HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-31 CC Packet
..
REVISED AGENDA **
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-14
May 21, 1996
. SPECIAL MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Workshop - Internet Task Force
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 30, 1996 Special Meeting; May 7, 1996 Regular and Recessed
Meetings.
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation for contributions to Human Rights Commission:
Travis Pepin, Tina Hanson, and Maya Hanson
2. Pat and Roger Hoyt, request for adjustment to watermain and SOC charges
3. Tim Stefan - Ravine erosion
. OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the
meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff
regarding investigation of the concerns expressed,
,.
CONSENT AGENDA *
1. Resolution 96-119: Directing Payment of Bills.
2. Contractors Licenses: Renewals - Performance Pool and Spa; Hi Tech Signs; Lee Hendrickson
Masonry; Ritzer Excavating; Universal Sign; New: Lund Martin Construction, Inc.; Roof Tech.
3. Purchase backpack blowers and chain saw - Parks Department
4. Temporary employment of Chris Diethert - Parks/public works Departments
5. Permanent employment of Craig Peterson as Patrol Sargeant
6. Consent to registration proceedings, Central Bank Title Registration
7. Approving employment of Shelly Schaubach as Senior Account Clerk.
8. Approving employment of Steve Wicker as Laborer/Maintenance Worker
9. Approve plans and specifications and authorize advertiscrment for bids, L.I. 320, 1996 Street'
Rehabilitation Project '-J
10. Accepting Proposal from Infratech Technologies, Inc., for televising sanitary sewer lines
11. Approving proposed salary schedule for Assistant Finance Director
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
2. Police Chief
3. Public Works Director
4. Community Dev. Director
5. Parks & Recreation
6. City Engineer
7. Consulting Engineer
8. City Clerk
9. Fire Chief
10. Building Official
11. City Attorney
12. City Coordinator
.'
1
City Council Agenda No. 96-14
May t1, 1996
.. \
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Possible second reading of Ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Stillwater.
(Tabled from May 7 meeting)
e
2. Acceptance of Environmental Assessment Worksheet and comments on Stillwater Flood and
Retaining Wall Project and determination of no significant environmental effect.
3. Case No. CUP/DP/96-18. Conditional use permit for reconstruction of Levee Wall, located in the
Flood Plain District, City of Stillwater, applicant.
4. Findings of Fact - Appeal SUN/96-15 (Gerrard project)
5. Update: Purchase of City-owned UBC site, downtown parking and purchase of Territorial Prison
site.
6. Lease extension agreements - Stillwater Yacht Club. (Tabled from May 7)
7. Possible first reading of ordinance amending fee schedule for mechanical inspections.
(Tabled from May 7)
8. Resolution: Accepting Work and Authorizing Final Payment to Tower Asphalt,
1.1 296-300, 1994 Street Improvements.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for revocation of driveway license agreement
.
2. Case No. SUP/96-37. Application for resubdivision of lot 4, Block 1, Prime Site subdivision,
located east of Washington Avenue across from UBC in the Business Park-Industrial, BP-I
District, City of Stillwater, applicant.
3. Case No. SUB/96-36, lot line adjustment for resubdivision of lots 25 and 26, Oak Glen Addition,
located at 1530 Amundson Lane in the RA Single Family Residential District. Daniel Spencer,
applicant.
..
4. Request to schedule public hearing to consider revocation of kennel license,
5. Petition for feasibility study - School District 834
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICA TIONS/REOUESTS
1. West Publishing Co. - Request for additional handicapped parking spot at 201 W. 2nd Street
2. Stillwater Memorial Day Assoc. - Request for city assistance for Memorial Day Program.
3. Mark Olien - Storm Sewer Utility Charge
4. Bob Safe, Taste of Stillwater - Request for city assistance
5. Michael Koop, Jeff Johnson - Residency requirement for HPC member
,
2
.
.
~
City Council Agenda 96-14
May 21, 1996
..
Communications (continued)
6. Washington County Board of Commissioners - Forum on metropolitan growth options
7. Board of Water Commissioners - Request for reappointment of Jack Jewell
8. Amanda Harrington - Request for reappointment to Human Rights Commission
9. Denise Carlson - Request for appointment to Human Rights Commission
10. Amy Hooley - Comments on Eagle Ridge Trail sidewalk project public hearing
11. SEH: Request for workshop* **
12. New City Commercial Properties, Inc. - Referendum for issuance of additional liquor licenses***
13. Knights of Columbus, Stillwater Council, No 1632 - Request for sign variance***
14. Friends of Long Lake Homeowners Assoc., Inc. - Request for Study Advisory ** *
15 . Washington County Sheriff s Office - Application process for permit to place temporary structure
or buoy upon a body of water.
* * * resubmitted from May 2 meeting
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate- discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which
event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
** Items in italics are additions to the agenda
3
\ -
I -e
Report to City Council
May, 1996
Internet Task Force
Lyno Sullivan~. Chair
Stillwater, Minnesota
II
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
I
e
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
3
SUMMARY
SYNOPSIS OF TASK FORCE DISCUSSIONS
SYNOPSIS OF COMMUNITY SURVEY
CONCLUSIONS OF THE TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A COURSE OF ACTION
STILLWATER CITY WEB SITE
AD HOC COMMUNITY NETWORK COMMITIEE
3
4
6
9
11
11
12
MISSION STATEMENT
13
VISION
MISSION STATEMENT
OBJECTIVES
1996 GOALS: LET'S CREATE A SCENE!
GLOSSARY
13
13
13
14
14
RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT
15
TECHNICAL RISKS
SOCIAL RISKS
15
15
BffiLIOGRAPHY
16
LIST OF CONTRIBUTING COMMUNITY MEMBERS
17
LIST OF TASK FORCE PARTICIPANTS
18
MEMBERS
NON-MEMBER VOLUNTEERS
18
18
-
May, 1996
Page 2 of 18
Ie
e
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
Report to City Council
Summary
In August of 1995, the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, convened the Internet Task Force for the purpose of
investigating how the City of Stillwater might establish a presence on the Internet. This report is the first
formal report of the Task Force to the Stillwater City Council.
This report contains:
o A synopsis of the discussions held by the Task Force
o A synopsis of the community survey conducted by the Task Force
o Interim Conclusions of the Task Force
o Recommendations for a Course of Action
Attached to this report are the following supporting documents, which will prove instructive to those
wishing a more complete understanding of this report:
o Mission Statement
o Risk Assessment Statement
o Bibliography of Research Materials
o List of Community Members Who Contributed Advice
o List of Task Force Participants
May, 1996
Page 3 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
SvnolJsis of Task Force Discussions
e
Beginning in September of 1995, the Task Force began meeting to discuss how the City might establish a
presence on the Internet. Many options and opinions were aired and investigated over the next few
months, concerning:
1) the purpose of the Task Force;
2) the intent of the City Council's mandate;
3) what role the City of Stillwater should play;
4) what services would provide real benefit to the community, both within and outside the
boundaries of the City of Stillwater.
On a more practical level, we discussed many specific issues including Governance! Administration,
Content, Equipment, Communications Technology, Geographic Scope, Training, Public Relations, and
Funding.
These subjects were discussed vigorously with little consensus developing until early 1996. The time
spent reaching consensus was considerably longer than any of the Task Force members had hoped.
However, in the last analysis, we feel the time was well-spent, because we can now recommend a
reasonable course of action.
Three general approaches to developing an "Internet Presence" were discussed:
1) Allowing the world to see "In";
2) Allowing our community to see "Out";
3) Enabling our community to work ''Together'', sharing information with ourselves.
Option #1, allowing the world to see "in" to the City of Stillwater, seemed to be a valuable goal, toward
which the City should begin work immediately. More is ~aid on this point in the section entitled
Recommendations for a Course of Action.
Option #2, providing our residents with the ability to use the Internet (to see "out" of our community),
was tossed out due to the ability of the private sector to provide those services. These services represent
a frantically competitive and fast changing marketplace, in which private Internet Service Providers are
willing to take enormous risk. The public sector need not take such risk.
Option #3, enabling our community to work together and share important information with each other,
seemed an important, perhaps the most important, goal of the community at large. More is said on this
point throughout this report.
The Task Force, during these discussions, felt a tension between option #1 and option #3, We are, on the
one hand, representatives of the City of Stillwater, but on the other hand, we found that the community at
large wants a broader effort undertaken.
The eventual resolutions to that tension are provided in this report in the sections entitled Interim
Conclusions of the Task Force, and Recommendations for a Course of Action.
(continued,..)
--
May, 1996
Page 4 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e
("Synopsis" continued..,)
The following is a synopsis of the subjects discussed by the Task Force. These represent the needs of the
community for electronic information which could reasonably be provided by the City using Internet
technologies readily available.
1) Electronic mail
o between residents;
o between residents and City Staff;
o between residents and City Council;
o between residents and providers of community services at the city and county level.
2) Access to City Information, such as:
o city council meeting minutes, city's comprehensive plan, development proposals;
o property legal data;
o census data;
o solid waste pickup schedule;
o work of various commissions;
o information regarding city-sponsored events such as Lumberjack Days.
3) A single point of access to the electronic information of:
o area businesses;
o religious organizations;
o non-profit groups and organizations;
o social service groups;
o municipalities.
e
4)
Access to School District information such as:
o school schedules, lunch menus;
o school extra-curricular activities;
o community education programs;
o on-line classrooms.
..;:
5)
Access to Social Service information such as:
o health care information database (possibly spearheaded by Lakeview Hospital, but
including a large number of social service agencies operating in the community);
o crises social services;
o county and various other routine social services;
o volunteer solicitation and coordination.
6)
Ac.cess to special interest forums, such as:
o discussion forums on various topics related to the community (artistic, political, social,
educational, environmental, historic preservation, hobbies, etc.);
o athletic activities for young people and adults,
(continued... )
May, 1996
Page 5 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
(" Synopsis" continued...)
The Task Force discussed the possibilities offered by a variety of newer technologies which would
provide such functions as electronic video conferencing and video mail throughout the city. These newer
technologies require a level of community commitment and public support which exceeds the scope of
this Task Force, so these technologies are not covered in this proposal.
It is, however, the hope of the Task Force that new, useful technologies be researched and used for the
benefit of the community whenever possible.
~;
May, 1996
Page 6 of 18
e
e
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e Synopsis of Community Survey
In January, 1996, the Task Force decided that additional community input was needed to give the Task
Force direction, Several volunteers from the Task Force conducted interviews in February and March of
1996 which were intended to allow individuals in the community to give us their view of how our
community could benefit from Internet technologies,
We attempted to select a cross section of the community for these interviews, with an eye toward finding
at least one representative in each of several areas in the community. We interviewed businesses and
non-profit groups, with the intent of gleaning ideas from the private and public sector.
Most of the interviews were conducted in person; a few were conducted over the telephone. A total of 25
interviews were conducted, including a series of interviews with representatives of City staff. The
following is a synopsis of these interviews. Please remember that these compilations do not necessarily
represent the conclusions of the Task Force, but they do represent real opinions from the community.
We have attempted to capture here in a personal way the perceptions and vision which the community
shared with us. We hope these compilations show the enthusiasm that is very evident in our community
for these efforts.
1) Excitement
Almost without exception, the people we interviewed were happy to talk with us and expressed
sincere interest in the project we are discussing. In almost all cases we received specific
examples of how these individuals would use an electronic network today if it were available,
Without exception these individuals have been seriously thinking about how the Internet could
be used to benefit their business or organization, and many of them know of others who have
made the plunge into the world of electronic COIlHDerce or electronic information sharing.
2) Interest in Bulletin Board as First Step
The most obvious first step to most interviewees was a community bulletin board, which would
easily gamer contributions of content by many community members. Would be great for
community newcomers, people searching for specific community services, individuals who are
politically active, and for history buffs.
3) Access to "Home"-Our Community
People want access to information about our community, with two-way communication between
people in the community. We found real enthusiasm for the profound impact the interactive
aspect of this project offers. Easy, non-threatening access to City staff and elected officials, as
well as information on public actions and events was widely attractive,
r
( continued. . , )
e
May, 1996
Page 7 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
(Community Survey, continued...)
e
1) Need for Coordination
It became clear through the interviews that many concurrent efforts are already underway, These
efforts show a vacuum of coordination and leadership at the community level. We need our best
creative thinking brought to bear on finding a way to provide leadership and coordination for
these efforts,
'S Z) Concerns
Many concerns were raised in our community discussions, most of them related to the
management of a community network and its content. The major concerns we heard are:
Q monitoring/supervision of content (keep it safe and unthreatening);
Q commitment to collection and maintenance of content;
Q equal access, provision of public access points;
Q training and assistance for new users;
Q need for a large constituency, possibly ISD 834, or Washington County, or the St. Croix
Valley, even including St. Croix County, Wisconsin;
Q proper management and support of computer equipment;
Q long term funding.
\0 ..a) Content Needed from the City of Stillwater
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
o
o
o
council meeting minutes;
agendas;
events;
solid waste pickup and recycling schedul,y;
list of parks and facilities, regulations;
fire and police departments: public education information;
community emergency services;
comprehensive plan;
historical information;
much more...
7...4) Community Firepower
Considerable corporate, municipal and private technological expertise exists in our community
which could be tapped to support an effort of this size, if real public good can be demonstrated.
If such good can be established, then community support will also arise, including that of a
financial nature.
eo
May, 1996
Page 8 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e Conclusions of the Task Force
1) 1996 represents a moment of unique opportunity for building a community network in our
community. Several initiatives are already underway:
o City of Stillwater;
o Stillwater Public Library;
o Washington County;
o Lakeview Hospital;
o Community Volunteer Services;
o Various Social Service Agencies;
o Local Businesses;
o Chambers of Commerce;
o Extension Service;
o ISD 834 Schools,
2) Public interest in a community network has reached a point where real contributions of content
will be forthcoming; educational and community services opportunities abound. The Task Force
strongly feels that decisive action should be taken.
3) The City should recognize that several efforts are already in early stages of exploration or
development, among them:
o the City of Stillwater Web Site (allowingthe world to see "in")-this effort is currently
underway under the able tutelage of Dennis Symalla and the Stillwater Area High School
Physics Club;
o the Internet Web sites under construction by the business community & chambers of
commerce;
o Broader community network (serving the approximate geographical area of ISD 834).
Each of these three tracks can proceed independently, but all would benefit from coordination of
efforts, and perhaps, sharing of costs and equipment.
It is important that these three tracks not be confused in the minds of decision makers or
community leaders. In particular, the role of the Stillwater City WWW Site should be carefully
considered so as not to overlap the other two tracks, and visa-versa.
4) Both the community network and the City WWWPage require a sustainable commitment to
funding and support.
Without this commitment the efforts will fizzle and lose community interest. Management and
administration are critical to the success of this project-a project built upon volunteer efforts
and good intentions will eventually fold. Practical uses must be evident to residents in order to
sustain their support.
Electronic activities must be moderated to guarantee a safe, unthreatening and legal environment.
Training must be provided for residents, and public access is essential.
e
(continued... )
May, 1996
Page 9 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
(Conclusions, continued.,.)
5) Small steps can be taken today which will benefit the city and its residents and will pave the way
for larger steps to be taken when better technologies become feasible.
6) The city should be open to working with business partners such as the city's cable and telephone
provider to bring affordable world-class communications technology to each home and business.
;;
May, 1996
Page 10 of 18
e
e
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e
Recommendations for a Course of Action
The Task Force recommends that the City of Stillwater participate in two distinct efforts which intend to
serve the electronic information needs of the community. These two efforts are:
e
1) construction of a Stillwater City Web Site;
2) participation in the Ad hoc Community Network Committee.
These two efforts are described in more detail below.
Stillwater City Web Site
The Task Force hereby recommends that:
1)
the City of Stillwater design, build, and commit to sustaining a City Web Site which will provide
access to information regarding those activities which are in the purview of the City, such as:
o work of City Council;
o work of all boards and commissions;
o work of City departments;
o public information available from Police and Fire departments;
o information desired by the Library staff to be disseminated;
o solid waste pickup and recycling schedules and policies;
o comprehensive plan;
o development proposals;
o universal email, if appropriate;
o etc.;
the Task Force propose to the City of Stillwater a process for developing web site content;
the City of Stillwater approve the use by the Task Force of the City Attorney in the drafting of
the process stated in #2;
the City of Stillwater establish an internship program for the summer of 1996, the purpose of
which will be to develop the City's content on the proposed Web Site;
when appropriate, the Task Force propose to the City of Stillwater a long term administrative
structure for the City Web Site.
"
2)
3)
4)
5)
( continued...)
May, 1996
Page 11 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e
(Recommendations, continued...)
Ad hoc Community Network Committee
The Task Force also recommends that the City of Stillwater:
1) allow the Task Force to share, with other community members and agencies, the results of the
community survey undertaken by the Task Force, and those findings of the Task Force which
relate to the community's desire for a larger community information system; and
2) participate in the broader community's efforts to build a community information system by
providing a representative of the City to attend meetings and coordinate efforts.
On recommendation #1: The Task Force desires to share the results of our community surveys and other
research with the larger community so that others may benefit from the research we have undertaken.
This would provide real assistance to various efforts to develop a larger community information system.
The Task Force has compiled a document to fulfill that purpose entitled "Open Proposal for a
Community Information System" and has attached it to this report.
The Task Force learned during our community survey that the support of many community members for
an electronic network was predicated upon the enlargement of the scope of that network to include a very
large constituency. At this time our best estimate of that constituency is the residents of ISD 834. This
feeling in the community is our basis for this recommendation.
On point #2: The Task Force feels that the City of Stillwater has a major role to play in the development
and deployment of a broader community information system, which will require that the City assign at
least one individual the responsibility of representing the City in these broader efforts and coordinating
the City's activities with those of the larger community,
..;
e
May, 1996
Page 12 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e
Mission Statement
Vision
That every citizen of the Stillwater community will have access to the education, information, and
communication resources available through electronic networks to help make the community a better
place to learn, live, grow and prosper,
Mission Statement
To provide every citizen of the Stillwater community with access to the education, information, and
communication resources available through electronic networks and to use the electronic networks to:
1) promote participation in civic life;
2) provide community members and organizations with the means to disseminate information;
3) encourage public discussion and education;
4) enhance the community socially, culturally, and economically.
Obiectives
1) To enable every citizen and group of the Stillwater community to obtain the full benefits of a
well organized and easy-to-use computer-based access to electronic networks.
2) To promote social interaction and civic participa~ion within the Stillwater community, and
between Stillwater and other communities.
3)
To provide education and support to the community in the access and use of computer based
community and world-wide information,
~.
4) To establish the Stillwater electronic network as a dynamic and self-sustaining community
resource.
5)
6) To provide the Stillwater community with access to electronic networks.
7) To encourage and help existing and new businesses to use these new electronic resources.
8) To collect and provide to the Stillwater community advice concerning the unique problems, risks
and citizens' concerns foreseen in the management of a community based network, including
concerns regarding censorship and the protection of young people.
e
9)
To establish the Stillwater community presence on the Internet.
May, 1996
Page 13 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
1996 Goals: Let's Create a SCENe!
e
1) To create an electronic network, which we as a community can use to collect and share
community information.
2) To give the Stillwater community organizations and businesses a presence on the Internet and
World Wide Web.
3) Join us as we explore the SCENe-ry!
Glossarv
Community
The term community refers to the City of Stillwater and the surrounding municipalities including but not
limited to those in the Stillwater township and in school district 834.
Name
SCENe: Stillwater Community Electronic Network
...
e
May, 1996
Page 14 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
e
Risk Assessment Report
This report is an attempt to outline the risks seen by the Task Force in building and operating a
community network. These risks apply to both the City Web Site and the larger community network.
This list was compiled without legal assistance from the City Attorney or other legal counsel.
TECHNICAL RISKS
1) Failure to make long-term commitment to technical and content support personnel; either by
partnership with private corporations or by public funding.
2) Failure to provide compelling service resulting in inadequate citizen participation and ultimate
irrelevance.
3) Failure to provide fire-wall security to protect against hackers.
4) Liability with regard to hardware and/or software recommendations made by the City or the Task
Force to citizens related to using the Internet or the Stillwater Community Network
SOCIAL RISKS
1) Failure to provide universal access.
2) Failure to protect against child harassment, solicitation, abduction.
3) Privacy/Security: from public sector and from individuals; need cooperation from law-
enforcement.
4) Failure to provide a filtering mechanism with which parents can filter content for children.
5) Failure to manage or "moderate" Community Network content with regard to stopping harassing,
obscene, illegal activities.
6) Potential for accusations of censorship over City's efforts to "moderate" Community Network.
7) Potential for abridgment of First Amendment rights of residents in City's efforts to "moderate"
Community Network. "
8) Potential for "technological elite" or "technological well-to-do" to exercise undue influence over
city affairs due to electronic access to decision makers. Some citizens could be sidelined.
9) Potential for movement of substantive discussions regarding city policy to an electronic forum
and away from traditional forums. Some citizens could be sidelined.
10) Potential for citizens with electronic access to cortununity network information to receive
information sooner than citizens without electronic access; Examples: Public notices regarding
availability of city services; V AA schedules; Adult education classes. Citizens with electronic
access to this kind of information may be able to get in line faster for these services than others,
possibly even excluding those without electronic access.
11) Potential of running afoul of public meeting laws when conducting discussions of public policy
in an electronic forum.
12) Potential for Internet services supported by the City to be seen as unfair support for certain
businesses over others.
[e
May, 1996
Page 15 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
Bibliography
e
Here is a brief list of research materials used by the Task Force. Many of these materials were written by
individuals deeply involved in the development of a community network, so the advice they provide has
great value.
Information of Community Networks
General Article by Doug Schuler
http://pubs.iworld.comliw-online/Dec95/public.html
How to Kill Community Networks
Doug Schuler
http://www.ilf.netleff/ ActivismlGroups_organizations/CPC/NPTN- Freenet
/dangers_t030mnets.article
Master's Thesis
Anne Beamish, MIT
http:// alberti.mit.edu/arch/ 4.207/ anneb/thesis/toe .html
Master's Thesis
Catherine Weldon
http://ben.boulder .eo.us/communieation/resources/thesis.html
Community Network Sites
Boulder, Colorado
http://ben.boulder.eo.us
Blacksburgh Electron Village, Blacksburgh, VA
http://www.bev.net
Charlotte's Web, Charlotte, NC
http://www.charweb.org
Taos, NM
http://laplaza.taos.nm.us
Winona, MN
http://www.lumintet.netlwinnetlindex.html
General Information Sites
Community Network international gateway
http://www.usask.ca/-scottp/free.html
Community Network Information repository at the U of Michigan.
http://www.sils.umich.edu/Community/Community .html
e
. I
May, 1996
Page 16 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
. .
e
List of Contributing Community Members
Here is a list, which we hope is complete, of the community members with whom we discussed the plans
for a City Web Site and a Community Network. These individuals provided invaluable insights and ideas
and we appreciate their contributions.
o Jerry Brown, Music Makers
o Tom Theuson, Cub Foods
o Jay Myers, Target Stores
o Vern Stefan, St. Croix Office Supply
o Judd Orff, Judd Orff & Associates
o Scott Zahren, Trumps
o Suki Thomsen, St. Croix Newcomers
o Kean Corkery, River Valley Athletic Club
o Chuck Dougherty, Lumber Baron's
o Lori Johnson, Tony Lillie, Patty Frentzos, Central bank
o Larry Waite, Lakeview Hospital
o Mike Tremblay, Andersen Corporation
o David Wettergren, Stillwater Area Public Schools
o Roger Karrick and Jack Kohout, Stillwater Post Office
o Mike Gripentrog, Ginny Erdahl, Jean Lugge, Jim Wells, John Devine, Internet Committee at
Washington County
o Lee Sather and Nancy Moore, Trinity Lutheran Church
o Chuck Leifeld, Minnesota Extension Service
o June Eagleton, Chloette Haley, Kim Finney, Community Volunteer Services/Stillwater Senior
Community Center .;
o Bob & Ruth Beck, St. Peters Church of Christ
"
e
May, 1996
Page 17 of 18
Report to City Council
Stillwater Internet Task Force
. .
List of Task Force Participants
e
Here is a list of Task Force members and other volunteers who have contributed their time to this effort.
Members
o Lyno Sullivan, Chair
o Jon Baller
o Jonathon Beck
o Lynne Bertalmio
o Jan Brewer
o Bill Byland
o Tim Dachtera
o Maureen Bell Farrell
o Judith Flader
o Dave Johnson
o Keith Kearney
o Jerry Larson
o Ted Malm
o Dick McMullen
o Wally Milbrandt
o Bill Rouner
o Dave Rueh
o Dennis Symalla
o Zbigniew Wieckowski
Non-member Volunteers
o Bob Baller
o Richard McClain
o Kelleen Roddy
o Rob Schultz
e
May, 1996
Page 18 of 18
e
e
..
'.
Open Proposal
for a
Community Information System
May, 1996
Stillwater Internet Task Force
Lyno Sullivan, Chair
Stillwater, Minnesota
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
.~
Table of Contents
OPEN PROPOSAL FOR A COMMUNITY INFORMATION SYSTEM .............................................................3
OVERViEW......................... ........ ......... ...................... ................................................................ ......... ...... ....... ... ........ 3
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. ..........................................................4
SYNOPSIS OF COMMUNITY SURVEy.... ... ................. .................... ................................................... ........ ........... ..... .....5
CONCLUSIONS OF THE TASK FORCE ........................................................................................................................... 7
TENTATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A COURSE OF ACTION .....................................................................................8
RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT .................................................................................... .................................. ...........9
TECHNICAL RISKS ................................................................................................................................................9
SOCIAL RISKS .............. ..... ............................................... ........................................................ ................ ...... ........ 9
BIB LI OG RAPHY ............................................................................................................ ...................... ....................1 0
Page 2 of 10
..
e
&.
-,
e
ie
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
'..
May, 1996
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
Overview
This report contains the findings of the Stillwater Internet Task Force with regard to interest in the
community for a community information system which would be used by and would benefit both
residents and organizations in the community.
Included in the report are:
1) a summary of the work of the Task Force; and
2) a synopsis of a community survey conducted by the Task Force; and
3) tentative recommendations for a course of action; and
4) a Risk Assessment statement; and
5) a brief bibliography of pertinent research materials use by the Task Force.
Page 3 of 10
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
.
Introduction
e
In August of 1995, the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, convened the Internet Task Force for the purpose of
investigating how the City of Stillwater might establish a presence on the Internet. The Task Force spent
the fall of 1995 and the Winter of 1996 discussing a wide range of subjects with regard to the
establishment of an Internet presence for the City of Stillwater. (For a more complete report on the work
of the Task Force, see the May, 1996 Report to Stillwater City Council.)
In January of 1996, the Task Force decided that more community input was needed to give the Task
Force direction. This decision resulting in the interviewing, by members of the Task Force, of a number
of community members, including businesses, non-profit organizations and social service agencies.
These interviews proved pivotal in the development of the thinking of the Task Force. A synopsis of
these interviews is provided later in this report.
In April of 1995 the Task Force concluded that it would recommend to the City of Stillwater that two
separate tracks be pursued regarding the use of Internet technologies in our community. The first is the
establishment of a Stillwater City Web Site, which will, among other things, provide access for residents
to information generated or managed by the City of Stillwater. The second is to participate in the
development of a community-wide information system, which would link municipalities, businesses,
schools, health care providers and social service agencies together in the service of community residents.
A number of other communities in Minnesota and across the country are building similar information
systems, and they have been dubbed Community Networks. This report is intended to share the findings
of the Task Force with regard to the interest in our community for such a Community Network.
e
Page 4 of 10
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
"
e Svno1Jsis of Community Survey
In February and March of 1996, several volunteers from the Task Force conducted interviews which
were intended to allow individuals in the community to give us their view of how our community could
benefit from Internet technologies.
We attempted to select a cross section of the community for these interviews, with an eye toward finding
at least one representative in each of several areas in the community . We interviewed businesses and
non-profit groups, with the intent of gleaning ideas from the private and public sector.
Most of the interviews were conducted in person; a few were conducted over the telephone. A total of 25
interviews were conducted, including a series of interviews with representatives of Stillwater City staff.
We have attempted to capture here in a personal way the perceptions and vision which the community
shared with us. We hope these compilations show the enthusiasm that is very evident in our community
for these efforts.
1) Excitement
The people we interviewed were happy to talk with us and expressed sincere interest in the
project we are discussing. In almost all cases we received specific examples of how these
individuals would use an electronic network today if it were available.
Without exception, these individuals have been seriously thinking about how the Internet could
be used to benefit their business or organization. Some have already made the plunge, and most
others are in contact with individuals or organizations who are actively engaged in the world of
electronic commerce or electronic information sharing.
2) Community Support
During our community interviews the Task Force' learned that the support of many community
members for an electronic network was predicated upon the enlargement of the scope of that
network to include a large constituency. At this time our best estimate of that constituency is the
residents of ISD 834.
Considerable corporate, municipal and private technological expertise exists in our community
which could be tapped to support an effort of this size, if real public good can be demonstrated.
If such good can be established, then community support will also arise, including that of a
financial nature.
3) Interest in Bulletin Board as First Step
The most obvious first step to most interviewees was a community bulletin board, which would
easily garner contributions of content by many community members. A community bulletin
board would be great for community newcomers, people searching for specific community
services such as health care and crises services, individuals who are politically active or just
curious.
e
Page 5 of 10
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
4)
Access to "Home"-Our Community
Most of those interviewed want access to information about our community, with two-way
communication between people in the community. We found real enthusiasm for the profound
impact the interactive aspect of this project offers. Easy, non-threatening access to city staff and
elected officials, as well as information on council actions and public events was widely
attractive.
e
5) Need for Coordination
Through the interviews the Task Force that many concurrent efforts to utilize Internet technology
are already underway. Businesses, non-profit organizations, municipalities and individuals are
all engaged in building or using Internet technology on a daily basis. Here is a partial list which
the Task Force was able to develop during our community interviews:
a) City of Stillwater;
b) Stillwater Public Library;
c ) Washington County;
d) Lakeview Hospital;
e) Community Volunteer Services;
f) Various Social Service Agencies;
g) Local Businesses;
h) Chambers of Commerce;
i) Extension Service;
j) ISD 834 Schools.
These efforts show a vacuum of coordination and leadership at the community level. We need
our best creative thinking brought to bear on fmding a way to provide leadership and
coordination for these efforts.
,.;
6) Concerns
Many concerns were raised in our community discussions, most of them related to the
management of a community network and its content. The major concerns we heard are:
a) monitoring/supervision of content (keep it safe and unthreatening);
b) guarantees of First Amendment rights;
c) commitment to collection and maintenance of content;
d) equal access, provision of public access points;
e) training and assistance for new users;
f) need for a community network to represent a large constituency, possibly ISD 834, or
Washington County, or the St. Croix Valley, even including St. Croix County,
Wisconsin;
g) proper management and support of computer equipment;
h) long term funding.
&.
e
Page 6 of 10
O~en Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
e Conclusions of the Task Force
e
1)
1996 represents for us a moment of unique opportunity for building a community-wide
information system.
2)
Although the community members interviewed by the Task Force were interested in a City Web
Site, most wanted to talk to us about the possibilities of a larger information system (community
network) which would link the residents and service providers of the larger community together.
3)
Public interest in a community network has reached a point where real contributions of content
will be forthcoming; educational and community services opportunities abound. The Task Force
strongly feels that decisive action should be taken.
4)
A community network will require a sustainable commitment to funding, content administration
and technical support. Without this commitment our efforts will fizzle and community interest
will fade. Formal administration is critical to the success of this project-a project built solely
upon volunteer efforts and good intentions will eventually fold. Practical uses must be evident to
residents in order to sustain their support.
5)
Electronic activities must be moderated to guarantee a safe, unthreatening and legal environment.
First amendment rights must be honored from the start, with formal policies established for
content administration that are fair and open.
6)
Training on how to use the technologies must be provided for residents, and public access points
are essential to guarantee access too all residents.
7)
The community should be open to working with business partners such as the city's cable and
telephone provider to bring affordable world-class communications technology to each home and
business.
,.;
I
. I
Page 7 of 10
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 199~
.
Tentative Recommendations for a Course of Action
1) Immediately form an Ad Hoc committee that is broadly representative of the larger community
for the purpose of developing a concrete proposal, within a reasonable period of time-perhaps
by September 1 st, 1996-for a community network.
2) Give that Ad Hoc committee a charge to develop an action plan for building a community
network within a reasonable period of time-perhaps with an initial implementation before
January 1 st , 1997. Specifically:
a) develop a legal structure for the administration of a community network;
b) develop a plan for maintaining community support for a community network;
c) develop a short-term technology plan for initiating a community network;
d) develop a long-term financial support plan for a community network;
e) develop a plan for managing the administrative aspects of a community network.
3) Solicit participation in that committee from:
a) Residents
b) Local municipalities
c) Washington County
d) ISD 834
e) Social Service Agencies
f) Religious Organizations
g) Health Care Providers
h) Businesses
i) Non-profit Organizations
j) Others
4) Implement the recommendations of the Ad Hoc committee, presuming the recommendations can
actually be carried out. .;
Page 8 of 10
'.
e
e
e
Ie
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
"
May, 1996
.
Risk Assessment Report
This Rsk Assessment Report is an attempt to outline the risks seen by the Task Force in building and
operating a community network. These risks apply to both the Stillwater City Web Site and the larger
community network. This list was compiled without legal counsel.
TECHNICAL RISKS
1) Failure to make long-term commitment to technical and content support personnel; either by
partnership with private corporations or by public funding.
2) Failure to provide compelling service resulting in inadequate citizen participation and ultimate
irrelevance.
3) Failure to provide fire-wall security to protect against hackers.
4) Liability with regard to hardware and/or software recommendations made by the City or the Task
Force to citizens related to using the Internet or the Stillwater Community Network
SOCIAL RISKS
1) Failure to provide universal access.
2) Failure to protect against child harassment, solicitation, abduction.
3) Privacy/Security: from public sector and from individuals; need cooperation from law-
enforcement.
4) Failure to provide a filtering mechanism with which parents can filter content for children.
5) Failure to manage or "moderate" Community Network content with regard to stopping harassing,
obscene, illegal activities.
6) Potential for accusations of censorship over City's efforts to "moderate" Community Network.
7) Potential for abridgment of First Amendment rights of residents in City's efforts to "moderate"
Community Network. ..
8) Potential for "technological elite" or "technological well-to-do" to exercise undue influence over
city affairs due to electronic access to decision makers. Some citizens could be sidelined.
9) Potential for movement of substantive discussions regarding city policy to an electronic forum
and away from traditional forums. Some citizens could be sidelined.
10) Potential for citizens with electronic access to community network information to receive
information sooner than citizens without electronic access; Examples: Public notices regarding
availability of city services; V AA schedules; Adult education classes. Citizens with electronic
access to this kind of information may be able to get in line faster for these services than others,
possibly even excluding those without electronic access.
11) Potential of running afoul of public meeting laws when conducting discussions of public policy
in an electronic forum.
12) Potential for Internet services supported by the City to be seen as unfair support for certain
businesses over others.
Page 9 of 10
Open Proposal for a Community Information System
May, 1996
,
Bibliography
Here is a brief list of research materials used by the Task Force. Many of these materials were written by
individuals deeply involved in the development of a community network, so the advice they provide has
great value.
Information of Community Networks
General Article by Doug Schuler
http://pubs.iworld.comliw-online/Dec95/public.html
How to Kill Community Networks
Doug Schuler
http://www.ilf.netleff/ ActivismlGroups_organizations/CPC/NPTN- Freenet
/dangers_to_comnets.article
Master's Thesis
Anne Beamish, MIT
http://alberti .mit .edu/ arch/4 .207/ anneb/thesis/toc. html
Master's Thesis
Catherine Weldon
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/communicationlresources/thesis.html
Community Network Sites
Boulder, Colorado
http://bcn.boulder .cO.us
Blacksburgh Electron Village, Blacksburgh, VA
http://www.bev.net "
, .
e
Charlotte's Web, Charlotte, NC
http://www.charweb.org &
Taos, NM
http://laplaza.taos.nm.us
Winona, MN
http://www.lumintet.netlwinnetlindex.html
General Information Sites
Community Network international gateway
http://www.usask.ca/-scottp/free.html
Community Network Information repository at the U of Michigan.
http://www.sils.umich.edu/Community/Community .html
Page 10 of 10
.
,
,
-
CITY OF STILL WATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-13
May 7, 1996
REGULAR MEETING
4:30 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Kimble
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Absent:
None
Also present:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
City Engineer Eckles
Police Captain Bell
Fire Chief Ness
Building Official Zepper
Public Works Director Junker
Fire Captain Glaser
City Clerk Weldon
Others:
Ed Cain
Press:
Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
1.
1996 Board of Review
Barry Staberg, Washington County Assessor, reported five changes in property valuation
were recommended. Councilmember Thole requested reconsideration of the Ivan Weiss
property, located at 107 Lakeside Drive, due to an inadequate septic system.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to approve
reduction of five property valuations as recommended by the Washington County assessor.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to amend the previous
motion to include adjustment of Ivan Weiss property to a value of $117,000. Ayes - 4; Nays - 1
(Councilmember Zoller)
Vote on motion to approve recommendations of County Assessor, as amended: All in favor.
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 7, 1996
City Coordinator Kriesel presented a proposal from a mechanical contractor to replace the
existing air handling system in the fire department. He recommended accepting the
second option estimated between $15,000-20,000.
Mr. Kriesel also explained the request of the Fire Chief to install a vehicle ventilation
system in addition to the exhaust system that is presently being constructed. He
informed Council that this new system would require additional design work and would
cost between $30,000-40,000.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to accept Option 2 for
the air handling system and to direct the mechanical engineer to prepare designs and
specifications for vehicle exhaust/ventilation system for the Fire Department. All in favor.
2. Barb White - Telecommunications Systems
Mr. Kriesel presented a proposal from Barb White, Washington County Information
Services Telecommunications, for a cooperative agreement with Washington County for
consulting services by Ms. White as Communications Project Manager for the City Hall
building project.
Mr. Kriesel also presented a proposal from Teltronix Information Systems, Inc., for
purchase and installation of telecommunications system.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Thole to adopt the appropriate
resolution approving the Operating Agreement with Teltronix Information Systems,
Incorporated, for purchase and installation of telecommunications system for City Hal1/Fire
Department building project and accepting the proposal from Washington County for consulting
services, and authorizing signing of Agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. (Resolution
96-112)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
Finance Director Deblon reported an escrow fund must be established for Levee Wall
Project funds.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to adopt the
2
f
1
-
. i
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 7, 1996
appropriate resolution authorizing establishment of escrow account for levee wall project and
naming Firstar Bank as trustee. (Resolution 96-113)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
2. Police Chief
Police Captain Bell summarized Chief Beberg's memo, including the following:
Recommended employment of Dennis Pasket as Downtown Parking Enforcement Officer
and employment of Anthony Spencer as Patrol Officer; reported SAHS National Honor
Society would be sponsoring "go cart" derby on May 19 and blockades and two part-time
police officers would be provided for the event; and requested authorization to sign
contract with Lakewood Community College for law enforcement training.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to adopt the
appropriate resolution authorizing the police chief to enter into contract with Lakeview
Community College for law enforcement training for officers. (Resolution 96-114)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
3. Public Works Director
Public Works Director Junker reported students from Stonebridge Elementary will be
cleaning ravine on Friday, May 10.
4. City En~ineer
City Engineer Eckles recommended hiring of James Grothaus, with Matt Saam as
alternate, as Career Development Engineering Aide.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to amend consent agenda
No. 10 to include Matt Saam as alternate for position of Career Development Engineering Aide.
All in favor.
Next item taken out of order: BCWMO update (No.6 on unfinished business)
e
City Engineer Eckles reported State of Minnesota has mandated amendments to Water
Management Organization (WMO) Joint Powers agreements. All members of a WMO
must agree to the amendments or be required to dissolve the organization. Grant
3
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
Township is in disagreement with the amendments for BCWMO Joint Powers
Agreement. If agreement is not reached, Washington County will take over the WMO
and form watershed districts.
Magnuson stated it is in the city's best interest to keep the WMO as it is because it allows
the members to maintain some control.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka, to adopt the appropriate
resolution endorsing the concept of an enhanced Browns Creek Water Management
Organization. (Resolution 96-115)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
5. Fire Chief
Fire Chief Ness reported Pierce fire truck was ready for inspection and delivery.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to authorize release of
check in payment for Pierce fire truck. All in favor.
6. Buildinf: Official
Building Official Zepper presented update on; building permits issued in 1996.
7. City Coordinator
Councilmember Thole requested that the City Coordinator write to the Board of Water
Commissioners requesting the Board accept water bill payments in all locations where
city sewer/garbage payments are accepted.
RECESS
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole to recess the meeting
at 5:50 p.m. All in favor.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK.
e
~
4
e
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
May 7,1996
Resolutions:
No. 96-113 - Authorizing establishment of escrow account for levee wall project and naming
Firstar Bank as trustee.
No. 96-114 - Authorizing police chief to enter into contract with Lakeview Community ColI. for
law enforcement training for officers.
No. 96-115 - Endorsing the concept of an enhanced BCWMO.
5
e
CITY OF STILL WATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-13
May 7, 1996
RECESSED MEETING
7:00 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Kimble
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Absent:
None
Also present:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Community Development Director Russell
City Engineer Eckles
Consulting Engineer Moore
Consulting Engineer Hahn
Planning Commission Chairman Fontaine
City Clerk Weldon
Press:
Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to approve the
minutes of the April 16, 1996, Regular Meeting; an~.April 22, 1996, Special Meeting. All in
favor.
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
-..
1. Ann Bodlovick, Central S1. Croix Valley Joint Cable Communications Commission,
presented check for $7,452.28 in repayment of loan from City for litigation expenses incurred
in 1990.
2. Presentation of Annual Heritage Preservation Commission Awards:
Jeff Johnson, former chair ofHPC and Mayor Kimble presented the following awards:
1) Best restoration of existing building: Lumber Baron's Hotel, accepted by Chuck
Dougherty; 2) Best re-use of existing building: Cub Foods Corporate Headquarters, accepted
by John Hooley; 3) Best facade on a building: Cameo Costume, accepted by Yvonne Cabella;
4) Best signage: Traditions, accepted by Suzanne and Michael Schumann.
e
1
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
Councilmember Cummings reported Lakeview Hospital has ownership of 12 acres of
property in the Industrial Park and Jeff Robertson, Lakeview Hospital administrator, stated
the property would be made available for use as soccer fields for and indefinite period of time
but no less than three years. The Hospital requested City indemnify the hospital for
insurance purposes.
Council directed city attorney to arrange for indemnification of Lakeview Hospital related to
use of property as soccer fields.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Bealka requested Item No.4, approving City Hall Building Project Contract:
Glewwe Doors, Inc., be removed for separate consideration.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to approve the consent
agenda for May 7, 1996, as amended, including the following: (All in favor)
1. Resolution 96-105: Directing Payment of Bills.
2. Contractors Licenses: Renewals - Kline Bros. Excavating; Able Fence Company; Schaefer
Development and Construction, Ltd.; Peterson Construction; New - Skyner Construction;
Timberline Tree Service
3. Authorize City Clerk to attend MN Municipal Clerks Institute
4. R'Cs6Iuti6n: Appf6-..'ing City Hall Building Pn~jcet C6ntfaet: Clc\V"Ne Doors, Ine.,
5. Approve hanging of banner on Chestnut Street August 26-Sept 9; Approving temporary on-
sale 3.2% beer license - St. Mary's Church, Wild Rice Festival.
6. Resolution 96-107: Approving full-time employment of Dennis Pasket as Parking
Enforcement Officer -
7. Resolution 96-108: Approving full-time employment of Anthony Spencer as Patrol Officer
8. Resolution 96-109: Approving full-time employment of Sharon Harrison as Assistant to
Finance Director
9. Authorize advertising for Senior Account Clerk
10. Resolution 96-110: Approving temporary employment of James Grothaus, with Matt Saam
as alternate, as Career Development Engineering Aide.
11. Resolution 96-111: Approving permanent employment of Bradley Allen as Patrol Officer
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to adopt the appropriate
resolution approving the City Hall Building Project Contract: Glewwe Doors, Inc. Ayes - 4;
Nays - 1 (Councilmember Bealka).
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Public hearings taken out of agenda order)
2
e~
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
1. Eagle Ridge/Deerpath Sidewalk Project, L.I. 322. This is the day and time for the public
hearing to consider the making of an improvement on Deer Path and Eagle Ridge Trail over
their entire length by construction of sidewalk, streets, and stormsewer, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such
improvement includes all those properties abutting Deer Path, Deer Path Court, Eagle Ridge
Trail, Mallard Court, Wildwood Court, Wildwood Lane, Eagle Ridge Place, Eagle Ridge
Circle, Eagle Ridge Court, Eagle Ridge Crescent, Thorene Place, Lecuyer Drive, Lecuyer
Circle, Lecuyer Court, Eagle Ridge Lane, Green Twig Way, and Kallie Court. The estimated
cost of the improvements is $261,000.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on April 25 and May 2, 1996,
and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Mr. Eckles reviewed the project, explaining the process of how proposed project area was
determined.
Mayor Kimble opened the public hearing.
1. Marge Cook, 761 Eagle Ridge Trail, spoke in opposition to the project for the following
reasons: 1) cost for streets and sidewalk, 2) landscaping costs 3) liability to property owners
for injuries on sidewalks, 4) routine maintenance of sidewalks by property owners, 5) use of
private yards for access to sidewalks, and 6) increase in litter and animal waste in yards.
2. Tom Lyner, 141 Deer Path, stated traffic is the main concern, not the need for sidewalks.
Although not opposed to sidewalks, does not want the installation of a sidewalk to put an end
to the possibility of making Deer Path a dead end street.
3. Terry Brodbeck, 825 Eagle Ridge Lane, stated opposition to sidewalks but wanted speed
controlled on the street.
4. Marla Wilcox, 1806 West Olive, objected to the sidewalk being placed on east side because
of maintenance concerns and no intersecting sidewalk at Olive. Stated preference for making
Deer Path a dead end street.
5. Mary Curley, 2282 Eagle Ridge Trail, expressed opposition to sidewalks because bikes are
prohibited on sidewalk, increase of liability and maintenance required of homeowner. She
also presented excerpts from MnlDOT study showing the following alternatives to sidewalks:
1) pavement markings, 2) street closure at half-way point, 3) speed bumps.
6. Katie Melhorne, 290 Wildwood Court, stated strong support for sidewalks, stating the need
for safe locations to walk and rollerblade.
7. Al Twardowski, 1226 Thorene Place, stated neighbors had done survey and results showed
speed was the strongest concern, followed by need for parks, bike paths to connect to
McKusick Trail, and bad cul-de-sacs.
8. Ann McLellan, 2336 Eagle Ridge Trail, expressed concern that homeowners and taxpayers
e
3
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
are liable for injuries occurring on sidewalks and are responsible for routine maintenance of
the sidewalks.
9. Tom Peer, 100 Mallard Court, stated he had sent letter earlier; he expressed concern with
heavy traffic and requested speed traps be set up and speed limit signs be installed.
10. Bill Lecuyer, 746 Wildwood Lane, showed a piece of street from Eagle Ridge, stating it
was not built to the specifications of the project for which he was billed.
11. Dave Curley, 2282 Eagle Ridge Trail, thanked neighbors for working to bring the
neighborhood issues to the attention of the Council. Expressed concern that Council
representatives had not made sufficient contact with residents to determine neighborhood
support for project.
12. Kathy King, 210 Wildwood Court, stated sidewalks have merit, but speed is the real issue.
She requested a trail be constructed to the trolley trail.
13. Bill Hamilton, 901 Eagle Ridge Trail, was opposed to sidewalks and requested control of
speed.
14. Gary Kriesel, 1451 Lydia Circle, asked residents to recall that the project was initiated
because neighborhood members had contacted Councilmembers with the focus on safety
concerns.
15. Sue Hibberd, 781 Eagle Ridge Trail, stated she was a new resident and favored sidewalks
for safety.
16. Amy Hooley, 640 Eagle Tridge Trail, expressed concern that she had seen no progress on
the pavement marking and signage discussed with EngineeringlPublic Works Departments at
a Dec. 13, 1995. She stated the majority of the neighborhood was opposed to sidewalks.
17. Jim Roush, 1016 Eagle Ridge Court, told COl.!Ilcil to represent the residents and listen to
what the neighborhood wants. ..
18. Bob Norris, 895 Eagle Ridge Lane, requested 4-way stop signs be put at intersections.
19. Jean Hoffman, 270 Wildwood Court, expressed approval of sidewalks for safety, but felt
speed control also needs to be addressed.
20. Leslie Mogren, 861 Eagle Ridge Lane, stated opposition to sidewalks and requested speed
control.
21. Bob Hoke, 206 Deer Path, stated speed is the issue on Eagle Ridge Trail, but volume of
traffic is the issue on Deer Path.
22. Tony Zanko, 540 Eagle Ridge Trail, reported he had sent a letter to City in 1994 regarding
speed, traffic volume, and road work on Eagle Ridge Trail; he expressed concern that the
problems still exist.
23. Jan Kutz, 2001 Kallie Court, stated she (developer) will be assessed on all three lots in her
development.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
.
4
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
City Attorney Magnuson reported the improvement was not petitioned by over 35%, so must
be approved by four-fifths vote.
Councilmember Cummings stated project was ordered to address the safety issue and keep
children off the street. He made the following recommendations: 1) install 4-way stop signs
at Lecuyer Drive and Eagle Ridge Drive 2) install speed humps 3) install bikepath on north
side of Myrtle to Jaycee Ballfield and stripe bike and pedestrian lanes on Eagle Ridge Trail
from Neal to Myrtle.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to deny the sidewalk
portion and table the road reconstruction portion of Eagle Ridge/Deerpath Sidewalk Project, L.I.
322 and direct staff to prepare report outlining recommendations made by Councilmember
Cummings and Deer Path matrix report. All in favor.
Recess at 8:30 p.m. and reconvene at 8:50 p.m.
2. Case No. V/96-12. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal of the
Planning Commission's decision by Bill and Dawn Tunison for a variance to the front yard
setback (30 feet required, 11.5 feet requested) for the construction of a garage with a bedroom
above at 305 Stillwater Avenue West in the RB-Two Family Residential District.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on April 26, 1996, and notices
mailed to affected property owners.
Bill Tunison explained his request for the variance. Mayor closed public hearing.
Planning Commission Chairman Fontaine stated the Planning Commission determined a flush
setting with the existing structure would better match the prevailing setback in this
neighborhood.
"
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to approve the
appeal to the Planning Commission decision for variance to the front yard setback (30 feet
required, 11.5 feet requested) for the construction of a garage with a bedroom above at 305
Stillwater Avenue West in the RB-Two Family Residential District, granting variance with two-
foot differential from original application and including Planning Commission Conditions of
Approval No.2 and 3. All in favor.
e
3. Pine Street Reconstruction, L.I. 295-2. This is the day and time for the public hearing to
consider the making of an improvement on Pine Street between Sherburne Street and Owens
Street and on Owens Street between Willard Street and Pine Street by constructing a street
5
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
and water line, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area
proposed to be assessed for such improvement are the following four properties: 510 South
Owens Street, 511 South Owens Street, 517 South Owens Street and 426 South Owens Street.
