Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-10-05 CC Agenda PacketZoom Meeting Participant ID: 372215 Q ® Recording... 11 • r. Stillwater Conference Room City Clerk, Beth Wolf Tim Gladhill Brad Glynn TN E• BIRTHPLACE' OF M I N,N.E»S•OTA J1 Le IT Alerts Tim Gladhill Cam Murray ITI �/ •i7 © m0 ®+ Join Audio Start Video Security Participants Share Screen Pause/Stop Recording Reactions u• P Type here to search Q gii 111f in 0 X Participants (7) C. (Co -host, me, participant ID: 372215) e ilk IT Alerts (Host) O a a 0 0 o 01 Yf o' I0 I co AV Brad Glynn Cam Murray Stillwater Conference Room Tim Gladhill Invite Mute All ^ 4 442PM 10/5/2021 2021 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearing October 5, 2021 2021 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LEGEND MILL AND OVERLAY RECONSTRUCT (THIII Sf ■I 1 6. CR EEKSIDE CIR. CREEKSIDE CRSI NG. CR EEKSIDE CT. EAGLE RIDGE CIR. EAGLE RIDGE CRSNT EAGLE RIDGE CT. EAGLE RIDGETRL. LECUYER DR. LECUYER CIR LECUYER CT. THORENE PL. 'WALNUT CREEK DR, AUTUMN WAY EAYBERRY AVE. COTTONWOOD CT. 1 EDGEWOOD CT. EDGEWOOD DR. FAIRLAWN AVE. I NTE R LACH E N CT. I NTE RLACH E N DR. I NTERLACHEN WAY NARYK NOLL DR. MID OAKS AVE. NIGHTINGALE BLVD. NORTHLAND DR: PINERIDGE LN. TAMARACK CT. ■ r 1 1 111. ‚tip 111171A00 MOWN MIKA r*r 0 C IL gri Project Schedule Authorization of Feasibility Study Neighborhood meetings Feasi . ility Study Pu• is Hearing prove Plans/Authorize Bid Accept Bids/Award Contract Construction Cost Declaration Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 December 2020 February 02, 2021 February 16, 2021 March 2, 2021 April 6, 2021 May - October, 2021 September 7,2021 October 5, 2021 Project Update •••• 422 properties on the project ••• • 4.66 miles of street work ❖ 1.26 miles of reconstruct + 3.40 miles of mill and overlay As of 10/5/21 about 80% of the work is completed. Major remaining items are scheduled: • Maryknoll base layer of pavement 10/ 1 1 /2021. • Mid Oaks base layer of pavement 10/12/2021. • Eagle Ridge are second layer of pavement 10/13- 14/2021. • Maryknoll sidewalk installation 10/12-13/2021 • Maryknoll restoration 10/18-20/2021 • Mid Oaks second pavement layer 10/19/2021. • Traffic circles and second layer of pavement on Maryknoll early summer of 2022 Project Costs Construction Costs $1,777,671.31 Engeering/Admin. $ 318,191 ToaI Project Costs $2,095,862.31 .00 Preliminary and Proposed Final Unit Assessment Comparison rType Preliminary Final Assessment Appraised Benefit Value Assessment Rate Assess Units Assessment Amount Estimated Assessment Mill and Overlay — Without Sidewalk $2,231 52,340.5 53,000 Unit 260.5 $608,530 Mill and Overlay — With Sidewalk 53,012 52,854 53,500 Unit 49 S 139,846 Trail- City Cost r � 552,850 Mill and Overlay - City Property $23.17 $24.14 LF 902 $21,774 Partial Reconstruct $5971 $5,573 $6,000 Unit 55 $306,515 Reconstruction (Mid Oaks N) $9,320 $8,355 $10,000 Unit 11 $91,905 Reconstruction (Maryknoll Drive _ $8,967 $8,743 $9,000 Unit 42 $367,206 Assessment Total $1,514,385 City Share • $581,520 Total Street Improvement $2,095,905 • The final assessment amount is the lower of the actual calculated assessment or the appraised benefit to the property • No objections were received. Assessment Method ❖ Unit method is used for all residential properties. ❖ Residential corner lots are assessed 0.5 units per side improved ❖ City properties are assessed per lineal foot of frontage according to City policy. Maryknoll Drive assessed properties Mid Oak Avenue North assessed properties a N� 2564 N [v 2570 %// / ▪ r 2576 w n`� 2577 '46 Luz �°� 2582 �� < 2581 62 • �`� L �4' 2588 2587 78 67 3 2657 ❑▪ ' 6' 2592 2591 94 �� "'‘s 2595 \2593 2647 �' Av ‘4 2637 `Cd ry 1ej 2597 126 tyre � 'E nw n /'✓ 7 ry6 n, 166 N gyp^ ry 176 177 N ti N • m r n n 2: 186 ▪ 183 N 3 _ o 4 x O O 0 M O CO CO0 0 0 196 LE -193 N N , u0 N INTERLACHEN N 302 200 220 Z44, ti 211 2565 � r m CVC b _ N N 112 // 206 308 301 208 Q 314 00 307 ✓ o N us 313 y A P 0 ..� 4 319 CCURT 325 n 402 401 408 407 V 414 413 420 419 ME w z 425 2426 F n 7 Lu 2422 212 204 Assessments rr! .5 Unit 1 Unit 160 �zq j'Fq 1 �. 2320 170 c���120 �� x 2390 .. 180 �.� 2240 301 2200 /� q�7{AVENUE 211 6.42 V 721 . 5221 240 0 243 250 z 253 a 260 263 270 O 0 0 m CO CO M N N N CO 273 9 230. 231 240 250 241 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 Cr, CO N N N N N N N INTERLACHEN 302 301 303 210 209 302 301 304 p 305 10 303 hnn 306 m 307 303 S z 214 301 7 302 303 3000 a , $ 8 , f16 314 r, 4 `>:� n Ran 304 305 310 397 g 406 w 1R��A0°6 2 405 306 397 312 1:6 F� 406 Q 409 41 ❑ 2307 41 402 405 404 a 412 u WEL EL 415 i 2324 p 2316 cL 420 4 421 4; 22 Assessments �.5 Unit 1 Unit $4,177.5 $8,35 7030 7010 7079 7055 C 1 4 E . gle Ridge Trail a ea ssessed properties $5,573 $2,786.5 CO 2138 1238 1239 7" 2 2127 Cs.1 N 1226 1227 . `. 'R 214 1215 1241 �c, 1240 .:. 1221 V .200 1201 1180 • ui. 1191 / 1160 // 1102 101 162 4 GO// 1068 ( � 1039 ///// P• 1627 1003 1025 7930 /, 1171 1120 1151 Assessments �� .5 Unit 1 Unit 1131 1101 1121 1041 1031 1021 1028 `o-o / .°1. ,,o/c, / ccF tea''' SO 1011 1015 /// / N' / 902 1001 935 ,0❑ 906 903 44,E 921 910 w 907 920 915 ❑_ 920 796G 930 910 90T 900 911 810 875 w 927 '..-1.-' 900 r 895 :In' 881 820 w 845 871 840 EAGLE —GE LANE zc 7939 820 • •_ "# oT 7O7 s62 807 811 821 801 825 786 *SS 781 'fMp# • 831 841 M 771. 835 774 Q 761 851 855 851 741 731 711 Mill & Overlay With Sidewalk - assessed properties $1,427 14 110 105 0 Z 7, r-c `` "j 120 11 5 22? 7 - 130 U..r • 125 128 LVSr �\ .140 13E 122 'y 2347 150 122 1,Es 1E0 155 144. 137 170 -- 165 ' 1E8 0 147 _ 130 :' 175 158 w. 157 176 177 mo 1-37 0 r 193 ;' 185 132 185 0 103 fJf�J'` 1 . '7 �f / 92 m' = O // Pm 15E 7193 N INTERLACHEN DRIVE -1 . 4 -- 20 4 20 3' 2833 y�r a 20 6 n, N N N '�V 53 - 212 217 2875 26- 220 w 219 - 2 0 w 227 > 2659 304 d 363 312 320 444' 412 311 31 9 2667' 2651 327 f_13 28t4 403 129 220 362 - 4 303 301 $2,85414 _.3 rn ___ rn w o N CQURT a f 402 2641 A w 307 313 319 325 401 2570 25_{ 254E 2C z �c" z 2577 2532 2E31 2E 88 25 37 78 12 - W O7 0 Y, CV 31 •23 2: 1333 ..• .., . �4k X 1t.A .._. s 17. I 2 Assessments MnO with Sidewalk .5 Unit 1 Unit 2n1 """ 2u1 2E92 2591 94 9' 220 AVENUE 211 220 n 2596 2E93 112 1 / 221 k 221 109 m 2597 128 G. 0 22 k / 231 240 ❑" -- •- 127 NC 23 230 . ` I 250 r' 4• 143 250 z 2E3. 24ff 241 23C 271 15.9 a .253 ,P L`1 260 262 C_. 261 C, • 271 m r 17' Ln 2E01 276 273 266 N `� 139 c. /'147. c7 cNiCO 0 M N DR[VE INTERL#CHEN r-- cti 'i N 211 2Ca 203 '1 . I 206 26 - ' l { J 20.7 231 JLiE INTERLACHEN DRFVE c. 2501 _ I 71 _-F t� I 411. 1., a7 1 20 ni 47 N7 / / I KV .- C. 2C2 .. {y C7 - N 2,02 1 S@3 21 0 20 9 3132 . 2.04._ 044 305 316 ~- • C •30c . ^ 212 211 3 F- 1S 367 r) �. 303. C 21''16 f- *' 4 21 ; 201 300 W . 0 2213 5 t-p1R4� 305 • 70 302 O 203 3C8Zi .,_. 316 ' � 4C5 2117 204 c., 200 al 307 00 406 211` 'II Mill & Overlay Without Sidewalk - assessed properties $2,34 7 748 756 764 800 898 642 656 626 61B 634 616 0 •/� °w 615 / / 643 647 650 760 .� 708 '• 716 ▪ J0Jy / 7fj1� G. 799 724 Qv 659 732 Az, 717 733 40 �? 01 725 SV m m ti 03 N 815 816 r2 825 832 824 �ss Y02 1010 1018 1926 1034 $24.1402 1110 Park 1130 651 655 cP . .k Syo,o0c) rw a� 1011 1019 1027 1035 1103 1111 1517 1125 1131 G / / z 606 7 612 6-18 624 2862 N 33 NORTHLAN❑ N 691 607 613 319 Assessments Lineal Feet 1 Unit .5 Unit 625 631 701 707 713 719 2651 26 2652 2653 801 807 813 152 !V 3 e N ;v - N m C,REENMEADOW N C6 4ti CO 2647 .2612 2618 `g.• ` P� 819 901 >.,P,N• a 1D 909 a� . oa Aa a 1, 915 •2648 �1 NQn V 71 921 '0 918 2654 924 927 930 FZ�0,ND � 1001 2660 t `�Gcc, 1007 2666 2624 M N 2600 2606 = 1cr ° 26 26 936 954 942 94$ 1608 101 16193 267 1914 cap Park 262 2636 S D 2 • am 2642 7 1018 1026 1932 1100 1025 12 $24.1 12975 5- $�1y; 17Q }. 113 O ti 113 185 Ise' / INTERLACHEI:• ❑PINE 211 2I•73 229 219 w _ 223 J 237 c1 234 a 502 312 42 211 212 227 433 423 411 $ 4' 412 427 718 331 ' 22 2P44 2577 Ul 2500 2'37 :8 2„.5.2 2891 31 v3 2.3Z22 112 2 109 m.,2es7 12= S` 127 VTERLA CHEN r. 4i 211 9S 302 .208 331 213 177 4. N ▪ s } Y 2 712 _..�np, _GIRT e1 ' .p a Ia =1= m n1 wag ry _ 423 - 41E. 2'EO �,. 9 45 �2 531 rV 533 �437 2?qc 33 253 2E4 a N K 514 CRLXXWCCO 0WLE144 Ro k n 8 z a 315 V= 433 431 4- 412 21 2 31 47 Y q3 143 1' 5 172 139 197 DRIVE 201 2➢3 235 13339 M21 182 2330 1c.7 . 1' 2242 tea 3 173 ` e397 . 18 M49 2290 332 233 221D 243 25 3 249 253 c 23 2 23 2•3 2°3 273 0 o c o N 33 33 33 8 732 2J7 213 A9 30-2-w�:l �c 3 2 9340 20:. 7-0 33-12G :.93 298 g 6.. 310 11 333 31❑ � 220 6, N 731 INTI 3] 1 u'1 x aG Assessments MnO without Sidewalk %j .5 Unit 1 Unit Lineal Feet Mill & Overlay without Sidewalk -assessed properties 8270 8262 1230 8260 2 z9, � m 72T6 �2r2 8226 Assessments .5 Unit 1 Unit Lineal Feet 2440 /// c c No W 2412 1206 N cc'v N 2266 )87 ._,. EAGLE RIDGE TR EAGLE RIDGE TRAIL 2418 gFF 1200 1205 /� 2359 m M m m CO N. 12 - N N CV °e cr l 1201 81E0 a / N nN. 8077 • 2419 o 2 o 0 2280 • ni N N C7V 1 1141 c �c, N 2260 8120 WALNUT CREEK DRIVE I 1140 1131 8055 1134 1111 ../� m 1190 1201 / •i -- -- - 1128 .4--C 2 8080 s-... w 1170 1175 TI cn 1109 8Q75 1122 eC 110J1155 8045 •_ -;16 8040 031 1130 11351105 / 1110 11i5 i 1 10 1104 wp 1103 8000 8Q05 c 1276424.14 %� U 7990 1095 . 7979 Y O Z 12840 // 12997 996 7939 7919 Assessments 1 Unit cso 83 2257 77 2255 75 2253 73 2247 2245 2243 I.7 Special assessments City Funds Project Total ApportionmentCost Cost $1,514,341.93 $581,520.38 $2,095,682.31 Payment Information ❖ Pay partial or whole amount by November 15th, 2021 ❖ Balance as of November 15th, 2021 added to tax statement at 2.55% interest rate ❖ Payment term: 10 years $5,000 Assessment- 2.55% simple interest, 10-year term Year Principal Interest Total 1 j $5000.00 $127.50 $627.50 2/ $4500.00 $114.75 $614.75 6 $2500.00 $63.75 $563.75 10 $500.00 $12.75 $512.75 Recommendations ❖ Conduct Public Hearing on the proposed assessments. ••• Adopt final assessment roll. Change the finance rate from 2.95% to 2.55% annually. Daniel Ciro 1041 Lecuyer Dr Stillwater, MN 55082 10/05/2021 To the city of Stillwater, I am submitting this letter as notice that I object to the proposed special assessment being levied against my property as part of the 2021 street improvement project. The reasons for my objection are listed as follows. 1) The city of Stillwater, and all cities in the state of Minnesota, are prohibited from placing a special assessment against a property unless the value of the property increases as a result of the project being assessed by as much as, or more than, the amount of the special assessment. -This rule is further laid out in legal precendent set by Minnesota Supreme Court case First Baptist Church of St. Paul, et. al. vs. City of St. Paul. 2) Replacing the existing paved asphalt street with curb and gutter on Lecuyer Dr, with a new asphalt street with curb and gutter of the same width, does not increase the value of an individual residential property. -Through the analysis of a Uniform Residential Appraisal Report, one can see that there is only one factor used in the appraisal of a home when it comes to determining the market value of a home. That factor is whether the street is public or private. In the comparitive market analysis used by appraisers, it does not even make mention of the street. -A blank Uniform Residential Appraisal Report is attached to this letter. Given the above arguments, I am requesting that no special assessment be made against my property located at 1041 Lecuyer Dr Stillwater, MN 55082. Sincerely, Daniel 1 Ciro Uniform Residential Appraisal Report File # The purpose of this summary appraisal report is to provide the lender/client with an accurate, and adequately supported, epinbn of the market value of the subject property. Properly Address City State Zip Code Borrower Owner of Public Record County Legal Description c Assessor's Parcel # Tax Year A.E. Taxes $ eNeighborhood Name Map Reference Census Tract u Occupant © Owner [j Tenant © Vacant Special Assessments $ ❑ PUD HOA$ ❑ per year ❑par month Properly Rights Appraised ❑ Fee Simple 0 Leasehold ❑ Dlher (describe) t Assignment Type ❑ Purchase Transaction ❑ Refinance Transaction 0 Other (describe) LenderlClient Address Es the subject properly currently offered for sale or has it been offered for sale in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal? ❑ Yes ❑ No Report data sources) used, offering price(s), and dele(s), I ❑ did 0 did not analyze the contract for sale for the subject purchase transaction. Explain the results ol the analysis of the contract forsaie or why the analysis was not r. • • darmed. 0 H T Contract Price $ Date of Contract Is the property seller the e erof public record? ❑Yes [)No Data Source(s) a Is there any financial assistance (loan charges, sale concessions. gift or downpayment assistance, etc.) to be paid by any party on behalf of the borrower? 0 Yes 0 No c If Yes, :• . Ihetotal dotter amount and descrbe the terns to be paid T Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal !actors. Neighborhood Characto ris1 ics One -Unit Housing Trends One -Unit Housing Preeent Land Use % k Location ❑ Urban © Suburban © Rural Property Values 0 Increasing ❑ Stable 0 Declinhg PRICE AGE One -Unit r% e Binh -Up ❑ Over 75% 0 25-75% El Under 25% DerreindfSupply 0 Shortage 0 In Balance 0 Over Supply $ (000) (yrs) 2-4 Unit Stu ,; Growth ❑ Rapid 0 Stable JJ Slow Marketing Time 0 Under3 mths ❑ 3-6 mths 0 Over 6 mths Low Muhl Family % Neighborhood Boundaries High Commercial % o Peed Other, n Neighborhood Description 0 0 0 Market Conditions (including support for the above conclusions) Dimensions Area Shape View Specific Zoning Ciassi#icetion Zoning Description Zoning Compliance 0 Legal ❑ Legal Nanaonformng (Grendtalhered Use) ❑ No zoning ❑ Illegal (describe) I the highest and best use of the subject properly as improved (or as proposed per plans and specilbalio is) the present use? 0 Yes 0 No If No, describe Uliihfes Pub Other (describe) Public Other (describe) Off -site Improvements --Type Public Private r Electricity 0 ❑ Water 0 0 Street 0 ❑ Gas © 0 Sanitary Sewer ❑ ❑ Alley 0 ❑ FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area 0 Yes 0 No FEMA Flood Zone FEMA Map # FEMA Map Date Are the utilities and off -site improvements typical for the market area? 0 Yes 0 No If No. describe Are there any adverse site conditions or external factors (easements, encroachments, environmental conditions, land uses, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Yes, describe Goners} Description Foundation ExlerlorDescription meterlalslcondltlon Interior materials/condition Lies 0 One 0 Ore Wth Accessory Lire 0 Concrete Slab 0 Crawl Space Foundation Walls Floors i of Stories 0 Full Basement ❑ Partial Basement Exterior Walls Walls Type ❑ Det. ❑ Atl. 0 S-DetiEnd Unit Basement Area sq.11. Roof Surface TriniVFiilsh ❑ Existigg ❑ Proposed ❑ Under Cortst, Basement Finish % Gutters & Downspouts Bath Floor Design (Style) 0 Outside Entry/Exl1 0 Sump Pump Window Type Bath Wainscot Year Built Evidence of 0 Infestation Stove Sash/Insulated Car Storage 0 None Effective Age (Yrs) ❑ Dampness ❑ Settlement Screens ❑ Driveway # of Cars Attic ❑ None Heatiy © FWA D HWBB 0 Hadar' Arne ales ❑ Woodstove(s) # Driveway Surface ❑ Drop Stair ❑ Stairs 0 other I Fuel ❑ Flraphace(s) # ❑ Fence ❑ Garage # of Cars 0 Floor ❑ Scuttle Cooling 0 Central Air Cnndltiorurtg ❑ Patio/Deck 0 Porch ❑ Carport # of Cars P ❑ Finished 0 Heated 0 Individual ID Other r❑ Pool 0 Other 0 Att. 0 Det. ❑ Built-in a Appliances ❑Retrigerslor :Marge/Oven ❑Dishwasher ['Disposal ❑#lcrowave ❑WasherlDryer ❑Other (describe) Finished area above grade contains: Rooms Bedrooms Balti(s) Square Feet of Gross Living Area Above Grade u Additional features (special energy efficient carols, etc.) t H T Descnbe the condition of the properly (including needed repairs, deterioration, renovations, remodeling, etc.). Are there any physical deficiencies or adverse condtions that affect the livability, soundness, or structural integrity of the property? 0 Yes 0 No If Yes, describe Dees the properly generally conform to the neighborhood (functional ullMy, style, ceridlio n, use, conslrucilon, etc.)? 0 Yes 0 No If No, describe Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 Page 1 of 6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Uniform Residential Anoraisal Report File t There are comparable properties currently offered for sale in the subject neighborhood ranging in price from 5 to $ There are comparable sales in the subject neighborhood within the past Twelve months ranging in sale price from $ to $ FEATURE I SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE # 1 COMPARABLE SALE # 2 COMPARABLE SALE # 3 Address Proximity to Subject Sale Price $ $ Sale Price/Gross Liv. Area $ sq. ft. $ sq. ft. :$ sq. ft. $ sq. ft. Data Sources) Verification Source(s) 1 VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +(-)$Adjustment DESCRIPTION +(-) $ Adjustment DESCRIPTION +(-) $ Adjustment Sale or Financing Concessions Date of Sale/Tme Location Leasehold/Fee Simple Site View Design (Style) Quality of Construction Actual Age Condition Above Grade Room Count Gross Living Area Total Bdnns baths Told Bdmrs Baths Total BdTms Baths Total Bdmrs Baths sq. ft sq. ft. sqft. sq. ft. Basement & Finished Rooms Below Grade Functional Utility HeatinglCooling aEnergy Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck A 0 6 Net Adjustment (Total) ❑ + ❑ - $ 0 + ❑ • $ 0 + 0 - $ A Adjusted Sale Price P ofComparables Net Adj. % Gross Ad. % $ Net Adj. % GrossAdj. % $ Net Adj. To GrossAdl. % $ R I © iftcl 0 did not research the sale or Iransfe history of the subject property and comparable sales. If not. explain 0 A c H My research 0 did 0 did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the subject property for the three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal. Data source(s) My research ❑ did 0 did not reveal any prior sales or transfers of the comparable sales for the year prior to the date of sale of the comparable sale. Data sources) Report the results of the research and analysis of the prior sale or transfer history of the subject property and comparable sales (remit additional prier sales on page 3). ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE # 1 COMPARABLE SALE # 2 COMPARABLE SALE # 3 Date of Prior Sale/Transfer Price of Prior Sale/Transfer Data Source(s) Effective Dale of Lute Source(s) Analysis of prior sale or transler history of the subject properly and comparable sales Summary of Sales Comparison Approach Indicated Value by Sales Comparison Approach $ Indicated Value by: Sales Comparison Approach S Cost Approach (if developed) S Income Approach (If developed) $ R c 0 H This appraisal is made 0 "as is", 0 subject to completion per plans and specifications on the basis of a hypothetical condition that the improvements have been L corepleted, ❑ subject to the following repairs or alterations on the basis of a hypothetical condition that the repairs or alterations have been completed, or ❑ subject to the r !dewing required Inspection based on the extraordinary assumption that the condition or deficiency does not regaire alteration or repak: A r 6 Based on a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property, defined scope of work, statement conditions, and appraiser's certification, my (our) opinion of the market value, as defined, of the real property that is the subject $ , as of , which is the date of inspection and the effective date of this appraisal. of assumptions and limiting of this report is Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 Page 2 of 6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Uniform Residential Appraisal Report File A A 0 0 T 1 0 ti A L C 0 M E N r s COST APPROACH TO VALUE (not required by Fannie Mae) Provide adequate information for the lender/client to replicate the below cost figures and calculations. Support for the opinion of site value (summary of comparable land sales or other methods tor estimating site value) 0 ESTIMATED ❑ REPRODUCTION OR ❑ REPLACEMENT COST NEW OPINION OF SITE VALUE .. = $ Source of cost data Dwelling Sq. Ft. @ $ =$ Quality rating from cost service Effective date of cost data Sq. Ft. © $ = =$ F Comments on Cost Approach (gross living area calculations, depreciati❑rr, otc.) r n 9 �Sq. Garage/Carport e/Ca rt Ft. @ $ A Total Estimate of Cost -New _ $ s Ni Less Physical Functional External Depreciation =$( Depreciated Cost of Improvements. ........ .......... ........... .... ............. =$ "As -is" Value of Site Improvements =$ Estimated Remaining Economic Life (HUD and VA only) Years Indicated Value By Cost Approach ........:_$ 1 INCOME APPROACH TO VALUE (not required by Fannie Mae) N c Estimated Monthly Market Rent a X Gross Rent Multiplier = $ Indicated Value by Income Approach ° Summary of Income Approach (including support for market rent and GRM) r PROJECT INFORMATION FOR PUDs (if applicable) is the developer/builder in control of the Homeowners' Association (HOA)? 0 Yes ❑ No Unit type(s) ❑ Detached 0 Attached v Provide the following information for PUDs ONLY if the devalopedbuikter is in control of the HOA and the subject property is an attached dwelingunit. u Legal name of project ' Total number of phases Total number of units Total number of units sold Total number of units rented Total number of units for sale Data source(s) Was the propel created by the conversion of an existing building(s) into a PUD? 0 Yes ❑ No II Yes, date of conversion q Does the project contain any motif -dwelling units? ❑ Yes 0 No Data source(s) ,r Are the units, Coaenon elements, and recreation facilities complete? ❑ Yes 0 No If No, describe the status of completion. T . Are the common elements leased to or by the Homeowners Association? ❑ Yes 0 No II Yes, describe the rental terms and options. IDescribe common elements and recreational facilities Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 • Page 3of6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Uniform Residential Appraisal Report FIIe# This report form is designed to report an appraisal of a one -unit property or a one -unit property with an accessory unit; including a unit in a planned unit development (PUD). This report form is not designed to report an appraisal of a manufactured home or a unit in a condominium or cooperative project. This appraisal report is subject to the following scope of work, intended use, intended user, definition of market value, statement of assumptions and limiting conditions, and certifications. Modifications, additions, or deletions to the intended use, intended user, definition of market value, or assumptions and limiting conditions are not permitted. The appraiser may expand the scope of work to include any additional research or analysis necessary based on the complexity of this appraisal assignment. Modifications or deletions to the certifications are also not permitted. However, additional certifications that do not constitute material alterations to this appraisal report, such as those required by law or those related to the appraiser's continuing education or membership in an appraisal organization, are permitted. SCOPE OF WORK: The scope of work for this appraisal is defined by the complexity of this appraisal assignment and the reporting requirements of this appraisal report form, including the following definition of market value, statement of assumptions and limiting conditions, and certifications. The appraiser must, at a minimum: (1) perform a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property, (2) inspect the neighborhood, (3) inspect each of the comparable sales from at least the street, (4) research, verify, and analyze data from reliable public and/or private sources, and (5) report his or her analysis, opinions, and conclusions in this appraisal report. INTENDED USE: The intended use of this appraisal report is for the lender/client to evaluate the property that is the subject of this appraisal for a mortgage finance transaction. INTENDED USER: The intended user of this appraisal report is the lender/client. DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he or she considers his or her own best interest; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U. S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions* granted by anyone associated with the sale. *Adjustments to the comparables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are necessary for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the appraiser's judgment. STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The appraiser's certification in this report is subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: 1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title to it, except for information that he or she became aware of during the research involved in performing this appraisal. The appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and will not render any opinions about the title 2. The appraiser has provided a sketch in this appraisal report to show the approximate dimensions of the improvements. The sketch is included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property and understanding the appraiser's determination of its size. 3. The appraiser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or other data sources) and has noted in this appraisal report whether any portion of the subject site is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. 4. The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand, or as otherwise required by law. 5. The appraiser has noted in this appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property or that he or she became aware of during the research involved in performing this appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in this appraisal report, the appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent physical deficiencies or adverse conditions of the property (such as, but not limited to, needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmental conditions, etc.) that would make the property less valuable, and has assumed that there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or warranties, express or implied. The appraiser will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because the appraiser is not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, this appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property. 6. The appraiser has based his or her appraisal report and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations on the assumption that the completion, repairs, or alterations of the subject property will be performed in a professional manner. Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 Page 4 of 6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fife* APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: 1. I have, at a minimum, developed and reported this appraisal in accordance with the scope of work requirements stated in this appraisal report. 2. I performed a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property. I reported the condition of the improvements in factual, specific terms. I identified and reported the physical deficiencies that could affect the livability, soundness, or structural integrity of the property. 3. I performed this appraisal in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopted and promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place at the time this appraisal report was prepared. 4. I developed my opinion of the market value of the real property that is the subject of this report based on the sales comparison approach to value. I have adequate comparable market data to develop a reliable sales comparison approach for this appraisal assignment. I further certify that I considered the cost and income approaches to value but did not develop them, unless otherwise indicated in this report. 5. I researched, verified, analyzed, and reported on any current agreement for sale for the subject property, any offering for sale of the subject property in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal, and the prior sales of the subject property for a minimum of three years prior to the effective date of this appraisal, unless otherwise indicated in this report. 6. I researched, verified, analyzed, and reported on the prior sales of the comparable sales for a minimum of one year prior to the date of sale of the comparable sale, unless otherwise indicated in this report. 7. I selected and used comparable sales that are locationally, physically, and functionally the most similar to the subject property. 8. I have not used comparable sales that were the result of combining a land sale with the contract purchase price of a home that has been built or will be built on the land. 9. I have reported adjustments to the comparable sales that reflect the market's reaction to the differences between the subject property and the comparable sales. 10. I verified, from a disinterested source, all information in this report that was provided by parties who have a financial interest in the sale or financing of the subject property. 11. I have knowledge and experience in appraising this type of property in this market area. 12. I am aware of, and have access to, the necessary and appropriate public and private data sources, such as multiple listing services, tax assessment records, public land records and other such data sources for the area in which the property is located. 13. I obtained the information, estimates, and opinions fumished by other parties and expressed in this appraisal report from reliable sources that I believe to be true and correct. 14. I have taken into consideration the factors that have an impact on value with respect to the subject neighborhood, subject property, and the proximity of the subject property to adverse influences in the development of my opinion of market value. I have noted in this appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as, but not limited to, needed repairs, deterioration, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, adverse environmental conditions, etc.) observed during the inspection of the subject property or that I became aware of during the research involved in performing this appraisal. I have considered these adverse conditions in my analysis of the property value, and have reported on the effect of the conditions on the value and marketability of the subject property. 15. I have not knowingly withheld any significant information from this appraisal report and, to the best of my knowledge, all statements and information in this appraisal report are true and correct. 16. I stated in this appraisal report my own personal, unbiased, and professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions, which are subject only to the assumptions and limiting conditions in this appraisal report. 17. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no present or prospective personal interest or bias with respect to the participants in the transaction. I did not base, either partially or completely, my analysis and/or opinion of market value in this appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, age, marital status, handicap, familial status, or national origin of either the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property or on any other basis prohibited by law. 18. My employment and/or compensation for performing this appraisal or any future or anticipated appraisals was not conditioned on any agreement or understanding, written or otherwise, that I would report (or present analysis supporting) a predetermined specific value, a predetermined minimum value, a range or direction in value, a value that favors the cause of any party, or the attainment of a specific result or occurrence of a specific subsequent event (such as approval of a pending mortgage loan application). 19. I personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in this appraisal report. If I relied on significant real property appraisal assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of this appraisal or the preparation of this appraisal report, I have named such individual(s) and disclosed the specific tasks performed in this appraisal report. I certify that any individual so named is qualified to perform the tasks. I have not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in this appraisal report; therefore, any change made to this appraisal is unauthorized and I will take no responsibility for it. 20. I identified the lender/client in this appraisal report who is the individual, organization, or agent for the organization that ordered and will receive this appraisal report. Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 Page5of6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Uniform Residential Appraisal Report Fileri 21 The lender/client may disclose or distribute this appraisal report to: the borrower; another lender at the request of the borrower; the mortgagee or its successors and assigns; mortgage insurers; govemment sponsored enterprises; other secondary market participants; data collection or reporting services; professional appraisal organizations; any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States; and any state, the District of Columbia, or other jurisdictions; without having to obtain the appraiser's or supervisory appraiser's (if applicable) consent. Such consent must be obtained before this appraisal report may be disclosed or distributed to any other party (including, but not limited to, the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media). 