Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2024-05-22 CPC Agenda Packet
��Illwfer The Birthplace of Minnesota J 216 41h Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.stillwatermn.gov AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 22, 2024 WORKSHOP The 5.30 Workshop will not be televised. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Planning Commission Work Plan Development REGULAR MEETING IV. CALL TO ORDER V. ROLL CALL VI. APPOINT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR VII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Possible approval of April 24, 2024 regular meeting minutes. 5:30 P.M. VIII. OPEN FORUM - Open Forum allows the public to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement or give direction to staff. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. IX. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) — these items are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. Anyone may request an item to be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS - Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. 3. Case No. CD2024-021: Interim Use Permit (renewal of previous approvals) for Mobile Food Unit for Gloria's to Go (Staff Reviewer: Ben Gutknecht, 651-430-8818, bgutknecht(b-stillwatermn.gov) 4. Case No. CD2024-004: Zoning Amendment, Planned Unit Development Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building (Staff Reviewer: Tim Gladhill, 651-430-8821, tgladhill .stillwatermn.gov) 5. Case No. CD2024-017: Variance to Maximum Lot Coverage for Proposed Deck at 3060 White Pine Way (Staff Reviewer: Katriona Molasky, 651-430-8822, kmolasky(@stillwatermn.gov) 6. Case No. CD2024-016: Conditional Use Permit for Indoor Commercial Recreation (Fitness Center) in the Central Business District at 107 Chestnut St E (Historic Armory Building) (Staff Reviewer: Tim Gladhill, 651-430-8821, tgladhill stillwatermn.gov) 7. Case No. CD2024-018: Variance to Front Yard Setback to Facilitate Accessibility Improvements at 522 4t" St S (Staff Reviewer: Katriona Molasky, 651-430-8822, kmolasky(a-)_stillwatermn.gov) 8. Case No. CD2024-019: Variance to Maximum Lot Coverage for Proposed Deck at 3480 87t" St N (Staff Reviewer: Katriona Molasky, 651-430-8822, kmolaskyC stillwatermn.gov) 9. Case No. CD2024-020: Variance to Maximum Lot Coverage for Proposed Pool at 3095 Lowell Ct (Staff Reviewer: Katriona Molasky, 651-430-8822, kmolasky(cD_stillwatermn.gov) XII. NEW BUSINESS 10. Zoning Code and Subdivision Code Amendment Work Plan, Framework, and Zoning Map/District Direction — No Packet Materials XIII. DISCUSSION XIV. FYI — STAFF UPDATES XV. ADJOURNMENT 1 1 Water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNES O T A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning Commission Workshop Outline DISCUSSION The purpose of this workshop is Part 2 of the process and intends to lay the foundation for an Annual Work Plan for the Planning Commission to help guide and prioritize its proactive policy work. Much of the workload of the Planning Commission is reacting to land use applications. However, an important element of the Planning Commission's work is land use policy through administering the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and Subdivision Code. From time to time, the Commission may also recommend other plans, programs, and policies outside the scope of these core documents. This workshop is the next in a series of multiple steps. The intent is to create a framework of a high-level vision and strategy. The Commission should expect smaller follow ups in regular meetings, especially in the context of upcoming updates to the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. During this workshop, Staff recommends covering the following. • Buickgro end Presentation Existing GendTtiOS, Plaarns o�Lc�rGs — Completed at April 17, 2024 • Planning Commission Purpose — Review and Approve draft created at April 17, 2024 Workshop • Planning Commission Vision Purpose April 17, 2024 Workshop • Priority Strategies Planning Commission Purpose — Review and Approve draft created at This exercise is intended to answer the following question. • Why does the Planning Commission exist today? Based on the April 17 Exercise, Staff posed the following draft Purpose Statement. The Planning Commission helps guide and communicate the future vision of the Community. It provides the voice of the community on important land use topics, ensuring a diverse set of voices have an opportunity to be heard. It ensures a safe, healthy, and vibrant community through the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Additionally, a Commissioner suggested the following version. Through diligent oversight of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, we commit to maintaining a safe, healthy, and vibrant community for everyone. Planning Commission Vision Statement This exercise is intended to answer the following question. • Where do we want to be/what do we want to look like in the future? • When we look back 10-20 years from now, how will we know if we were successful? The Planning Commission envisions a community that accelerates housing supply, retains and expands employment opportunities, and improves community accessibility that meets the Community's diverse needs. It strives to strike a balance between historic preservation and economic growth. The Commission also acknowledges a need to increase focus on community sustainability and transparency. A Commissioner did pose the following question. • What does it mean to accelerate housing supply? In essence, accelerating housing supply means removing barriers and increasing opportunities to maintain and expand housing supply. The Commission spent a considerable amount of time discussing the cost of housing for all residents. Planning Commission Strategies A bulk of the work of this Workshop will focus on developing specific strategies for the next 1-3 years. These are still high-level strategies that explain the `how' we will achieve our vision. These are not yet specific action items. Staff will develop a list of action items to be included in the Work Plan after this step. (499ateir THE lINTNELACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 24, 2024 WORKSHOP MEETING Chairman Dybvig called the workshop to order at 5:30 p.m. Present: Chairman Dybvig, Commissioners Cox, North, Steinwall, Swanson, Councilmember Odebrecht Absent: Commissioner Hoffman Staff: Community Development Director Gladhill, Planning Manager Gutknecht, Assistant City Planner Molasky OTHER BUSINESS Planning Commission Work Plan Development Community Development Director Gladhill explained that the workshop will cover: Planning Commission Purpose Statement; Planning Commission Vision; and Priority Strategies. He reviewed the structure and responsibilities of the Community Development Department and its Planning Division. Ed Nelsen, a member of the Human Rights Commission (HRC), said he is here because he believes it is important to find out what's going on in the various areas. The HRC may be of some help when doing strategic planning - for instance the water contamination problem includes some equity issues. If the recommendation ends up being for everybody to put a water filtration system on their home, that's not doable for every person in the community. He also is the Director of Development for Valley Outreach. Councilmember Odebrecht remarked that he would love to see the HRC get more involved with City business. Another equity issue is ADA accessibility, for example short term home rentals. Something needs to be done in that space without pricing everybody out of the market. Mr. Nelsen added that one of the concerns expressed to him by the community is not enough ADA handicap -accessible parking areas. Mr. Gladhill led an exercise asking participants to write their top five priorities in these areas. Purpose statement: why does the Commission exist? Commissioner Cox: voice of the community, consistency in decisions, safety for the community, to ask questions. Commissioner North: amplify existing assets, represent the whole community, actions should be clear and reasonable, set out a process which is repeatable, have a structure in place where a question is brought and you won't end up with 5 different answers for 5 different projects. Commissioner Swanson: communicate the vision to the public, guide the established vision, guidance on gray areas - not everything can be defined, question the status quo, maintain a high level focus, leave details to staff. Planning Commission April 24, 2024 Commissioner Steinwall: we're here because we're authorized by state statute to implement statutory requirements, among them is keep an eye on our Comp Plan and make sure it is implemented, day to day work acting on land use applications, and provide high level vision on the development of our community. Planning Manager Gutknecht: planned use review, recommending Comp Plan guidance to the Council and recommending policy decisions, public comment via the public hearing process. Councilmember Odebrecht: advise Council and staff, assist in historic preservation, land use regulation and execution "so the citizens don't sue us." Assistant City Planner Molasky: here to be a voice for the community, a group of many people creates diverse views and approaches, here to direct development, to review and recommend. Chairman Dybvig: listen to the community, create and preserve community standards, Comp Plan, we're the folks who deal with the square pegs in the round holes when it comes to development, and safety. Councilmember Odebrecht suggested the Chairman of the Commission participate in upcoming Comp Plan consultant interviews. Mr. Gladhill summarized that navigating the Comp Plan, being the voice of the community, and navigating the process seemed to be common themes. Councilmember Odebrecht stated that one thing the Commission does very well is nobody is dismissed here, all proposals are respected. Commissioner Steinwall suggested adding diversity to the list. She is concerned that talking about being the voice of the community may mean being the voice of the status quo. Councilmember Odebrecht commented it would be great to have somebody who's renting serve on the Commission. Vision for the future: 1) for the Planning Commission in terms of its makeup and what it's accomplishing: and 2) a vision for the community. Commissioner Swanson: preservation + growth = what? It's hard to blend both things. Utilize all perspectives - vision is a living breathing document. Future vision - housing for all. Commissioner Steinwall: when talking about growth - keep environment in mind and make sure growth is sustainable and preserves the great natural resources of Stillwater. Also the theme of historic preservation is an important element of the community. Housing mix - economic development needs to be done in a sustainable way. Apply rules that are consistent and treat all applicants fairly. Commissioner Cox: need a healthy balance between old and new. Diversity - about who is actually sitting on commission - preservation of natural spaces - quality of life in Stillwater is largely due to the river and parks - transparency. This should continue to be a community that people want to live in. Commissioner North: Stillwater has a brand. Repeating is to revisit what achieved that brand - maintain a vibrant economy, and having varied housing options and making it livable for the whole community - achieving preservation with modern style, varied architecture. Councilmember Odebrecht: preservation options that make sense. i.e. RE/MAX office in Sauntry Mansion. Watershed still works - existing affordable housing options are preserved. Page 2 of 6 Planning Commission April 24, 2024 Ms. Molasky: understandable process - diverse residents/community - positive experiences - engagement, getting feedback from community is important. Mr. Gutknecht: increasing diverse public engagement, housing diversity, consistency of administration of ordinances, proactive action and creative solutions over status -quo solutions. Chairman Dybvig: preserve the essence of Stillwater, evolve, sustainable, a diverse and available community. Mr. Gladhill: housing comes up quite a bit, balancing economic growth and historic preservation - sustainability and natural resources, process and experience, brand. He noted strategy could be discussed at the May workshop. Staff will put this into a couple statements for the Commission to review and will present the full package in June. The workshop was recessed at 6:46 p.m. RECESS REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairman Dybvig called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Dybvig, Commissioners Cox, North, Steinwall, Swanson, Councilmember Odebrecht Absent: Commissioner Hoffman Staff: Community Development Director Gladhill, Planning Manager Gutknecht, Assistant City Planner Molasky APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of March 27, 2024 regular meeting Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner North, to approve the minutes of the March 27, 2024 meeting. Motion passed 3-0-3 with Commissioners Cox and North and Councilmember Odebrecht abstaining. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items on the Consent Agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. CD 2024-014: Conditional Use Permit Amendment to Add Outdoor Saunas at 232 Main St N (Hotel Crosby/ Excelsior Sauna) Planning Manager Gutknecht explained that Hotel Crosby requests an Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 2016-40) for the installation and operation of three semi- permanent buildings, two sauna structures and one check-in/changing building with cold plunge located between the hotel and parking ramp, along the existing patio space. The saunas will be accessible to both the public and guests of the hotel. The communal sauna will be wood fired and the private saunas will be electric. All structures are primarily permanent in nature; Page 3 of 6 Planning Commission April 24, 2024 not easily moved or on wheels, but also are not constructed on a permanent foundation. The applicant is investigating possible options to make them removable in the event they need to be moved to access existing underlying stormwater infrastructure. It would not be a simple removal. The applicant had commenced construction on the project without City review or approval, but has since ceased work and has been highly cooperative in providing necessary materials for review. There are three possible options: 1) existing location at northeast corner [applicant preferred alternative]; 2) northern property line between private sidewalk and adjacent parking lot/property line; 3) southeast corner in patio area [applicant's least preferred]. Staff is generally supportive of the concept from a use and design perspective and is generally comfortable with the overall building design and exterior materials, but has concern with the current location due to proximity to the parking garage and conflicts with storm sewer infrastructure. The Heritage Preservation Commission (HPC) granted design approval last week for Alternative #1. The project will require the CUP Amendment (Planning Commission); Building Permit; Encroachment Agreement (City Council); and Washington County Department of Health (cold plunge pool). Staff prefers either Alternative #2 or #3 that avoids conflicts with stormwater infrastructure and building code regarding fire separation. He showed the location of the storm sewer easement. Staff does not have complete plans for Alternative #2 or #3. If it is the Commission's desire to approve Alternative #2 or #3, it should postpone action and direct the applicant to submit complete plans for that alternative. Commissioner Cox asked what conditions would be problematic not having easy access to the stormwater? Mr. Gladhill replied there are pipes underground that serve stormwater needs for this and other parcels. City Engineers have information how it could be moved without damaging the pipes and they feel there are solutions if necessary. Councilmember Odebrecht said he understands when access to those stormwater pipes is needed, it is needed fast. Mr. Gladhill said that would be true if this were a domestic water service or sanitary wastewater sewer. However with stormwater pipes, there is rarely such an emergency. If there was an emergency to be dealt with immediately, the City would do so at the property owner's cost. Commissioner Swanson asked what is the capacity of the stormwater line and is it a major trunk line that would impact neighbors? Mr. Gladhill said the City's engineering team has looked at it. It serves multiple properties but not all of downtown. The saunas will not break the pipe or create an obstruction. John Daly, Hotel Crosby said that City Engineer Sanders asked them to address those issues so they got a report from Larson Engineering which did the install back in 2016/17 prior to hotel opening in 2018. The Civil Engineer has the opinion there is no issue in the amount of water the system can handle, it was actually overbuilt to be adequate in the event of a 100 year flood. The proposed structures are liftable. Two companies said they could be lifted from their positions at any time. The HPC preferred Alternative #1 because it was tucked in and not visible by the public. Commissioner Swanson asked the applicant to explain the negatives of Alternatives 2 and 3. Leif Kjorness of Excelsior Saunas explained the two buildings are already framed and the present configuration gives the most space and keeps the courtyard as it is right now. Page 4 of 6 Planning Commission April 24, 2024 Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Commissioner Cox, to recommend that the City Council approve Resolution 2024- , Resolution Amending a Conditional Use Permit to Approve a Sauna Experience in the Central Business District for 232 Main Street North (Case No. CD2024-014) with all recommended conditions. Motion passed 5-1 with Councilmember Odebrecht voting nay. Case No. CD2024-012: 1904 5th Street North Plat Review Planning Manager Gutknecht explained that Frankie Peterson has applied for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat (Frankie Valley) to facilitate the splitting of one existing lot into two new lots at 1904 5th Street North. The property is approximately 39,963 square feet and contains a single-family dwelling with an attached garage and detached shed. The shed will be relocated to remain on the same lot as the existing dwelling. The existing property is accessed from Willow Street which is deficient in right-of-way size. As part of this Plat the applicant will dedicate approximately 1,450 square feet of right-of-way to Willow Street. Any new future proposed dwelling on lot 2 would require HPC design review. Due to the required right-of-way dedication the applicant must move forward with the subdivision via Plat process. Staff recommends approval with five conditions. Frankie Peterson, applicant, and Nick Thompson, builder, offered to answer questions. Chairman Dybvig opened the public hearing. There were no public comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Councilmember Odebrecht, to recommend that the City Council approve Resolution 2024- , Resolution Approving a Preliminary and Final Plat for Frankie Valley (Case No. CD2024-012. Chair Dybvig said he will probably support the request but recalled issues in the past with approving a lot subdivision without knowing what the plans will be for the new lot. He noticed the landowner and developer that it will not be looked on favorably if they come back in six months requesting a lot of variances. Mr. Gutknecht reiterated that any new proposed dwelling will require design review and conformance with land use standards. All in favor. NEW BUSINESS Zoning Code and Subdivision Code Amendment Work Plan. Framework. and Zoning MaJ2/District Direction Mr. Gladhill stated that throughout 2024 and into 2025 the Planning Division will be conducting a comprehensive zoning code amendment. He reviewed the goals and scope of work, and the project timeline. DISCUSSION There were no discussion items FYI STAFF UPDATES Boards and Commissions Training Page 5 of 6 Planning Commission April 24, 2024 Mr. Gutknecht reminded the Commission of the Boards and Commissions Training May 8 for those who did not attend last year. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Dybvig adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. ATTEST: John Dybvig, Chair Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director Page 6 of 6 1 ater THE BIRTHPLACE O F M INN E S O T A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Ben Gutknecht, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-021: Interim Use Permit for Seasonal Outdoor Seasonal Food Vending at 127 Main Street South (Leo's Grill and Malt Shop) BACKGROUND The Applicant, Cory Buettner, is seeking an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for seasonal outdoor seasonal food vending located at 127 Main Street South, Leo's Grill and Malt Shop (the "Property"). The entirety of the Property has frontage on Main Street South, Water Street South, and Chestnut Street Plaza. The property is located in the Central Business zoning district and lies within the Downtown Stillwater Design Review District. The applicant has been operating the proposed food vending on site in some capacity since 2020, and has been operating "Gloria's To Go" since 2021. The City Council adopted a comprehensive code amendment that went into effect on March 15t", 2024 and changed requirements for seasonal outdoor sales (including mobile food units) in the Central Business District. Interim Use Permits are needed when food trucks are proposed on a property for more than four days. Within the Central Business District, food trucks are only allowed on private property owned and adjacent to restaurants, breweries, and distilleries. Heritage Preservation Commission design review is still a requirement. Due to the change in Code, the applicant is required to receive an Interim Use Permit for operating longer than 4 days. The Heritage Preservation Commission reviewed and approved the Design of Gloria's To Go in 2021. The design of the food vending operation has not changed since then therefore Design Review is not necessary as part of this request. The Applicant seeks to continue operating a seasonal food vending truck in its current space April 2024 through December 2024. The proposed truck would continue to occupy patio space in the private patio area where it has been located the previous two (2) years. Proposed hours of operation are 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven days a week. During the Spring and Fall they will generally operate weekends, and operate seven (7) days a week during the Summer. The unit is powered via electricity and connected to City Water. When initially approved in 2021, the applicant paid the required Water Availability Charge for said connection. Trash from the proposed trailer would be disposed of using Leo's on- premise dumpster and removal service. Sewer, propane, and natural gas are not needed for the vending unit. AMAI YSIS The purpose of an IUP is to provide flexibility to the district use regulations. IUP's are temporary in nature and due to these temporary characteristics, require special consideration so they may be located properly with respect to the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and respect to their effects on surrounding properties. In order to achieve these purposes, the Planning Commission is empowered to grant and to deny applications for IUPs and to impose reasonable conditions upon the granting of these permits. The Planning Commission may grant an interim use permit for the interim use of a property if: 1. The use conforms to the zoning regulations; 2. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; 3. Permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the city if it is necessary for the city to take the property in the future; and 4. The user agrees in writing to any conditions that the Planning Commission deems appropriate for permission of the use Staff finds that the use conforms with the zoning regulations and the newly adopted comprehensive code amendment, that the proposed dates of operation are identified with certainty, that the request would not impose additional costs on the city if it is necessary for the city to take the property in the future, and has confirmed that the Applicant agrees to any/all conditions that the Planning Commission may impose. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Planning Commission approve the interim use permit request for seasonal outdoor sales/outdoor seasonal food vending with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit a complete Annual Food Vending Permit for administrative approval to the Community Development Department, including all required attachments and inspections before the trailer may be located at the site and/or in operation. 2. All plans shall be reviewed and approved by applicable fire and building inspection personnel prior to location and/or operation. 3. The Applicant must secure all necessary approvals from Washington County health officials. 4. The Interim Use Permit shall terminate or be brought before the Planning Commission should there be any changes to the approved plans. 5. The Interim Use Permit may be renewed annually by the Community Development Director as allowed by City Code. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to recommend approval of the Interim Use Permit request to allow for seasonal outdoor sales/outdoor seasonal food vending located at 127 Main Street South from April 1st, 2024 through December 31st, 2024 to the City Council. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024- RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FORTHE PLACEMENT OF A SEASONAL FOOD VENDING TRAILER AT 127 MAIN STREET SOUTH (LEO'S GRILL & MALT SHOP) (CASE NO. CD2024-021) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received Interim Use Permit and Seasonal Food Vending Permit applications from Cory Buettner ("Applicant"), for the placement of a food vending trailer for more than four days in one location located at 127 Main Street South, legally described as in Exhibit A (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the proposed food vending trailer will be operating at 127 Main Street South from April 1st, 2024 through December 31st, 2024; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2024, the City Planning Commission for the City of Stillwater considered the interim use permit, and recommended approval of the request; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City Council for the City of Stillwater considered the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the interim use permit for a seasonal food vending trailer at its June 4, 2024 meeting. The approval of the interim use permit is subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS • The use conforms to the Zoning District • The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty • Permission of the use will no impose additional costs on the City if it is necessary for the City to take the Property in the future • The user agrees in writing to any conditions that the Planning Commission deems appropriate for permission of the use CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The Applicant shall submit a complete Annual Food Vending Permit for administrative approval to the Community Development Department, including all required attachments and inspections before the trailer may be located at the site and/or in operation. 2. All plans shall be reviewed and approved by applicable fire and building inspection personnel prior to location and/or operation. 3. The Applicant must secure all necessary approvals from Washington County health officials. 4. The Interim Use Permit shall terminate or be brought before the Planning Commission should there be any changes to the approved plans. 