The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNorth Aiple Master Park Plan (Lumberjack Landing).916 NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN TILLWATER, MINNESOTA Approved by the Stillwater City Council December 1, 2020 A ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Stillwater City Council Ted Kozlowski (Mayor) Ryan Collins Ward 1 David Junker Ward 2 Tom Weidner Ward 3 Mike Polehna Ward 4 Stillwater Park and Recreation Commission Linda Amrein David Brandt Scott Christensen Pamela Jo Johnson Tim Moore Sam Nelson Mike Polehna Sandy Snellman Stephanie Souter Staff Bill Turnblad, Community Development Director Abbi Jo Wittman, City Planner Graham Tait, Zoning Administrator Consultants HKGi - park planning and landscape architecture FOR - natural resources MDA - architecture NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN 0 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT BACKGROUND. 4 Project Purpose 4 Site Context 4 Existing Site Conditions 6 Existing Site Images, .8 Timeline of North Aiple Park's History. 12 Previous Planning .14 Public & Stakeholder Engagement .14 02 DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 16 Aiple Residence. 22 Proposed Building Modifications. 24 03 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN. 26 Overview 26 Landscape Description. 26 Site Inventory. 27 Stewardship Goals and Management Recommendations. 29 04 IMPLEMENTATION & COST ESTIMATES. 32 Phasing 32 Development Phasing Plan 33 Development Costs. 34 Vegetation Management Phasing & Cost Estimate. 35 Funding Options & Sources. 36 Operations and Maintenance Considerations. 37 05 APPENDIX. 38 Conceptual Site Planning (2016-2017), 38 Zephyr Theatre Parking Expansion: Exhibit A. 43 Concept Plan: Impervious Surface Calculations. 44 Development Cost Estimate Detail 45 Vegetation Management Cost Estimate Detail. 46 Summary of Online Input (Social Pinpoint), 48 Other Background Items (Baseline Report, Conservation Easement, Phase 1 Report) 52 DECEMBER 1, 2020 NORTH AIPLE PARK Property Features 0.6 mile of St. Croix River shoreline • 15 acres total • Grotto and natural seeps along the rocky bluffs lining the west side of the property • Pond on the north side of the property with foot path around its circumference • Aiple residence (1960s home situated in the middle of the property with views of the river) CONSERVATION EASEMENT Washington County holds a Conservation Easement over the Aiple property which limits development of the site. Of note are the following requirements: The City agrees to develop the site as a public park, restore much of the property to natural conditions, provide passive recreational uses, complete a management plan, and own and maintain the property. There is to be no development on the site that increases the amount of impervious surface on site. INTRODUCTION & PROJECT BACKGROUND PROJECT PURPOSE This planning document is meant to guide the future development and vegetation management for the City of Stillwater's North Aiple Park property located on the St. Croix River. Guided by the approved concept plan and in compliance with the property's conservation easement, the master plan utilizes community input regarding site needs and improvements as well as outlines, in detail, the vegetation management of the site. This master plan builds upon work that was completed in 2017 to create an updated conceptual master plan for the site. Recommendations in the previous plan include a connection to the Brown's Creek State Trail, addition of an ADA accessible fishing pier, additional loop trails throughout the park, interpretive signage and trailhead facilities, and restoration of vegetation and natural shoreline improvements. The current master planning process has evolved those recommendations and considers potential reuse of the existing building on the site. SITE CONTEXT North Aiple Park is located in northeast Stillwater, along the St. Croix River. The Brown's Creek State Trail runs along the west side of the property. Minnesota State Highway 95 runs north and south along the west side of the property and provides vehicular access to the site. Historic downtown Stillwater is located less than one mile south of the park site. The property includes over half a mile of river shoreline, with a sandy beach located near the Aiple residence. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN North Aiple Park Context Map • Legend - DNR Land ® Public Boat Access - Open Water Trailhead Downtown Stillwater Proposed Trails Project Site _ Existing Trails Stillwater Boundary ® Water Trail City Boundaries * Washington County, MN Regional Trail System State Pending Finalization* Boundaries • • • .♦ 1 :♦ • • • N • i ♦ • 0.25 0.5 I • Stillwater 1 • • • • 1 Brown's Creek • State Trail - Oak Park Heights MINNESOTA 1 Miles Baytown Stillwater Township St. Croix Boorr WISCONSIN • A A • • 111 Lift Bridge Loop Trail Baypnrt DECEMBER 1, 2020 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Site Character. � Pone! lilted with duckweed/mucky In places -- •I - Aeration could help ti ► Natural Pool and Cave • Major paint of interest 1 +i- 10' Berm along either side of path- - Very Steep • Some bu<kthornlundesirabfe species P i i y Street • - Re -engineering slops: to prevent erosion and Introduce beneficial species would he ideal Dilapidated Bridge • Used to be a lower path around pond • Cgultl create a baardwatk to introduce affother experieurtel vieWpi M Garage {creek runs beneath) • Coilld be repuipased to provide Information for natural resources interpretation 1- room for equipment stofage BI*a[IV Boat Launch Creek at hale of bluff Mid-century Rambler • Requires 1 million+ in f1VAC repiacement, adap!*d interiors, and ADA updates in order to Convert to a publiespace Lawn with scattered landscap-e beds and rendiant foundations - Landscaping does +tot create spates, shotitcaae removed at reconfigured Remnant foundations here could be 1ilghttghted and feature Interpretive elements Lawn with rows of evergreens • Spruces take up space without benefit. Should be removed Of limbed up tf possible. 