HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-16 CC Packet
,.
\
REVISED AGENDA **
CITY OF STILLWATER t
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 95-)9
May 16, 1995
SPECIAL MEETING
REGULAR MEETING
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Workshop: Public Facilities Projects
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
2. Police Chief
3. Public Works Director
4. Community Dev. Director
5. Parks & Recreation
6. City Engineer
7. Consulting Engineer
8. City Clerk
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
. ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 25, 1995, Special Meeting
I.
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Proclamation: Honoring Older Americans and Senior Citizens
2. Commending James Stevensen, Retiring Firefighter (Resolution 95-116)
3. Commending Larry Buberl, Retiring Police Officer (Resolution 95-117)
4, Bradley Allen, Police Officer - Oath
5. Anthony Spencer, Parking Enforcement Officer - Oath
6. Historic Preservation Awards - Jeff Johnson
a. Restoration and Signage: J.P. Laskin, 308 East Chestnut
b. Renovation: Mike McGuire, Commander Elevator
c. New Construction: David Paradeau, Minnesota Zephyr
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
9. Fire Chief
10. Building Official
11. City Attorney
12. City Coordinator
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the
meeting agenda, The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff
regarding investigation of the concerns expressed,
CONSENT AGENDA *
1. Resolution 95-115: Directing Payment of Bills
2, Contractors Licenses
3. Approving request for refund of planning permit application fee - Deanne and Jon Stratte
4. Submit claim against the City to insurance carrier
5. Approving exemption from lawful gambling license - Stillwater Wrestling Booster Club
City Council Agenda No. 95-~ ('i'
May 16, 1995
Page 2
'(Consent Agenda continued)
6. Request to host ball tournament at Lily Lake ballfields
7. Resolution 95-118: Approval of Memorandum of Continuance for Goodwill Drop Off Center
8. Resolution 95-119: Approving Change Order No.1, L.I. 300, Mulberry Street Reconstruction
9. Resolution: Approving employment of City Planner
i ,..,~c)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. V /95-36. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a variance to rear
yard setback requirements for construction of 32 x 32 foot carriage house with 2-foot setback, 25
feet required, at 602 North Main in the RB Duplex Residential District, Washington County
Historical Society, Applicant.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on May 10, 1995, and notices
mailed to affected property owners.
--
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Final Plat approval for 20-10t townhouse subdivision located east of CR 5 at Croixwood
Boulevard in the RB Duplex Residential District, John Roettger, Applicant. Case No.
SUB/PUD/94-63. R-es8httien J[ MrJ: Approving Final Plat
2. Request to construct two 2-unit townhouse structures in advance of public improvements at
Autumn Wood project (Case SUB/PUD/94-63) John Roettger, applicant.
3. Resolution 95-121: Receiving Report, Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans, L.I. 309, .
Wildwood Pines 5th Addition.
4. Comments: Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for new St. Croix River crossing
NEW BUSINESS
1. Request for septic, driveway, and building permit, North First Street
2. Resolution 95-122: Accepting Bid, L.I. 312, 1995 Street Projects
3. Approving Motion Picture Production Permit
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICA TIONS/REOUESTS
1. Metropolitan Council: Request for recommendations for appointments to Metropolitan Parks and
Open Space Commission.
COUNCIL REOUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
.
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which
event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
* * Items in italics are additions to the agenda
.
.
Ie
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Clerk
DATE:
May 16, 1995
SUBJECT:
Additions/Changes to Council Packet and Agenda
ADDITIONS/CHANGES TO AGENDA
Consent Agenda:
Delete Item No.7: Fence Permit - Deblon
New Business:
Item No.3: Application for Movie Production Permit
ADDITIONS TO COUNCIL PACKET
1.
Revised Agenda
2. Staff Reports
Fire Chief: Permit fees for tank removal
Community Development Director: Memo - City Planner
3.
Consent Agenda
Item No.1:
Item No.2:
List of Bills
Contractors Licenses (addition of A-I Paint Works)
4.
New Business:
Item No.2:
Item No: 3:
Memo and Resolution: Award Bid, L.I. 312
Application for Movie Production Permit
5.
FYI:
FYI:
FYI:
Invitation to Simonet Furniture and Carpet groundbreaking ceremony
Minutes - Stillwater Town Board, 5/11/95
LMC Cities Bulletin
\Council\dad
~
--
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
SUBJECT:
City Hall Remodeling Expansion Issue
DATE:
May 12, 1995
Accompanying this memo is some information related to the City Hall remodeling /expansion
project. The information should provide you with a good background on the cost, proposed design,
and other issues related to the project. Pete Smith (BWBR), Dick Olsen (GWO) and I will be
prepared to provide the Council with additional information as necessary.
In regards to the City Hall project I think it is important for the Council to keep in mind that the idea
(or need/) of remodeling the City Hall facilities began in earnest in 1990. At that time I presented
the Council with a proposal to do a staffing and facility study to determine what could be done to
improve the facilities as well as the spacial working relationships of the various departments. The
intended result of this study was to develop space needs requirements based on existing conditions
and on projected growth. The Council did not go forward with this study. However, the Council did
conduct an efficiency study in 1993, This study did identify some ways in which the staff could
process work and/or provide services more efficiently but more importantly the study identified
problems associated with the lack of space at City Hall. Schematics showing the space requirements
of each department were developed and the schematics were the basis for the work and proposal that
was developed by BWBR. The plan developed by BWBR was also the basis for the cost analysis
provided by GWO.
Basically the plan developed by BWBR provides for the remodeling and expansion of the present
City Hall at a cost of about $2.0 million dollars. The expansion would involve the construction of
a third floor above the existing building (but not above the Council Chamber area). The plans also
call for additional building construction on the East side of the building if necessary in the future.
Although the plans appear to be well laid out and address the needs of each department they are not
a final product and will have to be "fine tuned" to ensure that each departments needs are addressed
(as near as practical anyway).
'.
During the past workshops, meetings, and hearings on the building issue the following questions and
.
concerns were raised:
1) Will the building expansion take care of the City's needs for a reasonable period of time? __
2) The facilities lack adequate parking areas.
3) Are their other options available such as :
a) Sale of existing building and construction of a new City hall?
b) Lease of other buildings/space for certain departments such as Police?
c) Construction of a new building for Police (and Fire)?
4) How will the project be financed?
In regards to the first question it is always difficult to project how long a facilities will accommodate
future growth. I think the Council that was in place in the 60's did a pretty good job when they
decided to construct a new City Hall in 1965. I am sure that they struggled with the same concerns.
And I am sure that they would not be surprised to see the present day discussion about expanding
and remodeling the present building. This building has accommodated the growth of Stillwater
pretty well over the past thirty years. During that time the City's boundaries just about doubled in
land area and the population grew from 9,000 to the present population of 15,500.
According to the land use scenarios developed with the updated Comp Plan and even considering
the maximum growth scenario (i.e., out to hwy. 36, hwy. 15, and hwy. 96) a growth of only 5000
in population would take place. Their would also appear to be an additional 8-10 miles of street and
other related infrastructure built as well. All of this would impact on City resources and would
require additional personnel and perhaps some additional facilities. However, I do not think that a
significant impact would be made on office personnel (i.e., personnel housed at City Hall). I would
predict that additional personnel would be needed as follows:
1) One Administrative Asst. (Personnel Director).
2) Asst. Finance Director'( or Accountant).
3) Engineering staff (depends on whether the City develops a full service Engineering Dept.)
4) One clerical support person.
(I should point out that at this time an additional person is already needed in Admin/Finance).
Other personnel will also be needed in the Police and Public Work's departments. However, the
impact on the City Hall facilities will not be significant because these personnel will not be housed
at City Hall or will only require minor amounts of space. Further, the plans developed by BWBR
include a plan for additional expansion of City Hall if necessary. To be frank about the building and
the projected growth and need for further expansion I would point out that even if the facilities
reached maximum capacity in say 10 to 15 years (which is highly unlikely) it is just as likely that
5 to 10 additional years would pass before any thing was done to expand the facilities. For example,
in my opinion this building reached full capacity in 1980 when the employee's lunchroom was
converted to office use. Further, the last available office space was occupied when Steve Russell was
hired in 1986 (and in 1995 even the Mayor's office was converted to staff office space). The only
meeting rooms in this building are the Council Chambers and the Fire Department training room.
Therefore, I firmly believe that regardless of which growth scenario you use the proposed expansion
would be adequate for a minimum of 25 years and that is about as far into the future as one can
reasonably project.
I would also like to point out that it is quite possible that the future will see a new Public Safety
-.,
.
.
e
Building that for sure would house the Fire Department and one that would more than likely house
the Police Department as well. If this were to take place then the need to further expand City Hall
would be unnecessary. For example, all of the space now occupied by the Police and Fire
Departments would then be available for support services. Just the relocation of the Fire Department
by itself would create the required space (and parking).
Another possibility is the construction of a new Public Works facility which could also house the
Engineering Department. Although this would not create a large amount of space at City hall it
would have some impact on space and on parking
In regards to the parking situation the present site does have some limitations which would be
compounded if the Trinity parking lot was not available for evening parking. The City has had some
meetings that were "well" attended in the past. However, the problems have been more related to
Council Chamber space limitations rather than parking because of the availability of the Trinity
parking lot. I think the problem will not increase significantly for the next 5-10 years and it is
feasible that a parking ramp could be built in the northwest comer of the site (where the current
parking lot is now). And as was pointed out above, the parking situation would be alleviated in the
future if the Fire Department was relocated. Further, the present parking lot is not being utilized at
its maximum capacity. The striping of a middle parking section would create an additional 6-7
parking spaces now. This has not been done yet because the present parking situation is ok (tight
but ok/) and the striping of the middle area will create a less convenient "in and out" situation.
In regards to one of the options which would be to sell the present City Hall, City Garage, and Parks
facilities and build a new complex ( or complexes) at another location I would suggest that the cost
to do so would be substantial and unnecessary. The City has obtained appraisals of the buildings in
question which indicate that the sites have a value of $565,000, $120,000, and $77,000 respectively
for a total value of $772,000. According to Dick Olsen the cost of a new complex to house
Administrative, Police and Fire departments, not including the cost of the land, would be about
$3,500,000. The cost of a new Public Works facility would be about $550,000. Assuming the city
were to sell the present facilities at the appraised values and purchase other property at a price of
between $400,000-$500,000 the net cost would be about $3.7-$3.8 million.
Although the City does have parcels available in the Industrial Park area the land was intended for
park and recreational facilities. Additional land would have to be purchased if the City were to carry
out it's original intentions. On the other hand if the City were to sell the Industrial Park property to
a private party and not replace the park/recreational property the City could realize about $1,000,000
for the property and the net cost would then be $2.7-$2.8 million.
e
It has also been suggested that the City could utilize the Industrial Park armory site. However, this
site was deeded to the State of Minnesota by the City for the construction of a new armory and I
don't know what the State's position on this matter would be. Especially since they have been
lobbying Congress very aggressively for funds to build a new armory in Stillwater. Further,
according to the data the City reviewed some time ago, an armory has a very favorable economic
impact on the community. This is reason the City purchased the Industrial Park property in the first
place. If the State does not build the armory and deeds the property back to the City then the net cost
would be about $2.7-$2.8 million. The drawb,acks to doing this would be the loss of the economic
impact of the armory and having a very poor location for the Fire department.
Another suggested option involved the possibility of leasing space -primarily in the downtown
area~ to house a department (police and Administrative offices were mentioned). The Old Prison,
the Desch building, the former Cub office (Reed's Drug Store) and the Northwestern Telephone
building have been mentioned. The first two buildings are not available ( anymore) and the third
(which is still under lease by Cub) has a lease period of2~3 years remaining. The owners do not
appear to be interested in reviewing the lease at this time. Further this site is very unfavorable
compared to the present City Hall and would lead to decentralization and fragmentation of city
services. The fourth site (NW building) does have some possibilities. The Police Chief and I have
visited the site and it appears that it could adequately house the Police Department. The NW officials
have not yet provided us with a lease price but have indicated that if leased the site could be
available for at least a 5-10 year period. The cost to remodel/equip this building is estimated to be
about $100,000~$150,000. If this were the only option available it could help relieve some of the
space pressure at City Hall. However, it would still be necessary to remodel City Hall to meet ADA
requirements as well as to (hopefully) provide a lunchroom for staff. If! understand the numbers that
were discussed in past meetings it would appear that this latter effort could cost between $500,000-
$1,000,000 (depending upon whether sprinkling and an elevator was necessary). The drawbacks
to this scenario are the length of the lease and the availability of the property for the long term and
the additional cost of leasing the facilities.
In regards to the financing of the proposed City Hall project I would suggest that the City Council
consider using the funds that became available from the Market Place development. This amounts
to about $1,500,000 and could be used in one of two ways. First the City could use the funds to
reduce the amount of bonds needed to finance the project . It would appear that bonds would be
needed in the amount of $2-2.5 million if the present facilities were remodeled/expanded and that
the reduced bond issue amount would therefore be about $500,000-$1,000,000. The bonds would
then be fmanced by tax levies. Or the City could issue bonds for the total amount needed and use the
funds mentioned above to write down all or a portion of the tax levies to the extent available. This
would be an important consideration if the Legislature approves the pending "tax freeze" bill.
I have tried to cover most of the questions and concerns that have previously been raised on this
issue. I probably have not covered everything. However, Pete Smith, Dick Olsen and I will be
prepared to further discuss this with you Tuesday night. Hopefully the Council can obtain all of the
information it needs as a result of this meeting and go forward with some project that will eliminate
the problems we now have with the present facilities.
Recommendation:
1) Approve proposed City Hall remodeling/expansion project as developed by BWBR;
2) Approve contract between City of Stillwater and BWBR for architectural services to
Prepare plans and specifications for project; and
3) Approve contract between City of Stillwater and GWO for construction management
servIces.
-1/pl{
M
~
e
ei
~
~,
=
=e
is
!
;
;1
;;
==
;I
~
I
:;
;;
=
::I
:=
=
I
;;
-
!if
:;
:;
:I
I
;
.
.
::;
:;e
a
a
PRELIMINARY SPACE ALLOCATION PROGRAM
The following is a preliminary space all~ation program. It identifies existing and proposed
square footages 'for each department with the City Hall/Police building as well as the Fire
Department building. The square footages proposed are based upon infonnation taken from the
Tennessen Report, the City Comprehensive Plan, and detailed discussions with City Departments
and the City Coordinator. It should be noted that a more detailed program analysis of space
requirements would be necessary before undertaking a building project
SUMMARY
SPACE ALLOCATION PROGRAM
BJlildin~lDepartment
CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING
Existin~ Proposed Net S.F. Growth (Net)
Administration
Police
Planning
Building Inspections
Public Works
Misc./Support
3,565
2,970
304
350
944
5,610
13,743 NSFl
3,774
3,785
660
488
844
.1.M5.
17,196 NSF2
.-l...li Dept. Gross Up Factor
3,970 DGSF3
-1..2 Bldg. Gross Up
4,765 Bldg. Growth
16,200 Ext. Bldg. GSF
FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING
Fire
7,300 NSF
7,300 NSF
209
815
356
138
(100)
~
3,453 NSF
o NSF
--.l..l.5. Dept. Gross Up Factor
o Dept. Gross SF
1. Net square footage.
2. Proposed net square footage indicates net growth on a department by department basis.
3. Department gross square footages, includes a 15% department gross up factor for circulation.
8,065 Ext. Bldg. GSF
15
,
Depnrtment Existin~ Proposed NSF Remnrks
Administration -
City Coordinator 200 200
Accounting 335 256
Finance Director 220 200
Assistant Finance Director 144
Personnel Director 144
CopierlFax/Microfiche 120
Mayor's Office 180 180
Computer Room/Supplies 170 170 *Receptionist 100
Vault 200 200 Secretary (2) 200
Administrative Support 600 *500 - City Clerk 200
Council Chambers/Storage JMQ ...l.6.QQ
3,565 NSF 3,774 NSF
-L.l5. Dept. Gross Up Factor
4,340 DGSF
Planning
City Planning Office 240 320 - Separated workstations
for 2 plus computer
workstation
Layout Room/Map Storage 240
Secretary /Reception --24 100 - Currently in Admin. Support area
304 NSF Qoo NSF
ill Dept Gross Up Factor
759 DGSF
Building Inspections
Building Inspector 250 200
Assistant 144
Layout Space 144
Records Storage J.QQ 00ll - Basement Area
350 NSF 488 NSF
ill Dept Gross Up Factor
561 DGSF
Public Works
City Engineer 200 200
Drafting room 580 580
Storage 100 (200) Basement
Secretary --24 ~
944 NSF 844 NSF
-L.l5. Dept Gross Up Factor
970 DGSF
J
e
'~
"
'I
~
16
Department Existin~ Proposed NSF Remarks
e Police
Chief of Police 250 250
Lobby 150 150
Dispatch 300 300
Squad Room 340 540 - SquadlCSOfPatrol
Police Sergeant 200 200
Investigator 200 120
Investigator 250 240
Meter Storage 230
Storage (1st Roor) 100 100
Secure Storage 100 100
2 Car Garage/S torage 650 650 - *Increase garage by 2
additional stalls (if
possible)
Property Intake 200 200
Investigator 150
Captain's Office 200
Interview Rooms (2) 200
Miscellaneous Storage (230) - Basement Area
I Bike Storage (200) - Basement Area
Animal Control 40
I Waiting/Lobby Area 115
Men's Locker Room (25) (575) - Lockers-Basement
I Area (patrol in Exg
(Eng. Offices)
I Women's Locker Room (5) (200) - Lockers - Basement
Area
I Workout/Exercise (200) - Two Universal
Machines- Basement
I Training/Case Room 230
Pistol Rangel Ammo Storage (900) (900) - Existing Basement Area
I (to remain)
Property Storage (700) (700) - Existing Basement Area
I (to remain)
Storage (Basement) ilQID -
~ 2,970 NSF 3.785 NSF
-1J.5. Dept. Gross Up Factor
I 4,352 DGSF (*excluding existing functions in
basement)
:I Miscellaneous/Support
,
I Toilets 1st Floor 220 220
Toilets 2nd Floor 220 220
:I Toilets 3rd Floor 220
:I LobbylFoyer 280 300
::a Waiting 240 240
:I Conference Rooms 2nd Floor 250
tie Conference Rooms 3rd Floor 250
m 17
:I
J
~
~
,ill
~
"'
~
~
~
~
:1
,
":j
1
.i
:-'!
j
~
14l
~
FI'
...
"
J
"
..,
1
.
.::J
.~
...
d
.:-c;
>'i
,01
;'Ii
;;
I
1 I
Department
Proposed NSF
Remarks
Existine-
Miscellaneous Support (continued) e
Smoker's Room 120
Lunch Room 400
Mechanical 360 360
Mechanical-Boiler 340 340
Mechanical :r:xpansion 200
Unassigned Storage 2,350
Basement Storage
Police - Mise, Bikes,
Lockers, Workout 1,405
-Pistol Range, 900 900
Secure Storage 700 700
Planning 200
Building Inspections 200
Administration/Finance 200
Public Works 200
Fire 120
ElevatorlLobby -6.QQ
5,610 NSF 7,645 NSF
-L1.l DepL Gross Up Factor
8,791 DGSF
Fire
PersonnelSupportAIea 2,300 2,300
Assistant Fire Chief
Fire Inspector
Misc. Storage
Dayroom Expansion
Vehicle Garage/Support -2.QQQ -5..QQQ
7,300 NSF 7,300 NSF
--1..Li DepL Gross Up Factor
8,395 DGSF
e
18
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
e
Following is the preliminary pricing for the concept. This pricing is conceptual in nature and is
developed on a cost per square foot basis by George W. Olsen Construction. In addition to the
costs identified by GWO, a 10% construction/design contingency has been added. This includes a
7% design and 3% construction contingency. Due to the conceptual nature of the information
developed thus far, it is necessary to carry a contingency such as this to protect the City from
potential costs which are unknown at this time. The conceptual construction cost is increased an
additional 20% for project expenses. Within this 20% is approximately 10% for architectural and
engineering fees, 2% for miscellaneous reimbursable expenses, and 8% for Owner expenses
including, but not limited to, minor furnishings, surveys, soil borings, plants, signage, asbestos
removal, etc, Actual costs may vary from these conceptual figures depending on how the project
is developed. More detailed verification and actual costs of this scheme by George W. Olsen
Construction should be obtained following each design phase to maintain the overall project
budget.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
Ie
I
I
26
~ 111111111 111111 11111111111111I1111111.11111111.llllii.IIIIII.1111
~
~J:J
0:1
~ II
May 3, 1994
STILLWATER CITY HALL
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
A, BASE BID
1. Existing Building
ESTIMATE
1.2 Remodeled area 5228 sf @ 38.16 =$ 199,508
(New construction: Basement-
1st & 2nd floor)
2. New Addition
"!inI".1 '
2.1 New entry, stairwall & elevator 2280 sf @ 164.76 =$ 375,671
2.2 Third floor
3800 sf @ 94.12 =$ 357,658
Subtotal:
3. Misc. Cost
3.1 10% contingency (5% design, 5% construction)
Total Construction Costs:
$ 932,837
$
93,283
$1,026 120
3.2 20% project costs (fees, equipment, furnishings) $ 205,224
Subtotal Project Cost:
4. City Hall Up~rades (see next ~a~
Add Items To Be Selected:
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS:
$1,231,344
~ T.B.D.
$ T.B.D.
e
II
Page -2-
~CITY HALL UPGRADES
ESTIMATE
#1 Sheetrock existing block walls. Add vinyl
wall covering 1st & 2nd floor. Basement
to be painted block walls.
ADD + $ 55,124
#2 Install.new ceilings on 1st & 2nd floor.
ADD
+ $ 25,573
#3 New floor finish on 1st & 2nd floor.
Basement (new areas) and 3rd floor
included in previous estimates.
ADD + $ 12,447
#4 Replace existing wood windows with
Andersen windows.
ADD + $ 10,094
#5 Lower council platform. ADD + $ 8,779
#6 Hip roof in lieu of flat roof. ADD + $ 51,370
#7 Mechanical & electrical upgrade per
Dunham Report of 3/25/94. ADD + $251,578
#8 Corridor doors upgrade, (8 doors) + $ 4,800
#9 Council Roof replacement ADD + $ 24,357
TOTAL: $444,122
I
I
Ie
I
I
SELECTED
e
.~
uo
Page -3-
~SUMMARY
1. Remodel City Hall vs new City Hall costs
Existing New
'Ci ty Hall City Hall
1.1 Construction Costs
A. Base Bid $ 932,837
B. All City Hall Upgrades 1-.-444.122
Total Existing City Hall $1,376,959
vs
C. New City Hall 22280 sf @ 100 $2,228,000
1.2 10% construction contingency $ 137,696 $ 222,800
1.3 20% project costs ~ 275.392 ~ 490.160
Total Project Costs: $1,790,049 $2,904,960
Project Square Feet Costs: $ 80.34 $ 130.38
1.4 Land Costs (3 acres @ 2.50/sf Existing $ 326,250
1.5 Survey testing, etc. costs None $ 30,000
Required
1.6 Grand Total Costs: $1,790,049 $3,261,210
Grand Square Foot Costs: $ 80.34 $ 146.37
2. Existing site will allow future additions
2.1 East addition 1650 sf x 3 floors 4950 sf
2.2 West addition (north of Fire Hall) (approx.) 7500 sf +
3. Anticipate the following
3.1 1995 + 10%
3.2 1996 + 5%
3.3 1997 + 5%
3.4 1998 + 5%
construction inflation rate each year:
e
. . -.., .- . - - c
-.." .., -'
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUESTED PROVIlED
PISTOl RANGE 800 800
PROPDlTY STORAG:< 700 700
IolEH8 ~OCKEIlS 575 500
WQMENS ~OCKERS 200 200 :'..;1
WORKOUT ROOW 200 200
LISCE\.~ANEOUS STORAGE/ 430 37$
8lCYCl..E STORAGE
...-
TOTAL 3,005 2.875
..
DFFERENCE 1-1301
CITY DEPARTMENTS REOleTED PllOvtlED
loISCa..L.J.lEOUS S TOllAGE aoo 200
DFFERENCE (-6001
~
..
,. City of Stillwater
.~~:~~ City Hall Feasibility study
~~ ,~~,
.:<'1~ ,.. ~om(;"
.~~
= :...-: - c ," -::; = 4'
':""
'."
~:
'i;
',.
'.'"
POLICE
CHIEF OF POUCE
lOBBY
OlSPA TCH
SooAO ROOM
POlICE S/JlGENT
INVESTIGA -;OR
INVESTIGA TOR
INVESTIGA TOR
2 C/Jl G}.R}.GE/STORAGE
PROPERTY !NT .liKE
POlICE CJ.PT AIN
(2) INTERVcW ROOMS
ANMAl COIITROl
WAmNG
TRAINING/CASC
SECURE STORAGE
STORAGE
PAOVNO
220
150
300
560
200
160
230
200
650
100
200
200
100
120
300
120
60
P:E QUESTED
250
150
300
5(0
200
120
240
150
e50
250
200
200
40
115
230
100
100
TOTAL
DIFFERENCE
3,890
(+551
3.836
FLOOR PLANS
ADDITION & RENOVATION
!I .... .
~.OR.t
~au )
~
I,: 1~::1
/, I
"'...; - } .
-, VEST1IlLLE ' lOll8Y
~/-,~..
!l' . HTBlV
....
~'::'., ~~',~.~ r \
".,oJ,""'-
;Rt~t: ---....1
1lliHia1
;-:~~,t EXPAHSION 1
!J!tE'.~:;. J pormw. 1
'i*~f l ... 1
-,' ~-'''., ) 1
J 1
; .~:;;. . I
.. I
,'-- _./
B
STOR.
CIlClU noli .
"
l~.
_. ",.,....':::
, \
~ - - -""
t I
P<Y.a II ~;= II
GARAGE ~ 'I ...
. . - I
". '. . ':.~I, I
,.; ,... .. ':J'- _ _ ../
b
~)
:II I:
I'
-c:~:
r
I c~~ ~A~CIl
I
.
t.= .
RRST R..OOR PLAN
1/8'.1-0-
IoEaWICAL
..
BAS8veJT PlAN
118" . 1-0'
i
,
i
I.
1
\'
..,1
~~~
1
1
Cit~ of Stillwater
~~;}. City Hall Feasibility Study
.' ,;f;ir. ,..."
...~ 'WM~TI
- ~:;:.=. = _',~ .=;;j P~t..~.~
PLANNING REOUESTED PROVDED
CITY P~tlG 320 330
LA YOUT IMAP STORAGE 2.0 250
SECRETARY IRECEPTIO/.\ST 100 100
TOTAL 660 680
DIFFERENCE (+201
.'J BUILDING INSPECTIONS REOUESTED PROVDED
BUILDING INSPECTOR 200 200
ASSIST ANT /LA your SPACE 283 280
TOTAL 488 480
DIFFERENCE (-8)
"7 PUBLIC WORKS REQUESTED PROVDEO
CITY ENGIIoEER 200 200
DRAFTNG ROOM 530 560
SECRET ARY a. 100
TOTAL 844 860
DIFFERENCE (+16)
SUPPORT REQUESTED PROVDED
MAYOR 180 180
SMOKING ROOIoI 120 !eO
LUlCH ROOM 400 .00
CONFERENCE 250 220
TOT AL (THIRD FlOOR) 2,942 2.980
DIFFERENCE (+361
"*,
).
s=( <:\:: = _c.c:.p P~A~"~
ADMlNIST A TION
CITY COORDINATOR
ACCOUNTlNG
f.....NCE DtRECTOR
ASSIST ANT FtlANCE OflECTOR
PERSONIEL DIlECTOR
COPER/FAX/MCROACHE
COIM'I./TEll AOOIoI
VAULT
AOMNSTRA nvEW SUPl'OflT
WAlnlGJLOB8Y
COUNCL CHAMBEIlS/STORAGf
CONFERENCE ROOM
EH1llY FOYER
REQUESTED
200
256
200
\oW
\oW
120
170
200
600
235
Ltl80
250
210
PROVDEO
200
190
!eO
150
150
70
100
200
.75
235
\700
180
300
TOTAL
DFFERENCE
4,359
4,110
(-249)
FLOOR PLANS
:i.~
':.1;:,,::',\;::"
ASSIST ANT I
LAYOUT
- --'~...
