The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-07-20 HPC Packetiliwater .HE BIATHOLACE of M,N.Eso.n PLEASE NOTE: Heritage Preservation Commission meetings are streamed live on the city website and available to view on Channel 16. Public can participate by attending the meeting in person at City Hall, 216 4th St N, or by logging into https://stillwater-mn.zoomgov.com/j/1600977928 or by calling 1-646-828-7666 and enter the meeting ID number: 160 097 7928 AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING July 20t", 2022 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of June 15t", 2022 regular meeting IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 2. Case No. 2022-52. Consider Design Permit for Rooftop improvement at 227 Main St S; Case of 227 Main St S Properties, LLC 3. Request for a Concurrence for Retaining Wall Removal in Downtown Parking District Lots #14 & #15 VI. PUBLIC HEARING VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VIII. NEW BUSINESS 4. Case No. 2022-50. Consider Design Permit for Masonry Repair at 101 Water St S; Case of Water Street Inn IX. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS 5. Case No. 2020-27. Receive Update on Design Permit Amendment for rooftop improvements. Property located at 223 Main St S; Case of White Bear Ventures. - Tabled in part from the May Meeting. Postponed at request of Owner at June Meeting. 6. Case No. 2022-08. Receive Update on Design Permit for 126 Main St S for Store Front Painting; Case of Blue Sun Soda Shop. Commission Request for Update from June Meeting. 7. Discuss moving Regular Meetings to Second Wednesday of the month. X. FYI XI. ADJOURNMENT i I I \ i's'Ater THE OIRTIIPLACE OF NINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING June 15, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Thueson, Commissioners Finwall, Heimdahl, Holmes, Mino, Summers, Councilmember Junker Absent: Commissioner Larson Staff: Community Development Director Gladhill APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of May 18, 2022 Regular Meeting Commissioner Mino asked to add "She said" before "It's extremely unfortunate" on page 6. Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to approve the minutes of the May 18, 2022 meeting as amended. All in favor. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2022-42. Request for Design Permit for Window Replacement at 125 Main St S; Case of Nordik LUV, LLC Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Summers, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no public hearings. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Case No. 2020-27. Consideration Design Permit Amendment for rooftop improvements. Property located at 223 Main St S; Case of White Bear Ventures. Tabled in part from the May Meeting Mr. Gladhill stated this case was removed from the agenda at the applicant's request. Case No. 2020-32. Request for Design Permit Amendment for 200 Chestnut Apartments for Union Alley Wall; Case of Reuter Walton. - Tabled from the May Meeting Mr. Gladhill informed the Commission that after redesigning the retaining wall to a combination of 2- 4' retaining wall with fencing and landscaping, per the HPC's request during design review, the property owner had to modify the design plan again to accommodate underground parking. This necessitated raising the basement elevation which increased the height of the terrace and the wall along Union Alley. Additionally, the terrace area was repurposed to accommodate stormwater drainage on site through a green roof system. The plans now show a 4'6" wall with horizontal railing above. The wall will be stamped in a vertical, woodgrain pattern. The HPC reviewed this proposal at its April 20, 2022 meeting and suggested further design revisions including consideration of brick and Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 15, 2022 brick alternatives, as well as incorporation of public art as part of the proposed Union Art Alley project. Staff requests final direction on the wall design. Joel Hauck, ESG Architects, explained that they prefer a concrete wall over thin -set brick, for better durability and aesthetic. The wall will have a wood grain texture, with a smooth "picture frame" recessed area for artwork and a 42" tall (guardrail height), very thin -profile railing that allows visibility into the area to address safety concerns and code. The amount of soil in the garden has been reduced, allowing them to bring the wall down intermittently by 4", creating a bit of up and down. They also added brick facade to the middle of the building with this design change. Ari Parritz, Reuter Walton Development, added that artwork in the indentations will add color and the greenery will add dynamism. Commissioner Holmes asked about survivability of the plantings. Mr. Hauck replied there will be a landscape edge to protect the plants as much as possible. The garden area above is part of the stormwater management strategy, required by the City to be regularly maintained. Bob Loken, ESG Architects, added that the elevated edge around the plantings will help keep salt from getting into the soil. Commissioner Summers voiced concern that snow removal equipment could damage the edge of the planters. Mr. Hauck replied that they could run the edge all the way so it does not go in and out around the planting beds to make it easier to maintain the sidewalk. Commissioner Holmes suggested a grid that the vines could climb, which would provide more visual interest in winter. Commissioner Finwall asked if the concrete could be dyed. She said she likes the idea of adding river rock and a green screen to add interest. Mr. Hauck replied they can add color to the concrete or paint it, depending on the final aesthetic. Commissioner Mino asked how will the art rotation be managed? Mr. Parritz said art could be painted directly onto the concrete and then painted over when changed. There are many ways to handle it. Chair Thueson suggested making the art recesses larger. Motion by Commissioner Finwall, seconded by Commissioner Heimdahl, to approve Case No. 2020-32, Design Permit Amendment for 200 Chestnut Apartments for Union Alley Wall, adding Condition *1 stating that the applicant shall extend the edging along the sidewalk with river rock in line with the planting boxes; Condition #2 that the applicant shall add a vine grid; Condition #3 that the applicant shall add a slight tint to the concrete; Condition #4, that the mural spaces be enlarged; and Condition #5 that murals must comply with the mural guidelines in City Code. Commissioner Mino asked for