5. The Interim Use Permit may be renewed annually by the Community Development Director as allowed by City Code. Adopted by the City Council this 4tn day of June, 2024 CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Abstract Property Type Situs Address: 127 Main Street South Parcel ID: 28-030-20-41-0124 The South 25 feet of the West 41 feet and 10 inches of Lot 5 in Block 27 of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, and also all that part of Lot 5 in Block 27 of the original Town (now City) of Stillwater, bounded as follows: to -wit: Beginning at a point in the East line of Main Street in said -City, 25 feet Northerly from the North line of Chestnut Street in said City and running thence Easterly on the line parallel with said North line of Chestnut Street80 feet; thence Northerly parallel with said East line of Main Street 25 feet to the North line of said Lot 5; thence West 80 feet to said East line of Main Street; thence Southerly along said East line of Main Street 25 feet to the place of beginning; excepting therefrom the South 8 inches of the East 38 feet and 8 inches thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. All that part of Lot 5, Block 27, of the original town (now City) of Stillwater, bounded as follows, viz: Beginning at a point in the North line of said Lot 5, 80 feet East of the East line of Main Street running thence Southerly on a line parallel with said East line of Main Street 25 feet to a point; thence Easterly on a line parallel with the North line of said lot number 5, one foot and 8 inches to a point; thence Southerly on a line parallel with said East line of Main Street 25 feet to the North line of Chestnut Street; thence Easterly along said North line of Chestnut Street 38 feet and 4 inches to the West line of Water Street on Stimpson's Alley; thence Northerly along the said West line of -Water Street, 50 feet to the North line of said Lot 5, and thence Westerly along said North line of said Lot 5, 40 feet more or less to the point of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota C►��'' A t dik 1 Ben Gutknecht From: Cory Buettner <corybuettner@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 10:27 AM To: Ben Gutknecht Subject: IUP Application for Gloria's Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Ben, Here is the information you requested for the Interim Use Permit: Gloria's operates in a concession stand at 314 Chestnut St East. The legal address of the lot is 127 Main Street South; the "L" shaped lot extends eastward to the corner of Chestnut Street and Water Street. The stand is located in the South West Corner of the lot owned by Buettner Real Estate, LLC. Flattop, LLC operates Leo's Grill & Malt Shop and Gloria's. Both LLCs are owned and operated by Naashom and Cory Buettner. Gloria's specializes in premium soft serve ice cream and authentic Chicago style hot dogs. We also offer Dole Whip soft serve as a non-dairy option. Cones, Sundaes, Blenders, Floats and Freezes along with grab and go Sandwiches with fresh Kettle Chips and ice cold Beverages are served. The facility is stylized after, and reminiscent of, a 1950-60's ice cream stand. Our menu is true Americana with affordable prices. "Home of the $2.49 Cone" The serving windows are located on the East side of the stand allowing customers to form a que within the premises. The stand does not block any emergency exits. There is adequate storage within the facility to accommodate our operations. A trash 1 receptacle is present next to the stand for patrons. Trash and recycling gathered from guests, as well as production, are deposited in the trash enclosure on the premises. As weather and pedestrian traffic permits, we will operate Noon - 10 pm, 7 days a week, April through December 2024. We generally operate during weekends in the Spring and Fall and Daily during the Summer months. We have operated in December serving Free Hot Chocolate, Coffee and cookies during the annual City of Stillwater Christmas Tree lighting party. Electricity is provided by Xcel Energy. Fresh water is supplied by the City of Stillwater. The concession stand is attached to the City of Stillwater sanitary sewer system. Neither natural gas, nor propane are used in Gloria's. Please see attached images of our signage, menu, application, site layout, and license from Washington County Health Dept. Q c`oR ws M AL rrrr,r•q.T �-_3.►. .r.4MOO,�f��t:.f.f=tf+i,�_-.��•�,�- - _.147 r sue.- % awl go g � "RUN% - 1 1 Water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNES O T A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Case No. CD 2024-004: Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building DISCUSSION The City has received multiple applications to facilitate the approval of the Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building. The proposal is for a 30 Unit Medium Density Residential Building. Zoning Approvals necessary to facilitate this project include the following. • Zoning Map Amendment & Lot Line Adjustment (for one small `infill' parcel) • Conditional Use Permit (for the overall use) • Planned Unit Development Amendment (to amend the overall master plan for the Washington County Government Center Campus) • Site Plan Review (for compliance with Zoning Code Massing Standards) The Washington Center Government Center is set up as an overall campus and approved by a Planned Unit Development. This proposed building would be an additional building to the existing campus. This would include shared parking facilities in addition to new parking constructed as part of this project. The scope of the Planning Commission review is limited to conformance with the City's Zoning Code. Discussion on the needs and merits of this proposed use and service is not in the scope of the Planning Commission's review. Additional materials are anticipated to be provided prior to the meeting. Specifically, a draft resolution for Findings and Conditions of Approval will be available early next week. For more information on the project, Washington County has set up a webpage at https://co.washington.mn.us/EHSB. Zoning District The Washington County Government Center is located in the PA. Public Administrative Offices District. `Residences of all classes' are allowed as a Conditional Use in this District. The proposed use does not appear to fall into any other use category in the Zoning Code with more stringent standards. Residential uses in the PA: Public Administrative Offices District are subject to the standards of the RCM: Medium Density Multiple -Family Residential District. The proposal appears to meet all the minimum standards of the RCM: Medium Density Multiple -Family Residential District. The request includes a Zoning Map Amendment. This is a minor amendment to apply the same district to a 0.3 acre portion of the campus that was inadvertently left off the Official Zoning map when this 0.3 acre parcel was annexed into the City in 2019. This is the same parcel that is subject to the Lot Consolidation Request whereby this individual parcel (only a portion of the proposed site plan) would be incorporated into the overall campus parcel. IL . 0,. Area of Zoning Map Amendment Traffic and Parking A Traffic Impact Study has been completed by the Applicant. Staff is reviewing the results of said traffic study and will provide a final recommendation prior to the meeting. While additional traffic and minor intersection delays should be expected (as would be expected with any new construction project), Staff does not believe the proposed use would materially change any Levels of Service as established by acceptable traffic engineering standards. While there is no direct access to Highway 36, the site is abutting Highway 36. As such, the proposal has been sent to MnDOT for review and comment. Staff is awaiting the response from MnDOT, but does not expect any objection. The Site Plan proposed an additional sixteen (16) parking stalls. Additionally, an existing parking lot is just across the internal access drive for the Government Center Campus. With the overall campus approach, Staff recommends that minimum parking requirements are met and can be incorporated into the Planned Unit Development Amendment. Slope Regulations The site is located in close proximity to a Steep Slope. The Applicant, City Staff, and the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization (WMO) have had multiple discussions about protections of this slope, especially in regards to the reconfiguration of an existing stormwater pond near the top of this slope. The proposed site plan appears to comply with applicable Zoning Code Standards for Steep Slopes (30 foot setback for structure, 10 foot setback for roads and paved surfaces). Utilities Per availability of utilities and previous agreements between the City of Stillwater, Washington County, and the City of Oak Park Heights, utilities are proposed to be provided by the City of Oak Park Heights. This site was previously part of the City of Oak Park Heights. Through a series of previous boundary adjustments to consolidate the Washington County Government Center into one jurisdiction (Zoning Authority), this site was subsequently included in the City of Stillwater. Public Enaaaement Prior to 2024, Washington County had engaged with City Staff on site selection for this proposed use. That process ultimately led to Washington County proposing this use on their campus. On January 2, 2024, Washington County presented the current proposal (at a concept level) for review and comment to the City Council. No official action or recommendation was taken at this meeting. Included in that discussion was support for a broader public engagement process to review community support. Throughout April, 2024, Washington County hosted a series of open houses. Open Houses were held at Stillwater City Hall (April 10), Washington County Government Center (April 11), and Oak Park Heights City Hall (April 16). Specific to the Public Hearing, the City has received public comment, included in this report. Citv of Oak Park Heiahts Coordination In addition to utility service from the City of Oak Park Heights, a number of the adjacent and nearby properties are located in the City of Oak Park Heights. Since a site was selected for review, and subsequent Land Use Application, Staff has kept in contact with Oak Park Heights Staff. More detailed coordination for utility connections will be needed if this project is approved by the Stillwater City Council. A response from the City of Oak Park Heights is included in this packet. The City of Oak Park Heights requests the following conditions of approval. Requested Condition Stillwater Staff Response The EHSB shall be staffed 24 hours per Consistent with Washington County's day, 7 days per week by a qualified proposal. Nothing in Stillwater City Code Washington County employee and/or would require this (there are no third -party contractor. performance standards for this type of use), however could be considered a reasonable condition of approval to mitigate reasonable concerns. The EHSB use shall fully comply with the Through the Planned Unit Development City of Stillwater's parking requirements. and shared parking arrangements, the proposal complies with parking requirements. The EHSB utility plan shall be subject to Reasonable request, as the utilities are review and written approval by the Oak owned by the City of Oak Park Heights. Park Heights City Engineer. Permitting and approval comes from the City of Oak Park Heights. Any future expansion to the number of Stillwater City Code allows for smaller beds within the EHSB shall require a expansions with administrative approval. public hearing and an amendment to the Staff would recommend that any future CUP and/or PUD. expansion be reviewed consistent with City Code Chapter 28, Article II Administration and Enforcement). Additionally, Staff notified any City of Oak Park Heights parcel located within 350 feet of the property line of the Washington County Government Center Campus. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Zoning Applications for Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB). City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota AN ORDINANCE AMENDING OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER TO INCLUDE 15055 60TH ST N IN THE PA: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES DISTRICT CASE NO. CD 2024-004 The City Council of the City of Stillwater does ordain: SECTION 1 AMENDMENT. The zoning of the following property, depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto, is hereby rezoned from a no district designation to be rezoned as PA: Public Administrative Offices District: Property located at 15055 60th St North (PID# 3403020330106) SECTION 2 EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be effective after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this 18th day of June 2024. ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor EXHIBIT A City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024-XXX RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO FACILITATE AN EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING AT 14949 62ND ST N (WASHINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER) CASE NO. CD 2024-004 WHEREAS, a request from Washington County has been received for an amendment to their existing planned unit development to facilitate the construction of the Emergency Housing Services Building ("EHSB") located at 14949 62nd St N; and WHEREAS, the original planned unit development was approved on to facilitate a master planned campus and to exceed maximum building height; and WHEREAS, the planned unit development was amended on to facilitate an expansion of the campus; and WHEREAS, the current request to amend the planned unit development adds the EHSB to the planned unit development and clarifies that the campus approach satisfies parking requirements for the EHSB; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 22, 2024 and recommended that the City Council the request.; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota hereby approves the conditional use permit located at 14949 62nd St N. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 18th day of June, 2024 CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024-XXX RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSOLIDATION OF PARCELS AT 14949 62ND ST N CASE NO. CD 2024-004 WHEREAS, a request from Washington County("Applicant") has been received to consolidate two existing parcels to facilitate the construction of the Emergency Housing Services Building ("EHSB") located at 14949 62nd St N, legally described as in Exhibit A (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the lot consolidation is required for the Applicant to move forward with the EHSB; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request on May 22, 2024 and recommended that the City Council the request.; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2024, the City Council reviewed the consolidation request as shown in Exhibit B, and found it consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and Comprehensive Plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota hereby approves the Consolidation. CONDITIONS 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-004 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Any minor modification to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the City Council. Determination of the distinction between Major and Minor is defined in City Code Chapter 28 (Zoning) Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 18th day of June, 2024 CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024-XXX RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL USE IN THE PA: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES DISTRICT TO FACILITATE AN EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING AT 14949 62ND ST N (WASHINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER) CASE NO. CD 2024-004 WHEREAS, a request from Washington County has been received for a Conditional Use Permit for a Residential Use in the PA: Public Administrative Offices District to facilitate the construction of the Emergency Housing Services Building ("EHSB") located at 14949 62nd St N; and WHEREAS, the PA: Public Administrative Offices District allows 'Residences of all classes' as a conditional use and states that said residences are subject to RCM: Medium Density Residential District Standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on May 22, 2024 and recommended that the City Council the request.; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota hereby approves the conditional use permit located at 14949 6211 St N. FINDINGS 1. The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the Comprehensive Plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations 2. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed 3. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. CONDITIONS 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-004 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Any minor modification to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the City Council. Determination of the distinction between Major and Minor is defined in City Code Chapter 28 (Zoning) 3. The EHSB shall be staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week by a qualified Washington County employee and/or third -party contractor 4. The EHSB shall fully comply with the City of Stillwater's parking requirements 5. The EHSB utility plan shall be subject to review and written approval by the Oak Park Heights City Engineer 6. Any future expansion to the number of beds within the EHS shall require a public hearing and an amendment to the conditional use permit and planned unit development Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 18th day of June, 2024 CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk Commented [TGI]: These conditions were requested by the City of Oak Park Heights City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024-XXX RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN TO FACILITATE AN EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING AT 14949 62ND ST N (WASHINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER) CASE NO. CD 2024-004 WHEREAS, a request from Washington County has been received for site plan approval to facilitate the construction of the Emergency Housing Services Building ("EHSB") located at 14949 62nd St N; and WHEREAS, the PA: Public Administrative Offices District allows `Residences of all classes' as a conditional use and states that said residences are subject to RCM: Medium Density Residential District Standards. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request on May 22, 2024 and recommended that the City Council the request.; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota hereby approves the site plan located at 14949 62nd St N. CONDITIONS 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-004 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Any minor modification to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the City Council. Determination of the distinction between Major and Minor is defined in City Code Chapter 28 (Zoning) Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 18th day of June, 2024 CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk 4r LH8 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NARRATIVE Emergency Housing Services Building Washington County April 24, 2024 To: Tim Gladhill, Stillwater Community Development Director From: Emily Timm, Project Architect Re: Planning Review Meeting — May 22, 2024 Address: 14949 62nd Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 PID. 3303020440030 PROJECT OVERVIEW The Washington County Community Development Agency, on behalf of Washington County, is proposing the development of new emergency housing with services for unsheltered adults. The Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB) will provide 30 hotel -style dwelling units with in a 26,000 square foot, two story, slab on grade structure located on 2 acres at the Southeast corner of the Washington County Government Center Campus. See attached "At a Glance" project overview describing the need within the community, the proposed services, and building program. PREVIOUS SUBMITTALS The EHSB project was submitted to the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization (MSCWMO) on April 18, 2024 and will be presented at the May 91h, 2024 Board meeting. Preliminary guidance provided by the MSCWMO informed the proposed design shown in this submittal. Following the MSCWMO review, additional comments related to documenting the grading improvements within the 40' bluff setback may be provided. The project was also submitted to the City of Oak Park Heights for Utility review concurrently with the MSCWMO submittal. A drainage permit application will be submitted to MnDOT within the next few weeks. PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTALS Washington County is pursuing a Zoning Map Amendment and Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment of the Government Center campus to adjust existing lot lines to incorporate an undesignated parcel of land at the Southeast corner of the site into the main campus parcel. As part of the larger parcel, which is zoned as Public Administrative Office (PA District), the proposed project site would have two deviations from the existing PUD requirements. 1) The project would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) allowing for residential development within the PA District. As a residential development, the EHSB project would follow the zoning requirements PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN / LHBCORP.COM MEMORANDUM: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING APRIL 24, 2024 PAGE 2 for the Medium Density Multiple -Family Residential District Regulations (RCM) in lieu of the Public Administrative Office currently assigned to the entirety of the campus. 2) The project provides 16 parking stalls in a new surface lot on site. The project would deviate from the required parking standards of the existing PUD by providing fewer stalls than required. A Shared Parking Agreement will be prepared by the City Attorney allowing for the use of the adjacent Government Center parking lot as overflow parking for the EHS Building. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN ELEMENTS The Emergency Housing Services Building will include numerous sustainable design elements ranging from large scale site design down to the products selected for use within the building. These features include: - Project utilizes infiltration to retain site stormwater runoff. - Project provides pretreatment for stormwater runoff through the use of grassed swales and proprietary stormwater treatment structure. - Native prairie grass and plant selections - Low input of turf grasses - Bicycle parking - Energy efficient windows - Solar ready for future photovoltaic system integration - Energy efficient wall assemblies including continuous exterior insulation - Energy efficient roof insulation - High efficiency LED lighting, automatic lighting controls/occupancy sensors - High efficiency mechanical systems and programmable thermostats - Water efficient low flow plumbing fixtures - Low VOC finishes and adhesives Attachments: - Plan Review Submittal Narrative, dated 04/24/2024 - Washington County EHSB "At a Glance" Project Overview - Land Use Application, dated 04/24/2024 - Property Information (Deed, Title, Survey) - Parcel Description, Word Document - Plan Review Submittal Drawings, dated 04/24/2024 c: LHB Project No. 210890 m:\21 proj\210890\300 design\regulatory\city zoning & planning\city planning\site plan review\20240418 submittal\210890 20240424 plan review submittal narrative.docx Washington .=County At A Glance EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 04/12/2024 As housing costs rise, more people are left without stable homes. Emergency housing Washington County is faced with creating emergency housing for adults without options to combat the growing homelessness crisis. Without enough emergency housing, people face increased vulnerability. We urgently children need more housing to support our community members. Snapshot of current hotel -based program (data collection beginning April 2020) All people in Washington County deserve a safe and dignified place to live. Recognizing the importance of emergency housing in fostering a caring community, Washington County is proud to announce the upcoming Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB) on the Government Center campus. 271 Total individuals served 140 O BIPOC 85 Caucasian 35 % Ages 55+ 66 % Recieved support for a disability 45 O O Accessed stable housing "It's hard to maintain full-time employment if you don't have shelter at all. You have no place to take a shower, no way to cook any food before going to work. Struggling while homeless and working all at the same time is a struggle all in itself." —James How does Washington County compare? Despite the increase in emergency housing capacity for individuals post -pandemic, Washington County remains behind for individuals when compared to other Minnesota counties. Due to lack of adequate emergency housing in Washington County, more than 70 of our residents had to seek shelter in neighboring counties. Permanent emergency housing capacity for adults without children 0 20 45 66 500 824 Washington Scott/Carver Dakota Anoka Ramsey Hennepin This project is different from a traditional "shelter" Washington County commits to providing dignity for individuals experiencing homelessness and delivering professional support to help them move toward the stability of housing. The Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building includes: : Around -the -clock staffing, improving access to support services for residents to HOURS: accommodate their jobs and schedules. . The opportunity to stay with loved ones; adult households may stay together. Pets can stay with the household to provide comfort and companionship. Possessions are welcome. Residents can avoid losing their belongings, causing less stress as their personal items are kept safe and secure. Convenient access to an array of services such as economic assistance, connection to jobs, social service support, help in finding housing and gathering important documents, and health and well-being support. Emergency housing will include individual rooms and bathrooms and will be trauma - informed, gender -inclusive, and integrated into the community in order to provide a safe, dignified space for residents. A thoughtful design • 30 private rooms and bathrooms (4 on the first floor and 26 on the second floor) • Professionally staffed 24/7 (by contracted service provider) • On -site computer lab to aid in job search/development • Commercial kitchen and large shared dining area (meals and snacks provided on -site) • Storage space • On -site parking • ADA accessibility First floor plan Carnnrl flnnr nlan "I think the main thing this gives someone is hope, and a sense of security. There's nothing like having a room you can go into and lock the door and lay down in a bed and, you know, feel secure" — Terri & Kory Tentative project timeline City approvals and building permit review Spring 2024 Summer 2024 Ground breaking Project cost • Total estimated cost = $12 million • Washington County funds = $7 million • Funding still needed = $5 million These are our neighbors, our friends ... ov• a We are here to help those in need in our communities- help them heal, grow and thrive in secure and dignified ways. To understand the true mission of this project, • please scan the QR code at right and watch a video of our neighbors sharing their a lived experiences with homelessness. Stay in the know For additional information and updates on the project, visit https://co.washington.mn.us/EHSB or contact EmergencyHousing@co.washington.mn.us "What I would like people to know about homelessness is there are many out there like me who are one paycheck away. One twist of fate can bring you to a spot you never thought you'd be" — Iver Revised 12/27/23 City of Oak Park Heights 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N • Oak Park Heghts, MN 55082 • Phone (651) 439-0439 • Fax (651) 43M574 April 26, 2024 Mr. John Dybvig, Chair City of Stillwater Planning Commission 216 41 Street N. Stillwater, MN 55082 RE: Washington County's Emergency Housing Services Building Dear Chair Dybvig: At the March 12, Oak Park Heights City Council meeting, representatives from Washington County provided an overview of their proposed Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB). As you are probably aware, the EHSB is being proposed within the City of Stillwater on the southern portion of the Washington County Government Center campus. Given that the proposed project is generally surrounded by properties located within Oak Park Heights and the subject property itself is served by Oak Park Heights water and sewer utilities, both residents and City Council members had questions and input to provide regarding the proposed project. Subsequently, I had the opportunity to meet with your Community Development Director Tim Gladhill to discuss some of the questions and concerns that were brought up at the March 12 meeting. With the understanding that the EHSB will be required to go through the City of Stillwater's zoning entitlement process, the City of Oak Park Heights is respectfully requesting that certain conditions be added to the project if the EHSB is ultimately approved. These conditions included the following: 1. The EHSB shall be staffed 24 hours per day, 7 days per week by a qualified Washington County employee and/or third -party contractor. 2. The EHSB use shall fully comply with the City of Stillwater's parking requirements. 3. The EHSB utility plan shall be subject to review and written approval by the Oak Park Heights City Engineer. 