The estimated cost of the improvements is $10,000.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on April 25 and May 2, 1996,
and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Mayor Kimble opened the public hearing. There were no requests to speak. The Mayor
closed the public hearing.
City Engineer Eckles reviewed the project, stating properties at 510, 511, and 517 South
Owens were in need of water service repairs and the property at 426 South Owens was left
out of the original notice for L.I. 295. He reported that it is possible the property owners
requiring water service repair will do the repairs themselves because it is the most economical
method. He recommended ordering the improvement and preparation of report for all
properties, and deleting the assessments and improvements for water service repairs from the
public improvement project if a signed agreement is received from the property owners.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt the appropriate
resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans, Pine Street Reconstruction, L.I.
295-2. (Resolution 96-116)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bealka, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
Absent - Councilmember Cummings
4. Case No. SUP/96-13. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal of
the Planning Commission's decision by John Berglund for a special use permit for the
erection of a temporary tent adjacent to the northern end of the Lumber Baron's Hotel located
at 127 South Water Street in the CBD, Central Business District.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on April 26, 1996, and notices
mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the request, stating the SUP request for a
temporary tent was heard at the April 1, 1996, HPC meeting and approval of design as
conditioned was recommended. The Planning Commission heard the request at the April 8,
1996, meeting and denied the request.
Mayor Kimble opened public hearing.
6
.
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
John Berglund, St. Croix Preservation Co., explained the request for the SUP for a temporary
tent.
Howard Lieberman and Jay Michaels, HPC members, stated the HPC considered the tent to
be a compromise for the completion of the addition on the hotel that had been part of the
original approved plan.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Zoller requested City Attorney Magnuson prepare a memo regarding
required completion date for the Lumber Baron's Hotel.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to approve the Special
Use Permit for a temporary tent at the Lumber Baron's Hotel for no more than six weekends per
year, with review of the SUP at one year, and subject to all conditions of approval recommended
by the HPC and Planning Commission. Ayes - 4; Nays -1, Councilmember Cummings.
Council recessed at 9:35 p.m. and reconvene at 9:52 p.m.
5. Case No. SUPN/96-15. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal
of the Planning Commission's decision by Howard Kimmel for the special use permit and
variance for residential use in the Central Business District (CBD) with a variance to the
height requirements (50 feet allowed, 70 feet and 7 stories proposed) for the construction of a
74-unit housing project located at 301 South Second Street in the CBD, Central Business
District.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on April 26, 1996, and notices
mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the planning commission decision.
Mayor Kimble opened the public hearing.
1. Howard Kimmel stated his concerns were not with the proposed use, but with the height
and number of units proposed. In addition, he did not feel any hardship requiring a variance
had been demonstrated.
City Attorney Magnuson listed some of the conditions that fall within the defInition of
hardship such as a lot with unique characteristics, unusual shape, irregular soils, or other
restrictions placed on property by City.
e
7
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
Richard Anderson, 1401 Nightengale Blvd., stated he purchased property on 2/29/96 with the
understanding the UBC storage site property would be developed as a parking area.
Howard Lieberman, HPC, reported he was impressed with the willingness of the developers
to redesign the project to conform with HPC guidelines; however, his statement should not be
considered as a comment in favor of or opposed to the project itself.
Bob Lafayette, 105 W Chestnut St., stated that, as a real estate appraiser, he believes the
encroaching properties will benefit by higher property values and the City will benefit from
higher values.
Kevin LaCosse, Grand Garage, said he was originally in favor of the project because of the
increased tax base, but now believes housing and business in the same area are diametrically
opposed to each other, and will eventually cause a decrease in commercial activity.
John True, 322 S Broadway, was concerned with an increase in noise and traffic and felt the
area should be rezoned.
Richard Kilty, 118 W. Oak, asked if the planning review included a parking lot. Russell
stated availability of sufficient parking was a condition of approval.
Mayor Kimble closed the public hearing
Council recessed at 10:55 p.m. and reconvened at' 11 :07 p.m.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to request findings
of fact for denial of appeal, Case No. SUPN/96-15, a Special Use Permit and Variance for
residential use in the Central Business District, be prepared for adoption at the May 21 meeting.
Ayes - 3; Nays - 2, Councilmembers Bealka and Thole.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update: Lily Lake report - Joel Schilling
Joel Schilling, SEH, presented Lily Lake Storm Water Treatment/Water Quality feasibility
report.
Lily Lake area property owners Dr. Duane Nelson, Bill Fierke, Gary Warren, and Del
Peterson addressed Council, asking Council support.
8
.
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Thole to accept the Lily Lake
Storm Water Treatment/Water Quality feasibility report and directing City Engineer to work with
committee representing residents of Lily Lake to examine alternatives to water diversion and
grant/funding sources. All in favor.
2. Possible second reading of Ordinance establishing sidewalk improvement districts
No action taken.
3. Possible second reading of Ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Stillwater
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to table the second
reading of an Ordinance amending the Charter of the City of Stillwater to May 21. All in favor.
4. Lease extension agreements - Stillwater Yacht Club.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Thole to table the lease
extension agreements with Stillwater Yacht Club to May 21. All in favor.
5. Update: Proposal for establishing new TIF district.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt the appropriate
resolution calling for a public hearing on proposed modification by the City of the Development
Program for Development District No.1, the Modification of the Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans relating to Tax Increment Financing'District Nos. 1 through 6 and the Proposed
Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No.7 and the adoption of the Tax Increment
Financing Plan relating thereto, all located within Development District No.1. (Resolution 96-
117)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
Council set public hearing for June 18, 1996, at 7 p.m.
6. Update: Browns Creek Water Management Organization - (heard at beginning of meeting -
see engineers staff report)
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request by First United Methodist Church to block portion of William Street for 150th
e
9
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
Anniversary block party on Saturday, June 22, 1996.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to approve the
request by First United Methodist Church to block portion of William Street for 150th
Anniversary block party on Saturday, June 22, 1996. All in favor.
2. Request from Angela Anderson for City funding and permission to plant shrubs and seedling
trees along McKusick Road from Owens Street to Neal.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to approve the
request from Angela Anderson for City funding and permission to plant shrubs and seedling trees
along McKusick Road from Owens Street to Neal, at an approximate cost of $200 for seedlings.
All in favor.
3. Authorizing submittal of grant application for Livable Communities Tax Base Revitalization
Account
Mr. Russell explained the grant request would be for funds to pay asbestos removal costs
incurred at Maple Island site, making the development of the site more economically feasible.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole to adopt the
appropriate resolution authorizing submittal of grant application for Livable Communities Tax
Base Revitalization Account. (Resolution 96-118)
Ayes- Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
>,
4. Discussion of 1996 sidewalk rehabilitation project options.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to authorize
extending 1995 Sidewalk Improvement Project up to the maximum allowable 25% for additional
sidewalk repairs. All in favor.
5. Possible first reading of Ordinance amending fee schedule for mechanical inspections
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to table the possible first
reading of an ordinance amending the fee schedule for mechanical inspections to May 21. All in
favor.
10
e~
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
COMMUNICA TIONSIREQUESTS
Mr. Kriesel reported Internet Task Force requested a workshop with Council for 4:30 p.m.
May 14.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to set a workshop with
the Internet Task Force for 4:30 p.m., May 14, 1996. All in favor. (Rescheduled for May 21)
1. SEH: Request for Workshop
2. Washington County Board of Commissioners:
Invitation to Public Forum, Growth Patterns and Issues in Washington County
3. Stillwater Township Board: Environmental concerns
4. New City Commercial Properties, Inc.: Request for referendum for issuance of additional
liquor licenses
5. Washington County Sheriff: Invitation to Law Enforcement Memorial Service
6. Knights of Columbus, Stillwater Council, No. 1632: Request for sign variance
7. Stillwater Area Citizens Open Space Committee - Committee recommendations
8. Friends of Long Lake Homeowners Association, Inc. - Request for Study Advisory
Committee
9. BWBR - Professional services for Municipal Parking Ramp Kimble requested Council to
review all communications.
No action taken at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to adjourn at 12:50
p.m. All in favor.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
e
11
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Recessed Meeting
May 7, 1996
e
R~solutions:
No. 96-105 - Directing payment of bills
No. 96-106 - Approving City Hall Building Project Contract: Glewwe Doors
No. 96-107 - Apprvoing full-time employment of Dennis Pasket as Parking Enforcement Officer
No. 96-108 - Approving full-time employment of Anthony Spencer as Patrol Officer
No. 96-109 - Approving full-time employment of Sharon Harrison as Assistant to Finance
Director
No. 96-110 - Approving temporary employment of James Grothaus (Matt Saam as alternate) as
Career Development Engineering Aide.
No. 96-111 - Approving permanent employment of Bradley Allen as Patrol Officer
No. 96-116 - Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans, Pine Street Reconstruction, L.I.
295 - 2
No. 96-117 - Calling for public hearing on proposed modification by the City of Development
Program for Dev. District No. I
No. 96-118 - Authorizing submittal of grant application for Livable Communities Tax Base
Revitalization Account.
~~
12
e~
e
I.
. .
. '
CITY OF STILL WATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 96-12
SPECIAL MEETING
April 30, 1996
4:30 P.M.
The Meeting was called to order by Mayor Kimble
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings (arrived at 5:45 p.m.), Thole, Zoller
and Mayor Kimble
Absent:
None
Also present:
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Community Development Director Russell
City Clerk Weldon
Press:
Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
1. Workshop: Tax Increment Financing.
City Coordinator Kriesel reported the Finance Director had prepared an analysis of all
TIF funds. Finance Director Deblon presented an overview of the analysis. Staff
requested Council direction on proposed projects and modification ofTIF districts.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to direct staff to examine
issues and prepare recommendations and options related to development proposals of Gerrard
Realty and related parking issues; Territorial Prison Coalition, Inc.; and modification ofTIF
districts. All in favor.
2. Hope House - Request to block portion of North Everett Street during auction.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to approve the request by
Hope House to block portion of North Everett Street during an auction on May 11, 1996, from 9
a.m. to 3 p.m. All in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adjourn the meeting at
6:00 p.m. All in favor.
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
April 31, 1996
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
2
. .
. .
e
e'
,- I
J \ .
City o~
g HQQwatell, u\Jl innegota
CellH~icate o~ cApplleciaHon
pltegel'lted to
e
TRAVIS PEPIN
From the Stillwater Human Rights Commission
In Appreciation for his artistic contribution,
best illustrating our mission statement:
To promote a community of harmony
and respect for the rights and dignity of all.
.~ I
Presented this 21st day of May, 1996.
e
uUayolt
City O~
g tiQQwate/l, u\A innegota
Ce/ltibicate ob cApp/leCiation
pltegented to
~,j' 1
JL ,
e
TINA HANSON
From the Stillwater Human Rights Commission
In Appreciation for her artistic contribution,
best illustrating our mission statement:
To promote a community of harmony
and respect for the rights and dignity of all.
(;
Presented this 21 st day of May, 1996.
uUayol!
e
J
City O~
g HQQwatefl, uUi~Hlegota
CeflHbicate ob cAppfleciatiO"
ptresetlted to
e
MAYA HANSON
From the Stillwater Human Rights Commission
In Appreciation for her artistic contribution,
best illustrating our mission statement:
To promote a community of harmony
and respect for the rights and dignity of all.
Presented this 21st day of May, 1996.
e
vUaYO/l
. \
e
February 16, 19c6
~ayor an1 City Council
City of Stillwater
City Fall
216 Nort~ 4th Street
Stillwater, r~ 55002
~e: Lot 4, ~lock 1 Dalla~er Estates
1033 West Sycamore Street
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
In reference to the above lot, we are requesting ttat the
interest accruing on the bonds for the watermain ani sec charge
be stopped. According to our records, the bonds have been paid.
\
\
\
.,
If this interest continues to accrue and we decide to sell
the lot in, say, 10 years, thewatermain and SOC crArge would be
excessive and a deterrent to a prospective purc~aser of that lot.
For now, the lot is vacant, benefiting the nei~tborhood with
much appreciated open space.
~;
When this matter is discussed, we would like tre opportunity
to be present to d.iscuss it with you.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
\
V f:try truly yours,
fJ::it 1-1 ~
~~~
Pa{ and R~r Foyt
1351 Dallager Court
Stillwater, MN 55082
e
r
~T(fRN IlRR~ON
. Architecture
Lan d s cap e
Architecture
R ~ ~ 0 [ I R T ( ~
.
.
City Council Members
Attn: Nile Kriesel
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to bring to your attention for review and a response for a re-occurring problem. I am a resident at 809
North Fourth Street and have property that encompasses the North Fourth and Elm Street ravine along hs westem
edge. (See plan) The city storm and sannary sewer run through the ravine.
6 May 1996
We are experiencing a serious erosion problem at the ravine. Repairs were made to the sannary and storm sewers
in the ravine in 1993. Those repairs required a~eration of the ravines original storm water run off flow via an
extension of the existing concrete drainage channel. This also required some grading and rock installation.
In summer of 1994, we began to notice increased quantity of erosion and undercutting of the ravine slopes. It is
also appears that the 1994 concrete repairs made to the ravine drainage channel have been undercut and have
shifted several feet. This appears to be a direct resun of the grading and concrete work. This continued through
the spring and summer of 1995. Most recently, we noticed that a large chunk of a hill, containing 3-410. dia. trees,
slid down to the ravine bottom. The slide has exposed a large area of unprotected sandy soils that is very
susceptible to greater erosion. The erosion appears to be severe enough to threaten the loss of several large
trees, the stable slopes, the yard area and eventually the office building at 807 North Fourth Street.
We are aware of the SEH Storm Sewer Feasibility Study prepared in 1995. We have spoken to and met whh the
City Engineer and expressed our concems. We have been told the 4th Street ravine is not a priority Rem for the
City. We feel this has reached a level which is in immediate need of attention and may be approaching a level
beyond repair. The stability of the slopes has become questionable and is now a public safety issue. We are
seeking a response which addresses:
-The city's repair plans, both short and long term
-A schedule for work to begin and be completed
-The city's plans for obtaining an easement for the storm and sanhary sewer
I have enclosed several photos documenting the situation for your review. Because ravines are a unique and
important part of Stillwater, we are confident you will be as concerned as we are and respond promptly. We are
available and interested in helping to expedhe this project.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely .
--b-
Tim Stefan
807 North Fourth Slreet St Ilwater MN 55082
Telephone 612,430.0056 Facsimile 612.439.1179
~
~
~
~
~'-"
~~
:J
:-l
:-,
~=J
;:-l
[-,
~
Ll
r~
L...
tJ
tJ
\
tJ
ttI
-
-,
;..
,::>-,
lL:
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION 96-119
,Adahl, Chris
.erect, Inc.
Anderson, Dick
AMM
Arrow Building Center
Bell, Timothy
Bjorkman, Todd
Brad Ragan Tire Co.
Burmaster, Russell
B.E.B.
BWBR
Catco Co.
Chemsearch
Copy Cat
Courier
Crotty, Thomas
CSCV Cable Commission
Cy's Uniforms
DAC Industries
Dakota County Technical College
Digital Control Corp.
.J..s Municipal Supply
olab
x Valley Systems. Inc.
Franklin Quest
G & K Services
Goodwill Industries
Graffix Shoppe
Greeder Electric
Hamble. Rod
Images of the Past and Present
J. H. Larsen Electric
JOhnson,Ron
Junker, Jeff
Kinsels Liquor
Kriesel, Nile
Labor Relations Associates
Lakeland Ford Truck
Lakeview Hospital
Lynn Peavey Company
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Council
Minnesota Chiefs Association
.Municilite Co.
orthStar Turf
Replace locks
Street Light Repair
Real Estate Taxes
Salary Survey
Treated Pine
Class
Class/Parking
Tires
Janitor Services
Rubber Stamps/Ink Cartridges
City Hall Project
Parts
Supplies
Envelopes
Publishing
Gas
Consultation Services
Uniforms - Police
Disinfectant
First Responder Class
Lift Station Repair
Supplies
Pest Removal
Ballfield Striping
Planners/Refills
Uniforms
Recycling Jan-April1996
Graphics for Squad
Repairs
Safey Shoes
Film Processing
Parts
Computer Covers
Work Boots
Claim Settlement
Mileage/Meals
Consulting Services
Parts
Blood Alcohol Draw
Evidence bags
Legal Services
June Sewer Service
Reference Manual
Parts
Parts
356.70
621.00
777.02
75.00
36.11
15.01
11.71
681.43
360.00
158.33
5,694.39
338.34
253.23
63.78
213.01
10.00
59.40
1,839.29
147.07
175.00
119.75
312.92
218.33
109.16
42.39
1,171.78
1,299.16
180.73
11,478.00
19.99
11.33
208.14
34.58
36.49
1,200.00
45.35
576.00
69.36
40.00
63.60
8,122.48
83,380.00
24.50
189.04
395.67
.
LIST OF BILLS,
EXHIBIT .iA" TO RESOLUTION 96-119
e Amdahl, Chris
Amerect, Inc.
Anderson, Dick
AMM
Arrow Building Center
Bell, Timothy
Bjorkman, Todd
Brad Ragan Tire Co.
Burmaster, Russell
B.E.B.
BWBR
Catco Co.
Chemsearch
Copy Cat
Courier
Crotty, Thomas
CSCV Cable Commission
Cy's Uniforms
DAC Industries
Dakota County Technical College
Digital Control Corp.
D. J.'s Municipal Supply
Ecolab
Fox Valley Systems, Inc.
Franklin Quest
G & K Services
Goodwill Industries
Graffix Shoppe
Greeder Electric
Hamble, Rod
Images of the Past and Present
J. H. Larsen Electric
Johnson, Ron
Junker, Jeff
Kinsels Liquor
Kriesel, Nile
Labor Relations Associates
Lakeland Ford Truck
Lakeview Hospital
Lynn Peavey Company
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Council
Minnesota Chiefs Association
i A Municilite Co.
. NorthStar Turf
Replace locks
Street Light Repair
Real Estate Taxes
Salary Survey
Treated Pine
Class
Class/Parking
Tires
Janitor Services
Rubber Stampsllnk Cartridges
City Hall Project
Parts
Supplies
Envelopes
Publishing
Gas
Consultation Services
Uniforms - Police
Disinfectant
First Responder Class
Lift Station Repair
Supplies
Pest Removal
Ballfield Striping
Planners/Refills
Uniforms
Recycling Jan-April1996
Graphics for Squad
Repairs
Safey Shoes
Film Processing
Parts
Computer Covers
Work Boots
Claim Settlement
Mileage/Meals
Consulting Services
Parts
Blood Alcohol Draw
Evidence bags
Legal Services
June Sewer Service
Reference Manual
Parts
Parts
356.70
621.00
777.02
75.00
36.11
15.01
11.71
681.43
360.00
158.33
5,694.39
338.34
253.23
63.78
213.01
10.00
59.40
1,839.29
147.07
175.00
119.75
312.92
218.33
109.16
42.39
1,003.90
324.79
180.73
11,478.00
19.99
11.33
208.14
34.58
36.49
. .. 1,200.00
, ". 45.35
",,,"" 576.00
69.36
40.00
63.60
8,122.48
83,380.00
24.50
189.04
395.67
Norwest Banks
Peltier, Bill
Pointe Business Printing
Polar Chevrolet
P.O.S.T.
Snyder Drug
St. Cloud State University
St. Croix Office Supplies
Tactics
Thompson Hardware
Treadway Graphics
University of Minnesota
Valley Auto
Viking Office Supplies
Village Brass
Wal Mart
Washington County Treasurer
Watson, Dennis
Paying Agent Fees
Fuel for Fire Truck
Envelopes
Squad Cars
License Appl. - Spencer
Film and Processing
Classes
Copy paper
Shotguns
Supplies
DARE Items
Clerks Institute
Parts
Office Supplies
Plaques
Supplies
Copier Paper
Computer Programming
600.00
, 20.00
325.93
35,012.00
15.00
54.18
644.00
23.41
3,805.66
184.84
371.13
320.00
116.09
318.28
161.56
31.20
142.11
505.00
..~
e
e
e
No.
96-22
$40.00
GENERAL CORPORATE LICENSE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
City of Stillwater
County of Washington
WHEREAS, Performance Pool and Spa has paid the sum of Forty and OO/JOOs Dollars to the
Treasurer of said City as required by the Ordinances of said City and complied with all the requirements
of said Ordinances necessary for obtaining this licenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, By order of the City Council, and by virtue hereof, the said Performance Pool
and Spa 1890 Woodale Drive Woodbury MN 55119 is hereby licensed and authorized to General
Contractor for the period of one year starting May 8, 1996 and ending May 8, 1997 subject to all the
conditions and provisions of said Ordinances.
Given under my hand and the corporate seal of the City of Stillwater this 21st day of May A.D. 1996.
Attest:
Mayor:
e
e
i e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer v-t....--
DATE: May 17, 1996
SUBJECT: Purchase of Parks Equipment
DISCUSSION
Stillwater Parks received money from the Stillwater Elk's Lodge No. 179 for the purchase of two
new back pack blowers and one medium chain saw. Staff is requesting that council authorize
purchase of these items for an amount not to exceed $1,400.
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
DATE: May 17, 1996
SUBJECT: Permission to hire Chris Diethert for temporary summer help
DISCUSSION
Staff has received applications for Parks and Public Works Department Temporary Summer
help. Staff is currently in the process of reviewing applications. Due to the temporary vacancy
of a permanent position in the Parks Department the Parks Department has a critical shortage of
personnel. Chris Diethert applied for the summer position and has worked in this capacity in the
past. Staff is requesting that council authorize the hiring of Chris Diethert for summer help at
$8.00 an hour for 67 days effective May 23, 1996.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
APPROVING TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF
CHRIS DIETHERT AS PUBLIC WORKS/P ARKS SUMMER LABORER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the
temporary employment of Chris Diethert as Public WorksIParks Laborer, from and after May
23, 1996, for a period of 67 days, is hereby approved; and that as compensation for services
the said Chris Diethert shall receive the sum of $8 per hour.
Adopted by the Council this 21st day of May, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
e
e
e
e
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
APPROVING PERMANENT EMPLOYMENT OF CRAIG PETERSON
AS PATROL SERGEANT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the permanent full-time
employment of Craig Peterson as Patrol Sergeant from and after May 1, 1996, having served
a probationary period of twelve months, is hereby approved.
Adopted by Council this 21 st day of May, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
e
e
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM
LICENSED IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING
333 NORTH MAIN STREET. SUITE #202 . P.O. Box 438 . STILLWATER. MN 55082
TELEPHONE: (612) 439-9464 . TELECOPIER: (612) 439-5M I
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
MATTHEW A. STAEHLlNG
LEGAL ASSISTANTS:
MELODlE A RVOLD
DANA SCHAUER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
Dave MagnUSon~'v\
March 18, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Central Bank Title Registration Proceedings
The City was named as a Defendant in the Central Bank Title Registration proceedings since the property
adjoins a frontage road that has been dedicated to the City and we are, therefore, an adjoining owner to
the tract that is being registered.
I reviewed the Title Examiner's report and according to that report, the survey and the description used
do not create any overlaps or any encroachments on the frontage road. Also, it appears that the
Northerly line of the right-of-way plat is consistent with a description that MN DOT has proposed for
the Northerly line of the right-of-way road.
Based upon this information, it is not necessary for the City to defend in this action and in order to
facilitate the Title Registration, I would recommend that"the City consent to the registration proceedings.
This, however, should be put on the agenda for the City Council since it would take Council action to
approve the consent to registration. Let me know if you have any questions.
DTM/ds
.
.
I-
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council ~~
FROM: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: Senior Account Clerk
Staff is pleased to inform the City Council and recommend Shelly Schaubach for the Senior
Account Clerk position. The position was posted in-house, with Ms. Schaubach meeting the
requirements for this position. I expect Ms. Schaubach to perform the duties of Senior Account
Clerk more than adequately for the Finance Department and the City as a whole.
The position is included within the AFSCME union and therefore subject to the wage and
benefits negotiated thereon. A resolution appointing Ms. Schaubach with an effective date of
June 1, 1996 is attached.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
APPROVING FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT OF
SHELL Y SCHAUBACH AS SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the full-
time employment of Shelly Schaubach as Senior Account Clerk, from and after June 1, 1996,
for a probationary period of six months, is hereby approved; and that as compensation for
services the said Shelly Schaubach shall receive wages and benefits as specified in the
agreement between the City of Stillwater and AFSCME Local 517, Council 14.
Adopted by the Council this 21st day of May, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
.
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
DATE:
May 17, 1997
SUBJECT:
Hiring of Steve Wicker for LaborerlMaintenance Worker Position
DISCUSSION
Parks and Public Works Department received over 200 applications for the LaborerlMaintenance
Worker position. These candidates were scored on a quantitative 100 point scale and the top 8
candidates were interviewed. All of the interviewed candidates were highly qualified for the
position. After the interview process and review of the applications staff has determined that
Steve Wicker of Stillwater is the top candidate for this position. Mr. Wicker has worked for
Olson Construction since 1978, he has been involved in the community and has been active in
the St. Croix Valley Athletic Association as a coach for youth basketball, soccer and softball.
Mr. Wicker has excellent references and recommendations and is enthusiastic about a position
with the City of Stillwater.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council pass a resolution hiring Steve Wicker for a 6 month probationary
period as LaborerlMaintenance Worker effective June 10, 1996.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
APPROVING FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT OF
STEVE WICKER AS LABORERlMAlNTENANCE WORKER
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the full-
time employment of Steve Wicker as Laborer/Maintenance Worker, from and after June 10,
1996, for a probationary period of six months, is hereby approved; and that as compensation
for services the said Steve Wicker shall receive the sum of $11.32 per hour together with all
other benefits of City employment.
Adopted by the Council this 21 st day of May, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
"';
e
e
e
Ie
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer /Zl:t' /'
FROM:
DATE: May 17, 1996
SUBJECT: Approval of Plans and Specs for 1996 Street Rehabilitation Project
L.I. 320, Job 96-14
DISCUSSION
SEH has completed the plans and specifications for the above referenced project. Staff is
currently completing the final review. The only significant change in this project involves the
removal of Tamarack Court from the project. As council recalls, staff met with property owners
on the effective streets and Tamarack Court was removed from the project, Bayberry Court and
Cottonwood were not. After meeting with the residents, they were in general agreement with the
city's plan to complete these two streets.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council approve the plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for
bids for the 1996 Street Rehabilitation Project, L.I. 320.
-
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
DATE:
May 17, 1996
SUBJECT:
Accepting Proposal from Infratech Technologies Inc. for Televising of Sanitary
Sewer Lines
DISCUSSION
Staffhas received quotes from two companies (see attached). The low bidder was Infratech at
$.42 and $.45 per lineal foot for televising of sewer lines. There are a number of sewer lines in
the city which need to be televised, including Pine Street and Lookout. At these rates it's
estimated the total cost of all televising will be less than $3,000. These funds are available in the
sewer maintenance budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends council authorize the hiring of Infratech to perform sewer televising for an
amount not to exceed $3,000.
MAY-15-1996 14:20 FROM SOLIDIFICATION. INC.
TO
4390456
P.02
Jlrl1pnsa!
Page No. ,
of
. Pales
SOLIDIFICATION, INC.
$pectansts In Groutlnl .. Underpinnina
7233 Wmnetka Avenue North
M1NNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA 55428
(612) 535-1065
8-2026
I'ltOl'OllAL SV8Mlmo TO
Cit of Stillwater
$'mtEf
216 N 4th St
CITY. STATE ANt> %IP CODE
f'fiOM
439-6121
J08 fWot&
TV exist in
JOB UlCATION
1Mn;
5/15/96
sewer
DATE: OF f'INi$
JOII I"HONI;
We 'hereby submit s~lfitations and estimates for:
. . ..........,...............-.... ...... ...........,"....."..'....,..,..................................... ................................ .....j.. . 1....1,'...'......... ......._......................................... -., .11................,..............,......................................."'..""......................................_............'.'
Televise approximately 4,000 l.f. sanitary sewer lines.
.....1..............................................................."."............01.......................,..........,...........................,...."",...,""....10.'..'........................._.........,.............,........,.._. '....".............................-,...................................,..."'.."'11........',........._...........
",' ...,. ,... ",..,.'" ,., """". '.'" '" .""" ..."".........,........... ................... ................, ...'""... .., "","" ......, "..............""..-...........-.............., ......."......."""" .........-.....-. ......" ..... ...", ..........-........-......................,... ........' '-:(j,..........,..................'-~.
................."..', , , , ".."...."...,,:..................lJ...,p.ine,..Street, ..&....Faaement,.".................."".....,.....,....S.l3,2._00./hr. ,..,...........".J.."ft3...':~...!ET.........~f..!...~...:;::;
,.,.".,.,...",."""..."..:.",..."...2.>..".Lookout,..,st2:eet."....."....",..................",....",:".........".....",...,.,....$.l32_00/hr..........,.,.".,....~",.2,o..j...EL......,.=.~....,~.?,~....."":,,,
. . ., ,. ., ....., .................,... ......,.. ........ ...........,... "..,."", ...........,.... ........,._.". .......,. ..............,........ ..'.,........, ...,.1""'" ........,.~.. ..~.........._......_.......................". ....... -. ... ..... '.," ", .1."..".."........................ ...................._.......... ..... ...... ,.... ...~.... '.....,,'" ..
"',..".,.,"',....,...."..'!:......~.~.~~ ...~?,...~....~,~.~~~.,.J.:~.~,<?17.,"'~?..~.~y.~~....?.~.....~~~......"",..... "n",' .....".".._............"............"........,..."'....,....,....,...".,.,...........'
'..........."",................,....,........,"".." '"'''' ..........,....... ....." ,........ .",. ,.......,....., ...",. ; ........,.,....,,'.......".........._...................,.................. ....',. .., ".".,. ..~...."'...I..IIU"It"............................................,...........................,...
............,......,..................--.................................,.....".......:..'....'..........'."...."...'...................'....:..............-.....................................................'"""""
.,j;
. , . ...,....,,,.,.,,.... .........., ..........,....,...............,.".".,...................................................,............ ....' ".. ......................................-................................,... . ...... .."..... .,..............................\.................._:.........................................,...........,..........u........
1ft 'rllpIlSl' hereby to furnish material and labor - complete in accordance with above speciffeations. for the sum of:
dollars ($ ) .
Net cash due 30 days following date of invoice. All accounts
. LaJ:. l~ per mon~, ~ 1 to 8~, r
NI .".~r;al is ....r.ntMd ~ '" " .,.eitlM. All WOIto. ~ blt ,,_~ ill . WCHlCmenlille
...."".. .~COnli"llla Slanhrd ~ My Iftemlo" tK dwlatlon f""", .~ 1P"i1i~
tians In"aM", .."a Cflts will be """"um;r 9NY \IlK''' -Itttn ~... and wtll become an
... ellai'll" over and .bo... ~ esti"'ate. All ..~ "o~n,~ UlK''' Wlkn. KdcIiMtt
ftl.Y' lltyond OUr eanbol. ewn.r 1Io c:e,ry fire. lal'rlldo .nd ot~, ".''''''''''Y hOw.."c..
, W(llIlt'" .... fullY e~ by Watt<n,.n', ComINftUtiol'llbSu,an.,.. d~)'$.
!uttpfantt Df JtnpJlSa!- The lbovo price$. specifications
lln(j COnditions .re s\!IItisfactory and ar~ ~rebY ll~pted. You arc 8uthori~ec1 ' S1anlt\:re
to do 'the work" specitied. Pllyment will be made as outlined above.
Date of At"Pta~; $lptature
~l:)'1 ,D';IteM.
.
~~I,I""'I!'I"I
':I ~""I,":;; ."',,,",,,l.., ~~,..,,.. ~,,,~.,~i"l~ ~~t-:! '1
Infratech
Infrastructure Technologies, Inc.
6241'\. Llk"lollld AV('nlll' ~orth · Suite 100
Brooklyn Park, MN 554.
FAX (',1, : ;,',.tWIB - Phune.' 612/533-4525
May 16, 1996
Mr. Tim Moore
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater. Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Moore.
Thank you for inviting Infratech to prepare the following proposal rcr ~ewer
televising for the City of Stillwater.
The following prices are to perform each segment separately.
2.400 LF on Pine Street
900 LF on Easement South of Pine
700 LF on Lookout
$ .50/LF
$ .65/LF
$ .8S/LF
Following are prices if sections are combined.
3,300 LF on Pine St. & Easement
4,000 LF on Pine St., Easement & Lookout
$ .45/LF
$ .42/LF = 1'10
Thank you for considering Infratech, please phone with any questions or
concerns.
&.
obert M. Thul
President
I nfratech
RMT92$lm
e
to 39l;1d
H831l;1~.:INI
886j:1EE9Zt9
Lj:1:60 966t/9t/90
,...,. .
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: City Coordinator
SUBJECT: Salary schedule for Asst. Finance Dir.
DATE: May 20, 1996
Discussion:
The Council previously approved a starting salary of $36,000 for the Assistant Finance Director
position. However it will be necessary to approve a salary schedule for the position. The schedule
will also have to be approved by AFSCME Council 14 because it is a new position and is not
included in the present salary schedule.
I am enclosing a copy of the amended salary schedules A-I and A-2 and Appendix B, longevity
schedule for your review and approval. Salary schedule A-I has an entry level salary that is less than
$36,000, but in my opinion is appropriate for this position. This would mean that Sharon Harrison,
who was employed for the position, would start at the 6 month step. This would provide Sharon with
an appropriate salary and it would also maintain a reasonable pay relationship with other City
positions. As mentioned above I will have to meet and confer with AFSCME on the salary schedule.
(Note: I am placing this on the consent agenda but can discuss it with you further at the meeting if
necessary).
Recommendation:
Approve proposed amended salary and longevity schedules for the new Assistant Finance Director
position.
Af~
\.
.-
PROPQSED AMENDED SALARY SCHEDULE
.
APPENDIX A-1
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1996
'\:
Part-time Employees 1040 2080 4160 6240
Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employee Entry 6 mos. 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years
Sr. Account Clerk 2285 2428 2571 2714 2856
Jr. Account Clerk 1954 2076 2198 2320 2442
Secretary 2218 2357 2495 2634 2772
Clerkffypist 1904 2023 2142 2261 2380
Secretary/Dispatcher II 2285 2428 2571 2714 2856
. Secretary/Dispatcher I 2246 2386 2526 2666 2806
Building Inspector 2551 2710 2870 3029 3188
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 2218 2357 2495 2634 2772
Janitor 1818 1932 2045 2159 2272
.'
CSO 1954 2076 2198 2320 2442
Assistant Planner 2130 2263 2397 2529 2662
Planner 2664 2831 2997 3164 3330
..-
Pking. Enforcement Off. 1768 1879 1989 2100 ..',
~\"2210
Engineering Tech IV 2900 3081 3262 3443 3624
** Assistant Finance Dfr. 286] 3QOo. 3225 3404 3582 I
Employees shall also receive longevity pay according to Appendix B.
. 16
~..-
.
PROPOSED AMENDED SALARY SCHEDULE
APPENDIX A-2
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997
Part-time Employees 1040 2080 4160 6240
Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employee Entry 6 mos. 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years
Sr. Account Clerk 2354 2501 2648 2795 2942
Jr. Account Clerk 2013 2139 2265 2391 2516
Secretary 2285 2428 2571 2714 2856
ClerklTypist 1962 2085 2207 2330 2452
. Secretary/Dispatcher II 2354 2501 2648 2795 2942
Secretary/Dispatcher I 2311 2457 2602 2746 2891
Building Inspector 2626 2792 2956 3120 3284
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 2285 2428 2571 2714 2856
1872 1989 2106 &
Janitor 2223 2341 .
CSO 2012 2138 2264 2389 2515
Assistant Planner 2194 2331 2468 2605 2741
Planner 2744 2916 3087 3259 3430
Pking. Enforcement Off. 1821 1935 2049 2163 2276
Engineering Tech. IV 2986 3173 3360 3546 3733
** Asststant Ftnance Dtr. 2952 3137 3322 3506 3690
. Employees shall also receive longevity pay according to Appendix B.
17
PROPOSED AMENDED LONGEVITY SCHEDULE
.
APPENDIX 8
MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY SCHEDULE
\-;..
\
'.
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1996
After After After After
Part-time Employees 10,400 20,800 31,200 41,600
Hours Hours Hours Hours
or or or or
Full-time Employee 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years
Sr. Account Clerk 56.00 112.00 168.00 200.00
Jr. Account Clerk 48.00 98.00 146.00 176.00
Secretary 55.00 110.00 165.00 196.00
Clerkffypist 48.00 98.00 146.00 176.00
. Secretary/Dispatcher II 56.00 112.00 168.00 200.00
Secretary/Dispatcher I 55.00 110.00 165.00 196.00
Building Inspector 67.00 134.00 201.00 242.00
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 55.00 110.00 165.00 196.00
.
Janitor 47.00 95.00 142.00 171.00
CSO 48.00 98.00 146.00 176.00
Assistant Planner 55.00 110.00 165.00 196.00
Planner 68.00 136.00 204.00 245.00
Pking. Enforcement Off. 44.00 89.00 133.00 160.00
Engineering Tech. IV 74.00 148.00 222.00 268.00
70.,00 140.00 210.00 250.00
18
DONALD L. BEBERG
rHIEF OF POLICE
· Iwater
TIMOTHY J. BELL
CAPTAIN
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
M EM 0 RAN D UM
FROM:
D.L. BEBERG, CHIEF OF POLICE
TO:
1'-1AYOR l<lMBLE AI\ID CITY (;CHiNe lL
DATE:
I'-'IAY 17, 1996
RE:
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS FOR MAY 21st
--------------------------------------------------------------------
CRAIG PETERSON WAS APPOINTED PATROL SERGEANT ON MAY 1, 1995. HIS
PROBATIONARY PERIOD WAS COMPLETED ON MAY 1, 1996. I ASK THAT THE
NECESSARY RESOLUTION BE PASSED MAKING HIS POSITION PERMANENT. THIS
ITEM IS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
THE TWO 1996 SQUAD CARS ARE HERE AND ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BEING
PUT IN SERVICE. DUE TO THIS, WE WILL BE SELLING A 1994 CHEVROLET
CAPRICE AND A 1989 CHEVROLET CAPRICE. I AM ASKING THE FOLLOWING IN
REFERENCE TO THE SALE OF THE 2 CARS:
1). ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY HAS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN
PURCHASING THE 1994 CHEVROLET FOR THEIR PURSUIT DRIVING CLASSES.
I CHECKED WITH POLAR CHEVROLET AND THEY SAID A FAIR PRICE FOR THE
CAR WOULD BE $7,500.00. I AM ASKING PERMISSION TO SELL THIS CAR
TO THE UNIVERSITY. THE 1989 CHEVROLET WILL BE GOING TO THE
WASHINGTON COUNTY AUCTION ON JUNE 17TH.
2). IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENTS CAPITOL OUTLAY FOR 1996 I HAVE
$17,000.00 TO PURCHASE A NEW INVESTIGATORS SQUAD CAR. DUE TO THE
DEPARTMENT RECEIVING COUNCIL PERMISSION TO PROMOTE AN OFFICER TO
AN ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATORS POSITION WE WILL NEED AN ADDITIONAL
UNMARKED SQUAD CAR. I AM ASKING FOR PERMISSION TO ADD THE MONEY
FROM THE SALE OF THE TWO SQUAD CARS MENTIONED ABOVE AND THE 1988
PONTIAC UNMARKED INVESTIGATORS CAR THAT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED, TO
THE $17,000.00 AND PURCHASE TWO LATE MODEL UNMARKED CARS FOR THE
INVESTIGATORS. I HESITATE ASKING TO BUY ONE NEW INVESTIGATORS CAR
THIS YEAR ($17,000.00) AND ASK TO BUY ANOTHER NEW ONE IN 1997 AS
WE WILL BE ASKING TO REPLACE THREE PATROL CARS IN 1997.
Ie
I
96-25
212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Business Phone: (612) 439-1314 · 439-1336 · FAX: 439-0456
Police Response I Assistance: 911
I
.
.
.
I.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council ~P
FROM: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DATE: May 10, 1996
SUBJECT: sac Charges
As part of the fiscal impact analysis for the annexation area prepared by Tautges & Redpath last
fall, the sac charges are projected to continue and increase annually, by the rate of inflation.
(see attached page)
Although the bonds were paid off in full in 1995, staff recommends that the sac charges be
increased annually by the rate of inflation as projected in the fiscal impact analysis.
~
-
.
.
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
,
I
I
.
To the Honorable Mayor
and Members of the City Council
City of Stillwater
Page 25
Cost recovery charges have been proposed by SEH through a combination of the
following:
1. Area-wide assessments to residential and commercial/industrial benefited
properties.
2. Sewer Oversizing Charges (SaC) at the same rate that is currently charged within
the Oak Glen Development ($527.32 per connection, increased annually by
inflation).
3. Source and Storage costs from the operations of the Water Enterprise Fund. The
Board of Water has suggested in a memo dated September 7, 1995 that the Water
Availability Charge (WAC) would be increased to approximately $400 for
connection within the expansion area.
I'
May 20, 1996
TO:
Mayor Jay Kimble
Council members:
Gene Bealka
Rich Cummings
Eric Thole
Terry Zoller
FROM:
GWO (Dick Olsen)
RE:
City Hall/Fire Hall Renovation
The renovation is going well and we are on schedule.
We respectfully request that procedurers be established which would allow ~ile Kriesel
to give verbal approval on emergency Change Orders that have an impact on schedule.
~ThiS procedure could include all or part of the following:
1. Change Order items under $5,000.00 or a contingency
fund of $20,000.00.
2. Must be an item that affects schedule.
3. Must have the approval of BWBR & GWO. Plus the Mayor?
4. Council to be informed @ their next meeting. Construction
Progress meetings are held every other Wednesday.
Therefore, the Council will be informed the following
Tuesday.
The procedure is not to remove the responsibility or right to review or approve all
Change Orders. All Change Orders will be presented to Council in written form
w/documentation for final approval and signature. An example of the need was at our
last progress meeting. Fire Chief, Geo. Ness, requested a fan be moved up to facilitate
movement of Fire Trucks within the Fire Hall garage. The cost was $668.00. Immediate
decision was required or it would hold up installation of HVAC ductwork.
Please advise!
CC: BWBR
~
e
--
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FR: City Coordinator
RE: Fireworks
DA: May 17, 1996
Discussion:
The City does not yet have a sponsor for the 4th of July fireworks display. I have been trying to
obtain a sponsor and/or funding for the display. To date I have a commitment of $4000 from a
local foundation which is requiring at least an $8000 match by the City. The City will need to
enter into a contract with the pyrotechnic company ASAP in order to prepare the display by the
4th. Therefore the council will have to decide whether or not the City will underwrite the cost of
the fireworks (i.e., $8000 or more depending on the type of display desired).
For your info, $12,000 will only buy a very basic type of display. I am attempting to fmd a
sponsor who will provide a level of funding that, with the foundation contribution and hopefully
with some City contribution will provide at least $15,000 for a better display. For your further
information the City did not include anything in the budget for the fireworks.
Recommendation:
Council consider funding of 4th of July fireworks display.
-
~~
I:
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City staff and Commission Chairpersons
FR:
City Coordinator
DA:
May 17, 1996
RE:
Availability of Council Chambers
It now appears that the Council Chambers will be unavailable after July 1 st. Therefore,
all Council and Commission meetings will need to be scheduled for the Margaret Rivers
room at the Library after July 1 st. It will be helpful to Lynne Bertalmio, Library Director to
be updated from time to time on the schedules for the meetings. It will also be essential
that Lynne knows when meetings that are not regularly scheduled (such as the Port
Authority or meetings involving larger groups) will also need to use the Library room.
The Library has its regular users so it will be necessary to maintain an accurate
schedule for the room.
cc City Counctl
'.
. ........ .
ORDINANCE NO.
e
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHARTER
OF THE CITY OF STILL WATER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN:
The following Charter changes are made to Sections dealing with vacancies on the City Council and the
office of Mayor.
ARTICLE VI. AMENDING. Charter Section 6.02 "Vice Mayor" is amended to hereafter read as
follows:
"6.02 Vice Mayor. After the election of its members, the Council must, at its first meeting, elect
one of its members as Vice Mayor, who will act as Mayor Pro Tempore during the temporary absence
or disability of the Mayor."
ARTICLE III. AMENDING. Charter Section 3.03 "Filling Vacancies" is amended to hereafter read
as follows:
"3.03 Filling Vacancies. When a vacancy occurs on the Council, the Council must appoint
another person to fill the vacancy until the next general election when a successor can be elected and
qualifies to fill the unexpired term of the vacancy.
When a vacancy occurs in the office of Mayor, the Vice Mayor must fill the vacancy until the
next general election and until the successor thereto is elected and qualifies. When the Vice Mayor takes
the oath of office and assumes the office of Mayor, the Vice Mayor's City Council seat and the office
of Vice Mayor become vacant.
When a vacancy occurs in the office of Vice Mayor, the Council must elect one of its members
to fill the office."
(
The following changes are made in Sections dealing with Boards and Commissions:
ARTICLE XIII. AMENDING. Charter Section 13.05 (Water Board) "Membership" is amended to
hereafter read as follows:
"13.05 Membership. The Board will consist of three (3) members who must be voters of the City
and appointed by the City Council. Appointment to and removal from the Board shall be pursuant to
Section 15.08 of this Charter. Appointments, except appointments to vacancies, are for a term of three
(3) years. Vacancies in the Board from any cause other than expiration of term of office must.be filled
by appointment to the unexpired term. Each member of the Board must serve without compensation,
must qualify by subscribing to filing an oath in the office of the City Clerk that the member will faithfully
and impartially perform the duties of the office. A term of office will continue until a successor is
appointed and qualified.
ie
ARTICLE XIV. AMENDING. Charter Section 14.03 (Library Board) "Appointment and Removal"
is amended to hereafter read as follows:
"14.03 Appointment and removal. Appointment to and removal from the Board shall be pursuant
to Section 15.08 of this Charter."
ARTICLE XV. AMENDING. Charter Section 15.07 (Charter Commission) "Appointment of Charter
Commission Members" is added to hereafter read as follows:
"15.07 Appointment of Charter Commission Members. Notice of vacancies on the Charter
Commission must be published in the City's official publication and mailed to all Charter Commission
members a minimum of ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of a Charter Commission member's term
or upon a vacancy occurring on the Commission. The vacancy must be filled by appointment of the
Chief Judge of the Tenth Judicial District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 410.05, and if the Chief Judge
fails to appoint new commission members within thirty (30) days, then thereafter the City Council may
appoint new members unless, within the thirty (30) day period, the Chief Judge indicates in writing to
the City Council an intention to appoint new members, in which case the Chief Judge will have an
additional sixty (60) days to make the appointment. "
ARTICLE XV. AMENDING. Charter Section 15.08 (Boards and Commissions in General)
"Appointment to and Removal from all other Boards and Commissions" is added to hereafter read as
follows:
"15.08 Appointment to and removal from all other Boards and Commissions. Except for the
Charter Commission or where the method of appointment is controlled by State law, appointment to
Boards and Commissions must be made by majority vote of the Council, however, removal must be by
4/5th vote of the Council."
ARTICLE XV. AMENDING. Charter Section 15.09 "Notice of Vacancies" is added to hereafter read
as follows:
"15.09 Notice of Vacancies. Notice of vacancies on Boards and Commissions must be published
in the City's official publication a minimum of thirty (30) days before a vacancy is filled."
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this _ day of
1996.
.. ........ ...
e
{
e
,
--
I.
.;
STILLWATER CHARTER COMMISSION
City of Stillwater
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
March 18, 1996
Stillwater City Council
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Re: Requested City Charter changes
The Stillwater Charter Commission has worked diligently over the last several
years to study the provisions in the City Charter that deal with vacancy in office and
appointments to boards and commissions. The study was requested because of
questions that arose when recent vacancies occurred in the offices of Mayor and City
Council. Further, citizens have also commented that there is a hodge podge of rules
under the existing system for appointments to boards and commissions.
The proposed changes are the recommendation of the Charter Commission
that would establish streamlined rules for appointments to vacancies on the City
Council and also provide for uniformity in the appointment process so that in all
cases, appointments to boards and commissiol).s would be by vote of the full City
Council, unless a State Law requires otherwise.
The Charter can be changed quite easily, of course, if the Council would
consider adoption unanimously of an ordinance approving the changes. This can only
be done when the Charter Commission recommends an ordinance, since if an
ordinance has the support of the Charter Commission and the City Council, it almost
certainly would enjoy the full support of the community.
...
We appreciate your consideration and ask that you adopt this Ordinance for
these Charter changes.
Yours truly,
#~~
Laurie Maher
Chair
Enclosure
l
. J:
',..-
MEMORANDUM
e
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director ~
DA: May 17,1996
RE: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR STILLWATER FLOOD/RETAINING WALL
PROJECT, ST CROIX RIVER AT STILLWATER
Background
An environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) was prepared for the flood/retaining wall
project. According to Minnesota Rules, the public was notified the EAW was available for
review (see attached). Also, all agencies on the EAW mailing list were notified of EAW
availability. The 30-day comment period ran from April 8 to May 8. Comments were received
from: MnDOT, Metropolitan Council, DNR and The Freight House. The letters of comments
area attached. Substantive comments were received from the DNR and The Freight House.
Required project MnDOT and DNR permits have been received as required.
Response to Comments
The DNR comments were responded to by the Corp of Engineers (DNR comments and
responses attached). DNR has indicated that the Corp response adequately addresses their
concerns.
The Freight House comment letter lists three comment areas. A response to each comment
area is listed below.
1. Physical Noise (see letter).
Response - The construction specifications for the levee project require the contractor to
monitor noise levels consistent with the OSHA safety and health requirements. The
environmental report prepared by the Corp for the project further addresses noise impacts
(see Environmental Report Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Project). The conclusion of
that review is the "noise will be a short term adverse impact and the added use of the
improved lake front will add slightly to overall noise level in the Lowell Park impacts to
noise use considered adverse but minor."
2. Impact on building integrity.
e
Response - The condition of the existing buildings in the area of construction will be
inventoried and monitored for impact. It is noted that the soil conditions in the area are
poor and some of the buildings old and there is some potential for building impact
particularly the Dock Cafe. As a part of the project constructed, the effect of pile driving will
~
be monitored. The potential impact is noted and will be monitored throughout project~'~" ~
construction
3. Financiallmpact.
e
Response - Although this impact is not an environmental impact it is a concern to the
project. The environmental report addresses the business activity impact. The project will
effect the Lowell Park area. Unfortunately, the impact can not be avoided if the wall is to
be repaired. The city has opened the UBC lot to parking lost by the construction project
and has met with property owners to try to coordinate project construction and timing with
downtown business owners. The Environmental Report concludes that "considering all the
above information in the context of the total business activity in the downtown business
district, project impacts can be considered minor and adverse during the construction
period and minor and positive in the long term".