:.J1~t~~;f
~~ ~~ -':-,~-
LAYOUTI . ,
IoIAP STDR. "
....
UIlC:IflOOW
...
?ffi::r:;~ i~f,~Wt~,
. IlRAfTHCl ROOIoI ;-'
"'.Wr
...
e
,,---,
( 1
I I
I I
1 ~i'= )
1..- I
I I
1 I
I I
I }
'----
~~~%2
MAYOR
...
..;r-'~'~r~~
~Cll'ET .
REC6'T,
. .~...
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
VS" . r-o'
~=.'~:., "~f '--1; M'.~~'---""'l
f'" . I I_ ,
, I '\.:, VAU.T li art J I
M~-----,;. ... r. COOII), :I I
H iLr~." a
;J r, , EXPAHSIOIl
I iPERSOlH:l. ~ - \ ~1 POTeHTIAI. I
~T f'N.\NC!"_ .. .. ..
~ ".. '1 ~: .. ~ - _.. 'm II
, !U'PORT I!.i'
~ ..' / i ....:) I
I' ACCOlNTIlG 1 'I
M. ~'" ~ 1
. h,;; -,., :, -J./... . , ~ I
!r . . I' '- - - .,
ij~-;:
!l. _.-. ~ ._~.
!---_.--:~
COIM'UTElI
-..
,.
l' I ::1..,:~1":J:.~'
I t=--=-=-=- ."':_=..~
I Ii J
I '\. ' .......
;==,-~,- ~=~r-7f." , ... ,..
. ," "
'1 . .
j' ;\ I
. ;! !.
.: i,;, (I,
!:
;, L~_~_
......
:-.. ~,..
COOIQ.
CIIAIlIlEIlS
.-...;-,
F2."~ '\
! ....
.......
) ,----..
IJ \
\J 1
:1 1
p~= 1
.1 -.. 1
I~ I
U J
-'-----
e
~'=rv.'\,~ 11"" '=1 r"'I.rV:'I".:) ! I~ '
e
e
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and Council
City Coordinator
BWBR proposal to do feasibility study
for Public Works facility
May 12, 1995
Accompanying this memo is a letter to the City Attorney from BWBR proposing to conduct a
feasibility study for a new Public Works facility. TIlls matter is being put on the agenda (for the 4:30
workshop) because it is somewhat related to the discussion of the City Hall expansion/remodeling
project.
Recommendation: Enter into agreement with BWBR to prepare feasibility study for new Public works
facility,
,
4(A
~
e
~ -
BWBR ARCHITECTS
Architecture, Interior Design
a400 Sibley Street Suite 500
.SI. Paul. \l1nnCSl1ta 5510 I
0122223701
fa" ()I~ 222 Xi.J61
May 3, 1995
Mr. Dave Magnuson
City Attorney
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Stillwater Public WorkslParks Facility
Feasibility Study
Commission No, 95045.00
Dear Dave:
We are pleased to provide this proposal for architectural and engineering services to
study the feasibility of a new Public WorkslParks Facility in Stillwater. As per the
request we received from Nile Kriesel, this proposal is for architecturaVengineering
services to tour the existing facilities and determine space needs for development of a
consolidated facility. In addition there is the possibility of incorporation of a
Transportation Garage/Facility for the Stillwater Area Schools District Office.
Similar to the feasibility study we performed for the City Hall last year, we think a
logical approach for this study would be to break it into the following phases,
1. Information gathering.
2. Information analysis.
3. Concept development
4. Final report and presentation.
Each phase has a specific objective and is broken down into specific tasks on the
attached work effort analysis.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Please find the attached work effort analysis and schedule indicating individual tasks
included in this proposal and estimated time of completion. Note that the project
schedule is preliminary and the actual dates may vary. We are proposing that the first
two phases be completed initially which would include Information Gathering and
analysis of the information, then a determination could be made on whether the
subsequent phases would be necessary. Phase 3 would include developing alternative
concepts to meet the requirements of the Public Works and Parks Facility as well as the
School District, and fmally Phase 4 would be preparation of a final report and
presentations to the public and council.
.
Mr. Dave Magnuson
Stillwater Public Works/Parks Facility
Commission No. 95045
May 3, 1995, Page 2
-
An aspect of this study would be to evaluate a selected site to determine the feasibility
of developing this facility on that site. Detailed development of physical spaces for this
facility is not included in this study, however would be necessary if this becomes an
actual construction project
SCHEDULE
BWBR and its engineers are prepared to begin this work by the end of May with
completion in early July.
COMPENSATION
Compensation for the above seIVices will be on an hourly basis with estimated fees as
follows:
Phase 1 - Information Gathering
Phase 2 - Information Analysis
Phase 3 - Concept Development
Phase 4 - Final Report and Presentation
Phase 5 - Engineering Analysis
(To be performed during Phase 1 and 2)
Phase 6 - School District Transportation Building
Total (estimated)
$1,000
$2,000
$3,500
$1,500
$1,500
$1,800
$11,300
This fee is based upon the enclosed work effort analysis which indicates approximately
126 hours of professional seIVices for all four phases. Hourly rates will be based upon
our standard rate schedule as follows:
Employee Classification
Principal
Senior Project Manager
Senior Project Designer
Project Manager
Senior Project Architect
Construction Administrator
Specification Writer
Quality Assurance Coordinator
Project Interior Designer
Project Architect
Senior Staff Architect
Staff Architect
Architectural Technician
Administrative Staff
Hourly Rate
$100 per hour
$95 per hour
$95 per hour
$85 per hour
$80 per hour
$80 per hour
$80 per hour
$80 per hour
$70 per hour
$75 per hour
$70 per hour
$65 per hour
$55 per hour
$55 per hour
el
4 May, 1995
BWBR Architects, Inc.
STILLPRO.DOC
..
Mr. Dave Magnuson
Stillwater Public Works/Parks Facility
Commission No. 95045
May 3, 1995, Page 3
e
The billing rates will be adjusted annually on January 1st in accordance with nonnal
salary review practices ofBWBR Architects, Inc.
All reimbursable project expenses are in addition to the compensation for basic services
and include, but are not limited to, out of town travel and subsequent costs (if
necessary), long distance communication, reproduction, mailing, CADD expenses,
photographic teclmiques and incidental expenses related to the project, and will be
billed at a multiple of One and One Tenth (1.10) times the cost to BWBR. Engineering
consultants are included in this fee estimate and will be billed at a multiple of One and
Fifteen Hundredths (1.15) times the cost to BWBR.
OTHER TERMS
Any additional services beyond the scope of services indicated will be perfonned upon
written authorization from the Owner and will be compensated on an hourly basis as
indicated above.
This Agreement may be tenninated by either party upon seven (7) days written notice.
In the event of tennination, BWBR will be compensated for all services perfonned to
the tennination date together with reimbursable expenses due.
Cost estimating and various identified concepts will be perfonned by the City's
construction manager, George W. Olsen Construction. Actual bids and negotiated
construction costs may vary from such estimates and accordingly BWBR does not
warrant such estimates.
Payments for professional services rendered and reimbursable expenses will be paid
monthly upon BWBR's statement Payments to BWBR under this Agreement shall
include a service charge of one percent (1 %) on any amount not paid within thirty (30)
days after the date of billing.
This letter is the entire Agreement between the Owner and BWBR Architects. Changes
or additions to this Agreement must be in writing and must be signed by both the
Owner and BWBR.
Dave, we are excited about the possibility of continuing our work with the City of
Stillwater. The work we have done with the City over the last 15 months has been
rewarding and we look fOIward to the possibility of a continued long working
relationship with the City. We would be very open to discussing and modifying the
above mentioned work tasks, schedule, and proposal as required, or modifying the
services as we continue through the study. Please feel free to contact either Pete Smith
at 290-1937 or me.
e
4 May, 1995
BWBR Architects, Inc.
STILLPRO.DOC
Mr. Dave Magnuson
Stillwater Public WorksIParks Facility
Commission No. 95045
May 3, 1995, Page 4
..
e
We appreciate the opportunity to provide services to the City of Stillwater. If
acceptable, please sign and date both copies of this Agreement, return one copy to us at
your earliest convenience retaining the other copy of your files.
Respectfully submitted,
BWBR ARCIllTECTS, INC.
c.~~~~l~
President & CEO
CJS:dp
cc: Nile Kriesel, City Administrator
Pete Smith, BWBR
Enclosures
4 May, 1995
Accepted:
CITY OF STILLWATER
(TypedlPrintedName and Title)
Date:
e
BWBR Architects, Inc.
STILLPRO.DOC
CITY OF
Stillwater City Hall
Feasibility Study
......,.
Comm No 94022
BWBR Architects
. . . . .
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nav Dee Jan Feb Mar ApI' May
1 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 4 11 1825 8 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 4 11 18 251 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27
Ischematic Design
Pricing
Review
-
Design Develop't
Pricing
Review
Constr'n Documents
Quality Assurance
Bidding
Construction
I I I I
e
e
RE:
. I~J ~v~
Nile Kriesel ^~ f:\ ~ :( ~ J11~
Diane Deblon, Finance Director [r< ~. . (Q) Y.
Proposed Expansion and Remodeling of City Hall~ ; "3 OfJV' .
MEMORANDUM
e
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
June 14, 1994
It is my understanding that the proposed building remodeling as originally
presented to the City Council on May 17, 1994, will be made available to the
public at the open house scheduled for today.
Inasmuch as the remodeling is proposed to alleviate overcrowding and increase
efficiency, I would like to point out my concerns that the proposed plan will
increase inefficiency and create overcrowding for the Finance Department. The
following is the basis for my concerns:
1. The proposed remodeling reduces current square footage of the
deparunent by ahnost 20% - 725 s.f. to 600 s.f.
2. The proposal assumes one additional staff person within the
proposed 600 s. f.
3. There is no modification planned for existing rooms to allow for
better allocation of space within the department.
e
..
TIMOTHY J. BELL
CAPTAIN
DONALD L. BEBERG
CHIEF OF POLICE
e
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
POLICE DEPARTMENT
M E M 0 RAN DUM
FROM:
D.L. BEBERG, CHIEF OF POLICE
~p
TO:
MAYOR KIMBLE AND THE CITY COUNCIL
DATE:
MAY 12, 1995
RE:
AGENDA ITEMS FOR COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 16th
PETITIONS - INDIVIDUALS - DELEGATIONS - COMMENDATIONS
I will be bringing LARRY BUBERL, BRADLEY ALLEN and ANTHONY SPENCER
before the Mayor and City Council for the following;
1st: LARRY BUBERL to be presented with a resolution (95-117)
commending him for his 22 years of service as a part-time police
officer by Mayor Kimble. Following Mayor Kimble, I will be presenting
him with a plaque from the Police Department.
2nd: BRADLEY ALLEN for "swearing in" as a full-time police
officer, by the City Clerk, followed by introduction to the Mayor and
City Council.
3rd: ANTHONY SPENCER for "swearing in" as the full-time parking
enforcement officer, by the City Clerk, followed by introduction to
the Mayor and City Council.
95-38
e
212 North Fourth Street, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Business Phone: (612) 439-1314 · 439-1336 · FAX: 439-0456
Police Response I Assistance: 911
e
e
...
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Tim Thomsen
DATE:
May 12, 1995
RE:
Pioneer Park Project
Before Dick Blekum was hired in 1962, there was a caretaker at Pioneer Park. His name was
Herman KeIrn. After Dick Blekum was hired in 1962, Mr. KeIrn stayed on with Dick for 2 'li to
3 years before retiring. Before Dick Blekum came, Mr. Keirn and a Mr. Peterson who lived on
Wilkins Street in Stillwater built the steps, flower beds, and fire pit in Pioneer Park. Over the
last 30 years the fire pits have been rebuilt three times due to vandalism.
None of the rock or brick in the steps and flower beds were from the Isaac Staples mansion.
Mr. KeIrn and Mr. Peterson hauled it all in from different parts of town. At one time they
brought in big boulders, placed them around the circle drive and painted them red. The only
thing at Pioneer Park that is part of the original Isaac Staples mansion is the west wall along
North Second Street and part of the south terrace.
"
,
..
e
"'SaJ
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612490-2000 800 325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT A TlON
May 9, 1995
RE:
Stillwater, Minnesota
Myrtle Street
L.I. 307
S.A.P, 169-104-08
SEH No, A-STILL9413,01
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The contractor, Arcon Construction Company, has completed about half the project for the Myrtle
Street Concrete Rehabilitation, At this point, we have marked all the repairs required on the total
pavement section, and we have cataloged these repairs to try to estimate what the full contract cost
will be, While some quantities will be reduced, some increased and some remain very close to the
same, the net estimated construction cost to complete the project at this time will increase by
approximately $37,000. This increase is required because of additional joint repair required in three
categories and an increase in spot surface repair,
It is typical on a project of this nature to review the progress and estimate the completion part way
through the project such that certain repairs may be reduced and/ or eliminated, However, since
this pavement has not received any major rehabilitation or maintenance since it was constructed
in 1966, we would recommend that all the required repairs be made; especially the proposed joint
repairs, As the contractor removed the existing concrete pavement adjacent to the joints, it was
hollow underneath for some distance on each side of the joint indicating that water entering the
joint, which was not properly sealed, has washed the fines and aggregate out from under the
concrete pavement. Eventually, this will weaken the edges of the pavement at the joints and cause
breaking off and additional expense in maintaining the pavement. We would recommend that this
type of joint repair be completed at this time so that the pavement will provide the City with
another 30 years of service life.
e
As the Council may recall, this project is a State-Aid project, and the overruns that we anticipate at
this time would be funded with MSA funds, When the report was completed in July of 1994, the
mock assessment roll provided for $48,600 in assessments for the street work and $10,600 in
assessments for the sidewalk repair, These figures could be maintained if the Council wishes, and
the increase in joint repair would be funded under State-Aid funding, The construction cost on the
project provides for $222,560 in MSA funding, $18,982 in City funding and $17,805 for preliminary
engineering which will be paid under the State-Aid funding process. The $18,982 of City funding
is for sanitary manhole rehabilitation, hydrant removal (which will be funded by the Board of Water
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Sf CLOUD, MN
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
MADISON, WI
LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 9, 1995
Page 2
Commissioners) and hydrant replacement and the City share of mobilization and traffic control and
the installation of sign panels to reduce the speed limit as required by the variance, We do not
anticipate at this time that the City funded portion of the project will increase, In addition to the
above funding sources, the City will also receive funding from the State for a portion of the
construction engineering.
The contractor's progress is right on schedule, and we do not expect the engineering cost to overrun
on this project. This type of project does move relatively quickly, and the inspection costs are,
therefore, less than a typical City project.
Once again, the procedure for repairing concrete pavement is not inducive to exact construction
estimating, We have attempted to provide the Council with as accurate construction estimates as
possible on this project, We also want to keep the Council informed of the project progress. We do
recommend that the designated repairs be completed and that additional cost for construction be
taken from the City's MSA funds.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me,
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
(jlU~
Richard E. Moore, P.E.
tlo
c: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
Diane Deblon, City Finance Director
Nile Kriesel, City Coordinator
..
,
e
e
e
e
~ ';bee '2)~
~~~~
~ 111. '1te44., ?c:te ~
MEMORAN.-DUM
To: Mayor and City Council
From: George W. Ness, Fire Chief
Re : Request permit fees for tank removal.
The State of Minnesota requires that if a underground tank: containing a flammable liquid has
been out of service for a period of 1 (one) year shall be removed from the ground in a manner
approved by the Fire Chief. Just in the month of May 1995, we had requests to remove 4 (four)
fuel oil tanks. We need a permit fee to cover time spent on inspections.
216 ~ ?tutfId. Sbuee StdtfQ4tef1" 11t'Je 550K2
(612) 489-6120
(612) 489-181K
(612) 489-1818
ju. (612) 489-0456
MAY 10 '95 16:22 FROM MPLS FIRE DEPT
PAGE.002
~PPLlCllTJON FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE
STORE. HANDLE QRh US,,"- FLAMMABlE......LIQUIDS. (F3..4-S)
e
Location__
Business name
T~_-
Mailing address
Phone I
No. of tanks/containers
No. of tanks/containers
No. of tanks/containers
No. of tanks/containers
---W-1ilI
Contents
Contents
Contents
, ,Contents
Capacity
Capacity
Capacity
",--Capac i ty
Tanks being removed or installed
Pumps installed or removed
Business purging tanks
Tank installer/remover
Address
pql1~
No.
Phone
Phone
Date &. time of installation or removal
Remarks:
-....
NOTE: The Fire Prevent~on Bureau shall be notifie~ AT lEAST,g~ HOURS prior
to the instal1atlon or removal of any gasollne or flammable liquid
storage tanks and before any piping from flammable liquid storage
tanks is removed or altered.
iThe unders'igned hereby makes application for the above certificate and
agrees to comply with the city ordinances and rulings of the Fire
Prevention Bureau, and hereby declares that all the facts and
Irepresentations stated in this application are true and correct.
ISigned
Paid: Cash(amt.)
Check(' &. amt.)
,Date issued
Rjiiwable
iN~Renewable
Date expires
1 "' By
Certificate IUO
iApproved
Date
.PERMIT2
MAY 10 '95 16:03
FROM MPLS FIRE DEPT
PAGE.002
GUIDELINES FOR SAFE HANDLING FOR THE
INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF CLASS I LIQUID TANKS IN MINNEAPOLIS
e
REFERENCE - NFPA Standard #30 (1972 edition)
Uniform Fire code - Article 15 (1973)
Fire MAr 44 - State of Minnesota
BEFORE ISSUING PERMIT ~ Verify zoninq requirements
PERMIT REQUIRED - Chapter 173.420 (Section 15.103)
For storage, removal, installation or replacement.
Repair operation on flammable liquid tanks.
DEFINiTIONS:
FLAMMABLE LIQUID - Flash point below 100 degrees F (22.8 degrees C).
Class lA - Flash point below 73 degrees F (22.8 degrees C)
Boiling point below 100 degrees F (37.S degrees C)
Class 1B - Flash point below 7.3 deqrees P (22.8 deqrees C)
Boiling point at .or above 100 deqrees F (37.S degrees C)
Class 1C - Flash point at or above 73 degrees F (22.8 degrees C)
and below 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C)
, INSTALLATION OF OUTSIDE ABOVE GROUND TANKS (Section 15.703)
Restricted locations - Above ground tanks for the storage of
gasoline in connection with any filling station are prohibited.
"The storage of Class I flammable liquids and Class II combustible
liquidS in above ground tanx$ outside of buildings is prohibited
within the fire limits."
INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND TANKS
,e
Location - Class I liquid tank distance from nearest wall of any
basement or, pit shall be not less than one .(1) foot and to any
property line that may be built upon, not less than three (3) feet.
Distance between t.anks, one (1) foot minimum.
Prior to issuance of a permit to install any underground metallic
tank for flammable liquids, the. Fire Harshal shall be provided with
the results of a soil resistivity test, conducted by a person
recognized by,the Fire Marshal as qualified by experience and
training in these test methods.
When corrosion protection is required for the tank and its piping,
it shall be provided for by one or more of the following methods~
1. Use of protective coatings or wrappings,
2. Cathodic protection, or
3. Corrosion resistant materials of construction.
MAY 10 '95 16:04
.
FROM MPLS FIRE DEPT
PAGE.004
page 3
VENT PIPING (U.F.C. 15.215-a)
e
Vent pipes from tanks storing Class I liquids shall be .so located
that the discharge point is outside of the buildinq, hiqher than
the fill pipe opening and not less than 12 feet above the adjacent
ground level. It shall disoharge only upward and not be obstructed
by devices that will cause excessive back pressure. . It shall
terminate in a .safe location. It shall not be trapped by eaves or
other obstructions and shall be. at least ,five (5) feet from
building openings.
(Size of. vents - Table II - 9 NFPA '30)
REMOVAL OF TANKS
Tanks, which have been buried and subsequently excavated and moved,
may not be re-installed without re-certification by the original
manufacturer or testing laboratory.
TANK REMOVAL GUIDELINES
When removing ta~ks containing flammable liquids or when making any
alterations in piping, all provisions of the Code of Ordinances
173.240 Section 79.113 sh.all be, complied with. In addition, the
following will apply:
1. Permit will be required for removal of tank.
2. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HOST B! NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE.
Inspectors will be available Monday through Friday, 8 a.m~ to
4:30 p.m. Any overtime will be at contractor's expense.
3. Tank will be pumped as dry as possible before operaeions are
stareed.
4. To prevent static electricity accumulation, tanks will be
purged with a proper ground.' maintained between C02 supply and
tank.. Use 50 lb. of carbon dioxide per each 1,000 gallon
capacity of tank.
5. Vents and fill pipes will be removed and. tank secured with
metal caps and plug. before tank is removed from ground.
6.A cable sling or choke shall be used to raise tank from ground.
Pipinq or lift hooks shall not be used for lifting nor shall
. tank be pushed or dragged from hole. Care should be taken to
prevent rupture of tank.
All adh.~ing dirt shall be removed from the tank before loading
on truck for removal. The tank shall be removed. at once to a
safe disposal area outside the city of Minneapolis.
Prope~ fire extinquishers shall De provided during removal
operations and "NO SHORING" signs posted in area of tank
remo~al. .
When concrete slab covers tank, adequate protection against
sparks shall be taken in breaking up slab.
Contractor must provide proper equipment powerful enough to
remove tanks in an approved manner.
Evcavation must be filled or property barricaded and warning
lights posted at the completion of each working day.
DEVIATION FROM THESE GUIDELINES MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF
PERMIT BY ~HE FIRE 'MARSHAL. .
""
7.
8.
9 .
10.
e 11-
k...
I 12.
MAY 10 '95 16:05 FROM MPLS FIRE DEPT
. .
",
FIRE QjPARTMENT CERTIFICATE PEE SCHEDULE
Per City Council Action 4-16-92
e 1YPE OF CERTIFICAT.E
, AUTOMOBILE TIRE REBUILDING PLANT
AtrrOMOBILE WRECXING YARD
BLASTING - ONE TIME
BONFIRE - ONE TIME
BOWLING ALLEY REFINISHING
CELLULOSE NITRATE MOTION PICTURE 'FILM STORAGE
COMBUSTIBLE FIBERS, STORAGE & HANDLING
COMBUSTIBLE KA':ERIALS, STORAGE , HANDLING
COMPRESSED GASES, STORAGE & HANDLING
CRYOGENS, STORAGE , HANDLING
DUST PRODUCING MATERIALS, PLANTS HANDLING
L EXPLOSIVES << AMMUNITION STORAGE
L FIREWORKS DISPLAY - ONE TIME
Z FIREWORKS STORAGE
~ FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS, INSTALLATION - ONE TIME
, FLAHMABLB LIQUIDS, REMOVAL - ONE '!IDlE.
5 FLAMMABLB LIQUIDS - STORE, HANt'JLE OR USE
6 FUMIGATION - ONE TIME
1 GARAGES, MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR
1 HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS, STORE OR. HANDLE
2 HIGH PILED STOCK
'1 JtJNK YARD
11 LIQUEFIED PETROL'ElJM, TEMPORARY
,2 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM, STORAGE
.4 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM - U.G. INSTALLATION
~3 LUMBER STaRAGl!:
[1 MAGNESIUM, STORAGE , HANDLING
~l OPEN FLAME OR CANDLES IN ASSEMBLY AREA - ONE TIME
)2 OVENS, INDUSTRIAL BAKING & DRYING
;1 SPRAT r!NISHING/OIP TANK Op~ION
Cl TENTS OR AIR SuPPORTED STltUC'rt11\ES - ONE 'tDm
1.'. . TIRE STORAGE
1.'3 TANK VEHICLE TRANSPORTING FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS
iU WASTE MATERIAL HANDLING PLANT
rq2 WELDING OR CUTTING
~".1- :;Z88
PAGE.005
In
$25
$25
$25
$25
$15
$25
$50
$25
$35
$35
$50
$25
$$25
$25
$40 per tank
$30 per 1:ank
$50
$25
$25
$75
$50
$35
$25
$AS
$75
$50
$25
$25
$25
$50
$25
$25
$25q$35
$25
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer kt. /
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: HOURLY BILLABLE RATES FOR SEH SERVICES
Discussion
Attached is a schedule showing the hourly rates charged for various staff members of SEH.
These are the hourly rates charged for working on Stillwater projects. Each year these rates are
adjusted. We are currently working under an old contract which should be revised. However,
the contract calls for an annual adjustment of rates. No action is necessary on this issue. This is
for Council information only.
.
..
SCHEDULE
e
HOURLY BILLABLE COST
BY CLASSIFICATION(l)
CLASSIFICATION
BILLABLE COST(1)
OFFICE STAFF
Principal
Project Manager
Project Engineer/ ArchitectIPlannerlScientist
Staff Engineer! ArchitectIPlanner/Scientist
Lead Technician
Senior Technician
Technician
Associate Technician
Word Processor
General Clerical
$91.45 - $122.50
$71.15 - $116.25
$57.95 - $ 99.05
$44.80 - $ 75.00
$52.00 - $ 70.40
$46,50 - $ 62,60
$35.50 - $ 51.50
$32.70 - $ 43,25
$30.50 - $ 47.40
$27.75 - $ 47.40
FIELD STAFF
Lead Project Representative
Sr. Project Representative
Project Representative
Survey Party Chief
Survey Instrument Operator
Survey Assistant
$47.90 - $ 75.00
$43.25 - $ 58.75
$35.65 - $ 52,55
$41.85 - $ 68.00
$31.60 - $ 42,15
$24.80 - $ 40,15
(1) The actual rate charged is dependent upon the hourly rate of the employee assigned to the
project. The rates shown are subject to change,
Issued:
Expires:
April 28, 1995
April 1, 1996
ie
\
e
Special Meeting
STILL WATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
April 25, 1995
7:00 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Absent: None
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Finance Director Deblon
Community Development Director Russell
City Clerk Weldon
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Revised City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan.
Council held a public hearing on the revised City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan.
Community Development Director Russell presented background on the development of
the revised Comprehensive Plan and gave a brief overview of the 13 sections of the plan.
Glen Van Wormer, traffic consultant, presented the transportation section of the plan.
Ann Terwedo, City Planner, presented the community character, and trails and parks
section. City Coordinator Nile Kriesel presented the public facilities section.
City Attorney Magnuson discussed the implementation of the plan.
Council recessed the meeting at 8:27 and reconvened at 8:40 p.m.
Mayor Kimble opened the meeting to comments from the public:
Mary Schulte, 628 W. Olive Street, stated that the plan preserves the character of the
City; the streets are pedestrian friendly with distinct neighborhoods and creative design.
She suggested 10+ acre parcels and tax incentives, small farms and community gardens.
Bob Lockyear, 1016 North Third Street, stated that the plan is well thought out with
balanced growth, preparation for business park, studies of parks, traffic, and zoning.
Burt Rivard, 1209 - 80th Street, Stillwater Township, stated that he has requested
annexation of his property and now is not included in the annexation area. He asked to be
reconsidered for inclusion in the annexation area.
e
Greg Kroening, 12480 72nd Street North, Stillwater Township, supported an equitable
distribution of land, rather than slicing all into 2 ~ acre parcels.
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special meeting .
April 25, 1995
e
Allen Heiffort, 8753 Neal Avenue North, questioned whether his land is in the proposed
annexation area.
Don Peterson, 7130 Mid Oaks Avenue North, Stillwater Township, stated that 64 percent
of City residents who responded to a poll were opposed to annexation. He suggested a
City/Township election be held.
Tim Sinclair, 14411 Dellwood Road, Stillwater Township, stated that 67 percent of City
residents want no growth.
Barbara Medinger, 8802 Stonebridge Trail, Stillwater Township, stated that in the old
Comprehensive Plan, the purpose was to maintain the character of the City. In 1992 the
City tried to annex six properties. She suggested safeguards should be implemented to
prevent long term self interest of City officials.
