HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-30 CC Packet Special Meeting
e
-
CITY OF STILL WATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 95-19
May 30, 1995
SPECIAL MEETING
7:00 P.M
City Council Chambers
Oak Park Hei~hts City Hall
14168 57th Street North
Oak Park Heights, Minnesota
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Joint meeting with City Council of Oak Park Heights to discuss issues related to new
interstate bridge.
2. Other Business
ADJOURNMENT
tit
e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
SUBJECT:
MN/DOT letter regarding Hwy 36 Imp.
DATE:
May 26, 1995
At the workshop meeting with the Oak Park Heights (OPH) City Council on May 9th the City of
Stillwater was asked if we had given our approval to MN/DOT for the Trunk Highway 36
improvements. The staff responded in the affirmative. The OPH Council seemed to be surprised that
we had already given approval because they had only received plans for the proposed Trunk
Highway improvements on or about April 20, 1995.
Subsequent to the meeting I learned that the approvals staff were referring to was based on the
preliminary design and not the final (or updated) work. The city received the updated plans referred
to by OPH on or about April 20th and City Engineer Eckles is in the process of reviewing the plans.
Mr. Eckles will be making a recommendation to the Council on the plans at the June 6th Meeting.
Therefore the answer to the OPH question regarding City of Stillwater approval of the Trunk
Highway 36 improvements should have been !l2.
~ \If' .. "l, ~ ,,"I ~.. 101. ..,..1 .. .".l....l.
'"
tit
MEMORANDUM
)(;r. PAUL. MN
o M!NNEAPQUS. MN
o 5T. CLOUD. MN
:.:: CHIPPE"NA FALLS. WI
:: :\:':"Ji$ON. vV/
TO:
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
FROM:
Glen Van Wormer
DATE:
May 25, 1995
RE:
Stillwater, Minnesota
Area Traffic
5/30/95 Presentation
SEH No. A-STILL9401.00
Attached is an outline with incorporation of some of the data to be presented to the joint Oak Park
Heights/Stillwater Council meeting. There are many past reports, studies and letters which could
be attached or referenced. Rather than prepare one more report, presentation of facts in the outline
supplemented with additional data at the May 30 meeting may be more beneficial for the Council
members rather than another report to read.
tlo
Attachment
Ie
U.)/~;;)/~I.) ....IO:U'I .~rl.l
,J;:';~.. ..J... ,,' :1...;....
",~-.~~~ ...,l.. ......J....",. ':"..J.J...J..
~.!i.:.J '.' .... 'l.o',' .'" "::
'-l
I.
Traffic Volumes (Daily)
A. Bridge
1962 - 4,900; 1970 - 8,000; 1980 -11,000; 1990 -15,000
Forecast wIth new bridge for year 2017 - 41,000 both bridges
e
B. Other Locations
South Main Street
County Road 5
Greeley Street
Osgood Avenue
16,500
10,000
10 ,500
7,500
II. Traffic Composition On Bridge
A. Vehicle Occupancy
All trips 1.70 person/vehicle
Work trips 1.12 person/vehicle
B. Trucks
Truck-trailer combos 1.1%
C. Work Trips
Va of Stillwater Bayport Oak Park Heights work force comes from Wisconsin.
III. Accident Rates (Accidents/Million Vehicle Miles)
A Minnesota t\.vo lane segment 4.6 (1.7 State average)
B. Minnesota four lane segment 2.2 (2.2 State average)
C. Wisconsin, River to STH 35 4.1 (2.2 State average)
D. Wisconsin, STH 35 to 15th 12.4 (2.2 State average)
IV. Lift Bridge
A. Schedule
Now up to 11h. hour waits between lifts at peak times.
B. Number
400/ year
21 times/day on weekdays, 22 on weekends
C. Length
Average 8 minutes
e
OS/25:95 16:0i FAX
SEH ST. PAUL
v.
Past Efforts at Increasing Capacity in Stillwater Area
A. Parking Removal
Chestnut Street - Main Street to Rivet"
Main Street
B. Turn Prohibitions
C. Turn Lanes
D. Traffic Signal Timing and Phasing
E. Potential Downtown Bypass
F. One Way Street Considerations
G. Street Widening
~-.... STILLWATER
VI. Travel Demand Management Strategies (Past and Potential)
A. Truck Diversion
B. Ridesharing
1. Van pool/employer
2. Car pool
3- Transi t
C. Restraints
1. Diversion
2. Pricing
D. J.ift Bridge Restrictions
E. Others
!4J00-l/00,l
".
e
e
--,.
"
..
e
r illwater
'~- - ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
May 9, 1995
Mr. Mark Benson, P.E.
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge Building
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Re:Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for new St. Croix River Crossing.
Dear Mr. Benson:
The City of Stillwater has reviewed the FEIS for the new St. Croix River Crossing and offers the
following comments. The comments are listed by page as they appear in the FEIS text.
Page/Paragraph
Comment
pps 1-1, 1-18
-The Summary and purpose of the FEIS is written clearly - significant
impacts are listed in Table 1-1. Aesthetic, noise and wildlife impacts are
identified.
-Revised and new information has been included in the report to
more fully address the impact area and respond to comments on the
Draft EIS.
p.2-1,2-17
-This section defines in detail the need for a new bridge. In addition to the
FEIS discussion the City of Stillwater is concerned about area-wide and
regional traffic that is significantly impacting local road conditions in the
City of Stillwater. Current traffic on CR5, Osgood, Greeley, Myrtle and
Third Streets are of concern and would be significantly reduced by the
bridge improvement. Access to the Downtown for residents and visitors
would also be improved with the construction of the bridge.
2-15
It is worth emphasizing the new bridge is consistent with the City of
Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Washington Cou~ty Comprehensive Plan
and Regional Transportation plan. This is not a new project. It has been
in planning documents for many years.
e
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE: 612-439-6121
,~-
Mark Benson
Page 2
e
3-1
Many alternatives including no build and TSM improvements were
considered in detail. The City of Stillwater has studied TH 36 related
traffic problems for many years and a bridge is the only practical solution
to existing traffic conditions.
Other areas:
Bike Trails and Walkways - The final design for the bridge and roadway related improvements
should provide to the maximum extent for bikeway and walkways for access along the Highway
Corridor and connecting Oak Park Heights to Stillwater. A continuation of the St.. Croix River
walkway /bikeway connecting Bayport and Stillwater should also be provided.
DNR Launch Ramp - The City of Stillwater supports the construction of a launch ramp at the
base of the bridge north ofthe NSP site as a possible project mitigation.