Recommendation: Based on the EAW, comments received and responses it is recommended
the Council determine that the project has no potentially significant adverse impact and that a
negative declaration for the project be approved (resolution).
Attachments: Comment letters from the DNR, MnDOT, Met Council, Freight House and
response.
,.
e'
, I
e
e
..
PuJJ It
Co f j
r illwater
,,~- - ~
--- -
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
PRESS RELEASE
RE: EAW for Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Project
An EAW Document prepared by the Department of Army Corp of Engineers for the
Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Project can be reviewed at the Stillwater Public
Library, 223 North Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082 or Stillwater City Hall, 216 North
Fourth Street, Stillwater MN 55082 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. The
Corp report has been authorized as the substitute EAW Document for purpose of State
Environmental Review.
The thirty-day review'period runs from April 1 through April 30, 1996. Please submit
any comments you may have by April 30, 1996, to Steve Russell, Community
Development Director, 216 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, MN 55082.
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
..
Publish: April 2, 1996
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
_ Law o.ffices
1400 m&T Tower
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis. MN 55402-2859
Telephone: (612) 305-1400
Facsimile: (612) 305-1414
~
4\1(])RE~
6Lr9/tr I~
e
/" /lA /.A ,Lawrence R. Commers
WfZ1 f V\.(/YV) Attomey at Law
(612) 305.1410
April 29, 1996
Steve Russell
Stillwater Community Development Director
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: EAW for Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Project
Our File No. 84399/1
Dear Mr. Russell:
We represent the owners of the Freight House restaurant in
downtown Stillwater. What follows is our response to your
request for comments on the March 1995 Design Memorandum and
Environmental Assessment by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for
the Stillwater Flood/Retaining Wall Project on the St. Croix
River, which you released for public comment on April 2, 1996.
We preface our comments with the observation that, from all
accounts, the project is so far along in both design and
scheduling, and you have released the EAW for public comment so
late in the process, that any comments you receive appear
unlikely to have any significant impact on the project.
Moreover, we have been informed on "several occasions and in no
uncertain terms that the City of Stillwater is not undertaking
this project and has no say in how it will be conducted. As a
result, there seems to be no purpose for the thirty-day review
period.
.
.
1. No consideration has been given to violations of noise
ordinances and laws.
Ie
,
I
A significant portion of the project involves the
construction of a new double retaining wall system, which
according to paragraphs 26 and 35 of the report will include 25
foot long sheetpile driven in, the water about 2 feet in front of
the lower vertical wall, and additional pile to be driven in
connection with the installation of riprap toe protection
(paragraph 28). Although paragraph 87 of the report notes in
passing that construction activities will impact noise levels, we
can find in the EAW no studies of the noise levels this pile
driving will generate, and no studies of the potential effects of
that noise on the hearing of individuals in and near the project
area. Our concerns are heightened by the fact that the bulk of
m
e
Mr. Steve Russell
April 29, 1996
Page 2
the work will apparently be done in the summer months, when
outdoor activities such as dining and shopping downtown are at
their peak.
2. No studies have been done on the potential impact of
the work on the structural integrity of buildings in
and near the project area.
We can find in the proposal no discussion of the potential
impact of the work on the structural integrity of buildings in
and near the project area. Several buildings in and near the
project area, including our client's Freight House restaurant,
are on the National Register of Historic Places. We have been
publicly assured by the Mayor of Stillwater that, because our
building sits on silt and sawdust, the pile driving will have no
effect on its structural integrity. There should be more to this
assurance, and the City should be prepared to provide the
necessary corrections if in fact these assurances are wrong.
3. The financial impact of the work on local businesses
will be severe.
Paragraph 87 of the Report notes that construction
activities "will impact noise leveLs, traffic, parking, sewer
service and immediate vicinity businesses during two construction
seasons," and paragraph 88 of the Report predicts "short term
economic decline will result if construction activity is not
scheduled around summer festivals and weekend tourism to
downtown." This strikes us as understatement. Our client does
fully half of its annual business during June, July, and August,
and a large factor in that business is its outdoor deck,
overlooking the river. It is already nearly impossible to park
in downtown Stillwater, and the usurpation of space in the
project area currently used for parking will make matters that
much worse. The noise and dust accompanying construction will
drive residents and visitors indoors, if not away entirely.
Couple these factors with the generally unappealing sight of
machinery and equipment blocking the view of the river, and the
damage to local businesses will be severe. Many local businesses
simply will not survive. There is also the possibility that the
impact on access to local businesses will be so severe as to
constitute a "taking" of property rights which would require the
City of Stillwater to compensate local businesses for their ..
losses. ...,
e
e
m
Mr. Steve Russell
April 29, 1996
Page 3
We renew our request that the City use its powers under the
Project Cooperation Agreement to encourage the Corps to work to
minimize the impact of the work on area businesses, either by
delaying the start of the work until after Labor Day or by
whatever other means may be available.
Very truly yours,
MACKALL, CROUNSE & MOORE, PLC.
b
r<.~
Lawrence R. Commers
344791_(.;JfIf
~fv
~~
?rvJ~
-
r;'Z"r7I
~
us Army Corps
of Engineers
St. Paul District
Environmental Report
Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Project
St. Croix River at Stillwater, Minnesota
.:~.
-. ,
=--., ~ I
- I
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
-
I
~SeJ
,
....
MULTiOISCIPlINED.
SINGLE SOUHC~.
FEBRUARY 1995
1
]
~
]
J
.,.;-'
~'A
J
''<~
iji:i.t'. ;
~-'~'
"
~
-T~'
.:
.
~
."
,-'t"~.. .
-~
4.0
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
e
Environmental Effects
Social Resources
Noise Leve~
An estimated 8,000-16,000 truck loads of material will be moved
during retaining and flood wall construction activities. The Lowell
Park section of the project will be constructed in one construction
season and the new extensions will be built the subsequent season.
The noise levels will be elevated for approximately one half year,
in two sequential years. The impacts to quality of life from this
additional noise can be mitigated using restrictions on the hours of
equipment operation and by maintaining vehicle noise mufflers.
Because construction noise will be a short term adverse impact and
the added use of the improved lakefront will add slightly to the
overall noise level in the Lowell Park area, impacts to noise are
considered adverse, but minor.
Transportation, Public and Private
The construction of this project will have two major impacts on
Downtown Stillwater. Traffic flow and parking construction
activities, lost parking and restriction of street circulation can have
a relatively large negative impact if not properly controlled.
Removing materials will add 4,000 to 8,000 one-way trips to the
area. Bringing in materials will add 4,000 to 8,000 one-way trips.
(These figures are pased on 20 c.Y. or 10 c.Y. trucks). Average
daily traffic on Main Street was approximately 16,500 in 1992, and
it can be expected to be higher during project construction. Even
a moderate increase will add to the existing congestion.
Construction traffic can be expected to add several hundred trips
a day to the traffic count.
The construction of the flood wall will remove all parking east of
the railroad tracks at sometime. The existing river side parking lot
has 72 spaces and is 95 percent utilized during the days and 100
percent utilized nights and weekends during summers. The Cub
Foods parking area north of Chestnut Street is 100 percent utilized
during days and generally less at night (although occasionally full
on weekends). The moving of the Cub Food headquarters to the
building on Third Avenue and Pine Street will reduce demands for
parking in this area. However, the proposed hotel to be built on
the site of the Hooley store will add a similar demand evenings and
early to mid-mornings.
e
.
Stillwater Flood & Retaining Wall- Environmental Report
St. Croix River at Stillwater, Minnesota
Page 41
]
~e
~
~
~
~
g
g
I
I
g
R
I
'I
il
'I
II
,Ie
II
ii
.
'.
4.4.6
I}usiness Activity
Informants for main street businesses generally foresee no impact
to their business resulting from the project. Any mitigation of flood
damage potential resulting from the floodwall project is deemed
beneficial.
The business activities most likely to be disrupted by any
construction activity along the lower and upper retaining (levee)
wall and floodwall are the off main street restaurants that face the
river and offer outside dining (the Dock Cafe, the Freighthouse and
P.O. Paddy's). Informants from each of these establishments
indicated that the timing of construction is critical to their business
needs, since the aesthetic value of a tranquil river view is what they
are selling. Construction noise during peak summer months could
cause economic losses for these businesses. To the extent that some
excavation and heavy equipment use can be timed for the off-
season, these losses would be mitigated. However, some minor
short-term adverse impact can be expected during the construction
period. Accommodating all the business desires would increase
construction cost and would be a minor adverse impact.
All informants for the business community stressed the importance
of communication in mitigating the impact of levee and floodwall
construction on their business. While informants were universally
sympathetic to the need to adapt the construction to engineering
requirements, they were quick to indicate that any forewarning of
a new construction phase would allow them to plan effectively and
minimize their potential losses. Again, this appears to be especially
true for the restaurants, who stock perishables according to the
level of business that they expect to do in a given time frame.
{:
For the most part, businesses, including dining establishments, do
not associate their level of business with activity at the boat
launching ramp at Mulberry Point. The exception to this is the
marina operator, who recovers launching fees, and sells petroleum
and related items to these boaters from a service island located just
off the ramp. Other businesses that expect to be effected by any
change in boat launching activity include liquor stores and quick
stops. For the individual businesses involved, these losses would
be minor when considering their overall customer base.
Interviews conducted with boaters at the Mulberry Point launch
site included questions about the amount of time and money
typically spent in Stillwater during a boating trip, and if Stillwater
Stillwater Flood & Retaining Wall - Environmental Report
St. Croix River at Stillwater, Minnesota
, Page 56
]
]
~
~
a
il
H
g
g
;
I
I
I
II
1.1
II
I
II
I
I
would still be seen as a place to visit if the ramp were removed.
The launch users included anglers and pleasure boaters, and
ranged from first time users to weekly users of the Mulberry Point
facility. All of the informants indicated that they spent some time
and made some purchases while in Stillwater. These ranged from
a few dollars for bait, beverages and lunch, to appreciable
expenditures associated with overnight stays and relatively large
parties. The net effect on local business of removing the ramp is
difficult to estimate. About half of the respondents indicated that
they would still tie up in Stillwater if the ramp were removed, and
some business activity may simply be displaced to Stillwater
businesses located above the town on Minnesota Highway 36, as
boaters adopt alternative launch sites.
In addition, new business may be brought to town by the park
improvements and enhanced opportunity for transient mooring
created by improvements to the retaining walls. Informant opinion
regarding the potential value to boaters of a new wall was divided.
Some indicated that the original wall, with a wooden bumper and
appropriate cleats, would be an attractive place to dock, especially
when compared to the rock-strewn shoreline currently being used.
Others indicated that they would not tie their expensive craft to
any kind of wall for any reason.
Access to several businesses may be affected during construction,
including the Andia~o Excursion Boats, the Dock Cafe, and the
Rivertown Trolley. fiming of construction and communication
with individual businesses are again the key to mitigating these
effects. The minor short-term adverse impact will not be totally
mitigated during construction.
Considering all of the above information in the context of total
business activity in the downtown business district, project impacts
can be considered minor and adverse during the construction
period and minor and positive in the long term.
4.4.7 Farmland
No direct impacts to farmland will occur as a result of construction
or maintenance of this project.
4.4.8 Food Supply
No impact to existing food distribution channels is expected to
arise as a result of this project.
Stillwater Flood & Retaining Wall - Environmental Report
St. Croix River at Stillwater, Minnesota
Page 57
.,
e
'-
\.
e
z I
I
flePi~
~J}
Minnesota Department of Transportation
e
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road 82
Roseville, MN 55113
April 24, 1996
Steve Russell
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Steve Russell:
SUBJECT: Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall
Environmental Review EA W96-0 11
Upstream and downstream of the existing TH 36 bridge
Stillwater, Washington County
CS 8214
The Metro Division of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the
Stillwater Flood and Retaining Wall Environmental Assessment Worksheet for impacts to the
state highway system. We find the proposal acceptable for further development with
consideration of the following comments.
Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way will require an approved Mn/DOT permit. The
permit required depends upon the nature of the proposed work. Lars Impola of our permits
section may be contacted at 582-1447 for further information regarding the permit process.
This letter represents the transportation concerns of the Metro Division ofMn/DOT. Other
environmental concerns raised by a wider Mn/DOT review may be forwarded to you under
separate cover.
If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at 582-1386.
Sincerely,
ctLcSffl a<.v~ ~ LL~{J(f
Ruth Ann Sobnosky
Principal Transportation Planner, Supervisor
e
c:
Gerald Larson, Mn/DOT Environmental Coordinator
An equal opportunity employer
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
i
e
April 29, 1996
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W)
Rood and Retaining Wall Project
City of Stillwater
Metropolitan District 12
Dear Mr. Russell:
Council staff has reviewed this Environmental Assessment Worksheet to determine its adequacy and
accuracy in addressing regional concerns. No regional issues were identified by our review.
This will conclude the Council's review of the project. No formal action on the EA W will be taken
by the Council. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Joe Mulcahy,
Council staff, at 291-6652.
Sincerely,
~;i
..
Helen A Boyer
Division Director
Environmental Services
cc: Charles Amason, Council member District 12
Keith Buttleman, Director of Environmental Planning and Evaluation
Carl Schenk, Alex-Edmund DaHinten, Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council staff
e
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TIY 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780
An E'4ua1 Opportunity EmplDyer
.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul. Minnesota 55155-40_.
May 6, 1996
Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Re: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Stillwater Flood And Retaining Wall Project
Dear Mr. Russell:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has reviewed the above-referenced
document and provides the following comments for your consideration.
The MDNR commented previously on this project to the Corps of Engineers in a letter dated
February 9, 1996 (copy attached). Those comments, to the extent they are applicable to the
EA W, are still valid.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. The preparation of an environmental
impact statement (EIS) is not required, in our opinion. We look forward to receiving your
record of decision and response to comments. Minnesota Rules, part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5,
require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this action. If you
have questions regarding these comments, please contact Ken Wald of my staff at (612) 296-
4790.
s~'nc"e y,
, '"\
. ~uJD
~
j
{ Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor
, Natural Resources Environmental Review Section
Office of Planning
c: Steve Colvin
Pete Otterson
Ellen Heneghan
Gregg Downing, EQB
Lynn Lewis, U.S. F&WS
Kathleen Wallace, Reg. 6
Richard Beatty, COE
e
960159-02
DNR Information: 612-296-6157. I-H()O-766-()OOO . TTY: () 12-296-54H4. I-HOO-657-3929
An Equal Oppmtunily Employer
Who Value" Di\'l,.'rsity
ft Print~d Oil RCl:yrh:d Paper Conl;,Jining a
f..I MinimulIl of 10',{ Posl~CnT1...uml.,.:r \\.~l'.tc
'~ STATE OF
[N][N]rn~@Li~
. · DEPARTMENT
O}/IZ.. Co0~
--
OF
NATURAL
RESOURCES
500 LAFAYETTE ROAD · ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA · 55155-40
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296-6157
February 9, 1996
Robert J. Whiting, Chief
Environmental Resources Section
Management and Evaluation Branch
St. Paul District, Corps of Engineers
Army Corps of Engineers Centre
190 Fifth Street East
St. Paul, Mimlesota 55101-1638
Re: EA, FONSI and 404 Evaluation for Proposed FloodlRetaining Wall Project, Stillwater,
Minnesota
Dear Mr. \Vhiting:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has reviewed the above-referenced
document and provides the following comments for y~>ur consideration.
From a natural resources perspective, we believe that the impacts resulting from this project will
be primarily those associated with construction activities. As such, they are likely to be minor
because this project is an expansion of existing structures, in an area of the riverfront that is
already well developed; However, we were not able to review the site under open-water
conditions and our evaluation of the project was therefore somewhat limited, especially as it
pertains to mussels in the area which may be listed as threatened, endangered or of special
concem.
As you know, our Area Hydrologist has had some involvement with this project, and there has
been some question as to whether a MDNR protected waters pennit will be required. There is
insufficient detail in the document to detennine if a pennit will be needed, but one will be
required only if the riprap at the toe of the wall extends five feet beyond the flat pool elevation
(675.5 feet). The document states that riprap will be placed "17 to 27 feet into the lake", but does
not specify at what elevation "the lake" is considered to be. The dewatering mentioned may also
require a permit if it is in excess of 10,000 gallons per day or 1 million gallons per year.
e
We note that on page 21, paragraph 107 the document mentions that boat mooring activities ar~
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
J
planned for the lower retaining wall area. This activity would also require a permit, and perhaps
would meet the state mandatory EIS threshold if the facility meets the definition of a marina. '<e
This facility, along with the ramifications of the ramp closure and possible relocation, will all
likely be discussed in conjunction with Riverfront Park improvements in the near future. It is not
a given that the ramp can be relocated once it is closed.
We did not find any discussion of landscaping activities to be undertaken following construction.
The Corps should consider integrating plantings into the project to add some biological diversity
to the site and to help hide the walls and naturalize the shoreline to the extent possible.
We assume that this project has undergone a cost-benefit analysis, although this does not seem to
be addressed in the document. We note, however, that the cost ($11 million, page iv) seems high
for providing protection for a 50-year flood event, equivalent to the 1969 flood. for which
damag~s were $926,000. The 1965 flood, a 100 year event, resulted in damages of $2.3 million.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions
regarding these comments, please call Ken Wald of my staff at 296-4790.
Sincerely,
~ ~(E3~~
Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor
Natural Resources Environmental Review Section
Office of Planning
..
c: Con Christianson
Pete Otterson
Molly Shodeen
960159-01
.
4J'
IZej~ Iv D/I//Z
c",m~Of- 2.-Q-1(, ~l2?m
Minnesota Department of Natura! Resources (MDNR) Letter - Date:F ebruary 9, t~ 1'1'
1996 _' ~ ;-
Comment 1 - Cowment on mussels in the project area (para. 2). E tr1/ltt,e
Response - The proposed project area was sampled extensively to evaluate the .
mussel populations present. The results of this evaluation are presented in the
Environmental Assessment All of the species found are common species and
their density in the project area was relatively low. None are listed as
threatened, endangered or of special concern species.
J . t
Comment 2 - Requirements for a MDNR Protected Waters Pennit (Para. 3).
Response - We have contacted the Area Hydrologist clarified the project
description, and determined that there will be a need to obtain a MDNR
Protected Waters Permit. It is part of agreement that the City of Stillwater
obtain this permit. We will advise the City of the need for this permit and they
will apply when we complete the Plans and Specifications Phase of the project.
If the dewatering procedure requires a permit, the contractor will apply for one.
Comment 3 - Permits for vessel tie-off area~ (Para. 4)
Response - After receiving additional information on the proposed tie-off
activities, the DNR determined that because the tie -off points would provide
only transient mooring sites this would not constitute a "marina" and would
therefore not need a permit. ~
Comment 4 - Reestablishment of vegetation1landscaping (para. 5)
Response - The City of Stillwater has the responsibility to landscape the project
area when construction is completed. It is their intention to reestablish the park
like conditions behind the existing wall and develop similar conditions behind
the walls in Phase II and Phase III
"
'e
Comment 5 .. Economic analysis for proposed action (para. 6).
Response - The authorization and funding procedures for this project were
unusual. Under normal Corps of Engineers' procedures, an array of alternative
proposals to solve the existing problem would have been developed and
evaluated by the Corps. For this project, however, the City developed the
proposed plan independent to the Corps, and went directly to Congress for
funding. The Corps first became involved with the project when Congress
directed it to complete the design of the proposed action and oversee its
construction. The language of the Authorization Act specified that the Corps
was to proceed directly into the design and construction of the project, thereby
.f
," '" '" '::,,", 0'\ '='11~;
'Tn '"1".1.&r"'T -.:l TTtfIl:\Trr
'..
precluding the need for a feasibility study and the resulting economic analysis
and the development of a National Economic Development Plan. Because of
this, the Corps did not determine a cost-benefit analysis for the project
a.
.
..
~
~.
;:-
.
e
[
e
\
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director ~
DA: May 16, 1996
RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF
LEVEE WALL TO MULBERRY POINT (CASE NO. CUP/DP/96-18).
This item was heard and recommended for appro~I by the Planning Commission at
their meeting of April 8, 1996. The staff report and minutes for the item are attached.
The item has been scheduled for this meeting to coordinate with the project
environmental review.
DNR has been notified of the Council Meeting. No additional comment has been
received from the DNR and all required DNR permits for the project have been
received.
Because of the levee's location in the Floodplain Overlay District, the Council has final
approval of the conditional use permit rather than the Planning Commission which is
typically the case.
A related item on the agenda is the environmental review for the levee project. Based
on the review and comments received, a determination that no significant impact will
result is recommended (separate item).
Condition of Approval:
1. The environmental review shall be complete before project construction begins.
Recommendation: Approval
Attachment: Staff report and minutes CPC 4-8-96
Case No. V/96-16. Pete Cote presented the plans. He submitted a letter of support for
the project signed by several of his neighbors. No one spoke in opposition for the e
variance request. In discussing the variance, commissioner's wanted to make sure the
building was far enough from the water line. A condition of approval was added to
ensure water line location access as approved by the water department. Motion for
approval by Terry Zoller, seconded by Kirk Roetman. Approved 8-0.
Case No. SUP/96-17. John Daily representing the applicant, presented the plans. The
commission had no comment. Motion for approval by Terry Zoller, seconded by Darwin
Wald. Approved 8-0.
~ Case No. CUP/96-18. Steve Russell representing the city presented the plans for the
levee wall improvements. He indicated planning for the project has been ongoing for
the past two years and that the design of the project was approved by the HPC at their
meeting of April 1 , 1996. The action before the commission is review of the conditional
use permit for recommendation to the city council.
The public hearing was opened. Restaurant owners/managers representing the Dock
Cafe, Mike McGuire, Trump's, Jon Daily, Lumber Baron's Hotel, Chuck Dougherty and
Freight House, questi'oned the scheduling of project work and ways through scheduling
to minimize the impact of the project on their restaurant activity. Mr. Russell indicated
construction scheduling was a consideration in the project and that this is a corp of
engineers project and they make the final decision on project scheduling decisions.
Commissioner Zoller suggested the city hold a preconstruction meeting with downtown
businesses to acquaint them with the project and help coordinate the project. The
commission agreed with the recommendation. Motion by Terry Zoller, second by Kirk
Roetman. Approval 8-0. ..
Motion for adjournment by Rob Hamlin, seconded by Glenna Bealka.
:':;
The commission adjourned at 11 :30 pm.
e
..,.
e
PLANNING APPLlCA liON REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. CUP/DP/96-18
Planning Commission Date: April 8, 1996
Project Location: Levee Wall
Comprehensive Plan District: Duplex Residential, Bluffland Shoreland/Flood Plain
Overlay District
Applicant's Name: City of Stillwater
Type of Application: Conditional Use Permit
Project Description: Reconstruction and extension of Levee Wall to Mulberry Point
Discussion: The project is the repair and reconstruction of the existing levee wall from
Nelson Street on the south to Mulberry point on the north. The project requires design
review (see HPC action of April 1 , 1996) and a conditional use permit. The conditional
use permit is required because the levee wall is located within the f100dway district.
A requirement for approval of the levee is that the project will not adversely affect the
capacity of the f100dway or increase flood heights.
Attached is the finding of no significant environmental effect made by the Corp of
Engineer as a part of the environmental review of the project based on the
environmental assessment (December 1995) and section 6.2.10.1 Flood Level
Increase, of that report. The report states the project with result in zero increase in
flood surface elevation over those obtained without encroachment. Based on the
environmental report it can be found that the levee project will not affect the capacity 0
the f100dway or increase flood heights.
Recommendation: Approval
Attachments.
Planning Commission Action 4-8-96: Recommended approval
e
" .'~
Case No: C-vP/f),P/1't-; 8
Date Filed: '3;1 (, -'1(;,.
Fee Paid:
Receipt No. :
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ Certificate of Compliance
CITY OF STILL\VATER V'Conditional or Special Use Permit
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET vDesign Review
STILLWATER, MN 55082 _ Planned Unit Development
Variance
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
Subdivision
_ Resubdivision
Total Fee
e
FEE(I )
$70
570/170
-0-
5270
$70
5300
5300
5100+ 5S0110t
S50
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
- submitted in connection with any application.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
/ L _ L . I.-h J-J1dJ/J11
Address of Project LI'V.f!.p.i ~~A1. M'f~ Assessor's Parcel No.
Zoning District Lr7J? Description of ~roject .~.# *4- ~/1JJL /~.-IJ./^
I'IVvfL ~ Sf-r:~ /I~~/>-
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, illfonnation and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify.J will complY with the pennit if it is granted and llsed."
Propeny Owner I ~ ~ J ft.U'~
Mailing Address 1~~~ _r.~~
Telephone No. ~J '1-~ I z.- ./
~d
,
s~
Representative
Mailing Address
Telephone No.
Signature
Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lot Size (dimensions) x
Land Area
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
Total building floor Area sq. ft.
Existing sq. ft.
Proposed sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft.
Number of off street parking spaces provided
Feet
.
(I)ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE REQUIRED AS PART OF APPLICATION
REVIEW
Revised 9/19/95
e
. '\ ~ . ~
\ ---- \
\':, .." ~~--- -------
t ..~ r
v' ---\'
, (~) /_.---- \
,-// \ ~
\ ~~
\
\ ..
\;\"-~
\ ~ -
~n.)~::" ~
. - \
----....------ --- \ .
,/--- \
\
'.,}'
\:"'
+ ~ ABBREVIUIONS
.., '""" , ......
........ AntIOXlw,&tQ.T .. ,....
" (A (01 ,.a.slll U ""
t.L U'StllK)M .... WAll.....
c^ COIltA UN( ""'" yf(1UlrlC.&L ..IOIH'
'10 Clu.o (.&.Sf lJION ,.rt
Ccoe. Cl)lC;~(U: ... ....a.,
_r?~_ (ONllt. CCWllUCtlOM .... 'UMI'AJW
c.... '''''''' .. OM ct_'U
'" ~~:I:l PI. l'\.A1t
... It(YlV[ .
..L Ou.t.l[fU 1lU\....
'!:) " tACl4 fiCX IIQ' 1f(1J#0ltCt'''
" OtH ..&1 COHCII(1[ I'll"(
n. 1l1yUIOH M:U#. Mlt#OftCo.v.t
U. ulimoG .(t. .Jl.l,. lll"'I""" ..lLl,.
" UrU6IOW .1)1"' ... IUQd
" fRONt ua VL vaeu 011
f . . nl.N4''''' .uG ViCINI;
OOS[J;Yt.T10t4 SfL sutlON
fT fOO' .to SI~&IlO
CAU. GAly&JdU ... "PICIL
ClIO OIl"'" ...,. V(JIflCAl.
.. 'dE. WAl.V'I " ."M
... ....,....,
.....L tOI:tlONtAL
l)f", .""'"
-~.;.--~<
~
'"
\':,
.
,.
GENERAL LEGEHO
. "-I\.\.
.,:.~-~.....
~Y.
-1-
__ _ _ .CHI \..w.n
___ we, "CltN U'l'tJ' ''''''AMo.t
_,I-- 1U.0>V00
_ wE' CAtCM "'SIN
~ stORW SOUl l/liWHl.&
--p.---o- s~un s.uu II\Wf4(
~ IlAHI JU.l
_h.~'.~.- =='~.:o'M.V
0' Iu..tp'WC)4: .,>>KIll
'..,.. I ...... l.H.l(~e&...o lQInOC
_C_CA51It<<
_0'"_ O\'OtC.ADI'OI[AIIC
_1_1 _1_ Nl"1...IUIL....:
...... "I ",n'l"ul
{ ~OI!lOO
....,
'..n;".....wt
..'Ull"",:
ItflC ....c...un 1f.M.1
f'tIIClIC lOU'IOM . flU
~.... lOUJl(llil . flU
flU.
CU,
A.,.."
I'ON $CWO ~'4D
...
0'.....IDfl
0....'"
T T T
Y ( y
r--"\ r--"\
////////1//
lrtO (Off.4CrOllt .cau
SECTION on DETAIL ~ttlC~'lI'lurtCM"""'" lilt lUU"
~
0111 .I~ ... OM ftttCM ""tOM
IS ~"III
GENERAL NOTES.
I. 'f~ti:.~~,~o:fr AM WOSUlltD nOlol ft€ "$D.lt.€ .":N lOCll:IM!; TouMJ
"", ,~
SToHC,,61ll'EHT
-L.........L--~.
iCIlllH'U'
~!
HORIZONTAL CONTROL POINTS rOR BASELINE
COOADIN! T( OISUNC( _'M
P.I: POIHT SUflOH NORTH [AST AllUUltl
1'.1.1 9'!~!1.4j "*,:;:" .)9!t!,.),Q _JlLIL.. !!I!:J!JLt~!
-':';-1- !J!~~.J' i!hin~L \O1"~,l" :j1~ !!U~ql!.12
~.!~C lO.U.t'l lIlOH.f" -iGi4t':iii !Ul:!"1!.!::!
'.1. . j!!~fiL iiii4ti.f ~i9!t"ij:"o!i ~!.~ !!2~91'.!J,D
~fJ= J!.~O;, !! t!~Q~!..!!L .~!I'~.J~L _11'" l!!i.2t:~
.u~,!.:.t l'!l".," _ ,01011604 _l~.~' !!&J!.n....t:!
',I I U.X).d )"lIU.JlO -;oioii:io(
.L .......ll~'.... 01 f.'.....
(1(""" ..".........,...,
S11ll1U1lR FlOOD AND IKfAlNINC ..llLS
.h(M t..o"~ (O..UI",- . ,.. ,MO'. .'~l"
cO'~~v, J U/UI Sllllw",Ut Sfll.lWU[R. "'",
; ~~~'~T~D??~~. STILLWATER FlOOO AND RETAININC WALL PROJECT
~..u... .lU(, ,.ROJ(Cr PLAN. A8BH(YIA liONS.
) l.~~",---u._.~w~:..~. C[N[JUl uco.a ANn CCkEAAl kQHS
.t(,~;~::,~.~:, .~.".. ',7.':1,,', ~:~~:;".~:'~l~~~:: .~"'--' Pl'7i(
\
,'.
, ,"r
I ___r--O
..'11111
I
A~'
;i";
~'
,~
if:
, '
f
:,,:..~'
,,~:~f,
~!
".', '
".. .
.'~:.~:~ "
.\ :
!f. ;
~~
.~
,':#i
c:'f
'.ji
.-.}
J
, ':.1'
'1
'J
I .-;;,
'J'
'5
I
I
l It
;, ~ I
. t::~". :~
e
Management and Evaluation Branch
Engineering and Planning Division
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
In accordance with the National Environmental POlicy Act of 1969,
the st. Paul District, Corps of Engineers, has determined the
environmental impacts of the following project.
FLOOD AND RETAINING WALL PROJECT
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
ST. CROIX RIVER, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
The purpose of the project is to prov~de bank protection and flood
protection from the waters of the st. Croix River for the historic
center of stillwater, Minnesota. Protection would be provided by
the repair and extension of an existing retaining wall along the
shoreline of the river and a floodwall constructed between the
river and the urban business district of the city. A detailed
description of the proj ect features and selection criteria is
presented in section 3.0 of the Environmental Assessment.
Alternatives to the proposed action are described in Section 4.0.
This Finding' of No Significant Impact is based on the following
factors:
1) Only temporary negative impacts to natural resources and some
long-term minor positive impacts to these resources would be caused
by the action.
2) Permanent substantial positive social impacts would result.
3)_ There would be no impacts to cultural resources.
A complete explanation of these determinations is presented in the
Project Impacts section (Section 6.0) of the Environmental
Assessment.
Our environmental review indicates that the proposed actions do not
constitute a maj or Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental
Impact Statement will not be prepared.
J. M. Wonsik
Colonel, Corps of Engineers
District Engineer
.
Date
'11111111
e
Environmental Assessment
Flood and Retaining Wall project
stillwater, Minnesota
st. Croix River, washington county, Minnesota
':,
>
~
~
~.
.
~~
","at
.;}
i
i
"'i
I
,',
,',
-'.
~.~~;
I-
DECEMBER 1995
"I.
j
'7:J
![,
l
~
attractive place to dock, especially when
rock-strewn shoreline currently being used.
they would not tie their expensive craft to
for any reason.
compared to the
Others indicated
any kind of wall
e.
I
Access .to several businesses may be affected during
..construction, including the Andiamo Excursion Boats, the Dock
~afe, and the Rivertown Trolley. Timing of construction and
communication with individual businesses are again the key to
mitigating these effects. Minor short-term adverse impacts
would not be totally mitigated during construction.
6.2.7 Farmland
No impacts to farmland would occur as a result of
construction or maintenance of this projec~.
6.2.8 Food Supply
No impact to existing food distribution channels is expected
to arise as a result of this project.
6.2.9 Commercial Naviqation
,
I
l
!
f
[
~
~
r
I,
No impact to existing commercial navigation on the river,
which generally occurs south of the project area, is expected
to arise as a result of the project.
6.2.10 Flooding Effects
..
The flood and retaining wall project will cause no increase
in flco nd some reduction of flood damage.
,..-----.
~0.3. Flood Level \ ~
.- A detaUed hydraulic mOd;( was prepared as part of the
hydraulic and hydrologic studies for the design memorandum on
this proj ect. The model was run for conditions as they exist
now and with the proj ect in place. Under proj ect conditions,
riprap at the downstream end would encroach riverward from
the existing bank and would extend about 15 feet into the
lake bottom. This riprap would remove a maximum of about 650
square feet from the floodway. The lower retaining wall
repair would encroach about 2 feet 8 inches riverward of the
eXisting wall. This would remove about 15 square feet from
the floodway. New walls upstream from the existing retaining
walls would extend vertically from the shoreline to elevation
677, form a I6-foot 8-inch horizontal slab at that elevation
and then extend vertically to elevation 681. This would
remove a maximum of about 80 square feet from the floodway.
i
I
./
. ~"fI.
~
.
The new retaining walls at Mulberry Point would be
constructed at the existing shoreline, have a configuration
~
EA-60
"1"""
.IIi,111
-
e
I I I II I ililllllll
I'lllil.'t~~,
,I
~
similar to that of the existing retaining walls and remove a
maximum of about 140 square feet from the floodway. The
/hydraulic model run for the, l-percent (lOa-year) flood stage
V ':lith all of ~h~_ encroachm~nts in pl~c~ .s~owed z.ero in,?rea~e'
~n water surface-elevat~ons--over those obta~ned w~thout
encroachments-:-----Tht-s--coul-d - be expected because the river in
this are-a -~resembles a large lake with very low current
-.velocity and nearly zero surface slope. Equal encroachments
on the Wisconsin side also would not increase water levels
because they would be located in the non-effective flow area
caused by the elevated roadway to the highway bridge.
6.2.10.2 Flood Damage Reduction
The proposed floodwall will extend vertically to elevation
691. A flood at that elevation without the wall in place
would produce about $1,153,000 in damages at 1986 price
levels and conditions as reported in the Corps of Engineers
1986 final feasibility report. Average annual damages under
1986 conditions of development were identified as $304,000 in
the Corps report. These average annual damages could be
expected to be reduced approximately 50 percent with a
floodwall to elevation 691. The seepage cutoff proposed for
the floodwall will intercept seepage and reduce seepage
damage to basements. The magnitude of reduction in seepage
damage is unknown. No analysis of average annual benefits
and costs was ~eveloped for the project design memorandum;
thus, the ratio of benefits to costs is unknown, but could be
expected to be well below. unity.
6.2.10.3 Emergency Construction
..
Flood damage reduction above elevation 691 would require
emergency construction of a flood barrier and a flood fight
to be effective in protecting existing public and commercial
resources. Continuation of zoning, flood insurance and
floodplain management will be required. These measures, in
addition to the floodwall to elevation 691, will be required
to provide flood damage reduction up to the level of the
l-percent (lOa-year) flood. Because no permanent flood
damage reduction measures will be provided to furnish
freeboard above the lOa-year flood, the downtown business
district will remain in the regulated flOOdplain.
An approximately 50-percent reduction in average annual
damages (about $150,000) can be characterized as a
substantial local benefit. However, because the benefit to
cost ratio for flood damage reduction is well below unity,
the benefit does not carry over to a positive, broad range,
national impact. It appears that the shoreline erosion
protection may have a benefit to cost ratio of about 2. This
can be characterized as a minor positive national impact.
,
~
-'l
EA-61
\ ~
.
.
Ie
CITY OF STILLWATER
WASHINGTON COUNTY
CITY COUNCIL
ZONING APPEAL
In Re:
Appeal of the Planning Commission
Approval of a Special Use Permit
and Variance for Construction of
a Housing Project at 304 South
Second Street in the Central
Business District
FINDINGS OF FACT.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
AND ORDER
On May 7, 1996, a Public Hearing was conducted by the City Council, upon Notice to the public,
to hear the appeal of Harold D. Kimmel concerning a decision of the Planning Commission. The
decision appealed from was made by the Planning Commission on April 8, 1996, and involved the
granting of a variance and special use permit for a proposal for the construction of a residential housing
project. The special use permit was required because, pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance, a special
use permit is required for residential uses in the central business district. Further, a 20 foot variance to
the height restrictions of the zoning district is required, which allows for 50 foot high structures and a
70 foot structure was proposed.
The Planning Commission approved both the special use permit and the variance. Thereafter,
on April 16, 1996, within the time provided by law, Harold D. Kimmel filed an appeal under the
provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance, requesting that the Planning Commission's decision be
overturned.
Thereafter, after due notice, as required by law, the City Council conducted a public hearing.
At the hearing, which was held de novo, the City Council considered evidence and listened to persons
who spoke in favor of and in opposition to the appeal.
Based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, the City Council of the City of Stillwater does
here make the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order:
1
.
.
.
1.
FINDINGS OF FACT
This appeal is properly before the City Council pursuant to provisions of the Stillwater
City Code.
2. That the real estate that is the subject matter of this appeal contains approximately 63,485
square feet and is legally described as part of Lot 6, Block 35, of the original Town now City of
Stillwater. Since February 12, 1996, the property has been owned by the City of Stillwater, acquired
pursuant to an Agreement for the exchange of real property and municipal industrial development made
between the City and Lanoga Corporation, a Delaware corporation, 125 West Fifth Street, Winona,
Minnesota 55987-5550 and Northern States Power Company, 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota
5540 1.
3. That prior to the acquisition of the property by the City, it was found that part of the site
contained hazardous wastes. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) completed for the property
indicated that the property was formerly occupied by the Stillwater Gas and Electric Company from
approximately 1887 to 1910, at which time it was purchased by Bluff City Lumber and Consumers Light
and Power Company. Northern States Power Company purchased the site in approximately 1924 and
it was later acquired by Lanoga Corporation in 1972. While occupied by Stillwater Gas and Electric
Light Company, predecessors to Northern States Power Company, this site was used as a coal gasication
plant. When the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment revealed contamination, A TEC Associates, Inc.
was hired by the City of Stillwater and completed a Phase IT Environment Site Assessment at the site and
found polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the soil and ground water samples collected.
Napholean, tluoranthene and benzine concentrations were detected in a down graded radiant monitoring
welded exceeded the Minnesota Department of Health recommended allowable limits. The Minnesota
Pollution Control agency thereafter designated the site as Gas Manufacturing Site No. 1. Further, the
2
e
.
.
United States Environmental Protection Agency completed a preliminary assessment and a site inspection
report and the property was scored on the federal hazard ranking system.
4. Before acquisition by the City and in contemplation of its acquisition by the City, the site
was enrolled in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Voluntary Investigation and Clean Up program
and a second addendum to Phase n Remedial Investigation Work Plan for the Former Manufacturing Gas
Plan dated March 9, 1995, was accepted by the Pollution Control Agency for enrollment in a site
remediation program that is ongoing.
5. That the applicants for the special use permit and variance had standing to request the
special use permit and the variance in view of their proposal to purchase the property from the City of
Stillwater for approximately $600,000.00, subject to the ongoing remediation program undertaken by
Northern States Power Company and approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, provided that
the applicants could be granted the variance and the special use permit necessary for the construction of
their proposed project.
6. The property is located at the foot of a steep hill. Surrounding the site to the south is the
SuperValu owned parking lot provided for the Cub headquarters building at an elevation of 807 feet. To
the west is the right-of-way of Third Street. The Third Street elevation adjacent to the property is 790
feet near the driveway to the Cub parking lot entrance and on the low side it is 760 feet near the
intersection with Olive Street. To the east of the site is the former UBC retail store and Grand Garage
parking lot and the Gordon and Iron Metal Works is located to the southeast.
7. The site is vacant, having had the sheds housing the former lumber yard tom off the
property .
8.
The property contains monitoring wells necessary for the ongoing remediation being
conducted by Northern States Power.
3
e
.
.
9. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City found that existing vacant sites in the downtown
portion of the City were appropriate locations of infill housing and the Plan identifies the property as a
location appropriate for infill multi-family housing.
10. The livable communities program of the Metropolitan Council also sets a goal for the City
to provide adequate attached housing and this property is one of few sites in the City that could
accommodate multi-family housing.
11. The site is serviced by City water, sewer and storm sewer and a major sanitary sewer line
runs through the site. Water service is available from Third Street.
12. That the applicants have indicated a willingness to work with the City Engineer to
minimize storm sewer run-off and to work with the Fire Chief to meet fire and building code
requirements .
13. The traffic engineer for the City reviewed the project plans that provides two parking
spaces for each guest unit and concluded that the system has adequate capacity to accommodate trips
generated to the project.
14. The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed the project at its meetings on February
5, March 8 and April 1, 1996, and at its April 1st meeting, the Heritage Preservation Commission
approved the project with conditions of approval regarding signage, lighting, landscaping materials, color
and roof treatment.
15. That the Heritage Preservation Commission determined that the development concept
followed the design guidelines developed for the site for pedestrian orientation, set back proportion and
height, materials and finish. 16. The Heritage Preservation Commission concluded that the desi~, materials and color
selection could further break-up and reduce the appearance of the development.
4
e
.
.
17. That a residential use is compatible with the neighborhood since other uses along Third
Street are residential and both the Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan indicates the
appropriateness of the site for residential use.
18. That the site is unique in view of the slope of the site which contains elevation changes
of at least 30 feet, is set back from adjacent structures and the street and the side and rear yards are next
to steeply sloped, treed lands.
19. That the additional height of 20 feet requested by the applicants was proposed by the
designed review suggestions of the Heritage Preservation Committee so that the side of the proposed
building facing Second Street on the East would be approximately the same height as adjacent structures
and the units displaced by lower building on the front would be added to the west elevation of the
proposed building in a way that would fit along the steep slopes but yet allow only one story elevation
above the right-of-way of Third Street on the east.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
1. That the proposed housing project as proposed conforms to the requirements and the
intent of the central business district zoning regulations, the Stillwater Downtown Plan and the City of
Stillwater Comprehensive Plan.
2. That the conditions of approval that have been made a part of the approval by the
Planning Commission to protect the neighborhood and the public and ensure conformity to the City Park
Dedication Policy, the Parking Policy and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. That the project will not be injurious to the neighborhood nor will it constitute a nuisance
nor will it be detrimental to the neighborhood or the public welfare of the community.
5
, ,
e
.
.
VARIANCE
1. The typography of the site and the conditions unique to the site, the steeply sloped areas
of the site, the vegetative conditions of the site, the hazardous wastes being remediated from the site and
the need for ongoing access for monitoring wells create a hardship for the development of the site.
2. That the unique characteristics of the site are a hardship that is not created by the
applicant and constitute a hardship within the meaning of Minnesota Statute ~462.357, Subd. 6(2).
3. That the granting of a variance would not alter the existential character of the locality.
4. That the granting of a height variance will permit relief from the strict application of the
height limitations in the code and prevent or mitigate undue non-economic hardship in relation to the use
of the land.
5. That approval of the height variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the City
Ordinance since it is consistent with the Downtown Plan and the Comprehensive Plan and the refusal to
grant the variance would constitute undue hardship with regard to the development of the land.
ORDER
The City Council of the City of Stillwater pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 462 and the Zoning Ordinance found in Chapter 38 of the Stillwater City Code does hereby order
that the special use permit and variance granted by the City Council on April 8, 1996, together with all
conditions of approval imposed thereby be approved and sustained and the appeal be denied.
Dated at Stillwater, Minnesota this 21st day of May, 1996.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Morli Weldon, Clerk
6
{ .
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
e FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director ~
DA: May 17, 1996
RE: UPDATE ON SALE OF USC PROPERTY, PURCHASE OF TERRITORIAL PRISON PROPERTY
AND CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING STRUCTURE
UBC Land Sale
Since the Council meeting of May 7, 1996, where staff was directed to continue negotiation the sale of the
UBC site, staff has met with the developer to discuss the project and terms of the sale. The developer's offer
to purchase is attached. The offer to purchase currently includes the developer paying the in-lieu park
dedication fee of $32,500 and being responsible for all utility line relocation or extension costs, estimated at
$40,00-$50,000.
In response to concerns for the intensity of site development, the project has been downsized to 65 units.
This requires some design modifications and additional review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. The
special use permit for the residential use and variance to height would still be in effect for the modified 65-unit
project. Because the US West property is no longer a part of the project, conditions of approval 1, 2, and 4
can be eliminated and condition 3 changed from 175 to 140 parking spaces (a new set of conditions of
approval is attached). With these design changes, the developer has offered $600,000 for the site, subject to
environmental clearance and clear title. The date of closing is 120 days from today's meeting or September
21, 1996. It is recommended that if the council wants to sell the property for the project that this is an
acceptable price. A map showing the property the city owns and is a part of the sale is attached.
Territorial Prison Site
If the City sells the UBC property, staff recommends the CQuncil provide direction for the staff to work with
Maple Island Inc. and the Territorial Prison Coalition to determine terms of City purchase of the territorial
prison site, terms of land lease and payback public use and shared parking.
The property was previously optioned by the Territorial Prison Coalition from Maple Island Inc. for a purchase
price of $880,000. Timing of sale/purchase and development is also critical to the purchase.
:,
Parking Structure
At the May 7, 1996, meeting, staff was directed to begin putting in place the Bluff City Tax Increment District.
Proceeds from the district would be adequate to pay for a parking structure at Olive and Second Street. The
structure could be constructed as early as Fall 1997 dependent on development occurring on the UBC site.
Temporary parking on the UBC site will remain available until the housing project begins construction,
estimated as Fall 1996.
Recommendation:
1.
e2.
Direction to sell UBC site to developer - staff to prepare draft sales agreement.
Direction to discuss purchase of Territorial Prison site with Maple Island Inc. and Territorial Prison
Coalition and to come back to council at the June 4, 1996, meeting with terms of purchase.
Attachment: Letter from Peter Gerrard, 5-16-96
#~~
GeRRARD
REALlY
.
\
.
.e
GERRARD REALTY CORP · 420 SOUTH 5TH STREET. P.O. BOX 1086 · LA CROSSE. WISCONSIN 54602-1086
PHONE 608/782-4488. FAX 608/782-4478
May 16th, 1996
City of Stillwater
ATIN: Stephen Russell- Community Development Director
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Gerrard Condominium Project
(The Bluffs of Stillwater)
Dear Steve:
In anticipation of the May 21 st City Council meeting, I thought it would be helpful
for me to explain in writing our proposal with regard to the terms of purchase of
the UBC site from the City. As you are aware, over the past several weeks we have
been attempting to configure the project with lower density (i.e., fewer units) in
conjunction with eliminating the U.S. West property as part of the overall project.
The project will now consist of approximately 65 units which we hope will be
viewed favorably by the members of the Council, who have in the past expressed a
concern with the size of the project. As a restllt of this reduction in the number of
units that will be available for sale, it was necessary for us to carefully evaluate the
amount we could pay for the land (including purchase price, park fees and
sewer/water improvements).
0(
In light of the foregoing, we propose that the City give us the right to purchase the
UBC site upon the following terms and conditions:
1) the price will be $600,000;
2) $500/unit park fees will be paid to the CitYj
3) we will be responsible for the cost and installation of the sewer/water
improvementsj
4)
the closing will occur within 120 days, subject to the project going
forward (i.e., we do not expect the City to sell us the land if we are
unable to do the condominium project)j
.
5) the project will incorporate 140 parking stallsj
(
e~
e
,
Stephen Russell...
page -2-
6) included in the purchase price will be the sloped City land
immediately adjacent to the project site on the west side; and
7) paragraphs I, 2, 3, 4 and 10 of the Planning Commission report dated
April 8th, 1996 must be addressed to make them consistent with the
~ project as now contemplated.
We look forward to receiving approval from the City Council this coming Tuesday
of the terms and conditions set forth above. We have previously indicated to you
that Gerrard Realty Corp will have to abandon its efforts to develop The Bluffs of
Stillwater if Council approval is not forthcoming. Thank you very much for your
efforts on behalf of the City in moving this project forward.
, .)
New Conditions of Approval from City Council Meeting of 5-121-96
Case No. SUPN/96-15
e
1. A minimum of 140 parking spaces shall be provided in the parking structure )2/DU
residential, 130, plus 10 guest spaces).
2. Two parking spaces shall be provided for each residential unit (parking shall come with
unit an not be provided separately).
3. Cost for installation or relocation of the sanitary sewer and water line shall be paid by the
developer.
4. All fire protection concerns of the fire chief shall be addressed and approved by the Fire
Chief before building permits are issued.
5. Storm water run off rates shall be reduced through project design as approved by the city
engineer.
6. Exhibit "A" shall be the bases of design and building height approval as modified 5-21-96.
7. The treed sloped areas shall be protected from development impact.
8. The city of Stillwater shall have assurances that 125 additional public parking1 spaces
shall be constructed in a ramp over the Olive and Second Street lot.
9. The conditions of approval regarding landscape plan, lighting plan, signage, building
materials and material colors from the Heritage Preservation Commission shall be meet
before building permits are issued (DR/96-29).
10. A detailed grading, drainage/erosion control plan shall be approved by the city engineer ;;
before a building permit will be issued.
11. Park Dedication fees shall be paid for the project based on the new Park Dedication
Policy, $32,500.
12. There shall be no general resident access to roof areas.
13. The building design modification resulting from the reduction in units to 65 and changes
in the Olive Street elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Heritage Preservation
Commission before a building permit is issued.
14. The city owned lot off of Third Street shall be maintained in a natural condition with no
development and available to the city for public utility uses only.
.
1This shall be a City of Stillwater responsibility.
...::.: l
. .
,:\.
.....
::.:-. -
. I
.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
DARKETT M. STACK
STILLWATER, MINN. SS082
MINIUSOT^ RECISTERED
UND SURVEYOR
Tel. No. 439-S630
UNITED nUILDING CENTER, a.k.a. Laird Norton Co..