David Johnson, 1114 Arcola Trail, representing Stillwater Town Board, stated that he
appreciates being part of the process as a member of the ad hoc committee, but is not
endorsing the plan. The density is unacceptable; there is an absence of a specific
assessment policy; and he wants no neighborhood commercial in the area. He submitted a
position statement signed by the Stillwater Town Board.
Joe Neitz, 7865 Manning Avenue, Stillwater Township, stated that he agrees with Dave
Johnson's views. He stated it will only benefit a few and the rest will suffer.
William Spanger, 12811 North 62nd Street, Stillwater Township, stated that he lives in
the Township to avoid City problems. The township is doing a good job and should be
left as it is. The Township has its own Comprehensive Plan and that should come first.
Mike Gair, 15650 23rd Avenue West, Plymouth, spoke on behalf of the Township. He
stated that the estimated 1200 unit increase could escalate to 2456 units because of
market forces. The estimated 5,000 population increase could be an increase of 8,000 to
10,000.
Bob Worthington, 601 2nd Avenue South, Minneapolis, Evensen Dodge Inc. fiscal
consultants for Stillwater Township, questioned the cost-effectiveness of the plan.
Louise Bergeron, 11123 Quirt Avenue North, Stillwater Township, Superintendent of
e
2
e
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special meeting
April 25, 1995
Public Works for the Township, presented information on the impact on Township roads
caused by the plan.
Jean Batterton, 1240 N. 42nd Street, Stillwater Township, stated that 2 Y2 acre-5 acre lots
will limit opportunities for people her age to find land in her hometown.
Sid White, 6286 Stillwater Blvd. N., asked about future land values and taxes
Mark Stockwell, Evensen Dodge, Inc., asked about the fiscal impact on the Township.
Jerry Hicks, 10680 North Stonebridge, Town Board representative, stated that the
Bergmans on Highway 36 want to keep their farm property, and do not want to be
annexed into the City.
Carl Brooks, 8640 Neal Avenue, stated he opposes any annexation. The majority are
against the plan, and he agrees with a referendum vote.
Richard Kilty, 118 West Oak, stated there will be problems with transportation in the old
part of town and there are not enough parks in the old part of town.
Robert T. Rutscher, 12412 McKusick Road North, stated that he supports the Township
Board position statement and supports Mr. Kilty's statement.
Sheradyn McClain, 911 5th Avenue South, supports the idea of planning for open space
but does not see it in the plan.
Dave Rug, 1124 Nightengale, stated that Stillwater is the right size now and it would be
of no benefit to the City to expand.
Glenn Thompson, 1919 West Oak Street, asked about costs for growth. He stated that
there is no benefit in annexation.
Hod Irvine, 12525 72nd Street, complimented the City on the process, but stated the plan
does not reflect the input. The densities are not wanted by anyone except the developers
and planners.
Pat Tierney, 717 Pine Tree Trail, wants the school district to stay the same quality.
e
3
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special meeting
April 25, 1995
e
Richard Schubert, 8822 Stonebridge Trail, stated that he is against the proposal and it is
not reflective of the wishes shown in the survey.
Mayor Kimble noted that the public hearing record will be open for written comments
until May 5th at 4:30 p.m.
Council recessed at 10: 10 p.m. and reconvened at 10:20 p.m.
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Possible resolution employing temporary laborer.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole to adopt the
appriopriate resolution employing Mike Asmus as temporary laborer. (Resolution 95-103)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
2.Possible resolution employing full-time secretary.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings to adopt the
appropriate resolution employing Sue Thorn as secretary. (Resolution 95-104)
Ayes - Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
3. Levee Wall Proiect
City Engineer Eckles updated Council on the levee wall project.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to direct the City
Engineer to work with the Corp of Engineers and prepare an additional report. All in favor.
4. Property Purchase at 1004 South Holcombe
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Bealka to adopt the appropriate
resolution authorizing the appropriate City officials to sign the agreement and pay earnest money
for purchase of property at 1004 South Holcombe. (Resolution 95-105)
4
I
.
e
e
~
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special meeting
April 25, 1995
Ayes - Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays - None
Mayor Kimble extended condolences to the family of Dave Johnson.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Thole to adjourn the meeting at
10:40 p.m. All in favor.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Resolutions:
No. 95-103 - Employing Mike Asmus as temporary laborer
No. 95-104 - Employing Sue Thorn as Secretary
No. 95-105 - 1004 South Holcombe property purchase
5
City o~ .
g tiQQwoteft, uUlVlVlegoto
cP ftOcQOvnOHOVl
HONORING OLDER AMERICANS AND SENIOR CITIZENS
WHEREAS, The month of May is being observed as Older Americans Month in
Minnesota and throughout the nation; and
WHEREAS, This year's theme "Aging: Generations of Experience" focuses on the
many and varied contributions of our older citizens to their families and to society; and
WHEREAS, The experience, skills, and abilities of Senior Citizens are a valuable
resource in the St. Croix Valley, and have contributed to the progress of our community,
and
WHEREAS, Senior Centers affirm the dignity, self-worth and independence of older
persons by facilitating their decisions and knowledge, and enabling their continued
contribution to the community; and
WHEREAS, Encouraged and supported by the Older Americans Act, Senior centers
function as service delivery focal points, helping older persons to help themselves and
each other, and offering service or access to community services as needed; and
WHEREAS, The valuable contributions of hundreds of our older Minnesota citizens and
the Senior Center should be recognized for the precious resources they represent and
serve.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVI~:O, that I, Jay Kimble, Mayor of the City of
Stillwater, Minnesota, by the authority vested in me, do hereby proclaim the week of
May 14-20, 1995 as:
SENIOR CENTER WEEK
calling upon the people of our community to honor older Americans and the Senior
Centers that bring together activities and services to their benefit.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of
the City of Stillwater to be affixed.
u\J\aYOh
City o~
g tiQQwate/l, u\;(l""egota
Ce/ltlblcate Ob c.App/leClatiO"
pttegented to
JAMES STEVENSEN
RESOLUTION NO. 95-116
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota
that for his faithful service to the Stillwater Fire Department as Assistant
Fire Chief, James Stevensen is hereby commended; that recognition be
given to the fact that for the period of 22 years he has been employed by
the City, and he has served the City faithfully, efficiently and courteously.
The Council regrets that Assistant Chief Stevensen has retired, but
extends to him its best wishes for the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be, and is hereby
authorized and directed to spread this resolution upon the official record of
proceedings of the Council and to deliver a certified copy thereof to James
Stevensen.
Adopted by Council this16th Day of May, 1995.
uUayoll
City o~
g tlQQwaten, uU i~~egota
Centlbicate ob cAppnec{atlo~
pnesented to
e
LARRY BUBERL
RESOLUTION NO. 95-117
SE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota
that for his faithful service to the Stillwater Police Department as Part-time
Police Officer, Larry Suberl, be, and is hereby commended; that
recognition be given to the fact that for the period of 22 years he has been
employed by the City, and he has served the City faithfully, efficiently and
courteously. The Council regrets that Officer Suberl has resigned, but
extends to him its best wishes for the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be, and is hereby
authorized and directed to spread this resolution upon the official record of
proceedings of the Council and to deliver a certified copy thereof to Larry
Buber!.
Adopted by Council this 16th Day of May, 1995.
vUoyolt
e
It
e
FENCE PERMIT"APPLICATION
CITY OF STILLWATER
Community Development Department
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Ordinance No. 792, Section 31.01, Subd. 25(m), Fence Regulations
Permit No.
Date: S- - Jd.. - CJ:5- <\ ~
Fee: $25.00 ~\1
~l
Address of Property: /300 !JrJ1u nds 0 t"\. P Ja Cle
Legal Description of Property (Lot, Block and Addition): 10 f t, I /3/k 1) (J a K G/e'1
Property Owner: "1'/ I of- D1'(:) I\t: b f b}6 i'- Representative:
Mailing Address: 136 (l A V'Y'-lA ~,,-d <:..() "" ~ '-_:_ Mailing Address:
Telephone No.: l{,~q~lo/~I(~) Telephone No.:
Signature: ;1 ~1\.l :Jv II.iJ(JY'-------"' Signature:
Type ofFence: X Wood! Privacy Y Chain Link Other
Height ofFence (at ground grade): ~ ft. front yard ~ ft. rear yard -La... ft. side yard
Include surveyor accurate site plan showing fence in relation to all property lines.
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted
herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, are true and correct. I further
certi I comply ~th the p rmit if it is granted and used."
\ i
~ CJ-
.2 -/';}...- <)
Date
l'
Property Owner/Repres ntative Signature
OFFICE USE ONL Y
Conditions of Permit Approval:
~fo(rf-- /~ S1vL4
,
~) C\ V 'O~(;l./vu.~
~L
Sf f1..,~tvv-o~
....
e
Approved: _
Denied:
)-IL~ 7 r
Date
o Denotes Iron Monuments Found
· Denotes Iron Monuments Set
x Denotes Spike set for Bldg. Control
xXx.x Denotes Existing Cround Elevations
[xx.x] Denotes Proposed Final Grades
B.M. Storm Sewer Manhole, Rim Elev. 902.50
>hrmJ Inv. = 896.94
'Y/rJh Ik>Ie
PROPOSED TOP FOUNDAtION ELEV. 916,i "-
PROPOSED GARAGE FI.OOR ELEV. <)(16." t:
PROPOSED LOWER FLOOR. ELEV. 9ol.r:!:
I
NOTE;.Ver1fy all proposed grades
with actual plans.
~z
'/ 0101_
\ 4 ,101 .
7' . Dt
,/ ....
.. \~
~. .
..... ~
. 4-
.10 v
0'" 1\ /
I ~~o';(~
<'.'v ~
.
..
AMUND''50N PLAC.~
I ~- -~-'r::~~~~:1' W ~
I,
-/00,04 -
I
" .I
/"IZ: -
o f
. I
01
"'!
,. ,...,
'I
)
f
tl
",j
. ~ \) .
" Pr
'~ ~}.'f l '0"'')
_.. "''' 3 CJ . 0'" ":o".."^ ~ # .
, ~ ,,~c~
9,$'P ~ ,," '" ~~ ~
" '" ........
"," ,. 4,.. 0" ~ f- PYO~" .$.~J "
o ,~" " I ~ r" '11\
~ " c:;-~ v _ , ~" '" " ~
'-I " CXl
<",'- ""'" . -l'" "t
'- "'\. ~ ~ 4-1>' 0 , " I '\., l o,,!. Q.,.. , ,
" 1~o+.1 90+\\ ,." '.
, 0 - ,
I . " "-
, fe'i'U:. " I~' " '.
I ~".- - '~"''''
1(1',;) ~. 1 \ ~J , "
'- _. r--' ,- - 90't.~
,~o+'~\ '~. f ,tG . ~..'"
~'ltJ\ p(~~; ;.l~t~ f-~;~:~:
" ; Jh: J t & \ e ~- \ I /
\ 1,{'\Y..,J. ~ 1Jh, 'J ...',
~~ j <-".;;1' ':
.. yO;: ; d'~ '.. I, J /'
) (h. (l,o
~ SJ"',,/',..:< 'J
') ') . . '.,' \.
.,J, ~'(l ....
;, ,v. ~ <; .( I I
~ \ . I'
'*) \
t- ~("('.~ ~
~..~ t L D~:;~~'1 ~ t-JrT +;...-. €~~ ~M ~,,+
. 6'')'';'
v q"
0., \
f)
~
It
~
~ '"
~ f(I
~
I ~
woo~ I
~"~
" 9.1' ~ 3 0 . 0
-;,.'b
;c....,
I -,
I ~
\..
~ IlO
-'
o \t OJ
i ...~ .1
,0 ICI
I "
...J._......!.f~
\
LV
f
/
u
r9.
)
Ii:', '
7-'- I' "ce~ )
-~ rp'(\.~('
11
'07'1 -., 1'~'
'... \)
- II o. 0 <:) - ~ol..f
NS~. f8' 5~"~
+
B
r
,..,.
o
'"
III
J
"s"
II)
-- ()
II) ,
,j ~
~
L~
~t)
I
Iii,: 20
I~..
,~
..
I
~111
/:
il .
HooP
r~
:I~
Ii
'I
11
:j J
..1....
~! ~
11 '"
" \I
0' (
i! 0
:1 'J
H .
,t
~ll
~ll ,
1.
;j
;,
:j
"
/.
iI
; ~
,;
,I
I:
I,
i.
I:
.J
~l
"
o
"-
V>
; ~
III
J
,I
'-'I
~l ~Q
I
N
e
\JJ
')
-
tJ:
p,
"<
()
\fJ
D
'2
':J\
~
<l
e
l' .-/ .
.~. r--&
.
-.
Ordinance No. 792
An Ordinance Amending the Fence Ordinance
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILL WATER DOES ORDAIN:
Section I. Amending. Section 31.01, Subd. 25 (m) of the Stillwater City Code entitled: Fence
Regulations as follows:
m. Fence Regulations.
1. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for the regulation of fences in
the City, to prevent fences being erected that would be a hazard to the public, or
an unreasonable interference with the uses and enjoyment of neighboring property
and are compatible with existing uses, other zoning restrictions and drainage
ways.
2. Definitions. For the purpose of this ordinance, the following definitions shall
apply:
a. Fences shall be any lineal structure used to prevent access by persons or
animals or prevent visual or sound transference.
It
3.
Permit Required. No fence shall be erected without first obtaining a fence permit.
Application shall be made to the Community Development Director along with a
fence permit fee in the amount of$25. The Community Development Director is
authorized to issue a fence permit if the application indicates that the fence will be
in compliance with this chapter. The Council shall hear and decide appeals when
it is alleged that the Community Development Director was in error. The appeals
shall be taken as prescribed in Chapter 31, Administration.
4. Fences may be permitted in all yards, subject to the following:
a. Fences in excess of six (6) feet above the ground grade shall be prohibited
unless the abutting neighbor consents to a higher fence and permission is
granted by the Council.
b. The side of the fence considered to be the face (finished side as opposed to
structural supports) shall face abutting property.
c. No fence shall be permitted on public right of ways,
d. No fence shall be erected on corner lot that will obstruct or impede the
clear view of an inter-section by approaching traffic.
It
e.
In resid~ntial districts, fences located in the front yard beyond the building
I I II I 1'~IPI"'---'"
.. .. .
")
line shall not exceed 42 inches-in height.
f. No fence shall be erected where it will impede a drainage ~ay or drainage
easement.
g. No fence shall be erected before all lots within a drainage system or
platted block have had the final grade established and approved and all lots
within the system or platted block have had turf established with grass
seed or sod."
5, Fences may be permitted along property lines subject to the following:
a. Fences that require continuing maintenance such as wooden privacy fences shall
not be erected within one foot of a property line.,
b. Fences in commercial or industrial districts may be erected on the lot line to the
height of six feet; to a height of eight feet with a security arm for barbed \Vire.
6. No existing fence in violation of this section will be allowed to be replaced or rebuilt.
Should an existing fence be replaced or rebuilt, it must come under the regulations of this
section.
i.
~
7.
No fence shall be erected where it will impede a drainage way or drainage easement.
8. Violations ofthis ordinance may be enforced by injunction and the City shall be entitled
to the remedy of abatement in order that a fence erected in violation of this section may
be removed.
Section II. Saving. In all other ways the City Code shall remain in full force and effect.
Section III. Effective Date, This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law.
Enacted by the City Council this 19th day of July, 1994.
(}kt~77f~~
Charles M. Ho ey, ayor
Attest:
~tJJk
· City Clerk
~
Published: Stillwater Gazette
July 29, 1994
..
e
e
,
.
.
.
of<
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-115
A A Hanson Electric
A B M Equipment
A T & T
Abbott Paint
ACE Hard ware
Airport Medical Clinic
Amdahl, Chris
American Linen Supply
American Planning Association
Armstrong Rigging & Erecting
Atec Associates
B M S Integrated Office Tech
Bartkey, Robert
Business Equipment Bokerage
C D P Imaging Systems
Calibre Press
Camiros
Capitol Communications
CATCO
Cellular One
Chemsearch
Copy Cat Printing
Courier
Crimmins, Daniel
CUB Foods
Cy's Uniforms
Dorsey & Whitney
Egghead Software
Erickson Post
Fire Guard Sprinkler Service
First Trust
Firstar Stillwater
GAS B
G & K Services
Gagnon Printing
Geis, Cynthia
George W Olsen Construction
Gordon Iron& Metal
Greeder Electric
Heritage Printing
Holiday Foods
Images of the Past & Present
Independent School District
J H Larson
J J C Recycling
Jim Hatch Sales
Junker, David
Kimble, Jay
Lake Country Chapter
Lawson Products
League of MN Cities
Lig h t Poles
Hose/Nozzle-Vactor
Maint/Long Distance/Rental
Paint/Brushes
Park Supplies/Wire
Physicals-Spencer/ Allen
Locksmith Services
Towel Service
Membership Renewal/Service Fee
Install Lights
Enviromental Study
Service Agreement-Typewriter
Basketball Nets
Transcriber/Ink Cartridges
Copier Maintenance
Training- Felsch
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Phone Atennas/Service Agreement
Brake Pads
Mobile Phone
Cleaner
Printing Services
Legal Publications
Safety Boots
Plan tings- Everett
Uniforms
Legal Services
Software
Gasoline/Diesel
Pipe-Sign Posts
Paying Agent Fees
Principal-Oak Glenn Note
Codification
U niforms/Mops/R u gs-Cleanin g
Business Cards-Geis
Mileage
UBC Building
Oxygen
Service Calls
Building Permits
Soap
Film Processing
DARE Basketball Game
Repair Kits
Recycling
Rubber Gloves
Flower Pot
Meals
Conference-Barthol/Ness
Nuts/Bolts
Conference-Weldon
2,700.00
386.92
210.19
142.95
29.42
619.55
350.46
31.42
669.00
170.00
385.00
276.00
5.33
530,02
186,37
179.00
66.86
113.90
114.92
242,40
152.58
179.02
76.88
50.98
150.36
883,78
155.00
628.14
3,716.01
378.08
303.63
9,029.21
42.50
1,035,45
29.02
18.60
15,000.00
20.24
2,167.00
297.77
8.95
26.31
233.22
13.38
11,990.55
74.93
18.09
10,00
250.00
70.93
105.00
Legislative Associates
M I I Life
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Waste Control Com
Miller Excavating
Minn Comm
MN Clerks & Finance Officers Assn
MN DARE
MN Dept of Public Safety
MN State Treaurer
National Fire Protection Assn
National League of Cities
Ness, George
One Hour Express Foto
On-Site Sanitation
Plaza Tire and Service
Reliable Office Supplies
Road Rescue
Russell, Step hen
S hort- Elliot-Hen drickson
St Croix Animal Shelter
St Croix Car Wash
St Croix Office Supplies
Stack, Barrett
Stillwater Area Chamber of Com
Stillwater Gazette
Stillwater Motors
Tower Asphalt
Treadway Graphics
Uniforms Unlimited
Valley Auto Supply
Valley Trophy
Van Paper
Viking Office Supplies
Warning Lites
Washington County Attorney
Washington County Central Services
Washington County Recorder
Washington County Sheriff
Wybrite
Zee Medical
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
A T & T
Burmaster, Russell
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Soil & Water Conservation Dist
Northern States Power
U S West
Valley Trophy
We is Builders
Consultant Services
Term Life Insurance
Legal Services
Sewer Service/SAC
Level Area-Sand/Salt
Pager Service
Membership-Weldon
DARE Graduation
Training-Work Stations
Forfeiture Money
Memebership Renewal
Books
Siren
Film Processing
Portable Restrooms
Tires
Toner Cartridges
Alcohol Wipes
Meals/Car Wash/Mileage
Engineering Services
April Boarding Fees
Car Washes
Office Supplies
Easement Description-Levee Wall
Annual Banquet
Publications
Repair Parts
UPM/Payment #5/7-LI 296-300/301
DARE Supplies
Lenses
Repair Parts
Retirement Plaque-Buberl
Paper Products
Office Supplies
Barricades/Lites
Forfeiture Money
Paper
Recording Fees
Computer Space Rental
Computer Maintenance
Medical Supplies
Long Distance
Janitorial Services
Sales/Use Tax
Browns Creek Water Monitoring
Electric/Gas
Telephone
Plaque-Stevenson
Reimbursement-SAC
...
..
2,895,00
1,104.93
7,627.26
121,299.20
420.00
6.12
30.00
28.80
550.00
378.00
336.75
23.00
195.00
64,81
151.95
185,18
231. 24
154.92
82.99
22,655.37
170,83
17.00
68.34
2,690.00
420.00
169.20
19.80
109,519.10
36.84
7,77
874.27
76.45
299.00
94.72
533.39
756.00
165.51
154.00
525,00
334.00
61.72
.
.
96.04
240.00
212.00
230.00
4,277 .42
505.90
103.10
11,325.00
.
346,928.24
.
.
.
..
Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of May, 1995.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
.
.
.
Contractor's Licenses
Council Approval May 16, 1995
Geo. W. Olsen Construction Inc.
1902 South Greeley Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
General Contractor
Renewal
A-I Paint Works and Roofing
507 West Maple Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Painting
Renewal
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
~
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: REQUEST FOR FEE REIMBURSEMENT FOR PLANNING CASES
Deanne and Jon Stratte made application for an easement vacation ($100) and variance ($75) for
planning applications.
After making application, they requested withdrawal of the application. At that point (see
attached letter) they requested return of their application fee.
Staff recommends a partial refund because of the staff time put into the cases and cost of
advertising for the public hearings.
Recommendation
Refund $87.50 or 50 percent of application fee.
Attachment
Letter of May 4, 1995 requesting refund
Hay 4, 1995
e
Steve Russell
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th St
Stillwater MN 55082
~n.~\~
t]-/U
Dear Mr. Russell:
We hereby withdraw our requests for variances for improvements to our
home on Lakeside Drive. The people that we have worked with on this project
were surprised that a simple variance would generate such vehement opposition.
We have decided to drop this project because we are not able to handle the
stress of the opposition. We also request the return of the $70 filing fee
and the $100 filing fee.
We'd like to express some of our feelings at this time in regard to some
of these issues. The intent of the bluffland/shoreland regulation was,
as we understand it, to prevent proliferation of construction visible from
the river. Our proposed construction could not be viewed from the river and
would have been l60-180 feet from the river. We really did not think that
there should be any problem for this small addition. It seems to us that
the bluffline/shoreland regulation has been twisted by some people for
their own use to block people on the river from making improvements to
their homes. We are in the same city limits as the hotel which is going
to be built right on the river level (in the flood plain). We are in the
same city limits as the marinas which have been allowed to extend farther
and farther out into the river, but we would be prevented from improving
our home to benefit my health. This certainly smacks of discrimination.
When the Wild River Act was put into effect, our home was already here.
Now we are made to feel as though we are terribly wrong just for our being
here or wanting to improve our 30-year-old homes. Our homes are referred
to as substandard. How would anyone like to see their home referred to
as substandard in newspaper articles, pamphlets, etc? Who is protecting
our rights as given in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution? Why should
we pay $5,000 a year in taxes if our homes are substandard and our neighbor
across the street can dictate what we can do with our home? Yes, we know
that people everywhere have to get variances for various reasons. However,
in this case, the utility easements along Harbor Road were never dedicated
to the public.
Furthermore, when the Wild River Act went into effect, people who were
outside the city limits were paid 157. of the value of their property for
easement rights. We, in our six homes on the river on Lakeside Drive have
never been reimbursed. Yet, we have the restrictions imposed on us. Legislation
was recently passed in the House that addresses this very issue. To quote
Rod Grams in an article in the Stillwater Evening Gazette, "Our Founding e
Fathers correctly envisioned that private property rights are the underpinning
of a free society. They also realized the Fifth Amendment's protection
of property rights fosters the personal and economic freedom that are instrumental
to a free society and its heritage."
~u/,
It ./ Sincerely yours.
CLAIM AGAINST CITY OF STILLWATER
e NAME OF CLAIMANT PA TR \C.'I1+ J'. V \ E. r<.S
ADDRESS
\ J. 4 S i l< C \-\ Wo~ D D y~ \ V E'"
PHONE NO. +3 <9 - <0 '1-0 <<0
WHEN DID EVENT OCCUR?
WHERE DID EVENT OCCUR?
"3-"&<:>.-~5
9 fk \<... 0 F H~ S IE 0 I\J TH E H ILL
WHAT HAPPENED? ~ f"\ v
\...~\\ IS
IS -t-vv e h~)\
J
o v+ C>
'N'j
\t:) t-\. ~ YNLn.\..
'f\ 0
WHY DO YOU FEEL THAT THE CITY WAS AT FAULT? ~ c.....:3'-'h~ shks
'^') pV;o~v'~ ;"'-L\\JJ...~~ ~~ In\ +-=- +~ -:k~f~t-.A- f'=>1c.,s,r
.1: C- "- ~ \ ~\- CA- Y\.,! ~ Y\..l2. ~ V"--\. 0 (:'~ x ~ '" ~ l\ 6. c- ~ '" S-A..
c: c'" ~ +- t-s 'r' -0 .\- YY'\ ~ V\....L. . TL.L (. .: 6,.~
+-h.. ~\~} -ps-roosc-c...\- Mv)..\-\.... vJ~oJ t-\-L:b ~ f.2AVM{~ 4L~ ~\...... .",- tL-. ~
STATE THE N~URE OF THE DAMAGt AND THE COSTS ASSOCI~TED
, I _ \ , I ~ ( l').-::l
; ~ S i "^-J.. A.. S 1'\ t'Y" '^'+~ "" 16 ~a -
o..J-\-~ \~ Q.... So -+ { ~"" \3'-0 ~ .-
~~v~Vv"'J... \..V<-~ r-<.~~-s-~ - '2 p""Y1"'('~ ~o~s I P uS
NAME OF PERSOWMAKING REPAIR; OR GIVING CARE I
I\.,. h,,~,...s \~\.,," 1i3'SJ
')-%-'15
DATE
pcl_ ~ \J~
SIGNATURE
You have to formally notify the City in writing within thirty (30) days of the
occurrence of an event whereby you feel you have suffered damages.
eM". ,J""t.v w '^-' cW+ c;.~.l K"", WS o+' +lr< {UYU b L........
e
e
iO~ ~ .I IJ'"' \-v~~'V)~ /...\M ~\OC\J i.\
p .;I~'~
,-",,1"'"'
e
l -r'S",-rdyo I-vv. S! 5~'\t
I'"" 0 V\ - """ 0 "" S "It f\ ~
V\~~./' t
\Tj
'1-'-
fI:3,
e b..,
/::..., "
1- '~':
j- J...,:::-".
~"........:~
f
. ,-.;SF W),lk.....,
'.. ',~,"" H""~56
<(y : <1'.
'........ Jx "k,
" '" .....,S.
'........ ~',~
,"", J ~/-e.o
~.....
'.
;:.
'::"
-,
'..
f
,-
,
,
~,.:- ...."
/.(' ~t
,......
>.
t,
.(-
\,
\:)
)../tJ<'
f<J
,}P
~/i
'\
I-.
r/.~
. ,
...""
, "-
',,-
\,
\..
"
\
-/''''J
"\:'
./
./
,cf
{1.,.,,'otr
Po~
e
\
,r
/'
./,.,.,"J
\ /'
\\./ ,
./ '\,... "'- ,
/' '\'......
\\\ t::.:~ _.....~ ,
\. ~.., ~.
\
\,
'0
'\
"
,
,
-H.' ~;III.I.\\\TER
, 'lllll:1 "";!
I",
...,
...,
-,-.,~
. "
( !;\' '"
,.l ,- \.4p' \
\~""'''''\
I ~.~r.._ \
I . ,'-!-? \
I -, . ''...l. .
'=?~~3) 1
.....-- I'.
..
I''''
,
\ r"~""-'"
: ~. '.--, ,
...
/#- '~-~ ",
.....,-.-t.. -
"
~"
....,.)
'),
~
,
"
\,
"
"'
., '',,''
, 0:>"':.
';'~'
,~
, ~ ~ '/' "
\ .)-'
~~:~~<~;:." j
1
,I
'T ;1
0:0" '
"
I
I
t! ~
.,1
"..(1('
'.._'... --,.jw ".-.'" .