Existing Stillwater Lift Bridge - The City of Stillwater agrees with eliminating the existing
bridge from the new bridge decision. As detailed in the memorandum of agreement, the lift
bridge will be considered at a later date including section 106 review.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the FEIS. The City of Stillwater looks forward to
a final decision and completion of the new bridge in 2000.
e
OS/25/95
11:36
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS 4 6124390456
NO. 425
GJ01
'Ii
e
CITY OF
OAK PARK HEIGHTS
A MINNESOTA STAR CITY
May 22, 1995
Mark Benson
Minnesota Department of Transportation
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
Re: Final Environmental lmpact statement - New St. Croix River
Bridge Crossing
Pear Mark:
The following letter constitutes the City Council of Oak Park
Heights official comments on the Final EIS for the Proposed St.
Croix River Bridge. The City Council finds the Final EIS '
inadequate for the following reasons.
l} The Final EIS inadequately eonsiders crossing alternatives
other than ~he preferred alignment, and was drafted with a
bias toward the selection of, the northern alignment of the
Southern corridor1 to wit,
A) The response given to the City of Oak Park Heights
Resolution 90-05-18, passed May 29, 1990, which stated
the City's preference for the Central Corridor, was
inadequate because the criteria listed to justify the
decision have not been used with the same consistency
in evaluating the other alternatives.
B) The Final EIS makes no response to the City of Oak Park
Heights Resolution 92-05-24, passed May 26, 1992, which
stated that the City of Oak Park Heights, after
consultation with the City of Stillwater, was willing
to consider the southern or central alignments of the
southern corridor.
C)
The Final EIS fails to consider the _possibility that
the navigation channel, which ends at approximately the
north edge of Stillwater, could be ended south of
Stillwater, making the central Corridor more viable.
e
14168 North 57th Street. Box 2007 . Oak Park Heights, 'Minnesota 55082-2007
OS/25/95
11:37
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 425 ~0~
r
May 22/ 1995
Final EIS Response - Page 2
e
D) The Final EIS fails to consider the possibility that
the seldom used railroad tracks could be removed,
thereby making the Central Corridor more viable.
E)
There are many parks in other communities located under
bridges without adverse effects. Using the impact of
the proposed bridge on a park that Stillwater has not
even built yet as a justification for avoiding the
Central Corridor is a criteria which does not recognize
the common exiscence of such parks in other
communities.
F) The Final EIS makes no mention of a bridge proposa1
submitted at a public hearing by Richard Kilty, a
bridge designer and Stillwater resident, which used
both the Central Corridor and the existing Lift Bridge.
~
G) The size of the bridge will encourage the sprawl of
Minnesota residents and businesses into Wisconsin,
rather than just solve the current ,traffic problem.
2) The Pinal 'E!S fails to evaluate the entire impact of the
propoaed a11gnment; to wit,
A) Only commuter noise impacts were evaluated, tourist
traffic noise impacts were not.
B} The visual impact of the bridge in the northern
alignment in the Southern Corridor is obViously
considered a less important criteria than the impacts
on farmland, topography, and wetlands on the Wisconsin
side. Yet subsequent evaluation has shown that the
farmland, topography, and wetland impacts are similar
on all alignments of the Southern Corridor, so why
hasn't the visual impact of the bridge, which does vary
with each alignment, been given more importance?
C)
MNDOT's own origin-destination traffic study, prepared
by George Cepresa, State Traffic Forecast Engineer and
dated July 19, 1993, showed that over a third of
westbound traffic from Wisconsin that crosses the
current bridge has a destination within Stillwater.
The Final EIS has failed to evaluate where that traffic
is going and whether the proposed bridge and corridor
will actually resolve the downtown Stillwater traffic
problems.
e
OS/25/95
11:37
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ~ 6124390456
NO. 425
[;10:
..
e
May 22, 1995
Final EIS Response - Page 3
3) Many of the impacts of the proposed alignment that are
evaluated are evaluated inadequately; to wit,
A) The Final EIS states that Cover Park will not be
affected. It's hard to imagine how this statement can
be made when the majority of the residences around
Cover Park are being removed and when the Beach Road
overpass that connects the neighborhood to the rest of
Oak Park Heights is being removed. The fact is the
Cover Park neighborhood will be isolated by the bridge
construction, the residents on the north side of
Highway 36, for whom Cover is their neighborhood park,
will have no access to the park, and Cover Park will be
adversely impacted.
B) The Final EIS understates the impact on the scenic
overlook. How scenic is the view going to be when
someone's entire view will be the bridge?
4) It fai~B to consider the adopted local transportation plans
of the City of Oak Park Heights in contrast to its
references to the plans of other communities.
SUMMARY: While the Final EIS makes constant references to.a
balanced decision-making process, two things are quite
clear.
A) Some criteria are mo%e important th~n 9t~~
criteria, and MNDOT never stated what the order of
importance of those criteria are, which makes
adequate and consistent evaluation of all the
alternatives impossible.
B) Some communities a~~ more i~ortant than others,
and it is obvious that when the hopes and dreams
of all the communities involved in this process
were evaluated, that those of Oak Park Heights
were given the least consideration.
e
I
Sincerely,
~~~
Michael Robertson
City Administrator
cc: City Council
City Attorney
City Engineer
City Planner
,.. III
e
e
May 9, 1995
Joint Meeting of Stillwater and Oak Park Heights City Councils
Topic: Interstate Bridge issues
Meeting convened jointly by Mayor Kimble and Mayor O'Neal
Present:
Stillwater:
Oak Park Heights:
Kimble, Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller
O'Neal, Kern, Robert, Schaaf, Swenson
O'Neal: Purpose of meeting is to know how each city is looking at bridge issue
Kimble: Stillwater on record for long time as actively seeking new bridge to alleviate traffic
problems in downtown and increased traffic on residential streets due to avoidance
of downtown traffic
O'Neal: New Oak Park Heights Council opinions/direction on bridge issue is different from
previous Councils. Requested each Councilmember express individual opinion on
current bridge proposal.
Stillwater:
Cummings: Doesn't understand design of bridge, goes up river; trying to appeal to
Wisconsin; maybe overdesigned; traffic good for downtown.
Bealka: Also questions design, impact on Sunnyside. Asked how many homes are
impacted and what percentage want to sell.
O'Neal: 70 homes directly. Most are looking to relocate in Oak Park Heights,
want bridge issue settled
Zoller:
Works for MnlDOT and bridge also would be viewed from back yard;
originally didn't think bridge necessary, now sees residential need to alleviate
local traffic; prefers freeway design instead of compromise of stoplights, but
satisfied with compromise. In favor of bridge and proposed location.
Thole:
Understands business loss on Hwy 36 while grade lowered; business people
downtown say traffic killing them. Approves of need.
1
.. ...