'Adequate space/grade tar a carraefkayak launch If preferred to boat launch at beach, or an additional put•In is desired Wooded Lawn - Tree -lured Entry Drive • Vehicular Entrance Densely vegetated, swampy woods • Marty Invaslvesitindeslrable species present • Scattered demolition debrls {bricks, rebar, wire, etc,] - 2-5 acre VIC Area may contain impacted soils be Lew debris ltrnknownl West of Browns Creek State Trail and north of a ivting puLlic parking could be. selectively cleared and paved for expanded parking, or kept natural for seasonal natural surface trAllx rsnowshoeingIhlkingi, or an off leash dog park Gateway Opportunity Into Park from Downtown O 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feel NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Site Cross Sections fri t., Legend Non-native dedduous woodland Midwest dry limestone/dolostone cliff Oak forest mesic subtype ▪ Short grasses and mixed trees with Impervious cover • Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup 10' Contours ▪ St. Croix River Parcels 2015 Rivers and Streams Freshwater Emergent Weland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond DECEMBER 1, 2020 EXISTING SITE IMAGES Aiple Residence Area On the river, looking west toward the Aiple residence and over the existing steel sheetwalls that were used for boat docking. July 15, 2020. View of St. Croix River from site (looking northeast). July 15, 2020. View of beach, steel sheetwalls, and Aiple residence in background from St. Croix River (looking south). July 15, 2020. View of steel sheetwalls and beach in background (view from water, looking northwest). July 15, 2020. INORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN I View ofAiple residence from detached garage/shed. July 15, 2020. Existing detached garage/shed. July 15, 2020. 171M7Ji1:17:ai�11 1 Southern Part of Property Existing parking lot at southern end of site (looking south toward Zephyr Theater. July 15, 2020. Brown's Creek State Trail at southern end of site (looking east). July 15, 2020. Wooded river's edge in the southern part of the property (view from water). July 15, 2020. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Northern Part of Property Winter view of grotto and ice formations at northwest part of pond. January 27, 2020. Pond outlet structure with pond in background (looking west from berm footpath). July 15, 2020. Walking along the footpath around the pond. July 15, 2020. Pond outlet structure under downed trees (view from water looking west). July 15, 2020. Northern property edge (view from water looking west). July 15, View of St. Croix River from berm footpath (looking east). July 15, 2020. 2020. Winter view: Standing at the north end of the property looking south over the pond. January 27, 2020. DECEMBER 1, 2020 TIMELINE OF NORTH AIPLE PARK'S HISTORY 500,000,000 Years Ago: Shallow seas deposited sand and sediment that formed the bedrock we see today: marine sandstones, shales, and limestones from the Cambrian and Ordovician periods. 10,000 Years Ago: The St. Croix River served as a major drainage for glacial melt waters. Native Americans began occupying the St. Croix River valley. Greg Seitz I St. Croix 360 Late 1600s: Native Americans maintain a presence in the area. The name St. Croix for the river is first recorded. Many stories concerning the name St. Croix link it to the early French missionaries, or to a French fur trader who died at the river's mouth. March 4, 1854: The City of Stillwater is founded. This year, the Schulenburg and Boeckeler Lumber Mill is constructed on site (burned down in 1877). PREHISTORY Not to scale 1000 YEARS AGO 1,000,000 - 14,000 Years Ago: At least 4 glacial epochs deposited additional silt and sand, while ice and water shaped and wore away the rock formations in the St. Croix River valley 17th-19th Century: The St. Croix River was a favored fur trade route from the Mississippi River to Lake Superior. In 1838, the Tamarack House was built by Joseph Renshaw Brown, known as a forefather of Stillwater. 1837: A treaty opened the area to settlement by Euro-Americans. 1884-1888: Northwest Manufacturing Company used the site as a paint shop for rail cars .CPMed .015 i. _ Lrdl *EUT Lind • AMIa IW1aaha* Cudcd Urals In &IMAM- AM Sources: Barr Engineering Environmental Site Assessment, National Park Service, St. Croix 360, Washington County Historical Society, Minnesota Historical Society NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN 1888-1889: Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company had boarding houses, a steam dry kiln, a foundry, and manufacturing warehouses on site. 1901-1904: 7,500 sf warehouse/ steam dry kiln demolished 1888-1904: Staples Atlee Saw Mill Co located a sawmill onsite and used the area for lumber storage. 1884-1916: The property had rail lines on site to support businesses and served as a rail and lumber yard. 1904-1916: Northwest Thresher Company had a materials storage shed, a foundry, a cleaning and castings facility, a paint shop, and a separator warehouse on site. 1916-1924: 30,000 sf warehouse building/ paint shop demolished 1957: The Aiple family buys the property 1965: The Aiple residence is constructed on the former site of the Schulenburg and Boeckeler Lumber Mill 2014: Washington County purchases the property for public recreation. 2006: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment performed by Barr Engineering 1938-1949: Assorted fill is dumped on the land within the park. 1838 Aeria 2020: North Aiple Park Master Plan adopted 2017: Initial concept plan for the park developed. DECEMBER 1, 2020 CONCEPT PLAN Site Character AL 2017 Preliminary Concept Plan for the Aiple property North Aiple Park: Public Outreach Methods • Press Release • Project web page on City's website • Flyer posted in local businesses • Social Media (Facebook) • Constant contact email list • POLCO (citizen engagement tool) • Social Pinpoint Project web page on City's website PREVIOUS PLANNING In 2016 and 2017, the City conducted a process to evaluate site conditions and develop a preliminary site concept plan. Input from stakeholders, City staff and elected officials helped develop the high level concept for the property. Recommendations in the previous plan included a connection to the Brown's Creek State Trail, addition of an ADA accessible fishing pier, additional loop trails throughout the park, interpretive signage and trailhead facilities, and restoration of vegetation and natural shoreline improvements. The previous concept plan can be found in the Appendix of this document. PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Engagement & Input Stakeholder Meeting A meeting was held at Stillwater City Hall on March 5, 2020, with representatives from local, state, and national agencies who were invited to provide input on the previously developed concept and discuss implementation of potential improvements. Notable considerations include: • For the Wild and Scenic River designation, anything under the High Water Level mark needs NPS review before construction. • The National Park Service and the St. Croix River Association are interested in seeing a kayak/canoe launch on the site as this is a missing amenity in Stillwater, and it would be used by educational programs. • There are potential partnership and funding opportunities for trail connections and kayak/canoe facilities through federal and state (DNR) grants. • Priorities for the future of the site are to not degrade it, but rather improve the natural vegetation and landscape, and to provide a place where people can "touch the river" in Stillwater. .11 ifE4� • t Help Us Plan for the Future of North Aiple Park! What's Going On? Over the next year, the City of Stillwater is creating a master nb r North Piple ark. Themaster plan will include al long-range vision for the park and guide future decisions about park activities, capital investments, potential reuse of the existing building, and natural resource restoration. Initial conceptplanning for the then newly acquired property °ccured In Cie J. The project team Is soliciting feedback on this concept plan In order to begin to evolve the design. How Can l Be Involved? Provide input on the 2017 North Aiple Park Concept Plan on Social Pinpoint: https://hkgi. mysoci al p i n poi nt.com /north -a i p le - park -master -plan#/ For updates and more information, visit: www.ci.stillwatermmus/NorthAipleParkPlan Wok Outreach flyer NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN • There is interest in screening the shoreline by planting natural vegetation in places where the lawn is exposed to the river. • Low impact and low profile structures should be considered for any future facilities and amenities on the site. Online Engagement General public engagement was conducted online with an online interactive mapping tool (Social Pinpoint) with complementary survey questions. The Social Pinpoint site presented the 2017 Concept Plan for the North Aiple Park property and asked viewers to provide comments on the map by dragging pins to geographic point and providing associated comments. The page also included a short survey asking the following questions: • What proposed park features do you like? • What elements do not make sense? • Do you have specific thoughts or ideas on other ways you'd like to use the park? The Social Pinpoint page was open during the month of February, 2020, and received 7,515 total site visits to the page; 87 comments provided on the site map and previous concept plan; and 105 responses to the survey questions. Overall there was high interest expressed by public input in paddle sports, passive recreation (including hiking trails along the river), beach access, fishing, and restoration. When asking about the importance of preserving and reusing the existing building on the site, greater than 50% indicated preservation of the house was 'important' or'very important There was also interest expressed in adding amenities for park users, such as restrooms, picnic facilities, and seating or overlook areas. Most survey respondents desire natural vegetation and restoration to be employed throughout the site to keep a feeling of natural beauty, peace, and quiet. There was mixed input on parking on the site. Generally, respondents think the site should be accessible for all ages and abilities, but are concerned that providing parking will create overuse of the park. Detailed survey responses can be found in the Appendix. Social Pinpoint website screenshot showing interactive map with public comments and survey questions North Aiple Park: Agency Stakeholders • MN DNR • National Park Service • U.S. Corps of Engineergs • U.S. Coast Guard Lower St. Croix Management Commission • State Historic Preservation Office • Middle St. Croix WMO • MN DOT • Washington SWCD • Washington County • St. Croix River Association II p4 anin r.Yh.cn or apac■ 1E.a tit 1 i access I 3 i ▪ fl 2 n at u r. I p1..s.Yr �- II' Arkin F ' • ,.S4k*actima. ihoi.iiY,ttti . ..:rpwrIKIHF 1'rrlwn• trimming Milf " Imntlrork ti d rat • YrovL Mcr kcrs place = CL Word Cloud highlighting the most used words in online comments from the public on future use of the Aiple property 4 0 .017 Cori i Suiv€i YP.w npra.wmin wu M mu mobil**,■ fin Hirsh ftria ti= +nq aJ'n ram myth .•swa mokii 15 DESIGN RESOURCES & CONSIDERATIONS • The River Management Society and the NPS created a document with design guidelines for launches: https://issuu.com/ rivermanagementsociety/ docs/prepare to launch update april 201 • For the Wild and Scenic River designation, anything under the High Water Level mark needs NPS review before construction. The DNR has a Cooperative Management Plan for the river under Parks and Trails • DNR rules: - River Way Ordinance — State Rules — setbacks - Public Waters permitting DEVELOPMENT PLAN This section guides the future development of park facilities and amenities, such as trails, picnic areas, parking areas, and structures. The overall theme of the North Aiple Park development is passive, riverfront recreation. The development concept plan identifies proposed features at a conceptual level. Final implementation and construction of concept plan elements may differ from what is shown in this plan according to issues and opportunities that arise during the design and engineering process. While planning development features, consideration was given to existing infrastructure, natural site features, the desire to provide access to the river, the desire to provide access from the Brown's Creek State Trail to the site amenities, and requirements of the Conservation Easement. Major development recommendations include: • An ADA accessible kayak/canoe launch near the Aiple residence with an adjacent sandy beach for group kayak/canoe launching • Rehabilitation of the existing detached garage/shed to create a picnic shelter and overlook of the groundwater -fed creek • Accessible trails running the length of the site as well as connecting to the Brown's Creek State Trail • Natural surface trails through wooded areas • Picnic areas, benches, and overlooks for river viewing and fishing, along trails where feasible • An individual and small group kayak/canoe launch at the southern end of the site with stairs and potential canoe slide • Expanded parking at the southern end of the site in partnership with the Zephyr Theatre parking • Rehabilitation and remodeling of the existing Aiple residence to create an outdoor recreation focused building with public access to restrooms, potential crew boat storage, paddlecraft rental vendor space, and picnic patio/pavilion NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Development Concept Plan Repair existing fence. Explore TelQiati0n alternatives. HOW t narvral pool d grotto as a Feature /interpretive opportunity Repair western ri boundary fence {4n the east side of the state trail) ADA. accessible pedestrian trail connection to State 3raII. Confrere surface th•feet widei from State. Trait to circle drive- Bike racks provided tar bikers who want ra walk the rk pa trails.. f Parallel Parking: ADAy handicapped accessibfe spots, t suet for staff parking Add a natural vegetation strip between driveway and creek where fea#ibfe Existing driveway entrance tc-remain forI ermined groups, staff, and AL parking only ,odd directional iignage allowing ADA parking and drop off in the park to [he north and general public par IIny to the