HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-26 PRC MINCity of Stillwater
Parks and Recreation Board
Feb. 26, 2007
Present: Linda Amrein, chair
David Brandt, Rob McGarry, Adam Nyberg,
Cathy Sewilo and Sandy Snellman
Staff present: Planner Mike Pogge
Absent: Paul Donna
Ms. Amrein called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
Approval of minutes: Mr. McGarry, seconded by Ms. Snellman, moved approval of the
minutes of Jan. 22, 2007. Motion passed unanimously.
Ms. Amrein introduced new Park Board member, Councilmember Adam Nyberg. Mr.
Nyberg gave a brief overview of his background. Park Board members in turn introduced
themselves to Mr. Nyberg.
Action Items
Review Millbrook final PUD and final plat — Mr. Pogge reviewed the request for final plat
approval for Phase I of the Millbrook development. Mr. Pogge listed the proposed Phase
I park and trail improvements, plans which the Park Board had approved earlier. Jack
Welch, representing the developer, pointed out that the eastern portion of Outlot A, the
main, active park area, would be developed first; the remainder of the park area would
be developed with Phase II. Mr. Welch said the entire park area would be rough graded
and seeded, but the final grade may have to be changed somewhat. Ms. Amrein asked
about the trail along the south side of South Twin Lake; it was noted the trail is still in the
plans in Phase III. Mr. McGarry noted there had been no changes in the percentage of
park dedication or other park/trail improvements, other than the relocation of a segment
of the trail due to Brown's Creek regulations. Mr. McGarry asked about the timetable for
the final grading of Outlot A, referring to the previous experience with the park at
Legends. Mr. Brandt moved to recommend that the City Council approve the Millbrook
final (Phase I) park/trail plans as presented. Mr. Nyberg seconded the motion; motion
passed unanimously.
Review Legacy on Long Lake development plans — Mr. Pogge reviewed the proposed
trail and park dedication improvements for the Legacy development. He noted the
proposed park dedication is .35 acres. The developer is proposing cash in lieu of land
dedication; according to City policy, a cash in lieu of land would amount to about
$100,000. Mr. Pogge referred to a staff concern regarding the desire to have some
public access along Long Lake. However, Mr. Pogge pointed out that two existing
property owners are retaining the entire lake shorefront, and the shorefront property will
not be part of this development. Mr. Pogge said the developer is proposing to assist the
City is purchasing the Jackson Wildlife Management Area from the DNR; due to various
restrictions, that site would be limited to passive park/open space use, he noted. Mr.
Pogge explained that due to the site's location, DNR regulations apply, and the
developer will be required to provide more open space that would be required by the
City, thus the proposal to purchase the Jackson Wildlife Management Area.
Park and Recreation Board Minutes
February 26, 2007
Page 2 of 3
Ed Dulak was present representing the developer. He explained that he has been
working with the DNR for some nine months regarding the Jackson property purchase.
He suggested that the cash in lieu of dedication money could be earmarked for the
purchase, and he would make a contribution over and above the cash dedication to
assist in the purchase. Mr. Dulak noted that acquiring that property would enable the
proposed trail to be completed out to County Road 12. He also pointed out that there are
a number of other parks in the nearby area, and the developer is working with Grace
Baptist Church to provide play fields on church property in the future.
Mr. Nyberg questioned why the City would give up an existing road easement along the
lake and also whether the two existing property owners couldn't be required to donate
some public property. Mr. Pogge noted that the existing road easement is a prescriptive
easement, meaning it can only be used for a road — if the road goes away, the City has
no right to use the 60' right-of-way. Mr. Dulak said, if the Park Board feels it is important,
he could attempt to get a small parcel of Lakeshore from one of the current property
owners, but he pointed out that the DNR does not want a fishing pier on the parcel. Ms.
Amrein asked whether the City needs to own the Jackson Wildlife Management Area
and whether the City might be able to purchase the area without the assistance of this
developer. Ms. Snellman asked whether there would be a guarantee that the developer
would provide the public trail along the existing 72nd Street. Mr. McGarry suggested
there are too many unknowns and noted as things currently stand with the proposal, the
City is vacating a street and getting a third -acre park. Mr. Dulak pointed out that the
proposal, as it stands, does include the Jackson Wildlife Management Area. Mr. Dulak
said he was seeking an indication from the Park Board that the proposal is moving in the
right direction regarding park dedication issues. Ms. Snellman said she would be willing
to say to keep moving in the direction as outlined without making a commitment to it at
this time. Mr. Nyberg said in his view getting some Lakeshore property to go with the trail
system is a big factor; Mr. Dulak said he would speak with the property owner regarding
that possibility. Ms. Amrein said in her view, the Jackson Area is very valuable as open
space, versus the two additional acres of active park that would be required. Mr. Brandt
questioned the value of the Jackson Area to the City, what the City could do with the
property if the DNR didn't own it. Mr. Dulak suggested the City would be a better steward
of the area than the DNR, pointing out that the DNR has not maintained the area and
overgrowth is threatening the viability of trees. Mr. Pogge summarized that, based on
comments, direction would be that the Board approves the trail plan, the one-third acre
park dedication contingent on the acquisition of the Jackson Wildlife Management Area,
and the acquisition of the lakeshore parcel in question. No formal action was taken.
