HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-12-03 CC Packet
fI
AGENDA
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-29
Stillwater Public Library, 223 North Fourth Street
December 3, 1996
~
CALL TO ORDER "-
ROLL CALL
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
2. Police Chief
3. Public Works Director
4. Community Dev. Director
~
"'", ., .: 'q ,..:~:..,:";". .,:, .Y"~ "'.""" ,',:. ,.."~;'::J
4:00 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
5. 'P~ks & Recreation
,
6. City Engineer
7. Consulting Engineer
8. City Clerk
9. Fire Chief
10. Building Official
11. City Attorney
12. City Coordinator
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Update: Discussion with Territorial Prison Coalition representatives
2. Review of RFP's for St. Croix Valley Sports Complex
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL ~.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - O~' 1996 Special and Regular Meetings
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting
agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding
investigation of the concerns expressed.
CONSENT AGENDA *
1. Directing Payment of Bills. (Resolution No. 96-283)
2. 1997 Renewals of Liquor, Wine, Beer, and Cigarette Licenses (Resolution 96-284)
3. Contractors License: Kingwood Management (Renewal); HeIkes Tree Service (Renewal)
4. Authorize hiring process for Civil Engineer
5. Purchase of Autocad software update
6. Accepting Work and authorizing final payment, Good Samaritan Storm Sewer and Drainage
Improvents, L.I. 317 (Resolution)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and time for the Truth in Taxation public hearing.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on November 27, 1996.
-
2. Case No. SUB/96-70. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a minor
subdivision to divide an existing parcel into two lots of 2.36 and 1.37 acres located just east of
Baker's Square on the TH 36 Frontage Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District.
Robert Brackey, applicant. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on
November 22, 1996, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
~ . ;:.~- . .
,.,,,.$>."'1.... ---,,~~';.,_.:_,....
u~:!.,;._~~~L'.:.,:..,...
City Council Meeting 96-29
December 3, 1996
3. Case No. SOO/96-71. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a minor
subdivision to resubdivide (swap lands) the property located at 12811 62nd Street just west of the ..
comer of CR 5 and TH 36 in the CR & D, Campus Research District. James Bradshaw, applicant.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on November 22,
1996, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
4. Case No. SUB/96-73. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a subdivision of
the Maple Island Property into four lots of 13,000; 4,600; 4,600; and 16,500 feet located at 219
North Main Street in the CBD, Central Business District. Tim Stefan, applicant.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on November 22,
1996, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
5. Case No. ZAT\96-4. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a modification of
RA and RB zoning regulations regarding commercial uses (home occupations) in residential areas.
City of Stillwater, applicant.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on November 22,
1996, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Request for assistance: Stillwater Antiques
2. Approval of AUAR contract
NEW BUSINESS
1. Planning Commission recommendation: Surface water use of Long Lake
2. Planning Commission recommendation for consultant services for McKusick Lake area park plan
3. Resolution: Approving Final Plat, Interlachen Hills Third Addition
4. Consideration of continuation of contract with Legislative Associates
5. Appointment of city representative for Manning Avenue Corridor Study
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNlCA TIONSIREOUESTS
COUNCIL REOUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT ~....ev ~
~~
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which
event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
-
.~-"'......~-''""l_.llJ''__,.., _il_'
MEMORANDUM
tt
TO: Mayor and Council
FR: City Coordinator
RE: Park land acquisition
DA: November 26, 1996
The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City acquire a parcel of land
that is presently available to the city because it is tax forfeit property. The property is known as
the Augustine property. It is immediately east of Calibre Ridge and south of Forest Hills
Addition.
According to City and County records there is a balance of $133,749.48 of delinquent
assessments on the property. The assessments were to be used to pay for the cost of LI 251. If
the City were to acquire the property there would be a short fall in the amount we would have to
pay for the debt service on the bonds that were issued to finance LI 251. On the other hand, given
the topography of the site, the City would probably be asked to reduce the assessments if it was
purchased for development (i.e., the development costs and assessments would be to high for any
reasonable return on the development investment).
I should point out the City can acquire tax forfeiture property at no cost to the City except for the
assessments that are owed to the City. The assessments could be paid in one of two ways. One,
the City could levy a tax to pay the debt service or two, the City could transfer the appropriate
amount from the Capital Outlay fund which I understand has $130,000 budgeted for land
acquisition in 1996. I don't know of any other land that is available for purchase at this time
(of course the Finance Director should be consulted on this matter before any final decision is
made).
In any event I would strongly recommend that the Council give serious consideration to
acquiring this property. Parcels of land like this are becoming increasingly scarce and I think it
would be to the City's benefit to have this as an open space area.
1(JP-
e
'If 1
D
I
L...-___.-----
,:
.
o
:;!
.. ..
o
~
~
::
.
:D
J>
J
~
/
/
m
-=i'llG
.
n
:=r
--
~
1. S-
~ c. ~
r- ,<:) <9.. ~
......~ '"
~ .,; ,,\~
<:;: 0...-0 ~
~
.
.
.
I.
I
"'" . ~
INCOME TO DATE
MONTH BUILDING PLAN REV. PLBG. MECH. TOTAL
JANUARY $3,296.50 $1,132.30 $55.00 $265.00 $4,748.80
FEBRUARY $4,867.00 $1,356.88 $315.00 $440.00 $6,978.88
MARCH $10,840.00 $4,124.15 $440.00 $450.97 $15,855.12
APRIL $14,641.50 $5,293.93 $1,498.95 $3,881.54 $25,315.92
MAY $31,760.25 $13,069.06 $1,859.00 $2,292.49 $48,980.80
JUNE $24,044.50 $9,191.45 $1,884.00 $620.00 $35,739.95
JULY $21,684.00 $6,481.40 $1,288.00 $1,372.00 $30,825.40
AUGUST $9,039.25 $305.95 $2,159.00 $2,904.50 $14,408.70
SEPTEMBER $17,349.00 $6,597.12 $1,738.50 $2,317.40 $28,002.02
OCTOBER $13,588.50 $3,916.25 $480.00 $487.00 $18,471.75
NOVEMBER $10,494.50 $2,055.46 $627.00 $580.00 $13,756.96
DECEMBER $0.00
TOTAL $161,605.00 $53,523.95 $12,344.45 $15,610.90 $243,084.30
Page 1
.
.
.
,L; ....v
VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION TO DATE
MONTH BUILDING PLUMBING MECHANICAL ACCUMULATION
JANUARY $301,800.00 $3,800.00 $22,250.00 $327,850.00
FEBRUARY $459,400.00 $36,000.00 $28,700.00 $524,100.00
MARCH $5,618,000.00 $31,950.00 $33,782.00 $5,683,732.00
APRIL $1,879,400.00 $138,061.00 $895,672.00 $2,913,133.00
MAY $5,272,498.00 $313,500.00 $390,099.00 $5,976,097.00
JUNE $3,481,069.00 $254,050.00 $45,215.00 $3,780,334.00
JULY $2,641,895.00 $93,700.00 $121,892.00 $2,857,487.00
AUGUST $719,214.00 $205,795.00 $281,595.00 $1,206,604.00
SEPTEMBER $2,174,243.00 $130,967.00 $249,590.00 $2,554,800.00
OCTOBER $1,365,300.00 $37,300.00 $32,657.00 $1,435,257.00
NOVEMBER $893,283.00 $42,990.00 $36,642.00 $972,915.00
DECEMBER $0.00
TOTALS $24,806,102.00 $1,288,113.00 $2,138,094.00 $28,232,309.00
TOTAL VALUATION FOR 1995 = $24,654,214.00
TOTAL VALUATION FOR 1994 = $22,009,572.00
TOTAL VALUATION FOR 1993 = $39,394,302.00
Page 1
.
.
.
.' .. .....
INSPECTION DATA
PERMITS ISSUED 1994 1995 1996 INSPECTIONS 1994 1995 1996
JANUARY 45 40 20 JANUARY 269 172 79
FEBRUARY 47 46 39 FEBRUARY 295 89 72
MARCH 75 67 51 MARCH 211 111 94
APRIL 72 120 100 APRIL 281 205 149
MAY 83 111 114 MAY 201 213 192
JUNE 83 85 113 JUNE 186 221 210
JULY 109 91 106 JULY 201 180 227
AUGUST 165 99 45 AUGUST 292 220 217
SEPTEMBER 145 73 107 SEPTEMBER 303 133 232
OCTOBER 89 100 82 OCTOBER 188 146 210
NOVEMBER 91 68 71 NOVEMBER 276 163 145
DECEMBER 48 41 DECEMBER 112 157
TOTAL 1052 941 848 TOTAL 2,815 2,010 1,827
LIVING UNITS CON TRUCT ED
~ B.LOG UNITS 1995 BLDGS UNITS 1m BLDGS UNITS
SINGLE FAMILY 129 129 44 44 16 16
TOWNHOUSE 4 8 2 20
TWIN HOMES 1 2 10 2Q 11 22
TOTALS 134 139 56 84 27 38
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS DURIN G 1991, 1 92, 199 ,1994, 1995 cod e cycles = 731
Page 1
~ .
At
-
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director V'"
DA: November 21, 1996
RE: UPDATE ON SALE OF TERRITORIAL PRISON LAND FOR HOTEL
Attached is an update from the Territorial Coalition regarding the progress and status of
the prison project. Changes have been made in the design of the project for financing
purposes (letter enclosed).
It is suggested that the developers be at the Council meeting December 3rd to answer
any questions regarding an extension of the closing date for sale of the prison land.
A subdivision of the property is scheduled for the planning commission meeting of
December 9th. Mn Dot is preparing papers for conveyance of the wayside property to
the city.
Although the project has been informally.in front of the Heritage Preservation
Commission, it still requires city design permit approval.
Recommendation: Extension of development agreement closing date to an appropriate
specific date to allow developers to obtain project financing.
Enclosure: Letter from John Lange - 11-19-96
..::".."""'.....0""'-.;./,',_
',,:/~'- .0";-'.::- ,-,<',':.... ~_-;'-~~~-;;'i:-,~:.~.:;;<;,;,~~~-rr~:_~--; ;'""~~~'::;';":'~':~,":i~;,m~~<;ii'f&;'~~i"I<;_;':-::';;:t.i:f:~'."l._~,r;J;;;:,::':;:r~;;~.~;,~~i:-;~~"i..~ki'~4~"'~;.:.;~~.;.~':::S:~_:';;2~_~~~~.:~-;;~ ;':::'C':' -
1/5
... Messerli
&
Kramer P.A.
Telecopier Transmittal Sheet
'J'elecopier: (612) 672~3777
Attorneys at Law
1800 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
:Minneapolis, MN 55402-4218
Telephone: (612) 672-3600
r
. The ~n./Ol"mCUion co17.t4ln.ed in. th18 (ncslmile message i$ atu,rney privileged and confidential inforrrw.tion
intended for the. use afthe iruUuiduaJ or en.tity n.amed below. If the rea,der of this me88age is no!' the
., in.tenckd recipient., ort/~ employee or agent respon.sible to deliver it to tht intended l'ecip~n.t, you CLre
; hereb1notified that any disse.miruJ.tion, dist,.ibution or copying of this communirotion is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this ~ in, error', ple.a.se immediately notify us by telephone, and return
the o~iginal message to us at the above address via. tM U. S. PotJtal SerlJiee at our expense.
PATE~
Novemher 19. 1996
TO:
Stillwater City Council
~ ...~
TELECOPIER No.:
439-0456
FROM:
John 'WJLane:. Esa.
Direct Dial #: (612) 672-3614
NO. OF PAGES:
5
. including tbis cover page.
If you do not receive all pages, or are experiencing other problems in transmission,
please call Linda Gerlach (612) 672-3638. Thank you.
COMMENTS:
e
File Name:
ID. #
File Number:
Transmission:
Regular X
Confidential
L~G:lkg:l~170_1
..._.,;~ -~.!>':~,:<~". _.;~ :<t'''~~'-~~~, ~_ '''---.:;r.'':'-
'l:~.....?'f;?/-~~',~-;,,~.:~,~:"','~i_.:~~~""::~<} ::":~, -'::
:~~:~:.~::?~_Y" :', .
(;TU~)yQ;'-t9:9~;17:06/ST. 16: 49/NO. 3~6098.30_60. P 21.5' co,
&"k'RAM'ERP:A,."' .--'
ATTOA.NltyS "T L"W
JOSEPH w. LAWVER
"."~"lI\l .......I'IC!:1.
ANN "". 15ETNES
JOH.... F. APITZ
V'NCI!:/'IT 0. P;L......
I-'NO.... a. JENSEN
L.I;AI'IN': O. UTF/N
WILLIAM S. SUTLER
,,1:1l'1l"Ue,. .... IELL..l'
MADHVL'Ki\ ,,1>,,"
.........TIN" ...UI!:"'ZM.....l!:~
DENISE L. "'/:lAM6
LYNN M. N,CHOL.S
........<;1.... ". O_~I;
STEPHANI M. IolINZE
P....UL L. $(;I1UI.T4
AO........ J. SFUNI<MAroIN
""".lIA,", F. ,.., I:S5ltJltc.1
R055 E. KRAMER
TOM TOGAS
I!IONALD e. PETERSON
MARK S. LARSON
PQAJ;RT G. FlENNeR, .JR.
OEORGE R. SEFlOAR
GI'IN"""" ... NIUIl!:N
CHRISTOPHER B. HUNT
.10111'1 A. DI:"TTIl!:
.JAMES C. WICKA
DANIEI...J. 001.01:111:1'10
JOSEPH B. ....'ERENBERG
WIL.L.I....,.. C. HICKS
WILLIAM M. HABICHT
JOHN .,.,. LA"'G
PAUL w. ANOF.:~SO"
SUl;:AN M. LACH
\600 FirTH STREET TOW~R!i5
150 SOUTH F"IF"TH eTR~ET
MINNEAPOLIS, I"IINNESOTA 55402-.01.21&
(eI2) 572-3600
FACSIMIl.E (612) 572-3777
AUTllClltfZl:::> ~ r-n....cTlcc ~w IN MIN"'~ 'OTA, "","COflll''''''.
IL.LtNOIS,ICW,,-, SOUTt-l O~...OlA. )l..O..D.- ,,"'Cl"'A~"'Il'JGTON, 0' e
WR'TEP'& o'....eT Q'''" NUMeO:I1
672-3614
or COUN=CL
a....N.e.. S. 1'C1-1!:'N!!I!:"GI!:I'l
November 19, 1996
" . . .,. .~., . ,i", -t
The Honorable Jay Kimble
Mayor of Stillwater, MiDnesota ..'
'o.'.. -. ~ I,
~,.....c_ ie' ,.::<: ~~.';: '"
~_' l'~
~ ~ :t~:.;:::' ' "
~:.:--,~,...;~.~
".. oj-' -- "" ~. ......~ '.."'P,,'_
Stillwater City Council Members and Stiff'
Re: Territorial Prison Site
Dear .Mayor Kimble, Me~bers of the City Council arid CitY Staff:
. ..~ . ..
.'. {,J!.'li::.'i.' . ..'..c.... '. .
Thi5letter is 8ent as a status update regarding the prison project. Last August the City closed on
the purchase of the properly from Ma.ple Island, InC. As of that date, based upon discussions with
various lenders, we deterinined that it was necess~ Cor us to retain the services of a reputable
general contractor to provide us with solid constro.ction numbers, so that a lender could rely on
them when providing financing. ..
During the month of August and part of September, we and our architects interviewed various
reputable general contractors and selected a contractor to be part of the development team. The
contractor selected is the St. Paul d;j'-~ion of Kraus-Anderson Construction Company. . Alter they
were selected, they had Beveral meetings with our architects, so that they could have a comfort
level with the demgn of the project and create a solid construction budget. During the month of
September and October Mr. Beckwith, the assigned project manager from Kraus-Anderson
Construction Com.pany, spent many hours compiling solid numbers and meeting with the
architects. After the numbers were compiled, it was necessa:ry to go through the project very
carefully to determine what costs were included which could be revised and/or taken out or the
project. ThiB left us with solid numbers without compromising the scope of the project.
We felt that it was important for this project to have a reputable general contractor brought onto
the team early. This was done for several reasons. First, we can inform lenders and the City the
name of the contractor. Second, the contractor can give'us firm construction numbers to use with
our lender and investors. Third, the general contra.ctor can. be used to aid in the design
.e
e'
(TUE) 1 \.19' 96 17:07/ST. 16: 49jNO. 3560983060 P 3/5
...."...:..:..;
w
The Honorable Jay Kimble
Stillwater City Council
Novexnber 19, 1996
Page 2
engineering of the building 80 that the architects will. not be continuously revising their plans and
specifications based upon what the general contractor tells them. This should. provide us cost
savings in the future based upon the design. Hopefully, the numbers Kraus-Anderson
Construction Company has produced will actually co:m.e in under budget once the design
development is complete.
During the same period, we were attempting to determine whether we couJ.d utilize the space
between the first and second floor of the factory building because of the high ceilings which
CU1'tently exist in order to reduce total project cost or per room cost. I had originally thought that
maybe we could use the space for offices, meeting rooms, storage or mechaDica1. The contractor
had suggested we may need to construct a separate mechanical building. You must understand
that the cost to renovate these buildings is very high considering the fact that you need to fireproof'
and provide sprinkler syatems' for the dead space between the ceilings of the newly coostructed
roomS and the old floors of the original structure. I felt that due to the fact that the elevator
passes the space between the fir8t and second floors that maybe we couId utilize that space. I was
not confident we could put sleeping rooms in that space because there may be a problem with
egress.
After l bX"Ought the concept to Mark FinneDlann's attention, he set out to determine if we .could
utilize the space. After doing his re~earch, he informed me that we could place J.9 additional
sleeping rooms in that 6}Jace on the north side of the building without compromising the integrity
or historical aspects of the project. The 12-foot high windows on the north side of the building will
remain intact and we will in effect split them. fur egress purposes. Based upon our constro.cti.on
numbers and the significant cost of the project once it had been fully anal~ed by Mr. Beckwith
from ;Kraus-Anderson Construction Co:rnpany, it was determined that we should go forward with
attempting to add those sleeping rooms. We will be able to increase the revenues on the pl'oject
without significantly increasing the construction budget as compared to those revenues. This, of
course, was determined after we consulted with Morgan Ned,erhiser regarding the feasibility of
adding additional rooms and their impact on revenues. Mr. Nederhiser is currently in the process
of providing us with an update to our feasibility study and assures us that the additional rooms
will not nega.tively impact our rr - "!I. occupancy percentage and therefore provide us with significant
additional revenue.
e
Io. the meantime, while all the construction numbers were being processed, ete_., it was necessary
for us to get solid bids on our furniture, fixtures and equipment. We have been discussing that
with several sources md have received competitive bids. These numbers had to be continually
revised based upon the various changes to sa-ve on costs and because of the altered scope of the
project from 110 rooXII.e to 129. All of these numbers had to be factored into the cost of debt and
equity to deterntine whether there would be an appropriate return for in"estors, The tax credits
also had to be recomputed based upon the estimated final construction numbers. We have now
completed. our task regarding all the construction cost numbers and other project numbers.
We were also waiting for a. final draft of Development Agreement from Mr. Magnuson. I received
that last week. I have reviewed it and it is in the proper form. By copy of this letter to
_.,-.......:~~'"\....,.
-c' "7'~-~":,-",,::.<;:;.:&"_'>;~"'-',,,!,:! ,... ,,~,' ," ',.'_ ':-'''''''' .-.,$:0/_.. .":.
"'"._. ~:'. ,,__.".J>'"7'fl!'!'.rl!'L~i"lilllWl~i"'''l'.'' ....,......,~.. ,'.....,..,_..,.. ""..
,JIIH.., . I la~i;!,~11~~~.~4~~}~'~i~.t;i*~;~"'!~:I~!J:cl:iI'.".".' t
(TUE) 11. 19'96 17: 08/ST. 16: 49/NO. 3560983060 P 4)5....
..
:~~.
-
Tbe Honorable Jay Kimble
Stillwater City Council
November 19, 1996
Page 3
Mr. Magnuson, 1. ask that he secure the signature from the City on the execution copies and I will
sign on behalf of Territorial Coalition, Inc. In Mr. Magnuson's letter to me enclosing the
Development Agreement, he also mentioned the fact that the property needed to he surveyed and
subdivided. It was my understanding based upon my discussions with Mr. Borum that Mr. Russell
had informed Mr. Borum that the City would be handling the issues or rezoning and subdividing
the property including the survey. This could only be done after the issues with MN DOT had
been resolved. Mr. Russell has told. Mr. Borum that the issue with MN DOT is still not resolved.
The issue regarding the survey and subdivision see:ms to be an open issue which also needs to be
resolved.
Mr. BOTUm and I feel that the destination restaurant is a very significant piece of this project. It
is also our feeling that the potential lender will also view the restaurant as a major piece of the
puzzle. As a result, we have undertaken to discuss restaurant alternatives with various
individuals and entities. At this point, we are concentratilli on D'Amico & Partners to provide us
development consulting and Jnanagement of the restaurant and catering. D'Amico & Partners is
very experienced in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area as well as nationally for their creative
restaurant concepts and exquisite catering. We have had several meetings with various partners
of D'Amico & Partners, as well as a meeting with all of the partners together. They are very
excited about the project. We are providing them with all of our final numbers and space
configura.tions this week, 80 they can make a proposal to us as to how to proceed with the project.
We are very excited about the prospect of working with them and are pleased to see their
enthusiasm for our project.
'4
The only other major piece of the puzzle is a Hotel Management Contract. We have been
negotiating with Radisson and several other major hotel management companies regarding the
management of the Radisson Stillwater Hotel and Suites, but have not executed a final agreement
with any of them.. I do not believe this is a critical element, in that, a prospective lender could
have the right to a.pprove or disapprove the management company and agreement. We do not feel
it is appropriate to enter into a binding agreement at this time.
We have been told by our finance people that this is a 'Very good time to be seeking hotel financing.
That, together with the current interest rate climate is very favorable. We have been told by our
finance. ople that it may take as long as 90 days to close on financin . The holiday sea.son is also
a pro em. ow at is poln you are ng I ere it comes". We have an extremely viable
project and I know we have a December 31,1996 agreement to close on this properly, which may
still be attainable, but it is doubtful. We all felt that December 31, 1996 was a reasonable target,
but did no.: "eali~e that the construction numbers would take so much time to obtain, that M:N
POT would not be resolved and that the Development Agreement would not be signed.
Just this week we have completed a revised loan package to provide to prospective lenders which
contains all the information regarding design and costing they should require. Michael and I are
very excited regarding the final product and the proformas which have been produced based upon
solid numbers. We feel the project is very attractive to prospective lenders and investors. It'you
would like us to schedule an informational meeting with the council, possibly at one of your 4:30
e
~: :-.,.::,~ ;,.
-
.":.,~,""_':;J-, ;,: .... ,~. .~~:.. '~,' ;'
.... .'-'
. '~, }~~.,~'.::,cL~. '.'~;:.'_:
~Iio1:ota.ble Jay'I<imble .
Stillwater City Council
November 19, 1996
page 4 .
. '::;~:-'.~:~': ;'.,:.::
'" " ,"',.
. :: ,'.~'-:':. -",\.' ;,".' , .-: ~ . .
. .
. , . ~-
.,;-;'-',-,";.. .
.'. .-'.", ,', : . '. , , :'.... ',. ..~. .
meetinp, Michael and I would be happy to Jneet with you, together with Mark Finnemann from
FiJmpDaniels and Jim Beckwith from KraUSpAnderson Construction Company.
.
After you have reviewed this, if you have any q1iestiOnil, please feel free to contact :me. We look
forward to :moving to completion of our financing and bard construction to begin in the spring of
1997.
Very truly yours,
... I
LI & :K:RkMER P.A.
'I .
.I
i:.
,
'\
e
. .., , .
. '. , ','
:.',~~,i;~M~~~'.;;:j-,,;~~~~~j~M~~~;~,~i~;~.'....::.F. ..~".,~:::.~.:.;,~~~;:,;',,~~:.:~:~,~:~ '.:.;, :,.': .
e
e
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Marcy Cordes ')/J /
Administrative As/(s't:nt
Date: November 27, 1996
Re: St. Croix Valley Sports Facility - RFP Process
At the November 19 Council meeting, Council directed staff to develop a Request for Proposals
(RFP) for design and engineering services for the St. Croix Valley Sports Complex. An RFP
requesting proposals addressing conceptual design of the site and facility, and fee structures was
faxed and mailed to the firms of Ankeny Kell, Bonestroo, Delano Erickson, and Shea Architects
on Friday, November 22. Since the RFP schedule overlaps with the Thanksgiving holiday, the
design firms were given a deadline of Monday, December 2 at 9:00 a.m. for submission of
proposals.
Staff will evaluate the proposals, and submit a report with recommendations to Council on
December 2. All four firms will be scheduled to make presentations to Council during the
Tuesday, December 3 meeting, beginning at 4:00 p.m.
~~.....-_.....~>O -~~'~~"""___~~"""'---___-..~___~! "'__-"""",~~~ J;:
~q;~.7
e
e
1--
Memorandum
To:
Mayor & City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director {} -
Marcy Cordes, Administrative Assist~ I..........
December 2, 1996
From:
Date:
Re:
Review of Proposals for St. Croix Valley Sports Facility
Four proposals have been received for design services for the St. Croix Valley Sports Facility
Complex. The attached chart summarizes some of the key criteria evaluated in the submitted
proposals and compares key features and experiences of each consultant. Generally, all of the
selected firms have experience in the design of ice arenas and multi-use sports facilities. In
addition, all of the proposals submitted assume that a construction manager will be retained by
the City in order to ensure a timely completion date. Three of the four consultants have
scheduled an October 1, 1996 occupancy date. Ankeny/Kell, StefanlLarson propose a November
1 occupancy date.
All of the proposals addressed master planning concerns for the 15 acre community center site as
well as schematic design, construction drawings, and the construction management function for
the sports complex.
Two proposals include "Not to Exceed" costs for services: $ 260,000 for Erickson and $ 253,150
for Shea. The other two firms have proposed fees as a percentage of actual project costs. The
Ankeny/Kell & StefanlLarson estimate indicates a design fee of $260,000; this may ultimately be
higher or lower depending on actual construction hard costs. The Bonestroo proposal indicates a
total design fee of $292,175 - $329,875, which may also vary depending on construction hard
costs. None of the proposals include reimbursable costs in their fees.
Based on costs, the Shea proposal is the lowest at $253,150, with Del Erickson and
Ankeny/Kell/StefanlLarson a close second at $260,000, and Bonestroo at $292,175 - 329,875.
Other factors such as master planning experience, ability to meet schedules, and ability to work
with City staff and the construction manager are significant criteria for the consultant selection.
Recommendation
Staff feels that all four consultants are qualified and all could adequately provide the required
design/construction administration services. Cost of services appears to be the most significant
difference among the submitted proposals. As a result, no staff recommendation is being made
at this time.
(., ....
, -
Firm Compensation Ice Arena Experience Expected
(master plan, facility design, Occupancy
construction administration) Date
Ankeny/Kell $ 260,000 * lnver Grove Heights 11/01/96
Stefan/Larson Maplewood
Chaska
Champlin
Bonestroo $ 292,175 - 329,875 ** Woodbury 10/15/96
Apple Valley
New Hope
Delano Erickson "Not to Exceed" Maple Grove 10/15/96
$ 260,000 Edina-Braemer
Eden Prairie
Willmar Civic Ctr
Burnsville Ice Arena
Shea Architects "Not to Exceed" Plymouth 10/15/96
$ 253,150 Mankato Ice Arena
Shoreview Comm. Ctr.
* Includes fees for master planning, construction administration, and a facility design fee of 6% of
projected construction hard costs. No "Not to Exceed" price provided; however, firm is willing to
negotiate a fixed fee with the City.
** Includes fees for master planning and a facility design fee of 5.75 % of projected construction hard
costs, plus 75,400 to 113,100 for construction administration costs. No "Not to Exceed" price provided,
however, firm is willing to negotiate a fixed fee for design services only.
~
tit
...
--
e
t
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-28
November 19, 1996
SPECIAL MEETING
4:00 P.M.
The Mayor was called to order by Mayor Kimble.
Present: Councilmembers Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Absent: Councilmember Bealka (arrived at 4:30 p.m.)
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
City Engineer Eckles
Community Development Director Russell
Finance Director Deblon
Administrative Assistant Cordes
City Clerk Weldon
Press: Julie Kink.,The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
1. Consideration of Requests for Proposals AUAR (Alternative Urban Area-wide Review)
City Engineer Eckles reported proposals were received for preparation of the AUAR from
the following fIrms: 1) team of Dahlgran, Shardlowand Uban (DSU); Bonestroo Rosene
Anderlik & Associates (BRA); and Northern Environmental Technologies 2) Short
Elliott Hendrickson (SEH); and team of BR W and BARR Engineering. Each team
presented their proposals and a question and answer period followed.
Councilmember Bealka arrived at 4:30 p.m.
Recessed at 5:45 p.m. and reconvened at 5:55 p.m.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole directing staff to
work with team of Dahlgran, Shardlow and Uban (DSU), Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik &
Associates (BRA), and Northern Environmental Technologies, to develop detailed AUAR
proposal and prepare all necessary contract documents.
Ayes: Councilmembers Cummings, Thole and Mayor Kimble
Nays: Councilmembers Bealka and Zoller
(see engineer's staff report for additional action)
1
2. Financing Report - Sports Facility Complex
Finance Director Deblon introduced Ronald Langness, Springsted, Inc. He presented an
analysis of the cash flow and the adequacy of the funding of the proposed S1. Croix
Valley Sports Arena. No action necessary.
3. Consideration ofReqJ,lests for Statements of Qualifications - Sports Facility Commission
Community Development Director Russell and Administrative Assistant Cordes reported
nine SOQ's were received for design of the facility. After an initial review of the
proposals and preliminary interviews with fIrms less familiar to staff, the following fIrms
were recommended by staff as best qualifIed to provide the design services for this
facility: Ankeny, Kell Architects; Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates; Delano
Erickson Architects; and Shea Architects.
Staff further recommended an RFP be prepared for use by the four selected fIrms.
Council determined the proposal should be submitted for consideration at the December
3, 1996 meeting.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Bealka directing staff to prepare
RFP for the design of the proposed area sports facility and approving design consultants for
preparation of proposals to be presented to Council December 3, 1996.
Ayes: Councilmembers Bealka, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: Councilmembers Cummings and Thole
Recessed at 6:42 p.m.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
2
,
...
e
e
e
Ie
""
.
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-27
November 19, 1996
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kimble.
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
City Engineer Eckles
Finance Director Deblon
City Planner Fitzgerald
Assistant Finance Director Harrison
Ed Cain, Legislative Associates
City Clerk, Modi Weldon
Press: Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to approve the minutes
of October 29, 1996 Regular and Recessed Meetings. All in favor.
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Proclamation: National Adoption Month
Mayor Kimble read a proclamation declaring November to be Adoption Awareness
Month. Accepting the proclamation were Paul and Diane Anderson and their children
Kyle, Kamila, and Kasia.
2. Thomas Loome. St. Croix Valley Life Care Center
Thomas Loome explained the services provided by the St. Croix Valley Life Care Center.
He commended volunteers for their hours of dedicated service. Jennifer Allbright related
personal experiences regarding the excellent service provided to her by the Center. No
action necessary.
3
;,.....""'~''''"-'::.o';~it''',.~.-~,2.:..!.;;~'''"~--4;;..1..:-_;..;,._.....;"
OPEN FORUM
David Green, 204 Crestwood Terrace, reported the silt fencing installed by the developer
of Interlachen Third Addition had been damaged during the recent heavy rains and
expressed concerns regarding the erosion and drainage into DNR protected wetlands. He
requested a member of the Council meet with members of the neighborhood regarding
their concerns for Meadowlark Park and protection of resources.
City Engineer Eckles stated Engineering Technician Moore had been at the site today and
the developer had been contacted regarding repair of the silt fencing.
Council directed City Engineer Eckles to investigate the concerns and report back to
Council.
Update: Proposed Interstate Bridge
Mayor Kimble requested a report from Ed Cain, Legislative Associates, regarding the
proposed interstate bridge.
Ed Cain reported on meetings in Washington D.C. with with Congressional members and
staff, and with representatives of the National Park Service.
CONSENT AGENDA *
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to approve consent
agenda. All in favor.
1. Directing Payment of Bills. (Resolution No. 96-274)
2. Contractors Licenses: Dan Roettger Home Improvement (new);
George Olsen Construction Co., (Renewal)
3. Contract with Empson Archives/Balay Architects for Sabin Addition Architectural
Survey. (Resolution No. 96-275)
4. Purchase oflift station control equipment
5. Purchase of computer software - Engineering Department
6. Permanent Employment of Sharon Harrison as Assistant to the Finance Director.
(Resolution No. 96-276)
7. Permanent Employment of Dennis Pasket as Parking Enforcement Officer. (Resolution
No. 96-277)
8. Proposal requests No. 17 and 19, and A V Change Order No.2, City Hall Building
Project. (Resolution No. 96-278)
9. Purchase computer software - Finance Department
10. Purchase computer and printer - Finance Department
11. Post in-house for Labor Maintenance Worker - Parks Department
4
.,0':11; ~. .._.....i..,;:,
.
..."
e
e
e
Ie
.
12.
13.
14.
Purchase equipment for basketball and tennis court at Meadowlark Park
Applications (2) for senior citizen deferral of special assessments
1996 Labor Agreement with Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law
Enforcement Employee's Union, Local 320. (Resolution 96-279)
Rebate to Magney Construction.
Purchase of Chain Saw - Public Works/Streets.
15.
16.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider issuance of multi-family housing
revenue refunding bonds, Series 1996A, 1996B, and Series 1997. Cottages of Stillwater
Project. Notice of the hearing was published according to law.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
There were no requests to be heard.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings adopting Resolution
96-280, authorizing issuance of multi-family housing revenue refunding bonds, Series 1996A,
1996B, and Series 1997 (Cottages of Stillwater Project) contingent upon staff approval of
documents. All in favor.
Ayes: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, .Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None.
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director.
Finance Director Deblon presented a listing of various contracts and amounts paid
through October 31 for the city hall remodeling project.
2. City Engineer.
City Engineer Eckles reported the City Attorney had prepared a draft Agreement for
Construction of the NURP pond that is now being constructed by EFH on the Midwest
Spine property.
City Attorney Magnuson explained Colonial Craft had requested their portion of the
project initially be paid by the City and added to the holding costs to be charged to
Colonial Craft.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole approving
5
-"-..c ;'~~~-"i~;;;;:;!_::_::'l"~~':,-,-,,'.,_....;.....-,-.~
Agreement with Midwest Professional Properties, L.L.C., Lakeview Memorial Hospital
Association, Inc., and Donald and Aretta Rice, for construction ofNURP pond, and further
authorizing the expenditure of city funds for payment of costs related to Colonial Craft site, to be
added to Colonial Craft holding costs. All in favor.
City Engineer Eckles requested authorization to proceed with the first portion of the
scoping for the AUAR while the detailed AUAR was being prepared.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings authorizing City
Engineer to begin first portion of scoping of AUAR. All in favor.
3. City Coordinator.
City Coordinator Kriesel announced the City will be seeking applications from residents
for vacancies on boards and commissions. He stated information will be published in the
local newspapers.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update: U.S. Bench
City Planner Fitzgerald reported the HPC and city staff had negotiated an acceptable
agreement with U.S. Bench Corporation for the 1997 bench permits. She stated four
benches in the Downtown Historic area will be replaced next Spring with Victorian style
benches (donated by City of Stillwater Chamber of Commerce). Jeff Johnson, HPC,
explained there will be a total of 14 bus benches in Stillwater and permits will be
reviewed on an annual basis.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka approving 1997 U.S.
Bench Corporation permit renewal for 14 benches. All in favor.
Recessed at 8:15 p.m. and Reconvened at 8:25 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Resolution: Ordering preparation of report for 1997 Street Improvement Project
City Engineer Eckles presented the following streets as candidates for reconstruction and
rehabilitation in 1997: South First and Second Streets in the South Hill area; South Sixth and
Seventh Streets between Hancock and Willard; the Forest Hills area; and the remaining
Croixwood areas.
Council directed a feasibility study for street, sidewalk, sewer, watermain and storm
improvements be prepared for South First and Second Streets in the South Hill area.
6
t
e
--
. "
. ~
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt Resolution 96-
e 281, ordering preparation of report for 1997 Street Improvements.
Ayes: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None.
2. Refunds of sports facility donations
Finance Director Deblon reported the city had received a request from Dick Olsen, St. Croix
Valley Area Sports Facility Commission, to process refunds in excess of $4000.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole authorizing
processing of refunds for sports facility donations with the St. Croix Valley Area Sports Facility
Commission. All in favor.
3. Selection of Auditors for City, Water Board, and Relief Association
Finance Director Deblon reported the Finance Department sent out RFP's to 13 accounting
firms and received 9 proposals. The representatives of the Water Board, Fire Relief
Association, and the City recommended Larson, Allen, Weishair.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka adopting Resolution No.
96-282 approving Larsen, Allen, Weishair & Co. as auditor for the year 1996 at a price not to
exceed $21,605 for the City, Fire Relief Assoc., and Water Board.
Ayes: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to adjourn at 8:45
p.m.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
e
7
~......,.,~ ., J';'~'"~C;';';''''::;'''''>~~~~.ii..-,,-.-,:'''';'''
Resolution No. 96-274: Directing Payment of Bills.
Resolution No. 96-275: Contract with Empson ArchiveslBalay Architects for Sabin Addition
Architectural Survey
Resolution No. 96-276: Permanent Employment of Sharon Harrison as Assistant to the Finance
Director
Resolution No. 96-277: Permanent Employment of Dennis Pasket as Parking Enforcement
Officer
Resolution No. 96-278: Proposal requests No. 17 and 19, and A V Change Order No.2, City Hall
Building Project
Resolution No. 96-279: 1996 Labor Agreement with Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law
Enforcement Employee's Union, Local 320
Resolution No. 96-280: Authorizing issuance of multi-family housing revenue refunding bonds,
Series 1996A, 1996B, and Series 1997 (Cottages of Stillwater Project) contingent upon staff
approval of documents.
Resolution 96-281: ordering preparation of report for 1997 Street Improvements.
Resolution No. 96-282: approving Larsen, Allen, Weishair as auditor for the year 1996 at a
price not to exceed $21,605 for the City, Fire Relief Assoc., and Water Board.
8
, ,
~ .
e
e
Utv-UJ-~t lut 1 (;il
MN. LJGtNSED BEV A~SOC
FAX NO. 6124860786
P. 01
.
. MIDoe6;1ota 2353 MiGt Strftl . $v;l8 139 .
~ 61'--46e.Q909 . ~ -$C0<5<jS-5739 .
· . · " '0"""" '"' '''"''0'' '0"""00""0.
An As90ciaUon ofMutds, Hotel,.,. Inns. ResQrts_ B{!(J ,4;. BreilklCJst$ and OWer LodgJng FaCiliti~.<;
JOh~ F. B$rgh,;nd
e.(ec:;ti". Oir"Rcmt
SI. Paul. MN 55113
Fo>: 1l'2-~0786
TO:
Whom it May Concern
The Minnesota Association of Innkeepers (MAl) is a statewide lodging association
consisting of over 500 motels, hotels, resorts, bed & breakf~$ts and historic inns.
MAl was instrumental in passing state enabling legislation allowing for a lodging tax
at local option.
A fter extensive research ~nd a comprehensive survey MAl offers itself as a free
resource to any community considering this tax and has aSSisted communities in
implementation.
.
However, it has been and remains MAl's position that the lodging tax issue should
only move forward if the lodging community, the group to be taxed.. is in essential
agreement. If they are, as a local business community, not in agreement the issue
should not proceed for a variety of reasons including a diminished chance for success
In overall tourism promotion. Such a division is not In a community's best interest in
regards to future marketing and promotion. ,
Anyone needing further information on the lodging tax need only contact our office.
Very truly yours,
John F. Berglund
Executive Director
JFB/wt
.
CHA:RMAN
Gary o.iCk
PReSIDENT
Mtrei4 00"
,IFlST ViCE PRESiDENT
!arO Ai~
S::CQNO ViCE PRESiOENT
G(:n(l.A,ck.drl"l"l4W'\
SECRETARY
6""hI.>
-REASUREP
r.,., 1!l41~'<Xl
.
.
.
~. ~., :~1~\~isF~--':?~.~:~~( .:'.'.::-~'--_..
I ~~ HHaJt~~.n nlla ~~~\i~j"rrl j i"vn.~~ 111H:M:r;:'j~1~ IH)J't
Alf~ilJi~UlJrJl,~h A~c,~~,~A(ll{,;li/;'~ Ij,., I L"~,il.!l.~' l'l),:iJJ.l D
,jqfhl j'. 1!(;tqHII::(
.""l.i:..."t,.",-? I);"....... \
~~~i:.;3 :'fI..I,~ ~:;k;f.~\ .'J ~;')t,it~~ 1:~SI \; ..~c ~:'a'_JI. .V1N :)', j I
ti'J? ,"'~:j 1):/0," 11'1 ., '.!CJ}-.;','j:Hj/:i:~ .~ Ln; ,ir,'..UJ.... j';,/,\
;:'.}llM):;U'( lip: "lINt~t.:';.t)"I\ MI','r~'1 ,fJ;..'.;,~ql.""I.H
1\11 l}8S0l:i:ltil}lIl,1(lY!tJW/8. (Jotal/;. IilW>., N.(.'~lIrt;;. N.:t) ,I.( '~l'ml,i{J':I:;/.': Hili/I' Win,' 1,11"/.'111:'; :< 1('iJii:If):~
iC) .
'Nhom I J. i'Ilny COllt::}t( I
1':1(: IVllf1fl(~S()ji"1 /\::ll.l(ll;iiH:iofl of Innknl!l)un-; (MAl) i!; i.:t Sli.ltt.lWIC'ln lod'l!ll'j n:.i;,t)f;t:.li:UJ[1
t.nn"il~;j:itl8 '."11' over bOO f'lI.li,uk, Iloi:~h, (C.!',l.lll:::, bnd }l,I)(1)i.l}~i.J'.:.; 'I; ..Iipf ;w;i'o:'l,; HI! );;
tVI ;.\1 W,J~:; ill:li:nml<llli>ll in pu~';::,ifl!~ :-;l;l tn (:mablill~J 1()f.'W~1li':lr.i()(\ <.lilo iiI/ii lq 10 r ,I "/c"I."PII<! : < I:
;..~i: IC.\I:.,II Ur',UOIl.,
/\ i'i..!r;,~Xi:un:,(vc) w:m;.'li'ch (llld ;1 (:o[rlj)rl.d.li:ll:W,'I: <;IIr'Vt)V iVl/\1 IYi.i'(~('..' ! i:.;:'1 i ,.I'.': II;
ft)...,f)lli'Cl.:tO ;JIlV (;O(tlnlulllty ..-;OII::;ldoi'inn till:'; i.ii:"'; ;)nd hd:; -):;:W.;::I!d Cillil((\lllllti,):; I,:
;rnt\!<!lIW, 1 iiliV)lj
Ilc..IW,)V,)i', it h:)::> tll,:(HI iJl\i'i r"""rtuin:; 1V1^1'~:; 1)1):~ii:l()11 Ul;::li; t,110 l<)d~.!illH i,d,: l:j,Hlh :';1111111..'
(lid,! mO\f;" i'O(\Nilr'c} if dIe lo..;.Iqillq COflHl'tI.lf!iiV,i:iH; (ji'nuj) iLl bc: i:;I;,::<.I, 1:., III :::::;::;111'1'
;jl~1J(.:,:11IH{\i.. It tl"l(lY .If(;, ;'l~; ;;1 1{)I,;;.t1 tH!:WW:;':; IlOTlHillnd'v, 1\01. iii :1t!(:.l:;TY!-!lli' i.(i:: I~.::II'
~;hl)\.i1d nol.. ~)U)(:I'!od fd( d \f ,\rHny (,f 10<1:.;01'1'.; ii"ldildlll(l d d.illlll'i1:;ll: ~(l 1.:\ kit,,:, II) ,\)':';'~"
1111)'I,;i.dl i,)Ilrj'.illl !.Ilt)1110tll)IL :.;I.t{;/I u rhvi:':illll i:'.; /loi; 1\'1 ;:~ f;tHlll'rlllflli:y':; lH::.i !in:'I.:~ .i il;
(i)I]'..lrd:,; i!l Ilflllrn 1"'kll.kuUnq .11.)1'/ PIlH'Iloi.I!.ltj.
.'\nlfOlll.! lH~n<:Hnq "iI(th;.l( IIlf()r\"t"kll:ll.llIOl) i:h~J k>d~~ill~"J i.d)'IH!!,~11 Imlv ':(),li.:H,1 \It:i' ..);!i, i'
V,4;I" i.ndV "111)\.11:;
,.., ~ I ,
//' /i /I,oj . ( /::?
