HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-01-19 HPC MINAter.
IQ IIA INI IA CI V5 •IN NI IO TA
HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
January 19, 2022
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
Chair Mino called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Chair Mino, Commissioners Finwall, Heimdahl, Holmes, Larson, Thueson, Walls
Absent: Councilmember Dunker
Staff: City Planner Wittman
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Po-ssible approval of minutes of December 9.2021 Regular Meeting
Motion by Commissioner Larson, seconded by Commissioner Thueson, to approve the minutes of the
December 9, 2021 meeting. All in favor.
OPEN FORUM
There were no public comments.
CONSENT AGENDA
There were no items on the Consent Agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
There were no public hearings.
NEW BUSINESS
Case No. 2021-39: Consideration of a Design Permit for a Master Sign Plan for the property located at
4 0 2 M ai n St N i n theDown town DQ5i gn Reyj 2w D i5jri ct a n d theN i gh b orh o od C o nsgryad o n d is trict. AB
Co.. property owner. -Tabled From the December Meeting,
City Planner Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting a Design Permit for a master sign plan for
a multi -tenant structure. In December, the HPC determined additional information was necessary and
since then, a comprehensive sign plan has been developed. The applicant is proposing the following:
1) four, six square foot wall signs to be located on each side of the main entrance; 2) one, 20 square
foot wall sign for the southern -most, ground -level tenant space; 3) four, 25 square foot wall signs for
the northern -most, ground -level, mill tenant spaces; 4) one, 30 square foot sign wall sign for ground -
level tenant space "B" (currently occupied by Victoriano's Pizza); 5) one, 35 square foot wall sign for
ground -level tenant space "C" (currently occupied by the Stillwater Art Guild); and 6) one, 30 square
foot free standing sign for Staples Mill Antiques. She reported that Commissioner Thueson suggested
an additional condition of approval about the building sign "Isaac Staples Sawmill." Staff finds the
proposed sign plan conforms to the Downtown Design Manual, City Code, the historic district, and
does not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and its
surroundings. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the multi -tenant sign plan and associated
signage with four conditions.
Commissioner Finwall noted a scrivener's error, under the lower level signage, the lighting should
state "one gooseneck light" rather than "one gooseneck sign." She also said that the sign plan should
indicate that the size of the lower level signs, as tenants change over, should be the same size.
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
January 19, 2022
Ms. Wittman answered that some of the tenant spaces are larger and there are some spaces where
there are more gooseneck lights to allow for a larger sign.
Commissioner Finwall replied if they are larger tenant spaces, a solution might be to require a certain
height for all signs but allow varying lengths.
Ms. Wittman explained that all the lower level tenant signs are a maximum 2.5 feet. The ones that are
1.5 are for the three upstairs units and the "For Lease" sign. All lower level unit spaces will have the
same sign height and the others will be slightly smaller due to their location.
Commissioner Finwall suggested including that in the sign plan rather than "refer to the chart."
Ms. Wittman replied that staff didn't include that language in the sign plan because the varying
proposed lengths correspond with the unit letters. A schedule of some sort is needed to clarify which
unit will have which signage in the future. Visual representation is needed.
Commissioner Larson agreed that the exhibit shows the intent and its net result is that signs will be
no more than 2.5 feet. He recognized the conflict between lighting that is there now and what the
proposed guidelines say. That is the only thing he feels needs to be modified..
Commissioner Thueson suggesting language allowing gooseneck lights to remain where they are as
depicted on the exhibit. Regarding the larger building sign, he suggested that even if the name of the
building changes, the sign should still depict the name by which the building was known historically.
Motion by Commissioner Thueson to approve Case No. 2021-39, Design Permit for a Master Sign Plan
for the property located at 402 Main St N, with the four staff -recommended conditions, adding Condition
#5 that the number and location of gooseneck lights remain as shown on the attachment, and adding
Condition #6 that the building sign should use only a name by which the building was known historically.
Commissioner Finwall seconded the motion and offered an amendment to correct the phrase "gooseneck
light" vs "gooseneck sign" and also adding Condition #7 requiring a 2.5' max height for the lower level
tenants in the first attachment of the sign plan.
