HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-07-15 CC Packet
REVISED AGENDA **
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 97-17
Stillwater Public Library, 223 N. 4th Street
July 15, 1997
.~
__ SPECIAL MEETING
., REGULAR MEETING
.
.
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Workshop: Local Access Network
2. Workshop: 5-year CIP
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
ROLL CALL
APPROV AL OF MINUTES - July 1, 1997, Regular and Recessed Meetings and Executive Session
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. John and Marguerite Rheinberger - Request for City participation for sesquicentennial
commemoration of the August 26, 1848, Territorial Convention
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum is a portion of the Council meeting to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the
meeting agenda. The Council may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff
regarding investigation of the concerns expressed.
CONSENT AGENDA *
1. Resolution 97-157: Directing Payment of Bills.
2. Contractors Licenses: Paragon Pools, Willernie, MN; Bald Eagle Siding, LLC, Vadnais Heights,
MN; MCL,LLC, (General Contractor), Eau Claire, WI; D & H Construction, Coon Rapids MN
3. Hang banners: United Way - September 8-0ctober 31, Che~tnut St.; City of Stillwater Chamber -
of Commerce, Fall Colors Art Fair, September 22-0ctober 5.
4. Peddlers Permits: Frederick Kalinoff, farm produce at Greeley & Pine; David Engebretson, farm
produce, 4th & Orleans
5. Authorization to begin Lily Lake Beach picnic area and walkway improvements
6. Resolution 97-158: Employment of Sarah Hamilton as part-time lifeguarq
7. Cost Sharing for Brown's Creek Watershed Outlet Monitoring Station ~.
8. Authorization to attend 1. C.B. 0. Annual Business Meeting - Inspection Dept.
9. Resolution 97-159: Agreement with Equipment Supply, Inc, for HVAC preventive maintenance
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
2. Police Chief
3. Public Works Director
4. Community Dev. Director
j. Fire Chief
10. Building Official
11. City Attorney
12. City Coordinator
5. Parks & Recreation
6. City Engineer
7. Consulting Engineer
8. City Clerk
~
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. SUP/97-32. This is the d<!y and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal of the
Planning Commissions decision from Margaret Mitchell for a chiropractic office use in a
residential district, 1055 W. St. Croix Avenue. Notice of the hearing was 'placed in the Stillwater
Gazette on July 3, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
City Council Meeting 97-17
July 15, 1997
2. Croixwood Boulevard Street Rehabilitation Project, Job No. 9724. This is the day and time for
the public hearing to consider the making of a street rehabilitation improvement on Croixwood
Boulevard between County Road 5 to Northland Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, ~
Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is
properties abutting Croixwood Boulevard between County Road 5 to Northland Boulevard. ,,'
Estimated cost of improvements is $130,000. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater
Gazette on July 3, 1997, and July 11, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
3. Case No. V/97-28. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a request for a
variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 15'3" requested) for construction of a two
story, 2000 sq. ft. addition to an existing single family residence at 2318 Boom Road in the RA,
One Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland Overlay District. William C. Messner,
applicant. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on June 20, 1997, and notices
mailed to affected property owners. (Continued from 7/1/97; request to continue to 8/15/97)
.,
4. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider the reconveyance of the west 1/2 of Lot
4, Sunnyslope Lane property to Washington County. Notice of the hearing was placed in the
Stillwater Gazette on June 20, 27 and July 3 and 11, 1997.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Second reading of ordinance amending the zoning ordinance by changing zoning classification of
newly annexed land.
2. Approval of AUAR/Mitigation Plan
NEW BUSINESS
1. Approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids, Croixwood Boulevard
Street Rehabilitation, Job No. 9724
.
2. Request for emergency repair work - Hazel Street Ravine
3. First reading of ordinance amending City Code, Chapter 29, Sewer Service Charges
4. First reading of ordinance amending City Code, Chapter 30, Garbage and Rubbish
5. First reading of ordinance amending City Code, Sale of Tobacco Products
6. Consideration of Phase I environmental study - Aiple property
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/REQUESTS
1. James Laskin, City of Stillwater Chamber of Commerce - Request for letter of endorsement for
historic directional signs
COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
.
* All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which
event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately.
** Items in italics are additions to the agenda
-
.
I.
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Memorandum
Mayor and C:uncil,1
Marcy Cocdett It..
July 15, 1997
Proposal for Local Area Network
On FriClay, July 11, the Council received a proposal for a City Hall local area network prepared
by Imagineering, Inc., which included a detailed listing of the City's networking goals, the
network infrastructure designed by Imagineering to achieve those goals, and the associated costs.
Attached to this memo is also a summary outline of the same proposal for Council reference and
for discussion purposes during this evening's presentation by Imagineering, Inc.
.
.
.
City of Stillwater Proposal for City Hall Local Area Network
A.
Comprehensive networking plan for City Hall (including police and fire)
· Cabling for a local area network was installed during city hall construction.
· LAN provides for sharing of and easier access to data/info between staff and all
departments.
· All second and third floor staff (except receptionist) included in network plan
...
· Two workstations each for Police and Fire Departments (Police access limited for
now to Chief and Captain)
B. Washington County Connectivity
· Access to County AS400 and GIS information
· Access through County to Internet and Internet e-mail
· Use of Washington County fire wall for protection of City networked data.
.
T-1 connection to County data systems (AS400 and GIS information) installed
July, 1997.
C. Computer Workstation Upgrades
· Bandwidth and software upgrades require minimum p.c. configuration:
486/66, 32 mg memory, with substantial hard drive.
· All current p.c.' s less than 3 years old recycled into network..
· New workstations budgeted for p.c.'s more than three years old.
D.
Software Upgrades and Standardization
,..
.~
· Standardization of all software to Win95 and Microsoft Office, with training.
· Network licensing should reduce software costs overtime.
· Staff Training to ensure optimal use of technology
E.
Future
. Resident Access and Interactivity
. Network Dial-in Access
F. Cost
1. Cost Summary by type of expenditure:
..,
Network Infrastructure - Servers/Data Center
(servers, routers, network software)
$37,510
Network Infrastructure (Floors 1 - 3)
$ 9,641
Software (Win95 & MS Office)
$ 5,340
Personal Computer Upgrades
$ 520
Personal Computer Replacements
$25,622
$ 4,OOQ<
$30,260
AS400 Connectivity and Access
Consulting Services
(install and configure data center and floors 1 - 3)
Staff Training (network and software)
$ 6.000
Total
$118,893
(Note: the total represents a small change from the previously submitted proposal. The estimates
for the Finance AS400 connectivity have been reduced by half, and the Imagineering total
inadvertently omitted costs for staff training. The net result is reflected in the above total).
.. Financing
.
.
.
.
.
!.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Marcy Cordes, Administrative Assi~ I J I
July 11, 1997 "7W
From:
Date:
Re: Local Area Network Proposal
Back~ound
Beginniftg in the Fall of 1996, I have, with the assistance of Barb White, and Imagineering, Inc.,
held both formal and informal interviews with key staff from various City departments on their
computer networking needs. This provided staff with an opportunity to define their information
sharing and data needs, and to outline the obstacles that exist in the current technology environment.
More recently, on May 3, 1997, the Council approved the selection of Imagineering, Inc. to provide
a comprehensive networking plan for City Hall, to be implemented after completion of the
construction. Council may recall that the cabling for a new computer network was included in the
original design for the City Hall renovation, and is now fully installed.
The Imagineering design proposal, attached for your review, provides an overview of the
information and technology goals of the City of Stillwater, in addition to the hardware and software
specifications required to achieve these goals, and the related costs. The plan provides for network
access and information sharing between most of the staff in the Administration, Finance,
Engineering, Planning, and Inspection Departments. The Police Department has been limited to two
networked workstations, for the Chief and Captain. This will provide immediate access to e-mail
and shared data to Police Department management, and provide them with an opportunity to
evaluate whether additional users should be added at a future date. Two workstations in the Fire
Department can also be added to the City wide network at relatively little expense.
Mel Jahnke, our lead consultant from Imagineering, will be making a presentation to Council on the
design specifications for this network at the July 15 Council meeting. In addition, I have used the
remainder of this memo to elaborate on some of the more significant benefits of bringing City Hall
on to a local area network, and the reasoning behind some of the design decisions.
Information Sharing
After discussions with various department staff, it became clear that they have a pressing need to
share information between co-workers and other department staff. A major advantage of LAN's is
the flexibility they provide in resource sharing. Computer networks facilitate group cooperation
because information from one workstation can be shared with other workstations anywhere in the
building, or beyond, if necessary.
For example, Administration will be able provide desktop access to all networked staffto the City
Code, past minutes of Council meetings, resolutions, Personnel Policies, and labor contracts. As
our Geographic Information Systems (GIS) capabilities continue to be expanded and developed by
the City and the County, a computer network can facilitate the use of this data by all departments to
enhance services to residents. In fact, the City has already made a significant investment in
specialty softwares, e.g., software to maintain and automate inspection records and Council minutes,
and in the Development of the City's Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The highest and best
of these software programs cannot be fully achieved without the installation of a City Hall wide
network.
Washington County Connectivity
There is a substantial amount of data residing on the Washington County AS400, and more
significantly, in the County's GIS system, which is used by several City departments. As previously
mentioned, the City's need for expanded and updated GIS data will likely increase over time. On
May 30, 1997, Council approved the purchase and installation of a data T -1 connection between the
City and the Washington County, which will provide immediate, high-speed transfer of data
between the two entities, once a City Hall network is in place.
""l
This connectivity will also allow the City to obtain relatively inexpensive Internet access and
Internet e-mail. Typically, the use of the Internet raises significant security issues for any
organization that has data stored on a local area network. Most organizations install a "firewall," a
security device that can cost as much as $10,000. However, our T -1 connection will allow us to use
the County as a conduit for City Internet access, while using the County firewall as protection for
the City's networked data, eliminating the need for a separate firewall investment.
Software Upgrades and Standardization
Currently, City staff is working on a variety of word-processing and spreadsheet and database
programs. The Network proposal recommends standardization of software for all networked
workstations. After interviews with staff to determine their needs and concerns for software, we
have determined that a City wide upgrade to Windows 95 and Microsoft Office 97 will best meet
the needs of staff, while providing more sophistication and greater options than they currently have
on their existing software packages.
Software costs can also be substantially reduced by buying network packages rather than individual
copies. Programs installed over the network provide for easier administration and monitoring of
copyright compliance. Specialty or department-specific softwares will, for now, continue to be
purchased separately by department.
I have also included in the Imagineering proposal projected costs for training of all networked staff
on the basics of Win95 and Microsoft Office. The estimate is based on the discounted on-site group
training rates previously negotiated between the County and FirstStaff, a computer software training
group. Additional advanced training for key staff may be available in this budget, or purchased
separately by department.
Cost
The cost that has been projected by Imagineering for the implementation of the City's local area
network includes estimates for equipment purchases, services for installation of hardware and
software, and an upgrade of the Finance AS400 to allow for networked access, in addition to the
training of staff on software and network design. Imagineering does not sell equipment; the
estimates provided for computers and other network hardware are based on the state contract. Staff
will bid out all equipment after approval of this design. Future yearly expenses for service and
maintenance of the network, and monthly service fees for access through Washington County to the
.
.
.
.
.
i.
Internet and Internet e-mail have not been included in this proposal. Additional information on the
proposed financing for this project will be provided to Council before the July 15 meeting.
Future LAN Opportunities
Once the technology is in place, staff can begin a study of providing improved public access to data
stored on our network, including interactive capability (e.g., performing building permit or licencing
applications electronically). The City's LAN has been designed to focus on the merging of local
area networks and telecommunications. As a result, the City will be able to look at providing dial-in
for selected staff to the City's network from any computer outside of City Hall.
Recommendation
Council approval of the implementation of a local area network for Stillwater City Hall, at an
estimated cost of$116,893, as described in the Network Infrastructure Specification prepared by
Imagirie~ring, Inc.
.
.
.
II '
COMPUTER CONSULTANTS
..,
Network Infrastructure
Specification
Prepared for:
The City of Stillwater
.
Network Infrastructure Specification
Goals
"ll
After interviews with Barb White and Marcy Cordes, the following were
determined to be the key goals that must be met to ensure that the City of
Stillwater's 3-5 year Information Technologies (IT) plan to will provide the
foundation to keep pace with the technical demands of doing business in the
future:
. Establish connectivity between departments to share data and other
networked resources.
. Connection to the City's AS/400 via the Ethernet backbone to allow
department heads to access departmental budgeting data and employee
master files.
. Connection to Washington County's network to access the Arcview/GIS
application.
.
. Connection to Washington County's network to access the County's
AS/400 if needed.
. Connection to the Internet for E-mail and Wodd Wide Web (WWW)
access.
. Centralize applications and data for shared use and backup capabilities.
. Create a combined voice and data network.
.
.
Network Infrastructure Specification
Recommendations
Based on the goals listed above, the following are our recommendations to obtain
them:
.., . Implement Microsoft's Windows NT 4.0 as the Network Operating
System and integrate NT's Exchange (E-mail) and Internet Server's.
. Standardize on File Servers with a minimum configuration as follows:
1. Pentium Pro 200MHz
2. 128M RAM
3. 4G Fault Tolerant Hard Drives
4. Virus Protection
.
. Standardize on Workstations with a minimum configuration as follows:
1. 486/66 MHz
2. 32M RAM
3. 2.0G Hard Drive
4. Windows 95 Operating System
5. MS-Office 97 Software Suite
6. Virus Protection
. Standardize on Microsoft's Outlook E-mail client.
. Standardize on Microsoft's Office 97 Product Suite.
. Install (2) File Servers. One to service the CAD/CAM area and one to
service the Administration, Finance, Police and Fire Departments.
. Install a 100MB switched Ethernet backbone.
. Install 100MB fast Ethernet to the desktop.
. Place the 100MB Ethernet switch and the file servers in the 2nd Floor
computer room (MDF). Place the 100MB Fast Ethernet Hubs in the
respective wiring closets (IDF) on each floor.
.
. Install a Tl circuit to establish connectivity to Washington County's
network.
Recommendations Continued
. Obtain Internet access through the Tl and Washington County's
LAN/WAN.
. Investigate utilizing the County's Internet Firewall vs establishing an
independent fIrewall within the City's Network.
"!!
. Contract Ultimate Data, The City of Stillwater's current AS/400
Contractor, to install and configure the Ethernet Adapter in the AS/400
configure and install Client Access, TCP/IP and TCP/IP pass through
printing.
. Investigate remote access possibilities to the City's network.
. Upgrade all machines to Windows 95 and 32M of RAM
.
.
.'
Klayton E. Shawn A. Tim M. New EE
P90124M New PC P200/64M New PC
~
g gg :p~p
Alan Z. Cindy S. Sheila M.
486/66/32M P166/32M New PC
Inspections
_ of Stillwater
Network Infrastructure
New PC
Upgrade PC
Mise Item to Order
3rd Floor
.
.
Engineering
HP350C
Susan F.
P200/64 486/66132M
Planning
Administration
Nile K. Marcy C. Morli W. Susan T. New EE
New PC P166132M New PC New PC New PC
Q
10/100MB
Jennifer AS/400
P166/16 Line Printer
Finance
George N. HobH. Radio Rm
P166132M P120I32M 486/66/16M
Fire
1st Floor
10/100MB
Police
DonH. TimH.
New PC New PC
- I
City of Stillwater
Network Infrastructure Specification .
Qty Description Unit Cost Ext Cost
Server/Data Center Configuration
2 Compaq Proliant 2500 10000 20000
Intel Pentium Pro Processor
160M RAM I Duplexed 4G HD
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters
2 14" VGA Color Monitor 250 500
1 3Com 8 Port 100MB Switch 2600 2600
1 Cisco 3600 Series Router (Dual LAN 1 Dual WAN) 4000 4000
24 Install, Test, and Configure Router 70 1680
~ Windows NT Server v4.0 wI 10 Client Access Licenses 1000 2000
, 10 Windows NT Client Access Licenses 35 350
1 Exchange Server v5.0 wi 5 Client Access Licenses 1300 1300
25 Exchange v5.0 Client Access Licenses 60 1500
1 Microsoft Proxy Server 1000 1000
2 Tape Backup 1 Backup Software 1 Tapes 2000 4000
32 Server Prep and Configuration 70 2240
1 Project Mgmt, Mileage and Travel 15000 15000
16 Test, Configure and Install Network Hardware 70 1120
1 APC Smart-UPS 1400NET 650 650
1 Windows 95 and MS-Office 97 Training (Estimate) 6000 6000
1 AS/400 Ethernet Upgrade and Services 8000 8000
Total Server/Data Center Configuration $71,940.00 .
Workstation Configurations (3rd Floor) Engineering/Planningllnspections
3 Pentium Pro 200 MHz 2458 7374
32M RAM I 3.2G HD
12X CD ROM I Mulitmedia Kit
17" Montiors
Windows 95
MS-Office 97 Suite
MS-Word / MS-Excel
Outlook / PowerPoint
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters
4.5 Workstation Prep 70 315
4.5 Workstaton Installation 1 LAN/Email Configuration 70 315
1 HP JetDirect EXPlus PrintServer 296 296
1 HP JetDirect EXPlus5 PrintServer 460 460
2 HP JetDirect Card 450 900
5 Install and Configure Print Servers 70 350
4 Windows NT Workstation Upgrade 130 520
12 Install Windows 95 Upgrade 70 840
7 3Com 10/100 Network Interface Cards 159 1113
7 Install and Configure Network Interface Cards 70 490
7 Install and Configure E-Mail Clients 70 490 .
7 MS-Office Standard Edition Competitive Upgrade 200 1400
14 Install MS-Office Standard Edition 70 980
1 3Com 24 Port 10/100MB Fast Ethernet 10Base-T Hub 2500 2500
Total Third Floor $18,343.00
Workstation Configurations (2nd Floor) Administration/Finance
4 Pentium Pro 200 MHz 2458 9832
. 32M RAM / 3.2G HD
12X CD ROM / Mulitmedia Kit
17" Montiors
Windows 95
MS-Office 97 Suite
MS-Word / MS-Excel
Outlook / Power Point
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters
1 Laptop PC (Niles) 3500 3500
8 Workstation Prep 70 560
8 Workstaton Installation / LAN/Email Configuration 70 560
1 HP JetDirect Card 450 450
2 Install and Configure Print Servers 70 140
~ 8"Windows 95 Upgrades 100 800
16 Install Windows 95 Upgrades 70 1120
5 3Com Fast Etherlink XL Network Interface Cards 159 795
5 Install and Configure Network Interface Cards 70 350
5 Install and Configure E-Mail Clients 70 350
316M Memory Upgrades 150 450
3 Install Memory Upgrades 70 210
7 MS-Office Standard Edition Competitive Upgrade 200 1400
14 Install MS-Office Standard Edition 70 980
1 3Com 24 Port 10/100MB Fast Ethernet 10Base-T Hub 2500 2500
Total Second Floor $23,997.00
. Workstation Configurations (1st Floor) Police/Fire
2 Pentium Pro 200 MHz 2458 4916
32M RAM / 3.2G HD
12X CD ROM / Mulitmedia Kit
17" Montiors
Windows 95
MS-Office 97 Suite
MS-Word / MS-Excel
Outlook / PowerPoint
3Com 10/100 Ethernet Adapters
3 Workstation Prep 70 210
7 Workstaton Installation / LAN/Email Configuration 70 490
o HP JetDirect Card 450 0
o Install and Configure Print Servers 70 0
3 Windows 95 Upgrades 100 300
6 Install Windows 95 Upgrades 70 420
3 3Com Fast Etherlink XL Network Interface Cards 159 477
4 Install and Configure Network Interface Cards 70 280
4 Install and Configure E-Mail Clients 70 280
116M Memory Upgrades 150 150
1 Install Memory Upgrades 70 70
. 3 MS-Office Standard Edition Competitive Upgrade 200 600
6 Install MS-Office Standard Edition 70 420
o 3Com 24 Port 10/100MB Fast Ethernet 10Base-T Hub 2500 0
Total First Floor $8,613.00
TOTAL $116,893.00
"
I
\
. .
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
SUBJJ;CT:
5 Year CIP
DATE:
July 11, 1997
Discussion:
Attached to this memo is the proposed 5 Year Capital Improvement Program for the years 1997 thru
2001. The program is separated into two parts. The first part, is "Operations"(Exhibit "A") and was
previously adopted by the Council. The second part is the "Potential Projects" list (Exhibit "B") and
is the subject of the discussion for the workshop.
The Potential Projects program is further separated into two parts for each year. The first set of
projects/improvements are entitled Primary Projects. Primary Projects are those that will probably
be necessary over the next five years to maintain the existing infrastructure, or, as in the case of the
Annexation Area Trunk facilities, will be necessary in order to extend the infrastructure. Primary
Projects have a potential financing source as shown on Exhibit "C". However, this is not to imply
that the projects will actually be constructed within the year that they are listed.
Although the projects have a potential funding source, they will still have some impact on our
bonding capacity and will also require some tax revenue support. For example, it will be necessary
to "carry" some of the cost of the Annexation Area Trunk facilities. In other words, the City will
have to issue G.O. Bonds for the costs that are to be carried. Although the bonds should not affect
the "Legal Debt Margin" because they will probably be assessment bonds, they are still supported
by the general obligation of the City and could be a potential tax supported debt if the assessments
are not paid in a timely manner. Also, the street and sidewalk improvement projects will require
some amount of tax levy support in addition to special assessments because the City's policy is to
pay a share of the costs (about 45%-50%). And given the problems of keeping property tax levies
at an acceptable level as well as staying under the Legal Debt Margin, it is highly unlikely that all
of these projects will be "affordable".
The second set of projects are entitled "Secondary Projects" (the projects were prioritized by the
Council and the listing represents a "consensus" prioritization). Secondary Projects are projects that
.
.
.
are desirable but less essential than the more common improvements. They also have less of a
chance of being constructed unless a revenue source other than property taxes is found to finance
the project. Again, given the current problems associated with property tax levels and debt margins,
it is also highly unlikely that many of these projects will be "affordable" either.
In regards to the other source of revenue that I keep alluding to, I would suggest that the Council
commission a Blue Ribbon Committee to study the feasibility of establishing a local sales tax. I
realize that this was attempted back in 1994 and failed. However, I think the city did not do a very
good job of selling the concept and I also think that the rate proposed at that time (3%) was too high.
I think the community (its residents and its businesses) might find the tax more palatable if the rate
is reasonable and if the proceeds are to be used for specific projects - especially projects that will
enhanc~ the community and which will add to the excellent life style that we already enjoy in this
area. I would further suggest that the neighboring communities of Bayport, Oak Park Heights and
perhaps even Lake Elmo, be invited to participate in the study to determine if a sales tax might be
appropriate to finance projects that have an area wide benefit (such as the Community Center).
In regards to the CIP, I think the Council will have to make some further modifications in order to
eliminate the fluctuations each year. For example, the program, as it presently exists, lists projects
that would cost $15,895,000 in 1998, $5,680,000 in 1999 and $2,610,000 in 2000. The CIP could
be modified as I am suggesting as shown on Exhibit "B" (see page with lines/arrows) by moving
some projects to other years to "smooth" out the annual costs.
Hopefully, this can be accomplished at the meeting.
If the Council can reach agreement on the CIP I would recommend that the program be adopted at
this time with the understanding that it is primarily a planning tool that should be used to develop
the annual budget and for identifying projects that may be constructed if and when the fmancial
resource becomes available. Also, the program can be modified by the Council at any time.
I will provide you with a better understanding of the financial restraints the council will have to deal
with each year at the meeting Tuesday. However, as a general rule, a tax levy of $1,000,000 (for
related debt service of a 20 year bond) would generally add about $20 of taxes to residential property
each year (on a residence valued at $150,000).
Recommendation:
Council adopt 5 Year Capital Improvement Program.
-
fA
EXHIBIT IIAII
CITY OF STILLWATER
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM
Operations
.
ESTIMATED YEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
ADMINISTRATION
Local Area Network $18,000
Computer & printer upgrades $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Software $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
Office furniture $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
Video projector $20,000
Copy Machine $20,000
Total Admin'7stration $24,000 $28,000 $8,000 $28,000 $8,000
FINANCE
Office Equipment $3,800 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500
P,C" software & printer upgrades $5,865 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Software $3,200 $2,500
Total Finance $9,065 $11,300 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500
POLICE
Personal computers $2,400
Workstations & printers $2,500
Printers $1,200
Oxygen kits for squads $1,400
Preliminary breath testers $900
Office furniture & fitness equip, $10,000
3 Marked squads, equip. changeovers $66,600
2 Marked squads, equip, changeovers $48,800
Additional squad for fleet $24,400
Outfit the additional squad $13,900
Personal computers $4,800
Protective vests $600
2 radar units (replacements) $6,000
New camera equipment $1,000
2 oxygen resuscitator units (replacements) $2,000
2 Marked squads, equip, changeovers $74,700
Personal computers $10,500
Protective vests $1,250
2 radar units (replacements) $6,200
Preliminary breath testers $900
4 Records printers $2,600
4 Cellular telephone replacements $1,200
.
.
11-Jul-97
1
IIAII Cont.
.
ESTIMATED yEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Police, ctnd.
3 marked squads, equip. changeovers $77,000
2 radar units (replacements) $6,400
Used Vehicle for CSO $30,000
Protective vests $650
3 marked squad cars, equip, changeovers $78,500
Protective vests $10,000
Total Police $85,000 $101,500 $97,350 $114,050 $88,500
FIRE
Computer & printer $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Vacuum cleaner $250
Pump cans "'J $1,800 $1,800
Portable exhaust fan $1,500
Base radio $15,000
Radio $650
Chevy Blazer for Fire Chief $20,000
Refurbish 6107 (Pumper) $150,000
10 S.C.B,A.'s $20,000
New grass fire rig $50,000
New hose $20,000
New ladder truck $375,000 $375,000
Total Fire $44,200 $171,800 $400,000 $425,000 $5,000
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
Pick-up truck $20,000 $20,000
Personal computer & printer $5,000 $5,000
Database software $10,000
Software updates $5,000 $2,000 $2,000
Total Building Inspections $15,000 $5,000 $22,000 $0 $27,000
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Computer software $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
Computer & printer $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Map file $500
Office furniture $1,000 $1,000
File cabinet $300 $300
Car $15,000
Total Community Development $5,000 $2,800 $21,000 $2,300 $6,000
PUBLIC WORKS
Pickup $15,000
Computers $10,000
Copier $6,500
Office furniture $9,000
File Systems $3,000
Plotter $3,500
.
.
2
11-Jul-97
"A" Cont.
.
ESTIMATED YEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT ./
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Public Works, ctnd.
Pickup $30,000
GIS System $10,000
Computers $4,000
File Systems $3,000
Pickup $15,000
Office furniture $3,000
File Systems $3,000
Computers $5,000
Total Public Works $47,000 $47,000 $21,000 $0 $5,000
.,
STREET-
One ton truck $30,000
Plow truck $85,000
Plow truck $85,000
Compressor $15,000
Sweeper $115,000
Tar Kettle $20,000
One ton truck $30,000
Loader $85,000
Compressor $85,000
Total Streets $115,000 $0 $100,000 $165,000 - $170,000
SHOP
Shop roof $50,000
Shop trailer $30,000
Salt-sand/out building $200,000
Misc, equipment expenditures $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Total Shop $0 $300,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $344,265 $667,400 $696,850 $761,850 $337,000
SEWER
Jetter $175,000
Lift Station Repair $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
One ton truck $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
Aiple lift station $15,000
Lily Lake lift station $15,000
Myrtle St. lift station $30,000
Public works facility design $50,000
Public works facility land $200,000
TOTAL SEWER FUND $340,000 $235,000 $60,000 $30,000 $30,000
.
.
3
11-Jul-97
.
. ESTIMATED yEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT .,
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
PARKS
Pick-up truck (replacement) $15,000
Push Mowers $1,800
Weed Whips $400
In-field grooming machine $15,000
Wind screens for tennis courts $1,800
Basketball court - Staples $25,000
Play equip. (replace) - Sunrise $30,000
Overlay tar area - Ramsey $8,000
Privacy fence - Benson $3,000
Rebuild wall, Pioneer Park $185,000
Boardwalk, walking path Mckusick $50,000
Utility van - r~lacement $24,000
Kubota & attachments (replacement) $27,000
Thatcher for sweeper (replacement) $2,100
New flower gardens, north & south ends $6,000
Rebuild monument - territorial prison site $15,000
Basketball court - Scholenberg $25,000
New horseshoe pits - Northland $13,000
Rebuild sidewalk - Lowell Park restrooms $1,500
Storage building - Parks dept. $20,000
Kubota & attachments $26,000
Portable generator (replacement) $3,200
Lawn sweeper $21,000
Play equip, (replace) - Northland $15,000
Picnic shelter - Northland $20,000
Rebuild Willard St. steps $12,000
Rebuild Main St. steps $110,000
Ball field lights - Bonse $30,000
Ball field lights - Croixwood $40,000
Pick up truck (replacement) $28,000
Push mowers $2,100
Lawn tractor (replacement) $21,000
Fence basketball court - Benson $9,000
Rebuild hockey rink - Croixwood $11,000
Plow truck wI sander $50,000
Tractor loader (replacement) $48,000
Tree spade $21,000
Smithco sweeper $27,000
TOTAL PARKS FUND $335,000 $133,600 $277,200 $71,100 $146,000
LILY LAKE
Fence on ballfied backstop - Lily Lake $3,000
Picnic area & boardwalk - Lily Lake $20,000
Timers & Lighting - Lily Lake $5,000
Winter encl. & heater - forks for skin loader $3,100
IIAII Cont.
.
.
4
11-Jul-97
"A" Cont.
.
EsnMATED YEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT ......... -;-
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Lily Lake, ctnd.
Picnic shelter - Lily Lake play area $20,000
Play equip, (replace) - Lily Lake $10,000
TOTAL LILY LAKE FUND $31,100 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $0
LIBRARY
Paperback spinner $580
Microfiche reader/printer $2,200
Kid's catalogue $4,200
Adaptive technology for ADA $500
Computers $4,000
Printers $1,000
Telecommunications upgrade $7,800
..,
Office furniture $700
Office shelving $500
ADA compliance $3,000
Landscaping $2,000
Signage $1,000
Public access terminals/printers $5,000
Software upgrades $1,000
Computers $4,000
Printers $1,000
CD ROM workstations $3,600
ADA compliance $3,000
Office furniture $2,000
Adaptive technology for ADA $2,000
Computers $4,000
Printers $1,000
Software upgrades $1,000
CDROM workstations $3,600
ADA compliance $3,000
Office furniture $2,000
Public access terminals/printers $5,000
Computers $4,000
Printers $1,000
Software upgrades $1,000
Photocopier $7,500
ADA compliance $3,000
Microfilm reader/printer $7,500
Lighting Improvements $2,000
Furnishings, AV for Margaret Rivers Room $5,000
Office furniture $2,000
Adaptive technology for ADA $2,000
Computers $4,000
Printers $1,000
Software upgrades $1,000
.
I.
5
11-Jul-97
IIAII Cant.
.
ESTIMATED YEAR OF EXPENDITURE
DEPARTMENT & PROJECT
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Library, ctnd.
ADA compliance $3,000
Office furniture $2,000
TOTAL LIBRARY FUND $27,480 $19,600 $16,600 $38,000 $13,000
GRAND TOTAL OPERATIONS $1,077 ,845 $1,075,600 $1,060,650 $900,950 $526,000
"'"
.
.
6
11-Jul-97
CITY OF STILLWATER EXHIBIT "B"
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM
Potential Projects
. Council Consensus Ranking
Years 1997 - 2001 = Primary Projects
Project Tille 1997 1998
1997
Annexation Area Improvements $500,000
1997 Street Improvement 2nd Str $906,000
4th Street Ravine $200,000
Main Street Steps Repair $20,000
Levy Improvements $450 000
Total 1997 Projects $2,076,000
1998
Primary Projects
Annexation Area. Trunk
Hwy 36 Frontage Impr
Sidewalk Rehabilitallion
Curve Crest Mill Ov1rlay
1998 Street Imp, S. 1st St
Industrial Park Lighting
Elm Street Ravine
Total 1998 Primary Projects
Secondary Projec1s
Ice Arena/Community Center $6,000,000
Public Works Facility $1,500,000
Lily Lake Pump Station $105,000
Match Donation Pioneer Park $150,000
Environmental Clean up $100,000
Annory $1,000,000
Downtown Lighting $950,000
New Construction Pioneer Park $150,000
Parking Ramps $1,500,000
Prison Wall Repairs Phase I $200,000
Disc Golf $100 000
Total 1998 Secondary Projects $11,755,000
. 1999
Primary Projects
1999 Street Improvements
Annexation Area Trunk
1999 Sidewalk Rehabilitation
Holcombe Sidewalk
Hazel Street Ravine
Total 1999 Primary Projects
Secondary Projects
Purchase 30 acres/annexation area $600,000
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
Purchase Athletic Field from ISO $275,000
New Library Branch 51 500 000
Total 1999 Secondary Projects $2,475,000
2000
Primary Projec1s
2000 Slreetlmprovements $1,000,000
Annexation Area Trunk $1,000,000
Lily Lake Storm Sewer $150,000
2000 Sidewalk Rehab I!W!!l2
Total 1999 Primary Projects $2,210,000
Secondary Projects
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
Prison Wall Repairs Phase II $300 000
Total 1999 Secondary Projects $400,000
2001
Primary Projec1s
2001 Street Improvements $1,000,000
Annexation Area Trunk $1,000,000
2001 Sidewalk Rehab I!W!!l2
Total 2001 Primary Projects $2,080,000
'. Secondary Projects
Build park. Aipie property $800,000
North Hill sewer $3,000,000
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
Rebuild Lowell Park $6 000 000
Tolal 2001 Secondary Projects $9,900,000
Grand Total $2 076 000 $15 895 000 $5 680 000 $2 610 000 $11 960000
10.Jul.97 ;[
CITY OF STILLWATER EXHIBIT IIBII
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM
Potential Projects
Council Consensus Ranking
. Years 1997 - 2001 = Primary ProjeCls
Project rltle 1999 2000
1997 1998 2001
1997
Annexation Area Improvements $500,000
1997 Street Improvement 2nd Str $906,000
4th Street Ravine 5200,000
Main Street Steps Repair 520,000
Levy Improvements ~
Total 1997 Projects $2.076,000
1998
Primary Projects
AnnexatIon Area - Trunk
Hwy 36 Frontage Impr
Sidewalk Reh~i1itattion
Curve Crest Mjll O:;'~y
1998 Street Imp: S, 1st St
Industrial Park Lighting
Elm Street Ravine
Total 1998 Primary Projects
Secondary Projects
Ice Arena/Community Center
Public Works Facility
Lily Lake Pump Station
Match Donation Pioneer Park
Environmental Clean up
Armory
Downtown Lighting
N_ Construction Pioneer Park
Parking Ramps
Prison Wall Repairs Phase I
Disc Golf
Total 1998 Secondary Projects
. 1999
Primary Projects
1999 Street Improvements
Annexation Area Trunk
1999 Sidewalk Rehabilitation
Holcombe Sid_alk
Hazel Street Ravine
Total 1999 Primary Projects
Secondary Projects
Purchase 30 acres/annexation area $600,
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
PUl'chase Athletic Field from ISO $275,000
N_ Library Branch 1
T Olal 1999 Secondary Projects $2,475,000
2000
Primary Projects
2000 Street Improvements '1,000,000
Annexation Area T"'nk '1,000.000
LIly Lake Stonn Sewer '150,000
2000 Sid_alk Rehab mllllll
TOlaI1999 Primary Projects $2,210,000
Secondary Projects
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
Pnson Wall Repairs Phase II ~
Total 1999 Secondary Projects $400.000
2001
Primary Projects
2001 Street Improvements '1,000.000
Annexation Area T ",nk '1,000,000
2001 Sid_alk Rehab ~
Total 2001 Primary Projects $2,080,000
. Secondary Projects
Build park - Alple property saoo,ooo
North Hill s_er $3,000,000
Environmental Clean Up $100,000
Rebuild Lowell Park 56 000 000
Total 2001 Secondary Projects $9,900,000
Grand Total $2 076 000 $15895000 $5 680 000 $2 610 000 $11 960,000
10-Jul-97
1
EXHIBIT "e"
7/11/97
CITY OF STILLWATER
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM
Potential Projects - Financing
Years 1997 - 2001
= Primary Projects
Project Property Service Special State
Total Tax Charge Assess. TIF Grants Contribution
1997
Primary Projects
Annexation Area Improvements $500,000 $500,000
1997 Street Improvement 2nd Str $906,000 $426,000 o $322,000 $125,000 $33,000
4th Street Ravine $200,000 I . $94,000' . .,.. $106,000 .'
Main Street Steps Repair $20,000 $20,000 .'/ . " , : .
, ,
Levy Improvements $450,000 ' ' . . , . .' '$450,000
,
1997 Grand Total $2,076,000 $446,000 $94,000 - '$928,000 . $450,000 $125,000 $33,000
1998
Primary Projects
Annexation Area - Trunk $2,000,000 : ", , ", ' :.... :''',;:$2000,000 ' .
Hwy 36 FrontaQe Impr $700,000 ' , " . "'$450',000 :.'." . $250,000
Sidewalk Rehabilitattion $60.060 $30,000 ,.'~ , -,.#,',.,-- $30;000 .
.
Curve Crest Mill Overlay I $250,000 , '!:0:r\~, $250,000 "
1998 Street Imp, $800,000 . " $480,000 ."'1$320,000 ,
Industrial Park Lighting $30,000 , . " "'\$20,000 . $10,000
Elm Street Ravine $300,000 90,000 " 150,000 ",;:,>;: SO,OOO I
Total 1998 Primary Projects $4,140,000 $600,000 $150,000 . $3,130,000 $10,000 $250,000 $0
Secondary Projects
Ice Arena/Community Center $6,000,000 $1,925,000 $1,050,000 $250,000 $2,775,000
Public Works Facility $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000
Lily Lake Pump Station $105,000 $70,000 $35,000
Match Donation Pioneer Park $150,000 $150,000
Environmental Clean up $100,000 $100,000
Armory $1,000,000 $500,000 $500,000
Downtown Lighting $950,000 $950,000
New Construction Pioneer Park $150,000 $150,000
Parking Ramps $1,500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
Prison Wall Repairs Phase I $200,000 $200,000
Disc Golf $100,000 $100,000
Total 1998 Secondary Projects $11,755,000 $4,495,000 $0 $500,000 $3,235,000 $750,000 $2,775,000
~d Total $15,895,000 $5,095,000 $150 $3,630,000 $3,245,000 $1,000,000 $2,775,00
7/11/97
Project
1999
Primary Projects
Street Imp
Annexation Area Trunk Utilities
Sidewalk Rehab
Holcombe Sidewalk
Hazel Street Ravine
Total 1999 Primary Projects
Secondary Projects
Annexation Area Land Purchase
Environmental Cleanup
ISO Athletic Field
Branch Library
Total 1999 Secondary Projects
1999 Grand Total
2000
Primary Projects
Street Imp
Annexation Area Trunk Utilities
Sidewalk Rehab
Lily Lake Storm Sewer
Total 2000 Primary Projects
Secondary Projects
Environmental Cleanup
Prison Wall Repairs-Phase II
Total 2000 Secondary Projects
2000 Grand Total
.
Total
Property
Tax
Special
Assess.
TIF
Service
Charge
$' nnn nnn ct)Jnn nnl'\ '. $600,000
\to '.' , .... · $2,000,000 .
$60,000 ct~n nnn · - nnn I
$40,000 \t.,n nnn . ct?n nnn I
'I' .' -~.:-- ,.It.,~ nnn
$3,205,000 ~ - - -- $2,675,000
$0
"C" Cant.
State
Grants
Contribution
$0
$0
$600,000 $600,000
$100,000 $100,000
$275,000 $275,000
$1,500,000 $1,500,000
$2,475,000 $2,475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,680,000 $2,925,000 $80,000 $2,675,000 $0 $0 $0
. . $600,000
$1,000,000 .
'. -. ......^ nnn
$" '"^ ^^^
$430,000 $150,000 $1,630,000
$1,000,000 Cl!Ann
$1 nnn nnn
ctAn nnn
$150,000
$2,210,000
$0
$100,000
$300,000
$400,000
$100,000
$100,000
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
J'
$2,610,000
$1,630,000
$150,000
$530,000
$150,000
.
<
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
$0
$150,000
$0
.
lie' Cant.
7/11/97
Project Property Service Special State
2001 Total Tax Charge Assess. TIF Grants Contribution
Primary Projects
Street Imp $1;000,000 $4C>O,OOO 'iY .'i ...... ....... ii $600,000
i ..
Annexation Area Trunk Utilities $1,000,000 i $1.000.000
................i......
Sidewalk Rehab . $60;000 i .YiYd!..;1".nnn .yy. i.'.. i,..'i i'd!~f\f\nn. ............
Total 2001 Primary Projects $2,060,000 \. ~ ....... $1,630,000 $0 $0 $0
i $0..
Secondary Projects
Aiple Property $800,000 $800,000
North Hill Sewer $3,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Environmental Cleanup $100,000 $100,000
Lowell Park $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Total 2001 Secondary Projects $9,900,000 $1,600,000 $0 $1,500,000 $6,800,000 $0 $0
2001 Grand Total $11,960,000 $2,030,000 $0 $3,130,000 $6,800,000 $0 $0
Grand Total $36,145,000 $10,580,000 $380,000 $11,065,000 $10,195,000 $1,150,000 $2,775,000
J'
'.
.
.
.
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN
As of June 12, 1997
Estimated Market Value
Legal Debt Margin:
Debt Limitation - 2% of estimated market value
Total Bonded Debt
Less: Improvement Bonds
TIF Bonds .
524,835,000
(56,660,000)
(59,925,000)
..,
Total Debt AppliCable to Limitation
LegaI Debt Margin
.
I
.
5639,460.800
$12,78.9,216
58,250,000
54,539,216
EXHIBIT "0"
.
CITY OF STILLWATER
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROGRAM
Expenditure and Revenue Summary
Potential Pro'ects
2001
o erations
$900,950
$526,000
$2,610,000
$11,960,000
GRAND TOTAL
$3 510,950
$12,486,000
~ ...
Potential Financing:
Property Tax - Operations $1,077,845 $1,075,600 $1,060,650 $900,950 $526,000
Property Tax - Potential Proj $446,000 $5,095,000 $2,925,000 $530,000 $2,030,000
Service Charges $94,000 $150,000 $80,000 $150,000
Special Assessments $928,000 $3,630,000 $2,675,000 $1,630,000 $3,130,000
. TIF $450,000 $3,245,000 $150,000 $6,800,000
State Grants $125,000 $1,000,000 $150,000
Contributions $33,000 $2,775,000
TOTAL $3,510,950 $12,486,000
i.
11-Jul-97
1
I ,..'
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 97-16
July 1, 1997
REGULAR MEETING
4:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Mayor Thole at 4:30 p.m.
Present: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller
Absent; Mayor Kimble (arrived 4:50 p.m.)
Also Present: City Coordinator Kriesel
Assistant City Attorney Allen
City Engineer Eckles
Police Chief Beberg
Community Development Director Russell
Parks Director Thomsen
Fire Chief Ness
Public Works Director Junker
City Clerk Weldon
Press:
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
Sharon Baker, Courier
1. Discussion of Co. Rd. 15 extension project - Don Theisen, Washington County Public Works
Don Theisen and Sandy Cullen presented information regarding the Manning Avenue
Connection (County State Aid Highway 15) Corridor Study and reviewed the alternative
alignments for the proposed Manning Avenue connection.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Zoller supporting the
completion by Washington County of the full study and preparation of build alternatives for
Manning Avenue Connection (CSAH 15). 4-1 (Bealka nay)
2. Discussion of St. Croix Valley Sports Complex
Community Development Director Russell presented additional information regarding a new
option to reduce costs to address the funding gap for the sports complex: The ice arena would
be constructed without the fieldhouse as the first phase, 600 seats would be removed from the
arena, landscaping would be done by volunteers. He requested Council decision on the first
phase project, direction to develop strategy for planning and funding Phase II community
I
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
center\training center; and direction to have a proforma with approval of schedule
(Attachment "D") and management study prepared for the ice arena. He also requested
direction regarding discussing participation with Mahtomedi.
Tom McGlinch and Bonnie Vogel, representing the Hockey Association, stated their main
concerns were available ice time at a reasonable cost and the opportunity to recover
investment, such as concession stands.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka directing proforma be
prepared by Ron Langness, Springsted, Inc.; authorizing preparation of plans and specifications;
directi!ilg staff to investigate additional cost alternatives; and approval of schedule (Attachment
"D"). All in favor.
Recess at 6: 10 p.m.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
2
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
CITY OF STILL WATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 97-16
JULY 1, 1997
RECESSED MEETING
7:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Kimber at 7 :00 p.m.
Present:
Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Also Present:
'OJ
City Coordinator Kriesel
Assistant City Attorney Allen
Community Development Director Russell
City Engineer Eckles
Police ChiefBeberg
City Clerk Weldon
Planning Commission Member Valsvik
Press:
Sharon Baker, The Courier
Mike Marsnik, Stillwater Gazette
APPROV AL OF MINUTES
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings approving the June
17, 1997 Special and Regular meeting. All in favor.
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Patrick Poshek offered his proposal for services as assessor for the City.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Cummings directing
Finance Director Deblon and City Coordinator Kriesel to review the proposal of Patrick
Poschek for assessing services and return with report and recommendation. 4-0-1 (Thole
abstain)
CONSENT AGENDA *
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka approving the consent
agenda.
Ayes: Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
1. Resolution 97-146: Directing Payment of Bills
2. Approval to attend National Preservation Conference, Oct 14-19, 1997 - City Planner
3
. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
Peddlers Permit - David and Mary Jordan (ice cream truck)
Approve payment - Firefighter turnout gear
Contractors License Renewals: Nordquist Sign Co., Mpls; A-I Paint Works & Roofmg,
Stillwater
Resolution 97-147: Authorizing entering into Grant Agreement with MN Dept. of
Public Safety, for Safe and Sober Communities project.
Resolution 97-148: Memorandum of Understanding - Rate adjustment for Rivertown
Commons
STAFF REPORTS
1. Pol~ce Chief Beberg reported Dave Knefelkamp will be retiring from the State Crime Bureau.
He stated Knefelkamp began his career in law enforcement as a member of the City's civil
defense unit and served several years as police officer, attaining the rank ofInvestigative
Sergeant before resigning.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Thole, adopting Resolution 97-
149 commending David Knefelkamp for years of public service.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
Police Chief Beberg presented information regarding control of beer gardens from the League
of Minnesota Cities, and discussions with the City Attorney and Captain Bell. He suggested
the following rules be put into effect to help control beer sales and reduce liability to the City:
limit size to an area of 150' by 150', which is largest area that would be easy to control; all
openings be of a size that one person could control and check ID's; only beer would be
dispensed and consumed inside, no under age allowed in this area; no one working the beer
garden should consume or have consumed alcohol; and if any rules broken, the Police Dept.
could shut down the beer garden or take over control of security and bill the sponsor for these
services.
Council directed staff to continue work on development of policy for control of beer
gardens.
City Coordinator Kriesel reported staff will be meeting with Dave Eckberg (Lumberjack
Days) next week regarding control of beer gardens and arrangements will also be made for
Music on the Waterfront.
2. Community Dev. Director Russell presented quotes from Safety Signs and W.L. Traffic
Supply for installation of downtown parking signs at a cost of 891 plus 200 contingency.
He stated MnDOT might install the signs, but if they are not able to do so in a timely manner,
he recommended Council proceed with awarding the contract to Safety Signs.
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Thole accepting quote and
4
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
awarding contract to Safety Signs for installation of downtown parking signs if MnDOT is not
able to install signage in timely manner. All in favor.
3. Parks & Recreation
(report given by City Coordinator Kriesel at end of meeting)
4. City Engineer Eckles reported that additional information is needed to complete the Long
Lake Study and the feasibility report on the Mitigation Plan. He presented proposals from
BRA and SEH for additional survey work around Long Lake and requested approval to
purchase two foot contour data.
":l
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller adopting Resolution 97-
156 accepting proposals from SEH and BRA for additional survey work in annexation area and
directing staff to proceed with survey work.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
City Engineer Eckles also reported Monroe Wood would be retiring August 29, 1997, and
requested authorization to begin the application process for filling the mechanics position.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Thole authorizing City
Engineer to begin the application process for filling mechanics position. All in favor.
City Engineer Eckles requested Council authorization to advertise for bids for the Croixwood
Boulevard reconstruction project. He explained the public hearing would be held July 15, but
he felt the best bids would be received if advertisement for bids was placed as soon as
possible. If Council voted against the project at the public hearing, the advertisement would
be removed.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Thole authorizing City Engineer
to advertise for bids for Croixwood Boulevard reconstruction. All in favor.
He also informed Council Shawn Sanders had written and submitted a grant application for
erosion control of the Fourth Street Ravine; the City was awarded a $30,000 grant.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Case No. SUPN/97-24. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal
of the Planning Commission from Jon Whitcomb for a special use permit for residential use
and variance to parking requirements, 18 provided, 42 required, for the renovation of 6500 sq.
ft. commercial space and addition of a new second and third floor (11 housing units) at 124
Second St. in the CBD, Central Business District. Notice of the hearing was placed in the
Stillwater Gazette on June 20, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the case. Don Valsvik explained the
5
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
Planning Commission denial, stating the main concern was the variance for parking.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Jon Whitcomb presented his request. He stated he felt the project fits the development plans
of the City and the parking problem in the area would not be increased by any measurable
degree. He stated below level parking was not economically feasible.
Adjoining property owner Wayne Wohlers, Kinsel Liquors, 118 E. Chestnut, stated the
building was outstanding, but the shortage of parking would add to the existing parking
problems.
"\!
Dave Brooks, partner in the project, stated 15 minute meters on the street would alleviate
parking problems for businesses located near their proposed project.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Bealka denying appeal of the
Planning Commission decision from Jon Whitcomb for a special use permit for residential use
and variance to parking requirements, 18 provided, 42 required, for the renovation of 6500 sq. ft.
commercial space and addition of a new second and third floor (11 housing units) at 124 Second
St. in the CBD, Central Business District. Case No. SUPN/97-24. All in favor.
Recess at 8:05 p.m. Reconvene at 8:15 p.m.
2. Case No. PUD/97-34. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a request for
a planned unit development for the construction of seven single family, two-story homes with
shared driveways at 1303 - 1373 S. Fifth St., in the RB, Two-Family Residential District.
John Roettger, applicant. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on June
20, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the proposed development.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
John Roettger presented his request.
Allen Okerman, 1301 S. 5th Street, expressed concerns regarding excavation and drainage
plans.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka adopting Resolution 97-
150 approving planned unit development for the construction of seven single family, two-story
homes at 1303 - 1373 S. Fifth St., in the RB, Two-Family Residential District, as conditioned.
6
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
Case No. PUD/97-34. John Roettger, applicant.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
3. Case No. SUB/97-35. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a request for
a resubdivision for Lots 16 through 22, Block 1, Churchill's Second Addition and the north 30
ft of Lot 15, Block 1, and the south 27 feet of Lot 23, Block 1, Churchill's Second Addition
into seven single family lots at 1303 - 1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-family Residential
Dis;rict. John Roettger, applicant. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette
on June 20, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the request for subdivision.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no requests to be heard. The Mayor closed
the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings adopting Resolution
97-151 approving resubdivision for Lots 16 through 22, Block 1, Churchill's Second Addition
and the north 30 ft of Lot 15, Block 1, and the south 27 feet of Lot 23, Block 1, Churchill's
Second Addition into seven single family lots at 1303 - 1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-family
Residential District. Case No. SUB/97-35. John Roettger, applicant.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
4. Case No. DR/97-9. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider an appeal from
the Heritage Preservation Commission from David L. Paradeau for design review of exterior
signage for the Stillwater Depot at 601 N. Main St. in the CBD, Central Business District.
Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on June 20, 1997, and notices
mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reviewed the case and reason for denial by the
Heritage Preservation Commission. He stated the proposed sign was originally planned to be
internally illuminated, which is not permitted in the CBD under the City Code. In addition,
banners that have advertisement on them are prohibited according to the sign ordinance. He
reported Mr. Paradeau has now agreed to have the sign externally illuminated.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
David Paradeau presented his request. He stated the signage and banners were necessary due
to location of the business at the north end of town.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
7
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
Motion by Councilmember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Bealka approving exterior
signage for the Stillwater Depot at 601 N. Main St. and a two-season approval for the hanging of
banners, with review of banner use in July 1998. All in favor.
Recessed at 9 p.m. Reconvened at 9:05 p.m.
5. Case No. ZAT/97-1. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a request for
an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding zoning for newly annexed land.
Agricultural Preservation, AP Land. City of Stillwater, applicant. Notice of the hearing was
placed in the Stillwater Gazette on June 20, 1997, and notices mailed to affected property
"I
owners.