/./ i/ I \ f/'
... </\.:~./' .j : ..... )1-,/../
/1',}jll,[!I" ql)ltJillllli .1
;Xi!l :ili.lv': f )il"\,i';i;i d
, 'i
/
I
,/
"/"
I
/' J: ;';/\tVI:
I.
/.
I J
1/
I'
i
,:1 ('\I:ir/.'\(l
t;;.,.,'(I'.,.,1....
;)n:;:~II'J~:t\l r
M.'tl'r,'.:\(,:",lij'
j':!; i:\r "h~i." 1 ~l~: .rjU)f '1\1 r
l~.~l) .'\l:d"~"~,'l
}ii ~(:,)I"ll VI',;: : ~ll :~~l'n:", (
";: :r~: t: ; '.....~{'i
'fit:.",:) j ;
{~,;, ~~ l l\t:k/~r, i\ I "
:~Ii :1,."
OJ',,',,;,.;,."
I.t; I
H\IJJjU\I~I\; l~! 'mi Xl),!
~.Il.)~';;.;V ~1:1l1 (U::;~IJ.ll
[1,:':11, NIb! iiti<!.!!:
'N~,I
.
.
: l
.
November 30, 1996
Mayor Jay Kimble
Councilman Terry Zoller
Councilman Eric Thole
Councilman Rich Cummings
Councilman Taco Bealka
Gentlemen:
We have just recently become aware of an effort in the community to present to the city
council a request to implement a lodging tax on selected lodging operators in
Stillwater. There are several key pieces of information we wish for you to consider.
1. A majority of the Ibdging operators in Stillwater oppose implementing
a lodging tax. Since the tax is discriminatory by nature, it has been adopted only in
communities with broad support of the lodging operators. This is not the case in
Stillwater. .
2. The City Council has voted to exempt downtown lodging from a
lodging tax. This commitment to downtown lodging operators about three years ago
was based on sound public policy and would now be awkward to reverse. This
exemption cuts the revenue from this tax approximately in half.
3. The revenue from this tax, by law, must be used exclusively for the
promotion of tourism in Stillwater. After the 5% administration fee, no money
can be used for capital improvements or other civic purposes. The proceeds will be
administered by an independent board that must purchase advertising, send out
brochures, and the like.
4. There will be insufficient revenue to make a difference. On a budget of
$50,000 there is enough money to hire a CVB manager and secretary, and maybe pay
the rent. There is no money left Ule for the phones, the heat, the copy machine, the fax,
the computer, or any of the support required to run an office. And all of this is before
the first brochure is ever designed and printed, before the first stamp is ever bought, or
the first advertisement ever paid for. The money raised would serve no public purpose
except to provide employment for people with nothing to de and no way to do it.
5. We don't need yet another organization to promote tourism. Both
chambers of commerce promote tourism. The Stillwater Bed & Breakfast Association
also promoted tourism last year with over $30,000 in advertising. Stillwater is already
actively and heavily promoted by private interests.
6. There is inadequa.te information to make a decision. There has been no
financial impact study done to estimate revenue, no budget created to detail
expenditures, no staffing estimates, no estimates of the positive effects on tile
,
.
t
.
-
November 3D, 1996
Mayor Jay Kimble
Councilman Terry Zoller
Councilman Eric Thole
Councilman Rich Cummings
Councilman Taco Bealka
Gentlemen:
We have just recently become aware of an effort in the community to present to the city
council a request to implement a lodging tax on selected lodging operators in
Stillwater. There are several key pieces of information we wish for you to consider.
1. A majority of the lodging operators In Stillwater oppose Implementing
a lodging tax. Since the tax is discriminatory by nature, it has been adopted only in
communities with broad support of the lodging operators.
2. The City Council has voted to exempt downtown lodging from a
lodging tax. This commitment to downtown lodging operators about three years ago
was based on sound public policy and would now be awkward to reverse. This
exemption cuts the revenue from this tax approximately in half.
3. The revenue from this tax, by law, must be used exclusively for the
promotion of tourism In Stillwater. After the 5% administration fee, no money
can be used for capital improvements or other civic purposes. The proceeds will be
administered by an independent board that must purchase advertising, send out
brochures, and the like.
4. There will be Insufficient revenue to make a difference. On a budget of
$50,000 there is enough money to hire a CVB manager and secretary, and maybe pay
the rent. There is no money left the for the phones, the heat, the copy machine, the fax,
the computer, or any of the support required to run an office. And all of this is before
the first brochure is ever designed and printed, before ~arrw~er bought, or
the first advertisement ever paid for. The money raise e serve 0 public
purpose except provide employment for people with nothing to ~and ~ w"' to do it.
5. We don't need yet another organization to promote tourism. Both
chambers of commerce promote tourism. The Stillwater Bed & Breakfast Association
also promoted tourism last year with over ~ in advertising. Stillwater is already
actively and heavily promoted by private intere~s. 0i70
6. There Is Inadequate Information to make a decision. There has been no
financial impact study done to estimate revenue, no budget created to detail
expenditures, no staffing estimates, no estimates of the positive effects on the
community by spending the money, no estimates of the negative impact on the lodging
,
t.
.
'.
<t
..
community by spending the money, no estimates of the negative impact on the lodging
operators by imposing the tax. Taxes are serious business and should be enacted
only after thorough study.
7. Taxes are permanent, but this is an unproven concept. Ideas come and
go, markets change, people change, but this tax is permanent. Several communities,
after an initial rush of enthusiasm, have removed their lodging tax as noncompetitieve
and ineffective.
8. The tax falls unfairly upon the bed & breakfast operations. These are
classic mom & pop operations that invest more than all of their profits into the housing
stock of Stillwater. They have been good for Stillwater's historic preservation, good for
Stillwater's neighborhoods, good for Stillwater's tourism. They already do their share
to promote tourism in Stillwater. To now selectively tax them over their objection
would create questionable public policy.
Lodging is a significant industry in Stillwater. Our combined employment makes us
one of the top five employers in the city. Before the city considers a lodging tax,
serious discussion and analysis should take place.
If you have any question regarding the issue, please contact any of us. We would be
happy to discuss this further.
The Ann Bean House
The Elephant Walk
The Harvest Inn
The James Mulvey Residence Inn
The Lady Goodwood
The Laurel Street Inn
The Lowell Inn
The Lumber Baron Hotel
4-~(b~
7h ;/ell?/ooJlV\. .:rNN
The William Sauntry Mansion
.
.
.
~
,...
...
community by spending the money, no estimates of the negative impact on the lodging
operators by imposing the tax. Taxes are serious business and should be enacted
only after thorough study.
7. Taxes are permanent, but this is an unproven concept. Ideas come and
go, markets change, people change, but this tax is permanent Several communities,
after an initial rush of enthusiasm, have removed their lodging tax as noncompetitieve
and ineffective,
8. The tax falls unfairly upon the bed & breakfast operations. These are
classic mom & pop operations that invest more than all of their profits into the housing
stock of Stillwater. They have been good for Stillwater's historic preservation, good for
Stillwater's neighborhoods, good for Stillwater's tourism. They already do their share
to promote tourism in Stillwater. To now selectively tax them over their objection
would create questionable pubric policy.
Lodging is a significant industry in Stillwater. Our combined employment makes us
one of the top five employers in the city. Before the city considers a lodging tax,
serious discussion and analysis should take place.
If you have any question regarding the issue, please contact any of us. We would be
happy to discuss this further.
. ~~,~~',\Jk~
Tile Ann Bean H use
.1/ Ii? I
_~/i(// /~~'::C-j~~~'_~'6/~_
The vest Inn
J};J~ ~;fc{~ lcJ~~ ~
Trle Eleprlant Walk
~~
-' L- C1u0~.
Th ames Mul ey Resid~nce Inn
~.~_D~. .--
T,ne Lady Goodwood
~V~ ~.uL
---:-~
The Lowell Inn
~.i~ j V vY/~J
n;t;ru~
---'L~ ~~<
(~~--
The William Sauntry Mansion
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION 96-283
e Ameridata Service Call 44.00
Ancom Portable Radio Battery 84.88
Brekke, Thomas and Barbara Refund Ice Arena Donation 210.00
Burt, Timothy and Rosemary Refund Ice Arena Donation 100.00
Croix Oil Company Oil 202.59
Deblon, Diane Health Insurance 377.19
Desch, Mark and Gloria Parking Lease and Maintenance 742.30
Halligan, Joseph Refund Ice Arena Donation 365.00
Jansens Cleaning Service Maintenance Agreement 1,097.07
Jerome, Kim and Cort Refund Ice Arena Donation 1,095.00
Johnson, Gary and Robin Refund Ice Arena Donation 100.00
Johnson, Mitchell and Amy Refund Ice Arena Donation 550.00
LMC Insurance Trust Deductible 2,500.00
Loeffler, Mark Refund Ice Arena Donation 300.00
Magnuson, David Legal Services 7,312.08
Miller, Douglas and Mary Refund Ice Arena Donation 200.00
Schaefer, Patrick and Carol Refund Ice Arena Donation 365.00
Schwab, Robert and Debra Refund Ice Arena Donation 50.00
Short Elliott Hendrickson Annexation Trunk Facilities 5,089.77
Simmons, William Refund Ice Arena Donation 365.00
Solheid, John and Dawn Refund Ice Arena Donation 160.00
Viking Office Products Misc. Office Supplies 62.25
Wagner, Michael Refund Ice Arena Donation 333.00
Washington County. Shared Equipment Project 875.00
Wash. Co. SWCD Lily Lake Monitoring 260.00
Wicklander-Zulawski and Assoc. Criminal Interviews 349.00
MAt'JUALS NOVEMBER 1996
Blue CrosslBlue Shield Premiums 6,450.00
MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax/Use Tax 301.00
MN Society of CPA's Conference 130.00
Robinson, Maree Property Purchase 10,750.00
U.S. Postmaster Postage - Meter 1,000.00
Washington County Real Estate Taxes 6.00
ADDENDUM
Action Rental Rent Log Splitter 35.00
Aggregate Ready-Mix Concrete Refresher 50.00
AirTouch Cellular Cellular Phones 40.83
Aspen Mills Uniforms 108.64
AT&T Wireless Cellular Phones 203.97
B.E.B. Print Wheel 44.73
Camas Sand for Streets 348.68
e Capitol Communications Radio Repair 134.55
Cargill Salt Deicing Salt 955.42
CCP Industries Towels for Shop 111 .34
Chemsearch Tire Guard/Seal Pump 492.00
Coordinated Business Systems Copier Maintenance 112.98
Cutler, Jeffrey Modem, Switch Box, Cable 170.36
-~-_..~'''.,..
DAC Industires Cleaning Supplies
D. J.s Municipal Supply ShovelslHammer/Chain
Ecolab Pest Control
Fireguard Sprinklers NST Caps
- Rank1iffQuest Planner Refill
Fuhr Trenching \ Good Samaritan Storm Sewer
Glaser, Paul Boiler Engineer
Grafix Shoppe Graphics for Squad
Johnson, Ron Supplies
Kangaroo Self Storage Storage Space Rental
Kimball Midwest Tape
Kimble, Jay Travel Expenses
Lakeview Hospital Manitoux testing
Legislative Associates Retainer/Services
Lind, Gladys Land Purchase
Metropolitan Council November SAC
MN DOT Agreement - Lights
MN Valley Landscape Trees and Shrubs
Motorola Service Agreement
Ness, George Book Tabs/Outlets
Northshore Compressors Air Test
Northwestern Tire Valve Repair
NSP GaslElectric
Park Nursery Bulbs
Petty Cash Coffee .
Safety-Kleen Remove Paint Barrel
Secom Car lock opener
Service Environmental Dump Site Evaluation
Shaw Lumber Snow fence and posts
Shorty's Laundry
Simonets Furniture
St. Croix Office Supplies Office Supplies
T .A. Shifsky Asphalt
UBC Wood
Viking Office Supplies
Ward, Diane Mileage
Washington County McKusick Road Project
Washington County Refund BCWMO Grant
Washington Co. Information Svcs. Consultant Services
Total Due.
Adopted by the City Council this 3rd Day of December, 1996.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
265.66
283.68
218.33
175.00
48.78
1,028.59
200.00
159.43
85.80
176.00
26.23
1,361.62
30.00
4,695.00
927.00
4,059.00
39.13
15,075.00
204.52
23.39
89.46
182.64
4,448.63
27.10
60.61
475.00
62.31
2,095.47
607.24
118.94
2,000.00
74.36
43.12
249.30
95.10
9.90
30,934.63
8,000.00
231 .13
123,521.73
e
e,
I
~... , I
RESOLUTION NO. 96-284
e
APPROVING RENEWALS OF ON-SALE, OFF-SALE, WINE,
SUNDAY ON-SALE, ON-SALE 3.2%, OFF-SALE 3.2%
LIQUOR LICENSES AND TOBACCO LICENSES
FOR 1997
WHEREAS, requests for renewals have been requested by the following; and
WHEREAS, all required forms have been submitted and investigations completed;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota,
hereby approves the renewals of the businesses listed below for On-sale, Off-sale, Wine,
Sunday On-Sale, On-Sale 3.2 %, Off-Sale 3.2% Liquor Licenses and Tobacco Licenses
for 1997.
EKS, INC.
dba Harbor Bar
LICENSE
Tobacco - CG97-1
Club On-Sale Liquor - CI97-1
Tobacco - CG97-3
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-1
S97-1
Tobacco - CG97-4
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-2
S97-2
Tobacco - CG-97-5
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-3
S97-3
Tobacco - CG97-6
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-4
S97-4
Wine - W97-1
Tobacco - CG97-26
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-5
S97-5
Tobacco - CG97-7
Off-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3F97-1
Tobacco - CG97-8
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197 -6
S97-6
Tobacco - CG97-10
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-7
S97-7
BUSINESS NAME
American Legion
Brine's
St. Croix Club Bar & Restaurant
dba Canelake's
St. Croix Caterers
dba Cat Ballou's
Cub Foods
Dock CafeCorp.
dba Dock Cafe
The Elephant Walk
Erickson Post Acquistion, Inc.
dba Sprint Gas and Groceries
National Restaurants, Inc.
dba Esteban's of Stillwater
Food-n-Fuel
e
Freighthouse, Inc.
dba Freighthouse
"."#1;: .,
.....,...:.,<"."""',... --'-..._.._,....~-~~~..,.,..
~ , ,.,
LaRecolte, Inc. Wine with Strong Beer Option -
dba Harvest Restaurant and Inn WSB97-1
3.2 On-Sale - 3N97-1
Jazzy's House of Blues and Cigar Parlor Tobacco - CG97 -11 e
JLH, Inc. Tobacco - CG97-12
dba John's Bar Off-Sale Liquor - IF97-1
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-8
S97-8
Kinsel's Inc. Tobacco - CG97-13
dba Kinsel's Liquor Store Off-Sale Liquor - IF97-2
Knights of Columbus Club On-Sale Liquor - 97-3
Lens Family Foods Tobacco - CG97-2
Loggers Tobacco - CG97-14
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor 197 -9
S97-9
The Lowell Inn On-Sale and Sunday Liquor- 197-10
S97-10
St. Croix Preservation Co. Inc. On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-11
dba Lumber Baron's Hotel 897-11
Mad Capper Saloon and Eatery Inc. Tobacco - CG97-16
dba Mad Capper On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-12
S97-12
FTL Corporation Tobacco - CG97-18
dba MGM Liquor Warehouse Off-sale - IF97-3
Meister's Bar and Grill Tobacco - CG97-17
On-Sale Liquor - 197-13
Oak Glen Limited Ptnrshp. On-Sale and Sunday Liquor - 197-13
dba Oak Glen Country Club S97-14
Stillwater River Inn, Inc. Tobacco - CG97-22
dba P.O. Pappy's On-Sale and Sunday Liquor- 197-14
S97-15
R & R Liquor Tobacco - CG97-23
Off-Sale Liquor - IF97-4
River Oasis Tobacco - CG97-24
Rivertown Inn Wine - W97-2
Savories LLC Wine with Strong Beer Option - e
WSB097-2 3.2 On-Sale - 3N97-2
Silver Lake Restaurant Wine - W97-3
On-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3N97-3
..... "'-k...'. .~""'.--'....._....~...........-.....:......:...-,""..';...:. _.....' -.i. ,._,.,,;.,:.;,;.._ ""....j:.~....:-.:..~,,_j_~_:..~:::"
I:
...... , ,
South Hill Liquor
Tobacco - CG97-25
Off Sale Liquor - IF97-5
e
St. Croix Drug Company
Tobacco - CG97-27
Stillwater Country Club, Inc.
Tobacco - CG97-29
Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor
C197-4 CS97-3
Stillwater Grill
Wine - W97-4
On-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3N97-4
BPOE Lodge 179
dba Stillwater Lodge
Club On-Sale and Sunday Liquor
C197-2 CS97-4
Sutler's, Inc.
dba Sutler's Wine and Spirits
Off-Sale Liquor - IF97-6
Tobacco - CG97-31
St. Croix Catering, Inc.
dba The Grand
Wine w/Strong Beer Option -
WSB097-3 On-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3N97-4
Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc.
Tom Thumb Store No. 219
Tobacco - CG97-33
Off-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3F97-5
Zahren Enterprises, Inc.
dba Trumps Deluxe Grill and Bar
Tobacco - CG97-34
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor
197-15 S97-16
Twin Cities Stores, Inc.
dba Oasis Market (Croixwood)
Tobacco - CG97-20
Off-sale 3.2 beer - 3F97-2
Twin Cities Stores (Greeley St.)
dba Oasis Market
Tobacco - CG97-21
Off-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3F97-3
Twin Cities Stores (Main St.)
dba Oasis Market
Tobacco - CG97-19
Off-Sale 3.2 Beer - 3F97-4
Vittorio's, Inc.
Tobacco - CG97-35
Off-Sale Liquor - IF97-7
On-Sale and Sunday Liquor 197 -16
S97-17
Adopted by Council this 3rd day of December, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
e
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
".."""""""-~~~.......,.....~-.-,.----,~~
",."..
0" ...
e
e
CITY OF STILLWATER
Memorandum
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
Date:
November 27, 1996
Subject:
1997 Liquor and Tobacco License Renewals
All holders of existing liquor licenses and tobacco licenses have been mailed renewal forms;
however, not all renewal applications have been returned at this time. A final listing will be
provided Council at the December 3 meeting.
Action Recommended:
Resolution approving liquor and tobacco license renewals for 1997, contingent upon receipt of
all required documentation, fees, and police investigation approval.
,--:~,':,",'~~:,~.~-;:!~:.!",-:',,,,,,,,-'r~,:::.""'.>>;:.~-, ,.'. '---':'(~~;:::;{~:~'<,,:~'
~
, ...
No.
96-55
$40.00
GENERAL CORPORATE LICENSE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
City of Stillwater
County of Washington
-
WHEREAS, Kingwood Management has paid the sum of Forty and 00/1 ODs Dollars to the Treasurer
of said City as required by the Ordinances of said City and complied with all the requirements of said
Ordinances necessary for obtaining this licenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the City Council, and by virtue hereot the said Kingwood
Management, PO Box 2010 14524 61st Street Court North Stillwater MN 55082 is hereby licensed and
authorized to General Contractor for the period of one year starting October 31, 1996 and ending October
31, 1997 subject to all the conditions and provisions of said Ordinances.
Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the City of Stillwater this 3rd day of December A.D.
1996.
Attest:
Mayor:
/~
No.
96-56
$40.00
GENERAL CORPORATE LICENSE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
City of Stillwater
County of Washington
WHEREAS, Heikes Tree Service has paid the sum of Forty and 00/100s Dollars to the Treasurer
of said City as required by the Ordinances of said City and complied with all the requirements of said
Ordinances necessary for obtaining this licenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the City Council, and by virtue hereot the said Heikes Tree
Service 20487 Olinda Trail, MarineMN 55047 is hereby licensed and authorized to Tree Trimmingfor the
period of one year starting September 27, 1996 and ending September 27, 1997 subject to all the conditions
and provisions of said Ordinances.
Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the City of Stillwater this 3rd day of December
A.D. 1996.
Attest:
Mayor:
e
e
e
...
CITY OF STILLWATER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
,) .:; /
FROM: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer r- ....
DATE: November 26,1996
SUBJECT: Commencement of Hiring Process for Civil Engineer
DISCUSSION
The 1997 budget includes the hiring of a in-house Civil Engineer. This position is necessary to
increase in-house engineering capabilities. The development of the annexation area is creating a
tremendous increase in staff responsibilities and the need for completion and review of studies
and analysis, therefore, staff desires to fill this new position as soon as possible.
Staff requests council approval to commence the hiring process for a new in-house Civil
Engineer. It is anticipated that this position will have a net positive impact in the city's budget.
All of the time this person spends working on projects will be charged against the projects or the
developers for completing new projects within the city.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council authorize commencement of the hiring process, including writing job
descriptions, posting in-house and advertising for this position prior to the new year.
~tr,~
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTMENT Engineering/Publ ic Works MEETING DATE 12/3/96
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Upgrade of Auto Cad Software
FINANCIAL IMPACT tBriefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
--.....
-
$450.00. olus tax
This item can be charged to the Sewpr Fund
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
NO-----L-
YES
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST IlliMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A
MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO TIIE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBMITTED BY
Klayton Eckles
DATE 11/26/96
~
.e
e
...
tt PURCHASE REQUEST FORMS
I.
Department: Engineering/Public Works
Item: Upgrade of Auto Cad Software
From: Cad Carn Engineering
Pnce: $450.00 plus tax
Notes: This item can be charged to the Sewer Fund.
CITY OF STILLWATER
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer \<..f /
DATE: November 26, 1996
SUBJECT: Final Payment for Good Samaritan Center
DISCUSSION
Attached is a Application for Final Payment from Fuhr Trenching. This project has been
satisfactorily completed. Final payment amount is $1,028.59. All work was completed by Fuhr
Trenching so there are no Lien Waivers required. .
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council pass a resolution authorizing final payment to Fuhr Trenching in the
amount of$1,028.59 for the Stillwater Good Samaritan Center Storm Sewer and Drainage
Improvements.
e
.. ..
APPLlCTATION FINAL
- APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CONTRACTOR: FUHR TRENCHING
UNIT PRICE SCHEDULE CONTRACT AMOUNT: $14,021.80
CITY OF STILLWATER APPLICATION DATE: 11/20/96
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER PERIOD ENDING: 11120/96
STORM SEWER & DRAINAGE FACILITIES
TOTAL
UNIT EST.
NO. ITEM UNIT QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 MOBILATION LUMP SU 1 $1.500.00 $1 ,500.00
2 TOPSOIL BORROW C. Y. 17 $10.00 $170.00
3 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. 48 $8.00 $384.00
4 REMOVE 18" CMP CULVERT L. F. 22 $5.00 $110.00
5 AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 TON 75 $8.20 $615.00
6 INSTALL B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER L. F. 0 $17.50 $0.00
7 TYPE 41A WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 28 $41.00 $1.148.00
8 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL. 8 $3.00 $24.00
9 12" PVC PIPE SEWER L. F. 262 $26.65 $6,982.30 .
10 12" PVC FLARED END SECTION EACH 1 $200.00 $200.00
11 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE TYPE A L. F. 9 $120.00 $1.080.00
12 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCT., DESIGN X L. F. 3 $170.00 $510.00
13 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1792-GL EACH 1 $250.00 $250.00
14 CASTING ASSEMBLY R-1730 EACH 1 $200.00 $200.00
15 SODDING S.Y. 345 $2.30 $793.50
16 SEEDING ACRE 0.1 $500.00 $50.00
TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED $14.016.80
LESS 5% RETAINAGE $0.00
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $14,016.80
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS $12.988.21
AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION $1 ,028.59
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
THE UNDERSIGNED CONTRACTOR HEREBY SWEARS UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT (1) ALL PREVIOUS
PROGRESS PAYMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE OWNER ON ACCOUNT OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE CONTRACT
REFERRED TO ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPLIED BY THE UNDERSIGNED TO DISHARGE IN FULL ALL OBLIGATIONS OF
THE UNDERSIGNED INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH WORK COVERED BY PRIOR APPLICATIONS FOR PAYMENT
UNDER SAID CONTRACT. AND (2) ALL MATERIALS AND EaUIPTMENT INCORPATED IN SAID PROJECT OR OTHERWISE
LISTED IN OR COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ARE F ALL LIENS. CLAIMS,
SECURITY INTERESTS AND ENCUMBRANCES.
DATED: '-"\._:2.(:)- C\fo -::j-~
(CONTRACTOR)
~"'-r- '~-c..~~ O~~
. (NAME AND TITLE)
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT, THE UNDERSIGNED APPROVES PAYMENT E CO RACTOR OF THE AMOUNT DUE.
Ie
DATE:
/1... '2,S~6
BY:
.. ...
RESOLUTION 96-285
ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT, L.I. 317
GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
-
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on October 3, 1995,
Fuhr Trenching of Hugo, Minnesota, has satisfactorily completed the improvement of Good
Samaritan Center storm sewer and drainage in accordance with such contract,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER,
MINNESOTA. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved,
and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the city clerk and mayor are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in
full.
Adopted by the Council, this 3rd day of December, 1996.
MAYOR
Attest:
CITY CLERK
e'
~
MEMO
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL V\ ~
e FROM: DIANE DEBLON, FINANCE DIRECTOR ~
DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 1996
SUBJECT: TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING
Tonight we are required to hold the truth in taxation public hearing
and take public comment. If additional time is needed, the meeting may
be continued to Wednesday, December 11. If the December 11 meeting is
not needed, the council can adopt the Final 1997 Budget and Final 1997
Tax Levy at your next scheduled meeting on December 17. (We are not
allowed to adopt the tax levy or budget tonight.)
Attached are copies of the information to be presented at the Truth
in Taxation public hearing.
-
.,..~~.-
1997 BUDGET
The City of Stillwater provides a wide range of services including:
Police & Fire protection, Inspection, Planning, Streets maintenance,
~Engineering, Signs & lighting, Elections, Administration, Finance, Lily
,.,Lake, Library, Parks, Sanitray sewer, Storm sewer and Solid waste. The
majority of revenue to support these programs comes from property taxes,
state aid and user fees.
The city begins the budget process in June for the following year.
Department heads submit their budget worksheets and requests for programs
by the end of June to the Finance department. The Finance department
then compiles all the requests and makes revenue projections for the next
budget year. Salary & benefit projections are calculated by the Finance
department and are based on the various union contracts.
The general fund, library fund, parks fund, sewer fund, storm sewer
fund, solid waste fund, parking fund & lily lake fund are all budgeted.
In addi t ion, the ci ty budgets for the outs tanding debt service and
general obligation bonds of the city. The detailed budget document is
printed and distributed to council and staff for use in the budget
process. The entire budget booklet is a line-item budget of almost 300
.pages.
The next step in the budget process is for each department head to
meet with and discuss their specific requests at a council workshop.
Council is informed of the programs for the department and the
corresponding budget request to implement those programs. From this
point, the council may make adjustments or changes based on the council's
priority of programs. After which, there are recommended cuts and/or
changes to reduce expenditures to ~he level of revenue projected.
The total revenues are highly dependent on HACA (Homestead credit
from the state), LGA (Local Government Aid from the state), and property
taxes, since these are the three largest sources of revenue. The State
of MN determines how much HACA & LGA the city receives and the city
determines the amount of the property taxes. This year, the mandate from
the city council was to have a property tax rate no higher than last
year, and preferably lower than 1996. This was accomplished wi th a
proposed tax levy of $3,941,109 and a corresponding proposed tax capacity
rate of 34.610% for 1997.
e
City of Stillwater
\1996 Tax Rate & 1997 Proposed Tax Ratel
36.0%
35.5%
1996 Tax Rate (35.294%)
Q)
'tU
0:: 35.0%
~
1997 Proposed Tax Rate (34.610%)
,34.5%
34.0%
e
. -.. . ".,.....,.....'~.',~ .."..,.~~..'..'.;,~""".;..~".. -. ""l" :.~.~ <:>0: ::,~ ';;::.-~.:", :,",:.';:, ,;~ ,.... .
, . "_ -'~'.ff":~':,:..,.
.- . -..' --~...,.._-,..,~-.,..
::;"'.... .." :- -.. ~-':-..~ ...... '~
City of Stillwater
Proposed Tax Rates for Taxes Payable in 1997
Each dollar you pay is distributed this way:
34.610% City of Stillwater
25.411 % County
5.872% Other Districts
61.378% School District
Proposed Rates:
City of Stillwater
County
School District
Other Districts
34.610%
25.411%
61.378%
5.872%
e
Total: 127.271%
e
City of Stillwater
How will your Tax Bill be spent?
1997 Proposed Tax Levy
Taxable Market Value of Residential Homestead
75000 100000 125000 150000
$166.05 $272.49 $378.93 $485.37
$103.91 $170.52 $237.13 $303.74
Total $269.96 $443.01 $616.06 $789.11
e
City of Stillwater
\1997 Proposed Operating Revenue* I
(37.6%) Intergovernmental
(11.2%) Service Fees
(1.7%) Miscellaneous
(2.2%) Fines & Forfeits
(4.4%) Licenses/Permits
(2.2%) Interest
(40.7%) Property Taxes
Revenue Type
Interest
Licenses/Permits
Fines & Forfeits
Miscellaneous
Intergovernmental
Service Fees
Property Taxes
Total:
Ie
Amount
$131,000
$262,130
$130,000
$99,150
$2,238,525
$667,076
$2,423,816
$5.951.697
*(General Fund, DARE. Library, Special Events & Parks Fund-Excluding Bonded Capital Outlay)
City of Stillwater
11997 Proposed Operating Expenditures. I
(42.3%) Public Safety
(19.2%) General Government
(18.1%) Culture & Recreation
(18.6%) Streets and Engineering
Mayor and City Council $137,005 City Engineer $262,248
Elections $1,910 Streets $538,979
Finance $359,349 Shop $122,525
Administration $381,186 Signs & Lighting $190,500
City Attorney $188,868 Streets and Engineering $1,114,252
Plant/City Hall $82,250
General Government $1,150,568 Unallocated $84,000
Solid Waste $21,500
Police $1,520,258 Unallocated $105,500
Fire $665,493
Inspection $152,474 Special Events $20,000
Civil Defense $946 Library $653,200
Planning $185,017 Parks $410,489
DARE $3,000 Culture & Recreation $1,083,689
Public Safety $2,527,188
- GRAND TOTAL $5.981.197
* (General Fund, DARE, Library, Special Events, & Parks Fund - Excluding Bonded Capital Outlay)
..^";~'. :~"!l'"'' _r':' ~,r',;1'l'Ili""*""'4^,'",-<
199 5-1997 19S6-1997
GENERAL FUND 1995 1996 1997 Budaet $ Increas (Decrease) % Incree se (Decrease)
MuaJ Budam Beaue~~d .Recommended ~Anlle.....ti ~~~ R.~~ ~Qffime.!ld.e.d ~ts on 1997 Recommendations
Mayor and Council
Personnel 48,028 48,647 50,207 50,207 1,560 1,560 3.21% 3.21%
Services & Charges 59,836 51,590 65,298 65,298 13,708 13,708 26.57% 26.57% $12,000 - Intemet
Miscellaneous j]~IQ MJLQ MQQ .2..UQ.Q MOO 15JlO..Q 46.15% 230.77% $6,000 - each to City of Stillwater Chamber/Area Chamber
----I~tal~p.era!!.r1.9. 125,434 106,737 125,005 137,005 18,268 30,268 17.11% 28.36%
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elections
Personnel 0 9,200 0 0 (9,200 (9,200 -100.00% . -100.00% Not an election vear
Supplies 0 525 0 0 (525 (525 -100.00% -100.00% Not an election year
Services & Charges 1,822 2,500 1,910 1,910 (590 (590 -23.60% -23.60% Not an election year
Miscellaneous 0 2Q Q .0 T60 !QQ. -100.00% -100.00% Not an election vear
.._Jo!lil.qper.li~i!,g,._.___ __.__1.Jf3.2~ --~?!?~~ 1,9JQ. _~.l~~_o. _l~O,375 ~Q~?_~ -84.45% -84.45%
-'-...-". _..._-_...,.__.._.~
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0
Finance
Personnel 236,662 287,019 283,819 50,357 47,157 21.28% 19.93% Full-time Senior Account Clerk starting Februarv 1
Supplies 3,250 4,050 4,050 800 800 24.62% 24.62% $550 increase in office supplies
Services & Charges 49,370 64,730 64,730 15,360 15,360 31.11% 31.11% $10,000 - Inventorv, $3,000 - Microfilmina
Miscellaneous 2MQ .M5Q .M5Q 1.2OQ UOO 51.06% 51.06% $1,200 - GIS Parcel Data
Total Operating 0 291,632 359,349 356,149 67,717 .64,517 23.22% 22.12%
Capital Outlay 0 46,800 9,065 9,065 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Administration
Personnel 357,247 224,069 250,581 250.581 26,512 26,512 11.83% 11.83% Admin Assistant-full vear vs 1/2 vear (1996) expenditure.
Supplies 9,203 8,800 9,400 9,400 600 600 6.82% 6.82% $2,150 increase-office supplies.
Services & Charges 139,117 _~0,1~ 92,605 88,205 12,425 8,025 15.50% 10.01% ~.E.&OO increase-assessin~~OO increase-mealsnodgina
Miscellaneous 32~979 2lt8.Qo.. 3~OOQ 32..0.QQ 3.200 3.2-00 11.11% 11.11% $3,OOO-Human Rights Commission
-.'----.
Total Operating 538,546 341,849 384,586 380,186 42.737 38,337 12.50% 11.21%
Capital Outlay 7,564 22,000 24,000 24,000 2,000 2,000 9.09% 9.09%
City Attorney
Personnel 54,854 56,172 58,212 58,212 2,040 2,040 3.63% 3.63%
_~_uP.Elies 2,798 --11900 2,900 2,900 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
f-~l!rvi~es & C~~r.9~~ -~3-;-5Ef1 .--J_2_5!_5~~ 127,456 127,456 1,861 1,861 1.48% 1.48%
..--'..- ,.._..:~ -_'~O jbg (20.0 Wg -40.00% -40.00% Decrease to actual
Miscellaneous 2.90.. S..QQ
;---1.2tal. Op'er~tin9 191,~O9 185,167 188,8~! -. 188,868 3,70j 3,701 2.00% 2.00%
199 6-1997 15 96-1997
GENERAL FUND 1995 1996 1997 Budaet $ Increas (Decrease) % Incre~ se (Decrease)
&1uaJ Budae.! ",-_..--t-d Recommencted ~stArf ~QIDmended ReQ~ Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
~!!~~9l!~ Hall 17,647 25.231 14.471 14.471 (10.760 (10,760 -42.65% -42.65% Moved janitorial services to contractual services
Personnel
Supplies 3.315 4.750 5,500 5,500 750 750 15.79% 15.79% $750 increase-equipment repair charges
Services & Charges 46.612 46,100 61,679 61,679 15,579 15.579 33.79% 33.79% Moved ianitorial services from personnel services
Miscellaneous ~ .5QQ QQO QQO 5.0 .50 9.09% 9.09%
Total Operating 66,269 76,631 62,250 62,250 5,619 5,619 7.33% 7.33%
Capital Outlay 0 50,000 0 0 (50,000 (50,000 -100.00% -100.00%
Police
Personnel 1.166,611 1,231,969 1,322,256 1,311,536 90,267 79,547 7.33% 6.46% Full-time Patrol Officer starting April 1
Supplies 34,748 34.843 37,576 37,576 2,733 2,733 7.64% 7.64% $2.000 increase-fuel/$300 increase-tires
~ervices & Charges 123,575 148,006 122,318 122,318 (25,686 {25,666 -17.36% -17.36% Insurance decrease of $31,139
Miscellaneous ~~ ~ 3!L02a ~ M9Q M9.Q 10.42% 17.39%
TotalOperatina 1.364,308 1,449.276 1,520,178 1,511,656 70,902 62.582 4.89% 4.32%
Capital Outlay 72,256 66,535 91,500 65,000 24,965 16,465 37.52% 27.75%
Fire
Personnel 511,761 460,479 497,736 497,738 17.259 17,2~9 3.59% 3.59%
Supplies 9.659 14,300 16,000 26.000 1.700 11.700 11.89% 81.62% $10,000 Fire Department Sesquicentennial
Services & Charges 141,320 139.337 130.655 130.855 (6,482 (8,462 -6.09% -6.09% Insurance decrease of $13,532
Miscellaneous 5,A29 ~ 6.1QQ 6.lQQ ~ ~ 5.51% 5.51%
Total Operating 666,169 640,466 651.293 661,293 10,827 20,627 1.69% 3.25%
Capital Outlay 199.755 335,500 54,200 44,200 (281.300 (291,300 -83.85% -66.83%
Inspection
Personnel 107,348 118,614 125.316 126,963 6,502 8,149 5.47% 6.86% Promotion of Ass't Buildina Insoector to Buildina Insoector
Supplies 2,226 2,450 2,450 2.450 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
~.~rvices & Charges 21,968 24,870 22,211 22,211 (2,659 (2.659 -10.69% -10.69% Insurance decrease of $4.259
Miscellaneous 425 MO ~Q a5Q .Q Q 0.00% 0.00%
Total Operating 132,029 146,964 150,827 152.474 3.643 5,490 2.61% 3.74%
Capital Outlay 21,506 0 35,000 15.000 0 0
Civil Defense
Personnel 774 0 0 0 0 0
Supplies 0 50 50 50 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Services & Charges 424 1,215 846 646 (~ (369 -30.37% -30.37% Decrease to actual
Miscellaneous 1jl1)2 .1.QQ 50 5Q !~ -50.00% -50.00%
-.!C?tal.Qeerating 3,100 1.365 946 946 (419 {419 -30.70% -30.70%
-.f~tal Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0
199 5-1997 1996-1997
GENERAL FUND 1995 1996 1997 Budget $ Increas (Decrease) % Incre se (Decrease)
~I Rudmtl ted ~commended Reauested ~rrlmeru.;led Re~ue~ RecommelKled Comments on 1997 Recommendations
City Enaineer
Personnel 107.483 118,345 239,903 212,892 121,558 94,547 102.71% 79.89% Full-time Jr Engineer (March 1)/50% Eng Tech (June 1)/50% Secretary
Supplies 1,978 4,500 3,500 3,500 (1,000 (1,000 -22.22% -22.22% Decrease to actual
Services & Charges 35,644 21,950 38,506 38,506 16,556 16,556 75.43% 75.43% $20,OOO-Myrtle StlOlive St Dump
Miscellaneous ill ~ ~ ~ .3.Q 30 3.66% 3.66%
Total Operating 145,720 145,615 282,759 255,748 137,144 110,133 94.18% 75.63%
Capital Outlay 11,514 2,500 53,000 47,000 50,500 44,500 2020.00% 1780.00%
Street
Personnel 285,993 298,617 342,084 313,894 43,467 15,277 14.56% 5.12%
Supplies 73,398 76,600 84,600 84,600 8,000 8,000 10.44% 10.44% $5,000 increase-salt & sancll$2,OOO increase-fuel/tires
Services & Charges 141,640 138,711 134,485 134.485 (4,226 (4,226 -3.05% -3.05% Insurance decrease of $6,726
~!scellaneous L~ ~QQQ Q.QQQ 2.-QQQ 3....QQQ ~JJQQ 100.00% 100.00% Increase to actual
Total Operating 508,165 516,928 567,169 538,979 50,241 22,051 9.72% 4.27%
Capital Outlay 123,418 10,000 1,615,000 115,000 1,605,000 105,000 16050.00% 1050.00%
Equip Maint Shop
Personnel 89,293 88,338 91.436 91,436 3,098 3,098 3.51% 3.51%
Supplies 9,239 10,500 10.400 10,400 (100 (100 -0.95% -0.95%
Services & Charges 18,884 25,918 22,589 20,589 (3,329 (5,329 -12.84% -20.56%
Miscellaneous 60 Q 100 1QQ 100 1Q.O
Total Operating 117.476 124,756 124,525 122,525 (231 (2,231 -0.19% -1.79%
Capital Outlay 3,644 5,000 80,000 0 75,000 (5,000 1500.00% -100.00%
Plannina
Personnel 135,297 133,975 163,355 141,269 29,380 7,294 21.93% 5.44%
Supolies 2,840 3,750 3,750 3,750 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Services & Charges 47,466 43,302 41,498 38,498 (1,804 (4,804 -4.17% -11.09% Insurance decrease of $4,154
Miscellaneous t~ 1,250 1.~ 1&Q.Q 2.5.Q ~ 20.00% 20.00% $250 Increase-subscriptions
Total Operating 187,045 182,277 210,103 185,017 27,826 2,740 15.27% 1.50%
Capital Outlay 0 0 8,500 5,000 8,500 5,000
Signs & Liahting
Supplies 17,947 10,000 18,000 18,000 8,000 8,000 80.00% 80.00% Increase to actual
_~ervices & Charges 155,802 132,500 171,500 171,500 39,000 39,000 29.43% 29.43% Increase to actual
Miscellaneous ~~2~ Q l./lQQ l..QIlQ 1.Q00 llQO
-~
Total Operating 174,673 142,500 190,500 190,500 48,000 48,000 33.68% 33.68%
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0
199 0-1997 19 ~6-1997
GENERAL FUND 1995 1996 1997 Budaet $ Increas (Decrease) % Incre~ se (Decrease)
A-cwal .Budaet ~uestgg &lcommend~ Reaue~t~ Re.co-IDmeM!td R~~ RecQ[Tl--'1leml~d CQmm!!m$..M~B.e~!Il1:Mnd.atiQD.S
Unallocated
Personnel 71,650 76,800 77,000 77,000 200 200 0.26% 0.26%
Services & Charges 711,886 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Miscellaneous 124,817 5,000 5,000 5,000 Q 0 0.00% 0.00%
Total Operating 908,353 83,800 84,000 84,000 200 200 0.24% 0.24%
Capital Outlav 34,124 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL OPERATING - 5,134,638 4,448,268 4,924,268 4,849,708 408,283 336,923 9.18% 7.57%
GENERAL FUND
Capital Outlay 473,781 538,335 1,970,265 344,265 1,431,930 (194,070
--
Transfers
Transfer Out - Special Events 7,500 7,500 12,000 12,000 4,500 4,500 60.00% 60.00%
Transfer Out - DARE 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Transfer Out - Brown's Creek 0 2,500 0 0 (2,500 (2,500 -100.00% -100.00%
Transfer Out - Library Fund 544,705 565,203 582,160 635,700 16,957 70,497 3.00% 12.47%
Transfer Out - Park Fund 289,392 347,059 357,471 382,489 10,412 35,430 3.00% 10.21%
Transfer :Out - Storm Sewer 0 0 0 0
Transfer Out - Solid Waste Fund 5?,000 21,500 21,500 21,500 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Transfer Out - Parkina Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0
Transfer Out - Lily Lake Fund 0 0 0 6,100 0 6,100
Total Transfers 897.597 944,762 974,131 1,058,789 29,369 114,027 3.11% 12.07%
SUBTOTAL (Transfers & 6,032,235 5,393,030 5,898,399 5,908,497 437,652 450,950 8.12% 8.36%
Operatina - Excludes
Capital Outlay)
GRAND TOTAL-
GENERAL FUND 6,506,016 5,931,365 7,868,664 6,252,762
19 6-1997 19 6-1997
1995 1996 199 Budaet $ Increa! e .(Decrease) % Increa e (Decrease)
~ 8udaet Reauested Recommended Reauested Recommended Reauested Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
LIBRARY FUND
Revenues
f-Charges for Services 3,483 7,500 4,000 4,OOq (3,500 (3,500 -46.67% -46.67%
Book Sales 2,468 3,500 3,500 3,500 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
f-,----- 10,846 8,000 8,000 10,000 0 2,000 0.00% 25.00% $2,000 increase-interest earnings
,-~iscellaneous
General Fund Transfer .5.44,705 565.203 582,16Q 635,70Q 16.957 lQA97 3.00% 12.47%
Total Operating 561,502 584,203 597,660 653,200 13,457 68,997 2.30% 11.81%
Capital Outlay Bonds 35,324 20,060 27,480 7,800 7,420 (12,260 36.99% -61.12%
-,
Grand Total 596,826 604,263 625,140 661,000 20,877 56,737 3.45% 9.39%
!:i~~.!Lqp~_~t!~!1_!!