301 South Second St., Stillwater, KN 55082
SU'H'~:y MA,n: ~:XCLUSIVEI.Y !'Oll,
Per Pnrcel Description Furnished:
(see Sheet 3 of 3 Sheets)
1
/-"So,
/ll-:SC:lllI'TION:
NOTES:
Orientation of this bearing system is assumed.
o Indicates 5/6" 1.0. iron pipe set m~rked with n plastic plug inscribed RLS 13774.
Underground or overhead public or private utilities on or adjacent the parcel were not
located in conjunction with this survey. unless noted otherwise_
Outside boundary was surveyed per parcel description furnished (see sheet 3 of 3 sheets).
Adjoining parcel descriptions were not researched or compared with desc. furnished.
Note fence line and bituminous pavement encroachment along the n'ly line.
Contact the City of Stillwater Public Works Dept. at 439-6121 for field staking and exact
lac. of remainder of 40" San Sewer line lac. on this parcel. Exact lac. presently unknown.
This sewer line is not defined by easement.
H JV' ,-:.c
,~. 35 __ S7Z-;r'f$".v
'-..... ,--
-I .
~ I I
~ ~"'Goo \ A
~~,~
~.I. . - #.';:~ ---;
.. . I>
," I '/;}:.19'lrw I
~ ~
~ ~
~ . ~
~ ~
'i
....
'.:.
.';
:.....
" .::
..
.....
" .
'.
....
.,:.'
..>~f .
.' ::f":
. '::';:",
....,.
,'::;.::
::.',
.~::"N.
,.:."
.........
.....:..
.:-:....:.
I.,:..:J
I:";-~
" 0'
.....:-:.
,'. '.~-.
..
. :.~ .
e
..
.. .,'
~
k:
\I)
..'"!
..
I
i ~
I ~
I
~ <:l
\ "
~
,
I
4.6'5
~
,,}
I
I
L,I
~
'-it( '*15.
- ~ ft
I H.N"",,. ~ r--"'I
. ~~Sh;:'
IlU'6 L
"
~
!
o
, ~
\ :t
, hereby certify that this survey. plan. "r ",).1..,
prepared by me or under my dirccI slIl'cf\.i,i.." all.llhal
I am a duly Ilegistcred land Surve}'"r unller II... 1.\\\ "I
Ih~4;1,~
EAST
OLIVE
S7,eEE T
~
J~J. / I --
#$ c..~.
__ __,I tJ~. 35
/
.",' -'.,c
$I"'"
f)LYS"LtJ'p~ P /lIrA . ~,-
;/UHllr === === ~
Hr'S. /1"."1 ..- .#7Z'U".,.,..1aJ '1#.5# -
JIlIN. '" y...a.
\3- 6..,
,..H':..----
~
~~~,_22_L
1 2/ L9~.
,:',','';. ;1"; :,~,"~-:'r.v
L..--- --- -
...?/-- .::5 ;..../40_ ;"/,4 ;r.:rA:
35
8
Ope. 4-/6 tJ1-9
..
"
...
..
...
k
~
~
~
C)~
,.,
~
I
\
\
I
~IS"1/
.. Ihury
'"
I
I
\
,
..
,
~
Ii
~
~
V)
tIJ
Date Sept 11 1 qq, Itcg.Nu 1 J 7 71
.........
.........
... ~ ".:. ".:.:.
. ;~~)\:.:
,",:.",::.::":"
.......:
. ,';~:,'.:
: ,.;.::::::
.... ,",
:"::::,", ,"
":",:-;:.
. ......
.," ......
". ......
"."-:.'.;'
::Y?:;:.
:.;,.:.
......:
......:..:
~::::.;..: :': -
.'.~~'~.;~~:~/'
,', .....
. ,.-.",:.:.
. ...:
"
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council ~~
FROM: Diane Deblon, Finance Director
DATE: May 20, 1996
SUBJECT: Update on City-Owned U.B.C. Site
The City Council has previously directed staff to proceed with the development of a new TIF
district in conjunction with the development of the city's UBC land site by Gerard Realty.
With the creation of this new district and the proposed housing development, the city will realize
significant TlF revenues to be used for various parking improvements in the downtown. The
earliest construction of a parking structure would possibly be in 1998, rather than 1997 as
indicated by Mr. Russell. lfthe housing project begins construction in 1996, the value on 1-1-97
will be a partial valuation and the 1 st year of TIF generated will be for payable 1998. At that
time, revenues will be reviewed to determine whether they are sufficient for the debt service on a
bond sale to fmance a parking structure.
e
e
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FR:
City Coordinator
RE:
Yacht Club Lease agreements
DA: May 3, 1996
~ Sj.:LJ/q/p
Discussion:
I have met with Dan Hawks, manager of the Stillwater yacht club to discuss the parking
situation at Mulberry Point. Dan appeared to be very willing to cooperate with the City in
helping to keep the Point area free of boat trailers or at least parked in a more orderly
manner. However, Dan was concerned about the availability of parking for the
vehicles/trailers if the Point was signed for no parking. Dan suggested that this year will
be different because the previous owners did not attempt to control the parking at the
point and Dan said that, as the manager of the Yacht Club, he would closely monitor
and control the launching/parking. He requested that the City allow parking at the Point
this year and see if the conditions are more acceptable. Dan did not have any
objections for prohibiting parking in some areas (such as along the levee road) or to
keep some space open at the Point for boaters who want to tie up along the shore for a
short period of time. Further, Dan said that he would direct as many boaters as possible
to the other parking areas (at least until the other areas became full).
One of the problems associated with the launch and parking situation is the lack of '
parking in the area. The Maple Island parking lot (the gravel lot to the East of the former
creamery) would be a good area to park vehicles/trailers except that: it would require
the operator to drive back to Myrtle Street (which tends to be a congested area); the lot
is gravel and markings to control the parking would be difficult; the lot would not
accommodate more than 10-15 vehicles/trailers; and the lot would probably have to be
designated for vehicle/trailer parking only.
,-
,
The Municipal lot adjacent to the Zephyr could also be used. However, the length of the
vehicles/trailers (35 to 40+feet) would take up quite a few spaces (and the traffic
concerns expressed above regarding Myrtle Street also applies to this lot).
It was agreed that the parking and traffic situation would be less of a problem if
Mulberry Street was extended to provide access to the launch area (and in turn better
egress and route to other parking lots). I think we could provide this access at a cost of
about $2000 if we can get the necessary approvals. I am working on the process to
obtain approval but will not have that info for you at the meeting Tuesday.
At this time I am not sure what the City should do except consider designating the
Maple Island lot for trailer parking only and to try to obtain a direct access by extending e
Mulberry Point to the launch area. The City could consider requiring no-parking at the
Point. However, given the anticipated activity for this year I am not sure if this should be
done. If the parking cannot take place at the Point people will merely attempt to find
other areas to park and this may become more of a problem than that which already
exists.
Recommendation:
Council establish a parking policy for boat trailers at Mulberry Point. I would further
recommend that the lease agreements be approved of as written and that the City
continue to work with the yacht club to resolve the parking problems.
/}f~
;;
\
e
r
[ . .-\
e
MEMORANDUM
.\ U: Mayor and Council
FR.OM: City coordinator
~IJ!3JECT: Lease rcncwal- Stillwatcr Ytlcht Club
L"!~:\ TE:
~ ~/q'if.,
fv\~ al
.'
Discussj':m: "'
Accompanying this memo is a copy of the leases (# 099971 and # 249934) issued to Stillwater Yacht
Club in 1995. The lease agreements have been in existence for many years and should be renewed for
1996. The only change that the Council may want to consider is the change in the fees.
..,
I can discuss this more full)! with you at the meeting Tuesday.
Recommendation:
Council approve lease renewal for Stillwater Y ncht CWb.
L.
"
#p
e
LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT
January 1, 1995 - December 31, 1995
Stillwater Yacht Club, Inc.
~22 East Mulbe=ry Street
P.O. Box 231
Stillwater, MN 55082
R~: Lease #099971, Dated the 28th of August, 1968, By and Between the
City of Stillwater and Muller Boat Wo~ks, Inc., t~e interest of
Muller Boat Works now the property of Stillwater Yacht Club.
WHEREAS, the Landlord is willing to ~~ant an exce~sion for t~e
Fe~iod January 1, 1995, through December 3l, 1995, upc~ payment of
re~t in the sum of $2,750.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Lease, together with all benefits and obligations,
be extended for the period January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1995.
2. That rent for the period in the amount of $2,750.00 shall be
paid by the Lessee before this extension becomes effective.
The parties hereto have duly executed this Extension Agreement
this /{li..day Of~ 1995.
LESSOR
LE~SEE
STI~LWATE~HT CLUB , INC.
By r~ ""!...s--~..y7/J
o
rts ct5~
By
J..TTEST:
~l / {, )JJJ~
M6rli Weldon, City Clerk
(
f,
e
,-
,
e
~
v
~.
~
~
u
..
..
~
<<:1
"::1
~~
.\- '"
:x: ~
...,<(
0<
rQ)
rL.~
'lU:i..
\- \..
<t: ~
):n..
..J
...J
~
~
C)
<)
'-::r \f\
f<lr<)
ClU
..,-
.;y
\~
'\l-
'C"
."
~z
(
---'-I--~
..- ,
~.P'lptt\...;~..~~ 1
I ~.sl._
. 1" -U!Q-" .
.,.-.--.........-- ------..~, .--
.. . '
I
,\
I l'nrtd
C -FL-
--n~ ",,,,,11t'C"'
...,---
--._ ~~:.._,~B[~- jU~-~
r '1""L.r. )ow.'~"" .... , . l ~f; - -
___--'-----'- ..._ ._-..-,---0,--1'07\-;;;9 -
. w L "11>>'-f \P .~ 0 I ~/-"'"
_ .,. ..; I) Lo I - J ' .'
" l' ---
.~-g::,.:- _..;;:: r{~l:;:; -.~ -r.;
~.~ -.~\ ~ . I;~
L'UIUJ. . 0', "
1./ ;:
I,~'
-
.;
L' ,,'
~[
~C;;
N:':: E
,..... ~
...::?
.,.. .'
~~t')
. ..... to
....u...
I~-
---4;;;;i.
'of
:.s -."
r-;
Loll
2"e.
rr5G'
I
I
EXHI91T . A'
BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAu..ROAD COMPAl
;, ....
'.
. .".:.-;-;_ --- r ,:r
. . I,
H/// waft:.;-
cITY
CONTANfiG [1.:? 'f0 SQ. n. MonE OR lESS
f
I!Jtf j" h /n q /r:; /1 L
CO\JlITY I' SIAl
,/1_ I '
)./.}J'''' SCALE.: L-=..f~- DATf
'. .' (,' - ;:> I
DIV,SlOlt.,.LtllLt- {;I1I:r [/1l;T/U.ll ,,,,.,1.1111::1
: .
..
.. ,-.
:.1 ..';"
\.\OTl ') n"
c....
."
".
..;, :~? .
~
f"
"0
~ .
. .
..:.
:~.
" ._-
.. ~
o
1\
___0-
.,"
... ...... :
e
LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT
e
January 1, 1995 - December 31, 1995
Stillwater Yacht Club, Inc.
422 East Mulberry Street
P.O. Box 231
St~llwater, MN 55082
R~: Lease #249,934 Dated June 1, 1986, By and Between Glacier Pa~k
Company as Lessor and Stillwater Yacht Club, Inc. As Lessee, the
interest of Glacier Park Company assigned to the City of
Stillwater, a Municipal Corporation on the 27th of June, 1991.
WHEREAS, the Landlord is willing to grant an extension for the
period January I, 1995, through December 31, 1995, upon payment of
rent in the sum of $3,500.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the Lease, together with all benefits and obligations,
be extended for the period January I, 1995, through December 31, 1995.
2. That rent for the period in the amount of $3,500.00 shall be
paid by the Lessee before this extension becomes effective.
The parties hereto have duly executed this Extension Agreement
this lfU-day of ~1995.
LESSOR
LESSEE
STILLWAT~R YACHT~ INC. .
By rr I ~
Its (h~
\.
By
P.TTEST:
(fJ~ V ~
M 11 Weldon, C1ty Clerk
e
r
.
MEMORANDUM
e
TO:
Mayor and Council
FR:
City Coordinator
RE:
Request for Lease of Mullberry Point
DA:
May 17, 1996
Discussion:
Accompanying this memo is a request from Croix Holding Co. to lease Mulberry Point.
Although the request does not state the specific reasons for wanting to lease the property it is my
understanding that it would be used as a pick-up spot for the passengers of the Lady Chateau and
perhaps some other charter vessels. The agenda also includes the lease renewal for the Stillwater
Yacht Club. This request should probably be discussed at the same time as the Yacht Club lease
renewal. However, I would recommend that the Council deny the Croix Holding Co. request for
the following reasons:
1) The Stillwater Yacht Club has been leasing the property for a number of years and they
fully expect to lease the property again this year. I think the City would subjected to a
lawsuit if the lease is not renewed. At least for this year anyway (I think it would
require a more timely notice if the City were to not renew the yacht club Lease);
2) Croix Holding Co. proposes to close the laUnch area which would anger many of the
local citizens who use the launch during the summer (as well as other users). I have
had discussions with manager of the Yacht Club and they intend to provide boat
launching services this year (and as I have stated in another memo they will try to
control the parking of boat trailers in the Point area);
3) It is my understanding that the real purpose of the request is to provide a pick-up spot
for the Lady Chateau passengers/clientele. Apparently the Yacht Club and the Lady
Chateau operators have been unable to reach an agreement for the use of the Yacht
Club docks and they are now looking for another pick-up point. Mulberry Point would
be used as the pick-up point and the parking lot (which is now used primarily by
P.D.Pappys customers) would be used for the Lady Chateau customers. I think. this
could present an obvious problem for parking in this area.
The City attorney will advise you more fully on this matter at the meeting.
e Recommendation:
Deny the request of Croix Holding Co to lease Mullberry Point and renew lease with Yacht Club.
~~
TO:CITY OF STILLWATER
FROM:CROIX HOLDING CO.
SUBJECT:OFFER TO LEASE MULBERRY POINT.
DEAR NILES,
AS PER OUR CONVERSATION, THE OWNERS OF THE LADY CHATUE AND MYSELF
WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN AN OFFER TO LEASE MULBERRY POINT. WE WOULD
CLOSE THE BOAT LAUNCH AND WOULD STILL OFFER FREE PARKING. I BELIEVE
THE CITY IS CURRENTLY LEASING IT FOR $3,500. WE WOULD BE WILLING TO
OFFER $10,000 AND OUTSIDE OF CLOSING THE BOAT LAUNCH NOTHING ELSE
WOULD CHANGE. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME AND I'LL BE IN TOUCH.
SINCERELY,
I~ Jd. do~
..
e
,.
,
.
I
.
e'
DATE: May 15. 1996
MEMO TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Allen O. zepperLtl't(
RE:
Plumbing and Mechanical Fees
The present plumbing and mechanical fees have been at the present rate since approximately
1985. The problem we are having is not the fees rate itself but the fact that we have no minimum
fee listed. Presently, if a person comes in for a permit to install a bathroom with a stool, lav and
shower, it is a $15.00 permit. ($ 5.00 per plumbing opening.) The same is true for the
mechanical fee schedule. If a person installs a gas fireplace, water heater or changes over from
oil he<rt to gas etc., it is a $15.00 permit.
I do not have concerns over the present rates except I would like the council to consider
amending the fee schedules to include the establishment of a $ 35.00 MINIMUM FEE for both
the Mechanical and the Plumbing fee schedules. The present $15.00 fee does not even cover the
cost of writing the permit, besides paying for the cost of going out and making an inspection,
and in the plumbing case, two inspections. This is not in addition to the present schedule, rather
a minimum to help of set our costs incurred.
Thank You
.
..
.
~
GC/ 5J~/J7b
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM
. ...
LICENSED IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING
333 NORTH MAIN STREET' SUITE #202 . P.O, Box 438 . STILLWATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE: (612) 439-9464. TELECOPIER: (612) 439-5641
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator; Steve Russell, Community Development Director; Sue
Fitzgerald, Assistant Community Development Director; Allen Zepper, Building Official;
Leo Miller, Stillwater Police Department; Cindy Jacobson, Animal Control Officer
David T. Magnuson, City Attorney iJf\'V\
May 20, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Kennel Nuisance
I enclose for the information of the Council, a copy of a Complaint recently filed with the Washington
County Court charging an individual with operating a dog kennel as a nuisance. Presently this individual
holds a kennel license and the purpose of this memorandum is to request that the City Council give notice
to this person and schedule a hearing at the next regular Council Meeting for the revocation of this kennel
license. At the hearing, we will present evidence collected by the police department over a significant
period of time along with statements from offended neighbors, as well as photographs of the offending
conditions. If the Council sees fit to schedule such a hearing, we will give proper notice to the owner
as is required by law.
DTM/ds
Enclosure
. )" .\IIinnesota County of Washington District Court
.-~_JiLWi..J.fJ._.i14~~_.j~~ilii.~~~_.~m
CHARGE STATUTE ONLY M.O,C. GOC CTY. ATTY, CONTROLLING CONTROL NO.
. FILE NO. AGENCY
tillwater Ordinance Chap. 38.01 N3070 N MN0820600 96202638
.
COURT CASE NO. DATE FILED
..."'" .... .......-....'...-., ....
. ."...,' .....,... - - .. .,.
....'........... ", ... -...
.................'......','.. '.....'.-... ....-'...
.....--' ,.............-...'. -. '-'
"', .-......., ....,-- .... ....
. .",' '.............-.-... .........
. - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........
.........--...."..'. .'.. ... .
.....-........'........... ".
..L......__.._....... ...
bAmended
..... . ....,........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . , .
....... ',- ,.. .......
.., .. .........'....
...........-.-,........
...................".....
". .....-. ........
.......'.....-.....-..-..
'-' . " " -......
o Hfab.tharge Previously Filed
o if more than 6 counts (see attached) 0 if domestic assault
COMPLAINT SUMMONS
PROS ATTY PH: 612-439-9464
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PLAINTIFF,
MISDEMEANOR
VS.
NAME: first. middle. last
Nancy Lucia Canning
SJIS COMPLAINT NUMBER
82-11-1-028167
-~...""'..,
.,. . .'.',. -:.....:::::-::::.... ."':-
.. " . .u...... 'OY ','
DEFENDANT.
WASHINGTON CTY
. ..;:.
.. ",
COMPLAINT
The Complainant, being duly swom, makes complaint to the abovl#-named Court and states that there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant.
committed the following offense's}. The Complainant states that the following facts establish PROBABLE CAUSE:
~t the defendant, Nancy Canning, has been operating a dog kennel out of her residence at 717 South Second Street in
of Stillwater. The defendant's neighbors have reported to the Stillwater Police that the defendant has been breeding,
b g, keeping, and offering for sale, Giant Schnauzers on their property at 717 South Second Street. It has been reported
that as many as nine to fifteen dogs have been known to be boarded and kept on the property at anyone time. After the
puppies are all sold, as many as four to five adult dogs remain on the property.
The defendant has maintained her kennel in such a way as to constitute a public nuisance under Stillwater Ordinance 38.01,
Subd. 12(1) and Subd. 13. Subd. 2(2) of the Ordinance provides that a nuisance shall include "any substance, matter, emission
or thing which creates a dangerous or unhealthy condition or which threatens the public peace, health, safety or sanitary
condition of the city or which is offensive or has a blighting influence on the community". Subd. 2(2)(h) of the Ordinance
further provides that animal feces must be disposed of in a clean and sanitary manner.
The defendant has not removed the dog feces from her yard. The dogs are allowed out of the kennel into the back yard
of the property. Over the course of several months dog feces has accumulated and none of it has been removed or disposed
I of. The feces has putrefied and has become part of the ground. The property has been visually inspected by Officer Leo Miller
I and by Community Service Officer Cindy Jacobson of the Stillwater Police Department and they discovered the back yard
portion of the property to be covered with dog feces. The feces was observed to be decaying and much of it was covered with
mold and mildew. The officers also found the odors of feces and urine to be oppressive, even when standing on adjacent
property.
The presence of dog feces on the property has created an unhealthy condition which threatens the health and sanitary
condition of the neighborhood. The odors coming from the property are persistent and offensive to neighbors. In addition
this condition has a blighting influence on the surrounding community.
.
FORM C
REV, 4/95
'\ ...#
j
'~,~
~j
STILLWATER
AREA SCHOOLS
IIu!I
Effective Learning Through Excellence in Education
1875 SOUTH GREELEY STREET
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
351-8340 · V-TDD 351-8338
May 20, 1996
Mr. Nile Kriesel
City Administrator
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: Request for Feasibility Study
Dear Mr. Kriesel:
.
This letter is a request that the City conduct a feasible study on behalf of the School
District relative to the district obtaining utility services at its Stillwater township site.
Specifically, this study should review the availability of sewer and water, both source
and estimated cost, if construction were to take place without City annexation.
It is understood thatthe cost of this study would be the responsibility of the District.
Based on our conversation, it is my understanding that this request could be considered
at the Council's Tuesday, May 21, 1996 meeting.
Thanks for your assistance.
Sincerely,
~Q~~
Daniel C. Parker
Business Manager
DCP bc
An Equal Opportunity Employer
DAVID WETTERGREN
.erintendent
MARV SWANSON
Director
Personnel Services
MARY JO WEINGARTEN
Deputy Superintendent
K-12 Education
CLAUDIA L. RISNES
Director
Curriculum & Instruction
DANIEL C. PARKER
Business Manager
DON J. LOE
Director
Special Services
MARY LOU GORSKI
Director
Community Education & Recreation
f
C. MAY-21-1996 14: 58
I
.
'.
.'
SCHERER BROS.
Contractor Property Developers Company
Tuesday, May 21, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
612 627 0838 P.02/02
SUBJECT: Stonn WaterlUtility Issues 'for the Newman Realty Property
.As the option holder of the Newman Realty property"we respectfully request that the City
undertake, ,on a joint basis with landowners and the school district, the commencement of
and Environmental Impact Statement and related storm water issues.
In addition" we request the.City to Commence a joint feasibility study relative to the cost
and timing of streets and utilities to. service the future annexation area .and school site on
the Newman Realty property.
Your consideration of this request at your City Council meeting tonight would be
appreciated. '
Sincerely;
CONTRACTOR PROPERTY DEVELOPERS COMPANY and CHARLES C. cuon
COMPANY
4d~~'
Homer H. Tomplcins~ m
General Manager
Contractor Property Developers Company
HHTlkc
9110 831.d AVt1Zt4e No,'th,
8.ro()k~"I'11 Park, lviN 55445
627-0823 · Fax 627-0879
.'
....r:.."'=:: ~ :,?
1215-21-1996 14:35
612 731 4869
CHARLES CUDD CO.
. . . . .:' ,'.", '. .
: <,!:\:'::"",y(,~~:~,: \", . ", :. "', . " " ~":' ':' . " , .' .'
",'. '. "
\ ' ,
, . ~.. .
I,"
.. ~" . .
.. .. ','..', '" :"
. .: . '. ~ ,
. . '''/' ,~'~'\,.': ',~";":', 'I~.;' 'j' ~,,':.
. '
, "'\,
. . .':' <~...~ o'
j .... l" . ~
:.: <~ ':: i~,j
\ \:~. f
'.., . ."',
, ,~' '.:<;,\
"
. " .~. ~, ." . '. " ~ . I..
'. \,':" ,- :
. " ~,
I ... ,_' I
,Unl~Y' of, Sit,'Plannlns, Arct\lfectur;1 Dcsi8n,'" Construction, .
I .... t" ,
.
.. '
. ' , ,\' ,,' ..
. 100e, WClODD^LE:.... ORIVE:...
WC)C~DE:lURY, "MN '551~5
'~ ..' I .
f' " '.
, "
.,:: '~,',. "
"', :'1 '.J .
", i
, .
.\ .
, ,
. -'{ . (
" ~
,\
", .
, ,
Tuesday, MaY,21, 1996
',~ .,":,
, ,~.
TO:
, '
Honorable. Mayor and'Clty Council ,Members
. " ,
,/
",
, , .
. SU~JECT: Storm Water/Utility' Issues for the Newman Realty Property
, '" ' .
,t I .
. '. I . . , '. '. " "" . · '~. .
. 'W~'~espeCtfUlly'request that 'the 'City undertake, on a Jolrifbasls with landowners and the: "
S911001 dist(ict. the commencement of an, Envlronmentallmpaot Statement' and a compr~';-:
, ' hensl~ study of related storm water Issu~'s., .', .'..:',. , . ,..~ "'''.;:'~':.;:,
'. ", ~ ."'~ '. , '.' '. ' .:", ,; , ..' " ~.. '. .., ,'.' \. ' ' . ' . ;' '. ' '.: ..:.-'.
'..: .In 'addition. we reque~~ t~e City tQ;'commeno,'a.j~irtt feasibility study relativS:to the C'~$~;:".
, a(\d)lming of ~freet~' and'utIJ,ltles 'lo'servlce the future ahn~xatlon 'area and S9boo,J site' on~';~
the,Newman Realty,property.' , ......,', .'/, . ,"'" " '::' ' , ...: .' ;."', .\:.
. "....... . ". .... " _, ",". ",' _"I...,' :",,,,:'i'~"~-
, ~irlg e~tered int<? an agr~emenf~vith c.PpC to fund.th'e'd~x.lopm~nt, (while the'Oha'Fles,',~',.
. .dd CP.' continues planning, design, and architeCtural control and buJldlng tasks) we; "
witry CPDC, request yOur ~onsideration of th. a.bo~ ,studies at your city Counoil meetl!19 . '
tonight. '. '. , ' .' '. " .' " , . . ., ': ' ....
I r" · .. . . ..... "
'. .1
,,'
, --;.
't ~..' ..' . .1 . .'
CHA~LES CUDD ~O...AND,~ONTR~C1l?R PROP~R:rX 9EVELOP~RS,C~MPANY ;.., >'
'. .
. ,
'. '
.' ,
. ,':
: '.
'.
'.
Marc Putman
V.R, Plannln~. ~ch.'
Charles Cuad Co.
.,
. .
. ~
, . '. .
,
, ,
MPltjp' ' ,
.. '
.
..' 1 .
. '
.. '
j
, ,.
"
, '.
.
'.
"
. '
,;
. oF'FICE:..., C61e) 7.::31-.::51=:S::::S
. . I'
',.r^>:<' " ,.' (61E) 7.:::31.~6ee
"
P.01
'\ .
" -\
. .
.
.
.
"'SeH
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL. MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT A TlON
May 16, 1996
Stillwater, Minnesota
1994 Street Improvements
City Project L.I. 296-300
SEH No. A-STILL3386.00 & A-STILL3390.00
cov~c;r..l.- Pt1~'S (UJ-:''0 LV(\0 J
RE:
L.- /,) f{\W\ /;::.vD
Q-e l.; ~ wAL- fA~Mt:N-Y ~
A \JtJfZo\lIWV '\ I
Dear Klayton:
Attached is Application for Payment No.7 and Final from Tower Asphalt for the 1994 Street
Improvements. This application is in the amount of $65,076.81. Also attached are copies of Lien
Waivers, Withholding Affidavit for Contractors (IC-134) and Consent of Surety Company to Final
Payment. We have reviewed the project with representatives from the City of Stillwater and have
found that the project conforms to the intent of the plans and specifications.
I would recommend that the City of Stillwater approve this Application for Payment No.7 and
Final in the amount of $65,076.81 from Tower Asphalt and accept the improvements for
maintenance. If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
'\S~c P J--
Barry C. Peters
Project Manager
tlo
Enclosures
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC.
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
MADISON, WI
LAKE COUNTY, IN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
ST CLOUD, MN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
RESOLUTION 96-
ACCEPTING WORK AND ORDERING FINAL PAYMENT
L.I. 296-300, 1994 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City on July 19, 1994,
Tower Asphalt, Inc., has satisfactorily completed the construction 1994 Street Improvements
in accordance with such contract,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER,
MINNESOTA. The work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved,
and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the city clerk and mayor are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract, taking the contractor's receipt in
full.
Adopted by the Council, this 21st day of May, 1996.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
, .
.
.
.
'A'.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
(UNIT PRICE CONTRACT)
e
NO.
I="lt-..IAL
OWNER:
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
OWNER'S PROJECT NO. L.I. 296-300
ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO.STILL3386-3390
LOCATION: STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTOR
TOWER ASPHALT, INC.
P.O. BOX 15001
LAKELAND, MINNESOTA 55043
1994 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
6--10 -9b
CONTRACT DATE
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$671 ,412.05
CONTR. FOR
APPLlC. DATE
PERIOD END.
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
CONTRACT QUANT. UNIT
DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANT. TO DATE PRICE TOTAL
NORTHLAND AVE. L.I. 296
. 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 0.2548 o. Z5Y8 40,000.00 $ '0.. In;J.CQ
2104.501 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER UN FT 680 QS.2.S- 1.00 $ r, ~:.d , S()
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. WALK SQYD 22 10L 1.00 $ lOZ..co
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CUYD 5465 5ll6S- 5.00 $ ;J "732 c;. () 0
2105.511 COMMON CHANNEL EXC. CUYD 100 100 7.00 $ 700.00
2105.522 SELECT GRAN. BORROW (LV) CUYD 3968 3530 5.00 $ /"lbSQ.OO
.
2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 14 ILl 15.00 $ 2.10 00
2105.523 COMMON BORROW CUYD 140 4.65 $
2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) CUYD 40 Z~ 9.00 $ 2Z$".00
2123.501 COMMON LABORER HR 16 30.00 $
2123.507. 1 CU YD SHOVEL HR 8 80.00 $
2123.509 DOZER HR 8 42.00 $
2123.510 10 CU YD TRUCK HR 8 55.00 $
2123.514 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADER HR 8 60.00 $
2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 10 (~ 25.00 $ 37 S-. 00
. 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 TON 3400 .3Z3C,. el 5.00.$ /blqC;.O~
PAGE 1 OF 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
.'
0231.606 BITUMINOUS SURFACE CRACK
& JOINT REPAIR, TYPE 1 L1N FT 1050 /8bL/ 1.00 $ 18(;,4.60
0231.606 BITUMINOUS SURFACE CRACK -
& JOINT REPAIR, TYPE 2 L1N FT 900 Illct 3.00 $ 31...5;7.00
2231.501 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIX. TON 55 1c;~.~S- 50.00 $ 77~t7. ~O
2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE SOYD 4486 3200 1.00 $ 32-00.00
2340.508 TYPE 41A WEAR COURSE MIX. TON 1814 / '1 58.40 23.75 $ L( /7bll ./L{
2340.512 TYPE 31 LEVELING COURSE MIX. TON 380 2b2- 23.75 $ "2-2-'2.- . QJ
2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIX. TON 1108 I23Z.7b 21.50 $ 2fSOY..3ll
2357.502 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 1248 lilt 1.00 $ C( n. 00
2502.541 4" PERF. P.E. PIPE DRAIN L1N FT 540 540 5.00 $ 2700.00
0502.601 P.V.C. YARD DRAIN BOX EACH 1 I 500.00 $ SOO.OO
0504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 11 C, 160.00 $ 14110.00
0504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP EACH 2 'Z- 100.00 $ ZOO, 0 U
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 36 32..- 200.00 $ (':,l(OQ.OO
2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CL-5 CYYD 25 ZS- 60.00 $ IS-OO.OO
2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE 4 SOYD 15 Ie;- 4.00 $ bO,OD
2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SOFT 550 ( I Lit 1.50 $ J1ZO.~O
0531.604 7" CONCRETE CROSS-GUTTER SOYD 170 ZOO 25.00 $ 5000.00 .
0531.603 MUDJACK CONC. CURB & GUT. L1N FT 120 to 5.00 $ 3$0. 00
2531.501 CONC. CURB & GUTTER,
DESIGN D412 L1N FT 680 C; S-2. S- 5.00 $ LOf,'-.SO
0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 0.2548 O. Z5Y ~ 10,000.00 $ Zr:;Llb.OO
2573.501 BALE CHECK EACH 10 30 5.00 $ ISD. oC)
2575.501 SEEDING ARCE 0,1 5,000.00 $
.,
2575.502 SEED, MIXTURE 650 POUND 5 5.00 $
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SOYD 250 bOO 1.50 $ qOO. DO
/ /
TOTAL NORTHLAND AVE. $ /Q408b. 03
..
PAGE20F 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
WILLIAM ST. L.I. 297
e 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 0.2063 O. Zf.)03 40,000.00 $ fjz...sZ,QO
CLEARING TREE 1 3 100.00 $ 3co 00
2101.502
2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 1 4 100.00 $ 460 .0(.)
2104.501 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER UN FT 150 /S-O 1.00 $ /SV.OO
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. WALK SQYD 845.6 <'=:,78 1.00 $ b78.00
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. DRIVEWAY PVM1SQ YD 86.3 LIb.. <-I 1.50 $ bCj.bO
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. PVMT. SQYD 145 72..- 2.00 $ /4'1.00
2104.511 SAWING CONC. PAVEMENT (8") UN FT 173 /S-O 8.00 $ 1200. DO
2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (4") UN FT 168 IbB 3.00 $ 9:>/, 00
2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 4 L.f 15.00 $ bO.Q()
2104.523 SALVAGE STREET NAME SIGN EACH 5 S- 15.00 $ 75;, aU
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CUYD 3460 '-1887 5.00 $ Z'f42,<;;; 00
2105.522 SELECT GRAN. BORROW (LV) CUYD 1622 18Z0 5.00 $ CfIOO.OU
2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) CUYD 250 ZOll 9.00 $ /83b. DO
2123.501 COMMON LABORER HR 16 I"L- 30.00 $ .360.00
2123.507 1 CU YO SHOVEL HR 8 .3 80.00 $ ? 1/0.00
. 2123.509 DOZER HR 8 42.00 $
2123.510 10 CU YD TRUCK HR 8 55.00 $
2123.514 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADER HR 8 .3 60.00 $ /130.00
2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 10 ..3 25.00 $ 7 C;;, 08
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 TON 1369 177/.07 5.00 $ 8f:;<s/:,'. b~
2231.501 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIX. TON 15 2~ 50.00 $ / ZSO, 0()
0105.604 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE FOUND. TON 30 8.00 $ .
.
2301.501 CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQYD 145 100./3 22.00 $ 22oZ.8b
2301.511 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE CUYD 32 /5:9 150.00 $ Z38S: C;C)
2301.529 REINFORCEMENT BARS POUND 22 L/.88 1.00 $ '1.88
0301.604 PAVEMENT JOINT DESIGN A UN FT 18 18 15.00 $ 770.(.,:0
0301.604' PAVEMENT JOINT DESIGN L3 UN FT 18 16 15.00 $ ?7D,OO
0301.604 PAVEMENT JOINT DESIGN L1TH UN FT 18 /8 15.00 $ 2-7D. 0()
0301.604 PAVEMENT JOINT DESIGN L2KTH LINFT 18 18 15.00 $ 270. co
0301.604 PAVEMENT JOINT DESIGN L1TH UN FT 18 18 15.00 $ Z. 70. au
2340.508 TYPE 41A WEAR COURSE MIX. TON 408 40~ <./2" 23.75 $ 9:ozB.73
.. 2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIX. TON 614 b/3. q i:. 21.50. $ 132CO. 1,/
2357.5~2 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 185 18~ 1.00 $ / (j(: DC,.)
PAGE 3 OF 11 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
.
PAGE 4 OF 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
SHERBURNE ST.L1. 298
_2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1879 0., 187C, 40,000.00 $ 7S/hob
REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L1N FT 33 fjL/ 15.00 $ IZbD.OCJ
2104.501
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. WALK SOYD 85 SO.3 1.00 $ 9:).30
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. DRIVEWAY PVMl SO YD 89 CJO.ob 1.50 $ 13S-.C(~
2104.509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EACH 4 ~ 250.00 $ /!;(X).OO
2104.511 SAWING CONC. PAVEMENT (8") L1N FT 60 (.s-. 8.00 $ bOO. 00
2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (4") L1N FT 277 2~7 3.00 $ 63 I . () 0
2104.521 SALVAGE STONE CURB L1N FT 2008 Z 2..S0 1.25 $ Zb/2 . s:-O
2104.521 SALVAGE STONE GUTTER L1N FT 2008 Z:Z-S"O 1.25 $ 2E3 12...;D
2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 5 co 15.00 $ 7S,DO
=>
2104.523 SALVAGE STREET NAME SIGN EACH 3 -. 15.00 $ 1..1 \;.0 ()
"',
--'
0104.603 SALVAGE DRIVEWAY BRICK SOFT 157 7'1 3.00 $ 22-2.00
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CUYD 1625 .!:..OS-L 5.00 $ / s-'d::O .00
2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) CUYD 315 400 9.00 $ ~{)O.oO
2123.501 COMMON LABORER HR 16 30.00 $
2123.507 1 CU YD SHOVEL HR 8 80.00 $
.2123.509 DOZER HR 8 42.00 $
2123.510 10 CU YO TRUCK HR 8 55.00 $
2123.514 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADER HR 8 60.00 $
2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 10 2.S;- 25.00 $ bZ.~
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 TON 1668 22/C{.70 5.00 $ / I DC; 8. C; 0
2231.501 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIX. TON 20 '-I7.C, s;- 50.00 $ 22F/7. sO
0105.604 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE FOUND. TON 20 8.00 $
2340.508 TYPE 41A WEAR COURSE MIX. TON 386 4bc'(.l.f I 23.75 $ 1/ SOl{. ''-/
2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIX. TON 515 Sb3.7 21.50 $ /z/l0.s~
2357.502 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 234 23'-1 1.00 $ 231..{.00
2503.541 12" RCP PIPE SEWER,
DES. 3006.CL. 5 L1N FT 77 /07. s;- 25.00 $ Zb87.$V
0503.602 CUT IN 12" X 4" WYE EACH 1 1.800.00 $
0503.602 CUT IN 6" X 4" WYE EACH 1.200.00 $
0503.602 CONNECT TO EX. MANHOLE EACH 1 2,000.00 $ 2000 .00
0503.603 8" PVC SAN SEWER,
. 0503.603 SDR 35 10'-12' DEEP UN FT 57 S7 23.00. $ /3/1.60
4" PVC SERVICE PIPE SDR 35 L1N FT 30 27 16.00 $ 932.00
PAGE 5 OF 11 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
0503.603 REHABILITATE SAN. MANHOLE L1N FT 35.55 3S- 175.00 $ ~/2S: (;;0
0503.603 LOWER 2" P.V.C. FORCEMAIN UNFT 40 SO 35.00 $ /7.>0.00 e
0504.602 EX. FOR CITY INSTALLED CORP. EACH 10 4 300.00 $ 12eo.OO
0504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING CORP. EACH 19 17 200.00 $ 3'100,00
0504.602 CONN. TO EX. WATER SERVICE EACH 19 20 100.00 $ 2000.00
0504.602 314" CITY INSTAlLED CORP. EACH 10 L{ 75.00 $ .3CO,OO
0504.602 314" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 10 Z'2- 200.00 $ 4l/0D. OJ
0504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 3 3 160.00 $ (.180. co
0504.602 6" X 6" TAPPING VALVE &
SLEEVE & G. V. BOX EACH 2,200.00 $
0504.602 RELOCATE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 4 200.00 $
0504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP EACH 4 100.00 $
,
0504.603 314" COPPER WATER SERVICE L1N FT 660 5"th.OO 13.00 $ 7br;;-;.00
0504.603 6" D.I.P. WATERMAIN CL52 L1N FT 67 23.00 $
0504.620 D.I.P. FITTINGS POUND 35 3.00 $
2506.507 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
STRUCTURE, DESIGN X UNFT 17.37 IS- 180.00 $ 27CO .00
2506.516 CAST. ASSEMBLY TYPE, R-1733 EACH 3 ? 300.00 $ c,OO . 00
.....-'
2506.516 CAST. ASSEMBLY TYPE, R-3067 EACH 6 b 250.00 $ I~CX). 00 .
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 5 s;- 200.00 $ looe. ()()
2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SOFT 600 LfS3 1.50 $ " 7f';.S-O
0521.602 INSTALL DRIVEWAY BRICK SOFT 157 7(/ 7.00 $ 5/B.oo
2531.501 CONC. CURB & GUTTER,
DESIGN B618 UNFT 2330 225:0 5.00 $ II Zt;;o. 00
0557.602 INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN EACH 3 Lt 30.00 $ / zo, 00 '.
0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 0.1879 O. I 87 7 10,000.00 $ 1877.00
2573.501 BALE CHECK EACH 24 8 5.00 $ c..; 0, oc.)
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SOYD 2200 2(,,00 1.50 $ 39CO.OO
/ I
TOTAL SHERBURNE ST. $ 1323bb. 4 e '- I
I
.'
PAGE60F 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
. .
SIXTH ST. 1.I. 299
_ 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 0.1333 Q. /333 40,000.00 $ 5332.00
2101.502 CLEARING TREE 3 100.00 $
2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 3 100.00 $
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. WALK SOYD 382 (d3;8 1.00 $ bbB. a:::J
2104.505 REMOVE CONC. DRIVEWAY PVMl SO YD 79.4 40.2... 1.50 $ YJ.30
2104.511 SAWING CONC. PAVEMENT (8") L1N FT 63 7Co 8,00 $ b08.0:::.;
2104.513 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (4") L1N FT 130 /30 3,00 $ 2/ID. DO
2104.521 SALVAGE STONE CURB L1N FT 1470 /S5/ 1.25 $ 1138.7C;;-
2104.521 SALVAGE STONE GUTTER UN FT 1470 /~<;I 1.25 $ /938.7C;;-
2104.523 SALVAGE CASTING EACH 6 '-( 15.00 $ 60.c...0
2104.523 SALVAGE STREET NAME SIGN EACH 2 Z- 15.00 $ 30.00
0104.603 SALVAGE DRIVEWAY BRICK SOFT 132 3.00 $
2105.501 COMMON EXCA VATION(P) CUYD 1255 Z'=-B L.. 5.00 $ /3 LI 10 0 6
2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (L.V.) CUYD 110 00 9.00 $ 8/0, CO
2123.501 COMMON LABORER HR 16 1(':) 30.00 $ <f f.;() . c;<..)
2123.507 1 CU YD SHOVEL HR 8 ~I 80.00 $ 320. ('X~
. 2123.509 DOZER HR 8 42.00 $
2123.510 10 CU YD TRUCK HR 8 55.00 $
2123.514 2 CU YD FRONT END LOADER HR 8 4 60.00 $ Zl/O,CO
2130.501 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 10 I 25.00 $ Z<:;;:.Ov
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 TON 1072 [3b8~ C,O 5.00 $ bEY-/'-I. <;;0
2231.501 BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIX. TON 10 22- 50.00 $ / /00.00
2340.508 TYPE 41A WEAR COURSE MIX. TON 231 2 'I<=' C./'-'I 23.75 $ 58(..(, . 0 /
2340.514 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIX. TON 462 4/9.3"=- 21.50 $ C/O/b. Zt(
2357.502 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 140 Ii-/O 1.00 $ /L/O, CC
2503.541 12" RCP PIPE SEWER,
DES. 3006,CL. 5 UN FT 35 2O.S- 25.00 $ 5/2.5;0
0503.602' CUT IN 6" X 4" WYE EACH 3 'f 1,200.00 $ l./tfXJ. 00
0503.602 6" X 4" WYE EACH 2 'l 100.00 $ l../OD 100
0503.602 CONNECT TO EX. SAN. SERVICE EACH 2 3 700.00 $ 2/00.06
.
PAGE 7 OF 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
.
I
\
0503.603 6'" PVC SAN SEWER REPAIR
SDR 35 10'-12' DEEP L1N FT 20 L/3 23.00 $ Q8C;.OO
0503.603 4" PVC SERVICE PIPE SDR 35 L1N FT 75 ..33 16.00 $ 528,0:::; e
0503.603 REHABILITATE SAN. MANHOLE L1N FT 33.72 Zfo 175.00 $ 4S~O,OO
0504.602 EX. FOR CITY INSTAlLED CORP. EACH 6 3 300.00 $ 900.00
0504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING CORP. EACH 8 ( 200.00 $ ZOO .00
0504.602 CONN. TO EX. WATER SERVICE EACH 8 .3 100.00 $ .3OD,QU
0504.602 3/4" CITY INSTAllED CORP. EACH 6 3 75.00 $ 2.2..5".00
I .
0504.602 3/4" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 4 '-I 200.00 $ ex; . eX-)
0504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 3 3 160.00 $ '180.00
0504.602 RELOCATE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 5 200.00 $
0504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP EACH 8 100.00 $
0504.603 3/4" COPPER WATER SERVICE L1N FT 110 q2..- , 13.00 $ 1/9t..OO
2506.507 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
STRUCTURE, DESIGN X L1N FT 10.11 q 180.00 $ /bZO.OQ
2506.516 CAST. ASSEMBLY TYPE, R-1733 EACH 4 L/ 300.00 $ j2Q).OO
2506.516 CAST. ASSEMBLY TYPE, R-3067 EACH 3 .3 250.00 $ 7S0,OO
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 21' Z- 200.00 $ 400.00
2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SOFT 3160 S8<5"/ 1.50 $ 877h.SO .
0521.602 INSTAlL DRIVEWAY BRICK SOFT 132 7.00 $
2531.5Cl1 CONC. CURB & GUTTER,
DESIGN B618 L1N FT 1582 /55;/ 5.00 $ 77~'CX)
2531.507 6" CONC. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SOYD 145 /ZL 25.00 $ 3050.00
SPEC. CONCRETE STEPS S.F. RISE 25 25.00 $
0557.602 INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN EACH 2 z.. 30.00 $ b() . cx:;/
0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 0.1333 O. 1333 10,000.00 $ /333,00
2573.501 BALE CHECK EACH 9 l-f 5.00 $ W.O:::>
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SOYD 750 1000 1.50 $ /S;00,00
TOTAL SIXTH ST. $ q31 74Z.. ss- t/
.
PAGE 8 OF 11
SHORT ELLlOlT HENDRICKSON, INC.
.'
0504.602 3/4" CITY INSTALLED CORP.' EACH 3 Z- 75.00 $ /SO .CX::/
0504.602 3/4" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 3 5 200.00 $' /OOO~~
0504.602 ADJUST GATE VAlVE BOX EACH 8 b 160.00 $ /2.E;J::.7 .CO .
0504.602 RELOCATE CURB STOP & BOX EACH 5 200.00 $
0504.602 ADJUST CURB STOP EACH 10 100.00 $
0504.603 3/4". COPPER WATER SERVICE L1N FT 155 7-/, 13.00 $ ZhZ/.OO
2506.507 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
STRUCTURE, DESIGN X L1N FT 14.26 /0 180.00 $ /800.00
2506.507 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
" STRUCTURE, DESIGN Y L1N FT 4.65 3.S- 325.00 $ //37. SO
2506.507 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE
SmUCTURE, DESIGN B L1N FT 7.22 S- 280.00 $ /'IOO.OQ
2506.516 CAST. ASSEMBLY TYPE, R-3067 EACH 5 Lf 250.00 $ /000.00
2506.522 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 6 ~ 200.00 $ 1000.00
2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK SOFT 6052 5Bes- 1.50 $ 8827. s;o
0521.602 4" CONC. WAlK-REINFORCED SOFT 1080 2.00 $
0531.604 T CONCRETE CROSS-GUTTER SOYD 43.9 43 25.00 $ I07~ 00
2531.501 CONC. CURB & GUTTER,
DESIGN B618 L1N FT 1732 /71::0 5.00 $ ty;OO,OO .
2531.507 6" CONC. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SOYD 151.6 /7"- 25.00 $ 'NOD. 00
0557.602 INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN EACH 6 ~ 30.00 $ leo. OD
0557.603 INSTALL METAL RAIL FENCE L1N FT 180 Il:D 20.00 $ 3&:::x::>. 0 C
0557.603 INSTALL WOOD FENCE L1N FT 50 - 10.00 $
0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 0.21n o~ 7../7 7 10,000.00 $ 2/77. 00
2564.531 F & I SIGN PANELS TYPE C SOFT 37.5 37.5:"'" 25.00 $ Cj.37. SO
2573.501 BALE CHECK . EACH 21 6 5.00 $ <(0.00
2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SOYD 1250 /300 1.50 $ /950.00
TOTAL MULBERRY ST. $ 14Ib~.IO L./
TOTAL PROJECT $ ,qq~fo81. 77-.t/.
,
.
PAGE 10 OF 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. .
,
.
.... I
,.1,
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
Total Contract
e Amount
$671,412.05
Total Amount Eamed
Material Suitably Stored on Site, Not Incorporated into Work
Contract Change Order No.
Contract Change Order No.
Contract Change Order No.
I
% Complete /00
% Complete
% Complete
Gross Amount Due......................................... $ 703 q '1/ oL.--z.-/
Less -e- % Retainage............................. $
Amount Due to Date....................................... $ 703, 97 I 0 7 '"Z- / /
Less Previous Applications...._....................... $. ~E.;f:fit/. 9/ /
Amount Due This Application......................... $ b 5'.0 lC::, . B I 1../
\ 1-
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT
The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress payments received from
the Owner on account of work perfonned under the contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to
discharge in full all obligations of the undersigned incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for
Payment under said contract, and (2) all materials and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or
covered by this Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances.
Dated ~-/O ~ ~ '/JLI .:ENe-.
(Contracto
iT t'" &~
.
By:
(Name and Title)
County of c.,u..4S H ,NC /0 ~
State of JrJ l;JifScJ '(,4
Before me on this ~ day of h1' ~y , 19~personallyappeared C#4k:LES 6.4BIc--/J
known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the ~/2J':JF--c-r /114 .I\I~€fgf the Contractor
above mentioned; that he executed the above Application for Payment and A Idavit on behalf of sai Contractor; and that
all of the statements contained therein are true, correct and complete.
My Commission Expires ,/;, ,IOcJ
The undersigned has checked the Contractor's Application for Payment shown above. A part of this Application is the )
Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this Contract have been applied by him to discharge
in full all of his obligations in connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for Payment.
In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned approves payment to the Contractor of the Amount Due.
. SHORTaTLlOTT ~END~K~N, INC.
By. 1'~ cJ- C - tLi.t::-
Date
('r\~
IV(, (qq,
{
.
PAGE 11 OF 11
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.
.~
2
.~
S
1
1
1
~
2
'S
~
~
.~
LAW OFFICE OF
JEANNE M. ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
MAY 06 1996
May 3, 1996
Dave Magnuson
333 North Main Street, Suite #202
P.O. Box 438
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Driveway License/Stacy Jo
Thompson
Dear Dave:
We have been playing telephone tag for several days,
and it is possible that we will have spoken by the time you
receive this letter. At any rate, I am writing to discuss
with you the issue of the Agreement referenced above. I am
representing Kevin Tilka who owns the neighboring parcel.
As you may know, Steve Russell provided a letter to Swager
Brothers in 1988 stating that he was not aware of any
easements infringing on the use of North First Street for
access to Mr. Tilka's site.. I am enclosing a copy of this
letter for your reference.
