HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-24 CC Packet Workshop
..
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP
January 24, 1995
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
216 North Fourth Street
This meeting is a workshop session onlv. No action will be taken.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. 1995 Planning Department Work Program
2. Comprehensive Plan Update/Overview
. ADJOURNMENT
.
.
.
.
.,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
~
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: January 20, 1995
RE: WORKSHOP ON PLANNING RESPONSIBILITIES AND 1995 PLANNING
WORK PROGRAM
The attached report summaries the responsibilities of the community development department
and provides a 1995 work program for the department.
Most of the planning activity of the city is done through advisory committees or commissions.
The existing committees and commissions planning staff works with are listed along with
committee membership and meeting dates.
For the first part of 1995, the comprehensive plan update will take most staff special project time.
After the plan is adopted the focus of staff activity ;}Vill change to comprehensive plan
implementation and special area detailed planning. Two special projects that the department will
undertake in 1995 include McKusick Lake area parks and trailway planning, and North Hill
Historic Structure Study.
Economic development will continue with the development of the market place and downtown
hotel project.
The planning department also acts as the geographic infrastructure system, GIS, coordinator for
city departments and is developing a city-wide address and parcel map.
Attachment
.
.
.
.,
1995
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND WORK PROGRAM
Overview
The community development department is comprised of two professional planners, community
development director and city planner. In carrying out the work program the community
development department works primarily with the city council, planning commission and heritage
preservation commission. In addition to these bodies, other city committees and commissions are
provided planning staff assistance in carrying out their special responsibilities. Areas of
responsibility of the department are comprehensive planning, land use regulations (zoning
administration), historic preservation, economic development, public information and participation
and coordination. Each functional area is described as an element with goals, objectives and work
programs in the 1995 work program.
Besides the City Comprehensive Plan Policy, documents that provide general direction for the future
development, planning regulations provide specific direction for development projects. The
development regulations include the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, bluffland/shoreland
ordinance, downtown design guidelines, west Stillwater business park design guidelines.
The city has adopted a Tax Increment Assistance Policy to provide direction for the use of tax
increment financing consistent with the purposes and objectives of the city redevelopment plan.
The planning commission reviews subdivision of land, planned unit development, special use
permits, variances, street vacations, zoning ordinance amendments, annexation requests and
comprehensive plan amendments, building moving and permits. The planning commission receives
a staff report regarding each planning permit request including an analysis of the project as it relates
to site conditions, planning policy and regulations and other public utility impacts. For most cases
notice is sent out to owners of properties within 350 feet of the project.
For a typical planning project, the planning commission holds a public meeting, reviews the staff
report, receives a project presentation form the applicant, hears public comment, discusses the
project and takes action. The planning commission's charge is to review the project as it relates to
city planning regulations and policy and make final decision. The planning commission
recommends to the city council for final action zoning amendments, subdivisions and planned unit
developments. The city council receives the staff report and recommendation from the planning
commission, holds a public hearing in most cases and makes final decision regarding certain project.
The city council also acts as the appeals board for planning commission and staff actions. Planning
staff records any conditions of project approval and reviews building plans as available for
conformance with conditions of approval.
The planning commission is responsible for developing and maintaining the city comprehensive
plan. City comprehensive plan documents include the city-wide comprehensive plan (updated in
1995), Brick Pond Area Plan, 1987, Downtown Area Plan, 1988, West Stillwater Business Park
1
"
Plan, 1989, Brown's Creek and Middle River Watershed District Plans, 1992 and Lpwell Park
Renovation Plan 1992.
.
The heritage preservation commission reviews the design of projects in the downtown historic
commercial district and the Stillwater west business park. Design guidelines have been established
for those areas. The guidelines provide the basis for project review. The heritage preservation
commission makes recommendation regarding consistency of project design to the planning
commission and city council The HPC makes final decision regarding store signs in the downtown
if they meet the sign ordinance regulations.
The HPC also designates and maintains a list of locally significant historic sites. Once sites are
designated, they require HPC approval for building modifications.
The primary purpose of the heritage preservation commission is to ensure that new development is
consistent with the historic character of downtown and adopted design standards in the west
Stillwater business park.
The community development department provides staff assistance to the following committees and
commissions. Below, each committee, commission or special task force is listed along with its
membership/roster, a summary of department accomplishments during 1994 and work program for
1995.
Planning commission members: Gerald Fontaine,.Chairperson; Dorothy Gilbert Foster; Darwin
Wald; Glenna Bealka; Duane Elliot; Don Valsvik; Terry Zoller; Kirk Roetman; Robert Hamlin.
Meeting Date: Second Monday of each month.
.
Heritage preservation commission members: Kathy Francis; Robert Kimbrel; Howard Lieberman;
Jeff Johnson; Brent Peterson, Roger Tomten; Jay Michaels, Todd Remington.
Meeting Date: First Monday of each month.
Downtown parking commission members: Richard Chilson; Karl Ranum; Dave Swanson; Paul
Simonet; Patrick Andersen; Katie Holdorph; Ed Stuart.
Meeting Date: As scheduled.
Stillwater area economic development commission (SAEDC)
Steve Russell - City of Stillwater staff representative.
Meeting Date: As scheduled.
Brown's Creek Watershed Management Organization
Members: Ann Pung- Terwedo - City of Stillwater representative.
Meeting Date: Monthly meetings
2
.
.
.
.
Middle River Watershed Management Organization
Members: Ann Pung- Terwedo - City of Stillwater representative.
Meeting Date: Monthly meetings.
;.
3
1995 WORK PROGRAM
Comprehensive Plan:
Guide the use of land through the preparation of a City Comprehensive Plan consistent with local
development needs, community resources and good planning practices and principles.
Objectives:
1. Complete and maintain an up-to-date comprehensive plan.
2. Prepare more detailed plans as a part of the comprehensive plan for areas ofthe city or subject
areas as identified needing special attention and policy direction.
Work Program:
1. Complete the major city-wide comprehensive plan update (detailed work program attached).
2. Develop a city annexation growth policy/joint powers agreement as a part of the comprehensive
plan.
3. Assist in preparation of capital improvement program and coordinate with the comprehensive
plan.
~
4. Continue to implement the downtown plan and the west business park plan.
5. Implement the Brown's Creek and Middle River Watershed plans and administer wetland
conservation act regulations.
6. Assist in the development of plans and specifications for the levee wall reconstruction and lowell
park extension.
7. Assist in the development of open space polices for ravmes, public lands and other
environmentally sensitive areas.
8. Assist the park and recreation board in the development and redevelopment of neighborhood and
community parks.
9. Assist the park and recreation commission in the development of a McKusick pathway plan.
Land Use Regulations:
Administer land use regulations for benefit of overall community.
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
Objectives:
1. Develop and maintain zoning and subdivision ordinances.
Work Program:
1. Continue to administer zoning regulations.
2. Amend zoning ordinance as needed (text and map).
3. Major update of subdivision ordinance.
4. Review planning and planning related permits as required by the zoning ordinance (PUD's,
variances, subdivisions, street vacation).
5. Administer state environmental review requirement.
6. Review the design of new development in west Stillwater business park and downtown.
Historic Preservation:
Recognize and preserve Stillwater's historic resources.
Objectives:
~
1. Identify historic resources, building, sites and places.
2. Develop historic preservation policy and implement program.
3. Develop information to assist property owners recognize and rehabilitate historic and older
structures.
4. Educate the public of the importance of the cities historic resources.
5. Implement Work Program.
Work Program:
1. Provide staff assistance to the design review committee as required by the downtown design
review regulations and preservation ordinance.
2. Assist the city and various state agencies preserve the Stillwater/Houlton Interstate Bridge on
the National Register of Historic Places.
5
3. Review and comment on the levee wall project as it relates to its historic preservation and the
lo'well park plan.
4. Locally designate the territorial prison site and develop design guidelines to preserve its
significant historic, architectural and archeological resources.
5. Prepare the North Hill original town survey and evaluation report to identify historic properties
in Stillwater.
6. Prepare CLG grant for survey and evaluation of the South Hill original town.
7. Update walking tour of historic sites, structures and building in downtown.
8. Staff the design review committee in its review of development projects in the Stillwater west
business park.
9 . Work with private groups/individuals to assist in the preservation and restoration of downtown
Stillwater and the surrounding residential neighborhoods.
10. Coordinate city renovation efforts with preservation advocates, Rivertown Restoration and the
Washington County Historical Society.
11. Advocate and educate the community on the importance of the history of the City of Stillwater.
12. Continue to work with the State Historic Preservation Office on local historic preservation
matters.
13 . Work as liaison with other communities involved in historic preservation.
14. Develop a city demolition policy and regulations for historic buildings.
Economic Development:
Support economic development consistent with city needs:
Objectives:
1. Promote city economic development and provide assistant consistent with City Economic
Development Policy.
Work Program:
1. Assist in reviewing requests for economic development assistance and make recommendations
regarding the requests to the city council.
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
2. Represent the City on the Stillwater Area Economic Development Corporation (SAEDC) and
provide assistance as needed.
3. Monitor/assist in coordination of completion of Phase II Downtown Improvements (i.e.,
development ofUBC parking lots and levee wall/lowell park improvements).
5. Develop and administer a downtown building assistance/renovation program.
6. Maintain and update industrial/commercial vacant land survey.
Public Information and Participation:
Provide the opportunity for public participation in planning related issues and decisions.
Objectives:
1. Develop and distribute public information on city planning issues.
2. Provide maximum opportunity for public involvement in plan development review process and
implementation process.
Work Program:
1. Write public interest news articles on plannirtg issues and projects for the city newsletter,
newspaper and chamber publication.
2. Staff planning commission, design review committee, heritage preservation commission,
downtown parking commission, parks and recreation commission and other city committees and
task forces regarding planning activities.
3. Present current planning projects to community groups as needed/requested.
Coordination:
Cooperate with other city departments and other local, regional and state agencies on projects that
affect the city.
Objectives:
1. Provide planning staff assistance as needed for activities that are related to planning activities.
2. Effectively and clearly represent the city interests to other local, regional and state governments
and organizations.
Work Program:
7
1. Review metropolitan council policies and plans to see how they affect the city. Inform the
council of the effect and draft and present comments as directed.
2. Review county, regional, state and national documents that impact Stillwater planning and as
appropriate present to the city council for comment.
3. Work with other city departments in development of planning related projects.
;.
8
.
.
.
.
~
.
.
F
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
1994
Comprehensive Plan (50 meetings)
Prepared existing conditions report (all committees and commissions)
Prepared four alternative land use plans for planning area
. Assisted Ward Network in their planning efforts
. Worked with Stillwater/Stillwater Township Joint Task Force in developing guidepost document
and Alternative "E" and "F".
Attended and participated in Washington County Comprehensive Plan
Coordinate comp plan update with Met Council.