Personnel 361,235 385,569 436,708 426,462 51,139 40,893 13.26% 10.61% New 3 Part-time positions
Supplies 85,725 86,230 86,330 86,330 100 100 0.12% 0.12%
Services & Charges 41,729 33,750 38,889 38,889 5,139 5,139 15.23% 15.23% Increase to actual
Miscellaneous 3,579 2,510 M25 M.2.5 ~ .4..115 163.94% 163.94% $4,000-Library Centennial Celebration
Total Operating 492,268 508,059 568,552 558,306 60,493 50,247 11.91% 9.89%
Capital Outlay 25,419 15,760 21,480 21,480 5,720 5,720 36.29% 36.29%
Library Plant
Personnel 22,867 23,204 24,118 24,118 914 914 3.94% 3.94%
Supplies 3,617 4,275 4,250 4,250 (25 (25 -0.58% -0.58%
Services & Charaes 45,745 46,465 44,646 44,646 (1,819 (1,819 -3.91% -3.91%
Miscellaneous 2A9.Q U.QQ 2..2O-Q 2.2.0.0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Total Operating 74,719 76,144 75,214 75,214 (930 (930 -1.22% -1.22%
C~;tal Outlay 9,906 4,300 6,000 6,000 1,700 1,700 39.53% 39.53%
--"--
Total Operating for Library
Operations & Plant (Excludes 566,987 584,203 643,766 633,520 59,563 49,317 10.20% 8.44%
Capital Outlay)
GRAND TOTAL-LIBRARY FUND 602,312 604,263 671,246 661,000
19~ 6-1997 1 96-1997
1995 1996 199 Budget $ Increa~ e (Decrease) % Incre se (Decrease)
Actual Budaet R~uested Recommended Regueste.d Recommended Reguested Recommended Comments on 19Q7 Recommendations
PARK FUND
Revenue
Trust Income 17,489 7,000 7,000 11,000 0 4,000 0.00% 57.14% $4,000 increase
Miscellaneous 26,171 7,400 9,400 10,900 2,000 3,500 27.03% 47.30% $2,OOO-donations/$1,500-sale of property
General Fund Transfer 289,392 347,059 357,471 382,489 10,412 35,430 3.00% 10.21%
Total Operating 333,052 361 ,459 373,871 404,389 12,412 42,930 3.43% 11.88%
Capital Outlay Bonds I 166,094 295,500 514,000 328,000 218,500 73.94% 0.00%
Grand Total 499,146 656,959 887,871 732,389 230,912 42,930 35.15% 6.53%
--
---. -
Parks Expenditures
Personnel 252,047 265,077 353,780 321 ,403 88,703 56,326 33.46% 21.25% Full-time Laborer/50% Secretary
Supplies 22,605 25,550 27,200 25,200 1,650 (350 6.46% -1.37%
Services & Charges 48,808 67,432 47,186 47,186 (20,246 (20,246 -30.02% -30.02%
Miscellaneous 2,867 3,400 3.60Q 3.600 200 200 5.88% 5.88%
Total Operating 326,327 361,459 431,766 397,389 70,307 35,930 19.45% 9.94%
Capital Outlay 258,075 295,500 514,000 335,000 218,500 39,500 73.94% 13.37%
.
GRAND TOTAL-PARK FUND 584,402 656,959 945,766 732,389 288,807 75,430 43.96% 11 .48%
19 96-1997 1 96-1997
1995 1996 199 Budget $ Increa ~e (Decrease) % Incre se (Decrease)
~ ~ R~~ Recommended ~ueMed ~mended BQg~ Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
SEWER FUND
Revenues
Service Charges 1,305,125 1,310,000 1,346,000 1,346,000 36,000 36,000 2.75% 2.75%
Other Charges 204,005 105,000 122,000 122,000 17,000 17,000 16.19% 16.19% $20,000 increase-SAC
Interest Income 71,835 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Miscellaneous 1.25.Q Q ~QQQ 4Q..QQQ 4Q..QQQ ~-.JlQ.Q $40,000 increase-penalty charges
Total Operating 1,582,215 1,465,000 1,558,000 1,558,000 93,000 93,000 6.35% 6.35%
Expenses
Personnel 205,183 216,404 200,817 200,817 (15,587 (15,587 -7.20% -7.20%
Supplies 10,049 6,500 8,500 8,500 2,000 2,000 30.77% 30.77% $500 increase-tires/$1,500-equip repair supplies
Services & Charges 1,367,046 1,227,299 1,394,532 1,394,532 167,233 167,233 13.63% 13.63% $146,330 increase-Metro Waste
Miscellaneous 1,446 0 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 Increase to actual
Depreciation 22...80.9 ~QQ.Q 24.-000 24..QQO Q Q 0.00% 0.00%
Total Operating 1,606,533 1,474,203 1,630,049 1,630,049 155,846 155,846 10.57% 10.57%
Capital Outlay 0 60,000 620,000 340,000 560,000 280,000
GRANDTOTAL~EWERFUND 1,606,533 1,534,203 2,250,049 1,970,049
e
19( 6-1997 199 6-1997
1995 1996 199 Budget $ Increa~ e (Decrease) % Increas e (Decrease)
Actual .6!.Ldaet Reouested Recommended Reouested Recommended Reouested Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
STORM SEWER FUND
Revenue
r-service Charge 0 150,000 173,000 173,000 23,000 23,000 15.33% 15.33% $23,000 increased to actual
Miscellaneous 2,004 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 increase-interest earnings
--=----- 0 0 0 0 Q 0
Transfer In
Total Operating 2,004 150,000 175,000 175,000 25,000 25,000 16.67% 16.67%
Expenses
Personnel 0 0 24,416 24,416 24,416 24,416 50% Eng Technician
Services and Charges 13,693 33,500 171,800 171,800. 138,300 138,300 412.84% 412.84% $140,000 increase-storm sewer repair projects
Miscellaneous 2..15Q 0 0 0 0 p
Total Operating 15,843 33,500 196,216 196,216 162,716 162,716
19! 16-1997 1 96-1997
1995 1996 199 Budoet $ Increa! e (Decrease) % Incre se (Decrease)
~ Re Recommended t Recommended Re Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
SOLID WASTE FUND
Revenues
Services & Charges 1,129,047 1,163,000 1,164,000 1,164,000 1,000 1,000 0.09% 0.09%
Miscellaneous 1,480 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $1.000 increase-interest eaminas
General Fund Transfers 55,000 21,500 21,500 21,500 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
-..;;.---- ~ .5.M.5.5 SLOOO ~OO ~ 3M! 0.61% 0.61%
Recycling Grant
~~J Operatina 1,244,234 1.241,155 1,243,500 1,243,500 2,345 2,345 0.19% 0.19%
Expenses
Supplies 3,079 2,700 3,000 3,000 300 300 11.11% 11.11% Increase to actual
Services & Charges - 1,242,786 1,235,100 1,239,200 1,239,200 4,100 0 0.33% 0.00%
Miscellaneous 13 0 0 0 0 0
!-()epreciation 1.1Z4 0 Q Q 0 0
TotalOperatina 1,247,652 1,237,800 1,242,200 1,242,200 4,400 300 0.36% 0.02%
e
19 6-1997 19< 6-1997
1995 1996 1997 Budget $ Increa~ e (Decrease) % Increa e (Decrease)
Actual Bucla..et Re...m,JesteQ Recommend.e.d ReJtuested ~commended Re.Quested RecommendeQ CQrnments on 1997 Recommendations
PARKING FUND
Revenues
Permits 16,900 15,000 17,000 17,000 2,000 2,000 13.33% 13.33% Increase to actual
Parking Tickets 16,421 12,000 16,000 16,000 4,000 4,000 33.33% 33.33% Increase to actual
Parking Fines 8,136 15,000 10,000 10,000 (5,000 (5,000 -33.33% -33.33% Decrease to actual
Interest 8,721 4,000 4,000 4,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Miscellaneous fL266 0 Q.25Q 6,250 Q.25Q 6,250 Parking rental-Yacht Club
Total 56,444 46,000 53,250 53,250 7,250 7,250 15.76% 15.76%
Expenses
f-= 21,29~ 35,014 29,401 29,401 (5,613 (5,613 -16.03% -16.03%
Personnel
f-~~"p'lies 118 700 600 600 (100 (100 -14.29% -14.29-%
Services & Charges 30,480 30,875 28,946 28,946 (1,929 (1,929 -6.25% -6.25%
Miscellaneous 344 150 150 150 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Total Operating 52,238 66,739 59,097 59,097 (7,642 (7,642 -11.45% -11.45%
e
19( 6-1997 19~ 6-1997
1995 1996 1997 J3udget $ Increa~ e (Decrease) % Increa e (Decrease)
Actual Bucl~t Reouested Recommended ReJ:l!Jested Recommended Reouested Recommended Comments on 1997 Recommendations
LIL Y LAKE FUND
Revenues
""Arena Rental 5,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
Softball Field Fees 2,498 3,500 2,500 2,500 (1,000 (1,000 -28.57% -28.57% Decrease to actual
Miscellaneous 4,945 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0 0.00% 0.00%
General Fund Transfers 0 0 0 6,100 0 2. 100
Total Operating 12,443 18,500 17,500 23,600 (1,000 5,100 -5.41% 27.57%
Capital Outlay Bonds 9,300 12,000 86,100 25,000 74,100 13,000 617.50% 108.33%
!=~p.~J.l~~s
Personnel 10,232 11,303 1.3,995 13,995 2,6~2 2,692 23.82% 23.82% $2,500 increase-Lifeguard salaries
Supplies 363 1,200 2,100 2,600 900 1,400 75.00% 116.67% $1,800 increase-supplies/top soil/seed (Lily Lake Ballfield)
Services & Charges 16,691 13,754 16,401 16,401 2,647 2,647 19.25% 19.25% Increase to actual
Depreciation 17,688 0 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous 87 500 600 100 100 [400 20.00% -80.00%
Total Operating 45,061 26,757 33,096 33,096 6,339 6,339 23.69% 23.69%
Capital Outlay 0 12,000 86,100 31,100 74,100 19,100
GRAND TOT AL-L1L Y
LAKE FUND 45,061 38,757 119,196 64,196
Page 1 of 4
'e
Page 2 of 4
~
1997 CAPITAL OUTLAY
Department Requested Recommended
e Earks
Pioneer Park $150,000 $0
Rebuild wall at Pioneer Park $185,000 $185,000
Basketball court at Staples Park $25,000 $25,000
Play equipment at Sunrise Park $30,000 $30,000
Blacktop at Ramsey Grove Park $8,000 $8,000
Restrooms at Benson Park $25,000 $0
Privacy Fence at Benson Park $0 $3,000 *
Wind screens for tennis courts
for Lily Lake, Northland & Staples $1,800 $1,800 *
Boardwalk and walking path at McKusick $50,000 $50,000
(3) Mowers $1,800 $1,800 *
(2) Weed Whips $400 $400 *
Infield grooming machine $15,000 $15,000
1/2 Ton Pickup Truck $22,000 $15,000
Total Operating: $7,000 *
Total Bonded: $328,000
TOTAL PARKS FUND: $514,000 $335,000
Sewer
(1/4) Public Works Facility $500,000 $0
Public Works Facility Design $0 $50,000 +
Public Works Facility Land $0 $200,000 +
(2) One-Ton Trucks $60,000 $30,000 +
Aiple Lift Station $15,000 $15,000 +
Lily Lake Lift Station $15,000 $15,000 +
Myrtle Street Lift Station $30,000 $30,000 +
Total Operating: $340,000 +
Total Bonded: $0
TOTAL SEWER FUND: $620,000 $340,000
Lily Lake
Fence on ballfield backstop $3,000 $3,000 *
Picnic area and walkway at Beach $65,000 $20,000
Lights and Timers for ballfield and tennis courts $15,000 $5,000
Heater and forks for skid loader $3,100 $3,100 *
Total Operating: $6,100 *
Total Bonded: $25,000
TOTAL LILY LAKE FUND: $86,100 $31,100
1-
Page 3 of 4
,," ~'~
1997 CAPITAL OUTLAY
Department
Requested Recommended
e
GRAND TOTAL - CAPITAL OUTLAY 1997:
$3,217,845
$1,077.845
TOTAL Non-Bonded Capital Outlay
Other Funds: All items less than $5,000
Sewer Fund:
$56,080 *
$340,000 +
TOTAL Bonded Capital Outlay:
$681.765
e
Page 4 of 4
~-.~- ~ -~_~""-.c.~"""'~,_""~'_~"".-r'-2~'-O-':{'%",',,, ".
I
i
.1l ~
~l
.~
F
v
e
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE No. SUB/96-70
Planning Commission Date: November 18,1996
Project Location: Highway 36
Comprehensive Plan District: Business Park Commercial
Zoning District: BP-C
Applicant's Name: Robert Brackey
Type of Application: Subdivision
Project Description: A minor subdivision of 161,828 square feet into a 102,500
square foot parcel and a 59,328 square foot parcel.
Discussion: The request is to divide one large parcel into two parcels. Parcel A would
be 3.79 acres or 250 feet by 410 feet (102,500 ~quare feet), and Parcel B would be
2.19 acres or 144 feet by 412 feet (59,328 square feet). The subdivision is for-
development purposes.
Because the property is situated on the frontage road of Highway 36, a copy of the
survey was sent to the Minnesota Department of Transportation for approval. They are
mainly concerned with the curb cuts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Approval of Minnesota Department of Transportation.
2. Approval of City Engineer and Community Development Director.
Recommendation: Approved as conditioned.
Findings: The subdivision meets the development regulations of the zoning and
subdivision ordinances.
Attachments: Application form, Survey
CPC Action on 11-18-96: +5-0 approval.
e
.' ':,
.... ,,'.. .. I.... a...-.-..____~.._......_._~....
." ".::;':::;.>. "-... -"'
~.'~....'.'.'....'.'
\ti:'1Jj)
METRO PLANNING 3 SOUTH Fax:612-582-1308
e
~
..... .. .
Nov 18 '96 16:23
P.Ol
~
l(PJ
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 82
Roseville, MN 55113
e
November 18) 1996
~
I(-fr\~
V
Steve Russull
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
FAX#: 439-0456
Dear Mr. Russell:
I understand that the planning co lTI 111 ission will be reviewing at its November 18th meeting a
request from Robert Brackey for a minor subdivision to divide an existing parcel into two lots
(A and B). The existing lot is located just east of ~akers Square on the Highway 36 frontage
Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commer~ial District (Case No. SUB/96-70),
As the city and property Owner are aware the State of Minnesota is in the process of
purchasing right-of-way to reconstruct Highway 36 an9 the abutting frontage roads. The
parcel in question is one of the properties and is needed for the realignment of the frontage
road near Oakgreen and Greeley Streets. The realignment will require half of parcel B and a
small portion of the south edge of parcel A.
With our current acquisition schedule I would expect that an offer to purchase the required
right-of-way will be made to the property owner this spring. Sub-dividing the parcel at this
time will likely increase the public's cost of acquisition of this parcel.
Therefore I do not believe it is the publics best interest to allow this parcel to be sub-divided at
this time. Please present this concern to the planning commission at this evenings planning
meeting. If you have any questions 1 can be reached at 582-1320.
Sincerely yours,
A~P~J~
Mn/DOT Project Manager
_I
~~~~!~~70
Receipt No.: 51' 3'7 b
.PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
)
... .".
..I" . .
...
.~
\ ........ ./
... -,...
e
ACfION REQUESTED:
COMMUNIlY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ Certificate of Compliance
CITY OF STILLWATER ~ Conditional or Special Use Permit
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET _ Design Review
STILLWATER, MN 55082 _ Planned Unit Development
_ ;variance
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
Subdivision
.l:L Resubdivision
Total Fee
FEE(l)
$70
$70/170
-0-
5270
570
$300
$300
$100+$50/lot
$50
.$50.00
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application.
PROPERlY IDENTIFICATION
Address of Project Hiqhway 36 ASsessor's Parcel No. Qo:n-?l?O
Zoning District Description of Project. Subdivide Parcel into 2 lots for
'development purposes: the lots are shown as Parcel A and Parcel B on attached
Plat of Survey; Legal descriptions are on Exhibit A attached.
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the
best of my knowledge and belief. true and correct. I further certify I will complY with the pennit if it is granted and used."
PropertyOwner Robert L. Brackey RepresentativeFred A. Kueppp-rs, ,Ir., At:torne:
MailingAddrc:ss 1336 Jackson Street MailingAddress 386 Wabasha St. N., # 1350
Rt- Prill' r MN 5'" 117 ~t- P;:1111 r M"'l 55102
Telephone NO,. 489-131~. T~ePhone~ i7. -,I~.. .
~aturetAi;.:J. (h ~ Slgnature~r~
. SITE AND PROJECf DESCRIPTION
Parcel A 3.79 acres 250 x 410 -
1.0 -Par(~~l B.2.19 acres 144 x 412
t :Size OlmenSlOnS) x Total building floor Area None
Land Area Existing sq. ft.
Height of Buildings: Stories Feet Proposed sq. ft.
Principal Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Accessory Number of off street parking spaces provided
sq. ft.
~DITION.Ar. ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE REQUIRED AS PART OF APPLICATION
lrEVIEW
Revised 9/19195
-":;"';"- - " "~",-,,"~~r"r.."C"!,'~"'~'~~-"';,'~""""",",;~-:~~, ~ -ry_,.,',~ -
-''''''~''.."::~:;:'::!":::';iIr.~,.:"".,.# ,.=~...... ~..,...,".-.~.,.e~.~II!!'~Ir'lI.',",'''''''''' II ,.." .
~
f:d;~!~.~
~~:~'
e
~9
. , 10....
KUEPPERS, HACKEL & KUEPPERS, PA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1350 CAPITAL CENTRE
386 WABASHA STREET NORTH
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
e
l"RED A. KUEPPERS, JR.
JOAN M. HACKEL
JOSEPH F.KUEPPERS
(612) 228-U04
FAX (612) 297-6599
OF COUNSEL
RONALD PATRICK SMITH
October 23, 1996
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: Our File No. 6882-53
Dave's Barbecue
Dear Mr. Russell:
Enclosed is an Application submitted on behalf of Robert L. Brackey for a minor subdivision
of lands in the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 33-30-20 in the City of
Stillwater. Also enclosed is a survey of the property prepared by Joel Anez and dated
October 3, 1996. This plat depicts the two parcels which are to result from the subdivision.
The plat drawing depicts proposed utility and drainage easements along the boundary lines of
the parcels. These have been shown in anticipation of a City request for such easements, but
they have not yet been established of record. If requested by the City, Mr. Brackey will es-
tablish the easements by separate instrument.
We enclose our check payable to the City in the amount of $50.00 in payment of the Applica-
tion fee.
Very truly yours,
F AKjr/pmt
Enclosures
c: Robert L Brackey
_I
.
.'0\ ..
e
ie
o
~
~
EXHIBIT A
TO APPLICATION FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
Parcel A
The East 250 feet of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 30, Range 20, subject to Trunk Highway No. 36. .
Parcel B
The West 144.88 feet of the East 394.88 feet of the South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section 33, Township 30, Range 20, subject to Trunk Highway No. 36.
..."..::~~'.':>?",~':,p;f',:"'-__~:-""'I":~~~;~,:"-~-",,-,-",._-_.~-;,,'-, - ....--.?..-:,._""';~,-~. ""~ __ ""'~'.""""., '_ -.Vl'i .,~.,,~_,", .."",..".......'II'\'I!..""""_~1II'"'~""""''''''".'.,,'.., ..,
I ,. !'. ~.:.:.::~;. ~(.
~ ....c.:.,.;o:. ~".1:;i"'~'l~r;'" . I . '. I 11'1':"'-':'--
~ _.~"'~~Y._llQr. '-;',",.., .~..
TRUNK 'HIGH'WAY'.NO" :36 .:
( f.k.a. Trunk HIghway: No,' 212). :",.
;
~
F
"
~
it
o
N
a:
I
'Og
-0-
.. I
.....
-...
:!~
.
~. :
.....CIO
-.; i CD
~lf eft
_. I/)
0..... CD
"i i
j'f i
_N .
......... .
~Vi
,
L~
~~
,-' 2"':- i 4'4:g,:=- -:::r '-:- '''1:'': "'li~ -- 250.otI-:-- :!i:),;I'M\iH.~1 .
r - ~::iO ;;.-~ ~ u';1~~t" <~~~.~;:-'~. .-~':-'h~'~
I Aa ,.., 0.-_1, I(M31I .1. " ,';~;' J,~~i;~~~i/~,:.t~;l~,,?:~~ ~~r.:1~1 t
Lit I I }, .\....,. ;,.I'l '.};; . ....,. ~ .::.... ~. ,
. · 0 .::r ... . , . . 'p. ,~..,.,.,q' :' "':",,~ . ;"'~
i ~~r i I ~ r';':;\\:~:0;;;~~\:~J~;~f:"
I . '0 J, " ~..,. . . :....I....w....~ :t.. "...," I.~.I
I ~.'J I I i~. ..:;;:',<:'~,~ ;'..~3~;:~~.").~~~~I~~~~i~.f.:;:.;{~;'~~~1 ....,.
I .. .. I I....., .. ,.'. ., :.....r. ,"","" ..' 'I''''.li'"'f I
. i-VI 8 cJ . 'r.' r.~:: '. ~\.;;_::..~ :::>'.::::;-~::'t-'i ':i':'X ,h "'~ .
I ;1::3. I' oJ! ,.~,.,:": ";,',;.;';,:,' \;; ~"" I
I "0;;......1 I, ~.' .' . ~,,"~'.:':' ~:."""''i.1
I: ....~.)" I -....... '. .....; '.,' 'r,"./ii::l~
I~ :5~~ . ~I 1~.3~ PA'R'CEL~;" :A':. 'Oy.
N _............. ~ - I '. - -" .....Ui
I; ll_i 'f111o,. ., ':5.11
II 'to III 'I II ~ ~ .3.79 '. acres .'. ~..! ...;;-."
I ~----- I -' I (/NC/.UDING R/V) 0 ~ ,
N ..... wU\
I PARCEL 8' :.i~ 2.36"acres::\',,,"',
I 2.19 .acres: ..;'. ". fDrCLUDING R/v'.. ,:~:'.:l;~:: ,. i"
I (INCLUDING R/V) .' .. '. .... ......1 1.
I I I . ,:.;.:...:......;.._:.::_~.:;;!..::::.::.:;:.:-.;;.:-- : '.
T-----------------, r-- 394.1llI -^ _____________
144 IllI ------r ------------- 2.....00 . . <i/
,,;,----. I I . , .. ',' I
r' · ..1. . . . . .' ... '. '.' .. \" . , ~. I '.r
I '.l - .. . . "i" · "
1.37 acres (,..... '. '.',' i~'.: ~.' '0\
I (FXCLUDING R/W' J T.,-.."lt)WUio ". .:'. .", :.: ':':';.
~---- ~- ~---o------~--~~
'-s89~.W ,,';.90- ---:-.-NWrll~.-::-EO.04 ,~ -
! ~. _CM~~~..r,~..,.. .~:......
8 ~
~ 5
I III
....1
....,
"
,
:.
;r
:..
;,{;I
.~
I
N
;;1
..~
i.f'
f
.\
~f
J
-----.
-
I/)
;..,
.
;;
11'1
...
.
~
'i'
I
(,' ;..
-c..,";;;; c.._ w..
:;)
, .:~ ..::'~.,~ ',; :"., . " . \..., :..,
,.... ~ _: 'i: (: ~'" I,.. "".
.'.: : ~:.ri~~'::;,:,"i. . (,;;;.:i ,:.. i'~
't
:,i
l.:
Soulh line Sec. 33.
TJON-R20W.,
~ ""^r S 119.50'2':, E .=-927.50-- 1. _
~ Wash Ca. C.I.U.
. S. W. Corntr
Sec. J3- TJON-R20W
. ..
.' .'.:; .:~ .'J {,:~;r';~.;;.,.
. -. '-
--144.01-;"
S 89"SO'2T E
.> :~,
-..--...394.99 .-........
".. t,"
". ;::.* ~.,..~~t";; ~ '~~:<\;;.,~''\:.i
. '/! ~ ~', -.;,'.~.:. t
, '.' ",' " ~ ': '.. .
!
'~
~
i'
,<
'1';:
1:;
. Denotes 1/2 Inch Iron pipe monument found marked
with a plastic cap inscribed ANEZ RLS 13775 set by.
me. Joel T. Anez. In a previous survey.
o DenoteS 1/2 Inch Iron pIpe monument set marked
with a plastic cop inscribed ANEZ RLS 13775.
. ..., -
....
.;; -
'., '
:',\'.r
.......~:.:.:
~:\{.; "j
".
.;1
\':':",/.;t-
'.','
,...... . '. .~'" :.:,.';
~:;. I .. '. ':"
.. ';).L.J
~. ,.-: " .. . .
,<~;;,~;,~tnt~ ';\~;:7
JlQIE:.
The north right of way line of Trunk HIghway No.
has been surveyed and located based on !.AN DOT
monumented centerline of the westbound lone.
36
~ :f'Y:.):.
.....'.
,;:.. .' . . . . '.J I . ~. .. " ~.'.~ ........ . 4::.-, .; , :. " "I . f '.
f~"~ {.l',;....l. .,tJJ': 't'; ""i ~.<o).;"&."'t'r.t.l...} \"'~"'l.''''''~'.r'~~' \..~. .:.... ""..:''.'r~~~::~::'.~.
J/>':l'<,'i~' '>< :S:'i ";}'/l"',?i':'" r
-1-----,3-----.-
. ~--i-SW 11/4--~-1 SE
"I .
-'-1-' ~- .~ T~~
VICINITY MAP'
Sec, 33-T3ON-R20W
...../..'
.... ......
I
i
en.
CD
c:i
CD
CD
(NOT 111 tc.OL[) .
;..~;.:.,:
(,~t
. '1!-:,,:,- .
'.,
---
..... ;.
&,J (,
\ ,) 1
------ .
"}
"7 ,~
::
. ,
. "
:'.. ~.
: .. . :'.
i;.' \ .' ~
'.
.' ,.:....: .. .
'.~ '. , . . t,
".:." . .. .,'.. ..?:~: ..:~<~1)::!....:
;'. S89"SO'2"E"-'-1322.48';:"~~. . :t~<,........,....'.i
."':" ~.- - -: ~'i ~. .:,. ,.' ;,,':..:.:......::......:--.-::.
. . '.' '''Wosh Co. 'C.I.IA. '., .
. . 5.1/4 Cotner .' it. '.:' ,.... .:,........;,~.".,..:.~~.-.:....
.~. , ..., . Sec. 33-T3ClN-R20W .',. . ...... '." .'
. . ". ':-. .;.' :..._:.:;:.._.~:.>'.,.;".:. ,.'. . ,.'-,: :..........7"1:..;:..~.~
I hereby' certify to Robert L:' Brackey. S ct. D Lond HoIdlngs.~ Inc...;
. Old Republic Natlonol ntle Insurance. Inc.. and Clty.af Stillwater.'...
. Minnesota, that this survey. .plan or. report was prepared by mec
. .'. under my :dlr.ect. supervision. and that I om. 0 duly Registered. Lan-
. SurveYor. under the laws. of the. State. of MInnesota..: . ..'::: :".L.. .'
.... ~~ " Ld~P?~";6>
Joel. . Anez.. !.Alnn~sota...~~.~:,.:,)3~7~.,<;;:: ." ~ o~~~.~ ' . .:,;:,;:.,:;
NOTE(Offlclot' copies' are ~rl~~, s.eo~ed.:.:. ." nc ....203.......-: .',..'
"', .
..' ..:
.' I.
. .
,
':",-":':'
....: ~._~. '.
,". '
~'.~.....~~.,:.::~:.~.~(~...:~::;:t::.,\rhit~\ .'~' ~: ;...., '.. . .
:,,',.) ......,". ~......~,..\oi\~-\..f....:io'~;:.:t!..s~...\";.'J':,,,.j:,,..'...(........,....~., '\' ..'
e
".....
. -' ~ . ..~. . '
f. ',.. .~I .
'!..'
'. ..:',i
;'.........:r.
'..'" ...
e
METRO PLANNING 3 SOUTH-Pax:612.;;.582-1308 Nov 27 '96
~.. ----
.,&) Minnesota Department ofTranoportalion' '"
~~ _ Metropolitan Division
Cl' Tl\~~
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 82
Roseville, MN 55113
.
,.
~
;
II!
,.,.
b1
~
~'~
~
...
r .
,.-
~
~
14:11 P.01
I:
f':'
5t 1~ / f i - 7 i7
November 27, 1996
Steve Russull
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
FAX#: 439-0456
Dear Mr. Russell:
At the November 18th planning commission meeti.ng Mn/DOT objected to the proposed
subdivision by Robert Brackey of t1le parcel just east of Bakers Square on the Highway 36
frontage Road in the BP-C, Business Park Commercial District (Case No. SUB/96-70). We
have since met with the owner and have a better understanding of his plans for the parcel.
Mn/DOTs preference would still be that any subdivision of the lot occur after the frontage
road acquisition occurs.' However, given the owners pending sale and development of the
parcel A, Mn/DOT withdraws its objection to the subdivision.
As stated in my November 18, letter the State of Minnesota is in the process of purchasing
right-of-way to reconStIUct Highway 36 and the abutting frontage roads and will be purchasing
the western half of parcel B. With our current acquisition schedule I would expect that an
offer to purchase the right-of-way will be made to the property owner this spring. Disposition
of the remaining land in parcel B following construction of the frontage road will need to be
determined at a future date.
If you have any questions I can be reached at 582-1320.
Sincerely yours,
dJ~. )tWf~
Adam Josep'~n, P .E.
Mn/DOT Project Manager
cc;
Robert Brackey (FAX# 489-1405)
Keith Slater MnlDOT RlW
Sherry Nanlsiewicz Mn/DOT Planning
'e
e
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUB/96-71
Planning Commission Date: November 18,1996
Project Location: 12811 62nd Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Campus Research District
Zoning District: CR-D
Applicant's Name: James Bradshaw
Type of Application-. Subdivision
Project Description: A minor subdivision involving an exchange of 0.32 acres.
Discussion: The applicant is proposing to trade 0.32 acres ofland to the west of the adjacent
landowner for 0.32 acres to the east of the same landowner (see attached survey). The westerly
0.32 acres was available for a road that will no longer be needed to access the applicants
property. The new access to the applicants land will be from a Frontage Road extending Curve
Crest Boulevard.
Conditions of Approval:
1. Approval of City Engineer.
Recommendation: Approved as conditioned.
Findings: The subdivision meets the development regulations of the zoning and subdivision
ordinances.
Attachments: Application form, survey /legal description
CPC Action on 11-18-96: +5-0 approval
v
..
\"
~e No:
~~~te Filed:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No. .
.. .' ._,().. '
.;.. 1:
B
.
...
.PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACflON REQUESTED:
OMMUNl1Y DEVELOpMENT DEPARTMENT _ Certificate of Compliance
l1Y OF STILLWATER ~ Conditional or Special Use Permit
6 NORTH FOURTH STREET _ Design Review
TILLWATER, MN 55082 _ Planned Unit Development
_ .;variance
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
_ Subdivision
~ ResubdivisioIl..,..
oW Fee
e
. FEE(l)
$70
$70/170
-0-
$270
570
$300
$300
. !!?+S5P/lot
rhe applicant is responsible 'for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
.ubmitted in connection with any application.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
'Il. 811- 'Gild .>~e::r .. .
~ddress of Project and Highway 36 and County 5 (N. W. A'sf8]Oh P~rce~ No:
~oning DistrictCampus Resear@escription of Project. . (J...r;;--$lI. -g.P/eJIJ / ON
i and Funeral Related Services .
~'I haeby state the ftregoing statements and all data, information and evide~e submitted haewith in all respects, to the
best of my lcnowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify 1 will complY with the permit if it is granted and used. II
Property Owner
~ James H. Bradshaw
Mailing Address 1310 Hillcre,st Drive
Stillwater, MN 55082
Telephone 623
iProperty Owner William and Rita Spangler
Mailing Address 12811-62nd Street'
Stillwater, MN 55082
Telephone No. 4,:\Q-040Q
Signature .#" ~~~
SITE AND PROJECf DESC
Lot Size (dimensions) x
Land AIea
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
Total building floor Area sq. ft.
Existing sq. ft.
Proposed sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces provided
Feet
.6
(l)ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE REQUIRED AS PART OF APPLICATION
REVIEW
NOTE: This is a square foot for square foot property exchange between the above named
property owners. The property is located'at the Northwest corner of Highway 36 and
Revised 9/19195 County Road 5 in the City of Stillwater.
e,
I
--'--:-'.~:-._-:------'='---.'''-,~,.",:~~'....---~-:: ...._~:._."'.:~._,::-....7":._~;..-:."""7..;..- .~.. .."'.....;.;.::~.~
~
e
Ie
October 21, 1996
PROPOSED BRADSHAW/SPANGLER MINOR SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED SPANGLER TO BRADSHAW PARCEL DESCRIPTION
All that part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 30 North,
Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows, to wit:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence
South 89 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line thereof,
42.00 feet; thence South 65 degrees 12 minutes 11 seconds East 214.95 feet; thence easterly
along a tangential curve, concave to the north, radius 1333.12 feet, central angle 17 degrees 03
minutes 51 seconds, 397.04 feet; thence South 82 degrees 16 minutes 02 seconds East, along
tangent, 806.81 feet; thence South 82 degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds East 538.44 feet to the
point of beginning of the parcel being described; thence continuing South 82 degrees 56 minutes
16 seconds East 62.38 feet; thence South 19 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds West 227.39 feet;
thence North 81 degrees 14 minutes 14 seconds West 61.99 feet, more or less, to the intersection
with a line which bears South 19 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds West from the point of
beginning; thence North 19 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds East along said line 225.51 feet, more
or less, to the point of beginning.
Containing 13775 square feet, or 0.316 acres, more or less, subject to the right-of-way of 62nd
Street North along the northerly line thereof.
Subject to and together with any other valid easements, reservations or restrictions.
Stack Land Surveying
9090 North Fairy Falls Road
Stillwater, MN 55082
tel: (612) 439-5630
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or Wider my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor Wider
theLa~esota~
~
Date /"--Z/-'~ Reg. No. /J77~
.e
October 21, 1996
PROPOSED BRADSHAW/SPANGLER MINOR SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED BRADSHAW TO SPANGLER PARCEL DESCRIPTION
(former 66'+- roadway and utility esmt. as desc. in Doc. No's. 444111 and 444132)
All that part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 30 North
Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows, to wit:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence
South 89 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line thereof,
42.00 feet; thence South 65 degrees 12 minutes 11 seconds East 214.95 feet; thence easterly
along a tangential curve, concave to the north, radius 1333. 12 feet, central angle 17 degrees 03
minutes 51 seconds, 397.04 feet; thence South 82 degrees 16 minutes 02 seconds East along
tangent 806.81 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel being described; thence South 82
degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds East 66.50 feet; thence South 209.73 feet; thence North 81
degrees 14 minutes 14 seconds West 66.78 feet, more or less, to the intersection with a line which
bears South from the point of beginning; thence North 207.73 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 13775 square feet, or 0.316 acres, more or less, subject to the right-of-way of62nd
Street North along the northerly line thereof
Subject to and together with any other valid easements, reservations or restrictions.
Note:
The above described parcel is presently also subject to an easement for roadway and utility
purposes as specifically described in Doc. No's. 444111 and 444132, Office of the County
Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. These easements will remain in force unless
extinguished by appropriate deed exchanges. Discuss this matter with legal counsel for an opinion
on what specific steps are required to address this matter.
Stack Land Surveying
9090 North Fairy Falls Road
Stillwater, MN 55082
e tel: (612) 439-5630
'e
October 21, 1996
PROPOSED BRADSHAW/SPANGLER MINOR SUBDIVISION
(proposed revised Spangler, formerly Foslien,Parcel Description)
(supersedes description dated 12-29-82)
PROPOSED OVERALL REVISED SPANGLER DESCRIPTION
All that part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 30 North,
Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described a follows, to wit;
Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence
South 89 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line thereof
42.00 feet; thence South 65 degrees 12 minutes 11 seconds East 214.95 feet; thence easterly
along a tangential curve, concave to the north, radius 1333.12 feet, central angle 17 degrees 03
minutes 51 seconds, 397.04 feet; thence South 82 degrees 16 minutes 02 seconds East along
tangent 806.81 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel being described; thence South 82
degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds East 538.44 feet; thence South 19 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds
West 225.51 feet; thence North 81 degrees 14 minutes 14 seconds West 463.13 feet, more or
less, to the intersection with a line which bears South from the point of beginning; thence North
207.73 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 2.45 acres, more or less, subject to the right-of-way of 62nd Street North along the
northerly line thereof.
Subject to and together with any other valid easements, reservations or restrictions.
Note:
The westerly 66'+- of the above described parcel is subject to an easement for roadway and utility
purposes as specifically described in Doc. No's. 444111 and 444132, Office of the County
Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota. These easements will remain in force unless
extinguished by appropriate deed exchanges. Discuss this matter with legal counsel for an opinion
on what specific steps are required to address this matter.
Stack Land Surveying
9090 North Fairy Falls Road
Stillwater, MN 55082
tel: (612) 439-5630
I hereby certifY that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under
th~fMinneSO~
Dae/.?"Z/-'..c~~NO. /j 77~
e
.e
Sheet 1
October 21, 1996
PROPOSED BRADSHAW/SPANGLER MINOR SUBDIVISION
(proposed Bradshaw, formerly Orthopaedic Consult., Parcel Description)
(supersedes description dated 12-29-82)
PROPOSED OVERALL REVISED BRADSHAW DESCRIPTION
e
All that part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 30 North,
Range 20 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows, to wit:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence
South 89 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line thereof,
42.00 feet~ thence South 65 degrees 12 minutes 11 seconds East 214.95 feet~ thence easterly
along a tangential curve, concave to the north, radius 1333.12 feet, central angle 17 degrees 03
minutes 51 seconds, 397.04 feet~ thence South 82 degrees 16 minutes 02 seconds East, along
tangent 806.81 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A'\ thence South 82 degrees 56
minutes 16 seconds East along a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A" a distance of 538.44 feet
to the point of beginning of the parcel being described and the end of said "Line A"~ thence South
19 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds West 225.51 feet; thence North 81 degrees 14 minutes 14
seconds West 463.13 feet, more or less, to the intersection with a line which bears South from the
before described "Point A"~ thence continuing North 81 degrees 14 minutes 14 seconds West
26.52 feet~ thence South 18 degrees 37 minutes 36 seconds West 124.09 feet~ thence South 87
degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds West 1029 .11 feet~ thence North 05 degrees 07 minutes 41
seconds West 229.04 feet; thence West 299.15 feet, more or less, to the westerly line of said
South Half of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 00 degree 21 minutes 34 seconds East along
said westerly line 877.34 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner thereof~ thence South 89
degrees 31 minutes 09 seconds East along the southerly line of said South Half of the Southeast
Quarter 1840.92 feet to the centerline of Stillwater Boulevard North~ thence North 34 degrees 51
minutes 17 seconds East along said centerline 1098.09 feet, more or less, to its intersection with
an easterly prolongation of the before described "Line A"; thence North 82 degrees 56 minutes 16
seconds West along said easterly prolongation of "Line A" 530.06 feet, more or less, to the point
of beginning.
Containing 38.14 acres, more or less, subject to the right-of-way of said Stillwater Boulevard
North, 62nd Street North and 60th Street North (a.k.a. Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 36).
Together with an easement for roadway purposes over, under and across all that part of said
South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 30 North, Range 20 West,
Washington County, Minnesota, which is encompassed by the following described lines, to wit:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half of the Southeast Quarter, thence South
89 degrees 25 minutes 16 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line thereof, 42.00
feet~ thence South 65 degrees 12 minutes 11 seconds East 214.95 feet; thence easterly along a
tangential curve, concave to the north, radius 1333.12 feet, central angle 01 degree 59 minutes 36
seconds, 46.38 feet to the point of beginning of the roadway easement being described; thence
continuing easterly along the last described 1333.12 foot radius curve, concave to the north,
central angle 02 degrees 52 minutes 17 seconds, 66.81 feet; thence South 30 degrees 14 minutes
.e
e
Sheet 2
44 seconds West, not tangent to said curve, 65.62 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve,
concave to the east, radius 161.94 feet, central angle 35 degrees 22 minutes 25 seconds, 99.98
feet; thence South 05 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds East, along tangent, 163.91 feet; thence
West 66.27 feet; thence North 05 degrees 07 minutes 41 seconds West 157.99 feet; thence
northerly along a tangential curve, concave to the east, radius 227. 94 feet, central angle 35
degrees 22 minutes 25 seconds, 140.73 feet; thence North 30 degrees 14 minutes 44 seconds East
along tangent 55.31 feet to the point of beginning.
All subject to and together with any other valid easements, reservations or restrictions.
Stack Land Surveying
9090 North Fairy Falls Road
Stillwater, MN 55082
tel: (612) 439-5630
..
e
e
\
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director V
DA: November 20, 1996
RE: OLD MAPLE ISLAND PLANT DEVELOPMENT
Main Stream Development Partnership has a contract to purchase the Maple Island
Plant from Maple Island Inc. The redevelopment strategy for the plant is to subdivide
the building into four (4) lots (three with building and one parking) and to sell two of the
four lots to other entities for development (Phase I). The remaining lot (building) would
be redeveloped at some time in the future (Phase II).
In order to accommodate the initial sale of Lots 1, 2 and 3, a 20 foot strip of land the city
owns on the west side of Water Street must be incorporated into the subdivision. This
20 foot strip was purchased as a part of the Burlington Northern land purchase in 1991
for purposes of assisting with the redevelopment of the Maple Island Plant.
It is recommended that the city trade the 'strip of land to the developer for public use of
the 46 car parking lot (old Maple Island Plant lot directly south of Mulberry Street) when
the lot is not needed or used by Phase I businesses. When Phase II proceeds, the city
can then determine what it will do with the remainder of the 20 foot strip of land.
The developer's are interested in finding a grocery store for the Phase II site.
Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare an agreement to trade with the developer's
the entire 20 foot city strip of land for use of parking lot use when not needed by the
project.
.:..,';"I'.i(:c:.
r:":\
~.~
cr.))
~~v
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUB/96-73
Planning Commission Date: November 18, 1996
Project Location: 219 North Main Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Central Business District
Zoning District: CBD
Applicant's Name: Mainstream Development Partnership
Type of Application: Variance
Project Description: Resubdivide six lots into four lots.
Discussion: The request is to resubdivide the existing Maple Island plant site (see
existing and proposed lot division from the existing six lots into four lots). The city
currently owns one of the lots that runs along Water Street. The approval is
conditioned upon the city selling or in some way transferring ownership of its parcel to
the subdivider. If that does not occur, the remaining five parcels could be resubdivided
into four with the city owned land remaining as one parcel owned by the city. The
subdivision would allow the sale of the property for ownership. A condition of approval
is that an overall development and parking plan for the entire site be prepared and
approved by the city before final approval of the subdivision.
Recommendation: Approval with conditions.
Conditions of Approval:
1. An overall development and parking plan for the entire site shall be presented to the
city for approval before final recording of the subdivision.
Attachments: Existing and proposed subdivision
CPC Action on 11-18-96: +4-1 approval. Details of 20' x 100' property transfer shall
be approved by the city.
,.
e
e,
I
e
e
\ ,-
"'
,
i
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i 6
i ~
i ~
i ;0;
i
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
I
i
j
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
. i
i
i
j
i
i
i
i
i
i
:: I~
~
J'tV\
\
l
j
l
.
~
133!US AW38lnn
I ~idt>))))>>))))~
~ I . i i
i ii,
~~I ~ 0\\\\\\\\1 I~ ~
~Ie ! ! !
,~ I ! I
a! ,
J! I
~ ,
!"
"
r--------------------,
i ' i:
, , I
I I '
Ii:
i j :
j j :
I :
I '
i '
i
j
i
j
i
i
j
i
i
i
i :
i '
,
i I
j .; .
i :
i :
j
i
j ,
i :
i :
j ,
,
j I
j:
i :
; :
i '
; :
i :
i :
j
I
Jii
IlIJi
,.~
z
~
'~ii ~
,~5 ~
.~ ."
i
~
~~
I~
1=
~~
~~
.
--v
1!I;t
i~
Ie;)
5
....
5 ~
I ~ ~
~
....
r-
o
.;;j
~ ~ L. t
'i! 31
!I: ! fi
~ I,
en
;a
r1
r1
....
a~ .... iill
i'p '-pi
I
I' ~
o ,-
~ ~!
:l!
I~q '~il~
!q~ lll' ~
"!il~ t.!."
. ~ ~ i
. Z
!'?
o ~
~~; ~
~ ~ DO
i
i
i
i
i
I I
i j
i i
i j
L_ _________~_J
~~
i ~ --...,
~
:>
....