Oak Park Hei~hts:
e
Swenson: Oak Park Heights loss is greater than the benefit; loss of property taxes, homes;
questioned reason for angle of bridge; damage to 60th Street business; Wants to
see alignment changed; wants some respect from Mn/DOT for Oak Park Heights
concerns.
Schaaf: Questioned why have to destroy valley to save it; believes the two councils could
solve traffic problem; might see worse traffic conditions after bridge; would most
benefit Wisconsin; takes every 15th single-family home in Oak Park Heights -
residents prefer to stay but can't see and just want out now. Not opposed to
improved river crossing; wants two Councils united and spend money to develop
alternatives, utilizing Mn/DOT traffic studies for the future.
Robert: EIS corridor selected over chosen route of Oak Park Heights because of cost; last
night received Mn/DOT traffic projections; supports central and southern central
(rejected by Mn/DOT); Oak Park Heights has right to appeal Mn/DOT decision;
bridge won't stop Stillwater's lack of parking or poor traffic flow problems; bridge
unsightly; want modified central corridor with historical looking bridge; City could
condemn some buildings and get parking ramps at Mn/DOT expense. Want to
form joint committee of two councils with representatives of organizations opposed
to bridge to develop unified approach.
Kern: Concerned with location, loss of homes, business loss. Wants joint committee.
O'Neal: Public safety is No.1 issue - ambulance can't get across river, Oak Park Heights at
end of line in case of toxic spill evacuation. An impact exists in any location.
Need bridge; should get on with it. People in United States think of "bridge" as a
negative rather than the European mystique of bridges - can accent river and also
deal with public safety issues. Have an opportunity to make constructive
suggestions to Mn\DOT, but will not stop bridge. Putting in appellate panel will
take the bridge out of reach. Will potentially be freeway, otherwise no Federal
money would have been allotted.
Discussion
Zoller: If delayed, there will be no bridge. Money will be spent elsewhere.
Kimble: Historic Bridge must be maintained if no replacement bridge (1929 Federal)
Doesn't hurt to discuss, but when do we reach the point of no return?
Requested copies of traffic reports. (Distributed at this time)
2
e
'",
e
Schaaf:
Kimble:
Schaaf:
Kimble:
O'Neal:
Is City traffic 365 days/year or seasonal?
365 days
Mn\DOT study shows 38% crossing bridge have Stillwater as destination.
Questioned accuracy; where was traffic study taken.
Between Sunnyside and downtown
If don't spend the $80 million, what is the alternative?
Long discussion on traffic study ensued
Thole:
O'Neal:
Schaaf:
Zoller:
O'Neal:
Magnuson:
O'Neal:
Kimble:
Zoller:
Thole:
O'Neal:
Zoller:
Kimble:
Request for joint planning is OK, but could not agree with spending money on
engmeers.
Are all in favor of bridge?
in favor of "improved river crossing"; can't accept Coast Guard decisions
Coast Guard has priority on decisions; order of priority is waterways, rail, car
Time is running out. Must vote within 120 days or appellate panel takes over.
(Question on who chooses third person - Answer: Oak Park Heights and Governor
has to agree on third) We are elected by people and are giving up our power if
don't vote. TH 5 to 95 is only part appellate board would deal with.
Voting on design
Requested copy of City comments on EIS
Only draft completed; will provide to Oak Park Heights after final approval.
Want to know repercussions if project delayed. Will not vote until then.
Open to delay if can convince him need for change in corridor
What would stop construction of bridge?
Change location too much - new EIS, etc. would be required. Mn\DOT will give
project money to another project. Interstate Bridge no longer No. 1 priority.
Wakota Bridge and other projects now strong.
Request Administrator/Coordinator ask same questions of same people; compare
for consistency of answers. Should meet again when answers available.
-' ,'- -:'~::;~;.:t'~:r~r-c-"",,--,-=;c;":;c ~_-
Oak Park Heights: S
that time.
eting, so need to meet prior to
e
3
Schedule joint meeting of Oak Park Heights and Stillwater City Councils for May 30,
1995, at 7 p.m. at Oak Park Heights. All in favor.
Motion Thole/Zoller: Adjourn at 9:40 p.m. All in favor.
Motion Schaaf/Swenson: Adjourn at 9:40 p.m. All in favor.
4
. e
..
e
e!
..
Special Meeting
STILL WATER CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
May 30, 1995
7:30 p.m.
The Meeting was convened jointly by Mayor Kimble and Mayor O'Neal in the Council
Chambers of Oak Park Heights City Hall.
Present: Stillwater City Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor
Kimble
Oak Park Heights City Councilmembers Kern, Robert, Schaaf, Swenson and
Mayor O'Neal
Absent: None
Also Present: Stillwater City Coordinator Kriesel
Stillwater City Attorney Magnuson
Stillwater Community Development Director Russell
Oak Park Heights City Administrator Robertson
Oak Park Heights City Attorney Vierling
Glen Van Wormer, Consulting Traffic Engineer
Press: Julie Kink, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Dennis Cassano, Star/Tribune
Others: Charles Siggerud and Mark Benson, MN/DOT
1. Joint meeting with City Council of Oak Park Heights to continue discussion of issues related
to new interstate bridge.
Council met with the Oak Park Heights City Council to continue discussion of each
City's views on the interstate bridge.
Glen Van Wormer, City of Stillwater Traffic Engineer, Chuck Siggerud, MN/DOT
engineer, and Mark Benson, MN/DOT engineer presented background information on the
proposed interstate bridge.
Each Council indicated that they would need to pursue their own interests because a
common position was not determined by the joint Councils.
...
Stillwater City Council Minutes
Special Meeting
May 30, 1995
2. Other Business.
Permit for Antique and Book Festival
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole to approve the
request for a permit for the Antique and Book Festival to be held June 2-4, 1995 on Main Street.
All in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller to adjourn the meeting at
9:12 p.m. All in favor.
~~
ATTEST:
f'r\~ I;)I~
\ CITY CLERK
2
Opinion .................. page 4
Comics .................. page 5
Wellness ................ page 6
sports ................... page 7
Legals .................... page 9
Classifieds ... pages 10-11
Townsnlp IS
nanning again
Due? technical error, we are
running the fire story from
Monday's Evening Gazette in
its entirety. ... See PAGE 12.
Bayport council
to wait on grant
By MICHAEL HORSMAN
Gazette Correspondent
BA YPORT- A plan to secure
a $500,000 federal grant which
would help pay for the
construction of the Fourth
Avenue South sewer line was
put off again, this time until
June, by the Bayport City
Council at a special meeting
Monday night.
The sewer line is to be
constructed in order to link
Anders.cn Corp.'s new wood
processing plant to the city
sewer system, and the city is
Deputies quell fight
Staff report
Washington County sheriff's deputies were called to Afton State Park
this morning after a fight broke out among students during, apparently, a
field trip.