Community Development Director Russell reported a condition of annexation of expansion
area land, when first annexed to the City, is zoned agricultural preservation, AP. The land
will then be rezoned to a district consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
language has been approved by the Joint City/Town Planning board.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were not requests to be heard. The Mayor
closed the public hearing.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Cummings first reading of
ordinance amending Zoning Ordinance regarding zoning for newly annexed land. All in
favor.
6. Case No. V/97-28. This is the day and time for the public hearing to consider a request for a
variance to the front yard setback (30 feet required, 15'3" requested) for construction ofa two
story, 2000 sq. ft. addition to an existing single family residence at 2318 Boom Road in the
RA, One Family Residential District and Bluffland/Shoreland Overlay District. William C.
Messner, applicant. Notice of the hearing was placed in the Stillwater Gazette on June 20,
1997, and notices mailed to affected property owners.
Community Development Director Russell reported the applicant has requested the public
hearing be continued to July 15, 1997, to allow time for preparation of response to Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources concerns.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller continuing public
hearing, Case No. V/97-28, for variance to the front yard setback at 2318 Boom Road to July 15,
1997. All in favor.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Receiving Bids and Award Contract - Pioneer Park Wall Reconstruction
City Engineer Eckles presented bid results for Alternate A, concrete formlined wall; and
Alternate B, quarry stone wall.
8
.
.
.
City Council Meeting No. 97-16
July 1, 1997
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Bealka adopting Resolution 97-
152 accepting bid and awarding contract to Jay Bros. Inc., for Alternate B, quarry stone wall, for
Pioneer Park Wall Reconstruction, Job No. 9720.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
2. Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract - 1997 Street Projects
City Engineer Eckles presented bid results from June 30 bid opening.
~ ..,
Council directed street widths be maintained at 32 feet due to access needs for snow and
emergency vehicles.
Motion by Councilmember Thote,.seconded by Councilmember Zoller adopting Resolution 97-
153 Accepting bid and awarding contract to Tower Asphalt, Inc. for 1997 Street Projects
Job No. 9716.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
3. Receiving proposals and Awarding Contract - Reconstruction of Main Street steps.
City Engineer Eckles reported the City received proposals from Bailey Construction for
$20,000 and Jay Brothers for $31,450.
Motion by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller adopting Resolution 97-
154 accepting bid and awarding contract to Bailey Construction for reconstruction of Main Street
steps, Job No. 9727, for a cost not to exceed $20,000.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
NEW BUSINESS
1. Re-appointment of James O'Brien to Board of Water Commissioners.
Motion by Councilmember Bealka, seconded by Councilmember Thole adopting Resolution 97-
155 re-appointing James O'Brien to Board of Water Commissioners.
Ayes: Councilmember Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
2. Additional survey work for annexation area.
9
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION 97-157
American Linen Supply
.t.Ae Hardware
91A1KEYE
Amdahl, Chris
Architectural Digest
Amoco/Sprint
Area Wide Towing
B&B Office Supplies
Bryan Rock
Bailey, Chuck
Bergman Companies
Berkley Risk
Blichfeldt Construction
Braun PumR & Controls
Brockman Trucking
Burmaster, Russell
BWBR
Camas Shiely
Capitol Communications
Cardinal Home Builders
Chapin Const. Bulletin
Charlsen Trucking
Cou rier
Croix Oil
/afy's Uniforms
W. J.'s Municipal Supply
Desch, Mark & Gloria
E & B Discount Marine
Fina Fleet Fueling
Franklin Quest
G&K Services
Glass Service Company
Gebhard, Marge
Goodwill/Easter Seal
H. C. Cleaning
Healthcomp Eva!. Svcs.
ICMA
I nfratech
Jansen's Cleaning Service
Johnny's TV
Keyland Homes
Junker Sanitation
Kangaroo Self Storage
Lind, Gladys
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Council
McElderry, Mary
McNamara, Sheila
Metropolitan Council
Minncor Industries
Minnesota Pollution Control
Towel Service
Misc. Hardware
Seminar Registration
Fixed Locks
Subscription
Gasoline
Tow Car
Furniture Rental
Crushed Rock
Storm Sewer Repair
Blacktopping
Deductible
Grading Deposit Refunds
Lift Station Repair
Trailer Rental
Janitorial Services
City Hall Phase II
Washed Sand
Mobile Phone
Grading Deposit Refunds
Ads
Moving Services
Council Proceedings
Oil
Trauma Bag/Uniforms
Gas Trimmers
Parking Lease/Maint.
Gasoline Tank
Gasoline
Day Planner
Uniforms
Replace Windshield
Park Deposit Refund
Recycling
Cleaning Services
Drug/Alcohol Testing
Software
Camera
Maintenance Agreement
Copy Tape
Grading Deposit Refund
June Garbage
Storage Space Rental
Property Purchase
Legal Services
SACs
Park Deposit Refund
Mileage
Sewer Service
Tables
Olive St. Dump Site
36.84
38.52
139.00
72.00
59.90
1,833.39
25.00
80.00
48.44
500.00
1,920.00
388.27
6,000.00
127.80
181.04
360.00
1,405.40
128.43
355.10
1,500.00
380.80
609.00
64.80
691 .48
721.33
561.06
979.65
126.94
565.85
43.03
1,947.95
539.19
35.00
324.79
540.00
110.00
216.95
639.00
1,020.00
10.00
1,500.00
91,002.20
204.00
927.00
6,578.21
30,445.00
35.00
17.01
91,517.00
1 ,024.50
138.00
Moodys Investors Service
MPELRA
Northern Waterworks Supply
Norwest Banks
On-Site Sanitation
Oxygen Service
PDR
Quill
Reeds Sales & Service
Rose Floral
St. Croix Car Wash
SEH
State Chemical
Stillwater Area Chamber
Stillwater Gazette
Stillwater L~ndscaping
T eltronix .
Terry Allen Homes
Thompson Hardware
Thompson Publishing
Twin City Concrete Products
Twin City Service Center
University of Minnesota
Village Brass
Ward, Diane
Washington County
Watson, Dennis
Weldon, Morli
Wybrite
Youth Service Bureau
Ziegler
ADDENDUM
Airtouch Cellular
AT&T Lease Services
AT&T Wireless
AT&T
NSP
NSP
U. S. West
Professional Services
Conference Registration
Pioneer Park Retaining Wall
Paying Agent Fees/Meeting Fee
Rental/Service
Oxygen
Electronic Library
Office Supplies
Carb Kits
Bedding Plants
Wash Squad Cars
Engineering Services
Cleaner/Brushes
1997 Contribution/Meeting Dues
Legal Publications/Ads
Sod on Pine Street
Install Phone System
Refund Grading Deposit
Misc. Hardware
FLSA Handbook
Field Marking Grid
Maintenance/Relocate Dispatch
Seminar Registration
Plaques
Books/Postage
Map/Mobile Data Terminals
Computer Programming
Mileage
Maintenance
July Payment
Parts/Repairs
Cellular Phones
Leased Equipment
Cellular Phones
Long Distance
Street Lighting
Gas/Electric
Phones/Long Distance
Total Due:
Approved by the City Council this 15th Day of July, 1997.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
5,300.00
125.00
25.00
795.97 &.t
354.55 .
58.52
595.00
77.73
28.67
197.46
80.82
28,192.00
119.59
6,060.00
1,393.20
310.00
8,340.02
1,500.00
228.31
248.00
233.69
5,532.42
150.00
156.60
148.03
3,950.33
255.00 .
45.30
460.50
19,566.00
519.37
153.72
26.77
8.51
85.79
11 ,267.18
1,637.18
265.84
347,205.94
.
.
.
LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION 97-157
American Linen Supply
Ace Hardware
AMAlKEYE
Amdahl, Chris
Architectural Digest
Amoco/Sprint
Area Wide Towing
B&B Office Supplies
Bryan Rock
Bailey, Chuck
Bergman Companies
Berkley Risk
Blichfeldt ~nstruction
Braun Pump & Controls
Brockman Trucking
Burmaster, Russell
BWBR
Camas Shiely
Capitol Communications
Cardinal Home Builders
Chapin Const. Bulletin
Charlsen Trucking
Courier
Croix Oil
Cy's Uniforms
D. J,'s Municipal Supply
Desch. Mark & Gloria
E & B Discount Marine
Fina Fleet Fueling
Franklin Quest
G&K Services
Gal Service Company
Gebhard, Marge
Goodwill/Easter Seal
H. C. Cleaning
Healthcomp Eval. Svcs.
leMA
I nfratech
Jansen's Cleaning Service
Johnny's TV
Keyland Homes
Junker Sanitation
Kangaroo Self Storage
Lind, Gladys
Magnuson, David
Metropolitan Council
McElderry, Mary
McNamara, Sheila
Towel Service
Mise, Hardware
Seminar Registration
Fixed Locks
Subscription
Gasoline
Tow Car
Furniture Rental
Crushed Rock
Storm Sewer Repair
Blacktopping
Deductible
Grading Deposit Refunds
lift Station Repair
Trailer Rental
Janitorial Services
City Hall Phase II
Washed Sand
Mobile Phone
Grading Deposit Refunds
Ads
Moving Services
Council Proceedings
Oil
Trauma Bag/Uniforms
Gas Trimmers
Parking LeaseIMalnt.
Gasoline Tank
Gasoline
Day Planner
Uniforms
Replace Windshield
Park Deposit Refund
Recycting
Cleaning Services
Drug/Alcohol Testing
Software
Camera
Maintenance Agreement
Copy Tape
Grading Deposit Refund
June Garbage
Storage Space Rental
Property Purchase
Legal Services
SACs
Park Deposit Refund
Mileage
36.84
38.52
139.00
72.00
59,90
1 ,833.39
25.00
80.00
48.44
500.00
1,920.00
388.27
6,000.00
127.80
181.04
360.00
1.405.40
128.43
355.10
1,500.00
380.80
609.00
64.80
691.48
721.33
561.06
979.65
126.94
565.85
43,03
1,947.95
539.19
35.00
324.79
540.00
110.00
216.95
639.00
1,020.00
10.00
1,500.00
91,002.20
204.00
927.00
6,578.21
30,445.00
35.00
17.01
Metropolitan Council
Minncor Industries
Minnesota Pollution Control
Moodys Investors Service
MPELRA
Northern Waterworks Supply
Norwesl Banks
On-Site Sanitation
Oxygen Service
POR
Quill
Reeds Sales & Service
Rose Floral
St. Croix Car Wash
SEH _ "
State Chemical
Stillwater Area Chamber
Stillwater Gazette
Stillwater Landscaping
Teltronix
Terry Allen Homes
Thompson Hardware
Thompson Publishing
Twin City Concrete Products
Twin City Service Center
University of Minnesota
Village Brass
Ward. Diane
Washington County
Watson. Dennis
Weldon. Morti
Wybrite
Youth Service Bureau
Ziegler
Sewer Service
Tables
Olive S1. Dump Site
Professional Services
Conference Registration II
Pioneer Park Retaining Wall
Paying Agent FeeslMeeting ree
Rental/Service
Oxygen
Electronic Library
Office Supplies
Carb Kits
Bedding Plants
Wash Squad Cars
Engineering Services
Cleanerl8rushes r
1997 Contribution/Meeting 0 es
Legal Publications/Ads
Sod on Pine Street
I
Install Phone System
Refund Grading Deposit
Misc. Hardware
FLSA Handbook I
Field Marking Grid f
Maintenance/Relocate Dispa ch
Seminar Registration
Plaques I
Books/Postage
Map/Mobile Data T enninals I
Computer Programming I
Mileage
Maintenance I
July Payment
Parts/Repairs i
91,517.00
1,024.50
138.00
5,300.00
125.00
25.00
795.97
354.55
58.52
595.00
77.73
28.67
197.46
80.82
28,192.00
119.59
6,060.00
1 ,393.20
310.00
8,340.02
1,500.00
228.31
248.00
233.69
5,532.42
150.00
156.60
148.03
3,950.33
255.00
45.30
460.50
19.566-00
519.37
.
.
.1
~
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
PEDDLERS LICENSE
.
ADORESS:
NAME: E"V\\.~i", vP ~()(\ ~/^\~I(e
Last First
1; I (. C; M^ -4-.. -:&r-. ~ ..f/AJo...1
~I-// IrA 1~.)-.L1~/ MY! . <::;c, 05
DRNERS LICENSE NO, c:->~ ;; Z /. /s ~. -;z C; z . 6 </5
'lATURE OFeUSlNESS ANa GOOOS TO BE saDo ~ej""J4 ~ I e -'7
t Lf-lh +- Of
.
l~ 6' " V R 'd 'I
"."0 USlness Dlsmct -F=-- eSI entia
~/~.I\({J
Middle
Phone Nc:
Date or e;.
FEDERAl.
LOCATION:
C:;f t:arks (permission rii:quired by
?arl<s & Rec, ecard)
NAME )...'10 ACORESS OF EMPLOYER:
(creden:ials required)
E.l.APLOYER'S WORKERS COMPENSA lION POLICY NUMEE.~ a CARRIER:
VEHICLE TO BE USED, IF .AN'f: (mclude Rcanse numbercrotheridelrtification) 71- ~1..L---"FhM ..9tf'/ -t;L. F
g'O I ;::;;v~ d ??CJ-GLF
. OF TIME PERMIT REQUIRED: ' FROM: 0 ~~ Lt.. Z S ~
()~+ I :? I ~+-
TO:
r'1z:t-
INVESTIGATION FEE: $25,00 at time of filing appliaticn.
LlCENSE FEE: S20.CQ(year tor each person proposed to peddle on root
S50.OOIyear tor each pe~n proposed to peddle by using handcart or pushcart
S 1oo.OOIyear ror each pe~n proposing to peddle from wagon, motor vehicle or other vehicle or conveyance.
Copy of Ordinance #. 606 to applicant
, .
071df7',
. - ~
... .
, .
.' 'FOROFFICEUSEONLY '.;; ___ ", '
,QFFlCER'S'SIG~AruRE: e!;=.t:.. .'. 4~
. . .... . . .
, ~ " .
cil Approval
Date
Park & Recreation Board Approval
Date
Rev. date 4194
!\"'1;.jfi~r~~ ,i,
\-::Y!'Ii:!'{f;' ,'", --
j
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
PEDDLERS LICENSE
'-"'"'J<BtJ '\'\OCf. ~u1u- ir ,K 1'tN\ ; rl~fr.",
U filsl II.IlCldl
Il:(lRESS: -B-7 0 SoIAf.h l1veTGvf,^ n-....\./
h '
~ (tlA'a r{)/ I WIn , ~~ V ~1/
)RIVERSLlCEl'ISEI'lO. V tf-<7/ ?tL:; / ra8CJ 7B/
~ruRe~ BUStESSANDAO~::14~:t 1;~' e
" . - ~ '/......
_ ' _ Business District -r-- Residential
Ph,
o
F
C~f t:arlcs (?ermission required ~y
Parks & Re<:. Eoara)
LOCATION:
NAME J.NO ..caRESS OF EMPLOYER:
(c:tecMnlials required)
EMPlOYER'S WORKERS COMPENSA nON POlICY NUMBER to CARRIER:
VEHICl.E TO BE USED, IF ANY: (Include license number 01' ottler identiftcation) ~ Of81- (~L.r
~~()-bLf ~O' ~V~~
7-7- };tJ10
I.VIGlH OF TIME PERMIT REQUIRED:
~5
t!/ (J)c T 3/
FROM:
TO:
5h!t~~
Sa 01 Apptic:ant
tNESTJGAllON FEE: $25.00 at lime of ftIIng appllc3tlon.
UCCNSE FEE: S20.O(Yyear for each p41rscn proposed to ped~ on root.
$SO.OOJyelr for each p4lt$Ofl proposed Ie peddle by using handcart 01' pushcart
$100.00t'year for each p4lrscn proposing to peddle from wagon. motor vehicle or oltler vehicle or c:onveyana.
Copy 01 Onlinance '606 to applicant
DATE:
t17/'tl 7'?
.... ~
,., .
, , ,,'FOROrnCEUSEONLY .::: ,', ,.... ,
QFFICER'S~IGNAroRE..~ . : _ -~
INVESTIGATIONCHECK:'OO
Council Approval
DelCe
Pm-k &. Recreation Board Approval
Date
ReY. dare ..,~
\' f':i$.,
"'.'" "
~, -.~ I"
L 'If:rt
r ",,<:.1t
n.' '~,'.' "....
~' '- \ .::s:
I ii'
.~ ..
~
t
f
t,
.~
'",!
\
,
{
,
l.
'l
\.
L
,.~ L.
! ;~
'\1
<I
-.
I
-j
j
1
.
I
1
I
!
r
~. 1
I
I
Ii
r
fi:
,"'
r
'~
t
~
I ~ .', .
It: :;~j,'A
~:" 'g">,
i(}'rnij;l
I~'~J :;.11:1t:.
g :". I'~'i,
-',~ ::t~ ;h,'
I':' ~:/~~
~
..
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTMENT Parks
NfEETIl\rG DATE July 15th 1997
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
Request to start on the Lily Lake Beach Improvements
Picnic area and walkway from the beach to the fishing pier
-".
. FINANCIAL IMPACT ,Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated "ith this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
--......-
Budgeted For Under C/O Improvements for 1997 $20.000
ADDITIONAL INFORMA nON A IT ACHED
YES
NO-1L-
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITIED TO TIlE CITY CLERK A
MINlMillv1 OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO TIIE NEXT REGULARL Y SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN TIIE COUNCIL W...TERIAL PACKET.
SUBMrITED BY ~ '- -LL---
DATE 7- 5- 97
.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTNIENT Parks
NfEETING DATE July 15th 1997
.
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Brieny outline \vhat the request is)
To Hire Sarah Hamilton~as a part time lifeguard. Sarah has worked
with us in the past years
The Pay Will Be The Same As Last Year $7.50 HR.
.,
FINANCIAL IN!P ACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
.
..........
Budgeted For Under Part Time-Seasonal Help
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATIACHED
YES
NO~
ALL. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS tvfUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A
MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO TIIE NEXT REGULARL Y SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBMlTIEDBY ~ ~ ~--- DATE 7- '?-.:77
.
.
.
.
"
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles
City Engineer
lli:~
SUBJECT: Approval of Brown's Creek Cost Sharing Proposal
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a proposal from the Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD)
which discusses the cost sharing of the outlet monitoring station on Brown's Creek. The
City's share would be $1,500 of the $18,000 monitoring station cost. Last September the
City Council considered this and approved the concept. Council needs to formally pass a
resolution approving the $1,500 cost sharing.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should pass a motion adopting a resolution approving the expenditure of
$1,500 as the local match for the Browns Creek Watershed Outlet Monitoring Station
with Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District.
WASHINGTON SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
le~6 Curve c'.., e"'<I,. Room 101
$nllw016r. MN ~~a2
Ct 12) 1:)9.036 I
MINNESOTA C.
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
July 10, 1997
Mr. Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
FAXED AND MAII.F.D
(Fax 430.8810)
RE: Browns Creek Watershed Outlet Monitoring Station
Dear Klayton:
As we have discussed, the Browns Creek WMO is at the point of implementation of the outlet monitoring
station, It is at this time that we would need to receive your financial contribution for this project. I believe the
City Council approved an expenditure of $1,500 for a podion of the local match. If you could send the $1,500
to our office or send some fonn of documentation (meeting minutes, Council resolution) approving the
~xpenditurc, it would assist in the equipment acquisition and installation phase of this project. I have enclosed
some supporting documentation for your records.
Thank you for your continued support and consideration. If you have any questions, please fed free to call me
at 430-6826.
Sincerely,
/J1~ D~/
Mark J. Doneux
Water Resource Specialist
ene,
OP1IOIl....l fORM at (HOt
f.. .
/I 01 PO:ll>$" 4
Do .y!_~v)f
{, "6Z6
430 0?J9-
C:\~1SOFFJCE\ Wl~WORD\MJO\ WSD\BCWMO\071 OECKL,DQC
NSN 75~0_Ol_317-7~
-101
(lE1Il. ." $iORVICES AOIHII$lF<ATK)N
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllV EMPLOVER
.
.
.
.
.
.
-.l
EXHIBIT A-WORK PROGRAM ACTlVJTlES
lbe Browns Creek Water"Shcd Maoasement Organization wiU iuawl and opc:ra&c . water quality s.e.n1pling
station near the OUllet of Browns Creek. nata collection after May I, 1996 will be eligible for reimbursement
undcf this Grant A81v{~t. and sbaU last through the project aaivity period (paragraph 6.01).
A$ put of this '!9~)W!nt. the GraD&ce will ~gin collceting precipitation and nmoff dAta in lhc spring of
1996, fot 10-15 eYmts spread as evenly as possible throuJboul the rest of the 1996 ninfall seuon, and
s:aowmelt data in the spring of 1997. Routine WMO sampling prograzns will be expected to IIC.COW11 for the
quality ofoon-event baseflow for the year.
CootiDual flow IllCOI'ding is requiR:d tbrougboul the rainfall ssmpling season. Equipment to a.:complish this
call be purc:bucd with the graal F1ow~jted water quality samples ue also required for eacl1 ~t
submitted for lDIlysis. Single grab AD1ples taken during an evect will DOt be accepted, other thm for
mcrc:ury samples, if collected.
1'be 0naIee will subuUt fid4 $llDpJcs to the Metropolitan CoIIJV!iI WastI:9taW Sc:rviees' labcnt.ory at the
MdrgpOlitm Waste'MIta' T~tnvftt Planl Tbe resu.J.tI of the labona<<y aDIlyses will be ~ to the
Gnatee via the Ccuncil's projcet m.aoager. The Grantee is expcc:Uld to dcYdop watcrsbod loads for cacll
evmt. and to p~ an analysis oftbc: year's total watenbed load based CI1 the coUeded flow, quality and
~itatioo data.
Samples subaUtted to the: laboratory by all participating Grmtcc:s will be analyzed for total suspendM solids
(TSS), volatile suspc:aded solids (VSS), total phosphorus (TP), dissolved pboIpborus (OP), and c:bcmical
oxyaea ~AM (COD). The Grautee for this agreema1t aud the Couneil'. projClCt m.n~gcr may request other
analysis within tho total gram ~ available (approximately $4(0) DOt lDed for the uniform set of
aaalyseI DOCcd in tbis parasraph. Tbc COUDcil will withhotd . total of $1200 from the gram to pay the (()fts
of an JabQntoIy services, as specl~ in paragraph 3.03 of tho GI1D1 A5J~l
1'be Coundl will ptepItC a final program report wbeo all of the data aad Qraa1ee-providcd analyses have
heal rc:cei...ed and analyzed. This report will be provided to ~ partic:ipaDt in the watcrsbcd Outlet
Monitoring Program.
A-l
..
,,",' 0 ;:::1':'>
ExluBlT B-PROaCf BUDGET
Preliminary Estimate of Permanent Outlet Monitoring Station
Browns Creek
ISCO S;Jmpler
24 Boule Reception Unit
YSI Flow Meter
Depth Probe
Dissolved Oxygen/Temp Probe
Tubing
DatOl Transfer/Software
Shelter
Power
Station Monitoring/Sample Pick up
,
Misc.iSet up cllndngendes
TOTAL
$2.695
$155
$2.260
$550
$450
S100
$1.500
$500
$600
$4.000
$3.1 C)O
$18,000
8.1
.~
.
.
.
I
.-.J
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS'ONEJtS
WASH"GTON COUNTY, .....ESOTA
RESOlUTaoN NO. 97 - 020
_ATE February 4. 1997
OTlON BY COMM~ONER
lilirahamson
DEPARTMENT Admini~tration
SECONDED BY COMM~ER Hauser
Authorixing the Expenditure of Brown's Creek WaterShed
Funds for a Permanent Watershed Outlet Monitoring Station
WHEREAS, Washington County has accepted responsibility as the Brown's Creek
Watershed Management Organization;
WHEREASI the previous W'MO had received a Met Council grant for this project in the
amount of $13,500 that requires a local match of $4,500;
WHEREAS, implementing a water monitoring station at the outlet of the Brown's Creek
Watershed is vital to the long-term management goals of the plan;
WHEREAS, it is important to begin implementation of this monitoring station now to
have it in operation for the spring runoff events, if possible;
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater and Trout Unlimited are both interested and concerned
stakeholders with regards to implementing 3. watershed outlet monitoring station;
.
WHEREAS, both the City of Stillwater and Trout Unlimited should participate financially
with the installation costs of the watershed outlet monitoring station;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the washington County Board of
Commissioners authorizes the expenditure of $1,500 for one third of the local match provided
that it is met by equal contributions from the City of Stillwater and Trout Unlimited for the
installation of the watershed outlet monitoring station.
BE IT FUR11lER RESOLVED, that the County costs for this project be assessed to the
Brown's Creek Watershed.
.
ATTFSt' 9- I 14
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
\'(\~ G.i.......~
CHAJRMAH. COUNTY BOARO
YES
NO
ABRAHAMSON
ENGSTROM
HAUSER
HEGBERG
PETERSON
x
x
x
x
x
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: City coordinator
SUBJECT: HV AC maintenance service
DATE: July 15, 1997
Discussion:
The City has used Equipment Supply, Inc. for preventative maintenance of the City Hall and Library
heating and air conditioning systems (HV AC) for the past 4-5 years. Equipment Supply has
performed very well and I would recommend approval of a one year contract to retain their service
for the period beginning, July 1, 1997 and ending June 30,1998.
The contract price is $3168 for City Hall and $2856 for the Library. The price for last year (7/1/96 -
7/1/97) was $2796 and $2580 respectively. The increase for the Library is minimal and the increase
in price for City Hall, is understandable given the fact that a new and more complex system was
installed at City Hall.
As I said before, I am pleased with the service that Equipment Supply has provided over the past few
years and I would recommend approval of the attached agreement for a one year period.
Recommendation:
Approve HV AC preventative maintenance agreements for City Hall and Library with Equipment
Supply, Inc.
/!!~
RESOLUTION NO. 97-159
APPROV AL OF CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY OF STILL WATER AND
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC., FOR HV AC PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the Contract for
preventive maintenance services for heating and air conditioning systems for City Hall and the
Stillwater Public Library for the period July 1, 1997 - June 30, 1998, attached hereto as
Exhibit A, by and between the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, and Equipment Supply, Inc., is
hereby approved, and the appropriate city staff is authorized to sign said Agreement.
Adopted by Council this 15th day of July, 1997.
~,
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
.
EcaUIPMENT SUPPLY INC.
SALES & SERVICE
FAX: 646-2971
24-HOUR PHONE: 646-2571
593 NO, FAIRV1EW AVE., ST, PAUL, MN 55104
June 18, 1997
City of Stillwater City Hall
216 Fourth Street North
Stillwater:MN 55082
...
SMC-239
Attention: Mr. Nile Kriesel
Dear Mr. Kriesel,
Please find enclosed a copy of your new Preventive Maintenance Contract.
The contract price will be $3168.00 per year.
.
I have attached a copy of the contract which has the equipment list and the
check list we use when we do your maintenance checks.
We currently have maintenance checks scheduled for Januaiy, April, July,
October. Please cali if you have any questions or if we can be of any further
servIce.
Yours Truly,
Rod Charlton
Sales Representative
Accepted by:
Date:
.
f4 '==I:~!UI'.\7"\f';:: A("-~'I(l\l'. ::=1'""1 !IO: t"""Il;:)10(''''I:::;~''1 :1 'v -'-"'/'=~tCI'lV';::I::;1
E. ~.. EGlUIPMENT SUPPlY INC.
SALES & SERVICE
FAX: 646-2971
24-HOUR PHONE: 646-257
593 NO. FAIRVIEW AVE" ST, PAUL. MN 5510
Mechanical Contractors: HEATING - AIR CONDITIONING - REFRIGERATION
June 18, 1997
City of Stillwater Public Library
225 North Fourth Street
Stillwater MN 55082
SMC-238
"\
Attention: Mr. Nile Kriesel
Dear Mr. Kriesel,
Please find enclosed a copy of your new Preventive Maintenance Contract.
The contract price will be $2856.00 per year.
I have attached a copy of the contract which has the equipment list and the
check list we use when we do your maintenance checks.
.
We currently have maintenance checks scheduled for January, April, July,
October. Please call if you have any questions or if we can be of any further
servIce.
Yours Truly,
Rod Charlton
Sales Representative
Accepted by:
Date:
.
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION' EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
.
.
.
SERVICE AGREEMENT GUIDELINES
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INC. will service all equipment listed under this service agreement.
All work will be done by Qualified Service Technicians. We will also provide a selected
preventive maintenance service of all the equipment covered under this agreement. The
equipment is to be in good operating condition at the start of this agreement.
This agreement is based on a regular 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. work day, 5 days per week.
However, we will be available for service 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Overtime
calls will be done at an additional charge, but at a reduced service customer rate. This
incluCles nights, weekends & holidays. Any call placed with us prior to 3:00 p.m. on a nor-
mal weekday will be done at no additional charge.
This agreement does not include the following:
1) Equipment damage caused by failure of any utility service such as damage
caused by power failure, low voltage, lightning, single phasing or other abnormal
electrical problems.
2) Equipment damage caused by carelessness or vandalism.
3) Equipment damage caused by fire, flood, freezing or other Acts of God.
4) Replacement of evaporator coils, condensers, furnace heat exchangers & com-
pressors. Should anyone of these items require replacement it will be done at a
reduced service customer price.
5) Cabinetry to include gaskets, hindges & latches.
6) Power Supply to the Equipment including the disconnect.
7) Obsolete equipment for which parts can no longer be obtained.
8) Equipment Supply will not be responsible for any product loss.
Terms on all billable services will be net 30 days. If payment is not received within 30
days, service will not be provided until payment has been received.
The service agreement payment is due prior to the start of each quarter and must be kept
current. Payment must be received on or before the 1 st day of the service period. If pay-
ment is not received within 12 days after the start of that period, service will not be provid-
ed until payment has been received. This is an annual agreement to be paid quarterly, or
monthly and may be cancelled by either party upon 30 days notice after the initial year.
EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INC.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE PROGRAM
"
PLAi~ B:
1. MAINTENANCE SERVICE:
PROVIDES AN EXTENSIVE INSPECTION,
CLE~G,ADJUSTING,AND
LUBRlCATION PROGRAM, (SEE THE
PREVENTIVE N1AINTENANCE SERVICE
SECTION.)
2. PARTS & LABOR COVERAGE:
PROVIDESPRO~TEMERGENCY
SERVICE AT A DISCOUNTED RATE.
THERE WILL BE A 10% DISCOUNT
SHOWN ON THE BOTTOM OF EACH
INVOICE.
.
.
.
,::.E 3ilUng Address
Contract
~umber
Con t r act I n E 0 r 1 a t i J rr
-. . ~:::.: ~ITY OF STILL~1TER CITY l:il1L
SHe - 239
Type 3
St~1'" 07/01/97
Snd 06/30/98
.:\..IJlGUnc 3168.00
Status .let: llE
3ill Scarr. 07/01/97
3ill t:icle
Bill Cat:gorf 3
S'iC Star: 07 ; 0 11 97
Svc ~icle 9i~~e~~s
Svc C.:.ll Ty~e ~M ME}!1' ,
(us c ?o
Buver ~LZ IRIESBL
,92one ;:612) ~39-S12:
-'0 1'lil fIRE
~URTH STREET NORTH
..-1L~~ ,~ 55082-
::--:.:: :ccac:on: C!'I'Y OF STILLWATER CITY lii.LL
?OLIO ,JJII) nRB
215 ~UR'l'R STREET !IORTI
Concace )!!t. mE iRBSBL
?hcne (612)~39-~121
Zcne
STILLWATER ~tffi S5082-
~iDe ~4cdel '2c<ie Medel ~arr:.r!D lroi::s Seri?l ~umbe! :ocac:on
3F.T:'JI1' 3011&1. HHD , 250:0
, !
':"11"'1'\ ?1jj.ijl 3BJ0086,SB5B2CTLO
...."*..'_"J
J.~'ili BOIi,RR .., ~0012S0100J1 DC.. '82ll]
::mlR ,:0 ;31LLER ITAA070AYFaLlJDlEF ij96JJ6i:d
:?JliZ M CCMPP-ESSCR CBfOJ9.ICCN04JA UF.625:3
_0./
,- ~11R ~" COMPRESSOR CEEN035~_~N04JA JA6dJ 619
: \).)
:'~lfES M ~.fUSERC{]MEX 'iEBKO 8L "1'11 ~.... .~O~
OUJ:~~.J .!.
:1JBES '1 \!IJm.C{]~ 7EEK08L '0''''' '0.
o J::J":'. 'j to
:'1].NBS :1 ~,mSERCC1.w..( 'iEEKl3Plijill.l0S~Cl 6035ol.J06
:?JlIR C~ liP.Eih'lil0. r96ci4134~
~lCQ ?lJr.P C22007EJJ~.B8J 7
:lCQ ?OO CE2007E3Jil.B837
iTIR1JIG :mE ill , i
:l~m .-.... ?J.AC/ETG '[CD090C2EC3E ~251.:J42Q4D
.. .',j
: .~\jR-.... E-AC/3:G YGG43C2EC3E S2:~O~51)3D
.. _-..:, _ ',-'J
.: )li3 CO GRE)12PDHEONJJTI02AO I :l.96llJS403
i
~ ~ C.~.R.l!ES ~ :mSllRCCMRX VEBK08L / 603561,J04
-. :l,,'iliS :1 ~.fUSEP,CCMRX :TEBK08L ! 503561, J03
, - ::~.FliES ~ )illSllRCCMEX 'TEBKlOW1Gf.l0SFCl I "/ 603561. JQ.5
..
--------------------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Service Checklists for ESI
Run Date 06/11/97 15:13:06 Page
1
===============================================================================================================================
.
~'~klist Description
SMC-239 SMC-239 CITY OF STILLWATER P/F MAINTENANCE CHECKS ro BE OOBE IN: JANUARY, APRIL, JULY, ocroBER
WE WILL CLEAN, CHECK & INSPEcr 'l'HB FOLLOWIM;:
AIR COND ITIONING AND BHATTI<<; SYSTEM
_Condenser coils, evaporator coils, drain pans (pressure wash)
_Air handler blowers to include tension and allignment of
belts (replace with custOOl!r provided belts as needed)
_Lubricate blower IOOtOrs, air conditioner and heat
_Suction and condensing pressures
_Refrigeration charge and leak test system
_Starter contacts and coils
_Solenoid valve operation
_Expansion valve operation
_Lubricate rotors and bearings
_Controls, to include electrical
_Compressor oil level, also acid testing
_All units for vibration and noise
_Air conditioners started & checked (spring) shut down (fall)
_Filters cleaned or repaced if needed (customer provided)
WATER AND STEAM BOILERS
_Fill & start boiler in fall & drain & flush in the spring
_Safety controls and unit operation
_Gas pressure at burner
_Combustion burner
_Low water cut off
_Operating pressures, water level and teurperatures
_Relief valve
_System for leaks
_Combustion fire box
_For scale and corrosion
_Servie circulating pump
_Drain expansion tank as needed
_Prepare boiler for annual inspection
.
GAS AND OIL BURNERS
_Flame safeguard system
_Combustion air to burner from outside
_Blowers and draft controls
_Combustion efficiency
_Adjust gas and oil pressure
PUMP-BOILER, GLYCOL, CHILLER, AND CONDENSER
_Motor bearings
_Pump coupling
_Lube motor and bearing assembly
_Pump bearing assembly
_Amp draw
_Overall visual inspection
.
'Service Checklists for ESI
Run Date 06/11/97 15:12:56 Page
. Description
===========================================================================================================================
GAS OR ELECTRIC HOT WATER HEATER
_Pilot
_Burners
_Stack
_Spark ignition
_Temperature settings
_Overall visual inspection
"
WATER AND STEAM BOILERS
_Fill and start boiler in the fall & drain & flush in the
spring
_Safety controls and unit operation
_Gas pressure at burner
_Combustion burner
_Low water cut off
_Operating pressures, water level and temperatures
_Blow down the low water cut off and water legs
_Relief valve
_System for leaks
_Combustion fire box
_Mud legs
_For scale and corrosion
_Feed water pumps
_Check for leaking stem traps
_Prepare boiler for annual inspection
.
GAS AND OIL BIlRNERS
_Flame safeguard system
_Combustion air to burner from outside
_Blowers and draft controls
_Adjust gas and oil pressure
_Combustion efficiency
MAKEUP AIR, AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS, SUPPLY & EXHAUST
_Controls
_Fan pulleys, DIOtors, wheels, drives and bearings
_Belts
_Vibration isolation mounts
_Airs ide heat ransfer surfaces
_Condensate drains
_Shaft assembly
_Outside air dampers
_Air distribution
COMMENTS:
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------.-------------------------------
JUL-15-1997 15:32
:c....'1ic~ COlltract Master !J.st for BSI
~:cmer aillingAddress
\cc:mot
Contract
Numr
~ . STILL CITY OF STIIW.'m
~IC LIBW.~
m NORTH POORTII STRm
STILLli~TllR Mi 55082.
~~.m
j~!"ILC~ ~omion: CITY OF SilJ.LWA'l'BR
PUBLIC LlBAARY
m OOiTH ?OUR'l1 STREET
STILL~A'ml MIl 55082.
'"
In:t 1'y]le ' Model Croe Model
,~w R:lll F~.N nG65
J TACO ~ illS 2'IT1lR 7HlaJ
aAABBR/C01 PNEUM COIlT m LISTED
'1 aOOEMLL AIR DRIEl 8010
-. QUIHCY AIR cooa lO6
~~ AMS'rAID !lAm 3TR GJ OAGL
~ mI FAN m6S
.\lflDMAN mlllN 91065
TRANi co .~ SIC mB ~6
1'1lmCO CONn UNIT me88
3URlW.M SOIW K-SOHB
ilPJI!l .- \'&Ila2e
iliimM ~Am ll'm llOT LIS"t'lID
TACO PM Sl43/0G4ll1
612 546 2971 P.02/04
Run.Data 06/11/97 14:03:00 Page
Contract InEorllation
.
Type 8
Start Gi 101[97
gnd 06/30/98
AlDJunt 2856. CO
S taws Active
Contact MP.. NILE KlUBSBL
~arranty Expires
1 1
I
/
I /
I I
I I
/ I
I I
I I
, I
( I
I I
J i
/ 1
/ I
Bill Start 07/01/97
am Cycle
Bill Category B
Svc Start, 07/01/97
Svc Cycle Pic.~e~ks
$1/C Call 'l'tpe PM 10.00',
C1Jst ~o
Buyer MR. nLB mBSBL
(!lone (612) 439-1615
Phone i6121439-l671 Zone STILLWArBR
Serial !l1.lmbe:
Kat' LISTRll
OOT LISiiO
NOT LlmD
030lHH807.
343340
6'l'D46iiSDE
NOT mTBD
NOT LISTED
KiCm2H
L2F6 5il5 0
7703155
1115
Nor LI~
OOT LISTml
t.lc3t:.on
1/6 ii:P
3/4 KP 1725 RPM
...
..
Ow....... ____ ..__............ _______ ____...__.................. ...............oo.. .'~.. ... .... ....__..._............. ....."'..... .......... ___........ ........ __........ _....... ...............
-:-!:~ ~!t:":"=;;;::;;~ ;;;:: :::::::u:! 2............;:: :===:::::==~:~. .;;t.';; ;';:=:::.:=:~=:;:;;; ::::=::::::~t:: :.;;:::: :::::::::: ::=~;;.. =.:::.::.===::.=::.~:!:=:
.
JUL-15-1997 15:32
Service Checklists for BSI
612 646 2971 p.03/04
Run Date 06/n/97 15: 12:56 Page
~~ :~:;_.___~:::.ip".t"i,,~_____..._________.......________....______.........________._...__......------..~..--------..-.______
-- ...--- ~ .-...--------.......----...---...--------..--------------............-...--- .... -----....... ------------.........
8 Sl(.23Q erl'i OP mWlATBR 1m lIAlH'l'BlWlt'll ms 10 BB IlOIIB IN: JANUARY, APRIL, JULj, ocroBBR
HE ifILL CLW, ClIICI i IISPSCT 'l'iIB FOLLOW1llG:
AIR CONDmo,oo ABD mTOO SYS'I'PJ(S
_Condenser coils, !\-aporato: coils, drain pans (pressure wash)
_Air !landler blOwers to include teIlSion and aligIDe1lt of belts
_Water cooled units for proper water flow aIld head pressure
_Lubticate blower llIJtors, air cOnditioner and heat
_SUction and cODdellsi.ng pressure
_RefrigeratiOll charge and leak test system
_Sarter Caltacts and coils
_Solenoid valve operation
_Kxpaasion valve operatiat
_Lilbricate motors am bearings
_Controls; to include ele<:trical
_CClllpl'essor oil level, also acid testing
_All units for vibration and noise
_Air conditioners started, checked (springl shut dolfll (fall)
_Filters cleaned or replaced if needed (cust~r providedl
....
.
.
caIWRS
_Chiller flow switch
_Clliller safety free:e tlleIllO!tat
_Chiller control thetilKlstat
PlJM11S - BOI1BR, GLYCOL, CSILLERJ AND COMlllHSBR
....Qt'ileariAlll
----..J'-, ~;;,;iit~
.~~
~Lube motor and bearing asse'llbl y
_Pump bearing assembly
_AIIp draw
_Overall viSl!al ins~tial
PIlDIlTlC ComOL SYSTEM - PIIlMlTICS. COMPRBSSED An.tl'fi
. AIR CCMPR:8SSOI
_Air station
_C~ressor lUll time aDd olllevel
--Air intake, airline filter acd oil aeparator
_Calibrat l'OOl\ thermstats
_Calibrate fan systelll controls
_Calibrate heating system controls
_Calibrate cooling systl!lll controls
_Lubricate. actuators am lilllcage
_lAlbricate vallie actuators and packinq
_Clean condenser
-'klisture blow dolrn
_RefrigErant charge
_Belts
_OVerall visual inspectioo
JUL-1S-1997 15:33
~Ervi.ce Checklists for ESI
'::iecltlist llescriptiOll
612 646 2971 P.04/04
Run Date O~/11/97 15:13:23 Page 2
::~:::::=: ::!==:=:~; ":=;:=-::=S:'::=:==~=:::::::~':==~1;=::::=::::s::=.:=q=:;r::.= ========::=::=:=: ::::::::::===::=::::.::::::::::::::::::::
...
RmIGmTlON SYSTEM
_Air cooled condeIJsers
_Lubricate condenser fan rotors I bearings , blades
_Bvaporators , drain pans on walk'in & reach in coolers ~
freezers
--.:..~se . voltase
_Refrigeration charge & misture i.IIlicator
______C~re55or crankcase beaters
_lIead pressure , suction pnssure
_Check superheat .
_Visual iDSpection of all units for lines rubbing & loose
mounting also check for vibration & noise
_SysteQ are cbecked for refrigerationlWs
_Teujperatures 00 coolers &; freezers
_Defrost tillletS
_Blectrical tor loose or burnt cor.nections
_Openting , safety controls
_Motor pulleys & belts checked for proper tension " alignment
_Lubricate allmllg parts
_Ice IIlIcbine systems cleaned & production cycle checked
CON4BNTS:
........ ........ ......... *4__.. _ _ __ __....~.. ____.... _...... ..__...... ___ __ _....._ _...... _ _... __.. _. ____. _ __ _._ __.._ _. _ ._......... ........... ...................... ....... .......
TOTAL P.04
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Allen O. Zepper, Building Official
~
7 / IS- / ?"7
~ ~=#~
DATE:
June 26, 1997
....
SUBJECT: I.C.B.O. Annual Business Meeting
The Inspection Department would like to request funding to send two people to the
I.C.B.O. Annual Business Meeting in Phoenix the week of September 22nd. These
funds were included in the 1997 budget as follows:
Seminar and Conference $2,000.00
Housing 600.00
Education 400.00
Meals 200.00
$3,200.00
We have spent about $195.00 of these funds leaving a present balance of$3,005.00.
The anticipated costs would be as follows:
Registration (Before August 1st)
Lodging (includes 10.6% tax)
Airline Ticket
$ 325.00
840.00
304.00
$1,469.00 x2= ..$2.938.00
We have also budgeted $1,500.00 for other Professional Services which will cover
Jim Arend to fill in for us that week and leave enough excess for the rest of the year.
Thank You
tit
.
.
FINAL STRETCH INC.
P.O. Box 2171
Stillwater, MN. 55082
(612) 439-9706
Wednesday, June 25, 1997
~.Q.~-s D~p*
City of Stillwater lice Depal''tl"ent-
Mr.~Tim Thompson
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Tim:
This letier is in reference to our telephone conv6isation last week, regarding the
Gopher To Badger half marathon, taking place Sunday, August 17th, 1997. During our
discussion you had asked that I write a formalletier requesting use of Lowell Park for
the morning of the 17th. The plan for this year is to have registration, bus pickup to
Hudson, the Starting and Finish lines at Lowell Park. Next year the course will reverse,
so far we have had a tremendous response, with a portion of the proceeds going
towards the Stillwater and Hudson athletic departments. We would like to have a mini
health expo, during and after the race, for vendors that would like to participate in the
event. We would request an approximate ending time of 3:00 P.M., or what ever you
recommended. Thank you in advance for your consideration, if you have any
questions or suggestions please contact me.
Sincerely,
(NOTE) AS OF JULY 31st THE SOUTH END OF LOWELL PAR~ WILL BE
CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, AND I DON'T THINK THAT THE CONSTRUCTION
AROUND THE GAZEBO WILL BE COMPLETED BY AUG. 17th.
~/? ,C),,/ 9' ;7 .;,:' ~ 1-t-/ e
/l,.,} 71.:)',4/2-e .(~~1r:10
/""A-/Kb./ c-v/'/6 p1;t1. CT'UI;f k~Ae."""ei~'Z. 4611"'; 7'4,;"
.J
<
-"'f; u S/~j -;-4<" O/cJ fJ.R/~Oh /h, ~ ~&AJ/2"
-<
.
.
i.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
SUBJECT:
Noise from Air Conditioner Chiller
DATE:
July 11, 1997
The city has received several complaints from residents who live within a 5 block radius of City Hall
pertaining to the high frequency noise created by the Air Conditioning Chiller atop City Hall. I have
been working with the Architect, Mechanical Engineer and the Manufacturer (Trane) to find ways
to attenuate the noise. On Wednesday, July 9th, Dennis Vanasek, BWBR informed me that the
Mechanical Engineer and the Manufacturer's rep are trying to design a system to attenuate the noise
and hope to have something in place by July 18th.
In the meantime, I have had the system shut down as much as possible and especially during the
night. We are lucky that the weather has been relatively cool lately and hopefully we can get this
situation resolved ASAP.
~;<<
"7/ /'S'/'i?
-
Hi I'm Dr. Margaret Mitchelh:,your neighbor 'm intending to have my
chiropractic practice in my home starting his summ r, going no longer than
the following fall. I typically work with people fo hour. I see 2 people in
the morning and 4 in the afternoon 3 days per week. Please support me by
signing this petition. Thank you.
07 ~y /t7'J~ W. 5'7 tJ/tJ/^--It/.
~~y- ~~
~. 7t-~~
~~!ltt. ~ /0$" w,""'~:np
ao (j.) -~,i~
~f~ (tJtJ"1 sf. rlAMf ' '
~ I3uIuh '133 W. S:t,~ cu.e ~717A.
rfJ)L~t2 (NJoZ &.J. :5IW(is~. Sf/10)4/4/'1,u
-- ~ t?~ "t'" vJ' u- ~~. ~~I/hAz,
~ ~ 150 U), di. ~~,~~'?J
(~' ~
~~ ~ ~ 1}<91 ~ ~) WllLwilliD] mil.
CZy/( ~) ~
:I' ,()JJJo{ ~ J$trj
rq ltt--
~6tM
0Q t~ v,: f)L1)}
/241 !lmUfldSlJ')( COr
S'fil/wC/ fe;~ IfJAJ 5S1Ji'~
.....
\Y
12 A .
'), ~Jfl1111{(lLu&t CtttlA SIJM7t' M AJ~
18--50 ffm~~OY) ~. 7f/JJ~ Y'nrJ)
"'-
'.
/01-5' %n~u1tL~ 9r C%.,JwJ'lI
:.
~
o
rJ'J
'-rj
. s
s
<
.
Amundson
Circle
'"b..<o~ N1-
'- 0-..1 ~4)
'NLl ~-(~
a...JI
~r~>~
r,;-,~ - ~;
~..~..... ~ '\-- '.......~~.".'/
. ~ Ii.
" . Ii',
. I"~
,
I
\L.o....~L ,
~~~cDl
--[:J :
,
I
VI'-.L~ I
-0 CJ~I:,
I'
I
I
rn
=
CD
~
o
.
~
..
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
(---------
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
DA: July 11, 1997
RE: PUBLIC HEARING ON APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR A CHIROPRACTIC OFFICE USE IN A
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, MARGARET MITCHELL, APPLICANT (CASE NO.
SUP/97-32).
This request was heard by the planning commission at their meeting of 6-9-97. Many neighbors
expressed concern regarding the commercial use in the neighborhood, impacts on traffic and
children safety (see minutes).
,. The planning commission denied the request. The applicant appealed the denial and request
council reconsideration.
.
.
Recommendation: Decision on appeal.
Attachments: Letter of appeal, staff report and CPC minutes of6-9-97.
TRADITIONAL HEALING ARTS
Margaret Mitchell, D.C. _
Traditional Healing Arts
Dr. Margaret Mitchell
115 South Third Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
June 18, 1997
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
To Whom It May Concern:
.
I would like to appeal the June 9th decision regarding business occupancy at 1055 W, St.
Croix Avenue, officially denied on grounds of safety. I am the mother ofa young child
myself, and of course the safety of the children on that street is important to me. I plan to
get the road fixed, inform my patients of children playing, and be sure there is proper
signage to warn drivers as they are entering and exiting. I work three days a week, seeing
six patients a day, one per hour. There should be no risk to the children.
I would like to temporarily have my practice out of my home to be closer to my son, to
get on my feet financially, and to serve my patients in a nurturing environment. I am aware
that the people in the neighborhood haven't met me and may have some concerns about
who I am. So I am planning to be the one to attend the next meeting, and prior to that
give them the opportunity to meet me and ask any questions when I go around with the
petition.
Thank you for your reconsideration of this situation.
Sincerely,
.J..
.
Margaret Mitchell, D. C,
fcw
Healing with the Earth · 115 South 3rd Street. Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 351-7941
--
.
Ie
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUP/97-32
Planning Commission Date: June 9, 1997
Project Location: 1055 West St. Croix Avenue
Comprehensive Plan District: One Family Residential'
Zoning District: RA
Applicant's Name: Margaret Mitchell
Type of Application: Special Use Permit
Project Description: A Special Use Permit for a Chiropractic practice out of a residence.
Discussion: The request is to operate a Chiropractic business out of the above residence. The
applicant would see her patients by appointment only between the hours of 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.,
Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday in the summer. Winter days are 9:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday,
Wednesday and Friday.
There will be one office manager during the open hours. The Stillwater City Code - Chapter 31,
Subdivision 11, One Family District (RA) states:
e. Within a main building, the office of a surgeon, physician, clergymen, architect, engineer,
attorney, similar professional person or licensed personal service practitioner who resides
in the main a building and employs in the office not more than one nonresident office or
laboratory assistant. '
Parking is provided on the north and east sides of the house. The applicant will provide the
Commission with a Site Plan at the meeting.
Conditions of Approval:
1, No exterior signage.
2. All parking shall be on-site with the maximum of two nonresident cars at one time.
3, Special Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission upon complaint.
4. Special Use Permit is issued to Margaret Mitchell and not transferable.
5. No additional employees other than the office manager.
Recommendation: Approval as conditioned.
Findings: The proposed use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare and will be in harmony with the general purpose of this ordinance.
Attachments: Application form
CPC Action 6-9-97: +7-0 denial
Case No; :o;~/~;?V-
Date Filed:
Fee Paid: 70
Receipt No. : S~ ;)-~7
PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FORM
--
ACTION REQUESTED:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _ Certificate of Compliance
CITY OF STILLWATER --tConditional or Special Use Permit
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET _ Design Review
STILL WATER, MN 55082 _ Planned Unit Development
Variance
_ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ Zoning Amendment
Subdivision
Resubdivision
Total Fee
FEE(I)
$70
,r.;: '--
~~70
$270
$70
$300
$300
S 1 00+$50/10t
$50
:j' '7 t}
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material
submitted in connection with any application.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
/Of!/ W 5f. Ct1 /'
Assessor's ~~cel No. '
o ~tr~ ch/rt'1 yrt-C /-/c p re<-c It~-€-
Description of Project
"J hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all
respectSJ to the best of my knowledge and belief true and correct. Jfurther certify J will comply with the permit
if it is granted and used"
Property Owner :ltVLCI. fun jA,vv{ S c'Y'-' Representative ~~ d. ~~~ . Mailing _
Address _ Mailing Address :1 /J _ _ ' _&, ~ 5 r: :::i:t z.ob
S-/c-/1 ~~ I MI", '.?Sl?S'J- Telephone No.
