The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014-08-04 HPC Packet AGENDA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING Council Chambers, 216 Fourth Street North August 4, 2014 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Possible approval of minutes of July 7, 2014 regular meeting minutes IV. OPEN FORUM - The Open Forum is a portion of the Commission meeting to address subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. The Chairperson may reply at the time of the statement of may give direction to staff regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. Out of respect for others in attendance, please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. V. CONSENT AGENDA (ROLL CALL) - All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the Heritage Preservation Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a commission member or citizen so requests, in which event, the items will be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. A. Case No. 2014-29 Request for a design permit for a sign to be located at 2510 Curve Crest Blvd. Michael Dvoracek, Signs Unlimited, representing Allstate. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS The Chairperson opens the hearing and will ask city staff to provide background on the proposed item. The Chairperson will ask for comments from the applicant, after which the Chairperson will then ask if there is anyone else who wishes to comment. Members of the public who wish to speak will be given 5 minutes and will be requested to step forward to the podium and must state their name and address. At the conclusion of all public testimony the Commission will close the public hearing and will deliberate and take action on the proposed item A. Case No. 2014-24 Continuation of a request for Design Review Permit to build a new, infill single family residence at 324 Wilkins Street East. RB-Two Family Residential. Chris Meronuck, Creative Homes, Inc., applicant, representing Thomas Weber, owners. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Case No. 2014-19 Review of Case No. 2014-19, a design permit for a 26" x 120" sign for A'SALONNA Salon & Spa at 225 East Chestnut Street. St. Croix Signs representing Ernie Shores, applicant. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. NAPC CAMP Training: August 22nd B. Staff Updates IX. ADJOURNMENT TME IIITNIEI CE Of MINNEEITN HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING July 7, 2014 7:00 P.M. Chairman Larson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Chairman Larson, Commissioners Goodman, Johnson, Mino, Welty, Council Representative Menikheim Absent: Commissioners Krakowski and Branjord Staff: City Planner Wittman APPROVAL OF MINUTES Possible approval of June 2, 2014 meeting minutes Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Mino, to approve the minutes of the June 2, 2014 meeting. All in favor, 5-0. OPEN FORUM There were no public comments. CONSENT AGENDA Case No. 2014-23 Request for a storefront sign and awning for The Wedge and Wheel at 308 Chestnut Street East. Scott Zahren, owner and Chris Kohtz, applicant. Case No. 2014-25 Request to replace and enlarge the existing cooler, freezer, and dry storage area in the rear of the building for Oasis Cafe Inc., 806 Main Street South. Craig Beemer, owner and applicant. Case No. 2014-26 Request to add an outdoor patio and dumpster enclosure for HAF Architecture and LOLO Restaurant at 233 Main Street South. Michael Hoefler, applicant. Case No. 2014-27 Request to replace existing tenant marquee sign on both East and West elevation sides of Liberty Village main building at 105 New England Place. Chauncey Peterson, applicant. Liberty Village LLC/Michael Greek, owner. Motion by Commissioner Mino, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor, 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS Case No. 2014-24 Request for a Design Review to build a new, infill single family residence at 324 Wilkins Street East. RB -Two Family Residential. Chris Meronuck, Creative Homes, Inc., applicant, representing Thomas Weber, owner. City Planner Wittman reviewed the case. The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for a proposed single family residence to be constructed at 324 Wilkins Street East, an undeveloped lot. In 2005 the previous Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting July 7, 2014 residence, constructed in the early 1880s, was destroyed by fire. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and an infill design permit is required for the new home. Chris Meronuck and Dave Hackworthy, Creative Homes Inc, and Thomas and Laura Weber, owners presented the house design. The design was inspired by the client's needs, based on Creative Home's model floor plan designs. Commissioners indicated the application was not entirely consistent with the design guidelines and was contemporary suburban in design. The Commission noted the garage and driveway are not respective to existing street and neighborhood patterns, the garage size does not reduce the impact to the street front and the design does not include four-sided architecture. The Commission discussed a preference towards reducing the garage size and moving it back or to Wilkins Street, removal of the stone treatment on the front facade and enhancements to the south facade to create more four-sided design. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to continue the public hearing. All in favor, 5-0. DESIGN PERMITS Case No. 2014-28 Request for a projecting sign for The Pole Barn at 122 Water Street South (AKA 125 Main Street South). Rochelle Jacobs, applicant. City Planner Wittman explained that the applicant is requesting approval of one projecting sign to be located at 122 Water Street South. The painted wood sign will read 'The Pole Barn Studio' and is proposed to be hung from an existing metal bracket. The sign will be approximately five square feet. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1) the two sides of the sign shall be the exact same: light on dark or dark on light; 2) surfaces where existing sign arms may be removed will be patched to match the existing facade; 3) lighting, if installed, shall be downcast and shielded from direct pedestrian or motorist view and staff shall review lighting fixture prior to installation; 4) the sign shall be installed with a clearance of 8' from the sidewalk; 5) all revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC; 6) no sign may be installed without first obtaining a sign permit. Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Welty, to approve Case No. 2014-28 for one projecting sign, with the condition that the sign consist of black and silver colors only, and conditions recommended by staff. All in favor, 5-0. OTHER BUSINESS South Hill Residential Podcast Final Products City Planner Wittman and Consultant Dan Hoisington reviewed the Residential Podcast materials. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Welty, seconded by Commissioner Goodman, to adjourn. All in favor, 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Julie Kink Recording Secretary Page 2 of 2 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 4, 2014 APPLICANT: REQUEST: CASE NO.: DP/2014-29 Michael Dvoracek, Signs Unlimited, representing Allstate Design Permit request for signage at 2510 Curve Crest Blvd located within the West Stillwater Business Park Design Review District ZONING: BP-C: Business Park Commercial COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Commercial PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Design Permit for a new 28 square foot sign set to be located on the front of the structure. The signs are blue and white, internally -lit channel letters reading 'Allstate' and will include the company logo. The sign will be 8.5" off of the wall face APPLICABLE GUIDELINES, REGULATIONS AND FINDINGS Signs in the in the BP-C zoning district must conform to an adopted multitenant sign plan as well as the sign regulations. While the proposed sign meets the requirements of the sign regulations, there is no multi -tenant sign plan in place for this structure. The signs also conform to the 1989 West Stillwater Business Park Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission approve the Case No. 2014-29 as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Plans shall be substantially similar to the designs submitted and dated 4/21/2014. 2. Prior to installation, the landlord shall remove all existing, non -conforming signage including unpermitted banners. 2510 Curve Crest Blvd. (Allstate) Case No. DP/2014-29 (HPC: 8/4/14) Page 1of2 3. Any additional temporary signage shall be in conformance with the City's temporary sign policy. 4. No additional permanent signage shall be permitted. 5. Substantial changes shall be review by the Heritage Preservation Commission. ATTACHMENTS Sign Specifications (2 pages) 2510 Curve Crest Blvd. (Allstate) Case No. DP/2014-29 (HPC: 8/4/14) Page 2 of 2 Bee NUMBER: g 0 W p lm a g L Ya flhlwater N A A t, 01. MINNESOTA HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 4, 2014 CASE NO.: DR/2014-24 APPLICANT: Chris Meronuck, Creative Homes, representing Thomas and Laura Weber, property owners REQUEST: Continuation of the consideration of a Design Review of an infill structure to be located at 324 Wilkins Street East, a vacant property located in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND At the Commission's last regularly -scheduled meeting, the Commission reviewed architectural plans for a new residence to be located at 324 Wilkins Street East. The Commission determined the garage and driveway are not respective te- of existing street and neighborhood patterns, the garage size does not reduce the impact to the street front and the design does not include four-sided architecture. The Commission provided direction to the applicants and property owners to modify the plans. A new plan set has been submitted for HPC review. The new facade renderings include a reduced -sized garage that will access off of Wilkins Street. Although the garage is in front of the south side of the house, the garage and house are compliant with the municipal zoning regulations. Additionally, the new proposal includes the removal of the brick facade elements. Lastly, the design includes dining room windows on the south elevation of the house. COMMISSION DISCUSSION The Commission should discuss the new design as to whether or not the design meets the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines: Neighborhood and Streets Building Site Architectural Detail Massing and scale of a new Locate garage and driveway The facade of the building should be compatible with neighboring structures. to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. Minimize garage impact on new structure massing and street front. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. Use masonry and stone authentically. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and retaining walls. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the new design is consistent with the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines and recommends approval of DP/2014-24 with the following conditions: 1. The Building Permit plans shall be consistent with the plans dated 7/31/2014, on file in the Community Development Department. 2. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. DR/2014-24: 324 Wilkins HPC: August 4, 2014 Page 2 of 3 Determination of the distinction between "major" and the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior building permit. ATTACHMENTS Proposed Site Plan Facade Elevation D (4 pages) Floor Plan DR/2014-24: 324 Wilkins HPC: August 4, 2014 Page 3 of 3 "minor" is defined in to the issuance of a HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: July 7, 2014 CASE NO.: DR/2014-24 APPLICANT: Chris Meronuck, Creative Homes, representing Thomas Weber, owner REQUEST: Consideration of Design Review of an infill structure to be located at 324 Wilkins Street East, a vacant property located in the Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) ZONING: RB-Two Family Res. COMP PLAN DISTRICT: LMDR-Low/Medium Density Res. PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST AND BACKGOUND The applicant has submitted a Design Permit application for consideration of design review of a proposed single family residence to be constructed at 324 Wilkins Street East, an undeveloped lot located in the Carli and Schulenburg's Addition to the City of Stillwater. In 2005 the previous residence, constructed in the early 1880s, was destroyed by fire. The property is in the Neighborhood Conservation Design District and as such an infill design review permit is required for the new home. Prior to the submittal of the application, City staff provided Creative Homes with the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines. In late April staff reviewed a proposed design for consistency with the NCD guidelines. Staff advised the applicant of various ways to enhance the design to be consistent with the guidelines including, but not limited to, decreasing the garage mass on the streetscape, creating a larger front porch spanning the distance of the home as well as increasing the four-sided design of this home. DISCUSSION All infill homes in the NCD are required to follow the NCD design guidelines. These design guidelines serve as a common reference for all those involved in the process of new construction in the district including property owners, neighbors, residents, architects, designers, builders, city staff, and the commission. The guidelines are intended to serve as a framework to guide the design process, while allowing for individuality and creativity in architectural design. Twenty-seven guidelines make up the NCD design manual. These guidelines cover three (3) general areas including Neighborhood and Streets, Building and Site, and Architectural Detail. Neighborhood and Streets Massing and scale of a new building should be compatible with neighboring structures. A one-story home is proposed. This is consistent with the one and one and a half story homes in the neighborhood. Respect the existing rhythm of the streetscape. The applicant is proposing to face the home toward North Broadway Street which is consistent with the streetscape. Follow alignment and setbacks predominant on the street and adjacent properties. The setbacks of the home are proposed to be consistent with the zoning regulations as well as the prevailing front yard setback on both Wilkins and North Broadway. Design new roofs to be compatible with forms of existing roofs in the neighborhood. Most of the older homes in the neighborhood have traditional gabled roofs. The front (Broadway) facade includes three gables where the side (Wilkins) includes one. Building height should be considered in choosing roof forms, architectural style, and relating to context. The height of the building is proportionate to the architectural style. Building and site design should respond to natural features. Preserve significant trees. Although this is a flat lot, the applicant is proposing the removal of ten trees on the east side of the home. When retaining walls are necessary, minimize their impact. Respect the site's natural slope in new building design: minimize cut, fill and No retaining walls are proposed. retaining walls. Building Site Locate garage and driveway to respect existing street and neighborhood patterns. There is an existing garage that, while not indicated in the application, will need to be removed as the property may not contain greater than 1,000 square feet of garage coverage. Though the Assessor's records indicate a construction year of 1970, the City's building permit files do not contain verification of this. DR/2014-24: 324 Wilkins HPC: July 7, 2014 Page 2 of 4 If the garage was proposed to access of the existing driveway, the driveway would be consistent with other properties along Wilkins. Minimize garage impact on While the garage and driveway are proposed off of Broadway, which is consistent with other homes in the neighborhood, the three -car mass creates a garage dominance in this neighborhood. new structure massing and street front. The size and mass of the structure should be compatible with the size of the property. The size and mass of the home is compatible though the garage is not. While there is one, three -car garage in the vicinity of the subject parcel, most properties contain detached, two -car garages. Consider front porch elements in the design of infill structures. The applicant is proposing one, 160 square foot porch. Accessory buildings should be compatible with the main building. No accessory building is proposed. As indicated, one garage is located on the property but must be removed prior to the occupancy of the existing home. Design and detail new construction as four-sided architecture. While the applicant is proposing cultured stone on the east facade, this is not carried throughout (at least) the south facade facing Wilkins Street. The Wilkins Street facade contains little elements to help break the massing of the home. Architectural Detail The facade of the structure should be compatible in scale and character to the houses of the streetscape. The homes on the west side of North Broadway are modest homes with little to not decorative elements. The cultured stone and shakes on the front of the structure are consistent with the one home on the east side of Broadway that is able to be viewed from the street. Building elements