4. Any future expansion to the number of beds within the EHSB shall require a public hearing and an amendment to the CUP and/or PUD. Thank you for your review of the EHSB application and, if approved, consideration of our recommended conditions. Respectfully, J)co Riff e City Administrator CC: Joe Kohlmann, City Administrator (via email only) Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director (via email only) Ben Gutknecht, Planning Manager (via email only) TREE CITY U.S.A. Valley 1* 1911 Curve Crest Blvd. West I Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 1 651-430-2739 1 www.valleyoutreachmn.org Outreach Dear City of Stillwater Planning Commission, I am sending this note of support for Washington County's Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB) Project in Stillwater on behalf of Valley Outreach. As a long-time partner with Washington County in homelessness prevention work and serving unhoused people through our programs, we know this new facility will address an urgent need for community members. People must have a safe, dignified place to stay temporarily while they find stable housing, work, and other resources to help move their lives forward. Valley Outreach currently supports people experiencing homelessness through our programs and in partnership with current emergency housing providers. We believe this new facility will benefit the community and look forward to working with the team at the EHSB to coordinate services for people in need. We recently became a subgrantee for the County for the Family Homelessness Prevention and Assistance Program (FHPAP) because finding stable housing is a top need for people participating in our Client Support Services program. In the last fiscal year, before receiving FHPAP grant dollars, we helped 216 households with rent, deposits, and utilities. It only takes one bad day — an unexpected medical event, a job loss, a broken car — to push many families and individuals out of their homes. We believe that this work is more important than ever as the number of people experiencing homelessness in Washington County has increased steadily and significantly over the past three years according to state Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) data. The EHSB, while a temporary stop for people experiencing homelessness, can also be the first stop to a life of greater stability and security. Let's make it better. Together. On behalf of the Valley Outreach staff team and Board of Directors, �24t m al.N Tracy Maki Chief Executive Officer Tracy.maki@valleyoutreachmn.org 651-342-5560 Charities Councll- MEETS STAND DS s—rtgmers.org @valleyoutreach ocoo® May 15, 2024 Dear City of Stillwater, FIRST P RE S BYT E RIAN CHURCH I am writing this letter in my role as the chair of the Mission Ministry Team of the First Presbyterian Church (FPC) of Stillwater in support of the Washington County's Emergency Housing Services Building project. First Presbyterian Church is located directly across the street from the Washington County Government Center and the countyjail. As a result, we interact with many people struggling with emergency housing insecurity, especially individuals. Our location has made our church realize the huge need for emergency housing. Recently, we had to pay for a Lyft driver to take a homeless woman to Bemidji, the closest shelter that could accommodate her. She was one of numerous homeless Washington County residents that had to seek shelter outside of our county. Although Washington County has no permanent emergency housing capacity for adults without children, the need for such housing is tremendous and often not recognized by the public. FPC has been privileged to host the PIT (Point in Time count) Stop event in cooperation with Washington County, other local churches, and many non profits three times since January, 2023. We look forward to continuing to host future PIT Stop events that provide one stop support and resources to those in need, especially those experiencing homelessness. The Washington County Emergency Housing Services Building's proposed location will allow their clients to conveniently access these supportive events. Having reviewed the plans for the building and its proposed management, as close neighbors of the facility, we feel very comfortable that this project will meet great humanitarian needs in the community and have a significant positive impact without putting the safety of Stillwater residents at any significant risk. Thus, we would strongly support the City of Stillwater recognizing the importance of the project to help it come to fruition. Sincerely, Leonard Snellman, MD, Chair, Mission Ministry Team First Presbyterian Church of Stillwater, MN FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 6201 OSGOOD AVE. N., STILLWATER, MN 55082 (651) 439-4380 1 CHURCH@FPC-STILLWATER.ORG I WWWFPC-STILLWATER.ORG May 15, 2024 Dear Members of the Planning Commission, FIRST P RE S BYT E RIAN CHURCH I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for Washington County's planned Emergency Housing Services Building. I have been a resident of Stillwater and the pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Stillwater for nearly 12 years. Our church property is less than 1200 feet from the proposed site, and my home is less than a mile away on Churchill Street. Our congregation is very supportive of this project because it will fulfill a critical need in our community, and it aligns with our church's vision that all people in our community should be able to thrive in their lives. Nearly every week, we encounter individuals or families at our church who are in need of emergency housing. Most have recently lost their housing and lack the resources or support to get their lives back on track. While there are several agencies in our community that provide some assistance, the waiting list for emergency housing is extremely long. Our community simply doesn't have enough beds for emergency housing, so we end up sending vulnerable people to other counties. Several times in the last few months, I've had to send guests on a Lyft ride a few counties away —one as far as Bemidji. I imagine that some city residents are resistant to this proposal because of safety concerns, but I do not share these concerns. To the contrary, I believe shifting the emergency housing away from hotels in the business district will improve safety for our community and for those being housed. Dozens of people are currently housed in these hotels along the highway, where there is no security nearby and no case management staff present 24/7. This setup has provided an opportunity for these vulnerable residents to be victimized by criminals. The proposed location for the Emergency Housing Services Building on the campus of the Washington County Government Center —in close proximity to the Homeless Services Outreach Team (HOST), community services office, and Sheriff's Department —will provide the security, support, and services these individuals need to get back on their feet and thrive again in their lives. I encourage you to approve the construction of the Housing Services Building because it will benefit our entire community, especially those who are vulnerable and need our support the most. Sincerely, Rev. Cader Howard Pastor FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 6201 OSGOOD AVE. N., STILLWATER, MN 55082 (651) 439-4380 1 CHURCH@FPC-STILLWATER.ORG I WWWFPC-ST[LLWATER.ORG 5/1/24 As a Stillwater resident, I am writing to express my full support for the establishment of a 30-unit emergency shelter for those experiencing homelessness in Stillwater, Minnesota. This initiative holds profound significance not only for those directly affected by homelessness but for the entire community as well. As a provider of supportive housing services, I have long hoped to see Washinton Country come to value the need to further the affordable housing continuum. Homelessness is a complex issue that demands a multifaceted response. By providing a dedicated shelter with 30 units, we can offer a safe and stable environment for individuals and families experiencing homelessness. This shelter would not only offer temporary housing but also access to essential services such as counseling, job training, and healthcare, enabling residents to regain their footing and work towards a brighter future. Furthermore, a homeless shelter can significantly alleviate the strain on emergency services and resources in the community. By providing a centralized location for individuals in need, we can reduce instances of street homelessness, emergency room visits, and interactions with law enforcement. This not only benefits those experiencing homelessness but also enhances public safety and well-being for all residents of Stillwater. I understand that there may be concerns from some members of the community regarding the establishment of a homeless shelter. However, it's important to recognize that homelessness is not a choice, but rather a systemic issue that requires compassionate and practical solutions. By coming together to support this initiative, we demonstrate our commitment to building a more inclusive and supportive community for all. I urge you to consider the profound impact that a 30-unit homeless shelter could have on the lives of our most vulnerable neighbors and on the fabric of our community as a whole. Let us stand together in solidarity, compassion, and empathy, as we work towards a future where everyone has a place to call home. Sincerely Sara Riegle, Stillwater Resident RENDERING IMAGE n C PROJECT TEAM STATE MAP CLIENT WASHINGTON COUNTY 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, ON 55082 PHONE: (651) 430-6225 CONTACT: GREG WOOD DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SERVICES E-MAIL: GREG.WOOD@CO.WASHINGTON.MN.US ARCHITECT LHB, INC. 701 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PHONE: (612) 766-2852 CONTACT: EMILY TIMM E-MAIL: EMILY.TIMM@LHBCORP.COM LOCATION MAP B n A M M N CV O N N PROJECT MANAGER WASHINGTON COUNTY CDA 7645 CURRELL BOULEVARD WOODBURY, ON 55125 PHONE: (651) 379-9358 CONTACT: KRISTEN SCOBIE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISANT DIRECTOR E-MAIL: KRISTENS@WASHINGTONCOUNTYCDA.ORG STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MATTSON MACDONALD YOUNG, INC 105 5TH AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PHONE: (612) 827-7825 CONTACT: KEN GREEN E-MAIL: KENG@MMYENG.COM CIVIL ENGINEER LHB, INC. 21 WEST SUPERIOR STREET SUITE 500 DULUTH, ON 55802 PHONE: (218) 727-8446 CONTACT: ADAM BESSE E-MAIL: ADAM.BESSE@LHBCORP.COM MECHANICAL ENGINEER CAIN THOMAS ASSOCIATES, INC. 3433 BROADWAY STREET NE SUITE 475 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 PHONE: (612) 279-4200 CONTACT: RYAN STEPHANS E-MAIL: RSTEPHANS@CTAMEP.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LHB, INC. 701 WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PHONE: (612) 581-0850 CONTACT: LYDIA MAJOR E-MAIL: LYDIA.MAJOR@LHBCORP.COM ELECTRICAL ENGINEER CAIN THOMAS ASSOCIATES, INC. 3433 BROADWAY STREET NE SUITE 475 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 PHONE: (612) 279-4200 CONTACT: DAVE CARLSON-MCLAGAN E-MAIL: DCARLSON@CTAMEP.COM COUNTY CENTER, ON EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 14949 62ND ST N, STILLWATER, MN 55082 SHEET INDEX A000 PROJECT TITLE SHEET R1 SITE SURVEY L001 RENDERED SITE PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN AND NOTES L501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS C001 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE C101 REMOVALS AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C102 PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL PLAN C201 UTILITY PLAN C202 UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM PLAN C301 GRADING PLAN C302 GRADING ENLARGMENT C401 SITE PLAN C501 CIVIL DETAILS C502 CIVIL DETAILS C503 CIVIL DETAILS C504 CIVIL DETAILS C505 CIVIL DETAILS C506 CIVIL DETAILS C511 ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS C512 MNDOT STANDARD PLANS AND STANDARD PLATE C513 MNDOT STANDARD PLANS AND STANDARD PLATE C514 MNDOT STANDARD PLANS AND STANDARD PLATE A001 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A002 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A003 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - TRASH ENCLOSURE & SITE SIGNAGE E101 ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC E102 ELECTRICAL SITE CUTS E103 ELECTRICAL SITE CUTS 41 LHr 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD., WOODBURY, MN 55125 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 01 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION `��NpRy RED- S�R� EORo6 yj1% COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT TITLE SHEET DRAWN BY: XXX CHECKED BY: XXX PROJ. NO: 210890 AOOO DRAWING NO: 1 2 3 4 5 Trash Enclosure Patio Space With Seating Monument Sign Bike Rack (9 Stalls) Patio Space With Seating' Open Lawn Recreation4'-0" Tall Metal Fence Proposed Building 6'-0" Tall Metal Fence Mulched Dog Area i Waste Receptical Picnic Shelter With Seating 0 J 0 '6IEa: LANDSCAPE NOTES GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES: PLANT MATERIAL 1. THIS DRAWING DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFICIAL SURVEY OF THE SITE. CONFIRM ALL 12. PLANT TREE ROOT BALLS FLUSH WITH FINAL GRADE AND THE TOP OF ROOT FLARE LOCATIONS OF SURFACE AND SUB -SURFACE FEATURES BEFORE BEGINNING INSTALLATION. EXPOSED, PER PLANTING DETAILS. ADVISE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 13. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING 2. CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES, SHAPES, AND LOCATIONS OF LANDSCAPE AREAS, AND ADJUST TO BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONFORM TO THE SITE CONDITIONS. CONFIRM ANY ADJUSTMENTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE 14. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE ARCHITECT. DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY. 3. VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO DIGGING. NOTIFY THE 15. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH PLANT INSTALLATION. STOCK", ANSI-Z60. LATEST EDITION, OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE 16. HEEL IN AND WATER ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DELIVERY UNTIL THE WORK SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. SCHEDULE. 17. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER PLANTING 5. REFER TO SECTION 312323 FILL FOR SOIL REQUIREMENTS. DO NOT BEGIN PLANTING ACCESSORIES. OPERATIONS IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE NOT AS SPECIFIED. 6. REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL TURF WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR NEW PLANT BEDS. MAINTENANCE AND CARE LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE IS NOT ALLOWED. THE PLAN 18. BEGIN PLANT MAINTENANCE IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. ADVISE 19. MAINTENANCE INCLUDES WATERING, WEEDING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. PRIOR TO GROWING SEASON, RE -SETTING PLANTS AND PROPER GRADE, AND KEEPING 7. STAKE TREE AND PLANTING BED LAYOUT IN -FIELD FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. PRIOR TO PLANTING OPERATIONS. 20. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE, AND WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. PROTECTIONS 8. AVOID DAMAGING EXISTING TREES. DO NOT STORE OR DRIVE HEAVY MATERIALS OVER TREE ROOTS. DO NOT DAMAGE TREE BARK OR BRANCHES. 9. KEEP PAVEMENTS, FIXTURES AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES WILL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. KEEP THE PROJECT SITE CLEAR OF CONSTRUCTION WASTES AND DEBRIS. 10. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN INLET AND PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMPS AS SPECIFIED ON CIVIL SHEETS. 11. ALL AREAS OF THE SITE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL BE RESTORED WITH SEED OR SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR TURF RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1"=20' 0) BIKE RACK (9 STALLS) UTILITY STRUCTURE, SEE CIVIL s W� PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SYMBOL QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT TREES GROUND COVERS Coniferous Tree _ _ _ _ _ 1,170 sf Detention Basin Seed Mix 11 Pinus strobus / White Pine 6' HT Juniperus virginiana / Eastern Red Cedar 858 sf Hardwood Mulch / 6" Deep Mulch Landscape Bed / Shrubs & Perennials 4' O.C. Decidous Canopy Tree Aronia melanocarpa 'Autumn Magic' / Autumn Magic Black Gleditsia triacanthos inermis'lmpcole' / Imperial Honey Locust Chokeberry Gymnocladus diocicus'UMNSYnergy' TM / Kentucky True North D Diervilla lonicera / Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle • 17 Coffeetree 2-1/2" B&B D �, D 5,176 sf Spiraea betulifolia 'Tor Gold' TM / Glow Girl Birchleaf Spirea #2 CONT Ostrya virginiana / American Hophornbeam Sporobolus heterolepis / Prairie Dropseed Quercus Ellipsoidalis / Northern Pin Oak Schizachyrium scoparium 'Minnblue A' / Blue Heaven Little Bluestem Tilia americana' McKSentry' /American Sentry Linden Bouteloua gracilis 'Honeycomb'/ Honeycomb Blue Grama Grass Ornamental Tree � 2,737 sf Low Maintenance Turf Seed 25 Amelancheir x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance' / Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry o o o ° 265 sf Rock Mulch Maintenance Edger Mulch Maackia amurensis 'Summertime' / Summertime Maackia 31,523 sf Short Prairie Native Seed Mix Seed Mix W W W 15,461 sf Turf Seed Seed WARNING LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CALL BEFORE DIGGING MINNESOTA ONE -CALL SYSTEM 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY MN STATUTE 216D 64' TALL METAL FENCE, TYP 4'-0" TALL METAL FENCE DOG WASTE BIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP 0 10, 20' 40' 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 2001 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD. WOODBURY, MN 55125 RE�,�MNNp��oN J41f4.000 �Zp2Q THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 1 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN AND NOTES DRAWN BY: KAT CHECKED BY: LAM PROJ. NO: 21MSPP Ll 00 DRAWING NO. U i - v� ✓yl /VV_/mLL7' `i / IIVV=O/.7./ IV JYY CD 6� \ 1 CQJ � I �\ \--h- - \ \ 890 19 INW V ��zl -�� — -� IrIIV=8 2.2 Wj � \ \ I \ o, — — �, T R E S \ c� \ \ \ o � gyp_ I \ / / \ PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT 1 i - \ 889 - _ R A S S - -,, I - v , 3*'��01-lel I 20 jO M P L \ \ /� \ o \ - - v BXI \ / \ \ DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASIN %12' \ JJ \ - V / 7 PR / 18� I i - \ GRDL---g81' �` --- \\\ REMOVE STOP SIGN- 887 w I GWV Cd I I W iP��—I—�I,� t�j�J �I I \ \ �� ti — al4' l 8,� \ \ \ \ \ -� — / I I CANOPY I / L-LI / INLET PROTECTION, TYP. / / COco co � 0-3 M PLUG AND ABANDON EXISTING — 875, i d� \ \ \ \ / z I GfDL - PROTECT EXISTING RETAINING WALL STORM SEWER AND STRUCTURE / _ PROTECT EXISTING POWER POLE AND POWER LINES / WV / REMOVE ±21 LF STORM SEWER / / \ GRDL 0 1 / - WO-pyE g7�- ��T��� =o o o `o 0 / AND CATCH BASIN 0 \ L - - - - J SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) AND / / CON CR�TE WALL / / , , \ , / REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT • • ' ' ' '''''•'•' ' REMOVE ±5 LF STORM SEWER �' \ ) ^ ag5 � l� ----884---� --883- OC _ % uo / / -6 M P - AND CATCH BASIN �6 -877- - �, \ / ±845 - SILT FENCE ; ; ; ;.;.;.;.;.;.; ; ; ; ; / �� - - _ - - - " - - 878 - - - - - SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT :/.' _ .' ' '.' / - / , r PPT - 886 • -.'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.L' g'..............................................................................................'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.. ''.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.......... 8�9. \ \ 1�g...... \ \ \ / SMH - N�= $ gip' .............. �'..........'... 1.......4.Q.'............ ......... ....... ............ .... .......... . �. .........—...'.'...'.'...'.'.......................... . '/...�'.'.'........./. �; • o . rol�s�s. \ \ TOP=884.8 . \............'!'.................................................................................................................................................................y� �. \ \ \ I INV879.5 N,N.................................................................................................................. \ \ _ ........................................................................................................................................... ................... ........ INV 879.7(E) ... �;. "�.......................................................................... �.. ................ REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT \ -.'' .$�A............................................................................ .. ..................................................................... .... \.''':...........................................................................................:' B:':'I'::T::'!:':�I':':I:':'A}:':':':l':'S:'..................'.'�� ' ............... .'................................................. ... \ \ '...................................................................................................................................................1�. .................... \ O ..........................................................................................'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. \ \ \ \ \ 885 - — 885 — I ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) AND o \'6� 8"°ELM8"� ..�'�.��., i` \ \ \ \ I REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT AND REMOVE HYD o p \ \ \ 1 / CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER O RB I SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) AND Y L/, REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER \J MP QP I /\ 0 v O-�� REMOVE TREE - - - J APR REMOVE TREE * * * 1 L* Lk;:;:;:;::;:;:;:;$;;S-b?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;' ;;; ;;;; ; \ \ \\ \ \ �j \\ \ r J \ \ \ REMOVE TREE.......... 7�1 \ \ �8 I {.............................. \ CLEAR AND GRUB TREES REMOVE HYDRANT REMOVE TREE _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _� ,8 83 \ \ \ I 887.60 �� _ _ _ — -s8o �881- 82, \ \ \� QK I;:;:;;;;;..;..;.;...;.;...;....;.I.;.; .;.:. ;. ...................... ''.... -8 \ REMOVE TREE g \ \ \ \ -877Qh',ERt6tANG'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.;.;.;.. \ \ I I \ \ \ - \ \\ ti I O / / / j /, j i j - 876 - 875 - \ \ \ \ o :':':':':':': ....... ' ....':':'. - - 874- - - - _ - - \ \ �\ \ \ \ % LM x I :;:;:;:... :.:.::::: -873- - - \ \ \ \ 2\ EL \ . ;.;.;.;.;.;.;.'.'. I E I \ \ \ —s72— —� ��� �� �� \ \ \ ��3 \ .. EXISTING I I I I I I - I ��%� / / / / / / /i'/� — 2" SH \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ :;;;;;;;;;;;;; BUILDING ;;;;;;;... ;•;•'•'•;• I I I I I I \\\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ K ... I I I I I I / / REMOVE TREE \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ....... ......T.. SAWCUT (FULL DEPTH) AND / / / / / / // \ I I REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT / / / / // / // \ \\ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \ o OVERHANG / � I I I T E El S I // REMOVE RIPRAP `I \ I I I I I II I I I �✓ v / // / / / / / /// �/ / / FFS \ \\ \ \\ REMOVE TREE o 3 ELM I j REMOVE BUILDING AND I I I ` ••• • \ � / / / / / / / REMOVE ±50 LF STORM SEWER � � \ \ � \ $ B 05 \ ASSOCIATED FOOTING ��o I AND FLARED END FILL SITE DEPRESSION. I\ \ I I I I I 0 A I I I I I ROCK -� 124" RCP ,Sr S> ( ) RCP SEE GRADING PLAN I I I \ I I I I I I I � // I I I \ } I CONSTRUCTION > I I I o.. POP REMOVE TREE AND SPECIFCATIONS. I I 1 1 I I 1 ENTRANCE I, > I I I I III 1 1 I I I I I I I I o -\ I REMOVE TREE I I I I I \ I C A T TA L S TSKIMMER .3 :•:' �00 I I I I _I ..I ,.- INV=868.0 III I I I ► i I I _� I I 11 I\\ I I I TOP OF WEIR=868.8 I I yP \ B CI8 \ 11 I, I I I r - 4 REMOVE ±9 LF STORM SEWER * * * * I* *1 / I o I / \ 1 REMOVE TREE AND OVERFLOW STRUCTURE / - I I I SP �S,;, REMOVE TREE 14 L w /' I / I I I /\ RCP Sr S 24 o I 11 \ \ WATER ELEV$FN = 870.3 // //I I I I I$ I-04/ / I I I I \ I \ I FEET IN OCT, 2023 // / / "O / REMOVE TREE I \ I \ I \ \ \ ° \ 40' BLUFF LINE SETBACK CLEAR AND GRUB TREES //// / $ B 09 / I I I I"O MF�L -----------------� 1— 31* \ �- -� �� / -- f---��-----� ---- - -�I--- - 4 ASP In I I % �"I REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE 872-_Vi°OAK —87— a12MPL REMOVETREEI I \ \ PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION AT -�� - 88 _ / �oELM� \ - - - - _ _ 8�6 �' �� / / / / / REMOVE TREE I / I �� / I �� I �� / -� / - / I 0 DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASIN BM # 2 — RR -� 3 \ \ _ _— _ — — — — I / / I I c 2 ASH CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REMOVE TREE, / ,/� I 4�1/ I I �� z �I.., ` 3 "o OAK GW — SPIKE _ ��� / \ E _ _- - - - 877 - - - / / I REMOVE TREE / \ / 1_/ \ \ - -879 87g _ _ - ��' 1 / REMOVE FENCE IX 24„ / \ - APPROXIMATE HI HWAY EMBANKMENT EDGE - „° �� ° ; ��88�88o— - /�4' $a2 �/ 2-'o6R�46-_ ----- -I - - --_ 4 i 5 POP 1----------- CO o N / -----� a�'� 881 - - I �_ - - - - - �� � ° _ o o /I _/ 511 L 'orFz� _ - �EOL S_Mt-- WV 5"MP80 L- o o -_ -- ----- ° _ _ _ �` I _i —_� _ - - - - 8 - �o1P� -_ _-�"-PttV� - "�P� - - - - — - - T - _ _ _ _ 3" °�� - _ _ IAA � _ E �I -- 78- 3- - - ��_--PP- -_� - - ------ ° --5 �7L-M------- ---- ------ - - --- 3�414__- "°'AI4- - _?fir _--__ -�-_ 9_E-L _------------ ------ --- - - - -- _ - - METAL RAIL ------- _--------- - --* I—81-7�I --� ---� _ --_W _ -- ---�__ - -� =87 '=T _ A� _ ___ --- 874- _ _ ________ �' ----__--- -FQL GN--P=876.9 ----- - ------873-------__----- - - _------------- - ----868-867 g66---_- \ �� - ---- ------ 3" rvT INV=851.9------- --------871-------- - — ' a- \ - -�--- -----------TAP��7U.$- - 'XCNT� — ---- "W�C�OME TO��� - ------ _ _ _ _ — -- - -869- IN 8 5 ------------------- T =�-- - - - --- -- -- f/r�MINNESA��I\N ���---_----------------------- _--- ---- 868--- IRtt/�85f�S - ------ ----- -_� - _ - -`rI-� �"sE '2"°OAK / / �� --- ------ ---------- -__--------- ----- 867 --_ -- // / \��--- CONCRET�WACC m ---- - -- -- -_t--- _ -866 _ — — ----- -------- _----Q-- _ _ #�'L ---_ - --_ -- / - „o -866- a2-EL-bF- -------------- �- - -- - "-------- -_�{-_ _ ___-_-_-_---__--,oEL-_--__- // o- HF T I-- _ — --- �4 - --- --- _---- --_- — �L WtNTT— _ - =---I- ---- - _------852-=-;r> EROSION CONTROL NOTES SHEET NOTES LEGEND 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROL ON THIS PROJECT. THE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. CONSTRUCT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AS SHOWN AND AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT THE RUNOFF, TRACKING OR LOSS OF SOIL MATERIALS FROM DISTURBED AREAS ON THE PROJECT SITE. 2. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE FUNCTIONAL BEFORE ANY LAND IS OTHERWISE DISTURBED ON THE SITE. 3. THE SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE THE MINIMUM. ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DRIVES SHALL BE SWEPT CLEAR AS NEEDED TO KEEP THE PAVEMENT CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY ON SITE AND PROTECT SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTY FROM CONCRETE WASHOUT RUNOFF. EROSION CONTROL QUANITIES DEVICE MEA QTY SILT FENCE LF 1045 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 1 INLET PROTECTION EA 12 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 2861 TURF ESTABLISHMENT SF L101 REFER TO SHEETS C101-1021 L101 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL PERMITS FOR ALL WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING. SEE PROJECT MANUAL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PROJECT LOCATION WITH SITE INTERFACES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, EXISTING GRADES AND PROPOSED GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO EXECUTING THE WORK. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF FIELD CONDITIONS VARY FROM THE PLAN. 4. ALL BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS SHALL BE SAW CUT TO A NEAT LINE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY NEW MATERIAL AGAINST EXISTING EDGES. 5. REMOVE ALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TO NEAREST EXISTING JOINT. PARTIAL PANEL REPLACEMENT IS NOT PERMITTED. ANY PANEL DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE FULLY REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 6. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED STRUCTURE ACCESS COVERS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISHED GRADE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING PAVEMENTS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. ANY PAVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 8. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARKING LOT AT ALL TIMES. 9. REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL AND ORGANICS, BRUSH, SHRUBS, AND TREES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PRIOR TO SUBGRADE PREPARATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DRAWINGS. TOPSOIL THICKNESS VARIES. 10. REFER TO SHEET C102 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TO BE INSTALLED AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF SITE FEATURES. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL 1/C401 o SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL 2/C401 r n LJ INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL 310501 GTREE PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL 8/C402 .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT ti , . REMOVE TREE CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING TREES REMOVE GRAVEL SURFACE WARNING LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CALL BEFORE DIGGING MINNESOTA ONE —CALL SYSTEM 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY MN STATUTE 216D 4Ii L H 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD. WOODBURY, MN 55125 Ry �Np �oN o�zQzp2Q THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 1 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION HEREBY CERTIFY that this plan, specifica- tion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SIGNATURE: -""`- TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: ADAM BESSE DATE: 04/24/2024 REG. NO.: 52597 COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: REMOVALS AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWN BY: DPG CHECKED BY:BJH PROJ. NO: 210890 C1 01 DRAWING NO: 2 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS GW 3 "o OAK _ \ _ I 1- � - �, - 2='OGRAB __--�j' - - - - h - 879 - -GW-- _ - - METAL RAID 3 T. "WE-LQOME T0� - - -_- - - _- /'�MINNESCTA. SIGN CONCRETI7__VPACC m _ 2:2�iiv�`",I 00 � \ �\ \ ��o, �' -_ ��� T R E� S \\ �- ,o 0-3 1 1 1 20)jO MPL\' , \ J BX Igo _ \ \\ \ �_+ N \ J A LH8 co wvI /`�' I W �P�-II 3 t�_�. I �� I I ��'� l \ �8��\ �\\ fl- co -09 I HYDRANT ASSEMBY / / co CO 0 3 0M 'ER WV SEE DETAIL 5/C504 / / / / / / '01_0 r / '� '� =9 \ \ \ 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.338.2029 RM y / / / CON CRkTE WALL l yE� - 812� i CB-08 -876- I - \ �6�' \ \\ J > CLIENT: - _ _ �a33 RIM = 878.60 -877- - �8)) /' COG 1.88 D GF� - - _�� _�� s LP ` IE=870.32 ____-\ \ 1 I ; , / WASHINGTON COUNTY r DOT 21RCP---------_--�i_� -__�- r1_� o �, -_-� -�___ _moo moo\ o �o o \ 1 1 �� , , �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 00 \ \ \ �\ :� 7- + 9.