, Telephone No. If 31- 'f'lfr;O
c: ~~~
Signature Signature \( ~c . \....~
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
~-~-
~
,./"
Lot Size (dimensions) _ x _ "ToGI building floor Area sq. ft.
Land Area Existing sq. ft.
Height of Buildings: Stories Feet Proposed sq. ft.
Principal ~ ~ Paved Impervious Area sq. ft
.DDITIONAL ENGINEERING COSTS MAYBE REQUIRED AS PART OF APPLICATION REVIEW
Revised 9/19/95
TRADITIONAL HEALING ARTS
Margaret Mitchell, D.C. _
Traditional Healing Arts
Dr, Margaret Mitchell
115 South Third Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
May 23, 1997
City Hall: Susan Fitzgerald
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
To Whom It May Concern:
.
I am writing regarding my plan to move my Chiropractic business to my present home at
1055 W, St. Croix Avenue in Stillwater. I work three days per week from 9:30 a,m. to
6:30 p,m. This summer those days will be Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays, I employ
one office manager during those hours. I see one patient at a time, so with me, my office
manager, and my patients crossing coming and going, we would rarely have more than 4
people or cars there at once. There is parking space on the north and east sides of the
house.
We will have a representative at the June 9th meeting. Thank you for this consideration,
/'...../
~incerely, .! .
(t'lx C'~
-7 )j b>:;8Y):- G:.iu:..L{ /;J.C
Margaret Mitchell, D. C, ~
fcw
.
Healing with the Earth · 115 South 3rd Street · Stillwater, MN 55082
(612) 351-7941
-
.
.
",f,
Ron Anderson of the Stillwater Water Department noted that the existing
water service to the property is a 3/4 inch line and would not be adequate
for additional living quarters.
Mr. Russell explained staff's recommendation that the proposed use needs
additional study and development of design guidelines. Specifically, he
said the factors outlined in paragraph five of staff's recommendation need
to be studied and guidelines developed.
Mr. Rheinberger moved to deny the request; motion died for lack of a
second. Mr. Roetman, seconded by Mr. Rheinberger, moved to continue the
request in order to study the impact and address the issues as outlined by
staff. Motion passed 6-1, with Mr. Wiedner opposed.
Case No. SUP/97-32 A special use permit for a chiropractic practice from
a residence located at 1055 W. St. Croix Avenue in the RA, One-Family
Residential District. Judd Orff, representing Nina Amundson, applicant.
Terry Christianson was present representing Dr. Margaret Mitchell. He
explained that Dr. Mitchell's current office space lease is expiring and she
would like to operate her practice from the residence at 1055 W. St. Croix
Ave., which she is renting, until she can find a new, permanent office
space.
Rich Cummings, 1060 Amundson Drive, introduced a delegation of
neighbors opposed to the request. Mr. Cummings noted that St. Croix
Avenue is an unimproved street. He said parking is an issue, as is the fact
th.at the request is to operate a home business from rental property.
Speaking in opposition to the request were Rick Kuula, 1241 Amundson
Circle; Marge Jordahl, 1115 Amundson Drive; Allan Downey; and Jeff
Hands, 1135 Amundson Drive. Concerns centered on the potential for
additional traffic; the fact that the area is heavily used by children; and
the fact that the street is unimproved. Shelly Michaelis, 1341 Dallager
Court, a realtor, noted there is a lot of commercial property available for
rent.
Mr. Christianson said Dr. Mitchell only sees one patient an hour, and her
office is only open from 9:30 to 6:30 Monday through Wednesday. He said
the doctor has set herself a deadline of Oct. 1 for finding a permanent
location for her practice.
II
.
I.
Mr. Roetman asked if the ordinance has any stipulation regarding the use
of a rental residence for a home-based business. Mr. Russell said the
ordinance has no such stipulation.
Mr. Fontaine said he was concerned because of the unimproved road and
difficult access to the property.
Mr. Rheinberger, seconded by Mrs. Bealka, moved to deny the request based
on the safety issue; motion passed unanimously.
Case No. V /97-33 A variance to the side yard setback (30 feet required,
, 9 feet proposed) for construction of a '2 x , 6 deck at 924 N. Everett St.
in the RB, Two Family Residential District. Scott and Jody Stoltz,
applicant.
The Stoltzes were present for the discussion. Mrs. Stoltz explained they
built the deck and then received a letter stating they needed a permit and
a variance. She said the placement of the deck eliminates a previous water
problem, and she said she had signatures from neighbors, none of whom
were opposed to the deck.
Mr. Valsvik moved approval, noting the deck improves the appearance of
the house but reminding the Stoltzes they should have come before the
Planning Commission before constructing the deck. Mr. Rheinberger
seconded the motion; all in favor.
Case No. PUD/97-34 A planned unit development for the construction of
seven single-family, two-story homes with shared driveways at 1303-
1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential District. John
Roettger, applicant.
Case No. SUB/97-35 A resubdivision for lots 16-22, Block 1, Churchill's
Second Addition, and the north 30 feet of lot 15, Block 1, and the south 27
feet of Lot 23, Block 1, ChurchiWs Second Addition into seven single-
family lots at 1303-1373 S. Fifth St. in the RB, Two-Family Residential
District. John Roettger, applicant.
Mr. Roettger and Shelley Michaelis were present for the discussion. Mr.
Wiedner excused himself from the discussion as his firm has represented
Mr. Roettger.
Mr. Roettger said his plans have changed. He will be constructing six,
rather than seven homes, as he has been unable to come to an agreement to
purchase the additional property that would enable the seventh unit. He
..
-
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Klayton H, Eckles
City Engineer
,/ ' .
/'.~ ---
SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Croixwood Boulevard
Rehabilitation Project
Job No, 9724
DISCUSSION:
The public hearing for the Croixwood Boulevard Rehabilitation Project is scheduled
for July 15th, I have attached a copy of the feasibility report, the letter to the residents that
accompanied the notice, and letters received from residents since their notification,
The main thrust of the comments from residents is that the assessments are too high
because this is a high traffic street and that the City should pay for the costs of the road repair
because the overlay did not last 20 years and the City snowplowing operations destroyed the
street.
-
Croixwood Boulevard does have more traffic than an average local street and is 42
feet which is wider than the standard 32 foot wide street. Regarding the life of the overlay
done in the mid-1980s, a simple one inch overlay can not be expected to last 20 years, It
appears that the residents and the City received good value from the overlay project with 12
years of life gained from a $55,000 street project. The issue concerning the damage caused
by snowplowing operation was also raised. The damage presented in the pictures presented
by the residents shows scrape marks in the surface of the blacktop. These scrape marks are
areas where the blade of the grader removed the top seal coat layer off the surface of the
blacktop, Deeper one inch holes are the result of frost action. Council may recall that during
1996 we received a two inch rainfall in January which devastated many of the streets in the
City, The rain soaked into the cracks and microfissors in the blacktop, then froze overnight
causing fractures in the blacktop, Croixwood Boulevard was one of the streets in town that
was badly damaged by this phenomenon,
Council may wish to consider a reduction in the assessment amount due to the excess
width of Croixwood Boulevard, As mentioned above, Croixwood Boulevard is
approximately 10 feet wider than the standard city street. Giving a credit for the excess
width \vould result in a 24% reduction in the assessment. The assessed amount would be
reduced from $95,000 to $72.400, The follo\ving table shows a comparison of the proposed
assessment compared with other recent street rehabilitation projects.
-
Project Year A verage Per Lot Assessment
Croixwood Boulevard 1997 $1.750
Croixwood Boulevard 1985 $602
1996 Street Improvements 1996 $2,692
Pine Street Reconstruction 1996 $3.340
1995 Street Improvements 1995 $1.805
Northland Drive 1994 $1.400
Sherburne/S, 6th Street 1994 $3,300
As can be seen from the numbers above the Croixwood Boulevard project whether
considered on its own. or a with the thin overlay done in 1985. falls well in the realm of assessment
rates in recent years if the neighborhood is given a credit for extra width,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council hold the required public hearing, consider the proposed
revised assessment rates. and if Council desires. pass a resolution directing the engineer to prepare
plans and specifications,
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to proceed with the project they should pass a motion adopting Resolution
No, 97- . ORDERING IMPROVEMENT & PREPARATION OF PLANS &
SPECIFICATIONS, FOR CROIXWOOD BOULEVARD REHABILITATION PROJECT
(JOB NO. 9724).
t
...
-
e
-
-
.
.
'-....---"
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT & PREP ARA TION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS,
FOR CROIXWOOD BOULEVARD REHABILITATION
PROJECT (JOB NO. 972.t)
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 17th day of June. 1997. fixed
a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of Croixwood Boulevard:
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing
was given. and the hearing was held thereon on the 15th day of July. 1997. at which time all
persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the
15th day of July. 1997,
! The City of Stillwater Engineering Department is hereby designated as the engineer for
this improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 15th day of July. 1997,
Jay Kimble. Mayor
Attest:
Morli Weldon. City Clerk
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
June 13, 1997 _
FROM:
Klayton H, Eckles, City Engineer
I~ Ii v'"/
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report
Croixwood Boulevard Rehabilitation Project
Job No, 9724
INTRODUCTION:
At the June 3, 1997 meeting Council directed the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility study
to consider a rehabilitation project for Croixwood Boulevard from County Road 5 to Northland
Boulevard, The following is the completed feasibility report. The report will cover the background
information on the project area, the proposed project improvements, project cost, possible financing
methods, project timeline, followed by recommendations.
BACKGROUND:
Croixwood Boulevard was constructed in the mid 1970s. It was constructed to act as a
collector street, which means greater than average traffic volumes were anticipated. In 1984/85 the
City completed an overlay project because the surface of the blacktop had badly deteriorated. At that
time residents were required to participate in 45 percent of the total project cost. The City policy at
that time required 100 % assessments except in cases where a street did not last its anticipated 20 year
life span. In the past three years we have seen Croxiwood Boulevard rapidly deteriorate, This
deterioration is caused by several factors including unusual winter weather conditions, high traffic
volumes, marginal drainage, and questionable mix design, In 1996 the City spent over $10,000 for
temporary patching and maintenance on Croixwood Boulevard. The present condition would require
the City to make similar expenditures over the next 12 months to keep this street passable,
e
IMPROVEMENTS:
An inspection of Croixwood Boulevard has been completed, Inspection has indicated that the
top layer of blacktop is the primary location of the failure. Therefore, the primary rehabilitation
would involve the milling off of the top 3" of blacktop and reinstalling new blacktop, When the new
blacktop is installed, additional crown will be added to the street for improved drainage from the street
into the curb, Inspection also found that a limited amount of curb should be replaced and there is a
need for storm sewer at the intersection of Fairlawn Drive and Croixwood Boulevard. The estimated
total project cost including construction, engineering, inspection, finance, and 10% contingencies is as
follows:
-
-
e
e
ITEM
Storm Sewer Extension
Street Rehabilitation
COST
$ 24,500,00
105,500,00
TOTAL
$130,000.00
PROJECT FINANCING:
This project would be subject to the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, The
methods of funding in the current City policy include assessments and City contribution, The
formulas used for determining the assessment rate assumes the City pays for reconstruction items (to
subsidize (he cost of increasing the life of our streets), and the residents abutting a project pay for
rehabilitation, Using this methodology, the resulting charge to the residents would be approximately
$95,015, This amounts to 73 % of the total project cost.
There are 52 lots in the project area; if we use the "per unit" method of assessing we would
end up with 31 full lots and 21 "half" lots (corner lots), The resulting assessment would be
approximately $2,290,00 per lot and $1,145,00 per corner lot.
PROJECT TIMELINE:
If Council accepts the Engineer's report at the June 17th Council meeting, Council could order
a public hearing for the July 15th meeting, This would yield the an estimated timeline as follows:
Item
Estimated Time of Comvletion
Hold Public Hearing
A warding of Bids
Start Construction
Project Completion
Assessment Hearing
July 15
August 5
August 26
September 30
October 6
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the information gathered and presented in the feasibility report, it appears that this
project is both technically and financially feasible, The project could be completed as presented in a
cost effective manner and would provide value to the residents in the area.
It is recommended that Council proceed with the project.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Should Council accept the report and proceed with the project they should pass a motion
adopting Resolution No, 97- , RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING FOR
HEARING ON THE PROPOSED STREET REHABILITATION PORJECT OF CROIXWOOD
BOULEV ARD (JOB NO. 9724)
~iI~~te~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
e
June 27. 1997
Resident
Subject:
Public Hearing on Croixwood Boulevard Street Rehabilitation Project
Job No, 9724
Dear Resident:
Attached you will find a Public Hearing Notice otlicially notifying you of the Public Hearing
scheduled for July 15th for the purpose of discussing possible street rehabilitation of Croixwood
Boulevard along your property, If approved by the City Council. this project would be designed
by the city and constructed in the late summer and fall of this year.
e
The city has completed a Feasibility Study which discussed the rehabilitation improvements, the
costs of the rehabilitation and financing methods, Croixwood Boulevard was constructed in the
mid 1970s. It was constructed to act as a collector street. which means greater than average
traffic volumes were anticipated, In 1984/85 the City completed an overlay project because
the surface of the blacktop had badly deteriorated, At that time residents were required to
participate in 45 percent of the total project cost. The City policy at that time required 100%
assessments except in cases where a street did not last its anticipated 20 year life span. In the
past three years we have seen Croixwood Boulevard rapidly deteriorate, This deterioration is
caused by several factors including unusual winter weather conditions, high traffic volumes,
marginal drainage, and questionable mix design, In 1996 the City spent over $10,000 for
temporary patching and maintenance on Croixwood Boulevard, The present condition would
require the City to make similar expenditures over the next 12 months to keep this street
passable.
The scope of the project would involve the milling off of the top 3" of blacktop and reinstalling
new blacktop, When the new blacktop is installed. additional crown will be added to the street for
improved drainage from the street into the curb, A limited amount of curb would be replaced and
a storm sewer placed at the intersection of Fairlawn Drive and Croixwood Boulevard.
.1
--------
rl.',Ll. 216 ~JORTH FOURTH ST!lI.'NATER \111\JNESOT.'\ JJC82 PHm.JE 612J3Hi121
-
e
e
Croixwood Boulevard Resident
June 27. 1997
Page Two
This project would be subject to the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, The
methods of funding in the current City policy include assessments and City contribution, The
formulas used for determining the assessment rate assumes the City pays for reconstruction items
(to subsidize the cost of increasing the life of our streets). and the residents abutting a project pay
for rehabilitation, Using this methodology. the resulting charge to the residents \-vould be
approximately $95.015, This amounts to 73% of the total project cost.
The project area has 52 lots that would be assessed. 31 full lots and 21 "half" lots (corner lots),
With this "per unit" method of assessing the resulting assessment would be approximately
$2.290,00 per full lot and $1.145.00 per corner lot.
The hearing for this proposed project is your opportunity to gain additional information
regarding this project and voice your comments to the council prior to council making a final
decision on whether or not to proceed with this project. You may participate in the hearing by
attending and voicing your comments or by sending a letter to the City Council prior to the
meeting,
s~'nc rely,
L 0"
j
~.
Klayton Eckles
City Engineer
KE:dfw
Enclosure
Terry and Christine Rodgers
2504 Croixwood Blvd.
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Stillwater City Council
City Hall
216 North Fourth St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
July7,1997
Council Members,
We were upset to receive the June 27 letter from the City Engineer outlining the
assessments for the rehabilitation of Croixwood Boulevard, We strongly feel that the
residents along Croixwood Blvd. should not be assessed for this project. Our
objections to your plans include the following:
1) The 1984/1985 overlay project should have lasted longer, The fact that it did not
last for at least the standard 20 years as indicated in your letter shows that
something was done incorrectly right from the beginning. (For example, having
this work done in November rather than in warmer weather,)
2) The city also contributed to the poor condition of Croixwood Blvd. by scraping ice
from the streets with heavy equipment during the winter of 1995/1996.
Photographs are enclosed that show how this scraping tore up pieces of paving
from the street in front of our house. Similar scrape marks can be seen at many
other locations along the street.
3) Your letter mentions the high traffic volumes on Croixwood Boulevard. This street
is a major route for many residents of the Croixwood subdivision and for those
who use it as a short cut from highway 12 to Cub, Target, and other destinations,
There is also a lot of heavy truck traffic making use of the same short cut. To ask
the home owners along Croixwood Blvd. to foot the bill for wear and tear caused
by all this traffic is grossly unfair. Upgrading this street to handle more traffic does
not add to our property value. The excessive traffic makes Croixwood Blvd. a less
desirable place to live.
4) Finally, the logic behind requiring residents abutting a street project to pay 73% of
the project cost is completely faulty, For example, this will be the second
assessment we have paid during our 20 years as residents of Croixwood, People
who live in Oakridge Court, just behind our house, for example, have never paid a
street assessment, as far as I know, although they use Croixwood Blvd. every
day. We know that city streets need to be maintained and repaired, but all city
residents benefit from this work, To ask the residents along major thoroughfares
to bear most of the cost is very unfair. Two assessments in a little over ten years
is unbelievable!
-
e
-
e
e
i.
~"
- 2 -
To recap, our objections to this assessment are that the city played a major role in the
deterioration of Croixwood Blvd., this street receives more than the normal amount of
traffic expected for a residential street, and the funding method for street rehabilitation
is unfair to residents of the abutting property, Please take these facts into account
during your consideration of Croixwood Blvd, street improvements on July 15, 1997.
Sincerely,
---
,
I . i I _-
f- -I --~-- l../'_-' f'.c, ':-{ ...:~:./-'\.~.
'-.,1 ,/v'"^"",,.-:s "../,~ '- -
~_ c '_ 1__ C
- :- -4'"
Terry Rodgers
Christine Rodgers
,<~;~,~.:'~~F:y/.t":~itN/.2~~~1:~ri~t;tG~~.. y;t:~W:" ;~J!i~~J\:st:)jI~~~i~~1:1;,k;~/. ;t;
"..' ,. " ''''I.""",\"~",'p,~...",\:"..,,~..,~,.,,. .;\.;r,)' , ",.t.,'I'J.A"".,)'w.1'!i'.'.,'J....,t.,'
';:) '.' ,;:,,;i :,_,< :" ~"I~':'~'i{:*i.\;r~~'ilV,1 ~1',-\.f1i;;"/'" : :.",::: 'iJ,;>~ ~ ~~rf~~;!.:I i'" \~( ~i~...rl}i
.~~,:?:6;~i!<:;!~;~~J'~?~~}?~'" · ,'\; ...It,.~?!':~;,'':');:.}::,;! ;;~[1~~~i:~\~n:t~~~ltii~}r
:..::~;~ if:iH:v~'\~!~j)~'~~\{~~~:': >'~'{ ;,'; :0':; :.;' :. ~~j' i,:,;~!t~~~J: 'i~~.:i4'~~1'?:
:.,:~..,'~;~::i;.;:'.-k:1J,~i,:'f"Ii"~~.fi:1'~'",,,:. i". ,;' ,.;' '.':::;<"}-'i':"~~~"'1\i':J' . ri;~'l\.:{.j~:';.
.!t.;,;.'\...d;'p..'f.~:rl\:':iSj':~'\'5::;~ .i,.~'~..,,: \,.'..' .~ .1:"':"':;;,~~,M\~\J'~f:"'~" l~' I "",..:r.,I,,o/;#.'
""".I._,.~,~., ...'.I,,,on.., ," '...~.l ""~\'..":;C",,, .."',, .'..,',~',
:'t~~,~~,,):. "t,. ~...!."I...;.:~'*_~...:~: 1"1.0:' )l- '''''I....,. ~.. .~:~. ;~\,(,A~~g~\~li_~.-~ '(~' }~. 11 " ;;~'~'~J~'I..:;i'..;
, '.... .....<", ,._,'...' ,", ,., '...." ,,'" ,,:J. "'.,... ~... . '" . ",
::r,'(,:;"""J.~.;~,:,WJ.~,:;,"!~,'~ J.: ;'.' :.':'1 ~~i.~i"~~L.:;,l~I~.;~t.:.lr~}-,~"Mi~'l~.., . i'~\ /' ~';~4~~~1"~.'.1 Y.,.
.. "",=.;'J.,,:,'~'''1,t~,f''/'' ;l"!',, '.:'I{:':<,:., "l"...~t,'1-;o~ls.,"..r>;\I-;'\"~~"'.'): 1&'< \ . .,.':j",')';'"
-!:';'.$,h'!t;I~!~},:' : 'oj;."!',; /";,,:,.;' ::;.,,;1 ~!!d,,1.,!::~;;;,~:f.',;~.;;~,1':;~;1. i j oJ ,J'~{I~;J;.r'}K{
!< .'1.;'." ""f'.' ~,~ 'r" r. 'f ..' '. .I."".,..'6,n.". .~",',J.."~/. ."..,>1~. .,~' .' ~i'1, "'lr."'~i'''' .'...,
, .. .".~ ,..,' .'. 1 . ,.,"\..,',.,'<,'~.. ~.~, ,~: ,~~ ,.. V'. ' . '",,' ,
~~~:':.~{"".:4..,,":~;.::i.l... ~;tr' _, . ;~..>.~,\~.'i.I:~1',~'6',~...~\~6~u\~~1.;~~(~l~ri;.'f.J}, ~'~ . ~-. .;;j\~/~;il~~;{ ~~;/t.\:;::
~",..., .,.:....,_.."... (',',. '..r....''',."",cN,..''.q,;;..., ..'''','' ,';,'" ;'ifoJ"-J~
.....;;NI':.,!.~..:"',:I, ":., .:.<':, !1;~'1I~~~~i -e;'k\."~,;r,,;,,,!;';', ,,', :/0'; f'.{.>'..'dh'
,::;',\'l;'(.,'fl"h';\ .,,:' ~,.4;~;,;:'~~i'.{~.j.. ,o(;~;..;;';~'ll"''r1iJI''/,,,~rt,''XI' ''R;;;...:j.l'';~
\~'. ~.J"_;"'1.,ttlf.,I.'.:;."\'" ;i,", .,..r' ".i''''',<oJ:' ~;b,tf!;'l'''!:.''''{'''''1.?i.~~''''4. ..y,..g.'l"/~;~~
);:\,,1',' OZ",",..<!, '. ..,., ,"'. ".~,i'. ,.." ',,~.;(>"J~j ,;,,^ ,~,':'.i ... ,f>~;"r. :'...,. ~..;. ,
~" f'J,::" :,,~:"':' ,:/'.; '"I iW'r~: ljft..>......:~~'!i.'i:4; ,itf. ~{{(~'~;H;r.~,'"
~~:t~1#;.~8f;li ij"'i't$Z~~i !l1I\,&~~~~
;~:/,,: ,II:, :~: :'~". ("~;:'~~::~~"'\~~ I:."mii~ ' . f ~';:W~:;i~;.; .~14: ?,~I~fil1.'
";i-';.~"; ';."! ':!,;,; :l!,..l\',':(.".<i:" ;(,,,,';.>,' ,':' f.~,!;I,':f'!:;J'.' fi}i;,; ,\!:>~'ic~=,
:,\,~"':,:"'.I....,,:;,;,,,~I~\(,I('~.."'!";. "I.t!':' , ..'~t'.i.-i;..>tf,r'''' :"'\f$,1~~'" (l.'~~
,;,,!\'?~#'~\~~>~~J~75Mi~ ,'r '. ~'i !,,;~>~;.,:/j,~.. ,;' i{~\4li..;r~!{;'ri~:#W1.J{t'~ .
";,:.:.'::;t'J~ '. ;t~:::~,\.j.\I':~j:);=:t~:\~'.:~jl'~~'~f.!.\.~~., . ,;:,'~'" :(.~l,t~~:I,~~~@"~:ltt.".,~\~~~.!.~ ~ '.
.,~,. 'I" ," ,,' ..,.,,' "'.t.,~' ....'~,. ,-, ,~" :.:'~.t"',l'~' '':i''l~'fl:'f~ ,.'" 'J.
" t 1.'1/ f; ~'l.,;-;' ~~ ,\\~~, :..l:/~ ,;f':",';.;~ .:;. c, hit ~~1~r:,i't \~;~\';:;.f'))~)J L~' 'Yi.t~~'t~.' ~~I~ ~.~.
. .. "J," ,"'(~ ~I'''~'~ :. -."'t" ,,' .. (I. '.....'),~ ,I' "..', ' ,.... 4 ....'... ,\..-...~~ '....F' .. ......' ,,,,,..\ .ft..';""',,,' ,.. ".'\",'
:~)'~~-i:'~ ;~~:. \"I'\~'l;i:e...~ .~.~~ ..,\~);Ja\.'~".-.f~i-:;" ,r:,': '1"\,;1": :' ,~.,/~'.\ .L.;I,.{.,'.. ;~;-;..'t~~.;":',:~i~lr~\!\l;.~I.!.t.4"J.~;~~:~" ~1fr.1i."" :
.f_,..r,...........,.J:f - ....'......' ....i~'...~,I'lL;,'..1\ ..,~..',...J.'It 4:...~~;--:.":.."":,.,,,~,;:.,.~..~......,,)..-t:"'---<':.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~-~.t'~~
;.' .t,.....;,:"."....: ,..u.,1.:'').j''11:-,-I;'l,'C'"'' ,.;.,." . ..'f..l',(.:..,.I~."~"L.~,-..:.'..t!.;.....\.Jl.,r~,...:r.I....f ......, ..... ""1'
, ' , (' . _,',.. II" '. . '" '. '\I v" ,Il;, .," . ~ ',.' ,'0" "I." i"I ..'r' " ,~.,'" ..',", .""1-,,\" "',:"
;;'''';:'4.,:;'' ".',~:;:, .,......,Jo'~!..l'~. tir. ,{t,',.,.., .",~'l';';\"'.'~;:r"i" :'~":~"I'i"'\'\'r'i'F": ' "~''';-'
~:(:: X. ~,;~:'1.~j\f<.;:~;i,!~}}'.~;,:~ ':,:\{/' r'1~i~ ~1';~~(~~~d.1:;I~i};c;2;t~~t~?:(,~~\:~~ ~<;~!t~1'
':r,::~;':>;.:..,i;';;~i~~:':i"~,':,~,lh..;;;! '(.' ;.I:"',,'(,W;:~;t\~~:Vi,f1t4:~,::!.At1::~}l~i'lt';IV~I. ~~l~
i{i~~~ri~~}t.I~i~IIJ'lfI~'!lil'
(.
"
".
'\
"
) :~.~,:,'i
'"\~ ..~'...
, ,
.
e
e
.
'-'=
I
.
Ci ty Hall
216 North Fourth
Stillwater j\IN 55082
r .;'~E:; .~.. -.:
! jUt n .; ;997
i - --
~-=-=--- - - - - .- - .
To whom it may concern:
In your letter dated June 27, 1997, two issues are discussed. The
first issue deals with the history and condition of CroLxwood
Boulevard and the second deals with city policy and financing. I take
strong exception to both issues as stated in that letter.
As to the policy issue, everyone uses the streets and, in my opinion,
everyone should pay for them. Costs incurred for street
maintenance, repair, rehabilitation ete. should be paid from the
revenues collected in taxes... not from assesments to adjacent
property o\vners.
However, even if I were to agree with the policy, the residents along
CroLxwood Boulevard should not have to pay for rehabilitation of a
street that was destroyed by city workers. The city should be
responsible for 100% of the costs incurred by their workers
negligence. The previous statement is rather strong and I will now
explain the facts and details leading to that statement.
Paragraph two of your letter is inaccurate. Croixwood Boulevard was
constructed in the early 1970s, not the "mid 1970s". I moved here in
1973 and it was blacktop at that time. It's true that the street had
high traffic volumes and deteriorated quickly. The overlay project,
as stated in the letter, was done during the cold weather
months(November/December) with little chance of good adhesion to
the existing surface. In other words, it had poor chance of success
due to the timing of the project dictated by city hall. The
deterioration of the street may have been the result of weather
condition, high traffic volumes, marginal drainage and questionable
mix design but the main reason are the facts concerning the time
frame of 1995/1996 which are not mentioned in the letter.
In 1995, very late in the year, there was a driving rain storm that
occurred while temperatures were well below freezing. The rain
quickly froze while strongly adhering itself to the blacktop surface.
Instead of sanding and/or salting, the city brought in heavy
equipment to scrape the ice off the street. As they were scraping,
they removed ice and blacktop (in large "chunks"). With chunks
missing, subsequent rain and snow exacerbated the problem. City
Hall was notified of the situation at that time via a telephone call but,
to my knowledge, nothing was done.
e
After destroYing the street in 1995, it was neglected in 1996 leading
to the deterioration and repairs outlined in 1997. The deterioration
of Croixwood Boulevard was a direct result of actions taken by the
city and the city, not the residents along Croixwood Boulevard,
should bear the financial responsibility for the repairs and
rehabilitation caused by those actions.
I suspect that the repairs stated in paragraph three would be a fine
solution to the problem, but even then, if done improperly, will be
less than adequate.
Asking or demanding that residents pay for such repairs would be
analogous to having "the city" rake the snow off of my roof and while
doing it, inadvertently remove all my shingles and then expect me to
pay for the repair. Please take a look at the facts and take
responsibility for the mistakes that were made. Maybe you were not
aware of these facts, but now that you are, take the time and the
responsibily to act appropriately.
Thank you,
Raymond L Poskozim
r---',
, ). I . .
\' 1<"// /
" /.21'h.< ~ /'/, ,'- -;:::;<'-C;C.L~'" (.._....
"- .' .-....._-::..,....~ ---,,/, /' '- /
/ '" I
/~ ' '_/,i
-', ( 1 "- r-
'I I 'L" \'" '. -
/.,! ~.j ,jL,(1:..' ;,:.--;;_ ... '-'~" \ '-\.::--7-t.. 1-"\
~ . <-=:) ,
e
.
.
-
I-
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
,~
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director /~
DA: July 11,1997
RE: CONTINUED HEARING OF REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO BLUFF
SETBACK REQUIREMENT AT 2718 BOOM ROAD (CASE NO. V/97-28)
The applicant has requested a continuance of this item until the Council meeting of August 18,
1997, to consider additional remodeling options,
Recommendation: Continue item to council meeting of8-16-97.
.
.
-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF NEWLY ANNEXED LAND
The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain:
1. Amending. The Stillwater City Code Chapter 31, Zoning, Subd. 6(h) is changed to
hereafter read as follows:
"h. Property newly annexed to the City will have the zoning classification
Agricultural Preservation, (A-P) and be subject to the regulations of that district."
2. Savings. In all other ways the City Code will remain in full force and effect.
3. Effective Date. This Ordinance will be effective after its passage and publication
according to law.
Enacted by the City Council ofthe City of Stillwater this 1 yh day of July, 1997.
CITY OF STILLWATER
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Modi Weldon, Clerk
-
.
I.
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM: Steve Russell V'
Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Stillwater Annexation Area AUAR Approval
DISCUSSION:
The revised AUAR document including mitigation plan will be distributed
separately Monday.
,
"
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FR: Steve Russell, Community Development Director
v
DA: July 14, 1997
RE: RESPONSES TO DRAFT AUAR COMMENTS AND REVISED MITIGATION PLA.l~
Attached to this memo is a copy of the comments from the public on the draft AUAR. An AUAR
cover sheet precedes the comments. Each comment has been responded to (the transportation
comments will be presented at the meeting). A cover sheet II response to comments precedes the
response.
The third section is the revised AUAR Mitigation Plan. Again a cover sheet precedes the Mitigation
Plan. A final section includes changes to the text of the AUAR. That section is label IV text
changes.
The four sections will be added to or modify the draft AUAR and comprise the final AUAR. The
next step in the process is to approve the AUAR for submittal to the EQB for review and approval.
After EQB approval, the AUAR returns to the city council for adoption. This should happen at your
meeting of August 19,1997.
Recommendation: Approval of final expansion AUAR for submittal to the Minnesota
Environmental Quality Board for approval.
Attachments: AUAR comments and responses
Modified Mitigation Plan and report text.
..
.
'.
AUAR
I COMMENTS .
I
.
,
~C/26/1997 14:45
430::::310
CITV OF STILLt<!ATER
PAGE 82
..
cYf<
- -- --- -- ------- -'--.--
Mr. Klayton Eckles
Cit)' Engineer
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwlt(l~r. }.,.tN 55082-489S
~-
~~ 1'<:0
; ~; c'yZ) fbv{,,~
June 23.1997
Re: Comments on the Final AUAR Document
Stillwater A.nnt:xatiol1 Area
AI (Sr<.A
f - &'36 I '"5 H
Dear Mr. Eckles:
,
TIlt Twin Cities Chaptct of Trout Unlimited crCTU) has reviewed the Sti
dated 5/6/97 and submit" the following comments,
Stream Flow
.
rTCTU restates its concern that thi$"AUAR' doc"time'Oi-reHe-saln"lL{s(exc}usiVely' Qil' linlite'd eXistingdaii,:j~'itS' ~..':,
._";"._~..;;-";"--'- .--. .~..~~. ._..::....:..:..... -.-:~.,-'....;.'.:...;. "'~' i '.:~ :'..,"~i::':"'._'"",-,,,,,:",,,,, - -.-- ...::._. ._.-'.--_..~._- ..- .-." _.. . ,"
* I t ~~t~~p.~~~[~f~.H!~.I:a~~:9f,p!.??~~~?,~e~~lo~m;n~,.~~}h~ q~~~~~~~~d.~~!~~~(~.u.rf~~e .~s.~j~~6~.~o..y~t~~)~!n Bro..,,:.n's~' ,
Creek;'i,"statEoesigniiW TioutStre;'m"'This data c;timate.s that 30-50% of the base flow of the lower reac.hes of
:}~_::;;i. .:.....-.........,.:...:~.i...:.; -"'''''' ..........~"o#,. ....-_.~- .. .
Brown's Creek. comcS from ground\vater seepage from the St. Peter sandstone formfltion (page 20). The ~-1a)' 1997
~ \ \ '::~~~~~lf~ili9.I?.?j~€~1~~~;;~:C.ZT~~:~~~~!i~~~~~qi~~;I~~~;l:~~~~~t~.~E~~~e}If.e~!:=~~es:~r ~h~;'!~
7s,rr~r'i:~l~~riip2~g~~tO~Q~~b~efl~fw. fro!i))he~}>fwii~g-'f.fh~_en:)97.4'~1l~qU1f~!-~~Thlsji~~S)~~1~_:~9ti~fc~:that ,i~'.
..;.:--.:::::-~,t.~t~"'\'~I:'''i;~.Tr,,~'.~J';';;~I-~'7~:~~:~.::~~,,' ;_-,~~_.-_ _ _,__",_v"_-:rI"""~~,,,,,,,/,,,-,,,,,,~""':~7:'~:'~-~"'."""'''~~:.:: -..-r_~7......... ,...... -.......-,.-::....... ...... -'::. :..:.:. ........
; th~ .AQAlUM!l.@~~_.~Uhe_so~~~f?!..::~~ .~ ~,,~":!~<:,~s.~pe!.:.~~~':1t~ ~unlclplLl.wcll.(pgs..5? -5j). 1$ page 20 il1'
~\~ ~{~fif~;~~~~~*~~l~~;}~~~&:~~!jit
~o.!Fvle~~{ ic:rP, ~~i.eYes .tha~ I~sufticie.rit effoI1. ~as been ~ade tOIO~~!lfy ,w.!le~hers~<::h, aJarge withdrawal. of : ... ~
:'.C".~ '\: "..::~,:...";;J."",,''''';..1;..<, ,.>.~'.: _, ,,:-:-'r.,~:";;"" ;:" _ ',' ..,:.,:;)".,.'. ~': ..',.;,'::'... : .-; .':c....w..,...'......'.'.."...'--..- ...,,,- .....:::..;~;...;.,5,.. ',' ~~,,':j
gro'unCiwafcT'froni.t11e'iqUJfci~hifh: provideS-the c61d-~ate:r'baseflow to Brow!" s Creek wiHIe:id i(noii~-term ':~ (.
~ \\ c~~t~t!~ffi~~~~~~~~~:;i;~~~\~~ii6: ~~~~~1~t~;~;; j~~e~djf:ith~:'i;;;;~I"t~;~~t;:'i~~~tr;;~~'i~'thC' ..;(
sulllmer and falling to the freeling point in the winter.
~\"v
~.:i,~~gr~I~:!I~r~~:~~€{e.J{pr:C:d~\i~.I()Pi!ien~~rr~~\110vra~;r~Rii~f~1~;;;'';h~h:SPQ'nibOth~ai9.light ~nd Y;e!:i; .
P~~fOqs;~cr.~m-at#~~;~~~~~Y:J~a .d'~:ri6t;t~d ~p t~';i;~~ie~.1':""~~-l:
..::;:":':~~~~'.~::.i,,,,,.:~:lo...,;,;;.....,:...:,~.~".jo:"_.~J...!... ..*:,.,,__........'..... *.~...'.... '......-, -..... - 4-......~........ .,:.' ........... ....1.. ~, .. . ..-.,.... ;::~- '. - .... ';'.. ~.~ -.. -.. ~"'. "~.. .... ;. ...-.,' '" .;- ":. .: ~ '. ,- .'y
Meaningful evaluation of the potcntial impacts of the development of the: annex:!rioll are3 on the long-term viability
of the Brown's Creek ecosystem is not possible. and thc t'mure evaluation of additionfll inputs to Brown's Cr~k
I.
8~i26/1997 14:45
430:3:310
CITY OF STILLWATER
PAGE 03
~\Cb
*-t
&'}-
Mr. Kluyton Eelde,
Pa~2
Jun", 23. 1997
originating outside of the annexation area will also be compromised. Predicting the ability of a stream to contill\l~ to
support a diver~ blend of cold and cool water species would se~m difficult without solid baseline dab which reflcct
stream conditions throughout a variet)' of seasonal and annual fluctuations in temperature and pre.cipibtion. While
the immediate implemcnMion of a stre~:un monitoring program is welcomed (and finandally supported) by TerV.
the dab collected in 1997 may not be sufficient to document the "pre-development" state of the watershed.
.
Stcellm Quality
"'I , ,_,_.'" _~_,~'_" ,.._.._.., _ .......' ...., _........,. ._' ... ..... ..... ....._'-_:'..,.,......_..~__"._.~........__. ............... ..~
1:h,?A:ttARdoc'ument presents no current water quality datafor B~~wn's Cre~k.'Nutrient. dataforn;butaries to .l
iBTO~;~~k v:,~ g~n~;~~ :b)' ~";~ei for which no d~~~~;~;~;iot~:-Pi~~ide~Wi~h6ut1J;hd;~'~i~''i;~ ~:..
}rii;~~i'~ ~~~J~i~~j~i'~t~'th~;~-~;;;;r~tr~-~~~~dit1~nse~e~i~-~i:~fcir~~';;q~~i~t~;~~~~~y ~;h~r',".~
'Jl~>~'4' J;:,:,;:~~;},;~.~:-~r.'-;.~>',:,,~:,;, .~:': "~'.'~" M~""~ .. ~- -".: ~;, , __~: ..~ ,.;. - _0_ -. '__~~.' "', . :.. .'-.:_~'" .-~'~ .:<' ~:'~,-.. :'.:',~_...:;:,-,-,;'~~-:-:----,,~~- ~ .
T(ups~m)-~jjt1ioiliTesorwii~ther 'input5 from'Long'Lakc 0; McKusI~~,~k~'.a~_c"al~~ady:degiiiding B'ro;,\'fl:'s Creek ,~,
-: (~d'Jiti~~i~:i~ :U;"~'tC;oix 'Riv~rr ffi1et:On~i:lke'Wacer~~~siudif'~~J~riiik~'ri~b;"t1r~t5avii~~~~;i~-one-'-g /
. ,...._... .d'..... ,.;,'.,_:....>:-,;:.J:.:,..;,.. :~::_ ..-.-..-f-..";...~-',-.~t:::.._~',~j~,.~~..~~7j:',..:. :___,..::....~,.; '~.,:,.. _c _'';
'~ii.onE~~teitlPt to poi~t .~ut flaws. in th~ ~UAR.P~~cs~~Whii~~~}tl:it:a-~o~.a.~~~.n.~!~f?~al~ust:Pti..~~~ch: effort.into '!,'
-'-,.~..':".;...:-:'..-_..~-_.....,~...,.. . :...._-.-...~..., .,...... . .........- - . ,...-.":..'..,.;...,>....':':..-:~....._.'..._,." .-.....
ai~i.ihi(should havc'&:enhjCli:ided'iii'*e~AtlAR''p(ocess??' Given Thafpeak'outf)ows'froIn Long Lake will still be )
--:~';_'.:'.~- . ~:..: :":":' .,"<', ..... ';~r<J'~,to!".,.;,,"':~.-r.-./;;,'~""{:'~i.;'-':::;;~"':>'~";;_.::,~'i*..~,:;:..I.:_~::~,._:~:1~';~~?;:,;~:~~1;t:"l:1'r-r,J.;i~.;r.:;:~>>.~:~~';':~"":~,.........~....:..____-.;..:.. ,::. _ " :'-.' -:' ;
directed toward Brown's Creek. TCfU believes that the points raiSe4 PY Mr.'fabio's impromptus'llid"tiequire'. ,_.. j
. ..__.:..,.~;..>'.a.......~..~---:-'~ '.' . . ". ~.. .-..... , .
f~~J1€r~t~dY~"da.:tion. 1
Other b...ues
_....-.--,<.- --''''-'~''~ -:-",' .- " -:---:-"."".~-'
~!:~Lts.~l,s(fCOnCcmed over the apparent la~k of enforcc:nlcn~_o~.c:xi~.tini per~!dT.~Jt~~~?n~!~i~f~.![o~s;..ai\d. :3'~
~-....::..:-,-:..,..,..--:--:",,"-...'-,,:_,,:,_.. --";~"_--"_"::"":.-"""'-" . ...;:'-..-.'~" .,------ . ..' . ~,
ordinanccsi:The AlTAR dOCllment stresses rdiance on existing regulatOI}' framewc.rks and voluntary compliance
"'-'_.F ..;',';'~_,_".,/ I
with proposed standards and methods. The City's continued violation, of its Long L:Jke outlet permit is an ominous
sign of the type of volulltltry c'Jmpliance that might be demolwrated p,ost-devc;lopmcnt. If e.xisting regulations are
not enforced. how can it be reasonably e;xpected that future,dc\-e!opm:nts wiH be policed any IlWrc strictly?
~~~1~ ~.~3~..~omn~~~~ relates to ourexpect3tion that~~~i~~~%!t~;~~~f~~~~ff~~'L.~~~u:a~~'W.it~.c~rtS~t:nts<;~J
";~fthapproptiate-qualificatlo-ns -aild expeneiicc'iridic deSign of ri[bari"-iold.-~-afer'rTpman~;j'stell1~~..sReclian~liri;rr;d '1
,;~,,:,,""':': ...-....'.;.;:.;..~..~.....:j:~'~:..~.~.~.......:."WY'..i.l~':::"~1'tw.r.;f..:.t~~,...;.~__(-.......4~~..!~~~..:...J. 7~ :!:.~::::'~<i\\~:7;:::;~'..-:"'..::;::_": '~~'-.'.J:~~t:.~~....>..:..:, " ~:..;.--- ...; it"~
.~~~~~r~tlOii.of d.esig'naced trout streamsis a complex proCcss that wi.!l r~ii.ir~ niorelhf1ii'lhc'staiii:J;ifi:llOO=year nood ~~'
::.1;" ..;.::';;'~:';';:'~'-~"!'."~~~:;',;..~~- .,..):. -:":-4 ,',,>... ..,.,....".-.., .:'~":-:_. '-'_.' .. :. c,..., -' .. : .0 .:' ~:~.:~"t'~;':~;::<~"'::":,-:..~..,.::1:t,.,:.~! '.:: ':" . . -'. :." :';:'.:~".-;: ,', .... ~ - ~.
( ~~~~.c;~:~7~~~~~?:~~~d.rip.:rapp~d stream~Rnks. Trout ~meam5 are co)m~lex sys'tcmtof in-:5treal;i~arid ri'parian habitat.
J:!,/in constant flux as the Slrc-.arn current passes by. Done properly, the.s~eam restOrati~~ COU~d set an exa~lPle .for othn
Y urban trout stream watershe,js ,\(.:ross the coun.try (l) ernuh\lt, Done Improperly. the Clt). of Snl1water will J(lUl (he
growing lisl of municipalities that sa<:riticc ecological and ae5thelic values and quality of life for an e:(panded tax
b~ise and incre.a.sed revt:n~ end, Olle must ask at what point a~e the e:ttTa cost~ necessary to dc:~"c1op
~SCnSjti"'"C:; properties olllweighcd by the intrinsic value of the unde'ieloped land OT stream resource? Gjven that i1:l
..
.
.
.1
..
.
~(
(j
.
I.
0~/26/1997 14:45
CITY OF STILLWATER
PAGE 04
430:3:318
MI. J(l:1}'tQn Ec~e$
Page)
J\ln,e 23. 1997
3ttempt is being made t..o_sp,rC3.d the cost of developing the annexation area to the rest of the metro areas should rai~
..~~-~~.~~~l.1~'~:j,??;~ft.~;T;~~,"',~~~~~~.~~ :~~,-"",,~,"'''''~~'-'-"'"<~---..---..---.'----'-'.
red flags. ~fJ9tpl'opOSeddevelopmeiitl~~~!!~~2~le :-v.ben ~OSts ~ .~~d. only aIll().ng the ne\fl,ots 'and parcels, ~~:- "';;.
\Vb~r~:%f~fff~i~~~~d' t~~blidi~c;th~~~\'e10p~~ni?7Suth7upsi4i;dii~U;'t~;:~;;~i'i~~'p~ct'of '6~ldii;ri{'r ' :'
,,;:":;:~~~~~;:;;;;~~;~::;"~~:;'~~"~~.~7~r~r;:?~;;:~"r:-','~~~':;: ~:'~"->:"':-~~~'a~~~ .,...~.~.,;jl'~~'<"'::- _ _..:._.~ .;. - _ ~'-- - ~:.- .' ,', -:.. ~.."
~:~,:~,e~!~~~~:~~~~ ~~_ gl_~eJ. !_~e.. f~.se i.~Pr:::!~~!~~~_~~,~~,~:~7~~~~~~S~~. ~~~~~~~I,)?. ~C3.S~~~c.S~
TCTU appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments- While we remain committed to preserving Brown's
Creek, we hope this letter communicates the :serious concern which .....e have regarding lhe City of Stillwater' $
proposed development in yet another of the Twin Cities metro area's trout stre.am watersheds.
~
"
...--"
Sincere])' .
~J Jj uk-A
Stillwater Annexation Area AUAR Technical Committee
Twin Cities Chapter of TrQut Unlimited
PO Box 11465
Sl. Paul, MN 551) 1-0465
v'--
c%'-
J,.._ ._J r. t.J.L~ '..'I
Minnesota Depar!mcrll of Natural Res~)urce~
.')IXJ l:lf:i)l."II:: RV;!II
St. ;>~:JI. :\1,"n~''''.l ....,........:ll_
10
(MN DN~)
June 30, 1997
Klaytoll EcIc1c~, P.E., City Engineer
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Streer
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE; Stmwater Annexation Area
Draft Alternative! Urb~ Area....ide R~view (AUAR)
Dear Mr. Eckles:
..,
The Department of Na"'<>I Reoourees (DNR) has reviewed the DC>/l A UAR for ",e Stillwater
Annexation Area. As you know, DNR has been afforded aD oppO_ity Co provide Input into the
AUAR pr""eos on iS3ues of natu<>1 reSOurce concem, paniculadyas lhey relate to Browns Creek, a
deslgD.ted Crout Stream. We offer the fOllOWing eO",men~ for your eomid....t;on, where we ,,'il]
inWally decali Some genora! observac;cns that are foUowed by. series of commenrs tied sp<eiJic.liy to
the Draft A tJAR itllelf.
We fi"" COmmend the City for Irs recognition <hat future dove/opme,,' in the "'-'<Iy 'rea can adversely
.ffect na"'<>1 resources, resources which we believe add ,ignific.nt benefirs lO lhe quality of life In
Stillwatcr. The City has demomtrated a elea, mnIe"tanding that only through laking protective acdon
now Can these same benefi" be =red for the future. Pie... consider DNR as · long-term _r in
meeting At! AR objecdves 'nd we look forv.~,d to Working cl..,ely wilb lbe City for many years In
come.
This recognition Offered, ensuring the long-term integ,ity of Brown, er..k as . vi.ble Itout ,..hOly will
nOt be ea,y. Imp.et avoidance should be a dominant feature of each future p'oject proposed In lbe
'nnexation .,e.. and where impact avoidance ear.nOt be achieved, the m/'ig.tio", io lbe AUAR
Mitig.tion Plan 'bould be ,trictly applied by aI! ,egulatolS. Often lbe Cuy will have grcacos'
jurisdiction. but situations will ari,e "'here other entities. ei,her at lbe lOCal, Slate, 0' federal revels,
(e.g, Washington County Soil and Wa", Conservation D~tcict, Minnesota Pollutior. Contr\)1 Agency,
and US Army Co<p' of Enginee", resp.ctive!y), will have grea"r regulator, .ulbority Ove, a project's
polemi.! impacts. The City should hold .lIrelev,,", regulalors. including DNR, !O a high P<rmil
'eview standanllha, demons"at.. a clearly pl.ced priority on maintaining, and furthe, "'!Onog,
B,o"",,, Creek as une of the few rem.ining Metro S!rcam, exhibiting. ItOUt tishery.
The ,...Iily that ltlUch of lbe Browns Creek ,on!ributing wa""bed lies beYond lbe City Ihni~ mUS! be
add,,,,,ed when assessing lhe long <enn prospec~ for successfully proteajog this resource in the race of
evenlOaJ devefopmenc The docun.... corroctly noles <hat thc "host" ItOUt ware" DCeu, in the lower
reach of B,ow", Creek (mostly Within lbe City Jimj~). while sections ofthe Uppe, W.ters/led (OU"ide
rhe anne,'t3tion boundaries) are less suited a... trout habitat.
F)\jH 111f<,r",;Jli"~I: h /1 11Jt. :" 5 7. I SIIIl.7('1.'>lKJfI . n Y: Ii I ~ .!'X.. )'/X-J. I ~(l() b"!. 1')2'.'
A't r"'I;1I t>J"..'UII'.... !""I"n:,'.',
\'11". '1'aJ'f\",'Jlvl""'h
ft '-:III:..rJ ,.., ~"")' Ini r,o I"" :.....1;-..,..:;:..
t.;j 1.fU'I'I"",.of ".'~. t'~....t ".M' ...It""" ~'::..,..
..
e( .
.
I
~
.
.
:tIO
:#/0
# JI
.
........,. .......
f(layton Eckles, P.E.. City Engin~r
June 30., 1997
How the Upper watershed is m:lnaged Clclrly impacts the future viability of the Iv\l'tr reach a~ trOUt
habi,ae. Only through o~n and collaboraCl....e long term planp.ing that recl)gniz,:s the legitimate, dh.tr:se
imerests of each stakehold:r, can a toul ~l'Orecti\.e strategy fee Browns Cr~ek bt: d~v:Joped. This lon~
tt::m planning may include t11: application of Ute Al..4.R proces., to other gei,1!:rapbic area.. within th~
Bm_ C..ek wate"hcd. Because bo'h DNP. ar.d rh, CilY of S'illwarer." deepl)" m,.- in the long
tenn he:Jlth of Browns Creek, ~'e h;l\'c a mutual interest in using all availab:e forums. TIIis AUAR is
bur the fU'st step in the serie:s of comrnitrnerns required. \\'.; look forward to broadening st:1keholder
involvement in th~ long term prote...-tion Jf Bmwns Creek and invite your panicipacion.
We believe the Draft AUAR's focus on Browns Creel and its tributaries is well placed. However', w:
are concerned that potential de':elopm:o:-relaTed impnclS in the anneXatIon a..-ea ~11 Contribute to the
c.lt::gradation of the St. CrOt't River. Th!~ s:gnitican: natura] resoun;~ is the Ultimate recipient of most of
the stormwat.:r runoff generated in the a:t.'l::xation areas. Tb~ river i.~ mentioned only I few times in
the document. We note that even witb !~ C1.lrrent devdopment in plac~. there ~:-e sedimentation
problt:mS at the mouth of the Browns Cr:ek wbcu: it enters the Sr. Croix at Wolf'a: Marina. Thi3 U a
developmem induced problem. .