A park official said that an educational group of about 150 students
from a Twin Cities-area school were visiting the park when the fight broke
out. No one was seriously injured, the official said.
A sheriff's department spokeswoman said it was not known if deputies
made any arrests. The department had no official comment at press time on
the incident. i
The incident was first reported to parks officials- at about 11:30 a.m., and
officials were toJi..a stabbing may have occurred. The report was
unfounded, the p~fIicial said.
I! .
waiting for the window maker to
respond to the city's request for
grant administration cost
reim bursement.
City Administrator Ken
Hartung told the council at the
May 1 meeting that
administrative costs associated
with preparing the grant
application and monitoring the
project could ultimately exceed
$26,000, a figure now estimated.
at $27,000.
The grant is awarded through
(See Bayport,. page 12)
.. ~ .. ~~ ~ ....,1,... ~ r
"...:~'~ MINNESOT A ~ />.... -.".,
:.ii'.......'y.""..U.'..'.'."E'.'."...S....."'.D....,.'''"''''A....'..y,.,./..,.\.(:
. ,-" '.......
.' ......... '.' . ...
.......................... .,--.'
~,~li~li~i~i!~~l{1
finas final EIS flawed
By NEAL JENSEN
Gazette Correspondent
OAK PARK HEIGHTS - The City of Oak Park Heights has sent a
letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOn calling the
final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) inadequate for the new bridge
crossing the St. Croix River.
Mayor Barb O'Neal read the letter to the council Monday night..
The letter outlined four areas in which the city of Oak Park Heights
found the EIS failing, including not considering all aspects evenly and
failing to make acqrrate projections.
"The final EIS inadeq'.al,-ly cOllsiders crossing alternatives other than
the preferred alignment. "nd was drafted with a bias toward the selection of'
the northern alignr em of the Southern corridor," the letter first stated.
(See Bridge, page 12)
YMCA an alternative to the meat market
By JUSTINE LaMONT
Staff Writer
HUDSON, Wis. - Sick of those health
clubs where you feel like you're on display and
everyone's there to find a date? St. Croix Valley
YMCA in Hudson might be a nearby solution.
"This is a place where overweight people .can
come and feel comfortable, and where 35-year-
old men can come and learn to swim for the .
first time," said Program Director Shelly
Evenson. "People who don't want to wear
slinky high-cut leotards and tights cani wear
their sweatpants and T-shirts. You're not a
showpiece here." . .
The facility just had its open house and
grand opening last week when more than 1,300
people came in to tour the building. .,
Before the opening of the Hudson facility,
the only real fitness club choices for St. Croix
Valley residents were a small hotel ~eight
J room and pool, or clu.bs ~n S1. l?aul al'.d.
I Stillwater. "It's someihing this community has ..
I needed for so long," Evenson said.
While it only took,three years, not the
average six, to plan out and build the new
YMC~, Evenso~ said the project was really 10
. " .1. ,~ ".
._ -a-a...on ~at.er Sl.urutsC n:;~el. VUU'
and feeder main was $310,565,_
undercutting Engineering
down in 'order - to keep more
general open hours on the
courts.
Bridge t
(Continued from page 1)
It cited the Oak Park Heights Council passed a resolution in' May of
1990 that stated the city's preference to the central corridor.
The letter also stated that two years later in 1992, that Oak Park
Heights and Stillwater had consulted and would be willing to consider the
southern or central alignments of the Southern corridor.
Proposals for the new river crossing had shown three different corridors
running off an extension of Highway 36.
The final EIS also did not consider the Central Corridor, and the
removal of the seldom used railroad tracks to make a Central corridor to the
river crossing more viable.
Another point made, which has become a political sore spot by other
elected officials, is that the size of the bridge will encourage the sprawl of
Minnesota residents and businesses into Wisconsin rather than solving the
current traffic problem.
"The Final EIS fails to evaluate the entire impact of the proposed
alignment," was the next point of contention in the letter.
One of the most controversi~ elements of the northern most route of
the Southern corridor is the visual impact it would have on the Oak Park
Heights residents who live next to the river.
Having the bridge cross the river at a northerly angle would destroy a
scenic view ortheriv~valley that residents by'the river have invested in.
In the samebreatb; it appears that the visual impacts on the Minnesota
side of the bridge ,were considered less important than the impacts on
farmland, topography and wetlands on the Wisconsin side.
According to a MnDOT origin destination traffic study in 1993, one-
third of all traffic from Wisconsin crossing into Minnesota had a
destination within Stillwater. '
Oak Park Heights staff questioned if the final EIS had failed to evaluate
where that traffic was going "and if the proposed bridge and corridor would
actually resolve the downtowncongestion in Stillwater. .
"Many of the impact or-the proposed alignment that are evaluated are
evaluated inadequately," was the third problem outlined by the letter.
. The letter concluded that the Cover Park neighborhood will be isolated
by the bridge construction. A majority of the residences will be removed
next to the park and the, Beach Road overpass that conn~cts the
neighborhood the rest of Oak Park Heights will be eliminated. The
neighborhood would loose access to the park from the north.
The last point of the letter was a suggestion from Councilmember Janet
Robert, " ,
In a memo to the rest of the council, she stated along with failing to
evaluate the entire impact of the proposed alignment and failing to consider
other crossing alternatives than the preferred alignment, the EIS ~lso did
not consider the local transportation plants of the city of Oak Park Heights
set forth in a resolution in early 1992.
The conclusion of the Oak Park Heights Council and staff in the letter
was that the EIS 'makes constant references to a balanced decision-making
process, two things were clear. .
First, some criteria were more important than other criteria and an order
of importance was never made, which made adequate and consistent
evaluation of all alternatives impossible.
Finally. Oak Park Heights stated that some communities are more
important than others.
The letter stated: It ...it is obvious that wen the hopes and dreams of all
the communities involved in this process were evaluated, that those of Oak
Park Heights were given the least consideration."
In another bridge related note, the area's design review committee has
suggested that for safety and noise concerns and four foot high barrier
should be used all the way across the bridge instead of a barrier of 2-feet, 8-
inches.
....'
development along the
banks.
".1
n ver S
..... ., ..... ...-.-..- -........-
.e
e
--- '-----.r- ~ -- .....
-
e
e
f(~~ .4t-~i-
allJp~ ~~~
1:: ~I,R~, ~ J.31 l?f5
44J-~ . .
;;U; ~~ .