22. I am aware that any disclosure or distribution of this appraisal report by me or the lender/client may be subject to certain laws and regulations. Further, I am also subject to the provisions of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that pertain to disclosure or distribution by me. 23. The borrower, another lender at the request of the borrower, the mortgagee or its successors and assigns, mortgage insurers, government sponsored enterprises, and other secondary market participants may rely on this appraisal report as part of any mortgage finance transaction that involves any one or more of these parties. 24. If this appraisal report was transmitted as an "electronic record" containing my "electronic signature," as those terms are defined in applicable federal and/or state laws (excluding audio and video recordings), or a facsimile transmission of this appraisal report containing a copy or representation of my signature, the appraisal report shall be as effective, enforceable and valid as if a paper version of this appraisal report were delivered containing my original hand written signature. 25. Any intentional or negligent misrepresentation(s) contained in this appraisal report may result in civil liability and/or criminal penalties including, but not limited to, fine or imprisonment or both under the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001, et seq., or similar state laws. SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: The Supervisory Appraiser certifies and agrees that: 1. I directly supervised the appraiser for this appraisal assignment, have read the appraisal report, and agree with the appraiser's analysis, opinions, statements, conclusions, and the appraiser's certification. 2. I accept full responsibility for the contents of this appraisal report including, but not limited to, the appraiser's analysis, opinions, statements, conclusions, and the appraiser's certification. 3. The appraiser identified in this appraisal report is either a sub -contractor or an employee of the supervisory appraiser (or the appraisal firm), is qualified to perform this appraisal, and is acceptable to perform this appraisal under the applicable state law. 4. This appraisal report complies with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopted and promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place at the time this appraisal report was prepared. 5. If this appraisal report was transmitted as an "electronic record" containing my "electronic signature," as those terms are defined in applicable federal and/or state laws (excluding audio and video recordings), or a facsimile transmission of this appraisal report containing a copy or representation of my signature, the appraisal report shall be as effective, enforceable and valid as if a paper version of this appraisal report were delivered containing my original hand written signature. APPRAISER SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIRED) Signature Name Company Name Company Address Telephone Number Email Address Date of Signature and Report Effective Date of Appraisal State Certification # or State License # or Other (describe) State # State Expiration Date of Certification or License ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED APPRAISED VALUE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY $ LENDER/CLIENT Name Company Name Company Address Email Address Signature Name Company Name Company Address Telephone Number Email Address _ Date of Signature State Certification # or State License # _ State Expiration Date of Certification or License SUBJECT PROPERTY ❑ Did not inspect subject property ❑ Did inspect exterior of subject property from street Date of Inspection ❑ Did inspect interior and exterior of subject property Date of Inspection COMPARABLE SALES ❑ Did not inspect exterior of comparable sales from street ❑ Did inspect exterior of comparable sales from street Date of Inspection Freddie Mac Form 70 March 2005 Page 6 of 6 Fannie Mae Form 1004 March 2005 Instructions Uniform Residential Appraisal Report This report form is designed to report an appraisal of a one -unit property or a one -unit property with an accessory unit; including a unit in a planned unit development (PUD), based on an interior and exterior inspection of the subject property. This report form is not designed to report an appraisal of a manufactured home or a unit in a condominium or cooperative project. Use This report form is designed to report an appraisal of a one -unit property or a one -unit property with an accessory unit; including a unit in a planned unit development (PUD), based on an interior and exterior inspection of the subject property. This report form is not designed to report an appraisal of a manufactured home or a unit in a condominium or cooperative project. Modifications, Additions, or Deletions This appraisal report is subject to the scope of work, intended use, intended user, definition of market value, statement of assumptions and limiting conditions, and certifications contained in the report form. Modifications, additions, or deletions to the intended use, intended user, definition of market value, or assumptions and limiting conditions are not permitted. The appraiser may expand the scope of work to include any additional research or analysis necessary based on the complexity of this appraisal assignment. Modifications or deletions to the certifications are also not permitted. However, additional certifications that do not constitute material alterations to this appraisal report, such as those required by law or those related to the appraiser's continuing education or membership in an appraisal organization are permitted. Scope of Work The scope of work for this appraisal is defined by the complexity of this appraisal assignment and the reporting requirements of this appraisal report form, including the following definition of market value, statement of assumptions and limiting conditions, and certifications. The appraiser must, at a minimum: (1) perform a complete visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the subject property, (2) inspect the neighborhood, (3) inspect each of the comparable sales from at least the street, (4) research, verify, and analyze data from reliable public and/or private sources, and (5) report his or her analysis, opinions, and conclusions in this appraisal report. Required Exhibits • A street map that shows the location of the subject property and of all comparables that the appraiser used; • An exterior building sketch of the improvements that indicates the dimensions. The appraiser must also include calculations to show how he or she arrived at the estimate for gross living area. A floor plan sketch that indicates the dimensions is required instead of the exterior building or unit sketch if the floor plan is atypical or functionally obsolete, thus limiting the market appeal for the property in comparison to competitive properties in the neighborhood; • Clear, descriptive photographs (either in black and white or color) that show the front, back, and a street scene of the subject property, and that are appropriately identified. (Photographs must be originals that are produced either by photography or electronic imaging.); • Clear, descriptive photographs (either in black and white or color) that show the front of each comparable sale and that are appropriately identified. Generally, photographs should be originals that are produced by photography or electronic imaging; however, copies of photographs from a multiple listing service or from the appraiser's files are acceptable if they are clear and descriptive; • Any other data --as an attachment or addendum to the appraisal report form --that are necessary to provide an adequately supported opinion of market value. Instructions Page NI 1 1\7 ter The Sirlhplaca of Minnesota 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us NOTE: Public can participate in person at City Hall, online at www.zoomgov.com or call 1-646-828-7666 and enter the meeting ID number: 161 843 8759 or watch live on the city website or on local Channel 16. Public comments can be emailed to stillwater@ci.stillwater.mn.us AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING October 5, 2021 REGULAR MEETING 4:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Downtown Parking Commission Work Plan IV. RECESS RECESSED MEETING 7:00 P.M. V. CALL TO ORDER VI. ROLL CALL VII. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE VIII. RECOGNITIONS OR PRESENTATIONS 2. Pregnancy and Infants Loss Remembrance Day Proclamation 3. Fire Prevention Week 2021 Proclamation 4. Geri Freels Donation Proclamation IX. OPEN FORUM - the open forum allows the public to address council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting. Council may take action, reply or give direction to staff. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes or less. X. STAFF REPORTS 5. Public Works Director 6. Police Chief 7. Fire Chief 8. Finance Director 9. Community Development Director 10. City Clerk 11. City Attorney 12. City Administrator XI. CONSENT AGENDA - these items are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion with no discussion. A council member or citizen may request an item to be removed from the consent agenda and considered separately. 13. September 21, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes 14. Payment of Bills 15. Certification of Delinquent Parking Mitigation Fees - Resolution 16. Certification of Delinquent Cleanup Services Charges - Resolution 17. Emergency Vehicle Premption System Project 18. 2022 Employee Group Health Insurance Opt Out Option - Resolution 19. Fire Department Request to Purchase a Fireboat 20. Harvest Fest 2021 Contract Amendment - Resolution 21. Skate Park Ramp Donation XII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - when addressing Council please limit your comments to 10 minutes or less. 22. CPC Case No. 2021-54 to consider a request by Todd Ganz of Integrity Land Development, applicant and Gary and June Jorgensen, property owners. Consideration of a Re -subdivision to split the property into two lots and a rezone from AP to RB. Property located at 13187 Dellwood Rd N. Notices published in the Stillwater Gazette and mailed to affected property owners on Friday, September 10th, 2021 - Tabled to November 9, 2021. 23. Project 2021-02 Assessment Hearing for the 2021 Street Improvement Project. Notice was published in the Stillwater Gazette and mailed to affected property owners on September 17, 2021- Resolution 24. CPC Case No. 2021-56 to consider a request by the City of Stillwater, applicant. Request is for Zoning Text Amendment to amend the Sign Code to create design standards for signage in the CA and CBD Districts. Notice published in the Stillwater Gazette on Friday, September 10th, 2021. - Tabled to October 19, 2021. XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 25. Update on Chestnut Street Plaza Design Process and Contract Amendment - Resolution XIV. NEW BUSINESS 26. 2021 Sidewalk Project Rejecting Bids - Resolution 27. Compensation Market Review Selection and Award Contract - Resolution 28. Lift Bridge & Downtown Lighting Proposals XV. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS XVI. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 2 City Council Meeting Agenda October 5, 2021 Uwater THE RTHPLACE O F M i N N E S 0 1 A PLANNING REPORT TO: City Council MEETING DATE: October 5, 2021 REQUEST: Review Downtown Parking Commission Work Plan REPORT BY: Downtown Parking Commission Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION On July 1, 2020 the Downtown Parking Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the parking capacity study. The Council did this on August 18, 2020. The study identifies nine strategies for improving parking capacity, along with tasks to accomplish those strategies. This spring the Downtown Parking Commission held several meetings to develop a work plan to implement the study's nine strategies. SPECIFIC REQUEST This case is to discuss the Downtown Parking Commission's Work Plan (attached). In addition, as time allows, the Downtown Parking Commission would like to do a slightly deeper dive on the following priority topics. 1. Parking Mitigation Policy and Other Pricing Policies o New Development Parking Mitigation o Business Parking Permits o Events o Short Term Rental Parking Permits 2. Enforcement Policies and Technology/Customer Experience o Including Payment Options 3. Improve Communication (Internal and External) and the Customer Experience o Lot Closures for Events o Communication to Visitors; Communication to Residents and Business Owners Attachments: Downtown Parking Commission Work Plan Downtown Parking District Report (HKGI) 2021-2024 Downtown Parking Commission Work Plan (Suggested Reformatting) City Strategic Goal: Develop Organizational Excellence • Related and Relevant Strategies o Maintain High Quality, Efficient Public Service Delivery Standards o Implement Software Integration and Update City Facilities Downtown Parking Strategy: Improve Enforcement and Technology (including Event Parking Strategy) Project Number Action Timeframe Additional Resources Needed Commission Comments Streamline Payment Systems and Consolidate three (3) existing systems into a single system Q4 2021 40 Hours Staff Time Research License Plat Reader (LPR System) for enforcement Q4 2021 10 Hours Staff Time $40,000 Capital Cost High Priority Update Event Policies for utilization of public lots for events 2022-2023 10 Hours Staff Time Medium Priority City Strategic Goal: Develop Our Community • Related and Relevant Strategies o Promote Economic Development and Housing Affordability o Become a Year Round Destination City with a Sustainable and Balanced Downtown o Update City Infrastructure, Including Parks and Recreation Facilities o Enhance City Policies and Ordinances Downtown Parking Strategy: Ensure Parking Capacity Meets Downtown Needs (Combo of Pricing/Utilization Counts) Project Number Action Timeframe Additional Resources Needed Commission Comments Create a Utilization Count Program Q4 2021 5 Hours Staff Time Low to Medium Priority Conduct Annual Utilization County Ongoing 10 Hours Staff Time Low to Medium Priority Update Business Parking Permit policies and fees 2022 20-40 Hours Staff Time Medium Priority Require more advance Event Planning Update Overall Downtown Parking Pricing Strategy/Fees 2022 20 Hours Staff Time Only support raising Lot 2 Fee to $5 Staff Comment: City Council discussion in Strategic Plan to Evaluate revenue options broadly. Review On -Street Parking Rules and Restrictions 2022-2023 40 Hours Staff Time High Priority - favor reducing hour limits at least in certain zones to encourage users to use perimeter lots. Update Zoning Code to ensure necessary capacity expansion is achievable 2024 10 Hours Staff Time Low Priority Downtown Parking Strategy: Improve Customer Experience (Combination of Wayfinding/Signage and Customer Service) Project Number Action Timeframe Additional Resources Needed Commission Comments Create a Master Wayfinding Sign Plan 2022 20 Hours Staff Time or $5,000 Contracted Services Medium Priority Install Wayfinding Signage 2023 TBD — Based on findings of Master Wayfinding Sign Plan Medium Priority Develop Wayfinding Mobile App ---'c--2024 TBD Medium Priority Develop Marketing Campaign O 2023 TBD Partner with Discover Stillwater Medium Priority Consider Valet Service (or circulator service) 2024 TBD Medium Priority DOWNTOWN STILLWATER PARKING EFFICIENCY & MANAGEMENT PLAN August 2020 CONTENTS Introduction Study Goals and Objectives 4 Setting the Stage 5 Defining Downtown Stillwater's Parking Users36 Existing Conditions. 8 Parking Demand. 12 Shifting The Demand 16 District Wide Parking Solutions. 18 Strategies & Recommendations. .20 Next Steps. 31 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lily Louncl Mayor Kozlowski Councilors Collins, Junker (DPC Liaison), Weidner, Polehna Downtown Parking Commission Chairman Anderson Commissioners Glynn, Hopfe, Johnson, Lepage, Lettner, McAllister Council Liaison Junker City Staff Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Consultant HKGi Thanks also to members of the downtown business community for your input and review! tiihivater INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Study Downtown Stillwater is a bustling destination with emerging and established places to work, live, shop, eat, and play. Along with the many people using downtown, comes a need to park vehicles. Not having enough parking because an area is too popular is a problem many communities would love to have, but it is a problem nonetheless. The Stillwater Parking Commission initiated this study to provide alternatives that maximize today's parking supply before large investments are made to the expansion of downtown's parking supply. This study addresses current and future parking demand, while recommending parking strategies that minimize major capital expenditures. The study focuses on opportunities for parking efficiencies, especially at times when parking demand is at its peak. This includes strategies that balance the parking needs of a variety of users (e.g., residents, employers, patrons, and visitors). PARKING STUDY I STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES In order to provide a better parking experience for those who live, work, and visit downtown, this study provides strategies to: Maximize today's parking supply Build on past studies Embrace a district -wide parking approach Maximize current investments nnnn Identify low-cost/ high -benefit solutions I 1110 a jj Water. SETTING THE STAGE The Unique Nature of Parking in Downtowns People are attracted to downtowns for their unique character and urban design. When visitors enter a vibrant downtown, it is hard not to notice the large number of businesses within a small area, as well as the number of people walking and interacting with one another. The "place" provided by a diverse and vibrant downtown is the primary reason people choose to visit downtown. The availability of convenient, affordable parking may be a factor in the decision making, but not the driving factor. Expansive parking lots simply take away from the place making experience that make downtowns a great place. The conventional approach to parking is to make it free and as close as possible. This strategy can work in communities without a significant amount of commercial activity or in areas where land is plentiful and low cost. But this approach does not work in traditional downtowns where a large number of amenities and activities occupy a small area.Too much emphasis on parking can negatively impact the unique qualities (e.g., walkability and charm) a downtown has to offer, resulting in a less desirable place to visit. Balancing the parking needs for a vibrant downtown requires a district -wide parking approach. A district -wide parking approach uses a combination of strategies to maximize the existing parking supply, while reducing the demand to build additional spaces. This approach is commonly applied in downtown settings to encourage walkability, foster economic growth, and strengthen the urban form. OVERCOMING PERCEPTIONS Downtown Stillwater Highway 36 & Stillwater Boulevard While big box stores are able to provide parking within view of the front door, it is not uncommon for parking users to walk the length of a city block (660 feet) to get to the front door. Because a downtown front door is not always visible from a parking spot, the perception of the parking user is that they have to walk much further to their destination. These parking perceptions can be changed in downtowns by applying effective wayfinding measures, while improving the user's experience from their parking space to their final destination. PARKING STUDY I DEFINING DOWNTOWN STILLWATER'S PARKING USERS Downtown Stillwater's parking supply serves a wide range of users (e.g., residents, employees, eventgoers, and patrons) that require different parking needs throughout the day. Table 1 offers a generalized way to think about the different groups of parking users and their parking needs. For example, the short-term user will look for convenient front door parking. The type of land uses associated with this parking need includes specialty shops, convenience stores, coffee shops, and fast -casual dining. The long-term users, which makes -up the majority of the parking users in Downtown Stillwater are staying for longer periods of times. These types of parking users include employees, visitors taking advantage of multiple things to do in downtown, residents, eventgoers, trailhead users, and sit-down/fine dining restaurants. Inevitably, everyone would like a free and open parking space with no time restriction at their front door. This is not practical or feasible. Parking should be viewed as a limited resource and amenity to the downtown. Improving the efficiency of this resource will require trade-offs. The City and its partners will need to accept that some people will need to park further away if they are planning to spend longer periods of time in downtown, while providing short-term parking closer to the core for the short-term user. Table 2 provides guidance on how to balance these expectations by parking user. Table 1. Downtown Parking User Characteristics PARKING USER TYPICAL TURNOVER EXAMPLES OF THE TYPICAL USER % OF SPACES TODA Limited User (One -Stop -Shop) 0-30 Minutes • Parcel delivery • Pickup/Drop-off (Uber, Lyft, Childcare) • Dry Cleaner • Convenience Store • Take -Away Food/Coffee • Business Delivery 2% 40 on street spaces + loading zones Short Term User 1-2 Hours • 1 Stop Shopping • Fast/Casual Food (eat in) • Grocery Store • Sit down restaurant/bar/brewery • EV Charging (fast charging) None Wind up using same as long term Long Term User 2-4 Hours • Sit down restaurant /bar/brewery • Multi-Stop/Window shoppers • Tourists • Trailhead users • Residential Guest • EV Charging (fast charging) 63% 572 off street 667 on street Daily User 4-8+ Hours • Employees • Residents • Hotel Guests • Events • Trailhead Users • EV Charging (overnight) 35% I Rill jj Water. Table 2. Downtown Parking Standards by User PARKING USER STANDARDS TIME RESTRICTIONS LOCATION PRICE TYPE One Stop Shop User 15-30 Minutes Proximity to the Front Door Free On -Street Short Term User 1-2 Hours 1-2 Blocks from Front Door Free On Street Off -Street Long Term User 2-4 Hours 2-4 Blocks from Front Door Nominal Fee Off -Street Daily User 4-8+ Hours 2-4 Blocks or Off -Site Nominal Fee On -Site (Residents) Off-Street/site (Employees) Off -Site (Events) BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (PARKING TURNOVER & ENFORCEMENT) Table 2 provides time restriction standards that help create parking turnover. For example, a service - oriented district (e.g., dry cleaner, post office, and coffee shop) typically requires a higher turnover rate to accommodate customers, resulting in parking restrictions ranging between 15 minutes and 1 hour. A tourism or entertainment district, such as Downtown Stillwater, typically sees a lower turnover rate. Time restrictions in these types of areas can range between 2 and 4 hours. Assigning time restrictions to parking spaces helps create turnover for users and improves the overall efficiency of the parking system. Creating this efficiency requires parking enforcement. It is worth noting that without enforcement, many users quickly realize the lack of consequences and park illegally. A report for the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy reviewed a number of studies across the country and found strong evidence of illegal parking. These findings include: • University of California studied parking in Berkeley and found that 32 percent of vehicles in one hour parking spaces exceeded the time limit. • The same study found that 30 percent of driving commuters routinely parked illegally. • A survey of 2,000 Seattle parking spaces found that the average park time in one hour zones was 2.1 hours. • A study in San Francisco found that a third of parking space users in and around downtown exceeded their time limits or did not pay metered parking. • A Brooklyn, New York study also found that as parking reaches 85% capacity, the amount of illegal parking increases dramatically. This in turn creates other problems such as parking in restricted zones and reluctance to give up a parking space that has reached its time limit • Audits in Fredricksburg, Virginia found 25 percent of parking space users parked for longer than the allowed time limits. In the case of the Fredricksburg study, the City dramatically increased enforcement and created 20 percent more parking availability. While effective, the issues with enforcement must also be recognized. Enforcement is costly, and ticketing can discourage people from returning. This can be mitigated with clearly marked signs regarding time restrictions or enforcement can be softened by issuing "first offence warnings"and ticketing repeat/habitual offenders. PARKING STUDY I EXISTING CONDITIONS Parking Supply & Management of the System The majority of Downtown Stillwater's parking supply consists of off-street municipal lots, parking ramps, and on - street parking spaces (see Figures 1 & 2). Characteristics of this parking supply include: Parking Rates • Most of the public parking is at no cost to the user. Exceptions include a nominal fee to park in the Municipal Ramp, Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 13. • On -street parking is free. Time Restrictions • The majority of on -street parking is signed for a 3 hour time limit. • The majority of off-street parking is free with a 4 hour time limit. Enforcement • Parking enforcement for on -street and off-street parking concludes at 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and weekends. • The City staffs one full-time parking enforcement office. Operations & Management • Parking operations and management is primarily funded through the Downtown Enterprise Fund. The Downtown Enterprise Fund is comprised of fees collected through the sale of parking passes, parking fines, one day parking passes, and event parking permits. • The City contracts with AirGarage to manage the collection of fees for the Municipal Ramp. • Figure 1. Downtown Stillwater Parking Supply Summary • • r► SHORT TERM (39) • _ (15min, 30min, Loading) • 3 HOUR (416) • Adriverentering ON-STREETALL DAY (239) • Downtown Stillwater FREE • has anumber of►SURFACE LOTS3 HOUR (65) potential parking options, depending on what they need and how close they need to park to their destination • • Ilk4 HOUR (432) ALL DAY (193) SURFACE LOTS ALL DAY (182) PAID RAMPS ALL DAY (300) ©© $lllwater. Kin'::: Figure 2. Downtown Stillwater Parking illwater Public Parking Downtown Stillwater 2020 Legend ODowntown Parking District City Parking Lot rn - City Parking Ramp ®�yPublic- upper level (Crosby Hotel) 2.I\\ V Trailhead Parking (Lot 12) 3 ® Private parking only (Lot 8a) Permit parking only (Lot 12) I I Trailers & large vehicles (Lot 12) I I On -street handicapped I 115 minute parking limit s - 30 minute parking limit a I Loading/unloading avi — Valet rn I I Bus loading/unloading - Bus parking Monthly Permits * Business Permit Valid E . DT Resident Permit Valid o- (allows overnight parting) • Free parking lot (year round) • Pay parking lot (Free Nov 1-Apr 30) 0 Available to public after 6 PM ' •Numbersindreles= hour limits on free parking On -street parking is free, but limited to 3 hrs unless posted for less Lot 1 (pay lot)(Free Nov 1 -Apr 30)- 98 spaces Lot 2 (pay lot)(Free Nov 1 -Apr 30)- 84 spaces Lot 3 (free lot - 3 hr) -- 33 spaces Lot 4 (free lot - 4hr) -- 33 spaces Lot 5 (free lot - 4hr) -- ] spaces Lot 6 (free lot - 3 hr) -- 16 spaces Lot 7(free lot-3 hr) -- 16 spaces Lot 8a (-private") -- 51 spaces Lot ob (free lot -4hr) - 75 spaces Lot 9(free lot -4hr) -- 30 spaces Lot 10 (free all day; ovemight by permit) -48 spaces Lot 11 (free all day; ovemight by permit) -45 spaces Lot 12 (part free all day; no overnight here) -78 spaces (part permit only; overnight allowed here)- 23 spaces Lot 13 (free lot-4 hr) - 14 spaces Lot 14 (free lot-4 hr) - 47 spaces Lot 15 (free lot -4hr) - 97 spaces Lot 16 (free after hrs) - 60 spaces Lot 17 (free after hrs) - 75 spaces Lot 18 (free lot- 24 hr)- 22 spaces Public Ramp (pay) — 248 spaces Public level, Crosby (pay) 52 spaces ' Free public lot after 6 PM 1,252 off-street parking spaces: 1,211 general public 41 handicapped spaces 468 marked on -street spaces: 416 general public 18 handicapped spaces 1315 minute spaces 7 30 minute spaces 19 Loading spaces 239 unmarked on -street spaces (Includes 91 on 2nd 8t no. of Mulberry) 1,959 total public spaces 1,456 free public spaces (74.3 / ) M.p oa for Dow.. Pa PARKING STUDY I Business Concerns and Needs Downtown Stillwater's businesses were engaged early - on in the planning process to better understand their parking concerns and needs. Presentations and group discussions were held at the following meetings: • Main Street Stillwater Independent Business Alliance (IBA) - January 3, 2020 • Stillwater Chamber of Commerce - January 29, 2020 Common themes or messages that were received during these meetings are summarized throughout this section by topic area. Enforcement, Operations, and Maintenance • Stronger parking enforcement is needed to help minimize the number of vehicles violating on - street parking restrictions (e.g., exceeding the time limit). • Time restrictions for on -street parking and parking enforcement ends at 6 p.m. Therefore, it is assumed there are a number of employees using on -street parking spaces during the evening hours. • Regular snow maintenance needs to be a collaborative effort between both the city and businesses to ensure downtown is walkable during the winter months. Employee Parking • Businesses should be encouraging their employees to park in lots that are located outside of the downtown core. • Employees should not be using on -street parking as an option during their shifts. • Designated parking areas for employees should be considered as a parking solution. Event Parking • Event parking should be located outside of the downtown (e.g., off -site parking) to accommodate higher parking demand during larger events. A shuttle service needs to be provided if off -site parking is going to be used for events. • The City should consider charging for parking in some of the lots during large events. Revenue collected during these events should be used for implementing other parking strategies. Downtown Stillwater is comprised of a mix of land uses ©® tillwate' Mobility • Parking solutions need to take into consideration the public realm and bicycle/pedestrian needs. • There is a growing demand for bicycle parking, in addition to car parking for trailhead users.Trailhead users are generally parking near the Zephyr Theater. In some cases, vehicles are parking illegally in the Zephyr Theater lot, which has caused parking problems when events are being held at the theater. • Traffic circulation continues to be a topic of discussion as traffic patterns have shifted with the new bridge opening. Discussions have focused on turning movements at Main Street and Chestnut (e.g., eliminate the left -turn onto Chestnut). Parking Restrictions • In general, businesses are in favor of reducing the length of time vehicles are allowed to park on -street. Most of the on - street parking is signed for a three hour time limit and should be reduced (e.g., one or two hour time limits) in an effort to free up on -street parking spaces for short-term users/ customers and minimize the number of employees who are utilizing on -street parking. Parking Fees • There is little or no support for paid on -street parking (e.g., pay stations or meters). However, charging for off-street parking (e.g., surface lots) may be a potential strategy in helping manage parking during events or peak periods of the day. Wayfinding and Signage • Wayfinding and signage needs to be considered to help direct people to underutilized parking lots. • A more comprehensive wayfinding plan is also needed for the downtown to eliminate sign clutter, while providing the appropriate signs that direct people to key destinations and parking facilities. • Mobile parking applications should play a role in helping visitors find parking. • More information (online and print) and marketing materials should be created to help educate people on where to park. Downtown Stillwater is home to many residents PARKING STUDY I PARKING DEMAND Utilization counts help better understand today's current parking demand. Utilization counts serve as a quantitative measure in documenting existing parking conditions (e.g., parking demand), while verifying issues and concerns. Utilization counts used for this study are based on historical counts collected by the City in 2015 (see Figure 3 and Table 3). Off -Street Parking Utilization Any count over 93% should be interpreted as effectively full. Counts between 85-93% suggest lots are at or approaching capacity and though there is still some parking, driving behaviors change and people begin circling the block or lot to find parking. Parking utilization over 75% gives the impression that the lots are filling up, but do not pose any concerns. Less than 75% utilization could be categorized as having ample parking available or the spaces are being underutilized. Findings & Observations • In general, Downtown Stillwater is experiencing high demand for parking during the weekends and evening hours. • There is still parking available in the Municipal Ramp or Lot 12 when parking demand is at it's peak (e.g., Saturday evenings). • Lots 1 and 2 are experiencing high parking demand, which are also pay Iots.This observation suggests people are willing to pay to park. • During off-peak seasons and hours, parking is still well utilized. Observations from the study team and conversations with business owners suggest that while spaces are still available, employees are still parking close to the core. • Off-street parking is generally underutilized during the morning hours and winter months. Precedent Examples of Downtown Stillwater's Parking ,10164 111121 illwater. Figure 3. Depiction of Parking Demand and Utilization FRIDAY 4:30PM 7:OOPM 9:OOAM SATURDAY NOON 6:OOPM SUNDAY 1:OOPM Table 3. Parking Demand and Utilization by Lot/Ramp LOT SPACES FRIDAY 4:30PM 7:OOPM 9:OOAM SATURDAY 12:OOPM 4:OOPM 6:OOPM SUNDAY 1:OOPM 3:30PM 98 56% 1I- 11% 00% 100% 100% 10 2 84 45% 10 23% 95% 100% 100% 10 3 33 88% 10 64% 100% 100% 100% I00% 10 4 29 83% 10 17% 100% 100% 100°A 100% 10 5 7 57% " 43% 10(v-' 100% 100 100" 6 16 75% i 38% I '4% 1' 1 0( 7 16 81% 1L 81% 1U0% 100% 10Uu/o IL 8b 75 65% 10 '9% 1 100% 100% 00% 89% 9 30 67% 1C 27% 1 100% 100% 60% 10 10 48 63% 91 38% 1 100% 100% 98% 10 11 45 A% 10., 33% 1jig.