TIle Final AUAR should recognhe chat fu1ure deyelcpmem in the annexation areas could potentially
impact the St. Creix River. For example. there has been no analysis of the effects of i.rt~reased flow
flushing of the pass through lakes, specifically long and i\'JcKusick. Bec3u~ it is possible rha~
McKusick uk: is a phosphorus (nutrient) sink, where fiushmg could have n~gativc impacts on !b~
water quality of the Sr. CrQix, such an anaiJ'sis ~hou1t! be conducted with the results applit:d 10l11c
prQtecti\'e framework b~lng de...elop~.d for che AUAR. We al.c;o believe thae an analysis of me .retention
time for phosphorus removal efficiencies is required under the proposed scemlrios ~o tleuer identiiv .
pote:1tiaI impacts tc the SI. Croix River. The Mitigation PICln should includ~ elemento; specificaU}.:
designed to avoid Or mi~igate Un?actS to tit: St. Cro;,;; River.
The commelUS that follow .l.re effect<! in the order that issues all:: addre.ss~d in the doct;men;: it5eIf.,
Item 10, CoYer Types
PaJ~ /9. Paragraph J. The text u:tdersmes the value and ranking ('If these woodhndo;. The
"S'iUwater Open Spac. Report,. p"p"e<J by '<nsuJranl Ka~'".n MaW,', vel)' e/..,r1y ranks rhe1.cng, (j)
L3ke West marsh and o~ WO(lCs as a "large, modera:e priority :lite," (rank E:C). Both woodland size
and qua lit)' are jmporiali~ considerations for suitOLbiHt}' tl wildlife luhitat.
Pllge 19, Paragraph 2 The paragraph SI.1~es. "jhe mrst s:gnific:IIlt loss of wcocland aDd forest
acreage will iikelj' OC~Ur along the W::'~ sid~ (If Long Uih." This Joss sholJld be av.:,ided becau!e these
oak Woods are signifi""lll'nd valuable ('om, '!ildU(, bbila, persp,c"... This ass""n,,,, appUe.s C9
even with their buckthorn induced dcgr3dati~n; i1:l an aside, buckthorn is actually a good wildlife fcod
~Ource, We have attached an articie detailing the v3.lue of oak woods for wi)dlif~ for you and your
Consultant's use.
Item II, Fish, WUdlife, ond &ologi,aUy S,rurlri.. Rnoou".... ;:-1
General comment. Th, 'pellL,," of "wa<elrhrush" for "iis species is In,,,,,,o<(. Th, cnmCl spelhng i, \JI
.w:lterrhnlsh. ~ This misspdling OCcurs in numerous places in the docum'::nt.
")
I
I
,
~ \ \
~
~
~l
. .... '.._ - ,,'.. ".0_-
...,.A. I ..t...
r'. t...... ...
J.... "_
~
K~a)ton Eckles. P.E., City Engir:eeT
June: 30, 1997
.
PCJg~ 22. Paragraph 2. This ?3Ttig:3ph ends w;:.'l t~ correct recognicioa tlu~ DNR does n';)f a::tivel}'
m3nagt: the upper jXlnion e,f Browns Crec:k found in the :1nne:xation 3.r:a. f'llr!her C,,?Ia."1alion :;hould (!)
be (lffered tb:u the reason the: uppc:r reac~es of Brown.~ Creek are DOt managed as i1 fIShery is that th~re 4
are nv public lands adjacc:nt to th~ cr:ek. By law, the DNR mUSt ha.ve angler easements OT fee tWI; to '
conduct ~p.:cirlc manageme~t pra.:tices or :spend public: money. ONR own.~. :i!her by fee titlo: C'r
easement, prope:ty along t./lt stream from the old stone arch bridge dowmm:arn lO the mouth.
111ercfore. DNR should be c:on,idered a stakeholder as well as :1 partner in limiting impa.:tsJI:: Browns
Creek,
Aiso on this p:lge, the word "risherman" should be cb;mg;;:d :0 "angler." ,0
Page 24. Prorection Srrategy J. (aJuf u;h/!rt'Yi:r ~lJ~ the idea o/moving ;he McKlJsid Lake dik!! is .A;"
discussed) In reviewing this litrategy, we are conce:-n:d that tl:ese wetlands win be .:onvl:rt.:d to op~n '~
water{ong term. thus d~grauil1g their wildlife I\.3.bit3t value.5, especially as develupment occurs
up:;tream outside the 3.IUlcxatiOQ l1re:l.
Pagt' 24. PrOtel.:t1011 SIrat~gy 2. Some of the worst d3.mage to the ravine is cc;urrirtg from the cxis,ing
SlClrmwater drainage .5j'st:m along Haz:! Street. Although net specifkaUy Icc.1ted in the cmnex,3tlon
area: calHng for remediation of these ~;te5 35 pan of this plan t:ould slIbSlamialIy jmp~o...e the City's
abiLity to me::t the overall stated goal of protecting '.he ravine and its narural re~"urce5.
Page 24. Pr(..rection Srrotegies 3 and 4, The strategie~ p:ovided are good. a.nd as su:.:h. should be
. clt:arly and strcng:y e:t:prcssed. \-Ve 3(: concerned that some of the I3ng~ag: is seemingly weak.. i.~..
~ ":nay consi~cr". "may be implemented, to or "m3Y also choose." Commitments to implement should
~ uot ~ ambIguous,
Page 26. ProieCtllm Sm:llegy S. Tl1e nconunendatior. restricts iJ11pJemel\ta~ion of (I. COl1tiI1UOU~,
protective stream habitat corridor to just along Browns Cr~ek for tho~ areas dowmtfeam from the
~ Scone B:idge, Such 3. protective corriGor s~ould he ot;tblished along tb: creek throu~hout the entire
annexal10n area.
Page '27. Lasr Paragraph. 11t: st:lIcm-::nt. "While all of th::, se rare fe.ature tlemellt'i occur ou:;;id:: lh~S
annexntion area...... is confusing. We assume that it refers oniy to one element, the Louisiana lV
watenhrush. If this is correct. we reco:nmend stating: ~While this r.lte f~3rure ell::mem , . .. to
~ II
~
.
Page 28. Proteclion Stretegy J. Ot:~'e!oprr.ellt of a p..:destri3.n paUl may be ir.compatible ...:ith
prolection of t.llls resource. 'Tbe site is ~:~ and relatively fragile and ;ngle=s (10 no~ require :SUe!1 a.
trail. ErosioJl problems in this area are J. resullo( stonr.wa.ter runoff contrihuted hum streets. In
addition, in.:;L,\!lation of a trail cvuld have tllC undesirable impact of reducing the vea's suitability as
habitat for various species of birds sensir';e to hu:masl intrusion. We 1~~:1d ck'sc coordinatioo
with DNR staff jf this par: of the propo.~al is implemcn:eo:L Plea.'ie contact Wayne Barstad. Regional.
Emdrorunental AsSeliSnlent Ecvlott:.sr (REAE), at (612) 772-7940 as dis~ussion~ prceced.
Page 29. Forest Protection Strategies. Elemc.lt 3 re.qui:es 'p!,)ject proposers, through deveiopmcm of
co ......r- 3 Forest Marugemem Plan. to "ider.lif~; Jn3nagcment s::4t:~:cs to pr'Jtect the he:1!r.h and function of c:lk
?'1 I woodlands and mitigate t"or losses tholl .Jccur Gue to development." Althollgh a laudable goal. the onl;.
~
.
.
~
~ 1'2.
.12
y
../1.
~J1.
.....1 -" I '-I l. ., ~I ,....1
I O~\ ............ _ ..v v...I.....
.,)'-'11 ,'O."...' ;JI
1.- '.'
1....;_' v'
Kla)'lon Eckles, P.R.. City En~inecr
June 30, 1997
wa.y to sustain and fully protect the {OI'cst and it's ecological values, such as providing wildlife h3.bicat
or water purification, as well as to "proce~t the (forest's) health and function," is to r,=move it fl'om the
devel<'pment plan and manage me woods 3.<; designated, passive recreation areas with limited walking
tra.il development. This 10:1:1 (of ecological function) can only he mitigated through purchase a t:raCt of
oak woods from another site with cOn1;J::Jrable (or higher) ecological value... and sized oak trees.
II
Page 33. Wildlife. This section ignores the importance of the oak woods (0 .....ildlife. Oaks, and oak (j)
fores~ communities. provide numerous b:nefit;s to wildlife that can be described in short 3.<:; food and b
5helter for both invertebrate and vertebrate species. The many groups tho'\( benefit include mammals.
pa~rine birds. insects, reptiles, and amphibians...
Page 33. Mitigative Measure 3, A p!an, which including restoration actions for lhe ra.vine, is a. good
idea. The oak woods need restoration management also.
Item 12, Physical Impacts on WatE:r Resources
Page 34. Existing Condirio1L<:. The warer quality of Long Lake was evaluated by the ~letropoliGln 0J
Council. It may be useful to compare Long Lake with lakes of similar limnologicaJ make up by usin
the Lake Classification System developed by Dennis SCblIPP, DNR Sect ton of Fisheries, in Brainerd, I
Mr. Barsud can be contacted for [urL,er inform.ation. --
Page 38. Paragraph 3. This paragraph di~cussC$ a proposa.l to convert thl: channels from Long Lake,
ar.d through Jackson WMA, into wetlands to I' enhance" and to provide wetland mitigation. We have
serious concerns regarding this mitigation element ba.sed upon existing DNR policies. DNR policy
expressly prohibits use of lands administered by the DNR's Division of Fish and Wildlife for wetland
mitigation. The policy was established to a.voij wetland mitigation subsidizatioD. In addition, W~
generally recommend that wetland mitigation and restoration be targeted at drained or otherwise '
degraded wetlands, rather than creating new wetlands or expanding existing wetlands. The propC'sed
alteration also generates concern because it is not in the best interest of wildlife to convert
upland/riparian wildlife habitat to an artificial habitat type. Regardlng the proposed activity, it is
unlil<e1y that DNR would offer its approval based upon these pointS.
Figure 12-5. The addition of the following inforinacion co the figure would make it more
understandable; specifically: directior. of flow; north arrow: quantity of water going through the
opening; and size of the pipe under the railroad tracks.
@
Page 46. Paragraph 2. In discu.c;sing the runoff diversion proposal, the tex.t notes dun the system's
ability to divert an entire 3-inch rainfall event rests on provision of "a few regiorull ponds west of
Manning Avenue." Although the text further notes that only a 2.S-inch rainfall event will be hand~ed
"without the (regional) ponding," we are concerned that the discussion doe... not sufficiently portray e I 0
consequences of not installing these regional ponds. The regional ponds are OUGide the anne.'(ed
and the City of Stillwater, thus their future insta.llation is uncertain, Therefore I the discussio:1 offere
provides a false sense of what the stru:cu!'e is capable of handling under cummt conditions becaus~ of
the focus on the "poI1ded~ scenario,
Same paragraph, This sentence, "During :storm ever.ts, the temperarun: of the base flow would ~ (;"";')
::ti Il- diluted with warmer Stormwater runoff, but at a much smaller rate and volume than currently ex.ists," V
Ie
4
. ......... . - .. - .. -'_ _....._ I
Klnyton Eckles, P.E.. City f.ngineet
J\mC 30. J 997
requires clarifiC4tlon. Under a dc:veloped condition. one would expect to S~ the T3te and volu~ of
runoff co increase. Is this sentence in fact referring to the runoff entering Bro\\"nS Creek?
.
Same paragraph. The discus:;ion of the sluice gate and its opc:ration is contradictMY, If in the future @
4- 12- it is decided that passing the b3..~e flow b insignificant, the sluice gate could be clo:;c:d and flow from I 7-
the upstream grQundwater fed springs could enter Browns Creek and contribute to it... hase flow.
~\~
Page 48. Browns Creek Divasion. Our primary concern with this strategy is that sufficient space is
not availa.ble far the construction of a fully functional stream channel. The resultins stream segment
will not be able to shape itself in a natural fashiQn and heavy armoring will be necessary to prevent
bank. and bottom erosion. DNR specialists have e;xam\l1ed the site and have developed an alternative
approach designed to achieve a broader set of managexm:nt objectives than is pos:sibh:: with the
prap,os~d design offered in the Draft AUAR. (See the attached memo for a more detailed description
of the methodology and the recommendation.) Essentially, we recommend de:ligning an "E.5- stream
::hannel in the northern portion of the mar.!h to re-route Browns Creek. All "E" stream type exhibits
(high sinuosity. gentle to moderately steep chaonel gradients, and very low width/'Jcrth radoll. The E5
stream types are hydraulically efficient and maintain a high sWiment transport capacity.
This strategy makes the most sense from a river morphology and stream rcsouro:es perspective, but it
also offers elements of practical benefIt to the City. Tradeoff:; from a maximal storage scenario are
immediately apparent, however these costs should be offset 10(1g tenn by reduced costs fOI ~tream
~hannel maintenance: within and downstream of the channel connection, and creation/maintenance d
bro'W'Tt trout habitat. Under this alternatiw. dikes could be de,igned such that storage within an
expanded McKusick Lake was maximized under very heavy precipilation events, and lhe new stream
channel could be inundated during these rare events. Temporary inundation can be tolerated if a stable
nat".Jral channel design was accomplished and connectivity of the upper and lower portions of Browns
Creek were enhanced/maintained. DNR is willing to commit staff expertist: from our Stream Habitat
Program to see that this is accomplished. Stafffrom our Divisions of Waters and Fish and Wildlife
would be available too. /'
GY
.
Page 53, Secor.d to last paragraph. The discussion completely lacks any e~plarultion or description of
proposed IXmding locations in relation to BrowDs Creek. The only memion of landlocked basins occurs
in reference to warm W<1ter discharge ~nvirorunental concerns.. We believe ponding within the Browns
* \ t Creek watershed needs to be further addressed, especially as it pertains to the J:'roposed diversion. TIle
stru::ture being proposed win allow a base flow to go through to Browns Creek. Ba~d upon the . AA\
discussion. it appears that this strUcture is in place only to create opportunities for ponding within the \t.Y
(annexed area with [ittl~ (or n.;)) consideration fOT thermal impacts on the b3..'\e flow. More detail is
need~ regarding locations, pond ty~sJ and the anticipated discharge amounlS.
In addition, this paragraph requires clarification. The last two ~entences appear to contradict each
other. One recommends that landlocked li1~ be discharg.:d directly into Browns Creek, while the
ou-.er states envirooment:l.l concem ft'r Brown!; Cr~ek as a r:sult of these discharges. What is being
said here'?
5
.
.
::tL/t}
~ 19
~
.
.
KJa}1011 Eddc$, P.E., City Engineer
Jum: 30, 1997
Page 54, Discussion ofWerlarzd Impaas Re/at~d 10 the McKusick Lake Dl,,'ersion. Tbis discuSSion@s
1l-IZ ~hould include a table showing the:: amount of each wetland type that would be affected by th.e
diversion. ' .
Item 14, Water-Related Land Mans2anent Districts
Th<: Draft AUAR correctly notes th<11 parts of the 3I1Ilexation area an: ~iubject to shoreland management
considerations. Because the annexed land contains basins th2t )1ad shoreland standards in the ~
Township. the City's adopted ordinance should meet current sute guidelines. Our records do not &
indicate: if the City completed the adoption process begun in 1m 1993. DNR wilt he contacting your
office to a3sure tl}at the ordinance is In place.
Item 19, Water Quality - Wastewaters
The discussion in this section should identify the potential for construction dev.'atering durinS sewer
insulJ3t~on to locally impact water levels of surface water fe3.rurcs, especially Browns Creek. DNR
will likely limit the extent of construction dewatering allowed. and will likely requiN monitoring wells@1
and protected flow monitoring. Construction techniques will be scrutinized to assure that permanent
dewatering of the creek does not occur by inter::eption of groundwater flow. In addition, the coloe
assigmnent in Figure 19-1 is difficult to discern, particularly for" Alternate Plan B" versus "Existing
Pipes. ...
Appendix B - the Miti2ation Pla.n
Page]2, Goal 4, strategy J. As previou.'ily noted, a designated trail in the ravine would be
illco:npatible with resource protection.
Page 14. Goal 5, Whik we will always support the use oi native vegetation, planting trees in yards
wiU not replace lost oak woo<ls community, A forest is more than the trees.
Closing Remarks
We understand thaI the City and their consultants are nOw prepari.,g a supplemental feasibility study on
the recon:mendat!ons off~n:d in the AUAR, The Fixul AUAR and Mitigation Plan should identify the
relation:dIip and role this study has to the A l'AR proce=s.'i.
As provided in Minn. Rules part 4410.3610. subp, 5B. we request to be:: notified by the City of
Stillwater, operating as the Responsible Gove::rnmental Unit (RGU) for the Stillwater Arul~^afion Area
AUAR. upon receipt of application.. for specific deve1opml:nl projects withiog the (study) area. We
recoULl1end that this notice be offered as soon as possible, before adoption of preliminary plans or
plats, to t:nsure effective early cvordinalion on a given proposal. Also, given that development within
the study areas may talce years to accomplish. pl~e direct these notices to the attention of the DNR
Metro Regional Administrator at our oftices located at 1200 Warner Road. St. Paul. MN 55106.
Although we have provided an extensive set of comments, they should not be construed as diminishing
the value of the work that has been accompli~hed in developing this environmental report. This Draft
AUAR is well developed. The points we have offered are intended to clarify and enhance th: final
utility of the protective protocol descri~c within the AUAR document. We consider the City of
Stillwater to be a long-term partner, the first. of many. in institutin~ the impact avoidance and
6
-.... . _. -. ..-
I ......, ..... ~.. ,L ':""",, '.I'\..J'6-'
JUri .:::U ':J( J.J',,":J
r. \)~ II...'r
Kl.o1yton Eckles. P.!::., City Cnginc~
June 30. 1997
.
regul.1.tory framework necessary to prot~ the natural resources of value fOl.lnd within the annexation
area. We encourage continuation of conta=:ts established by this process as we both stdve to meet
mutual goals of interest.
Thank you for the opporwni:y to review this project. We look forward to receiving the Fioal AUAR
and Mitigation Plan in the ~r futurt. Please contact Billlohnson of my staff at (612) 296-9229 if you
have questions regarding this It:ttcr.
Sincerely.
r-p;:f --rr~ tr-~
Thonus W. Balcom, Supervisor <
NaroraJ Resources Environmental Review Section
Office of Pbnning
'atUlchmems
c:
Kathleen Wallace
Con Christianson
Pete Otterson
Wayne Barstad. REAE
Dale Homuth, Regional Hydrologist
Molly Shodeeu, Area Hydrologist
Dave Zappetillo. Fisheries
Bob Welsh. Wildlife
Joan GaJli, Wildlife
Hannah Duncvitz, Eco~Servic~
Annette Drewes. Metro Trout Waters Coordinator
Ian Chisolm, Eco-Services
Sh:1rron Nelson, Natural Heritage Program
Lynn M. Lewis, tiSFWS
Gregg Downing, EQB
Gary Huber, Trout Unlimi1ed
.
#9701) 1-03
DAUARI.WP6
7
.
.
.
I.
~
The Oak R.e$oum: in the Umlel' Mict.o.s
SIGNIFICANCE OF OAKS AND OAK FOREST COMMUNmES
FOR NONGAME WILDLIFE
Lee A Pfannmuller1
ABSTRACf. The important value of oaks as a source of food and cover for nongame
wildlife is reviewed. The equally important benefit that nongame species provide to oaks
is also discussed. Vertebrate inventories of oak forest communities in the Upper Midwest,
however, are limited. Data from a few sources are used to identify some common species.
'.
INIRODUcnON
Oaks and oak forest communities provide numerous benefits to wildlife. From the acorn
in the forest canopy to the dead log on the forest floor, each stage of the oak's life cycle
provides food and shelter to a host of vertebrate and invertebrate species. The geographic
distribution of several-animals, such as the raccoon and California woodpecker, actually
coincides with that of one or more members of the genus Quercus (Van Dersal 1940).
Nesting colonies of passenger pigeons, which often contained millions of breeding birds,
moved regularly in response to the location of abundant mast crops, leaving a trail of
devastation in their wake. In Minnesota and Wisconsin, acorns were the major food item
for this now extinct species (Blocksteinand Tordoff 1985).
Certainly the value of oaks to such traditional game species as wood ducks, turkeys, bl?-ck
bears and deer is widely recognized. The food and cover they provide for a variety of
nongame species, including small mammals, woodpeckers and passerine birds, is also well-
documented and is reviewed below. The relationship between oaks and nongame wildlife
species, however, is not strictly commensal. Several studies have demonstrated. the
significant role of seed consumers to oak forest migration and succession. The special role
that blue jays play in this regard is discussed.
The paper concludes with a brief summary of our knowledge of nongame wildlife specie~
typically associated with oak communities in the Upper Midwest. Vertebrate inventories
of oak brushlands and forests in this region are limited. Data from published sources and
from inventory efforts associated with the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) are
used to identify some of tbe forest's common species.
INonpmc R.esearch Supervisor, ~n.cC$OU DeputmeDI 0( Nalllral R..csources., Box 7, DNR Buildill&, 500 Wayctte R,o.d,
St. PauJ, MN SSlS5. The author p-alcCully K~ed~ lhe help aDd enlia! l"C'Yicw pt'O'Iided by Gcrc1a NordquiQ., StC'o'C 5nKUr a!ld
Gary Seim.
Prcsc.Dtcd at 'The Oak Resource in !be Upper M.i~ Conlere~ W'UlOna. MN. J.UDC 3-6, 1991.
"
. .....
~ ,
. r
The Oak RCSOQl"C'e in rile t.:ooer ~ictv.est
hollow butts or broken tree tops, as a temporary shelter for escape and loafing. dens (or..
winter shelter and raising young have more exacting requirements (Sanderson 1975). Mast
3.bundance, howev~r, is considered to be a more limiting factor for squirrel populations than
the availability of suitable den trees.
~
The requirements of cavity nesting bird species in oak forests have also received
considerable attention. In the Upper Midwest, oaks provide habitat for eight primary cavity
excavators and for approximately 2S birds, mammals and herps that are secondary cavity
users (number adapted from Missouri Department of Conservation 1985). In Missouri.
cavity nesting birds were 22% of the 139 species utilizing oak-hickory forests during the
breeding season (Hardin and Evans 1977).
Numerous studies have addressed the habitat needs of cavity-nesting species. Most work has
focused strictly on breeding season requirements. In central Pennsylvania. eight of nine bird
species wintering in a mature oak stand were trunk foragerS, including the black-capped
chickadee, downy woodpecker and white-breasted nuthatch (Yahner 1986). Brawn et al.
(1982) pointed out that the availability of winter food may actually regulate breeding
populations of these cavity nesting birds. In a study these authors conducted in central
Missouri, snags were an important Source of winter food for several cavity nesting birds
utilizing oak forests. The rough-barked white oak was one of three species used most often.
Snags used for breeding were typically more decayed and of a wider species variety than
those used for winter foraging. Management guidelines for cavity nesting birds, therefore,
must account for different seasonal requirements. Recommendations to retain a certain ..
density and size of snag trees per acre may not be adequate (Brawn et al. 1982).
Finally, woody material on the forest floor also provides significant cover for numerous
wildlife species. Many small mammals, reptiles and amphibians associated with oak forests
and brushlands depend on brush piles, decaying lOgs, and stumps for essential habitat.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF WILDLIFE TO OAKS
With such a large and heavy seed, oaks are dependent on acorn consuming wildlife as
effective dispersal agents. Although a variety of animals aS5ume this role, including mice,
voles, and blue jays, squirrels are often considered most important. In laddition to their
overall abundance and wide distribution, squirrels are known to consume acorns every
month of the year. But their relatively small home range, and the influence of major
landscape features (such as large roads and water courses) on their movements, may limit
their dispersal capabilities (Johnson and Adkisson 1985). Focus now is being placed on the
important role of the much wider-ranging blue jay.
In a classic study of the symbiotic relationship between the European jay (Garrulus
glandarius) and o~ Bossema (1979) described numerous behavioral traits of the jay that
facilitate oak dispersal and germination. Important components of its hoarding strategy
include: 1) a preference for sound, viable acorns; 2) "planting" each individual acorn
.:
I
..
..'
.'
, .
. .
.
.
'.
l,
"
The Cd: ResouR'e ift the t:ooct' Midwest
u
of their distribution along a COntinuum of dry to mesic oak woodlands. In Minnesota, one
long-term data set is available from an upland oak forest in Isanti County (Breckenridge
1955). Current MCBS efforts in oak communities of the Anoka Sand Plain and
Southeastern Minnesota are beginning to provide additional data. Data from these SOurces
and Probst (1979) have been combined to prepare a list of common and characteristic
songbirds in Table 2.
Table 2. Common and Characteristic Birds of Oak Forest and Brushland Communities in
the Upper Midwest (adapted from Probst 1979, Breckenridge 1955, Bond 1957 and
MCBS 1990).
.Qak Forest~
Bowny Woodpecker
Hairy Woodpecker
NOrthern Flicker
Eastern Wood Pewee-
Least Flycatcher
Great crested Flycatcher
'Blue Jay.
Black-capped Chickadee-
White-breasted Nuthatch-
Gray Catbird-
Yellow-throated Vireo
Red-eyed Vireo
American Redstart
Ovenbird
Scarlet Tanager-
Northern Cardinal-
Rose-breasted Grosbeak-
Indigo Bunting-
Brown-headed Cowbird-
Northern Oriole-
Qak Brushlands
Eastern Bluebird
Cltipping Sparrow
Eastern Kingbird
- Also characteristic of the more open and xeric oak brushlands ,
MAMMAlS
With the exception of the large body of literature that addresses oak forest m.a.nagement for
deer and squirrels, little information is available on other mammalian species. Kalin (1976)
provides some habitat associated species lists for Minnesota's small mammals, including
those associated with oak habitats. MCBS efforts have documented six species that are
ubiquitous across all oak forest type~: eastern cottoncail rabbit, eastern chipmunk, gray
squirrel, white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), racCOon and white-tailed deer. In the
drier, more open oak brushlands the plains pocket gopher and the prairie deer mouse
(Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) are important species. Short-tailed shrews, flying squirrels
and gray fox are also characteristic inhabitants.
REPTILEs AND AMPHIBIANS
Even less is known about the herpetofauna of oak Woodlands and brushlands. . Despite its
overall significance, the relatively depauperate fauna of the Upper Midwest, combined with
the secretive habits of most species, has resulted in a surprising lack of data. Descriptions
'.
i
.
62 The Oat Raoum! i" Ilk l!D'Oef ~~
of general babital requirements from YOgi (1981) and Breckenridge (1944) combined with.
mvemory data. from MCBS provide a sketcb of tbe common species.
Because of their dependence on temporary wetlands, amphibian diversity is generally higher
in mesic oak woodlands. Typical species include: American toads, chorus frogs, spring
peepers, tree frogs (Hyla cbrysoscelis and H. versicolor) and tiger salamanders. Wood frogs
are also characteristic of more mature stands. The eastern garter snake is the most
ubiquitous reptile in the oak communities. Altbough it is rare in Minnesota, the black rat
snake is a characteristic species of mesic oak stands in states further south. An arboreal
species, the rat snake utilizes mature oaks as denning sites. Characteristic species of the
drier brushlands include: prairie skinks, bognose snakes (both eastern and western), blue
racers, fox snakes and bullsnakes.
~
CONCLUSIONS
Oaks and oak forest communities provide benefits to a host of nongame species. In
recognition of their overall value to wildlife, resource managers recommend that oak cover
types be perpetuated and expanded. Management guidelines must place particular emphasis
on the needs of acorn consumers and cavity nesters.
UTERA1URE CITED
Blockstein, D. E. and H. B. Tordoft'. 1985. Gone forever: a contemporary look at the .
extinction of the Passenger Pigeon. Am. Birds 39(5); 845-85l.
Bond, R R 1957. Ecological distnoution of breeding birds in the upland forests of
southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27(4): 351-384.
Bo~ma, I. 1979. Jays and oaks; an eco-ethological study of a symbiosis. Behaviour 70:1-
117.
Brawn, J. D. , W. H. Elder, and KE. Evans. 1982. Winter foraging by cavity nesting birds
in an oak-hickory forest. Wildl. Sac. Bull. 10(3): 271-275.
Breckenridge, W. J. 1944. Reptiles and amph10ians of Minnesota. University of Minnesota
. Press.. 202 p.
Breckenridge, W. J. 1955. Comparison of the breeding-bird populations of two neighboring
but distinct forest habitats. Aud. Field Notes 9: 408-412.
Darley-Hill, S. and W. C. Johnson. 1981. Acorn dispersal by the blue jay (Cyanocitta
cristata). Oecologia (Berl.) 50: 231-232.
.
0,
f
,.
I
.
.
.
6"
The O.1t Resouf'C'e in lhe t.'~ ~~
Shaw, S. P. 1971. Wildlife and oak managem7nt USDA Forest Service, NOnheast Forest
. Exp. Station.. Oak Symposium Proceedings. pp. 84-89.
Short, H. L 1976. Composition and squirrel use of acorns of black and white oak groups.
J. WildL Mgmt 40(3):479-483. .
Smith K.G. 1986. Winter population dynamics of blue jays, red-headed woodpeckers, and
northern mockingbirds in the Ozarks. Am. Midl. Nat 115(1):52:'62.
Smi~ K. G. and T. Scarlett. 1987. Mast production and winter populations of red-headed
woodpeckers and blue jays. J. Wildl. Mgmt 51(2):459-467.
Van Dersal, W. 1940. Utilization of oaks by birds and m~mm~ls. J. Wildl. Mgmt.4(4):404-
428.
VOg!, R.C. 1981. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. The Milwaukee
Public Museum. 205 p.
Wetmore, A 1919. Notes on the structure of the palate in the Icteridae.. Auk 36:190-197.
Yahner, R H. 1986. Structure, seasonal dynamics, and habitat relationships of avian
communities in small even-aged forest stands. Wilson Bull. 98(1):61-82.
'.
t;5~f I,:C~S
.7l1E...'. '-" -1.-..".,
I It _,! _ I. ...::. '-!.
cJ1-<-
'. ~ '. ::.. ~~.".."~..~.-., . ~ , ~.: ....\.,... "J' ~:: 'I'~ II- ~ '7 -, -
"" _ . '" . .." -;' . l,Jo ...; It.: ..' ..' * \,,' .
::/2
.~Metropolitan Council
~ Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
I~
~eb
~\"V
*0
~ \\>
July 2: 1997
(}A.ot-cO'"->o L' ~~ C rj--
'\ (-
. Environmenta.l s~rvices.
Mr. Klayton Eckles. P.E.
Stillwater City Engineer
216 North Fourth. Street
StiII\l.;atcr, Minnesota 55082
RE: Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (
Stillwater Annexation Area
Metropolitan CoWlcil Referral File No. 16518-)
Dear Mr, Eckles:
...
The Metropolitan Council (Council) sbffhas completed its revIew of the draft AUAR for the-
1837-acre Stillwater Annexation from Stillwater Township to determine it') adequacy and how
well it addresses regional plans and policies. We appreciate the opportUnity provided by the city ,
for Council suff to participate in draft AUAR disclL')sions as a member of the Technical Advisory
Committee to th-= city and their consultants. The following comments are offered for
incorporation in th~ final AUAR document.
Item 8 - Permits and ApprovaLr
The final document needs to be revised to indicate simitary.sewer service connection plans for the
proposed development area will need to be submitted to the MetropoHtan C.ouncil Environmental
Service Municipal Servico:s staff for re'lo'iew, comment, and issuance of a construction pemrit
before c0I1I1ection can be made to either thernunicipal Or metropolitan wastewater disposal
system.
.
Item J 2 - Physical ImpactS on Water Resources
Council staff agrees that rerouting ofBro\'r'IlS Creek 110w a\l!ay from McKusick Lake is a very
import:mt component of the proposed plan. While not a matter of regional polic)', we
recommend the tinal docum.ent propose a redesign of the new channel segment tq,.render it more
natural in appearance and function, eliminating the us~ of qox culverts.
Item 13 - Watr,!r Use t
The draft document indicates Stillwater will need ao additional well and new water tower to serve
planned development The tentative location for new well and tower facilities appears to be
located within the area identified on Figure 13-2 as "unsuitable n, based upon the potential for
undesired groundwater interference to Browns Creek. Council staff recommends the city revise
the final document to indicate new well(s) will bc sited outside of the area designated as
unsuitable.
Item 16 - Soil~
The final document needs to include a Jeg~nd on Figure 16: 1 to identify the meaning of sign.; and
colored area.5 located on the figure.
[tern. J2 - TransportafiOIl
rv rvThe draft document describes CSAH 12. and rn 5/CSAH 5 as collector rOnds. These roads are
~ "A" minor arterials. Figurl: 22-1 and the text should be c.;urrected to reflect the correct functional
classifIcation.
.
230 Ea~t V,(th S(r~~l
~l 1':1111. ~lInl1~$/)(;1 55101.1133:3
(1;12) 222 fH2:{
FX'; 229 21 H:~
mo/m' 228-37"0
,1.\ J:;';,It~'" OL.;.n....~LU'1u.=' r::~.p'~.':I....r
.
.
:.
:'R~:\{ J,:C~'S
':/E-,"'-'" -,-;' ,~; 'r'-:::""~ '~, ::;........\-,.... ':t~,.:.}:I(l:.7-1 .
.1' _01... I. __ _ ...1.........: ~.I ."'. ",-:.. V. V....'-....... ..'" _
;"'Q
Klayton Eckles, P.E., City Engineer
Jul>' 2, 1997
Page 2
'When the Stillwater Comprehensive plan \lIas reviewed by the Council in 1996, a main focus of
the transportation review was the potential transportltion impacts of the annexation area. The
Council found that with planned improvements and access control along: CR 15 and development
of the CRI5/m 36 frontage road and access plan, lr.l.ffie from the annexation area should not
have a metropolitan highway impact. The mitigation plan found in the drat[ AUAR states that
JI). "I;t- "new access intersections to CR 15 should be avoided wherever possible and private property
access to CR 15 and TIt 96 should be avoided whe:reyer possible." This falls short of the
commitment to provide access consistent v.rith the access spacmg guidelines <ldopted by
Washington County and the city.
,
The need for the frontage road to serve the business development betv.,"een CR 15 and CSAH 5,
l1.t'Vnorth ofrn 36 is not examined in the draft AUAR. Is this still a planned component of the local
~ transportation systl..~ and should it be included in the mitigation plan? '
Finall)', the mitigation plan states the City should support the provision of an interchange of TH
36 and CR 15. The TH 36 Access plan, prepared by MnDOT, recommends partial access
"v"v interchanges at CR 15 and TH 5. The city should work 'Hith MnDOT to determine the most
~ current plans for TH 36 interchanges and the extension of CR 15 south ofTH 36 to COtU1ect to
TH5.
No formal. action wilt be taken on this AUAR by the Council Council staff recommends that the
city evaluate the comments contained herein during preparation of the final AUAR document. If
you have any questions or need further infonnation with respect to these matters, please contact
either James Larsen, P.E., in the Council Environment Division's Department of Environmental
Planning an.d Evaluation at 602-1 159, or Ann Braden, in the Council Transportation Division at
602-1705.
Sincerely,
Helen Boyer
Director, Environmental Services Division
HJ3:jl
CC: Charles Amason, Metropolitan Counc.i) District 12
Keith Buttleman, Director. Environmental Plaming and E.....aluation Department
Guy Peterson, Metropolitan Council Sector Representative
6-1<-
,
RICHARD L. HUELSMANN
12610 62ND STREET NORm
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
.
July 2, 1997
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota
Re: Stillwater Annexation Area Alternative
... Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
Ladies and Gentleman:
I have reviewed the subject May, 1997 Report and have summarized my comments and
concerns regarding significant relevant matters herein. For ease of review, I have indicated the
applicable Report page numbers.
Water Level of Long Lake
A significant portion of the Report deals with the water level of Lo;ng Lake.
Page
24
31
Appendix B-4
Appendix B-16
A suggested strategy is to "reconfigure the outlet at the north end of
Long Lake to maintain the Lake at a normal elevation of 889'-890', and
direct flows north through the existing drainageway...reconfigure this
drainage ditch to a stream channel form....."
.
30
It is important to note that Long Lake is classified as a "winter kill" lake
"due to [its] shallow depth and limited flow"
38
40
Two scenarios for Long Lake - option #1 "maintains" the NWL at 889'
and option #2 at 890'. The "structural" NWL is stated as 889', while the
current "operational" level is stated as "approximately 890'." The
report states that "option #2,..benefits the Lake residents as they are
familiar with the lake level at this point ...."
40
41
~\1-
f!E~Reporrshotild be, expanc.lea "to-riiore-fullf3nll, T;;Qrg~EpQ'dfiCally'descnoe the-benefits- of .'J
* \ trliH6n'1i2~~d~st Jo_ th.e.:~_~~.l~y~19fattentian~g1v~tooption #1<i~~~~?fR~~~~!.~c:'~,~.~.':)~
.
2
.
. &:Sh~iild rovide iecoiiUnE?nd.~~~iti.for' ~~~p-tionth~fprc;vid~~~~~e)esFoyer~llifUfigation"
( ~g~.t.E?gy,e,~clusive 0 any cos consl erations.; e most efIectIve and beneficial strategy should
~ implemented, regardless of cost, since, hopefully, it would be a one-time project.
It should be noted that for most of the 1990s, the lake level has been in the 891' to 892' range--
and I am not aware that any lake shore residence has been subject to flooding at anytime,
including the rainy year of 1993. With the opening of the culverts in 1996, the lake level
dropped to about 889' 10" -- which is'the level it has been until the rains of June 26-28, 1997
(after which the lake rose about five inches to approximately 890' 3" on June 30, 1997). At 889'
10", th<: lake is at the lowest levelm years -- and results in a less attractive shoreline and less
opportunity for flowage through and out of the lake.
Even after the very significant three to four inches of rain in a very short period of time on
Tuesday, July 1, 1997, the level of the lake on Wednesday, July 2, at noon, did not exceed the
top of the culverts on the north end -- which I understand are at an elevation of 891' 7" at the
culvert tops.
'7Ai1.yproposal toreduc'e the level to,889'..htrther alt~r~'j:he-~l:l.~~liii~~and'make';ithe lake'fari~~s'
~~~~~;~~~~;~~2k!iY'ex~t~rbate~'prObi~~;?rili~~'~'Sh~li?~~d~p~"ana'illiUte(rfiowri:~'}.
'Base(r.Q]:r.~e~Report'sjruonriation descnbe-a a-ri'page 41 and in Tables 12-2a and12':2b:"optio~.
Wr~c)Uld.--;;~m-to"create'p~o1?iems"oh'LakErMcKus{d< ~a 'thiffopticiri ~#2is"c<3'nsiderably n;,or~ ~.
'"~~~i.~~~p~~tW~b~!~t~tfdi~~~~Ji!Chr~?Eii~~~'1d~!f~~;'ti
~ \ '2..
"tv
~~':-:_''''':"~-''''''--'~'-'-''.- ........... '..
:Protection strategy 2;):states "Evaluate methods for improving water
.._. .... - I,;"
quality in Long Lake, including outlet improvements, removal of,
sediments collected at the south end of the Long Lake "'i'"
I"
As stated, these are too general - cOhsiderably more specific detail ,
should be provided for these strategies.
Storm Water Management/Flowage Into Long Lake
The potential for increasing the water level of Long Lake is caused, in my opinion, by the run
off from (a) Stillwater's Market Place area and (b) from land south of Highway 36 that flows
through the culvert under 62nd Street Nortl1, on the western portion of my property.
\rv
*
Page
52
.
Map following 46
~""';:~"-. "'-''':'':'"':-: "'-..:7'~';' -':--7""1- .-: ....,..~;'!"~~---~-.,K....~.,.......~___..,... _ __.....___...,.___......~.."... """:"...._':"~. ..
oTIp'a-g"e 52 'the report should be' ieVisedtoc1;;';h7 whe'ther:the,)"
.<il<"T"'::: ;.j;..-:..,.~ t... - r~~."-!:" ~.w. - "-,",' . ~_. ............~.... .f~"'...~~(:.act.i~fli~~:'I....~-i':~~{.Le~r:~tt!(;.;:~a~:f " _;. ..
,-.~:q~;1~~B.'!~~s?!,r~~~J~:bJ_q?.,~!b~)'~n~V~9tW~~~!.~~,~~.~!;~~~,~9~:~.
~~,Highway 5 and o2il.d Street) refers to the present SItuation ortoa' '. t
. ......:..., .....~...: " _,'. .,:""~,.t.,t::...,':(;,~\......,, ---,_......- ...--......... --. ~...._-,._. ........ .'.-_..:.-____......._____........... .._.._.....::~_'._.......~:_ ....,..~. '. ..'
tptopo,~d. ~arige.., .' .:)
-~..:i.2'...~~:..;-..:..::.:~_......-.~. . -"..-.
3
'.
.
- ,.- -...... ,...,.....,..-..,.....,..,.~;""":!'r--~--~-,..~~:.~~...:-~~.....~~". ........
There"'ort mcikes'rio'comments orref'ommendatiorui".re"'ardin' "th~
Iiowa~~'ttom'Ponap:Cf67 (s~~"~Th~dStr;;i): ~~~~~.~~~t'~~;"}
"""",,~.\o.~....,, , ' .,.' .,' '.',..' :.' " u_ ._.__w . . ,__., .,.' ,<,~'., ...' p.- ," ,. .~.,.., '
~runpIf yOltimefrom commercial d~yelop~~tis.~~ITJarge~.~" and ~';
";"t<')t,,\~r\'.,~~..,...,.;..;;~ ........ .... .~~;l"-~~:.!~""'~~:':~~'-;:i:..l.~.:!f':.Io:-W--,~1i.",fl,~;-:r- .7...... ,'." >' _ _' ~-~'" ..~..~~.~...,~___..-"'~
",.;jtDe,CiW':ofStillwatet-(ioesi;1othave the authority to address these)
'f.",.~"~f'':';',?;,.i.t'''~... . ',' -...., /
PL?":PJ.~~.~;: "."hl-'-'~--~'- .,..., "
fv r1fr~;ihrf~~!~-;~ ~~~~!i?g"~~ps,tiEj~l1.lI~!i6m Pond~ E:~19~~and ,P;Ljoi:th~~(d"f~if~iri."t~',~~ng ,:'
~ \. I ':,~Y~ ~~.:J~~~I:~~~~rces of fl~~age,:!h~}eport, should ~;.~?'P~decl to~t,.~.~~~~.~e .
! ~;,~l?~W~~)~~ePJffi~!l<!.a!i.2,.n~.~~g,a:;~~~~~~I',~;.~:J'.~o~l~~~e~~!}I s3~g th~t~.~~,l~>, y~.
. . ; J~o,~~~~!h~t~.~,eE~e:upstrean:t s.ystem b~ r~v;e~~J~7~~te..or. reduce ~oc~ _, .:
~o~o.~g'~~".,.~_~~~gent. , )'
~ e need for very significant "upstream" remediation was very amply demonstrated on
July 1-2, 1997 following the July 1, 1997 storm as huge amounts of very muddy water entered
. Long Lake from the Market Place and P-L106 ponds and the P-L107 pond. Not only was the
volume very significant, but the water was extremely muddy. . . "
,tv
1/
Sanitary Sewer System
The Report, on pages 76-77 briefly describes two alternatives -- Plan A and Plan B. Figure 19-1
(a map following page 77) shows some lines.
~
!3~Ql..~~:=<!~:mPt!9P'~:,qijp,~g~$Z~-7? ~d the map line~ are unclear and conf9:~g~"Irilaa;fue':,"
. ma'has ifif\hEdlowa>~eih~ided i6Watd -62nCl Streef~/nllrdescn -ti6ftsneealoim" milF'e.f"'reclSe- ~;
~......J";;t"",<"":,;".~..,,.... .....,..: g ...'. ,......,_...,.:."~;,~"':...:i.,..:..;tr,""':..,.,:..~:::,,....,:1''il!-..,";",.....~:;.;,;...~~.,....;;:'~, ", ',,' ,.p . . ,~
Cl!ld~pec.mc; ~e .m~p needs to be, impr.ov~d (~orrt~cted, if n=~0t~~:.~a more'distinguishing' ,"
colors should be used for the varIOUS lines. -'
* I ~.::~+~dp;;5:~ijh~IP@-i~-id;,;,ti€the-aavaiitages '5'a~:~~~:a!;~of}><ith~l~ A .nd !
Lake Surface Use Policies
.
The Report, on page 31, states "Potential impacts from the annexation to these lakes [includes
Long Lake] is primary from storm water runoff...the affects of water craft lli far less than those
of wind, urban runoff, and seasonal change." Furthermore, on page 65, the Report states
"...motorized boating...would be unlikely to impact the quality of Long Lake in a significant
way. Wind and seasonal changes...will have far greater impacts on the lake...than increased
motorized recreation...",
In light of the above Report findings, the Mitigation Plan regarding surface use (Appendix B-
18) is unwarranted and should be deleted from the report.
.
4
'.
.
Other Mitigation Plans And Restrictions
The Report, on page 75, states "The model shows a 7% decline in TP concentrations for Long
Lake. Most of this reduction is due to changes from agricultural land uses to rural residential.
Agricultural land use generally results in higher releases of sediment bearing phosphorus..."
In view of the above Report finding, the recommendation to restrict the use of residential lawn
fertilizers (Appendix B-l~) is not warranted.
On page 18 of Appendix B, the Report states "Consider establishment of adequate public access
to Long Lake, as this make (sic) [may?] increase eligibility for funding sources to improve
water quality."
2G"""' 9 f +r
The above statement is a political statement that is unnecessary to the environmental ~<;v
importance of the study. The recommendation for public access is contrary to the . I .' ilJJ 9 v-fr,J
recommendations restricting use of the lake and contrary to the historical, and current, , .
ownership of the lake and surrounding lands.
Figures 22-3 and 22-4, following page 93, show estimates of trips following "area land uses-
_build out." Of particular concem7.th.'e:rraps'@ply'th'a162rid Streef North Wilf'be a.major....~.
~~!otighf~fe'\Vithestlmafed .trips'.'t~f'5600.~a..6b69;~~pefti~eiy:;dilly'~~~Th~D}~~~~h9~<:lJ?e.> ,.
('J 1., ~~(fifiedI6reflecFlli. 'e:t:i "'is.rrnteiitions'. ie, --ardin" '62nd.'Street ':':'whlChT~~~~taI{d "Will remain
-v ~::~~~~!~~f;::l~;~~:X~~~'g{itle?trealiifen,(a5 the Report"-il r . C" ~
6 Z II .J. H wn'
Summary b L '^- (~~ J
1) Do not lower the level of Long Lake below 890'.
~..::---<-..J.- r O'71'J
( r:; / w ~rM'-b;
~" C$- ~- rr 1)
In summary, I strongly recommend the following:
2) Be more specific regarding the mitigation plans for storm water management,
particularly "upstream" from, and modifications needed for, Ponds P-Ll06, p-Ll07
and the Market Place Pond.
3) Be more specific regarding the recommendation for "removal of sediments collected
at the south end of Long Lake" (page 31).
4) Since the Report finds no increasing adverse consequences regarding surface water
use and phosphorus levels, delete the related mitigation programs that are not
necessary.
.
5) Do not portray 62nd Street as a major thoroughfare.
5
Finally, I believe that it is important that comprehensive and unbiased feasibility studies be
performed for all recommendations emanating from the Report. It is very important that
significant costs not be incurred that may only transfer the problems from one lake to another
lake. The sources of the problems need to be addressed, rather than transferring the problems.
Very Truly Yours,
~
"\
Richard L. Huelsmann
.
.
el
.
.
.
June 27. 1997
cH~
City of Stillwater
Klayton Eckles, P.E., City Engineer
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Subject: Comments on AUAR Report
Dear Mr. Eckles,
The following are comments and concerns related to the AUAR report. It is my understanding
from the recent open Council hearing that all concerns would be provided a response.
"
.
Water Level of Long Lake
The level June 23, 1997 was at 889'10". This level is about one foot
below the normal level of about 891' personally observed over most of the
last twenty + years. My point of reference is a very large stationary rock
near the east island. In addition the level is etched into the two large posts
protruding through the waters surface just off my lake shore. Evidence of
that historical height can also be gleaned from the corrosion lines on the
72nd Street lake outlet pipes. There are references in the report to Long
Lake high water problems, but the problem has for several years recently
been low level of water compared to the 891 normal level.
~
~
~
For several months this spring water has not even been flowing out of the
two 30" pipes on my property along 72nd Street. Despite the many recent
hard rains the water has still been too low to flow into Jackson ponds. A
proposal to lower the lake to 889 elevation would jeopardize the
recreational(power boating) aspect of the lake. These are the vary aspects
behind our fairly recent purchase of 500+ feet lake shore on this "
recreational lake at a si~~.f!~?1lt( 6..Jigur:<?} pr.~~!l_~._~~er _~h~ ..!l.2!'ll.?1..Y~':l~__.
of similar property. ~J"he'889' elevation is 2 feetbeloW:-no'rmaUevel.~With~,:~\
tthe-depths1>-~tween "7 sections 'of the lake" beiiigYailiershaIlow-ii6rmany;-a2~"",,<
~''',:,'_::-'''''''I' '''. ;...-_...__......~t"'.....-___.....:>!.......,........~.-_._r~...-Jj)....,.....-::...~.._.::;:.':"',;::.......~\.;;....-~.::...;;;:i-:r...,.. ".....,.,.; ..', ,',- _ _ -.
~f2~~~~~P-,~9~<!;2~~~B~~}tnP.~,~,.!;9~!P~~~$~f.70a,tJg:~i.~R~.~}~-~.l~,e-~~~:...:. -:~'.
.yaJEsJor~.Q.~J1.ll.gua:Qd"hence propertyy~.ueson the lake..~c; :"~ '
1\-\~
I~e~prop~sart()conf~l ~T~?Q..(i~"~~i!L~lci.q!.}i~.1.9~J1jfttn.~~~.,:.Qj~E9t .
ac~""iabItn.orlnesamerea..sons.-.Thelevei 'shoul<i' bf"controlled an1ie'-~
~\'V 1:;tRo~arrg9Yl~~er~~ft6e~jick~c;~~p~;(r~titl~t~~dill~d-ifri;~~s~ryt~"~ .. '~
~h!ntiiradequ~te'v61~in::e'-in~c:::ase"bf"1 o. year taii ~:JeriC'Othe~ than .
ha~~ine'nt' water'i~ 'a'low lying property(not on the lake)! several years ago
when the existing channel became obstructed, no one I have heard can
identifY any other flooded basement due to rising lake level during heavy
rains. The fear may be there, but that is the customary and nonnal risk of
owning property near or on water, especially for any homes built in
June 27, 1997
lowlands. It would seem to be reasonable that such homeowners assume
responsibility to take appropriate precautions against imminent flooding if
that should ever occur. The preservation of the recreational aspects (i.e.
water level at 891 )of Long Lake must be a goal in any action plans that are
established. '
.
· Drainagefrom Long !--ake . _ u. .' ,. __. .., ..~. ,. ..._ ,
Diversion of the lake prainage .flc>~fj-()~' entering Browns Creek to. :t
McKu'sidc ~ould be"~'co'ii~idehibie"cosr-c~Is~iii';t cosijustifled 't~~'-'-' 'i...~
-.~";I'-- . . . -. . ..... ~.. _....-....."-'...'...,.".~,-.;.-' .-....-..-,........:..-.. ~. ......' -
protect' Browns Creek from Long Lake overflow? :Today Browns
Creek has the trout(albeit stocked) and the plant and animal life that is
being considered, but remember that for over 20 years any Long Lake
overflow has gone to Browns Creek beC<ius.e the weir has been kept, op~n.
~ -There is no evidence in tetmS~f.~ata, ~hatJ.~'awar~ o~ shc;)\1iiJ.l8 J...png
~('I . Lake outflowhas.~?~~y.huri the creek environment over those 70 years.~y
V' '"Does that "evidence eXist? .1'hat very environment we are attempting to ,...
protect is still there after those 20 years! The watershed from Long Lake is
low( -10%) compared to overall watershed to Browns Creek. It is agreed
that the anticipated additional flow into Long Lake from development on
the lake's west side will be very minimal and not cause any anticipated
problem. Diversion plan to Lake McKusick would still allow any large.
overflow volumes to spill over t<.) the creek anyway. 'bivfrston pian' ~o__..:.::
~ IV ~~:t~'~~~~; 1:~~e::~ij~l~~~:f~~;Ttir ~;;:~sU~~;:i~nni: ~~llt~e
justify large dollar expenditure to divert Long Lake overflow from .e~.t.ering
Browns Creek. The 'cost!benefit- ratio needs to be correctly identified and P
. assessed... Is the experiditurejustified? .. .' ---
.
'The question of weir op~rCl~ion '()l1t,,9f l.ac::~o~ J'9.nq r~quires'the' ..-.".: ~. ~
"acCumulation of add,itional data to determine what really is theeffeci of . '"
~ t- ,:",ate~..~lo~lybeing rele~sed_ through the we.ir ~to Browns Cie~k i~.t~~,~f J:~.
water temperature, tempe~an:re. ef!e.~ of nuxmg waters and chenucal or ":.~ .
particulate matter level and its effect on the creek environment. f The fact
that the creek is environmentally viable today suggests that the effect may
be minimal and hence acceptable and not justify large dollar spending to
divert the overflow of Long Lake to McKusick Lake. Attention and funds
might be better directed to controlling the large watershed feeds into
Browns Creek rather than a minor one like Long Lake.