'7' <{ & "",J.- d.r #-. ~~.....<& LP.o4 ~ ~ &f ~.u;,
~ ~ ~~ CL- ~,-Q~ ~ 3t>TL, ;t'4-J ~ (~t2J~ 7: V.
c..A&- ~ I~ f u~ :d ~ Ia.J. c-d ~. l(--.:d.."..t t *
~? <L- ~ p~. a&.t-.#'. ~ 4 l-<>>4- h<4 t #.k
-~. ~~.tM~-20 ~~r;r-(-,,:w1'~~
~jzqri1rt~. ~k-~~-4d~~~~
.~ ~ ft:z C5Y~ Pa.-vl ~1- ~ ~
vrbC/p~~ ~~ ~iJ-~-I.5-~
~~ ~~,~~.diti~V~~NbT
~"-F ""u ;)~~ &71~~~.oM~
~ ~~~;d~~~~~t~
~ ~ ~:tk~~._:tU- ~~:
~a--,J.P..,.A/{o~ H h ~ xl.. ~~!
(J-& p~ ~ ~ ~ C4jf ~ i PcfA/i~ ~~r;
~1A;k ~~~ ~ ~4'-~)U-M ~9#L~~~
~~6> ~ ll-~~)4Jr~~~~!
~1-1W2-a. .ft.Rk._,~_lck-tM) I::~ ~~ ;Z~4~
~.:Mek~~~ ~~,~&~f~~~~k
4r r ~ 1- ~ to <iL L 't-&, ./4 aH>iM?.-u..r kr~)
d--r3- ~~~~ k.d..~ 1"-~~(aJ-tM-~
~ A-i "-- ~. ~ ~ ~ !:J-~ ~ ~~-.. F",,&..dr-
~ !.r - =tJ.. ~ ~IL ~ ~ ~ t:..""..,~ Ad, ~
~.~:I:k lJL~ c-/7t4-~ ~J~l-~)~~~, r-ttt~
~ .k ~ fJz. f/.fG? ~~~, ~ ~~}:ti..t~~
~ iJ-. tm- H.. )Jz~/ tY'l ~ ~n-1i~.
~ '1'-&. t:4 a,P ~ ~ L ~ --6t. 8-t'" d....Jl ~
~ &.../. 1'''''''- 'trO~ tU- 4J 4.} ~ ~ /.vd.-4 ~~.
~ ~[9-al r?tt,b~ ~4-~ ~ l\L~ /i::~
~ c;t/.....p~,~ T!:!.E! ~.P~/(lITS ~ PRIVATJiiE T!sN~L"PERS ~ ~
~ ,n.-,JLt:. ~ ~ LfSV~Plffa.. Hv>- ONLy ~~.~ ~a1tP~/U2~.)~t4-.
jI"""''-'VV-'' J ,_
(~~)
-~- ~/~
~ / If,
M, r~~r~~~.{~.~' ~1-f/-
~ i~ ~ ~ --<- [tL.... -*r).-..~~l ~ ~.
· .&.~ ~ A-~ -d ;;;:. ~ ~ :iia It.L-~1 e
r ~ ~ .";~ -~ ::::r; :l ~'f-~~~Ut$i>
e~ 4-.WAl-L tf ~'-\.~ U1~~~~lrn.~
'JL~~.~, ~~ ~~~~~~~
~~ .to L~. ?ldi.,MJ;tk ~ ~ tML ~ ~
~~ ...,... ~ #t fr) ~ .#.. ~ d /~~ ~
~~~~,~~~,
'1'.t... ~ '1 A.J- f:': /~ ~ "1-~ ~ ~
tI.- ~ ~ &: C<tkIt~4.::.o:d.. DNJ..Y ~ ~ ~
~ #9~ ~ ~r'F4lb);t;tIJ ~~.#'-r5' C t-~ tA.-
I C..ME ~ I}P l ~ ''If ~ ~ ~ hat ~ · 7~ 7 ~
~~~(5)'J.~fh-i~ ~~~ ~.to~,
~~ ~iJk~h:~1J=:P~~~).IJ-~
u~ ~iI:e-~~r~~~~
~ ~~~~tl~J(~~;tI-d~~
~-.t-~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~#o-~~tk
~~t(!}~. u-~~~~~~tIv.-
-Uf! :t;- 'fJ&-.::t. ()
~~ h~~_ ~ z.- ~"!/~i~~.'
4!;;:;:; :Ii ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~....-.~:.....
~ ~<f~ ~ lIVJ~:-'-.
.. cr~M~ ~ ~~.t:/.4 crwL-~(~
~ ~ w~ ~ ~ ~52- ~ ~ ~4'1ltJ A-~
1k~ v--'& ~ - _ r~ a.... -- . -~T ~~ ~,J ~I'~.
~J:~"~fl~~~-n. ~~7f4~~/~
.--,~. ~~~~~#~~"
~ .<t~ 't-.....Jt) -.& ~114.fL~ P.wL~. Jf~
r ~~~) d~J.J.-~ z:ku.k--k~~~~ ar~
at-~) d-~-) -.c... J~ tL.'-'<E- 6J~ /I~'\~.~~. "
,\ ~ ---~ ~ 1#--~{>,.J.~~~;;"'~~
/~ f
~.i. J./.<.t ...t- ~-,d.,. ~ ~~.
~ ~~~~ 4"8 ~J':-~<<'~~ ~ L~M~~~
;tf.uv.;j~{).iM.~ ~~ ~~~' If: ~th}~~ UiVSIs;.#TLY~fJ1t-~J.~
~ W.. ~" 1 ~~"k-~~C~~
M'\. ~ ) ~ t:l1ttb'U- <hi. ~1)..i4 ~~.:t/..:..~ ~ffi ~ . I ~.
Overlooked sprawl issues: Who pays, who gains?
Land use issues across the
country have become more
and more contentious. Property
rights activists are colliding with
environmentalists at nearly every
level of government. And the dire
warnings from both sides tax the
patience of any concerned observ-
er who has not bought into the
unyielding positions of these pro-
tagonists.
However, some of the most sig-
nificant consequences of our cur-
rent land use policies have been
largely overlooked in the debate. These are the fiscal
consequences.
Minnesota, in particular, has not even begun to get its
collective feet wet when exploring the costs of continu-
ing on the path of sprawling cities, unplanned rural
areas, failing septic systems, contaminated groundwa-
ter, unmaintained core cities and suburbs, and unending
appetite for roads, roads, roads.
Although Minnesota has done a poor job of analyzing
fiscal impacts of growth, we cannot be all that different
from every other place that has looked into those costs.
PAMELA
NEARY
GUEST COLUMNIST
· An issue on our editorial board's agenda this
year is urban sprawl. Specifically, we are aiming
"to promote a change in incentives that now en-
courage or accommodate devel-
opment farther and farther from
this region's core."
These two columns address
the impact of urban sprawl. Some
readers of the Neal Peirce column
no doubt will remember that
Archbishop John R. Roach of St.
