Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-05-25 CPC Packeti11wai THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA PLEASE NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are streamed live on the city website and available to view on Channel 16. Public can participate by attending the meeting in person at City Hall in the Council Chambers, 216 4th St N, by logging into https://stillwater-mn.zoomgov.com/j/1608779021 or by calling 1-646-828-7666 and enter the meeting ID number: 160 877 9021 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 25', 2022 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. ELECTION OF OFFICERS IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Possible approval of minutes of April 27th, 2022 regular meeting minutes V. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. VI. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and act on the proposed item. 2. Case No. 2022-25: Consideration of a Variance to the Front Yard Setback for the construction of a front porch. Property located at 107 Laurel St E in the RB district. Eric Hansen of Fresh Start Builders, applicant and Ryan and Mary Collier, property owners. 3. Case No. 2022-26: Consideration of a Variance to the allowed impervious surface coverage in order to construct a deck. Property located at 3490 87th St N in the TR district. Paul and Luane Bruggers, property owners. 4. Case No. 2022-27: Consideration of a Variance to the allowed impervious surface coverage in order to construct a deck. Property located at 3610 Wright St in the RB district. Eric and Teresa Johnson, property owners. 5. Case No. 2022-28: Consideration of a Variance to the allowed impervious surface coverage in order to construct a detached garage. Property located at 7155 Melville Ct N in the LR district. Brandon and Dawn Kotval, property owners. 6. Case No. 2022-29: Consideration of a Variance to the Front Yard Setback to construct a car port. Property located a 226 Harriet St N in the RB district. Mary Katherine Jerome, property owner. — Request Withdrawn by Applicant 7. Case No. 2022-30: Consideration of a Variance to the side corner setback to construct an attached garage addition. Property located at 1204 4th Ave S in the RB district. Katie Kangas, applicant and Michael and Nicole Willenbring, property owners. 8. Case No. 2022-33: Consideration of a Variance to the allowed structural coverage in order to construct a deck. Property located at 3671 Summit Lane in the RB district. Noelle Singerhouse, property owner. IX. DISCUSSION 9. Receive Update from Sustainable Stillwater 10. Policy for Packet Add -On Materials 11. Annual Training Flyer X. FYI — STAFF UPDATES XI. ADJOURNMENT ilivater THE 1I11TNYLACE OF MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 27, 2022 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Chairman Dybvig called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Dybvig, Commissioners Hoffman, Knippenberg, Meyhoff, Steinwall, Councilmember Odebrecht Absent: Commissioner Hansen Staff: Community Development Director Gladhill APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of minutes of March 23, 2022 regular meeting Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Meyhoff, to approve the minutes of the March 23, 2022 meeting. All in favor. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA There were no items on the Consent Agenda. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2022-13: Consideration for a Preliminary and Final plat. Property located at 516 Myrtle Street West in the RB district. Michael Koch of PMI Homes. Inc., applicant and Steve and Lynn Thron, property owners. Community Development Director Gladhill explained that Steve and Lynn Thron are requesting a Preliminary Plat to split the property into two lots, one for the existing 6-unit dwelling and a new lot for a single-family home on the resulting southern parcel. Staff determined an error was made in the initial acceptance of the PMI/Thron application. The lot split cannot be processed as a resubdivision, as the subject property has never been platted. Thus, the applicant is going through a standard subdivision review process and, as part of that process, no variance would be required. This has no impact on existing structures. The applicant must show each property and its improvements conform to all RB base zoning district requirements. Staff finds the proposed preliminary plat to be consistent with the purpose of the Subdivision Ordinance and would recommend the Planning Commission recommend approval with five conditions. Mike, PMI Homes, stated the initial application was for a 5' setback variance due to the requested lot split. There has been neighbor opposition to the resulting address change. He offered to answer questions on the proposed new home. Planning Commission April 27, 2022 Chair Dybvig asked if there will be need for any additional variances. Mike said he intends to meet all existing City codes. Chair Dybvig opened the public hearing. Pat Kelly, 604 Myrtle Street, raised the issue of parking. He suggested that the lot line be repositioned to 71' from Myrtle Street to better sync the size of the lots with the size of the houses and eliminate the need to remove the gravel. Mr. Gladhill noted as part of the appeal to the variance setback, there were materials provided to the City Council which related to an appeal to last month's decision. Chair Dybvig closed the public hearing. Councilmember Odebrecht pointed out that some of the other lots associated with the old schoolhouse were subdivided off in the 1960s so this is not the first subdivision here. Motion by Commissioner Steinwall, seconded by Councilmember Odebrecht, to approve Case No. 2022-13, Preliminary plat for property located at 516 Myrtle Street West, with the five staff - recommended conditions. All in favor. Case No. 2022-19: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit and associated Variances for a large building project. Property located at 107 3rd Street North in the CBD district. Nathan Landucci of Browns Creek West LLC, property owner. - Tabled until the May meeting Case No. 2022-20: Consideration of associated Variances to construct a patio and pergola. Property located at 1225 Pine St W in the RA district. Darwin and Kim Dean, property owners. Mr. Gladhill reviewed the case. Darwin and Kim Dean are requesting Variances to construct a 24' x 23' pergola approximately flush with the property line and approximately 16' from Willard Street West. The property currently has a patio that extends all the way to the southern lot line. The pergola will provide shade for the patio. This is an after -the -fact variance for lot coverage, as the existing patio puts the lot coverage over the 30% maximum resulting in approximately 37% lot coverage. The construction of the patio was erroneously approved by City Staff sans lot coverage consideration. The following variances are requested: a 30' variance from the required front/corner yard setbacks of 30' to reduce the setback to 0'; and a variance to increase the maximum allowed lot coverage from 30% to 37%. Staff finds that, with reasonable conditions, the request conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance and recommends approval of the variances with three conditions. Commissioner Steinwall asked for clarification of recommended condition #3. Mr. Gladhill stated that provided the variance is granted, the applicants still must obtain watershed approval which might require them to install raingardens to handle runoff. Councilmember Odebrecht questioned how a pergola could be considered an impervious surface. Mr. Gladhill replied it is more about the patio surface which has already been approved erroneously by staff. Darwin and Kim Dean, applicants, stated the patio drains completely; water will not drain into the street. The pergola is to protect from the sun. They have developed landscaping plans which will also help handle drainage. The neighbors agree with the project. Chair Dybvig opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. Page 2 of 3 Planning Commission April 27, 2022 Motion by Commissioner Meyhoff, seconded by Commissioner Hoffman, to approve Case No. 2022-20, Variances to construct a patio and pergola at 1225 Pine St W with the three staff - recommended conditions. All in favor. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. DISCUSSION Election of Officers Discussion Mr. Gladhill reminded the Commission that new Chair and Vice Chair terms begin in May and there will be one new Commissioner in May. Commissioner Meyhoff expressed interest in being Vice Chair; Chair Dybvig would be interested in continuing as Chair. FYI STAFF UPDATES There were no staff updates. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Hoffman, seconded by Commissioner Meyhoff, to adjourn the meeting at 7:31 p.m. All in favor. ATTEST: Abbi Wittman, City Planner John Dybvig, Chair Page 3 of 3 Jenn Sundberg Subject: RE: Planning Commission From: Karen Kill Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 10:24 AM To: Larry Odebrecht Subject: FW: Planning Commission [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Larry, Thanks for the call today. Here are the comments I made last Friday to Tim. I will plan to be at the meeting Wednesday. Karen Tim, Lots of impervious increase variance requests within BCWD for this city planning commission meeting May 25tn Several caught my attention... Nottingham 3490 87th St N - was a BCWD permitted development that assumed a specific amount of impervious per lot and designed the stormwater management based on that impervious. I'm having our engineers take a look at the assumption that were made. May require additional stormwater management on the site to mitigate if city approves additional impervious...l'II let you know what I find out. Rutherford Station -3610 Wright St— very small amount of overage from city impervious but in a known flooding problem area immediately downstream...why not just hold them to the lot coverage when asking for a 12x20 or 12x24 deck when only 14 sq ft over? That's a big deck. Long Lake — 7155 Melville Court — report erroneously says this in in Middle St. Croix. It is in Brown's Creek Watershed District and would exceed 10,000 square feet of impervious. If city approves, they will be required to get a stormwater management permit from BCWD. 1 Rutherford Station — 3671 Summit Lane — again why not hold to the amount of impervious...this is a known flooding issues downstream. Erroneously states in Middle St. Croix WMO, but in BCWD. This development was permitted by BCWD for set amount of impervious for the stormwater management that was installed. I'm confused when I read the report and don't clearly understand the "other" impervious to know how much impervious do they have and what is proposed from this memo. Can you help clarify this one on the total existing impervious and what proposing to add so we can compare that to the original permit assumptions? I would have sent this to Frannie Nielsen too, but their contact information is not on the city website in the staff directory. Best Regards, Karen Karen Kill, Administrator Brown's Creek Watershed District 455 Hayward Ave N Oakdale, MN 55128 From: CITY OF STILLWATER [mailto:planningdept@ci.stillwater.mn.us] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2022 12:35 PM To: Karen Kill < > Subject: Planning Commission 2 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: May 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Variance Request in Downtown Design Review District; Variance to Front Yard Setback for Front Porch at 107 Laurel St E BACKGROUND The Owners of 107 Laurel St E are requesting a Variance to the Front Yard Setback in order to construct a front porch. The underlying zoning district is the RB: Two -Family Residential District. The site is located in the Downtown Design Review District. All Variances within the Downtown Design Review District shall be reviewed by the HPC prior to formal consideration by the Planning Commission. The site is also located in the Neighborhood Conservation District and is part of the City's Heirloom and Landmark Sites Program. The required front yard setback for this improvement is 20 feet. The Owner is proposing a 7 foot, 7 inch setback. The Stillwater Design Guidelines encourage front porches as an important design element and character element of older single-family areas of Stillwater. It is not uncommon to see historical patterns of front porches constructed up to the front property line in these neighborhoods. Additions of porches to increase the living areas of homes is well documented in the Stillwater Design Guidelines as part of the historic pattern and evolution of Stillwater. Porches provide a transition from the public street to the private space of the building. ANALYSIS State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The proposed addition to the existing home appears to be a reasonable use. Front porches are encouraged by the Stillwater Zoning Code and associated design guidelines. At one point in history, it appears that this structure had a covered front porch that was removed at a later date. The circumstances are unique to the property in that this generally historic neighborhood pre -dates current zoning regulations pertaining to front yard setbacks. The Owner is attempting to restore a previous condition. The Variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; in fact, the proposed improvement will arguably improve the character of the neighborhood through accepted neighborhood design elements. Finally, the difficulties are not economic considerations alone. The Owner has gone through great lengths to design a porch that meet applicable design guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request. All Variances within the Downtown Design Review District shall be reviewed by the HPC prior to formal consideration by the Planning Commission. The HPC has recommended approval of the request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Variance to Front Yard Setback for a Front Porch at 107 Laurel St E. illwa ter r _lot -", l'l 01-,.. '...' • i-• • ,. . • , ...4,,, . ••,, 14, , ' ',Jo,. . _ ,. • ,, 1,, , .. , : _ .,. iii iiii 4. I* . - i ____: _ .... _, 3••• The Birthplace of Minnesota \ 0-- __. ... , .,,,, .3.3‘"" - ',.S.,,..., ,, ''•'.3!'t -`. • ?