· Drainage into Long Lake
'The drainage into Long L~e fr~m f.Uture,..o/e~t".si~e. developmenfhas bee'I)" ';>
.,.-.-. .f'''' -. ." .... , ,~ '" ~,. ",\,.._~
\ 'l.-- studie~ in the,AUAR and determit:l~d to b~.yery'mi!1~~al and. n?t to bel :-~~~_.._. :;,
1< . concern. Other drainage into the lake from recent developmentan<i' othet..~,?
.
2
;
.
.
.
June 27. 1997
':Iactors~iouthof ihelakeneeds't~ be c9~tip~~t6~rii~~ introdJct'i6ri-6i"- .r
'".:.,:; ..,,~')~'~'''i'~!~:~~~~'''''''';:~.i...-:~..\I'''''''-''''''''''''':'O<.-~'' -,....._.._,......~.-.........._._. -.., -,I.. - ...~,_:-.. .-' .-
c~.rit~ri~mJ~and exCessive silting where possible.
.;.:-~_I.':_._.:.:.....v- ~,-
. North outlet of Long Lake '" " .._...'.._h... .. '_,_,
_._'._h'....... '.'...,. - , JJCI" .'....
:If any reconfiguration of the lake outlet on 72 ,- Street is planned:rwould-:--' >;'
~\ ~ ~:~~~~,:~.J~!~~~~t :ujjh~:p!~ ~s !he l~e .~utl~!}~ 9.npE9perty th~t (~-:T~~tlyn;~.;.~.,)
o,~:rhecreek(to Jackson Ponds) mlet IS on,p'~.property.. -,> ,
. Impact of sewer trunk line." '" '_..'.,.
'Ifappears'tl1at there' wo~ld be an impact by~lie_truriJC'lineshoWri th~t!t~!~S ..,
east and then north.' That route extends over mostly private, developed '.:0'
':.existing' properties. 'In one case the trunk line goes uphill as it turns from
east to' north and cuts through considerable number of existing tree lines on
~ \ '\ ~~: :~;:~~::~~:~irii&=~~~~:6~~~~r~~~~J~'
'publiCly'owned roads father _t.h.~ thro':lgh a privateiyowneCI 'road-way((e>
72nd streetfThisimpacidoesn'ot'ap'pear to be~addie~s~d iIi'thi report: )-
The~~ep.c:>it'sh6t.ild Suggest the souther1yr6.utlng:"'.':::'~;' '" ': . ..',
'.
. Traffic level on 72nd Street North
Trafficflow)s.not projected for 7~ Street N~''y,hichconneCts the/'
developing'area ~th the'existing cOnUnunit)r. . The concern is for' safety '.:
under higher v:olume traffic and the use of72~ as a s~ort l:U~ to Rutherford
~t Elementary. The road near the lake has several curves and blind areas'-
There is concern for children's safety from traffic as well as from the
element of isolation of the currently developed area and hazards due to the
proximity of the lake.:rp~"St.levei inciease'du~'fo higher tr~cvollime5' is' ·
~ 'Z-5''''~~?,:~'~'?ii~.eni,related' 'to health as well as ntii~ce':is it' is~a;dirl';'rd~1t~~;.~.,w. h
This opportunity to submit comments relative to the AUAR report is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely.
Ikdlll~
Don McKenzie
12620 72nd Street North
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 June 27, 1997
3
'"
er(~
d-~$~
~~
FRIENDS OF LONG LAKE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION
2921lvlarine Circle
Stillwater, 'MN 55082
.
June 23, 1997
Mayor Jay Kimble and
Members of the City Council
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, ~ 55082
Dear Mayor Kimble and Council Members:
The Friends of Long Lake Homeowner's Association submits the following comments
to the Stillwater Annexation Area AUAR.
In general, the AUAR appears to have focused most ofits activities on the
development of a "silver bullet" solution thatwill mitigate dangers to BroVin's Creek while
conducting only cursory study of environmental impacts in much of the remaining annexation
area. As a result, we feel the AUAR has accomplished only part of the necessary analyses.
The AUAR must be properly completed or an Environmental Impact Statement will be
warranted. .
.
The following are specific comments of study areas that require more complete analyses:
Long Lake Outlet Design
We appreciate the significant effort expended to find an engineering solution to the
currently inadequate outlet design. Hopefully, the new design will provide improved safety to
both homeowners and the Brown's Creek environment.
I G Weare concerned that the Long Lake watershed has now been estimated in three
, ..) different studies as varying between approximately 1500 and 2200 acres, jnclud'ing a
.~ft"L' s~gnificant difference found in rn:o studies in just the last 12 months., The correct watershed
..-' size should be accurately detennmed to assure the safety of homeowners and Brown's Creek.
C~' Whichever outlet option is selected, no new development should be allowed within the
.... /!, ::{i" 'annexation area until outlet modific~tions have. been, completed. This will avoid,placing th~
~:::. homeowners and Brown's Creek at mcreased nsk. , .
.~ jo' .
Water Oualitv
- The AUAR appears to have completed only a cursory study of the development
impacts on water quality of Long Lake, Lake McKusick, and the River.
.
I
.
$ \cb
~\i
4tti
.
2
The AU AR mistakenly grades Long Lake as a grade C lake. Data from the
Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District shows the lake has received D and
F Secchi grades since 1987, while phosphorus and chlorophyll levels have only been recorded
since 1995. The overall grade for the Lake was aD. .'
: Tables 18-1 and 18-2 on Page 74 clearly show the unacceptably high phosphorus
I' levels that currently exist in Long Lake and comments, "..., the TP values for Long Lake are
very high." Again on Page 75, the study states, "This trophic status translates into very poor
\ water quality conditions with severe limitations on uses for swimming, fishing, and other
I recreational uses." In the face of these statements, the AUAR then uses a Wisconsin study of
! deeper lakes to conclude that increased boating use will have no impact on Long Lake.
L-.
~
~,
Recently, we have been provided copies of independent studies of shallow pothole
lakes similar to Long Lake that demonstrate the very serious damage possible from some
water surface use alternatives. In addition, water and sediment samples were collected from
Long Lake in May that demonstrate the large quantities of organic sediment resting on the
Long Lake floor. A large portion of these particles will have a days-to-weeks settle time and_
will be carried from Long Lake to Lake McKusick, Brown's Creek, and th~ River, further
depleting the oxygen in these waters. Several residents have questioned the safety of
swimming in Long Lake and whether there are toxins or other hannful chemicals in the
sediment.
:-: The'.A1JAR-inus.i'gaiher-pi-'oper Sariiptes:of wa~~r .and bett'om sediments 'from Loni .
-Lake, the Jackso~\vitdlife &e~' the B~utVieli weii~d~~ and Lake McKusick i~ ~se~~'the -.--.
,- safety and, enVIronmental impact 'of water flows in the watershed:, Just as hydroloiic'studies -
.. '
were conducted, water quality impacts from up-stream sources and surface use must be
thoroughly assessed. We must not ignore the health of Long Lake, Lake McKusick, and the
River. In addition, the Association proposes that Stillwater and Oak Park Heights jointly
pursue state funding to cooperatively improve the water quality of Long Lake.
Wetland Impacts __....._._'__.__.'._.,.... " .... ".____,_,_._-.___~,...
The"1-PAR Sti1~y.1l}Jpeaz:s-io-.have-co.rnPI~~~~ ~.n.Iy'a..c,u:~otf~N~y~ C?r~e,_~ve~~p~ent ;-'-'
V .. ~pa~~ .~>~~t~~'~~~~~~~9.f.b9ijgf,3.k.~.-the J~~~~_?~. ~~ldlife 'ai~a;~ake McKusick, and the ,';~"
\ wetlarid,s, In tht? area ofBoutWeJl.~d. Neal Avenues. ~lgure 12-6 dIscusses the development .
impacts on wetlands in' the annexation area based only on storm bounces. Worse, the impacts
on Long Lake wetlands were not discussed at all! Jhe'aerial map (Figure 12-6) shows they
were intended to be discussed as Wetland #.12, bunhen appear to have been blacked out. The
AUAR must address the impact of water quality on all the wetlands.
Ve!!etative Buffer Strips
We agree with the need for buffer zones; however, there seems to be an inconsistency
in the recommendations for vegetative buffer strips around lakes and wetlands in the
annexation area. Page 73, Para. 1, talks about establishing 100 foot or more buffer strips of
undisturbed vegetation along Brown's Creek and its tributaries. Long Lake and Lake
McKusick need to be specifically named so that there is no misunderstanding of the necessity
for a 100 foot or more buffer strip around these lakes and wetlands.
In Appendix B. Page 22, the statement. "Promote the maintenance"or natural buffer
zones of at least 50 feet in width along the boundary ofwetlands.", seems to be in .
contradiction to the 100 foot recommendation noted above. We feel the AUAR should be
more assertive and require 100 foot buffer zones around all the Lakes and wetlands in the
annexation area as well as along Brown's Creek.
Wildlife
~Il ~~: t
collecte.d from the armexation area except' for the partial inventory' cond~cted under the
Stillwater Open Space Report. The biologist who conducted that inventory was never given
pennission to walk on the Neumann and other properties; heqce. no data exist for those lands.
We have attached a listing of waterfowl, birds. and animals that have been observed on a
-~~---.~.-"'~~-'-"~"'-l};
:e~~~,~a:~~~_'?~P~..b?~g ~a1c~and the For~~.edw~stem side. of !he lak:~.;~~th~~!\yg},h9'~.IQ..d'
do..an ~ventory'ofthe wildlife mthe entIre ~exatlon area and develop clear /{
:e~ornm~ft?a~~o.nsfor~ieseMng'hab1tat' andffiigratory comdors. ".., {
if-ll
Oak Forest
The AUAR briefly discusses the oak forest located on the western side of Long Lake.
This forest was identified in the Stillwater Open Space report as a significant resource for the
City of Stillwater to preserve, and even made recommendations to the City for investigating
purchasing the site. According to the DNR Map of Rare Communities. this patch offorest is
a remnant of the original oak forest which once covered all of Washington County. With care
~~""''--.'''''''--n
and management. this historic forest could be brought backto health. We feel t~~AUAR~
..__.. ~. .._....' 'n~o;_.. ...,_.....:""JOo-.__.~........_......._...._':O'__. .:;J:~_..o.r.--_.~- J"'"
.sho':l1~lg9'~..tP9.t9ug}fpI~fanqjyil,dlif~iiiventory of the forestarid.recomm~nd strategies to l
'p~ot~~'~(rtestoi~"mti~K;;gtliUs"':ar~-'an{fhistonc'-iesource:.;. .~:'........ ".~~.. ,.-., " .', I
The Friends of Long Lake Homeowner's Association contends the AUAR has not
satisfactorily completed the job of thoroughly assessing the environmental impacts of
development on Long Lake and other areas outside the Brown's Creek Ravine, We insist that
the task be completed or an Environmental Impact Statement will be warranted.
Sincerely,
Laurie Maher
Chairperson
c:
EQB
Metropolitan Council
3
.
.
.'
.
AmeriC2D Kestrel
Bald Eagle
Baltimore Oriole
Barn Owl
Belted Kingfisher
Blackbird
Blue Heron
Blue Jay
Brown Headed Cow Bird
Bufflehead
Canada Goose
Cardinal
,Catbird
Cedar Waxwing
Chickadee
Common Egret
Common Merganser
Coot
Crow
Curlew
Downy Woodpecker
Eastern Meadowlark
Eastern Screech Owl
~Iden Crowned Kinglet
~lden Eye
Goldfinch
Great Horned Owl
Green-backed Heron
Grey Owl
Hairy Woodpecker
Hooded Merganser
House Finch
Indigo Bunting
Junco
Killdeer
Loon
IHallard
Northern Flicker
Northern Water Thrush
Nuthatch
Pheasant
Pileated Woodpecker
Pintail
Purple Finch
Red-Bellied Woodpecker
Red Breasted Merganser
Red-Eyed Vireo
Red-Tailed Hawk
Red-Winged Blackbird
Redhead
Robin
Rose-Breasted Grosbeak
Ruby-Throated Hummingbird
Ruddy Duck
Ruffed Grouse
Saw-Whet Owl
Seagull
Snow Goose
Teal
Tree Swallow
Wild Turkey
Woodcock
Wood Duck
Wood Thrush '
Wren
Yellow-Headed Blackbird
.
Badger
Bats
. Beaver
Chipmunk
Coyote
Deer
Muskrat
Otter
Possum
Raccoon
Red Fox
Skunk
Squirrel
Woodchuck
Frogs
Salamanders
Toads
Painted Turtle
Snapping Turtle
Yellow Eared Turtle
I.
W ASIDNGTON COUNTY ?
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
GOVERNMENT CENTER
14900 61ST STREET NORTH. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006
612-430-6000 Fac:simle Mac:hine 612-430-6017
Dennis C. Hegberg
Oislric:t 1
Mazy Hauur
Oistric:t 2
W~ Abrahamcoo .
0islric:t3
June 17, 1997
Myra Peterson
District ~Cl\air
Dave Engstrom
Ois!lic:lS
Jay Kimble, Mayor
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
~ t-1J'k-1 V'VtU1.;:t:?
4. S fV-( 'd ta-tl/J--,
~4_~
~ uYVv-,
RE: Stillwater Annexation Area - Alternative Urban Areawide Review Comments
Dear Mayor Kimble:
Washington County has received and reviewed the Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the
City of Stillwater Annexation Area. Since Washington County is also acting as the Brown's
Creek Watershed Management Organization, comments relative to water management issues
have also been included with this letter. Comments were developed by a review of the report
followed by a County Board workshop held on June 10, 1997. At this workshop, staff and
Commissioner concerns were discussed and incorporated into the enclosed comments.
.
The Washington County Board of Commissioners appreciates the opportunity to participate
and COmment on this report. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions on this
matter.
Sim~ rx.i~~
Myra Peterson, Chair
Washington County Board of Commissioners
enc. Browns Creek WMO Comments for the Stillwater AUAR
Washington County Comments for the Stillwater AUAR
cc:
Environmental Quality Board, w/enc.
County Commissioners, w/enc.
James R. Schug, County Administrator, w/enc.
Washington Soil and Water Conservation District, w/enc.
Jane Harper . Washington County Physical Planner
I" N \"'P'.rL-V..,\i--~......
.
.-d on "Kyd'" r-t.(MI
EaUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
~
f)"
BRO.~K WMO COMMENTS FOR THE STILL W ATE.R (Alternative Urban Area-wide Review)
6/11/97
. Pag(.: 1
General Comments:
I) The annexation area comprises 10 percent of the Browns Creek Watershed. The .County is concerned that the mitigation measures may not be
sufficie,nt to deal with increased runoff from the other 90 percent of the watershed. The County realizes that the City has little, if any affect, over the
.1d upstream activities that may impact Browns Creek. However, the County asks that the City delay.any development in this area until a more
~r comprehensive evaluation of impacts on Browns Creek be completed. On June 3, 1997, the County sent a letter to the communities in the watershed
asking that they adopt a one-year moratorium on development. The time is needed to allow the local units of government and the Watershed
Management Organization to conduct a more thorough review of development impacts and mitigation strategies in the watershed. '-----' vJ L Jrttr \v /)
~r \:t-ll (\ ev- ~
~ 2) The WMO is listed as a Responsible Party on many ofthe mitigation items. While the WMO participated on the AUAR Technicill Advisory
Committee (through the SWCD), this action does not necessarily commit the WMO to the responsibilities listed in the Mitigation Plan. It is
suggested that the plan distinguish between the one Responsible Party and the other cooperating organizations.
~
~
r
3) Many of the proposed mitigation measures appear to be optional rather than required. The policies contained in the Browns Creek Watershed
Management Plan are also requirements of local water plans and ordinances. Therefore, minimum requirements of developments should be described
in the AUAR Mitigation Plan and these requirements should be consistent with the WMO and local plan and policies.
4) One of the single largest threats to the existing water quality in the lower reaches of Browns Creek is increased impervious surfaces. While
the AUAR plan discusses optional methods to minimize impervious surfaces and mitigation strategies to deal with increased flows, the real issues
~ and impacts of more impervious surfaces are not directly addressed. Since so much of the mitigation plan revolves around the successful
implementation of the proposed Lake McKusick diversion project, it is recomended that any approval of the AUAR be held until that project has
been review by the appropriate agencies and proven feasible. ,:' '. \ , ~
, "
Specific Comments:
!JM~tj!~iljl*~tf.]l~tJt~t,;1\~)1\tw.t~j!r~jm41~!r~Mifjr.i~f~ili&t.it~lft~J!&
2 - Stormwater Management 5
Study of An~exation Area
,..'
~i@1m.ilJiW[!fm~:;:~imr.1:1~[t~J.\!iiffit[ti~]i~~~mj,I~_i1.z.wiJl~: ~~wlj&twl~jll%ff
lft"
JjJ<.UWNS CREEK WMO COMMENTS FOR THE STILLWATER AUAR (Alternative Urban Area-wide Review)
6/1 1/97
Page 2
--~
1 3 - Infiltrate/detain Storrnwater 5, 6 City of Stillwater, I" 1 - WMO role is to participate with local studies and review anQ
WMO, Town of comment on local plans projects that could impact water resources.
Stillwater, Private ..I
Developers 11'3 2 - The types of Best Management Practices described in this section
should be mandatory not optional. Language such "Developers should..."
and "The City of Stillwater may..." suggest that these practices would
not be required, but rather just considered for u~e.
:~~]jifJj!JmI~~~~~ir:fi!~i~i.~f;1it!:~i~i~i!l]!lri~lI~i~~&1#}iW:rl~jlrl'~.t}I}ltTh1l~~11l~j.,
I ,9 - Water Quality Monitoring 7,8 SWCD, City, DNR, 1 - SWCD is NOT acting as the WMO, Washington County is currently
Trout Unlimited I: Cf the WMO. The SWCD is assisting the County with the planning and
implementation of watershed activities.
1 10 - Watershed Management Plan 8 WMO t . 10 1 - The "Second Generation Plan" is due June, 2000.
:~.f.~lrm~~~~ltlilf;
. i -, ,.. , "')' -"'dro~~d~ater Recharge
9
City, WMO,
Developers
1- ' 3 1 - Review would be done by WMO for consistency with Watershed
Management Plan.
2
7 - Groundwater Monitoring
Program
10
2. . 3 2 - The word "promote" suggests that this is a voluntary program rather
than mandatory. Why are these not mandatory requirements.
;mt~ms~~
!m1(>,~tm~Wf&W~,,*.
City, Washington 1. ,11 - Washington County should also be listed as a responsi'bfe party. The '
Co., WMO Washington County Department of Health, Environment and Land
Management has been assigned the lead in ground water protection for
Washington County.
. .,.
;~tf,ttl~I~i.jWili!m~~!~~j~~~1~~1~~1iliiiffi1rft1~.~ii~~lili~~i~~~1111W.i~i!
7 2 - Long Lake Protection Strategy 16, 17
(In-lake strategies)
, ,
.
1_
.
I3RO :WEEK WMO COM M ENTS POR THE STILL W A TEeR (A Iterna!;ve Urban Area-wide Review) 6/11/97 . rag, 3 .
-~@~~j
..'.7 .... 'W^W"'3":""[~~g"I'~I~" P~~t~;.ti;n St;~iegy ... " (7" ". .'....A WMON' :::;-;-.3- 1 - WMO to provide review and comment on projects in Browns Creek ...
(Long Lake subwatershed Watershed'.J
strategies)
7 4 - Integrated Water Quality 17 WMO 1-r4 1 - Possible improvement strategies could be incorporated into second
Management Plan for Long Lake generation watershed plan
mJi$BitiJgf,~if,~Wi~i!~;i~;;t;ii!!;!.i}f.&j~~~~M~~t~11tJI11~Iljf@1&I~~WIfJ~If!fiBr<'>:'>>:"
....S oW ..... ',' .T:....R~d'~~~v'Sedi~~.~tation. with . 17 ^, City'
Diversion Strategy (Goal 1 )
~l~:.
~ 1 - This protection strategy is suggesting to use the existing stream
~ channel to .settle out sediment. This proposed strategy is neither feasible
or appropnate.
9 2 - South Twin Lake Protection 19 WMO ~vv- 1 - South Twin Lake is not in the Browns Creek Watershed but rather the
lfr2.-Camelian-Marine Watershed District.
~ ' .~~&
~:....;.:. ~.;.:;: VA'",;,;':..:.:-x.>);. . :-:~:;:al~l~i<<~.~
+to+- 1 - The word "promote" should be changed to "achieve" to match the
language found in the Wetland Conservation Act.
;~wJlli;Ijl~i.l~i:I~:i:if.ftiii;:~;!11)t~!tMt;~fJ!~;;;J,~f~r~lH~ii~~~rt~li1~}llrj.i1iilil~~!~f~~]l:~;:::::..,.;~~[i~~~
11 1 - Wetland Protection 21 City, SWCD,
Regulations Corps, State
Agencies
m~wr.:m:mt~~r.~mntf:?;~
$:~:'<:S!.<~~~~:f.t9.<:-:'::'~::~~~~~!~'S::?~$':~::;~:':~":::i~-:
~~~~~~:;:'i~~>'=:<-~:-M:;':~*:~;>;o'.
11 3 - Wetland Mitigation Priorities
-f I v ') 1 - The City of Stillwater is the Local Government Unit for the Wetland
Conservation Act, not the WMO.
C:\MSOFFICE\ WINWORD\MJD\ WSD\BCWMO\AUARCOMM,DOC
fA /]
STILLWATER ANNEXATION AREA ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW
S till water Annexation Area
Alternative Urban Areawide Review
May 1997
Washington County Comments
GROUND WATER
113
~
pg 9, #3, Ground Water Recharge
Add Washington County to the list of responsible parties. The Washington County Department of
Health, Environment and Land Management has been assigned the lead in ground water protection for
Washington County.
....
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
lb. ?
pg 30, #1, Wildlife and Recreation Corridors
Mitigation Plan, pg 20, #3, Recreation and Natural Corridors
The Washington County Linear Park Master Plan includes a trail segment along CSAH 15 in the
Annexation Area. The County would like the City to plan for an offroad trail through this area that
would connect with future trail segments along CR 15 going north and south. TItis should be
referenced in the AUAR. Washington County should be added to the list of parties for the City to
work with.
LAND USE
Mitigation Plan
\,,7
pg 7, #7, Natural Resource Education
The Washington County Extension Office may have a role in this type of educational program. They
currently have a grant for work on nonpoint source pollution and land management on small acreages.
I
(;.0
pg 15, #1, Scenic Road Ordinance
pg 20, #3, Scenic Road Ordinance
pg 24, #2, Scenic Road Ordinance
The Washington County Scenic Road Overlay District Ordinance has not yet been adopted. The
County ordinance would not apply in the City of Stillwater. The City would need to adopt a similar
ordinance. Is that the intent of these references? If not, the reference to the ordinance should be
deleted.
.-
pg 24, #1, Local Road Design
14 i1 0 Remove Washington County reference from responsible party. The County doesn't get involved in
the design of local roads.
~ ~
.
.
?
.
ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC
.
General :
TItis document does not address interim traffic control and roadway mitigations that should take place
to support development.
r The County believes that the AUAR needs to address the traffic impacts of the proposed development
r more completely to help plan for future road improvements. The phasing of the annexation
\ development will have an impact when roadway improvements will be needed and at what level. The "
~ ~ 1--[ County must know the expected timing of development and the associated traffic impacts in order to
work with Stillwater and Grant to plan for road improvements. This information should be included
in the AUAR. .
,
CSAH 15 improvements are not in the County's 5 year CIP plans nor are improvements to the CSAH
12/CSAH 1-.5 intersection. Phase 1 of the annexation shows development taking place immediately
just east of CSAH 15 between TH 36 and CSAH 12. niere are no tr~c studies'that show how this
P. f'J.. 'L- phase of development will affect the road system.
The City should require traffic impact studies for each development and should require road
improvements to be funded by developers who are the catalysts for requiring them.
Specifically, the AUAR should include the following action items: .
1. The City, County and developers need to plan for immediate improvements to accommodate
11 ~ 1- traffic in Phase I. A complete traffic impact analysis for Phase I development needs to be
completed to help determine what these improvements should be.
.
2. An iterative traffic impact analysis should be completed to help determine when the traffic
~~ '2- levels will grow high enough, based on the expected development, to require. capacity
improvements on CSAH 15 between TH 36 and TH 96.
3. . Table 22.3, page 96, indicates level of service projections. It should also indicate what kinds
j5. ~ ~ of improvements will make the roads operate at an acceptable level of s~rvice for this ar.ea _
LOS C.
4. "t The AUAR needs to address transit/multi-modal transportation issues. Planning for the
~ l- annexation area should include some kind of park and ride facility.
5. It is extremely important to reserve adequate right-of-way for the necessary transportation
~'2..'2- improvements in the area....The City should make this a high priority when approving plats
adjacent to County facilities. / '
6.
~ 1.2-
As MnJDOT indicated in their comments on the AUAR Scoping document: "Currently
(CSAH 15 is) designated as a Class" A" minor arterial on the regional highway system.
CSAH 15 is a candidate for principal arterial status, and as such may at some time become a
state highway. (Its) primary function is to serve regional mobility needs. If an inadequate
local street network forces (CSAH 15) to serve local circulation and property access needs as
well, (its) capacity and safety will deteriorate." The County also believes this to be true and
asks that the City support the County in preserving CSAH 15's future mobility and principal
arterial status.
'.
~ <j
7.* l...lAccess to County roads should adhere to the Washington County Access Spacing Guidelines.
(See attachment.)
8. '}... Any roadway improvements along CSAH 15 need to be communicated to/worked out with the
*1- City of Grant as they will be directly affected.
.
Specific:
~~~
pg 9, Four-Lane Arterial Status
The AUAR states: "The County's Comprehensive Plan anticipates that CR 15 will be a four-lane
arterial, connecting areas in the County both north and south of Stillwater. This level of roadway
would be needed regardless of the level of development in the Annexation Area." This is not an
accurate statement. The planning for improvements to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 15 is
based on traffic forecasts which will be realized if development projections in the area are met _
which induCe expected development in the annexation area. If no additional development takes place
in the annexation area, there may not be a need for improvements on CSAH 15 between TH 36 and
TH 96. There has not been sufficient traffic analysis to determine this one way or the other.
~~ 1,.-
The transportation section of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan shows 2015 traffic
forecasts at 9,300 vpd north of 36 and 11,400 vpd north of 12 on 15. The Plan does not state that
CSAH 15 will be a four-lane arterial. It indicates that there is a forecasted need for capacity and
traffic operations improvements. What the capacity improvements will be have not been determined
yet.
The 2015 forecasts were based on the best available land use data for the area at the time the
Comprehensive Plan was being completed. Traffic data from 1996 shows volumes already reaching
~ the 2015 forecast. As noted in the Comprehensive Plan, the model used for traffic forecasting will
~ 1-- need to be periodically rerun to reflect new developments, roadway improvements or other changing
conditions in the County. The County is budgeting for a model update in 1998.
.
pg 14, Section 8, Permits and Approval Required
!R- \t\" Utility permits will also be required from Washington County.
:-
.
Design of McKusick Lake dike and discharge into Laurel Street ravine will likely affect County right-
of-way on County Road 64 (McKusick Road) and County State Aid Highway 5 (Owens Street).
County reviey,r and permits will be required.
pg 87, Section 22, Traffic
'* 1L,The peak hour tr~c volume should be 3050 vph (both in and out traffic).
*'~
pg 87-90, Existing Roadway System
Figure 22-1 should show CSAH 5 and CSAH 12 as minor arterials. The CSAH 15 designation does
not exist on Manning Avenue south of TH 36.
Figure 22-2 is not accurate (see attachment). The "existing" volumes do not reflect 1997 volumes.
~'L-1.t Are all the counts from 1996? A year source should be documented on all of the counts if they do
not reflect the same year.
.
~ ~.,
.
Since CSAH 5 is mentioned as a route used by vehicular traffic in the area. traffic volumes should be
_~ndicated on Figure 22-2. The following volumes are 1995 average daily traffic counts annualized:
CSAH 5 north of TH 36 = 13,300 vpd
CSAH 5 north of CSAH 12 = 9,200 vpd
CSAH 5 south of TH 96 = 5,400 vpd
t 1. McKusick Road is County Road 64. The latest counts on this road are from 1995 and show an
~ average annual daily traffic volume of 1,400 vpd.
pg 92, Annexation Area Trip Generation
~1Jr Table 22.2 - the footnotes should be labeled.
The elementary school may add traffic to the p.m. peak hour of the adjacent street traffic if school
~1-'lt hours are modified as have been discussed or if there are some after school programs such as "latch
key". ...
1-- Trips are taken away from the estimated annexation land use, trips. 111is is inaccurate. Section 7 says
~ ~ there will be 1,270 additional dwelling units in the area. Section 22 says that the existing 203 single
/' family dwelling units will be replaced. This does not make sense and the trips should not be taken
away from the annexation trips before they are assigned to the roadway system.
pg 93, Future Volume Projections
What was the basis of the directional distribution used for the traffic assignments? The daily volumes
t'Von Figure 22-3 seem low compared to the total estimated annexation land use trips on primary
~ roadways (= 25,485 vehicles per day).
__ What was the regional growth fuctor used to ~tOnnine the "totll" volumes? . .
1- What does it mean that "these planning volumes compare somewhat favorable with volumes provided
~q,; in the Washington County Comprehensive Plan?". '
pg 93/94, Roadway Systems Analysis
What are the assumptions that went into determining the daily level of service capacities? The level
of services documented for each of the roadway segments in Table 22.3 of the AUAR do not coincide
with the daily roadway capacities shown on Table T-3 of the Washington County Comprehensive
Plan.
~ '1,1.-
pg 96/97, Summary
~ 1- 'l.-The proposed net new land use daily. trip generation should be recalculated.
-9t.'L-The MnJDOT 2017 forecast for TH 36 west of CSAH 15 is 39,000 vpd.
'"
1-- MnlDOT and Washington County plan to initiate a TH 36 Corridor Study to identify a management
'9- '1i and long term approach for TH 36.
As stated before, the planning for improvements to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 15 is based
",'Ii on traffic forecasts which will be realized if development projections in the area are met - which
~ include expected development in the annexation area. If no additional development takes place in the
~exation area, there may not be a need for improvements on CSAH 15 between TH 36 and TH 96.
~r:r
pg 97/98, Mitigation Plan
1,.1.Private property access must be prohibited wherever possible to CSAH 15, TIt 96, CSAH 12 and
~ County Road 64.
~t1.Access to County roads shall adhere to the Washington County Access Spacing Guidelines (see
attached table).
.
4< ~ince this study does not address incremental traffic impacts to the roadway system, another bullet
should be added to the mitigation plan that reads: "Require complete traffic impact studies for
developments that are expected to generate over 100 peak hour trips."
...
.
~
.1
I
.
.
61Z
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
~..~~~..x..cn~..:.:_~~_..~~:~T':"""-':-:~:''r.;.~~~~_'\,.....-~~.~....-.__.....-''~~-=,:rJ
~ --::J/ ~
- V --
June 30, 1997
Mr. Klayton Eckles, P.E.
City Engineer
Stillwater City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
~
Dear rv1r. Eckles:
Re: Stillwater Annexation Alternative Urban Area Review
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above document. It has been reviewed by
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff, and we have the follov,ing comments,
The document appears quite extensive. Much of what is drafted is fairly generic, ho\vever. It
appears to recognize the difficulty of having new housing developments and maintaining a cold
water fishery. The success of maintaining this fishery will no doubt depend on the ability to
control construction site runoff in the short term and protect ground water flov,{s for the long
term. This will to a large extent be dependent on how closely development follows those
practices that are described in this report and other referenced documents, Inspection and
enforcement of best management paractices will be critical. We will be interested to see if
conditions can be maintained in Brown's Creek to continue to support the cold water fishery.
Brown's Creek is a unique and valuable resource that is worthy of protection. We would
strongly support the proposed monitoring efforts so we can learn from the proposed strategy.
Vlhile there is an effort to evaluate the impacts on lakes in the area (page 75))~tnere~Tftti~. ~.:.
-::r \ ~ -~.eY8.!uaf1o~-ottl1e.lncrease~'sedimeIlt or"p~osph6rus-Ioading tothe 'St.Croix Ri~e~" Th~ St. Croix.'
.River'-is'm'eriti'o~ed on thebottorri ofpage75, but not in the same detail as the lakes on previous'
pages of the document. This should be a much greater consideration at this time in the
document, especially in light of the diversion that is proposed to protect Brov;n's Creek.
* d The MP.C~' sT~ikeW~fer~As~essment7Rep?'ifh~s'Sec'chi,data"f6r:f~~~,~8Jce-that i~ ~ot ~~~ci in'
\ n ':th~ r,epo!1tA me~ Secchl depth of 0.6 m~ters_ls reported based on 28 s~ple~.'.Thls
corresponds to a total phosphorus of approximately 90 micrograms/liter which is near the
concentration sampled in the lake. No data was found for McKusick Lake or South Twin Lake.
'.
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; 51. Paul, MN 55155,4194; (612) 296-6300 (Voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY)
Regional Offices: Duluth. Brainerd. Detroit Lakes. Marshall. Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer. Printed on -e:jcied P:lP')' conr,:lInlng alleast 20"0 fibers Irom pa:e' re':icl-=oj bl C'Jr5,,'-'e-s
Mr. Klayton Eckles, P.E.
Page 2
.
We regret that the press of other work prevented a more thoroughgoing review. However, \ve
note that MPCA staff personnel were involved in the technical committees that did much of the
project planning. We greatly appreciate this involvement.
Thank you again for sending us this material. Please direct further discussion to
William J. Lynott at 296-7794.
Sincerely,
J?d~
Paul Hoff, Director
Environmental Planning and Revievv' Office
Administrative Services Division
PH:cj
.
.
.
.
.
:d,
c .. :.: r:
.... - - "..
"J- fr:r-:
. I... "" I ..
li.-.- .',;[. ~ : [. '. '.-to [...'..'.
..0 ......1..,[... . f.:',., C. f....o..o;:
II: : :.~.U
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rtl Avenue Ncr1h. Plymouth. Minne"'...ola 55447-4739
Telephone
612/476.6010
612/476-8532 FA.'<
June 13, 1997
~1r. Klayton Eckles
City of Stillwater
216 N. Fourth Street
Stillv.,'arer, :MN 55082
SUBJECT: Stillwater Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Conunents
Dear Klayton:
Following are the comments from Stillwater Township Board on the Stillwater AU.~:
Diversion Proiect:
. .
\Vhat are the stated benefits of the diversion project?
Suggestion: To protect the BrO.....ll's Creek conidor for its unique and fragile habitat so all area
residents can enjoy its natural beauty.
What is the entire project cost including land acquisitio~ pond C?nstruction, etc,?
Who will pay? \l/ill there be a cost/tax/fee to TO',lmship residents? Are grants available?
How can the remainder of the Brov."Il's Creed Watershed be brought into the process and
requirements of AUAR?" .
'What happens if diversion is infeasible for an)' reason?
What if portions of the plan are impractical or too expensive? What items could we live
without? Vihat would be eliminated if costs need to be cut?
Miscellaneous:
Will increased tishing impact the creek environment?
Long Lake outlet levels (889" or 890')? Explain choi~s and re.commendations more clearly.
All Equ,)/ Oppol'lunitl Employer
. : .... ,1
-. _' =t
Engineers
Planner3
Surveyors
:rl ~: ':~:r;:
.... ..... . ..
11:::;.H
l{' . 'I'E" - f' . '"f' p.',',.
I I . . ... ,...:.' I I ...
..~........ '. .. ..1.'.. .........
"J' ,'r: -, '7
.. I.. .....
l\lr. Klayton Eckles
City or Stillwater
AUAR Comments
Page 2
Clarify bern-een SEH Srudy and AUAR Study throughout document.
Labels and legends need to be added on maps.
Specific CommenU;,
Figure 11 ~ 1 should identify areas where trout are.
">
p.22 Impacts to Brown's Creek - are more fishing persons expected and what ",ill be the
impacts?
p. 23 Paragraphs 5 and 6 are contain long and confusing sentences.
p. 24 Protection Strategies: delete "implement the plan to" and begin sentence with "divert.Jt
, This is the first description of the diversion plan.
p.24 referl to "Stonnwater Management Study. Is this t1ie SEH Study or is it contained vnthin?
If\\;thin, where?
p, 25 d. ends with "Adopt and enforce (Shoreland) Ordinance, including the Annexation Area.
\\'hat does this phrase mean?
p. 27 2nd paragraph - unfinished sentence.
p. 27 last paragraph) 2nd sentence does not seem needed. '
p. 30 Jackson Wildlife Management Area - missing the acreage.
p. 31 2nd paragraph - affects sib effects.
p. 32) 1st paragraph safeguard s/b "safeguards" 3rd paragraph make sib mai'.
p 38 3rd paragraph reads "through the Jackson Wildlife Area wetlands are proposed to be
converted to wetlands to enhance the existing wetlands) provide wetland mitigation opportunities
.. . nfus-
'" IS CO mg,
p, 40 In describing benefits) (2) says, "Erosion of do~nstream wetland and the loss of channel
stability for the stream channel south of Bout\J..'ell Road will not be a Concern. tl Please explain.
p. 40 (5) 'Why will the cost of rerouting be less?
p. 41 Paragraph 2 - "maintain high water levels at acceptable levels" ???
. '4
e
.
.1
.
.
I.
.\ I.
.: .:.: ';
".. ......'~
11:::;.H
li~~:~E:~ :F.'~~r F.O((~
......1'.. .. ... ....,r. ..__
'f ,'" ",'"
: r:. ... :.. .
. '4
Mr. KJayton Eckles
City of Stillwater
AU..\R Comtnents
Page 3
p. 41 Paragraph 3 needs more explanation; it is unclear what the levels will be.
Figure 12-5 needs a title, north arrow and labels.
p. 48 1st sentence doesn't make sense.
Tabl~ 12-4 says "continued" Is a page missing?
Figure 13-1 needs a legend.
Figure 13-2 is "unsuitable" and absolute? Although it may be desirable not to locate a well in
this area, does that mean it is "WlSwtable" or just ''undesirable''? How does the City weigh this
recommendation with piping and cost considerations?
p. 71 2nd paragraph "adsorption" sib "absorption".
.
Mitigation Plall;
Clearer e:\-planation of implementation. perhaps use an example of development to help lay
persons to understand how ADAR recommendations may be implemented.
If there are any questions on these comments, please feel free to call me at 476-6010. Thank
you, for the oPPOrtunity to comment.
xc: Sheni Buss, Bonestroo & Associates
Town Board Supervisors
Pat Bandi, Tov.'Il Clerk
.i
I
S.1N:tIWWO:J
0.1 :tISNOdSn II
.
.
STILLWATER AUAR
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS - WORKING DRAFT
.
TROUT UNLIMITED COMMENTS
Comments Relating To AUAR Text
Page 1, paragraph 1: Responses 1-4.
1. At the start of the AUAR, the City recognized the lack of existing data and has throughout the
AUAR process, added considerably to the amount of available data in the form of hydrologic studies,
projected changes in land use, wetland impacts and analysis of groundwater impacts, In addition,
as part of mitigation, the City is working with the County and Brown's Creek WMO to monitor
water quality and quantity parameters at several locations within the annexation area.
2, During initial meetings with the DNR to discuss Brown's Creek groundwater issues, we were
given estimates that groundwater contributions are 30% to 50% of baseflow in the lower section of
Brown's Creek. When the DNR published Report #95-22, Brown's Creek, Washington County,
these estimates were revised to 20% to 40% of baseflow. We also note the We acknowledge this
correction. We have
3, We have attached a copy of the groundwater model (Appendix C) used to develop the Brown's
Creek well exclusion zone shown in Figure 13.2, including model assumptions and input parameters.
Should new municipal wells be located near the boundary of the well exclusion zone, additional
analysis will be performed to evaluate potential impacts to groundwater discharges to Brown's
Creek.
.
4. Section 13 of the EA W has been attached. This section includes text and discussion not
originally included in the Draft AUAR. Also included attached is Appendix C, showing calculations
for the Brown's Creek groundwater protection zone.
Page 1, paragraph 2: Response 5
5. The DNR has monitored stream flow and temperature for approximately two years. In
addition to this data, several fisheries surveys have been completed with additional flow and
temperature data gathered. While we agree that additional data documenting predevelopment
conditions on the water quality and quantity of Brown's Creek would be desirable, It would be
difficult, if not impossible to establish pre-development conditions now since much of the
Brown's Creek watershed is already developed or intensively farmed. As proposed in the
mitigation plan, monitoring of Brown's Creek and tributaries will be started as soon as possible
.
.
.
.
to establish existing conditions and to serve as an early warning to water quality and quantity
changes.
Page 2, paragraph 2: Response 6 (Stream Quality)
6. We acknowledge that limited existing water quality data is available for Brown's Creek. To
address the lack of water quality data, we have proposed mitigation strategy 2.9 requiring the
implementation of a water quality monitoring program which would monitor water quality
parameters in accordance with MPCA and Metropolitan Council water quality monitoring
guidelines. Additional strategies to protect the water quality of Brown's Creek are addressed in
Section 2 of the Mitigation Plan (Appendix B).
..,
A point made in this paragraph also warrants clarification. It is stated that "Given that peak
outflows from long lake will still be directed towards Brown's Creek" and implied that these
peak outflows will have a major impact on water quality. Water quality monitoring studies
generally show that the "first flush" from large storm events or small storm events (e.g., 2 1/2
year storm events or less) contribute the majority of loading to receiving water bodies, Since the
McKusick Lake diversion will completely route all stormwater runoff in the annexation area up
to the 2 1/2 to 3 year storm event, loading from the major contributing storm events (from a
water quality standpoint) will be eliminated. By the time peak discharges occur in a given storm
event, particularly for large events, the majority of "flushing" has already occurred, thus the
proposed McKusick Lake diversion is an improvement over existing conditions in Brown's
Creek from a water quality standpoint.
Page 2, paragraph 3: Response 7 (Other Issues)
7, The City of Stillwater will comply with all DNR permits requirements.
Page 2, paragraph 4: Response 8
8. For work involving the realignment of Brown's Creek, the City will work with consultants
experienced in stream restoration with the goal of expanding trout waters where feasible.
Page 3, paragraph 1: Response 9
9. Although much of Brown's Creek lies within the annexation area, as a resource, Brown's
Creek is a stream of regional importance, being one of only seven remaining trout streams in the
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. As such, it is reasonable that cost to preserve this resource
should also be shared on a regional basis.
2
TROUT UNLIMITED COMMENTS
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
No comments on Mitigating Plan.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page 2, paragraph 5: Response 1
...
1. The cover type section of the report is not intended to provide an in-depth, qualitative
assessment of natural communities, although some description is provided. The City, however,
agrees that the wetlands and woodland communities along the west side of Long Lake are a
significant natural resource. This is indicated on pg, 27, paragraph 5, of the report.
Page 2, paragraph 6: Response 2
2, The City has expressed a willingness to work with developers to preserve as much of the
woodland and forest west of Long Lake as possible through easements, public and private open
space, shoreland setbacks and buffer strips. Because most of this land is privately owned, total
protection of all woodlands and forest areas west of Long Lake is not under the control of the
City. The mitigation plan specifies a number of different protection strategies to encourage the
management, protection and preservation of forest and woodland resources in Section 3, Goal 5
of the Mitigation Plan.
The comment concerning buckthorn as a desirable shrub species is surprising sense it is generally
known that buckthorn has negative impacts on the diversity of groundcover, shrub and tree
species in forest and woodland communities. The DNR's Element Occurrence Ranking
Guidelines for oak forest (DNR, 1994 clearly use the presence or absence of buckthorn as a
qualitative indicator for ranking oak forest and woodland natural communities.
Page 2, paragraph 7: Response 3
3, We acknowledge that the spelling of "water thrush" should be "waterthrush".
3
.
.
.1
.
.
.
Page 3, paragraph 1: Response 4
4. The last sentence of page 22, paragraph 2 should read: " The DNR does not stock or actively
manage the upper portion of Brown's Creek because there are no public lands, fee title or
easements which allow public access to the creek".
"Angler" is used in place of "fisherman" in the text.
Page 3, paragraph 7: Response 5
5, The sentence should read" While this rare feature element occurs outside the annexation area,
potentia) impacts from stormwater discharges to Brown's Creek could occur.
Page 4, paragraph 2: Response 6
6. Our approach to this section is to link the quality of wildlife habitat to the ecological integrity
of natural communities. While oak woodlands make up a significant portion of the annexation
area, we are trying to acknowledge wildlife values for all natural communities including mesic
and dry oak forest, maple-basswood and lowland hardwood forest as well as prairie and
wetlands. Rather than describing wildlife resources for each community type, we have stated the
value of wildlife habitat in relation to the quality, diversity and connectivity of natural
communities.
Page 4, paragraph 4: Response 7
7, While we agree that a comparison with other similar lakes would be useful, we believe the
primary purpose of this document is to compare existing water quality conditions to anticipated
water quality conditions under the proposed development scenario. We have attempted to show
this through the use of the Canfield-Bachman lake model. We used this model because it
contains within its data set, several shallow lakes and reservoirs with mean depths of
approximately three meters and with basin morphometry similar to Long Lake. While this model
may not perfectly simulate actual conditions, we believe it is the best available model for Long
Lake.
Page 4, paragraph 5: Response 8
8. We were notified of these concerns during meetings with the DNR (after the draft AUAR was
submitted for review) and have agreed that no wetland creation/mitigation will be done within
the Jackson Wildlife Management Area.
4
Page 4, paragraph 6: Response 9
9. We have added this information to Figure 12-5 (attached).
.
Page 4, paragraph 7: Response 10
10. Because of the uncertainty over ponding outside the annexation area, it would be more
accurate to state that the diversion to McKusick Lake will protect Brown's Creek up to a 2.5 year
storm event. If the City of Grant agrees to construct storm water ponding as recommended in the
AUAR, the potential to provide protection up to the 3 year storm event will be possible. The
City of Stillwater will work with the newly formed Brown's Creek WMO to encourage upstream
stormw3"ter ponding in adjacent communities.
Page 4, paragraph 8: Response 11
11. Currently, stormwater runoff enters the Brown's Creek tributary and thus Brown's Creek,
mixing with the cool groundwater seepages both in the tributary and in Brown's Creek. Under
the proposed McKusick Lake diversion, less stormwater will be entering Brown's Creek (in spite
of development) up to a 2 1/2 to 3 year storm event. In the statement referenced in the question,
we are referring to stormwater entering Brown's Creek.
Page 5, paragraph 2: Response 12
.
12, Our intention here is that during non-storm events, the sluice gate could remain open
allowing base flow from the tributary to continue flowing into Brown's Creek. During storm
events, when most of the runoff is from warm surface water, not groundwater sources, the sluice
gate would be closed so that the warm surface water runoff does not enter Brown's Creek
resulting in dilution of cold water sources within Brown's Creek. Future monitoring of the
tributary could be used to develop an operation plan for the sluice gate. If monitoring indicates
that base flow is significant, meaning that the flows are from cold spring water sources, the sluice
gate could be operated to allow for passage of these flows into Brown's Creek during non-storm
events. If monitoring indicates that cold spring water sources from the tributary is not
significant, then all flows can be diverted from the tributary to Lake McKusick for the 2 1/2 to 3
year storm event. This determination will be made as part of the McKusick Lake Diversion
Feasibility Study.
5
.
.
.
I.
13. We have met with DNR staff on-site to look at different channel alignment alternatives. We
are fully aware of the constraints to constructing a channel, not only along the Zephyr Railroad,
but also within the McKusick Lake wetland. While we only show the "Zephyr alignment" in the
draft report, we will give equal and full consideration to the "wetland alignment" referenced in
Mr. Chisholm's June 13th memorandum to Mr. Barstad. We will invite the DNR to participate
on a Technical Committee for the McKusick Lake Diversion Feasibility Study. This Technical
Committee will review the pros and cons of these two stream alignment options.
An additional concern is the type of stream channel constructed. As part of the McKusick Lake
Feasibility Study, we will evaluate the most appropriate stream channel type based on such
factors as upstream and downstream cross-sections of Brown's Creek, anticipated flows, soils
and property ownership, The pros and cons of different channel types will be evaluated by the
McKus~ck Lake Feasibility Study Technical Committee.
Page 5, paragraph 5: Response 14
14. Our description of proposed stormwater ponding locations is shown in Figure 12-4 of the
draft report. Table 12-5 provides information on individual pond area, storage volume and peak
outflow. Specifically, Table 12-5 list this information for pond B-1 03 which is the pond located
at the diversion structure. This pond, unlike other proposed ponds within and adjacent to the
annexation area, would be designed to impound stormwater runoff to an elevation where the
necessary hydraulic head is created to divert flows to McKusick Lake. Without this hydraulic
head, diverting flows to McKusick Lake is difficult and would require pumping. Even if
pumping is used, it is still necessary to construct a pond from which to pump water. The
potential environmental impacts of this diversion structure have been discussed in Section 12,
Physical Impacts on Water Resources and in Section 18, Water Quality-Surface Water Runoff of
the draft AUAR Report. The design and environmental impacts of the diversion structure and
associated ponding with be further evaluated in the McKusick Lake feasibility Study.
The issue of out letting land-locked basins to Brown's Creek from areas outside the annexation
area is beyond the scope of the ADAR. We have however, shown the approximate locations and
design criteria for ponding to service existing drainage into the annexation area (and Brown's
Creek) in Figure 12-4 and Table 12-5, We have not attempted to estimate, nor can the City of
Stillwater control, out letting landlocked areas outside the annexation area into Brown's Creek.
The City of Stillwater will work with the Brown's Creek WMO and adjacent communities to
encourage stormwater management practices that protect Brown's Creek.
Page 6, paragraph 1: Response 15
15, Table 12-6, summarizing wetland communities and impacts, was mistakenly omitted in the
draft report. This table is attached for your review,
6
Page 6, paragraph 2: Response 16
16, The City of Stillwater will update the Shoreland Management Ordinance, if required by the
DNR, to meet current state standards,
Page 6, paragraph 3: Response 17
17. The City is in the process of completing a feasibility report for sanitary sewer interceptors for
the annexation area. Both of the proposed alignments are shown in Figure 19-1 (an updated and
improved Fig. 19- 1 is attached), It is assumed that at least some dewatering will be necessary
regardless of which alignment is selected. The City acknowledges DNR concerns over
dewatering and that the DNR may include special provisions, including limiting the amount of
dewatering and groundwater monitoring, for groundwater appropriation permits.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
Comment #1:
Page 24. McKusick Lake dike will change wetland types.
Response:
Likely changes to wetland types is noted in the plan. Changes were proposed as a
necessary tradeoff for the protection of Browns Creek and its ravine, including rare
wetland communities in the ravine.
Comment #2:
Page 24. Hazel Street stormwater issues are causing erosion in the Browns Creek ravine,
Response:
The City is aware of these problems, and has adopted a 5-year capital improvement plan
that includes the design of a new stormwater drainage system and erosion control for the
Hazel Street area to eliminate these problems.
7
.
.
.1
.
.
I.
Comment #3:
Strengthen language for stormwater management strategies, Goal 1 #3 and 4.
Response:
The language in the Mitigation Plan has been changed, as suggested by the DNR.
Comment #4.
Extend habitat corridor protection to all of Browns Creek.
Response:
This language has been changed in the Mitigation Plan as suggested by the DNR.
Comment #5, and Comment #1 under Mitigation Plan on page 6 of DNR letter:
Development of a pedestrian path in the Browns Creek ravine in incompatible with the
resource.
Response:
The Township Board recommended removal of the Browns Creek Ravine trail Goal from
the Mitigation Plan based on the DNR's recommendations. This goal (previous Goal #4)
has been removed,
Comment #6:
Protection of oak forest and habitat values.
Response:
The City is working with developers in the area west of Long Lake, to include portions of
the oak woods in trail and park dedication areas required by the Cities Comprehensive
Plan and Subdivision Ordinance, and will use its Forest Protection Ordinance to try to
maintain woodland values. However, the area is privately-owned, and the City has no
additional authority to protect the area. The area was reviewed by the Stillwater Parks
8
and Open Space Committee for potential purchase as open space, but was not valued
highly-enough among the sites reviewed to be purchased.
.
Comment #7:
Oak woodland restoration should be included in the Mitigation Plan,
Response:
Goal #5 and its strategies suggest "Implement Stillwater's Forest Protection Ordinance
and encourage management, protection, and restoration of woodland resources in the
Annexation Area."
Comment #8:
Page 14, Mitigation Plan. A forest is more than trees.