sorttl+ Sep Exhibit A. Expansion of Eublic parliing lot north of tephyr Theatre & entrance road realignment Potential 20-24 space parking lot for ttallhead and:south boat 'launch; Work with Zephyr Theatte on pulAtiprivate usebf parking lot r t is Extend storm sewer approximately 50' Io the southeast Qufref residential ast from park with vegetdiion (15- ft coax, height); Explore water sensitive plantings to discourage access to tie private property along the shoreline Bench and overlook at end of ADA accessible trail Improve existing path around Former trout pond Into natural surface trail loop {Nat ADA accessible ark river Ile due to siaperdtmenslonsl Existing welt structure/pond outlet i;e outlet pike Preserve pond, passible reuse for family fishing Extend .arid improve existing trail route and rehabilitate existing foot bridge Feature Ia] rlehabllltate existing garage into picnic Shelter, overlook structure with metal grate floor to see water run under the structure ADA ACCESSIBLE PADDLE LAUNCH Platform for ADA accessible paddle craft launch with adjacent sandy beach for group launching Exlstfng steel sheet seawall structure -• Riepurpose for ADA accessible overlooks fishing pier Turn-araundreguipment drop -toff Existing IV high retaining wall Repurpose existing garage for vendor/rental equipment area Selective demolition of house and construction of new recreation budding (3-season flexible use space for outdoor education programming, rextrooms, and boat storage) Farmer pool room converted to crew boat storage and open- air pavilion; access to public restrooms Remove white spruce and add pollinator -friendly plantings Paved ADA accessible trail to the woods edge and picnic area Picnic area, install concrete pad far 1- picnic tables New pedestrian trait - natural surface mowed grass path (Keep above the ftoedplalrt} Shoreline plantings/restoration along river Improve existing iree,llned driveway as a permeable asphalt surface with new pull -offs (occasional wider stretches needed to allow oncoming vehicles to pass by1 1 QO Year flood elevation Preserve stone gate posts as entry monument Rernave existing invaslves. replant with prairie or oak savanna species tract crossing of state Pratt needs to have adequate slight lines for both trail users, warning signage,cross at aT-interseciioii IhlDEVItUAL+GROUP PADDLE LAUNCH Potential canoe slide and stairs wrth low profile fishing pier, paddle launch, and overlook 0 NOTES: ✓ Nate IoCati rn of foundation curios on the site --these should net be disturbed during site improvement projects Ifuture evaluation Orfuins needed) - Shoreline stabilization/ restoration needed In some areas ID A buffer strip of shoreline vegetation (native) to be established along much of the riverfront where feasible ▪ Structures now existing or hereinafter constructed, must be used In furtherance of passive recreational uses in compliance with easement in appendix. 250 500 Master Plan Concept: Detail Area A Rehabilitate existing garage to a picnic shelter/overlook structure with metal grate floor to see water run under the structure ADA accesslbie pedestrian trail connection to State Trail. Concrete surface (6-feet wide) from State Trail to lift le drive. Bike racks provided for bikers who want to walk the park trails Vendor/rental equipment area. in existing garage .0 Parallel Parking: 2 ADA spaces and 1 staff parking space . Preserve pond, possible 4�euse for family fishing IALA ACCESSIBLE PADDLE LAUNCH ADA accessible platform for paddle craft launch with adjacent sandy beach for group launching ADA accessible c veriook, Fishing pier, utilize existing steel sheet seawalls Selective demolition of the house, retTofltting as new recreation building 3-season flexible use space for outdoor education programming, restrooms- and boar i gyp} 418. ' Former pool room converted to crew boat storage and open-alr i>aw+lror1; access to public restrooms North Canoe/Kayak Launch The northern canoe/kayak launch will include a platform for accessible loading and unloading of kayaks and canoes for handicapped paddlers. Image Source: https://www.ez-dock.com/ owners-manuals/attachmen t/ez-launch-2/ NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Master Plan Concept: Detail Area B See Exhibit A: Expansion of public parking lot north oIZephyr Theatre & entrance road realignment Potential 20-24 space parking lot for lraiihead and south boat launch; work with Zephyr Theatre on public/private use of parking lot VI • •-r f Q Remove existing InvasIves, replant .with prairie or oak savanna species New pedestrian lril - natural surface mowed grass path lKeep above the Iloodplain} Trail crossing of State Trail needs to have adequate sight lines for both trail users, warning signage, cross at a T intersection INDIVlDUALtGROIJP PADDLE LAUNCH Potential came slide and stairs wllh low profile fishing pier, paddle launch, and ❑verlook DECEMBER 1, 2020 North Canoe Launch and Aiple Residence Focus Area Plan 0 O 0 ..ir,...rc.._.,r, 0 0 0 ID Accessible Canoe/Kayak Launch platform and beach for group launching Vendor area for rental of canoes/kayaks/ paddleboards Scull storage, Gathering space, and outdoor access to restrooms River overlook and fishing platform Vehicle turn -around and drop-off area Spur trail access to Brown's Creek State Trail Picnic shelter overlooking water flow from natural bluff runoff into pond Trail bridge overlooking pond NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN DECEMBER 1, 2020 AIPLE RESIDENCE Analysis of Existing Structure In 2016 Miller Dunwiddie was hired by the City of Stillwater to review the existing conditions of the Aiple Residence. The report identified the existing building construction: a mid-1960s two-story walkout house with a 1.5 story pool addition, totaling approximately 5,700 SF. The lower level walls are concrete block with a stone veneer above grade, and wood framed walls above with horizontal wood siding. The report observed that the home was in good condition and repair, with the following exceptions: active foundation crack at the west wall of the garage, and uneven upper level floor above garage; insect infestation in the pool addition heavy timbers; water and moisture below west entry and in pool pump room; and an undersized mechanical system reaching expected life. The report then went on to note modifications that would be required to reuse the building as a public facility, including providing ADA accessibility to each level of public use; accessible restrooms, modifications to non- complying life -safety items (railing, hand rails, fire alarms, etc); code compliance for fire separation or fire protection sprinkler; and upgraded mechanical and electrical. Two reuse options were presented at end of written report. Like the 2016 evaluation determined, the 2020 updated condition survey found the home to be