the applicant's comments on tinted concrete. Mr. Loken said color tends to fade over time and can be cumbersome to apply. The preference is for all standard gray concrete. Commissioner Holmes proposed an amendment to the motion removing Condition #3. Commissioners Finwall and Heimdahl agreed with the friendly amendment. Commissioner Holmes asked if the motion can be specific about the size of the art murals. Page 2 of 5 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 15, 2022 Mr. Hauck said 30x48" would be a good proportion. Commissioner Finwall and Heimdahl agreed to the friendly amendment to Condition #4 to increase the mural spaces to 30"x48". All in favor of the motion with the four Conditions as amended during the discussion. NEW BUSINESS Case No. 2022-30. Request for Variance for Building Addition at 1204 4th Ave S.; Case of Michael & Nicole Willenbring Mr. Gladhill explained the case. The Planning Commission tabled action on this request for Variance and referred to the HPC for recommendation. City Code does not require the HPC review Variances in the Neighborhood Conservation District but the Planning Commission found that it was important to seek an HPC recommendation before acting on the request. The owners are requesting a Variance to the Side Yard (Exterior) Setback in order to construct an addition. The lower level of the addition would include an attached garage. The upper level of the addition would be additional living space. The project would also include demolition of an existing deck and detached garage. The required side yard (exterior) setback for this improvement is 20 feet; an 8 foot, 10 3/4 inch setback is proposed. Staff recommends approval. Nicole Willenbring, applicant, said they want to expand the home for their growing family. Katie Kangas, Pasque Architecture, LLC representing the applicants, spoke to the Willenbrings' passion for the historic home. The existing porch will not be touched. Design features of the original home will be carried forward in the addition, though details will be slightly different to indicate that it is not original. The setback of the addition will align with the modification that received a Variance in 2015. Four-sided design is being used. Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to recommend that the Planning Commission approve Case No. 2022-30, Variance for building addition at 1204 4th Ave S. All in favor. Case No. 2022-40. Request for Design Permit for Storefront Painting at 120 Main St S.; Case of Scandinavian North Mr. Gladhill explained the application for a Design Permit to change paint color on the wood accents to white, to better match their brand colors. They also want an additional sign which would be under staff review and authority. Staff suggested introducing at least one additional color to be consistent with other buildings, and is seeking direction from the HPC. Martin Hallkvist, applicant, explained that the business has been in town for 7 years and last year, moved into its own storefront on Main Street. They want to make the storefront colors mimic the inside - very bright white, simple, open and uncluttered. The shade of white has not been chosen. The panels above the windows are not symmetrical, they are off center, which pre-empts placement of a sign there. The panels will create some shadows which may give the effect of a second color. He gave examples of other buildings that use white. There will be black trim around everything to frame the white, similar to the architects' office on Chestnut Street. Commissioner Mino suggested the shade of white be muted since the design guidelines recommend muted colors. Commissioner Holmes noted that each of the three side by side tenant spaces have raised panels that vary in size, which were likely installed to replace former windows. He supports making them less prominent by painting them a single color, perhaps with a slightly darker or slightly lighter white in some areas so it doesn't look like it was only primed. Page 3 of 5 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 15, 2022 Commissioner Summers said the historically accurate whites would have been shades of gray. Perhaps the applicant can use a white shade that was available at that time the building was constructed. Commissioner Holmes suggested using a shade that is compatible with the shade of the stone. Chair Thueson commented that the middle part of the building will stand out as different from the two areas on either side of it. Commissioner Holmes suggested that the middle entrance be painted white with a black door as well. Mr. Gladhill stated this applicant does not control that space - it's an entrance to the upper level office of the building owner. Mr. Hallkvist said the building owner, Mike Lynskey, would probably approve painting of the area above his sign white. He offered to suggest this to Mr. Lynskey. Councilmember Junker recalled there was a lot of discussion of the building just to the south of this location. Main Street would change dramatically if every store owner used their logo colors instead of staying consistent. He feels a muted white will be an improvement. Commissioner Heimdahl said he is concerned that solid bright white and black metal frames on the door will really stick out on Main Street. He suggested incorporating some reds, blues or yellows reflecting the Swedish theme. He recalled that a condition of the previous project (soda shop) was that there would be differentiation between the panels and not just a solid color. Mr. Hallkvist agreed that red and white are traditional Scandinavian colors, but his store reflects modern Scandinavia. Adding another color (white) may make the block very colorful but comparing the four storefronts, his fits the best with the building period. Commissioner Finwall and Chair Thueson asked staff to research the approval for the nearby soda shop facade. Mr. Gladhill suggested staff spend time refining this proposal with the business owner based on the Commission comments, and bring the application back to the next meeting. Motion by Commissioner Summers, seconded by Commissioner Holmes, to table Case No. 2022-40, Design Permit for Storefront Painting at 120 Main St S., directing the applicant to bring back a more detailed proposal including color samples. All in favor. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS Concept Plan 9xx 1st St N.. pre -application feedback for proposed single-family dwelling Mr. Gladhill provided information on the proposed design of the home for informal HPC review, as requested by the applicants who may purchase the property. A modern home is being considered with a ground level garage and upper level on top of the steep slope. A steep slope variance or a setback variance will be needed due to the topography. The applicant is unable to be here tonight. Councilmember Junker pointed out there are many different housing styles in this block. He asked where utilities would come in for this lot. Mr. Gladhill replied the applicant would have to drill a private well through some limestone. Sanitary sewer is available. This has been reviewed with the Public Works Director. Chair Thueson asked if there is discussion of a height variance. Mr. Gladhill replied there is potential for a height issue but probably not. Either a variance to put it on the front property line, or a variance to put it in the steep slope will be required. Page 4 of 5 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting June 15, 2022 Chair Thueson noted the HPC supports modern style as long as it has four sided design and meets other guidelines. Historically, this block had 2-3 houses that were right on the line of First Street. He feels a front setback variance would be reasonable and there is some historic precedent for it. Commissioner Summers said he believes the original steep slope provisions were designed more to protect the area around the St. Croix River than individual slopes throughout the City. He is open to development only if they can use that slope in a different way. Commissioner Finwall commended the applicants on designing the house to fit the lot. She asked that they consider bird safety if large windows are used. She would support the front yard setback rather than building toward the bluff. FYI Commissioner Heimdahl said he and Commissioner Finwall have been working on proposed draft guidance for murals which is almost ready to send out for review by Commissioners and staff. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Finwall, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:14 p.m. Matt Thueson, Chair ATTEST: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director Page 5 of 5 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Design Permit for Rooftop Improvements at 227 Main St S BACKGROUND The Applicant is requesting a Design Permit to replace and enlarge the rooftop deck (and guard rails). The Building is located in the following Overlay Districts: 1. Historic Downtown Stillwater Commercial District (National Registry of Historic Places) a. Contributing Building b. The Building itself is not individually listed on the NRHP 2. Downtown Design Review District (Stillwater City Code) This building is the current location for Stillwater Proper and 45th Parallel Distillery. The second floor is a separate office space. The rooftop improvements appear to be unrelated to Stillwater Proper/45th Parallel Distillery. REQUEST The Applicant is requesting to replace a previous rooftop deck. The proposed deck would be larger in terms of square footage. However, most of the improvements will be screened by the existing parapet wall. ANALYSIS Located in the Downtown Design Review District, the City code requires: • Proposed alterations to a heritage preservation site shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation. • Proposed alterations shall conform to special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. ALTERNATIVES HPC has alternatives related to this request. A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District standards, and the standards set forth for Design Permits, the HPC should move to approve the request. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and are on file unless modified by the conditions herein. 2. HPC Design Permit approval does not constitute building permit approval. A building permit shall be obtained prior to work commencement. 3. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director or his/her designee. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the findings set forth for the granting of a Design Permit, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to decide, the request may be tabled to the following hearing. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Generally speaking, the granting of this Design Permit will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and does not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and its surroundings. Only a small portion will be visible (cable barrier). Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request with the conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. -o o - FIre-AJt%EI.) n F LATP-c7t2-M LA�nC�, pt.IT") "7-r to. r:S - G=1 rJ IS N SE LEcTEc DWnlEl2- I'"Zi+ PIKE FAIL c,r2- E0. , -MT 0 'To c V Ett t2 ^M C) of n LA',,..l r).(V , A ht') Et 14776. 2r4n 1=L9- , ..(1 L t/ itc II—ort +t HIGH (vJA. -i- - lw t_, I'�EG IL tL � l l- v. 0 IL,"o.c. - I-7rvs/ hl , 6EAM tnl 3 - Tor CLJSN W I �-� PLATE ON1 -To C' o r •67L , 2Tome STL To(' 1-2-r.I L. At-1,D EW-T ' j -- II -- (2�r1D4 5.4, GAC e t\-sLe\%, I/ L.� ss = 1 I- r vfr r 2-AIL_ 74-0 _!5EcJ1'-E vv -r *11 (4r)LotO r .zot—or'o,o, i Tc fir -v o, c, 2`I�ti T��E STl, Tot Hertz-Z L, Ic- verrr S,,erbet CDCar' 0,4, > » _I I `(2i• ll 4t ~- // Pr) r)IT,o1-Ir.L Pf 2PAC'E-r 51J1, of C'A-P.r'ET .WALL %a>;t SJ►z+At MENEM '2 - iJrbE STL, Tbr FLAIL IATr) , 'Co C--f 14.7fl, t/.lS'14C9 , (76rarAc'ET ��15T f'�.Izr.C'T architecture . product design residential - commerciol au homes J. Sweitzer Architects Ilc www Isweilzerorchilects.com jeffMjsweltzerarchitec ts.com 612.220.3283 SHEET INDEX / br, IT10 1,4 Proiect Team architect jettery swoitzer AIA CID 612-220-3283 engineer c tt salon Certification Hereby certify that this pin, epedhdlbn or report wee prepared by ma or tender my direct supervision and that I am a day icemen architect or engineer under the awe of the Stets of Minnesota_ na JE.PFE3-Y fZ,5v,er('aR- Legal Notice' These documents shall not be reproduced noredistributed without the expressed written consent of J.3wellzer-Architects I.LG Copyright 2020 =. Neon LLC 227 So. Main St. Stillwater MN 55082 N 21111 K) O / 0„ w o / z K) KD ° ED BM1 W12X26 DR _ OP & BO 0 V = _A\GES 0 z OD 0 0 0 0 Z 0 'I z 7 0 0 / �0 ! °\ \ 03 o BM2 W12X45 DR _ OP & BO 0 V = _A\GES - o o - z 0 7- z 0 OD 22118,E \S DI -ACES O= V ASO\RY WA__S 0 0 0 7/ 0„ 0 7 z U, O O i' OW BM2 W12X45 DR _ OP & BO 0 V - _A\G S 0 o - z 7- 0 0 z ii 7- 0 ® o O 0 6 N x 0,1 0 0 -z 00 -14 7- ocn z 7- 0 O 0 ,, 7/ 0„ o 0 z 4, 4 ° 4 # # # # # : 44 +� 03 0 / 0„ DR _ OP & BO 0 V - _A\G S o BM2 W12X45 p 0 0 0 0 0 z z 7- 7- 0 0 0 0 0 0 z 7- 0 03 0 O0 O 0 o BM1 W12X26 DR OP & BO 0 A\G S o - O z 0 -<z 7- 0 8 2S0 SHEET SOB 0 o z 0 SCALE : DATE : 8/27/20 DRAWN : BA CHECKED : R00 OP D 227 S0 S WA R ✓\ RA S V R \C 2 \O \ B VD., A 2> 228 A 2200 B/ CO R C 0\, 5000 O� 2 /Cm 58 98 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 SNDISIADS 0 GO 0 \ I Iw X O 7 O (7 (7 D 0 0 2\ Co O 7 7 03 03 O O 03 A co \ \ 0 <I �0 0 < o ��X ZN X O CA J > X Z X N O I 7J < Z 7 C.N1 0 2 D 0 0 0 0 CO 0 co Co v � O 0 CSA 3/ 611 �0 0 O 0 CA 2 3 1 3/ /2" 0 0 X —IN 0 O CO I Z O -0 -0cn \ CP QI_I- � X DCpromp2A— CAX DX N- cX Zip U \ X O < CO� M J O I O3 \X X 7J - N 0 0 0 0 J / O 0 0 0 S OE SV -b/� El-8 8/ C 8 1/8" III co coo Co CO CO 0� 77 O 0 7 7 / 7I0 3/ III O O 0 \ 7 CO 0 m 0 21 z cn = 2, 2, O O JOB NO. : SCALE : 0 D 2, 00 DRAWN : BA N CHECKED : O O ROO 0P D 227 S0 S WA R V V -C7 V V A RA S R \G 9 2 \ C, B VD , 258 2 27 ABG CO \V A\o 0\, \Co SO00 X) 258 98 O 7 O REVISIONS \ 0 \ 0 \ ED 0 OT J CJAI w 0 0 0 0 D ti ti CO ti ti ti 03 ti ti ti CO 0 H CA o\1-44 00 IT1 m w z \cn D rm O O 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ti CO ti ti ti CO ti ti 00 ti ti O 0 O 0 x N °J 0 0 0 4- 00 ti 00 ti CO ti ti ti ti CO ti w ti ti 00 \ ti 03 00 0 5 1/8" -u N 1 6 3/8" CUT O 03 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D ti ti 00 N 00 ti Co ti ti ND ti CO ti ti ti 2 60 O 00 0 w O 60 60 0 0 { 00 /3 3" C x LA O 0 0 0 00 o CI) z 0 00 ti 00 00 w ti cn = m —1 0 JOB NO. : SCALE : 0 > co DRAWN : BA W O N n o 0 = n o m 0 ROO OP D 227 Goo S WA R C7 ✓A ✓\ RA G R 3 C \C B VDo, 228 2 DO ABC CA C V A\ 0\, G000 3) 2 \C_ 78 98 CO CAI 0 0 0 REVISIONS CO w I' -0" CA 00 co Ion co CA CO co D 0 co N 00 D Ion co Oi 3 6" 3" CA CO co D 0 co w 0 ,6 I/O I ti CO co GNI( CO CA 03 co D 00 co 00 6" 0 co 00 PL4 0 03 CO U 0 OJ 0 0 0 CO CO -0 3 O O 0 O 6" 3" 02 O CU I BAH zX -17/ -1 CO O O w co 03 D 0 m GO D 0 z GO GO 0 co D 03 D 0 03 N O 03 D 0 0 0 0 O D 0 3 1/2" O 30 O 0 /\ 0 ti 0 0 O O O O O O OAL 5'8 A 0 03 CUT I0'-8" 0 Fri „•/ 7'x7ss� c,•/ 7x7'ss rn C0 -P X 00 X 0 8" n O 0 N 0 O D O O 0 O O O 3 0 O 0 w 0 D (f) O 0 O 0 03 CUT 9'-8 3/1" 0 0 0/ z W m CUT 9'-9 I/16" O co X co X_ N 0 ND O < 77 Cr) z DJ 1 co O O 00 9'-9 15/16" ti ff O O N 8" 0 co D CO 0 0 O On D 0 O O O n O O 0 0 0 0 CO O O 1 n D O O 01 JOB NO. SCALE : DATE : 9/3/2020 DRAWN : BA 01 0 CHECKED : ROO OP D 227 SO S WA R C< ✓A ✓\ RA S N R \C 3 2 \O B VD., 268 2 A 290 ABR CA CV A\o O\, SCOC O 2 \Co �8 98 2 CO REVISIONS CA N O N 0 GO 0J D --< L11wate. THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Concurrence for Retaining Wall Removal in Downtown Parking District Lots #14 & #15 BACKGROUND The City's Public Works Department is requesting to replace two retaining walls within the City's Downtown Parking District. The sites are located in the following Overlay Districts: 1. Downtown Design Review District (Stillwater City Code) As reference, neither site is located within the Historic Downtown Stillwater Commercial District (National Registry of Historic Places). ANALYSIS Staff consulted with Cultural Resources Staff at Bolton and Menk, the City's consulting planning firm that assists with a variety of planning and zoning related workload and specialty expertise needs. If the walls are not in the district, nor within the property lines of a designated historic property by the City of Stillwater, they do not required to be protected or rehabbed. Under State laws. Only those things within a NRHP listed property would be subject to review and protection by the SHPO and/or the same for city guidance's (only those in designated properties.). Lot 14 (Former Dry Cleaners Lot) A quick look at Google Maps and street view indicates the Lot 14 Wall is located behind a fairly new structure and within a parking lot. Looking at the Sanborn maps this block was occupied by a number of dwellings until 1922 when the fieldhouse would have removed have the block for construction. The rest is now a new building and a parking lot. Therefore, there is no historic structures to attached this wall to, it no longer has an ability to convey any historic significance. Lot 15 (Teddy Bear Park Lot) The Lot 15 Wall appears to be the same regarding the need to protect or rehab. However, it is constructed differently and has some historic qualities but has lost any significance since the original structures that it might have been associated with are now gone. It could have been a retaining wall for the Consumer Light and Power Co that was on this block as late as 1910. Later Sanborn maps are not available online at the time of drafting of this report. The parking lot, and introduction of other new properties has made this wall out of historic context and no longer can it portray its significance or integrity. It is Staff's opinion they both could be removed and replaced with something more stable. No design permit is necessary for this work, but since this is a public project, Staff is taking the extra step to seek concurrence of the HPC. NEW DESIGN The Public Works Department is considering two design options to replace these two walls. Staff finds that either is acceptable. • Natural Stone (Cut) Retaining Wall (to match Teddy Bear Park) • Out Crop Stone ACTION Motion to concur with Staff's recommendation that the retaining walls may be removed and replaced with something more stable. Exhibit A — Existing Conditions Lot 14 — Former Dry Cleaner Lot Lot 15 — Teddy Bear Park Lot Exhibit B — Construction Limits Lot 14 — Former Dry Cleaner Lot Lot 15 — Teddy Bear Park Lot easure distance _,co on Me mao toadd Nyour,. Measure distance CI. on the Toot° 4.1W yo, oath Togl eistance. 4I6.04tt(1<2.27 m) Exhibit C — Design Options Natural Stone (Cut) Retaining Wall Out Crop Stone illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Design Permit for Masonry Repair at 101 Water Street S; Case of Water Street Inn BACKGROUND The building at 208 Main Street South needs parapet repairs as several bricks in the upper right-hand corner of the building have deteriorated, loosened and fallen. As part of a roof repair project, the applicant is requesting Design Permit approval for brick repair and flashing installation. The Building is located in the following Overlay Districts: 1. Historic Downtown Stillwater Commercial District (National Registry of Historic Places) a. Water Street Inn (Former Lumberman's Exchange) is a Contributing Building b. The Building itself is not individually listed on the NRHP 2. Downtown Design Review District (Stillwater City Code) REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit for removal and replacement of of brick along the south wall of the Water Street Inn. A majority of the work will be tuckpointing and