• • '' •-,..- „.-4,-,. -.-- ...,.. '''..i_ic '.'"•-•:- . v-,•;,, .., .. . , Laurel St E 45 90 180 Feet ' • "WI; r•_ . (iPtort General Site Location 011°Al : • X I e\ , A 1/41n . . ... A, lia j i '4111hunifitwi;„. 1 - , • . 3,- ^ Iii- ----,r,‘ . :„,....,.....,.,... „, , 0 ::'?-‘11::,...,„..7..._: . - " , _ 6 • 3 ..33432,10 NEP :flii• .61 • 1.I-2:4,.I. ! \1 •4_A"- mil?MA1C,Il,34.,N.T1IIlmL---.1e13z.0.41.:-1&.,„ ' -f13 1111,11g. r a.E. . WW1 - • .. II ... --"- _•' -.__4" ' ' -: at • .. ' 4. r:-;..;iAIi.7V- Ii4 %- -A.;• '. -.,..'--• . .p.-'• , - 44.4. 444t41' :4 I .g c. •. I_••` . `. 0a...--p1,'r.... A:. _ . • 1, I I.-.i17...=,,,_ 'AEI= Nom _mIm ir--, 111 issir, it S104. .... r uw-Asommer- Variance Request Letter To: City Planner Abbi Wittman, Community Development Director Tim Gladhill Stillwater Planning Commission From: Eric Hansen - Fresh Start Builders Ryan and Mary Collier - Homeowners at 107 East Laurel Street, Stillwater The homeowners at 107 East Laurel Street would like to restore their home to the original look and function by adding a front porch to their home. This front porch is seen in the attached photos from the early 1900s and their desire is to match the look as closely as possible to this original design. Great pains have been taken to keep this home looking as close as possible to its original condition, even the retaining wall is original as seen in the photo. In order to replace the front porch, we will need a setback variance. The current house sits 9' 6" from the property line, and in order to add the porch, we would need to be 3' 6" from the front property line. We believe this project meets the conditions required to grant a variance for the following reasons: (1) The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter. While the setback requirements are necessary to prevent a tunneling effect in our street corridors, restoring an open front porch to this home would not be out of harmony with that purpose. Site lines would not be affected, nor would massing be any greater than it currently is with the existing historic home and retaining wall's locations. (2) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The comp plan encourages community as well as restoration of our historical homes, and this project fits well with these goals. (3) The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this chapter. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply: (i) The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls; A front porch is reasonable and desirable in Stillwater and has been since it was originally established in the 1800s. (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner; and This home was platted in the 1800s and the current homeowners had no say in the decision to place the home as close to the street as it is. Additionally, they had no say in the removal of the original front porch and only want to see it restored to its original state. (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The restoration of a front porch to this home would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, it would simply restore the charm and community orientation of this historic block of Stillwater. This decision is not economics based, the homeowners are simply trying to restore the home to its original condition and have a place to enjoy their community that's larger than their current front stoop. We thank you for your time and your consideration. A Collier Porch 001 scale: 1/16"=1' Laurel Street 100,-o" Lot Coverage Calculations: - Existing House: 1385 SF - Existing Attached garage: 486 SF - Existing Shed: 80SF - Open Porch Addition: 135 SF Existing Lot Coverage: 1951 SF New Total Lot Coverage: 2086 SF Lot Total (According to Washington County Assessors): 8276 Total Coverage Now: 23.5% Total Coverage Proposed: 25% Collier Addition FRESH START BUILDERS DESIGN PLANS ARE PROVIDED FOR Ryan and Mary Collier ■,� F���I FRESH START COMPANIES, INC. THE FAIR USE OF THE CLIENT IN COMPLETING THE PROJECT AS 1-1901 0 Site Plan 107 Laurel Street East SIXTH AVE S ■T��T LISTED. DESIGN PLANS REMAIN THE Stillwater, MN / I STILLWATER, MN 55082 P: 651.430.2412 F: 651.304.1242 PROPERTY OF FRESH START BUILDERS AND CANNOT BE USED OR DRAWN BY: ERIC HANSEN, AKBD B U L ❑ E R S WWW.FRESHSTARTMN.COM REUSED WITHOUT PERMISSION. i 1 r 2/2,1 tn 12"Dia. Conc. Pier Ftgs. x 48" Deep. Flair Btm. to 1 b" Existing Windows & Entry Door / I Simpson DDT-1Z Tension Tie As Req. By Code With 1/2" x b" Lag Screws gi I fi 0 @ I 16" O.G. Staggered 1 /2 ,l'i 12"Dia. Conc. Pier Ftgs. x 48" Deep. S Simpson BC5 2-3/6 Post tts. I Flair Btm. to 18" ToBeam Connector '11_) i—1 6 x b Treaded Posts With x 3-2x8 Treated Seam c;+ I L CZ\ Galv. Post Anchor 2 x 8 Treated Ledger Board Fastened To House Rim 10'-2 1 /2" 20 -5" PORCH FOUNDATION PLAN 1/4"=11-0" 2 x 8 Treated Jois Proposed Porch T&G Fir Decking And T&G Beadboard Ceiling / I b x 6 Permacast Turned Posts / Hand Frame This With Spandrels ( By Vintage / Area With Barrel Vault Woodworks) between Posts b' / 2 - 2 x 10 Beam Abv. Wraped With 1x Miratec Cr) Walk To Be Removed Existing Concrete 20'-5" 1/2 Elevation Existing Retaining Wall 1.,(1 V \ #1\il V 116 \V V Existing Concrete Walk Existing Concrete Walk And Steps — -1 PROPOSED PORCH FLOOR PLAN 1/4"=t-0" 1 Foot Offset From Corners 2/2 ,11 33 tr) • 17171IPZIII.II I I 'sting Concrete Steps__ Existing Retaining Walls Collier Residence 107 Laurel Street Stillwater, MN FRESH START BUILDERS DATE: 4/6/2022 SHEET: Existing Windows Soffit & Fascia To Match fisting andre s By tang Wood b X b P'erfnacast urned Posts &G Fird ckin 1 x 10 Painted Finish Rim 1 1' I, 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1_ 1 I 11 1 1 1 II II II IL II 11IL 11 Spandrels By Vintange Wood Works 6 x 6 Permacast Turned Posts T&G Fir decking r 1 x 10 Painted Finish Rim FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 3/16"=1'-0" Left Side Sim. 3/16"=1'-0" Shingles To Match Existing 15# Asphalt Felt 1/2" Plywood Roof Shthg. Roof Trusses @ 24"O.C. 1 x 4 Pine Sub Fascia 1 x 8 Miratec Fascia Painted 3/8" Beadboard Soffit Painted Step With 7 1/2"Max Max Riser 12" Dia.x 48" Conc. Pier Footing Flawed At Btm. To 18" Flashing 12 uC�l I V 2 x Ledger Boards Lag P screwed To The house Stud Wall With 3/8" x 5" Torx r—Screws @ 16" O.C. 2-2x10 Beam IllIIIlIIlIlll i Spandrels By Vintange Wood Works 6 x 6 Permacast Turned Posts T&G Fir decking 2 x 8 Treated Joists 10" O.C. Simpson UUI-1L Tension Ties / \ CROSS SECTION 3/16"=1'-0" Collier Residence 107 Laurel Street Stillwater, MN FRESH START BUILDERS DATE: 4/b/2022 SHEET: / % ru WAsi 107 Laurel St E Restoring of Original Front Porch Owners: Ryan & Mary Collier Builder: Fresh Start Builders —1860' s ���;if�tsf�ffa9,l11:1111l1llilll�����t��yi�ll 11 • House is listed Heirloom & Heritage city program • Historical house tour • "Windows of Stillwater" poster • Included in Artist in Residence (Jo Lutz Rollins • We have the original watercolor - was gifted to us from the Casey family (1970s-1990s) on their mother's passing. • Last Sanborn Insurance porches in tack in 1924 • When the porches were know maps show removed is i E. LAUREL i ! � WI .,r i r S FiA,14 D . .._, il ,.1110 +r w 1,0 av - ,yu i M If 4s 0.� 3° Ru \00A y4360ei-J • Leveraging the best match possible from across the country • Vintagewoodworking.com source vendor FRONT ELEVAT1ONI 7" Spud Spdnsl!rei # 4127 7" overall height Hardwood Spool # 1050 42:44caz PP 3201 PP 3202 :Molt • 5 I12" Projection • 5 1f1" P1oterllon 11 • 5 112" width • 5 I/2"WYkdrh 11ght • 96" Hxtgh[ • 116 1 /9" Height PP 3203 • 5 3/13" Projection • 5 3fa" 1Vidth • 15911A" Helghl Heirloom Homes Heirloom Image Description Andrew and Anna Olson built this large, Greek Revival style house, which is visible on the 1870 Bird's Eye View of the City of Stillwater, circa 1860. According to the 1881-1882 city directory Andrew Olson was employed as a clerk at Bronson and Folsom, a general merchandise store on Main Street between Chestnut and Myrtle streets. The Olson's lived in this house for over 40 years. The two-story, frame house rests on a limestone foundation, has clapboard siding and a prominent front gable roof. Its triangular shaped pediment with wide band of trim at the cornice line and two -over -two double -hung windows with decorative crowns are characteristics of the Greek Revival style that was popular in the United States in the mid -nineteenth century. A two-story, gable -roofed rear addition was constructed by the Olson's in 1878. The rear addition features a one-story portico on the east elevation and a brick chimney on the exterior of the west elevation. The one-story bay window that has a hipped roof with scrolled wood brackets and is located on the west elevation of the original house may have been added around the same time or slightly later. Overall, this house is a good example of how to preserve a historic house. Historical Society Photos circa 1898 LI 111 ilillIUllILIIIII, .11111111)11111111(111 AA" Applicant Photos Apparent circa 1880s 4,111,1.. ..,......, .... 6 •-,., , . ,.,. :-%..1:47i."..."'" ..4'..'r 'I ••••,4 ''• . 0.•,,,, : .• ter • , ,4••• .•'•••• , • ". •'• • ... : ...' . . 14 "" ' '.-:-.4.,1 Vn. • -r.. 0...iip.,C1 • lE ,V.:•:.•• : • q.7... 4.-41-' ..,.. 7 " •±.' L ' r'' -Ct.' -,41- . . . ' , .''' . " - + • e 1. • f:;',,. . . ......".-41: 1.:. .lipu- • if"' ,.... 7,0 .1 . , .,,itiM, ,. ,...4. .• V.,„ 1,ii .. 7:rt ' • '. ''' •• •*'2 • ..r. ?Ile • f: -4141' -`,.. .0... .,. ...1 46. , t . 1 ..tre ' ' "7 *lit.. *7 . - rt"--;•i,', e - ....,-......,.... :11 iii.jr • ...!..1,Nlic:' • , ' ,, • ,,e• '; • 4."tr. '"'.. ' '''''''''. : , ir'11(-'1H".1:::' ":1-:-.1!.r.A.--,15:;?::7.4.?::' '''' 414'.:: ''' .. ill; ' ' 4.4 . _ ,• IF:— A '4,0 ,., . ;:,1'..T- A: -':' ' •;.....,;:t '',..i."1 p a 11°''''S.:.411'''''Itter' '''''''' ' ''..-"4-i' --. -- ,...," , .0,1*. . • , ' ' ' . '' 4.. 4 ...i: .,... itTr` .w.."• -.• ,,frN7,, 4....-4....... • ,,, ,..1,•;.,.. - :IN' r•,;,: .....6; V.:J., %.1. , . If 6.4 1 '''' .. Of' '''' ' *15r' • G4401 „ .... Atpoi..41.'- • , ,- A , .... I.-, ,.,., 1 .: f: -".' : . ,, • 1 ' . • 6,41: • ..i.. ''..:. '.. ,40 , ,....... ......„. .1. .1.0%,..r. ., -'..--- • ..111.1 • . • . . • Proposal • ,011"pmsi jylkilivitop*4,1Ap. VI110141.0 .‘"L .414. I II _ Existing Retaining Walls Ulwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT TO: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: DISTRICT: REPORT BY: Planning Commission CASE NO.: CD 2022-26 May 25, 2022 Paul and Luane Braggers Paul and Luane Braggers Consideration of an impervious surface maximum Variance for a deck. 3490 87th Street North TR—Traditional Residential District and Shoreland Overlay District Frannie Nielsen, Interim Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Paul and Luane Bruggers own the property at 3490 87th Street North and are requesting consideration of a Variance to allow impervious surface coverage over 25% as limited by the Shoreland Overlay district. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow 36.3% lot coverage to permit the construction of a 10' x 14' deck. The property is located in the Nottingham Village subdivision and the Shoreland Overlay District. The property currently has approximately 34.7% lot coverage with 3,013 square feet of impervious coverage on the 8,685 square foot lot. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the following variance: 1. A variance to Section 31-402 Subd. 7 (j) to increase the maximum allowed lot coverage from 25% to 36.3%. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. CD 2022-26 May 25, 2022 Page 2 The property is zoned TR, Traditional Residential. The existing and proposed uses are compatible in the TR zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. • What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of a maximum impervious surface coverage is to create uniform development within the zoning district and maintain adequate stormwater management. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? The proposed variance to lot coverage would not be out of harmony with the Zoning Code. City staff approved plans for a home construction with an impervious surface coverage of 34.7% without a deck. The use of the deck and the minimal increase to impervious surface coverage is not out of harmony with the zoning code. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain and improve Stillwater's existing housing stock. The proposed variance to lot coverage would act as an improvement to the existing housing. The proposed variances would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". • Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? The applicants are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; decks are an allowed use in the TR zoning district. 