` 100% 93% 10. 12 101 12% 11% 21% 29% 32% 39% 14% 22% 13 23 35% 26% 0% 22% 22% 43% 13% 9% 14 8 50% 63% 38% 125% 63% ' 100% 25% 50% 15 13 10' 31% 85% 131% 146% 31% 38% 16 47 79% 1C 23% 1 100% 100% 89% 17 97 79% 110 20% 1 100% 85% ramp Total 248 1018 45% 57% 64% 80% 21% 24% 31% 74% 34% I 75% 56% 83% 19% 66% 23% 68% Legend: No Capacity Issues (0% - 74% Occupied) Monitor Capacity (75% - 84% Occupied) At or Approaching Capacity (85% - 92% Occupied) At Capacity (93%+ Occupied) PARKING STUDY I On -Street Parking There are no official parking utilization counts for on -street parking. However, field observations and conversations with parking enforcement and business owners helped identify general assumptions on how on -street parking is being utilized. Figure 4 provides a generalization of on -street utilization, which suggests on -street parking is heavy utilized. On -street parking is also signed for longer than normal time restrictions for a typical downtown. Based on research performed in 2020, downtown Stillwater is the only downtown with widespread three hour on -street parking compared to 12 other precedent examples (see Table 4). Limiting on -street parking to two hours would improve parking and convenient access for the short-term and one -stop users. Because on -street parking spaces are the first spaces that a driver sees, and the closest to their destination, they are the most desirable spaces. If spaces are full, a driver may circle a few times trying to find a parking space, or stop prematurely and wait if someone is getting into their car. This can have negative effects on traffic, increasing congestion and the number of turning movements that happen as driver's circle, which is a challenge in a downtown where a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment is critical to the vitality and success of the district. Findings & Observations • On -street parking is heavily utilized on any given day of the year. • Heavy utilization rates are attributed to human behavior that suggests people will chose the closets parking space first, if available. • Heavy utilization is also attributed to the time restrictions set for on -street parking (3 hour time limit). • Parking enforcement is rarely enforced and ends at 6 p.m. Those who are familiar with this system may take advantage of the system and extend their time of stay beyond the 3 hour time limit. • The demand for short-term on -street parking is growing to accommodate rideshare services (e.g., Uber and Lyft), curbside pickup (e.g., Uber Eats, Door Dash, and Grub Hub), and delivery services. Figure 4. On -Street Parking Table 4. On -Street Time Restrictions (Precedent Examples) 3 Hours 2 Hours 1 Hour Stillwater Anoka, Bemidji, Duluth, Mankato, Fargo/Moorhead, Red Wing, St. Cloud, Wayzata, White Bear Lake, Winona Hopkins *Rochester varies from 30 minutes to 2 hours ©© lllwater. ©8 . Findings & Observations Analysis of the current parking situation in downtown has provided a few key findings and observation that will influence which strategies will have the biggest impact. Parking Utilization The downtown is experiencing heavy utilization during the evening hours and weekends.This heavy utilization is primarily occurring at the core, which includes both surface lots and on -street parking.The parking spaces that are underutilized are generally located on the edges of Downtown Stillwater. During the typical workday, the downtown is experiencing normal utilization rates (i.e., morning and afternoon hours).These utilization patterns are typical for a successful downtown with a mix of land uses. Seasonal Use Parking is generally well used throughout the year, while the highest demand for parking occurs during the summer months. Summer months have more demand and generate more parking shortages when high numbers of visitors experiencing Stillwater compete for parking. Balancing Parking Expectations The majority of the business community recognizes that there are opportunities to manage parking more efficiently to accommodate the various users. This results in some tradeoffs and expectations that long-term parking users will be required to walk a reasonable distance between their car and destination. On -street time restrictions should also be reconfigured to increase parking turnover in the core, while ramping up parking enforcement to ensure people comply with new time restrictions. Coordination and Collaboration The business community recognizes there are some changes that need to occur and is supportive in working together in finding parking efficiencies. Precedent Example of Downtown Stillwater's On -Street Parking Utilization PARKING STUDY I SHIFTING THE DEMAND It is assumed when a downtown's parking supply is at 93% utilization it is at full capacity. The remaining 7% capacity helps maintain a healthy supply of parking to manage traffic circulation and parking turnover. Based on these industry standards, the parking lots located in the core are typically at capacity and above the 93% utilization threshold. This area is recognized as Zone 1 in Figure 5. Parking lots in Zone 1 are chosen first based on their visibility and ease of access from main roads. As a result, traffic becomes an issue as people circle the block or wait for an available space to free up. Alleviating these parking stresses in the core will help improve the perception of downtown not having enough parking. Shifting parking demand to underutilized lots will require a combination of strategies that are discussed later in this study. Maximize today's parking supply SMALL SHIFT, BIG IMPACT While many of the parking lots are filling up, there are a few lots that remain underutilized during peak demand (evenings and weekends). The Municipal Ramp and Lot 12 has additional capacity to accommodate more users. Findings suggest a shift in parking demand from the core to these underutilized facilities will help alleviate the parking stresses in downtown. A shift in parking demand needs to occur to help create greater parking efficiencies. This can be achieved by shifting parking demand from Zone 1 and Zone 2 to other areas of downtown that are still walkable. Lots 12 and the Municipal Ramp/Lot 13 has ample parking available to absorb more users. It is assumed approximately 40 parking users need to be shifted from Zones 1 and 2 to maintain a healthy utilization rate between 85% and 93% (see Table 5). It is important to recognize the City is adding an additional 39 off-street spaces adjacent to Lot 14 in the summer of 2020. Adding this capacity should help alleviate the parking stresses that occur in Zone 2 during peak periods. In that respect, stronger energy should be focused on shifting parking demand from Zone 1 to the Municipal Ramp/Lot 13 or to a larger extent, Lot 12. This goal is obtainable when using the appropriate parking strategies that take into consideration the various parking needs for every user in Downtown Stillwater (e.g., residents, business, and visitors). Table 5. Sending Zones ZONE SPACES PEAK UTILIZATION UTILIZATION GOAL SHIFT NEEDED 1 299 100% 85% 24 2 165 100% 85% 13 Total 464 100% 85% 38 Table 6. Receiving Zones TARGET SPACES PEAK UTILIZATION EXCESS AREA UTILIZATION GOAL CAPACITY Ramp 248 64% 85% 53 12 101 39% 85% 47 Total 349 57% 85% 100 I ©pa jj Water. Figure 5. Parking Zones The Parking Commission Districts identified in the 2017 Stillwater Parking Study were consolidated into two zones. This supports a district -wide parking approach that maximizes today's parking supply. IPARKING STUDY I DISTRICT WIDE PARKING SOLUTIONS Finding the appropriate parking management solutions for Downtown Stillwater requires a district -wide parking approach. A district -wide parking approach uses a combination of strategies to maximize the existing parking supply, while reducing the demand to build additional spaces. This approach is commonly applied in downtown settings to encourage walkability, foster economic growth, and strengthen the urban form. The various district -wide models that have been used across the nation are summarized below. Stillwater currently uses the Enterprise Fund (see Page 19) and Parking Benefit District model to managing parking in downtown. Embrace a district - wide parking approach • Downtown Development Authority (DDA): A typical downtown development authority oversees infrastructure projects, including parking facilities, roadway projects and physical buildings. Their overall purpose is to also increase the quality of life for residents and businesses through economic and physical revitalization of the downtown. • Enterprise Funds: An Enterprise Fund is primarily a self-supporting program that requires developers to pay a fee in lieu to fulfill their parking requirements. Collected funds go back into maintaining and operating the City's parking supply and other infrastructure projects. • Parking Benefit Districts: Typically revenue generated from parking meters or other collection methods automatically reverts back to a municipality's general fund and the place where the meter revenue is collected sees no direct benefit. A parking benefits district is a designated area in which the parking revenues raised are then reinvested back into the district for a wide range of improvements. The funds may be used to purchase smart parking meters, walking and biking infrastructure, or to pay for improvements to the public realm, such as street trees, benches, and lighting. Typically revenue collected through meters or parking kiosks is reinvested in the district, while revenue generated from parking violations is used to fund further enforcement. Parking Benefit districts not only create a new stream of funding for district improvements, but they also can help better manage parking supply and demand. Parking benefits districts support economic development and neighborhood revitalization efforts. This tool is attractive because, instead of using local tax revenue or assessments for improvements, parking benefit districts capture money from visitors. Business owners are more likely to report parking violations within parking benefit districts because violations result in lost revenue for the district. • Improvement Districts: Improvement districts are often responsible for maintaining parking operations and services in designated districts. These districts are often partnerships between municipal departments, local organizations, private developers, and private businesses. Improvement districts are financed through parking revenue, property taxes paid by property owners, or member fees. Improvement districts that manage parking communicate parking locations, rates, and typically provide flexible monthly parking options and reduced parking with merchant ticket validation. • Public -Private Partnerships:The configuration and management of public -private parking partnerships varies by the specific parking needs and demands within the district, along with the adjacent land uses. These partnerships are created to maximize the sharing of parking spaces by various users. Financing for public -private partnerships is provided through developer payments, user fees, common area maintenance charges, and the payment of a fee in lieu of providing parking spaces required by a zoning ordinance. • Transportation Management Association (TMA): A Transportation Management Association (TMA) is an organization that carefully applies selected approaches to facilitate the movement of people and goods within an area. Also called Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs) and other names, they vary widely in size, organization, membership, and services offered. TMAs allow businesses to pool their resources to support commuter transportation strategies and can act in an advocacy role with local government on behalf of its membership. I 111121 illwater. DOWNTOWN STILLWATER PARKING ENTERPRISE FUND Downtown Stillwater's district -wide parking approach best mirrors the Enterprise Fund. Funds are collected from various revenue streams that are in turn, invested back into the downtown's parking improvements and ongoing operations/maintenance. I.2019 Revenues Account 720 (Surface parking lots): (unaudited end of year) 1. Permits (residential, business, mitigation, misc.) $66,832 2. Sales for Parking Lot 1 $91,630 3. Sales for Parking Lot 2 $94,116 4. Parking enforcement ticket totals $53,573 5. Parking, events $4,600 6. Interest $6,010 7. Total parking lot revenue $316,761 Account 725 (Parking ramp): (unaudited end of year) 1. Parking permits: 61 permits (25 residential; 36 commercial) $15,341 2. Parking Permits — Lowell Inn $12,952 3. Ramp revenue (Credit Card and Cash) $86,833 4. Total parking ramp revenue $115,126 Total revenue, ramp and lots (unaudited) $431,887 II. Operating Costs 1. Parking Ramp (unaudited, no depreciation) $58,420 2. Parking Lots (unaudited, no depreciation) $159,274 3. Total operating costs $217,694 III. Balance The unaudited revenue collection in 2019 appears to have exceeded the unaudited operating costs by about $214,000. This does not including depreciation, which covers facilities replacement costs, i.e. Capital Improvements. IV. Reserve (Capital Improvement Program) As of 12/12/19 the reserve in the parking enterprise fund was $991,806.59. Approved capital expenditures for 2020 total $280,800.00. PARKING STUDY I STRATEGIES & RECOMMENDATIONS Each district -wide parking model discussed in the previous section is designed to achieve similar goals by reducing parking demand and maximizing its resources. At this time, the City of Stillwater does not need to select a preferred approach or modify its Enterprise Fund. Instead, the City should consider the various strategies used in each model to help better manage parking to support parking efficiencies. Each strategy discussed throughout this section is designed to help better manage the downtown's parking supply and demand. More importantly, the strategies were selected to help align parking needs with the various users of downtown. These strategies should be explored to their fullest potential prior to investments that focus on adding more supply. Today, there are many players that can help advance the parking strategies through direct or indirect efforts. Many of these efforts are currently tied to long-range planning, business support, parking enforcement, and the facilitation and approval of development proposals.These groups include both the public (i.e., City) and private (i.e., business) sector. Both groups should have a vested interest in implementing the study's recommendations. In that respect, the roles and responsibilities for carrying out a particular strategy are identified in each strategy. Each strategy is also paired with a paradigm (see Sidebar) generalizing implementation costs, business support, and impact in reducing demand. Diagram Summary Example: SUPPORT ti 0 UPFRONT COST This diagram would suggest the strategy being proposed is highly supported by the business community and may have a low to moderate impact in shifting parking demand. General upfront and ongoing costs associated with this strategy are low. RECOMMENDATION PARADIGM • Support: The strategies were presented to the business community. Some strategies received overwhelming support (scores towards HIGHEST), while others may need further discussion (scores towards LOWEST). • Ongoing Cost: Some strategies may require on- going costs. These cost are typically associated with staff time and resources or on -going operations and maintenance needs. Each strategy will have some form (e.g., direct or indirect) of an ongoing cost. • Upfront Cost: There is an upfront cost to implementing every strategy. These cost are typically associated with design, capital investments, staff time and resources, or startup dollars to initiate the strategy. Upfront costs can be minimal, while others may be larger investments that require long-range capital programming. • Impact: Each strategy is designed to maximize today's parking supply more efficiently and effectively. The goal is to implement strategies that have the highest impact, while being cognizant of ongoing and upfront costs. H V a SUPPORT HIGHEST MODERATE LOWEST UPFRONT COST I 11113 tillwater. Strategy #1 - Utilization Counts Stillwater should continue to monitor parking utilization in all areas of downtown. This will provide a better baseline of data for determining when a particular parking strategy should be explored or implemented. The City should establish a set schedule for when utilization counts are collected to ensure consistent reporting on an annual basis.The recommended times include 10 a.m., 12 p.m., and 6 p.m on weekdays and weekends. Counts should be collected throughout the year and during downtown events. In the long term, use of parking sensors could provide better data. This type of technology has a higher upfront cost to implement. Saturday 9:00 a.m. The demand for parking typically increases in Downtown Stillwater throughout the day. Saturday 6:00 p.m. • • • Recommendation: Implement a program to continue . parking counts at specific times and • during different seasons. • • • • • • • • . • • • • • UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: There is very little cost associated with this strategy, but has no direct impact in reducing parking demand. The strategy is primarily used to monitor parking utilization rates and to inform other strategies. Roles & Responsibilities: Utilization costs can be done by City staff and at very low cost. City's will use seasonal help, interns, or parking enforcement to conduct counts. STUDY GOALS Each strategy is designed to help achieve the following study goals. Embrace a district - wide parking approach Maximize current investments Identify low-cost/ high -benefit solutions Maximize today's parking supply PARKING STUDY I Strategy #2 - Wayfinding & Signage Wayfinding systems serve a key role well beyond responding to the need for basic navigation, identification, and information. Wayfinding elements, such as monuments, directional systems, directories, interpretive, and even regulatory signs can enrich and enhance the users experience in Downtown Stillwater and help with traffic congestion. More importantly, signage can help direct people to underutilized or unknown areas available for public parking. The study has recommended a shift in parking demand from the core to underutilized or unknown areas available for public parking. This shift should focus on wayfinding signage that directs people to the Municipal Ramp/Lot 13. To some degree, wayfinding signs are visible at the Main Street/Commerce Street intersection that direct people to the ramp. By the time a parking user reaches this intersection they have already been exposed to a number of parking options, including three hour on -street parking and large surface lots. It is important to recognize the first lots to fill up as one enters downtown are Lots 1 and 2, which both charge a nominal fee. Wayfinding signage should be strategically located near these lots that direct drivers to 2nd Street. Shifting travel patterns to 2nd Street will direct people towards the ramp and expose drivers to Lot 14, which is expanding by 39 spaces in the summer of 2020. A shift to these parking facilities will help maximize parking investments and alleviate parking stresses in the core. Overall, wayfinding signs are a simple high -benefit solution that help direct vehicles to underutilized parking facilities. Wayfinding signs for parking should also work together with other wayfinding needs that move people and not just cars. Stillwater should consider developing a wayfinding plan that helps identify pathways between key destinations and large parking reservoirs. A wayfinding plan should also evaluate existing sign clutter, while finding ways to maximize the effectiveness of wayfinding signage. Precedent Examples of Parking Wayfinding Signage Recommendation: Strategically locate wayfinding • signage that direct people to 2nd Street where they will be exposed to underutilized lots (e.g., Lot 14 and • the Municipal Ramp), while elevating parking and traffic stresses in the core. • • • • • • • • • • • • SUPPORT ~ 2 0 UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: This strategy will help shift parking demand in the core to underutilized lots at a minimal cost. Roles & Responsibilities: • The City of Stillwater is the primary agency who would implement this strategy. Coordination may need to • occur with other roadway agencies, such as MnDOT or Washington County if signs are placed within • their right-of-way. • • I 111121 ;_ $lllwater. Technology & Mobile Applications Long-term wayfinding strategies may include information signs that display the number of available parking spaces at a parking lot/ramp entrance. This type of technology can also be tied to mobile applications that inform a driver before they enter the downtown on where parking is available. These type of wayfinding applications are typically applied in settings where parking is being heavily utilized on a year-round basis and tied to parking facilities with controlled entrances/exits (e.g., gate arms). This type of technology can also have high upfront costs. There may be opportunities to retrofit the ramp with this type of technology, but should be viewed as a mid to long-term initiative. Other long-term initiatives may include mobile applications that monitor the downtown's available parking supply. These types of applications also rely on parking sensors, parking facilities that use entrance/exist controlled devices, or GPS data obtained from cellphones to report out "real-time" parking availability for a specific area. These types of applications are typically implemented in downtown settings that charge a fee for public parking. At a minimum, the City should consider using mobile friendly websites or materials that provide information on downtown's parking locations. Long-term initiatives should consider"real-time"parking availability information, but is not being recommended at this time. Recommendation: Develop mobile friendly applications that provides parking location information. G a i SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: This strategy will help better inform • downtown users were parking is located. . • • Roles & Responsibilities: . • The City of Stillwater is the primary • agency who would implement this strategy, but may need support . from a private entity to assist in • the development of a mobile application. PARKING STUDY I Strategy #3 - On -Street Time Restrictions Research determined Downtown Stillwater is the only downtown with widespread three hour on -street parking compared to 12 other precedent examples (see Table 4). Reducing on -street time restrictions will help improve parking turnover rates and better align parking spaces with the various users of downtown. For example, a service oriented district (e.g., dry cleaner, post office, and coffee shop) typically requires a higher turnover rate to accommodate customers; resulting in parking restrictions ranging between 15 minutes and 1 hour. An entertainment district, such as Downtown Stillwater, typically sees a lower turnover rate during the evening hours. Time restrictions in these types of areas can range between 2 and 4 hours. Office and business districts also experience lower turnover rates. These areas usually result in an 8 hour or more time restriction to accommodate a standard 8 hour work day. On -street parking in Downtown Stillwater should accommodate those who are looking for a quick meal or the ability to run a few errands within a short period of time. A time restriction of three hours caters to the long-term parking user in which there is ample parking options available to meet their needs. On -street parking in Downtown Stillwater should be viewed as an amenity and managed in a way that creates higher -turnover. The lack of on -street parking turnover is also contributed to the lack of parking enforcement. Today, parking enforcement ends at 6:00 p.m. A car parked on the street at 3:00 p.m. would not be subject to a ticket after 6:00 p.m. and is likely to stay parked for a longer period of time if they are familiar with the system. Some businesses have expressed concerns that downtown employees who work late shifts (e.g., 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) will take advantage of the situation resulting in negative impacts to on -street parking turnover. The business community supports a reduction in on -street time restrictions to better accommodate the short-term uses. This recommendation will also need to be balanced with stronger parking enforcement, while balancing the parking needs of employees (see Strategy #4: Enforcement &Technology and #7: Employee Parking). • • • Recommendations: Reduce on -street parking time restrictions from three hours to two hours. a 2 SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Increase parking enforcement beyond 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. SUPPORT a UPFRONT COST 0 Z Diagram Summary: This strategy will help create higher parking turnover and better align parking users with their parking needs. Roles & Responsibilities: The City of Stillwater will be . responsible for implementing • this strategy, which will require additional resources to increase . parking enforcement. Today, the majority of on -street parking in the core is limited to three hours. I 11121 ©8 "tiljwatei Strategy #4 - Enforcement & Technology Many of the strategies discussed throughout this study emphasize the use of parking enforcement and technology to better manage parking utilization. In particular, Strategy #3 discusses the need for stronger on - street parking enforcement to manage turnover rates. If the City of Stillwater takes a more active role in enforcement, it should consider the use of new technology to monitor violations and turnover rates. License Plate Recognition (LPR) software provides these benefits. LPR software includes a camera that is mounted on a parking enforcement vehicle that captures license plate numbers. The license plate number is time stamped and its location is logged with the corresponding time restriction. As parking enforcement patrols an area, the software notifies the parking officer if a violation has occurred. This type of software is commonly used by public safety or law enforcement to track stolen vehicles or persons of interest. LPR software can also be used to track and monitor parking permit users. For example, if a lot is permitted only for employee parking, LPR software can determine which vehicle is authorized to be in the lot without having to verify physical permits (e.g., window tags or stickers). This approach should be explored as part of Strategy #7: Employee Parking. The City does not owns this type of technology.The City should consider purchasing LPR software to be mounted on parking enforcement vehicles to enforce on -street time restrictions (see Strategy #3). This technology will help create efficiencies in parking enforcement and will limit the number of parking enforcement officers needed to regulate time restrictions. If the City chooses not to use this technology for parking enforcement, additional parking enforcement staff will be needed to efficiently enforce on -street time restrictions to create higher turnover rates. CHALKING - COURT CASES Recent court cases have challenged the constitutionality of "tire chalking" or putting a physical mark on a tire to measure if a car has been parked in a location longer than allowed. In the most relevant court case, Taylor v. City of Saginaw, the court ruled that chalking represents a physical trespass and an unreasonable search prohibited under the 4th Amendment without meeting the burden required for a reasonable search. While this ruling was in the 6th Circuit, and only applies to Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee, it may be prudent to move in the direction of non -marking techniques. • Recommendation: • Utilize LPR software for on -street • parking enforcement. • • • • • • • • parking turnover rates. • • The City of Stillwater is the responsible agency for • implementing this strategy, which • will require additional resources to • increase parking enforcement. 1- V a i SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: This strategy will help create higher Roles & Responsibilities: Parking enforcement is an important tool to helping balance parking turnover rates for on -street parking. PARKING STUDY I Strategy #5 - Parking Ordinances & Requirements The City of Stillwater recently updated its Comprehensive Plan, which provides direction and guidance for the future of Downtown Stillwater. As the City revisits its ordinances to come into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, it should also examine them for alignment with desired parking policies. Updates to the zoning ordinance should take into consideration the parking components that embrace a district -wide parking approach. Items for consideration include: • Conditional Use Permit: Allowing a development to be eligible for a conditional use permit, which if approved by City Council would allow a given parcel to accommodate some of their required parking in a municipal lot. Many existing developments rely on municipal lots and on -street parking. A parking study would need to be submitted by the applicant demonstrating its need and the availability of off - site parking to accommodate those needs. Parking Overlay District: Minimum and maximum parking requirements can be established through an overlay district. Stillwater has established a Downtown Parking Districts that uses parking maximums. Parking maximums are used to ensure parking is not being over built and negatively impacting the urban form.The City's parking maximums should be evaluated to determine if they align with industry standards and current parking demand (using the utilization counts) in Downtown Stillwater. • Travel Demand Management Plans (TDMP): ATDMP outlines measures to mitigate parking demand as part of the development permit process, which can result in innovative solutions that are tailored to the specific needs of an area. ATDMP would be required of the developer or property owner as part of their development application. TDM strategies for Downtown Stillwater may look to shift trips from peak period (high -demand) hours to times of the day when more parking is available or enter into shared parking agreements. Strategies for businesses may include incentives to carpool or take other modes of transportation. Strategies for residential uses may include incentives for not owning a car. Liquor Licenses and other Land Use Considerations: New land uses may generate more parking demand or increase the demand at certain hours.The City should support development that is in alignment with a long-term, successful, and vibrant downtown. This also sometimes means allowing businesses that will create more of a draw that could add more parking demand. In the short-term the City may consider methods to control the flow of these developments until parking can catch up. For example, establishments that provide liquor can generate higher peak parking demands during the evening hours. Establishing regulations that control the number of liquor licenses helps manage the current parking demand until parking strategies or building more parking catches up with demand. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Recommendation: Analyze and revise the City's zoning, subdivision, and parking ordinances to ensure they are in -line with improving the parking experience in downtown. SUPPORT 1- i UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: 0 Z o v.