Regular Planning/Zoning Items
67 planning cases:
· 5 PUD
20 Special Use Permits
26 Variances
18 Subdivisions
. 3 Street Vacations
1 Zoning Map Amendment .
. 14 Design Review Permits (i.e., sign exteri()r facades, landscaping) downtown
. 3 Design review permits, business park
Miscellaneous
. Updated Park Dedication Policy
. Prepared and received grant for North Hill Intensive Site Survey
. Worked with Corps of Engineers and SEH on levee wall project
. Developed review process for administering the Wetland Conservation Act Rules
Implemented the Benson Park Plan
. Developed GIS System
Assist in promotion of 1 percent tax for park facilities
Economic Development
. Administer city tax increment financing policy
. Provide assistance to promote local industrial development
Review plans and represent city interests regarding TIF assistance for hotel project
Structure deal and represent cit interest in purchase ofUBC site and relocation to business park
.
~
.
.
J
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
v
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: January 20, 1995
RE: WORKSHOP ON STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
I would like to take this opportunity with the new council members coming on board to bring
you up to date on the comp plan update activity.
Since the comp plan update began in August 1993, much work has been done. Key planning
issues identified, extensive background information provided, alternative plans and impact
described, significant input from neighborhood meetings and the ward network process has been
provided. A listing of the planning commission meetings over the past year and a half and the
subject matter discussed is attached.
Besides the planning commission meetings, the council authorized a Joint Stillwater/Stillwater
Township Task Force with city council and planning commission representation and town board
and planning representation. The joint task force lfas meet fifteen times as listed.
.
The results of the meetings has been tangible and intangible. Better communication lines have
been open between the city and township regarding the comp plan and a report Guideposts for
Joint Planning and Alternative "E" and "F" have been developed by the task force. The
guidepost document and Alternative "E" and "F" are included in this report.
With all the information and input collected to date, the planning commission will develop and
recommend a plan to the city council at a workshop planning commission council meeting
March 27,1995 (tentative).
The council will review the plan recommendation and direct the commission to prepare the final
plan. The commission will prepare the final plan, hold a public hearing on the plan and
recommend a plan to the city council for approval. After holding a public hearing, the council
will adopt the plan or refer the plan to the Metropolitan Council for approval before final
adoption. Council action on the plan should be complete by June 1995 (update schedule
attached).
At meeting time, staff will go through the products and process of plan development to date and
key issues that remain before the council.
Attachments
.
~
.
.
"
RESULTS FROM S.TILLWATER/STILLWATER TO\VNSHIP
JOINT TASK FORCE MEETINGS
Guideposts for Joint Planning
The following policies and principles were discussed and considered by the joint task force as
planning guideposts for cooperation between the city and township.
The guideposts are the result of six-months of meetings and discussion and reflects a consensus
of direction, although neither the City of Stillwater nor Stillwater Township have officially
endorse the statements.
Overall Planning
Determine the desired growth rate and phasing of urban services to accommodate planned for
growth as needed for the urban-rural transition planning area (URTP A) for the 25-year planning
period 1995 - 2020.
NOTE: The urban-rural transition planning area (URTPA) is the area west of
Stillwater currently in Stillwater Township bordered by Dellwood Road (TH 96),
on the north, Manning Avenue (CR 15) on the west and Highway 36 on the south.
This area represents the ultimate future pl~ing area fo.r the City oJ Stillwater.
"
Skeleton Framework
New development will respect the environmental framework of the plan. This framework
includes wetlands, woodlands, windbreaks and sloped areas.
Natural drainage systems shall be used in new development areas to promote the recharge of
water tables and to reduce the speed and amount of run off.
Views from major public roads of new development in the URTPA shall be screened by existing
vegetation and land forms, new landscaping, wetlands and greenways. Major public roads
include Dellwood Road, Manning Avenue, McKusick Road, Boutwell Avenue and Highway 36.
Any new non-residential development shall be buffered from all adjacent residential uses,
connected by trails to residential areas and appear visually subdued in a landscaped setting as
viewed from public roads.
Design new subdivisions to minimize through traffic and when necessary design neighborhood
collector streets with greater setbacks, landscaping and pedestrian and bike trails.
Create new neighborhoods in city growth areas that retain elements of Stillwater's small town
1
Develop special design guidelines and performance standards using the planned unit
development process to implement visual screening, park, open space and trailway and natural
resource policies.
.
identity, appearance and character.
Available Areas for Development
There are approximately 500 acres of vacant land in the URTP A to be developed at either
township and city densities.
Preserve historic resources and unique land forms in growth area to maintain elements of the
areas past and provide and identity to new development.
Park, Recreation, Open Space Development
Develop an overall trail system for the URTP A areas that connects new residential development
areas to existing and proposed trials on McKusick Road, Myrtle Street and County Road 5 and
connects all residential areas in the URTP A from Dellwood Road to 62nd Street.
New residential development areas should include desirable design elements from existing city
neighborhoods including a mix of housing types, landscaped st,reets, acces~ible neighborhood
parks and open space areas and a unique neighbor!t6od images.
.
Require new development to provide 10 percent of the development residential land area or its
equivalent for neighborhood (7 percent) and community parks (3 percent).
Cityffownship Land Use
Try to locate within the planning area an elementary school site, 10 acres, and community park,
25 acres. (Good planning in either case.)
Require a detailed environmental assessment of physical site conditions including plant and
animal communities, topography, soil, drainage and wetlands before land development planning
begins.
Density
Use new development concepts, where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster
housing, to provide life cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for and use of the
automobile and maintain open space.
Use ghost platting and cluster development to allow some initial growth with the opportunity for
2
.
.
.
.
urban density development in the future when desired and planned.
Establish lot size and other development standards for the URTPA areas in the township that
accommodate future urban development according to the Stillwater comprehensive plan.
If new residential development areas are developed at city densities, design elements from
existing city neighborhoods including a mix of housing types landscaped streets, accessible
neighborhood parks and open space areas and unique neighborhood images.
Coordination and Implementation Structure
Establish Joint Planning Board to coordinate planning between the City of Stillwater and
Stillwater Township so both city and township plans for the URTP A are consistent.
Use orderly annexation agreements, joint power agreements and municipal urban service area
extension agreements to coordinate and implement comprehensive plan growth phasing policy.
Elements of these agreements may include:
Defining a rural taxing district so existing residents will be protected from unreasonable
taxes.
No adverse economic affects to existing to\ynship resid~nts by MUSA extension into the
UR TP A for urban development. ·
Establish 5-year planning periods for overall growth phasing.
Any implementation of Comp Plan for the URTP A shall have input from the township
and city.
Key Planning Concepts for URTP A
The following key planning concepts provide direction for the preparation of the comprehensive
plan. The concepts will be a part of the comprehensive plan for the city and township and shall
be used to guide special area planning.
Greemyays/Open Space Definition
Greemvays shall be established along Manning Ave, Dellwood Blvd, Myrtle Street, McKusick
Road and Boutwell Drive. The greenways shall be 100 - 200 feet in width depending on the
location and site conditions. The purpose of the greenway is primarily to preserve the natural
semi-rural character of the transition area by screening new development from major public
roads. The greenway shall appear informal and natural using native indigenous plant material
adapted to existing topographic conditions. Enhancement of existing topographic or vegetative
3
conditions. is encouraged to the extent the enhancement appears natural. Wetland mitigation sites
may be used as part of the greenway. Pathways may be located along side or in the greenway but
not appear as a primary design element of the greenway. The green way will provide a landscape
separation between newly developing residential areas and high volume traffic corridors.
.
Trailways, Parks and Open Space Areas
Trailways, neighborhood and community park and open space areas will be provided throughout
the URTPA. The extensive Brown's Creek Wetland systems shall provide the framework for
park and open space resources preservation in the north portion of the transition area. Long Lake
and existing woodlands and windbreaks shall be used in the southern portion of the site for trail
locations. An overall system of trails connecting new neighborhoods from Dellwood Blvd to
62nd Streets shall be planned along wetlands, new natural drainage ways and wooded areas.
Within neighborhoods pathways shall conveniently connect residents to neighborhood park and
open space areas separated from auto traffic. Any active community park, convenience
commercial use or school site shall be clearly connected to surrounding residential areas by
walkways and bike path, utilize and preserve natural areas for trail locations.
Development Pattern and Density
The overall character of the transition areas shall be single family with selected locations of
compact clustered attached housing. The existing semi~rural character of the areas north of
McKusick Road (Random Creek) and south of Bothwell (Spri~g Creek) shall remain with some
in fill at rural densities.
.
Newly developed areas shall be large lot ( 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acres DU/Acre), small lot
(2 to 3 DU/Acre) or higher density attached housing at 4 - 6 DU/Acre.
Large. lot single family areas are located in areas of sensitive sites. Because of topography
wetlands, lakes or timberland conditions the amount of site disruption is limited. These areas
tend to be located on steeply sloped or wooded shorelands or adjacent to sensitive wetlands or
open space areas. A cluster development concept could work in this area to minimize the impact
on the land.
Small. lot single family areas tend to be in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. These
sites can be interior to the large lot area or setback form open space areas. These sites are the
flatter corn or hay fields of the URTPA. The development density of the small lot area is typical
of the existing city.
Attached or compact housing areas are located in pockets separated visually and physically from
single family areas. These locations have good direct access to major roads and are more closely
tied to existing urbanized areas. Sites for compact housing area located on County Road 5, 62nd
near 15, Myrtle Street south and west of Long Lake, possibly McKusick Road (west of
4
.
.
~
.
.
mitigation site) and pockets south of Dellwoo.d Blvd.
Convenience Commercial Locations. The purpose of this use is to provide services and products
for the surrounding residential areas to reduce auto use. The sites should be clearly connected
by pathways to adjacent residential areas, be of a residential scale and style compatible with the
adjacent residential areas.
Office park or research and development areas. These locations provide a job base for the
surrounding residential areas and tax base for the community. These sites should have
convenient access to major roads, be visually and physically separated from residential areas, be
attractively designed and landscaped to fit into the site conditions.
The plan will respect current uses as they relate to assessment policy and any required land use
changes.
~
-
5
Land Use
Residential
Single Family
Large Lot
Small Lot
Compact
Totals
ALTERNATIVE ."F"
Acres
(1.0 - 1.5 DU/Acre)
(2.0 - 3.0 DU/Acre)
(4.0 - 6.0 DU/Acre)
98
265
125
488
,
.
C:\WPWIN60\ WPDOCS\RESUL TS.SR
6
.
DU
100-150
530-795
500-750
1,130-1,695
.
.
.
.
.
.J
"
"
c...,::-,. _ '~
'I' -~ .')-"!"~
':( ': ~
,
\ r-....'
~
LEGEND
~ WETLANDS/DRAINAGE WAYS
~ BUFFER
~ WOODLANDS
W OPEN SPACE
o SINGLE-FA1\lILY
C!!!:J TOWNIIOl\lES
~ RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
.......... TRAIL
ALTEUNATIVE "r"
Land Use
Rc~iJl:llli:l1
Sini:le Family
L.arge lot (1.0. IS OUi^crc)
SmaUlQl (2.0. j 0 OIl/Acre)
Compact (4.0.6.0 DV/Acrc)
"iOla!s
ALTERNATIVE E / 400 TOTAL D.U.'S*
* within designated areas
t.ill> llli
93 100.110
26; ~30.795
m ;00.710
483 I,DO-1,69S
.
