
The Metropolitan Council is excited about working with local communities through the
Livable Communities program. The state Legislature created the program in 1995 to link
jobs, housing and transit in the region. Working in partnership on this program we know we
can build better communities and a stronger region. This will help improve the quality oflife
for all our citizens.
Congratulations on the award of this grant, and do not hesitate to contact me whenever you
rs to iscuss regional issues.
{;}C~ ~/
T tl Mondale, L
etropolitan Council
www.metrocouncil.org Metro Info Line 602~1888
230 East Fifth Street . St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626 . (651) 602-1000 . Fax 602-1550 . TIT 291,0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Chair Untiedt
Call To Order
Agenda:
Minutes:
Treasurer:
Attorney--';'
Planner:
Engineer:
Clerk:
Committees:
8:00 PM
Old Business
New Business:
Adjourn
01/03/2003
..
Stillwater Township
January 9, 2003
Stillwater Town Hall
~
7:00 P.M.
.
Regular Meeting
Adopt
Approve Minutes December 9,2002 Regular Town Board Meeting
1. Report
2. Checks and Claims
3. Discuss Auditors Bids
4. Discuss State of Building Inspection
1. Montanari Escrow
1. Ludack Screening
1. Stonebrige Trail Report
2. Hart Right-of-Way Update
I. Misc.
.
1. Report Park Status-Hiniker
2. Advertise Two Planning Commission Positions
I. Denise Remick Re: Mapping
1. Town Hall Use
.
Pat Bantli
"
.
December 12, 2002
STILLWATER TOWN BOARD ME!: IlNG
Town Hall
7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson Duane Laabs, Supervisors Sheila-Marie
Untiedt, Ken laBoda, Jim Doriott and David Johnson.
Also, Attorney Tom Scott, Engineer Paul Pearson,
Planner Dick Thompson and Treasurer Gloria Sell.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P Johnson/LaBoda moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(4 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Johnson/LaBoda moved to approve the 11/14/02 Stillwater
town board meeting minutes as written. (4 ayes)
M/S/P Doriott/LaBoda moved to approve the 11/19/02 planner interview meeting
minutes as written. (4 ayes)
3. TREASURER-
. 1. Checks #16055 thru #16092 were reviewed and approved.
2. Monthly report given.
3. The treasurer is interviewing auditors for the 2002 audit. (January 9 agenda)
4. Board of review date is April 17, 2003 from 5 p.m. - 6 p.m. in the town hall.
5. M/S/P Johnson/LaBoda moved to transfer the oak wilt fund balance to the
general fund. (4 ayes)
7:45 p.m. Sheila-Marie Untiedt arrived.
6. Jim Doriott mentioned that cost of materials for the septic system safety
cover was $98.70.
7. M/S/P LaBoda/Doriott moved to transfer $14,092.66 from the town hall
renovation fund to the general fund. (5 ayes)
4. ATrORNEY-
1. The Dwight Carlson lot line adjustment was approved for recording and
signed by the chair.
2. Regarding the negative balance in the Montanari escrow fund, he is to be
notified that the balance must be kept current or the building inspector will
be instructed to hold up permits.
3. It was mentioned that the treasurer's background check has been received
and is in order.
.
5. PLANNER-
1. Mr. Thompson will communicate with Mark Ludack (9530 North Stonebridge
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 12/12/02
Page Two
,
Trail) about screening that needs to be of a year round type. Mr. Ludack .
relayed to Jim Doriott that he has planted several maple trees near the
building that needs to be screened.
6. ENGINEER-
1. The Benshoof report re: Stonebridge Trail was discussed. It will be further
reviewed at a later date.
2. The engineer will contact Kyle Elmquist and Holly Hart at 9727 Primrose
Avenue (Boomsite Estates) about pillars in the road easement.
3. It will be mentioned in the newsletter that other than qualifying mailboxes,
there should be no construction in road easements.