-I 0 0 In general, revisions to the zoning ordinance that embrace a district - wide parking approach will have a positive impact in helping manage parking more efficiently and effectively. The overall support and cost associated with a particulate ordinance update will vary. Staff time and resources will likely be needed for any of ordinance updates suggested in this strategy. Roles & Responsibilities: This strategy will need to be closely coordinated with downtown businesses and the private sector to determine the appropriate ordinance update. The City of Stillwater is the responsible agency for implementing this strategy. ©© lllwater. ©a Strategy #6 -Customer Service A visitor's first experience starts from the moment they park their car and walk to their destination. Therefore, parking should be viewed as a customer service. Offering a positive experience from a parking perspective involves a combination of strategies, such as a wayfinding signs (Strategy #2: Wayfinding), maintained parking facilities, and availability. It requires marketing materials to help inform patrons on where they can park and what the downtown has to offer. It may even include curbside valet service to allow cars to be stored further from the destination without requiring a longer walk for patrons. Recommendations for improving the parking user's experience include: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Marketing Materials: The City and local business organizations (e.g., • Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce and Main Street Stillwater . Independent Business Alliance') should work together to develop marketing materials that indicate key destinations (e.g., businesses, • restaurants and trailheads) and parking locations that are for certain users (e.g., short-term vs. long-term). This approach is a low-cost/high . benefit solution to help educate visitors on where to park. This can also • be used as an opportunity to promote and market the downtown's • businesses on those materials. . • Valet Parking: A valet service provides downtown patrons a . convenient option for parking. If managed accordingly, this strategy • can help elevate the parking pressures being experienced in the . core. Options for valet storage could occur in Lots 12 or 14, which . are underutilized during the evening hours. A shared parking • agreement would need to be administered between the business and • City. This strategy is an effective means to helping manage parking . during evening hours, while providing visitors an enhanced parking • experience. Valet service is provide by a private entity, which enters into • an agreement with the business and city. The business typically initiates this strategy • • Ongoing Maintenance: Public and privately owned parking facilities should provide a safe and clean environment. Routine maintenance (e.g., sweeping, refuge collection, crack sealing, pavement overlays, snow removal, and lighting) schedules should be followed to enhance the customer's experience (drawing visitors back into the area) and beautification of the city. Additionally, routine maintenance schedules will help extend the life -span of a parking facility before a major replacement or repair is needed. This also holds true to the users experience between a parking facility and their final destination. Regular maintenance schedules need to be made to sidewalks, in addition to shoveling after winter weather events. • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••..•..•.••••••• Diagram Summary: Marketing materials and valet parking can help manage parking more efficiently at a low-cost. Ongoing maintenance is important, but does not have any impact to parking efficiencies unless a facility becomes in such disrepair people will no longer able to park in that facility. Roles & Responsibilities: These strategies require private and public partnerships. Businesses association should take a stronger lead in developing marketing materials and initiating a valet service, if these are desired strategies to pursue from the businesses. Recommendation: Develop marketing materials that educate people on where to park. 1- a SUPPORT i UPFRONT COST Establish valet parking services with businesses that generate a higher parking demand during the evening hours. 1- u i SUPPORT UPFRONT COST 0 r, _ 00 -I o Adhere to ongoing maintenance schedules for parking facilities, in addition to sidewalks and pathways between parking facilities and destinations. SUPPORT UPFRONT COST PARKING STUDY I Strategy #7 - Employee Parking This study has recognized that some trade-offs will need to occur in order to improve the efficiencies of Downtown Stillwater's parking supply. Moving forward, the City and business community will need to accept that some people will have to park further away if they plan on spending longer periods of time in downtown. This balancing act should start with employee parking. It should be expected that employees will park further away and not in parking lots that deter from a customer's ability to park in the core. Implementing this strategy will require a strong commitment and understanding from the businesses that this shift should occur. This partnership can begin by working together to find designated areas for employee parking that alleviate parking demand in the core. A recommended approach to helping jump-start this initiative can begin by modifying the business parking permit program. Businesses and downtown employees have the option today to purchase a parking permit. Permit holders are allowed to park in designated lots longer than the posted time restriction. These lots are scattered throughout downtown. However, several permitted lots are located in the core that experience heavily utilization, while lots that are underutilized outside the core are not permitted. Permits should be restricted in lots located in the core that experience heavy utilization during peak demand. This would include Lots 4, 5, and 8 only on weekdays after 5:00 p.m. and during weekends. Employee parking by permit would still be allowed in these lots during normal weekday hours (7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). In return, the Municipal Ramp would be open to permit holders.This would require access codes that allow the permit holder to enter the ramp without having to pay an additional fee to park. In order to effectively implement this strategy, the City will need to increase parking enforcement beyond 6 p.m. (see Strategy #4: Enforcement &Technology) in the surface lots. Lots should also be designed for free employee parking during evening hours for those who do not wish to purchase a parking permit. Opportunities for these free areas could occur in Lot 12 and Lot 14. Lot 14 will be expanded by 39 parking stalls in the spring of 2020.The City could also offer discounted parking permit passes to businesses that typically see an influx of employees during the evening hours (e.g., restaurants and bars). EMPLOYEE PARKING PROGRAM PRINCIPLES. An employee parking permit program should be built around the following principles: • The program is monitored and managed by the Stillwater Parking Commission. • Businesses must make a formal request annually to the Stillwater Parking Commission to be part of the program. • The number of permits issued would be based on the size, type of business, or number of employees. • A business would agree to the following conditions: - The business must prove their operations occur during peak parking demand (i.e., evening hours and weekends). - The business owner is responsible for reporting lost or stolen access cards to the Municipal Ramp. - Access cards can be terminated by the City any given time if they are being used in inappropriately. Access cards to the Municipal Ramp would only be active during the evening hours (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Recommendation: Update the business parking program by restructuring permitted lots and time restrictions. a i SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: This strategy will help balance today's parking supply with downtown customers and employees. This strategy will need further support from the business community before moving forward. Roles & Responsibilities: The Stillwater Parking Commission will take on a new responsibility in monitoring the program, while City staff will be asked to administer the program. The business community also needs to play a role in helping educate their employees on where to park. ©© lllwater. i ©8 . Strategy 8 - Pricing The bulk of Downtown Stillwater's parking supply is free, located in the core, and structured around the long-term user's need (4 or more hours).They are heavily utilized for those reasons, which has impacted the utilization of the Municipal Ramp and other lots on the fringe. People will chose free parking and convenience over other options. This model should be flipped by pricing parking in the core where it is more convenient, while providing subsidized (free) parking outside of the core. There are precedent examples of parking lots in downtown where people are willing to pay and park. This is evident in Lots 1 and 2, which experience heaving utilization rates and charge a minimal fee. This finding serves as a precedent example for the City to consider when exploring parking fees in other areas of downtown. During the planning process, there was some appetite to retrofit surface lots in the core to pay lots. This strategy would help achieve the following benefits: • Influence consumer/parking behavior. • Shift parking demand to underutilized lots that are currently free (e.g., Lots 12 and 14). • Capture revenue to offset costs associated with parking operations and maintenance needs or reinvest those revenues back into the downtown. This strategy will continue to be an ongoing discussion. Advancing this strategy will require larger discussions with the business owners and residents of downtown. As part of these discussions, the City should consider a phased approach by converting one or two lots in the core to paid lots. Lots 3, 4 and 5 are potential options given their proximity to Lots 1 and 2, which are already pay lots. Converting a surface lot to a pay lot can be managed through various means, including controlled gates with pay stations or through mobile applications that do not require gate arms. Any one of these options can help the City control when parking rates are in effect. For example, the City may want to only change for parking during events or when parking is at its peak. It is important to recognize a pay lot should provide people the option to pay by cash, as not everyone owns a smart phone or has access to a credit or debit card. Pay Lots 1 and 2 are heavily utilized during the summer months. • • • • Recommendation: Implement a phased approach to paid parking in the surface lots located in the core areas of downtown. a i SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: Parking fees should be used in the core to help shift parking demand to the fringe and underutilized lots. Costs associated with this strategy are associated with retrofitting lots to include entrance controls and pay stations. Roles & Responsibilities: This strategy will need to be closely coordinated with the City and downtown businesses. PARKING STUDY I Strategy 9 - Event Parking Festivals and events play a large part in supporting downtown businesses. Iconic events such as Lumber Jack Days and Cruisin'on the Croix Car Show attract thousands of people to the area on an annual basis. The number of special events are growing and many of them use parking lots to accommodate vendor booths, staging areas, and food trucks. Lots 4, 8, 9, 10 and 11 are commonly used for events. Requests to temporary close these lots are done through an application process and reviewed/approved by the Stillwater Parking Commission. In many cases, the downtown's parking supply can handle a smaller event that requires the temporary closure of a lot. Larger events that require the closure of more than one lot and attract a large number of eventgoers have utilized shuttle services between the downtown and off site parking lots located at nearby schools parks, or churches. At times, event parking has spilled into adjacent neighborhoods. Residents have grown accustom to these impacts. Event parking has been managed fairly well over the years. However, the St. Croix River has been subject to more spring floods that result in the closure of parking lots. These lots are typically relied on for spring events. As a result, event organizers are being asked to have an alternative plan in place. Establishing an alternative can be a challenge for the applicant. Ideally, the alternative keeps the event near businesses and with a view of the St. Croix River. Unfortunately, events that coincide with a flood may be forced to relocate to areas that do not provide these opportunities. Alternative event areas include other public and private parking lots near City Hall and the Historical Court House, or to a larger extent, the Washington County Government Center. Keeping an event downtown with limited parking options (as a result of flooding) will need to be balanced with other parking/traffic mitigation plans. For example, an event may need to include off site parking and shuttle service. These responsibilities should be placed on the event organizer. There are multiple factors to consider when developing a parking/traffic management plan for an event: • Number of parking spaces required and available for the event. • An alternative plan if event space is not available because of flooding or other unforeseen circumstances. • The reduction in parking as a result of the event. • Traffic control/enforcement/signage required for the event. • Educational/marketing materials to promote alternative parking options/traffic routes. This information may be challenging for the applicant to obtain. In some respect, smaller event organizer may not be or have even considered these items. City staff and the Stillwater Parking Commission can be a resource in providing options or ideas. The City should develop formalized event plans for different types of events for the Stillwater Parking Commission's consideration when reviewing/ approving event request. Events are common activities that occur in Downtown Stillwater . . • • Recommendation: Establish event parking plans for applicants to use when proposing an event. SUPPORT UPFRONT COST Diagram Summary: The event type and parking/traffic mitigation plan will vary from a impact and cost perspective. Roles & Responsibilities: The City and Stillwater Parking Commission will be responsible for providing guidance to applicants when developing event parking plans. Implementing the parking plan during an event will primarily be the responsibility of the applicant or City fees will be associated with the event to assist in their needs. 11.-1 MOW ©®lllwater. NEXT STEPS The parking strategies discussed throughout this study were agreed upon by the Stillwater Parking Commission as viable options in helping manage today's parking supply more efficiently. Some strategies are more viable options today, while others may require further study or consideration. Below provides a summary of these findings and recommendations for next steps. The next steps have taken into consideration, to some degree, the recent public health crisis (as of July 2020) that has impacted parking demand in Downtown Stillwater. Strategy #1 - Utilization Counts Strongly Disagree I Disagree I Neutral I Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps Continue to monitor parking utilization on an annual basis to inform the other strategies. Findings will provide a foundation for making adjustments to time restrictions, business parking programs, and pricing. Time Horizon Conduct utilization counts on an annual basis. Strategy #2 - Wayfinding & Signage Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps Strategically locate wayfinding signs that direct people to 2nd Street where they will be exposed to underutilized lots (e.g., Lot 14 and the Municipal Ramp). A more strategic wayfinding and signage plan should be developed for Downtown Stillwater. This plan will need to balance wayfinding and signage needs for not only parking, but for key destinations (e.g., businesses, trails, parks, and attractions). An effective wayfinding and signage plan will also look for ways to reduce sign clutter, while taking into account Downtown Stillwater's historical features. Time Horizon Install parking wayfinding sings within 6 months. Develop a comprehensive Downtown Stillwater wayfinding and signage plan within the next 1 to 2 years. Strategy #3 - On Street Time Restriction Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps At a minimum, convert three hour on -street time restrictions to two hours. There is some appetite to reduce areas to one hour, but further study is needed to determine the appropriate locations. Time Horizon Implement two hour on -street time restrictions within the next 6 months. PARKING STUDY I Strategy #4 - Enforcement & Technology Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps Parking enforcement is viewed as a positive and negative strategy in helping manage parking. It is viewed as a viable options in helping manage on -street parking and turnover, while some view parking enforcement as deterrent to attracting visitors. It is important to recognize parking enforcement is part of the solution in helping mange parking efficiencies and should continue to be used as a measure to ensure on -street parking spaces are turning over. At a minimum, the City should invest in License Plate Recognition (LPR) software to help with parking enforcement efficiencies. Changing the City's current policies on parking enforcement will require further discussion. Time Horizon Strategy #5 - Parking Ordinances & Requirements Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral I Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps A second phase of the study should consider a more detailed analysis of the City's zoning, subdivision, and parking ordinances to ensure they are in -line with improving the parking experience in downtown. This analysis should take into consideration curb side management and the unknowns in parking demand, as a result of the recent public health crisis. These unknowns have impacted how people travel to and from downtown. Time Horizon To be determined. . Strategy #6 - Customer Service Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps Develop marketing materials that educate people on where to park. Implementing this strategy should be led by local business groups (e.g., Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce and Main Street Stillwater Independent Business Alliance°). Marketing materials should leverage online tools and mobile friendly applications. Time Horizon Coordinate next steps with local business groups, as businesses return to normal after the public health crisis. Strategy #7 - Employee Parking Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps The business parking permit program should be refined to better address employee parking needs during the evening hours. Implementing this step will require on -going coordination and collaboration with businesses. At this point in time, the public health crisis has impacted business operations. As a result, Downtown Stillwater has been experiencing lower than normal parking utilization rates, which suggests from a parking perspective , there is no parking issue at the moment. Time Horizon Begin coordination and collaboration efforts with businesses when parking demand returns to normal. Strategy #8 - Pricing Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps There is support to expand parking fees throughout Downtown Stillwater, if it is done at incremental steps. Implementing this strategy will require public outreach and education to demonstrate how collected fees will be used. Revenue collected from parking fees should be redirected back into the downtown for capital improvements and maintenance needs.This approach will help support a district -wide parking model. Implementing this strategy should be put on hold until parking demand returns to normal. Time Horizon To be implemented a year after parking demand returns to normal. Strategy #9 - Event Parking Strongly Disagree I Disagree Neutral Agree I Strongly Agree Next Steps The City should create a series of event plans (based on the event size and type) that address their parking needs. These plans would include a contingency for flooding events that may result in parking lots being offline. Developing these plans will help the Parking Commission and event organizers understand their options and the mitigation measures needed to address loading/unloading zones, traffic, and parking. Time Horizon Develop plans within 1 to 2 years. . . PARKING STUDY I „Ado SPED LIMIT I ©8 : fi11water. City of *tt{Ytnater, fninne5ota ((hadarrudian WHEREAS, Infants Remembered In Silence, Inc. (IRIS) and many other nonprofit organizations work with thousands of parents all over Minnesota and across the United States who have experienced the death of a child during pregnancy through early childhood; and WHEREAS, Many of these parents live in, deliver in, have a child die in, or a bury a child in our community; and WHEREAS, Infants Remembered In Silence (IRIS), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, was founded 1987, to offer support for parents whose child/children died from miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, stillbirth, neo-natal death, birth defects, sudden unexplained death of a child (SUDC), sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), illness, accidents, and all other types of infants and early childhood death; and WHEREAS, Bereaved parents around the world remember their children annually on October 15 with a candle lighting at 7 pm. Some will remember their child/children in their homes, while others will remember them in small gatherings around the state, across the nation, and around the world; and this would unify these parents in tribute to their children; and WHEREAS, In 1988, President Ronald Reagan proclaimed October as National Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness month; and NOW THEREFORE, I, Ted Kozlowski, Mayor of the City of Stillwater, do hereby proclaim October 15th, 2021 as - PREGNANCY AND INFANTS LOSS REMEMBRANCE DAY - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Stillwater to be affixed this 5th day of October, 2021. ... 5 if:11;:s * • 17. .•;5%": a ltlayor City of *tt{Ytnater, fninne5ota J WHEREAS, the City of Stillwater is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in and visiting our community; and WHEREAS, fire is a serious public safety concern both locally and nationally, and homes are the locations where people are at greatest risk from fire; and WHEREAS, smoke alarms sense smoke well before you can, alerting you to danger in the event of fire in which you may have as little as 2 minutes to escape safely; and WHEREAS, working smoke alarms cut the risk of dying in reported home fires in half; and WHEREAS, Stillwater residents should be sure everyone in the home understands the sounds of the alarms and knows how to respond; and WHEREAS, Stillwater residents who have planned and practiced a home fire escape plan are more prepared and will therefore be more likely to survive a fire; and WHEREAS, Stillwater residents will make sure their smoke and CO alarms meet the needs of all their family members, including those with sensory or physical disabilities; and WHEREAS, the Stillwater Fire Department is dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and protection education; and WHEREAS, the 2021 Fire Prevention WeekTM theme, "Learn the Sounds of Fire SafetyTM," effectively serves to remind us it is important to learn the different sounds of smoke and carbon monoxide alarms. NOW THEREFORE, I, Ted Kozlowski, by virtue of the authority vested in me, as Mayor of the City of Stillwater, do hereby proclaim October 3-9, 2021 as Fire Prevention Week throughout the City, and I urge all the people of Stillwater to "Learn the Sounds of Fire Safety'; and to support the many public safety activities and efforts of the Stillwater Fire Department. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Stillwater to be affixed this this 5th day of October, 2021. .Mayor Cite of *tt{Ytnater, fliinne5ota Jftacearruttiun WHEREAS, G.eri Freels is a longtime resident of Stillwater s Oak Glen neighborhood andpast president of the St. Croix yacht Club auxiliary; and WHEREAS, she and her husband, ,Frank Freels, past commodore of the St. Croix yacht Club, were avid St. Croix river boaters; and WHEREAS, Geri recognizes the public benefit to river access for all people; and WHEREAS, Geri desires sharing her Cove of the St. Croix River with the Stillwater area community; and WHEREAS, honoring her and Franks legacy, Geri has generously donatedsi,000,000 to the City of Stillwater to be usedfor the conversion of the former .2liple residence in Lumberjack Landing into a multi -use public building. NOW THEREFORE, I, sec Xozlowski, wlayor of the City of Stillwater, do hereby proclaim October 5th, 2021 as ^' je'd Eiteeb Dati J IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Stillwater to be affixed this this 5th day of October, 2021. ,,•' STILL r•►f _ um * • •�''•, fINN F SQ%%%%% .Mayor ti1Iwater The Birthplace of Minnesota 216 4th Street N, Stillwater, MN 55082 651-430-8800 www.ci.stillwater.mn.us CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES September 21, 2021 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. Mayor Kozlowski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor Kozlowski, Councilmembers Collins, Junker, Odebrecht, Polehna Absent: None Staff present: City Administrator McCarty City Attorney Land City Clerk Wolf Community Development Director Gladhill City Planner Wittman Finance Director Provos Fire Chief Glaser Police Chief Mueller Public Works Director Sanders Assistant City Engineer Abdullah PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Kozlowski led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. RECOGNITIONS OR PRESENTATIONS Certificates of Appreciation - Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Program Projects Councilmember Polehna explained that the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Committee of Washington County coordinated a project to landscape the yard of a disabled veteran. He thanked the following individuals and groups for their donations and assistance: Stillwater Elks; Coach Greg Zanon and the Stillwater High School Hockey Team; Kevin Mann, KLM Farms Inc.; Lake Elmo Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Program and Wildflower Neighborhood; Chris Ryberg, Leading Edge Landscaping; and Tom Magnafici, Water Works Irrigation. He also recognized Stillwater VFW Post 323 Auxiliary for their generous contribution of $500 toward the National Guard Picnic. Proclamation - United Way Mayor Kozlowski read a proclamation designating October 4-8 as United Way Week. Superintendent Lansfeldt, Stillwater Schools 2021 Levy Referendum Superintendent Lansfeldt showed a presentation explaining the 2021 Levy Referendum and the two ballot questions: 1) Replacement levy to maintain quality learning; and 2) Technology levy to provide kids the tools they need to learn. The tax impact on the average homeowner would be $11.50 more per month if voters approve both questions. City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Acceptance of Donation for Conversion of Lumberjack Landing Building City Planner Wittman shared that Stillwater resident Geri Freels is donating $1 million for the conversion of the Aiple residence to a park building. Ms. Freels will donate $800,000 in 2021 and $200,000 in the form of a charitable trust, payable to the City of Stillwater upon Ms. Freels' death. Mayor Kozlowski conveyed the City's tremendous gratitude for Ms. Freels' generosity. Motion by Councilmember Polehna, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adopt Resolution 2021-125, A Resolution Authorizing the City of Stillwater to Accept a Donation from Geri Freels for the Conversion of the Aiple Residence to a Park Building for Public Use. All in favor. OPEN FORUM Mary Harold, Third Street North, asked the Council to consider allowing golf carts and UTVs on all City streets. Mayor Kozlowski noted that a state highway runs through downtown and there are many County roads in the City, which may have different rules, making it more challenging. Police Chief Mueller stated there are a couple existing permits that specifically designate what streets may be used. The Department would have safety concerns about topography and so on, but will continue to look at the issue more broadly. STAFF REPORTS Public Works Director Sanders reported that bicycle racks have been installed downtown. Councilmembers Polehna and Junker thanked the Public Works Department for the pickleball courts at Northland Park. Police Chief Mueller recognized Detective Sandra Vetsch who works with Stillwater students. He stated the Public Safety team will participate in a Law Enforcement Torch Run on September 22 downtown. He updated the Council on interactions with local groups. Fire Chief Glaser noted Fire Prevention Week October 3-9 with an open house and Blood Drive October 9. Councilmember Junker praised the painting of the fire hydrants. Finance Director Provos stated the department is planning to have the sewer/water bills be combined as of January. Community Development Director Gladhill stated the Downtown Parking Commission will meet with the Council October 5. There will be an EDA workshop October 19. He provided updates on Bridgeview Park and the Chestnut Street Plaza project. Temporary outdoor seating permits expire November 1. City Administrator McCarty provided a COVID-19 workplace update. OSHA will notify entities that have more than 100 employees whenever vaccine regulations are implemented. CONSENT AGENDA September 7, 2021 regular and recessed meeting minutes Payment of Bills Page 2 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Background Checks Ordinance Amendment - Ordinance 2nd Reading CPC Case 2021-30 Zoning Text Amendment for Creation of a Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District - Ordinance 2nd Reading CPC Case 2021-47 Zoning Text Amendment to allow an Emergency Medical Services Garage to be located in the BP -I zoning district - Ordinance 2nd Reading Fire Code Ordinance Amendment - Ordinance 2nd Reading Health & Dental Group Insurance for 2022 - Resolution Nuisance Ordinance - Ordinance 2nd Reading OSHA and Safety Training Agreement with SafeAssure - Resolution Purchase Request of Ceiling Microphones for Conference Room 213 Sanitary Sewer Adjustments Temporary Liquor License for Valley Chamber Chorale Temporary Liquor License for Washington County Courthouse Washington County Recycling Grant Incentive Funding Agreement Appointing 2021 General Election Judges - Resolution Amending 2021 Fee Schedule - Resolution Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Collins, to adopt the Consent Agenda. All in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS CPC Case 2020-60 on the proposed establishment of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 14 within Development District No. 1 and the proposed adoption of a TIF Plan for 200 Chestnut Street Community Development Director Gladhill stated that on May 4, 2021, the City Council approved a series of applications related to the proposed 200 Chestnut Apartment Development, a 4-story, 61-unit apartment with 72 underground parking stalls. The City is now reviewing a request for Tax Increment Financing (TIF). The Developer is requesting assistance in the amount of $2.2M (net present value) paid over 16 years. Adjusted for inflation over the life of the District (4% annually), total increment paid to the project is approximately $3.2M. A parking mitigation fee to mitigate the 39 parking space deficit was negotiated with the developer and was included in the Tax Increment Financing request. But -for this assistance, this project in this capacity would not likely move forward. He explained how TIF works, outlined the unique extraordinary costs associated with this project, and summarized the protections for the City. The City Council will have associated actions to take on the TIF Agreement and Development Agreement at a future meeting, once the TIF Plan is approved. The City Council Tax Committee (Councilmembers Junker and Polehna) recommends approval of the Tax Increment Financing Plan in the amount of $2.2M (net present value) for a period of 16 years. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. Ari Parritz, Reuter Walton, representing the developer, thanked the Council and staff for their efforts. He stated groundbreaking is targeted for this winter with opening a year later. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public hearing. Page 3 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Councilmember Odebrecht pointed out that taxes will be paid on the project regardless of the use of TIF, and the "but -for" test allows the City to have a project that will help meet 2040 housing needs as well as helping fund construction of a future parking ramp. Councilmembers Polehna and Junker commended the development team and the bond counsel on the negotiation process. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adopt Resolution 2021-130, Resolution Approving the Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and Establishing Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 14 Within Development District No. 1 and Approving the Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor; and Authorizing an Interfund Loan. All in favor. Project 2019-08 Assessment Hearing for the Neal Avenue Improvement Phase 2 Project Assistant City Engineer Abdullah stated that Phase Two of the Neal Avenue Improvement Project is near completion with only the final layer of pavement and striping remaining to be done next year. The feasibility estimate for the project was $1,854,788 and the final project cost is estimated to be $1,771,677. There were slight variations in the final assessment amounts. The appraisals were slightly higher than the estimated assessments. Staff recommends that the Council hold the assessment hearing, adopt the assessment roll, and change the payoff term for properties with assessments over $12,000 to 15 years. Councilmember Polehna asked about variations in assessment amounts; and Mr. Abdullah answered that some properties were assessed only for street work, not sewer and water. Properties that were previously on wells and septic systems get assessed 100% for watermain and sewer main. Mayor Kozlowski opened the public hearing. Susan Eskierka, 7959 Neal Avenue North, explained she is subdividing her property into two sections to place it on the market, so she previously asked for a firm number on the assessment for the second lot. She was given an assessment estimate of $12,000 in writing in June and now instead of a total combination of $33,000, it went up to $39,000. She feels the $6,000 increase is unfair. Mr. Abdullah stated he made an error in doing the initial calculation and went by the value charged to the properties for hookup. It is the new buyer who will apply for the permit to connect, and the cost will be charged at that time. Public Works Director Sanders added that the property owner will be charged to hook up to City sewer and water. There will be additional SAC and WAC charges. The $17,000 would be due at the time a new property owner gets a building permit. Mayor Kozlowski closed the public hearing and pointed out the assessments account for only about 20% of the project costs due to other funding. Motion by Councilmember Collins, seconded by Councilmember Odebrecht, to adopt Resolution 2021-131, Adopting Assessment for Neal Avenue Improvement Project - Phase Two Project 2019-08, L.I. 430. All in favor. Page 4 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 UNFINISHED BUSINESS CPC Case 2021-16 Right of Entry Approval for Lot 4 Block 11 Sabin's Addition to Stillwater City Planner Wittman reported that in April of this year, the Council heard a request from Tyler Morris for encroachment into the platted but undeveloped William Street North right- of-way with a private driveway. The Council tabled consideration of the agreement until utility extensions were determined. Mr. Morris is now seeking approval of right -of -entry for the construction of a private driveway, raingarden and utilities to be installed in the platted but undeveloped William Street North right-of-way. While this request is not common, this is the best mechanism to use to allow the private property owner to access his legal, non- conforming lot of record. If the City denied the right -of -entry, the owner would not be able to improve the property. Thus, staff is recommending the Council approve the right -of -entry request. Property owner Tyler Morris thanked staff for their assistance. He expressed extreme frustration about the process, saying he understood he would be here today to complete the driveway encroachment. He feels the driveway entry agreement is good only for 180 days and will accomplish nothing because in 180 days, the City has the ability to deny the encroachment and make him pull out the improvements done to that point. He reviewed the history of his interactions with the City. On Friday he heard it was going to be right of entry and not the encroachment he had been working for since July 2020. He submitted a legal description today as requested, but it is not in tonight's agenda packet. City Attorney Land stated that the Council authorized an encroachment agreement for an unopened right of way in April. City staff did not hear anything from Mr. Morris until September and suddenly his emergency became the City's emergency. Staff must make sure the City is protected. It is not possible to finalize an encroachment agreement with the legal description that protects the City in a few hours time. It will be done as soon as construction plans are submitted to the City and approved. Mr. Morris apologized for the delay in getting surveys to the City. Mayor Kozlowski asked if the encroachment agreement or right of entry approval help speed things along; and Ms. Wittman replied the right of entry would allow Mr. Morris to access the site and start constructing improvements. The encroachment agreement could come back before the Council as early as the next meeting. She apologized that she indicated to Mr. Morris that if staff had that legal description, the encroachment agreement might be on tonight's agenda. Ms. Land stated she is willing to review the legal description in time for the next Council meeting, solely for the driveway and the raingarden, not the other utilities. Ms. Wittman added that Mr. Morris understands that staff prefers to enter the encroachment agreement after the utilities are installed in order to have "as -built" depictions exactly where the utilities are located. So there will be three agreements: right of entry (tonight), encroachment agreement (in two weeks), and a deed restricted document tied to property in perpetuity. After all utilities are installed, Mr. Morris would come back with an "as -built" survey for the utilities for another encroachment agreement specifically for the utilities. Page 5 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Motion by Councilmember Odebrecht, seconded by Councilmember Collins, to adopt Resolution 2021-137, A Resolution Approving a Right of Entry Agreement Relating to Landowner Improvements Associated with Lot 4, Block 11, Sabin's Addition CPC Case No. 2021- 16. All in favor. NEW BUSINESS Potential Fence Violation at 602 Churchill St W Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the City received a complaint that a six-foot fence was being built in the front yard of the property at 602 Churchill Street West. City records did not indicate that a fence permit had been approved. On August 27, 2021, Zoning Administrator Tait confirmed there was in fact a new six-foot fence built in the front yard which was actually constructed in the City Right -of -Way (ROW) along the edge of the sidewalk. Staff sent the property owner a letter requesting that they remove the fence, or shorten the height of the fence and submit a fence permit. Subsequently, the property owner called to explain that they were only replacing a fence that had been there since they purchased the house decades ago. Staff is seeking guidance from the Council on how to proceed. If it remains in the ROW, a ROW encroachment agreement should be initiated. Councilmember Junker confirmed the fence has been there 40+ years. He stated there are many steps, porches and fences near the ROW in the neighborhood. He pointed out the fence is not blocking the house but appears to be more in the side yard. City Attorney Land stated property owners need to understand it is in the City ROW and if the City needs to get onto the property the fence could be torn down. Community Development Director Gladhill acknowledged some code cleanup is needed. Motion by Councilmember Collins, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to direct staff to prepare right of way encroachment agreement with a clause allowing the fence to be six feet but the next time the fence is reconstructed or changed, it should be in compliance. All in favor. Sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A Elizabeth Bergman, Baker Tilly, explained the proposed bond sale of $2.7 million General Obligation Bonds for street improvements at a .7% interest rate. Motion by Councilmember Odebrecht, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adopt Resolution 2021-132, Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $2,760,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A, Providing for Their Issuance and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof. All in favor. 2022 Preliminary Budget Review City Administrator McCarty stated that based on discussion at the September 7 budget work session, the City Council directed staff to adjust the Preliminary 2022 Budget to include certain revenue increases, health insurance cost reductions, increase funding for a Fire Department study, increase the Library levy to 3% over the 2021 levy and include funding for the wellness incentive program. Based on those directives and discussion, there are two options for the updated Preliminary 2022 Budget: Option 1 includes a proposed tax levy adjustment of +6.07% incorporating the items noted above, while Option 2 also includes Page 6 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 adding minor computer equipment costs to the operating budget (a long-term goal for the City to be compliant with GAAP accounting standards), slightly increasing the levy to +6.54% over 2021. Following additional discussion, the Council must adopt the Proposed 2022 Budget, Proposed 2022 Tax Levy, and set the Truth in Taxation meeting date. Both options will maintain a balanced 2022 budget. Finance Director Provos discussed the tax impacts of the Proposed 2022 Tax Levy under Options 1 and 2. Councilmember Polehna noted the library budget seems to keep going up $60,000 every year. Councilmember Collins responded that at the last Library Board meeting it was noted with a 100+-year old building, funding needs to be maintained in the event of an emergency fix. Mr. McCarty acknowledged the Library did not have a large fund balance to draw from for some of the requests for big ticket items, for instance the 2022 roof replacement. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Odebrecht, to adopt Tax Levy Option 2, by adopting Resolution 2021-133, Adopting the Proposed Tax Levy for the Payable Year 2022, Resolution 2021-134, Adopting the Proposed Budget Appropriations for the Year 2022, and Resolution 2021-135, Setting Payable 2022 Truth in Taxation Public Meeting. All in favor. Consider Offer to Purchase MnDOT Property at 14100 60th St N (TH36/Greeley) Community Development Director Gladhill explained that the Minnesota Department of Transportation has offered to sell a one acre parcel at the northeast intersection of TH 36 and Greeley Street for $367,000. Staff believes there is merit to this acquisition, but feels it is not critical to obtain this property. If directed to move forward, staff would identify pooled TIF Dollars in the form of an internal loan to be paid back at the time of sale. Councilmember Junker commented that, from an EDA standpoint, it may be beneficial to own this parcel. However there may be some potential environmental issues per the staff report. He would have no problem delaying this until the newly formed EDA meets. Mr. Gladhill stated there has been some environmental review and soil borings. No problems were found, but there was an odor detected by the tester. There is no sense of urgency to move forward. The other side of the question is, what would be allowed to be there per zoning, that the City would be able to deny if the City owned the land. He agreed to do more homework on what works there, environmental findings, what would be allowed there, and potential access, and bring the issue back before the Council in the future. Potential Home Occupation Violation at 922 William St N Mr. Gladhill reported that at the September 7, 2021 City Council meeting, the Council received a complaint about a home occupation being a neighborhood nuisance. The property has a home occupation permit to operate a landscaping company, with conditions concerning outdoor storage and noise. He provided a detailed history of the enforcement efforts. The plan is to cite the occupation for a couple of infractions regarding blade sharpening and some dumping of debris, but if Council wants to proceed with full revocation through the process of a public hearing, it may so direct staff. Page 7 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Mayor Kozlowski remarked that he drives by this site every day and has not seen lots of vehicles or anything that appears to be a nuisance. He agreed with the suggestion to cite blade sharpening and dumping, before proceeding with any harsher mechanism. Mr. Gladhill noted staff also is requesting guidance on the general appropriateness of certain Home Occupations in residential areas. This issue will be considered in light of how the administrative citations can be used as a tool for nuisances. If that does not work in the future, the Council may want to look at a policy change. United Way City Campaign Mr. McCarty stated that the City's Wellbeing Program Committee chose to move forward with a United Way Washington County East employee giving campaign. Staff recommends approval of a resolution approving the campaign. Motion by Councilmember Junker, seconded by Councilmember Polehna, to adopt Resolution 2021-136, Approving United Way Washington County East City of Stillwater Employee Giving Campaign. All in favor. COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS Councilmember Polehna requested authorization to fundraise for downtown wintertime events. Consensus was to allow him to fundraise. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Collins, seconded by Councilmember Junker, to adjourn. All in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk Resolution 2021-125, A Resolution Authorizing the City of Stillwater to Accept a Donation from Geri Freels for the Conversion of the Aiple Residence to a Park Building for Public Use Resolution 2021-126, Approving 2022 Health and Dental Insurance Premiums and City Contribution Resolution 2021-127, Approving Safeassure Consultants, Inc., Annual Service Agreement Resolution 2021-128, Appointing Election Judges and Fixing Compensation for the 2021 General Election Resolution 2021-129, Resolution Amending Resolution 2021-002 Adopting 2021 Fee Schedule Resolution 2021-130, Resolution Approving the Modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and Establishing Tax Increment Page 8 of 9 City Council Meeting September 21, 2021 Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 14 Within Development District No. 1 and Approving the Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor; and Authorizing an Interfund Loan Resolution 2021-131, Adopting Assessment for Neal Avenue Improvement Project - Phase Two Project 2019-08, L.I. 430 Resolution 2021-132, Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Competitive Negotiated Sale of $2,760,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021A, Providing for Their Issuance and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof Resolution 2021-133, Adopting the Proposed Tax Levy for the Payable Year 2022 Resolution 2021-134, Adopting the Proposed Budget Appropriations for the Year 2022 Resolution 2021-135, Setting Payable 2022 Truth in Taxation Public Meeting Resolution 2021-136, Approving United Way Washington County East City of Stillwater Employee Giving Campaign Resolution 2021-137, A Resolution Approving a Right of Entry Agreement Relating to Landowner Improvements Associated with Lot 4, Block 11, Sabin's Addition CPC Case No. 2021-16 Ordinance 1170, An Ordinance Amending Stillwater City Code Chapter 31-325 Allowable Uses In Non -Residential Districts Ordinance 1171, An Ordinance Creating Stillwater City Code Chapter 31-324.2, Neighborhood Commercial And Chapter 31-325, Allowable Uses In Non - Residential Districts Ordinance 1172, An Ordinance Amending The Stillwater City Code Section 22-12 Entitled Background Checks Ordinance 1173, An Ordinance Amending Stillwater City Code Chapter 23 Regarding The Regulation And Enforcement Of The Minnesota State Fire Code Ordinance 1174, An Ordinance Amending Sections 38-6 And 38-7 Regarding Nuisances And Section 58 Regarding Enforcement Officers Who Can Issue Administrative Citations Page 9 of 9 Page 1 CITY OF STILLWATER LIST OF BILLS Action Rental Inc. Advance Auto Parts Advanced Graphix Inc. Advanced Sportswear AMI Consulting Engineers PA AT&T Mobility Bailey Nurseries Inc Bald Eagle Builders Barck Michael J Bell Excavating BHE Community Solar Boyer Trucks Brueghel Judith CDI CDW Government Inc. Cintas Corporation City of Maplewood City of St. Paul Comcast Creative Homes Inc Cub Foods Dalco Dog Waste Depot ECM Publishers Fastenal Company FBI - LEEDA Felsch Chris FleetPride Gimple Wendy Golden Expert Services Guardian Supply Holiday Companies Holiday Credit Office I/O Solutions Inc. Ice Sports Industry Inspectron Inc Kirvida Fire Inc. LeVander Gillen Miller PA Loftier Companies Lone Oak Companies Inc Mansfield Oil Company McCormack Classic Construction Menards Metro Sales Inc. Michael Lee Inc Mixing trailer and concrete Equipment repair supplies Graphics 20218 White Durango Uniforms Riverbank stabilization Cell phone Trees Grading Escrow Refund Plan review Replace hydrant Solar Energy Equipment repair supplies Reimburse for tablecloths LaserFiche annual support & updates Scada system upgrade APC Back -UPS Uniforms service Training site use Training TV Internet & Voice Grading Escrow Refund Pancake breakfast Tissue EZ tie bags Publications Supplies Training Reimburse for Leadership in the Valley app Supplies STHR Refund Janitor Service Uniforms Vehicle washes Fuel National Firefighter Selection Inventory Skater Membership Inspections Pumper Truck Service Professional services Copier lease Bill processing for water bills Fuel Grading Escrow Refund - 1462 Monterey Ct Supplies Copier Lease Grading Escrow Refund 752.00 227.43 82.00 1,621.75 7,235.00 83.85 2,663.70 1,500.00 417.61 8,300.00 6,127.11 119.22 25.71 15,063.00 478.73 660.86 1,000.00 250.00 480.93 1,500.00 257.12 559.40 119.77 118.75 10.58 4,170.00 25.00 546.23 300.00 3,700.00 334.89 270.00 49.16 177.00 180.00 260.00 240.00 15,362.48 15.72 1,683.84 8,788.22 1,500.00 2,170.04 44.00 4,500.00 Miller Excavating MN Dept of Transportation MN Fire Srv. Cert. Board Nesco Specialty Rentals Northern Technologies Office Depot OnSite Sanitation Pioneer Press St. Paul Postmaster Praxair Linde Gas & Equipment Quill Corporation Rehn Code Consulting Services Riedel) Shoes Inc. Ries Farms LLC SEH Inc Simplifile LC Stillwater Motor Company T.A. Schifsky and Sons Taylor Electric Text-Em-All TKDA Tri-State Bobcat Twin City Fireplace & Stone Uline Inc Valley Trophy Inc. Vinco Inc Washington County Public Safety Radio Water Works Plumbing & Heating LLC Xcel Energy LIBRARY Amazon Business Baker and Taylor Blackstone Audio Brodart Co Comcast Educational Development Co Kaericher Jodi Koegel Christian M Loffler Companies Master Mechanical Inc. Menards Midwest Tape Tan Ni Uline Inc Class 5 Material testing and inspection Recertification Equipment repair supplies Professional services Office supplies Portable Restroom Newspaper Newsletter Postage Cylinders Office supplies Plan Review Skates Dirt disposal 2021 Telecommunication Services CPC 2021-41 Easement Vacation Vehicle service Asphalt Equipment repair supplies Subscription Chestnut St Civic Plaza Equipment repair supplies Refund of duplicate charge Janitorial supplies Name plates Timber fender system 800 Radio user fees Backflow repair Energy Materials Materials Materials Materials Internet - September Materials Staff Reimbursement Materials Copier/Printer Preventative Maintenance Supplies Materials Programs Supplies Page 2 96.76 641.57 700.00 259.53 250.00 235.23 2,647.00 110.09 1,744.10 60.85 131.48 2,883.14 237.16 287.52 623.66 50.25 41.74 1,548.27 2,347.00 167.90 26,023.90 72.02 55.50 664.23 25.00 97,495.60 10,802.16 773.75 46,886.32 98.34 114.61 480.83 3,072.19 188.06 86.94 100.00 196.00 464.46 1,226.00 19.43 882.58 350.00 236.20 City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- ADOPTING DELINQUENT PARKING MITIGATION FEES (L.I. Project #00080) WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Stillwater to certify to the County the delinquent parking mitigation fees. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, which the attached list constitutes the delinquent parking mitigation fees and is hereby levied as an assessment against those parcels and the total amount is $160. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of September, 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk City of Stillwater 2021 Certification of Delinquent Parking Mitigation Fees For Collection with the 2022 Property Taxes L.I. Project #00080 Term: 1 Year Rate 10% PID CERTIFICATION AMOUNT 28.030.20.41.0006 $160.00 TOTAL: $160.00 City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- ADOPTING DELINQUENT CLEANUP SERVICES CHARGES (L.I. Project #00040) WHEREAS, it is the policy of the City of Stillwater to certify to the County the delinquent cleanup service charges. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Stillwater, Minnesota, which the attached list constitutes the delinquent cleanup service charges and is hereby levied as an assessment against the parcel and the total amount is $3,040.00. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of September, 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk City of Stillwater 2021 Certification of Delinquent Clean Up Services For Collection with the 2022 Property Taxes L.I. Project #00040 Term: 1 Year Rate 10% PID CERTIFICATION AMOUNT 21.030.20.34.0158 3,040.00 TOTAL: $3,040.00 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council From: Shawn Sande , �rcctor of Public Works Date. October 1, 2021 Subject: Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) System Project Project 2021-07 DISCUSSION: At the request of the Fire Department, staff has been looking in to the installation of EVP system on the traffic signals at Myrtle and Main and Nelson and Main. EVP systems allow emergency vehicles to clear and stop approaching traffic at intersections for quick and safe passage through the intersection. Plans were completed by TKDA and approved by Minnesota DOT State Aid office . We received two quotes for the project with Taylor Electric submitting the low quote of $26,701.00. This project qualifies for use of Municipal State Aid Funds and would funded entirely with these funds, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council approve Taylor Electric for the Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Project and enter into an agreement. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with recommendation, they should pass a motion approving the quotes and approving Taylor Electric for the Emergency Vehicle Preemption System Project and enter into an agreement. Sfflvatet, Administration TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Tom McCarty, City Administrator Donna Robole, Human Resources Manager DATE: October 1, 2021 SUBJECT: 2022 Employee Group Health Insurance Opt Out Option BACKGROUND The City of Stillwater's Labor Management Insurance Work Group evaluated an opt -out pilot program concept for 2020 and found that the City may experience annual net savings in premiums paid for employee health insurance. Annual net savings were dependent on the number of employees that chose the opt -out program. Council approved the pilot program for 2020, and extended it to 2021. Nine employees opted out of the City's health insurance, and net savings for 2020 were $40,716; and $49,491 for 2021. The estimated net savings for 2022 would be generated by individuals who may enroll into their partner's 2022 group health insurance plan and then waive City of Stillwater coverage. The Affordable Care Act sets the potential maximum monthly cash payment at 50 percent of the lowest cost premium plan. The lowest cost premium plan is $544.15 per month for 2022, resulting in a maximum potential payment of $272.08; minus the employer's cost to provide the payment, for a net payment of $250 per month. The employees with 2022 group health coverage through their partners would be eligible to receive from the City a proposed monthly cash payment of $250 in lieu of the health insurance benefit offered to them by the City. In this scenario, the City would save $294.15 per member per month in property tax levy cost. The transition is not without risk to the plan: • Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota reserves the right to re -underwrite the plan if eligible active contracts change by more than 10% from initial proposal (equivalent to 8 additional individuals that would move off the plan) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving for 2022 a $250 per month cash in lieu of payment to employees who opt out of City Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota group health insurance coverage provided they are covered on their partner's group health insurance plan. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021-XXX APPROVING 2022 EMPLOYEE GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE OPT OUT OPTION WHEREAS, City's Labor Management Insurance Work Group evaluated an opt -out concept and found the City may experience annual net savings on premiums paid for employee group health insurance by offering a $250 per month cash in lieu of payment to employees who opt out of group health insurance provided by the City because they are enrolled in 2022 group health insurance coverage through their partner, and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges its support of potential annual net savings in premiums paid for employee health insurance if employees can obtain coverage through their partner's group health insurance plan; and WHEREAS, City Staff and the Insurance Work Group will evaluate the results of actual net health insurance premium savings to the City resulting from a program offering cash in lieu of opt out of City health insurance during the 2022 insurance open enrollment period and provide those results to the City Council for inclusion in the final 2022 budget. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Stillwater hereby approves a 2022 $250 per month cash in lieu of payment to employees who opt out of City Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota group health insurance coverage due to coverage on their partner's plan. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of September, 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk STAFF REQUEST ITEM Department: Fire Date: September 30, 2021 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST (Briefly outline what the request is) Approve attached proposal for manufacturing and equipping fireboat designed for Stillwater Fire. This request replaces the current 25 year old fireboat currently in use. The new piece of equipment is specifically designed and constructed to meet the unique needs of Stillwater Fire and our response district. FINANCIAL IMPACT (Briefly outline the costs, if any, that are associated with this request and the proposed source of the funds needed to fund the request) Funding is available and has been allocated in the Fire Department's CIP to purchase this resource. All prices are GSA contract pricing or government bid equivalent. Proposal Price: *Pre -Pay Option — Subtract Electronics/Equipment: Estimated Shipping: $ 221,037.00 $ - 7,736.29 Boat Total: $ 213,300.71 $ 35,985.25 $ 7,500.00 Total: $256,785.96 Recommend approval with pre -pay option to save over $7K dollars. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ATTACHED Yes X No ALL COUNCIL REQUEST ITEMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO BE PLACED IN THE COUNCIL MATERIAL PACKET. Submitted by: Stuart W. Glaser, Fire Chief Date: September 30, 2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS UPDATED QUOTE - V.3-1 September 28, 2021 Stillwater, Minnesota Fire Department Attn Deputy Chief Tom BALLIS STANLEY WELDED ALUMINUM CONNOR INDUSTRIESY 2022 - 28' x 9'10" BULLNOSE CUSTOM FIRE RESCUE LANDING CRAFT PACKAGE STANDARD AND UPGRADED BOAT FEATURES • Hull, 5083 marine grade aluminum construction • %" bottom, 3/16" sides, 5 bar non-skid self -bailing deck • Reinforced hull framing and bow grounding protection package • Vee-bottom hull with outside reverse chines and directional strakes • Square bow with hydraulic drop -down bow gate • Hydraulic controls at bow gate and helm • Flush -mounted LED Bow Lights for docking • Port/Starboard weather -tight side storage lockers at bow with XL drain holes • Two (2) starboard and port side dock access fold -in doors • Walk-through Transom Door, port side • Reinforced bow push knees with D-rubber fendering • 3" D-rubber fendering installed at gunnels from bow to stern • Raptor Guard complete floor/deck of boat, fore and aft, wheelhouse included • Foredeck Tie -Down Lugs, port and starboard • Foredeck Stowage with flush deck hatch • One (1) 120-U.S. gallons below -deck fuel tank • Rub rails with integral safety/grab rails on both sides • Teleflex hydraulic steering • Eight (8) 12" mooring cleats. Four per side • Exterior Stern bench seat for divers, with weather -tight stowage underneath, XL drains • Tow post/bollard, aft • Heavy-duty dual bar motor guard with integral Stokes basket rack • Six (6) LED Diffused Roof Lights on wheelhouse, 2 port, 2 starboard, 2 aft Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS CONNOR • Six (6) Red LED Under -Gunnels Lights; 4 forward of the wheelhouse P/S, 2 aft of the wheelhouse P/S • Two (2) ACR RCL-75 roof mounted search lights or equivalent • Additional conduit installed for buyer's future electronics (TBD) • Dual Battery Selector/Battery Disconnect, Battery trickle charger (pre -wired batt charger, Quad- 5 or similar, connects to extension cord) WHEELHOUSE • Fully -enclosed Aluminum Wheelhouse • Lockable Port and Starboard Side Sliding Doors • Helm Bolster Seat with stowage underneath • Inside Stern Bench Seat with locker stowage • Laminated Safety -Glass Windows mounted in rubber gasket • Windshield Wiper • Windshield Demisting Fan • VHF Radio and rooftop antenna • Navigation lights, eight (8) gang breaker panel, horn, bilge pump and highwater alarm • 2 Power Point (Cigarette lighter plug) and USB combo receptacle • FLIR Thermal Camera with Joystick —TO BE PROVIDED BY BUYER — installation only • Fold -down Radar Arch • Four (4) red/white LED interior ceiling/dome lights in wheelhouse • Four (4) blue/red LED cabin sole/deck lights in wheelhouse • One (1) dash -mounted LED snake light • Two (2) XL cup holders at helm • Misc. interior grab rails for crew safety • SOLAS Reflective on exterior wheelhouse brow, all 4 sides: fore/aft/starboard/port, WHITE PROPULSION • Twin YAMAHA O/Bs, 225 HP each, standard 4-stroke engines • Electronic Shift and Throttle • Dash set up for twin motor controls box and gauges - YAMAHA standard binnacle controls • YAMAHA Wire Harness, Gauge Kit • Water Fuel Separator, S/S Prop, Tie Bar and PDI • Lenco Trim Tabs or equivalent Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS TRI-AXLE TRAILER INCLUDED 1'ONNOR INDUSTRIES • Aluminum Tri-axle bunk trailer, tongue jack, coupler, rubber -mounted lighting, safety chains with snap hooks. EMERGENCY LIGHTING and SIREN • Full -Size (42"- 48") Whelen Emergency LED Light Bar, red and blue • Full -Size (42"- 48") white LED Light Bar, mounted above red and blue bar • Whelen Water Proof Siren • Whelen Water Proof Control Head Bail Mount • Whelen 100-Watt Speaker FIRE PUMP INCLUDED • Fire pump with deck gun, and hose line capabilities, with deck controls in wheelhouse • Hale HPX4SO-B35 Max Attack Pump • Hale Primer12 ESP Valve • Hard -plumbed to stanchion in front of pump and below deck water pick-up • Standard Canvas cover for pump included* (see Note below) 2022 UPGRADED BOAT PACKAGE AS ABOVE $ 221,037.00 USD * DISCOUNT for full payment in advance, per Rod Soucie, General Manager, 9/20/2021: • 3.5% (total price LESS $7,736.29 USD) = $ 213,300.71 • Tax Exempt for export • Delivery is not included. Stillwater FD to pick up in Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada. FYI, estimated freight cost, as of September 2021, independent licensed/bonded boat haulers, subject to change: add $6,000.00 to $7,500.00 USD +/-, Parry Sound to Stillwater. (Firm delivery quote unavailable for late 2022 due to multiple variables, including fuel costs, insurance, and labor rates.) Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS SELECTED OPTIONAL FEATURES CONNOR INDUSTRIESY • Hydraulic Bow Gate INCLUDED • Second ACR RCL-75 or equivalent roof -mounted search light INCLUDED • Hale HPX450-B35 Max Attack Pump INCLUDED • Bow Push Knees with D-Rubber INCLUDED • D-Rubber fendering at gunnels, bow to stern INCLUDED • Windshield Demisting Fan INCLUDED • Raptor Guard floor deck of boat, fore and aft, and wheelhouse INCLUDED • SOLAS Reflective on Wheelhouse Brow, all 4 sides, WHITE, INCLUDED *NOTE: OPTIONAL, price to be determined: • Buyer may add aluminum cabinet for Hale pump with hose tray, extra: price and design TBD • Pump air intake and exhaust must not be impeded • All sides should be removable • Additional cost expected to be approximately $1,100.00 USD +/- depending on complexity • Buyer to authorize or decline by mid -way point of the boat build. Contact Rod Soucie or Brian Higgins. Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS PAYMENT TERMS CONNOR INDUSTRIES • 20% Deposit, upon signed contract • 30% on start of fabrication • 30% on receiving and proof of delivery of propulsion • 20% on Completion and factory acceptance prior to shipping Note: New boat builds are assigned in the order they are received by General Manager Rod Soucie, rod@connorindustries.com upon signature and receipt of deposit. Phone 705-746-5875, Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada. Notes to PURCHASER, Stillwater Fire Department Manufacturer's Factory Testing: PDI, test -fire engines and calibrate gauges. Marine trial (basic sea trial) to be concluded prior to release by Stanley Aluminum Boats, in Parry Sound, Ontario, Canada. Integrated Logistics support: complete Owners Manuals to be provided for all supplied equipment. Final electronics choices can be made midway through boat build: buyer contact GM Rod Soucie or Brian Higgins, Commercial Boats: 705-746-5875. Additional equipment, if any, to be priced at time of installation. Buyer to authorize as required. Manufacturer's Warranty: aluminum hull warrantied for 10 (ten) years to cover hull construction defects and/or hull material defects, if any. Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 STANLEY ALUMINUM BOATS CONNOR INDUSTRIES Completion: the vessel will be completed and ready for shipping within 12 (twelve) months of signed contract and deposit; factory testing and sea trial completed. Contacts: Rod Soucie, General Manager, rod@connorindustries.com Brian Higgins, Commercial Boats Division, brian@connorindustries.com Phone for both: 705-746-5875, office "Thank you for your business!" httbs://StanleyBoats.ca Stanley Aluminum Boats — Factory Price New Boat Quotation for Stillwater, Minnesota FD — 9.28.2021 Loose Equipment Quantity Price 2021 First Watch RS-1000 Ice Rescue Suit 1 $645.00 First Watch Auto PFD Red/Grey 5 $690.00 Throw Bag 70ft 2 $85.00 Water Rescue Rope & Bag 200ft 1 $179.43 (these items from Atlas Outfitters) SMC Rope Tracker 2 $146.00 Shipping 1 $106.00 MARSARS Reach Pole System 1 $950.00 Shipping 1 $90.00 Streamlight Vulcan HiViz & charger 2 $369.06 (Tom - MES) Safety Ring Buoy (CMC) 1 $117.56 Floating Resuce Litter Basket kit Floating BaXStrap Spineboard (CMC) 1 $949.75 1 $422.00 Shipping $400.00 Total $5,149.80 Atlas Outfitters ATR All Terrain Rescue Equipment and Training 1421 Birch Cove Court Reedsville WI 54230 Phone 800-776-7199 Email: Sales@atlasoutfitters.com FED ID # 39-1841236 DUNS# 091373527 QUOTATION Date: September 23, 2021, 2021 For: Stillwater Fire Department 250 Maryknoll Drive N Stillwater, MN 55082 ATTN Chris Zeuli PHONE: 651-351-4972 EMAIL: czeuli@ci.stillwater.mn.us Qtv Item # Description www.atlasoutfitters.com **List Extended 1 RS1000 First Watch Ice Rescue suit 645 00 645.00 1 A3-200 200 ft water rescue rope in wide mouth bag includes stainless steel snaphook and float 179 43 179.43 2 A9 Throwbag with 70 ft water line 42.50 85 00 5 FWV240 First Watch auto inflatable 24 grams red/grey 138.00 690 00 2 SM148100 SMC Rope tracker 73.00 146 00 Shipping 106 00 1 JSA-300 Junkin standard splint mesh litter 318.00 318 00 1 JSA-303 Flotation kit for litter 456.00 456.00 Shipping for litter 175.75 175.75 2801.18 ** List represents discounted public safety pricing Chris Zeuli From: Sent: To: Subject Robert Davis <r.davis@marsars.com> Thursday, September 23, 2021 1:52 PM Chris Zeuli Water Rescue Gear, City of Stillwater, MN [CRUTICN *** This email originated from outside the organization. *** Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 9/23/202 I MARSARS Water Rescue Systems Chris Zeuli Assistant Chicf City of Stillwater 250 Maryknoll Drive North Stillwater, MN 55082 Prices as follows: 1 kt MARSARS Reach Polc System 3 @ $950.00 + shipping Sincerely, Dania Chief Petty Officer Robert Davis U.S. Navy Combat Veteran, U.S. Coast Guard (Ret) Founder, MARSARS Water Rescue Systems, Inc. 8 Algonkin Rd., Shelton, CT. 06484 Ph: 203-924-7315 Fax: 203-924-4198 Toll free: 1-866-426-2423 Email: tnli' ,, ttt;tnar,_�t�m, r.davisgmarsars.com www.marsars.com t MES MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 124 East First Street Deer Creek, IL 61733 Quote Date 09/22/2021 Quote # QT1509372 Expires 10/07/2021 Sales Rep Sarff, Anthony PO # Shipping Method FedEx Ground Bill To Ship To STILLWATER FIRE DEPT 216 4TH ST N STILLWATER MN 55082-4807 Tom Ballis STILLWATER FIRE DEPT 250 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 44301 Vulcan 180 Standard System - IEC Type A 2 184.53 369.06 (120V/100V) AC/12V DC, includes heavy duty shoulder strap - Yellow 726400 Backboard Millennia Ferno 1 422.00 422.00 710249 Resuce Buoy USCG App 24 inch W/Refl Tap 1 117.56 117.56 Subtotal 908.62 Shipping Cost (FedEx Ground) 0.00 Total $908.62 This Quotation is subject to any applicable sales tax and shipping & handling charges that may apply Tax and shipping charges are considered estimated and will be recalculated at the time of shipment to ensure they take Into account the most current local tax information. All returns must be processed within 30 days of receipt and require a return authorization number and are subject to a restocking fee. Custom orders are not returnable. Effective tax rate will be applicable at the time of invoice. II III III II I IIIII IIII II I III II III QT1509372 Date: 9/15/2021 Print Date: 9/22/2021 Page: Page 1 of 1 Bi liTo: Stillwater Fire Department 250 Maryknoll Drive North Stillwater MN 55082 651-351-4951? Johnso icks 333 LAKE AVE., STEC SANTA CRUZ,CA., 95062 PH.831-475-3383 www.JohnsonHicksMarine.com Estimate # 22996 Reference: Ship To / Via: PO # Clerk: Vince Terms: NET 30 DAYS Item Number 010-02093-03 010-02092-01 010-C1205-00 010-01864-00 010-12970-00 010-13073-00 010-01706-00 010-02316-10 010-00351-00 500-0398-10 E70518 LNP-0500G-24-T A80159 010-10580-10 010-10550-00 010-11442-00 010-11078-01 010-11076-00 Description Quantity List Price Pricing is in accordance with GSA contract numberGS-07F-0492Y. Contracting documents available upon request. GPSMAP 8616xsv, w/BlueCart G3 coastal and LakeVu g3 inland rnaps GPSMAP 8612, w/BlueCart G3 coastal and LakeVu g3 inland maps U.S. LakeVii g3 Ultra West - LVUS107F Panoptix LiveScope, includes GLS10 sonar black box, Panoptix LV532 transducer, transom mount, trolling motor barrel mount, trolling motor shaft mount Panoptix LiveScope Perspective Mode Mount Total 1 5,999.99 4,790.39 4,790.39 1 3,499.99 2,794.39 2,794.39 1 199.99 159.99 159.99 1 1,499.99 1,197.59 1,197.59 1 99.99 89.76 89.76 Used with trolling motor or gunnel mount (Gunnel mount not included) GT56UHD-TMUHD Clearvu and SideVu:, Traditional Chirp High Wide 12 pin GMR Fantom 18 40W 18-in dome radar GPS 24xd NMEA 2000® with heading ( no roll and pitch output) GMS 10 Network Port Expander Joystick Control Unit (JCU2) for MaritimeCameras - requires PoE M364C Dual Payload 640 CTV Camera, 24-deg HFoV (does not include]CU) 5-Port Industrial PoE+ Unmanaged Gigabit Ethernet Switch w/4*10/100/1000Tx (30W/Port) + 1*10/100/1000Tx, 12-36VDC, EOT:-40-75C RayNet (F) to RJ45 (M) cable - 10m Coupler, Marine Network PoE isolation 6ft Marine network cable, RJ45 NMEA 2000 Starter Kit NMEA 2000 Tee Connector, 4 ports NMEA 2000 backbone/drop cable (2m) 1 478.94 380.00 380.00 1 1,999.99 1,596.79 1,596.79 1 299.99 239.99 239.99 1 249.99 183.32 183.32 i 1,499.00 1,332.50 1,332.50 1 21,995.00 17,079.17 17,079.17 1 461.00 437,95 437.95 1 114.99 88.66 88.66 1 49.99 37.42 37.42 4 29.99 20.95 83.80 1 99.00 79.20 79.20 1 49.99 39.99 39.99 1 30.67 24.54 24.54 Total Parts Total Labor ShippingFees Total $30,635.45 $0.00 $200.00 $30,835.45 THANKYOUFORYOURCONSIDERATION Estimates are valid for 30 days only. Governmentestimates valid for entire order only. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE 2021 HARVEST FEST SPECIAL EVENT CONTRACT WHEREAS, the 2021 Harvest Fest Special Event and Contract was approved on September 7th, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Organizer wishes to use the following parking lots/areas: 4, 5, 9, 11 and Mulberry Circle. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Stillwater City Council hereby approves amending item number 8 of the contract to read as follows: 8. Use of Parking Lots. The organizer is aware and will inform all vendors and event participants that staking into the asphalt, etc. Is not allowed (any damage repair will be paid for by the organizer). The Event is given use of parking Lots 4, 5, 9 and 4-0 11 and Mulberry Circle on Fri -Sun. The Organizer agrees to pay the City for the use of the parking lot according to the parking space fees designated by the City Council. The City prefers the Association to stage the event in Lowell Park rather than in public parking lots. If Lowell Park is not flooded and is not recovering from flood waters, then it should be the primary event venue. Use of public parking lots will be approved only as an alternate or if sufficient space does not exist in the Park to accommodate all event activities. If in the opinion of the City, public parking lots will be needed, then the preferred lots for use would be Lots 5, 9, 10 and 11. These lots will be available to the Association exclusively from Friday AM until Monday AM of the Event weekend. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of September, 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk iillwaies HE EiKTH PLA C E OF M IONES[I T A Memo To: Mayor and City Council From: Jason Grode, Parks Superintendent Meeting Date: October 5, 2021 Re: Skate Park Ramp Donation BACKGROUND: The City of Stillwater has been approached with a donation of a skateboard ramp that could be used at the City's Skate Park. This is being proposed to be donated to the City of Stillwater by Mr. John Tasch. The skateboard ramp is skatepark grade quality and can be installed outdoors. If accepted, City Staff recommends installing the skateboard ramp on the North side of the Skate Park. This was also approved for recommendation to the City Council by the Parks and Recreation Commission at their September 27th meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: The next step is for the City Council to approve acceptance of the donation. Attachment: Skate Park Aerial, Picture of Ramp and Email Moe Geode Franc John Tasch Sark Friday, August 27, 2021 12:15 PM Toe Jason Grode Suhjrete Stilhvater skatrpark ramp donation [CAUTION] " ' This email ortgi:sal.e1 !rpm uu: iJr the organization. '•i Do not click links or open attachments unJesa you rrerogniry the iondcr and know the GOLtent is safe. JTJohn Tasoh here, We spoke this morning. Thanks for the consideration. The eDrr any that built the ramp is here: https:lwww.railwithrammts r,oml The dimensions will allow it to in on either the north or south side of the current public skateperk by the dome/Cub Foods. The actual ramp is the aft tall, I ft wider around 20-22ft long version of this: htt#sJlwww-rallwit]trammels-oomlortidurt- karege-nnl ramp -kits I would love to donate it to the city so anyone could use It at the public park. Please let me know what else I can help with this decision. Slncereiy, JT Tasch JT Tasch sth Grade Teacher Rutherford 651.3$1-6400of cc line] 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Reabar Abdullah, Assistant City Engineer DATE: October 1, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021 Street Improvement Project Assessment Hearing and Adoption of Assessment Roll Projects 2021-02 DISCUSSION: Completion of the 2021 Street Project is near with some work scheduled as follows: • Paving Mid Oaks Street base course, the week of October 4, 2021. • Paving Maryknoll Drive base course, the week of October 11, 2021. • Pour remaining concrete sidewalk along Maryknoll Drive, the week of October 11, 2021. • Topsoil restoration, the week of October 1, 2021. • Pave the wear course on Lecuyer Drive area and Mid Oaks Ave, the week of October 11, 2021. • Patch Driveways on Maryknoll drive, the week of October 11, 2021. • Seeding, the week of October 18, 2021. The last step in the City's improvement process is to adopt the assessments for the project. The feasibility estimate for the project was $2,137,189 and the final project cost is estimated to be $2,095,862.31. There were slight variations in the final assessment amount. The appraisals were higher than the estimated assessments at the beginning of the project. The actual calculated cost of the project is assessed to the property owners because it was less than the appraised benefit value to the properties. The table below shows assessments rates for the project: Property Type Preliminary Assessment Rate Final Assessment Rate Reconstruct Maryknoll Drive $8,967/ unit $8,743/unit Reconstruct Mid Oaks Ave. $9,320/unit $8,355/unit M&O without Sidewalk $2,231/ unit $2,340.5/unit M&O with Sidewalk $3,012/unit $2,854/unit Partial Reconstruct Lecuyer Drive area $5,971/unit $5,573/unit Mill & Overlay City property $23.17/ft $24.14/ft *City properties are assessed per linear foot according to city policy. A few items of note regarding assessments: • Residential corner lots are assessed 0.5 units per side improved and may have received two different assessment rates, i.e. the comer lot of Interlachen Drive and Maryknoll Drive. • There are few City properties in the Mill and Overlay area that are calculated at linear foot and the total is deducted from the construction cost. Funding of the project is split as follows: Assessments = $1,514,385 City Funds = $581,520 To Date there have been no objections submitted to the City. The assessment period would be 10 years at an interest rate of 2.95. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council hold the assessment hearing, and adopt the attached assessment roll for the 2021 Street Improvement Project. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should conduct the public hearing and pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 2021-, RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR 2021 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PROJECT 2021-02). City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR 2021 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROJECT 2021-02, L.I. 432 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the council has met and heard all objections to the proposed assessment for the 2021 Street Improvement Project for the following area: Properties abutting Bayberry Ave. (Maryknoll Dr. N to Hawthorn Ln.), Interlachen Dr. (Bayberry Ave to 72nd St. N),Pineridge Ln., Northland Ave. (Interlachen Dr. to Hawthorne Ln.), Edgewood Ave., Edgewood Ct., Fairlawn Dr., Eagle Ridge Trail (Creekside Crossing to Neal Ave.), Creekside Crossing, Creekside Cir., Creekside Ct., Autumn Way, Nightingale Blvd., Tamarack Ct., Interlachen Ct., Walnut Creek Dr., Cottonwood Ct., Eagle Ridge Cir., Eagle Ridge Ct., Eagle Ridge Crescent, Lecuyer Dr., Lecuyer Cir., Lecuyer Ct., Thorene Pl., Maryknoll Drive from Oakridge Rd to Bayberry Ave., Mid Oaks Ave. N NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessments, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in equal installments over a period of ten (10) years with the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2022, and shall bear interest at the rate of 2.95% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolutions. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2021. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. Property owners may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment balance on such property, without any additional interest to the City of Stillwater. NO INTEREST WILL BE CHARGED IF THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT IS PAID BY NOVEMBER 15, 2021. If the assessment is not paid by November 15, 2021, accrued interest from the date of the adoption of the assessment roll through December 31, 2021 will be added with the first installment due in 2022. If payment is not received by November 15, 2021, the assessments will be collected over a period of ten (10) years with interest added at 2.95% per year on the unpaid balance. The yearly installments will be collected with the property taxes that are paid to Washington County. You may at any time thereafter, prior to November 15th of any year, pay the remaining principal balance (in whole or part) to the City of Stillwater. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the council this 5th day of October 2021. ATTEST: Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Beth Wolf, City Clerk ASSESSMENT RATES: Partial Con. = $5573 Full Con. = $8743 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% RECONSTRUCTION GEO STREET CITY Partial Con. Unit Full Con. Unit Partial Con. Rate Full Con. Rate TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020320003 2460 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2460 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320004 2504 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2504 BAYBERRY AVE 2003020330080 1003 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1003 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330079 1008 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1008 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020340035 1013 EAGLE RIDGE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1013 EAGLE RIDGE CIR 2003020330087 1015 EAGLE RIDGE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1015 EAGLE RIDGE CIR 2003020330078 1016 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1016 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330077 1024 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1024 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330081 1025 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1025 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330082 1027 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1027 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330086 1028 EAGLE RIDGE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1028 EAGLE RIDGE CIR 2003020330085 1034 EAGLE RIDGE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1034 EAGLE RIDGE CIR 2003020330083 1039 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1039 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020340007 1051 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1051 EAGLE RIDGE TRL 2003020330006 1101 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1101 EAGLE RIDGE TRL 2003020330076 1102 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1102 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330084 1103 EAGLE RIDGE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1103 EAGLE RIDGE CT 2003020330074 1105 EAGLE RIDGE CRES STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1105 EAGLE RIDGE CRES 2003020330073 1107 EAGLE RIDGE CRES STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1107 EAGLE RIDGE CRES 2003020330072 1108 EAGLE RIDGE CRESCENT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1108 EAGLE RIDGE CRES 2003020330075 1110 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082-9141 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1110 EAGLE RIDGE TRL 2003020330071 1223 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1223 EAGLE RIDGE CRES 2903020320039 2501 HAWTHORNE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2501 HAWTHORNE LN 2903020320019 2502 HAWTHORNE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2502 HAWTHORNE LN 2903020320074 2500 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2500 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330026 2501 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 2501 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020210036 900 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 900 LECUYER DR 2903020210037 911 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 911 LECUYER DR 2903020210035 920 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 920 LECUYER DR 2903020210038 921 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 921 LECUYER DR 2903020210034 940 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 940 LECUYER DR 2003020340015 1000 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1000 LECUYER DR 2003020340016 1001 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1001 LECUYER DR 2003020340014 1010 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1010 LECUYER DR 2003020340017 1011 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1011 LECUYER DR 2003020340013 1020 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1020 LECUYER DR 2003020340018 1021 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1021 LECUYER DR 1 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATES: Partial Con. = $5573 Full Con. = $8743 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% RECONSTRUCTION GEO STREET CITY Partial Con. Unit Full Con. Unit Partial Con. Rate Full Con. Rate TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2003020340012 1030 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1030 LECUYER DR 2003020340019 1031 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1031 LECUYER DR 2003020340011 1040 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1040 LECUYER DR 2003020340020 1041 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1041 LECUYER DR 2003020340010 1100 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1100 LECUYER DR 2003020340021 1101 LECUYER CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1101 LECUYER DR 2003020340009 1110 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1110 LECUYER DR 2003020340008 1120 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1120 LECUYER DR 2003020340022 1121 LECUYER CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1121 LECUYER CT 2003020340023 1131 LECUYER CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1131 LECUYER CT 2003020340024 1151 LECUYER CT STILLWATER MN 55082-9131 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1151 LECUYER CT 2003020340033 1160 LECUYER DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1160 LECUYER DR 2003020340025 1171 LECUYER CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1171 LECUYER CT 2003020340032 1180 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1180 LECUYER CIR 2003020340026 1191 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1191 LECUYER CIR 2003020340031 1200 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1200 LECUYER CIR 2003020340027 1201 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1201 LECUYER CIR 2003020340028 1221 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1221 LECUYER CIR 2003020340030 1240 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1240 LECUYER CIR 2003020340029 1241 LECUYER CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1241 LECUYER CIR 2903020320026 30 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 30 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320027 31 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 31 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320025 46 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 46 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320028 47 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 47 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320024 62 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 62 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320029 PO BOX 183 STILLWATER MN 55082-0183 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 63 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320023 78 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 78 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320030 79 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 79 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320031 93 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 93 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320022 94 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 94 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320032 109 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 109 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320021 112 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 112 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320020 126 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 126 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320033 127 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 127 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320034 143 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 143 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320035 159 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 159 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320036 173 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 173 MARYKNOLL DR 2 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATES: Partial Con. = $5573 Full Con. = $8743 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% RECONSTRUCTION GEO STREET CITY Partial Con. Unit Full Con. Unit Partial Con. Rate Full Con. Rate TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020320037 189 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 189 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320038 197 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 197 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330025 201 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 201 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330024 203 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 203 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330028 204 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 204 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330023 205 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 205 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330029 206 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 206 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330022 207 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 207 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330030 208 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 208 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330021 209 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 209 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330031 210 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 210 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330020 211 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 211 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330032 212 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 212 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330033 214 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 214 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330019 301 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 301 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330034 302 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 302 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330018 303 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 303 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330035 304 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 304 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330017 305 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 305 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330036 306 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 306 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330016 307 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 307 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330037 402 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 402 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330042 404 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,743.00 $4,371.50 404 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330015 405 MARYKNOLL AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,743.00 $8,743.00 405 MARYKNOLL DR 3003020430008 7010 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7010 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430007 7030 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7030 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430009 7055 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7055 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430006 7070 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7070 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020440003 7079 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7079 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430005 7100 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7100 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020440004 7101 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7101 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430004 7130 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7130 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430003 7160 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7160 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020440005 7171 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 7171 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020440006 7181 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,355.00 $4,177.50 7181 MID OAKS AVE N 3003020430002 7190 MID OAKS AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $8,355.00 $4,177.50 7190 MID OAKS AVE N 2903020330014 2402 OAKRIDGE RD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 2402 OAKRIDGE RD 3 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATES: Partial Con. = $5573 Full Con. = $8743 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% RECONSTRUCTION GEO STREET CITY Partial Con. Unit Full Con. Unit Partial Con. Rate Full Con. Rate TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2003020330064 1111 THORENE PL STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1111 THORENE PL 2003020330056 1202 THORENE PLACE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $5,573.00 $2,786.50 1202 THORENE PL 2003020330063 1203 THORENE PL STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1203 THORENE PL 2003020330057 1214 THORENE PLACE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1214 THORENE PL 2003020330062 1215 THORENE PL STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1215 THORENE PL 2003020330058 1226 THORENE PLACE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1226 THORENE PL 2003020340036 1227 THORENE PL STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1227 THORENE PL 2003020330059 1238 THORENE PLACE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1238 THORENE PL 2003020330060 1239 THORENE PLACE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $5,573.00 $5,573.00 1239 THORENE PL Highlighted properties are on both Reconstructioin and 56 52 $762,456.00 Mill & Overlay 4 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 3203020210108 801 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 801 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210109 805 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 805 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210110 809 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 809 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210111 813 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 813 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210112 817 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 817 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210113 821 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 821 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210114 825 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 825 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210115 829 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 829 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210116 833 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 833 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210117 837 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 837 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210118 841 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 841 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210119 845 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 845 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210120 849 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 849 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210121 853 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 853 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210122 857 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 857 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210123 861 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 861 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210124 865 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 865 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210125 13533 W PAVILLION DR SUN CITY WEST AZ 85375-5819 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 869 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210126 873 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 873 AUTUMN WAY 3203020210127 877 AUTUMN WAY RD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 877 AUTUMN WAY 2903020310027 2201 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2201 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020310026 2241 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2241 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020310025 2301 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2301 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320004 2504 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2504 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320005 2524 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2524 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320006 2544 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2544 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320007 2564 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2564 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320010 2565 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2565 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320008 2570 BAYBERRY AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2570 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320009 2576 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2576 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320011 2577 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2577 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320012 2581 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2581 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320075 2582 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2582 