'"
-v
:>
'" ~
;0;
~
~
z
e;)
~ ,--s;-
g ~ b~
~
~ ..... cr-. ~
~~ ~
'b t~~~ -0
~,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.,
,
I
,
,
,
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
, ,
· ::a I
, :!!: '
, 50 '
,0,
, i!; I
, ;a I
: ~ :
r ~ I
, .
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
I
,
,
,
She.t No. Project
MAPLE ISLAND MARKET
SO..,,, :~~..~~I~.;~~=:I... .SllLLWA~R,;
PARKING REQUIREMENlS - PHASE
StEFAN URSON
Revisions
Job No.
. MAINSTREAM
'; DeVElOPMENT.~', ....
PARTNERSHIP'
~
e
~eu-1'
9Tfl..~
e
~ ~w~ r^N'/
P:. f". ~G:t=S
I .
f' ,Ir ~ A-cG,asS'
r"ltJ^
'.
C. \1' '(
F~l'-~"
lAl"( Pt\F-l't~
\T~r
~ ~$Sn:3&
.
. '
-
~ ,,'
~... .
..
Wk~ co~T
C)
~-orF V ~& _L -
cQ
~
~
~
~
d
rlrN'lI'J e, ".
..
p
f-POf
. "
~
. .
S;;}:
-
r
~
--",'. .,
" . - . ,
S '. 'f;;}
.
~
&.,,' ,..... . r,/."
-
.
. ,
-
..
'"
.
,
-
~
~ 't
, .
~-
e..stp.'( et.ltJt..1
tt ~p w ~i ~ \lJe~:'f
c.
($, f.t>o It ~ Y
S~KktlC A;XONOt1~lc l";:.~( \J~
t1t'\l N S,T~eeT
l~M~
ST~
r
-w
I
,
I"
I
i.
Q'
~
. .. t.~~~i'. ". ~
..e'tt_'f"/
.~ .
'.--'- ,
".Z D..
::Ew-
<~:J:
W~C/)
a:: D..a:
--GW
'--,~'l,\).1 z
cn'~
zw....
->a:
<'w<
::EOn. .
-
c:.' ,'^.T'
="-~.. ti.< eo-
- ,..!n.-
--" :I!::,;:;
= i:i.i~.I' Co
....... ..~.a . -......
..... on
:;; -
, .
lid'
tr., :
.tl :','10,./"
. "':"~:'
finll~ I
flll',.~;:: I
-.*. .
N
.': ~" i'-5r;'~;",'~{~.;.
'I:<<'.":'~)'i;_
','::'","
'.~:;:,~.;i~/ ,
I;,., .
. .::~~.~
.El j~f' ~
.2;!~
t" ~;:h
'l-:l~:~;
ii;
""":::;-~~'f?i~,
wf~:l.
~li~:
a:~!'i'
<<t;;.
.~~.;c..~
i=t.:. ~
Zc d):.....'...';.......... ~
< Iii:Ji. 0
...J ~~,;. ~
UJ d):', .. ~
~Zi~\i
W <(Wi ~
...J r},' ~
" :t.".. 1: .
f ~ ~~I;:~ ~
.,...
IC
!C/)
e
IIII!II!; lii~ ~
N~O\~~;i!i\iil I ~2i 0
ii!g,...~~. >~ ~ ~ .."
~~i~~e~i~ ~I~ ~
~ij'~;S5 ~~;?:'
~i~:i~~~ I~~
~'" ~~ ~~ >~~
~B~"~", ;:;!~5i
5~i6i li~ ~~.
\:22~~ ~$D iN
~2g~ ~~ g'"'l
CI~l!l ~ i~ '" ~
~<=2g a.' 8 ~ ill
il"z:~ ~ 5~ ~.
~~~ ~ n~ . ~
::l ~ m2 la
~; ag a
~ ~ ~l" ~
- ~ z ~
~~ ~ Ii
;. ~
'"
~ M
~ !i
z:
~
~j8~j8j8j8~
~~=<~~~Dl
~~~~~~
~~~~!li!a
~~l~~~
j~il:a
~~~:~~
~a~!3~~
5~~1Il'
~p3~~~!!l
~~",P~~
~i"~~ ~
~ l"'Z! ~
2g ~?
'" '"
~ 2
~ .~
~ g
!i ~
." '"
~ ~
~ ~
::l
;Ii , i!5
~ 1:;
!
!3
e
'I .
~
2'-6"
46'-0"
CD
10'-S"
9'-S"
5'-4" 2'-S' 4'-8" 3'-4" 5'-4"
.."
5
o
;;u
."
r-
:>
:z
@
@
@
'~
......
I
/ I
~~ / i
~~ :
i/ ! ~~i
. - --. -" - - - .1- - -" -" -. - -~" -.
I , /'1
I I I
I , I
I I I
I I
I I
, I
I I
I I
I I
I ,
I I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i ~i
, -........... I
.-.-----~-1-.-.-,,----4-------------
I , I
I I I
, , ,
I I I
, I I
I I I
I I ~ I
I I ~ I
I I m I
~
'-
-....
~~
'"
-
..
.!!.
~
~,
;~
-<
~~
~~
",n
"'~
i~
~
~~
-<
I
~
~"
~~
~
.~.
'.
~
~
o
@
~
9'-6"
7' -4-
2'-8'" 2'-8- J'-4- 5'-4-
........
'"
i
El~
~fT1
";;r
~
}d~ 6
~~~.~~
~~~ CJ
~ 8
~ l5i
8 ~
l5i ~.
_ 0
o '"
..
~
~
~
'-
........
~
"'."
:r:r
jr4
~~
l .
~
-...........
4>-
~
~
~
fTI
ShNl No.
A2
I'19jIct Job No. ReviPlrw
MAPLE ISLAND MARKET ": Drown by
219 NORTH MAIN ST..' STILLWATER, MN ~.. '.'1,,1$,
1i\II2.,.,,''/' . ;t., ",. . ..,;. . Date;.,'..:.
HARDWARE STORE GROUND flOOR PLAN 14 NOV.l9ge'i~'::.",
...........
a.......,.
..eM'".... ~"e
~.t::E )\'/;;;,: ,',:~:<
MAINSTREAM
.ti,DEVEl.OPMENT...... ",
PARTNERSHIP .
e
e
~
46'-0.
o
;;0
o
o
...,
-0
..-
>-
z:
-
..
.
I
"'.
,
I
I
! i
! i
I ~
t I ~ I
I I I
I , I
--- ----------~----------~-------------
I I ,
I I I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I ~ I
! ! ~~ !
I I '" I
I I I
I I I
--- - - - - ----......-------------
I I I
I , '
I I I
I , ,
I I I
I I '
I I 51! I
I I i I
I I i I
I I ";;t I
I I ~ I
....
___ I ----------i----~-----~-------------
i .! 'OJe!
I I I i
I I , -4
I I I
I I ,
I I I
, , ,
I I I
l\I
,"
"":.
~
CD
~
""
z
o
~
~
~
...
~
_ Moo. ~~
.- Moo.
--
...... ..............-
~~:::::e...--
~..-........--
-..-
StEFAI URSa.
MAINSTREAM
/, DEVELOPMENT
RTNERSHle,~,
-," . > ~~~:.:,y~f~~'*<~ZJ,~..t:,?~~,;,i'ii:\':':',i;,:;;;~,,:: ,'<j,-,,'-tl
MAPLE ISLAND
AX' ~~~~14 MA,IN STILLWATER.
, .,. HARDWARE -
"r :':"~7~.':';~~~t~;:;:t:~:~!,:;~;~'i;
e
~
~
...,
r-
o
o
:;0
"'C
r-
>
Z
oIG'-o.
"'-0.
4'-2-
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--------ffi---------------.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
--------ffi---------------
I
I
,
I
,
I
I$>
,
I
,
J' -4.
,2'-0"
3'-4-
@
@
~
~
I
~
~
g'-6" 2'-8"
e
@
-...... -.,-
MAPLE ISLAND MARKET
A2.1.E.9 NORTH MAIN ST. STILLWATER, MN
'''v. [LQQft eLAN. :-. . NORTHERNY'NEY MDS...
> ':',;" ::.~::-',:~?;~r~;:~c~T> ;,' '::>-;:,- -':_1 -'_-'~: '_, ",_,c -; _:", (:;;_?\:,_ ,;: -::'~-'.;i<-,\"-;-""-~--,<:"'-/;;:""'~ '~-J",:~'
.-..... --
5 TmN URsal
-~--------- ---------
Gi
I c:
I::
!
;:;l
~
:z:
pl
~ ~
M
'"
.~ @ ~
J:
'O'-g" 4' " "'-0" '5'-0"
6 Islll~ "'U"'O""''';Z'''U% gZ~;r2~
~ l!n!n!l~~c>~~
tii Den D ~~:~~~~~ tlii~ g~
~ ;:;l ~~~~~Ul o _ ;:D:::! rr1
pl 1~":-I~~...Ul. ~~~~g ~
:!J12n !if o~2~tr:. :..:a
'" en . ~ilen a>c tIE ""5 i~~~ ~
!I: ~ ~8~~i zg"V~~~M~
2 ~il~'~en~g
'" ~~!S~.... ~p:z:1 ~
... "'!il"'~~ Da~~ ..
a ~~~:z:a i!Q- ;- 0
"" tii ~l! ~!Iai~~ ~1;~tli
~ a!il~~~ ai~;
D !i D ~ i ~ ~li ~ii8~~~S ~> :z:
-<"V en ;:;l~~
~~~aJ:l ij~~~ ~~ ~Zl{
en . ~ :z:~i5i ~~l'" !II -
"'~I ill i
ii! g ~ ~ :-I~; !,,~ji1
. ;0 i!3jg lX=<
~ l'l iiI<;;~ . ~ ~
... "V
~z~ P Z
~ ~?< lil P
~ ~
0
S ~
jIe "V
~ ~
2 ~ ~
i1 ~ ili
'"
~ '" ~
... .
'.......... ... ....... ...
.......... -_........--
......-....... ........
.----...-..... -....
.......-
...........
"......~.
At ......'".
---
..........
... .. ...
~~ ':;,~~ ;:j~,;:'~~'~.,l~~~.,~~~~cl E t ....
. s:o-... ...
T&
PIW' . ..,
104 NOV. ~ ."
.:'..::,~."-<,.-'.-',)"<. ,,' ..,', ',_:'<'~
~:':o,i/:,.:s,'+.i.;::}:,.:;;~./:t::::};,;;{ ''7~~~'.:~':1/: ,L~'1i:il;L ;
. ,.-'" 'C;':'::':''-'' ':-,~. ,,~ ,~.." ,,' '-', :",", ",','
".---',\-.<'-.."
-::::,::~:_(::~::;~~':<~;,;:lfi~~t6,:s~,,:.:;"~.
MAINSTREAM
DEVELOPMENT
. RARTNERSHIP.".
_:~,~n-Kl:~{:d~,tJ:i},:.;r':/'..' ,'~:'cr,:,{"-.,:)~:;.,._--";'~-, i: ': .';"
e
e
.
Vl
/'T1
(")
o
z
o
....,
r-
o
o
;;0
"'0
r-
>
z
46'-0"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, ,
I I
, '
_____________L__________L__________ '
, I
I I
, I
I I
, I
! tm~!
I ~ I
, '
I I
, ,
I I '
, I I
-------------I---------~----------
I ' I
I I '
, ' I
I I '
, ' I
I I '
I I I
! ! i
I I '
, I I
_____________~----------~---------- I
, '
I I
, '
I I
, '
I I
I I
I I
, '
I I
~
GI
en
~
!.
,
~
--------1r---------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
--------1r---------------
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
~
-- .r,---
,
-----~---------------
~
i
z:
!ll
f>
i>
~
~~~~~~
s::o!sss~
~ n~l;;Ui\G1
.....O,..,g:E
~~~i>,;~
;-<g;;jen!il
~~~~!5
, !II:!:l"'~
o~""o'"
:g~~:xo
l!5,.,r>~!!!
0!i\~~!2
Eii~815
pl-4"'Oc:!!!
C'!~i1ii1ll
gen'Pi>,;
i"'~g ""
;Tlz ~
!"~ ;;;
~ ~
n
,.,
o
~
~~~~~~~~
~~ssssx
1lIl;l~li\~~",~
:r~:;~EE~;;j
oi!~;-<""!">~
~g"~~~E~
~::I~Pl"r~
ci$lgo'oJ"en
i"li":g;:~~
-2!il,..,z.....g:J:z
cl~i'i.,cn~<
z!.a~o~~fi
~~~~~~~
cle1!11:~ i!5g
~~~8~~IB
<~Ei"';-<o~
fi.,,' :x ill
~!:ll!l ~::o!
iil~~ . n
<II 0
~z6 ~
o~n
~'i
en GI
:: ~
"
;;;
~
~~~~~ ~
~~~~~ ~
n ~ lE /'T1
~~!il~ ~
n;Tl~6
~Ei:;a~ ==
at 5 0
~pzl ~
ccl~~ ..
~18~
...,,,,
o 00
j;iO"x
~~:x;"
rz~ilI
6~~'
o z
i'lgl7i
""
~
"
~
6'-6"
8'-8"
6'
8'-11"
9'-4"
4'-0" 2'-6"
!i\
"
~
g
en
("I
46'-0":
~
U>
;;j
~
2
ill
cl
,.,
!II:
z:
z
_No.
........--.. .......-
=-=-:\::. -:-::'........
.----...-.... ~ fill"
.......-
-.-
..........
..............
..,..........
..........
, .... ....t
A 3.1
:x
.,
i>,;
i
~
i>,; ~
I
......-
--
MAPLE ISLAND MARKET
219 NOF<IH MAIN ST. STILLWATER, MN
0.-"'"
T&
_.-
STEFAN LARSOI
MAINSTREAM
DEVELOPMENT
.~~I~,,#
~;-~:-::;-'
^, - -~~,:';~~:ri:,:;:.7f-~,~:f~~<'t. c.;':'
" .~:;:<'-'
~,,,: .'.
D."
NO. YINEYARDS :', ..;;'<, 14, NOV. 1996 ".'," "
,;.' ,.' :'/'i",^'~'!{~';: Jth~ ~';:\' ~:.0~::::,~;, ~"~~" ~:>: ':~r,r;:f;:;;; ,
~;l{?'~
"'.
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
--
,:",:::<.,.-.,
,.....-.-:y.,..'
:1;j::t~~'~f~;;!i:~j~_'J~~J2~:t,'
.
e
, '
-.,
.
... ...
:z =e
0 IT1
:;:0 Vl
-l -l
:::I:
IT1 IT1
r-
r- IT1
IT1 <
< >
> -l
::::I 5
0 :z
:z
""t1 ""t1
:::I:
:::I: ~
~
IT1 IT1
0 " 0
:z
:z I ~ Ii IT1
IT1
1
... I , ~ ...
... ...
... I.. N
.!. .!.
~ ! ~
[[J
[[]
[JJ
~
;
[!J
~ ~
, ,
/ ,
,
f ...
~ -
01
I ...
~ ~
~
I
( !g ~
==
7" ;;! i ==
11 =
~ I =
======
"""""'" j =
... =
~ ===
=B
.- ===1
p=~
I I
I ~
1- ~
= '"
= ~
===
DIJ ~
~
'"
0
:z:
'"
I
DO -
I
DO
DIJ
DO
00
[[]
[][]
------
-~
!
~
Ii
~
7"
i
I
I
i
I
i
!
L___
""t1
:::I:
>
Vl
IT1
o
:z ,-
...
...
N
.
I
q
I
I
IT1
~
-l
IT1
r-
IT1
<
>
-l
5
:z
..---
-
.---
I
'--
~
~
'"
~
-- - i""- Fi E3J ~ ."
~ x
I i iil
I J !i!
I '"
s !Ii
I 7"
3--J
---
.
I ~ (
I
i J I
Ii .J
~
I I
=...-,.-
-
!Ii
l"
I
~
II
--
StEfAN URSOl
MAINSTREAM
DEVELOPMENT
ARTNERSHIf>>.
-Jo<:l
MAPLE ISLAND MARKET
219 NOIWi MAIN S1. SlIlLWATER. MN
A4
""..
rXTERIOR n EVATIONS - PHASE ONE
~
.......-
-'-
PN... b!I
T&
....... --............
,...........-_........-
...................,_.....
.......... ....... ..... ...""...
-..-
.......-.-
........~.
....".."..
..t.~""
.......,.P
... .....
>':';i:'t:.}'f:<.',i,;.lt.~.;
<<}::';-')i;~'- '_,'
. << - ,
e
e
I
l*""."
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: November 14, 1996
RE: ZONING AMENDMENT DEFINING HOME OCCUPATION AND AMENDING
THE SINGLE FAMILY, R-A AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL, R-B
REGULATIONS TO ALLOW TYPE I & II HOME OCCUPATION USE
PERMITS. CASE NO. ZAT/96-4, CITY OF STILLWATER, APPLICANT.
Background
At previous planning commission meetings, the subject of tightening up the regulations allowing
commercial uses in residential districts was discussed.
The proposed regulations illuminates neighborhood commercial uses in residential districts,
defines Type I and II home occupation use permits and provides standards for those uses. Past
practice was for city staff to use standards similar to those proposed in reviewing home
occupation use permit requests. By amending the ordinance as proposed, the standard will be
written out and more easily referred to by staff and the applicant.
The commission may want to consider allowing Type I home occupation use permits in
residential districts as permitted uses. As proposed, Type I and II would require a special use
permit in the RA District and Type II require a special use permit in the R-B District only.
A new neighborhood commercial district will be developed to apply to existing commercial uses
in residential districts that become nonconforming because of this change. This is a public
hearing.
Recommendation: Review and recommend approval of amendment to'the city council.
Attachment: Home occupation use permit ordinance amendment.
CPC Action on 11-18-96: +5-0 approval
. ~ l
e
The city is hereby divided into Use Districts which shall be known as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
RA - One Family Districts
RB - Two Family Districts
RCL - Low Density Multiple Family Residence District
RCM - Medium Density Multiple Family Residence District
RCH - High Density Multiple Family Residence District
CA - General Commercial
CBD - Central Business District
P A - Public Administrative Office District
BP-C Business Park - Commercial District
BP-O Business Park - Office District
BP-I Business Park - Industrial
FP - Flood Plain Overlay District
BS - BlufflandlShoreland Overlay District
Subd. 11. RA ONE FAMILY DISTRICTS.
1. Permitted Buildings and Uses. In a One Family District, the following buildings and uses
and their accessory buildings and uses are permitted:
a. Dwelling houses, each occupied by not more than one family.
b. Parks and playgrounds.
c. Type I Home Occupation Use Permits.
2. Permitted Uses with Special Use Permits for the Council. In a One Family District, the
following buildings and uses and their accessory buildings and uses may be permitted by
special use permit from the Council:
a. Hospitals, nursing homes and resthomes.
b. Public and private primary and secondary schools including accessory buildings and uses
located upon property contiguous to that occupied by the main building or buildings.
c. Cemeteries.
d. Churches and other plaqes of worship.
e. Within a mMn bttildiftg, the office of a 3tIl'geon, pkysieifm, clergymen, ftfehitcet, engineer,
attomcy, similftf professional person or licensed persol'lftl service practitiofter who resides
in the main btJ:i.lding and employs in the office not mol'C than. one noftfCsidcnt offiee or
laboratory 6;3sistant.
e Newe. Type II Home Occupation Use Permits.
.
, .
f. Otftereommerdal tl3eS foUftd n:ot to be objeetionflble to the neighborhood in which thcy
arc proposed to located.
e
3. Accessory Uses. Uses and buildings incidental to permitted or special permitted uses shall be
subject to the following regulations:
a. The maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings including attached and detached
private garages and other accessory buildings shall be 1,000 square feet or 10 percent of
the lot area whichever is less.
b. The total ground coverage of the accessory building or buildings shall not exceed the
ground coverage of the principal building.
c. No more than two accessory buildings, one private garage and one other accessory
building, 120 square feet maximum, shall be located on a residential premises.
d. An accessory building shall not be designed or used for human habitation, business or
industrial accessory use.
4. Development Regulations.
a. Area, Setbacks and Height Regulations:
PROVISION
1. Maximum Building Height:
Main Building
Accessory Building
2. Minimum Lot Area
3. Minimum Lot Width
4. Minimum Lot Depth
5. Maximum Lot Coverage
6. Minimum Yard Requirements:
Front Yard
Side Yard
Corner Lot Street Side Yard
Rear Yard
7. Frontage Requirements
SINGLE FAMILY
2-112 stories and 35 feet
1 story - 20 feet
10,000 sq. feet.
75 feet
100 feet
30%
30 feet
10 feet
30 feet
25 feet
At least 25 feet on an improved
public street.
/
e
JIA, , .
b. Exceptions:
e
1. Front Yard. Where a uniform front yard setback exists which is less than 30 feet, any
building or structure hereafter erected, structurally altered or enlarged may conform to
the established setback but in no case a setback of less than 20 feet be allowed.
2. Front Yard. Where a uniform front yard setback does not exist, the minimum
required setback shall be the average of the setback of the two adjacent main
buildings; or if there is only one adjacent main building, the setback of the main
building shall govern, but in no case shall a setback less then 20 feet be allowed or
greater than 30 feet be required.
3. Comer Yard. For comer lots where the comer side yard setback or front yard setback
for the main building on the adjacent lot on the same street is less than the required
setbacks, the comer lot setback for the adjacent main building shall govern, but in no
case shall a setback of less than twenty feet be allowed.
4. Side Yard. When there is an attached garage on one side of the dwelling, the garage
setback is 5 feet provided that no habitable floor area is closer than 10 feet from the
property line and provided that the garage is a minimum of 15 feet from the nearest
structure on the adjacent lot.
5. Side and Rear Yard. An accessory structure located entirely in the side yard at least 6
feet from the main building shall have a minimum side and rear yard setback of 5
feet.
Subd. 12. RB TWO FAMILY DISTRICTS.
1. Permitted Buildings and Uses. In a Two Family District the following buildings and uses
and their accessory buildings and uses are permitted:
a. All buildings and uses permitted in a One Family District as set forth in Subd. 11 (1).
b. Dwelling houses, each occupied by not more than two families.
c. CtlStomary hemc oecupations carricd on for gam in the main bl:1ildmg, l'f6vided that ft6
ft6Mcsidcllt help is cmployed for the pttrp6se, ft6 more than. 25 pereellt ofthc total floor
spacc of the building is used for the p1:11'p6SC, no artidcs 6ffered far sale shall bc
digpla)'ed so as t6 bc w/isibk Ham any street 8:ftd amy artieles mack UpOIl the premises
shaH bc sold ar offered for sale thercon.
New c. Type I Home Occupation Use Permits.
e
2. Permitted Uses with Special Use Permits. In a Two-Family District, the following buildings
and uses and their accessory buildings and uses may be permitted by special use permit from
<__",:""",.~"..~.- .....~.c .. _,,-, _' ",._...".~ : :'<'o1'~/""'"","~";...t:-":>"-~,,,~,,~,, -.':._' -.;. '-:",~.' "~,':Ci.~ '''''''_'':'':'', .~- >." _~....:-O-"<;:'Jt>_...;.;,,' '~'_.,.,::_;,"'
., .--..
the Council:
a. All btrilding 8ftd tlsesl'ermitted by gpcdal permit in a One Family District ag set forth in
Stlbd. 11 (2).
e
New a. Type II Home Occupation Use Permits.
b. Local retail btl1ines3es, of the "comer store" \'8riety, normally reqttircd for the daily needs
of the residents of the locality, stich ag establisftmcftts for sale of dairy l'l'6dt1ets,
delieaocssen, frtIits, vegetables, greceries, meats and other eOn"lenience items, l'l'6vidcd
that provision be mack for loading gpaee.
e. (b.) Multi-Family Dwellings.
d. (c.) Bed and Breakfast establishments. SEE CHAPTER 31.01 SUBD. 25(1)(f).
3. Accessory Uses. Uses and buildings incidental to permitted or special permitted uses shall be
subject to the following regulations:
a. The maximum lot coverage of all accessory buildings including attached and detached
private garages and other accessory buildings shall be 1,000 square feet or 10 percent of
the lot area whichever is less.
~
b. The total ground coverage of the accessory building or buildings shall not exceed the
ground coverage of the principal building.
c. No more than two accessory buildings, one private garage and one other accessory
buildings, 120 square feet maximum, shall be located on a residential premises.
d. An accessory building shall not be designed or used for human habitation, business or
industrial accessory use.
4. Development Regulations:
a. Area, Setbacks and Height Regulations:
Single Family
Duplex
Multifamily
1. Maximum Building Height:
-
. ..
"
Defmitions . , 'L4.- t' ~
A I f~~
... Home Occupation - all occupations, professions, activities or uses carried out by a resident with I
the interest of economic gain ap.d which is conducted as an accessory use in the residents
dwelling unit or accessory structure on the premises.
Resident - an individual whose principle plan of living and sleeping is in a particular location is a
resident of that location.
TYPE I HOME OCCUPATION
1. The following standards are applicable to all Type I Home Occupations:
a. No person other than residents of the dwelling unit on the subject premises named in
the application shall be engaged In such home occupation.
b. No more than twenty (20) percent of the total gross floor area of the said dwelling
unit shall be Used for such home occupation.
c. No outdoor storage or display of products, equipment, or merchandise Is permitted.
d. No retail sales shall be conducted on the premises.
.
e. No publication or advertising shall use the residential address of the home occupation.
f. Exterior evidence of the conduct of a home occupation is not permitted.
g. The home occupation shall be conducted exclusively within the dwelling unit or
accessory structure.
h. No equipment process or activity shall be used in such home occupation which
creates noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical or television interference
which is detectable to the normal senses outside the dwelling unit or accessory
structure.
1. No traffic shall be anticipated by a home occupation in substantially greater volumes
than would normally be expected by one (1) dwelling unit in a residential
neighborhood. No vehicle or delivery truck shall block or interfere with normal
traffic circulation.
J. No specific outside entrance or exit for the home occupation shall be permitted.
k. No sign shall be permitted.
Ie
1
........:...#.#..--.....-;;:-. ....--:'"-.~~.;-,.~#~'
k _ . ~ . " ".
, ; ~:' , : -. '" .~
, ...."':"....
~~
-
1. No use, storage or parking of tractor trailers, semi-trucks or heavy equipment (e.g.
construction equipment) shall be permitted on or about the premises.
e
2. The following uses are examples of home occupations which may be classified as a Type I:
a. Telephone answering and solicitation
b. Home crafts
c. Computer programming, desktop publishing
d. Typing or secretarial service
e. Painting, sculpturing or writing
f. Dressmaking, sewing or tailoring
g. Drafting, surveying service
h. Consulting services
i. Mail order business, not including retail sales from site
J. Sales representative, office only
TYPE II HOME OCCUPATION
1. The following standards are applicable to all Type II Home Occupations:
a. One (1) person other than the residents of the dwelling unit on the subject premises
named in the application may be engaged in s:uch home occupation
b. No more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total gross floor area of the dwelling unit
shall be used for such home occupation
.
c. No outdoor storage or display of products, equipment or merchandise is permitted.
d. Retail sales are permitted only as an access use to the primary home occupation (e.g.
beauty salon can sell shampoo and beauty products).
e. Exterior evidence of the conduct of a home occupation is not permitted except one (1)
non-illuminated sign not to exceed eight (8) square feet, which must be mounted flat
against the exterior wall of the dwelling unit.
f. The home occupation shall be conducted exclusively within the dwelling unit or an
accessory structure.
g. No equipment, process or activity shall be used in a home occupation which creates noise
vibration, glare, fumes, odors, or electrical or television interference which is detectable
to the normal senses outside the dwelling unit or accessory structure.
h. No traffic shall be anticipated by a occupation in substantially greater volume than would
2
e
'.'>'<"'--~----'--""-
._._-':'.J--~.:=e...::...::A.';.:,o-"'::"";':'",,,;:~,:,~ ;;;';',"":" .
,...._i:"~,~,,;.-...."
~ ..-
.
normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. No vehicle or delivery truck shall
block or interfere with normal traffic circulation.
1. A Minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces, in addition to those required for the
dwelling unit, shall be provided for use by patrons of the home occupation. The Board of
Zoning Appeals may require additional off-street parking based upon the use and location
of the property.
/
J. No use, storage, or parking of tractor trailers, semi-trucks or heavy equipment (e.g.
construction equipment) shall be permitted on or about the premises.
2. The following uses are examples of home occupations which may be classified as a Type II:
a. Attorney Office
b. Insurance sales or broker
c. Real estate sales or broker
d. Jewelry repair
e. Shoe repair \
f. Carpentry, cabinet makers
g. Ceramics which involve the use of a kiln
h. Medical or dental office
1. Catering or food preparation
. . j. Pet grooming service
k. Barber or beauty shop
1. Photo developing, photo studio
m. Appliance repair facility
GENERAL PROVISIONS - All home occupations shall conform to the following standards:
1. Approval of a home occupation is not transferable to a location other than that which was
approved.
. 2. In no case shall a home occupation be open to the public at times earlier than 7:00 a.m. nor
later than 9:00 P.M.
3. All home occupations shall be subject to periodic Inspections. Reasonable notice shall be
provided to the permittee prior to the time requested for an Inspection.
4. The Executive Director, In the case of an Administrative Permit for a Type I Home
Occupation, or the Board of Zoning Appeals In the case of a Conditional Use Permit for a
Type II Home Occupation, may Impose reasonable conditions necessary to protect the public
health, safety and welfare or to protect against a possible nuisance condition.
I.
3
. ~.~:'L'~';:~-:....,""~..:~r"'~~.''',~;, ,:""--,-,.",,,,:"~_,.,n.
,..,.-,...
. ..-~
5. Conditional Use Permits may be revoked by the issuing authority for cause after reasonable
notice to the permittee and opportunity for a hearing on the matter.
6. Home occupation shall commence only after the receipt of a conditional use permit if
das'tit'leQ as a Type l; erC~if classified as a Type II.
4
.~:,~.....,....-,
~,:"t:~ "~" :~~iitf;~::.
.;~.,...
-- -'lo
.
.
.
#" . -~ ,. t:
,
MEMORANDUM
~;.~.~)
'~'.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Allen Zepper, Building Official er
DA: November 14,1996 .
RE: LETTER FROM SUSAN F. SABONGI
~
It appears Ms. Sabongi is in concurrence to install a fire suppression system in the old
Central Bank building.
In her letter she has questions concerning 226 South Main Street. Neither the Fire
Chief nor I were aware she had moved in there. As per her request confirming 226
South Main Street does not require fire suppression system, that is not possible. If she
sells to someone who opens an antique shop or retail sales, it would not have to be
sprinkled, if however, she sells to someone who opens an office, sandwhich shop
barbershop, etc., then it would be a change of occupancy. Again, it would not be
possible to determine if it would have to be sprin~led until we can determine the
proposed occupancy.
. .
'-
.:......;.:.:-:~~-:::-:.:.,;:-::..._-- ~..;,,_..,;.;.~:;;:..a:,;~.i'~,. ..
'.- . - --,'..::- .-'.
.'- '\. " '_~III"'.:::a.~'.- .'
~
)}~a
~-.
S'l1LLW.9LPE9(.9Lg{'I1Qf{1'ES' ",
226 S. Main Street. . Stillwater. MN.55082
.... I....:
lll'i~\l' 1 '~.J. III,'
11.1 NOV. -~8. &8'.,.
. !:I ,".. ,I
, '\1 ---~~..--=..~~
, 'Ii~'&r~~ ._I'j}Il.,....G~.;t:_,,~
Tel 1 -
,
'" . ... .
"
. : .~~..:... ~.: .~.~ :. ...., .-:; '.~~ .'~
','-': ."
Nov 3rd1996.'.
Mr. Nile L. Kriesel.
City Coordinator.
City Hall,
216 North 4th Street.
Stillwater.' Minnesota. 55082.
/
Dear Mr. Kriesel.
Thank you for your letter of October 31 st 1996 informing me that
the City Council had considered and rejected our request for
financial 'assistance for building improvements as required by the
City, to the Central Bank building at 101 South Main S1. and also to
226 South Main St.. the current location of' Stillwater Antiques. .
Since we "were .not informed that this request was' to be discussed by ,
. the Council at'lheirmeeting. on October .29th ~ 1996, I confirin my
request that this matter be place4 on the agenda for the meeting of
December 3rd 1996. Futhermore' 1. would request that the Council
give consideration to the following information" in. support of .my
request . and in response to the reports . p.resented by Mr. Russell and
Mr. Zepper. ' . .- ."
. -', ; ..:' ~ :-'. .~
Mr. Russell confirmed in his memo dated Oct. 24th 1996, that the City
did in fact offer - financial assistance toward the rennovation of the S.'
Main St.. Simonet store to _encourage them to remain downtown and
. when Simonets chose not to stay they were required to install . a
sprinkler system before they could lease the building. The expense of
which finacially impacted Simonet's as such that to make their new
project possible, the City compensated by reducing the cost of the
land needed for the project and by doing so the City indirectly
reimbursed the cost impacted by the installation of the sprinkler
system at the Main St. store.
.-
We are thus respectfully requesting the same consideration to make
our new business project possible. In order to remain competitive
with other Antique Malls in downtown Stillwater our business plan
includes the installation of a mezzanine thus providing a second floor
'":'':'~''.:h''''''' ',.r.);:;' '.:'._;_~-
. ... . i .. .~. '.
-~......-,.~\"':.#.:..:'~....~",,"'-'" --...-.- . _...~,~~~
",.:.;",;,~::"...
..
"'
".:-- .i
.: "..'and bringing: 'the building in comparison to 'our";corripetitors '\vhoall
. - ."-. offer a second floor for Antique Dealers.' ~ This addit~onal square
footage enables us to bring in more income for .the same foundation
size' and overhead costs, thus enabling us to remain competative . with
other malls. .
The cos't of the installation of a sprinkler system so severly impacts
us we are not able to proceed with this project, consequently our
competetive cost of doing business is adversely affected. We are
therefore in a somewhat similar position as was Simonet's and in
order to proceed with our business plans we are seeking the support
of the city. We offer to finance the installation of a sprinkler system
if the City will consider reimbursing us a sum of approx $30,000 so
that we may proceed with improvements essential to the success of
our business.
As I previously stated we have been in business in Stillwater since
1991 and have spent many thousands of our personal; dollars
renovating and decorating .both 501 N. Main St. and 226 S. Main St. to
support and cooperate with the City, we now want to further develop
our business. to the benefit of. the downtown area and are seeking
the cooperation of the City as we have. so . willing shown over the.:
years. . ..'
In my request I also referred to our property at 226.S Main S1. which
is now available for lease. Whilst no reference' was made specifically
to this building by neither Mr. Russell or Mr. Zepper, it is my
understanding from Mr. Zepper's letter explaining the exeI1.1ption of a
. sprinkler system in the building now occuppied by Kmitsch Girls, he
states that since there were two retail outlets moved out and two
retail outlets moved in, there was not a change in occupancy, this
suggests therefore that the same circumstance will also apply to our
retail business at 226. S. Main S1. since as we move our retail
business out, another retail business will move in this will not reflect
a change in occupancy.
I respectfully request confirmation from the City that the property of
226. S. Main S1. does not require a sprinkler system, thus our request
for financial assistance for the improvements to this property will no
longer be necessary.
I thank you for your time and consideration.
sincerely to
~~~O"(f;(\ .
Sus~~ Sa~gi.
Owner and Manager Stillwater Antiques.
" ". " "f
,
...,:';';::'"
- .e
e
"
. .
...-.
MEMORANDUM
~
,'e
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Allen O. Zepper, Building Official
DATE:
October 25, 1996
J\~/
SUBJECT: Susan Sabongi Concerns Regarding City Sprinkling Enforcement Policies
The City adopted Appendix E, an appendix chapter to the Minnesota State Building Code in the mid
1980's. This requirement became Chapter 1306 of the Minnesota State Building Code with the
adoption of the 1994 edition.
Several buildings have been remodeled, enlarged or have had occupancies changed. Some of these
are Brines, Sebastain Joe's (Winona Woolen Mills), Outfitters, Simonet warehouse, Vittorio's,
Johnny's TV, Main Street Square, Kolliner's building, Sandy Hudson's building, the old Coast to
Coast store, City Hall, 217 N. 2nd Street, Simonet Furniture, the old UBC Building, among others.
These were all required to be sprinkled. This is a common practice, as well as state code and city
ordinance.
To answer the specifics about the Janda building, there was one business in the main store (Martins).
This later became an antique dealer and to our knowledge, one person ran the entire shop. In
addition, the shoe store was in the small part on the south side. When the antique shop left, Kmitsch
Girls occupied the main and second floor and someone else occupies the small shop on the south
side. There has been no occupancy changes since two retail outlets moved out and two retail outlets
moved in. There was no remodeling or expansion so we could not require a fire suppression system
be installed. A different situation arises when we consider the old Simonet Furniture store. This
is a case of one retail outlet. When the new owner came in, he rented out small areas to various
vendors, similar to what a shopping mall would do except without divider walls. Subsequently, it
went from one retailer to many retailers, which constitutes a change of occupancy which required
a fire suppression system.
..
I believe we have a similar situation with the Central Banle It is presently a banking facility with
offices. It is going to become an antique mall, therefore; it is going from a B occupancy to a M
occupancy, which according to Chapter 1306, a fire suppression system is required.
. ......._.-~_._..--.-..-~.._--._---~._--.~--.~-_._..
.u.o;_.;-._~....;..;.~~.......z.~~~";_'-""'_""""";''--'~'
oj,
.~
MEMORANDUM
.----...
''-#T....''i~~1.
ti1tJji
TO~ Mayor and City Council
FR:
Steve Russell, Community Develop~en.t Dire.c1c:.tt10r j<
Oclober24, 1996 .. ~~_.
RESPONSE TO SUSAN SABONGI LETTER DATED 10-19-6 REGARDING
CITY ASSISTANCE FOR SPRINKLERS
DA:
RE:
Attached is a letter from Susan Sabongi, prospective purchaser of the Downtown
Central Sank building. The letter is requesting city assistance to help with installation of
a building sprinkler system. The letter refers to the old Simonet Furniture building and
the assistance Simonet's received when moving to the business park. The assistance
Simonet's received went toward reducing the cost of the land to make the new
Simonet's project possible. The TIF assistance was not for downtown sprinklers.
When the city was trying to convince Simonet's to stay downtown, the city mentioned
providing assistance for the renovation of the downtown Simonet's store. This
.:?kc. alternative, needless to say, wasn't selected by Simonet's. When the building changed
hands sprinklers were required by the citY;
The point raised in the letter regarding application of the sprinkler regulations to
Kmitsch Girls will be addressed in a separate memo by the building official.
:";.":,,:,,,:,,","~.,:"~''''
... _ ,__~-=,::::---..'~~~';"~~~~~.J.-.:..t~_.~~._
--.-.-. . ":'_'..::!;~~. ~
,.
. ,
e
e
~:;t
.
t' , ..
b\
.
.-
(Z.'):
-~.
~ \"
",-j:
S'I1L.LW.9tPE!1(JlL9{?JQtz1PS.,""i. ~
. ,."". '. ,I,." . : .._ .. '._' - ..... '.:... ..' ,.".. . '.~. '.~.' . . "
226 So. Main Streeet, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
"Tel: (612)768-9115
For the attention of:-
Mr. Jay Kimble -;~. "
The Mayor of The Stillwater City.
~ .. _""1, . '"
The City Council Members.
City of Stillwater,
216 NAth St.
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
October 19th 1996.
~.
Ref: Request for financial reimbursment to support the cost for the installation of
sprinkler systems under the city requirement. _
We have recently entered into an agreement to purchase the Central Bank
Building at 101 South Main Street, Stillwater, in order that we can expand our
retail antiques business and provide to our customers, our dealers and the
visitors to Stillwater an up-to-date Antiques Mall that would be a cente"r piece to
the city and better meet the needs of the community and further attract more
'visitors to this wonderful city. . "
However, our competitive cost of doing business in this city have been
\ adversely and severly impacted due to the current city requirement for the
installation of a fire sprinkler system. "
In addition, this sprinkler requirement makes it financial prohibitive for us to
lease our current property at 226 So. Main, St. since the projected annual
lease income for the first 2 years is totally wiped out by the estimated cost of
installing the sprinkler system now required.
The current costs to meet the city requirements and install the complete system
to both properties, including the hook up to the outside street mains, road
repairs, monitoring systems and permits is estimated between $45-$50,000.
We have been in business in Stillwater since 1991 and have spent many
thousands of personal dollars renovating and decorating both 501 N. Main St.
and later 226. S. Main St. and in support and compliance with the City of
Stillwater efforts to visually improve the older buildings of Downtown, both
locations have received major improvements.
We have learned that the city has reimbursed the owners of the Simonet
building on So.Main St. a $ amount equal to the total cost for installing the
sprinkler system in that building (which currently houses a competitive antiques
.,'t:..
. .
-.
~.
;"'::-:'-'7..-:~.-~:-::~::-:::~':'.:~'~===..-=---. ~ :~~"_"::"--,,:,"l~'- .-:~_._.-..
:.....-.......~,. ."
~ -~~f'';::;
....._~,,---~~-"-"'..'>~~~;:,.:..;;.
~.
..
",. 'I ft, .'"
mall business). We have also lear'ned that 214 So. Main St. was remodeled
and is open to a new vendor , 'Kmitsch Girls'this busineSs does not have a >
sprinkler system even though the property has new tenants and the building
far exceeds the 2000 sq ft exemption limit.
/'.~
'.~:e
The severe increase to the set up cost of starting our new business and the
leasing of our current property, severly prohibits us from remaining viable and
competetive with other Main S1. retailers offering similar business opportunities
to Antique Dealers and service to customers.
Based on the above precedants, we repectfully request the reimbursement of
these major costs in order that we may meet city requirements and can function
financially and remain in business in Stillwater.
We would be pleased to discuss the matter further for any clarification and
provide documents supporting the anticipated costs.
Sincerely I
~\ocf)o;
Susan Sabongi
Owner and Manager Stillwater Antiques.
. ,
-":.'- .
-.
,
.'-C:~
.,{f-5fJ,
~
-
-------,....-.-...-.....-.~~---.,-:............:...,i;.:~~~-..::!-.-:-.....:../-....~~.-.~ ...~ -:.".:;..-- -_.
-
-
CITY OF STILL WATER
Memorandum
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
Date:
November 27, 1996
Subject:
AUAR contract
UnfInished Business Item No.2
A draft copy of the contract for the AUAR is currently under review by staff. Copies will be
provided Council at the Tuesday, December 3 meeting.
.
e
e
M E M 0 R A'N DUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
rV
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: November 21, 1996
RE: SURFACE USE OF lONG LAKE
The Long Lake Association was recently before the Parks Commission and Planning
Commission to discuss their concern for condition and use of Long Lake. Of particular
concern is the use of motor craft on Long Lake. This will probably be a volatile issue.
It is recommended that the Parks Commission and Planning Commission hold a joint
public hearing on Long Lake surface water use and after the hearing make a
recommendation to the City Council for consideration.
Recommendation: Refer surface water use issue to Parks Commission and Planning
Commission for a public hearing and recommendation on.
J
-.-.-,'" ~
~--""~..;.,If..,...,:~.,ltJ!...:1H'<t.'~;:;..,:t.~:"ji.~:J;'~~<"':;;'''''''-~.i,''_;~~'<'',;l"; ;., ,.,," ;;;..~:...:,~
-,
-
MEMORANDUM
To:
Mayor and City Council
Sue Fitzgerald, City Planner
From:
Date:
November 26, 1996
Re:
McKusick Lake Master Plan
As part of the continuous implementation of the Comprehensive Plan, city staff is
requesting approval of attached consultant services for a master plan for the McKusick
Lake area. The plan will include connecting a trail system to the citywide trailway and a
possible wildlife observation area for students. Funding for the project was allocated in
the 1996 budget.
The Park and Recreation Commission endorsed the above request at their November
25, 1996 meeting. The Commission will be involved with plan review and approvals.
."------=:.:..:~,......._,,~~..r--~.........~;;.ili.:.,~~,i...;:....,;,!' ,..,;.'~:~~",',A;'i;"';-.:''''';:'.'.'_',.,'t.:..,,
e
November 26, 1996
Ms. Sue Fitzgerald
City Planner
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Re Lake McKusick Area Pl"oject - Stillwater MN
Dear Sue,
I am pleased to submit this proposal to provide landscape architectural services for the
n'u\Ster plan for Stillwater.
Geller\tHy, the project will include approximately 200 acre (nct) area (see attached location map) of
the Lake McKusick Area Project in Stillwater, Minnesota. The scope of services will include Prc~
S{~hcmatic Planning, Schematic Planning and Master Pbmning. I assume that you as the City
Planner of the City of Stillwater will be the pers5>n with whom I will coordinate, preRent
infonnauon and receive db:ection from concerning this project.