.
I.
DATE
1- 4- 95
12-14-94
10-26-94
10-19-94
10-12-94
9-28-94
9-14-94
8-24-94
7-20-94
7-6-94
6-15-94
JOINT CITY OF STILLWATER/STILLWATER TOWNSHIP
JOINT TASK FORCE MEETINGS'
MARCH 1994 - JANUARY 1995
SUBJECT
Review guidepost document and plan ELF
alternati ves .
Review guidepost document and plan ELF
al ternati ves
Review Alternatives E & F
Review Natural and OS Area
Review development patterns
Development of Alternative X
Review goals and policies
Take visual preference survey
Natural Resource Presentation - Mike Gain
;. Review areas of agree'ment and
disagreement
Discuss cluster concept and urban densities
Update on township meetings
Update on ward network meetings
Consideration of cooperative planning,
orderly annexation/cost sharing
Review township ideas for planning areas
Discuss orderly annexation
Review and compare existing Township
planning goals and policies with proposed
City goals and policies
Review development trends since 1984
Discuss Washington County Compo Plan
and relationship to Stillwater Planning
Review Alternative Plans
Discuss opportunities for cooperation
6-29-94
5-11-94
4-27-94
3-24-94
Present results from June 14, 18,. and 22
Compo Plan neighborhood meetings
Receive Township Annexation Study results
Review results from May 2 and 9 Planning
Commission meetings
Review areas of potential development in
planning area
Receive presentation on orderly annexation
possibilities
Receive Met Council presentation on
population projection procedures and
interpretation
Review methods of allowing development
and preserving character greenways, parks,
natural resource pollution policy, compact
development specific plans and design
guidelines
Joint Stillwater City/Stillwater Township
Task Force formed
.
.
.
.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
MEETINGS AS OF JANUARY 1995*
MEETING
SUBJECT
_ DATE
. ugust 11,1993
City Council
work program and budget approval
September 20, 1993
Planning Commission
work program
October 18, 1993
Planning Commission
existing conditions
November 29, 1993
Planning Commission
Questionnaire results/ goals policies
December 20, 1993
Planning Commission
Growth trends/land use/ natural
resources
January 31, 1994
Public Hearing
Phase I Existing conditions/goals and
objectives
February 9, 1994
Planning Commission
Alternative Plan Development
March 7, 1994
Council/Commission Workshop
Phase I results/public facilities
March 21, 1994
eY2,1994
Planning Commission
Phase II/Existing city
~
Greenways/Trails Update Township
Task Force
Planning Commission
May 3, 1994
City Council Phase II Alternatives
May 9, 1994
Planning Commission Alternative plan/neighborhood
meeting schedule
June 6, 1994
Planning Commission Public Meeting Phase II Alternative Plans
June 14, 1994
Planning Commission Alternative Plan Workshop
June 18, 1994
Planning Commission Alternative Plan Workshop
June 22, 1994
Planning Commission Alternative Plan Workshop
July 11, 1994
Planning Commission Discuss input from neighborhood
meetings and alternative plan
July 18, 1994
Planning /Council Workshop Alternative Plan selection
_lilY 27, 1994
August 1, 1994
Planning Commission/Council Discuss alternative plans and public
input
Planning /Council Workshop Alternative Plan selection
August 16, 1994
Planning Commission Recommendation
to Council on Comp Plan Alternatives Alternative plans
September' 6, 1994
Council direction on Comp Plan
Alternatives
Alternative plans
.
September 26, 1994
Planning Commission public hearing
review and recommendation on Comp
Plan
Comp plan
October 10, 1994
Planning Commission
Comp plan update
October 11, 1994
City Council public hearing review
and adoption of comp plan
Comp plan
October 14, 1994
Planning Commission
Comp plan update
November 30,1994
Planning Commission
Receive ward network presentation
December 12, 1994
Planning Commission
Discuss and review ward network
report and receive DR TP A
presentation.
January 23, 1995 Planning Commission Response to ward network and joint
~' task force report
'Besides Planning Commission and Council meetings, the Parks and Recreation Commission has met 5 times.
to discuss the parks element of the Comp Plan. The Heritage Preservation Commission has met 6 times and the
Stillwater Township Task Force has met 4 times.
.
.
"
.
.
.
SCHEDULE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Phase I
August 1993 - January 1994
Phase II
February 1993 - November 1994
February - March 1995
Phase III
March - April 1995
May 1995
June 1995
Actions
Completed
, (X)
Identification of key planning issues, and collection
and analysis of information regarding traffic, housing,
land use, parks, public facilities and open space. [X]
Preparation of goal and actions to guide future
growth and development of community. [K]
Preparation of plan alternatives and presentation
of alternatives to community for comment. W
Ward network input regarding planning issues
and plan alternatives. W
Stillwater city/township joint task force input on
alternative pl~s. [X]
.
Planning commission recommend plan alternative
to city council. D
City council review planning commission
recommendation and direct preparation of new
comprehensive plan. D
Planning commission and city council hold
public hearings and adopt new comprehensive
plan. * D
City submit new comprehensive plan to
metropolitan council for approval. D
*When specific dates for planning commission and city council public hearings are set, notices
will be published in the local newspapers and mailed to the comprehensive plan mailing list.
At111J
.
e
,v15
J'~ tf If
.
STILLWATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Del19P
^llt"rnnl.lvo vrv",luplftCnl.
nod lolIl1d VI. 5c)u~fttC'. for
^nnexGl Ion ^Ct"Ofl
Phn Doveloptnenl
Plan [""pl.mental Ion
OGlIe Ha
Exht 109 CondHla".
Rt"rort
Envlrotllftanlal
Res(!'urch Rnd
Ana tya hi
Circulation
fllIu_ ldentlf 1 C01 t10n
and Goal >>.UJUlj)
^It.ornathe oovelopmunl
"nd \..nnd v.. Sch.~. lor
Exllltlng Cil\'
Revhw camp Piau
l'oUchl
Lnnd VIO
lIoueln9
Phnnlnq COfJffth.ton
It'" 1.'" of ExilUnq
COnd 1t lonl
Econoalc
comnun1ty Facility
p.rk.
IIblor.1c pt...natlon
Safetr
Ann.xatlon ^r..'
Awt4
J'4f\ i If
~ I
REVIEW U^CKGROUNll ,.." ","""""olr----
I'UlILIC HEETING REVIEW DEVF.LOI'HENT
IlEGIIl PROJECT fOR DISCUfifi ~X[STING EXISTING CONllITIONS - ^NlJ PlIBLIC m:ETING 1 HI'I.~;HF.NT^T lOtI
CONllITIONS REPORT MIlJ IJlNll '-- PLAN llEVELOPMENT - PLAN I\OOPTION -~
PLAN GO^L SETTING L/lHll USE SCIIEHES
I
RF.VIF.1oI
RESf:I\RCII /\NO
/\N^L'lSIS
PLANNING COMMISSION
ROLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
.'
/'
JI4lttJ11J
!.
~
.
.
,
~
~ilJwte~
'" ;;, "' , " '" " .""" ~')
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
ON
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING ROOM
The Stillwater Planning Commission will hold a special meeting on Monday, January 23,1995,
at 7 p.m. in the Fire Department Training Room.
AGENDA
1. Review of response to ward network report.
2.
Review of Joint Stillwater/Stillwater Township guidepost report and Stillwater township
position resolution. ~
3.
Information from URTP A property owners/developers regarding development plans and
fit with guidepost policy document.
4. Update comp plan schedule.
5. Other business.
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
~
DA: January 20, 1995
RE: AGENDA ITEMS FOR JANUARY 23, 1995
You have four items on your agenda as listed. The response to the ward network report is based
on the work done by the commission and staff to date with some comments on existing plans and
regulations. Commissions should review the response before finalizing it for presentation to
ward network representatives.
The second item is the product of the work of the joint Stillwater City/Stillwater Township
Planning Task Force. Jerry, Don and Kirk represented the commission on that task force. Dave
Johnson, from the town board, will be at the meeting to present their position.
The DR TP A property owners, as a follow up to their earlier December 12, .1994 presentation to
.
the commission, have put together their plan concepts and discussed the fit of their plans with the
guideposts for joint planning statement. This is presented FYI.
The final item on the agenda, is a revised schedule for completing the comp plan update. March
27, 1995, is set for a workshop with the city council to present the recommended plan and June
1995 is set for plan adoption with the substantial work done by the commission to date, this
schedule should be met.
.
RESPONSE TO WARD NETWORK REPORT
~
~
.
.
CITY OF STILL WATER PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 1995
Ward Network Report Rt;sponse
The following report responds to the comments, questions, suggestions and recommendations
contained in the ward network report of November 15, 1994. The response is based on the work
of the planning commission and city of Stillwater staff to date and the addition work items and
information that will be prepared as comprehensive plan development and adoption proceeds.
The ward network report identifies four key issue areas. The network key issue areas are four of
ten key issue areas identified earlier by the planning commission in their previous work.
This response is organized by issue area as they appeared in the ward network report. The ward
network report statement is followed by a resource or comment. The response is in italics.
The purpose of the response is to add to the discussion of key issues facing the city, to provide
additional background information relative to each issue and to recognize the effort of the ward
network and individual participation in developing the ward network report.
Continued ward participation is expected and welcome through the remainder of the
comprehensive plan adoption and implementation process.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMENT
. Desire to follow through (implementation) of adopted Comprehensive Plan.
. Concern for addressing current city's issues as top priority.
Specific Recommendation
Preservation of small town character
1. Downtown Business Area:
. Enhance downtown as a center/identity. Return downtown into a full service commercial
area rather than just a tourist area allowing residents to shop locally and support the small
business concept. Encourage businesses such as grocery and hardware store, keep city
hall downtown and provide adequate parking for residents.
. Keep downtown historically correct. Determine what types of development will be
allowed in the downtown area. Develop and utilize specific criteria for maintaining
historic nature and small town character.
. Plan should ensure economic well being of downtown Stillwater by creating incentives
for small businesses and limiting similar cotnmercial development in township area.
Comment: In 1988 after two years of meetings with downtown property and business owners
and city residents a downtown plan was adopted. The plan is available for review at the city
public library and city hall. The plan includes sections on land use, traffic, circulation and
parking, utilities and streets, pedestrian circulation and urban design.
The plan identifies uses that would help balance the downtown. Employment opportunities and
housing uses are emphasized. Market conditions, lack of convenience, and other location
options make it difficult to retain community commercial business in the downtown.
Downtown Stillwater is within a National Register of Historic Preservation District requiring
design review by the city Heritage Preservation Commissionfor exterior modification to
buildings. Special design guidelines are in the downtown plan. Since its reformation in 1989,
the HPC has reviewed over 60 applications for exterior building modifications in the downtown.