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320013 2587 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2587 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320076 2588 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2588 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320014 2591 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2591 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320077 2592 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2592 BAYBERRY AVE 1 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020320015 2593 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2593 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320078 2596 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2596 BAYBERRY AVE 2903020320016 2597 BAYBERRY AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2597 BAYBERRY AVE 3003020110003 12880 BOUTWELL RD N STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 12880 BOUTWELL RD N 3003020110004 12920 BOUTWELL RD N STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 12920 BOUTWELL RD N 2903020320063 166 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 166 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320062 176 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 176 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320064 177 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 177 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320065 183 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 183 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320061 1245 25TH ST HUDSON WI 54016 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 186 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320066 193 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 193 COTTONWOOD CT 2903020320060 196 COTTONWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 196 COTTONWOOD CT 1903020440040 1104 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1104 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440039 1110 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1110 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440038 1116 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1116 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440037 332 WHITTINGTON WAY LIBERTY HILL TX 78642 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1122 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440036 1128 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1128 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440061 1131 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1131 CREEKSIDE CROS 1903020440035 1134 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1134 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440034 1140 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1140 CREEKSIDE CIR 1903020440060 1141 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1141 CREEKSIDE CROS 1903020440027 1200 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1200 CREEKSIDE XING 1903020440026 1206 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1206 CREEKSIDE XING 1903020440025 1212 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1212 CREEKSIDE XING 1903020440044 1225 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1225 CREEKSIDE XING 1903020440033 2401 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2401 CREEKSIDE CT 1903020440032 2407 CREEKSIDE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2407 CREEKSIDE CT 1903020440028 2412 CREEKSIDE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2412 CREEKSIDE CT 1903020440031 2413 CREEKSIDE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2413 CREEKSIDE CT 1903020440029 2418 CREEKSIDE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2418 CREEKSIDE CT 1903020440030 2419 CREEKSIDE CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2419 CREEKSIDE CT 3003020110023 1075 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1075 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 3003020110022 1095 CREEKSIDE CROSS STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1095 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440054 1103 CREEKSIDE CROSSINC STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1103 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440057 1105 CREEKSIDE CROSSINC STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1105 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440058 1107 CREEKSIDE CROSSINC STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1107 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440052 7787 GUSTY TRL DOUGLASVILLE GA 30135 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1109 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 2 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 1903020440053 1111 CREEKSIDE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1111 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440050 1201 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1201 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440047 1205 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1205 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440024 1218 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1218 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440023 1224 CREEKSIDE XING STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1224 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440022 1230 CREEKSIDE CROSSINC STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1230 CREEKSIDE CROSSING 1903020440041 2400 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2400 EAGLE RIDGE TRL 1903020440048 2401 EAGLE RIDGE TRL STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2401 EAGLE RIDGE TRL 2903020330008 200 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 200 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330009 211 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 211 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330007 220 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 220 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330061 301 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 301 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330076 302 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 302 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330060 307 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 307 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330075 308 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 308 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330059 313 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 313 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330074 314 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 314 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330058 319 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 319 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330057 325 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 325 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330056 401 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 401 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330067 402 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 402 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330055 1203 RIVERCREST RD N LAKELAND MN 55043 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 407 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330066 408 EDGEWOOD AVE S STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 408 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330054 413 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 413 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330065 414 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 414 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330053 419 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 419 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330064 420 EDGEWOOD AVE S STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 420 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330052 610 BROADWAY ST S STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 425 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330051 501 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 501 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330077 502 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 502 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330050 507 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 507 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330079 508 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 508 EDGEWOOD AVE 3203020220106 513 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 513 EDGEWOOD AVE 3203020220109 514 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 514 EDGEWOOD AVE 3203020220105 320 OHIO ST. W #650 CHICAGO IL 60654 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 519 EDGEWOOD AVE 3203020220108 520 EDGEWOOD AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 520 EDGEWOOD AVE 2903020330073 2602 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2602 EDGEWOOD CT 3 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020330072 2608 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2608 EDGEWOOD CT 2903020330071 2614 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2614 EDGEWOOD CT 2903020330068 2617 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2617 EDGEWOOD CT 2903020330070 2620 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2620 EDGEWOOD CT 2903020330069 2623 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2623 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440056 1066 DELANO CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2626 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440050 2629 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2629 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440055 2632 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2632 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440051 2635 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2635 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440054 2638 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2638 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440052 2641 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2641 EDGEWOOD CT 3003020440053 2644 EDGEWOOD CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2644 EDGEWOOD CT 2903020330063 2612 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2612 FAIRLAWN DR 2903020330078 2615 FAIR LAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2615 FAIRLAWN DR 2903020330062 2618 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2618 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440057 2621 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2621 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440049 2624 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2624 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440058 2627 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2627 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440048 2630 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2630 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440059 2633 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2633 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440047 2636 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082-4851 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2636 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440060 2639 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2639 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440046 2642 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2642 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440061 2645 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2645 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440045 1422 SETTLERS WAY HOULTON WI 54082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2648 FAIRLAWN DR 3103020110092 2651 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2651 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440044 2654 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2654 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440063 2660 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2660 FAIRLAWN DR 3003020440043 2666 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2666 FAIRLAWN DR 3103020110091 2672 FAIRLAWN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2672 FAIRLAWN DR 2903020320017 2566 HAWTHORNE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2566 HAWTHORNE LN 2903020320079 2602 HAWTHORNE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2602 HAWTHORNE LN 3103020130004 2876 ICEROSE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2876 ICEROSE LN 3103020130013 2877 ICEROSE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2877 ICEROSE LN 2903020310028 221 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 221 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310065 230 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 230 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310047 231 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 231 INTERLACHEN WAY 4 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020310069 240 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 240 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310048 151 3RD ST PO BOX 151 MARINE ON ST CROIX MN 5504' 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 241 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310066 250 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 250 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310049 251 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 251 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310067 260 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 260 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310050 261 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 261 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310051 271 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 271 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310052 281 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 281 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020310053 291 INTERLACHEN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 291 INTERLACHEN WAY 2903020340061 2175 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2175 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310068 2180 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2180 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340060 2185 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2185 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310070 2190 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082-5276 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2190 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340059 2195 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2195 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310071 2200 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2200 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340081 2205 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2205 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310072 2220 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2220 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310073 2310 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2310 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340111 2311 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2311 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310074 2320 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2320 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340110 2321 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2321 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310075 120 RIVERSIDE PLZ S CHICAGO IL 60606 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2330 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340109 2331 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2331 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020310076 2340 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2340 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020340108 2341 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 2341 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320074 2500 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2500 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330026 2501 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2501 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330013 2503 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2503 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320073 2510 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2510 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330012 2511 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2511 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330011 2519 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2519 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320072 2520 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2520 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330010 2527 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2527 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320071 2540 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2540 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320070 2560 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2560 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320069 2580 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2580 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320068 2600 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2600 INTERLACHEN DR 5 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020330006 2603 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2603 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320067 2610 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2610 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330005 2611 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2611 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330004 2619 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2619 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020330003 2627 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2627 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440042 2631 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2631 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440041 2635 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2635 INTERLACHEN DR 2903020320059 2636 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2636 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440040 2643 INTERLACHEN CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2643 INTERLACHEN CT 3003020410023 2000 INDUSTRIAL BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2646 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440039 2651 INTERLACHEN CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2651 INTERLACHEN CT 3003020410022 2656 INTERLACHEN RD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2656 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440038 2659 INTERLACHEN CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2659 INTERLACHEN DR 3003020440037 2667 INTERLACHEN CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2667 INTERLACHEN CT 3003020440036 2675 INTERLACHEN CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2675 INTERLACHEN CT 3003020440035 2683 INTERLACHEN DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2683 INTERLACHEN DR 3103020130048 2900 MARINE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2900 MARINE CIR 3103020130024 2901 MARINE CIR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2901 MARINE CIR 2903020320026 30 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 30 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020320038 197 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,854.00 $1,427.00 197 MARYKNOLL DR 2903020330025 201 MARYKNOLL DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,854.00 $1,427.00 201 MARYKNOLL DR 3003020110038 7990 NEAL AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 0 $2,340.50 $0.00 7990 NEAL AVE N 1903020440043 8220 NEAL AVE N STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 8220 NEAL AVE N 3103020110005 602 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 602 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110058 610 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 610 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110062 615 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 615 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110059 14844 129 LN SE YELM WA 98597 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 618 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110063 623 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 623 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110060 626 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 626 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110064 633 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 633 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110061 634 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 634 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020110065 639 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 639 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120002 642 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 642 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120003 650 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 650 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120004 658 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 658 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120005 700 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 700 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120008 701 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 701 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 6 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 3103020120006 708 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 708 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120009 709 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 709 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120007 716 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 716 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120010 717 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 717 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120017 724 NIGHTENGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 724 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120011 725 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 725 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120018 732 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 732 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120012 733 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 733 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120019 740 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 740 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120020 748 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 748 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120021 756 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 756 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120022 764 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 764 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120023 800 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 800 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120027 805 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 805 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120024 808 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 808 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020120028 815 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 815 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130008 816 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 816 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130009 824 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 824 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130003 825 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 825 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130010 832 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 832 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130015 1002 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1002 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130016 18 MOONLIGHT BAY STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1010 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140070 1011 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1011 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130017 1018 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1018 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140071 1019 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1019 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130018 1026 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1026 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140072 1027 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1027 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130019 1034 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1034 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140073 1035 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1035 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130020 940 S MAIN ST SCRANTON PA 18504 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1102 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140074 1103 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1103 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130021 1110 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1110 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140075 1111 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1111 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130022 1116 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1116 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140076 1117 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1117 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020130023 1124 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1124 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 3103020140077 1125 NIGHTINGALE BLVD STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1125 NIGHTINGALE BLVD 7 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 3003020410027 100 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,854.00 $1,427.00 100 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410004 105 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 105 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410028 110 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 110 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410005 2994 340TH AVE HINCKLEY MN 55037 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 115 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410029 120 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 120 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410006 125 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 125 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410030 130 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 130 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410007 135 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 135 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410031 140 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 140 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410008 145 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 145 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410032 150 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 150 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410009 155 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 155 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410033 160 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 160 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410010 165 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 165 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410034 170 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 170 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410011 175 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 175 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410035 180 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 180 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410012 185 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 185 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410036 190 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,854.00 $2,854.00 190 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410013 195 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 0.5 $2,854.00 $2,340.50 $2,597.25 195 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020410037 198 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 0.5 $2,854.00 $2,340.50 $2,597.25 198 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020440034 203 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 203 NORTHLAND AVE 3003020440008 204 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 204 NORTHLAND AVE 3103020110006 600 NORTHLAND AVE STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 600 NORTHLAND AVE 2903020310054 220 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 220 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310055 230 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 230 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310064 233 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 233 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310056 240 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 240 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310063 243 PINE RIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 243 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310057 250 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 250 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310062 253 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 253 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310058 260 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 260 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310061 263 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 263 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310059 270 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 270 PINERIDGE LN 2903020310060 273 PINERIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 273 PINERIDGE LN 2903020320055 122 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 122 TAMARACK CT 3003020410039 128 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 128 TAMARACK CT 8 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020320056 129 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 129 TAMARACK CT 3003020410019 132 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 132 TAMARACK CT 2903020320057 137 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 137 TAMARACK CT 3003020410018 144 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 144 TAMARACK CT 2903020320058 147 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 147 TAMARACK CT 3003020410017 156 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 156 TAMARACK CT 3003020410020 157 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 157 TAMARACK CT 3003020410021 167 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 167 TAMARACK CT 3003020410016 168 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 168 TAMARACK CT 3003020410015 182 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 182 TAMARACK CT 3003020410014 192 TAMARACK CT STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 192 TAMARACK CT 2003020330025 1110 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1110 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330017 1115 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1115 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330024 1130 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1130 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330016 1135 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1135 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330023 1150 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1150 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330015 1155 WALNUT CREEK DR N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1155 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330022 1170 WALNUT CRK STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1170 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330014 1175 WALNUT CREEK DR N STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1175 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330021 1190 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1190 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330013 1201 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 1201 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330012 2260 WALNUT CREEK DR W STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2260 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330011 2280 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2280 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330010 2300 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2300 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330020 2315 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2315 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330009 2320 WALNUT CREEK DR W STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2320 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330019 2335 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2335 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330008 2340 WALNUT CREEK DR W STILLWATER MN 55082 1 $2,340.50 $2,340.50 2340 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330018 2355 WALNUT CREEK DR W STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2355 WALNUT CREEK DR 2003020330007 2360 WALNUT CREEK DR STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2360 WALNUT CREEK DR 3103020120013 2866 WILDCREST LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2866 WILDCREST LN 3103020130014 2870 WOODRIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2870 WOODRIDGE LN 3103020140069 2871 WOODRIDGE LN STILLWATER MN 55082 0.5 $2,340.50 $1,170.25 2871 WOODRIDGE LN 3203020210106 801 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 3203020210107 801 AUTUMN WAY STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 2903020340112 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 2903020330040 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 9 9/30/2021 ASSESSMENT RATE: With Sidewalk = $2854 Without Sidewalk = $2340.50 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 2021-02 Street Improvement Project Project 2021-02, LI 432 ASSESSMENT PERIOD: 10 YEARS INTEREST RATE: 2.9% MILL & OVERLAY GEO STREET CITY M&O W/SW M&O WO/SW M&O W/SW RATE M&O WO/SW RATE TOTAL ASMT PROPERTY ADDRESS 2903020330002 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3103020130002 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 1903020440017 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3103020130001 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3103020130002 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3103020120001 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3103020140048 216 4TH ST N PO BOX 242 STILLWATER MN 55082-0242 $0.00 3003020110019 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 1903020440021 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 1903020440020 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 1903020440019 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 3003020110017 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 3003020110020 216 FOURTH ST STILLWATER MN 55082 $0.00 48.5 261.5 $750,459.75 Highlighted properties are on both Reconstructioin and Mill & Overlay 10 9/30/2021 Uwater THE RTHPLACE O F M i N N E S 0 1 A PLANNING REPORT TO: City Council MEETING DATE: 10/05/2021 REQUEST: Chestnut Street Plaza Updates and Change Orders LOCATION: Chestnut Street (South of Main Street, North of Lift Bridge) DISTRICT: CBD: Central Business District REPORT BY: Tim Gladhill, Community Development Director INTRODUCTION In 2020, the City Council authorized design services with TKDA for the Chestnut Street Plaza, following the previous concept planning process. The City Council chose to move forward with the development of construction plans after MnDOT awarded the City $2,000,000 towards the project for design and construction. The grant specifies that the City is responsible for 50% of the design costs. MnDOT will pay 100% of eligible construction costs up until the total grant award. MnDOT's contribution will not exceed $2,000,000 including their 50% contribution to design costs and 100% contribution to eligible construction costs. The City's Project Manager, TKDA, is working on completed 60% Plans with the intent to have fully completed construction plans by the end of the year and be able to bid the project in early 2022. Staff is seeking direction on several items in order to be able to move forward to next steps. Several changes were made to the current plan set after initial review, and the current total cost estimate is approximately $2,400,000 for planning purposes. While there are a number of other technical comments on the current plan set, this case is focused on review comments that require City Council Policy -Level Direction. SPECIFIC REQUEST There are two (2) main requests associated with this request. 