should be proportional to the scale and style of the building, and its context. Nearly half of the front facade is garage. Additionally, this garage is situated 10' past the front stoop. Use architectural details to create visual interest and support architectural style. This is a contemporary suburban home. The design elements fit with this architectural style though the style does not blend into the existing streetscape. In new building design, consider appropriate materials, textures and colors, and their relationship to other buildings of the neighborhood. The architectural style and materials is in harmony with the home directly across North Broadway from this property. The home, however, was built in 1998 and predated the City's Neighborhood Conservation District. Use masonry and stone The stone on this structure is used as a decorative element DR/2014-24: 324 Wilkins HPC: July 7, 2014 Page 3 of 4 authentically. and is not carried throughout the entire design of the home. ALTERNATIVES The HPC has several alternatives related to these two requests: A. Approve. If the proposed infill design review requests is found acceptable to the HPC, the HPC should move to approve DP/2014-24. Staff would recommend the following minimum condition for approval. 1. All minor modifications to the plans shall be approved in advance by the City Planner. All major modifications shall be approved in advance by the HPC. Determination of the distinction between "major" and "minor" is defined in the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Exterior lighting shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. Approve in part. C. Deny. If the HPC finds that the proposal is not consistent with the approved Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines, then the Commission could deny the request. With a denial, the basis of the action is required to be given. Furthermore, the denial would prohibit the applicant from resubmittal of a substantially similar application within one year. D. Table. If the HPC needs additional information to make a decision, the requests could be tabled until your August, 2014 meeting. The 60-0day deadline for HPC action is August 20, 2014. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Commission consider one of two options: table the application for new submittal of a design consistent with the historic streetscape and architectural design; or deny the application on the basis it is not considerate to the Neighborhood Conservation District guidelines for the preservation of this historic streetscape and neighborhood character. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Design Review Checklist (2 pages) Certificate of Survey Adjacent Home Summary (8 pages) Proposed Elevations and Facade Details (7 pages) Neighborhood Conservation Map Stillwater Neighborhood Survey Map DR/2014-24: 324 Wilkins HPC: July 7, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Pictometry Online http://pol.pictometry.com/en-us/app/print.php?title=324 Wilkins Street East Aerial&date_fmt=... 324 Wilkins Street East Aerial Print Date: 07/03/2014 Image Date:05/03/2011 Level:Neighborhood 1 of 1 7/3/2014 11:12 AM Design Review Application and Checks This Design Review Application and Checklist should be submitted with a City Fla nniTIE Application Form Contact: Stillwater City Planning Office 651-30-8821 City Hall 216 N. 4th St Stillwater, MN 55082 wWw.ci.stillwater rim us ProjectA 3z4 tj; mice S+- E Applicant name address, telephone: 707 G04n,ana '7`rr` Sw ; a-(e 110 'i+i1.1 5S12. GSI`a -L 1. Neighborhood Architectural Styles: a Vernacular ❑ Italianate o Queen Anne o Gothic ❑ Greek Revival o Second Empire „la' American Foursquare ❑ a Other: rVtl�S 2. Prevailing neighborhood streetfront setback: (Guidelines #1, #2, #3) Prevailing setback on block (est.) ZS Average setback on block (est.) ZS Proposed new house setback 30 3 . Is the pattern of homes in your neighborhood 1, 1-1/2, or2 stories high? (Guidelin • #4, #5) Stories 1 1-1/2 2 House on right a ,..'121f ❑ House on left o • ❑ House to rear ❑ ❑ Prevailing on black ❑ �f a Prevailing opposite block rie 0 Proposed new house dye a 4 4. Prevailing Front Porch pattern in your neighborhood: (Guideline #13) Front Porch None ❑ Prevailing on block 0 Prevailing opposite block o Proposed new house Notes: House on right House on left House to rear Stick y 5. Prevailing Garage Location pattern in you rnei . orhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) Front Rear Side Garage Garage Garage House on right o House on left a House to rear a ❑ Prevailing on block Prevailing opposite block ❑ a Proposed new house o 6. Prevailing Garage Size in your neighborhood: (Guidelines #10, #11) I stall 2 stall 3 stall Garage Garage Garage House on right n ,cie` ❑ House on left House to rear / ❑ a Prevailing on block a / u Prevailing opposite block ❑ ❑ Proposed new house ❑ ❑ ,2" 7. Is the proposed garage compatible in form and detail with the design character of the main house? (Guideline # 14) Y�5 8. If the proposed structure/garage location, setbacks, size or general design character does not fit prevailing neighborhood patterns, how do you propose to reduce its impact on the neighborhood and streetscape? itti pvtiia ry¢ fin..o+�¢L, cdd jj4� iL ffff cep-0,, 4-l 'i 5td 1 ([4 Stillwater Conservation District tp 1 of 2) Design Guidelines Design Review Application and Checklist 9. Does the proposed structure work with natural slopes and contours of the property? (Guidelines #6, #7, #8) Structure sited parallel to slope „el' Building deigned to reduce cut and fi1I (minimized red retaining walls) a Landscaping incorporated into grading changes Notes: 10. Are there significant trees on the property? Will any trees be removed or damaged by new construction? (Guideline #9) yap'' Types of trees CL r ❑ Heights I5' o Trunk (-Timm 4 ri Notes: A pp.