The city of Stillwater does not currently have an incentive program for small downtonw business.
The city has concentrated on creating an attractive downtown public physical environment with
riverfi'ont parks and public facilities such as parking to encourage private economic investment,
Since the downtown plan adoption in 1988 over 200 parking spaces have been added to the
2
dmvntown parking supply. with an additional 100 - 150 scheduled for construction next year at
the USC site. The city council has also appointed the downtown parking commission with
dmvntown business and city resident representation to over see the use of parking spaces in the
downtown.
.
As a part of the downtown plan implementation, a Lowell Park Plan has been prepared and
adopted. The plan has led to obtaining $2.8 millionfederal and state funds for the levee wall
reconstruction and improvement to Lowell Park. An additional $2.1 million is needed to
construct a 50-year flood wall between the parking lot and park. Additionalfunds will be
needed to reconstruct and extend Lowell Park to Mulberry Point.
2. Residential Areas:
. Top priority ofthe comprehensive plan should be maintaining/improving the
conditions/quality of life in existing residential areas. Specific actions to be included in
the plan include:
A requirement to develop detailed criteria and methods to preserve and/or restore
older and historic structures (older districts, older buildings, specific sites such as the
old prison).
Preservation of open spaces such as the athletic field/ravines/etc.
.. .
.
Reduction in residential traffic. Traffic in residential areas has negative impact on
small town character and feel. Restrict traffic in core areas to reduce noise pollution.
.
Concentrate on areas of the city that require improvement. Create incentives to
restore neighborhoods that are in poor condition.
Comment:
The historic preservation ordinance has a process to designate structures and sites historic
landmarks, This process provides a level of protection to historic sites. The city's heritage
preservation commission oversees those regulations.
The city council has placed a moratorium on development in all ravines until the
comprehensive plan is adopted. The comprehensive plan will address ravines and other
open space areas. The athletic field is owned by the school district, They have no plans to
change the use of the field. If they do want to sell the land the City of Stillwater has
indicated an interest in purchasing it.
Trqffic is a major concern in some residential areas including Third/Fourth Street,
Greeley/Owens corridor, Pine/Olive corridor, Myrtle Street and Deerpath. Many of these
3
.
.
.
.
streets are county roads and under the jurisdiction of the county. The city will continue to
work with MnDOT/Washington County and local residents to address existing traffic
problems, The city council has commissioned the traffic engineer to prepare a study of the
Deerpath traffic situation and make recommendations for improvements. This specific area
traffic study approach is included in the action section fo the draft comprehensive plan
policy.
Through the city street and sidewalk maintenance program, the physical condition of streets
and sidewalks throughout the city are being improved and maintained.
Additional study of housing conditions is needed to determine if a housing rehabilitation
program is needed to preserve housing quality for low and moderate income people and to
retain neighborhood character.
The city is currently conducting a North Hill Historic Building Survey to evaluate the
significance of structures in the area. This could lead to the nomination of a National Historic
District or local Historic District Designation as individual landmark designations.
3. Impact of Proposed Growth on Small Town Character.
. There is considerable concern regarding the significant negative impact on the small town
charm and historic character of Stillwater i~ major urbaJ1 growth occurs in the expansion
area. Stillwater citizens, as well as visitors;have long recognized and enjoyed the
historic nature of this town and the surrounding rural atmosphere that has been
Stillwater's identity.
. A concerted effort must be made to preserve the maximum amount of virgin/rural land
and control typical urban sprawl (and subsequent population growth) which would not be
appropriate for the birthplace of Minnesota.
. Similar to how towns on the east coast are recognized the importance of preserving the
unique character and not allowing for "typical" suburban sprawl, Stillwater has the
opportunity to make a monument decision that will impact numerous generations to
come.
Comment: Concern for growth and its impact on small town charm and historic character is a
key issue for the comprehensive plan. The City of Stillwater will grow in the future. How it
grows and the quality of growth will affect the appearance and quality of the area. A range of
growth alternatives are currently being considered. The planning commission will recommend a
plan alternative to the city council. Public hearings will be held on the selected plan.
4. Adherence to Comprehensive Plan
4
. Have this plan supporte~ by enforced zoning, ordinances and other appropriate measures
(such as ordinances to protect and preserve downtown historical character).
.
Comment: The city enforces the zoning ordinance and other development regulations on a
regular basis. If there are specific issues or cases where enforcement is needed the planning
department can be contacted.
ISSUE AND GROWTH DEVELOPMENT
Growth Trends, Annexation
. Should We? How Much? How Fast?
. What is the appropriate level of growth that will address the complex issues faced by this
unique community
. Avoiding typical "suburban growth" was repeatedly referenced by the citizens due to the
impact on key issues described in this report - preserving small town character, traffic and
congestion impact, preserving open space/rural character.
. Has the city explored what other historic communities (example: east coast towns) have
done to control growth to preserve the small town character?
.
.
Comment: Growth and annexation is a key issue facing the city. Growth is related to the region
and county and all elements of the comprehensive plan, land use, housing, transportation, public
facilities, national resources and park, recreation and open space areas and is a complicated
issue.
Six alternative land use plans that include different development patterns and represent various
growth rates have been developed and reviewed by the planning commission and community
groups,
The planning commission will present a recommended alternative to the council based on the
desired growth rate, development pattern and quality of life that will result from the
development.
The planning commission has reviewed contemporary planning concepts and design and
planning principles while developing the comprehensive plan. Three books that contained
concepts of particular interest and reference are Visions for a New American Dream.
Greenwavs. A Guide to Planninz Design and Develooment and Rural bv Design. The
commission has received presentation on compact housing and the benefits of planning for
phased developed in urban areas with city services. Staff is aware of the cluster development
concept. transfer of development rights and purchase of development rights concepts being
5
.
.
.
.
considered by Washington County in updating their comprehensive plan.
Cluster Housing/Rural Development.
. Citizens expressed common desire to limit the population growth as documented in the
survey conducted by the city in the fall of 1993 and in the ward network process.
However, there were some advocating the continuation of the current rural development
and others who would like to see a cluster housing approach utilized for the purpose of
preserving maximum open space and maintaining the small town character. In either
case, using a growth forecast equivalent to the current township projection was expressed
by numerous citizens.
Comment: The rural/cluster concept is being considered by Washington County for unsewered
areas. The Stillwater Township/City Joint Task Force also considered the rural/cluster concept
and included it as Alternative "E", Under this alternative, development in the township would be
cluster at township densities under township jurisdiction. The economic feasibility of extending
sewer and water services to these rural clusters will be considered to see if it is economically
feasible for rural/clusters to be under city jurisdiction. Marine on the St. Croix a town without
city services is considering a rural/cluster ordinance.
Cost Impact
. Is the plan based on realistic assessment of costs versus the returns created by growth (is
impact on costs of services considered adequately). Have the various risks or "what if
scenarios" of the growth assumptions been evaluated (such as if industrial/commercial
development does not materialize adequately is it still financially sound)? An overall
analysis/assessment of costs, risks, benefits, impact on current town, etc. should be
completed and presented with the alternatives.
Comment: A fiscal impact analysis was a part of reviewing the first four alternative land use
plans A -D. The analysis shows the range of revenues and costs associated with various
alternatives, Additional fiscal impact information will be provided for the new Alternatives "E"
and "F".
Impact on the Current Community
. Careful long-term analysis of possible annexed areas to ensure current infrastructure does not
suffer to cater to new areas. With the various growth alternatives, what are the different
impacts on needs for schools, services, roadways, crime?
Comment: The impact of the various alternatives are being considered in terms of public
facilities and services including utilities, roads, school age population and city staff needs
including fire and police services. These impact areas were consideredfor the June 6th
6
alternatives and will be reco1J.sidered for the recommended alternative,
Design Guidelines
.
. Various overall "design guidelines" impacting potential growth areas were expressed
throughout the process. These include requirements for:
1. Stronger sense of neighborhood "center" or core
2. Fit with historic character of the town
3. Preserve the open space within growth neighborhood locations (does the plan include
a green belt or buffer zone around Stillwater and encourage compact growth rather
than sprawl?)
4. Preservation/impact on wildlife
5. Landmarks
6. Narrow streets
7. Ravines as borders
8. Limit on convenience stores in township area
9. Encourage/incentive utilization of existing spaces and structures wherever possible
rather than developing new commercial areas
10. Range of housing mix and income type
11. Light industry
. Other design criteria was collected during tne process through a slide show conducted
during the September meetings. A survey was completed by each participant that rated
preferences regarding various design alternatives. The results of that analysis are
presented on Attachment 1.
.
Comment: The eleven areas listed above are considered in various sections of the
comprehensive plan. Some of the items light industry, housing mix, open space preservation
relate to land uses other item relate to parks or natural resources preservation policies and still
others are development projects design review criteria, i.e" narrow streets, neighborhood center,
historic character and landmarks. The items listed above will be considered and appear in
sections of the comprehensive plan as appropriate,
Adherence to Comprehensive Plan
. Suggestions were made to develop a process by which the plan is referred to on an
ongoing basis before any development/changes are implemented? When a petition for
annexation or development is proposed, certain factors/key criteria must be examined
each time for approval consideration - e.g., impact on traffic, financial impact.
Comment: The comprehensive plan is the city land use policy document that provide direction
for the future growth and development of the city. In developing the comprehensive plan fiscal
7
.
.
.
.
and transportation impacts are considered and provide information that is used in making a
decision on the final plan. Once the comprehensive plan is adopted providing direction for
future development and growth, new development can be checked against the anticipated
impacts of the plan.
The comprehensive plan is reviewed and updated periodically, At that time based on changed
conditions, fiscal and transportation impacts can be checked and reconsidered.
Preservation of Open Space and Natural Resources
Preservation of Open Space
Open space decisions must be made before any other development occurs.
Comment: The land use plan and resource preservation policies of the comprehensive plan
provide direction for preservation of open space. Comprehensive plan adoption provides
direction and takes place before developmen~ occurs.
Does the plan include specific guidelines to protect the city's current open space from
development (both sides of the river, ravines, around lakes, ponds and wetlands) through the
use of conservation zones or other means?
Comment: The draft comprehensive plan includes policies tha~ provide di~ection for
preservation and protection of open space resourcts. Wetlands are protected by the shore land
ordinance and bluffland/shoreland ordinance along the Sf. Croix River. The city owns Kolliner
Park and the Aiple properties. Kolliner Park is in open space use as required by deed retriction.
The Aiple property is leased. The lease will run out in 1998 and the land will be available to the
city. The adopted downtown plan calls for these two areas to be part of the city riverway parks
and open space system and a detailed plan to be prepared to the Aiple property closer to the end
of the levee(1997),
Does the plan address open space along Highway 36 to prohibit congested commercial areas
that destroy the rural flavor?