Paul and Minneapolis, in a
speech last October, expressed
similar concerns about unbal-
anced patterns of development as Bishop Antho-
ny Pilla of Cleveland. - The Editor
In California, even the Bank of America - a well-re-
spected internationa) business - has opted to become
involved in the issues of sprawl, largely because it has
become too costly to ignore.
In the cover letter for a report entitled "Beyond
Sprawl: New Patterns of Growth to Fit the New Cali-
rf\r.:JC\:~ t\\\J)\~ " (\'<}\~J)r CLrA
<,.1.1\\' \." \~,- n j. \ \'1(" \ ('i\\:JJ,.,\')1J', '..
..~'\ \. '..}...)'..., v ~v vI. ..\
fl'. " _l~~"l.,c,..\~.,'V\", JI,'\.. \
v.( >\t}X .'. \ '-'.
e
fornia," the bank and its coauthors wrote, "Unfettered
sprawl will make the state less competitive, burden
taxpayers with higher costs, degrade the environment
and lower the quality of life for every Californian.
Ironically, unchecked sprawl has shifted from an engine
of California's growth to a force that now threatens to
inhibit growth and degrade the quality of our life."
When proposing changes to land use patterns, one i
often hears concerns about whether some landowners
will have reduced values or some developers reduced
profits if new'planning ideas are adopted.
Although these are valid concerns, we should also ask
the equally important question, "What will we as tax-
payers be required to pay if we try to maintain those
. values and profits?"
If we don't know the answer to that question, we
can't do a fair cost-benefit analysis of our policies.
Simply because changes to land values and develop-
ment profits are more easily computed does not mean
they should become the overriding consideration.
A recent Pioneer Press article about the Washington
County comprehensive planning process quoted the re-
actions of a local town board member from New Scan-
dia. Although perhaps not representative of all local
officials, his response was certainly illuminating re-
garding what he perceived his role to be in setting land
use policies in his community.
When questioned about plans for a new concept
called density-based zoning, this board member opposed
them by saying, "Developers say there's more money to
be made from eight five-acre lots than from four
lO-acre lots."
:S~~
~ ~ o/;A3/1J
e
What do developer profits have to do with planning
the future of our communities? No doubt many could
make a tidy profit if allowed to convert their lands to
commercial or high-density uses, but it wouldn't neces-
sarily be good for their communities.
Curt Johnson, the chairman of the Metropolitan Coun-
cil, noted in a recent talk on growth management that
we haven't adequately explored the costs of our growth
patterns, but preliminary studies have shown that for
every dollar of tax growth on the edge, there are
multiple dollars of costs imposed on those already
there. In spite of that, growth is often hailed as the
savior to the problem of rising property taxes.
If growth truly reduces property tax burdens, then
one would expect to see the taxes going down in grow-
ing communities. In fact, communities such as Wood-
bury, Eagan and Maple Grove have all experienced
increasing tax rates in spite of their rapidly expanding
tax base. Is there a 'single Minnesota taxpayer who has
seen a reduction in their property taxes as a result of
the growth in their community?
Paul Tischler, a nationally known expert on fiscal
impacts, noted that often overlooked costs are opera-
tional, not capital.
In other words, building the roads, schools and sewers
to service our sprawl will only be the tip of the. iceberg.
We should stop fooling ourselves that the land use
debate is about tax base. It isn't. It's,about profits and
who will pay for them, and about the 'quality of life we
are building into our future.
We should all realize by now that the growth we have
allowed in the past is simply not sustainable. Before the
passage of the Washington State growth management
act, officials in King County (home to Seattle) analyzed
their growth pattern. In the past 20 years, their popu-
lation had increased 38 percent, land conversion had
increased 84 percent, and vehicle miles traveled h~d
increased 135 percent.
How can we insure the quality of the future with
practices like that? The cost of maintaining the neces-
sary roads is in itself overwhelming. '.
Other considerations such as ground water contamI-
nation open space preservation, quality communities,
afford~ble housing and farmland preservation are im-
portant elements in the land use debate.
But a greater understanding of the costs will be
crucial for enabling the public to become more mean-
ingfully involved, The time is ripe to expand the conten-
tious debate surrounding land use patterns to one of
more careful evaluation of the costs of maintaining the
status quo.
We owe ourselves and our kids better judgment and
better fiscal practices than we have shown in the past.
Neary is a former DFL state legiSlator. Afton.
e
e
Chair:
Aaenda:
Minutes:
Treasurer:
Attorney:
Planner:
Enaineer:
Public Works:
Clerk:
Committees:
Stillwater Township
May 25,1995
Johnson
7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting
adopt
approve minutes - May 11, 1995
1. Report, checks/claims
1. Fundingsland Variance
2. Wahlin Outlot Deeds
3. Update Rivard
4. Update Jacobsen violations
1. Wahlin Grading Permit
2. Streets and Trails Specs.
3. Outline budget for patching and overlay
1. Report Carlson arbitration
2. Stonebridge Trail- J. Hicks
1. Presidential Primary
PeoDle - 8:30 PM C. Mullen - Land Preservation
Old Business:
New Business:
Note:
Steve Nelson and Mike Gair will not be present
F ~~ "
~. r ~ /f
... .
May 20, 1995
Pat Bantli
Unit~d States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
.- -
- .
May 18, 1995
ST. CROIX NATIONAL SCENIC RIVERWAY
P.O. BOX 708
ST. CROIX FALLS, WISCONSIN 54024
.1'1 JUtPLY una TO:
N50(SACN)
If''.;; ~..LI!f./ I
':, ... 1,1
-,~ U
Dear Partnership Member:
Thank you for your past participation in the Zebra Mussel
Conservation Partnership Program on the St. Croix National Scenic
Ri verway. Thi s program has been an important part of the Zebra
Mussel Response Plan, and will continue to be an integral part of
our efforts to protect the Riverway.
After much discussion and consideration of many alternatives, it
was decided that a conditional boat access restriction would best
protect the St. Croix. The Arcola Sandbar was chosen as the
restricted access point only after various additional alternative
si tes were discussed and explored. This implementation of the
restricted access point is the only major change in the zebra
mussel program for 1995, which continues to include information and
education, remediation, and monitoring and research.
Upstream travel beyond the restricted access at the Arcola Sandbar
will not be allowed unless one of the three following conditions
has been met: the boater presents a pass issued to riparian owners
between the High Bridge and Arcola Sandbar who agree to take
precautions to prevent the spread of zebra mussels; the boater
presents a day pass (val id one day only) issued to boaters who
launch above the Arcola Sandbar or residents north of the sandbar;
or the boater presents a certification of decontamination issued at
approved decontamination stations. Changes to the plan and
restricted access may occur in the event of zebra mussel
contamination.