in good condition with some isolated areas in need of repair. No new items were found to be of concern. ADA accessibility continues to be an impediment for reuse, requiring modification. The proposed design addresses many of the repair and modification items with changes to the structure. Remaining items, primarily moisture infiltration at the basement level, would be managed through a moisture mitigation strategy determined during the design phase, but should not be considered a deterrent for moving forward with plans to use the building. Other items that will need to be addressed and may need further study with the future building renovation include: removal of oil tanks on the property; removal of buried transformer near the house; and transfer of sanitary sewer to City sewer system. Interior Views Existing split-level entrance. January27, 2020. Existing pool room (pool is covered). Janua,, Existing stone fireplace in lower level of home. January 27, 2020. I•1 Exterior Views Front entry (west side of building). July 15, 2020. Existing tuck -under garage (north -facing facade). January 27, 2020 West -facing facade of house. July 15, 2020. Tuck -under garage and entry (northwest side of building). July 15, 2020. South -facing facade (windows to pool room). July 15, 2020. - - July 15, 2020.-- East-facing facade of house (pool room windows on left). July 15, 2020. East -facing facade of house with retaining wall terracing landscape toward the river's edge. July 15, 2020. DECEMBER 1, 2020 PROPOSED BUILDING MODIFICATIONS The shell of the building would mostly remain intact while the interior of the building would undergo renovations to be more accessible to group gatherings and provide public access. Proposed Upper Level Floor Plan OPtM.AIR COVERED EMMY/ WALKWAYI GATHERING OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW Proposed Lower Level Floor Plan LOWER LE'/a GATHERING AREA SCULL STORAGE Proposed West Elevation Proposed East Elevation CRAWL SPACE C RAWL SPACE KITCHENETTE D OECD - PEPEFJOJNG OM PROGRAM NORTH, VENDOR SPACE NORTH ► NORTH NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Features of the proposed floor plan: Envelope • Much of the existing shell (walls, roof, foundation) would remain in place. A new"upper"floor would be inserted at entry grade level (between existing basement and upper floor levels) to eliminate accessibility concerns. Existing basement would become a crawl space. • Windows will be inserted at the same locations as basement windows, to utilize existing openings in the stone. Some areas of infill or modifications would be necessary, but much of the existing stone on all elevations would remain in place. Upper Level • The main level would have open gathering areas plus a kitchenette in the main part of the building. • The fireplace/chimney would remain in the center of the building, where they are currently located. Modifications would be required with change in floor level. • Restrooms would be accessible from inside the building, as well as from an open-air walkway that is covered with the existing roof. The walkway connects the east and west yards, which requires some exterior ramping to accommodate slope changes. This exterior access to the restrooms would allow them to be used by the public when the main building is locked. Lower Level • The existing garage area at the north end would become a vendor space, and would remain at current driveway level for ease of access and deliveries. An internal stair would connect to main level if necessary/desired, but would not be intended for public use. • A gathering space would anchor the south end of the Lower Level, provide a flexible area for a variety of programming. Operable garage doors would be located on the south and east elevations, to allow for open air gatherings during comfortable weather. • Scull storage would be provided at the lower level, with access from the east elevation. The intention would be to have scull storage racks on north and south walls to double load the storage room. Scull storage program precedent image. Image Source: http://www.rudkindesign.co.uk/racking%20page1.htm Building Aesthetics Keep stone base of building. New horizontal wood siding above the stone, in a warm neutral. Precedent photos DECEMBER 1, 2020 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Site visits were conducted by FOR staff at North Aiple Park on 1/27/20 and 2/12/20 to evaluate natural resources. The site inventory is described for the three site characters of the park outlined in the concept plan: Nature Exploration, Picturesque Parkland, and Disturbed Woodland. Specific stewardship goals and management recommendations are provided. LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION The North Aiple Park property consist of a thin strip of floodplain forest along the St. Croix River. Geology of the site is dominated by relatively shallow bedrock that is frequently exposed as outcrops. Overlying soils are classified as sandy or gravelly, but in many areas have been disturbed via filling and grading from historic use. Groundwater influence is strong and several seeps are scattered throughout the site. The North Aiple Park Concept Plan delineates the site into three sections based on park character: Nature Exploration in the north, Picturesque Parkland in the center, and Disturbed Woodland in the south. Overall site topography is characterized by a generally steep, modified shoreline grading to a narrow floodplain terrace, then transitioning to steep bluffs rising to the Brown's Creek state trail and Highway 95. A former trout pond is the most prominent feature of the northern area of the site (Nature Exploration), and is formed by a steep berm adjacent to the St. Croix River. Two human -made pools are situated above the northwestern slope of the former trout pond and collect water from groundwater seeps. A more gently sloping landscaped lawn with scattered trees is located in the central portion of the site (Picturesque Parkland). The southern portion of the site (Disturbed Woodland) includes steep banks with a disturbed, flat upland terrace, with steep wooded bluffs along the western boundary. A creek fed by groundwater and stormwater runs north -south along the existing driveway and flows to the former trout pond. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN SITE INVENTORY Existing vegetation cover was inventoried for each of the three park characters, and relevant natural resource observations were also recorded. Vegetation cover within the Nature Exploration section was most varied and is described according to specific locations. Management Units were outlined based on inventory results (see map on following page). Nature Exploration Observations North Side of Former Trout Pond (Unit A) • Woody vegetation appears to have been removed from the drainage way north of the trout pond berm relatively recently. • The cleared area consists of weedy plant species characteristic of recent disturbance such as raspberry, burdock, and dock. A potential seep is dominated by cattail. West Side of Former Trout Pond (Unit B) • The west side of the former trout pond represents the most ecologically diverse area of the site due to relatively good tree and shrub diversity, bedrock plant communities, several groundwater seeps, and two groundwater -fed pools. • Although the tree and shrub community is not especially diverse, it is diverse relative to the remainder of the site with some hackberry, ironwood, willow, red oak, basswood, American elm, and pagoda dogwood. • Woody invasives are an issue in this area, but their abundance is buffered somewhat by the better tree and shrub diversity. • Exposed bedrock and groundwater seep plant communities provide additional diversity, though species composition could not be observed due to timing of the site visits in winter. • The two groundwater -fed pools (including the "grotto") provide year-round open water. Aquatic plants were observed growing sparsely in the north pool. • Aerial imagery from the early and mid-20th century indicates that this area has been filled (possibly due to deposition from the river and/or anthropogenic filling). Historic boat mooring anchors were observed in bedrock and also suggest filling in this area. East Side of Former Trout Pond (Unit C: Berm) • Very steep slopes and narrow trail. • Poor tree/shrub diversity with abundant black locust, common buckthorn, and exotic honeysuckle. Native trees include silver maple, cottonwood, and green ash with some young red oak and Eastern red cedar. Former Trout Pond (Unit I) • Water level within the trout pond appears low. • Abundant leaf litter and woody debris. • Water control structure is missing stop logs and overall condition/function is unknown. Picturesque Parkland Observations (Units D, E, and F) • This area is characterized by a landscaped open lawn, with large cottonwood and white pine and white spruce plantings (Unit E). • Several large black locust are located along the driveway (Unit D and Unit E). • White pines within the existing lawn are yellowed and appear stressed (Unit E). • Shoreline vegetation includes several native shrubs including willow, dogwood, and elderberry with box elder and green ash trees. Common and glossy buckthorn are also present along the shoreline (Unit F). Disturbed Woodland Observations (Units D, G, and H) • This area is characterized by steep banks with a narrow strip of floodplain forest (Unit G), an upland terrace with some groundwater seep wetlands (Unit H), and the steep wooded slopes leading toward the state trail (Units D and H). • The floodplain forest consists of relatively older silver maple, cottonwood, box elder, and green ash, with several mature, fruiting buckthorn (Unit G). • The upland terrace appears to have been historically maintained as a clearing and likely storage yard based on aerial imagery from the early and mid-20th century (Unit H). • The upland terrace lacks older trees and has poor woody plant diversity. It is dominated by invasives black locust and common buckthorn, with glossy buckthorn and mulberry also observed (Unit H). • Large hybrid poplars were observed on the upland terrace near the southern extent of the park and appear to be spreading (Unit H). • Several groundwater seep wetlands were observed on the upland terrace. The seeps appeared to be more disturbed than those observed near the former trout pond (Unit H). • Several historic features were observed including a wall and circular brick structure. The function of the circular brick structure is unknown and could be stormwater infrastructure or an old well (Unit H). • Considerable rubble and debris used for stabilization was observed along the shoreline. Some rubble included potentially hazardous and unsightly iron rebar (Unit G). DECEMBER 1, 2020 Proposed Vegetation Management Units Park Boundary Management Unit A - northern site rboundary (clearing) hail 14 !IM W 111 9411=1v [w.r:101Y.., }ti.14' e szOiapy crtmmu.Fhr B - west side of trout pond C - east side of trout pond (berm/shoreline) D - wooded slope E - lawn area F - shoreline of lawn area G - shoreline of disturbed woodland H - disturbed woodland I - former trout pond J - state trail corridor Aiple Park Management Units - Feel 1 C3 I NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN STEWARDSHIP GOALS AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Six natural resource goals were identified for North Aiple Park. Of these, two are focused on vegetation management and the remaining four are focused on additional assessment and natural resources implementation. Goals and recommendations are described below and identified by Management Units in the map on the previous page. Cost estimates are provided in the Implementation section. Vegetation Management Goals Goal 1: Control invasive plants. Goal 2: Enhance and restore native vegetation. Additional Assessment and Natural Resource Implementation Goals Goal 3: Protect sensitive groundwater seep wetlands. Goal 4. Assess existing bank stabilization practices. Goal 5: Highlight the natural resource value of Nature Exploration section. Goal 6. Assess feasibility of public trout pond. Potential partners for management include, but are not limited to, Washington Conservation District, MN DNR Parks and Trails, MN DOT, Great River Greening, Conservation Corps Minnesota, and St. Croix River Association. Potential funding sources include, but are not limited to, the State of Minnesota Environmental Trust Fund, Outdoor Heritage Fund, and Clean Water Fund. Goal 1: Control invasive plants. Woody invasive plants are prevalent throughout the site with common buckthorn and black locust most abundant. Exotic honeysuckle, glossy buckthorn, and mulberry are also present, with aquatic invasive plant watercress observed in the creek. Herbaceous invasive plants such as garlic mustard were not observed during winter but are likely present. We highly recommend that program/use of the former trout pond and berm (Units C and 1) are determined prior to committing resources to vegetation management in or near these areas. Recommendations: • Vegetation management near the former trout pond (Units C and 1) should be sequenced to align with planned park use in this area. For example, vegetation management should take place after potential changes to the berm, if any. Woody invasive management (Units A, 8, C, D, G, and H): • Management of woody invasives should target mature, fruiting individuals to reduce seed dispersal. Stumps should be cut and treated with herbicide prior to re -sprouting. Stems and branches with fruits should be carefully of disposed of so that seed is not spread. • Buckthorn