Comment: Four of the six alternative plans call for research and office development along
Highway 36 between County Road 5 and County Road 15. The ravines and natural tree cover
would be used to screen development from 36. Two alternatives, D & E, do not call for city
annexation of the area. Based on township zoning, large lot 2-1/2 acre density development
would occur in the area. Alternative E calls for the clustering of the 2-1/2 acre development.
Does the plan hide homes better in the township?
Comment: Alternatives A, Band F call for a green belt along County Road 15. Alternatives E
and F callfor screening and buffering of residential areas along major roads, i.e., TH 96,
8
McKusick Rad, CR 12 and CR.15. The plans call for natural features such as hills, wooded
areas and ponds to be used and enhanced through planting and site development design to
conceal development from major public roads.
.
Does the plan have strict signage ordinances for business near open space so character of area
is preserved?
Comment: The comprehensive plan will include open space preservation policy. The existing
city sign ordinance regulates signage and does not allow signage in open space areas only
commercial areas.
Does the plan include a,plan for having open spaces as opposed to a town of high density
housing?
Comment: Alternative plans A, Band F show areas with a range of housing densities and open
space areas, Alternative D and E show development in the planning area outside the city at
township density and under township jurisdiction.
Does the plan include guidelines for preserving existing rural/agricultural features?
Comment: The plan alternatives include policies that provide for the preservation of rural
qualities in the transaction area, The plan alternatives does no.t provide fv.r the retention of
agricultural land uses. Other areas of the county, fncluding portions of May Township and
Denmark Township, are designatedfor agricultural preservation in the Washington County
Comprehensive Plan.
.
Does the plan include public trails and sidewalks throughout the community?
Comment: Yes, All alternative plans provide for sidewalks in existing and new development
areas, An extensive trailway system is proposed for new development areas connection to
existing city and county trials and linking new neighborhoods to each other.
Does the plan include a variety of open spaces; linear greenways, neighborhood parks,
playground parks and community parks?
Comment: Yes. All open space types mentioned above are included in the alterative plans,
Does the plan include connections among green spaces?
Comment: Yes, Existing and new greenway and trailways are connected to county and city
trails, The plan calls for study of existing city ravines to see if trailways should be located in
ravines. The city council has recently considered a special study of city ravines.
9
.
.
po
.
'.
Does the plan include security for the open spaces, natural surveillance by residents?
Comment: The plan alternatives do not provide a management program for new open space
areas. Typically the regular city departments parks, police, fire are responsible for protection of
the city lands,
Does the plan identify a balance between active and passive uses and how much of both
companies to the "feel" in the area presently?
Comment: The parks and recreation commission has considered the various type of parks and
open space facilities needed by the community, They appear in the parks element of the plan.
Will there be protection for the oak savannah on the west side of Long Lake?
Comment: Existing city regulations will preserve and protect wooded areas. The city has
adopted aforest protection ordinance that help minimize the impact of development on trees and
wooded areas.
Implementation and Enforcement
Does the plan define what open space is?
Comment: The plan gives examples of open space as mentioned above,
~
Does the plan require reduced pollution of those areas being considered, i.e., reduction of
fertilized lawns around open space?
Comment: No. The plan does not propose specific management policies of open space areas. If
an open space area needs special protection because of its unique qualities, it will be considered
when the open space is secured by the city.
Does the plan guarantee the space will remain open? If so, how?
Comment: The plan designates areas of open space. If they are privately owned city regulation
directs future use, If the open spaces are owned by the city, the city council and existing
ordinances and restrictions regulate there uses.
Does the plan provide ordinances, etc., to preserve open spaces agreed upon between city and
township:-
Comment: Once the comprehensive plan is adopted ordinances as needed can be adopted to
preserve open space areas.
Means of Acquisition
10
Does the plan support the purchase of development rights so some land can remain rural in
use?
.
Comment: The purchase of development rights is not a part of the city comprehensive plan.
Washington County is considering that method to preserve rural quality in the county.
Does the plan advocate the zoning of open space. .. without compensating the private property
owners?
Comment: Some open areas can be regulated because of hazardous conditions or public
purpose as established by the state, The city can not zone areas open space if reasonable
economic use of the land is not provided. A good example of this would be the woodland on the
west side of Long Lake. The woodland would be protected by the forest preservation ordinance
but some economic use (development) of the area would be allowed.
Will the open space be purchased by the city?
Comment: Open space areas could be purchased as parks with in lieu park fees or required for
dedication. An area open space committee is inventorying open space resources and may result
in an open space bond ballot measure to raise money for open space purchase.
Does the plan address the potential of closing l?w-use road~ to crate PCllk or open space in
existing neighborhoods? ·
.
Comment: The park and recreation commission has discussed closing a street through Staples
Field to expand the park and make it more useable. Other areas could be considered in specific
area or neighborhood plans.
Does the plan include limiting the size of the lot one can build on to preserve the open space?
Comment: A range of residential densities are proposed in the plan alternatives. Alternatives D
and E, have rural density (2.5 acres) while A, B, C and F have a range of urban densities,
Alternative E a cluster alternative would result in the most open space presentation. The over
all density of Alternative E is 1 dwelling unit /2. 5 acres for new development.
Amounts of Open Space Provided
Does the plan include a completed "build-out" indicating when no further infill would be
allowed?
Comment: The plan shows the city planning areas to 2020, Depending on developed rate, the
entire planning areas will be "built-out" by that date, There are no plan to go west of County
Road 15 or north of Highway 96. In fact, greenbelts are proposed as boundaries between urban
and rural areas in plan alternatives A, B, and F..
11
.
.
~
.
.
Does the plan include requirements for the specific amount of land to be left as open space in
the growth areas?
Comment: ,The plan calls for the preservation of wetlands and a 10 percent of developable land
area for park purposes, Other environmentally constrained lands such as steeply sloped areas
are protected through existing natural resource protection ordinances.
Does the plan include leaving and protecting ecologically viable corridor within the planning
area extending from McKusick Lake to and including the oak forest on the west side of Long
Lake?
Comment: The city owns or controls most of the land around McKusick Lake. The intent of the
plan is to keep it in its current natural condition with the addition of trials and possibly a
ecology lab. The comprehensive plan trail element calls for trials along Long Lake connecting
to 62nd and County Road 12. The parks and recreation commission will prepare a master plan
for the McKusick Lake area in 1995,
Does the plan include provisions indicating the frequency of neighborhood parks? (a five
minute walk maximum)
Comment: Yes. The plan has a neighborhood parks element. Additional neighborhood parks
needs have been identified for the South Hill and Oak Glen areas. .
Does the plan retain enough open space to maintain a sense of "openness"?
Comment: The plan calls for wetlands, sloped areas, greenway buffers and park areas to remain
open. This will provide a certain sense of openness within an urban context.
Traffic and Congestion
Recognition/Priority of Current Traffic Problem.
. Since the survey conducted by the city in the fall of 1993 indicated traffic was the "worst
problem" in the city, shouldn't the plan include provision for implementing a study for
improvement of traffic patters as they exist: now and in future? Shouldn't new routes or
means for solving current traffic problem be explored or incorporated into
growth/development plans?
. Recognize that we have an other city that was not designed for effective traffic flow.
. Focus on correcting current traffic problem first. Since town is becoming more oftourist
area, can we manage tourist traffic to avoid residential areas.
12
Comment: The plan will examine existing traffic problems and propose changes to improve the
situation. In some cases, recommendations for future special studies will be proposed to carry
out the intent of the comprehensive plan. The city is currently preparing a detailed traffic study
for the Deerpath area,
.
Residential Traffic Issues
. Reduce volume and speed (25 mph) on high volume residential city streets to protect
children and other pedestrians, reduce noise, protect property values, ensure quality of life
in residential neighborhoods.
. Route traffic away from residential streets. This contrasts with the city's proposal to
"route traffic to collector and arterial roads". Identified problem areas include: South
Third and South Fourth Streets and Pine Street (between County Road 5 and South
Fourth Street) and other streets. Route traffic to appropriate highways and county roads.
Utilize bypass loop on Highway 15 to 96 to 95 to keep outside traffic off city residential
streets. Develop a coordinated plan to improve traffic flow on 5 and 15.
Comment: The state controls traffic speeds on local streets. The control speed is 30 mph. To
the extent possible, traffic can be routed from residential streets, In some cases residential
streets are collectors and because of their location carry through traffic. Without providing an
alternative for residential traffic rerouting, traffic ?nly make th,e impact to, other residential
areas. ·
The city is actively working with the county on county roads and the state on Highway 36 to
make improvements to reduce through traffic in residential areas. As has been stated many time,
the construction of a new Highway 36 bridge will reduce traffic on Third and Fourth Streets,
Pine, Greeley, Owens, Myrtle, Main and Chestnut Streets. This new bridge would eliminate
much of the cut through trafjic that is experienced by residential areas next to the above
mentioned streets,
.
Downtown Traffic Issues.
. Improve timing of downtown lights for through traffic and pedestrians. Improve
downtown flow which will reduce traffic through neighborhoods.
. Keep truck traffic off of Main Street and the bridge.
. Covert all or part of levee road to pedestrian use only.
. An increase in service businesses downtown would help alleviate trips through residential
areas to get to Highway 36 shopping area.
Comment: The city has worked with MnDOT on traffic signals and truck traffic, Last year,
13
.
Ie
.
.
large trucks were eliminatedfrom Main Street and the bridge and the signals are checked to
make sure they maximize the flow of traffic. The bridge lift schedule was arranged last year
(J 994) and modified to improve bridge traffic flow and reduce congestion downtown.
The underlying problem is too much traffic. The new Highway 36 bridge will address that
problem. Sixty percent (60%) of downtown traffic is through traffic and does not need to go
through downtown. A new bridge will eliminate many of those trips.
New Bridge and Highway 36 Improvements
. The bridge is identified as the solution to traffic in each alternative. Other measures to
reduce traffic and expected impact on basic traffic levels are not shown in the plan
alternatives. What is the bridge doesn't go in for several years? (In the meantime, traffic
will only get worse if we expand). The timing of growth should coincide and not occur
until after the bridge is started.
. With new bridge coming (and subsequent growth in Wisconsin and Stillwater population)
shouldn't improvement to Highway 36 be addressed in Stillwater at same time.
Specifically, shouldn't stoplights be removed to make roadway safer, improve flow and
protect neighborhoods from motorists cutting through residential areas.
. Interim measures (until the bridge goes in) and other re~ommendeq improvements to the
traffic issue should be addressed in the cOrr1prehensive plan?
Comment: Highway 36 is a state highway and serves the overall state and region. Growth in
Stillwater will have some effect on travel demand but most of the trips on 36 come from outside
the city of Stillwater which is not controlled by the Stillwater comprehensive plan. The state is
considering upgrading Highway 36 and changing to afreewayfrom an expressway. This was
met with opposition from the businesses located along Highway 36. The long-term plan,
however, is to convert 36 to afreeway when needed and acceptable to the community.