10' x 14' is a reasonable deck size. The applicant is proposing to maintain pervious cover underneath the deck as to minimize effects of an increased impervious surface coverage. • Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property. The applicants are limited to 2,171 square feet of coverage on their 8,685 square foot lot. The property currently has 3,013 square feet of lot coverage and therefore no additional coverage is permitted. Due to city staff approving a coverage of 34.7%, unique circumstances were created for the property. • Are the circumstances created by the landowner? CD 2022-26 May 25, 2022 Page 3 The property owner did not create these circumstances. City Staff approved the impervious surface coverage of 34.7% without considering the Shoreland Overlay district standards and any additions needed for the property. The applicants intended to construct a deck following the construction of the house. City Staff created unique circumstances for the applicant by approving an impervious surface coverage of 34.7%. • If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? The proposed variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed and existing uses are permitted in the TR zoning district. This property is not subject to additional design standards or design review. • Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire for the variances is due to factors apart economic considerations. The variance request is due to previous approvals rather than economic considerations. The cost of the deck would remain consistent with or without the granting of a variance. ALTERNATIVES A. Approval. If the Planning Commission finds the request in conformance to the City Code requirements for the issuance of a variance, it could approve the variance with (at least) the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with Case CD 2022-26, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director in advance. Any major changes will need to the Planning Commission for Use Permit amendment review and approval. 3. Lot coverage in excess of the 25% allowed shall meet Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization's infiltration requirements. B. Table. If the Planning Commission finds the request to have insufficient information, the case could be tabled. C. Denial. If the Planning Commission finds the request to be inconsistent with City Code, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The property's condition is not a result of the applicant and is quite unique. The proposed improvement is not inconsistent with the neighborhood it is situated in. The property owner has made a reasonable request to construct a deck to enjoy their property. The applicants have shown that the proposed improvement generally conforms to the intent of the Zoning Code. CD 2022-26 May 25, 2022 Page 4 Given these findings, staff finds that — with reasonable conditions — the request conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance and recommends approval of the variances with conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Site Location Map Variance Application Sketch Plan cc: Paul and Luane Bruggers : . % .., , ,, ., „:„.., -ti I lwater . �s y � . . ..0. I`� '.; The Birthplace of Minnesota �y ar 4 �1 4= = " Site Location 3490 87th St N i V/ _ i.�y y / ` 0 70 140 280 Feet 4.,.:, ky.1"p l t O 1 .. �� • 4. General Site Location 87TH ST NO '___,_ '"' i * — ii.P.T4 ;. v4V -.' 11 4 , IN Ili: '•;,,J r' ®® V4 RMM MIME ../ 11 i�+/lam'Ann, 1 MCKUSICK ROAD fillwater Planning Department 216 el Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www. c i. stillw a.t er. nnn. us P1anningDeptr ci.stillwater.rnn.us PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Commission ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit yr Variance Resubdivision* Subdivision* Lot Line Adjustment* Please read carefully: Case. No. Base Fee: Date Filed: + County Recording fee Receipt No.: $50 per document +Tech Fee:$25.UO Total Fees: Compreliensive Plan. Amendment* Zoning ..Amendment* Planning Unit. Development * Certificate. of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney, engineering fees and recording fees. • Onlyone copy of supporting materials is required. However, any documents Larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and in pdf format. Review: the `Checklist to the Planning Administration Application Form'. for the complete list of required items that must be submitted. Any incomplete application or supporting material will cause your application to be rejected by the. City. 4. Applications will be rejected without a legal description.:A legal description is found on the deed to the. property. Attach as an exhibit if necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receivea zoning use permit which must besigned and submittedto the City to obtainthe required building permits. 1 PROPERTY . IDENTIFICATION Address of Project $`s i 1)� V 14 & N 1 1 t \W & e-y Assessor's Parcel No. Complete. Property Legal Description Zoning District Description ofProject 1Nco LA. -FC r c, 1rc, e.* f • 5, ock �J' 1VD+I"i JriUYA (PIN Number) �•E-1».y. illwater PlanningDepartment 216 4 i Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www. c i. s t illwater, mn.0 s PlanningDept(vei. stil lwater.mn.us APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DISCLOSUIIE Please check each box toindicateyou agree to: the following statements: I understandthat all information submitted for this application is subject to the Data Practices Act and that all data is presumed public data and can be made available to the public. I understand the City hasthe ultimate authority to determine what may be considered non-public data. 14".1. hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in, is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. I hereby state I willcomply withthe permit if it is granted and used. Minn. Stat. § 13.37 allows certain data to be considered non-public data because it contains a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process (1) that was supplied by me or an organization contracted by me; (2) that is the subjectof efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy, and (3) that .derives: independent economic value, actual or potential, fromnot being generally known. to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. Please list any materials you believe meet the criteriaabove and are therefore non-public data. N one, By signingl agree to the statements above. By signing agree to the statements above. Required Required (If other than property owner) Property Owner 'PRLl1 4 % alytL 15T L4.c3 6 Representative Mailing Address 39 c p $i 0. 51-. RI.J V Mailing Address City State— Zip 5t-111vJk4tr, MN 55p$ 2- City -State — Zip Telephone No. 6I 2-4 la )111 (i) ilV 2D1-335% Le) Telephone No. Email 0:71rucc yLp�.l�•!`Avn ��1].p,�r�e5 Email Signature e (Sege nature is required) Signature. (Signature is required) Paul and Luane Bruggers 3490 87th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Stillwater. City Planner Abbi Jo Wittman 216 4th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 April 9, 2022 Dear Abbi, We recently built a house in the Nottingham Development of Stillwater in October 2021. We would like to apply for a variance to the 35% impervious coverage requirement, in order to add a 10' x 14' deck to the East side of our home. We understand the purpose of the impervious. coverage requirement is to .allow for adequate stormwater management. We intend to install a maintenance free deck with a permeable landscape fabric and rock beneath the deck. The deck boards will be spaced far enough apart, based on your recommendation, to allow the water to flow to the rock below — which is a permeable surface. We believe a deck of this modest size is appropriate for our single-family home and the related property and will not alter the character of the neighborhood. A 10' x 14' deck will allow room for a grill and a simple patio table and chairs to be enjoyed by our family and friends during the warm months.. We appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, 1-973-1-0 Paul Bruggers Luane Bruggers lays estimated price. Future pricing may go up or down. Tar, labor, and delivery not included Design & Buy DECK tw• to recall and purchase your design at home: 1. On Menerds.com, enter "Design & Buy" in the search bar 2. Select the Deck Designer 3. Recall your design by entering Design ID: 319852704806 4. Follow the on -screen purchasing instructions How to purchase your design at the store: 1. Enter Design ID: 319852704806 at the Design -It Center Kiosk in the Building Materials Department 2. Follow the on -screen purchasing instructions 0 b rr r r 10' 0" 10' 0" 13' 8" LI 3' 8,. 10' 0" Deck Side Color Legend 3' 8" 0 0 en Side/No Railin Railin Unattached Walls Attached Walls illustration intended to show general deck size and shape. Some options may not be shown for picture clarity. Estimated Price: 'Taday's estimated price_ Future pricing may go up or down. Tar, labor, and delivery not included Layout dimension sheets are intended as a construction rid. Not all options selected are shown. Final design should be performed by a registered professional engineer to ensure all applicable building codes and regulations arc met. s is an estimate. It is only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based on this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to nge depending upon the market condition. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to :ntory conditions. MENARDS 1S NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTII HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY .TERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by the guest. Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate, including but not ited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED E SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BECAUSE OF T11E WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIAL ,TED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. .SZ'L£6 M.40,1,0.09 3 :£O, .O N Irmanvax' A a BRr6 II1.(I) Nm (q VJ. NCh gEM"TmImo. cam. • LL 0 QQ'S9 B at0,40.0 N ayr1 y+ MMIAj I (0Z�)f�4. 6 MS M .£ @ R9 H.L8ON 133e115 H1L9 I- LL. w 2 � =' E �C7 • .2 2 U❑ • O❑U d G ❑ ❑ 111 iNl.l Vi. • ce'.�❑� 1L2 �� �aQ:O.O as m ram �W - i--P - -- UZ OD >W2. gal Z�y gn zce Z.❑ 00 . Wo ❑ z aG U4. D. J:� 0„) J ¢m. :a V LL [] L'�: Q ❑ � ul W ¢.w W � ... ' w.p du- m.w. 0 ❑❑ v p 2 Q.Q r, �.LL.cemz z Z m Q❑ w a❑ ] J Jp' �J �'❑ ¢❑ J'_ �] H OW.O_z LL.LLD 0LLLLLO U1W �JN J��'p. w.oz N2❑.� Q❑S�i.IQ ❑q�L�li❑ N11- � Q�=mQ. �x�� F OF ND°OMB ¢¢ = LL. �:wy- F. bwrQ QQ.QQ.NQo�� emu- o. ❑.(�Wm tr�in(n(n wWWW •WWWW IU .Q❑ ZZa wWPlH fRtifll.W-co.cow— .zw p'ww 222E aaaa a�a�,.m i-Q ei aJN ❑❑❑❑ �DDQ❑ mQ Y'O U'[[I q.p'O [C tY AC fZ'.� fL' ILI ►�- .. q i�i Q O dadm,• LLLLA U2 ❑W J5.Ch. IF II II II II.II 11 31 m W m .W17 w p wW .W T:Q+ Oaj D,.,v oo• vdi• g. s ,c4: lli Q IX. M� n w L'7 N ✓♦ N N m C7 .� N N c] 17 W W I--. ❑ Q Q. m m N N r r N N ' T ❑❑ 4 x me... mwmm .IF Qf!]U) 1YF93 (1 O S SJY53 flYa 1- W LL li g N W j P.J LAND SURVEYING, LLC ea z 2 T: gr OM I 0 N u. (0 r ZAsaar ATLS bf Nun AO OP' s G°Qo.QQ- 0 re 3d avanul U1 0 Z to m Oil NIA A ns aNvi r d N yny C F orn N > a 33 z N { O Z 00.00.0 S s 3'04'07• W R=470.00' (B246j JJ ( (s26s1++l` 15.05 ---- ✓ m ij 00 m- w xi ea 'afl r °i- 0 0 (n za 00 0 0 C 0 z z z m W 0 XI vm 03 MI m m 20 m :� z ' O= 3 C 01 min a -n zv m mA 0 Z Dp n�° m m m CJ 2 0 it z O Tmm mm mi CO CO Go (0 mmtOin w W N IV w w 3V fJ1 co .4 cn C Gil OP N C2 II it II II --E IT it 31 11 'a-Uvro 00002 0000 00 v.. roro•i "0 017 0000 coo NCAN 000(0 mmmmP mmmm v000 ovoo '0u' °a0 °°°av 0m00 °(00° .n-Im.73 T-ImT 0 ?3 ?1 0 Or Or ZC rn�m0 CCZ -te zz> 0 Z fZ 0 I CO ® (0 O LA ❑DDD 0000 m m m m ca xi Na,a Oz°0zm z ma 0mWIErn cn�a Z� 87TH STREET NORTH 9J ar .zi co 0 01w o 1 S 6' 26 w ' � � 'o 10.77', 65.29'- S 6.001/0' W + 0'08UESM7 eni2, r Uri ` " fk 408UESMT �r n @ad,UfiS17 1 .�o r m0 .002 5.1 7.1 td S 0'04'04" W 131.25' '. Porch uer ?& T1 111 C Z coo me m y au GI G�1 rn 0.1 I4 Di U ESMI N 0'04'04" E 65.00' 4. � 12.87 + 100&UESMT + W 444. N 1¢DIU E6M7 N 0.04'03" E 76.35` Ulwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT TO: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: DISTRICT: REPORT BY: Planning Commission May 25, 2022 Eric and Teresa Johnson Eric and Teresa Johnson CASE NO.: CD 2022-27 Consideration of structural impervious surface maximum Variance for a deck. 3610 Wright Street RB—Two Family Residential District Frannie Nielsen, Interim Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Eric and Teresa Johnson own the property at 3610 Wright Street and are requesting consideration of a Variance to allow structural impervious surface coverage over 25% as limited by the RB— Two Family Residential zoning district. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow 27.3% structural coverage to permit the construction of a 12' x 24' deck and stairs. The property is well under the 25% maximum "other" impervious surface coverage at 7.6%. The property has the potential to add 2,056 square feet of other impervious surface coverage and only 14 square feet of structural impervious surface coverage. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the following variance: 1. A variance to Section 31-308. - RB two-family district to increase the maximum allowed structural coverage from 25% to 27.3%. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. CD 2022-27 May 25, 2022 Page 2 The property is zoned RB—Two Family residential district. The existing and proposed uses are compatible in the RB zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. • What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of a maximum structural impervious surface coverage is to create uniform development within the zoning district and maintain adequate stormwater management. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? The proposed variance to lot coverage would not be out of harmony with the Zoning Code. City staff approved plans for a home construction with a structural impervious surface coverage of 24.8% without a deck. The use of the deck and the minimal increase to structural impervious surface coverage is not out of harmony with the zoning code. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain and improve Stillwater's existing housing stock. The proposed variance to lot coverage would act as an improvement to the existing housing. The proposed variances would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". • Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? The applicants are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; decks are an allowed use in the RB zoning district. 12' x 24' is a reasonable deck size. The house was designed to have a deck in the location the applicants are requesting; a deck increases the safety and practicality of the home. • Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property. The applicants are limited to 2,962 square feet of structural coverage on their 11,848 square foot lot. The property currently has 2,948 square feet of lot coverage and therefore only 14 square feet of additional structural coverage is permitted. The property is unique as the house has an elevated entrance that cannot be reached from ground level. Due to city staff approving a structural coverage of 24.8% with the layout of the house indicating the need for a deck, unique circumstances were created for the property. CD 2022-27 May 25, 2022 Page 3 • Are the circumstances created by the landowner? The property owner did not create these circumstances. City Staff approved the structural impervious surface coverage of 24.8% without considering the elevated entrance needing additional structural coverage to obtain access into the home. City Staff created unique circumstances for the applicant by approving structural impervious surface coverage of 24.8%. • If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? The proposed variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed and existing uses are permitted in the RB zoning district. This property is not subject to additional design standards or design review. • Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire for the variances is due to factors apart economic considerations. The variance request is due to previous approvals rather than economic considerations. The cost of the deck would remain consistent with or without the granting of a variance. ALTERNATIVE S A. Approval. If the Planning Commission finds the request in conformance to the City Code requirements for the issuance of a variance, it could approve the variance with (at least) the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with Case CD 2022-27, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director in advance. Any major changes will need to the Planning Commission for Use Permit amendment review and approval. 3. Lot coverage in excess of the 25% allowed shall meet Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization's infiltration requirements. B. Table. If the Planning Commission finds the request to have insufficient information, the case could be tabled. C. Denial. If the Planning Commission finds the request to be inconsistent with City Code, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The property's condition is not a result of the applicant and is quite unique. The proposed improvement is not inconsistent with the neighborhood it is situated in. The property owner has made a reasonable request to construct a deck to enjoy their property. The applicants have shown that the proposed improvement generally conforms to the intent of the Zoning Code. CD 2022-27 May 25, 2022 Page 4 Given these findings, staff finds that — with reasonable conditions — the request conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance and recommends approval of the variances with conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Site Location Map Variance Application Lot Coverage Worksheet cc: Eric and Teresa Johnson tUwater Planning Department PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Commission ACTION REQUESTED 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.tnn.us PlanningDept@ei.stillwater.mn.us Case No. Base Fee: Date Filed: + County Recording fee Receipt No.: 2,15 V 1, J Y $50 per document + Tech Fee: $25.00 Total Fees: 4 61G Special/Conditional Use Permit Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Vai iauce Zoning Amendment* Resubdivision* Planning Unit Development * Subdivision* Certificate of Compliance Lot Line Adjustment* *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney, engineering fees and recording fees. Please read carefully: • Only one copy of supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and in pdf format. • Review the `Checklist to the Planning Administration Application Form' for the complete list of required items that must be submitted. Any incomplete application or supporting material will cause your application to be rejected by the City. • Applications will be rejected without a legal description. A legal description is found on the deed to the property. Attach as an exhibit if necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. Address of Project PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION `e /o 1,0k. tatt— S I . Assessor's Parcel No. i'L 030- ?f)► 3 z, 00'/1 B� K 2 )i(1 �l} \ (PI1Y NumbeC�r� � Complete Property Legal Description ! -�� 1 ( C T �� STi�1T % ;�I- ► % Zoning DistrictRa Vription of Project "AO)l 1 ?—' [,r f % i C . /A; I i- je_ �i � iflwater Planning Department 216 4`1' Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us PlanningDept@ci.stillwater.mn.us •R. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DISCLOSURE Please check each box to indicate you agree to the following statements: I understand that all information submitted for this application is subject to the Data Practices Act and that all • data ispresumed public data and can be made available to the public. I understand the City has the ultimate authority to determine what may be considered non-public data. I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in, is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. I hereby state I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used. Minn. Stat. §13.37 allows certain data to be considered non-public data because it contains a formula, pattern,.cdmpilation, program, device, method, technique or process (1) that was supplied by me or an organization contracted by me, (2) that is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy, and (3) that derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. Please list any materials you believe meet the criteria above and are therefore non-public data. By signing I agree to the statements above. By signing I agree to the statements above. Required Required (If other than property owner) Property Owner E IC'_ i(),-)A)SCYJ Representative Mailing Address 36/i) GO'2.4r1-1 Mailing Address City - State — Zip f11_1- w \ eZ. M/U ;j J5�2 City - State — Zip Telephone No. I S 2 - 393 " 5 / 9` ' Telephone No. Email -r14-. 1 t/ . 3C2 , =r„t : COM Email SignatureSignature (Signatu�• is required) (Signature is required) May 2021 From: Terri and Eric terericjohnson@gmail.com Subject: letter Date: Apr 14, 2022 at 9:25:02 AM To: Eric and Terri Johnson terericjohnson@gmail.com April 14, 2022 To Stillwater Planning Commission, We would like to request a variance on our property, 3610W.,..ri,ght Street, for the construction of a 12 x 20 foot deck. We feel confident that we meet the requirements for a variance, as outlined below. I. Our proposal to build a deck is reasonable, in order to use and enjoy our property. In fact, without a deck, we would be left with an unusable second floor sliding glass door. II. The footprint of our home as built by the developer and approved by the City, leaves no room for future development such as the addition of a deck (without a variance). This circumstance was not created by us, and we were unaware of any possible concern when we purchased our home. III. Every home in our neighborhood has a similarly constructed home with a sliding glass door leading to a deck or patio. Thus, the character of our neighborhood would not be altered by granting this variance. We appreciate your attention and your consideration. Thank you, Eric and Terri Johnson e-- vt4A97br0 I.0R-4 err i 6'r11--L14)Pcre , MAJ 5-52:%',S L_ Lot area =11695 S house ores .2875 S; Porch mea .73 SF Structure! area w24.8% Sidewalk area =41 SF Daveray wee =865 SF Total `rnp,,vlws Area -3554 SF impervious coverop =32.;SR • ?`}'• Csa.it.s 4esdss oweta sreeswr 0xr 9sesea srst�s kw 'i: Soweta teetweee Se. o COC Co 5ensta sense ssiat-8e t OIW a0 } Osnefse wows 8ur4,00, Gs^o;n 4t*¢t+00 eer s nta4 thee!a Wet REVISED 11 /7/2017 GRADING AS —BUILT 1 Gro0. Fp pion oy Stevcn6 Fort dated 6/2/15 twos uses so dtlwms.e proposeo etsrotons shown heroes 2 No sossil c saws invest gsNon ► O been pef foons0 00 thts tot oy the an oettr. the seitobi ty of soles to amp:et the epee'Oc novae e not the rospoherbCity of the /w woof ante ra1l14800e odes .ot Derpat to uww saxments other tote•' those shown onthe eaeaded pot. e ti*winos stoats re baud on o+ assutrled datum. PISNEERengineering, RA hr. Un« Pk :(651F611.1914 541:o Fan: 1651)919*.oes www,g,a eetratF..xen Isdsstt+1t6t4.3010 1Fo doe u.7S231Theetttid.V7VSJ ....we,. 0aen:nn revmbz• ear' g.e4:^<, plar.:9t2.9 Loses' ncn, e.evoc:on oar grading ,^!a+; r 909,7 71 1119 a / Lowest F'oo. Elevation ;( .7) / Toi. Or rm+^•datian Eler :(9-10.4) /918.5 Garage Suet: Elev. 0 Door ;(9177) /917.9 T_7`,F.. Ewen-50n 9 Locked 1: (912.9) /9139 err Wereek was BMes11707 t v 401ea 05/29/„ Lot 9, Blodt 2, RUTHERFORD STATION FIRST ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof Washington County, Minnesota Address: 3610 Wright S1roeE, StilWOtor, Minnesota House Model: Cambridge II DL4at at: A 84*o Johnson lava saese* nIun -. :sport fsws4h, .nf ;eat + an. a 9. #fe 5W4e at kinaesolr.. r:R 10' anrn.r.rr. To, V l Fl.groot Lois 6--; F<,cal. FJrm:=on 9.0e. 20 Certificate of Survey for:, CalAtlantic Homes 7594 Anagrom 0t Edon P,u,ric. MN 5580.7199 Phone (952) 22o.6000: Fes: 19521229.602e J 6100 fnginrc role. CITY OF STILLWATER 216 Fourth Street North Stillwater MN. 55082 651-430-88u0 04/15/2022 03:25 PM Receipt Number: 00251155 Customer Number: 000000 Receipt Total: 175.00 Check Amount: 175.00 Check Number: 16030 Cash Amount:0.00 Change: 0.00 100-0000-3870-0150 Technology Fee 100-0000-3520-0300 Variance Variance 3610 Wright St 25.00 150.00 ESTIMATED LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Date: 5/6/2022 Prepared By: Frannie Nielsen Address: 3610 Wright St, Stillwater, MN Lot Size: 11,848 SF Zone District: RB Maximum Coverage Allowed Structural % = 25 S.F. = 2,962 Impervious % = 25 S.F. = 2,962 Total % = 50 S.F. = 5,924 Existing Coverage* *Estimates are based on Washington County Assessors data, aerial imagery measurements and other sources. Information herein shall not be used as a replacement of a survey or accurate site plan. House 2875 SF Addition(s) Porch/Deck 73 SF Garage Total 2,948 SF 1 24.8% Walkway 41 SF Driveway 865 SF Patio Other Total 906 SF 1 7.6% Structural 2,948 SF Other Impervious 906 SF Total 3,854 SF 1 32.4% Additional Coverages Permitted Structural Impervious Total 14 SF 2,056 SF 2,070 SF NOTES Ulwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT TO: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: DISTRICT: REPORT BY: Planning Commission May 25, 2022 Brandon and Dawn Kotval Brandon and Dawn Kotval CASE NO.: CD 2022-28 Consideration of an impervious surface maximum Variance for a three -car garage. 7155 Melville Court North LR—Lakeshore Residential District and Shoreland Overlay District Frannie Nielsen, Interim Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Brandon and Dawn Kotval own the property at 7155 Melville Court North and are requesting consideration of a Variance to allow total garage floor area over 1000 square feet. The property currently has an attached garage of 853 square feet. Section 31-303 (c) (1) limits the maximum garage area to 1000 square feet. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit the construction of a 24' x 40' three -car garage totaling 1,813 square feet of garage floor area. The property is located in the Jackson Estates subdivision and the Shoreland Overlay District. The property currently has approximately 11% lot coverage with approximately 11,233 square feet of impervious coverage on the 102,338 square foot lot. The additional proposed garage would put the property at approximately 12% lot coverage. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the following variance: 1. A variance to Section 31-303 (c) (1) to allow 813 additional square feet to the 1,000 square foot maximum for garage floor area. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. CD 2022-28 May 25, 2022 Page 2 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. The property is zoned LR, Lakeshore Residential. The existing and proposed uses are compatible in the LR zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. • What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of a maximum garage floor area is to create uniform development within the zoning district and maintain adequate stormwater management. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? The proposed variance to garage floor area would not be out of harmony with the Zoning Code. The Zoning Code allows garages the size of the proposed garage. The existing 853 square foot garage is attached to the principal dwelling. The proposed changes meet lot coverage requirements. The construction of a 960 square foot garage is not out of harmony with the Zoning Code. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain and improve Stillwater's existing housing stock. The proposed variance to maximum garage floor area would act as an improvement to the existing housing. The proposed variances would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". • Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? The applicants are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; detached garages are an allowed use in the LR zoning district. The garage can provide additional storage for vehicles and personal equipment to minimize exterior storage on the property. • Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property. The applicants are limited to 147 square feet of additional garage floor area. The current 853 square foot garage limits any additional garage floor area to a small shed size garage that cannot store excess exterior storage as requested by the applicants. • Are the circumstances created by the landowner? CD 2022-28 May 25, 2022 Page 3 The property owner did not create these circumstances. The current property owners did not create the existing 853 square foot garage. • If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? The proposed variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed and existing uses are permitted in the LR zoning district. This property is not subject to additional design standards or design review. • Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire for the variances is due to factors apart economic considerations. The variance request is due to previous approvals rather than economic considerations. The cost of the garage would remain consistent with or without the granting of a variance. ALTERNATIVE S A. Approval. If the Planning Commission finds the request in conformance to the City Code requirements for the issuance of a variance, it could approve the variance with (at least) the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with Case CD 2022-28, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director in advance. Any major changes will need to the Planning Commission for Use Permit amendment review and approval. 3. The garage shall meet required setbacks of the LR and Shoreland Overlay districts. 4. Lot coverage in excess of the 25% allowed shall meet Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization's infiltration requirements. B. Table. If the Planning Commission finds the request to have insufficient information, the case could be tabled. C. Denial. If the Planning Commission finds the request to be inconsistent with City Code, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The property's condition is not a result of the applicant and is quite unique. The proposed improvement is not inconsistent with the neighborhood it is situated in. The property owner has made a reasonable request to construct a garage to enjoy their property. The applicants have shown that the proposed improvement generally conforms to the intent of the Zoning Code. Given these findings, staff finds that — with reasonable conditions — the request conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance and recommends approval of the variances with conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. CD 2022-28 May 25, 2022 Page 4 Attachments: Site Location Map Variance Application Applicant Narrative cc: Brandon and Dawn Kotval lihiwater Planning Department c n:unity.M0lapment-bepadmgrrt PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Commission Received APR 1 rCD 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us Case No. Date Filed: Base Fee: Tech Fee: $25.00_ � �� Receipt No.: ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Zoning Amendment* Variance Planning Unit Development * Resubdivision Certificate of Compliance Subdivision* Lot Line Adjustment Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Nonconforming Use Change *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney and engineering fees. The fees for requested action are attached to this application. The applicant is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of all forms and supporting material submitted in connection with any application. All supporting material (i e., photos, sketches, etc.) submitted with application becomes the property of the City of Stillwater. Only one copy of supporting materials are required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and in pdf format. Review the Checklist to the Planning Administration Application Form for the complete list of required items that must be submitted! Any incomplete application or supporting material will cause your application to be rejected by the City. Required — Applications will be rejected without a legal description. A legal description is found on the deed to the property. Attach as an exhibit if necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project ? / S 5 el J i ! ! tL C 1 iJoettk Assessor's Parcel No. 3 03o . 2.0.43 -D D P-t (PIN Number) Complete Property Legal Description* (*Required — Applications will be rejected without a legal description) Tax descriptions and property descriptions from the county are not acceptable. } �j Zoning District Description of Project D �-G.d V� - H4rte- cam" 9e-f "1 hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief to be true and correct. 1 further certify 1 will comply with the permit if it is granted and used." Required i If other than property owner Property Owner 3 (4MU`C�{j�i o Doi.2 tll !�� �l.` Representative Mailing Address _ �] / S 4_[ (41,14, CI' Ai Mailing Address L City - State — Zip S-k 11tA3Gck -p-- ticOS)— City - State — Zip Telephone No. Telephone No. Email Email Signature_ Signature (Signature is required) THIS SURVEY PREPARED FOR : Rick Reidt 7155 Melville Court North Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 LEGAL DESCRIPTION : CERTIFICATE of SURVEY Lot 3, Block 1, JACKSON ESTATES, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota 60 IF SCALE: Inch = 50 Feot TA JACKSON `moo• C �`3•a �Q )c)17 • / '.4 / / kP.A3 Drainage And Utility Easements `17. ``DS' 17. 3 L=�52.75 ?2 �� 57. f Q L R=sa. a0 rr� „p tlJ CO i� /l•eI 1 ESTA TES -l317�_4 Buildin / a; • Setback Lines fife Ike 4 • Minimum Basemen! floor■ Elevation = 893.8 Fee! •(Resfrlr;tionPee Pot) \ 40 Radial Line NORTH , L=41.22 R=3O/.Oa-' - 4 =78'48'54" - SITE BENCHMARK RR Spike in Base of 40 Inch Oak Tree Elevation = 914.65 ‘Al a 5 £ia 2 0,• 500 SB1'S1 `16"E 603/ b11 _ �*t Proposed Elevations (Per Builder) GARAGE FLOOR = 919.63 BASEMENT FLOOR = 913.38 FIRST FLOOR = 923.43 I$' LAKE CLASSIFICAON --LS-2 NORMAL ORDINARY NIGH WATER ELEVATION = 891,5 FEET (DNR) 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION = 892.8 FEET ` WATER SURFACE ELEVATION ON 4-5-90 = 890.73 FEET ----Droinoge Easement / \ Folz, Freeman, Dupay & Associates, Inc. Flu 7tt. LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING 1815 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 (612) 439-8833 N8 4:99. 39ir r NOTES O DilYOTES t/2 INCH IRON PrPE MONUMENT T AND MARRED NTH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "FREEMAN RLS 15989". UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. DENOTES t/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT FOUND AND MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "RLS e2324', UNLESS SHOWN ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM 15 ENE RECORDED PLAT OF JACKSON ESTATES 263, 91 LAKE INDEX NO. 82-21P CLASSIFIED AS PROTEC:ED - BY THE DNR-DIVISION OF WATERS 274 39 4 03 trb sO / / / / / / / / / / / B / IIfIIIIINN111111IIJjff M1111iIIfhIIHIIJJ lII 3003020430014 7255 MELVILLE CT N• I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DRAWING IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OE THIS SURVEY AND ALL MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN PLACED IN THE Ww3UNWAS PREPARED IlY ME OR UNDER OMY DIRECT SUPERMSIOe ANO ISHORN. THIS SURVEY OR PA A DULY 16EGISTEREO LAND SURVEYOR OND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. i 1 r OS BRUCE A. FOIL ESOTA REGISTRATION N4 •23 . DATE: I• TIMOTHY a 1 AN INNES'TA REGISTRATION NO. t8 GRAD L. DUPA MINNF'ATA RECWSTRA710N NO. 17252 NOTE; OFFICIAL COPIES OF THIS MAP ARE CRIMP SEALED- 6 1998 - Folz, Freeman, Dupey rc Aasreiates, Inc. - Ali Rights Reserved Design ID: 312952323886 Estimate ID: 20937 18' 3' 3' w a r- Endwall A t r 1 Endwall B Design & Bur GARAG E cA -t= I— 2'6" 1 10' I 2'6"10'2'6"110' 26 —I 40• Estimated Price: * Today's estimated price, future pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. 24' Design ID: 312952323886 Estimate ID: 20937 Design & Buy' GARAG E How to purchase at the store 1. Take this packet to any Menards store. 2. Have a building materials team member enter the design number into the Garage Estimator Search Saved Designs page. 3. Apply the design to System V to create the material list. 4. Take the purchase documents to the register and pay. How to recall and purchase a saved design at home 1. Go to Menards.com. 2. Select the Garage Estimator from the Project Center. 3. Select Search Saved Design. 4. Log into your account. 5. Select the saved design to load back into the estimator. 6. Add your Garage to the cart and purchase. Estimated Price: * Today's estimated price, future pricing may go up or down. Tax, labor, and delivery not included. Floor type (concrete, dirt, gravel) is NOT included in estimated price. The floor type is used in the calculation of materials needed. Labor, foundation, steel beams, paint, electrical, heating, plumbing, and delivery are also NOT included in estimated price. This is an estimate. It is only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based on this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. FRnCE .a.z 8 ASSOCLLTES JACKSON - nur:y4--% y,�y `fir • 7$tip �ei��SLC. ;G'A�.....,. tors -- `., 250 AG. r_ V. AR. 10.1 swn,so..ro. 8 8I 11 sr•f' STATES ,c. 1° YeA � n�, �r 3 • igarOgre ryy YpY .ikY.'w 4•1 OFFICIAL PLAT imq �,,. ...... w, Wm. 11a. w, olfe. No ...norm d ,fol fdloolne 1. %. Mle I,y: 1.7. tree rreeoff Me buum.tt ...rrrwar of .aria. ap, Toonn.Mlp n ienn, ti' 10113 vK lrin• .mmly y. ��•.kr Y•ar��i��ili'K1a. �Me:wrt W �v w�ll'•ri y�m,we wiw �� =darAY�l'�,.��.r•„v Yard ueno r. . ', �,�:e ^.� s:?x b•a� . m; ....� __1"" . . ? ▪ C w: w Tro :ate :..,. ;el•,^ p.. u fpnpY try mrwl urn •tna mrn one Yw etliou .na r�wnnyytriyY i,n-n m rnlp pin M eNnre• vre/a roe ry purpt„ u ak.trarle .w WI Il...._ .pe .p. H. U N ..r their l,.r,n. n�. R e., �/ p. ea iwi .i .w .Tt. • ran i,. 3.nL nor a PLw-_- ln4 RrO 1. •. fa. w.r.`ti w cc... i.. tprr ..pl r.. S�Ciq�CY.�{�• $.'� I1S,l{v yore yusxSf.3CA.T.Y ?$ ~`\3 1i5.1 y"''H 1M,f Mnwrbn...,. f•a„.L trr 1wM j, \ �`▪ nrwl •� 7.'"•••i.ng7l N �ti iwr p I mer•LIn yre . l • q grec we .. u.: ..n...ti. — .n � a3� nn..` ° "L.:«1y.�1.7."7 � w. ::"w . Ir o . eeel a •. 5;lrr ..n.d,...Nn .,rr...a.... r.ro.r...a beforeCi.e sa .lp moor , o. _ •; l t::." IR ,I,, ,n. plot hoe been approved ,hla eo&o day raa 1 xaxe_vLeuLLWA.rrn 1 r..w. r I. ,�. a.lw.n.•. r,rr,,,wr, r.l!z, .w�wa� f of1.4 TK• Loaf! W... r w 1xw f _ y.r P. r noeac ^ Altatw e.tr>rr. r•• nwe 6rwrrvrnr. ,r.+y.1a m,,.ry, ltononte. ... a.r .r tstal.rrrr.•..ya„w•.,.utu CnAN.q[,w uT.nr uy...nT -7 �nt.NTv r.•r w..w W y Iv .Y y.Y yr_fJGiL •••• .� „!a CdUNY' RBCOROSq .gr.1, .,.n.,e, e..rly ...... oZjfifia. ln� G9`B s. 0 0 y'' \ I -- SET SPIKE AND 12,0 (-) • k LATH ON LOT LINE 9,--05.1k s ij.t • ■ -- FOUND I/2 INCH / IRON PIPE MARKED RLS17252 000,00"E S35 —, 00 I / FOUND 1/2 INCH 1 ��'- IRON PIPE MARKED RLSc1232 /-SET SPIKE AND LATH ON LOT LINE //I/ k _/ / / \ / • / / 1 4 . 1 I. t . % r / • -SET SPIKE AND LATH ON LOT LINE _ r _ — POUND 1/2 INCH IC ON PIPE MARKED RLS 18213 ram- DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER RECORD PLAT FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MARKED RL5 232 1 6p CY&o •00 L_�, -FOUND 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE 0,9 MELVILLE COURT N (72ND STREET COURT N) CERTIFICATION hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of MINNESOTA. DANIEL L. THURMES dlTte 5-25-16 License No. 2571 8 Project: JC07023A 84.54 s81o38'55w r1 ' , - • SET LATH ON LOT LINE - ■ 340, 00 t r D+ AlNAGE EASEl'7ENT APES UTILITY P♦ r • .