HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-06 CC Packet
'e
REVISED AGENDA **
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 99-7
Council Chamben, 216 North Fourth Street
April 6, 1999
REGULAR MEETING
RECESSED MEETING
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.
4:30 P.M. AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
STAFF REPORTS
1. Finance Director
2. Police Chief
3. Public Works Director
4. CommunIty Dev. Director
5. Parks & Recreation
6. City Engineer
7. City Clerk
8. Fire Chief
9. Building Official
10. CIty Attorney
11. CIty Coordinator
OTHER BUSINESS
1 Workshop With Washmgton County Dept of Transportation and Physical Development to discuss
County Rd 12/15 intersection Improvements
2. Tom Schwietz, Director Graffiti Teen Center - Request for funding for skateboard park
"
. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
7:00 P.M. AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 16, 1999, Regular Meeting and Executive Session
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
1. Commendation of Don Valsvik for service on the Charter Commission and Planning Commission
2. Doug Johnson, Washington County Attorney - overview of County Attorney's office services
3. Edith Gruber - pathway from Gilbert Court to Lily Lake Elementary School
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum IS a portion of the Council meetIng to address Council on subjects which are not a part of the
meetmg agenda The Council may take action or reply at the tune of the statement or may give drrectlon to staff
regardmg mvestlgatlOn of the concerns expressed
'.
CONSENT AGENDA *
1. Resolution 99-79: Directing Payment of Bills
2. Contractors Licenses: Fogerty Excavating, Inc., Roberts WI; Hi-Tech SIgnS, Stillwater; Adolfson &
Peterson, Inc., Minneapolis; Universal Signs, Inc , St. Paul;
3. Temporary on-sale liquor license and exempt permit for gambling- Church of St. Michael, 7/24/99
4. Resolution: Full-time employment of John Buckley as Assistant Building Inspector
5. Temporary on-sale liquor license - Valley Chamber Chorale at Historic Courthouse, Dec. 10-12,
1999; May 12-14,2000; and Dec. 8-10,2000.
6 3.2% temporary on-sale lIcense - Dan King, softball tournament at Lily Lake Park, 4/23-25/99
City Council Meeting 99-7
I April 6, 1999
'\
"
(consent agenda continued)
.
7. Begjn process for filling Engineering Techmcian II Position
8 Res9lution' Adopting emergency response policy - Fire Department I
9 Resolution: Part-time employment of Michael Wliitaker and Stephen Hansen' as police officers
10 Res9lution: Reapportionment of special assessments, approval of abatements~ approval of refund
for LI' 308 on Parcel #29.030.20.12.0038, #29.030.20120039, and #29030.2012.0040
11 Resolution. Part-time employment of Robert Hamble for park security services- Parks Dept.
12. 3.2~ temporary on-sale license - John LaVenture, softball tournament at Lily ,Lake Park, May 7-9,
1999
13 Commending Katherine Francis for service on the Heritage Preservation Cominission
14. Resolution. Accepting proposals of Bailey Construction for installation ofligl;J.ting, pergola and
pavers in PIoneer Park (
15. Purchase of picnic shelters for Lily Lake play area,.Meadowlark Park, and Northland Park, swmg set
and small play equipment for Lily lake Park; and drinkIng fountain and grills for Ramsey/Grove
Park ,
16 Authorization to solicit quotes for basketball court in Meadowlark Park
17 Resolution: Approving revised pay equity Hay point value system
18 Purcpase of two computers - FIre Dept
19. Authorize beginmng promotional process for part-time assistant fire chief ,
20 Resolution' Approving 1999-2001 labor agreement with AFSCME Council 114
21 Resolution Amending position descnption and salary of Rose Holman to Administration
Support/MIS Specialist .
22. Resolution: Approving amended Central St Croix Joint Cable CommunIcatIOn Commission Joint
and Cooperative Agreement I
23 Setting reimbursement rate for transporting ammals to ammal shelter at $25 for one and $35 for two
24 Resolution Autho71zmgJomt appllcatlDn With Washmgton County Soli and Water ConservatIOn
Dlstf;ct for State Cost Share Special Project Grant for Lake Street Ravme
I ,
,
PUBLIC HEARINGS I
1. Casel No. SUB/99-6. Now IS the time for the public hearing to consider a request from Kenneth
Gervais, K & T No St Paul Investments, LLC, for a,minor subdIviSIOn of Lots 9 & 10, Blk 17,
Holcombe's 2nd Addition, subdivIding one 15,000 square foot lot into two SIngle family lots (50' x
ISO' hr 7,500 square feet) at 711 South Greeley Street in the RB, Two Family ResidentIal District.
Notige of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on March 26, 1999, and notices mailed
to affected property owners.
2 CaseiNo. SV/99-1O. Now is the time for the public l,1earing to conSIder a reque~t from John M.
Schoenecker for a street vacation for the east 30' x 150' of North First Street from Willow to Poplar
Stre~t. Notice of the hearing was published in the Stillwater Gazette on March 26, 1999, and notIces
mailed to affected property owners I
,
3 Case,No ZAT/99-1. Now is the time for the public hearing to consider a zoning ordinance text
amendment establishing tree protection regulations requiring licensing of comrp.ercial tree trimmers,
protecting SIgnificant and heritage trees, establishing tree replacement or payment for removal of
trees. City of Stillwater, applicant Notice of the hearing was published in the ~tillwater Gazette on .
March 26, 1999.
2
.
.
.
'-
.
City Council Meetlng 99-7
April 6, 1999
(public hearings continued)
4 Case No. ZAT/99-3. Now is the time for the public hearing to consider a zoning text amendment
requiring specIal building setbacks for arterial, collectors and raIlroad tracts. City of Stillwater,
applicant. Notice of the hearing was published In the Stillwater Gazette on March 26, 1999.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 McKusIck Lake Management Plan
2 Second reading of ordinance implementing the conflict of interest and finanCIal disclosure provisions
of the Stillwater City Charter (fust readIng February 2, 1999)
NEW BUSINESS
1. Renewal of dock permits - St. Croix Boat and Packet
2 Proposal for McKusIck Lake Downstream Conveyance System Study
3. 1999 Street Improvements, Project 9902 - Approving plans and specifications and ordering
advertisement for bids (Resolution)
4 Market Place Surface Water Management Study
5. Request for Funding for Brown's Creek Stleam RealIgnment
PETITIONS. INDIVIDUALS. DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS (continued)
COMMUNICATIONS/REOUESTS
1. Juhanne FIedler, representing Marina Development, Inc., - Mulberry POInt parcel purchase
2. National League of Cities - 1999 Action Agenda defining federal priorities
COUNCIL REOUEST ITEMS
STAFF REPORTS (continued)
ADJOURNMENT
* All Items hsted under the consent agenda are conSIdered to be routIne by the CIty Council and wIll be enacted by one
motIon There WIll be no separate dIScussIon on these Items unless a CouncIl Member or CItIzen so requests, in WhIch
event, the Items wIll be removed from the consent agenda and conSIdered separately
** Items m Itahcs are additIons to the agenda
3
j
""
~
.
.
7 &tillwater Yacht Club
HPRII &, IIII
IIIJ. ap BIJIIIMHIJER
GIIJ. GaDIIGl1
BIJIIIMHIJER, .11. 55D82
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN.
Manna Development Inc., (dba Stillwater Yacht Club) IS requesung
a license to Install a fuel hne and transIuon sump on Mulberry POInt
TIus IS needed to hook up WIth our eXlsung fuel hne that IS feedmg
the gas dock. Just west of our gas dock entrance
We have an urgent reason for requesting this; we would hke to keep
the fuel hne out of boat traffic areas to eliminate the potentIal for fuel
rupture We have asked the city to start proceedmgs for the purchase
of thIs land, and we would apprecIate a hcense grant untIl thIS
purchase takes place.
We are expectIng to hook up thIS transIuon WIthin the next week and a
half or two weeks, and we would apprecIate your prompt attenuon to
thIS matter.
Enclosed IS a map of the proposed transition
Smcerely,
~
Scott Olson '-
Director of Operations
422 E. Mulberry Street · RD. Box 231 · Stillwater, MN 55082 · (651) 439-5658
)
.
I
/
.
r-
"
---------L
oaci-
~" "
l'
, .
.......
"/I
:to!!
-~
-,..
Z
I
So 1.0. Leo
::-....----... ~
-. .:'"::::.--,--
.... -=--:..---:----...-
--'
~
.~":..--
-= -.. ........ -::-
----
,
~v
~ >-1'-
...\rJ~ef.> \t5:-'!;o \
"'O~l-"1,..tr~O ,,~-< "" ........1--
.l.~~ ~. ..;0 ~~o ,."!>~O
e;;-~~..... ~ t,....tJ
~....'" -{r..o ~ -(
~ ~ ';7J~oJ
It I \,,1 b 1
:'\"
t3)
T;;... ~ _ '.1 I
-V"lrtcr, 57
!VI u./
r+
.
~
~-$-.~ I
'O~"~-
- - C'-~-;-1
-- '--- - v-"~'. .
.. - - ----- ---
- ~-:- -----
--:::---.
----- --
.
~
~
\\ f)O .
II ....
-"""~ .~1- \ ~
L~~ .. d. d-
~:;:o ','::" J -. ~
~() - I~
ood-(' _-
p.~1-\
tlO
'fo a
. I ~
\ -
,,\.E
sO
.
.
.
Memorandum
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Modi Weldon, City Clerk
Date:
April 1 , 1999
Subject:
June 15, 1999, Council Meeting Time Change
The League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference begins Tuesday evening, June 15. In
order to allow Council member attendance, it is recommended the 7 P m. regular meeting be
rescheduled to begin at 4:30 p.m. All business would be conducted at this meeting and no
meeting would be reconvened at 7 p.m.
Action recommended:
Resolution rescheduling the June 15 council meeting from 7 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., with no
meeting reconvened at 7 p.m.
. MEMORANDUM
.
.
To Mayor and CIty CouncIl ~~
From' DIane Deblon, Fmance Drrector
Date: 4/2/99
Subject. End of Year 1998 Budget DetaIl
Attached for your reVIew are the detaIled budget vs. actual worksheets as of December 31, 1998
for the general fund, special revenue funds and the enterpnse funds. The reports show detailed
!me-Item totals for revenues and expendItures by department.
For your mformatIon, the total general fund revenues were $7,292,872.17 and expenditures
totaled $6,892,878.81. This means that the general fund balance mcreased by approxunately
$400,000. The increase in fund balance was made poSSIble due to the sale of CIty property to
Lakeview HOspItal In the amount of $634,908.62.
Also, for your InformatIon, total mterest earmngs generated from mvestrnent transactions by the
FInance Department amounted to $844,547 14 for the 1998 year.
If the Councll desrres any addItIonal information pnor to the Issuance of the annual financial
report, please feel free to contact me The Fmance Department IS in the process of preparing the
financial report and we are plannmg on presentlng the report to Council at the June 1, 1999 CIty
Council meetlng
~
~
.
.
.
MAGNUSON LAw FIRM
LICENSED IN MINNEsarA AND WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING
333 NOIml MAIN STREET . SUITE #202 . PO Box 438 . STILLWATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE (651) 439-9464 . TELECOPIER (651) 439-5641
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
RICHARD D. ALLEN
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor, City Council and Staff
David T. Magnuson, Stillwater City Attomey~ v/
April 1 , 1999
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Stillwater v. Huntsman
Enclosed is the Report of Commissioners on the Huntsman CondemnatIon. This award is
shghtly higher than our appraised damages, of approximately twenty-four thousand dollars, but
In my VIew, is a reasonable value that does not justify appealIng the award.
The statute provides that if the payment of the award is made within the forty-day appeal period
that we obtain a waiver of appeal from the property owners. I have made that offer to them and
have not yet had a reply.
Alternatively we are obligated, if an appeal is taken, to voluntarily pay up to seventy-five percent
of the award pending the appeal. I will keep the Council informed on these matters, as well as
the results on the neighboring Larson property. In the Larson matter, the Commissioners have
not yet heard evidence as to damages.
DTM/tm
Enclosure
1-
J
~w
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DISTRICT COURT
.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRli'T
------------------------------------------------
Case Type: CondemnatIon
Dlstnct Court File No :C5-98-3829
CIty of StIllwater.
Petitioner.
vs.
REPORT OF COMMISSIONERS
Robert J. Larson and Jean H. Larso~
husband and wife. and
James R. Huntsman and Zenith Annette
Huntsman. husband and wife. and
Washangton County. a Minnesota
Political Subdivision.
Respondents.
------------------------------------------------
.
IN THE MA ITER OF THE CONDEMNATION BY
THE CITY OF STILLWATER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
IN THE TOWN OF STILLWATER FOR THE PURPOSE
OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF A CITY PARK
fO 1 HE ABOVE NAMED
The undersigned commissioners appointed by thIS Court in the above entItled action by
Order of the Court dated October 6. 1998 do hereby report as follows'
I.
That we met at the tIme and place appointed by this Court and severally took the oath
pre~crl bed by law
.
;.
~
.'
.
.
~(Q)[P)W
11
That after we gave written notlCf' 0 the respondents, we then viewed the premises
described In the Petition. Upon wntten notice being given to the persons interested. we held
public hearmgs at the Stillwater City Hall, Minnesota, and heard the persons interested who
appeared and asked to be heara.
III.
We have appraised the value of the lands so proposed to be taken and the damage~
sustained by the Respondents, James R. Huntsman and Zenith Annette Huntsman, by reason of
the taking thereof. and the same are as follows:
Condemnation Parcel No 2 (Huntsman Parcel)
Amount
Interested Parties
James H. Huntsman
and
Zenith Annette Huntsman
husband and wife
)
)
)
)
$~OO?~
.
Appraisal Fee:
Total Award:
$ 5rJo. t1E-
$ .:b 5fV). '!2.-
,
IV.
We further report that in the performance of our duties as commissioners we were
occupied for
days and traveled
miles. See attached voucher for individual
claims
2
~(Q)[pJW
Dated this d19!J!. day of /llA'?u} .19?1
~~
. 1- Jt4t.~-
T. Kenna. ommissioner
3
(
~
~.
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
MAGNUSON LAw FiRM
LICENSED IN MINNESOTA AND WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING
333 NORm MAIN STREET. SUITE #202. PO Box 438. STn.LWATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE (651) 439-9464 . TELECOPIER (651) 439-5641
DAVID T. MAGNUSON
RICJlARD D. ALLEN
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor, City Council and Staff
FROM: David T. Magnuson, Stillwater City Attomey~V
DATE. March 23, 1999
SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance VIOlations
I enclose a page from our City Code dealing with enforcement of VIolations of the Sign
OrdInance The Code proVIdes that thirty (30) days after written notice to the record owner of
the property, the City may proceed to abate and remove the violation and If necessary, assess the
cost against the lot or parcel where the violation was located
I am writing because of the Victonan Bwlding Signage. I enclose copies of memoranda
and correspondence between Susan Fitzgerald and my office, and between my office and the
owners of the Victorian Building. It is apparent from Sue Fitzgerald's last contact that the
owners have dug in their heels and do not wish to remove their sign. Even though, the Code
provides for abatement action it should be something that the City Council specifically
authorizes since it will involve bringing a civil action against the offending owner. If the
ordinance is enforceable the City should also be able to recover the costs associated with
bringing the action from the Building Owners.
Since the Rentage PreservatIon CommiSSIon and the Planning Department would hke to see
action on this violation, I ask whether the City Council would authonze thIs abatement action?
DTM/tm
Enclosure
i 31-1
~
~
STILLWATER CODE
.
b. Area. A directory sign may have max-
imum area on one square foot for
each busmess listed on the sign and
four square feet for the name of the
building or complex.
Co Size. Directory signs may be free-
standing but may not exceed 6'12 feet
in height.
d. Use. A directory sign may only be
used for directions and identifica-
tion.
(11) Automobile seroice statIOn S1.gns. Automo-
bile service stations may have one wall
sign and one ground sign, subject to the
following conditions:
a. Wall st.gns. There may be no more
than one wall sign with a maximum
. sign area of one square foot for each
linear foot of building frontage.
b. Freesta.nd.1.T1.I signs. There may be no
more than one freestanding sign for
each principal building. A freestand-
ing sign may be set back 15 feet from
the front and side property line. A
freestanding sign may not project
higher than 20 feet as measured
from grade or contain more than 65
square feet of signage.
c. Serou;e bay and island 1.denti/icatzon
signs. Service bay and island identi-
fication signs are permitted provid-
ing direction or instruction to per-
sons using the facility but containing
no advertIsing material.
(12) Special sign height Um1.ts. Because of the
character of the area, including existing
and proposed land use, special sign height
limits for freestanding signs are required
for certain streets as follows:
a. Curve Crest Boulevard from South
Greeley to Washington Avenue and
Orleans from Washington Avenue to
County Road Five, six feet.
b. County Road Five from HIghway 36
to CrolXWood Boulevard and South
Greeley from Orleans to Highway
36, 20 feet.
CD31:76
Co Washington Avenue from Tower to
Orleans Street, six feet.
(13) Nonconformmg uses. Nonconforming signs
that are unlawful on December 20, 1988,
have rights outlined in subdivision (9) of
this section with respect to their alter-
ation, extension, restoration and abandon-
ment. Any person violating or failing to
comply with any provision of this subdi-
vision will, upon conviction, be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
.
(14) Vwlations. IfviolatioDS of this subdivision
are unabated 30 days after written notice
to the record owner of the property on
which the sign is located, the city may
proceed to abate and remove the violation
and, if deemed necessary, to have cost
thereof specially assessed against the lot
or parcel where the violation was located. \
0.764,8-4-92; Ord. No. 690, 2-7-89) ~
Subd.27. Grading perTTUts.
(1) Enumerat1.on of actIOns requiring. No per-
son may undertake, authorize or permit
any of the following actions without first
having obtained a grading permit from
the city:
a. Any excavating, grading, filling or
other change in the earth's topogra-
phy resultIng in the movement of
more than 50 cubic yards of mate-
rial, except in any designated
wetlands, floodplain or shoreIand dis-
trict;
b. Any excavating, grading or filling or
change in the earth's topography in
any designated wetlands, floodplain
or shoreland district;
c. Any mining operation for gravel or
other materials; or
d. Any changing of a natural
drainageway or drainage pattern that
results in increasing or intensifying
the flow of surface water upon adja-
cent property.
(2) Act1.v1.tz.es not reqU1.nng. Notwithstanding
subsection (1) of this subdiVIsion, no grad-
.
.
'4
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Magnuson
FROM: Sue Fitzgerald ~
DJ\11E: ~h18,1999
SUBJECT: Victorian Building Signage
Dave, you asked me to send you a memo about my phone call from Mr. John Harvey. He
informed he received a letter from you dated March 12, 1999. He said he called to tell '
me he has no intention of going through the City approval process for his signs, nor does
he intend to remove them.
I received another call on my message service. This call was also from Mr. Harvey. He
said he wanted me to have the proper spelling of all three owners, so when I sent out the
ulittle" misdemeanors I won't "screw it up". The other owners of the building are Joseph
Harvey and Scott Woodruff.
If you have any more questions, call me at 430-8822. Thanks
MAGNUSONLA\VFmM
.
LICENSED 11~ MINNESOTA A:\"D "ISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BUILDING .
333 NORTH M.w. STREET. SUITE #202 . PO Bo~ 438. STILLWATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE (651) 439-9~6~ . TELECOPIER. (651) 439-5641
D -\\"ID T. MAGNUSO~ RICHARD D. ALLE="
March 12, 1999
Mr. John Harvey
Mortgages Unlimited, Inc.
109 E. Myrtle Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
RE: Victonan Building Signage
Dear John,
.
I receIved a memorandum from the CIty that you have not yet applied to the City for
either deSIgn approval or Varlance for your Signage for the Victorian Building I thought when
we last talked you wanted to address this in a constructive way. Evidently, the Planning Office
in the Historic Preservation Commission are not willing to just forget about this It would be
best to contact Sue Fitzgerald, the City Planner in charge of signs directly at 430-8822. I am sure
she will find a way to address this problem and help you through the process. If you have any
questions about this, please call me.
.
.
,
,
Yours very truly,
David T. Ma son
Stillwater City Attorney
DTMltrn
Enclosure
ce' Sue FItzgerald
.
\
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
-
To: Dave Magnuson
Fr: Sue Fitzgera1d~
Date: March 8, 1999
- - .
Re: Sign Violation - John Harvey
Dear Dave:
You asked me to inform you after the March Heritage Preservation meeting whether or
not Mr. Harvey applied for design approval for the signs at 109 East Myrtle Street. He
did not apply for the March HPC meeting. He also did not apply to the Planning
Commission for a variance for the second sign he has installed at the above address. If I
can supply any more information, let me know at 430-8822. Thank you.
Attached:
December 7,1998 letter
"
"
~
S S&l{ ,
MAGNUSONLAWFmM
LICENSED IN l\IL'"XESOTA A.'D WISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE Bt.'ILDING
333 NORTH MAIN STREET . SUITE il'10~ . PO Bo"( 438 . STILLWATER. MN 55082
TELEPHO~E (651) 439-9-l6-l . TELECOPIER (651) 439-5641
.
D~\"ID T. MAGNUSO~
RICHARD D. ALLEN
:.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sue Fitzgerald. Stillwater City Planner
FROM'
David T Magnuson, StIllwater City Attorney
DATE:
January 25, 1999
RE:
Victonan BuIlding Slgnage
.
The owners of the Victonan BuIlding contacted me and I tlunk I have them convinced to fill out an
applicatIon With regard to their signage. I told them that I would mall them an application either for a
permit or a varIanCe depending upon wInch way you see this so If you could sent such a document to me
I will send It to them
.-
They brought up the ISSUe of pre-eXlStIng rights in one sign that has been alongside the building for many
years. We should check the date oftlus sign ordinance to see whether there IS anytlung to thIS clann
The second ISsue has to do With safety They feel that hanging a sign over the SIdewalk gives people an
opponumty to recognize their buIldmg commg down the hIll and therefore It IS less dangerous. WIthout
a SIgn perpendIcular to the street, many people go by the buIlding and then hIt the brakes Stay in touch
on this and I dunk we are makmg some headway.
DTM/tm
.
,
.
.
.
551,'/
MAGNUSON LAw FIRM
LICENSED IN MI~1\"ESOTA AND \\ ISCONSIN
THE DESCH OFFICE BCILDING
333 NORTH MAIN STREET . SUITE #~02 . P.O Bo'\. 438 . STILL""'ATER, MN 55082
TELEPHONE (651) 439-9464 . TELECOPIER (651) 439-5641
D.\."ID T. MAC;-"USO~
RICHARD D. ALLEN
January 15, 1999
Mr. John Harvey
The Victorian Building
109 East Myrtle Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Dear John:
I am writing to you as part of my duties as the Stillwater City Attorney. Susan Fitzgerald, the
City Planner has contacted me and asked for my assistance in seeking your compliance with the
City Sign Ordinance. She explained that she has already talked to you about the problem and
that you expressed an unwillingness to comply. I too am a businessman and I am aware of the
resistance in the business community to Municipal control of signage. No businessman is happy
about the rules and expenses associated with following the rules. Unfortunately, part of what
makes Stillwater unique is the Cale that is taken to assure that all exterior facades and signage are
in keeping with the historical image of our City.
I would be happy to talk about this with you since there are several approaches. The best
approach would be to ask the Heritage Preservation Commission to allow you to keep your
signage. It is possible that they might grapt a variance and they often are very helpful in teaching
people about signage that many times enhances the appearance of their property. Please let me
know about your plans.
Yours very truly,
, ---rv1,~
- I
D:vid T. Magn on
Stillwater City Attorney
DTM/tm
December 7, 1998
Dear Dave:
,
.
On Monday, December 7, 19981 received a call that a business at 109 East Myrtle St.
(The Victorian Building) had two signs for tl1e same business. The company, Mortgages
Unlimited, is owned by 10hn Harvey. 1 called Mr. Harvey to tell him that maybe he
didn't realize it, but he had more signs than what's permitted byJhe sign ordinance.
Also, that all exterior lBcades and signage is required to be"reViewed by the HPC. Mr.
Harvey proceeded to tell me tbat he knew everything 1 toid him. He said he would put up
as many signs as it takes, and he didn't care about Stillwater, what other people are
required to do, that he only cared about himseIL He said he paid thousands of dollars on
taxes and he'd do as he pleased. Then he told me to "sue him" and hung up.
I'm not sure there is more 1 can do. 1 would like to get your advice, or is this something .
you should proceed with?
Thanks,
~o
Sue Fitzgerald
Planner
.
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
,
.
.
.
FlPR-06-1999 11:02
WASH CTY PUBLI C WCRKS
6124304350 P.02~0~
CSAH 12/CSAH 15 Intersection Improvement
City of Stillwater
Cost Participation based on current County Cost Participation
Guidelines:
1 . Turn lanes into development at Rutherford Road and proposed
Settler's Way (previous agreement)
2. 50 percent of the following construction items: shoulders,
concrete curb and gutter, and concrete median
3. * *Turn lanes into annexation property in NE quadrant
4. A percentage of general construction items (mobilization, traffic
control, field office and erosion control) based on their
participation for the above construction items
5. A percentage of wetland mitigation, design engineering and
construction engineering based on their participation in the
above contract items.
6. ~ or * * ~ power and street lighting for the traffic signal
Preliminary Estimated Costs (**including NE quad. annex. area)
(1 )$140,000 + (2&4)$41,000 + (3)$35,000
+ (5)$54,000 = $270,000
(6)$200/year or $400/year
04106/99 ..oull.n\word\ 1215\ccst penloipatlon end schedule
APR-06-1999 11:02
WASH Cry PUBL I C WCRKS
6124304350 P.03/04
,
CSAH 12/CSAH 15 Intersection Improvement
Preliminary Estimated Project Cost .
Revised 416/99
Construction Cost
Design/Construction Engineering
(estimated 26 percent of construction costs)
Total Project Costs
$1 . 1 million
$275,000
-
$1 .4 million
Cost .Breakdown by Participating Community
Total
Construction
$872,000
$216,000
$1 2,000
$1,100,000
Engineering
$ 21 7 ,000
$54,000
$4,000
$275,000
Total
$1,089,000
$270,00.
$16,000
$1,375,000
Participant
County
Stillwater
Grant
it it Assuming NE qUldrant annexed into City of Stillwater
Cost Participation estimates blsed on current County Cost Participation Guidelines
04106/99 ...wllll'\\word\1215\cost ~.l'tIClplltion and len,dUII.
\
.
.
APR-~-1999 11:03
WASH CTY FUBLI C W!::RKS
6124304350 P.04/04
CSAH 1 2/CSAH 15 Intersection Improvement
Schedule
(revised 3/25/99)
Informational meetings with representatives from
Stillwater, Stillwater Township, and Grant
Dee 1 998
County Board Workshop
Feb 2, 1999
Neighborhood Meeting
Feb 23, 1999
Local Meetings
March/April 1999
County Board Workshop
May 4, 1999
Coordination and Approval of Preliminary Plans
and Cost Participation June/July 1999
Final Plans and Specifications October 1 999
Let Construction Project January 2000
Commence Construction Early Spring 2000
. 04106189 . cullen\word\ 1215\ooat pel1lCllpltlon ,nd sc:hec:lul.
TOTAL P.04
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FR: CIty Coordinator
RE: Request for Skateboard park
facility funding
DA: April 2, 1999
Discussion:
Mr. Tom Schwietz, Graffiti Teen Center Director, will be at the 4:30 P.M. portion of the
meeting Tuesday to request funding assistance ($13000) for the creation of a skateboard
park facility. Mr. Schwietz has submitted a memorandum to the Council regarding the
facility and he can explain it in more detail at the meeting.
The Park and Recreation Commission supports the requests and suggested that the City
use Park Dedication funds for the facilities. Mr. Magnuson will be giving you an opinion
as to whether or not Park Dedication funds can be used for this purpose.
Recommendation:
Council consider funding assistance for a skateboard park facility.
~~
134/81/1999 13:89 61243911349
VSB
FAGE 132
April 1, 1999
TO: Mayor Jay Kimble and City Council
City of Stillwater
FR: Tom Schwietz, Director Graffiti Teen Center
RE: Brier Stillwater Skate Park Summary and Request for Funding
.Summer of 1997, temporary skatepark located across from Gaunon'. Auto was
closed at the end or summer due to liability issues/CODcerns by City officials.
"May 1998. Graffiti skate park opened at a cost of$4448 which included costs of
ramps/contract labor and committee meet.iDgs. The ramps were constructed by
the users UDder the supervision of G.W.Olsen Conal. personnel. The park was
open during Graftiti hours which were Friday" Satwday evenings. The limited
time available for use however did Dot meet the needs of the 125 area skaters who
registered at the time of the park's opening. Graffiti staff met with Parks and Rec.
officials aDd Northland Park was o1fered as an alternative. In June the City paved
the Northland hockey rink. In July, Graftiti closed it's skate park, the ramps
were transported to Northland, and the Northland Park opened.
*Continuou8 complaints trom local neighbors about noise, and constant unneeded
visits by police accompanied by the need for a location for the in.line skaters to go
proved Northland would Dot work. 'lbe ramps, of which 2 of them weigh over 500#
each, needed to be removed each evening at 6:00 to make room for the in-line
skaters, sometimes with only 3-4 kids around to do this. Another sight was needed. .
.
*Graffiti staff met with Parks and Rec:. seeking another location Nothing is avail-
able.
-*
-Graffiti meets with Dick Olsen who agrees to lease his warehouse to Graffiti for
an indoor skate park(opened 2115199}. The users once again constructed the ramps
for the park and assisted in getting the area ready. The lease for the 8]Jace is $1 per
month for the first 4 months and $1150 month thereafter. Dick also agrees to pave
and fence in an outaide area connecting the iuBide and outside park in June. Total
area for the Ibte park is app. 6400 sq. ft. Graffiti is responsible for the area.
*Indoor park curreutly is open 4: days per week. Cost is $2 per session or $20 for a
month pass. However, DO one is turned away because of no money. Once school is
out, the skate park will be open 1-9 seven days per week. All Graffiti staft" time has
been in-1dncJ to thU point.
* March 22, Graftiti &taft" met with the City Parks and Rec. board. The board
recommended at that time to authorize the City to approve Graffiti's request for
$13,000 for the Graffiti skate park.
(Note: Currently, CNer 300 youth participate in the programs at Graftiti each
weekend)
.
,,- ..
~
~
. REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 99-6
March 16, 1999
7:00 P.M.
The meetlng was called to order by Mayor Kunble
Present
Also Present
Councllmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kunble
CIty CoordInator Knesel
CIty Attorney Magnuson
Commumty Development DIrector Russell
FInance DIrector Deblon
CIty Engmeer Eckles
FIre ChIefKallestad
Police ChIefDauffenbach
AdministratIon Secretary Holman
Press
Julie Kink, Couner
Mark Brouwer, Gazette
MotIon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Zoller to approve the minutes of the
March 2, 1999, Regular and Recessed Meetings.
PETITIONS, INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS & COMMENDATIONS
.
1 JIm Kolb, Valley TranSIt - CertIficate of AppreCIatIon (accompanied by Dave Chnstianson-
Metropohtan Councll).
Mayor Kunble presented a plaque to JIm Kolb, Valley Transit, in appreCIatIon of his significant
contnbutIon of over 23 years of personable and reliable transit ServIce for the St. Croix Valley.
Dave ChnstIanson, MetropolItan Councll was also present to commend Mr. Kolb for his many
years of extraordInary ServIce to the commumty and the regIon.
STAFF REPORTS
Council receIved a letter from CIty Planner Fitzgerald regardmg the Heritage PreservatIon
CommiSSIon. She stated that Katherme FranCIS has resigned from the Hentage Preservation
COmmISSIOn, thereby bnngIng the number of members down to seven as stated in the City Code
Therefore, the Heritage PerservatIon COmmISSIOn will not be filling the vacancy.
FIre ChIef Kallestad requested approval to purchase a replacement defibrillator. The current
defibnllator that the FIre Department has IS broken. The cost to repaIr the old machine would not be
worth the expense SInce the technology has Improved SInce It was purchased The cost for a new
machIne would be $2959 from PhysIo-Control Corporatlon. ThIs money IS not In the 1999 budget.
MotIon by Councilmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Bealka adoptlng Resolution 99-77
apprOVIng the purchase of a defibrillator from PhysIO-Control CorporatIon at a cost of $2959 plus tax.
.
Ayes. CouncIlmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Nays: None
!
~
CIty EngIneer Eckles Informed Counc1l that street sweepIng would begIn In the next day or two
The downtown areas and around the lakes w1l1 be swept first m an effort to catch debns before It IS
dtscharged Into the lakes and nver There WIll be two sweepers untll summer, one all summer and .
then two sweepers In the fall to catch leaves.
Mayor KImble noted that he receIved a letter of commendatIon for the work done by FIre Chlef
Kallestad In resolVIng a vanance Issue Mayor KImble complimented Mr Kallestad on a Job well
done and requested that CIty CoordInator Knesel place the letter In Mr Kallestad's personnel file
CONSENT AGENDA
CIty Coordmator Knesel requested that HI-Tech SIgns Inc be removed from Item 2, Contractors
LIcense untIl necessary paperwork has been receIved.
Counc1lmember Bealka requested that Item 13, Request to begm hinng process for an AsSIstant
Bu1ldtng Inspector be removed from the Consent Agenda for further dtscussIOn
Motlon by Counc1lmember Thole, seconded by Counc1lmember Bealka approVIng the Consent Agenda,
as amended. All In favor.
1. Resolution 99-65: DIrectlng Payment ofB1lls
2 Contractors LIcenses. HI Teak SIgHS !Be. & GmphIes, Stlllwater; DraWIng Card, MInneapolis,
Gabler Bros PaintIng, StIllwater; Lee Hendnckson Masonry, Inc., StIllwater; Jones SIgn, Green Bay
WI; Wallmaster Home Improvements, St. Paul, C & T SIdmg, Inc , Roberts, WI
3 ApproVIng exemptIon from gamblIng permIt - St. CrOlx Cathohc School raffie .
4 Hang banner on North MaIn Street - LumberJack Days Festival Assoc. for LumberJack Days, July 2
- 25, 1999
5 Request to attend the Annual HIstonc Preservatlon Conference - HIstonc PreservatIon COmmIttee
6 Resolution 99-66: Permanent Employment of Nathan MeredIth - Pohce Department
7 Resolution 99-67: Purchase of a speed wagon - Pohce Department
8. Hang banner on Mam Street at Ohve - St Michaels Church Fun Fest, July 9 - 25, 1999
9 Hang banner on MaIn Street at Obve - St. CrOlx Events for Rtvertown Art FestIval, Apnl 30-May
16, 1999
10. ConcIhatIon Court - authonzatIon for CIty Coordmator to represent CIty
11 Resolution 99-68: EstabhshIng IRS standard m1leage rate as m1leage reImbursement rate
12 Purchase of two software programs for TIcke- Trac automated tlcket wntIng system - Pohce Dept.
13 Rcqtlest to eegm mr.Bg preaess fer ASSlStlHit Bl:lIlwBg lBSf'eeter
14 Resolution 99-69: ApproVIng transfers for CIty share projects
15 Resolution 99-78: Supportlng Repeal of the State Sales Tax for Local Government Purchases
CouncIlmember Bealka questloned the need for hmng an AsSIstant Bu1ldtng Inspector at thIs tIme.
CIty Coordinator Knesel explaIned that the Bu1ldmg OffiCIal WIll be on extended leave, and the
actiVIty of the department has been exceedmg the level of actlVIty for the past 3 or 4 years. The
current Bu1ldIng Inspector IS not able to keep up WIth all the actIVIty assocIated with the Bu1ldIng
InspectIon Department Mr Knesel also stated the new Inspector could perform other code
enforcement actIVItIes, such as fire Inspectlons, SIdewalk snow removal, other nUIsances, etc.,
espeCIally when the constructIon actiVIty slackens .
2
,
Motlon by Councllmember Thole, seconded by Councllmember Cummmgs directlng staff to begm the
hmng process for an AssIstant Bulldmg Inspector
. Ayes Councllmembers Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kmlble.
Nays Councllmember Bealka.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1 ThIs IS the day and tlme for the pubhc hearmg to consIder the extensIon of Lowell Park north to
Mulberry POInt IncludIng playgrounds, pathways, nver observatIon, lightlng, signage, and
landscapIng and the Park and Recreation Grant request Notlce of this heanng was published In the
S tlllwater Gazette March 9, 1999 and notIces maIled to affected property owners.
Commumty Development DIrector Russell explaIned that a publIc heanng IS reqUITed to apply for a
DNR Outdoor RecreatIon Grant. This grant would prOVIde matchmg funds for the project. The park
Improvement for the Mulberry Point area IS pOSSIble because of the extensIon of the levee wall
around Mulberry Point. The Improvements proposed are conSIstent with the levee wall project and
approved Lowell Park Plan.
.
B1l1 Sanders, CIty Parks Consultant from Sanders, Wacker, Bergley, Inc. presented the plans for the
Improvements. These plans consisted of trails, performance area, picmc areas, chlldren's play area,
restroom, hghtlng and landscaping. The estlmated cost of the park lDlprovements is $500,000. One
half of that amount would be paid through the grant, the remaInder by the CIty. The project IS
scheduled to begm m the spnng of 2000 There was discussion regardIng parkIng, boaters and the
area around PD Pappys and the StIllwater Yacht Club Commumty Development DIrector Russell
stated that he would be meeting WIth the owners of PD Pappys and the Stillwater Yacht Club to
dIscuss thIs area in more detail
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
JIm LaskIn, stated that it was good to see thIs project bemg completed. He SaId It was a wonderful
plan and that when completed it WIll be consIdered a great park for a City of this SIze.
The Mayor closed the pubhc hearing.
MotIon by Councilmember Thole, seconded by Councllmember Zoller apprOVIng the Lowell Park
Improvement Plan and adoptlng Resolution 99-70 approVIng the apphcatIOn for the Outdoor RecreatIon
Grant program and authonzmg Commumty Development DIrector Russell to execute the grant.
Ayes: CouncIlmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kmlble.
Nays None
2 ThIS IS the day and tIme for the public hearmg to consIder the purchase of 27 acres of land as part of
the Brown's Creek Nature Area and Parks Project for nature preserve and an outdoor ecologIcal
learnIng area. The land IS located west of Neal Avenue, south of the MInnesota Zephyr railroad
tracks and north of the northerly tnbutary of Brown's Creek Notice of this hearing was pubhshed In
the Stlllwater Gazette March 9, 1999 and notIces maIled to affected property owners
.
3
,
Comrnumty Development DIrector Russell mformed CouncIl that the pubhc heanng IS reqUIred to
apply for the Natural and Scemc Areas Grant Program Mr Russell explaIned that a natural resource
Inventory prepared for the Phase II annexatlon area Identlfied thIs SIte as an excellent area for .
preservatlon. The 27-acre sIte combInes eXIstmg CIty park lands WIth Brown's Creek wetland to
create an 85-acre natural communIty ThIs proposed use In the area would mclude educatIonal,
InterpretatIve and recreatlonal uses A compamon ConservatIon Partners Grant request would
prOVIde money to help restore the SIte through removal of exotlcs, barIng and native plantIngs The
plan has been approved by the Open Space COmmlttee, Parks Board and Plannmg COmmISSIOn
The Mayor opened the pubhc hearIng
There were no requests to be heard.
The Mayor closed the pubhc hearmg.
Motlon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Zoller approvIng the Brown's Creek
Nature Preserve plan and adoptIng Resolution 99-71 approvIng apphcatlon for the Natural and Scemc
Area Grant Program and authonzmg Commumty Development DIrector Russell to execute the grant.
Ayes CouncIlmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor KImble.
Nays' None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1 Update on rehabIhtatlon ofbwlding at 124 N Main (Melton Bwldmg)
.
Comrnumty Development DIrector Russell updated CouncIl on the rehabIhtatlon of the buIldIng at
124 N MaIn. The owner has entered Into a contract WIth a renovatIon expert to restore the bwldIng
The extenor deSIgn plan WIll be reviewed by the HPC on Apnl5, 1999 Construction IS anticIpated
to begm In Mayor June WIth the extenor buIldIng completIon by September, 1999
RIck Igo, HIstonc RenovatIons, Inc , presented the plans for the renovatlon of the buIlding and
answered questIons
MotIon by Councllmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Bealka to stay any condemnatlon
actlons on the Melton BuIldIng, 124 N. MaIn St, untll July 1, 1999 At thIs tlme staff WIll report back
WIth an update on the project All In favor
2. Report from Downtown ParkIng COmmISSIOn regardIng 1999 downtown parkIng Improvements and
program management.
Comrnumty Development DIrector Russell Informed CouncIl that smce the March 2, 1999 meetIng
the Downtown ParkIng COmmISSIOn has met twIce to dIscuss management of the Downtown ParkIng
Program and parkIng lot Improvements for the Sprmg of 1999 The ParkIng COmmISSIOn used a
cost estImate of$100,000 for Improvement of the UBC Lot and $200,000 for the Water Street Lot.
In order to pay for the Improvements, the ParkIng CommISSIon conSIdered extendIng pay parkIng to
other lots as follows: .
4
South Main
River Lot
UBC
24 hrs/7 days a week
24 hrs/7 days a week
Evemngs/W eekends
Olive/Second
Maple Island
Water Street
Evenings/W eekends
Fn Evemngs/W eekends
Evemngs/W eekends
.
The Parkmg ComnnssIon would also hke to extend the contract WIth Impark for a four-year term
(1999-2002) for the ParkIng Management Program Councdmember Thole sug~sted that the
agreement state that Impark be allowed to rmprove lots and keeps the revenues, Instead of the CIty
puttIng the Improvements to the parkIng lots In capItal outlay Mr. Russell stated that Impark had
agreed to do that.
MotIon by Councdmember Thole, seconded by Councllmember Zoller adoptlng Resolution 99-72
approvIng agreement WIth Impark for a 1999-2002 ParkIng Management program, whIch Includes
rmprovements to the UBC and Water Street lots
Ayes: Councdmembers Bealka, Cummmgs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None.
3. AddItIonal mformatIon on Maple Island redevelopment project.
Community Development Director Russell stated that the developers of the Maple Island buildIng
w1l1 need $65,000 ofTIF per year for 10 years or $650,000 for the project to proceed. In order to get
the $65,000 in TIF, staff and the developer have agreed to estabhsh $55,000 floor on the amount of
TIF available up to $65,000 or $650,000 for the term of the distnct. There WIll be no addItIonal
responsIbIhty for payment by the CIty other than the 100 percent of aVaIlable TIF, up to $650,000.
.
The other responsibIhty of the CIty would be to proVIde 50 rmproved parkIng spaces for the grocery
store. ThIs WIll be accomphshed by the recommended parkIng lot rmprovements described earher.
MotIon by Councdmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller adoptIng Resolution 99-73
approvIng the development agreement between the CIty of Stlllwater and the Mainstream Development
PartnershIp for the Maple Island redevelopment project.
Ayes: CouncIlmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays' None.
4 Update: Stlllwater Art and Nature Center request for CIty purchase of the Trolley BuildIng
Community Development DIrector Russell requested authonzatIon to have an appraIsal of the trolley
buildIng prepared. Mr. Russell stated that would gIve the CIty an idea of the amount of money
needed to purchase the buildIng. He also requested that the Fire ChIef and the BuildIng Inspector
reVIew the building to see if there are any fire or bUIlding code issues. This would put staff in a
pOSItIon to descnbe the condItIons and costs of the Trolley Budding, alternatIve methods of
purchase, and present operatIons and staffing mformatIon
.
Motlon by CouncIlmember CummIngs, seconded by CouncIlmember Thole drrectIng the BuildIng
OffiCIal and FIre ChIef to survey the Trolley BUIldIng located at the S.W. comer of Laurel and Owens
Streets and prepare a wntten evaluatlon of the structure and adopting Resolution 99-74 directIng staff to
have a appraisal prepared for the Trolley bUIldIng.
5
Ayes' CouncIlmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor KImble.
Nays None
5 PossIble second readIng of ordInance relatlng to lakeshore fertIlIzer restrIctlons.
(FIrst readIng Feb. 2, 1999)
.
CIty Attorney Magnuson stated that th1s IS the second readIng of an ordInance relatmg to lakeshore
fertIhzer restrIctlons Mr Magnuson stated that he has meet Wlth Ned Gordon, member of the
Browns Creek Watershed DistrIct and water qUalIty experts from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk,
ASSOCIates, as well as local merchants All of the suggestlons made have been Incorporated In the
ordmance The ordInance now relates to all land Wlthm the CIty It reqwres landowners to test theIr
sOIl If they WIll be USIng a fertIhzer contmmng phosphorous to demonstrate the need. It also Includes
a proVISIon reqUlrlng property owners to remove grass clIppIngs or fertIlIzer that IS spIlled upon a
street Mr Magnuson explaIned that even If the ordInance IS passed now, It Wlll not be enforced
untll January 1,2000 In order to gIve ample opportunIty for the publIc to become Informed about the
use of fertIhzer and gIve merchants a chance to stock fertIlIzers that are enVIronmentally frIendly
Mohon by CouncIlmember Bealka, seconded by CouncIlmember Thole adoptlng Ordinance 873 CIty
of StIllwater Pubhc Waters Protectlon
Ayes: CouncIlmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole and Mayor Kimble
Nays' CouncIlmember Zoller
6 LIly Lake proposal for additlonal studIes
CIty EngIneer Eckles requested approval of a proposal by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderhk & Assoc .
(BRA) that would reVIew and reevaluate the water qualIty lIIlprovement alternatlves of LIly Lake.
ThIs proposal would Involve reVlewmg the eXIstlng InformatIon, updahng the watershed model to
Include changes proposed under the Stlllwater Bndge ProJect, the IdentIficatlon and assessment of
other alternatIves and a summary report. The cost would not exceed $12,800 and would be
completed May 31, 1999 ThIs Informatlon would be used to update the feasIbIhty study that would
be presented to CIty CouncIl A pubhc heanng would be ordered
Motlon by CouncIlmember Bealka, seconded by CouncIlmember Thole adoptlng Resolution 99-75
acceptlng the proposal from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderllk & AsSOCIates for reVlew and reevaluatIon of
water quahty lIIlprovements to LIly Lake (project 9613)
Ayes' CouncIlmembers Bealka, CummIngs, Thole, Zoller and Mayor Kimble.
Nays: None
7 POSSIble approval of amended St CrOIX Valley Jomt Cable ComnussIon Agreement
CIty CoordInator Knesel stated SectIon 15 (e) of the St. CrOIX Valley JOInt Cable CommISSIon
Agreement IS proposed to be amended as follows
e The cOImmsSIOn, ItS agents and employees, may engage m lobbymg achVIhes related to the
regulahon of cable communIcatlons only after such actlVlhes, IncludIng related travel, are
approved by a two thIrd (2/3) vote of the cable commISSIon members. The commISSIon may also .
6
submit wntten comments on rules, regulatIons or legislatIon regardIng cable commumcatIon
proposed by or pending before the MCCB, the FCC, and the Minnesota LegIslature or Congress.
.
Motlon by Councllmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Cummmgs apprOVIng the amended
agreement WIth the St. CrOIX Valley Joint Cable COmmISSIOn All In favor.
NEW BUSINESS
1 Request for CIty conSIderatIon of annexatlon and development at 13-acre SIte located at northeast
comer of CR 5/12
CommunIty Development DIrector Russell Informed Councll that the CIty receIved a letter from
Bruggeman Homes to conSIder theIr development of property In the Phase N annexatlon area The
orderly annexatIon agreement allows annexatIon outSIde of deSIgnated phasIng when 100 percent of
the property owner(s) petItIon the CIty for annexatIon and the property IS adjacent to the CIty
boundary CouncIlmember Zoller""suggested that we table thIs diSCUSSIon untllIt is brought before
the JOInt Board Meetlng on Apn114.
MotIon by CouncIlmember Zoller, seconded by Councilmember Thole to table dISCUSSIon of annexatIon
and development at the 13-acre SIte located at the northeast comer ofCR 5/12 untIl after Apn114, 1999
JOInt Board meeting. All In favor.
2. New bndge construction and old Stlllwater bndge removal Impacts and mItlgatIon
.
Commumty Development DIrector Russell mformed Councll that MnDOT IS currently preparing an
amended EnVIronmental Impact Statement for the new bndge based on the Braun Consensus
AlternatIve. Todd ClarkowskI from MnDOT updated Councll on the bndge deSIgn process. Mr.
Russell prOVIded Councll WIth an Impact and MItlgatIon statement for TH 36/STH 96 m the St
CrOIX RIver Crossing ProJect.
MotIon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Bealka adoptlng Resolution 99-76
descnbmg Impact and mitlgatIon of the new trunk hIghway 36/96 St. CrOIX River crOSSIng.
Ayes: CouncIlmembers Bealka, Cummings, Thole, Zoller and Mayor KImble.
Nays: None.
3. Request from Washington County to set up workshop on County Road 12 and 15 mtersectlon
CIty EngIneer Eckles stated that the Washmgton County Department of Transportation and PhYSIcal
Development has requested a workshop on Apnl6, 1999, at 430 p.m to dIscuss intersectIon
Improvements
MotIon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember CummIngs to set a workshop WIth the
WashIngton County Department ofTransportatlon and PhYSICal Development for Apnl 6, 1999 at 4 30
p m to dIscuss Intersectlon improvements. All m favor.
. COMMUNICATIONS/REOUESTS
1 Request for workshop - Charter COmmlSSIOn
7
CIty Councll MeetIng No 99-6
March 16, 1999
CIty CoordInator Knesel stated the members of the Charter COmmISSIOn are requestlng a workshop
to define the role of the CIty CoordInator and clarIfy how that pOSItIon relates to the powers and .
responsIbIhtIes of the Mayor and Councllmembers
MotIon by Councllmember CummIngs, seconded by Councllmember Thole to set workshop WIth
Charter CommIssIon for May 4, 1999 at 4'30 p m. to dIscuss the role of the CIty CoordInator
2 Donald ValsVlk - ResIgnatlon from Planmng COmmlSSIOn and Charter CommIssIon
CIty CoordInator Knesel announced that Don Valsvlk would be retmng from both the Charter
COmrnlSSIOn and the Plannmg COmmISSIon. Mayor Kunble commended Mr Valsv1k on hIs servIce
to the CIty and requested that Mr. Knesel prepare a resolutlon recogmzmg hIs work
Motlon by Councllmember Thole, seconded by Councilmember Zoller dIrectlng staff to prepare a
resolutlon commendIng Don ValsV1k for hIs work on the Charter CommIssIon and the Planmng
CommIssIon for the next meetIng and dIrecting City Attorney Magnuson to detemnne If we can use
preVIOUS apphcatlons to fill the pOSItIon All In favor
COUNCIL REOUEST ITEMS
CIty Attorney Magnuson Informed Councll that he would no longer be representlng Bruggeman
Homes because of a potentlal COnflIct of Interest He also requested consent of the Councll to
represent Steve May and ClasSIC Home DeSIgn, Inc. In negotIatIons and htlgatIon surrounding the
Hunter's RIdge Development In May TownshIp. .
MotIon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Cummmgs grantIng consent to CIty
Attorney Magnuson to represent Steve May and ClasSIC Home DeSIgn All In favor
Councllmember Zoller asked CIty Engmeer Eckles If they would be sealcoatIng streets thIs year.
Mr. Eckles stated that they WIll be and a plan WIll be presented to Councll at a later date.
Councllmember Bealka asked CIty EngIneer Eckles to look mto the water problem WIth path behInd
Llly Lake School.
ADJOURNMENT
MotIon by CouncIlmember Thole, seconded by CouncIlmember Cummmgs to adjOurn at 10.03 p.m. to
executIve seSSIOn to dIscuss labor relatlons negotIatlons
Mayor
Attest.
CIty Clerk
.
8
-- -- - - --- - --- -------
\
CIty Council Meetlng No. 99-6
March 16, 1999
. Resolution 99-65: DirectIng Payment of BIlls
Resolution 99-66: Permanent Employment of Nathan Meredith - Police Department
Resolution 99-67: Purchase of a speed wagon - Pohce Department ,"
Resolution 99-68: EstablishIng IRS standard rmleage rate as mileage rermbursement rate
Resolution 99-69: ApproVIng transfers for CIty share projects
Resolution 99-70: approVIng the apphcatlon for the Outdoor RecreatIon Grant program and
authonzmg Community Development DIrector Russell to execute the grant.
Resolution 99-71: approVIng applIcatIon for the Natural and SCenIC Area Grant Program and
authonzing Steve Russell to execute the grant
Resolution 99-72: approVIng agreement WIth Impark for a 1999-2002 ParkIng Management program,
which includes rmprovements to the UBC and Water Street lots.
Resolution 99-73: approVIng the development agreement between the CIty of Stillwater and the
MaInstream Development PartnershIp~
Resolution 99-74: dIrecting staff to have a appraisal prepared for the Trolley buildIng
Resolution 99-75: acceptIng the proposal from Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderhk & Associates for review
and reevaluatIon of water quality improvements to LIly Lake (Project 9613).
Resolution 99-76: descnbmg rmpass and rmtIgatIon of the new trunk hIghway 36/96 St. Croix RIver
crossing
Resolution 99-77: approving the purchase of a defibnllator from PhYSlo-Control CorporatIon at a cost
of $2959.00 plus tax.
Resolution 99-78: SupportIng Repeal of the State Sales Tax for Local Government Purchases.
. Ordinance 873: CIty of StIllwater Pubhc Waters Protectlon.
.
9
. .
ctCerttftcate of ~>pprectatton
'. .
, .'Pr'~s'ented>to
" .
"
: 'i 4 ",
. ~
, IN APPRECIATION: OF. HIS; ,'S.IGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION
f 'r. l ",",,"
OF OVER 7 YEARS' OF 'DEDICATEDl SERVICE AS A
MEMBER OF THE" STILLWATER CHARTER: COMMISSION
AND OVER 13 YEARS 0F'DEDICATED SERVICE AS A
MEMBER OF'THE STILLWATER PLANNING'COMMISSION
(\ ,f ~..r...t. t, ~ ,} I ~
I I" '\
"\ I, .. t. I ~ ...
i .. , ,I tot.. I
~ f ( \J lit.." fl1\..,.1 .i\lII\,J<,\l.;~BWs,J.... ..4r"~,,
, (,... \~ . .,. I, '\ 1 ~ I '\ ~'f t../W . J.. ~..t .... ...... f > 1 I I ';I
.. ,J~"",.,i ~ 11'I~t'V;\!:~~ "'I#\!\. ,:"11 t II :;,_..
THE/STILL WATER"CITY COUNCIL
I~~'
I ,
, "
\} ,i $" \
AProL'.'6;.: 1999
~~
l
,
.
.
.
Memorandum
Apnl2, 1999
TO: Mayor and CIty CouncIl
FROM: Klayton HEckles
CIty Engmeer
SUBJECT: Drmnage Problem 1034 Gilbert Court
(Edith Gruber)
DISCUSSION:
Attached is a letter from EdIth Gruber of 1034 GIlbert Court requesting the City
to correct a flooding problem along her property and relocate the eXIstIng bike traIl. Note
that EdIth Gruber will be attending the meeting under IndiVIduals and DelegatIons. The
Grubers request that the CIty repaIr the flooding problem along theIr property. In
addItIon, they are askIng that the City remove the bIke path from theIr property. There IS
mdeed a water problem m thIs area However, I draw CouncIl's attentIon to the attached
letter from the Engineering Department that was sent to the Grubers two years ago. As
can be seen In the letter, the floodmg problem that occurs on thIs property IS a dIrect
result of actIons taken by the Grubers themselves. Prior to the Grubers landscaping their
property, the traIl area and neIghbonng property all drained across the back of the
Grubers property and out to the north. There was no flooding on the trail. The Grubers
then proceeded to regrade theIr back yard and build a berm along the traIl to stop water
from flowmg across theIr property.
In 1997 CIty staff receIved complamts from neighbors and the school regardIng
thIs problem. Upon revIewing the problem and the approved grading plan for the
Gruber's lot (before Gruber's landscapIng) we found that landscapIng by the Grubers had
Indeed created the problem. At that time, as shown in the letter, they were instructed to
correct thIs situatIon or the CIty would be forced to take actIon In response to the City's
dIrectIon, the Grubers placed a small plastIc pIpe through the berm that they created to
draIn the water out. However, It appears that this system IS not properly deSIgned and IS
subject to pluggmg and freeZIng m the spring.
Regardmg the trall, thIs trallIS an Important hnk that serves Lily Lake School. It
prOVIdes access for the entire Highlands area to the school. The traIl was m place before
the constructlon of the Gruber's home. A trallway easement was placed on the plat for
thIS property at the tIme the final plat was approved. At the tlme the gradIng plan for the
lot was approved, the dratnage for the lot was reVIewed and the plan did contaIn a
proposed drainage swale that would drain tins area out to the north. Upon completion of
,
,
.
.
.
the bwldmg, the bwlder graded the lot correctly. Sometime after the bwlder had
completed and left the project, the homeowners completed some landscapIng and altered
the back yard.
The current SItuatIon IS definitely not acceptable. It is hazardous to pedestrians, is
causIng damage to CIty property, as well as the neighbors property. The solutIon to tIus
problem would be regrade the lot to its original shape that would allow thIs entire area to
dram as mtended. GIven that the gradmg took place on private property owned by the
Grubers it IS recommended that the Grubers be dIrected to correct the SItuatIon.
March 30, 1999
.f
~
f .
~
Mayor and CouncIL
.
I am wntIng to you today regardIng a contInUOUS problem m our neighborhood This
problem has been gomg on for years and we feel It IS time for somethIng to be done to
correct the sltuatlon
The path leadIng to Ltly Lake Elementary School from Gdbert Court IS continuously
flooded. To correct thIs problem, we would hke the path moved back to Its ongInal spot,
wluch was on City property, and put at a shght angle so that the water runs off the path
Into the storm drains and doesn't pool on the path. As It IS now, the path runs through
our yard and we own footage on the other Side of the path (up to the trees on the other
side of the path), then the city owns footage (where the path was ongmally), then our
neIghbors yard starts.
Tlus Issue has been brought up several tunes and no one IS Wllhng to take responsIblhty
for the problem nor does anyone want to fix It. After having numerOUS concerned parents
come to our house Inqumng about the floodIng problem and haVIng the pohce called to
our house (because someone thought the water was from our home), my husband and I
took It upon ourselves to dIg through our newly sodded yard and put a dramage pipe
through our property so the water had somewhere to go so that the kids and public could
use the path. The matenals, labor, and repaIr to our spnnkler system were at our own
exnense We feel we have done more than our share to try and fix It. The drain works
okay for the summer and fall months, but as you can see m the pictures provided, the pipe .
freezes and the water contInues to accumulate Tlus path has been nothIng but an
Inconvenience and danger for everyone
Here are some reasons the path should be moved and put at an angle
. The water keeps accumulatlng and then It freezes, we feel this is a big
endangerment to chtldren gOing to and from school A cluld could fall
and get hurt on the Ice.
. Children are constantly walkIng on our wall to aVOid the water or Ice. If a
chlld looses their balance and falls Into the water or onto the Ice, they could
get senously Injured
---
-,. iIr" ~
l"'~
"J!"'- -..:
. We have cluldren constantly going through our yard and taking our
landscapIng rocks and thrOWIng them Into the flooded area. Wlule we
personally are not happy With the cIuldren doing that, we also fear someone
could get Iut by a flYing rock
..... ' _ ~ ~ t ..... t - - .",. .....
1~_"~ ,p...... J. .. 1: ~ , .. ~ -+... - ~.... ... ...~... -
_ _ "OI':;"~ _ _ ,.:~"''r -__..,\. ... ~ :-1 -! ...'1-~ -... " (..V" """. I""
. The water level on the- path gets so det;p~ ~ s~IJJ~ ~Quld dro~ -m tlie .......;:- /~r - . - :
flooded area . 4" . . ~- - u
.
,
....
.... r..
.
"
~
I
.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF .I....ESOTA
September 15, 1997
Mr. Andrew Gruber
1034 GIlbert Court
Stillwater, MN 55082
Subject:
Alteration of Lot Grading
Dear Mr. Gruber:
The CIty of Stillwater has received complaints from several residents in the
Highlands area and the Lily Lake School has contacted the City as well. These parties
are concerned about the potential hazardous situation and nuisance which has recently
developed on the pedestrian path that crosses your property.
Upon investigation we have found that water up to one foot in depth is trapped on .
the pedestrian path, unable to flow down the original natural water course. This situation
has resulted from alteratIons to the landscape in your back yard. Recently, Mr. Dave
Junker, ~ city staff member, was in contact with you regarding this situation. As he
explained this is not acceptable and this is not the approved drainage pattern for your lot.
Mr. Junker has informed me that you indicated that you are not interested in correcting
this situation. Therefore, I need to mfom you.th3.t this situation is not acceptable and
must be corrected. If this situation continues, it will be hazard to pedestrian in the wjnter
an~ could lead to property damage to the City's pedestrian trail and neighbor's prop~.
,
-' When your lot was approved for development a grading plan ~as deVeloped, :"';
which inSUred that water would be able to flow from the vicinity of the trail to the far
comer ofy~ur lot ana then down the hill to the pOnd. .When your lot was rough graded
by a con~to~, It~was inspected by the City and found it was acceptable a!- that tim~. _'
However; recently'8.dditionallandscapmg has been done which has blocked the drainage.
Given that the natural contour of the larld drainSihis'>area-to~ards thep'ond, it is your
obligation to continue this drainage pattern. '-'-.." . . :;'-. - ~
i' ... ~ ....,. ..;- ... _ I
, - ,
. . You need to take corrective action to remedy this situation p~i to md-of this ~.
.: year's COnstruction seasoc. It appears that the proper way to correct this would be to
regrade the backyard to create a natural grade in the land which would allow water to
flow. In that the construction season is getting shori; I ask that in the next 15 days (prior .
to October 1, 1997) you contact the CIty with your plans and timeline for addressing this
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
\
,.
.
Mr. Andrew Gruber
September 15, 1997
Page Two
problem. CIty staffwill be available to provide grade stakes to insure that grading is
done properly and to our satisfactIon.
If I do not hear from you before October 1, 1997, I WIll assume that you plan not
to proceed with these improvements. In this case the City can take action to make these
necessary Improvements to reduce the safety hazard and potentIal for property damage.
All costs for dOIng this work can be assessed against your property. ObVIously the City
does not wish to proceed in such a manner and therefore would hope for your
cooperatIon.
I can appreciate the fact that you may not be pleased WIth the fact that the natural
drainage does flow through your backyard. However, this was known pnor to any
development on your lot and the development plan called for tins to remam. I wish we
did not have to require this, but the hazard that has been created and the loss of this
pede_strian path require that we take action. If you would hke to discuss this matter
further, please contact me at 430-8831. Hopefully we can reach a satisfactory solution
for all partIes involved.
. Sincerely,
Klayton H. Eckles, P .E.
City Engineer
KHE:dfw
.
~
.
. LIST OF BILLS
EXHIBIT ftAft TO RESOLUTION 99-79
A T & T Wireless Long distance 127
AWl Diversified Park bench Myrtle Street 850 00
Action Rental Storage rental 13500
A1rtouch Cellular Cellular Service 179 37
Amdahl, Chns Repair locks 9200
Amencan Payment Center Box service 7800
Amencan Planning Assn Planning adv feel membership-Russell 768 00
Ancom Communications Antenna 1800
Anderson Ice Rinks Hose & screws 7861
Appletree Institute Health Insurance Retirees 49,499 18
Bailey Construction Pioneer Park restroom renovation 25,000 00
Berkley Administrators Deposit premium workmens comp 15,74925
Board of Water Commissioners First Quarter 99 WAC 19,55350
Bonestroo Rosene DNR Grant 1 ,341 12
Buberl, Larry Animal transports 200 00
Camas Shlely DIvISion Sand 229 20
Capitol Communications Maintenance contracts 741 00
Catco Parts Service Hose fittings 393 62
Carlson EqUipment Vehicle repair supphes 1,00217
Carquest Repair supphes & 011 filters 299 06
. Century College Class no showsl training Pohce Dept 47833
Chemsearch Bug control supphes 309 03
Cincotta, Carla JV Conference 203 25
City Wide RadiO Squad car radiOS 587 57
Coca Cola Enterpnses Soft drinks for concession sales 1,064 35
Como EnVironmental DIvISion Matenal disposal 1,400 00
Coordinated BUSiness Systems Maintenance copier 206 30
Couner News Employment AdslCI proceeding 111 10
Crysteel Truck EqUipment Lift cyhnder 42281
Cub Foods Bakery & chips for concession sales 11399
o & G Sign & Label Lock out supply kit 13740
Delta Dental Cobra- Beberg 4605
Desch, Mark & GlOria Parking lease & maintenance 979 65
E Z Sharp Hand hone 1667
Ecolab Pest Pest control 227 92
Edward Don & Co Cleaning supplies 7841
Emergency Apparatus Vehicle repair 1,200 00
Express Photo Battery and photo finlshlng-Pohce Dept 2886
Flrstar Trust Co PaYing agent fees 10000
Fredkove Construction Repair countertop-Flre Dept 225 00
Fritz Company Inc Candy for concesSion sales 10600
Gateway Laptop computer -Police Dept 3,308 85
Global EqUipment ShelVing 998 32
. Gordon Iron & Metal Acetelyne 3621
Government Finance Officers Assn 99 GAAFR Update 3100
~
.
Harvard Business Review One year renewal 8500 .
Hennepin Technical College TUltlon- Fire Dept 663 82
Hentage Pnntlng Hockey Camp & School Flyers 705 03
High Times Subscnptlons Subscnptlonsl Police Department 2500
Ice Skating Institute Skating badges 667 50
International Assn of FIre ChIefs Membership dues-Kallestad 9500
International Conference of Building Off Membership dues 7000
Johnnys TV Inc Repair dictating machine 1500
Johnson, Ronald Sams club membership 3000
Kadln, Chantell Public Compensation workshop mileage 2220
Kenna,John Condemnation Commlssloner- Huntsman 1,500 00
Kremer Spnng & Alignment Spnng repair & truck parts 751 05
Knesel, Nile Meeting & coffee supplies 109 44
Lakeland Ford Parts Truck #4 786
Lake Supenor College Training for Fire Dept 164 00
Landscape Architecture Subscnptlons 500
League of MN Cities General Insurance premium 1,661 00
Lemlcke Construction Plow lots & Sidewalks 3,490 00
Legislative AsSOCiates, Inc LobbYist servIces 5,040 00
Lind, Gladys Land purchase payment 927 00
LJ Schuster Co Account Payable checks 978 82
Magnuson Law Firm Legal services 10,826 90
MedIa One Cable servIce Sports Arena 559 21
Menards Concrete, paint & lumber 13548
Metro Athletic Supply Pitching machlnes,balls,screens & plates 4,569 90 .
Metropolitan Council March 1999 SAC charges 12,058 20
MIcrosoft Technet Technetlyear 338 44
Miller Excavating Sewer line break & lime rock 1,262 35
Miller, Dawn Birth certificate 1400
MN Department of Administration Building permit surcharge 2,469 33
Minnesota Safety Council Workshop fee-Bell 9500
MN Society of CPA'S Annual CPA dues-Deblon 105 00
Mobile VISion Repair mobile camera 142 50
MUnicipal Code Corp Pages, zOning & repnnts 1,034 50
MUnlcl Pals 1999 Spnng Round Up 203 00
National League of Cities Membership dues 1,088 00
Oxygen Service Company Inc Bottle oxygen & hydro test 198 26
PMI Computer Supplies Decolator 779 95
Parts AsSOCiates, Inc Machine parts 11186
Quantum Digital CopIes Lily Lake 272
QUill Corporation Office supplies 4494
R & R Specialties Blade gnnds 3900
RW Kirchner & Assn Appraisals-Post Off Trailhead & US Homes 2,45000
RIver Valley Companies Business cards-Police Dept 3727
Russell, Steve Color pnntlng 795
St CroIx Office Supplies Office supplies 854 29
St Cloud University Dnvlng course-Police Dept 1 ,062 00
Sanders Wacker Bergly Inc Landscape deslgn- Lowell Park 3,425 00 .
Spnnt Gas Fuel for Inspections 5352
,#
f
Stillwater Fire Relief Assn 1998 State Fire Aid 78,629 00
. Stillwater Ford Sensor replacement 205-Pollce Dept 239 00
Stillwater Gazette Hearing notices 4560
Stillwater landscaping Snow removal 400 00
Streicher's Training Ammo-Police Dept 1,938 25
Superior Coffee Concession supplies 7350
SYSCO Minnesota Concession supplies 304 37
Target Stores Car washing supplies 2398
Teltronlx Information Systems Technician Library connection LAN 4500
Tomten Environmental Design Services/Legends & Liberty 440 00
Tousley Ford Inc SWitch for truck #9 3647
Tower Asphalt Patch mix 197 70
Transportation Components Co Chevron parts 4513
Treadway GraphiCS DARE Supplies 187 73
Turning POlnte Business Products Mailing labels 15975
TWin City Suburban Conference Gate receipt share 5,086 00
US West Telephone & Court ordered faxes 3,526 99
Ustlpak, Jon Mailbox replacement 1575
Viking Electric Glass 1,157 23
Viking Office Products Office supplies -269 72
Wall Mart Nufinlsh wax 4760
Washington County Traffic services 101 90
Waste Management Service March 99- St CroIx Rec Center 9327
Watson, Dennis Computer programing 4950
. Wlttek Golf Supply Golf balls 600 34
Yocum 011 Co Heating 011 & 55 gal drum 172 80
Ziegler Inc Loader parts 203 35
MANUAL CHECKS. MARCH 1999
Delta Dental Cobra Dental-Beeberg 4605
Rose Floral Flowers-Easton 8538
US Postmaster Utility billing postage 953 86
ADDENDUM TO BILLS
Braun Pump & Control App #2-Alple lift Station Improvements 35,913 65
Coverall of the TWin Cities April cleaning service/City Hall 2,369 63
Jansens Cleaning Service Maintenance/Prison Slte/Llbrary&Clty Hall 1,554 00
Mlnncor Industries Office furniture 2,476 58
Northern States Power Electric/gas 31,73675
PC Solutions Computer maintenance 669 50
Stillwater Gazette Ordinance 873-publlcatlons 15200
U S West Telephone 53747
TOTAL 360,191 51
.
.
.
.
'\.
Sbllwater Fire Relief Assn
Stillwater rd
Stillwater G tte
Stillwater lands
Streicher's
Supenor Coffee
SYSCO Minnesota
Target Stores
Teltromx Informabon Systems
Tomten Environmental Design
Tousley Ford Inc
Tower Asphalt
Transportation Components Co
Treadway Graphics
Turning POlnte Business Products
TWin City Suburban Conference
US West
Usbpak,Jon
Viking Electric
Viking Office Products
Wall Mart
Washington County
Waste Management
Watson, Denms
Wlttek Golf Supply
Yocum 011 Co
Ziegler Inc.
1998 State Fire Aid
Sensor replacement 205-Pollce Dept
Hearing notices
Snow removal
TraJmng Ammo-Police Dept
Concession supplies
Concession supplies
Car washing supplies /
Technician library connection LAN ",.f
Servicesll.egends & liberty I"
SwItch for truck #9 .'
Patch mix <-
Chevron parts
DARE Supplies
lJIg labels
receipt share
Tel & Court ordered faxes
MaIIbd replacement
Glass J
Office
NufiniSh wax
Traffic services
,
Service March 9g.; t CroIX Rae Center
,/ Computer programln
I Golf balls
I
Heating 01 & 55 gal dru
loader parts
MANUALCHECKS-MARCH1H9
J'
r
Delta Dental
Rose Floral
US Postmaster
/1
,
/
/
/'
-(
"
"
Cobra Dental-Beaberg
Flowers-Easton
Utility billing postage
/
,
"
..
,
,
/
;
/
78,629 00
239.00
45.60
400 00
1,938 25
73.50
304 37
2398
4500
440 00
3647
197 70
45.13
187.73
159.75
5,086 00
3,526.99
15.75
1,15723
269 72
47.60
101.90
93.27
49.50
600.34
172.80
203.35
~
4605
8538
953.86
..... -- -~
" .~ -:"':~ :- - ..;-~-t:~~: ={;~~:-- -::..~~~..
=
..'E:- ..
.. -4'"',
~
~. .
"II.... ....
. '-
;. !~ 001- --
_ :' ~ -:;.~ :::0,-;: .. ",,=: _ ,.. ..._
- . " . ..: .~ -:2--'- - :.., - - . -
J.;..... '=:...rr!'''': '). -
Minnesota Depai1ment of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
St. Paul, MN 55101-5133
(651)296-64391DD (651)282-6555
APPUCATION AND PERMIT
FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR UCENSE
TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION
NAME OF ORGANIZATION TAX EXEMPT NUMBER
Church of St. Michael 8454184
STREET ADDRESS - - . . ~.: ~ STATE - ZIP ~QDE
611 S. ~ Third 'St. ~~- '- - . -.: ~---;- ~ : -, .. - ~ a!;"~Stillwater:~ - ...-....:,..- :-:-..!HN _ _:.__;: ~5U82 " ~
NAME OF PERSON MAKING APPUCATION .; USlNESS PHONE " _ _ HOME PHONE
z . e ~:I ~Sl ) ~439-1J400 (651) -439-4400
DATES UQUOR WILL BE SOLD OF ORGANlZATION
Ju1 24, 1999 OCLUB OCHARlTABLEDmmuGIOUS OOTHER NONPROFIT
ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME DRESS - - - ~
Michael C. Skluzacek - 0" 611 ~S. Third St:, Stillwater 55082
ORGANIZATION OFFICER'S NAME DRESS
- -" r t.:.509 cS. Greele St- "Stillwater 55082
,; ~ JiY~~S."'-Ev~ett STt~; ~St-iu~ter 55082
.-' . - - "- - '~..-- "0 :.. 0 ' -; ::.~-.~ .-.-: ;:-___ . ~-. ~-L
Location where license will be used. Jf an outdoor 8Ie3, describe.' \ '.: ~. - =-.';: - _
... - ,,-'" .... -:;I..:..,.. # - .. 4 ,..
Parking lot - adj acent .to.'the applicant r s buildings ::' -. - - -.
::- ':..-;-. :r~it..::'\r:t\~..J.-:"~~;;~:P~~I.~)";~-.. -'l.-'~;!.:~p_~:;... ........_
-J"-~-" ~_.::r~..
"..- .I>
...... ~....
, -
-.
, It - _~. ~.. - ... , .... ~
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquoC"se:rvic:es? If so, aM: tbe JIlIIIIe and address of tbe liquor Jiceosee providing the service.
... .}... ~.... ~' ,.... _...- _ :: .. i _
NO h
...~ :.-....... !';- _" ..-":.':F.~._""'''''-~':---c.~~:.:':''' ..... -'" -
"'. '10. a r ..... . ..;:
Will the applicant cany liquor liability iDsur.mcefIf so, the caaier's Dime and amOunt of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is Dot mantf"tory.) yes J' ..... ~
.-
.T
APPROVAL' :.'
~
APPUCAnONMUSTBEAPPIlOVED BY arY OR COtJNTYBDORESDBMlTl'INGTOALCOBOLII: &\MBIJNG ENFORCEMENT
ClTYICOUNTY . 'DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT ...... , UCENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
-
-
SIGNAllJRE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFPICAL _~ .!, ~ :";' -- - . -.' .
.: ."~ -, ,,,..:...""4:. -(~"'~- . : "".."'_..s
APPROVED Ak:oho1 a: Gamblmg EDfon:emeot Duector
.. r .--:.: "_ : .,....;r_,.}i~_.... 1:....;- ;. :.., .._4> ..
Note: Do DOt separate these two puts,....1JotIa "",CD die ~ aIMm ad tile orf&iaaI sigDed by this diYisiOD
wiD be retaraed . die Iaase. Submit CD tbe city or Cauaty at last 30 days Won the eYeDt.
PS-09079 (6198)
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FR:
Building Official
RE:
Asst. Building Inspector position
DA:
April 2, 1999
Discussion:
The City Council previously authorized the employment of an additional Building
Inspector for the Inspection Department I am now requesting that the City hire 10hn
Buckley as an Asst. Building Inspector.
lohn has performed some building inspection work for the City in the past. He is
currently certified as a Building Official-Limited which allows him to perform residential
and "light" commercial inspections. 10hn is presently working toward his Class A
Building Official certification and should be able to obtain this certification within one to
two years. lohn would be available for employment by April 26th.
I will be at the meeting Tuesday (4:30 P.M.) to discuss this further with you ifnecessary.
Recommendation:
Council adopt resolution employing lohn Buckley as Assistant Building Inspector at step
4 of the salary schedule for the position.
/
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
.
APPROVING FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT OF JOHN BUCKLEY, JR. AS
ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the full-
time employment of John Buckley, Jr. as Assistant Building Inspector from and after
April 26, 1999, for a probationary period of6 months, is hereby approved; and that as
compensation for services the said John Buckley, Jr. shall receive a salary at Step 4 of the
salary schedule and benefits as specified for the position in the agreement between the
City of Stillwater and AFSCME Council 14.
Adopted by Council this 6dt day of April, 1999.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
~-
. -
.. -~....
..... ~.. - .. .
, .
- Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enfolcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
SL Paul, MN 55101-5133 .
(651)296-6439 TDD (651)282-6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE UQUOR LICENSE
TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION
NAME 0 ORGANIZATION
~I
s:ro~"Z-
Location where lic:~nse !rill be used. If an outdoor area, cfescrlbe
'-~
.. "'....
-
-.l!...Otlll.1l{ .HI:11lJTlIl! ~ "'~d..J!!.'Tl-ldu.st!F
I. .' -:. r~ .. ~ ~_ .
- lI)~tl-IAJ6-1lJAJ
Will the applicant contract for in~g liquor services? If so, give the DIllIe aod addn:ss of dIe Hquor licensee providing the service.
..... .. .,.
lJ{)
Will the applicant carry liquor liability insurance? If so, the cazrier's D8IJJC and amount of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory.) --A/ () .
APPROVAL
APPLICAnON MUSTBEAPPIlOVED BY OTY OR COUNTYBEFORESIJBMD"l'ING l'OALCOIIOL& GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT UCENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
SIGNATURE CTY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL
APPROVED Alcobol a: Gamblmg EDfon:cment D1n:ctor
Note: Do DOt separ.de tbese two plII1s, send both JIIIl1lI to the addnss __ aad tile arigiD8I signed by tIus division
WIll be retIInIed as the Dcease. Submit to the eft)' 01' Caaaty . last 30 .,. before the event.
PS.09079 (6198)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
Sl Paul, MN 55101-5133
(651)296-6439 TDD (651)282-6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FORA TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
DATE ORGANIZED
TAX EXEMPT NUMBER
3\ -6' a
SDcrE ~CODE
HKJ 55lJ8d-...
HOME PHONE
(fGl) 1-
CITY
6T1 u.w~
BUSlNESSPHONE
, 1> ",30 - ol'24
TYPE OF ORGANlZA110N
Oa.UB OCHARlTABLE DRELIGIOUS
ADDRESS J I _
/4 lh I Jf.
ADDRESS _
J 46 IJOJf!7lI. - ;j UIJ.J.
ADDRESS qtIt j, IJ
Location where license will be used. If an outdoor area, describe
WIt6Ht AJ6-flJlfJ (!fflUJTV/ HI 617JJUt!. ll.iJu.I!::T HtJll~
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the uame and address of the liquor licensee providing the service.
/...16
Will the applicant carry liquor liability ~ce? If so, the cmier's name and amount of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory.) 0
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUSI' BE APPROVED BY crrYOR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMl'n1NGTOALCOBOL& GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT UCENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
SIGNATURE CITY a.ERK OR COUNTY OFFICAL
APPROVED Alcohol &: GamblIng EufOl1:CZlleDt Director
Note: Do DOt seplII'lIte these two parts, sead botII parts to the address .\le and tile origmaI siped by this divisioa
will be returned as the Uceme. Submit to the City 01' Coaaty at least 30 days before the eYeat.
PS-09079 (6198)
- "'-.,.:';;- ..f:i- ~~
Minnesota Depariment of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar St-Suite 133
Sl Paul, MN 55101-5133
(651)296-64391DD (651)282-6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FOR A TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
~ iJ 5s/Z~
Location where license wiD. be used. If an outdoor ami, describe
l{ JA-~HI AJ6-niJ ~AllAJV1f HI t:JTo/l. /tI l!m>>m+aU:5€
Will the applicant con1Iact for intoxicating liquor services? If so. give the IIlIIIIC and address of the liquor JiceDsee providing the service.
AJ{)
Will the applicant carry liquor liability insnrance? If so, the carrier's aame and amount of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory.) J1 / n
.
APPROVAL
APPLICATlONMUSTBEAPPROVED BY C'l'YOR COUNTY BD'ORE smrMDTING1OALCOBOL 4: GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT UCENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
-
SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFF1ClAL--- --
APPROVED Ak:oiiol .I: Gamblmg EafOR:elllent Dtrector
Note: Do DOt separate these two plIrtI, semi both pIII1s to tile addnss 8boYe .... tbe orfciaaI 51... by tIds cliYisioa
will he retumed . Ibe Ucease. SaInait to tile citJ .. Caaat1 at last 30 days before the eYeDt.
PS-09079 <&'98)
.
THE BIRTHPLACf Of MINNESOTA
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO SELL
Permit No
99 - 32
Location LIly Lake Park
Organization
Organization Type (Individual, For-Profit, or Non-Profit) Non Profit OrganIZation
First Name Dan
Last Name King
Address 1018 7th Street S
City StIllwater
., .
Date of Birth:
State MN Zip 55082
Mailing Address (if different th~ above)
Home Phone 430-1143' ,Work Phone 737-2085
Event (softball game, wedding, ~tc. 'Softball ToUrnament
~ .
Type of Activity (fund rai~er, dancing, music etc.) Fund raiser
Beginning Day: F~day, April 23, 1999 Beginning Time 5:00 PM
.
Ending Day lp.ursday, April 25, 999
~... --
Selling of Beer 3-2 ~
Selling of Beer (over 3-2)* 0
Selling of Liquor* 0
Selling ofWine* 0
*Requires a temporary license through MN Liquor Control
Ending Time 8:00 PM
.MorIi Weldon, City Clerk
OFFICE USE ONLY
Permit to Sell Issued
o
Approved by City Council on
.
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
.
.
.
Memorandum
April 2, 1999
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles )L.I
City Engineer I:
SUBJECT: Process for Pilling Engineering TechnicIan II Position
DISCUSSION:
Staffhas begun the process of filling the vacant Engineering Technician II
position. Council should pass a motion fonnally directing staff to do so.
ACTION REOUlRED:
Council should pass a motion directing staff to proceed with the hiring process for
the Engineering Technician II position.
- -------... -- --- --------- ------------------------------------- ----------- ------
DEPARTMENT
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
MEETING DATE
Fire
4/6/99
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is)
The Fire DqJartment is requesting the pmchase of two computers. One Desktop comnuter for
$1848.00 and one lat'top computer w/dockin2 station for $2866.00. The total cost of this request
with tax is $5020.41. Ouotes attached for these computers.
FINANCIAL IMP ACI' (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and the
proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
$5000.00 was in the canital outlav bud2et for 1999 for this expenditure.
ADDmONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED
YES X
NO
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMIITl:ill TO THE CITY CLERK A
MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKlNG DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL l\1EETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBl\.1ITTED BY ~ t? ~%~ Date ~~ .'
.
.
.
Solo 5150 LS
.
Page 1 of2
~Gateway.
Solo 5150 LS
Screen: 14. 1 inch XGA Active Matrix Color Display
Processor: Intel Pentium n processor 333:Mhz w/256K. Full Speed L2
Cache
Memory: 64MB SO-DIMM SDRAM expandable to 288l\1IB
Graphics Accelerator: 256-Bit Accelerator w/2.5MB Video
Memory
Hard Drive: 6.4GB Ultra ATA Removable hard drive
Floppy Drive: 1.44MB 3.5inch Floppy Disk Drive
CD-ROM: 8X min.l20X max. CD-ROM drive
Multimedia Package: 16-bit Software Wavetable Audio w/Stereo
Speakers, Internal Microphone, HeadphonelSpeak:er Jack, Line-in and
Line-out Mic Jacks NTSC OUT
FaxlModem: PCMCIA V.90 56K. DataIF AX Modem
Expansion Slots: Two deep socketed PCMCIA Type n slots
Battery: Lithium Ion battery with battery gauge and AC Pack
Keyboard: Fun-Size 8S-key Keyboard with MS W"mdows 95 Keys
MoUse: EZ p.p Plus Pointing Device
Carrying Case: Casual Canying Case
Dimensions: 12.4inch x 9.7inch x 1.6inch, 6lbs 120zs
LANDesk Software: Intel LANDesk Client Manager Software v.3.3
Additional Software: McAfee Anti-Virus Software & Intel
LANDesk Client Manager 3.3
Application Software: Not Included subtracted: US$72
Operating System: Microsoft Wmdows 98
Certifications: FCC Class B, UL and CSA certified
Service Program: 1 Year Parts & Labor Limited Wmanty
Gateway Solo Mini Docking Station: Gateway Solo Mini Docking
Station added: US$l94}
Base Price: US $2744
Configured Price: US $2866
FOB Destination
Quantity: 1
Total Configured Price: US$2866
.