Impact of Growth Alternatives on Traffic
. The amount of population growth from each alternative will have an impact on traffic.
How will various growth alternatives impact residential streets with current traffic
problems? Will certain major roads need to be expanded or new roadways identified to
accommodate increased traffic? Which one?
. Citizens request a general impact on key congested raids be presented with each
alternative.
Comment: The impact of land use plan alternative will be prepared and a consideration of final
plan selection. In addition to the City of Stillwater growth in the Stillwater planning area and
14
Washington County growth impact will be considered on key major streets and roads.
Enforcement and Controls
.
. Develop controls for enforcing current/new traffic rules (e.g., noise ordinances, more
police patrolling, more signs, etc.). Explore use of signs discourage traffic through
residential areas and the use of additional stop signs for school and other safety concerns.
Comments: These enforcement and traffic management techniques will be considered to
implement the comprehensive plan. Enforcement is a function of staffing and budget priorities.
Signs have been installed indicating residential traffic only but it is difficult to evaluate the
effectiveness of such signage.
Candidates for stop signs can be brought to the police department and public works for study
and consideration. Traffic safety will be a consideration in installing stop signs. Other
considerations are traffic flow, noise and energy consumption.
Other Traffic Suggestions
. Does the plan address aesthetic traffic issues-buffers of nature around town from major
entries to Stillwater?
. Waterfront should retain access for elderly or handicapped to allow for riverview?
- "' I
.
. Stress carpooling, park and ride, shuttle for Andersen Windows, Cub Office.
.
Comment: The comprehensive plan policies recommend special design treatment for streets that
carry heavy traffic in residential areas. The county comprehensive plan designates Highway 95
and 96 scenic highways with special signage and setbacks to preserve the scenic qualities,
Guidepost policy calls for screening and buffering of major roads in the transition area,
Access is provided via levee roadfor the handicapped and elderly. With the improvements of the
Lowell Park/Levee wall. The levee and park will be completely accessible to the handicapped.
Andersen Windows has an extensive car pool and van sharing program. Some proposed plan
alternatives A, Band F provide parking lots at key locations for car pooling and park and ride
lots, A location for a park and ride lot in the Stillwater Market Place development area is being
considered by MnDOT, the Met Council and the City of Stillwater,
All plan alternatives include an extensive pathway/trailway/sidewalk system that will enhance
walking and biking.
Parks and Recreation
Issue Summary
15
.
.
..
.
.
There is strong support for improving and maintaining existing parks and recreation facilities
in Stillwater citizens are particularly concerned about safety issues such as lighting, road and
trail access and equipment. Involving neighborhood residents in parks and recreation
decision and using existing facilities (armory, schools, parks, etc.) rather than building new
ones also received much support.
Before annexation or development projects are approved by the city, citizens would like to
see them meet specific guidelines and criteria concerning:
. The percentage of land being designated as parks in newly developed areas.
. Special features and best use of the property.
. Actual costs and how projects will be funded.
There is consensus that all ages should be included in parks and trail development plans.
people also desire a careful analysis of the actual costs for improvements and a funding plan
before new park areas and facilities are developed.
Comment: The above is a statement about parks planning. The statement will be considered in
developing the parks element of the plan. The parks policy of the plan calls for 10 percent of the
development land to be dedicatedfor park purposes, This dedication would be required when
the property is proposed for subdivision. The final plan will consider the cost of new parks to
develop and maintain. These recommendations haye beenforw.arded to the parks and recreation
commission for consideration in parks planning. ·
Maintaining Existing Parks and Facilities
. Park areas receiving special mention were Lowell Park, the South Hill Athletic Field,
Lily Lake, the playground on Mulberry behind the school and sidewalks.
. Be sure the comprehensive plan includes provisions for sidewalks in existing.
neighborhoods; add sidewalk from Stillwater to Oak Park Mall.
. Identify existing vacant land in the city and rate properties for future park needs.
Comment: The parks elements of the comprehensive plan will determine areas with park
deficiencies and propose new parks to satisfy those deficiencies.
Lowell Park will be extended and upgraded in 1996, The cost of maintenance of new and exiting
parkfacilities is a consideration offor plan implementation. The city of Stillwater does have
sidewalks to its boarder along Fourth Street leading to Oak Park Mall. Areas of Oak Park
between Orleans and the mall need sidewalk construction.
. Improve and connect trails to include bike paths along the river, busy roads, to the
16
shopping malls and Stillwater, Area High School.
.
. Create trails through some ravines, but consider security and impact on neighborhoods.
Protect the ravines from development.
Comment: The comprehensive plan will contain a trails element in the parks section. Trails are
proposed along the river in downtown, along Curve Crest Blvd. and County Road 5 to the
Stillwater Market Place project and high school and connect with the County Road 12 trail.
Ravine trial development is calledfor in the plan after careful study, McKusick ravine is
mentioned as a ravine with opportunity for a trail.
New Parks and Recreation Facilities
. Is the plan sensitive to neighborhoods of new facilities and parks?
. Does the plan include guidelines to insure aesthetically appealing sites? (natural settings,
not like Lily Lake Center) and restricting development that would have a negative impact.
. Does the plan include neighborhood parks and neighborhood centers?
. Create a public trail around Long Lake.
. Give preference to "low tech" facilities such as paths and walkways, a public swimming
beach, etc.
. Determine if utilization of park areas outweighs their costs?
. Have a variety of park spaces, having a direct relationship to local neighborhood access
and usage. Examples: ~.,
. Parks within walking distance from Staples Ridge and Oak Glen, off Lake McKusick
Road
. Reopen the 37 -acre park across the river and create bike and foot paths along the old
Stillwater bridge.
. Plan for more sports related park areas for youth and adults
. Place new or expanded parks in old growth areas where there is high density housing
. Provide a community center that serves all age groups.
.
Comments: Most city parkfacilities area already in place. New parks in developing areas will
be located during the subdivision process based on site conditions and surrounding
development, A consideration in citing parks is their suitability with adjacent areas and uses.
Neighborhood parks are developed with neighborhood and park and recreation commission
input. Benson Park plan was recently prepared using this planning process. The proposed
comprehensive plan proposes replanning many of the existing parks to make sure they meet the
need of the neighborhood in which they are located. Neighborhood parks are a neighborhood
focal point of activity and identity, Convenient trailway or sidewalks access will be provided to
new neighborhood parks.
A public trail is proposed on the west side of Long Lake. Croixwood is already developed and it
is not feasible to locate a trail completely around Long Lake, The parks and recreation
17
.
'.
~
.
.
commission will determine the type ofparkfacility that is appropriate for different areas in the
park plan.
Funding Considerations
. Citizens desire an accounting of what it will cost over time to operate a community
center; one possibility is to consider private investors.
. To save $$ on park development, consider ways to encourage people to donate money,
land or facilities to the city through wills, conservation easements, etc., and honor them
with a plaque at the site.
. To save $$ on park maintenance, consider involving citizens in park patrol, clean up and
general maintenance. Examples:
. A community service project for offenders.
. A special work program for disabled persons.
. City needs a provision that will permanently protect park land from future development.
Comment: When a community center is being considered, the cost of construction as well as the
cost of operating will be a consideration of the project. The type of center,that is being
constructed and what facilities are provided will ilflpact the costs of construction as well as
expected operating expenses. It has been suggested that the users of the facility and not just
Stillwater residents pay for the facility. A broader area-wide, possibly school district authority,
could oversee the operation of a community-wide facility.
If a community center is constructed, all sources of funds will be considered for project
construction, operation and maintenance. Local foundations would be approached to contribute
to the community project. Volunteer efforts to construct and maintain parks are appreciated by
the city. Neighborhood groups and community organizations such as the Lions, Elks or Rotary
have helped build and maintain city parks in the past.
When designated in the comprehensive plan, city parks are protected from other uses. A recent
ordinance safeguards the conversion of city parks to other uses.
Evaluation of Alternatives
The ward network report showed the highest rating for Alternative E rural/cluster development at
township density followed by Alternative D rural large lot (2.5 acre) township development.
(Both of these alternatives do not call for extension of the city boundary.) Alternative F was
rated third followed by Alternative A. Alternative F was developed as an urban alternative based
on joint Stillwater/Stillwater Township guidepost natural resource protection and design policies.
18
The alternatives reflect an urban deqsity but less dense then Alternative A. Alternative A would
result in the greatest growth.
The results from the ward network meeting will be considered by the commission in making
their recommendation to the city council.
.;
Specific Design Criteria
The design criteria and illustrative drawing provide specific examples of how plan policies can
be incorporated into the plan and applied to development projects. The open space guidelines
can be used to plan park and open space areas and to review subdivision design. The housing
opportunities guidelines can be used to review housing project design. The neighborhood
commercial guideline provide design direction for planning neighborhood commercial projects in
context of the neighborhood and surrounding area.
Streetscape criteria can be used by the city and developers in developing more alternative
pedestrian friendly streets. The pedestrian pathway guidelines provide direction for the location
and construction of pathways when planning a specific area. The commercial economic
guidelines provide protection of surrounding areas from commercial development.
The design guidelines can be included as a part of the design element of the comprehensive plan
and used in preparing plan for existing city neighb~rhood areas. or plannin~ for new growth
areas. ·
Stillwater Area Open Space Committee Recommendation for Policy
.
The Stillwater New Citizens Open Space Committee recommended policies related to ravine
protection and management, natural resource area protection, enforcement of existing natural
resource protection regulations and the development of new regulations in tree preservation and
slope setback and preservation of natural areas through land purchase or park dedication. The
ongoing work of the open space committee in listing, describing and ranking open space
resources in the planning area will be useful in identifying sensitive areas and protecting those
areas through purchase, dedication or development project review. The recommendation of the
open space committee, to a large extent, are a part of the open space and natural resource and
parks and recreation facilities goals and polices and action section of the comprehensive plan
policies. The open space committee recommendation reenforces the policies and may provide a
major funding source for purchase of sensitive natural areas if a open space bond referendum is
passed.
The open space committee recommendations have been forwarded to the parks and recreation
commission for consideration in developing the parks element of the comprehensive plan.
19
.
.
~
.
.
RESULTS FROM STILL WATER/STILL WATER TOWNSHIP
JOINT TASK FORCE MEETINGS
Guideposts for Joint Planning
The following policies and principles were discussed and considered by the joint task force as
planning guideposts for cooperation between the city and township.
The guideposts are the result of six-months of meetings and discussion and reflects a consensus
of direction, although neither the City of Stillwater nor Stillwater Township have officially
endorse the statements.
Overall Planning
Determine the desired growth rate and phasing of urban services to accommodate planned for
growth as needed for the urban-rural transition planning area (URTPA) for the 25-year planning
period 1995 - 2020.
NOTE: The urban-rural transition planning area (URTP A) is the area west of
Stillwater currently in Stillwater Township bordered by Dellwood Road (TH 96),
on the north, Manning Avenue (CR 15) on the west and Highway 36 on the south.