/
. LG220
(Rev.4I'2IlI3)
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Application for Authorization for
Exemption from Lawful Gambling License
Fill in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and
send it in .t I...t 45 day. before your gambling activity for procsssing.
~Nanti:Cl1id'idd;eS$::o.fhrgarttz.:&tio'n:::::::::'::i':'::::':i:::>'i::'::::::;::::::;:;"::':::::::?::'d}:';::i:::::::'::::\,:::i:::((::::::::;;::":,
FOR BOARD USE ONLY
FEE CHK
INIT DATE
e
I_I
Curr~l8v1ous ex8fllll nurroer
NA
Stl8et
5110 Northbrook
Chlel executive Olllcer
Check the box that indicates your proof of nonprofit
status and attach a copy of the proof to the application.
[J.IRS designation
~ Certification of good standing from the Minnesota
Secretary of State's office
o Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter)
Bingo
Raffles
Paddlewheels
Ti boards
Pull-tabs 0
I declare all information submitted to the
Gambling Control Board is true, accurate,
and complete.
Signature 01 person I8ceMng appIcatlon
Dale Received
e
This form II be made available
in alternative format (i.e. large
print, braille) upon request.
Mall with $25 permit fee and copy of
proof of nonprofit status to:
Gambling Control Board
1711 W, County Rd. B, 5te. 300 5.
Roseville, MN 55113
White - Original
Yellow - Board returns to
Organization to complete
shaded areas
1,c!- 1 \o.o-rfO>- '\ -!.'j ....... ">" \
e
APPLICATION TO CONSUME
Applicant Information
N2.me ,:.f ,:.t'g an i = at i on___~\:\..___S.&tWl____f~~~~~~C_______________
App 1 i c'?,nt N.?C.io:? (F'.lll) _~Q.'::a.Q..~h___V2.:.._.B~i:.~~r___________________________
S'ct'e:t Addt'ess_1Qly__.w_._R~~~~_U~___~__ B it-th Dc.te_~___~_:.~{__
City_~L~~,-__________ St~te_J~_____________ 2ip__S~~_~____
Ho:.me Ph.:.ne(~.!.~'::LY.1~1:]~~:L W.:.rk Phon(~Lli):~tl:.i}:_~~
"
Facility Information
Pad,. 0'- fad 1 i ty tQ9';z,ljed_li"f~$J:.-e._i?dLr;dJ~
Date to be used2fl~~:..:JL::_L~9~ Time t.:, be. USEd-:~l.9.n..Q..~=JJ~QQ_~~'
N'.lr,ibet. '-:;'T peq;':'T"'S e:-< p~ct eq__1.{tQ,_~~.k._..:.?_____________
P'.l;'p.:'se (s.:.ri;ball Qco:me, wedd,ing, etc.) --S't:11J_~tL____~____________
Type of activity(fl.lnd t'aiset., dancing, CI1I.lsic, etc. )..8.tf__.n..l!..I?f)~n..~~T
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Check Appropriate Information
________Beer to Consume
________Liquor to Consume
__X___Beet. t,:. Sell a. C.:.nsl.lme
________Liql.lor to Sell & Consume
________1,.Jine t.:. C.:.nS'.lC'le
________Wine to Sell & Consume
Secl.lri ty I nformat ion ( Ir,t 2t'r'c.l Use onl y)
P.:.l icS! Officel~ Req'.lit'ed by City? __~__Yes. _______N.:,.
Officet' Rate ,-:;.f Pay s_;:to._C~__.
Mail Licer.se To: (If diffet'ent than applicant)
e
---------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
CITY HALL: 215 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 6i2-439-5121
e
e
"
~EMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer /!....e./
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO.1 FOR L.I. 300 MULBERRY STREET
RECONSTRUCTION
Discussion
Attached is a change order for the Mulberry Street reconstruction. This change order was
necessary due to a safety issue concerning a retaining wall and sidewalk.
Recommendation
Council pass a resolution approving Change Order No. 1 for L.I. 300
CHANGE ORDER
"'SEH
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE. 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL. MN 55110 612490-2.000' 800 325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
e
City of Stillwater
March 28, 1995
OWNER
DAll!
L.I.300
1
OWNER'S PROJECr NO,
CHANGE ORDER NO.
Mulberry St. Reconstruction
STILL3390
PROJECr DESCRIPIlON
SEH FIUl NO,
The following changes shall be made to the contract documents
Description: Revise contract amount for installation of top cap along retaining wall
north side of Mulberry station 2+60 - 3+80.
P\lrpose of Change Order: Because of retaining wall adjacent to sidewalk a top cap had to be
installed to re-attach the railing.
Basis of cost [8JAcrual
Attachments (list supporting documents)
[]Estimated
CONTRACT STATUS
Time
Cost
Original Contract
$671,412.05
Net Change Prior
Change this C.O. #1
$4,290.00
$675,702.05
~? ;: cf J-
Barry C. Peters, P. E.
Revised Contract
Recommended for Approval
SHORT.ELLlOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
A~to~.
By
Approved for Owner:
City of Stillwater
By
f//ZOT JI'f/TL
1TI1.E
By
e
Distribution
Contractor 2 Owner I Project Representative I SEH Office 1
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC,
MINNEAPOLIS. MN
ST. CLOUD. MN
CHIPPEWA FALLS. WI
MADISON. WI
LAKE COUNTY. IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
e
Ie
~
RESOLUTION NO. 95-119
APPROV AL OF CHANGE ORDER
FOR MULBERRY STREET RECONSTRUCTION, L.I. 300
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater,
Minnesota, that Change Order No.1 for Mulberry Street Reconstruction, L.r. 300, at an
approximate cost of $4,290.00 is hereby approved; and the appropriate counci1member and
staff is hereby authorized to sign the necessary forms.
Adopted by Council this 16th day of May, 1995.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
e
Ie
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
SUBJECT:
Goodwill Dropoff Agreement
DATE:
May 12, 1995
Accompanying this memo is a Continuance of Memorandum agreement between the City and
Goodwill Industries for the collection of household goods. TIlls agreement has been in place for about
four years now and requires Goodwill to accept household goods as part of the City's recycling
program. The funds are actually pass-thru funds that the City receives from the County specifically
for dropoff centers, In other words the funds would only be available for dropoff centers and not for
the City's curbside recycling program.
Recommendation: Approval of the agreement(~ )
/t/~
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF CONTINUANCE
FOR GOODWILL DROP OFF CENTER
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that
the Memorandum of Continuance for Goodwill Drop Off Center, attached as "Exhibit A", is
hereby approved.
Adopted by Council this 16th day of May, 1995,
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
..
e
e
Give me a fish and I'm fed
for a day. Teach me to fish
and I'mfedfora lifetime.
~C~Ave
81. Paul, MN 55108
(612) 646-2591
FAX: (612) 649-0302
Goodwill Industries, Inc.lEaster Seal Society of Minnesota
MAR o. 1J9S
March 6, 1995
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, Mn 55082
Attention: Nile Kriesel
Dear Nile,
I have enclosed three Memorandum of Continuances for
1995. Please forward them to the Cities of Bayport and
Oak Park Heights after you have signed for Cottage
Grove. After the continuances are signed by all three
cities, please return them to me.
I will copy the signed Memorandum of Continuances and
send each city an original copy.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely, ,
c/mdee ~~
Linda Garcia
Collection Manager
CONTINUANCE OF MEMORANDUM
JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 1995
e
It is hereby agreed that Goodwill/Easter Seal (hereinafter
Goodwill) will provide collection services to the Cities of
Stillwater, Oak Park Heights and Bayport, Mn (hereinafter cities).
The scope of services includes the acceptance of household
materials for reuse, as identified in Attachment A. To provide
said services, Goodwill will maintain an Attended Store Donation
Center at 14460 N. 60th Street, Stillwater.
The term of this continuance of original agreement is for January
1 - December 31, 1995.
Goodwill agrees to maintain its liability insurance to cover the
Attended Donation Center.
The Cities agree to pay $.50 per household for the collection of
reuse material to Goodwill, as identified in Attachment B and to
provide advise and counsel to Goodwill for the services provided
by Goodwill.
Other than stated in this memorandum, the provisions of the
original agreement shall remain in force.
Passed and adopted this
day of
, 1995.
Date: , By:
City of Stillwater
Date: , By:
City of Oak Park Heights
Date: , By:
Date: ;:;;- c; - 9j-, By:
City of Bayport
Goodwill/Easter sea~~~~
e
ATTACHMENT A
e
ATTENDED DONATION CENTER
CITY OF STILLWATER, OAK PARK HEIGHTS & BAYPORT
GOODWILL - ADC ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS 1995
* clothing * games and toys
* lamps * curtains
* linens * knick-knacks
* hardward and tools * small working appliances
* portable working tv's and stereos
* good condition furniture, bed frames, tables, sofas,
etc. (acceptable at the store locations only)
GOODWILL - ADC UNACCEPTABLE MATERIALS - 1995
* hazardous waste * household hazardous waste
* tires * carpet, carpet scraps & pads
* plumbing fixtures * large counsel stereos and
tv's
* household batteries * scrap metal
* large appliances (refrigerators, freezers, stoves/ovens,
washers, dryers, air conditioners, dehumidifiers, furnaces,
garbage disposals, microwaves, trash compactors, water heaters,
etc. )
* automotive items (lead acid batteries: lubricants, additives
and oils: antifreeze, etc.)
* mattresses, box springs (including water bed mattresses)
* recyclables (glass, aluminum, newsprint, cardboard, office
paper and plastic)
Ie
ATTACHMENT B
e
CONTRACT COSTS ARE SHARED ON A PER CAPITA BASIS BETWEEN THE
CITIES, DETERMINED BY THE MOST RECENT CESUS DATA.
1995 Total Cities Population = 7,645 x .50 = $3,822.50
Stillwater
5,447 x .50 = $2,723,50
1,410 x .50 = $ 705.00
Oak Park Heights
Bayport
788 x .50 = $ 394.00
e
e
e
,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
Steve Russell, Community Development Director ~
DATE: May 12, 1995
FROM:
SUBJECT: Recommendation to hire City Planner
The interview process for City Planner was conducted May 5, May 12, and May 15. Jeff
Johnson, Heritage Preservation Commission Chair, David Junker, Parks and Recreation Board
Chair, and Amy Stefan assisted in interviewing eight candidates,
A final selection will be recommended for Council approval at meeting time. I anticipate having
the Planner hired around June 1.
Recommendation:
Approval to offer City Planner position to recommended candidate,
.
.
i.
I
.MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA:
May 16, 1995
RE:
AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE NEW CITY PLANNER
As a result of the interview process and evaluation of education and experience of 70 applicants,
I would like to recommend the hiring of Susan Fitzgerald as the new city planner. She has a
Bachelors Degree in Landscape Architect and 15 years of planning related experience for private
developers, Dairy Queen and Target and public agencies, City of Bloomington.
She has experience in both parks planning and heritage preservation. She lives in the City of
Stillwater and was recommended highly by her previous employer. If hired, she would begin
June 5th.
Recommendation
Authorization to hire Susan Fitzgerald as city planner,
Attachment.
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director (t/'
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: VARIANCE FOR SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
CARRIAGE HOUSE AT 602 NORTH MAIN, WASHINGTON COUNTY
HISTORICAL SOCIETY, APPLICANT
This request is to construct a replica of the old carriage house behind the Warden's house two
feet from the rear property line. Twenty-five feet is normally required. The carriage house is to
the rear of the lot. The land slopes up steeply to Laurel Street.
This item is being brought directly to the council because of its emergency nature and there is no
apparent impact to adjacent property owners. Besides the Warden's house, there are no other
structures within 200 feet of the proposed structure location, This item has been published in the
paper.
Recommendation
Approval of variance and consideration of fee waiver.
Findin~s
The site condition because of topography and ownership pattern and historic purpose (placing the
building as close to its original location as possible) provide a factual basis for the decision.
Attachment
Application and plans
/
e
.. ~tti1ymg1iin(ttilitR~-~s1orttafu~lftiet~-.----
P. O. Box 167
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
May 8, 1995
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
City of Stillwater, Minnesota
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Dear Sirs:
The Board of the Washington County Historical Society
respectfully request a waiver of the fee for a variance
for a two foot set back from property line.
It is the intention of the W.C.H.S. to build a replica of
the carriage house that once stood behind the Wardens'
House Museum on north Main Street. The original footings
have been located and we find that just the southwest
corner of the buildinG would be approximately six inches
over the property line. By moving the building forward so
that it is two feet within the property line, the slope of
the land would still be within acceptable tolerance.
By way of information, the land behind proposed bUilding
is entirely surrounded by a high bluff and only access
would be by a very long ladder.
Thank you for your consideration to our request.
Sincerely yours,
~t tJ~
Charles E. Woodward
President
e
.1Irbeu's ;Houlle flluseum
602 N. Main Street
Stillwater, MN
439-5956
JJoltlIunell ~riekllon ,rag otabin
~1It! ~lIke 'eltool ~ulleum
Co. Rd. 3 & Old Marine Trail
Scandia, MN
433-2762
~outfuell <lIemetert!
Boutwell Road Near Co. Rd. 15
Stillwater, MN
; .p--
e
COMMU;-';ITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILL WATER, MN 55082
ACTION REQUESTED
_Appeal
_ Certificate of Compliance
Conditional or
Special Use Penn it
_ Design Review Pennit
_ Planned Unit Development
Variance
_ Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
Other
_ Engineering Review Fee
Total Fee
FEE
ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAY BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION
Environmental Review
EAW
EIS
No Special Environmental Assessment Required
The applicant shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all fonns and supporting material submitted in connection
with any application. ·
Address of Project (., 0;2. (Ii f\')A 1 tV ST
Zoning District '* Description of Project
HI:) \J ,'> (;' TN t=I 'j" 57 0 0" 0 N I H ( $
SF, ?'AQ/< Foft- SOU7'''' LuES'
Assessor's Parcel No. lOb 9 0 - ~ I b 0
c.orJsr~uiLTIO(\J OF ~l:P<"(<::"A of (!fllZ.ftlf'!b-E'
SITE. NE.ED Vf)ft.lfltvll..f; Fait- IT ~ FooT
(}(Qfl-NE.rt. ClF 73U/t...DINCr- " :5E€ SICr:TQ.H
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply with the penn it if it is granted and used."
, () 1-1 SCitl €T'/
Property Owner W Ii 5 H {tv Cr TOrJ \: OUN r-l ISTOtel e..('J L... Representative
Mailing Address (., 0 ~ N M 191 N ~ r Mailing Address
y.?C 73o~ 1<':'7
Telephone No. <f ,'] 'i - ~q 5' c; Telephone No.
Signature ~ ~ U)~
Signature
Any decision made on this proposal can be appealed within ten calendar days of the date of the action.
PIl: SHfI P€D - SEE' IlTTI'te.HEO tnA-t=>
Lot Size (dimensions) _ x _ sq. ft.
Total Land Area .;1..9. ~c:;,() SQ F t
Hight of Buildings: Stories Feet
Principal ~
Accessory ~ L:?2.~ ~4t.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
Total Floor Area
Proposed floor area
Building Coverage
Paved Impervious Area
Number of off street parking spaces
~a[e of Public Hearing is
*012-/& TCU.JN (\Jew C,r'l Of STILl.WtTTE~
~ -~-..--
e
13_-- B-----
- - -
- ... -. - "- -
----- - - -.
--.---. -. -.-.-.
__. n_ _ _ __ _u_
--- ---
- - ---
- --.- -- -
----. .
-- - - ~
~,--
t.:=::1
n
:
F
l2..
o
IJ
T
[;.
L
J:..
v
A
T
o tJ
.s C; A. L- E:
V4 ": , ~ 0 ~
e
/~
.~
el
o
'~ l~
d -'\MY!/'
/
./'
)(1
.' --.---..------
----~.
/'
./
l'
I
rv}vJ. .
, ~r'yJ~ .
\'
~~\
\
,-t"-
.//"
--~.
\
\
I
\
\
"1.. k;
i,
,
1/--
-fljJ\\lwl r
~J I
/
,/ t:'-\
I """
,
L
,
,
\
\
~-
\
\
!
\
\
\ '
\/
''"--~
~
--------
~_..-_.
-~-t-~
i
.9-
,- :'../'
~(\
/-;~,/
(y
///,~
'~(1
~
--y
e
-- - - - - - - - - --
,- - - - - -ao,;/:-u .-::; =
I
liE' N
.~
.1" J.' (t 7) I'J'.J
....
:!r.~ .................._----0
~~\1... '
... , I
$!~;
"'..... ...
~:,gl ~ ~
~ 0-' ~~
~
"';)
c:..
~
'"
,'-
~ : 'J: :l:l0 I - "'-,
~ , ,
i
" 'J.. 7,: ~1 II
~ -----....... I
.:-, ~~':1 ~ ~~i
~ ' .,,~, l
-J ~.:a~ - - Ol
. ~ f
~,~ -~
.::: ~
Vo _f'~'
"6 .~S ~t.i....: .~
} tt o( jl
"" 'p, ; I
,
.0
....,
''':l
,..~
I~
I~
~
L...
I.,
~
~-
'1.)
,'I>
:!-
,
,
I
I
'.e\li!l'
"'),
'-:;- _ - -0 I
.
I ;
I
I
':? :t
..... :::-
-J(D .
- "
"J ,
"::l
'..:"
June 1904
602 North Main Street
Stillwater, Minnesota Insurance
Map
~2
== = :::.:::: = = == = = : = = = = = =: = = ==- :. .;:a .= = .3: :s :. = 2; = ::: = :;II:::=-:: ::. =:::: = :: ::. .: ~ .: :: = = =-
I(}-~ ~
/ rn
I
,...
d..
':'.oJ ~.;
~ :>
" ''''':lJ~'
,;: ':t:""..j:,
'') '-I.,. ,f>),::J'"J
'J.a:I 7f):>'
1\./ '0
".,
...
,-
"
... ~. .~
.
/,
"
It
It
II
It
II
"
/1
,.
..
II
It
"
"
/I
II
/I
II
II
II
.... "
"II
:::>"
.,
"
"
H
It
Q, "
?O,;
~"
...
~-Ir
'~II
"
"
"
/.
"
"
"
01
:::: I
;.:J !;
.~ Ii
I
II
.~ ~ ~~ I II
~i_ ft~, JJ) "1 "
t:. ~5 r" ~- ,
r, -<3:e ~g~ I
"'~" J I
,~, "" 0
~g. J
0: ~ <\) .. q:: I
H: ;31
''-:l
't)
~-
~~
"" n .....
o ~~~
"
~i'
~, It
....J:::,.~
'J') 1)
'"
....
~~
~
0 .,J ~
c:r."l
~
~
0
l- ~
-
~
~
~
J
"
....
:;5
,.....
\0..
......
~
~ a o~ ,~
\
\
\
\
)
Ilk! t-f,..<<', ///-'
, 'A n._. I (>. 4e. " ,,/ G
.c,f\.''-'.... ' /
1/
I
. "
)(~i
1.::>) a
.1 \)~~
c~
~
.;:
(~\
'0/
~
\
\
\
(JC
I -
r-..
a
Ld
a
cr..
"I::
'....:-::'
,
,
\
\,
~ ,....
...~
('~
;g
\
'<:,--=--
'.:'~1
"
o
(\ .
/
I
(
'\
'..' .."'d?';' !
l't!fl1(l. Y f' N.,>" "
vvr',. .'C :;::;',.I;~'
'.../-100" Sf:: ~
.....
.-//
.-/
,,/
,............,,,"........ ..
"I' :eft' :,,;';;"-rpj' .,.. ....--. ._, ' ~
f 'r "0' .,...,/}.-'I"'". "':L:) ..
-':5~r~.~~:,.,~;.: -,_:-~,,' ..'~~!~,::_~-~-,~WR~~ ..~
/
c
"..lj)
c --
'_ L{") 0
= < ~ - " "V':, _l...)~ =c.;) ,
,::>-
-;;..
..,J,_
---
, .
.- '
o
C ..0.:
>,
\
\
,
..-.:.. -. ~.
, . ~--4>oj--
-, '-
\..-
(',,:,
'z..
'--."
\
\
\
\
\
,
,
,
\
l_-\
\
'.
\
,
\.
~
~
")6-
>.
~
...
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\.
\
\
\
\
, .(\
,I
\
\
/"
/~/
f'
,~,
I i \
(' ~,
; x-<
W/l-SII,Co,(-I(S"fO~ll'o1-l- s ! ~
h1tlSe:tl...... oc.,'ft't"y 0;"':" .......
rr, . _ . t\l
.f, ,- I O'"\t
. 1.51.. De~c(~ f' <(19 .::-.:-::.'-:' 'c "',' ol) ,Yi
~
~.
f; -, fi"'""
.~; ~ .\~/ ~ r:-' !' . ;./'
-----.. ' ...,.. ~< f'"/"
---::.. ~ ~ ' I ~Y' ,
~-.....:::..... ._ ........_ \ ..1 ,,/
../ ~.~ '~.,..., \ (,../
".-- ':". -. ~ 7. 4 ':- .
-"'. Qf ~ '- '--.-::-:." " ~::.,~-. -/. '.". .j:,..,.::,
, ',.' ': ~ '___..... ~ .: -:-- .l) ~ ' .. . ,-,' .~<'- '
~. " "'::::-,-. 'I, ' .
P.JUSbN 'SITE - -- -"'-~'~.~.
NOW \t'APLC ISL/{ND --.--- _'___ .....' I
Ofo~~-O/so _-.
...........-1,)""... ' -
----
--- .
- - -~
'-
OLD
"""~ ~
..,--0
~
.." , --- - -----
;-i
, I
,
!~
;~
,
,
, I
~
41)
{.-) .
. \00
,'d"
L~D 1.
\DIJI
--.---. .
~'O
'}~
~t>'"
\u\9
- -- - ~
.sff<tf
'T ').3
(.,~ . -
- u'Rei.,
tit
<1.
,o! e I
,I __
I b 0' .... r"
" --"r-' L' J.....
I "N_' _
ti./..&,i~' ~ ", ,.....
-r,
1
I
,,/ 10'
'~< "
/ -r r,
I I
---
I rOo
'/ -. (,lj
~ /u
"
~
? ~
,..
I I /.......
I '
" I l1
I
_:' f
I
I
::;
x
~
-.. "....... --.,
--~!-
! I
: /
; I
I j
//1
; I
! j
/1
~r- .i
'I 0
, ;
/ I
, I
"I
\~ '
, " :
, ~i
o ~!
/ ,
~I/
~I; .
I' ~o
~'$I " - ,
~ I . ::-'1
"/'
t f. ~1
Ii' - ~
" I I
~ Ii
If
"
I !
.' f -
II
I
: I
I / ~ ~
" i " vJ\~
! I ~
~
l..:
~
Q.:
~
j
S1
I~':'
c.
~tl;"
() "\ I)
t---/ I
e
Ie
-
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
v
FROM:
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DATE: May 11, 1995
SUBJECT: Final Plat Approval for Autumnwood Subdivision, John Roettger, Applicant.
The preliminary plat for the 20 unit Autunmwood Subdivision was approved by the Council at
the meeting of 4-4-95, Several conditions of approval were placed on the project. The feasibility
study for public improvements was ordered. The feasibility study is not yet completed.
The City has received word :from the school district that there remain issues regarding how
runoff will be handled and improvements paid for from the Lily Lake school site to the east of
the project. The School District and developers are deciding how it will be handled. Because of
these unresolved issues and lack of the public improvements feasibility study including cost
estimates it is recommended that this item be continued to your meeting of June 5, 1995.
Recommendation
Continuation to Council meeting of June 5, 1995 for more information.
Attachments:
Plans
ISD 834 Letter
Washington County Letter of 5-9-95
RESOLUTION 95-120
APPROVING FINAL PLAT
AUTUMNWOOD, SUB/PUD/94-63
WHEREAS, the proposed final plat request, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is consistent with
the preliminary plat and subdivision plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater,
Minnesota, hereby approves the request for Final Plat for Autumnwood, Case SUB/PUD/63.
Adopted by Council this 16th day of May, 1995.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
e
e
MEMORANDUM
e
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: May 11,1995
RE: CONCEPT PUD/PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FORA 10 LOT, 20
ATTACHED DUPLEX UNIT PROJECT
Background - This application has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and
recommendation for approval along with the rezoning of the site from RA, single
family residential to RB, duplex residential (Case ZAM/94-64), This item was
originally heard at the Council meeting of 2-7-95 and subsequently continued to the
3-7 -95 to this meeting of 4-4-95 so that the project could be modified to reflect
concerns raised by city staff and the developer.
The revised attached plans show a 20 unit, IO-Iot subdivision. The units would be
located in a duplex fashion on each lot. The units would be owner occupied. The
project is served by a cuI de sac street off of CR 5. The road width tapers up from 24'
at its entry to 32' past the first driveway. The reduced width at that location is due to
the wetlands location and the setback requirement off a wetland, A sidewalk will be
constructed as a part of the project connecting to the intersection of CR 5 and
Croixwood Blvd to Lily Lake school. This will provide a safer, more direct access to
the school and playgrounds in effect making existing park facilities more available to
area residents. With the new stop light at CR 5 and Croixwood Blvd, it will be much
safer for children who may wish to walk to school. The sidewalk going up to the hill
from CR 5 across the property will be paid for by the developer and the remaining
section to the school could be paid for by the school district or the developer in lieu
park dedication fees.
The road and utility plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer and the
Washington Soil and Water Conservation District and Washington County Public
Works. County Road 5 is under the jurisdiction of Washington County and the
developer will need to obtain a access permit and meet their improvement
requirements,
Because drainage is entering the pond from the project, a settling basin is being
e construct as shown on the grading plan to trap sediments before entering the pond.
The developer has provided staff with a survey of the site showit:\g which trees will be .-
removed as part of the project and which trees will remain. Thirty -five trees will be _
removed according to the plan. The developer shall submit a landscape and planting
plan with the ratio of new vegetation to meet the standards established in the forest
protection ordinance. For the disturbed areas, an erosion control plan along with a
plan showing how the land will be reestablished and stabilized. the city Engineer will
need to review and approve this.
Findings - The project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, development
requirements and maintains site conditions to the extent possible.
Conditions of Approval
1. A road access permit shall be obtained from Washington County Public Works
and road and utility improvements developed according to their standards,
2. The sidewalk shall be constructed from the Croixwood/CR 5 intersection to Lily
Lake school as part of the development. The portion of the sidewalk from the
cul-de-sac to Lily Lake school if paid for by the developer shall be a credit
against the park dedication policy.
3. A landscape tree planting plan shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the
Community Development Director before the final plat is approved.
4. A sedimentation basin shall be constructed according to comments from the
Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District,
5. A grading and erosion control plan shall be approved before building permits are
issued and site grading conducted.
6, A storm water permit shall be obtained from the PCA before site grading begins.
7. The Zoning map amendment ZAM/94-64 shall be approved before final
subdivision and PUD approval.
8. The road and utility plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer
(refer to Memo of 11-9-94).
9, Sidewalk shall be concrete,
10. Sidewalk off cuI de sac to CR 5 shall be installed as approved by the Community e
Development Director.
....;..
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS · HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH · STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-9573
612-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612-430-4350
Donald C. Wisniewski, P,E.
Director Public Works/County Engineer
John P. Perkovich, Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J. Theisen, P.E., Deputy Director
Technical & Administrative Division
James D. Hanson, P,E.
Transportation Engineer
Edward Kapler,
Facilities Operations Manager
May 9, 1995
Mr. Steve Russell
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
John Roettger Subdivision Adjacent to Washington County State Aid Highway 5
(CSAH 5), Stillwater Case No. SUB/94-63
Dear Mr. Russell:
Enclosed is a copy of my letter to you from November 8, 1994, regarding John
Roettger's subdivision east of CSAH 5. To date, none of the conditions attached
to our granting of access have been met. Mr. Roettger has contacted me recently
about getting started and while we would have liked to coordinate his project with
the final paving and landscaping of S.A.P. 82-605-10, our current project on the
road, it appears that our project will be finished before Mr. Roettger's will have
started. '
We, therefore, ask for your continued cooperation so that we can review Mr.