.
o Order This System Online
@Generate A Quote
http://www.gw2k.com/cgi-bin/cal....Price.pl
4/2/99
E-3200 450
Vb .o~o .. W
VJ\1l _ \~/--\V ·
~'B V\
~~\o' ~\
o OJ 0'
~~~
- - ---- - -
titGatewa~
E-3200 450
Processor: Intel 450MHz Pentium ill processor with 512k Cache
Memory: 96MB 100Mhz SDRAM subtracted: US$47
Monitor: EV700 17inch color monitor (15.9inch viewable area)
Graphics Accelerator: Integrated ATI Rage Pro Turbo 4MB AGP
Graphics Accelerator
Hard Drive: 804GB 5400RPM SMART n Ultra ATA hard drive
Floppy Drive: 3.5inch 1.44MB diskette drive
CD-ROM: 13X minJ32X maL CD-ROM drive
Multimedia Package: Integrated 16-bit Business Audio & GCS 100
speakers added: US$29
FaxlModem: U.S. Robotics 56K* Voice W'mmodem added: USS62
Case: Highly Serviceable, Convertible Case
Network Card: Integrated 3COM PCI 10/100 Twisted Pair Ethemet
wlWOL
Keyboard: 104+ Keyboard
Mouse: MS IntelliMouse mouse & Gateway mouse pad
LANDesk Software: Intel LANDesk Client Manager Software v3.3
Operating System: Microsoft Wmdows 98
Service Program: Years 2 & 3 of On-Site Service
McAfee Anti-Virus Software: McAfee Anti Virus Software
Base Price: US $1804
Configured Price: US $1848
FOB Destination
Quantity: 1
Total Configured Price: US$1848
o Order This System Online
@Generate A Quote
Ordering information is
encrypted using the Secure
Socket.Layer (SSL) protocol
hefore heing transferred to our
Web Server for processing.
[ Conbnue J
http://www.gw2k.com/cgi-binlcatprice.pl
Page 1 of2
.
.
.
4/1/99
J
.
.
.
..
Memo
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
Kim A Kallestad < z:'
Date:
April 2, 1999
Subject:
Assistant Fire Chief Promotional Process
Permission is requested to start the promotional process to :fill a vacancy in the position
of Assistant Fire Chief, Part-time. The vacancy is being created by the retirement of
Assistant Fire Chief Ion Conati, effective May 2, 1999.
RESOLUTION NO.
ADOPTING EMERGENCY RESPONSE POllCY
FOR smw ATER FIRE DEPARTMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the Stillwater Fire
Department Emergency Response Policy, attached hereto as Exhibit" A", is hereby adopted.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
.
.
.
.
.
Date:
Subject:
Scope:
Purpose:
Policy:
Stillwater Fire Department
Policy
Apnl 6, 1999
Emergency Response ReqUIrements
Emergency call attendance for part-tIme personnel
To amend and define the minimum standard for response to emergency
inCIdents for all part-time personnel.
Each part-time employee must respond to a minimum of twenty percent
(20%) of all asSIgned emergency incidents during each quarter of the
calendar year (I.e., January through March, Apnl through June, July
through September, and October through December)
EngIneers and officers are assigned to all emergency InCIdents that are
dispatched through the department-wide radIO activatIon tone.
Firefighters are asSIgned to all emergency Incidents that are dIspatched
through the department-wide radio actIvatIon tone, except calls for a
statIon standby
Persons not meetIng the minImum requirement during a quarter shall
receive written notification of such violation of this policy.
Persons not meeting the requirement during two quarters of any
consecutIve four-quarter penod shall receive a written reprimand.
Persons not meeting the reqwrement during three quarters of any
consecutIve eight-quarter penod shall receIve a thIrty (30) day suspensIon
from duty.
Persons not meetIng the reqwrement during four quarters of any
consecutIve eIght-quarter penod shall be subject to dISmlSSal by the CIty
CounCIl
The Fire ChIef, WIth the concurrence of the City Coordmator, shall have
authonty to exerCIse Judgement in the applicatIon of thIs pohcy for
unusual or extenuatIng CIrcumstances such as mJury, Illness, authorized
leave of absence, etc.
Date adopted by City Councd
Resolutlon number
-- -
- - - -
- - - -
-- -. - ---
--- - - - -
---- - -
------
--- -
--- -
- ---- -
....----- :
-- -- -
- - - -- -
- -- -- -
- ----- ---
- --- - -
-----
--- -- ---
. - -- - -
- -- - -
-- ------ -
- -----
-- - --
--- -
- - -- -----
--- -
- ---.-
------
---- --
-- ---- --
- -- -- - -
- -- -- --
-- -- - --
- ---- --
----
-----
--------
---
---
--
--- --
---
Mem.ornndum
.
--- ---
--- - -- -- --
- ---- - -- -----
To: Mayor Kimble and City Council Members
CC: Nile Kriesel
From: Larry Dauffenbach, Police Chief
Date: 04/02/99
Re: Appointment of part-time police officers
We have completed the testing process for part time police officer. I would like to
~"}i!ce a conditional job offer to Michael Gerald Whitaker and Stephan Scott Hansen.
:Q.~le are full time police officers right now. Whitaker is working for Anoka
~~.p~ and Hansen is employed at the City of Bayport. - Both officers will be
iV8iJaJ)le~to work part-time shifts in the City of Stillwater ftom May through Oct.
Ihel'iIftime officers are used to SI'IlgJ1'P.nt and supplement our full time staff during
~~er when our tourist and festival season is at its peak. Summer-is also the
season.when the full time staft"wants their vacation.
Because they are full time licensed police officers already they should be easier to
tfiin7 be more productive and less liability to the City than part-time licensed police
officers. During the field-training phase, I would like to pay them $8.85 per hour.
After completion of the field training and they are certified to work shifts, I would
like to pay them $12.55 per hour. This would be giving them credit for experience
they have gained on their full time job.
The conditional offer would be providing the officers could pass a physiological
exam and physical exam.
.
As you are wen aware, we have had a JarSe tumover in the past in our part time
officers. Most of these officers were looking for full time employment. By the time
we were able to train them, they found jobs elsewhere. This was a big expense to
our department with little return. I am hopeful this new approach will work.
--- ----- - ----:::=-- -:.-
1.
-
- -
- - - -
.
.
.
Approving Part-Time Employment of Michael Gerald Whitaker
and Stephan Scott Hanson as Police Officers
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the
part-tIme employment of Michael Gerald Whitaker and Stephan Scott Hanson as Police
Officers, from and after Apri115, 1999, is hereby approved; and that as compensation for
services the said Michael Gerald Whitaker and Stephan Scott Hanson shall receive $8.85
per hour during the field-training phase and $12.55 per hour thereafter.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
CIty Clerk
RESOLUTION 99-
.
Reapportionment of Special Assessments, Approval of Abatements and Approval of
Refund for L.I. 308 upon Parcels #29.030.20.12.0038, #29.030.20.12.0039 and
#29.030.20.12.0040 Punuant to a Release Dated November 8, 1997
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater origmally adopted the special assessments for local
improvement #308 upon PIN # 10250-2050, and
WHEREAS, the property owner filed and perfected an assessment appeal, and
WHEREAS, the original special assessment amount was for $148,345.29, and
WHEREAS, the property owners signed a release of claim and agreed to pay the amount
of $136,000.00 as and for the special assessments for L.I. 308, and
WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater has received notice and a copy of the release on
March 19, 1999 and hereby intends to fulfill the terms of the release, and
WHEREAS, a new amortization schedule has been prepared for the property and is
attached as exhibit A
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of .
Stillwater, Minnesota, that the attached exhibit A is approved and abatements for the
years payable 1997, 1998 and 1999 for parcels #29.030.20.12.0038 and
#29.030.20.12.0039 are approved and refunds for payable 1997 and 1998 for parcel
#29.030.20.12.0040 are approved and an abatement for payable 1999 for parcel
#20.030.12.0040 is approved and the new amortization schedule for each parcel is
approved.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
Attest:
Morh Weldon, City Clerk
.
. . .
Ex Iti!,; f A
L .z, .301 10:2S0- ~O50)
KUTZ ADDITION ABATEMENT (D Il it; Nl.. \ 'PIN"
Geo-Code 29 030 20 12 0038 29 03020 12 0039 29 030 20 12 0040
1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999 1997 1998 1999
Principal $9,889 69 $9,88969 $9.889 69 $9,889 69 $9.889 69 $9.889 69 $9.889 69 $9.889 69 $9,889 69
Interest $3.892 20 $2,571.32 $1,92849 $3,892 20 $2.571.32 $1.92849 $3.89220 $2.571 32 $1.92849
Payments Received -$13,781 89 -$12,461 01
Total Outstanding $13,781 89 $12,461 01 $11.81818 $13.781 89 $12,461 01 $11.81818 $000 $000 $11,81818
Judgement Received
Principal $8.068.67 $8.068 67 $8,086.87 $8,068 67 $8.086 87 $8.088 67 $8,068.87 $8,088 67 $8,068 87
Interest $3,568 oe $2,357.33 $1,78800 $3,1588 oe $2.367 33 $1,76800 $3,1588 06 $2,367 33 $1,768.00
Corrected Amount $12.634 73 $11,42400 $10,834 87 $12,834 73 $11,424 00 $10.834 67 $12.634 73 $11,42400 $10,834 67
Abatemant Owed $1.147.18 $1,03701 $983 51 $1,147.16 $1.037.01 $983 61 $983 51
Abatement to Owner $1,147.16 $1,03701
NEW AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE (per lot)
$138,000 OVer 3 Lota for 5 V.... and 77 Days . 8.1%
Principal Intenlllt On Taxe. Salanca
1998 $45,333 33
1997 $9,086 67 $3,568 oe $12.634 73 $36.266 66
1998 $9,066 67 $2,357.33 $11,42400 $27,19999
1999 $9.086 67 $1,768 00 $10.834 67 $18,13332
2000 $9,06667 $1,17867 $10,245 34 $9.066 65
2001 $9,086 65 $589 33 $9.655 98 $000
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DATE:
March 31,1999.
DEPARTMENT: Parks
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request Is):
Request to hire Robert Hamble to lock up the park restrooms and Staples Field basketball court every mght
at an hourly rate of $13.00 per hour. TIlls Job takes approximately 1 hour per day and helps cut back on our
vandalism In the parks.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, If any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
.
Budgeted for under part-time salaries
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ATTACHED:
YES
NO X
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGUlARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET
SUBMITTED BY ~ -Z ~~~"'- DATE: /JrP.1 l-rr t7Z? .- -" .'"
"11m Thomsen. Parks Director
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
APPROVING PART-TIME EMPLOYMENT OF
ROBERT RAMBLE
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stlllwater, Minnesota, that the
part-tlme employment of Robert Hamble to lock up the parks restrooms and basketball court at
Staples FIeld, from and after Apnl 7, 1999, IS hereby approved; and that as compensation for
services will be $13.00 per hour
Adopted by the City CouncIl this 6th day of Apnl, 1999
CITY OF STILLWATER
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
ctertific-ate., \.:Qf' ,:f%l1p,preciation
I r I ~ I I,,' ~jJ \ I f I ~
, , .. ..4
, . Pres'ented: to
,'/
\ 'lI 1 t'
" , ' .. tt ~~\ .., .....
<ATHFitu"~J'.~.. 'B'."F~~ ': -j< CIS
, .. \,1~~\~ _r,_ i '-' ~.
IN APPRECIA;ION'iOF:;,J~~)GNIFICANT 20NTRIBUTION
'IiIl ", '1\,1 ~S.tfS~'"f\}'''1(.''t.'~tJrvV\,.,,,,,,IUII~'''''J\t'''t.J: ,I' , 'HI' '\ I _
OF OVER:8..YEARS~0F~lDEDICSATED SERVICE
~ it.. \ I' '\ '\ t
AS:A MEMB~RipF'~TIip STIL~W4~ER
I-IERITAGE PRESERV ATI0N COMMISSION
..~,. I ',1 ~ I
\, :" .' "I
'" \.:'," , I.
I '\ ,1 4 \ '\
" . "'.. \
.. .. I '. f, ., h~' 11'1~1 ;';;" ,:'4 BY" t', I
i', I , I' I, "I I I II 1~1:"'''' I,' I '.~ I " .... I"
U - "1 ~ U~I~U.~ '~,.tI""f .. . ...",,'" 1", r ~
'" ~'1 "~f.!J~~1."~ 111~~~'." r f " ,"'" I I, 11'
",THE"t'STILL WATEl~~CITY COUNCIL
.. '\ ','
I, I .14 . ~ "I
.1 fl~' c~l'l''\ I I t ,_ :.
t~, ,'} rJ tt'~:.. tJ ". -'f
\,'" .,,' I ~ ,', I' .. I
APR1L'!:6;~:1999
,
, .
I I ,I
, I ".I,J,IJI.. ..
I., I ,1-, , ... II
~~.
___MA_"_ ____ '" A__ __ -_..._~-----------....---
. ~.. - ~ .... .. 14 ..-". ~,.
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
. DEPARTMENT:Pa~
March 31,1999
DATE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is):
Request to solicit quotes for a basketball court in Meadowlark Park. Sue Fitzgerald and I had a meeting
on March 25th With the neighbors of Meadowlark Park and they all agree to the basketball court gOing In With
the piCniC shelters and a new play strucbJre
. FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
Budgeted for under 1999 Caplfallmprovements
ADDmONAL ITEMS ATTACHED:
YES
NO X
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET.
SUBMITrEDBY ~~ ~~. - DATE: +'/ ,/or? /9.F7' .,,~
. Tim Thomsen, Pa~ Director
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
March 31,1999.
DEPARTMENT: Parks
DATE:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is):
Request to have Bailey Construction Install the pergola and pavers in Pioneer Park
Also request to have Bailey Construction and Greeder E1ecbic install the new lighting in Pioneer Park.
The proposals are attached. The proposal came in $5,500 00 less than what was estimated In the budget.
Bailey Construction has been the contractor on thiS project for the past year completing the work that
Jennifer Easton wanted to see done WIth her park donation. BaIley was the low bidder on the Pioneer
Park Restroom Renovation project that IS presently taking place.
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
.
Budgeted for under 1999 Capital Improvements
-.
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ATrACHED:
YES
x
NO
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. -
SUBMITTED BY ;;;;L;::;:#z -'" - DATE:.fAt 'I /II/' tW .. _.. , u
Tim Thomsen, Parks Director .
riJ;mNKt
Page No.
of
Pages
.
BAILEY CONSTRUCTION
PO 8cIc ffI
STIlLWATER. UN 5!5082
81H51-7tIZI
Free EsIImaI88 - ~.c:re18. CUrb, GuII8r
PROPOSAL AND
ACCEPTANCE
STREET
JOB NAME
PHONE
~ "Me..
AROIITECT
DATE OF PlANS
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specificatIOns and estunates for:
.. -; ---;.. ..--..-.. ...--
e-- - --
.. .. ... - -
!'Y1~lrr'lf~ ~~~;~
/y, A--=-:.7
/' /f r!.('O&r-r:.. .()v- ~
/j 11"J4;_~/-,? -
..f..". r;. /" /- c /~t--
1l3tJotJ ~
/", ~ -/q // . ~r.-I ~A; _a_~~f!-;'-:s.- ~'~~.-~ -- .~-- ----
_ C II../~ . ':t"-x ~~~ --
(.",." '
/.. __ ~_,___c._ .:E9 ~~~7- - -.----
-r; i-' I
/'1.5' :J" fi_
.JtJU ~.
/ ~ O()()
- / -
~
" "'Z -'l., oofJ
.. - - --------
We Propose
hereby to furnish moterlOl and labor - complete in accordance With obove ;F';lfiaJttOns. 'or the sum of
dollars (S :<fl, tJ{J) ~
,
}.
Payment to be mode as .ollows
.. .... ~ ......
Note thiS proposal may be
wlthdrown by us I' not accepted Within
All matenal _ guanlllt..cr ta be as........ All -'t fa be ~... In a -"-
lIke manner accordmg ta standard pnlCtKes A", aII.-- ar ........... tram above
specifIcatIOnS Invalvtng extra costs _II be executed anly upon _,,- anIets. and
will became an extra charge _ and ...... .... .___ All ag_ts _tlllfM't
. stnk... acacIents or delays beyand _ canInII. aw- fa mny f,re faniacla
other nec.....ry Insurance Our -"en are fully --' by Wark_ s Com-
Matlllft Insurance
Authorized
Signatur
Acceptance of Proposal - The ........ pnces ..._If-'lona
and condit.. are ...ttsfactory and .. he'" acnpted You.. authanzed
ta do the work as spec,',ed Po'....nt WIll be made as outlMWd above
Signature
Date of Acceptance
Signature
8oo-t
Page No.
of
Pages
BAILEY CONSTRUcnON
PO 8aK fl1
S11Ll.WATER. UN 55082
81N61-75'ZI
Free Eatim8l88 - ~_ Curb. GuIler
PROPOSAL A,.
ACCEPTANC~
STREET
PHONE
ARCHITECT
DATE OF PLANS
JOB PHONE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for.
co
fq /~ I_r,~
()IJ)
. r /.. j-~ I/o!rs
/~~
-;A... ;:;,A.
/'-e Iw~/--~
_11/0 ,,- I.....
rcJ I<.r
I:~-~". ct ~ I .. H)-~/;'(:~v.i- .--
(' ..yt.. ~ /" -e I~ " c, S c , 0( #'h ,,,vc.,..... f 7" tI ~
.-
We
Propose hereby to furnish mat...ial and labor - complete In accardance with above specifications, for the sum of
dollars (S /" I Sdd ~
.
Payment to be mode as follows
All ma'erlGl .. guaranteed to be as 1pKIf..d All -" to be CIlmpIer.d 1ft a workman. -
'lke manner accorcbng to standard practJcas Atrr altaratal ., RvIG'_ .... above
spaclflCa',onS Invol."ng extra costs Win be __urad onl, upon wrdten orders. and
Will became an extra charge _ and __ the .t.-re. All agteaments contmgent
upon strikes accidents or del.,. be,and _ con,rol ew-r ta carr, f.... tarMda
and other necessary Insurance Our _ke,. ara full, _red II, Workmen s Com-
peMa'lOn Insurance
Authonzed
Signature
Nat. ThiS proposal may b.
w,thdrawn by us If not accepted WIthin
Acceptance of Proposal -The __ pnc.. lfMC,flcattan_
and condlhons _ satlSfac,ory and are ......, lICC8Pted You are oulhanaecl
ta do the work as Spacl"ed Po","",' Will be mod. as OUtlined above
.
Signature
Oat. of Acceptance
Slgnatur.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO.
ACCEPTING PROPOSALS AND APPROVING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF STILLWATER AND
BAILEY CONSTRUCTION
FOR PIONEER PARK IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, proposals were requested for the installation of new lighting, pergola and pavers
in Pioneer Park; and
WHEREAS, Bailey Construction has submitted a proposal for materials and labor to install
pergola at a cost of $8000 and pavers at a cost of $14,000; and
WHEREAS, Bailey Construction has submitted a proposal to install light poles, including
trenching, all electrical work, concrete bases and mounting for a cost of $16,500;
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the above listed
proposals are accepted and the agreement between the City of Stillwater and Bailey
Construction for the installation of new lighting, pergola and pavers in Pioneer Park is hereby
approved.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STAFF REQUEST ITEM
DEPARTMENT: Parks
DATE:
March 31,1999 .
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is):
Request to order the following Items for our parks:
PICniC Shelters for Lily Lake play area, Meadowlark Park and Northland Park
SWing set and small play equipment for Lily Lake Park
Dnnklng fountain and BBQ grills for Ramsey/Grove Park
FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any. that are associated with this request and
the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request)
.
Budgeted for under 1999 Capital Improvements
ADDITIONAL ITEMS ATTACHED:
NO X
YES
ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED
COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET
SUBMITTED BY .:;:t', y~..- DATE: ~// 4,/'" /.:P~
Tim Thomsen, Parks Director
.
.
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO SELL
Permit No
99 - 52
Location Lily Lake Park
Organization
Organization Type (Individual, For-Profit, or Non-Profit)Non Profit Organization
First Name John
Last Name LaVenture
Address 1833 Richall Drive ~_ _ - D~te_ofBirth:
,~ ,... 'I:. ~.,(<",,'r~
. A~c'" __ ...~~~~?~~
CIty Woodbury ~:'t~tate..~~' iP-SS125f!" ("J :r--:?::....~_..
~~~~~ ~ ~ w :>..:1.&.:. .;.-/ ~ ;1'''''''/:::!': .....
Mailing Address (if difTerent"'th81:t;bO~j ~ ~ ~~~ j~ ~ !#f .~~:;:.~ ;~,.."
e=~"'-""'~ .,. i. ";":'::......~~~' -""'= ....~~....f'i,r..Frrl':.t...~lIp...::~"1.:1 ..::i.oI.,7..1 ...or_l" ';~....;.."
.....t,t:'"!Jfo. "i"\. ~t:-~..~ ~.;~,.-f.'''~~'''',,;o!:P:r':~~~...;.. ...~.!~\-'~ ~ Y -...~~,~ ..._
Home Phone 651-738-0896 ~ 'WoikPhone-~651-458-2188 '~<-'S.'1f.....~/ ~. it'..:\ -{ z
""~.i"~-~~~tr J.J';~ '<rj(':-~.::/ ~:::".Y. ;-.=.;.~
Event (softball game, !,ed!fin'g,:'etc:' Softballl'ouinment - ;.~. :', :.;/ ~ y;.~':t?
__""'"-;,;.>;..... _~ ._~, _ .~s....... ""~"." ",i..-
~~r.j~"....5J.:. ~V".J __("""rt''-'~''';j .. -"-~' ~r"~..'" J
4pe of Activity-(iund~;aiser;aancing, niUSic etc:r'), '.::'t, ~~~>- .-;-
~....... -~~~~IO-~~8' ,...... " :t;~C\.oy "'.-,>1""- -, ....
..;.v--{.....~~......-,~ ,~ , t ~O;;4 ~"" ~....;"-i.,--4~~~~r..::~..,.~
eginning DaY:_:friday;May 07, 1999 _ . ~ ~ <, _..:~~ Beginning Time 6:30 PM ~:~1 .... 'w ~
-, - -r"';"J("":,.~~"";l ...,..: _""::'....."'" J : .:1 ~......:;::,,;1 .. ..rt... f'" r~
EndingDay:.~''''S'Uncb.tMaY09, 1999-: ~ ::; ~-' #E~EndingTime 10:00PM ~l),;~:~;.{ .,::\
;:..:~ ~ ~Jf " ~," ~ .}"~~~ -..... -:-.; w.
. ..tli;;f fo;::-"':.... Y..r:- ~ ~ 'Ji 1 .-......._~ .-~.. w -- .
SelImg of Beer 3-2 If _~ lEI =---' '-'. ',,: .>'i:i' ..-. -'. ,...."- -.' .
1.1": t:...f::.....i)'~~" ~t4 - -__ J!. ....JI'J-~l.,e.L.., ;I' -- ... '.......: .. -
.. ......>....~_,.,'')~..._ r~~~ ..... ......_~......., *........ A. <
Selling of Beer-(oier 3-2)* 0 ':', ~~'.1:~:-: ......::::::::"=- :-=--=----"-". =~" :-'/..;,..: .
1.. ~~ ~\; :G'5d~...... f J 1 -'-\ -- -------.".~ I \
..."'" .::r..-:;"A'L":~~' '+ r \ \ - - j ,
Selling ofLiquor~'''''~: 0 : .. . r:..
~_;: ..> ". :t' -..
"". 'II ~~,_f ': "..," .... .,r..J"
Selling ofWine* "'~~.{:\ 0 ~ ."
'....... _l:::,"J~..i:,.:. t" ~ ..
...., ..-~...1;. .... \ ~ :.:
*Requir~~~}"~~~!.~?, license through MN, Liquor Control _ ~\........ -: .
"'-;'" ...";.~~_l "" :'1..:.1 -...._ -..,: ". ':-..)-- ~
:.../ ~ 7~~ _...:..,.'\.<_-";;';"~.:--__ .., "'-.....__ w ,. -~ - 'II~ ..
P ~ ..v .. ,..~~r~; ... __ -..........::.. '\ --:..__ l -~ '\ r ~"'f :
,,..,... 'l1r~.",.. ... .-"'..-,.. _J" -"''''"- ~,
Morli W eldon, ~~tY ~1~r1~ _ : ~ . _ ' '\ ~:7 ~-._~ .2.-=:s::. ~ ._.._ ~-:-.. \ .~;:
.. ~..Ps\"""": ~..1'.... .. --'"'S.., ... ......_~ ......~ _ .~~ ,"'" ",I ""''\ -
......~ "'-t'1JJ. ~... I.........,,> ..., .. "" ~- - --.______.......~ rf-' -. -~ ", _.,f ~
~'l"'-:"'\Il",",~'\;'- IP~, ~"':;'''''__ _ --...... ""'... -I ...-=_...;,"'_, '..:"s 1..~"''''''-?
- "'''''''1#'.-'1(' .,. ~"'... ........'---_ ... I .,. - "........ '- -.. It. ..~....,/
~~.:. - ~, OFFICE USE ONLY -': - . ,. . 's. .-
...... "...- _~............._...... _. ~~ ....... ..:: J..-:,;"'- "_... ::!.. ..lJ
... ~ ..... '" 4 ~ ..').. f .. \ ~
Permit to Sell Issued .. '.'0; . -. v _Approved by City Council on
. 1 -....., - -;. :II '\. ~ -' ,,-
_";~ ~_ ..t.~...~"" -",a." ."'... :1 ...~~,.....
.. , - J ~ .....::.: - 1. -J ....... ..~ -... ,,)-
. ... 01- ~"'''_ .. ....I..... _......(..t~11 'i:~1tY.""
: :: ~:. .::-": '1.~1::..-;:-~'"
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
Memo
DATE:
Apnll,1999
TO:
Mayor and ~ty ~Cil
Chantell~
Administrative AssistantIPersonnel Coordinator
FROM:
RE:
Pay Equity Hay Point Values
Attached. is a revised Pay Equity Hay Point Value schedule. This revised schedule includes point
values for the following job classifications, which did not exist during 1998:
Job Classification
Engineer Technician IT
Lead Worker
Admin. Support/MIS Specialist
Point Values
212
220
225
Recommendation
We recommend the City Council adopt the attached revised point value schedule with the
addition of the three job classifications, listed above.
PAY EQUITY/MEMO to CC 04-06-1999
.
.
.
.
.
.
.. - ----..--... ------ - ..-.-... - - _.-
------- - -- -- - ---.... - - - ----- - --
HBr Point Values
4/1/99
- - :
- q.'. .: -;::. ~ '~"--11"".' ~
LaborlMalntenance Worker 82
Custodian 121
Parking Enforcement Officer 121
ReceptJonlstlClerk- TypISt 122
Community Service Officer (CSO) 122
library Assistant I 128
Ur. Parkkeeper 170
library Secretary 173
light Equipment Operator 173
library Assistant" 174
Secretary 177
[SecretarylDlspatcher I 187
SecretarylDlspatcher " 194
Senior Account Clerk 194
Sewer Maintenance Worker 197
Mechanic 197
Parkkeeper 197
Heavy Equipment Operator 197
Chief Mechanic 208
Engineer Tech " 212
library AssoCiate 213
Lead Worker 220
Admin. SupportlMlS Specialist 225
Fire FlghterlEnglneer 230
lIbranan I 259
Engineer Tech III 262
Budding Inspector 262
Patrol Officer 280
Engineer Tech IV 292
City Clerk 312
ASSIstant Public Works Director-8treets 320
Fire Captain 327
NarcoticslJuvllnvestig Officer 331
ASSt. Finance Director 332
Planner 342
Asst. library Director 357
Budding OffiCial 362
Sergeant 382
Asst. Public Works Director-Parks 385
Civd Engineer 398
Asst. Fire Chief 424
Admin. AsstJPersonnel Coordinator 479
Public Works Director 525
....brary Diredor 554
Captain 562
Comm. Development Director 588
Fire Chief 618
Finance Director 677
City Engineer 732
Police Chief 739
IClty Coordinator 1040
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 98-339
APPROVING REVISED PAY EQUITY
HAY POINT VALUE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the Hay Management Consultant System and resultant point values were approved
by Council on December 15, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the job classifications of Engineer Technician n, Lead Worker, and
Administrative Support/MIS Specialist have been added; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to update the job evaluation study;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that
the resultant point values, attached as Exhibit A, are hereby approved.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Mayor
ATI'EST:
City Clerk
.
.
-
.
J
k
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO
Mayor and Councll
FR
CIty Coordmator
RE
Ammaltmpound contract-
fees
DA:
Apn15, 1999
DISCUSSIon'
The City Councll preVIously approved entenng into a contract With Larry Buberl for
antmal impound services (i.e., transportIng anImals to the Woodbury AnImal Shelter).
The fees were to be $25 00 per transport. However, Mr. BuberlIs askIng that he be
reImbursed $35.00 per transport InvolVIng more than one animal. I beheve thIs is a
reasonable request and would recommend settIng the reimbursement rate at $25 00 per
transport of one animal and $35 00 per transport of two or more animals at same tIme
(I.e., rate would be $35 00 per transport and not per antmal)
RecommendatIon'
Councll approve ExhibIt "A" setting reimbursement rate at $25 00 per transport of one
animal and $35.00 per transport of two or more anImals at same tlme for antmaltmpound
contract.
.
~A
,
~
.
2 Apr 99
Re Animal Impound Contract
Dear Mr Knsel,
In reference to the contract dated 16 Feb 99, sectIon four states that the "CIty will
pay the consultant the rate set forth on the attached exhIbit A"
When I VISIted you at your office on 1 Apr 99, we found that "ExlnbIt A" had not
been originated.
In the past I had been paid $25 00 per call/transport of amma1/s to the Woodbury
Animal Shelter I request that "ExlnbIt A" now be made/attached to the contract and that
transporting multIple ammals on the same occasion IS at the rate of $35 00 per transport
Some extra tIme and precautlons are necessary when transporting ammals, wInch
may be aggressIve toward each other or are vulnerable because of therr SIZe or specIes.
Sincerely,
.
&"'7 d 8JJ
Larry L Buberl
.
!
.
.
.
EXHIBIT "A"
REIMBURSEMENT RATE
FOR
TRANSPORTING ANIMALS TO ANIMAL SHELTER
The follOWIng shall be the relmbusement rate for transportIng antmals to an approved
antmal shelter pursuant to the contract between the City of Stlllwater and Larry Huber!.
1 $25 00 each tlme for the transport of one (I) ammal
2. $35.00 each time for the transport of two (2) or more antmals at the same
tlme.
Jay L Kimble, Mayor
Larry Huber!
Dated
1999
.
MEMO
April 6, 1999
TO: Mayor and CIty Councll
FROM: Shawn Sanders 1~f)
Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Lake Street RaVIne PrOject (part of the Lily Lake project)
Project 9613
DISCUSSION:
.
Money IS appropnated for the State Cost Share for Project Grants to asSISt
communitIes and countIes In the state In the construction costs of special projects hke
ours The CIty IS reqwred to submIt an apphcatlon and have it reviewed and pnontIzed
by the local conservatIon board After theIr reVIew, It IS sent to the state board where the
decision IS made on whether our grant apphcation IS approved. One reqUIrement for
apphcatIon approval IS for the CIty to adopt a resolutlon as an agreement with the Soll
and Water ConservatIon dtstnct to comply with all regulatIons of the State Cost Share
Special Project Grant. Attached is a copy of the WashIngton County Soll and Water
ConservatIon DIStnCt's resolutlon entenng Into ajoInt apphcatlon for thIs grant
ThIs money would be used to help fund the cost of the Lily Lake project that IS
antICIpated to be constructed yet thIs year
RECOMMENDATION:
SInce an agreement IS a required for the apphcatIon process to proceed, staff
recommends that a resolutlon be adopted statlng that the CIty agrees to comply to all
regulations of the State Cost Share SpeCIal Project Grants upon approval of the grant
apphcatIon by the State Soll and Water Conservatlon Board.
ACTION REOUIRED.
If Councll deSIres to pursue thIS avenue of funding they should pass a motion
adopting Resolution No. 99--, RESOLUTION AGREEING TO JOINT
APPLICATION WITH THE SOIL AND WATER CONVERSATION DISTRICT
FOR THE STATE COST SHARE SPECIAL PROJECT GRANT FOR THE LAKE
STREET RAVINE (JOB NO. 9613)
.
RESOLUTION AGREEING TO JOINT APPLICATION WITH THE
SOIL AND WATER CONVERSATION DISTRICT FOR
THE STATE COST SHARE SPECIAL PROJECT GRANT
FORTHELAKESTREETRAVThffi
(JOB NO. 9613)
.
WHEREAS, a grant is available for special projects, such as the CIty'S Lake
Street Ravine project, from the MInnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)
through the WashIngton County Soil and Water Conservatlon DIStrict; and
WHEREAS, the CIty IS applyIng for State fundIng from the State Cost Share
SpecIal Project Grant from BWSR for the Fourth Street RaVIne Project; and
WHEREAS, a reqUIrement of the grant apphcatlon process IS that the CIty of
St1l1water agrees to ajoInt apphcatlon with the Washington County Soil & Water
Conservatlon DIStnCt as admmIstered by the MInnesota Board of Soil and Water
Resources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the CIty Councll of the City of
Stillwater, MInnesota that the CIty agrees to enter into ajoint application WIth the
WashIngton County Soll & Water DIStnCt for State Cost Share SpeCIal Project Grant.
Adopted by the CIty Councll of St1l1water thIs 6th day of Apnl, 1999
.
Jay KImble, Mayor
ATTEST'
Morh Weldon, CIty Clerk
.
.
EDWARD W. SIMONET, JR.
A1TORNEY AT LAW
PO.BOX 16
522 sounr FOUR11I S'I1lEEf
STILLWATER., MlNNESOTASD2
PHONE (612) 439-S787
FAX (612) 439-5SS9
March 30, 1999
City Council
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Gentlemen:
.
With reference to the request from John M. Schoenecker
concerning a street vacation on North First Street that you
will be considering on Tuesday, April 6, 1999, I wish to
inform you that Vergil R. Plattner and Beverly J. Plattner
do have a record interest therein. The Plattners will not
be able to be present at this hearing and they asked me to
represent them in the form of this letter.
The record interest includes Lot 5, Block 43, Carli &
Schulenberg's Addition to Stillwater which borders on North
Second Street and is not directly affected by the proposed
vacation. They also own Lot 2, except the North 37 feet
thereof, of said Block and Plat, which borders on North First
Street. At present this lot is nonconforming because of no
sewer and water. It would be a buildable lot if sewer and
water was extended on North First Street. For this reason
they would be directly affected if the vacation was granted
and do oppose a granting of this vacation.
QC y~urd:.JJ
Edward W. Simonet, Jr.
EWS:vlf
.
MEMORANDUM
.
TO: Mayor and Council
FR: City Coordinator
RE. AFSCME labor agreement and
Admin.Support/MIS Specialist
classification
DA: Apri12,1999
Discussion:
.
AFCSME labor aszreement
I am enclosing a draft of the agreement between the City of Stillwater and AFSCME
Council No. 14 for your review and approval. The agreement contains the following
changes:
1. Salary schedules.
A. Increased all salary schedules by 3% for each of the following years:
1999,2000 and 2001.
B. Also amended salary schedules for the following classifications:
1. Building Inspector- increased by 3% plus $140.00.
2. Parking Enforcement Officer - increased to equal wage schedule of
Janitor.
3. Admin. Support/MIS Specialist - established new schedule for
modified classification of Rose Holman.
2. Longevity schedules.
A. Increased longevity schedule by 3% effective January 1,2000 (Appendix
B-2
B. Modified longevity schedules for Building Inspector and Parking
Enforcement Officer (to be consistent with longevity pay for similar wage
and established new schedule for Admin. Support Specialist.
3. Hospital/medical insmance.
A. Increased contribution to $418.00 per month for 1999 and $25.00 or 50%
of increase in premiwns for 2000 and 2001, whichever is greater based on
the higher cost insurance plan.
Admin. Suoport/MIS Soecialist
In regards to the modified classification for Rose Holman, the duties and responsibilities
for this employee have changed over the past few months. Rose has been assigned duties
and responsibilities that are similar to that of a MIS specialist. The attached revised
position description describes in more detail the nature of the changes.
. The most significant additions to her position is the responsibility for administering the
Local Access Network (LAN), installing computers, troubleshooting computers, training
employees in the use of computers and staying abreast of technological changes in
information systems. Rose would still retain all of the duties and responsibilities .
associated with the Secretary position. (Note: Due to the delay in getting pay equity point
values for the positIon and in determIning other factors related to the position, I am
recommending that the pay for the modified classification be retroactIve to January 1,
1999 Rose has been performing these duties since at least that date.)
Recommendation:
1. Council adopt resolutIon approving revised position descnption for AdmInistratIve
Support/MIS Specialist (consent agenda).
2. Council adopt resolution approving AFSCME labor agreement (consent agenda).
4(A-
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
AMENDING POSITION DESCRIPTION AND SALARY FOR ROSE HOLMAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City CouncIl of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, that
effective January 1, 1999, the position description for Rose Holman is hereby amended to
be Administration Support/MIS Specialist and that the said Rose Holman shall receive a
salary beginning at step 2 (six month) of the salary schedule for the position as stated in
the labor agreement between the City of Stillwater and AFSCME Counci114 dated
January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001.
Adopted by Council this 6dt day of April, 1999.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATIEST:
. Modi Weldon, City Clerk
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
APPROVING 1999-2001 LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF
STILL WATER AND AFSCME COUNCIL 14
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, MInnesota, that the
1999-20011abor agreement between the City of Stillwater and AFSCME CouncIl 14 is
hereby approved, and the Mayor and appropriate City staff are directed to sign said
agreement.
Adopted by Council this 6dt day of April, 1999
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Morli Weldon, City Clerk
.
.
.
'r'
CITY OF STILLWATER
posmON DESCRIYI10N
p.on Title:
Department:
Administrative SupportlMIS Specialist
Administration
Accountable to:
City Clerk
Position Supervised'
None
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
Responsible for the perfonnance of moderately complex, difficult, and varied clerical duties which require judgment based on
knowledge gained through experience. Provides clerical support to departments as assigned.
Responsible for daily computer operations, setting up new computers, maintaining Novell and Windows NT networks, assisting
and training computer users, assisting in the installation of new computer systems, maintaining telephone systems, and
recommending and implementing new technology; wmk is generally performed under limited direction from Administrative
Assistant.
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS
Uses windows-based word processing and spreadsheet computer applications to t}'pe letters, memorandums, spreadsheets, reports,
fonns, charts, notices, bulletins, meeting agendas and minutes and records from rough drafts, dictating machines, verbal
instructions or procedures.
pL a variety of moderately complex clerical tasks such as compiling, calculating and preparing special reports, maintaining
records, processing index cards.
Provides clerical support for Human Resources as neCessary.
Performs a variety of registration, licensing and permit issuance and related duties including processing new and renewed liquor ,
and tobacco licenses and maintaining a database.
Maintains established classification system for filing including maintaining and merging database, assisting with maintenance of
records according to data retention schedule and maintaining file storage areas.
Maintains all established agreement and contract files including ensuring that the City has a fully executed copy and maintaining
database.
Assists the City Clerk in all election activities including preparing documentation and legal notices, typing and editing training
materials, training election judges, maintaining database, maintaining equipment and assisting at polling locations.
Provides secondary backup coverage of reception desk including answering and routing incoming calls, routine assistance to the
public, answering inquiries, and processing applications for dog licenses, parking pennits and bike registrations and cashiering
and receiving incoming monies.
Prepares and distributes Council meeting infonnation including copying and preparing Council packets, typing and tracking
~*tions,. assisting with the preparation of agenda, and keeping staff informed of deadlines for submitting information and
m...g mmutes.
FINAL DRAFT
12/29/1998
&sists with the maintenance of office equipment and building including phone system, voice mail, fax & copier machines,
postage machme, and problems related to the maintenance of the building.
Performs tasks to maintain City owned vehicles including ensuring that emission tests are completed, processing registration of
licenses, titles and tabs, maintaining database, and reporting current vehicle information to the insurance company.
.
Performs special projects as assigned.
Takes minutes at City Council meetings in the City Clerk's absence.
Network Administration
Administers the local area network (LAN), including but not limited to:
Keep accurate and up to date documentation on the LAN
Add new users to the network
Maintain security/privacy and check for improper log on
Perform system backups/restores
Manage computer resources such as disk space so adequate storage is available to run jobs and insure data integnty
Isolate problems in the LAN
Assist in developing hardware and software standards
Monitor LAN to ensure the network is available to all users and resolve network problems. Solve network problems as
they occur and proactively address potential network problems.
Install or assist service installation of all computer software, hardware, and peripheral LAN components.
Maintains inventory of all computers and supplies.
Keeps current with information on hardware and software components of the LAN.
Coordinates hardware and software upgrades as directed and ensure software and hardware compatibility.
Investigates the cause of software and hardware problems and coordinates adjustments and repairs. IdentifY options for hard.
and software problem resolution.
Assists in developing and utilizes various procedures and controls to provide accuracy, security, product quality, standardization
and operational efficiency in accordance with the law and City policies.
Stays abreast of new developments in information management technology and information systems.
Provides assistance in the analysis and recommends new or improved uses of information management technology within the
City; in researching and make recommendations for acquisitions of computer hardware and software to meet operations
requirements; and during systems studies and review progress of computer systems applications.
Assists in the design and implementation of computerized reports for various applications.
Assists in the selection and monitoring of vendors and consultants.
Plan and coordinate the use of databases among City departments.
Analyze user needs and make recommendations concerning infonnation systems budget items for all departments.
Monitors and maintains established maintenance contracts on computer equipment
Provides training or assists in coordinating training for computer users as necessary for procedures and programs specific to the
City of Stillwater. .
Recommends and implements proper cabling solutions for City-wide systems.
FINAL DRAFT
12/29/1998
Frepares" a "procedure manual for step by step LAN operations, including a problem log of system and software difficulties and
_ corrective actions.
Telephone and Voice Mail
.lrouble shoot telephone and voice mail problems and schedule repairs as necessary.
_oordinate new user set up, new equipment/phone lines as directed.
Train employees on phone and voice mail systems.
Make changes to voice mail and phone systems as directed.
Performs other dutIes and assumes other responsibilities as are apparent or delegated.
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential duty satisfactorily. The requirements listed
below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable
individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
EDUCA nON AND EXPERIENCE
Preferred Oualifications
Minimum High school graduate or equivalent and post-secondary courses in twing and commercial/secretarial subjects and three
to five years experience in responsible clerical work. Considerable knowledge of and experience with personal computer
software, including: Windows, spreadsheet, word-processing applications and computer networks. Ability to type 60 words per
minute.
AA degree in computer science, management information systems or related field or proof of coursework applicable to the City's
n. or equivalent work experience.
KNOWLEDGE. SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Skilled in the typing of l~ documents and reports, etc.
Considerable knowledge of English, spelling, punctuation, arithmetic and vocabulary.
Knowledge of general office practices and procedures.
Knowledge and experience in transcn"bing from dictation equipment
Ability to work independently and use good judgment without requiring immediate supervision. ...
Ability to show organization in completing work assignments and performance of duties
Ability to understand and cany out moderately complex oral and written instructions
Ability to deal with the public in a tactful and courteous manner.
Knowledge of modem office equipment, procedures and clerical practices and procedures.
Knowledge of computer operating systems, including network management, trouble-shooting, security, hardware and software
needs, and reporting.
Kn.ledge of PC hardware and software installation, trouble-shooting, setup, configuration, repair and environment
-\
FINAL DRAFT
12/29/1998
K....lowledge of and skilled in the operation of personal computers including but not limited to knowledge of Windows, and word
processing and spreadsheet programs such as Microsoft Word, Access, and Excel.
Ability to work effectively and cooperatively with other employees, vendors and agencies.
SPECIAL REOUIREMENTS
Experience in the operatIon of personal computers including knowledge of Windows, and word processing and spreadsheet .
programs such as Microsoft Word, Access, and Excel.
Experience In a techmcal computer support position.
Experience troubleshooting computer hardware and software problems.
Expenence In a wide variety of computer software packages and working with hardware.
TOOLS AND EOUlPMENT USED
Communications switchboard, including computer aided systems; personal computer and word processing software including the
Microsoft Office Suite (Word, Excel, Access, Outlook); copy machine; fax machine; and microfilm reader.
WORK ENVIRONMENT
The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the
essentlal functions of this job. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the
essential functions.
The noise level in the work environment is usually quiet
EXAMPLESOFPERFORMANCEC~
Ability to carry out assigned tasks in an efficient, tImely and accurate manner with little or no supervision.
.
AbIlity to maintain records and files to prepare reports from such record.
Ability to make accurate arithmetic computatIons.
Ability to follow procedures and practices.
Skill in the operation of a typewriter, dictating/transcribing equipment and personal computer.
Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with other employees and the public and to deal with public
relation problems courteously and tactfully.
SELECTION GUIDELINES
Formal apphcatIon, rating of educatIon and experience; oral interview and reference check; job related tests may be required.
The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of
specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the
position.
The job description does not constitute an employment agreement between the employer and employee and is subject
to change by the employer as the needs of the employer and requirements of the job change. .
- ~- \
FINAL DRAFT
12/29/1998
.
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF STILLWATER
AND
LOCAL 517
COUNCIL NO. 14 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERAL OF
STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
.
.
JANUARY 1, 1999 - DECEMBER 31,2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.
Article Title Paae
I Purpose of Agreement 1
II Recognition 1
III Union Secunty 1
IV Hours of Work 2
V Part Time Employees 3
VI Holidays 3
VII Sick Leave 4
VIII Vacation 6
IX Severance Pay 6
X Leaves 7
XI Wages 8
XII Overtime 9 .
XIII Gnevance Procedures 9
XIV Senlonty 11
XV Work Force 12
XVI Insurance 12
XVII General ProvIsions 13
XVIII Savings Clause 14
XIX Employer Authonty 14
XX Employee Rights 14
XXI DIscipline 15
XXII Waiver 15
XXIII Terrmnatlon 16
AppendiX A-1 1999 salary schedule 17
AppendiX A-2 2000 salary schedule 18
.
.
.
.
Table of Contents (continued)-
Appendix A-3
Appendix B-1
Appendix B-2
Exhibit C
2001 salary schedule
1999 Longevity schedule
2000 Longevity schedule
Working out of Classification
19
20
21
22
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT.
This agreement IS entered Into between the City of Stillwater hereafter called the
EMPLOYER, and Local No 517, American Federation of State, County and MUnicipal
Employees, hereinafter called the UNION
.
The Intent of and purpose of thIs agreement IS to'
1 1 Establish certaIn hours, wages and other condItIons of employment,
1 2 Establish procedures for the resolutIon of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT'S
interpretatIon and/or application,
1 3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties, and
1 4 Place In written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditIons of
employment for the duratIon of this agreement.
The EMPLOYER and the UNION, through this AGREEMENT, continue their dedication to
the hIghest quality public servIce. Both parties recognize thIs AGREEMENT as a pledge
of thIs decisIon.
ARTICLE II. RECOGNITION.
.
2 1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative In a Unit defined
as'
All employees of the City of Stillwater who are public employees
withIn the meaning of Minnesota Statutes 179A.03, Subd 14
excludIng supervisory and confidentIal employees, essential
employees, employees of the Stillwater Public Library Board and all
employees of the Public Works Department and Parks and
Recreation Department
2 2 In the event the EMPLOYER and the UNION are unable to agree as to the inclUSIon
or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the
Bureau of Mediation Services for determInation
ARTICLE III. UNION SECURITY.
3 1 The Employer agrees to deduct the Union dues from the pay of those employees
1
.
.
who individually request in writing that such deductions be made. The amounts to
be deducted shall be certified to the Employer by a designated representative of the
Umon, and the aggregate deductions of all employees shall be remitted together
With an Itemized statement, to the designated representative by the first of the
succeeding month, after such deductions are made. Any fair share fee collected
shall be processed in accordance With Minnesota Statutes 179.65, Subd 2.
32
The Umon agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all
claims, suits, orders or Judgments brought or issued against the Employer as a
result of any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the proviSions of thiS
article.
3.3
The UNION may designate certain employees from the bargaining unit to act as
stewards and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice.
34
The EMPLOYER agrees to make space available on the EMPLOYER bulletin board
for the posting of official UNION notice(s) and announcements.
ARTICLE IV. HOURS OF WORK
4.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the EMPLOYER. The normal workday for
a full-time employee shall be eight (8) hours The normal workweek for a full-time
employee shall be forty (40) hours, Monday through Fnday.
.
4 2 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some
employees on a daily, weekly, or seasonal or annual basis other than the normal
work schedule. The Employer will give seven (7) days advance notice to the
employees effected by the establishment of workdays different from the employee's
normal work schedule.
4.3 All employees shall be scheduled a one-half (112) hour unpaid lunch break.
4.4 All employees work schedules shall provide for at least one 15-minute rest period
during each one-half shift. The rest period shall be scheduled at the middle of each
one-half shift, whenever possible. Employees who are authorized to work beyond
their regular quitting time shall receive a rest period if one is necessary due to
length of overtime authorization.
4.5 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but
not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet or breakdown of municipal equipment or
faCilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee
working other than the normal workday be scheduled to work more than the
workday Each employee has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if
requested unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working.
2
.
ARTICLE V. PART TIME EMPLOYEES.
.
5 1 Part-time employees shall be eligible to earn all employee benefits on a pro rata
basIs according to the following schedule provided that such employees work
regularly scheduled hours in each pay penod, as opposed to being subject to call
or to work when available.
Average Work Hours Per Week
Pro Rate Percentaae of Benefits
14 - 24
24 - 35
36 or more
50 percent
75 percent
100 percent
5 2 Part-time employees shall be paid an hourly rate computed by dividing the full-time
annual rate for which they would be eligible by 2,080 hours.
5.3 Part-time employees who become full-time employees shall be given credit for a
forty (40) hour workweek for determining the salary step based on the length of
service.
5.4 Employees employed by the employer on a seasonal or temporary basis for not
more that 67 work days per calendar year either in a full time or part time capacity .
(more than 14 hours per week) will be paid a rate to be determined by employer for
the term of their employment. Such employees Will not be eligible for any benefits
under thiS agreement.
ARTICLE VI. HOLIDAYS.
6.1 Holidays with pay are defined as.
New Year's Day January 1
Martin Luther King Day The third Monday in January
Washington and Lincoln's Birthday The third Monday in February
Memorial Day The last Monday in May
Independence Day July 4
Labor Day The first Monday in September
Veteran's Day November 11
Thanksgiving Day The 4th Thursday in November
Day after ThanksgIVIng The fourth Friday in November
Chnstmas Day December 25
Floating Holiday One per year
Christmas Eve Day or New Year's Eve Day December 24 or December 31
Employees shall be eligible for holiday pay proVided they are on paid status on the
3
.
.
day before and the day after the holiday.
When a holiday falls on Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be observed as the
holiday. When a holiday falls on Sunday, the follOWing Monday shall be observed
as the holiday
62
63
Christmas Eve or New Year's Eve will be a split work force. The schedule for these
two (2) holidays to be approved by the Department Head
Dunng the first calendar year of employment any new employee must be hired
before June 30th to be eligible to receive the floating holiday. Any new employee
hired after June 30th shall be eligible to receive one-half (1/2) floating holiday
64
ARTICLE VII. SICK LEAVE.
7 1 Sick leave shall be earned by full-time employees at the follOWing rates:
a.
b.
c.
d.
. e.
f.
g.
h
i.
From six (6) months to one (1) year, one (1) week at full pay.
From one (1) year to two (2) years, one (1) additional day per month.
From two (2) to five (5) years, four (4) weeks at full pay; nine weeks at half
pay
From (5) to ten (10) years, thirteen (13) weeks at full pay, thirteen (13) weeks
at half pay
From ten (10) to fifteen (15) years, thirteen (13) weeks at full pay; thirty-nine
(39) weeks half pay
From fifteen (15) to twenty years, twenty-six (26) weeks at full pay, twenty-six
(26) weeks at half pay.
From twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) years, thirty-nine (39) weeks at full pay,
thirteen (13) weeks at half pay.
Over twenty-five (25) years, 52 weeks full pay.
A week shall be considered to be five (5) working days. Sick leave benefits
shall accrue on the January 1 st immediately preceding the anniversary date
of employment.
7 2 Sickness disability benefits usage shall be subject to the following conditions:
.
a.
b.
An employee may use the full entitlement only once annually
Any days used by an employee must be replaced at the following earning
rate: employees shall earn sickness disability leave at the rate of sixteen (16)
hours for each month worked
Sickness disability leave time cannot be earned during the time an employee
is on sick leave. Sick leave earned back shall be figured on a pro rata baSIS
each month With no earn back of leave for that portion of sick leave used
dunng the month.
c.
4
d.
Sickness disability leave time shall be earned as a replacement for used
leave time by only those employees who have utilized the benefit Sick leave
used last shall be replaced first
.
7 3 Sick leave may be authorized for the following reasons with the limitatIons as
speCIfied:
a. For Illness or InJUry, dental or medIcal treatment for the employee SIck leave
usage by the employee may be subject to approval by the Department Head
The Employer may require venfication for an absence of three days or more,
from a recognized medical authority attesting to the necessity of the leave,
ability to return to duty or other informatIon deemed necessary.
b In the event a pregnant employee elects to resign her employment because
of pregnancy, such employee will be paid for accumulated sick leave up to
but not exceeding 15 work days.
c. Sick leave use for serious Illness of the employee's spouse, minor chIldren
or employee's parents living In the household shall be as established In the
CIty'S personnel policy.
7 4 Should Illness occur whIle an employee IS on vacation the period of illness may be
charged to sick leave and the charge to vacation reduced accordingly. An .
employee requestIng such a change may be reqUired to submit a written statement
from a phYSIcian attesting to Illness and the period of dIsability.
7.5 Any employee receIving worker's compensation benefits because of Job connected
injUry or sickness shall, if he/she assIgns hIS check to the City receIVe full wages for
that period. Or, if any employee IS receiVing worker's compensation benefits and
does not assign hislher check, he/she will be paId for the difference between
worker's compensation allowance and hlslher regular weekly pay
Sick leave shall then be figured on a prorated baSIS WIth no deduction of leave
beIng made for that portion of the employee's absence which is covered by worker's
compensation Insurance
Sick leave will be suspended after benefits have been exhausted; however, an
employee who has fulfilled all of the requirements for a vacation which has not been
taken may request vacation pay dUring disabIlity. After all SIck leave benefits have
been exhausted, any disabled employee may apply in Writing for an authOrized
leave of absence WIthout pay; prOVIded that the penod of such leave of absence
when added to the period during which benefits have been paId shall not exceed
one (1) year Such application shall be accompanied by a physician's certIficate
stating that such dIsabled employee has not been able to return to work. Upon
5
.
.
.
.
return to active employment, the employee shall retain all accumulated service
credit for time worked prior to hislher disability, but shall receive no service credit
for the period of absence.
ARTICLE VIII. VACATION.
8.1 All full-time employees shall be entitled to the following vacation schedule:
From 0 through 12 months of employment
From 1 year through 4 years of employment
After 4 years through 10 years of employment
After 10 years through 15 years of employment
After 15 years
5/6 days per month
10 days per year
15 days per year
20 days per year
One (1) additional day for each
year up to twenty years for a
maximum of 25 days.
A day is equal to eight (8) hours.
8.2 Vacations shall be granted at the time requested by the employee upon approval
of Department Head. If the nature of the work makes it necessary to limit the
number of employees on vacation at the same time, the employee with the greater
departmental semority shall be given his choice of vacation period.
8.3 If a holiday occurs during the calendar week in which a vacation is taken by an
employee, the employee's vacation used shall be reduced by one work day
8.4 Any employee who is laid off, discharged, retired or separated from the service of
the Employer for any reason, prior to taking his vacation, shall be compensated in
cash for the unused vacation he has accumulated at the time of separation.
8.5 Vacation may be taken in increments of less than a day with the approval of the
Department Head.
8.6 Vacation time can be accumulated up to eighty (80) hours and used in the following
year. Vacation in excess of eighty (80) hours at the end of the year shall be paid
on the second (2nd) payday in January at the rate of pay in effect at the end of the
previous year.
8.7 Vacation shall accrue on January 1 st immediately preceding the anniversary date
of employment.
ARTICLE IX. SEVERANCE PAY.
9.1 All permanent employees who leave the employment of the City because of
retirement, resignation or death shall receive pay for 100 percent of unused accrued
6
vacation and compensation time
.
9 2 All permanent employees who retire due to age or physical disability and are eligible
to receive PERA retirement benefits, shall receive one-half of unused disability
benefits providing he or she had been employed with the City In a permanent, full
time position for a period of not less than ten (10) years.
9.3 In the event of death whIle stili employed, the surviving spouse, If any, of If no
surviving spouse, minor children, If any, or employee's estate shall be entitled to
such severance pay in the same amount as though such employee had retired due
to age or physical dIsabIlity as above provided
ARTICLE x. LEAVES.
10.1 Funeral Leave
a.
An employee shall be granted a paid funeral leave of up to three (3) working
days In each case of death of the immedIate famIly. ImmedIate famIly shall
be defined as the employee's spouse, children, parents, siblings,
grandparents, grandchildren and shall include parents and sIblings of the
employee's spouse Such leave shall not be deducted from any other
accumulated leave. Additional leave days may be granted by the Employer,
should the circumstances warrant the additional days.
.
b One day with pay shall be allowed in the event an employee is selected to
be a pallbearer in a funeral.
c. Emergency leave with pay for relatives not specified In 10 1 a. shall be as
specified In the City'S personnel policy
10 2 Employees shall be granted a leave of absence WIth pay any time they are reqUired
to report to jury duty or JUry service All fees shall be returned to the Employer
except those paid for duty on the Employee's normal day off and those for meals
and mileage. Any hours not on jury duty shall be worked
10 3 Notice An employee using jury duty or funeral leave shall notIfy the Employer of
such intent as soon as the necessity of such leave is known
10.4 Unpaid leaves for a limited pened, not to exceed SIX months, may be granted for any
reasonable purpose, and such leaves may be extended or renewed for any
reasonable period. Employees shall submit a wntten request for personal leave to
the City CounCil All personal leaves shall be without compensation
1.
ADDllcation for Leave. Any request for a leave of absence without pay shall
7
.
.
be submitted in wnting by the Employee to the Employer or his designee
The request shall state the reason the leave IS being requested and the
length of time off the employee desires.
2.
Employees shall be returned to the position in their department if the leave
is for sixty (60) days or less and to their classification in their department If
the leave is in excess of sixty (60) days
10 5 Union Business. Employees elected to a Local Umon office or selected by the
Umon to do work which takes them from their employment with the Employer, shall
at the written request of the Union be granted a leave of absence
10 6 Maternltv Maternity leave, not to exceed six (6) months, shall be granted at the
request of the Employee.
10 7 Educational. Leave of absence shall be granted in accordance With the personnel
regulations.
ARTICLE XI. WAGES.
11 1 Employees shall be paid in accordance with the attached salary and longevity pay
schedules marked Appendix A-1 (Monthly Salary Schedule) and Appendix B
. (Monthly Longevity Pay Schedule).
11 2 Incumbent employees will move into the salary schedule in accordance With their
length of service.
11 3 An Employee who is called to duty during the employee's scheduled off-duty time
shall receive a mlnumum of two (2) hours pay at one-half (1 %) times the
employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a scheduled shift for duty
does not qualify for the two (2) hour minimum.
11.4 All permanent, full-time employees shall receive monthly longevity pay according
to Appendix B Longevity pay shall be based on employee's length of service With
the Employer.
11 5 Employees who are required to work exclUSively at a higher classification in this
bargaining unit shall receive working out of classification pay as provided for in
Exhibit "e".
11.6 In the event an employee is promoted to a higher classification, the employees
compensation shall be Increased by 5% to the next highest step of the higher
classification
.
8
ARTICLE XII. OVERTIME.
12 1 Time and one-half the employee's regular hourly rate of pay shall be paid for work
performed in excess of the normal workweek of forty (40) hours eompensated
leave shall be considered worked hours for the purpose of determining eligibility for
overtime compensation
.
12.2 Distribution. Overtime work shall be distnbuted as equally as practical to qualified
employees.
123 Overtime shall be calculated to the nearest fifteen (15) minutes
12 4 Employees who elect to take compensatory time off In lieu of overtime pay, shall
earn compensatory time at the rate of time and one-half eompensatory time off
shall be scheduled at the mutual convenience of the employer and employee
Employees shall not be allowed to accrue more than forty (40) hours of
compensatory time or carry over more than forty (40) hours of compensatory time
Into the next calendar year Without permission of employee's supervisor.
ARTICLE XIII. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES.
13 1 Definition of Gnevance A gnevance IS defined as a dispute or disagreement as to
the Interpretation or application of specific terms and conditions of this agreement .
An employee has the right to have Union representation.
13 2 Oraanlzatlon ReDresentatlves. The elty will recognize representatives deSignated
by the Union as the grievance representative of the bargaining Unit having the
duties and responsibilities established by thiS article.
13 3 ProcesslnO of Grievance The aggrieved employee's representative shall be
allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance IS
Investigated and presented to the Employer dUring normal working hours proVided
the employee and employee representatIVe has notified the deSignated supervisor
13 4 Grievance Procedure Grievances shall be processed In the following manner
Step 1
The Union Steward, with or Without the employee, shall take up the
grievance or dispute with the employee's Immediate supervisor Within
ten (10) days of the employee's knowledge of ItS occurrence The
supervisor shall respond within five (5) workdays
Step 2.
If the grievance is not settled in Step 1, It shall be referred in writing
to the eity eouncll, or their deSignee, Within ten (10) working days
9
.
.
Step 3.
Step 4.
.
.
after the designated supervisor-s answer in Step 1. The Employer
representative shall discuss the gnevance within ten (10) working
days with the employee and the Union representative at a time
mutually agreeable to the parties. If the grievance is settled as a
result of such a meeting, the settlement shall be reduced in writing
and signed by the Employer representative and the Union. If no
settlement is reached, the Employer representative shall give written
answer to the Union within ten (10) days following their meeting
If the grievance IS not settled In Step 2 and the Union desires to
appeal, It shall be referred by the Union In wntlng to the elty eouncll
or their designee within ten (10) working days after the Employer-s
response in Step 2. A meeting between the elty eouncil or their
designee, and the Unton shall be held at a time mutually agreeable to
the parties. If the grievance is settled as a result of such a meeting,
the settlement shall be reduced to writing and signed by the eaty
eouncil or their designee and the Unton. If no settlement IS reached,
the elty eouncil or their designee shall give written answer to the
Union within ten (10) working days following the meeting
Arbitration. If the grievance is not settled in accordance with the
foregoing procedure, either party may refer the grievance to
arbitration within ten (10) working days after the Union's receipt of the
Employer-s written answer in Step 3, as provided in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 179.70 The selectton of an arbitrator shall be made
in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of
Grievances" as established by the Public Employment Relations
Board.
a. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify,
ignore, add to or subtract from the terms and conditions of the
contract. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the
specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the eity and the
Employee and the Union, and shall have no authority to make
a decision on any other issue not so submitted
b.
The arbitrator-s decision shall be submitted in writing within
thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submiSSion
of briefs, by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties
agree to an extension. The arbitrator shall be without power
to make decIsions contrary to or inconsistent with or modifying
or varying in any way, the application of laws, ordinances or
rules and regulations haVing the force and effect of law. The
decision shall be based solely on the arbitrator-s interpretation
10
/
of application of the express terms of the Agreement and to the
facts of the grievance presented. The parties may, by mutual
written agreement agree to submit more than one grievance to
the arbitrator provided that each gnevance will be considered
as a separate issue and each on its own merit.
.
c The fees and expenses for the arbltrator-s services and
proceedings shall be borne equally by the elty and the Union,
provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating
its own representative and witnesses. If either party deSires a
verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a
record to be made, provided it pays for such a record If both
parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the costs
shall be shared equally
13 5 Waiver. If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, It shall
be considered ''waived''. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the
specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled
on the basis of the Employer-s last answer. If the Employer does not answer a
grievance or an appeal therefore within the specified time limits or any agreed to
extension, the employee and the Union may elect to treat the gnevance as denied
at that step and appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step
may be extended by mutual written agreement of the City and the Union in each
step The term "working days" as used in this Article shall mean the days Monday
through Friday, inclusive, exclusive of holidays.
.
13 6 Record. All documents, communications and records dealing with a gnevance shall
be filed separately from the personnel files of the involved employee(s).
ARTICLE XIV. SENIORITY.
14.1 Senlonty means an employee's length of continuous service with the eity and by job
classification.
14.2 On January 1 and July 1, the Employer shall establish seniority lists showing the
continuous service of each employee. A copy of the seniority lists shall be fumished
to the Union when it is posted.
14.3 Breaks In Continuous Service. An employee's continuous service record shall be
broken by voluntary resignation, discharge for just cause and retirement.
14 4 Probationarv Deriods
11
.
I
.
1. All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a SIX (6) month
probationary period.
2 All employees wit 5erve a six (6) month probationary penod in any Job
classification in which the employee has not served a probationary period.
3. At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired
employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer
ARTICLE XV. WORK FORCE.
15 1 Any vacancy or newly created position in a department will be posted In a
conspicuous place in all departments where employees within the bargaining Unit
work. Such notice shall be posted for at least five (5) workdays prior to filling such
vacancy or newly created position. Whenever practicable, vacancies shall be filled
from among the present employees in the department, giVing first consideration to
seniority and qualification. If it becomes necessary in filling a vacancy to bypass an
employee's sentority, reasons for said denial shall be given in writing to such
employee. No vacancy shall be reduced in classification by the Employer without
first being offered in the bidding process.
.
15 2 A reduction of the work force will be accomplished on the baSIS of seniority and job
claSSification provided all probationary and temporary employees in the
classificatlon(s) where the layoff occurs are laid off first. In the event of layoffs or
a reduction of the work force, employees may exercise their seniority rights to a Job
classification of a higher, the same or lower pay within the bargaining unit provided
that all job relevant qualifications between employees are equal.
15 3 Employees shall be recalled from layoff according to senionty and job classification.
No new employee shall be hired for a job classification which a layoff has occurred
until all employees on layoff status within that job classification have been given
ample opportunity to return to work within twenty-four (24) months of said layoff.
The eity will notify employees on layoff to return to work by registered mail at the
employee's last recorded address The employee must return to work within three
(3) weeks of receipt of this notice in order to be eligible for reemployment.
ARTICLE XVI. INSURANCE.
16.1 A. Effective January 1, 1999, the Employer will contribute up to Four Hundred
Eighteen dollars ($418.00) per month per Employee for group health insurance
Including dependent coverage.
B. Effective January 1, 2000, the Employer will increase its contribution by Twenty-
five Dollars ($25.00) or Fifty Percent (50%) of the increase in premiums, whichever
is greater, based on the higher cost hospital/medical plan.
12
.
e Effective January 1, 2001, the Employer will increase its contribution by Twenty-
five Dollars ($25 00) or Fifty Percent (50%) of the Increase in premiums, whichever .
IS greater, based on the higher cost hospital/medical plan.
16 2 The elty shall provide a $20,000 life Insurance policy for all permanent employees
163 Employees hired prior to December 31, 1988 and who retire after 10 continuous
years of elty service and who are eligible to receive PERA benefits shall be allowed
to continue their medical Insurance coverage at elty expense until their death If
said employee proVided dependent coverage for his/her spouse prior to his/her
retirement, the elty shall pay said dependent's coverage until death.
164 Dental. Ten dollars ($10.00) of the maximum may be utilized toward dental
Insurance
ARTICLE XVII. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
17 1 Neither the Union nor the Employer shall diSCriminate against any employee
because of Union membership or nonmembership, nor because of age, race, creed,
gender, color, religiOUS belief, sexual or affectional preference.
17.2 The Employer agrees to recognize stewards and altemates as certified by the Union
subJect to the follOWing stipulations
1
Employee Union officers shall be granted a reasonable amount of time off
Without pay dunng work hours for union bUSiness, provided they notify their
deSignated supervisor
.
2. Nonemployee representatives of the Unaon shall be permitted to come on the
premises of the Employer for the purpose of investigating and diSCUSSing
gnevances If they first notify the Employer-s designee and proVided the Union
representative does not Interfere with the work of the employees
17 4 Work Rules. The Employer shall have the right to establish work rules and
personnel poliCies which shall be eqUitably and uniformly applied. Prior to the
effective date, any work rule or policy shall be posted on all bulletin boards for a
period of ten (10) consecutIVe workdays In addition, copies shall be furnished to
the Unaon, and when effective, all existing rules and poliCies shall be furnished to
all employees New employees shall be furnished a copy of all work rules when
hired
17.5 elty Will provide all training reqUired by the City at elty expense
17.6 Any subJect matter placed in the Employee's personnel file which could be
detrimental to the Employee's future promotion, transfer, present or future
13
.
.
.
.
employment, shall be served upon the Employee In writing Such matter shall be
a proper subJect for the grievance procedure All materials In any Employee's file
shall be available for the Employee's inspection.
17 7 Mileage The elty will reimburse Employees for the use of personal automobiles for
authonzed elty business at the rate established by the IRS and as amended from
time to time.
17 8 The Employer shall provide required Uniform articles and eqUipment to
Secretary/Dispatchers and Community Service Officers.
ARTICLE XVIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE.
Should any article, section or portion thereof, of the Agreement be held unlawful
and unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision of the court
shall apply only to the specified article, section or portion thereof directly speCified
In the decision; upon the issuance of such a decision, the parties agree immediately
to negotiate a substitute for the invalidated article, section or portion thereof.
ARTICLE XIX. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY.
19 1 The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all
manpower, facilities and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and
amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify
the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of
personnel; to establish work schedules; and to perform any inherent managerial
functions not speCifically limited by this Agreement
19 2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by
this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify,
establish or eliminate.
19.3 Prior to contracting out or subcontracting any work performed by Employees covered by
the Agreement, the eity agrees to meet and confer with the Union to discuss possible ways
and means to minimize the elimination of positions covered by this Agreement
ARTICLE XX. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS.
20.1 Employees shall have the right, freely and without fear to penalty or reprisal by the
Employer to join and participate in the Union.
20.2 Employees chOOSing to participate In the Internal affairs of the Union as an officer, steward
or other capacity, may do so Without fear of reprisal by the Employer for such participation
consistent with the Employee's Job duties and responsibilities and the prOVisions of thiS
14
contract
.
ARTICLE XXI. DISCIPLINE.
21 1 The EMPLOYER will diSCipline employees for Just cause only DISCipline will be "lone of
the following forms
a) Oral repnmand,
b) Written repnmand;
c) Suspension,
d) Demotion, or
e) Discharge
21 2 Suspensions, demotions, and discharges will be in written form
21 3
written reprimands, notices of suspension, notices of demotion and notices of discharge
which are to become part of an Employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged
by signature of the Employee Employees and the UNION will receive a copy of such
reprimands and/or notices
214
Employees may examine their own Individual personnel files at reasonable times under the
direct supervision of the Employer
Employees Will not be questioned concemlng an investigation of the diSCiplinary actio.
unless the employee has been given an opportUnity to have a UNION representative
present at such questioning.
21 5
21 6 Grievances relating to thiS Article shall be initiated by the Union at step 3 of the
gnevance procedure under Article XIII (Grievance Procedures) of thiS Agreement
ARTICLE XXII. WAIVER.
ThiS Agreement shall represent the complete Agreement between the Union and the Employer
The parties acknowledge that dUring the negotiations which resulted In the Agreement, each had
the unlimited right and opportUnity to make requests and proposals With respect to any subject
or matter not removed by law from the area of collective bargaining, and that the complete
understandings and agreements amved at by the parties after the exercise of that right and
opportUnity are set forth In thiS Agreement Therefore, the Employer and the Union, for the life
of thiS Agreement, each voluntanly and unqualifiedly waives the right, and each agrees that the
other shall not be obligated to bargain colledlvely With respect to any subject or matter referred
to or covered by thiS Agreement or With resped to any subJect or matter not specifically referred
to or covered by thiS Agreement, even though such subject or matter may not have been Within
the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time that they negotiated or Signed
thiS Agreement
15
.
. ARTICLE XXIII. TERMINATION.
.
.
This Agreement shall be effectiVf .JS of the first day of January 1999 and remain In full force and
effect through the 31st day of December 12, 2001. It shall be automatically renewed from year
to year thereafter unless either party shall notify the other In writing by November 1 st that It
deSires to modify thiS Agreement. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect dUring the
penod of negotiations or until notice of termination of the Agreement IS provided to the other party
In the manner set forth In the following paragraph
In the event that either party deSires to terminate thiS Agreement, written notice must be given to
the other party not less than ten (10) days pnor to the deSired termination date The termmatlon
date shall not be before the anniversary date set forth In the preceding paragraph.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands this _ day of
,1999
FOR THE UNION
FOR THE CITY OF STILLWATER
eounctl No 14
Mayor
Local 517
elty elerk
16
APPENDIX A-1
.
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999
Part time Employees: After After After After
1040 2080 4160 6240
Entry Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employees: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
or or or or or
Entry 6 mos. 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years
Asst. Finance Director 3280 3485 3690 3895 4099
Sr. Account elerk 2497 2653 2809 2965 3121
Jr. Account elerk 2136 2269 2403 2536 2669
Secretary 2425 2577 2728 2880 3031
elerklTypist 2082 2212 2342 2472 2602
Secretary/Dispatcher II 2497 2653 2809 2965 3121 .
Secretary/Dispatcher I 2455 2608 2762 2915 3068
Building Inspector 2900 3082 3263 3444 3625
Asst. Bldg Inspector 2425 2577 2728 2880 3031
Janitor 1988 2112 2236 2360 2484
eso 2136 2269 2403 2536 2669
Assistant Planner 2327 2472 2618 2763 2908
Planner 2912 3094 3276 3458 3639
Parking Enforcement Off. 1988 2112 2236 2360 2484
eiviI Engineer 3361 3571 3781 3991 4201
Engineenng Tech. IV 3169 3367 3565 3763 3961
Engineering Tech. III 2829 3006 3183 3360 3536
Engineering Tech. II 2531 2689 2847 3005 3163
Admin. SupportlMlS Spec. 2695 2863 3032 3200 3368
Employees shall also receive longevity pay according to AppendiX B-1
17
.
.
APPENDIX A-2
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2000
Part time Employees After After After After
1040 2080 4160 6240
Entrv Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employees: Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
or or or or or
Entrv 6mos 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years
Asst Finance Director 3378 3589 3800 4011 4222
Sr. Account elerk 2572 2733 2894 3055 3215
Jr. Account elerk 2200 2338 2475 2613 2750
Secretary 2498 2654 2810 2966 3122
elerklTypist 2145 2279 2413 2547 2681
Secretary/Dispatcher II 2572 2733 2894 3055 3215
Secretary/Dispatcher I 2529 2687 2845 3003 3161
. Building Inspector 2988 3174 3361 3548 3734
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 2498 2654 2810 2966 3122
Janitor 2048 2176 2304 2432 2559
eso 2200 2338 2475 2613 2750
Assistant Planner 2397 2547 2697 2847 2996
Planner 3000 3187 3375 3562 3749
Parking Enforcement Off. 2048 2176 2304 2432 2559
elvll Engineer 3462 3678 3895 4111 4327
Englneenng Tech. IV 3264 3468 3672 3876 4080
Engineering Tech. III 2915 3097 3279 3461 3643
Engineering Tech. II 2607 2770 2933 3096 3258
Admin. Support/MIS Spec. 2776 2950 3123 3297 3470
Employees shall also receive longeVity pay according to Appendix B-2
.
18
APPENDIX A-3
.
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2001
Part time Employees After After After After
1040 2080 4160 6240
Entry Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employees Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5
or or or or or
Entrv 6mes 1 Year 2 Years 3Years
Asst. Finance Director 3480 3697 3915 4132 4349
Sr. Account elerk 2650 2816 2981 3147 3312
Jr Account elerk 2267 2409 2550 2692 2833
Secretary 2573 2734 2895 3056 3216
elerklTYPlst 2210 2348 2486 2624 2762
Secretary/Dispatcher II 2650 2816 2981 3147 3312
Secretary/Dispatcher I 2605 2767 2930 3093 3255 .
BUilding Inspector 3078 3270 3463 3654 3847
Asst. Bldg Inspector 2573 2734 2895 3056 3216
Janitor 2109 2241 2373 2505 2636
eso 2267 2409 2550 2692 2833
Assistant Planner 2469 2624 2778 2932 3086
Planner 3090 3283 3476 3669 3862
Parking Enforcement Off 2109 2241 2373 2505 2636
elvll Engineer 3566 3789 4012 4235 4457
Engineering Tech. IV 3363 3573 3783 3993 4203
Engineering Tech. III 3003 3191 3378 3566 3753
Engineering Tech II 2685 2853 3021 3189 3356
Admin SupportlMlS Spec 2860 3039 3218 3397 3575
Employees shall also receive longevity pay according to Appendix B-2
.
19
.
APPENDIX B-1
MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1999
After After After After
10,400 20,800 31,200 41,600
Part-time Employees: Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employee: 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years
Asst. Finance Director 79.00 159.00 238.00 285.00
Sr. Account elerk 58.00 115.00 173.00 206.00
Jr. Account elerk 49.00 101.00 150.00 181.00
. Secretary 57.00 113.00 170.00 202.00
elerklTypist 49.00 102.00 150.00 181.00
Secretary/Dispatcher II 58.00 115.00 173.00 206.00
Secretary/Dispatcher I 57.00 113.00 170.00 202.00
Building Inspector 70.00 140.00 210.00 252.00
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 57.00 113.00 170 00 202.00
Janitor 48.00 98.00 146.00 176.00
eso 49.00 101.00 150.00 181.00
Assistant Planner 57.00 113.00 170.00 202.00
Planner 70.00 140.00 210.00 252.00
Parking Enforcement Off. 48.00 98.00 146.00 176.00
eivil Engineer 81.00 163.00 244.00 291.00
Engineering Tech. IV 76.00 152.00 229.00 276.00
Engineering Tech. III 7000 140.00 210.00 252.00
Engineering Tech. II 62.00 124.00 186.00 217.00
Admin SupportlMlS spec. 6700 134.00 201.00 242 00
.
20
APPENDIX B-2
MONTHLY LONGEVITY PAY SCHEDULE
.
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2000
After After After After
10,400 20,800 31,200 41,600
Part-time Employees' Hours Hours Hours Hours
Full-time Employees. 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years
Asst Finance Director 82.00 164.00 246.00 294 00
Sr Account elerk 60.00 119.00 179.00 213 00
Jr. Account elerk 51.00 10500 155.00 187.00
Secretary 59.00 11700 176.00 209.00
elerkn"YPlst 51.00 106.00 155.00 187 00
Secretary/Dispatcher II 60.00 119.00 179.00 213.00
Secretary/Dispatcher I 59.00 117.00 176.00 209 00
Building Inspector 73.00 145.00 217.00 260.00
Asst. Bldg. Inspector 59.00 117.00 176 00 209.00
Janitor 50.00 101.00 151.00 182.00 .
eso 51.00 105.00 155 00 187.00
Assistant Planner 59.00 117 00 176.00 209 00
Planner 7300 145.00 21700 260.00
Parking Enforcement Off 50.00 101.00 151.00 182 00
eivil Engineer 84.00 168.00 252.00 300.00
Engineenng Tech. IV 79.00 157.00 236.00 285 00
Engineering Tech. III 7300 145 00 217.00 260.00
Engineering Tech. II 64.00 128.00 192.00 224.00
Admin Support/MIS Spec. 70.00 139.00 208.00 250.00
21
.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT C
MEMORANDUM
OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
THE CITY OF STILLWATER
AND
AFSCME COUNCIL 517
REGARDING WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION PAY
SUBJECT:
WORKING OUT OF eLASSIFleATION PAY
PURPOSE.
To define and delineate circumstances when an employee will receive
compensation for the performance of duties In a higher classification than he/she
normally performs.
APPLleABILlTY: The provisions of this policy apply to AFSeME eouncI1517 eity of Stillwater
employees
STATEMENT OF POlley AND UNDERSTANDING.
1. eompensation for working out of classification is provided as monetary recognition to an
employee for the assumption and performance of duties normally performed by an employee
of higher classification.
2 The assumption and performance of the duties of the higher claSSification must encompass
the full range of responsibilities of the higher classification This shall not apply to temporary
assignments which are made pursuant to pnor mutual agreement between the employee and
his or her immediate supervisor for the purpose of providing a training opportUnity to the
employee, for a mutually agreed upon period of time.
3 The performance of such duties must be for an extended period of time, wherein a need
exists to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of the vacant position. An extended period of
time is generally considered as an assumption of duties and responsibilities that Will last in
excess often (10) workdays.
4 Working out of classification compensation shall be allowed only after written
recommendation of the department head and concurrence by the eity eoordlnator
Recommendation and deSignation shall be accomplished prior to the assumption of higher
classification responsibilities.
22
~
5 The employee's compensation will be increased by 5% to the next highest step of the high.
classification in which the employee is substituting
6. When the temporary assignment IS completed, the employee's salary will be readjusted to
Its prevIous level on the level where it would have attained, Including general salary
adJustment and within range increases, If the out-of-classification pay had not been made
The employee's date of hire and anniversary date will remain unchanged throughout the
temporary assignment.
.
23
.
~...- ------- ----- --..~~ - ------
- -
~----------------- ~ - ---------------------- -
v
. MEMORANDUM
.
.
TO: Mayor and council
FR: City Coordinator
RE: Amended Joint Cable Agreement
DA: April 2, 1999
Discussion:
Accompanying this memo is the ''final" amended Joint Cable Communications
agreement. I believe the agreement is consistent with previous Council
discussion/approval, including the language contained in Article IX, Section IS.e.
regarding lobbying activities. Therefore, I would recommend Council approve the
amended agreement.
Recommendation:
Council adopt resolution approving amended Joint Cable Communications agreement.
~
-- ---. -- ..---- ---...------. -...---....-----...- ------- --- - -------- ...---- - - - ~_......- ----- - --- ------- ---- -
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
APPROVING AMENDED JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
ST. CROIX VALLEY JOINT CABLE COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
BE IT RESOL VED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, that the amended Central St.
Croix Valley Joint Cable Communication Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement, by and
between the Cities of Stillwater, Bayport, and Oak Park Heights, is hereby approved.
Adopted by Council this (ih day of April, 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
.
.
- - -. ..... - -. .... - -----.. ..... --.. ----- - ~ - - --..... ....,..-..._-
----.--.....--- -----------~--
LA W OFFICES OF
James f Lammers
Robert G Br,ggs_
.\\ark J V,erl,ng*
Gregory G Galler+
Thoma& J We,dne,"*
Susan DOlson.
David K Sn~.der
Urosh P,lehch*
Lammers. Briggs. W oUf &'~,~~~~~
1835 Northwestern Avenue I - t
. t' I ",lIn
StIllwater MInnesota 55082 . I IIYII-\l'\ 2 9 f999 'Lyle J Eclcberg
.....-------------..-------
Paul A Wolff
(194.1-1996)
..Qualified Xeutral Arb.trator & Med.ator
.Qual.f.ed Xeutral Arb.trator
.cerhf.ed Real Estale Spec.al.st
eQual.f.ed ~eutral ~ed.ator
(651) 439-2878
F.U (651) 439-2923
. Eckberg.
D1rect Dial No.:
(651) 351-2118
March 24, 1999
Mr. Thomas Melena
City Administrator
City of Oak Park Heights
14168 - 57th Street No.
P.O. Box 2007
Oak Park Heights, MN 55082
Mr. Nile L. Kriesel
City Coordinator
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Mr. Kenneth H. Hartung
City Administrator
City of Bayport
294 North 3rd Street
Bayport, MN 55003
.
Re: Cable Communications Joint Agreement
Gentlemen:
Following the correspondence that I received from Mr.
Kriesel dated March 18, 1999, a copy of which I forwarded to each
of you, I have amended the Joint Powers Agreement for the Central
St. Croix Valley Joint Cable Communications Commission to
incorporate those comments. Enclosed herewith please find what I
propose to be a final draft on all of those issues, which draft has
the amended language as suggested by Mr. Kriesel in Article ~ .
.IX .1 S'.e
Should any of you have questions with regard to same,
please feel free to contact me or each other. I assume that this
draft now in final form may be presented to d passed by the
respective City Councils. Thank you for y co peration in this
matter.
.
MJV/sdb
Enclosure
.-
.
.
.
CENTRAL ST. CROJ:X VALLEY JOJ:NT CABLE COMMONJ:CATJ:ON COMMJ:SSJ:ON
JOJ:NT AND COOPERATJ:VE AGREEMENT
JOIN'!' AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
.
CENTRAL ST. CROIX VALLEY JOINT CABLE COMM'DNJ:CATION COMMISSION
The parties to this agreement are governmental units of the
State of Minnesota. This agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 238.01 et seg. 471.59.
I . PURPOSE
The general purpose of this agreement is to establish an
organization to administer and enforce a single non-exclusive cable
communications franchise, and establish rates thereunder, in
regular member municipalities in the Central St. Croix Valley of
Washington County, Minnesota. In order to carry out the purpose of
-
this agreement, the parties shall appoint a commission which shall
be representative of all regular member municipalities. It is not
the purpose of this _agreement to restrict or otherwise .preempt that
authority which the regular member municipalities hereof possess
.
individually to grant and issue non-exclusive franchises.
I I. NAME
The organization created by this agreement shall be known as
the "Central St. Croix Valley Joint Cable Communications
Commission" .
III.
DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this agreement, the terms defined in this
article shall have the meanings given to them.
SECTION 1.
"Associate Members" means a governmental unit
in the State of Minnesota which has entered into this agreement and
is, at the time involved, a party in good standing.
1
.
.
.
.
Associate Members shall have only all those powers and
responsibilities as are set forth in Roman Numeral V. hereof.
SECTION 2. "Commission" means the organization created
pursuant to this agreement.
SECTION 3. "Primarv Reoresentativen means the persons, one
which must be an elected member of that city council, appointed by
regular member municipalities City Council to be its primary or
principal representative on the Commission.
SECTION 4. nAlternate Reoresentativen means the persons
appointed by a regular member municipality to serve in the place of
a primary or principal representative in the event that that
individual is not able to attend meetings, conferences or other
functions where primary representatives - are expected to - be in
attendance.