1. Approve Contract Amendment with TKDA in the amount of $79,866.50 to comply with MnDOT Review Comments and other project delays a. 50% of the design costs are reimbursed by MnDOT 2. Approve Planning Level Cost Estimate of $2,500,000 and identify Pooled TIF Dollars as the Funding Source for the City Contribution a. This is for planning purposes only — this action does not obligate the City to expenses at this time October 1, 2021 Page 2 ANALYSIS Environmental Site Assessment As with any construction project, an environmental site assessment is a critical step to ensure that unexpected site conditions are not found after the project commences resulting in costly change orders to the project. Since MnDOT Funds are being used for construction and MnDOT remains the underlying Property Owner, a Phase II ESA shall be required. The cost for the Phase II ESA is $20,497.50, with 50% reimbursed by MnDOT. Additional Design Comments Below are highlights of the current updates. Staff is highlighting review by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO Review is required as the project is located within the Stillwater Commercial Historic District and is connected to the Stillwater Lift Bridge, both listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). All other comments are able to be addressed without additional policy direction. Pavers MnDOT has approved the use of pavers for the plaza, with the exception of the sidewalks, which will be poured concrete. As the project is located within the Historic Downtown District, the plans are also reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). SHPO has requested that only one (1) color paver be used, not two (2) as currently shown. Street Lights/Cafe Lighting SHPO has expressed concern with the design of the street lights (height) and the intent to use the street light poles to string cafe lighting and banners. Staff has set up a meeting with SHPO to discuss further and advocate for the current design. Sidewalk Width and Design SHPO also made certain notes about sidewalk width and design. Staff believes there was certain miscommunication and believes the current design complies with these most recent comments. Staff will clarify at our upcoming meeting with SHPO. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve Design Services Agreement Change Order No. 1 and Direct Staff to continue plan preparation as originally guided (with amendments to comply with current plan comments) and allocate $400,000 of City Funds towards the project (for planning purposes at this time). 2. Direct Staff to explore additional revisions to the concept plan to remove/revise the following to reduce costs and bring back specific options at a future date (based on discussion): a. Pavers October 1, 2021 Page 3 b. Stormwater Pipe c. Landscaping d. Streetscape and Street Furniture e. Street Light Upgrades/Replacement 3. Deny Design Services Agreement Change Order No. 1 and cancel project (MnDOT and City have each already paid approximately $90,000 ($180, 000 total in design costs) towards the current plan set). RECOMMENDATION Based on previous discussion, public engagement and Council Direction, Staff would recommend continuing forward with the original concept and allocating the additional dollars to the project. The City invested significant time and energy into the concept planning stages of the project including significant public engagement. Additionally, the City has already had to do one (1) significant design concept revision. With the amount of public engagement that went into this project, Staff is concerned that community trust will decrease if the City does not follow through with the project or makes significant changes (again) to the overall concept. Finally, this plaza is a highly visible and important improvement project for our community and serves as a predominant gateway to our community Attachments: Resolution Requested TKDA Contract Amendment Current Concept Plan City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- RESOLUTION APPROVING TKDA REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1, ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR CHESTNUT STREET PLAZA WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the City Council approved a contract with TKDA for design services related to the Chestnut Street Plaza Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, after review comments were received on the 60% Plan Set, it was determined that additional design services were required. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA: 1. The Request for Amendment No. 1 for additional landscape architecture and engineering design services is hereby approved. 2. For planning purposes, $400,000 from pooled TIF Dollars is tentatively allocated to the project. This does not obligate the City to this expense; this is for planning purposes only at this time. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of October, 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk ri 7J TKDA September 22, 2021 Via Email: tladhill@ci.stillwater.mn.us Mr. Tim Gladhill Community Development Director City of Stillwater 216 4th Street North Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Request for Amendment No.01, Additional Landscape Architectural and Engineering Design Services Chestnut Street Plaza TKDA Project No.17906.000 Dear Mr. Gladhill: TKDA proposes to amend our contract with the City of Stillwater to include additional Landscape Architectural and Engineering Services in connection with the Chestnut Street Plaza Project. Our services will be provided in the manner described in this amendment request and is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in our original Agreement with the City of Stillwater Contract dated March 27, 2020 for the Project, as hereinafter stated: Based on communications and previous meetings with City of Stillwater staff, additional and amended services include: 1. Modify Exhibit A, Detailed Work Plan, Design Development (DD) as follows: A. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (DD) 1. Additional project management due to extended project schedule. 2. Stormwater overflow modeling and design, includes utility relocation. 3. Signal replacement design: includes new signal, signal justification, cabinet and fiber relocation. 4. Construction drawings that meet MnDOT State Aid requirements in accordance with MnDOT funding requirements. 5. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment 2. Compensation for this Amendment shall be as follows: Amendment 1 Fees: Project management Stormwater design Signal replacement design Construction Documents — MnDOT requirements Phase II Enviromental Site Assessment Amendment 1 Total Original Agreement Total Amended Project Total $ 3,276.00 $ 18,078.00 $ 11,200.00 $ 26,815.00 $ 20,497.50 $ 79,866.50 $261,125.00 $340,991.50 We thank you for the opportunity to submit this Amendment request. This proposed amendment will be open for acceptance for 30 days, unless the provisions herein are changed by us in writing prior to that time. Should you accept this request, please issue the appropriate amendment for our review and signature. Please contact Kathleen Anglo at 612.845.5991 or kathleen.anglo@tkda.com if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Kathleen W. Anglo Project Manager KWA:DJH:amc:jks An employee -owned company promoting affirmative action and equal opportunity. DJ Heinle, AIA Vice President, Architecture WATER STREET INN -0111111.11 si //On' tAt A- w 1- "dgm, .0•1-- CHESTNUT ST E w 73, Olt=1 0 W ce X 0 cc 0 I— tn STILLWATER LIFT BRIDGE CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Site Plan 02.12.2021 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA II I a 111111I11111111111I 11 I111111111" MN NICE CREAM LEO'S PATIO Ilgi�iImij -.,T 1 ,`+'r:7, T�TT - • 717777/77,.r.T - v.--r-r- 'l'PF. �++-• - - - GARTNER STUDIO MOVABLE SEATING �Z) LINEAR SEATING OVERSTORY TREES n CAFE STYLE LIGHTING 1 O BIKE RACKS BOLLARDS O CURB BUMP -OUT CHESTNI IT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Block "A" Plan 02.12.2021 illwater TH PLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA THE BIRTHPLACE WATER STREET INN 7 w w 0 ce a MOVABLE SEATING L C CI> E INEAR SEATING OLUMNAR TREES ENCH SEATING BIKE RACKS BOLLARDS BIKE ROUNDABOUT PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS IM II I II I II I I II CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Block "B" Plan 02.12.2021 THE BIR ilwate.i., THPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA CHESTNI IT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Block "A" Perspective 0212.2021 illwater t THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA 1 LUMBERJACK • DAYS CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Block "A" Perspective (Alternative) 02.12.2021 illwater THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Block "B" Perspective 0212.2021 _illy, , z THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA 8'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" : 8'-0" 20' 8'-0" 2'-0" 2'-0" : 8'-0" SIDEWALK ZONE FIXTURES & DRAINAGE PARKING ZONE MIXED USE CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Section A -A' 0212.2021 PARKING ZONE IXTURES & DRAINAGE 5' SIDEWALK ZONE 10' 15' THE BIR graphic scale ilwate.i., THPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA TRAIL CROSSING BLOCK A 1 WATER ST CROSSING BLOCK B CHESTNUT STREET CIVIC PLAZA I REVISED CONCEPT Section B-B' 02.12.2021 CONCOURSE THE BIR ilwate.i., 1 THPLACE OF MINNESOTA TKDA MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City CounciltC FROM: Reabar Abdullah, Assistant City Engineer DATE: October 1, 2021 SUBJECT: 2021 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project Project 2021-06 DISCUSSION The bid opening for the 2021 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project was on, September 3rd at 10:00 a.m. Two bids were received: 1. George Siegfried Construction Company 2. Vinco, Inc. $84,000.38 $68,556.00 The lowest bidder is 50% more than the Engineer's estimate for the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council reject these bids and propose to combine the sidewalk project with 2022 street improvement project to obtain more favorable bids. City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021- REJECTING BID AND PROPOSE REBID IN SPRING 2022 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROJECT (Project 2021-06) WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2021 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Project, two bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement; and BIDDER George Siegfried Construction Company Vinco, Inc. Engineer's Estimate BID AMOUNT $84,000.38 $68,556.00 $45,540.00 WHEREAS, the lowest bidder is 50% higher than the Engineers estimate NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, MINNESOTA, the bids for the 2021 Sidewalk Project be rejected and rebid in the spring of 2022. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 5th day of October 2021. CITY OF STILLWATER Ted Kozlowski, Mayor ATTEST: Beth Wolf, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: iliwater ,---.. Administration Mayor & City Council Tom McCarty, City Administrator Donna Robole, Human Resources Manager September 28, 2021 Stillwater Classification/Compensation Wage Schedule — Comparative Market Analysis RFP Responses — Recommendation Accepting Most Responsive Quote and Authorizing Agreement for Services BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2016, the City of Stillwater implemented a new Classification/Compensation system for city employees. An extensive analysis of city positions, job duties, comparative market review, staff discussion, appeals process and bargaining unit ratification of the new system preceded implementation. The Class/Comp system defines the wage ranges for all employee positions in the City. Since 2016, the City Council has annually approved an incremental base wage adjustment to the system wage schedule corresponding to wage rate adjustments included in bargaining units contract agreements. Over the past 18 months, the City has found it increasingly difficult to recruit talented individuals to fill vacant positions and to retain talented employees due to non-competitive wage rates for some city positions. On August 10, 2021 the City Council authorized issuance of an RFP to solicit consultant proposals for a comparative market analysis of the City's current Class/Comp wage schedule and provide recommendations for any necessary adjustments. The RFP was issued on August 30, 2021, eighteen consulting firms received copies of the RFP and proposals were submitted by five consulting firms prior to the submittal deadline of September 24, 2021 as follows: Abdo, Eick & Meyers DDA Human Resources, Inc. Flaherty -Hood, P.A. GovHR USA McGrath Human Resources Group RECOMMENDATION: $21,500 $15,000 $ 9,000 $15,660 $27,089 Following a review and analysis of the proposals, including a review of proposed services, market comparative methodology, consultant staff assigned to the project and review of references, staff recommends acceptance of the proposal from GovHR USA in the amount of $15,660 as the lowest responsible cost proposal best meeting the needs of the City. Funds for completion of the study to be expended from the City Council professional services account. Staff also recommends that the City Attorney and City Administrator proceed to finalize a professional services agreement with GovHR USA for the provision of these services and that the City Administrator sign all necessary documents on behalf of the City. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution titled "Approving Proposal and Awarding Professional Services Contract to GovHR USA for Completion of a Comparative Market Analysis of the City's Classification Compensation Wage Schedule". City of Stillwater Washington County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 2021-XXX RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL AND AWARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO GOVHR USA FOR COMPLETION OF A COMPARATIVE MARKET ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S CLASSIFICATION COMPENSATION WAGE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, in 2016, the City of Stillwater implemented a new city employee Classification Compensation system following an extensive analysis of city positions, job duties, comparative market review, staff discussion, appeals process and bargaining unit ratification of the new system; and WHEREAS, over the past eighteen months, the City has found it increasingly difficult to recruit talented individuals to fill vacant positions and to retain talented employees due to non- competitive wage rates for some city positions; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorized issuance of an RFP to solicit consultant proposals for a comparative market analysis of the City's current Class/Comp wage schedule and provide recommendations for any necessary adjustments; and WHEREAS, the City received proposals from five (5) consulting firms and based on city staff review and analysis of the proposals, staff recommends approval of the proposal and award of the professional services contract to GovHR USA in amount of $15,660 as the lowest responsible cost proposal best meeting the needs of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Stillwater, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposal from GovHR USA to complete a Comparative Market Analysis of the City's Classification Compensation Wage Schedule is hereby accepted; 2. The professional services contract as the lowest responsible cost proposal best meeting the needs of the City is awarded to GovHR USA to perform the Comparative Market Analysis of the City's Classification Compensation Wage Schedule in the amount of $15,660. 3. Approves and directs the City Administrator and City Attorney finalize and prepare a professional services contract between the City of Stillwater and GovHR USA for the completion of a Comparative Market Analysis of the City's Classification Compensation Wage Schedule and authorizes the City Administrator to sign said professional services contract. Adopted by the Stillwater City Council this 20th day of July 2021. ATTEST: CITY OF STILLWATER Beth Wolf, City Clerk Ted Kozlowski, Mayor Holiday Lighting and Design 133 Harrison Avenue South I Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 6123827528 I holidaydesignmn@gmail.com www.TrimlightMN.com RECIPIENT: Stillwater Lift Bridge St Croix River Chestnut St E Stuillwater, MN 55082 SERVICE ADDRESS: St Croix River Chestnut St E Stuillwater, MN 55082 Quote #420 Sent on Oct 01, 2021 Total $31,429.58 PRODUCT / SERVICE DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE TOTAL Seasonal Holiday Lighting (C9)- Purchased - Bridge Outline, South Side of Bridge Only - Magnetic (Removable) Clips Seasonal Holiday Lighting (C9) - Purchased - Bridge Outline, North Side Misc. South Facing Side with walkway Total - 3129' @ $6.00 per strand (Magnetic Socket Wire) - $3.25 LF Purchased Added a 300' Buffer for Additional lights 10% 3 Year warranty on all purchased lights Each year going forward on lift bridge : $9429.75 South Facing Side with walkway Total - 3129' @ $6.25 per strand (Magnetic Socket Wire) - $3.25 LF Purchased Added a 300' Buffer for Additional lights 10% 3 Year warranty on all purchased lights Each year going forward on lift bridge : $9429.75 scissor Lift for South side of bridge 3429 3429 $2.77 $9,498.33 $6.25 $21,431.25 1 $500.00 $500.00* 1 of 2 pages Holiday Lighting and Design 133 Harrison Avenue South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 6123827528 I holidaydesignmn@gmail.com www.TrimlightMN.com Total * Non-taxable Price on product has increased .25 cents due to shipping and covid Price for barge is still undetermined. This quote is valid for the next 30 days, after which values may be subject to change. 5 Year Labor Warranty, 50,000 Hour Product Warranty, Controller/Box/Power Supply - Included Signature: Date: $31,429.58 2 of 2 pages Holiday Lighting and Design 133 Harrison Avenue South I Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 6123827528 I holidaydesignmn@gmail.com www.TrimlightMN.com RECIPIENT: City of Stillwater Rooflines - Main Street Main Street Stillwater SERVICE ADDRESS: Main Street Stillwater Quote #421 Sent on Oct 01, 2021 Total $5,700.00 PRODUCT / SERVICE DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT TOTAL PRICE Seasonal Misc. Accessories 3500 magnets to fix all of the broken magnet clips 3500 on Main Street. $0.60 $2,100.00* 2021 Seasonal Holiday Re install Seasonal Lighting 18 $200.00 $3,600.00 Lighting Reinstall Labor to Reinstall all of the magnets and lights 18 Hours at $200.00 Per hour Total * Non-taxable This quote is valid for the next 30 days, after which values may be subject to change. 5 Year Labor Warranty, 50,000 Hour Product Warranty, Controller/Box/Power Supply - Included $5,700.00 1 of 2 pages Holiday Lighting and Design 133 Harrison Avenue South I Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 6123827528 I holidaydesignmn@gmail.com I www.TrimlightMN.com Notes Continued... Signature: Date: 2 of 2 pages Washington ^'County FYI BOARD AGENDA October 5, 2021 - 9:00 AM 1. 9:00 Ro11 Ca11 Pledffe of Allegiance 2. 9:00 Comments from the Public Board of Commissioners Fran Miron, District 1 Stan Karwoski, District 2 Gary Kriesel, District 3 Wayne A. Johnson, District 4 Lisa Weik, Chair, District 5 Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board Clerk or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board of Commissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. 3. 9:10 Consent Calendar - Roll Ca11 Vote Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action. A. Approval to appoint Karl Olson, Oak Park Heights, to the Mental Health Advisory Committee as a Consumer Representative, to a partial term expiring December 31, 2023. B. Approve revisions to Policy #6006 Advisory Committees, Boards, and Commissions. C. Approve revisions to Human Resources Personnel Rules and Regulations - Section #17 Insurance/Benefits. D. Approval of a special project Human Resources Generalist position in the Human Resources Department. E. 1. Approval of Contract No. 14325 with Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. (ACI) in the amount of $439,640.89 for construction services of the Forest Lake Parking Lot Improvement Project. 2. Approval of Permanent Use of Fund Balance in an amount not to exceed of $479,800. 4. 9:10 Community Services - Jennifer Castillo, Director A. Adopt a resolution to accept additional Emergency Rental Assistance 1 (ERA1) program funds from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) 5. 9:20 Information Technology - Renee Heinbuch, Director A. Adopt a resolution to recognize October 2021 as Cybersecurity Awareness Month. Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 Washington County is an equal opportunity organization and employer Washington County 6. 9:30 General Administration - Kevin Corbid, County Administrator A. Federal Legislative Report B. Summary of the County Administrator's Performance Review. 7. 10:30 Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff. This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting. 8. 10:45 Board Correspondence 9. 10:45 Adjourn Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 Washington County is an equal opportunity organization and employer Washington ^'County 1. 9:00 Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance BOARD AGENDA September 28, 2021 - 9:00 AM 2. 9:00 Comments from the Public Board of Commissioners Fran Miron, District 1 Stan Karwoski, District 2 Gary Kriesel, District 3 Wayne A. Johnson, District 4 Lisa Weik, Chair, District 5 Visitors may share their comments or concerns on any issue that is a responsibility or function of Washington County Government, whether or not the issue is listed on this agenda. Persons who wish to address the Board must fill out a comment card before the meeting begins and give it to the County Board Clerk or the County Administrator. The County Board Chair will ask you to come to the podium, state your name and city of residence, and present your comments. Your comments must be addressed exclusively to the Board Chair and the full Board of Commissioners. Comments addressed to individual Board members will not be allowed. You are encouraged to limit your presentation to no more than five minutes. The Board Chair reserves the right to limit an individual's presentation if it becomes redundant, repetitive, overly argumentative, or if it is not relevant to an issue that is part of Washington County's responsibilities. 3. 9:10 Consent Calendar - Roll Call Vote Consent Calendar items are generally defined as items of routine business, not requiring discussion, and approved in one vote. Commissioners may elect to pull a Consent Calendar item(s) for discussion and/or separate action. A. Approval of the September 7, 2021, County Board meeting minutes. B. Approve Contract No. 14294 with CliftonLarsonAllen LLP in the amount of $99,000, from date of final signature through September 30, 2022. C. Adopt a resolution to accept grant funding from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for ongoing services to victims of crime in the amount of $280,000.00 for the fiscal years of 2022 and 2023. D. 1. Adopt a resolution to authorize Washington County to accept grant funds from the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs in the amount of $17,500 for the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. 2. Approve a grant agreement between the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs and Washington County in the amount of $17,500 for the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. E. Approval of the plat of Oldfield Acres in May Township. F. Adopt a resolution certifying to the county auditor unpaid County Environmental Charges (CEC) and order the county auditor to extend the assessments with interest upon the tax rolls of the county. G. Approve an amendment to Grant Agreement No. 13735 with the Minnesota Department of Health increasing the grant award to $514,487, for the period of November 1, 2021, through October 31, 2022. H. Approve Grant Agreement No. 14298 with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in the amount of $786,495 for waste reduction and recycling activities. Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 Washington County is an equal opportunity organization and employer Washington 0' County Consent Calendar continued I. Approval of License No. 14312 to Use Real Property Agreement with Metro Bowhunters Resources Base (MBRB) for deer management in designated areas within Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park, Lake Elmo Park Reserve, and St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park. J. 1. Award bid and authorize execution of Contract No. 14311 in the amount $395,270.50 with Interstate Improvement, Inc. for concrete grinding of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 16 (Valley Creek Road) from Bielenberg Drive to CSAH 13 (Radio Drive) in the City of Woodbury. 2. Approve a Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for performance surveys of concrete grinding on CSAH 16. K. Approve Contract No. 14321 with Isthmus Engineering in the amount of $182,380.80 for Computer Aided Design (CAD) Support on County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 12 from County Line Road to Wildwood Road. L. Approve Grant Agreement No. 14322 between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety and the Washington County Sheriffs Office for Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) Officer enforcement in the amount of $124,564.75. M. Approve Grant Agreement No. 14062 between the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, and Washington County in the amount of $58,306 for COVID-19 response. N. Adopt a resolution and approve Agreement No. 14268 between the Washington County Sheriffs Office and the City of Hugo, Minnesota, to provide law enforcement services to the city. O. Adopt a resolution and approve Agreement No. 14328 between the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office and the Washington County Sheriffs Office for inmate housing. P. Approval of Joint Powers Cooperative Agreement with the Metropolitan Counties of Anoka, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Sherburne, Stearns, Washington, and Wright to establish the Metropolitan 911 Board to carry out the requirements of counties under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 403 for the establishment of a 911 telephone system in the seven - county metropolitan area. 4. 9:10 Property Records and Taxpayer Services - Deb Ledvina, Director A. Adopt a resolution honoring staff in the Property Records and Taxpayer Services Department and declaring October 4-8, 2021, Customer Service Week in Washington County. Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 Washington County is an equal opportunity organization and employer Washington County 5. 9:20 General Administration - Kevin Corbid, County Administrator A. 1. Presentation to consider an amendment to the county's American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) project plan, and provide $750,000 in ARPA funds to the City of Stillwater, as subrecipient, for sewer and water infrastructure. 2. Public Comment 3. Consideration to adopt a resolution amending the county's American Rescue Plan Act project plan. 6. 10:00 Commissioner Reports - Comments - Questions This period of time shall be used by the Commissioners to report to the full Board on committee activities, make comments on matters of interest and information, or raise questions to the staff This action is not intended to result in substantive board action during this time. Any action necessary because of discussion will be scheduled for a future board meeting. 7. 10:15 Board Correspondence 8. 10:20 Executive (Closed) Session - Public Works A. Executive (closed) session pursuant to Minn Stat. § 13D.05 subd. 3(c)(3), to review offer and counteroffer for the purchase of the property located at PID 06.029.20.21.0002 as it pertains to its purchase for future road extension of County State Aid Highway 15 South Segment. 9. 10:40 Executive (Closed) Session - Review of the County Administrator A. Executive (closed) session to conduct the annual performance review for County Administrator Kevin Corbid. 10. 11:40 Adjourn 11. 11:40-12:00 Break 12. 12:00-1:00 Board Workshop with Public Health & Environment A. County progress toward meeting state waste management goals. 13. 1:05 Personnel Committee 14. 1:35 Finance Committee Assistive listening devices are available for use in the County Board Room If you need assistance due to disability or language barrier, please call (651) 430-6000 Washington County is an equal opportunity organization and employer