� ` \ \ \ �// �\/ /' AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD. \ \ 884 - - _ 884' \ \ \ `. \ �, \ / '� +\ l \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ CV \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �, WOODBURY, MN 55125 SEE SHEET C302 FOR THE UNDERGROUND > > \ > o1161 885- _ INFILTRATION SYSTEM PLAN \ \ \ FES-07 \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ \ \ \ IE = 868.00 \ 7 883 PAVEMENT DRAINTILE _ _ - _ _ _ \ \ PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL \ SEE DETAIL 7/C503 - - - - _ 6" SANITARY CLEANOUT� ` \ MNDOT STD. PLATE 3131C \ _ 876 - - - - ±282.0 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00%MIN. n❑ _ o \ \ I 1 IE - 871.00 \ - 75 RIM = 880.93 \ _ > > >_ - / -874 ----IE=876.09\\ �` > I 1M 1 \ \ +4.3LF6"PVC �\\ �- - 72 SANITARY SERVICE LINE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 83 /44/ 0 2.00% \ \ \ \ \ o ±109.2 LF 6" PVC SANITARY SERVICE @ 1.00 /o @ \ \ \ / I I I N �- I I � I I 1 I I ` VCR ±95.8 LF 4" HDPE 1 \ \. \ .� \ \ \ \ \ 1 � / / I � / I / WATER SERVICE LINED v \ \ \ � T F El S 1 CONNECT TO BUILDING SEWER ' \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ �'�q' ^ F AQZ IE = 876.18 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ 1 I C� 1 CO I PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 41?,4I ` RMAIN, / / i / / I / \ \ � \ \ \ ' 1 MNDOT STD. PLATE 3131C i JG TEE / / / / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I 1 ' \ > 1 IE = 871.00 1 / CONNECT TO BUILDING WATER \ 1 1/C504 I I I I 1\ 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 IE = 874.00 1 1 I (v.I.F.) )X J b 0 0 0 a o ±26.7 LF -12" HDPE @ 1.00% 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 \ 1 I I I I I I I I i 1 I 1 1 i I I J I 1 / I 1 1 OCS-06 I CB-04 CB-10 CB-11 I I RIM = 880.25 RIM = 879.50 I I 1 1 � I 1 1 I RIM = 879.50 i 1 I I 1 1 I RIM = 869.80 / 1 )RM IE = 876.06 (E,S) IE = 876.71 I I I I MH-05 1 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ;506 \\ ±5.6 LF 12" HDPE @ 1.00% IE = 876.44 I�%� I RIM = 875.00 1 1 ���11 \ IE = 868.03 / 1 ON FULL SIZE SHEETS >-.0% 1 I I IE = 867.90 \ I 1 h ±38.2 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% / I I ±341.5 LF 8" PVC @ 1.00%MIN. 1, INLET \ i �. � , ` < < > > >�> >+-I > > >--I--r-r> 368.70 \ �� ±180.1 LF 12" HDPE @ 0.50% - - - - - - ET IN OCT 2023 / < < < < C�-< < < < �` �� 1 1 % ` \ \ / ±26.1 LF -12 HDPE @ 0.50 /o -869 MH-02 _ RIM=880.38---------- _ ' \I \ \\ � _ MH-01 i � `- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 1 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL IE 12"= 875.76 (E) � \ \ CB-03 , // / / /' MANHOLE PLACED ON EXISTING s\ i I - -j � IE 24"= 869.86 (N) \ \ \ W/ PRETREATMENT \ i i POND OUTLET PIPE / / / ql�'1 \ r. � NO DATE ISSUED FOR \ \ �\ �\ 8� �� � i' / RIM=880.04 \ / / _ / / 1 d' \ LF 12" HDPE @ 2.00% II \\ \ \ SEE 1/C506 \ _ _ _ _ - _ -872_ - - �i 8 / / / / /EXIST IE = 866.77 (S) (FIELD VERIFY) \ ✓' / / I ' /' / I 2" / \ RIM =880.16 \ _- __873� �� / co d 1 IE=876.00 _---_�'_a�5��i� / / .IE=868.41(W) / / / / / / CIle O r o I I \ \ SUMP=872.00 ` _ - i UY / IE = 867.00 (E) / / / / / � _ - - -' t- / WEIR 1=868.46 (12") / / / / / / 00 1 I 2 ASH _ - 883 \ \ �� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ±3.5 LF - 24" HDPE @ 2.00% _ ��/ WEIR 2=868.95 (48") , / / / / /' /' / I \ - \ /-S R C'EBE�I RY 7 \ _ =_ _ - - -877 - IE IN=868.48 c / - _ _ -878 - - - - - U�� i SEE DETAIL VC503 24" /R ° 1 I - 882-- --- _ '%P� - 881- �_-- N // �� as g1,/ °O 1 - - - _ - - v__�_-880�€RV Y. I�� - _ / - - / �� / 5'_ L WV .5,�MP 80 o o „e- - - - - °T -6 _ --8 - -�"-PTNSz- �PP� �o __ --- _ --- - LAA E� /i s ------- --- F - -__-- ---- --- - 3-9AI4 --- - -- ---- _ - _ _ _-- q _ _ NO DATE REVISION __------° --5 r7L-M--- _______ ------ °- 3"��A-- "a9A14----3�- _uf9i� _ - - - -?5r _� - aa o = �- 76 _ _ -� °- �,� _ s71 �, 3* _ I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Ian s ecifica- - l- I -_���} _ _ � -I-�= -�- - - - =W �P� - - - - -� - = I _ - -� _ -869- - p p _ _ _ - 870 - _ _ _'� - I� , ? A� - - �___= 874 -873 --------- -- --_ _- --------------- - - -- __---- -- - 68-867 - �_- _- _-_ tion or report was prepared by me or under TP=876.9 _-- __ _ _____ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _=71-1IT INV- -.9------- -----------871 - _----- _ - ° - - --3- M-- _ = 866 g65�- - 871- - = „�N� _ - - - _ - -°- - _ _ _ _ _�g61� 880 my direct supervision and that I am a duly -------------- -870- -T9P 70.-0 - --- _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _T= __- _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - Licensed Professional Engineer under the - _-__- _----------869---- IN�8 54 _ _-------------- ---- -----�-- -- - - - -- -------------- -- 868--867-__ =-- __--_- �"_ _ _ - laws of the State of Minnesota. -----866--- _--- _ -866- _ _ ----- _------ __----Z ----� = SIGNATURE: _ -- _ r- --- ---94---------- -------------- ---- _- --- - - - - _ - =---I- -_---_-_ - - - -----=-852-=-,r> TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: ADAM BESSE SHEET NOTES LEGEND DATE: 04/24/2024 REG. NO.: 52597 STRUCTURE TABLE STRUCTURE ID DIAM. STRUCTURE DETAIL CASTING TYPE/DETAIL MH-01 60" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4020J MNDOT STD. PLATE 4110F/4101 D MH-02 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4020J MNDOT STD. PLATE 4110F/4101 D CB-03 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4020J MNDOT STD. PLATE 4125D/4133A/4154B CB-04 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4003B MNDOT STD. PLATE 4132G/4154B MH-05 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4003E MNDOT STD. PLATE 4110F/4101 D OCS-06 48" SEE DETAIL 10/C504 SEE DETAIL 10/C504 CB-08 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4020J MNDOT STD. PLATE 4140D/4101 D CB-09 48" MNDOT STD. PLATE 4020J MNDOT STD. PLATE 4132G/4154B CB-10 18" SEE DETAIL 6/C504 SEE DETAIL 6/C504 CB-11 18" SEE DETAIL 6/C504 SEE DETAIL 6/C504 NOTE: STRUCTURE TABLE PROVIDED FOR DESIGN INTENT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING STRUCTURES NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS 1. EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. UTILIZE THE "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SYSTEM" (1-800-252-1166) TO HAVE PUBLIC UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. CONTACT THE OWNER TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY CONFLICTS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER DETAIL 4/C503. 3. NOT ALL PIPE FITTINGS ARE SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY PIPE FITTINGS TO COMPLETE THE WORK. 4. PIPES WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO ENSURE THEY ARE LEAK FREE. 5. ADJUST CATCH BASIN RIMS TO FINISHED GRADE. SHEET KEY NOTES OPROVIDE 18" OV VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER SERVICE AND TOP OF CHAMBERS & MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7.5' OF COVER. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS > STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE r , L----J DETENTION CHAMBER, SEE DETAIL 5/C503 » SANITARY SEWER 1®) SANITARY MANHOLE �S CLEANOUT, SEE DETAIL 4/C504 -I WATER SERVICE W M GATE VALVE, SEE DETAIL 2/C504 THRUST BLOCK, SEE DETAIL 9/C504 PIPE INSULATION, SEE 2/C506 WARNING LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CALL BEFORE DIGGING MINNESOTA ONE -CALL SYSTEM 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY MN STATUTE 216D COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: UTILITY PLAN DRAWN BY: DPG CHECKED BY:BJH PROJ. NO: 210890 DRAWING NO: C201 \ 890 19" INW _ _ V "_'m"z -I' I� , V. I CD � I •6j -�- \ ��-I -� z1 If�V=8 2.2 Wj \ \ \ o,-__ e� T R E S \Cn \ \ \ o CTR A S S -JOo/ � v , o �%-3 20�"MPL\ \ \ / / \ \ �� i� �\ \\ o \ 889- ---- 1- v BX \ / \ / 7 �R SPF� - / `�\i ; 18' �IOyEI���� J \ / " - - \ J 888� �GRDL----881� / ��_-_ / \\ \ \\ \�\� i� _\ 8�2 \ \ \ 691 887- / Q i CANOPY i ;o-�Dl_ ti I / / / / / / / C 06 � �N0-3 M \ / / i ej \ \ \ \ / GRDL z Gv / WV BSI/ /�0 / / / / / �0- 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.338.2029 U I / / / / / / CONCR�TE WALE / °yE� / / -876- v / �� �- �� - � �� � _-_ � - ---- LP�813�81R ��5 �6-877---� I \\ �J /� coL CLIENT: G� _-� �__� II WASHINGTON COUNTY \ <-12�, �' / - 884 _ / \ �° \° ° ° ° ° ° 0�L0 ° �� 0 �°� - / / / / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - - - - - - - �; 883 r '� \ \ /-886 883 882 1-J-- - ----- / 0 6 9> � - - - °° 882 881 A& SM H °°° °°° °°° °°° °°° \ \ \ 0 \ 1 / AGENCY .° °°°_� °°° 880.14 �� _ _ / / G R A S S TOP=884.8 v q,�`` I I °°° \ �\ 880.54� 0 880.34 880.04 879.93 \ LP878.60 / 89 / CO \ ` 7645 CURRELL BLVD. INV 879.5 N,N \ 879.82 879.30\ o \ \ / INV=879.7�E) \� 884_- ,g84- 880.85 \ \ 880.60 � / , \ \\ \ \ WOODBURY, MN 55125 885 \ J I �g3 880.52 •879.79 879.63 \ 0 N - \ z 885 - 885 - 881.00 � - � > > > 880.38 879.70 - � 880.43 \8 880.21 _ 879.77 q v v - 881.00 880.87 880.29 \ �� 879.59 879.04 � \\ \ ,° p / QP �g5 ��� - /� \ - _ \ 881.00--,)/ _ \ 879.94 879.04 879.90 879.87 0 \ \ \ \ 1 / „ Ir - / - - � / \ 880.75 6' 879.57 \ \ \ \ / - - - - 1� 881.20 B �� 880.31 \ 883- 8i t 879.80 \ I /� / - 80 7881. 882 - \ \\ 881.13 \ \` 880.08 880.08 \\ \\ o� I I INFILTRATION BASIN \ -- G% , , - _ _ M-880 ` ► 0 00 \ l BOT=868.00 / \ _ - i / \ 881.50 C 880.80 f / i Gi Gi - - - \ \ \ 881.25 880.50 O° \ - - - - 884 - - - I \ O / - - - 87 _ _ \ \ - - - - - �' 880.02 0E-869.80 J z / Gi Gi G% - - _ _ - _ \ \ \ \ \ \ 880.23 880.26 \ co \ \ \ i 100-YR HWL=869.94 O O \ 880.34 o EOF=870.30 87( 75 g74 - - \ \ \\ \ \ >�->�>-880.61 > I I \ \ \ 881.50 880.52 88 _ 1 I / // /" / i� - �\ \ \ \\ \ 881.50 881.00 881.00 / i�� -872 �� ���\ \ \\ �\ \ 881.50 �3\ \ Q� 2. , \ \ \ \ \ 880.81 ► R ` 8a / / / / ✓ / \ \ \ \ o ti EOF=870.00 / i \ \ \ � N \ I s /�� « / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / 881.42 I ao I ` ON N N M / / / ° \ \ \ I TR y ° \ \ \ / 8 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 881.42 ONS -883___ I /�v \ \ � ►S Q c oc - -i \ Q \ / / N \ \ \ \ \ i 05 00 � i i I i i t FOR 2p24 1 M / / ° PROPOSED BUILDING \ \ \ \ I I 881.50 a, I 1 I NO 4124� / \ � / / / / / / ° FFE=881.50 \ \ \ \ \ \ I I / 10 // / / / / / / ° (ARCH=100' 0") \ \ \ \ 881.00 \ 881.33t.. \ 883 5 / / / \ IU00 1 C506 / I i ° 1 I i I I I I I \ I I 880.91 880.84 \ II I I ° 881.50 / �> 1 i i I I i I ° 881.44 1 I I I I i I \ I I I � c ° / 881.50 / I co 0 \ "_M P \ 881.00 881.46 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I ) / C.0 �� \\ l ,STA% #30 II I\ i I I e 880.19 1 1 1 Y LINE / SM \ \ I � o ; 880.27 881.401 �1 I I I I \ \ \ THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" - �� TOP 3.2 \ I o g 881.00 I I00 I I \ \ ` \ ON FULL SIZE SHEETS />_ \ INV 70.2 v / \ \ o o I 1 S \ \ /o MAX. m RCP Sr > - -882- / - \ \ < < < - � > > / > >�-� > > > > > 879.19 879.15 co I i 24� / \ s \ \ AT E TI-880.18' / l l / 880. I C 0qN�� FF7 880.10 2 ��� /-->>>-- ---> - > T -- > \ 881.35/ / / / _� /� 879 878.60 / \ 40' BLUFF LINE SETBACK ( \ \ N 1 �� - 880.01 - 879.94 . 3" PLI 49 878.54 - °°PLAN / /00 / ° NO 04DATE24 ISSUED FOR - - - a' 881 i / 879 - f- �--�°(40� \ \ I K 882 880 / / / / 879 I 883 _ _-� - \ \ \ �\�\\ 881 ----- - �81 880 2 ° - - ,SEE C302 - GRADING ENLARGEMENT, mom i i 2" ASH CIS UAK\ rEor7'88,1871 M" / -- _I -879------�i �i /�i / 24" R / �o / 2_' ---------- i�,s-� 882 °GRAB - - _ - I' 882 - - 1 _--881 - - - I --�--- --- - _ - - - - ------ - - - �� _ _ �- -��- _ / ) - 882 - 880 SE R 1 °-RA 0)an _ - COL►d- - _ �_ AMP gp- o = o - - - - - - _ �_'- 879-----�` _� _ - - --8 L--�o1P� _� PiN�_- SPA _ ---_ _ _ ---- _ _ E - _ - - _ I °- �- 3"°sAi� _ T_ - -_ _� - ------ °E-L --5 7L-M---- ------ --_-� - �_------- �AAI4- --�'� K---UAI� -ate o �� - -r -�-- _- °VAIN--- 6 - _ _ - - _ _ - _ - - - NO DATE REVISION u �p P'') _O -_ �R -t- I _�76-- _ _ -�- �_ I -W (P� 1 - - -�- - 871 T - - - _ _ _ _ � _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ - _ _ �-IT =87� -8 _ _ _ _ _-� - = I_�_ I HEREBY CERTIFY that this plan, specifica- - _ --------- --- --� ------------ - -- _ - _� �- _ �P-876.9 - - - G - - 874 -873- - - _ _ � _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � - � _ _ _ _ _ = 868-867 � _ _ _ _ _ tion or report was prepared by me or under �� \ -- I ------- 31'- W INV=851.9------- --- ----872-871--------�AAN� - --------- ° _ _ _ __3"- M-_-_ 866 8654-- - -_ \ \ - - - - - - - _-T-9P_�70.@ - _ = 'ACN _ - _ _ y -� - _ _ - _ - $6 _B63 862- =861 _ - a my direct supervision and that I am a duly "W�Q.0ME TOE - v _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- = 870_ 869_ I1 8c_ t _ T _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _- _ _ _ - $6_ Licensed Professional Engineer under the Ali L H 8 �MINNES A� SIGN - - --------------- ---_-------------86s_-- it /��s�s _--- _-------------- _ - - -�-- _-- 3- 75U LA_ _ _ laws of the State of Minnesota. 'Z"°OAK / / �� \� ------ ---------- - _------------ ---- --867____ - --_- _ _ ---__ __� - SPA _ - _ _ ��-_ CONCR7E ALt - --- - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -866 - � -0------ -_ ==-Z --- _ _ " L-= _ - - ___ SIGNATURE: _ C1---C3--- - - AuOCI AA 866- -oai DEL-bF- �------------ -- _----- ----2' _NTf - _Q __ -- `°FL�tL _ - - - - -� - - - TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: ADAM BESSE ABBREVIATIONS SHEET NOTES LEGEND DATE: 04/24/2024 REG. NO.: 52597 EO EMERGENCY OVERFLOW B/S BOTTOM OF STAIRS 1. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISH SURFACE ELEVATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE 9. EXCAVATION WITHIN 2.0 FEET OF FINAL GRADE FOR INFILTRATION BASINS IS PROHIBITED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FIFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION T/S TOP OF STAIRS CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE APPROPRIATE DEDUCTIONS FOR VARYING SURFACES TO UNTIL CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS ARE CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL B/W BOTTOM OF WALL DETERMINE SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. - - -972- - EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR (1' INTERVAL) HP HIGH POINT T/W TOP OF WALL 10. INSTALLATION OF VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES MUST OCCUR IN DRY SOIL CONDITIONS. LP LOW POINT TOR TOP OF RAMP 2. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB LINES REPRESENT THE TOP BACK OF CURB UNLESS EXCAVATION, SOIL PLACEMENT AND RAPID STABILIZATION OF PERIMETER SLOPES MUST 970 EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR (5' INTERVAL) MP MID POINT MATCH EXISTING, FIELD VERIFY OTHERWISE NOTED. BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT. TBC TOP BACK OF CURB 972 MINOR CONTOUR (1' INTERVAL) BC BACK OF CURB 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY IN THE AFFECTED AREA AND NOTIFY THE 11. EXCAVATION OF INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN EXCAVATOR WITH A OWNER IF CONTAMINANTS ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING SOILS. TOOTHED BUCKET. USE EXCAVATOR BUCKET TO PLACE MATERIALS. CONSTRUCTION 970 MAJOR CONTOUR (5' INTERVAL) EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN THE BASIN. 4. ONLY PLACE FILL MATERIALS ON COMPETENT, INSPECTED SUBGRADE. 972.50 SPOT ELEVATION 5. SEE SHEET C101 FOR THE SEDIMENTATIONS AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 6i Gi 6i ADA CRITICAL AREA (2% MAX. SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION) a 6. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA. DO NOT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER WITH REVERSE GUTTER z ALLOW WATER TO POND IN EXCAVATION AREAS, AND MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. - - - - - - GRADE BREAK Q 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST TO GRADE ALL MANHOLES STRUCTURES AND SWALE APPURTENANCES THAT FALL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR CD SHALL KEEP ALL SAID EXISTING UTILITIES AND THEIR APPURTENANCES FREE OF DEBRIS - DRAINAGE ARROW 0 AND OPERABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. -= 8. PREVENT CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT, DIRT AND DEBRIS FROM ENTERING ALL a INFILTRATION BMPS. �o o� o� � N o O rn N o � c� N -T d co 0 � o DTI WARNING LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CALL BEFORE DIGGING MINNESOTA ONE -CALL SYSTEM 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY MN STATUTE 216D COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: GRADING PLAN DRAWN BY: DPG CHECKED BY:BJH PROJ. NO: 210890 DRAWING NO: I�i 0 7" SPR &Ivox SPR INv G R A SS 0 �1 �HCBX \\ 40 CBX 5' LONG, 2' WIDE SOLID WHITE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STRIPING SPACED EVERY 4' O.C. E:? A I:ol jO MPL w I 2' WIDE BITUMINOUS PATCH w I SEE DETAIL 6/C502 STOP SIGN U I CANOPY o I L — — — — J R . I WV 68"x78" TRANSFORMER PAD 0 Iu , TyOs SEE ELECTRICAL CONCRETE WALL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON �Yo SEE DETAIL 4/C502 �. o�\ ��\o \ TRASH ENCLOSURE • T R E E S FENCE \ \ �\d ° SEE LANDSCAPE \ a CC!6' I I I I a l d ! \ ~ LANDING FOR 1.5' -- •�. % °' a + \ TRASH ENCLOSURE Q7._. # ° I RIPRAP AT OUTLET I BUILDING EGRESS & \ SEE DETAIL 71051 ___ I ACCESSIBLE PARKING CONCRETE WALK �\° i T KITCHEN TRASH a SEE SHEET C511 w d REMOVAL ROUTE CURB RAMP — �1 -� _�, I -r— 39.67' Qa �., d a° I dl al ° \� l 4 # • I I \ —t ° I °1 ° I° 4 1 1 I 1 I I� -10 I \ I __ I __ __1_° I_ I°__�1 /01 CONCRETE WALK AT STOOP ° ° f I ° I I ffi 1 1 ° 1 r a 1 1 SEE DETAIL 3/C50213 CONCRETE WALK AT STOOP d—j- • -- 15.33' SEE DETAIL 310502 ° 1 1 ° °--1 ° I R \ d PATIO AREA �N� SEE LANDSCAPE 18.6T 6 • _ _ O CONCRETE WALK AT STOOP -- PAVER AREA SEE DETAIL 3/C502 SEE LANDSCAPE • �5� PROPOSED BUILDING I — — B-03 $ • $ B-05 CONCRETE WALK AT STOOP 6"°MPS:\ SEE ARCH. "� -- a CONCRETE WALK SEE DETAIL 3IC502 _ —_7 a F EGRESS &STAFF ENTRANCE 77, _ I I Y L �N $ T-R o $ B d CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON F SEE DETAIL 4/C502 ' I ' SITE LIGHTING A. SEE ELECTRICAL d _ 6' .— + + + 40' BLUFF LINE SETBACK +• +�! —_\ — _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - MNDOT B612 CONCRETE ° P 4" WIDE SOLID WHITE STRIPING $ S-01 MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER �I SPACED EVERY 2' O.C. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 3 OAK — ° �� f MNDOT S412 CONCRETE 2" MPL — CURB AND GUTTER _:7**� I 5' CURB TRANSITION • • CONSTRUCTION LIMITS FROM B612 TO S412 • 2 "` 3"oOAK I SER CEBE RY.7' • APPROXIMATE HIGHWAY EMBANKMENT EDGE 2"OCRAB 2" uz� ° °CR,— 5' EL FOL SIGN WV 5" °MF 2" W T 3 T O 3iOTR METAL RAIL 3110TR SAN —� FOL SIGN ° TOP=876.9 — \ \ 3" E M INV=851.9 WELCOME TO \ MINNESOTA'' SIGN 2"OOAK CONCRETE WALL HHF P-0ELM FENCE SEE LANDSCAPE PET AREA SEE LANDSCAPE r� \\ `P� SEE ARCH. CONCRETE WALK 1 BO PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP q o o LLARD LIGHT o� MNDOT B612 CONCRETE • SEE SHEET C512 514 � \' � SEE ELECTRICAL CURB AND GUTTER t o PAVER AREA G R A S S R 18' 8, o+ a0000 253R AllSEE° ° # SEE LANDSCAPE • +� \ \ �+ + 30, + r + -6 + MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PATH —� CURB RAMP MP �Q • a l PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP SEE SHEET C512-514 4' LONG, 2' WIDE SOLID WHITE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STRIPING SPACED EVERY 4' O.C. 4" WIDE SOLID WHITE STRIPING, TYP. J II m CURB TRANSITI( 2' WIDE BITUMINOUS PATCH (0" TO 6" OVER SEE DETAIL 6/C502 MATCH EXISTING 18.67' 24' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MNDOT B612 CONCRETE OC � CURB AND GUTTER � + + MONUMENT SIGN MNDOT B612 CON( o CURB AND GL ELM o 2 °2�ELM 5" °MPL P S,PR 7101 PINS "oSPR 3" °OAK "o E 5 _ CBOT i SHEET NOTES $ B-04 o I — — — — — — — — — — — — — C-3 C2-OWLNT 1. PREVENT FROM DAMAGE ALL SURFACES OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AT NO COST TO OWNER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DRAWINGS. 2. ADJUST ALL CASTINGS, VALVE BOXES AND JUNCTION BOXES TO FINISH GRADE. 3. PROVIDE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT BETWEEN PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS AND ALL ADJACENT CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS SURFACES. 4. PROVIDE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT BETWEEN THE WEARING AND NON -WEARING COURSES FOR ALL PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS. 5. THIS PLAN MAY NOT SHOW THE FULL EXTENTS OF TOPSOIL AND SEED RESTORATION REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORATION OF ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE WORK USING TOPSOIL AND SEED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING DIMENSIONS, STOOP, STAIRS, RAMP, FOOTINGS, AND FOUNDATIONS. 7. DIMENSIONS ARE TO EDGE OF PAVEMENT, BACK OF CURB, OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING, EDGE OF WALK, OR CENTER OF STRUCTURE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT ALL PAVEMENTS TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT GRADES AT TIE-IN POINTS. CUT CONTRACTION JOINTS AT EXISTING JOINT LOCATIONS. 9. CONTINUE ALL JOINTS THROUGH THE CURB. 10. SAW ALL CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS, CLEAN THEM OF DEBRIS, BLOW THEM DRY AND IMMEDIATELY SEAL WITH JOINT SEALANT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL 2/C502 11. REINFORCE ODD SHAPED PAVING PANELS WITH #4 BARS AT 12" EACH WAY. AN ODD SHAPED PANEL IS CONSIDERED TO BE ONE IN WHICH THE SLAB TAPERS TO A SHARP ANGLE WHEN THE LENGTH TO WIDTH RATIO EXCEEDS 3 TO 1 OR WHEN A SLAB IS NEITHER SQUARE NOR RECTANGULAR. RIPRAP AT OUTLET INFILTRATION BASIN I SEE DETAIL 7/C51 5.33' / SEE DETAIL 7/C504 6' I CONCRETE WALK AT STOOP _ SEE DETAIL 3/C502 RIPRAP AT OUTLET EGRESS WALK FOR STAIRS ' SEE DETAIL 7/C51 / I I 11'x14' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PAD SEE DETAIL 6/C504 a— o o a o vl 11 / p a _a V a I $ B-06- 14sTu I $ B-09 — — — — — — — — — — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — 211 S • I L • 24" MNDOT CLA�� , \,, • PLACE 24" THICK ROCK DITCH CHECKS TO BE LOCATED EVERY 12' RV Y.I 1 1 " ELM o CS 2 1EL M o o " .43OOAK Q P G PI W Eo OSPRLPR 311 2" WLN ° 2" WLNT zOri C2- WLNT LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL 1/C502 INSET A + + + + BITUMINOUS TRAIL, SEE DETAIL 1/C502 INSET C CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 4/C514 V N V 0 V N V CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL 1/C502 INSET D CONCRETE WALK, SEE DETAIL 1/C502 INSET B PAVER AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS RIP -RAP, SEE PLAN SITE LIGHTING, SEE ELECTRICAL • ROOF DRAIN, SEE DETAIL 6/C503 211 I Co 15 rIN1 3" SPR 6-°0 �YOOAK 6 O ELM 5jOELM 4" °ELM ljr_l� 0 10' 20' 40' WARNING LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CALL BEFORE DIGGING MINNESOTA ONE —CALL SYSTEM 1-800-252-1166 REQUIRED BY MN STATUTE 216D LH 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD. WOODBURY, MN 55125 Ry RE�,�M�Np �oN p�t F° o�zQ1zp2Q THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2" x 1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 1 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION HEREBY CERTIFY that this plan, specifica— tion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SIGNATURE: — - TYPED OR PRINTED NAME: ADAM BESSE DATE: 04/24/2024 REG. NO.: 52597 COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN DRAWN BY: DPG CHECKED BY:BJH PROJ. NO: 210890 C401 DRAWING NO: FCL-1 AS AS FCL-2 BR AS C 1 NORTH ELEVATION A001 1 /8" = V-0" A A W gR Sc FCC FCC HM FCC W SC BR SC FCC FCC FCL-2 AS BR W FCL-1 AS BR W Sc FCC SF FCC Sc FLC-3 Sc BR W W Sc WEST ELEVATION 1 /8" = V-0" LC-3 C L-2 BR EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY: AS ASPHALT SHINGLE BR BRICK - COLOR 1 BR-2 BRICK - COLOR 2 FCC FIBER CEMENT WRAPPED COLUMN FCL-1 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 8" FCL-2 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 4" FLC-3 FIBER CEMENT PANEL HIM HOLLOW METAL DOOR SIB STEEL BOLLARD SC SINGLE SOLDIER COURSE SF ALUMINUM STOREFRONT TR TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE - STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH WOOD SLATS W FIBER GLASS WINDOW EXTERIOR WALL FINISH PERCENTAGES: MATERIAL KEY: • BR - BRICK • FCL - FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 3 COLORS EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES & PERCENTAGES: NORTH ELEVATION: • BR 1,821 SF 44% • FCL - 1,380 SF - 33% • WINDOWS/DOORS - 969 SF 23% 4,170 SF EAST ELEVATION: • BR 965 SF 45% • FCL 722 SF 34% • WINDOWS/DOORS - 450 SF 21% 2,137 SF TRASH ENCLOSURE: • NORTH, SOUTH, EAST - BR, 270 SF - 78% • WEST - WOOD SLAT/GATE, 78 SF - 22% 348 SF TOTAL BUILDING WALL AREA: 13,793 SF • BR 5,447 SF 39% TOTAL • FCL 5,226 SF 38% TOTAL • WINDOWS/DOORS - 3,120SF - 23%TOTAL SOUTH ELEVATION: • BR - 1,455 SF 31% • FCL 2217 SF 47% • WINDOWS/DOORS -1.023 SF - 22% 4,695 SF WEST ELEVATION: • BR 936 SF 38% • FCL 907 SF 37% • WINDOWS/DOORS - 600 SF - 25% 2,443 SF NOTE: ROOF AREA NOT INCLUDED IN WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD., WOODBURY, MN 55125 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 01 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION Ry sN010% pR F�Rp6 51� COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWN BY: XXX CHECKED BY: XXX PROJ. NO: 210890 DRAWING NO: A001 2 3 4 7 C A A co y N 1 j CV y CDy N 3 N AS W FCL-1 FLC-3 FCL-1 FCL-2 AS FCL-1 FCC AS FLC-3 Sc BR HIM W Sc BR 5G 5K 5G 5K SOUTH ELEVATION 1 /8" = V-0" EAST ELEVATION 1 /8" = 1'-0" AS FCL-2 FCL-1 W AS FCL-2 BR Sc W HIM BR Sc FCC SF FCC BR W FCC Sc EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY: AS ASPHALT SHINGLE BR BRICK - COLOR 1 BR-2 BRICK - COLOR 2 FCC FIBER CEMENT WRAPPED COLUMN FCL-1 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 8" FCL-2 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 4" FLC-3 FIBER CEMENT PANEL HIM HOLLOW METAL DOOR SIB STEEL BOLLARD SC SINGLE SOLDIER COURSE SF ALUMINUM STOREFRONT TR TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE - STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH WOOD SLATS W FIBER GLASS WINDOW 4j H 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD., WOODBURY, MN 55125 THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 01 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION Ry E�,�N1 sNp�,oN pR 'co 51� COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS DRAWN BY: XXX CHECKED BY: XXX PROJ. NO: 210890 A002 DRAWING NO: 2 3 4 5 Is 107 A A I .. cm —z 0 0 = o a 15B SECTION DETAIL a A EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY: AS ASPHALT SHINGLE BR BRICK - COLOR 1 BR-2 BRICK - COLOR 2 FCC FIBER CEMENT WRAPPED COLUMN FCL-1 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 8" FCL-2 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, 4" FLC-3 FIBER CEMENT PANEL HIM HOLLOW METAL DOOR SIB STEEL BOLLARD SC SINGLE SOLDIER COURSE SF ALUMINUM STOREFRONT TR TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE - STEEL TUBE FRAME WITH WOOD SLATS W FIBER GLASS WINDOW 4" THICK SIGN 4X4 GALVANIZED TUBE STEEL BR EMBED POST IN BR CONCRETE FOOTING SIB 24" MINIMUM CONCRETE PAD I I I I H h 12" DIAMETER CONCRETE LJI FOOTING 1 I l------�� - 6 MONUMENT SIGN DETAIL A003 3/4" = V-0" 6 6' - 4" 4 1/2" 5' - 7" 14949 62ND ST N, STILLWATER WASHINGTON COUNTY M EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING E � (###) ###-#### r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONUMENT SIGN 3/4" =1'-0" 41/2„ - SIGNAGE, (2) SIDES. L 1 AREA LESS THAN 24 SF - - METAL POST CAP 2 1/2" TEXT --- - 4X4 GALVANIZED TUBE STEEL -- 3" TEXT - 4" TEXT 2" TEXT EQUAL OPPORTUNITY HOUSING LOGO 4" GRADE — CONCRETE FOOTING I I I AND SLAB I I I I NOTE: VERIFY ALL TEXT WITH ARCHITECT & OWNER SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION NOTE: MONUMENT SIGN TO MEET PA DISTRICT ZONING STANDARDS 4 TRASH ENCLOSURE - LEFT A003 1 /4" = 1'-0" BR SIB h rl I 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE - BACK A003 1 /4" = 1'-0" ILJII i i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L_ L L1 F_ L I L____J L____J TRASH ENCLOSURE - RIGHT 1 /4" = 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE - FRONT 1 /4" = 1'-0" 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD., WOODBURY, MN 55125 A B C D E F G H J KEYPLAN THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 01 04/24/2024 PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION Ry pRE�,�N1 sNp�,oN F�Rp6 51� COPYRIGHT 2024 BY LHB, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING BR TR 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 SIB DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW - SITE ELEMENTS DRAWN BY: XXX CHECKED BY: XXX PROJ. NO: 210890 DRAWING NO: A003 2 3 4 5 h] C B ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 1" = 20'-0" U v Schedule Symbol Label Quantity Manufacturer Catalog Number Description Lamp Number Filename Lumens Per Light Loss Factor Wattage Lamps Lamp O B L 1 13 Lithonia Lighting DSXB LED 12C 350 40K ASY D-SERIES BOLLARD WITH 12 4000K LEDS OPERATED AT 350mA AND 1 DSXB LED 12C 350 40K ASY (1).ies 1283 1 16 ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION 1 Lithonia Lighting DSXF1 LED P1 40K MFL DSXF1 LED P1 40K MFL 1 DSXF1 LED P1 40K Absolute 1 21 F L 1 MFL.ies O R2 9 Lumencia Lighting LL85361-7R-8C-LED 7 ROUND DISK LIGHT WITH BATTERY BACKUP, 4000K, 80CRI, 120V N/A 1 1227 1 15 ❑ 2 Lithonia Lighting DSX1 LED P2 40K 80CRI TFTM D-Series Size 1 Area Luminaire P2 Performance Package 4000K CCT 80 1 DSX1 LED P2 40K 80CRI TFTM.ies 9154 1 67.79 S4 CRI Forward Throw 2 Lithonia Lighting W DGE2 LED P2 40K 80CRI W DGE2 LED WITH P2 - PERFORMANCE N/A 1 W DGE2 LED P2 40K 2018 1 18.9815 W P 1 T4M PACKAGE, 4000K, 80CRI, TYPE 4 80CRI T4M.ies MEDIUM OPTIC Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min PARKING LOT/SIDE WALKS + 1.4 fc 13.6 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A PROPERTY LINE + 0.0 fc 0.4 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41 L H� 701 Washington Ave. N, Ste 200 1 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1 612.338.2029 CLIENT: WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 7645 CURRELL BLVD., WOODBURY, MN 55125 A B C D E F G H J KEYPLAN THIS SQUARE APPEARS 1/2"x1/2" ON FULL SIZE SHEETS 01 04/24/2024 Plan Review Submittal NO DATE ISSUED FOR NO DATE REVISION I Hereby Certify That This Plan, Specification or Report Was Prepared By Me or Under My Direct Supervision and That I Am a Duly Licensed Professional Engineer Under the Laws of the State of Minnesot DAVID M. THOMAS REG. NO.56086 DATE: 04/23/2024 PROJECT NAME: EMERGENCY HOUSING SERVICES BUILDING 14949 62ND STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MN 55082 DRAWING TITLE: ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC DRAWN BY: TJD CHECKED BY: DMC PROJ. NO: 23-206 E101 DRAWING NO: V, 3 4 5 2570 Blue Water RD. Suite 100 Eagan, MN 55121 KUENG.COM Memorandum Date: 4/19/24 To: Joe Gustafson, PE, PTOE Copy to: From: Mark Powers, PE, PTOE RE: Washington County Emergency Housing Shelter Traffic Impacts Introduction This memorandum has been prepared to evaluate traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of an emergency housing shelter in Stillwater, MN (Figure 1). The facility is planned to be located adjacent to the Washington County Government Center and is expected to consist of 30 short- term dwelling units. The study area is surrounded by residential, institutional, religious, and educational land uses. <<KLI Objective The purpose of this memorandum is to measure and evaluate site -generated traffic, to identify unique issues and impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and to recommend short-term improvements where applicable. A traffic operations analysis is presented, comparing Existing and Build scenarios during AM and PM peak traffic hours. Study Intersections The following intersections, shown in Figure 1, were included in the study in order to evaluate potential impacts of the proposed development. 