4. Regarding township planning records held by MFRA, the supervisors request
that they be brought to the town hall at the next meeting.
7. COMM111 EE APPOINTMENTS - M/S/P Johnson/Untiedt moved that Carole Yoho
be re-appointed to the planning commission and Rod Hunter and Karen Sherrick be
re-appointed to the park committee. (5 ayes)
We will advertise for more planning commission members.
8. PUBLIC USE POLICY - M/S/P La Boda/Unitedt moved approval of a public use .
policy for the town hall as attached to these minutes. (5 ayes)
9. PARK PROJECT PRO<.?RESS - Jim Hiniker reviewed the progress. He believes the
park will be ready for use in the spring.
10. MARINE WAMO - Budget work is ongoing. Another piece of land has been added.
Costs will go down.
11. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
Approved
.
Diane Ward
From:
eent:
0:
Subject:
Pat Raddatz [Pat.Raddatz@co,washington.mn.us]
Thursday, January 02,200312:24 PM
Wally Abrahamson
Washington County Board Agenda - 1/7103
Washington County Board of Commissioners
14949 62nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Washington County, County Board Agenda
January 7, 2003 - 9:00 a,m.
1. 9:00 - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
2. Unfinished Business
3. Motion for Board to Adjourn Sine Die
4. Oath of Office Administered to the Following Elected County
Officials:
Dennis C. Hegberg, Commissioner District 1; Bill Pulkrabek,
Commissioner District 2; Nile L. Kriesel, Commissioner District 3; Myra
Peterson, Commissioner District 4; R.H. Stafford, Commissioner District
.; Doug Johnson, County Attorney; and James Frank, County Sheriff
5. New Roll Call
6. County Administrator - Nominations for Temporary Chair
7. Temporary Chair - Nominations for Chair of the County Board for
2003
8. Chair Elect - Nominations for Vice Chair of County Board for
2003
9. Set Board Meeting Dates for 2003
10. 9: 15 - Comments from the Public
Visitors may share their concerns with the County Board of
Commissioners on any issue that is on or not on the agenda. The Chair
will direct the County Administrator to prepare responses to your
concerns. You are encouraged not to be repetitious of previous speakers
and to limit your address to five minutes. The Chair reserves the right
to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant,
repetitive, irrelevant, or overly argumentative. The Chair may also
limit the number of individual presentations on any issue to accommodate
the scheduled agenda items.
.11. 9:25 - Consent Calendar
12. 9:25 - Assessment, Taxpayer Services and Elections - Kevin
Corbid, Director
1
-.
Set Public Hearing for Detachment and Annexation of Parcels Involving
School Districts 833 & 834
13. 9:30 - General Administration - Jim Schug, County Administrator
.
A. Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District - Dennis Larson,
President
B. Draft Agenda for the 2003 Legislative Session
14, 9:50 - Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the
full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest
and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not
intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any
action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future
board meeting.
15. Board Correspondence
16. 10:10 - Adjourn
17. 10:15 Washington County Regional Railroad Authority Convenes
A. Roll Call
B. Nominations for Election of Chair and Vice Chairof the RRA for
2003
.
C. RRA Minutes from November 19, 2002
D. RRA Workers' Compensation Coverage
E. Adjourn
18. 10:25 to 11: 10 - Board Workshop with Office of Administration
Complete Review of the Inventory of Mandates and County Core
Functions
19. 11:10 to 11:55 - Board Workshop with Office of Administration
Organizational Workshop
20. 12:00 to 12:45 - Board Workshop with Office of Administration
Strategies for 2003 Minnesota Legislative Session
************************************************************************************
Meeting Notices
January 7 - Interview Applicant for the HRA Board
8:30 a.m., Washington County Government Center
.