-c i (�1 a f, Ii red 0 Good Neighbor Considerations 1. Will the proposed structure significantly affect yourneighbor's access to sunlight in adjacent yards, patios or rooms? (Guideline #21) House to right: A-Jc House to left: House to rear: a Notes: How will you mitigate anynegative sunlight impacts on neighbors? I Locate structure on lotto minimize impact o Adjust building height, or portions of building, to minimize impact Q Other: 2. Will the proposed structure significantly affect your neighbors' privacy?(Guidelines #22, #23) House to right: ,1? House to left: /L r House to rear: / Notes: How will you mitigate any negative impacts on neighbors' privacy? o Offset/locate windows to reduce impact • Use obscure glass in window • Locate balconies to minimize impact. jet Use landscaping elements for screening o Other: 3. How is outdoor lighting impact rninimiaed for neighbors?(Guideline #25) Lights are located or directed away from neighboring property O Light fixtures are shielded to prevent glare at neighboring property O Other: To be indnded with this Application and sr-- .e+ Site Plan: include location of proposed building(s) on property, lot area; indicate impervious surface, propertylines, street/ sidewalk location and approximate location of adjarpnt structures. Indicate proposed outdoor deck/patio and landscaping features. ,BufdinEr Plan: dimensions, first floor area square footage. Building Elevations: indicate building height, windows, materials, and color on all elevations. Indicate proposed exterior lighting. zi Photographs of site and streetscape. 2 Regular Planning Department Development Application Form Stillwater Conservation District Design Guicb ices (p 2 of 2) ILO 0 _J EXISTING -- GARAGE J rr L — J --EXISTING SHED //fEVST1NG GARAGE 0 I fr-T L_L1 I 589°22'45" 150.00 EXISTING rouse I I. 1 418.17 '14.33' 0/ /36.0 22.0 -30.0- N• 150.00}.Af 589°22'45"YY 0 0 EAST W1LKIN STREET LOT 5 = 15,000 SQ. FT. HSE/GAR = 2,712 SQ. FT. PORCH = 183 SQ. FT. DRIVEWAY = 912 SQ. FT. Total Impervious = 3,807 SQ. FT. OR 25.4% OF LOT AREA 0) 0 NORTH BROADWAY Address: NORTH BROADWAY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 15, CARL! AND S'CHULENBURG' SCHULENBURG'S ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct survey of the above described property and that it was performed by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. That this survey does not purport to show all improvements, easements or encroachments, to the property except as shown thereon. Signed this EIC day of May , 2014. James R Hill, Inc., SCALE IN FEET 30 60 1 inch = 30 feet 90 Bearings are on assumed datum By. DRFLIV \ARY Harold C. Peterson, Minnesota L.S. No. 12294 Notes: 1. Building dimensions shown are for horizontal & vertical placement of structure only. See architectural plans for building & foundation dimensions. 2. No specific soils investigation hos been completed on this lot by James R. Hill, Inc. The suitability of soils to support the specific house proposed is not the responsibility of James R. Hill, Inc. or the surveyor. 3. No specific title search for existence or non— existence of recorded or un—recorded easements has been conducted by the surveyor as a part of this survey. Only easements per the recorded plat are shown. 5. Site improvement and encroachment are from survey provided by client. 0 x900.0 (930.0) tc Denotes set spike Denotes set iron monument Denotes found iron monument Denotes existing elevation Denotes proposed elevation Denotes proposed drainage Denotes top of curb Bench Mark• 9oa.00 _ TNH- Proposed Garage Floor @ Front= Proposed Garage Top of Block= Proposed House Top of Block= Proposed Lowest Floor= Proposed Top of Block at Lookout Window= xxx 4,,J11 James R. Hill, Inc. PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORS 2500 NEST COUNT( ROAD 42, SURE 120, Bl1RH54ILLE, Iiiti 55337 PHONE: {952) 890-5044 FAX: (952) 890-6244 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR CREATIVE HOMES, INC. Lot 3, Block 15, CARU AND SC'HULENBURG'S ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota. DRAWN BY PLEA DATE 5/X/14 REVISIONS CAD FILE hse2014\340209 PROJECT NO. 340209 SHEET 1 OF 1 t7dC•tMst lri-f t.ahirbt rte. f 11.Ea mIVINW-R./ ., .. _ L'x: iY-f- !- - ./0 '-r„frds.:MM , value yfrr;:t44 2 _ L. -as... • imemr 1,mcom. ..lea“ • .: •% u vo iarin i L2 r , Ms _amRe n ,w1r+osn3,. RFALITCBHHECT 763.447.3151 FOR SALE I61,�E234•E459 31.1.4 T SXAQL ASPHALT SNRBB.ES 6-x6'x10' HI TIpSTON S 114' LAP 5117IM6 PCC*1 RAZE K16HT RATE POW . _ _ _ _ _ - i ALIR&, PASCJA 1 WANT ry D-EDn! 5A4x4 5 T. 5 Ile 94ART 6IDISS 514xm U]RIER TRM G0.TIPPP $TIX$ MAW LE'/E. ROOK LRE LEFT ELEVATION S�ii•r-vdli w-_ 11= w FRONT ELEVATION V4- • 1'-0- ter' mmllp ■■' �flr�il! . 111111 11I1r1111111►' 11 Aillin111I11111] ■■ IITIIME1111I1ti• AiIil1fuilI1.111mniii.iIIti■IIUI1p111Ilt ' .IlIM1n11■11ImnI1n111011lr1II11I111IIII , ''II111UI1�11fp1�11IIIt111�IiI1111111r�IlUIII1�1II�11I1r.11 ", �1 11A11111� i1111t11111■II1i��III IN 1 Nam m1...... n . ..i m11f111I➢....1fM%11f 71ii 11I NU 111111H 1 IN� .I■11 ■= - - _ 1= IWOI I lb I= I I Q . INU aim ■ I LUl ■ RIGHT ELEVATION III' • f'-O• PLATE IEIMT. (#AT 5.& REAR ELEVATION IV4' % 1'43' FLAT! 1EN+IT 10l11Lvir LEV. RCOR 60E 0 • r C MMEnt CR.611G [ A ,'wo -.t I4-rnn t Ki.C51.76391C FX 55,501480E CAEATNFHQ:LGA mad 1104n1.•11 n Ea F a a 5 A PLAN NAME. 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 2a14-Q22 SHEETHI.IM5ER: 1 b4'x1' 61,0' r I' EXT FOAM BeaULATION FUTURE GAME RM. Lg.4- BARFUTURE 1Y-0' PGURED LONG. LL ax 20"xEe FT&. MEG I.IGTQR, RA TO ATTIC. 5I.444YY RAbUH'Y`ND L /7 7 SLAB LENM- E LAVATEV 4' M N. PLVRED LaNGRETE ON 6' COMPACTED FILL b L L L. � I I 1 F 1 FUTURE FAMILY r- 1-- FMP cam. 1 rt4L GB( 3,7W6' F16. 8kt ` �I FUTURE OFFIGEI BEPRM. 2 6 TAT. FOAM 11✓<JA-ATTON ; IC r--� fr I Frr' J L. { SFr---j FUTURE I,ri, F3ElRM.3� F I t. t. -_I_ L.�BATSH�11 I 1 LJ_r? rF �~ lr1 1 1 1' .