1. 62nd Street and Osgood Avenue (Signalized) 2. 62nd Street and Oxboro Avenue (Side -street stop -controlled) 3. 62nd Street and Panama Avenue (All -way stop -controlled) 4. 62nd Street and Paris Avenue (Side -street stop -controlled) 5. 62nd Street and Beach Road (Side -street stop -controlled) Existing Conditions Primary Roadway 62nd Street Within the study area, 62nd Street is a county road west of Panama Avenue and a local road east of Panama Avenue. 62nd Street is a two-lane undivided roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Traffic Volumes AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected by KU at the study intersections using StreetLight InSight. StreetLight uses connected vehicle data to estimate vehicle trips. These counts were validated using average annual daily traffic (AADT) values collected by MnDOT. The AM peak was observed between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM. The PM peak was observed between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM. The collected counts were balanced, with the results for the AM and PM peak hours shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Raw traffic volumes of the study intersections are included in Appendix A. Table 1 - Existing Traffic Volumes (AM Peak: 7:00-8:00 AM) ID 1 IntersectionNorthbound 62nd Street & Osgood Avenue 1 207 97 Southbound Eastbound 7 132 1 1 1 1 Westbound 62 1 1 2 62nd Street & Oxboro Avenue 4 1 1 5 1 1 2 64 39 23 59 1 3 62nd Street & Panama Avenue 37 2 6 3 3 1 4 36 30 21 45 4 4 62nd Street & Paris Avenue 2 - 1 - - - - 33 12 1 68 - 5 62nd Street & Beach Road 59 43 1 1 20 9 11 11 12 1 1 1 L — Left, T — Thru, R — Right Table 2 - Existina Traffic Volumes (PM Peak: 3:00-4:00 PM) ID 1 • 62"d Street & Osgood Avenue Northbound 5 258 82 Southbound 3 272 1 Eastbound 1 1 2 Westbound 121 1 7 2 62"d Street & Oxboro Avenue 38 3 6 2 3 1 1 58 27 2 90 1 3 62"d Street & Panama Avenue 57 1 7 7 1 15 22 39 5 1 21 13 4 62"d Street & Paris Avenue 3 - 1 - - - - 50 3 1 32 - 5 62"d Street & Beach Road 28 58 1 1 67 4 4 2 45 1 1 1 L — Left, T — Thru, R — Right Build Conditions Trip Generation The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11t" Edition was utilized to estimate the additional trips generated by the proposed development. As there is no land use category specifically for emergency housing shelters in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, all potentially applicable land use categories were evaluated, as summarized in Table 3. Each land use category was evaluated with 30 Dwelling Units as the independent variable. Affordable Housing based on Income Limits was selected as the most applicable land use category. Table 3 shows that this land use category is comparable to other evaluated categories regarding generated traffic, and that the difference between them is small. Land Use Land Use Weekday Multifamily Housing Subcategory Not Close to Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit (Low -Rise) Rail Transit 134 134 8 24 21 12 Multifamily Housing Not Close to (Mid -Rise) Rail Transit 68 68 3 8 7 5 Affordable Housing Income 126 125 6 14 13 9 Limits Affordable Housing Senior - - 3 2 2 1 Mobile Home Park All Sites 144 143 5 18 11 6 Senior Adult Housing - All Sites 56 56 2 5 4 4 Multifamily Residential Planned All Sites 111 111 6 20 15 9 Unit Development Trip Distribution and Assignment The origins and destinations of site -generated traffic were based on a Streetlight Insight analysis of observed travel patterns for the residential portions of the study area. Trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway network using a weighted distribution based on the existing trips. The trip distributions and assignments for the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 - Trip Distribution and Assignment Projected Build traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Table 4 - Build Traffic Volumes (AM Peak: 7:00-8:00 AM) 1 JW= 62"d Street & Osgood Avenue L 1 T —Ftl L T R 207 102 8 132 1 L T 1 1 R 1 L 76 T 1 1 2 62"d Street & Oxboro Avenue 18 1 1 5 1 1 2 64 45 23 59 1 3 62"d Street & Panama Avenue 37 2 6 3 3 1 4 36 30 21 45 4 4 62"d Street & Paris Avenue 2 - 1 - - - - 33 12 1 68 - 5 62"d Street & Beach Road 59 43 1 1 20 9 11 11 12 1 1 1 Table 5 - Build Traffic Volumes (PM Peak: 3:00-4:00 PM) ID 1 Inters • 62"d Street & Osgood Avenue Northbound 5 258 93 Southbound Eastbound 3 272 1 1 1 2 Westbound 126 1 8 2 62"d Street & Oxboro Avenue 44 3 9 2 3 1 1 58 38 4 90 1 3 62"d Street & Panama Avenue 57 1 7 7 1 15 22 42 5 1 23 13 4 62"d Street & Paris Avenue 3 - 1 - - - - 53 3 1 34 - 5 62"d Street & Beach Road 30 58 1 1 67 4 4 2 48 1 1 1 The expected weekday distribution of traffic generated by the proposed development is shown in Figure 3. The anticipated change to average daily traffic (ADT) in the study area is shown in Figure 4. Figure 3 — Weekday Distribution of Development Traffic Traffic Operations Analysis Traffic Operations Methodology Traffic operations analysis results are described as a Level of Service (LOS), ranging from "A" to "F", with "A" operating with the least delay and "F" operating with the most delay. LOS is determined based on methodology provided by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), which defines the LOS based on control delay. The average intersection control delay is a volume weighted average of delay experienced by all motorists entering the intersections on all approaches. The LOS and its associated delay for unsignalized and signalized intersections, as defined by the HCM, are shown in Table 6. LOS "D" or lower is considered to be unacceptable. LOS for two-way stop -controlled intersections is undefined by the HCM, as the major street generally experiences no delay because it is uncontrolled. However, vehicles turning left or crossing the major street can experience significant delay. LOS assigned to two-way stop -controlled intersections in this study is thus determined based on the delay experienced by the side street approaches. Traffic Models Traffic operations analysis was completed using Synch ro/Si mTraffic V12 software and included road geometry such as number of lanes, storage lengths, link distances, speed limits, and traffic volumes. The results of the Synchro analyses are displayed as Measures of Effectiveness (MOE). The primary MOEs that are used in this study are delay and level of service (LOS). The following scenarios were modeled for the AM and PM peak periods: 1. Existing Scenario 2. Build Scenario "Existing" refers to the conditions with existing traffic counts and without the proposed development scenario. "Build" refers to the conditions with the proposed development scenario. This includes the existing traffic counts and the additional trips generated by the proposed development. Existing signal timings at the 62"d Street and Osgood Avenue intersection were provided by Washington County and incorporated into the Existing and Build models. Traffic Operations Results The traffic operations results for the Existing and Build scenarios are provided in Table 7. Detailed SimTraffic results are included in Appendix B. Table 7 - Troffir Onerations Results ID Intersection Traffic Control Scenario Peak Hour• Approach •Intersection 1 62nd Street & Osgood Avenue Signal Existing AM A A A A A PM B B A A A Build AM B B A A A PM B B A A A 2 62nd Street & Oxboro Avenue Side- Stop p Existing AM A A A A A PM A A A A A Build AM A A A A A PM A A A A A 3 62nd Street & Panama Avenue All -Way Stop ExistingPM AM A A A A A A A A A A Build AM A A A A A PM A A A A A 4 62n6 Street & Paris Avenue Side- et Street p Existing AM A A A A A PM A A A A A Build AM A A A A A PM A A A A A 5 62nd Street & Beach Road Side- Street Stop Existing AM A A A A A PM A A A A A Build AM A A A A A PM A A A A A All study intersections and approaches are expected to operate with acceptable delay and LOS during the peak hours of both the Existing and Build scenarios. No queuing issues were identified. Summary This memorandum has been prepared to evaluate the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development of an emergency housing shelter in Stillwater, MN to be operated by Washington County. The Existing and Build traffic operations in the roadway network near the proposed development were investigated. The following summarizes the key findings of this study: Trip Generation The proposed development is expected to generate an additional 251 trips during the weekday, with 20 trips during the AM Peak and 22 trips during the PM peak. Traffic Distribution Streetlight InSight analysis of observed travel patterns for the residential portions of the study area indicates that approximately 75% of traffic generated by the proposed development will utilize 62nd Street west of Oxboro Avenue and approximately 15% will utilize 62nd Street east of Oxboro Avenue. Traffic Operations All intersections and their approaches are expected to experience acceptable operations during the AM and PM peaks of both the Existing and Build scenarios. APPENDIX A - RAW TRAFFIC VOLUMES Raw StreetLight Data Traffic Volumes for May, 2023 AM 7-8am Intersection of 62nd St with NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Osgood Ave 1 207 90 6 132 1 1 1 1 62 1 1 Oxboro Ave 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 42 39 20 46 1 Panama Ave 34 2 6 3 3 1 4 36 30 19 37 4 Paris Ave 2 1 - - - - 1 1 1 63 Beach Rd 56 43 1 1 20 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 PM 3-4pm Intersection of 62nd St with NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Osgood Ave 5 258 82 3 272 1 1 1 2 121 1 7 Oxboro Ave 30 3 6 2 3 1 1 47 22 2 71 1 Panama Ave 34 1 7 7 1 9 18 33 4 1 11 11 Paris Ave 2 1 - - - - 47 3 1 23 - Beach Rd 23 58 1 1 67 3 4 2 43 1 1 1 APPENDIX B-TRAFFIC OPERATIONS REPORTS (SYNCH RO/SI MTRAFFIC) SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 5.9 8.3 2.5 2.9 3.4 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 2.3 5.0 4.6 1.5 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.2 4.0 4.3 4.6 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 2.8 0.1 3.7 1.1 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 3.3 4.4 1.3 0.2 1.5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 5.8 Existing Conditions AM Peak SirnTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 Intersection: 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 28 64 8 5 75 44 16 58 Average Queue (ft) 1 27 0 0 22 12 2 10 95th Queue (ft) 12 48 4 4 59 33 10 36 Link Distance (ft) 579 574 1108 1108 1286 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 100 110 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 35 36 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 3 7 6 95th Queue (ft) 5 19 28 26 Link Distance (ft) 574 603 916 294 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LTR LT R LTR 40 68 49 45 21 31 22 21 22 18 2 7 47 52 35 40 13 28 603 586 173 628 80 0 0 85 Existing Conditions AM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Movement EB NB Existing Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 Directions Served TR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 31 Average Queue (ft) 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 8 19 Link Distance (ft) 586 415 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 22 12 20 Average Queue (ft) 11 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 25 8 13 Link Distance (ft) 10 380 476 Upstream Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 Existing Conditions AM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 10.6 11.9 4.1 5.4 5.8 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 1.0 5.0 4.3 1.6 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 4.4 4.1 3.2 4.4 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 3.2 0.2 4.4 2.1 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.2 3.8 0.9 0.2 1.0 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 7.6 Existing Conditions PM Peak SirnTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 Intersection: 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 104 21 26 114 43 15 119 Average Queue (ft) 4 43 3 2 44 13 1 36 95th Queue (ft) 21 79 14 13 91 35 9 83 Link Distance (ft) 579 574 1108 1108 1286 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 100 110 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 59 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 28 4 95th Queue (ft) 5 52 22 Link Distance (ft) 603 916 294 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LTR LT R LTR 57 30 36 59 21 31 26 4 15 25 4 15 50 22 33 48 18 39 603 586 173 628 80 85 0 0 0 0 Existing Conditions PM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Existing Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 24 6 31 Average Queue (ft) 2 0 2 95th Queue (ft) 14 5 16 Link Distance (ft) 586 10 415 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 12 29 Average Queue (ft) 15 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 31 6 15 Link Distance (ft) 10 380 483 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2 Existing Conditions PM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report Build Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 11.0 10.7 3.0 3.2 4.2 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.6 2.2 5.1 3.6 1.6 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 5.2 4.0 4.4 4.7 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 2.9 0.1 2.9 1.3 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 3.4 4.2 1.3 0.1 1.6 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 Total DelNeh (s) 6.6 Build Conditions AM Peak SirnTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Build Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 Intersection: 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 73 20 11 94 48 24 48 Average Queue (ft) 2 30 1 0 29 13 2 10 95th Queue (ft) 14 59 8 4 70 38 13 34 Link Distance (ft) 579 574 1108 1108 1286 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 100 110 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 31 31 Average Queue (ft) 2 14 6 95th Queue (ft) 14 39 26 Link Distance (ft) 603 916 294 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LT R LTR LT R LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 53 55 45 55 21 36 Average Queue (ft) 25 21 21 18 5 6 95th Queue (ft) 49 48 36 42 19 27 Link Distance (ft) 603 586 173 628 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 80 85 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Build Conditions AM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Movement EB NB Build Conditions AM Peak 04/10/2024 Directions Served TR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 30 Average Queue (ft) 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 14 19 Link Distance (ft) 586 415 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 18 12 24 Average Queue (ft) 12 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 24 6 12 Link Distance (ft) 10 380 467 Upstream Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 1 Build Conditions AM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Performance Report Build Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 11.6 11.7 4.2 5.5 6.1 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 0.5 1.2 4.7 5.1 1.9 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.5 4.3 4.0 2.9 4.4 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Performance by approach Approach EB WB NB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total DelNeh (s) 3.2 0.2 4.6 2.1 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Performance by approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total DelNeh (s) 2.2 3.3 0.9 0.1 1.1 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 Total DelNeh (s) 8.1 Build Conditions PM Peak SirnTraffic Report Page 1 Queuing and Blocking Report Build Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 Intersection: 3: Osgood Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LT R L T R L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 102 21 16 100 49 15 120 Average Queue (ft) 4 43 3 1 40 16 1 36 95th Queue (ft) 22 78 14 10 80 39 7 80 Link Distance (ft) 579 574 1108 1108 1286 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 115 100 110 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Intersection: 6: Oxboro Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 6 12 53 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 29 8 95th Queue (ft) 4 7 49 30 Link Distance (ft) 574 603 916 294 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 9: Panama Ave & 62nd St Movement EB EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LT R LTR LT R LTR 50 30 34 57 21 36 27 4 17 24 5 18 49 20 33 45 19 43 603 586 173 628 80 85 0 0 Build Conditions PM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Intersection: 12: Paris Ave & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Build Conditions PM Peak 04/10/2024 Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 6 31 Average Queue (ft) 2 0 4 95th Queue (ft) 14 5 21 Link Distance (ft) 586 10 415 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 13: Beach Rd & 62nd St Movement EB WB NB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 12 33 Average Queue (ft) 15 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 26 8 17 Link Distance (ft) 10 380 477 Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 2 Build Conditions PM Peak SimTraffic Report Page 3 Tim Gladhill From: John Hodler <johnhodler@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 3:20 PM To: Planning Dept Subject: I support the Washington County Emergency Housing project [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To: City of Stillwater Planning Commission and Council, The affordable housing crisis Stillwater, Washington County, and the entire state of Minnesota faced before the pandemic has become even worse. The lack of affordable housing results in people living on the street, in a car, tent, etc. while they attempt to find housing. Neither the City of Stillwater or Washington County provide any permanent space for emergency housing capacity for individuals. Here is the city/county's capacity compared to other Minnesota counties. (The proposed EHSB has a capacity for 30-35.) Washington: 0 Dakota: 45 Ramsey: 500 Scott/Carver: 20 Anoka: 66 Hennepin: 824 The Emergency Housing Services Building (EHSB) will provide transitional housing for those experiencing homelessness. It is not designed for long term housing. The Emergency Housing Services Building will provide safe shelter, the first step to finding permanent housing for couples, individuals and seniors experiencing homelessness. Additionally the EHSB will have 24/7 on site service providers, that combined with the services provided by the Washington County Homeless Outreach team, will facilitate moving homeless citizens into permanent housing. The Washington County Commissioners have committed funds to construct the EHSB and fund its ongoing operational costs. I ask Stillwater's City Planning Commission and City Council to approve the construction of this essential building located on the Washington County government center property. John Hodler 2403 Pond Circle, Stillwater (c) 651 343 4638 ,johnhodler@gmai I.com Angela Ross From: Tim Gladhill Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 5:29 PM Cc: Planning Subject: FW: Emergency Housing project Public Comment re EHSB. This message has been blind copied to the Planning Commission. r wa ter T M F B 1 R T H V LAC F O F Y I M N F S n T A 1 Tim Gladhill City of Stillwater Community Development Director tgladhill(a-)_stillwatermn.gov www.stillwatermn.gov httDS://www.facebook.com/StillwaterMinnesota P: 651-430-8821 Schedule a Meetina **new link** From: Nikki DeMeglio <glassesgriffin@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 5:24 PM To: Tim Gladhill <tgladhill@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Emergency Housing project [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon. I live in the neighborhood of the proposed Emergency Housing project and I have some significant concerns surrounding this proposal. If I understand correctly, Washington County is proposing that an "emergency" housing project be located in Oak Park Heights after unsuccessful attempts in other parts of the county. I'm wondering what is contributing to the lack of success in other areas and how I can access that information. As noted by the letters of recommendation by the local church and a few others, those who are facing housing challenges are going to other far away communities in which they have no vested interest in. What policies or requirements will prevent other counties from filling this shelter with people who are not part of our community? In addition, this location is close to almost zero businesses. Are these people going to be frequenting the local Walgreens store on the corner for lack of any other place to be? In addition, without easy access to transit or walking distance of the main hub of businesses I see residents feeling stranded away from opportunities to lift themselves from their situation. The elephant in the room is that a homeless shelter WILL impact the property values of the surrounding homes. I don't see any acknowledgement or consideration from the county or the city regarding how this will affect the investments of dozens of residents who have paid a premium to live in this area. I do feel that there are existing structures that could be repurposed in and around Washington County that have better access than this particular site, and I do feel that we have a need and a responsibility as a community to care for those who have lost housing due to circumstances. However I would like to see many more parameters around this proposal before I would be willing to overcome my misgivings about this project that is going to be located in my backyard. Thanks for your time and attention to this issue Nikki DeMeglio 15174 64th St N Oak Park Heights Angela Ross From: Tim Gladhill Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 5:35 PM Cc: Planning Subject: FW: Emergency Housing This message has been blind copied to the Planning Commission. r wa ter T N F 8 1 R T N V l A C F O F Y IN N F SO T A 1 Tim Gladhill City of Stillwater Community Development Director tgladhill(a-)_stillwatermn.gov www.stillwatermn.gov httDS://www.facebook.com/StillwaterMinnesota P: 651-430-8821 Schedule a Meetina **new link** From: Tim Gladhill <tgladhill@stillwatermn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 8:42 PM To: Blake Van Denburgh <blake@felizinc.com> Cc: Katriona Molasky <kmolasky@stillwatermn.gov>; Ben Gutknecht <bgutknecht@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Re: Emergency Housing Blake Thanks for submitting your comments. Would you like your comments included in the official record? I am responding as I am just finishing up after a City Council Meeting. I will respond to a few questions I am able to, but happy to connect tomorrow for more context. No decision has been made and the City Council has some broad discretion in this instance. While not formally approving or lending full support, the City Council acknowledges the need and finds this solution reasonable and prefers it over previous iterations presented. I don't want to oversell our support, but did want to touch on a few specific questions you had. I would defer to Washington County on site selection. Our scope is more limited to whether or not the proposal complies with our Zoning Code. I would also defer to Washington County on any funding questions. The City of Stillwater has not committed any funding to this project. We are only responding to a zoning request. As for stormwater and open space preservation, a couple of layers. The Stormwater plan was discussed at length with the Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization. The reconfigured Stormwater system includes an underground system under the parking lot. As for open space preservation, the scope does not require DNR review. There is no known impact to the NHIS database. Additionally, these are previous residential parcels. I will get you a copy of the traffic impact study. We just received that. Yes, traffic levels will increase compared to today. However, the traffic study indicated that all nodes will operate at a Level of Service A or B, which is extremely high scoring per traffic engineering standards. All written public comment received by the City as part of the official public hearing has been included in the packet. We have not excluded any public comment received by the City. We welcome any and all comments. If Washington County has additional comments, we would welcome including those in the packet. I am not attempting to justify the project, simply state the facts. I will repeat that the City does have some broad discretion to either approve or deny this request. The best advice I can provide is to take the time to comment as part of the public hearing. The Planning Commission and City Council will then need to weigh all of this information to arrive at a final determination. If you feel there is a voice under represented, I encourage them to submit comment to planningdept@stillwatermn.gov or attend tomorrow's public hearing. While the City Council is likely to take public comment when they review, I cannot guarantee that. It is imperative that public comment is submitted prior to or at tomorrow's public hearing. Let me know if there is anything else I can provide. I will reconnect tomorrow with the traffic impact study. Sincerely, Sent from my mobile device. Tim Gladhill Community Development Director City of Stillwater 651-430-8821 tgladhill@stillwatermn.gov From: Blake Van Denburgh <blake@felizinc.