SECTION s. nRecrolar Member Municioalitv" means a city
which enters into this agreement and is, at the time involved, a
regular member municipality in good standing.
IV. REGULAR MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES
The cities eligible to enter this agreement are the following
three Minnesota cites: Bayport, Oak Park Heights and Stillwater.
V. ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
SECTION 1. Eliaibilitv. Other governmental units which
desire to follow the activities of the Commission and receive and
contribute information about the development of a cable
communications system, for the purpose of coordination
2
intergovernmental relationships, may affiliate with the Commission
as "associate members".
SECTION 2. Aoolication. A governmental unit desiring to
become an associate member may do so in the manner applicable to
becoming a regular member municipality, except as otherwise
provided in this article. The Commission may reject an application
for associate membership by a governmental unit.
SECTION 3. Associate ReDresentati ves. An associate member
may appoint an associate representative and an alternative
associate representative to the Commission, but these individuals
shall not have voting power, shall not be eligible to serve as an
officer and shall not be counted for quorum purposes.
SECTION 4. Charqes. The Commission may establish the
charges to be paid by associate members and, for that purposes, it
may classify associate members in accordance with their varying
circumstances.
SECTION 5. wi thdrawal . An associate member may
discontinue its association with the Commission at any time by
giving thirty days written notice of its withdrawal to the
Secretary of the Commission. Withdrawal shall not relieve that
associate member from its obligations to pay any charges which it
has incurred up to the time of withdrawal nor shall withdrawal
affect the abil~ty of the Commission to establish rates for
subscribers within the associate members geographic territory.
3
.
.
.
-..
.
.
.
VI. REPRESENTATIVES
SECTION 1.
OUalifications/Aooointment. The City Council
of each regular member municipality shall appoint two primary
representatives, at least one of whom shall be a member of that
council.
The other representative may also be a member of that
council but in any event must be a qualified voter residing within
the city.
When the council of a regular member municipality
appoints its first two primary representatives, it shall give
notice of their appointments to the City Clerk of the other regular
member municipalities.
Notice of
primary
a
successor
representative shall be given to the Secretary of the Commission.
Notices shall include the name and mailing - address of the appointee
- -
which shall be deemed to be the official name and address of that
appointee for the purpose of giving any'notice required under this
-
agreement.
SECTION 2.
Alternate Reoresentative. Each regular member
municipality shall appoint an alternate representative in the same
manner and with the same condition as stated in Section 1.
Alternate representatives shall be considered as primary
-:
representatives in the event a primary representative is unable to
attend a meeting as defined in Section VIII.
SECTION 3.
Attendance.
In the event that a primary
representative fails to attend four (4) meetings within a twelve
(12) month calendar year period then, within sixty (60) days of the
fourth unexcused absence, the Commission shall declare that
representative's seat vacant and the member municipality shall
4
appoint a different successor primary representative to complete
the remaining term.
.
SECTION 4.
Term.
The terms of the first primary
representatives shall begin on the effective date of this agreement
and one representative designated from each city shall serve a two
year term and other a three year term. Thereafter, each primary
representative shall serve for a term of two years. Irrespective
of the terms assigned to each representative or regular member
municipality, that representative shall serve at the will of his or
her municipality and can be removed at any time with or without
cause by that regular member municipality upon that municipality
providing a notice of that event to the City Clerks of the other
-
regular member municipalities and to the secretary of. the
Commission.
SECTION 5.
Votinq. Each primary representative shall have
.
one vote. There shall be no voting by proxy, however, in the event
a primary representative is not in attendance, the alternate
represent~tive shall have his/her one vote.
SECTION 6.
ComDensation.
Representatives shall serve
without compensation from the Commission, but this shall not
prevent a regular member municipality from compensating its
representatives if compensation by that regular member municipality
is otherwise authorized by law.
VII.
OFFICERS
SECTION 1.
Number/Election.
The
officers
of
the
Commission shall consist of a Chairman, a Vice Chairman, a
5
.
.
.
.
Treasurer, and a Secretary, all of whom shall be a primary
representative and shall be elected at the first meeting of the
Commission and at the annual meeting of the Commission held on the
3 rd Monday of Februarv of each year.
New officers shall take
office at the adjournment of the annual meeting of the Commission
at which they are elected.
SECTION 2.
Chairman/Vice Chairman. The Chairman or his
designee shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and shall
perform all duties incident to the office of Chairman, and such
other duties as may be prescribed by the Commission.
The Vice
-
Chairman shall act as Chairman in the absence of the Chairman.
- -
SECTION 3.
Secretarv. The Secretary shall be responsible
for keeping a record of all the proCee~ings of the Commission and
.... ..--
giving notice of the meetings.
SECTION -4 . Treasurer. ~ The Treiisurer shall have- cii.~tody of
the Commission's funds, pay its bills, keep its financial records
and generally conduct its financial affairs. All checks -drawn upon
the Commission's bank account shall be countersigned by two
persons, one of whom shall be an officer of the commission. The
Treasurer shall post a fidelity bond or carry an insurance policy
in an amount approved by the Conunission, covering all persons
authorized to handle Commission funds. The Commission shall pay
the cost of the bond or policy. The Commission's financial books
and records shall be audited on or before July 1st each year, or at
such other time as the Commission may direct by an independent
auditor designated and approved by the Commission.
6
VIII.
MEETINGS
SECTION 1.
Recrolar Meetinas.
Regular meetings of the
.
Commission 'shall be held once each month. A regular meeting or
meetings may be cancelled by the Chairman for good cause shown
provided that notice has been given to all representatives pursuant
to Section 2. hereof.
SECTION 2.
Soecial Meetinas.
Special meetings of the
Commission may be called by the Secretary upon the written request
of a majority of the representatives provided that the majority
must consist of at least one representative of each member City.
SECTION 3.
Notice.
Notice of regular meetings of the
Commission shall be given to the representatives by the Secretary
at least five days in ~dvan~e a~d 'when feasible, the agenda for
.
such meetings shall accompany the notice. However, business at
regular meetings of the Commission need not be limited to matters
.
set forth in the agenda.
SECTION 4.
Location. All public meetings or hearings by
or before the Commission, the Executive Committee, or any
subcommittee shall be held within one of the regular member
municipalities.
SECTION 5.
Publication of Notices.
All public notices
required to be published by this agreement, the franchise
ord~nance, the Minnesota Cable Communications Act or by the rules
of the MCCB or the FCC shall be published in the official newspaper
of each regular member municipality.
7
.
-.
.
.
.
SECTION 6. Documents. All documents required to be made
available at the Commission for public inspection by this
agreement,
the
franchise ordinance,
the Minnesota
Cable
Communications Act or by the rules of the MCCB or the FCC shall be
deposited and made available at the ~ity Hall or offices of each of
the regular member municipalities to this agreement.
SECTION 7.
By-laws.
At the first meeting, or as soon
thereafter as it reasonable may be done, the Commission shall adopt
by-laws governing its procedures, including the time and place of
its regular meetings. The by-laws may be amended from time to time
by a majority vote of the representatives present and vo~ing.
SECTION 8.
votina/Ouorum. Unless otherwise provided in
-
this agreement, no business shall be done unless voted for by a
-
-
- :: - ....-
majority of the representatives present and voting at a Commission
meeting, except that less than a majority may adjourn. A-'m~jority
of the number of representatives-appointed at anyone time shall
constitute a quorum of the Commission.
IX POWERS. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF COMMISSION
The powers, rights and duties of the Commission shall include
those set forth in this Article.
SECTION 1.
Franchisino Authoritv.
It shall act as the
cable communications franchising authority for the members to this
agreement.
SECTION 2.
Grant of Franchises. It shall prepare, adopt
and grant cable communications franchises pursuant to the Minnesota
8
Cable Communications Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238, the rules
of the MCCB and the FCC, and according to the following procedure:
.
a.
Needs Assessment Reoort.
It shall compile, make
publicly available and approve a Needs Assessment Report.
b. Reauest for Prooosals. It shall prepare and adopt
after a public hearing a Request for Proposals. The adoption of
the Request shall be by a unanimous vote of the representatives of
the Commission present and voting. If a request is not unanimously
adopted on the initial vote of the representatives, additional
votes shall be taken until either (i) a request is adopted by
unanimous vote of the representatives or (ii) the hearing is
-
adj ourned in which case the Commission may schedule and hold
additional public meetings to adopt a request for proposals. -,
c.
-
Desiqnation of Comoanv bv Resolution.
After
.
receipt and review of all proposais-SUbmitted to the Commission by
cable communications companies, it shall select after a public
hearing by resolution one cable communications company to which it
may grant a franchise. The adoption of this resolution shall be by
a unanimous vote of the representatives present and voting. If a
cable communications company is not unanimously selected on the
initial vote of the representatives, additional votes shall be
taken until either (i) one company is selected by unanimous vote of
the representatives or (~i) the hearing is adjourned in which case
the Commission may schedule and hold additional public meetings to
select a company in accordance with this paragraph.
9
.
.
.
.
d. Adootion of Franchise Ordinance. It shall prepare
and adopt an authorization known hereafter as a "franchise
ordinance" and, by that franchise ordinance, grant to one cable
communications company a non - exclusive franchise, not exceeding
fifteen years, to construct, maintain, operate, or manage a cable
communications system encompassing all of the territory of the
regular member municipalities. The introduction of the franchise
ordinance and the grant of the franchise shall be after a public
- -
hearing and no sooner than 27 days after the hearing is closed, by
-
a unanimous vote of
- .
the - representatives present
and voting,
. -
provided however, that the franchising process shall cease if a
- ~ ... - ~...- ~
- .. ~ - .-
cable communications company _ is - not _ granted the franchise _ by
.... "'- .. - .. :.. ~ '.. ~..
ordinance-approv~d-unanimously by;~e~resent~tives in accordance
- - - ..
.-:: -~
-
If the franchise ordinance is not adopted and
granted ~~~moi"siy "on' the initial ';ote of th~
with this paragraph.
- __.1 .: - ..... ..
the franchise is not
. -
representatives, additional votes shall be taken until either (i)
-
the franchise-ordinance is adopted and the franchise granted by
unanimous yo~e of the representat.ives or (ii) the hearing is
adjourned in which case the Commission may schedule and hold
additional public meetings to adopt the franchise ordinance and
grant the franchise in accordance with this paragraph.
In the
event the franchising process ceases in accordance with this
paragraph, the Commission shall promptly recommence the franchising
process in accordance with this paragraph.
10
e.
Withdrawal.
A member may withdraw from the
.
Commission 18 months after sending a written Notice of Withdrawal
to the Commission's Secretary, as hereafter set forth.
(1) Notice of Withdrawal.
A member withdrawing
from the Commission shall send to the MCCB and the Commissions's
Secretary a written Notice of Withdrawal specifying the effective
date of withdrawal and containing a copy of the City Council's
action approving its withdrawal. A member's withdrawal
shall be effective 18 months after that member sends its Notice of
-
Withdrawal, unless it specifies a later date in its Notice. A
Notice of Withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by a member.
(2) Effectiveness of Ordinance After Withdrawal.
-
The franchise ordinance adopted by the Commission shall provide
that it is effective and enforceable within the territorial limits
of a city which has withdrawn from-the-Commission and a city which
withdraws from the Commission under these Articles shall be bound
.
by the terms of any cable communications franchise ordinance
previously adopted and any franchise previously granted by the
Commission.
A city which has withdrawn shall be the exclusive
authority to administer and enforce the cable franchise ordinance
of that city.
(3) Coooeration. The Commission and a city which
withdraws under this article shall cooperate with each other and
the cable communications operator and shall use their best efforts
to achieve an orderly and efficient transfer to that city any of
11
.
.
.
.
the assets of that city, and the administrative and enforcement
authori ty over the cable communications system established with it.
SECTION 3.
Public Hearinas/Notice. It shall hold at least
one public hearing before it adopts a request for proposals under
Section 2 (b), designates a company by resolution in accordance
with Section 2 (c), adopts a franchise ordinance in accordance with
Section 2 (d), amends that ordinance in accordance with Section 2
(g), or establishes subscriber rates in accordance with Section 5.
At least ten days before each such public hearing, it shall publish
. .
in newspapers 'spedified-in Article VIII, Section 5, a notice of
- -
that hearing. It. - shall comply. with all notice and hearing
~... l ... _.. _
requirements ~et forth~in 4 MCAR, -Secti~n 4.140.
"" $ ~-... ~..; .. - -... ~ -
SECTION 4. _: _ -. Admiiiistration/Enforcement.
It
shall
..... ..., ....
t'" ,.
administer and enforce the - cable 'communications franchise ordinance
.. - .. ..
- . -
"'~.. ..~.. ~ - "!..~ - '" ......... to.. _ .,.... -
provided that- the franchise ordinance may permit the enforcement
and administration of certain of its' provisions by regular member
.
municipalities to this agreement, for which services the Commission
shall payor reimburse its regular member municipalities.
SECTION 5.
Rates. To the extent permitted by federal and
state law, by two-thirds vote 'of the representatives present and
voting, it shall establish or approve changes in rates charged
subscribers by the cable communications company. It shall inform
the City Council of each member of proposed changes in rates
charged subscribers under Section 13 below.
SECTION 6.
Investiaation.
It may investigate the
operation of cable communications systems in other cities in
12
Minnesota or elsewhere, and the expense of traveling and
subsistence of representatives in making any such investigations
.
shall be borne by the Commission.
SECTION 7.
Gifts/Grants. It may accept gifts, apply for
and use grants and may enter into agreements required in connection
herewith and it may hold, use and dispose of money or property
received as a gift or grant in accordance with the terms hereof.
SECTION 8.
Contracts.
It may enter into any contracts
deemed necessary by the Commission to carry out its powers and
duties, subject to the provisions of this agreement.
-
Contracts
shall be let and purchases shall be made in accordance with the
legal requirements applicable to contracts and purchases by
Minnesota statutory cities.
SECTION 9.
Advisorv Bodies.
It may appoint advisory
.
bodies to make recommendations to it on cable communications.
SECTION 10.
-
Consultants. It may act or cause others to act
in any manner regarding (i) the study of cable communications, (ii)
the preparation of a franchise ordinance and other documents
required to grant such a franchise, (iii) the evaluation of
applications, (iv) the administration and enforcement of a cable
communications franchise, and (v) the establishment of rates
thereunder.
SECTION 11.
Ex-Officio Members. It may appoint ex-officio
members to serve at the pleasure of the Commission, said ex-offJ.cio
member shall serve without compensation and without the right to
vote.
13
.
.
.
.
SECTION 12.
Amendments and Aqreement. It shall recommend
for enactment by its regular member municipalities, amendments to
this agreement which will facilitate the administration and
enforcement of the franchise ordinance adopted and the franchise
granted by it, and the establishment of rates thereunder.
SECTION 13.
Reoorts to Members.
It shall report all
proposed amendments of the franchise ordinance and changes in
subscriber's rates to the City Council of each regular member
municipality at least twenty nine days before the public hearing on
those matters.
SECTION 14.
Other Actions. It shall take such action as it
deems necessary and appropriate to accomplish the general purposes
of the Commission and it may exercise any othe~ power neces~a;~ and
,
incidental to the implementation of its powers and duties.
SECTION 15.
Additional Powers. -
a. To employ administrative or other personn~l~ legal
- -
counsel, engineers, consultants, or other qualified persons who may
be paid for other services by hourly wages or by such fees as may
be agreed upon.
b.
plans,
studies,
and
To
cause
reports,
recommendations to be prepared.
c. To lease or purchase equipment and supplies
necessary to carry out the purposes of this agreement.
d.
To institute,
carry forward,
and diligently
prosecute administrative procedures and lawsuits deemed advisable
to accomplish the purposes of this agreement.
14
e. The commission, its agents and employees may engage
in lobbying activities related to the regulation of cable
communications only after such activities, including rela~ed
travel, are approved by a two thirds (2/3' s) vote of cable
commission members. The commission may also submit written comments
on rules, regulations or legislation regarding cable communications
proposed by or pending before the MCCB, the FCC, the Minnesota
Legislature or Congress.
SECTION 16. Notice. Meetings shall be noticed and
conducted in accordance with the Minnesota "Open Meeting Lawn
Minn. Stat. S4 71.705 and amendments thereto. The collection,
creation, storage, maintenance, dissemination and access to data
shall be in accordance with the Government Data Practices Act,
Minn. Stat. S13. 01 et. sea. Commission members and Commission
employees and appointees shall be subject to the regulations and
statutory provisions governing "local officials n as provided by
Minn. Stat. S10A.Ol et. sea.
SECTION 17. Other Laws and Reaulations. This agreement,
all Commission activities, and any franchise ordinance adopted or
franchise granted by the Commission shall be subject to all local,
state and federal laws, and regulations.
X. FINANCIAL MATTERS
SECTION 1. Contributions: Pre-Award. Pre-award expenses
of the Commission shall be paid from contr1butions from each city.
Contributions shall be made on an equal or pro-rate basis depending
upon the nature or purpose of the expense which shall be agreed
IS
.
.
.
.
.
.
upon by the regular member municipalities before the expense is
incurred. Any contribution made or expense incurred, such as
franchise referendum costs, by a regular member municipality per
this section shall be reimbursed to the regular member municipality
from any fees or non-refundable deposits received from prospective
and/or successful cable communication operators.
SECTION 2. Contributions: Post Award. Post award
contribution shall be assessed on equal or pro-rate basis depending
on the nature or purpose of the expense, or in such other way as
the regular member municipalities shall agree.
SECTION 3. Budqet Process. A proposed budget for all
succeeding years shall be formulated by the Commission and
submitted to each of its regular member municipalities on or before
August 1st of each year. The commission shall adopt its preliminary
budget on or before September 15th of each year and adopt its final
budget on or before December 15th of each year A budget shall be
effective only if approved by a two-thirds majority of the regular
member municipalities, the Commission shall formulate a revised
budget and submit it to regular member municipalities for their
review and approval. If the budget is not approved by the regular
member municipalities the commission shall promptly formulate a
revised budget and resubmit it to the regular member municipalities
for their review and approval.
SECTION 4. Exoenditures. Provisions of Minnesota Statutes
which govern the expenditures of funds by statutory cities shall
16
apply to the Commission. The Commission shall not have power to
levy taxes.
SECTION S. Annual Audit. The annual audit of the
Commission's books and records required by Article VII, Section 4,
shall be reported to the regular member municipalities. The
Commission's books and records shall be available for and open to
examination by the regular member municipalities and the general
public at reasonable times.
SECTION 6. Franchise Fees. The franchise ordinance
adopted by the Commission shall provide that the Commission shall
collect all franchise fees paid by the cable communications company
to which a franchise has been granted. The franchise ordinance
shall also provide for the ability of the commission to require an
audi t of the franchise fees at the franchisee expense for any
period of time during the franchise.
XI. DISSOLUTION
SECTION 1. Method. The Commission shall be dissolved upon
the affirmative vote of all the regular member municipalities of
the Commission.
SECTION 2. Distribution of Assets. Upon dissolution, the
remaining assets of the Commission, after payment of all
obligations, shall be distributed among the regular member
municipal1ties in proportion to their contr1butions, or in such
other way as those regular member municipalities may agree.
SECTION 3. Necessarv Measures. In the event of a
dissolution the Commission shall determine the measures necessary
17
.
.
.
.
.
.
to effect the dissolution and shall provide for the taking of such
measures as promptly as circumstances permit and subject to the
terms of this agreement.
SECTION 4. Effectiveness of Ordinance After Dissolution.
The franchise ordinance adopted by the Commission shall provide
that it is effective and enforceable within the territorial limits
of all cities which were regular member municipalities prior to the
dissolution of the Commission, and those cities shall be bound by
the terms of any cable communications franchise ordinance
previously adopted and any franchise previously granted by the
Commission.
XI I. EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 1. Execution of Aqreement. A regular member
municipality entering into this agreement shall do so by the duly
authorized execution of a copy of this agreement by its proper
officers. Thereafter, the Clerk or other appropriate officer of
that regular member municipality shall file a duly executed copy of
this agreement, together with a certified copy of the authorizing
resolution required by Article X with the City Clerk of the City of
Stillwater.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This agreement shall become
effective when (a) it has been authorized by all of the three
eligible cities and (b) all appropriate documents have been filed
as provided above.
SECTION 3. Previous Aqreement SUDerseded. This agreement,
when effective under Section 2 above, superseded all previous
18
agreements between the regular member municipalities hereto
establishing a joint cable communications commission.
SECTION 4. This agreement shall be effective as of
, 1998. Independent approvals of each of the
member communities shall be effective "nunc pro tunc" to the
effective date as provided herein and shall have the same effect as
if done at that time.
XIII. DURATION AND ENFORCEMENT
This agreement shall continue in full force and effect during
the term of any franchise ordinance and shall be automatically
renewed for an additional fifteen year term at the conclusion
thereo unless two of the three members hereof provide notice in
writing to the Commission of their desire not to have the agreement
renew at least one hundred eighty days prior to the expiration of
the franchise ordinance to be issued herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned municipality has
caused this agreement to be signed on its behalf this
day of , 19_
IN PRESENCE OF: CITY OF STILLWATER:
.
.
IN PRESENCE OF:
CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS:
.
19
..
.
.
.
IN PRESENCE OF:
CITY OF BAYPORT:
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Stillwater
this day of I 19___
20
,
. MEMO
.
.
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
v
Mayor and CIty Council]
Steve Russell, Commumty Development DIrector
A Minor SubdlvislOn m DIVIdIng a 15,000 Square Foot Lot into Two Lots of 7,500
March 31, 1999
Tins applIcatIon was reVIewed by the Planning ComnussIon on March 8, 1999 and unanimously
approved The lot SIze and dimensions meet the reqUIrements for smgle family lots In the
Duplex ReSIdentIal DIStrict (RB).
RecommendatIon' Approval
Attachment. ApplIcatIon and staff report
CPC MInutes of 3-8-99
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
CASE NO. SUB/99-6
'-
Planning Commission Date: March 8, 1999
Project Location: 711 South Greeley Street
Comprehensive Plan District: Two Fannly Residential
Zoning District: RB
Type of Application: SubchVlslon
Project Description: A mInor subchVlslon request of Lots 9 & 10, Block 17, Holcombe's 2 nd
AddItIon.
Discussion: The request IS to re-subdIVIde one 15,000 square foot lot Into two single famIly lots 50' x ISO'
or 7,500 square feet each The zoning ordInance for the Two Fannly ResIdentIal DIstnct penmts a ll1lIllmum
of7,500 square foot lot SIze
Conditions of Approval:
1 Approval of CIty EngIneer
2 Legal survey to be recorded
Recommendation: Approval as condItioned
Findings: The subdIVISIon meets the development regulatIons of the zoning and subdIvIsIon ordinances
Attachments: ApplIcatIon form, prelIminary survey
CPC Action on 3-8-99: +6-0 approval
\
.
.
.
.
Case No:
Date Filed.
Fee Paid:
Receipt No. :
PLANNING ADMINISTRAtiON FORM
ACTION REQUESTED:
FEE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF STILLWATER
216 NORTH FOURTH STREET
STILLWATER, MN 55082
_ Certificate of eompliance $70
_ eonditlonal or Special Use Permit $50/200
_ Design Review $25
_ Planned Unit Development* $500
_ Variance $70/200
_ eomprehensive Plan Amendment* $500
~Oning Amendment* $300
Subdivision* $100+$501l0t
Resubdlvlsion $100
Total Fee =iJ /5C!'J rJC'j
*An escrow fee is also required to cover the costs of attorney and engineering fees (see attached)
The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting
material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i.e., photos,
sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater
.
Address of Project -2tJ
Zoning District
p
u I
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
S'OLL~ (;~€G~-Y Assessor's Parcel No. 3~ 030 20 'Zz oot,
Description of Project LttJ! ~pLI" ~T q - J 0
omb~ d
"I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in
all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. I further certify I will comply
with the permit if it is granted and used. n
Property Owner VII r N~.S~ pp..uL.~D&rMe~epresentatJveJ?"'NEi~ .t:~ ~eR..VAl5
Mailing Address ~52t;. &.1th Au.!.. . Mailing Address-;:r{t !, tff.!J. #dU'
City-State-zlptJ~ sJ PAuc....1 S5'/Dq Clty-State-Zip ~f.. PA-UU) 5SIoQ
Telephone No. b 5 - '1 0 - '12.2 Telephone No 5') - 6, I;). L{ IlJ ~
SITE AND PROJECT DESCRI
E-PGH-
Lot Size (dimensions) 5C x /60
.and Area
Height of Buildings' Stories Feet
Principal
Accessory
Total building floor Area sq. ft
Existing sq ft.
Proposed sq. ft.
Paved Impervious Area sq. ft
Number of off street parking spaces provided
RevlSed September 16,1998
IO/,=yl"\~/"1f7 ~
... 1_'/~v'~~' aje,v. ,
.. ':;, PRELIMINARY CO~
SUBJECT T REVISION
, I
.------.. - -
-------..
k ~~
V)
8 \.
~ ; (}Iv:.
~
-<J " \
" .' 1 (,J_ /S-d
'0/)
~ 1\1
t ~1l ~I&
~ ~~ 11.1;0 - ,,-
. , f
~ / /~..$C
r:..-
~i 11.1- I 7J1~
""..sO
. r -r...
. ,
. . I"
I. ~,_i .<
.\.J . .
~ ~ ' It>
~
f I @
-/SO -
S'
I' = j{l' i4 ";
",1 (;
~ ,
I,.
It., I
,
U/', \ .. oJ I , '\.II"
REG LAND SURVEYOR
9090 FAIRY FALLS RD. NO.
STILLWATER, MN 55082
".....1- 5" 630
I"nORDINATCc; IN Fccr
!,rY,1 F 1''' ':''''-0
1. 1(."
I I' 1(' I r lit! II
1\1 I IJ T11 r .: (orl
h filii I I
J)(Il11N :...
7
,
:>
, I
-
-.. ..------ -- ....- ,
.,
.3
;J"/:;"
~.
"
'I P I
31 So f
'lie
~
.
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SUBDMSION
NotIce IS hereby given that the City CouncIl of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, wIll meet on
Tuesday, Apnl6, 1999, at 7 p.m In the Council Chambers at Stillwater CIty Hall, 216 North
Fourth Street, to consider a request from Kenneth Gervais, K & T No St Paul Investments, LLC,
for a nunor subdiViSIon of Lots 9 & 10, Blk 17, Holcombe's 2nd AdditIon, subdiViding one
15,000 square foot lot Into two single fanuly lots (50' x 150' or 7,500 square feet) at 711 South
Greeley Street In the RB, Two Fanuly ResidentIal DIStnct Case No. SOO/99-6
~
\
.
All persons wishing to be heard with reference to tlus request wIll be heard at tlus meeting. .
Steve Russell
Commumty Development Director
Publish: March 26, 1999
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
.
,
I
.
.
.
.
Planning COnllnISSlOn
March 8, 1999
Present:
Jerry Fontame, chaIrperson
Russ Hultman, Holly Owen, John Rhemberger, Tom Weidner and Terry Zoller
Others.
Commumty Development DIrector Steve Russell
Absent.
Glenna Bealka, Don ValsVlk and Darwm Wald
Mr. FontaIne called the meetIng to order at 7 p m
Approval of nunutes. Mr. Rhemberger, seconded by Ms Owen, moved approval of the nunutes
of Feb. 8, 1999; all in favor
Case No. SUB/99-6 A mmor subdIVISion of Lots 9 and 10, Block 17, Holcombe's 2nd AddItion,
subdlvl(img one 15,000 square foot lot mto two smgle-famIly lots (50' x 150') at 711 S Greeley
St. m the RB, Two-Fanuly ReSidential Distnct. Kenneth GervaIS, K & T No St Paul
Investments, LLC, applIcant
Mr GervaIs was present He stated he wIll be able to meet all setbacks, and no vanance IS
needed.
Mark GIeseke, 701 S. Greeley, expressed Ius concern that a new home wIll change the character
of the neighborhood He also stated the house wIll look "squeezed m" on the lot
Mr Hultman asked about access. Mr. GervaIs saId he IS dealmg With a nelghbonng property
owner m an effort to obtam an easement, but WIll have a dnveway If necessary.
Mr Zoller noted that as long as the request meets the ordInance requrrements and no vanance IS
needed, the Commission has no alternative but to approve the request. Mr Rhemberger,
seconded by Mr Zoller, moved approval as conditioned; all m favor
Case No. V/99-7 A vanance to the Sign ordInance for an mternally Illuminated monument Sign,
5' x 6', at 6750 StIllwater Blvd, m the CA, General CommerCial Distnct. Jnn Palmer, ReMax,
applIcant
Mr Palmer was present. He saId the requested vanance IS consistent WIth other SignS, such as the
adjacent Amoco and KmderCare SignS, along HIghway 5
Mr Rhemberger, seconded by Mr Zoller, moved approval as conditioned. Motion passed 5-1,
WIth Mr Weidner votmg no.
Case No. SV/99-10 A street vacation request for the east 30' x 150' of North Frrst Street from
WIllow to Poplar Street. John M. Schoenecker, applIcant.
~
. MEMO
.
.
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Mayor and CIty CouncIl V
Steve Russell, Commumty Development DIrector
Street Vacation ofa PortIon of North FIrst Street South of WIllow Street adjacent 30
feet East Willow Street (Case No. SV/99-10)
March ~1, 1999
The request IS to vacate a portion of North FIrSt Street (see enclosed map). The request would
make It dIfficult to access eXIstmg lots south of the vacation along North FIrst Street The CIty
Engmeer opposes the vacation because the nght of way may be needed for publIc works. Several
neIghbors spoke m opposItion to the request at the Plannmg ComrmssIon of March 8, 1999 (see
attached mmutes)
The Plannmg Comrmssion recommends demal of the request
CouncIl Action: DecIsIon on recommendatIon
Attachments ApplIcation, staff report and Mmutes of 3-8-99
...
iIlwater
~ ~
\~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
..
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Planmng ComnnssIon
Steve Russell, Commumty Development DIrector
Street VacatIon Request for the east 30' x 150' of North FIrst Street from WIllow
Street to Poplar Street Case No. SV/99-10
March 10, 1999
Date:
The applIcatIOn IS for a street vacation at the above locatIon Attach is a memo regardIng tlns
request from the CIty'S Public Works Department
Recommendation: Denial
Attachment: Memo from CIty Engmeer, PetitIon to Vacate and map
CPC Action on March 8, 1999: Denial 6-0
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
..
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
Memormulum
March 4, 1999
TO: Sue FItzgerald, Planner
FROM: Klayton H Eckles fL,~
CIty EngIneer
SUBJECT: Comments on Proposed Street Vacation
Of 1 st Street, Between Willow and Poplar
DISCUSSION:
It is my understandmg that there IS a request to vacate a portIon 1 st Street, between WIllow
and Poplar on the North HIll. The request would mc1ude the vacation of a section of 1 st Street of
150' X 30'. It IS the CIty'S polIcy to retaJ.n nght-of-way wherever there IS a potential for future streets
and/or utilities.
Currently there IS a moratonum on the North HIll that restrIcts the construction of new
homes Tins moratonum IS reqUIred because there IS no CIty sewer, water, or storm sewer m tlus
area At tlus tl1lle, we do not know where or how these publIc utilIties wIll be proVIded It IS
possible that areas that currently are ummproved wIll be l1llproved by the addItion of these publIc
utilIties. For tlus reason, I would recommend at tlus t.une that the CIty retam all easements and nght-
of-ways on the North Hill untIl the publIc utilIties are proVIded to the area
"
illwater
~ ~
---- '1'\
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA J
~~ A- J~/.e.
S~h~(,'1 pct,~
CITY OF STILLWATER
PETITION TO VACA TE PUBLIC STREET
The undersigned hereby petition that all that portIOn of &.Jf 3D ~ {50/0f' /j,J,;5 .5f.
j3. bF P <;-l~fef ("',,'" w;//o,J sf. -10 pfJp/u- 51-red
abuttmg Lots . Block Lj J..
Addition, In the City of Stillwater, hereby be vacated
Name
Address
307 E: t,) IL""V~
IP~l/ ~ /#
,
.
KA-Npl./ I4Ikt-1 ~
r
_&~.,~~J~~)
sT
"
*Attach a map showing the street to be vacated
Fee $100 htJ..!l!<t
Receipt No. 01
.
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
,~
;'c70
~7~o
/..9/~
9c70
~ 780 /.9/2
..927t:1
~et:Jo 1.908
3
9270
"'820 ~
~2""
o
WILLOW
14'0
9270
&"24-0
1824-
~
--.,?zzo - - ~-18-/8-
~Z"o ~ "
II)
3.9Z70 ~
~280
('
i
-:- - ---- ---- -- -- - - -
..,..
~3vo
3
.
-t.,G
\
~
~
~
V)
~
~
3/:/
4 t.34o \
#
.9Z 70 ~ .980 9Z
.70~ 0 49. :a
t
7020
- -- -- -- - - - -- t/--
~9.9o
$c.
301
cc
w
I
4
/
/5'0
9270
~.983
3
/
, .' I..>>"
/5'0
STREET
so ,..;, _ _ _ .ISO
.3a 7 .30:;; ~ -- /"., 1/- 9c 70
~070
/
6
9270 .9Z 70
~COO t,22c
I
t --
t.-/ ~o
-
~o~v
I
t.,t) 7 S-
I
/8
~
\.U
.::t"
Vl
~
..92 7 ()
~/4-0
1-
.3qp
2.
/6
W/i'c.RIGHr OF WAY_ ~N,
~08o
{
\..Ll
)L (.,/00
<.I)
LU
I--
a t
,Q27t)
t/Ca
/8t.
;"
\, l/ /-f '-y T {' li
:5TREET
!:! 5
~ ~l/l13 ~
~~~ \lldIDI
Iii 3:
w 1:1
a::
l- I lllllIDl <C
Ul 0
0 R
R 4 3 w 3 0::
!! R ~ !! m !!
!! g Z
150 150 ::> 0 T32N
EAST HAZEL DIN
0
..
'I:llN
150 PlO5l
_I 'J2!IiI
R R
!! 6 !! 6 T28N
8 TZ7N
8 (0
ll*l
R22W RZIW RZlJW'
;II I:!
!! 5
I'l (011<)
_'I
:c 4
toall .... R 3
(Ila2) !! 0:: !! (OlII2) (llla1) \lialll1y Map
150 0
150 Z 150 150
WILLOW
150 150
'*' (OlII2) .+.
Ii;
l*l _3)
i -')
S ....
\:; ... ....1 UJ
5 ~ ~ 10 ~
2 1Il c
_71 toall !! j!!- ~
is -
~ S <C
!il 0
m (IlIt7) 0::
~ m
Ii; 3 Ii; Ii; 4 Ii; Z 0 143
!! (0115) !! !! lI*l
Scale In Feet
150 60 150 150
~
E POPLAR STREET
~
150
S
100 6 6
(0113)
~
III 150 ~ 13
2 2
0 (OIlZ11 :i !!
pili) R ...
Ill. I! 30 :.:
E Ii; III
REGIS 51
A S! S! =~"on.~'::'-:=-
a ~ 13 3 ~~:.:=-..;=-...~
!!
llllI!2l R F R ::....:t:===c:-....
.. lllllIDl I!
locatIon Mlp =,,"1ii':t:;,<;-s...,........
1000 1000
150 Pa___..........J....,31 1_
~
#
.
.
.
illwater
'~ ~
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STREET VACATION
Notice IS hereby gIven that the Cl'ty Councll of the City ofStlllwater, MInnesota, WIll meet on
Tuesday, Apnl6, 1999, at 7 p.m. in the Councll Chambers at Stillwater CIty Hall, 216 North
Fourth Street, to consIder a request from John M Schoenecker for a street vacation for the east
30' x 150' of North First Street from WIllow to Poplar Street. Case No. SV/99-10.
All persons WIShing to be heard WIth reference to tins request WIll be heard at tins meetIng
Steve Russell
Commumty Development Director
Pubhsh: March 26, 1999
CITY HALL 216 NORTH FOURTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 612-439-6121
.fF~'t~~~~ ~
;80 I:~~$ 1:~/9!~
A-~?tr
jde, ~~.z- ~ -d~
~of/Ai'f~~~~~
1771- ~ ~ ~ Q?-l ~~.-/~ 7
~/l-~tYx..~d~~
fi W fi ;r ~ ~.A--i /4~~1- _vhoz
~4- -:/ 7/'
.dA~:--}?
?M1F~r-
~~~
Ju; 5V'71-/tJ
.
~,~\'\ \
.^ ~~
. '\ "" ~".: -.
.
~
.
.
.
Planning Commission
March 8,1999
Present.
Jerry Fontaine, chauperson
Russ Hultman, Holly Owen, John Rheinberger, Tom Weidner and Terry Zoller
Others:
Community Development DIrector Steve Russell
Absent:
Glenna Bealka, Don Valsvik and Darwin Wald
Mr. Fontame called the meetmg to order at 7 p.m.
ADDroval of mmutes Mr. Rhemberger, seconded by Ms Owen, moved approval of the mmutes
of Feb. 8, 1999, all in favor
Case No. SUB/99-6 A mmor subdIviSIon of Lots 9 and 10, Block 17, Holcombe's 2nd AddItion,
subdiVIding one 15,000 square foot lot into two single-family lots (50' x 150') at 711 S. Greeley
St in the RB, Two-Family ResidentIal Distnct Kenneth Gervais, K & T No. St. Paul
Investments, LLC, applicant.
Mr. GervaIS was present. He stated he WIll be able to meet all setbacks, and no variance IS
needed.
Mark Gteseke, 701 S. Greeley, expressed hIs concern that a new home will change the character
of the neighborhood. He also stated the house will look "squeezed in" on the lot.
Mr. Hultman asked about access. Mr. Gervais said he is dealmg with a neighboring property
owner m an effort to obtaIn an easement, but WIll have a driveway if necessary
Mr. Zoller noted that as long as the request meets the ordinance requirements and no vanance is
needed, the Commission has no alternative but to approve the request. Mr. Rheinberger,
seconded by Mr. Zoller, moved approval as condItIoned; all m favor.
Case No. V /99-7 A variance to the sign ordmance for an internally illuminated monument sign,
5' x 6', at 6750 Stillwater Blvd., in the CA, General Commercial District. Jnn Palmer, ReMax,
applicant.
Mr Palmer was present. He SaId the requested vanance is consistent with other signs, such as the
adjacent Amoco and KmderCare signs, along HIghway 5.
Mr. Rheinberger, seconded by Mr. Zoller, moved approval as conditioned Motion passed 5-1,
WIth Mr. Weidner votmg no.
Case No. SV/99-10 A street vacation request for the east 30' x 150' of North First Street from
Willow to Poplar Street. John M. Schoenecker, applicant.
"
Planning Commission
March 8, 1999
.
Mr. Schoenecker was presented He stated the request is to enable the construction of a garage.
He said he has done extensive remodelmg to his house, contributIng to the revitalIzing the
neIghborhood, and he would like to be able to complete the upgradmg of the house with the
construction of a garage, he showed photos of the work that has been done.
Mr Fontaine referred to the staff comments regardmg the construction moratorium on the North
Hill Mr. Schoenecker said it could be many years before the City does anything m the area, and
he would hke to have a garage before then Mr Russell stated the concern IS that the city not be
m the pOSItion of having to purchase easements at some pomt m the future
Mr. Fontaine asked Mr. Schoenecker If there were any other OptIOns for building a garage Mr.
Schoenecker s31d he owns the lot in back of his house, but putting a garage m that location IS
complIcated by a ravine, and It would be much more costly to c01]struct.
Speaking m opposition were VIrgIl Plattner, 1813 N. Second St and Joe Radunz, 1818 N. FIrst
St. Mr. Radunz also prOVIded a letter from Harold FIscher, 308 E. Poplar, stating hIs opposItion
Mr Rheinberger, seconded by Mr Weidner, moved to deny the request; all in favor. Mr. Zoller
suggested the possIbIlIty of the applicant workIng WIth the CIty engineer m an effort to find some
solution.
Case No. SOO/99-11 A minor subdiVIsIon for subdIviding a 9 10 acre lot mto two lots of about
7.6 and 1 5 acres at 13147 McKusick Road m the RA, Single Fannly Residential Distnct.
Beltram VanTassel, applicant.
.
Mr. VanTassel was present. There was some question as to the location of a road and lot Imes.
Mr. Russell noted that proVIdmg a certIfied survey IS a condition of approval. Mr. Rheinberger,
seconded by Mr. Hultman, moved approval as condItioned; motion passed unammously.
Case No V/SUP/99-12 A vanance and special use permit for a 2,015 square foot restaurant WIth
12 shared parking spaces (21 requIred) at 324 S. Main St. m the CBD, Central Business DIStriCt.
C.M. Architecture, representing Star bucks Coffee Company
The applIcant was not present A correction to the square footage as indicated on the meeting
agenda was noted. It also was noted that the only variance requested is for parking. Mr. Zoller,
seconded by Mr. Rheinberger, moved approval as conditIoned, all in favor.
Case No. CP N99-1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Case No. ZAM/99-1 Zoninsz Map Amendment
Case No. PUD/99-8 Planned Unit Development
Case No. SUB/99-9 Subdivision
.
'.
EDWARD W. SIMONET, JR.
ATIORNEY AT LAW
PO BOX 16
522 SOU1H FOURTII STREET
STn.L WATER. MINNESOTA SSOlI2
PHONE (612) 439-5787
PAX (612) 439-5559
March 30, 1999
City Council
City of Stillwater
City Hall
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Gentlemen:
.
With reference to the request from John M. Schoenecker
concerning a street vacation on North First Street that you
will be considering on Tuesday, April 6, 1999, I wish to
inform you that Vergil R. Plattner and Beverly J. Plattner
do have a record interest therein. The Plattners will not
be able to be present at this hearing and they asked me to
represent them in the form of this letter.
The record interest includes Lot 5, Block 43, Carli &
Schulenberg's Addition to Stillwater which borders on North
Second Street and is not directly affected by the proposed
vacation. They also own Lot 2, except the North 37 feet
thereof, of said Block and Plat, which borders on North First
Street. At present this lot is nonconforming because of no
sewer and water. It would be a buildable lot if sewer and
water was extended on North First Street. For this reason
they would be directly affected if the vacation was granted
and do oppose a granting of this vacation.
QcY~r4:JJ
Edward W. Simonet, Jr.
EWS:vlf
,--.
"
, .
.
· MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Mayor and CIty CouncIl l.. /
Steve Russell, Community Development Director IV"
FIrst Readmg of New Tree OrdInance
March 31, 1999
Background
The CIty CouncIl authonzed the lunng of a Urban Forester to asSISt m the CIty'S efforts to help
protect the natural resources of this CIty. One of the pnmary tasks for the Forester was to work
with the CIty Staff and concerned citIzens m preparation of a tree ordinance
Over the last six months, the Tree Task Force and the Community Development Department has
worked With the Urban Forester on development of a new Tree Protection Ordmance. The Task
Force met several times during the FalVWinter 1998-1999 on the ordinance.
.
A draft ordinance was finally completed In March for presentation to the Planmng CommIssion
(2-8-99 and 3-8-99). The Planmng CommissIon thoroughly dISCUSsed the ordInance and had
general concerns regarchng the amount of CIty mvolvement of tree cuttmg. As a result of
Planmng CommIssion comment, the applicatIon of the ordinance was reduced to sites with
raVines, bluffs or 1 acre or greater. This wIll eliminate most of the development area of the CIty
(see attached CPC mmutes).
Enclosed for Council mformatIon is a checklISt showing how the new ordmance varies from the
eXIsting tree ordinance. The proposed ordinance is much more comprehensive and specIfic.
Also enclosed are some examples of payment to the CIty'S natural resource fund for tree
removal.
The draft ordinance before the Council IS presented for first reading. The Planning CommIssion
recommends adoptIon of the ordInance.
RecommendatIon: ConsideratIon and adoptIng of new Tree ProtectIon Ordmance.
Finding: The ordInance is conSIstent With and carries out the ComprehensIve Plan.
Attachments: Draft Tree Ordmance
CPC Staffreport and mmutes of2-8-99 and 3-8-99
.
"
. '
ORDINANCE NO.
.
TREE PROTECTION ORDINANCE
MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS REGARDING TREE PROTECTION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILL WATER DOES ORDAIN:
SectIon I,
Subd.l ~se. The City of Stillwater fmds that It is m the best interests of the community
to protect, preserve and enhance the natural environment by encouraging a resourceful and prudent
approach to the development and altercatIon of wooded areas. The City also finds it is in the best
interests of the community to protect trees from Improper maIntenance practices It IS the mtent of
this ordInance to protect the community's eXIsting tree resource by preservation and protection of
established trees, by promoting proper tree maintenance practices and by requiring the replacement
of trees which are damaged or removed in the course of development or constructIon actIvitIes The
City recognizes that trees help stabilize soil, reduce stonn water runoff, are valuable components of
watershed areas, aid m the removal of carbon dIoxide and the production of oxygen, provIde a buffer
and screen against both nOIse pollutIon and objectIonable VIews, provIde wIldlife habItat and
corridors; protect and increase property value, conserve and enhance the City's phYSIcal and .
aesthetic environment, and enhance the quality of lIfe of the CIty's residents Therefore, this
ordinance is designed to mimnuze tree damage from development and improper maintenance
practices, and mitigate tree removal resulting from development m areas where there are sigmficant ,
trees or tree cover within the City.
Subd 2. PrincIples for Administration of the Ordmance. In the enforcement of tlns
ordmance, the City may give preference to the preservatIon of those trees considered to be of higher
quality or value because of their size, speCIes, location, or condItion. The City may reqwre the
following measures to be implemented to accomplish or increase preservation of "sigmficant" trees
and natural areas: clustering of buildings or other innovative design techniques, installation of
retaining walls or large tree wells, placement of utilities in common trenches outside the drip line
of trees or natural areas, or the use of tunneled mstallatlon under large trees, and transplantmg of
trees to other areas on the sIte outside the limIts of soIl dIsturbance. To promote the health of trees
within construction areas the City may also require mulching, pruning, watering or soil aeratIon.
The City may request dedIcation of a conservation easement in some circumstances to ensure that
areas of special significance are not damaged or negatively impacted by development.
Subd. 3. AllPlicability. This ordinance applIes to any vacant parcel of land, one acre in size
or larger, undergoing development whIch contains at least five SIgnificant trees. It also applies to
additions to structures or subdivisions of land within bluffs, ravines, wetlands and their designated
setback or buffer areas
.
1
..
,
,
.
.
.
Subd. 4 Defimtions
Development. Any human made change to unproved or ummproved land including, but not
lImited to, construction or reconstruction of buildings or structures (new construction or
additions) rmning, dredging, filling, gradmg, land cleanng, paving excavatIon, drillmg
operations or storage of equipment or materials
Tree Administrator: Community Development Director or his or her designee.
Slinificant Tree A healthy deCIduous tree measuring at least 6 inches dbh, or a healthy
coniferous tree at least 10 feet m height. For slower-growing or smaller statured tree speCIes,
healthy specimens would be considered sIgnificant at 4 mches dbh for ironwood, bur oak or
bicolor (swamp white) oak, and two inches dbh for pagoda dogwood or servIceberry
Deciduous softwood species such as cottonwood and silver maple would be conSIdered
slgmficant at a size of 12 mches dbh when groWIng WIthin a floodplain or other ripanan area,
and significant at a size of20 mches dbh when growing on other sItes. Boxelder, buckthorn,
(Rhamnus cathartlca or R. frangula) and Siberian elm would not be considered significant
trees at any sIze
g];ili' Diameter at breast height-diameter of a tree measured at a point approxImately 54
inches above the ground.
Caliper Inches The dIameter of a tree measured at six mches above the ground (usually used
for trees whose trunks are less than 4 mches m dIameter)
Clearcuttini. Cutting, removal or killing of more than 10% of the significant trees on any
land witlun a period of five years
Subd. 5 License Required for CommercIal Prunini. Chemical Treatment or Removal of
Trees.
a License ApplIcation and Fee. It is unlawful for any person to conduct as a business
the cutting, tnmming, pruning, removal, spraying or otherwIse treating of trees m the City WIthout
first having secured a license from the CIty.
1. Application for the lIcense may be made at the office of the Commumty
Development Director on a form winch has been approved by the City.
2. The annual fee for a license IS set by the City by resolution.
3. All licenses expire on the next 31 st day of December following the date of
Issue.
2
,
..
b Proof ofInsumnce All applicants for the hcense must file WIth the CIty clerk proof .
of a public liabihty insumnce policy covering all operatIons of the applicant hereunder for the sum
of at least three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) combined single hmit coverage. If thIs
insurance IS canceled and the licensee fails to replace it with another policy that conforms to the
provisions of this section, the license is automatically suspended untIl the habihty msurance is
replaced.
c Chemical Treatment ReQJllrements Apphcants who propose to use chemical
substances in any activity related to treatment or chsease control of trees must file WIth the office of
the Community Development DIrector proof that the apphcant admmistenng the treatment has been
certIfied by the State Department of Agnculture as a "CommercIal PestIcide Apphcator" for the
current year of operatIon
d RevocatIon of Ltcense F31lure to comply WIth any part of thIs chapter will result
in the revocation of the hcense by the CIty CouncIl, follOWIng a pubhc heanng Wntten notIce of
the public hearing must be mailed at least ten (10) days pnor to the heanng to the current holder of
the license The notice must outhne the VIolatIon(s) considered by the CIty to be grounds for
revocation and inform the holder of the opportunity to be heard at the pubhc hearing
e Penalty for Doin~ CommercIal Tree Work Without a LIcense. ViolatIon of the
terms and provisions of this ordmance IS a mIsdemeanor pumshable by nmety (90) days in Jail and
up to a $700.00 fine or any combination of the two
.
Subd. 6. V e~etation Cuttin~ Permit Req,wred
a V e~etation cuttin~ alon~ bluffs and m ravmes On lands along and WIthin 40 feet
of blufflmes and on slopes greater than 24%, and m ravme areas, there no cuttmg (prunmg or
removal) of hve trees or shrubs IS permItted WIthout a permIt
A permit may be issued by the tree administrator only if
1. The cutting involves trees less than SIX inches in diameter at breast heIght,
and
2. The essentIal character, qualIty and density of existing growth is preserved
and continuous canopy cover is maintained.
3. A tree protection plan is approved before any significant tree is cut or
pruned.
4. A tree protection plan must be submItted and approved when required by
the tree administrator to protect SIgnIficant trees or natural areas
A permIt is not required for
1. Clearmg of woody trees and shrubs ten (10) feet eIther side of pubhc
.
3
.
.
.
stairways, trails, thoroughfares and streets;
2. removal of diseased, dead or hazardous trees;
3. removal of buckthorn or other invasive non-native woody plant; and
4. clearing necessary for the maintenance of transportation lines or utility
rights-of-way.
Subd.7 Other Development
a. The development of land as defined in Subd. 3 and 4 must obtain a vegetative
cutting permit and comply with the following standards
b Tree Protection Plan
1. A tree protection plan must be approved for any new development project,
and for any structural addItions in bluff or ravine areas where significant trees
are located.
2. The tree protection plan must be submitted with concept PUD or
preliminary subdivision plans, or included with submission of a grading plan.
The tree protection plan must be certified by a forester, landscape architect,
or land surveyor retained by the applicant and approved by the City. All City
costs including City consultant costs associated with the preparation of the
tree protection plan will be borne by the applicant.
3. The tree protection plan must included the follOWing information'
a The name(s), telephone numbers(s) and address(es) of the appbcant
and the property owner;
b location of all eXisting and proposed buildings, structures, or
impervious surfaces situated upon or contemplated to be built upon
the land;
c. delineation of all areas to be graded and the limits of land
disturbance;
d. location and listing by size and species all existing significant
trees, and delineation of the canopy cover of areas of native woody
vegetation greater than 10,000 square feet in sIZe. The data on the
significant trees should be listed in tabular form on the plan or
included as an attachment;
e. measures to be taken to protect sigmficant trees and large areas of
native woody vegetation; and
f. signature of the person(s) preparing the plan, their certification, and
employer or firm, address, phone and fax numbers
g. debneation of those trees and vegetation prepared to be moved,
4
removed or impacted.
Subd. 8. Tree Removal
a Streets, utilities, driveways, parking lots, buildings, and other parts of the
development must be deSigned to maxirmze preservation of significant trees and mmiImze damage
to natural areas
b. No tree removal site alteration or grading is allowed, until the site plan and tree
preservation plan for the project have been approved by the Tree Admmistrator.
c. No clearcutting of trees is permitted on any land except as approved in a
sulxhvision, planned unit development or site development plan application
d. The removal of dead, hazardous and diseased trees is permitted
Subd. 9 Tree Replacement
a All significant trees removed in the course of development, must be replaced on
a one-for-one basiS, and $25.00 per diameter inch of significant trees removed must be pm.d into the
City's Natural Resource Fund.
b. Trees replaced are m addition to any other trees required to be planted pursuant to
any other zoning or subdivision code requirement
c Location of Replacement Trees. Replacement trees must be planted in one or more
of the following areas on the land,
1. Restoration areas includmg steep slopes,
2 outlots or common areas,
3. greenways or areas defining the urban/rural boundary,
4. buffer zones between different land uses and activities;
5 project entrance areas,
6. any other part of the development site except any land dedicated or
conveyed to the City, unless the City consents; and
7. if there is not room on the land for planting all required replacement trees,
alternatively the sum of $100.00 per replacement caliper inch may be pm.d
into the City's Natural Resource Fund
d. Replacement Trees.
1. Tree Replacement Plan Required. Applicant must provide a plan showing
the size, species and location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted
on the property in accordance with the tree replacement requirements.
2 Species. Replacement trees must be species which are included on the
approved tree list of the City and must include species indigenous to the area,
and species Similar to those lost or removed Not more that 20% of the
replacement trees may be of the same species.
3. Size. A mmimum of 2 0 caliper inches for deciduous trees (except bur oak,
bicolor oak, ironwood, and ornamental trees, which may be 1.25 caliper
inches), and a minimum of 6 feet in height for coniferous trees.
5
.
.
.
.
4. Warranty Requirements Any replacement tree which is not alive or
healthy, as determined by the City Forester, WIthIn two years after the date
of the planting of the last replacement tree, must be removed by the Applicant
and replaced with a new, healthy tree meetIng the same species and Size
reqwrements.
5 Planting Standards Planting must adhere to the tree and shrub planting
standards of the City of Stillwater. The tree and shrub planting standards of
the City are those as are adopted by resolution of the City Council from time
to tune
6. Planting Under Power Lines If any replacement trees are to be planted
under power lines, the replacement trees must be trees which attaJ.n a mature
height less than the height of the line, to avoid conflicts with utIlIty service
Subd. 10. Inspection and Enforcement
.
a The following site inspections are required by the Tree Administrator
1 Site inspectIon prior to Issuance of grading permit to confirm that tree
protectIon measures are in place
2 Site inspectIon after completIon of final grading to determine any
additIonal tree damage or removal
3. Building lot development when a site plan review is a conditIon of
approval
Subd 11. Af:reement to Replace Trees-Secunty A Developer, prior to the approval of, or
Issuance of a permit for, any tree removal or land alteration for which trees are reqwred to be
replaced by the proviSIOns of thiS Section, must enter Into a written agreement with the City. This
agreement must be approved by the Tree AdmlIl1strator and the City Attorney. The agreement must
include provisions such as the follOWIng
.
a The Developer must comply with the provisions and conditions imposed by this
Section and any condition of approval unposed on the issuance of any development
of a permit.
b The Developer must indemnify the City against any loss, cost or expense
including an amount for reasonable attorney's fees incurred in enforcing the terms
of the agreement
c The Developer must proVide security for the performance of its obligations. The
secunty may consist of a bond, letter of credit, cash or escrow deposit, all in a form
and substance as are approved by the City Attorney. The amount of secunty must
be 150% of the estImated cost to furnish and plant the replacement trees The cost
will be based upon the reasonable amount charged by nurseries for the furnishing and
planting of trees
d The security must be maintained for two growing seasons after the date the last
replacement tree has been planted (the performance penod) Any portion of the
6
secunty not released at the end of the performance period must secure the .
Developer's oblIgation to remove and replant replacement trees which are not alIve
or are tmhealthy, and to replant miSSing trees Upon completIon of the replanting the
entire security may be released. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no portion of the
security may be released while there are unsatIsfied Developer's oblIgations to
indemmfy the City for any expense incurred in enforcing the terms of the agreement
Subd. 12. Appeal Procedure The appeal procedure IS accordIng to the procedure outlined In
the Zoning Ordinance at Stillwater City Code 31~20.
a An appeal requires a public heanng,
b the appeal, along with the appropnate fee, must be filed with the office of the
Community Development Director Within ten (10) days after the decision has been
made, and
c the appeal will be placed on the agenda of the next regular meetIng of the planmng
commission by the Community Development Director
Subd 13 Effective Date This ordinance will be In force and effect from and after its passage
and publIcatIon according to law Except for the prOViSions of thiS ordinance With regard to bluffs,
ravines, wetlands, and their buffer areas, (whIch provIsion and applIcable to the entIre City) thiS
ordmance Will not apply to any development that has been given prelIminary plat or PUD approval .
pnor to April 20, 1999
Enacted by the City CouncIl of the City of Stillwater thiS _ day of
, 1999
CITY OF STILL WATER
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Modi Weldon, Clerk
.
7
.
City or StlU.ater
3/119'
'GO
PLANT HEALTH ASC
P02
Comparison of Carreat & Proposed Tree Ordinances
.
.
reDt DCt
numm lID general
languageregirdinl
miDimizioa damaae to tree!
during development
r.p ceme.t: max.
treellKfC, and no relation to
Dumber or size of trees
removed
~
../
v
containS lIIIIuaae repnl
adherence to the Tree
PIoteetion Standards
developed in 1998, which
include speeifi~ Iwdelines
for tree tecdon tiees
../
/
r.p ...Dt~ 1 tree P ante
for each tree removed and
$15.00 paid per diameter
inch of sipiticant trees
removed.. relates to number
and size of Res nslnoved
../
.
'Do
PLANT HEALTH ASC
, .
ae: Draft Tree ProteetloD Ordinance
(....... pre,.red by K..Ia.'ae Wldlft, eoaaulCln. Il'o.....r 1m)
Comparison of Tree lu)aeement CaWlJations
M.,~.
All ~ijlllficant trees replaced on a one~for-one basis and $25 00 per diameter inch of
significant bees removed shall be paid into the Oty's Natural Resource Fund.
For all examples - estimated cost of a 2 inch diameter deciduous replacement tree IS $100.
Eumple A: 50~ Tne Removal
200 18 inch diameter trees are On site and 100 will be removed in the course of
development.
Trees Planted for Replacement = 100
Cost = 555,000.
Eumple B: 33% T.... Removal (Reduce Tree Removal by changing plan)
200 18 inch chameter trees are on site and 67 will be removed in the course
of develu}lll'l.~uL.
Trees Planted for Replacement = 61
COlIC = $36,'00
Ea.ple C: "., Tree Removal (ZOOt total diameter inches Oil site)
III 18 inch diameter trees are on site 1114 100 will be removed in the course of
c.h:vclupmcut.
Trees Planted for Replacement = 100
C03t = $SS,OOO
EnlDple D: Shoppinl Center Development on 78 A lite
10 A of medium dense woods tue to be removed ~ tree removal consists of
1343 $ignifir:lUlC trees totalling 17,842 diameter inches. 3.5 A or woods
totalhq6468 diameter incbes are to be retained (rest of site is open).
Trees Planted for Replacement == 1343
Cost = $580,350.
P03'
.
.
.
.
.
.'
'6'0
P04
PLANT HEALTH ASC
T.... Replac...ent Calculation. 1'" . 2
(note: landseapinl plan for this development iDcluded 739 trees, 3, 000 slu\lbs aDd
8,000 3q,. ft. Q{ Sloulldcovora - tbe proposod tancb<i. ptantings as woll as the
SpeCICS and poor condition of tbe trees that wele beiD. mnoved were all taken
into CQ1'sideralioT! tn detcrmirtinl U}efi"'I' ,mountdtrec replacement for this
project)
F:xample E: Moderate Sized aesldeDdal Development 08 2$ A Site
Site has a high density pine plantation as woll as a moderately dense native oak
woodland There are all average of 180 signific;ant trccslac:R with an average
(l1/lmeter of I Z 1PCh08. Total woocJld IQRQ' is l(i~ ^ (j6J43~ total ~i.mewr
inches of slgnlticant trees), and 4.6 A (W'J6 diameter Inches ~ 828 trees) of
woode wiU ~ Rmovw.
Trees Planted for Replacement = 828
Cost = $331,200.
Stillwater Forestry Task Force
Nancy Brown
518 N Owens Street
StIllwater MN 55082
John Baer
812 6th Ave S
Stillwater MN 55082
Leah Peterson
7160 Mid Oaks Lane
Stillwater MN 55082
Laune Maher
3018 Marine Circle
StIllwater MN 55082
Dawn Flinn
160 I South Greeley Street
Stillwater MN 55082
Kathy WlChn
13457 6th St N
Stillwater MN 55082
Angela Anderson
1121 N 4th Street
StIllwater MN 55082
Steve Russell - City representative
NIle Kriesel - City Coordinator
C:\SHEILA\FORESTRY.LST
October 14, 1998
.
430-3307
430-3129 (h)
430-6883 (w)
439-5018
439-3838 (w)
439-7102 (h)
430-2888
.
436-8811
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission
February. 8, 1999
Mr Carlson was present and bnefly explaIned his business proposal, parking would be shared
parking.
Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved approval as condItioned, motion passed
unanimously.
Case No ZAT/99-2 A Zonmg Ordtnance Text amendment modifyIng the accessory
umts/structures in Traditional Residential (TR) DIstrict City of StIllwater, applIcant.
Mr. Russell briefly revIewed the proposed changes which would lumt the sIze of accessory
structures in the TR DIstrIct to 600 square feet and one and one-half stones Mr. Zoller suggested
increasing the number of reqUIred off-street parking spaces due to the narrowness of streets in
the dIstrIct It was agreed to increase the number of requIred off-street parkIng requirements to
five spaces (three covered) and return the amendment for a publIc heanng at the Commission's
March meeting.
Case No ZAT/99-1 A Zoning Ordinance Text amendment establIshing tree protection
regulatIons reqUlnng licenSing of commercial tree trimmers, protecting sigmficant and heritage
trees, establIshing tree replacement or payment for removal of trees. City of Stillwater, applIcant
Present for the heanng were CIty Forester Kathy Wldln and several members of the Forestry
Task Force -- Nancy Brown, Dawn FI1IlIl and Leah Peterson.
Ms WlChn bnefly hIghlighted some features of the proposed ordinance: the tree replacement
polIcy, the concept of heritage trees, the licensing of tree removaVtnmming contractors; the
requIrement of permIts.
Several CommissIon members expressed a concern about how the proposed ordinance would
affect pnvate property owners. Ms. Widin said the mtent was not to infringe on the pnvate
property owners; the ordmance is dIrected toward developers and the protectIon of
envIronmentally sensitive areas such as ravines and bluffs.
Don McKenzIe, 72nd Street, expressed a concern about the pOSSIble impact on small developers.
For example, he said he had purchased about 10 acres of property that has hundred of trees. He
SaId the proposed ordinance would probably made it impOSSIble or cost prohibitive for him to
ever develop the property.
Ms. Peterson showed photos of trees that have been cut down by a "small developer" and stated
the CIty needs a tree protection ordinance.
Several Comrmssion members expressed a concern that the ordinance would InfrInge on an
owner's nght and make smaller sItes unbuildable. It was suggested that the ordinance should
Include an appeals or variance process. Mrs. Bealka, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved to continue
Planning Comrmssion
February. 8, 1999
.
the heanng untIl the Commission's March 8 meeting for possible Inclusion of a vanance process,
all In favor.
Other items'
Adult EntertaInment Ordinance - Mr. Russell noted regulation of such businesses is a legally
sensitIve area, the City has taken and adapted existing ordmances
In the diScussion, there was some confusion as to the regulatIon regarding distance from eXistIng
buddmgs, Mr Zoller was concerned that the ordmance might allow such a bUSIness to be
located next to a bar. Mr. Fontaine suggested adding a restriction regarding the proximIty to
park/recreatIon areas It was agreed to contmue the matter to the Comrmsslon's March meetmg
and ask City Attorney Magnuson to attend, Mr. Zoller, seconded by Mr. Wald, made that in the
fonn of a motIon
Special setbacks for malor roads in the expansIOn area - Mr. Russell s31d the proposal IS
Intended to preserve a sense of rural character in the expansion area by increasing the setback on
major roads - County Highways 15 and 12, Trunk Highway 96, McKuslck Road and perhaps
Boutwell Road - from the existing 30 feet to 100 feet, as well as 75 foot setback from the
railroad line in the area. Mr. FontaIne suggested ehmmating Boutwell Road from the proposal,
due to eXlstmg development Staff was drrected to refine the proposal and return for further
discussion
.
Mrs Bealka, seconded by Mr. Wald, moved to adjOurn at 9 15 p.m
Respectfully sub1ll1tted,
Sharon Baker
RecordIng Secretary
.
.
Planmng Comnnssion
March 8, 1999
City Attorney David Magnuson was present for tlus discussion. Mr. Russell noted that based on
the preVIous discussion at the Planmng Comnnssion, adult entertamment uses would be allowed
With a special use penmt In the BUSIness Park Commercial District.
Mr Wel(lner referred to the setback from parks and asked whether the RecreatIon Center would
be considered a park use, and whether the School District admmistratIon office on Greeley Street
might be considered a school use. Mr. Magnuson, and other Comnnssion members, agreed that
the Rec Center should be considered park use, language to that effect Will be added to the
Ordinance defimtlons. Mr. Zoller asked that language be added that an adult entertamment
bUSIness cannot be located adjacent to an estabhshment that sells hquor.
Mr. FontaJ.ne questioned whether the proposed 500 foot setback from residential structures IS
suffiCient There was diSCUSSIOn as to whether IncreasIng the setback to 1,000 nnght be too
restrictive and effectively prohIbit any adult entertaJ.nment uses, thereby malong the ordmance
unconstitutional John Baer, member of the Open Space Comnnttee, suggestmg domg some GIS
modelIng to determIne the number of aVaJ.lable sites based on the 500 and 1,000 foot setbacks
Mr. Magnuson saJ.d he thought the Ordinance should come back to the Planmng CommiSSIOn,
and he suggested having Mr. Russell do some GIS modelmg to consider the 1,000 foot setback
.
Mr. Zoller, seconded by Mr. RheInberger, moved to continue conSideration of the Ordinance to
the Apnl Planmng Commission meetIng; all In favor.
Case No ZAT/99-2 A Zomng Ordinance Text amendment modrfYIng the accessory
umts/structure 10 TradItional ReSidential (TR) District. ThIs case was continued to the Apnl
meetIng Pnor to the start of the regular agenda, Robert and Paula Kroemng, Neuman Realty,
expressed a concern about the pOSSible Impact on the reSidential character of the neighborhoods.
Case No. ZAT/99-1 A Zomng Ordmance Text amendment estabhshmg tree protectIon
regulations requIring licensing of commercial tree trimmers, protecting slgmficant and hentage
trees, estabhshmg tree replacement or payment for removal of trees. City of Stillwater applicant.
Forester Kathy Wldln reViewed changes to the amendment made to address concerns expressed
10 the February meeting diSCUSSIOn Mr. Fontaine asked about the issued raised in Don
McKenzie's letter opposmg the proposal City Attorney Magnuson noted that 10 acres IS not a
small parcel He also noted that developers Will add the cost of tree replacement to the cost of
lots, and he said the proposal had been reviewed by the Liberty on the Lake and Legends of
Stillwater developers, both of whom saJ.d the ordinance was something they could hve With.
Mr Rheinberger expressed hIs oplmon that the ordmance Will not make any difference 20 years
Into the future. Mr. Zoller noted the city IS respondmg to a call for a tree protection ordmance by
city residents Mr Zoller raised the question of whether a potential developer could get around
the ordinance by clear cutting a parcel pnor to development. Mr. Magnuson said a definition of
clear cuttmg could be added to the ordInance language.
.
Plannmg CommIssIon
March 8, 1999
.
Mr. Fontame asked about the appeal process. Mr. Russell explamed an appeal would be made to
the tree adnumstrator who would consIder the Issues with input from the forester. The person
makmg an appeal would go to the Planmng Commission and CIty CouncIl if not In agreement
WIth the deCIsion of the tree adnumstrator (Mr. Russell).
Speakmg on behalf of the proposal were members of the forestry task force, Nancy Brown, Leah
l
Peterson, Angela Anderson and John Baer
Mr. RheInberger moved to deny the proposed amendment; motion lied for lack of a second
Mr Zoller, seconded by Ms. Owen, moved to approve the amendment, with Mr Magnuson and
Ms WldIn to work on language to Incorporate the defimtlon of clear cuttIng In the ordlI13.llce.
MotIon passed 5-1, WIth Mr. RheInberger votIng no.
Case No. ZAT/99-3 A Zomng Orchnance Text amendment reqwnng special bwldtng setbacks
for arterial, collectors and raJ.lroad tracts. CIty of StIllwater applIcant
Mr. RheInberger, seconded by Mr. Hultman, moved to approve the amendment as proposed;
motIon passed unanimously
Other bUSIness'
· There was a bnef diSCUSSIon regarling Mr. FontaIne's memo dealIng WIth procedure
guIdelInes. In the dISCUSSIon, the proposed Charter amendment dealIng WIth ConflIct of
Interest was ratsed. Mr. Russell adVIsed that if a member has any questions about a pOSSIble
conflIct, the member should contact CIty Attorney Magnuson
.
The recordIng secretary left at 10.10 p.m.
Respectfully submItted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary
.
.
March 4, 1999
City of Sttllwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
AttentIon Mr Steve Russell
RegardlDg Proposed Draft Tree Orchnance
Dear Mr Russell,
SlDce I will be out of the country, I regret that I will be unable to attend the Planning
Commission Meeting scheduled for March 8, 1999 at winch there is expected to be chscussion
of the draft ordinance
I do have comments and concerns related to developers of small parcels that I would appreciate
. you bringing to the attention of the Commission
I have documented these in the attached memo
Thanks once ag8.1n for the understanding of the Planning Commission in this matter
S~~l~~
&:{lc/Kinf.t~,.,.
12620 72nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082-9322
enclosure
cc Nile Kriesel
Jerry Fontaine
.
March 4, 1999
.
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
AttentIon Planmng CormmsslOn
RegardIng Proposed Draft Tree Ordmance--Input
The opportunIty to provide input and comment to the subject draft IS greatly appreciated
The unportance of preservation of trees and the natural environment they harbor is certainly
unportant to the City and ItS residents Tins IS also evidenced by the fact that Stillwater already
has In force a stnct, yet reasonable, tree ordInance addressing land development
I) The proposed draft ordinance IS structured In a way that would financially inlublt
development of small 1 0 to 25 acre land parcels due to prohibitive costs and restrictions These
requirements may be workable for large parcels, but are not adaptable to these small parcels
.
It is strongly recommended to maIntaIn the existIng tree ordmance or at vety least. to clearly
exempt small 10 to 25 acre parcels from the financial penalties that would be incurred under the
draft regulation
The draft baSIcally places a significant penalty or development tax on small parcel development
that is out of proportion compared to larger tract development Tins is because there are
typically far fewer options on a small parcel in terms of where to place structures, roads, etc
If we are to make appealing and saleable homes for Stillwater residents on a small wooded
parcel there will, of necessity, be trees that will need to be removed and recycled This IS an
obvious fact that should not result In penalties Imposed by government There are very bmited
options on a small parcel To start a fund for others to use at the expense of the landowner
(especially when a landowner planted the trees in the first place) is a prime example of over-
regulation and over-taxatIon and over-involvement by local government
In additiOn, there is no economy of scale In development of small 1 0 to 25 acre parcels The
financial incentive to do a small project is marginal at best Because of that fact, there is
actually strong incentive on the part of the small parcel developer to minimize any unnecessary
loss of trees and vegetatIOn In order to maXlnllZe the appeal, value and salability of the lots
There is no need for addItional government regulation and penalties to force this to happen It
will occur naturally in a capitahstic society .
1
.
.
.
The city IS apparently interested m planned development of newly annexed lands To adopt an
ordinance that dIctates cash penalties, expensive detail studies and cash, 150% above the cost
already incurred for work completed, to be in escrow accounts for two years is counter
productive and a disincentive for owners or developers to mitiate small development projects
In addition, it actually acts as a disincentive to even plant trees on these parcels when one will
end up being penalized for it in the future That is counterproductive to encouraging natural
enhancement
Based of examples of the 'tree tax' given in the first 1/99 draft, my calculations show that the
bulk of any financial mcentive to develop a small parcel essentially evaporates for the owner and
is transferred to the city or elsewhere Adoption of such an orchnance could also result in
decreasing the effective development value of small parcels containmg trees This could be a
liability that the City may not want to incur
It is strongly recommended to maintain the exJ.sting tree ordinance or at very least. to clearly
exempt small 10 to 25 acre parcels from the finanCIal penalties that would be incurred under the
draft regulation
2) The definition of "development" in the draft dated 3/2/99 goes far beyond the apparent
intent of the development aspect of the tree ordinance This is based on the 1/29/99 Steve
Russell memo to the Planning Commission That memo clearly states ''The ordinance
requrres tree preservation review when new construction or remodeling occurs " The draft
definition of development literally states that it mcludes "Any human made change to improved
or unimproved land " That breadth of scope is impossible to enforce uniformly Beyond
that, the definition is inconsistent with subd 3 Applicability descriptions
On this point it IS recommended that the defimtion of 'development' be clearly limited to the
common understandmg of the tenn 'development' which is enforceable That is. new
construction. remodehng or subdividmg
Thanks to the Planning Commission for therr understandmg m this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Don McKenzie
12620 72nd Street North
Stillwater, MN 55082-9322
cc Nile Knesel
Jeny Fontaine
2
.
March 31,1999
Mr Steve Russell
Community Development Director
City of Stillwater
216 N 4th St
Shllwater, MN 55082
RE Proposed Tree Ordmance
Dear Steve'
Contractor Property Developers Company, as developer of LIberty on the Lake, .
IS requeshng formally that the entire Liberty project be exempted from the
regulahons contained withIn the proposed tree protection ordinance scheduled
to be heard by the City CouncIl on April 6,1999. Our request is based on the
following
1 Liberty m ItS entirety received preliminary plat and PUD approvals from the
CIty CouncIl in 1998. Those approved plans and all of the support design and
planning that went into them were based on ordmances in force at the time of the
approvals To subject Liberty to a new and totally dIfferent set of regulations at
tlus point m time is, in essence, to unilaterally amend our 1998 mutual
agreements without our consent.
2 Liberty Phase I is well under way and we anhcipate making an application for
Phase II in the near future to meet market demand We believe that it is very
unfaIr for the City to impose new regulation on Liberty as an estabhshed
business operation with costs and budgets based on the 1998 approval standards
and condItions.
3 We belIeve that Liberty has committed to and implemented extensive and
extraordmary efforts toward environmental protection as part of both our
coq~orate philosophy and the 1998 City approval standards imposed on Liberty. .
CPDC Corporate Offices:
The Quadrant Building - 7100 Northland Circle - SUite 108 - Minneapolis, MN 55428
phone: (612)971-0477 - fax: (612)971-0576 - email' cpdc@schererbros com
.
.
.
We respectfully submit that those efforts have a very high value and sufficiency
such that additional new regulation is totally unwarranted
Thank you and the Council for your considerations. I would be pleased to
discuss any comments you may have at your convemence.
~p
Homer H. Tompkins III
President
, oJ " r
.. .
.
.
.
APR- 2-99 FiI 9:08 AM
C/l: a:>~d
P. 2
~
The Pemtom Land Company
"'~DIIM
mEN I'IMEtMUESOrAMM4
(612f_oOTI6 . fAX 9.1H63S
Mayor and city Council
City of Stillwater
216 North Fourth Sttect
Sti11water~ M'mn 55082
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
The purposed new regulations regarding trees nms counter to the reputation
Stillwater has as a reasonable community interested in controlling the
estClllAting cost of housing.
In the review of this proposed regulation I offer the following:
The Purpose section of the draft C011Sidms landowners ~ as the
"communi1y's existing 'tree resource" but only applies this oNinsm,.,e to
residential and ~ercial development of land. Is ., true 4Ccommunity"s
tIee resource, i.e. ptKkJaDCl and public open space. excluded and only 1rCC$
privately owued iuclud.ed in this new regulation? Is land not slated for
development excluded and is there a Constitutional question here?
The Applicability section is ovemacltil\g including one acre ofllll1d with S
trees of6 inches in diameter. '~ne) a 43,560 sq. 1\ patCCl of land with 5
trees now following under the hands of government control!
Subd.. 7 as indicemd ,move applies unfairly 10 only to two classifications of
~ ancl the treo pw~ v~-ds of the Ci1y seem not to be included in
this regu)atioD but ate to be adopted by tho City Co\m.QU &om "time to
time." What does this mean? Are the ~ not in this ~?
Subd. 7b requires the app1icant 10 retain. a forester, 1andsc;ape atebitcct, or
land surveyor and this pcISOI1 nmst by approwd by the City. What criteria
will the City use to disappro~? Subd. 7b3d IeqW:res a delineation of a 100ft
by 100ft area covered with" native woody vegetation. " What does this
mean?
SubcL 9 not only requires replacement oftIeCS but places an J1YHII1thorizecl
tax on the land to fund the City"s NatutaI Raource Fund. This additionaJ.
unauthorized tax needs to be removed ftom this p1opOSed regulation.
SE:9BL.E:Bl:19.0I
AN~dWO~ ON~~ WOLwad.WO~~ 9~IB0 BB-l:0-~d~
Art- ~-~~ tXl ~.U~ AI
~
The Pemtom Land Company
"J5fD ~..w
... .......BIOI'A...
16121937.0714 . fAX "'-1635
"Subd 9c6 admits that ifthc ordinanoe does not work on heavily wooded sites
which most ordioa~ will not, theref<<e the C~ will theft impose an
i~ fee at the rate 01$100 per caHpcr inch. This will only serve to drive
the cost of housing up since aU fees are evenn.Jly paid by the (X)DSll~er.
The City should ask existing land owners and prospective rommunity
developers to take a S8II3p~ woode4 pen:el of laud in tho City and pro forma
a oost of development proposal so the excessive ccst of this section is clearly
uoderstood by all parties concemcd.
Subd 11 requires a security or boncl in the amoUDt of 150010.. Again, another
exoessive provision of this chaft which should be red.ucecL 110% is more
than adequate since the c~ of loss of even a majority of the trees is slim.
A City in the western suburbs passed an ord.inano: not as onerous as this one
and they became SO blIrcIened with appeals and workshops that I believe they
are nDW revampiDs the or4inance~
I would ask the City CouncD to allow landowners and members of the
development community to meet with City staff to prepare more detailed
study into this ordinance prior to further considcrins the adoption of this
regulation. I am also of the assumption that already approvecl neigbborhoods
such as The Legends and. Liberty will not fiill UDder the zequirements of a
new ordinance once approved.
OJ)Ut-
Daniel I.
C/E: an'dd
c:lC'QQ~C'a7Ia nl
.. I II ' .1... .
1. oJ
.
,
f
· MEMO
.
.
To:
From:
Subject:
Mayor and CIty Councd .A /
Steve Russell, Community Development Drrector It.,.....-'
A Zomng OrdInance Amendment Requinng 100 foot Setbacks for structures along
Major Roads and Railroad Tracks
March 31, 1999
Date:
Background
On February 8, 1999 and March 8, 1999, the Plannmg ComnnsslOn consIdered and approved the
specIal setback zomng ordInance for major roads m the expanSIon area.
The requIrement IS consIstent With the ComprehenSIve Plan Greenway/Buffer PolIcy for the
urban/rural boundary and proVIde space for buffering between major roads m resIdential areas
The Planmng ComnnsslOn at their meetmg of March 8, 1999, approved the ordmance
recommendmg It to Councd for approval
Recommendation' Approval of ordmance
Attachment Ordmance, staffreport and mmutes of 3-8-99.
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Plannmg Commission V
Steve Russell, Community Development Director
An Ordinance RequIring Special Road Setbacks Case No. ZAT/99-3
March 4, 1999
,At your meeting of February 8, 1999, a staff report dIscussed the need and special setbacks for
major state lughways, county roads and railroad right of ways. The attached amendment
establishes a 100 foot setback for state and county roads and a 75 foot setback for the railroad
nght of way.
Recommendation: Approval
Attachment. Draft ordinance
"
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
Ordinance No. 99-_
Zoning Ordinance Amendment Establishing Special Setbacks for Major Roads
Chapter 31, Subdivision 24, (17) of the Zoning Ordinance
SubdIvision 24. Supplemental Regulations.
(17) Special Setbacks.
The followmg specIal setbacks are required for development along major roads and
railroad nght of way.
Road or facility
Setback
TH 96 (Stonebridge Trall to CR 15)
McKusick Road (Neal to CR 15)
CR 12 (Northland to CR 15)
CR 15 (Th 36 to Th 96)
Rallroad
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
100 feet
75 feet
These setbacks are in addition to normal setbacks as required by the zoning dIstrict regulations.
Adopted thIS
day of
, 1999.
Attest, city clerk
Mayor Jay Kunble
Lfl/
{;.-1J
~
L-~ ]"-: . ~~_~
, . '
, l .. ~.
) _ j.::J- ~.I ,_4;, _ ,..:
. J L-- - J . I .. '
"'---. L... I"
.1 I I.., /'
· f... ...
..: 01--.....)
t
L
. ~ ~
~ -~:z-
~A--r-l;f
51U~
Jr, ~
-L- l
(-
.,.z.-.:y
\ --~
,I ,~
t..... .
..: -,
-\
..': 1 ,}::.-=__--'
.I
I
,
,-
I
I ~ I
~ I I
I
-,
~
"~
"-
:
,
.
~'n
"~l
. ".- tJ~ --AIo.' . t -,:0 ;;.:- =.-&7"
- ... ... ., r ... ...
.. ~ I ~ r I /II . .. : ~ ~ ~."
" ... ... ..
-. (f-::-:;- - t - - ,-~=- . -=-- ..-,
...._-~.... ......~ -.0:,'...
I c:.. .... .. . 1..."4
. --., ,'':: \: ~- ~'~'-" ~
. " . \ :: ."
l~,_ J'L
- -. - ,,-J~~
_.J~:_.. _
'\ - .. .. ..II....
~-
.
t JI\
"
~
"
-\
'w
e-
'~_. \I)~
'.
t :
r
:4
~
J"
.
. '
__ _<.L.._ _
.,1 --' '~~~3-::~~-':--
..v-:llr" ~t;:- ..z~~ u..r ... _ .._...:......
'[...11 -...~ \11'''' -'71
- I...... ,M.
J~ ~ _ :":':"_
I ~-b.-~-'" ~~~
'::"0' :;...r:f-;:.F'".;''''..:.::..-
.'- -."'. -p'::" w_~"""::':'''''
, . -.... ~
1....,:'1.......=
- ~
, , -
'\\ ......._~
.
I;'
,
~q-'-~-I-'I
'..
"'-
.... 'fwII a.. ......"
-- M- i
V ' <'
I,
," /:'
I'
- $'
I ;
;;~
~~~'r
-t.~'r-
or......r-:-..J
~ co!. -
~~...-"
:-~:J:7.I-",=" _
.~f..q,
.;:. "I
..
,w'
..
;~.... r
!.,.\.j -...!
- -. t.,
r - ..,
... ..~-. -........-- ""
, ;' '1~
.
,
... r-I
.1..--..:-
p"__.
. . .
:::......... ..... ......: _ ....~-d .1
" ,
,
'I
-,-
....-.--;- -
'~
,_ J
"
,
VICInity Map
,
J
I .~
"-rA:.,--'
'f
o
3646
Scale In Feet
--............~.----
.............. ....0........,
....."...... W""'9MCNIIWIlIICM
'""......,.., . oMG ""~
1lUIPONI_WV'~COUIlIt'''naI
,.........,....,,~
-... -.......c~...,.... 0_
....... (1121....."
""___1MIqI '......21 fIB
,..
,
.
.
.
Planning Commission ;/
February. 8, 1999 ___
the hearing until the Commission's March 8 meeting for possible inclusion of a variance process'
all in favor
Other items.
Adult Entertainment Ordmance - Mr. Russell noted regulation of such businesses IS a legally
sensitive area; the CIty has taken and adapted existing ordmances.
In the dIscussIon, there was some confusion as to the regulation regarding distance from existing
buildmgs; Mr. Zoller was concerned that the ordinance might allow such a business to be
located next to a bar. Mr. Fontaine suggested adding a restriction regarding the proximity to
park/recreation areas. It was agreed to continue the matter to the CommissIon's March meetIng
and ask CIty Attorney Magnuson to attend; Mr. Zoller, seconded by Mr. Wald, made that m the
form of a motion.
Special setbacks for malor roads in the expansion area - Mr Russell said the proposal is
intended to preserve a sense of rural character in the expansion area by increasing the setback on
major roads - County Highways 15 and 12, Trunk HIghway 96, McKusick Road and perhaps
Boutwell Road - from the existing 30 feet to 100 feet, as well as 75 foot setback from the
railroad lme m the area. Mr. Fontame suggested eliminating Boutwell Road from the proposal,
due to eXlstmg development. Staff was directed to refine the proposal and return for further
diSCUSSIOn
Mrs Bealka, seconded by Mr Wald, moved to adjOurn at 9: 15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recordmg Secretary
",
\
Planning Commission
March 8, 1999
.
City Attorney David Magnuson was present for this dIscussion. Mr. Russell noted that based on
the previous dIscussion at the Planning COIDmlssion, adult entertainment uses would be allowed
with a special use permit in the Busmess Park Commercial District.