% 1 If IC II -� —_1lw --_._J .1- - .—.-i L L_ 1 r — - - - II 11 ilIsII Iq JI I L__-- SLAB1FtYSf II'-IO. 1- UNEXCAVATED 4' M. PCURED CONCRETE — / CR 6' CrTrt'ACTEO FILL FD. REIN TO PAY1-16Br Sx42'-1+TN a01YW C. YY 1' LE[76E aN 20'x8' CONC. PTEt t r J VERIFY, IV 9=3' (FLb. VERIFY LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 11K C/JLLNERCE DR iA W YKIDDBLRT.MM,E2, PH. O "L sSVCI FAaa'#o,a00 1L CREAP VE6 1..06 Ala ,mate m.w..SI tali tlaa.rm....• wihf nick tad a may n CP*N.ma.. On ,an.a.a.a ma.Y4 neoJ.rm,Inc MM Oka ta...� u-++ •+a Mn H.a. .a..F�ns>gimam .ew m.mur.axann� ilocansrf.,...H.M1.,Nina. en .e rr.. W. a.mw 0 n+a J r a t i a `al Ity 0 6 0 O a J >9AN! NAM€ CUSTOM PROJECT NUMBER: 2014-022 STET NUMBER: 2 Cr k 11080 5L DR, DINING 415. R•-6• KITCHEN R5. PA TRY 1 r-o•M 6-0xm-O FOYEI q G16. RS 4'_0• +Y1 i7!a �020 FI� gUTO d P.. 4Q$Q A.V14 40 • 4O401,0 FIX .. tows nEATILArTR 4256 GREAT RM, 17 LLE G4 r. RAJLMi r WM- In l0 MUD RM. R' C1. . . I'-IO.r 6'-10' 3550 54 1.5o6o F% / 5060 5R R0 '-0•x6',V / 5-42•x5-0• 15.-0.66,-0. M. EEDRM. CLS. C.Ff P-cr x 6-a 0x &AK PR. \ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN. I/4. • f'-0- RA 6AR (EATER + SA5 ELEC. r VENT [i t 8 1 W P1 1 R 0 Y 5 Y• s a PLAN RAW. CAJSTOM PRWECTHUM36Ft 2014-022 SHIRT 4•1164gER: 3-7 Ifi' OSS. EHEATMMa 6RAL¢OTE SPRAT FRAM WM -- 0 4 WELL RM 0.GVRY N15L. GREAT RM. 5/4 Ti&0.5B. ETa6YNEpzEO mu-5E5 .+.'5 PER TRF_5 MANUFACTURER FLO R TRY5R:5 R AZ PL. I• [XT. FLYIM IWAL.ATION E3ASEMENT 317 CRY. 5Lp8 1 MUD RM, DEN/SEI7RM, Y' Fi.CVR ▪ pray ME .NJSTOR. FIMM-AfMAI SECTION 114' . I'-0' 2 T5 TF5,051 10' EA. c) SECTION 4 r r T I I RIC1eiE IV 1▪ �2 itpa ▪ j _ J ROOF PLAN I' — a 100; ; L oat NOODAuFN. MN 55155 PH. 55,ZIF LAV 551Ary14HCtl CRUJIVEIICLCUM rtnavexpea v nW•• won, male ..rosefsra CM.r Non, bc. HU ewer r• r• Vow 4i t 4 pns a .pmWda eaat...amaro./ enm O ,S ne•ANm4erv. I5•I0.1.11' . _ xV bAYV R1.M• e6n — .bn reuses n•ggc•••. CD..•m••waek oris 3 gn PLAN NAME 1 CUSTOM PRO;CTHUMNEP 2014-O22 SHEET HOWER: 4 OF ELECTRICAL KET ImoDUPLEX MISEHiEE OATLEi Pe. PU=LE%sAJR.HT AeoyE couirER let,. u,EAPeRPROOP DJPLEx CUTLET I .. cl.MAID' FAULT FNERGLAP E4' DLLQ-IE% LIJTLF:T le. .WLF-FWrttreC PiYEX. QJFLEr w aPECIX FIN,Pro. E C 1iLET el sI LF%OUTLET ti MOM F& 77o sin? Jrot.g $ W41 5WT-. Ii T E•WAY SIATCT+ $, FWTc..AY SA4TOi1 iRLELST TrI NIF,I$ CEi:.NG ACi.'1E0 PICLh1'lE5CsNi UiHi kXiYFE WALL r iNTF.P 9CANDE5CDIT LYa.•r PD411. E PECEsfiED FC„AND y'ENT LIGHT PIXTIA= LIGHT FI%TB(E LLFTN PILL OMAN REWARCEP .1JcTICk CoX PLIOFPF,ENF OWN FIXTII E Q EXRAIST FAN EXNXISYFAN4..SIN CCT991xATION OLNLE1 GAANA+E DOER P.El R. F9 AMITIES MN. NAFFI eTFCTF %Arco 0 SAME OF/ECTON 2 1E1.V... I4f 4 TELEYISICN Z? TI[B'taSTRT II n.E:TRC METER FL£CTRIG Mei_ DISG041[CT SYAicW O EPENQR j$ RLIYN•IYFIaa aEILITG FFN CFF-PG MOOED WCZN7F9CCNT L:44T 1*XRIFIE W nt644. N FON U LIH FAN FTTC NAFF t*R7 NOTES I pA4YIDE AND, INSTALL LOCALLY CERTPIED DETECTORS AS FELVIRED RT NATIONAL FIRE PNOTFCTIPFC 4.560.IATIPµ fFFFA, AND P4ETA T RFPIJIRE.Eret OF ALL GLN1RNP6 Ca$ES- r FUTURE 6AME RM. FUTURE BAR I.._�,__—r r - -•II IF - L L- -_-II 1t � � I 1 FUTURE_P.� FAMILY �' FUTURE OFFICE/ BEORM. 2 II L -__ II II ) = �, / I 1 1 II I I I Iiiiii v I �.II liiii b BATH II —.- I- 77 MECH. I II 0 II 1 _ _ _ _ _yam F 11 v 'II r +I ' I 11 II 1 + 11` I I-- -4 MEGH./STOR.. 7 FmvWE AND WISTALL 412aNO, FALIosyTw:Jr1 yryFacm rOPU 4.5 REWIRED ESY PlAYONAL ELECTFq'. CCOF MEC1 NC F£ETRG TlE 1W0.111.17E4F9 XL Gor4FtI.45 .Gv€5 d 1+4Ewi oPeause NPICSTTEO. AtirALL :ueTCIES f ANzENTACLE5 DI Tlc FOLLC.SFAG MON S PeOvE .NIB., FLOCK SWruES...47. wners_Ia- i%I xYIEK.M�l6' 4,/ FUTURE BEPRM. 3 BASEMENT ELECTRICAL PLAN ifs- s I' -a• 4f1A sve Aw metNk eak wM. WM MM.m K Im ww veemaadwntm:abN .r Irma. lafL�w+Mh bn.. �q,6e a56p rmagnrril M[dna ra... nm 1.no . TknYe,eYuq gw10N,y Md.C6»woeio row o MMrk�tbw �ann,ryragMY.� 0 cw.w.fM..PF.- 175 CC tU 1- Q J -J h t(1 0 1- �n- 451 LA_7 F-3 LJ 1 E 3 z RAN NAME G15TOM _ PROJECT NUMBER 2014-022 SHEET NUMBER: i 5� ELEGTRIC4L KEY !(# G+IPLT_x COPPENINGE Cl1TLET 14 PJFLF% GVTLET Mon :.ciYT:EF I$ REATHERP(SO•F C11PLEE%CLI:1r IQ. GRAD E CW TER PLE%Ca76LEI I@ NALF.S.ATGtED CeR_Ex CWTLE1 14 SPECIAL Ram 4VTLEF • DyPLEx CVTLET W FLOOR I2,, 77✓. vt1.1- mILET FALL %UGH THREE -OAT SNCTCT FtARL•WAT woo: RREGSrAT siONGLe x.ILIN; I'1.`TNTE4) 1.1GANDESGEN1 LEW FI%TIAE NA3.I HOtOrrO WCANDEICEH? LENT WANE f :.ESINED NZANDEE EHT LENT FI TIRE LOW FI%1E NM F1LL 1 44 4 fEN ED MONO, BON ♦=. T.RA" FC LGHT FLLo1GE 1 LIENF PIX1o1FE EMPNAT FAN par., KAN+LC.Mi C D4AN TC yam. WTLET FOR0102.16611 LT'EIC Y GH11Es ON, R451ETTpY (Aulrew G alvez DETECTDR FELEPSGSE E ro.evlaim 0 THEN -Loom ▪ ELECTRIC NETER row ELECNbE PANEL HA -a EC0001ECI WIN R22.64.4 FAN CELTC FAN . ILIT rwpTOZO HIGAFcGAGENT LGHT PIPHAE AP RRI4111 FPR GEILP FM ▪ PENDAM LXaHT SF NSEgg r FWNTIJE AND NSTALL LC`JkIT CERFIFIED' F DEfF r^� A5. RWIREtr No',WO AL F1F PRL7TEG1IGN ASGGCIA1IF]N fN'PA1 AHD `£ETI{, NE RffI JIFEMEN15 ALL GC'E144,6 GODES. F&}r1DE ,ruo NStALL S AyL? A1EZTEL1 :aril 4s RAGWEED Err NATIONAL ELECTRIC 1CCE (HEG1 AND NEETNE HE REFafIREst'HT5 cP ALL GGNERRE GaE6 1 LK.SSS •Wn{F-15E ANL GATED. N5TAL1 5a1TflES / NAGF T4 L E. ar r1E n7LLONE E45wr5 A274E F1.1Fr4>_LOR 5Y6TCFES.—.41. ENTLEr5-16' TELEPl"nP_6' TEL_YISIM_W DINING KITGH'" PANTRY IVA NNE Rol AID1. KNELL TO K' fir. FF. GREAT RM. POR.H MAIN LEVEL ELEGTRIGAL PLAN M. BE0RM. GARAGE_-- EN. Wr 60.R HEATER t 5A5 ELEG. 1 VENT r H aa•-w••• wpn�sgwan b+.a A++N.tti �.W .wAe.mm re N..aTN dY.Ma wawo.. K. Fm Tnen . a.rrs6Ynn, asd+d R sex.tl m.111plornahmN¢wrV Ran 1N�n.R tNY.an .aoyybbd eays m .e aM myrrr4. cnwsF. e4t.Te 4ylWgnyH.^ eiresiuslan Mu. Omius.Mpr et Pm wwnarenamll.na lac mat Nta, Ana In anny. ID Learnt Hann irc 2 F IL 2 PLAN NAME 1 GVSTOM PROJECT NXALEft 2OI4 ,22 SHEUM ET H£ER i.