Response:
We agree with this comment. The Mitigation Plan suggests protection of high quality
woodlands in the Browns Creek Ravine, and includes strategies in the mitigation plan to
protect woodlands in the Annexation Area where it has the authority to do so. The
Mitigation Plan encourages the use of native trees, shrubs, and other understory plants in
landscaping plans, in acknowledging the importance of all plant layers in the forest.
e
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page 1, Item 8, Response 1
1, The City is in the process of completing a feasibility study for sanitary sewer service to the
annexation area. Once this feasibility study is completed, sanitary sewer service connection
plans will submitted to the to Metropolitan Council Environmental Service Municipal Services
Staff for review.
9
.1
.
.
.
Page 1, Item 12, Response 2
2. Our intention is to create a natural stream channel, that will potentially expand trout habitat
within Brown's Creek. We intend to use a natural, open channel wherever possible. The City of
Stillwater has authorized a feasibility study to evaluate options to realign Brown's Creek, During
this feasibility study, a Technical Committee will be assembled with representatives from the
DNR serving to provide input on different stream channel alternatives.
Page 1, Item 13, Response 3
3, We believe the estimates used to establish the groundwater protection zone for Brown's Creek
are conservative and therefore it might be possible to site the municipal well one-half mile east of
the intersection of County Highways 15 and 12 in Section 30. Prior to locating a municipal well
at this location, additional analysis will be performed to assure that no negative impacts to
Brown's Creek ground water sources occur.
Page 1, Item 16, Response 4
4. We have added a legend to Figure 16-1 and attached a copy of this Figure for your review,
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
No comments on Mitigation Plan.
RICHARD HUELSMANN
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page 1, Paragraph 2, Responses 1 and 2
1. There is no contradiction with the indicated preference for option #1 with regard to the
statement" the slower Long Lake releases water, the more water is diverted to McKusick during
the very large storm events". This is a benefit because our objective is to divert as much storm
water as possible away from Brown's Creek. Diverting more stormwater to Lake McKusick
means less storm water going to Brown's Creek.
10
2. Tables 12-1, 12-2 and 12-3 all summarize the relative benefits of the two options including
peak flow rates, high water levels and duration of high water levels following storm events. Our
goal in the AUAR was to suggest what we believe to be the best overall mitigation strategy, The
McKusick Lake Diversion Feasibility Study recently authorized by the City of Stillwater will
explore both options in greater detail.
Page 2, Paragraph 2, Response 3
3, No long term data exist on water elevations of Long Lake; however, a review of aerial photos
dating to the middle 1930's shows a wide range of lake levels, ranging from no water in the lake
during the middle 1930's to high water conditions during wet years such as 1993, The point is
that, climatic cycles playa large role in dictating lake elevations and can be expected to continue
to do so in the future.
Page 2, Paragraph 5, Response 4
4. It is small storm events, not large storm events, that we are mitigating for on Brown's Creek.
Option #1 diverts more water to Lake McKusick than option #2 and therefore provides a greater
level of protection to Brown's Creek while still maintaining adequate water levels on Long Lake.
Page 2, Paragraph 6, Response 5
5. Stormwater pond P-L106 referenced on page 52 is a proposed stormwater pond.
Page 3, Paragraphs J -3, Response 6
6. The City of Stillwater has no control over stormwater management outside its boundaries.
The City will work with the Brown's Creek Watershed to encourage adequate ponding for
storm water volume and rate control as well as nutrient and sediment removal.
11
.
.
.
.
'.
.
Page 3, Paragraph 4, Response 7
7. We have made the suggested changes to Figure 19-1 and attached for your review. Additional
information on advantages and disadvantages of Plan A and B will be provided in the Sanitary
Sewer Feasibility Study to be completed during the summer of 1997,
RICHARD HUELSMANN
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
Comment #1:
'\
Protection strategy 2, "Evaluate methods for improving water quality in Long Lake,
including outlet improvements, removal of sediments...", is too general
Response:
Description of possible improvements for Long Lake will be detailed during the
Feasibility Study, to be completed by the City immediately following the ADAR.
Addition survey information, design studies, and cost analyses are needed to detail these
improvements, and these will be completed during the Feasibility Study.
Comment #2:
"Mitigation Plan regarding surface use is unwarranted and should be deleted from the
report."
Response:
This item was deleted, to make the section consistent with the earlier portions of the
AUAR.
Comment #3:
"Recommendation to restrict the use of residential lawn fertilizers is not warranted."
12
Response:
While the AUAR analysis indicates that agricultural land uses typically result in larger
amounts of phosphorus runoff than residential uses, runoff from residential uses may still
affect the quality of the lake. Recommendation for the City to consider adoption of an
ordinance regulating use of lawn fertilizers remains in the Mitigation Plan, to address
potential pollution from residential land uses,
Comment #4:
"Establishment of public access to Long Lake is unnecessary"
'\
Response:
Establishment of a public access on Long Lake is included in the Stillwater
Comprehensive Plan. Technical Committee members indicated that providing such
access may increase the eligibility of the lake for grants to improve water quality, and is
therefore an environmental, rather than political, recommendation. The recommendation
remains in the plan.
DON McKENZIE
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page 1, Paragraph 1, Response 1 (Water Level of Long Lake)
1. The AUAR has evaluated different options which balance the water levels of Long Lake and
Lake McKusick with the trout fisheries of Brown's Creek. The options recommended in the
AUAR provides the best overall solution with all of the City's natural resources considered
collectively. In order to provide an adequate safety margin (against flooding) for larger storm
events, it is necessary to maintain the elevation of Long Lake so that adequate storage of runoff is
provided. The 891 elevation does not provide the necessary freeboard to handle larger storm
events, In addition, providing storage within Long Lake reduces the frequency of discharges into
Brown's Creek.
13
.
.
.
.
.
I.
Page 1, Paragraph 3, Response 2
2. If the outlet elevation is established at 891 and the Jackson Pond control structure is designed
to discharge water rapidly enough to avoid flooding, problems associated with high runoff
volumes and rates will occur downstream, Under this scenario, discharge of stormwater to
Brown's Creek would increase, resulting in negative impacts to the trout fisheries,
Page 2, Paragraph 2, Response 3 (Drainage from Long Lake)
DNR fishery surveys and studies of Brown's Creek indicate that in recent years, the temperature
of Brown's Creek has approached and in some cases exceeded the lethal limit for Brown Trout.
The stuaies show a strong correlation between stream flow and temperature, with temperature
going up as flows increase following summer storm events, As development continues within
the Brown's Creek watershed, thi~ impact is expected to worsen. Although Long Lake has been
outletted to Brown's Creek for over 20 years, it is only recently, that large-scale commercial and
residential development has occurred with stormwater directed to Brown's Creek. The rest of the
Brown's Creek watershed, while contributing significant stormwater inputs, is largely
undeveloped and therefore does not generate proportionately, the same volume of runoff as the
lower portion of the Brown's Creek watershed,
Page 2, Paragraph 4, Response 4 (Drainage into Long Lake)
Stormwater runoff from proposed development on the west side of Long Lake will be controlled
through stormwater ponding and site specific Best Management Practices to reduce runoff.
These stormwater management practices will be designed to reduce the rate and volume of runoff
as well as provide for water quality treatment, including contaminants and sediment (see Goal 1
Mitigation Strategies in Appendix B).
Page 3, Paragraph 3, Response 5 (Impact of sewer trunk line)
The Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study will evaluate these issues
DON McKENZIE
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
No comments on Mitigation Plan.
14
FRIENDS OF THE LONG LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page 1, Paragraph 3, Response 1 (Long Lake Outlet Design)
The 1975 Long Lake Outlet Study omitted portions of the Long Lake watershed within Oak Park
Heights, Bay town, Lake Elmo and the City of Grant. More recent estimates of watershed area
are much closer with differences likely due to the use of small scale USGS Quad Maps with 10
foot ,coiltours. This problem will be remedied through the use of new, 2 foot contour maps which
the City has recently authorized as part of the McKusick Lake Diversion Feasibility Study,
Page 2, Paragraph 1, Response 2 (Water Quality)
We acknowledge your correction for the overall grade of Long Lake as D.
Page 2, Paragraph 2, Response 3
Boating and associated water quality issues are being addressed through the Long Lake Surface
Water Use Committee.
Page 2, Paragraph 4, Response 4
A nutrient budget analysis was performed for all lakes in the annexation area. Additional water
quality analysis is beyond the level of detail provided in the AUAR.
Page 2, Paragraph 5, Response 5 (Wetland Impacts)
The two primary factors which impact wetlands (outside of drainage and filling) is from
stormwater inundation (or bounce) and nutrient loading, We have clearly stated mitigation
strategies under goal 12 of the AUAR Mitigation Plan to address pretreatment of stormwater
prior to discharge to wetlands through the use of detention basins and buffer strips. That leaves
stormwater bounce as the remaining critical impact to wetlands.
15
.
.
.
.
.
I.
Since the Jackson WMA wetlands will operate at the same water elevation as Long Lake, the
bounce shown for these wetlands, also applies to Long Lake, Section 18 of the AUAR includes a
nutrient budget analysis for Long Lake.
Page 3, Paragraph 2, Response 6 (Wildlife)
As stated on page 33 of the Draft AUAR, the key to preserving wildlife resources is the
protection of natural communities which serve as wildlife habitat. The AUAR Mitigation Plan
list numerous ways to preserve the wetlands, oak forest and woodlands which serve as wildlife
habitat. Ultimately, however, the fate of most of the land on which wildlife habitat exist is
determi~ned by private landowners.
Page 3, Paragraph 3, Response 7 (Oak Forest)
The mitigation strategies listed under goals five and six of the AUAR Mitigation Plan address
these concerns.
FRIENDS OF THE LONG LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
Comment #1:
"100 foot buffer strips along Browns Creek and its tributaries."
Response:
Long Lake and Lake McKusick are not tributaries to Browns Creek, as identified in
Minnesota Rules 7050,0420. This rule identifies trout stream tributaries, and these are
the streams recommended for buffer strips in this recommendation of the Mitigation Plan.
Buffer strips for lakes(90 feet) are recommended in the City of Stillwater Shoreland
Management Plan Draft and in the Mitigation Plan, Goal 8 #4,
16
Comment #2:
"AUAR should require 100 foot buffer strips around all Lakes and wetlands in the
Annexation Area"
Response:
Recommendations for buffer strips around lakes and wetlands were developed from
MPCA document "Buffer Zones", June 1997, As noted in the mitigation plan,
recommendations for wetland buffer zones should be based on an assessment of wetland
function and value. The City of Stillwater has adopted a recommendation to complete
such a plan, Goal 11, #2, and is using the 50-foot buffer while this plan is developed. The
50-foot zone is generous in comparison to most communities in the Metropolitan Area
(most use a l6-foot zone), and is based on the review of scientific literature included in
the "Buffer Zones" report.
\V ASHINGTON COUNTY
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Note, additional comments relating to traffic issues forthcoming.
\V ASHINGTON COUNTY
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
Comment #1:
page 3, Washington County is the WMO
Response:
List is changed to indicate that Mark Doneux, SWCD, is "representing the Browns Creek
WMO".
Comment #2:
page 8, Washington County, not SWCD, is the WMO
17
.
.
.
.
.
.
Response:
Text is changed to assign the role to the SWCD, rather than the WMO.
Comment #3:
page 9, Washington County has the lead in ground water protection
Response:
'.
Washington County is added to the list of Responsible Parties for this item,
Comment #4:
page 21, Washington County/Browns Creek reference should be removed.
Response:
Reference was removed from this item as a Responsible Party.
Comment #5:
Include reference to off road trail along CSAH 15, and add Washington County to list of
cooperating organizations.
Response:
Reference to off road trail has been included in Goal 5, #2, and Washington County listed
as a Cooperating Organization.
Comment #6:
page 6, #3, delete reference to Washington County/Browns Creek WMO
Response:
Reference has been deleted.
18
Comment #7
References to Scenic Road Ordinance, page 15,20, and 24, should be deleted.
Response:
References have been deleted.
Comment #8
page 18, Add City of Stillwater to list of responsible agencies for Long Lake water quality
...
Response:
City of Stillwater has been added to list of Responsible Parties for Goal 7, #3 & 4.
Comment #9
page 19, Remove Washington County/Browns Creek WMO from list of responsible
Parties for South Twin Lakes Area.
Response:
Washington County/Browns Creek WMO has been removed from the list of responsible
parties.
Comment #10
page 24, Remove Washington County from list of agencies responsible for design of local
roads,
Response:
Washington County has been removed from the list of responsible parties.
19
.
.
.
.
.
.
Browns Creek WMO Comments. Mitigation Plan:
Comment #1:
"The County sent a letter to communities in the Watershed asking that they adopt a one-
year moratorium on development."
Response:
The City of Stillwater recently completed a 3-year Comprehensive Planning process
with Stillwater Township regarding the Annexation Area and appropriate levels of
development. The City has delayed development in the Area already to complete the
AUAR, which provides a thorough analysis of impacts on Browns Creek and other
natural resources, and presents a Mitigation Plan to avoid, minimize or mitigate for the
impacts of proposed development. Given its commitment to responsible development in
the Annexation Area, the City respectfully declines to comply with this request.
Comment #2:
"The WMO is listed as a Responsible Party. . . the plan should distinguish between
responsible parties and cooperating organizations,"
Response:
These changes have been made as requested throughout the Mitigation. plan.
Comment #3:
Mitigation measures appear to be optional. Requirements should be consistent with the
WMO Plan.
Response:
A performance standard has been established for the mitigation measures referenced here
(Goal 1, #3), The standard is as follows: "The combination of strategies chosen should
maintain the peak discharge rates for 2, 10, and 100-year rainfall occurrence conditions
from less than or equal to pre-development conditions." Within this standard, the city and
developers will work to choose among appropriate options for each development site.
This standard is identical to standards included in the WMO plan for stormwater
management.
20
WMO standards for stormwater management, wetlands management, and erosion control
have been referenced in the Mitigation Plan under Goals #1 and 11, and all requirements
for Best Management Practices in the Mitigation Plan are identical to those prescribed in
WMO Plan.
Comment #4:
"While the AUAR plan discusses optional methods to minimize impervious surfaces. The
real issues and impacts of impervious surfaces are not directly addressed.
...
Response:
A variety of options for limiting impervious surfaces are included in Goal 1, #3.
Suitability of options will vary by development site, based on soil types, development
types, opportunities for ponding, etc. The City will work with developers to choose the
most appropriate strategies for each development, and has included provisions in its
Comprehensive Plan to vary from current city requirements and significantly reduce
amounts of impervious surface. However, it is difficult to estimate the result of reducing
impervious surface on cumulative stormwater flows to Browns Creek from the
Annexation Area. Therefore, the diversion strategy described in Goal 1, #1 was
developed for the AUAR, to ensure that potentially-damaging stormwater flows will be
diverted away from Browns Creek.
Comment #5:
A lengthy list of Specific Comments was provided by the WMO, mainly editorial
corrections to the Mitigation Plan
Response:
Each of the suggestions was implemented, and the Mitigation Plan was changed to reflect
the WMO request.
21
.
.
I
.
1
.
.
.
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Comments Relating To AUAR Text
Page I, Paragraph 3, Response I
The AUAR has recommended a variety of mitigative measures including buffer strips, reduction
of impervious surfaces, encouragement of infiltration and detention ponding to provide for
pretreatment of stormwater runoff prior to discharge into wetlands, lakes and water courses. All
waters diverted through McKusick Lake will have been pretreated prior to discharge to the St.
Croix River.
~.
Page I, Paragraph 4, Response 2
We acknowledge this additional information and will include it in the final draft of the AUAR.
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Comments Relating To Mitigation Plan
No comments for Mitigation Plan
STILL WATER TOWNSHIP
Comments Relating to AUAR Text
Page I, Diversion Project
Comment: "What are the stated benefits of the diversion project"
Response: The diversion will divert 2 1/2 to 3 year storm events from the annexation area to
McKusick Lake and then into the St. Croix River, bypassing the lower portion of Brown's Creek.
This will allow for greater flexibility in controlling water levels and flooding problems on Long
Lake while preserving the trout fisheries of Brown's Creek,
Comment: "What is Project cost?, Who will pay?....."
Response: These questions will be addressed as part of the feasibility study,
22
Comment: "How can remainder of the Brown's Creek Watershed be brought in the process and
requirements of the AUAR?"
Response: This is an issue for the Brown's Creek WMO to determine.
Comment: "What happens if diversion is infeasible for any reason?"
Response: Our analysis in the AUAR shows that the diversion is a realistic and achievable
solution to manage stormwater in the annexation area. The McKusick Lake Diversion Feasibility
Study will determine in greater detail what the most cost-effective diversion approach is and to
what le~,el of protection the diversion will provide to Brown's Creek.
Comment: "What if portions of the plan are impractical or too expensive ......"
Response: All of the mitigation strategies (including how practical they are) were discussed
during Technical Advisory Committee meetings. The mitigation plan provides a great deal
flexibility in terms of which strategies are used in a given situation. This approach allows the
development community to choose among the best strategies that are most effective and cost-
effective under the circumstances.
Page 1-2, Miscellaneous
Comment: "Will increased fishing impact the creek environment?"
Response: It is outside the scope of the AUAR to predict if fishing pressure will increase in
Brown's Creek and what any impacts of increased fishing might be.
Comment: "Long Lake outlet levels (889 or 890)? Explain choices and recommendations more
clearly."
Response: We will clarify our recommendations in the final AUAR.
Comment: "Clarify between SEH and AUAR Study throughout document."
Response: We will do so in the final AUAR.
23
.
.
.
.
.
I.
Comment: "Labels and Legends need to be added on maps."
Response: We adding these to several maps in the report.
Page 2-3, Specific Comments
Most of these comments are editorial or request clarification or additional explanation of
statements. We will include these specific comments in the Final AUAR Report.
"\
STILL WATER TOWNSHIP
Comments Relating to Mitigation Plan
Page 3, Mitigation Plan
An example of how the mitigation plan might be carried out could be shown in the Final AUAR
Report, The difficulty in doing this, is that every site is unique and would require a somewhat
different set of mitigation strategies. It is likely that the first developments guided by the
Mitigation Plan will serve to demonstrate how to apply mitigation straightedges most effectively.
24
.
NV'ld NOIIVDIIIW .
HVIlV III
.
APPENDIX B
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
1.0 Introduction
This comprehensive environmental protection plan has been prepared as a part of the Alternative
UrbaD- Areawide Review (AUAR) process for the City of Stillwater Annexation Area. This plan
is intended to satisfy the AUAR rules that require preparation of a "mitigation plan" that
specifies measures or procedures that will be used to protect the environment from potential
impacts of development of the Annexation Area. The plan also provides management
recommendations for maintenance and restoration of important natural areas. Finally, the plan
specifies legal and financial measures and institutional arrangements that will assure that the
mitigation measures recommended in the plan are implemented. The mitigation plan will be
used by the City of Stillwater to guide development of the Annexation Area through the
avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation of environmental impacts.
The plan is not intended to modify the regulatory agencies' responsibilities for
implementing their respective regulatory programs, or to create additional regulatory
requirements. This mitigation plan is not intended to deprive or divest any person of any
use of property or right to which they are entitled by law. Finally, the AUAR and this
mitigation plan may be silent as to environmental concerns or impacts that may arise later
within the context of specific development proposals, and could not be anticipated during
the AUAR process. This should not be construed as a bar to requests for and commitments
by the City and project proposers to compile new and/or additional environmental impact
information and analysis.
.
The AUAR indicated that several important regional natural resources are potentially affected by
proposed development in the Annexation Area: Brown's Creek, the Brown's Creek Ravine,
Jackson Wildlife Management Area, and the St. Croix River. Other resources of local
significance such as Long Lake and McKusick Lake may also be affected by proposed
development. The mitigation plan specifically addresses measures for the long-term protection
and management of these natural resources in Sections 2.0, 4.0 and 5.0. Protection measures that
will avoid or minimize environmental impacts to wetlands, woodlands, and other natural
resources in the Annexation Area are provided in Sections 3.0 and 6.0. The protection of
historical and archaeological resources is addressed in Section 7.0. Protection measures for
other potential development-related impacts, including traffic, air quality and noise issues are
discussed in Section 8.0. The plan provides overall goals for each resource, then strategies that
describe specific measures to be implemented to achieve each goal. The final section of the plan
lists the plans, ordinances, and regulatory tools that the City of Stillwater has in place to
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitif:ation Plan
5/6/97
2
implement the Mitigation Plan.
The City of Stillwater recognizes that the emphasis of the AUAR is to closely examine the
environmental impacts of proposed development in the Annexation Area as described in the
Stillwater Comprehensive Plan. In addition to environmental impacts, the City must consider
other issues as the area develops, including land use, design issues, finances, economics, and
transportation concerns. The City must balance all of these concerns along with environmental
impacts through specific plan development and design review process.
The Mitigation Plan is proposed based on existing conditions and existing information at the
time of its writing. If new information, conditions or mitigation methods develop after the
approval of this plan, the City may convene representative members from the natural resources
agencies and organizations on the Technical Committee to consider the new information and
develop new recommendations to meet the goals identified in the Mitigation Plan.
Finally, this AUAR specifically identifies and analyzes the environmental impacts of
development within the Annexation Area. However, actions outside the 1800-acre area are
beyond the control of the City of Stillwater, and may affect the natural resources that the
Mitigation Plan protects or mitigates. The City of Stillwater is committed to try to coordinate
protection of the natural resources with other agencies and organizations as listed in the
Mitigation plan, and others that may impact the natural resources of the Area, particularly
Brown's Creek.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
3
The Goals and Strategies included in this plan were developed with the assistance of a Technical
Advisory Committee for the AUAR process. The assistance of these individuals and their
organizations is gratefully acknowledged.
.
Participants in the Technical Committee meetings included the following:
Jim Almendinger, St. Croix Watershed Research Station, Science Museum of Minnesota
Wayne Barstad, Minnesota DNR Ecological Services
Kathy Don Carlos, Minnesota DNR Division of Wildlife
Mark Dpneux, Washington SWCD (representing the Browns Creek WMO)
Annette Drewes, Minnesota DNR Trout Stream Coordinator
Hannah Dunevitz, Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Program
Klayton Eckles, City of Stillwater, City Engineer
Jerry Fontaine, Stillwater Planning Commission
Gary Huber, Trout Unlimited
Dwight Jelle, Westwood Development
Jim Larson, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services
Meg McMonigal, Stillwater Township
Lee Miller, Friends of the Long Lake Homeowners
James Perry, University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources
Jim Peterson, Trail Head Development
Charles Prokop, Minnesota Trout Association
Marc Putman, Charles Cudd Companies
Steve Russell, City of Stillwater Community Development Director
Richard Schubert, Friends of Browns Creek Ravine
Molly Shodeen, Minnesota DNR Division of Waters
Gene Soderbeck, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Sheila-Marie Untiedt, Stillwater Township
Mary Vogel, University of Minnesota College of Architecture
and Landscape Architecture
Dave Zappetillo, Minnesota DNR Division of Fisheries
Tony DeMars, Bonestroo, & Associates
Bob Schunicht, Bonestroo & Associates
Sherri Buss, Bonestroo & Associates, Facilitator
.
.i
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR MitiKation Plan
5/6/97
4
2.0 Brown's Creek and its Tributaries
Brown's Creek and its tributaries within the Annexation Area are classified as Trout Waters (MN
Rules 7050.0420). Upper portions of Brown's Creek above the Stone Bridge are considered
marginal trout habitat. Brown's Creek has been ranked as one of the six highest priority trout
streams in the Metro Region. Brown trout are stocked in the stream at catchable size for
recreation purposes. Natural reproduction of trout in the stream is limited, Fishing pressure on
the creek is heavy, due to its accessibility to Metro Area anglers, including mobility-restricted
anglers. The presence of Brown trout in the stream is an indicator of high water and habitat
quality, -these conditions also help to support a valuable assemblage of rare species and
communities that survive in the Brown's Creek Ravine.
The City of Stillwater has proposed a set of goals and strategies in this section to maintain the
water quality and hydrologic regime of Brown's Creek, to maintain the health of trout habitat and
natural communities in the Ravine as development occurs in the Annexation Area.
Goall:
Protect and Maintain the Current Quality of Surface Water Inflows to
Brown's Creek.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement the plan to divert discharge from Long Lake and stormwater runoff from the
Annexation Area and Grant Township (south of the Minnesota Zephyr railway tracks) to the
wetland north of McKusick Lake. Reconfigure the outlet at the north end of Long Lake to
maintain the lake at a normal elevation of 889-890, and direct flows north through the
existing drainageway to the McKusick wetland. Reconfigure this drainage ditch to a stream
channel form, which will be more stable than the ditch. Remove,the current dike at the
north end of McKusick Lake, and build a new dike at the north end of the wetland, to create
a basin to hold the entire runoff from the Long Lake and the Annexation Area up to a 2.5-3.0
inch rainfall event (occurs approximately every 3 years in this area). (Monitoring protocol
described in #9 below.)
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DNR, local landowners
Regulatory program: DNR Outlet Permit No. 76-6047, Wetland Conservation Act
Implementation time frame: City will complete a feasibility study of this diversion
strategy by September, 1997. The study will include a cost estimate and recommendations
for equitable distribution of costs for implementing the diversion strategy. The city will
implement the diversion based on results of the study.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
2. Implement the Stormwater Management Study for the Annexation Area developed as a part
of the AUAR, that emphasizes the protection of water quality in Brown's Creek, and sets
forth criteria for the design and performance of storm water detention basins to reduce peak
flows into McKusick Lake and Brown's Creek. Identify and implement opportunities for
regional stormwater detention basins within the Annexation Area and in surrounding
communities that drain through the Annexation Area to Brown's Creek,
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township
Cooperating organizations: Browns Creek WMO, cities adjacent to the Annexation Area
Regulatory program: Minn. Statutes 103B.235 and Minn. Rules 8410
Implementation time frame: Design and construct detention facilities as development is
proposed.
3. The City of Stillwater will work with Developers to implement strategies to infiltrate and
detain stormwater to reduce runoff to surface waters and increase infiltration. The
combination of strategies chosen should maintain the peak discharge rates for 2, 10, and
100-year rainfall occurrence conditions from any development area at less than or equal to
pre-development conditions. The City of Stillwater Subdivision Ordinance allows for
modifications through its design review process to accommodate a variety of strategies to
infiltrate or detain stormwater and meet the identified performance standard:
a. Reduce street coverage
· Reduce residential (local access) street widths and lengths.
· Use "T" cul-de-sacs or establish vegetated islands designed to hold stormwater.
b. Design and locate buildings to reduce impervious surfaces and retain infiltration areas
· Use cluster development that maintains open space and minimizes impervious surfaces.
· Reduce front setbacks to reduce driveway length.
· Maintain vegetated swales or detention areas between back lot areas to infiltrate and
route water.
c. Reduce parking areas
· Encourage cooperative parking
· Use parking standards that reflect average parking needs instead of peak day
projections.
d. Private developers in the Annexation Area may also chose to implement the
following:
· Provide infiltration areas
· Use rural road sections without curb and gutter treatments, that drain to wet or dry
swales. Plant these where possible with native vegetation types.
· Identify soils with high infiltration capacities, and cluster development and route
drainage to maintain these as open space areas and infiltrate storm runoff.
· Use infiltration basins.
· Maintain or create detention basins that release water when it has cooled to less than
65 degrees F
5
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
I
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
6
· Use permeable pipes to transport and exfiltrate storm water
· Direct downspouts from roofs over yards or other vegetated areas and away from
driveways or paved surfaces
. Use aerators, sand beds, or other cooling strategies to reduce the temperature of runoff
or pooled water before it enters Brown's Creek
· Protect or encourage plantings of native vegetation on public and private properties,
including woodlands, prairies, and wetlands, to promote storm water infiltration and
provide habitat and aesthetic values.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township, Private Developers
Regulatory program: Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Stormwater Management ordinance,
Special Area Plans and Development Agreements, Browns Creek Watershed Plan
Implementation time frame: As development is proposed. City will review development
proposals for consistency with the AUAR and Mitigation Plan. Provisions of the Stillwater
Comprehensive Plan and Special Area Plans allow flexibility from standard subdivision
requirements to implement cluster development, narrower street widths, and other practices
suggested above.
4. Require the use, management and enforcement of Best Management Practices
(BMP's) and Wet Stormwater detention basins to control erosion and sedimentation during
and after construction of projects in the Annexation Area.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township
Cooperating organizations: MPCA
Regulatory program: Stormwater Management Ordinance, NPDES Permit Program,
Development Agreements, Browns Creek Watershed Management Plan
Implementation time frame: Immediate
5. Maintain or restore an unmown vegetated buffer at least 100 feet in width above the a.H.W.
along the corridors of Brown's Creek and its tributaries in areas developed after adoption of
the AUAR. (The O.H.W. will be measured from the top of the bank along Browns Creek and
along tributaries where the top of the bank is visible. Where the top of the bank is not
identifiable, the buffer will be measured from the centerline of the stream.) A wider buffer
zone may be required where needed to protect floodplains, wetlands, steep slopes or
important fish and wildlife habitat areas. The width of the buffer zone should be based on the
quality and function of these habitat areas. Encourage landowners to plant native trees,
shrubs, tall grasses, herbaceous and wetland plants in this buffer strip to increase shading of
Browns Creek and tributaries to maintain water temperature for trout habitat.
Amend Draft Shoreland Management Ordinance (February, 1997) to include Brown's Creek
and its Tributaries, including regulations for Vegetation Management, Diseased Vegetation,
Buffer Zones, Fertilizers, Pesticides, and Oak Tree Management. Adopt and enforce
Ordinance, including the Annexation Area.
Stillwater AUAR Miti!?ation Plan 5/6/97
7
.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township
Regulatory program: Development and Subdivision Ordinance, Shoreland
Management Ordinance, Floodplain Ordinance
Implementation time frame: The City will amend ordinances as needed to require a
minimum 100' vegetated buffer and management regulations along Brown's Creek and its
tributaries. Amendments will be completed by December, 1997.
6. Protect and enhance in-stream habitat and riparian trout stream habitat along Brown's Creek
and its tributaries in areas of existing development, including vegetated buffer areas,
groqndwater recharge areas, pools, riffles, and other critical components of trout habitat. A
continuous stream habitat corridor should be protected along the Creek downstream of the
Stone Bridge.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township
Cooperating organizations: DNR, Trout Unlimited
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: As development occurs
7. Develop and conduct annual educational programs for local residents on the value of natural
resources in the area, the effects of yard care practices on these resources, and options for
homeowners to assist in protecting resource quality.
Responsible parties: Washington SWCD, Trout Unlimited, City of Stillwater,
Public Interest Groups, Washington County Extension Service
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Ongoing
.
8. The City should work with Washington County and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation as plans are completed for alteration of State Highway 36 and County
Highways 15 and 96, to identify potential water quality and quantity impacts to Brown's
Creek and impacts to other natural resources, and develop strategies to avoid or mitigate
these impacts.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington County, Minnesota DOT
Regulatory program: Voluntary coordination
Implementation time frame: Designs for these roadways are currently being developed and
reviewed.
9. Implement a water quality monitoring program, including water temperature, dissolved
oxygen, water quality and quantity parameters, in accordance with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) and Metropolitan Council water quality monitoring guidelines, as
.
.
.
'.
Stillwater AUAR Miti~ation Plan
5/6/97
8
specified in Minnesota Lake and Watershed Data Collection Manual (MPCA 1994) and An
Evaluation of Lake and Stream Monitoring Programs in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
(Metropolitan Council 1989).
Monitoring stations will be placed in the following locations: 1)lower end of Brown's Creek
where it meets the St. Croix; 2)near the Stone Arch Bridge; 3) near Neal Avenue and the
railroad tracks; 4) at County Road 15,5) on the stream tributaries west of McKusick Lake;
and 6) at the Long Lake outlet. Beginning in spring, 1997, these stations will be regularly
sampled for water temperature and flow data. In addition, macroinvertebrate samples will be
gath,ered and analyzed in for 2 locations, at the upper and lower ends of the Creek. Samples
will be taken three times during the summer.
Automatic monitoring stations at the Stonebridge and the lower end of Brown's Creek will
also collect a variety of water quality data.
The Washington Soil and Water Conservation District will collect and analyze the results of
monitoring on Brown's Creek, and report the results of monitoring to the City of Stillwater,
Metropolitan Council, resource management agencies, and other interested organizations.
The Science Museum of Minnesota and other partners are developing a proposal for short
and long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Brown's Creek Watershed, including the
Annexation Area, to include additional
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington SWCD, Minnesota DNR, Trout Unlimited
Metropolitan Council, MPCA, St. Croix Research Station-Science Museum of Minnesota,
Stillwater High School Science classes (biological monitoring)
Regulatory program: Voluntary program. Funding and resources will be provided by all of
the Responsible Parties or Public Interest Groups
Implementation time frame: Monitoring will begin during June, 1997. Washington SWCD
will prepare the water quality monitoring plan with consultation of other responsible parties.
Data collection will begin in 1997, and continue annually with results to be published in the
annual report of the Browns Creek WMO and entered into the STORET database.
10. Encourage the development of a Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan for the
Brown's Creek Watershed that models conditions in the Watershed at full development;
identifies issues and problems for water and other natural resources in the Watershed based
on this analysis; and identifies goals, strategies and responsibilities for addressing these
issues and problems.
Responsible parties: Browns Creek WMO, other local governments and natural resource
agenCIes
Regulatory program: Minnesota Statutes 103B.
Implementation time frame: The "second generation" WMO plan is due for completion in
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
9
June, 2000.
Goal 2:
Maintain or improve the quantity and quality of groundwater discharges to
protect the baseflow of Brown's Creek.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Locate the new municipal well proposed for the Annexation Area outside the Area
determined to affect groundwater flows to Brown's Creek.
...
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DNR
Regulatory program: Minnesota DNR Water Appropriations Permit Program
Implementation time frame: New well will be sited before development begins
2. Encourage abandonment of private wells in the Annexation Area. Well abandonment will be
implemented in accordance with procedures of the Minnesota Department of Health.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: City of Stillwater
Implementation time frame: Will be implemented by the City as development occurs.
3. Promote a "no-net-loss" of groundwater recharge capabilities for the recharge area of aquifers
discharging to Brown's Creek and its tributaries. Implement the strategies listed in Section
2.0, Goal!, Strategy #3, to decrease the proportion of impervious sUIface area, add buffer
zones and retention basins, and use other strategies to increase rainfall infiltration in the
Annexation Area to maintain groundwater flows to Brown's Creek.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Washington County, private developers
Cooperating organizations: Browns Creek WMO
Regulatory program: City Subdivision Ordinance, Special Area Plans,
Stormwater Management Ordinance, and Development Agreements
Implementation time frame: Implement as developments are proposed,
.
.
.
.
.
i.
Stillwater A UAR Miti!:ation Plan
10
5/6/97
4. Complete field surveys to identify shallow groundwater areas before utilities are constructed
near Brown's Creek or its tributaries. Avoid construction of utilities in close proximity to the
creek, its tributaries, and wetlands in the Annexation Area when feasible.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington SWCD
Regulatory program: Best Management Practice
Implementation time frame: Complete as part of feasibility study for utilities in the
Annexation Area, to be completed by September, 1997.
....
5. When utility construction near streams and wetlands is necessary, require use of trench dams
or other barriers, and backfilling of utility trenches with native material near Brown's Creek
and its tributaries to prevent drainage of shallow groundwater in the area.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Best Management Practice
Implementation time frame: Implement as utilities are constructed in the Annexation Area.
6. Encourage owners of the Oak Glen golf course to discontinue using ground water wells for
irrigation, and explore the feasibility of replacing this source with water from the McKusick
wetland. This may protect groundwater sources as well as increase the storage potential of
McKusick Lake.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater to contact Oak Glen owners
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Spring, 1997
7. Implement a groundwater monitoring program within the Annexation Area.
Cooperating organizations: City of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota DNR
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Implement as early as possible in 1997
Stillwater A UAR Miti!:ation Plan
5/6/97
11
.
3.0 Natural Areas in the Annexation Area
The majority of high-quality natural areas that may be affected by urban development in the
Annexation Area are located within the Brown's Creek Ravine. The lower one mile of Brown's
Creek in the N Y2 Sections 20 and 21, T30N, R20W, is a biologically significant ravinelcreek
system, based on information collected by the Minnesota County Biological Survey. The Survey
noted that less than 6 percent of the land area of Washington County remained in high quality
natural communities in 1991. Three natural communities occur within this system-a high-
quality maple-basswood forest, mixed hardwood swamp, and moderate quality bluff prairie.
Breeding ancUoraging habitat of the Louisiana waterthrush (Seiurus motacilla), a special concern
species, is also documented in this area.
While all of these rare feature elements occur outside the Annexation Area, potential impacts
from stormwater discharges to Brown's Creek and other development-related impacts could
affect the quality of natural communities and habitat areas in the Ravine. The Louisiana
waterthrush is particularly sensitive to increased flows from stormwater because the bird nests
and feeds along the stream bank near the stream's normal water level. Increased flows may
inundate nesting and/or critical feeding areas. Changes in surface and groundwater quality and
quantity with increased development may also affect the viability and quality of hardwood
seepage swamp communities.
An additional natural community of concern is an oak forest located along the west shore of
Long Lake, in the West Y2 of Section 31, T30N, R 20W. This oak forest community was also
identified by the Minnesota County Biological Survey in 1990. In 1995, this area was surveyed
more intensively. This survey suggested that the highest quality forest remains in the eastern
areas of the woodland near Long Lake, while western areas have been degraded by invasion of
exotic species. Development of-sewers, roads and residential subdivisions may affect the quality
of this natural community.
.
The City of Stillwater has proposed goals and strategies in this section to protect and restore
natural communities in the Brown's Creek Ravine, while developing opportunities for passive
recreation that are compatible with the long-term health of these communities. The section also
includes goals for managing oak forest communities, and mitigating for losses that may occur
with development of the Annexation Area.
Goal 3:
Maintain or restore the quality of Brown's Creek and the Ravine Area,
including sustaining the health of the Louisiana waterthrush habitat and
trout habitat, and maintain or restore native plant communities.
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
12
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement the stormwater diversion to McKusick Lake, Stormwater Management Plan,
infiltration strategies, other BMP's, and monitoring strategies described under Goal #1,
strategies 1-8, to maintain the current quality and quantity of storm water flowing to the
Ravine from the Annexation Area, to maintain the Louisiana waterthrush habitat and
hardwood seepage swamp communities.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater and others listed under Goal 1
Reg,~latory program: Listed under Goal 1
Implementation time frame: Identified for each strategy listed under Goal 1.
2. Implement Stillwater's ShorelandIBluffland Management Ordinance and Restrictive Soils
Ordinance to protect the Ravine, and encourage vegetated buffer strips with required 40'
setbacks from the bluff line to protect the natural slopes in the Ravine.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Development and subdivision ordinances, ShorelandIBluffland
Management Ordinance (No. 784), Restictive Soils Ordinance (778)
Implementation time frame: Ordinances are currently in effect.
3. Work with the Minnesota DNR's Natural Heritage Program and Fisheries Division to
develop a restoration and management plan for the Brown's Creek Ravine, including
Louisiana waterthrush and trout habitat and native plant communities that are part of the
Ravine complex. Adopt the plan as a part of the City's Parks and Open Space Plans.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DNR
Regulatory program: City Comprehensive Plan and Natural and Cultural Resource
Protection Regulations
Implementation time frame: Adopt management plan by Spring, 1998
Goal 4:
Implement Stillwater's Forest Protection Ordinance and encourage
management, protection, and restoration of woodland resources in the
Annexation Area to provide functions such as stormwater infiltration,
wildlife habitat, and climatic amelioration.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement Stillwater's Forest Protection Ordinance in the Annexation Area, requiring careful
construction and development plans and practices within wooded areas affected by
development activities. Add standard Oak Wilt Protection Provisions to this Ordinance.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
13
(These provisions describe measures to control the spread of oak wilt: When possible, avoid
cutting, pruning or injury to oak trees between April 15 and July 1 of each year. When
construction occurs during these months, a vibratory plow should be used to sever roots along
the edge of any construction area prior to beginning work, and injuries must be treated with a
tree wound dressing within 15 minutes or less to reduce infection potential. Tree protection
zones should be fenced during construction to prevent all entry.)
.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DNR Division of Forestry
Regulatory program: Stillwater Forest Protection Ordinance (No. 769)
Implementation time frame: Ordinance is currently in effect. Additional provisions to be
applied immediately with any development on the Annexation Area, and adopted into
ordinance during 1997.
2. Enforce Stillwater's Restrictive Soils Ordinance and Draft Shoreland Management Ordinance
to protect Oak Woodland areas adjacent to Long Lake and on steep slopes within the
proposed development area.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Restrictive Soils and Shoreland Management Ordinances
Implementation time frame: Soils Ordinance is currently ineffect. Draft Shoreland
Ordinance will be adopted by end of 1997,
e
3. Require developers in the woodland area to complete Forest Management Plans that indicate
areas where development will occur, and identify management strategies to protect and
restore the health and function of oak woodlands where possible, and mitigate for losses that
occur due to development. The Minnesota DNR Forestry Division or certified private
foresters may be consulted for assistance in developing management plans.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, private developers
Regulatory program: Forest Protection Ordinance
Implementation time frame: Complete Forest Management Plans before development
occurs
4. Encourage use of native or "naturalized" landscaping by homeowners in the Annexation
Area, to provide greater stormwater infiltration and more diverse wildlife habitat, and replace
some of the functions provided by the pre-development oak woodland. Plantings should
include canopy trees, understory shrubs, and native grasses and forbs. Encourage developers
to use native plants and naturalized plantings around stormwater ponds in developed areas,
Responsible parties: Homeowners, Developers
Regulatory program: Voluntary program. Developers, Long Lake Homeowners
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
14
Association, Trout Unlimited and others may provide information
demonstrate ideas to residents in the Annexation Area.
Implementation time frame: Ongoing
GoalS:
Identify potential wildlife and recreation corridors, parks and open space
areas, and adopt plans and development strategies for these areas. Include
significant natural community areas in these corridors and open space areas,
and use corridors to create connections between these areas.
Protect,~on strategies:
1. Implement goals and policies of the Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Ordinance
No. 837, and provisions of Resolution 96-242, including goals to complete development of
parks and trails plans for the city, and implementation of these plans through application of
these ordinances as the Annexation Area is developed. This plan should identify remaining
native plant communities, important habitat areas, other natural areas, and corridor linkages
among these, and propose management plans for these areas, including trails and recreation
areas where these are appropriate without compromising the quality of significant native
communities and habitats. The City should work with the DNR Division of Wildlife and
others as appropriate to design and implement an effective corridor system.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Special Area Plans, Subdivision
Ordinance, and Resolution 96-242, Development Agreements, Washington County
Comprehensive Plan.
Implementation time frame: Ordinances are currently in effect. Parks and trails are
identified and mapped in the Comprehensive Plan. Detailed design plans and
implementation will occur with development of the Annexation Area.
2. Coordinate activities to identify natural areas, wildlife corridors and recreation corridors with
greenway corridor planning at the Minnesota DNR, Land Stewardship Project, and
Washington County. The Washington County Linear Park Master Plan includes a trail
segment along CSAH 15 in the Annexation Area. The City should plan for an offroad trail
through this area that would connect with other future trail segments along CR 15 going north
and south.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DNR, Land Stewardship Project, and Washington
County
Regulatory program: Voluntary coordination activities
Implementation time frame: Corridor planning activities are ongoing
3. Map significant natural areas, woodland communities, corridor areas, etc. in the City's
Geographic Information System. Use development reviews to provide information and
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan 5/6/97
direction to developers to use clustering, open space dedication, development design, and
other methods to protect these areas.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: City Comprehensive Plan, Special Area Plans, and Subdivision
Ordinance
Implementation time frame: As development occurs
"I
15
.
.
.
.
.
I.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
16
5/6/97
4.0 Long Lake, McKusick Lake, South Twin Lake, and St. Croix River
These lakes are all located within, or receive direct drainage from, the Annexation Area. The
DNR classifies South Twin and Long Lake as winter kill lakes, while McKusick Lake is
classified as a waterfowl lake, and is too shallow to support game fish populations. South Twin
Lake is located in the Silver Creek Watershed.
Long Lake outlets to Brown's Creek, and is currently experiencing water quantity and quality
problems related to runoff from its drainage area. Most of these problems are generated outside
the Ann~xation Area. The outlet at the north end of the lake is governed by a DNR permit that
restricts flow from May to September, to prevent the flow of warm water to Brown's Creek.
However, the outlet currently flows year-round, in violation of the permit, to prevent flooding of
homes near the lake. Analysis of impacts of development in the Annexation Area indicates that
this development will have little noticeable impact on the water quality and quantity status of
Long Lake.
The City of Stillwater has proposed goals and strategies in this section to alleviate current
flooding problems on Long Lake, while maintaining or improving the water quality of Long
Lake, McKusick Lake and the St. Croix River as the Annexation Area develops. The section
also proposes adoption of stormwater management strategies for the area draining to South Twin
Lake.
Goal 6:
Prevent future flooding and protect or improve the water quality of Long Lake.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Replace the current outlet structure on Long Lake with a new structure that maintains a
normal lake level of 889-890.0 feet, and diverts flows above this level through the current
tributary channel to McKusick Lake.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: DNR Waters Permit No. 76-6047
Implementation time frame: Preliminary study of outlet replacement and diversion
completed during AUAR. Construction feasibility to be completed as the AUAR is
completed (August, 1997).
2. Evaluate methods for improving water quality in Long Lake, including outlet improvements,
removal of sediments collected at the south end of the Long Lake, planting native aquatic
vegetation, and others. Use native vegetation when possible to aid in cleaning sediments and
nutrients from lake water, and to improve fish and wildlife habitat. Consider remedial plans
for developed areas draining to Long Lake to improve water quality, that address
modifications to the current system.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
17
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Long Lake homeowners
Cooperating organizations: Browns Creek WMO, Minnesota DNR
Regulatory program: Browns Creek WMO Plan, Stillwater Subdivision and Environmental
Ordinances, Special Area Plans and Voluntary Actions
Implementation time frame: Ongoing. Improvement strategies could be incorporated into
the "second generation" WMO plan due for completion in June, 2000
.
3. Work with neighboring jurisdictions upstream from Long Lake and the Annexation Area, to
ensure that proper safeguard are implemented to protect the quality of Long Lake and other
surface waters.
,.,
Respnsible parties: Local governments in the Long Lake watershed area
Cooperating organizations: Browns Creek WMO
Regulatory program: City ordinances and subdivision regulations. Browns Creek WMO
Plan provides for review and comment.
Implementation time frame: Ongoing
4. Complete integrated water quality management plans for lakes in the Annexation Area.
Responsible parties: Browns Creek WMO
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Implement when permanent management has been
determined for WMO, or as resources for plans become available. Improvement strategies
could be included in the "second generation" WMO plan, due for completion in June, 2000.
.
5. Consider establishment of adequate public access to Long Lake, as this may increase
eligibility for funding sources to improve water quality.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Voluntary determination
Implementation time frame: Consider in 1997 along with regulations for surface water use
of Long Lake.
Goal 7:
Assure that solutions to Long Lake high water problems do not degrade the
water quality of McKusick Lake, Brown's Creek or the St. Croix River.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement the diversion strategy from Long Lake to McKusick Lake described in 2.0, Goal
1, No.1. Allow sediment from Long Lake and the Annexation Area to settle in the wetlands
north of McKusick Lake.
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
18
5/6/97
Regulatory parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: DNR Outlet Permit, Wetland Conservation Act
Implementation time frame: City will complete construction feasibility study by August,
1997, and implement the diversion based on results of the study.
2. Require the use, management, and enforcement of Best Management Practices (BMP's) and
wet stormwater detention basins to control erosion and sedimentation during and after
construction of projects in the Annexation Area, to prevent sedimentation to Brown's Creek,
the St. Croix River, and other resources.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: MPCA
Regulatory program: Stormwater Management Ordinance, NPDES Permit Program,
Development Agreements
Implementation time frame: Immediate
3. Continue water quality monitoring on Long Lake. If declines in water quality are noted as the
Annexation Area develops, initiate more detailed lake studies through the University of
Minnesota or other research organization to determine factors contributing to the decline.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Volunteer lake monitors, Browns Creek WMO
Regulatory program: Shoreland Management Ordinance, Planning Commission and Parks
Board Policies
Implementation time frame: May be implemented immediately.
4. Encourage lakeshore residents to maintain or restore a buffer of native vegetation to reduce
erosion and provide wildlife habitat.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Lakeshore landowners
Regulatory program: Draft Shoreland Management Ordinance (Feb., 1997) and
voluntary actions of current landowners
Implementation time frame: May be implemented immediately
5. Consider a City ordinance limiting the use of lawn fertilizers containing phosphorus, and
educate residents about yard care practices to protect surface water quality.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, Long Lake Homeowners Association
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Ongoing
Stillwater AUAR Miti!?ation PLan
5/6/97
19
Goal 8:
Protect the water quality of South Twin Lake.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement the Stormwater Management Study for the Annexation Area developed as a part
of the AUAR, including recommendations for the area north of the Minnesota Zephyr
railroad tracks that drains to South Twin Lake. This study sets forth recommendations for the
design and performance of stormwater detention basins to reduce peak flows and protect
water quality in South Twin Lake.
...
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: City Stormwater Management Ordinance, Minn. Statutes 103B,235
and Minn. Rules 8410
Implementation time frame: Implement as the Annexation Area is developed.
2. Require developers in the Annexation Area that flows to South Twin Lake to infiltrate and
detain stormwater runoff using the methods described in Section 2.0, Goal 1, Strategy 3,
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater, private developers
Regulatory program: Stillwater Comprehensive Plan, Stormwater Management Ordinance,
Special Area Plans, and Development Agreements
Implementation time frame: As development is proposed
3. Adopt the City's proposed Shoreland Management Ordinance, including provisions for
vegetative buffers, fertilizer and lawn care management, and other provisions that protect
lake water quality.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Shoreland Management Ordinance (Draft 2/3/97)
Implementation time frame: Adopt Shoreland Management Ordinance by December, 1997
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitif?ation Plan
5/6/97
20
5.0 Infrastructure
Goal 9: Complete development of infrastructure for the Annexation Area (including
sanitary sewer, water supply, and street systems) that is efficient, economical,
and minimizes or mitigates impacts to the environment.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Complete the feasibility study for sanitary sewer service to be constructed in the Annexation
Area. Identify alternatives that avoid and/or mitigate for impacts to groundwater, wetlands,
nati ve plant communities, and surface water resources.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: MPCA, Minnesota DNR
Regulatory program: Wetland Conservation Act
Implementation time frame: Feasibility study to be completed by September, 1997.
2. Complete field survey to identify shallow groundwater areas and implement
Strategies to avoid these areas or prevent drainage of groundwater near Brown's
Creek and its tributaries, as specified in Goal 2, Strategies 5 &6.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Voluntary program
Implementation time frame: Implement as feasibility study and construction of utilities are
completed in the Annexation Area.
3. Encourage development of streets and roadways to minimize impervious surfaces and route
storm water flows to pervious areas and detention basins, minimize stormwater runoff to
wetlands, creeks and lakes, and provide for recreation and natural corridors that connect
resources and open spaces in the Annexation Area.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington County, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Regulatory program: City Comprehensive Plan, Special Area Plans, Park and Trailway
Plans, Washington County Comprehensive Plan
Implementation time frame: Implement as streets and roads are designed and constructed.
Stillwater AUAR Miti!:ation Plan
5/6/97
21
6.0 Wetlands
.
Wetlands in the annexation area are significant for local hydrology and wildlife habitat. The
National Wetlands Inventory identified 82 wetlands (approximately 287 acres) in the study area.
Wetlands in the Jackson Wildlife Management Area (WMA) north of Long Lake, and north of
McKusick Lake, will be impacted by stormwater management strategies suggested in this
AUAR. Existing, restored or created wetlands may offer opportunities to mitigate the impacts of
urbanization in the Annexation Area, but their function and quality may also be compromised by
development activities. Construction of infrastructure proposed for the Annexation Area may
also imHact wetland resources.
The City of Stillwater administers the Wetland Conservation Act, and is required by law to
regulate wetlands in the City. The City will require strict adherence to the rules of the Wetland
Conservation Act, and require that a sequencing process be followed during the design and
construction of all projects. This process requires that wetland impacts be avoided if possible,
and that unavoidable impacts be compensated through replacement with wetlands that provide
equal functions and values.
The City has also proposed completion of a Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan,
including a functions and values assessment of wetlands in the community, and development of
policies and management strategies to better manage wetlands based on the functions they
perform and value to the community.
.
Goal 1 0:
Achieve the policy of "no-net-Ioss" of wetland functions and values in the
Annexation Area by avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts when feasible,
and mitigating for unavoidable impacts. Wetland management should be
integrated with local water ,planning, be based on an assessment of functions
and values of wetlands in the area, and prioritized based on wetland quality.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Implement existing wetland protection regulations contained in City ordinances, Watershed
Plans, and State and Federal rules.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington SWCD, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota
DNR, MPCA, U.S. EPA
Regulatory program: Stillwater Subdivision Code, Bluffland/Shoreland, Floodplain,
Shoreland Management, and Wetland Conservation Ordinances, Wetland Conservation Act,
Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act, Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Program,
Browns Creek Watershed Management Plan
Implementation time frame: Ordinances and regulations are currently in effect
.