In planning this project, I will do the following:
Phase I . Pre-Schematic Planning (Data Base and Program) - This phase ent\lls
gathering of existing base information, data, required test~ (ifany), surveys,reports and project
area and direction, all to be furnished by the City; necessary research and field reconnaissance to
document the site with notes. photos andlOl" sketches; coordination with City Planner and other
stiff; and CitylIllterCsted Party interview to confinn the City's pl'ogt'am (the project direction is to
be provided by the City through a formal meeting). A preliminary Project Program will be drafted
and presented to the City Planner.
Pbase II . Schematic Plan (Synthesis, Goals/Objectives and Concepts) · This phase
entails continued research, coordination, and synthesis of the City's Program and site area;
development of broad goals and objectives; and the preparation of preliminary schematic (concept)
approaches. including preliminary site analysis, site detcl1ninant.~, character sketch plans, sections
and sketches to be presented to the City Planner and the Park and Recreation Commission for
rev1.cw and comment.
ie
Phase III . Master Plan . This phase entails the continued research, coordination. and
development of a selected concept; the dcvelopl'llent of a pr~Uminat}' (sketch) master plan,
includIng sketch character plans I section~ / sketches and a brief (10-15 page) $Umnlary report
undJor guide to development which outlines she and architectural character as well a.~ phasing. The
report will include implementation strategies and pl'eHminary budget planning. The draft master
plan will be presented to the City Planner and the Park and Recreation Commission for review and
comment, A final master plan and report will be presented to the City Council for consideration
and adoption.
herb batdwin landscape architect 4196 west 18Sth street jordan minnesota 55352
612 492-2180
e
Meetings- Attend infonnal meetings with the City Planner and other staff, FOl'01al meetings will
be limited to one meeting with d'e CitylInterestcd Pal'ties during Phase T; one meeting with the Park
and Recreation Commission during Phase II; and one meeting with the Park and Recreation
('()lTImission and one meeting with the City Coullcil during Phase III. A limit of 32 hours for all
formal mcctings is included in this proposal. All infonnal and formal meetings include
prcpanltionj travel and presentation time.
Expenses- One reproducible copy of presentatioll material for e~\ch phase will be provided to the
City as p:l.l1 of this proposal.. All othcI' rcimbUl'sable expenses sllch as mileage, photocopy, LD
phone, pl'inting and consultants fees (if required and approved by tJle City) wjJl be charged to the
('i ty at cost. Othcr expenses beyond the scope of this proposal will be charg~d extra,
Based on an analysis of the work required, I estimate that this pl'Ojcct can be completed for a fee as
scheduled below:
Phase I . Pre Sch~ml\ti<: Planhing
l'hn~e II . Schematic Plllnning
Phase III . MUtSter Plnn
$ 3,500
$ S,OOO
$ 7,000
l\fc('tings (32 lJouJ;'s Indudcd in cost or ph,.ses above)
SUB TOTA I"
$15,500
-"'"
1<:" pc nl'i.cs
CQst estim~lted to be $ "800
TOTAl"
$16,300
Statements will be sent monthly for work accomplished, payable within 30 days,
e
Pk'-\sc note that this proposal docs not include Clttra formal meetings or coordinatIon with stale or
local agencics 01' a\lthoritie.41j staff and city cOllncil or planning commission pr~selltations ( except
as noted); environmental tests, research andlor reports (EIW or EIS); models and profession,t.I
consult.lOt services. This proposal is based on the City's implementation of the mMtcr plan
including final budget planning, development stl'ategics and organized promotion. Portions of the
master plan. such a~ special fcatures and/or project aspects that require additional design detailing
for purposes of construction and planting can be initiated at a later time~ fees to be negotiated, Any
additional work be):ond the scope of this proposal including extra nleetings, design services,
travel, expenses and pl'eparation time will be charged at my hourly rates, Billing fo!' these
additional scrvices a.c; authotil.cd by the City will appear separately on the monthly statement,
As the City. you will provide an base information. boundary (including rights-of-way and
casements), property ownership, adjacent property uses/ownerships and topographic surveys
"~howing all existing structures (including conditions), site improvements (includmg conditions).
utilities. topography (spot elevations), current aerial photographs, solls, existing(major) trees
(located vertically and horizontally), environmental tests (if required), architectural or engineering
plans and other pertinent data (including. but not limited to: sHe photos, neighborhood studies,
traffic studicf), demographic studies, and other tests, repol'cs or studies of relevant data from the
city. county and state). All data will be highlighted with annotated pOl'tions which the City
-e
e
considcl:-S the criteria and direction for planning and development for the project area. AU
information i~ to be accurate and dluwn to a 1 "=20' and/or 1":;:::50' scale on a reprodudble mylat'
as provided on a certified survey. The City will Pl'ovide stafr planning, enghlcering, marketing and
administrative SUPPOli, as well as a written project direction for development which will outline the
needs. concems and attitudes of the City of StjlJwater relative to this project.
I will work on this project as per your direction a.~ soon as we receive authorization from you to
oogin ow' work and all site documcntationlprogt'am data and information, A detailed schedule will
be developed with the City Plannet~ The master plan is estimated to be substantially complete by
August 15. 1997, I will call you to make a tenu\tivc pl'ojectlmceting schedule.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please return one signed copy as your intent 01'
authorization to proceed.
Thank you for a,llowing me to submit this proposal I am excited and looking fOlward to aM~i.sting
you with the master planning of the Lake McKu~ick At'ea Project of Stinwatel~
A(~CepLCd and Approved by:
"_..~--~-_._----"""'-----~'_I-
Dale:___~
~~......~-......__... .....,..-.--,.-..---.
atUli.'hOlcnts:
location map
fee ~c.hcdule
,
e
T~
..::..--:::.~~: :.~:
I
I
\1
I
e
LAKE MCKUSICK
AREA PROJECT
LOCATION
MAP
NTS
e
e
. .
,,/
,-
FEE SCtlEDULE . 1anuary I, 1996
Landscape Architect, Principal
Landscape Architect, Assistant
Administrative Assistant
Landscape Draftsperson
Secr.etary .
Consultants
Reimbursable Expenses
Retainer Deposit
Project ConstIPlntg Management
Herb Baldwin
Landscape Architect
$ 90,OO/hr
$ 45~75.00/hr
$ 35-45.00Ihr
$ 20-30.00Ihr
$ 15-20.00Ihr
Cost and Management.
Cost
15 - 25% off~
10%
herb baldwin landscape arChiteCt 4196 Wl:st 18Sth street jordan minnesota 55352
612 492-2180
~
e
....
-'.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FR: City Coordinator
RE: Legislative Consultant agreement
DA: November 126, 1996
Discussion:
Attached to this memo is the current agreement between he City of Stillwater and Legislative
Associates, Inc. (Mr. Ed Cain). The agreement expires on December 31, 1996. I assume that the
City would want to consider extending the agreement. If so I would recommend that the Council
direct staff to meet with Mr. Cain to determine the scope of and compensation for the service.
Recommendation:
Council direct staff to meet with Legislative Consultant to develop contract for 1997. Council to
review and consider at meeting of December 17th..
4~
--"--'~~""""'~~"::-.!.:.;;..;.,<,;,,..,,_"~:7--.;'
.
'~,"""'...'
~:;;]'
r'.
\",;",':
"..
CONSULTANT CONTRACT
This contract is made November 1, 1995, between the City of Stillwater, a Home Rule Charter City of
the third class, existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, with offices at 216 North 4th Street,
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082, "City", and Legislative Associates, Inc., 7920 Towerbell Court, Annandale,
Virginia 22003,' "Consultant".
~
RECITALS
The City desires to retain the services of the Consultant to obtain Federal and State support for the repair
of the erosion of the levee wall located in Lowell Park, adjacent to the St. Croix River National Scenic
River Way and related development projects in the City and to secure funding for a new National Guard
Armory.
Consultant agrees to perform these services for the City under the terms and conditions set forth in this
Contract.
In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed between the City and the Consultant
as follows:
SECTION I.
NATURE OF WORK
Consultant will perform the following consulting and advisory services on behalf of the City:
A. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT
1. To seek an amendment of the Federal Water Resources Development Act of 1992, by
making the following changes:
a. To expand the scope of work to include the authorization of the flood control wall
to be constructed approximately 150 feet back of, and parallel with, the existing retaining wall
system;
b.
million;
To increase the Federal share of the project costs from $2.4 million to $4.5
c.
million.
To increase the authorization for the total project costs from $3.2 million to $6
2. To seek an amendment of the Federal Energy and Water Appropriations Act of 1993, by
making the following changes:
a. To increase the Federal share of the Stillwater Levee Project from $2.4 million
to $4.5 million;
b. To increase the non-federal share from $800,000 to $1.5 million;
Page 1
-
~\ . .,,,;,; .
".,
,
.~
(~7
/
I
~
c. To increase the total project approved costs from $3.2 million to $6 million.
-
3. To maintain contacts and keep Minnesota State Legislature Members, staff, and the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) officials informed of changes and progress in levee
funding at the Federal level.
B. GENERAL SERVICES
Services related to meetings and contacts as "point person" representing the City with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, the DNR, and the other agencies and entities associated with the construction of the
levee wall system. The services will also include the monitoring of legislative activity during the State
Legislative Session for bills and hearings that have the potential for impact~g the operation of City
government, and reporting this action to the Council. Other extraordinary work will require prior written
authorization.
C. NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY PROJECT
1. To seek the authorization of the Stillwater Armory Project in the House and Senate
Military Construction bills at a total project cost of $3.612 million; $2.695 million in Federal funds, and
$.917 in State funding.
2. To seek the appropriation of $2.695 million in Federal funds in the House and Senate
Appropriation bills for FY 1996.
3. To work with the Minnesota Department of Military Affairs, the Minnesota National
Guard, the National Guard Bureau of the U .S~ Department of Defense, and other State and Local
organizations.
4. To utilize the offices and capabilities of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation, and to
coordinate their efforts to obtain the needed legislation action.
5. To meet with the Congressional leaders and staff of the eight committees that are
responsible for the legislative action needed to obtain funding for the armory project.
6. To prepare all written materials for the City, the Minnesota Delegation, and others
contributing their support for the project.
7. To elicit additional support from Local and State organizations.
8. To follow the legislative process, attending Congressional hearings, meeting with
Committee Members, and being responsive to questions and inquiries that may arise.
SECTION n.
PLACE OF WORK
It is understood that Consultant services will be rendered largely at the City of Washington, District of
Columbia and at the State Capitol of Minnesota and not in the Office of the City.
Ie
Page 2
--.-------.-.-,--._."-"~.........a.:.._oU\~,,i.l'~,:..:;...;."'.-'....:.." ..:;,;;::;~~.~".
A
~
r
~
,
..
SECTION ID.
TIME DEVOTED TO WORK
e
The City will rely upon the Consultant to put forth such effort as is reasonably necessary to fulfill the
spirit and purpose of the Contract.
SECTION IV.
COMPENSATION
1. The City will pay to the Consultant as follows:
a. A retainer fee in the amount of $500.00 per month beginning January 1, 1996,
through December 31, 1996. This retainer will be compensation for the services described in
Section I, B.
b. For Federal legislative action on Section I., A., services related to the Flood
Control Project during the months from December 1995 through December 31, 1996, at the rate
of $65.00 per hour not to exceed 45 hours per month.
c. For State legislative action on Section 1., A., services related to the Flood Control
Project at the rate of $65.00 per hour not to exceed 30 hours per month beginning December
1995 through April 31, 1996.
d. For Federal and State action"on Section 1., C., services related to the National
Guard Armory Project at the rate of $65..00 per hour not to exceed 18 hours per month from
December 1, 1995, through December 31, 1996. If, however, an Authorization Bill is not
successful, the Consultant must notify the City and this section of the Contract will be reevaluated
and further services on the project possibly eliminated.
e. Ordinary and necessary business expenses incurred by the Consultant and
attributable to the work will be reimbursed in an amount not to exceed $100.00 per month unless
prior written approval is given by the City.
SECTION V.
DURATION
This Contract will be effective from December 1, 1995, through December 31, 1996.
SECTION VI.
STATUS OF CONSULTANT
This Contract calls for the performance of the services of the Consultant as an independent contractor and
the Consultant will not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose.
Page 3
e
---~. --'",,",:"--..~-_.__...~~..-._. ..
~_."' '-~""'."""'~-'-
.~-:-
._---,-<-,."...~..,.,._~_.-,_..., ....
.
" .
.
oJ
'"
.---
( '\
.~
;:-:::...
'..-
SECTION VD.
-
INDEMNIFICATION
Any and all claims that arise or may arise against the Contractor, its agents, servants or employees as
a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the Consultant or its agents, servants or employees
while engaged in the performance of this Contract shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of
the City. Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers and employees
against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims or actions, including attorney's fees,
which the City, its officers or employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be inquired to pay, arising out
of or by reason of any negligence or willful act or omission of the Consultant, its agents, servants or
employees, in the execution, performance or failure to adequately perform Consultant's obligations under
this Contract.
SECTION vm.
AUTHORITY
The City hereby grants to the Consultant all authority reasonably necessary to pursue and achieve the
objectives of this Contract.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this 1st day of November, 1995.
CITY OF STILLWATER
By
By
~A~
Edwin E. Cain, Its President
e
Page 4
~.-::~J_='C::~:"'-,_~':;_~.;~--"'---"'~'"
"fii,.
.~-.
-~-,.,.;';-,-;'.';_":,;:,,'r_":'~
"'~~.-, ..........._......:,,:'""';v..:,;~,....;,._..~~.~..,_..:_
",.:::~~~.,'!"T":,;O".,\l:::",~. J;,-~~t,.~~;-"".
"
'" ',--, , -,"-.: - ."'..,.. ,..'" ,- .
..."";,,:.;._...:.:...:...~~..:a;~'"_.~~_,~.,:.;.~:.;..4::;.:...;..~"'_;..,...w~.,""""...___..,'
._-,' ~. . - -: . ." - ". ~,'''~~~,.,"~.~
"" ~_.v. ~ ~.::. . ~~.,.~~"':...... -""l'" ....,.. '_"'.~"
-~ ------~~--~. '.
:",- ',~_-::
~~~ ----_._._._~._---
_ _H _ .... , ~~ .... '._~~"'.......
- -
, - ,.'.. ,,-'-'-
.t~~;:;;...~-;;;.;,;;~:i.;~:4~
..~_.....-.~""',:".."'!'!
-;,g~..:~;' .---~- '.. >~
d~t:'~'; .,.
F':~'<
','''"', ~:.~:..~_....--:"'"'";.":'~~:;c~~:":-'""'7"..~_~--~"~,..,,~~7""...~__-:_~~.~
'-.~' :-W-7v:":''''''_''' -":""--_':< ""","~"~" ."'._..,
._.__..-~"...,_.~'". ,,-.,...,,--~ ---.....,..- --,-,..--.
'-:'k~""?'
"',Je-
~f-~-.._'.
_._.<....;;~~.
._~~-.
-~~
"
~ ""~.:'":~.~:r~-:_~;:-::--"::....."'_"';:~
-~,- ~--
.._~ .nlL_
::c:.-,._;:'.~t~;i.' ~"'''"-'''7
..;.,....~.<
.. ..-....----'''-~........._~"..~,.......--
-.- . - . .
. - .' -",,', ... '. .
.~-'..............;........~._~_.......-............:.."~.~-...._..:........ ;
,.~'~."""~,..,~-..,,.,.,,,~~- .....;~'~~~.-"..'E.....~. ~
. o. .~"~..~...-,-~. '~'",,'~- .,.... _':':.'" ~~:"::':-_;~~:'~-,';--::~,:.'; --. '_'~"
',; ,C.,;.~,,~~.2~.:.i i,a?'~~_..i::.d;2~_,.~._..~.~., .. ,.~c .i.,. _. ,... ,......
. ----,.~,-,,-~...~~'.'.,..."""'-.--
..._.....,~""""--~-~~~. -<--~-~..~.~--~ &''''!I?'''
. ~..". .' ~
:~ " ,
-. .
.~~~ -,~
--~-,.-.~."""""':~.-9,"-~.~":".,........_-.., ;."...:-:--,~-~.~'=":;....-.,..,~.~~_~..
;'_'~""--O' _ __.~_..._ ~~~~...--...~.,.,""'-~..,.,,_._'-_--.
~,,"-,..\',~ ~""~""""-'- "--'- - .. ...'--..~._.___-'o-_ ~ ". _
,...,-..~_._..'"';,.~.:~~
'.,'.-,-'. .
. -,..;.....,~"'--"',.:.;...,...:-...........n-:.;....."'~_~ . ~;"_., __...4....:__-'--',..'. .<.....~.'..:~. .'.__ ..,
. ...'.-..,....-.- ".
~_. ~~~- ,,---<.. ..;... _...,-, '..-'
,.c.-......,....,,~_._,__:.-'"
.;~~. ....ir~- ~---
.~::.t=.~.;~:.
....----.~,~~~Ti~~-,,:~,:-;~..':::_.......,--......--,~~~",.~..,.:~~...C.-, ';;'-.",.v',-"""'~""';F
~. ~'~~;f=""~,~~~."-,..,,-.....
"~'- -... ~..',-~.-;-:;,...o..;.""... ',,_ . ~'__'''-",''''''~__"''''''~;'"_,,,,'',._
'_~~''''' !.:..L.,.._,_~,~...;.;......_;... ,,_~..~~',..~
'-. --'--~"'~-"""""~'--j"~-'~-""'-"'''"''''''_,:-:''''.''''_'--'-'r~.~
".-~:'
- -.. -'.'-'--'"<::""":~""""~"~':"'"""'--'''':"'-'"':''''-:-~~:::;~-----''''".''~-'-"'':'-----,,---
.'iI:'
. f;_
.'. -- - -'-''''"''~---'''''-'~'''''''-~'''''~-''-''-'-'' .,'.
'.'-~-. .--~...-_.~......,,;..
- ...".-.....!I'...:'-....""......, _~
,_~-~__,~---C-
...
-~.t'
...L.~~: '.._..___
--.- ---..----~~,":'~"'~~~.----------~
----'''','''-r-~-'
. ',.~",.,.~-,-----
.' ~~..:...___~u_,..~. ._.,. .--'-."."'-:...-:"...~':..:.;...L..^"
.. --.-....--.--....,- ..._-~..............---'"'''''''".....-'~ ,...".'._,_...._._-_........'_...-.~-_.-
,-,'::;" {.....~.':.
'..s,_.,.~~Y"...,.".='-':_-~-'-;~.':.-:--.-
~~ ~, .,..-~,.....::~--
~:
~-,
--'~_..---"."'..~'--'..,.~...,..--,..--:-~>--'..~-_._--_._~_......- -~ ---_.__..,~.._,,;-.......-...__.. ..._-~...~~---~--
....J.._... ""."'__h .~, -"_~.-'.........____,__._.
.~~..
. "_.~_,,"';'~"':_i._._ ~ -_.~_....'.,'-'.~.___~"-'_--..L-_'---__._ _
-r.
.;~~.
_i
~~.:-.
.~..
-;;: .-~-
- '........ .
.-~,..
.l -t-
e
Ie
CITY OF STILLWATER
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
DATE: November 26, 1996
SUBJECT: Final Plat Approval for Interlachen Hills Third Addition
DISCUSSION
Attached is a copy of the proposed final plat for Interlachen Hills Third Addition. The developer
wishes to gain fmal plat approval so that a mode~ home can be started. Staffhas reviewed the
fmal plat and has identified a Storm Water and Utility Easement, which needs to be located on
the plat and the need for a Conservancy Easement filed against each lot which borders a wetland.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council pass. a resolution approving the final plat for Interlachen Hills
Third Addition and authorize the Mayor to sign it, subject to receiving a final plat with the above
noted corrections and the park contribution.
e
e
a,
;.
t~
..
.~
.!
-<
2
,..." A'~...
...............-.;.-
1-----,
I
I
I .'>.:tis
I 588011'34"'"
135,57
::c
~
"
"\
~
'..
i-
~
1'\
Bench mark - top nut of hydrant at the .nd ot Bayberry
Av.nuI Court cui-de-soc. ,Itvafion - 876.4'
1
t
~
!i
......... .. ..... ----- ...
-....
............................
.... ... ~ -- --- .---.
... ., t_ _ _ .... ----.
=::.=:-: =--- =
INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
..
I
I
1
----_----1
,.,
,;;
:t
Thl art.ntolion of thl, MorinI .ys"'" I, bond
upon 'h. Walhlnlla" County coordlnat. .ys',,,,,
North ZOf'!I.
No mCtftu""nt symbol Ihown at any Italut. required
locollon Indicat.. 0 ,-ot monurn.nt thot will b, b, '/2
inch by , I Inch Iron pi,. ..t within on, ,.or of the
'Icordln, of thl, ,tot. and marked by R.LS. No. 18213.
--r.-'
" I
___J
-.
l
f
."
/'
,/
(Dlf'Uf,
t ....... y '"
YlC:INllY \lAP
SEC1100I 2'. lWI'. SO. 1IGl:. 20
w,$HtNCtON CCMJNTr. IiIINN[SOt...
_ .. sc.ou
f/1~
[g~
. Denot.. found 1/2- Iron pip. mark.d 1t.L.S. No. 17259
.,
-,
CRAPHIC SCALE
~_~ W
C'!!! - ~---"
Ie:
12
-"
\ J.4.f"I....."
/, At'C. I
/ "- CT. ,/"/"
/ -
r
- -14:
I
~.
3
J' o'l~~'
"
.~;.'!J/'n~w .,
........
1..--
...u..!...
4
,.....
1IIe'lU1D..............
~ . ..-. ... .. ..
......... .,....
III'CIilD ..... w...... -,
........'.. ...
':;t
~ ..~
'"' -c.."'l
a ""<:)
t~""
Q...
I
1
~
~
>c
;;,
'"
"
'"
"
\.
"-
".
:ttli
..u.
a
..."'so,...
~''lI6_
,
,.$~>
#,'/
- --: -;
r
20
_ _ - -:":)012'....
---
l:
l-
~
0:
..
~ii
...
I
,---....I
I
! ~.I
L--;_....IL__...l
10 I
r---, r-L
hi
-I I -,
~J 1....1 IJ \ I
L __.I L__.1 L___~_!.J :-~:...."';';'~-...l
N8901835 H'
989.11
---
23
---
7
....- -
I
~-
1'1' ,~
I NTf"RL.f. CHr.,..
DRIVE
..
..
I..
I. ~
$~
,~~
589'1835 E
33 L. 97 0 Inl.r/.."." Hili. "", Add/lion
,.- _ _ _ _ ~:JZ.. ~ . Me.,und
: ",Z- i 2---7--~
.....
------~~m~---------~r-,-
GLENN REHBEIN COMPANIES
\
~------------------
I ! ' ; , rAl,1"CAP~"''' 7'" - - - - - i
I . . I I I
SHEET
2
OF
2
SHEET:;;
RESOLUTION 96-
APPROVING FINAL PLAT
INTERLACHEN HILLS THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, the proposed final plat request, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is consistent with
the preliminary plat and subdivision plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater,
Minnesota, hereby approves the request for Final Plat for Intedachen Hills Third Addition.
Adopted by Council this 3rd day of December, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
... A..
e
e
'.
.
.
Citizens request to table final approval of the proposed plat
for Interlachen Hills Third Edition until the following issues
are resolved:
1. The final wetland mitigation plan has not been reviewed by the Soil and
Water Conservation District. The SWCD wrote a letter outlining eleven
recommendations to improve the plan. Since then, they have not received
any written comments from the city, even though it is common practice for
them to review the revisions. We request you table final approval until the
SWCD has had the opportunity to review the revised plan.
2. Portions of the grading/drainage/erosion control plan that are in place are
inadequate. The plan, as currently practiced, has already resulted in two
potential violations of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. The plan
must be revised and silt erosion removed or the developer will be issued a
formal wetlands restoration order by the DNA. We request that you table
final approval until an upgraded plan is reviewed by all appropriate
authorities.
3. The usage of the $45,965 park dedication fee is unclear. We request that
you table final approval until you have spelled out in writing that the money
will go specifically for the improvement of Meadowlark Park.
Additional concerns
1. We are curious about the 25 foot buffer ordinance and want to know how that
will impact both the wetland and the size of the front and back yards of lots
on the south end of the wetland. What are the consequences of the newly
proposed conservancy easement?
2. At the last council meeting, Mayor Kimble instructed Mr. Eckles to draft
language to improve the city ordinance governing silt fencing requirements
in and around new developments. We would like a progess report on that
and suggest it requires:
1. A triple ring of silt walls be built around the wetlands.
2. The wall be built into the ground so silt doesn't run under the fence.
3. The walls be staked every 3 feet, rather than the current 8 feet.
4. Hay bales be placed between the walls in vulnerable areas.
....... '
'...
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
'.
1825 Curve Crest Blvd.. Room 101
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 439-6361 Fax: (612) 351-7606
~'~
-'..,." ........\
November 27, 1996
William McCully
Glen Rehbein Companies
8651 Naples Street NE
Blaine, tvlLrmesota 55449
RE: i~}i.c:dlic~1en Hills, 3rd Addition
Dear Mr. McCully:
_This letter is meant to summarize my observations at Interlachen Hills, 3rd Addition, in Stillwater,
Wwashington County. Since the rain storm of November 15, I have received many calls from
neighborhood residents concerning erosion at the development. I relayed the initial report of silt fence
failure to Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer, on 11/18. When I visited the site on 11/20, I did not
. find silt fence down, but instead saw indications of recent repair. However, several observations were'
unexpected.
It was my understanding that a revised wetland replacement plan would be presented for our review
before the wetland filling occurred. This has not been done, although the south side of the wetland has
been filled, and the adjacent wetland replacement area excavated. One of the stormwater ponds near the
wetland has been excavated. The area immediately surrounding the wetland and stormwater pond has
been graded, but not mulched or otherwise stabilized.
It was also my understanding that construction this fall was to be limited to Pineridge Lane, to avoid.
excessive site disturbance through the winter. On my visit on 11/20, Interlachen Drive was extensively
graded with signs of erosion down the slope and off-site to the south.
The silt fence at the wetland filling location appeared to have been recently repaired, with sheets of ice
piled nearby, and a third row of silt fence installed. Due to the ice and 2" snow cover, I could not see
whether a delta of erosion fill was present in the wetland. But after viewing the photos taken by local
residents, I feel that a substantial volume of eroded soil could have entered the wetland. Such fill is a
violation of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and must be removed from the wetland.
.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
-. ,
. . '
It
November 27, 1996
Page 2
· eWhen I visited the site on October 30, I suggested additional silt fence along the DNR Pond extending the
line uphill to the north, to intercept flow down the construction path. This fence has not been extended.
After reviewing the photos of the silt plume within the DNR Pond, I encourage you to increase your
erosion control measures in this area. Erosion fill in this pond would also be a WCA violation.
If you have any questions about these comments, feel free to call me. I have assured the neighbors that I
will continue to watch this site, and also will relay their concerns to Mr. Eckles.
Sincerely,
'?v~~
utneen Thatcher
W etlanc1 Technician
cc: Kbvton Eeldes, City of Stillwater
. ~o\-~',
-(Y\ 'S. -\',,-0\ ~e-..r- "'~€-~ e", 10"'-" LO\)e.J' ?G\.~ ~
-\' ~ 4; \N ~ \ e.-\\- -€,.,I" \ ~ '" cr\ '" ~ <:> {' "'^ c... \
"-eh~O""'~ '0 --"'" 0..... ~'<L""') 'b "'-~ "" ~ ~ '\ \ 'M '; 'N:J.- ~ 'I
~'L-e.-~ "" ~0~6\'o\~v'~\c-M.~~ ~\\\)
~O" \ ~ ' '\ ~
w'v-,,,\ <--\r.., ~"^'€...- ~~.....'O'^ ~ \~ 6""6~.s \ S \ "'- ~
\)"'; 0 '\ ~ .... 0 YOv':;, <0 c;;;. -\ "^~ v0 LA ,
.
~
11-27-19964:37PM
FROM
P.2
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
October 8, 1996
WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
.-
1825 ell"'. C,...llvd.. __ I\)I
Still_f... MH S5Oe2
('12) q9.6:l61
Klayton Eckles
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
(C ;::::::--" ......;.::::::"-S\ .,f"":1
I \ 1 .' j I ,."
C'i .:'j.'::::::.' .!
\\ ;... r U
../') ,-:_::.. J L; .
fFllIL~ @@W>W
RE: Wetland Replacement Plan - Review Comments - Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition
Dear Mr. Eckles:
The Washington Soil and Water Conservation District has reviewed the Wetland Replacement Plan submitted by Glen
Rehbein Companies for lnterlachen Hills 3rd Addition, Stillwater, Browns Creek Watershed. The wetland replacement
plan was reviewed for conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Stillwater is the Local Government
. for the WCA and may incofPorate our agency's comments into the city's review process. Based upon the plans
witted on September 10. 1996, I would offer the following comments: .
Note: Specific recommendations have been underlined.
1. Activities in wetlands are regulated by the US Anny Corps of Engineers, therefore a permit from that a~en~ is ~lso
required [plan item Impact (12)].
2. The wetland delineation report does not include data. sheets for the wetland fringe on the DNR pond 306w. ~
bound~of this wetland must be delineated. before plans for the en~ di:;sipation pond are ~prp..ved. This
strUcture must not encroach upon the wetland edge. which often is at a higher elevation than the ordinary high water
level or pond surface elevation. We recommend th~ tbe :iY~Ia.nd houndat)' ~ ~~~'" P}1rini constmctiou to
rninimi~e tbe chance of inadvertent fillin~ Of' encT'O~ent.
3. The proposed filling of the southernmost portion of the wetland appears to be fOf the conStrUction of a single-family
dwelling. Altern~i~~ shopJd be considered tha.t avoid or lessen this tillina- A Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP)
which met on October 7. 1996, felt that the overall project adequately addressed sequencing when considering the
site constraints. The TEP does sUiiest that the ilPplicant further document the decisions made to cQUlply with the
Ci~'o:: r~quin::meot~ in addressin~ zonin~ or environmental impacts.
4. The replacement ratios submitted as part of the replacement plan do not follow those required under the WCA.
However. the areas drawn on the consnuction plans appear to meet the minimwn requirements. The plan narr~ti'Ve
$bQl.\ld be revised to reflect the correct ~plac~ent values for water quality ponds (not to exceed 75% of treatment
pond area) and public value differences between wetland Types 1 and 3. A copy of the pertinent sections of the
WCA is enclosed with this letter.
5. A r.eveietation plan must be provided for the ~placement Type 1 wetland and any uptiV19 bqffer tones. The
submitted plan relies on spreading. the excavated material as the seed source for veietation in the replacement
. wetlands. This might be adequate for the mitisation area adjacent to tbe Type 3 wetland. although adive
l:'evegetatioD is preferred. However, the site conditions at the Type 1 wetland are significantly different, and need a
specialized planting plan. There is less water available at the Type 1 site and the tree canopy surrounding this basin
AN EQUAL OPPOttTUNalY &MP1..0YU
P.3
. 1.1-~7-1996 J.: 37PM
FROM
'_.,996
willlirnit t~e available s;JnHgh.t, making conditicns unsuitable for the s?e~ies found in ~he Type 3 wetland. I suggest
that this area ce pbmned as .':, Type 7 we:iand (wovded swamp), which would also increas~ the public value credits
referred to above, in Nct~ 14. There are several ma.ure willows along th~ north edge ofthe we::1and, which could be
affected by the construccicn o~ the replacement wetland. We e:'lconraie preserviC2 an willows wiJb rtiaUl~ters of
m'pre th~J.dbh), If the saddle betw~en the Type 3 ~d Type 1 wetlands is i:lclnded in the conserVation easement,
I would s~ase't Ievegetating with woody pla:)t materials to establish a connection between the wetlands a.T1d
discourage infringement upon the ~asement. The upland buffer around the wetlands should be planted to native
species,
6. The applicant is responsible for e:nsuring t.~e replacelYler.t w~tland b~cotrles "wet". The soil report for the Type 3
wetland inl'iicates the presence of a deep loa.m horizon under the upland soils, although the location of the sample is
not identified and cannot be correlated with the r~placement site.. Borines :3bol1h.i be takeu within the areas proposed
for replacement wetlands to veriftj that the soil will <;upport a wetllmd. Alternatively, a pro'iision could be included
explaining the actions to be taken if the existing soils are unl!kely to support a wetland.
7. Design guidelines for replacement wetlands require sides lopes to be less steep than 5: 1, with 10: 1 being preferred.
The sideslopes portrayed on the preliminary grading plan show slopes at 5: 1 :t and fairly consistentarou.."ld all
wetlands. We enconrag.e tbe ins:lJ.l~j9n of ~me are~ pf shallower slope. for a more natural appearance and habitat
mnction.
8. Replacement site #3 (Type 1 wetland) is very close to the property line. The conmuction of thjs a.placement
wetland mll~ not encroa~b Qpon the nei~borini prop~. The sideslopes shown on the preliminary grading plan in
this area exceed the WCA guidelines for steepness, and should be modified. .
9. W:4ter control ~tnld:ures must be built ip accordance with the !;pecifications of the Minnesota Wetland 'Restorllti9n
~u::r:.~~'\l~ .hg)Ild ~ ,hown nnlhe plans. While silt fence ~ shown o.n the preliminary ~iog plan.
we suggest that all addItIonal measures that are planned (such as catch basm protectIon, temporary sedunent ponds,
and stabilization of stockpiles and excess fill) also be shown. AJty additional measures planned for protection and
stabilization of the critical slope on the east side of the site (overlooking the DNR pond) should also be described;
especially pertaining to the installation of the stonn sewer pipe. .
11. A maintenance pl~n for an crtormwat~\ treatment p~mds !;hould be pnwided. including the energy-dissipation pond
adjacent to the DNR pond. Furthermore, access easements must be designated to accommodate such maintenance.
Overall. I feel this plan could be approved with conditions consistent with the comments noted above. Because of the
severe topography on this site, as well as the sensitivity of the DNR wetland downhill,. we suggest that the project be
pbased to provide the areatest initial prot~ction to the wetlands during CODstruCtiO~ perhaps by creating the stortnwater
ponds flISt. This site, as in-fill development, bas more intrinsic constraints than are typically found on new development
sites. The developer appears to have tried to miniJnize impacts to the wetlands and create a desirable repla.cement for the
impacted wetland. Therefore a greater fle.ibility on sequencing has been allowed:han would b. granted on more typical
new residential developments.
1 hope this letter assists Stillwater in the review process for the lnterlachen Hills 3rd Addition project. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call me at 4:39-6361.
Sincerely,
~
V\"
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS · HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH · STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
612-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612-430-4350
Donald C. Wisniewski, P.E.
Director Public Works/County Engineer
John P. Perkovich, Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J. Theisen, P.E., Deputy Director
Technical & Administrative Division
Sandra K. Cullen, P.E.
TrafficfTransportation Engineer
Edward Kapler,
Facilities Operations Manager
Nov. 18, 1996
The Honorable Jay Kimble
Mayor of Stillwater
216 N. 4th St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
MANNING AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY
Dear Mayor Kimble:
Earlier this year, Washington County completed an update of the County Comprehensive Plan, including a 2015
Transportation Plan. This document provides guidance as we respond to transportation issues in the future.
Our 2015 Transportation Plan identified corridors that may require study for possible additional roadway improvements.
One corridor is the area between the intersections of Trunk Highway 5/Manning Avenue and Trunk Highway 36/Manning
Avenue. A better connection between T.H. 5 and T.H. 36 has been discussed for many years but never formally
studied.
Washington County is beginning the Manning Avenue corridor study. The purpose of this study will be to review
alternatives for providing a Manning Avenue direct connection and to complete an environmental assessment of these
alternatives. We will also evaluate a "do nothing" alternative. The final product of this study would be a
recommendation for inclusion in County and local plans.
We need your help in this endeavor. We will be conducting public meetings throughout the study process. We are
establishing a project management team to help guide us and prepare us for these public meetings. This team will be
made up of our Public Works staff, staff from our project consultant Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch (SRF), Mn/DOT staff, and a
representative from each community along the corridor. We are asking that you select a person to represent your City
on the team.
We expect that the team will be meeting on a monthly basis from January to July, 1997. Meetings will be held at our
office and last no longer than 2 hours. Once we have a team roster we will select a time that is convenient.
Please feel free to contact Don Theisen (430-4304) or myself (430-4370) with the name of your representative. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact either of us.
We look forward to working with you on this study.
Si~rely,
~\V~
Donald C. Wisniewski
Director of Public Works/County Engineer
cc: Charleen Zimmer, SRF
...\djtlmanning.ltr
--
Printed on Recycled Paper
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION V ACA TING AN UTILITY EASEMENT
WHEREAS, a Petition was presented praying for vacation of a part of an utility easement in the
City of Stillwater; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did determine that the Petition was sufficient; and that the City is
a Home Rule Charter City of the Third Class and that it was proper to proceed with the vacation pursuant
to Minn. Stat. 440.135; and
WHEREAS, at a meeting duly called for that purpose, the City Council did on the 3rd of
December, 1996, determine that the proposed vacation would not interfere or defeat the public interest
or adversely affect the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Petition be and the same is hereby granted
and that the following utility easement, be and the same is hereby vacated:
An easement for utility purposes over the West 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 4, Fairmeadows No.3
according to the plat thereof and as described in Document No. 31095 on file and of record with
the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution duly certified by the City Clerk
shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Washington County, Minnesota.
Adopted by affirmative vote of all members of the City Council this 3rd day of December, 1996.
By Jay L. Kimble, Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Modi Weldon, Its Clerk
e
M^Sf:..
~~STA
AMA TEUFl
SPORTS
COMMISSION
NEWS RELEASE
FYI
For immediate release: November 25. 1996
6 page release
Contact: Paul Erickson. Executive Director
Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission
(612) 785-5630
fax: (612) 785.5699
1700 l05th Ave N.E.
Blaine~ MN 55449
MASC Awards 22 Grants in Round Three of "Mighty Ducks"
Ice Arena Construction Grants
Blaint:. Minn .. At its November 25 meeting, rhe Minnesora Amateur Sport<; Commission (MASC)
awarded 21 granrs, wealling $2.45 million, to build new ice arenas or to renovate existing ice facili-
des around rhe state. The grants. which all require a match of local priV'.1re or public funding. wel'e
awarded via rhe "Mighty Ducks" granting program of the Srate Capital Bonding Fund.
The grants awarded Monday an: for projects wirh 1997 consmlction stares. In April of rhis yc:ar. rhe
MASC awarded 32 grants for projects wirh a ) 996 construction srart.
The 12 c::ommunieics receiving granrs to build new arenas are Anoka County, Blaine, Brooklyn Park.
Eagan, Hastings, Inrernarional Falls. Mahromedi, Mankaro, New Brighton, Ramsey Count)',
Roseau, St. Michad/Alberrvillc. and Stillwater.
A toral of $2,05 million will be awarded roward the construction of neW ice arenas, which will level'-
age m: least an additional $26 million in local privaee and public construction spending.
The 9 c.ommunides rccc:iving grants to renovate existing arenas arc Apple: Valley, Brainerd. Eden
Prairie. Mapleron. Minneapolis Public Schools, Minnetonb, Mound, Proc::tor, and Ramsc:y County.
The $400,000 co he granrcd to communities renovating their c:xisdng ice facilities willlcver~ge an
additional $5 million in 10ct'll spending.
The grants will assise in [he construction of 14 new sheets of ice and help fund Lhe renovation of a
roral of 10 sheets of ice.
The 1996 Legislature awardc:d n rotal of$8 million f01' ice f."Icilities. Ar its meeting this pasr April.
the: MASC awarded grams ror~lIil1g $4.286 million. With Monday's gl'MH awards, $1.264 million
remain in (he Mighry Ducks ice ;lrena grant fund, $1 million of rh~1L babnce has b,,:n alloctlccd (0
the conm'uc(ion of a n:ltioll:\l curling center to be built by the cirit:s of Virginia, Mounrain 11'On,
e Gilbert. nnd Eveleth,
n i\10RE ~~
These gr;\Ius, cUlnbincd with the April awards, accomplished a MASC gnal to grant ~ cotal of $750,000 pel'
Congressional District for new arenas.
The grants continue the effortS. dating back over twO Yt'iHS. hy rhe Millncsora Lcgi~latUl'c :lnd rhe Minnesota
Amateur Sports Commission to addrclis the crisis ice shorr:1ge in tht: Statc. This is the second phase of "MiglllY
Ducks" grants. The MASC ilwarded $2.9 million, in 23 grants. in D<::cel'nbcr of 199'). Thur invcstl1icll( i\ssisted in -
the construedol1 of 13 new sheets of ice. .,
Tht legislature identified the following objectives for the Mighty Ducks icCJarc:na grant program, which the MASC
sought to meet in the aW~\l'ding of its grants:
. Provide increased opportunities for female ice sport participation;
. Increase icc.time access for sports orner than hockey;
. Generate: increased net economic activity for the stattj
. Encourage partnerships among public. and private organizations.
###
ei
COMPLETE TEXT OF MIGHTY DUCKS ICE ARENA GRANT RESOLUTION
November 25, 1996
WHEREAS, laws of Minnesota 1996 240 A .09 authorize the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission to award
8 million dollars for new ice arena grants and renovation grants and,
AtHEREAS, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission has published a Request for Proposals in the March
~, 1996 State Registrar and,
WHEREAS, 46 Minnesota cities have made application and,
WHEREAS. the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission recommends the following cities receive ice arena
grants,
NEW ARENA GRANTS
AENOVATION GRANTS
1st congressional District
City of Mapleton
$30,000
2nd Congressional District
Cities of St. Michael & Albertville
City of Mankato
$200,000
$250,000
3rd Congressional District City of Eden Prairie
City of Brooklyn Park $150,000 $25,000
City of Minnetonka $25,000
City of Mound $25,000
~, ~
4th Congressional District
Ramsey County (Highland Arena) $250,000 '..___. __" Ramsey County $100,000
City of New Brighton $250,000
5th Congressional District
Minneapolis Public Schools $50,000
, ..----.... ..
6th Congressional District
City of Blaine' $125,000 City of Apple Valley $50,000
Anoka County $125,000
City of Hastings $125,000
City of Eagan $125,000
City of Mahtomedi $125,000
City of Stillwater $125,000 I
7th Congressional District
City of Roseau $100,000
--'
8th Congressional District
City of International Falls $100,000 City of Brainerd $45,000 I
City o!. Proctor _~50,OOO
.,--'
District 1
La Crescent
Rochester/Olmsted County
Dodge County
Total granted: $750 K
District 2
New Prague
Sleepy Eye
St. Michael/AlbertVille
Mankato
Total granted: $750 K
Dlstric13
Maple Grove
Edina
Orono Hockey & ISO #278
Brooklyn Park
Total granted: $750 K
District 4
Inver Grove Heights
Ramsey County (Highland Arena)
New Brighton
Total granted: $650 K
District 5
51. Louis Park
New Hope/ISO #281
To be determined
Total to be granted: $750 K
- . -oistri ct 6
Blaine
Anoka County
Hastings
Eagan
Mahtomedi
Stillwater
Total granted: $750 K
District 7
Alexandria
Detroit Lakes
Moorhead
Roseau
Total granted: $750 K
District 8
Elk River
Duluth
Moose Lake
International Falls
Total granted: $750 K
NEW ARENA GRANTS
By COngreSSional Dislrict
April and November 1996 granling rounds
$250 K April 1996 e
$250 K April 1996
$250 K April 1996
$250 K April 1996
$50K April 1996 ".,''' . .
$200 K November 1996
$250 K November 1996
$250 K
$250 K
$100 K
$150 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
$150 K
$250 K
$250 K
April 1996
November 1996
November 1996
$250 K
$250 K
$250 K
April 1996 ::
April 1996
$125 K
$125 K
$125 K
$125 K
$125 K
$125 K
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996
$150 K
$250 K
$250 K
$100 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
$250 K
$250 K
$150 K
$100 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
e
Renovation Grants: By Congressional District. April and November 1996 granting rounds
.
District 1
Rochester
Kasson/Mantorville/Dodge Center
e Dodge County
Waseca
Mapleton
Total granted: $230 K
District 2
Worthington
Marshall
Sleepy Eye
Windom
Hutchinson
Luverne
Total granted: $300 K
District 3
Brooklyn Park
Osseo/ISO #279
Eden Prairie
Minnetonl<a
Mound
Total granted: $150 K
District 4
Ramsey County
West $t. Paul
Ramsey County
Ramsey County
Total granted: $250 K
District 5
Richfield
Minneapolis Public Schools
Total granted: $100 K
DIstrict 6
Cottage Grove
Inver Grove Heights
White Bear Lake
Farmington
Apple Valley
Total granted: $179 K
District 7
East Grand Forks
Total granted: $45 K
District 8
Lindstrom
Duluth
Silver Bay
Mora
Carlton
e Coleraine
Brainerd
Proctor
T('\t~1 f1r:mt.:>ri' $395 K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$30 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
$50 K
$50 K
$50K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
$25 K
$50 K
$25 K
$25 K
$25 K
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996
$50K
$50 K
$50K
$100 K
April 1996
April 1996::
April 1996'
November 1996
'.i,;,,~
$50 K
$50 K
Apri11996
November 1996
$40K
$23 K
$16 K
$50K
$50K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
$45 K
April 1996
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$50 K
$45 K
$50 K
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
April 1996
November 1996
November 1996
November 1996 Mighty Duck Grant Awards
.\i
\.