Roettger's plans early for conformance with the existing design. We appreciate all
of your efforts to keep us informed.
Sincerely,
r<Jo<;;tr
Y6seph Lux
Ene.
cc: Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer
John Roettger
Barry Peters, SEH
e
...\luxlbigjohn.ltr
Printed on Recycled Piper
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
WASHINGTON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKS. HIGHWAYS · FACILITIES
11660 MYERON ROAD NORTH · STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082.9573
612-430-4300 Facsimile Machine 612-430-4350
Donald C. Wosniewski, P.E,
Direc;tor Public Works/County Engineer
Jo/'n p, Perl<OYich, Deputy Director
Operations Division
Donald J. Theisen, P.E., DepUty Director
Technical & Administrative Division
James D. Hanson, P,E.
Transportation Engineer
Edward Kapler.
Facilities Operations Manager
November 8, 1994
Mr. Steve Russell
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: John Roettger Subdivision Adjacent to Washington County State Aid Highway 5
(Stillwater Case No. SUB/94-63)
Dear Mr. Russell:
We have reviewed the revised John Roettger subdivision and find it to be acceptable if the
following conditions are met:
1. A Washington County Access Permit must be obtained for the
connection to CSAH 5 (Stillwater Blvd. N.).
2. A Washington County Utility Permit must be obtained for all work within
County Right of Way.
3. Road plans, including cross sections, must be submitted to the County
for approval.
4. The connection of the access to CSAH 5 must be at a 90 degree angle.
5. The developer must construct a right turn lane to serve the development.
This must be constructed according to the specifications of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and as follows: The turn lane shall be 150
feet long by 14 feet wide with a 15:1 taper at the south end. The length of
the turn lane may be adjusted by the County based on the internal street
design and traffic factors. It shall be constructed with a 6" thick Class 5
aggregate base, a 2" Type 31 Bituminous base course, a 2" thick Type 31
Bituminous binder course, and a 2" thick Type 41 Bituminous wearing
course. Where necessary, the existing curb and gutter must be removed
and new B-624 curb and gutter installed to match the existing curb.
e
6, In conjunction with turn lane construction the developer must modify the
storm sewer system to accommodate the width added to the roadway by
Print'" on -.,cled "-
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
the turn lane and the stormwater added to the system by this development.
Any changes to the wetland must be approved by the City of Stillwater.
Computations showing the runoff volumes must be submitted to Washington
C.ounty and the Stillwater City Engineer for approval prior to permit approval.
e
7. All modifications to CSAH 5 must be completed prior to final paving of
S.A.P. 82-605-10, the current construction project on CSAH 5. This work
is scheduled for late May, 1995.
Washington County can construct the turn lane and storm sewer revisions as a
supplement to the contract for S.A.P. 82-605-10 if it is acceptable to the contractor on
the job. All costs associated with this work will be paid by the developer.
Please advise us as soon as the City acts on this subdivision since it is essential to
coordinate turn lane construction with our construction project. If you have questions or
comments please call me at 430-4312.
Sincerely,
c1-~
Aoseph Lux
cc: John Roettger
Glenn Schreiner, SEH
Klayton Eckles, Stillwater City Engineer
Wally Abrahamson, Washington County Commissioner
Don Theisen, Washington County Public Works
Don Wisniewski, Washington County Public Works
e
Prinled on Rocyclod "-,
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
,.
..
KNUTSON, FLYNN, DEANS &: OLSEN
JAMES E, KNUTSON
JOSEPH E, FLYNN
A.AUL W. HETLAND
WI' (1934-1992)
THOMAS S, DEANS
PATRICKj. FLYNN
GLORIA BLAINE OLSEN
STEPHEN M, KNUTSON
MICHAELj. flYNN
MARIE C. SKINNER
MAGGIE R. WALLNER
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
May 10, 1995
SUSAN E, TORGERSON
JOHN j. O'DONNElL
ANNE F, KRISNIK
DIANE M, CORNELL
GREGORY S, MADSEN
CHARLES E, LONG
!\fICHELLE D, KENNEY
TIMOTHY R. PALMATIER
DANIEL), S, BECKER
JE:'NIFER K. ANDERSON
MINNESOTA WORLD TRADE CENTER
30 SEVENTH STREET EAST, SUITE 1900
ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-4900
TELEPHONE: (612) 222-2811 . FAX: (612) 225-0600
Mr. Nile Kriesel
City Administrator
City of Stil!wat r.
216 North Street
Stillwate , 55082
5~
Mr. John Roettger
9376 St. Croix Trail North
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: evelopment of A. Welt Pro~)~rty
Gentlemen:
Over a period in excess of one year, Independent School District No. 834 has had numerous meetings
regarding the proposed development of what has been described as the A. Wert property. There has
also been correspondence exchanged during this time.
At this time, it is our understanding that the development process is well on the way and the school
district has not had a satisfactory response to two concerns that have been repeatedly raised by the
school district. The first issue relates to the fact that school district drainage will obviously be
impacted by the proposed development. It is our understanding that it is the intention of the
developer to resolve the drainage issue by utilization of an underground drainage pipe which would
commence at a manhole on school district property and proceed underground across the A. Wert
property to the existing pond.
The school district deems this expense to be the expense of the developer. However, in the interest
of cooperation, the school district would be willing to bear a share of the cost involving construction
of a manhole and connection of the new pipe to the existing school district drainage facilities. It is
the school district's anticipation that its cost in respect to the drainage will be less than $3,000.00.
Finally, it is the school district's understanding that the city will be granted an easement for the pipe
across the A. Wert property. The school district will have no ongoing obligations for the new pipe
in respect to maintenance or repair.
e
KNUTSON, FLYNN, DEANS &: OLSEN
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
"
May 10, 1995
Page Two
The second issue relates to the school district's understanding that a retaining wall will be built along
the easterly boundary of the property. The grade where the retaining wall would be built is already
quite steep. It is the school district's belief that a substantial safety hazard would be created by the
erection ofa retaining wall unless it is fenced. Consequently, it is our request that any approvals for
the development would include a requirement that the developer provide a fence around the retaining
wall.
The school district has asked us to write this letter. While the school district has been involved in
conversations with the city and the developer, it is uncertain whether these issues have been resolved,
and whether they have been resolved in the manner anticipated by the school district, The school
district is further concerned because there have been suggestions at times that the school district
might be asked to undertake greater financial contributions to this development. The school district
wants to be sure that everyone is aware that the school district has not agreed to any further financial
contributions and it would oppose further financial requirements.
It is our request that you respond with a confirmation that the understandings of the school district
set forth in this letter are correct. Alternatively, if the understandings are incorrect, we would ask
you to state with specificity what is being proposed that differs from the school district
understandings, including any further financial contributions by the school district. If there are such
areas, the school district requests that it be notified of any future meetings, including planning
commission and city council meetings, such that the school district would have an opportunity to be
heard.
In conclusion, it is not the desire of the school district to oppose the development of the A. Wert
property nor to make this matter contentious between the parties. Rather, the school district has been
frustrated in its ability to obtain, necessary information regarding this development. The school
district deems it appropriate at this time to write to both the city and the developer regarding its
position and solicit a response from the city and the developer.
Very truly yours,
./lt4lfl Vl
fi~cl~ .
P1F:mcb
cc: Dan Parker
.
.
7'
.
.
Mr, Dan Parker
School District 834
Stillwater, Mn.55082
Re: Lily Lake Parking lot & Roof drain.
Estimate per S E H, Barry Peters.
560 L f 1 8 II R C P $ 26 . 00 pe r L f
1--- l8" Apron 10 Lf. $37.00 per Lf.
2 manhole base Each $140.00
2 4' 0 manholes 10' Dp. $90.00 Lf
2 R30- 67 Castings $375.00 Each
2 - 24-48 Cones $l80.00 each
Rip rap
$14,560.00
$370.00
$280.00
$1800.00
$750.00
$360.00
$270.00
$18390.00
$919.50
$1931.00
'$"21240.00
5% overhead
10% profit
Total to pipe to pond
Additional Retaining wall required per Carl
This is required because of the sidewalk.
140 Lf. 4' 0" High wall = 560 S Ft. $12.00
5% overhead
10% Profit
Total for wall to accomidate the sidewalk
Peterson Associates.
per Ft.
$6720.00
$336.00
$705.60
$7761.60
4' High Cyclone Fence required by you at wall.
190 Lf. $5.00 per If.
5% overhead
10% profit
total of fence
$950.00
$47.50
$99.75
$l097.25
Pipe to POND
Extra wall
Fence as requested
Total
$21240.00
$7761. 60
$1097.25
$30098.85
Plus Attorney's fee's as they accumulate.
As the developer I do not intend to share any of the above
costs!!
The School District did not have an easment from Almedia
Wert. You took advantage of an old lady who lives in Staples, Mn.
I do not intend to give the District an easment to dump their
Parking Lot & Roof Water onto my property!!
The only way for you to get your water to the POND will
be thru the above mentioned pipe as designed by Barry Peters of
S.E.H.! !
I do not need the sidewalk to Lily Lake School to develope
the property. If you decide that you want the sidewalk across
my property for easy access for the Grade School Students, I
will cooperate. It is your decision. What do you want????
Proper easments for the pipe and sidewalk will be
given to the City of stillwater at the time recieve your answer.
The letter I recieved from Patrick J. Flynn Shows how
you Cooperate!!! I have worked for 22 Months trying to satisfy
all the City of Stillwater requirments.Your letter is a great
help. Thank you.'
Possably you could take the water to the East side of your
building more econinomicaly. If so please do so, you will not
hurt my project.
Yours truly,
J4 Z_~~
John E. Roettger
CC: Robert G. Briggs Attorney
Nile Kriesel City Adminstrator
Shelly Michaelis Realty World
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director V
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT TWO STRUCTURES (4 UNITS OF THE 20 UNIT
AUTUMN WOODS PROJECT CR 15/CROIXWOOD BLVD. JOHN ROETTGER
APPLICANT
The City Council has received a request from Mr. Roettger to construction two, 2-unit structures
as shown on the attached plan. The final plat for the project will be reviewed by the council at
your May 16, 1995 meeting and, according to the city engineer, the feasibility study for public
improvements will be presented to the council at your meeting of June 6, 1995.
The request to build the residences in advance of public improvements is not unusual but this
early in the plan review process is of major concern. The feasibility study has not been
completed. The plans and specs for public improvements have not been prepared, accepted
or ordered. There has been no cash deposit or bond to ensure that the improvements are in to
service the residences once they are finished.
The unknown cost of the public improvements are a concern. Sometimes the cost is a
consideration for the project proceeding or not and the timing of the improvements.
A development agreement should also be in place that assures construction of the public
improvements and conformance with the subdivision and PUD approval.
Anther concern is for coordinating the public improvement contractors and home builder
regarding access to the site and site conditions,
Recommendation
Table request until at least plans and specifications for public improvements are prepared and
development agreement signed.
Attachment
Letter date 4-27-95 from John Roettger and plans,
RESOLUTION 95-120
APPROVING FINAL PLAT
AUTUMNWOOD, SUBIPUD/94-63
WHEREAS, the proposed final plat request, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is consistent with
the preliminary plat and subdivision plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater,
Minnesota, hereby approves the request for Final Plat for Autumnwood, Case SUBIPUD/63.
Adopted by Council this 16th day of May, 1995.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
,
.
.
.
"
. Ap~/L - 2?j 17'1';
Mr. Steve Russell
Community Developement Director
Mr. Jay Kimmel Mayor
City council Members
Do to the interest in my Autumn Wood Project on county road 5
I would like to request permission to start erection of 2 buildings
Building 1 95-4-21 is a one story walk in side by side unit with
no step to enter.
Building 2 95-4-24 is a side by side unit with a tuck under garage.
These two buildings use the same drive entrance requested by Klayton
Eckels, City Engineer. This change will make the area more attractive
.
with less driveways. My intent is to complete the Utilitys, &Street
Work prior to the model opening. I am enclosing a partial plat to
clearly show you the problem of completeing only 1 model.
SEH is completing the utility & Street Plan, & feasability Study
I have Discussed with Barry Peters of SEH, Nile Kriesel City of
Stillwater, & My banker, the possability of me doing the ~provements
myself & financing the same. This would save me a portion of the
30% fee charged for Engineering,Administration, & Legal.
Normal engineering fees are about 7%,1~-2% administration & ~%
for legal.My understanding is that the city employees are to
serve the public & be reimbursed for the costs. Is this to be a
money making venture for the city?
.
'" ',"
.
If the project is to be bid, I int~nd to bid the work, intend to be low
& do the work because I am the person responsible to pay for the work.
I would like to be able to accept or reject all bids which are not
for my best interests. It may be possible for me to be low,do the
improvements & have the City finance the project which I will have
to pay for as the units are sold. I have been in the building business
for 43 Years & have found it is not wise to accept the low Bidder!
My intent is to build a quality project that I can be proud of in
the future. I have A good reputation in the Construction Industry
& I intend to keep it that way! Thank you!
;p,T;Y~~
V John E. Roettger Owner
.
Autumn Wood Addition
.
e
e
.,
MEMORANDUM
TO:, Mayor and City Council
FR: Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
/L}3: /'
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR WILDWOOD PINES 5TH ADDITION L.I. 309
Discussion
Attached is a feasibility study prepared by SEH for the Wildwood Pines 5th Addition
Improvement Project. This development includes eleven new lots. Six of these eleven lots are
being served as part of the Pine Hills Estate Project and the remaining five will be served by a
cuI de sac which will be constructed as part of this project.
Dick Moore will be available to present this feasibility report to the council.
Recommendation
Council pass a resolution Accepting Report and Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans
for Wildwood Pines, 5th Addition, 1.1. 309 subject to receiving an amended developer's
agreement and information on the [mal plat.
e
Ie
.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-121
RECEIVING REPORT, ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
FOR WILDWOOD PINES, 5TH ADDITION, L.I. 309
WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of Wildwood Pines, 5th
Addition, by construction of street, sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer, was duly
presented to the Council on the 28th day of March, 1995; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted April 4, 1995, a report has
been prepared by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., with reference to the improvement, and this
report was received by the Council on May 16, 1995;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
STILL WATER, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council finds and determines that said petition was signed by all owners of
real property abutting upon the street( s) names as the location of the improvement.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution
adopted May 16, 1995.
3, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 16th day of May, 1995,
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
I
e
.
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612490-2000 800325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT A nON
May 11, 1995
RE:
Stillwater, Minnesota
Wildwood Pines
Utility and Streets
L.I..m- 30'1
SEH No. A-STILL9511.00
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The City has received a petition for the construction of City improvements to serve Wildwood Pines
5th Addition, located near the intersection of Boutwell Road and Myrtle Street. The petition was
presented by the owner of the property. The plat consists of 11 single family lots, five fronting on
Boutwell Road and the remaining six on a proposed cul-de-sac. The project will not affect adjacent
properties, so a Public Hearing will not be required, The City Council, at the March 7, 1995 Council
meeting, authorized the preparation of a feasibility report. Drawing No.1 shows the project
location.
Improvements petitioned for include the extension of existing sanitary sewer, water main, storm
sewers and streets. Services to the adjacent lots will also be required. The required site grading will
not be included in the proposed City improvements.
Proposed Improvements
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main
The sanitary sewer construction will consist of the extension of an 8" lateral from the existing 8"
stub constructed under the Pine Hills improvement project on Boutwell Road. The lateral will be
constructed northerly along the proposed road, terminating in the cul-de-sac.
The water main improvements will consist of the extension of a 6" lateral from the existing 8" trunk
constructed along Boutwell Road under the Pine Hill improvement project. The 6" lateral will
extend to the northerly end of the cul-de-sac, terminating with a hydrant. Additional hydrants will
be placed to provide for fire protection and routine maintenance.
Four inch sanitary sewer and 1" water service stubs will be extended to the center of the six lots
fronting on the proposed road. The five lots along Boutwell will have services from the laterals
constructed under the Pine Hills improvements.
e Drawing No.2 shows the sanitary sewer and water main improvements.
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC,
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
ST. CLOUD, MN
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
MADISON, WI
LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Drawing No, 2 shows the sanitary sewer and water main improvements.
e
B. Streets
Street construction will consist of a 24 foot width and mountable concrete curb and gutters, shifted
easterly within the right-of-way to minimize the impact to the wetland area. A 43,5 foot radius cul-
de-sac will be constructed at the westerly end of the proposed street. The street section will consist
of 6" of Class 5 Aggregate base, 2" of bituminous base course and 2" of bituminous wearing course.
Drawing No.3 shows the street improvements.
C. Storm Sewer
The storm sewer improvements will consist of the construction of catch basins at the low point of the
proposed road, located approximately 200 feet northerly of Boutwell Road, A 15" RCP storm sewer
lateral will connect these catch basins and outlet into a small retention pond located along the east
side of Boutwell Road, A 12" RCP storm sewer outlet will direct the runoff from this retaintion pond,
easterly to an existing storm sewer constructed along the westerly edge of the Wildwood Pines 4th
Addition, This existing storm sewer outlets into an existing wetland located along the easterly edge
of the proposed plat. Runoff along the westerly side of Boutwell Road will be collected in a new
cross culvert and directed to the proposed retention pond.
Drawing No.3 shows the sto1D1 sewer improvements.
ESTIMATED COSTS
The total estimated project cost for the Wildwood Pines 5th Addition Improvements is $94,225.
These costs are broken down as follows:
1) Street $ 36,215
2) Sanitary Sewer 19,710
3) Water main 17,090
4) Storm Sewer 21,210
------------
Total $ 94,225
These total project costs include 35% for contingencies, engineering, fiscal, administration and legal
costs. The site grading will not be included as a part of the City Project. The developer will complete
the grading as a separate contract, The five lots along Boutwell Road are served with utilities from
the Pine Hills hnprovements, These services are not included in the above costs. Attached is a copy
of the engineers estimate,
COST RECOVERY
,e
Project costs will be recovered through special assessments against the benefitted properties. Project
costs, including the construction, engineering, legal and adminstrative costs, for the sanitary sewer
e
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 11, 1995
Page 3
The street and storm sewer project costs are assessed against all 11 lots within the plat. The per lot
assessment for the streets and storm sewer is estimated at $5,220.45 ($57,425 project costs and 11
lots), and does not include the grading costs.
Project Schedule
The project does not affect properties outside of the Wildwood Pines 5th Addition plat. A Public
Hearing will not be required. The following is the estimated schedule of the Phase 5 improvements:
Council accepts report and orders preparation
of plans and specifications
May 16,1995
Approve plans and specifications and authorize
advertisement for bids
June 20, 1995
Advertise in local paper and Construction Bulletin
June 23, 30 and
July 7, 1995
July 17, 1995
July 18, 1995
Receive bids
Council awards contract
Begin construction
August 1995
Complete construction
September 30,1995
Assessment Hearing
October, 1995
Conclusion and Recommendations
The project is feasible and should be constructed as described above, The site grading will not be
included in the City project. This site grading will be accomplished under a separate contract.
Sincerely,
s~:cenfJfuC
Barry C. Peters, P.E,
tlo
Enclosures
e
e
I.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May II, 1995
Page 4
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me our under my
direct supervision and that I an a duly Registered Professional
Engineer 5nder the laws of Ire State of Minnesota.
'{\, C~/ l-
Date' ~ ?t.! 9') Reg. No. 14148
Reviewed By: ~ ~1nze_
5J///9v-
. Date
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 05/11/95
, WILDWOOD PINES 5TH ADDITION
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
SEH FILE NO. STILL9511
e ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
EST. UNIT
# ITEM UNIT QUANT. PRICE TOTAL
STREET
1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
2 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) TON 700 8.00 5,600.00
3 TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE TON 210 21.50 4,515.00
4 TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE TON 210 20.50 4,305.00
5 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL 85 1.50 127.50
6 D418 CONC. CURB & GUTTER L.F. 935 6.50 6,077.50
7 SEEDING TYPE 5 AC. 0.8 1,500.00 1,200.00
-------------
-------------
ESTIMATED STREET CONSTRUCTION 26,825.00
35% ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN, FISCAL 9,390.00
-------------
-------------
EST. STREET PROJECT COSTS $36,215.00
SANITARY SEWER
8 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EX. STUB EACH 1 1,200.00 1,200.00
9 8" PVC SAN. SEW. 10-12 L.F. 380 18.50 7,030.00
10 STANDARD MANHOLE EA. 3 1,000.00 3,000.00
11 EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLE L.F. 12 75.00 900.00
12 8"x4" PVC WYE EA. 6 45.00 270.00
13 4" PVC SERVICE L.F. 200 8.00 1,600.00
14 COURSE FILTER AGGREGATE TON 100 6.00 600.00
-------------
-------------
ESTIMATED SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION 14,600.00
35% ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN, FISCAL 5,110.00
-------------
-------------
EST, SANITARY SEWER PROJECT COSTS $19,710.00
e
PAGE NO.1
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 05/11/95
, WILDWOOD PINES 5TH ADDITION
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
SEH FILE NO. STILL9511
e ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
WATER MAIN
15 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB EA. 1 500.00 500.00
16 6" DIP WATERMAIN L.F. 440 12.00 5,280.00
17 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EA. 2 450.00 900.00
18 HYDRANT EA. 3 1,000.00 3,000.00
19 EXCAVATION FOR CITY INSTALLED CORPORATIO~ EA. 6 25.00 150.00
20 1" CITY INSTALLED CORPORATION STOPS EA. 6 75.00 450.00
21 1" CURB STOP & BOX EA. 6 80.00 480.00
22 1" COPPER L.F. 150 10.00 1,500.00
23 DIP FITTINGS LBS 200 2.00 400.00
-------------
-------------
ESTIMATED WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION 12,660.00
35% ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN, FISCAL 4,430.00
-------------
-------------
EST. WATER MAIN PROJECT COSTS $17,090.00
STORM SEWER
24 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EA. 1 500.00 500.00
25 12" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 225 22.00 4,950.00
26 15" RCP STORM SEWER L.F. 82 26.00 2,132.00
27 18" CMP STORM SEWER L.F. 95 26.00 2,470.00
28 12" RCP APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EA. 1 450.00 450.00
29 15" RCP APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EA. 1 550.00 550.00
30 18" RCP APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EA. 2 500.00 1,000.00
31 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASINS/MANHOLES EA. 3 800.00 2,400.00
32 CASTING ASSEMBLIES R-3067 EA. 2 275.00 550.00
33 CASTING ASSEMBLIES R-1733 EA. 1 275.00 275.00
34 RIP-RAP C.Y. 8.8 45.00 396.00
35 GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SY 20 2.00 40.00
-------------
-------------
ESTIMATED STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 15,710.00
35% ENGINEERING, LEGAL, ADMIN, FISCAL 5,500.00
-------------
-------------
EST. STORM SEWER PROJECT COSTS $21,210,00
TOTAL PROJECT $94,225.00
Ie
PAGE NO.2
e
2
f--'
v
ST (:
Ii
c'
::;
,..J.'> Mer U'=.I::~
>-
Cc -
lJ f:r
01./; "'I Z
/"(: ~, ,
II ~ i :=.
+'~
@
Z
TH ST, w >-
<[ a::
I (L
<[
ST, f- I
0:: ,..:
<[ V)
ST, L
f- Z Z
(/) 1;/,
'.L oc V)
u w Z >-
0 f- W W
-.J Z ~ -.J
L I;/,tj 0 W
W w
I (/) Dc
I;/'..:J
L ST
~ 1;/, OAK
d f- f-
~ P1NE v' V)
co
I;/lLLA RD
f-
(/)
ABBOT ST, f- f- f-
(/) (/)
,..: (/)
(/) 1;/, CHU RCH lLL ST.
.s: ,...: 0
ANDER SON 'OT, +-' v) c:
" cu
<[ ~ '" 1;/ HA NeD CK ST E
I L
f- ex 0 .s: u
CL ex u r r 1 E
<[ <[ -' V) +- +- cYi
L I 0 o,f) +- oq-
I ([) vi
v> vi 1;/ MAP SH ST,
1 HUDSON ST,
vi Vl
1;/,
ORLEA'NS
/66'
,...:
(.~RETT ~ DR,
p ~
ED ex ex
.....\'1 ~/ l.J ex
~ C1, e ~
V) <"I 'i)\<' ,
L:1\-1h\<.\<.h..
<
-~~
g
<:
>,
-'
w
w
Cc
L.:J
32 :;3
S~-l;-~') I -'T I 6CJt;i j
, ~---1
I ~ I ,<[ 'I I
IlL: \W I LJ
I-'>~:> I
0<[0<[ "
~\
e
~SeH
WILDWOOD PINES 5TH ADD.
FILE NO.
STILL9511
DWG.NO.
1
ENGlNEERS.ARCHITECTSIIPLANNERS
e
WILDWOOD PINES
2ND ADDITION
~\)
'{-.\~ 'v~
~O\J\
~~
100 0
I I I
50
100
I
200
I
SCALE: 111= 100'
e
SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN
~SeJ
WILDWOOD PINES 5TH ADD. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
fU: NO.
STIlL9511
DAlE
4-27-95,
.
Ie
e
WILDWOOD PINES
2ND ADDITION
~\)
~~\..\..
~o'0\
43.5' R
~ ---------
100 0
I I \
50
100
I
200
I
SCALE: 1'= 100'
STREET & STORM SEWER
~""6eI-- W!!-D~gQD PINES 5JtL~Dg. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA
FUIlCl.
snLL9511
DAlE
4-27-95
e
,e
.
.
ME.M'ORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
v
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: COMMENTS ON NEW BRIDGE FINAL EIS
Attached are comments on the Final New Bridge EIS. The document is long and comments to
date have been many.
The bridge represents a solution to a regional transportation problem that is significantly
impacting local Stillwater traffic conditions. The City, in its Comprehensive Plan and
Downtown Plan, have studied traffic problems throughout the city and the only solution to many
of the problems is a better regional transportation system (a new bridge).
It is important that the EIS process proceed to completion so a record of decision can be
completed and the decision can proceed.
There may be challenges to the decision but based on the process followed and a review of the
EIS, the project will most likely proceed.
Recommendation:
Approve of response letter.
Attachment:
Draft Letter
~
r illYYater .
~ --~
--- ~~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
e
May 9, 1995
Mr. Mark Benson, P .E.
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge Building
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Re:Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for new St. Croix River Crossing.
Dear Mr, Benson:
The City of Stillwater has reviewed the FEIS for the new St. Croix River Crossing and offers the
following comments. The comments are listed by page as they appear in the FEIS text.
Page/Paragraph
Comment
pps 1-1, 1-18
-The Summary and purpose of the FEIS is written clearly - significant
impacts are listed in Table 1-1. Aesthetic, noise and wildlife impacts are
identified.
-Revised and new information has been included in the report to
more fully address the impact area and respond to comments on the
Draft EIS.
p.2-1, 2-17
-This section defines in detail the need for a new bridge. In addition to the
FEIS discussion the City of Stillwater is concerned about area-wide and
regional traffic that is significantly impacting local road conditions in the
City of Stillwater, Current traffic on CR5, Osgood, Greeley, Myrtle and
Third Streets are of concern and would be significantly reduced by the
bridge improvement. Access to the Downtown for residents and visitors
would also be improved with the construction of the bridge.
2-15
It is worth emphasizing the new bridge is consistent with the City of
Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Washington County Comprehensive Plan
and Regional Transportation plan. This is not a new project. It has been
in planning documents for many years.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
,
Mark Benson
Page 2
-
3-1
Many alternatives including no build and TSM improvements were
considered in detail. The City of Stillwater has studied TH 36 related
traffic problems for many years and a bridge is the only practical solution
to existing traffic conditions,
Other areas:
Bike Trails and Walkways - The final design for the bridge and roadway related improvements
should provide to the maximum extent for bikeway and walkways for access along the Highway
Corridor and connecting Oak Park Heights to Stillwater. A continuation of the S1.. Croix River
walkway /bikeway connecting Bayport and Stillwater should also be provided.
DNR Launch Ramp - The City of Stillwater supports the construction of a launch ramp at the
base of the bridge north of the NSP site as a possible project mitigation.