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR MitiKation Plan
22
5/6/97
2. Complete a Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan for the Annexation Area and the City
of Stillwater that meets the requirements of the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR)
for such plans, including completion of a functions and values assessment for all wetlands in
the community, development of a wetlands classification system, policies, and management
recommendations based on this assessment.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Minn. Statutes 103G.2242
ImHlementation time frame: The City will apply for BWSR grant to complete a
Comprehensive Wetlands Management Plan in 1998.
3. Wetland mitigation or replacement that results from development activity in the Annexation
Area should be implemented within the Brown's Creek Watershed (avoid use of Mitigation
Banks outside the Watershed).
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: BWSR, MPCA
Regulatory program: Wetland Mitigation Act
Implementation time frame: As development occurs
Goal 11 :
Protect and maintain the quality of surface water flows to wetlands.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Require the use, management, and enforcement of Best Management Practices (EMP's) and
_ wet stormwater detention basins to control erosion and sedi~entation by providing
pretreatment of water discharged to wetlands during and after construction.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations:, Washington SWCD, MPCA
Regulatory program: Stillwater Stormwater Management Ordinance, NPDES Stormwater
Management Program, Browns Creek Watershed Management Plan
Implementation time frame: Ordinance is currently in effect
2. Promote the maintenance of natural buffer zones of at least 50 feet in width along the
boundary of wetlands to protect water quality and wildlife habitat as an interim measure until
a Comprehensive Wetland Management Plan for the City is completed. Develop and adopt
permanent buffer zone recommendations as a part of the Comprehensive Wetland
Management Plan.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: Stillwater Subdivision and Shoreland Ordinance
Implementation time frame: Existing ordinance
Stillwater AUAR Miti[?ation Plan
5/6/97
23
7.0 Historical and Archaeological Resources
.
Cultural resources inventory information provided by the Minnesota Historical Society indicated
the presence of areas of high and moderate archaeological potential in the Annexation Area.
These areas include the Stone Bridge site on Brown's Creek.
The City of Stillwater will work with developers to identify historical, archaeological, and
architectural resources in areas with high and moderate archaeological potential, and to preserve
these resources to the extent practicable.
">
Goal 12:
Identify and preserve historical and archaeological resources in the
Annexation Area.
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Stormwater management strategies described in Section 1.0 Browns Creek and its Tributaries
will aid in protecting the Stone Bridge from additional storm water runoff generated by new
development that could degrade the bridge or affect its structure. These strategies include
diversion of runoff from most storm events away from Brown's Creek, and reduction of
storm flows in other events through ponding and infiltration in upstream areas.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Listed in Section 1.0
Regulatory program: Listed in Section 1.0
Implementation time frame: Described in Section 1.0
.
2. Require developers or the City of Stillwater to conduct Phase I archaeological surveys in
areas that will be disturbed in the development process, and that have high or moderate
archaeological potential, as identified by the Minnesota Historical Society. The surveys
should address identification issues related to archaelogical sites and standing structures.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Private developers and State Historic Preservation Office
Regulatory program: Minnesota Environmental Policy Act; Stillwater Subdivision
Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan, SHPO Regulations
Implementation time frame: Before development in areas identified.
.1
.
.
.
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
24
8.0 Other Development Related Issues
Urban development in the Annexation Area will impact a variety of other concerns, such as
traffic, noise, and air quality. The City of Stillwater will seek to minimize impacts in these areas
as appropriate to protect the health, welfare and safety of the public.
Goal 13:
Manage Automobile Traffic to Safely Accommodate Development Planned
for the Annexation Area
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Design and construct roads in the Annexation Area to mitigate traffic impacts while meeting
natural resource protection goals and strategies included in this Plan.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Minnesota DOT
Regulatory program: Regulatory and construction programs of these agencies
Implementation time frame: Review and design projects as development
occurs in the Annexation Area.
2. Implement Washington County's Linear Park System Plan, and Stillwater's Parks and Trails
Plans as roads are developed in the Annexation Area,
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington County
Regulatory program: Washington County Comprehensive Plan and City
of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan
Implementation time frame: Implement as development occurs in the
Annexation Area
Goal 14:
Maintain Air Quality in the Annexation Area as Development Occurs
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Enforce State Air Quality Standards to regulate air emissions in the Annexation Area.
Responsible parties: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Regulatory program: Indirect Source Permit Program
Implementation time frame: Regulations are currently in effect
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan
5/6/97
25
2. Implement Best Management Practices to minimize dust during and after construction of
developments and infrastructure in the Annexation Area.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington County, Minnesota DOT
Regulatory program: Stillwater Subdivision Code and Contractor Oversight
Implementation time frame: Regulations are currently in effect
Goal 15: Minimize Noise Generated by Construction and Traffic in the Annexation Area
...
PROTECTION STRATEGIES:
1. Regulate hours when construction may occur to control construction noise.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: City Ordinance
Implementation time frame: Ordinance is currently in effect
2. Construct noise berms where needed to control noise associated with road construction and
traffic.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Cooperating organizations: Washington County, Minnesota DOT
Regulatory program: Part of road design and construction activities
Implementation time frame: Ongoing
3. Locate less noise-sensitive land uses adjacent to major roads.
Responsible parties: City of Stillwater
Regulatory program: City Comprehensive Plan
Implementation time frame: Plan is currently in effect
e
e
ei
.
.
Ie
Stillwater AUAR Mitigation Plan 5/6/97
26
ADOPTED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
PLANS AND REGULATIONS
The City of Stillwater has a variety of plans, ordinances, and regulations in place that address
environmental issues in the Annexation Area. These mechanisms will be enforced and
amended as indicated in the Mitigation Plan to provide a comprehensive framework and set
of tools to protect the natural resources of the Annexation Area as development occurs:
City of Stillwater Comprehensive Plan (1995)
'>
Stillwater Subdivision Code (1997)
Special Area Plans (Chapter 13. Comprehensive Plan - 1995)
Grading Permits Ordinance (1988)
Stormwater Management Ordinance #776 (1993)
Restrictive Soils Ordinance #778 (1993)
Floodway Ordinance #747 (1993)
Forest Protection Ordinance #769 (1993)
Current Shoreland Management Ordinance #784
Draft Shoreland Management Ordinance (1997)
Subdivision Ordinance #837
Park and Trailway Resolution 96-242
Stormwater Utility
Wetland Conservation Act
Development Process - Enforcement of Regulations and Best Management Practices
.
...
IV TEXT CHANGE
-
.
.
.
.
.
13. Water Use
a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? X Yes_
No
Development of the project area would require the installation of an additional
municipal well and a water tower. The location is still tentative but would likely be
about one-half mile east of the intersection of County Highways 15 and 12 in
section 30.
...
Development of the project area would likely involve the abandonment and
permanent sealing of several water supply wells used for domestic purposes.
Development may also result in the abandonment and permanent sealing of a
number of monitoring wells. A list of the wells located within the project area is
included as part ofTable 1. The Minnesota Geological survey's County Well
Index indicates that most of these wells are to be domestic wells.
With respect to band c, below, if the area requires neW water supply wells, specillc
information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels
should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other
resources should be addressed.
b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water Oncluding
dewatering)? X Yes _ No
If yes, indicate the source, quantity, duration, purpose of the appropriation. and
DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. DiscusS
the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels.
Development of the project area will require an appropriation of groundwater,
chiefly for municipal water supply. The source of the supply wili be a well
completed in the Prairie du Chienf Jordan Aquifer system, with construction and
completion similar to the other municipal supply wells for the City of Stillwater.
The new well will be Stiliwatefs 7th well, and the City anticipates yields on the
order of 1000 gpm. The City of Stillwatefs existing appropriation permit number
is 756207. While the neW well's yield is expected to be close to 1000 gpm, its
use may not be constant, so the average daily discharge may be conslderabiy
less.
Groundwater withdrawals are a concern because of the potential for affecting the
dynamics of groundwater discharge to the Brown's Creek system. This stream is
designated as a trout stream by the DNR, and its viability as trout habitat is largeiy
sustained by groundwater discharges. Accordingiy, the development of additional
municipal wells near Stiliwater must take into account reasonable expectations of
impacts on the Brown's Creek..
A screening-level analysis was prepared to predict the effects of pumping a single
municipal production well in an aquifer system with properties comparable to the
Prairie du Chien/Jordan in the Stillwater area. This analysis made the following
assumptions:
~ Theis solution for flow to a pumping well is appropriate for making the
predictions;
~ Prairie du Chien/Jordan aquifer system is hydraulically continuous
laterally;
~ Hydraulic parameters reflect the fact that portions of the aquifer are
unconfined.
~ Transient analysis conducted for time = 7 days
~ Transmissivity = 14500 If/day (value from City of Oak Park Heights
pumping test)
~ Storativity = 0.0125 (value from City of Oak Park Heights pumping test)
.
'.
The calculations using the assumptions and input parameters presented above
are shown in Appendix C. The results show that the radial distance (zone of
influence) is approximately 4570 feet. This result is presented on Figure 13-1,
which shows the areas around Brown's Creek within which municipal well
pumping on the scale proposed would have the potential to impact groundwater
discharge to Brown's Creek. It is important to note that while the hydraulic
parameters are representative and reasonable for local conditions, the pumping
rate and duration of pumping are likely conservative mainly because it would be
rare for the well to be used 24 hours a day, without short periods of downtime.
This adds a margin of safety to the results presented in Figure 13-1.
c.
Will the project require connection to a public water supply?
.
~ Yes No
If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the
supply, and the quantity to be used.
Stillwater's primary source of groundwater for municipal water supply is the
Prairie du Chien/Jordan Aquifer system. The DNR water appropriation permit
number for the supply is 756207. A new well will be expected to supply 1000
gpm on a short-term basis.
.
.
.
.
13. Water Use
a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? X Yes_
No
Development of the project area would require the installation of an additional
municipal well and a water tower. The location is still tentative but would likely be
about one-half mile east of the intersection of County Highways 15 and 12 in
section 30.
~,
Development of the project area would likely involve the abandonment and
permanent sealing of several water supply wells used for domestic purposes.
Development may also result in the abandonment and permanent sealing of a
number of monitoring wells. A list of the wells located within the project area is
included as part of Table 1. The Minnesota Geological Survey's County Well
Index indicates that most of these wells are to be domestic wells.
With respect to band c, below, if the area requires new water supply wells, specific
information about that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels
should be given; if groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other
resources should be addressed.
b.
Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (including
dewatering)? X Yes _ No
If yes, indicate the source, quantity, duration, purpose of the appropriation, and
DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. Discuss
the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels.
Development of the project area will require an appropriation of groundwater,
chiefly for municipal water supply. The source of the supply will be a well
completed in the Prairie du Chien! Jordan Aquifer system, with construction and
completion similar to the other municipal supply wells for the City of Stillwater.
The new well will be Stillwater's 7th well, and the City anticipates yields on the
order of 1000 gpm. The City of Stillwater's existing appropriation permit number is
756207. While the new well's yield is expected to be close to 1000 gpm, its use
may not be constant, so the average daily discharge may be considerably less.
Groundwater withdrawals are a concern because of the potential for affecting the
dynamics of groundwater discharge to the Brown's Creek system. This stream is
designated as a trout stream by the DNR, and its viability as trout habitat is largely
sustained by groundwater discharges. Accordingly, the development of additional
municipal wells near Stillwater must take into account reasonable expectations of
impacts on the Brown's Creek.
A screening-level analysis was prepared to predict the effects of pumping a single
municipal production well in an aquifer system with properties comparable to the
Prairie du Chien!Jordan in the Stillwater area. This analysis made the following
assumptions:
..
. \ 4~ ... 'or "OW to a puroping well is appropriate lor ma\<.ing the
'The\S sO U~\OI' , "
predictions.,. ordan aquiler svstem is h)"lraulical\'i continUOUs lateralty;
pra.ne ~u Ch.enlJ " ct the lact that portions 01 the aqu.lef are .
HydraubC pararoeters re"e
unconfined. . d led lor tiroe " 7 da1s
'Transie~t. ~n~\y:\s'\4C~~0 ~/day (vaiue Iroro City 01 oa\<. pari< Heights
'Transro\SSN\tj -
puroPi~~ tes\)o 0'\25 Ivalue lrom City 01 oa\<. pari< Heights pumping test)
.. stora\\,oI\tj:::'. \
. s and input parameters presented abO"e
"The calcUlations using the ~~uroP~~~ shoW that the radial distance (zone 01
are shawn in I'ppendIX-.I 4~7:;'~eet "This result is presented on figure 13-1,
influence) is approXlmate~ o..m's cree\<. within which municipal well
which shoWS the areas around :' ld nave the potential to impact groundwater
puroping on the sca~e propose .",,?u ortent to note that while the hydrauliC .
discharge to BroWO s cre~~ : ~n':';'asonable lor local conditions, thO pumpIng
pararoeters ar~ represen ~ IV are Ii\<.ei conservative mainlY because it would be
rate and durat\on oi puroP\ng4 "'" y d""Y ...thout short neriods 01 downtlroe.
\\ to be used 2 ..ours a" n r
rare {or the we . t t ty to the results presented in figure 13-1.
'This adds a roarg\n 0' sale
Will the project require connection to a publiC water supplY?
~ Yes_No
.. I the DNR water appropriation permit number of tho
If yes Identity the supP y,
supP~' and the quanflty to be used. .
. I roundwater lor municipal water suppl1'A
StiljWatdS pnma<'J s~tce 0 t g m "The D"R water appropriation perm,
dU ChienlJordan MUI er sys e . \\ will be expected to suppl11000 gpro
the supp\'i is 756207. I' neW we
shor\~terrn basis.
..
..
..
..
...
c.
.'
.
estillwater AUAR - Calculation of Municipal Well Effects
Governing Equation: (Theis equalion) ~ ~ f ~ L
,.
iJr~,.JJt:Jw~ Q \;1C......)
-
-
4frT
wl~ r'l.5
,u...::. ~Tt
Input Parameters:
Transmissivity (T) 14438 ft2/day
pi = '\ 3.14159
Pumping Rate (Q) 1000 gpm
Storativity (S) 1.250E-02
Time (t) 7 days
Results
log (r) r u W(u) s
(feet)
2 100 0.000309 7.504603 7.962915
2.47712125472 300 0.002783 5.30985 5.634127
. 3 1000 0.03092 2.929807 3.108732
3.30102999566 2000 0.123682 1.632789 1 .732505
Distance Drawdown Plot
City of Stillwater -- AUAR
10
I
I
I
i
~ I
I
I
I
~'" I
I
I
~ I
I
~ !
i
~ r = L{ ~i (!.t I
I
"'/ I I
::;:;- 8
==-
c:
?;
o
j 6
co
o
-g 4
'5
c.
E
o
U 2
I.
o
1
2
3 4
Log (radial distance (ft))
5
6
, -., .
.
'.
"'~
I
I
I
\
I
!
, 0 c
o
'-II
Legend
N Proposed pten A
N A1tlfnete PkIn 8
Exi,ting Pip",
. UII Slallon
1\/ Brown', Creek
m lake'
N
+
2500 Feet jrl. Boncstroo
L..II Rosene
.-:w AncJerJlk &
1\11 Associates
Engint"l:!'r.. & AnhitecU
k.\51 0151 002~nterccl
2500
o
Stillwater Auar Annexation Area
Sanitary Service Expansion
.
'"
~
.
.. :1 ,"'1. y (!.
j 't !t.' . \. .~ ," . I' ~ ';
. . l... . .' . ~ ~ .
,..... .." , .'" !
~ '"
~--. . ",." .._I t
~ I " ,...... .
n.;: . ,"t ,'. . I..
;-J ~. :
~~. .1' I
I~ . '
:"",,/ ' \
cq,':.! --d - f
\ g tJ&
\ t::....~
'f:
\.
':
'. +-
,
,
.............~
...,
'~
~.....:,
"'f'"'1'+fi"''P '\
... i
t......
,')U
.'r~~i.~-:..
.......: _._~._..u .._...
....t-.
......~,.('ol,,+...,..._-___........_ _
.--_.........
...::j'.\)
< I
.." ....;.~
~...,
'(:
;.':.-:'=.:;';;:c:.:;"",
., ~...
)
....r';:,:;
'ij ..'
",.,.~ .
./' '
..".7-.,,'.../.:.:..... i
, {; "
, -"'- .
~~:. . -."~,,- ..
i ,::.'~
f" .'
."t""'........ .!""'''',
',. ! t..
k
:j
t
....,..
c
E\I'L\"\II(J\
\\ Jh..'r 1.lhk; .1\1111 :'~~
I _'I[ llll< ,11. 'f": ,: '. h."l\..' '.~ ,liS IJhL: ll,-~':,. if I ~~I.h..l.tl Ill.!l '[ I,ll ,
tl::1 ~" lit \1 r,:.1( III y U~ll1 -li:1' '. ;11.:r
-3,'.____
\'.,II'.:r utlk ,-IIIE' if
Illlt':I'(".' :\:,111 ''':~I 1<:'.,'1. . 'I:! :.J:ll(...;l'..d "II 1;,.','1
~
~",
)- .'
.'
l
\
'\ "
...... \;'.
~~" '.)
": n
, y.;
, .':'o..1tf
''''. iJf-_~ ./....:;~L~-':.~' "
.,- (.__.:...,..,-~.
"
-c,. ,,"
~.,
t::~.
l:"", :
i 'j
i'
I (~~
\
,<
!
.
~w'
,
\ 'T:i:::2:,
'.':c....., . ...:~f:,'):J......\.:\... t
,...;,..\:;:' .\ \
", .: :"~'-:~{1 -'Jth.].-":: \\..~".S(~*'\.. , .... '.
~"'7"-"!'-~-~ .L:_i..:.:.,.... .,.; , ""1 ~.\dU~~-.I',~
. ~ I' ~"" \.,', J '...'
-"-'~~~l _\~iftfD\'\'~ 'N;":~~;':~:
. T).tr~:;< :f<:P:.:<:;:.'ri, ',~\~y ;~"~\' ,
.. . r'-;""~'.';":-. hi .1.'-1'1 '~
:...'\......j. i; ! ~ I .L.. "
It !,. ,,' '.. !::.t\r:-:"'-~ \. i' 1 If' . '.
t,!o.,'; t. ~ .n"i T:T! \'\ .\
,,:! 1<' ":nlpl' ;'1: 1:\ \ .
1.<1",'(' ! .....~ 1:'\ .' i ,..' ,', -<
. .'r- ", ;....fi. .~..;.:;.:~r..::~~ \.\\'\ ~'. .. .
I , .. ',' T......''''..\ \'" ... ./ ".
,.... I. )~,..., }..~>~~..:4:-.~:~.. i:h __ "l~ .I',
,;.1 hjiJ j'!f;\."./ ....~::j, j .t{'i:~'l.~' ".\"1'(\,\'
""T .+1.:1 ,~+lG:; . ,}~lt~\......~.~~' ""'..
I 'I 1': "~\., ...,~. ....,\. t-:"
!,. .. ~"'.f" . ".~..',...' " '" > ".... J' '.
i'~ , I ();~~. '\l-l:'k;.~'\.Z\:,. . t .,.... 't" i><..
i ;\.... I. ~d. ht~~+:\,:.....\\t\:II.~~;t>li.;.i "". ."
.... :1 ,--.. r-,~.',':-:i!. ',.. '};"\\~.} ;:'.,:....,.~\ ("J\
1 ~"i~N~~t~.:, .~T,;J::'k.j\.\~..{~~<"":'~.. '''\ ~, \
l . . .. t. '1~" : (.':~:'. :..~) :: ~ -\ .' \"""" .:.,,\! , '
" ""I(Ji;,;.r!.~.: .L'} ......A.. '''\. \' '.\ :>\
i'.; ; , f;" "'\. \\ ". \\ ': \ 'f \
i ~" ......'~...\'."'.;
. ..1 ..." ,,,V,':l '" \': \.., :: i
/
(;":111.:1.11 ,hh.:llhlll III :~rll'tlld "..11':1 1111 ".-:lIll'lIt
~1"llll"l '\vll
.;.,1.\ II LII
'''8 11:1:;: ~';l:cl
I" 'h:llll.11 :. I~'I,I . .dll'~ .
\\ 11.:10..: .1\.111.:1>1.', III '_'.:11.,;". {'11;l1I1I:1,'
Source Washington County Geologic Atlas
Q.ti"~~9-t~r~,
. l' ,_ 1M" .., 1 ~ , ., . .. ~.
Stillwater AUAR Annexation Area
Groundwater Contours
+
~ Bonestroo
~ Rosene
'1\11 Andcrlik &
1\J' Associates
rmJif1\.'~f ~ ,~ Ar<hit\.;Cb
Table 12-6
Summary of Wetland Impacts
Wetland ID # Existing Wetland Wetland Mean Existing Conditions Future Conditions Predicted Wetland
Community Type Area Wetland Community Type
(Ac) Elevation High Water Maximum Duration of High Water Ma)[imum Duration of
(Ft) Elevation Bounce Inundation Elevation Bounce Inundation
(Ft) (Ft) (Days) (Ft) (Ft) (Days)
I Sedge Meadow 6.9 851.0 851.4 0.4 1.5 853.5 2.5 10.9 Mixed Emergent marsh
2 Sedge Meadow 1.1 851.5 851.4 0.1 1.5 853.5 2.0 10.9 Mixed Emergent Marsh
3 Mixed Emergent 15.3 851.3 851.4 0.2 1.5 853.5 2.2 10.9 Mixed Emergent Marsh
Marsh
4 Shrub Swamp 6.5 855.5 851.4 0 1.5 853.5 0 0 Shrub Swamp
5 Wet Meadow 19.7 853.2 851.4 0 1.5 853.5 0.3 4.8 Wet Meadow
6 Shrub Swamp 7.8 855.0 851.4 0 1.5 853.5 0 0 Shrub Swamp
7 Minerotrophic 1.6 855.5 851.4 0 1.5 853.5 0 0 Shrub Swamp
Tamarack
8 Mixed Emergent 6.1 85\.0 851.4 0.4 \.5 853.5 2.5 10.9 Mixed Emergent Marsh
Marsh
9 Wet Meadow 3.5 866.0 867.7 1.7 1.2 871.2 5.2 4.6 Wet Meadow
10 Shrub Swamp 5.6 868.5 867.7 0 1.2 871.2 2.7 1.7 Shrub Swamp
11 Open 17.6 *890.2 891.2 1.0 16.2 890.9 0.7 2.9 Open Water/Emergent Marsh
WaterlEmergent
Marsh
* Elevation at waterline of weIland
Assumes a 3" rainfall for a 3 year relurn frequency in a 24 hour period.
Assumptions made for McKusick Lake wetlands
Assumes a baseOow of 2 cfs allowed to pass into Brown's Creek from diversion poin!.
The entire runoff from a 3" rainfall will be retained within the expanded McKusick Lake basin with diversion of flow from Long Lake tributary system to McKusick Lake through a 42" pipe.
The entire proposed watershed for McKusick Lake is approximately 4,870 acres (7.61 square miles).
Approximately 3.600 acres (5.61 square miles) is proposed to be diverted to McKusick Lnke.
Low point of McKusick Rond near Amundson Drive is 854.92' (CB elevntion) with embankment clcvntion of 856'.
Assumptions made for diversion pond to McKusick Lake
storm events greater than the modeled 3.year storm event overflow into Brown's Creek
Assumptions made for Jackson WMA (ExistingCondition)
The existing oUllet structure at CSAH 12 is the governing outlet for the wetlands and Long Lake.
The two 30' CMP culverts connecting Long Lake to the wellands act as equalizers because of their greater capacity.
The current oullet structures for Long Lake and the wellands (CSAH 12) cause the basins to act as one hydraulic system during storm events.
.
.
.
..~.... "
.
.
.
'\ . ,Il' .,
..
-- ; ll~=---,...::::=-~::~_J ". _.._ ' ! .. . _ ,,'. ::-- - ... . 11 -
I :.: /l"::'~Q.---- <~~
,. ~.-<~' ~-
t I '."",/ ~i7:/'" .........11 .
. ...., ~ .
./."': ~., ',I j' ."J' .;~y. c (:
r, .~__t'1f '--"~".. ....-. ........0. ; r ':::'t '\. _~ .~:...,:, -
'. . '. .' f:i {;t-. C . ~ ~,.. ./. · . ',c" t' .
'~\., ',.' .'!;:" . .....;~~::::-~ ': '._ C' .
'. "\ ,"I"r p.-.o',' Y
Ot>. -=-.; G, -\t\iifl' I ~" , /.'i1: . C' .
-':: . dr ! (: . -l;j.' c./ . .. :/$....,. .
.AmOx1~'Wa>~.- -d; ~.. ,/,ief-o..,,-.-.<cc"'-"<
T() f312QWWS ~ . . '.~ .' " '. " r"'f.<- c:
{OtJFWt;:t--lCE .. . .~. ~'XQ c c. .
( .~ ,.~. '--~/~;;/" )>~:, ,~!'\..."". '. .
. IV" ... 7~ t."' 0 .... .~ 0:': .. .... ..... .. . -
.' ~ '/ ' C . C, 'Ill'" e
. /~: ~, . . ~ .~o y' :::-- .jJ; . . . . . .... ':. _ ...,_ ~ t,';;"" . ~
~-~ ,~..'~: .;,:., ~ , " 1 (.,. ro-' f):... .~(~'-.' . '.,:-:'. <{.;.7~~~? -./'..( 0~
t':,..........'., o:'/~~~.j~;,%J:f~dld~'~:: \.\~tj~:J5-~~fi~~~~<=:r\7~1~t:.'~~K~. ..t~1D..ik6 6~' 0~ -'l'ii':~
c~ VL--" .1!~ 'j" " 'l;i . . it \ Ui~'. !' ,,' ~~j.. " 'h
· ;.i! ~~! '.'.~ \ - · -t\l~\.'f'''''' ~'\'\ 1;:1 \ \~" I'., '~; :,1.:.:..... r:"OJ Ji
~'///. <'" h.0;'?' .... ',I {~.;\ . I . " \ ,\ \ \ I \ ~, ~ ,.IX. ! ii .~,. i l :R ~- ~-' 0 'J
IfJ . i.: .~
'll tl.-
~it
--
<:.
r';' n t.
l' f....
ji6'
6ft/) Hr.';
I
.'~ '."
j'
~. ",
~-;~
1;'
~.'''~.
. ~. ~
I.
fUlJ1.
.~/~~
..z
STILLWATER AUAR
ANNEXATION AREA
FIGURE 12-5
Jl1I Bonf1Stroo
Rosene
a And8rllk &
'\J' Associates
~..~
MCKUSICK LAKE DIVERSION STRUCTURE
.
.
.
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Shawn Sanders ~. S
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
Croixwood Boulevard Street Rehabilitation
Job No. 9724
DISCUSSION:
Plans and specifications for the Croixwood Boulevard Street Rehabilitation
project are near completion. If Council orders the project following the public hearing on
Tuesday, plans and specifications can be approved. Authorization to advertise for bids
was given at the July 151 meeting. Bids would be opened on August 5th and brought to
Council for award at that evening's Council meeting. Completion for the project would
be September 191h.
RECOMMENDATION:
If Council decides to proceed with the project after the public hearing, I
recommend that Council approve the plans and specifications for Croixwood Boulevard
Street Rehabilitation Project.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting
Resolution No. 97-_, APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR CROIXWOOD BOULEVARD
STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT (JOB NO. 9724)
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR CROIXWOOD BOULEVARD STREET
REHABILITATION PROJECT (JOB NO. 9724)
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on July 15, 1997, the
City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Croixwood
Boulevard from County Road 5 to Northland Boulevard and has presented such plans and
specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications are hereby approved.
2.
The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in The Gazette and in the
Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published three weeks prior to the opening of bids, shall specify the work
to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until Tuesday,
August 5, 1997 at I 0:00 a.m. at which time they will be publicly opened at City
Hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered
by the Council on August 5, 1997, in the Stillwater Library. Any bidder whose
responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the Clerk for ten
(10) percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by Council this 15th day of July, 1997
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
.
.
.
I.
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles }L~ /
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Hazel Street Ravine Erosion Problem
Job No. 9609
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a letter from Nancy Percell who lives on Hazel Court. As she points out in
her letter and based on staff observations, the Hazel Street Ravine has badly eroded in the past
two storm events. Given that we are not proceeding with the Johnson CourtlStonebridge Trail
storm sewer extension, some money is available to proceed with this project. Council may wish
to consider beginning the 429 assessment process by ordering a public hearing on the feasibility
report.
There is an alternative process. Since the 429 process takes a significant amount of time
to complete and since additional failure would have grave implications, Council could declare
this an emergency. This would allow City staff to forego the 429 process and proceed under
emergency procedures. We could then proceed in a similar fashion as was done on the Brick
Pond Project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council consider the situation and weigh the liability issues along
with the financial implications in choosing whether to use the 429 assessment process to proceed
with the project versus declaring an emergency.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council deems it necessary to declare an emergency, Council should pass a motion
adopting a resolution declaring an emergency and directing staff to proceed with emergency
repairs using day labor contractor services and city resources as necessary.
If Council chooses to proceed with the 429 process, Council should pass a motion
adopting a resolution calling for hearing on the Hazel Street Ravine improvement.
Nancy V. Purcell
July 10, 1997
Mr.. C1ayton Eckles
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th St.
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear Mr. Eckles: ..
Apropos of our conversation this afternoon, I hope the Hazel St. ravine project can be
scheduled for this summer. The slope just west of 5th street is in very poor condition.
Heavy rains this spring caused further erosion and we lost a couple more trees which
really jeopardized this very fragile slope. The edge of the ravine is now within a foot of
the roadway.
Could we schedule an appointment to walk the ravine? I am concerned not only that
we shore up and prevent further damage to the existing slope but that the ravine bed
itself be enhanced not degraded in the process.
Thank you very much. I look forward to meeting with you.
S ncerely,
4~
N ncy V. Purcell
.
.
.
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
City Coordinator
Sl$J.ECT:
Garbage and Sewer Ordinances
DATE:
July 11, 1997
Discussion:
The ordinances regulating garbage and sewer charges lacks specificity regarding certain types of
adjustments for the related charges. For example, residences are often converted from multi-family
to lesser units (e.g., from a duplex to a single family home). The owner usually requests an
adjustment be made to his billing. If the change takes place at the beginning (or at the end) of a
quarter this is not a problem because we are usually making changes to the accounts anyway.
However, if the change takes place during a quarter then an additional change has to be made and
it creates more work for Finance. Further, the policy has been to not make changes unless the city
(usually thru the Building Inspection department) can verify that the conversion actually took place
and on the date the owner claims it took place. This situation also applies to the sewer bill which is
billed on a quarterly basis like garbage.
As I stated previously, the present ordinances do not specifically address adjustments to accounts
for conversions. Staff would request that the ordinance be amended accordingly by adding the
appropriate language. I can discuss this further with you at the meeting.
Recommendation:
Council have first reading of Ordinance amending Chapter's 29 (Sewer Service Charges) and 30
(Garbage and rubbish). ...
11~
.
.
.
CITY OF STILL WATER
Memorandum
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
Date:
July 11, 1997
Subject:
~ ..,
Amending City Code, Sale of Tobacco Products
Recent legislative changes require the amendment of our current ordinance to comply with the
standards imposed by the new law. The City Attorney will provide further information at
Tuesday's meeting.
I
.
.
.
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles
City Engineer
K-11.- V'"
SUBJECT: Aiple Property
Phase I Environmental Study
..,
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a proposal from Service Environmental Engineering Corporation for the
preparation of Phase I Environmental Study for the Aiple's property. Service Environmental
Engineering will perform these services for a lump sum fee of$I,600.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council accept the proposal and enter into a general agreement
with Service Environmental Engineering Corporation for the preparation of a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment for the Aiple's property.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the recommendation they should pass a motion adopting a
resolution entering an agreement with Service Environmental Engineering Corporation for the
Phase I Environmental Study of the Aiple's property for an amount not to exceed $1,600.
Attachment
07/01/97 12: 53
ft1 612 644 7008
SERVICE ENV ENG
@002
J
July 1, 1997
[SERVICE.
Environmental & Engineering
2200 University Aile. W. #1 JC Sf. Paul. MN 551 14
(612) 644.668lJ Fax (612) 644.7008
Mr. Klayton Eckles, P.E.
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota
Re: Proposal for Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
.... Aiple Property
Stillwater, MN
Mr. Eckles:
Per your request, SERVICE is pleased to provide this proposal to complete a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the above referenced site. SERVICE will complete the
Phase I ESA in general accordance with ASTM requirements for a lump sum cost ofSl,fOO.OO.
SERVICE will complete the work within three weeks of receiving written authorization.
The work will be completed in accordance with our Standard Form of Agreement. Pleasl~
complete the signature block below and return a copy to SERVICE as authorization to pr'lceed.
Signed:
.
Date:
Name:
Title:
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 644-6680.
Sincerely,
~~/~~
Mark S. Mason
Senior Project Manager
enclosure
~o~~ F\":-teI&<J
~O~ t''J1I CaruiiUm'l1r W3.$ftt
@
97066ProPhas( ESA0797
.1
.
.
.
07/01197
ftl 612 644 7008
12:54
SERVICE ENV ENG
~003
SERVICE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION
GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Clienl hereby relains Service Environmental Engineering. Co~ration
("SERVICE'') to perform certain envlronmentll services ('Wort ') under
the terms and conditions as Ht forth herein.
1. FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL WORK
SERViCe wlll perform Wort, and invoice at the rates set forth in the
anent rate schedule. unless otherwise s~ bv addendum. Client
agrees to remit payment in accordance with SERVICES normal terms
and conditions. but in no case will remittance exceed 30 clays beyond
the invoiC8 date,
2. CLIENTS OBLIGATION
Client shall provide SERVICE with al available material, data and
informaticn pertaining to the specific project or activity. Client will retain
sole and complet. ....pen.ibUily for the safety conditions not directly
related to SERVICE activities It III work sites and agrees to fullY
defend, indemnify and hold SERVICE hermlees ageinst and from any
claim esserted 8gRinst SERVICE arising out of such conditions.
3. CONFIDI!NTIAUTY
Each party sfoall retail u confidantie! all information and data fumished
to it by tHe other party and designated as conftcl.ntial, in writl~, by the
other Plrty. Nothing here;n shilll pravent ellher P!lrtv fnlm dISclosing
and/or using Information or dela designated as confidential
(i) when the same is ectually known fo the receiving party before being
fUrniShed;
(ii) when the information or data is generally available to the pubftc at
any time before or after it is acquirecf;
(ilij wllere the information or data . obtained or acquired in gcoc:l faith at
any time from a third party who is not under any oblIGation to the
transmitting party; or
(iv) where a written release is obtained by the receiving party from the
transmitting party.
4. CUEHrS DOCUMENTS
Arty ~orts drawings, plans. or other documents (or copie.) fumiahed
to SERVICE ~ the Client shall, It Client's written request, be returned
upon completlOtl of the Work hereunder, providei:l, however, that
SERVICE may re"ln on. (1) copy of any such aocumenls,
5. OWNERSHIP OF COCUMIiNTS AND USE OF REPORTS
All documents ~pared by SERVICE as part of the Wort shall remain
the prop.rty of SERVICE. In the ltVent Client fails to perform any of its
unclertaJdngs or obl~tions as set forth herein, .a reports or documents
furnished by SERVICE will not be ueed bv Client and will be retumed to
SERVICE upon demand. SERVICE will l8tain all pertinent records
conceming services performed by It for a period of not less than two (2)
yea~ alter condusion of the services, dtrin~ which till'l8, such records
will be made available te Client during SERVICE's normal business
hours, subject to reasonable charges aet8rmined by SERVICE. Client
shall not make disclosure to otfle~ of pc:lrtiOI'l$ of any report or
documents prepared by SERVICE constituting less than tile entire
report. RepOrts and documents furnished or prepared by SERVICE are
neither intended nor representeci to be suitable for re-u1l8 by Client or
ethers, or for any other project or purpose. SERVICE wi. net be
reilp(!nlible for the Interpretation by others of the information developea
by SERVICE, Notti~.n In this Agreement shall be imrpreted to prevent
S'ERVICE from a lcation .net subsequ.nt use of any information,
except confldentla Information, learned by It from this project.
e. PROJECT DELAYS
If SERVICE is delayed at any time in the progress of any sjlecific
project or 8CtIv1ty by any act, failure to act or n.glec:t of Client or Clienfs
.~Ioy.. or any other PlIrtl.. by changes in tile scope of the wort, by
unforeseen drcumslllllC8s incluiling acts of force mlljeure, induding
without limitation, fires. floods, riotS, strikes, by foreign or domestIC
gOl/emmental acts or regulations, by delay authorized by Cli.nt and
lKned to by_SERVICE, or by any caUIe beyond the realOnable control
or SERVICE, Chen the tkne for completion of the Work and the expi-
raticn date sha. be extended to sutllclently compensate for said delays.
SERVICE shaD receive 8n equitable co~nsation adjustment if the
delays caused by any 'of the above result In changes In scope, or result
in additional coals to SERVICE.
7. INSURANCE
SERViCe provides its own worker's compensation insurance.
SERVICE also provides for general and profeSSional liability Insurance
to a mpimum of $1,000.001>. However, under no circums..nces will
SERVICE be responsible for personal inlUl)' or property damage from
any causer Including 11", and explolllon\ ~ond the amount of this
ccvera;e, 1'1 addition. SERVICE shall be InclUded IS an edditionaland
Intenclea benenclary under any hold harrrHu or IncI::O= egRlem8llts
mede between or among Clleilts and third partlH p ng or benefit.
Ing client including, without limitation, agIMments wth other con.
tractors, conlultants, subcontractors, luppl'-rs or othe~ who may
perform work or provide matetl81 to Cltent, and whether or not in con-
nection with the services to be performed by SERVICE.
8. WARRANTY
SERVICE's Work will be performed with that I,;.vel of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by members of SERVICE s professions under
sillilsr condllons including, but not linited to lime and bUdgetary
constraints. This warrenty is in lieu of all or any other warranties. either
ellpr8sMd or implied.
9. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
SERVICE shaD not be responsible or liable for a'IY incidental, indirect,
or consequential damages (including Iou of pro"'!s) Incurred bV Client
or any third party caused by Work performeo by SERVICE cr by
applicatia1 or use of reports or other work Ilerforr.,ed hereunder. Client
agrees to defend, indemnify and hold SERVICE 'larmless against and
frOm any such claims.
10. UMITATlON OF LIAI!lILITY
SERVICE's liability, and Client's exclusive remf~dy, for any cause of
action lrilins hereunder whether based in cont.aCt, tort or any other
cause of action, shall be limited to the amount c' the project fees. AU
claims shall be deemed waived unlels made in \\'~iting and received by
SERVICE with!n one (1) year after SERVICE's Cl',mpletion of the Work.
11. INDEMNIFICA TICH
Except eSl)rovided in SectIon 10 above, Client shall indemnify and hold
harmless SERVICE and Its affiliates, officers, directors, employees
against any and all claims, COlts. 10ultS. and damages for death,
personal InJury, or damage to property (includlng:osts Of resolution) to
tne comper'at1Ye extent tile same have I)een prox matelv caused by the
negligent acts or omissions or willful millconduo:t of Client or Clients
suesidiaries, affiliates, .mployees, agents, contrr.:tors, or advisors.
12. ADDmONAL WORK
This Agreement is limited to Work described on Exhibit A. Any
additional services sha. be authorized in Writillg, duly endorsed on
exhibit A or on 8n attachment thereto. and shal!:>! subject to the terms
and conditions set forth henlln.
13. MISCEUANEOUS
(al This AlIreement constitutes the entlr. und.~ tanding of the parties
raflllting to the provision of Work by SERVICE to tI,e Client. All previous
proposals"" off8~"" and other communications rela.:ive to the provision of
Work by oERVI",E, oral or written, are hereby! Ilperseded. except to
the elltent that theY hIVe been exprusly incol porated herein. Any
modlneations or revision of any provisions hergaf or any additional
provisions contained in anyrUrcllase order, acknowledgement or other
form of the Clent shall no operate to modify tllis Agreement. This
Agreement' shall take effect upon lICQeptancp. and execution by
SERVICE and Client.
(b) In the event Client shall fall to perform Its agreements and
undertakings set forth herein, IncludlnJl non-paym~nt of Invoices, or any
other breech at this Agreement, SERVICE stiall oe enlitled 10 recover
as ~rt of Its damages lIS reasonable legal ,::osts and expenses,
Including reasonable attorney's fees, for brlngl~. and maintaining any
such ac6on,
(c) This Agreement shall be governed by and col'struecl In accordance
with Ih. laws of the State of Minnesota. Each I=.uty hereby agrees to
submit to the 'lCclusive jurisdiction of the cc 'Jrts of the Stats of
Miln,esota in any legal proceedings brought by anf party 10 enforce any
prOVision of this Agreement
Cd) Neilher party may alsign Its rights or ollllgatlons under this
Agreement without the prior written consent of th,; other party.
Client
By:
Its:
Date:
SERVICE Environmental Engineering Corporation
By:
Its:
Date:
'"
4
.
FYI
July 10, 1997
STILLWATER TOWN BOARD MEETING
Town Hall
7: 30 P. M .
PRESENT: Chairperson David Francis, Supervisors Louise Bergeron,
David Johnson, Jerry Hicks and Sheila-Marie Untiedt.
Also, Planner Meg McMonigal and Attorney Tom Scott.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P Bergeron/Untiedt moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(5 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Untiedt/Bergeron moved to approve the 6/26/97 Stillwater
Town Board Meeting Minutes as amended:
1. Item #4 add IImovedll at the start of the motion.
(5 ayes)
M/S/P Bergeron/Hicks moved to approve the 7/2/97 Special Stillwater Town
Board Meeting Minutes as amended:
1. Paragraph #2 add that the Planner is authorized
to seek grant money.
(5 ayes)
3. CHECKS/CLAIMS -Claim #1668 through #1684 were approved for payment.
. BROWNS CREEK MORATORIUM - County Administrator Jim Schug was present.
he County was asked to take over certain water problems when the Browns
Creek WMO disbanded. The County has been working on th~'problems but does
not have the authority to do some things that are necessary. The County
has petitioned for a watershed status for the Browns Creek area. One
thought is that Carnelian/Marine Watershed might include Browns Creek under
their jurisdiction. In the meantime the County is requesting that Stillwater
Township consider a one year moratorium on any development that would have
impact on Brown's Creek. The Township position will be to follow the City's
lead in this matter.
5. AUAR - Sherre Buss was present to discuss any possible environmental
impact on the entire annexation area and how it might be avoided, minimized,
or mitigated. Of great concern is Browns Creek. A diversion of storm water
from Long lake to wetlands north of McKusick, though McKusick Lake to the
St. Croix would help keep Browns Creek from being adversely affected. The
AUAR plan is in its final stages. Ms. Buss asked for feedback regarding a
trail, mentioned by DNR, along Browns Creek. Consensus of the Board is that
it is a delicate area and a trail would not be advisable.
6. NSP PERMIT - M/S/P Bergeron/Untiedt moved to approve the NSP Permit
STRC-MEN-CAS (Stillwater Township) regarding a gas main on Mendel Road.
(5 ayes)
e. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GRANT - M/S/P Untiedt/Bergeron moved a resolution
hat the Town Clerk and Planner are authorized to submit an application for
grant money to use toward updating the Township Comprehensive Plan. (5 ayes)
"
Stillwater Tdwn Board Meeting - 7/10/97
Page Two
~
8. SCOTT ROBERTS SUBDIVISION - The County has denied the rezoning and Mr.
Roberts will submit a revised plat to the Board. .
9. PUBLIC WORKS -
1. July 14 - Meeting with Shifsky, the Township
Engineer and Director of Public Works to discuss
the roads in the 1997 road maintenance project.
2. Louise B~rgeron to contact MNDOT about the
survey of 113th Street and Penfield.
3. The City of Stillwater will be billed for
roadwork.
10. MEETINGS -
1. July 14 6:00 p.m. Riverview Meeting Room at the
. City of Stillwater Municipal Building - Joint
Planning.
2. July 14 7:30 p.m. Margaret Rivers Room at the
Stillwater Library - City Planning Commission
Meeting.
11. ZEPHYR ANNEXATION - Township will not stand in the way providing
reasonable rules are put in place.
12. STONEBRIDGE TRAIL TURN-UP - Suggested that the road be straightened and
costs be split for buying necessary property. David Johnson will create a
letter for consideration at the next Town Board Meeting.
13. PARK POSSIBILITY ON COUNTY 15 - The Township Park Committee will be as~
to consider the possibility of a park jointly held by the City of Stillwat~
Grant City and Stillwater Township.
14. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting adjourned around 11:10 p.m.
Clerk
Chairperson
Approved
.
t - :_'.:'::_:~ r?}-~}-~;:~'~~~:<'_;i;:::~:~->; -~. ,~::~~,-~-:-~~:_,:, ,~': _:__~: ':',', ('. ::~>; <:_~."<_:-tj
. 1999i'&~,m~fOi(t-::~i;~~~ies...its~e~ql!i- )i'<
cent~mJial,i')50yep.rs aft~r.'the.. organiza- :~,
tion. of Miri~e~oiaTerrito[y 6~': March 3,:
1849L;ih~joitowi~f.ficii;)haii~~lilette;w'ds>".", ';,
..,...".;,. ,;:.,' 'y.'.,",,; , . ",,,:,""'L
wntten lJy,Bob (Joodrriall; localhistoriari:.,:"ij':;1'i',
_, ," -"-:,'l"'~< '_-, ';:,"_ :':".,,''- "".':""'-":"--":-'f~,'- _V__"'~":','.',<_:'::--'_',,'" ,~lf...
~ This is~imeola serieSlellini;bltheeve;;is";;J:::'7r1~*:
,iha!ledYp'!?'t~'e7qi1f;rJbii'.pl!~e'i~;ri!~d~f':~~~:~!~
as they migh(haveoeeiiseen f}jiti'Stillw,at(/f.";:":"~
.'. 11lerchantp[the time/Although Hiram and
. his co~i~\EiYa 'arepro'd~c;/pft1i~!l.ut!zor''s
imagination; tiie'~ventsHif'dm'''desc''ibes
i-ea~iy hiipI/e~ed. :.;:: '" .,:. ;.-; :.i-:.>:'~'i,;\ ,:i',~-_> ,cr
.--,.,' " ./"
"'--.'-".-",
-,,;,<t"- -;_ --:~-"/'-':
~ ;,:,- '..'-
.,
, -' ~ '.
',.".','- " :;;- ,~- f '::! :..,
"1"
" ,<t" -,~
.
.
.
.
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its advisory and standing committees, and
three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings
should be directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro Information Line at
602-1888 and on our .web page at: www.metrocounciJ.org. Comments on Council issues can be made by electronic mail at:
data.center@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public Comment Line at 602-1500.
".
DATE: July 11, 1997
WEEK OF: July 14 - July 18
:METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Transportation Committee - Monday, July 14, 4 p.m., Chambers. The committee will consider:
endorsement of ISTEA applications; concur with Transportation Advisory Board bylaw amendment to
Article ill B membership selection; donation of retired Metro Mobility vehicles for welfare reform
transportation; performance based funding for rural/smaIl urban transit providers; regional transit capital set
aside project approval; authorization to execute a contract for tire lease and service; approval of resolution
authorizing the receipt of state capital funds; road/congestion pricing update; report on northern Dakota
County transit redesign service pIan-post public hearing; Metro Mobility transition update; Metro Transit
general manager's update; airport mediations update; and other business.
Industrial Rate System Task Force - Tuesday, July 15, 7:30 a.m., Room lA. The task force will
consider: review of format of existing MCES rate system; continuation of discussion of the industrial rate
system; and other business.
Metropolitan Radio Board ManagementlFinance Committee - Tuesday, July 15, 1 p.m., Metropolitan
Counties Government Center, 2099 University Av., St. Paul.
Southeast Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Work Group and City of Cottage Grove Council
Members - Wednesday, July 16,9 a.m., State Office Building, room number to be posted in lobby, 100
Constitution A v., St. Paul.
Committee of the Whole- Thursday, July 17,4 p.m., Room lA. The committee will discuss the
Metropolitan Council's 1998 Unified Budget Review.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul. Meeting times and
agenda are subject to change. For more information or confirmation of meetings, call 602-1447, (TIY: 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 602-1888 for coming meetings and agendas and other Council
information.
TENTATIVE MEETINGS TIlE WEEK OF JULY 21 THROUGH JULY 25, 1997
Community Development Committee- Monday, July 21, Noon, Room lA.
Finance Committee - Monday, July 21, 4 p.rn., Room 2A.
.
Southwest Metro Groundwater Work Group - Tuesday, July 22, 1 p.m., Prior Lake Fire Station, 16676
Fish Point Rd., Prior Lake.
.
Environment Committee- Tuesday, July 22, 4 p.m., Chambers.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, July 23, 8 a.m., Nicollet Island Inn, 95 Merriam St., Minneapolis.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee- Wednesday, July 23,8:30 a.m., Room
lA.
Transportation Advisory Board - Wednesday, July 23, 2 p.m., Chambers.
Legislative Strategy Group - Thursday, July 24, 3 p.m., Room lA.
Metropolitan Council- Thursday, July 24,4 p.m., Chambers.
Public Hearing on Proposed 1998 Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Budget (as part of
the Metropolitan Council meeting), - Thursday, July 24, 4 p.m." Chambers.
Special Committee of the Whole - Thursday, July 24, 5 p.m., or immediately following the Council
meeting, Room lA.
METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
Commission Tour - Tuesday, July 15, 3 p.m. The commission will tour Scott County Cleary Lake
Regional Park, Scott County Regional Trail, and Normandale Lake in Hyland-Bush-Anderson Lakes Park
Reserve.
The Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission offices are located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth
St., St. Paul, MN 55101. Meeting times and agendas occasionally may be changed. To yerify meeting
information, please call 602-1456.
.
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FAaLrnES COMMISmON
Intergovernmental Relations Committee - Monday, July 14, 1 p.m., Metrodome, Commission
Conference Room, 900 So. 5th St., Minneapolis. The committee will consider legislative issues.
Concessions Marketing Committee - Tuesday, July 15, 1:30 p.m., Commission Conference Room,
Metrodome, 900 So. 5th St., Minneapolis. Tne committee will consider: 1998 budget; plaza; 15th
anniversary; and other business.
Commission Meeting- Wednesday, July 16,9:30 a.m., Commission Conference Room, Metrodome, 900
So. 5th St., Minneapolis. The commission will consider: 1998 budget; plaza; 15th anniversary; reject bids
for portable stage project; Bloomington land; volume services contract; SIT contract; legislative issues; and
other business.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN
55415. All meetings are held in the conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting times and agendas
occasionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Nancy Matowitz, 335-3310.
.
2
4
.
.
.
~ Metropolitan CoUDell
METRO DIGEST
June, 1997
A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks &
Open Space Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission
meetings are filed with the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period
?f up to two years and can be viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting
mformation and/or specific questions.
Metropolitan Council
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further
information regarding the contents of this publication, contact Sandra Lindstrom at 602-1390. The Council's general
. nurttber is 602-1000 (TDD: 291-0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 602-1888 for recorded information about
Council publications, Council actions, coming meetings, job openings and subsidized housing referrals. Recent
Council publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area. Publications can be ordered bye-mail.
The address is: data.center@metc.state.mn.us. Conunents can be made to that address as well as 602-1500, the Metro
Council Public Comment Line. Check the internet web site at http://www.metrocounciLorg.
The Council...
Community Develonment
because it did not contain the required
notification to MnDOT concerning potential
obstructions to air navigation. The city was
advised that the plan will fully satisfy the
requirements of the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act once the required plan
modification has been made and reviewed
by the Council.
. appointed Bill Schreiber to represent the
Council on the MetroGIS Policy Board; and
endorsed Richard Jolmson and Rick
Gelbmann as the Council's representatives
on the MetroGIS Coordinating Committee.
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
execute an interim GIS data- and cost-
sharing agreement with Washington County
consistent with the stated general provisions.
. found that Gem Lake's comprehensive plan
could be adopted with no required
modifications; advised the city to prepare a
Surface Water Management Plan consistent
with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes
9103B.235 and 9473.859, Subd. 2. for
submission to the Council for review before
December 31, 1998; advised the city that it
may receive lower priority for funding over
which the Council has direct or advisory
authority because its comprehensive pIan is
inconsistent with the Regional Growth
Strategy and housing goals and policies
contained in the Regional Blueprint and is
not in conformity with the regional system
plan for Water Resources Management,
which is based on the Strategy; advised Gem
Lake to implement to the extent feasible the
Regional Growth Strategy objectives for
urban area communities by:
. found the city of Watertown's
comprehensive plan amendment in
conformity with regional system plans and
the Regional Blueprint and advised the city
that it plan to meet or exceed the residential
development density objectives to 2020 as it
updates its comprehensive plan.