Mr. Weidner referred to the setback from parks and asked whether the RecreatIon Center would
be considered a park use, and whether the School Distnct administration office on Greeley Street
might be considered a school use Mr. Magnuson, and other Commission members, agreed that
the Rec Center should be consIdered park use; language to that effect wIll be added to the
Ordinance defmitIons. Mr. Zoller asked that language be added that an adult entertainment
bUSIness cannot be located adjacent to an estabhshment that sells hquor.
Mr. FontaIne questioned whether the proposed 500 foot setback from residential structures is
sufficient. There was discussion as to whether increasmg the setback to 1,000 mIght be too
restrictive and effectively prolubit any adult entertainment uses, thereby making the ordinance
unconstitutional. John Baer, member of the Open Space Committee, suggesting domg some GIS
modeling to determme the number of available sites based on the 500 and 1,000 foot setbacks.
Mr. Magnuson said he thought the Ordmance should come back to the Planning Commission,
and he suggested having Mr Russell do some GIS modelmg to consider the 1,000 foot setback.
Mr. Zoller, seconded by Mr Rhemberger, moved to continue consideration of the Ordmance to .
the Apnl Planning Commission meeting, all In favor.
Case No. ZAT/99-2 A Zonmg Ordmance Text amendment modIfymg the accessory
units/structure in TraditIonal Residential (TR) Distnct. This case was continued to the April
meetmg. Pnor to the start of the regular agenda, Robert and Paula Kroening, Neuman Realty,
expressed a concern about the possible impact on the reSIdential character of the neIghborhoods.
Case No. ZAT/99-1 A Zoning Ordmance Text amendment establishIng tree protection
regulations reqwring hcensing of commercial tree tmnmers, protectIng significant and heritage
trees, establishing tree replacement or payment for removal of trees. CIty of Stillwater applicant.
Forester Kathy WIdin reviewed changes to the amendment made to address concerns expressed
in the February meeting discussion. Mr. Fontaine asked about the Issued raised in Don
McKenzie's letter opposing the proposal. CIty Attorney Magnuson noted that 10 acres is not a
small parcel. He also noted that developers will add the cost of tree replacement to the cost of
lots, and he said the proposal had been reviewed by the Liberty on the Lake and Legends of
Stillwater developers, both of whom said the ordmance was something they could hve WIth.
Mr. Rheinberger expressed his opinion that the ordinance will not make any dIfference 20 years
into the future. Mr. Zoller noted the city is responding to a call for a tree protection ordinance by
city residents Mr. Zoller raised the question of whether a potential developer could get around
the ordinance by clear cutting a parcel prior to development. Mr. Magnuson said a definition of .
clear cutting could be added to the ordinance language.
.
.
.
Memorandum
Apn12,1999
TO:
Mayor and CIty Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles tt!"
CIty Engmeer
SUBJECT:
McKusick Lake Management Plan
DISCUSSION:
As part of the Trout Stream Protectlon Plan developed m the expansIon area ADAR, large
amounts of storm water runoff would be duected away from Browns Creek mto Lake McKuSICk In
order to aVOId floodmg at McKuSICk Lake, we ongmally had proposed to lower the lake level to Its
penmtted elevatIon and allow the wetland northwest of the lake to flood The cost of the
Improvements necessary to accomphsh tlus portIon of the protectlon plan exceeds $1 6 mIllIon.
Another Impact of the ongInal proposed plan was that McKuSICk Lake would have to be
lowered over one foot m order to prOVide addltlonal storage for large storm events The
homeowners around McKuSICk Lake found tlus portIon of the plan unacceptable There were many
concerns about the aesthetlcs of the lake, loss of lakeshore property and an mcrease m aquatlc plants
and vegetatlon Therefore m October 1998 the CIty Council authonzed an addItlonal study of
McKusick Lake A task force was formed that mcluded members of the DNR, CIty staff, area
reSIdents and the Watershed DIStnCt The objectIve of the task force was to mamtam or Improve the
phYSIcal condItIon and recreatlonal swtablhty of McKuSICk Lake
The task force came up With SIX pnmary recommendatlons that mcluded a slgmficant
modlficatlon to the Browns Creek Protection ProJect. Instead ofpondmg large amounts of water m
the wetland to the northwest and lowenng the lake level, It was proposed that mcreased flows could
be passed through the eXIsting storm water system wInch takes water through downtown Stlllwater
to the nver. It IS expected that tlus optlon will have slgmficant costs, however It avOIds the need to
build the dike, fill In pOrtIOns of the wetland, rebuild McKusICk Road and lDltIgate for loss of
wetlands. The ehlDlnatlon of these portIons of the project Will reduce the dIversIon project cost by
approxImately $1 mllhon On the other side, It IS estlmated that there Will be slgmficant costs in
upgradmg the CIty'S downtown system The cost for these Improvements are unknown at this tIme,
but could approach $1 mllhon. The main conclusion of the task force IS that It appears the costs for
Apnl 2, 1999
the ongmal optIon versus the new option would be approximately the same, but slgmficant benefits
to McKuslck Lake and wetlands north ofMcKuslck Lake that makes tins optIon very desIrable.
.
A summary of the task force recommendatIons IS hsted on the second page of the executIve
summary m the beginnIng of the report. Staff offers the followmg comments and recommendatIons
for each of the task force recommendatIons
1. Raise the approved normal water elevation on McKusick to approximately 853.
Tins reqwres all npanan landowners to sign an easement over to the Clty/DNR If
we were to carry out the proposed modified lake management strategy, tins would be
mandatory In order to carry tins forward a registered land surveyor would have to be
hired, dIrected to place stacks along all propertIes, easements would need to be
prepared, and all landowners contacted and asked to Sign the easements. The cost of
Innng a land surveyor and complete the legal work on these easements IS estImated to
cost $10,000 - $20,000 dependIng on level of cooperatIon of the property owners
The cost of completmg tins survey can eventually be charged to the AUAR
Staff recommends that Councll authonze tins work to begm unmedlately after Item 2
has been completed
2 Evaluate downstream channel below McKusick Lake.
The new proposed plan will route significant addItIonal quantItIes of water through .
the downtown system Therefore, portIons of the system may need to be retrofitted or
Improved In order to obtaIn a tentatIve deSign and cost estunate, staff recommends
that Councll conSider authonzmg entenng mto an agreement With BRA to complete a
study of the McKuslck Lake Downstream Conveyance System (see Councll agenda
Item)
3. Construct wet detention basins in developments.
This has been and Will contmue to be a requirement of all development
4. Improve the recreational suitability of Lake McKusick.
Adopt an ordinance prohibiting the use of gasoline motors.
If Councll concurs, they should dIrect the City Attorney to proceed With prepanng an
ordmance
Install a public canoe landing, construct a fishing pier, work with DNR to stock
game fish, and install a winter areation system if needed.
The cost of lmprovmg pubhc fislnng and accesslblhty could approach over $100,000
With the creatIon of a canoe landmg, fislnng pier and an aeratIon system Councll
should determme If tins IS something they Wish to budget for m the upcommg budget
.
2
.
.
.
Apnl 2, 1999
process and whether they Wish to make It a pnonty for CIty staff to work on the
plannmg and engmeenng of the vanous components
Develop trails around the lake and link with other areas of the City.
Currently, the Plannmg Department IS workmg WIth a consultant to develop a
pedestnan and nature trml m tlns area. The consultant should be made aware of the
findmgs m tlns report and adapt any trmls m the area accordmgly
5 Improve shoreland management of the lake.
n IS estImated that It would cost approxImately $10,000 to set up a shoreland
management demonstratIon area and organize natural plantmgs on pnvate propertIes.
Notlnng has been budgeted m 1999 for tlns type of Improvements. CouncIl should
determme If they Wish proceed With tlns Item and dIscuss ways for financmg
6.
Adopt non-structural methods of protecting water quality.
CIty staffhas already adopted modIficatIons to ItS street-sweepmg program that
mc1udes Ingber mtensIty sweepmg m the early spnng WIth an emphasis m the dIrect
watersheds of our lakes. The results are that all the lake subwatersheds have been
swept once before the end of March 1999 The CIty has begun a publIc educatIon
program through ItS FertIlIZer OrdInance for the purpose of water qUalIty CouncIl
may Wish to take actIon to mcrease publIc awareness usmg the CIty
newsletter/websIte or mmlmgs to mdIVIdual property owners. In addItIon, staffis
aware of a VIdeo on lake water qUalIty that may be avmlable that could be arred on the
publIc access channel
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that CouncIl reVIew the attached report on the McKusICk Lake
Management Plan, mc1udmg all the recommendations by the task force Staff requests CouncIl
prOVIde mput on each of the Items lIsted above
ACTION REOUlRED:
PrOVIde staff With opmlOns on each of the issues rmsed m the report.
3
.
.
.
1214/1213/99
NO. 12115 1i11212
1213: 'If?
MAGNUSCN LAW FIRM ... 43l2lEl8l2l9
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STlLl.WATER CITY CODE BY ENACI'lNG 121-147
A SECfION IMPLBMENTING THE CONFUCT OF INTEREST AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS OF THE STIU.W ATEa CITY CHARTER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrI'Y OF STILLWATER DOES ORDAIN
Section 21.14.
Subd. 1. Pu~B. The proper operation of democratic government requU'es that public
officials be iDdependent. impartial and responsible to the people; that governmental
decisioDS aDd policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental strudure; that
public of&e not be used for penoDllaain, and tbat the public have confidence in the
iategrity of its 1000rnmeat. lD recognition of these goals. there is hereby established a
Code of ErJucs for all publIC officials whctber elected or appoiDtcd. The purpose of the
Code of Etbics section is to din:cc disclosure of City ofJieials of private iDteresrs m l1UI1teI'S
affecting tbe City aDd to csClbllilh etJJicalstandards of conduct for all such officials be
sett1Dg forth rhosc types of activities tbat are incompatible with tile best interests of the
City .
SUbd. 2. Definitlnnll.
(1) .Conflict of iDterest- means any iDtentioaal treatmeDt by an official of a matter in
which the ofticial baa aD berest. clearly separate from tbat of the aeDDral pubbe.
(2) -Domg busmass- maaIII eupgecl in any contractual relatlOnsbip with the City of
Stillwater, or making applicadon for a rclariODShip or for any rellcf or benefit available
from tbe City.
(3) "Interest- mcaas -viDa a private finanCIal interest separate from tJW of me gcaeral
public.
(4) 'Matter'meaaa any CODtract, permit license, ZOIWlI decision, payment or belJetit.
(5) .Official- mew any penon who bas beeo elected, appointed at' hired to a poSillOI1
bavq supervisory and dcc:lsion-mAlrillg authority in the CIty of StUlwater including, but
not limited to, any of the following:
<a> Member of a City board or colDlDission;
(b) holder of a City elective office;
(c) the department bead of each City department;
(d) tbe City CoorcliDator Ot Administrator;
(0) the City Attorney and all members of their firm;
(f) my otber person designated by the City Covncil from time to time.
I
04/03/99
03:07
MAGNUSCN LAW FIRM -+ 4-""08809
NO.01S [;103
Subd. 3 Disclosure ReQllired Within tJnrty (30) days after April 30, 1999 and wirbin .
thirty (30) days after r.aIdDg tbe oath of oftice ami within thirty (30) days after any change
in a statement previoualy fIled. each official must file on forms approved by the City
Council and obtained from. the City Clert:
(1) With respect to real property, aot including the official's homestead. located in
the City of StUlwl1er:
(a) The location of any property in whICh the official has or has bad an
werest within the previous three (3) years.
(b) tile location ofpropeny in which the official knows his or her spouse or
minor child to have a present interest or an iauerest within tbc previous
three (3) years;
ee) the DIme of the person possessing each interest referred to m parappbs
(a) and (b) above;
(4) the nature of each iDterest referred 10 in paragraphs <a> and (b) above
(2) With respect to any nou-OWDerslup busiDess relationship the ofticiaI bas With
any company, parmership, firm, corporation. labor Ull1on, association or other
entity domg business with the Ciry of Stillwater:
(a) The DIIDC of any eutily;
(b) the title of eacb position held in connection with each entity;
(c) whether compensation is mvolved in CODnection with each position. .
(3) With respect to any ownership inrerest constituting more than five percent (5")
of me total ownership many C01pOI'atian, firm, Pll1Dcrship or other entity doing
busmess with me City of Stillwater, iDdicate.
(a) The name of tile entity
(b) The type of Ownersbip imerest.
Subd 4. Prohibited CondllGl. No official may do any of the following'
(1) Use Ius or her position to secure any special privilege or exempboll for
thcmself 01 lilY other;
(2) no member of a City Board or Commission or eJected official may act as agent
or attorney for UIOtber in any matter before the govemiDg body, board or
commisaion on which he or she is a member;
(3) directly or tndirect1y soliCIt, accept or recejve any compensation. gift rewa.."1f
or aratuUy in my tOl'lD in coDDeetion with any matter or proceeding CODDCCtcQ with
Or related to tbe duties of his or her office except as may be otherwise permitted
by law;
2
.
04/03/99
.
.
.
03:07
MFlGNl..JSD.I LAW FIRM -+ 43EB309
NO.01S 1;104
(4) enter into any COJdraCt with the City of Slillwater unless otherwise authorized
by Jaw;
(5) except u otherwise authorized by law, IcnowiDgly enter mto a diacu5sion of or
vote upon mauer iD wh1cb he or slm may have an mrercst, or in an)' l1W1JJa"
iDOueJtce a vote or decis10ll of any other offICial 011 the matter;
(6) E.xcepc:.. otbenrise provided by law every office must disclose an matena1
iDt'ormadoD pa.'tIiDiIJI to potcDtial conthcts of mterest as they arise and must recuse
themao1ves from parricipatiDg iD any dtSCUSS10B or decision on the matter UDder
COasideratiODi
(7) use private or coafideDdal dara co1Jccted by the City of Stlllwarer to advance or
benefit ms or her own tnrerests;
Subd. 5. D~iMfa: ilJlulUn4imt, 'Ibc City Attomey must inspect all material filed with
the City as prompdy as is ...ary ro Insure comply with the provisloDs of thta seetiol1.
The City Attoraey mu&t inDMilaely DOtify the iDdividual requited to tile a dOCllmeDt if
a written compl8iDt is tiled widl the City Atto.mey by any regiJtcred voter alleging. or it
otherwj.e appears, tbat a dneumeul filed is inaccurate or does DOt comply witb the
provisious of this -doa, or that die individual bas failed to file a dornuuent mquired by
this seedOD.
Subd. 6. VinISltv-:~ 1be City AIUJrDtj must inves1ipte any 'Vio1ation wbich
is alle,cd in a wriUa complaint IDd must within thirty (30) days after the filing of the
complaint mate a public findfnl of wherl1er or DOt there is probable cause to believe a
violat1on occllD"ecl. The deadlinft for action OD any wriaen complaint may be extended if
w=ssary. Witbia a rcasoDlbJe time after be&inninB an iDvcstigation of lID iDdividual or
assceiatioll, tile City At.ttJrMy will mtlt'y that Judividual or association of tile fact of the
inves1igat101l. 1be City Attamey may malce no ftnding of whether or DOt tbere Is probable
cause to believe a violation baa cx:cumd wtd1aut notifYing tbe imti'Vidual or 85SOCiatiou of
the DIturc of die aIlcgadcms aDd dordiDg an opportDlity to aoswer those degatioas. Any
bearing or action COftCOrIIiJII any c:caplaint or investigation otbcr than a findq ccmcemiDg
probable c:ause is CODfidcDtial. Until the City Attorney makes a public finding coaceming
probable cause'
(a) No member, employee, or alent of the City Attorney may disclose to any
iDdividual any iDformatiou obtained by that member, employee, or agent
cmaming aD)' complaint or investigation except as required to cany out the
investigation or take action in the matter as authorized by this chapter; and
(b) after the City AItomey makes a public flDding of probable cause rile City
Attorney must report that findl1., to the law enforcement authority other than 1bc
City Attorney who has apeed to act 18 special prosecutor for the purpose of this
section; UKl
(c) upon tbc CODviaion of any person of a violanon of this c.bapter tbe office
employmcm or position held by that person becomes vacanti and
3
1214/03/99
03: l2l7
MAGNl.ISCN LAW FIRM -+ 43038El9
NO. 12115 gl2l5
(d) upon the CODYXuon of any person of a vioJanon of this cbapter any permit .
Jicease or zon1na dc:c1sion promulgated or issued in which the convicted person
participated becomes Dull and void.
Subd. 7. AdviRorv Qpinions.
(a) The City Attomey may isauo and publi&h advisory opimom on tile requiremenIs
of this seCti011 bucct UPOU real or hypothetical situatloDl. An applicatioo for an
advisory opinion may be made omy by an individual or association who wisbes to
use the opinion to guide the iDdiviclual's or the association's own conduct. The
City AUomey will issue written opinions on all questions submitted. to himJber
witbin tbirty (30) days after receipt of writteu application, unless an iDdlvicfua1 or
association agrees to aread the lime bmit.
(b) A written advismy opinion issuccl by the City Aaomey in any subsequent
Pf~iDg CODcenIins the person making or coverecl by tbe request and is a
defeme in a judicial plOC~tDg that involves the 8\lbject matter of the opinion and
is brought apiDSt the perlon mlldng or covered by the request UDlcss:
(1) The City Attomcy has amended or revolced the opinion before the
initiation of the board or judicial proceedinJ. has DOtified dJe person
111'~ir1g or COvered. by the request of its action, and has allowed at Jeut
thirty (30) days for the penon to do anything that might be necessary to
comply with rbe uneuded or revoked opiniou;
(2) tbD request has omitted or nusatated material facts; or .
(3) tile penon makU2a or covered. by tbc request bas DOt acted in lood faith
in re1iauee 011 the opiDion.
(e) A request tor an opimon and the opinion itlelf arc nonpubJic data. 'Ibe CIty
Attomey; however may publish an opinion or a summary of an opinion, but may
DOt ineJude in the publication the name of the requester, the DImC of a persOIl
covered by a request from an agency or politlcal subdivision. or any other
mtormation &bat DUJht ideDlify the requester unless the perscm COIIJents to rho
muaion.
SubcJ. 8. A VioJatian of this cl1aptet is . Gross Misdemeanor punishable by a fiDe of up
ro three tbousaDd dollars ($3,000.00) or up to ODe (1) year in jail.
Sabd 9. This ord1",nce wW be in fUll force lLIId effect from and after is passage and
publication according to law.
4
.
1214/03/99
1213:1217
MAGN.lSCN L.ALJ FIRM ~ 43a3l31219
NO. 12115 ~12I6
. Adopted by tile City Council of the City of Stillwater this _ day of
, 1999.
.
.
Jay L. Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST:
Morli Weldon., Clerk
,
.
,
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and Council
FR:
City Coordinator
RE:
Dock permit - S1. Croix Boat
and Packet Co.
DA:
April 2, 1999
Discussion:
Accompanying this memo is the proposed dock permi.t for S1. Croix Boat and Packet
Company (Le., Andiamo) for 1999. The permit is basically the same as last year and
would allow 4 charter/excursion vessels (and additional service vessels). The fees for
1998 were $1000 per unit (6 units). I am recommending a minimum increase of $100 per
unit for a total of $6600.00.
Recommendation:
Council adopt resolution approving 1999 dock permit for St. Croix Boat and Packet
Company.
-
~~
.
,
~illwate~
TN;;"T""" " ."".~
.
DOCK PERMIT
Pursuant to Chapter 48 11 of the Stillwater City Code, the Stillwater City Council (City)
hereby grants to the S1. Croix Boat and Packet Company (Company) a Dock Permit upon
the folloWIng terms and conditions:
1. LOCATION
The Dock shall be located in the S1. CroIX RIver approximately 150 feet south
of East Nelson Street.
2. OTHER RULES
The Company shall abide by the rules and regulatlons and permit conditions
of the Corps of Engineers of the United States Army and the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources. Any charter/excursion vessels carrying
passengers for hire and using docks must abide by applicable U.S. Coast
Guard regulations.
.
3. NO GAS PUMPS
No gas pump shall be located on the dock.
4. NO DISCRIMINATION
The Company shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race,
creed, national origin, sex or social status.
5. WATERFRONT REGULATIONS
The Company agrees to abide by all rules and regulations and restrictions set
forth in Chapter 48.11 of the Stillwater City Code relative to the waterfront.
6 SCHEDULE OF FEES
Upon request of the City, the Company shall submit a schedule offees
charged for the general and transient boat docking
.
CITY HAll 216 NORTH FOURTH STillWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 PHONE 651-430-8800
"
,
7. INSURANCE
.
The Company shall provide the City with Certificate of Insurance evidencing
One MillionfI'hree Million General Liability Coverage of their operation,
naming the City as an additional insured under the policies as their interest
may appear.
8. PUMP OUT PRIVILEGES
The Company shall provide pump-out privileges for marine heads for any
boater requesting this privilege at the same rate and fee charged to boats that
are moored at the dock for a fee.
9. INSPECTIONS
The City reserves the right to request inspections of heads, electrical systems
or other unsafe conditions on or about the dock or any vessel moored thereto.
10. USAGE
.
The usage of the dock facilities shall be limited to four (4) charter and/or
excursion boats, one (1) floating ticket office vessel and a service boat not
exceeding 26 feet in length. The Company must accommodate a reasonable
number of public "walk on" passengers and Company must also accommodate
a reasonable number of transient boats. In no event shall the boats or vessels
exceed the limitation specified in the permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
11. PERMIT FEE
The annual permit fee shall be $1100 each for the Andiamo (a 115 passenger
sidewheeler), Andiamo Showboat (a 150 passenger rear wheeler), Majestic
Lady (a 150 passenger rear wheeler), Empress (a 250 passenger rear wheeler),
a floating ticket office vessel and the transient boat docks for a total of
$6600.00. The permit shall also allow a 26 foot service boat and a new dock
to moor the Empress.
12. TRANSIENT BOATS
Transient boats shall be defined as vessels that use the dock as a stop-over
privilege on a trip that does not originate from the dock. Transient boats shall
be allowed to dock up to 24 hours only per stay. "Bareboat" charter vessels
shall be considered transient boats if the origination of the trip, including
loading of passengers, takes place elsewhere.
.
~
,
13. PARKING
The City reserves the right to request the Company's assIstance in assuring
that patrons and guests of the Company will park in a designated municipal
parking lot.
.
14 FIRES
No person shall build a fire m any area of the docking premises or in any
vessel moored at the dock.
15. OBSTRUCTIONS
The City does not by this permit accept any responsibility for dredging the
dock area or making the docking area :free from obstructions or other hazards
to navigation.
16 STORAGE
The City is in no way responsible for storage of the docks during off season
and the Company agrees to abide by any decision of the City with regard to
storage.
17. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
.
The City reserves the right to add to or amend these rules when needed to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the City.
18. DURATION
The duration of this permit shall be from January 1, 1999 through December
31, 1999.
19. RIGHT OF ENTRY
The Company agrees to grant the City a right of entry upon any portion of the
City property upon which the Company has constructed tenant owned
improvements for the purposes of constructing Phase II and Phase III of the
Stillwater Levy Wall project during the year 1999, subject to reimbursement
to Company of any expenses associated with moving tenant owned
improvements that are lawfully due to Company under the Federal Relocation
Standards Act.
.
,
20. TERMINATION
.
This permit may be terminated by the City at anytime it is deemed necessary
for the protection of the public safety, health or welfare or for a violation of
any of the conditions of this permit.
Dated this
day of
. 1999.
FOR THE CITY OF STILL WATER:
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
.
.
,
RESOLUTION NO.
.
GRANTING DOCK PERMIT
TO ST. CROIX BOAT AND PACKET COMPANY
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, hereby grants a dock
permit (attached as Exhibit nAil) to the St. Croix Boat and Packet Company for the period
January 1, 1999, through December 31, 199.
Adopted by Council this 6th day of April, 1999.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
.
, I
.
.
\
,
.
Memorandum
Apnl2, 1999
TO:
Mayor and CIty Counctl
FROM:
Klayton HEckles /'
CIty Engineer Lti"
SUBJECT:
Proposal for McKuSICk Lake Downstream Conveyance System Study
DISCUSSION:
.
Attached IS a proposal from BRA for the completion of a study of the McKuSICk
Lake Downstream Conveyance System. The system m questIon IS a ravme and pIpe
system that takes water from McKusick Lake to the nver. ThIs system in ItS existmg
condItIon has a number of substandard desIgn features. WIth the proposed mitIgation
plan for Browns Creek, even more water will flow through thts system, but more
Importantly, It Will flow for longer penods. This could lead to some serious problems In
our downstream system unless it upgraded. Therefore, a study ofthts system is needed.
The study by Bonestroo would Include topographtc mapping of the entIre area,
analYSIS of the eXIstmg system, evaluatIon of system improvement alternatIves, cost
estImate and final report. The cost ofthts study is esttmated at $37,900, with a
completIon date of November 30, 1999.
In addItIon to the study results, this study Will give us topographic mformation for
the entire core area of the CIty. ThIs coupled With topographic data we have gathered In
the Market Place area and m/around the annexation area, gives us approxImately 2/3 of
the CIty completely mapped Topographic InformatIon is extremely useful to the CIty
and Will find other uses for thts data The study also allows us to answer many of the
"nagging" questIons that we have regarding this patchwork storm sewer system we have
from McKuSICk Lake to the nver
RECOMMENDATION:
GIven that the dIversIOn project is a Vltallmk in the Trout Stream MitIgatIon Plan
and that the diverSIon of water from McKusick Lake to the St. Croix River could have
. negatIve Impacts on the downtown area, staff recommends that Council authorize the
completion ofthts study. All of the costs for this study may be attributed to the
annexatIon area Trout Stream ProtectIon Plan.
ACTION REOUlRED:
If Counctl concurs With the staff recommendatIon, they should pass a motIon
adoptmg Resolution No. 99--, ACCEPTING SCOPE OF WORK FROM
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES FOR THE MCKUSICK
LAKE DOWNSTREAM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM STUDY and dIrect staff to
execute an agreement With Bonestroo, Rosene Anderlik and AsSOCIates for the
completIon of this study.
,
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
ACCEPTING SCOPE OF WORK FROM BONESTROO, ROSE , ANDERLIK &
ASSOCIATES FOR THE MCKUSICK LAKE DOWNS REAM
CONVEYANCE SYSTEM STUDY
BE IT RESOLVED by the CIty Counctl of Stillwater, Mmnesota, that pro osal Bonestroo,
Rosene, Anderltk & AssocIates to complete the McKusICk lake Downstre Conveyance System
Study, IS hereby accepted,
Adopted by Counctl thts 6th day of Apn11999.
Jay Kimble, M or
ATTEST
Morli Weldon, CIty Clerk
McKusick Lake Downstream Conveyance System Study
Scope of Work
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates
March, 1999
.
Background
McKuSICk Lake IS one of the resources that will be affected by the implementatIOn of the
AUAR MitIgation Plan for the CIty of Stillwater's annexation area The cornerstone of
the mItigation plan is the dIverSIOn of stormwater flowing from Long Lake and other
portions of the annexatIon area away from Brown's Creek and through McKusick Lake
to the 8t CroIx River. The McKusICk Lake Task Force was formed by the Sttllwater
CIty Counctl to evaluate the potential Impacts of the dIversion on McKusick Lake and
outlIne a strategy to protect the lake and it's recreational qualities One issue identIfied
by the task force was the effect of the dIversion on the conveyance system between
McKusick Lake and the 8t Croix River.
Water dIscharged through the outlet in the southeast corner of McKusick Lake must
travel almost a mile through a combmatIon of pipe and open channels before it is
discharged to the St. CrOIX River (FIgure 1) At present, a little less than half the length
of the conveyance system IS enclosed in pipe Most of the open channel is located in the
ravine between McKuSICk Lake and City Hall. Even under existing conditions, portions
of the open channel ravme and channel are moderately to severely eroded The majority
of thts erosion appears caused by dIscharge of runoff from residential neIghborhoods mto .
the ravine containing the channel (FIgure 2) Local floodmg problems m the pIpe system
that traverses the downtown area have also been reported.
The dIverSIOn of additional flow through McKusick Lake as recommended in the AUAR
Will mcrease the watershed of the lake from about 1,000 acres to over 4,200 acres The
additIonal runoff generated by the larger watershed means that the conveyance system
below McKusick Lake Will carry a greater volume of flow and experience higher peak
flows on a more frequent basis than It has in the past. Further, the McKusick Lake Task
Force supports an increase m the capacity of the outlet from McKusick Lake to minimize
water level fluctuations in the lake in response to storm events Under either scenario,
the potential for erosion and floodmg in the conveyance system below McKusick Lake
will increase if no improvements are made to this system.
Scope of Work
To address these issues, a strategy for improving the downstream conveyance system will
be developed. This strategy will involve the following tasks:
1 TODOf!1'aphlC Mappmg
Good quality topographic maps (two foot contours) are not available for this
sectIon of the City. As an early step in this project, a topographic map would be .
1
.
.
.
generated to factlitate evaluation of the current system and development of
options for system improvements. BRA has received quotations for this work
from three reputable contractors to expand 2 foot topographic map coverage of
the CIty to provide the information needed for this assessment.
Estimated Cost:
$11,000 (includes cost of flIght, provision of control points,
and generation of electronic files and hard copies of the
map information by the contractor)
2 System Analvsls
BRA Will develop a computer model of the downstream conveyance system from
McKusick Lake to the St Croix River. This model Will be lInked with the model
already developed for the McKusick Lake system to analyze the Impact of routmg
different size runoff events through the lake to the St. Croix River with different
lake outlet configurations We will also analyze the eXIstmg storm sewer system
between Mulberry and Myrtle Street in downtown Stillwater, since these portions
of the system could be impacted by options for system improvements. Modeling
will allow us to IdentIfy the location of potential problem areas in the existing
system under the new flow regime and quantItatIvely evaluate the degree to which
changes m the system Will resolve those problems The cost estimate for thts task
assumes one meeting with City staff
Estimated Cost.
$12,400
3 Evaluation of Svstem Improvement Alternatives
After completmg the system analysis, we will identify and evaluate conceptual
alternatives for system improvements necessary to accommodate the increased
flows resulting from the dIversion required in the AUAR The evaluation will
consider the following factors
. Effectiveness at preventing downstream flooding and erosion.
. Discharge from other facilIties to existing ravine and pipe.
. Cost.
. Compatibility with other CIty management objectives (trails improvements,
management ofMcKusick Lake levels, etc.).
. Social acceptability
. Environmental impact.
As part of this task, we will hold a public information meeting to receive input.
From the information gathered, we will work with City staff to select the best
alternative to provide detailed construction costs. The cost estimate for this task
assumes two meetings with City staff.
Estimated Cost:
$8,500
2
4
FeaSlbllztv-Level Design and Cost Estlmate/Fmal Report
Based on the results of Task 3, a feasIbility-level design and cost estimate will be
prepared for presentation to the City Council The fmal report will include:
· Introduction including key fmdmgs
· Modeling results and construction considerattons
· Summary of the alternatives, including cost estimates and
advantages/disadvantages
· Recommended alternative, including feasibilIty-level design and cost estimate
· Map showmg the proJect area and the locatIon of the proposed improvements
The cost estimate for this task assumes two meetings with City staff Five copies
of the draft report and 20 copies of the final report Will be provided to the CIty.
Estimated Cost
$6,000
Total Estimated Project Cost:
$37,900
Completion Date:
November 30,1999
3
.
.
.
F. j ~""c. .1
.
cl
"Z
. ~ ~
:'t; <:> ~
.
~..i
~~i
o
~
-
c -
3 8
- ~
\\
-
-
-
o I
~ g
\J)
o
~
"A
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
- \j\
~~
~~~
Figure 2
.
1
.
~- .j-
.
i
I
I
~
\
{I
...-
2 The conveyance channel in the ravine just downstream of
McKusick Lake outlet shows minor erosion
.
.
FIgure 1. (con't)
.
.
4. Gully erosion in lateral ravine caused by discharge of storm water
from N. Harriet Street/Cherry St intersection.
Figure 2 (con't)
.
5. The conveyance channel in the main ravine below Everet 8t.
shows moderate to severe erosion.
.
6. The conveyance system from McKusick Lake carries discharge through
an open flume between No. 2nd St and No. Main St
.
.
.
.
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Shawn Sanders
CIVtl Engmeer
SUBJECT: 1999 Street Improvements
Project 9902
DISCUSSION:
Plans and specifications for the 1999 Street Improvements are near completton. The bId date ,
Will be Apn129, 1999 at 10:00 a.m., With bids presented to CouncIl at the May 4, 1999 meetIng.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that Counctl approve the plans and specIficattons for the 1999 Street
Improvements and order advertisement for bids for the proJect.
ACTION REOUlRED:
If Counctl concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motIon adopting Resolution
No 99--, APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR 1999 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (project 9902)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS FOR 1999 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
(project 9902)
.
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on March 2, 1999, the CIty Engmeer
has prepared plans and speCIficatIons for the making of 1999 street Improvements on of FIfth, SIXth,
and Seventh Street between Wtllard and Hancock, and
WHEREAS, the CIty Engineer has presented plans and specifications for both improvements to the
Council for approval and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specIficatIOns presented by the CIty Engmeer are hereby approved.
2 That the above descnbed proJects be combmed and bId as one proJect for bIddmg purposes.
3. The CIty Clerk IS ordered to prepare and cause to be mserted in The Gazette and In the
Construction Bulletm an advertisement for bids upon the making of the Improvement under
the approved plans and speCIficatIOns. The advertIsement shall be published once In the
Stillwater Gazette and twice In the Construction Bulletin, shall SpecIfy the work to be done, .
shall state that bIds WIll be received by the CIty Clerk untIl Thursday, Apn129, 1999 at 10:00
a m at whtch time they will be pubhcly opened at City Hall by the CIty Engmeer; will then
be tabulated and Will be consIdered by the Counctl at their next regular Council meeting on
May 4, 1999, m the Council Chambers Any bIdder whose responsibility is questIoned
dunng conSIderatIon of the bid will be given an opportunIty to address the CouncIl on the
Issue ofresponSIbIhty. No bIds Will be consIdered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and
accompanted by a cash depOSIt, cashter's check, bId bond or certIfied check payable to the
Clerk for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid.
Adopted by CouncIl thts 6th day of Apn11999.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST.
Morli Weldon, CIty Clerk
.
.
.
.
MemorandJmJ
Apnl 2, 1999
TO: Mayor and CIty Council
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles
City Engmeer
11-$/
SUBJECT: Market Place Surface Water Management Study
DISCUSSION:
Recently, BRA completed a study of the 6200 Street area. As part of that study,
they Identified the need for a large storm water holding pond, as well as a storm water
pipe from that pond to Long Lake. The study suggested there may be significant cost
savmgs and water quality benefits that may result if improvements were done upstream in
the Stillwater Industnal Park.
The entire industrtal park system has been pieced together over the past 20 years
and no comprehensive plan for the entire system has ever been completed. Engmeering
staffhas often struggled with site review on indiVldual developments because the entire
system is poorly understood and does not appear meet water quality or quantity
management standards of today. For these reasons, the City Counctl authorized a study
of the mdustrial park storm water system that we have called the Market Place Surface
Water Management Study.
The completion of this study now gives us better insIght into how our system
works, where it IS deficient, what Impacts water from Oak Park Hetghts, Mn/DOT and
County Road 5 have on the system, and it provides recommendations for improving that
system. The study looked at two basiC storm water perimeters, namely water quantity
management and water quality management. From a water quantity aspect we would
measure success based on whether or not our system minimi7.es the chance of flooding,
minimizesthe possibihty of erosion and sedunentation and high water levels in Long
Lake. In terms of water quality, success is generally measured in terms of how much
phosphorous IS removed from the storm water discharges. The generally recogmzed
minimum phosphorous removal rate is 60 percent. The upper limIt of phosphorous
removal IS 70-75 percent. Anything over 70 percent can be very difficult to obtam,
espeCIally when retrofitting a system.
Two facts immediately came out of the study. The existing overall system
currently has a removal rate of 61 %. Therefore, our existmg system is above the
mmImum standards. GIven the fact that the CIty has IdentIfied Long Lake as a resource
worthy of higher order protectIon we may wish to consIder the methods and relatIve costs .
of mcreasmg the removal efficIencies. The second fact IS that Oak Park HeIghts
contnbutes a large amount of water to our system, but the water that IS contributed is
managed effectIvely Although Oak Park HeIghts contnbutes over 1/3 of the total
dramage area, It restricts the flow of water to the point that less than 20% of the overall
flow rate reaching the 62nd Street pond currently comes from Oak Park Heights. In
additIon, the water commg from Oak Park Hetghts has been treated to a point where 68%
of the phosphorous has been removed from the water. These facts mdIcate that although
Oak Park HeIghts is responsible for some of the problems WIthm our system, the level of
partICIpation m any corrective or mttigative steps may be less than what we may have
anticIpated.
The report shows that the CIty has some fleXIbility m the level of lDlprovement
added to the system. It appears that there are four major improvements, as well as some
mmor ones that can be lDlplemented. Each improvement can be built upon the next, and
each has a correspondmg lDlprovement m water management. Each of these
Improvements are discussed below:
62nd Street Pond and Pipe System
This Improvement was discussed under the 62nd Street Plan and is the most important part
of any Improvement concept. It greatly reduces sedimentatIon and eroSIon occurrmg near
and mto Long Lake provides some benefit in Long Lake level control, provides a source .
ofmatenal for the construction of the Curve Crest ExtensIon and increases the
phosphorous removal rate from 61% to 66%. The cost of these Improvements has been
estImated at $546,000.
Tower Drive & Market Dnve Ponds
Further Improvement to the system could be gained by ImproVIng the pond at Tower
Dnve and Market Drive ponds. ThIs will reduce the peak discharge into Long Lake from
197 CFS to 143 CFS. This IS important as it reduces the amount overland flow (the pipe
would take most of It) that IS a potential eroSIon and mamtenance problem. These
Improvements would increase phosphorous removal from 66% to 67%. The cost of these
Improvements is esttmated at $125,000.
Washmgton AvenuelHtghway 36 Pond
Another level of Improvement could be made by significantly enlarging the Washmgton
Avenue/Highway 36 pond located m front of the Anderson Wmdows building The
construction of thts pond would ehminate any overland flow out of the 62nd Street pond
In a 1 DO-year storm event. This would mean that all the water from a 100-y.ear storm _
would stay Within the pIpe system and would eliminate all maIntenance and VIrtually all
erOSIon potential. ThIs optIon also increases phosphorous removal from 67% to 69%. It
also has some benefits to any Long Lake level management plan in that It provides .
.
additional flexibility. The cost of this option IS difficult to estimate due to the need to
acqwre easements, but assuming the property owners are somewhat cooperative, the cost
to construct thIs improvement and acquire easements is estimated at $325,000.
Minor Improvements
The above major improvements are hsted m order of precedence and relative ease
of construction. Some additional mmor improvements may be needed Within the
watershed. There are a number of pond outlets that should be modified to better control
the rate whtch water discharges from the ponds. Also, there is one home on the
WIldwood Pmes pond that appears to be at, or below, the 100 year flood elevation. At a
mmimum the CIty should notify thts resident of thts situatIon. The cost of these minor
pond improvements would cost approXImately $50,000.
Highlands Diversion
One other optIon that report discusses is the pOSSIbility of diverting a large
amount of the flow from the Highlands into the clinic site pond. Also, the clinic site
pond would have to be enlarged. This optIon would increase phosphorous removal from
69% to 70% and the peak: discharge down to 125 CFS. However, the cost for this project
would be SIgnificant. The amount IS unknown at this time, but due to easements, and site
constramts It could be over $500,000. Due to the limited benefits, It is recommended that
Council give this optIon no further consideration.
.
To complete all of the above referenced improvements the cost would be
approximately $1,046,000.
Project CFS PllO"plwrous Rel1lo\ al Rdte Cost
62 I Street Pond Storm Sewer 197 66% $546,000
Tower Drive & Market Drive 143 67% $125,000
Ponds
Washington Avenue & Highway 131 69% $325,000
36 Pond
Mmor Improvements N/A N/A $50,000
TOTAL $1,046,000
n
.
The total cost of these Improvements is over $1 million. At the present tIme, we
do not have any funding source for these expenses. However, If development is to occur
along the Curve Crest extension (Le. the Nolde and Bradshaw developments) it will be
necessary to construct the 62nd Street pond and some of the pipe.improvements: .--...
unmedtately The cost to construct These initial pond improvements to accommodate:the _
Curve Crest extension is apprOXImately $301,000.' Therefore, the CIty needs to . .
detemune an nnmediate fundmg source for the pond expansion. improvements as welt as
determine the level of future improvements and method of financing these improvements.
There are a large number of possible contributors to the inItIal and future projects. .
PossIble funding sources include assessments to the overall drainage area, cost sharing
With Oak Park Heights, Washington County and Mn/DOT, contributions from State Aid,
in-kInd developer improvements, TIF, and Storm Water UtIhty. Assessments are the
most obvious source of mcome. For the Stillwater area, the southern dtstrict IS
predominated by commercIal development while the northern distnct IS dominated by
reSIdential development. Also, the southern district has the bulk of the improvements,
some of which directly benefit the south distnct, whereas the north district would only
benefit from the 62nd Street pond and accompanymg storm water pipe. As a startIng
point Council may wish to consider an assessment at the standard rate of $0.045 per
square foot for the south distnct. The northern district, whtch has lower development
intensity and lower benefit from the proJect, could be assessed at $0.02 per square foot.
Using such a rational, the southern dtstrict would contribute $376,000 and the northern
dIStriCt $191,000.
Cost sharing was also listed as an alternatIve. Oak Park Heights IS the obvious
source of cost sharing given theIr large contribution. As mentioned, Oak Park Heights
Isover 1/3 of the total area, but since Oak Park Heights has its own system in place that
pretreats the water and linuts the discharge rate it may be more appropriate if Oak Park
HeIghts contributes based on contnbutIng flow rate as opposed to area. Using this
ratIonal and if the CIty opted to make all of the proposed improvements, Oak Park
Heights would have a maxnnum of $100,000 - $110,000. This assumes that Oak Park
Heights would only contribute to the 62nd Street pond and its discharge pipe. The same .
ratIonal was used for the Mn/DOT property. The maximum expected cost sharing with
Mn/DOT would be $32,000. Depending on the methodology for the County, the County
share would be between $16,000-$49,000.
MSA participation was also listed as an option. There are approXlmately 15 acres
ofMSA street right-of-way withm the project area. Taking the 15 acres as a percentage
of the total 836 acres YIelds a MSA cost sharing of $19,000.
In-kind developer contnbution could also be a funding option. The engineer for
the proposed Nolde development has indicated that the site is short of good material. The
proposed Tower Drive pond excavation will likely yield extra material suitable for
construction purposes. Therefore, It may be possible to provide the developer with a
location to obtain free material that could complete some of the work. Also, there is
undeveloped site near the Tower Drive pond that Will be required to provide storm. water
qUalIty and quantity ponding. As an alternative, the developer of this site may wish to
contnbute to the development of the Tower Dnve pond to increase the developable land
on the developer's site. The likely maximum m-kind developer contribution is esttmated
at $70,000.
Below is summary of the maximum estimated revenues from the VariOUS .funding
sources.
.
.
.
.
South DIStnct ($0.045) $376,000
North DIStnct ($0.02) $191,000
Oak Park Heights $100,000
Mn/DOT $32,000
County $49,000
MSA $19,000
Developer ContnbutIon $70,000
TOTAL $837,000
Based on these estimates It IS clear that there will be a shortfall of over $200,000
The only other possIble fundmg sources listed are TIF and Storm Water UtIlity.
Currently, accordmg to the Finance Director, the TIF available for thIs area IS zero.
Much, or all, of the TIF has been used for the recent development of the sports complex.
The storm water utility is a viable source, but it is dedicated to a number of other
proJects, including Ltly Lake. These sources would only be needed upon completion of
the final phases of the proJects listed that may not occur for some ttme. Of immediate
concern however, is the funding of the 62nd Street pond.
The contnbutors outside the City, including Oak park Heights, Mn/DOT and the
County, would all be contributing to the construction of the 62nd Street pond and storm
water pipe system. These are the initIal portions of the proJect that must be constructed;
therefore, It may be necessary to pursue these items immediately. Council may wish to
direct staff proceed with meetings With the VarIOUS organIZations to discuss this project.
In addition, the CIty may Wish to contact Brown's Creek Watershed DIstrict to solicit
theIr support.
GIven the strong deSIre of the developers in the 62nd Street area to proceed with
their developments and the requirement that the 62nd Street pond be constructed prior to,
or as part of the street construction in this area, it is of great importance that the CIty
develop a fundmg strategy immediately.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council reVIew the attached report and the information in
this memo and determine what level of water management the City would ultimately
provide for the Market Place and Long Lake area. In additIon, Counctl should give
guidance on the funding methodology for the projects that should be done in the
immedIate future.
ACTION REOUlRED:
Counctl should pass a motion adoptIng ResolutIon No. 99--, ACCEPTING'
THE MARKET PLACE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY, and pass a
motIon gIvmg staff direction on a recommended funding alternative for the construction
of the 62nd Street pond.
...
~
.
.
.
Memorandum
AprilS, 1999
TO: Mayor and CIty Counctl
FROM:
Klayton H. Eckles ~ ("
CIty Engtneer
SUBJECT: Fundmg Request for Brown's Creek Stream RealIgnment
DISCUSSION:
Attached IS a letter from Geoffrey Gnffin of the Department of Natural Resources. The DNR
has receIved a $300,000 grant to reahgn Brown's Creek. The reahgnment proposed is stmllar to one
of the ahgnments that we have studIed in the feasibIhty report for the Trout Stream MitigatIon Plan.
Part of the CIty'S plan Will reqUIre relocatIon of the creek. For thts reason staffhas been supporttve
of the DNR and theIr efforts to complete this portion of the proJect. With the DNR completing this
portIon of the project, the CIty receives direct and mdIrect benefits. Essentially whatever work the
DNR completes IS work that the CIty Will no longer need to complete as part of its Trout Stream
MItIgatIon Plan.
As shown m the letter and cost estImate, the cost is approximately $400,000, but the DNR
only has $300,000 allotted The DNR Will not be able to complete this proJect unless another
fundmg source IS found. Smce all the work completed by the DNR is work that the CIty would have
to complete anyway, it would be htghly advisable for the CIty to contnbute to this project finanCIally
to msure ItS success At thts tIme, the DNR is requesting that the City make a financial COmmitment
to the project Our commitment would be all costs over the $300,000 grant by the DNR.
The CIty should be receiving a number of contnbutions to the Trout Stream MitIgation
Project through developer contributions The Trailhead Development, known as Creekside
Crossing, Will be contnbuttng between $50,000-$65,000 and the Bergmann townhouse development
will also be contributing over $100,000. In addition, possible contributions m the next six months
include the Nolde, Bradshaw, LIberty - Phase II, and Legends - Phase II. These developer
contnbutIons should yield sufficient funds to support the DNR's project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council supports the DNR stream realignment proJect, both
techmcally and financially and that thts issue IS gIven to the CIty Attorney for review and
development of an acceptable agreement, If necessary.
ACTION REOUlRED:
If Counctl concurs with the staff recommendation, Counctl should pass a motIon adoptIng
ResolutIon No. 99--, RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF CITY
TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR THE DNR BROWN'S CREEK STREAM
REALIGNMENT PROJECT, and direct the CIty Attorney to begin preparatIon of necessary
documentation and agreements
,.
I.,
.
.
2
.
-
..
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF CITY TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL
SUPPORT FOR THE DNR BROWN'S CREEK STREAM REALIGNMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the CIty of StIllwater's Trout MItigatton Plan includes the realIgnment of Brown's
Creek, and
WHEREAS, the CIty of StIllwater has been working With the Mmnesota Department of Natural
Resources on the Trout Stream MItIgation Project; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Legislature has allotted to the DNR $300,000 towards this project;
and
WHEREAS, the DNR will construct thIs portion of the Trout MitigatIon Project if an additIonal
fundmg source IS found, and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the CIty CouncIl of the CIty of Stillwater that the
CIty supports the concept, techmcal and financial of the DNR's Brown's Creek Stream RealIgnment
ProJ ect
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of StIllwater Will provide the fundmg of
approximately $100,000 to complete this proJect.
Adopted by the CIty CouncIl of the CIty of Stillwater this 6th day of April, 1999.
Jay Kimble, Mayor
ATTEST.
Morh Weldon, CIty Clerk
3
..
't
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
.
500 Lafayette Road
St Paul, Mmnesota 55155-40-29
March 26, 1999
Mr Klayton Eckles, City Engineer
City Hall
216 North 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re Brown's Creek Stream Realignment
Washington County
File No.: FMA00599. 00. 00. 01/F-99-10
Dear Mr. Eckles
Enclosed is a cost estimate for the above mentioned project The legislature has allotted $300,000
towards this project As we discussed on March 18, 1999, we would like you to allocate your storm
water development fees to help make up the addItional $100,000
.
Please let us know your decision as soon as possible because our $300,000 expires June 30, 1999. We
will be forwarding a preliminary plan and specification to your office for review within the next two
weeks
Please feel free to call me at (651) 296-0113 if you have questions or need additional information
Sincerely,
~A/J
Geoffiey G Griffin, PE, LS
c Jason Moeckel, Region 6 Fisheries
Dirk Peterson, Fisheries Program Manager
Duane Shodeen, Regional Fisheries Manager
.
DNR InformatIOn 612-296-6157, 1-800-766-6000 . TrY 612-296-5484, 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Value\ D,veroJly
ft Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
~4J MinImum of 10% PO\t-Coru.umer Wa~te
*tt;\t~ . i + .\:tt .,:fl' ;:+:: t+'
:.-1. ... ....... -to: ........,..-..... +
...,.
Brown's Creek Stream Realignment
FMA00599.00.00.01/F-99-10
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
o Ilzation
Excavation
Class I Rt ra
Native Revetment
Sanlta Sewer Crossin
30" HOPE
Rock Weirs
Golf Course Channel Crossin
Soddin
To sOil Ferbllze Seed and Mulch
16300
2668
2250
15
450
24
1
7500
3
C.Y
CY
LF
Each
LF.
Each
Each
SY
Acre
$450
$30 00
$40.00
$5 000 00
$70 00
$400 00
$1000000
$300
$1 500 00
.
.
$73,350 00
$80 040 00
$90 000 00
$75 000 00
$31 500 00
$9 600 00
$1000000
$22 500 00
$4 500 00
.
.
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO Mayor and Council
FR. City Coordinator
RE Stillwater Yacht Club-request to purchase
City owned property
DA. April 2, 1999
Discussion:
CouncIl previously authorized staff to begm the process related to the sale of city owned
park land to the Stillwater Yacht Club (see attached minutes of meeting of December 8,
1998). However, the process was never started because of what was seen as a change in
the conditions related to the issue that caused the request to be made by the Yacht Club to
purchase the land. The City has received the attached letter from Counsel for the
StIllwater Yacht Club requesting that the City move forward on the process. I give this to
you now for your confirmation to go forward with the process.
Recommendation;
Council confirm its intent to begin process foir possible sale of land to Stillwater Yacht
Club.
/}f~
.
FIEDLER LAW OFFICE, P.A.
Julianne M. Fiedler
Attorney at Law
.
1313 Fifth Street S E . Suite 326
MinneapolIs, M,nnesota 55414
Telephone (612) 379-3616
POBox 131896
Rosevdle. Minnesota 55113
Fax (612) 379-3617
.
March 16, 1999
David T. Magnuson, Esq.
Sttllwater City Attorney
Magnuson Law Firm
333 North Main Street, Suite 202
Stillwater, MN 55082
~1AR 1 8 .d99
Re: lV.urana Development, Inc. - Mulberry Point Parcel Purchase
My File No: MOR 1908
Dear Mr. Magnuson:
I have recently spoken with my client, and have confrrmed that it is stIll our firm intent to
proceed forward with the purchase of the Mulberry Point Parcel as discussed at the December
8, 1998 Special Meeting of the City Council.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 16.01 of the City Charter, I am hereby requesting that the .
City commence the process for the sale of the City's property to Sttllwater Yacht Club by setting
a formal date for public hearing and proceeding with preparing a revised Lowell Park plan.
As was discussed at length at the December 8 meeting, I do not think that it is at all possible
or plausible to resolve all issues between the parties in the underlying declaratory judgment and
condemnation action as consideration for or in exchange for purchase of the parcel Rather, my
client merely believes that it is in its best interest to own the parcel as the adjacent feeholder.
Please contact me should you wish to discuss this further. OtherwIse, I would respectfully
request that I be carbon copied on any documents regarding the public notice and hearing or
revisions of the park plan. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
~-?~
JMF/mme
cc.
Mr. Maurice J Wagener, Marina Development, Inc.
.
I
I I
50 ..... · '" .
,. --
'~
.
.
~
CITY OF STILLWATER
CITY COUNCIL MEETING NO. 98-30
December 8, 1998
SPECIAL MEETING
4:30 P.M.
The meetIng was called to order by Mayor Kimble.
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
Councilmembers Bealka, Cummings, Zoller and Mayor Kimble
Councilmember Thole
City Coordinator Kriesel
City Attorney Magnuson
Fire ChiefKa1lestad
City Engineer Ecktes
Community Development Director Russell
City ClerkWeldon
1. Consideration of license for fuel tank installation by Stillwater Yacht Club.
City Coordinator Kriesel reported this issue was before Council at the December 4, 1998,
meeting. At that time, Scott OlsoD, Director of Operation of the Stillwater Yacht Club, requested
permission to bury a 10,000 gallon fuel tank on City property. The Yacht Club had removed two
tanks that were located on City property and are requesting to place a 10,000 gallon tank in the
same location. The tanks were apparently placed in the ground while the property was owned by
the railroad, who in turn leased the property to the Yacht Club. The property was later purchased
by the City and leased to the Yacht Club. However, no fees have been collected during the past
two years because of high water in 1997 and the levee project work in 1998. There is no license
or agreement with the Yacht Club for the installation of the new tank on City property.
.
City Attorney Magnuson reported he has prepared a license agreement for consideration. It
would take care of the liability and indemnification, and hold harmless issues if the Council
agrees to allow placement of the tank on city property.
City Coordinator Kriesel also stated another option would be to sell the property to the Yacht
Club. This might resolve future property ownership issues and protect the City further if an
environmental problem develops because of the tank. A sale would require a lengthy
notification and hearing process (approximately 60-90 days) as required by Article 16.01 of the
City Charter.
City Attorney Magnuson stated the City is embroiled in litigation with the Stillwater Yacht Club.
The Club is claiming vested rights in the property. The City's position is that there are no vested
rights. Vested interests do not accrue under a lease.
. '
Julieanne Fiedler, counsel for Stillwater Y~ht Club, stated there were more global issues '.'- .,
involved in the litigation. They believe they have an easement across the parcel. They are ready ~ -"
to move forward on the purchase of the property. She also stated the purchase will not eliminate
litigation related to Lowell Park, the gas dock, boat launch, riparian rights, and the economic
effect on the Yacht Club. She stated she was not in a position to state the litigation would be
dropped if the property was sold to the Yacht Club.
..
-- - - "-. .~".--;..,
...... .. ..",.L~ ........ ~"fl:~~.... ..
- -':;- 0;. - ~?"" ,
December 8, 1~?~ fr.~-.:~ i
~ ~ ~ -..
City Council Meeting 98-30
CounciImember Cummings questioned if the launch could be replaced. Councilmember Zoller .
stated he was opposed to a launch in that location and further stated he did not want to proceed
without guarantees that this would be an end to all of the issues. He questioned what benefit
there was to the City.
City Coordinator Kriesel stated the benefit would be that the business has operated at this
location for a long time and the business is a value to the community.
Fire ChiefKallestad clarified the Fire Department issues only tank removal permits. The Fire
Department does not issue installation permits.
Discussion followed related to liability issues, park design, and options for the placement of the
tank in other locations.
Karl Ranum, representing Wolf Marine, asked special favors not be granted by the City. Wolf
Marine and Sunnyside have gas docks on private land. Wolf Marine has asked no special favors,
nor operated with threats. He requested a level playing field for all.
.
Jeff Johnson, Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC), stated the HPC has been involved in the
development of Lowell Park and the use or possible sale of this property would be a strong
reversal in the park development. He stated to allow the purchase of this property would be to
go against the Charter Commission intent and City plans for the park. He suggested the marina
should come to the City, drop the lawsuit, or buy property across the tracks.
.
Motion by CounciImember Cummings, seconded by Councilmember Bealka directing staff to begin the
process for the sale of City property to the Stillwater Yacht Club, set the public hearing, and further
direct staff to prepare the park plan. 3-1 (Zoller nay, Thole absent)
City Coordinator Kriesel noted the new tank is on site. If it becomes a public safety issue, the
Yacht Club is on notice the City will need to take action. Fire ChiefKallestad stated the tank
must be secured from rolling and the hole should be filled in.
Ms. Fiedler stated the hole will be filled.
Scott Olson, manager of the Stillwater Yacht Club, asked if the City would approve the
installation on Yacht Club property 1100 feet to the north. Fire ChiefKallestad stated he would
need to check the site.
2. Consideration of Fire Relief Association pension plan approval.
.
City Coordinator Kriesel presented the request of the Stillwater Fire Relief Association for City
approval of their pension increase. The increase would go from $2800 per year of service to .
$3250 per year of service for 1998 and $3500 for 1999 He had previously believed the City's
...
approval was not necessary. However, the State Auditor's Office concurs with the Association
that City approval is necessary because the pension levels exceed an amount that would not .~.".." :.
require City approval. This higher level does give liability to the City. Mr. Kriesel state~ ~~.~.:~~r=-.'
....... 0<1_ 't:.,.:!......!~'....'}.""
, ..~ ,~~
_.. ,. ,,~..( ...l'.......l,
..~ ~~-:.~J,.: l-r.,.. if..%. .
.,! . ...
- <. 'k-"
ifI,-" :....?\
2
~
. I
-l
...
10
r-
c
n 3
9 :-
...
140
)
'.
lei.
Ig
~
IA
I!
('
I _
_ :,-~6"Ci.!3~~/!!:-
;:::=...;:"'"~t"'3~iiPS;";"l7..& -
I~ oa.
t ::
IJII
I
t
I
I
"
'.
S'Ot05SRT.
JJ
'OJ
~ ftOtl5.S frt:Ha
I
-I
OI$CIn Tr F.
z
o
~
~
~
Z
4).1
:!
AVE.
~
.", ..
s:
A
-a
;;"
CJ~
c--
_.S!
""1 :s
u::p.
4
. .
~~
. !:
. ....
I ~
'I :~:z I
I~ .
.~ <:. .
.....< I
~l> I
1.:1 --t
lit rn .
m:o 1
.-- L ~
'i l'-f
~. Iii
.iJ 1:11C
.1 ri j
1 1 1
.T' -~-
- 0.
"'" -s
c.9 II
6l -
J> 0
o.
.
,
I
t!f
.,.,.
f::
;rS:f
~(D"~
.....
~
~
~
."".
Z
~
,
S"
p
G1",
. 0
-n
......
0;
.
-
-
-
(fl
,-I
1
1
r)
~
6'_
1
;;
J>
'do
I
---
-
6
rt1
~
,.-
OJ
::i
~
~
:P.
.
..
I
,
To sIrengIhen
and promote
C1I1es as centers
of oppOltIlIllty.
leadership and
govemance
.
~.~~
National League
of Cities
1301 Pennsylvania Ave . N W
Washington. 0 C 20004-1763
202~6-3O00
Fax 202~6-3043
Internet wwwnle org
1999 OffiCIIS
PresIdent
Clarence E Anthony
Mayor South Bay Ronda
First Vice President
Bob Knight
Mayor WichIta, Kansas
Second Vice President
Dennis W Archer
Mayor DetrOit Michigan
ImmedIBle Past PreSident
Bnan J 0 Neill
. Councilman PllIladelpllla
Pennsylvania
ExecutMl OIr&elrJr
Donald J Borut
/......."
~
,~/
March 19,1999
The Honomble Jay Knnble
Mayor
City of Stillwater
2164thStN
StJ.llwater, MN 55082-4807
Dear Mayor Knnble
I am wntmg to enhst your support m advocatmg the five federal pnontles set by your Board of
DrrectoIS last week at our CongresSIonal City Conference and m workmg wrth your CongresSIonal
delegatIon on bebalf of our 1999 ActIon Agenda Making Electronic Commerce Fair, Preserving
Municipal Authority, Building a New Economy, Investing in Transportation, and Protecting
MunicipalAuthority in any federal Electric Deregulotion legislation The enclosed copIes of our
five-pomt Acba1 Agenda we adopted at our jUSt-concluded Congress1onal City Confurence provIdes
deta1Is about our lughest federal pnontles for thIs :first sesSIon of the 106th Congress The feedback I
have recetved from our thousands of delegates who met wrth theIr Senators and Representatives last
week demonstrates that we can have a bIg nnpact when we speak with one VOIce on a focused set of
pnontJ.es That's why I'm askmg for your actIve parbCIpatlon m our 1999lobbymg effort Please
share tlus mfonnat1on and call for actIon wrth your councll, so that you can develop a jomt actIon
plan In addmon, the March 15th edItIon of Nation's Cztles Weekly provIdes deta1led coverage of
our actIons and the feedback we recetved from key na1lonalleaders
Wlule our lobbymg staff does an outstandIng Job of representing local mterests m WashIngton
on a daIly basIS, the VOIces of the more than 135,000 local offiCIals we represent speakIng
dIrectly to theIr elected representatIves can be espec18lly powerful I urge you to read thIs
mformabon carefully to make your VOIce heard now
It has become clear that the nature of govermneot and our mformatlon technology economy IS
rapIdly changJng tradI1J.onal notIons of the federal-stat.e-loca1 relatIonslnps CItIes are mr more
dependent upon our regIonal econonues, so that our relatIOIJShiIHmce pnmanly defined by federal
grants we used to 1IIlp1emmt na1lonal pohaes-tOOay IS defined more by federal efforts to preempt
our access to revenues and Iustonc and tradI1J.onal power and authorIty Those preemptJ.ons, from
Internet sales taxes to land use and zonmg decISIons, can have fur greater unpact on our abIhty to
balance local budgets and provIde semces to our Jomt constrtuents than ever before Consequently,
we beheve that the way we proceed m tlus transl1lonlS of the utmost lIllportance awe are to earn the
respect and trust of the taxpayers we all serve
Our most onportant federal pnorIW IS to protect and restore flurness to the nabon's Mam Street
retaIlers and to protect the state and local sales tax-WIthout question the most cnbcal smgle
source of revenue for the natIon's state and local governments Unless and untIl Congress and
the PresIdent act to ensure equIty With regard to remote sales, the escalatIng eroSIon of these
state and local revenues Will undermme any federal clauns of a comnutment to pubhc
educabon
".""."",. ..... E..... _ ()IanIkI AondI............ _ Newark NewJny.lIngaIy....... _ CoiunDls lIIII.......... CiIy CIIIIIaII'resIdIIIlIlllMr CoIIndo. ~ Am" ~
CiuI:I..... Las VegaI. Nevada .......A....-. &IaJIne IlIn!clII' Rims t.UuapaI Leap. E.......... ConmssaB' AedSpnngl. NardI CnIIna.... B. w.-. &IaJIne ilreclIr New Hampshlre MuruapaI AssllcIllI1IlI1
. Llny A. BlIkkIIl. CIIIIIaI Member Golden Valley MIIlIlIsaIlI..... T .......l'.oonCIImiIIllalan Rouge llIPSIana ....... D ........k.,.fnJ rem KansasClly Misslu1.......A. ~.... CiuI:IImemIII' lIlangIIlII
FlII8l1B 1Cllnlucty.... t:IIddI.- __ Coon:IIwanIIIIlllI:lIeslII' New Yark. JaIII P S- ~ I'llIIbac MidllglII........ CIlIIIr.AIdllIIIIan Sena\IJIIa MlsslsslPII. FnIIIl C1... Maylr IWIs IIIIIIIIIS .1111.-.
MI'/II' Omaha NIInIIra........... C4y CIIIIIaI PI8sIdeII. SllIIIIIe WasIIngIDn. rr- H.IIIIIIIIr. _ CiInIlndge MasslI:IueIIS........... CiuI:I..... ~ Cllkndo' JaIII A.llII-..IE. Emcuuve ll11eclllr
I'erI1sjtvnI LeapDfCibes lIIII ~..... II. s--. _ TIIIIIIB Anz1lna...........,. ElaIaM IlncInr Nevada LeapolCil&lIIII MlnapaldIBS...., L....... CIIIIIaI Member FartWlll1h Texas......,...
111111.._ &sI1'llIII.Gmg1a.........\Ii:8_lJIII8Ruo:t MlIIsas."""QIIIElaIaM _ MIInlI1lI.IlInIIl~MaIar SlI1IaIlllbanl ClIIIbnIa.....F.... &llcuINe1l1l1lCllll' LeagueolMlI1l1eSOlll
CItIes .11.. A........ Malar IJlewaad CallndD.-.A....... &ecubve IJaecIIlr lMmM t.UuapaI Leap............ Malar Fart LaudIdlIe AondI. '- 0g\IIIl._ Tualabn.llregIII."" Onpm CounclinendJer
long IllIad1 Caldan1a. WiIIII J I'iII. CiuI:II MemIB Msan NardI Carol...,..., C. Pall, MalarfnJ TIlII1 IlaIas Texas................. ClImII'resIdlrII. Fart WIlN 1ndIane.....,..._ ClImIIlBllber College Park
GeorgIa .......... ElaIaM IlIn!clII' AondI Leap. Cibes. _bill, _ llIIIonI AIaIaIIJ. DeIIIIlIII. s,e. MI'/II' I'uIalIa T_. c....,.,.....,.,. &lIlIbve IlIIl!C111' NardI Il_league Df CItIes. EnIJn
Rec>ided Paper Wngbt T...... CIIIIIkr CoIlIIdIus GelI9a. JeniIIa s. Well. CIIIIIaII'IesIdent. Ewns1uI w,.mng
.
..
f
-2-
.
We are hard pressed to think of a more critical issue to our Main Street merchants or to the future of
our communities and states that rely on sales taxes I ask you to Jom in a grass-roots campaign to make
sure every part of your community understands the Importance of thiS Issue-and the consequences if we
do not succeed Shortly we w1l1 be provldmg you and your colleagues, m coordmatlOn with your state
mumclpalleague, materials to help unleash a strategic and effectIve campaIgn
We Will keep you posted on progress on these priorities durmg the com1Og months and w1l1 be seek10g
your continued mvolvement as the work of the I06th Congress evolves Thank you for your contmu1Og
commItment and support
Our CongressIOnal City Conference last week 10 Wash1Ogton, DC demonstrated that we have much 10
common and that, acting together, we can mtluence the federal government. So I want to thank those of
you who came and contrIbuted so much of your time and effort. We made progress on each of our
priorities But we cannot rest upon those successes All members of your House and Senate delegation
w1l1 be in recess and back home dunng the first week of Aprll That Will be an excellent time to follow
up, achieve commItments, and send a message on behalf of your own CItizens from all of us. The
enclosed materials provide further 1OformatlOn Please keep me adVised as we work together to make a
difference on each of these issues for our constituents
S1Ocerely,
.
Clarence E. Anthony
President
Mayor, South Bay, Florida
Enclosure
.
~c r~/r?
\
Nationall.eague of Cities _
This five-point Action Agenda defines the major federal priorities of the leaders of
the nation's cities and towns for 1999. It was adopted by the National League of
Cities Board of Directors on Ma,:ch 6, 1999,- _to. gUit!e ~C's advocacy efforts this
year.
.
.
#1 Making Electronic Commerce Fair -
The federal govern",ent ",ust act to crellte a level pltqing jield for electronic co"''''erce or
sales of goods ad services over the Internet. The President tmd Congress ",ust clumge the
federal rules to ensure thllt retIIil b~inesses, cities, ad stIIteS Ctl1I tdl plq by the s"",e
rules--ll1ld thllt those ndes are fllir. It is unflCcepttlble for the fetlertll govern"'ent to treat
local businesses inequitllbly, depending upon whether they seD goods in a loclll store, on the
phone, by ",tzil order, or over the Internet. Federllllegisltltion should not crellle a protected
cltlSS of tllXpqers Ilt the expense of MtIin Street ad other tlDcpqers. Only the Congress ca
change federlll laws to provide authority for states to requil'.e .I!ut.-of-state 1IUIi!. ~rde!', .ad
electronic vendors to coOect ad re",it stille and loclll sllles tllJCt!S. ~ '. - . ~ - ~ ~ ;-
To ac~ieve this goal, NLC:
. Urges Congress and the President to request the General Accounting Office to provide a
comprehensive report on the impact of electronic commerce on Main Street retailers and on
current and projected impacts on state and local revenues. .
. Urges the President to appoint a commission composed of state and local elected leaders to
examine the consequences for the nation's public education and safety systems if there is a
failure by the President and Congress to act to create a level playing field within three years.
. Opposes any Internet commission that is not fully and fairly balanced, that does not include
Main Street retailers or a full balance oflocal and state elected leaders.
#2 Letting Cities Work
For the nation's ",unidpfllleaders, preemption has become the successor to unfunded fellerlll
",andlltes. This priority is dout putting a relll check on federlll pree",ption, ad to ",alee the
Administration ad Congress acco""table to our citizens. It is to press for a simpler, ",ore
rational, ad ",ore flexible intergovern",entlll system to let city leaers develop ",ore
.
1301 Pennsylvania Avenue., N.W. . Washington, D.C. 20004. (202) 626-3000 · www.nlc.org
"
innovative and cost eJJective methods of delivering programs, infrastructure, and services to .
citizens, and to enhance public involvement and restore public confidence in government. It
is to end the one-size-jits-all mentality thllt hIlS governed Ilt the federal level for too many -
. years and replace it with a true partnership thllt ensures a safe and healthy future for our
citizens. From telecommunications to Internet taxIltion to takings to electric deregulation,
preserving the ability of local governments to manage the public rights-of-way and receive fair
and reasonable compensation for their use, to protect municipal zoning and ttDdng authority
from federal intrusion, and to minimize the impact of deregulation on municipal revenues and
citizen costs is increllSingly important.
To achieve this goal, NLC:
. Supports legislation to restrict federal efforts to preempt historic and traditional municipal
and state authority, including preemption notes, a point of order against any federal
legislation that would preempt histone and traditional municipal authority, or other
appropriate tools.
. Supports strengthening the current Presidential Executive Order on Federalism to insure a
local voice in all Administration decision-making.
. Opposes any federal proposal that would interfere with traditional municipal authority
regarding infrastructure, land use, or other local priorities.
. Supports accountability, so that cities have the capacity to challenge any proposed federal
role or regulation which would preempt local authority or fails to disclose the intent and
legal authority to interfere with mun!cipal auth~rity. .
#3 Building A New Economy
We must build a new economy. We must ensure thllt an equitable share of our federal budget
is dedicated to local priorities and thllt a signiJkant share of any surplus is reinvested in the
future of our communities. The current economy is accelerating disparities in our cities
between the highest and lowest income families. The future economy and economic
opportunities will depend not only upon investments in the phYsical infrastructure of our
communities, but also upon investment in families and children, schools and educlltion. As
Congress and the President debate scrapping fet/erallegislation enacted at the height of the
Great Depression to now deregulate the nation's financial institutions, we must ensure that
every institution bears a responsibility to reinYest in its own community. The Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) requires that every federally guaranteed flnancial institution bears a
responsibility to rdum a share ofits deposits back into cities and towns.
To achieve this goal, NLC:
. Supports raising the 1997 budget caps, consistent with the growth in federal revenues, to
ensure current funding for priority housing and community development programs.
. Supports action to ensure preservation oflow-and-moderate income housing stock in cities.
· Urges dedication of an equitable share of any federal budget surplus to the nation's human
and public infrastructure to ensure the economy of our next generation. .
. Supports legislation to ensure that every federally insured financial institution bears a
- ------------- - ----- -. -- ----- - --- .....-............ - -.---- -- ----- ----
responsibility to reinvest back into its own community through strengthening the
. Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).
#4 Investing In Transportation
The President or Congress IIIust IIIaIee sure thllt Ilt lellSt tI portion of the future surplus is
reinvested in our publk injrtlstructure. Thllt will be the foundtltion for tI 21st century
econolllY. The federtzl governlllent IIIust IIIove swiftly to retluthorize the Federtzl Avitltion
.Adlllinistrtzdon before the current ltzw expires on MllI"ch 30th. With interntltiontll trtlde
tlccounting for netlrly one-thirtl of the econolllY, the CtlptlCity of tlirports in cities to htlndle
Ctlrgo tlnd trtlffic stlfely ad efficUmtly is IIIore iIIIporttlnt thlUl ever. The legislation IIIUst htzlt
diversion of trust fund revenues for other purposes. The legisltztion IIIust tzddress service to
under-served tlretlS. There tue 18,224 public ad privtlte flirports-netlrly tzll of them in cities
tlnd towns. Issues tzbout loctzl tlllthority and funding llI"e Ilt risle. The continutztion of federal
funding is critictzl to meeting SIIfety ad trtlfJic dellllUlds.
To achieve this goal, NLC:
.
. Supports immediate action by Congress and the President to invest in a world class system
of airports and airways.
. Opposes any federal tax refolDl proposal that would imperil the bonds we issue to build
airports, bridges, and highways to connect us to intemationil markets.
. Supports airport reauthorization and increased funding for airport infrastructure and aviation
safety and security programs and lifting the cap on passenger facility charges.
. Supports fully funding TEA-21 and halting the diversion of highway and airport trust funds
by the federal government
. Supports evaluation of the impact of existing transportation funding fonnulas on sprawl.
. Supports a review of existing transportation funding formulas for their impact on efficient
movement of goods and people through improved inter-modal connections.
#5 Electric Power To The People & Cities
Congress should letlVe the issue of electric utility deregulation to stlltes tlnd local
governments. F edertzllegisllltion could affect traditiontzlloctzl governlllent IlUthOrity, such lIS
zoning, revenue, and rlght-of-wtq IlUthOrity. It could affect the cost of power for tzll cities
and towns, lIS well lIS their citizens ad businesses. It could provide for a flll"-reaching federtzl
preelllption of trtulitiontzl stllte IIIUlloctzl authority. Legislaon hIlS tzlretuly been introduced
thm would retroactively chage the stIltus of ttJx-exelllpt bonds regarding IIIuniciptzl power.
As with ctzble rlltes, Congressionlllllction could lead to IIIuch higher costs. Not only could
rates increllSe for stlltes ad locIIl governlllents ad their citizens, but tzlso some of the
chtlnges being considered by Congress could elilllinllte taes IUId franchise fees collected by
state and local governments frolll electric utilities.
, "
.
_ _ -- _ ---- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~- _ -~ ~. - .
-. _ _ .---.".....-- ..------ ---------- ---------- -.....
To achieve this goal, NLC:
. Supports preserving the right of states and cities to act on restructuring without federal
interference.
. Opposes any federal preemption of franchise, revenue, or rights-of-way authority.
. Opposes any federal action to preempt municipal authority to issue municipal bonds to
finance public services for the repair, maintenance, and provision of electric generating and
transmission capacity to citizens and businesses.
. Supports partnerships with other organizations, including the American Public Power
Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures, to preserve local rights.
~~~"'~"
.
.
'.
C'
.
.
.
1344 South Second Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
17 March 1999
FYI
St~llwater City Council
Stillwater City Hall
216 N. Fourth Street
St~llwater, MN 55082
Gentlemen:
For several summers, preceding Lumberjack Days and Drum Beauty, a drum
group has rehearsed on the grounds of St. Peter's United Church of
Christ, across Orleans Street from our house. Last summer, when one of
us protested the racket, he was told by a police officer that the City
Council had given permission for this rehearsal.
How can you do this to us? When those clowns are pounding on drums
across the street it is impossible in our house to read, converse,
listen to music, watch television, or sleep.
We ask that in the fature you give!! permission for such rehearsals,
by drum groups or any other groups, at St. Peter's Church. We live in
a neighborhood which is residential and it should be treated as such.
By copy of this letter we are asking that St. Peter's Church also
withhold their permission for rehearsals on their grounds.
t7Jr
~B. EricksoD
c: file
Stillwater Police Department
Reverends Robert and Ruth Beck
Mr. and Mrs. Ronald Schad
TeIT7Z0~__ ~~4"'^ 3/3~l{'f.k
~~f~/~~~
- ~~
~
-
~~
..
10
11
12
13
..
W AsmNGTON COUNTY
c..... C Hegbelg
D1stllct 1
BID PLllknIbek
D1stJ1ct 2
WlII/y Abr8h8m8on
D1st1lct 31Chl11r
Myra PetenIon
DIaOIat 4
Dlclc Sr.ffard
DIstJIct 5
.,
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
APRIL 6, 1999, 12:15 P.M.
,. 4: ,. ... " "lJIl'" .g.. ......... ........orr: ... -I"'.... .. ... ~ ..
12:15 JotntMeetiDgoftbe~imdWas~~CounQ"Bo8rckOfCommissioners& . - _ .
to ; RegioDal Rail AiathOrttieS -AOakMarsll GoIfCtub, S6<<fmWOOdAvmue North - Oakdale _-
""-IS '>~,... ...<<..: .11::< ' ., " )' _v. """~-i:"'''-.o:",'' ~~~.... '11:( ".. ,,,
~ .. ....m'~~. ,>,"^"~"l: '-,. ~,.~ ~ 'f':....~::'\ ...(.~..'J ...:CL".Atf. ~ Ai..,. Y .<< ,,'oGo
,. <(; .... *Jc:f.. ..... -.....;>>,. ,......"'C,.4I. -i.< ,.......... Yt/fA...~""'_"'AJI"C.....~ ~ " P J4>
," ~Discussiorrof1oint ventures;' TraDsit P.Jmm1it&.ReS01JICe~eIy Facility and PropOSed
,....... ... ~~~'.: "wC~"f""'''' .......')~..jly' .... ~'~..~~... '.,I;, g'>^(..."*"''\".4rVll'' ,,;. ~"
<00 LeDic;.uuiuu ~..,. ... ...Jo.:~"""~ :v'+<'" ~-:,.)' .....t< ,~:.~~"'.... ,<<v,.. ( .., ^ .. :lio';'
, (~=-::v + ",-' .....)0."".. , t... ,," '.: '< '\ ~ ~,'" :0-...........0'1:.....4" ... ~
N '" }* q . ~1 + ~~ r,,;. ... .. - ~... ":0," YI .. .a. '" ~;::.~"'"", ... ,. \\ ...~, .... ,. , ^ .. "
2:30 -Board WorJish.~ith T~on~dPhys~~~<iDent~ Gounty BoardRoom .~
to .~~~ ,~.iS -:: ~ ~.. -It"~' 'i~:-.'~ ::f;'~ - -' /(, v'
i ....... .......-0('0'.. -v....,:""..:(...... ... ,...':/ ....:;;, ...",)~.. ':",,,,_-' ,~< ..._~: ... ... '" ,
4:00 " .' _~~)utYm:RoIem.Land~~~eDt ~,.~~-*';;-~Zt~':~".".~ - .."..' ::.
1.
2.
3
4:30
430
4.
5.00
5.
515
6.
5.30
7.
5.45
8.
5:55
9.
615
615
6.25
Roll Call
Consent Calendar
Community Volunteer Service - Melissa Eystad, Board PIesident
A Proc1aimi1tg April 18 - 24 as National V olu.nteer Recognition Week in Washington COlDlty
B. Presentation of Community Invo1vementAwards
Transportation and Physical Development - D. WJSDiewsld, Director
A Conidor Study for Tnmk Highway 36
B. Washington County LibraIylWoodbury Central Park Project Open House
Metro East Development Partnership - David Piggot, Executive Director
Report on Activities of the Partnership
. ,
Community Services Department - D. Papin, Director
Contract with Hmnan Services, Inc., Children's Mental Health Collaborative
General Administration - J. Schug, County j\drnini!;trator
Legislative Update
Discussion from the Audience
YbIIOr:f nroy61uDw tMlr __ "NIIIJ 1M COIUIIy BOOIfl ofCmtlmluulIlftn 011 ay 11_ JIOt 011 tIuI opm/D. 7718 CIunr WIll dir8cI 1M
County AtlmI1lUtrrltor iii J1"fIPIII'8 rapmua iii ytIIII' __ You tIIfI "'~K1 'IIpIl JIOt iii bs ~ of J1I'flIIIOII6 .pahn ad iii
hmJt your odtlr.6 iii JR IIIIIIIIIa
Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
T1Ju pcwd ofllla.w bs.... by 1M ~ 10 twptWIliI tluljiJI BOOIfl 011 t:t1IIWm#a tlI:IMtJa. maim _8111. on mllllllr:r
of l1li.,.., ad mftmlllll1tm. or,..8 quatJI1IU iii tIuI6I11jf TlJu IIdUIII u JIOt IIIIMIIItd iii rault 1II.umt11r1n18 boonl tlCtIon dunng
llJU tJm& by 1IdUIII-.ry__of~UIII will bsdtttbtlMlfortljionboonl...nng
Board Correspondence
Adjourn
Washington County Regional Rail Authority Convenes
A Roll Call _
B. Approval of the March 2, 1999 RRA Minutes
C. Rush Line Agreement
Adjourn
***MEETlNG NOTICES LISTED ON BACK***
H..Y.!!'!""==-"=~rv..-=~=r.~~439-32201
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTlfliilfy I AFF~ MATlVE ACTION EMPLOYER
...
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
APRIL 6, 1999
. following items are presented for Board approval/adOption.
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY ITEM
Administration
A Approval of the March 9, 16 and 23, 1999 Board Meeting minutes
B
Approval to appoint MaJel CaITOll, Cottage Grove, to the Community SOCIal
Services Advisory Committee to a first term expiring December 31, 2001
C
Approval to appoint Doug Johnson, County Attorney, as the County Attorney
representative to the Community Corrections AdVISOry Board to a term
expiring December 31, 2000
Assessment, Taxpayer Services D.
and Elections
Approval of abatement applicatIons for penalty.
Community Services
E. Approval of contract with the Family Links Family Service CollaboratIve to
administer local collaborative time study funds
Inty Attmney
F Approval to accept a safety programs grant from the Minnesota Department
of Labor and Industry
-
G Approval to apply for extension of grant funds from the Minnesota Center for
Crime Victim Services for salary/fringe benefits of an Assistant
VictimlWitness Coordinator ~ ,~~~ - -::
Recorder
~
H Approval of Plat of Arbors 2ad Addition located in West Lakeland Township
Transportation and Physical
Development
I Approval of execution oflease with Kathleen Peterson for property located at
14942 North 60. Street, Oak Park Heights
.Consent Calendar rtmIs are generally defined U Items of routme busmess, not n:qumng durcusmon, and approved m onc vote
C0D11D1SS101lClS may clect to pull a Consent Calendar Jtcm(s) for cbsGuss10n end/or scpntc acbOD
**********************************************************************
MEETING NOTICES
Date
Cl'mmittee
Time
Location
Apri! 6
i!
APr4 8
APr4 8
APn18
South Washington County Intergovernmental Group
Metto~::;aT Joint Powers Board
Plat . .on
911 Board
Community Social Services Advisory
MettoTAB
Internal Audit Advisory Committee
Mmnesota ExteDS10n
730~m
8 30 am.
9 30 a.m
1030a.m
730 am
1230pm
300pm
700pm
Wo~ City Hall
Heongrin ColDlty Government Center
W~ County Government Center
2099 Univ~ Avenue West
Waslun.Rton COunty Government Center
230 E 5lIl Street - Mears Park Centre
Wasbi!Jgton County Government Center
1825 CUrve Crest - St1llwater
APR-02-1999 14:11
CITY OF OPH
P.02/1212
CrIY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
CIlY COUNCIL MINI WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, APRIL 6, 1999
FOLLOWING BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
· No Infcanation will be ineluded witb tIu. paclm or hwded oui: ai: the work :session. Thi. is for
inforJl14tiona.lJconvel'lational pwpo8e. only.
DISCUSSION OF LAKE ELMO LEITER
DISCUSSION OF NSP LEGISLATION STA.TUS
DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM
DISCUSSION Or MNDOT ISSUES (RECAP OF MEETING WITH MNDOT AND STILLWATER)
BAYPORl'/OAK P.ARK HSIOBTS COOPERATION ISSUES
TOTAL P 1212
..
.
.
.
.
.
STILLWATER TOWN BOARD MEETING
Town Hall
March 25, 1999
PRESENT: Chairperson Jerry Hicks, Supervisors Ken LaBoda,
Sheila-Marie Unt~edt and Louise Bergeron. Also,
Engineer Paul Pearson, Planner Meg McMonigal and
Attorney Andrea Poehler.
7:00 P.M.
1. AGENDA - M/S/P LaBoda/Bergeron moved to adopt the agenda as amended.
(4 ayes)
2. MINUTES - M/S/P Untiedt/LaBoda moied to approve the 3/11/99 Stillwater
Town Board Meeting minutes as written. (4 ayes) -
3. TREASURER-
1.
2.
3.
Balances for February were reported. -
Checks #13823 thru #13831 "and 'claims #2411
thru #2425 were approved for payment.
Attorney Poehler will check into a blanket _
yearly authority for the ~reasurer to invest
township fund"s. ,=. ...."-;~.. '~-'': .~.~ .-~'" .- .
M/S/P Berger.onlLaBoda ~~inoved 'th-a't Firstar -: '."
B"a-nK'--bethe "official-towri'sh'ip"':'c:t"epository in -- -
1999 (4 . ) . -:.. .....:~o,J~'- ~ 'v ~
. . ayes . - .. _ ~... "" . -:i '. ,., ~ ~ ~ - - .
" M/S/P 'Bergero'n/LaBctda:: moye~ ~o, :a!J~hor.i ze -, ....., --
~~he treasurer",to renew ~~}75,~00.~0 certificate.-
(4 ~ Y e.s ) . ~ -,,, ~, t &..;:>:::. v.!. ." . '-
_. .. ;...: f T"''''= --:. ~ '. - '7' ": 5 ; -
. ~ _,.. ".6':' ...