I am questioning whether this letter could serve as an
estoppel by the city of Stil~water in granting the License
to Ms. Thompson. Based on Mr. Russell's statement, it was
Mr. Tilka's understanding that he would have access to North
First Street and that there would be no easement granted on
North First Street. Contrary to the statements in the 1988
letter, the city granted a driveway License Agreement which,
as you pointed out involved no notice to Mr. Tilka and which
came as quite a surprize to him. AS you can imagine, my
client was upset especially considering he believed this
issue had been resolved back in 1988.
(
I am requesting that the City revoke the License
Agreement, considering Mr. Russell's statement.
Alternatively, I request the City modify the License
Agreement to address the following concerns of my client:
1. Erosion
2. Drainage
226 East Myrtle Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 + 612-430-0395 + FAX 612-430-8479
.
e
3. Snow Plowing
4. Snow melt
5. Headlights
6. Assessments
7. Parking of vehicles on the driveway
8. Landscaping
9. Access to North First Street
10. Septic drainage
11. Property value
Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss
this as I know that the lot owner, Kevin LaCasse is working
on the design for his home and will be building his driveway
soon.
Yours truly,
Anderson
~;
cc: Kevin Tilka
\
e
..
e
e
~il~te~
";:""",, OF .,,"'~
March 15, 1988
Swager Brothers, Inc.
5898 Omaha Avenue
Stillwater, MN 55082
Attention: Kevin Tilka
Dear Mr. Tilka:
In reference to Lot 6, Block 49 Carli and Schulenburg's
Addition, access to that lot is provided from East Hazel
Street and North First Street. I am not aware of any
easement infringing upon use of those streets for access
to the site.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, feel
free to call.
erely,
eve RU~
Community Development Director
c
CITY HALL 216 ~JORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MIN~JESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
,..
J
- .
LICENSE
e
The City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota hereby grants to Stacy 10 Thompson, her
heirs, assignees and transferees, a License to construct and maintain a driveway on a portion of a public
street of the City, in accordance with and subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. PUBLIC PROPERTY. The public property is an unimproved portion of North First Street
south of Hazel Street and North of Willow Street (the Public Property) shown on the attached Exhibit
"A".
2. ACCESS. The Public Property will be used to gain access to a driveway proposed to be
constructed partially on the Public Property for the purpose of gaining ingress and egress to a residential
dwelling house proposed to be constructed on Lot 5, Block 49 Carli and Schulenberg's addition (the
private property) also shown on the attached Exhibit "A".
3. SITE PLAN. That the design of the driveway and the placement of the dwelling house
have been given approval by the City as shown on the attached Exhibit "B" .
4. EASEMENT RIGHTS. Easement rights to the public property are hereby granted and are
perpetual and shall be appurtenant to and shall run with and bind the Public Property and shall include
the right of access and to construct and maintain utilities thereon. However, Licensee acquires no vested
rights in the ~blic Property beyond what is expressly granted by this paragraph.
5. STANDARDS AND DESIGN. The rough grading and the application of any surfacing to
the driveway is subject to the direction and control of the City Public Works Director.
6. EROSION CONTROL. The Licensee will establish turf as soon as possible on any areas
exposed by construction of the driveway, and shall provide erosion control devices to prevent erosion
during construction.
7. MAINTENANCE. The Licensee is responsible for all maintenance and snow plowing of the
Public Property and shall be responsible for all maintenance and snow plowing of the driveway.
~
8. WAIVER OF ASSESSMENT. In the event the City deems it necessary or is compelled to
improve the Public Property,/ the licensee hereby waives her right to appeal the assessment based upon
any claim that the property is served by a driveway or that the property is not benefitted by public
improvements because it is served by an on-site septic system and functioning well. If the property is
served by a functioning septic system and well, the City will treat the assessment as a hook up charge
to be collected when the property is hooked up to the system. The hook up will not be ordered if the
system is adequately functioning.
e
9. HOLD HARMLESS. In consideration of the issuance of this licenset Licensee agrees to
release and forever discharge the City of Stillwater, its officers, agents and employees from any and all
claims or causes of action based upon the failure to provide municipal streets, sewer or water services,
or the adequacy, qual ity, condition or design of any public utilities available to the Property, and the
Licensee agrees that they are proceeding at their own risk with the construction of a dwelling house on
the private property based upon conditions that are now in place and without any assurances from the City
that the level of municipal streets, sewer or water service can ever be improved.
~ witness whereof, the City has hereunto set its hand and seal this 1"7 -zlaay of
(fJc.~J , 1995.
e
#P
ay. , Mayor
A TIEST:
ACCEPTANCE
.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Licensee has l~ebto sets her hand in acceptance of the
conditions set forth in this License this J(cf1-\ day of .. :.\ ,.y-- , 1995.
LICENSEE:
=--- ~~
~~JO - - - .0- --
9'5 loll fQ ICJr
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
David T. Magnuson #66400
Magnuson Law Firm
333 North Main Street, Suite 202
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 439-9464
8 MARCELLA C WATZL
NOTARY PU6UC . _
HENNEPIN CO NESOTA
. . My Cotnmllllon UNTY
. January 31, ~
.'''';
_I
: SURVEY MADE EXCLUSIVRL'l FOR; Mr. Kenneth Seefert, era i x land E xca vat i n9 .
10003 N. Mendel Rd., Stillwater, MN 55082
Ol':SCRIPTI0N: As described on Doc. Nos. 399058,399059 and 399060,
Office of the County Recorder, Wash. Co., Minnesota.
NOTES: Orientation of this bearing system is assumed.
o Indicates iron plpe monument'inplace marked
6 with a plastic plug inscribed RLS '13774.
I uM." Indicates
measured value.
"R." Indicates
record value.
Note description ga~
as shown hereon.
Bit. Pavt. and .drlve-
way locations shown
are approx.
Underground or over.
head private or pub.
utile on or adjacent
the site were not
lac. in the course
of this survey. .
Carli and Schulen-
burg I s Add. is
recorded as Doc.
No. 416049, Wash.
Co. Records.
e
~
~
"'l
I 0
\,.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
U^lU~KTr M. STACK
STll.I.W^Tl~R. MtNN. S SlHU
MINNESOTA lU:CISTERf.U
l.AND SURVEYOR
id. No. 439-5630
Jon NO:
None
~
~
~
\\\
\~
~.~
Iii. 0 NiJ. JYf'tJS"$
Mt. 7.1 F~r
.
~
--
/'f./~ 9~
.e 0 /.ft:'
t.:
~
I
8~. +,
\~
t~~
~~(
~.
-
..
-
.5
tqv..
. ~
~~
.., ~
~~
t~
~'"
'~
,
. ~
.... j)~. IV". .J19d!l9 ';
'" .1'11. Z7 r:--=~7'
..
"
~
,q~;.1
(,"t'
I p;J.
It
~
~
..
0\
CI\
,
~
k~
fJ\~
~
4::
~l~v~~
f
, 3
,., 7
~ . b'J,ev
~ './,!,f" A_
.. .. t"./ '" T
~ ./~ I
~
~
..
j
. I
\
!
piP:. #.1. JJWt:1~t7
,
~
~ ):~
.. 0
'.
\
.eo /$4:1 r
H./<t1o'f.9.3
---
_N8"Zt1'~6"~
-..-~---
-----..
'-.-
---
hvr.' 0
~
--------...---- ~
/":: Po '
51':
lilT.
.WI/.J.OVl!
-----..---
~"
\
~st-lt... brand fax transmittal memo 7671
1'l>> f rotft
~
Co.
Co.
PM.,<<-
pt.
Exhibit "A"
'.
__~Me:RICAH
__' _ _'. __ _ -::::!lH I TOR I AI-
.___ SUp...
.............. ~1~7...,.
_________- _179:58
...... ..
---.
.---..
........
J.
P.02
..........
--.._--
.... ---
...---
--..-
.
'7
!\
f
~ 'a \
\ r
~ . ~
~~
~ B
F So:(
....r .".
~ ti
~ tl
SJ
~t
)t.
~~
~t\
1'\
Jf
1
:----~
::] ,
~
-....
_e._
---
.---
-.---
e
.....- _ ----l
, ~.,.~--
"
~ ~ 1
~ I I'
t I' J
~ I'~ \
. '1 .
: Il i
~ll-t_-1
.'
__ I
t ~ -r .
""" '" I
~.t
I .
~ !1
\ r : ~
1..1- __J
....-. ..--:;::;
.-. ...;:;~-,.......~ --' . ~
... "'"1. .~'-' '.' . ~
.~
-----1 ... ~
~..
. 1-~
"~ 1 i
I 1\
. l
I .';tl,,, >
, ;) t.l
lir.~~
~ ,,~~ 3
. ~ 1~ ~
I i~ t ~
j. Pi l ~
7;\ \1\iJ~!
. '-'~ . , .
. . ' .
. _ l .' (
: .. '"" ~ C ·
.~~\ \ ~~1
-: .. 'f~ \, ; .............. Ii I i ~ ~\t
\ ' \. ...... .' .... ....:.. .....___ ...... ~ I
. .. ....,.... ----.... -~ 'j
.. .." .' .
::H' ......:'~',.t.~ :-rBfr-- - "'.).. ~.. _L...:~-~ 1 \ ~
.,' ; _ _ ;~l~ -,:....-- It.:! i" rJ ~
~ _ _ _ _ _ t' ~l ; ~ - - - - -' r --i \ ~ ~ "
, ____.,., .. . n'
..................._.....-I~:'..-...~. ______ : L , ,
. I 'i1'1'........ .. - --;---; Q t. ~
l' I ~1A.~ .............1....:. j. \
~... ' ,. t.. ~ .1.;) ~
l-'---"-- ; JL::.... -1-.J ~. I ~
--- ... . ~' "
--t
0.-.
:"t
.
t
~
.
Exhibit ''B"
e
Ie
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, 'Community Development Director V
DA: May 16, 1996
RE: LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN BLOCK 1, LOTS 25 AND 26 (SUB/96-36)
The request is a lot line adjustment between Lot 25 and Lot 26, Oak Glen Subdivision.
The adjustment is a pie shaped parcel of 1,812 square feet. The adjustment is needed
to have conforming setbacks for the garage on Lot 25.
The lot line adjustments has no impact on the future development of the lots.
Recommendation:
Approval
Attachment: Application and plans
e
Date Filed:
Fee Paid:
Receipt No. :
, ~.
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
ACTION REQUESTED:
FEE(l)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ Certificate of Compliance
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
_ Conditional or Special Use Permit
_ Design Review
_ Planned Unit Development
Variance
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
_ Subdivision
vResubdivision
Total Fee
$70
$70/170
-0-
$270
$70
$300
$300
~+)Oflot
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Address ofProject/5~AMcJJJ()S/)N L.A^ie;. Assessor's Parcel No. loG:,co- ~Z<So
Zoning District Description of Project Lcr "2" ,sl.U.. I --- OAlL- ~ LeN
'-.
Telephone No..
Signat
Signature
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Feet
Total building floor Area sq. ft.
Existing sq. ft.
Proposed sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft,
Number of off street parking spaces provided
Lot Size (dimensions) x
Land Area
Height of Buildings: Stories
Principal
Accessory
e(l)ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE REQUIRED AS PART OF APPLICATION
REVIEW
Revised 9/19/95
CERTIFICATE
of
SURVEY
Folz, l'ree.maD, Dupq It Associates, Inc.
~ l.ANll _I,CINO .LANO P\.AHNlNO
~ ---.---. -
. (Ilal .....u
e
NOms
~
"
~
N
W+E
S
~
ICWIl
J M. 1.
SURVIY POB: Dan aa4 LaVJ'I'le ~
1630 4m'llD48cm Lan.
SUlhrater. 11M 6l108Z
s.. I.t.taohed aM" tor Le,al ~pUoD.l
OCNOTlS t/2 IkCH IRON PIP( IlI~T
fClUH(.l A.HO IllARK([I WlTI1 A F'LAsnc c....-
lNSCRlSCD "RL.S 92J2w, UNL.(SS SHO~
OflolfRWst:.
ORI01TAnON Of THIS BEARING SYSTEw 15 THE
RfCQIilOU) fl'\J,T Of OM W"~.
, "
"
"
"
"
DENOTES 1/:2 INCH ~OH PIPE MONUIllOtl
SET N-IO IolAFtK(() MTH A PLAsnc CAP
INSCRiBl:D -RLS 17252-, uNlESS SI-101llN
OIl1E.A".st.
,
Q~
o
urr IU
((J)kIR:
\
\
\
" \
"
\
.,. ':~
'\~
~~,
/"
'" Angl. PCIn' In - ../
SOUlh.."Slerly
LiM of Lot 26
..
\
\
,.
,.
\ "
\
\
\
\
urr ..,
I I1[RUlY CUlTJfY TkAl ni'S DftA'MNG IS A CORRECT MP<<€.SOITATtON
or THIS SlJfht:y A.HD AU. 1Il0000000TS I1A~ 8t:DI Pl..ACf.O iN TW"
GIl'OL.IHD AS~. THIS SUR'o'tY Ok Pl...AN ~s ~ARED tly IlIE OR
UNDER MY 0lA[C1 SUPUh'lSlON AND I AilIl A OUI. '( REGlSlUCED L.AHO
SlJR\I[,(QR UNDER THE LAWS Of" ni[ STATE OF 1IlINNESOTA.
MVCE A. fOLZ lIIlJrtH[SOTA It(QSl"AllCf( NO. 9;O;t DATE:
nWOTHY J. HtLEMI\lI lIIINtr4ES01A REQSJRMIOH ~ 169809
_ DAYO L OUf'AY WNMESOTA Rf:QSTRAllON NO. 17252
NOTE: ornew. COPIIS or. THIS IUP .uti: CIWIP SUl.&D
e
01l~'" bJ' ro1.. "...... Dv.", . ~ia&.., b1c.
e
Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates, Inc.
I Ul.d N I LAND SURVEYING · LAND PLANNING
I w -<>- It 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE. STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082
s (612)439-8833
May 13, 1996
LAND DESCRIPTION FOR DAN SPENCER
LAND FROM NICHOLA! M. ELIASEN, JR. AND DIANNE ELIAS EN
TO DANIEL FRANCIS SPENCER AND LA VYRLE J. SPENCER
PARCEL A
That part of Lot 26, Block I, OAK GLEN, according to the plat on fIle in the office of the
County Recorder, Washington Counry, Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said. Lot 26; thence South 38 degrees 54 minutes 34
seconds East. bearing oriented to said pla~ along the southwesterly line of said. Lot 26 a distance
of 20.90 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line of Loe 26 and the paine of beginning of
the line to be described; thence North 55 degrees 08 minutes 55 seconds East 91.62 feet; thence
North 53 degrees 54 minutes 50 seconds East 74.99 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 26
and said line there terminate. containing 1812 square feet. more or less.
Subject to a drainage and utility easement over. under and across the southeasterly 6.00 feet
thereof.
LAND DESCRIPTION FOKDAN SPEN€ER
RESIDVE. Oli LOT2~
P'ARCEL~
That pm of Lot 26. Block 1, OAK GLEN. according to the plat on file in the office of the
County Recorder. Washington County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following described line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 26; thence South 38 degrees 54 minutes 34
seconds East. bearing oriented to said. plat. along the southwesterly line of said Lot 26 a diseance
of 20.90 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line of Loe 26 and the point of beginning of
the line to be described; thence North 55 degrees 08 minutes 55 seconds East 91.62 feet; thence
North 53 degrees 54 minuees 50 seconds Ease 74.99 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 26
and said line there terminate, containing 15391 square feet, more or less.
Subject co ~ drainage and utility easement over, under and across the northwesterly 6.00 feet
thereof.
[ hereby certify thal this survey. plan. or report was prc:pan:d by me or
under my direct supervision and thaL [ am a duly RcglSlCrcd Land
urveyor u er the laws of the State o[ Minnesota.
e
}{cgislraLlon No. 17:52
e
e
l '",
Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates, Inc.
IlI.Id N I LAND SURVEYING · LAND PLANNING
. t.w ~ a 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE · STIlLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082
" (612) 439-8833
May 13, 1996
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
FROM DANIEL FRANCIS SPENCER AND LA VYRLE J. SPENCER
AND NICHOLAI M. ELIASEN, JR. AND DIANNE ELIASEN
TO THE CITY OF STILL WATER
A 12.00 toO[ wide drainage and utility easement over. under and across that pan of LO[ 26 and
Lot 25, Block 1, OAK GLEN, according the plat on file in the office of the County Recorder.
Washington County. Minnesota lying 6.00 feet each side of the following described center line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said. Lot 26; thence South 38 degrees 54 minutes 34
seconds East. bearing oriented to said plat, along the southwesterly line of said. Lot 26 a distance
of 20.90 feet to an angle point in said southwesterly line of Lot 26 and the poine of beginning of
the center line to be described.; thence North 55 degrees 08 minutes 55 seconds East 91.62 feet;
thence North 53 degrees 54 minutes 50 seconds East 74.99 feet to the northeast corner of said
Lot 26 and said center line there terminate.
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT V ACA TIO~
BY THE CITY 01+ STILL WA TER
To vacate that part of the 12.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement lying 6.00 feet each side
of line between Lot 25 and Lot 26. Block 1, OAK GLEN. according to the plat on file in the
office of the County Recorder. Washington County, Minnesota lying southwesterly of the
northeasterly 12.00 feet of said Lots 25 and 26 and lying northeasterly of the southwesterly 12.00
feet of said Lots 25 and 26.
I hereby ccrtify lhat this survey. plan. or report was
prepared by me or under my dircct supt.'TVlsion and
that I am a duly RcgistCTcd Land Surveyor un<.1er the
~ of lh' 'lale of Minnesota.
DaVId L Dupav
Date: S" / /3 I'H~ Reglsll'31Ion No. 17-:52
{ J
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA:
May 16,1996..
RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, PRIME SITE SUBDIVISION IN THE
BUSINESS PARK - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. CITY OF STILLWATER,
APPLICANT (CASE NO. SUB-96-37)
RE:
The request is to resubdivide Lot 4, Block 1, Prime Site Subdivision, by splitting it into
one lot of 55,200 square feet. The remainder of Lot 4 would be combined with a
redefined lot containing the remainder of Lot 4, (33,175 square feet) and Lots 1, 2, and
3. The new lot is the lot purchased by the City for Colonial Craft. The Lot 4 would then
be available for private development in the future.
Recommendation: Approval of subdivision (resolution).
Attachments: Resubdivision Map.
J!-
...
I ~r
I,. :./
-- . r - _...~-.~-~;.:;;......~ :- ...
/. .... "~C.lt.t9 $.-:111.';) tt n9 .tI.U.l-V tHOI~-.
/ ~ CI.nr;;i:""ll ~tUl r"
'-..-- - I
I Iii II~
I ~-~ 1 I~
I; -
I L 101 I I~ 9 101 I [:
-RJ...
~oL-/gq!J1'C
:!t'(Jb / SL.~~.J:6. t)~ t7JL. b -vw~
"~ dJLb.l y~~
gO /~ f.
:l' ~ sl$ U ~ ~~101
fi' bb J7Jb'OP) ~~#lel-
~ ' ~ LL- OJ I bO) l ~ I =t=f 1.01
-1ff-r'.5.5 =- (; :tF-1o-]
..... -.... ... ....__... 4"". .... ...."'"
~ ~
~1 ~
~: I
,. lj
. ......... ". ~.... .C.",
~."'.." .....~ .....----......
~
H
ill
....
>'3
~
~~.. ....A "..._~.. .
- ~....LPJ. .
,........4'..-...-...c. ~
.-..,.. .:,?:..?c/ "
I) ....0....0.:1.. illS J.....,
:'J::'~::':~.::7t.:::
. ......"""..... -Ira: .-'!.., ..,.. .-..... .....1. ..
ft......... t~.. ~... .......... .-0. ..,. .,... ... _...
.....41 ... .. .a..... __ "'1:". 4:_.... .... __
........ ,... ......... .. ., ....... ..., ....... ....
..... -- ..... ...... (HOt'
. ....'U ~.-.. _I...., "'1 .,......... .... 0("'"
.:-=:=-':~W;:';.:~:,,:~ --:::~:=:,".':J
t.... "WlInO'llllll .11..'"",S .. """Oje ..... ,."'"
.. n~ ., "''''_.. ,. "'IS
f.....~ .... ~ ..,~. ..,....... ...".... .~..,
.. -...,.."'..... ....... "'-t......... "_'-" .
....... ..."'" ~i..)I,J.4 )SJt44 ... IIJ.. 11.. -0....
". c .......... I d)-o.. -r\""d~":;;4
~.
.... .....:::-::.:::..::= .
......,. '-,,- ,.., .....,
~
C,
'0
~j
~
:i
,.,'
:c-
L"
. -.
('l =- ""- ......... ....-......
".' .. ..........,..., '~JoI
~2 /-, .
. -
~;.
..
:~6'
-.
......
00
...:
......
...
...
n'
....
...
~~
~-
...
:... . ...:: . .:...:"..-:,-.:,,;
c;
..',.c
1 -".It... ..
i;
4bJi ~~
tUT: '$,.!; ~ .
":'~'f8
I .l...~.. .
J .'U'O-'.. ........
..
CO
..
i:
?J~O
.J:/JS
t.L1 "611
l 101
~I f6LJ'€i 0
-l!'J v
1,
.! J/!f
'~ !I r'6" 7
: , ~ 101
I~ L -'-
r- u.'u J ....If:.. I
I ~1-Jf15 ursg
l 101
.. ..
f
......... .....-.....
,-~..~..
z
101
r---
'1
I
~.: I
1::
{,-, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'--L.. ......... ...,..f .. ,..
I - .... .....".. .........w
.....~.... '..,,. ....-
I
/'
I
r
/
I
I
I
~.. l:n!:'~.~
S:l~i '"':':'il.::!';~.... ~31"'I".~":l~C:
] _",0(.'8 $
. ...k n --;--,..~-.......,=- .,..
I ..\ .!..::..~;.:::.:_:: .:... ..;...,.:: ::::.. J
/ "",.. - -
.~. ~.:::=:::~ .../
-.
..::::=~J
1 .1'"". C .. ___,.. ._. .._._._..
, I
MOZII )<)("l 'z(" "'S
dofY ,elt..,.;,,,,
'.JI;'
~'
"
v,
~
H
tJ:l
H
>'3
~
-
Ie
e
..
I
I
.'
\JS
6- Yo 6~ W'I'( ~8 l.r
6' C.I.S.P. . PlUC
40 l r. e" O.l.P.
12- x s' TEE
8~C. v, Ie BOX
8. rLUC Q P. l.
BIP>~U
S.AWCUl .AND REUOvt BIT.
R(IoOO'<1: SS '((T Of" TIl(
CURS AND cunER CENTER
MEOtAH. PA1CH ROAD YATCH
to (XISTl'~C CR.-OE
REPLACE Cl,JRB AND CuTlER
RA~US "'AleH 10 ()(ISllNC
flOMlIN(S.
,
2:
I '" .
! I I I \
l~\ I '"' /" .,
\~ V ~~.
~i\
I.,
.:~
.' :1
____I _'
-. - -..:. ---
. :::. ~
.'>, ~ '~-..... ..........'" ~~_J
" v--~, ~__;=-_
--~ --:r:=__-I- -
I
I
I
...... ___ --...1
.......
{};
-.:)'\
$~ I.
~
"l:
,-,
I \
I
I
I
......
..............."
\
\
\
'.......
......
~
..;
....
..
'"
~#
-?(/t;,/f~- 3-7
~...
e
I
''- :t
.i
PRELI~II
PRIMe.,; .s
BEING PART OF THE NORTH
OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF
R.20\.l. OF THE CITY OF ST
PREPARED FOR:
PRIME SITE INCOR
P.O. BOX 17 STILL
~~~DSED I'I.AT IS CURRENTLY ZONED II
sc T lACK RCOUIR[H(tn S . ~;
rRONT YARD. 40 fE[l f
SIDE VARI) 2D reCT rRO" ADJOINING II
40 rCEf rROH SIDE SfRu:r, OR V1THIII
ID rECT or SIDE PROPERn.lI"C 11m.
PROPOSED pROPERn IIlll iE SHUT D'
TOVARDS \JI'SllItrG1Ofl AVE. AUO CURVe
~@"J~
({;p~\::>
~~
~\("' ~./
<OJ"'?
'\,~
,/
,/ /
,/ ,/
''--/ ,/,/
.-/
11'
.......
11'....... ll'
.~
------
, ~
-_Ir..~_
-"'-
10\ I
I'LL P~OPOS(D 'OVL(VM~D TR(eS SHAll
KIN. I 112' DIA. BLB e 80' DC.
VARI( TICS SHAll BE AS......Pl( A"D 1I
~
.-1,
I
I
I
DESIGNER: CEDAf
604 \.IILSON AVI
SUI~VEYOI~:
\~D{O fOma
LEE VILLENEUV
RT 6 MENOMONIE
~
e
.
.
UV 5J~/J7b
MAGNUSON LAW FIRM
LICENSED IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING
333 NORTH MAIN STREET. SUITE #202 . P,O. Box 438 . STILLWATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE: (612) 439-9464. TELECOPIER: (612) 439-5641
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator; Steve Russell, Community Development Director; Sue
Fitzgerald, Assistant Community Development Director; Allen Zepper, Building Official;
Leo Miller, Stillwater Police Department; Cindy Jacobson, Animal Control Officer
David T. Magnuson, City Attorney ~
May 20, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Kennel Nuisance
I enclose for the information of the Council, a copy of a Complaint recently filed with the Washington
County Court charging an individual with operating a dog kennel as a nuisance. Presently this individual
holds a kennel license and the purpose of this memorandum is to request that the City Council give notice
to this person and schedule a hearing at the next regular Council Meeting for the revocation of this kennel
license. At the hearing, we will present evidence collected by the police department over a significant
period of time along with statements from offended neighbors, as well as photographs of the offending
conditions. If the Council sees fit to schedule such a hearing, we will give proper notice to the owner
as is required by law.
DTM/ds
Enclosure
District Court
_,mwa,er Ordinance Chap. 38.01
N3070
N
96202638
COURT CASE NO, DATE FILED
,......."....... ,--- - ......
. .........................
'. .........,.--.........."'..
<<.:..............,.................
o Amended ...
.......... ........
. . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. - . . . .
........'.. ._"....
..... .......-.......
........."...........
.,.,...........-...'....
..-... ,..". '. .
.......".. .....'.
o Tah.Charge Previously Filed
o if more than 6 counts (see attached) 0 if domestic assault
COMPLAINT SUMMONS
PROS ATTY PH: 612-439-9464
STATE OF MINNESOTA
PLAINTIFF,
MISDEMEANOR
VS.
NAME: first. middle. lest
Nancy Lucia Canning
71 7 Second Street South
Stillwater, MN 55082
Date of Binh
10/01/53
SJIS COMPLAINT NUMBER
82-11-1-028167
DEFENDANT.
WASHINGTON CTY
. .M. ..'~~~_~'m~_~~
.. " ~ :w4~i.:l:::f~~ . ...... . .~.... ~:l~
~~1tV;;-.;:~:'"S';..;:''*".3m
~im:" R.......~.: ~~.~ .~
COMPLAINT
The Complainant, being duly sworn, makes complaint to the above-named Court and states that there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant
committed the following offense(s}. The Complainant states that the following facts establish PROBABLE CAUSE:
That the defendant, Nancy Canning, has been operating a dog kennel out of her residence at 717 South Second Street in
thll' of Stillwater. The defendant's neighbors have reported to the Stillwater Police that the defendant has been breeding,
b , keeping, and offering for sale, Giant Schnauzers on their property at 717 South Second Street. It has been reported
th many as nine to fifteen dogs have been known to be Joarded and kept on the property at anyone time. After the
puppies are all sold, as many as four to five adult dogs remain on the property.
The defendant has maintained her kennel in such a way as to constitute a public nuisance under Stillwater Ordinance 38.01,
Subd. 12(1) and Subd. 13. Subd. 2(2) of the Ordinance provides that a nuisance shall include "any substance, matter, emission
or thing which creates a dangerous or unhealthy condition or which threatens the public peace, health, safety or sanitary
condition of the city or which is offensive or has a blighting influence on the community". Subd. 2(2)(h) of the Ordinance
further provides that animal feces must be disposed of in a clean and sanitary manner.
The defendant has not removed the dog feces from her yard. The dogs are allowed out of the kennel into the back yard
of the property. Over the course of several months dog feces has accumulated and none of it has been removed or disposed
of. The feces has putrefied and has become part of the ground. The property has been visually inspected by Officer Leo Miller
and by Community Service Officer Cindy Jacobson of the Stillwater Police Department and they discovered the back yard
portion of the property to be covered with dog feces. The feces was observed to be decaying and much of it was covered with
mold and mildew. The officers also found the odors of feces and urine to be oppressive, even when standing on adjacent
property.
The presence of dog feces on the property has created an unhealthy condition which threatens the health and sanitary
condition of the neighborhood. The odors coming from the property are persistent and offensive to neighbors. In addition
this condition has a blighting influence on the surrounding community.
Fit
REV. 4/95
\
,
e
II~
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th St.
Stillwater, MN 55043
Attention City Clerk:
West Publishing Company
610 Opperman Drive
P.O. Box 64526
St. Paul, MN 55164-D526
(612)687-7000
May 9, 1996
We are requesting an additional handicapped spot for West Publishing Company located at 201 W. 2nd St.,
either out on the street or across in the public lot.
Please notify me if this will be possible or if you have any questions or concerns, I can be reached at 687-
7798.
e
Sincerely,
~. TPUBLI.SHIN;:;JCO PANY
., 1
.. JA('
Jon R. Durand
Supervisor
Engineering & Facilities
(
.,..
'- ~ PRINTED DN RECYCLED PAPER
r
I
(C? ~ r2 0 "/7 I:~ I' -
1.5 ~ I.S u c':'
:",AY - 9 1996
e
:';..........~~"'-.rt+r.
L
May 3, 1996
City Administrator/
Stillwater City Council
216 N 4th St.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Dear Members of the Council:
As Chairman of the Stillwater Memorial Day Association I wish to
inform you that it is our intentions to have our annual Memorial
Day Program on Monday, May 27, 1996 at Lowell Park - 11:00 A.M.
Prior to the start of the program we will have a short parade from
the Family Services parking lot (just So. of City Hall) down to
Lowell Park. It is our hope that we can get the Police Dept to
help us with traffic control during the short march to the park.
This shouldn't take over 15 minutes. We would also like to request
that members of the City Park staff make sure that the park is as
clean as possible prior to our program. Lastly I we would
appreciate it if the U.S. flag is up and flying at half-mast that
whole day.
Our parade route will be the same as it has been in past years. It
will start at the Family Services parking lot and end up in the
park. We're assuming that the only way these plans would change
would be if the high water in the park area fails to go down.
Good communication and cooperation should help assure that we
continue the fine tradition of hono~ing the veterans who served our
country and have now passed away.
Each and everyone of you are invited to attend this community
program.
{
Respectfully,
w~- Lj~
William Gregurich
Chrmn. Stillwater Memorial Day Association
Stillwater American Legion, VFW, DAV & Auxiliaries
e
'"
\
\
,
e
Date:
May 8, 1996
To:
Stillwater City Council
From:
Mark alien
Subject:
Storm Sewer Utility Charge
On May 2, I spoke with the Stillwater City Administrator regarding the quarterly charge
for storm sewer usage of $4.50. After explaining my situation to him, he suggested that I
write to the City Council so that this matter may be considered at the meeting later this
month.
I live with my family at 2285 Orwell Court, just off of County Highway 11. This is the
northern extreme of the city and is not served, directly or indirectly, by the City of
Stillwater's storm sewer system. Our rain run-off flows down the St. Croix bluff and
through culverts under County Highway 11 and State Highway 95 to the St. Croix River.
These culverts are maintained by the county and state respectively.
Since rain run-off from our property and those adjacent to ours, does not enter the city
storm sewer system, I believe it is not appropriate that I should pay for its use or
maintenance. Please reconsider charging me for this city service.
7?~~
::
ie
STAll FARM
A
INSURANCE"
~
c-e 5(ZI /9 ~ J
\ )
ROBERT E SAFE
Auto-Life-Health-Home and Business
305 S GREELEY
STILLWATER, MN 55082 PHONE (612) 439-0383 FAX 439-0756
e
May 7, 1996
Dear Mayor Kimball,
The Taste of Stillwater is moving along nicely. Everything is in place
and the bids are in. Port-a-potties will cost us $802. Since this
is a new event, will the city be willing to pick up the cost? Please
contact me during the day at 439-0383, or in the evening at 430-1089
to discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
~, S'yl-
Bob Safe
Taste of Stillwater Chairman
el
: I
11,1 ill III 1,1" III J, Ii, ~'l hi III illill'IIIIII,II.1I1111 dilIIIJII,L~d,~1 Illi ~III~ .11~1!llill~IISi'IlI~llil~illiiI:l!l!!ll.ili1~iillIWiJ.llltlt:l::i.~:ml!IlI~Iii,~~ihi1"I~..w~i11I,~III,~~I~"~I~UilIUlI'li~I,~II~11 all;~I,~I,il.IU~~IIJI"'liill.II~,llll~lJ 1~.li~=lliIlllli&laJdl&.iliJ.IIIW:ll~~~iIl !,I:I~IIIIIIi,~~Uj.Ii\lMiol!I.Llli,!~~rJjll!.t.I~~~Ui..~~~:
e
e
11
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Honorable Jay Kimble and Stillwater City Council
Stillwater City Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082-4898
Dear Mayor Kimble and Members of the City Council,
14 May 1996
The purpose of this letter is to support retaining Katherine B. Francis on the Stillwater
Heritage Preservation Commission. During her five years on the Heritage Preservation
Commission, Katherine has provided an important perspective and much wisdom regarding
historic preservation to fellow Commissioners and the general public which she serves.
Katherine brings to the Commission over twenty years of experience as a real estate agent
specializing in historic houses; it is just this kind of background that we wish all of our
heritage preservation commissions could benefit from.
I strongly urge you to allow Katherine to continue her service on the Heritage Preservation
Commission, for the benefit of Stillwater's heritage.
Sincerely,
~,",\4 ~
Michael Koop
Historic Preservation Program Specialist
State Historic Preservation Office
345 KELLOGG BOULEVARD WEST / SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102-1906/ TELEPHONE: 612-296-6126
05/14/96 15:54
"0"612 490 2150
SEH ST.PAlIL
.
~ 0001/0001 I
post-ir Fax Note
To lNlN tiff.
Co.ltlePl.
7671
, .
e
Co.
Phone . Phone I
Fau " 1 Cf ... 0 r FllX It
May 14, 1996
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Honorable Mayor and Council:
A valuable member of our Heritage Preservation Commission, Katherine Francis,
has recently moved from the City to Stillwater Township. She, as a downtown business owner
and Realtor, offer a unique perspective and valuable inpul in our review of downtown signage and
building facade reviews.
;.;
1 request that you consider that she remain on the commission as an exception to the residence requirement
of the ordinance.
C.~
Sii/c j L
1:ti. Johnson
HPC Member
c:K.B.Ftancis
I
I
I
ei
;-
W ASIDNGTON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GOVERNMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH. STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082-0006
612-430-6000 Facsimile '612-430-6017
~ &@&DD!7r;?ftc,'
,'~Y . -:,'; j
-', .... 9/996
Dennis C. Hagberg
District 1
Mary Hauser
District 2
Wally Abrahamson
District 3
Myra Peterson
District 4
Dave Engstrom
District 51Chair
May 7, 1996
Dear Community Official:
Washington County is hosting a forum to discuss growth options for the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area. A report was recently published by the Metropolitan Council which
delineated three options for growth. We have scheduled a speaker from the Metropolitan
Council to come to this forum to provide us with an overview of the growth options report.
In addition, we will have a representative from the Builder's Association of the Twin Cities
present their reaction to the growth options report, as well as provide an overview of their report
called "The High Cost of Sprawl". It is an urban land supply analysis, and provides
recommendations from their point of view for managing growth in the Twin Cities Area.
We would like to have you or representatives from your community attend and participate in this
important forum concerning growth in our metropolitan area.
This forum is scheduled for May 28, 1996 at 4:00 p.m. in the Washington County Board Room
in Stillwater. Since space is limited, please contact Linda at 430-6000 to reserve a place.
Washington County, as a member of the seven county metropolitan area, continues to play an
important role in influencing decisions on growth in this area. We would like your input and
insight on creating a better environment for our communities tomorrow. Hope to see you at this
important forum.
Sincerely,
~~
Dave Engstrom, Chair
Washington County Board of Commissioners
I ~ Ipr
P'Itn." an Recyded Papef
EaUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
@
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
204 NORTH THIRD STREET
STI LLWATER,M INNESOTA 55082
e
BOARD MEMBERS:
JOHN L. JEWELL. PRESIDENT
MELVIN FRIEDRICH
JAMES S. O'BRIEN
DENNIS McKEAN
Secretary/Manager
May 13" 1996
Mayor Kimble & Council
216 North Fourth street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Mr. !-!ayor & Council,
Jack Jewell's current term on the Board of Water Commissioners expires June 30" 1996.
He has expressed his willingness to again serve on the Board.
It is the desire of the Board, to ask for Mr. Jewell's reappointment, as a member of
the Board of Water Commissioners.
Sincerely,
~-L""t) l7%/~~
ennis McKean
DM/ dm
e
,
e
Ie
I
Denise E. Carlson
1101 Parkwood Lane
Stillwater, MN 55082
351-9482 (home)
297-3874 (work)
April 9, 1996
Stillwater City Council
216 N. 4th St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
~!EClEu\#!E[)
APW 1 1 1996
Dear Council Members:
I have learned from Louise Watson, a current member of the Stillwater Human Rights
Commission, that there is or soon will be a vacancy on that board. I would like to offer
my application to become a member of the Stillwater Human Rights Commission.
My husband, 17-year-old daughter and I moved to Stillwater in December of 1995. It has
been a long-term goal of ours to live in this city, to which we have felt drawn for many
years. Now that we are settled, I would like to become part of the community and get
involved in something where I can be of service.
In my present job as manager of the Reference Department at the Minnesota Historical
Society, I have had the opportunity to build a diverse workforce and to foster a work
environment in which everyone feels accepted and productive. For four years now, we
have maintained a goal of having a 10% of our statf members come from populations of
color. I also serve on the Society's ADA advisory committee and am responsible for
making sure that the Society's library meets all accessibility requirements.
Like Louise, I am a member of the Bahai Faith. Bahais believe strongly in the concept of
the oneness of mankind, that all races are equal in the sight of God. We celebrate and
work to promote unity in diversity.
I am excited about the possibility of becoming a part of Stillwater's human rights efforts
and being able to contribute something to a community of which I already feel a part.
I have enclosed a copy of my current resume for your information. I look forward to
hearing from you in the event that there is an opening on the Commission.
~inCerelY,
f ~~t. ~~'tM.J
enise E. Carlson
DENISE E. CARLSON
1101 P ARKWOOD LANE
STILLWATER, MN 55082
612/351-9482 (HOME)
612/297-3874 (WORK)
e
CAREER HISTORY
Head of Reference, Minnesota Historical Society, Saint Paul, MinnesotaJanuary 1992 - present
Administrative Responsibilities:
· Overall responsibility for the Minnesota Historical Society's Research Center program.
This includes public reference services, patron instruction, program promotion, materials
retrieval and storage, and Copy Center operations
· Manage a department of 30 full and part-time staff
. Draft and administer a budget in excess of $700,000.00
· Develop new sources of revenue through grant applications and creation of income-
producing activities
· Work toward the larger goals of the Society through collaboration with other departments,
most notably the Education, Exhibits, and Historic Sites programs
· Plan for long-range goals of the Department
· Establish annual workplan based on priorities of the Society and long-range Department
goals
· Secure resources necessary to complete the Department's workplan
Personnel Management Responsibilities:
· Supervise 13 full-time direct reports
· Overall responsibility' for recruiting, hiring, training, motivating and evaluating all
Department staff
· Schedule staff working the public reference desks
· Build a more diverse staff ;.
· Establish and maintain a unified, productive work environment
Public Service Responsibilities:
· Work approximately eight hours per week on the public reference desks, including turns
in Thursday evening and Saturday rotations
· Teach public mini-classes which introduce patrons to the Research Center and its
collections
· Conduct special tours and orientation sessions for professional groups, the public and
other MHS staff
· Handle specialized requests, complaints and difficult patron encounters with the goal of
creating a win-win situation: fully meet the patron's needs within the legal and resource
constraints of the Institution
Public Relations Responsibilities:
· Promote the use of the collections within the Society, to its members and to the public at
large
· Identify groups who would most benefit from the Research Center program and
concentrate marketing efforts in these areas
· Reach a more culturally and ethnically diverse clientele
· Market the Research Center program statewide
ei
Denise Carlson/ Page 2
e
. Develop networks with similar historical and information-based organizations and
collaborate on resource-sharing
wherever possible
Specific Accomplishments:
. Successfully supervised the move of the Society's collections to its new headquarters
. Built a single reference services team out of two staffs which had been physically,
administratively and philosophically separate for nearly 20 years
. Implemented a new, centralized reference program
. Increased number of patrons by 68% in first year of operation in the new Research Center
facility
Specific Accomplishments continued:
'. Initiated orientation sessions for first-time users and students; resurrected mini-class
program
· Initiated a quarterly patron newsletter
. Spearheaded use of volunteers in the Research Center; went from 0 to 40 volunteers in
two years
. Expanded Department internship program; now have a full complement of interns every
term
. Streamlined retrieval and Copy Center support services
. Established partnerships with Metronet, the Metropolitan multi-type library network, and
CALCO, the Capitol Area
Library Cooperative
. Restructured Reference Department to increase clerical staff, thus freeing up professional
staff time for more direct patron contact
. Conducted first patron survey in twelve years and organized first-ever Research Center
focus groups
. Used data from survey and focus groups as basis for a strategic planning process for the
Department
Reference Services Supervisor, James J. Hill Reference Library, Saint Paul, MinnesotaSeptember
1988 - January 1992
Administrative Responsibilities:
. Worked closely with Head of Public Services to plan for needs of Reference Services
Section
. Scheduled desk and off-desk hours of eight professional librarians with goal of
maximizing service to public while at the same time facilitating the completion of other
reference-related projects
. Developed, implemented and monitored a staffing resources survey
. Drafted the Reference Services Section annual budget
. Chaired the Reference Services meetings; chaired and served on several inter-
departmental task forces
e Personnel Management Responsibilities:
. Screened and interviewed candidates for Reference Staff positions; made hiring
recommendations to Head of Public Service and Executive Director
. Designed and implemented a training program for new Reference Staff members
Denise Carlson/ Page 3
· Supervised work of Collection Development, Extended Reference and Online Searching
Coordinators
· Scheduled regular continuing education opportunities for staff, including monthly visits e
to other libraries and attendance at conferences and workshops
· Carried out annual performance evaluations and quarterly performance updates for all
Reference Staff members
Public Service Responsibilities:
· Designed and implemented the division of reference service into separate in-house and
telephone operations
· Worked regular shifts at the reference desk and performed extended reference searches
· Selected materials in the subject areas of management and human resources development
Public Relations Responsibilities:
· Coordinated production of in-house publications, including bibliographies and brochures,
client newsletter and Index to Minnesota Business Periodicals
· Coordinated in-house tours and external speaking engagements by Reference Staff
members; made presentations to numerous professional and educational groups
· Developed a survey of client needs
· Initiated the practice of quality control call-backs for Extended Reference and Online
Searching operations
· Initiated Saturday student orientation tours
· Maintained contacts with public and academic libraries, as well as business and
community groups
Reference Librarian, James J. Hill Reference Library, Saint Paul, MinnesotaSeptember 1975 -
August 1988
Reference and Information Services Duties:
· Provided telephone and in-person reference service in business, commerce and related
subject areas
· Performed online searches using DIALOG, BRS and DOW JONES
· Developed in-house reference tools, including a subject guide to the libraries' periodicals
collection
· Used IBM-PC word processing and file management programs
· Kept track of reference statistics
· Scheduled desk hours for reference staff members and trained and supervised student
aides
· Co-developed and served as first coordinator of Extended Reference service
· Participated in selection of materials and collection maintenance activities
Public Relations Duties:
· Made presentations about Hill Library to numerous groups and classes
· Coordinated Library's booth at the Small Business Marketplace for three years
· Designed and compiled brochures and booklists
· Served as Acting Head of Public Services, February - June 1987
e
DeniSe Carlson/ Page 4
e
Graduate Library Assistant, MINITEX Reference Services, University of MinnesotaSeptember
1975 - December 1975
. Answered research questions referred by public and academic libraries throughout the
State
. Served as temporary Head of MINITEX Reference Service, October - December 1975
EDUCATION
. M.A., Library-Science, University of Minnesota, March 1976
. B.A., Sociology, University of Minnesota, June 1971
. Continuing education credits in management and marketing of library services through
Special Libraries Association and the Minnesota Libraries Association
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
. Special Libraries Association, served as Membership Chair and Director of Minnesota
Chapter
. Women Historians of the Midwest
· Midwest Archives Conference
. Capitol Area Libraries Cooperative, served as treasurer 1993-95
PuBLICATIONS
. "James J. Hill Reference Library - Help for the Small Business," in Home- Based and
Small Business Network, v. 3, no. 2, April/May/June 1989
. Book reviews in the "Business/Twin Cities" section of the St. Paul Pioneer Press
. Indexes to The Gold Book, a directory of Twil) Cities' advertising and public relations
firms and The Brown Book, a directory of TWIn Cities' architectural and engineering firms
for use in doing reference work at Hill
. Review of White Captives: Gender and Ethnicity on the American Frontier, by June
Narnias, for WHOM Newsletter, 1994
References available upon request.
e
.~...--
: (~
, '-~~
--.---.-- ---, ---.~ --~~,
.....,-".
'J.3q'llkl4.tf~J,(.)/; ,
oaidale ~AI 51 /~,
t.. UtJ. ) '77'1--0 7J ~
L/~3o,Aift
e
~ ~'fl/I ruIe~ C; (;;ana!
;I ~ lmh jp 1i1/J,;., r- cJI-
~ r;~;h~ -- ir~ i11- lie. S/;/lva~
7fJ~w1-aJ1- /(,/- ~ C,h1 m/aftfYL "
/b!/htJ 1- ('V"( i)1. 6dfi-dak,l L
5erv-ed rk ~..,;jsid>7 J-h I,!~ -/fLi'
IJm4l iftJltkJ /;k, n <ff!:r- tJ>'L at- ~
1 Ik- f/1/tJ sftl~ {JelfJf;-6>J,{' .
1- .-4vt ~ serv'/1 wI/-;( ~
rpUf anJ ~ w;i( hI/M
C-pn.!/der, t/J (,).e, j dI (/IV
fz> ccn~~ t{ e. .tf?1-,
· Jf:ttr''{ fri;-/
--,
e
,
I
To: \
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Rich Cummings, Council Member
Eric Thole, Council Member
Terry Zoller, Council Member
Gene Bealka, Council Member
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
Stillwater Evening Gazette, Editor
May 15, 1996
e
I have been reflecting on the proceedings of the May 7th public hearing on the
sidewalk proposal and the Eagle Ridge Trail residents' input. I would like to make a
few more comments.
First, I would like to thank Mr. Eckles and his staff for completing the sidewalk
feasibility study. Although the project will not go forth, I believe it was important to
complete this step. When I reviewed our original petition of Spring, 1995, many of
the comments mentioned the need for sidewalks and/or bikepaths, so I do not believe
this was a misguided effort. Residents voiced their opposition to sidewalks for a
variety of reasons--the cost, liability, effort to shovel and maintain, and disruption of
landscaping. I acknowledge these comments but continue to believe that the safety of
our residents, especially the children, would be enhanced if they had a place to walk,
jog, rollerblade, and bike separate from a narrow, curvy, and busy road.
Second, anyone who believes that Rich Cummings isn't working hard enough for us is
simply misinformed, or perhaps hasn't been involved in our efforts from the start.
Rich has been behind us all the way and has probably been the only one pushing to
try the various suggestions, even when experts say they won't work. I know Rich is
working innumerable hours on a variety of projects for the improvement of our entire
community and he can not be thanked enough for his commitment to our concerns.
Rich hit the nail on the head when he reminded' all of us of why this project was
initiated--for the safety of our children and all residents. Perhaps residents came to
the May 7th public hearing for other concerns. We began this effort in 1995 in the
spirit of identifying mutual goals with the city and county staff and working together
to find solutions. We have all felt frustrations along the way. However, I sincerely
hope that we don't stray from our original course--safety for our children. In our
original petition, residents also mentioned slower speeds, speed limit signs, stop signs,
caution signs, speed bumps, strategically located bike paths, and pavement markings
as other possibilities for addressing our problem. I urge our city staff to go forth with
these actions, as Rich, once again, recommended on Tuesday night.
Thank you for providing us with a forum to voice our concerns, and for the effort you
have already put into investigating solutions. Let's continue to work together.
Ie
Sincerely,
~~C} I-I()~
Amy Hoolgy cJ
640 Eagle Ridge Trail
e
....saJ
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE. 200 SEH CENTER. ST. PAUL. MN 55110 612490-2000 800 325.2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTA nON
May I, 1996
RE:
City of Stillwater, Minnesota
Downtown Reconstruction Project LI#257
r2 ~ r::-::: n ..:, -; ;:~ ~
lS ~ L.5 ..: }',!,\
:1
. 2 \.......-
- ~:::o ,:: Ii
\&
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
!1g~~~""'S'.";'~; .
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We have recently been trying to finalize discussions with City staff regarding fees we've earned during the
Downtown Reconstruction project. Because this project was an improvement of significant magnitude in
a historic downtown central business district, it required more time and special attention than many projects.
Previous city councils took great personal interest in the project due to the historic nature of Stillwater.
Decisions were often possible only after long and extensive study and consideration by the council and
committees representing various public interests.
The Downtown Plan was the product of eighteen months of study that began in mid 1986. The final product
is considerably different from early visions because of financial and other constraints. As designers of the
facilities we worked closely with city representatives and often had to make changes quickly as the project
took form.
There were four different city councils involved in helping shape this project. With a fifth council currently
in place we have requested the opportunity to make a pre!entation to the council in workshop session. We
feel it is important to discuss those issues that impacted the cost of the work so everyone has a good
understanding of all that was involved. To date we have not had a positive response or support for our
request from the staff. This letter is, in part, directed at trying to establish a time when we can meet in such
a session and discuss the issues.
We appreciate the time the city staff has spent with us. The issues surrounding the downtown project are
numerous and complicated. There have been an unusual number of people involved in making decisions.
The staff is in a position of having to rely on us for much of the information on which to judge our fee
request because some of them were not involved in the project.
I hope you can appreciate how we feel about our relationship with the City of Stillwater. We have been your
engineering consultants for a long time. We look on our relationship with the city as one of partnership
rather than one of client and consultant. We have tried to respond to your staff in that manner and I trust they
would agree with me.