Review and recommend playground equipment for Munkelwicz Park — Mr. Pogge
reviewed the three equipment options, two of which include a 10-15 space net. Mr.
Brandt said he had the opportunity to have a number of children review the equipment,
and the children liked option two because of the monkey bar components, the spinning
overhead devices, the climbing wall and net. Another advantage of option two (B), he
said, is the gazebo -style roof protection from the elements. Mr. Nyberg said he would
favor option B. Ms. Snellman expressed a concern about possible vandalism to the net
and asked if it would be reinforced to prevent that potential; Mr. Pogge suggested that
weathering would be a larger problem. Mr. Pogge reviewed colors. It was noted that
given the location by Brown's Creek, a more natural color would be appropriate, rather
than a bright red. Ms. Amrein moved to recommend option B for the Munkelwicz Park
play equipment for the older children, with the color scheme of the more natural, muted
tones. Mr. McGarry seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously.
Park and Recreation Board Minutes
February 26, 2007
Page 3 of 3
Consider recommending approval of a special event permit from the American Diabetes
Association' to use Pioneer Park for its annual walkathon and March of Dimes use of the
parking lot across from the Historic Courthouse and Triangle Park for its annual
walkathon — Mr. Pogge noted that last year a number of complaints had been received
about the use of "spray chalk" to mark the route of the American Diabetes Association's
event. He stated the sponsors regretted that had happened and approval is
recommended with the condition that chalk not be used. Mr. Nyberg asked whether
there was any need for traffic control; Mr. Pogge stated the sponsors work with the
Police Department regarding that issue. Mr. McGarry moved to recommend approval of
both special event park use requests as proposed. Ms. Snellman seconded the motion;
motion passed unanimously.
Informational Items
Review Capital Improvement Plan related to park improvements — Mr. Pogge reviewed
the revision to the proposed 2007-2011 CIP park projects. Mr. Nyberg asked if such
reductions occur every year. Mr. Pogge noted that the initial CIP requests amount to a
"wish list," and generally are subject to revisions. Mr. Pogge pointed out that there is
about $1.3 million for all City departments to spend on capital improvement projects
each year; the majority of that money is spent on streets, engineering and parks. Mr.
Pogge said, from his viewpoint, the most disappointing aspect of the revisions relate to
funding for the Munkelwicz Park improvements. Ms. Amrein brought up the issue of
implementing some type of city tax to fund such improvements.
Review concept plan for Washington Park - Mr. Pogge reviewed the concept plans. He
noted that one of the proposals is the addition of a substantial amount of lighting,
utilizing decorative style Tight fixtures; replacement of the gazebo with stage area; trails;
permanent restroom facilities; irrigation system; and other improvements. He stated the
donor wishes to begin work in April, with opening July 1. Mr. Pogge brought up the issue
of a house at the northeast corner of the site than encroaches on park property. There
was a brief discussion regarding the lighting proposal. He said final plans would likely be
available for review at the March Park Board meeting.
• Ms. Sewilo pointed out the lights at Northland Park are on during the week, but not
on weekends.
• There was a brief discussion regarding the status of the issue of the basketball
courts at Staples Field. Mr. Pogge said the issue would be brought back to the Board
as a discussion item sometime this spring.
• Ms. Amrein asked if the Board wished to elect a new chair and vice chair at this
meeting. Members asked if Ms. Amrein would continue as chair, and she stated she
would do so unless someone else was interested. Mr. McGarry stated he would
continue as vice chair, unless someone else was interested. Ms. Snellman moved to
have Ms. Amrein continue as chair and Mr. McGarry continue as vice chair for the
coming year. Mr. Nyberg seconded the motion; motion passed unanimously.
Mr. McGarry, seconded by Ms. Snellman, moved to adjourn at 8:53 p.m. Motion passed
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon Baker
Recording Secretary