Distribution
. Ro~c;lu
M^St.
~ .,. ...",
.-
~......~
~"INNESCJTA
~ AMATlillR
SI'ORTS
COlfAflSSION
e
. Brtlinlll'd
. New An:llll Omnl
. Renovntion Gmlll
_.-
\
\
\
\
\.
SI. Mi.:h:~1 . An~kil County
Albl.:nvillc . Bl:ull.~
Bnmklvll . Nt!w Bt'ighe<,n "
p",~ 1'---:-; Muhlol11~di. ..~ilIwlllcr
I M[1lf:-1-.. . R:ll1t~~,f:I'UI1I~'
Mound . PuliiH; ! " "1:;:
M..' IS':h.oO!~ '1 .. R:!nt;;",,"CoulIl~"(IIil!hl.\Ild)
mnclun..:l .. . i'- , J'
1.-..:...:....-\...> ',.J :;:
. . HMlinl!~
F.dell L!.u"m\ . -
Pnliric ~.
,WPh: Vall.:)'
. Mal'll!lUl1
. MunkillO
\
.'.
:.)
~;;
i~
.J:l:::;:<;~::'il~~::~~~.!:~::*~::-.;;:,:::~'::~:::~::;;;:.:::':..:J.:::;~::,::i :;: ~:;:;-:::~:>'::::~:'''#c:..;:~.c:::::;:;;~:.~;;~~~''':",:::~>,:,;:~,::..::;;e:~:~~::;i:;;;:~;::;:~:~:~:.:;:o;.~::::.~::':'~~:~~::~::'::~:i::i::~'::l':;::.:::):.x::.::::;:!~i::::~ ;:~i:":":::;'~::'~:::~:::~'~;;~~;~~:~:::~:y.(:~~ ::~;;;;.~t';:;
e
LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC.
e
Washington Office:
1l013Oth Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
(202) 625-4356
Fax (202) 625-4363
Minnesota Office:
P.O. Box 2131
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 439-7681
Fax (612) 439-7319
November 24, 1996
To: Mayor and Council Me
City of Stillwat
From: Ed Cain, LAI
Subject: Stillwater Bri ge and other issues
Attached is a copy of Secretary Babbitt's response to the joint letter by Governors
Carlson and Thompson. You will note that the decision has been delayed again. Now
the Director of the National Park Service, Roger Kennedy, will be meeting with the NPS
Field Director on December 4, 1996. After their meeting, the final report will be sent to
the Department of Justice for their review. If this schedule is followed, we could expect
to get a decision about mid-December.
Our meeting with the Park Service did accomplish one thing. The Washington
officials now know that this is an important issue to the States of Minnesota and
Wisconsin, and that it is a sensitive political issue. Without the involvement of the
Governor's offices and the Congressional Members represented in the meeting with the
NPS and Justice, I feel certain a negative decision would have been made last week.
Since the last Council meeting, I have met with the MNDOT staff to coordinate
our efforts with the work they are doing. I have done follow up phone calls with the
Minnesota and Wisconsin Congressional Delegations, and prepared delegation letters
for both States.
e
I have updated the Governor's office and the Lt. Governor on our meeting in
Washington and the follow up work we are doing. Sherry Enzler, of the AG's Office and
I have met and talked again about the Washington meeting, and the status of the legal
work being conducted by the Attorney General. Sherry provided me with a number of
strong talking points as to why the Stillwater Bridge should not be considered a 'water
resources project." She is very optimistic about our position should it go to court.
We still need a strong letter from Bill Luther, Rod Grams, and Paul Wellstone. I
will d.raft letters for them this week, and continue to put pressure on them to get them up
to Babbitt and the Park Service. Also, I will prepare letters for the Mayor's signature as
follow up to those we met with in Washington.
I also have meetings this week with the Corps of Engineers regarding additional
FY 1997 funding for the levee project, the DNR Water Division regarding funding in the
1997 Legislative Session and the Governor's Budget, General Gary LeBlanc re progress
on the plans and specs for the Armory, and calls and materials to DaD about our
progress. Give me a call if you have questions or would like additional information.
I J..,_
....'-il-. ..'.... I" .:'. -,' '.....~_.,
I_.~> ,.,;'~~"- 7~.. :....'.. .~'_
.. ,., ..r, . I
, ';:'" - ' " .' ~: ,.. .... '. j~ .:'~' ,,'.: '.
" .' : .~. .'. . ,:':' .:"~ "-.
. ". .,'
!:
. , l: !.. '
I, ':. .
j ~ i:.> r ~':,"<." -'.
. ~ l' . "
,. .
," "
..',... \I J..~ ;;',.} ~~.J. i. WI ,~ . ..)Ll ....'L
fY1v~1 t)
.'. . f.1IV IIJT-\ 1~4 .
(o~ I ~.;-
. Sf .'~h'" .6h'~f-A~
al\.e! w~ I~~ e
~ f tU- ct.'-m..o,.....J ... ~ L{ /
@ ~ 10 ~. lkr'-l'-
- pI ~ o...J..uf51!J . ,
'.' V_ 'W~~ &.J.k;t'1-S
"7\ e.h.O-.n.t.Ch-;1.Pf..t'l'l eO'
p(1W tuYYel:Jf~~
tA a. LL U ."'C...:b: .
I:' <
, . ~"
G0 - d "1t:I.v:r.L .
~. f..
.. ;'. ;': '. "
."",
".,' ': ,.:....:, ~. .' . " ,: , ,,:'.: , '. " '. i . . . .. : ..' "t
THI, s.tO,RErARY,:()FTHt JH"~Rio~
. . .:: : :';_. . , : '. ."-: :',.~' I {. ",: I.. :':I.<~;, ';' . ~", '::',
. .' . ..WA:5Ji iN'GTON
. . ~. r '. ; .. :. ';. .
, '""""'"
, .' ":,
,,: ,'~ ; .'
, " .
. ,,1 .
..'
..: ~.:.' I""
. " .:':j".:,;,.., ": ;," ...... '..
. .' NqVCmbeI ,20. 1996
;.....1.
HanoI2ble.~ H~ ,~'
GOvernor. . L:,
130 State capitol '. ,),>. t
51. Paul, :M.ii1neSota5S1S~.
~-
I~~
'k-D-L' l..~
@~- ~ ~
}\.,lc CLuff - D.( .
~\ .
:~'i' I,:
, ,.',.
. '-:,.;,'.; :'j'. ..;' .'
Honorable. TomruyG..: tbdntp$Ob
Governor".' ., ". ,.>,
.,.. I
Sr:u.e Capitol.,. . ... I: :-", i '...
Madison) wiSConsm '~';J'J07.' . I
'.' '.. '.: .
. . I~' : ..' ;: .
Dear Governors Car~()n:'ana.~~; 1 .
'. , .' ;: .' '.', :,:::.,.:';. '.' .....1... .... .; .' ': ',' .
1ba.nk youforyourletfet.of October'29:iegarding the National Park Service's Section 7
. review of t1ieP~'.new,.St.CrdixJ.UverBrldge'. whi9hw(luld cross through a portion of
the St. Crob..Natforial,'scemcRlverway.: ....; '. '. . .. ...... .'
'.' .' ..., '.: ...., i .' {...... .... '. . .', ..' 'i
. .' : ,:.:,.' ..' ,;:" ..; !
We beIieYeyour~tiye$tatc's rc!cOrdsc#tthepropOsed bridge should coutain letters from
the National Park SerYice w'19S7, 1990 and 1994 expressing the agency's eoncertl$ about
ale project's PO~'eft'e~aJ:lCt'the'~ f'orreVk"" pufsUant to Section 70f the National
Wild &. Scenic'RiveiilAct:.Por that reason, 1 do not believe it is accurate to ch.a.racterize the
Service's aaioilSas "l~St.iWDute.r':' . '. . .
'.. '.' ....;.:....; .
. !': :'. ~ , '. . ~.. ;. . , .' . . ..
This Section 7 re~eWiScUrremty. inproeess. :neNPS, Field 'Director began bis final
review of the 40ewnent CD NoveJDPeflZiancl a: meeting. is 'planned here in WashingtOll with
the NPS DiieCtOr on.~'W ..'" . .' . .. .....,. .
, ~ . . ." .. . : , ' I'.. '. .
Upon C01llI'I~on of tl:i~:~~.YOUsl10uld bt aWare~{the document willlik.ely
undergofurthe~revieW;bothhereand at: the;JUstlce'Dep~etlt due to the pendtncy of
litigation Qver ~ pio~:f)~dg~iwQJvtn8 t1le' Section 7 ..~eterminacion.
Y,: I ,,') . " . ',': .".., .
We will be happy (0 keez.,YouiWOxmed (J1~PrOgIess in this matter.
:;'lee.
(kJ'1J.J-I~
~
~
~t.....u
Wrrrlo-..
~. ;...,
" · . Sincerely.
*
e
(;/(;
a~'lid
. I ..
!,Be0~Bel'i~ la'o I
~ON~3no~ SH~ ~o a~IddO'WO~~ ~~.~t
!:l6-\~-nQN
e
LO"'ml'ELL IN"N"
Mary Palmer SimoD, Arthur and Maureen Palmer. Innkeepen
102 North Seoood Street, Stillwater MN "082-5099
WNW. com. Jowellinn.com
Stillwater City Council
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater MN 55082
November 26th 1996
Is the Stillwater City Council considering imposing a lodging tax on customers of local lodging estab-
lishments? Until recently, neither council nor staffhas made me aware of any renewed efforts to do so.
If this rumor is true, the Palmer fiunilyand employees of the Lowell Inn expect the council to be conser-
vative and cautious and, at minimum. undertake a comprehensive tax and financial study before drawing
any conclusions about the feasibility of any additional taxation. A delineation of risks and the identifi-
cation of potential negative consequences requires a professional. financial analysis such as that recently
provided the council by the Springstead report covering the proposed sports center.
The "economy" segment of the Stillwater lodging market has good reason to believe that an establish-
ment-specific, lodging tax, dedicated to tourism promotion, would benefit their business. This because
additional lodging generated by the proposed new marketing efforts would necessarily be required to
stay on the S. W. edge of the city on hwy 36. The. economy aspects of motel lodging, as well as their
ability to handle large groups, excludes all other lodging properties from benefiting from such business.
Furthennore, any narrow-based, selective tax on our sensitive and short-seasoned, "luxury", market
segment, threatens to drive customers to economy lodging at the expense of those serving that portion of
the lodging market patronizing a broad range of downtown, retail merchants. None ofus are getting
"rich" doing what we do to contribute to the local economy. The addition of high -ticket visitors to the
city's commercial, retail activity are a direct result of the efforts ofB&Bs, Lumber Baron's and Lowell
Inn. Nevertheless, ecooomic survival in our highly-seasonal, significantly competitive market subseg-
ment, though a top priority, is a difficult hurdle for each of us who serve the so-called, "luxury" market.
The Palmer fiunilyand employees of the Lowell Inn have not yet found a sound basis for supporting
those who propose the imposition of a lodging tax for the City of Stillwater. No indication has been
given to anyone, at any time, that support from the Lowell Inn could, or would, be forthcoming.
Moreover, it is highly presumptuous for the city to believe they can create any organization capable of
investing our hard-eamed, advertising dollars more efficiently, wisely and ecooomically than ourselves.
The state statutes permitting local governments to impose the most selective, unfair and discriminatory
tax yet devised. This tax is a classic example of 'laxation without representation." If it were tea you
were trying to tax, rather than our precious customers-I would 'lhrow it all overboard!"
Since 1970, the Lowell Inn has averaged nearly $100,000 annually to promote our business and the City
of Stillwater. We have done so in spite of the fact that a major portion of our business is energized by
'~ork-of-mouth" advertising. We are not looking for any ''pay-back''.. .just merely to be left alone to
continue to do what we know works. Our ads and promotion have been designed to promote and ac-
commodate the "destination" aspects of our market subsegm.ent. At the same time we are promoting
regionally the concept of "historic" Stillwater. The Lowell Inn has been doing these things long before
those who support inequitable taxation arrived in Stillwater. It would be an understatement to say that,
"in respect to the image of the City of Stillwater, the Lowell has paid, and continues to pay, its dues."
Ie
On the other hand, you might find the Palmer fiunily, Lowell Inn employees and other businesses very
supportive of a nominal, ~o/o, city-wide, sales tax whose funds are, (i) exclusively dedicated to support
the financing and maintenance of a public, capital asset such as the proposed new, sports facility, and
(ii) subject to specific "sunset" provisions terminating the tax when the bonds are retired.
This approach would not jeopardize our 70 Lowell Inn jobs wbich aN increasingly depfIldent upon
lodgina nMIlues which... tied to a danprous, repidly increuiDg ownupply oftransieat rooms. From
the pea.,ww of our marbt _ anaoins business problems, we ask the council to be carefid that it
"do DO wrong" and Ds& put our near-milliao dollar, aonual payroll . risk for questicmble results from a
1bird d1amber. The council may Ippreciate the analysis below deIaibina the type, quantity and identity
oftbe todP8 ~ of Stillwater', hospitality market. 'Ibougb not idaifiecl as ~ all the prop-
erties can be easily catesoriIlId as beios ill either the &&eccmomy" or "luxury" market subsegma,
& Demand __
._~.r~,;~"':. : """",~~,,,:,~,::':;:'~':';.;~:;'i':.,~:.,./.~..:::-1;,.;.:;;;~~
....
~~
->
..>.....
.....
....
.,.: ..~....,.;..~
'ii
..~
~
..~
...
.l
''''
~
..x
:~
......-.......~:.:.. .!....,~...,....... .... ::"':;.' y ~-::'~
'ii
<,-
.
.;
.~
'"
.,.
~
.~
,.,
~
..
...
'lJ
~
.~
'.
...
~
~
...
~
-;
M~'.H~'",~ 'Y':~.'~-~~"i':" ~... ~~~~
52 5' ~i
>>. Sf ~
~
t'U 1,.
lM-
N......... .
t.owcU "-
...... o.m.
1WwaI...,.......
II' -1M
T............ B. B
21
21
21
21
-:.... II. P.........
... 6".w.c.
.......w.rt
~ ......,.....
........ ..
NM'" ftelIt6
I.-~"
..... ..
....,~_aecI
a......
o.au.lAIp'" ...
.......... .
5
.
4
I
If
.......... ... .......
10
N. .
:~ .
I..,
121
II.I~
21
.. ...... ........"! ;.
4
S
.
5
5
..
I
...
21
21
21
21
21
4
J
I
,
S
~
t
...
60
A
4
S
.
S
~
..
2
..
~
"
a
111
10
a
u,
21
42
..
s
.
S
J
..
I
.
a
II'
UI
..'"
III _ 2JS
..." ..... 11.1"
~A....
21
42
1
a
..
s
.
s
s
,
.
t
..,
213
JU~
IUIIK
"
.-
J
.
,
s
,
)
..
2
"
co
,5.1"
e
21
42
)
131
."
.
5
I
,
,
J
3
.
I
~
.~
..-
'1~
r
.~~
~
0Iwi0us, is the fact thIt Iodsina establidutllllllU 818 relatively Iarp in number .d np__ . .i2able
number oftupayers with COIIUDClI1 intereIta _ depeDdImcies. NCJt obvious, is tho fact that the Lowell
Ian is the Iarpst employer ofbotb fidI.. and part-time Stillwater ~.. of lilY lodging or food
..w:e establ~. On the other hand, it is JeIdiIy appanIlt that the rapid, compouad increue in the
available 10dPta units is pUUiaa economic preuure 011 both segments ofStilJwater's ~8 marbt.
cc: Dick Olsen
'~-'~~iIt<-- ,~;--..,:;;..~...:3';."",;'''':'''';;;.fJJ:.'.;.ii:f,''''',:'~'''''':~;''''_''!;';;''''f-
~~
Y;',.7p"""",-,".:, -
e
fY~
David C. Anastasi *
Robert M. Gleason
14524 61st Street Court N.
Stillwater. MN 55082
Fax 612-430-8430
Phone 612-439-2951
'V
e
ANASTASI & GLEASON
A Professional Association
* Also admitted in Wisconsin
November 19, 1996
city of stillwater
city Hall
ATTN: steve Russell
216 North Fourth
stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Russell;
As you know, one of our firm clients is a local bank, and we are
involved with the financing on numerous new construction projects
in stillwater.
Most recently, we were asked to put together the financing
documentation for two new construction projects in short order and
had to obtain the standard flood plain and zoning information from
you office the day before the closing. You responded within hours.
I want to take this opportunity to personally thank you for your
prompt, courteous service and let you know that it is greatly
appreciated.
DCA: j r
e
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
", ....._". "''''~'''''''''''':'-:.::'',''..'''''':'';,...,.".."...".,'!t'. T. .....;._{..~,_'" .. ,_' ":'-'
\-' /
('-\ ~)JJ
ECFC
Early Childhood Family Center
-
o ..
e
, I
~
November 18, 1996
George Ness
Stillwater Fire Department
212 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Ness,
Thank you so much for your donation to our 1996 Parent Night Out & Silent Auction.
Our special event was a fabulous success because of the generosity of the Stillwater Fire
Department and over one hundred other individuals and businesses in the greater Twin
Cities area! Your fire truck ride was once again a.big hit!
Thanks to the dedication of your business and our many volunteers, our Family Center
netted $7007.00! It was our largest and most successful fund raiser ever. Our mini grant
fund has been established and applications are already coming in.
Again, the Silent Auction Committee, ECFC staff, parents and children are very grateful
for your support.
Sincerely,
~~~
Susanna Sidoti Gorodisher
'96 Silent Auction CoChair
.
rn~~
Margaret Simmet
'96 Silent Auction CoChair
e
14480 60th Street North, Stillwater, MN 55082 (612)351-8350
~~~ "--~'~-',~. '-'-"""~'~;':"';';'''''''''''':'''''';:-'
'-~.~il"'f""-""",,::<,'
~
' '-,.,
. ..
.... ~~.~~ ..
, .-!~U'l~
~...=- --'
. .~ . Or.:' ~.I U--..'......
~.~
-=.--- Ai
, ,
WASHINGTON COUNTY
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION County Administrator
GOVERNMENT CENTER D @ @ @r I .
14900 61ST STREET NORTH. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006 'A !!!!!!Ii
612-430-6000 FacsimRe Machine 612-430-6017
NOV I 8 /996
James R. Schug
DATE:
Washington County Town Clerks, City Administrators, and
School Board Superintendents ~ 0 J .
Jim Schug, County Administrator ~
November 14, 1996 FYI
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County Survey
At the League of Local Governments meeting on October 29, 1996, Dr. Bill Morris
of Decision Resources, Limited presented the findings of the 1996 survey of
Washington County residents that we had contracted with his firm to conduct. The
report has many interesting findings that are of value not only to Washington County,
but also to the other local public jurisdictions.
At the League meeting, we agreed that upon our receipt of the Executive Summary
from Dr. Morris, we would share thIs information with all of the local units of
government in the County. Enclosed is a copy of the Executive Summary of this
report.
We also have a number of graphs and charts suitable for use in presentations. Copies
of these charts are available upon request. I will be briefly reviewing this information
at the November 20 meeting of town clerks, city managers, and school district
superintendents. For those of you who are able to attend that meeting, you can
. review the other materials to determine if you are interested in receiving a copy.
Others who are interested in requesting a copy should contact Bob Lockyear in the
Office of Administration at 430-6004.
We hope that you will find this information useful as you plan your various public
strategies.
lie
Enclosure
!e
cc:
Bob Lockyear
_rod Of! Rocydod P_
EaUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
@)
.-.
-"""":'"<,,... '.d_'.f'IIII"'lIl:P'-,,~_-.
f.) i..
e
Decision Resources, LId
November, J 996
rif.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1996 Survey of Washington County Residents
This study contains the results ofa telephone survey of750 randomly selected residents
of Washington County. Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers between
July 24 and August 16, 1996. The average interview took twenty-six minutes. In general,
random samples such as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of Washington
County residents within:f: 3.6 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases.
Washington County evidences a high residential mobility rate: twenty-nine percent of the
sample reported moving to the county during the past two years. The average residential
longevity was 9.1 years, with thirty-five percent of the sample reporting over twenty' years in the
county.
Household composition reflects an increasing number of school-aged children in the
lower grades. Thirty percent of the households contained seniors, while sixteen percent reported
the presence of an adult child. Thirty-nine percent of the households contained school-aged
children, while fifteen percent reported pre-schoolers iri residence. Countywide, the median
adult age was 44.0 years old, with twenty-two percent under the age of 35, and twenty-five
percent at least 55 years old. Educationally, the median Washington County resident had
graduated from college.
Occupationally, the County shows a tilt toward upscale White Collar households.
Professional-Technical job holders composed twenty-five percent of the sample, while Owner-
Manager households were nineteen percent. Blue Collar households were another twenty percent
and Clerical-Sales households totaled thirteen percent. Households headed by retirees were
seventeen percent of the sample. The median household income was found to be is $72,500,
substantially higher than the Metropolitan Area suburban norm.
Ninety-three percent owned their current residences. And, women outnumbered men by
eight percent in the sample.
I
I.
Ninety-six percent of the sample rated the quality of life as either "excellent" or "good" in
Washington County, a very strong rating and among the top that the researchers have
encountered. In fact, the forty-three percent "excellent" rating proved outstanding. There was a
good consensus about the quality of life across the area. When asked what they like about the
county, "exurban" characteristics -- nice people, openness ofland, small town ambience,
environment, and natural beauty -- were reported by fifty-one percent of the sample. "Suburban"
characteristics, such as location, schools, strong neighborhoods, parks and recreation offerings,
and smoothly run government accounted for thirty-three percent of the responses. If this high
,......,,,-"'
Deci~ion Resources, LId
Nover,nber, 1996
e
quality oflif~is to be mai!ltained in the future, itwill be paiticularly importantto avoid..
over-dey~19pment and to preserve open areas and parks. . A balanced approach to these
long-range planning issues was clearly recommended.
When queried about their dislikes, fourteen percent of the respondents reported none - a
very large proportion of "boosters." Taxes, at sixteen p~rcent, uncontrolled growth, at eighteen
percent, and traffic congestion, at ten percent, led the list. No other factor was mentioned by at
least five percent of the sample. In looking to the future, twenty-nine percent were most
concerned about growth, while sixteen percent pointed to school funding and twelve percent, to
high taxes. Crime was also a concern mentioned by nine percent of the sample. Current
concerns, then, mushroomed into future fears.
Fifty-one percent saw future population growth and development as a generally "bad
thing," while thirty-three percent saw it as a "good thing." Over-population and excessive
growth rate were two key negatives, while growing tax base was the key positive associated with
growth and development. In a shift from previous years, fifty-seven percent favored the future
use of cluster zoning, while thirty-five percent opposed it.
. ..Empowerment, the ability to influence the way.the County runs things, proved to be a
minor problem. Thirty-nine percent of the residentS felt they could not impact county
government. But, even so, both the Washington County Board and the County Staff received
very high favorable ratings. Sixty-nine percent approved of the job of the County Board, only..
eleven percent expressed dissatisfaction. Similarly, fifty-six percent rated the job of Staff as
"excellent" or "good," while nineteen percent were more critical. Both of these ratings were
distinct improvements from the 1993 study and among the highest within the State of Minnesota.
Fairly significant nwnbers also reported high levels of knowledge about the County
Government enterprise. Thirty-two percent knew a "great deal" or a "fair amount" about the
work of the County Board. Twenty percent had "quite a lot" or "some" fIrst-hand contact with
the County Staff. "Hard" name recognition of Board Members was also high ~ ranging from
fifteen percent to an incredible forty-two percent.
Washington County taxpayers were generally negative in their reactions to taxes. When
queried about their willingness to sustain higher property taxe~ to maintain county services, the
sample decisively split 65% - 25% in opposition. Similarly, residents proved very prudent in
their support of new or expanded programs requiring additional property taxes: they strongly
rejected a new golf course, while favoring further action on contamination of natural resources,
providing services to the elderly in their homes, and hiring additional law enforcement officers.
Residents did not principally attribute property tax increases to the county; instead, fifty-two
percent pointed to local school districts.
Page 2
e
e
Decision Resources, Lid
November, 1996
Residents .took different approaches to the issues of drugs and gangs inWashmgtori :".'
County. A fifty,:"three percent majority fayored an educational approach over an enforcement..'..
approach in dealing with drugs and illicit substances; however, they reversed that preference in
dealing with gangs and gang related crimes, with a fifty-eight percent majority in favor of an
apprehension approach. Even so, only thirty-seven percent rated gangs to be a "very serious" or
"somewhat serious" problem in Washington County, with most residents associating drug crimes
and vandalism with these groups.
An impressive seventy-four percent felt there were no places in their community where
they would feel unsafe walking alone at night. Eleven percent would feel unsafe "everywhere,"
while four percent pointed to parks. Twenty-seven percent had called the 911 dispatch center for
emergency services during the past two years; a very solid ninety-three percent rated them as
"helpful."
Thirty-two percent had visited the Washington County Government Center or another
county facility during the past year. The Court House, at twenty percent, licensing bureau, at
twenty-four percent, and property taxation office, at fourteen percent, were the most popular
destinations. A solid eighty-four percent rated the service provided as "excellent" or "good," and
ninety-two percent had no difficulty fmding their way around the facility. Similarly, thirty-three
percent had telephoned a Washington C~unty facility during the past twelvemonths. The same
three departments wer~ pointed to the most frequently. Eighty-eight percent felt the amount of .
time to reach a helpful staff member was reasonable, and eighty-three percent rated the service
received as "excellent" or "good." Thirty-one percent had left a message on "voice mail," and by
three-to-one reported satisfaction with the way their call was handled by the automated system.
These service evaluations were among the highest in the Metropolitan Area.
Seventy-eight percent rated the ease of accessing county services as "excellent" or
"good," while fifteen percent were more critical. Consistent with this high satisfaction level,
sixty-one percent were unwilling to pay additional property taxes for easier access to county
services. The potential use of credit cards to pay for county services intrigued only five percent '
of the sample. Likewise, only nine percent would be likely to use an automated payment or
electronic transfer from their savings or checking accounts to pay for their property taxes.
Seventy-two percent visited the license centers in Stillwater, Woodbury, or Forest Lake.
The Stillwater facility drew the largest numbers, at fifty-two percent, while thirty-two percent
. visited Woodbury and sixteen percent went to the Forest Lake License Center. A solid eighty-
nine percent rated the quality of service at the license centers as "excellent" or "good, while ten
percen~ w~re ~ore critical, particularly about slow service. Ninety-seven percent felt the centers
were easy to find, and eighty-eight percent regarded the waiting time for service as reasonable. . ~.
Forty-one percent of the sample indicated they would be more likely to use Washington County
e
Page 3
Decision Resources, Lid
November, 1996
e
license servic~s if they had extended hours"; they'especiallylikedexterided hoUrS to 7:00p~,fon
weeknights. and Saturday morning hoUrs, But; they would be Willing to'pa.y'on average 'only '(:;~',:;.
$10.56 per year to fund this hours expansion."" ; . . . .,.
A series of more specialized services were considered. Fifty-nine percent needed service
or information on driver's licenses, license plates, or stickers. Stillwater, Cottage Grove, and
Woodbury were the locations most often mentioned for obtaining these services or information.
Only seven percent of the respondents reported calling for service or information on taxes or
applications for tax benefits from special programs. Even though the number was small, a high
ninety percent rated the service they received as "excellent" or "good." Of the twenty-six percent
of the households in the county containing veterans, only sixteen percent were aware of county
veteran services. Again, though the number was small, eighty-four percent expressed satisfaction
with the service provided. Eighty-one percent reported visiting a Washington County Library
during the past year, particularly the Cottage Grove, Woodbury, and Stillwater Branches. As a
comparison, forty-three percent had visited libraries outside of Washington County, especially
the Saint Paul Public Libraries and the Ramsey County Public Libraries. If more funds were
available for library services, seventy;,.seven percent would prioritize acquiring books~ reference
items, and other library materials over hiring more pers,onIlel to expand operating hoUrs. '
'\','c,'-. .
, . ~ .'.. .. :
,". ," ...'. ".c .'.......j.".,..., ....
- . ' -':~
. ~"., -. ... .' . .,~. . .~
,'. .
. ~'_. ~:....'~. , . ,-.. .J .' ".
Respondents prioritized.'~openspace presei'Vation"as the top environmental pnority 'ror.': -:;;.:,
action in Washington County; forty-six percent chose this from a list of six issues. "Wetlands
protection," "waste management," and "ground watetprotection" were VirtUally tied. for second
place, chosen by between thirty-seven percent and thirty-nine percent. Sixty-four percent rated
the quality of water in local area streams, lakes, and ponds as "excellent" or "good," while thirty_
two percent rated them lower. In considering wetlands, seventy-nine percent registered
opposition to draining and filling these areas in their local community.
In examining solid waste management, thirty-eight percent were unsure about the
destination of their garbage once it had been picked up by a hauler. Prior to the survey, forty-
eight percent were aware of the County's resource recovery efforts.' In spite or its low awareness
level, once the program had been explained, ninety-three percent considered it to be "very
important" or "somewhat important."
Twenty-five percent of the sample reported being hooked up to a septic tank. Of septic
tank owners, seventy-one percent had training or education in the maintenance of their septic
systems. About two-thirds reported pumping out their septic tank at least every two years. Of
the nine percent who pumped out their septic tanks at most every four years, forty-seven percent
indicated they would be likely to pump their system every three years if the County notified them
at that time. '
Page 4
e
.
fl. "
Decision Resources, Ltd.
e November, 1996
",Sixty~seve~ percent wereabl~ to provide a definition of "watershecL", Twenty-seven' ~.
percent thought it collected run-9ff, while fourteen percent pointed to a preserve for water and .'
fourteen percent thought it controlled water flow. Sixty-three percent felt the major function of a
wetland was to protect habitats and wildlife.
Only twenty-two percent felt there were areas of the county in which they experienced
problems with the Washington County road system. No site, however, was pointed to by more
than three percent. Slow traffic, potholes~ construction, no grades, and excessive stoplights were
the key complaints. In evaluating the rebuilding of roads, residents prioritized relieving
congesti<?!1,~~st, ,ap,depvironme:ntal impact. There was no great consensu~ about revenue
sources to fund road projects and programs: thirty-two percent favored a gas tax increase, while
eighteen percent preferred a driver's license fee increase. However, a consensus was clearly seen
on toll roads: seventy-five percent opposed them.
Forty-one percent of the surveyed households currently had a modem-equipped personal
computer. An additional sixteen percent reported access to a modem-equipped computer. Of
those with an access to modems, fifty-eight percent currently accessed data bases or bulletin
boards. At this time, only eighteen percent reported they were "very likely" to .use a modem- '.
equipped cOPlputer to obtain Washington CountY information; a higher percentage, twenty-three
percent, ,were "v.ery likely" .to use it to obtain Washington Library County Library information.
Newspapers, at seventy-two percent, were the principal source of infonnation about
county government and its activities. Newsletters ranked second at eight percent, followed by
the "grapevine," at six percent. When asked about preferred communications sources, forty-five
percent pointed to newspapers while thirty-four percent cited mailed newsletters. The present
county newsletter had been received by only forty-eight percent of the sample, a receipt rate
unchanged from the 1993 study. Sixty-five percent of those receiving the publication reported
regularly reading "all of it" or "most of it," and seventy-five percent rated its content highly.
In summary, Washington County residents are content with their quality of life and view
the County in a generally positive light. If there is one concern about the future it lies in
balancing the natural beauty of the area with population growth and economic development. The
County was seen as an excellent and efficient provider of services and is given a major portion of
the credit for the smooth functioning of the area. Washington County goveniment and staffwas
viewed favorably by the general population and exceptionally well by those who have had
contact with them. An issue for the future, though, will be further increasing that knowledge
base; in particular, the newsletter may need to be reconsidered in terms of its impact. However,
this issue was not the critical concern found in the 1989 study of the area, since strides in the
right direction have been made. Better communications, currently, was one area which can be
improved further -- and should be, since greater approval and connectedness will follow.
e
Page 5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
2:00
2:00
2:20
2:30
2:40
to
3:10
3:10
to
4:10
4:15
to
4:45
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Dennis C. Hegberg
~istrict 1
***NOTICE CHANGE IN TIl\1E***
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
NOVEMBER 26, 1996, 2:00 P.M.
Mary Hauser
District 2
Wally Abrahamson
~istrict 3
Myra Patereon
~istrict 4
Dave Engstrom
~istrict 6/Chalr
Roll Call
Consent Calendar
General Administration - J. Schug, County Administrator
A. Recognition of Retiring District Court Judge Howard R. Albertson
B. Policy on County Comments on Proposed Tax Increment Financing Districts
C. Update on Proposed Washington County Display at the AMC Conference
Discussion from the Audience
YuilOrs may share their concems with the County Board of Commissi01Jl!rs on any item nOl On lhe agenda. The Chair will direcl the
County AdminislrOlor 10 prepare responses 10 your concems. You are encouraged nollO be repetitious of previous speakers and 10
limil your address 10 jive minules.
Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
This period of lime shall be used by the Commissioners 10 repOTf 10 the full Board on commillee activities, make commems on maners
ofimeresl and infonnation, or raise questions 10 !he slilff. This action is nol imended 10 resull in subslantive board aclion during
this lime. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a fulure board meeting.
Board Correspondence
Adjourn
Workshop with Public Works Department - Room looB
Use of Cottage Grove Ravine Park by the City of Cottage Grove
W.orkshop with H.E.L.M. Department - Room looB
Household Hazardous Waste
Workshop with Office of Administration - Room looB
Review of Legislative Package
.................................................................
Date
MEETING NOTICES
Committee
Time
Location
Planning Advisory Committee
Mosquito Control Ex. Commission
Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board
Washington County Government Center
2099 University Ave. W. . St. Paul
2099 University Ave. W. - St. Paul
7:00 p.m.
8:00 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
As8istive n.tening device. .,.. eveilllble for u. in the County 808fd Room.
" yoU need es8i.tence dUll '" diabi/ity or ""'guege berrier, pIea_ CIJ//43D-6000 (TOO 439.3220J
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
NOVEMBER 26, 1996
e
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
ITEM
Administration
A. Approval of the November 12, 1996 Board Meeting minutes.
Auditor-Treasurer
B. Approval of resolution classifying parcel 27456-2000 as non-conservation.
Community Services
C. Approval of 1996 agreement between Salvation Army Lakewood Adult Day
Care and Washington County to provide adult day care and respite care for
elderly and disabled adults.
D. Approval of 1996 agreement between Margaret S. Parmly Residence and
Washington County to provide adult day care and respite care for elderly and
disabled adults.
E. Approval of 1996 agreement between Hudson Medical Center and Washington
County to provide respite care for elderly and disabled adults.
Public Works
F. Approval of resolution awarding a contract for vehicle fuel supply for 1997 to
Kath Brothers Fuel Oil co. and Rollins Oil Company as the lowest responsible
bidders conditioned upon the approval and full execution of a contract as
required by law.
G. Approval to amend the Parks Section 1997 Fees and Charges Schedule to
rescind the boat launch fee.
Resource Recovery .
H. Approval of resolution, Ramsey/Washington County Resource Recovery
Project's 1997 Operating Budget in the amount of $9,991 ,082.
*Consent Calendar items are generally defmed as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved
in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
e
e
'METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its advisory and standing committees, and
three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings
should be directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro Information Line at
229-3780 and by computer modem, through the Twin Cities Computer Network at 337-5400. Comments on Cou~cil issues
can be made by electronic mail at data.center@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public Comment Line at 291-6536. The
Council's new web page is at: www.metrocounci1.org
DATE: November 22, 1996
WEEK OF: November 25 - November 29
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Transportation Committee - Monday, Nov. 25, 4 p.m., Chambers. The committee will consider:
procurement of small buses for Metro Mobility and Transit Redesign; transit provider assistance agreements
for calendar year 1997; Minnesota Valley Transit Authority 1996 budget amendment; City of Minneapolis
Transportation Plan; regional fleet identification graphics; and other business.
Managed Competition Review Committee - Monday, Nov. 25, 4 p.m., Room lB. The committee will
consider: Blue Lake/Seneca Solids Project; identification of managed competition issues; and other
business.
Proposed Southeast Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Work Group and Community Advisory
Task Force _ Tuesday, Nov. 26, 3-6 p.m., Metro 94, Suite 32, 455 Etna St., St. Paul. .
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Committee- Wednesday, Nov. 27,8:30 a.m., Room lA.
THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - Thursday and Friday, Nov. 28 and 29. Council offices are closed.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul. Meeting times and
agenda are subjectto change. For more information or confirmation of meetings, call 291-6447, (TDD 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 for news of Council actions and coming meetings.
TENTATIVE MEETINGS THE WEEK OF DECEMBER 2 TIIROUGH DECEMBER 6, 1996
Community Development Committee- Monday, Dec. 2, Noon, Room lA.
Joint Meeting: Finance Committee, Community Development Committee and Metropolitan Parks
and Open Space Commission - Monday, Dec. 2, 3 p.m., Room lA.
Finance Committee - Monday, Dec. 2,4 p.m., Room 2A.
e
Truth in Taxation Public Hearing - Monday, Dec. 2, 6 p.m., Chambers.
Metropolitan Council Litigation Review Committee - Monday, Dec. 2, 5 p.m. or immediately following
the Finance Committee, Room 2A.
~ .' .', "~'" ,- " . . ,. .
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee to the Transportation Advisory Board - Wednesday,
Dec. 4, 9 a.m., Chambers.
e
Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee. Wednesday, Dec. 4, 1 p.m., Room lA.
Metropolitan Council - Thursday, ~ec. 5,4 p.m., Chambers.
Public Hearing: 1997 Work Program and Budget - Thursday, Dec. 5, 6 p.m., Chambers.
Public Hearing: 1997-2001 Capital Improvement Program and 1997 Capital Budget - Thursday, Dec.
5, 6:30 p.m., Chambers.
Metropolitan Radio Board - Friday, Dec. 6, 9 a.m., Metropolitan Counties Government Center, 2099
University Ave. St Paul.
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACn.ITIES COMMISSION
The Committee of the Whole - Tuesday, Nov. 26, 1 p.m., HHH Metrodome, Halsey Hall Room, 900 S.
Fifth St., Minneapolis. The committee will consider presentation of background analysis on the following
topics: naming rights, including recent history and description of contract terms tbroughout the country;
methods of financing/potential sources. Analysis of potential revenue streams of income available in this
market and other markets for new facilities; public ownership of professional teams; history of team
movement for both professional football and professional baseball including why teams left and packages
offered to obtain new teams; status and costs of stadiums including impact of convertible or retractable
covered stadiums; status of federal legislation regarding the movement of professional franchises; public
contnbutions to professional sports in Minnesota-historical perspective; and status ofNHL return to
Minnesota.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN
55415. All meetings are held in the Commission office conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting
times and agendas occasionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Nancy
Matowitz, 335-3310..
_I
2
. ..:>...':;:._.,....,'__.,"'.~"".'".'"':'i"'_...~I'..'...__..".~" ""1.""" ""1 """"
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region. Planning for the Future
e
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON 1997 WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET, 1997-2001
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND 1997 CAPITAL BUDGET
The Metropolitan Council will hold public hearings on the Council's proposed 1997 work
program and budget, the 1997-2001 capital improvement program and the 1997 capital
budget. These hearings will be as follows:
. Metropolitan Councll 1997 Work Program and Budget Hearing
6 p.m., Thursday, December 5, 1996
Metropolitan Council Chambers
Mears Park Centre
230 E. Fifth Street .
St. Paul, MN
. Metropolitan Councll 1997-1001 Capital Improvement Program and
1997 Capital Budget Hearing
6:30 p.m., Thursday, December 5, 1996
Metropolitan Council Chambers
Mears Park Centre
230 E. Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN
All interested person are encouraged to attend the hearings and offer comments. People
may register in advance to speak by calling 291-6554 or 291-0904 (TTY). Upon request,
the Council will provide reasonable accommodations to persons with disabilities.
Comments may also be submitted as follows:
Send written comments to: Richard Johnson, As~ciate Regional Administrator,
Metropolitan Council, Mears Park C~tre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101.
Fax comments to Mr. Johnson at 291-6358.
Record ~mments on the Council's Public Comment Line: 612/291-6536.
Send comments electronically to: data.center@metc.state.mn.us
Comments must be received by Noon, December 19, 1996.
Copies of the public hearing drafts of the Council's proposed 1997 work program and
budget, 1997-2001 capital improvement program and 1997 capital budget may be
obtained from the Council's Data Center by calling 291-8140 or 291-0904 (TTY).
e
These hearings are in addition to a December 2nd Truth-in- Taxation hearing scheduled for
the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Mosquito Control Commission.
230 EastFtfth Street St. Paul. MInnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TlY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780
An Equal Opportunity EmpIDyer
e
Lower St. Croix Planning Coordination Office
117 Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-439-7122
TO:
Local Governments
DATE:
Buck Malick, Chair, Lower St. Croix Planning Task Forced41
Kate Hanson, Planning coordinator/II
Tuesday, November 19, 1996
FROM:
Enclosed, you will find notes from the October 29 meeting of the Lower St.
Croix Planning Task Force.
We will take this opportunity to remind you of the next Task Force meeting
on December 4, 1996 on the topic of Riverway Zoning and Land Protection. The
meeting is at the Phipps Center for the Arts, 109 Locust Street, Hudson, WI, from
7-10 p.m. The agenda is:
I. Background Information on Riverway Zoning
* How riverway zone boundaries were established.
* How current zoning was developed.
* Role of zoning in riverway protection.
* Overview of regulations.
* How any changes in zoning will be handled with the update of the Lower
St. Croix National Scenic Riverway Management Plan.
II. Panel discussion: Representatives of local governments will discuss their
perspectives on administration of the riverway zoning ordinances.
III. Alternative Methods of Land Protection
* Scenic Easements
* Mississippi Headwaters Board Model of River Zoning
* Opportunities for Private Land Protection
IV. Discussion of Ideas to Carry Forward in Planning
We know this topic will be of interest to many local officials who may not
have attended previous Task Force meetings or workshops, and encourage you to
share this notice with others who might want to attend, such as zoning officials,
planning committees, and boards of adjustment.
e
\
it
e
Notes from Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force Meeting
October 29, 1996
Task Force Members Present: Buck Malick (Chairman), Kate Hanson
(Coordinator), Audrey Kelly, Linda Luckey, Tom Clarke, Michael
Hudec, Gary and Dottie Mau, Mark Kinders, Chuck Simpson, Bertha
Hall, Larry Kennedy, Terry Moe, Tony Andersen, Brian Adams, Steve
Johnson, Molly Shodeen, Kent Johnson, Nick Rowse, John Jansen,
Jurgen Weidling, Laura Reynods, Al Taylor, Jim Johnson.
Also Present: Elaine Rideout (NPS-Denver) Louise Bergeron
(Stillwater, MN), Mary Claire Olson (Hudson Area Chamber), Jessie
Meschievitz (MWBAC), Russell Eichman (Upper Mississippi Waterway
Assn, St. Paul).
Task Force Chairman Buck Malick convened the meeting and
distributed copies of "A Model Historic Preservation Ordinance for
Small Communities," published by the State Historical Society of
Wisconsin. This handout material was follow-up information from
the September 10 Task Force meeting. Buck also handed out an
invitation to a November 21 forum on growth and development in the
Lower St. Croix Valley. The forum, sponsored by the Minnesota-
Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission, will be at the Phipps Center
for the Arts.
Elaine Rideout distributed the' write-ups of the Lower St.
Croix "Potential Riverscape Management Areas" that were developed
by the Task Force at the September planning workshop. She explained
that, after having had time to review this after the workshop, the
planning team believes the management areal? need additional work in
order. to be more useful in defining a range of activities and
experiences for alternativ~s. In particular, she said, the task
force will have more flexibility in developing alternatives if we
have separate descriptions for land-based and water-based
activities and experiences. She said that the planning team could
do this additional work and bring it back to the Task Force for
review.
Jurgen Weidling voiced concern about separating land use from
water use, saying that land and water are one in the riverway and
should be treated as one. Buck suggested that we proceed with
developing the land/water descriptions in order to see what kind of
options they would provide for alternati ves- -and that if, on
review, the Task Force doesn't find it workable, we make further
changes. The. Task Force agreed that the planning team should
proceed with this.