repairing mortar rather than replacing brick with new brick. Of key concern is the brick layer at the top of the building at the parapet wall. The brick at the parapet wall is pulling away from the parapet with enough separation/void to allow vegetation to begin growing inside the void. Repairs at the Parapet Wall are the priority for repair. However, the project will also include other masonry repair and tuckpointing throughout the entire south wall. ANALYSIS Located in the Downtown Design Review District, the City code requires: • Proposed alterations to a heritage preservation site shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation. • Proposed alterations shall conform to special design guidelines for areas or districts of the city officially adopted by the city council. Applicable guidelines indicate: • Roof edges should be related in size and proportion to adjacent buildings • The characteristic architectural features should never be removed or altered unless it is absolutely necessary. • Building alterations should restore architectural details of cornices, lintels, brick arches, chimneys, and ironwork of the original building as appropriate and feasible. Additionally, City Code indicates the HPC shall make findings that the application meets each of the following criteria in order to approve a design permit: • The proposed building alteration or new construction, including its appurtenances, does not materially impair the architectural or historic integrity of the building and site, adjacent buildings and sites, or the neighborhood as a whole. • Granting the design permit will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and does not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and its surroundings. Removal of deteriorated brick is appropriate so long as the replacement brick matches the original. The Contractor is attempting to salvage brick wherever possible. Wherever possible, the applicant and the contracting firm should repair the wall and parapet with salvaged materials. The Building Owner has noted that any new brick necessary will be used from a stock of leftover brick from the recent building expansion, which has already proven to be complimentary in terms of color, texture and composition. Staff has been working with the Contractor over the past thirty (30) days to ensure that the mortar used in the project matches existing conditions in terms of color, texture and composition. Staff denied the first two (2) mortar samples. The Contractor recently completed a third sample that appears to meet the City's requirements. ALTERNATIVES HPC has alternatives related to this request. A. Approve. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District standards, and the standards set forth for Design Permits, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2021-35. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: 1 Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and are on file with Case No. 2022-51 unless modified by the conditions herein. 2. The project shall salvage and reuse brick wherever possible. 3. Where new brick is required, it shall be integrated with the salvaged brick in a way that the new brick is interspersed with the old. 4. Mortar shall match existing mortar in terms of color, texture and composition. 5. HPC Design Permit approval does not constitute building permit approval. A building permit shall be obtained prior to work commencement. 6. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the Community Development Director or his/her designee. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the findings set forth for the granting of a Design Permit, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to decide, the request may be tabled to the following hearing. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Generally speaking, the granting of this Design Permit will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and does not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and its surroundings. If reuse of the existing materials occurs to the greatest extent possible, the replacement of deteriorated materials with a newer material in a similar size, color, shape and pattern does not materially impair the architectural or historic integrity of the building and site, adjacent buildings and sites, or the neighborhood as a whole. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Case No. 2022- 51 with the conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Exhibit A — Existing Conditions (Emergency Repair Request) w-"s'- iR Exhibit B — Approved Mortar Match Attempt #1 Attempt #2 Exhibit C — Previously Rejected Mortar Matches on W.` —MME--IM- 4 1=11•=111=I—F •....�!l..r_A�.� .Ors. ,. �. r�.rr•r a.. r.� —■ nrurr rr•r��n�r aim ■ minafl �r�nr�r a �r ► . !!r•1_IMlmMilMEN�_ Airr�rr�i a r!� r!!!!Z! r !!lrr�rrrlr��r� ��rrrl r� ! I11war THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Design Permit #2020-27 REVISION Request for Rooftop Improvements at 223 Main St S; Case of White Bear Ventures, LLC SPECIFIC REQUEST The intent of this case is to provide an update on approved construction activities on the rooftop for 223 Main St S as well as update the HPC on enforcement actions for construction activities completed but not approved. In summary, the Applicant is requesting the following amendments to the approved Design Permit. • Replacing previous storage shed with private enclosed wet bar with sink and television (partially complete) • **New since June HPC Meeting** - Glass fence on parapet wall for rooftop deck o Deck was raised without approval by the City, resulting in need for taller safety barrier than previous deck The Applicant is requesting formal consideration at the August Meeting. However, Staff felt it important to update the HPC since this project involved unapproved improvements and previous request to postpone review. Staff has issued a Compliance Letter/Notice of Violation that starts an official enforcement process. The Applicant has been notified that future violations of the approved Design Permit will result in Administrative Citations (starts at $200/occurrence, doubling with each infraction up to $2,000/occurrence). The City previously approved the elevator tower and its exterior materials (dark, muted standing seam metal). The Notice of Violation clarifies that any work on the rooftop moving forward is not authorized until the HPC considers the request for revision to the Design Permit. Any unauthorized work will be subject to Administrative Fines. If the HPC does not approve the requested revisions, these