% / . < i ,, IA / i_I SET LATH ON LOT LINE-' LEGAL DESCRIPTION RECORD PLAT • AINAGE EASEMENT 28 pO F - / / I _ ♦ / / / I SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PER UTILITY RECORD PLAT S8/o ii/ 16„p / /-FOUND 1/2 INCH / i IRON PIPE MARKED / / RL59232 ON PLAT SURVEY LINE '/N8-499•,39--- 5-16 0 r-FOUND I/2 INCH I IRON PIPE MAl21(D Ri-5g232 ON PLAT SURVEY LINE /r -- DRAINAGE EASEMENT V NORTH 50 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: BRANDON KOTVAL 71 55 MELVILLE CT. N. STILLWATER, MN 55082 AND PER UTILITY PEcoRD 100 PLAT ; cb o'\? Suite #1 6750 Stillwater Blvd. N. \ Stillwater, MN 55082 ` �, Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. SHEET 1 OF 2 Jenn Sundberg From: Dawn Kotval Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 3:09 PM To: Planning Dept Subject: Garage requst. [CAUTION] *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi my name is Dawn Kotval. I submitted a request for approval for a unattached garage that we are planning to put up this Spring.) was asked to send a explanation of the build.. We are proposing to use Our land to build a unattached garage for excess storage. Esthetically it will match the exterior of our house as noted on the plans . We are part of Jackson estate and this will have no impact on any neighboring property..thank you Dawn kotval.. i i11war THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: May 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Variance Request in RB: Two -Family District; Variance to Front Yard Setback for Addition/Remodel at 226 Harriet St N BACKGROUND The Owners of 226 Harriet St N are requesting a Variance to the Front Yard (Exterior) Setback in order to construct carport. For purposes of this review, a carport is essentially a detached accessory structures with a roof but no walls. The Applicant's submittal provides additional detail. The underlying zoning district is the RB: Two -Family Residential District. The site is also located in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The required front yard setback for this improvement is 20 feet. The Owner is proposing an approximate 2 foot setback. ANALYSIS State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. When considering this Variance request, it is important to also consider the Design Guideline requirements for the Neighborhood Conservation District. Of key importance, said Design Guidelines do not allow a site to have garages as the dominant feature. Garages are directed to be even with or behind the front of the house; tuck under garages are acceptable. Appropriate: Recessed garage is minimized, emphasizing house facade and street frontage. Other pertinent guidelines include, but are not necessarily limited to the following. • Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties • Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood • Preserve significant trees • Locate the garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns • Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front • Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building • Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture, where the building's style, design and detail are consistent on all sides, not just the front facade The Applicant has stated that they are asking for this Variance to construct this carport in order to avoid installing a temporary membrane structure. Staff would like to spend a bit of time looking at the plain language of City Code to better understand if these types of temporary structures are truly permitted by Code. While the circumstances may be unique to the Property, Staff needs further policy direction from the Planning Commission as to whether the Commission feels the request is reasonable and whether the Variance would alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The request does appear to be due to the physical characteristics of the site and are not due to economic considerations alone. Finally, the City has received letters of objections from area neighbors. Said letters are attached for review. RECOMMENDATION Staff is open to the request with specific Planning Commission direction, but is struggling to justify the current request without appropriate Planning Commission policy - direction per guidance found in Zoning Code and the Stillwater Design Guideline Manual. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve/deny the Variance to Front Yard Setback for a Car Port at 226 Harriet St N. 11111 ,•�1[�j�t Y . 37: . ' 4 41 I lwater i ; 4. i , / '4. •!!,, ?'rA k. — � ; I "�* ��' 4 cs i � t �M1 �i If I� - I"1'.IJI,��I�., I II a 111�l:l0L Ii idr I ' i The Birthplace of Minnesota N 4*� +G yip ��\ wa d ,, •. 1p. \may` "1 /; -r: �' .,e•�w1. W IA� STREET iv .�. ' i • of1 r��'� �` • a. .,, r'}4�,-, , , "'. `` .'`� : '4 �,. 4' ; 'p' hi Site Location 226 Harriet St N 0 45 90 180 Feet i L 1 1 General Site Location ;t ra Ni a„ r ... $ : !:r•+ Lr t I■ t\`r Ir 1_ +�' 1 ‘-, . -. .. t .' �k. jc ! mFlaiggli I�I,, I �lll �������► 311 a. t !,c 5a . a�,. 'Y .,, li r"=�-'T, ..I III' lr '11. • -- q ; - � i.ti 1 � , ,ram-i J' n im� NAM ®®®® :�`�.r ? fit. k kW _ }* � _I . , M. j 1 .`fir +•z ;: r ,..,,� Imo„!.in by +:r:=I11"=1--; �iii� Irir.nc „Earn. ��Aill r �■. mii-���IIL� I!!! [ liwater Planning Department PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Commission ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit XVariance Resubdivision* Subdivision* Lot Line Adjustment* Please read carefully: 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.tnn.us PlanningDeptg,ci.stillwater.mn.us Case No. Base Fee: Date Filed: + County Recording fee Receipt No.: $50 per document + Tech Fee: $25.00 Total Fees: Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney, engineering fees and recording fees. • Only one copy of supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and in pdf format. • Review the `Checklist to the Planning Administration Application Form' for the complete list of required items that must be submitted. Any incomplete application or supporting material will cause your application to be rejected by the City. • Applications will be rejected without a legal description. A legal description is found on the deed to the property. Attach as an exhibit if necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project 22.10 1AU to T - �, 0 Assessor's Parcel No. �S3C 2 1� " �j " C0Z9 (PIN Number) Complete Property Legal Description Thom -,coy, RA 1ZKY R. PrYIb IAD UJe.'.S 2n j WiD. L-b T 5 1D( - Z Zoning DistrictR.bDescription of Project CQf, PoRT s Ir.!e��cPc-,-�. Cl5P1�J2.�Sj0rYCT 1ZZ► Si ,ct le 'amt4 kJnte itlCv---vCtaC04ecar- too . u. 5 a-s-- ► >; ► tc .,.. utce of f s-1-; r q -1--u.ac 1 oAd e,r : orJLcctct Q e. , r +l%1 s i co op (► i c l-o lve c- is _ �O(,ITH S1t?2 i�y 6i Th.ere rove C�it'Itof SeCT»'tc (%2�1tck " 9a r4.9L OF Peem cme.iT Ca( fD t T 1UpuLD nc)Lue This 1(1)b l-efl , Comet stcuerf2dl i 9s lIioy t-eiip (/r Pv4T 3u- - l/ , l From Ci ry, 11ese 1{Jl /J PrDbabIy res-Eric i) 4ea r-Fcc re.Con-I I LOkei :1---14/i4tt-ed 16411 cf ittat 16(mbaelf_a&cE dool 4P a 1=. tava Aa 4'� S �`��D �r Con �gunp � Via ✓hc� -E�. Socciti c ith �uAu� cl�OD1. I •� 9 -/iLo A2_ao01cg_ , a � 'Mid d-6 (-. -JuQQ �a�t Ourtialf..Oo owlAiC. 6vl� v� � e MA k_ auk q ik Aatr+1 s40to 4 sue, 14 S13 MUUSERRY srw 05/30/2020 226 Harriet Street North SS7 HUISERRY, STOY ' RERRY ,Obfri SSS,MULSf_Rv: Si W, 12:10 AA Mary K. JCTOITC sulS• La ers Tools Login ;amavision.com s0u.-r4 G 4,eq-62 bbO e. PLAN VIEW 2X8 FRAMING 2X4 UNDER LAY FOR TIM ROOF TIN ROOFING 12 11)'-03„ GRADE 1 0'-6" ELEVATION VIEW (3►•2X12. BROWN TREATEDHEAI GALV BEAM TO POST ANCHOR (3 6X6 BROWN TREATED POSTS GALV POST ANCHOR ANCHOR. 6" EMBEDMENT FROST FOOTINGS MINIMUM 42" BELOW GRADE cSealfrOa 53ce)Z4 04,/, Oat-,4.c. aooa-9 yitp A aLk�� Sv� ti� G'`'�G" aa keAt, e iVe,c.e 5ariaj g.212 Cry ,f1,02/ Liitej 440 aez,7494±/611(i--&_itA,,- e,ec,a. sktiet 47'�� a=d va‹e-ge z� xt,, a4,y0e-d, dIre, _s 6.E c1 C 1-1 .mee U/la, M /ti � ��. Re: Case #CD 2022-29 226 Harriet St. North Mary K. Jerome Dear Planning Commission; May 19, 2022 This letter is directed to the Planning Commission; to address our concerns about our neighbor's request to construct a "carport" in front of their residents at 226 Harriet Street, North, at the May 25th meeting. We, Erik and Kathleen Skon, live across the street (30 years) at 233 Harriet Street North and have reviewed the application of Mary K. Jerome. We are objecting and are questioning the purpose and need of the construction of a "carport". 1) The owners recently purchased an Airstream trailer; which is stored in front and on the south side of their property (location of proposed "carport"). If you review the proposed constructed height, you will understand that the intended use of this "carport" is for trailer storage. This trailer is used for recreational purposes and could be placed in/or at a storage facility, when not in use (off site) or at it's current location. 2) The owners have stated in their variance, that they need to construct a "carport" because they cannot put their vehicles in the garage, due to clearance issues. This is NOT TRUE. They have chosen to purchase somewhat larger vehicles (pickup trucks) and could have chosen to purchase smaller vehicles. We have seen both of their current vehicles enter the existing garage spaces/stalls. Mary Jerome has said that she wanted to construct a shelter for the Airstream with no mention of a "carport or car shelter" in prior conversations. We disagree/reject this variance request on the basis that it is unnecessary. As stated, other options are available to the owners ie. the purchase of smaller vehicles and off site storage of their Airstream trailer. MOST IMPORTANT: the addition of a structure would be an unsightly distraction for us and surrounding neighbors. We value our neighbors and neighborhood. We want to keep our area well maintained, with curbside appeal. Therefore, we OPPOSE the passage of this variance request. Sincerely, Erik and Kathy Skon We are available for any further questions and will be present at the May 25th meeting. ctte/ki 374146e-i_4‘) 1041 5-3-O �t-c40 ea.o_L ylo. a -a? P.ro *,.280362.63/06z`� Vu2.6.4 a/n-) y„,0,4) C 62,, MAr- d .Zteef //iiaatOd }Awe_ 6/14a7 u70/)&0(tao4„/Ly049r-t"2 2 z z4 /1�4 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA DATE: May 20, 2022 TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commissioners FROM: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Variance Request in RB: Two -Family District; Variance to Side Yard (Exterior) Setback for Addition/Remodel at 1204 4th Ave S BACKGROUND The Owners of 1204 4th Ave S are requesting a Variance to the Side Yard (Exterior) Setback in order to construct an addition. The project would also include the demolition of an existing deck and detached garage. The underlying zoning district is the RB: Two -Family Residential District. The site is also located in the Neighborhood Conservation District. The required side yard (corner) setback for this improvement is 20 feet. The Owner isproposing an 8 foot, 10 % inch setback. ANALYSIS State Statute Chapter 462.357 requires that cities consider the following standards when considering a Variance. This is also known as the `practical difficulty' test. • The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. • The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. • The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The proposed addition to the existing home appears to be a reasonable use and is consistent with the requirements of the Stillwater Design Guidelines for the Neighborhood Conservation District. The circumstances are unique to the property in that this generally historic neighborhood pre -dates current zoning regulations pertaining to side yard (corner) setbacks. The detached accessory building/garage already includes this same condition; the approved remodel simply carries that same setback (albeit in a different location) and replaces it with a higher -quality structure. The Owner is also matching the existing setback of the primary dwelling. The Variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; in fact, the proposed improvement will arguably improve the character of the neighborhood through accepted neighborhood design elements. Finally, the difficulties are not economic considerations alone. The Owner has gone through great lengths to design an addition that meet applicable design guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Planning Commission approve the request. ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Variance to Side Yard (Exterior) Setback for an addition at 1204 4th Ave S. BURLINGT'i N STREET J w% . .._ 0 The Birthplace of Minnesota 1204 4th Ave S 70 140 280 Feet Pasque Architecture TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF STILLWATER: 1204 4th Ave. s. VARIANCE APPLICATION Micheal and Nicole Willenbring - homeowners of the residence at 1204 4th Ave. S. - are requesting a variance for a proposed attached garage addition (26' x 26') with a second floor. The proposed addition is requested to align with the North (Burlington St. E. Side) setback of the existing mudroom. The mudroom received a variance (circa 2o15) for an 8'-io 3 " setback from the North Property Line. The original 188o's residence has an 8'-81/2" setback from the North Property Line. The 3 1/4" step back of the existing mudroom promotes the hierarchy of the 188o's residence. The proposed work maintains the character of the existing property and surrounding neighborhood in scale, style, and detailing — while updating the home for a family of five. Practical Difficulties and Proposed Work The existing detached garage is 1.1' from West (rear) property line and 8.4' from North (side) property line. In other words, the existing detached garage is close to the rear and side property lines and very far from the existing residence. The garage is undersized forthe homeowner's needs (z cars, yard equipment, bikes, etc.). The homeowners have a family of five and the current home only has 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms (1 bathroom is off of the first -floor mudroom which is inconveniently far from the bedrooms on the second floor). The homeowner purchased this property with an appreciation for the historic character and large side yard. They would like to maintain as many old growth trees as possible. Alternatives for relocating the garage were considered, but would have divided the side yard or required changing the curb cut or removing additional old growth trees. The proposed work includes demolishing the detached garage and 2 trees. Please see the attached Drawing Set for a description of work. In summary, the proposed attached garage and second story addition will improve the following: • Increase the garage setback from the North (Burlington St. E. Side) property line (from 8'-4 3 "to 8'— io 3 ") • Increase the garage setback from West (rear) neighboring property (from i'-11/" to 42'-o") • Maintain the existing curb cut and driveway connection to Burlington St. E. • Reorient garage doors off of street and provide windows along North (Burlington St. E. Side) Elevation • Provide an attached two -car garage with a connection through the existing mudroom • Transition from a 3 bedroom, 2 bath to a 4 bedroom, 2.5 bath for the homeowners and their3 children Aligning Intent The property at 1204 4th Ave. 5. received a variance (around 2015) to remodel the existing mudroom. In this variance, the previous homeowner was allowed to setback the exterior wall of the mudroom 31/"from the exterior of the 188o's residence. This resulted in an 8'-io 3 " setback from the North (Burlington St. E. Side) property line. The current homeowners request the same 8'-io 3 " setback from the North (Burlington St. E. Side) property line for a proposed two-story addition. This will allow the addition to connect with the existing mudroom and utilize the existing door to enter the residence from an attached garage. From the exterior, the proposed addition will align with the mudroom and provide the same 31/" setback from the a88o's residence. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan The homeowner is conscientious of the historic character of the surrounding neighborhood homes, many of which have undergone additions and renovations to meet the contemporary needs. The proposed addition at 1204 4th Ave. S. will match the exterior style of original 188o's Italianate residence. The massing and exterior materials will match the painted wood lap siding and trim details of the existing residence. Aesthetically, the addition pairs well with the original four -square but has a slightly smaller footprint to maintain the hierarchy of the original residence. The street side windows will have similar proportions and be double hung with 2 over 2 sashes. The west end of the two-story addition steps back for a porch with an Italianate railing. The proposed work follows the impervious paving requirements (maximum of 30% of a lot may be impervious). The homeowner will maintain the remaining trees onsite. The proposed additional will maintain the character ofthis lot with a seamless integration with the existing home's style and floor plan. Please reach out with additional questions about the proposed work. Kind Regards Katie Kangas, AIA, MN Archit of Pasque Architecture, LLC (On behalf of Homeowners, Michael & Nicole Willenbring) Pasque Architecture, LLC Page i of Printed 4/22/2o22 0 NORTHWEST PERSPECTIVE OF PROPOSED ADDITION EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TEAM OWNER: ARCHITECT: 4/22/2022 12:40:58 P NICOLE & MICHAEL WILLENBRING 1204 4TH AVE. S STILLWATER, MN 55082 PASQUE ARCHITECTURE, LLC KATIE KANGAS, AIA 5592 SCHUTTA ROAD SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 PROJECT NAME: SOUTH HILL ADDITION ADDRESS: 1204 4TH AVE. S. , STILLWATER, MN 55082 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REQUESTING VARIANCE TO ALIGN EXTERIOR OF PROPOSED TWO-STORY ADDITION WITH EXISTING MUDROOM (WHICH RECEIVED A VARIANCE IN 2015). PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES: DEMO OF DETACHED GARAGE AND 2 TREES. PROPOSED TWO-STORY ADDITION INCLUDES ATTACHED GARAGE TO THE WEST SIDE (REAR) OF THE EXISTING HOME. PROPOSING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TO REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT. DRIVEWAY TO CONNECT WITH EXISTING CURB CUTS FROM BURLINGTON STREET EAST. CURRENT RESIDENCE HAS 3 BEDROOMS AND 2 BATHS. AFTER THE PROPOSED ADDITION IS INSTALLED, THE RESIDENCE WILL HAVE A TOTAL OF 4 BEDROOMS AND 2.5 BATHS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: HERSEY STAPLES AND CO'S ADD TO STILLWATER Lot 1 & 2, Block 8, SubdivisionCd 09850 ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION: PREVIOUS ADDITIONS / VARIANCE: PARCEL NUMBER: IMPERVIOUS AREA: EXISTING: TOTAL PROPOSED: TOTAL LOT: RESIDENCE 1,161 SF 1,761 SF 13,410 SF ELEVATION OF RESIDENCE: TOTAL EXISTING ELEVATION: TOTAL PROPOSED ELEVATION: 1880 2015 34.030.20.23.0030 PAVING/GARAGE TOTAL 2,006 SF 3,167 SF 2,240 SF 4,001 SF 29.8% IMPERVIOUS (30% MAX) 2,170 SF (350 SF TO BE DEMO'D) 16% DEMO OF ELEVATIONS 3,151 SF 1 IIIII 1 IIIIIIIIII III11 IIIII_I 11 II II III�I IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIII Ill IIII I� I I OLOCATION MAP NTS II ��W�IIline III IIII III IIII PROJECT LOCATION (1204 4TH AVE. S.) NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION KATIE KANGAS, AIA © Pasque Architecture LLC 12044TH AVE. S., STILLWATER, MN 55082 PROJECT INFORMATION . & M. Willenbring C:\Users\ktkng\Documents\Active Projects_KK\22005_South Hill Addition_KK\Revit\22005_South Hill Addition_A21.rvt CL ODEMO EXIST. GARAGE NTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS SHOWN ON WARRANTY DEED DOC. NO. 4266027) Lots 1 and 2, Block 8, Hersey, Staples and Co's Addition to Stillwater, Washington County, Minnesota EASEMENT NOTES: 1. NO TITLE COMMITMENT OR TIRE OPINION WAS PROVIDED TO US THAT WOULD SHOW EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES EFFECTING THE PROPERTY SURVEYED. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. AREA TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 13,410 SQ.FT. SURVEY NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER VISUAL OBSERVATION AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF STILLWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. DATE OF FIELD TOPOGRAPHY 3-24-2022. EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: HOUSE =1161 (IN SQUARE FEET) GARAGE =586 DECKS = 360 DRIVEWAY =158 CONCRETE =377 PATIO = 252 TOTAL IMPROVEMENTS = 2894 SQ.FT.- 21.6% (%OF OHW AREA) LEGEND: • roomEMTE CONNscrm O n t? N © or p .. e^r.Wm„ ® O ▪ ELIOVC m0 - 40 M 1011. SOX • roma POLE -0 ",w»00(04 00 O+ +Cn.,�m a Urnr.,0N., CO.( (.Dmran 0.001.004 O0.= • STOW INUMyk' a Doom,00 O nA100 (No gen.. ® MOMM.NND0 SURVEY INFO 000(00.0,00 CAM TV Cum MK. 000111101.0.01100( NTS WILLENBERG RESIDENCE CONTACT Brian Posch Posch Builders LLC 651.269.2021 COUNTY/CITY: WAS HI N GTO NJ COUNTY I TY O STI LLWA I I REVISIONS DATE REVISION 3-24-2002 PRELIMINARY ISSUE CERTIFICATION: cenIfy that this Plan was taWnnmydirettendsowanhra,sthe laws othe state or Minnesota, Dad g snatbn Npmbar, 25718 PROJECT LOCATION: 4TH AVE_ S. PID#3403020230030 Suite 8200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan®cssurvey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. PILE NAME SU2285A PROPROJECTZZ1 NO. ZZ12285A CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY » » > X 859.7 > OU 859.0-- X 859.5 > 0� 2 9.0 SET SPIKE 2.00"-1 FEET SOUTH OF LOT CORNER. FALLS IN TREE DEMO EXIST. GARAGE AND ASPHALT DRIVEWAY (790 SF IMPERVIOUS) i" ✓', 857.6- 11 26" DEMOLITION SITE PLAN 0 X 858.3 > BITUMINOUS SURFACE » » BURLINGTON ST. 856.3- X 856.8 > J 858.0 FLOOR =858.05 GARAGE - -857.5 -857.5 n 16"DBL -857.0 856.9 1" = 20'-011 s?e 858.0 DEMO 2 TREES X 857.5 DEMO SIDEWALK Nh X857.7 62, 20"TRPL X857.2 18"DBL DEMO EXIST. DECK 16" AND SIDEWALK 4" (400 SF IMPERVIOUS) X856.1 856.3 X856.I 856.3 z/ 55" 856.4X 856.6- X8 6.1 X855.9 X 855.8 X856.0 CO 4856.7 855.6-- X 856.3 855.9-- 20" X 855.4 28'I 855.6-\ MB 9 56.0 11.2 - X 855.8 X857.2 08^ 6 -FLOOR =858.03 E -857.1 ISTING HOUSE l////////A 856.6 DECK Ia X 856.2 X856.1 6.0 X 855.6 X855.3 855,5 v 55.3 855.6 132.99 S89°5621"W (132.00 PLAT) z55.8 / EXISTING HOUSE X855.6 855.9 40' 855.3 NORTH 0 OU > 854.1 - --854.5 OU X 854.5 A A A A A A A A A A »I- 10' 20' 40' SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION -2 DEMO SITE PLAN © Pasque Architecture LLC & M. Willenbring N ¢1 0 0 a Y 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Lei VI N w O v C E u 0 0 i.i 4/22/2022 12:41:10 P - » > X 859.7 > b 0h PROPERTY LINE ou X 859.5 859 0,4k2 59.0 SET SPIKE 2.00"-1 FEET SOUTH OF LOT CORNER. FALLS IN TREE 1,520 SF PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PROPOSED BASKETBALL HOOP yj 252 SF EXIST. PATIO 857.6- 26" 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1" = 20'-0" 6 16"DBL r856.9 / X858.3 > 'PROPO$ED.REA1 SET$AGK 16 4 X856.1 8"DBL 856. 56.1 BITUMINOUS SURFACE » » URL/NGTON ST. ou ou (132.00 PLAT) xa57.2 o N89°56'21"E E mh 132.49 857.0 - 857.0 3 X556.1 / \• 856.3 .,/ \\ \'9 4' 6---3`4 T ' --j<855.8 i X 856.8 > 0 SF SIDEWALK 55" \ // 856.4X 856.6- X 855.9 PRINT) X 856.0 w tti 0 25" 11'- EXIST. x555.I 1/2" ETBACK 82 SF E IST. W JOD POR X 855.8 1,161 SF (FOOTP EXIS CC 856.7 NT) NG RESIDENCE 228 SF WOOD DECK X 856.2 X856.1 56.0 X 855.6 X 855.3 X 856.3 855.9-- TOTAL LOT: 13,410 SF 855.6-- 20" X 855.4 8555 v 55.3 855.6 132. 49 S89°56 ' 21" W05855.8 XS 6.1 X855.8 (132.00 PLAT) > 5.8 555.9 132'-6"�������/A/��������������������� X 855.6 40 855.3 -855.2 854.4 Ou -854.5 OU X 854.5 6_ :1\ A A A A A A A > SITE PLAN LEGEND NORTH EXISTING RESIDENCE (1,161 SF) PROPOSED ADDITION (676 SF) EXISTING PAVING TO REMAIN (272 SF) PROPOSED PAVING (1,660 SF) EXISTING DECK / PORCH (310 SF) 10' 20' 40' -3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 21-6 C:\Users\ktkng\Documents\Active Projects_KK\22005_South Hill Addition_KK\Revit\22005_South Hill Addition_A21.rvt PROPOSED DRIVEWAY a . ° MAIN LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0" -7-1UPPER LEVEL 1/8" = 1'-0" 26' - 0" PROPOSED ATTACHED GARAGE PROPOSED ATTACHED TWO -CAR GARAGE PROPOSED ,SIDEWALK L J REPLACE EXIST. DECK IN SIZE & KIND (WOOD) 2/-6 46' - 3 1/2" EXISTING RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION ,3' - 61 /4" 23' - 0" EXISTING RESIDENCE REMOVE ONE EXIST. WINDOW (CONFLICTS WITH EXIST. ROOF) 41-6 28' -1 3/4" EXISTING RESIDENCE 7' - 0" REPLACE EXIST. PORCH IN SIZE & KIND - (WOOD) 1= �e EXIST. SIDEWALK o ' 2'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION -4 FLOOR PLANS © Pasque Architecture LLC . & M. Willenbring N a1 0 x L J O 0' 0 0 N c K 0 O 0 0 S L 0 O N 0 0 O N/ Y Y u W v N E 0 O 0 0 C SC 0) 4/22/2022 12:41:24 P ELEVATION - EAST NTS ELEVATION - WEST NTS ELEVATION - NORTH NTS ELEVATION - SOUTH NTS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION KATIE KANGAS, AIA EXISTING ELEVATIONS C Pasque Architecture LLC 12044TH AVE. S., STILLWATER, MN 55082 . & M. Willenbring C:\Users\ktkng\Documents\Active Projects_KK\22005_South Hill Addition_KK\Revit\22005_South Hill Addition_A21.rvt 4/22/2022 12:41:29 PM 1 0o�Wwuwu O101�W�ooOo L uuuuuu 'AR III III III REPLACE FRONT PORCH IN SIZE & KIND OEAST ELEVATION (4TH AVE S. - FRONT) 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED DECK WITH ITALIANATE DETAILING 000000 0 00 < " 0000 OOOOOOIi1111I11100E100 0000 - 00000 0 HOO M000EMI NWM0000 00 i PROPOSED ATTACHED GARAGE ADDITION WEST ELEVATION (REAR YARD) 1/8" = J NEW WINDOWS TO MATCH EXISTING DOUBLE HUNG IN STYLE & PROPORTION MATCH EXIST. BRACKETS & ITALIANATE TRIM DETAILS MATCH EXISTING RESIDENCE MATERIALS: WOOD LAP SIDING, TRIM, AND ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF ONORTH ELEVATION (BURLINGTON ST. E - SIDE) 1/8" = 1'-0" vuqr uuluul muulu uuuu uuI uU nuO I O I I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 ■ uuuuul 0000100000100HMINM 0` U' 26' - 7 3/4" PROPOSED ATTACHED GARAGE ADDITION OSOUTH ELEVATION (SIDE YARD) 1/8" = 1-0" 45' - 9 1/4" EXISTING RESIDENCE REPLACE / ADD WINDOWS MATCH STYLE OF SOUTH ELEVATION WINDOWS (COLONIAL DOUBLE HUNG AND CASEMENTS) EXISTING RESIDENCE 26'-71/2" TWO STORY ATTACHED GARAGE ADDITION I(0 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuu LEM= ' 2'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0" ELEVATIONS C:\Users\ktkng\Documents\Active Projects_KK\22005_South Hill Addition_KK\Revit\22005_South Hill Addition_A21.rvt 4/22/2022 12:41:45 PM NORTHEAST CORNER SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED ADDITION EXIST. MUDROOM SETBACK EXIST. RESIDENCE EXIST. RESIDENCE PROPOSED ADDITION TO ALIGN WITH EXIST. MUDROOM SETBACK 11_ 11I I. 'II,I.111411I,i�I, fi it SOUTH HILL ADDITION VARIANCE APPLICATION -7 3D VIEWS © Pasque Architecture LLC & M. Willenbring Ulwater THE BIRTH P L A C E OF MINNESOTA PLANNING REPORT TO: MEETING DATE: APPLICANT: LANDOWNER: REQUEST: LOCATION: DISTRICT: REPORT BY: Planning Commission CASE NO.: CD 2022-33 May 25, 2022 Noelle Singerhouse Noelle Singerhouse Consideration of structural impervious surface maximum Variance for a deck. 3671 Summit Lane RB—Two Family Residential District Frannie Nielsen, Interim Zoning Administrator INTRODUCTION Noelle Singerhouse owns the property at 3671 Summit Ln and is requesting consideration of a Variance to allow structural impervious surface coverage over 25% as limited by the RB—Two Family Residential zoning district. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow 27% structural coverage to permit the construction of at 16.5' x 20' deck. The property is well under the 25% maximum "other" impervious surface coverage at 8%. The property has the potential to add 1,630 square feet of other impervious surface coverage and only 166 square feet of structural impervious surface coverage. SPECIFIC REQUEST Consideration of the following variance: 1. A variance to Section 31-308. - RB two-family district to increase the maximum allowed structural coverage from 25% to 27%. ANALYSIS The State of Minnesota enables a City to grant variances when they meet the review criteria below. 1. No variance may be granted that would allow any use that is prohibited in the zoning district in which the subject property is located. CD 2022-33 May 25, 2022 Page 2 The property is zoned RB—Two Family residential district. The existing and proposed uses are compatible in the RB zoning district. 2. The variance must be in harmony with the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. • What is the purpose of the regulation for which the variance is being requested? The purpose of a maximum structural impervious surface coverage is to create uniform development within the zoning district and maintain adequate stormwater management. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Zoning Code? The proposed variance to lot coverage would not be out of harmony with the Zoning Code. City staff approved plans for a home construction with a structural impervious surface coverage of 23% without a deck. The use of the deck and the minimal increase to structural impervious surface coverage is not out of harmony with the zoning code. • If granted, would the proposed variance be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan? A goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to maintain and improve Stillwater's existing housing stock. The proposed variance to lot coverage would act as an improvement to the existing housing. The proposed variances would not be out of harmony with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are "practical difficulties" in complying with the Zoning Code. A practical difficulty means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Code; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a "practical difficulty". • Is the property proposed to be used in a reasonable manner? The applicants are proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; decks are an allowed use in the RB zoning district. 