;e
NOTE: Copies of the re-worked management area descriptions will be
mailed to the Task Force in late November. Others who would like to
see these updated descriptions can get copy from Kate Hanson, the
planning coordinator~ 612-439-7122. It is important to note that
1
~'c-,;.;;:;)\:,;"lR;:~~::r'::
the management area descriptions are < one tool that, along with
other information, will be used to develop management alternatives.
They outline concepts for how the ri verway could be managed
differently along different stretches. If you have questions,
please call Kate.
Elaine said the next newsletter will come out.in mid-November.
It will include the updated statements of purpose, significance and
exceptional resources; the landscape unit descriptions that were
developed at the September workshop, and an updated list of issues
that will be addressed in the Cooperative Management Plan.
Kate reviewed the upcoming meeting schedule: December 4 Task
Force meeting on riverway zoning and land protection; January 9
Task Force meeting on management areas and other material pertinent
to the upcoming alternatives workshop; and January 28-30 workshop
to develop alternatives..
Review of Issues List:
Task Force members reviewed an updated list of issues that
have been generated from all sources to date--including Task Force
meetings, planning workshops, responses to the May newsletter and
other correspondence. A subcommittee compiled this list (Buck
Malick, Bill Clapp, Terry Moe, Steve Johnson, Brian Adams, Elaine
Rideout, Mark Weekley, and Kate Hanson) . The updated list indicates
which issues will be addressed in the Cooperative Management Plan
and which will be addressed in the Watershed Stewardship Statement.
(Some issues will be addressed by both.)
Buck highlighted issues that needed clarification. Kate
clarified the intent of issue #13 and suggested that it be changed
to read, "Burial sites are not known and, thus, frequently not
protected when development occurs." Kate also said she had spoken
to the person who originated #14, who suggested that it be deleted
because it is encompassed by #12.
Buck Malick clarified Issue #18, "Opportunities may be lost to
develop recreational trails on both sides of the river, and at
river crossings." He said that it is important that local
government have the means to act on opportunies to acquire land
(through donation, easements, purchase, etc.) for more bicycle
routes and cross-country trails.
There was discussion about #10, "The St. Croix's fishery is
impacted by lack of management, recreational use, lack of knowledge
and commercial fishing." Concern was expressed for the negative
tone of this issue. We agreed that this statement is not meant to
be negative but rather indicate that there is a lack of knowledge
about the St. Croix's fishery, and that can have an impact on the
resource. This issue will be reworded accordingly.
2
,
t'
e
e
.
\
e
Russell Eichman commented on .issue #21, "Commercial navigation
and the related operation and maintenance of the nine-foot and
three-foot navigation channels can impact resource management
strategies, recreational 'use characteristics, _.,'~ aesthetics,
recreational boater safety and aquatic resources." He noted that
commercial navigation can impact, and be impacted Qy recreational
use. The issue will be modified accordingly.',.
Elaine emphasized that issues will serve as a checklist as
alternatives are developed for the Cooperative Management Plan.
NOTE: The list of issues will be published in the upcoming
newsletter.
Presentation: Tourism in the Lower St. Croix Valley, by Mark
Kinders, Chair, St. Croix Valley Tourism. Alliance and Public
Affairs Director, University of Wisconsin, River Falls (also a Task
Force member) .
Mark explained that the St. Croix Valley Tourism Alliance is
a bi-state regional tourism group. It's mission is: "To serve as an
educational resource for the history, culture and natural resources
of the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway, and to increase
the economic impact of tourism in our member communities through
cooperative promotion of the Scenic St. Croix Valley." ,'~~
Mark showed a series of graphics that indicate the economic
value of tourism in the Valley and characteristics of tourists. His
information included: tourism-sensitive sales, tourism jobs, travel
trends, what travelers are seeking, where visitors are from,
demographics (age, education, income, marital status, etc.),
reasons for visiting the St.. Croix, and visitor's likes and
dislikes.
Among the highlights of Mark's presentation, as it pertains to
Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway p+anning, are:
* The top four "likes" of 'St. 'Croix visitors are: relax and get
away from the city (50%), beautiful scenery (26%), 'enjoy
nature and the outdoors (26%), and peace/quiet/comfortable
(22%) .
* Top activities of visitors are: eating at restaurants (92%),
shopping/antiquing (82%), visit state/county parks (51%),
historical sites (46%), wildlife watching (45%) biking/hiking
(38%), museum or exhibits (34%), visit family & friends (33%),
water sports (28%), boat/sail (28%), festival or event (28%),
fish/hunt (21%).
*
-
Length of stay: 2-3 days (40%), 4-6 days (34%), 7-10 days
(12%) .
e
3
*
Amount spent on vacation: $250-399 (32%), under $100 (26%),
$100-249 (20%).
* Average visitor's profile: male & female, average age of 49.5,
high school graduate +, average household income of $46,800,
married, 2/3 have children.
* St. Croix Riverway total tourism jobs: 6,400.
* Tourist spending, 1993-94: Washington County, $59 million; St.
Croix County, $46.5 million; Polk Count:;y, $29.5 million;
Pierce County, $18 million; Chisago County, $12 million.
* Business and community leaders feel tourism promotion should
focus on the scenic natural beauty of the river, quaint small
towns, and historic aspects of the Riverway area.
In summary, Mark said that the data says people are coming
here because of the character of the valley, it's scenic and
natural values.
Note: Copies of Mark's graphics are available from Kate Hanson.
Discussion of Ideas To Carry Forward in Planning:
1. The natural features of the Riverway are the cornerstone for
tourism, and they should not be degraded.
2. The St. Croix Valley Regional Tourism Alliance mission statement
is good, and we should consider including it in the Cooperative
Management Plan.
3. Carrying capacity for tourism is a factor. What is the carrying
capacity? Too much tourism might not be good.
4. There are opportunities for the Riverway managing agencies and
the Tourism Alliance to work cooperatively.
5. Winter recreational opportunities in the Riverway could get 'more
attention (i.e. cross-country skiing, snowmobiling).
6. More should be done to provide bicycling opportunities- -for
example, pontoon boats could ferry bicyclists, bicycling could be
coordinated with special events.
4
i
e
e
I
11/22/96
09:20
CITY OF ORK PRRK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 577
(;102
. t
, .
e
AGENOA
CITY OF OAK PARR HEl:GHTS
TUESDAY, November 26, 1996 .- 6:00 P.M.
6: 00 AGENDA
I. council Workshop - Pro~oaAd 1997 e~dset
Enclosure 1, lB, le, 10, lE~ IF, & lG
7:00 AGENDA
I. Call To Order.
II. Visitor Comments. Questions. or C9ncerns
1. Request for Grant - Stillwater Area Chamber of
Commerce
Enclosure 2
2. Dave Piggot - Metro East Development Partnership -
Light Industrial Park Development
Enclosure 3
3. Us west/Lametti & Sons Construction - Explanation
for Water Shutoff -Monday, November 11, 1996
III. ~~~~t~t E~~~~
1. Police
2'. Utilities
3. Parks
4. Building
S. Administration
6. Cable
7. Water Management organizations
6. Recycling Award
Enclosure 4
9. Garbage Committee
10. OPR Business Group
IV. Consent Agen9~ (Roll Call Vote)
Enclosures 5, SB, 5C, 5D, & SE
V. Public Hearinq
1. Proposed Street Vacation - NSP
Enclosure 6
VI.
unfinisheg 2y~ess
1. Approval of Annual Auditing & Financial Services
Agreement - Tautges, Redpath, & Co.
Enclosure 7
le
2. Sunnyside Utility Easement
Enclosure 8
11/22/96
09:21
CITY OF ORK PRRK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 577
(;103
. ,
. .
e
VI I . ~w BuiJ.ness
1. Approval of Zoning Ordinance Summary
Enclosure 9
2. Ordinance Amending Section 401.01 of Chapter 401
to Add Section 401.01L, Parlimentary Procedure and
Voting
Enclosure 10
3. New St. River Bridge Discussion
VIII;
Correspondence
1. City Attorney Letter
Enc;lOBure 11
Adjournment: ,
The Council meeting will be closed for an update on pending
litigation.
I
e
, LIST OF BILLS
_ EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION 96-283
Ameridata
Ancom
Brekke, Thomas and Barbara
Burt, Timothy and Rosemary
Croix Oil Company
Deblon, Diane
Desch, Mark and Gloria
Halligan, Joseph
Jansens Cleaning Service
Jerome, Kim and Cort
Johnson, Gary and Robin
Johnson, Mitchell and Amy
LMC Insurance Trust
Loeffler, Mark
Magnuson, David
Miller, Douglas and Mary
Schaefer, Patrick and Carol
Schwab, Robert and Debra
Short Elliott Hendrickson
Simmons, William
Solheid, John and Dawn
Viking Office Products
Wagner, Michael
Washington County
Wash. Co. SWCD
Wicklander-Zulawski and Assoc.
'.
I
Service Call
Portable Radio Battery
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Oil
Health Insurance
Parking Lease and Maintenanc
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Maintenance Agreement
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Deductible
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Legal Services
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Annexation Trunk Facilities
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Misc. Office Supplies
Refund Ice Arena Donation
Shared Equipment Project
Lily Lake Monitoring
Criminal Interviews
. . 7.'~'1,"''';;'_4'''~:<lIIIIiir:~~'''':'-_::
44.00
84.88
210.00
100.00
202.59
377.19
742.30
365.00
1 ,097.07
1,095.00
100.00
550.00
2,500.00
300.00
7,312.08
200.00
365.00
50.00
5,089.77
365.00
160.00
62.25
333.00
875.00
260.00
349.00
,
~ ,..' p
DOWNTOWN PARKING SYMPOSIUM
.
December 4,1996 - 5:30 pm
Lumber Baron's Hotel
Agenda
f'i.t
1. Introduction of Downtown Parking Commission Members
2. Purpose of Downtown Parking Commission and recent work (Karl Ranum)
3. Downtown parking conditions.
The facts (Steve Russell)
Operations (Dennis Pasket)
4. What can be done? (Jim Laskin)
6. Discussion
y\ ~ l~ I~ \ L^ 1
~~t~
5. How can we pay for it? (Jim Laskin)
7. Next follow up meetings January 8,1997.
. Note: The Parking Commission will review the questionnaire results and comments
from this meeting and prepare a Downtown Parking Improvement Program including
funding sources and specific projects for presentation at the January 8th meeting. Plan
to attend.
.
'.~. .
-;'"".. '<'".0;:.-"
." ,
..
.-
.
.
.,. .... ' -
WHAT CAN BE DONE?
Better Signage
to direct drivers to parking lots and clearly indicate what is public parking.
_ Better rationalize parking timesllocations
reduce the number of time options and optimize convenience for shoppers.
- Use existing parking fully
pave, strip and landscape ground lots, construct lot on city owned Aiple property
when available.
- Build parking structure
possible sites: Old use site or Olive and Second Streets.
Institute parking lot circulator
to move people around downtown and better access to Riverview and North Main
lots.
. "--'.. ._.......-~_.._- -~.
-......-....-..~--..
....~ __ ~_. _...1~" '_. ....._. ~.,...:. .,.
,~:,--
~,.~cf,.::-.~~~~--::;~~~-: .
..,- .~ . .
.~-, .
v . '
HOW CAN WE PAY FOR PARKING?
.-
Create downtown parking district and collect parking fee based on number of
parking spaces required by businesses.
Example: 270 businesses
4,235 parking demand
1,136 spaces provided
3,099 parking fees
3,099 x $30 a space per year = $92,970
_ Sales tax on all sales of food or beverage (needs special legislation). Estimated
sales $25 million 1 % tax = $250,000 per year.
Pay parking in high-use, long-term areas (South Main Lot #1 and River Lot #2) 200
spaces capture $50,000 to $60,000 per year.
_ Tax increment financing. A development project in the use lot could generate TIF
that could be used for construction of a public parking structure.
_ Tooth Fairy option. 'The Chambers get together and arrange for the Tooth Fairy to
come to town and solve the parking problem 'overnight.
.
.
... . .,~_.-.- ...~~:--..._&
... '. ----;--.--:- -.-.- ':.;.~-.-.,..__..,_.........t----"-'--'~T_~__._'..___'"~'_'_.._'''
---..---........--
_.-_....:.. '.': -.-: -,~_____-'-. .~..,-. 4.:::''':'':':'!.._:..:.__'''';''::'_-", _-.
l.,j ~ I II I I ... I I I I' II " ,,' ..", ,
.l"j a .4
.,' l " ,". ,.~ ..
,'I-ocation
#Spaces
Parking ramp
. Possible Location
1. UBC
, 2. Olive/Second
3. Mulberry /Second
4. Water & RR tracks between Mulberry & Myrtle
5. South Main
350 spaces to
500 spaces
Parking Lots (surface)
City owned Aiple leased property
River lot extended from Myrtle to Yacht Club
Mulberry and Second
Water and Mulberry
200 spaces
100
20
80
Other Improvements
Better sig nage
Parking lot circulator (trolley)
o
9-
750-900
Total
Funding Sources
Parking fees (meters, permits) (est. 200 spaces),
Parking district ($30/space)
. Sales tax - food and beverages (1 %)
TIF#7 ,
Studies
Prepare plan for city use of Aiple leased property 1997
,
I.
iO._ -..;..._-...:- .
~ .'.~--:::,," ':.'~i.:" '~.!..''''.''''':''.-""",~,.;",.
Est. $
{"
$3.5 - 5 million
$250,000
$150,000
$100,000 .
$200,000
$ 20,000
$100,000
$3.85-5.35 million
$50,000 - $60,000
$90,000
$250,000
?
$20,000
....... ".
.;..:f;~: ~.~-.
. _""'---- ~',.. o.
\ --~N
Sources:
......
~c---\
Commu.nily Development I \\
oepartment ~
~# -,----\
G5.~1EOf<<:llDGES \ _....
Feet
November 24,1996
o 150 300 450 600
----'
,:,.,;..;;'.".:"
City of
~aj,
Downtown Parking Survey
~end:
t:i1J Parking Commission District
N Parking District Boundary
CD Public Parking Lots
e Leased Public Parking Lots
80 Parking Spaces/Lot
. 500-599'\
. 400 - 499 \ Additional
. 300 - 399 ) Parking
=: ~gg: ~~~ / ~:~~
[J 0-99 /
o Parking Space Surplus
Parking Survey Results
1) !l
'C
'&i e-
o :::I
C :gl !Q
0 2' Cl ~
'0;
'E Cl :g ~I ,51 8
C
:g III i!' I IE
0. ~I ~I'~
III 0
0. :gl
.s -' ~I 2'
,Y
~ :is :::I' :g
.Q ii III
'C :::I :::I
0. 0. 0.
1 234 S 6 7 .
P""'ingDlalJlcl
~
~ -"'!fl
" V" >
. \ s;,!
I ~)
"\
002SW88A.....p [)n9'Ib,J.ry H111lJ*- ~f\Sig"'. "-'"_.1996_ (ph) &1~'.1J18
City of
~te~
Downtown Parking Lots
Legend:
e Leased Public Parking Lots
80 Parking SpaceslLot
Public Parking Lots: Total Spaces:
O South Main Street Lot 102
2 Iuondicap specos
River Lot (Nelson to Chestnut)
A 67 permR spaces 97
V 29 4-I1our spaces
I handicap space
A Reeds Lot (North of Freight House)
W 1 handicap space 47
llo8dklg space ~ .
~ River Lot (Chestnut to Myrtle) 45
V 45 4-hour spaces
A River Lot (Myrtle to Mulberry)
W NOlO: 30
Additional spaces avaYable aftet conslrudion.
Maple Island Lot
A 49 4-hour spaces n
W 26 permit spaces
2 handicap spaces
. Water Street Lot
Note:
Eas1 sidals gravel.
84
~ North Main Street Lot
~ 3 handicap spaces
101
~ Mulberry & Second Street Lot
. Note:
Unmarked gravallol
16
~ Lot North of Lowell Inn
W lluondlcap space
30
oICI Olive & Second Street Lot
~ 2 Iuondicap spaces
48
Rlvervlew Upper (a) & Town (b) Lot
4Irl. (a) 81 spaces (4 handicap) 161
"" (b) 59 spaces (2 hand"ocap)
41h _0121 spaces
Total:
838
N
A
November 25, 1996
100 0 100 200 300400 500 600
1"""'-
Feet
"____ --..-,".'''_m"..____~~,-
Downtown Parking Questionnaire
December 4, 1996 -
ISTIONS .
. _at would you like to see done in the next 18 months to improve downtown Stillwater's parking situation?
1. Better signage to direct drivers to all available parking in the downtown. Cost $20,000.
Yes No
2. Better maintenance of city owned parking lots and landscaping? Cost $ ?
Yes No
3. Paving and landscaping of city owned gravel parking lots? Cost $250,000
Yes No
4. Develop a parking lot circulator/trolley to help utilize parking lots outside of downtown and circulate people
around downtown? Cost $100,000 per season plus cost oftrolley(s) (6 months).
Yes No
What would you like to see done to help improve the downtown par1cing situation in the next five years?
. Develop parking on the Aiple property Gust south.of town) as part of its riverfront park development? 150?
_spaces created. Cost $220,000. .
Yes No
2. Build a 500 car parking structure on the south end oftown? Cost $3.5-5 million
Yes No
3. Develop the parking lot circulator/trolley?
Yes No
How would you like to have this paid for?
Number 1-4, 1 being best, 4 being least liked
_create a parking district
_ impose a sales tax
_ TIF money used for parking structure
_Pay parking at south end of town
.e write other thoughts and comments below or on back
~~t,~~:;:;~:{,t:{>,...., ~.
~
'"."".~~"'~.-._.--"....,~., -.,
LEGISLATIVE ASSOCIATES, INC.
.~. '!,...'" ~~.
. ; .:-~:1r,~'~::;~':i;~~:.:__
''-''''-~;&'t~ : l - .
~~~"C,,~ .
~:'::.>_1-'~: .. ~'-.~~-... ~...;"'.,'..
..
e
Washington Office:
1101 30th Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
(202) 62~4356
Fax (202) 625-4363
~--~
December 2, 1996
. .
Met with Congressional staff of Luther, Grams, and Wellstone
to discuss what was going to be needed in 1997. Met with
Congressman ~ohn Meyers, Chairman of Energy and Water
Appropriations to thank him for his assistance this year. Invited
him to come to Stillwater to see the levee project. Met with Tom
Bevill, ranking _member, of Appropriations to thank him. He is
retiring this year.' 52 hours
B. Local/State Levee Work
Continued meetings with the Corps, SEH, and State of Minnesota
re: needs for additional funding, the DNR budget for 1997,
Governor's staff, House and Senate Legislative staff planning for
additional Fy1997 funding. 31 hours
C. Armory Project - Washington, D.C. and State:
Working with the State to get them moving on the development of
plans and spec for the Stillwater Armory. I have continued contacts
in Washington with DOD and the National Guard Bureau.
We are now listed on the DOD/FYDP which is progress. Continued
work with General LeBlanc, Major Ous, and others re Armory plans
and specs. 18 hours
D. State Levee Appropriation:
,e
Working with DNR on 1997-98 budgets. -
D. Bridge Issue
8 hours
140 hours
"....- '~~114~'_"_"_"";~,,,,,,,
t
.
;
Page 2.
E. Service Fees:
Hours of Service During Billing Period: 249 hours
Contract provides for billing under A, B, C, of 63 hours @ $65
per hour.
Expenses:
LAI paid for one Washington, D.C. trip-on behalf of the City: Costs
included airfare, hotel, transportation, overnight mailings, ground
transportation and items not covered by $100 expense allowance
totaled$ 1,486.53 during the month of November.
City Expenses billed (telephone. fax. copying. ground trans..)
~Q~P
Edwin E. Cain, LAI
Total Fees for Services
rz~.6
/Oae
',~1iil"i?'~, ~~~ "C
e
$4,095.00
100.00
$ 4,195.00
e
""
...
e
November 14, 1996
STILLWATER TOWN BOARD MEETING
Town Hall
7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson David Johnson; Supervisors Louise Bergeron,
Sheila-Marie Untiedt and David Francis. Also, Planner
Meg McMonigal, Engineer Paul Pearson and Attorney Tom
Scott.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P Bergeron/Francis moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(4 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Francis/Untiedt moved to approve the 10/24/96 Town
Board Meeting Minutes as written. (4 ayes)
M/S/P Francis/Bergeron moved to approve the 10/28/96 Stillwater Township
Budget Meeting Minutes as written. (4 ayes)
M/S/P' Bergeron/Francis moved to approve the 11/6/96 Stillwater Town Board
Meeting Minutes as written regarding interviews of public works applicants.
(4 ayes)
M/S/P Francis/Bergeron moved to approve the 11/7/96 Stillwater Town Board
Canvas of Election Meeting Minutes as written. (4 ayes)
3. TREASURER-
1. Claims #1278 through #1329 were approved for
payment.
2. Monthly balances reported.
3. M/S/P Untiedt/Francis' moved to adopt the
1997 Budget with the addition of an amount
for the Town Ha1l upgrade. (4 ayes)
4 . AT TORN E Y -
1. Will check further regarding when the Township
elected officials, who were elected at the
General Election on November 5, 1996, will
start their new terms.
2. Recycling Contract was sent to T.M.T. and not
back .yet with signatures.
3. A resolution will be forthcoming at the next
meeting stating that the Chair and Clerk are
to sign plats.
4. Curbside Garbage Contract will be sent to
Larson Hauling.
5. Due to the Judge not being available, the
Rivard hearing has been put off until February.
e 5. ESTELLE PROPERTY - M/S/P Francis/Bergeron moved to authorize the lot
line adjustment requested on the Estelle Property. (4 ayes)
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 11/14/96
Page Two
Deeds were stamped.
6. BARCODING SERVICE - M/S/P Bergeron/Untiedt moved to authorize Dave
Swanson to do barcoding of Township mails at $15.00 twice a year and It
per label. (4 ayes)
It is understood that Mr. Swanson will supply a- letter stating that our
mailing list will not be distributed to anyone.
e
7. COVENANTS - ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL - Residents of Stonebridge Subdivision
were present to ask for help so they will know at the start of permitting
procedures about anything effecting their covenants.
The Township will explore how we can assist the notification process before
the County starts issuing permits.
8. HUNTING - PUBLIC LAND - Gisela Ordahl was present to express concern
from residents about information from the Sheriff's Department that hunting
is allowed on Stillwater Township's public lands.
A letter and Hunting Ordinance will be sent to the County Sheriff requesting
that he notify his people regarding the correct information. No Hunting on
Public Lands in Stillwater Township!
No Hunting sign will be installed at the Township Park at Stonebridge North
Subdivision.
9. PLANNER-
1. McMillan C.U.P. - Residential Kennel Permit _
M/S/P Francis/Bergeron moved approval of a
C.U.P. for a Residential Kennel Permit for
Suzanne McMillan subject to: .
1. six (6) adult dogs maximum are permitted;
2. a site plan showing the outdoor kennel ~nd
run locations at a 1"=100' scale and a
location map at 1"=200' be submitted;
3. the number of kennels and square footage
of kennel space is not increased;
4. the legal description is clarified; and
5. the dogs are to be kept in a kennel or
fenced area or under the direct control
of the handler.
(4 ayes)
2. Hunter's Ridqe -
Drawing of their proposed monument sign was
presented.
M/S/P Bergeron/Francis moved that in future
include, as part of the Subdivision Checklist,
a verification of signage while the property is
being developed. (4 ayes)
3. Wind Generator -
The qu~stion of putting a wind generator on a
property in Stillwater Township was discussed.
A Building Permit and height restrictions will
most likely be necessary.
e
--_... ~-_____.__L~,..,;.,,~...._..,.__. .........._....~.........:-:~."__''''.~,~ ._~_._.,_.. ,.,
~-
,.
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 11/14/96
Page Three
e
4. Scott Roberts -
He has been notified of his escrow balance.
He will be told again.
10. ENGINEER -
1. Stonehenqe Subdivision -
The trees have not been removed. The
Engineer will revisit the subdivision
in spring and revise his punch list.
If the trees are not moved by May 1,
1997, the Township will relocate them
and deduct the money from Mr. Wahl in's
escrow balance.
11. CRYSTEEL CREDIT - Louise Bergeron will continue to phone them about
reimbursement for the remaining part and labor.
12. SNOW READINESS - The equipment is ready and personnel being trained.
13. EQUIPMENT REPAIR - Several repairs needed were outlined.
14. NEWSLETTER - Suggestions were forthcoming fora December Newsletter.
15. MEETING PAY - A discussion about meeting reimbursement ensued. It will
be brought up "at the next meeting so a fair policy can be set.
16. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
Approved
e
~'::o..;.;I~'.i.;.Z:A"'''''':I~"-".Tt'''~.~,;:;'''':'',;:.;','.".'_,,,,;~r; "'.... .
"...,..;->7..~'~;
\
I
.
e
e
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council. its advisory and standing committees, and
three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings
should be directed to the appropnate organization. Meeting infonnation is also available on the Metro Infonnation Line at
229-3780 and by computer modem, through the Twin Cities Computer Network at 337-5400. Comments on Council issues
can be made by electronic mail at data.center@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public Comment Line at 291-6536. The
Council's new web page is at: www.metrocounci1.org
DATE: November 27, 1996
WEEK OF: December 2 - December 6
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Community Development Committee- Monday, Dec. 2, Noon, Room lA. The committee will consider:
Highway 96 Regional Trail master plan review; Snail Lake Regional Park master plan amendment-Vadnais
-Sucker Lakes site; GIS cost and data sharing agreements--general provisions for Scott Co. and revision of
general provisions for Dakota Co.; Livable Communities incentive account recommendations; Livable
C9mmunities demonstration account recommendations; and other business.
Joint Meeting: Finance Committee, Community Development Committee and Metropolitan Parks
and Open Space Commission - Monday, Dec. 2, 3 p.m., Room lA. The committees and commission will
consider: How Much Regional Open Space is Enough; proposed Metropolitan Council bond fmancing for .
,1998-99 Regional Parles.Capital ImprQvetnent Program; and other.business.
Finance Committee - Monday, Dec. 2, 4 p.m., Room 2A. The committee will consider: authorization to
close meetings of the Finance Committee to discuss labor negotiation issues; authorization to award a
contract furnishing unifOIIDS and laundry services for MCES and MCTO and lockers for MCTO; approval
of the 1996 Metropolitan Agencies Personnel, Ethical Practices and Communications Activities Report for
transmittal to Minnesota Legislature; and approval of amendment to the personnel code and non-
represented plan. The next portion of the meeting may be closed to the public for discussion of labor
negotiation issues. The meeting will be reopened to the public following labor negotiations discussion.
The committee will consider authorization to approve the agreement between the Metropolitan Council and
AFSCME;Council14, Local 688 and receive information on Moody's and Standard & Poor's credit
reports and 3rd quarter budget report.
Truth in Taxation Public Hearing for Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District - Monday, Dec. 2, 6 p.m., Chambers. The Metropolitan Council will make a ten minute
presentation followed by a questions and answer period. Following completion of comment period t9 the
Council, the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District will make a ten minute presentation followed by a
question and answer period. r
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee to the Transportation Advisory Board- Wednesday,
Dec. 4, 9 a.m., Chambers. The committee will consider: MN/DOT statewide plan; Minnesota
Transportation Loan Fund Program; Minneapolis transit plan and funding strategy; Nominating Committee
recommendation for 1997 TAC chair; new date for January meeting; and other business.
~.' "~'._,-~ ~......,.._.~~.........,",,~..:':;.
(
.;
Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee - Wednesday, Dec. 4, 1 p.m., Room 1A. The
committee ~ consider: farecard. TRIM unit visual modifications; 1997 legislative partnership with MPTA;
Metro Mobility demand service RFP status; Metro Mobility vehicle procurement status; Metro Mobility
Operations Report; and other business.
_e
Metropolitan Council - Thursday, Dec. 5, 4 p.m., Chambers. The Council will consider: revisions to
MCfO Business Plan; transit provider assistance agreements for calendar year 1997; Minnesota Valley
Transit Authority 1996 budget amendment; procurement of small buses for Metro Mobility and Transit
Redesign; authorization to award a contract furnishing uniforms and laundry services for MCES and MCfO
and lockers for MCfO; authorization to approve the agreement between the Metropolitan Council and
AFSCME, Council 14, Local 668; approval to extend 1996 emergency contractor list; second reading and
approval of amendment to Metropolitan Council bylaws; approval of Appointments Committee membership
for MPOSC appointments, setting public meeting dates for MPOSC applicants, and setting Appointments
Committee meeting date for developing final report to the Council; and other business.
Public Hearing: 1997 Work Program and Budget - Thursday, Dec. 5, 6 p.m., Chambers.
Public Hearing: 1997-2001 Capital Improvement Program and 1997 Capital Budget - Thursday, Dec.
5, 6:30 p.m., Chambers.
Metropolitan Radio Board - Friday, Dec. 6, 9 a.m., Metropolitan Counties Government Center, 2099
University Ave. St. Paul. The board will consider: amendment to the 1996 budget; insurance renewal;
construction manager job description; recommendation ofRFPlspecification to MNIDOT; and other
business.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre;230 E. Fifth St., St Paul. Meeting times and
agenda are subject to change. For more information or confirmation of meetings, ca11291-6447, (lDD 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 for news of Council actions and coming meetings. -
. .
TENTATIVE MEE~GS 1HE WEEK OF DECEMBER 91lIROUGH DECEMBER 13, 1996
Transportation Committee- Monday, Dec. 9,4 p.m., Chambers.
Environment Committee- Tuesday, Dec. 10,4 p.m., Chambers.
Core Cities Issues Work Group - Wednesday, Dec. 11, 12 (noon), Smiling Moose, Calhoun Square, 2nd
Level. 3001 Hennepin Ave. S., Minneapolis.
Executive ~ommittee - Thursday, Dec. 12, 8 a.m., Nicollet Island Inn, 94 Merriam St, Minneapolis.
Providers Advisory Committee - Thursday, Dec. 12, 10:30 a.m., Room 1A.
Land Transportation Committee - Thursday, Dec. 12, 1 :30 p.m., Room 2A.
Committee of the Whole - Thursday, Dec. 12, 4 p.m., Room 1A.
METROPOLITANSPORTSFACaITmSCO~S&ON
Special Commission Meeting - Tuesday, Dec. 3, 3 p.m., HHH Metrodome, Halsey Hall Room, 900 South
Fifth St., Minneapolis, MN. The commission will consider: contract for 1997 concession stand renovation
project; Minnesota Twins status report; and other business.
e
2
I . ..,~~ -..y', .....v'
~
t-
e
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St, Minneapolis, MN
55415. All meetings are held in the Commission office conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting
times and agendas occasionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Nancy -
Matowitz, 335-3310.
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION
Planning and Environment Committee - Tuesday, Dec. 3, 1 p.m., Room 301, West Mezzanine,
Lindbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: December ADNE levels;
fmal contract payments for: GTC earthwork, concrete, mechanical, electrical and interior improvements,
Lindbergh Terminal interior rehabilitation for 1995, primary electrical distribution system Phase ill, chiller
installation at Energy Management Center, Lindbergh Terminal roof rehabilitation, Southwest Terminal
public areas, international arrival facility parts storage and cargo transfer, upper level roadway ,concrete,
structural steel, and miscellaneous metals, 1996 airside bituminous construction at MSP, Anoka ColBIaine
Airport equipment building addition Phase n, and 1993-96 Part 150 Sound Insulation Program; contract
change orders for GTC/upper level roadway expansion general construction, fuel storage farm tank no. 4,
and building area expansion at St. Paul Downtown Airport; contract bids received for Southwest Mezzanine
development and wings hangar demolition at St. Paul Downtown Airport; review of upcoming construction
project bids; electronic audio/videeo equipment for new commission meeting room; potential administrative
settlements for New Ford TownlRich Acres acquisition; Part 150 residential Sound Insulation Program
recommendations; Nokomis Knoll historic district programmatic agreement; 1997-2003 Capital
Improvement Program.; MAC tenant environmental compliance program; City of Richfield litigation; and
other business.
Audit and Compliance Committee- Wednesday, Dec. 4,12 (noon), Room 301, West Mezzanine,
Terminal Building, Wold-Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: 1996 audit plan and internal
and concessionaire audits-1997 tentative audit schedule for first quarter.
Management and Operations Committee - Wednesday, Dec. 4,1 p.m.;Room 301, West Mezzanine,
Lindbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: October budget variance;
HoneywelllLandis GYR contract negotiations for HV AC maintenance services; renewal ofYquor licenses;
update of annual commerci~ vehicl, trip fee,-Ordinance No. 79; emergency request for elevator
replacement; Host Marriott lease amendment; NW A budget issues; Capital Improvement Program. funding;
legislative agenda task force issues; bond counsel legal services interviews; update regarding status ofRFP
process on cleaning contract; commission request for lottery information; commission request for airline use
agreement information; new commission meeting room facility; and other business.
Legislative Task Force - Wednesday, Dec. 4, immediately following the Management and Operations
Committee meeting, Room 301, West Mezzanine, Lindbergh Tenninal, Wold-Chamberlain Field. Thetask
force will discuss possible legislative issues. -
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th A v. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For
more information, call Lynn Sorensen at 726-8186.
e
3
.~tf.<;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4:30
4:30
5:15
5:25
5:35
5:55
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Dennie C. Hegberg
Oletrlct 1
***NOTICE CHANGE IN LOCATION AND TIME***
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
CITY OF LANDFALL
#1 4TH AVENUE
DECEMBER 3, 1996,4:30 P.M.
Mery Heueer
Oietrlct 2
Wally Abrahameon
Oletrlct 3
Myra Peterson
Oletrlct 4
Dave Engetrom
Oletrlct 5/Chalr
Roll Call
Consent Calendar
Public Hearing - H.E.L.M. Department - M. McGlothlin, Director
Temporary Moratorium on Antennas and Towers in Washington County
Public Works Department - D. Wisniewski, Director
Oakdale Library Construction Bid
General Administration - ]. Schug, County Administrator
1997 - 2001 Capital Improvement Plan
Discussion from the Audience
VlSi10rs may share rhdr concerns wim rhe Counly Board oj Commissioners on any irem no1 on me agenda. The Chair will direc1 me
Counly Adminis1ra1or 10 prepare responses 10 your concerns. You are encouraged n0110 be reperirious of previous speakers and 10
Umi1 your address 10 jive minuleS.
Commissioner Reports - Comments- Questions
This period of rime shall be used by me Commissioners 10 repon 10 me full Board on comminee acriviries, make comments on maners
ofill1erest and irlformarion, or raise quesrions 10 me s1off. This acrion is no1 imended 10 resull in subs1anrive board acrion during
this rime. Any acrion necessary because of discussion will be scheduledfor ajil1ure board meering.
Board Correspondence
Adjourn
...................................................................
Date
Dec. 2
. 1-3
MEETING NOTICES
Committee
Time
Location
Association of Minnesota Counties
Annual Conference
Library Board
All Day
Duluth, Minnesota (DECC)
6:30 p.m.
Woodbury Library
Atuisrive listwling devices ere eveilllble for UM in rile C....../y BOIl'" Room.
If you need .tuistance due ro disabi/i/y or IIInguege bIIm.r, pin.. ClIO 430-6000 (TDD 439.3220/
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
DECEMBER 3,1996
e
The folIowing items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
ITEM
Administration
A. Approval of the November 19, 1996 Board Meeting minutes.
Auditor-Treasurer
B. Approval of abatement applications for homestead classification, valuation and
disaster credit.
Community Services
C. Approval of Social Service fee schedule for calendar year 1997.
Public Works
D. Approval of cooperative agreement with the City of Lake Elmo for the
construction and maintenance of street lighting at the intersection of CSAH 17
and Stillwater Boulevard.
E. Approval of Supplemental Agreement No.5 in the amount of $26,000 with
TKDA for engineering design services on the County.State Aid Highway 2
improvement west of 1-35.
F. Approval of resolution awarding the bid for replacement of the Cooling Tower
and Chilling for the 1968 addition of the Government Center west wing to the
lowest responsible bidder, NewMech Companies, Inc. in the amount of
$154,600 conditioned upon the execution of a contract as approved by law.
G. Approval of resolution awarding the bids for reconstruction of CSAH 16 in
Woodbury, to the lowest responsible bidder, Danner, Inc., in the amount of
$3,388,528.76 as conditioned upon the execution of a contract as approved by
law.
H. Approval to advertise for Phase II-V of the sprinkler system construction for
fire protection at the Historic Courthouse.
*Consent Calendar items are generally defmed as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved
in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
e
An update from the AssocIatIOn of Metropolitan MUnicIpalitIes
,.,c j:t':'jf"f' ...
,.;,i'.";..,.",,.,:"'u ,,,,,,i:,; ";.\/'" :'l ... . ".'.'
· AMM resp()rias4@pro~r@se",~~f{,c"
, ~t6Wthtndrlag". et#~i'?enf~tt~t@'~<j
,~; ".. . ..:'/'" L_,'.;:;"" . '. ,(~t':. i...""".",:,\: :'.: r,'. .,,:';, ::'::i;,.,..;,,~l.;,
~::~L
By;'Vern Peterson
... 1 .,~;f~~ L~ff~il";:F~,,?S.:;!$V!;>~!'> .
.,...,...,' ..T.;~'heAMM's . Metropolitan
,-,,1::1 }}-'ijAgemcies'Committee ',!
~~^ '.-' "'Jl.7/.> ::44:"'0'.' _'_. :-",., ",;,,,,,-,,-,, ""J,,__ .,. -,,_' "H-,~
th~s'jUst :cofnpl~ted.ah~:;:'~ ,ud
T...,..'.~;'spohse: to'the'Metropolitan
.t :,.".:' . ",,'..,.,.'.'
1i9?ui1cil's"pr~posed.growth.
.Yrnanageme'ht'strategies.
J "~<The AMM Board of Direc-
,"",...,:.;'.,'" ',. ..' .." ... .,
...':~t~r~ will..r~yi.e.'^'th~.committee
, document ,at a special meet-
~"'.'1-" (-~;", ' "" ';;,,-- "'t,,, " ,
, . J ing on Dec. 5.-:' f;:rr''!i
" 'iilf.,;' ' ;li:;"l;"j.l<\ <i'" (;~, ., ,'11'~' ,;
, ,', 'The response represents a
~, . ,. '-.. .," l.,~- ',','" '. ',.-" "'-, _, , "
f~fl.~~~iD~~"t~~P!i~~,Q,J),~~~~~lY,irg .
~h~.~P'!!!YRIRPm.')1i'tQi'1,';~~Jo .
planforlocal needs and,.. ,
'_ 1,;" ;, >~.'" ., ~-"j .." t.-if 4" ..'..:: * \.. .. ~ ," "". ." 'J- - \ ^.~- '-.J ~ j ~ \ " '. .'
c:ispirat!<ms,withiD. the.. context
of s' reg'io'natplai,ning'fr~lme~
i."" I _" - " _'" _,0 _, ," _ ~. '. _ ~", , ".....~ ',-..- ..
work needed to maintain a.,
"".,.t"", 'it ,}, ""f~-"'~ _tl-",,~.:, ,C-., '...' ,,: '~"'"'<:<-~ ~, ~," y.~,_..-:" '!., ".~ ,,-.' ~
high quality of life in the ..'.
~.....,.,:i7~ ~","...;l....~-.",.-"", . ::''':'-: .
'ltregion'asa whole.~.i ".." .~.~
",;.f<.,.. .~_.~:..,J""",._"",{'j_ _~",,1;-_~~.!._ ~"::;,J:<_!:/:-">"'<' .l;J\'" 'r, ~',.
:Th~ ,c()mri1i~ee effof'! \Vas
somewhafha.mpered by the
'" >. _ . ~__~:_ .' _ ,_ ",.',' _ ,,, ,"' ',' ..^" _'''''' i
.Iack of specificity. in the
Council's proposal reg'arding
tools and implementation
devices. Much of the
Council's strategy is based on .
using transportation/transit as
Ie
.a "shaper".,Rf'i}~X~ppm~htl~ \: area. Growth cannot be
an~ redev~~2piii~]I~hJ,9h~iIIc'mcmaged effeyti"elywithin :1
require additional finand.al.., 'the seven-county area unless
,resources. vr . ....i:~!~l. ... ... .~dhere~are' sorne.constraims.1
Whether the~e's,'~n6ugh\)~;~;,I~o'ngrO~h.iQ. th'eex':LJrb~m,.'Y}
:~'political wiln;aQhe;region~;;~/,/J1area7,J~:'.. >, ...., '.'> ,t
,,~ndstate leVEilsto' prpvide'cY-l,:.i. The'd~finition .of t~e'u.rQan .
,these 'essential resources.. . coresh6'uldbe e)(pande~to
.d remains~to beseen~':r~t;~l4~~~t. ;,1; include the older inn,er-:ring
.' Some key fe,a,tur~spf~h~.~,;:",:'su~~rb~~h),Ch.' ha,ve'maflY
coinrl1itteere~p()J:lse. are:,/:' .' . problemsand'c()ncerns'~~'
~I": ' ^ ,.,' "'.',' -, ~~,- _ ..-~ - ,""', ,- _' <",~;:.." ./_ _ ...._',~,..\",..-),-,,:~ .:J!:.;o ,
f~!,,~UpPPrttheur9~n res~rY~;*f<' similart6 JhE;!cen!~al ,c,ities. ,I
!.'ang ...prpa,h ig~~P~.~,...~~~r~d~rY..~..;it::(Prib[fC>1JiejJ~~>gioJi'~t.~.Ilt~~~.
concept as'c>netdol in' con- ~ >prhit. this 'area was Clefine'd!i., .
tainYng'Urb'~n:~Pf~~(', . :," a~'i~~i=~i'I"f^Dev~r6hedAfe~.
, . . "'l!"'<"" .. ~\.,:" ,-..:'..-<'\c::,.;""':l..... Y'~'.;"lS~".)),"'':;\!'''$i''Jt'''';''')
. ~uPPo.rtes~abhshlng. .,.,. Revitalization of the urban
<'.':,- _' "'-_':;:::,l;r;!.~~.\j,',"'~~'" ~:,-~!,-,;, ,-,-.-', 1--.1,; -~-. "".,_" ,.".,,(-,11'-',:f",~'-":_',1_t ';.~:'t~'.."~>~>;""tv~i'~'::;',;,:~,,,.~,
20?9,ur~~,ng~~V1~< p,qYnd~1)' . core, (whiph.sho'uld incIJ.u;te",
thro~gh'Jr,~!~o.~pte~~h~~i~A' ~he. !nner~Hng~ suh~'rbg~s(~;;;
planproce's~',';"~~i~!,>~;:~;:.,'~t~':~i, ....Hot~a ab'ove Is'criti'6a1 to the
..r: o'nce' th~is\iJ)oYinaarYfis:~i:;~""::\"':cofiHncred \J~~litY~Wa~~tJ~IWi1
. C_',:,". .. "f'__ ,:i':-',-"'~'!''f.z" >; -:H ; <~.~:,:~,,,:' -~~,J, _ ,_:__.: _ . - ~~tr.',''-~--.. q ". ,Y
e~tablishea.lo,cal ul1its :of'r~'/~(' of life of the entire 'rnetro "':>
'goverrirn~enr;h~ldbe)l~.fa~~!':"' ar~IG. .::~q:,i:d~~t) u'~OiJ;.l1 i
accountabielfotnof:aiiowln~r' ... .~i"-)~' ;T;f5'tr:"'f~:';:',:.:;',r's:'~
"uiban~er;'sitY",~evelopm~nt ;';' t:.r;,~,;'.'
beyond 'this line:' . ",' """'",,, '.. M~r.e funding and tools
. Concern'~bou'tthelack:()f should be provided for clean-
real tools to manage growth up of contaminated soils
'beyond the legislatively .
defined seven-county metro
Growth · page 3
November 1996 Vol. 1111, No.4
_,--_,"~-"'"' -,.-,--'- ---".\1"""~-~'
Rumors fly about property tax reform e
Weare past the elec-
tions and nearing
the next legislative session
. and rumors aboundl
Property tax reform looms
as a major topic for the 1997
Session. However, reform
still means many different
things to different people and
accomplishing meaningful,
or any reform forthat matter,
is still a long. shot. The easy
answer may be the Freeze
for some.
Senate leadership has not
changed. Rumors are that
the freeze is once again on
the table for consideration.
At this point there does not
seem to be much senate
activity on a property tax re-
form package, which probably
means that we will start with the
Hottinger and
Novak bills from
the last session.
The upshot
is that if con-
sensus on
property
tax re-
form is
u n
achiev-
able, the freeze will probably
be considered.
Some might consider a freeze
as an easy alternative to sig-
nificant reform and end the im-
petus for the search for overall
property .tax reform.