improvements will need to be removed. Exhibit A — Existing Conditions Photos - /-------_\__ � - 'r- ` Exhibit B — Previous Conditions Aerial I11war THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Receive Update on Design Permit Approval for Storefront Painting; Case of Blue Sun Soda Shop (Commission Request for Update) BACKGROUND At the June 15, 2022 HPC Meeting, the HPC requested a review of the Design Permit Approval compared to actual completion of storefront painting for Blue Sun Soda Shop at 124/126 Main St S. Attached to this report are the original case materials. Below is an image of actual construction completion. iliwater THE HIRTHPLACE OF .,NHESOTP Permit Fee: $50.00 Paid: 2/11/2022 CITY OF STILLWATER Community Development Permit Case No.: 2022-8 This permit is granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance and is not a substitute for a building, fence or sign permit. Please contact the Community Development Department at (651) 430-8820 to discuss additional permitting requirements for the project associated with this permit. Permit Type(s): Design Permit Final Action Date: 2/16/2022 By: Heritage Preservation Commission Action/Vote: Approved,6-0 Applicant(s) Mark Lazarchic, Applicant Michael Lynskey Sr., Owner Project Address(es) 126 (124) Main St S, Stillwater, MN 55082 Property ID(s).: 2803020410005 Approved Project Description: Approval of a Design Permit to repaint the wooden storefront elements Whip Lash red, Upbeat Yellow, and Peaceful River blue. Conditions of Approval: 1 Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and on file with HPC Case No. 2022-08. 2 All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 3 The dominate blue color shall be darkened with black or gray. Prior to paintinc the color sample shall be submitted to staff for review and approval. According to City Code Section 31-204, Subd. 6, unles sthe action permitted has been completed, this permit will expire and become void 24 months after the date it is approved. Page 1 of 2 Permit Fee: $50.00 Paid: 2/11/2022 CITY OF STILLWATER Community Development Permit Case No.: 2022-8 This permit is granted pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance and is not a substitute for a building, fence or sign permit. Please contact the Community Development Department at (651) 430-8820 to discuss additional permitting requirements for the project associated with this permit. We accept the conditions of this permit and will secure necessary City, State and Federal permits prior to project commencement. We further understand any changes from plans approved as part of this approved permit must be resubmitted for approval. Property Owner or Representative City Representative 2/17/2022 Date Date According to City Code Section 31-204, Subd. 6, unles sthe action permitted has been completed, this permit will expire and become void 24 months after the date it is approved. Page 2 of 2 iliwater THE B f FIT H P L A C E OF MINNESOIA PLANNING REPORT TO: Heritage Preservation Commission CASE NO.: 2022-08 MEETING DATE: February 16, 2022 APPLICANT: Mark Lazarchic, representing Blue Sun Soda & Sweet Shop LANDOWNER: M.J. Lynskey Sr., representing LDL Company REQUEST: Consideration of a Design Permit for facade painting LOCATION: 126 Main Street South (parent address: 124 Main Street South) DESIGNATION: N/A DISTRICT: Stillwater Commercial Historic District Downtown Design Review District REPORT BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST Blue Sun Soda & Sweet Shop has signed a three-year lease to operate at 126 Main Street South, a contributing building in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District. They would like to repaint the wooden storefront consistent with their company brand colors. SPECIFIC REQUEST Approval of a Design Permit to repaint the wooden storefront elements Whip Lash red, Upbeat Yellow, and Peaceful River blue. ANALYSIS The City's design guidelines for alterations in the Stillwater Commercial Historic District encourage retention and repair over replacement. The applicant's proposal intends to do just that. The city's adopted guidelines suggest building color should be compatible with historic materials, building type and Street view (Google — November, 2021) Case 2022-08 Page 2 of 3 style, and the surrounding area context. Little is known about the specific colors within the downtown area. In the past the Heritage Preservation Commission has encouraged dark, muted tones though that is not codified nor a part of the adopted guidelines. Peaceful River P500-5 Upbeat P300-5 Whip Lash P150-6 The building is flanked on both sides by storefronts where transom windows have been covered by, or replaced with, wood panels. Thus, this series of storefronts contain significantly more painting than many of the traditional storefronts along Main Street. The current condition does make these storefronts stand out a little more than other buildings within the vicinity. The building's existing color scheme contains two different shades of gray with maroon accents. The applicant is proposing muted variations of its business brand colors. The proposed design will change the darker gray areas to blue, lighter gray areas to yellow, and maroon to red. While this will have an impact to the streetscape, it will have no greater or less of an impact than the current color scheme. ALTERNATIVES A. Approve, whole or in part. If the proposed application meets the Downtown Design Review District standards, and the standards set forth for Design Permits, the HPC should move to approve Case No. 2021-36. Staff recommends the following conditions for approval: 1. Plans shall be consistent with those submitted to the Community Development Department and on file with HPC Case No. 2022-08. 2. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. B. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the Downtown Design Review District standards, then the Commission may deny the request. With a denial, the basis of action is required to be given. Furthermore, a denial with prejudice would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a similar application for one year. Case 2022-08 Page 3 of 3 C. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to decide, the request may be tabled to the following hearing. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Generally speaking, the granting of this Design Permit will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and will not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and its surroundings (including the Stillwater Commercial Historic District). Therefore, staff recommends approval of Case No. 2022-08 with the conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Narrative Request cc Mark Lazarchic M.J. Lynskey Sr. Soda, 6Sweets. Shop Regarding 126 S Main Street. Blue Sun Soda Shop has signed a 3 year lease to set up their 4th shop in Stillwater at the above address. In doing so we would like to make two changes on the outside of the building. 1- Is to add a sign. I have included the rendering of the sign and pictures showing how it will hang and look. There is also a full description of the materials attached. We believe it fits into the look in Downtown Stillwater. 2- We would like to repaint the wooden facade on the front of the building to match the company brand. I have attached a muted version of our colors to better show this. We would repaint the green sections blue. The beige section yellow. And the maroon section red. We believe these muted colors would look appropriate for the setting while allowing us to still maintain our brand image. Please let me know if you have any questions at all. Mark Lazarchic CEO Blue Sun Soda Shop Mark@bluesunsodashop.com 612-840-3240 i I I \ i's'Ater THE OIRTIIPLACE OF NINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING February 16, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairwoman Mino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairwoman Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Heimdahl, Larson, Thueson, Walls, Councilmember Junker Absent: Commissioner Holmes Staff: City Planner Wittman OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of January 19, 2022 Regular Meeting Motion by Commissioner Finwall, seconded by Commissioner Walls, to approve the minutes of the January 19, 2022 meeting. All in favor. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2022-08: Consideration of a Design Permit for facade painting. Property located at 126 (124) Main St S in Stillwater Commercial Historic District. Mark Lazarchic, applicant and LDL Company, property owners. Motion by Commissioner Thueson to adopt the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Larson asked that the item be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Commissioner Thueson withdrew the motion. City Planner Wittman explained that Blue Sun Soda & Sweet Shop is requesting approval of a Design Permit to repaint the wooden storefront elements in Whip Lash Red, Upbeat Yellow, and Peaceful River Blue colors. Staff recommends approval with two conditions. Commissioner Larson noted the absence of a rendering from the applicant showing how the new colors will look when done. He generated an image for discussion. He understands that colors are not part of the design guidelines but would appreciate discussion of whether the proposed colors fit the historic character of downtown. He appreciates the applicant toning down the colors for a subdued version of their logo colors. Chairwoman Mino felt the prevalent blue color would stand out. Councilmember Junker noted this applicant and future applicants will want signage to match their logo colors. Commissioner Thueson wondered if the red and blue colors could be reversed. Amanda Stone, controller for Blue Sun Soda Shop, said they would be open to reversing the blue to the red as described by Commissioner Thueson, and hopeful it can be approved tonight. Commissioner Larson said the goal is to decrease the brightness of the blue and to have the dominant color be the least bright color. Commissioner Finwall said if red is dominant, it might clash with the red brick. Ms. Wittman agreed. Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting February 16, 2022 Chair Mino suggested toning down the blue and graying it somewhat. Ms. Stone said they can work with that suggestion. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Heimdahl, to approve Case No. 2022-08, Design Permit for facade painting at 126 (124) Main St S, with the two staff -recommended conditions, adding Condition #3 stating that the dominant blue color shall be darkened with black or gray. Prior to painting the color sample shall be submitted to staff for review and approval. All in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2022-09: Consideration of a Design permit for the design of a new single-family home to be constructed on the property located at 505 Elm St W in the Neighborhood Conservation district. Emily Blaser, of Oevering Homes, applicant. Michael Russ of Archangel Assets 4 LLC, property owner. City Planner Wittman explained that 505 Elm Street West was approved by the City to be split (re - subdivided) from 819 William Street North. The property is under contract with Oevering Homes to build a new single-family residence on the property. A request for a Design Permit for a new home on this property was denied in 2021 as that design did not conform to the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines for new construction. The applicant has requested Design Permit approval to build a 28' wide, 2.5 story, single-family home with a 22' wide attached garage. The home's footprint conforms to the zoning code's 25% maximum coverage. Staff recommends approval with eight conditions. Emily Blaser, Oevering Homes, said they would be okay with putting LP siding on all four sides per one of the staff -recommended conditions. Chair Mino opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. She closed the public hearing. Commissioner Finwall thanked the applicant for making the changes suggested by the Commission. The design is much improved and fits the vernacular of the neighborhood. Chair Mino said she would like to review the materials in more detail and discuss adding shakes on the back to correspond to the shakes on the front. Jeff, Overing Homes, explained the mix of materials. LP is used because it is stable, keeps its finish for a long time and is warrantied. They use LP on all their houses because of its longevity and look. Commissioner Larson remarked the gables in front should be treated the same as other gables in the back. The HPC prefers LP to vinyl as it looks more like wood. With the drop in grade, the side elevation appears almost three stories tall, but four-sided design and LP siding would help. Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Wall, to approve Case No. 2022-09, Design permit for the design of a new single-family home to be constructed at 505 Elm St W, with the eight conditions recommended by staff, adding Condition #9, following four sided design, the gables on the garage and front and back shall be treated in a consistent way; and addition Condition #10, consistent material on all four sides, being LP siding and trim, shall be required. Michael Russ, Archangel Assets 4 LLC, stated that Condition #4 talks about a variance which is not needed now, based on staff recalculation of total lot coverage. City Planner Wittman replied the proposal is in conformance with that requirement so it's fine. All in favor. NEW BUSINESS Page 2 of 4 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting February 16, 2022 Case No. 2022-07: Consideration of a Design Permit for courtyard renovations and exterior modifications. Property located at 102 2nd St S in the Downtown Design Review District. Jennifer Noden of 7 Edges Design LLC, applicant and Ross Larson of Nordic LUV LLC, property owner. City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting a Design Permit to: 1. Remove a rear - access door currently located approximately 3-4' above ground grade and replace with new, dark - colored metal storefront door and transom window; 2. Replace an existing, rear -facing window with a new, white -colored metal frame window; 3. Remove a wooden, second -story deck and stairway system and replace with a black metal and composite deck board walkway, stairs and overhang system; 4. Remove and replace existing Northern and Western railing with new, black metal fence; 5. Remove existing vegetation to construct a new, at -grade, concrete wall and thin -set limestone surrounded and landscape paver patio and walkway at the rear of the building; and 6. Add downward projecting wall sconces and landscaping lighting. Staff recommends approval with four conditions. Chair Mino asked if the windows on the upper level will be replaced as well. She also noticed there are a couple different colors of grout Jennifer Noden, 7 Edges Design LLC said this project involves just the lower level. They will try to match the original grout under the door. Commissioner Larson asked what will be between the arched lintel and the new dropped door. Ms. Noden replied they will fill the space up to the lintel with the window. Councilmember Junker and the Commissioners said the improvements will be unbelievably beautiful. Motion by Commissioner Thueson, seconded by Commissioner Walls, to approve Case No. 2022-07, Design Permit for courtyard renovations and exterior modifications at 102 Second St S, with the four staff -recommended conditions. All in favor. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS National Preservation Month and Annual Awards Program The consensus of the Commission was to acknowledge National Preservation Month in May but to award the Heritage Preservation Awards in the fall, as was done last year. City Planner Wittman will email the Commissioners some ideas for discussion at the March meeting. HPC "Committee" Work Ms. Wittman agreed to help facilitate meetings of the following HPC informal "committees": Neighborhood Conservation District Best Practices - Commissioners Larson and Holmes will be putting together a best practice guide for the Neighborhood Conservation District. Commissioners are invited to submit pictures of examples of infill housing. Community Group Presentation - Commissioner Thueson and City Planner Wittman have been invited to speak at the Stillwater Women's Reading Club in April. Mural Guidelines - Commissioner Heimdahl will start exploring possible guidelines, specifically addressing public art on structures and determining what are the best practices of doing that in a way that is respectful and doesn't harm or detract from the historic district. City Planner Wittman added she will talk with staff internally also. Noting that some cities require a comprehensive sign plan for a mural, Commissioner Finwall also asked to serve on this committee. Page 3 of 4 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting February 16, 2022 2022 Workplan - Local Designation Program - Ms. Wittman will set up a meeting with Commissioner Thueson and Chair Mino to look at past studies and explore the landmark site program. FYI Assistant City Planner Vacancy Ms. Wittman shared that the opening for Assistant City Planner has been posted. City Improvement Projects Ms. Wittman said the City submitted a request for the state bonding bill to include funding for riverfront park improvements, including Lumberjack Landing, Lowell Park Gazebo, Chestnut Plaza, Bridgeview Park, Bergstein shoddy mill and warehouse, and a transient dock at the south end of Bridgeview Park. Supporting Local Control for Zoning Ms. Wittman stated that the City Council recently adopted a Resolution supporting the protection of local decision -making as it relates to zoning, development fee and building permit fees. As it relates to the work of the HPC, past legislative bills have included language that would restrict the ability for cities to require certain exterior materials unless already required by State Building Code. This would have a significant effect on the Design Review Districts. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Walls, seconded by Commissioner Thueson, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. ATTEST: Abbi Wittman, City Planner Amy Mino, Chair Page 4 of 4 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: July 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and HPC Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider Moving Regular Meeting Dates to 2nd Wednesday of the Month BACKGROUND Based on recent Staff Vacancies and discussions on sufficient primary and backup Staff Support for Commissions, Staff would like to discuss the possibilities of moving the Regular HPC Meetings to the second Wednesday of each month rather than the third Wednesday of each month. The third week of the month requires significant Staff Resources for the following public meetings. Tuesday @ 7:00 p.m. (sometimes 4:30) City Council Wednesday @ 7:00 p.m. HPC Thursday @ 8:30 a.m. Downtown Parking Commission Said series of meetings the third week of the month makes it difficult to provide redundant and backup staffing. In addition to staffing said meetings themselves, the week prior involves preparation of Staff Reports and Agendas. Currently, there are no public meetings the second Wednesday of the month. Moving the HPC Meeting still provides the necessary schedule to review Applications prior to Planning Commission (for those projects that need both HPC and Planning Commission). Remote attendance options have added a layer of flexibility in scheduling Commission Meetings. This is an informal discussion only. If the HPC concurs, Staff will forward a more formal action at a future date.