If you wish to continue as a Partnership member or you would like
a complete copy of the 1995 Zebra Mussel Response Plan, please
contact the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway at the above address
or call (715) 483-3284.
Thank you for your time and continued support.
Sincerely,
~n;:n~
~ Superintendent
t
UJed 1
e
8:00 am 0 9:30 am
Coffee Break
IIgSffiaJnSl
. START THE DAY
KOLLINER'S
MENSWEAR
WITH FRIENDS '
- 9JO'G nE ~ /fa SH:E 1SIll -
~_~~~t:'.~I~~
CIlYOF STll.LWATER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
JUNE
COFFEE BREAK & MIXER
. 1 ue 20
5:00 pm c 6:30.pm
~. mixer:
~ ei~f1arre& 310,5 main St
, Fi~ Art Galbies. Ltd.
. O!<C."~!ar.'Z'<<t:-...,.
.;,
END THE DA Y
WITH GOOD CHEER
e
~~ i', "'I
~
+~
~
Z ....... e
R P ~~
GRlllRllS l I O.
~~
CAPIZ GALJ~E]lIES
Brlllgs You TIle Worlcl of Art
C apiz Galleries offers you an adventure into the world of art.
Here you'll find the finest quality in orginal, contemporary
and nautical art, fme art prints, limited edition graphics, and
signed and numbered lithographs by internationally known artists.
We also have bronze sculpture and the best selection of aircraft art in
the Midwest.
Whether a browser or collector, you'll be impressed with Capiz
Galleries' collections, paintings, and graphics. Among our artists:
Michael Parkes, Steve Hanks, Alen Hunt, John Mecray, Michael
Blaser and Robert Taylor. Our relaxed, friendly atmosphere will add
delight to your visit \\<ithin our spacious and contemporary gallery. In
addition, we offer:
T Custom/Creative Framing
v Framing Accessories
..,. Selection of Mouldings
T Art Installation & Delivery
T Talented Design Staff
..,. Original Paintings
T VISA & Mastercard
accepted
We invite you to visit Capiz Galleries for yourself. Meet us.
Wander amid our collections. Discover the world of art. Or call to
make a special appointment. We're located in one of the many
historic landmark buildings on North Main Street in Stillwater.
120A NORTH MAIN STREET... STILLWATER, MN 55082... 612439-5670
. . .. - .~
ei
PLEASE JOIN US WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1995 FOR OUR MIXER FROM 5-6:30.
e
SlDith Broadcasting COlDpany, Inc.
104 North Main Street
StIllwater, Minnesota 55082
612/439-5006. FAX 612/439-5015
HOMETOWN SHOPPING
IN HISTORIC STILL WATER
Now, more than ever, small businesses & communities need their citizens to shop at
home.
Unforgettable Radio - AM 1220 WIMN is proud to introduce you to a brand new
advertising campaign titled "Hometown Shopping in Historic Stillwater!" The campaign
stresses the importance of supporting local business by shopping at home! To hear the
musical theme of "Hometown Shopping in Historic Stillwater", please call Annelise
Hoerchler or Dan Smith at WlMNRadio: 612/439-5006.
To be a part of ''Hometawn Shopping in Historic Stillwater," simply take part in one of
WIMN's Hometown advertising plans. Here's what you receive:
PLAN A
Ten -- Fifteen second Hometown Shopping ads each week.
Your Investment: $25.00/weeklv
(13 week minimum)
PLAN B
Become a member ofWIMN's Touchdown or Sportscaster Clubs (please call
WIMN for a description of these plans) and receive membership in our
Hometown Shopping Club at no additional charge. A weekly value of $25.00
Ten -- Fifteen second Hometown Shopping ads each week - No charge.
*Your Investment: $595.00 or $380.00/monthlv
(6 month minimum)
e
ROS daypart. Billed weekly or monthly. Updates are limited. .Based on individual plan.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
,
JOBS CORNER.
The following "jobs" are in need of a volunteer to carry out their destiny.
Some require a lot of time, some very little. See if you can find.something
that fits your schedule and talents and CALL TODAY. Your help is needed.
e
CERTIFICATE DELIVERY: COSCC membership certificates need to be
delivered within city limits. 2-4 deliveries/month. Call Diane Rollie
430-3630.
ENVELOPE STUFFERS: stuff and label mailers. 2-3 hours/mo--less with
group help! Call Susan smith 439-4134.
REPORTERS: Need writers and reporters for qrtly newsletter. 1-6
hours/qtr. Call Susan smith 439-4134.
BLOCK CAPTAINS: pass information from the Chamber to other businesses
on your block. 1-2 hours/mo. Call Stephanie Iverson 433-5107.
ROLODEX ORGANIZER: create phone rolodex for COSCC--all supplies/labels
provided. 3-5 hours. Call Janel Belz 439-1023.
COPIES: need person "on call" to make copies of mailer info at st
Croix Office. 1-2 hours each time. Call Susan smith 439-4134.
MAN THE BEER WAGON: over 21? want to pour beer at events throughout
the summer? Need folks for Music on the Waterfront, Book & Antique
Fest, Fall Art Fair and more. Call Loann Stokes 439-0921.
FLAPJACKS: volunteers needed for pancake breakfast during Lumberjack
Days. Call Dave Peterson 439-0036.
TELEMARKETERS: needed to follow-up mailers for COSCC brochure ad
inserts. Call Janel Belz 439-1023.
FALL COLORS ART FAIR: we are looking for volunteers for everything
from park set-up top to supervision, hospitality for artists, manning
Chamber Booth, park clean-up and whatever else you can think off.
Call Loan Stokes 439-0921.
***************
WE NOW HAVE AN OFFICIAL OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN STILLWATER
CHAMBER OFFICE: need office coverage seven (7) days a week, 4 hour
blocks (monring and afternoons) to answer phones, stuff mailers, lite
office. We will train! Call stephanie Iverson 433-5107.
REMEMBER--
OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS e
UPON YOUR HELP
~ -
. ~ -,
'JIIIIIIIT .' .'