Although the House with-
stood the pressure to con-
sider a freeze last year, it is
unclear what it may do this
year.
The AMM staff and Board
of Directors will certainly do
everything we can within
the confines of overall AMM
policy to find successful
resolution.
However, as city officials
in the midst of next year's
budgeting process, it might
be prudent to keep in mind
the possible scenarios and
uncertainties for the future
and protect reserves for
emergencies. [!]
Legislative Contacts: The AMM needs youl
Building a rapport with
legislators is essential
to a successful lobbying
effort, so once again, the
AMM is gearing up its legisla-
tive contact system for the
1997 Session.
The board developed the
legislative contact system for
two primary reasons: To keep
AMM members involved in
the legislative process and to
improve the overall AMM
lobbying effort.
The responsibilities of a
legislative contact are not
time consuming, but their
work is invaluable.
At least one elected official
or staff member from each
member city is needed to
serve as legislative contacts
between the AMM, the mu-
nicipality and local legislators
regarding metro interests.
. The contacts interact with
the AMM and the city's sena-
tors and representatives
during the early stages of the
legislative session, and dur-
ing the later stages when bills
and legislation are finalized.
The contacts will receive a
broadcast fax from the AMM
contact coordinator, Cheryl
Budewitz. The contacts then
contact their senators and
representatives to express
the AMM perspective.
If you would like to continue
to serve as a legislative
contact please contact Cheryl
at 215-4003. We would also
encourage new persons to
volunteer -- the more voices
the better!
An instructional handbook is
available to help you. [!]
ei
Page 2 November 1996
. Public rights-ot-way issue will be hot topic
LMC ready to promote cities' right to manage during 1997 Session
By: Tim Busse, LMC
By now, management of
the public rights of way
should be a familiar issue for
city officials.
When the 1997 Legislative
Session roars to life in less
than eight weeks, the focus
will shift from informing city
officials about the importance
of the issue to convincing
legislators that cities should
manage the rights of way.
Rights of way isn't an issue
that can be explained in a
quick, one sentence sum-
mary. The issue is compli-
cated and nowhere near as
glamourous and interesting
as say, property tax reform.
But city officials across the
state have made it clear they
are concerned about the
future of telecommunications,
and have shown they are
willing to do what's necessary
to protect their taxpayers and
their streets.
''The remarkable amount
cities have paid into the
League Rights of Way Fund
and the number of cities
participating shows the un-
derstanding cities have on
this issue," said Jim Miller,
League Executive Director.
"Thanks to all the cities that
have made payments to the
Fund and have committed
themselves to maintaining
local management of this
important public asset."
The League has an infor-
mational video available for
loan, and members of the
League Board or staff are
willing to attend council meet-
ings to discuss the issue in
detail.
During the League's fall
Regional Meeting circuit,
Miller traveled almost 4,200
miles without leaving the
state, talking rights of way
with city officials, newspaper
editorial boards and others.
At each stop, he pointed out
the simple fact that cities
cannot outspend a telecom-
munications giant like US
West.
To be successful before the
legislature, cities will need
Rights-of-way · page 4
Growth/ Call 215-4000 for copies of the AMM response
From page 1
e
(brownfields) and more fund-
ing should be provided for
preservation of existing af-
fordable housing. This addi-
tional funding could be pro-
vided through the Livable
Communties Act programs.
. Acceptance of the
Council's goal of increasing
densities in the urban service
area as a means of preserv-
ing long-term agricultural and
rural lifestyles, reducing
urban sprawl and helping to
revitalize the urban core.
However, the tools chosen
by the Council to accomplish
increased densities must be
used judiciously so as not to
create deletorious conse-
quences.
. While recognizing that it is
very difficult to measure, new
development should pay its
own way or its true costs.
. The Counc; j should ana-
lyze the cos. of development
very carefuJy as part of its
growth management strategy
implementation and modify
regional pricing mechanisms
accordingly.
The committee plans to
continue working with the
Metropolitan Council in help-
ing to implement "policy that
will lead us toward mutual
goals."
Copies of the committee
report may be obtained from
the AMM office by calling
215-4000. [!]
November 1996
Page 3
Rights-of-way /Informational video available
From page 3
more than lobbying dollars.
"First, we have sound
arguments on our side. It's
hard to argue against local
management and protecting
public investment," said
Miller.
"It is gratifying to see the
number of newspaper editori-
als that agree with our posi-
tion that cities should manage
the rights of way, and taxpay-
ers should not subsidize
private industry.
"Second, we have the voice
of Minnesota cities on our
side. Legislators listen to city
officials," he added. ~
AMM Bulletin Board
.;
The Metropolitan Council is holding a FORUM FOR
NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS Thursday, Dec. 19 from
7:30-9 a.m. at the Metropolitan Counties Government
Center (2099 University Ave.). The purpose of the forum
is to introduce new officials to the Met Council, and
specifically those items of interest to local governments,
such as the reqional growth strategy. A continental break-
fast will be available.
"~
[~~r I
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
145 University Avenue West
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103-2044
News In Between is published
every four to six weeks during
the legislative session and as
needed during the interim to keep
officials abreast of issues that
may affect metro cities.
@ Copyright 1996 AMM
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103-2044
Telephone: (612) 215-4000
Fax: (612) 281-1299
e
The Board meets on the second
Thursday of the month at 7 p. m.
President:
Tom Egan
Vice President:
Jim Prosser
Past President:
Joan Campbell
Executive Director:
Vern Peterson
Legislative Director:
Roger Peterson
Communications Director:
Cheryl Budewitz
Administrative Assistant:
Laurie Jennings
[~---=.. --.
-~.._.._ _.. .: -.:_....; .,r
..
,(;/,,;<. "~'f'~~:~....'/J U.~.- 2 ~:~)i~':~.tl:
\ )~>.~:: ;l:! :-: fJ ~? ::!=
'... . . '~. . :-:_;.;.....- ~ . l.i h -- i:
,~ ": " \ ..,.. .-,' : ..
.
Nile Kriesel
Coord
216 N 4th St
Stillwater, MN 55082-4898
I'
"'.., Printed on Recycled Paper
II
, .. ,- ",
Page 4
LOWER
ST_ CROIX
National
Scenic Riverway
November 1996 · Newsletter 2
Planning Continues on the Future of the
Lower St Croix National Scenic Rivenvay
Since publication of the May newsletter, work has continued on laying the foundation for a new coopera-
tive management plan for the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway. Both the Lower St. Croix Plan-
ning Task Force (comprised of interested citizens, agency staff, and other riverway stakeholders) and the
interagency planning team (comprised of staff from the ~nnesota and Wisconsin Departments of Natu-
ral Resources, National Park Service, and the Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission) have
been analyzing the lower riverway's resources and uses, and discussing various issues and concerns re-
garding the future use and management of the lower riverway.
In September the task force and planning team held a 3-day workshop to better understand the lower St.
Croix's different landscapes and to begin identifying the range of visitor experiences and resource condi-
tions for which the riverway could be managed. This information, along with information from the first
planning workshop in April 1996 and from task force meetings held throughout the summer, will be
used to develop management alternatives early next year. .
This newsletter updates you on progress over the past five months in developing the Lower St. Croix Na-
tional Scenic Riverway Cooperative Management Plan. The newsletter includes a synopsis of the public's
comments on the May newsletter, a description of what the task force has been doing, a list of the issues
that the cooperative management plan will be addressing, and a summary of the September planning
workshop. A short description of the riverway's landscape units, which shows how the riverway's charac-
ter changes is provided. You will also find a restatement of the Lower St. Croix's purposes, significance
and exceptional resources/values, which are key to deciding how the riverway should be used and man-
aged. Finally, the newsletter notes what
will be happening in the planning
process through the winter.
~
-...---
,-......-
-=::._.::.,:,:;....:,'.~;,:.::"- .,-.,
-':;;;.:;::::.
.._..:_...~..."..-,._-
e
---
....".............-....".......
-_......;.;...,.....-
==--~":.:':._. ' "", ~..,..~_.
. _.. -...,.--_.~_.-..-.-
~_. --...-.---
---_.,~...::-:.-=~-~.:~_."._-, ----.;:;.;.--_.....:~-=_.
---..".
- -=- .-
Summary of the Response to the May 1996 Newsletter
at the first workshop. People were
generally concerned with protect-
ing the natural environment and
limiting future impacts.
Last May, the planning team is-
sued a newsletter summarizing re-
sults of the first planning
workshop, held in April 1996. At
that workshop participants devel-
oped statements describing the pur-
poses, significance, and exceptional
resources for the Lower St. Croix
National Scenic Riverway. The
May newsletter asked for comment
on those statements and solicited
information on people's "desired fu-
tures" for the riverway and issues
that the plan should address.
Most respondents had similar de-
sires for the future of the riverway.
Many wanted to see the riverway
remain as it is today, with the
river's water quality, islands, wild-
life, beaches, shoreline, and unde-
veloped natural areas being
protected and preserved. Many re-
spondents said they wanted new de-
velopment to be minimized and the
small-town flavor of the communi-
ties along the river maintained.
Some people wanted the Lower St.
Croix to be more natural than it is
now. There were widely differing
views on boating on the lower
river. Some individuals wanted less
motorized boat traffic arid/or more
restrictions on boating. Others
wanted fewer restrictions on boat-
About 430 newsletters were distrib-
uted, and 23 separate responses
were mailed back. In addition, the
task force received four letters
from individuals voicing opinions
about what should be addressed in
the plan. Most people who com-
mented supported or did not dis-
agree with the draft purpose,
significance, and exceptional re-
source/value statements developed
2
---!:f;:'":=..-_.-
...~
e
ing and more opportunities for ac-
cess.
Those who commented raised a va-
riety of issues they wanted to see
the cooperative management plan
address. Issues that were fre-
quently raised included: resource
impacts from recreational use and
from development adjacent to the
riverway, and noise from water-
craft. In addition, a number of peo-
ple were concerned about the
safety of boats traveling at high
speeds and urged boat speeds be
regulated; however, others did not
perceive speed to be a problem and
saw no need for additional regula-
tions. Some individuals were con-
cerned with the impacts of existing
rules and regulations on homeown-
ers. People voiced differences of
opinions about access to the river-
way: some said there should be less
access, while others said there
should be more.
;i
~~..:::::.:.;.~'.=:~==-..:: .-
e
Purposes, Significance, and Exceptional ResourcesN alues
of the Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway
e. .
After re-examining the draft pur-
pose, significance and exceptional
resource/value statements that
were developed last April, and af-
ter reviewing the public's com-
ments in the May newsletter, one
change was made in the state-
ments. It was observed that the
lower riverway's diverse fishery
had not been included in the initial
list of exceptional resource/value
statements. The task force and
planning team agreed that the fish-
ery should be highlighted and re-
vised the list of exceptional re-
sources/values accordingly.
All of the statements are reprinted
below, with the single change high-
lighted in italics.
'-:'- '-<
:: --:>>.-.,,'..',....,".'.,.-.. ,..:' ','-: ,',' ':.. '.
The four purposes of the ~wer St. Croix National Scenic Riverway are:
:.-,.>:'_.-..-:::',:,.,:- ..:,-,"",' ',.:
...,.... ...11
>..: .'...:.... ..::.-.....,.: -- "'," ", :"".<,:.:::.,:.",.,<:,.., ,',:',,'.-.. - .... .. ",-::.-..:,,' ',:,.....: :..,.... '"",.-, ......
,"' .'," .....__.:.....-..,_...'.:,..:'.-.. "...." ',' ..........,.-..-.. ',- .---.....:............ ..... :.:-:.::.....
.. The Lower St. Croix National. Scenic Riverway is significant for the following reasons:
, .. ....... ...., .. """_';"'.,,::: ':.:....::>:.::....:>.:_._: ,..,....'..-.::..:.::___...' " 'c,' ......::......>. '_'.",," --'_" ,.', "'-"..""':","" .,.,
,.-'-'......;.....:.....:,,-..'.-,.: .,.'.>.:"..-.-.,..',.,.,-,-':..:-...-.....:,...,...............':.:.'.,...-. .,...... '.- '..: ...,.' .,....,.,,".. . ".. ...:..:.,....,..-,.,.,.',_.,-.-'-_...:.....-',........
. .. The riverway is ~exceptional combination of high quality natural and historical resources, and scenic, aes-
thetic, and recreational values. .. . ... ..
. These resources and values exist in a distinctive river valley setting with a strong regional identity and charae-
b~r. .
".'::: .:-:.._..':_:_-_,',.::;:,:.:::>-::::_:_',:_>:_::i;,:::":'-,,' ','-', . .': ',' ..-'," "'_-:-,,:,;:::':,__:'
The Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway contains the following exceptional resources and values:
. '. ..:..,.....:.-.:::... ':'. ,".': -....-..,:.-...,.....
;. ':'-';",''-'':' .... .....:..,..."-.:.- .,:.",'...".'-:....,......,...:.--,-...,.--..::,..-:.:..:...: -.-:',::.;','.:. .,-,,'....-:-.....:-.--.:,::.:"::,.'.:-:,:.,::..'.:..,:.::,....,..,-'-""'.>
. :::-:: .--:",',-'.. :.'::.. ':.. '.',:' ;.:' . - :-,-.'. ' ... ..,.- . '.," . :.: '.' .; '.'. '- .,: >'. . ..'.:,:. ..',:''-' . ::-., :. .',,'.-,:. .':. ,:: -. .'.,.' '. ' ". -:'. '. .' . - .. .' . . '. .'''.: .,.:.:.: :.:.:.: '"",:: ". -'~-' -'.. '. . .-.; .: -, .. '
.The~alle~'Syafitacl.cult~r~ resources reflect its unique rOI~o\Tertl1ohsandsOfyearsasa river transPortation
~rridor. ....... ..p.... .......... ....>i . ....... ... .. .. .. , >/ . . . ...
. Tile values ~f the:MinIlesota and Wisconsin communities ~rovide a broad constituency for the management
andpres~rvationofthe Lower St. Croix Riverway... . .... .>. .... ... ... ...i.. .. > ...>..>i........ . ........... ........ ..... .
. 'rhe 52 miles of the unimpounded Lower St. Croix River is at. the junction of three majbr biomes - north-
woods,..hardwoocis,an4 prairie.. The river has high water quality from a myriad of sources in the watershed.
. '>Tile juxtaposition of landfonns and geologic features - includi~~ thebluffs, islands, the Dalles, and Lake St.
Croix...... areunique'i .........< . . ... . . ...i' .. ..... ... <i //>) .
. Towns along~he river corridor retain their hist9ric small toW1.1 character:
. The diversity of scenic, geologic, economic, cultural, recreational, and exceptional natural resources combine to
make the Lower St. Croix River an outstanding and accessible resource forthe Upper Midwest.
. The natural communities, both terrestrial and aquatic, are diverse and of high quality. The sloughs, backwa-
ters, braided streams, and other river features provide habitat for native plants and animals. Rare and
endangered plants and animals, including mussels, eagles, and others, thrive here. The river corridor is an im-
portant flyway for migrating birds and contains an exceptionally diverse fishery.
. The exceptional characteristics and diversity of the linear riverway provide for a wide variety of high quality
recreational experiences. People can easily find opportunities, ranging from peace and solitude to dynamic so-
cial interaction.
e
3
Activities of the Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force
The Lower St. Croix Planning
Task Force was very busy through-
out the summer and fall. The vol-
unteer task force - comprised of
representatives from agencies, or-
ganizations, landowners, and citi-
zens with an interest in the lower
riverway - met seven times be-
tween May and September to focus
on a variety of topics relevant to
the development of the Lower St.
Croix Cooperative Management
Plan. The meetings gave task force
members a better understanding of
the lower riverway and issues re-
garding its management, and gen-
erated ideas and information that
will be helpful in developing the
management plan.
On May 30, the planning task force
focused on long-range plans for
lower river crossings. Repre-
sentatives from Northern States
Power Company, Wisconsin Public
Service Commission, the Minne-
sota Environmental Quality Board,
the Minnesota and Wisconsin De-
partments of Transportation, and
the Twin Cities Metropolitan Coun-
cil were on hand to provide infor-
mation and answer questions on
future river crossings by utility
lines and roads. The task force con-
tinued discussing this topic on
June 10, as well as the lower nver-
way's land use and land cover. On
June 26 the task force looked at
the riverway's geology and vegeta-
4
tive communities, with"repre-
sentatives of the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Natural Resources (DNR)
and the Minnesota County Biologi-
cal Survey making presentations.
Water resources were the focus of
the task force's July 8 meeting.
Task force members heard views
on the river's water quality and
management of water resources
from staff of the National Park
Service, Minnesota Pollution Con-
trol Agency, Wisconsin DNR, Min-
nesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources, Twin Cities Metropoli-
tan Council, St. Croix County Land
Conservation Office, and St. Croix
River Association, among other or-
ganizations. Native mussels, zebra
mussels, and the river's fisheries
were discussed by biologists from
the Minnesota and Wisconsin
DNRs and the University of Minne-
sota at the task force's July 23rd
meeting.
The task force turned its attention
to recreation issues on August 20
and 21. A variety of topics were dis-
cussed including boating experi-
ences, public access, impacts of
recreational use, boating regula-
tions, water surface use standards,
and enforcement of boating regula-
tions. A panel of boaters, repre-
sentatives from the Minnesota and
Wisconsin DNRs, the National
Park Service, and the Minnesota-
e
Wisconsin Boundary Area Commis-
sion, among others, made presenta-
tions at these meetings.
At its September 10 meeting the
task force discussed the lower river-
way's cultural resources. Among
the experts who spoke at this meet-
ing were a noted local author/histo-
rian and representatives of the
National Park Service, Minnesota
Indian Affairs Council, the Mille
Lacs Band of Chippewa, Minnesota
Historical Society, and the Wiscon-
sin Preservation Office.
The task force met on October 29
to discuss the relationship between
tourism and the lower riverway
and to finalize the list of issues the
plan needs to address (see below).
The next task force meeting is
scheduled for December 4 to dis-
cuss local riverway zoning and land
use protection efforts along the
lower riverway. All task force meet-
ings are open to the public and you
are welcome to attend. If you are
interested in finding out more
about upcoming task force meet-
ings, call Kate Hanson, the lower
riverway planning coordinator, at
612/439-7122. Videotapes and writ-
ten notes on each meeting are also
available through her.
e
Issues and Concerns being Addressed
Jy the Cooperative Management Plan
Listed below are 25 issues and con-
cerns the cooperative management ..
plan will be addressing regarding
future management of the Lower
St. Croix. The planning team and
task force identified these issues
and concerns based on their knowl-
edge and insights and based on
comments provided by the public.
Some of these issues and concerns
will also be addressed in the Lower
St. Croix watershed stewardship
statement, in a historic resources
study currently underway, and in a
future interagency St. Croix Basin
water resources management plan.
(Issues and concerns that will be
considered by both the cooperative
management plan and the water-
shed stewardship statement are as-
terisked.)
NATURAL RESOURCES
. Recreational use is impacting re-
sources, including island and
shoreline erosion, loss ofvegeta-
tion and habitat, presence of
litter, and human waste; more
heavily used areas exhibit
greater impacts. .
. Changing land uses, increasing
development, and poor land use
management practices, both
within the riverway boundary
and in the larger watershed are
. '
unpacting water quality,
aquatic communities, threat-
. en~ and endangered species,
and other resources. Pollutants
from both point and non point
sources in the riverway and the
watershed are affecting water
quality. *
. "Native vegetation and remnant
relatively undisturbed, biotic '
communities are being lost and
fragmented, resulting in a de-
crease in the riverway's
biodiversity. *
e
. Differences in water quality
standards and policies between
Minnesota and Wisconsin lead
to inconsistent protection of the
Lower St. Croix River's water
quality. .
. The lower riverway's water
quality is being negatively im-
pacted by sources in the air, on
the land, and in the water. *
. Riverway resources are being
adversely affected by the inva-
sion of exotic species and by a
lack of knowledge regarding the
distribution and abundance of
these exotics. "
. Native mussel species, including
two federally endangered and
eighteen state listed species, are
threatened by water pollutants
sedimentation, exotic species, '
loss of habitat, and direct hu-
man impacts.
. There is a lack of baseline inven-
tory information about all
biological resources, including
current biological charac-
teristics and trends.
. Management of water levels has
the potential to impact riverway
resources.
. A lack of knowledge of the St.
Croix fishery limits under-
standing of potential impacts to
the fishery.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
. Protection of cultural resources
is hampered by a lack of re-
source information. Existing
surveys are dated and don't
have a broad enough scope.
. Clear direction is needed on
management of cultural re-
sources relative to other
resources, both within the river-
way boundary and in adjacent
areas. *
. Native American burial sites
are not known and frequently
are not protected from develop-
ment.*
RIVER CROSSINGS
. The demand for new river cross-
ings and the resulting
proliferation of structures will
intrude on the river.
BOATING AND
OTHER RECREATION
. Conflicts are occurring between
recreational users seeking differ-
ent types of experiences and
engaged in different activities.
The conflicts concern how the
riverway should be managed
with regard to: watercraft noise.
,
watercraft horsepower; water-
craft speed; watercraft type;
watercraft access from the Mis-
sissippi River; opportunities for
solitude versus social experi-
e~c:es; boat wakes; angling;
VISItor safety; commercial uses'
special events (including large-'
group events); and the
availability of boater facilities
(such as accesses, waysides,
beaches, campsites, private
docks, moorings, and sanitary
facilities).
. Conflicts exist between riparian
landowners and recreational us-
ers due to noise, trespass, litter,
and boat wakes.
. Opportunities may be lost to de-
velop recreational trails on both
sides of the river, and at river
crossings.
LAND USE
. Changing land use and develop-
ment within the riverway
boundary and in adjacent areas
are impacting natural re-
sources, scenic quality, cultural
character and recreational expe-
riences within the riverway.
Alternative methods ofland pro-
tection (easement acquisition,
stat.e-mandated. zoning, other
zomng alternatives, etc.) need
to be evaluated.*
5
. Riverway zoning standards and
regulations are not being uni-
formly applied and enforced.
RIVERWAY MANAGEMENT
. Commercial navigation and the
related operation and mainte-
nance of the nine-foot and
three-foot navigation channels
can impact, and can be im-
pacted by, resource
management strategies, recrea-
tional use characteristics,
aesthetics, recreational boater
safety and aquatic resources.
. There are inconsistencies in the
way in which the National Park
Service and Wisconsin and Min-
nesota Departments of Natural
Resources regulate boating, fish-
ing, hunting and trapping in the
riverway.
. There is a lack of adequate coor-
dination, communication and
cooperation, and a lack ofinte-
grated management and
planning, between riverway
management agencies, federal,
state and local governments,
state parks adjacent to the river-
way, law enforcement entities,
and utilities; there is also a lack
of adequate coordination and
communication between the
public and the riverway manage-
ment agencies.
. Resource impacts and user con-
flicts on the islands at Hudson
(and other islands created by
dredged material placement or
accretion) are not being ade-
quately addressed due to
ownership and jurisdictional am-
biguities, and law enforcement
access problems.
6
PUBLIC FACILITIES
. There is a need to identify ap-
propriate interpretive facilities
for the lower riverway.
. There is a need to examine the
existing lower rive~ay view-
points and overlooks to
determine the appropriate
number and locations of places
to view the river.
In addition to many of the above is-
sues and concerns, the Lower St.
Croix watershed stewardship state-
ment will Consider two other land
use concerns:
e
. River crossings are affecting ur-
banization in Wisconsin.
. The scenic value of roadways in
the valley is not being protected.
Fr~~c ..~~;~ ..Y24 through 26. th~i~ra~ncy planningt:~~m and..fne. Lo~ St.
C~r~PI~ni~]"ask Force rnetinHudse".'yVjsconsin. to lay the basis for
d~p!~g~~ElTatives on managell'Kmtand use ofthe I.o~rriverway. Both day
and . ~~ions were. held. \V~i~~ wer~ o~n to the.pl.II:llic.The Workshop's
pri iCi.. ..... es were to identify ~~ lowerriverway's I~ patterns and to
begiQ.~~~birlg the range ofyisit~rexperien<:es and resOurce. conditiOns that
coUld Occu erent stretches oftheriverway.
T~cc...".c ............ d tI'a~I~~~,..,;;ay'~existing~dscapes and ......
~~~egroup firstclefin~i~if!erent geographical areas or
"~~."I'!its"in t~e lower rivE!r-vaythat have distinct .characteristics. The
grol.Ipdiyi~~ lower riverwayil'l~thirt'7n distinct landscape units based on
the~ral~!"lCter of the.river (e.g".~ver~pth. width. current. gradient.
aq~~f~!~'~ical communities). ~ ~har-ac:tet' of the landsca~ surrounding the
river~~.g.,tElr;restrial biological communities. the viewshed). and the character of
theElxi~ting bt;ii'tenvironment (e.g., river crossings. towns and other
d~l~ntS.,.presence of cultural resources). These landscape units describe
kert~f~I"e$.~Ong the river and how the character of the riverway changes
~rl]"ayI~ FalIs/St. C~ix FalI~andPrescott; they af"El not intended to be a
cOl1'lP'El~e~~ption of the riverway erlvironment. This understanding of the
~~y's character will be usefulillfuture stages of planning, helping determine
how different parts of the riverway could be managed.
~ . .. '. .
..::':..:..,.,....:..:>.,............ .. .. -.'
:.,:,::.:'::,.,-:..'.:.."..'.:.:,.,'...:......,..,.
"..<:...:-'::.:.'::.:.":...::.,....:..':....
The?therf)~rnary task of the workshop was to develop potential
~~ITlElnt areas. The intent of management areas is to identify what visitor
uses/experiences. resource conditions. recreational developments, and level of
manag~llt\yould be appropriate in different stretches of the lower riverway.
con$ist~nt '\iVith the lower riverway's purposes and significance. In other words.
the~gement areas identify hoW different portions of the riverway could be
managed to achieve desired resource and social conditions. Different actions
woulcl.be tal<en by the states and Park Service in different management areas
with regard to the types and levels of uses, and related services and fadlities.
The interagency planning team and the task force tentatively identified six
potential management areas that may be appropriate for various stretches of the
lower-St. Croix. More work needs to be done to complete the descriptions of
these management areas. The planning team and task force will be working on
this task over the next several months. When work is further along they will be
distributed for you to review. Eventually the management areas will be used to e
help shape different management alternatives for the lower riverway.
Landscape Units of the
Lower St. Croix National Scenic Riverway
e
Unit A: The Dalles of the St.
Croix (St. Croix Falls Dam to
Rock Island; 3.5 miles)
The St. Croix changes markedly as
it flows through this highly scenic
area. Rapids extend from the dam
to beneath the Highway 8 bridge,
below which lies a deep and narrow
gorge with basalt cliffs. In addition
to these scenic qualities, a signifi-
cant mussel bed lies near the dam.
Downstream of the gorge the valley
widens and the St. Croix changes
to a shallow, slow-moving river.
Tall, forested bluffs line the heav-
ily wooded valley. At Rock Island
the river narrows and passes
through another basalt rock gorge.
Signs of people and development
are apparent on the upper end of
the unit, with the communities of
Taylors Falls and St. Croix Falls,
Minnesota and Wisconsin Inter-
state State Parks (which include
trails, boat accesses, campgrounds,
a canoe rental operation, and a
commercial paddle boat/ excursion
service), the dam, and bridge.
Downstream of the gorge there are
fewer signs of people, with only a
small amount of residential devel-
opment visible on the bluff tops.
However, just above Rock Island
an underground pipeline crossing
has left a clear-cut swath up the
bluffs.
Unit B: Osceola Area (Rock
Island to McLeod Slough;
10.0 miles)
Ort this relatively undisturbed
stretch the river winds back and
forth across the floodplain, leaving
islands and braided channels be-
neath steep, heavily wooded bluffs.
_The water depth here is usually too
shallow for most motorboats. The
river sweeps beneath a towering
cliff on the west bank at Cedar
Bend, which marks an ancient bor-
der between native peoples. Just
below the Swing Bridge - a his-
toric railroad crossing - the river
splits into two distinct channels
that come together again at the
south end of McLeod's Slough.
This slough is marked by flood-
plain forests and extensive backwa-
ter marshes. Except for the small
bluff top community of Osceola,
only a small amount of residential
development is visible on the
wooded bluff tops. A Canoe landing
and picnic area are next to the
river by the highway bridge at
Osceola.
Landscape Unit C: Marine
Area (McLeod Slough to
Arcola Sandbar via Page's
Slough; 8.5 miles)
The Marine landscape unit physi-
cally is very similar to the Osceola
unit, but is marked by more resi-
dential development, especially on
terraces along the Minnesota
shore. This stretch also has a re-
nowned smallmouth bass fishery.
The St. Croix here flows through a
broad floodplain covered with for-
ests and braided channels, bor-
dered by heavily wooded bluffs.
Below Marine the main channel is
flanked by wooded islands. The
river has a relatively slow current
and shallow conditions that favor
canoes but can accommodate small
motorboats. Moderate development
exists along the Minnesota shore
north of William O'Brien State
Park. Many people are often evi-
dent at the state park, camping,
picnicking, and hiking. Down-
stream of the park lies the devel-
oped residential shoreline of
Marine on St. Croix. Page's Slough
is another area with residential de-
velopment on the Minnesota ter-
race.
Landscape Unit D: Rice Lake
Flats (Dead Man's Slough to
Arcola Sandbar via St. Croix
Islands Wildlife Management
Area; 2.5 miles)
This area lies east of Page's Slough
and is characterized by a large
backwater complex that is unique
on the S1. Croix. Most of the area is
part of Wisconsin's St. Croix Is-
lands Wildlife Management Area
The unit begins with the Dead
Man's Slough, which is a braided,
island-rich, backwater complex on
the Wisconsin side of the river's
main channel. Continuing down-
stream, the river flows slowly
through Rice Lake, a large backwa-
ter lake important for migrating
waterfowl. The Apple River enters
the 81. Croix downstream of Rice
Lake and forms a biologically rich
delta that includes the Arcola Sand-
bar - an extremely shallow sec-
tion of the main river channel that
serves as a barrier to motorboat
traffic from the south. Very little
development is visible in this reach
of the river.
Landscape Unit E: Arcola
Gorge (Arcola Sandbar to
Head of Lake St. Croix; 5
miles)
The river valley in this area is nar-
rower than in areas to the north or
south, and the valley walls are
steeper, frequently marked by lime-
stone and sandstone cliffs. Almost
the entire valley lies in the flood-
plain. The river itself flows
through a braided channel, with
numerous forested islands present.
The main river channel provides
7
adequate water depth (six feet or nesota bluffs recede far back from crossings. The fast current keeps
more) for large watercraft. Limited the river's edge. The forested Wis- the water ice-free most of the win-
development occurs on this stretch. consin bluffs are similar to the ter, making the area popular for
A few homes are visible atop the area across from Stillwater: the bald eagles. A significant mussel e
bluffs. The historic Arcola High bluffs descend almost to the bed is also found in the main chan-
Bridge, one mile south of the Ar- water's edge and the bluff tops are nel. A chain of sandy, sparsely vege-
cola Sandbar, spans the bluff tops dotted with homes. In contrast to tated islands runs along the
and dominates views for several the Wisconsin shoreline, the Minne- Wisconsin side of the main chan-
miles. Near the head of Lake St. sota shoreline is the most devel- nel. On the Minnesota shore the
Croix lies the Boomsite Highway oped reach of the St. Croix: a valley bluffs descend near the
Wayside, a popular roadside picnic commercial drydock, marina, large water's edge on the Minnesota
area and a historic log-sorting site. coal-fired electric generating plant shore, except near the Interstate
and large window factory are pre- 94 bridges. On. the Wisconsin side
sent on the terrace along the shore. the bluffs are set back from the
Landscape Unit F: Urban Views in this part of the river are water. This is another highly devel-
Stillwater (Head of Lake St. strongly impacted by the large oped stretch of the riverway, with
Croix to Stillwater power plant and its tall smoke- views dominated by Hudson and
Downtown Courtesy Docks; 2 stack, and also by transmission the two Interstate 94 bridges at the
miles) lines that cross the river. south end of the unit. On the Min-
nesota side the bluff tops have
The river valley here broadens con- fairly dense residential develop-
siderably and the river itself be- Landscape Unit H: ment, and several homes sit on the
comes lake-like. Islands at the very Bayport-North Hudson Area floodplain at the river's edge. On
head of the lake contain a heron (Andersen Point to Willow the Wisconsin side the residential
rookery within sight of a highly ur- River Dam; 2 miles) and downtown neighborhoods of
banized landscape. The Wisconsin Hudson, another of the valley's his-
bluffs descend almost to the This reach of river is again broad toric lumbering towns, cover the
water's edge, and are largely for- and lake-like. Tall bluffs rise from bluff tops and the river terrace. A
ested, while the Minnesota bluffs very near the water on the Wiscon- park abuts the riverfront down-
are largely set back from the river. sin side, but recede at North Hud- town, just north of the river's larg-
A large terrace on the Minnesota son. On the Minnesota shore the est marina.
side, as well as the bluffs above, wooded bluffs are set back from
contain the historic lumbering com- the river at Bayport and then come
munity of Stillwater - the St. back close to the river at the south Landscape Unit J: Open Lake
Croix watershed's largest city. end of the town. Fairly dense resi- (Interstate 94 to Catfish Bar;
Along the Minnesota shore are dential developments are present 4.5 miles)
Stillwater's downtown district, at North Hudson and Bayport,
some homes, marinas, and docks, while homes dot the wooded bluff This is the river's widest and deep-
while Lowell Park's seawall abuts tops on the Wisconsin shore north est section, nearly two miles across
the river. The Wisconsin bluff tops of North Hudson. A park and a ma- and up to 70 feet deep. The open
also are dotted with homes. The rina also line the shore in Bayport, lake unit is often windswept. Tall,
historic highway lift bridge across and railroad tracks run along the wooded bluffs descend to the shore-
the river is a dominant visual fea- shore south of town. .- line on the Wisconsin side. The
ture. Just upstream of the lift Minnesota bluffs are far from the
bridge is the head of a nine-foot Landscape Unit 1: Urban Bud- shore. A high terrace drops
commercial navigation channel. son (Willow River Dam to Inter- abruptly to the water's edge be-
state 94; 2 miles) tween Lakeland and Afton. Devel-
Landscape Unit G: South Still- opments are present in several
water-Bayport Area (Stillwater Although this stretch of the St. locations on this stretch. The Wis-
Downtown Courtesy Docks to Croix valley is broad, the main consin bluff tops are rimmed by
Andersen Point; 3 miles) river channel is narrow and fairly large-lot residential development.
fast-moving, confined to near the More intensive residential develop-
The river here remains broad and Minnesota shore by dikes built ment is found at St. Croix Cove, tit
lake-like. High bluffs are on either from the Wisconsin shore to accom- where most homes are on a terrace
side of the river, although the Min- modate a railroad and two highway below the rim of the bluff. The
8
LOWER
ST. CROIX
National
Scenic Riverway
e
LANDSCAPE UNITS
LOWER ST. CROIX NATIONAL SCENIC RIVERWAY
St. Paul
.
Minnesota Interstate
State Park
8
A
State Park
B
Marine on. ,
St Croix .
c
St Croix Islands
Wildl~e Area
D
E
Federai Zone
. .u...~.. ..... 'n~.." n..... ........ .............. ......
State Zone
F
G
H
I
94
J
K
L
M
e
+ NORTH
------ S1. Croix River
Lower S1. Croix NSR
- Major Highways
o
I
4.5
I
9 Miles
I
9
Minnesota river terrace in this sec-
tion contains five municipalities
and fairly dense residential devel-
opment. A flood control levee
fronts the river at Lake St. Croix
Beach.
Landscape Unit K: Catfish to
Kinnickinnic (Catfish Bar to
Kinnickinnic Narrows; 5.0
miles)
The river here is uniformly about a
half-mile wide and fronted by tall,
wooded bluffs that drop almost di-
rectly into the water. Directly
across the river from Mon is Cat-
fish Bar, a large sandbar that juts
into the river at the base of a large,
wooded bluff. Black Bass Bar, a
similar sandbar on the Wisconsin
side, lies south of Catfish Bar. De-
velopments and people are com-
mon in localized areas. Scattered
homes occur on the bluff tops. The
historic river town of Mon lies in
the floodplain, with two marinas, a
park, and scattered commercial
and residential development along
the edge of the river. Many people
are often present at Mon State
Park, which contains boat beach-
ing, hiking, and swimming areas. A
large electrical transmission line
also crosses the river on this
stretch.
Landscape Unit L:
Kinnickinnic Narrows
(Kinnickinnic Narrows; 0.5
miles)
A sandy, forested delta at the
mouth of the Kinnickinnic River
forces the St. Croix River's channel
against the Minnesota bluffs in
this unit. The narrow width of the
St. Croix here and its swift current
keep the water ice-free most of the
winter, which makes the area popu-
lar for wintering bald eagles. Wis-
consin's Kinnickinnic State Park is
an extremely popular boat beach-
ing and mooring area. Scattered
homes sit atop the Minnesota bluff,
which drops almost directly into
the river.
Landscape Unit M: Kinnickin-
nic to Prescott (Kinnickinnic
Narrows to Mississippi Conflu-
ence at Prescott; 6.0 miles) e
This landscape unit is very similar
to the Catfish-Kinnickinnic stretch
north of the narrows. The river is
uniformly about a half-mile wide
and fronted by tall, wooded bluffs
that drop almost directly into the
water. A peninsula extends from
the Minnesota shore at the mouth
of the river (Point Douglas), form-
ing a natural dam that creates
Lake St. Croix. Scattered homes
are present along the bluffs, but
most developments and sjgns of
people are present on the southern
end of this stretch. The confluence
area is dominated by the residen-
tial and downtown neighborhoods
of Prescott, another of the St.
Croix's historic river towns.
Nearby Point Douglas includes a
marina and a county park. A high-
way and railroad bridge cross the
St. Croix in its last few hundred
feet befoz:e meeting the Mississippi.
Where We Are in the Planning Process and What Ha~ens Next
As shown by shading in the
accompanying chart, we are
currently in the early stages of
developing alternatives for
managing and using the Lower St.
Croix National Scenic Riverway.
Work is continuing this fall to
refine the potential management
area descriptions that began to be
drafted in September. In December
the interagency planning team and
members of the Lower St. Croix
Planning Task Force will begin
developing alternatives for
management of the lower riverway.
On January 28 - 30, 1997, the
interagency planning team and the
10
task force will meet to discuss in
detail and refine the alternatives
for managing the lower riverway.
The interagency planning team
will then start analyzing the
implications of each of the
alternatives. Another newsletter
will subsequently be published,
seeking your views on the range of
alternatives being considered.
Sometime in late winter or early
spring of 1997 the planning team
and the task force will hold
another workshop to select a
preferred alternative for managing
the Lower St. Croix. Both of the
planning workshops mentioned
above will be open to the public.
Locations, dates, and times for the
workshops will be announced
through local news media
__ If you have any questions about
the planning process, would like
further information about
opportunities to participate in the
process, or have any concerns or
suggestions you would like either
the interagency planning team or
the task force to consider, please
contact Kate Hanson, the lower
riverway planning coordinator, at
117 Main Street, Stillwater, MN
55082; her phone number is 612-
439-7122.
e
, .
STEP
PLANNING ACTIVITY
5
Collect data and identify goals. In this step, we reaffirm the purposes of the lower riverway. gather and
analyze information, identify the riverway's signifiCant resources, determine issues and concerns. and propose
goals for the riverway's future - all based on information contained in existing plans as well as public input.
(Winter 1996 - Summer 1996)
Milepost: Purpose/Significance/Desired Futures Workshop
Develop and Evaluate Alternatives. A range of alternative ways to achieve goals and solve problems will be
developed. An environmental im~ct state/llent (EIS) will be prepared. which analyzes the environmental
consequenCes of each a1temativeandidenti~es a preferred alternative. (Fall 1996 - Spring 1997)
Milepost: Management C~nc7PtsWorkshop (September 1996 planning workshop)
Alternatives DevelopmentWorkshop
Preferred Alternative Workshop
Prepare and Publish a Draft PlantEIS. A draft plantEIS will be prepared and distributed for public comment.
The document will describe the alternatives, issues, and impacts. (Spring 1997 - Winter 1998)
Milepost: Draft Plan/EIS
Revise and Publish a Final Cooperative Management PlantEIS. A final plan/EIS will be prepared based on
the environmental analysis, public comments. and other information. The final plan may be one of the draft
alternatives, or it could be a "new" alternative created by combining elements from some or all or the
alternatives. (Winter 1998 - Summer 1998)
Milepost: Final Plan/EIS
Prepare and Publish Watershed Stewardship Statement. The planning task force will produce and
approve the document. (Fall 1998)
Milepost: Watershed Stewardship Statement
1
3
4
..
, ..,..... ..'_ '_ _0... __. ....... ........
v....,_............. '....,...._ __ " ....
What is the Lower St. Croix Watershed
Stewardship Statement?
,--- ..-.'.''..'' --- .:",__..<..... :..:.'.'. .''':':0:'..":',,.-':
_ _ _ __ _ -,' ,,' "':.:/::":::::.":' ",.,:u_,-.:'::.-:,,"":,-,':':::'::::_'_,,:':':_:-.,.'O::'"
Many of the Lower St. Croix National Scenic RiverWayi~uesand problems
strongly influenced by whllt~appens in the surrounding watershed. These
go beyond the scope of th~ cooperative management plan and the jurisdiction
the riverway managementagenCies.T 0 address the. broader watershed issues
facing th~ lower riverwaY~thl!Lower St. Croix Planning Taskforce will be
developing a waterShed stewardship statement. The task force has not yet
determined the content of the.wa.tershed steWardship statement. But the
document is expected to mc1ucle recommendations regarding activities in the
watershed that affect theintegtity of the riverway.
e
@ Printed on Recycled Paper - NPS 0-9
11
LOWER ST. CROIX INTERAGENCY PLANNING TEAM
Coordination Offlce
619 Second Street
Hudson WI 540 16
BULK RATE
US POSTAGE PAID
HUDSON WI
PERMIT NO 207
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE $300
Morli Weldon
Clerk
City of stillwater
216 N. 4th st.
stillwater MN 55082
e
e
-
Stillwater Public Library
223 North Fou rth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Board of Trustees
Minutes
November 4, 1996
Members: Doeksen, Gorski, Kalinoff, tockyear, Maybanks*, Myers, Nelson, Ruch,
Sandeen*. Director: Bertalmio.
*Absent
1 . Call to order:
A quorum being present, President Ruch called the meeting to order at
7:04 p.m.
2. Adoption of the Agenda:
Agreed to adopt the agenda. Moved by Kalinoff/seconded by Gorski.
3. Communications - The Board regretfully accepted the resignation of Mary Ann
Sandeen effective Dec. 31, 1996.
4. Consent Calendar:
Lockyear moved/Gorski seconded to adopt the consent calendar including payment of
bills in the amount $7,552.04. Unanimously approved.
5. Old Business:
A. The 1997 budget approval moved by Myers/seconded by Gorski. Still
working on final allocations especially in personnel services and supplies.
B. The Board vacancies are posted and applications are coming in.
C. School Staff visits by librarians were completed on November 4 for the
District 834 schools. We discussed visits to parochial and alternative
schools and these will be done by staff as well. The message may vary
because these schools do not have libraries; there will not be opportunities
for collaboration.
D. Board meeting day will remain Monday through 1996 and will return to
Tuesday in 1997. Moved by Kalinoff/seconded by Doeksen.
--
6. New Business:
A. We discussed Endowments and Foundations and determined that the
Alternative Funding Committee should investigate both. The consensus
of the Board is to use a portion of the Paulson Bequest in an endowment or
foundation, but not all of it. Further discussion at the next meeting.
B. Nelson moved, Myers seconded co-sponsorship of the Loft Writing Class to be
held at the library.
C. Gorski moved/Myers seconded motion to pursue a Centennial Fund Raising
Coordinator by creating a job description and identifying a budget. This is an
area to use a portion of the Paulson Bequest as well.
7. Adjournment: Agenda items being completed and there being no other
business, President Ruch adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m.
Cl
In
~ '
()
e 1m
L
/ l ; i r
I
. I
illllL
i,
,~
"L
y
:!,j
If
II
,j ;
i (
,
, 1
'I ii, t i
,'( !)'
t f
,I
I f
I '
11\1,'
,('I
1;
l'(); ! 1.
L, 11
I I
)('
,\ ';1
~ \)
'I
II, J
\11 1111" 'I
rjo
H,
" '
'!
ili j
1 ]
1"
~ 'j ,
~ 1
I ) y'
I Ii
ljl;
,)
/
97/"?c r
I
'"
t"
f'^J,
'"
:}-
f'l\
.
I"
ne
/
~,
~
'"
"
\ll
I'"
1 ,
,,,
j