January 8 - Metro Transitways Development Board
8:30 a.m., 125 Charles Avenue - St. Paul
2
-, January 8 - Metropolitan 911 Board Executive Committee
9:30 a,m., 2099 University Avenue West - St Paul
January 8 - Metropolitan 911 Board
.0:30 a,m., 2099 University Avenue West - St Paul
January 8 - Central Corridor Coordinating Committee
3:30 p.m., 1919 University Avenue West - St Paul
January 9 - Metropolitan Counties Energy Task Force
9:00 a.m., 125 Charles Avenue - St Paul
January 9 - Legislative Delegation Reception
5:00 p.m., 526 Inwood Avenue North - Oakdale
************************************************************************************
Washington County Board of Commissioners
Consent Calendar - January 7, 2003
Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine
business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote,
Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for
discussion and/or separate action.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
Administration
A. Approval of the December 5 Truth-in-Taxation Hearing minutes and the
.ecember 17, 2002 Board Meeting minutes.
B. Approval of resolution awarding the 2003 newspaper publishing bids.
C Approval of a Memorial Day appropriation of $100 each upon request
in 2003 for the Stillwater Citizens' Memorial Day Association and
Washington County Posts and Barracks.
D. Approval of appointments and reappointments to the Advisory
Committees for 2003.
Community Services
E. Approval of resolution, Community Development Block Grant Subgrantee
Agreement with the City of Landfall and authorization to sign
agreement.
Human Resources, Employee Safety and Risk Management
F. Approval of a Special Project Emergency Services Specialist position
in the Department of Public Health and Environment from January 1
through December 31, 2003.
Sheriff
G. Approval of grant contract with the State of Minnesota, Department
Acf Public Safety, Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division, to provide
.supplemental funding for alcohol compliance checks for underage
drinking.
3
H. Approval to transfer ownership of Washington County Sheriff's
Office K-9 "Puzzle" to his handler, Sgt Ryan Meverden.
,
1. Approval of contract between the County of Dakota and Washington
County for boarding inmates at the Washington County Jail.
.
J. Approval of Change Order #4 to service agreement with Motorola for
radio service which will extend the agreement through 2003.
K. Approval to dispose of old jail mattresses by donating them to the
Salvation Army for use in their shelters.
Transportation & Physical Development
L. Approval of resolution! install a 90 minute parking only zone
located on CSAH 17 at 3537 Lake Elmo Avenue.
M. Approval of resolution! install a 20 miles per hour school speed
zone on CSAH 23.
N. Approval of resolution! establish a No Parking zone on west side of
CSAH 5.
Pat Raddatz! Administrative Assistant
Washington County
Phone: (651) 430-6014
e-mail: patraddatz@co.washington.mn.us
.
.
4
.'
.' "
Dear Mr. Kriesel-
My name is David Riehm. I am a 13 year old Star Scout llvm Ward 4, and I am writing
this letter to tell you what I think about the proposed measure to give the City of Stillwater
unlimited liquor licenses. What Famous Dave's is proposing, Mr. Kriesel, is not simply a measure
designed to give it a hard liquor license. This measure would cause significant changes in the way
restaurants are planned around here, and the consequences of this would be disastrous. The
increased availability of liquor would make it easy for underage drinkers to obtain alcohol, and
even the legal sale of liquor would hurt everyone but the vendors. Drunk driving and other forms
. of drug addiction would becOme rrtoreeonmiOil;alid Vlotence-W<>tildaJs(}go on tfieiiIJlii~ tliaDks
to the increase in drinking. of the major "starter drug", alcohol. The types of businesses and
institutions set up in this town would take a turn for the worse, and our reputation would follow.
In short, the measure would mean nothing good and everything bad for the city.
The limitation of liquor licenses was put into effect for a reason, an4 we have no better
one to dismantle it. Please, use all political influence at your disposal to disGourage voters to vote
for this measure. If that fails, enact a system to scrutinize requests for lice~s, or anything else
within your power, but please, don't let this just slip by.
Sincerely,tJ~ ~
a-.. .._--..
.
,;W,- ~i~^::