This area represents the ultimate future plaJ?lling area fo.r the City ~f Stillwater.
.
Skeleton Framework
New development will respect the environmental framework of the plan. This framework
includes wetlands, woodlands, windbreaks and sloped areas.
Natural drainage systems shall be used in new development areas to promote the recharge of
water tables and to reduce the speed and amount of run off.
Views from major public roads of new development in the URTP A shall be screened by existing
vegetation and land forms, new landscaping, wetlands and greenways. Major public roads
include Dellwood Road, Manning Avenue, McKusick Road, Boutwell Avenue and Highway 36.
Any new non-residential development shall be buffered from all adjacent residential uses,
connected by trails to residential areas and appear visually subdued in a landscaped setting as
viewed from public roads.
Design new subdivisions to minimize through traffic and when necessary design neighborhood
collector streets with greater setbacks, landscaping and pedestrian and bike trails.
Create new neighborhoods in city growth areas that retain elements of Stillwater's small town
1
identity, appearance and character.
Develop special design guidelines and performance standards using the planned unit
development process to implement visual screening, park, open space and trailway and natural
resource policies.
.
Available Areas for Development
There are approximately 500 acres of vacant land in the URTP A to be developed at either
township and city densities.
Preserve historic resources and unique land forms in growth area to maintain elements of the
areas past and provide and identity to new development.
Park, Recreation, Open Space Development
Develop an overall trail system for the URTP A areas that connects new residential development
areas to existing and proposed trials on McKusick Road, Myrtle Street and County Road 5 and
connects all residential areas in the URTP A from Dellwood Road to 62nd Street.
New residential development areas should include desirable design elements from existing city
neighborhoods including a mix of housing types, l~ndscaped streets, acces:;ible neighborhood
parks and open space areas and a unique neighborlfood images.
Require new development to provide 10 percent of the development residential land area or its
equivalent for neighborhood (7 percent) and community parks (3 percent).
.
Cityffownship Land Use
Try to locate within the planning area an elementary school site, 10 acres, and community park,
25 acres. (Good planning in either case.)
Require a detailed environmental assessment of physical site conditions including plant and
animal communities, topography, soil, drainage and wetlands before land development planning
begins.
Density
Use new development concepts, where appropriate, such as mixed use development and cluster
housing, to provide life cycle housing opportunities, minimize the need for and use of the
automobile and maintain open space.
Use ghost platting and cluster development to allow some initial growth with the opportunity for
2
.
.
~
.
.
urban density development in the future when desired and planned.
Establish lot size and other development standards for the URTP A areas in the township that
accommodate future urban development according to the Stillwater comprehensive plan.
If new residential development areas are developed at city densities, design elements from
existing city neighborhoods including a mix of housing types landscaped streets, accessible
neighborhood parks and open space areas and unique neighborhood images.
Coordination and Implementation Structure
Establish Joint Planning Board to coordinate planning between the City of Stillwater and
Stillwater Township so both city and township plans for the URTPA are consistent.
Use orderly annexation agreements, joint power agreements and municipal urban service area
extension agreements to coordinate and implement comprehensive plan growth phasing policy.
Elements of these agreements may include:
Defining a rural taxing district so existing residents will be protected from unreasonable
taxes.
No adverse economic affects to existing to~ship resid~nts by MUSA extension into the
URTP A for urban development.
Establish 5-year planning periods for overall growth phasing.
Any implementation of Comp Plan for the URTP A shall have input from the township
and city.
Key Planning Concepts for URTP A
The following key planning concepts provide direction for the preparation of the comprehensive
plan. The concepts will be a part of the comprehensive plan for the city and township and shall
be used to guide special area planning.
Greenways/Open Space Definition
Greenways shall be established along Manning Ave, Dellwood Blvd, Myrtle Street, McKusick
Road and Boutwell Drive. The greenways shall be 100 - 200 feet in width depending on the
location and site conditions. The purpose of the green way is primarily to preserve the natural
semi-rural character of the transition area by screening new development from major public
roads. The greenway shall appear informal and natural using native indigenous plant material
adapted to existing topographic conditions. Enhancement of existing topographic or vegetative
3
conditions is encouraged to the extent the eQhancement appears natural. Wetland mitigation sites
may be used as part of the greenway. Pathways may be located along side or in the greenway but
not appear as a primary design element of the greenway. The green way will provide a landscape
separation between newly developing residential areas and high volume traffic corridors.
.
Trailways, Parks and Open Space Areas
Trailways, neighborhood and community park and open space areas will be provided throughout
the URTPA. The extensive Brown's Creek Wetland systems shall provide the framework for
park and open space resources preservation in the north portion of the transition area. Long Lake
and existing woodlands and windbreaks shall be used in the southern portion of the site for trail
locations. An overall system of trails connecting new neighborhoods from Dellwood Blvd to
62nd Streets shall be planned along wetlands, new natural drainage ways and wooded areas.
Within neighborhoods pathways shall conveniently connect residents to neighborhood park and
open space areas separated from auto traffic. Any active community park, convenience
commercial use or school site shall be clearly connected to surrounding residential areas by
walkways and bike path, utilize and preserve natural areas for trail locations.
Development Pattern and Density
~
The overall character of the transition areas shall be single family with selected locations of
compact clustered attached housing. The existing semi-rural character of the areas north of
McKusick Road (Random Creek) and south of Boutwell (Spring Creek) shall remain with some
in fill at rural densities.
.
Newly developed areas shall be large lot ( 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acres DU/Acre), small lot
(2 to 3 DU/Acre) or higher density attached housing at 4 - 6 DU/Acre.
Lar~e. lot sin~le family areas are located in areas of sensitive sites. Because of topography
wetlands, lakes or timberland conditions the amount of site disruption is limited. These areas
tend to be located on steeply sloped or wooded shorelands or adjacent to sensitive wetlands or
open space areas. A cluster development concept could work in this area to minimize the impact
on the land.
Small. lot sin~le family areas tend to be in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. These
sites can be interior to the large lot area or setback form open space areas. These sites are the
flatter com or hay fields of the URTPA. The development density of the small lot area is typical
of the existing city.
Attached or compact housin~ areas are located in pockets separated visually and physically from
single family areas. These locations have good direct access to major roads and are more closely
tied to existing urbanized areas. Sites for compact housing area located on County Road 5, 62nd
near 15, Myrtle Street south and west of Long Lake, possibly McKusick Road (west of
4
.
.
.
.
mitigation site) and pockets south of Dellwood Blvd.
Convenience Commercial Locations. The purpose of this use is to provide services and products
for the surrounding residential areas to reduce auto use. The sites should be clearly connected
by pathways to adjacent residential areas, be of a residential scale and style compatible with the
adjacent residential areas.
Office park or research and development areas. These locations provide a job base for the
surrounding residential areas and tax base for the community. These sites should have
convenient access to major roads, be visually and physically separated from residential areas, be
attractively designed and landscaped to fit into the site conditions.
The plan will respect current uses as they relate to assessment policy and any required land use
changes.
~
5
Land Use
Residential
Single Family
Large Lot
Small Lot
Compact
Totals
ALTERNATIVE "F"
Acres
(1.0 - 1.5 DU/ Acre)
(2.0 - 3.0 DU/Acre)
(4.0 - 6.0 DU/Acre)
98
265
125
488
.
C:\ WPWlN60\ WPDOCS\RESUL TS.SR
6
DU
.
100-150
530-795
500-750
1,130-1,695
.
.
.
.
.
J
LEGEND
~ WETLANDS/DRAINAGE WAYS
~ BUFFER
~ WOODLANDS
C2iJ OPEN SPACE
o SINGLE-FAMILY
@ TOWNHOMES
CID RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
_...... TRAIL
ALTERNATIVE "F"
land Use
RcsiJclllinl
Single Family
large LOI (1.0. I.S DU/Acre)
Small LOI (2.0.3.0 OIJ/ACfC)
Compacl (4.0 - 6.0 DUlAcre)
Tal'lls
ALTERNATIVE E I 400 TOTAL D.U.'S*
* within designated areas
tlliJa ill.!
98 100.)50
265 530.795
125 500.750
488 1.130-1.695
.
STILLVvATER TOWN. BOARD
RESOLUTION
REGARDING
GUIDEPOST DOCUMENT
~
.
The Stillwater Town Board recognizes the progress that
has been made in developing a cooperative dialogue on
joint planning of the URPT ~ Area ~nd enqorses the
concept of creating a mechanism of joint coordination
and implementation for control and development of the
URPTA Area.
.
.
..
.
.
.
Scenario 2
Growth and. Preservation
I
~v
U y ,-rG
/
Washington County Comprehensive Plan
. .
Urban ExpansionlTransition Areas
Locations within the. MUSA would continue to' accommodate staged serviced
residential, commercial and industrial growth. The County would look favorably on
municipal requests for orderly annexation and extensions of the MUSA. . Lots in
township locations immediately adjacent to a serviced municipality would be required
to be kept sufficiently large (10 acres) so that they later could be resubdivided to urban
densities when the MUSA is extended into these areas.
. Suburban'
. Rural Centers 1116 D.U. per 40 Acres
. Commercial/Industrial. 8 D. U.' per 40 Acres
. Airports ~ 4 D.U. per 40 Acres
. Parks BiJ 2 D. U. per 40 Acres
.Mining ~ 1 D. U. per 40 Acres
.
..
.
.
SCHEDULE FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Phase I
August 1993 - January 1994
Phase II
February 1993 - November 1994
February - March 1995
Phase III
March - April 1995
May 1995
June 1995
Actions
Completed
(X)
Identification of key planning issues, and collection
and analysis of information regarding traffic, housing,
land use, parks, public facilities and open space. Ii]
Preparation of goal and actions to guide future
growth and development of community. []
Preparation of plan alternatives and presentation
of alternatives to community for comment. W
. ~ ---:;,.....:._-~~. ..-~--- .... ...............-
'-;;.--:-.-:...- .:,~~'--
:~I:~f:~~~fv~:regariling planning i~utsj~2:~:~~~~1
Stillwater city/township joint task force input on:'7.-=.~':'::'f;L~~:z.ic;~
alternati ve plCjl1s.'~"- h~' '~~'~iS:tif;~::~
.. . ';1"-: - - ~., '''_
~ _...~--.-' .: ::,<'-~7!f.'4:.;!~t7ii.
Planning commission recommend plan alternative "'L-::.-~-?:,::::~~i~=::;:',
to city council. . ,'. D ::'~:~~:-~~-='.:'?t~~~
.~.- : ~"'.:-.
-... -~:~.~-;-~~;:~~.~
:.o<._-~-:___:";;;'~;';C:
City council review planning commission
recommendation and direct preparation of new
comprehensive plan. 0
Planning commission and city council hold
public hearings and adopt new comprehensive
plan. * 0
City submit new comprehensive plan to
metropolitan council for approval. 0
*When specific dates for planning commission and city council public hearings are set, notices
will be published in the local newspapers and mailed to the comprehensive plan mailing list.