Ie
I
Our estimate of the final cost of engineering services on the downtown project in June, 1994, was
$1,456,331. We eliminated almost $68,000 of that amount at that time because we felt there was some
duplication of efforts over various portions of the project. In February, 1995, we discussed our fee request
in detail with city staff and responded to their concerns about certain issues by reducing our request another
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON ING.
MINNEAPOLIS. MN
S1: CLOUD. MN
CHIPPEWA FALLS. WI
MADISON. WI
LAKE COUNTY. IN
EOUAl OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
e
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Page 2
May 1, 1996
$53,170. We have approached our discussions with staff in a completely open manner and have provided
documentation of all amounts being requested. We have tried to settle all issues to the city's benefit. To
date we have reduced our original fee figures by over $120,000.
The City's offer as presented in Mr. Kriesel's March 28, 1996, letter to SEH suggests a final payment to SEH
that asks us to accept another $88,516 reduction in our fees. This is a significant amount of money to us and
the reasons for such a discount of our fees has not been made clear. We want to be sure we understand the
city's concerns and we also would like a chance to present infonnation we feel is pertinent to the many
complications of the downtown project. That is why we are requesting a chance to meet with the council
at a workshop session.
There are other important issues we believe should be discussed. One relates to establishing a process of
communication with the city that assures we both have a clear understanding ofthe work to be done. The
process should provide documentation of the understanding. A part of the difficulties we encountered on
the downtown project involved receiving instructions from a variety of sources and not knowing if the person
had the necessary authority to issue the instructions. During some of the most critical points in the
downtown project many decisions and instructions were verbal and poorly documented other than in our
project records. We would like to work with the city council and staff to develop a communications process
that will eliminate misunderstandings.
We appreciate your consideration of our request to meet with you at a workshop session and will await your
response. We have always found that direct communications can greatly increase understanding.
Sincerely,
...;,
OJ
Donald E. Lund, P .E.
Chainnan and CEO
.r_
., ,
c:Ni1e'Kriesel
Diane Deblon
Klayton Eckles
e
"
7545 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE · EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55H4-36H · 612-942-7559 . FAX: 612.941-5492
COMMERCIAL
PROPERTIES
INcOAP~~~iP26, 1996
Mayor Jay Kimble
City Council Members
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re: Stillwater Marketplace/On Sale Liquor License
Dear Mayor Kimble and Councilmembers,
New City Commercial Properties, Inc. is marketing the excess land around the Cub and
Target Stores in Stillwater, known as Stillwater Marketplace. They have experienced interest
from firms, both local and national, who would like to develop a full service sit down
restaurant serving liquor on subject land, however, when they investigate the unavailability
of "on sale" liquor licenses in Stillwater, they move on.
One example of this is Applebees, which as you know built a new restaurant facility on the
south side of Highway 36 in Oak Park Heights. We had a verbal agreement with them at
roughly the same land price they ended up paying. Another lost sale was for a four acre
tract to a national cinema group. They wanted to develop a large cinema facility, however,
their economics required them to also develop pr sell land to accommodate a full service
sit down restaurant serving liquor. When a liqu'or license wasn't available to them, they
withdrew their interest. Stillwater is missing potential tax base income and the owners, are
missing land sales.
S', I
Through this letter, Dayton Hudson Corporation and Supervalu Holdings, as land owners,
request you include on your November 1996 ballot, a referendum allowing the city to issue
up to three on sale liquor licenses for the Stillwater Marketplace project.
We will greatly appreciate your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ie
NEW CITY COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC.
~~~+-~?e
Jo . Nelson, Jr.
JF rb
049606.TST
~
IlRniBqts of @lllumhus
e
STILLWATER COUNCIL, No. 1632
1910 South Greeley Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
April 30. 1996
Stillwater City Council
Stillwater City Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Council Members
On March 31, 1996, your city planner sent us a letter requesting us to remove our sign because of
noncompliance with the city ordinance, We need your help in obtaining a variance on the city sign
ordinance,
Our organization offers Bingo to the residence of the St. Croix Valley Area on Friday night. Because of
our limited budget, the only effective means to advertise with the community has been this sign. The sign
has brought in around 50% of our customers.
.;..
What we would like to offer is, that the sign would go up on Thursday night and come down after Bingo
on Friday night. During the heavy snows and rains in January the sign was frozen in place. That is why
it never moved until the thaw of March. If the sign freezes in place next year, we ,..ill inform the City
Council sooner.
Thank you for considering this action. It means a lot to our council and our customers.
e
".,
"
--
.
'~
.'P
Friends of Long Lake Homeo'wners Association, Inc.
2946 Marine Circle, Stillwater, MN 55082
Citv Council
City of Stilhvater
216 North 4 tit Street
Stillwater, ~IN 55082
"ia fax & mail
May 7, 1996
Info. cc
Nile KrieseL Klayton Eckles
Metro D\"R
Oak Park Heights
Ba)'towll
Lake Elmo
Grant TO\\11Ship
Stillwater TO\\TIship
Dear Stilhvater City Council,
Weare ""Titing on behalf of our Homeo\\ners Association, incorporated on May 3, 1996.
The primary purpose of our association is to work with the jurisdictions in the Long Lake
watershed to assure that our homes and Browns Creek maintain the same, or better, level of safety
as intended in the 1976 DNR outlet design.
Weare pleased that the City of Stillwater has funded a watershed system study to address
the issues and constraints in further development of the Long Lake watershed. We believe that a
successful outcome will require the acceptance of all jurisdictions, the DNR, and those of us who
live next to the Lake. For this reason, we ask that the City adopt a Study Advisory Committee
composed of representatives from the above parties. The committee would serve to review the
study plan, and to provide development plans and inputs from the jurisdictions, constraints or
issues important to the DNR, and needs of the homeowners. The committee would also review
draft results before completion. We believe that solutions can be found, and that use of the
steering committee will reduce last minute issues, and assure that the results are accepted by all.
. I
We believe that the Browns Creek WMO cannot fully provide this function due to its
limited monthly meetings, non attendance by some jurisdictions, and the uncertainty raised by the
pending request to disband. However, the WMO members may be appropriate candidates for the
advisory committee. Finally, we recently learned that Lake Elmo has as much as several hundred
acres tributary to the Lake which must be considered in the study. We encourage their
involvement.
Our association asks that you contact the appropriate parties to solicit their involvement in
the study. Please provide a response confiIming your intentions to use an advisory committee.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
David Fabio, Edward J..Gordon
e
Ie
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FR:
City Coordinator
RE:
Permits related to water use activity
."
DA: May 17, 1996
"-
Di~siDn:
Accompanying this memo is letter from Jim Frank, Washington County Sheriff, regarding a
permit process for the City of Stillwater for water related activities (such as slalom courses, boat
racing, water ski shows, placement of docks/structures, etc.) that may be requested from time to
time. Sheriff Frank is asking whether or not the City would be interested in establishing a permit
application process in addition to the process established by Washington County.
The County has jurisdiction over the issuance of permits but would use the City process (which
would involve a public hearing) in their decision making process. I am not sure if it is necessary
to establish such a process because the County has done a good job in this area in the past and it
would add to the workload of the Council and staff. However, there may be times that a public
hearing process might be helpful in determining whether a permit should be issued.
I can discuss this further with you at the meeting Tuesday.
Recommendation:
Council consider establishing permit application process for water related activities.
~~
e
.
.
,~
STILLWATER TOWNSHIP
Box 117
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
May 13, 1996
~.~)W,,,,.,,,,,.,,
Mr. Niles Kriesel
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth st.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Mr. Michael J. Robertson
City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
P.O. Box 2007
14168 57 Street North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Ms. Mary Kueffner
City of Lake Elmo
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
City of Hugo
5524 N. Upper 146th Street
Hugo, MN 55038
Mr. Gary Erichson
Chairman, Town of Grant
8599 105th street
Mahtomedi, MN 55115
Washington County Soil & Water
Conservation District
1825 Curve Crest Boulevard
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Pat st. Clair
Bay town Township
14949 North 4th Street
stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Linda Klien, Clerk
May Township
12328 May Avenue North
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Barb Ohman
Board of.Water
One West Water
st. Paul, MN
and Soil Resources
Street
55107
Subject: stillwater Town Board Position, Re: the BCWMO
1. The Stillwater Town Board of Supervisors supports the
existence and functioning of the Brown's Creek Water Management
Organization. Further, we support the process for enhancement
of the current Joint Powers Agreement.
2. The Stillwater Town Board is committed to the success of
the BCWMO and its mission to oversee surface water management
in the watershed.
3. The Town Board is highly interested in enhancing the
authority of the WMO under the Joint Powers Agreement so that
it can function more effectively to solve the increasing problems
in the watershed related to flooding, highwater, water quality
and the presures on water resources that additional land
development will exert.
4. The Stillwater Town Board intends to fund its fair share
of costs to support their efforts to create a second generation
watershed management plan, to contract with engineering firms
to undertake required watershed studies and emergency projects
* Printed on Recycled Paper
Ma y 1 3, 1 996
Page 2
and to support an efficient and effective administrative
structure.
5. The Town Board is not in favor of the creation of a watershed
district to replace the BCWMO. One of the primary reasons for
this is our desire to retain our responsibility and authority
in the watershed and to have direct representation in matters
of district, regional and local watershed importance.
6. The Stillwater Town Board intends to actively support and
fund the ongoing work of the BCWMO to manage surface and ground
water quality in the Brown's Creek watershed.
Sincerely yours,
~~~~~ Ks
Jack Takemoto, Chair
DF/ks
10..
e
.
.
.
.
.
""
--
;@
ti~AY 2 0 1996
LAW OFFICES OF
ECKBERG, LAMMERS, BRIGGS, WOLFF Be VIERLING, P.L
<.;~~J<',A.>""
183S NORTHWESTERN AVENUE
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
(612) 439-2676
FAX (612) 439-2923
LYLE.J. ECKBERG
.JAMES F. LAMMERS
ROBERT G. BRIGGS
PAUL A. WOLFF
MARK .J. VIERLING
GREGORY G. GALLER
KEVIN K. SHOEBERG
THOMAS .J. WEIDNER
SUSAN D. OLSON
DAVID K. SNYDER
May 17, 1996
Mr. Michael J. Robertson
City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
P.O. Box 2007
14168 57th Street North
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Mr. Bob Museus
City Administrator
City of Hugo City Hall
5524 Upper 146th Street
Hugo, MN 55038
Mr. Tracy Mazenac
c/o Tamarack Gallery
112 South Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Mr. Niles Kriesel
City of Stillwater
v/ 216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Pat Bantli
Stillwater Township
P.O. Box 117
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Pat St. Clair
Bay town Township
14949 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ms. Mary Kueffner
City of Lake Elmo
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
In Re:
Browns Creek Watershed Management Organization
Greetings!
I want to keep everyone up to date as to the status of
Grant Township's request that all communities determine whether
they would like the Browns Creek Watershed Management Organization
to remain as is or to be replaced by a Watershed District. I have
been informed that the City of Oak Park Heights voted on May 13,
1996 that it would prefer to have the Watershed Management
Organization disbanded and replaced by a Watershed District.
I have not yet heard any response from the City of Lake
Elmo, the City of Stillwater or Bay town Township, however, of the
other 5 communities in the Browns Creek WMO only one (Stillwater
Township) has any opposition of the formation of a District.
...
May 17, 1996
Page 2
.
I
Lake Elmo,
provide any
know.
look forward to receiving r~ponses from the City of
City of Stillwater an9---BcfYtown Tow hip. If I can
assistance or infor Xlon, 0 any of u, please let me
GGG: smp
c: Deb Graul
Grant Town Board
Mark Vierling
Bob Briggs
Tom Scott
Dace Magnuson
Jerry Filla
.
..1
*
E;f
Water&Soil
Resources
~~
One West Water Street
Suite 200
SI. Paul, MN 55107
(612) 296-3767
Fax (612) 297-5615
Field Offices
Northern Region:
394 S. Lake Avenue
Room 403
Duluth, MN 55802
(218) 723-4752
Fax (218) 723-4794
3217 Bemidji Avenue N.
Bemidji, MN 56601
(218) 755-4235
Fax (218) 755-4201
217 S. 7th Street
Suite 202
Brainerd, MN 56401-3660
(218) 828-2383
Fax (218) 828-6036
Southern Region:
Highway 15 S.
Box 756
New Ulm, MN 56073
(SOn 359-6074
Fax (SOn 359-6018
40-16th Street SE
Suite A
Rochester, MN 55904
(SOn 285-7458
Fax (SOn 280-2875
Box 267
1400 E, Lyon Street
Marshall, MN 56258
(SOn 537-6060
Fax (Son 537-6368
Metro Region:
One West Water Street
Suite 250
SI. Paul, MN 55107
(612) 282.9969
Fax (612) 297-5615
'equal opportunity employer
rinted on recycled paper
May 10, 1996
FYI
RlEClEllVlElDJ
MAY 1 5 1996
Mr. Klayton Eckles, Chair -------------
Brown's Creek Watershed Management Organization (BCWMO)
c/o Washington Soil and Water Conservation District
1825 Curve Crest Boulevard, Suite 101
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Final Report - Kismet Basin Dispute Resolution Request
Dear Mr, Eckles:
Attached you will find the Board of Water and Soil Resources Final Staff
Report in the matter of the request for dispute resolution assistance from the
BCWMO relating to the Kismet Basin flooding, I am also sending, by copy of
this letter, the final report to the attached list of affected and interested parties.
Some minor changes have been made to the April 30, 1996 draft to incorporate
input and discussion from the interested parties, including discussion during the
May 6 meeting. In order that you will not have to reread the entire report, the
changes are in boldface type.
I plan to attend the May 15, 1996 board meeting of the BCWMO, I
understand that this meeting will also serve as the public meeting to develop a
formal course of action in response to the aforementioned report, in accordance
with :MN Rules Chapter 8410.0180, Subp, 3(C), Therefore, I will be available to
answer questions or provide assistance in the BCWMO's decision process.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide assistance in this matter. I
realize that the outcome and recolnmendations in the report are along a different
tack than your board had anticipated, We are hopeful that an effective, long-term
solution to the Kismet flooding problem as well as the overall water management
in the Brown's Creek watershed will result from this course of action. If! can be
of any further assistance, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 297-1894.
",
S;~. rreell~Y,. I 1 hI/J
~~ UJ. 0C1~
Barbara W. Ohman
Metro Board Conservationist
Attachment: Final Staff Report
c:
List ofInterested Parties
Select BWSR Staff
In the Matter of the Request
for Dispute Resolution Assistance from the
Brown's Creek Watershed Management
Organization Relating to the Kismet Basin
Flooding, Washington County
BCWMO Members
David Francis, Stillwater Township
David Schaaf, Oak Park Heights
Klayton Eckles, Stillwater
David Truax, Hugo
Art Welander, Grant Township
Rebecca Johnson, May Township
Michelle Ulrich, Attorney
Grant Township
Gary Erichson, Chair
Art Welander (sent c/o BCWMO)
Pamela Magadance
Debbie Graul, Town Clerk
Gregory Galler, Town Attorney
Kismet Basin Landowners
Craig and Nma Leiser
Jack and Judith Johnson
Lauren and Jennifer Fariss
Bernard and Diane Rappa
Catherine Whaley
Heidi Rosebud and Dean Wallace
Stanley and Bonnie VanderVegte
Richard and Sandra Gruber
Terrence and Janet Jones
Washington County
Board Members - Mary Hauser
David Engstrom
Wally Abrahamson
Dennis Hegberg
Myra Peterson
Tun Shug, Administrator
Mary McLothlin, HELM
Don Wisniewski, Public Works
Bob Turrentine, County Attorney
Washington Soil and Water Conservation District
George Rydeen, Chair
Konrad Koosman, Manager
Mark Doneux, Water Resource Specialist
Interested Parties
Attorn~ General
Matt Seltzer
Member Communities to BCWMO
William Nelson, Chair, Baytown Township
Fran Miron, Mayor, City of Hugo
Wyn John, Mayor, Lake Elmo
Mike Munson, LMC (for Lake Elmo)
Barbara O'Neal, Mayor, Oak Park Heights
Tracy Mazanec, Chair, May Township
Town Board Chair, Stillwater Township
Jay Kimble, Mayor, Stillwater
Downstream Landowners
William Johnson
Richard A and Sally McKenzie
MNDNR
Peter Leete, Metro Waters
Molly Shodeen, Metro Waters
~WSR
Board Members
Staff - Harnack
Haertel
Thomas
Metro Staff
...~ .....
'0(. ..,~
e
e. I
~
"
1
e
Board of Water and Soil Resources
Final Staff Report
In the Matter of the Request for
Dispute Resolution Assistance from
the Brown's Creek Watershed Management
Organization Relating to the Kismet
Basin Flooding, Washington County
Findings
Conclusions &
Recommendations
Background
On January 4, 1996, the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) received a letter
from the Brown's Creek Watershed Management Organization (BCWMO) requesting assistance
in resolving a dispute involving a number oflandowners, the BCWMO, and Grant Township. In
this request, the BCWMO asked that three questions be answered:
1. What political entity, agency, group or individuaI(s) is responsible for the removal of
excessive flood waters from the Kismet Basin?
2. What political entity, agency, group or individuaI(s) is responsible for the payment of costs
for the removal of excessive flood waters from the Kismet Basin?
3. What are the reasonable assurances and protection that downstream landowners and water
resources should be provided to achieve item #1 above?
BWSR staff undertook a fact finding effort in order to compile a report to respond to this request.
This report is the result of that investigation.
Findings'
1.
In 1995, a number oflandowners living on Kismet Lane in Grant Township, Washington
County experienced problems relating to flooding ofland adjacent to DNR public water
basins numbers 82-333W and 82-334N. The water basins are unnamed water bodies but
because the basins are connected to each other at high water, the basins are collectively
called Kismet Basin. Some of the affected properties are within a subdivision that was
approved by Washington County on September 3, 1974. The plat was approved by
Washington County and Grant Township. One of the homes on the west side of the
basin was in what is known as the "Muggs Addition". The Opel property and the
RosebudIWalIace property were both out of the platted area, but satisfied all
requirements for building when they were approved. Most of the homes were built
during 1974 and 1975 with at least one of them being built in the early 1980's. Building
permits for each of the homes were approved by Grant Township.
Ie
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 2
2. A hydrographic survey was completed on September 20, 1995 by staff of the DNR. This
survey estimated the Ordinary High Water (OHW) elevation of these basins to be
elevation 943.5. The highest recorded water surface elevation, recorded during this
survey, was 946.02. These basins are considered to be landlocked by the DNR, because
the runout elevation is above the OHW. The report stated that the runout elevation
was at 946.7. The highest known elevation recent elevation was 946.4 based on a stain on
a tree. The basin outlets at the northeast corner of the basin. DNR gage records indicate
the water level in the basin ranged from 946.23 to 945.95 from Sept. 16 to Nov. 22, 1995.
DNR staff feel that the high water levels are due in part to high ground water levels,
documented by the groundwater monitoring "Withrow Obwell" nearby, in the area and
that, consequently, pumping to achieve relief may not be a good solution.
3. The location of the outlet for Kismet Basin was viewed during a site inspection of the area
on March 21, 1996 attended by Barbara Ohman and Bruce Sandstrom of the BWSR,
Mark Doneux of the Washington SWCD and Peter Leete of the MDNR, Division of
Waters. It was uncertain where the exact location of the natural outlet was of two sites
within 100 feet of each other or where the 946.7 elevation was taken from. The southerly
of the two possible outlet locations appeared to be the natural outlet location. There was
evidence that said channel had been improved slightly by digging with a hand shovel
during the fall of 1995 to the point that water had flowed by gravity from the lake at least
at the time of the formation ofice late in 1995. It appeared that the outlet may have been
lowered by about 6 inches but this may be difficult to document by a level survey. This
spring, water is discharging by gravity flow according to local residents. On March
21, the basin was still frozen and no outflow was occurring.
4.
In 1985, the Brown's Creek Watershed Management Organization (BCWMO) was formed
through the execution of a Joint Powers Agreement (JP A) between the Townships of
Baytown, Grant, May and Stillwater, and the Cities of Hugo, Lake Elmo and Stillwater.
5.
In 1986, high water levels in the Kismet basin area prompted landowners to apply for a
DNR permit to pump landlocked basin. In January, 1987, Barr Engineering provided
technical information on behalf of the landowners to be used with the DNR application.
Barr also provided cost estimates for three alternatives for outletting the basin:
a. Install flexible PVC pipe using a trenching contractor - $17,200
b. Install rigid PVC storm sewer pipe - $20,900
c. Install a pump station with 2 300 gpm pumps and a 6-inch discharge line along the
same route as the gravity alternative - $24,400. This alternative would also
involve annual pumping costs of approximately $750.
This information did not include the costs for flowage easements over downstream
properties to handle the outflow. Additional costs to prepare a preliminary feasibility
study and application totaled about $2,160. This involved field surveys of the outlets and
..
t
"
e
4,
.
'.
)
.
e
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 3
e
drainage-way and an hydrologic analysis of the watershed tributary to the basin area to
determine the discharge capacity needed for the outlet.
6. Beginning in 1987 and continuing through 1988, a severe drought affected much of the
Upper Midwest. The high water levels experienced in 1986 in the Kismet Basin then
abated naturally.
7. January 24, 1990, the BCWMO Watershed Management Plan (plan) was approved by the
BWSR. The Plan had initially been drafted in 1987. All final plan revisions and additions
were submitted to the BWSR office in October, 1990. In the Plan's Management Plan
section, the Plan asserts that the "overriding goal of the BCWMO is to maintain as much
authority as possible at the local level. II
8.
The Plan established a Water Management Classification System, which separates waters
of the BCWMO into three classifications: waters of regional, district and local
importance. According to the Plan, the classifications of waters is to "provide a logical
method of assigning planning and management responsibilities and assignment of costs for
improvement projects."
a. Waters of regional importance within the BCWMO are waters considered highly
valuable from a recreational standpoint. Funding for certain projects within this
classification could be funded from other sources such as federal, state, region or
county. The St. Croix River is a water of regional importance.
b. Waters of district importance are waters which will be regulated by the local
community and reviewed by the BCWMO. Funding for project waters within this
classification could be considered on a'tributary basis. Waters of district
importance have been defined as:
i. Brown's Creek
ii. All lakes, ponds and wetlands greater then 2.5 acres and which are
tributary to Brown's Creek
lll. All perennial and intermittent streams which are tributary to Brown's Creek
iv. All waters oflocal importance that, through water control projects, will be
drained or outletted to Brown's Creek
c. Waters of local importance are waters that are not tributary to waters of regional
or district importance and small ponds and wetlands. Funding for projects on
these waters should be primarily from local funding sources. Waters of local
importance are streams or ditches that are not tributary to waters of regional or
district importance and lakes, ponds and wetlands that are not directly tributary to
Brown's Creek
-.
In the BCWMOWater Resources Inventory, the basins in the Kismet area were listed as
waters oflocal importance (Gl1-4, Gll-S and Gll-6), (emphasis added)
. . ~
t
..
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 4
9. In the Plan, Section IV GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES, A. Water
Ouantity Management, Policy IB states that "For all waters oflocal importance, each
unit of government shall be responsible for the correction of flooding, excessive flows and
volumes with its own funds."
e
10. The existing joint powers agreement for the BCWMO does not define a specific process
that would allow the WMO to require a member community to implement its local plan or
to execute a needed project. The authority of its members does not automatically default
to the BCWMO. When the BWSR detennines that a WMO plan is not being
implemented, the responsibility for water planning and implementation shifts to the
county(ies) the WMO lies within (MS 103B.231, Subd. 3).
11. In Spring of 1995, high water levels returned to the Kismet basin area. On July 20, 1995,
the Kismet area landowners provided the first official written notification to Grant
Township regarding the high water situation.
12.
August 13, 1995, flooding of Kismet Lane blocked access to properties of Vander Vegte,
Rosebud, Rappa, Fariss, Johnson, Leiser, Opel and Whaley. Driveways also flooded for
Vander Vegte, Rosebud, Rappa, Fariss, Johnson, and Leiser properties. On March 4,
1996, the BWSR, through staff of the Attorney General's office, requested specific,
quantitative information regarding the existing and potential conditions and alleged
monetary costs resulting from the flooding of the area. The March 27, 1996 response,
through the attorney for the landowners, was not complete, and did not include details on
the physical effects of the flooding. The following lists information gleaned from records,
discussions and field reviews of the alleged effects of the flooding:
i. Water in at least two of the basements of the homes adjacent to the basin,
ii. Cracking and heaving of cement foundations in basements, on patios and in
some garages,
lll. Certain areas of lots temporarily inundated, and,
IV. A number of trees lost due to inundation, (on the order of 1000's of trees,
according to one landowner).
".
13. At the end of August, 1995, Grant Township spent about $10,000 on raising Kismet Lane
to provide emergency access and school bus access. Landowners also added gravel to
driveways (some up to 18"). The amount spent by the landowners was reported to have
been in excess of 520,000.
14.
September, 1995, was a very busy month with on-site visits, meetings, negotiations and
extensive correspondence between the Kismet area landowners, Grant Township,
BCWMO, Washington SWCD, and DNR. In addition, the Kismet area landowners
provided information on the proposal to the McKenzies and their attorney, Richard
e~
~
e
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 5
Galena. Between September 10-13th, prior to issuance of the DNR permit, Kismet area
landowners took action to relieve water problems, by installing a plastic pipe through a
low rise in the gravel pit area of the outlet and laying sandbags to direct water, and began
to outlet water by gravity flow. This action was halted within 2 days. Downstream
landowner, Bill Johnson, gave express written permission to outlet water over his property
on September 15, 1995. Downstream landowners, Richard and Sally McKenzie, gave
express written denial to outlet water over/onto their property on September 14, 1995.
15. On September 18, 1995, the DNR appropriation permit #96-6047 was issued for two
weeks of pumping. Pumping must stop if any downstream impacts are noted. The
pumping could be extended if no downstream impacts were detennmed. No pumping was
undertaken upon issuance of the permit.
16. At the regular meeting of the board of the BCWMO on September 20, 1995, the
BCWMO board declared an emergency under M.S. 103B.252 and ordered Grant
Township to take action within 48 hours. An emergency meeting was held by the
BCWMO on September 25. Township agreed to take action, as long as landowners agree
to pay for costs. The township developed a proposal which the landowners were not
comfortable signing, based upon a clause which would have required the landowners
to take on all liability for any damages which may have arisen.
17. In early October, 1995, the Washington County Dept. of Health and Environmental Land
Management (HELM) staff reported on an inspection of the wells and septic systems for
nine properties adjacent to the Kismet basin. According to the report, all the septic
systems, with the exception of the Johnson residence, "were located and judged not to be
seriously affected by elevated groundwater conditions." Four of the wells tested positive
for total coliform bacteria, but were negative for E. coli, which indicates that there has
been no sewage contamination. Only one well was actually in standing water at the
Vander Vegte property. The drainfield at the Johnson residence is non-conforming as it
does not meet the horizontal and vertical setback and elevation from water, however, the
drainfield did conform at the time of building.
18. In late October, 1995, the Kismet area residents petitioned Grant Township to undertake
the project to relieve the flood levels in the basin. The landowners initially agreed to the
responsibility to pay 100% of the associated costs for the project, distributed equally
among the landowners. This petition also included a waiver of the right to object to the
costs and the right to appeal.
19. On October 20, 1995 Grant Township requested the BCWMO to look into a permanent
solution to the matter.
e
~
/
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 6
20. On January 4, 1996 the BCWMO requested the BWSR for assistance in dispute
resolution. BWSR staffbegan investigation for preparation of a report.
e
21. On January 8, 1996 nine property owners (Johnson, Gruber, Whaley, Fariss, Leiser,
VanderVegte, Jones, Rappa and Rosebud and Wallace), filed a Notice of Claim through
attorney Joshua J. Kanassatega, of Leonard, Street and Deinard. The claim was made
against the Town of Grant, the Brown's CreekWMO, Washington County and the Board
of Water and Soil Resources. All of the foregoing governmental agencies deny any
monetary liability to the landowners.
22. During March, 1996, BWSR staff made requests for information from the landowners
adjacent to the Kismet Basin and from the downstream landowners. Some general
information was received from the Kismet landowners. No information from the
downstream landowners (McKenzies) was received by the writing of this report.
23. A field site review was conducted on March 21, 1996, by Barbara Ohman and Bruce
Sandstrom, BWSR, Mark Doneux, Washington SWCD and Peter Leete, DNR.
Photographs were taken of water levels, outlets (frozen solid on Kismet basin),
downstream outflow areas and damage to some of the properties. A short piece of video
was also shot of an apparent blow-out of the outlet of a pond on William Johnson's
property. This pond was outletting directly onto the McKenzie property.
24.
On Monday, April 15, Gary Erichson, Grant Town Board Chair, met with Bruce
Sandstrom and Barbara Ohman to provide input from the Township's perspective. Mr.
Erichson stated that the township lacks the staff and ability to remedy the Kismet Basin
problem. Grant Township says that if appropriate legal means can be arranged, the
Township would be willing to transfer its taxing and project authorities to the BCWMO to
enable the BCWMO to affect a solution. Grant Township wishes to and will cooperate
in efforts to enhance the current Joint Powen Agreement (JPA) to affect a solution.
Grant Township also advocates the creation ofa watershed district ifBCWMO fails to
resolve the problem.
25. Kismet Basin is a landlocked area that has experienced high water levels in 1986 and again
in 1995. The landowners adjacent to this basin want to protect their properties and relieve
the flood situation to return the basin back to the OHW elevation of943.5. In order to
get the project moving, they agreed with their October petition to Grant Township to take
on all financial responsibilities with this project and to waive their right to object to project
costs or to appeal. However, the landownen do not want to take on the liability for
such a project.
e,
"
e
BCWMOlKismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 7
26. Action was not taken to pump the excess flood waters following the issuance of the DNR
appropriations permit on September 18, 1995. Based upon discussions and information in
the file, the main problem appears to be with concerns about liability for potential damages
to downstream properties. Grant Township does not want to take on what it views as a
risk of liability by taking on a project to relieve the flood waters in the Kismet Basin.
Grant Township is willing to and prefers to convey its authority to the BCWMO so that
the WMO can sponsor a project to lower the water level of Kismet Basin
Conclusions
1. Kismet Basin has experienced high water levels in 1986 and 1995. In addition, Kismet
basin is at or near its natural outlet level.
2. The high water has already impacted and has the potential to impact private property in
the area and downstream, as well as the natural resources of the area.
3. The emergency declared on September 20, 1995 by the BCWMO in accordance with
103B.252 was valid based upon loss of basic and emergency access endangering health
and safety. There are also potential health problems with the Johnson septic system and
at least two of the wells. However, the BWSR staff are not certain that the BCWMO had
the authority to order Grant Township to take action under this declaration.
4. According to the BCWMO Watershed Management Plan, Kismet Basin is a "water of
local importance", and Grant Township is the responsible governmental unit. This is
responsive to Question # 1 from the January 4, 1996 BCWMO request for assistance.
I.
5.
There are many options for funding a project to relieve water level problems such as posed
by the Kismet Basin. It appears that the use of special assessments to the benefited
property owners is the most appropriate, since the landowners have stated a willingness to
pay the costs and since other means such as using a township wide tax would lead to
further delays in getting anything accomplished. This is in response to Question #2from
the January 4, 1996 BCWMO requestfor assistance.
6.
To date, there has been no determination that the BCWMO has failed to implement its
plan. Grant Township, has however, not implemented its local plan for various reasons.
The BWSR would consider the failure of the BCWMO to implement its plan when it
concludes that the BCWMO has been unsuccessful in obtaining implementation by Grant
Township. Ifno resolution of the Kismet Basin problem proceeds within 45 days after a
meeting of the affected parties to review this report, the staff of the BWSR would
recommend that the BWSR Board make a determination that the BCWMO plan is not
being implemented, in accordance with MNRules Chapter 8410.0180.
,"
BCWMOlKismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 8
tit
7. The matter of potential liability for damages to downstream properties could be mitigated
through establishment of flowage easements necessary to allow the passage of the
overflow from the Kismet Basin. Adequate compensation for these easements must be
determined and provided as part of the cost of the project. This is in response to Question
#3 from the January 4, 1996 BCWMO request for assistance.
8. Grant Township could use a MS 429 proceeding to construct a project thereby assigning
benefits and damages to the Kismet Basin landowners. Grant Township could
alternatively set up a subwatershed taxing district under 103B.245 and levy a tax across
the subwatershed and/or specially assess the benefitted landowners.
9. The BCWMO could only effect a solution to the problem if the WMO is vested with the
authority to do such a project either by amending its' current joint powers agreement or
possibly a joint powers agreement between Grant Township and the BCWMO to utilize
Grant township's authorities to execute a project.
10. If the BWSR determines that the BCWMO is failing to implement its plan (ie. fails to
obtain action by Grant Township or takes no action on its own), Washington County
becomes the responsible unit for water planning and implementation under 103B.231,
Subd.3(b). The County could take action to implement a project and would likely assess
the costs back to the benefitted landowners.
11.
If nothing is done, more flooding is likely since it is conceivable that water levels could
reach a foot or so higher than the highest recorded. This would cause a natural outflow
that could damage downstream properties. To do nothing is an alternative but could
result in increased loss in tax base, increased cost of road maintenance, and damages to
downstream landowners by erosion and minor flooding of field and pasture.
Recommendations
1. Grant Township should act, through its own authorities, to resolve the flooding
conditions in Kismet Basin. Before deciding on a course of action, the Township should
review the possible alternatives. The alternatives should include a gravity outlet, a
pumped outlet, the raising of roads and driveways, the raising of homes, or to do nothing.
Grant Township may apportion the costs of the project to the directly benefitted
properties through appropriate authorities provided in statute MS 429 or 103B.
2.
The best solution and most cost effective option appears to be the construction of a
permanent, gravity flow system. A project to solve the problem by pumping should not be
considered unless there is an emergency.
e,
"
e
BCWMO/Kismet Basin Report
May 10, 1996
Page 9
3. If Grant Township is unwilling to pursue the project on its own, one possibility would be
for Grant to seek a short-term joint powers or other appropriate legal agreement with
BCWMO to do a project by transfer of existing authorities to the BCWMO. Another
option would be to permanently amend the current JP A to give the BCWMO the
authorities needed to address future similar situations. Both parties should consult with
their legal counsel for implementation of such options.
4. The BWSR will hold a meeting to discuss the recommendations of this report at 7:00
p.m., Monday, May 6, at the Washington County Board Room in the Washington County
Government Center in Stillwater. In accordance with MN Rules Chapter 8410.0180,
Subp. 3(C), the BCWMO shall hold a public hearing to discuss this report within 30 days
of the May 6, 1996 meeting sponsored by the BWSR If the BCWMO does not come up
with a means to implement a project under its plan and provide movement toward a
resolution within 45 days (by June 21, 1996), BWSR staffwill recommend to the BWSR
Board to declare that the BCWMO is not implementing its plan. Upon such declaration,
the BWSR would request that Washington County a) take appropriate action to
implement the plan to remedy the problems on Kismet Basin and b) to take other
appropriate action to effect a long term solution to the governance of water management
issues of the Browns Creek watershed.
5. If Washington County petitions for the creation of a watershed district as part of the long
term solution to the governance issue, such petition should include the consolidation of
two or more existing Water Management Organizations and or Watershed Districts. The
district petitioned for should include enough tax base to generate the revenue needed to
support at least one full time administrator at a low cost to the average homeowner.
Draft report dated April 30, 1996. Minor revisions made based on input received at May 6,
1996 meeting on this matter.
Final report dated this 10th day of May, 1996
Report Prepared by Barbara Ohman and Bruce Sandstrom, BWSR Staff
Ie
. )
~5/16{a6 THU 11:18 FA!
~OOl
1/1 feniJlOf Hu! UfiJmf
201 PirKfeD fenate Olliff lvi/diD{
fldfhill[tOn, P( 20pO
(20Z) 124j244
f31 (202) Z1;!-o9S6
fax Tran~mh~ion
~ot ~" \C..~\o(.
~ UJ t\ 9'\, ~ 1 LA'"
Co\"\. · U:"\t\. w~~
6. \ (,. 4C.
:-r,. ~P,\ ~ 1~ ~
rt ~~~~.~
~\.~~\ ~.J.-./~
NAME:
COMPAtfY:
fAX "UMBER:
DATE ~EHT:
"015:
~ent To:
Number of
Page~: ~
Ondudlng COYC[ lhcct)
~ent From:
o Sen. Rod Grams. Member of Congress 0 Eric felton. Communications Oirector 0 Tsm Stout. Staff Assistant
o 0ui5 Erikstrup. Chief or Staff 0 Jensine Frost. Executive Assistant 0 Hero Terry. 5yrtems Manager
o Eri~ /ldmoth. Staft' Assistant 0 Elizabeth Heir. Office Manager 0 Joe ir&uger. Legislative Correspondent
o Pell)' Aasness. Legislative Correspondent 0 Peter Hong. Press Secretl.rylLA 0 1Q:,~y Wanke. Staff Assisunt
e 0 Mi~ .Amery. Legislative Assistant
o Morgan Brown. Legisliltive Assistant
o IVme Crowther. Legislative Assistant
o Don Eridoon. Legislative Correspondent
I"",,'
.. . ..
o Kim lichy. Legislative Director
o Andrea Miles. Deputy Press Secretary
o Brent Moore. Stall' Assisunt 0
o Eri~ RiJdeel1. Staff Assistant 0
-~
;--.
05/16/96 THU 11:18 FAX
~002
I
I
!
tinittd ~tatt5 ~rnatt
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
e
c
i
May 16, 1996
The Honorable Pete V. Domenici
Chairman .
Subcommittee on Energy
and Water Development
Committee on Appropriations
131 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Chairman Domenici:
We are writing to you requesting $2.85 million in federal funds
to enable the Corps of Engineers to complete the repair,
reconstruction, and extension of the levy system at Stillwater,
Minnesota. The project was authorized in the Water Resources
Development Act of 1994, and an appropriation of $2.4 million was
made by your committee at that time to begin work on this
project.
The plans and specifications have been completed, all
environmental aspects of the project have been met, and
construction contracts will be aw~ded within the next 60 days.
Construction work is not scheduled to commence until July 1,
1~~6, because of high water conditions again this year, on the
St. Croix River.
,
,.
The Corps of Engineers has determined that there are insufficient
funds to complete the first phase of the project. The soil
conditions of river silt and wood debris from the logging
industry in the 1800's that occurred on the river front has
required much more remedial work than was originally anticipated.
Further, the deterioration of the levy wall was exacerbated and
accelerated by the floods of 1993, and it is anticipated that
further damage by the high waters will occur again this year.
~
~
Recognizing the severity of the problem, along with the
information provided in the Corps' Design Memorandum, the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee increased the 1992
authorization in their 1996 Water Resources Development Act to
$11.6 million.
The completion of this project is essential for both the tt
protection of lives and property in downtown Stillwater, and the
protection of the water quality of the wild and scenic St. croix
~.
05/16/96 THU 11:19 FAX
~003
e
Page 2
May 16, 1996
River. The trunk sewer line for the City of Stillwater runs
adjacent to the levy wall, and carries more than one million
gallons of raw sewage to the ponding area each day. The Corps
has warned that the levy wall could disintegrate at any time, and
with the "suspect" soil conditions, the entire river bank would
quickly follow. Some 23 structures located on the flood plain
are identified as National Historic Sites by the U.S. Department
of Interior.
We urge you to approve $2.85 million federal funds in the FY1997
Energy and Water Appropriations bill to complete the first phases
of this project. The Governor and the Minnesota State
Legislature approved the additional matching funds required in
their 1996 session ending in April of this year for this
appropriations request.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should you
require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
Sarah Neimeyer with Senator Wellstone's office at 224-5641 or Tom
Yedinak with Senator Grams' office at 224-3244.
sincerely,
ptMJ fAldli1J-
Paul Wellstone
U.S. Senate
// / A--
~
U.S. Senate
~.-
e
.~
~
j
i
05/16/96 THlT 11:19 FAX
tlnitrd ~tatt5 ~rnate
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
,
May 16, 1996
The Honorable J. Bennett Johnston
i\anking
Subcommittee on Energy
an~ Water Development
committee on Appropriations
131 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Johnston:
We are writing to you requesting $2.85 million in federal funds
to enable the Corps of Engineers to complete the repair,
reconstruction, and extension of the levy system at Stillwater,
Minnesota. The project was authorized in the Water Resources
Development Act of 1994, and an appropriation of $2.4 million was
made by your committee at that time to begin work on this
projeot.
The plans and specifications have been completed, all
environmental aspects of'the project have been met, and
construction contracts will be awarded within the next 60 days.
Construction work is not scheduled to commence until July 1,
1996, because of high water conditions again this year, on the
St. Croix R.iver.
The Corps of Engineers has determined that there are insufficient
funds to complete the first phase of the project. The soil
conditions of river silt and wood debris from the logging
industry in the 1800's that occurred on the river front has
required much more remedial work than was originally anticipated.
Further I the deterioration of the levy wall was exacerbated and
accelerated by the floods of 1993, and it is anticipated that
further damage by the high waters will occur again this year.
Recogni~ing the severity of the problem, along with the
information provided in the Corps' Design Memorandum, the Senate
Environment and Public Works committee increased the 1992
authori~ation in their 1996 Water Resources Development Act to
$11.6 million.
The completion of this project is essential for both the
protection of lives and property in downtown Stillwater, and the
protection of the water quality of the wild and scenic St. Croix
lID 004
e
.1
05/16/96 THlT 11:20 FAX
~005
e
Page 2
May 16, 1996
'"
River. The trunk sewer line for the City of Stillwater runs
adjacent to the levy wall, and carries more than one million
gallons of raw sewage to the ponding area eac~ day. The Corps
has warned that the levy wall could disintegrate at any time, and
with the "suspect" soil conditions, the enti~e river bank would
quickly follow. Some 23 structures located on the flood plain
are identified as National Historic Sites by the U.S. Department
of Interior.
We urge you to approve $2.85 million federal funds in the FY1997
Energy and Water Appropriations bill to complete the first phases
of this project. The Governor and the Minnesota State
Legislature approved the additional matching funds required in
their 1996 session ending in April of this year for this
appropriations request.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should you
require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
Sarah Neimeyer with Senator Wellstone's office at 224-564l or Tom
Yedinak with Senator Grams,'/office at 224.-3244.
Sincerely,
f avJ.. wLll.. ~
Paul Wellstone
u.s. Senate
. e'/ J-..~
~ Grams
U.S. Senate
-J
'"
-::;",.
.-
~
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND C
..
MINNESOTA DNR PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER: 9t, -c, I C,.\"
DATE OF REQUESf: ~ - 2 -I C,
(Note: Comments on this application are Due 30 dayS from receipt of this notice. Return Comments to: DNR -
Division of Waters, Metro Region, UOO Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106.)
FROM: tv\d\.... ~~~-
TO: (j
C City I County '-.
O' Watershed Authority
o Cons. District (SWCD)
o Corps of Engineers
(j D~"R Wildlife
PROPOSAL INFORMATION
Applicant: ~'r\.. ~ aT
Protected Water: $\- ' ~"\. ~ Q~
j-
:?' ~INNESOTA
.......-~. ~.....
~~ ...
e
o DNR fisheries
o DNR Eco. Services
D
PHONE: (612) 772-7910
~'L. ~Y-- ttts. I \;.l-\tllN"~ .
_\.~~\~ S\- ~ _ ,_
Jv\~'~ ~ 0 t'\~t<- - \.AJ~~ ~_ CO,
~\ ~ r... ~ ~\.) ~ ~ '"
-r ~ . '^" \.10
~~. 2:i~~\~"t)
lfto,~ ~~~
S~ ~.~~Ov--.. j 1~~ \~-n~~
~R- /()~\~Jc
,
DNR ID#:
County:
~"'~.
Project Description: ~~.' ~\..~.:n~.~W \''-S~\t~~ II ~ 1~ ~ \~j) (Jv,J
~. ~~~~~i~:e ~~~,~\ t"vn\~ ~ ~~~hvc~'O>-
~~~, -~~~~ \~~~~~n~~~~~~~
\L _ _ ~ _ ()~" ~~ . O.s~\-\ ~C\ -. 'i ~ tk~ cic ~-t l f\vO \r.2- (J 1\ (L
~ 'l\) \-{ <t ~~ w-\.,\\~~ ~
COMMENTS ON PRoposAL
Comments on Project by Reviewer (attach separate sheet if needed):
Recommendation of Reviewer:
Ie
Name of Reviewer:
Title:
Date:
I request a copy of the recommendation of the Area Hydrologist: YES NO
LOCAL--STATI::--H':UrJ{AL 1-'K.U.lt.Ll I'4Vllrl\-A1IVN rUN,IYl
Yo-:l_moy Wt zJW form lQ rwtify 1M M~ Dcpa:rtma1J of NaJJJraJ Racurca, 1M Army Corp of EngiJiun, and yo.u c.ounry aM
~ OfflU:1 of a projca or wed j'OU propose whkJa TMJ fDJJ wiJJWt Ihcir juri.sdiai.on. 1"M.u QgmOa W:Wd DdYi.st: you of thdr
~ if arry, wilJUn -IS d.ap of ra:.dpt of zJW nctifu:micn. Thi1 fon;s is p-ovided as a COrtvaUcna /JJ1d its uu is ~ Y 00
may, if you wWz, apply ~pamit:s or t:l1J./.h.oriz. u.ring st4nt1md agcnq femu. FUl cw lhU form CDmplady and nWJ a copy. wi.J.h
plans, maps, de. lQ t.aeJJ Of 1M agenda lbt.aJ on 1M rrvcnt of 1M form. }(up a"copy of all rnaJcials mbrniacd for your~' Y 00
obtain all " t1J.J.1.hori:z.. ~ " worl::,. VIOla.tioru S or FedaaJ laws ~ . Mbk-
.. llti-.' dvi1 and Of' aimin.a1
~-
I. Applicant's Name (Fi~t, Last, M.J.) I AUlhorued Agent, if any
MN / DOT / Kel"\"'E -t-h R. M \ LLEiR.
Address (Street, RfD, Box Number, City, ~ Zip. Ccx1c.)... .
3l\~S HADLEY Ave.. NOR..t\h OA.'f::DALf.. MN 55 \ 2.~
LOCATiON OF PROPOSED PROJECT (ATTACH DRAWING SHOWING HOW TO GET TO SiTE)
I
/
Area Code, Telepbone
("12) 771 - 50S I
II.
Govtmment lot(s) Quanu Secrion(s) Stction(s) No. Tow/l.Ship(s) No. Range(s) No. Lot, Block, Subdivision
S~c.'s. 3.4.S,b;' ?>\. 3'.:'?,~L\ T2.'\ N -, T~ N ~2.0W
Fir-t No., Box No., or Project Addrtss County Work will affcct _tau _wet/aM Lwataway _ag production
. WAS\'\INL:.fON. Wattrbody Namt, No. (if known) 5T. CCZOlX 1<.1 VE:R.
Ill. ESTIMATED PROJECI' COST: SIOO 000 000 LENGTH OF SHORE AFFECTED (in (u:t):. fU>,c SSO l.1~ FT.
ON 60 m THe "" ('3<:. ~ /oJ SHOfl..E!''ii
n/" Vo/umt of fill or excavation (cubic )Ids.): . Aua filled or acavattd is 3.'2.. acres, or IlfO.oco square fur.
(NOTE: You may substitute dimensions)' (See ATTA(.\o}Et> 5HEGTS)
V: TYPE OF WORK..A.ND.ARE,.( (Ol.e.ck aJJ Iisat apply): ~FUJ... -2LE:XCAVA1E _REPAlR _CONSTRUcr
REMOVE DRAIN DAM
)( SHORELINE X WErUND X. WAn:RWAY _lXXX _CULYEKr ...A.-BRI.JXjE _VJ:E
_ACCESS PAm _RlPRAP _SAND Bl..ANKET 0T1IE.R (da:::ribc):
WETLAND TYPE(S) AND ACREAGE(S) PROPOSED TO BE FILLEDIDRAlNED:
A/tach drawing1 and p/tJIU.'lncb.uJe a do::ripion of al'l1 POpo.wl Compc:ruDZDrJ miJi&azion. Irnpot1t1n1: Jdastify al'l1 dirpoSlJl aNI borrow an:a.t.
Dacribe the work bcloW; how ir would bc do~, whoJ tl{IlI'pmutt would be wed:
(See AlTAC\\EO SH-EETS)
VI.' PROJECT PURPOSE. ( why is this project nudtd--what benefits will it providt?):
(SeE ATTA<.\\ED S"E.ETS)
V1J. ALTERNATIYES (da~ any other nra or mahcd.r th.a1 c.ouJd be ~ lQ t:JJ:JW:ye ~ purJ>OU of)'OUl' projta w~ tn'oidin
or minimizing Wdland/waJer impacts: A1l4dz adt:li!i.oMJ shtt:u, if nu:;rkd).
<Sa: ATTAC.~EC ~ ~EE.\S ) ~
VIII. DATES- Activity proposed to btgin on: \\ Io"lt> & complcUd: i\ ~
Has tJIt1 of the work betn done? NO...:i-. YES _ (identify tJIt1 compltud work on drawing).'
L~ ADJOiNING PROPERTf OWNERS
Name Addrtss
1. . '.' IV A
2
(Attach lut if mort than fwO).
City
State
Zip
x PERMITS have btUl rtctivtd (tIItu an R) or a/re:Jdy applkd for (tIItC1' an A) from: _DNR -A-ARMY CORPS
COUNTY TOWN/CITY WATERSHED DISTRICT MN. POLLUl"JON CONTROL AGENCY.
~an ~ survey of 1M project sill: bun~? 'l€S If JO, by whom: cOt-lS\X.TIWT FOfZ. M""OoT
Xl. I he:rc11y nctifJ 1M rr:cipi.ml:r of lhU form of 1M project proposed hariJ1 and rr:quat t1uJl1 be adYisaI of iJJT] pcrrni13 or o<h.a
~ CDn.Caning th.i.r projc::1 th.a1 I rrw.st obtc.in. prrx:ading wilh wcri: bcfort: a/J required au.thorizJuioru
an: obtDintd 17U1J subject mt: lQ Fedaal, SlaU, and/or! ." . aM/or aimir..aJ pc::rw1.Jia. ,
~ ~ J }
~ "Ie ~ ..p TE: &/- 2. ~ 'HD
Signa1urc of Penon Proposing Projtd or~;:::: ~:%~ 01 ~
c;e ~ 9i%~ cg.,
<<<PLEASE J.~...~CO
~~ V'/ ,..~
~/nIFI~k~
BACK OF FORM> > >
..'
INSTRUCTIONS-PLEASE READ CAREFULLY
\
~'
A ropy of this rona, ~~ rop~ of all ~ dnnriJt:s, de., sJaOOd be Sc:.t to eKll ~ lDdkated belmr.