is a prolific seeder, and areas that have been recently cleared may quickly regenerate. Following removal of mature individuals, seedling control efforts will be needed. For small seedlings less than 3/8 inch in diameter, hand -pulling or mechanical pulling is effective. Larger individuals will require cutting and stump treating with herbicide. • Flag native shrubs and tree saplings in areas of woody invasive management to protect the native species present. In the upland terrace of the Disturbed Woodland (Unit H), consider a forestry mow and herbicide treatment in conjunction with potential prairie/ savannah restoration (see Goal 2). • Monitor areas of invasive plant control to determine effectiveness and assess native tree and shrub recruitment. If native trees and shrubs fail to colonize despite control of invasive species, consider targeted plantings. • See the Implementation section for estimated costs. Woody invasive management within Highway 95 and state trail corridor (Unit J): Invasive woody vegetation and some potential hazard trees were observed along the western boundary adjacent to the state trail and extending beyond the park boundary to the west (Unit J). DECEMBER 1, 2020 Although much of this area is located outside the park boundary, this area should be managed due to its visibility from the highway and state trail. - Manage woody vegetation adjacent to state trail and Highway 95 to improve aesthetic and ecological value. • Consider partnerships with MN DNR and MN DOT to collaboratively manage this area. • Costs are itemized separately from other Units as most of Unit J is not on City property. See Implementation section for estimated costs. Watercress management (Park -wide in creek and seeps): • Management of watercress should focus on preventing spread to groundwater seep wetlands and preventing flow obstructions within the creek. Control of watercress within the creek may not be feasible. Watercress can be removed by hand or mechanically. However, reestablishment is likely without native revegetation, and establishment of native vegetation within the creek may not be feasible. Costs for inventory are included in the Implementation section. No specific management action is recommended, but the City should be aware of potential issues associated with watercress. Herbaceous invasive management (Park -wide): • Conduct an inventory of herbaceous plant cover during the growing season.This natural resources assessment did not assess herbaceous plant cover due to snow cover and lack of active growth. Herbaceous invasive species such as garlic mustard are common to the region and may require management. • Potential management costs are included in the Implementation section. Costs for complete inventory are included in the Implementation section. Goal 2: Enhance and restore native vegetation. Several areas of the site were identified for potential vegetation restoration and enhancement activities. These activities will improve ecological and aesthetic value of the park. Recommendations: Nature Exploration (Units A, B, C, and D) If native trees and shrubs fail to colonize despite control of invasive species following management, consider targeted plantings. • Assess northern site boundary in area of recent tree removal during the growing season (Unit A).This area appeared disturbed during the site visits but assessment was limited due to snow cover and lack of active vegetation growth. Vegetation restoration opportunities in this area could be integrated with stormwater practices and buffering of residential use to north. • Estimated costs are included in the Implementation section. Picturesque Parkland (Units E & F): • Remove ecologically unsuitable (white spruce) and stressed conifers (white pine) within the Picturesque Parkland (Unit E). Remove white spruce to reflect more appropriate native plant communities to the region. Assess tree health and potential removal of white pines. Although large white pines are ecologically appropriate to the St. Croix River Valley, the white pines on site appear stressed and may be too close to the water table. • Enhance the existing shoreline of the Picturesque Parkland lawn area where few shrubs and little buffer is present (Unit F). - Plant cuttings of native shrubs such as willow and dogwood along shoreline. Plantings should include a pollinator friendly buffer. Integrate pollinator friendly plantings in open areas (primarily Picturesque Parkland) where compatible with park use (Unit E). • See Appendix A: Table 3 for estimated costs. Disturbed Woodland (Units H and G): If native trees and shrubs fail to colonize despite control of invasive species following management, consider targeted plantings. • Restore the upland terrace of the Disturbed Woodland to prairie or savannah plant community (Unit H). - Consider a forestry mow and herbicide treatment to remove invasives and prepare the site for restoration. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN - Consider large scale seeding/planting of prairie or savannah vegetation to provide pollinator habitat and restore a native plant community. - Consider the recommendations of the Phase I ESA prepared for the site when planning for potential soil disturbance. Assess soil suitability for supporting native vegetation. • Estimated costs are included in the Implementation setion. Additional Assessment and Natural Resource Implementation Goals Costs for additional assessment recommendations are estimated as lump sum (Appendix A: Table 4). Costs for additional natural resource implementation recommendations are highly variable depending on scope and design and therefore are not provided at this time. Goal 3: Protect sensitive groundwater seep wetlands. Groundwater seeps have soft soils sensitive to disturbance and may harbor unique native plant communities. Recommendations (Park -wide): Assessment: • Inventory and map groundwater seeps throughout the park. • Conduct wetland delineations in areas where specific plans will be advanced to comply with local, state, and federal protections. Natural Resource Implementation: • Design park infrastructure to discourage or prohibit foot -access to seeps. Goal 4. Assess existing bank stabilization practices. Considerable rubble and debris used for stabilization was observed along the shoreline. Banks are very steep within the Disturbed Woodland section. Recommendations (Unit G): Assessment: • Consider selective removal of rubble and debris where feasible. Natural Resource Implementation: • Perform an assessment of existing banks in Unit G (Disturbed Woodland). Long-term planning could include more visually appealing bank stabilization practices. Goal 5: Highlight the natural resource value of Nature Exploration section. The west side of the trout pond is a natural resources strength and could be used an interpretive