4.
.
-- 5.
::~~:~ ~-
4. BERGMANN PROPERTY - A deferred assessment on this property that may be
sold will be brought up at the ~oint Planning Board on April 14.
" . ~
5. STONEHENGE - 2ND ADDITION - M/S/P. LaBoda/Untiedt moved to give final
approval for Stonehenge 2nd Addition per county requirements and approval.
(4 ayes)
6. DNR GRANT - BROWNS CREEK WATERSHED - M/S/P Untiedt/Bergeron moved that
the chair sign a grant request of Brown's Creek-Watershed for a Conservation
Department Planning Grant. (4 ayes)
7. STONEBRIDGE TRAIL - Engineer Pearson talked about a meeting with
Washington County Public Works people regarding Stonebridge Trail. The
chair asked that this report be put in writing.
M/S/P Bergeron/Untiedt moved that the peace officer ticket for speeds in
ext:ess of 45 mph on Sto-n-ebridge Trail.' (4 ayes)
8.
-
PUBLIC WORKS
1. Brushing has' been completed.
money left over for mowing.
Plenty of budget
.
Stillwater Town Board Meeting - 3/25/99
.
Page Two
2. It is expected that the road restrictions will
come off early in May.
3. Representatives from-the county public works
department were present. <
a. County Highway 61 will be rebuilt.
There will be no cost sharing expected
unless ,a trail system:'is ad,ded. The
chair asked that .the park commi~tee
consider a trail since they have the
budget for it. An open house to"look
at the design will be held 4/14/99 from
5:30 - 7:30 p.m. at the public w~rks
department. ,'-: :;.
b. There was talk about the Highway 12 and
_ 15 upgrade. The township position of
-r no _cost 'sharing will !be decided ,by the _ ,
county board.' ".' . . - ,,';:,.;1'; '!'.f. ' ,
.
.
. ~ -
'\ ..~.. ~
9 . P LAN N I N G COM MIS S ION - MIS 1 PUn tie d t 1 B erg 'e r,o n ...II! 0 v e d t 0 a p. pro v e' "1:'h e
application of Karen Richtman for a"po'sit'io~n'" o'n' the vpark .committee.
(4 ayes) . .... . -';'.. L~ .' - . -" . '-' -
; 11 '" ,~l t ... .. J:; ~:: ~~ -,f -:.r ) - ".. :.. ~ c .......;: ',,_ _ "! r:
. " ...~ - ~ . \ ....,. f... : _ J _....ro ~
,.. J".. ..c ...t,.. ~ .. ... "L~,.!' _ "" t" ,. '.. ..~ _~ ' :- "'~"... r ~ ...
10. ENVIRONMENTAL DAY - Karen' Richtman reYiewed,~he-proposed actiyities
.. _l'" ..; - 104. .. { ~ I" c..\.. f!..., " r - .. I'" oJ. ....
and schedule. Passed out a sign up sheet to.-the supervis()'~.s.:.s .'.
11. ED OT I S - CITY COMPR EH'ENS I'VE "PLAN/)'ERGMANr4 ~'p'ROPERTyl:': .Mr. Oti s' is
concerned that the Bergm~nn Property propose~'developmeri~ violates. the .
C~ty of Stillwater's Compreh,e~nsli.~e !Ja~;~~,.~e'-:--r..~~uests :th.at. theA:supervisors
d 1 rec t . the j 0 i nt p 1 ann .i,n g~ re.p.,re s_~ h~8; ~~ v~.~: _~o ..Y,p~~! "no, fpt. !.,t..hr.e :d.e~e 1 ,opme nt .
After ltemizing all the violations'~he;tsees ,~:in~their 'plan, a cJ)nsensus ,of
the board members was that'the planning 'commission should review ~he matter
~t their next meeting. . Meg ~c!'19nigaJ -Y#Jl,L.s~~:~hat _memb~rs recetye. a.1l t.he
1 nforma t i ~n she has gotten 'from, J:~~: c ~ty,..;: Dir....ept i~on for ~th_e-Lj o)_nt:.boar~ ..:
members wlll be placed on the Ap~ll~8 town board meetlng.'
.. 'r ... "........ _ ..".. ..., ..., ~ _ .. :
.. " ~ :...... f I .1'1" ,,~t ..... ,"," 1 r T (I'" ,"I l .. -: I:'" \.,t.;: ~.
12. ADJOURNMENT:' Meeting adjourned at .10:12 p;fn;-';~'::':-~-...;:;-~---;':-;::--~-2-:-"Z~:~
... ~ j f .:.; ~ ~ ~ _ l. /"... I./'4- , !ll..... _... (I..' -.....,. .)
Clerk
. ,
\
-
.,. ... ~ ...., \
...:...t.. _"*... :... .-..._ .....~.. "",..'':''-
'" 1~ - -, '\ ,. :. t'
, i", \...r.,l ; t "j
, -
.
,
- -...- """ ~....
'.
, .
- .,
r"" -
... '_ ,I....
"'II: ...:.(\'"
Chairperson
.
.
);.....,I-...'~ "'t~_I-1t-Ij~-
- ..... \'
'\ 'If.; ~...,..11;- I ....
...) 1..:. " ! ... '1 I" :J
....-_-~\~ .~:~~...":_:..!:":R_ -
- ... - C'
. ,
.. - r II'
_ ,J
Approved
I _I' t
.-
. .
c. ~..
;... '
""~ 4 -
..: I,
-,
- ,
-.. : ': ! .. r'
, ~
.
,
, -
03/26/1999 22:22 6514394705
PAGE 01/01
StIllwater Township
. Calendar
Chair Johnson
,
April - 1 . PlaMing Commission 7.00 PM
.
April 8 Town Board Meeting 7.00 PM
April 13 Park Committee 7.00 PM
I3P"'NewDate April 14 Highway 61 open house 5.30 P .M.-7:30 PM
April 14 Joint Planning Meeting 7:00 P.M.
April -15 Board Of ~iew 5 00 PM-6:00 PM
liP New Date April 15 Architect Meeting 6.00 PM-7:OO PM
.
April 22 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM
Chair Johnson
.
.May 1 Environmental Day
.May. -= ~..!~~~_~!~~o~ . _
May ~ " .8 Heavy Meta; Day ~ , =. . -
f ~ .. .I .. f r , ...1... _ ..' .. -..
May '10 Park COrrimittee -:
... ...)./'...
.. ~ ... .... - ... -:. ...1
May 13' TCMfl Board Meeting
May 22 Heavy Metal Day Rain Date
May 27 Town Board Meeting
9:00 AM - 3.00 PM
7:00 PM
_ ~ __ ~ toO M_"
. . 8.00 AM -1:00 PM
I ..J I '
- 7:00 PM
7:00 PM
8:00 NIt -1.00 PM
7:00 PM
Chair laBoda
June 3 Planning CORVnlssion 7:00 PM
June 10 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM
June 14 Park Committee 7:00 PM
June 24 Town Board Meeting 7:00 PM
Pat Bantli
Clerk, Stillwater Township
March 27, 1999
.
~Ii~
.-as.:.1 c~1
150 YElls or PaDGJESS It savd
1.
2.
3.
9:00
9:00
4.
9:10
5.
9:20
6.
9:30
.
10: 1 0
8.
9.
10.
10:30
WASHINGTON COUNTY
DennIs C Hellberg
DI8UICt 1
BiI PuIIlrIIbek
DIatnc:t 2
Wdy AbrM_
DIatnc:t 3/Chu
Myre Peterson
DIatnc:t 4
DIck SUffonl
DlRnct 5
COUNTY BOARD AGENDA
~CII23,1999,~
Roll Call
Consent Calendar
Public Health and Environment - M. McGlothlin, Director
Resource Recovery Project Contract with BFI Waste Systems of North America
Transportation and Physical Development - D. WIsniewski, Director
Detour Usage ofCR 78 and CSAH 21
Minnesota Extension - C. Leifeld, Extension Coordinator
Resolution Concerning Economic Crisis for Farm Families and Rural Communities
General Administration - J. Schug, County Administrator
A. Legislative Update and County Position on Legislative Issues
B. Commendations to Forest Lake High School & Tartan High School Boys Basketball Teams
Discussion from the Audience
VISitOrs IIUl)I share theu COncertl$ With the Cowtty BtHU'fl ojCommwloners 011 mry Item 1I0t 011 the agenda 17Ie Cluzlr Will direct the
COU/lty Admlllutrator to prepare ruptJllSes to yt1IIr COJU:eI7I$ You are eIICOll1"Dged /lOt to be repetitious ojprevlous spea1cers and to
limit your tJJ/drt!$$ to Jive mllllltes
Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions
ThIS penod oj tl1lle sluzll be used by the CommwIoners to report to the full Board 011 c01fl1lllttee activities. mDlce co1ll1llelllS 01l1llOtters
ojlllterest tJ1Id IIIjormtltlOIl. or raISe fIIIUtIDIU to the 8tIIjf 7711S actloll IS /lOt IIItended to result III 8IIbstalltlve board actloll dllTllIg
thIS time AllY actlOlllleceuary bec_ of dlSCII$SIO/I WIll be IChetluledjor afutllre board meetlllg
Board Correspondence
Adjourn
*************************************************************
Reminder: No Board Meeting March 30, 1999 - sa Tnesday
Date
March 22
MFh 23
~h24
March 25
March 25
March 25
MEETING NOTICES
Committee
Time
Location
Library Board
P1anmng AdvISOry Conmnsslon
Reg Sohd Waste Mgmt Coord. Board
Commumty CorrectIons
Red Rock Comdor
Met. TAB
6:30 pm
700pm.
10.30 a.m.
7 30 a.m
3.30 p.m.
12:30 pm
1010HeronAve N -Oakdale
Wasbmgton County Government Center
Rachsson Hotel- St Paul
Wasbmgton County Government Center
Cottage Grove City Hall- Cottage Grove
230 E 5th St - Mears Park Centre
ASSlStMl bstemm1_BtrllIVIIIIabIt1 for use 111 the Counrv IltJacd Room
If need IISSlStBnce due til or lallauat1e barner. se -caD ~6000 (Tl20 439-322Q
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPO TUNYrr, AFFCFfrrATIVE ACTION EMPLOYE~
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
CONSENT CALENDAR *
MARCH 23, 1999
The following items are presented for Board approval/adoption:
.
DEPARTMENT/AGENCY ITEM
Assessmen~ Taxpayer Services, A.
and Elections
Human Resources
Sheriff
Transportation and
Physical Development
Approval of on and off-sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license for Veterans Rest
Camp in Marine, for the period of April 1, 1999 to March 31, 2000.
B.
Approval of on-sale and Sunday intoxicating liquor license for the Outing
Lodge at Pine Point, Inc. in Stillwater, for the period April 1 , 1999, to March
31,2000.
C.
Approval of resolution, eXemption from lawful gambling license for the
American Heart Association Minnesota affiliate to be used at Castlewood Golf
Course in Forest Lake.
D. Approval to continue a special project clerk typist position through December
31, 1999.
E.
,
I
I
.1
Approvat of a substitute special project supervisory position of Program
Manager for the poSition of Environmental Services Coordinator through
December 31, 2000, in Public Health and Enviro~ent. ._:
F. Approval of resolution, annual boat and water safety enforcement agreement.
G. Approval to accept a grant from Minnesota Join Together (MJT) in the amount
of $4,600.
H. Approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Contract PWR-1998-145
with Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) in the amount of $82,380 for
engineering design services for the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 21
improvement project at Trout Brook and Dodge's Corner. -
.Consent Calendar Items an: generally defmed as Items of roubDe busmess, not rc:qumng dlSCUSSlon. and approved In one vote.
CommIssIoners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar ltem(S) for dlSCUSSlon and/or separate act10n .
M~R-19-1999 11:02
.
CITY CF OPH
.
CIlY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 1999
CI1Y COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
1:00 P.M. AGENDA
EDA MEETING
To follow regular council Meeting
7:00 p.m. 1. Cd to OrderlApproval2f Atenda
7:05 p.m. II. Depart:mentlCouncill.iai.on Reportll
A. Pl.'I'Il'dng Com~ininn
B. parlrs CO"If"WWn
c. Cable CO"ll'l'li.-iou
D. Wat., ManagemClllt OZ,IDhatiODII
1. Browu', Creel. Wateohed District
2. Middle St. Croix Water Management OrganizAtion
E. Other
7 :20 p.m III. VilJitorslPuI,hc Cownnant
A. Recydmg Awad (1)
.
Tlu. ~ AD oppoftunity for the puLIic to .ddn.. the Council with queltio1'l8 or ClCZlcema on
issues DOt tJ&d of the repIar apda. (Pl....llisllt comments to 3 mmute. in len.th.)
7:25 p.m. IV.
Consent A;enda (Roll Call Vote)
A ApPZ0V8 Bill. fllnwatmenu
B. Approve City Council Minutes - Much 9, 1999 (2)
C Petfozmel I.suet
1. App~ove AFSCME Contract (3)
2. ApprCNt W pay (4)
3. Approve adoption of non-police educational standard (5)
D. AwaECl Lids for AS400 computer .".tan (6)
E. Appmve 1'1'1;1.. reimlnusement pohqr (7)
F. Approve tin.JV.aMU oE police door (8)
G Appnm: request Eo~ police com.puter upgrades (9)
H Corre.pondaace regazdiDg CUP request (10)
public lieaMgS
A. Tree Ozdmance (11)
7:30 p.m. V.
.
P.02/03
MAR-19-1999 11:02
CITY OF OPH
7:45 pm. VI. New Busmess
A. Approw May 8,1999 for City's Spring Clean-Up
B. Approve August 8, 1998 for Pazty in the pazk
C. Adoption of 1999 StrategiCl Planning Goal. And Dehnitwns (12)
8 15 p ttl. VII old Business
A. Ac:lopuon of 1999 Compo plan (13)
1) Approval o~ Sewer PLuJExecutive Summary (14)
2) Approval of Pa.rk P!anlExecuf:ive Sutnma.1y (15)
B. Approve Sheet reconstructio;u plan with scheclulin~ changes (16)
C. Ryder ExteuWn (17)
D. Prairie Re.toration and Trail Gra.ut (18)
9:00 p m VIII. Ad!m!t"fttnW
8_1 ptJ..;", GI App1J-. to /JI..
P.l2l3/03
TOTAL P.03
.
.
.
MAR-19-1999 15:49
.
CITY OF OPH
CITY C011KCIL
MEJtTiNGS II WORKSHOPS
MARCH. APRIL, 1999
P.l2lVI2l1
March 19.1999
Tuesday, March 23
MN Dot Bridge Meeting
Tuesday, March 23
Wednesday, March 24
Thursday, March 25
Tuesday, April 6
Tuesday, April 13
.Thursday, April 15
Monday, April 19
Tuesday, Apri120
Tuesday, April 27
.
10:00 a.m.
7:00 p.m.
2:00 p m.
8:30 a.m.- 2:30 p.m.
7:00 p m.
7 :00 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
6:30 p In.
6:00 p.m.
7:00 p m.
City Council Meeting
(Council Chambers)
Sacial Gathering at Applebee's to follow
Coalition of Utilities Cities
(League of Minnesota Cities Blue
Mound Room)
1999 Legislative Conference
League of Minnesota Clties
Board of Review
(Council Chambers)
City Council Meeting
(Council Chambers)
Social Gathering at Applebee's to follow
Planning Commission Meeting
Park Commission Meeting
City Council Worksession
(Large Conference Room)
Social Gatherinc at Applebee's to roUow
City Council Meeting
(Council Chambers)
Social Gatherinc at Applebee'. to follow
G' \SHARED\COUNCIL\MEETINOS. WPD
TOTAL P.12l1
From AMM To Chill1te. Kamn
.
AMM FAX
NEWS
March 22-26, 1999 (no. 2)
Cate 3/25/99 Time 1 03 54 PM
Page 2 of 2
EFPJ
Auociation of
Metropolitan
Municipalities
State of Region
add ress set for
Monday, March 29
.
The annual State of the Region
address sponsored by the
Metropolitan Council Will be held
on Monday, March 29 at the
Leamlngton Transit Hub In Minne-
apolis
The hub IS located between
Second Avenue and Seventh
Street The event,
which Includes
a presenta-
tion by
Met
Council
Chair Ted
Mondale,
Will run
from 9-11 a m If
you plan to attend please regISter
by calling 851 6921881 There IS
no charge to attend
AMM Fax Newlllll faxed pentJdu:lIlly
10 IIll AMM CIly ",anll6e17 IIIId
~,.. The uifor"''''''tI111 IIIII1Iukd
10 be MtII'ed WIth "'tI,YDI'J', _cIlnrentb/!!l'1I
Mil 8IIqJUI urdo to keq oJlfClllb IIbrnst
of""Porl/lnl ",etro CIly IIIIIIU!II
CCOl'ynght 1999AMM
.
14S UmNrIllly A_1M IV..,
St Pr.Iul, MN S51fJJ-Z0.t4
Phone (651) ZI5-4(}(}()
Fax (651) ZBl-1l99
E-mail. flIII1II@tlmlPll45 org
WdJ SlIe http /1Www fIIfIlfI/45 org
CORRECTION:
The telephone number to register
for the State of the Region should
be: 651-602-1844. The number
was listed incorrectly on the
3/23/99 News Fax.
Stillwater Township
March 25, 1999
Chair:
Hicks
700pm
Regular Meeting
A2enda:
Adopt
Minutes:
Approve Mmutes March 11, 1999
Treasurer:
1 Report
2 Clatms & Checks
Attornev:
1 DISCUSS Green Acres, Deferred Assessments
Planner:
1
En2ineer:
1
Public Works:
1
Clerk:
1 Miscellaneous
Committees:
1
People - 8:30 PM: 8 00 Steve Nelson, Peace Officer
8 15 Highway 61 Upgrade
830 Intersection HIghways 12 and 15
8 45 Karen Richtmann Environmental Day
9 00 Ed Otts re Bergmann Town Houses
Old Business: 1
New Business: 1
Adiourn
Note:
3/20/99
Pat Bantli
.
.
.
MRR-24-1999 10:20
.
7:00 p.m. I.
7:05 p.m.. II.
.
7:15 p.m. III.
7:20 p.m. IV.
.
CITY OF OfIH
P.02/03
CI1Y OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS
FOllOW-UP AGENDA FOR
TIJESDAY, MARCH 23,1999
CI1Y COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.
EDA MEETING
To follow zegulu Councll Meetinlt
Call to Order! A1!>>rmral of ~cncla
Councilmem1.. Beaudet al.ent
Approv.J of .taH to adwdi.. Eor open Plam\inlt Commi..ion memLer addecl..
Item D. oE New Bu.m...
D~entlCounClill i.ll~1InJ1 Repom
A. Plau.Ding Commission
UpclODliftg m8etiq. OD Apnl8 imd Apri!15
B. ParLs Commission
UpcomiDt Mee=p on April 5 and April19i Hm.Lm, P~. Camp
Plan
C. Cable COInTniRiou
Cable ErancLi.. pab& L.~ on Apri!21 at t :30 p.m. .t Stillwater
City Hall; Joint Po,.... Agnement on Council'. Apri!13 Dleeting for
appzov..I
D. Water Managemem Organbations
1. BrOW21', C~ Watershed DiririCJt
Up.L.te pnmded
2. Middle St. Czoix Water MaI14gement Org&nization
E. Other
MJd>OT lmdp metiftt "pd.te; OPH. stillwater .ncl MnDOT on April
5 at 1.30 .t SUIUlJlid. to dUCWlI alipment
VisitorslPublic Cnll'lll'lent
Rial. RoiL, re~~ 0 ~ of 14381 60'" Strnt North. Tlu... item wu
di.ggl.ccl Eunh.. during CChUlClil'. conddcration of Compo pI.n
A. Reoyding Award
Dou~.. R. Joluuon, 5676 01lfield Avenue North
Consent Afenda (Roll Call Vate)
App~t'ecl ".0
A. Approve Bill. 6J lmestments
B. Approve City COW1Clil Mmutcs - Much 9, 1999
C. Penounell.sues
1. Approve AFSCME Contmct
2. Approve LacL pay
3. Approve adoption of Dou-poliee eduClatio:ua! standaxd
D. Award LicI. for AS400 computer system
E. Appr.ove mileage reimb\UElen1ent pohey
F. Approve finalization ol po&e door
MAR-24-1999 1121:21 CITY OF OflH
P.f213/f213
.
G. Appxove requett for police wmputer upgrades
H. CornspODdenee ngarding CUP lequest
7 :25 p.m. V. &J,lic Hearinp
.
A. T lee OrodmllDee
AppIOwd .. pmamted 41.0
7:30 p.m. VI. New Business
A. App""" May 8,1999 for City's Spring Clean-Up
B. Approve August 8, 1998 fol' Party in the park
c. Adoption ol1999 Strategic: Plamung Goals and DetimtlOD'
Approved .0
D. Approval of Staff to advertise for Planning CCJJJUniI.ion Opening
8:15 p.m. VIl. Qld BII.ift_
A. Adoption of 1999 Compo pIau
Approved with c~, continfen.t UpOft Met Council Approval, 4-0
'. 1. Appmwl of Sower PlaD/Exewtive Summary
Appzovecl ".0
2. Approval of Park PLu.!Exec:utive Summazy
Appaowd ..0
StalE dinat.cd. to prepue . 120 cia,. montorilun ordinange on.
~ cd Centnl Bu.u.... DietriGt to mul,. the Ate for Aprll13, .
1999 Ccnuu:il Meeting'
B. Approve Smet reClODStruct:ion plaD with "cb.edulm, cls&r1ges
A,~"..d 4-0
C. Ryder Extenrion
Esten.iou nCJUe.t demecl if an.t.rial. 11ft not l'ec:eived Ly Fricla,., Marcb
~6,l999
D. Prairie Restor.&n and T rad Grant
Ma~ E.mct. oE $1,100 from Par~ Dedication. Fun.d Approved 4-0
8:0t p.m. Rec:e.8 to EDA Meeting
App~val 01 Baypon Fin D.putmellt: to 11M tLe Bell pmperty, 5416
Statecoad. Trail NortL, for ..oJ. training tIuoue'h May 1, 1999, with
nei;bLoa to be noti&d. prior to ad. and 0Vfty tr~ .I.um. Approved 4-
o.
Appro-vJ of staff to t'8DlO"ft B.n pl'~ home.. lOOn. AI po.lilJe .Et.r the
mlok. trA~ i. Eini.hecl AppI'O-ved 4-0.
EDA MeetiDg.djcnuned at 8;10 p.m.
ReguI. City Couacil m.eeting l'Konvencd .t 8:10 p.m.
8:11 p.rn. VIII. AdjOU%mDent
.
TOTAL P.f213
Editorial Contact:
Karen Richtman
351-9162
.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Family Environmental Event Planned
STILL WATER, Minnesota.-- Are you
ready to RRR umble? Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, that
isl Come join in the fun at the Washington County
Fairgrounds when Stillwater Township presents, A
Family Environmental Event on May 1 st from
9 a.m. until 3 p.m. The focus of the event is
environmental stewardship. Admission is free.
Many activities are being planned, Including: earth-
friendly carnival games for children of all ages,
environmental displays and resources on prairie
restoration, weed control, recycling, watersheds, hazardous waSte,
and landscaping for wildlife. Make a May Day project out of recycled
materials in the Children's Craft Area. A raffle to benefit renovation of
the Stillwater Township Hall will be sponsored by 4H. If you'd like to
exhibit at the event or make a donation for the raffle, please call
Event Coordinator, Karen Richtman at 351-9162.
.
Dear Neighboring Community,
Please feel free to include this infimnation in your newsletter and post it in your
community.
Stillwater Tuwnship is sponsoring this event fur all area residents as most of the
issues and displays apply to all residents of the area and we would be delighted to see you
all there.
Any questions, please feel free to contact either Karen Richtman 351-9162 ar
Sheila-Marie Untiedt 439-6476.
~~\
Sheila-Marie Untiedt
Stillwater Township Supervisar
.
I
-I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
=I
I I
I
~p~
'1/~/91
Report On
McKusick Lake Analysis
And Management Plan
Stillwater, Minnesota
March, 1999
File No. 510-98-801
~ f1 ~ Bonestroo
~ Rosene
- - Anderlik &
1\]1 Associates
EngIneers & ArchItects
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
Executive Summary
In August, 1997, the City of Stillwater adopted an Alternative Urban Areawide Review
(AUAR) and MitIgation Plan for annexing Just over 1,800 acres on the west side of the
City. The AUAR evaluated potential environmental impacts from the development of
thIS land and proposed a mitigation plan to avoId, minimize, and/or mitigate these
impacts. The cornerstone of the mItigation plan was the dtversion of stormwater flowing
from Long Lake and other portions of the annexation area away from Brown's Creek - a
designated trout stream - and instead through McKusick Lake to the St. Croix River.
Lake residents are concerned that the AUAR's proposed stormwater diverSIon Will
adversely affect the aesthetic and recreational qualities of the lake. They have expressed
a desire to at least maintain - and hopefully improve - the phYSICal condition and
recreational suitability of McKusick Lake In the future. The City of Stillwater is also
concerned about the quality ofMcKusIck Lake. At the same time, the City has made
legal and financial comtttments to implement the AUAR and its mitigation plan. In order
to balance its obhgatIon to implement the AUAR With its desire to work with McKusick
Lake :.;:esidents to safegaurd and enhance that resource, the City initiated development of a
mangement plan
To develop the management plan, the City Council authorized this study m October
1998. To guide the study, the Counctl appointed a task force with representatives from
the City of Stillwater, McKusick Lake Association, the Middle St. CroIX Watershed
Management OrganIzation, the Washington County Soil and Water Conservation
District, and the MN Department of Natural Resources. This task force met four times
between October 1998 and March 1999 to develop the management strategy. The issues
driving the development of the management plan were
· Maintaming as high a normal operating level as reasonably possible in
McKusick Lake
· Protecting water qualIty and preserving/enhancing the recreational
suitabIhty ofMcKusick Lake
· Protectmg Brown's Creek from Impacts asSOCIated with development
of the annexation area
· Maintaining the diverse biotic commumty in the large wetland north of
McKusIck Lake
· Assuring that flows dISCharging from McKusick Lake can be carried
safely through the City to the St. CroIX River.
The first question addressed by the task force was the prOJected impact of the diversion
on water quality in McKusick Lake. Phosphorus levels in the lake are of special concern
because higher levels of phosphorus can increase the abundance of algal growth in a lake,
decreasing water clarity and reducing recreational suitabihty. An examination of
ExecutIve Summary
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
historical data collected on the lake between 1994 and 1997 showed that average summer
phosphorus concentrations ranged between 53 and 106 ppb. Inspite of the wide
variability in phosphorus concentrations, mean water clarity values ranged only from 1.1
- 1 2 meters for the same period of record.
Computer modeling to SImulate the Impact of the diverSIon on phosphorus concentrations
m McKusick Lake suggests that average summer in-lake phosphorus concentrations after
the diversion will range between 100 and 110 ppb, depending on the extent of water
quality treatment ponding m the upstream watershed. These concentrations are similar to
those at the upper end of the hIstorical range. Assuming histoncal relationships hold
between in-lake total phosphorus and water clarity, water clarity in the lake after the
diverSIon should be simIlar to that before the diversIon.
Management options were identIfied and evaluated by the Task Force for
maintaining/improving the physical conditIon and recreational suitability of McKusick
Lake The Task Force adopted the following recommendatIons to forward to the
Sttllwater City Council:
1. The normal water elevation in McKusick Lake should be set no lower than
853~ contingent on the donation to the City of flood easements up to the
1 DO-year htgh water elevation by all riparian landowners. The existing
water level elevation control for the north wetland should remain the same
as it is currently. (Note: This option will protect Brown's Creek at least as
well as the preferred option in the AUAR with respect to total volume,
peak rate, and total duration of spills to Brown's Creek from the lake.)
2. Evaluate and develop a strategy to modify the downstream channel below
McKusick Lake to accommodate the increased flows through the lake.
3. Construct wet detention basins in the watershed as development proceeds.
4. Improve the recreational swtabihty of the lake by:
. Adopting an ordinance prohibItmg use of gasoline motors on the lake.
. Installmg a public canoe landing at the eXIsting park area on the
southeast comer of the lake.
. ConstructIng a fishmg pIer
. Secunng cooperation from MnDNR to stock gamefish periodically.
. Installmg a winter aeration system, If needed.
. Developmg tratls connecting the lake with other areas of the City.
5. Improve shoreline management of the lake by, at a minimum, developing
a shoreline management demonstration area on the City-owned land near
the lake outlet.
6. Adopt non-structural methods of protecting water qualIty, such as
improved street sweeping and public education.
A public information meetIng was held on February 25, 1999 to review these
recommendations. Based on comments receIved at the meeting, the affected public
endorses the strategy developed by the Task Force
ExecutIve Summary
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
LAKE ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN FOR MCKUSICK LAKE
-FINAL REPORT-
Introduction
In August, 1997, the City of Stillwater adopted an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
and Mitigation Plan for annexmgJust over 1,800 acres on the west side of the City. The AUAR
evaluated potential enVIronmental impacts from the development of this land and proposed a
mitlgatIon plan to avoid, minimize, and/or mitlgate these Impacts The cornerstone of the
mitigation plan was the diversion of stormwater flowing from Long Lake and other porttons of
the annexatIon area away from Brown's Creek - a designated trout stream - and instead 1hrough
McKusick Lake to the St. Croix River.
During the last fifty years, the quality of McKusick Lake and its recreational value have
changed These changes have occurred mainly as a result of development and consequent
stormwater runoff from areas adjacent to the lake. In addition, a dike was constructed at the
north end of the lake which diverted flows from the upper reaches of Brown's Creek and spring
dIscharges away from the lake. Lake residents are concerned that the AUAR's proposed storm
water diversion will affect the aesthetic and recreational qualIties of the lake further. They have
expressed a desire to at least maintain -and hopefully improve- the phYSICal condition and
recreational suitability of McKusick Lake in the future.
The City of Stillwater IS also concerned about the qualities of McKusick Lake. At the same
tIme, the City has made legal and financial commitments to implement the AUAR and its
mitIgation plan In order to balance its obligation to implement the AUAR with Its desire to work
with McKusICk Lake reSIdents to safeguard and enhance that resource, the City initiated the
development of a management plan for McKusick Lake. The management plan was intended to
assess the current and historical status of the lake, estimate the impact of the diversion on the
lake, and Identify opportunities for improving the lake's ecological, aesthetic, and recreational
qualitIes cost-effectively.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Issues
A number of issues involving McKusick Lake and the AUAR MitIgation Plan were raised during
the process of drafung the AUAR. These issues formed the backdrop for the discussions that
took place on development of a management plan for McKusick Lake and are described briefly
below.
. Lake levels on McKusick Lake The protected waters permit from the MnDNR identifies a
normal water level of 852 3 MSL for the lake The lake level was raised to approximately
853.5 sometime durmg the 1990's Without authorization from the MnDNR. Many residents
expressed great concern about returning the lake to the lower water level, and how this might
affect the lake's aesthetIc qualitIes and Its abtlIty to maintam a suitable water level durmg dry
years
. Water quality and recreational suitability of McKusick Lake. Many residents remember
when McKusick Lake was a higher quality lake with a good fishery and a much higher
recreational value than it has presently. Most suggested that the quality decreased
significantly when the dike at the north end of the lake was constructed in the late 1950's.
They also expressed a concern about the impacts on water quality in the lake as a result of the
proposed diversIon.
. Protection of Brown's Creek. Brown's Creek is ranked as one of the six highest priority
trout streams for protection in the Metro region by the MnDNR. Adverse Impacts to Brown's
Creek associated with runoff from future development in the annexation area was the
primary envlIonmental issue driving the AUAR. One of the key strategies adopted m the
AUAR for protecting Brown's Creek was the diverSIOn away from the creek of all
stormwater runoff from the annexation area for up to a 3-inch rmnfall event. In additIon, the
AUAR establIshed that backwater discharge from McKusIck Lake to Brown's Creek not
occur for events less than or equal to a 5-year ramfall (3.5 inches in 24 hours). These
standards must be maintained to provide adequate protection to the trout fishery in Browns
Creek.
. Protection of the large wetland north of McKusick Lake. Currently, this wetland supports a
diverse wetland plant community and is of high value for wildlife habitat, flood control, and
other important functions. Preservation of the capability of this wetland complex to support
a diverse vegetative community was identIfied as an important issue by MnDNR
representatives.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuslck Lake
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
· Adequacv of conveyance svstem below McKuSICk Lake The capabilIty of the conveyance
system below McKusick Lake to accommodate the increased flow volumes discharging from
McKusick Lake as a result of the diversion was also Identified as a concern Water
discharged from McKusick Lake is carried through a combination of open channels and
pIpes between the McKusick Lake outlet and the St Croix River.
The Process
In order to try to develop recommendations having the support of the numerous parties affected,
the Stillwater CIty Counctl appomted a task force to guide this project. The McKusick Lake
Task Force met four times over a six-month penod. The members of the task force are lIsted
below.
Klayton Eckles
Jerry Fontaine
Nancy Brown
Chuck Fredrickson
Dick Jeans
Barb Cobb
Mark Doneux
Molly Shodeen
Mike Halvorson
City of Stillwater
Stillwater Planning Commission
Stillwater Parks and Open Space COmmIssion
McKusick Lake Association
McKuscik Lake ASSOCIation
Middle St Croix WMO
Washington Co. SWCD
MnDNR-Waters
MnDNR-Fisheries
A public meeting was also held to discuss the purpose of the study and ItS findmgs. The results
of the meetIngs With the Task Force and comments received at the pubhc information meeting
form the basIS for the recommendations presented in this report. Summaries of the meetings
with the Task Force as well as for the public meeting are contained in Appendix A of this report.
Analysis and Results
1. Review of existing data
MnDNR lake survey reports for McKusIck Lake for June, 1947 and June, 1958 characterized the
lake as a Type V (deepwater) wetland with a maxnnum depth of between 12.5 and 15.5 feet.
The reports note that over 80-90% of the lake has a depth of 4 feet or less. June water clarity
readmgs for both survey years ranged between 55 feet and 7.5 feet (1.7-2.3 meters). Emergent
and submergent aquatic plant growth were noted as abundant, although no problem algal blooms
were noted FIshenes data from the surveys indicated an abundance of sunfish and northern
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
pIke Stillwater CIty Attorney Dave Magnuson, who spent consIderable time on and around the
lake between 1946 and 1959, reported that the lake was known locally as a good fishery for
northern pike and that northems would swim through a culvert to reach the wetland north of the
lake for spawning (personal commumcatton to Sherri Buss).
In 1975, a study by Lake Management, Inc. of Marine on St Croix was completed for McKusick
Lake. The study mvolved an eXamInation of some phYSIcal, bacteriological, and chemical
charactenstics of the lake. The study noted that dense growths and dIe-backs of submerged
aquatic vegetation were apparently causmg very low oxygen conditions dunng both winter and
summer months In addition, the study concluded that the aesthetic and recreational qualities of
McKuSICk Lake were hmdered by the generallnsufficiency of make-up water from Brown's
Creek and the shallow depth of the lake. Among other recommendations, the study suggested
ralsing the normal water elevation of the lake and taking steps to assure a good circulation of
water from the northern end through the main body of the lake to its outlet in the southeast
corner.
Data collected on McKusIck Lake through the Metropolitan Council's Citizen Assisted
Monitoring Program (CAMP) program provides the best historical information on water
chemistry, water clarity, physical condition, and recreational swtability for the lake. This data
has been collected on a bi-weekly basis between late April and mid-October since 1994. It is the
only data set available for McKusick Lake that provides informatton on recreation season values
for the three key parameters -total phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and water clarity-most helpful m
assessing aesthetic and recreational sUltabIhty. Phosphorus concentrations are important because
the aVallability of thts plant nutrient often controls the amount of algae growth m an aquatic
ecosystem The amount of algal growth (expressed as chlorophyll "a" concentration) strongly
influences the clarity of the water Water clarity is a key physical parameter affecting user
perceptions of the suitabIlity of a lake for recreation. In general, higher phosphorus
concentrations cause more algal growth which decreases water clarity. As water clarity
decreases, human perceptIons of the suitability of the lake for recreational use also drop. Thus,
all three parameters provide 1IIlportant Information on the condition of a lake.
A summary of the data from McKusick Lake collected through CAMP is presented in Table 1.
In general, the data confirm that the lake supports a consIderable summertime algal population
that limIts its appeal for recreational use. Based on these data, the Met Council has assigned
overall lake water qualIty grades of "0" for 1994-96 and "C" for 1997 on an A-F scale
4
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2 Field Survey Fmdings
A field survey of the lake was conducted on October 15, 1998 by staff from BRA. The purpose
of the survey was to generate a hydrograpluc map of the lake showmg depth contours and assess
the type and relative abundance of submergent aquatic plant speCIes in the lake. The elevation of
the lake at the time of the survey was estimated at 852.7
Depth soundIngs along a senes of transects were compIled to generate a bathymetric map for the
lake (FIgure 1). Based on the results of this survey, approximately 80% of the surface area of the
46-acre lake is less than or equal to 5 feet in depth; the area of the lake greater than 10 feet deep
is only about 2 acres (Table 2). These extensive shallow depths suggest the potential for
extensive colonizatIon by emergent and submergent aquatic plants, dependIng on the clarity of
the overlymg water durmg the growing season
QualItative samplmg of submerged aquatic plants was also conducted at numerous sites
throughout the lake. The major submergent aquatic weed species found durmg the survey were
coontail (common), flatstem pondweed (abundant m spots), and largeleafpondweed (rare). All
are deSIrable native aquatic plants that perform valuable ecolOgical functions in a lake system,
although coontatl can reach nuisance levels in nutrient-enriched systems. Neither curly leaf
pondweed nor eurasian milfoil-both exotics that can be very dIfficult to control- were found
during the survey. Sparse growths of coontail were found as deep as 9 feet, although moderate
to heavy growth only extended down to depths of 6-7 feet. These observations confirm that
heavy aquatic plant growth in McKusick Lake occurs at depths up to twice the recreation season
mean water clarity value of 1.1 meters (3.5 feet).
Observations were also made regarding emergent growth in the lake. Yellow pond lily and
spatterdock - both floating emergents - were noted growmg to depths of 3-3.5 feet. Softstem
bulrush and cattail were observed growmg to maximum depths of 1.5-2 feet.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Year
1994
1995
1996
1997
Table 1. McKusick Lake Water Quality
AndPr~~nuwnDuaSummary
Phosphorus
(Ppb)
Water Clarity
(Meters)
Precipitation
(in.)
30.33
3755
2702
3742
All water quahty data presented are mean values for May - September penod
Water quality data from Met Council Citizen AssISted Momtonng Program (CAMP)
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
106
89
96.4
53
1.1
1 1
1.1
1.2
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
+
300
,
o 300 Feet
,
SIIIK\"iter
~>
I
Figure 1
McKusick Lake Analysis
and Management Plan
Lake Hydrographic Profile
Date of Survey 10-15-98
lake Water Elevation - 852 7
I \510\510gen\cad\rnk_1ake apr
.0 =roo
U=
EngIneers & AIdImlcrs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Table 2. McKusick Lake Bathymetric Profile
(Based on Field Survey Conducted 10-15-98)
Total Area of Lake 46 Acres
Area 5' or less in depth 36 acres (79%) *
Area 5'-10' deep 8 acres (17%) *
Area> 10' deep 2 acres (4%) *
* Acreage expressed as percentage of lake surface area
3. Modeling-Watershed Loadmg and Lake Response
a. Model Selection and Testtng
Computer model can help assess the effect of the proposed diversion on water quality In
McKusick Lake as well as provide the basIS for evaluattng the effectiveness of management
options. Two types of models were selected to carry out this task. The model PONDNET was
used to generate information on phosphorus and water loads from the watershed of McKusick
Lake under both the existIng (pre-diversion) conditions and the post-diversion condition. This
model IS endorsed by the Mn Pollution Control Agency for use in watersheds dominated by
urban land uses where phosphorus - the pollutant of primary concern for McKusick Lake - is
generated by runoff.
Outputs from the PONDNET model for phosphorus and water loading were then used as inputs
to a second modeling tool named the Wisconsin Lake Model Spreadsheet (WILMS). WILMS is
composed of 10 emplricallake response models that were developed using momtoring data from
various lakes throughout North Amenca, Canada, and northern Europe The lake models predIct
either spring overturn or growing season (May-September) in-lake total phosphorus
concentrations. The lake models mcluded in WILMS represent a cross-section of many lake
types and charactenstics, are commonly used today for lake management purposes, and have
been published in technical Journals.
PONDNET models were developed to reflect both existing and future (post-diversion) watershed
conditIons for McKusick Lake. Usmg preCIpItation data collected from a Stillwater site, annual
watershed loads for phosphorus and water were generated using the existing conditions
watershed model for each of the years with CAMP in-lake momtoring data. The in-lake
phosphorus concentrations predicted by each of the lake response models were then compared
with the momtored values for each year. The model also provided mformatIon to ascertain
Lake Assessment and Action Plan/or McKuslCk Lake 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
whether the mput parameters for McKusick Lake With regard to mean depth, phosphorus
loadmg, phosphorus concentration, flushing time, etc fit within an acceptable range for each
model.
Results showed that the key parameters for McKusIck Lake fell within acceptable limits for only
three of the 10 lake response models under both eXIsting and future watershed conditions Of
these three models, the Reckow AnOXIC Lake Model came closest to consistently predictmg in-
lake recreation season total phosphorus levels In McKusICk Lake for the 1994-1997 monitonng
penod. A comparison of modeled vs monitored results for this model is shown in Table 3.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuslCk Lake
9
---~~--------------
Table 3
McKusick Lake Model Calibration Results
Year
Monitored
May-Sept.
[Phosphorus]
(ppb)
1994
106
1995
89
1996
96.4
1997
53
McKuSlck Lake Calibration Summary
Modeled
May-Sept.
[Phosphorus]
(ppb)
%
difference
Precipitation
(in.)
109
-3
30.33
109
-22
3755
104
-8
27.02
105
-98
37.42
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Impact Analysis Results
Adaptation of the PONDNET models for both eXisting and future conditions utilized watershed
and pondmg data developed for the HydroCad model as part of the preparation of the AUAR.
This information was supplemented by data on wet pond volumes (Le. dead storage volumes) for
key lakes and ponds WIthm the watershed This information was generated through field checks
by City of Stillwater staff, lake bathymetric surveys, or record plans for constructed ponds
Where natural wetlands were known to have standing water but no other information was
aVaIlable, a mean depth of 1-2 feet was assumed, depending on the SIze and type of the wetland
For the purpose of analyzmg the Impact of the dtversion on water quahty in McKusick Lake,
preCIpItation data for the 1996 water year was used In the future condItion watershed analysis.
Examination of the existmg data indicates that 1996 IS a below average precIpitation year and
that in general, water quality m McKusICk Lake tends to be worse in years of below average
preCIpitation than in years of above normal precipitation. Thus, use of water year 1996
precipitation data was expected to provide a conservative estImate of the impacts of the dtversion
on McKusick Lake.
The pre- and post-diversIon watershed areas for McKusick Lake are shown in Figure 2. Under
existIng condItions, McKusick Lake has a total watershed area of approximately 940 acres
(McKusick Lake and Lily Lake drainage dIstnCts). Construction of the proposed dtversion
would mtroduce runoff to McKusick Lake from the Stillwater Drainage District south of County
Road 64 as well as the Long Lake Dramage District. As a result, the total watershed of
McKusick Lake would increase to over 4,200 acres A comparison of pre- and post-diversion
watershed loads and in-lake phosphorus concentrations for McKusick Lake is shown in Table 4.
In general, watershed modeling suggests that both phosphorus loading and water loading to the
lake would increase by around seven times as a result of the diversIon. The lake response model
indicates that the predicted total phosphorus concentrations m the lake after the diversion will be
100-110 ppb for a water year with precipitation like 1996. CAMP data collected for McKusick
Lake between 1994 and 1997 showed consistent water clartty readIngs of 1.1-1.2 meters over a
wide range of seasonal average in-lake phosphorus values (53-106 ppb) Assuming historical
relationships hold between in-lake total phosphorus concentrations and water clarity,
water clarity in the lake after the divenion should be similar to that before the divenion.
Further, the decrease in the time it takes for inflow water to completely replace the lake
volume (the "flushing" time) may help keep algal blooms in check.
Lake Assessment and Actlon Plan for McKusick Lake
11
-
--1
I
...........-.
LakeS
I
I
~
I
I
-
-
-
- -
".
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
---.I
--
-
-
StillwateIr Amllmexattnoml
Area AUAR
Watell'sDnedl Dll'UJmage
Districts
-+
2200 0
P- -I -od
2200 Feet
_ M..,
ILegelDlall
NDramap DJStnct
Dmmage Subchstnc:t
I\. / E.lastmg Long Lab DIstnc:t
NExuCmgPJpe
" " " Proposed PIpe
_Lab
DIstnct Pondmg
FI.pftl 2
J1j =aoo
II::. AndIrIIc:&
U ASIlldBIes
-..-
LI5IG15lllOZ1WATSIIBD Aft
-------------------
Table 4
Post-Diversion Lake Response
(Using 1996 Water Year PreCipitation Data)
Scenario Phosphorus Water Flushmg Modeled
Load Load Time In-Lake
(Ibs /yr) (acre-feetlyr) (days) Phosphorus
Concentration
(ppb)
1. Pre-Diversion 145 430 170 104
(Measured - 964)
2. Post-Diversion-AUAR Preferred Option (Lake NWL = 852)
2a No additional pondlng 990 3060 20 103
In Stillwater, Grant Tnshp
2b With addltonal pondlng 915 3060 20 95
In Stillwater, Grant Tnshp
3. Post-Diversion - High Lake Level Option (Lake NWL = 853)
3a No additional pondlng 1035 3060 20 109
In Stillwater, Grant Tnshp
3b With additional Pondlng 930 3060 20 99
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Management Options
A number of management options were considered by the Task Force for maintaimng/Improving
the phYSICal and recreational swtability of McKusick Lake as well as protecting other valuable
resources in the vicimty. For each management optIon, background Informatton on the option
was given as well as a description of advantages and dIsadvantages of pursuing that option Also
presented were an estimate of the costs of implementing the particular management optIon as
well as a list of the major assumpttons underlying the cost estimate. For the reader's reference,
opttons marked With an "*,, were those eventually recommended by the Task Force.
1. Maintain operating water levels in McKusick Lake and north wetland at same
elevation (AUAR Recommended Option)
Background: This was identified as the most feasible option m the AUAR and mvolved
operating both McKusick Lake and the north wetland at an elevation of 852. This
elevation is approximately 1.4 feet lower than the elevation at which the lake has been
operated since 1993 and about .3 feet lower than the elevation permitted by MnDNR.
The dike at the north end of McKusick Lake would be breached so that levels in the lake
and the wetland would be equal. This would permanently inundate approximately 17
acres of the 50 acre wetland immediately north of the lake. In order to provide adequate
protection to Brown's Creek, a dike and spillway would be constructed at the north end
of the wetland in order to contain the runoff for up to a 5-year precipitation event
Because of the low elevation of McKusick Road adjacent to the wetland, the road would
have to be raised to prevent frequent flooding
Advantages:
· Provides adequate protection to Brown's Creek so that development of the annexed
area can proceed.
· Allows use of the north wetland to prOVIde some treatment of diversion flows prior to
discharge to McKusick Lake.
. Has received agency approval.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Disadvantages:
· Control water level in McKusick Lake would be lowered below both permitted and
htstorical elevations
· May adversely Impact vegetative and habitat diversity m the north wetland
· Dike/spIllway construction at north end of wetland and raIsing of McKusick Road are
expenSIve.
· Wetland could eventually become a source of pollutants
Estimated costs:
DIke construction
Wetland mitigation
SpIllway construction
Elevation of McKusick Lake Road
Improvement of conveyance system
below McKusick Lake
TOTAL
$801,000
$211,000
$84,000
$195,700
$300,000
$1,591,700
Assumptions:
· Existing dtke at north end of lake would be breached.
. Spillway of new dike at north end of wetland would be set at 854.
. Existmg 21" outlet for McKuSICk Lake remams.
. A 1 5 cfs low flow bypass would be maintained to Browns Creek.
. Cost estimate for improvement of downstream conveyance system from City
engineering staff.
*2. Maintain operating water level in McKusick Lake at a higher elevation than that for
the north wetland.
Background: At the request of the Task Force, an effort was made to develop an option
which would meet the following obJectives.
. provide the same level of protection to Brown's Creek as the preferred option In
theAUAR,
. allow operation of McKusIck Lake at an elevation closer to that at which it has
been operated since 1993,
. preserve the integrity of the vegetation communIty m the north wetland.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This optton appears to balance these desIres It proposes that the control elevation of
McKusick Lake would be 853 and that the control elevation for the north wetland would
remain the same as It IS currently (850-851). This option also assumes that the existing
dIke between the north wetland and McKusick Lake would be raised and a spillway
would be installed to allow discharge of water from McKusIck Lake to the north wetland
under high flow conditions (FIgure 3) Modeling indicates that there are several
combmations of spillway elevatton and lake outlet sizes
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J ~ 5F/UWAy TO
~.~ Vf2ee1<-
~ (..ow f'OINT
1 tJ fLu AD
g;6 ~ -=r'
lNL,f>e
~~AD:l;f2.E:
-rn . .~ A-o. ,[
I _, \}.-:;:'" - I-J,h/ ~)
f8mhMIt.
~~
~ LOW l'DIN/
~ IN ~A(1)
~5q- 3 I
IN ~,.
~vrV~ 1V
Mct'<<~ ~
l=1l1~ a.
M~~~
;t'\ftN~~NI
om ON
~*
Low K6U.$5
8lbJA11t>N
<66-'. 1..'
. fl. Bonestroo
.... Rosene
-=- Anderlik &
1\]1 Associates
Eng,neers & Arch.tecU
-f
o
T'
N
w.'
l~
~ - 1'1: eoo'
~
'\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
that would allow runoff from events less than or equal to 5-year storm to be completely
contained within McKusick Lake (no discharge to Brown's Creek via the north wetland).
Further, the Task Force expressed a desire to contain the maXImum water level
fluctuation in McKusick Lake to about 2 feet and 3 feet above normal water level,
respectively, for 5-year and 100-year storm events. Based on survey and topographtc
data, the flood threat to structures around the lake should be mimmal with these water
level fluctuattons.
There are three structural components associated with thIs optIon (see FIgure 3) They
are as follows:
. The dIke between the lake and the north wetland. This dike would be raised in
order to prevent dishcharge of lake water to Brown's Creek for small
precIpitation events. The dike improvements would hkely be made to
accommodate a traIl. The extent of the dike improvements will depend on the
results of field investigations and the final outlet configuration for McKuSICk
Lake, which in turn depends in part on an evaluation of the conveyance
system below McKusick Lake
. The mlet structure from the Browns Creek channel m the north wetland to
McKusick Lake. This structure would convey diversion flows from the
channel to McKusIck Lake. It would also allow backflow from Mckusick
Lake toward the north wetland under flood conditions. Again, the cost of this
component will depend on soil conditions and the size of the structure needed.
. The mlet structure connecting the Brown's Creek dIverSIon channel to the
north wetland This structure would allow the option of bypassing a baseflow
to the wetland if desired and also serve as an overflow from the lake to the
wetland for runoff generated by storms greater than a 5-year event Agam, the
cost of the structure will be determined by the size required and soil
conditIons.
Because of the uncertaintIes, a range of costs and a contingency are included in the cost
estImates for this option
Table 5 compares Management Options 1 and 2 to each other With regard to the peak
flows, spill volume, and spill duration to Brown's Creek from the lake for 5-year and
1 DO-year events. Regardless of the assumed outlet configuration, Management Option 2
meets or exceeds the standard for protection of Brown's Creek set m the AUAR.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuslck Lake
18
-------------------
Table 5 - Comparison of McKusick Lake Management Options
Impacts to Browns Creek
(Based on E Peter's 2125/99 HydroCad model run)
Option Storm 24-hr. Spills to Browns Creek
Event Precip Depth from Mckusck Lake
Peak Flow Volume Duration
Rate Spilled of Spill
(cfs) (ac-ft ) (days)
Management Option 1
(Preferred Option in AUAR) 5-year 35" 0 0 0
1 OO-year 59" 35 312 45
Management Option 2
wI existing 21" outlet
5-year 3.5" 0 0 0
100-year 59" 34 273 4
Management Option 2
wI upgrade to 30" outlet
5-year 35" 0 0 0
1 OO-year 59" 22 116 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advantages:
. Brown's Creek WIll be protected to at least the same level as the preferred optIon m
the AUAR with respect to the peak rate, total volume, and duration of spIlls to the
creek from McKusIck Lake
. McKusIck Lake would be operated at a water level closer to that at whIch It has been
operated smce 1993
. There Will be a greater chance of preservmg and pOSSIbly even enhancmg the
desrrable vegetative and habItat diversIty m the north wetland.
Disadvantages:
. The north wetland can not be used to treat dIverSIOn water pnor to discharge to
McKusIck Lake
Estimated costs:
Rmse dtkehnstall spillway between
MckusIck Lake and north wetland
Install Inlet to wetland
Install inlet to McKusIck Lake
Improvement of conveyance system
downstream ofMcKusIck Lake
TOTAL
$40,000-100,000
$70,000-130,000
$70,000-130,000
Yet to be determined
Unknown at this tIme
Assumptions:
. McKusIck Lake structural control set at elevatIon of853.
. North wetland water level mamtamed SimIlar to eXIstmg
. Flood easements up to the 1 DO-year htgh water level for the lake would be donated to
the CIty by all npanan landowners at no cost.
. DetaIled evaluatIon of downstream conveyance system necessary before rehable cost
estImate can be generated
Lake Assessment and Action Plan for McKuszck Lake
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
*3. Construct detention basins in watershed as de11elopment proceeds
Background ConstructIon of wet detentIon basms m the upper watershed IS among the
most effectIve means to lDlmmIze pollutant loadIngs to McKuSICk Lake If deSIgned
properly, detentIon basms are capable of removmg 40-80% of the pollutants of greatest
concern commonly found m urban runoff. The CIty of Sttllwater has already cOmmltted
heaVIly to the use of detentIon basms that meet recogmzed standards for both rate control
and water quahty protectIon for pnvate developments as well as pubhc Improvements If
ponds of adequate deSIgn and SIze are reqwred as a conditIon of development, costs to the
CIty should be lDlntmal The AUAR contams recommendatIons for numerous ponds m
the post-dIversIon watershed, some of whtch have already been Installed. It Will be
Important to try to assure that JunsdIctIons WIthtn the watershed but outsIde the CIty of
StIllwater utIhze these treatment practIces as well
Advantages:
. Properly deSIgned wet detentIon basms are the most effectIve method of reducmg
urban runoff pollutant concentrations.
. If reqwred as a conditIon of development, the capItal costs are born by pnvate parties
. Ponds prOVIde both rate control and water qualIty benefits.
Disadvantages:
. The CIty of Sttllwater only has the authonty to requrre ponds In the portIon of the
watershed over whtch It has JunsdIctIon.
Costs:
Long-term mamtenance costs would likely be the responsIbIhty of the local
government JunsdIctIon WIthm which the ponds are located If the ponds are part
of a public utIhty system Costs dIfficult to estImate at thts time
Assumptions:
. CapItal costs ofpondIng WIll be born by private developers or those dIrectly benefited
by the project
Lake Assessment and Actzon Plan for McKuSICk Lake
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. Use wetland above McKusick Lake to protect lake water quality
Background: If the water level m the wetland north of McKusICk Lake is maintained at
the same or a htgher level than the lake (as proposed in Management Option 1), it could
be used to further treat diverted water prior to discharge to the lake. Wetlands have been
shown to be either sources or "smks" for nutrients, m large part dependmg on the history
of past pollutant loadmgs to the speCIfic wetland. Given the diverse vegetatIve
commumty found m thts wetland and the fact that the htstorical pollutant loads from the
Brown's Creek watershed have flowed through channels In the wetland With mmima1
dispersion, It IS hkely the wetland's nutrient assimilation capacity is relatIvely good at
this tIme However, continued high nutrient loadmgs in the future could change this
condition Thus, prOVIsions would need to be made to allow the option of dIverting flow
around the wetland directly to McKusick Lake to preserve the long term treatment
performance of the wetland whtle at the same time mmimizing recreation season water
quality impacts to McKusick Lake.
Advantages:
· Other than on-site ponding in upstream developing/developed areas, use of the
wetland could represent the most effective method of reducing incoming nutrient
loads associated with diverted water to McKusick Lake.
Disadvantages:
. Use of the wetland for nutrient attenuation of diverted flows could decrease
vegetative diVersIty.
· Over-Ioadmg the wetland's nutrient assimtlation capacity could change the wetland
from a sink to a source of nutrients in the future.
· Further field study is deSIrable to assess the current treatment potential of the wetland.
Future monitonng and active management of diversIon flows will be necessary to
preserve the wetlands treatment capability.
Estimated costs:
Assessment of current wetland condition (optional) $3,000
Construction of flow diversion structure $30,000
Future monitoring (optIonal) $1,500/year
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuSICk Lake
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Assumptions:
. Assessment of current wetland conditions confirms utility of wetland to act as
nutrIent trap.
. A swtable SIte for the diversIon structure can be found.
. DIversion flows can be dIspersed throughout the majority of the wetland Without
SIgnificant modifications within the wetland (ditchmg, dikmg, baffles, etc.)
. Thts option IS only feasIble if lake and wetland water levels are maintained as
proposed under Management Option 1
5. Dredge McKusick Lake
Background: The objectives of dredging the lake would be to provide enough deep
water to over-winter gamefish populations without supplemental aeration and to lower
the elevation of the lake bottom to preclude the formation of nwsance weed growths over
a majority of the lake surface area. The MnDNR's "rule of thumb" for overwintering
gamefish Without supplemental aeration IS that 25% of the lake area should be 14' or
deeper. To control nuisance weed growth to a desirable degree and still maintain
suffiCIent shallow water habitat, it is recommended that a total of 60% of the area be
below the photic zone (Le. deeper than 7 feet for McKusick Lake).
Advantages:
. Preclude the need for supplemental aeration to over-winter gamefish.
. Control and confine nUisance weed and emergent growth without addItional
management efforts.
. Could reduce or eliminate the need for road modifications and/or dIkIng if lower
normal lake control elevatIon could be accommodated whtle maintaimng sufficient
depth for the above.
Disadvantages:
. Costs are high
. Acceptability to agencies IS uncertain.
. Disposal SIte for the dredge material removed may be difficult to find
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Estimated costs
Dredgmg
MISC (sIte prep., dewatenng, enVIronmental
permIttIng/assessment, etc ) @ 15%
$2,200,000
$330,000
TOTAL
$2,530,000
Assumptions:
. Mechamcal dredgmg methods are used to remove 275,000 yds. @ $8/yd.
. DISpOSal SItes for dredge spoIls can be found wIthm several mIles of proJect area, no
land purchase for dtsposal of spOils necessary.
. No wetland mItigatIon reqUIred
· The photIc zone Will not mcrease after the dtversIon
*6. Improve recreation value and sport fishery of McKusick Lake
Background: There IS anecdotal eVIdence that McKuSICk Lake supported a stable and
VIable sport fishery when Brown,s Creek was connected to the lake. Regional fishenes
personnel and long-tIme reSIdents bebeve that the connection With the creek allowed fish
WIthm the lake to access htgher oxygen refuges-eIther m the wetland north of the lake or
m Brown's Creek ttself- that allowed overwmter survIval. Smce the construction of the
dtke separatIng Brown's Creek from the lake, fishmg qUalIty has dtmrmshed
substantIally It IS pOSSIble that re-estabhshment of thts connection as proposed for the
dtversIon could obVIate the need for supplemental aeratIon. InstallatIon of a pubhc
access With limIted parking would be reqUlred m order to secure asSIstance from the
MnDNR for lake fishenes management Surface use zoning by the CIty may also be
appropnate to bmlt the type of watercraft that can be used on the lake
Advantages:
. DeSIgnatIon of a sUltable pubhc access SIte would allow the CIty and/or reSIdents to
pursue MnDNR funds to help finance access Improvements and purchaseltnstallatIon
of an aeration system, If needed.
. Stockmg of sportfish by MnDNR could be carned out.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· McKusick Lake would become more of a local recreatIonal resource to both the
general pubhc and npanan land owners
Disadvantages:
· There are no obVIous good pubhc access sItes on the lake AdditIonal investIgatIon IS
needed (Note. One Task Force member suggested that the CIty-Owned parcel at the
southeast corner of the lake mIght make a SUItable access for a canoe access.)
· RIpman landowners would no longer have exclUSIve access to lake If the reqUIred
pubhc access IS Installed
Estimated costs:
Pubhc access
Aerator
$20,000-$30,000
$15,000-$40,000 capItal cost
$500-$1,000/yr for operatIon and
mamtenance
Assumptions:
· Access development costs are difficult to determine untIl a sIte IS chosen. The
estimate above does not mclude land acqUISItIon costs.
· Aerator costs assume an electnc portable or buned pump and baffle aeratIon system
and that power IS avaIlable nearby
7. Manage weeds through mechanical harvesting
Background Based on htstoncal water clmty readings and With the current lake bottom
elevatIon configuratton, over 80% of McKusICk Lake could support rooted weed growth
Whtle the maxrmum depth of colomzatIon by weeds was found to be about 9 feet In the
October, 1998 lake survey, nUIsance growths are lIkely to occur In depths of 7 feet or
less, assuming no sIgmficant change m water clmty. There IS no eVIdence of exotIc weed
speCIes In the lake, so control efforts would be atmed at nUIsance levels of natIve speCIes
(pnmmly coontatl) Current permtttIng reqUIrements by MnDNR would hmtt the area of
the lake that could be harvested to no more than ~ the httoral zone or about 22 acres of
the 46 acre lake.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuslCk Lake
25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advantages:
. Harvestmg IS a more enVIronmentally sound method of weed control than the use of
herbIcIdes
Disadvantages:
. No access to the lake for a harvester eXIsts currently A SUitable access would need to
be Installed
. Too much weed removal could allow prolIferatIon of bloom algal speCIes to
dommate, causmg a decrease m water clarity and possibly makmg the lake less able
to support a sportfish populatIon.
. Coontall, one of the dommant weed speCIes m the lake, can be dIfficult to control
With harvestmg because It becomes detached eastly from the bottom under some
condttIons
Estimated Costs:
ConstructIon of landmg
Harvestmg ($400/ac. for 22 acres/yr.)
$20,000-$30,000
$8,800/yr
Assumptions:
. No land acqUiSItIon costs mcluded
8. Use temporary winter water level drawdown to control aquatic plants
Background: Wmter water level drawdowns have been shown to be effectIve m
controllmg some types of rooted aquatIc weeds, especIally exotIcs such as curly leaf
pondweed and eurasIan rmlfotl The current outlet configuratIon would allow a
drawdown to an elevatIon of about 1 5 feet below the permitted water elevatIon of the
lake (852.3). GIven the SIze of the post-dIversIon watershed, It IS unlIkely that the lake
would reqUIre more than 1-2 weeks to re-fill m the spring after drawdown, even m dry
years.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuszck Lake
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Advantages:
. The small drawdown allowed by the current outlet configuratIon IS mexpenSIve.
. Control most likely for weeds WIth well-developed root systems
Disadvantages:
. May encourage addItIonal encroachment of cattaIls mto open water
. Drawdown as a control strategy for coontaIl, the dommant weed speCIes m the lake at
the tIme of the October 1998 lake survey, may not work partIcularly well because of
coontall's abIhty to detach from bottom substrate
Estimated costs:
Meetmgs and permtttmg
<$500
Assumptions:
. Controllmg factor m determmmg the maxImum drawdown IS the concrete SIll of the
outlet structure m front of the outlet pIpe.
. One pubhc meeting reqUIred/deSIrable for pubhc reVIew of optIon
*9. Improve shoreline management.
Background: ThIS element would be aImed at promotmg the estabhshment of upland
buffers extendIng back 20-30 feet from the water's edge whtle stIll allowmg for access to
the lake for nparlan landowners. Only about 20% of the shorelme exhtbIts undesirable
shorelme management practIces (I.e. turf grass to water's edge). The shorehne
stabtlization benefits of thts management Item become Increasmgly more important as
water levels m the lake are raIsed htgher and/or fluctuate more
Advantages:
. RIparian fishlW1ldhfe habItat and shorelIne stabihzatIon would be Improved.
. Incremental step m encouragmg enVIronmentally-fnendly nparian property
management
. Low cost.
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuslck Lake
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Disadvantages
· Would have neglIgible Impact m Improvmg water qUalIty m lake
Estimated Costs:
OrgamzatIon/solIcItatIon of volunteers
Plantmg deSIgn (4 hrs / lot for 15 lots)
Cost-share ($200/lot for 15 lots)
Inspection and documentation
$2,000
$4,500
$3,000
$700
TOTAL
$10,200
Assumptions:
· Lake assocIation SOhCItS partICIpatIon, one general orgamzatIonal meetIng necessary
. Landowners or volunteers Install plant matenal
*10. Pursue non-structural methods to reduce pollutant loadings to lake.
Background: Non-structural optIons such as spnng and fall street sweepmg and publIc
educatIon are usually key components of lake water quahty management programs.
Spnng street sweepmg efforts are usually mtended to reduce the amount of matenal
accumulated over the wmter that IS carned m runoff to lakes, whtle fall sweeping IS
mtended to mtercept leave lItter PublIc education IS deSIgned to promote recogmtIon of
the dtrect connection between storm dramage systems and lakes EducatIon is also
mtended to promote understandmg by the target audtence of how to keep pollutants such
as vegetatIve matenal, phosphorus-contaInmg fertthzers, and chermcal wastes off hard
surfaces and out of storm drainage systems feedmg a lake The most cost-effective
efforts are directed at those areas that discharge dtrectly to the water body of concern
These areas typIcally generate the greatest loadings per unIt area m the watershed and
reSIdents wIthm the areas are usually more attuned to the condttIon of the resource and
therefore more receptIve to the educatIon message However, documented reductIons m
pollutant loadings as a result of pubbc educatIon and street sweeping are lackIng. In
addttton, the phosphorus load contnbutton from the dtrect dramage of McKuSICk Lake IS
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuslCk Lake
28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
expected to very small compared to the load entering the lake from other areas of the
watershed.
Advantages:
. Could be relatIvely mexpensIve If focused on the duect drainage of the lake and
combmed wIth eXIstIng programs for sweepmg and/or publIc educatIon on other
enVlronmentalIssues
. Would raise the general envIronmental awareness of watershed reSIdents and proVIde
means to help contnbute to lake protectIon.
. May help to prevent or slow future degradatIon of lake
Disadvantages:
. Would be unlIkely by Itself to achIeve suffiCIent reductIons m pollutant loadIngs to
cause any demonstrable Improvement m water qUalIty m McKusICk Lake.
. Watershed-wIde educatIon efforts Will get more expensIve, more lOgistIcally
complex, and perhaps less effectIve the further from the resource the effort IS
extended.
Estimated costs (annual costs):
Street sweepmg (annual expendtture)
EducatIon brochure (development/dtstnbutIon)
Catch baSIn stenCIlIng
$3,000
$500
$2,000
Assumptions:
. All actIvittes carned out m the McKuSICk Lake dIrect drainage only.
. Street sweepmg actIVItIes are carned out m spnng and fall (5 curb rmles @ $300/curb
rmle twIce per year).
. MN Department of Agnculture matenals modtfied for McKuSICk Lake by DOA staff.
. PublIc educatIon matenals mailed once per year m spring to 250 reSIdences
. Stenctls, door hangers, and other supplIes purchased, apphcatIon/dtstnbutton by
volunteers
Lake Assessment and Actzon Plan for McKuslck Lake
29
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Enhancement of Downstream Conveyance System
Another Important Issue IdentIfied by the task force was the evaluatIon and modIficatIon of the
conveyance system below McKuSICk Lake Water dIscharged through the outlet m the southeast
corner of McKuSIck Lake must travel almost a mIle through a combmatIon of pIpe and open
channels before It reaches Its eventual discharge pomt to the St CrOIX River (FIgure 4) At
present, a httle less than half the length of thts conveyance system IS enclosed m pIpe. Even
under eXIstmg condItIons, portIons of the open channel below Everet Street are already
moderately to severely eroded and local floodmg problems have been reported further
downstream. The diverSIon of additIonal flow through McKuSICk Lake Will mean that thts
conveyance system Will carry lligher flows on a more frequent basIS than It has m the past. WIth
thIs change, the seventy of eroSIOn and flooding problems wIllmcrease WIthOut modification of
the conveyance system The Improvements for the downstream system would be recommended
regardless of whtch of the lake level management optIons presented preVIously IS selected
A detailed evaluatIon of thts system was beyond the scope of thIs report However, the task
force felt It extremely Important to address thts Issue m a future investIgatIon based on the
followmg.
. PreventIon of channel erOSIon IS necessary to prevent future mamtenance
Issues for the CIty and protect the qUalIty of the water discharged to the St
CroIX River.
. The flow capaCIty of the downstream system must be adequate to prevent
property damage assocIated With floodmg
. Work m the ravme could mclude constructIon of a trail through the raVine to
connect With the CIty'S trails at McKusIck Lake
Recommendations
On January 28, 1999, the McKusIck Lake Task Force met to tentatIvely select the management
optIons to recommend to the CIty CounCIl. These management optIons were reVIewed With the
potentIally affected reSIdents at a publIc mformatIon meeting held on Thursday, January 25,
1999 Input receIved at that meeting supported the Task Force recommendatIons.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuslck Lake
30
- --
12!<v'ING ~E.?
fLowff-Otvv
,PAu~?'6f- ~
10 ~ Cfol~
1==1f?l~ +
fuW6 11-oM
,Mo~~l~ ~ to
"11te ~(: Cft>l~
-------
o Ff:t'J
~Na..
"I
w.'
...
+ ',0 i {fJOO
o 12.00 r
SCX\..6 - ,1/ -:;::. "06'
. fl. Bonestroo
.... Rosene
R Anderlik &
1\11 AssOCIates
engIneers & ArchItects
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Task Force therefore recommends the folloWing management options for McKuslCk Lake:
Recommendation 1: Maintain the water level elevation in McKusick Lake at a higher level
than that in the north wetland. The water level elevation for McKusick Lake should be set
no lower than 853 feet.
Rationale: MamtaIning the water level of McKusICk Lake at the highest reasonable level was a
top prionty of the lakeshore owners represented on the Task Force ThIS optlon IS also the best
for preserving the ability of the large wetland north of the lake to support a diverse vegetatlve
community. Most importantly, It is feaSIble to design thts option so that Browns Creek is
protected to the same or hIgher level as m the AUAR preferred option.
Recommendation 2: Evaluate and develop strategy to modify downstream channel below
McKusick Lake to accommodate increased Dows.
Rationale. The dIverSIOn will increase the peak flows, volumes, and duration of discharges
released from McKusick Lake to the downstream ravme and conveyance system southeast of the
lake. While a detailed evaluation of this portIon of the system was beyond the scope of thts
study, modificatlon of the conveyance system below the lake will be needed to prevent eroSIon in
the ravine and rout the water safely through the CIty Without raising the potentlal for flooding.
Recommendation 3: Construct detention basins in the watershed as development proceeds.
Rationale. Properly designed wet detention basins are among the most effective tools to reduce
pollutant loadIngs from developed areas. These basins should be constructed by developers as
part of the cost of mitigatIng Off-SIte impacts of each development. It is essentlal to try to assure
that jurisdictions throughout the watershed-both within and outside the City of Stillwater-utilize
these practlces to mmImIze the impacts of development on downstream resources
Lake Assessment and ActIOn Plan for McKuS1Ck Lake
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recommendation 4: Improve the fishery and provide public access. This should include
adoption of a City ordinance to prohibit use of gasoline moton on McKusick Lake,
installation of a public canoe landing at the existing park area on the southeast comer of
the lake, construction of a fishing pier, stocking of gamefish, installation of a winter
aeration system (if needed). Consider development of trails that will connect McKusick
Lake area with other parts of the City.
Rationale: Riparian landowners have expressed to the City a desire to at least maintain the
recreatIOnal SUItability of McKusick Lake in the future. This optIon has the potentIal to enhance
the recreatIonal value of the lake. Any conumtment of state resources to assist in thIs
management effort is, however, contingent on installation of a pubhc access that would allow the
public to use the lake for the same recreational purposes as riparian owners.
Recommendation 5: Improve shoreline management. At a minimum, the lake association
and the City should develop a shoreline management demonstration area along the
shoreline of the City-owned land near the lake outlet.
Rationale. The dIversion Will cause water levels in the lake to be higher and stay up longer m
response to runoff events than it has historically. ThIs conditIon is likely to increase the potential
for shoreline erOSIon, especially in those areas where maintained turf grass extends down to the
shoreline Operating the lake at a higher normal water elevation IS likely to increase this
potential. One way of stabiliZing shoreline areas is to establish a community of native long-
stemmed, deep rooted grasses that can Withstand periodic inundation. Development of a
demonstration area on the lake would be a good way of promoting the benefits of such a practice
to shoreline owners
Recommendation 6: The City, lakeshore, and watenhed residents should adopt non-
structural methods of protecting water quality, such as improved street sweeping, public
education, etc.
Rationale. These practIces are important because they are intended to reduce at the source the
pollutants that can degrade lake water quality and they are relatively mexpensive to carry out.
They are most effective when used In combInation With other practices such as detentIon basIns,
etc.
Lake Assessment and ActIon Plan for McKuslck Lake
33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McKusick Lake Study Task Force
Tuesday, November 17,1998
2 to 4 p.m.
Stillwater City Hall
Lower Level Meeting Room (near Police Offices)
Agenda
I. Introductions
. Task Force Members
. Study Process and Objectives (Attachment)
II. McKusick Lake Existing Conditions and Water Quality Model
Rich Brasch, watershed and lake specialist at Bonestroo & Associates
will present information gathered during his recent lake survey, other
existing information, and water quality model information for
McKusick Lake and its watershed. Task Force members will discuss
this information and present any additional information that they have
for the study.
III. Next Steps and Set Next Meeting
IV. Adjourn
If you have questions about the meeting or agenda, please call Sherri Buss at
604-4758. See you on the 17th!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl.6(;)
iVlcKusick Lake Task Force
November 17, 1998
Stillwater City Hall
Meeting Summary
PRESENT: Dick Jeans, Chuck Frederickson, McKusick Lake Association, Barb Cobb,
Middle St CroIX WMO, Jerry Fontaine, Stillwater Planwng Commission, Klayton
Eckles, Sean Sanders, CIty of Stillwater; Molly Shodeen, MIke Halvorsen, Minnesota
DNR, Nancy Brown, StIllwater Parks CommIssion, RIch Brasch, Bonestroo &
AssocIates
By: Sherfl Buss, Bonestroo & AssocIates
I. Introductions-Task Force and Project
Task Force members introduced themselves. Chuck requested that a list of members and
theIr phone numbers be proVIded to the group. ThIS WIll be included in the mailmg for
the next meetmg
Sherfl noted that the goals of the study are the following.
· IdentIfy and analyze the current status of the lake
· Identify and analyze changes that will occur With Implementation of the
Stillwater AUAR and the dIversion of stormwater to McKusick Lake
· Identify actions that could be taken to maintain or Improve the health of the
Lake, and analyze their hkely costs and benefits
· Make a recommendation to the City Council regarding actIons to be taken to
protect or improve the status of the lake.
Chuck noted that the McKusick Lake Homeowners petitioned the City CouncIl to
complete this study to specifically examine issues related to the lake level He indicated
that lake residents are opposed to returning the lake to ItS permttted water level.
(Background-the Normal Water Level of McKusick Lake was set at 852 3 feet In 1981
when the outlet was constructed at the east end of the lake. The average level of the lake
during the 1970's and 1980's was 851.8 feet, with a variation of about .5 feet Around
1993 the level of the lake was raised to 853 5 feet, in violation of the DNR permit for the
lake
The DNR has indicated that the lake level needs to be restored to the Normal Water
Level, 852.3 feet. The Stillwater AUAR proposed that the Normal Water Level for the
lake be set at 852 feet, so that the lake could help to hold additIonal stormwater diverted
to protect Brown's Creek. The watershed modeling completed for the AUAR Indicated
that during normal years, the actual operating level of the lake would be close to 853 feet,
because it will take a week or more for stormwater from each storm event to flow from
the large watershed area and clear the constricted outlet at the east end of the lake. The
Lake Association favors keeping the lake at its current level, 853.5)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II. McKusick Lake Existing Conditions and Modeling
Rich Brasch summarized existmg InfOrmatIon avaIlable for Lake McKuslck
Depth profile: about 80 percent of the lake IS five feet deep or less. based on mformation
gathered m a field survey from 10/15/98 There is one deep "hole" approximately 17 feet
deep The depth profile will be important later in the study as we analyze water turnover
m the lake
Aquatic plant community (aquatic macrophytes): major plant speCIes Identified m the
field suney were coontaIl and \Vater cabbage No invasIve exotIC speCIes such as
euraSIan water mtlfoil, curly pond weed or purple loosestnfe were found m the survey.
The lake clanty IS approximately 3 feet, and plants usually grow out to approxImately 2
times thts depth In McKusick major plant growth occurs out to a water depth of about 7
feet Most of the lake has a peat bottom
Coontail is a valuable plant from a water quality perspectIve It competes directly with
algae for nutrients (such as phosphorus), so abundant coontail In the lake helps to reduce
potential algae populations. Aquatic plants help to stabilize the lake bottom and the
shorehne. Water cabbage is partIcularly valuable m providmg fish habitat.
As aquatic plants dIe and accumulate at the bottom, they accumulate at a rate of3-15 mm
per year. This process occurs in all lakes. Lake reSIdents noted that at tImes during the
summer, pondweed floats to the surface and mats move on the surface of the lake
Water quality data: Water quality data collected by the Metropolitan Council indicates
that McKusIck lake has a rank of C/O for most years.
It is possible that If water qUalIty Improves, lake clarity will Increase, and aquatic plants
Will colonize the lake to deeper levels
Rich noted that during 1997, a very high precipitation year, the water clanty m McKusick
Lake was substantially higher values in average years. This may indIcate that a higher
level of flushing will help to improve lake quality. Rich reviewed similar lakes in Eagan
that may provide clues to how management actions may affect McKusick Lake. He
noted similarities to Blackhawk Lake, which also has a large watershed and high amount
of phosphorus movmg through the system However, on thts lake the high level of
flushtng combIned with aquatIc plant harvesting have helped to maintain relatIvely high
water qualIty.
Watersbed conditions: The current watershed area for McKuSICk Lake IS 1100 acres
When the diversion strategy is implemented, the watershed will increase to
approximately 4600 acres, a watershed. lake ratio of80:1.
Committee members discussed the watershed area and relationship of impervIOUS surface
and land uses to water quality Members noted the old city dump SIte southwest of the
lake that drains to It This area IS currently being studied to identify potential problems.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Members revIewed the diversIon strategy proposed In the AUAR, and changes m water
movements proposed through McKuSICk Lake
Rich descnbed the modeling that wIll be completed for McKusICk Lake, to assess the
Impacts of the diversIOn on lake water quality The results of the modeling will be
aVaIlable at the next meeting of the Task Force.
Molly provIded maps and fishenes data from 1958 and 1947 Duane Shodeen, Metro
DNR Fishenes, revIewed this data and suggested that It indIcates that the water from
Browns Creek flOWing through McKusick Lake (before the current dIke was constructed)
helped to aerate the lake and allow fish to survIve the winter. The fisheries data may
indicate that aeratIon IS a strategy that would Improve the health of McKusick Lake and
allow re-estabhshment of game fish populations.
III. Options for Lake Management
Rich revIewed the options to be considered for lake management in this study:
Dredging
Plant community and shoreline management
Selective harvesting to manage aquatic plants
Temporary winter water level drawdown to manage aquatic plants
Improvement of the fishery
Aeration of the wetland above the lake to Improve water quality
RaIsing the control water elevation of the lake (Including looking
At changes to the outlet at the east end of the lake)
Non-structural options to reduce pollutant loading
Detention basin requirements in developing portions of the watershed
Chuck suggested that a cost estImate for dredging the whole lake be obtained, as well as
for portions of the lake. Committee members agreed, but noted that the costs are likely to
be very high Other optIons that are partIcularly important to the lake association
members include raIsing the control water elevation and detention basin requirements.
Klayton asked the group to support a letter to the Minnesota DNR requesting a delay in
returning the lake to its Normal Water Level untIl this study is completed (approximately
March, 1999). The DNR had sent a letter to the City in October requtring an immediate
return to the NWL Task Force members supported a delay, so that the Task Force can
complete its work and develop recommendatIons regarding lake levels and other
management options.
IV. Next Meeting
The Task Force set ItS next meeting for Tuesday, January 12, from 2 to 4 p m at
Stillwater CIty Hall Thts will allow time to complete the watershed modelling, and for
analysis of the management optIons These items will be the focus of the next meeting
agenda The meeting adjourned at 4.00 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McKusick Lake Study Task Force
Tuesday, January 12, 1999
2 to 4 p.m.
Stillwater City Hall
..
Lower Level Meeting Room (near Police Offices)
Agenda
1. Introductions
II. Results of Water Quality Modelling
Rich Brasch will present a summary of modeling that will describe the
impact of the planned diversion on the water quality ofl\IcKusick
Lake. The summary w1l1 be useful for evaluatIng lake management
options.
III. Options for Lake Management
A draft outline of the options we discussed at the last meeting is
attached. The outline describes the options, their costs, advantages
and disadvantages. Bonestroo staff will present the options for
discussion by Task Force members.
IV. Next Meeting
Task Force members will identIfy additional information or analysis
needed for the next meeting. Agenda for February meeting will
include additional discussion of the options (if needed) and
development of recommendations.
V. Adjourn
If you have questions about the meeting or agenda, please call Sherri Buss at
604-4758. See you on the 12th!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McKusick Lake Task Force
Tuesday, January 12,1999
Stillwater City Hall
Meeting Summary
Present: Jerry Fontame, Stillwater Plannmg COmmISSIOn, Barb Cobb, Middle St. CroIx
WMO, Chuck Fredenckson, DICk Jeans, McKusIck Lake ASSocIatIon, Molly Shodeen,
MIke Halvorsen, Minnesota DNR; Mark Doneux, Washmgton SWCD, Nancy Brown,
Stillwater Parks ConumsslOn, Rich Brasch, Mark Hanson, Bonestroo & AssocIates
By: Shem Buss, Bonestroo & Associates
I. Background
Sherri revIewed the storm water diversion through McKusIck Lake that was adopted as a
part of the Stillwater ADAR. Under this strategy the proposed Ordinary HIgh Water
Level for McKuSICk Lake was proposed to be 852'. (The DNR's permItted OHWL for
the lake IS 852.2'. The current lake level IS in VIolation of the permitted level, at 853.5' )
II. New Option for McKusick Lake Level
Mark Hanson presented a new optIon for the storm water dIversion that would allow the
OHWL to be set at 853' .
· This optIon mcludes mcreasing the existing dike to 856.5', mamtaining the existmg
separation and variation In water levels between the lake and its wetland.
· The optIon would run storm water flows from the diversion through McKusick Lake
up to a 3", 5-year storm event, protecting Browns Creek to the same degree as
proposed In the AUAR diversion option
· In larger storm events, some flow would be drrected to the wetland. Additional
analysis is needed to determine the SIze of these flows.
· The current outlet at the east end of the lake would be maintained at 21".
· McKusick Lake would bounce approximately 3 feet durIng the 3" stonn event.
The Task Force members raised the followmg questIons regarding the new option:
· The degree of bounce during storm events IS a concern, particularly for homes on the
southeast part of the lake. The potential for flooding in thIS area should be
determmed, and dIscussed With property owners. (The AUAR diversion option
proposed a 2.5' bounce startmg from a lake level at 852', thts option includes a 3'
bounce from a normal water level of 853' )
Members asked about the current bounce on the lake dunng storm events. The
bounce is currently about 1 to 1 5'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· The bounce may also be a concern for wIldlife haBitat' DNR WIldlife staffare
concerned about a 3-foot bounce during a lOO-year event, and may be more
concerned about this occurrmg more frequently
However, thIS option protects the habitat values of the wetland to the north of the lake
to a greater degree than does the AUAR diversion optIon The wetland provides a
greater dIversIty and hIgher qUalIty of habItat than the lake. The whole set of
tradeoffs with other options should be evaluated
· If the City determmes that thts option is feasible, and Wishes to request that the
OHWL of the lake be changed to 853' , It Will need sIgned agreements from each of
the landowners around the lake that they are Willing to donate the shoreland to allow
the lake level to rIse. The DNR and CIty should determme whether an easement IS
needed to the Ordmary High Water Level, or the High Water Level during 100 year
storm events. All landowners will need to agree to donate the easement for this
optIon to be feasIble.
· DNR staff from Fish, Wildlife, and Waters diVISIons need to determine the
acceptabIlIty of thts option, and whether the agency agrees that it provides the same
level of protection to Brown's Creek as the AUAR. PotentIal changes to the wetland
under the AUAR dIversion option were a DNR concern--the new option has
advantages because it causes less change m wetland communities.
· Members asked whether outflow from the lake could be increased to decrease the
potential bounce The model for this option was run With an mcrease in outlet size
from 21" (current) to 27", but thts dId not affect the bounce. Thts issue will be
exammed further
Task Force members agreed that the option is an interesting one, and that additional work
should be completed on Issues identified above.
ID. Water Quality Issues
Rich Brasch discussed his work since the last meeting to identify a lake water quality
model that fits McKuslck Lake. A model with good reliabilIty has been identified, and
has been run for the current situation, AUAR dIversion, and New option (descnbed
above).