Please c:hcck the -appropriate spaces bebl'f to S*'" ~. '-4 J" Lere J"OII are ~,~ this fonL Il P'ftW"m her to keep a. a
copy for ~l1'. DO NOT SEND ANY PERMIT PROCESSI.?'!G FEES Wllti nus FORM. .,
:h- MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT (CITY OR TOWN) QB COUNT{ ZONING OFFICE. SEND TO COUNT{ IF YOUR
. PROJECT SITE IS NOT IN' A MUNICIPAL AREA. PLEASE UST TIIE MUNICll'AlITi' OR COUNTY TO WHICH
YOU ARE SENDING mE FORM: OAK P.M."- I+EI~l\TS, STl'-L..WA~R. , wASt'fIN61"0C1 co.
.:L W~~~~~D~~~O=~E(~Zi r:g~J,D~'~O~(t~~~~~).,,^'cote S1': c.P-o\X ~I"e~ ""&\0
1L- MINNESOTA DEPT. OF NAroRAL RESOURCES REGIONAL OFFICE.
..L- YOUR LOCAL SOn. AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
.L u.s. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. SEND TO:
~ .,
Department or the Arm'!, Corps or EngIneers, St. Paul District,
ATfN: CO.R, 180 Kellogg Blvd. E.., Room 1421, St. Paul, MN 55101.1479
Note: The above agencies may provide a copy or your completed form to tbe MinDcsota PoUution Control AgeDcY (MPCA). MPCA water
quality rules may apply to your proposaL
A TIENTION. FROM USDA: Any activity including drainage, dredging, fillIng, levellng or other manipulations,
includIng maintenance, may atrect a land user's eligibility Cor USDA benefits under the 1985 Food Security Act
:1S amended. Check with your local USDA office to request and complete Form AD-l026 prior to initiating
activity.
IMPORTANT: Some of the above offices may allow this [onn to be used as a permit application form. The Corps of
Engineers will accept this [onn as an application ronn. If you wish this form to constitute an application to the Corps of
Engineers for any necessary pennits for your project under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, and/or under
Section 404 oC the Qe3n Water Act, please carefully read the following infonnation and sign where indicated.
..
Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to aUlhorize the activities descn1>ed herein. I ceniCy that I am familiar .'
with the information conuined in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true,
complete. and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities or I am acting as
the duly authorized agent of the applicant. '
~ R tY'lJtl Lf /2- ?J I ftlc
Signature of Applicant
Date
Signature of Agent
Date
NOTE: The application must be signed by the person who desires to uDdertake the proposed aaivity (applicant) or it may be sigr;ed by a
duly authorized agent if the inConnation requested below is provided.
Agent's Name: KeNN.e.~~, MILLE R Agent's 1itle: w2f ~:raT bl\AJJA6~R
Address: 31.\-e5 HACLE.'i IW~ No~'1t\
DA~OALE.. W\N. 55 \z.e
Tclephone:_C <0\2.) 77 q - 50S1
18 U.S.c. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any rnanoer within the jurisdiction of any depanmect or agency of The United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, coDceals..or covers up t1j any trick, scheme, or device a material faa or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing. or document knowing same to contain acy false, fictitious, or
fraudulent statement or entry. shall be tined not more thaD S10,OOO or imprisoned not more tban five yean. or both.
DO NOT SEND ANY PERMIT PROCESSING FEES WITH THIS FORM:
.
. I
WASHINGTON COUNTY
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
GOVERNMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH. STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-
612-430-6000 Facsimile Machine 612-430-
James R. Schug
County Administrator
DATE:
Township Clerks, City Administrators, School Dr
Jim Schug, County Administrator (L~
May 7, 1996 yr...
TO:
FROM:
RE:
League of Local Governments Organizational Meeting
Attached is a copy of the summary of the League of Local Governments
organizational meeting that was held on Tuesday, April 30, 1996.
I would appreciate it if you would distribute copies of this summary to your elected
officials and forward any comments that you have on this proposed future direction
to me or Commissioner Myra Peterson who is representing the County in setting up
the structure for the group.
I am also enclosing copies of by-laws that are used in Ramsey and Dakota counties
for their Leagues of Local Governments. We are interest~d in hearing whether there
is more interest in the more highly structured model that Ramsey County uses or the
informal model that is in place in Dakota County. Again, please forward any
comments to me or Commissioner Peterson. ..
As you can see in the meeting summary, there is interest in having another meeting
which has been tentatively scheduled for July 3D, 1996, at 7:00 p.m. in the evening.
The County has agreed to facilitate the convening of the meeting with help from
representatives of other local governments and school districts. This will be discussed
further at the Clerk/ManagerlAdministratorlSuperintendent meeting on May 15, 1996.
lie
Attachments
I
Ie
cc: Commissioner Wally Abrahamson
Commissioner Dave Engstrom
Commissioner Mary Hauser
Commissioner Dennis Hegberg
Commissioner Myra Peterson
_ on Rocydod P_
EaUAl EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
(i)
'-.
.
SUMMARY OF THE WASHINGTON COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL
e GOVERNMENTS ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
TUESDAY, APRil 30, 1996
Dave Engstrom, Chair of the Washington County Board of Commissioners, welcomed
representatives of local governments, school districts, and state legislators to the
meeting at the Washington County Historic Courthouse to discuss the possibility of
establishing a League of Local Governments in Washington County.
Those present introduced themselves and participated in a discussion on interest in
forming such a group. There was general agreement that meeting on a regular basis
would have a number of benefits:
. It would create a good opportunity for information sharing to learn
what is going on within other jurisdictions throughout the County.
. There would be the opportunity to hear coordinated presentations on
issues of common concern, rather than having programs set up at each
individual unit of government.
. There would be the possibility of a united voice in communicating
positions on legislation affecting local government. (It is understood
that there would need to be unanimous agreement before any position
could be communicated to the legislative delegation.)
. Most present seemed to indicate that quarterly meetings with special
meetings called as necessary would be the most appropriate frequency
for such a group. Some concern was expressed that it not just be
another meeting added to the already significant calendar of meetings
that local officials attend.
Ie
Possible Topics for Future Discussion:
During the course of the round table discussion, the following issues were raised as
possible topics for future meetings: .
e
Growth and Development Strategies
Extension of the MUSA Line
Surface Water Management
Solid Waste Management
Property Tax Reform
Legislation Affecting Local Government
Sharing of Local Resources
Recreational Facilities
Planning Updates, e.g. TIF Districts
Linear Parks/Park Planning
Liveable Communities
Transportation
Board of Government Innovation and Cooperation
Intergovernmental Communication Using the Internet
Solid and Hazardous Waste Program Manager Judy Arends provided an update to the
group on the situation that Ramsey and Washington Counties are currently facing
with the Resource Recovery Facility in Newport. Judy explained the history of the
project and the role that other units of local government could have in helping the
Counties assure a steady supply of waste deliVered to the plant in the coming years
and in facilitating the handling of this waste in a way that is environmentally
responsible as opposed to the use of landfills which hold liability and a higher risk
of future pollution problems.
Future Direction
Next Meeting:
It was agreed that the County would set up the next meeting, most likely for the
evening of July 30, 1996. County Administrator Jim Schug will send out by-laws for
the comparable organizations in Ramsey and Dakota Counties for Washington County
groups to review and comment as to which format is most desirable: a more highly
structured organization as in Ramsey County, or a more informal group as in Dakota .
County. This information will be sent to the administrators, managers, _
e
I
Ie
"
superintendents, and clerks in all the local jurisdictions for distribution.
Commissioner Myra Peterson will facilitate the review of the feedback from this
survey and will report back at the next meeting.
The agenda item for the next meeting will be developed in consultation with
representatives of a group of County, city, school, and town officials.
Addendum
In a subsequent meeting of the South Washington County Intergovernmental Group,
Mayor Bill Hargis of Woodbury asked that arrangements be made for that group to
meet briefly following the July 30 League meeting, to discuss any issues of particular
interest to the southern part of the County. This would eliminate the need for a
separate meeting.
,"
e
3490 Lexington Avenue North
St. Paul, MN 55126
(612) 49Q.5600
C:APn'Ot. COUNTY
O~ M1HNaoTA
RAMSEY COUNTY MEMBERS
Arden HII1JS
Faleon IWQhb
GIm I.IIte
L....nl......
AdQpted January 1988
Amended December 1992
Amended December 1994
UtIlI! Canada
l<<ap....lMMI
Mounds VIew
Hew Brighton
~08Ila
North" PM
~OOun1y
R-uIe
st. Anthonr
et. Paul
CHARTER
RAMSEY COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
An Organization of Units of Local Government Empowered by Minnesota
State Laws 1963, Chapter 728.
..
, ARTICLE I
NAME AND PURPOSE
$haNvI4!w
Vadnais _nts
Whb ..., lAb
WhIte Be8rTownshiP
. !
~tion 1. NAME. This org~tion shall be known as the RAMSEY
COUNTY LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
:;ection 2. pURPOSE. The purposes ot this organization shall be:
Ie
AUO<=IAT1! M..aI!M
Mounds YkW School
Dls1rktM21
NorIII Sf. P8uV
....,1...... .......
DtStrkt 1122
RowAn. 8GhooI
DlS'a'*IID
9f. PIIuI SOMol
DlstJlctI825
(a)
To foster and enhance cooperation and coordinati.on among
units of local government, as defined in Minnesota State Laws
1963, Chapter 728, in Ram~ County as well as in adjacent
counties in order to increase the effectiveness, efficiency and
economy of the delivery of public services to the residents of
said units of loea1 government;
Wllne ........
:IlGh. Df.&.1tI4
1
f'anseY SoIl Water
Conservdo" DIstrlct
Printed elf) nr.ydsd IN1IW
l. #:J,~090et~~9
..e9 lJ.I~~
Wd~o:e 98-9~-~
^_Nno~ N019NIHS,M:A9 ^~H
, I
(b)
To promote the joint and severnl interests of its Members through research into local
governmental problems in Ramsey County and the useful application of tbe results
of this reseatCh of said problems;
e
(e) To collect, stud.yand disseminate information to Members and associates, including
information on local government ordinances and relevant development plans;
(d) To encourage the coordination of planning and physical development activities in
Ramsey County as well as in adjacent counti=;
(e) To provide Members with a better liaison with each other, units of local government
in adjacent counties, the Metropolitm Council and other metropolitan agenci<es, and
the State Lepslature and state agencies; and
(f) To work closely with the League of Minnesota Cities, the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities and other organizations and associations in the interests
of the Members.
ARTICLE n
MEMBERSHIP: APPOINTMENT OF DELEGATES
S~on L MEMBERS. The Citi= of Arden HiIls, Falcon Heights, Gem Lake, Little Canada,
Lauderdale, Maplewood., Mounds View, New Brighton, North Oaks, North St. Paul, Ro~c,
Sl Anthony. Sl Paul, Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake, the town of White
Beat, Ramsey County, watershed districts, soU and water conservation distri~. school districts
and all other governmental subdivisions lying in whole or in part within Ramsey County, are
hereby empowered to participate in the organization of a Ramsey County league of local
governments and to be Members thereof. ..
Any unit of local government or other governmental subdivisions as hereinabove described in
Ramsey County shall be entitled to membership in the RAMSEY COUNTY LEAGUE OF
LOCAL GOVERNMRlIITS (hereinafter LEAGUE). Membership in the LEAGUE ~ be
certified by resolution of the iQveming body of each unit of local government, and shall be
deemed accomplished when fIled with the Coordinator of the LEAGUE.
S~tion 2. DELEGATES. Each Member of the LEAGUE shall appoint through its regular
appointment process two elected or appointed officials as its Delegates to represent it at LEAGUE
meetings. One shall be designated as an alternate. Each Member shall be allowed one vote on
all LEAGUE matters, said vote to be cast by the primary Delegate or, in his or her absence, by
the alternate Delegate or, in his or her absence, by the appointed official. In the event none of
the two desi~ Delegates can attend a LEAGUE meeting, a Member may appoint a temporary
De1eaate for such meeting, provided that the Member notifies the Coordinator of the designation
of the tcmpora%7i Delegate prior to the meeMa. Said temporary Delegate sh2ll. be allowed to vote
2
e~
€ #:1.~090€1~~9
..€9 J.i.:~~
~d~O:€ 96-9~-~
^~NnOJ NOlgN:HS~M:^a ^~~
"
e
only at the meeting for which he or she was designated. Appointment as a Delegate shall include
the duty and responsibility of regular attendance at LEAGUE mecting~.
SectiQU 3 ASSOCIATE MEMBERS. Any civic organization within Ramsey County, and any
unit of government, and other civic organizations ai hereinabove described in adjacent counties,
and any prcsc:nt or fotmer elected Ot appointed government official from within Ramsey County,
shall be entitled to Associate membership in the LEAGUE. Said Associate member3IDp shall
entitle such unit of local government or such person to all rights and privileges of LEAGUE
membership as herein described, except that said Associate member shall not have the right to vote
at LEAGUE meetings.
Section 4. WITHDRAWAL OF ME.M6ERSHIP. Any Member or Associate member may
withdraw from the LEAGUE upon payment of all monies due to date, and upon written
notification to the Coordinator of the LEAGUE. Any monies received by the LEAGUE but
unexpended shall be returned to the: withdrawing Member on a pro-rated basis.
ARTICLE m
EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBEltS:
DUTIES, QUALD1CATIONS, TERMS, POWERS
Section 1. OFFICERS/DIRECTORS. The Officers/DireCtors of the LEAGUE shall be the
PIesiden~ Vice-President, Treasurer, and Past President, and five other persons, all of whom shall
be elected at the Annual Meeting by a majority vote. The OfficersIDirectors of the LEAGUE
shall constimte the Executive Board, (hereinafter Board) hereinbelow empowered and described.
~ectinn 2. QUALIFICATIONS. All OfficersIDirectors of the LEAGUE shall be eleded or
appointed officials of a. Member unit of local government as descnOed in Article n. Section 1.
Section 3. PBESIDL"i. TIle President shall be the chicf executive officer of the LEAGUE and
shall preside at all meetings of the membership and of the Board. He or she shall see that all
orders and resolutions are effected and shall have all powers. duties. and authority necessary,
inciden1a1, and CU5lomary to the office of President. The President shaJ1 serve for a term of one
yeu, provided that no one person shall serve morc than two <<m$:CUtivc terms as President.
Section 4_ VICE PRESIDENT . The Vice President shall act in the absence of the President,
with the same duties and powers, and shall perform such other duties as the Board may direct,
inc1uding, but not lirnited to, chairing the Legi~lative Committee. The Vice President shall serve
for a term of one year, providing that no one person shall serve more than two consecutive terms
as Vice-President.
e
Section s. TREASlJRER. The Trc:t\3U1'Ct' shall have custody of all funds of the LEAGUE) keep
full accounts and recorc:1s of all receipts and disbursements, and deposit monies or other assets in
depositories desi&l1at.ed'by the Board. He or she sball disburse funds as may be directed by the
3
~, ill: ',I,I'!MIr.t~~~1
..e9 11roo
Wdeo:€ ge-9~-~
^_Nnoo N019N:HSVM:A8 ^OH
e
Board, render an accounting of ftmcls to the Board or to Members when required or requested, and
shall give a bond as determined by the Boanl, the premium of which bond is to be paid by
LEAGUE funds. He or she shall cause an annual audit to be rr-.ade by a certified public
accountant, and shall make a report on the financial condition of the LEAGUE at the Annual
Meeting. He or sbe Shall prepare an annual budget to present to the Board. (See Article IX.)
Sfs!tinn 6_ PAST PRESIDENT. The Past President shall be the immediate past president of the
LEAGUE. He or she shall reipOOd to the LEAGUE'S needs, thus providing continuity. and shall
perfonn such other duue;, as the Board deems necessary. The Past President shall remain on the
LEAGUE'S Board at least one year after serving as president.
S~on 7. OTHER OFFICERSIDIRECTORS. The other OfficerslDiro.:tors of the LEAGUE
shall sexve for a term of one year. One OlficerlDirec.tor shall be designated Membership
Development Chairman I one Officer/Director shall be designated Bylaws Chairman, one
Officer/Director shall serve on the Legislative Committee and one Officer/Director shall serve on
a committee at larie. .
Section 8. VACANCY. The following shall constitute a vacancy in the LEAGUE Board.
1) resignation, 2) illness which prevents the Officer/Director from exe:uting the duties of the
office, 3) failure of the Officer /Director to continue as an officer of a Member unit of local
government, 4) removal from office, and 5) death. All Officers/Directors shall be expected to
attend Board meetings. Any vacancy in a LEAGUE' office shall be filled for the remainder of
the term by a person nominated by the president and approved by the Board, except that a vacancy
.in the office of President shall be filled by the Vice President. Removal of a LEAGUE
OfficerlDirector shall be initiated by at least four LEAGUE Officers/Directors, and shall' be
approved by a 2/3 majority of those Members present at the next meeting of the LEAGUE
membership. ..
ARTICLE IV
BOARD; DUTIES, POWERS! EMPLOYEES
Section 1. DUTIES. The Board as hereinabove described shall have the fOllOwing dudes:
(a) Control and man~ement of the property and assets of the LEAGUE;
(b) Authorization of LEAGUE expenditures;
(c) Direction of activities of the LEAGUE for the general benefit of Members;
(d) Supervision of the activities of the Coordinator; and
(6) Such other duties as are np,,~~ry to the operation of the LEAGUE.
4
e
9 #:L~090€t~~9
...€9 J.J.r~~
Wd€O:€ 98-9~-~
^lNno~ N019N:HSVM:^S ^J~
e
Section 2. POWERS. The Board shall have all powers necessary to effectively C311'Y out the
duties described in Section 1 of Article "N .
St"..ctlon 3. EMPLOYEES The Board shall have the right to employ, discharge7 and set
compensation for a Coordinatnr for the LEAGUE. Said Coordinator shall be selected by the
Pre3ident with the approval. of the Board, and ma.y be discharged by the President for cause- The
CoordinatOr shall attend all meetings of the BoaId and the general member3hip, but shall not have
the right to vote. He or she shall submit to the Board and the general membership at the Annual
Meetin~ a report on the past year's activities as wen as a suggested program of activities for the
forthcoming year. He or she sball act as secretary, of the LEAGUE. He or she may publish a
monthly newsletrer to provide Member:s and Associate members of the LEAGUE with important
and relevant information, and shall endeavor to keep the various media serving Ramsey County
as well as adjacent counties informed of the activities of the LEAGUE through news releases
authori7.edby the President.
ARTICLE V
MEETINGS
S~an 1. REGULAR l'vIEETINGS. Meeting5 of the LEAGUE shall be monthly at a time and
place fiXed by the Board, except that the Board may t with the approval of the majority of
members present at the April or May meetings in a given year, set a special schedule of meetings
during June through August in that year. The re~ular meetings of the LEAGUE shall consider
i~ues of importance and relevance to the Members as well as :my other LEAGUE business_
Section 2. ANNUAL 1\fEETINGS. De LEAGUE. shall hold an annual meeting in December
at a time and place flXed by the Board in lieu ot the regular December meeting which would
otherwise be held. It shall be the official business of the annual meeting to consider the report of
the Treasurer and the budget for the forthcoming year, to consider the annual report of the
President, and to elect LEAGUE Omcers/DireCtors fOf the fonhcoming yeu.
Section ~. SPECIAL :MEETINGS. Special meetings of the LEAGUE may be ealled by my five
Members or by the Board. Said Members or OfflC&SlDiIectors of the Board :shall give the
Coordinator written notice of their demand, which notice shall state the purpose of the special
meeting. .
s~tlon 4. NOTICE. Written norice of regular meetings, the annual meeting, and ~ial
meetinis shall be mailed at least seven days prior to the meeting date to all Members and
Delegates of record. Notice of special meetinas shall state the purpose of the meeting and shall
indicate at whose request the meeting has been =1led.
I.
s
Ii II ,. i I~ I~i I"III~,'" ',1, II, '=1
..r"r.l ~~~
\'ldtO:~ Qa-QL-L
^_Nnoo NO_~N:~S~~:^b ^~~
e
ARTICLE VI
COM:Ml'ITEES
~pn 1. LEGISLATIVE COMMlTI'EE. There shall be a standing committee on legislation
charged with reviewing legislation affecting the joint and several in~t.s of the :Members and
Associate members. Said committee shall, be chaired by the Vice President, and shall be
composed of the Vice President, the President, one other Member of the Board who shall not be
the Treasurer, and four other representatives of tbe membenbip. Of these four representatives.
two shall be elc:ctc:d officials and two shall be appointed officials. If Ramsey County or :my
school district within R3msey County are Members of the LEAGUE, at least one representative
of Ramsey County and one representative of a Ramsey County school district shall sit on the
LeguJative Committee. Members of the Legislative Committee shall be appointed by the
President with the approval of the Board. The Legislative Commitree shall:
(a) Attempt to coordinate legislative programs of Members, and attempt to resolve
conflicts in said proarams;
(b) Keep informed of activitic! of the Legislature regarding legislation of interest to
Members and Associate members; and
(c) Recommend the establishment of study committees on particular ledslative issues of
interest and importance to Members.' .
The Legisla1ive Committee sball consider legislation it considers important or legislation referred
to it for consideration by the Board and/or the membership.
~eetion 2. OTIIEK COMMITl'EES. The i30ard or the membership may establish such
committees as from time to time appear necessary to further the interests of the Membm. The:
President shall appoint the members of such committees with the appro~'al of the Board.
Membership on such committees shall not be limited in any way.
ARTICLE vn
QUORUM
~on 1. Nl1MBER.. The following number of Delegatest and OffiCCI'3lI>in':ctors, must bearepresented at any meeting to constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting any business:
(a) Board meetings: five (5) Officers/Directors;
(b) Regular or special meetings: forty percent (40%) of DelegateS;
(c)
Annual meetina: sixty percent (60%) of Delegates; and
6
el
r
L #:l.L090e'ZL9
~e9 HI~~
WdSO:E 96-9L-L
^lNno~ N019NIHS~M:^9 ^~~
- 'J
e
(d) Meetings at which the Charter is to be amended: seventy-five percent (75%) of
Delegates or their proxies.
Section 2. ATTENDANCE. Attendance at any m=ting to fulfill quorum requirements shall
mean attendance at any time during the course of the meeting.
ARTICLE "'1II
POLICY STATEMENTS
Section 1. LIMITATION ON OFFICERSIDIRECTORS. In the event the President or Board
takes a public position on a LEAGUE matter without specific approval of the Members it shall
be specifically stated to be. the opinion of the Pre3ident or the Board~ respectively.
~tion 2. APPROVAL BY :MEMBERSBIP. Any policy statement, recommendation,
c.riticismJ resolution, suggestion for legislative action or any other public stand on any issue must
be approved by a majority of Members at a LEAGUE meeting before such public statement can
be said to be a LEAGUE position. Whenever possible, such statement s."iall be either read at a
meeting of the membership prior to the meeting at which membership approval will be requested
or mailed to the membership seven days in advance of such meeting.
ARTICLE IX
DUES AND CONTRIBUfIONS .,.
Section 1. DUES. 'The fiscal year of the League shall be December 1 to November 30, and the
annual budget shall be set by the Board prior to<tb.e beginning of the fiscal year. Each member
unit of local government shall be charged dues in an amount which is a percentage of the annuai
budget. A new unit of local government which becomes a member of the LEAGUE shall be
required to pay dues prorated according to the time of year which they became members.
Each governmental subdivision may appropriate through its governing body, out of its general
fund. money to pay the annual dues and contribute funds to the LEAGUE to be used for research
and other projects of similar nature relating to problems common to the members. The actual. and
necessary ~pcn~ of the delegates of the governmental SUl:ldivisions may also be reimbursed out
of the general funds of the governmental subdivisions.
'The maximum amount of money paid by any Member to the LEAGUE, as dues, contributions or
otherwise shall not exceed:
(a)
A base of $100, plus;
e
7
g #:U090evZ~9
..e9 .:..:.I~~
WdSO:E 96-9l-~
^_Nno~ N019N:HS~M:^a ^~H
l .
(b) Five cents per capita based on the population of each respective city or town
accordina; to the Metropolitan Council population estimate of the year previous to the
establishment of dues; or
e
(c) An amount not to excee4 $2,000 tor Cities of the First Class (those cities having
more than 100,000 inhabit3nts); or
(d) An amount not to exceed $1,350 for Cities of the Second Class (those cities having
molt: than 20,000 inhabitants and not more than 100,000); or
(e) An amount not to exceed $1,200 for Cities of the Third Class (those cities having
more than 10,000 inhabitants and not more than 20.000); or
(f) An amount not to exceed $1,000 for Cities of the Fourth Class (those cities having
not more than 10,000 inhabitants); whichever is less.
(g) All other aovemmen1al subdivisions indicated in Article n, Section 1, will be
charged only the bue fee.
Associate members shall be charged the base fee of $25. {See Article il, Section 3.)
The dues for Ramsey County shall be determined by individual negotiation with the LEAGUE.
Each governmental. subdivision has the powers and duties provided by MinnCSQta State laws
1961, Chapter 728, for members of this LEAGUE.
Section 2 CONTRlBUTIONS. Special expenditures shall be authorized by the membership at
a membership meeting, and the amounts of -Member contributions to fund such special
expenditures shall be determined as set forth in Section 1 of Article IX. Associate members shall
be char~ed only for costs directly related to the m~g of LEAGUE materials to such Associate
members.
ARTICLE X
CHARTER AMENDMENT
S~ti.on L A..'lENDMENT. 'This Charter may be amended in part or in entirety by a three
quarters (3/4) vote of the Members represented at any meeting ot the membership, provided that
any proposed amendment has been included in full with the notice of the meeting.
Amendments are effec1ive for Ramsey County and each other subdivision subject to it upon its
approval by the governing body of the county or subdivision and compliance with Mirmaota
Statutes, Section 64S.021. For the purposes of this section the governing body of the town is the
town board.
8
-
8 #:1.~090€.~~9
..eel 1l!~~
Wd90:€ 98-9~-~
^_Nno~ NO~9N:HSVM:^g AOH
,
SUBCOMMITTEE CONSENSUS POINTS
DAKOTA COUNTY LEAGUE OF GOVERNMENTS
or
ANY OTHER NAME WE SO CHOOSE FOR THIS ORGANIZATION
puroose:
Designed to be initially limited in scope.
Central purpose would be twofold: the promotion
of intergovernmental relationships and to pursue
common legislative interests. These purposes
would be addressed, in part, by information
exchange and instituting forums to discuss issues
of mutual concern.
Membership:
To include representatives from the County, each
City, Townshio and School District. To also
include the Dakota County LegiSlative Delegation.
Meetincrs:
To take one or more of the following ideas:
- annual meetings
- regular Board meetings
periodic membership meetings
social opportunities
Governance:
Board of Directors made up of representatives of
overall membership.
Committees to be formed from general membership to
address issues of concern to the members.
I
I
, I
I
,
Staff:
No full time staff anticipated initially. Support
staff, contract or otherwise may, be needed.
Dues:
To be determined
Date of Oricrination:
1993
Office Location:
Somewhere in Dakota County
I.
I
'~
LEAGUE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS MEETING ATTENDANCE
e
TUESDA V, APRIL 30, 1996
7:00 P.M.
Larry Whitaker, Administrator, Afton
Linda Newell, Councilperson, Bayport
Frank Shusterich, Supervisor, Bay town Township
Jack Denzer, Mayor, Cottage Grove
Ray Daninger, Mayor, Forest Lake
Chip Robinson, Administrator, Forest Lake
Wyn John, Mayor, Lake Elmo
Karen Johnston, Councilperson, Lake Elmo
Rita Conlin, Councilperson, Lake Elmo
John Dooley, Councilperson, Lakeland
John Blahna, Mayor, Landfall
..
Henry DeWuske, Mayor, Mahtomedi
John Olinger, Administrator, Mahtomedi
Tracy Mazanec, Chair, May Township
Judy Woods, Councilperson, Newport
Barbara O'Neal, Mayor, Oak Park Heights
Bill Pulkrabek, Mayor, Oakdale
I Mari Moen, Councilperson, Oakdale
e
Jay Kimble, Mayor, Stillwater
Gene Bealka, Councilperson, Stillwater
Terry Zoller, Council person, Stillwater
David Francis, Supervisor, Stillwater Township
John McPherson, Chair, West Lakeland Township
Tom Vierling, Supervisor, West Lakeland Township
Chuck Wiger, Chair, School District 622
Ellen Gever, School District 624
AI Olson, Vice-chair, School District 833
Dr. Dave Wettergren, Superintendent, School District 834
Melva Radtke, Chair, School District 834
Senator Len Price
Representative Peg Larson
e
Dave Engstrom, Chair, Washington County Board of Commissioners
Myra Peterson, Commissioner, Washington County
Dennis Hegberg, Commissioner, Washington County
Wally Abrahamson, Commissioner, Washington County
Jim Schug, Administrator, Washington County
Sue Ladwig, Lobbyist, Washington County
..
M:\uadm\admengh\wp51\schug\att
.
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Dennie C. Hegberg
Dletrlct 1
Mery Heuser
Dietrict 2
COUNfY BOARD AGENDA
MAY 14, 1996, 9:00 A.M.
Welly Ab,.,hernaon
District 3
Myra Pete,.on
District 4
Dave Engstrom
ROLL CALL District S/Chelr
CONSENT CALENDAR
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - D. PAPIN, DIRECTOR
REAPPOINTMENT OF JON LARSON, VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT' SAFETY COMMITTEE -
PROCLAIM MAY 22 AS SEAT BELT AWARENESS DAY
COURT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - R. REETZ, DIRECTOR
RENEW CONTRACT WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR SECURE
JUVENILE DETENTION BED SERVICES
6. 9:20 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - J. SCHUG, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
7. 9:30 DISCUSSION FROM THE AUDIENCE
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
1. 9:00
2.
3. 9:00
4. 9:10
5. 9:15
8.
9.
9:45
10:30
10:40
TO
11:10
11:15
TO
11:45
11:45
1:00
TO
1:45
16.
1:50
TO
2:20
17.
2:30
\IJSITOIlS .wA r SHAIlE 7HUl CONCDINS WT1H 7JlE COllNTT lIalRD 01' COMJIISSIONFJIS ON ANY 11Vl Hf7T OH 7JlE AGDfIM. 71fE C1W1f WIU. DDlECT 71fE
COUNTY ADMINIS11fATO<< Tl) I'IIEI'AIIE ADnJNSD Tl) rollll CONCfJlNS. rou AIlE 1lVC0lllUGlZl HOrTl) liE a9ET11101JS OF PIlEVlOIJS SPEAXD!S AND ro
UMlT rollll ADDttD3 Tl) FIVE MINI/1ES.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS - COKHENTS - QUESTIONS
71IlS I'DUOO Of' 7DlE SHAU.lIE asm lIT11fE COMMISSIONFJIS ro fIEI'OI(TTl) THE FUU 60AIID ON COMJIl1TU ACT1YTT7ES. MAla COMMENTS ON.wA77EJlS
Of' 1N1nIFST AND fNf'_71ON. OIl MISE QlIES770NS Tl) 7JlE fiTAn'. 71US ArnON IS Nf7T 1NTF:NDElJ ro IIESlJLT IN SUIISTANTlVE lIalRD ArnON DlIllING
71US 7DlE. ANY ArnON NEC'ESSC<<r lIEGltGE Of'DlSCfISSION WlU.lIE SCHEDIIUD FOIl A Fll1VItE lIalRD Mttl1NG.
BOARD CORRESPONDENCE
EXECUTIVE (CLOSED) SESSION - R. ARNEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY-CLIENT CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS CURRENT
KRISTI AND JAMIE FORSTER LITIGATION
ADJOURN
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH THE COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD - ROOM B
WOODBURY LIBRARY FUNDING OPTIONS
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH HUHAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
A. REPORT - FRANK MADDEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING AGREEMENT
B. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPT.
BREAK FOR LUNCH
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
CHILD CARE SERVICES AND ISSUES FOR THE FUTURE
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
A. GREY CLOUD ISLAND PARK ACQUISITION STRATEGY
B. POTENTIAL SITING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH H.E.L.M. DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES CONCERNING RESOURCE RECOVERY SERVICES
***MEETING HOTICES LISTED ON BACK***
AuiMiw Ibtwriit(J *"ice. .. ..,.... '01.... in 1M c~ BOMd 1bNn.
If you _ _aNltCe dw ... dl8biIIty 01 ~ WrlM. ",.... call 4:JO./sOOO (TOO 439-32201
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
MAY 14, 1996
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
It
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
AUDITOR-TREASURER
ITEM
A.
APPROVAL OF ABATEMENT APPLICATIONS FOR HOMESTEAD
CLASSIFICATION, REDUCTION OF VALUE AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.
B. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION, TAX FORFEITED PARCEL UNDER 10 YEAR
PAYMENT PLAN BY LEONARD R. AND ELIZABETH FEELY.
C. APPROVAL OF NEW POSITION REQUEST AND FUNDING FOR A FULL-TIME
ELECTIONS/VOTER REGISTRATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
D.
APPROVAL OF COUNTY RE-CERTIFICATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
CASE #2204 TO PROVIDE ADULT FOSTER CARE SERVICES TO A RELATED
PERSON.
E. APPROVAL OF RULE 12 GRANT AWARD FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1996 AND 1997.
PUBLIC WORKS
F.
APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH BUELL'S INC. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $24,144.09 FOR THE SUPPLY OF PRODUCT AND
INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING ON CSAH 21 THROUGH THE COULEE IN
AFTON.
G. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION, CHANGE THE COUNTY ROAD DESIGNATION'
OF COUNTY ROAD 69 TO COUNTY ROAD 65 AND AUTHORIZE THE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO MAKE THE CORRESPONDING CHANGES
TO SIGNAGE.
H. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LAKE ELMO FOR CONSTRUCTION
ON CSAH 13.
I. APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS ON TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
CONSTRUCTION AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION
CONSTRUCTION AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
CSAH 12 AND CSAH 36.
..
RECORDER
J.
INFORMATION ONLY - RECORDER FEES FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL,
1996.
-coo.cot CaJeodar itana arc ,eaeral1y defmed u items of routine buaineu, not requiring discussion, and approved in ODe vote. Commilliooerl may elect to pun a Conseot
CaIeudar itcm(s) for discussioo and/or separate actiOll.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MEETING NOTICES
Date Comaittee Tiae Location
May 13 Design & Clustering Forum 6:30 p.m. Washington County Government Center
May 14 Interviews - Applicants for 8:15 a.m. Washington County Government Center
Brd. of Adjustment & Appeals
May 15 Plat Commission 9:30 a.m. Washington County Government Center
May 15 Legal Assistance 12:00 p.m. Cane Lakes - Stillwater
May 15 Transportation Advisory 2:00 p.m. 230 E. 5th St.-Mears Park Centre ~
May 15 Public Forum-Conserving the 4:00 p.m. 523 West marsh Street - Stillwater r
County's Rural Character
May 15 Workshop-Conserving the 5:45 p.m. Washington County Government Center
County's Rural Character
May 16 Metronet 12:00 p.m. 2324 University Avenue - St. Paul
May 16 Parks and Open Space 7:00 p.m. Washington County Government Center
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
MAY 21, 1996, 9:00 A.M.
Dennis C. Hegberg
District 1
Mary Hausar
District 2
Wally Abrahamson
District 3
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Myra Peterson
District 4
Dave Engstrom
District S/Chalr
1. 9: 00 ROLL CALL
2.
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. 9:00 B.E.L.M. DEPARTMENT - M. MCGLOTHLIN, DIRECTOR
RESOURCE RECOVERY ISSUES
4. 9:05 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - J. SCHUG, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
5. 9:15 DISCUSSION FROM THE AUDIENCE
VlSlI'ORS MAY SHARE 71lE1R CONCERNS W1IH THE COUNTY BOARD OF COMM/SS10NFNI ON ANY l1EM NOT ON THE AGENDA. THE CHAIR W1IL DIRECT THE
COUNTY ADMINJSTRATOR TO PREPARE RESPONSES TO YOUR CONCERNS. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED NOT TO BE REPETTT10US OF PREVIOUS SPEAKERS AND TO
UMlI' YOUR ADDRESS TO FIVE MINUTES.
6.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS - COMMENTS - QUESTIONS
1ll/S PERIOD OF TIME SHAlL BE USED BY THE COMM/SS10NE1lS TO REP()RT TO THE FVlL BOARD ON COMMlI'IEE ACl1Vl11ES. MAKE COMMENTS ON MATTERS
OF INTEREST AND INFORMATION. OR RAISE QUESTIONS TO THE STAFF. 11l1S AC110N IS NOT INIENDED TO RESULT IN SUBSI'AN17VE BOARD AC110N DURING
11l1S TIME. ANY AC110N NECESSARY BECAUSE OF DISCUSSION W1IL BE SCHEDULED FOR A FUIlJRE BOARD MEE'11NG.
7.
BOARD CORRESPONDENCE
8. 9: 30 ADJOURN
9. 9:40 BOARD WORKSHOP WITH OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION - ROOM B
TO
10:10 CERIDIAN RECREATION AREA
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MEE~ING NOTICES
Date
, eo_ittee
~iae
Location
May 21
May 21
May 22
May 22
May 23
May 23
Kay 23
Mental Health Advisory
Public Health Advisory
Mosquito Control Exec. Committee
Solid Waste Mgmt. Coord. Brd.
Community Corrections
Resource Recovery Project
Metro TAB
4:00 p.m.
5:30 p.m.
9:00 a.m.
10:30 a.m.
7:30 a.m.
8:30 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
Oakdale City Offices
Washington County Government Center
2099 University Ave. W. - St. Paul
2099 University Ave. W. - St. Paul
Washington County Government Center
6989 55th St. N., Suite C - Oakdale
230 E. 5th street-Mears Park Centre
AMative U_ning de"ice~ e", ."IIileble f", u.. in the County Boerrf Room.
If you need e__nee due II> d/abiIIry ", /enf1uet1e berriw. pIMa cell 43D-6000 (TOO 439-3220/
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
MAY 21, 1996
It
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
ADMINISTRATION
ITEM
A. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 7 AND 14, 1996 COUNTY BOARD MINUTES.
B. APPROVAL TO REAPPOINT RICHARD CALDECOTT AND ROBERT JENSON TO
THE CARNELIAN-MARINE WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM
EXPIRING JUNE 20, 1999.
AUDITOR-TREASURER
C. APPROVAL OF ABATEMENT
CLASSIFICATION.
APPLICATIONS
FOR
HOMESTEAD
D. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION, REPURCHASE OF T~X FORFEITED LAND BY
JOSEPH STEINMAUS, CONTRACT PURCHASER.
E. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION, CANCEL REPURCHASE CONTRACTS FOR DEED
WHICH ARE IN DEFAULT.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
F. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH "TWIN CITIES TREE TRUST" TO
PROVIDE SERVICES FOR 1996 SUMMER YOUTH PROGRAM.
COURT SERVICES
G. APPROVAL OF JUVENILE RESTITUTION GRANT PROGRAM FOR FY 1997.
H. APPROVAL OF CONTINUUM OF CARE GRANT FOR FY1997.
HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT AND
LAND MANAGEMENT
I. APPROVAL TO SUBMIT AN ASSIST GRANT APPLICATION TO THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR $23,000 TO REDUCE SMOKING
RATES IN WASHINGTON COUNTY.
HUMAN RESOURCES
J. APPROVAL TO ELIMINATE A SUPERVISORY CLASSIFICATION OF OFFICE
MANAGER AND REPLACE IT WITH A NEW LEAD WORKER CLASSIFICATION
OF HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR; APPROVAL OF NEW JOB
DESCRIPTION; APPROVAL TO CHANGE TITLE OF SR. HUMAN RESOURCES
SPECIALIST TO HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATE.
PUBLIC WORKS
i.
K. APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE PAYMENT OF DAMAGES, APPRAISAL FEES, AND
COURT ORDERED ATTORNEY FEES TO WILLIAM P. JENSEN, ELIZABETH
SCHMITZ AND HAROLD KIMMEL FOR CONDEMNATION OF LAND FOR THE
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER RETAINING WALL.
~.
L. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS FOR SEASONAL MATERIALS AND SERVICES
BID AWARDS FOR SEALCOATING, CHEMICAL WEED SPRAYING AND
CRACKSEAL CONDITIONED UPON THE EXECUTION OF CONTRACT AS
REQUIRED BY LAW.
-cOllJCllt CaleDdar items are ,eueraDy defmed AI items of routine busiDea, not requirinc dilcussion, and approved in ODe vOle. CommissiODen may elect to pull a Consent
Calendar item(l) for discussion lIIdIor separate actiOD.
-
'05/10/'36
12:44
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 542
[;101
tit
7\
AGENDA
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
MONDAY, May 13, 1996 -- 6:30 P.M.
6:30 AGENDA
I. Call To Order
II. Visitor CommentE~ Questions. or Concerns
1. Washington County Public Health Department -
Susanne Stensovelo - Tobacco Check Results
Enolosure 1 & lA
III. Departm~~t R~~Q~ta
1. Police 3. Parks 5. Administration
2. Utilities 4. Euilding 6. Cable
7. Water Management Organizations
8. Strategic Planning Committee
9. OPE Business Group
Enclosure 2 & 2A
IV. Consent Agenda (Roll Call Vote)
Enclosures 3, 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, & 3E
7:00 AGENDA
V. t.Tnt'i:ij~:;hed B'lsin~ss
1. . Computer Presentation - Tautges, Redpath
Enolosure 4
2. Council Compensation
Enclosure 5 & SA
3. Vierling Letter - zoning Deadlines for Agency
Actions
VI. Public Hearings
1. Casey & Michelle Kelly - Request for Variance -
Construction of an Additional Outbuilding - 14954 North
60th Street
Enclosure 6 & 6A
e
2. Robert & Lydia Wood - Request for Variance -
Construction of an Additional Outbuilding - 15075 65th
Street
Enolosure 7 << 7A
3. Proposed Parking Ordinance Change - Parking of
Company Vehicles Overnights on Company Parking Lata
Enclosure 8 << SA
05/1l2l/96
12:45
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO/542
GJ02
VII.
N.~w BU8ine~;1
l. Recycling Awards
Enclosure 9
-
2. Menards - Request for Extension of Conditional Use
Permit
~cloBure 10 & lOA
3. Zoning Ordinance & Comprehensive Plan Review -
Establieh a Council Workshop
Enclosure 11
4. 1996 Budget - 1st Quarter Summary
Enclosure 12
VIII.
Correspondence
1. League of Minnesota Cities Communications Plan
Enclosure 13
2. MNDOT Letter - Oakgreen & Hwy 36 Intersection
Enclosure 14
3. Minnesota DNR Permit Application #96-6164 Request
for Review & Comments
Enclosure 15
4. Minnesota DNR Permit Application #96-6165 Request
for Review & Comments
lmclosure 16
5. Robert L. Brackey Storm Sewer Brackey Addition
Enclosure 17
Adjournment:
Closed Meeting: The meeting will be closed for an update on
pending litigation.
e, I
. ,
~ ~:~~~~~~~~~n~~~~
e
Ie
May 8, 1996
TO: Members of the Minnesota Legislature, Local Elected Officials and Staff in the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area
The Metropolitan Council invites you to attend one of four Open HouselPublic Meetings
scheduled in May. The sessions are an opportunity for you to learn more about three growth
options for the Twin Cities region and, very importantly, give us informal feedback on your
reactions to them.
The meetings will be held May 21, 22, 29 and 30. Locations and times are on the enclosed flier.
The meetings will begin with an open house, with informal discussion around graphic displays of
the three options. This will be followed by a public meeting, where we want to find out what you
like--and don't like--about the options.
The sessions are among several ways the Council is encouraging local officials and the general
public to participate in shaping the region's growth. We are having discussions with local
governments and many other organizations. We will hold focus groups in June with local planning
commissioners, representatives from many organizations and the general public.
The Council will select a physical development plan for the region this summer. However, that
decision is but one step in the planning work. The Council will review and update its regional
transportation and water plans so they are consistent with the selected growth plan. We intend to
complete the updates by the end of the year.
We also will be reviewing the tools available to carry out the growth plan, and prepare legislative
recommendations if warranted. We will involve local government at each key stage of these
various planning efforts.
..
I hope you can join us at one of the sessions.
Sli--
Curt Johnson
Metropolitan Council Chair
Enc/one
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TOO/TIT 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780
An Equal Opportunity EmplDyer
e
Invitation
Open House
& Public Meeting
Regional Growth Options
The sessions are an opportunity to learn more about the
options and give the Metropolitan Council feedback.
Open House 7 to 7:30 p.m.
View sketches of the three options and other background materials.
Public Meeting 7:30 to 9 p.m.
Converse with Metropolitan Council members
about your ideas, reactio~ and questions.
Tuesday May 21 - St. Paul
Metropolitan Council Chambers
230 East 5th St.
Wednesday May 22 -- Plymouth
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Wednesday May 29 -- Apple Valley
Dakota County Western Service Center
14955 Galaxie Ave.
Thursday May 30 -- Shoreview
Shoreview Community Center
4600 North Victoria St.
For further information call the Regional Data Center at 291-8140.
e
,
~ Metropolitan Council
~ Workingfor the Region. P/Dnningfor the.Future
e
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council. its advismy and standing committees, and three
regional commissions: Metropolitan AiIports Commission, Metropolitan Fades and Open Space Commission, and Metropolitan
Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings should be
directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 and
by computer modem, through the Twin Cities Computer Network at 337-5400. Comments on Council issues can be made by
electronic mail at data.center@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public Comment Line at 291-6536.
DATE: May 10, 1996
WEEK OF: May 13 - May 17, 1996
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Environmental Services Public Information Meeting on Site Selection Process Wastewater Treatment
Plant - Monday, May 13, 7 p.m., School District #833 Board Room, District Service Center, 7362 E. Point
Douglas Rd. S., Cottage Grove.
Environment Committee - Tuesday, May 14,4 p.m., Chambers. The committee will consider: change in
provider for contracted project: "Historic and Modern Accumulation of Phosphorus in Lake Pepin Sediments";
approval of grant of easement on Metropolitan Council property to Scott County for storm sewer purposes;
construction contract change order greater than 5% or $50,000 and change order no. 8, Blaine interceptor;
Environmental Services quarterly report; and other business.
Chair's Small Group Breakfast Meeting - Wednesday, May 15, 8 a.m., SheratonlMidway, Bigelow's
Restaurant, 1-94 at Hamline, St. Paul.
Livable Communities Demonstrations Account Applicant Workshop - Wednesday, May IS, 8:30 - noon,
Woodbury City Hall, 8301 Valley Creek Rd., Woodbury.
Special Meeting: Providers Advisory Committee - Thursday, May 16, 10:30 am., 7th floor conference
room. The committee will discuss TRIM implementation.
Finance Committee - Thursday, May 16,4 p.m., Room 2A The committee will consider: approval of request
for proposals to scope the regional park system user interview study; approval to change meeting day for Finance
Committee; approval of closed meetings of the Finance Committee to discuss labor negotiation issues; approval
of closed meetings of the Finance Committee to discuss pending or imminent litigation involving personal injury
and work compensation claims; discussion of policy on public purpose of Metropolitan Council expenditures;
briefing on Diversity Benchmarking Project; and the other business. The next portion of the meeting may be
closed to the public pursuant to MN Statutes section 471. 70S, subdivision la for discussion oflabor
negotiations. The meeting may be reopened to the public following the labor negotiations discussion.
Livable Communities Demonstrations Account Applicant Workshop - Friday, May 17, 8:30 - noon,
Golden Valley City Hall, 7800 Golden Valley Rd., Golden Valley.
e
Great River Celebration sponsored by Minnesota Pollution ControlAgency, Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services, City of St. Paul, City of Minneapolis, City of South St Paul, MinnesotalWisconsin
Boundary Area Commission, National Park ServicelMississippi National River Recreation Area - Friday, May
17, 1 1 a.m. - 2:30 p.m., Harriet Island, St. Paul. The Celebration is commemorating the completion of the Sewer
Separation Program in the Twin Cities and includes an environmental fair, exhibits, program, music and
refreshments.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St, St Paul. Meeting times and agenda
are subject to change. For more information or confirmation of meetings, call 291-6447, (TDD 291-0904). Call
the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 for news of Council actions and coming meetings.
e
TENTATIVE MEETINGS THE WEEK OF MAY 20 THROUGH MAY 24,1996
Community Development Committee - Monday, May 20, Noon, Room lA
Transportation Committee - Monday, May 20, 4 p.m., Chambers.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Tuesday, May 21, 7-9 p.m., Chambers.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, May 22, 8 a.m., Nicollet Island Inn, 95 Merriam St., Minneapolis.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee - Wednesday, May 22, 8:30 a.m., Room lA
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Wednesday, May 22, 7-9 p.m., Plymouth City Hall,
3400, Plymouth Blvd., Plymouth.
Transportation Advisory Board Policy Committee - Thursday, May 23, 12:30 p.m., Room lA
Metropolitan Council- Thursday, May 23, 4 p.m., Chambers.
Committee of theWhole - Thursday, May 23, 5 p.m. or immediately following the Council meeting, Room lA
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILmES COMMISSION
Finance Committee - Tuesday, May 14, 10 a.m., Metrodome, Commission conference room, 900 S. 5th St.,
Minneapolis. The committee will consider: 1995 audit; Bloomington land sale update; and other business.
,.
Intergovernmental Relations Committee - Tuesday, May 14, 11 a.m., Metrodome, Commission conference
room, 900 S. 5th St, Minneapolis. The committee will consider the 1996 legislative overview and other
business.
Commission Meeting - Wednesday, May 15,9:30 a.m., Metrodome, Commission Conference Room, 900 S.
5th St., Minneapolis. The Commission will consider: The Rowland Company report; updates on projects;
approve bid/award contract for Plaza project bid pack 5 for directional signage; approve bid and award contract
for Plaza project bid pack 4 for Trivisions; award elevator maintenance contract; 1996 audit; Bloomington land
sale update; 1996 legislative overview; and other business.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415.
All meetings are held in the Commission office conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting times and
agendas occasionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Judy Somers, 335-3310.
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIES COMMISSION FOUNDATION
Foundation Meeting - Tuesday, May 14, Noon, Metrod.ome, 900 S. 5th St., Minneapolis. The foundation will
consider: the audit; 1996 work plan; consultants; and other business.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission Foundation office is located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis,
MN 55415. To verify meeting information, please call Judy Somers, 335-3310.
_I
J . J
,
e.
.
.
F~;:y,., ~rl~ /':;~ ."
,\~ \:,,' r,',l:l
", ,.J !J
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan COlDlcil, its advisory and standing committees,
and three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission,
and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about
meetings should be directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro
Information Line at 229-3780 and by computer modem, through the Twin Cities Computer Network at 337-5400.
Comments on Council issues can be made by electronic mail at datacenter@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public
Comment Line at 291-6536.