Existing Stillwater Lift Bridge - The City of Stillwater agrees with eliminating the existing
bridge from the new bridge decision, As detailed in the memorandum of agreement, the lift
bridge will be considered at a later date including section 106 review,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the FEIS. The City of Stillwater looks forward to
a final decision and completion of the new bridge in 2000.
Sincerely,
Jay L. Kimble
Mayor
e
MEMORANDUM
e
TO:
Mayor and City Council
K'/
FR:
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: REQUEST TO BUILD A HOUSE ON NORTH FIRST STREET
Discussion
Attached is a letter from Kevin LaCosse who is representing Stacey Jo Thompson, They are
requesting permission to construct a house along with well and septic on Lot 5, Blk 49 Carli and
Schulenberg's Addition, This lot is located off of North First Street between Willow Street and
Hazel Street. This request is a special case because there is no city sewer or water available nor
is this lot located on a city street. It borders First Street right of way but there is no street in
place. The city policy states that new homes must be built on a city street. In order to gain
access to this lot, an old driveway into this site would have to be utilized and improved.
If the city council chooses to allow this variance from past city policy, I would recommend it do
so subject to the following conditions:
1. The property owner should demonstrate to the city that the site is capable of supporting
an on-site septic system and meet all city requirements including approval by the building
inspector.
2, The property owner should submit a driveway plan and design for serving the lot which
meets the requirements set forth by the fire department (i.e., 12' wide minimum, 6"
gravel, 2" blacktop, 13' high clearance.
3. An agreement should be drafted by the city attorney and signed by the property owner
guaranteeing the property owner will not challenge the city on any street, sanitary sewer,
water or storm sewer assessments on future improvements to the area.
Recommendation
I recommend the city council consider the request and direct staff on the proper course of action.
If council decides to allow the variance from city policy, I recommend all conditions listed above
be required prior to issuance of a septic permit and building permit.
e,
f
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
"AIU(KI'T M, S'fACl<
STIl.I.WATER. MINN, SS()~Z
MINNt:so'rA RI~GlS1'E1Um
l.AN!} SURVF..VOR
Tel. No. 439-S630
Jon NO: None
e
: SLlRVE" MADEF-XCI.USIVEL,\' FOR: Mr. Kenneth SeefQrt. Crolxland Excavating,
10003 N. M~ndel Rd.. Stillwater. MN 55002
DESCRIPTION: As described on Ooc. Nos. 399058. 399059 and 399060 I
.J
~
~
.._,
"
~
\\\
\~
~.~
~
tt)
\~~.
'::\ (
,.~ ,~
,
~
/I/r,
........-.......-_.... ..-...-,,~...
t (,
Office
N01-E~ :
of the County Recorder. Wash. Co.. Minnesota.
Ori~ntation of this bearing system is assumed.
o Indicates iron pipe monument 'inplace marked
6 with a plastic plug inscribed RLS 13774.
! "M." Indicates
measured value.
11 R . \I 1 n d i cat e s
record value.
Note description gell
as shown hereon.
Bit. Pavt. and dri\'e~
way locations shown
are approx.
Undergrouno or cver~
head private of pub.
util. on or adjacent
the site ~ere not
loco In the course
of this survey,
Carli and Schule~
burg I s Add. is
recorded as Ooc.
No. 416049, Wash.
Co. Records.
-.
N. /l-fl, 9~
e./$'O
I
.It. .,.,
.
~
".
....
~~
.~
\~
"'~
, ~ \
r....
1\1
--.\..-.--
~~
->-'"
()~
~
,,~
~-
~i J.
~ ~ ~ />"c. IV". Jj'P()f),/ 1
~\l I'.t 5~. it7 FEc?'
~ _._--~--~
........ ---................--
,..~"t,.J
(.. ,i ,...
=.-- --
"7
~ I 'J ~JrtLl
~ (N/.
,'\ I ,tv ;., ,-" , A -
~ :")c" .,-
~
;;-
i~ ~~~
~ t
~ 3
a-.
tl\
fj
~
I fJp'
JI jI
,
~. AI" ,;f'I~t.tJ
\
,~
~,/ft'
_ .v&J?";!d 'st8"'& 1'1./(I-?,93
"- r -- ----..... ....... ..- --""_... ..... .
WIJ.J.()W
r' <1 !il) t
---------.
-
---...--.. .....
Sr:
hv~
~
.---.---. ......-..----.- ~
"..---.---- ........ .
\--
-........-..-..--
----I~l)y ~t;;t~y~-h~.;-;his survey. plan. or report was
prepared by ll\e or und(( my direct supcrvi~ion uno thu
1 am a dut~ Registered Land Surveyor under the b.w~ uf
the State of Minnesotll,
..~df.f,.~.............
l>atc...J.U-\ Y... 2.L... Ui.9J... ,.. Reg.No.....\ .3,Z.7A...... .......,
,
.-'"
e
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FR:
Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
~t-ff /'
DA: May 11, 1995
RE: L.I. 312 - 1995 STREET PROJECT BID AWARD
Bids will be opened for the 1995 Street Project. Additional information will be available at
meeting time.
JV~,8.y ~I, :i~I'.!J':')
Mr. Klayton Eckles, P.E.
~ity Engineer
~ity of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater. MN 5~082
Dear Klayton:
Per our meeting of may 4, 1995, I am \\'thing on behalf of Stacy Jo Thompson to request your
consideration regarding the issuance of several permits. Ms, Thonlpson is inlerested in
constructing a single family home on Lot 5, as shown on the attached Certificate of Survey,
As discussed, permits for building, septic and private driveway on public right of way would be
required, Based on the conditions which we discusfled, you indicated that these items appeared
to be accompUshable.
Klayton, if you need any information beyond what I provided yesterday, plea.se do not he5itate
to call me at 929-2294-, I appree1Me your time and consideration in this matter, and look forward
to working with yoU further.
.inc,erety)
~
Kevin J. LaCasse
\df
.
.
I
i - - - - - - - - - ,",:- - - - - - - - - - -.~ - - - - - - - - - - 1::: :- - - - - "'~:-.,.- ,-----0- - - ~ -0".- - -.. -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -. - - - -. .. _.'
.
I
-~."..
~~~
e- w~,
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL. MN 55110 612490.2000 800 325-2055
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMeNTAL TRANSPORTATION
May 16/1995
RE: Stillwaterl Minnesota
1995 Street Improvements
L.I, 312
SEH No. A.STILL9506.01
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City ot Stillwater
ATTN: Klayton Eckles
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
On Monday, May 15, 1995, four bids were received for the 1995 Street Improvements in Stillwater.
These improvements include the reconstruction of streets in the Croixwood area of Stillwater. The
project is set up with a Base Bid, which includes the reconstruction of all streets. An Alternate Bid
11 A" was included to provide for patching, crack filling, cold recycling and overlaying on Sunrise
Avenue. A summary of the bids is as follows:
Base Add
Bid Alternate A Total
. 1. Tower Construction $554,577.10 ($20,740.00) $533,837,10
2. Valley Paving, Inc. 639,250.92 (51,159.75) 588,091.17
3, Master Asphalt Co. 636,894.80 (39,987.75) 596,907.05
4. Hardrives, Inc. 657,258.35 (45,090.75) 612,167.60
Engineer's Estimate $683,214.25 ($67,628,75) $615,585.50
The low bid was submitted by Tower Asphalt of Lakeland, Minnesota. We have had good
experience with Tower Asphalt in the City of Stillwater and believe that they have the experience
and financial ability to complete a project of this size. Substantial completion is set for
August 28, 1995 and final completion by September 11; 1995.
The engineer's estimate was $683,215. The feasibility study estimate was $598,795 construction cost
with a 10% contingency. The feasibility cost did not include cold recycling. We recommend
constructing the base bid because we feel the City will receive a better product in the long run and
will better suit the needs of the City, We would, therefore, recommend award of this contract to
Tower Asphalt, in the amount of $554,577.10 for the Base Bid.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, ,n j-
-G~ c . f ~
Barry C. Peters, P.E.
. tlo
SHORT EWOTT
HENDRIC.I.(SON INC
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
sr CLOlJO, MN
CHIPPcW.l :ALLS, WI
MADISON, WI
LAKE COUNTY, IN
EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLoyer,'
RESOLUTION NO, 95-122
ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
1995 STREET PROJECTS, L.1. 312
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of 1995 Street
Projects, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and bids were received
complying with the advertisement;
AND, WHEREAS, it appears that Tower Asphalt, Inc., of Lakeland, Minnesota, is the lowest
responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
Tower Asphalt, Inc., of Lakeland, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Stillwater for
the construction of 1995 Street Projects according to the plans and specifications
therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2,
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the
next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of May, 1995.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
.'
MAY:15-95 MON9:44
"- . .. ..
CITY OF STILLWATER
FAX NO. 61243804~o
r. LJ.1
MAY 15 '95 09:33AM
..
e
APPUCATION FOR MOTION PICTURE PRODUCTION PERMIT
Applicant:
Name of Company: 7c.\. -tc- "-12-+\ toL..O"L....c:<<\~Y\. ~ A \-.e--c +(.~~ V"\ rI\~ '^ \-
Address of Company. l '6 '1 0 0 icl \~ vl s C~"\ ~~. S ~ - ~o... v... \ S- ~- I l cl
City State Zip Code
Telephone Number ((0 l d-) 1.3 D - 1/ 7 .,
Person Authorized to Receive Service of Process by Mail:
Name ~66 ~'\e...j. ( .ro_C-\-
Address \ JJ w _ \~ ,:... ~ b.t- - S ~. 0CL'-".l
Telephone Number (lR I ~ ) {P d- l - 0 lP L/ S- '
SS- I D 1
State locations of Production:
CD M(~'i\ <;)h Sh\ \ We- tL\
--7 m~,,'\ S"4- _ ~cv...R C-c\Y\
o ~ ~ ~ -\- t\ \Jo.. ~ <;\-.
(3) 'f- ,{' s k (" ~ CUV\.. \.::.
c'Ndv'\.\A.\-
~-\-~Y\
'I~ \-
p c. d-
"\ 1'-~
0- - 4-
A
I .1 'I
U"ITOrlO..s
M.c..,~ s+,
Estimated Start Date of Production s-I d-d- J q r
Estimated Duration of Production l ., h r oS (p :.. () /) ~ - B: Dc) ~
Brlefty Describe Type of Production Wise. (Y\o--L.. ~ r
,
~ O./V\. \:.- ~ \:, ~ I 12iL \J 0 l v... .-\-, C 0 G\. f re s a.:{Q...
~ ~ \?> T . '0<1 ~ e..J O~'" tL +1" WL S \-0 ,r ,,/
TJ m ~.J\f.
~e-~ s "'-L d. b,
Anticipated Use 01 City ResourcesIWork force
-. .~~~ ~\l\ ~'til a-<-\tl.:\.J M.Q...lJ ~(l'~' -\i-o..('~\~
Q.~~\-.rC'\. 1:$ \4- ~c~s,b\.p \-v c:.o{\.-\.ro\ ~t-c\l I~l~s",
MAY-l~-95 MON 9:44
C llY Of Sll LLWA Il:.l<
thX NU. bl~qj~Uq~b
r. lJ4
MAY 15 '95 09:33AM
Briefly Describe Anticipated Closures of City Streets (Including time of day/duration):
(I \ \' r I ' t
,/0 (A C l~ S+i\ ""\-- S Co ~\, -VL +--U \) ~ che ( t1) .s ,
e
o
{Y\a.. ~'^
S-\-o
3: <\ \e -( fi\-\ \\-e.. '^~ -\--{ (\..u ~ L L tl r, \.r C \
~(c.n -, ~ Do OJYy\ - \.j Dt'l (\ ,
5-/ d-Z) J qS-
1?J ~~ d-(\.v-- ~ ~\- -Ci-~ M
T- Ii'- it" \~" l tt-t' ~'\. \
k-,ci'l\ ~; 00 r-
(J- ~~ So\-.
+<fo.~~ c..
-\-0 p(\~ \ fI St-.
e(!I\\.r~ 1 )" I,~;r I qJ
3 '~ c) 0
fvY\
NOTE TO APPLICANT;
This application (including proof of insurance) must be filed not more than 180 days before and not
less than 5 days before commencement of production.
A performance bond may be required with this permit. The performance bond amount will be
determined based on the applicants use/modification/conversion of public and/or private property.
Further, the applicant, by executing this application hereby agrees to reimburse the City for any
extraordinary expenses rendered in connection with the production in a timely manner. Such costs
shall include, but not limited to, charges for personnel and equipment committed in support of the
production which are outside the normal scope of government services. Based on the information
contained in the permit application, an estimate of these costs will be provided to the applicant prior
to issuance of the permit. The City may require prepayment of all or a portion of these estimated
costs prior to issuance of the permit. At the conclusion of the production an itemized bill will be
provided to applicant and actual costs below or in excess of the estimates will be refunded by the
City or paid by the applicant, respectively. The City is under no obligation to provide City personnel
or equipment, and such shall be provided only if the City Council approves.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: ~ jJ - !'1'!e9 ~ -
(II
The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this ---LL day of Aj,/f,Y
19 9's. by ~A&T, ~ JEn{.,(>~ts M /<1:1/'///1/, <f1 ,,~ . on behalf of
LJ-r;. // (Na'Jl~ (Title) BARBARA A. FERROZZO
~7r,~/7If1 A/",t/ NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
(CO pany N~ae )) RAM~EY COUNTY
m ~k ?f". ""OM" ''''''''' ""'''"'"
Approved by:
City Coordinator ,- and/or
City Council
'-1
Date approved:
;~;;;:F; ,
ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
5/!5/l995
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO
RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND
OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, .
RHH I ALBERT G. RUBEN
INSURANCE SERVICES INC.
48 WEST 25TH STREET, 12TH FL.
NEW YORK, NY 10010.2703
,PHONE: (212) 627-7400
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
GULF INSURANCE
COMPANY A
LETTER
COMPANY B
LETTER
COMPANY C
LETTER
COMPANY D
LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
CHUBB
GENERAL STAR NATIONAL
INSURED
PATCHETT KAUFHAN ENTERTAINMENT
5621 HAYDEN FLACE
CULVER CITY, CA 90232
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE
ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BYTHE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECTTO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH
POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS,
CO
LTR
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY)
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
GENERAL LIABILITY
A A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE ~ iioCCUR.
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT,
GENERAL AGGREGATE
02/ 16; 96 PRODUCTS-COMP lOP AGG,
PERSONAL & ADV, INJURYS
EACH OCCURRENCE
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire)
MED, EXPENSE (Anyone Person)
CLP 769 15 61
02/16/95
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
A ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS
X NON-OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE
02/16/96 LIMIT
CLP 769 15 61
02/15/95
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE
EXCESS LIABILITY
E A UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
EACH OCCURRENCE
02/15/96 AGGREGATE
NUG 320 58 5A
02/15/95
A
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
STATUTORY LIMITS
02/15/95 EACH ACCIDENT
DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT
DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE
WC 565 80 72
02/16/95
OTHER
c
DICE PRODUCERS
PACKAGE POLICY
794~)7887
02/16/95
02/15/96 ~2,000,000 MISC
EQUIP./REPL.C05T
DUCRIPTIONOFOPERATlONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLES/SPECIALITEMS CERTIFICATE HOLDER INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL
INSURED MANAGERS OR LESSORS ur PREMISES BUT ONLY AS RESPECTS THE SOLE
NEGLIGENCE OF THE NAMED INSURED.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
LIMITS
$2,000,000
51,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$ 50,000
s 5,000
$
1,000,000
s
$
$
$5,000,000
s5,000,000
s1, 000, 000
s1, 000, o ,iJ iZ,
s1, 000, 00LZ:
CITY OF STILLWATER
6 N. . 4TH ST.
TILLWATER, MN 55082
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATLON DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
MAIL ~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO T!iE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY
KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES,
ATTENTION: NILE KRIESEL
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ./- ~A' II f\
<-J 6" 0'\, {,.{J~
ACORD 25-S (7/90)
1-.*141C"
o ACORD CORPORATION 1990
~ ~~~~?t~~~~~n~~~:~
-
May S, 1995
TO: Metropolitan Area Legislators and Local Governing Bodies Having Jurisdictions
Within IVletropolitan Council Districts 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16
Tht M~:ropolitaI: Council i;. tb app()in~il~g ai.1l!1ority fCI!' rn.::rr,ters of the !v!etropolitan rad:') UflU
Open Space Commission, Currently four seats on the Commission have tt~lm<; that have expired,
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473 303, Subd, 2(0) we are notifying "in writing the governing
bodies of the statutory and home rule charter cities, counties and towns having territory in the
districts for which members are to be appointed" that the Council's Appointments Commi!~ee will
hold a public meeting to hear from candidates and others who wish to speak on their behaif. Thi~
meeting will afford each \:andidate the opportunity to present information about th,~ir background
and experience in public policy issues, with particular emphasis on any expertise or special interest
they may have in the commission's area of endeavor. In making its recommendations, tbe
committee wili also consider evidence of the candidate's commitment to c0i11municate regularly
on issues btfore the commission with Council members, legislators and local elected ofricial~ in
their district.
The public meeting will be beld on Thursday, June 1, 1995, at 7 p,m, in the Nletropolitan Council
Chambers, Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul. This location was selected because
it is centrally located amidst the districts that candidates must reside within, This date was
selected because it follows the legislature's adjournment, thus enabling legislators to participate,
and also permits additional holiday leave, if desired, for the Memorial Day weekend,
If you have any questions regarding the appointment process or wish to fOI'\N2.rd letters of s~ppor.
or nominations in writing, feel free to contact me at the address below or by caliing 291-6390,
Sincerely,
Sandi Lindstrom
Chair's Ofiice
Ie
230 East Fifth Street St, Paul. Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax: 291-6550 TOO/TIT 291-0904 Metro Info Une 229-3780
An Equal Opportunity Employer
e
e
.
~ay 16, 1995
City Administrator/
Stillwater City Council
216 N 4th St.
Stillwater, Mn, 55082
Dear Members of the Council:
As Chairman of the Stillwater Memorial Day Association I wish to
inform you that it is our intentions to have our annual Memorial
Day Program on Monday, May 29, 1995 at Lowell Park - 11:00 A.M.
Prior to the start of the program we will have a short parade from
the Family Services parking lot (just So, of City Hall) down to
Lowell Park, It is our hope that we can get the Police Dept to
help us with traffic control during the short march to the park.
This shouldn't take over 15 minutes, We would also like to request
that members of the City Park staff make sure that the park is as
clean as possible prior to our program. Lastly, we would
appreciate it if the U.S. flag is up and flying at half-mast that
whole day.
We will do our best to keep the channels of communication open
between you and the members of our Association. Good communication
and. cooperation should help assure that we continue the fine
tradition of honoring the veterans who served our country and have
now passed away,
Each and everyone of you are invi ted to at tend this community
program.
Respectfully,
ro~ \). ~~
Jon D, Larson
Chrmn. Stillwater Memorial Day Ass~tion
Stillwater American Legion, VFW D.~,I2 Auxiliaries
:e
I
'e
I,
", ~reade*
~ mail survey research
.
.'
,.
.- .'
.,
" :'May 11~1995
.J~y Kimble
, Stillwater City Council
, City pfStiIlwater
216N. 4th Street
, : Stillwater" MN, 55082 '
"
, .
, . pear Mr. M;tyor and Council Members: "., .
.. " -.,' -.
,..,'
'We would like to'cordlcllly irivi~eyoutoattenda 'ground breaking' ceremony for 'tteaciex'~
, new'buildingat 225'l~"yer Drive., ,'n:1~' ~vellt\Vill ~ke place onThu~day, May'18th 'at
4:~Opm, ", " ' ' , ,
. ., . . "'. . . , . ..
Act1,lal wo~1\ on our project begc;l~last.Friday. We are Very excitedabout the project and '
,w~ntto,'thank you for the,hetp ygu have,given us through theW process. " '
.. .... ,'-" '.: '-' --', " ",' -,' ". . '. ' '. " .
, Hope to s~ej'ou ne~Thurs~y. ,:'
....
, Sin~rely, ,
~~ ' .
, '
.c1~
Jack Semler '
'~..",~
Kelly,semler '
."
. '
140 QUAIL STREET
, ST, PAUL, MN 55U5,'
6"12/426,3,221
FAX 612/42638,00
e
,1IJ~1Se71
~)
~
F .~ r;J
~." ".'.
[, I L
Ii4d ...\"
ANDERSEN WINDOWS, INC,
May 9,1995
Stillwater City Council
Attn: Morli Weldon
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Ms. Weldon:
This is to inform the City Council of Stillwater that the Andersen WindowCare
Service Center located at 2001 Washington Avenue, Stillwater, MN, is planning a
one day "Grand Opening" event.
Invited guests will be Andersen employees and their families that work in the
building, in addition to some of our neighboring businesses. We will be holding
this event on Saturday, June 17 from noon until 5:00 p.m. Plans include putting up
a tent in the front parking lot where there will be food, refreshments (non-
alcoholic), and carnival type booths.
Please let me know if there is anything we need to do prior to this event. I can be
reached by phone at 430-5469.
Thank you for your time in this matter.
Sincerely,
ANDERSEN WINDOWS, INC.
~.V-~
Sue Belisle
Technical Communication Coordinator
e
100 FOURTH AVENUE NORTH BAYPORT, MINNESOTA 55003-1096 612-439-5150
J1l.naersen WinaowCare Service Center
. a.( 1300tfls
ca.111-1,1)
pfease join us
unier tlie iBig 'Tent
for our (jrana Opening
r:Bingo
T
";,.;
e
'ffiZeS
ipOOr
1)'U-rBers
mate:
Time:
Location:
June 17/ 1995
12 /Won - 5:00 p.m.
2001 Washington J4.ve.
Sti[[water/ M9{ 55082
.:JfOur& 7;
.J OUrs
2(~~tf7h~
., ~Jzts
1'1'a.t5
2?:s.o/.P. 6y May 19/ 1995
:Jfot !Dogs
-.~..---_ _"_-_-_._ _-_-_ ~__,r-_I'!l_-.-.-.-_- -.""'..."":...O::u- ~__~.-,-.t::__~ ':':" -_-_.~,..":'_'"":~- -~:"~..~_.::_.::......::.-=-:.-=.:-__.- ~- - =."'___'.".__
J1l.naersen WinaowCare Service Center
grana Opening
9{umoer of passes neeaea (up to 6)..
Wirr not 6e a6re to attena.
Signature
p{ease return to !1{fwnaa rrfioael SerVice 'lJepartmentl 6g !Friaagl !Mag 191
in tlie enclosea enveCope.
e
e
CJ-f5ztXT1:'R 'COMMISSION
City of StiCCwater
May 1, 1995
Mayor Jay Kimble and Members of the City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mayor Kimble and Councilmen:
The Charter Commission is currently reviewing city boards and commissions and the
charter provisions which govern them. In reviewing old minutes, we noted that
previous Committees reviewed the water board and that they were provided with
pertinent information from both the water department and city hall. Our group would
also like to look at the water department, its advantages and disadvantagesf and to that
end, we are requesting any previous or new information you may care to share with
us.
Dennis McKean and Jack Jewell attended our April meeting, and we would like to
extend a similar invitation to you or your representative to come to our regular
monthly meeting at 7 p.m. on June 19th.
Printed materials can be sent to me at 3018 Marine Circle or you may reach me during
the day at 439-3838.
Yours truly,
kd(p(~<-)J~
Laurie Maher
Chair
e
.... ('.
Business Agenda
1.
Call to order.
e
2. Welcome. (Minneapolis Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton)
3. Recognition of Retiring Officers and Board Directors.
4. Metropolitan Council Update. (Regional Administrator Jim Solem)
5. Presentation of Awards. (Susan Hoyt & Kirk Schnitker)
a. Innovative City Award
b. Peacemaker Award
6. Annual Election of Officers and Directors.
a. Report of Nominating Committee. (Chair Dave Childs) (enclosed)
b. Election of President, Vice President and Directors.
7. Comments by, President. (Joan Campbell)
8. Other Business.
9. Announcements.
10. Adjournment.
Directions
~ 'oumlOAll[ZatAII
SHOREVIEW ..
LOke
Vadnols
" [
Ge"'~i),[J' [
Lote~
Jax Cafe
1928 University Ave. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
(612) 789-7297
From South:
35W North to University/4th 51. exit, left on 4th, then
left on 1 st Ave. No., then right on University NE and
go to 20th and University.
From North:
694 to University exit, go South about 3 1/2 miles to
20th and University.
From West:
394 follow downtown exits and turn left on Washing-
ton, go 1 mile and turn right on Broadway, go
across the river to third stoplight, left onto University
Ave. NE and go 9 blocks to 20th.
From East:
94 West to 280 North to Broadway, left onto Broad-
way go 3 miles to University Ave, NE, turn right onto
University and go 9 blocks to 20th.
e
W ASIllNGTON COUNTY
Dennie C. Hegberg
Dletrlct 1
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
MAY 16, 1995, 2:00 A.M.
Mery Heuee,
Dletrlct 2
Welly Abrehemeon
Dletrlct3/Chelnnen
Myre Petereon
Dletrlct 4
Deve Engetrom
DI.trlct 6
ROLL CALL
CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC HEARING - COUNTY ATTORNEY - R. ARNEY, COUNTY ATTORNEY
JUVENILE CURFEW ORDINANCE
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT - D. PAPIN, DIRECTOR
FAMILY HOMELESS PREVENTION AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - D. WISNIEWSKI, DIRECTOR
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS ON TH 36 AT CSAH 36 AND 15
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - V. ERDAHL, DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR
A. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AWARD FOR 1994 - S. NEUBAUER
B. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - SUSAN LADWIG
7. 10:55 DISCUSSION FROM THE AUDIENCE
1. 9:00
2.
3. 9:00
4. 9:45
5. 10:00
6. 10:20
8.
9.
10.
11.
11:05
11:15
TO
12:15
VISITORS A<<Y SIWlE 1llEIR CONCERNS wrm 77lE COUNTY BOARD OF COMM/SSJONERS ON ANY TTEM NOT ON 77lE AGENDA. 77lE CHA1R W1lL DIRECT 77lE
COUNTY ADMINlSIRATOR TO P1tEPARE RESPONSE3 TO YOUR CONCERNS. YOU ARE ENCOURAGED NOT TO BE REPETTIlOUS OF PREVIOUS SPEAKERS AND TO
UMlT YOUR ADDRESS TO FIVE M/NUTFS.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS - COMKENTS - QUESTIONS
71US PERIOD OF 11ME SHAlL BE USED BY 77lE COMMISSIONERS TO REPOKT TO 77lE FUlL BOARD ON COMMtITEE AC'/7V111F.S. MAKE COMMENTS ON A<< TIERS
OF INTEREST AND INFORMATION, OR 1WSE QUESTIONS TO 77lE STAFF. 11IJS AC110N IS NOT INTENDED TO RESULT IN SUBSTANTIVE BOARD AC110N DURING
71US 11ME. ANY AC110N NECESSARY BECAUSE OF DISCUSSION W1lL BE SCHEDULED FOR A FU1URE BOARD MEEIlNG.
BOARD CORRESPONDENCE
ADJOURN
BOARD WORKSHOP WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ROOM B
UPDATE ON PARK PROJECTS AT BIG MARINE PARK RESERVE;
COTTAGE GROVE RAVINE REGIONAL PARK; AND, GREY CLOUD
ISLAND REGIONAL PARK
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
REMINDER: Ho Board Meeting on May 30, 1995 - 5th ~esday
Date
May 16
May 16
May 17
May 17
May 17
May 17
May 18
May 18
May 18
May 19
MEE'.rIHG HO'.rICES
Committee
Mental Health Advisory
Public Health Advisory
Plat Commission
Legal Assistance
Transportation Advisory
HRA Board
KELSAjMetronet
Minnesota Extension Services
Park and Open Space Commission
Planning Advisory Commission
'.riae
4:00 p.m.
5:30 p.m.