The model indicates the following:
· m-Iake phosphorus levels after either of the diverSIon options will be within the range
that the lake has experienced under current condItIons:
· the flushmg tIme for the lake Will be dramatically reduced when a diversion is
Implemented, and thIS WIll counter the additional phosphorus that will be transported
to the lake With additional storm water;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· addItIonal ponding m the annexation area and in City of Grant WIll help to reduce the
phosphorus loads to McKusick Lake
IV. Options for Lake Management
The Task Force will discuss the nine options for lake management outlined in the packet
at Its next meeting.
Klayton Eckles suggested that the costs for dredging assumed in the optIons is too low-
the City Will need to transport the matenal away from the lake, and this will add costs.
v. Next Meeting
The Task Force will meet on Thursday, January 28, from 2 to 4 p m. at Stillwater City
Hall The agenda Will focus on the options for lake management, and any additional
Information on diversion options.
Public Meetings. The work plan for the study indicates that the City will hold two
publIc meetmgs to discuss the work of the Task Force. The Task Force recommended
that the frrst of these be held during February, so that lake residents and others can
comment on the optIons the Task Force is considering. The final meeting will be held at
the end of the study to report the Task Force recommendations.
The Task Force adjourned at 4 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McKusick Lake Study Task Force
Thursday, January 28, 1999
2 to 4 p.m.
Stillwater City Hall
Lower Level Meeting Room (near Police Offices)
Agenda
1. New Lake Management Alternative-Further Analysis
· Strategy to reduce lake "bounce" during storms
II. Options for Lake Management
A draft outline of the options to be discussed was included in the last
meeting packet. We will use this outline for the discussion. The
outline describes the options, their costs, advantages and
disadvantages. Bonestroo staff will present the options for discussion
by Task Force members.
III. Task Force Discussion of Lake Management Options
· Identify any that need further analysis
· Identify which should be considered further for recommendation to
the City
· Identify priorities
IV. Next Meeting
v. Adjourn
If you have questions about the meeting or agenda, please call Sherri Buss at
604-4758. See you on the 12th!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-McKusick Lake Task Force
January 28,1999
Stillwater City Hall
Meeting Summary
Present: Nancy Brown, StIllwater Parks CommtssIon, MIke Halvorson, Molly Shodeen,
Mmnesota DNR, DIck Jeans, Chuck Frederickson, McKuslck Lake AssocIation; Jerry
Fontame, Stillwater Plannmg CommIssion; Klayton Eckles, Stillwater Pubbc Works,
Rich Brasch, Shem Buss, Bonestroo & AssocIates
I. New Lake Management Alternative--Further Analysis
Rich Brasch of Bonestroo & Associates summarized the alternatIve management strategy
presented at the earber Task Force meeting in January. Rich noted that the alternative
has been modified to allow a mmtmum flow (1 5 cfs) to eIther the McKusick wetland or
Brown's Creek. Modellmg of this modificatIon mdicates that the "bounce" m McKusick
Lake during storm events Will be reduced to 1 8 to 2.3 feet, dependmg on the SIze of the
event. Sherri noted that bypassing the flow to the wetland will be desuable to sustaIn the
current condItIons and communItIes in the wetland.
Rich provided a summary of the new management option, and its conditions during 5-
year and 1 DO-year storm events
· Chuck Frederickson asked if mcreasing the size of the pipe at the McKusick Lake
outlet would help to reduce the bounce durmg storm events. Rich noted that the
engineers have IndIcated that this will not have much effect on the bounce, and may
have negative effects on the raVIne downstream from the lake Chuck indicated that
thts will probably be a question at the pubbc meetIng, and a clear explanation should
be prOVIded to area residents
· Molly Shodeen noted that the DNR favors adequate detention time in McKusick Lake
and upstream to remove phosphorus before storm water enters the St. Croix River.
· Jerry Fontaine asked if additIonal pondmg is possible in the ravine downstream from
McKusICk. Klayton indicated that the narrowness, steepness, and grades in the ravine
make this unhkely
. Rich noted that the elevation at the top of the existing McKusick Lake outlet is
855 3' Thts is the level the lake would reach In a 100 year storm event under the
new management optIon. CIty of Stillwater staff will be surveying the elevations of
eXIsting home on the southeast part of the lake (lowest home elevations around the
lake). InformatIon on how the new option and project bounce will affect these
properties will be aVailable at the public meeting
. RIch reVIewed the cost estimates for implementing the new option m comparison to
those calcuated for the AUAR. (Those for the new optIon are more preliminary than
those available for the AUAR.) The estImates indIcate that the new option will cost
about the same or less than the AUAR optIon
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Chuck FrederIckson noted that if new matenalIs added to the dIke, it could affect the
depth of the lake near the dIke, which is already shallow. He suggested that
homeowners m this area may request that dredgmg occur along the dIke if thIS IS
proposed Rich indIcated that there may be negatIve aspects of dredging m this area.
The emergent vegetatIOn there provIdes good habItat, and will help to protect the lake
from sedImentation If new matenal is added to the dike.
· Molly Shodeen provided lugh-qUalIty aenal photos of the wetland along ItS western
boundary The photos indicate areas where water moves across the existing spoil
areas along the shoreline, and that the southwestern portion of the wetland IS much
wetter than other areas
· Rich noted that the costs shown do not mdicate costs for developing a trail along the
west SIde of the wetland, but are minimums for evaluatmg this option.
. Jerry Fontaine asked If neighbors along the raVIne south of McKusick Lake will be
notified of the publIc meeting, If changes are contemplated as a part of implementing
the new management option Klayton mdicated that potentIal changes in the ravine
are so tentative that It is not necessary to notIfy raVIne neighbors at this tIme.
· Molly noted that the process for changmg the Normal Water Level of McKusick Lake
to 853' wIll include the following. The City needs to apply to the DNR to amend Its
current pennlt and change the lake level. She indicated that the Wildlife and
FIshenes DIVIsions have mdicated that they do not see a problem with allowmg this
change
In order to apply for the amended permit, the CIty of Stillwater will require that each
reSIdent along the lakeshore be willing to donate an easement to the City up to the
100 year hIgh water level, so that the new level IS not a ''taking'' of private property.
The CIty will probably not be wIlling to purchase easements from lakeshore reSIdents
This information Will be presented to lakeshore reSIdents at the public meeting.
II. Options for Water Quality Management
Task Force members reviewed the eight options proposed at the last meeting that may
help to improve water quality in McKusick Lake. They determined that the following
should be recommended to the City as feasible and beneficial:
#1 Construction of detention basins m the watershed with new development
#4 Improvement of the fishery and public access
. Develop a public canoe landmg at the existing park area The City could
seek funding from the DNR to develop a public access.
. Develop a kids fishing pIer, and stock the lake to provide fishing
OpportunItIes (DNR funds may also be available to develop a fishing pier.)
. The CIty should adopt an ordmance prolubitmg the use of gasoline motors,
mcludmg Jet skiis, on McKusick Lake
. The City should work with the DNR to determme whether an aeration
system is needed on the lake to support a sport fishery.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
#7 The Lake AssociatIon and Cify' snould develop a Shoreline Management
demonstration area along the shoreline of the park near the lake outlet. FundIng
to assist With a demonstratIon proJect may be available from the DNR
#8 The City, lakeshore and watershed reSIdents should adopt nonstructural (also
called "housekeepmg") methods such as Improved street sweeping, pubhc
educatIon, etc to Improve lake quality.
The other four options were discussed. The Task Force determined the following:
#2 ModIfication of the wetland above McKusick Lake. ThIS option is not applicable
under the new option that keeps the wetland and lake at different levels.
#3 Dredgmg. This optIon IS not needed if the lake level is maintained at 853' under
the new option
#5 Mechanical harvesting to manage weeds. ThIs optIOn may not be needed if the
lake level IS maintained at 853' under the new option Could be considered later
If plant growth becomes a senous problem.
#6 Temporary water level drawdown to control weeds. This optIon may not be
needed if the lake level is mamtained at 853' under the new option. Could be
considered later If weed growth becomes a senous problem.
III. Public Meeting
The Task Force recommended that a pubhc meeting be scheduled on Thursday, February
25 The meetmg would be held m the Council Chambers at Stillwater City Hall. The
consultants Will present the new option and dISCUSS ItS affect on the lake and surrounding
properties, and will present the recommendatIons of the Task Force.
IV. Next Task Force Meeting
The next task force meetIng is scheduled on Tuesday, March 2. The Task Force will
reVIew the results of the public meeting and complete ItS recommendations to the City
Council.
The meeting adjourned at 4 p.m.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,/
Public Meeting
McKusick Lake Area Homeowners
Thursday, February 25, 1999
AGENDA
I. Welcome and Introductions of Task Force
Agnes Ring, Bonestroo & Associates
ll. Meeting Purpose and Background
Stillwater AUAR Recommendations
Klayton Eckles, Stillwater Public Works Director
AUAR Potential Impacts on McKusick Lake
Rich Brasch, Bonestroo & Associates
Ill. Proposed Lake Management Option---
Task Force Recommend,tions
Rich Brasch, Mark Hanson, Sherri Buss
Bonestroo & Associates
IV. Questions and Comments
Audience
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Summary of Responses to Questions By Attendees
McKusick Lake Public Meeting
February 25, 1999
1. Why not just put in a bigger pipe, so you could just leave the wetland alone?
A bigger pipe is part of the new proposed management strategy for McKusIck Lake.
Under the proposed recommendation, the existing outlet capacity would lIkely be
expanded to reduce the bounce in McKusick Lake for storm events. Some modification
of the system that takes McKusIck Lake discharge through downtown StIllwater will be
needed to accommodate the additional flows associated with both the diversion and the
outlet enlargement. However, the conveyance system improvements necessary to carry
all flow from large runoff events would likely be prohIbitively expensive. Further, they
appear unnecessary since discharge of additional stormwater from larger events over the
proposed spillway at the north end of the lake to Brown's Creek will be sufficiently
infrequent so that the trout population is impacted no more than under the AUAR
preferred option.
2. What was the phosphorus level before the City began pumping from Lily Lake?
You use the word "historically" to talk about the last five years (the years for
which you have records). That is Dot very historic.
Good data for water quality is only available since 1994 for McKusick Lake and since
1995 for Lily Lake. The lift station that periodically discharges Lily Lake water to
McKusick Lake was installed in the early 1980's. Thus, water quality information prior
to the installation of the lift station is not avallable. Data that is available indicates that
water quality in Lily Lake is generally better than that in McKusick Lake. Thus,
incoming water from Lily Lake should have no adverse impact on water quality in
McKusick Lake.
3. Do the treatment options you're proposing for McKusick take into consideration
the proposed treatment at Lily Lake?
The treatment options for Lily Lake would all be aimed at improving water quality in
Lily Lake, which should result in better quality discharges to McKusick Lake. However,
the impact of these discharges will be negligible because of the volume of water coming
into McKusick Lake from other sources after the dIversion is constructed. By far the
biggest impact on water quality in McKusick Lake will be the quality of the large amount
of water coming from the diversion above the lake.
4. We're getting all this water from the aDnexation area. I know where it surfaces
downtown on Second Street. What if it rains 8 inches?-It won't fit.
The proposed plan includes a recommendation to improve the conveyance system
downstream of McKusick Lake These improvements would be made after a more
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
detailed evaluation of the downstream system It IS Important to remember thafon:ly--
runoff from a 35 lDch (5-year) stonn need be accommodated by the downstream system.
The additional runoff from larger events will be discharged to the north wetland and into
Brown's Creek.
5. Is the proposed stream restoration actually going to take place?
Yes. MnDNR fishenes staff are working on final designs for a restored stream channel
on Brown's Creek.
6. Why did you go from 853.4 to 853 (normal water level since 1993 vs. the
proposed new normal water level). You're giving up a half a foot. Why can't we
go to 853-112?
A normal water level of 853 for McKusick Lake was considered by the task force as the
best compromise between maintaining a higher normal water level in the lake and
minimizing the potential for flood impacts around the lake under post-diversion
conditions. For reference purposes, the water level in the lake last October was about
852.7.
7. Why did the City issue a buDding permit that resulted in a basement being at an
elevation of 861.3 (basement floor elevation of 854.8}-the lowest on the lake?
Why should everyone else have to accommodate this <as a constraint to
maintaining a higher NWL in the lake)?
Whatever the reason for the decision, it is something we have to live with and view as a
legitimate constraint on how high the lake water level can be raised. Given the normal
water levels of the lake in the past (851.5-852.3), the decision to allow construction of
this home doesn't seem particularly unreasonable.
8. The deep spot in the lake used to be deeper-21 feet. It supported many fish.
There never used to be winterkill. Why is there winter kill now?
Histoncal observations by fisheries experts and residents indicate that the connection
between the lake and the north wetland apparently allowed fish to enter the spring areas
in the north wetland and even Brown's Creek itself to overwinter. A decrease in the
maximum depth of the lake from 21 feet to 15-16 feet currently is unlikely by itself to
have much impact on the winterkill potential.
9. By not having Brown's Creek run through wetlands first, will the water quality
turn yucky? Are there springs?
There appears to be significant spring discharge to the wetland both above and below the
point at which the diversion water would be introduced to McKusick Lake. Hopefully,
spnng discharges WIll help to sustain the wetland in near its present condition. Keeping
McKusick Lake at a higher level than the wetland means that the option to direct the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
diversIon flow to the wetland for addItIonal treatment is no longer avallable Underlhese-
conditions, It becomes even more important to create water quality treatment ponds in the
upper watershed to reduce pollutant levels in the incoming water to McKusICk Lake
10. With increased flow, what is the effect on vegetation, water temperature and
depth on the lake?
VelZetation: If the nutrient concentration of the water increases, aquatic vegetatIon could
increase. However, water quality modeling indicates that nutrient concentrations after
the diversion should be at the upper end of the historical range experienced before the
diversion. Thus, water quality as evidenced by water clarity should be about the same as
it has been historically.
Water temperature: We don't expect the water temperature to change from the fairly
warm conditions in existence today.
Lake depth: Like all lakes, McKusick Lake will gradually fill in over time due to reSIdue
from decaying plant matter, etc. The trick is to slow this process to the extent possible by
making sure eroded sediment from construction doesn't reach the lake and by minimi7.ing
the amount of phosphorus that reaches the lake to feed excessive aquatic plant growth.
11. If there is a 1 % chance annually for the storm even you describe (100-year
storm) how long would the water level be at 855 feet? I am concerned about
capillary action. My basement is at 857. Is it safe? What's the likelihood of
getting flooded?
It could remain at that level for about two weeks. Capillary action would likely take
longer than that to reach it's full extent.
12. What controls the flow of water into the pipe that goes to the St. Croix?
The main controls on the amount of water are the elevation of the lake relative to the
outlet pipe and crest of the proposed spillway to the north wetland, the size of the outlet
pipe, and the slope of the outlet pipe. At present there is a 21-inch outlet pipe from
McKusick Lake that discharges to combination of open channel and pipes that carry the
flow through downtown. While a more detailed look needs to be taken at the work
required to improve thIs system, the preliminary estimate for the work is $350,000 to
$450,000.
13. Explain the bounce in McKusick Lake and the volume and rate of flow out of the
lake.
A storm event will generate runoff that will cause a temporary rise in the level of the lake
before all the water from the event is discharged through the outlet(s). The bigger the
storm event, the higher the maximum elevation to which this water level will rise. The
obJective of the task force was to keep the maximum water level in McKusick Lake from
nsing no more than 2 feet for a 5-year storm (3 5 inches in 24 hours) and no more than 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
feet from a 100-year storm (6 mches 1n 24 hours). Enlargement of the outlet pIpe and ---------
adjustment of the elevation of the spillway to the north wetland will be necessary to meet
these goals, but computer modelmg indicates that they can be met.
14. When would the bypass occur? Should there be an emergency structure to :flood
the wetland before the lake would :flood in a catastrophic event?
With the proposed spIllway, lake water would be discharged mto the north wetland to
mmunize the rise in the flood stage of the lake. As per the requirements outline in the
AUAR, bypass of flood discharges to the north wetland from the lake would occur only
for storms greater than a 5-year event (3.5 inches in 24 hrs ).
15. What is the elevation of the wetland, lake and channel?
The elevation of the wetland ranges from about 856 at it's northwest corner to 851 at it's
northeast comer. The proposed NWL of the lake is 853. The channel elevation just
above the lake is 854.
16. Does the dike (at the north end of the wetland under the preferred AUAR
option) have to get built?
Under the new option being proposed by the McKusick Lake task force, the dike at the
north end of the wetland would not be constructed. Instead, the existing dike between the
north wetland and the lake would be raised slightly.
17. Doesn't the stormwater utility fee that we pay cover all the costs for the
improvements?
No. That fee covers maintenance items, such as street sweeping in the Lily Lake
dramage. In the future, the funds will likely support similar activities in the McKusick
Lake watershed. Charges to developers will pay for most of the capital costs of the
proposed improvements.
18. What is the next step?
A final report on recommendations from the task force will be presented to the City
CouncillD April 1999. If the Council concurs with the recommendations, a permit
application to raise the normal operating level of the lake to 853 would be submitted to
the MnDNR. The process of securing donations of easements from shoreline owners will
also begin.
19. What if one penon says no to the easement (required to raise the permitted
NWL to 853)?
It is likely that MnDNR will require easements from 100 percent of the lakefront property
owners before it actually approves issuance of a permit for the htgher water level The
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City will have to decide Its course of action, but It IS highly unlIkely that the CIty would
agree to purchase any easements. The City will likely look to the McKusick Lake
Association to exercise leadership on this issue, since the shorelme owners have
expressed a strong desire to raise the permitted elevation of the lake.
20. What are the funding issues? Where does the money come from to pay for the
improvements? What is the timeline?
New developments In the watershed contribute to a fund to finance construction of these
Improvements. An estimated $3.5 million is expected to be raised from development
funds. City staff is exploring funding options including state funds and cost sharing with
Brown's Creek Watershed and the City of Oak Park Heights.
The City expects to begin design this summer The best case is that construction would
begm in two years and the worst case, in five years.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McKusick Lake Study Task Force
Tuesday, March 2,1999
2 to 4 p.m.
Stillwater City Hall
Lower Level Meeting Room (near Police Offices)
Agenda
1. Review Comments from Public Meeting
(Summary will be distributed at Task Force Meeting)
II. Final Review of Lake Management Recommendations for
Presentation to City Council
III. Next Steps
IV. Adjourn
If you have questions about the meeting or agenda, please call Sherri Buss at
604-4758. See you on the 12th!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:\tlcKusick Lake Task Force
l\'Iarch 3, 1999
Stillwater City Hall
Meeting Summa!)-
PRESENT: Chuck Fredenckson, John Baird, McKuSICk Lake AssociatIOn: Jerry
Fontame, Stlllwater Planning CommIssion, Klayton Eckles, City of StIllwater, Molly
Shodeen, MIke Hah orsen, ~hnnesota DNR; Nancy Brown, Stillwater Parks
ConuDlsslOn, Rich Brasch, Bonestroo & ASsocIates
B) : SherrI Buss. Bonestroo & AssocIates
I. Review Comments from Public Meeting
Task Force members reviewed a summary of the comments and questions from the
Public Meeting held on February 25. Twenty-two people attended the public meeting.
Members concluded that those who attended the meetmg were in favor of the new lake
management option (with a normal lake level of853') and the water quality impro~ement
strategIes recommended by the Task Force
DNR staff noted that remammg concerns include the effect of the new option on Brovm's
Creek and on the ra\ ine do\\nstream from McKusIck Lake Bonestroo staff indIcated
that modeling has been completed that shows that the new option will have the same or
an Improved result for Bro\\n's Creek in companson with the option proposed under the
StIllwater ADAR City staff are recommendmg that some additional work be completed
to detail the effect of additIOnal flows m the ravine, and develop recommendatIons to
protect the ra~ me and downstream conveyance system
II. Final Review of Lake )Ianagement Recommendations for Presentation to the
City Council
Members revle\\ed the recommendations, and made no changes. The recommendations
\\111 be presented to the Stillwater CIty Councll at theIr first meeting in April, along with
the modelmg results and recommendations for further study of the ravine and
do'vnstream system
III Next Steps
If the City Councll adopts the recommendatIons of the Task Force, the Council will then
ask that lake shore each land o\\ner around McKusICk Lake agree to donate an easement
up to the new high \\ ater level
Task Force members suggested that the City should provide some stakes along the
shoreline to show residents the new high water level, and suggested easements. The CIty
should also mform reSIdents about what is allowed within the easement.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If easements are donated b) alllakeshore O\\lners, the CIty will request that the DNR raise
the normal water level ofMcKusIck Lake to 853 feet
Task Force members also suggested that theIr recommendations regardmg restnctIons on
motorized boat traffic and de\<elopment of a canoe access on McKusick Lake be referred
to appropnate city commissions, such as the Planning CommIssion or Parks CommissIon
ThIc:; suggestIon could be included in the recommendation to the CIty CouncIl
Members requested that they be notified of the CIty CounCIl meetmg that will mclude the
reVIew of the Task Force report
IV. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 3:45.
City staff and consultants thanked the members of the Task Force for their time and
good ideas that made this project a success.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
WISCONSIN LAKE MObELSPREADSHEET
VERSION 201 - AUGUST 1996
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Although thiS model has been tested by WDNR, no warranty IS
expressed or Implied See users manual prior model use
**44.......................... ......******* ************* ..............."',.'A"". ************* .*****...,......"** *********.*** *** **
*
*
*
*
*
LAKE 10 McKuslck Lake, Stlllwater(AUAR preferred wI ponds)
To auto load wtrshd data, enter county 10, hold CTRL and type L
WATERSHED COUNTY IDENT NUMBER = 56 CO NAME St CroIX
*
*
*
....,.********* AAA"............... *********..... ************* ************* ************* ********'***** ... **
HYDROLOGIC AND MORPHOMETRIC MODULE *
================================================================= *
ENGLISH METRIC *
TRIB DRAINAGE AREA = 42110 Ac 1 70E+07 m^2 *
TOTAL UNIT RUNOFF = 87 In 0222 m *
ANNUAL RUNOFF VOLUME = 3067 0 Ac-Ft 3 78E+06 m^3 *
LAKE SURFACE AREA <As> = 460 Ac 1 86E+05 m^2 *
LAKE VOLUME <V> = 160 0 Ac-ft 1 97E+05 m^3 *
LAKE MEAN DEPTH <z> = 348 Ft 106 m *
PRECIP - EVAP = 62 In 016 m *
HYDRAULIC LOADING = 3090 8 Ac-FtNr 381E+06 m^3Nr *
AREAL WATER lOAD <qs> = 6 72E+01 FtlYr 2 05E+01 mNr *
LAKE FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1932 Nr Tw = 005 Yr *
************* ************* ..................AAAA"'''* ....********** ****A.............LAAa\ ***....******* ..............AAAAAAAA *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
'.
Page 1
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
************* ************* *'*****'******* ************* ..........*.ii. .....******..*** ****'********* *** ***
PHOSPHORUS LOADING MODULE
=================================================================
--LOADING (KglHa-Yr)-
LAND USE AREA MOST LOADING
(AC) LOW LIKELY HIGH PERCENT
ROW CROP AG 00 050 150 300 00
MIXED AG 00 080 100 140 00
PASTURE/GRASS 00 010 030 050 00
HD URBAN 00 100 130 200 00
MD URBAN 00 040 050 080 00
RURAL RES 00 005 010 025 00
WETLANDS 00 010 010 010 00
FOREST 00 005 009 018 00
OTHER LAND USE 1 4211 0 014 024 034 988
OTHER LAND USE 2 00 000 000 000 00
LAKE SURFACE 460 010 027 100 12
*
*
*
POINT SOURCE WATER LOADING (m^3Nr) =
POINT SOURCE PHOS (KgNr) 0 00
SEPTANKOUTPUT~wc~yry 030
# capita-years = 0 00
% P RETAINED BY SOIL = 98
SEP TANK LOADING (KgNr) 000
o OOE+QO
000 000
o 50 0.80
*
00
*
*
*
90 80
000 000
*
00
*
---------------------
*
TOTAL LOADINGS (Lb) =
TOTAL LOADINGS (Kg) =
530E+02 913E+02 132E+03
240E+02 4 14E+02 5 98E+02
1000
1000
*
*
*
AREAL LOADING(Lb/Ac-Yr) = 115E+01 1 98E+01 287E+01
AREAL LOADING(mg/m^2-yr)= 1 29E+03 2 22E+03 3 21 E+03
% TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION = 0
*
*
*
-----------------------
*
To view a graph of phosphorus Inputs expressed as percentages
of the total phosphorus load, select the LOAD GRAPH tab When you
are finslshed viewing the graph, select the WILMS200 tab
************* IoA""""'........."4...A ************* ************* ............. ************* .........A.......A......"A... *** **.
*
*
*
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
PHOSPHORUS PREDICTION MODULE
._********.*. ************* ************* ..*********** ************* ************* **********'*** *** .*.
*
=================================================================
THE OBSERVED SPRING TOTAL PHOSPHORUS =
THE OBSERVED GROWING SEASON PHOSPHORUS :
o mglm^3
110 mg/m^3
Enter the spring and/or the growing season P concentration
The lake models predict either an SPO or a GSM P concentration
A predicted phosphorus concentration Will appear only for those
models where the observed value has been entered An "NA" IS
returned If a model IS not calculated
Spnng Overturn P conc = SPO, Growmg Season Mean P cone = GSM
LAKE PHOSPHORUS MODELS
PREDICTED
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
(mg/m^3)
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR MODEL (GSM)
45 77 111
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN,1981,ARTIFICAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
4 RECKHOW, 1979, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (GSM)
36 61 89
5 RECKHOW, 1977, ANOXIC LAKE MODEL (GSM)
55 95 138
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 mlyr (GSM)
44 76 110
7 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs > 50 m1yr (GSM)
#N~ #N~ #N~
8 WALKER 1977, GENERAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
#WA #N~ #N~
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO and GSM)
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO) #N/A
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs < 10 mlyr #N/A
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs >= 10 mlyr 047
*a.U,........\I,......... "A A....AA A AA.........,........................U...........U.....U,AA.U.. U"A...AAA"..........U..............U....AA**
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
77
#N/A
#N/A
61
95
76
#N/A
#N/A
73
*
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
***
Page 3
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*********.&&&&&44"..********..*******************..*.......***********
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS MODULE
=================================================================
PREDICTED
MINUS 70 PERCENT
OBSERVE[PERCENT CONFIDENCE
LAKE RESPONSE MODEL (mglm^3) DIFF INTERVAL
......----......---------...--------....----......-....-----
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR 77 #DIVlO' 48 112
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A <=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A <=
4 RECKHOW, 1979 GENERAL -49 -45 37 92
5 RECKHOW, 1977 ANOXIC -15 -14 61 136
6 RECKHOW, 1977 qS<50rn/yr -34 -31 46 113
7 RECKHOW, 1977 qs>50rn/yr #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 18 33
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER #N/A #NIA
<= Range wlth.n which 95% of the observations should fall
See users manual diSCUSSion on the use of these models
AA,U....AA...AAA"A ************* ...."A......,U.A..."'..' ************* ,,&...a.AA4A...AAAA .U,AIU,A.U.,I.,I,AAJ. ....AAA.U..U..U,AA *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
-.
.
.
..
..
.
.
..
.
.
..
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
..*********** ._*-********* ********"oJr.. ************* ************* ***********.... ************* *** ...
PARAMETER RANGE MODULE
Model Input values MUST be within the ranges listed below
WILMS dIsplays FIT If Inputs sattsfy conditions. NO FIT If not
*
*
*
*
PARAMETERS
=================================================================
*
************* ************* ************* ************* ...........*** ************* *********"'*** *** ***
AREAL WATER LOADING <qs=zlTw> = 2 05E+01 mJyr
INFLOW PHOSPHORUS CONC <LTw/z> = 0109 mgn
MEAN DEPTH <z> = 106m
FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1932 Iyr
HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME <Tw> = 005 yr
AREAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING <L> = 2224 04 mg/m^2-yr
P = PREDICTED IN LAKE PHOS CONCENTRATION mglm^3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Model data base size
=================================================================
*
1 WALKER. 1985 RESERVOIR MODEL
1 5 < z < 58 m 013 < Tw < 191 yr
0014 < L Twlz < 1 047 mgll
<NO FIT>
P=
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P < 2600 mg/m^3 30< L < 7600 mg/m^2-yr #N/A
02< z <307 m 0001< P <183/yr P=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 ARTIFICIAL LAKE MODEL
6< P <1500 mg/m^3 40< L <820.000 mg/m^2Iyr #N/A
06< z <59 m 0019< P <1800Nr P=
4 RECKHOW.1979 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P <135 mg/m^3 70< L <31,400 mg/m^2-yr
075< qs <187 mlyr
<FIT>
P=
5 RECKHOW,1977 ANOXIC LAKE MODEL
17< P < 610 mg/m^3 0 024< LTw/z< o 621mg/\
<FIT>
P=
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 mlyr
P < 60 mg/m^3 L Twlz < 298 mgll
<NO FIT>
P=
7 RECKHOW, 1977 LAKES WITH qs > 50 mJyr
P < 135 mglm^3 L Twlz < 0 178 mgll
Tw < 0 25 yr z < 13 m
#N/A
P=
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
P < 900 mg/m^3 L Tw/z < 1 0 mgn
#N/A
P=
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
NOT AVAILABLE
<FIT>
P=
(41)
77
(290)
#N/A
(433)
#N/A
(47)
61
(21)
95
(33)
76
(28)
#N/A
(105)
#N/A
73
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10 DILLON. RIGLER, KIRCHNER. 1975 LAKE MODEL (15)
P < 15 mglm^3 107 < L < 2210 mglm^2-yr #N/A
15< qs < 223 mlyr 021< P < 63/yr P= #N/A
............. ***.......,l.......&........ .",..........44............" **..********* ***'*****..... ..........*** ......******** ... '***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
*
*
Page 5
PONDSIZE Model lor McKuslCk Lake Walershed Informallon from HydroCad model prepared Olllllow from AnalysIS MeKuslCk Lake DiversIOn Impact (1996 WILMS Input) Receives flow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R by Ene Pelers (BRA) for SllIIwater AUAR OPH easlof Hwy 5 Seenano Loadngs to MeKuslCk L ,wi dlVerslOO, OPH easloll-
Brasdl, November 1998 Oak Park Heights Sub DlStncI Market Place SubdlStnel AUAR Preferred OptIOn (NWL=852) wi wetland Ireatment and addl pone flBld cheekad
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 4,8 field checked 1 4,8 48 4,8
case libel OPH-13 OPH-14 OPH.12 OPH-150PH-l1 MP-12 MP.121 Reach.13 MP.99 MP-l MP.2 MP-98 MP-5 MP-7
watershed _a acres 59 64 29 38 78 96 99 0001 234 798 212 187 154 758
bem _a acres 345 097 11 07 38 03 08 0001 12 04 0001 044 015 33
basil volume aere.fl 67 29 2 28 131 064 16 0001 48 04 0001 088 03 132
% agnculural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% lI1dustnal 0 0 0 100 66 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100
% mulb family res 0 0 0 0 11 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
% slIgle family res 100 100 100 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% open_a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load Ibs/yr 000 000 000 647 5086 000 000 574 000 1060 000 000 1180 20169
upstream oulllow ac-II/yr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 2053 350 10
OUTPUT VARIABLES
ouIIlow p load f;)s/yr 1258 1308 647 2520 6680 289 286 573 1060 8412 2210 1180 2295 186 42
oulllow volume ac-fl/yr 2204 2390 1083 5256 166 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744 433 33
oulllow p cone ppb 21008 201 38 21988 17640 14797 21653 207 84 21150 15174 27312 349 29 21141 22547 158 28
P removalellicteney % 5332 5525 51 14 4542 4499 5189 5382 030 5665 1047 021 3960 1772 3363
vlawmo pond volume acra.fl 204 221 100 388 828 045 047 000 238 811 216 190 157 771
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpllal10n Ilches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 45000 450 00 450 00 35000 384 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 35000 35000 35000 350 00 350 00 350 00
Nnoff ortho p/to\al p 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
und Nnoff Il/yr 448 448 448 1318 1040 813 813 813 1318 1318 1318 1318 1318 1318
unll export lbsIac-y 046 046 046 104 090 062 062 062 104 104 104 104 104 104
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-ll/yr 2204 2390 1083 4172 6761 490 506 000 2589 8762 2328 2053 1691 8323
upstream pond ac-fl/yr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 2053 350 10
total rnIIow ac-tlJyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 166 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744 433 33
oulllow ac-II/yr 2204 2390 1083 5256 166 10 490 506 998 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744 433 33
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnoff tb&iyr 2695 2924 1325 3969 7057 600 618 000 2444 8336 2215 1953 1609 7918
upstream pond tbsIyr 000 000 000 647 5086 000 000 574 000 1060 000 000 1180 201 69
lotalllflow fbs/yr 2695 2924 1325 4617 121 43 600 618 574 2444 9395 2215 1953 2788 280 87
nat sedmantatlOn lbsIyr 1437 1615 678 2097 5463 311 333 002 1385 984 005 774 494 9445
outflow lbsIyr 1258 1308 647 2520 6680 289 286 573 1060 8412 2210 1180 2295 18642
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 194 299 182 400 345 213 200 100 400 100 100 200 200 400
relatIVe volume IIlches 821 328 499 1 81 523 352 854 5286 504 012 000 116 048 428
resilience Ime yea,s 030 012 018 005 008 013 032 000 019 000 000 004 001 003
resilience Ime days 11097 4428 6740 1945 2879 4764 11550 004 6819 129 002 1564 292 11 12
ov8lftow rale ftIyr 639 2464 985 7508 4371 1634 632 9960 14 2141 283 28 23277 60 4667 24961 131 31
III10w phos cone ppb 450 02 450 02 450 02 323 20 268 97 450 02 45002 212 13 350 02 305 06 35002 350 02 27401 238 47
oulllow pIlos cone ppb 21008 201 38 21988 176 40 14797 21653 207 84 211 50 151 74 273 12 349 29 21141 22547 15828
P reaction rale 245 276 214 152 149 224 252 000 301 013 000 109 026 076
1-1)) 047 045 049 055 055 048 046 100 043 090 100 060 082 066
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnolf total P calc ppb 450 00 45000 450 00 350 00 38400 45000 45000 450 00 350 00 350 00 35000 350 00 350 00 350 00
NnoIf coelfic:lanl 017 017 017 049 039 023 023 023 049 049 049 049 049 049
dlSSOlvedltotal P 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IIIIIltDsl~I'or~ Lake~ - - - - ~ake"'bdISIn~ - - - - - - - -
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R 1wy5 depth as rec by EP depths for LE-7 & 4 rec by EP
Brasch, November 1998 field chect.ed field c.hecked field checked check check check Legends and Llbeny Dev (lA
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 2 4,8 4,8 Pond 10 2.9 2 2 2 2,9 2,9 2 2 1
case IBbel MP-l1 MP-8 MP-9 MP-14 (Rch-10) LE-1 LE-3 LE-5 LE-6 LE-7 LE-4 LE-8 LLD-32 LLD.33
watershed area acres 772 349 1474 129 258 386 45 99 329 91 1059 325 9 29
baSil area acres 027 035 3 06 23 34 03 048 0001 35 175 0001 065 065
basil volume acre-ft 0001 0001 75 06 69 68 0001 0001 0001 35 35 0001 0001 26
'" agnculurelland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% lIIdullnal 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 89 0 34 0 0
'" mulb fam~ res 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
'" sllgla family res 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 100
% open area 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 11 26 64 0 0
upstream p load IbSIyr 000 3521 5696 000 25731 000 000 000 000 361 6474 58 81 000 561
upstream oulftow ac-ftIyr 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 107 94 142 79 000 460
OuTPUT VARIABLES
ouUJow p bad lbslyr 3521 5696 6184 905 234 38 264 049 109 361 6052 5881 6977 561 755
ouUJow volume ac-ftIyr 2883 4666 10171 1416 577 53 741 091 200 686 9762 142 79 15913 460 1543
ouIftow P COlIC ppb 44t 33 449 14 223 70 23501 14932 13111 199 75 199 85 19947 228 09 151 53 161 32 44917 180 10
P removal efflClllllCY % 015 010 5025 3286 1755 3445 013 008 027 2968 4189 001 019 5996
vIBwmo pond volume acre-ft 267 165 510 131 262 069 008 019 062 842 323 151 043 100
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
sealon preclpllallOl1 llChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
IUIIlllf tate. P ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 200 00 200 00 20000 200 00 333 50 38500 24700 4!S000 450 00
Nnotr OIttIo pItotal p 040 040 040 040 040 061 061 061 061 042 045 053 040 040
unlllUlloff IIIIyr 448 613 448 1318 1318 243 243 243 243 1199 395 604 613 446
unll export lbslac-y 046 062 046 104 104 011 011 011 011 091 034 034 062 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-ftlyr 2883 1783 5505 1416 2833 741 091 200 666 9095 3485 1634 460 1083
upltream pond ac-fllyr 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 107 94 14279 000 460
totalllflow ac-ftlyr 2883 4666 10111 1416 577 53 741 091 200 666 9762 142 79 159 13 460 1543
ouUJow ac-fllyr 2883 4666 101 71 1416 577 53 741 091 200 666 9762 142 79 15913 460 1543
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnoff lbslyr 3527 2180 6734 1348 2695 403 050 109 362 8245 3647 1097 562 1325
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 3521 5696 000 25731 000 000 000 000 361 6474 58 81 000 561
totalllflow Ibslyr 3527 5702 12430 1348 284 26 403 050 109 362 8606 101 21 6978 562 1886
nat sadmentatlOn Ibllyr 005 008 6246 443 4987 139 000 000 001 2555 4240 001 001 1131
oulftow Ibslyr 3521 5696 6184 905 234 38 264 049 109 361 8052 58 81 6977 561 755
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feat 000 000 250 100 300 200 000 000 100 100 200 100 000 400
relalNe volume lIIc:has 000 000 368 114 658 2477 003 001 000 104 2712 000 001 648
residence Ime years 000 000 007 004 001 092 000 000 000 004 025 000 000 017
reSidence tme dayl 001 001 2891 1546 436 334 88 040 018 005 1309 8947 000 008 6151
ovefflow rate ftIyr 106 79 13331 3390 2361 251 10 218 304 418 6662 25 2789 816 15913403 707 2374
Ilflow pIIOI cone ppb 450 02 449 59 44962 350 02 181 09 200 01 20001 200 01 200 01 324 37 260 77 161 34 450 02 44977
oulftow phOl cone ppb 449 33 449 14 223 70 235 01 149 32 131 11 19975 19985 19947 228 09 151 53 161 32 44917 180 10
P reactlOl1 rate 000 000 203 073 026 080 000 000 000 060 124 000 000 374
l-rp 100 100 050 087 082 066 100 100 100 070 058 100 100 040
LAND USE PARAME:TERS
Nnofftotal P calc ppb 450 00 45000 450 00 350 00 35000 20000 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 24700 450 00 450 00
runoff coatficJenl 017 023 017 049 049 009 009 009 009 044 015 022 023 017
dlllolvadltotal P 040 040 040 040 040 061 061 061 061 042 045 053 040 040
PONDSIZE Model for MeKuaJCk Lake
W Walker July 1981, adapted by R
Braach, November 1998 ..al of Long Lake)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 1 1 Landlocked 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
case label LLD-34 LLD-35 LLD-36 LLD-311 LLD-37 LLD-36 LLD-39 LLD-40 LLD-41 LLD-42 LLD-43 LLD-60 LLD-44 LLD-45
walerlhed area acres 314 44 9 16 76 55 15 26 126 141 239 73 458 151
baall area acres 1 015 08 0001 01 026 04 086 01 09 0001 0001 19 033
baSIl voluma acre-ft 62 075 3 0001 0001 0001 02 14 32 04 0001 0001 10 087
% agnculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% lIdustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mullJ family ras 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% SIIgle family res 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100
% open area 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load Ibllyr 155 000 000 000 054 400 162 000 020 209 614 000 000 248 50
ups1ream outflow ac-fl/yr 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050 000 000 114303
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibllyr 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 614 1762 326 248 50 25351
outflow voluma ao-fl/yr 2940 164 182 284 466 612 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 114889
outflow p cone ppb 12440 253 56 10912 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 13679 14718 236 27 333 69 440 23 7999 8118
P removal etIlcl8ney " 5968 4368 4514 210 049 027 1630 3161 6483 2100 024 218 4086 084
vlawmo pond volume acre-It 129 015 017 026 026 019 003 005 044 049 083 025 722 054
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pr8Clpdallon IIchea 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
Nnolf totBl P ppb 45000 450 00 200 00 45000 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 45000 450 00 450 00 399 50 450 00
Nnoff orItlo pIlotel P 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 035 040
un. NnolJ In/yr 448 448 243 448 448 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 673 448
un. export Ibslao-y 046 046 011 046 048 046 011 011 046 046 046 046 061 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnolf ac-fllyr 1391 164 182 284 284 205 030 053 471 527 893 273 7797 586
upstream pond ac-ftIyr 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050 000 1065 06 114303
totaIlIIlow ac-fl/yr 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 114889
oulllow ao-fl/yr 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 114889
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnolf Ibstyr 1709 201 099 347 347 251 017 029 576 644 1092 334 8467 717
upstraam pond Ibllyr 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674 000 335 52 248 50
tolalllllow Ib$/yr 2464 201 099 347 402 651 779 029 595 853 1766 334 42019 255 67
net sedmantallon Ibllyr 1470 088 045 007 002 002 127 009 386 179 004 007 171 69 215
oulflow Ibllyr 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 674 1762 326 248 50 25351
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 620 100 375 100 001 000 050 163 457 044 100 100 392 264
relabve volume lIIches 1198 1232 4444 001 001 001 1778 7179 1836 205 000 001 5264 401
residence Ime years 021 046 165 000 000 000 002 266 061 004 000 000 013 000
residence Ime days 7698 166 58 600 82 013 008 005 843 970 56 223 22 1391 002 013 4854 028
over1low rale ftIyr 2940 219 228 2836 60 4661 2583 2166 061 748 1167 1942560 2726 55 2946 3481 49
IIf10w pIIos cone ppb 308 36 450 02 200 01 450 02 31696 35660 33080 200 01 41851 299 09 33450 450 02 13525 8187
0lI111ow phos cone ppb 12440 253 56 109 72 44059 31542 355 62 27689 136 79 147 18 236 27 33369 44023 7999 8118
P reactIOn rata 367 138 150 002 000 000 023 068 524 034 000 002 117 001
1-rp 040 056 055 098 100 100 084 068 035 079 100 098 059 099
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoIf total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 45000 450 00 399 50 450 00
Nnolf coefIlClent 017 017 009 017 017 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 025 017
d18solveclllolal P 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.....DSI~lfor~ L.k'- - - - ~Ulflowll!tD - - - - - - - - - -
W W.lker July 1987. adapted by R west of LL (Link 3 on LL HCD)
Bralell November 1998 Long Lake-S 1 03. S 1 05, S 106 .nd IlIlked w.terlhedl depth .1 ree by EP
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 Long L Long L Long L Dummy 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 1
cale label LLD-31 Drect30 Drect47 DIl'ect46 LongL LL-l LL-2 LL-3 LL.4 LL-5 LL-6 LL-7 LL-8 Reach 9
w.tershed ....a .erel 14 207 81 138 0001 152 77 234 7 96 182 273 45 39
bRllI'I ..... .eres 015 0001 0001 0001 0001 2 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 24 0001 0001
bRIll volume .ere-fl 056 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 48 0001 0001
'l(, egncullurel land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'l(, IIdulln8l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'l(, multi fllllllly reI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'l(, IlIgle family res 100 0 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
'l(, open .ree 0 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Upstrelllll P load IbBlyr 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412 000 3667 000 199
upstream oulllow IIc-ft/yr 000 000 000 000 120219 000 000 855 000 1991 000 3029 000 168
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibslyr 000 227 383 151 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844 824 2430 199 370
oulflow volume ac-ftIyr 523 419 303 279 1202 19 568 288 1729 261 2349 680 4049 168 314
outflow p cone ppb 195 50 199 15 441 15 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 44531 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53
P remov.1 efflClllney " 5656 043 197 064 000 007 207 036 226 026 090 5055 341 187
vlllwmo pond volume .cre-fl 048 039 028 026 000 053 027 081 024 033 063 094 016 013
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length Yf'I 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
leason precipitatIOn lIe1leS 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
Nnotr tolal p ppb 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 20000 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
Nnoff ortho pIl0181 p 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
und Nnoff Il/yr 448 243 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448
URlt export lbBlaC>y 046 011 046 011 011 046 046 046 046 046 046 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-ftIyr 523 419 303 279 000 568 288 874 261 359 680 1020 168 146
upltre.m pond .o-ftIyr 000 000 000 000 1202 19 000 000 855 000 1991 000 3029 000 168
tol8ll1l1ow ao-ftIyr 523 419 303 279 1202 19 568 288 1729 261 2349 680 4049 168 314
outflow ao-ftIyr 523 419 303 279 1202 19 588 288 1729 261 2349 680 4049 168 314
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnoff IbBlyr 640 228 370 152 000 694 352 1069 320 439 831 1247 206 178
Upstrelllll pond IbBlyr 000 000 000 000 277 36 000 000 1038 000 2412 000 3667 000 199
tol8lllllow IbBlyr 640 228 370 152 277 38 694 352 2107 320 2851 831 4915 206 377
net sedmentellon lbsJyr 640 001 007 001 000 000 007 008 007 008 008 2484 007 007
ouIIIow Ibslyr 227 383 151 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844 824 2430 199 370
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond me.n depth feet 373 100 100 100 100 000 100 100 100 100 100 200 100 100
relatIVe volume lIe1lel 289 001 001 001 13333 000 001 000 001 001 000 1271 002 002
residence Ime yaRra 011 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 012 000 000
residence line days 3909 009 012 013 000 0,06 013 002 014 002 005 4327 022 012
overflow rate flIYr 3486 4191 75 3025 35 2794 50 1202191 81 284 2875 95 17293 05 2614 50 2349315 6797 70 1687 1680 75 313740
III10w phos cone ppb 45002 200 01 45002 200 01 8489 45002 450 02 448 37 450 02 44649 450 02 44661 450 02 44181
outflow phos cone ppb 195 50 19915 44115 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 448 76 439 83 44531 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53
p reactJon rete 300 000 002 001 000 000 002 000 002 000 001 207 004 002
l-rp 043 100 098 099 100 100 098 100 098 100 099 049 097 098
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnoff total P calc ppb 45000 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
Nnoff coetIicIent 017 009 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 017 017 017 017 017
d.lOlvedllotal P 040 081 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
PONOSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake ReceIVes outflow ReceIVes outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R from MP from OPH, LE
Brasch, November 1998 (Lnk 1 on LL HCOI (Lnk 2 on LL HCOI
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 1 1 2 1 no entry (HCt 1 2 2
case label LL-15 LL-14 LL-13 LL-12 LL-11 LL-30 Ll-20 LL-21 LL-22 LL-23 0..-10 0..-16 Long Lake WMA Pond
watershed area acres 284 355 478 86 378 1095 374 298 266 285 252 595 0001 398
basn 8188 acres 5 142 0001 089 158 1 0001 0001 242 046 0001 0001 933 169
basn volume acre-fl 0001 246 0001 0001 16 05 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 380 338
'" agncultw'8lland 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" ndustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 30 0 0 0 0
'" multi family res 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" sngle family res 25 100 100 0 53 0 15 0 0 0 20 50 0 20
'" open area 0 0 0 100 47 100 0 27 0 70 80 50 100 80
upstream P load lbslyr 234 38 000 000 000 000 000 000 8050 000 121 51 000 000 756 17 509 25
upstream oulflow ac-llIyr 577 53 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000 223 25 000 000 216277 2162 77
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P bad lbslyr 250 93 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9373 2778 13044 404 1511 509 25 47236
outflow volume ac-fl/yr 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921 23668 596 1714 2162 77 2172 19
oulflow p cone ppb 15620 209 99 448 45 19992 308 16 177 93 442 96 177 72 349 89 202 77 249 00 324 34 8663 8001
P removal efficiency '" 000 5334 036 005 733 1104 157 001 004 001 041 021 3265 839
vlawmo pond volume acre.ft 125 123 165 016 103 205 099 1 18 270 124 055 159 000 087
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpllallon Ulches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff totaJ p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 450 00 382 50 350 00 245 00 25000 32500 200 00 250 00
runoff ortho pIlotal P 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 046 040 055 057 051 061 057
unit runoff rtIyr 572 448 448 243 352 243 343 513 1318 565 284 346 243 284
umt export lbs/ac-y 058 046 048 011 026 011 035 044 104 031 016 025 011 016
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-llIyr 1353 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 1274 2921 1343 596 1714 000 942
upstream pond ac-IlIyr 577 53 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000 223 25 000 000 2162 77 216277
total nflow ...1lIyr 591 06 13'6 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19
outflow "'f\lyr 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 19405 2921 236 68 596 1714 2162 77 , 2172 19
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibs/yr 1655 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 1325 2779 894 405 1514 000 640
upstream pond Ibslyr 234 38 000 000 000 000 000 000 8050 000 121 51 000 000 756 17 509 25
total nfIow lbslyr 250 94 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 9374 2779 13045 405 1514 756 17 51565
net seclmentallon Ibs/yr 001 865 008 000 073 133 021 001 001 001 002 003 246 92 4329
outflow Ibs/yr 25093 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9373 2778 13044 404 1511 509 25 472 36
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 000 173 100 000 010 050 100 100 000 000 100 100 407 200
relabve volume nches 000 5009 000 002 390 061 000 000 000 000 000 000 50666666 67 9687
resldance Ime years 000 186 000 000 014 002 000 000 000 000 000 000 018 002
resilience Ime days 000 677 19 002 021 5271 823 003 000 001 000 008 002 8413 568
ovelflow IlIIA1 fl/yr 11821 093 1785330 196 070 2217 10678 64 19404795 1207 51453 5964 84 17136 00 2318 12853
nflow phos cone ppb 15620 450 02 450 02 200 01 332 52 200 01 450 02 17774 350 02 202 78 250 01 32502 12863 8734
outflow phos cone ppb 156 20 209 99 44845 199 92 308 16 177 93 44296 177 72 34989 202 77 24900 324 34 8663 8001
P reacllon rate 000 245 000 000 009 014 002 000 000 000 000 000 072 010
1-rp 100 047 100 100 093 089 098 100 100 100 100 100 067 092
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 450 00 38250 350 00 24500 250 00 325 00 200 00 250 00
runoff coefficl8nt 021 017 017 009 013 009 013 019 049 021 011 013 009 011
dllsolveclllotal P 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 046 040 055 057 051 061 057
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~NDsllI!elforJl!!k Lake- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ReceIVes oulflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R Portion of Legends and Liberty drallage Stillwater DIStrICt from LLD below Long Lake
Brasch November 1998 linked to dlV below Long Lake Future pond (Lllk 2 on SO HCO) check check check check check
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Reach wet volume 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
case label LL0-101 LLO-50 LLO-l02 LLD-52 50-201 50202 Reach 104 50-105 50-206 50-203 50-204 50-205 50.201 50-202
watershed area acrel 50 152 240 265 50 48 0001 417 224 205 55 39 50 48
baSil area acrel 0001 0001 0001 087 1 1 0001 068 0001 5 15 13 1 1
baSil volume acre-It 0001 0001 0001 4 0001 0001 0001 055 0001 8 2 15 2 19
% agnculurall8nd 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100
% Ildustnat 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mull family rei 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
% sllgle family rei 0 100 100 36 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0
% open area 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load Ibslyr 000 549 000 121 97 000 000 11333 326 2028 000 000 595 000 000
upatream outIIow ac-fI/yr 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 15409 273 2402 000 000 1485 000 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load lbaIyr 549 1241 10957 8111 1644 1578 11331 2028 2595 2076 595 1598 470 459
oulflow volume ac-rtlyr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 15409 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
oulflow p cone ppb 19965 288 86 449 71 233 62 448 06 44804 270 56 31058 31328 13801 14731 199 84 128 13 13038
P removal effICiency % 018 025 007 4416 044 044 002 30.82 011 6933 6727 3276 7153 7103
vlawmo pond volume lICAl-lt 094 053 830 205 125 120 000 197 060 513 138 135 125 120
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season PI'8CIpIlatIOll l\CI\el 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runo" total P ppb 200 00 45000 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 20000 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff oltho pIIotal p 061 040 040 040 010 010 061 040 051 010 010 040 010 010
U\1l1l\Jnotf Illyr 243 448 448 1005 324 324 243 613 346 324 324 448 324 324
un. expotl Ibllac-y 011 046 046 088 033 033 011 062 025 033 033 046 033 033
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-rtlyr 1013 568 8964 2219 1350 1296 000 2130 645 5535 1485 1457 1350 1296
upllream pond ac-fI/yr 000 1013 000 10S 44 000 000 15409 273 2402 000 000 1485 000 000
totalllftow ac-ft1yr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 15409 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
outflow IIc-ft/yr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 154 09 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 550 694 109 64 2328 1651 1585 000 2605 570 6770 1816 1782 1651 1585.
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 549 000 121 97 000 000 11333 326 2028 000 000 595 000 000
totalllflow Ibslyr 550 1244 109 64 14525 1651 1585 11333 2931 2598 6770 1816 2376 1651 1585
net ledmentatlOn IbsIyr 001 003 008 6414 007 007 002 903 003 4694 1222 779 1181 1126
outIIow Ibslyr 549 1241 10957 8111 1644 1578 11331 2028 2595 2076 595 1598 470 459
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 100 100 460 000 000 100 081 100 160 133 115 200 190
reletlVe volume Ilches 000 000 000 487 000 000 13333 070 000 390 364 278 400 396
resldance line yeal'l 000 000 000 003 000 000 000 002 000 014 013 OOS 015 015
residence line days 004 002 000 1144 003 003 000 836 001 5276 4916 1861 5407 5351
overflow rate fI/yr 1012500 1580220 89640 00 14670 1350 1296 15408767 3533 3047603 1101 990 2263 1350 1296
Ilflow phos cone ppb 200 01 28960 450 02 41872 450 02 450 02 27081 448 91 31363 450 02 450 02 297 21 450 02 45002
outflow phos cone ppb 199 65 288 86 449 71 233 82 448 06 448 04 270 56 31056 31328 13801 14731 19984 128 13 13038
P reactlOll rata 000 000 000 142 000 000 000 064 000 737 628 072 882 846
1-rp 100 100 100 056 100 100 100 069 100 031 033 067 028 029
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 200 00 45000 450 00 38600 450 00 45000 200 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 45000 450 00 450 00
I\Jnotr coemclent 009 017 017 037 012 012 009 023 013 012 012 017 012 012
d.lIOlvedJlotal P 061 040 040 040 010 010 081 040 051 010 010 040 010 010
PONOSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake ReceIVes outIlow from
W Walker July 1987. adapled by R Long Lake
Brasch November 1998 (Lllk 1 on SO HCD)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1
case label SO-207 SO-l SD-2 SD-3 SO-4 SD-8 SO-9 80-5 SD-301 SO-302 SO-303 SO-3032 Reach 303 SO-304
watershed area acres 1526 22 197 342 61 247 197 60 5 24 92 23 0001 269
bUll area acres 0001 065 0001 0001 0001 073 041 0001 01 1 0001 0001 0001 0001
NSIl volume acre-ll 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
% agnculuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Ildultnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mull family ras 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% sllgle family res 0 100 50 50 50 50 25 25 0 50 50 25 0 25
% open area 100 0 50 50 50 50 75 75 100 50 50 75 100 75
upstream p load IISIyr 18530 000 000 1501 2367 000 628 507 27 000 000 000 000 935 000
upstream outflow a~ 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711 2209 63 000 000 000 000 1114 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
ouUJow p load Ibslyr 202 08 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972 51777 055 610 231 039 932 469
oulflow volume ao-ftfyr 32669 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660
oulflow p cone ppb 227 59 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26 8564 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 30796 261 48
P removal effic:lllI1ey % 001 017 062 017 016 009 010 000 034 007 130 400 025 039
vlawmo pond volume acre-ft 286 076 053 091 016 066 045 136 009 064 025 005 000 061
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
leason preclpllatron IIches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
NnolllOt8l p ppb 200 00 450 00 32500 325 00 325 00 32500 262 50 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50
Nnolf 0l1h0 pJtolal P 061 040 051 051 051 051 056 056 061 051 051 056 061 056
untlNllOlf Wyr 243 448 346 346 346 346 294 294 243 346 346 294 243 294
un. export Ibslac-y 011 046 025 025 025 025 017 017 011 025 025 017 011 017
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnolf ac-ftfyr 3090 822 567 985 176 711 483 1472 101 691 265 056 000 660
upstream pond ac-ftfyr 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711 2209 63 000 000 000 000 11 14 000
totalllflow ao-ftfyr 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660
oulflow ac-ftIyr 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnolf Ibslyr 1680 1005 501 870 155 628 345 1050 055 611 234 040 000 471
upsfra8fll pond Ibllyr 18530 000 000 1501 2367 000 628 507 27 000 000 000 000 935 000
totalllflow Ibllyr 202 10 1005 501 2372 2523 628 973 517 77 055 611 234 040 935 471
net aedmentalJon Ibsfyr 001 002 003 004 004 001 001 000 000 000 003 002 002 002
outflow Ibllyr 202 08 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972 517 77 055 610 231 039 932 469
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 000 100 100 100 000 000 100 001 000 100 100 100 100
relative volume IIches 000 000 000 000 002 000 001 000 003 000 001 005 13333 000
rasldence line years 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
ralldenc:e tme days 000 004 008 002 001 005 003 000 036 005 014 065 003 006
ovetflow rate ftfyr 326691 70 1264 5673 60 23740 20 25497 00 974 2913 2224348 08 1013 691 2649 60 564 08 1113838 6597 23
IIf10w phos cone ppb 227 60 450 02 325 02 367 53 364 02 325 02 299 56 8564 200 01 325 02 325 02 26251 30874 262 51
outflow phos cone ppb 227 59 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26 8564 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 30796 261 48
P reac:tJOll rate 000 000 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 004 000 000
l-rp 100 100 099 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 099 096 100 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnolf total P calc: ppb 200 00 450 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50
Nnotr coefficllll1t 009 017 013 013 013 013 011 011 009 013 013 011 009 011
dlslO/vedJlo18/ P 061 0<40 051 051 051 051 056 056 061 051 051 056 061 056
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IIINDSI.elfotl!lk Lak'" "'lVerslOll'" - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R to
Brasch, November 1998 check McKuslCk McKuslCk Lake DIStnc\
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 Lake Ldy Lake (Lake Vol From SHE DIFS study)
case label SD-305 S[)..306 ML.1 ML-80 ML-2 ML-3 ML-4 ML-5 ML-6 ML-7 ML-6 ML-20 ML-21 ML-22
watershed _a acres 1081 124 498 580 16 2 108 63 68 10 461 96 52 29
baSil area acres 35 0001 29 52 0001 0001 0001 16 008 001 15 164 001 01
baSil voklme acre-ll 7 0001 87 744 0001 0001 0001 32 008 0001 45 32 0001 01
% agnculural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IlldustnaJ 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% multi family res 18 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Sllllle family res 47 63 100 45 0 50 100 100 50 100 100 50 0 50
% open area 35 37 0 21 100 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 100 50
upstream p load Ibllyr 1401 748 17 000 000 000 017 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057
upstreem outllow ac-flJyr 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibllyr 2832 78555 908 3294 017 066 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097
outflow volume ac-flI)fr 5431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189
outIIow P cone ppb 191 85 109 32 179 52 8859 19091 268 28 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 18883 17641 19760 18995
P removal effiCIlII1cy % 4342 000 6011 7641 455 306 000 5545 2768 147 5793 4572 120 2521
vtawmo pond voklme acre-ft 339 358 172 2757 003 005 037 022 018 035 159 026 010 008
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season lengI/I yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preC1fl1latlOll IIches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
IIlnoff total p ppb 362 50 357 50 45000 375 50 200 00 32500 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 32500 200 00 325 00
IIlnolf ortho pJlotal p 047 048 040 044 061 051 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051
un. IIlnolf IIIyr 408 372 448 616 243 346 448 448 346 448 448 346 243 348
un. export lbeIac-y 033 030 046 052 011 025 046 046 025 046 046 025 011 025
POND WATER BUDGETS
IIlnolf ac-ftlyr 3658 3847 1860 297 80 032 058 403 235 196 374 1722 276 105 084
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105
totalllllow ac-ftlyr 5431 2643 82 1860 29780 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189
outIlow ac-flI)fr 54 31 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
IIlnoff Ibllyr 3604 3738 2275 30395 018 051 493 288 173 457 2106 244 057 074
uptotream pond Ibllyr 1401 748 17 000 000 000 017 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057
totaIlIlftow lbllyr 5005 785 55 2275 303 95 018 088 3788 288 173 457 2558 244 057 130
nel sedmentallOll Ibllyr 2173 000 1368 232 25 001 002 000 160 048 007 1481 112 001 033
outflow Ibllyr 2832 785 55 908 7171 017 066 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 200 100 300 1431 100 100 100 200 100 010 300 195 010 100
relalNe volume IIches 517 000 1263 6745 008 005 001 3672 110 001 706 3125 003 323
residence Ime years 013 000 047 250 000 000 000 136 004 000 021 116 000 005
reSIdence Ime days 4704 000 170 72 91188 113 041 000 496 38 1491 010 7839 422 45 035 1933
ovelflow rate flI)fr 1552 2643820 07 641 573 324 00 900 00 301834 80 147 2448 373 50 1397 169 10530 1888
IIflow phos conc ppb 339 06 109 32 450 02 375 52 200 01 27674 4617 450 02 325 02 450 02 448 85 325 02 200 01 253 96
outflow phos conc ppb 191 85 109 32 17952 8859 190 91 268 28 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 188 83 17641 19760 18995
preacttonrata 136 000 378 1373 005 003 000 279 053 002 327 155 001 045
l-rp 057 100 040 024 095 097 100 045 072 099 042 054 099 075
LAND USE PARAMETERS
IIlnoff total P calc ppb 382 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 45000 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00
IIlnoff coefflClIlIlt 015 014 017 023 009 013 017 017 013 017 017 013 009 013
dlSsolved/total P 047 048 040 044 081 051 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051
PONDSIZE Model for McKusICk Lake
W Welker July 1987. adepted by R
Brasch. November 1998 Landlocked
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Landlocked
case label ML-23 ML-24 ML-25 SUBC-26 ML-27 ML-40 ML-41 ML-42 ML-43 ML-44 ML-31 ML-30 SUBC-45 SUBC-46
_letIhecl area acres 93 37 16 8 132 22 44 09 4 28 227 12 715 99
bUill araa acres 037 001 048 001 132 036 01 02 015 028 0001 028 0001 0001
baslll volume aere..fl 037 0001 048 0001 66 036 01 02 015 028 0001 05 0001 0001
" agncullura/ land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" IIdustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" mull family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
" mille family ras 100 75 50 50 66 25 50 50 60 50 10 15 100 84
" open area 0 25 50 50 34 75 50 50 40 50 90 85 0 0
upstreall\ P load IbsJyr 097 000 125 000 5199 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000
upstream outftow ac..fIIyr 189 000 122 000 328 15 000 054 1 81 207 000 000 000 000 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load IbsJyr 336 125 107 201 4047 027 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781
outflow volume ac-ftIyr 536 122 168 230 33231 054 1 81 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915
ou\fIow P cone ppb 23047 378 93 233 95 320 85 4480 18573 206 86 16533 177 98 21490 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30
P removal efficiency " 3570 273 3550 128 2789 2925 2709 2536 2391 3388 042 3375 023 016
vlawmo pond volume acre-II 032 011 004 021 039 005 012 002 011 007 046 025 247 363
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season praapUllOfl Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runolf Iolal p ppb 45000 387 50 325 00 32500 36500 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 22500 237 50 450 00 45000
runoff 0Ith0 pltol8l P 040 045 051 051 047 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040
umlrunoft lIIIyr 448 397 348 348 378 294 346 346 366 346 284 274 448 475
unit export Ibs/ac-y 046 035 025 025 031 017 025 025 029 025 013 015 046 048
POND WATER BUDGETS
runolf ac-ftIyr 347 122 046 230 416 054 127 026 122 081 498 274 2671 3915
upstream pond ac-ftIyr 189 000 122 000 32815 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000
toIaIllflow ac-ftIyr 536 122 168 230 33231 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915
outflow ac-ftIyr 536 122 168 230 33231 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 26 71 3915
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runolf IbsJyr 425 129 041 204 413 038 112 023 116 071 305 177 3266 4789
upstream pond Ibslyr 097 000 125 000 5199 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000
Iolalllllow lbslyr 522 129 166 204 5612 038 139 124 209 071 305 177 3266 4789
net sedmenlatlon Ibs/yr 186 004 059 003 1565 011 038 032 050 024 001 060 008 008
oulllow Ibslyr 336 125 107 201 4047 027 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 010 100 010 500 100 100 100 100 100 100 179 100 100
relatNe volume Ilches 288 002 2813 001 428 08 1802 213 2083 332 938 001 493 000 000
residence Ime years 007 000 028 000 020 067 006 010 005 035 000 018 000 000
resldenca Ime days 2519 030 104 00 o l1i 7249 243 54 2020 3533 1666 12674 007 6666 001 001
ovarftow rete ftIyr 1449 12238 351 230 40 2518 150 1807 1033 2191 288 4984 92 978 26705 25 3915054
IIlIow phos cone ppb 358 44 387 52 362 73 32502 6213 262 51 283 42 221 51 233 91 325 02 225 01 237 51 450 02 I 450 02
outflow phos cone ppb 23047 378 93 233 95 320 85 4480 18573 208 66 16533 17798 214 90 224 08 15736 448 97 I 449 30
P reacIlon rate 086 003 085 001 054 058 051 046 041 078 000 077 000 I 000
l-rp 064 097 064 099 072 071 073 075 076 066 100 066 100 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runolf Iolal P calc ppb 45000 387 50 325 00 325 00 36500 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 225 00 237 50 450 00 450 00
runolf coefflclenl 017 015 013 013 014 011 013 013 014 013 010 010 017 018
dlSSolvedl\Olal P 040 045 051 051 047 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"'In~ - ~naly"'uslCkllllLera~(19~Slnp'"
McKuslCk McKuslCk McKuSlCk ScenarIO Loadngs to McKuslCk L ,wi diversIOn,
Welland Weiland Lake AUAR Preferred OptIOn (NWL=852) wi wetland treatment and addl pondng
above 852 below 852 ML-47 Date 1-11-99 (ncludes field checked pond data)
Summary Stals
"NDsllII.lforIlLLa~
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Braacll, November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES
cese label
waltnhad area
basn area
basn volume
" agnculturalland
" nduIlnII
" mull family ras
" sngle family ntS
" open ....
upstream p IllacI
upstream outflow
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load
outIlow volume
outflow p cone
p ntmoval efIlclency
vlawmo pond volume
UNITS
acres
acres
acre-ft
Ibllyr
8C-fl/yr
Ibllyr
IIl>ftIyr
ppb
'"
IICRl-fl
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrw
season ~lIlIn IIldIes
Nnolf total p ppb
Nnolf lIflho p/tolal p
unlllUflOlf nJyr
unl! export Ibsllll>Y
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff
upstream pond
tolal nftow
outflow
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
NnoIf Ibalyr
upstream pond Ibalyr
total nfIow Ibllyr
nel aedmentalllln IbaIyr
outflow Ibalyr
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel
ntlatlVe volume nches
residence time years
residence Ime days
ov8lflow rate fl/yr
Ilflow phoa cone ppb
outflow phos cone ppb
p reaclJon rale
1-rp
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb
Nnoff coefIicIInt
dllsolvedllolal P
ac-fl/yr
ac-flIyr
ac-ftIyr
ac-ftIyr
SUBC-63
63
0001
0001
o
o
10
60
30
000
000
0001
24
10
o
o
o
o
100
807 54
2665 79
2153
2116
37422
021
196
78844
2665 79
108 54
261
000
0001
173
7
o
o
o
o
100
786 44
2665 79
771 02
2665 79
106 41
196
000
100 100 100
2700 2700 2700
37500 20000 200 00
046 061 061
403 243 243
034 011 011
2116 000 000
000 2665 79 2665 79
2118 2685 79 2665 79
2116 2665 79 2665 79
2157 000
000 807 54
2157 807 54
005 2111
2153 786 44
100 042
000 1333333 33
000 000
002 137
2116328 11107
37502 11145
37422 108 54
000 003
100 097
37500 200 00
015 009
046 061
0001
46
160
o
o
o
80
20
915 01
3088 41
M L watershed (eXllllmg condlllOns, pnt-dlVeralOn)
Dnd 234
Indract 673
Total 907 wa/Jake area ralIO
Walar area 67
GRAND TOTAL 974
M L watershed (poal-dlVeralOt\)
Drect
Indrect
Total
Water area
GRAND TOTAL
234
3.583
3,817
394
4,211
wsIIake area rellO
68961
308841
8215
2463
000
Agnculturel
Industnallcornm_1
Mulllamdy
" smgle family res
"'open area
P-COEFF RUNOFF COEFF
450 012
350 0488
450 0 227
450 0 166
200 0 09
100
2700
400 00
044
407
037
Noles CallbratlOl1 Nn for WILMS under 1996 conddions,
Actual wq for Lily Lake outflow, preclp II for 1998 water year
000
3088 41 Assumes McK Lake NWL IS about 852 and that dIVerted water
308841 passes through upperwalland for451bs Removal (llb/ac)
308841 Also assumes pond n Sbllwater(SD-305), 5 ponds n Grent Tnshp (SD-201-205)
o 00 Key for pond nfonnallon numeneal scripts
91501 1 - Both wet volume and area from HydroCad i1put
91501 2 - Pond area only from HydroCad Input (genaraly shows no wet volume)
225 40 3. WeI volume only from HydroCad IlpUl
689 61 4. Pond area from 200 scale topo maps
5 - Wet volume from field check
6 . Wet volume from as-bullls
o 40 3 46 7. Pond area, wet volume from OPH SWMP
933333 33 12732095498 - Volume, depth assumed
000 0 05 9. Volume from E Pe\er8 (estmated)
096 1891 field checked ponds checked In January, 1999
15409 8714
108 54 109 00
106 41 82 15
002 043
098 0 75
000
786 44
78644
1541
771 02
200 00
009
061
400 00
015
044
-
-
20
78
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
W~SCONStN LAKE MODEL SPREADSHEET
VERSION 2 01 - AUGUST 1996
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Although this model has been tested by WDNR, no warranty IS
expressed or Implied See users manual pnor model use
************* **********.*. .......***.**** ************* ******......** ************* .************ *** **
LAKE 10 McKuslck Lake, StIIlwater(NWL = 853, wI ponds}
To auto load wtrshd data, enter county 10, hold CTRL and type L
WATERSHED COUNTY IDENT NUMBER = 56 CO NAME St CroIX
************* ************* ...................."...** *A......""4"......&4* ************* ***41.&""'...41." _**"'........."""...... *** **
HYDROLOGIC AND MORPHOMETRIC MODULE
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ENGLISH METRIC
TRIB DRAINAGE AREA = 42110 Ac 1 70E+07 m^2
TOTAL UNIT RUNOFF = 87 In 0222 m
ANNUAL RUNOFF VOLUME = 3067 0 Ac-Ft 3 78E+06 m^3
LAKE SURFACE AREA <As> = 460 Ac 1 86E+05 m^2
LAKE VOLUME <V> = 205 0 Ac-ft 2.53E+05 m^3
LAKE MEAN DEPTH <z> = 4 46 Ft 136 m
PRECIP - EVAP = 62 In 016 m
HYDRAULIC LOADING = 3090 8 Ac-FtJYr 381E+06 m^3lVr
AREAL WATER LOAD <qs> = 6 72E+01 FtJYr 2 05E+01 mlYr
LAKE FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1508 IVr Tw= 007 Yr
**********'*** **aIoAA.A"............" ***.....***** ************* "".......A....".A**** ************* ****AAA........."...... *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Page 1
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
************* .-.............** ******'l1t.*.:A:..... .************ ......***_.... ******_***... *..._........_ 'II" 'II..
PHOSPHORUS LOADING MODULE
LAND USE
=================================================================
ROW CROP AG
MIXED AG
PASTURE/GRASS
HD URBAN
MD URBAN
RURAL RES
WETLANDS
FOREST
OTHER LAND USE 1
OTHER LAND USE 2
LAKE SURFACE
AREA
(AC)
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
4211 0
00
460
-LOADING (KglHa- Yr)-
MOST
LIKELY
150
100
030
130
050
010
010
009
025
000
027
LOW
050
080
010
100
040
005
010
005
015
000
010
-----------
POINT SOURCE WATER LOADING (m^3Nr) =
POINT SOURCE PH OS (KgfYr) 0 00
SEP TANK OUTPUT(kg/cp-yr) 030
# capita-years = 0 00
% P RETAINED BY SOIL = 98
SEP TANK LOADING (KgfYr) 000
LOADING
HIGH PERCENT
300 00
140 00
050 00
200 00
080 00
o 25 0 0
010 00
018 00
035 988
000 00
100 12
*
o OOE+OO
000 000
050 080
*
00
*
*
*
-----------------
90 80
000 000
*
TOTAL LOADINGS (Lb) =
TOTAL LOADINGS (Kg) =
*
00
*
--------..------------..-..-
5 68E+02 9 50E+02 1 36E+03
2 57E+02 4 31 E+02 6 15E+02
*
100 0
1000
*
*
AREAL LOADING{Lb/Ac-Yr) = 123E+01 207E+01 295E+01
AREAL LOADING(mg/m^2-yr)= 1 38E+03 2 32E+03 3 30E+03
% TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION = C
*
*
*
*
To view a graph of phosphorus Inputs expressed as percentages
of the total phosphorus load. select the LOAD GRAPH tab When you
are finslshed VIeWIng the graph. select the WILMS200 tab
************* ****"1\4.\........."'... ************* ************* .."'...A.""'A........."A ****.1:"""'.\.\.&.1." ************* *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
PHOSPHORUS PREDICTION MODULE
**********..* ************* **..********* *******.***** ************* *******........ ************* *** ***
=================================================================
THE OBSERVED SPRING TOTAL PHOSPHORUS =
THE OBSERVED GROWING SEASON PHOSPHORUS :
o mg/m^3
110 mg/m^3
---------------------
Enter the spring and/or the growing season P concentrabon
The lake models predict eIther an SPO or a GSM P eoncentrabon
A predIcted phosphorus concentration will appear only for those
models where the observed value has been entered An "NA" IS
returned If a model IS not calculated
Spring Overturn P conc = SPO, Growing Season Mean P cone = GSM
------------------
LAKE PHOSPHORUS MODELS
PREDICTED
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
(mg/m^3)
------------------------
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR MODEL (GSM)
45 75 107
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN,1981,ARTIFICAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
4 RECKHOW, 1979, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (GSM)
38 64 91
5 RECKHOW, 1977, ANOXIC LAKE MODEL (GSM)
59 99 141
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 m1yr (GSM)
47 78 111
7 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs > 50 mlyr (GSM)
#N/A #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER 1977, GENERAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
#N/A #N/A #N/A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO and GSM)
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL {SPO)