DATE: May 17, 1996
WEEK OF: May 20 - May 24, 1996
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Community Development Committee - Monday, May 20, Noon, Room IA The committee will consider:
Metro GIS--intent statement, interim decision-making structure, and guidelines for interim agreements and
pilot programs; funding recommendations for the local housing incentive account program; partnership with
the Family Housing Fund of Minneapolis and St. Paul; Rural Area Policy tools for guiding rural growth and
summary of local and adjacent county interviews; housing resources technical assistance; and other business.
Transportation Committee - Monday, May 20, 4 p.m., Chambers. The committee will consider: 1-394 lane
add approval; approval of Woodbury Transit Plan; MSP runway 4/22 noise mitigation survey contract
amendment; Transportation Policy Plan public participation process; Metro Mobility update; and other
business.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Tuesday, May 21, 7-9 p.m., Chambers.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, May 22, 8 a.m., Nicollet Island Inn, 95 Merriam St., Minneapolis.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Wednesday, May 22, 7-9 p.m., Plymouth City Hall,
3400 Plymouth Blvd, Plymouth.
Transportation Advisory Board Policy Committee - Thursday, May 23, 12:30 p.m., Room lA The
committee will consider: transportation impacts of regional growth options; Hwy. 212 toll project proposal;
congestion pricing as a funding alternative; discussion of additional information desired from transit user
survey presentation; and other business.
Metropolitan Council- Thursday, May 23, 4 p.m., Chambers. The council will consider: Chaska 2000
comprehensive plan amendment; change in provider for contracted project: "Historic and Modern
Accumulation of Phosphorus in.Lake Pepin Sediments"; approval of grant easement on Metropolitan Council
proerty to Scott County for storm sewer purposes; request for authorization to enter into a contract with the
MN Department of Health to implement a housing subsidy and emergency grant program for persons with
IDV/AIDS; authorization to enter into a lease agreement at the Metro 94 Business Center; customer
inducements to refer part time drivers; approval of request for proposals to scope out the regional park
system user interview study; Metropolitan Council actions for implementing regional park system capital
improvements; Lino Lakes comprehensive plan amendment, MUSA expansion 150 net acres; Stillwater
comprehensive plan revision; construction contract change order greater than 5% or $50,000, MCES project
no. 865600 and change order no. 8, Blaine interceptor; 1-394 lane add approval; approval of Woodbury
Transit Plan; MSP Runway 4/22 Noise Mitigation Survey contract amendment; initiation of Metropolitan
Significance Review; report on MAClEden Prairie negotiations regarding Flying Cloud Airport long term
comprehensive plan; and other business.
Committee of the Whole - Thursday, May 23, 5 p.m. or immediately following the Council meeting, Room
IA. The committee will consider the review and update of Growth Options and regional strategy.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St, St Paul. Meeting times and
agenda are subject to change. For more information or confirmati.onofmeetings, call 291-6447, (TDD 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 for news of Council actions and coming meetings.
TENTATIVE MEETINGS THE WEEK OF MAY 27 THROUGH MAY 31, 1996
MEMORIAL DA YIHOLIDA Y. Monday, May 17, Council offices are closed.
Joint Meeting of Environment Committee and Community Development Committee - Tuesday, May
28, 3 p.m., Chambers.
Environment Committee - Tuesday, May 28, 4 p.m., Chambers.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Tuesday, May 28, 4 - 5:30 p.m., Washington Co.
Board and Washington Co. Communities, Government Center, 216 N. 4th St, Stillwater.
Transportation Advisory Board - Wednesday, May 29,2 p.m., Chambers.
Information Meeting on the "Draft" 1997-1000 Transportation Improvement Program (as part of the
Transportation Advisory Board meeting) - Wednesday, May 29, 2:10 p.m., Chambers.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Wednesday, May 29, 7-9 p.m., Dakota Co. Western
Service Center, 14955 Galaxie Ave., Apple Valley.
Growth Options Open House and Public Meeting - Thursday, May 30, 7 - 9 p.m., Shoreview Community
Center, 4600, N. Victoria St., Shoreview.
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION
Commission Meeting - Monday, May 20, I p.m., Room 303, West Mezzanine, Lindbergh Terminal
Building. The commission will consider: recommendation for airport leases; May ADNE levels; final
contract payments for 1995 airside bituminous construction at MSP, regionallHHH terminal flooring
improvements, Southwest Terminal expansion--general, mechanical, and electrical, Phase ill primaIy
electrical distribution system-switchgear; 1993-95 Part 150 sound insulation program; contract bids received
for New Ford TownlRich Acres asbestos abatement/demolition, 1996 pavement rehabilitation and deer fence
\. , \
~
..
.
.1
I
e.
.
.
,
at Anoka Co./Blaine Airport, Part 150 SOWld Insulation Program for April bid cycle; ratification of
acceptance of grant offer; review of upcoming construction project bids; 1995 Part 150 Sound Insulation
Program survey results; Flying Cloud Airport long term comprehensive plan-Metropolitan Council approval;
dual track airport planning process next steps; Tour of Southwest Termina1IFIS/GTClULR development;
first quarter budget variance; request to purchase sealant materials; bids received for purchase of US.
currency change machine; contract for auto rental shuttle; request to receive bids for six cubic yard garbage
packer; request to bid for elevator/escalator maintenance contract; bid results for aerial lift truck; request for
proposals for insurance broker; request for qualifications for land use and land acquisition legal services;
release and tennination agreement with Imperial Parking; parking presentation; reliever airports--tenant cost
of operation; interpretation of MAC ordinance no. 79; committee reorganization; implementation of House
File 2321-MSP parking policy; Dr. Schmidt request; update on illegal operators; post employment results;
internal and concessionaire audit summaries; Kathy's Construction Inc.; short-term auto parking; resolution
of appreciation for Commissioner O'Neil; election oftreasurer-nomination--Denise Kautzer; Northwest
Airlines presentation; federal issues; Bureau of Mines expansion opportunities; Southwest Terminal
concession presentation; and other business.
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For
more information, call Lynn Sorensen at 726-8186.
~ I.:; . '" ... .
.. .
Stillwater Township
May 23, 1996
FYI'
..
~Ji(:
Takemoto
7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
Agenda: Adopt
Minutes: Approve Minutes - May 9, 1996.
Treasurer: Report, Claims & Checks
Attorney: 1. Radio Claim /0 ;
2. Rivard Litigation If);uL - (w~
~anner:
Engineer: 1. Draft Permit Letter e
fybJic WorJ<s: 1. Benshoof Letter
CI!~ 1. Miscellaneous
.
.
Committees: 1. Park Recommendations
2. Browns Creek letter
PeoDle - 8:30 PM: 8:30 Peace Officer
8:45 Dan Parker re: the new school?
9:00 Parchetta
Old Business:
1. Annexation
New Business:
Note:
e.
5/19/96
Pat Bantli
t.
.
.
Lower St. Croix Planning Coordination Office
117 Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-439-7122
Il~J
JW"~'''''Z~~'>''''i:.''
- -
TO:
Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force
Local Government Representatives
Interagency Contacts
Buck Malick, Chair, Lower St. Croix Planning Task Forc&}A
Kate Hanson, Planning coordinatortf!
Wednesday, May 15, 1996
FROM:
DATE:
This is to remind you of the upcoming meeting to learn more about long-term
plans for transmission, pipeline and highway crossings of the Lower St. Croix National
Scenic Riverway. This meeting, like all task force sessions, is open to anyone who is
interested in attending. The meeting is scheduled for:
When:
Thursday, May 30, 1996
7:00 - 10:00 p.m.
Where:
Phipps Center for the Performing Arts, Auditorium
109 Locust Street, Hudson, Wisconsin
The topic of river crossings may be of interest to a lot of people not involved
in the task force, so we've arranged to use the auditorium at the Phipps.
At the request of the task force, the planning team has arranged for
presentations on future crossings of powerlines, pipelines and highways. We'll be
hearing from Northern States Power Company, Wisconsin Public Service Commission,
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, Federal Highway Administration, Minnesota
and Wisconsin Departments of Transportation, and the Metropolitan Council.
At its May 1 meeting, the task force asked that the planning team compile a
proposal for topics and dates for two meetings a month during the summer. We'll
have a proposal to distribute for your consideration at the May 30 meeting, and we've
tentatively scheduled a meeting for June 10 to discuss the proposal and to follow up
on our May 30 river crossings session.
Thanks again to all of you who continue to commit your time and good thinking
to the task force. The newsletter outlining results of the April 8-11 planning sessions,
which was mailed earlier this week, is a measure of our progress to date. At the river
crossings meeting, we will begin to examine some specific concerns the plan will need
to address. We look forward to seeing you May 30--and please extend an invitation
to others who might have interest in the to.pic of river crossings.
.~
.
.
May 1 7, 1 996
Jay Kimble, Mayor
City of Stillwater
216 N. Third st.
STillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Mr. Mayor:
I recently met with City Planner, Sue Fitzgerald, to review
the proposed plan to improve Pioneer Park (5.1.96, Phase I).
I will be unable to attend the next public meeting to review
the proposed plan but I want to support the many concepts
incorporated in the above proposal.
I am impressed with the fact so many concepts have been included
in such a small park space (i.e. improved playground area,
improved picnic shelters, improved historic designations, river
views, green space, plantings, and the new multi-purpose pavil-
ion). I am especially impressed that the present parking area
will be used to maximize primary park use of that space with
minimal space set aside on the north end to serve as a drop-
off and pick-up purpose.
I appreciate all of the thoughtfulness that has gone into the
planning thus far.
Sincerely,
~~~
G. Dean Miller
622 North Third st.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
41
W Metropolitan Council
~ , - ... \\brktmlj(Jr f'll~ R(~inll. PIHllIzillfl.fnr rhe FlLluTe
, ,
e
Mears Park Centre
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul. Minnesot. 5510 1-163~
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
U,S, POSTAGE
PAID
SI. Paul, MN
Perrnlt No. 7029
ate
I
- - - - - - - - - - .-
REGIONAL BLUEPRINT
MORLI liE LOON
CLERK
CITY OF STILLIIATER
216 4TH ST N
STILLIIATER MH 55082.4898
X 11986
ME1559B
l~
Recycled paper: Contains at least 20% post-consumer \~\lstt.': ~l)\'.bas('d In:';'
and job locations in a pattern
designed to be friendly to
transit and pedestrians.
Some centelS would spring up
on vacant land, while othelS
would be located on
redeveloped sites in the older
part of the region. The
development pattern would
respond primarily to job
locations.
A Hybrid Option?-A mixture
of growth characteristics from
each growth option, or a
hybrid, is likely to emerge.
c COST ESTIMATES
,
The cost chart (see other
side) shows public sector
costs for the three options,
ranging from an estimated
~11 billion to $13.3 billion.
Toty include regional and
local ~ta1 costs for
transpoilation, sewers, water
and storm a..;elS between
now and the ~ 2020.
The larger the ar~f
development, the gr~r the
public cost for highwa~,
sewelS and water. \
May 1996
. c ABOUT THIS ISSUE
This issue of Update has
information on the estimated
regional and local costs of
three growth and
development options the
Metropolitan Council is
considering. Costs include
regional and local costs of
highways, transit, sewelS,
water and stormwater
facilities to the year 2020.
.
In addition, this issue
describes ways organizations
and the public can tell the
Council what they like--or
dMke-.boiWhe options, or
suggest character!flics m.ey
would like to see in a bYbri"-t
option.
c THE THREE OPTIONS
C~ntTRnd-Growth
would be accommodated
through continued expansion
of the urban area in all
directions. This development
pattern is market-driven,
responding primarily to
housing location market
forces.
Concentrated Development-
New growth would be located
largely in the existing urban
area. Growth would fill in
vacant land and land available
through redevelopment, such
as cleanup of polluted sites.
-,-, .-....,,----..-.--.-.,... ".../.--.---
Housing density would
increase and some
redevelopment would mix
housing and retail in shared
locations. Central sewer and
water would not expand much
beyond what we have today.
e
Growth Centers-- "Mixed use"
centelS would commingle
housing with retail business
Loca1 facilities are paid by \
residents of the local area.
while regional costs are \
generally paid by all1\vin
Citians. Highways are paid by ,
residents of the county, and
oftentimes by all state
residents.
,
I
Simple arithmetic shows a I
difference of S23 billion
between the high-and low- I
cost option. The huge
difference suggests cost will
be important in selecting a I
growth option for the region. .
o Regional Costs Are Close .
Surprisingly, the regional I
I
,
,
facilities portion of costs do
not vary dramatically among
the options.
The regional sewer tab
doesn't vary greatly among
the options because most
pipes are already in place.
Also, the focus of the
pro .
on imp
expansi
Treatm
broad g
~~;<~'N;'<;~ "<"}; .'
Similarly, regional highway
costs don't vary greatly among
the options. Again, most of
the system is already in place
or planned to serve growth in
the developing suburbs. These
suburbs would continue to
grow rapidly under all three
options.
The lion's share of capital
expenditures is earmarked to
repair and upgrade existing
facilities.
Nevertheless, there is a
difference of S246 million
between the highest and
lowest estimated cost for
regional transportation and
interceptor sewelS among the
three options.
o Transportation Impacts
The options also differ in the
likely patterns of travel (see
other side). While numbelS
represent small percentages,
the direction of the trend is
imponant. The numbelS will
REGIONAL BLUEPRINT.
.. ,'-'-'-'-~---.. ---'-'--'--~--,_.-------
become more significant as
the development option takes
hold beyond 2020. Depending
on the option selected. the
length of automobile trips
will shonen. In addition, the
region could reduce its
dependence on the car by
making pedestrian and transit
trips more appealing.
D OTHER ACTIVITIES
UNDER WAY
The Council is reviewing its
current rural area policy and
investigating the overall fiscal
implications of development
in the region. The activities
are imponant pieces of the
larger picture.
D WAYS YOU CAN
PARTICIPATE
Come to an open house. The
Council invites you to attend
any of four informational
open houses and community
meetings in May. During the
open house, you can brush up
on growth issues, review
design sketches of the options
and talk informally with
Council rnernben; and staff.
Immediately after each open
house, the Council will meet
with the public and local
officials from the area to
discuss the options.
The meeting dates and
locations: (Each meeting is
from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.)
Tuesday, May %1,
Metropolitan Coundl
Chambers, Mears Park
Centre. 230 Eo Flllh St., In
downtOwn St. Paul.
Wednesday, May 22,
Plymouth City Hall, 3400
Plymouth Blvd., Plymouth
Wednesday, May 29,
Dakota County Western
Service Center, 14955 Galaxie
Av., Apple Valley
Thursday, May 30,
Shoreview Community
Center, 4600 N. Victoria St.,
Shoreview
,
,
G~ Information on growth
IssJh. Call the Regional '
Data <(nter at 291-8140 and
ask for a free copy of Growth
Options .(as the Twin Cities
Metropolitan Ana, containing
background'\nformation on
growth trends,
Call or c-mall is, You can
call the Counci'Public
Comment Line 111291-6356
with your commalls. Our
TIY number is 131-0904. Or
e-mail us at I
data.unlu@mt!tc.~att!.mlLus
Please get your cdlnments to
us by June 21. I
Schedule a speakv. Call
Donna Mattson dt the
Council staff at ?,,91-6493 to
make arrangemelts for a
presentation oq.growth issues
to your organilltion, or for
more informfon on the
open houses.
I
I
I
,
tit
GROWTH OPTION COSTS VARY BY $2.3 ~
WATERlSEWERSISTORMWATER ~SPORTATION
Regienal
Interceptors
Maintenance
Re~np1
Quatr'ty
-
.... -
Current SI62 million S 2 billion
Trend
Concentrated SI16 million S 2 billion
Development
Growth SI33 million S2 billion
Centen
*Numbers are rounded and may be refined,
"Assumes current service levels
Local
, Regional
TOTAL*
Local
Transit*"
Roads
S 3.1 billion
S6.4 billion
Daily Miles Daily Miles or
Traveled Transit TripI Congested Roads
Current
Trend 74.2 milfion 257,000 623
Concentrated
Development 73.6 million 263,000 587
Growth
Centen 72,6 million 310,000 566
S 1.3 billion
S6,3 billion
S2 billion
S6.2 billion
TRANSPORTATION IMPAcrS
41
Upon request. this publication will be made available
in alternative formats to people with disabilities,
612 291-6359 TIY 291-0904
REGIONAL BLUEPRlfn.
e
It
I
May 9, 1996
STILLWATER TOWN BOARD MEETING
Town Hall
7:30 P.M.
PRESENT:
Chairperson Jack Takemoto; Supervisors Louise
David Francis, Jerry Hicks and David Johnson.
Attorney Tom Scott, Engineer Paul Pearson and
Warren Erickson.
Bergeron,
Also,
Treasurer
1. AGENDA - M/S/P Bergeron/Francis moved to adopt the agenda as
amended. (5 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Hicks/Bergeron moved to approve the 4/24/96
Annexation Meeting minutes as written. (5 ayes)
M/S/P Francis/Hicks moved to approve the 4/25/96 Town Board Meeting
minutes as written. (5 ayes)
M/S/P Hicks/Francis moved to approve the 5/1/96 Town Board Meeting
minutes as written. (4 ayes, Bergeron, abstain)
3. TREASURER - Treasurer Warren Erickson submitted his written
report.
4. HUNTER'S RIDGE - Attorney Tom Scott reviewed the changes in
the deve I opmen t con tract. Eng i nee r Pau I Pearson desc r i bed the
proposed barricade at the unimproved part of Quai I Avenue and 119th
Street and there was discussion about how to deter traffic from
going around the diamond signs.
M/S/P Francis/Bergeron moved to approve the final plat with the
condition that the Attorney is authorized to release the plat when
all conditions in the development contract are met, i.e., the
escrow account, letter of credit and payment of park dedication
fee. (5 ayes)
"
5. AHA PROPERTY - Louise Bergeron advised that Mr. Aha is having
problems with erosion in his front yard and would I ike to bring in
some boulders and black dirt across the Township trai I. The Clerk
wi II send a letter advising him that it should be done within a
reasonab let i me (before the end of the month) and that he is
responsible for any damage done to the trai I.
6. TOM ST. CLAIR - Mr. St. Clair would I ike to pick rocks from
the ditch to put on his property. Attorney Scott did not forsee
any I iabi I ity concerns.
M/S/P Bergeron/Johnson moved that the Township pol icy should be to
al low people to remove rocks from ditchs after obtaining permission
from both the Town Board and the adjacent land owner. (5 ayes)
M/S/P Bergeron/Hicks moved to approve Mr. Sc Clair's request and
Supervisor Bergeron wi I I notify him. (4 ayes, Takemoto, nay)
Sti I Iwater Town Board Meeting - 5/9/96
Page Two
e
7. CHECKS AND CLAIMS - Claims #962 through #968 and claim #970
and #971 were approved for payment.
M/S/P Hicks/Bergeron moved that the Thomas Radio claim (#969) be
removed and tabled for discussion at the next meeting. (4 ayes,
Francis, nay)
8. BROWN'S CREEK WMO - David Francis had drafted a letter
outl ining the Town Board's support for the BCWMO.
M/S/P Johnson/Hicks moved to authorize the Chair to sign the letter
when prepared on Township letterhead with the changes noted. (5
ayes) .
9. PLANNING COMMISSION TRAINING SEMINARS - The material from the
Planning Commission seminars wi I I be dupl icated for distribution
to the Planning Commission.
10. PROETZ LETTER - M/S/P Bergeron/Hicks moved to send a letter
to Mr. Proetz enclosing the pages he had given the Town Board and
a copy of the minutes of 4/25/96 Board of Review wherein unanimous
approval was given to the Board of Review recommendation from the
County aud i tors. (5 ayes)
M/S/P Hicks/Bergeron moved that the Attorney should address the
Apri I 29 and Apri I 30 letters and enclose a copy of the minutes of
April 11 (item #8) reflecting the Board action. (5 ayes)
11. PAUL TATTING - Mr. Tatting, who works with Dennis O'Donnel I
at Washington County was present. The Town Board wanted to bring
him up to date with respect to the Township ordinances. Mr.
Tatting explained the procedure he fol lows with respect to tree
removal. He wi I I communicate to the Board the final resolution on
the McKenzie issue.
He also reported on the Oie property. The unlicensed vehicles have
been removed.
He also referred to a noise problem with a dirt bike on South Twin
Lake.
12. TOM RADIO - ALLEGATIONS - Tom Radio was present to discuss
the Johnson al legations. He pointed out that the Data Practices
Act does not apply to Townships. Also, with respect to the Open
Meeting Law, there is an exception under which a meeting can be
closed when there is threatened litigation. An additional
exception is if al legations are made against an employee under the
Town Board's control. Therefore, the meeting was properly closed.
Regard i ng the pet I t ion, Mr. Rad I 0 exp I a i ned the process of the
investigation, which was that from the Abramowitz letter, they
determined who should be interviewed and they found no factual
support for the al legations.
e.
~ I
e
Sti I Iwater Town Board Meeting - 5/9/96
Page Th re'e
Ed Otis requested that In the
of materials of agenda Items.
process that the Town Board
al legations.
future, the Township provide copies
He also stated his objections to the
has fo I lowed wit h respect to the
David Johnson reviewed the al legations against him.
Louise Bergeron moved that the Board release the findings of Tom
R a d i 0 0 nth e a I leg a t ion sag a ins t D a v i d J 0 h n son. ( mo t ion fa i led for
lack of a second)
13. NEW SCHOOL - Dan Parker was present from the school district
to discuss a joint effort with the City and Township to come up
with a plan of operation and a timet ine for the new school to be
bui It at County Roads 12 and 15. He wi I I contact the Planner and
perhaps have an update for the next meeting.
14. DRAFT PERMIT LETTER - DNR - The Planner/Engineer wi I I look at
the letter to see if action Is needed.
15. DRAFT ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
Attorney Scott were discussed by
suggestion #18 - leave at 5
suggestion #19 - okay
suggestion #31 - Parks are dedicated as part of plats - add
suggested language with respect to the larger piece (in
Springcreek)
suggestion #33 - Penthouse Acr~~ detachment is a separage
issue from the Annexation Agreement.
M/S/P Hicks/Bergeron moved to have the Attorney draw
up a letter requesting the Sti I Iwater City Counci I
consider the Penthouse Acres area be brought back
into Sti Ilwater Township. (5 ayes)
- The sugges t ions ou t lined
the Town Board:
years
by
16. ADJOURNMENT - M/S/P Hicks/Bergeron to adjourn the meeting.
(5 ayes). The meeting was adjourned at 11 :25 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
e
Approved
Lower St. Croix Planning Coordination Office
117 Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-439-7122
e
TO:
DATE:
Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force
Local Government Representatives
Interagency Contacts
Buck Malick, Chair, Lower St. Croix Planning Task Forc&;1A
Kate Hanson, Planning Coordinato!{tf
Wednesday, May 15, 1996
FROM:
This is to remind you of the upcoming meeting to learn more about long-term
plans for transmission, pipeline and highway crossings of the Lower St. Croix National
Scenic Riverway. This meeting, like all task force sessions, is open to anyone who is
interested in attending. The meeting is scheduled for:
When:
Thursday, May 30, 1996
7:00 - 10:00 p.m.
Where:
Phipps Center for the Performing Arts, Auditorium
109 Locust Street, Hudson, Wisconsin
The topic of river crossings may be of interest to a lot of people not involved
in the task force, so we've arranged to use the auditorium at the Phipps.
At the request of the task force, the planning team has arranged for
presentations on future crossings of powerlines, pipelines and highways. We'll be
hearing from Northern States Power Company, Wisconsin Public Service Commission,
Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, Federal Highway Administration, Minnesota
and Wisconsin Departments of Transportation, and the Metropolitan Council.
At its May 1 meeting, the task force asked that the planning team compile a
proposal for topics and dates for two meetings a month during the summer. We'll
have a proposal to distribute for your consideration at the May 30 meeting, and we've
tentatively scheduled a meeting for June 10 to discuss the proposal and to follow up
on our May 30 river crossings session.
Thanks again to all of you who continue to commit your time and good thinking
to the task force. The newsletter outlining results of the April 8-11 planning sessions,
which was mailed earlier this week, is a measure of our progress to date. At the river
crossings meeting, we will begin to examine some specific concerns the plan will need
to address. We look forward to seeing you May 30--and please extend an invitation
to others who might have interest in the topic of river crossings. e,
IBradsha~
CrcCl/i/lf) Meaningful Euents Thor Ce/t'bf(lte Life '"
............
e
Funeral & Cremation Services
You are cordially invited to attend a
Celebration and Dedication
honoring the former owners of our funeral home
who so generously devoted their careers
to serving our community.
Wednesday, l\tlay 22nd, 1996 from 2:00 P.M. to 3:30 P.M.
Bradshaw Jones Funeral Home
6061 North Osgood Avenue, Stillwater
439-5511
at which time we will honor
Hugh Jones
Earl W. Jones
.'
Lawrence O. Hauge
There will be a brief dedication ceremony,
refreshments, music and tours of the building.
Please join us in celebrating our rich heritage
and acknowledging the numerous contributions
of those who gave so much.
Building upon this strong heritage, we at Bradshaw continue to serve this community by
"Creating Meaningful Events That Celebrate LifeSM."
e
6061 Osgood Avenue North. Stillwater, MN 55082 · 612-439-551 1 · Fax 612-439-0513
Our proud Heritage · Jones Funeral Home
Dedication Ceremonies
~onday May 20th 10:00 - 11:30 A.M.
Bradshaw Devlin Funeral Home, 488 Humboldt
Avenue, Saint Paul where we will honor Henry M.
Devlin, Thomas W. Tosney, John J. Devlin, Leonard
G. and Helen D. Lang, and Lawrence O. Hauge.
Monday May 20th 2:00 - 3:30 P.M.
Bradshaw Carlson Funeral Home, 1174 Payne
Avenue, Saint Paul where we will honor Carl A.
Carlson, Albert W. Tillquist, Harry D. Munson,
Clifford B. Livingston, Thomas R. Beigle, and
George L. Canon.
Tuesday May 21st 10:00 - 11:30 A.M.
Bradshaw Listoe-Wold Funeral Home, 678 South
Snelling Avenue, Saint Paul where we will honor
William Dampier, Lyman S. Baird, Frederick C.
Listoe, N.P. Wold, N.O. Welander, Walter P. Quist,
Fred W. Johnston, Bruce F. Johnston, Raymond G.
and Mildred W. Hansen, James Hultgren, and
Allen G. Vevang.
Tuesday May 21st 2:00 - 3:30 P.M.
Bradshaw McDivitt-Hauge Funeral Home, 3131
Minnehaha Avenue, Minneapolis where we will
honor M.H. McDivitt, Roy T. Patterson, Lawrence O.
Hauge, Barney Anderson, Walter P. Leland, Roger L.
Hauge, Roger W. Challman, Leonard P. Geirke, and
Richard M. Walsh.
Wednesday May 22nd 10:00 - 11:30 A.M.
Bradshaw Adam Funeral Home, 1078 Rice Street,
Saint Paul where we will honor John Adam, AlfredJ.
Adam, and Lawrence O. Hauge.
Wednesday May 22nd 2:00 - 3:30 P.M.
Bradshaw Jones Funeral Home, 6061 North Osgood
Avenue, Stillwater where we will honor Hugh Jones,
Earl W. Jones, and Lawrence O. Hauge.
e
Questions
and Answers
Concerning
Funeral and
Cremation
Services
This is a continuing feature designed to answer ques-
tions you may have regarding funeral and crema-
tion services. The questions and answers are the same as
those available through the USWest Direct Yellow Pages
Q&A Section in the front of the book.
Question: What5 meant by "Celebrating Life"?
Answer: "Celebrating lifell means acknowledging
the life of the person who died. It means applaud-
ing their life and rejoicing the fact that they lived.
The person who died had an impact on everyone who
attends the service. They had a special gift that every-
one felt. It might have been strength, or humor, or stub-
bornness. Whatever it was, it was a quality that
touched people's lives.
"Celebrating Lifell means sharing memories of the per-
son, and how they affected your life - the adventures or
quiet moments you shared, the ways they inspired you,
or little things they did to make you laugh. Memories
can be funny, sad, happy, or bittersweet, but they all tell
a story about the person. It is important to share those
memories because it brings meaning to our life, and to
the life of the person who died.
You can "Celebrate Lifell in a memorial or funeral ser-
vice by encouraging people to share their memories of
the person, and the meaning that person had ln their
lives.
QYm:!~!~PY
TIle Bradshaw Quarterly is a regular feature in
Caregivers Quarterly and provides an opportunity
to learn more about our organization. Our goal is
to encourage two-way communication between a
our readers and our staff. .,
1078 Rice Street. Saint Paul, MN. 489-1349
Bradshaw Honors
34 Funeral Service
Professionals
For the past 25 years the Bradshaw Family of
Funeral Homes, Inc. has served our Saint Paul
community from Bradshaw Adam, Carlson,
Devlin, and Listoe-Wold Funeral Homes; our Stillwater
community from Bradshaw Jones Funeral Home; and
our Minneapolis community from Bradshaw McDivitt-
Hauge Funeral Home. Before that, however, these
locations were owned and operated by individuals also
dedicated to serving the public.
On May 20,21 and 22, 1996 we are celebrating our rich
heritage by honoring and dedicating our six funeral
homes to all of the former owners who generously
devoted their careers to serving our metropolitan
communities. Please join us at any or all of our
dedications listed on the back of this page.
There will be a brief dedication ceremony, music
and refreshments.
Accompanying the dedication is the unveiling of our
new company name and logo. The Bradshaw Family of
Funeral Homes, Inc. becomes The Bradshaw Group, Inc.
doing business as Bradshaw Funeral and Cremation
Services, Bradshaw AfterCare Services, Bradshaw PrePlan
and Bradshaw Professional Services.
tBradsha~
Creating Meaningful Events That Celebrate Life SM
..............
Funeral & Cremation Services
Our new logo contains the words Creating Meaningful
Events that Celebrate Life. More than a slogan, this
describes our promise:
To help people create meaningful events that acknowl-
edge and celebrate the life of the person who has died
and bring healing to the living.
To learn more about what this means to those we serve,
see the column on Questions and Answers Concerning
Funeral and Cremation Services on the back of this page.
Our Funeral Home names are also changing to better
represent our place in the community.
The Bradshaw Adam Funeral Home will be known as
Bradshaw Rice at Magnolia.
Bradshaw Carlson Funeral Home will be known as
Bradshaw Payne Avenue.
Bradshaw Devlin Funeral Home will be known as
Bradshaw Humboldt at Wabasha.
Bradshaw Listoe- Wold Funeral Home will be known as
Bradshaw Highland.
Bradshaw Jones Funeral Home will be known as
Bradshaw Stillwater.
Bradshaw McDivitt-Hauge will be known as
Bradshaw Minnehaha.
.
e
W.w ARE OUR KIDS UP TO?
Homework: 88% of our kids spero between 1 and 10
hours per week doing homework.
Music Involvement: Half of our kids spend between I
and 10 hours per week practicing voice or musical
instruments.
Clubs/organizations: 49% of our kids spend between I
and 10 hours each week active in clubs and organiza-
tions outside of school.
Sports: Half of our kids spend more than I hour per
week playing on a school sports tcanl.
Church: Just over half of our kids spend between I and
10 hours per week involved in church related activities.
Reading for pleasure: 12% of our kids spend more
than 6 hours per week reading for pleasure.
Watching TV or vidoos: 40% spend more than 6 hours
per week watching 1V or videos.
Volunteering: 30% of our kids spend between I and to
hours per week doing volunteer work or service.
Chores at homeJbabysitting for family: 79% of our
kids spend between I and 10 hours per week doing
chores at home or babysitting for family members.
Work for pay: 38% of our kids spend more than 6
hours per week working for pay, including babysilling
li>r others. At 12th gnlue, more than half of our kids
spend more than II hours per week working for pay.
Hanging out: 49% of our kids spend more than 6
hours per week hanging out.
Skipping School: One out of ten 6th grooers, two out
of ten 9th graders and three out of ten seniots answered
that they have skipped or cut lull days of school during
the past 30 days.
Property destruction: During the last 12 months. one
out of tive boys and almost one out of ten girls has dmn-
aged or destroyed property at school or somewhere else
at least once or twice.
CHOICES OUR KIDS ARE MAKING:
Cigarette Use: While over 90% of our 6th grade youth
have never tried cigarelles. at 121.h gnlue, 35% are
smoking weekly.
Drinking: While over 9()Ok of our 61h gmdc youth
have never tried alcohol. that number drops to 48% at
9th grade and 23% at 12th grade. 31 % of 12th gmue
boys and 19% of 12th grade girls report using alcohol
weekly.
Marijuana Use: While 99.5% of 6th graders have
never tried marijuana, that number drops to 70.5% at
9th grJLlc and to 52% at 12tJI grade. 23% of 12th grade
boys and 15% of 12th grade girls report using marijuana
weekly.
Reasons for substance IlOIl-use: 45% of the students
surveyed responded that tJley have no desire to use alco-
hol or other (hugs. 34% chcx>se not to use because their
parents would object. 'Illis reason is over 50% at the 6th
grade level. 29% don't use drugs or alcohol because it is
illegal. 36% don't use because it could affect their per-
fonnance in school, sports, or other activities. 34%
choose not to use because Ihey believe alcohol and
drugst~ dangerous.
e
Shoplifting: One out oftive boys (20%) has taken
something from a store without paying for it The figure
is 12% for girls.
I THE 1995 SnUWAlER MN SIuoeNT 9.WEY REStlP.; ARE BASED ON SURVEY RESPONSES FROM 636 6TH GRADERS, 5499IH GRADERS AND 468 12m ~ I
THE ISSUES YOlmf FACE TODAY INClUDE:
Suicide: One in live of all sludents surveyed said that
during the last 30 days they have had thoughts about
killing themselves bul wouldn't do it. One in twenty
reported that Illey would like to killthemselvcs, with the
numbers reaching almost one in ten at the 9th grade ,
level. One in ten 9th gmders reported trying to kill them-
selves during the last year.
Violence: lout of 10 children has been hit so hard by
an adult in their household, that marks were left or they
were afraid of that person.
Scxmll Abuse: 3% of tJle youth (50 children) respond-
ed thatllll older or :;lmnger liullily member had touched
them sexually or made the youlh louch tJlClIl.
Gangs: One in five of the students who responded say
they are not in a gang, but have friends who are in . <
gangs, while only two in one hundred say they spend
some or a lot of time in a gang.
WHAT DO OUR KIDS WORfN ABOU1?
Money: Slightly less than one out of ten of our kids
wony about their family not having enough money for
food and a place to live. '
Weight: 50% of the girls, but only 16% of boys worry
about their weight Seven out of ten 9th and 12 grade
girls say tJley exercised during the last 30 days to lose
weight or to keep from gaining weight; 8% of the same
girls said tJley vomited, took laxatives or diet pills to
lose weight.
Death: Almost one in five students wornes about
hislher own dentJl, while 28% WOl1)' about the deaths of
liiends or family members.
Parent drinking: One youth out of twenty worries
about hislher parents' drinking.
Pregnancy: While only ~% of 9th and 12th grade boys
worry about pregnancy, 19% of the girls in the same'
grades wony about this issue.
WHM MAKES KJDS HAPPY?
Kids were given 22 sources of happiness and mark all
that apply. The following 12 had an avemge rating of
more than 50%:
Sexual Behavior: 52% of 12tJl gmde boys and 51 % of
12th grade girls have had sexual intercourse.
Friends .86%
Doing weD in School · 76%
Doing things Outdoors · 73%.
Listening to Music · 70%
Family · 63%
Doing a Good Job at Something · 69%
Making Money · 69%
Buying Thing> I Like · 69%
Rl'Cciving I>mise or Compliments · 68%
Going Co l>al1ics · 66%
Playing Sports · 63%
Dating · 61 % (9th & 12th gmde only.)
"
^, "r~$,;^
" "t;~-tr?
e
y OUJH PERCEPIlONS OF A CARING
, ENVIRONMENT:
In general more lhan 90% of our kids feel that parents!
. family care about them and their feelings-however, the
numbers dip a little bit (just below 90%) at the 9th grade
level.
72% of tlte YOUtll surveyed describe tlte rules their par-
ents set for litem as fair and reasonable.
While 50% of male 6111 graders say they can talk to their
fathers about problems tltey are facing most of the time,
that number decreases to 26% by 9th grade and 25% by
12th grade. 27% of 6111 grade girl.. can talk to tlteir
fathers most of the time while 17% of 9th grade girls
and 24% of 12111 grade girls feel this yJay.
68% of female 6111 graders can talk to their motllCrs
about their problems most of tile time, while 39% of 9111
gr.Kk !!ir ", ~111l148% of 12th grade girls say lIlis is tile
CCI:,(,'. .',I}',:;, of61h grade boys can talk to their mothers
about their problems most of the time. while 39% of 91h
grade boys and 35% of 12111 grade boys say this is Ihe
case.
68% of the YOUtll surveyed l11ink school people care
,. about them some, quite .a bit or"ery illuch.
69% of the youl11 surveyed l11ink church leaders care
about them some, quite a bit or very much.
57% of the youl11 surveyed think police officers care
about tllCm some, quile a bit or very much.
..
How DO OUR KIDS FEEL ABOUT lHEIR OWN
SAFETY?
96% of the students who responded feel safe in tlleir
neighborhoods and 97% of them feci safe at school.
AN INtERES11NG DEMOGRAPHIC:
Seven out of ten of our kids surveyed live wil11 both
their biologicaVadoptive parents.
"
e'
THE
MINNESOTA
STUDENT
SURVEY
Stillwater
Area
Highlights
Tartan Park Map
Company ServIces
. ,
I I N
,I NORTH I
I ST. PAUL I
I I
I I
I I
L____-l
MAPLEWOOD I
-----1 I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I ,
I I
I I
~I fl
~ c
SAINT I
PAUL I
I
Dlnctlonl to Tartan Pa'" ,
1. Proceed ralt trom Mpll. or St. Plul.
palling 3M Center.
2. Proceed approximately 7.1 miles Irom 3M
Center II McKnlghl Roed on 1.9410
Wllhlngton County No. 15 (Mlnnlng
Ave,). pilling 1-4941894 en route.
3. Exit at County Roed 15 (Menning Ave,).
tum Left on MannIng and proceed North
1.4 mil...
4. Tum Left onto Manning Trell. following
Ilgns to Tertan P8rll.
.
e
MN "'" ,.
t:
J .....
f
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I u...
J _ A../lOllI\JCe. " I
-..
UmllH
7.t ...
WOODBURY
=
J
~
~
i
I
5. Continue 8/10 mile to 20th Itreet.
e. Turn Len on 20th streel 4/10 mile 10
enlrance 10 perk.
Nol.:
7. For tholt comIng Irom the North or South
on 1-4941894. proceed Ellt on 1.94 4,8
miles to County Road 15. (Manning Ave,)
(ReIer 10 step 3 Irom Ihere.)
~hank IdOU for sharing our vision of serving
Idoung people and their families
in new and innovative walds.
please help us celebrate the merger
of
South Communities Counseling Service
and
St. Croix Valleld youth Service t'3ureau
as we chart our new course together as
youth Service rJu,eau1 9nc.
,;
3rlday, }VIay 31, 1996
crartan park, Cake Elmo
(See enclosed map)
$15.00 per person
your check is lJour reservation.
11:30 a.m. - Reception
Noon-12:30 p.m. - Luncheon
12:30 -1:00 p.m. - program
Send to youth Service t'3ureau
101 West pine Street
Stillwater. MN 55082
please respond bid Maid 29. 1996
e
tit
Former Landfill Operator and
Hauler Steps Forward
The Beginning
About 25 years
ago, an old, unlined
gravel pit in Hudson
Township started
receiving waste from
businesses, industries,
schools, government,
and thousands of
homes. This landfill is
commonly referred to
as the Junker Landfill.
In 1987 the WDNR
ordered that the Junker
Landfill stop accepting
waste.
State Efforts
Because the Junker
Landfill operator and
owner did not step
forward to address
landfill closure, the '
WDNR took on the task
of permanently closing
the landfill in 1990 by
placing an engineered
clay cap over the waste.
The WDNR also
created a special well
advisory area to control
the drilling of new
wells in the well
e advisory area.
In March, the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) and the Junker Landfill Trust (a
voluntary group of past landfill customers) had reached
an agreement under which the Junker Landfill Trust
would implement the landfill remedy. From 1977 to
1987, Junker Sanitary Landfill, Inc., Junker Sanitation
Services, Inc. (recently purchased by United Waste
Systems, Inc.) and Junker Recycling were the operator
and main hauler at the landfill. The former operator
and hauler stepped forward soon afterwards and of-
fered to implement the cleanup. The State agreed to
enter into a settlement with the former operator and
hauler whereby they will implement the remedy at the
landfill instead ofthe Junker Landfill Trust.
In mid-April, the former operator and hauler took
over the responsibility for the bottled water program
and the operation and maintenance of the landfill-both
of which the Junker Landfill Trust had been doing on a
voluntary basis. .
The investigation and planning by the Junker Land-
fill Trust was completed in record time. Therefore, the
actual remedy is expected to begin many years sooner
than what typically occurs at landfills.
In 1992, the
WDNR installed a
system to extract and
burn subsurface landfill
gas, which is a common
issue at landfills.
Voluntary Efforts
by Past Customers
In 1994 a small
group of past landfill
customers volunteered
to investigate the
environmental issues at
the landfill and plan a
remedy.
The customers
organized themselves as
the Junker Landfill
Trust and in 1994
launched a program to
give free bottled water
to homes around the
landfilL In 1995, the
Trust relieved the
WDNR of the closed
landfill's operation and
maintenance, including
running the gas
extraction and monitor-
ing systems.
At the same time,
these past customers
initiated a Remedial
Investigation to better
define the environmen-
tal issues at the Land-
fill, followed by a
Feasibility Study on
ways to remedy the
landfilL This study
included comprehensive
recommendations about
several remedial
actions, which were
described in the Fact
Sheet sent to the
community in March.
The WDNR
received the Feasibility
Study report in Septem-
ber 1995 and approved
it on March 27, 1996.
At this point, the
fonner operator and
hauler is negotiating an
agreement with the
State to carry out the
cleanup of the landfill.
H
What Happens Next?
The Landfill Remedy
e
Cost Recovery
It is anticipated
that the Wisconsin
DNR and the former
landfill operator and
hauler will soon ask a
court to approve the
agreement for the
operator and hauler to
implement the landfill
remedy and continue
long-term operation
and maintenance.
The Junker
Landfill Trust believes
that residents will
continue to receive
bottled water until the
operator and hauler
install granular
activated carbon (GAC)
filter systems in their
homes as part of the
expected remedy.
The WDNR is
currently preparing a
summary of the remedy
it has chosen for the
landfill. The WDNR
will ask the community
to review its decision
and comment on the
remedy. The WDNR
will probably host a
public meeting within
the next month to
discuss the remedy.
People are encour-
aged to call the WDNR
with any questions (see
below).
This Fact Sheet
is a publication of the
Junker Landfill Group
and is prepared
as needed for the
community and others.
National public
policy directs that the
cost of landfill cleanup
be shared fairly among
the landfill's owners,
operators, haulers,
disposal arrangers, and
customers. Hundreds of
landfill cleanups have
been funded this way
throughout the United
States. In addition,
federal law allows those
who have already paid
for cleanup activities to
pursue reimbursement
to ensure that all parties
involved with a site pay
their fair share.
So far, a small
group of past landfill
customers (the Junker
Landfill Trust) has
voluntarily paid $1.4
million, and the WDNR
has paid about $3
million to respond to
the environmental
conditions at the
landfill. These funds
made it possible to
close and maintain the
landfill, provide bottled
water to residents,
investigate the environ-
mental issues, an~ plan
a comprehensive
remedy.
Therefore, the
Junker Landfill Trust
(which comprises only
3% of all past custom-
ers) filed a lawsuit in
January against the
landfill's main operator
and hauler (including
the hauler's new
owner). The WDNR
recently joined the
Junker Landfill Trust in
this suit.
In addition, the
Junker Landfill Trust
recently filed suit
against over 300 past
landfill customers.
Those court papers
were served on the past
customers in April.
The former operator/
hauler filed suit against
over 600 past custom-
ers, but has not served
the customers with
court papers yet.
The litigation is
proceeding while all
parties wait to see if the
agreement between the
State and the former
operator and hauler is
finalized.
Call or Write the
Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources:
Eau Claire Office:
1300 West Clairemont Avenue
PO Box 4001
Eau Claire, WI 54702
(715) 839-1604
.
Baldwin Office
995 Hillcrest Avenue, Suite 104
Baldwin, WI 54002
(715) 684-2914
"i;4:.
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 3801. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-3801
(612) 430-7600 Facsimile Machine: 612/430-7603
WASHINGTON COUNTY
April 24, 1996
JAMES J, FRANK
SHERIFF
THEODORE p, BROWN
CHIEF DEPUTY
Mayor Jay Kimble
stillwater city Hall
216 North 4th street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor Kimble:
Under Minnesota Rules 6110.1800, a person may make an
application for a permit to place a temporary structure or buoy
upon a body of water. The sheriff of the county may issue such
permits, if in the sheriff's opinion, that structure or buoy
will not constitute an undue hazard or any illegal obstruction
to navigation.
In order to fully consider every application and allow for
participation of local government units in this decision, the
Sheriff's Office would like to amend its application and
application process. Under our new procedure before a water ski
slalom course would be permitted, we require the applicant to
obtain written approval of the city or township in which the
course is to be located (see enclosed application form).
Ideally, the city or township would issue such written approval
only after they have complied with the open meeting law and had
this matter heard in a public proceeding so that interested
parties could comment and provide citizen input into the
decision making process. To that end, we ask that you consider
implementing such a procedure in your jurisdiction, if you have
a body of water, and if application for a water ski slalom
course is made.
<
--
The decision as to whether or not to issue a permit by law
ultimately rests with the Sheriff's Office. However, we wish to
make a decision to issue, or deny, a permit based upon as much
appropriate information as possible. We assure you that strong
consideration will be given to the input from local government
units, particularly those who have allowed for public input into
the decision. We believe that local government should have a
strong say in how the surface of the waters within its
jurisdiction is used for these purposes.
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
~"'".,
-'~" '"
; ~
. .
....".. ..I
.........
'"I ~;, ~
.... '"
Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation in this ~
matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
s :e(7))
im i~nk
heriff
Irs
Encl
,
.1
.. -,
I- , ,.
WASHlNGTON COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 3801. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-3801
(612) 430-7600 Facsimile Machine: 612/430-7603
JAMES J. FRANK
SHERIFF
THEODORE P. BROWN
CHIEF DEPUTY
Permit to Place a Raft, Buoy or Other Structure on or in the
Waters of This County Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 6110.1800
WATER SURFACE USE APPLICATION
*************************************
_-~App1icant information:
Name:
Address:
Home Phone:
Work Phone:
Body of Water where structure will be located:
Type of Structure:
Installation of Structure from
to
Permit requirements:
1. Diagram of water surface showing placement of structure,
include the depth of the water at the location of the
structure.
2. Permit must be issued before structure is placed on or in
the water.
3. Structure must be placed between the permit holder's
property lines as they extend into the lake.
4. Structure must be within 100 feet of shore.
5. Structure must display proper reflective material as
described in Minnesota State Rule 6110.1800.
6. Permit number must be displayed on the structure using
numbers that are at lest two inches high and a contrasting
color to the area where they are attached.
7.
Water Ski Slalom Course Applications must be approved by a
representati ve of the City or TI----..t-rL.-.Ll'h~rA the course
will be located. -.. -
Office of the Sheriff
Gary J. Swanson
Sergeant
Patrol Division
S.W.A.T. Team
City/Township Representative:
Date:
I-
Signature of Applicant:
Date:
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIR
Washington County
Law Enforcement Center
14:00 61st St. N., P.O. Box 3801
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-3801
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 3801. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-3801
(612) 430-7600 Facsimile Machine: 612/430-7603
WASHINGTON COUNTY
JAMES J. FRANK
SHERIFF
April 24, 1996
THEODORE p, BROWN
CHIEF DEPUTY
Mayor Jay Kimble
Stillwater city Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor Kimble:
Under Minnesota Rules 6110.1800, a person may make an
application for a permit to place a temporary structure or buoy
upon a body of water. The sheriff of the county may issue such
permits, if in the sheriff's opinion, that structure or buoy
will not constitute an undue hazard or any illegal obstruction
to navigation.
In order to fully consider every application and allow for
participation of local government units in this decision, the
Sheriff's Office would like to amend its application and
application process. Under our new procedure before a water ski
slalom course would be permitted, we require the applicant to
obtain written approval of the city or township in which the
course is to be located (see enclosed application form).
Ideally, the city or township would issue such written approval
only after they have complied with the open meeting law and had
this matter heard in a public proceeding so that interested
parties could comment and provide citizen input into the
decision making process. To that end, we ask that you consider
implementing such a procedure in your jurisdiction, if you have
a body of water, and if application for a water ski slalom,
course is made.
\.
'e
The decision as to whether or not to issue a permit by law
ultimately rests with the Sheriff's Office. However, we wish to
make a decision to issue, or deny, a permit based upon as much
appropriate information as possible. We assure you that strong
consideration will be given to the input from local government
units, particularly those who have allowed for public input into
the decision. We believe that local government should have a
strong say in how the surface of the waters within its
jurisdiction is used for these purposes.
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
~,_c"'"
rff~~' ~~~
\. f
"... .."
. "'.......
Thank you in advance for your courtesy and cooperation in this
matter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
s :e(7:l
im i~nk
heriff
Irs
Encl
"
'./
I ' ..
.#
e
~
.
~
..
-
. .,
WASHlNGTON COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF
LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 3801. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-3801
(612) 430-7600 Facsimile Machine: 612/430-7603
WATER SURFACE USE APPLICATION
*************************************
JAMES J. FRANK
SHERIFF
THEODORE P. BROWN
CHIEF DEPUTY
Permit to Place a Raft, Buoy or Other Structure on or in the
Waters of This County Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 6110.1800
_-~Applicant information:
Name:
Address:
Home Phone:
Work Phone:
Body of Water where structure will be located:
Type of Structure:
Installation of Structure from
to
Permit requirements:
1. Diagram of water surface showing placement of structure,
include the depth of the water at the location of the
structure.
2. Permit must be issued before structure is placed on or in
the water.
3. Structure must be placed between the permit holder's
property lines as they extend into the lake.
4. Structure must be within 100 feet of shore.
5. Structure must display proper reflective' material as
described in Minnesota State Rule 6110.1800.
6. Permit number must be displayed on the structure using
numbers that are at lest two inches high and a contrasting
color to the area where they are attached.
7.
Water Ski Slalom Course Applications must be approved by a
representative of the City or T,---~~~wh~rR the course
will be located. -- -
Office of the Sheriff
Gary J. Swanson
Sergeant
Patrol Division
S.W.A.T. Team
City/Township Representative:
Date:
.
Signature of Applicant:
Date:
Printed on Recycled Paper
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIA
Washington County
Law Enforcement Center
14:0<' 61st St. N., P.O. Box 3801
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-3801
~~l
Police-Fire-Medical
EMERGENCY
9-1-1
430-7881 439-9381
Fax 612-430-7878