� - 1 •WBVCrxrtax. roar OhENTO6pEor NET.. t Naar" HE rw4 Welet WOE 1 WLL ORE TO rc>'a nta Fe nHa Ttlogot w.CSr e 4,00 0 KITCHEN KITCHEN = E-o LAUNDRY KITCHEN FIREPLACE 12 ETA IL M. BATH BATH [6' TOP CCMN_'RCE aM 411a MECUM'. MN EOM m 611¢e4 4O14 4X.651•501-OTOO GMFATIV€HRCOG Swot doca.a. o muy.mmabeE r, Nwoa✓¢A OWn14.14. m Fn1.Feev e tiers e.rxaa.-Ni .nM ▪ mk“Alm .4ti6q 1.01.1,..r..FG 11mN w a.Yptl ofaemy. • macymwNaaear.y pylIM69 Or is VMS,l.mmKbF.w ▪ tea• g.Wur ayr wb s ab Lrw Fam.d 8 v 0 t. 2 1 Da PLAN NAME CUSTOM PRENSCT NUMBER 2014-022 SHEET NUMBER 7 OP Figure 5.3 : Neighborhood Conservation District South Twin Lake La MCK �i1 1 iG�' maws; .„ ■11111■ :1■■11 :�� i-i= il.I ►e■ .1 em _■ .= ■IIIIIII :1■111■ : m. I.�1 I i ■I _ ■1111■I: -■1■II 11 ...... - - �•--•�Im: 1 1 IIIIIIIII ;Eau .- li •.- -■ ._ -= .R .o - _.■/ .'w61 .I k. i 4-1 l1 II aVm':f � !■��*1 I ke �� ■1■ Ir °" 1111111 III! 1111111I r m a Lem 11111111•11■I! 1J -: ta view 11' •■fiIIIIIwIII! m---- plllla IAA0 ma _Vir4" I " X OWN: I urt • ik mum Ira 44/Nair.....10 pliF eav Irro fig/16 Itt.W INI i! •.O�I, I\III► � WilEk t.• '�``'llll 61. �`_ M A Ous lIIII/ dolma-��Q Long Lake 11E11 Nip rig i! 11111 .: ■.I■ Illlll i! _III_ -.. -IIII■1� -� 11111=111111 ■111111M EH ■111111111 111111 ...... _... IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII ■■1111M �� 1111111:11111 1111111■11i .tom �,. �•,�, 'may �� .1\� IIII■►� Oki `! uu■►r.S. Sr _� ■� III■1 MI■ II :o !!HJT!!! !'!:*rrt%.1111 o. w. till 1 Iii 11 Ili .= - e :■IIIILIIIIII■11111 mIIoili 11II1111111■ a r lim■■n immi. r— - i■1■1111 ii -•IVY 1111111■ ■..11■ _- _ =_ 3��. III __ ..— .. . ■� \. • = . 1��M■I� III■■: AIM g. •• �■ ■� 1■IIIIi I�1111 .� : un■n ■■nr=_=_:_� ■ ■ ii.uni inili 111111■ ■IIII� THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA -' Neighborhood Conservation District 2008 Comprehensive Plan 800 0 800 1,600 Feet L.._..J 2030 City Limit Right -of -Way Open Water Neighborhood Conservation District 01r Bonestroo August 5, 2008 I:/510/51007001/gis/maps/conservation district.mxd PLAN OF STILLWATER 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Chapter 5 : Historic Resources 5-8 Figure 5.2 : Neighborhood Architectural Survey C N'tamdmill ei Milli 111■111:p�i iv■��■41,*BMW ,i11". pn` gib gi, �i :Iri�;�,�� IC;an mar !Iti ll.. IINiir EIS • I h laritinfit , r I A OW j� /ralC 'hl'/// 111111111 :11111P E • 19AliEliWdmil limn 0:...imam1=r 1 i nnm -n■n ,s . = r: P4Ill1 111111111 :loon 1� .. , ■I�1�I� �mm m■■n O j -1�; II4 :■■MI r- . -O� I� Ip unm�: �I�rJ=6� i Iljlp =� 1/111111 -,_.�..■-.e non■ 11■nnl. _ tall F 1 r-1_ I �,�,Ir :111■� i;l. giJGS e■ u , IIIIIIu1� 1111 II. Pi • ir0 �� .7 G■111111._. _ .11■r r•� �- II■/11111111/ II�j1�11E_I?I911r��1�� 111 �av `V�� 1 I.■ IIIIIII!IIII1 1IIIIII ■1■1111- \��\�J �IIIIIII;I■11 11111111111� y 1�\ II �� IIII :IIIIIIIII!Im i3O��57,6711iniallits t, _ r" 2I!1�■dE%1E11.1111111■i 111�■/IG ► �� • \V��V•� nnll nlig IL:iiim.n1 n■11■: + . •:�� , ,, .-.:. u■ _-Bunn ■■■n■ '•10N�.�\411 tt■ _■hiM■ Ni��'�\�� s. ■■ .. Imam El no mini go mg -■111 ��\I11 am Ili ■■■11■ _M mr a llUit.katktgAte1 etW R iok E■ I' :111:1i1= PP VI �w' 66 _��= NM PI _ == 11Imor u. II. pra 1111111i II■1111 t 11■1I1= — EN _1H A111111/11 = lIIId11 ell J ■M i _� kel mo niu cStillwater 1HE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA Neighborhood Architectural Survey 2008 Comprehensive Plan 800 0 s 800 1,600 Feet L••_••; 2030 City Limit Right -of -Way Open Water A, Dutchtown Addition B, Carli and Schulenburg Addition C, Staples and Mays Addition D, North Hill (Original Town) E, Greeley Addition F, South Hill G, Holcombe Addition H, West Half of the Churchill, Nelson, Slaughter Addition I, East Half of the Churchill, Nelson, Slaughter Addition J, Hersey Staples Addition '4 Bonestroo August 5, 2008 I:/51 0/51 007001 /gis/maps/architectural survey.mxd PLAN OF STILLWATER 0 MMMIIIMMMMMIUMMMMMUMMIIIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIMMMIIIMMIIIMMMMMM Chapter 5 : Historic Resources 5-6 tI 1 iwater H E 6 r MH i A 1: o ?ANNE 4 0 f A HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: February 3, 2014 APPLICANT: REQUEST: CASE NO.: DP/2014-19 Ernie Shores, representative, A'Salonna Salon & Spa Request for a Design Permit for a wall sign and a projecting sign for A'Salonna Salon & Spa located at 221 (225) Chestnut Street East ZONING: Commercial Business District COMP PLAN DISTRICT: Downtown Mixed Use PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Design Permit for one wall sign and one projecting sign to be located at 221 (225) Chestnut Street East. The unlit wall sign, proposed to encompass the existing 110 square foot sign area, does not conform with the existing zoning regulations of one square foot per one linear foot of business frontage. While this business had a 110 square foot sign in this location, the sign was illegally installed and never received design approval by the HPC. The applicant is proposing a high-density foam letters to be stud mounted to the board. The area of the lettering is consistent with the zoning regulations. The 3.2 square foot (24" square), circular projecting sign will be hung from a new aluminum bracket. The acrylic sign is proposed to be framed in aluminum. The applicant is requesting the sign be internally lit. APPLICABLE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS One hanging sign, no greater than six square feet, is permitted per business in the CBD. The sign ordinance further indicates projecting signs must be visible from the sidewalk and not be a hazard to pedestrians. If lighted, the sign must be externally lit. The provisions for external 221 Chestnut Street East Case No. DP/2014-19 (HPC: June 2, 2014) Page 1 of 2 i11water illumination are found within the zoning ordinance as well as the Downtown Design Review standards. Wall signs are permitted by the sign ordinance at a ratio of one square foot per one linear foot of the structure, parallel to a lot line. The Downtown Design Manual indicates the following guidelines for projecting signs: The maximum area of the sign and the minimum height above the sidewalk is regulated by the sign ordinance. Use materials consistent with the period, such as wood signboards and metal brackets. The Manual further indicates: Materials: Modern sign materials are acceptable provided their design is handled with an understanding of the Victorian spirit. Shape: Design the sign shape to fit and fill the available space. Consider using long narrow signs spanning the full width of the facade. Color: Choose tones with sufficient contrast to be clearly legible: dark on light or light on dark. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval DP/2014-19 with the following condition: 1. The frame of the wall sign shall be made of wood and painted cream, to match existing facade elements of the structures, with a wood trim painted black. 2. The painted dimensional foam letters, with optional logo, shall not exceed 21.5 square feet in size. 3. The projecting sign shall not be internally lit. 4. All major revisions to the approved plan shall be reviewed and approved by the HPC. ATTACHMENTS Applicant Submission (3 pages) 221 Chestnut Street East Case No. DP/2014-19 (HPC: June 2, 2014) Page 2 of 2 DiMensional sign to replacc cxistini silent are*. Hhh ensit3 (HUD) foam letters, stud mounted. Approved Date Signed Date Required Deposit 15207 N 63rd St. Stillwater, MN 55082 651.206.8025 todd@stcroixsign.com SL Cn rr1 x Estimate is good for 30 days. Banners, coro signs & orders under 300 require payment at the time of order. All other projects will start with 50% down, balance due on delivery or before installation. Drawings are the property of St Croix Sign until paid in full or rights for design is paid for. Banners will take 6 to 8 business days, custom signs will take 15 to 25 business days. ASA' ONNA o n & S p q Approved Date Signed Date Required Deposit Pati Dirduiskei Foam sales_ UT Spacers 15207 N 63rd St. Stillwater, MN 55082 651.206.8025 todd@stcroixsign.com SL Cn_Z; X 1r Estimate is good for 30 days. Banners, coro signs & orders under 300 require payment at the time of order. All other projects will start with 50% down, balance due on delivery or before installation. Drawings are the property of St Croix Sign until paid in full or rights for design is paid for. Banners will take 6 to 8 business days, custom signs will take 15 to 25 business days. Mantint sign with aluminum bracket painted to match foto color. Sip shape built out of aluminum and faces of acrylic. Would like to have small number of LEDs inside of can to rive the It a slitht flow. Not (ookint fora brit htly lit face but again a slight glow. Brithtness could be adjusted to comply with su Approved Date Signed stions. Date Required Deposit N 15207 N 63rd St. Stillwater, MN 55082 651.206.8025 todd@stcroixsign.com SL C' Y Estimate is good for 30 days. Banners, coro signs & orders under 300 require payment at the time of order. All other projects will start with 50% down, balance due on delivery or before installation, Drawings are the property of St Croix Sign until paid in full or rights for design is paid for. Banners will take 6 to 8 business days, custom signs will take 15 to 25 business days. S:\Planning\Commissions\HPC\Staff Updates\20140804 - Staff Updates.doc HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING DATE: August 4, 2013 REGARDING: Staff Updates PREPARED BY: Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner NAPC AWARD On July 19th City staff accepted the National Alliance of Preservation Commission’s 2014 Commission Excellence Aware for the HPC’s public education efforts. As a reminder, the award was given for the Heirloom Homes program as well as the new Downtown Walking Tour. Given the attention to the Heirloom Homes site, staff would like to seek grant funds to update the site to enable to the City to better manage the program. RESIDENTIAL WALKING TOUR As the Commission is aware, Dan Hoisington presented final products at the Commission’s last regularly-scheduled meeting in July. Since that time, all videos were uploaded for your review and staff has received all final products. We will be working on finalizing all grant materials for the SHPO and sending off within the coming weeks. As a part of the reimbursement request, certain forms need to be signed by Commissioners. Staff will have these available at the meeting for signature. Once the grant is finalized, staff will be uploading the files to the City’s website as well as the City’s YouTube site. We will also work on scheduling an open house viewing as well a possible invite-only owner’s release. Most recently staff was approached by the CVB about incorporation of the walking tour(s) in their 2015 guidebook. The guidebook will be developed October through December for 2015 printing and distribution. HISTORIC DISTRICTS FAQ In April staff presented a draft FAQ about historic districts in Stillwater. An updated version is attached for the Commission’s review. While some links are embedded, more will continually be added as the content is put onto the City’s website. Staff anticipates having this information on the website within the coming months. While the HPC is not anticipating the designation of any local districts in 2014, there is the opportunity to make this FAQ available to the public before any further progress is made on local designations. BERGSTEIN REUSE STUDY RFP Staff is finalizing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Bergstein Warehouse and Shoddy Mill Reuse Study and will be distributing the RFP the first week in August. As a reminder to the Commission, the HPC was awarded a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant for the project. While the project is slightly behind schedule, the project will still be in compliance with the grant program schedule.