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs.:: 1 ~ rniyr #N1A
p ~!:TE:-~T,0N COEFF <R> ~s >= 10 m1yr 047
******************.....*****~.dr.......*'******************'*****.A AJi A A A" *-' i..
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
75
#N/A
#N/A
64
99
78
#N1A
#N/A
76
#N1A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
...*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Page 3
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
.."******************************************************4AA..'.Aa***
.-
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS MODULE
=================================================================
LAKE RESPONSE MODEL
PREDICTED
MINUS
OBSERVEIPERCENT
(mg/m^3) DIFF
70 PERCENT
CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR 75 #DIVlOI
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A
4 RECKHOW, 1979 GENERAL -46 -42
5 RECKHOW, 1977 ANOXIC -11 -10
6 RECKHOW, 1977 qs<50mlyr -32 -29
7 RECKHOW, 1977 qs>50m/yr #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL #N/A #N/A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 21 38
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER #N/A #N/A
<= Range W1thm which 95% of the obselVatlons should fall
See users manual discussIon on the use of these models
************* *A...4A....U.....u,** ************* ************* .................'-1........\..."'... A......."'....\4"......*** AAAAA...AAA........ *** ***
47
#N/A
#N/A
39
64
48
#N/A
#N/A
108
#N/A <=
#N/A <=
95
141
115
#N1A
#N/A
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
..**********. **********.*. ************* ******.****** ************* **********'*** ************* *** "'**
PARAMETER RANGE MODULE
Model Input values MUST be within the ranges listed below
WILMS displays FIT If Inputs sabsfy conditions, NO FIT If not
PARAMETERS
=================================================================
.************ ***********'** ************* ************* ******'******* ************* .......**.*** *** ***
AREAL WATER LOADING <qs=zITw> = 205E+01 m1yr
INFLOW PHOSPHORUS CONC <LTwlz> = 0113 mgll
MEAN DEPTH <z> = 1 36 m
FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1508 /yr
HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME <Tw> = 0 07 yr
AREAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING <L> = 231559 mglm^2-yr
P = PREDICTED IN LAKE PHOS CONCENTRATION mglm^3
=================================================================
Model data base size
1 WALKER, 1985 RESERVOIR MODEL
15<z<58m 013<Tw<191yr
0014 < L Tw/z < 1 047 mgll
<NO FIT>
P=
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P < 2600 mglm^3 30< L < 7600 mg/m^2"'Jr #NlA
02< z <307 m 0001< P <183/yr P=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 ARTIFICIAL LA(E MODEL
6< P <1500 mg/m^3 40< L <820,000 mg/m^2Jyr #N/A
06< z <59 m 0019< P <1800Nr P=
4 RECKHOW, 1979 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P <135 mg/m^3 70< L <31,400 mg/m^2-yr
075< qs <187 m/yr
<;IT>
'7=
5 RECKHOW,1977 ANOXIC LAKE MODEL
17< P < 610 mglm^3 0 024< LTw/z< 0 621mgll
<FIT>
P=
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 m1yr
P < 60 mg/m^3 L Tw/z < 298 mgll
<NO FIT>
P=
7 RECKHOW, 1977 LAKES WITH qs > 50 mlyr
P < 135 mg/m^3 L Tw/z < 0 178 mgll
Tw < 025 yr z < 13 m
#NIA
P=
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
P < 900 mg/m^3 L Tw/z < 1 0 mgJl
#N/A
P=
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
NOT AVAILABLE
<FIT>
P=
*
*
*
(41)
*
*
75
*
*
(290)
*
*
#N/A
*
*
(433)
#N/A
*
*
*
*
(47)
64
*
*
*
*
(21)
99
*
*
*
(33)
78
*
*
*
(.<\)
#N/~
*
*
*
*
(105)
#N/A
*
*
*
76
*
*
10 DILLON, RIGLER, KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (15)
P < 15 mglm^3 107 < L < 2210 mg/m^2-yr #N/A
1 5< qs < 223 mlyr 0 21 < P < 631yr P= #N/A
...*****.......... **********...... ****'**........ ************* __AiAA"..............." .....***..*** ************* .. ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Page 5
PONDSIZE Model for MeKuslCk Lake Walershed InfonnallOll from HydroCad mode' prepared Outflow from AnalysIS MeKuslCk lake DIVersIOn Impact (1996 WilMS Inpul) ReceIVes flOw
W Walker July 1987, adapled by R by Ene: Pelers (BRA) for Sbllwater AUAR OPH east of Hwy 5 Scenano loadUlgs to MeKuslCk l ,wI dl\lerslOll. OPH east of I-
Brasch, November 1998 Oak ParII HII!IIIlI Sub DlSlncI Market Place Subdlstnc:l New optlOll (NWl=853) wI addl Ponds but no wetland treat field checked
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 4,8 field checked 1 4 8 4,8 48
case label OPH-13 OPH-14 OPH-12 OPH-150PH-11 MP-12 MP-121 Reaeh-13 MP-99 MP-1 Mp-2 MP-98 MP-5 MP-7
watemled _a acres 59 64 29 38 78 96 99 0001 234 798 212 187 154 758
basil area acres 345 097 11 07 38 03 08 0001 12 04 0001 044 015 33
bam vollme acre-fI 67 29 2 26 131 064 16 0001 48 04 0001 088 03 132
,. agnculuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,. Ildustnal 0 0 0 100 66 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100
,. mull family res 0 0 0 0 11 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
,. Ingle flunlly rei 100 100 100 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,. open erea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream P load Ibs/yr 000 000 000 647 5086 000 000 574 000 1060 000 000 1180 201 69
up.....am outflow ac-flJyr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 2053 350 10
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibslyr 1258 1308 641 2520 6680 289 286 573 1060 8412 2210 1180 2295 18642
outflow volume ae.ftIyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 166 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744 433 33
outflow p cone ppb 21008 201 38 21988 17640 14797 21653 207 84 21150 151 74 27312 349 29 21141 22547 156 28
p removaletrlCllncy % 5332 5525 5114 4542 4499 5189 5382 030 5665 1047 021 3960 1772 3363
vJawmo pond vollme acre-II 204 221 100 386 626 045 047 000 238 811 216 190 157 771
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
sealOlllength yr. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pI'ICllIlIatlOn lIChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
rund total p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 45000 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 35000 35000
IUnof\' 0Ith0 pIloteI P 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
un. IUnd IlIyr 448 448 448 1318 1040 613 613 613 1318 1318 1318 1318 1318 1318
un. expo/1 Ibs/ec-y 046 046 046 104 090 062 062 062 104 104 104 104 104 104
POND WATER BUDGETS
rund IIC-ft/yr 2204 2390 1083 4172 6761 490 506 000 2569 8762 2328 2053 1691 8323
upstream pond ac-flJyr 000 000 000 1063 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 2053 350 10
totaIl'lfIow ac-flJyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 16810 490 506 996 2569 11331 2326 2053 3744 433 33
oulllow IIC-ft/yr 2204 2390 1083 5256 168 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744 433 33
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
IUnd Ibs/yr 2695 2924 1325 3969 7057 600 618 000 2444 8336 2215 1953 1609 7918
upstream pond Ibs/yr 000 000 000 647 5086 000 000 574 000 1060 000 000 11 80 201 69
Iolalllllow Ibslyr 2695 2924 1325 4617 121 43 600 618 574 2444 9395 2215 1953 2788 280 87
net sedmenta1lon Ibs/yr 1437 1615 678 2097 5463 311 333 002 1385 984 005 774 494 9445
outflow Ibslyr 1258 1308 647 2520 6680 289 286 573 1060 8412 2210 1180 2295 18642
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 194 299 182 400 345 213 200 100 400 100 100 200 200 400
relabve volume Ilehes 821 328 499 181 523 352 854 5286 504 012 000 116 048 428
residence Ime years 030 012 018 005 008 013 032 000 019 000 000 004 001 003
residence tll1ll days 11097 4428 6740 1945 2879 4764 11550 004 6819 129 002 1564 292 11 12
ovelflow rale ft/yr 639 2464 985 7508 4371 1634 632 9960 14 2141 283 28 23277 60 4667 24961 13131
I'If1ow plio. cone ppb 45002 450 02 45002 323 20 268 97 45002 450 02 212 13 350 02 30506 350 02 350 02 27401 238 47
outflow phos cone ppb 21008 201 38 21988 17640 14797 21653 207 84 21150 151 74 273 12 349 29 21141 22547 15828
P reactJOn rate 245 276 214 152 149 224 252 000 301 013 000 109 026 076
1-rp 047 045 049 055 055 048 046 100 043 090 100 060 062 066
LAND USE PARAMETERS
IUnof\' total P calc ppb 45000 45000 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 45000 350 00 350 00 35000 350 00 350 00 350 00
rund coetIIc:IInl 017 017 017 049 039 023 023 023 049 049 049 049 049 049
dlSSoIved/lotalP 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~DS"e1fOr IlL Lak"'m - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -
Lake Elmo SubdlStnct
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R 1wy5 depth as rec by EP depths for LE-7 & 4 rec by EP
Brasch, November 1998 field checked field checked fl8ld checked check check check Legends and Liberty Dev (loI
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 2 4,8 4,8 Pond 10 2,9 2 2 2 2,9 2,9 2 2 1
case label MP.l1 MP-8 MP-9 MP-14 (Rch-l0) LE-l LE-3 LE-5 LE-6 LE-7 LE-4 LE-8 LLD-32 LLD.33
watershed area acres 772 349 1474 129 258 366 45 99 329 91 1059 325 9 29
baSil area acres 027 035 3 06 23 34 03 048 0001 35 175 0001 065 065
baSil voklme acre..fl 0001 0001 75 06 69 68 0001 0001 0001 35 35 0001 0001 26
'lit agn::ulluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'lit Ildustnal 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 89 0 34 0 0
'lit mull family res 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
'lit IIllgle family res 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 100
'lit open _a 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 11 26 64 0 0
upstream p load lbaIyr 000 3521 5696 000 257 31 000 000 000 000 361 6474 5881 000 561
upstream outflow ac-flIyr 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279 000 460
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 3521 5696 6184 905 234 38 264 049 109 361 6052 5881 6977 561 755
outflow volume ec..fllyr 2883 4666 101 71 1416 <;7753 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 15913 460 1543
outflow P cone ppb 449 33 449 14 223 70 235 01 14932 131 11 199 75 19985 19947 228 09 151 53 161 32 44917 180 10
P removaleftlcl8llCY % 015 010 5025 3286 1755 3445 013 008 027 2968 4189 001 019 5996
vlawmo pond volume acre-ft 267 165 510 131 262 069 008 019 062 842 323 151 043 100
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
sealOR lenglh yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pr8CIpdallon Ilches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
NnotI total P ppb 450 00 450 00 45000 350 00 350 00 20000 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 247 00 450 00 450 00
NnotI ortho pilotal P 040 040 040 040 040 061 061 061 061 042 045 053 040 040
URiI Nnolf nJyr 448 613 448 1318 1318 243 243 243 243 1199 395 604 613 448
un. export lbsIac-y 046 062 046 104 104 011 011 011 011 091 034 034 062 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-ftIyr 2883 1783 5505 1416 2833 741 091 200 666 9095 3485 1634 460 1083
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279 000 460
tOlelllftow ac-ftlyr 2883 4666 101 71 1416 577 53 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 15913 460 1543
outflow ac-ftIyr 2883 4666 101 71 1416 577 53 741 091 200 666 9762 142 79 159 13 460 1543
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 3527 2180 6734 1348 2695 403 050 109 362 8245 3647 1097 562 1325
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 3521 5696 000 257 31 000 000 000 000 361 64 74 5881 000 561
totallRftow lba/yr 3527 5702 12430 1348 284 26 403 050 109 362 8606 101 21 6978 562 1886
net sedmenlallOR Ibslyr 005 006 6246 443 4987 139 000 000 001 2555 4240 001 001 1131
outflow Ibslyr 3521 5696 6184 905 234 38 264 049 109 361 6052 58 81 6977 561 755
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 000 000 250 100 300 200 000 000 100 100 200 100 000 400
relative volume lIlChes 000 000 368 114 658 2477 003 001 000 104 2712 000 001 648
residence Ime years 000 000 007 004 001 092 000 000 000 004 025 000 000 017
residence Ime days 001 001 2691 1546 436 334 88 040 018 005 1309 8947 000 008 6151
overflow rale ftIyr 106 79 13331 3390 2361 251 10 218 304 418 6662 25 2789 816 15913403 707 2374
Ilftow pIIos cone ppb 450 02 449 59 449 62 350 02 181 09 200 01 200 01 200 01 200 01 324 37 260 77 16134 450 02 449 77
outflow phos cone ppb 449 33 449 14 223 70 235 01 14932 13111 199 75 19985 19947 228 09 151 53 161 32 44917 180 10
P reaclJCln rale 000 000 203 073 026 080 000 000 000 060 124 000 000 374
1-rp 100 100 050 067 082 066 100 100 100 070 058 100 100 040
LAND USE PARAMETE:RS
Nnoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 35000 350 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 20000 333 50 385 00 24700 450 00 450 00
Nnoff coeftlcl8nl 017 023 017 049 049 009 009 009 009 044 015 022 023 017
dlSlloIvedllolel P 040 040 040 040 040 061 061 061 061 042 045 053 040 040
PONDSIZE Model for McKuSlCk Lake
W Walker July 1887, adapted by R
Bresc:ll, November 1988 'lIs1 of Long Lake)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 1 1 Landlocked 2 2 1 1 << 1 1
case label LLD-34 LlD-35 LlD-36 LlD-371 LLD-37 LLD-38 LLD-39 LLD-40 LLD-41 LLD-42 LLD-43 LLC-60 LLD-44 LLC-45
watershed area acres 374 44 9 76 76 55 15 26 126 141 239 73 458 157
baslll area acres 1 075 08 0001 01 026 04 086 07 09 0001 0001 19 033
buill volume acre-ft 62 075 3 0001 0001 0001 02 14 32 04 0001 0001 10 087
% agnculuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% lIIdustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mull family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'llo mgle family res 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100
% open area 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load lbslyr 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674 000 000 248 50
upstream outflow lIC-ftIyr 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050 000 000 114303
OUTPUT VARIABLES
oulflow p load Ibslyr 994 113 054 340 400 649 852 020 209 674 1762 326 248 50 25351
oulflow volume ac-Il/)'r 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 1148 89
oulflow P cone ppb 12440 253 56 109 72 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 138 79 14718 236 27 333 69 44023 7999 8118
P removal effICIenCY 'llo 5966 4386 4514 210 049 027 1630 3161 6483 2100 024 218 4086 084
vlawmo pond volume acre-ft 129 015 017 026 026 019 003 005 044 049 083 025 722 054
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpllatlllO lIIChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
N/lotJtolalp ppb 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 45000 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 399 50 450 00
tunOff Of1ho pIIotsl p 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 035 040
uml runoff IIII'tr 448 448 243 448 448 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 673 448
un. export Ibslac-y 046 046 011 046 046 046 011 011 048 046 046 046 061 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
N/lotJ lIC-ftIyr 1397 164 182 284 284 205 030 053 471 527 893 273 7797 586
upstream pond ac:-Il/)'r 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050 000 1065 06 114303
totallllflow ac-Il/)'r 2940 164 182 264 466 872 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 1148 89
oulflow ac-Il/)'r 2940 164 182 284 466 872 866 053 523 1050 1943 273 114303 114889
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
IUnoff Ibslyr 1709 201 099 347 347 251 017 029 576 644 1092 334 8467 717
upstream pond IbsIyr 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674 000 335 52 248 50
totalnftow IbsIyr 2464 201 099 347 402 651 779 029 595 853 1766 334 420 19 255 67
net sedmantabon Ibslyr 1470 088 045 007 002 002 127 009 386 179 004 007 17169 215
outflow Ibslyr 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 674 1762 326 248 50 25351
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 620 100 375 100 001 000 050 163 457 044 100 100 392 264
relatIVe volume nclles 1198 1232 4444 001 001 001 1778 7179 1836 205 000 001 5264 401
residence Ime years 021 046 165 000 000 000 002 266 061 004 000 000 013 000
residence Ime days 7698 16658 600 82 013 008 005 843 970 56 223 22 1391 002 013 4854 028
overflow rate ftlyr 2940 219 228 2838 60 4661 2583 2166 061 748 1167 1942560 2726 55 2946 ' 3481 49
Illlow phos cone ppb 30836 450 02 200 01 450 02 31696 356 60 330 80 200 01 41851 299 09 334 50 450 02 135 25 8187
outflow phos cone ppb 12440 253 56 10972 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 136 79 147 18 236 27 333 69 440 23 7999 81 18
P reacllon rate 367 138 150 002 000 000 023 068 524 034 000 002 117 001
1-rp 040 056 055 098 100 100 084 068 035 079 100 098 059 099
LAND USE PARAMETERS
IUnoff total P celc ppb 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 399 50 450 00
IUnoff coeffJclenl 017 017 009 017 017 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 025 017
d.solllad/lolal P 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_NDS'-elfor~l8~ - - - ~utnoIIIM.LD - - - - - - - - - -
W Walker July 1987. 8dapled by R west of LL (Link 3 on LL HCD)
Brasch, November 1998 Long Lake-Sl03, S105, Sl06 and linked watersheds depth as rec by EP
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 Long L Long L Long L Dummy 2 1 1 1 1 1 29 1
case label LLD-31 DII'8cl30 DII'8c\47 DII'ect46 LongL LL-1 LL-2 LL-3 LL-4 LL-5 LL-6 LL-7 LL-8 Reech-9
watershed area acres 14 207 81 138 0001 152 77 234 7 96 182 273 45 39
besll .... acres 015 0001 0001 0001 0001 2 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 24 0001 0001
baSil volume acre-fl 056 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 48 0001 0001
'" agnculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" IldUltnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" mull family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" slIllIle family res 100 0 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
" open area 0 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p 108d IbsJyr 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412 000 3667 000 199
upstream outflow ae-tlIyr 000 000 000 000 1202 19 000 000 855 000 1991 000 3029 000 168
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 000 227 363 151 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844 824 2430 199 370
outfIowvoklme ac-fl/yr 523 419 303 279 1202 19 568 288 1729 281 2349 680 4049 168 314
outflow P conc ppb 19550 19915 44115 19873 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 445 31 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53
P removal efflClOncy '" 5656 043 197 064 000 007 207 036 226 026 090 5055 341 187
vlawmo pond voklme acro-fl 048 039 028 026 000 053 027 081 024 033 063 094 016 013
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yre 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpJlatlO/1 Ilches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff 10181 p ppb 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 45000 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
NnolJ 0I1h0 pItotal p 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
unit runoff rn/yr 448 243 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448 448
un. export Ibs/ae-y 046 011 046 011 011 046 046 046 046 046 046 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-fIIyr 523 419 303 279 000 568 288 874 261 359 680 1020 168 146
upstream pond ae-tlIyr 000 000 000 000 120219 000 000 855 000 1991 000 3029 000 168
totalllftow ac-flIyr 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349 680 4049 168 314
outflow ae-tlIyr 523 419 303 279 1202 19 568 288 1729 261 2349 680 4049 168 314
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnoff IbsJyr 640 228 370 152 000 694 352 1069 320 439 831 1247 206 178
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412 000 3667 000 199
IoI8lllftow lbslyr 640 228 370 152 277 38 694 352 2107 320 2851 831 4915 206 377
net sedmentallon IbsJyr 640 001 007 001 000 000 007 008 007 008 008 2484 007 007
outflow Ibslyr 227 363 151 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844 824 2430 199 370
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 373 100 100 100 100 000 100 100 100 100 100 200 100 100
relahve volume Ulches 289 001 001 001 13333 000 001 000 001 001 000 1271 002 002
rasldence llIlle years 011 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 012 000 000
resldance lime days 3909 009 012 013 000 006 013 002 014 002 005 4327 022 012
overflow rate fl/yr 3486 4191 75 3025 35 2794 50 1202191 81 284 2875 95 17293 05 261450 2349315 6797 70 1687 168075 313740
IIftow phos conc ppb 450 02 200 01 450 02 200 01 8489 450 02 450 02 448 37 450 02 448 49 450 02 44661 450 02 44181
outflow phos cone ppb 19550 199 15 44115 19873 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 44531 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53
P re8c\Jon rate 300 000 002 001 000 000 002 000 002 000 001 207 004 002
1-fll 043 100 098 099 100 100 098 100 098 100 099 049 097 098
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff 10181 P calc ppb 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 45000 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff coefficlent 017 009 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 017 017 017 017 017
d18solvedltol8t P 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 040
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake ReceIVes outflow ReceIVes outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R from MP from OPH. LE
BnIsc:h. November 1998 (link 1 on LL HCD) (Llllk 2 on LL HCD)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 1 1 2 1 no entry (HC!: 1 2 2
case label LL-15 LL-14 LL-13 LL-12 LL-11 LL-3O LL-20 LL-21 LL-22 LL-23 Dr-10 0..-16 Long Lake WMA Pond
watershed area acres 284 355 478 86 378 1095 374 298 266 285 252 595 0001 398
ballll area acres 5 142 0001 089 158 1 0001 0001 242 046 0001 0001 933 169
ballll voklme acre-ft 0001 248 0001 0001 18 05 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 380 338
% agnculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Ildustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 30 0 0 0 0
% mull family res 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IlIIgle family res 25 100 100 0 53 0 15 0 0 0 20 50 0 20
% open area 0 0 0 100 47 100 0 27 0 70 80 50 100 80
upstream p load Ibslyr 234 38 000 000 000 000 000 000 8050 000 12151 000 000 75817 509 25
upstream outflow ac-fllyr 577 53 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000 22325 000 000 2162 77 2162 77
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outllow P load IbsIyr 250 93 757 2178 095 928 1072 1288 9373 2778 13044 404 1511 509 25 47238
outftow vokIme ac-ftIyr 59106 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 19405 2921 238 68 596 1714 2162 77 217219
outflow p cone ppb 15820 209 99 448 45 199 92 308 16 177 93 442 96 177 72 349 89 202 77 249 00 324 34 8863 8001
P removal elliaency % 000 5334 035 005 733 1104 157 001 004 001 041 021 3265 839
vlawmo pond volume acre-II 125 123 165 018 103 205 099 118 270 124 055 159 000 087
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpllabon ilches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
RlnotJ total p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 33250 200 00 45000 38250 350 00 245 00 250 00 32500 200 00 25000
RlnotJ ClItIo pJIotal p 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 046 040 055 057 051 061 057
un. Rlnoff n/yr 572 448 448 243 352 243 343 513 1318 565 284 346 243 284
un. export Ibs/ac-y 058 048 046 011 026 011 035 044 104 031 016 025 011 016
POND WATER BUDGETS
Rlnoff ac.fIIyr 1353 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 1274 2921 1343 596 1714 000 942
upstream pond ac-ftIyr 577 53 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000 223 25 000 000 216277 216277
totaIlnftow ac.fIIyr 591 06 1328 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19
outllow ac-llIyr 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1088 194 05 2921 236 68 596 1714 2162 77 2172 19
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runotJ Ibslyr 1655 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 1325 2779 894 405 1514 000 640
upstream pond Ibslyr 234 38 000 000 000 000 000 000 8050 000 121 51 000 000 758 17 509 25
totalllfbw Ibslyr 250 94 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 9374 2779 13045 405 1514 758 17 51565
nelsedmenlabon Ibslyr 001 885 008 000 073 133 021 001 001 001 002 003 246 92 4329
outflow IbsIyr 250 93 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9373 2778 13044 404 1511 509 25 47236
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean deplh feel 000 173 100 000 010 050 100 100 000 000 100 100 407 200
relahve volume Ilehes 000 5009 000 002 390 061 000 000 000 000 000 000 50666666 67 9687
residence Ime years 000 188 000 000 014 002 000 000 000 000 000 000 01B 002
residence Ime days 000 67719 002 021 5271 823 003 000 001 000 006 002 6413 568
ov8fflow rate IIIyr 11B 21 093 17853 30 196 070 2217 1067B 64 19404795 1207 51453 5964 84 1713600 231B 12853
Ilflow pIIos cone ppb 158 20 450 02 45002 200 01 332 52 200 01 450 02 177 74 350 02 202 7B 25001 32502 12863 8734
oulllow pIlos cone ppb 15620 209 99 448 45 19992 30816 177 93 442 96 177 72 34989 202 77 24900 324 34 B663 8001
P reactlOll rale 000 245 000 000 009 014 002 000 000 000 000 000 072 010
1-rp 100 047 100 100 093 OB9 098 100 100 100 100 100 087 092
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Rlnoff total P celc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 45000 38250 350 00 245 00 250 00 325 00 200 00 250 00
runoff coefflClllnl 021 017 017 009 013 009 013 019 049 021 011 013 009 011
dllsolvedllolal P 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 048 040 055 057 051 061 057
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_OND~elf~lCk~ - - - - - - Re~\fIoW- - - - - - - -
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R Porllon of Legends and Liberty drainage Stlllwatar 01Stnct from LLO below Long Lake
Brasch, November 1998 IIIIked to dN below Long Lake Future pond (Lllk 2 on SO HCO) check check check check check
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Reach wet volume 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
case label LLO.l01 LLD-50 LL0-102 LLD-52 80-201 50202 Reach 104 50-10550-206 50-203 50.204 80-205 80-201 80.202
watershed area acres 50 152 240 265 50 48 0001 417 224 205 55 39 50 48
baSil area acres 0001 0001 0001 087 1 1 0001 068 0001 5 15 13 1 1
basin volume acra-It 0001 0001 0001 4 0001 0001 0001 055 0001 8 2 15 2 19
% agriculluralland 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 100 100
% lRduslnal 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mulb family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0
% sl1gle fam~y res 0 100 100 36 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 100 0 0
% open area 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
upstream P load IbsIyr 000 549 000 121 97 000 000 11333 326 2028 000 000 595 000 000
upstream oulllow ac-tlIyr 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 154 09 273 2402 000 000 1485 000 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibs/yr 549 1241 10957 81 11 1644 1578 11331 2028 2595 2076 595 1598 470 459
outllow volume ac-tlIyr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1298 154 09 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
outflow P cone ppb 199 65 288 86 449 71 233 82 44806 448 04 27056 31058 313 28 13801 14731 19984 12813 130 38
P removal elf"ICIlIIlCY % 018 025 007 4416 044 044 002 3082 011 6933 6727 3276 7153 7103
vlawmo pond volume acra-It 094 053 830 205 125 120 000 197 060 513 138 135 125 120
ASSUMEOEXPORTFACTOR8
season length yra 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preClpllat10R I1ches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
NnolJ total p ppb 200 00 450 00 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 45000 45000 450 00 450 00
NnoIf ortho pJtotal P 061 040 040 040 010 010 061 040 051 010 010 040 010 010
und NnolJ I1Iyr 243 448 448 1005 324 324 243 613 346 324 324 448 324 324
und export Ibslac-y 011 046 048 088 033 033 011 062 025 033 033 046 033 033
POND WATER BUDGETS
IUIlOff ac-ftlyr 1013 568 8984 2219 1350 1296 000 2130 645 5535 1485 1457 1350 1296
upstream pond ac-fl/yr 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 154 09 273 2402 000 000 1485 000 000
totalll1llow ac-fl/yr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 15409 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
oulllow ac-ftIyr 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 154 09 2402 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runolJ Ibs/yr 550 694 109 64 2328 1651 1585 000 2605 570 6770 1816 1782 1651 1585
upstream pond IbsIyr 000 549 000 121 97 000 000 11333 326 2028 000 000 595 000 000
totalll1llow IbsIyr 550 1244 109 64 145 25 1651 1585 11333 2931 2598 6770 1816 2376 1651 1585
net sedmenlatJon Ibs/yr 001 003 008 6414 007 007 002 903 003 4694 1222 779 1181 1126
outflow Ibs/yr 549 1241 109 57 8111 1644 1578 11331 2026 2595 2076 595 1598 470 459
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 100 100 460 000 000 100 081 100 160 133 115 200 190
relawe volume lIehes 000 000 000 487 000 000 13333 070 000 390 364 278 400 396
residence lJme years 000 000 000 003 000 000 000 002 000 014 013 005 015 015
residence Une days 004 002 000 1144 003 003 000 836 001 5276 4916 1861 5407 5351
overflow rate ftIyr 1012500 15802 20 8964000 146 70 1350 1296 15408767 3533 3047603 1107 990 2263 1350 1296
IIIIIow phos conc ppb 200 01 28960 450 02 41872 450 02 450 02 27061 448 91 31363 450 02 450 02 297 21 450 02 450 02
outflow phos conc ppb 19965 268 86 449 71 233 82 448 06 448 04 27056 31058 31328 13801 14731 19984 12813 13038
P reacbon rate 000 000 000 142 000 000 000 064 000 737 628 072 882 846
1-rp 100 100 100 056 100 100 100 069 100 031 033 067 028 029
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnoff totel P ceJc ppb 200 00 450 00 450 00 38600 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 32500 450 00 45000 45000 450 00 450 00
NnoIf coeIfiCIent 009 017 017 037 012 012 009 023 013 012 012 017 012 012
dlSsolvedltotel P 061 040 040 040 010 010 061 040 051 010 010 040 010 , 010
PONOSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake ReceIVes outflow from
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R Long Lake
Brescll November 1998 (lI'Ik 1 on SO HCO)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1
_label SO.207 S0-1 S0-2 S0-3 SD-4 SO-8 SD-9 SD-5 S0-301 SD-302 SO.303 S0-3032 Reach 303 SD-304
watershed area acres 1526 22 197 342 61 247 197 60 5 24 92 23 0001 269
besn area acres 0001 065 0001 0001 0001 073 041 0001 01 1 0001 0001 0001 0001
besn vokIme acre.ft 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
'l6 agnculura/ land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'l6 i1duslnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" mulb family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" sllgle family res 0 100 50 50 50 50 25 25 0 50 50 25 0 25
'l6 open area 100 0 50 50 50 50 75 75 100 50 50 75 100 75
upstream p load Ibslyr 18530 000 000 1501 2367 000 828 50727 000 000 000 000 935 000
upstream outflow ac-fllyr 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711 2209 63 000 000 000 000 1114 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
oulIlow P load Ibslyr 202 08 1003 498 2387 2519 628 972 517 17 055 810 231 039 932 469
oulftow volume ao-fIIyr 328 69 822 587 2374 2550 711 1195 222435 101 691 285 056 1114 660
outflow P cone ppb 227 59 44925 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26 6584 19933 324 79 320 78 252 02 307 96 26148
P removal etriclency '" 001 017 062 017 016 009 010 000 034 007 130 400 025 039
vlawrno pond volume acra-II 286 076 053 091 016 066 045 138 009 084 025 005 000 061
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season flIIClPllallOll llChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
Nnoff IoIaI P ppb 200 00 450 00 32500 32500 325 00 32500 262 50 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 26250 200 00 262 50
Nnoff ortho pJloIal p 061 040 051 051 051 051 056 056 081 051 051 056 081 056
Unit Nnoff n/yr 243 448 348 348 348 348 294 294 243 348 346 294 243 294
unllexpclft lbsIac-y 011 048 025 025 025 025 017 017 011 025 025 017 011 017
POND WATER BUDGETS
NnolJ ac-fl/yr 3090 822 567 985 176 711 483 1472 101 691 285 056 000 660
upstream pond ac-fl/yr 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711 220983 000 000 000 000 1114 000
totallllllow ac-fl/yr 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195 2224 35 101 891 285 056 11 14 660
outflow ac-fl/yr 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnoff lbsJyr 1680 1005 501 870 155 628 345 1050 055 611 234 040 000 471
upstream pond Ibslyr 185 30 000 000 1501 2367 000 628 507 27 000 000 000 000 935 000
tolal ntlow Ibslyr 202 10 1005 501 2372 2523 828 973 51717 055 611 234 040 935 471
netsedmenla/IOII lbsJyr 001 002 003 004 004 001 001 000 000 000 003 002 002 002
outftow lbslyr 202 08 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972 517 17 055 610 231 039 932 469
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 000 100 100 100 000 000 100 001 000 100 100 100 100
relalJvevolume nches 000 000 000 000 002 000 001 000 003 000 001 005 13333 000
residence Ime years 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
residence Ime days 000 004 008 002 001 005 003 000 036 005 014 065 003 008
overflow rale fl/yr 326691 70 1284 5673 60 2374020 25497 00 974 2913 2224348 08 1013 691 284960 564 08 11138 38 6597 23
ntlow phos cone ppb 227 60 450 02 32502 387 53 384 02 325 02 299 56 8584 200 01 325 02 325 02 26251 308 74 26251
oulftow phos eone ppb 227 59 44925 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26 8584 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 307 96 261 48
P reaCllon rale 000 000 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 004 000 000
1-rp 100 100 099 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 099 096 100 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnoff total P calc ppb 200 00 450 00 32500 32500 325 00 32500 262 50 262 50 20000 32500 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50
NnolJ coefflCtlll1t 009 017 013 013 013 013 011 011 009 013 013 011 009 011
dlSsolvedllotal P 081 040 051 051 051 051 056 056 061 051 051 056 061 056
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~No~elf~lCkLa'" IIIItlVerslll - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W walker July 1987, adapted by R to
Brasch, November 1998 check McKuslck McKuslCk Lake OlStrIcl
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 Lake Lily Lake (lake Vol From SHE DlFS Iludy)
case libel SO.305 SO-306 ML.1 ML-80 ML-2 ML.3 ML-4 ML.5 ML-6 ML.7 ML-8 ML.20 ML-21 ML-22
watershed area acres 108 1 124 498 580 16 2 106 63 68 10 461 96 52 29
baSil _ aeres 35 0001 29 52 0001 0001 0001 16 008 001 15 164 001 01
baSil voklrne acre-f1 7 0001 87 744 0001 0001 0001 32 008 0001 45 32 0001 01
'" lI\Inculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" IIldustnal 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" mull femlly res 18 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" .lngle '&lnlly res 47 83 100 45 0 50 100 100 50 100 100 50 0 50
'" open- 35 37 0 21 100 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 100 50
upstream P load IbI1yr 1401 748 17 000 000 000 017 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057
upstream outflow ac-ftlyr 1774 260535 000 000 000 032 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outlIow P load Ibs/yr 2832 785 55 908 3294 017 066 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 6431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189
outflow P cone ppb 191 85 109 32 17952 8859 19091 268 28 4617 20046 235 05 44342 188 83 17641 19760 189 95
P removal effICIency '" 4342 000 60 11 7641 455 306 000 5545 2768 147 5793 4572 1 20 2521
vlewmo pond voklrne ac:re-fI 339 356 172 2757 003 005 037 022 018 035 159 026 010 008
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
.ell8Oll length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precIpIIatJon IIche. 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
IUnolf total P ppb 362 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00
IUnoIf 0IlIl0 p/Iolal P 047 048 040 044 061 051 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051
unttnmolf IIIyr 406 372 446 616 243 346 446 446 346 448 448 346 243 346
Untt export lIls/ac-y 033 030 046 052 011 025 046 046 025 046 046 025 011 025
POND WATER BUDGETS
nmoff ac-ftIyr 3658 3647 1860 297 80 032 058 403 235 196 374 1722 276 105 084
upstntam pond ac-ftIyr 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105
totalllllow ac-ftIyr 5431 264382 1860 29780 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 , 05 189
outflow ac:-lIIyr 64 31 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
IUnolf Ibllyr 3604 3736 2275 303 95 018 051 493 288 173 457 2106 244 057 074
upstntem pond IbIIyr 1401 746 17 000 000 000 017 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057
totalllllow Ibs/yr 5005 78555 2275 303 95 018 068 3788 288 173 457 2556 244 057 130
net sedmentabOn Ibllyr 2173 000 1368 232 25 001 002 000 160 048 007 1461 1 12 001 033
oulfIow IbIIyr 2832 785 55 908 7171 017 066 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 200 100 300 1431 100 100 100 200 100 010 300 195 010 100
relative volume lIenes 517 000 1263 6745 008 005 001 3672 110 001 706 3125 003 323
rasldence tine years 013 000 047 250 000 000 000 136 004 000 021 1 16 000 005
residence tIlIe days 4704 000 170 72 91188 113 041 000 496 38 1491 010 7839 422 45 035 1933
ovelflow rate lIIyr 1552 264382007 641 573 32400 900 00 301834 80 147 2448 373 50 1397 169 105 30 '888
IIl10w plio. cone ppb 339 06 10932 450 02 375 52 200 01 27674 4617 45002 325 02 450 02 448 85 32502 200 01 253 96
outflow phos cone ppb 19185 109 32 179 52 8859 190 91 268 28 4617 200 46 23505 443 42 18883 17641 197 60 18995
P reacbon rele 136 000 378 1373 005 003 000 279 053 002 327 155 001 045
1-rp 057 100 040 024 095 097 100 045 072 099 042 054 099 075
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runolf 10181 P calC ppb 362 50 357 50 45000 375 50 200 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00
IUnolf coel'IIclent 015 014 017 023 009 013 017 017 013 017 017 013 009 013
dlSsoIvedllotal P 047 048 040 044 061 051 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051
PONDSIZE Model for McKusICk Lake
W Walker Julr 1987, 8dapted by R
Brasch, November 1998 Landlocked
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Landlocked
C8S8 label ML-23 ML-24 ML-25 SUBc..26 ML-27 ML-40 ML-41 ML-42 ML-43 ML-44 ML-31 ML-30 SUBC-45 SUBC-46
watershed area 8CIllS 83 37 16 8 132 22 44 09 4 28 227 12 715 98
bam area acres 037 001 048 001 132 036 01 02 015 028 0001 028 0001 0001
bam volume acre-ft 037 0001 048 0001 68 036 01 02 015 028 0001 05 0001 0001
'No agriculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'No llldustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'No mull family ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
'No mgle family res 100 75 50 50 66 25 50 50 60 50 10 15 100 84
'No open area 0 25 50 50 34 75 50 50 40 50 90 85 0 0
upstream p load IbsIyr 087 000 125 000 5199 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000
upstream outflow ac-ttJyr 189 000 122 000 328 15 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load IlsIyr 336 125 107 201 4047 027 101 083 158 047 304 117 3259 4781
outflow voklme ac-lIJyr 536 122 168 230 33231 054 181 207 329 081 488 274 2671 3815
outflow P conc ppb 230 47 37693 233 95 320 85 4480 18573 206 66 165 33 177 98 21490 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30
P removal eflk:1eIlCY 'No 3570 273 3550 128 2789 2925 2709 2538 2391 3388 042 3375 023 016
vlawmo pond voklme acre-Il 032 011 004 021 039 005 012 002 011 007 048 025 247 363
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpdatJon Illches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runolJ total p ppb 450 00 387 50 325 00 325 00 365 00 262 50 325 00 325 00 35000 325 00 22500 237 50 450 00 450 00
Nnotr 0Ith0 pIloIa/ P 040 045 051 051 047 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040
unll Nnolf nIyr 448 397 346 348 378 294 348 348 386 346 264 274 448 475
unllexport lbsIac-y 048 035 025 025 031 017 025 025 029 025 013 015 046 048
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoIf ac-ttJyr 347 122 046 230 416 054 127 026 122 081 498 274 2671 3915
upstream pond ac-lIJyr 189 000 122 000 32815 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000
totaIlIIlIow ac-tlIyr 536 122 168 230 332 31 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 26 71 3915
oulflow ac-lllyr 536 122 168 230 33231 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915
PONOPHOSPHORUSBUOGETS
Nnolf IlsIyr 425 129 041 204 413 038 112 023 116 071 305 177 3268 4789
upatream pond IbsIyr 097 000 125 000 5199 000 027 101 083 000 000 000 000 000
lolalllllow IbsIyr 522 129 168 204 5612 038 139 124 209 071 305 177 3266 4789
net ledmenlallon IbsIyr 186 004 058 003 1565 011 038 032 050 024 001 060 008 008
oulflow Ibslyr 336 125 107 201 4047 027 101 093 159 047 304 1 17 3258 4781
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean dep1h feet 100 010 100 010 500 100 100 100 100 100 100 179 100 100
relative volume IIches 288 002 2813 001 428 08 1802 213 2083 332 938 001 493 000 000
residence line years 007 000 028 000 020 067 006 010 005 035 000 018 000 000
residence line days 2519 030 104 00 016 7249 243 54 2020 3533 1666 12674 007 8686 001 001
overflow rele ftlyr 1449 12238 351 230 40 2518 150 1807 1033 2191 288 4984 92 978 26705 25 39150 54
III10w phos cone ppb 358 44 387 52 362 73 32502 6213 262 51 283 42 221 51 233 91 325 02 225 01 23751 450 02 450 02
outflow phos cone ppb 230 47 376 93 23395 32085 4480 18573 206 86 16533 177 98 214 80 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30
P re8cl1Ol1 rate 086 003 085 001 054 058 051 048 041 078 000 077 000 000
l-rp 064 097 064 099 072 071 073 075 076 066 100 086 100 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
Nnotr total P calc ppb 45000 387 50 32500 32500 365 00 262 50 325 00 32500 350 00 32500 22500 237 50 450 00 450 00
Nnolf coeffICIent 017 015 013 013 014 011 013 013 014 013 010 010 017 018
dlSsoIvedllolal P 040 045 051 051 047 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"IV In~ _ _ Ana~Kus~lVers~ct(1~S In_
McKuslCk McKuslCk McKuslCk Seenano Loadngs to McKuslCk L ,wI dIVersIOn,
Wetland Wetland Lake N_ optIOn (NWL=853) wI addl Ponds but no wetland treat
above 852 below 852 ML-47 Date 1-11-99 (Inwdes field checked pond data)
Summary Slats
~ND~elf~IckLa_
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES
case libel
watershed area
baan area
bun Yo~me
'" agncullurelland
'" nduslnlll
'" mull family res
'" silgle family res
'" open area
upstream p load
upstream outflow
OUTPUT VARIABLES
ouUIow P load
ouUIow volume
ouUIow p cone
p removal aIIIclenc:y
vlawmo pond volume
UNITS
acres
acres
acre-ft
IbsIyr
ac-II/yr
IbsIyr
ac-II/yr
ppb
'"
acre-ll
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length YfS
season preClpdatlOn lIlChes
Nnotr total P ppb
Nnotf ortho pJtotal P
un. Nnotr n/yr
un. export lbsIac-y
POND WATER BUDGETS
NnoIJ
upstream pond
total nllow
outIbw
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
Nnotf Ib~
upstream pond IbIIyr
total nftow IbIIyr
nal seclmentatlOn Ib~
outIbw Ib~
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet
relative volume IIlches
reslllenca trne years
residence trne days
ovtllflow rete II/yr
nIIow phoa cone ppb
ouUIow p/los cone ppb
P reac:tJon rete
1-rp
LAND USE PARAMETERS
NnoIf total P calc: ppb
Nnotf c:oeIIiCIent
dlSsotvedltotal P
ac-fllyr
ac-II/yr
ac-ltIyr
ac-ltIyr
SUBC-83
63
0001
0001
o
o
10
60
30
000
000
2153
2116
37422
021
198
100
2700
375 00
046
403
034
2116
000
2116
2116
0001
24
10
o
o
o
o
100
000
000
000
000
17359
1321
000
100
2700
200 00
061
243
011
2157 000
000 000
2157 000
005 000
2153 000
100 042
000 1333333 33
000 49382 72
002 18024691 36
21163 28 000
37502 200 01
37422 173 59
000 0 18
1 00 087
375 00
015
046
200 00
009
081
-
0001 0001
173 46
7 205
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 80
100 20
000 930 00
000 3067 24
000 661 40
000 3067 25
16382 7934
1225 2888
000 000
M L watershed (sxlStng condlllOns, pre-dlVenllon)
Dnct 234
indirect 673
Total 907 wsIIake area retlO
Water area 67
GRAND TOTAL 974
M L watershed (post-dlVerslon)
Direct
Indnct
Total
Water area
GRAND TOTAL
234
3,583
3,817
394
4,211
wsIIake area ratIO
100
2700
200 00
061
243
011
P-COEFF RUNOFF COEFF
450 0 12
350 0488
450 0 227
450 0 188
200 0 09
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
100
2700
400 00
044
407
037
Notas Ca~bratlOn Nn for WILMS under 1996 condlbons,
Actual wq for LIly Lake outflow. pl8Clp IS for 1996 water year
000
3067 24 Assumes McK Lake NWL IS about 853 and that dIVerted water
3067 25 not pall through upper wetland
306725 Also assumes pond III S1J1lwater(SD-305), 5 ponds II Grant rnshp (S0-201-205)
Agricultural
IndustriaVcommercl81
Muftlfamlly
% slIllIle family res
% open area
o 00 0 00 Kay for pond IRfonnatlOR numencalscnpts
000 930 00 1 - Both wet volume ancl area from HydroCad nput
000 930 00 2. Pond area only from HydroCad nput (generaUy shows no wet volume)
000 268 60 3 - Wet voklme only from HydroCad nput
000 661 40 4. Pond area from 200 scale topo maps
5 - Wat volume from field check
6 - Wat yolume from as-buUls
040 4 46 7. Pond area, wet volume from OPH SWMP
93333333 1631299735 8 - Volume, depth assumed
17283 95 0 07 9 - Vo~me from E Paters (esbmatad)
630864198 2439 field checked poncls checked n January, 1999
000 6668
188 80 11155
163 92 79 34
o 16 0 57
088 0 71
200 00
009
061
400 00
015
044
- -
20
78
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI lake Model Spreadsheet
WISCONSIN LAKE MODEL SPREADSHEET
VERSION 201 - AUGUST 1996
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Although this model has been tested by WDNR. no warranty IS
expressed or Implied See users manual pnor model use
*
*
*
*
*
************* ,u......................AA...... ",",AlA""''''''''",''"' "......"......1.......4&...... 4.1......&&.........."....11 .......""........,1..1.... .u.............U,AA.....A ***' **
LAKE 10 McKuslck lake. Stlllwater(AUAR preferred w/o ponds}
To auto load wtrshd data. enter county 10, hold CTRL and type L
WATERSHED COUNTY IDENT. NUMBER = 56 CO NAME St CroIX
*
*
*
'************* .u........U,*A........ ,U,A.U,AA..........AAA A..............lA...AA,U. """..."...........u....... ************* ****.u,............".IIA *** **
HYDROLOGIC AND MORPHOMETRIC MODULE
*
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*
ENGLISH METRIC
TRIB DRAINAGE AREA = 4211 0 Ac 1 70E+07 m^2
TOTAL UNIT RUNOFF = 8 7 In 0222 m
ANNUAL RUNOFF VOLUME = 3067 0 Ac-Ft 3 78E+06 m^3
LAKE SURFACE AREA <As> = 46 0 Ac 1 86E+05 m^2
LAKE VOLUME <V> = 160 0 Ac-ft 1 97E+05 m^3
LAKE MEAN DEPTH <z> = 348 Ft 106m
PRECIP - EVAP = 62 In 016 m
HYDRAULIC LOADING = 3090 8 Ac-Ftf(r 3 81 E+06 m^3IYr
AREAL WATER LOAD <qs> = 672E+01 FtlYr 205E+01 mNr
LAKE FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1932 Nr Tw = 005 Yr
................1.\............ ..".&A-......""........ ************* ************* ************* ************* ************* *** ***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
Page 1
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
**........**** ..;;;;;;****** ************* ***'********** ***********.* ************* ************* *** ***
PHOSPHORUS LOADING MODULE
=================================================================
-LOADING (Kg/Ha-Yr)--
LAND USE AREA MOST LOADING
(AC) LOW LIKELY HIGH PERCENT
ROW CROP AG 00 050 150 300 00
MIXED AG 00 080 100 140 00
PASTURE/GRASS 00 010 030 050 00
HD URBAN 00 100 130 200 00
MD URBAN 00 040 050 080 00
RURAL RES 00 005 010 025 00
WETLANDS 00 010 010 010 00
FOREST 00 005 009 018 00
OTHER LAND USE 1 4211 0 016 026 036 989
OTHER LAND USE 2 00 000 000 000 00
LAKE SURFACE 460 010 027 100 1 1
*
*
*
*
-----------------------
.
POINT SOURCE WATER LOADING (m^3Nr) =
POINT SOURCE PH OS (KglYr) 0 00
SEP TANK OUTPUT(kg/cp-yr) 030
# capita-years = 0 00
% P RETAINED BY SOIL = 98
SEP TANK LOADING (KglYr) 000
o OOE+OO
000 000
050 080
*
00
.
.
.
90 80
000 000
.
00
.
-------
.
TOTAL LOADINGS (Lb) =
TOTAL LOADINGS (Kg) =
6 05E+02 9 88E+02 1 39E+03
2 75E+02 4 48E+02 6 32E+02
1000
1000
.
*
.
AREAL LOADING(LblAc-Yr) = 132E+01 215E+01 303E+01
AREAL LOADING(mglm^2-yr)= 147E+03 241E+03 340E+03
% TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION = 0
.
*
.
.
To view a graph of phosphorus Inputs expressed as percentages
of the total phosphorus load, select the LOAD GRAPH tab When you
are finslshed viewing the graph, select the WILMS200 tab
************* ************* ************* ****...****** ************* ************* .................4............... ... ***
*
.
.
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
.
*
*
.
*
*
*
.
*
.
.
*
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
PHOSPHORUS PREDICTION MODULE
*******.***** ************* ************. ..****.****** ************* ************* ************* *** ***
*
=================================================================
THE OBSERVED SPRING TOTAL PHOSPHORUS =
THE OBSERVED GROWING SEASON PHOSPHORUS :
o mglm^3
110 mg/m^3
Enter the spnng and/or the growing season P concentration
The lake models predict either an SPO or a GSM P concentration
A predicted phosphorus concentration will appear only for those
models where the observed value has been entered An "NA" IS
returned If a model IS not calculated
Spnng Overturn P cone = SPO, GroWIng Season Mean P cone = GSM
LAKE PHOSPHORUS MODELS
PREDICTED
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
(mglm^3)
1 WALKER,1987 RESERVOIR MODEL (GSM)
50 82 115
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN,1981,ARTIFICAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
4 RECKHOW, 1979, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (GSM)
41 67 94
5 RECKHOW, 1977, ANOXIC LAKE MODEL (GSM)
63 103 146
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 m/yr (GSM)
50 82 116
7 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs > 50 mJyr (GSM)
#N/A #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER 1977, GENERAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
#N/A #N1A #N1A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO and GSM)
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO)
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs < 10 m/yr #N/A
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs >= 10 mlyr 047
...a\,.,..............U..U.....AA...*******A1AAA.......U.AJ,*******...A......A&44......4AA4441o....U..U........
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
82
#N1A
#N/A
67
103
82
#N1A
#N/A
79
#N1A
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
*
-
Page 3
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*************************************************........*************
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS MODULE
=================================================================
PREDICTED
MINUS 70 PERCENT
OBSERVElPERCENT CONFIDENCE
LAKE RESPONSE MODEL (mg/m^3) DIFF INTERVAL
...-----------------------
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR 82 #DIVIO' 52 118
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A <=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A <=
4 RECKHOW, 1979 GENERAL -43 -39 41 99
5 RECKHOW,1977 ANOXIC -7 -6 67 146
6 RECKHOW, 1977 qs<50mlyr -28 -25 51 121
7 RECKHOW, 1977 qs>50mlyr #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 24 44
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER #N/A #N/A
<= Range withIn which 95% of the observations should fall
See users manual dIScussion on the use of these moc::lels
.************ **"....AAA...AAAA ************* .114.&"A........4A*** ........l.l...IAAA"'...... **********'*** ........****** *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
******.****** .****.******* ************* *********.*** ***.*.****.*. .*******'***** ************* *** ***
PARAMETER RANGE MODULE
Model Input values MUST be Within the ranges listed below
WILMS displays FIT If Inputs satisfy conditions. NO FIT If not
PARAMETERS
=================================================================
*
*
*
*
*
************* ***.********* ************* ....."......4.1.....114 ************* ************* AAA.IIAA"'AAA"'" *** ***
AREAL WATER LOADING <qs=zlTw> = 2 05E+01 m/yr
INFLOW PHOSPHORUS CONC <LTw/z> = 0118 mg/\
MEAN DEPTH <z> = 1 06 m
FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1932 /yr
HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME <Tw> = 0 05 yr
AREAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING <L> = 240713 mg/m^2-yr
P = PREDICTED IN LAKE PHOS CONCENTRATION mg/m^3
Model data base size
=================================================================
1 WALKER. 1985 RESERVOIR MODEL
1 5 < z < 58 m 0 13 < Tw < 1 91 yr
0014 < LTw/z < 1047 mg/\
<NO FIT>
P=
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN. 1981 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P < 2600 mg/m^3 30< L < 7600 mg/m^2-yr #N/A
02< z <307 m 0001< P <183/yr P=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN. 1981 ARTIFICIAL LAKE MODEL
6< P <1500 mglm^3 40< L <820,000 mg/m^2Iyr #N/A
06< z <59 m 0019< P <18001Yr P=
4 RECKHOW, 1979 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P <135 mgim^3 70< L <31.400 mg/m^2-yr
075< qs <187 m1yr
<FIT>
P=
5 RECKHOW.1977 ANOXIC LAKE MODEL
17< P < 610 mg/m^3 0 024< LTw/z< o 621mg/\
<FIT>
P=
6 RECKHOW. 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 m1yr
P < 60 mg/m^3 LTwlz < 298 mgn
<NO FIT>
P=
7 RECKHOW. 1977 LAKES WITH qs> 50 m1yr
P < 135 mg/m^3 LTwlz < 0178 mgn
Tw < 0 25 yr z < 13 m
#N/A
P=
8 WALKER. 1977 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
P < 900 mg/m^3 L Twlz < 1 0 mg/\
#N/A
P=
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
NOT AVAILABLE
<FIT>
P=
(41)
82
(290)
#N/A
(433)
#N/A
(47)
(21)
103
(33)
82
(28)
#N/A
(105)
#N/A
67
79
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10 DILLON. RIGLER. KIRCHNER. 1975 LAKE MODEL (15)
P < 15 mg/m^3 107 < L < 2210 mg/m^2-yr #N/A
1 5< qs < 223 m1yr 0 21 < P < 63/yr P= #N/A
************* ....u..u..a................ "'A"A.,U,AAAA"" ***********'** ....u......................."'.,. ........u"u..u.....u,. ,.......".",.........,...,. *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
*
*
Page 5
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake Watershed InformatIOn from HydroCad model prepared Outflow from AnalysIs McKuslCk Lake DIVersIOn Impact (1996 WILMS Input)
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R by Ene Peters (BRA) for Stillwater AUAR OPH east of Hwy 5 ScenarIO Loadings to McKuslCk L ,wi diverSIOn,
Brasch, November 1998 Oak Park Heights Sub District Market Place Subdlstnct (NWL lor lake IS 852, wetland treatment, no NURP pondlng lor SD-201 ~
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 4,8 lleld checked 1 4,8 48
case label OPH-13 OPH-14 OPH-12 OPH-150PH-11 MP-12 MP-121 Reach.13 MP-99 MP-l MP-2 MP-98 MP-5
watershed area acres 59 64 29 38 78 96 99 0001 234 798 212 187 154
basin area acres 345 097 11 07 38 03 08 0001 12 04 0001 044 015
basin volume acre-lt 87 29 2 28 131 064 16 0001 48 04 0001 088 03
% agrlCulluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mdustnal 0 0 0 100 86 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100
% mulll family res 0 0 0 0 11 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0
% single family res 100 100 100 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% open area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load lbslyr 000 000 000 847 5004 000 000 574 000 1020 000 000 1145
upstream oulllow ac-f1lyr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 998 000 2569 000 000 2053
OUTPUT VARIABlES
outflow P load IbsIyr 1258 1308 647 2437 6509 289 286 573 1020 8293 2209 11 45 2233
oulllow volume ac-ftIyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 186 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744
oulflow p cone ppb 21008 201 38 21988 17061 144 17 216 53 20784 211 50 146 02 269 26 349 21 205 09 21945
P removal efhclency % 5332 5525 5114 4721 4603 5189 5382 030 5828 1136 023 4141 1889
v1awmo pond volume acre-It 204 221 100 386 626 045 047 000 238 811 216 190 157
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 27,00 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00
runoff onho llItotal p 040 040 040 036 037 040 040 040 036 036 036 036 036
umt runoff mIyr 448 448 448 1318 1040 613 613 613 1318 1318 1318 1318 1318
unit expon lbsIac-y 046 046 046 104 090 062 062 062 104 104 104 104 104
POND WATER BUDGETS I
runon ac-ftIyr 2204 2390 1083 4172 6761 490 506 000 2569 8762 2328 2053 1891
upstream pond acftlyr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 200;31
tolallllllow ac-ftIyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 186 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 37441
outflow ac-ftlyr 2204 2390 1083 5258 186 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 2695 2924 1325 3969 7057 600 618 000 2444 8336 2215 1953 1609
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 000 000 647 5004 000 000 574 000 1020 000 000 1145
total Inllow Ibslyr 2695 2924 1325 4617 120 61 600 618 574 2444 9355 2215 1953 2753
nel sedlmentallon Ibalyr 1437 1615 878 2180 5552 311 333 002 1425 1063 005 809 520
outflow Ibslyr 1258 1308 647 2437 6509 289 286 573 1020 8293 2209 1145 2233
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth leel 194 299 182 400 345 213 200 100 400 100 100 200 200
relat'Ve volume IncheS 821 328 499 181 523 352 854 5286 504 012 000 1 16 048
residence lime years 030 012 018 005 008 013 032 000 019 000 000 004 001
r8sldencellme days 11097 4428 6740 1945 2879 4764 11550 004 6819 129 002 1564 292
overflow rate ftlyr 639 2464 985 7508 4371 1634 632 9960 14 2141 283 28 23277 60 4667 249 61
Inflow phos cone ppb 450 02 450 02 450 02 323 20 2Q14 450 02 450 02 21213 350 02 303 76 350 02 350 02 270 54
outflow phos conc ppb 21008 201 38 21988 170 61 144 17 21653 2m 84 21150 146 02 269 26 349 21 205 09 21945
P reactJon rate 245 276 214 169 158 224 252 000 335 014 000 121 029
1-rp 047 045 049 053 054 048 046 100 042 089 100 059 081
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00
runoff coeffICient 017 017 017 049 039 023 023 023 049 049 049 049 049
d1ssofved1total P 040 040 040 036 037 040 040 040 036 036 036 036 036
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'S'_tor McKuslck Lake-w!81VeS t!!m - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lake Elmo Subdlstnct
W Walker July 1987, adaphld by R OPH east 01 Hwy 5 depth as ree by EP depths lor LE.7 & 4 rec by EP
Brasch, November 1998 field checked field checked field cheeked field checked check cheek check
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 4,8 2 2 4,8 4,8 Pond 10 2,9 2 2 2 2,9 2,9 2
caw label UP-7 Mp.ll Mp-8 UP-9 MP-14 (Rch-10) LE-1 LE-3 LE-5 LE-6 LE-7 LE-4 LE 8
watorshed area acres 758 n2 349 1474 129 258 366 45 99 329 91 1059 325
baSIll area acres 33 027 035 3 06 23 34 03 048 0001 35 175 0001
basm volume acre.ft 132 0001 0001 75 06 69 68 0001 0001 0001 35 35 0001
'" agllculturalland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" Induslnal 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 89 0 34
% multi family res 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" smgle family res 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0
% open area 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 11 26 64
upstream p load Ibslyr 19817 000 3521 5696 000 25041 000 000 000 000 361 6351 5830
upstream oulllow ac-ftIyr 350 10 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load IbsIyr 17976 3521 5698 6184 881 225 89 264 049 109 361 5929 5830 6927
outflow volume ac-flIyr 433 33 2883 4666 101 71 1416 5n53 741 091 200 666 9762 142 79 15913
outfIowpconc ppb 162 63 449 33 44914 223 70 228 85 143 91 131 11 199 75 199 85 199 47 223 46 150 23 160 15
P removal effICIency % 3519 015 010 5025 3462 1856 3445 013 008 027 31 11 4168 001
vlawmo pond volume acre-fl 771 267 165 510 131 262 069 008 019 062 642 323 1 51
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpttatlOn IIIChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff lo1aI p ppb 350 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 247 00
runoff ortho pIlotal p 036 040 040 040 036 036 061 061 061 081 039 045 051
URlt runoff mJyr 1318 448 613 448 1318 1318 243 243 243 243 1199 395 604
umlexport lb8Iac-y 104 046 062 046 104 104 011 011 011 011 091 034 034
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-flIyr 8323 2863 1783 5505 1416 2833 741 091 200 666 9095 34 85 1634
upstream pond ac-ftIyr 350 10 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279
total mflow ac-ftIyr 433 33 2883 4666 101 71 1416 5n53 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 159 13
outflow ac-fllyr 433 33 2883 4666 10171 1416 5n53 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 159 13
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff lbafyr 7918 3527 2180 6734 1348 2695 403 050 109 362 8245 3647 1097
upstream pond Ib8Iyr 198 17 000 3521 5696 000 25041 000 000 000 000 361 63 51 5830
total mflow Ibslyr 2n35 3527 5702 12430 1348 2n36 403 050 109 362 8608 9998 6928
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 9759 005 006 6246 466 5147 139 000 000 001 26n 4167 001
outflow IbsIyr 17978 3521 5698 6184 881 225 89 264 049 109 361 5929 5830 6927
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 400 000 000 250 100 300 200 000 000 100 100 200 100
relatIVe volume Inches 428 000 000 368 114 658 24n 003 001 000 104 2712 000
residence lime years 003 000 000 007 004 001 092 000 000 000 004 025 000
residence lime days 1112. 001 001 2691 1546 436 334 88 040 018 005 1309 8947 000
overflow rat. flIyr 131 31 106 79 13331 3390 2361 251 10 218 304 418 6662 25 2789 816 159134 03
lI'IlIow phos cone ppb 235 48 450 02 449 59 449 62 350 02 17670 200 01 200 01 20001 200 01 324 37 25761 160 17
outflow phos cone ppb 152 63 449 33 449 14 223 70 228 85 143 91 131 11 199 75 199 85 199 47 223 46 150 23 160 15
P reacbon rate 084 000 000 203 081 028 080 000 000 000 066 123 000
l-Ip 065 100 100 050 065 081 066 100 100 100 069 058 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 350 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 247 00
runoff coeffICient 049 017 023 017 049 049 009 009 009 009 044 015 022
d1sso1vedltolal P 036 040 040 040 036 036 061 061 061 061 039 045 051
PONDSIZE Model lor McKuslck Lake
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch. November 1998 Legends and Liberty Dev (west of Long Lake)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 1 1 1 1 Landlocked 2 2 1 1 1
case label LLD-32 LLD-33 LLD-34 LLD-35 LLD-36 LLD-371 LLD-37 LLD-38 LLD-39 LLD-40 LLD-41 LLD-42 LLD 43
watershed area acres 9 29 374 44 9 76 76 55 1 5 26 126 141 239
baSIn area acres 065 065 1 075 08 0001 01 028 04 086 07 09 0001
basin volume acre-It 0001 28 82 075 3 0001 0001 0001 02 14 32 04 0001
"" agnculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"" Industnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"" mull. family res 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"" smgle fanuly res 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 100 100
"" open area 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0
upstream p load IbsIyr 000 581 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674
upstream outflow ac-lIIyr 000 460 1543 000 000 000 182 466 838 000 053 523 1050
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load IbsIyr 581 755 994 113 054 340 400 849 652 020 209 674 1762
outflow volume ac IIIyr 460 1543 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943
outflow P cone ppb 44917 180 10 124 40 253 56 109 72 440 59 31542 355 62 278 89 136 79 14718 236 27 333 69
P removal effICiency "" 019 5996 5966 4366 4514 210 049 027 1630 3161 64 83 2100 024
vlawmo pond volume acre-It 043 100 129 015 017 026 026 019 003 005 044 049 083
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff tolal p ppb 460 00 460 00 460 00 450 00 200 00 460 00 460 00 460 00 200 00 200 00 460 00 450 00 460 00
runoll ortho ~al p 040 040 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040
unttrunoll IlIIyr 613 448 448 448 243 448 448 448 243 243 448 448 448
Unll export Ibslac-y 082 046 046 046 011 046 048 046 011 011 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS I
I
runoff ac-lIIyr 460 1083 1397 164 182 284 284 205 030 053 471 527 893
upstream pond ac-lIIyr 000 460 1543 000 000 000 182 466 838 000 053 523 1050
total Inflow ac-lIIyr 460 1543 2940 184 182 284 466 872 866 053 523 1050 194~
outflow ac-lllyr 460 1543 2940 164 182 284 466 872 866 053 523 1050 194~
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff IbsIyr 582 1325 1709 201 099 347 347 251 017 029 576 644 1092
upstream pond Ib~r 000 581 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674
1o1al Inflow IbsIyr 562 1886 2464 201 099 347 402 651 779 029 595 853 1766
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 001 1131 1470 088 045 007 002 002 127 009 386 179 004
outflow lbsIyr 561 755 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 674 1762
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 000 400 620 100 375 100 001 000 050 163 457 044 100
relatIVe volume InChes 001 848 1198 1232 4444 001 001 001 1778 7179 1836 205 000
residence time years 000 017 021 046 165 000 000 000 002 268 081 004 000
residence tlme days 008 6151 7898 166 58 600 82 013 008 005 843 970 56 223 22 1391 002
overflow rate ltfyr 707 2374 2940 219 228 2838 60 4661 2583 2166 061 748 1167 19425 60
mflow phos conc ppb 460 02 449n 306 36 450 02 200 01 450 02 318 96 356 60 33080 200 01 41851 299 09 334 50
outflow phos conc ppb 449 17 180 10 124 40 253 56 109 72 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 136 79 14718 236 27 333 69
P reaclJon rate 000 374 367 138 150 002 000 000 023 068 524 034 000
l-rp 100 040 040 056 055 098 100 100 084 068 035 079 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoll total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff coelllClenl 023 017 017 017 009 017 017 017 009 009 017 017 017
dtssolvedl101al P 040 040 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~
PONDSIZE Model lor McKuslCk Lake Outflow from LlD
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R west of LL (Link 3 on LL HeDI
Brasch, November 1998 Long Lake-Sl03, 5105, S106 and hnked watersheds
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 1 1 Long L LongL Long L Dummy 2 1 1 1
case label LLD-60 LLD-44 LLD-45 LLD-31 D'r&et30 Dlrect47 DIl'ect46 LongL LL-l LL-2 LL-3 Ll 4 LL-5
wat~rshed area acres 73 458 157 14 207 81 138 0001 152 77 234 7 96
basm area acres 0001 19 033 015 0001 0001 0001 0001 2 0001 0001 0001 0001
basin volume acre It 0001 10 087 056 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
% agflCulturalland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ mdullrtaJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% rnuhllarnlly res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% single lamlly res 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100
% open area 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0
lIp8tream p load IbsIyr 000 000 248 50 000 000 000 000 ffl38 000 000 1038 000 2412
upstream outflow ac-ftIyr 000 000 114303 000 000 000 000 120219 000 000 855 000 1991
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load IbsIyr 326 248 50 253 51 000 2Z7 363 151 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 273 114303 114889 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349
outflow P conc ppb 440 23 7999 8118 195 50 19915 441 15 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 445 31
P removal efIlCl8ncy % 218 4086 084 5656 043 197 064 000 007 207 036 226 026
vlawmo pond volume acre-It 025 722 054 048 039 028 026 000 053 027 081 024 033
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yra 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season prllClpl1atlOn mches Z700 Z700 Z700 2700 Z700 Z700 Z700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 450 00 399 50 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff ortho IIitotaI p 040 035 040 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040
un.runoll IrVyr 448 673 448 448 243 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 448
un. export lbsIae-y 046 061 046 046 011 046 011 011 046 046 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-fI/yr 273 7797 586 523 419 303 279 000 568 288 874 261 359
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 000 1065 06 114303 000 000 000 000 1202 19 000 000 855 000 1991
totallnllow ac-ftlyr 273 114303 114889 523 419 303 279 120219 588 288 1729 261 2349
outflow ac-ftIyr 273 1143 03 1148 89 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoll Ibsfyr 334 8467 717 640 228 370 152 000 694 352 1069 320 439
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 335 52 248 50 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412
totaIl'lflow bsIyr 334 420 19 255 67 640 228 370 152 277 38 694 352 2107 320 2851
net sedimentatIOn Ibslyr 007 171 69 215 640 001 007 001 000 000 007 008 007 008
outflow Ibslyr 326 248 50 253 51 2Z7 363 1 51 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth leat 100 392 264 373 100 100 100 100 000 100 100 100 100
relative volume Inches 001 5264 401 289 001 001 001 133 33 000 001 000 001 001
residence lime years 000 013 000 011 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
residence time days 013 4854 028 3909 009 012 013 000 006 013 002 014 002
oveJ1low rate fI/yr Z726 55 2946 3481 49 3486 4191 75 3025 35 2794 50 1202191 81 284 2875 95 17293 05 261450 2349315
mUow phas cone ppb 450 02 135 25 8187 450 02 200 01 450 02 200 01 8489 450 02 450 02 448 37 450 02 446 49
outflow phas cone ppb 440 23 7999 8118 19550 199 15 441 15 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 44531
P reactIOn rate 002 117 001 300 000 002 001 000 000 002 000 002 000
1-11' 098 059 099 043 100 098 099 100 100 098 100 098 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 399 50 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoll coefflCl8n1 017 025 017 017 009 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 017
d1ssolVedItotal P 040 040 040 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040
PONDSIZE Model for MeKuslCk Lake ReceIVes outflow ReceIVes outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R from MP from OPH, LE
Brasch, November 1998 depth as ree by EP (Link 1 on LL HCD) (Link 2 on LL HCD)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2,9 1 2 1 1 2 1 no entry (HCe 1 2
case label LL-6 LL-7 LL-8 Resch-9 LL-15 LL-14 LL-13 LL-12 LL-ll LL-30 LL-2O LL-21 LL-22
watershed area acres 182 273 45 39 284 355 478 86 378 109 5 374 298 266
basm area acres 0001 24 0001 0001 5 142 0001 089 158 1 0001 0001 242
basm volume acre-fl 0001 48 0001 0001 0001 246 0001 0001 16 05 0001 0001 0001
% agneufturalland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0
% Industnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
% mufti family res 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0
% smgle faRIIIy res 100 100 100 100 25 100 100 0 53 0 15 0 0
% open anta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 47 100 0 27 0
upstream p load Ibslyr 000 3667 000 199 225 89 000 000 000 000 000 000 7999 000
upstream outflow ac-fllyr 000 3029 000 168 57753 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load lbalyr 824 2430 199 370 242 44 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9323 2777
outflow volume ac-fllyr 680 4049 168 314 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921
outfIowpconc ppb 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53 150 91 209 99 448 45 199 92 308 16 17793 44296 176 76 349 88
P ramoval enlClency % 090 5055 341 187 000 5334 035 005 733 1104 157 001 004
v1awmo pond volume acre-It 063 094 016 013 125 123 165 016 103 205 099 118 270
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runon total p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 450 00 382 50 350 00
runoff Ol1ho pItoIaI p 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 046 036
unit runoff Inlyr 448 448 448 448 572 448 448 243 352 243 343 513 1318
unl export lbsIae-y 046 046 046 046 058 046 046 011 026 011 035 044 104
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ae-fllyr 680 1020 168 146 1353 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 1274 2921
upstream pond ac-ftIyr 000 3029 000 168 57753 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000
totaIllIflow ac-ftIyr 680 4049 168 314 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921
outflow ac-ftlyr 680 4049 168 314 591 06 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 831 1247 206 178 1655 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 1325 2779,
upstream pond IbsIyr 000 3667 000 199 225 89 000 000 000 000 000 000 7999 000 I
total Inflow Ibslyr 831 4915 206 377 242 44 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 9324 2779 I
net udlmentatlOn IbsIyr 008 2484 007 007 001 865 008 000 073 133 021 001 001 I
outflow lbsIyr 824 2430 199 370 242 44 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9323 2777 r
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 100 200 100 100 000 173 100 000 010 050 100 100 000
relatIVe volume II1CheS 000 1271 002 002 000 5009 000 002 390 061 000 000 000
resilience time years 000 012 000 000 000 186 000 000 014 002 000 000 000
resilience time days 005 4327 022 012 000 6Tl19 002 021 5271 823 003 000 001
ovel1low rate ftlyr 6797 70 1687 168075 313740 11821 093 17853 30 196 070 2217 10678 64 19404795 1207
Inflow phos cone ppb 450 02 448 61 450 02 441 81 150 91 450 02 450 02 200 01 332 52 20001 450 02 176 78 350 02
outflow phos cone ppb 445 95 220 85 43468 433 53 150 91 209 99 448 45 19992 308 16 17793 442 96 176 76 34988
P reactIOn rate 001 207 004 002 000 246 000 000 009 014 002 000 000
l-rp 099 049 097 098 100 047 100 100 093 089 098 100 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 450 00 382 50 350 00
runoff coeffICient 017 017 017 017 021 017 017 009 013 009 013 019 049
dIssolvedllolal P 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 061 050 061 016 046 036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~DSI"llor~Lak~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ReceIVes outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R Portion 01 Legends and Liberty dramage Stillwater District from LLO below Long Lake I
B~h.NovemberI998 linked to dlv below Long Lake Future pond (link 2 on SO HCO)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 Reach wet volume 2 1,
ease label LL-23 OIr 10 Olr 16 Long Lake WMA Pond LLD-l01 LLD-50 LLO-l02 LLD-52 50-201 50202 Reach 104 50-105
watershed area acres 285 252 595 0001 398 50 152 240 265 50 48 0001 41 ~
baSin area acres 046 0001 0001 933 169 0001 0001 0001 087 1 1 0001 06
basin volume acre-fl 0001 0001 0001 380 338 0001 0001 0001 4 0001 0001 0001 055
% agncuhuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0
% Industnal 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0
% mulll family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
% sllgle family res 0 20 50 0 20 0 100 100 36 0 0 0 0
% open area 70 80 50 100 80 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
upstream p load IbsIyr 121 00 000 000 747 17 504 ffl 000 549 000 12197 000 000 11169 326
upstream outflow ac-fl/yr 223 25 000 000 216277 216277 000 1013 000 105 44 000 000 154 09 273
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 129 94 404 1511 504 67 468 49 549 1241 109 57 7947 1644 1578 11167 2028
outflow volume ac-fl/yr 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19 1013 1580 8964 127 63 1350 1296 154 09 2402
outflow p cone ppb 20196 249 00 324 34 8585 7935 199 65 288 86 449 71 229 09 448 06 448 04 266 65 31058
P removal effICiency % 001 041 021 3246 833 018 025 007 4529 044 044 002 3082
vlawmo pond volume acre.fl 124 055 159 000 087 094 053 830 205 125 120 000 197
ASSUMEOEXPORTFACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn lnehes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 245 00 250 00 325 00 200 00 250 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00
runoff ortho p/lolal P 054 057 051 061 057 061 040 040 037 010 010 061 040
undrunoff InIyr 565 284 346 243 284 243 448 448 1005 324 324 243 613
unll export Ibs/ac-y 031 016 025 011 016 011 046 046 088 033 033 011 062
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-fl/yr 1343 596 1714 000 942 1013 568 8964 2219 1350 1296 000 2130
upstream pond ac-1tIyr 223 25 000 000 216277 216277 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 154 09 273
total mfIow ac-ftlyr 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19 1013 1580 8964 127 63 1350 1296 154 09 2402
outflow ac-fl/yr 236 68 596 1714 216277 217219 1013 1580 8964 127 63 1350 1296 154 09 2402
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 894 405 1514 000 640 550 694 10964 2328 1651 1585 000 2605
upstream pond Ibslyr 121 00 000 000 747 17 504 67 000 549 000 12197 000 000 111 69 326
total mflow IbsIyr 129 95 405 1514 747 17 511 07 550 1244 109 64 14525 1651 1585 111 69 2931
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 001 002 003 242 50 4258 001 003 008 6578 007 007 002 903
outrlow Ibslyr 129 94 404 1511 504 67 468 49 549 1241 10957 7947 1644 1578 11167 2028
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 000 100 100 407 200 100 100 100 460 000 000 100 081
relallve volume IllChes 000 000 o 00 50666666 67 9687 000 000 000 487 000 000 133 33 070
residence time years 000 000 000 018 002 000 000 000 003 000 000 000 002
residence time days 000 006 002 6413 568 004 002 000 1144 003 003 000 836
ovelflow rate 1tIyr 514 53 5964 84 1713600 2318 128 53 1012500 15802 20 89640 00 146 70 1350 1296 154087 67 3533
Ilflow phos cone ppb 202 00 250 01 325 02 12710 8656 200 01 289 60 450 02 41872 450 02 450 02 266 69 44891
outfll7N phos cone ppb 201 98 249 00 324 34 8585 7935 199 65 288 86 449 71 229 09 448 06 448 04 266 65 31058
P reacllon rale 000 000 000 071 010 000 000 000 151 000 000 000 064
1-rp 100 100 100 068 092 100 100 100 055 100 100 100 069
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff lo1al P calc ppb 245 00 250 00 325 00 200 00 250 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00
runoffCQelflCl8nt 021 011 013 009 011 009 017 017 037 012 012 009 023
dIssolvedltotal P 054 057 051 061 057 061 040 040 037 OlD 010 061 040
PONOSIZE Model for McKuSlCk Lake
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R
Brasch. November 1998 check check check check check
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2
case label SO-206 SO-203 SO 204 SO-205 SO-201 SO-202 SO-207 SO-l SO-2 S03 S04 SO-8 SO-9
watershed area acras 224 205 55 39 50 48 1526 22 197 342 61 247 197
Will araa ecres 0001 5 15 13 1 1 0001 065 0001 0001 0001 073 041
basin voluma acre-II 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
% agrICultural land 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IIlduslnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mull. family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% SlIlgle family res 50 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 50 50 50 50 25
% open ilrea 50 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 50 50 50 75
upstream p load IbsIyr 2028 000 000 1811 000 000 273 39 000 000 1501 23&7 000 628
upstream outflow ac-ftlyr 2402 000 000 1485 000 000 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711
OUTPUT VARiABlES
outflow P load bslyr 2595 6764 1811 3590 1644 1578 290 16 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 3048 fl535 1485 2942 1350 1296 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
outflow P cone ppb 31328 44961 448 62 448 99 448 06 448 04 326 77 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26
P removal effiCIency % 011 009 031 007 044 044 001 017 062 017 016 009 010
v1awmo pond volume acre-II 060 513 138 135 125 120 286 076 053 091 016 066 045
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length )'IS 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preciPitatIOn IIlChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 325 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 262 50
runoff ortho pIlotal p 051 010 010 040 010 010 061 040 051 051 051 051 056
Unit runoff IlIIyr 346 324 324 448 324 324 243 448 346 346 346 346 294
IUIll ellpon Ibslac-y 025 033 033 046 033 033 011 046 025 025 025 025 017
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac..ftlyr 645 5535 1485 1457 1350 1296 3090 822 567 985 176 711 483
\4lSlream pond ac-flIyr 2402 000 000 1485 000 000 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711
lolal IIlflow ac-flIyr 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
outflow ac.flIyr 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 570 6770 1816 1782 1651 1585 1680 1005 501 870 155 628 345
upstream pond IbsIyr 2028 000 000 1811 000 000 273 39 000 000 1501 2367 000 628
lotallnflow bslyr 2598 6770 1816 3592 1651 1585 290 18 1005 501 2372 2523 628 973
net sldlmentatlOn Ibslyr 003 006 006 003 007 007 003 002 003 004 004 001 001
outflow Ibslyr 2595 6764 1811 3590 1644 1578 290 16 1003 498 .2367 2519 628 972-
I
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS I
pond mean depth feet 100 000 000 000 000 000 100 000 100 100 100 000 000'
relatIVe volume IIlches 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 002 000 0011
residence time years 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 0001
resldenee time days 001 001 002 001 003 003 000 004 006 002 001 005 003
overflow rate IlIyr 30476 03 1107 990 2263 1350 1296 326691 70 1264 5673 60 2374020 25497 00 974 2913
Inflow phos cone ppb 31363 450 02 450 02 449 32 450 02 450 02 326 80 450 02 325 02 367 53 364 02 325 02 299 56
oulIIow phos cone ppb 313 28 449 61 448 62 448 99 448 06 44804 326 77 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26
P reacllon rate 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 000 000 000 000
l-rp 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 099 100 100 100 100
lAND USE PARAMETERS
runofflotal P calc ppb 325 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 262 50
runoff coeffICient 013 012 012 017 012 012 009 017 013 013 013 013 011
d1ssolvadltolal P 051 010 010 040 010 010 061 040 051 051 051 051 056
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONOSIZE Model lor McKuslck Lake Receives outflow from Diversion to
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R Long Lake to
Brasch, November 1998 (Link 1 on SO HeOI check McKuslck McKuslCk Lake OlStnct
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 Lake Lily Lake (Lake Vol From SHE DlF8 study
case label 505 50-301 SO-302 80-303 S0-3032 Reach 303 80-304 50-305 50.306 ML-1 ML-80 ML-2 ML-3
w.ltershed area acres 60 5 24 92 23 0001 269 1081 124 498 580 16 ?
baSIn area acres 0001 01 1 0001 0001 0001 0001 35 0001 29 52 0001 0001
basm volume acre-lt 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 87 744 0001 0001
% agncuhuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P
% rndustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0
% mulll family rea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 12 0 ,0
% single fanuly rea 25 0 50 50 25 0 25 47 63 100 45 0 50
% open area 75 100 50 50 75 100 75 35 37 0 21 100 50
upstream p load lbslyr 503 40 000 000 000 000 935 000 1401 854 09 000 000 000 017
upstream outflow ac-ftIyr 2209 63 000 000 000 000 11 14 000 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032
OUTPUT VARIABLES
ot..tflow P load lbslyr 51389 055 610 231 039 932 469 5004 891 47 908 3294 017 066
outflow volume ac-ftIyr 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660 5431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
outflow P cone ppb 8500 19933 324 79 320 78 262 02 307 96 261 48 338 99 12408 179 52 8783 190 91 268 28
P removal efftctency % 000 034 007 130 400 025 039 002 000 6011 7661 455 308
vlawmo pond volume acre-It 136 009 064 025 005 000 061 339 356 172 2757 003 005
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precrpdatlOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50 362 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00
runoff ortho p'toIaI P 056 061 051 051 056 061 056 047 048 040 044 061 051
und runoff U1Iyr 294 243 346 346 294 2.43 294 408 372 448 616 243 346
unn export lbsIac-y 017 011 025 025 017 011 017 033 030 046 052 011 025
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftlyr 1472 101 691 265 056 000 660 3658 3847 1860 297 80 032 058
upstream pond ac ftlyr 2209 63 000 000 000 000 1114 000 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032
total mflow ac-ltlyr 2224 35 101 691 265 056 1114 660 5431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
outflow ac-ftlyr 2224 35 101 691 265 056 11 14 660 5431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff lbslyr 1050 055 611 234 040 000 471 3604 3738 2275 303 95 018 051
upstream pond IbaIyr 503 40 000 000 000 000 935 000 1401 854 09 000 000 000 017
totallllflow IbIIIyr 513 90 055 611 234 040 935 471 5005 891 47 2275 303 95 018 068
net sedimentation IbsIyr 000 000 000 003 002 002 002 001 000 1368 232 87 001 002
outflow Ibllyr 51389 055 610 231 039 932 469 5004 89147 908 7109 017 066
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 001 000 100 100 100 100 000 100 300 1431 100 100
relatIVe volume IOChes 000 003 000 001 005 133 33 000 000 000 1263 6745 008 005
residence hme yeara 000 000 000 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 047 250 000 000
residence tllne days 000 036 005 014 065 003 008 001 000 170 72 91188 113 041
overflow rate ltIyr 2224348 08 1013 691 2649 60 564 08 11138 38 6597 23 1562 2643820 07 641 573 324 00 900 00
InflOW phoS cone ppb 8500 200 01 325 02 325 02 262 51 308 74 262 51 339 06 12406 450 02 375 52 200 01 27674
outflow phos conc ppb 8500 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 307 96 261 48 338 99 12406 17952 8783 19091 268 28
P reaction rate 000 000 000 001 004 000 000 000 000 378 1401 005 003
1-rp 100 100 100 099 096 100 100 100 100 040 023 095 097
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50 362 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00
runoff coefficient 011 009 013 013 011 009 011 015 014 017 023 009 013
dl8SOlved/tOtal P 056 061 051 051 056 081 056 047 048 040 044 061 051
PONOSIZE Model lor McKuslck Lake
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS I
case label ML-4 ML-5 ML 6 ML-7 ML-8 ML-20 ML-21 ML-22 ML-23 ML-24 ML-25 SUBC-26 ML-27
watershed area acres 108 63 68 10 461 96 52 29 93 37 16 8 132
basin area acres 0001 16 008 001 15 164 001 01 037 001 048 001 132
basin volume acre-It 0001 32 008 0001 45 32 0001 01 037 0001 048 0001 66
% agricultural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Uldustnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mullllamlly res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% srngle laRIIIy res 100 100 50 100 100 50 0 50 100 75 50 50 66
% open area 0 0 50 0 0 50 100 50 0 25 50 50 34
upstream p load IbsIyr 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057 097 000 125 000 5199
upstream outflow ac-tllyr 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105 189 000 122 000 328 15
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load bslyr 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097 336 125 107 201 4047
outflow volume ac.fllyr 30183 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 332 31
outflow P cone ppb 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 188 83 17641 19760 189 95 230 47 376 93 233 95 320 85 4480
P removal effICiency % 000 5545 2768 147 5793 4572 120 2521 3570 273 3550 128 2789
v1awmo pond volume acre-ft 037 022 018 035 159 026 010 008 032 011 004 021 039
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yra 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preciPItatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff lOIal p ppb 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00 450 00 387 50 325 00 3.2500 365 00
runoff ortho pltaCaI P 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051 040 045 051 051 047
unll runoff InIyr 448 448 346 448 448 346 243 346 448 397 346 346 378
unll export lbsIac y 046 046 025 046 046 025 011 025 046 035 025 025 031
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftlyr 403 235 196 374 1722 276 105 064 347 122 046 230 416
upstream pond ac-lIIyr 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105 189 000 122 000 32815
lolallnllow ac-ftlyr 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 33231
outflow ac-ftlyr 30183 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 332 31
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 493 288 173 457 2106 244 057 074 425 129 041 204 413
upstream pond IbsIyr 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057 097 000 125 000 5199
lOIa1lnllow Ibslyr 3788 288 173 457 2556 244 057 130 522 129 166 204 5612
nel sedlmentallon Ibslyr 000 160 048 007 1481 112 001 033 186 004 059 003 1565
outflow Ibslyr 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097 336 125 107 201 4047
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth leet 100 200 100 010 300 195 010 100 100 010 100 010 500
relative volume IIlCMS 001 3672 110 001 706 3125 003 323 288 002 2813 001 428 08
residence time years 000 136 004 000 021 116 000 005 007 000 028 000 020
residence time days 000 496 38 1491 010 7839 422 45 035 1933 2519 030 10400 016 7249
overflow rale IIIyr 301834 80 147 2446 373 50 1397 169 105 30 1888 1449 12238 351 230 40 2518
IIlIIow phos conc ppb 4617 450 02 325 02 450 02 448 85 325 02 200 01 253 96 358 44 387 52 362 73 325 02 6213
outflow phos cone ppb 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 188 83 17641 197 60 189 95 230 47 376 93 233 95 320 85 4480
P reactlO/l rate 000 279 053 002 327 155 001 045 086 003 085 001 054
l-rp 100 045 072 099 042 054 099 075 064 097 064 099 072
LAND use PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00 450 00 387 50 325 00 325 00 365 00
runoff coeffICient 017 017 013 017 017 013 009 013 017 015 013 013 014
dlssolvedflotal P 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051 040 045 051 051 047
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONOSIZE Model lor McKuSlCk Lake Dlv Inflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R McKuslck McKuslck McKuslck
Brasch. November 1998 Landlocked Wetland Wetland Lake
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Landlocked above 852 below 852 ML47
cal*' label ML-40 ML-41 ML42 ML-43 ML.44 ML.31 ML-30 SUBC-45 SUBC 46 SUBC.63
watershed area acres 22 44 09 4 28 227 12 715 99 63 0001 0001 0001
basin area acres 036 01 02 015 028 0001 028 0001 0001 0001 24 173 46
basin volume acre-/t 036 01 02 015 028 0001 05 0001 0001 0001 10 7 160
% agrICultural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Industllal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% muttl farmly res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 10 0 0 0
% slOgle faflllly res 25 50 50 60 50 10 15 100 84 60 0 0 80
% open area 75 50 50 40 50 90 85 0 0 30 100 100 20
upatream p load bsIyr 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000 000 891 94 866 00 991 10
upatream outflow ac-Il/yr 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000 000 2844 63 2844 63 3067 24
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr O~ 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781 2153 866 00 84712 733 36
outflow volume ac-/tlyr 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 2644 63 2644 63 3067 25
outflow p cone ppb 18573 206 66 165 33 17798 21490 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30 37422 12048 11785 8797
P removal effICIency % 2925 ~09 2536 2391 3388 042 3375 023 016 021 291 218 2801
v1awmo pond volume acre-It 005 012 002 011 007 046 025 247 363 196 000 000 000
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pr8ClpltatlOn Inches ~OO 2700 2700 ~OO 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 ~OO
runoff total p ppb 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 225 00 237 50 450 00 450 00 375 00 200 00 200 00 400 00
runoff ortho pIlotal p 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040 046 061 061 044
und Nnolf In/yr 294 346 346 366 346 284 274 448 475 403 243 243 407
umt export Ibslac-y 017 025 025 029 025 013 015 046 048 034 011 011 037
POND WATER BUDGETS
Nnoff ac-Il/yr 054 127 026 122 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 000 000 000
upstream pond ac-1tIyr 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000 000 2644 63 2644 63 3067 24
total Inflow ac-1tIyr 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 2844 63 2844 63 3067 25
outflow acftlyr 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 2644 63 2644 63 3067 25
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 038 112 023 116 071 305 177 3266 4789 2157 000 000 000
upstream pond IbsIyr 000 O~ 101 093 000 000 000 000 000 000 891 94 866 00 991 10
total Inflow IbsIyr 038 139 124 209 071 305 177 3266 4789 2157 891 94 866 00 991 10
net sec:llmentatlOn bslyr 011 036 032 050 024 001 060 008 008 005 2595 1887 257 74
outflow lbsIyr 027 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781 2153 866 00 847 12 733 36
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth leet 100 100 100 100 100 100 179 100 100 100 042 040 348
relallVe volume Inches 1802 213 2083 332 938 001 493 000 000 000 1333333 33 93333333 1273209549
residence lime years 067 006 010 005 035 000 018 000 000 000 000 000 005
reSIdence time days 243 54 2020 3533 1666 12674 007 6666 001 001 002 138 097 1904
overflow rate Il/yr 150 1807 1033 2191 288 4984 92 978 26705 25 39150 54 2116328 11019 152 87 6668
IOfIow phos cone ppb 262 51 283 42 221 51 233 91 325 02 225 01 237 51 450 02 450 02 375 02 12409 120 48 11888
outflow phos cone ppb 185 73 206 66 16533 17798 21490 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30 37422 120 48 t17 85 8797
P reactlOf\ rate 058 051 046 041 078 000 077 000 000 000 003 002 047
1-rp 071 073 075 076 066 100 066 100 100 100 097 098 074
LAND USE PARAMETERS n
~
runoff total P calc ppb 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 225 00 237 50 450 00 450 00 375 00 200 00 200 00 400 00
Nnoff coelflcl8nt 011 013 013 014 013 010 010 017 018 015 009 009 015
dlssolvedltotelP 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040 046 061 061 044
PONOSIZE Model 10' McKuslCk Lake
W Walke, July t987, adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES
Colse label
walershed area
basIn area
basin volume
% agnculturalland
% mdustnal
% mubllamdy res
% smgle lamlly reS
% open area
upstream p load
upstream outflow
OUTPUT VARIABLES
ouUIow p load
outlIow volume
outflow p cone
p remova/ elltctency
v/awmo pond volume
UNITS
acres
acrea
acre-ll
Iblolyr
ac-1tIyr
IbIIyr
ac-1tIyr
ppb
%
acre-It
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs
season prectpltatlOn Inchea
runofflotal p ppb
runoll or1ho JlI10lal P
umt runoff
und export
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoll
upstream pond
total mllow
oulllow
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff fbslyr
1418lream pond bslyr
Iotal mfIow IbsIyr
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr
outflow Ibslyr
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean dapth leet
relatIVe volume Inchea
resrdeneellme years
resrdencellme days
overflow rate lIIyr
mllow phos cone ppb
ou1lIow phos conc ppb
p reaction rate
t-rp
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runolllotal P calc ppb
runoll coeffICient
dIssoIvedl101al P
-
-
InIyr
Ibslac-y
ac.1tIyr
ac-1tIyr
ac-ltlyr
ac-lIIyr
-
AnalysIS McKuslCk Lake DIVersion Impac1 (1996 WILMS Input)
ScenarIO Loadmgs to McKuslCk L ,wi dlVel8lOn,
(NWL lor lake IS 852, wetland treatment, no NURP pondlng lor SO-201-205, 305)
Date 1-11-99 (Includeall8ld checked pond data)
SUmmary Stats
M L watershed (exlstlng conditions, pre-dlVerslOn)
Orract 234
Indrract 673
Total 907 wsJlake area ratIO
Water lII'8a 67
GRAND TOTAl 974
M L watershed (post-dlVerSlOn)
Orrect
Indrract
Total
Water area
GRAND TOTAL
234
3,583
3,817
394
4,211
wsllake area ratIO
Agncultural
IndustnaVcommerclal
Multifamily
% single lamlly res
% open area
P-COEFF RUNOFF COEFF
450 0 12
350 0 488
450 0 227
450 0166
200 0 09
Notes Calibration run lor WILMS under 1996 conddlons,
Actual wq lor Lily Lake ou\lfow, pr8Clp IS lor 1998 water year
Assumes McK Lake NWL IS 852 and that diverted water
passes through north wetland, no NURP onds
lor 50-201-205, 305
Key lor pond InlormatlOn numencal scnpts
1 - Both wet volume and area Irom HydroCad Input
2 - Pond area only from HydroCad mput (generally shows no wet volume)
3 - Wet volume only Irom HydroCad Input
4 - Pond area lrom 200 scale topo maps
5 - Wet volume Irom lIeld check
6 Wet volume from as.bullts
7 - Pond area, wet voIumelrom OPH SWMP
8 . Volume, depth assumed
9 - Volume lrom E Peters (estImated)
I.eld checked ponds checked In January, 1999
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
78
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
WISCONSIN LAKE MODEL SPREADSHEET
VERSION 2 01 - AUGUST 1996
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Although thIs model has been tested by WDNR, no warranty IS
expressed or Implied See users manual prior model use
************* *.*****.***** ***_....***** ****....***** *****.....*** ************* ************'* ... **
*
*
*
*
*
LAKE 10 McKuslck Lake, StJllwater(NWL = 853, w/o ponds)
To auto load wtrshd data. enter county 10, hold CTRL and type L
WATERSHED COUNTY IDENT NUMBER = 56 CO NAME St CroiX
*
*
*
************* ****'*..*..... IIAA"'.l"AAAAA" ************* ************* ************* ************* *** **
HYDROLOGIC AND MORPHOMETRIC MODULE
*
=================================================================
*
ENGLISH METRIC
TRIB DRAINAGE AREA = 4211 0 Ac 1 70E+07 m^2
TOTAL UNIT RUNOFF = 87 In 0222 m
ANNUAL RUNOFF VOLUME = 3067 0 Ac-Ft 3 78E+06 m^3
LAKE SURFACE AREA <As> = 46 0 Ac 1 86E+05 m^2
LAKE VOLUME <V> = 205 0 Ac-ft 2 53E+05 m^3
LAKE MEAN DEPTH <z> = 446 Ft 1 36 m
PRECIP - EVAP = 6 2 In 0 16 m
HYDRAULIC LOADING = 3090 8 Ac-FtlYr 3 81 E+06 m^3Nr
AREAL WATER LOAD <qs> = 672E+01 FtlYr 205E+01 mNr
LAKE FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1508 Nr Tw = 007 Yr
************* ************* ************* ************* ************* ************* ****"''''''''AAA AJ. .... ***
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
Page 1
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*.**********. ************* ************* *.***.***.... ...._.*__._._ ....********* ....******'*'.* .*. "'Ill
PHOSPHORUS LOADING MODULE
=================================================================
--LOADING (Kg/Ha- Yr)--
LAND USE AREA MOST LOADING
(AC) LOW LIKELY HIGH PERCENT
ROW CROP AG 00 050 150 300 00
MIXED AG 00 080 100 140 00
PASTURE/GRASS 00 010 030 050 00
HD URBAN 00 100 130 200 00
MD URBAN 00 040 050 080 00
RURAL RES 00 005 010 025 00
WETLANDS 00 010 010 010 00
FOREST 00 005 009 018 00
OTHER LAND USE 1 4211 0 018 028 038 989
OTHER LAND USE 2 00 000 000 000 00
LAKE SURFACE 460 010 027 100 11
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
POINT SOURCE WATER LOADING (m^3/Yr) =
POINT SOURCE PHOS (Kg/Yr) 0 00
SEP TANK OUTPUT(kg/cp-yr) 030
# capita-years = 0 00
% P RETAINED BY SOIL = 98
SEP TANK LOADING (Kg/Yr) 0 00
o OOE+OO
000 000
050 080
*
00
*
*
*
90 80
000 000
*
00
*
*
TOTAL LOADINGS (Lb) =
TOTAL LOADINGS (Kg) =
680E+02 104E+03 147E+03
309E+02 4 74E+02 666E+02
1000
1000
*
*
*
AREAL LOADING(LblAc-Yr) = 148E+01 227E+01 319E+01
AREAL LOADING(mg/m^2-yr)= 166E+03 254E+03 358E+03
% TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REDUCTION = 0
*
*
*
*
To view a graph of phosphorus Inputs expressed as percentages
of the total phosphorus load, select the LOAD GRAPH tab When you
are finslshed vIewing the graph, select the WILMS200 tab
************* *'*4AAAA,I,..U.A44 ************* ................U~A.......U,... AA.................."AA.A." ************* "....LA"........................ *** ***
*
*
*
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
*
I
-----1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 I
*
*
*
*
*
*
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
PHOSPHORUS PREDICTION MODULE
************* ************* .......******* ************* ************* *..................".\4 ........"................... ***.**
..