. 1_ __ _ _ __ _I_~ - .1___ ~__- _ _1_--------1- -- --- -- -1- -~ - -"- --~--------- J
CrfYoFSTILLWATER CHAMBER OF CO~RCE
OFFICERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MAY 22, 1995
DIANE ROLLIE
PRESIDENT
MULBERRY PT ANTIQUES
430-3630
DAVE PETERSON
PAST PRESIDENT
WATER MUSIC
439-0036
SUSAN SMITH
VICE-PRESIDENT
VITAL SYSTEMS INC
439-4134
DONNA TARRAS
SECRETARY
LEO NEUMAN
TREASURER
JANEL & DAVID BELZ
TOURISM & MKTG
INFORMATION MGT
KRISTIN KLEMETSRUD SAVORIES
VOLUNTEERS, RECRUITMENT
BEAUTIFICATION & IMAGE
NORTH HILL CATERING
351-0654
LEO NEUMAN CPA
439-5990
JDB FLORIST
439-1023
430-0702
VERN STEFAN ST CROIX OFFICE
ECONOMIC DEV
BUSINESS MIX
JIM LASKIN JP LASKIN
GOV'T RELATION
POLITICAL AFFAIRS
439-1801
439-5712
LOANN STOKES STOKES JEWELRY
DEANNA ZINK DEANNA ZINK ANTIQUES
EVENTS, PROMOTIONS
FUNDRAISERS & OUTINGS
439-0921
770-1987
GENE "TACO" BEALKA
LUMBER BARON HOTEL
FLYNN COMPANIES
LUTHERAN BROTHERHOOD
CITY COUNCILMAN
430-2653
DUANE HUBBS
JACK CAMPBELL
JERRY MEIER
227-8481
439-5356
439-4387
e
CHERYL KAHOUT
GOOD SAMARITAN
439-7180
ROLAND BUCKMAN
STILLWATER RESIDENT
439-9046
P.O. BOX 516, STILLWATER, MN 55082
PHONE: 612-439-4001 . FAX: 612-439-4513
e
CRLEIDER J
of
EVEnTS
.~
~xrTTl7o,.~~
, L....._.J. .J....... ..1........_1...... ...1.........1_.......1
.. CITYI/fSTIU.WATER CHAMBER 01 COMMERCE
Far IlfomatlOJ OD Klslam Stlllwlter 612..Jg..OOI
mOn 5
IsII 1111.12:88 pm
lDar~ If Ilrectors
Lud.rshlp CORf.ranee
Saulms
11I1.lIiID st.
monl~
unE
Tue 6
',08 '1:80 pm
TII 0 FlRuml PlUIIII S.I1lIAir
L.. C IlIman CPa
... Iln Cmtrg CIIl
15IIlIcluslCk Iud
Tuel3
c
5.'8 ",30pm
III XI r,
128 I. 11m st
.~
. lhur I
~,OO ",00 pm
Z Tn 0 'InanCliI PlannlRY SemlAi
Leo C Duman CPR
hk Slen Country CI.b
1599 mcRaSICk had
Thur 8
.,U 0 6,88 pm
TII 0 FIUDml Plnnlnl SlmlDAr
Lee C DeuIDu CPA
Oa. Bien Cmtrl CI..
1m IIcluSICk Road
ThurlS
1:0.09,11,. S:JIplI",DDpm
III' FIUBCIIUluDll1 SemlBlr Bur' of Directors llleetlnl
Lee C leulBu CPa Suoms
.d IIIB Cmtrg CI.. 108 D III aID st
151111cluSICk Iud
...10 &:II pm
T.. 0 FlRuml PlaDmB Seminar
L.. C Beumu CPA
lik Sin Cmtry Club
1511 mchSICk Rud
11111111\ III,
5.30 · 1:00pm
Board Df Directors /lleellng
Sauoms m 31
108 D. /IIalD st a Y
lOed 1
8,01 am' 9,30 am
Coffee Break.
III S lIIiID 5t
KOLLINER's
NII\!SWIIAR
-UlG1Ill.-_IfG_-
lOedlq
fh 2 Sat r Sun q
5 till w at e r 800 k 0 n n t I que Fe s t I U a I
t.lU 1II,lukSI1811,'lruHul
8 00 IIltb Pllrlcll~lhnsOl IZ,II pi '1,11 pi
B' ~Bm k R t SlCrlllhh,urluhohtllm UaUnrllOkSIIt,l..kCnhr
are 00 UC lun II.UUaI..I,UDpl hh,1I51'11I.lkS.'I.'III5l
Stillwater Buh Center UuUmB..kSII.,hokCnhr Duu..rr..d Ful,.1II 5L
ZZg 5. maiD St.. Rah,uSI'tllllkSlle,laiaSt 5.llpl:
DaUnrr... Fut..e,a Sl. I'll' Chm ImptlOl
IZ:lU pll, hUm Cmert 5t Crill hll,ulrllllllheUm
Frntof 51111111tar Ink Cutar m 5..11I 5L
PrIg
Sat 10
Sunil
Frl16
5:00pm
Deadline for Items on
July Calendar.
Contact
Susan5mlth
qJgoqlH
SunlB
Sat 11
Father's
Day
,mOn 19 lue ~O lOed 21 lhur 22 Frl23 Sat 24 Sun 25
5.11 pm 0 6,31 pm
b m""
q:OD pm ...Frmct ]10 5lD4ID 5t ~,08 0 5,00 pm
Brand Opening F'~Art GaIleris, LId. TII 0 'Inanclal PlanDIDI Snllna
Bud Samaritan -.-""'"
1.8001,81 ,. Leo C Deuman CPR
IIlg n Owens TII 0 FIIlICIII "IDDIDI SemlAlr hk Glen Country Club
Lee C IlImll CPa 1m mchSICk Rud
hk lien Cmtrl Cluk
1m IIchslck Iud
mOD 26 Tue 21 lOed28 Thur29 Frl30 Enjoy The Victorian Experience
11111. III"g Tour the 1863 Territorial Prison Warden's Home and Museum
IlIhl . Jill Is leu lI..tr All Dag III Day . Jane Is ImlDlolk' 602 N Main St Stillwater Mn 612-.439-5966
St"'1 hr tnr free rm Slap ID Fer\urfru rill ...
. ~Il" Is Bose .!lnU. m Fllml II . June Is BaSI month" "June Is RDsa month" m Fllml td ,;;i~ May 1 . Oct 31
Step 'I far lur free rISe SISII.us stop 18 for \ourfreerose stop JD for \UlIr free rose 515111J1DS . , ~ 2..a pm 1\.Ie, Thur, Sat & Sun
UI F10tlSt LU 1.1101.11 '11 JOB FIDrlst t. JaB Florist td ~ $2.00 Adults ~t't> '
5158 D.,BI . luo FlIilClal "aIlID. SI.lur SIS Ill8ens 515 BOwens 5,11' ',11 pm I: '. ~I~ '~ $1.00 Students 6-17
Lu C lei II II en Burd If "reelers IIl1l1n, ;.: ; J:1.~ , . .~~ Children under 6 Free .... It)
~~.-.
Ilk 11n Ceutr, Clu~ SUDms ~. ''''-''
1IIIIIIInSI Owned .nd opoNtod by tIIo
1m IIcluSICk Iud WuhlngtDn County Hlstorto.1 Sooloty 1........~~
-----