Commissioner Thueson stated that would be redundant but doesn't hurt so he agreed to the amendment.
City Planner Wittman suggested the motion for approval could include the four recommended
conditions and submittal of an amended sign plan that notes changes to 1A, stating "The historic
building sign may be used only for a name by which the building was known during the lumber era
1843-1914"; to 2C, stating "Size shall not exceed 2.5' in height as defined per unit on the attached
Exhibits A and B"; and to 2E, stating "Gooseneck lighting is to be installed above each sign in locations
as depicted on Exhibit B, attached. Lights to be compatible to the building."
All in favor.
Case No. 2022-05: Consideration of a Design Permit to amend -the master sign plan For theproper y
located at 401 Main StS in the Downtown Design Revi wD-isirict, Gina Kazmerski.f Im
Woodbury_ applicant and DCK Enterprises LLC. property owner.
Ms. Wittman stated that the applicant is requesting a Design Permit for a multi -tenant sign plan
amendment for the addition of a projecting sign, currently for Unpaved Athleisure. Staff finds the
proposed sign plan amendment conforms to the Downtown Design Manual, City Code, the historic
district, and does not negatively alter the essential character and significance of the building, site, and
its surroundings. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the amendment with five conditions.
Chair Mino asked if the Stillwater Farm Store sign is still there.
Page 2 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
January 19, 2022
Ms. Wittman replied yes. A former representative of the building asked if it could be painted over and
staff advised that any alteration to that sign should come before the HPC since it has been there for a
number of years and may be considered historic.
Commissioner Finwall remarked it would be beneficial to have a comprehensive sign plan for all
future spaces to identify what each tenant will get.
Ms. Wittman pointed out the City cannot make anybody submit for signage they don't intend to have.
Commissioner Finwall responded it is the job of staff and the HPC to create the comprehensive sign
plan so future signs will comply with what the Commission has approved.
Ms. Wittman responded it is not the HPC's job to design signage, but to review it for conformance to
the guidelines.
Commissioner Finwall replied not necessarily design, but make sure it's comprehensive and
consistent for the future.
Commissioner Larson noted the applicants have submitted a comprehensive sign plan for the tenants
that they have. They do not need to design signs for all the other combinations of tenants that could
come before the HPC. If the use or tenants change they could come back.
Motion by Commissioner Thueson, seconded by Commissioner Heimdahl, to approve Case No. 2022-05,
Design Permit to amend the master sign plan for the property located at 401 Main St S, with the five staff -
recommended conditions. All in favor.
Case -No. 2022-0-6; Consideration of a Design Permit.ta- rep lace the roof and gutter system on the
Stillwater Public Library_14cate-i_at2234th St N in the Downtown Design Review District. City of
Stillwater, property owner and applicant.
Ms. Wittman stated that on behalf of the Stillwater Public Library, the City of Stillwater has applied for
a Design Permit for exterior modifications to the Stillwater Public Library, namely replacing the
existing roof and gutter system with like materials. Staff finds the project substantially conforming to
the standards and guidelines and therefore, staff recommends approval with three conditions.
Chair Minos offered kudos to the City and the Library for choosing to use like materials.
Commissioner Finwall asked if the old tiles can be recycled.
Mick Greiner, Stillwater Facilities Manager, on Zoom, said they are looking at whether tiles could be
recycled to reduce the cost.
Chair Mino said sometimes donors will buy those tiles to contribute to the project.
Motion by Commissioner Walls, seconded by Commissioner Larson, to approve Case No. 2022-06,
Design Permit to replace the roof and gutter system on the Stillwater Public Library located at 223 4th St
N, with the three staff -recommended conditions. All in favor.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS
FYI
There were no other discussion items.
Ms. Wittman shared that Zoning Administrator Tait has resigned to move back east. A vacancy will be
advertised soon, but the Department is currently down one staff member. She is inquiring with the
Page 3 of 4
Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
January 19, 2022
State Historic Preservation Office grant program about potential funding to help hire someone to look
at past plans and studies and possibly for local designations in the future.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Finwall, seconded by Commissioner Walls, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting
was adjourned at 7:41 p.m.
ATTEST:
Abbi Wittman, City Planner
Amy Mi o, hair
Page 4 of 4