=================================================================
THE OBSERVED SPRING TOTAL PHOSPHORUS =
THE OBSERVED GROWING SEASON PHOSPHORUS :
o mg/m^3
110 mg/m^3
Enter the spnng and/or the growing season P concentration
The lake models predict either an SPO or a GSM P concentration
A predicted phosphorus concentration will appear only for those
models where the observed value has been entered An "NA" IS
returned If a model IS not calculated
Spring Overturn P cone = SPO, Growing Season Mean P cone = GSM
LAKE PHOSPHORUS MODELS
PREDICTED
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
(mg/m^3)
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR MODEL (GSM)
52 80 113
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN,1981,ARTIFICAl LAKE MODEL (SPO)
4 RECKHOW, 1979, NATURAL LAKE MODEL (GSM)
46 70 99
5 RECKHOW,1977, ANOXIC LAKE MODEL (GSM)
71 109 153
6 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 m/yr (GSM)
56 86 121
7 RECKHOW, 1977 OXIC LAKES qs > 50 mJyr (GSM)
#N/A #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER 1977, GENERAL LAKE MODEL (SPO)
#N/A #N1A #N1A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO and GSM)
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL (SPO)
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs < 10 m/yr #N1A
PRETENTION COEFF <R> qs >= 10 m1yr 047
**************AA AA AA "A"AA********************AAAA A A &4.\ ""'''4.1. ......... "'4******
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
80
#N/A
#N1A
70
109
86
#N/A
#N/A
83
#N/A
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
*
..
..
..
*
..
*
*
..
..
*
*-
Page 3
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
**********************************...*********************************
UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS MODULE
=================================================================
LAKE RESPONSE MODEL
PREDICTED
MINUS
OBSERVEIPERCENT
(mg/m^3) DIFF
1 WALKER, 1987 RESERVOIR 80 #DIVlOI
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N1A
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 #N/A #N/A
4 RECKHOW, 1979 GENERAL -40 -36
5 RECKHOW, 1977 ANOXIC -1 -1
6 RECKHOW, 1977 qs<50mlyr -24 -22
7 RECKHOW, 1977 qs>50mlyr #N/A #N/A
8 WALKER, 1977 GENERAL #N1A #N1A
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 28 51
10 DILLON-RIGLER-KIRCHNER #N/A #N/A
<= Range WIthin which 95% of the observatIons should fall
See users manual discussion on the use of these models
52
#N/A
#N/A
44
72
54
#N/A
#N/A
70 PERCENT
CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL
115
#N/A <=
#N/A <=
104
154
126
#N/A
#N/A
....
.
*
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
*
.
************* ********..... ****.....&&1......&& ........&.........&.1...."...... AAO\..........L...***** ******....*** ****H""'" *** ***
.
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
.
.
.
.
.
.
Page 4
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
************* ************* **...*******.. ************* ************* ************* ************* *** ***
PARAMETER RANGE MODULE
Model Input values MUST be WIthin the ranges listed below
WILMS displays FIT If Inputs satiSfy conditions, NO FIT If not
PARAMETERS
=================================================================
*
*
*
*
*
********'***** ************* ************* ******.*.**** ************* ************* ************* *** ***
AREAL WATER LOADING <qs=zlTw> = 205E+01 m/yr
INFLOW PHOSPHORUS CONC <LTwlz> = 0124 mg/l
MEAN DEPTH <z> = 1 36 m
FLUSHING RATE <p> = 1508 Iyr
HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME <Tw> = 0 07 yr
AREAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING <L> = 2544 45 mg/m^2-yr
P = PREDICTED IN LAKE PHOS CONCENTRATION mg/m^3
Model data base sIZe
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 WALKER, 1985 RESERVOIR MODEL
1 5 < z < 58 m 0 13 < Tw < 1 91 yr
0014 < LTw/z < 1047 mg/l
<NO FIT>
P=
2 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P < 2600 mg/m^3 30< L < 7600 mg/m^2-yr #N/A
02< z <307 m 0001< P <183/yr p=
3 CANFIELD-BACHMANN, 1981 ARTIFICIAL LAKE MODEL
6< P <1500 mg/m^3 40< L <820,000 mglm^2Iyr #N/A
06< z <59 m 0019< P <18oolYr P=
4 RECKHOW, 1979 NATURAL LAKE MODEL
4< P <135 mg/m^3 70< L <31,400 mg/m^2-yr
075< qs <187 rnIyr
<FIT>
P=
5 RECKHOW,1977 ANOXIC LAKE MODEL
17< P < 610 mg/m^3 0 024< LTw/z< 0621mgll
<FIT>
P=
6 RECKHOW,1977 OXIC LAKES qs < 50 mlyr
P < 60 mg/m^3 L Tw/z < 298 mgll
<NO FIT>
p=
7 RECKHOW.1977 LAKES WITH qs > 50 m/yr
P < 135 mglm^3 L Tw/z < 0 178 mg/l
Tw<025yr z<13m
#N/A
P=
8 WALKER,1977 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
P < 900 mglm^3 L Tw/z < 1 0 mgll
#N/A
P=
9 VOLLENWEIDER, 1975 GENERAL LAKE MODEL
NOT AVAILABLE
<FIT>
P=
(41)
(290)
#NJA
(433)
#N/A
(47)
(21)
109
(33)
86
(28)
#N/A
(105)
#N/A
80
70
83
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10 DILLON, RIGLER, KIRCHNER, 1975 LAKE MODEL
P < 15 mg/m^3 107 < L < 2210 mg/m^2-yr #NJA
1 5< qs < 223 m/yr 0 21 < P < 63/yr P= #NJA
************* ************* ************* ************* ************* *******...... **.********** *** ***
WI Lake Model Spreadsheet
(15)
*
*
*
Page 5
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslCk Lake Watershed Information from HydroCad model prepared Outflow from AnalysIs McKuslCk Lake DIVersIOn Impact (1996 WILMS Input)
W Walker July 1987, c1dapted by R by Ene Peters (BRA) for Stillwater AUAR OPH east of Hwy 5 ScenarIO Loadings to McKuslCk L ,wi dIVersIOn.
Brasch, November 1998 Oak ParK Heights Sub Dlstnct Market Place SubdistrICt (NWL lor lake IS 853. no NURP pondlng lor 50-201-205, 305)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 4.8 field checked 1 4,8 48
case label OPH-13 OPH-14 OPH-12 OPH-150PH-ll MP-12 MP-121 Reach-13 MP-99 MP-l MP-2 MP-98 MP-5
watershed area acres 59 64 29 38 78 96 99 0001 234 796 212 167 154
basin area acres 345 097 1 1 07 38 03 08 0001 12 04 0001 044 015
basin volume acre-It 67 29 2 28 131 064 16 0001 48 04 0001 088 03
'" agncuhuralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Industnal 0 0 0 100 66 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100
% mulll family res 0 0 0 0 11 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0
% single fallllly res 100 100 100 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% open area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load bslyr 000 000 000 647 5004 000 000 574 000 1020 000 000 1145
upstream outflow ac-ftlyr 000 000 000 1083 9850 000 000 998 000 2569 000 000 2053
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibslyr 1258 1308 647 2437 6509 289 286 573 1020 8293 2209 1145 2233
outflow volume ac-ftIyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 166 10 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 37441
outflow p ClOnc ppb 210 08 201 38 21988 17061 144 17 21653 207 84 21150 14602 269 26 349 21 205 09 21945
,
P removal elhctency % 5332 5525 5114 4721 4603 5189 5382 030 5828 1136 023 4141 1889
vlawmo pond volume acre-It 204 221 100 386 626 045 047 000 238 811 216 190 157,
I
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff totaJ p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00
runoff ortho pIlotal p 040 040 040 036 037 040 040 040 036 036 036 036 036
unllrunoff trIyr 448 448 448 1318 1040 613 813 613 1318 t318 1318 1318 1318
unll export lbsIac y 046 046 046 104 090 062 062 062 104 104 104 104 104
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftlyr 2204 2390 1063 4172 6761 490 506 000 2569 8762 2328 2053 1691
upstream pond acftlyr 000 000 000 1063 9850 000 000 996 000 2569 000 000 2053
lotal.ntlow ac-ftlyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 16610 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744
outflow ac-ftlyr 2204 2390 1083 5256 16610 490 506 996 2569 11331 2328 2053 3744
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 2695 2924 1325 3969 7057 600 618 000 2444 8336 2215 1953 1609
upstream pond Ibslyr 000 000 000 647 5004 000 000 574 000 1020 000 000 11 45
lotallnflow Ibslyr 2695 2924 1325 4617 120 61 800 618 574 2444 93 '55 2215 1953 2753
net secfllnentatlOn Ibslyr 1437 1615 678 2180 5552 311 333 002 1425 1063 005 809 520
outflow Ibslyr 1258 1308 647 2437 6509 289 286 573 1020 8293 2209 1145 2233
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feat 194 299 182 400 345 213 200 100 400 100 100 200 200
relatIVe volume Inches 821 328 499 181 523 352 854 5286 504 012 000 116 048
residence time years 030 012 018 005 008 013 032 000 019 000 000 004 001
residence time days 11097 4428 6740 1945 2879 4764 11550 004 6819 129 002 1584 292
overflow rate ftlyr 639 2464 985 7508 4371 1634 632 9960 14 2141 263 26 23277 60 4667 24961
Inflow phos ClOne ppb 450 02 450 02 450 02 323 20 267 14 450 02 450 02 212 13 350 02 303 76 350 02 350 02 27054
outflow phos ClOnc ppb 21008 20138 21988 170 61 144 17 21653 207 84 21150 14602 269 26 34921 205 09 21945
P reactIOn rate 245 276 214 169 158 224 252 000 335 014 000 121 029
l-rp 047 045 049 053 054 048 046 100 042 089 100 059 081
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff tOlal P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 384 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00 350 00
runoff coefflCMlnt 017 017 017 049 039 023 023 023 049 049 049 049 049
cltssolvecfllotal P 040 040 040 036 037 040 040 040 036 036 036 036 036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONOSlZE Model for McKuslCk Lake Receives flow from Lake Elmo Subdistrict
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R OPH east of Hwy 5 depth as rec by EP depths for LE-7 & 4 rec by EP
Brasch, November 1998 ',eld checl<ed 'Ield checked field checked field checked check check check
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 4,8 2 2 4,8 4,8 Pond 10 2,9 2 2 2 2,9 29 2
case label MP-7 MP-ll MP8 MP-9 MP-14 (Rch-l0) LE.l LE-3 LE.5 LE-6 LE-7 LE 4 LE-8
watershed area acres 758 772 349 1474 129 258 366 45 99 329 91 1059 325
basm area acres 33 027 035 3 06 23 34 03 048 0001 35 175 0001
basm volume acre-It 132 0001 0001 75 06 69 68 0001 0001 0001 35 35 0001
% agrICultural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% mdustrlal 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 89 0 34
% multi family res 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% smgle family res 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0
% Qpen area 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 11 26 64
upstream p load Ibslyr 198 17 000 3521 5696 000 250 41 000 000 000 000 361 6351 5830
upstream outflow ac-ftIyr 350 fO 000 2883 4668 000 54920 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 179 76 3521 5696 6184 881 225 89 264 049 109 361 5929 5830 6927
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 433 33 2883 4666 10171 1416 57753 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 15913
outflow p conc ppb 152 63 449 33 449 14 223 70 228 85 143 91 131 11 19975 199 85 19947 223 46 15023 160 15
P removal etltclency % 3519 015 010 5025 3462 1856 3445 013 008 027 3111 4168 001
vlawmo pond volume acre.f1 771 267 165 510 131 262 069 008 019 062 842 323 1 51
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 350 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 247 00
runoff ortho ~a1 p 036 040 040 040 036 036 061 061 061 061 039 045 051
unllrunoff In/yr f318 448 613 448 1318 1318 243 243 243 243 1199 395 604
und export lbsIac-y 104 046 062 046 104 104 011 011 011 011 091 034 034
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftlyr 8323 2883 1783 5505 1416 2833 741 091 200 666 9095 3485 1634
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 350 10 000 2883 4666 000 549 20 000 000 000 000 666 10794 14279
total mllow ac-ftlyr 433 33 2883 4666 101 71 1416 57753 741 091 200 666 9762 14279 15913
outflow ac-ftlyr 433 33 2883 4666 10171 1416 57753 741 091 200 666 9762 142 79 15913
POND PHOSPHORUS BUOGETS
runoff Ibsfyr 7918 3527 2180 6734 1346 2695 403 050 109 362 8245 3647 1097
upstream pond IbsIyr 19817 000 3521 5696 000 250 41 000 000 000 000 361 6351 5830
total Inflow Ibslyr 27735 3527 5702 12430 1348 277 36 403 050 109 362 8606 9998 6928
net sedlmentallon Ibslyr 9759 005 006 6246 466 5147 139 000 000 001 2677 4167 001
outflow Ibslyr 17976 3521 5696 6184 881 225 89 264 049 109 361 5929 5830 6927
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 400 000 000 250 100 300 200 000 000 100 100 200 100
relatIVe volume Inches 428 000 000 368 114 658 2477 003 001 000 104 2712 000
residence time years 003 000 000 007 004 001 092 000 000 000 004 025 000
residence time days 11 12 001 001 2691 1546 436 334 88 040 018 005 1309 8947 000
ov81llow rate ftlyr 131 31 106 79 133 31 3390 2361 251 10 218 304 418 6662 25 2789 816 159134 03
mflow phos cone ppb 235 48 450 02 449 59 449 62 350 02 17670 200 01 200 01 200 01 20001 324 37 25761 160 17
outflow phllS cone ppb 152 63 449 33 449 14 223 70 228 85 14391 131 11 199 75 199 85 199 47 223 46 150 23 160 15
P reac1JOll rate 084 000 000 203 081 028 080 000 000 000 068 123 000
1-11' 065 100 100 050 065 081 066 100 100 100 069 058 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 350 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 350 00 350 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 200 00 333 50 385 00 247 00
runoff coeftlC18nl 049 017 023 017 049 049 009 009 009 009 044 015 022,
dlssolveclltotal P 036 040 040 040 036 036 061 061 061 061 039 045 051/
I
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslCk lake
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998 Legends and Liberty Dev (west of Long Lake)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 1 1 1 1 Landlocked 2 2 1 1 1
ease label LLD-32 LLD-33 LLD-34 LLD-35 LLD-36 LLD 371 LLD-37 LLD-38 LLD 39 LLD-40 LLD-41 LLD.42 LLD-43
watershed area acres 9 29 374 44 9 76 76 55 15 26 126 141 239
basin area acrea 065 065 1 075 08 0001 01 026 04 086 07 09 0001
baSin volume acreft 0001 26 62 075 3 OOOt 0001 0001 02 14 32 04 0001
% agrlCulluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% multi family res 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% lingle tal1llly rea 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 0 100 100 100
% open area 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 100 0 0 0
upstream p load IbsIyr 000 561 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674
upstream outllow ac-llIyr 000 460 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050
OUTPUT VARIABLES I
outllow p load IbsIyr 561 755 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 674 17 62 I
oultlow volume ac-llIyr 460 1543 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943 I
oUlllow p conc ppb 449 17 180 10 12440 253 56 109 72 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 13679 14718 236 27 333 69
P removal eftlClency % 019 5996 5966 4366 4514 210 049 027 1630 3161 6483 2100 024 I
vlawmo pond volume acre-fl 043 100 129 015 017 026 026 019 003 005 044 049 083!
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitatIOn Inches 2700 2700 :!T 00 2700 :!TOO 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff tola' p ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff or1ho pIlOlal p 040 040 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040
urnlrunoff wlyr 613 448 448 448 243 448 448 448 243 243 448 448 448
und export Ibsfac-y 062 046 046 046 011 046 046 046 011 011 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftIyr 460 1083 1397 164 182 284 264 205 030 053 471 527 893
upstream pond acftlyr 000 460 1543 000 000 000 182 466 836 000 053 523 1050
total mtlow ac-ftIyr 460 1543 2940 164 182 284 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943
outflow ae-llIyr 460 1543 2940 164 182 264 466 672 866 053 523 1050 1943
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDOETS
runoff Ibslyr 562 1325 1709 201 099 347 347 251 017 029 576 644 1092
upstream pond bsfyr 000 561 755 000 000 000 054 400 762 000 020 209 674
tolal mtlow bsfyr 562 1886 2464 201 099 347 402 651 779 029 595 853 1766
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 001 1131 1470 088 045 007 002 002 127 009 386 179 004
outflOW bsfyr 561 755 994 113 054 340 400 649 652 020 209 674 1762
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 000 400 620 100 375 100 001 000 050 163 457 044 100
relatlV8 volume IIlChea 001 648 1198 1232 4444 001 001 001 1778 7179 1836 205 000
residence lime years 000 017 021 046 165 000 000 000 002 266 061 004 000
rll8ldence time days 008 6151 7698 16658 600 82 013 008 005 843 970 56 223 22 1391 002
overtlow rate ftIyr 107 2374 2940 219 228 2838 60 4661 2583 2166 061 748 1167 1942560
Inflow phos cone ppb 450 02 449n 308 36 450 02 200 01 450 02 31696 356 60 330 80 200 01 41851 299 09 334 50
outflow phos cone ppb 449 17 180 10 12440 253 56 109 72 440 59 31542 355 62 276 89 13679 14718 236 27 333 69
P reac:tJon rate 000 374 367 138 150 002 000 000 023 068 524 034 000
1-rp 100 040 040 056 055 098 100 100 084 068 035 079 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff coefficient 023 017 017 017 009 017 017 017 009 009 017 017 017
dts'lOhtedftotal P 040 040 040 040 061 040 040 040 061 061 040 040 040
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONDSIZE Model tor McKuSlCk Lake Outflow from LLD
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R west of LL (Link 3 on LL HeDI
Brasch, November 1998 Long Lake-51 03, 5105, 5106 and linked watersheds
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 1 1 Long L Long L Long L Dummy 2 1 1 1
case label LLD-60 LLD-44 LLD-45 LLD-31 Dlrect30 Dlrect47 Dlrect46 LongL LL 1 LL 2 LL-3 LL-4 LL-5
watershed area acres 73 458 157 14 207 81 138 0001 152 77 234 7 96
basm area acres 0001 19 033 015 0001 0001 0001 0001 2 0001 0001 0001 0001
basin volume acre-It 0001 10 087 056 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
% agrICultural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% multi family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% single family res 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 0 100 100 100 100 100
% open area 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0
upstream p load IbsIyr 000 000 248 50 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412
upstream outflow ac-ftIyr 000 000 114303 000 000 000 000 120219 000 000 855 000 1991
OUTPUT VARIABLES
oudlow p load Ib8Iyr 326 248 50 253 51 000 227 363 1 51 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844
outflow volume ac-flIyr 273 114303 114889 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349
outflow P conc ppb 440 23 7999 8118 195 50 19915 441 15 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 44531
P removal effICIency % 218 4086 084 5656 043 197 064 000 007 207 036 226 026
vlawmo pond volume acre-ft 025 722 054 048 039 028 026 000 053 027 081 024 033
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 tOO 100 tOO 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpttatlOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 450 00 399 50 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff ortho p{total p 040 035 040 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 040 040 040
und runoff Infyr 448 673 448 448 243 448 243 243 448 448 448 448 448
Unit export lbsIac-y 046 061 046 046 011 046 011 011 046 046 046 046 046
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-flIyr 273 7797 586 523 419 303 279 000 568 288 874 261 359
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 000 106506 114303 000 000 000 000 120219 000 000 855 000 1991
total mflow ac-flIyr 27J 114303 114889 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349
outflow ac-ftlyr 273 1143 03 114889 523 419 303 279 120219 568 288 1729 261 2349
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff IbsIyr 334 8467 717 640 228 370 152 000 694 352 1069 320 439
upstream pond IbsIyr 000 335 52 248 50 000 000 000 000 277 38 000 000 1038 000 2412
totallflflow Ib&Iyr 334 420 19 255 67 640 228 370 152 277 38 694 352 2107 320 2851
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 007 171 69 215 640 001 007 001 000 000 007 008 007 008
outflow IbsIyr 326 248 50 253 51 227 363 1 51 277 38 694 344 2100 313 2844
HVDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 392 264 373 100 100 100 100 000 100 100 100 100
relative volume Inches 001 5264 401 289 001 001 001 133 33 000 001 000 001 001
residence time years 000 013 000 011 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
residence time days 013 4854 028 3909 009 012 013 000 006 013 002 014 002
overflow rate flIyr 2726 55 2946 3481 49 3486 419175 3025 35 2794 50 120219181 284 2875 95 17293 05 2614 50 2349315
IIlflow phos conc ppb 450 02 135 25 8187 450 02 200 01 450 02 200 01 8489 450 02 450 02 448 37 450 02 446 49
outflow phos conc ppb 440 23 7999 8118 195 50 19915 441 15 198 73 8489 449 72 440 71 446 76 439 83 44531
P reactIOn rata 002 117 001 300 000 002 001 000 000 002 000 002 000
1-rp 098 059 099 043 100 098 099 100 100 098 100 098 100
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 399 50 4&0 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 200 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00
runoff coeffICient 017 025 017 017 009 017 009 009 017 017 017 017 017'
dlssolvedltolal P 040 040 040 040 061 040 061 061 040 040 I
040 040 040;
I
I
PONDSIZE Model for McKuSlCk Lake ReceIVes outflow ReceIVes outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R from MP from OPH, LE
Brasch. November 1998 depth as rec by EP (Link 1 on LL HCD) (link 2 on LL HCD)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2,9 1 2 1 1 2 1 no entry (HCe 1 2
case label LL 6 LL 7 LL-8 Reach-9 LL-15 LL-14 LL-13 LL-12 LL-ll LL-3O LL-20 LL-21 LL-22
watelShed area acres 182 273 45 39 284 355 478 86 378 109 5 374 298 266
baslll area acres 0001 24 0001 0001 5 142 0001 089 158 1 0001 0001 242
basin volume acre-ft 0001 48 0001 0001 0001 246 0001 0001 16 05 0001 0001 0001
% agrlCuIluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0
% Industnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
% mulll family r.. 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0
% single 'aRIIIy res 100 100 100 100 25 100 100 0 53 0 15 0 0
% open area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 47 100 0 27 0
upstream p load Ibslyr 000 3667 000 199 225 89 000 000 000 000 000 000 7999 000
upstream outflow ac-ftlyr 000 3029 000 168 57753 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000
OUTPUT VARIABLES
oulflow p load Ibslyr 824 2430 199 370 242 44 757 2176 095 926 1072 1286 9323 2777
outflow volume ac-ltlyr 680 4049 168 314 59106 1326 1785 174 11 08 2217 1068 194 05 2921
outflow p cone ppb 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53 15091 209 99 448 45 199 92 30816 177 93 442 96 17676 349 88
P removal etflClency % 090 5055 341 187 000 5334 035 005 733 1104 157 001 004,
v1awmo pond volume acre-ft 063 094 016 013 125 123 165 016 103 205 099 118 270.
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS 100:
season length YIS 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season preclpdatlOn InChes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 450 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 4SO 00 382 50 3SO 00
runoff OI1ho pI10lal p 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 061 050 061 015 046 036
unit runoff In/yr 448 448 448 448 572 448 448 243 352 243 343 513 1318
unit export Ibs/ac-y 046 046 048 048 058 048 046 011 026 011 035 044 104
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftIyr 680 1020 168 146 1353 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 1274 2921
upstream pond ec-ftlyr 000 3029 000 168 57753 000 000 000 000 000 000 181 31 000
totaJ Inflow ac-ftIyr 680 4049 16B 314 591 06 1326 1785 174 11 08 2217 1088 194 05 2921
outflow ac-ftlyr 680 4049 168 314 59106 1326 1785 174 1108 2217 1068 194 05 2921
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff IbsIyr B31 1247 206 178 1655 1622 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 1325 2779
upstream pond Ibs/yr 000 3667 000 199 225 B9 000 000 000 000 000 000 7999 000
totallllflow bsIyr 831 4915 206 377 242 44 1822 2184 095 1001 1205 1306 9324 2779
net sedimentatIOn bsIyr 008 2484 007 007 001 865 008 000 073 133 021 001 001
outflow Ibslyr B24 2430 199 370 242 44 757 2176 095 928 1072 1286 9323 2777
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feat 100 200 100 100 000 173 100 000 010 050 100 100 000
relative volume Inches 000 1271 002 002 000 5009 000 002 390 061 000 000 000
residence lime years 000 012 000 000 000 1 B6 000 000 014 002 000 000 000
residence hme days OOS 4327 022 012 000 ffT7 19 002 021 5271 B23 003 000 001
overflow rate ftlyr 6797 70 1687 168075 313740 11821 093 17B53 30 196 070 2217 10878 64 194047 95 1207
Inflow phos cone ppb 45002 446 61 450 02 441 Bl lSO 91 4SO 02 450 02 200 01 332 52 200 01 4SO 02 176 78 3SO 02
outflow phos cone ppb 445 95 220 85 434 68 433 53 lSO 91 209 99 44B 45 19992 308 16 17793 44296 176 76 349 88
P reacbon rate 001 207 004 002 000 245 000 000 009 014 002 000 000
Np 099 049 097 098 100 047 100 100 093 OB9 098 100 100
LAND use PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 4SO 00 450 00 450 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 4SO 00 200 00 332 50 200 00 450 00 382 50 3SO 00
runoff coefficient 017 017 017 017 021 017 017 009 013 009 013 019 049
dlssolvedltotal P 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 061 OSO 061 015 046 036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONDSIZE Madel lor McKuslck lake ReceIves outflow
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R Portion of Legends and llb8l1y draInage Stillwater Dlstnct from llD below long lake
Brasch, November 1998 linked to dlv below Long lake Future pond (link 2 on SO HCO)
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 2 Reach wet volume 2 1
case lilbel ll-23 Dlr-l0 01r-16 long Lake WMA Pond LlO-l0l llO-50 llD-l02 llD-52 50-201 50202 Reach 104 50-105
watershed area acres 285 252 595 0001 398 50 152 240 265 50 48 0001 417
baSin area acres 046 0001 0001 933 169 0001 0001 0001 087 1 1 0001 068
baSin volume acre-lt 0001 0001 0001 380 338 0001 0001 0001 4 0001 0001 0001 055
"" agnculluralland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0
"" Illdustnal 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0
% multifamily res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
% slIIllle family res 0 20 50 0 20 0 100 100 36 0 0 0 0
% open area 70 80 50 100 80 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0
upstream p load Ibslyr 121 00 000 000 747 17 50467 000 549 QOO 121 97 000 000 11169 326
upstresm outflow ac-ltlyr 223 25 000 000 216277 216277 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 154 09 273
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 12994 404 1511 504 ffl 468 49 549 1241 109 57 7947 1644 1578 111 67 2028
outflow volume ac-ltIyr 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19 1013 1580 8964 127 63 1350 1296 154 09 2402
outfIowpconc ppb 201 98 249 00 324 34 8585 7935 199 65 288 86 449 71 229 09 448 06 448 04 266 65 31058
P removal effiCIency % 001 041 021 3246 833 018 025 007 4529 044 044 002 3082
vlawmo pond volume acre-ll 124 055 159 000 087 094 053 830 205 125 120 000 197
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season precipitation Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 245 00 250 00 325 00 200 00 250 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00
runoff ortho pItoIal p 054 057 051 061 057 061 040 040 037 010 010 061 040
unit runoff InIyr 565 284 346 243 284 243 448 448 1005 324 324 243 613
unit export Ibslac-y 031 016 025 011 016 011 046 046 088 033 033 011 062
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ltIyr 1343 596 1714 000 942 1013 568 8964 2219 1350 1296 000 2130
upstream pond acltlyr 223 25 000 000 216277 216277 000 1013 000 10544 000 000 154 09 273
totalmflow ac-ltIyr 236 68 596 1714 216277 2172 19 1013 1580 8964 127 63 1350 1296 154 09 2402
oulllow ac-ftlyr 236 68 596 1714 216277 217219 1013 1580 8964 12763 1350 1296 154 09 2402
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff IbsIyr 894 405 1514 000 640 550 694 109 64 2328 1651 1585 000 2605
upstream pond Ibslyr 12100 000 000 747 17 504 67 000 549 000 12197 000 000 11169 326
to1allnflow Ib8Iyr 129 95 405 1514 747 17 51107 550 1244 109 64 145 25 1651 1585 11169 2931
net secllmentallOn IbsIyr 001 002 003 242 50 4258 001 003 008 6578 007 007 002 903
outflow Ibslyr 129 94 404 1511 504 67 468 49 549 1241 109 57 7947 1644 1578 11167 2028
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mesn depth feet 000 100 100 407 200 100 100 100 460 000 000 100 081
relative volume Inches 000 000 o 00 50666666 67 9687 000 000 000 487 000 000 133 33 070
residence time years 000 000 000 018 002 000 000 000 003 000 000 000 002
reSidence time days 000 006 002 6413 568 004 002 000 1144 003 003 000 836
overflow rat. ItIyr 514 53 5964 84 1713600 2318 12853 1012500 15802 20 89640 00 14670 1350 1296 15408767 3533
Inflow phos cone ppb 202 00 250 01 325 02 127 10 8658 200 01 289 60 450 4>2 41872 450 02 450 02 266 69 44891
outflow phos conc ppb 201 98 249 00 324 34 8585 7935 199 65 288 86 449 71 229 09 448 06 448 04 266 65 31058
P reac110fl rate 000 000 000 071 010 000 000 000 151 000 000 000 064
1-rp 100 100 100 068 092 100 100 100 055 100 100 100 069
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff 10111 P calC ppb 245 00 211000 325 00 200 00 250 00 200 00 450 00 450 00 386 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00
runoff coeffICient 021 011 013 009 011 009 017 017 037 012 012 009 023
dlSSOlvedlto1alP 054 057 051 061 057 061 040 040 037 010 010 061 040
PONOSlZE Model fOI McKuslCk Lake
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998 check cheek cheek cheek cheek
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2
case label SO-206 SO-203 SO-204 SO-205 SO-201 SO-202 SO-207 SO.1 SO-2 SO-3 SO-4 SO.8 SO.9
watershed area acres 224 205 55 39 50 48 152 6 22 197 342 61 247 197
baslll area acres 0001 5 15 13 1 1 0001 065 0001 0001 0001 073 041
baSin volume eere-ft 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001
% agncuhuralland 0 100 100 0 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Industnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
"4 multi family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% slIlgle fanuly res 50 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 50 50 50 50 25
% open area 50 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 50 50 50 75
upstream p load Ibsfyr 2028 000 000 1811 000 000 273 39 000 000 1501 2367 000 628
upstream outflow ee-ftlyr 2402 000 000 1485 000 000 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibsfyr 2595 6764 1811 3590 1644 1578 290 16 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
outflow p cone ppb 31328 449 61 448 62 448 99 448 06 44804 328n 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26
P removalefhclency % 011 009 031 007 044 044 001 017 062 017 016 009 010
v1awmo pond volume acre-ft 060 513 138 135 125 120 286 076 053 091 016 066 045
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pr8ClpltatlOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 325 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 262 50,
runoff ortho pftotal P 051 010 010 040 010 010 061 040 051 051 051 051 056
unit runoff InIyr 346 324 324 448 324 324 243 448 346 346 346 346 294!
Unit export Ibslac-y 025 033 033 046 033 033 011 046 025 025 025 025 017
POND WATER BUDGETS 4631
runoff ac-ftIyr 645 5535 1485 1457 1350 1296 3090 822 567 985 176 711
upstream pond ac-ftlyr 2402 000 000 1485 000 000 295 79 000 000 1389 2374 000 711
totalll1flow ac-ftlyr 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296 326 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
outflow ac.ftlyr 3048 5535 1485 2942 1350 1296 328 69 822 567 2374 2550 711 1195
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibllyr 570 6770 1816 1782 1851 1585 1680 1005 501 870 155 628 345
upstream pond IbsIyr 2028 000 000 1811 000 000 273 39 000 000 1501 2367 000 628
tota' Inflow Ibslyr 2598 6770 1816 3592 1651 1585 290 18 1005 501 2372 2523 628 973
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr 003 006 006 003 007 007 003 002 003 004 004 001 001
outflow Ibllyr 2595 6764 1811 3590 1644 1578 290 16 1003 498 2367 2519 628 972
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 000 000 000 000 000 100 000 100 100 100 000 000
relattve volume lIlChas 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 002 000 001
residence tIme years 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
residence time days 001 001 002 001 003 003 000 004 006 002 001 005 003
overflow rate ftlyr 30476 03 1107 990 2263 1350 1296 328691 70 1264 5673 60 2374020 25497 00 974 2913
lIlflow phos cone ppb 31363 450 02 450 02 449 32 450 02 450 02 326 80 450 02 325 02 367 53 364 02 325 02 299 56
outflow phos cone ppb 31328 449 61 448 62 448 99 448 06 44804 328n 449 25 322 99 366 91 363 45 324 72 299 26
P reactlOll rate 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 000 000 000 000
1-1)) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 099 100 100 100 100
lAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 325 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 450 00 200 00 450 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 325 00 262 50
runoff coefflCl8I1l 013 012 012 017 012 012 009 017 013 013 013 013 011
dlssolYedltolal P 051 010 010 040 010 010 061 040 051 051 051 051 056
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslck Lake Receives outflow from DiverSion to
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R Long Lake to
Brasch November 1998 (Link 1 on SO HCD) check McKuslck McKuslCk Lake DIStrICt
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 Lake Lily Lake (Lake Vol From SHE D/FS study
ca$lllabel SD-5 SO 301 SO-302 SD-303 S0-3032 Reach 303 SO-304 SO-305 50-306 ML-l ML-80 ML-2 ML-3
watershed area acres 80 5 24 92 23 0001 269 1081 124 498 580 18 2
basin area acres 0001 01 1 0001 0001 0001 0001 35 0001 29 52 0001 0001
basin volume acre-It 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 0001 87 744 0001 0001
." agncutturalland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% Induslnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0
% mulll family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 12 0 0
% single lamlly res 25 0 50 50 25 0 26 47 63 100 45 0 50
% open area 75 100 50 50 75 100 75 35 37 0 21 100 50
upstream p load lbsIyr 503 40 000 000 000 000 935 000 1401 854 09 000 000 000 017
upstream outflow ac-lIIyr 2209 83 000 000 000 000 11 14 000 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibslyr 513 89 055 610 231 039 932 469 5004 89147 908 3294 017 086
0lI111ow volume ac-lIIyr 2224 35 101 891 265 056 11 14 660 5431 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
outflow p conc ppb 8500 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 307 96 261 48 338 99 12406 179 52 8783 190 91 268 28
P removal effICIency % 000 034 007 130 400 025 039 002 000 6011 7661 455 306
v1awmo pond volume acre-fI 136 009 064 025 005 000 061 339 356 172 2757 003 005
I
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS i
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 I
season preclpllallOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff tolal p ppb 262 50 200 00 325 00 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50 362 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00
runoff or1ho pIIotal p 056 061 051 051 056 061 056 047 048 040 044 061 051
unll'llnoff Inlyr 294 243 346 346 294 243 294 406 372 448 616 243 346
unll export Ibs/ac y 017 011 025 025 017 011 017 033 030 046 052 011 025
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftIyr 1472 101 691 265 056 000 660 3658 3847 1860 297 80 032 058
upslream pond ac-lIIyr 2209 63 000 000 000 000 11 14 000 1774 2605 35 000 000 000 032
total Inflow ac-ftIyr 2224 35 101 691 265 056 1114 660 54 31 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
outflow ac-lIIyr 2224 35 101 691 265 056 1114 660 54 31 2643 82 1860 297 80 032 090
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff lbsIyr 1050 055 611 234 040 000 471 3604 3738 2275 303 95 018 051
upstream pond Ibslyr 503 40 000 000 000 000 935 000 1401 854 09 000 000 000 017
total Inflow IbsIyr 513 90 055 611 234 040 935 471 5005 89147 2275 303 95 018 068
nel sedlmentallOn IbBlyr 000 000 000 003 002 002 002 001 000 1368 232 87 001 002
outflow Ibslyr 513 89 055 610 231 039 932 469 5004 89147 908 7109 017 066
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feel 100 001 000 100 100 100 100 000 100 300 1431 100 100
relaWe volume Inches 000 003 000 001 005 13333 000 000 000 1263 6745 008 005
residence time years 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 047 250 000 000
residence time days 000 036 005 014 065 003 006 001 000 17072 91188 113 041
ovel1low rale IIIyr 2224348 08 1013 691 2649 60 564 08 1113838 6597 23 1552 2843820 07 641 573 324 00 900 00
mflow phos conc ppb 8500 20001 325 02 325 02 262 51 308 74 262 51 339 06 12406 450 02 375 52 200 01 27674
outflow phos cone ppb 8500 199 33 324 79 320 78 252 02 307 96 26148 338 99 12406 179 52 8783 19091 268 28
P raacllOll rata 000 000 000 001 004 000 000 000 000 378 1401 005 003
l-rp 100 100 100 099 096 100 100 100 100 040 023 095 097
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 262 50 200 00 32500 325 00 262 50 200 00 262 50 362 50 357 50 450 00 375 50 200 00 325 00
runoff coafflC18nt 011 009 013 013 011 009 011 015 014 017 023 009 013
dIssolvedltotal P 056 061 051 051 056 061 056 047 048 040 044 061 051
PONDSlZE Model for McKU$lCk Lake
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch, November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS ,
cese label ML-4 ML-5 ML-6 ML-7 ML-8 ML-20 ML-21 ML-22 ML-23 ML-24 ML-25 SUBC-26 ML.27
watershed area acres 108 63 68 10 461 96 52 29 93 37 16 8 132
basm area acres 0001 16 008 001 15 164 001 01 037 001 048 001 132
basin volume acre-It 0001 32 008 0001 45 32 0001 01 037 0001 048 0001 66
% agllculturat land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% ll1duatllal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% multi family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% smgle faRIIIy res 100 100 50 100 100 50 0 50 100 75 50 50 66
% openllr" 0 0 50 0 0 50 100 50 0 25 50 50 34
upstream p load Ibslyr 3294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057 097 000 125 000 5199
upstream outflow ac-ftlyr 297 60 000 000 000 374 000 000 105 189 000 122 000 328 15
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load Ibslyr 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097 336 125 107 201 4047
outflow volume ac-ftlyr 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 332 31
oulfIowpconc ppb 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 188 83 17641 19760 18995 230 47 376 93 233 95 320 85 4480
P removal effICIency % 000 5545 2768 147 5793 4572 120 2521 3570 273 3550 128 2789
vlawmo pond volume acre-ft 037 022 018 035 159 026 010 008 032 011 004 021 039
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season prectptlatlOn Inches 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runoff total p ppb 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00 450 00 387 50 325 00 325 00 365 00
runoff ortho P'folal p 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051 040 045 051 051 047
UllIt runoff InIyr 448 448 346 448 448 346 243 346 448 397 346 346 378
unlt export lbsIac-y 046 046 025 046 046 025 011 025 046 035 025 025 031
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff ac-ftlyr 403 235 196 374 1722 276 105 064 347 122 046 230 416
upstream pond acftlyr 297 80 000 000 000 374 000 000 105 189 000 122 000 32815
total Inflow ac-ftIyr 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 332 31
outflow ac-ftlyr 301 83 235 196 374 2095 276 105 189 536 122 168 230 33231
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff IbsIyr 493 288 173 457 2106 244 057 074 425 129 041 204 413
upstream pond Ibslyr ~294 000 000 000 450 000 000 057 097 000 125 000 5199
total Inflow IbsIyr 3788 288 173 457 25&6 244 057 130 522 129 166 204 5612
net sedimentatIOn Ibslyr 000 160 048 007 1481 112 001 033 186 004 059 003 1565
outflow Ibslyr 3788 128 125 450 1075 133 057 097 336 125 107 201 4047
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean dapfh feet 100 200 100 010 300 195 010 100 100 010 100 010 500
relallve volume Inches 001 3672 110 001 706 3125 003 323 288 002 2813 001 428 08
residence time years 000 136 004 000 021 116 000 005 007 000 028 000 020
residence time days 000 496 38 1491 010 7839 422 45 035 1933 2519 030 104 00 016 7249
ovedlow rate ft/yr 301834 80 147 2448 373 50 1397 169 10530 1888 1449 12238 351 230 40 2518
Il1flow phos conc ppb 4617 450 02 325 02 450 02 44885 325 02 200 01 253 96 358 44 387 52 362 73 325 02 6213
outflow phos cone ppb 4617 200 48 235 05 443 42 18883 17641 19760 18995 230 47 376 93 233 95 320 85 4480
P reachon rate 000 279 053 002 327 155 001 045 086 003 085 001 054
l.rp 100 045 072 099 042 054 099 075 064 097 064 099 072
LAND USE PARAMETERS ,
runoff total P calc ppb 450 00 450 00 325 00 450 00 450 00 325 00 200 00 325 00 450 00 387 50 325 00 325 00 365 op
runoff coefficient 017 017 013 017 017 013 009 013 017 015 013 013 0111
dlSSOlvedltotel P 040 040 051 040 040 051 061 051 040 045 051 051 04;7
I
I
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PONDSIZE Model for McKuslCk lake Dlv Inflow
W Walker July 1987. adapted by R McKu$lck McKuslck McKuSICk
Brasch. November 1998 landlocked Wetland Wetland lake
INPUT VARIABLES UNITS Landlocked above 852 below 852 ML-47
case label Ml-40 Ml-41 Ml-42 Ml-43 Ml-44 Ml-31 Ml-30 SUBC-45 SUBC-46 SUBC 63
watershed area acres 22 44 09 4 28 227 12 715 99 63 0001 0001 0001
basm area acres 036 01 02 015 028 0001 028 0001 0001 0001 24 173 46
basm volume acre-It 038 01 02 015 028 0001 05 0001 0001 0001 10 7 205
% agrICultural land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IRduslnal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% multi family res 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 10 0 0 0
% smgfe fanuly res 25 50 50 60 50 fO 15 100 84 60 0 0 80
% open area 75 50 50 40 50 90 85 0 0 30 100 100 20
upstream p load Ibsfyr 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1035 92
upstream outflow ac-ftIyr 000 054 181 207 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 3067 24
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow p load Ibsfyr 027 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781 2153 000 000 71874
outflow volume ac-ftIyr 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 000 000 3067 25
ouUlow P conc ppb 185 73 206 66 16533 177 98 214 90 224 06 15736 448 97 449 30 374 22 17359 174 18 8621
P removal effICiency % 2925 2709 2536 2391 3388 042 3375 023 016 021 1321 1292 3062
vtawmo pond volume acre-It 005 012 002 011 007 048 025 247 363 196 000 000 000
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
season pr8CIpllallon lnehes 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700 2700
runolf total p ppb 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 225 00 237 50 450 00 450 00 375 00 200 00 200 00 400 00
runoff ortho p'lolal P 058 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040 046 061 061 044
unllrunoff mIyr 294 346 346 386 346 264 274 448 475 403 243 243 407
unll export Ibslac-y 017 025 025 029 025 013 015 046 048 034 011 011 037
POND WATER BUDGETS
runofl ac-ftlyr 054 127 026 122 081 498 274 2671 3915 2116 000 000 000
upstream pond ac-ltlyr 000 054 161 207 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 306724
tolal mflow ac-ftIyr 054 1 81 207 329 081 498 274 2671 '3915 2116 000 000 3067 25
ouUlow ac-ftlyr 054 181 207 329 081 498 274 2871 3915 2116 000 000 3067 25
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff Ibslyr 038 112 023 116 071 305 177 3266 4789 2157 000 000 000
upstream pond IbsIyr 000 027 101 093 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1035 92
lotalll1flow bslyr 038 139 124 209 071 305 177 3266 4789 2157 000 000 1035 92
net sedimentatIOn IbsIyr o tl 038 032 050 024 001 060 008 008 005 000 000 317 19
outflow Ibslyr 027 101 093 159 047 304 117 3259 4781 2153 000 000 71874
HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS
pond mean depth feet 100 100 100 100 100 100 179 100 100 100 042 040 446
relawe volume Inches 1802 213 2083 332 938 001 493 000 000 000 1333333 33 933333 33 1631299735
rasldence lime years 067 006 010 005 035 000 018 000 000 000 49382 72 34567 90 007
residence lime days 243 54 2020 3533 1668 12674 007 6666 001 001 002 1802469136 1261728395 2439
oveJ1Jow rate ftlyr 150 1807 1033 2191 288 4984 92 978 26705 25 39150 54 2116328 000 000 6668
tnfIow phos cone ppb 262 51 283 42 221 51 233 91 325 02 225 01 237 51 450 02 450 02 375 02 200 01 200 01 12426
outflow phos conc ppb 185 73 206 66 16533 177 98 21490 224 06 157 36 448 97 449 30 374 22 173 59 17418 8621
P reactJon rate 058 051 046 041 078 000 077 000 000 000 018 017 064
1-rp 071 073 075 076 066 100 066 100 100 100 087 087 069
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb 262 50 325 00 325 00 350 00 325 00 225 00 237 50 450 00 450 00 375 00 200 00 200 00 400 00
runoff coeffICient 011 013 013 014 013 010 010 017 018 015 009 009 015
dtasolvedltotalP 056 051 051 048 051 059 058 040 040 046 061 061 044
PONOSIZE Model for McKuSlCk lake
W Walker July 1987, adapted by R
Brasch November 1998
INPUT VARIABLES
case label
watershed area
basm area
basm volume
% agncultural land
% mdustnal
% multi family res
% Single fallllly res
% open area
upstream p load
upstream outflow
OUTPUT VARIABLES
outflow P load
outflow IIOlume
outftow p cone
p r8fllOllll1 effiCiency
vtawmo pond volume
ASSUMED EXPORT FACTORS
season length yrs
saa80ll preclpllatlon InChes
runoff total p ppb
runoff oltho p/'lotal p
und runoff
unllllllpDn
POND WATER BUDGETS
runoff
upstream pond
total Inflow
outflow
POND PHOSPHORUS BUDGETS
runoff lbsIyr
\4lSlream pond IbsIyr
total Inflow Ibslyr
net sedimentatIOn Ibslyr
outflow Ib5Iyr
HYDRAULIC PARAMETER':!
pond mean depth feet
relaWe volume Inches
ra~~ebme years
resldencel1me days
overflow rate ftIyr
mflow phos conc ppb
outflow phos conc ppb
P reacllon rale
1-rp
LAND USE PARAMETERS
runoff total P calc ppb
runoff coeffICient
dIsso\VedI1otal P
-
-
UNITS
acres
acres
acre-ft
Ibslyr
ac-fllyr
bsIyr
ac-ftIyr
ppb
%
acre-lt
m/yr
lIls/ac-y
ac-fllyr
ac-flIyr
ac-fllyr
ac ftIyr
-
AnalYSIS McKuslCk Lake DiversIOn Impact (1996 WILMS Input)
ScenarIO loadings to McKuslCk L ,wI dlllerslon,
(NWL for lake IS 853, no NURP pondmg for SO-20t-205, 305)
Date 1-11-99 (Includes field checked pond data)
Summary Stats
M L watershed (existing condtllOns, pre-diverSIOn)
Direct 234
Indirect 673
Total 907 wsllake area ratIO
Water araa 67
GRAND TOTAL 974
M L watershed (post-<llllerslon)
Direct
Indirect
Total
Water area
GRAND TOTAL
234
3,583
3,817
394
4,211
wsllake area ratIO
Agncultural
IndustrlaVcommerclal
Multdamlly
% single family res
'l'o open area
P-COEFF RUNOFF COEFF
450 0 12
350 0 488
450 0 227
450 0166
200 0 09
Notes CalibratIOn run for WILMS under 1996 condlllOn&,
Actual wq for Lily Lake outflow, precrp Is for 1996 water year
Assum8$ McK Lake NWL 18 853 and that dlvened water
does not pass through nonh wetland, no NURP onds
for 50-201-205, 305
Key for pond InformatIOn numencalscnpts
1 - Both wet volume and area from HydroCad Input
2 - Pond area only from HydroCad Input (generally shows no wet volume)
3 - Wet volume only from HydroCad Input
4 - Pond area from 200 scale topo maps
5 - Wet IIOlume from field check
6 - Wet IIOlume from as-bullts
7 - Pond area, wet volume from OPH SWMP
8 - Volume, depth assumed
9 - Volume from E Peters (estimated)
field checked ponds checked In January, 1999
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20
78
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
t.....,....., '4"""
'11'/19
Report for
Market Place Surfa1ce Water
Management Study
Stillwater, Minnes,ota
Marck 31, 1~~'
File No. 510-~8-184
.11. Bones-treo
..ILJI RoseAe
ii Ancderlik &
1 \11 AS5eQiat!es
Engineers & Architects
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
-
1\11
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Bonestroo Rosene Anderllk and AssoCIates Inc IS an Afftrmatlve Action/Equal Opportuntty Employer
PrinCipals Otto G Bonestroo PE . Joseph C Anderllk PE . MarvIn l Sorvala PE .
Richard E Turner PE . Glenn R Cook PE . Robert G Schunrcht PE . Jerry A Bourdon PE .
Robert W Rosene PE and Susan M Eberlin CPA Senror Consultants
AssoCIate Principals Howard A Sanford PE . KeIth A Gordon PE . Robert R Pfefferle PE .
Richard W Foster PE . David 0 loskota PE . Robert C Russek A I A . Mark A Hanson PE .
Michael TRautmann PE . Ted K FIeld PE . Kenneth P Anderson PE . Mark R Rolfs PE .
Sidney P WIlliamson PE l S . Robert F Kotsmlth . Agnes M Ring' MIchael P Rau PE .
Allan RIck SchmIdt PE
Offices St Paul Rochester Wlllmar and St Cloud MN. Milwaukee WI
Engineers & Architects
Webslte wwwbonestroo com
March 31, 1999
City of Stillwater
216 N. 4th Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
Re, Market Place Surface Water Management Study
File No. 510-98-804
Dear Mayor and Council.
Enclosed is our report for the Market Place Surface Water Management Study This report gives
the City a comprehensIve report on the existing surface water system within the Market Place
Area and identifies opportunItIes for unproved rate control aud water qualIty protection within
the study area. The implementation of the improvements will result in a SIgnificant improvement
m the management of surface water within Market Place.
We will be pleased to discuss this report further with the CouncIl or City Staff at a mutually
convenient tIme.
Respectfully subnntted,
BaC;;~ERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Erik G. Peters
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and mat I
am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws
of the S Ie of . es
Date March 31. 1999
Reg. No 14260
2335 West Highway 36 · St Paul, MN 55113 · 651-636-4600 · Fax: 651-636-1311
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
Letter of TransIDltta1
Table of Contents
ExecutIve Summary
Introduction
Study Scope and Methodology
Market Place North Drainage DIStr.lct
Market Place South Drainage DIStrIct
Summary
RecommendatIons
Appendix - FIgure 1
FIgure 2
FIgure 3
Table 1
Table 2a & 2b
Table 3a, & 3b
Map 1
Page No
1
2.
3
5
6
9
13
18
20
_Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
2
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Executive Summary
A surface water management study of the Market Place Area was requested by the CIty CouncIl
to address concerns regarding the management of storm water runoff in the Market Place Area,
which drams, mto Long Lake The pnmary concerns WIthm the Market Place Area were the
followmg
1. The existmg surface water system has been pieced together over the past 20 years Without
a comprehensive plan
2 A large portion of the system was deSIgned when water quality protection for
downstream water bodies was not a significant issue.
3 High runoff rates leavmg the eXisting 62nd Street Pond that impact the design of the 62nd
Street Area storm water system
The Market Place Surface Water Management Study is a comprehensIve report on the eXistIng
surface water system Within the Market Place Area addressmg both water quantity control and
water quality protectIon issues. Opportumties to Improve runoff rate control, water qualIty
protectIOn and flood protectIon are Identified in thIS report The rmplementatIon of the
improvements will result in a sIgmficant improvement m the management of surface water
WIthm the Market Place Area and protection of Long Lake
Some of the benefits and Improvements to the management of water resources Within the City of
Stillwater resulting from the ImplementatIon of the improvement options are listed below
1. The 1 DO-year peak discharge from the Market Place Pond may be reduced by 46% over
existIng conditions.
2 The modeled phosphorus loadmg mto Long Lake will be reduced by up to 9%.
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3, The SIze of the outlet pipe for the 62nd Street pond needed to fully contam the 100-year
flow may be reduced to a 48" pipe A sigmficant reductIon in pIpe size and cost saVIngs
over earlier estunates.
In the following pages, an analysis of the eXIsting surface water system and recommendations for
improvements are presented In detail.
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Computer modeling of stormwater runoff quality and pollutant (phosphorus) removal efficIency
for ponds was carried out using the computer software PondNET. PondNET is an empmcal
model that was developed from data collected as part of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EP A) National Urban Runoff Program (NURP). The use of the model was lImIted to the
analYSIS of relatIve removal effiCIencIes in a detentIon pond. Sufficient data to calIbrate the water
qualIty model IS presently unaVailable to permit accurate predictions of inflow and outflow
concentratIons. While the water quality modelmg focused on phosphorus removal in partIcular,
total suspended SOlis removal effiCIencIes can be estImated to be 10% - 15% higher when
compared to phosphorus removal Phosphorus IS often the lImItIng nutrient for bIological growth
m lakes and streams. Therefore, phosphorus the often the evaluated as the most critical pollutant
for the protection of downstream water bodies
The typICal pond deSIgn cnteria for phosphorus removal IS 60 % removal Some communities
will pnoritIze waterbodies based on public value and sUSCeptibIlIty to pollutant loadIng. The
waterbodIes given lugh pnonty status Will be given additIonal protection by ralsmg the deSIgn
standard for upstream ponds constructed With development The practIcal design limit for water
qualIty ponds is 70 - 75% removal of phosphorus. The upper hmit in removal efficiency by a
wet pond is due two factors.
1. The long time which fme partIcles Will remain suspended in the water column.
2 The dIstributIon of phosphorus between dIssolved and particulate components Ponds
are most effectIve at remOVIng partIculate phosphorus
WIthin the Market Place Area are two maJor storm sewer systems The dramage diVIde between
the two major storm sewer systems is essentially West Orleans Street, dividIng the study area
WIthm Stillwater mto a North Drainage DIstrict and a South DraInage Distnct The North
DIstnCt IS made of dramage sub-dIStnCtS Upper and Lower Highlands, Cottages, and Wildwood
PInes East and West and Autumn Woods The North DIStriCt drains to 62nd Street pond through
a 36" diameter storm sewer pipe along StIllwater Boulevard (CSAH 5). The South District IS
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
made up of dramage sub-dIstricts Clinic SIte, Washmgton East and West, Tower Drive, St. CroIx
Sports, Market Drive, Market Place and 62nd Street. The South District drams to the Market
Place pond prior to tlowmg into the 62nd Street Pond (see Map 1). Runoff from Oak Park
Heights and Trunk Highway 36 drains into the Market Place Pond of the South District.
The drainage sub-dIstrICts were defined based on 2' tOpOgraphIC contours and the CIty'S storm
sewer system. The sub-dtstricts have the same name as the pondmg basm to wluch they dram
SIgnificant areas where overland drainage direct dIffers from and/or may bypass the underlying
storm sewer system are identified within each sub-district as shown on Map 1
Land use withm the City of Stillwater was analyzed usmg GeographIc Information System (GIS)
to determine the amount of impervious coverage within each sub-dIstrIct. The amount of
ImpervIOUS area Within each basin was used to estImate runoff curve numbers and runoff
volumes for each sub-distrIct. Table 1 contains a summary of the total area and the imperVIOUS
coverage (existIng and estimated ultImate development) for each sub-district
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Market Place North Drainage District
The North DIStnct of the study area IS fully developed and mcludes 274 acres Every sub-distnct
but Wildwood Pmes East and Autumn Woods drains into the Woodland PInes Pond The entire
DIStnct drains through a 36" storm sewer pipe to 62nd Street Pond The Woodland Pmes East
and Autumn Woods sub-districts drain mto the 36" pipe downstream of the outlet of Woodland
Pmes Pond. Durmg large storm events backwater effects m the 36" pIpe will cause the hIgh
water level (HWL) of Woodland Pines Pond to equalize With the piped storm water flow from
Woodland Pmes East and Autumn Woods For water qualIty modelmg purposes where the
frequent but small storm events carry the maJonty of the pollutants, the dramage from Woodland
Pines East and Autumn Woods was assumed to completely bypass the Woodland Hills Pond
An analysIs of the existing situation withm the North Distnct Identified two Issues
1 The primary issue is floodmg potential for one resIdence adjacent of the Woodland Pmes
Pond,
2. The second ISSue was sIgmficant pond bounce for the HIghlands Pond The issues are
discussed m more detail below Table 2a and 3a list the water quantity and quality data
for each detention pond Within the study area
Woodland Pines Pond: The walkout basement of one resIdence adjacent to Woodland Pines
Pond IS near or at the modeled 100-year HWL for the pond (914' see Table 2a) based on
avmlable 2' contour data The other residences appear to be above 916'. Three options are
avmlable for the City to increase the amount of flood protectIon for the one house.
1. The fIrst optIon is ehmmate the walkout on the house and bring in fill to raise the
backyard drammg to the pond.
Stillwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2. The second optIon is to mcrease the available dry storage volume by expanding the pond.
Tlus optIon will require a significant area of land and excavation to drop the HWL 0.5
feet The area equivalent to the SIze of the soccer field adjacent to the pond and
StIllwater Boulevard would be converted into ponding
3. The third option to mcrease the amount of upstream rate control. Upstream rate control
would be much more cost effectIve at lowenng the HWL of Woodland Pmes Pond
compared to optIon 2. Upstream rate control IS physically aVaIlable withIn HIghland
Hills 1 sub-dtstnct TIns optIon is dtscussed further In the section below discussmg
improvements to drainage Within the HIghlands sub-distncts
The most cost-effectIve optIon to provIde flood protectIOn for the one residence IS OptIon 1
However, Option 3 is the most effective optIon to improve the overall management of surface
water within the North District.
Currently the upstream watershed mto the Woodland Pines Pond has lIttle in the way of water
quality protectIon measures (see Table 3a). A significant portion of the western portion of
Wlldwood Pines sub-dtstrict drains dIrectly Into WIldwood Pines Pond. Constructing a water
quality pond between the 48" storm sewer outlet and WIldwood Pines Pond IS not an available
optIon due to space constraints OptIon 3 will reduce the phosphorus loadmg into WIldwood
Pines Pond as dtscussed below. Constructing a water qualIty basin to capture runoff from the
northern portion of Wildwood Pines sub-district at the downstream end of the 30" storm sewer IS
an option This optIon was not evaluated at this tIme due to a pnonty on water qualIty
improvements that Will sIgmficantly mcrease the protection for Long Lake.
Highlands Pond: The Highlands Pond is a dry pond basm (has no permanent pool of standing
water) Within a reSIdentIal area. The pond expenences SIgnificant fluctuatIon in pond water
levels during storm events. The water levels within the pond will fluctuate 12' dunng a 100-year
storm event. The 100-year HWL of the pond is 943.5'. The lowest walkout elevatIon is
approximately 946' (see Table 2a)
10
StIllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The outlet of the pond (a 21" flared end sectIon) IS a maIntenance concern due to potentIal for
pluggmg from debns At the tIme of thIs report the bottom of the basIn was well vegetated With
turf grass With a small channel connectIng the 48" storm sewer mlet With the 21" outlet. The
sods at the bottom of the basm are very sandy. The adJacent residents have recently cleaned out
the channel and work to keep the pond outlet clear of debns. ReSIdents reported that the water
level of the pond had nsen close to what would be the 1 DO-year HWL when comparmg the
locatIon of the HWL pomted out by reSIdents With the aV31lable 2- foot contour data Whether a
1 DO-year storm event actually occurred or the outlet became partIally plugged was not
determIned.
To Improve the behaVIor of the Woodland PInes and HIghlands Pond VIa upstream rate control,
the only SIgnIficant opportunIty lIes WIthIn the Upper Highlands sub-distrIct Two optlons are
avadable and both optIons would Involve SIgnIficant modIfications to the eXIstIng surface water
management system WIthm the North DIStrICt.
1 The fIrst optIon IS to construct a pond WIthm Benson Park and route the eXIstIng 36"
storm sewer from Benson Boulevard West mto the new pond. The outlet of the pond
would flow back mto the eXIstIng 36" storm sewer at LydIa CIrcle Cul-de-sac. The pond
would take up a SIgnIficant portIon of the park (approxImately 1.4 acres assumIng gradual
SIde slopes and wet storage for water qualIty protectIon). The loss of parkland and lIkely
concerns of reSIdents adJacent to the portIon of the park where the pond would be located
weIgh heaVIly agaInst thIs optIon
2 The second optIon IS to divert dramage from the Highland Hills sub-distrIct south to the
Clm1c SIte Pond as shown on FIgure 1. The ClinIc SIte Pond would need to be expanded
under this optIon and a 36"/42" pIpe would divert runoff away from the downstream
system begInnIng at the Lydia Crrcle Cul-de-sac. The Implementation of this option
would result m the followmg Improvements to the surface water system WIthm the North
DIStrICt summanzed on Table 2b & 3b.
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a Rate control can be provIded wIthm the HIghlands Pond wlule lowermg
the 1 DO-year HWL of the pondmg basm 3 5 feet. An emergency overflow
may be mstalled at the new 100-year HWL WIth the outlet modificatIons
(48" drop mlet structure).
b. The rate control provIded upstream Within the Highland Hdls would
permIt more effective use of the Cottages Pond for rate control A two-
stage outlet can be placed m front of the eXIstIng 36" culvert
c The 100-year HWL of Woodland Pmes Pond would drop 1 foot to 913'.
d The total phosphorus loadmg mto the Woodland Pmes Pond would drop
16%.
The diversion of drainage from the Upper HIghlands sub-dIstnct away from Woodland Pmes
Pond would not mcrease the total nutnent loadmg mto Long Lake. WIth the expanSIon of the
ClImc SIte Pond the total phosphorus removed from the watershed as modeled at 62nd Street
Pond would be essentIally the same as a scenarIO Without the dramage diverSIon. WhIle the
diverSIon would reduce the pollutant loadIng to Woodland Pmes Pond, the diverSIOn alone
Will not sIgmficantly reduce the loading mto Long Lake compared to the domg nothmg The
most effective opportunItIes to reduce the pollutant loadIng mto Long Lake lIe Within the
South DIStnCt.
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Market Place South Drainage District
The South DIstrIct of the study area IS over 90% developed and mcludes 226 acres.
ApproxImately 295 acres from Oak Park HeIghts and Trunk HIghway 36 dram mto the Market
Place Pond Within the South Distnct The most sIgnificant opportunities to reduce runoff rates
and pollutant loading to Long Lake he Within the South DIstnCt
An analysis of the eXIsting situation within the South District identified the Tower Drive and
W ashmgton Avenue ponds where the most significant modifications could be made to improve
the overall surface water management within the Market Place Area of Stillwater. These ponds
are under utihzed for water quahty protectIon and rate control The Improvements would
sIgnificantly Increase the effectiveness of rate control and water quality protection Improvements
planned for the 62nd Street Pond and ultimately Long Lake as part of the Curve Crest Boulevard
Extension The issues are dIscussed In more detail below
Efforts to Improve the water qualIty protectIon benefits of the existing ponds within StIllwater
become less cost effectIve the further downstream one looks Within the watershed due to ponded
flow from upstream ponds miXIng With dIrect runoff entering a downstream pond, It is much
more difficult to effectively remove pollutants from mixed runoff due to fluslung effects from
the upstream watershed that has already passed through water qualIty Improvement ponds. The
reSIdence tIme of water within a pond IS Important to achieve sedimentatIon and allow for
bIOlogICal uptake of nutnents between storm events.
Table 2a and 3a hsts the water quantIty and qUalIty data for each detention pond Within the study
area. In Table 3a, ponds that are downstream of other ponds will have reduced pollutant removal
efficiency (modeled specifically for the nutrient phosphorus) asSOCIated with that pond than for
the overall watershed draining Into the pond (assuming the upstream ponds are adequately
deSIgned to include water qualIty protection benefits).
Stillwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tower Drive Pond: The Tower Dnve Pond is under utIlized for water quality protectIon and
rate control (see Table 2a & 3a) The pond basm IS a dry pond. Accumulated debris has
partially plugged the storm sewer inlets drainmg into and out of the pond It is recommended
that the pond be enlarged and a rate control restriction placed on the outlet to lower the peak
dIscharges from the pond and provides water qualIty protectIon (see FIgure 2 and Tables 2b &
3b) The current outlet locatIon of the pond IS recommended to be shifted further west to lImit
short circuiting WItlun the pond SInce the eXistIng storm sewer Inputs and outputs are close
together an the majority of the pond lies to the west
An additIonal recommendatIon is to mcrease the dramage area to this pond by routIng as much as
possIble the drainage from WashIngton West sub-district to the Tower Drive Pond A portIon of
thIS sub-dIstnct IS undeveloped and may be graded to dram to the pond The addition of storm
sewer and catch basins along the western half of Washington Avenue will be needed to direct the
remaIning portion of the Washington West sub-dIstnct to the pond. Cover constraints and
minImum velOCIty constramts WllIIImIt the sIZe and capacIty of the required pipe.
Clinic Site Pond: ThIs pond IS proposed to be expanded should drainage from the Upper
HIghlands sub-district be diverted into the Clinic Pond as discussed previously In the North
DIStrict section of this report (see FIgure 1) The expansion will improve the water quality
benefits of the pond and maintain the existIng HWL and peak discharge (compare Tables 2a &
2b and 3a & 3b). The water quality benefits of the pond may be further improved If the pond
was configured Into a two-cell pond with storm sewer Input dIrected into the 18t (upstream) pond
cell.
Washington Avenue Pond: ThIS pond is very shallow and currently provIdes marginal water
quality protectIon to the downstream surface water system (see Table 3a). The pond is also
under SIZed m relation to ltS watershed to provide sigmficant rate control (see Table 2a).
Enlargmg thIS pond and deepenIng the pond (see Figure 3) Will allow significant rate control and
water qualIty benefits to be obtained from this pond (compare Tables 2a & 3a With Tables 2b and
3b), A two-cell pond IS recommended to denve the maxImum water quality Improvement
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
possIble from thIS pond In addItion the Improvements WIll benefit and Improve the downstream
surface water system as explaIned below
Market Drive Pond: The aVailable dry storage volume for rate control may be further utihzed
than currently eXIstIng The recommended outlet of tills pond IS a two-stage outlet to prOVIded
Increased rate control, partIcularly for smaller storm events Due to the small SIze of the pond,
sIgmficantly IncreasIng the wet volume of the pond for water quahty purposes IS not an aVailable
optIon
Market Place Pond: Once the upstream pondIng Improvements are Implemented as
recommended, particularly for the WashIngton Avenue Pond, sIgmficant Improvements m rate
control may be made for the Market Place Pond The addItIonal rate control wdl help Improve
the overall rate control efforts proposed for the 62nd Street Pond as discussed below and to a
lesser extent help the management of water levels for Long Lake
The current outlet of Market Place pond IS a 36" and 48" pIpe WIth upstream rate control, the
36" outlet may be abandoned and an outlet restnctIon placed on the 48" pIpe outlet. The total
Improvements wIll result m a 50% reductIon m the peak dIscharge leaVIng the pond whIle
maIntaming the eXIstIng 100-year HWL (see Table 2b, option 1).
62nd Street Pond: The 62nd Street pond IS the downstream pond for the entIre study area Flow
leaVIng the 62nd Street pond draIns dIrectly Into Long Lake The existmg outlet IS an overland
channel to Long Lake The lower portIon of the overland channel near Long Lake IS an erodIng
gully workIng ItS way upstream from Long Lake The upper portIon near the pond IS lmed WIth
cable concrete and IS shOWIng SIgn of stress due to exceSSIve overland flows and damage due to
freeze/thaw cycles.
Most of the dIrect watershed to 62nd Street IS undeveloped. When thIs area develops, local water
qUalIty ponds are recommended over USIng the 62nd Street Pond as a water quahty pond for local
runoff. Pollutant removal from the dIrect watershed WIll be more effectIve usmg local ponds for
reasons dIscussed above.
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
With the extensIOn of Curve Crest Boulevard west of Stillwater Boulevard (CSAH 5)
improvements will be made to the 62nd Street Pond Outlet optIons for the improved 62nd Street
Pond was discussed m the Report for Curve Crest Boulevard Extension Street and Utility
Improvements completed m January 1999. A result of this Market Place Surface Water
Management Study has been a better understandmg of the surface water system upstream of the
62nd Street Pond. Therefore, the outlet optIons for the 62nd Street Pond have been revised
accordmgly and are listed m Table 2b
If all of the upstream rate control Improvements are Implemented Within the South District, a 48"
dIameter pIpe IS adequate to fully contam the 1 DO-year peak flow from the 62nd Street Pond (see
Table 2b - 62nd Street Pond - optIon 1a) The peak flow from 62nd Street Pond into Long Lake
would be reduced by 46%
The redUCIng the outlet to a 42" pIpe (see Table 2b - 62nd Street Pond - optIon 1b) was evaluated
based on upstream rate control However, the recommended outlet pipe for 62nd Street is a 48"
diameter pIpe for the followmg reasons
1 The 48" pipe will gIve the CIty a hIgh degree of design flexibilIty regarding the
enlargement of the 62nd Street Pond and the configuratIon of the outlet.
2 The relatIvely small amount of overland flow and the low frequency when it would occur
with a 48" pIpe that would occur on an intenm basIS until the upstream rate measures are
mcorporated or under existmg condItIons would be a long term maintenance benefit for
the CIty See Table 2b - 62nd Street Pond - optIOn 1a & 3.
3 The cost savings of a 42" pIpe compared to a 48" pipe for 62nd Street Pond is relatIvely
mSIgnificant ($30,000) compared to the overall cost and the loss of benefits prOVIded by a
48" outlet.
StIllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If all of the rate control and water qualIty Improvements are implemented the phosphorus loadmg
from the whole watershed modeled leavmg the 620d Street Pond will be reduced by up to 9%
over eXIsting conditIons The maJonty of the water qualIty Improvement would be due to
Improvements WIthm the 620d Street and W ashIngton Avenue Ponds. The total reduction m
pollutant loading for the overall watershed at 620d Street Pond IS relatIvely msensitIve to whether
dramage dIversion of Upper HIghland sub-distrIct occurs
Stillwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Summary
This report IdentIfies several rmprovements that could be made to rmprove the management of
surface water WIthm the Market Place Area. The improvements are scattered throughout the
watershed m Stillwater. The Improvements focus on reducing the peak dIscharge and improVIng
the quality of runoff from the Market Place Area. The 62nd Street Pond IS the furthest
downstream pond WIthm the study area The mcrementalImprovement in rate control and water
qualIty protection leaVIng the 62nd Street Pond begmnmg with existing conditions is summarIZed
below.
Existing 620d Street Pond
. 100-year peak dIscharge of230 cfs
. Phosphorus loading removal from watershed of 61 %.
620d Street Pond Scenario #4: 62nd Street Pond expanded with no upstream improvements
. 1 DO-year peak discharge of 197 cfs
. Phosphorus loadIng removal from watershed of 66%.
62nd Street Pond Scenario #3: 62nd Street Pond expanded with rmprovements to Tower Dnve
& Market Dnve Ponds.
. 100-year peak discharge of 143 cfs.
. Phosphorus loadmg removal from watershed of 67%.
62nd Street Pond Scenario #2: 62nd Street Pond Scenario #3 plus Improvements to Waslungton
Avenue and Market Place Ponds.
. 1 DO-year peak discharge of 131 cfs.
. Phosphorus loading removal from watershed of 69%
Stlllwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Improvements to aclueve scenario #2 Will provide significant rate control of runoff leaVIng
the Market Place Area. The water quality Improvements are sigmficant also for scenario #3, but
the net effect on improving the quality of runoff from the overall watershed is limited. The small
gam m water quality protectIon when lookmg at a watershed scale IS due to the large volume of
runoff contributed by Oak Park HeIghts that IS treated to a high qualIty.
62nd Street Pond Scenario #1: 62nd Street Pond Scenario #3 plus drainage dIverSIOn in
Highlands and Improvements to ClImc Site Pond
. 1 DO-year peak dIscharge of 125 cfs.
. Phosphorus loading removal from watershed of 70%
The Improvements to achieve scenario #4 will benefit the HIghlands and Wildwood Pines ponds.
These Improvements will not result m appreciable added water quality protection for Long Lake
Stzllwater Market Place Surface Water l\1anagement Study
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recommendations
The followmg recommendatIons are presented for the City Council's consIderation based upon
the data compiled in this report
1 Adopt this report as a gwde for development and management of the surface water
system within the Market Place Area of Stillwater
2 Pursue the implementation of Improvement optIons IdentIfied to achieve scenario #3 for
the 62nd Street Pond as a mmimum goal. ConsIder additIona11mprovements to achieve
scenano #2 for implementation now or m the future when funding is available.
3 Ensure that development plans Within the Market Place Area meet the critena established
m this report
4 Develop cost estimates for selected scenano( s) and determme fundIng needs and sources
5. Proceed With easement and land acquisition for selected scenario(s),
6 If the City deCIdes to Implement scenarIO #2, then proceed With preparation of plans and
specIficatIons.
Stillwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Stillwater Market Place Surface Water Management Study
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~- ..-
36"
- "
'~~
,
~
:I
,
,
,
,
, '
, "'
'lit
, .
"'
o 100 200
ISC~le in fee~ N
, - -
"
/ CLINIC SITE POND
EX~.AN~ON ."
... .. : ~ ~
. .
,
, '
,
.' ,,' -f
~ ,,',l'
, 17 1 ~~ ,-
'~~ln'L ~
HIGHLAND HILLS-1 SUBDISTRICT DRAINAGE
DIVERSIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO CLINIC SITE POND
/
CITY OF STILLWATER FIGURE 1
MARKET PLACE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY
.11. Bonestroo
..uII Rosene
G Anderlik &
. \I, Associates
Engineers & Architects
\51 0\51 0804\CAO\OWG\51098804W03 DWG
COMM
3\18\99
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .-
I
I
I
I
I
, .'
: >
" ,
~~
, .
, '
~
" p' c
>
" ~, l>
I " ,
, ~
.
f, ,
,
, ..
,
, "
, I
,
> c'
0 50 100 . .
.
I I r I
. .
Scale an feet .
?
"
,
,
"
."
,
,
,
l
';' ... -,'" ..J" / ~
-"
,
...... .......
, '^'
" "'--
. '
,
,
... ...... '"
,
. , '"
, '.
, '
....
, ~
-'
, '
..... - .-
""_ J' ~ - - _ ......
.
-- .
--- - -,.
~
-r-
-'"
, ,
-~------------~-----~--~-
. "
...... . ~
-"'.............-.-......-,
~
----
----...
,
FIGURE 2
~ Bonestroo
Rosene
8 Anderlik &
,\I, -Associates
Engineers & Architects
TOWER DRIVE POND IMPROVEMI
CITY OF STILLWATER
MARKET PLACE SURFACE WATER MAl
\510\510804\CAO\OWG\51098804WOl OWG
Cl
o 50 1 00
I I N
Scale in feet__ .- t ' ,
:J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ,
~
^
" -
. ,)
.... -., ......-..
,
,
,
~
- - .
--............
- . .........
n
, -
"'" "...
WASHINGTON/HWY 36 POND IMPROVEMENTS
936
926
, ... ... .....
-.. -.....
...... -.. ...-..-
.. .-..- ..I ' Y ""..
917
9 5
" .."., 01':" +.. ....
.
~... .........-.. -.t' "........
-
........ ....... .... ..
.....
c
L
,
.
I'
........... '"
/'
~
- -.
. . -
. fl. Bonestroo
... Rosene
G Anderlik &
1 \11 Associates
Engineers & Arohltects
CITY OF STILLWATER FIGURE 3
MARKET PLACE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMETN STUDY
3\18\99
\51 0\51 0804\CAD\DWG\51 098804W04 DWG
COMM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
able 1 - Drainaae Areas
Drainage
Area Designation Area % Paved Surface
(acres) (existing) (ultimate)
Upper Hlahlands 38 35% 35%
Lower Highlands 37 28% 28%
Cottages 21 46% 46%
Autumn Woods 18 36% 36%
Wildwood Pines West 149 26% 26%
Wildwood Pines East 28 60% 60%
Clinic Site 23 7% 76%
Washington East 78 63% 63%
Washlnaton West 5 51% 67%
Tower Drive 14 41% 53%
St CroIx Sports 15 47% 65%
Market Drive 15 36% 65%
Oak Park Heights 278 NA NA
T H 36/CSAH 5 Interchange 17 31% NA
Market Place 77 57% 59%
62nd Street 23 3% 44%
Total DraInage Area (acres) 836
Notes:
a) NA Not Available
b) The CliniC Site dramage area IS the only Significant parcel of
land yet undeveloped
-------------------
Water Quantity Pond Data
a e a- XIS mg on mg asms m I wa er
I Nonnal I High Pond Area Storage Volume Peak
PondlD Tnbutarv Area (acres) Water I Water (acres) ( ac-ft) Outflow Outlet Control
Direct Ponded Total Level Level @NWL IRl I-nAil Dry Wet (cfs)
~ ' ..,..
Highlands Basin 75 0 75 9315 9435 0 1 2 67 0 382 21" Pipe
Cottaoes Basin 21 75 97 909 9141 0 1 22 0 512 36" culvert
Autumn Woods Pond 18 0 18 918 9205 06 1 2 06 4 8" onfice & 20" DIS
Wildwood Pines Pond 177 115 292 908 914 317 96 411 63 49 36" Pipe
Clime Site Pond 23 0 23 936 9409 09 25 54 25 18 4" onfice & 5' weir
Washington Ave Pond 82 23 105 926 9336 04 1 7 105 03 112 42" Dlpe
Tower Dnve Pond 14 0 14 9276 9306 0 06 1 2 0 323 30" Dlpe
St Croix SpOrts Pond 15 0 15 912 916 04 05 1 8 1 3 197 4" onfice & 4'x1 3' onflce
Market Dnve Pond 15 15 30 906 911 02 04 1 5 03 54 36" Dlpe
Oak Park Heights 278 278 Refer to 1995 OPH Annexation Area SWMP 355 24" culvert
T H 36/CSAH 5 Interchange 3 14 17 2 onds within Hwv 36/CSAH 5 Interchan! e 95 21" DIPe
Market Place Pond 77 444 521 905 911 33 I 53 257 146 176 36" & 48" culverts
62nd Street Pond 23 813 836 9005 9023 2 I 235 33 45 230 overland spillway
T bl 2 E" f P d" B
" Sfn t
-------------------
Table 2b - Proposed 0 I Icatlons 0 on ma asms m I wa r
Normal High Pond Area Storage Vol (ac Peak
PondlD Tnbutarv Area acres) Water Water (acres) ft) Outflow Outlet Control
Direct Ponded Total Level Level @NWL @HWL Dry Wet (cfs)
Highlands Basin 37 0 37 9315 940 0 08 35 0 107 12" onfice & 48" DIS
Cottages Basin 21 37 59 909 915 0 1 1 29 0 171 12" onflce & 60" DIS
Autumn Woods Pond Unchanaed Unchanged
Wildwood Pines Pond 177 77 254 908 913 317 87 32 63 41 36" PIDe
Clime Site Pond 61 0 61 936 9409 1 9 26 11 7 76 18 4" onflce & 5' weir
Washington Ave Pond 78 61 138 926 9335 165 24 1475 66 38 24" onflce restnctlon on 42" DIDe
Tower Dnve Pond 19 0 19 9281 934 06 1 1 51 2 1 5 5" onfice restnctlon on 30" pipe
St CroIx Sports Pond Unchanged Unchanged
Market Dnve Pond 15 15 30 906 913 02 045 23 03 50 12" onflce & 60" DIS
Oak Park Heights 278 278 Refer to 1995 OPH Annexation Area SWMP 355 24" culvert
T H 36/CSAH 5 Interchanae 3 14 17 2 ponds Within Hwv 36/CSAH 5 InterchanQe 95 21" pipe
Market Place Pond - oDtlon 1 77 482 559 905 911 33 53 257 146 88 40" onflce restriction on 48" culvert
62nd St Pond - ODtlon 1 a 23 813 836 9005 9035 335 42 104 11 5 125 + 0 48" Pice With overflow at 905 5'
62nd St Pond - ODtlon 1 b Unchanaed 9005 906 335 47 227 11 5 104 + 18 42" PIDe With overflow at 905 5'
Market Place Pond - option 2 Unchanaed I 905 I 911 33 53 257 146 88 40" onflce restnctlon on 48" culvert
62nd St Pond - option 2 Unchanged 9005 9041 335 44 I 141 11 5 131 + 0 48" pipe With overflow at 905 5'
Market Place Pond - option 3 Unchanged 905 9104 1 33 51 I 225 146 I 160 36" & 48" culverts
62nd St Pond - ODtlon 3 Unchanged 9005 906 I 335 47 I 227 11 5 1143 + 20 48" Pipe With overflow at 9055'
M d"fi
t P d" B
" Sfn te
l62nd St Pond - option 4 Unchanged I 900 5 I 906 I 3 35 I 47 I 22 7 I 11 5 1145 + 55148" pipe WIth overflow at 905'
Notes:
a) Pondlng data assumes fully developed conditions
b) DIS Drop Inlet structure, acting as a secondary outlet
c) Option 1 assumes that all upstream rate control and pondlng Improvements are Implemented
d) Option 2 assumes that all upstream rate control measures are
Implemented With exception of drainage diversion In Highlands
e) Option 3 assumes that all upstream rate control measures are Implemented With
exception of Washlngton/Hwy 36 pond and drainage diversion In Highlands
f) Option 4 assumes that no upstream rate control measures are Implemented
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Water Quality Pond Data
Table 3a - Water Qualitv Pond Data with Existina Basins
Phosphorus Remov8f
PondlD Tnbutarv Area acres) (%) From Svstem
Within Within
Direct Ponded Total Pond Watershed
Hlahlands Basin 75 0 75 <5 <5
Cottages Basin 21 75 97 <5 <5
Autumn Woods Pond 18 0 18 45 45
Wildwood Pines Pond* 149 97 246 50 50
Chmc Site Pond 23 0 23 49 49
Washlnaton Ave Pond 82 23 105 8 21
Tower Dnve Pond 14 0 14 <5 <5
St CroIx Sports Pond 15 0 15 50 50
Market Dnve Pond 15 15 30 20 40
Oak Park Helahts 0 278 278 NA 68
T H 36/CSAH 5 Interchanae 3 14 17 NA 50
Market Place Pond 77 444 521 32 62
62nd Street Pond* 51 785 836 12 61
* For water quahty modeling, drainage from Wildwood Pines East may be essentially viewed as
bypassing Wildwood Pines Pond and flow directly to 62nd Street Pond since storm sewer
Junction IS downstream of Wildwood Pines Pond outlet
Table 3b - Water Quality Pond Data with all Improvements
I I ted" T bl 2b
mPlemen m a e
Phosphorus Removal
PondlD Tnbutarv Area lacres) (%) From Svstem
Within Within
Direct Ponded Total Pond Watershed
Highlands Basin 37 0 37 UnchanQed
Cottaaes Basin 21 37 59 Unchanaed
Autumn Woods Pond Unchanled
Wildwood Pines Pond 177 77 254 51 51
Chnlc Site Pond 61 0 61 60 60
Washington Ave Pond 78 61 138 49 63
Tower Dnve Pond 19 0 19 56 56
St CroIx Sports Pond Unchanaed
Market Dnve Pond Unchanaed
Oak Park Heights Unchanged
T H 36/CSAH 5 Interchange Unchanced
Market Place Pond 77 482 559 29 I 69
62nd street pond 51 785 I 836 23 I 70
Notes:
a) NA Not applicable
b) Water quality data assumes fully developed conditions