HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-244
i
'.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 244
DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION
AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
FOR PHASE I, ANNEXATION PROPERTY
L.I. 9626
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA:
1. A certain petition requesting improvements for Phase I Annexation Property, filed with
the council on October 1, 1996, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of
owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.035.
2. The petition is hereby referred to the City Engineer and he is instructed to report to the
council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the
proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as
recommended.
Adopted by the council this 1st day of October, 1996~
~4
Attest:
,Jlllt:01-199614'32
..
.
1.
612 731 4869
CHARLES CUDD CO.
P.03
Petition For Local Improvement 000% of property owners)
&c::rr11-t... W-A-r e- f9.-
Minnesota ,e.-r.....~
.19~
To the City Council of ~u..W~ , Minnesota:
taAfIr NJP
We, all owners of real propertYA abutting on ~M~rfNlii ~t. est'Neew
~1H * tf^"(1t2" iifle of" Sheet ~,d the line of
Street hereby petition that such street is improved by ............ ,.,.y 2 pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes. Chapter 429.
1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
.
Signature of Owner Description of =eny
"., Atf'rAd -
~ ~-tY "..."..~'P '3
~l$ 4)QO ~~"'( _ __--: ......:;...~C>.
~r;')G ~ ~ .s ~;
--
....." Ail I
"
Examined, checked, and found to be in proper fonn and to be signed by the required
number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
Footnotes
.
t~~~ ~J(~~
lty r
.
1.
When the petition ls by the "owners or aU" real propeny, no hearing or Dotice as mentioned at Form
S below is requited by the statute. However, the council should pus a resolution similar lO form 4
below, but in the fIrSt paragraph "all owners" should be substituted for the words "required percentage
ot owners." The valldity of this resoludon 11- made iacomestable by my tupaycr, property Owner Or
the municipality unless an action for that purpose is commenced within 30 days after adoption of the
resolution. M.S. 429.031, subd. 3. Unlike the Ii tuition where the peuuon is by less thm all the
propeny ownerS. no publication ot this reSOlution seems to be required by the statute. However. to
,void misunderstaDdinl by SOme property owners and possible objections to assessments at later stages
or the proceedinll,lhe eil)' may pretel' to mall 'copy or lhis resolution to tach owner. In rac:t, the city
In sucb cues may want to secure waivers of objections and rtlhts to appeal !rem each owner on
condition that the actual assessment amouo" \0 no more than the nlUfe agreccS to in the waiver. The
council is then in a aood position to make expenditures tor plan M<1 speeification pteparauon and
solicitation of bids. without risk to the Icner1l lrCUury. A model wa.ivu rorm 1$ set QU~ at Fonn 1
below.
-5-