... - ...
. DOHERTY
RlTMBLE
-,~~~
.
i
I.
~
3300 Fiith Street To",er>
130 South Fiith Street
r-.linnt.'aptllis, ~'1innl.'sot.l 35-102--1233
Telephnne (612) 34()-3j3j
FAX (612) 340-j384
2&X) Minnesota World Tradl' Center
30 East Sewnth Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota ::;3Hll.-Il)\)lj
\'I,'grud,'r Budding
162, XI Street. \: \\',
\\'ashln~t,'n, D,C. 2003h-321l3
rdeph~1rw (2112) 293-ll553
FA \ i2(2) ~:;q-046h
2370 One T.lb\lf Cl.'Ilk'1"
L:!OO Sen_'ntl'l'nth ~tft'\..t
Dt.'nn'f. CI.,I\\r.h.io Sl)2(l2-3S2~
Tekph,me (30J) '>72-h200
FAX (3lH) :;72-1>203
Telephone (1)12) 291-9333
FAX (1)12) 29)-9J13
Allorneys at Law
\\'rih.'f'S difect dialllumber:
Reply t,) \1inrwapnlis nft"l(t'
340-5571
January 20, 1995
DELIVERED BY MESSENGER
Stillwater Planning Commission
c/o Steve Russell
Community Development Director
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: Updated Guidepost Document
Dear Mr. Russell:
I have been asked by three developers/home builders to write on their
behalf relative to the Updated Guidepost Document transmitted by your
memorandum dated January 6, 1995 (the Guideposts) for what is described
as the Urban-Rural Transition Planning Area (URTPA). The developer/
builders are: Arcon Development, Inc.; Charles Cudd Co.; Hans Hagen
Homes. Together, they currently control approximately 395 acres within
the URTPA. At the request of Don Ringrose of BRW, Inc. I also provide
some information regarding another 173 acres, owned by Art and Winnie
Palmer.
I include with this letter Land Use Concept Plans and narrative
descriptions which embody sophisticated and sensitive site planning for
the individual parcels substantially consistent with Alternative F and
nearly all of the Guideposts for Joint Planning stated in the Updated
Guidepost Document. The differences found in each of the Land Use
Concept Plans between the Alternative F land use map and the Guideposts
represent a more detailed analysis of the particular natural elements and
man-made constraints of the individual sites, a knowledge of the
economics of site development, and housing market awareness.
Together, the Land Use Concept Plans contain a mix of housing types, lot
sizes and prices, and home/neighborhood maintenance and enhancement
regimes. The fact that each of these highly-respected developer/builders
has appeared on the scene at a time which coalesces with the City and
Township of Stillwater's joint and separate planning efforts for the
URTPA presents a singular opportunity for public/private partnership to
respond to the growth needs of Stillwater. Each of the developer/
uilders is eager to work with Stillwater in 1995 to capitalize on this
opportunity. The group's business plans require resolution of all issues
related to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, orderly annexation, and MUS A
amendment for their properties by early-Fall, 1995.
As evidence of their commitment to cooperation and 1995 resolution of the
fundamental growth questions affecting Stillwater in 1995, each has
prepared the Land Use Concept Plans and narrative descriptions which are
.J-'"
DOHERTY
RUMBLE
& BUTLER
i 'Rl' 1'1' -;,; I ()".\ t.,\ S'iOC L\ Tin"
. Stillwater Planning Commission
January 20, 1995
Page 2
.
enclosed. Each has commented with respect to the specific consistencies,
and minor differences, with the Guideposts and Alternative F. The group
members strongly endorse adoption and expeditious implementation of
Alternative F with timely, adequate infrastructure, bypassing any need
for "ghost platting" in theURTPA as to the properties controlled by
them.
The Guideposts evidence a quite strong concern for open space
preservation, including the requirement of 10% dedication of residential
land area for parks/open space. Each of the Land Use Concept Plans
reflects contemplated open space dedication well in excess of 10%. All
forms of open space dedication and development should count in the
calculation, inclusive of neighborhood and community parks, trailways and
developed trails and greenways. Beyond the amount and location of open
space dedication consented to by landowners in excess of 10%, the
developer/builders will expect some form of compensation for the excess.
A Guideposts element with which there appears to be specific disagreement
is the suggestion that there be a 100 - 200 foot wide greenway along
certain of the major roads within the URTPA. The Land Use Concept Plans
which each has proposed honor the concepts of transition, greenway,
buffer, but do so in a variety of different ways to achieve the same
objectives. Differences exist with respect to open space locations and
configuration, but the overall amoqnt of open space dedication is
substantially in excess of the Guideposts 10% suggestion. Moreover, the
Land Use Concept Plans have been formulated with the reasonable
assumption that the Guideposts and attached land use concept plan map
reflect objectives, but not hard and fast quantitative measures or
inflexible lines on the map.
.
In sum, the Group urges the Planning Commission to recommend Alternative
F to the City Council, expedite the Comprehensive Plan amendment process
to reflect Alternative F, integrate nearly all of the Guideposts
objectives into the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and proceed to work
with us to implement Alternative F in the first half of 1995, including
timely extension of utilities. We will attend the Planning Commission
meeting of January 23rd.
Sincerely yours,
~(~/7Ar;;;;J
David C. Sellergren 2f -
DCS/eka
Enclosures
cc: Rick Packer, Arcon Development,
Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen Homes
Mark Putman, Charles Cudd Co.
Don Ringrose, BRW, Inc.
Inc.
Des 73518
..
1.
9:00
2.
3.
9:00
4.
9:30
5.
9:40
6.
7.
8. 9:50
9. 10:00
TO
10:30
10. 10:40
TO
11:25
11. 11:30
TO
12:30
12. 12:30
TO
1:30
13. 1:30
TO
It 3:00
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Dennis C. Hegberg
~istrict 1
COUNfY BOARD AGENDA
JANUARY 24, 1995, 9:00 A.M.
Mary Hauser
District 2
Welly Abrahamson
District 3/Chalrman
Myra Petereon
~istrict 4
Dave Engstrom
~istrict 5
ROLL CALL
CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - D. WISNIEWSKI, DIRECTOR
CITY OF WOODBURY REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM TRAFFIC SIGNAL
COST PARTICIPATION POLICY
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - J. SCHUG, ADMINISTRATOR
DISCUSSION FROM THE AUDIENCE
VlSTTORS AUY SHARE 711ElR CONCERNS WTlll'/HE COUNIT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON ANY TlF:M NOT ON '/HE AGENDA. '/HE CHAIR WIlL DIRECT
'/HE COUNIT ADMINJS1RATOR TO PREPARE RESPONSES TO YOUR CONCERNS. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED NOT TO BE REPEITTIOUS OF PREVIOUS SPEAKERS
AND TO UMrr YOUR ADDRESS TO FIVE MINUTES.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS - COMMENTS - QUESTIONS
7HJS PERIOD OF TIME SHAIL BE USED BY '/HE COMMISSIONERS TO REPORT TO '/HE FUlL BOARD ON COM,M1ITEE AC11V1IIES. MAKE COMMENTS ON
AUTI'ERS OF INTEREST AND /NFORMA710N. OR lWSE QUES710NS 10 '/HE STAFF. nuS AC110N IS NOT INTENDED TO RESULT IN SUBSTANllVE
BOARD AC110N DURING 7HJS TIME. ANY AC110N NECESSARY lJECAUSE OF DISCUSSION wzu. BE SCHEDULED FOR A FUroRE lJOARD MEEI/NG.
BOARD CORRESPONDENCE
ADJOURN
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON CSAH 10/CSAH 15 INTERSECTION AND PARK
ACQUISITION FUNDING FOR GREY CLOUD ISLAND
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION - ROOM B
UPDATE ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH H.E.L.M. DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
COUNTY ROLE IN PLANNING AND ZONING AFTER ADOPTION OF THE
REVISED WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BREAK FOR LUNCH
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
TRAINING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
***MEETING NOTICES ON BACK***
If you n.ed .,,_11<:. due II> diability or Ien_ge berrier. p/Ha ...1/430-6003 (TDD 439-32201
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR **
JANUARY 24,1995
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
ITEM
.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
ADMINISTRATION
A.
APPROVAL OF THE JANUARY 3, 1995 BOARD MEETING MINUTES.
B. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS FOR COUNTY EXTENSION,
HISTORIC COURTHOUSE ADVISORY COUNCIL, AND REAPPOINTMENT TO
THE RRA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR 1995.
C. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH LEONARD PARKER
ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, TO CONDUCT AN EVALUATION OF THE
WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT FACILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO
ACCESSIBILITY PRESCRIBED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT.
ACCOUNTING & BUDGETING
D. APPROVAL TO ESTABLISH RESERVES AND DESIGNATIONS OF FUND
BALANCE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
E. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN WASHINGTON
COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES, NEKTON, INC., AND THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CONCERNING PARTICIPATION IN A
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ON PERFORMANCE BASED CONTRACTING FOR
SERVICES TO PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES.
F. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ST. PAUL CHAPTER OF THE
AMERICAN RED CROSS TO PROVIDE AFTER HOURS EMERGENCY SOCIAL
SERVICES.
G.
APPROVAL OF PROGRAM YEAR 19,93 (JULY)., 1993 TO JUNE 30, 1994)
JTPA ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR.
.
PUBLIC WORKS
H.
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PAINT STRIPER
TO M-B COMPANY.
I. APPROVAL OF 30 DAY EXTENSION TO THE NEED FOR EIS DECISION
DEADLINE FOR THE CSAH 16 PROJECT, BY THE SIGNATURE OF THE
COUNTY BOARD CHAIR ON THE LETTER TO THE MINNESOTA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD.
J. APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TWO ONE TON CAB AND CHASSIS FROM POLAR
CHEVROLET,. INC., AND ONE 1/2 TON PICKUP TO BE PURCHASED
THROUGH SUPERIOR FORD, THROUGH HENNEPIN COUNTY BID PER
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT.
SHERIFF
K.
APPROVAL OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL MOBILITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN
WASHINGTON COUNTY AND CITY OF ST. PAUL, DEPARTMENT OF POLICE,
FOR TED BROWN TO ASSUME THE DUTIES OF CHIEF DEPUTY WITH THE
WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.
..COQSent Calendar items are generally dermed as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to puU a Consent
Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
REMINDER: NO BOARD MEETING ON JANUARY 31, 1995, FIFTH TUESDAY
MEETING NOTICES
~
Date Committee Time Location
Jan. 24 Public Health Advisory 5:30 p.m. Washington County Government Center
Jan. 25 Solid Waste Mgmt. Cord. Brd. 10:30 a.m. 2099 University Ave. W. - st. Paul
Jan. 26 Community Corrections 7:30 a.m. Washington County Government Center
Jan. 26 Resource Recovery Board 8:30 a.m. 6989 55th St. N. , Suite C-Oakdale
Jan. 31 Planning Advisory Committee 7:00 p.m. , Washington County Government Center