9:30 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
2:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
12:00 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
7;00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Location
Oakdale City Offices
Washington County Government Center
Washington County Government Center
Stillwater Perkins
230 E. 5th St.-Mears Park Centre
321 Broadway - st. Paul Park
226 Metro square Bldg. - st. Paul
Extension Offices - Rooms A & B
Washington County Government Center
Washington county Government Center
If you need .ai_nee due to djability or __~ betrier, pIee_ ceI1 430-6003 fTDD 439-32201
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR **
MAY 16, 1995
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
e
DEPAR'rMENTI AGEHCY
ADMINISTRATION
1':rEM
HUMAN RESOURCES
A. APPROVAL OF THE MAY 2, 1995 BOARD MEETING MINUTES
B. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE COMMUNITY SERVICES AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
ENVIRONMENT. AND LAND MANAGEMENT.
C. APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE ACT GRANT FOR
WASHINGTON COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION TEAM IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,000.
D. APPROVAL OF BANDING AND GRADING OF THE NEW JOB DESCRIPTION
OF ECONOMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM SPECIALIST IN COMMUNITY SERVICES
AT B25-1; APPROVAL OF JOB DESCRIPTION.
E. APPROVAL OF BANDING AND GRADING OF THE NEW JOB DESCRIPTION
OF BUYER/COORDINATOR IN THE CENTRAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT
B24-1; APPROVAL OF JOB DESCRIPTION.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS
F. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION, FINAL PAYMENT TO GEORGE SIEGFRIED
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,630 FOR REMODELING
OF SPACE USED FOR COTTAGE GROVE COURTS.
G. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION TO ENTER INTO ROAD CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT NO. 73315 WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS ON TH 36 AT THE
INTERSECTION OF CSAH 15 AND CSAH 36.
H. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
FOR COUNTY ROAD SA IN THE CITY OF HUGO.
RECORDER
I. INFORMATION ONLY - RECORDER FEES FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL,
1995.
SHERIFF
J. APPROVAL TO RATIFY CONTRACT WITH, TIM'S TOWER SERVICE AND
AUTHORIZE PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,115.
e
~OIISeIIt Calendar items arc gcnenJly defmcd u items of routine buaineas, not requiring discussion, IUd approved in one vOle. Commissionen may elect to pull a Consent
Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or aeparatc actioo.
0~i/08/95
11: 10
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 346
~01
e
A.GENIlA
CITY OF OAK PARX EElGE'I'S
MONDAY, MAY S, 1995 .- 7:00 P.M.
7 :' 0 0 AGEND~.
I. ~9-. 11 To Order
II. Visitor Commen~s. Oue~tionsJ ~r Concerns
1. Dave Eckberg - Request for Funding for Lumberjack
Days
Enclcsu::e 1
.
'.
2. Tom Porter - Nuisance Code Enforcement
III.
peoa~t~~~t Repo~ts
1. police 3. Euildin~
2. utilities 4. Parks -
5. Administration
6. Cable
IV.
91.d EU$i~ess;
1. Preliminary Report
Ridae Addition
Enoiosure 2
Utility Improvements - Autumn
2. Brackey Addition - Request for Final Plat Approval
Enclosure 3
3. Update on Menards
4. Update on Applebees
5. Update on Trail committee
6. Update on Design Review committee
V." E~v; ew Mi1'}.utes - ~_pril 24. '1995-
EnclosU%:'e 4
,2cview Mi~utes -L~ay 1. 1995
Bnclos\U:e 5
VI. Fublic ~earinis
1. Request for Variance to Encroach 4 feet into the
Side Yard Setback . Robert & Donna Bement - 142S0
oldfield Court
Enclosure 6
e
2. Request for Kennel License - Mike M Mary Kay
Moller - 14316 Upper 56th St~eet
Enc::losure 7
Post.i~ Fax Note
ITO ,.
Co pI.
I '
PhOne U
135/138/95
11: 113
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 4 61243913456
NO. 346
VII. NAW ~us4~e~5
1. Easles Club - Request for Permit to Eold a Street
Dance - Lumberjack Days
VIII.
IX.
2. Resolution 95-05-24 - A Resolution Approving a
Gamblinc Premiees Permit for Eagles Aerie 94 Stillwater
EnclQs".:.e e
3. Or~inance No. 95-1001-02 - An Ordinance Amending
Chapte~ 1001 of the Code of Ordinances Qf the City Qf
Oak Pa=k Heights to Add Section 1001.215 Affecting
Co~~~ec~ion to City Storm Water Systems, Sump Pum~s, and
connections to Sanitary Sewer Systems y"'
Enclcsu::,e 9
4. A~==oval of Area A Street Reconstruction Bid
tnclosu=e 10, lOA << 102
S. S~illwater Area Chambe= of Commerce - Funding
Request
Enclosl:.=e 11
6. Proposed St. Croix River Bridge EIS
Pay 'B'i 1 la
Corri!;~~~:p.ce
1. Stillwater Area Schools - Bond Election H~urs
Enclosu=. 12
2. Vision Committee Meeting Minutes
E:c.c:losu=e 13
.,'
3. Letter from SFI Waste Systems
Enclosure 14
4. Asenda - Special Joint council Meeting with
Stillwater City Council - May 9, 1995
.Enc:::losu=e 15
(;1132
e
e
e
e
Chair:
Aaenda:
Minutes:
Treasurer:
Attornev:
Planner:
Enaineer:
Public Works:
Clerk:
Committees:
PeoDle - 8:30 PM
Old Business:
New ~usiness:
Note:
Stillwater Township
May 11, 1995
Johnson
7:00 p.m. Fundingsland Variance Hearing
7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
adopt
approve minutes - April 27, 1995
1. Checks/claims
1. Wahlin Grading Permit
1. Asphalt Program
1. Oak Witt Grant Information
2. Long Range Planning
CLAIMS PLEASE
May 5. 1995
Pat Bantli
ilrnP~t
e FURNITURE AND CARPET COMPANY
SINCE 1864
301 South Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 439-2110 FAX (612) 439-2112
t'lay 15,1995
City of Stillwater
Dear Mayor, Council and Staff:
You are all invited to attend our official ground breaking
ceremony on May 31st, 1995, at 8:00 AM..
We look forward to your attendance.
T FURNITURE & CARPET CO.
JOB/sf
e
...
--I
...
'" Ilm
'..1 V~"'lI;
;] ~~f~,
4 ~f~
L t I F B, S, T y t E
.... 0. 7 -.
e-
e,
tl
Phoenix sprawls into the desert at the rate of an acre an hour. Greater
e of crilne have wrecked the tranquil 'burbs of Ozzie and Harriet's time.
40 :-; E \\' S \\' I'~ E K ~I A Y I;). 1 995
~ ~
~. ~ t ~':: I
i S;~ ~!'~f. ~.~
, ! ., I __.. ;,;:,:1-
t.--... ~f' . -........., ~ ~
Ala ...
'" -.. I' ,-~. 1;'"
", "' '11' "
~::: '~.:-~;t!'tm!.j I~ W~i
IHn;U\l'I/."f1fnl"IIII11/:\ln 11'1,
ur
an
ream
~~ York City stretches clear into Pennsylvania. Strip malls, traffic, fear
Io~ can we bring civility back to suburban life? By JERRY ADLER
~l ,\ r l;j, I 9 n ;j N E \\' S \\' F F K 41
I' ,
I
Pave
LIFESTYLE
Para
e.
lse
The 'new urbanists' are going back to the future to take the edge off edge cities.
They want to bring small-town charm to blighted metropolitan landscapes.
e
VIEWED FROM THE AIR, THERE'S NO APPARENT REASON
why a city like Phoenix, Ariz., already the seventh largest
in the nation. couldn't keep growing forever. Four times a
year, a pilot from Landiscor, an aerial-surveying company,
flies over the city at 20,000 feet, snapping pictures to be
assembled into vast photographic maps. They show the white
boxes of downtown, the graceful loop of the freeways as they
intersect and sort themselves out by compass point, and the gleam-
ing roofs of suburbia stretching to the horizon in nested curves of
roads. streets, drives and lanes. The pictures from the end of March
show 5.000 more houses than the ones taken three months earlier.
Houses squeeze through the gap between two Indian reservations
and follow the highways into the desert, which they are consuming
at an acre an hour. Excluding federal land, the only thing standing
in the way of Phoenix's swallowing the rest of the state, says
42 NEW S WEE K MAY I 5, I 9 9 5
JOHN IIUMIlLE
Porches, gables and picket fences-all brand new at Kentlands
WONDERFUL TOWN
Some people consider such communities
too cute, but cuteness is the glue that holds
them together at five units an acre
Michael Fifield, director of the Joint Urban Design Program of
Arizona State University, is Tucson.
Unless, that is, you subscribe to the view of former mayor Terry
Goddard. that Phoenix is approaching the marginal disutility of
suburban sprawl. This is the point at which each new subdivision
subtracts more from the quality
of life than the new inhabitants
will contribute to the economy
'buying wind chimes, mes-
e logs and Navajo-motif
t row rugs. Many other places
in the country are coming round
to this view. Most suburbs are
exploding in size without even
the compensation of economic
growth; the Cleveland metro-
polit~ area expanded by a third
between 1970 and 1990 even as
its population declined. Over
roughly the same period, Cali-
fornia's population increased
by 40 percent while the total
of vehicle-miles driven doubled.
Maintaining a fleet of cars
to navigate among the housing
tracts, commercial strips and of-
fice complexes of the American
landscape now takes 18 percent
of the average family budget.
As anyone who reads the fic-
tion in The New Yorker knows, Americans mostly live in banal
places with the souls of shopping malls, affording nowhere to
mingle except traffic jams, nowhere to walk except in the health
club. By itself, this hasn't been a reason to stop building suburbs,
But economic unsustainability may carry more weight. A confer-
ence on. '~ternatives to Sprawl" at the Brookings Institution this
year ~as electrified by a report from the Bank of America endors-
ing th'~ formerly elitist view that sprawl in California has created
"enormous social, environmental and economic costs, which until
now h~v,e been hidden, ignored, or quietly borne by society . . .
Busin~sses suffer from higher costs, a loss in worker productivity,
and linderutilized investments in older communities," "You can't
keep spreading out," says Mike Burton, executive director of Port-
land, Ore.'s metropolitan government, Metro. "The cost to make
roads and sewers gets to the point where it doesn't work."
THE CHALLENGE IS TO DEVISE AN ALTERNATIVE TO SPRAWL,
where people can envision their children playing in the
streets. It must not evoke "the city," an alien place where
by definition middle-class Americans refuse to live. So a
growing corps of visionaries, of which the best-known are
Miami-based architects Andres Duany and his wife and partner,
Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, are looking to an even older model-the
"village," defined as a cluster of houses around a central place that
is the focus of civic life. Under the banner of "new urbanism." they
have promulgated some surprisingly simple and obvious rules for
building better suburbs, described in detail on the following pages.
They can be roughly summarized in these three principles:
. Density: A typical modern suburb may have one to two dwell-
ing units per acre, and is laid out entirely for the convenience of the
automobile, The new urbanism strives for five or six units per acre,
including a mix of housing types: detached houses, row houses,
apartments, "granny flats" tucked away above the garages. In
theory-and the new urbanism still exists mostly in theory-the
village would extend no more than a quarter-mile from the center
to the edge and include a transit stop and a place to buy a quart of
milk and a newspaper (actually, probably, a decaf latte and a copy
of The Kenyon Review, but the point is the same).
. Civic space: Suburbs-except for the streets-consist of almost
Ausively private space, much of it devoted to the single most
_ess form of plant life in all botany, the ornamental lawn. A
suburb is a place that's two-thirds grass but with nowhere for kids
JOHN HUMBLE
Kids waiting to cross a multilane road in Temecula, Calif
No STREET OF DREAMS
The 'civic center' of many suburbs,
designed for the convenience of the car, is
a strip mall along a six-lane highway
to play ball, except in the streets. Communities need parks and
outdoor public spaces in which people can gather and interact.
. Mandatory design codes: Obviously, no one with a choice in the
matter would want to look out his window at a 7-Eleven. New
urbanist practitioners impose elaborate design and zoning controls
intended to create harmonious streetscapes. The results can be
intensively cute and not to the taste of people unaccustomed to
seeing dormers, gables and porticoes on every building. But cute-
ness is the glue that holds neighborhoods together at five units per
acre.
Like most visionary architectural schemes, this idea has sold more
books than houses. Its principles were known to planners early in
the century, when such charming communities as Scarsdale, N.Y.,
Mariemont, Ohio, and Lake Forest, Ill., were built. But they were
forgotten in the postwar rush to build suburbs on the same principles
of efficiency that had been employed in constructing anny bases.
Their first new application came a decade ago, when Duany and
Plater-Zyberk drew up plans for a small resort town on the Florida
panhandle, called Seaside. Seaside-with its cozy, narrow streets,
its jumble of pastel homes with mandatory front porches - is proba-
bly the most influential resort community since Versailles. Prince
Charles noted it approvingly in his BBC special on architecture.
Since then other "neotraditional" developments have been built in
places as far-flung as suburban Maryland (Kentlands, also planned
by Duany and Plater-Zyberk) and the outskirts of Sacramento, Calif.
(Laguna West, planned by Peter Calthorpe of San Francisco). But
the real test of this idea will come in about a year, when the Disney
Co. opens its first planned community ever, Celebration, Fla., on a
5,000-acre swath of land near Disney World. After considering a
typical subdivision built around a golf course, the company opted for
a plan which vice president Wing Chao described as "traditional
little-town America." Celebration will either validate the new ur-
MAY 15. 1995 NEWSWEEK 43
banism with the imprimatur of Disney- "safe for middle-class
consumption" - or proye the point ofits critics, that it's a plot to lure
unwitting citizens into Ih'ing in theme parks.
You can look at Phoenix as a pretty good example of what the
new urhanism is up against. It is among the five fastest-growing
metropolises in the country, and few places are as relentlessly
suhurban in character, It has a downlown so exiguous that a pedes-
trian outside its biggest office buiJdingat 90na weekday morning is a
phenomenon as singular as a cow in Times Square, Meanwhile the
new subdiyisions race each other toward the mountains. Del 'Webb
Corp,. a major national developer, recently won approval over
heated opposition for a 5.600-acre project in New River, 30 miles
north of downtown and at least 10 miles
beyond the outer edge of existing devel-
opment. The environment, which to de-
velopers used to just be the stuff they
knocked down to make room for houses,
is now a cherished selling point. There is
a catch, according to Frances Emma
Barwood, a city council member who
represents most of the sparsely populat-
ed northeast quadrant of Phoenix: "The
people who bought houses in Phase One
[of a popular development] were told
they'd be surrounded by beautiful lush
deserts, but instead they're surrounded
by Phases Two and Three."
MARK LAWREl'CE
'Seaside' planner
American city planning
went to hell during
World War ", says
Andres Duany, the
architect who, with his
wife and partner,
Elizabeth Plater-
Zyberk, designed the
neotraditionalist town
of Seaside, Fla. "Any
town-planning text
prior to 1935," he says,
"has references to
social issues, to
technical issues, to
esthetic Issues." But
after the war,
specialists and bean
counters took over. It
was as if AmerIca had
suffered a stroke: "We
lost language, we lost
the ability to think
complexly," As a result,
"the suburbs we have
are cartoons of
planning."
LEFT BEHIND IN THIS RUSH TO
embrace nature are thousands
of 1960s-era ranch houses that
are too old, small and unfash-
ionable to attract middle-class
buyers, and as a result are turning into
that new American phenomenon, the
suburban slum, This may be the fate of
an area called Maryvale, which like all
west-side suburbs suffers from the
competitive disadvantage that commut-
ers must drive into the sun both ways.
Interspersed among the houses are
large tracts of yacant land, dreary com-
mercial strips and a mall, once the
cynosure of a thriving neighborhood,
now dark and empty. "For the same
money that Del Webb is spending in
New River, I'll bet they could buy up
most of this area and rebuild it," God-
dard says. "What is the imperative that
says we have to go to a beautiful
rural area when we have all this land a
few miles from downtown? We're de-
stroying ourselves in shorter and
shorter cycles."
The imperative, as Goddard well
knows. is "the market." To build in an
existing neighborhood, says Jack Glea-
son, a senior vice president at Del Webb,
is to "run against the market, instead of with it." Banks are reluctant
to lend to such "inflll" projects because they have no assurance the
houses will sell. A prime engine of Phoenix's growth apparently
consists of middle-aged couples fleeing California. This is a market,
Gleason notes, heavily driven by "security," the polite term for
"Cear," "Fearof crime is a great motivator for development," says Joe
"erdoorn, a Phoenix planner, "Eyerybody wants to be on the far side
of the freewav."
So the ne\\;subdivisions go up behind ocher-colored stucco walls
e
44 :-; E \I' S \\' E E K MAr 1;). 1 995
In California, old farms are sprouting more houses than crops
DON'T FENCE ME IN
To run with the market is to develop
virgin land farther out, not to rebuild
dying communities closer to the city
six feet high, with guards and gates between the public roads and the
inner sanctum of residential streets. Other kinds of barriers defend
something nearly as dear to suburbanites as their own skins, proper-
ty values, Homeowners are isolated by design from apartments,
shops, public squares or anything else that might attract people with
less money or of a different race, Deed restrictions and community
associations see to it that no one wiII ever bring down the tone of the
neighborhood by turning his living room into a beauty parlor.
Success for a development lies in freezing for eternity the social and
economic class oC the original purchasers,
No wonder they're so sterile-sterility is designed into them!
Anything else is a threat to the steady appreciation of resale value
homeowning Americans take as a basic economic right. You drive
down the wide, curving streets of Terravita, in north Scottsdale,
whose sales slogan is "The Harmony of Land and Life," and the only
signs of "Life" are the saguaro cactuses, which accrue at the rate of
about an inch a year, The houses themselves are magnifIcent monu-
ments to family life: thoughtfully designed. carefully constructed,
wilh master bath suites the size of the Oval OfEce, but the face they
turn to the street is the blank brown plane of a three-car garage. '
To EVEN THINK OF CHANGING THIS CULTURE IS AN ENOI\-
mous task. It runs counter to the dominant ideology or
free-market economics, which in its reductive I~\shion
holds that developers by defmition are building what
people want to buy. "There is this strange conceit among
architects," says Peter Gordon, a prolessor of economics at the
University of Southern California, "that people ought to live in
what they design. If you look at how people really want to live in
this country, suburbanization is not the problem, it is the solution."
And for that matter, Oscar Newman, a celebrated New York-
based urban planner, descdbes the new urbanism as "a retrogres-
sive sentimentality." American families typically live in a neigh-
borhood for three to live years, forming comm\mities based not on
common birthplace but on interest: young singles, families with
children, "active adults," Who among us, Newman asks, really
wants to re-create the social ambience of an 18th-century village?
He thinks the suburbs need more exclusivity, gates and barriers
where none exist already, recognizing that most of us are going to
live among strangers for most of our lives.
On the other hand, people can buy only what's for sale. The
housing market is notoriously conservative and conformist, if lor
no other reason than that most people expect to sell their houses
someday. Perhaps more people would choose to live in urban
villages if they were exposed to them. "If you ask people if they
want 'density,' they will always say no," says Peter Katz, author of
"The New Urbanism." "But if you ask if they want restaurants and
schools and other things close to where they live, they say yes,"
t you couldn't build a village in most places in the country even
you wanted to. Suburban sprawl is built into the zoning codes of
most communities and the lending policies of vir-tually every bank.
Population Distribution
Since 1970, there have been more people in U. S,
suburbs than in central cities or rural areas,
',': Central cities
- Suburbs
Rural areas
l'l-:I\(;I':NT OF
POPULATION
50%
40
30
20
10
o
00 F~,. r~~
f~~ ;-,-i ~j
~l r~1 l'~
.' .,',
t_' ,
~
1':1
I~n
~. ~. }
,..~
,'"
>: :".
nt;;
1960
1990
1970 1980
1940
1950
SOURCE: BuREAU OFTHE CENSUS
1994
Area of city: 449,8 sq, mi.
Population: 1.052,000
1970
Area of city: 247.9 sq, mi.
Population: 584,000 }J
1950
Area of city: 17.1 sq, mi.
Population: 107,000
SOURCE: ern' OF PIIOF.NIX PI.ANNING DEPT.
IOIlf'i IIV\1BI.E
, For new villages to become a reality. they will have to gl'l past a
phalanx or planning boards and bank ollicers, whose lirst prin('iple
is. "Nobody ever lost his job ti)l' following the code,"
V\'e are, nevertheless, on the verge of a great opportunily,
Americans mo\'ed to the suburbs Ii.)r the best of motiws --10 gi\l'
their children better schools, cleaner air, a place to ride llwit'
bicycles without getting their tires caught in the trolley tracks.
Suburbs should teem with life, with humanity in all its diversity lor
as much diversity as you can find within one standard dedation of
the median family income)-with people walking. running. biking,
rocking, But their design has promoted instead the ideals of
privacy and exclusivity: the clapboard-sided ranch housl'. l'\'Ol"\-
live of empty plains; the brick colonial. hinting at descent fl'Om the
Virginia aristocracy. \Ye can continue the trend of the last 10
years, which Gopal Ahluwalia, director of research for the Nat iOI;-
al Association of Homebuilders, complacently describes as bigger
houses, with more amenities, situated farther from the workplace,
Or we can go down a dilferent path, which probably will begin
with the kind of humble observation a visitor made at a subdid-
sion near Phoenix recently. Like most new develupments. this Ol\('
aimed to conserve water lor important uses-namely the glJlr
course-by landscaping the hOllses with gravel and cactus ratllPl'
than lawns, As the visitor paced the lot with a puzzled look, it
suddenly dawned on him that the desire for an acre of land is nut
an unvarying constituent of human nature, "Gee," he remarked
wonderingly to a saleswoman, "if it's all gravel. you don't really
need that much of it, do you?"
\\'ill.1\IM;<: n: M A I.ON E {/",!I'ATIIIC K I\()(: E liS i/lI\'('II' l'"rk. NI S ,\ .\ "<.111' "
B I IlIJ 1.1': ;n ~\leml'/lis. S '"ENe Ell It E I ss in l\liami. J FAN: '" F (;0 Hun' 1/1 1.1i',
Angeles. PAUl. KANnf:Ll. ill Sail Fnltlcl."l'ooml DANIEl. (;LICK ill \\(I,h;Il.~lorl
M A \' I 5, I~) 9 5 N I': \\' S \\' E V K 45
..
LIFESTYLE
aysto
IX
~
.
"
t
e
s
Most of us actually know what we want in a neighborhood-we just don't
know how to get it, because developers have been building the wrong thing
for 50 years, Here's how to get our communities back on trac~.
Moving day at Kentlands, the neotraditional suburb in Maryland where houses are close to the street and to each other
JOliN IIUMIILE
e
OR DECADES, ANTON NELESSON OF RUTGERS
University has been using the tools of science
to pursue that most elusive and subjecti~e
quality, happiness. When a developer comes
into a community, humbly seeking permission
to re-create ancient Pompeii on the site of an
old Go Kart track, the town's planners com-
mission Nelesson to survey the populace and
determine if that's what they'd actually like
there. Using photographs, models and questionnaires, Nelesson
has surveyed people all over the country, and these are some of the
things he's found:
. "Everybody will call for a green open space in the middle-
that's automatic. They will put the major community buildings
around the plaza, then group the houses on relatively narrow
streets. Ninety-nine percent don't want streets that are more than
46 NEW S WEE K MAY 1 5, 1 9 9 5
two lanes wide. At the edges of the village they leave open space."
. "With two working spouses, [smaller lots] make a lot more
sense. You don't want to mow that big lawn,"
. "People have a fundamental, psychological, spiritual
response to nature. If you show them recently built multi-
family housing or office parks, they go negative. A small, tra-
ditional neighborhood is what people want. They don't know how
to get it."
Well, of course they don't: most of them haven't even seen a
"small, traditional neighborhood" in years, if ever. But they in-
stinctively choose it anyway. The premise of the new urbanism is
that people can have the kinds of neighborhoods they say they like.
Architects know how to design them, developers can build them,
banks can make money on them. All it takes is a measure of
political will to overcome the inertia of 50 years of doing things the
wrong way. . . and the application of a few simple rules. .
GIVE UP
JIG LAWNS
1 ONE USEFUL WAY TO DEFINE A sunUHn
is "a place that grows lawns." The great
postwar disillusionment began for
many Americans when they left the city in
search of a simpler life and discovered that
watering, fertilizing, weeding and mowing
the measliest yard takes more time over a
year than the average New Yorker spends
looking for parking. And the expanses of
front lawn themselves serve no purpose but
their owners' vanity - except that most sub-
urban communities require them, on the
theory that large setbacks help preserve the
bucolic character of a community.
That may have been true in the 1920s,
when suburbs were being settled 30 houses
at a time. But when highways opened up
huge areas of countryside after the war,
large-lot zoning had the opposite effect: by
spreading population over a larger area, it
accelerated sprawl. If zoning boards weren't
so fearful of "density," they could require
developers to cluster houses and set aside
land nearby for open space and recreation,
This is also a more efficient way to build a
community. Houses that are 100 feet apart,
obviously, have 100 feet of unused road and
utility lines between them. School buses
have that much farther to travel.
And the goal of making a walkable com-
munity is defeated when houses are spread
out on huge lots. Even the depth of the front
yard turns out to make a crucial psychologi-
cal difference. When houses are set back
behind 30 feet of lawn, the streetscape be-
comes oppressively desolate; your perspec-
tive changes so slowly you don't feel you're
reaching a destination. Probably no single
change would improve the quality of subur-
ban life as much as shrinking the size of
lots-and it would actually make houses
cheaper.
BRING BACK THE
I CORNER STORE
JOliN IIUMIlLE
This wide street in Temecula, Calif, is fine for cars but not for kids and other pedestrians
MAKE THE STREETS SKINNY
3Modern subdivisions are designed to be driven, not
walked. Even little-used streets are 36 feet or 40 feet
wide, with big sweeping curves at the corners. It's great
for cars: traffic barely needs to slow down. But for those
on foot, the distance is daunting. Narrow streets-as
little as 26 feet wide - and tight, right-angled corners are
a lot easier for walkers, and probably safer as well,
because they force drivers to slow down. One objection:
fire departments worry about getting trucks through.
But that hasn't been a big problem in old nabes in cities
like New York and Boston.
2THE SUBURBAN CONDITION, SAYS
architect Peter Calthorpe, "is a land-
scape of absolute segregation . . . not
just in terms of income, age or ethnicity, but
simple functional uses." This is so obvious
that most people no longer see the absurdi-
ty of making a five-mile round trip for a loaf
of bread. That is, as long as they have a car; for anyone not so
blessed -children, the elderly or handicapped, people who can't
afford a car for every member of the family-it's nuts.
Again, this is a function of good intentions undone by the explo-
sion of suburbia. What worked in a compact neighborhood in a
aa dry cleaner, a drugstore, a corner grocery-became gro-
e when blown up a hundredfold and applied to whole coun-
ties. Shopping strips stretched for dozens of miles along the
highways, while the curving streets of suburbia wormed their way
ever deeper into the countryside.
Obviously, malls and supermarkets, with their vast selections
and economies of scale, will never be supplanted by neighborhood
shopping streets and corner groceries. But it still should be possible
to provide some of the necessities oflife within walking distance of
many people. Then you could send your kid out for that bread -and
a newspaper while he's at it.
MAY 15, 1995 NEWSWEEK 47
I
.1
I
I
I
I
ONLY YOUR MOTHER IS MORE
o B S E SSE D WITH YOUR SAF ETY.
ForJ S<Jftt)' Ensinccrs: Karin H. Pu)'b)'Jo. Stel"l' P,nSSlon, Afja( Foslcr.
IVhere would we be without our mothers? The)' take care oj us and protect us. So, we're proud
to sa)', when it comes to saJe8uardin8 drivers, at FORD MOTOR COMPANY our maternal instinct
becomes ver)' apparent. You can Jeel it in our TRACTION CONTROL s)'stem, And in our
ANTI-LOCK BRAKES: It's wh)' DUAL-AIR BAGS' are standard in all our cars. And wh)'
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE is available 24 hours a Jay. We're also Jel'clopin8 a Vision
Enhancement S)'stem - to help drivers when "mother" nature acts up. All this miaht be
considered obsessive. But at Ford Motor Compan)', we believe such commitments to saJet)'
anJ securit)' will enhance the qualit)' oj all our lives, BesiJes, it's Jar )'our own 800J.