. found the city of Richfield's comprehensive
plan to be consistent with the Regional
Blueprint; in conformity with the regional
system plans for recreation open space,
transportation and water resources
management; and compatible with the plans
of adjacent government units and school
districts. The plan was found not in
conformity with the aviation system plan
.
METRO DI6EST
with the 1996 Regional Blueprint, Water
Resources Management Guide/Policy Plan,
Transportation Development Guide/Policy
Plan and Aviation Development Guide/
Policy Plan.
.
1. preparing a plan for increased residential
densities and intensification of land uses in
appropriate areas of the community;
2. using cluster platting techniques to
develop its remaining vacant residential
land; and
3. initiating collaboration with its
neighboring communities to provide
affordable and life cycle housing.
"'>
. took action to retain the present approved
boundaries for Rum River Central Regional
Park; to have staff review on a parcel basis,
at Anoka County's request, revising Rum
River Central Regional Park boundaries to
include the residential parcels without the
buildings if the parcels are put on the
market; to approve the schematic
development plan for Rum River Central
Regional Park; and requested that prior to
Phase 2 funding, Anoka County submit a
detailed development plan as a master plan
amendment.
. informed Eden Prairie that their MUSA
expansion request, except for the
approximately 280 acres identified for
airport protection and building area, is
consistent with the Regional Blueprint;
authorized extension of the current review
period for up to 60 days to review that part
of the application which proposes to include
approximately 280 acres of airport
protection and building area expansion land
in the MUSA; requested the Metropolitan
Airports Commission to develop a timetable
and resolution of intent to acquire the
various affected properties under both the
existing airport configuration and the
proposed expansion of Flying Cloud Airport
and report back to the Council within 45
days; and advised the city that when it
updates its comprehensive plan to satisfy the
1998 Metropolitan Land Planning Act, it
should bring its local plan into conformance
Page
2
. accepted the 1996 Agricultural Preserves
Status Report and forwarded it to the State
Legislature and Department of Agriculture.
. awarded spring Tax Base Revitalization
Account grants to St. Paul, Fridley, St. Paul
Port Authority and MCDA/Minneapolis.
. authorized its staff to take the necessary
steps to enter as a party into the Minnesota
Municipal Board's proceeding on the
incorporation of Spring Lake Township,
providing testimony regarding the adverse
effect of the proposed incorporation on
Council plans and policies; and the Council
notified all parties identified in the Board's
Certificate of Mailing of the Council's intent
to enter the proceeding as a party.
.
Environment
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
award and execute a contract for a Bioxide
Storage Tank at Meter 132 to J & D
Enterprises, Inc., Lavaque Road, Duluth,
MN for their low bid of $79,963.
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a purchase option
agreement for the site recommended by the
Southeast Regional Plant Work Group.
. authorized its staff to submit the Metro Plant
Master Plan to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency by June 26, 1997, in
fulfillment of the Metro Plant NPDES
Permit requirement.
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
reject all bids for the Metropolitan
.
I
June, 1997
.
.
.
.
METRO DI6EST
Wastewater Treatment Plant Process
Control System, MCES Project #910800.
· authorized its Regional Administrator to
award and execute a contract for Brooklyn
Park Lift Station Flow Capacity
Improvements, MCES Project #960513, to
NewMech Companies, Inc., 1633 Eustis
Street, St. Paul, MN 55108, for their low
bid of $326,800.
· authorized its General Manager of
Wastewater Services to negotiate, and its
Regional Administrator to execute, a
contract for Professional Services for the
MWWTP Solids Processing Improvements,
Step I Facility Planning with the fInns
presented at a cost not to exceed $725,000
for Fiscal Year 1997 and $1,465,000 for
fiscal year 1998 (contingent upon approval
of the 1998 Capital Budget).
· approved a resolution authorizing the
Council to file a petition for condenmation
of the property interests necessary for the
Chaska Interceptor, Project #920600.
· authorized its Regional Administrator to
enter into a Construction Cooperation
Agreement with Hennepin County for
relocation by the County of the Council's
sanitary sewer in CSAH 15 and payment to
the County by the Council in the
approximate amount of $330,597 for the
relocation.
Finance
· Found it in the public interest to discuss
labor negotiation issues in closed meetings
of its Finance Committee following the
regularly scheduled meetings in July,
August, September, October, November and
December.
· approved the appointment of Jay Lindgren
as General Counsel for the Metropolitan
Page
3
Council, effective June 30, 1997, and
approved Resolution 97-12 designating his
position eligible to participate in the MSRS
unclassified retirement program.
· approved a revised investment policy.
· approved the submittal of the 1996
Performance Evaluation Report to the
Legislature in conformance with the
requirements in Minnesota Statutes Chapter
473.13, Subd. 1A.
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
enter into contracts with Andersen
Consulting, LLP and PeopleSoft, Inc. for an
amount not to exceed $3,860,645 and other
vendors as necessary to procure hardware,
network consulting and the database
software necessary to support the financial
system implementation, with total amounts
not to exceed $608,500.
· authorized its staff to enter into a contract
with Vegernast Engineering in the amount
of $272,000 to plan the migration ofMCTO
to the region-wide 800 MHz system, to
design a new Operations Center for radio
dispatching in the Heywood building and to
evaluate the costs and benefits of
participation in the region-wide system by
Metro Mobility and MCES radio operations,
including the merits of co-location!
consolidation of dispatching agency-wide.
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
enter into an agreement between the
Metropolitan Council and the Confidential
Administration Staff Association (CASA)
for the period January 1, 1997, through
December 31, 1997.
. informed the Metropolitan Area Agency on
Aging that the Metropolitan Council has
limited statutory authority and is not able to
provide further financial assistance to the
program.
June, 1997
METRO DI6EST
.
.
Parks
. amended its 1997 Unified Capital Budget to
include $5,833,300 in new capital program
authorizations and $1,044,700 in new 1997
capital budget expenditures for regional
park system capital projects. These projects
will be financed with $3,500,000 or 1997
state appropriations and $2,333,300 of
Metropolitan Council bonds; reaffmned its
January 9, 1997, commitment to issue up to
$5:3 million plus issuance costs of five-year
general obligation bonds in 1998 and 1999
as a 40% match to state appropriations
received from 1994 to 1997 to meet cash
flow needs and proposed projects in the
1998-1999 regional parks capital
improvement program; authorized grant
agreements financed with 1997 state
appropriations and Metropolitan Council
bonds; and adopted a resolution authorizing
an agreement with the State of Minnesota
for the $3.5 million state appropriation in
1997.
. approved a resolution requesting payment of
$3 million from the Department of Natural
Resources for distributing Fiscal Year 1998
regional park operations and maintenance
grants; and distributed Fiscal Year 1998
regional park operation and maintenance
grants to the regional park implementing
agencies by August 1, 1997, as required
under Minnesota Statutes 473.351.
Transportation
. authorized its Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a grant agreement
with the City of Apple Valley for the Apple
Valley Transit Station in an amount not to
exceed $920,000
Page
4
. endorsed the W elfare-to- Work
Transportation Initiatives report as a
framework for implementing new strategies
to meet the transportation needs related to
welfare reform.
. adopted the Transportation Advisory
Board's comments regarding ISTEA
reauthorization and transmitted them to the
congressional delegation and state and
federal transportation officials.
. authorized its Transit Operations to extend
the up-to-$500 driver incentive program, the
$100 employee referral program and the 31-
day pass customer referral program from
July 1, 1997, through June 30, 1998.
The Council also:
. appointed Jules Smith as Vice Chair of the
Council's Finance Committee.
.
New Publications
Council publications are available from the
Council's Regional Data Center. For a free
and complete list of publications, write the
Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth
St, S1. Paul, MN 55101, or call 602-1140.
E-mail address is:
data.center@metc.state.mn.us.
There is a charge for some publications.
The bi-monthly Council Directions newsletter
provides information on regional issues and
Council Programs. If you wish to receive a
copy of Council Directions, call Carol Berens at
602-1447.
.
June, 1997
.
.
.
METRO DIGEST
Metropolitan Commission Activities
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located
at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For
more information, call Lynn Sorenson at 726-8186.
The Commission:
. , voted in support of the concept of
. Runway 4-22 at 12,000 feet and
authorized its staff to work with
Northwest Airlines and the adjacent
communities to define the impacts
associated with the proposal.
· awarded a contract for the continuing
preliminary design architectural
consultant for the Lindbergh Terminal
complex to the firm ofHarnme1, Green
and Abramson, Inc., subject to fee
negotiations with Metropolitan Airports
Commission staff.
· authorized continuation of the current
lottery agreement with the Metropolitan
Public Airport Foundation at the
Lindbergh Terminal Building on a
month-to-month basis subsequent to
further review and a recommendation by
the Management and Operations
Committee.
Page
5
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission (MP&OSC)
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission
offices are located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth
St., St. Paul, 55101. For more information, call Ellie
Porter at 602-1312.
The Commission:
. forwarded its recommendations to the
Metropolitan Council concerning the
authorization of regional park grants
fmanced with $3.5 million 1997 state
appropriations and $2.33 million
Metropolitan Council bonds and
requested payment of fiscal year 1998
regional park operations and
maintenance funds as reflected on page
4 of this publication.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities
Commission (MSFC)
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are
located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415.
For more information, call Nancy Matowitz at 335-
3310.
The Commission:
There were no formal actions taken by the
Commission during the month of June.
June, 1997
~.~..( M
.
J.E Laskin Co.
The Best of North America
Traditional North American Goods
Rugs
Furniture
Lamps
308 E. Chestnut Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Phone / Fax (612) 439-5712
MaRLY
Enclosed please find proposed letter to MNDOT,requesting
Historic Directional signs for our Historic district. The letter
answers MNDOT criteria for said signage. The City Chamber will
do All of the work(letters,begging,that kind of stuff) as we
think its just one of those things that ought get done,
(if Finland MN gets those signs,why not us?).
We do ask for a letter of endorsment from the City,if possable,
FOR COUNCIL ON JULY 15th.
AS ALWAYS,THANKYOU!
r---
J s Laskin
Goverment Relations,past pres
pulls the weeds,waters the grass.....
.
.
r
DQ8J' }(Ir. Baker:
This letter is in regard to our requ~lt that the Stillwater Katonal Historic District be
rscognized with brown "Stillwater National Historic District" directional signs on Interstate
Highv-'llY 94 and when en~ring Stillwater on State Highways 9' and 36.
The Stillwater National Hi.torie District \Val nominated for said statui in 1989 and wa.s
officially deiignatcd JU(1h the following year. Stillw&~ far exoeed, the requirements for said
&ignage as demonstrstid hl)f8:
1) Interpretive Centers for explaining the significance of the DistriQt:
a) Warden'. House Museum. Housed in the originAl TerritoriAl Prilon Warden's
House, the musewn haa exbibitJ pertainini to Stillwater's logging, prillon, civil
war and local hisWry. Staff on site for historical rC8CIU"Clh. Open scven c.laya il.
week May..October, reduced hours in winter.
b) Washingtun County Historic Court Hou~ & Museum. Minnesota's oldest
standinS Court House is on the r\'ational Resister of Nisto1'ic PIscal. Exhibitl
change every few months. Staff is available Monday through Friday, 9 am to ~
pm. The Courthouse has a number of special events throughout the year.
c) Depot Museum. Housed in the n.,w ~!inn(lsota ZC!ph)T Depot, the Museum is
dedicated to the logging and train history of Stillwater. Open seven days a
week 10..8 in swnmer, tOlleI' hOW"l in wintor.
d) City of Stillwater Chamber of Commerce. Housed in the Orand Garage, it is
stAffeld Monday-Friday, 9 am to 5 pm '-\o1th general information available 011 the:
Historic District.
2. The Hi&toric Dillrlctha& 2419 Parking 'paces.
"., ".
.
.
"~
\
. I
.!
.
.
.
;:;;'l.'r,~'~.;---_._-
;
_..~-
3. The Historic Distriot haa event; which draw aeveral thou.and people.
a) Tute of Stillwater in Lowell Park (food, rnu.ic, arterawl, balloon rally)
b) St. Croix RiveX' Annual EAgle W'ltcl1 take. place alonS St. Croix IUver in early
Spring. Coordinated by the 1'\ationaJ Park Service Villitor Conter.
c) MUlio on th. Waterfront Wee. pllClCl in LowClll Park on 4 or more IUOQessive
Wednesds.y evening, in the summer.
d) Lwnbeljack OA)" celebrate. Stil1wa_'slumber heritage with a Lwnbetj~k
competition, musio, food, ftr.worlu etc. Cover. much of downtown.
c) Rivertown Restoration Annual Hi.tor!c Home Tour. 8 to 10 Hiltorl(l
Properties open to tho publk: for viewina and visiting with the hosts.
f) Fall Colon Fine Art and Jazz Fe.tival takeR place in Lowell Parle first wCJOkend
in Oc~ber.
g) Int=national Antiquarian Book Fair draw; viaitorlJ from .11 over the world for
antique book aaloa.
h) Victorian Chriatmu at fue Historic CoUrthoulCl il offerllld in during the holiday
Beason with traditional ai.ft:a, food and music.
i) Stillwa_r and 'the hiatoric distnot hOlt many other, smAller event. throughout
tho yoar.
Stillwater'. ohann and hbtoryare embodied in it', Historic Df.trict. We would
like to provide more vi.ibility to vi.im who would appreciate our Histonc
Downtown and reoJ that officiaJ Highway Infonnational Signage would help
provide that viability.
Please feol be to con1aet UI ahould you require additional clarification or
infcnnauon. I ODn bo rCl"hod on Thuradaya and Friday. at 439-5712 or you can
leave a mOllap at the Chamber office with Sunny DeYoung at 439-4001,
Sincerely,
JM'1C!!I Laskin
Oovermrumt Relation,
City of Stillwatw Chamber of Commcr~o
i '.
I' ... ~
f
.,i
,~ '
d ,/~~~l '
~ T. ,...
" " "..'.. _.', ..- . ',' " ../ ",,' ';,' ...." ',' ..,., ... .'."J'1'l:;';<,.i\" ~ :.W!~,." ,.., , - ~"-. . .,.at,' ,UiJ :~~ ;/:,~.\ 'lv t..' _;;' I' \ t- . .. J;~.. :' .,,~ " ,,::," ',',' ',.1 ~'l-.I', .\\ '
,,;' 'l.":,'" .'.' "iI',. - ,~,,"~.ll::'I' Ic.(l'~' . ,( t;i;,,,: '.' ''-' ',!3'l>!,''il :t.~.", "! .L'"r&o,!.,," I '. " ' '" ,,;,., '.r:" , " ,,,,' ,1\ ". J ff D k rt/VII. '0 II N "
~-:O'~"~~r'~:'~""'~~'-~ .~r-..',_!,.;4'.(~/~.,_~~;...'"",,, 't~'''hi:~.t\,''r,~'.. ,,:;.~ ',f -(f~.rtr-",.."", :,,_..,' ~1"'.t.,'t'.1...hT-~--.~'~.~"~:::-! ....n. Inona a yawl
Ki!1l 9rove of Wlnona"flnishes,ti()I~~~~X,9f;~h~f,18~~.O'!~~'SC ;golf ,~ourse~~t ~~e.,~a~k'iGrovehas ~r..lln:aed, with Mark Hoffman to cre-
, ate a newsletter and catalog for dlsc:golf:aflcl()n~dos call~d ""nlque Frlsbee!.9,lI~ltte,rs,'qr,UF,O. ,i~" ,', i '," :i' :,'.' '. " '
, . ","" 4' ,'.' ' '" ('" ',I' . j ,"~~'t"l'!' ,', "),,, ,', i "'1"".""("" '" ',' 'I ,', "
, I" 1':' ". 1'~' 1.~1..1..' ..~,_. ...'~j" . ~"""':I'\r.\,\,..1 II,.",\.' i:'(~!.'{~{tJ ' ~.l ;\ ,;"',1)"', ,\Pi)"-, i1~~\H,tI~j!'r\-: ,1' ,~ ." , " ,
~ " . \ ':".",- 'i,I~,;:"".,I',fl>//,:~~~l;'''I-\;\,;,q.....I'~f' ,",10' ~~';', (j~~ :\' "', ..,"'~Vl 1"1'/' (;' ,'I I,f' ':~'I~\~,,';~,rl~Ll',/,:~~ .~'n)I",1,'I,~, ,', ,fj .' '.~ ' ~ , '"
;", ;~....,1"-if~'~"""'~..t:'.rIH\v"~,,,/~,:,,,~}:'t)h4':'lI'~1"~"t,1"~~.'1.,;;~~:,...'(.~;rl'-~1 ;..,1 )',.- ,1" "~/..'\'t\!\,,.!l,-..\."I:\'I,~\V:,ti'1~.I,l, t\lf' .;
f.');\i'I'~s~~;~~'::;":;'I~~~~t1~;~Cm1'i~~~' :l~:*Jllj:; ~e;~,,:~;;!i':j,ne~~~,~l:{elm~sixle..;~Vva\'/ ,,fo ,'p"lay) -
;'~:i:';;.(,"a:;,.I( ~$'@I~"'"'''''' ';':" ,,:,)',. J....",,' (I,,: }",~I;:,'r",'''4.,.,: \ " ".t" ,J~.t'l ; 1,'.7:" .' . "
If'i,,II'\. ~ \}., '!~~1'~rt,~~l~"',;\,, '.-i;'..'\",~~", :'1:' ',.),','f;lr" .~~.. ir.l!\"~?l ,,;\.t.'Hl!i~; ;~t~;(I>J ,,'. ',/J.;;r),r , . ",of" ' I ',: '. ./.,'
,.~';:~jt::'f~<~~: \~~~\;.,:~1,.~r:~' ';:o(":";~/~fft(je!j'~(~f~!:~;::: ,;_\",:<_{!.;~,i,'~"'~:"""'~~ .. \~f~~"'.'r, ' i~'/' '~'~"t. .;~' I,\t:'{,: . "\r:/~'~~ ,)'~.. ISI~~." .... . I \, \ ' . . ~ f / t ' '\l' :~,J ,
jl>:'.~':"""t ""~""''!.:. ,:"~.;""..,,,...'q\' ~.r.lr ",,," '" <.",J" ,Hjr:'"1'.''' l~"" 1')"',,1" ", ' .',., ,.\o'<~~I'llt~ I' , : I,' ..,.. .
Xl'I'..),~....." ."'~'''''Y:I:~'I''-.,'',.__.. ."" ~n.,,' r'-"l'j' ~,,\I, '~.,r;o",1'",: "fl','" ~I'II (t(\'l.). + ,.,I, . ~r .~, " , . ~'.' ~'
1" , . . . , , , ,_. '. l~~l~r.\,.,tu "'l'~:i:f!Y~" ')~)~~.,. ~'!!~'~~' "'~.~J" 4"~lf " ~:, ,t , '., .~:'. 'Ii' < ': .
7~;\;By:Jeff,l!Dan((e" i;,i ,I,', ,~~ ';, ,',. . without labor-intensive mamtenance.
f;Winon~)j,aIlY'~~" ,(;;.\ .: i~\f:",:" , ;',:;'" It's disc g~lf,'~~'accor~g to Kim
,:\,~,,,.,I,vl'~flM(?{I;!,m,:'.1:4H)~~ 'i' ::,~l': ,;~l'; ,.':' ,'.1,,' Grove qf\Wmona It's the/sport of the
~~j.bl('you're'seri6 a out.golf':a tYPi-"::.'.' future/'" ',,' " ,':' :\',,~,' ',',~:,; ,
':~~c81;g~elr~q#s1,~\1?'ag!~i.~~:c~\fl?s.J:1'. ""Grove 'an(rher,~'fi~~eei~~k Hoff-
$~(abo~t~$~50,~~t!Y9.~~r~~~),~?green,: "' Illan " helped' pushed,! :"t~,l growing
l;feesl(~,o.Ptt14att~U~Klj~~hOJe){PIUSi ',:, craze:!!) Winona, bY','Vor~g with the
. ~<;l'?!iup~,~d,:~tl~e \to:adl\E:~-r, tOrco~- , :" Park '~d ;,RE;cre~tion{ Dep~ent to
~ ~ ~c!u!?t~@1.l1~!l ~lt~.~,',~.,: " ' "',:. ,update, ~e:'.1~hol~rCOl,l~e iat' Lake
~~~iH9'Yeverl"!(YO ' lay.^1another'1!' ,Park.. ,'.';f/,':: ,:,,\,,1; ,"i'~~i':)':,' , ,
'if,ldnali:9dfgolf<fitO~1I ess~Smoney~t. and "','''' .', m COI\jtinction' With 'the: "World's
, \~~r~l~~},~q~h~'\fei:~~~~~'f~hion\,,~j.,Bigg~s~'Disc,Golf Weekend," they at-
, \C~t\~~~lJVequlfep.1~i'l\mwpee + or:: >tract~d' about 20 people to, the Lake
'Kif\iy'qu'~ef;r~~YAm~"Q~'J.~tOO~.Cj~;" ~8;".." Park; cours~ ,May ,,17-18 to, pl~Y and
\ I. sau~lilI:~~9/~~~91)W~j~B~~,~~:'1.g{> "';~'''~'~ ~ ~~~~brate,~JS, new spo,re'; l"~l' f"r '
.. d,~~Go~~,~~qesq.,\l .e~~~sp'~;i~{f; \1i~..We':11~ve"done ;sor'",l;1ch 'work to
~~e~te~(Acre~g~fpl)'! e! game, ""~"i get :, ,this "" sport '"out:). oo:,j1he i public,"
le8rrl>,r~re'~t"'dlin'.8.lirios",:~" " ;-<lifr':'~U~'.',:>n'~,'," ",~:q.'. . !"" "
,'lillI' ~, """';"," ''''''r.~.,' ~"': ", ~~,r ., Ie 'se~see,DISC GOLFnB"
" .' .,:I~1.' ap~cap \\ ....~I.Il;41..,.. ,", ;'
:~r.'AV~ill.:t,\j. ,;-},<, !t~'.r 'r~,~C; ','-. ',' t"
,'t,~:r.~I~.t,:,:'~~~ ~'~f ~'~" { 1:~.lt:~J !', '" l
,,'.'JI'!."I'~~.''t~'I'J.''::l:'' 1,~.I,. -~I_~,'I",,~'~ \\II,q. ,~~l'.. ~ ! '.,
."':."- I; !'~I'f' A'~,./ "!...f,.,11.1,:~"" ..... .','
.~*.(""t,~ :~\
~.l
.
'r
, i
. i
- "
.1
:1
. :
. I
I
· I
· r
: r
"
.'
.!
. "
-f.
"
.'
,
.'
.
.'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
"
,
,
.
I
,
,
t
,
,j
,
,
"
i' .';
',' "".
'<1''''-
.".' -::~.,
'"
.'j".,
Minnesota serves"as' home ,to
seven species. of. bats.,;The little
brown bati,.northern batl blg:'I'. r, .
bro\Vn' ~an~~qie~1EJrD/plpi~tr~lle . ,t, :;:
roosUn caves; bUildl"gsshd old
mines:'Thesilyer~halredi bat,' red,
bat and hoa'ryrcjosfln'/tl'~es. i
,Ii
t-, ; I ~t. ,'\<'
.,1'::", ;,''!,:(lr':~:'; :'1
'(;, .
'. ,: ~
, ,':' ~(;'
.. .
:' j ';; ::: ,.~:.~,,'\~..~y;
. . ~l_ ~
i " i ' ~ i ".. .' " :,
. ," . .
':.
\.. !
5'
'i,
. ;..: r1 ,: . ~ I I
""8'
i,)!, J'~ '.\;'; ~ \j
, ,; t:.', ...11. ., .
: ,I 1',,1~. ?j""
.' . ~ l~' :.1 .'
:i.;. ",!>;;\t? n.!';"
~. ;
.,'
!:,
I.
I
!
i.'
;~ .
. ,i",},~:(.~. Il-r,:"," .\....,
.... "i'~~ ... t.../
;"\;,",J.'{'':'.(.4f(
~1~{ ~~ -.t:V~'\:
'I~i.~.;\~{ ,,:.~~.:::\.
I. ;/ ;::';:."}';,'l"( ;;\
;,\1' ,; ';.
",'j
: ;,~ ~ ~. . .
',,~
......,.
",
":'"',
,}~' !,~
.'~, .
,I,
's
. "
,.
. ,
'I" . .
j I;;};.. ,
. "~ ;'!\rl!{::\:~~':':;?~~i,: .,: ",'.
j;"~U'~~~l~,:,:\~~9fZ.,,, "-.' "'j,,'.,
,:,"<\ ,(:,..~..v.~j,.,~,.,!1....l~.,-~ I,' ""';' .'.""'.
-I,:. " i.t..'....'~i ill: ,tlt'I""...,lt",n..".tldll
. . ~ .' -
., ; :/!:i:,~i(t'~.
.. ': ,.:l).:ifr;P.age
\. "t;~A~~';
SB
;i
~I(', d..".,!...,!rt,;,/..~i.~~,,',..:.rl_:,l~.t.,i,'" ;;"j: : ' '. t)' '7.l( \, .' I' '''''.l'
, l' '); ;"! ".\i;:,; )'\i,':'}{:;":7~fo:.!~~~i::?t:,..,.,>.:;
:,:,,':j~~~~~~ .:'i:".';'~,:r:: .. ""':'rf:?t"~i',. "
5", '.';,~,~.~'it!!~{;": '. !)' ~,p {,t' " ,;;>!if- ': r" :;
. ,..;{. ' . SI . ~ , ,~ ..' ' . . , '" . , . i. ~
"'(:\111:r'j~\ ,.,'ll'''j ':!Ijt,,!;.1 ",'l. ;,~ r",' .'" '.
, . '.t~ ~.I,I,\" . ~I', 't,' ~, ~. .< r,';r '.j'./"I'r';'t~.f ..,1,1....
_.~,.:4 .r'wM\~-,J\.. t I ~ H' i \ 1,'\<'\0 ~(tfPf \~,. \fl,~ I"" ~~ '~t" ." .. I", l \' ,\ "
: :,.;-.,". ,,/'.'\,0",:',. '; . r '. t 'l, I . !}....'r~ \ r~:.,.,~ "t:...~~ ....;.,. iIj'k~
'.',1... .,,;.'1 [;~R" "lil.i:',jlj;> .".\It:~ "";.'l~!\' \ J ',Ii ,..":r.I)J~~' :;....' .,....\ ',~~, ,,' i:: '
I' . ~'" '); .~ I ,. ' f.},) ~ ;: J q' t~, ,r J)' II t
, ":".\ .'Ii, 1<<"'11"jl :. "1,_ I~'!.'~i~' ".:.' '., .'
. ' ", '. ~ ..( ~ ,I;. r.. \~j~ ". /1,'" ~ ~":::' .
',.' 'i',I" ...."f: ';, .1)iJ 1t1j~ ;1~"Uil/;,'L~\~iS~I'!"~:JTI,..,tl_"'''i '
l' ". I i.It!. ~ . . I ~ 1 . I j I . I.",
'J 1 ' ':"'~i' ''''''~11'1''''' 'tf ~.;b ,!Ii h: l.. ,';' .
'. . . .-.~,I~~. "'~. ~.c.:r,,,.,~,.j, \'.,' \ot.l....,...::"'(,d~."
. Iq.!h '.'IH:'.' f;:Jtl . l.i.i1 f\1 I d' J(\.r1I " \ ., :'-. f
. "".<. ',,1,\ ("'~,~..' ";~'l'\"'J"):':"
.' \4 \"/';~'~~~;'." ';-., l' ot.~I~, t~tr:.:.. :"~l.il~!i~'j',~j%YJlj; ,i'.,::'
'i', . ..... ..f' ~ . 'I ,," ~' 'y'" I . .}i.. 4' .~,,~"I .,
" -.,. \'!'.~fll~ ~{I,. .... 'I .M' i ,!'~l)i .i~\j~.~' :\\1/,\'., '. . ..' . pj,'
I ',,: ,:. ,'.';~ ?''N ":'!i;~~~~t(;{,~.;~:~.,~J~ Ift~.~~,"~.., '.: \',.\l;:.~~~~~~:t\~~lJ,~h~ti.(' ':~.::'~'i.'. \.' . ..',:, :;vi.: 'j' "";;'i(;~;'.i"::~:;'::f~:':!'~ ,,';:Jfiii;\i' ,_
d .d',",' :'JI:~', .'/, ,!:-;;'~)"~~~f'~:, '.', I U .;. f\~W;tI~';t'!(;~/~t"".f'~/il rlotl ~':~ li~m~ 1i ~,'/~\ :~~: u \ r.,;:'~: :.~~i.'\~}~~"'\',~i::";\;JI~Y;:lii: i. ;::lt~:~~\.
'. , . ".' J. ~'l~~<' :. ~'~ ,~} 1J~'..~.'l~'" '" -}-~U..,*..~"'.!i'... io-\' ''l.i'J;, I, i:t, \~~1. ~ . '''.,~''~~ ,ti'- .' ,;.:'.(.;.... ~.(' ~., ~:n ',....fi...~,1~...~:"tl~'~1'\...,.'~~j'\lIn I; ~..M':IJ"';r.~rllr".;J'/ '.
J
.
.
.
" .
.
.
.
'.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.t
;'%~;,;'"
.'~ ...1
~;~'J,;' '"
~,:;f~,~
',~;:L~~!i/r"
:',' '.,
..
i
'I
J ~..8'~G /f~
fi;) ~
:r: (fJ
.
July 1,1997
FYI
r Oil ii
George Ness, Fire Chief
Stillwater Fire and Rescue
216 North 4th Street
:YSiillwater, MN 55082
Dear Chief Ness and Volunteers:
Congratulations to Stillwater Fire and Rescue on being accepted into The
Prudential Helping Hearts Program and completing its fund drive to purchase a
defibrillator unit. As a result of the efforts of your members, and the generosity
of individuals and businesses in the community, your squad has successfully
met this challenge.
.
Prudential has sent a check in the amount of $ 2,035.00 to Phisio-Control
Corporation in the name of your squad toward the cost of your defibrillator unit.
Prudential is proud to be able to assist your squad in purchasing this valuable
piece of equipment. The residents of Washington County have an added sense
of security knowing that your squad's specially trained members will be able to
make this life-saving procedure available in your community.
I commend your volunteers for their tireless community service efforts. Best
wishes and continued success!
Lynn Lubeski
Deputy Program Director
The Prudential Helping Hearts Program
,
~
Prudential
16 Prudential Plaza, Newark. NJ 07102-3777 - www.prudentiaLcom/community
~i~1jYate~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA ~
.
DOWNTOWN PARKING COMMISSION
AGENDA
MEETING DATE THURSDAY, JULY 17, 1997
CITY HALL RIVERVIEW CONFERENCE ROOM (2ND FLOOR)
8:30 A.M.
~ ...
'1
Agenda Items.
1. Update on parking signage/Steve.
2. Update on UBe parking lot improvement/Steve.
3. Banquet facility parking/Dick Anderson
4. Other items.
.
i
.i
C!TY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MIN~IESOTA 55082 PHONE 612.439.6121
.
.
i.
JULY , 997
STILLWATER CITY COUNCIL
216 N. 4TH ST.
STILLWATER, MN. 55092
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I'M INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE LOCAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.
I'M MAINLY INTERESTED IN MATTERS RELATED TO ACCESSIBILITY. I WOULD
LIKE TO SEE ALL PARKS EQUIPPED WITH WIDE, EVEN WALKWAYS FOR PEOPLE
WHO REQUIRE ASSISTIVE DEVICES (CANES, WALKERS, WHEELCHAIRS ETC).
ALSa ~EEL IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THE CITY TO PROVIDE RAILS ON BOTH SIDES
OF STAIRS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY, FOR INSTANCE THE MAIN STREET STAIRS
ON THE SOUTH END OF TOWN. (THE BOTTOM STAIRS ARE MISSING THE RIGHT
HAND ASCENDING RAIL. I THINK THE COMMISSION WOULD BE SERVED WELL
BY A WATCH DOG WHO WOULD MAKE A POINT OF CHECKING ON BUSINESS
OWNERS WHO HAVE FAILED TO MAKE THEIR BUSINESSES ACCESSIBLE.
THERE ARE NUMEROUS ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. I'M
WILLING TO GIVE MY TIME AND ENERGY TO WORK ON THOSE AND ANY OTHER
HUMAN RIGHTS MATTERS THAT NEED ATTENTION.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
SINCEREL Y,
In/'y I<.. ~CJ.6cL:-
MARY R. PEROCESCHI
809 S. 6TH AVE.
STILLWATER, MN. 55082
439-4470
r~~~~
f4SUa r
~
Jl.Q...u LU.-cJ ~
07/07/57
15: 14
CI~' OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
NO. 497
002
CITY OF OAK PARK HEZGHTS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY"July 8.1997 -- 7:00 P.M.
.
I. Call To Order/A~proval of Agenda
11. visi tors
III. Department ReDor~s
1. Police
2. Parks
Enclosure 1
..
~ ~ 3. Administration
4. Cable
5. Water Management Organizations
6. Recycling Award
Enclosure 2
7. OPH Business Group
8. Bridge Reports
IV. Consent ~~~Qq (Roll Call Vote)
Enclosures 3. 38. 3C, 3D, & 3E
V. Public Bearinqe
VI.
Un.finished Business
1. Annexation Report
Enclosu~e 4
.
2. Strategic Planning Retreat
Enclosure 5, 58, . 5C
VII. New Business
1. Resolution 97-07-25
Enclosure 6
2. Council Agenda Item Acceptance Policy
Enclosure 7
3. Minnesota Associ~tion of Small Cit~es Conference
VIII.
Corre9-;>ondeI'l~
Ad.journmen~;
.
.
.
i.
Lower St. Croix Planning Coordination Office
117 Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-439-7122
TO:
Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force, Local Governments
and Interagency Contacts
FROM:
Buck Malick, Chair, Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force
Kate Hanson, Planning Coordinator
DATE:
1-"
Tuesday, July 2, 1997
The Lower St. Croix Planning Task Force has scheduled its next meeting for:
Tuesday, July 22 1997
7:00-9:00 p.m.
River Room, Phipps Center for the Arts
109 Locust Street, Hudson
Topic: Winter Recreation
The topic for the July 22 meeting, winter recreation, is the last in a series of
eight topics the Task Force has been discussing over the last several months. Our
recommendations on the following topics are being incorporated with work already
done to outline management alternatives for the Lower St. Croix National Scenic
Riverway Cooperative Management Plan.
These topics are:
* Navigation channel maintenance
* River crossing-s
* Cultural resources
* Interpretation
* Vegetation/forest management practices
* Management structure/Riverway administration
* Land Protection/Riverway Boundaries
* Winter Recreation
After the July meeting, the Task Force needs to resume discussion to
complete work on two of the above topics: management structure and river
crossings. We'll do this at meetings scheduled for: Tuesday, August 5 and
Thursday, August 21. Both of these meetings will be from 7-9 p.m. at the Phipps
Center in Hudson.
If you have questions, please phone Kate at: 612-439-7122 or Buck at 71 5-
386-7010.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Dennis. C. HegbeIg
Dt.tJk:t:' t~ .
, ; ..~:'~ "
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA.
JULY 8, 1997, 9:00 A.M.
Mery Ha_
Dletrlct 2
Welly Ab..hem.on
Dletrlct 3
My.. Pete Non
Dletrlct 4/Chelr
9:00
Roll Call
Deve EngetlOm
Dletrlct 5
Consent Calendar
9:00
Health, Environment and Land Management Department - M. McGlothlin, Director
Acceptance of Funds from UCare for County Development Programs
.,
9:20'" Public Hearing (Continued from 7/1/97) H.E.L.M. Department - M. McGlothlin,Dir.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Request by
Scott Roberts and Penny Sue Roberts
10:20
Public Works Department - D. Wisniewski, Director
St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park Beach
10:30
General Administration - J. Schug,
County Administrator
10:40
Discussion from the Audience
Visitors may share their concems with the County Board of Commissioners on any item not on the agenda. The Chair will direct the
County Administrator to prepare responses to your concems. You are encouraged not to be repetitious of previous speakers and to
limit your address to jive minutes.
Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
This period. of time shaH be used by the Commissio_ It) npon to tire- jUJl Board on COMIffinee activitieS', molte ~erra on mailers
of interest. infomunion, or raise questions to the SllJff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during
this time. MIy action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting.
Board Correspondence
10:55
Adjourn
..................................................................:
Date
July 7
July 8
-
~
MEETING NOTICES
Committee
Resource Recovery Budget Review Committee
Mental Health Advisory
Mosquito Control Exec. Commission
HRA Board .
Community Social Services
Metro TAB
Minnesota Extension
Time
2:00 p.m.
4:00 p.m.
9:00 a.m.
3:00 p.m.
7:30 a.m.
12:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Location
1670 Beam Ave., Suite B - Maplewood
1584 Hadley Ave. - Oakdale City Hall
2099 University Ave. W. - St. Paul
Washington County Government Center
Washington County Government Center
230 E. 5th St. - Mears park Centre
Annual Tour
Assi$tiv. li8tening d.llic'$ .,.. .v..n.bI. for UMI in th. County BDllrd /loom.
/( you n..d u&imnce due to diMbility or "nllUlllle blIrrier, pi... <:811430-6000 (TDD 439-32201
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
ruLY8~1991
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
. Administration
Community Services
"I
County Attorney
Court Administration
Health, Environment
and Land Management
Human Resources
Public Works
.
ITEM
A. Approval of the June 24, 1997 Board Meeting minutes.
B. Approval to transfer of the Risk Management function from Administration to
Human Resources, including the transfer of one permanent full-time position
from Administration to Human Resources.
C. Approval of Child Care Resource and Referral Program two year base grant of
$299,784.
D. Approval of contracted agreement with the Minnesota Department of Economic
Security/Workforce Preparation Branch to provide employment and training
services through the JTPA programs.
E. Approval of modification No.1 to subgrant #90167 Youthworks/Americorps
Program.
F. Approval of 5% rate increase for Opportunity Services, a day training and
habilitation provider for adults with developmental disabilities.
G.
Approval of resolution authorizing acceptance of continued grant funding from
Minnesota Department of Corrections with funds to be used to offset costs of
1 FTE in Victim/Witness Division. .
Approval and authorization to advertise for bids for mobile printer equipment
to be used in conjunction with existing Mobile Data Terminals in law
enforcement cars and Automated Citation Software currently being developed.
H.
I.
Approval of resolution appointing Stuart W. Glaser, Emergency Services
Manager, as Washington County Community Health Services representative to
Metropolitan 911 Board Regional EMS Committee.
J.
Approval of continuation of Special Project Information Specialist through
December 31, 1997; position is being shared among the offices of Auditor-
Treasurer, Recorder and Assessor.
K.
Approval and execution of a supplemental agreement to the Minnesota Trail
Assistance Program for Star Trail Association.
*Consent Calendar items are generally defIned as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved
in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
.1
.'
.
.
i.
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its advisory and standing committees, and
three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Paries and Open Space Commission, and
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings
should be directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro Information Line at
602-1888 and on our web page at: www.metrocouncil.org. Comments on Council issues can be made by electronic mail at:
cr.!ta~enter@metc.state.mn.us or by calling the Public Comment Line at 602-1500.
DATE: July 3, 1997
WEEK OF: July 7 - July 11
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Community Development Committee- Monday, July 7, Noon, Room 1A. The committee will consider:
application for MHFA Rehabilitation Loan Program funds, Phase IX; 1998 MNRRA funding assistance for
Mississippi River corridor planning; request for two-year appointment of senior planner to conduct regional
park system user interview study; MetroGIS web index consultant contract; regional growth strategy
implementation update; briefing on Lino Lakes comprehensive plan amendment; budget presentation;
American Heritage Rivers initiative; and other business.
Finance Committee - Monday, July 7, 4 p.m., Room 2A. The committee will consider: designation of
members of the MSRS Unclassified Retirement Program; approval of 1997 transit operating budget
amendment; authorization to negotiate a loan agreement with the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority;
approval of Metropolitan Sports Facilities budget amendment; approval of transfer from undesignated fund
balance to support regional growth strategy implementation; request for two year appointment for senior
planner to conduct regional park system users' study; 1998 Regional Administration budget review; and
other business. The next portion of the meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
section 471.705, subdivision 1a for discussion oflabor negotiations issues. The meeting will be reopened
to the public following labor negotiations discussion.
Litigation Review Special Committee - Monday, July 7, 5 p.m. or immediately following the Finance
Committee, Room 2A. At its July 11, 1996 regular meeting, the governing body of the Metropolitan
Council voted to close this committee meeting to discuss pending or imminent litigation and attomey-client
privileged matters involving personal injury, workers compensation, employment-related claims and other
matters. This meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 471.705,
subdivision 1 d( e) to discuss a workers' compensation claim.
Southeast Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Work Group - Tuesday, July 8,4 p.m., Room 2A.
Executive Committee - Thursday, July 10, 8 a.m., Nicollet Island Inn, 95 Merriam St, Minneapolis.
Provider Advisory Committee - Thursday, July 10, 10:30 a.m., Room 1A. The committee will consider:
1998-2000 Transportation Improvement Program; ruralIsmall urban performance based funding; 1998
Management Plan update; Metropolitan Council Transit Operations name change; regular route "free pass"
update; and other business.
Legislative Strategy Group - Thursday, July 10,3 p.m., Rooms 1B and 1C
Metropolitan Council- Thursday, July 10,4 p.rn., Chambers. The council will consider: change in
membership in MSRS Unclassified Retirement Program; amendment to 1997 Unified Planning Work
Program; approval to enter into a cost agreement with Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority; MCTO
name change to Metro Transit; authority to apply for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency rehabilitation
loan funds, Phase IX; The Orion Project; contract authorization for airport community economic study; staff
report and recommendations on South Washington County public hearing; Independent School District No.
833 South Washington County park and ride land use and maintenance agreement; and other business.
e
Special Meeting of Committee of the Whole - Thursday, July 10, 5 p.m. or immediately following the
Council meeting, Room 1A. The committee will consider an update on status of Southeast Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St, St Paul. Meeting times and
aGe!l_pa are subject to change. For more information or confumation of meetings, call 602-1447, (TIY: 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 602-1888 for coming meetings and agendas and other Council
information.
TENTATIVE MEETINGS TIlE WEEK OF JULY 141HR.OUGH JULY 18, 1997
Transportation Committee - Monday, July 14,4 p.rn., Chambers.
Industrial Rate System Task Force - Tuesday, July 15, 7:30 a.m., Room 1A.
Land Use Advisory Committee - Tuesday, July 15, 8:30 a.m., Room 1A.
Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission Tour - Tuesday, July 15,3 p.m.
Committee of the Whole - Thursday, July 17,4 p.m., Room 1A.
.
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION
Planning and Environment Committee - Tuesday, July 8, 2 p.m., Room 3040, Mezzanine level,
Lindbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: July ADNE levels; final
contract payments for 1996 airfield electrical construction at MSP, upper level roadway canopy - general
construction and mechanical, badging office glazing, St Thomas Academy sound insulation, Runway
5R123L reconstruction at Crystal Airport, and 1995-96 Part 150 sound insulation program; semi-final
contract payment for ATCT equipment at Anoka County-Blaine airport; contract change orders - 1997
pavement reconstruction and joint sealing, valet parking office/west vertical circulation, east vertical
circulation, Lindbergh Terminal concessions area mods - Phase 1, and upper level roadway canopy -
electrical; contract bids received for mrn Tenninal GSE maintenance facility, runway 14 MALSR, ILS site
work, fencing, etc. at St. Paul Downtown Airport, and Part 150 sound insulation program-June bid cycle;
review of upcoming construction project bids; authorization to negotiate sole-source contract; authority to
negotiate and execute FAA reimbursable agreement - relocation of MSP VOR; Lindbergh Terminal
architectural design services consultant recommendations; Minnesota Pollution Control Agency funding
agreement; tenant environmental compliance status report for Lake Elmo and Airlake airports; joint powers
agreement for City of Blaine; Twin Cities Airports Task Force light rail transit resolution; Part 150 sound
insulation program cost update; capital improvement program adjustments; authority to hold public hearings
_ land acquisition at Flying Cloud, St. Paul Downtown, and Airlake airports; public parking expansion;
Lake Elmo groundwater contamination update; November Planning and Environment Committee meeting
date; ANOMS Program continuing consultant equipment purchase; ANOMS data acquisition; noise
abatement departure procedures; runway 4-22, 29L-11R extension update; and other business.
.
Management and Operations Committee - Wednesday, July 9, 1 p.m., Room 3040, West Mezzanine,
Lindbergh Terminal, Wold-Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: purchase of property
management software; recommendation to award of bid for car starting, towing and police impound
2
.
.
.
contract; Minnesota state lottery; policy regarding long term reliever fire service; public hearing officers
report on ground rental ordinance; background information regarding air service program; legislative
update; proposed legislative agenda; and other business.
Finance Committee - Wednesday, July 9, 10 a.m., Room 3040, West Mezzanine, Lindbergh Terminal
Building. The committee will consider: monthly operating results; summary of investment portfolio;
summary of air carriers passenger facility charges; mid year rates and charges adjustment; PFC application
#2 amendment extension; cellular telephone policy; 1998 operating budget; and other business.
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For
more information, call Lynn Sorensen at 726-8186.
~ "'l
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACll..ITIES COMMISSION
Intergovernmental Relations Committee - Wednesday, July 9, 1 p.rn., HHH Metrodome, MSFC
Conference Room, 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis. The committee will consider legislative issues and
other issues.
Finance Committee - Wednesday, July 9, 2 p.m., HHH Metrodome, MSFC conference room, 900 South
5th St., Minneapolis. The committee will consider: Bloomington land; review preliminary 1998 budget;
volume services contract; SIT contract; and other business.
Capital Improvements Committee- Wednesday, July 9, 3 p.m., HHH Metrodome, MSFC conference
room, 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis. The committee will consider: reject bids - 1997 portable stage
project; 1998 budget; and other business.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St, Minneapolis, MN
55415. All meetings are held in the conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting times and agendas
occaSionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Nancy Matowitz, 335-3310.
3
COMMITTEES:
eKING. HOUSING. AND URBAN AFFAIRS
NERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FOREIGN RELATIONS
.
.
ROO GRAMS
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA OFFICE:
----. --- -'- 11
. j/
JLt - 7 1991 i@
c~ '-7/15/Q 1
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
PH. 202-224-3244
FAX 202-22B-0956
iimttd ~tatt'
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
INTE T: MAILGllANS@GRAWS. SENATE. GOV
20 1 3 SECONtl AVENUE NORTH
ANOKA. MN 55303
PH. 612-427-5921
FAX 612-427-BB72
JOINT ECONOMIC
June 24, 1997
Mr. Edwin E. Cain
Intergovernmental Affairs
City of Stillwater
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
DearMr..Cain:
I ;m~writing to further update you on federal aid to Minnesota
flood areas. I appreciate yotlri1'lterestand concerns on this
important issue.
Last week the Congress and the President finally accepted a
compromise proposal that I offered earlier in the week to ensure
final passage of emergency flood relief for the people of
Minnesota and North and South Dakota.
My compromise called for separate votes on the emergency disaster
bill and on legislation to protect the American people from a
government shutdown. Last week's vote and the President's
signature confirms this was the best way to facilitate the bill
so Minnesotans can receive all flood relief as quickly as
possible. At the same time, Minnesotan's will be guaranteed a
vote on the government shutdown provision that~will keep flood
relie~ and other needed government programs funded throughout the
rebuilding period.
Minnesotans have been waiting patiently for Washington to stop
talking about a bill and finally do something about it. They
waited for Congress and the President to woik together to finally
bridge the gap that led to the original veto that held up flood
relief. I am pleased that my proposal accomplished that goal.
Now Minnesotans can use the funds in this bill to rebuild their
communities. Congress and the President responded to our request
to provide $500 million in the Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program. It will provide $250 million this year in
additional CDBG funds and another emergency advance appropriation
of $250 million for next year. Language was added to ensure a
substantial portion of this funding would be spent in Minnesota
and the Dakotas. These funds will be used by communities in the
rebuilding effort that are not otherwise covered by FEMA.
Following an overwhelming floor vote, my language to allow easier
access to bank loans in the disaster areas also became law.
There were also additional provisions in the emergency flood
relief bill to aid flood victims, including $3.3 billion of new
funding for FEMA, $585 million for the Army Corps of Engineers,
PREPARED. PUBLlSIIED. AND MAILED AT TA.\:PA YER EXPENSE.
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Page 2
June 24, 1997
.
$70 million for the Emergency Conservation Program, $166 million
for other watershed and flood prevention efforts, $52.2 million
for Economic Development Administration assistance, $650 million
for highway repairs, $18 million for the Agricultural Credit
Insurance Fund, and $18.9 million for the Federal Railroad
Administration. All of these programs will aid flood victims.
The flood aid means more than just dollars. It sends a message
to,M~nnesotans who have endured so much pain that they won't be
forgotten by Washington.
The work does not end with last week's vote. We must ensure that
the recovery and rebuilding does not get delayed by further
gridlock in Washington.
That is why I believe that Congress must pass the "Government
Shutdown Prevention Act," which will protect Minnesotans from a
government shutdown as we rebuild our state from the damages
caused by the flood. Under my proposal, which we adopted last
week, we can have that vote, free from any delays, and give the
people of Minnesota that important assurance.
.
This has been a stressful time for individuals, farmers,
families, and businesses in Minnesota. While there was still
money available for FEMA and CDBG assistance, there was a
perception that funds were being withheld. Therefore, I am
pleased that my compromise was successful. with the agreement
last week, we've provided the necessary funding so Minnesotans
can rebuild their communities knowing they won't have to face a
manmade disaster in the form of a government shutdown.
~he thoughts and opinions of fellow Minnesotans are of paramount
~mpcrtance to my work in the uuited States Senate. Please stay
in touch.
Sincerely,
Rod Grams
United States Senator
.i
2.
3.
1.
9:00
W ASIDNGTON COUNTY
Dennie C. Hegberg
Oletrlct 1
9:00
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
JULY 15, 1997, 9:00 A.M.
Mery Heue.r
Oletrlct 2
Welly Abrahemeon
Oletrlct 3
Myra Peterson
Oletrlct 4/Chelr
Roll Call
Oeve Engetrom
Oietrlct 5
Consent Calendar
Housing and Redevelopment Authority - James Heltzer, Executive Director
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Rehabilitation Loan Program Funds
..,
4. 9:05'.... Public Works Department - D. Wisniewski, Director
5.
6.
9:20
9:30
8.
9. 9:50
10. 9:55
to
10:55
Request by City of Woodbury for Right In/Right Out Access on CSAH No. 16
General Adminiqration - J. Schug,
County Administrator
Discussion from the Audience
VISitors may share their concerns with the County Board of Commissioners on any item not on the agenda. The Chair will direct the
County Administrator to prepare responses to your concerns. You are encouraged not to be repetitious of previous speakers and to
limit your address to Jive minutes.
Commi~ioner Reports - Comments - Questions
This period of time shall be used ITy the Commissioners to repon to thejWl Board on comminee activities, make comments on matters
of interest and infonnation, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during
this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting.
Board Correspondence
Adjourn
Board Workshop with the Public Works Department
Pavement Preservation Needs and Road Capacity Level of Service on the County
Highway System
...................................................................
Date
July 15
July 15
July 16
-
MEETING NOTICES
Committee
Historic Courthouse
Personnel Committee Meeting
Plat Commission
T~rtation Advisory Board
Housmg and Redevelopment Authority
Metronet
Parks and Open Space
Time
7:00 p.m.
11:00 p.m.
9:30 a.m.
2:00 p.m.
3:00 p.m.
12:00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Location
101 W. Pine - Stillwater
Washington County Government Center
Washington County Government Center
230 E. 5th St. - Mears Park Centre
Washington County Government Center
2324 University Ave. - St. Paul
Washington County Government Center
A.._e 6mning device. are .v.n.blo fOl' u.. in m. County BOIIrd Room.
If you n.ed ..._. dw /D di..bility ", !enguege berri.r, pi.... uII 430-6000 (TDD 439-3220J
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR*
JULY 15, 1997
.
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY
ITEM
Administration
A. Approval of Geographic Information System Interim Data and Cost Sharing
agreement between Washington County and Metropolitan Council.
Auditor-Treasurer
B. Approval of abatement applications for homestead classification, value changes,
waste fees and special assessments.
County Attorney.
C. Approval of resolution denying Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning
request submitted by Scott Roberts and Penny Sue Roberts.
Public Works
D. Approval of resolution authorizing the County Engineer to establish a "No
Parking" zone on CSAH 12 adjacent to the Gateway Trail entrance in the City
of Grant and to erect and maintain the appropriate signing.
E. Approval of resolution awarding the bid for crackseal on various County roads
to Daffinson Asphalt Maintenance in the amount of $49,500 conditioned upon
the execution of a contract as approved by law.
.
*Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved
in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action.
.