16.5' x 20' is a reasonable deck size. The proposed deck meets zoning setback standards. • Is the plight of the landowner due to circumstances unique to the property? The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property. The applicants are limited to 2,404 square feet of structural coverage on their 9,616 square foot lot. The property currently has 2,238 square feet of structural coverage and therefore only 166 square feet of additional structural coverage is permitted. The property is unique as the structural coverage is almost at the maximum 25% structural coverage but only has 8% other impervious coverage. CD 2022-33 May 25, 2022 Page 3 • Are the circumstances created by the landowner? The property owner did not create these circumstances. City Staff approved the structural impervious surface coverage of 23% without considering the potential for a deck in the rear of the property. City Staff created unique circumstances for the applicant by approving structural impervious surface coverage of 23%. • If granted, would the variances alter the essential character of the locality? The proposed variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed and existing uses are permitted in the RB zoning district. This property is not subject to additional design standards or design review. • Have practical difficulties been established independent of economic considerations? The applicant's desire for the variances is due to factors apart economic considerations. The variance request is due to previous approvals rather than economic considerations. The cost of the deck would remain consistent with or without the granting of a variance. ALTERNATIVES A. Approval. If the Planning Commission finds the request in conformance to the City Code requirements for the issuance of a variance, it could approve the variance with (at least) the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to those found on file with Case CD 2022-33, except as modified by the conditions herein. 2. All changes to the approved plans will need to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director in advance. Any major changes will need to the Planning Commission for Use Permit amendment review and approval. 3. Lot coverage in excess of the 25% allowed shall meet Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization's infiltration requirements. B. Table. If the Planning Commission finds the request to have insufficient information, the case could be tabled. C. Denial. If the Planning Commission finds the request to be inconsistent with City Code, it could be denied. With a denial, the basis of the action should be given. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION The property's condition is not a result of the applicant and is quite unique. The proposed improvement is not inconsistent with the neighborhood it is situated in. The property owner has made a reasonable request to construct a deck to enjoy their property. The applicants have shown that the proposed improvement generally conforms to the intent of the Zoning Code. CD 2022-33 May 25, 2022 Page 4 Given these findings, staff finds that — with reasonable conditions — the request conforms to the standards set forth for the issuance of a variance and recommends approval of the variances with conditions outlined in Alternative A, above. Attachments: Site Location Map Variance Application Deck Plans Applicant Narrative Lot Coverage Worksheet cc: Noelle Singerhouse SUMMIT LANE iliwater Planning Department .1 PLANNING APPLICATION Planning Commission ACTION REQUESTED Special/Conditional Use Permit Variance Resubdivision* Subdivision* Lot Line Adjustment* Please read carefully: 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us PlanningDept@ci.stillwater.mn.us Case No. Base Fee: Date Filed: + County Recording fee Receipt No.: $50 per document + Tech Fee: $25.00 Total Fees: Comprehensive Plan Amendment* Zoning Amendment* Planning Unit Development * Certificate of Compliance *An escrow fee is also required to offset the costs of attorney, engineering fees and recording fees. • Only one copy of supporting materials is required. However, any documents larger than 11 x 17 must be submitted in paper and in pdf format. • Review the `Checklist to the Planning Administration Application Form' for the complete list of required items that must be submitted. Any incomplete application or supporting material will cause your application to be rejected by the City. • Applications will be rejected without a legal description. A legal description is found on the deed to the property. Attach as an exhibit if necessary. After Planning Commission approvals, there is a 10-day appeal period. Once the 10-day appeal period has ended, the applicant will receive a zoning use permit which must be signed and submitted to the City to obtain the required building permits. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION Address of Project Assessor's Parcel No. (PIN Number) Complete Property Legal Description Zoning District Description of Project 216 4th Street North Stillwater MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us PlanningDept@ci.stillwater.mn.us APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DISCLOSURE Please check each box to indicate you agree to the following statements: ❑ I understand that all information submitted for this application is subject to the Data Practices Act and that all data is presumed public data and can be made available to the public. ❑ I understand the City has the ultimate authority to determine what may be considered non-public data. ❑ I hereby state the foregoing statements and all data, information and evidence submitted herewith in, is to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. ❑ I hereby state I will comply with the permit if it is granted and used. Minn. Stat. § 13.37 allows certain data to be considered non-public data because it contains a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process (1) that was supplied by me or an organization contracted by me, (2) that is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy, and (3) that derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. Please list any materials you believe meet the criteria above and are therefore non-public data. By signing I agree to the statements above. By signing I agree to the statements above. Required Required (If other than property owner) Property Owner Representative Mailing Address Mailing Address City - State — Zip City - State — Zip Telephone No. Telephone No. Email Email Signature Signature (Signature is required) May 2021 x 918.4 X 918.5 0 X 918.7 0 x 915.0 X 914.6 IX 919.0 n co 0) x 91 I x 114.7 X 915.7 (915.1) 9151 35 31,1* x 914.6 x97k.0 35 9137 (91.3.7) X 913.4 Lot area =9616 SF House area =2088 SF Porch area =150 SF Sidewalk area =28 SF Driveway area =746 SF Total Impervious Area =3012 SF Impervious Coverage =31.3% N CO m X 918.1 N89°56'38"E X917,4 V con X 918.1 916.84 (915 9)/ Benchmark X 916.7 X 916.5 to G'I 57.5 4' X 915.2 4 X 915.9 'ax co X916.0 (910) N 89 °56' 38"E X 915.9 916.1 /24.08 X 916.1 49.50 X 921.9 X 920.6 137.64 x 921.° HP 921.41 (923.0)/ Benchmark - 30.50 n .• , e2t.s�,p 923.67 bm X 921.1 95.83 s1.5 25.51 - 10 ` 1.7 9217 921.6 301 921.I 9zI4 /_! ;;i- /////d�-�Ltjam4 /5.25 alloJII9222 .`I QO 921.7 X99CV l \I" 30.5 1I--- \1 10l0 922.0 1U 0J'7 10 Ikti � \ \ \\) CD'l921 9159 922499220 • .21.6 9 .. 916.18 49.50 (92 .5)"\ Benchmark 137.11 HP (924.0) X 916.3 X 916.1 r - 1 1 u l s^p \1N , P House d Sty Ili I • Denotes iron pipe 4(71" Denotes service nO Denotes television box • Denotes electric box O Denotes telephone box X 000.00 Denotes existing elevation ( 000,00 ) Denotes proposed elevation Denotes drainage flow direction • Denotes spike Construction Notes: 1. Install rock construction entrance. 2. Install silt fence as needed for erosion control. 3. Sidewalks shall drain away from house a minimum of 1.0%. 4. Contractor must verify driveway design. 5. Contractor must verify service elevation prior to construction. 6. Add or remove foundation ledge as required. General Notes: 1. Grading plan by Stevens last dated 6/2/16 was used to determine proposed elevotions shown herein. 2. This survey does not purport to show improvements or encroachments, except as shown, as surveyed by me or under my direct supervision. 3. Proposed building dimensions shown are for horizontal location of structures on the lot only. Contact builder prior to construction for approved construction pions. 4. No specific soils investigation has been performed on this lot by the surveyor. The suitability of soils to support the specific house proposed is not the responsibility of the surveyor. 5. This certificate does not purport to show easements other than those shown on the recorded plat. 6. Bearings shown are based on on assumed datum. PI$NEERengineering, RA.RA. 2422 Enterprise Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Ph.: (651) 681-1914 Fax: (651) 681-9488 www.ptoneereng.com `Project;.'-:117206007 \Folder#.8122IDrawnby:MTW HD=3.6' w sw 4/16/18 921.87 Benchmark X 922.2 CJ co" : Lowest floor elevation per grading plan :916.0 House elevotions (Proposed) / As -built Lowest Floor Elevation :(916.9) / Top 0f Foundation Elev. :(925.8) / Garage Slab Elev. ® Door :(9249) / 22 We hereby certify to CalAlantic Homes that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota, dated 04/09/18. Signed: /y?fopeer Engineering, P.A. BY: Peter J. Hawkinson, professional Land urveyor Minnesota License No. 42299 email-phawkinson®pioneereng,com Lot 4, Block 1, RUTHERFORD STATION SECOND ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof Washington County, Minnesota Address: 3671 Summit Lane, Stillwater, Minnesota House Model: Huntington Elevation: B Buyer: Singerhouse 9220 0' 10' 20' Scale: 1" = 20' Benchmark: Tap Nut Hydrant Lots 3-4 Block 1 Elevation = 923.67 Revisions: I.) 04-I0.18 Stake house 2.) 04-13-18 Raise house 0.9 R. Certificate of Survey for: CalAtlantic Homes 7599 Anagram Dr Eden Prairie, MN 55344-7399 Phone; (952)229-6000/Fax:(952)229-6024 4,-0„ 2,_6,„ N:w,AI STaeal ti 1 3 E Q TK EARS cEi2 - -it 6ur1M1r LN- r A Ct X a a — o- r -4 3 N a N t7 ) 0 m m tk , N P -- _.a N N �� d to X 'b ia- J Vt to n0 ►{ I- D f LCCY2 1R -t Lry ( • P L/4N , 0 F-�M � o Gar t 0 N, fa �10 'Poor 1 N C, LAB{ pllT 2 Q r- N' r- r M ° o H 1 d r • I !H 0 :0 10 iA ir 19- E Q RISERS 2 4 MP.Pt5E % 7 ° • o d • G• O b ' D 7 b ' b e b od a. 1- a. • ° 1- + • ° • _• b. + 4_oU ad+c4.19 G3 Z?4 S1 IQtoEielrt-c 3 Lei S t 10'-0" 1 fM t De.,/ 09,355 S. CJTI 0 N b N pa 1 Pe x 5Uy' PP OcYT ALL rr 31-el cUMr.-ttrt- L.NJ r. • ?Urn_ Summir sT—,a to M1NC. I o25r o2XID --r2 5yP `D fC r_ I /Is tliN 6' 5A Cor41Pas. x 'DEC-K-i $ 1 /y'' J A.G 5c e 3 (GA v prry rtEt 13'' O C. 5F r16' 2 )c l D-_ ?J lL _Css'ssr 12 �sT {�1rNGF(� f��r Singerhouse Deck Variance 3671 Summit Ln. Stillwater, MN 55082 5/2/2022 Stillwater Planning Commission, This application is for a Variance to maximum structure coverage in the RB: Two -Family District. We are looking to add a 287 sq. ft. deck onto our existing home. While City Code allows our home and property to have a total maximum impervious surface coverage of 50% of the lot size, that is further divided into structures (the home) and other impervious surfaces (the driveway). Our existing home has already maxed out impervious surface coverage for structures of 25%. That being said, we are still considerably under the total maximum impervious surface coverage of 50%. The deck size, material type, and look are consistent with our neighborhood decks. ESTIMATED LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Date: 5/16/2022 Prepared By: Frannie Nielsen Address: 3671 Summit Ln Lot Size: 9,616 Square feet Zone District: RB Maximum Coverage Allowed Structural % = 25 S.F. = 2,404 Impervious % = 25 S.F. = 2,404 Total % = 50 S.F. = 4,808 Existing Coverage* *Estimates are based on Washington County Assessors data, aerial imagery measurements and other sources. Information herein shall not be used as a replacement of a survey or accurate site plan. House 2,088 SF Addition(s) Porch/Deck 150 SF Garage Total 2,238 I 23% Walkway 28 SF Driveway 746 SF Patio Other Total 774 I 8% Structural 2,238 Other Impervious 774 Total 3,012 I 31.3% Additional Coverages Permitted Structural Impervious Total 166 SF 1 2% 1,630 SF 1 17% 1,796 SF 1 19% NOTES ii11was The Birthplace of Minnesota ATTENTION All City of Stillwater Boards and Commission members are invited to attend a training on Tuesday, June 14, 2022 6 PM at City Hall Council Chambers Presenter: Kori Land, City Attorney DETAILS: Time: 6PM — 7 PM 7 PM — 9 PM Attendees: All Boards & Commissions Heritage Preservation Commission & Planning Commission Topics: Conduct of Meetings Conflicts of Interest Data Practices Act/Social Media Municipal Planning/Zoning Public Hearings Having you join in person is preferred however zoom will be available To participate, go online to www.zoomgov.com/loin or call 1-646-828-7666. Enter the following when prompted: Meeting ID: 161 666 4550 Passcode: 530429 Please email regrets to Beth Wolf, City Clerk at bwolf@ci.stillwater.mn.us 216 4th Street North, Stillwater Minnesota — 651-430-8800 — www.ci.stillwater.mn.us