FOil D
FORD TRUCKS
..
LINCOLN
MERCUIlY
e
Qu
A
L
I
T
y
I
s
J
o
B
I,M
..-11..,,)' IIC.Jf}'O/lr \lllc,yhc:I"
DROP THE CUL-DE-SAC
. i
I t
I
I
l
4The cul-de-sac, a fancy term for "dead
end," has emerged as the street plan of
choice for modern suburbs, Its great ad-
vantage - the elimination of through traf-
fic-is also its weakness, because it com-
pels everyone in a given subdivision to
use the same few roads, often at the same
times, Anyone attempting to travel on
foot or by bicycle will eventually wind up
on the shoulder of a busy highway - and
probably give up. But streets don't have
to be like that: they can follow predictable
routes and interconnect. This gives mo-
torists a choice of routes, so they don't all
pile up every morning waiting to make a
left turn at the same intersection.
DRAW BOUNDARIES
5IN AN ABSOLUTE SENSE, THERE IS NO REAL SHORTAGE OF
land in the United States: if the entire population liwd on all
acre ofland per household, it would occupy less than 5 percl'llt
of the contiguous 48 states (plus all of Canada and .l\'\cxico Il)r
parking). But in the regions where Americans actually want to live,
they are swarming into the countryside, covering whole counties
with "edge cities" flung outward from the beltways as ifby centrifu-
gal force. New York City's suburbs reach across the whole state of
New Jersey into eastern Pennsylvania, nearly 100 miles from
Times Square. To new-urbanist theoreticians, this is the disastrous
result of shortsighted government policies, such as the bias in the
federal mortgage-guarantee program toward detached houses Oil
large plots of land. To free-market economists, it represents the
sum of millions of choices by informed individuals who have
decided that, on balance, getting up before dawn in Bucks County
beats a full night's sleep in Brooklyn.
But sprawl is not a necessary component of affluence. In Europe
and Japan, governments have proclaimed "urban-growth bound-
aries," beyond which development is more or less prohibited. Even
in a democratic country such as HoI-
land, a businessman seeking to live on a
farm and drive into the city to work
would have to request permission from
the government-and he might not get
it. Try telling that to Lee Iacocca. Con-
trary to popular American political the-
ory, these regulations haven't notice-
ably affected the prosperity of Western
Europe - nor of the one major Ameri-
can city that has instituted its own ur-
ban-growth boundary: Portland, Ore.
In Oregon, naturally, no one would
prevent the hypothetical businessman
from living on a farm; he just couldn't
sell it off for a subdivision when he re-
tired to Palm Springs. More than 20
years ago, planners for the Portland
metropolitan area drew a line around
325 square miles-covering 24 munici-
palities and parts of three counties-
and designated it to receive virtually all
population growth. Along the way they
have reduced the average lot size for
detached houses from 13,000 square
feet to an average of 8,500 square feet-
roughly the difference between putting
three and five units on an acre. The
proposed future goal is an even mingier
6,600 square feet. Between now and the
year 2040, Portland's planners expect
the population to grow some 77 per-
cent, but they are committed to an in-
crease of residential land use of only 6
percent. Instead of planting more "edge
cities" at the arbitrary points where
freeways intersect, Portland has con-
centrated job growth in its downtown.
The urban-growth boundary has been
so successful that even a conservative
property-rights group, Oregonians in
Action, endorses the concept (although
it argues with some details), Imagine
how Los Angeles would look today if it
had done this 20 years ago.
~;?JAM~ ~.W)LSON-NEWSW~EK
~,Leadmg new urbamst
H:~ ',~; ',~,., \-,>:. ,
<Nothing Irks Peter
;,;.Calthorpe more than
, l~t'naysayers who say that
f Americans don't want to
Clive In high-density
~fcitles-they want
l:isuburbs, as though
f:'.there were only two
$' choices!" According to
f)he San Francisco ,
\i~rchltect, "The answer
iils to understand there
~:lre a huge number of
"'i,"" "'-'~"'
:~\ people with different
~;lIfestyles. There are
r~: different densities In '
;';new urbanism, some
f'low, some high. '
f Neighborhoods that
(\ h~ve, ~ive~~ty-caflls,
It,recreatlon;' casual
~;;socialencounters-;
. ~fwm be Increasingly
~impoi1anl' Suburbs
l.1'aren'tjust about
~. bedrooms anymore."
~,.,-.- .
MAY 1 5, 1 9 9 5 NEW S W t: t: K 49
I
I
e'
I
I
I
!
,
I
e
L I F EST Y L E
HIDE THE GARAGE
6Most suburban houses give the ap-
pearance that they are first of all places
to park, turning to the world the blank
and desolate face of a garage door. N eigh-
borhoods look more pleasant when ga-
rages are put behind the houses, accessi-
ble by side yards or by alleys.
JOHN HUMBLE
Multicar garages turn an unwelcoming face to the street
MIX HOUSING TYPES
70F ALL THE WAYS TO IMPROVE THE SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL
organization of the suburbs, none would be as subversive as
breaking the monopoly of single-family detached homes: that
endless alternation of "Crestwoods" and '~uroras" intended to
foster the illusion of preference in buyers' choosing between four
bedrooms and three bedrooms plus a den. Homogeneity is the very
essence of the suburbs. Attached houses, rental units, shops or
businesses-anything that might attract traffic and its attendant
evil, a decline in property values-are banned.
This is a fairly new phenomenon in human history. For most of
the last 9,000 years, most people inhabited villages, where by
definition nothing was very far from anything else. As late as the
1940s, for that matter, Memphis, Tenn., developer Henry Turley
grew up in the kind of haphazard city neighborhood that is the
despair of sensible planners: a jumble of stores, shacks, flats, walk-
ups and decaying mansions, all suffused with the vivid street life
neighbors made for themselves in the era before air conditioning
lured them indoors. It is, of course, beyond the power of zoning to
bring back those days, even if we wanted them back, but it may be
possible to recapture some of the energy and spirit that character-
ized American civic life before television clamped its monopoly on
public discourse and entertainment. So in 1987, when Turley
bought a 135-acre vacant plot on an island in the Mississippi five
minutes from downtown Memphis, he embarked. on a radically
different kind of development, which began not by asking "What
50 NEW S WEE K MAY 15, 1995
will the county let me build?" or "What will the banks finance?" but
"What kind of place do people want to live in?"
The result was Harbor Town, intended to be "a slice of the
world-the more complete and varied the better." There are
houses ranging in price from $114,000 to $425,000, which contrasts
with a typical subdivision in Phoenix, Ariz., for example, where the
seven basic models run the gamut from $271,990 to $316,990. There
are town houses and apartments, and shops being planned. Devel-
opers had tried mixing housing types in the "planned communities"
of the 1970s, but in those each use was isolated in its own thousand-
acre quadrant; in Harbor Town they are all within a few blocks of
each other. Turley seems to have decreed that instead of golf, the
leading recreational activity would be chatting with neighbors
while watching the sun set over the river, so he set the houses close
together and built cozy village squares. The houses themselves are
an eye-popping collection of styles, including Charlestown provin-
cial, Cape Cod and Bauhaus modern, but they have an underlying
unity based on materials (mostly clapboard or wood siding) and the
ubiquitous new-urbanist amenity, porches. Turley expects to make
money on the project, when it's completed in 1997. but he also has a
higher aim. "Democracy assumes-demands-that we know, un-
derstand and respect our fellow citizens," he says. "How can we
appreciate them if we never see them?"
PLANT TREES CURBSIDE
8 Nothing humanizes a street more than
a row of trees shading the sidewalk.
But they must be broad-leafed shade
trees such as sycamores or chestnuts, not
the dinky globular things like flowering
pears that developers favor in parking
lots. And they should be planted out at
the curbline, where they will grow out to
form a canopy over the roadway.
Why don't more places have such an
obvious amenity already? Because traffic
engineers worry that people might drive
into them.
Strolling under a canopy of spring blossoms
DIANE COOK/LEN JENSIIEL
PUT NEW LIFE
INTO OLD MALLS
i;
9THEY'VE GOT FOUNTAINS, HANGING
ferns and ice rinks, and if you stay in
one long enough you may eventually
hear "Wichita Lineman" rescored for 140
violins, but'most shopping malls are, es-
sentially, just vast sheds that consumers
trudge through until, with nothing left to
spend, they are spit out into the parking lot.
No wonder people are so quick to desert
them when a bigger one opens up down the
road. Ghost malls are no longer a rare sight
in America. Phoenix has at least two, in-
cluding one right across the street from
several of its largest office buildings. But
the land they occupy can, with some inge-
nuity and a lot of money, become the nucle-
us of a real neighborhood, an architectural
adornment rather than a hulking blight.
The process is happening first with strip
shopping centers, which are usually older
than enclosed malls and less complex archi-
tecturally. The first step is to transcend the
definition of a "shopping center" as a group-
ing of unrelated stores in the middle of a
parking lot. That pretty much described the
New Seabury Shopping Center, a dreary
1960s-era strip mall on a busy highway in
Cape Cod, Mass., about 70 miles from Bos-
ton. A decade ago, the owners decided to
redevelop it on a radically different scheme,
modeled on a New England town. New
streets were laid out in what had been the
parking lot; new shops were built in the
neglected area behind the existing ones. A
25-year development plan was drawn up,
envisioning a substantial community; of-
fices, a library, a church and a senior-citi-
zens' home have already been built.
Parking was redistributed along the
curbs of the new internal streets. This
makes for some congestion and inefficien-
cy, but lessens the frustration of trudging
down long aisles of parked cars toward a
distant mall entrance. Developer Douglas
Storrs says that shoppers find the strength
to walk as much as half a mile down the
sidewalks of what is now called Mashpee
Commons, passing shop windows, benches
and planters. The same people reach the
threshold of exasperation when they have
to park more than 400 feet from the door to
an ordinary mall.
There are other examples, including
Mizner Park, in Boca Raton, Fla., where a
failing shopping center was replaced with a
28-acre mixed-use development organized
around a new public park. To be sure, not
all developers will be this ambitious with
their properties. But as a first step, hiding
the ugly collection of Dumpsters and load-
ing docks on the backsides of strip malls
could eliminate a lot of suburban blight.
, .
DfASF. COOK'I.F.N ,/ESSlIl'l.
In Portland, Ore., these commuters are choosing to ride the rails
PLAN FOR MASS TRANSIT
1 0 Is there any way to get Americans out of their
cars and into buses and trains? In Los Angeles,
not even an earthquake sufficed; only about 2 per-
cent of drivers switched to mass transit after their
freeways fell down last year, and most of them
went right back to driving as soon as the roads were
patched up.
The problem is that transit seems to need a critical
mass to work, and many metropolitan areas (Los Ange-
les among them) are just too spread out. Many commut-
ers seem to think that if you have to drive to the train
station anyway, you might as well just keep going to
the office.
Hence ealthorpe's idea for the "pedestrian pocket": a
relatively dense settlement within a quarter-mile walk
of a transit stop. In Portland, Ore., they're building the
transit line first-putting stops literally in the middle of
empty fields - in the expectation that the development
will follow.
MAY 15. 1995 NEWSWEEK 51
L I F EST Y L E
LINK WORK TO HOME
e
11 SUBURBS ARE NO LONGER JUST BEDROOM
communities; the dispersal of employ-
ment out of the central cities has been
going on for a generation. (As the writer William
H. Whyte demonstrated two decades ago, big
corporations leaving the city tend to relocate with-
in a few miles of the chief executive's house.) But
the result-the oxymoronic "office parks" consist-
ing of indistinguishable glass cubes amid a token
fuzz of grass and a giant parking lot-is just a
higher class of sprawl than the gas stations and
fried-chicken places that would have been built
there instead.
If companies do'n't want to be downtown,
they should at lel1st attempt to integrate their of-
fices-or factories, for that matter-into commu-
nities. Nobody Wants to live next to a steel mill,
naturally. But in Laguna West, outside Sacramen-
to, people are happy to live within a quarter-mile
of an Apple Computer plant, which provides 1,200
white-collar and assembly-line jobs. Apple agreed
to locate there after the community was already
planned; developer Phil Angelides says the com-
pany liked the idea that executives and workers
could afford to live in the same community. Playa
Vista, a new-urbanist community being planned
for Los Angeles, has been mentioned as a possible
home for the DreamWorks SKG multimedia com-
pany. It could be an updated-and very upscale-
version of the company town, which in this case
will comprise 13,000 houses and apartments, shops, a park,
promenades and jogging trails along the last tidal marsh in
the city,
Calthorpe believes that more businesses will move to new-
urbanist projects as they grow disillusioned with the traffic and
isolation of their office parks. "The idea is not necessarily to live in
the same development you work in," he says;
"there are a lot of criteria for where you choose
.your house, But if people can walk to a park, to
midday shopping, restaurants and day care, it's
better for the people working there."
SHRINK PARKING LOTS
13 PARKING IS ONE OF SUBURBIA'S HIGHEST
achievements. Only in the United States
does the humblest copy-shop or pizzeria
boast as much space for cars as the average city hall.
But it is also a curse; the vast acreage given over to
asphalt is useless for any other purpose, and goes
unused more than half the time anyway. Most plan-
ners regard parking as a prerequisite for economic
growth, like water. But dO\vntown Portland, Ore.,
which strictly regulates parking, has been thriving
with essentially the same space for cars as it had 20
years ago, Developers often build more parking than
they actually need; a half-empty lot is presumed to
reassure prospective tenants that they'll never run
out of space for their cars. Yet a bank, a movie theater
and a church are all full at different times. One simple
improvement towns can make is to look for ways to
share and pool parking space among different users.
The ideal-although expensive-solution to the
parking problem is for cars to vanish underground
when they get where they're going. A shopping center
surrounded by acres of striped asphalt, whether it's
empty or full, might as well put up a moat against
pedestrians. Large parking lots should be situated
behind buildings whenever possible-something
most suburban zoning codes don't currently allow-and divided by
streets, sidewalks or structures into smaller segments of around three
acres or less. On-street parking in residential neighborhoods is con-
troversial. Some planners favor it, because it creates a "buffer"
between pedestrians and traffic, but others consider it a danger to
children running out between the cars.
~<,;'.';: ':,;' ..' FREDERICK C1~RLE:;.>
~;:,A. ,d.ifferent appro(].~h}~.f;t
~?!~;'!~:'~f. <. :'~:,~;! ~?';>F- ";~?_::~~ .f1.i~>>, :.):~~:~:
'!;,Mbdng Income,l~v~lsln a"~;
~i~iig~~~~~~~~. i~;~~~~"S;~j
t~urbal1lst credo, and }:;
[{nobody does that ~ " .'
r,l),,,t""'';''';';'~;-''''''T':'-, ,'..'-' ;"'t!'r::..(/~~:",{"
~~than planner,Oscar};:rri"ti;)il
t......-'-;-,.,-.' ,."""." 'A" '-;.. _-, ,,'_1 ".(";-.'~id
E~~e.\\lf,I1,an.:',~lsscatte~ed~,&~
~sltelow71~come houSI~g';,
it9.rlX~n,~e~s,N:!~,IS'r' "
~'model of Its kind. But
f?NeWl11aln'IS' no fal1~f .he:,.
~~ew' urbanists. !'Insi~ad ',:~
~k'-~" ';,.:,,1..,"" . ':. " ' " ''', ',- . "'''''.~
~~f~~y1ng,"Th.I~ Isw~at~s.!i
~'~e~n:h:~ ::~~:;~~:;:1
t:' p~ople feel It's worth It
;:',to live there?' "
ie
MAKE A TOWN CENTER
12 Every town needs a center: a plaza,
square or green that is a geographi-
cal reference point and a focus of civic
life - even if that just means a place to
push a stroller or throw a Frisbee. Shop-
ping malls are a poor substitute; the area
they serve is too diffuse, and in any case
their civic function is incidental to their
real purpose - making money. Develop-
ers often provide some parkland in their
subdivisions, but it's usually on leftover
parcels that wouldn't be built on anyway,
by the edge of the highway or adjoining
another subdivision.
52 NEWSWEEK MAY 15,1995
---....
~
A. garish street lamp in Maryvale, a neighborhood in Phoenix
TURN DOWN THE LIGHTS.
14 It is probably true that illuminating a suburban
street to the level of the infield at Comiskey Park
reduces accidents, especially for people who leave their
regular glasses at home and have to drive in sunglasses.
For everyone else, though, towering, garish sodium-vapor
street lamps intrude on the peacefulness of the night with
the insistence of a stuck horn. Where safety is not a big
issue, why not use several smaller lamps that cast a
gentler glow and let you see the stars?
THINK GREEN
15 OUT BEYOND THE BELTWAY,
where the roads are narrow
and blacktop, past the point at
which the dwindling traffic is too sparse
to warrant plucking by even the mingi-
est motor court, there's a beautiful land.
There are pale green corn plants poking
through the brown soil. lakes glimpsed
through trees, cholla cactus among the
tumbled red rocks. It's not wilderness,
but countryside, the unfinished canvas
of America. It tells us where we are-in
Illinois, Maine or Texas-and it locates
us in time: summer, fall, vvinter, spring.
There's nothing to buy there, nowhere
to park; it doesn't lure us with golden
arches or free coffee mugs with a fill-up.
It's just there.
And by the same token, it isn't making
anyone rich, yet. There is a gradient
of value that runs from the city to
the country, and it keeps moving out-
ward; pick any spot and it's just a matter
of time before it makes the magical tran-
sition from "countryside" to "real
estate." The process seems inevitable.
but it isn't, really. It's the product
of concrete decisions made in an age
when roads were still viewed as the
harbingers of civilization rather than
discount muffler outlets. And as surely
as our society made those decisions,
it can change them, before lawn meets
lawn and asphalt meets asphalt, cover-
ing the land in a seamless carpet
of sprawl.
Developer Turley on the village green in Harbor Town
SCALE IN FEET
o
25 50
/ inch = 50 Feet
, c
;'\'
\...
<(..
()
I
/---
/
NO SCALE
SW 1/4
SE 1/4
/
/
/
/
/
ISO
'co
,,-t
",
,
:-....
,~
"
6'0
'co
,
.....'
.-.'l"
,~
\{
C'
:.-";:",-
, '..
~" ., /'t:
~ / /"C:' 1-..)0-
~ ~G
...
\
~
l,
\
,-\-
r......'
"'"
<y
~I
I
I
ICXJ
~~
~;j
~~
r - ~~
,.J (j
"...... ,\ ~ /v
.f').... , ~... V" ~v
"'<..J ,'>' '\. ~ ~
.... ~ ~~ \) .
~ tO~ ~ ~- ~~
~_ ~ ~,).~ ~OJor
C) ~l'<l .f V "
,CC> ;y<V
t"..i 0) .:.,f<I
'!... ~... o~ ~~"t
., ()J ~. ",CV I
,,\ "J
f) .... ~
~.. I
...', I
. , /
",
r '
~
" ,y
"
!
I
~'--- 0(0 inOqe
O~ ~
0~V
o
"<<.,,
(y ,0/
CJ o~
+;fJ.t
~
I
I
I
So
'co
Easemeli t
6'0
'co
? Drainage
And
Utility
70. 92
70,92
Fnd. I. P. With a 3 Inch
~Diame/er Brass Cap
/ "Judicial Landmark
.:; _ _RLS 9232"
,
339,14
- - - N89023 '47"W ---
o Denotes 1 inch by 14 inch Iron pipe monument marked
with a plastic cap inscribed RLS 19421, to be set WIthin
one year of the recording date of this plat
TI-f I~
CC)T I
r'j- -.
.... .. ""
....... -.....
. Denotes 1/2 inch iron pipe monument found marked
with a plastic cap insclibedRLS 13774, unless
otherwise indicated.
~
)J
o II
perSOll, ;." owner of the
io-wit:
of tile suuth 60U.00 feel oftllat oflhe ortl .lalfofthe
established and laid out in ~hction 32 in
to the United States Sl"vey thereof,
r the described
Northwest
thence west
centerline of
, thence south
, a distance of 721.00 feet, to the po in
with the north line of said North Half of
5, and said described line
CJ Mot
Section
D
/
All that pHrt of Ow \;n..
Townshi 3U
line:
Ol,thwest
Besota which lies
of Section 32,
of the follow lUg
/
of the NOI-thwest , distant 365.00
to a point on the north line of said
, distant 377.00 feet west of the
/
feet w,,'st of the
sou 00.00
Ilm-tlwast corner
Sll ed tu and
ions or restrictions.
llave caused the same to be
the for public use fon:ver
shown on this for and
())
i'-
(j
i'-
\\000 and do hereby donah: and dedicate to
North and also dedicatr the easements as
0/
'1'
~
" ~
fJ.t I,
'IV <(- \
00/ \
oV)
'I
'V
~
~.
~
t,
v
In witness when:of said John
,1995.
ha,
';t
i'-
r<)
())
oto set his hand lhis
day of
, a
~
J
\
\
I
\~
~' \
I, Oft;
\t 0'\
--,..... "?q,,
~I "\.
\ And t
) Eose((ll:. n .
1
I
1
1
i
)
I
inoesota
John E.
STATE 0 F
liN'ry OF
The foregoing instrument ,John
, 199::;,
tgeT,
dill 0,\
before me this
"I'
~Droinage
utili ty
01;1 blir.
'Olllmission
}I'opel'ly described 011 this plat as
correctly shown
the ground as shown
and that there are 110 wd !a
other than
,
~ ..
~
~. RIVARD
~alld SurveyOl'
Number 19421
/' U:::y
And/
/
-- -")
fosemen t /
I
STA'TE 0
COUNTY
The foregoing Surveyor's
me this
Number 19,jZI was
-~---m'___--_"-~-'--------~_~~__"'______________'______~m
Nota ___~___ COUllty,____
( ommission
Approved
'wd is in
this __ day of
Minnesota
\0
(J)
cO
, 1995,
Pursuant to Chanter 820, La\\s or
. 1995.
97 , III
approved this
da\ of
North Line SOL )
ICO,CXJ Feet of I
N 1/2 NW 1/4,
g
(j
o
Surveyor
There are no delinquent taxes, the
has been eutend
Wit, 0 3 I 'Jell
Br
Lon 'Jork
9232"
taxes
for the year 1995 h;lVe been
and transfer
\Vashingtoll Co. Auditolll'reasu
t'" - , I
,,:'I ,_
-,
I I':'
I ~
I... I
ENT N I \UH~R
hereby cel'tify iat III instrument
of ~__,__ ,1995 at
in the of
. a d was
(
n Recorder for record 011 this
recorded in County
_ _ day
Yt W
OAK/JALE. IINN.ESOTA
(612) ? 5--7606
L,
Ill..:
lkt:d a~ Judh.lal]
ldiL[ul Dbllh,'l CotuL On!..:! XIII I!,..: c>:LlI..:! oj ~..:..:liuLl by
IdlllilioIl b I :lU Il::..:l \ILsl iUJd (u)-j Icel 11\'1 tll oltltc: '.IOllC lHODlLlllLlll
Orientation of this bearing system is assumed,
--
Washington County Recorder
/ 11\-~
I ,,~ I II" V
/ I I I
I I / I I \ i "
f \)
fi / I I ~ i I
I \
c," } I \ \
I t I I \f ~
/ I / I I
/ I ,IJ I \
} I ') I
\
I I [A~t
I I \
I I tiki/ ~tfll)'
I I q t f!OO~
I
\
\\
\ \
:r.04
~t';" ~\
f ( \
)\
I
~\ I
(
I
I
I
i
~
^'
/ w"
I
\
'"
~
/
C:o
'"
I
'-
'.1
'"
,
/
I
"
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
" II
~
\ \
\ "
\ \,
\ \
~Ih"",""
'I&~
Q
0-
J\
i
\
\,
I
(
'V
>-
I
(
"
I
/
/
/
/
"
"
\,
\
\
;? /) Ii
/1
\
,
/
/
-'4(,.
"
"-
"
"-
"-
'..,
\...
,
"
"-
~ '
~
"
"
"-
/
I
I
/
"
"-
"-
\
\
.'J
/
/."J,
\
l
I \ I
1
"'---r
-A/
I
jl,
AT!
\.
,
~
"
'~
',<\
, ,\
.~
.'
I \
\
\ \
',,'
"
\
\
\
\
~\ \,\
\,
'\
\
\, \
,
~
/ "
/
/ /
I
\,
\ \
,
\
,
\
'\ '\
\ \,
. \
\, \
, \
\, \
, \
\\
"
V'
--
I)
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
~/ I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/;
/1
I--J
,y
,5\
''\\
I'
I'
...!e--
"
!
/
'1'
/t.
J
/
,//
i A
I
) J -J .J (
/
)
/
I
/
$/
I
$
\
f
/
. /
/ / /
/
/
/
I
"
r,
/
/11
l
/
/
/
"
/
_/
II
,
OAlIDALE
,
(612)
'\ '~ ~,
"
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
I
I
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
\
)
\
\
\
'-'
('
I h"
1,,,-,
Ir-'r"
I""
I,d
Iy-
/
1
II
r
! I
I 1
l I
. I
i
\ i
\t
\
\
/
/
/
I'
1/
I
f,tl
If
/
"rIS"ilt;;>
~ Ii 'f(7.t
/
/
;'
< / ~/
,,/ /' 1"
!
\ / /
/
~/ /
), , l- I) "
~ " I
/ / /
"
/ I
/
(
,4C1/'
...-;;--
/
1/
/ I
I
I\J ;
"
I
!
(
I
/
Iii!
$t
,
/
i
I
J
J
/
/
111
" /
I
/
I
I
/
/
,tt
/
j
I
/
/
// /' /'
r,1
(
< [1
(rl
"-
\ ,
I "(') "- .....Vcf'"
,
\ ~ \. "-
I '- ,.,,,
\ \ "-
"- "-
'- "- " '-
"-
~'" \
"- "-
\
\ "
"-
"- -',
"-
"
"
.' I
r
,/ / ,_f,','
/
! /
/
I /
r" /
vJA'1 /
/
/ /
/
/ I .'\ .'
/
/ / ,// f.
/ '\
/
/,,
I
/
!~ "
Ij.~
/
,/
I
/
/
/
/
/
n
0,'
\
k;' ';
,
,):
!
,
/, (0" R.O,
,K
9'f'i!
:I",",o~
'-
----
"
'f
l
\
45Q
\.~c'
/
I
/
I
,V
I
/
I
/
"","
...
4. (I'
56'
Sfl
~ -.-..-- - ----
---......"
.....-.- -...,.,..-:,
I
,/
...
----~
"'f,:L
/'
J
-'"
"~ -. ~.
-- -
..~- ....--~
------56-
- - - ~V
-X'(;
"
--Sy,-
,
5'-("
(lUJP
~16
~i
jI
\r-1,
. I If!;
TtV I
, I
J:
o
Q
SQ~
5r~ ) S OIA./ tI f'Jof?
.\
\
Q
rlf~
----------~- 2..5 (J
{>
9;:!lw
(, \ I I
qb't. I l f;
\ 14D
u
..
/00 (/
1-
, I f ,,'~"'~-7-- ",,'-'''~----'-~'''''''-''"''''
'"
2.0
()
A;~
o
JALiLL
I 0
Cfo
o ()
. cTf;:;5
i
I
\
\.
:;
\J
//1
/
/
8
\~.o
\
b
\
\
"
(J
AP
,,~
f)
15
~
)~
L
r
T
o
9'!;~
~,2J c;>
o
!)
t/. ....2~.4:
w
;\.
\
1\
!~
I
\
!'
I:
t<
i-
o
~ v
/ 2-t
~
',~~"
16 is - 12.
C(..{~ ?;
" ,
,\
t(; -
I "
roC)
c; e:/J
V
T CI f L F.,u' 1/6.&/L
)
B
G' /VIA PLE
r
,-
2../1- u
~' "
.;.
J
f,
b
so
1:loT'c. :
, /
[u -
PI-
J
95 -