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 8:20 PM To: Tim Gladhill <tgladhill@stillwatermn.gov> Cc: Katriona Molasky <kmolasky@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Emergency Housing [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Gladhill and City of Stillwater, My name is Blake Van Denburgh, and I live at 15169 64th St N, Oak Park Heights. I am one of the local residents who will be directly affected if the new emergency housing is approved. While we recognize the need for a service like this in Washington County and are fully supportive, we struggle to understand the rationale behind the chosen location. When asked, the County has been unable to provide a satisfactory answer, only stating that no cities are interested in hosting the facility, hence the decision to place it on county - controlled land. This location lacks access to mass transit and has few to no walkable jobs or facilities that could help these individuals get back on their feet. Although I agree that there is a need for such a facility, this location seems poorly chosen. z Additionally, I am concerned about the removal of the pond and native waterfowl space, as it is a hub for transitory and local wildlife. I am curious if the DNR has been consulted regarding this impact? Moreover, there is a $5 million funding gap in a year when the State Budget is already strained. Where do we plan to secure these additional funds to support this project? Currently, when sitting in our front yard, we notice a significant number of Washington County Government building officials walking through our neighborhood daily, identifiable by their badges. I have asked the county for specifics on the requirements or specifications for individuals who will be utilizing this housing but have not received a response. I would like to understand the specific criteria for utilizing this facility. We also have concerns about the additional traffic flow this will cause. I noticed in the notes that a traffic study was conducted. I would formally request a copy of this study. Lastly, I find it concerning that, of the letters published for the planning commission meeting, only letters of support are included and not letters of concern. Sincerely, Blake Van Denburgh Blake Renner Van Denburgh 763-442-5036 blake felizinc.com 3 I- water 1 H E 8 1 R T H P L A C E O F M I N N E S 0 I A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Katriona Molasky, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-17: Variance request to exceed the required structural impervious surface and facilitate construction of a deck located at 3060 White Pine Way BACKGROUND The Applicants, Samuel and Allision Berndt, are seeking a Variance from the Planning Commission to permit the construction of a deck that would increase the lot's total impervious surface over the allowed 25%. The project area is located at 3060 White Pine Way (PID# 1903020130016) (the "Property") within the TR (Traditional Residential) Zoning District and a Lake Shoreland Management District. The property has frontage on White Pine Way, the rear of the property abuts South Twin Lake, and it has residential neighbors on either side. The project site is an 12,305 square foot residential lot which contains a two-story single-family dwelling and an attached garage built in 2011. Currently, the property has a back doorway leading to nowhere, indicating a future deck was ultimately part of the final construction plans. The proposed action seeks to allow the construction of an approximately 544 square foot deck located behind the house. The addition of the proposed deck would increase the lot coverage to approximately 29.6% (3,642 square feet), an increase of approximately 4.6%. Because the impervious surface coverage requested by the Applicant exceeds the 25% threshold regulated by City Code, a variance is required. ANALYSIS The Traditional Residential Zoning District has no requirements for maximum lot coverage. Lake Shoreland Management District allows a maximum of 25% impervious surface coverage. Currently, the project site is at approximately 25% (3,098 square feet) impervious surface coverage. The project site has no remaining impervious surface that could be used for a deck without the need for a variance. Staff has found that over 500 square feet is on the larger end of the spectrum of many previous decks approved via variance in the past years. The property is part of the Millbrook 7t" addition (the Development). Impervious surface was calculated at 50% for the entire development and coordinated with the watershed districts. Staff cannot find any documents indicating a superseding lot coverage agreement, and as-builts show nearly all homes meeting the 25% impervious surface allowance. This property is bisected by the Brown's Creek and Carnelian -Marine -St. Croix Watershed Districts. Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. FINDINGS: Variance to the Required 25% Structural Impervious Surface Requirement: A. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. i. Finding the request reasonable, at least as it relates to strict compliance of the plain language of the Zoning Code, is questionable. While the request conforms to all other dimensional standards, no additional impervious surface could be permitted by code. ii. Staff does note that at the time of the home's construction, decks were not counted toward impervious surface and would have been able to be added onto the homes without needing a variance. B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. i. The plight of the landowner is due to the Applicant's desire for a deck, which their home was originally built to accommodate with back doors that lead to nowhere. C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. i. Granting the variance to approve the construction of the proposed deck will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The deck will be situated behind the house. Many homes in this development have decks similar to the one being proposed. D. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. i. The request to construct a deck is not based on economic considerations. Staff believes that the plight of the landowner necessitating the variance meets the practical difficulty test as none of the circumstances were created by the property owner and under previous interpretation would have been allowed when the home was built. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the plight outlined by the landowner that they would like to have a deck that their home was built to accommodate but cannot build due to a change in impervious surface interpretation, staff believes this satisfies the required practical difficulty requirements. Staff recommends approval of this request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Variance for Case No. 2024-017 and adopt Resolution PC 2024- 02 adopting findings of approval. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION PC 2024-02 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE STRUCTURAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF 25% AT 3060 WHITE PINE WAY (CASE NUMBER CD2024-017) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a Variance request from Samuel and Allision Berndt ("Property Owner") of 3060 White Pine Way, legally described on Exhibit A ("the Property"), to allow for the construction of a 544 square foot deck, exceeding the maximum impervious surface for structures by 4.6%; WHEREAS, the maximum allowable structural impervious surface in the Lake Shoreland Management district is 25%; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Variance at its May 22, 2024 meeting, held a public hearing and took testimony from the public. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the variance to exceed the maximum allowable structural impervious surface of 25%. The approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: Findings of Fact- 1 . The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 4. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. Conditions of Approval: 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-017 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Applicant shall follow recommendations for stormwater mitigation from the Brown's Creek and Carnelian -Marine -St. Croix Watershed Districts 3. Applicant shall follow all requirements set by the City of Stillwater Building Official for construction of the deck Adopted by the City Planning Commission this 22nd day of May, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER John Dybvig, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Situs Address: 3060 White Pine Way PID:1903020130016 Abstract Property Lot 1, Block 6, Millbrook, Washington County, Minnesota Hi hope all is well. Looking to get a variance to install a deck on the back of our home (3030 White Pine Way). From my knowledge I'm currently at the percentage limit for impervious surface limitations on the property. A few things I have noted are that the home was built with a back door for future deck construction, as well as some changes in the interpretation of impervious surfaces recently. Please see the attached: -Deck Plans -Deck Boards -Deck Railing -Plenty of lot maps with drawings -Impervious Surface Map -Photo of current deck door for future deck -A few other documents. Thanks again for your time and consideration. Sam Berndt 651-323-7715 Sam.h.berndt@gmail.com Deck Plans Scope of Work: • Build new deck off the back side (North Facing) of the house. Footings: • We will install (6) new footings for the deck. • Footings will be 12" sonotubes, filled with concrete, belled to dimensions specified on the drawings. • 48" deep. Posts for Beams: • 6x6 Pine (pressure treated) Beam: • 2 - 2x10 #2 Pine (pressure treated) • Dropped beam Joists: • 2x10 #2 Pine • 16" on center for perpendicular deck boards Decking: • Trex dark brown composite deck boards (Trex Name = Saddle) Railing: • 36" tall aluminum railing (Black, Williams Railing). Layouts of Deck All Dimensions are in Inches Layout 1 Layout 2 Layout 3 House Layout 4 36" Al um in um Railing 2x10 B 6x6 Po Belled Specified on Center 48 5" � 2" h House Layout 5 f- 3.6 6 7.25" " Rise I 1 11.1875" Run Belled to Specified Top Rail 34-38" above nosing of treads STAGGER FASTENERS IN 2 ROWS ,.5" MIN. FOR 2X8' ,.5" MIN. FOR 2 X 10 '.5" MIN. FOR 2 X 12 LAG SCREW 1 3/4" MIN. Ledger attachment Slleatlui►cr «'eathel%-resjs4$jN'e barrier Flashing .� c�_� �1 [(,�'� ,.n I�r ���'i31 f7��L�l. ti �..>G�S.-�`t_� ...:�.%�i :.�...�;Q,"1�:.�s�l �' I I A l l i) r! I I� � � 'T. dY,1. � n � .:.i... ..,. � - _ �, Y�� �� � y�, .'\�� 1'.♦ �p .. iM1+- ���: •f. � .may �.�' .! w� �,-�� . \�� �� _�- �- �'' - . �•\\` � R� ��,��()� j�rawn 1 T2 c& , I � 1) •`J• • I K'J'. rt ' .J . 1 :r • 1 •t wl- 11,aM5 Gv �- I yr P n; n'^'p-' R :•! o R F i 3� '; ria'r ?:T r[ 1 +�8 aR°tor Jp° F•`3j ,P•/ \ � ei I i{6 �� � d 4� �r•�4p'.r''!,,- � •:��; � a ik,�. rr'ara u R �. / \'O I j { �t 4 ig ,•� .rN ary� sF_Ly�Ax'. � ,R\ �//� Vj•��` � \a`'r `n4 I al •i,� rri. . \ \'r '. 4` j`�6 to\'�'':r Q '�, '•3r(r � t.9o3<rr�-I a 'nS� 8PS ` \.D�/ r°. \ `% rs it Y �•1CD Win/ �41�5 �`�. °S� 'to .� 6 \ri %' ice, 1 8 Nawl 1 i : r'• ,'o J 'S E,.., 'ra`' \ �� o �9`,� °r� e o W-"gcl :l � a � •� �•`•N ° .. �.a., u.vn 9 d•••� v V r^ h ,[`,rt�LIS ."�LOta D,zI Y l� � 7� F rr� •y Rio � �^ r. W g l N R ££� �� Ig co 4 s n w — J-3.[3bc.c,.— , s ^ 14 A-7 u o dPat 1 •"rr � rsi 1� 4 1 !rrrr� \ � 8' f ��'r1 ,� .,;$ • MI)•11 ))•t — � V } ` sego �� P• � A ,>... -� 1�,I I (,Y 1 � 1`` .tiD. �` \r ~ J.9r K, r0 t M1. _ �. 't. `ram a A � �• D• <. .. � � �.�. ' � �� AxpO -� f 'dl� 1 (i))[ Dy�,i1\ N .,�\ D. /, �-•., �:�� cp ` •bid, S Q 1 ✓ � � e �M1 �.: 1 .J1 ` � F• (� 1` � / 91�PM1 4 "r'� c n ',:���� �,< wz� � . . \ e a� � l 1 J V � '•''• 'fix z A ri-af ' qe A w ea 9cr O S ^ o°.rra �? �l0.°o.9t fr f I 0 VIOS3NNIW'U31VMllllS d0 A110 �' • "4 AVM 3NId 311HM O90£ wy o a O� w s I J WoP41r(LLO"SIZA— AVNOHBWrCSOGp2 ZA JN1SIf00838-32JHJ.VS I e iZblOS3NNIW 30 2bNN31 k3ANns 30 BIVOI311a30 1 III ItlJV �JIViUYtlJ W pp Y p W. Z V) F 2�0y W Q W'-' Z r 'aYr=i Q 8r $m a. O r o W W y Z y( Q T a; 4 W F p�SQQOJj} 2p a OW OY LLa K d'H 2Q Z Od rYy¢''m O K !L> O bQ W =Z =�o Q �T y J our ~W Ir J W_ p W W 7 m m 8 or Z r m U Z ZxQ U' IQ7Q 4 j U m Y J ) W LL V S W O W K a = pZ W Or O S� p Z Z o w op US FWp a O cLnLn 3 W W JY ¢ uOul _ W F r Q 7 K Q = W f J 0 WpW O = O J O 7 O J 00 � p Z Q W y w O W mZ�a y K = N Q fp KO UO U' u LL Z O ZZ WW� i J LL Z r .10.0. 7 a, Z IL J r m U U Z. O < y<Z_ Zg2 ya FF W W O W 7 O 1Ky W �j` Za N (Q� S r 7 r m Q W a Z p Z Y T m 2 ` S' 7QJ� W W '� Y W y ZF�rZ W i W Y YQU LLC OLV NC YO J <� i i O 2 Z O �i p W Q Z J 6�( O O p j r = Qg O U' m FL r p yO K a t M 7 S m K Z „W, Ul y N Y 0 0 m= F `7g'.• T F IL ( a' `'Zg• N y y LL,m OLL J Z U Q m = W J LLO W y ❑ N y m m y y y m y N y y W y t W J Q W w p y 3 W m Z Z r Z Z W W W W W W O W W W rrcJ mQx V FF(7 �m yOy��O 0 1r� Z� O(,)w z z z z z z z z z z z z z jOGOlii 2Z rp yK a p� W VW QO. W yz� W W 11y� W W W W w W W w w (7 qa.a w O w K J p p O O O G p p p 0 O p p Z �y�p LLy a. W pO U� Dy( J O yr0 WMD �11 OW aj � ay � mS I O C O pF Uyj J j f 7r m S a f K W W r 0 px Q 88 W W JJ J J J y Z4 ^r Q IL m W F K xZ QLLIaL7 Na t7 V YZ Yf 1G a• h =O OJa So . ° 5�� ti� / : ' lb m�� ,pry °�p� % LL 8 �� m� 0 / z � OOP S / cd /p^ 8 ° ° ° °& , jai �`� \\ °a o` Zw w 61 O d \ °h� \� 9 °IFS °�l�e° g \ce,t00 0\ gy �01 ° G .9 b• OWroZ O ^4 Jw10`w� °� b °;b W a ,�4 5 p �, O ti O M ¢� �< A%61. mmc- °� b -� ... .., mmmm \ gnu n nZu % rT�Ya ODE Q N J%W O o Z> Jw bHZ W / \ nZO�wF 02 \ Q Ya n g24FQ as W �Qphy 44 ���Fo jW JLL�ZO W Z W W LL W pm-_W yW �OW� I a$g W o 8 / r;T LL N / m�Q OuIW7aN(Wllawi. Wiiiw �$fr ww U)�Sf� mJO.ama i water THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Ben Gutknecht, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Case No. CD 2024-016: Conditional Use Permit for Indoor Commercial Recreation (Fitness Center) at 107 Chestnut St E DISCUSSION The Owner requests a Conditional Use Permit for Indoor Commercial Recreation to facilitate a proposed tenant who proposes to operate a fitness center in the basement level of this existing building. This is a simple use approval. There are no exterior modifications or expansion of the building in the current proposal. This is a tenant build - out of an existing interior space. Indoor Commercial Recreation is an allowable use as a Conditional Use in this Central Business District. In approving a Conditional Use, the City must adopt the following findings. • The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the Comprehensive Plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations • Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed • The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for Indoor Commercial Recreation at 107 Chestnut St E. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2024- RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR INDOOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION LOCATED AT 107 CHESTNUT STREET EAST (CASE NO. CD2024-016) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received Conditional Use Permit from Matthew Wolf ("Representative") and CVII Holdings, LLC ("Property Owner"), for an Indoor Commercial Recretaion Use consisting of an indoor fitness center, located at 107 Chestnut Street East, legally described as in Exhibit A (the "Property"); and, WHEREAS, on May 22, 2024, the City Planning Commission for the City of Stillwater considered the conditional use permit, held a Public Hearing, and recommended approval of the request.; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City Council for the City of Stillwater considered the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater considered the conditional use permit for an Indoor Commercial Recreation (Fitness Center) at its June 4, 2024 meeting and approved the conditional use permit. The approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed structure or use conforms to the requirements and the intent of this chapter, and of the comprehensive plan, relevant area plans and other lawful regulations; 2. Any additional conditions necessary for the public interest have been imposed; and 3. The use or structure will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. CONDITIONS: 1. Development and use must be consistent with approved plans provided in CD2024- 016. 2. Review and approval by the City Building Department. 3. Review and approval by Fire Department. 4. All minor modification to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Department. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the Planning Commission, or City Council. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Approval of the conditional use permit does not constitute final approval. The Applicant must secure proper permits and approvals from the City prior to construction. Adopted by the City Council this 4th day of June, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Abstract Property Type Situs Address: 107 Chestnut Street East Parcel ID: 28-030-20-42-0107 Lots numbered nine (9) and ten (10) and all of Lot numbered eight (8) except the south twenty four (24) feet thereof, and the west one third (1/3) of Lots numbered one (1), two (2) and three (3) except the north sixty-five (65) feet of the east six (6) inches thereof, all in Block numbered thirty (30) of the original town (now city) of Stillwater, as surveyed, platted and now of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Washington County, Minnesota. "The Underground" Women's strength and conditioning gym in Stillwater. We pride ourselves on intelligent training and programming that leads to lasting results. Discover why our female focused gym provides faster results with more accountability in a safe and inclusive environment! We use an individual approach to group training. Here at The Underground, we split the difference between 1:1 personal training and traditional large group classes. We emphasize education and mastering technique during sessions so that you feel confident both inside the gym and out. Why invest in small group personal training? What makes it unique? The "What" The Underground offers a unique blend of individualized attention and the energy of a small group setting. Clients enjoy personalized workouts tailored to their specific goals and fitness levels. Not all clients will be doing the same exercise variations in each session. We modify the sessions to suit your individual needs and specific goals. This format allows for cost-effective personal training without compromising on quality, ensuring clients receive the guidance and accountability they need to achieve their fitness objectives in a supportive and encouraging environment. "Why it works" We focus on building muscle and strength and care less about the calorie burn and sweat fest that most other group workouts entail. Strength training is one of the best investments we can make in terms of long-term health. Building more lean body mass means improving bone density and joint health, resisting age -related muscle loss (sarcopenia), and maintaining the ability to perform daily activities. It's also linked to many cognitive and emotional benefits, like improved mood regulation, problem -solving skills, feelings of confidence, and self-sufficiency. The longer we participate in resistance training activities, the longer and greater benefits we will experience - you can think of it like compounding interest! It's NEVER too late to start. Our sessions are programmed for continuous progression. This means that there are no random workouts or "workouts of the day" where you're training without intent. Each session is programmed for a purpose and workouts will stay similar for each 4-week training block but progress week to week. This ensures our clients have enough time to improve their technique and confidence with certain exercises and allows for improvement in overall strength and conditioning. —Our sessions are self -paced. As our main goal is to improve strength and work toward body recomposition (reducing bodyfat and building muscle simultaneously), adequate rest is crucial. You are able to rest throughout the sessions as needed which enables you to maintain a greater training performance and focus on technique throughout each of the sessions. We can reduce the risk for injury and maximize results by training with intent and not "for time." Schedule: Group sessions: M — F, 0600, 0900 and 1200. (typical class size of 12-15 people) Semi Private: M — F, 1300 and 1500 Personal Training 1:1— M — F, TBD. Case by Case basis. Capacity: The business will seek to acquire 30 clients during the first six months; followed by an additional 30 from six months to 18 months into business. The business model does not plan to have over 75 clients at any given time depending on the current business model. This is the first concept for equipment layout. There will be additional barbells, weights, and storage. (depiction "up" is South) DocuSign Envelope ID: 5BE3B467-4F46-426F-AE6C-46F57DFB88A9 EXHIBIT A Depiction of Premises (In gray below, including STG 028) 10539172v1 LEGEND CODE DATA - 2020 MN STATE CONSERVATION CODE ACCE59B1E MEANS OF EGRESS LAT EXIT ACCESS WCXI�-Vl �' 2 HOUR FIRE WALL QHC TO6) �1Tr .•--" ] HOUR FIRE WALL (IRE 706) i.. ... � I HOUR FIRE WALL (.BC 1.1 �� ^^ �• I HOUR FIRE BARRIER (BC 707) xr' �Il-J�O 2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER (IBC 7(17) �1-NWW�C�IN ] HOUR FIRE BARRIER (IBC 707) O$•�®e I HOUR FIRE BARRIER (IBC 707) I HOUR SHAFT ENCLOSURE (IBC 713) 2 HOUR SHAFT ENCLOSURE (IBC ]1]) I HOUR FIRE PARTITION (IBC 7p0) ElIW 1 HOUR SMOKE BARRIER (IBC 709) I SMOKE PARTITION (IBC TO) LOWER LEVEL CODE FLOOR PLAN NORTH ,L13 MINNESO CODES:ALILE 02 TA CONSERVATION WOE FOREX@TING B111LONGS 2020 MINNESOF STATE BUILDING COIF 2020 MINNESOTA aCCESSOILItt CODE 02D MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE 2020 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GA-SCOUE 02O MINHESOTA ENERGY CODE 2D17 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE PROJECT SCOPEFORMIS PROJECT IS INE TENANT IMPROVEMENT FOR ME FIRST FLOOR —ANT OFFICE TENANT SPACE I D GREENHALO BUILDS IS ME PROPOSED NEW TENANT FOR THIS TENANT SPACE M15 SPACE WAS THE ORIGINAL DRILL HAL WHEN ME BUILDING WAS CONSTRUCTED FOR ME STILLWATER ARMORY BACK IN 1922 No WROWouD PLUM01NC GR ILVAC WDIEK IS WR0P0'ED IDW nH9 IENAN1 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SINCE THIS WORK WAS COMPLEIED UNDER ME PREVIOUS PROJECT COMMON TOILET ROOMS CONSTRUCTED UNDER TIE PREVIOUS PROJECT A MAJOR RENOVATION OF MI5 HISTORIC 2 STORY BRICK STILLWATER ARMORY BOLDING TOM PLACE IN 2020 TIE BUILDING'S FIRST ROOK IS NOW A MIX OF APARTMENTS (GROUP R-2) AND COMMERCIAL OFFICE SPACE (GROUP B) THE SECOND FLOUR IS APARTMENTS (GROUP R-2) THE BASEMENT IS A MIX BE AMENITY SPACES FOR APARTMENT RESIDENTS AUUITIONAL OFFICE SPREE, STORAGE GARAGE AND UTILITY SPACES THE GARAGE MAINTAINS ITS GARAGE USE WITH PARKING SPACES FOR APARTMENT RE90ExIS THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE OR ME CREENHALO OFFICE TENANT SPACE 110 WILL BE THE EXREHOR WEST SIDE ENTRANCE OF ME BUILDING. WHERE MERE 15 AN EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 70DAY l WEOF CON9TNUCTION: CYCIASMFIGIWXs: OFFICE TENANT SPACES/RINESS APARTMENT UNITS STORAGE AREAS GARAGE MOEDUCCUPANCIES: sR W AAIco DCCI1NNCb0 EOG60A O ADJOINING OCCUPANCIES GROUP B GROUP R-2 GROUP B : GROUP 5-2 GROUP B BUSINESS 6Na(It a-2 *tm Elµ WIOLr •P72 STDMNDE �04" 5-2 31wA0( TANULAR FIRE FIRER TING W71 RATING (.R5) SPRINKLERS (FIRS) 2 la- I HOUR 2 HOUR I 'OUR ALLOWABLE AEA: C40LI11 R-2 M051 CONMOI oct.mm" SCE BGBW IM 7OAVULAS MAXAIUM FLOOR AREA (A,,) = 20.14e SF _MUM BUILDING AREA = 60,432 IF IREA YODfICA11di OR,- sad 1- [AI II) u= 16.000 T 11 fiWB' 2595 1 or (sw 1 eel) A, Tobu TIAl. SOfi 2 (s9up eel) I = A,- i.creose due la bon age os c .-F.le4 Ut, sec 1.2 (X) N3 ..�.,.. 6.awlu 4rw A." 2 p 4 slw s (up e 3 s11. es) 20.N .IT 0 25 I [P , ]0 _ l [2� 021]a _ - 259X 55,. I JO _ E ca m (X) GuA4.ngp , :q20eL pne =- mIe.ny W idl public eoey T01n y . oprn �pce AREA6 LOWER Lf VEI GROUP B (BUSINESS) 1BBJ IF OI¢JN Y-2 (GARAGE) ..a.a SF GROUP 5-2 (SLWAGE) A,7114 SF CIRCULATION ROPOSED LOWER LEVEL AREA ISU57 IF FIRS' BOOR. CROUP B (GUSINE55)-GREENHALO 4.61] SF. GROUP R-2 (RESIDENTIAL) 4,102 SF CIRCULATION PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR AREA 10980 SF sccONG FLODH R-2 (RESIDENTIAL) <.769 IF CIRCULATION I%S.F. ANIWWD MCPAU 1104A AKI, fi]66 SF I H,i � me o. LOWER LEVEL AREA 15,a57 SF FIRST ROCR AREA M,960 IF SECWO FLOOR AREA fi.]fiiL TOTAL BUILDING AREA 32,403 SF -"IE W CMST!FuC1� TYPE III-H FULLY SPRINKLERED BEARING WALLS EXIEOOR 2 HIM (S) MTE!NaW 0 x-R(S) "kUC(URAL AWAME 0 FIOUR(S) R.W CONSMUCTIW (INCLUDING H HWR(S) I.PF—FING BEAMS AND JOSISI ROOF CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING 0 HOUR(5) SUPPORTING BEAMS AND JOISTS) <5 _ xWRS <IO' HOURS 30 5 'OURS < a - 221O -HOURS AHT LOAD CALCULATIONS FC IAsh TI.Mi ir. GROUP B (O 150 5 F /OCC B87 GROUP 1-2 GARAGE (O 200 S F /OCC ) 4.0e0 SF 21 OCC GROUP S-2 (a 300 S F /OCC ) 4,781 SF 16 0CC TOTAL FIRST FLOOR fi3 Dcc tskI niXYL rO9l0.4T_ GROUP B IN ISO SF/OCC) 4,fi17 SF (MEENHALO) ]I OCC GROUP R-2 (@ 200 SF /OCC) 1102 SE 21 0CC TOTAL FIRST FLOOR 52 OCC grr�F a Fu <re�u <�. GROUP R-2 (O 200 SL./OCC) <. ]69 Y 24 B[C IOTA_ SECOND FLOOR 2A OGC EXITSREQUIREMPROMIDED: LOWER LEVEL CROUP B EXITS REWIRED EATS PROWDED 2 ACCESSIBLE EATS PROMIED GROUP S-2 (GARAGE) 1 2 N GROUP S-2 (STORAGE)1 2 1 FIRST FLOOR: GROUP B GREENIALO EXITS REWIRED I EATS PROMDED 2 ACCESSIBLE EATS PROMBED GROUP R-2 1 3 1 4C EATS REUORED EXITS PROlIDED ACCESSIBLE EA]s PIR MA[0 GROUP Rn2 1 2 O OM REOUIREDBIIOV111EQ GROUP B 2fi OCCUPANTS AT 0] /OCC I DOORS AT 33 fi3' _ 3363 2 Dams AT 6B S = I3 7 U GROUP S-2 (GARAGE) 21 OCCUPANTS At a ] /DCC 2 DOWS AT 3216S = .72G GROUP S-2 (SIORAM) Ifi OCCUPANTS AT DI /OCC I OWRS AT 33 BY = 3363' 2 DBMS AT 60 5 = 137 0- FIRST '— GROUP B (GREENHALO) 21 0=10 L7s AI D r/OEC a Dams AT d4W' . 152 D• GROUP R-2 21 OCCUPANTS AT 02-/OCC: I BOOR AT 6B S = 63 5 1 DOM AT 74 S = 71 S SFCOA ROOR GROUP R-2 2A OCCUPANTS AT 02'/OCC 1 DOOR AT 33 6S = ]] BY SECOND FLOOR (STARSI 16 OCCUPARTS AT 0Y/OCG 2 STARS AT AB- = 96- 1 f1AN AT AE A Ar PLUMBING FIXTURE REDUAREMEAMS GROUP B ASSUME A] MEN A2 WOMEN R AssUME 23 MEN. 22 WOMEN FIXTURE MEN, W C MEN. URINAL Eµ LAX WOMEN, WE WOMEN, LAX GRINWxG FOUNTAINS 5 2- REOUIRED I i06T WNxAFo a 2 REWIRED 672fi' PROWDED ] 2 REQUIRED 170 BY PRONGED 6 2' REQUIRED 137 a- PROWOFD A 2- REWIRED IA] PROVIDED a B- REWIRED 336} PROWOED a B' REOUIRED NAG- PROVOEO A5 OCC NOME 2020 REM OD -Al PROJECT INCLUDED ME CWSMCLON OF CWMGR TOILET ROOMS FOR USE By THE BUSNE55 TENANT SPACES OFFICE IENANT SPACE 11Q FOR GREENHALO WILDS. WILL BE USL C THESE COMMON TOILET ROOMS, SO NO TOILET ROWS WILL NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED WAIN MDR TENANT SPACE popes GROUP POPE DESIGN GROUP 767 N. EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 190 ST PAUL, MINNESOTA S5114 651642 9200 WWW POPEDESIGN COM Gf _;PEJ_: 4HAL❑. HISTORIC FIELDHOUSE 34 GREENHALO BUILDS TENANTIMPROVEMENT STILLWATER, MN 107 CHESTNUT STREET EAST STILLWATER, MN 55082 CODE DATA AND LOWER LEVEL CODE FLOOR PLAN ISSUES#XE 11— DATE TENANT REVIEW D7-21.22 PERM(TISSUE 07-25-22 L CEi iY REYs" 04.9-2 CITY REVISIONS 2 10-12-22 Thereby Z,pHIp Thal..al plan orun:alipn, ,TIy di rt .up—i,;i.— d me or under -] direct supervision end h. I. am a duly Licensed Archilecl antler the leers of Iha Stile GFMinnespla GDr¢ale Vlllare DeIe:1D-12-2D22 Lk. No 51570 COAMyENONiOi ]f225.72i2A OAAVw Wy: DTr I:HI[IUO IV mP SHEET Aa.3 L V ,. -, T H E B I R T H P L A C E O F M I N N E S 0 T A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Katriona Molasky, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-18: Variance Request to Front Yard Setback for Accessible Entrance at 522 4th Street South BACKGROUND The Applicant, Wally Nelson on behalf of Simonet Building LLC, is seeking a Variance to the front yard setback from the Planning Commission to permit the construction of a vestibule and accessible entrance on Walnut Street West. The project area is located at 522 4th Street South (the "Property") within the NC (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District and the Neighborhood Conservation District. The property has frontage on Walnut Street West and 4th Street South, has residential neighbors to the North, South, and West with a Public Administration zoned parcel to the East. The project also includes a general renovation of the exterior of the building, including new roof, siding, windows, doors, and faux stone. This has been reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission on May 15th, 2024 and was approved. ANALYSIS The Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District has a front yard setback of 10 feet. The project is requesting a 2.9 feet encroachment into that setback — putting the proposed vestibule and accessible entrance 7.1 feet from the front property line. Due to the current location of the building, there is no way for an accessible entrance to be created without encroaching in the front setback area of 10 feet. Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The proposed accessible addition to the existing building appears to be a reasonable use and is consistent with the requirements of the Stillwater Design Guidelines for the Neighborhood Conservation District. The circumstances are unique to the property in that this generally historic neighborhood pre -dates current zoning regulations pertaining to front yard setbacks. The Variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Finally, the difficulties are not economic considerations alone. The Owner has gone through great lengths to design an entrance that meets accessibility needs and design guidelines. Staff believes that the plight of the landowner necessitating the variance meets the practical difficulty test and constitutes a reasonable accommodation for ADA accessibility. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Planning Commission approve the request as a reasonable accommodation for ADA accessibility. The Heritage Preservation Commission has reviewed this request due to its location in the Neighborhood Conservation District at their May 15t", 2024 meeting and recommended approval of the request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Variance for Case No. 2024-018 and adopt Resolution PC 2024- 03 adopting findings of approval. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION PC 2024-03 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO BUILD IN FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 522 4T" STREET SOUTH (CASE NUMBER CD2024-018) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a Variance request from Simonet Building, LCC ("Property Owner") of 522 4th Street South, legally described on Exhibit A ("the Property") to allow for the construction of a vestibule and ramp 2.9 feet into the required setback; WHEREAS, the required setback in the NC: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District is 10 feet and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Variance at its May 22, 2024 meeting, held a public hearing and took testimony from the public. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the variance to build a vestibule and accessible ramp within the front yard setback. The approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: Findings of Fact: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 4. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. Conditions of Approval: 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-018 presented to the Planning Commission. 2. Applicant shall follow all requirements set by the City of Stillwater Building Official for construction of the vestibule and accessible ramp. Adopted by the City Planning Commission this 22nd day of May, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER John Dybvig, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Situs Address: 522 4th Street South PID:2803020430057 Abstract Property The South 60 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Block Thirty-eight (38) of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. r / G � NORTH / / G - - 841.0 0 10 20 0K\� - 641.2 e X 841.4 842.0 X541.3 X8414 <. 641.7 a \ e \ X 841.6 a \ � X541.5 842 X 842. X 841.1 X 842. s 642.1 \ X q 84\SX 2.0 43.0 , ^ 843.0 \ �Dc X 841.9 X 841.3 m � X840.5 X84 \ 7 885.45 ♦ 1 ' k X844.81.' X 83t.6 16 315 0 6 6 543.4B8 3.Sk cc 8454 -842 N7 \ X 836.8 \ X845.7 e' Q \ PG \ 1--843.0 X538.7 a--845.1-846.2TW 2\•( eIL \ PP i +�p`L I\ \--845.3TW 45.8 �S Q 843.8 X 38.�1 �P \Q�ji 843.5BW 846. /W 845.0 Oa. Q M X840.2 vOU 0X845.E . M ///- 0 GM X84\.6 (A �.0 U \ XS � i G \ CP 3 40.0 m 0 h cP B "a u, X 839.1 •CP / / i- F '� _ A 844.4 d Q) \ 83 0 \ 46.2TW?� 2 I \\ X838 - �U k0� KO��'1 ` ' ',4 - \? / h ' /I _ �� a A OU a\\ -_�a�9 ''' d �. s � da 848.8 X $3q 0a j\A920. s . 45. (0)0-0 SOR <As4393745.6 OU 840.OX 6 845.8 0 846 OTW- ^� VENT q°-- 846.OTW- \� 8467 46.0 8 37 3 OU \ X839.6 \\ Aos Oq 846.OTW-, \ S �p0�00� 0\\ s�� 54 C\ X839.8 \\ \ 0 eM OU / 4= -644.7 X 844. \ i 646' s OU\0� 18. 8 -844.3 \ W � \ �SN0V0 -� Lr? 22" -844.5 \ \ R q - , x \ \ !L \ \ & SA6 62 \\\ , X645.9 844.3�\ X 846.1 h• a . a . O \\ X840.4 R� 40 X846.2 --844.6 g45.\ -844.7 77 X84. � N � o X841.1 84248 elv 843.2TW �0 ��'OU d / . Dc6 00 84 4.1 �`� I -- -843.9BW � 25" 8455 5.3 77 o 842.eaw e4��� X&46.0 06� X �� \'�� 3)Bly� VPI��sGPP �5.462 3 J O 9 X 844� \\ vJ - 4S " 8 00 845.6 /� 44.8TW \ \ _4845.9 T�'/ -845.1 77 C c''845 \\ X843.9 � �\ X845.3 < / 845.6 7 / \ \ OU \ \ A845.7 q>-845.1 G i X845.5 X845.7 \ X845.5 r ^ ��j°845.6 .';. 00 46.0 \ X8 4.9 X�845.4 1 5 6 O" WOO 1 3° 2 645.7 X 845.5 / OU 845 7 17" O 77 c \ / X845.7 00 '-845.2 X845.7 �1�6 \\\ \ 00 / 8456 7 \ DU -845.1 � 7 m 00 / 77 X� OU� 6 00 /.% oU / �NU / FOUND I/4" IRON-'wA 845.4 - - PIPE 1.2 S. & / \ 0.5" W. OF ®845. PARCEL CO2NE2 - / LEGAL DESCRIPTION: \ (AS SHOWN ON WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 4324038) The South 60 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1 /4) of Block \ Thirty-eight (38) of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. \ AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 9,039 SQ.FT. / G / / EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: � LEGEND: / BUILDING = 2593 (IN SQUARE FEET) i FOUND MONUMENT t-t FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION CONCRETE = 241 Q SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE HYDRANT / MARKED RLS N0. 25718 0 PAVERS = 133 CURB STOP ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WALLS = 52 Tz CABLE TV PEDESTAL ®w WATER WELL AC AIR CONDITIONER O WATER MANHOLE L)TV UNDERGROUND CABLE TV / TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS = 3019 E ELECTRIC MANHOLE wn WATER METER U, UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC / = 33.4% (% OF PARCEL AREA) en ELECTRIC METER UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ® ELECTRIC PEDESTAL POST INDICATOR VALVE ou OVERHEAD UTILITY EP �a WATER VALVE eT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER BOLLARD UG UNDERGROUND GAS O LIGHT POLE FLAG POLE > SANITARY SEWER c� � GUY WIRE » STORM SEWER MB MAIL BOX POWER POLE � TRAFFIC SIGN WATERMAIN GAS GAS METEROLE x x FENCE UNKNOWN MANHOLE CURB [TYPICAL] SOIL BORING ,.. ; T TELEPHONE MANHOLE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL �"i�';;::r;�••:e�:�:�:.`=\�:`� :::'c' CONCRETE SURFACE ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL t;;;x:: ..:> co SANITARY CLEANOUT �.. ~..^...�.... CONIFEROUS TREE ®° SANITARY MANHOLE ® of ® CATCH BASIN DECIDUOUS TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE ® or ® STORM DRAIN ® FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE SURVEY NOTES: y 1 . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 1983. 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. DATE OF FIELD TOPOGRAPHY = 1 2-20-23. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLLFREE: 1-800-252-1166 CONTACT: Wally Nelson Morrow Partners, Inc. 612-247-3443 wally@)morrowpartnersinc.com COUNTY/CITY: WASH 1 NGTON CO U 1V�Y C��Y OF S T I t- IFE FR REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 12-26-23 ISSUED CERTIFICATION: OIL I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dante L. Thurmes Registration O*mber: 25718 Date: --I 2_ 26 _23____ PROJECT LOCATION: 5 Z Z 4TH ST_ S _ PID#2803020430057 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651 .275.8969 danC@cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVWN55 PROJECT NO. WN23055 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY G n \ 841 NORTH \ n G - - .0 0 10 20 \.. 0A\6 841.2 X 841.4 1\\ n 842.0 X 841.3 X 8414 �. 841.7 X 541.6 X841.5 842 .a.. O X 842. X 841.1 X 842. s 842.1 \ X q 04V8X 42.0 ° 43.0 \ N� X841.9 \ 43.0 .a. �' d V ■ X 841.3 a �� X840.5 X84 \ I I - - O \ 1.7 845.544 - 3 X844.8' X83i .6 \ o , 1 0" 842.9 co N7 0022 . 6 6 845.3 3'Sx \BRSR a -842 /\ \ 5 E _ X838.8 843.4 X845.7 - < - 843.0 \ X638.7 \\ ,-846.2TW 2\6 c4 ° Ada _ _ `\ •5 �R2 I-845.3TW \ /�/ �45.8 AS Q 843.8 I`+ \ X 38.q _ _ - /���SGPP\ + \-843.5BW 846. /W 545.0 Q°'Q M X 640.2 \1 X 845.E OU \.3 �o M U \ X6 8 .ITW CJP�S�D \ O 5 X 839.1 j oU +�'�� F� /7 r/ Pp �P� _ s ; a44.4 4¢ 4a a d' � /6 o U < r v u m \\ 8396 0 \ <; _ 6.2�\Wlb v- co '2 - /\ \ \ X838 OU O� U� 1 - 4 - \.7 AN ro 4 :d .' a i 83q \ OU I ,$A\.\ NO\ 0 - .1 yv 84 .8 W� d X8 \ R 06 jo \ OU \ - _� 0 g0608 -�� ` "�. p 9�°. 45.6 Q 843A / 0b / 840.0 X \\ ��\\ Q\\�G 6 845.8 � OU \\\ \\ 8 �X\S�\NG VENT q"- \846..OT - \�0 g46� �`- A, 0 - Q 1 U X 839.6 \ A / o jbA 0 0 \\ \ os Oq 846.OTW-, \ I/ s d X 839.8 6 \\ \ �6A\. OU _ /T ( X 84 . \ 840 \\\ s gA6 '�, 46.O �R6,T� -OUP Ol��ASA o .8 4,6.-544.3- g0� \NR5�\ .LS -844.5 C OOOR X846.1�PA662 t�l <.4. � \ • ° �--844.6 �N X 846.2 Z \\ X840.4 g'2 \.0 - />> � X841.1 � 6� 843.2TW OU 845'\ -644.7 �� � X84 . R 2 6'p 842 s �G <�5� ��� �N10 OU 3 8 /4.1 ��� ti��-843.gBW 6.0 PR C 25" / 845 45 � �`� � \\ ,,,,-' e4 842.ae\y ��`� p\NG l\-.S•i ,� -,, I�/ 2 31" S > 16.0 �� 3�8� SCP -845.0 0 p ,, 4� \ 843.78w 846.E a + 46 >> Q X 844.1 \ 4 - OU 845.6 .. O s G �. 44.8TW i)' \ �Tl�� 846.5 \pN0\N ��/ -a45.1 >> X843.9 -\ X8O 45.3 00 O LY 845,6 / > - 845 \\ \\ G C� 3.9 CEP PCtOPMP o� " h� >> o \ \PNO\N 845.8 a 845., G >/ X 845.5 X 845.7 46.0 \\ X 8 4A X�845.4 84 5.8 5 � 6 4 , o � >.6 � \ \ 1 , 1 0 OU--845.1 / ° 845.8 0� \\a� 5� \\\ X84 S 7 3� 2 2 88.7 ° h1 X \ S DLO C o 7 >> > - 17" \\ QF 845.6 1-545.2 / OU -845.1 / \ / 00 >> STANDARD ADA PED RAMP. CONSULT MNDOT 6R \\ XG/OU / >> STANDARD PLATE. EE VV WAIN / �\ UT / / / FOUND I/4" IRON---' 545.4-- G >> >/ . / PIPE 1.2' S. & 0.5 W. OF ®645. PARCEL CORNER / / / / rr PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREAS: 2- 0 SET OFFSET HUB / BUILDING = 2593 (IN SQUARE FEET) / X 1025.0 X 925.0 PROPOSED ELEVATION CONCRETE = 241 �.930PROPOSED CONTOUR PAVERS = 133 g / WALLS = 52 / PROPOSED DRAINAGE CONCRETE REMOVALS = -101 / TOTAL TO REMAIN = 2918 X 985.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEV. / PROPOSED ENTRANCE = 64 / �sF DENOTES SILT FENCE PROPOSED SIDEWALK/RAMP = 174 / EXISTING CONTOURS FRONT STOOP = 101 q3o TOTAL NEW = 274 / EXISTING TO REMAIN + PROPOSED = 3192 = 35.3% (% OF PARCEL AREA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS SHOWN ON WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 4324038) The South 60 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1 /4) of Block Thirty-eight (38) of the Original Town (now City) of Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota. AREA' TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 9,039 SQ.FT. SURVEY NOTES: 1 . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 1983. 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. DATE OF FIELD TOPOGRAPHY = 12-20-23. EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: BUILDING = 2593 (IN SQUARE FEET) CONCRETE = 241 PAVERS = 133 WALLS = 52 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS = 3019 = 33.4% (% OF PARCEL AREA) CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call V TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 LEGEND: FOUND MONUMENT FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION O SET 1 /2" IRON PIPE V HYDRANT MARKED RLS NO. 25718 po CURB STOP ry CABLE TV PEDESTAL ue UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC �w WATER WELL ury UNDERGROUND CABLE TV AC AIR CONDITIONER O WATER MANHOLE E ELECTRIC MANHOLE wn WATER METER uF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC ❑ ELECTRIC METER uT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ® POST INDICATOR VALVE ou OVERHEAD UTILITY eT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ca WATER VALVE uc UNDERGROUND GAS O BOLLARD LIGHT POLE SANITARY SEWER per- FLAG POLE GUY WIRE >> STORM SEWER f1B MAIL BOX POWER POLE WATERMAIN OG GAS MANHOLE O TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE -x FENCE � GAS METER (� SOIL BORING CURB [TYPICAL] T TELEPHONE MANHOLE TRAFFIC SIGNAL Tfl TELEPHONE PEDESTAL:S;r;� ' ,x;i;+,:':?;.>-•`-. CONCRETE SURFACE co SANITARY CLEANOUT CONIFEROUS TREE Oo SANITARY MANHOLE O O CATCH BASIN BITUMINOUS SURFACE or � DECIDUOUS TREE O or ❑ STORM DRAIN ® FLARED END SECTION O STORM MANHOLE CONTACT: Wally Nelson Morrow Partners, Inc. 612-247-3443 wally@morrowpartnersinc.com COUNTY/CITY: WASH 1 NGTON CO U IVY CITY OF ST I L L\/W/-IN T E FR REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 12-26-23 ISSUED CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Dante L. Thurmes Registration iVmber. 2571 8 Date: --I 2_ 26 _23_ _ PROJECT LOCATION: 5 Z Z 4TH ST_ S _ PID#2803020430057 Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. FILE NAME SURVWN55 PROJECT NO. WN23055 SITE/GRADING PLAN (V Q I z O 0 0 Q U) Cy- LLJ z Cy - a 3 0 w Cy- 0 i z O 0 0 Q i U) Cy- LLI z Q a 0 Cy- Cy- N a N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 FLOOR PLAN A2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 SOUTH ELEVATION A2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" rll"lrll / LA - IT - i A Vrf" IVI I'11vvr /1V 1 V nLIJ J I VIVL = PROPOSED WALL = EXISTING WALL = DEMOLISHED WALL COLUMNS SUPPORT NEW OVERHANG ASPFI A 1 T C`"Mij-1 rC` TO N NEW i L_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -J REMOVE EXISTING WINDOWS f HEADER TO REMAIN (a:)DEMOLITION PLAN A2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" n�wL- VVIIV✓\J11 !ILL AS REQUIRED 3 EAST ELEVATION A2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" N0Rth rk REMOVE EXISTING DOOR HEADER TO REMAIN LAJ L A M P E R T A R C H I T E C T S 420 Summit Avenue •�• St. Paul, MN 55102 101 Phone:763.755.1211 Fax:763.757.2849 lampert®lampert—arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDO mi LAWS OF THE ST T(PIIIIE OTA. "IzOt, SI ATURE LEOPE T PRINT 13669 V LICETO U z Z E L W CIO z s� 45 L 0Ce ne N N 0 LF) :2 Copyright 2024 Leonard Lampert Architects Inc. Project Designer: JAMES B Drawn By. JRB Checked By: LL Revisions FLOOR PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 231229-2 CERTAINI BLACK % OR EQUA 1 0 C►A A 0T CIME! CLl A VCC vv vvv 1 %nvc STOREFRONT - BLACK EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION MORROW PARTNERS, INC. L7 7-1 SMART SIDE L.J NDRA GRAY EQUAL w SMART SIDE TRIM DWSCAPE WHITE ~ EQUAL ULDER CREEK FFSTONE MONTOUR - EQUAL Stillwater, Minnesota NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL COLORS NEED TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. I- water 1 H E 8 1 R T H P L A C E O F M I N N E S 0 I A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Katriona Molasky, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-19: Variance request to exceed the required structural impervious surface and facilitate construction of a deck located at 3480 87th Street North BACKGROUND The Applicant, Richard L Beard Sr., is seeking a Variance from the Planning Commission to exceed the 35% allowed impervious surface coverage and permit the construction of an approximately 128 square foot deck. The project area is located at 3480 87th Street North (PID# 1903020240039) (the "Property") within the TR (Traditional Residential) Zoning District. The property has frontage on 87th Street North and has residential neighbors on all sides. The project site is a 9,152 square foot residential lot which contains a single -story single-family dwelling and an attached garage built in 2020. The Property was built with a door to a small stairway leading to the backyard. The proposed action seeks to allow the construction of an approximately 128 square foot deck located behind the house. The addition of the proposed deck would increase the lot coverage to approximately 36% (3,319 square feet), an increase of approximately 1 %. Because the impervious surface coverage requested by the Applicant exceeds the 35% threshold regulated by the City Code and Development Agreement, a variance is required. ANALYSIS The Traditional Residential Zoning District has no requirements for maximum lot coverage. The property is part of Nottingham Village (the Development) which allows 35% impervious surface coverage for each lot. This was part of the original development agreement that was reviewed by the Brown's Creek Watershed District. The project site was built to 35% (3,191 square feet) of impervious surface coverage. The project site currently has no remaining impervious surface that could be used for a deck without the need for a variance. Staff has found that under 200 square feet is on the smaller end of the spectrum of proposed decks approved via variance in the past years. Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. FINDINGS: Variance to the Reauired 35% Structural Impervious Surface Reauirement: A. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. i. Finding the request reasonable, at least as it relates to strict compliance of the plain language of the Zoning Code, is questionable. While the request conforms to all other dimensional standards, no additional impervious surface could be permitted by code. B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. i. The plight of the landowner is due to the Applicant's desire for a deck. While the home has doors to a small stairway, and could accommodate a deck, staff believes the applicant was the original home buyer and was involved in the original design of the home that maximized current lot coverage. C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. i. Granting the variance to approve the construction of the proposed deck will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The deck will be situated behind the house. Many homes in this development have decks similar to the one being proposed. D. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. i. The request to construct a deck is not based on economic considerations. Staff believes that the plight of the landowner necessitating the variance does not meet the practical difficulty test as the circumstances were created by the property owner during the original design of the home and no change in impervious surface interpretation has taken place since the time of the home build. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the plight outlined by the landowner that they would like to have a deck that their home cannot accommodate based on impervious surface requirements, staff believes this does not satisfy the required practical difficulty requirements. Staff recommends denial of this request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to deny the Variance for Case No. 2024-19 and adopt a resolution adopting findings of denial. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION PC 2024-04 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE STRUCTURAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF 35% AT 3480 87T" STREET NORTH (CASE NUMBER CD2024-019) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a Variance request from Richard L. Beard Sr. ("Property Owner") of 3480 87th Street North, legally described on Exhibit A ("the Property"), to allow for the construction of a 128 square foot deck, exceeding the maximum impervious surface for structures by 1 %; WHEREAS, the maximum allowable structural impervious surface in Nottingham Village (the Development) is 35%; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Variance at its May 22, 2024 meeting, held a public hearing and took testimony from the public. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the variance to exceed the maximum allowable structural impervious surface of 35%. The approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: Findings of Fact: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 4. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. Conditions of Approval: 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-019 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Applicant shall follow recommendations for stormwater mitigation from the Brown's Creek Watershed District 3. Applicant shall follow all requirements set by the City of Stillwater Building Official for construction of the deck Adopted by the City Planning Commission this 22nd day of May, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER John Dybvig, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director 1W14:11:]1r_1 Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Situs Address: 3480 87t" Street North PID:1903020240039 Abstract Property Lot 2, Block 3, Nottingham Village, Washington County, Minnesota +�r.r s.� kw J.P, F'G I o V 2- 4-z4- zaz4- S'T'( - i .L A T CR L i TY PL-A M N C' R 21 & '5'rP 0r Nc MTf-i ST'ILLWATE R y MN 1 5568Z 50UGH-r A 1-iou:5 iN 'THC i�1cTTttA6l4AM Q.C=VL LorML N T its 24>20 :i W.O".iLD LIKC icy A('Pi-Y rQR A VARtANr-C To THG 35% i0e6M\Jiou5 c(-OV RA & R Q ul f RC: M iz N T ? 1 t-I vR Nl —(t To A o p A iU 'x fog ne cf< warm A ` ' LJIDC SrA(R5 De: se_cw c)N4 FRaM n(FC.FC LE: qL'L 'To 6Ro0(Qb LL•IV UC. 6 ' i t•4 C WORTH S0C OF MY HOME . M VQDLFi 5 ANID Z"kU- PuRPvsC' OF TOC 1MPLRva0uS CO�QiFRAGC i 5 -ro ALLDW r'GR ADC"'OuNrC Si'aJRMWA-j'`Cj7 M/�NACrtML-N'i'.. : iti1T'C`-10 -`a 0,4-5rlL1, A MAW-r 'NAQU -FRC=V DECK U.Wrl-{ A PC67-MrVABLE LANDSCAPC &F r'AGR(C AWD ROCK f3C ),aC-R'Trl -rt4C AGC(< . *-I-(44' pict< f3vARnS W(LC. S SPAC D FAI: &'J6uGri AFART L (3nsL'D 6f4 YduR RErCLW" IIiENATi OW i ` o A LLc)LJ L.3A-'C R 'TU f2LO4,J -rd T-i� Ract< RtLow �- wiiiCii IS A PCRMEA� SURi=ACE', T 6G LI rr\IC iF•IAr A D«K of 114 15 MODeSi SiZG 15 AVfe-OpR1ATiF FOR MY SiN6Ll: {'AMaLY d0MLT A► m NEIGiHBOR(NG HOMO S, ) /AND WiLt, kicv; /aLj (;'g T VAC COARACT-L=,a fa' x io' Dc:cK wiLL ALLOW 9000 Fog A fiikLL_Cr ) 'TABLC•: Atln f>67 2- 47- 2 A tm� 1, _06 YL.D D__$ --- t>VKCWC-THUF WAR IA_t-A0f%ATj-45, FIR 1-., 13CFAP-0 SR ION I III I I I I I II �co .Tr4 cJA-i L pota t>dce lt' I ► —_ �' , . �. — ►� r---___._. ��JC °mot. o C lk J p u O I 1 I A I _ .� _� i � i � I l I I � I I Nj vt/l�� L,rx Sri TTA►RS I IIII I. ► 1 I _ I H64AG ra - "' T PFN_oIL I 1 ,(,� 1 �r,C ITT I- J V I I1 C 1 i �r00 u_LATL.P ft � OVA 17. CIS try I I - -I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I III I III I II JA o6 Imo-; ! � , c'o f� o c, I� I�[ I f i l 10 Oni i i ! i - ----------------------- REAR ELEVATION 1/ IS O 4 Q OD VO� LEFT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" RICsI-IT ELEVATION 1/8 I O Copyright for these drawings Is os+„red by Plorsw MN, Inc. Upon poyment of all fees due to Plano MN, a limited license Is granted to use these plot, to tKi ld one structure. plonco MN reserves all Yahts-These plans may not be nrawd for any addlkl,ml structure ms. ay not be assigned m copied. aryd may not I modified o, used in arry redesign WlthaR the prior written consent of Plano MN, Inc © Planco MN, Inc. 2020 G_:v5 a T171 -41=-L G_-55 0 -�!^ P IE_ FRONT ELEVATION IIT = I' -Or l5t FLR. 1,132 SGI. FT, ,ALL DOOR Al WINDOW WEADERS g' CEILING 6 FIRST FLOOR B5M'T 1,131 SCr• FT, TO BE S.F-f- -2 OR BETTER 9' POURED FOUNDATION TOTAL 2065 56. FT. 020-146 5MA z O v! Qz WO .4U U a�o � LL �z Z W v0 W z ir 76 I o;p. 90 J a � V; IA .C. v d•• \ G y r t,� �� ,• n u 1 r V JQ ca ` % 7 U I I ti I ' IL I I'I I 4 I 30.... 30I-- 1,} OC - - - I I c; t3' ail S 89"57'57' E 129 94 4f------------ I S 89'59'55" E 151.34 ~ i I — — — — — — — — — — — — I I c 5 - _ Wx %' 9C) ,i0'OI)_' V_143 68 1 to �— — S 89 '55'57' E ' 36 8-1 — — _ _ — —`� -- — ' II? f co I — — -- --- — .... . ? ....... -�10�� 6657 I Tic, • - - -. ..... I 7027 I al 00 a _00"'-0" — 140 .. 3.......I.... ..JII... 30 ti —51 _J= L u I I A^ S 90 0030''I 140_39 rr; I - N 88 56-9 1-o' 12.E r6 ! 87TH STREET NORTH,.,, N C558 56' 19" vv 17C.53 11 1 tems�fi wr The Birthplace of Minnesota May 10, 2024 Richard L. Beard Sr. 3480 87th St. N. Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: 3480 87th St. N. Variance Request Dear Richard Beard, City Staff reviewed the Variance request application for the above property pertaining to a proposed 128 square foot deck. The proposed Variance request is to allow 36% of structural impervious where 35% structural impervious surface is required. Prior to submitting the application, Staff noted that a variance request of this nature would have a low likelihood of approval. This is specifically due to the existing conditions likely not meeting the Practical Difficulty requirements, and it would be difficult for Staff to recommend support for the variance request. This low likelihood was reiterated when the application was submitted on April 24, 2024. A variance application to exceed the permissible impervious surface by 128 square feet was submitted April 24, 2024. While the request is ultimately reasonable, upon review of the variance application, staff did not find that the request met the "practical difficulty" test required to grant a variance. Staff would like to note that the property owner is well within their right to request a variance. Based on the application materials submitted, Staff will be recommending denial of the variance to exceed the impervious surface requirements. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions. Katriona Molasky City of Stillwater Assistant City Planner 216 4th Street North, Stillwater Minnesota — 651-430-8800 — www.stillwatermn.gov From: Bruce Batchelor <bpbatchelorl@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2024 10:24 AM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Case number CD 2024-019 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This case is for our immediate neighbor, Richard Beard, at 3480 87th Street North in Stillwater. We have no objection whatsoever regarding his wanting to add a deck to his house. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Bruce Batchelor 3484 87th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 612-709-8652 Date: May 22, 2024 To: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners From: Edward Otis, neighbor, and city resident 12070 87m Street Circle North Stillwater, Minnesota Subject: Case No. 2024-19 Variance request to exceed the required structural impervious surface and facilitate construction of a deck located at 3480 87th Street North. Background I purchased and built my home in 1994-1995, in the community of Stillwater Township. Like my neighbor Richard L. Beard, it was to live in until I was no longer able. I also built a one- story rambler enabling all living activities on one floor to accommodate aging at home. During my family's residency our property was annexed into the City of Stillwater. Having attended and participated in many meetings and public hearings, wanting concrete answers and plans, this issue before you now bring back the words of then Mayor Jay Kimble "It's just a plan". These words resulted in many changes, form of government and representatives, land and zoning code changes, density of developments, environmental, Light, noise, traffic, taxes, etcetera. All those continue today and will continue. As a side comment I have found that if you want to make God smile, plan your life. Analysis I fully support the RESOULTION PC 2024-04 approving the variance request for the following reasons: 1. Individual plans like government plans can and will change, due to changing health circumstances. 2. All consequences of those plans are not known at the time of development and information errors can be made by all participants. 3. A previous identical variance for a larger deck was approved at 3490 87th St. N. which abuts Richard L. Beards property to his north (rear property line). Approval was given by the planning commission by consent June 22, 2022. That approval allowed for mitigation plan of excess water from another part of property. 4. A similar mitigation plan was approved for abutting property. This plan would require less mitigation due to the smaller deck size. Requiring 128 square foot deck multiplied by 1.1 would produce approximately 140 gallons of water is a very small amount easy mitigated being able to handle a hundred -year rain fall event in 24 hours. 5. As cited in Katriona Molasky's May 22, 2024, letter to the Planning Commissioners states that the Minnesota State Statue Chapter 462.357 requires cities to consider its standards. While known as the 'practical difficulty'test, it allows for your interpretations and applications, it is not a rigid or mandatory compliance. FINDINGS: Va anc-eto theRequirea-a5%QSS.ru-ctural Impen ous Sur�QBQ-qulrement: A. The Traditional Residential Zoning District has no requirement for maximum lot coverage. The 35% impervious surface requirement for Nottingham Village is then a variable (many would claim arbitrary) requirement. Since a similar variance has been approved with mitigation, that problem has been solved. B. Richard L. Beard is the original home buyer; he is not the original landowner nor the developer or anyone involved in developing this property. He is just a man who had a dream to buy land in this development build a home that would meet his needs for the rest of his life. He does not work 40 hours or more each week dealing with all the facets of city codes and ordinances. Instead, he relies on all the professionals employed by the city and licensed contractors to make his dream come true. Due to the complexities of all the intricacies can make errors. Such as why would the builders add a Leger board to accommodate a deck and the city inspector miss such a glaring discrepancy? If Richard were not the original owner would a variance be granted? C. Due to the first draft of the packet material for this hearing being different from the second packet material I have provided a copy of the first packet and ariel maps providing you a visual observation of the neighborhood. D. Economic considerations are not the only consideration, it is by far the number one consideration for all homeowners. Another consideration is life cycle housing. Combining these together is enormous to Richard. He has already invested in Stillwater over $600,000.00 to be a resident. He is contributing over $7,600.00 annually to support his community. Due to inflation and increases in interest rates it has become cost prohibitive for Richard to relocate to meet his continued health needs. All Richard is asking for is a variance to accommodate his changing health by spending more of his money for permits, decking materials, mitigation cost and increased property value resulting in higher taxes to support his community. Thank you for your time and consideration for approving this variance request. Respectfully, Edward Otis DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Katriona Molasky, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-19: Variance request to exceed the required structural impervious surface and facilitate construction of a deck located at 3480 87t" Street North BACKGROUND The Applicant, Richard L Beard Sr., is seeking a Variance from the Planning Commission to exceed the 35% allowed impervious surface coverage and permit the construction of an approximately 128 square foot deck. The project area is located at 3480 87t" Street North (PID# 1903020240039) (the "Property") within the TR (Traditional Residential) Zoning District. The property has frontage on 87th Street North and has residential neighbors on all sides. The project site is a 9,152 square foot residential lot which contains a single -story single-family dwelling and an attached garage built in 2020. The Property was built with a door to a small stairway leading to the backyard. The proposed action seeks to allow the construction of an approximately 128 square foot deck located behind the house. The addition of the proposed deck wourdl_r crease the lot coverage to approximately 36% (3,319 square feet), an increase of approximately 1 %. Because the impervious surface coverage requested by the Applicant exceeds the 35% threshold regulated by the City Code and Development Agreement, a variance is required. ANALYSIS The Traditional Residential Zoning District has no requirements for maximum lot coverage. The property is part of Nottingham Village (the Development) which allows 35% impervious surface coverage for each lot. This was part of the original development agreement that was reviewed by the Brown's Creek Watershed District. The project site was built to 35% (3,191 square feet) of impervious surface coverage. The project site currently has no remaining impervious surface that could be used for a deck without the need for a variance. Staff has found that under 200 square feet is on the smallgr end of the spectrum of proposed decks approved via y_a 'dance i11 the_ ast years. - - Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The.yariance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. tl FINDINGS: Variance to the Required 25% Structural Impervious Surface Requirement: A The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. i. Finding the request reasonable, at least as it relates to strict compliance of the plain language of the Zoning Code, is questionable. While the request conforms to all other dimensional standards, no additional impervious surface could be permitted by code. B The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. i. The plight of the landowner is due to the Applicant's desire for a deck. While the home has doors to a small stairway, and could accommodate a deck, staff believes the applicant was the original______ home buyer and was involved in th on inal design of the home that maximized current lot coverage. C The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. i. Granting the variance to approve the construction of the proposed deck will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The deck will be situated behind the house. Many homes in this development have decks similar to the one being proposed. D. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. i. The request to construct a deck is not based on economic considerations. Staff believes that the plight of the landowner necessitating the variance does not meet the practical difficulty test as the circumstances were created by the property owner during the original design of the home and no change in impervious surface interpretation has taken place since the time of the home build. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the plight outlined by the landowner that they would like to have a deck that their home cannot accommodate based on impervious surface requirements, staff believes this does not satisfy the required practical difficulty requirements. Stiff recomme_ nds denial of this request. � -� ACTION REQUESTED Motion to deny the Variance for Case No. 2024-19 and adopt a resolution adopting findings of denial. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION PC 2024-04 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE STRUCTURAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF 35% AT 3480 87T" STREET NORTH (CASE NUMBER CD2024-019) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a Variance request from Richard L. Beard Sr. ("Property Owner") of 3480 87th Street North, legally described on Exhibit A ("the Property"), to allow for the construction of a 128 square foot deck, exceeding the maximum impervious surface for structures by 1 %; WHEREAS, the maximum allowable structural impervious surface in Nottingham Village (the Development) is 35%; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Variance at its May 22, 2024 meeting, held a public hearing and took testimony from the public. NOW THEREF R€ IT RESOLVED that the Planning_GQmm.isiof� of the City of Stillwater hereby_ proves he variance to exceed the maximum allowable structural impervious surface of o. he approval of the variance is subject to the fQll,Qwi,ng conditions: m Findings of Fact: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 4. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. Conditions of Approval: 1. Plans, must. be consistent -.With the_materials prese-nted as part of Case No. CD 2024-019 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Applicant shall follow recommendations for stormwater mitigation from the Brown's Creek Watershed District 3. Applicant shall follow all requirements set by the City of Stillwater Building Official for _construction of the deb Adopted by the City Planning Commission this 22" day of May, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER John Dybvig, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Situs Address: 3480 87th Street North PID:1903020240039 Abstract Property Lot 2, Block 3, Nottingham Village, Washington County, Minnesota ff-) I 4 - z 4,- Zoz 4 S Tf 1- A TC- C- I -Fy I-t-/A t,- t,,4 C P, .-T ftO�A,(H-F A iN 'TIVIC F)CkiC-LC,PMC:-Kl T it,a :2�0210 . -r A('rL-Y f-6f,' A VAIZiA�,kCC -1-0 1-14C jtoeCjZVJ&,j5 (f3' Pt 'L-K W(T',4 A -1+'�.itDC FROM PcFcK L4,-4L-7L'-rc) 6ROL,(,jb L,C,'\jC't. ot4 'TIAC' NOR�Tll -5401�� OF O'Y' JIOMC' uQwiz-5-FANo Tki.:- rL-,Kt-S'L- oF Tj4 its rL--Root2s ,CC,,jL':'(ZA6- L' 5 70 i. i i. J--Ctz, APC`C�vA-M' -T L,WrO A FC-C,"krAP5LL! LANIO-:�ie-APC OP F-Ar�R�C At,)b A C VA c C 1) rz-A 4�'W 6 U 6 0 A PA P: Ti v 77-W' Roc K F14 CL&tj — Lot'i I c, ji IS A Pt�-fk 0 C A 9 LC K FA C E, -T- (35 67' L- I C \1 C Tf 4 A r A D L-A- K v r —I t-i 1 7; tv I v t) c > r ,s I z 6-, IS ^('rULC:PRlA-rV r--C)r, C-ii A k-/� C'T'C- —pi L � r Ljil-L AL.L-C-4,4L KC70f-I VOK A 6k,4L4, A,-Ib r6 z a-r-z C'N r hlni ��.iA'-, %It3 4, i,j W.1 f. INJ ONO 4C x she OF, LL ti qr :13 /0' Ire, -', t oc. 11 OA i4 F NO1ionN19NO:D WVOHVNIIION :80-A aDN3GIS38 x V; T-T-1 mi r ly 1� -4, 0 r-4 0 N z 2 0 CL u s 7 i i_ I i Lu W 00 i t TH STREET (NORTH I 1 r I ter Tho Birthplace of Mifinesctat May 10, 2024 Richard L. Beard Sr. 3480 8711 St, N. Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: 3480 87th St. N. Variance Request Dear Richard Beard, City Staff reviewed the Variance request application for the above property pertaining to a proposed 128 square foot deck. The proposed Variance request is to allow 36% of structural impervious where 35% structural impervious surface is required. Prior to submitting the application, Staff noted that a variance request of this nature would have a low likelihood of approval. This is specifically due to the existing conditions likely not meeting the Practical Difficulty requirements, and it would be difficult for Staff to recommend support for the variance request. This low likelihood was reiterated when the application was submitted on April 24, 2024. A variance application to exceed the permissible impervious surface by 128 square feet was submitted April 24, 2024. While the request is ultimately reasonable, upon review of the variance application, staff did not find that the request met the "practical difficulty" test required to grant a variance. Staff would like to note that the property owner is well within their right to request a variance. Based on the application materials submitted, Staff will be recommending denial of the variance to exceed the impervious surface requirements. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions. Katriona Molasky City of Stillwater Assistant City Planner 216 4th Street North, Stillwater Minnesota — 651-430-8800 — www.stillwatermn.gov From: Bruce Batchelor <bphatchelorl = Lmaii.cpm> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2024 10:24 AM To: Planning Dept<planniiVdept6i)stil_Iw_�ter1_n.g v> Subject: Case number CD 2024-019 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This case is for our immediate neighbor, Richard Beard, at 3480 87th Street North in Stillwater. We have no objection whatsoever regarding his wanting to add a deck to his house. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Bruce Batchelor 3484 87th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 612-709-8652 Property Viewer https:�;`wcmn.ulaps.arcois.corn!apes'n�ebappvie�i•er,�index.himl'?id=... 100ft loading... Property Viewer Layer List Layers AddressPoirits Parcels Cadastral Transportation Boundaries Elections Elevation ParksRec Water Aerials2023 Aerials2014 Aerials20l / Aerials2020 4 1 I o t l 5/20/2024, 12:30 PM Propaly Viewer hops:"wcnul.maps.arcgis.com'apes!�iebapp��iewer/index.html'?id=... Property Viewer 60ft loading... l of 1 5%17-2024, 4:03 PM I "I -ol-m-[v Viewer ht tp,,:;" \VC11 In Capps Property Viewer 3480 871-H ST N, CITY OF � X 0, Show search results foi 3480 8 60ft loading... .'OWN., k� 4-1 4-1: I of t 5/120/2024, 12:23 PM Property Viewer Mips: '�.vcmn.maps.arcg is.con-�apps�webappvic�ver;'index.html?id�... Property Viewer + ` 8480 40ft loading... l of 1 5i I 2024, 4:06 PM Property Viewer littns:,"!wcmtl.mahs.arcgis.con'1%apps�webappriewer/iriciea.lrtm]'?id=... Property Viewer 3480 87TH ST N, CITY OF X C� Show search results for 3480 8... 60ft loading... 1 1 0l 1 5/20/2024, 12:24 PM y � t •tip j. a i4 1 � 7 111 Ad . ow — — - - —., . a . AN-O"'AW-VOOR.M. 9 F U O (D 4 0 rr, -0 OD 0N W (N C\j v) ul 0 2u 03 In c u __T -Li is -Li v, 2 m < M rG E (a) di < 1 1wa ter N t 6 1 A r H° A I ! 0' M I N N F I 0 A DATE: May 22, 2024 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Katriona Molasky, Assistant City Planner SUBJECT: Case No. 2024-20: Variance request to exceed the required structural impervious surface and facilitate construction of a pool located at 3085 Lowell Ct BACKGROUND The Applicant, Ground FX Lawn and Landscaping (the Contractor), are seeking a Variance from the Planning Commission to permit the construction of a pool in the backyard of 3085 Lowell Court, increasing the total allowed structure impervious to 49.6% coverage. The project area is located at 3085 Lowell Court (PID# 1903020120040 ) (the "Property") within the TR (Traditional Residential) Zoning District and a Lake Shoreland Management District. The property has frontage on Lowell Court and has residential neighbors on all sides. The project site is a 7,907 square foot residential lot which contains a two-story single-family dwelling and an attached garage built in 2012. ANALYSIS The Traditional Residential Zoning District has no requirements for maximum lot coverage. Lake Shoreland Management Districts allow a maximum of 25% impervious surface coverage. Currently, the project site has approximately 40% (3,190 square feet) of impervious surface coverage, which is over the allowed coverage. The original As - Built shows the property with a main dwelling, driveway, and small walk at approximately 25%. Since original construction a deck and patio have been added behind the main dwelling. The project site currently has no remaining impervious surface that could be used without the need for a variance. The property is part of the Millbrook 5th addition (the Development). Impervious surface was calculated at 50% for the entire development and coordinated with the watershed districts; primarily with Brown's Creek Watershed. This property is in the Carnelian - Marine -St. Croix Watershed District. Staff cannot locate records indicating a superseding lot coverage agreement, and as-builts show nearly all homes at the 25% impervious surface allowance. Staff acknowledges that since the time of this development there has been a change in impervious surface interpretation that now includes decks as part of impervious surface calculations, when they were not at the time of this development. Staff also acknowledges that there are two instances of pools being approved in this development that put their respective lot coverage over the 25% allowed in Lake Shoreland Management Districts. The proposed action seeks to allow the construction of an approximately 840 square foot pool and deck located behind the house. The proposal involves removing the current 375 square foot concrete patio and repurposing that space for a portion of the pool deck. The addition of the proposed pool and decking, with the removal of the current concrete patio, would increase the lot coverage to approximately 49.6% (3,655 square feet), an increase of approximately 9.6%. In addition, the applicant also designed a drain tile system to direct stormwater run off from the front of the property though the system to mitigate a portion of the additional impervious surface. Because the impervious surface coverage requested by the Applicant exceeds the 25% threshold regulated by City Code, a variance is required. Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. FINDINGS: Variance to the Required 25% Structural Impervious Surface Requirement: A. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. i. Finding the request reasonable, as it relates to strict compliance of the plain language of the Zoning Code, is questionable. While the request conforms to all other dimensional standards, no additional impervious surface could be permitted by code. The lot is already over allowed impervious surface. B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. i. The plight of the landowner is created by landowner's desire for a pool and not unique to the property. C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. i. Granting the variance to approve the construction of the proposed pool will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The pool will be situated behind the house. A few other homes in this development have pools similar to the one being proposed. D. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. i. The request to construct a pool is not based on economic considerations. Staff believes that the plight of the landowner necessitating the variance does not meet the practical difficulty test nor is it unique in its physical characteristics. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the plight outlined by the landowner that they would like to have a pool that their property does not have the additional impervious surface allowed to accommodate the project, staff believes this does not satisfy the required practical difficulty requirements. Staff recommends denial of this request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to deny the Variance for Case No. 2024-20 and adopt a resolution adopting findings of denial. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION PC 2024-05 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE OF 25% AT 3085 LOWELL COURT (CASE NUMBER CD2024-020) WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater received a Variance request from Tom and Kristen Opitz ("Property Owner") of 3085 Lowell Ct, legally described on Exhibit A ("the Property"), to allow for the construction of an 840 square foot pool, exceeding the maximum impervious surface for structures by 24.6%; WHEREAS, the maximum allowable structural impervious surface in the Lake Shoreland Management district is 25%; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Variance at its May 22, 2024 meeting, held a public hearing and took testimony from the public. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Stillwater hereby approves the variance to exceed the maximum allowable impervious surface of 25%. The approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: Findings of Fact: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality; and 4. The variance is not based on economic considerations alone. Conditions of Approval: 1. Plans must be consistent with the materials presented as part of Case No. CD 2024-020 presented to the Planning Commission 2. Applicant shall follow recommendations for stormwater mitigation from the Carnelian -Marine -St. Croix Watershed District 3. Applicant shall follow all requirements set by the City of Stillwater Building Official for construction of the pool Adopted by the City Planning Commission this 22nd day of May, 2024. CITY OF STILLWATER John Dybvig, Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director 1W14:11-3Ir_1 Legal Description of the Applicant's Property Situs Address: 3085 Lowell Ct PID:1903020120040 Abstract Property Lot 3, Block 3, Millbrook 5t" Addition, Washington County, Minnesota jos ■ra a pe Q7 LAN DSCAPE�DESIGNSTUDIOS From the desk of David Sonka, MNLA CP. Landscape Design Studios, White Bear Lake, MN February 14, 2024 CONTACTS AND SPECIALISTS INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT PROPOSAL: Contacts: DAN BARTON - ROYAL POOL AND SPA RYAN ZWONITZER - GROUND FX LAWN AND LANDSCAPE DAVE SONKA - LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIOS ADAM WALRAFF - WALRAFF ELECTRIC BOBBY ADAMS - CONCRETE DESIGN Address: 3085 LOWELL CT. STILLWATER, MN Dear City of Stillwater Planners, Planning Commission, Community members; Here is more informaton regarding the project being reviewed at 3085 Lowell Ct., as we hope to help the opitz family find a solution for fulfilling their dream of putting in a small in -ground swimming pool in their back yard. The site is fitted for a inground pool of 14 x 30' that will have a minimal -sized pool deck around it for a walking border that covers the foundation and footing braces of the pool and encloses the auto -cover box on the far end of the pool, as well as encapsulates the skimmer and plumbing lines for the pool so that all is protected for long- term sustainability of the pool. The pool deck concrete will connect to the existing patio below the deck and also have a small sitting area possible in the location of a current patio, that is to be dramatically reduced in size, so that it can have supervised swimming right near the shallow end. As the pool and small concrete patio makes the lot impervious reach just under 50% hard cover, we are taking steps to direct the stormwater from the back half of the house that flows into the gutter and downspouts into a drain tile system. This drainage system will discharge safely away from the pool into a large infiltration zone, similar to a septic drain field, that allows an area of 390 sq. ft. x 18" deep to receive the storm water in the ground and percolate into the soils, with an excess being able to leave the drain the system through a surface exit grate, as shown in the location on the plan. This will allow much of the water from the roof area of the house to successfully enter into the soils on site, to help offset the rate of flow from this property into the neigborhood stormwater infrastructure. Please see the attached application materials and let me know if you have questions as we hope to have this all set and ready to go for discussions on how to help this pool and landscape solution become a success. Best regards, Dave Sonka MNLA CP Landscape Design Studios 651-239-6460 dave@landscapedesignstudios.com OPTION A -CONNECT POOL DECK TO PATIO BELOW THE DECK (ALREADY PART OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION) TO MAKE A CONTIGUOUS POOL DECK AREA AND PATIO. LOT AREA HOUSE, DRIVEWAY, PORCH, WALKWAY 7,360 5F UNOFFICIAL 2,525 5F DECK 2q0 5F (CONC. PATIO 15 BELOW) PATIO (WILL BE REMOVED) ADDED? 21815 SF OR 38.2 PERCENT WITH CONCRETE THAT HA5 BEEN REMOVED IL POOL, POOL DECK, CONCRETE 840 5F DECK TO BE REMOVED (NOT PLANNED, - 2q5 5F) ADDED TOTAL IS . ...... ._........ 840 5F OR 31655 5F OR 4g66 PERCENT. Lnvyn f TOPS It KRI 3085 Lowe Stillwater, I PL Commn Name er Plants ALLITI, SUMMER BEAU GR. CALAMAGROSTIS, GR NELICTOTRICNON, GR. MI5CANTNU5, GRAB HEM., RUBY 5TELLA JUNIPER, WICHITA BLUE NINEBARK, DIABOLO NINEBARK, DIABOLO SPIREA, GLOW GIRL ARK, DIABOLO PL FENCE 18 HEM., RUBY STE Dv ORATE Yltl�...c•IINt "Up"I, Rom W IRVE mvffomllm W WL 69AUTO FAM O PWAN +' FENCE TEN OI'I Z Court � 5�082 � #I c RACNY #I C 4PPN # C LLA # C #1 C #15 C #� C #QC C LAWN REPAIR I SELF- CL051% GATE 14 EXIST, CONC, EXIST, EXIST. DRIVE PORCH VER5k---"N 4-1-2024 OPTION A � CONNECT POOL DECK TO PATIO BELOW THE DECK (ALREADY PART OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCIJLAfiIDN) fi0 MAKE A CONfiIGUOIYo POOL DECK AREA AND PATIO, 780 SF RESIDENCE DESIGNED BYt DAVE SONKA MNLA GP - 661-23q-6360 t1cB T FOR CONSTRUCTION - FOR ESTIMATION REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY, UNTIL. PERMIT UED FOR POOL AND ALL LANDSCAPE FEATURES PERMITTED AS RE6J2ED BY TIE 14RED 1.1VI1J ALLATION CONTRACTORS, SPT i DWN 12" CB bEP°I,, RUBY STELLA ROCK AND FABRIC , I SPIREA, GLOW GIRL FOR PERMEABILITY •220 ao ��REfiE AREFAA a 19 Wf W fiW"PE OP fill g •.I A i i ' • � 9FADgh ANP 5TARP AREA 1 2—" I" v v v+ v+ . v 7 �R + 7 R VIER ADECIN ROCK .•- I Y .1� •=t J. t qAA&LL UP ER 5 M I SPIREA, GLOW WFZ� I VIC � ie � T THIS AREA WILL BE A LEVEL 17LAY AkEA FOJAIRLY FAMIL Y_° AND PETS THE / ON ITE. ST 5F X W DEEP W TI-1 3/4 CIEAR DRANAGE R >K SURFACE-. DRAWAGE - _ .PATTERN s A'PWMATED TURF GRASS `. DRAM TILES, WTN LBACW FIELD APON A Low I PIR ,, GLdW GIRL ' a �• PERMEABLE"3/4"- TRAP ' A 8-4"ATR P ROCK WITH FILTER FABRIC ROCK !BELQW DECK STAIR•5 , , , , a J a a a a • g g A • a a • , g J • d a POOL A ° a a , g a 14 / ` 30I e a ag 840SF •� a a g d , g a • $ a g A a S 8 a R • s a a a AUT0=C0VEI, LID y A A A A A A A I i i LAWN REPAID I t I 1 I I I I I I I LANK REPAIR r uvw It �ACLT- OCRAT = = 4"CG NLTRig1 "OvIr l►,w1roa DRAIN FACE V _ L E TILE FMW „i MWAN am °''1M6C "xg — -DRAINA — — PATTERN THIS AREA NOT If DISTURBED 8/4" TRAP ROCK T1415 AREA NOT DISTURBED ROCK LOT AREA HOUSE, DRIVE PORCH, WALK DECK 2qC PATIO (WI ADDED? 2,81 CON PL POOL, POOL DECK, CONCRE DECK TO BE 9 ADDED TOTAL 840 SF 14" TRAP ROCK GATE I NINEBARK, DIRE /4 PL 5 UNIPERt WICHITA E 7 GR• CALAMAGROS 4" CG DRAIN TILE FENCE . p h 3/4" TRAP ROCK r;. PL 9 �p� UPDATED LANDSCAPE IDESIGh NOTES ON THE PROJI ICT, VERSION 4=1=2024 DAVID SONKA, MNLA CP (a51-23q—(04(oO 11 1 tems�fi wr The Birthplace of Minnesota May 10, 2024 Ground FX Lawn & Landscape, Inc. 2320 Leibel St. Suite 106 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Re: 3085 Lowell Ct. Variance Request Dear Ryan Zwonitzer, City Staff reviewed the Variance request application for the above property pertaining to a proposed 14'x16' in ground swimming pool. The proposed Variance request is to allow 49.6% of structural impervious where 25% structural impervious surface is required. The initial application for a 16'x32' square foot pool at this property was denied by the City on February 21, 2024 noting that the property was already over on it's allowed impervious surface. Upon initial contact with you, the applicant, Staff noted that a variance request of this nature would have a low likelihood of approval. This is specifically due to the request not meeting the Practical Difficulty requirements. Staff noted this same concern in multiple conversations over the course of this project application, at various stages of review. A variance application to exceed the permissible impervious surface by 24.6% was submitted April 22, 2024. While the request shows an effort on the applicant's part to reduce the impact of the proposed increase, upon review of the variance application, staff found that the request did not met the "practical difficulty" test required to grant a variance. Staff would like to note that the property owners are well within their right to request a variance. Based on the application materials submitted, Staff will be recommending denial of the variance to exceed the impervious surface requirements. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions. ioK�- Katriona Molasky City of Stillwater Assistant City Planner 216 4th Street North, Stillwater Minnesota — 651-430-8800 — www.stillwatermn.gov From: Lauren Thayer <Imthayer@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2024 5:32 PM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Case no. CD 2024-020 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Afternoon, I just received a notice in the mail about case no. CD 2024-020 relating to a pool being put in at 3085 Lowell Ct. I fully support their desire to put in a pool. I feel like this would be a great addition as our neighborhood is very kid centered. The Opitz family are also really responsible people and would properly take care of the pool and surrounding areas. After speaking with them they have done alot of research and have a water mitigation plan for their landscaping. This will exceed impervious surface requirements and I am very confident they will take the steps every year to ensure this is well maintained. If you have any questions please feel free to reach out! Thank you, Lauren Cardinal From: Tom & Katie Klug <klugerson@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 4:43 PM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Variance Request: Case No. CD 2024-020 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, We are writing regarding the variance request for 3085 Lowell Court (Opitz), Case No. CD 2024-020. Our family lives at 3077 Lowell Court, which is the adjacent property to the east of the Optiz family. We wholly support and ask that the Planning Commission approve their request. Numerous other homes in our development have successfully undertaken similar projects that exceed impervious surface standards, with some of those projects requiring a higher percentage of coverage than what is being requested here. Furthermore, we've seen the proposed project plans and believe that it would be beneficial to the overall character and appearance of the neighborhood. As one of the residences that immediately surrounds the area where the proposed project would occur, we ask that you take our support into consideration. Thank you, Tom & Katie Klug (651) 955-6116 1 (651) 260-1138 From: Jonathan Moehnke <jonathan.moehnke@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10:04 AM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: The Opitz Family - Case No. CD 2024-020 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, Stillwater Planning. My name is Jon Moehnke and my family of five and I enjoy our wonderful community at 3080 Lowell Ct. I am writing to you today to offer my utmost support for my neighbor's (The Opitz Family's) current request for a Variance to construct a pool in their backyard. Having gotten to know Tom and Kristen quite well over recent years, I can say they are the epitome of considerate and upstanding community members. Because of this, it was no shock to me after hearing their plans and the subsequent need for a water mitigation plan and infiltration system to be added, Tom and Kristen took the matter seriously and with the utmost respect. As a proud naturalist, I have full faith in The Opitz's ability to maintain the health and wellbeing of our neighborhood's surrounding natural area; but as a father, I much, much appreciate their desire and generosity to provide such a wonderful benefit to the dozens of children within our neighborhood. It will be a real value to the kids and the whole neighborhood during those long hot summer months when nearby clean water activities are in such short supply. Thank you for considering their request. Sincerely, Jon Moehnke From: Kendra Lohmer <klohmer@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10:43 PM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Written Comment re: Case #CD 2024-020 [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, We are writing in as a neighbor of Tom and Kristen Opitz - Case # CD 2024-020). We are aware that they have been thoughtfully planning this for over a year now. They have given time to think through the details and taken partners in how to best execute it. They have shared with us the plan to strategically place the pool to adhere to the variance requirements, and have thorough plans for a water mitigation system. We know that if there are other things that they need to consider or adjust, that they would be open and willing to understand and do what is necessary. Additionally, we know from other work we have done, that the Millbrook neighborhood also has built in space to accommodate these requirements, which must have been taken into consideration with other neighborhood pool decisions. We have known Tom and Kristen for over 6 years now, and we feel very lucky to be their neighbors. They have only improved their house and lot since moving in, and are clearly still invested in making this neighborhood a place to raise our children. It is decisions like these that keep families living in the city of Stillwater and not seeking "more land" outside of the city limits. We ask for your careful consideration and approval of this case. Thank you, Chris and Kendra Lohmer 651-208-9686 From: Cindi Rutten <cinrutten@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 10:14 AM To: Planning Dept <planningdept@stillwatermn.gov> Subject: Case No. 2024-020, 3085 Lowell Ct [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern: We received the letter regarding Case No 2024-020. Our house at 3120 Lowell Ct shares a small corner of property with 3085 Lowell Ct (think kitty corner). We appreciate the notice regarding the possibility of a pool at the 3085 residence. At this time, we see no issue for our property or theirs in regard to water mitigation. Mr and Mrs Optiz may be the most considerate and respectful neighbors in the Lowell Ct loop and we believe they would do any due diligence to have a professional landscaping plan to enhance the pool area and water mitigation because of the pool. Please reach out if you have any questions. Best, Cindi Rutten 608-443-8033