opportunity (Units B and 1). This is solely a conceptual recommendation and costs are not provided. Recommendations (Units B & I): Interactions between groundwater and surface water (e.g. seepage, pooling, stream on south end of trout pond, St. Croix River) are currently accessible and could be highlighted further. • Bedrock and seep communities provide access to unique plant communities and should be preserved and protected. Goal 6. Assess feasibility of public trout pond The reuse of the former trout pond for public trout fishing is an intriguing re -use of existing park elements, but requires careful consideration of technical and regulatory feasibility. Recommendations (Unit I): Assessment: • Conduct a feasibility assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the following considerations: - ADA-accessibility, particularly along narrow trail and steep slopes of east berm. Will it be necessary to lower berm and increase width? - Functional integrity of the berm (e.g. water tightness, stability) - Functional integrity of the water control structure - Bathymetry and sediment deposition of the pond (how deep is the basin?) - Sustainability of public trout fishery (what population size could it support?) - Aquatic invasive species issues with St. Croix River and stocking (could AIS be introduced from stock?) - Correspondence with DNR Fisheries Division regarding stocking regulations DECEMBER 1, 2020 POTENTIAL PERMITTING NEEDS FOR PROJECTS Wild and Scenic Rivers Act Section 7A Evaluation — to review access points: fishing pier locations, sloping a bank more, any interface between land and water • Authorized through a Corps permit • May be a DNR Public Waters Permit • High Water Level (in NAD 1988 datum) for the St. Croix River in this area: 679.6' • Note that MnDNR, WiDRNR, and Army Corps may have different values for OHWL • NPS offers commercial use permit for rental and tours with canoes/kayaks/SUP • Middle St. Croix WMO—may have rules and permitting requirements Other permits may be needed from the following agencies: - City - WMO - Corps - DNR IMPLEMENTATION & COST ESTIMATES PHASING Improvements to the North Aiple Park property will be developed and constructed over time as opportunities arise and funding allows. This chapter identifies phasing projects according to a general timeline: • Short Term:These are high priority projects that will allow access and limited public use of the site. These are also projects that need to be completed prior to other projects. The timeline for Short Term projects is 0-5 years, but some projects could be completed later if funding does not allow completion within five years. • Mid Term:These are highly desired projects that may be more expensive than Short Term projects or need other site work to occur before they can be constructed. The timeline for Mid Term projects is 3-10 years. • Long Term: Large projects that require more engagement and planning are in this category. These projects are also typically more expensive than Short Term and Mid Term projects.The timeline for Long Term projects is 10+ years, but if opportunities arise with partnerships or funding, these projects may be constructed sooner. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT PHASING PLAN Short Term Projects ` A Site Access • Entry drive improvements B Spur trail to Brown's Creek State Trail C River edge trail D North Kayak/Canoe Launch E Safety and Security improvements • Railing and other improvements to fishing/overlook platform near house • Northern boundary screening Mid Term Projects F Parking Lot expansion G Picnic Shelter/Pond overlook (conversion of old shed/garage) H Pond trail and bridge Trail amenities • Benches, picnic tables, overlooks Long Term Projects i J Southern kayak/canoe launch and fishing pier • Trail connection to parking lot K Aiple residence renovation Development Project Phasing E I, I, 1 11 II II 1 11 11 1 11 II 1 J DECEMBER 1, 2020 DEVELOPMENT COSTS Development cost estimates are planning level cost estimates based on rounded quantities on the conceptual master plan. Costs are based on 2020 numbers of previous construction projects in the Twin Cities metro area. Estimated costs included a per unit cost plus 30% for design and engineering (10%), mobilization and permitting (10%), and site grading and site prep (10%). A detail of the estimated costs can be found on page 45 in the Appendix to this plan. More detailed cost estimates will need to be completed as construction documents are developed for each park improvement item. Development Cost Estimate ITEM Site Access Spur Trail to Bro Creek State Trai, River edge trail North Kayak/Ca Launch Safety and Secu Improvements Short Term Subt Parking Lot Expo Picnic Shelter/P overlook Pond trail and b► Trail amenities Mid Term Subto Southern kayak/ launch and fishi Aiple residence renovation Long Term Subtc TOTAL COST OF TOTAL COST + 2 ITEM DETAIL tal ng PHASE ESTIMATED COST r Entry drive improvements --proposed bituminous driveway, turn -around and ADA parking spots Short Term $322,744.50 Retaining wall (average 4 ft tall) Sidewalk at turn-around--6 ft wide concrete wn's 6' wide compacted gravel Short Term $29,120.00 Bike racks 8 ft wide paved trail to woods edge Short Term $108,160.00 Soft surface trail through woods --clear trail, compacted soft surface Short Term 10 ADA Accessible Kayak/Canoe Launch Short Term $47,320.00 Accessible pathway to launch--8 ft wide paved or compacted gravel trail rity Railing on fishing/overlook platform Short Term Mid Term $61,230.00 $568,574.50 Concrete surface on fishing/overlook platform Landscaping and Screening --trees, shrubs, native grasses and forbs otal ins►on Bituminous surface $143,000.00 Portable restroom with concrete pad (annual cost) and Conversion of old shed/garage Mid Term $260,000.00 idg 8 ft wide paved trail to grotto and overlook Mid Term $36,673.00 Rehabilitate existing foot bridge Upgrades to soft surface trail on berm Benches/Picnic Tables (8) Mid Term $78,000.00 Overlooks (2) canoe Canoe slide Long Term $517,673.00 $148,980.00 pier Dock/Pier Trail connection to parking lot--8 ft wide paved trail IIII rtal ALL PHASES 0% CONTINGENCY Long Term $1,300,000.00 $1,448,980.00 $2,535,227.50 $3,042,273.00 NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PHASING & COST ESTIMATE Total management costs were based on 10-year management plans. Total 10 years costs for all vegetation management are $165,516. Cost estimation is based on: a) 2020 dollars, b) subcontracting all implementation and necessary oversight, and c) assumption that all Management Units are implemented concurrently. Management units have varying amounts of invasive species cover and therefore varying management inputs/ costs, but for simplicity costs are averaged across Units. Vegetation Management Cost Estimate Summary UNIT YEAR ACTION ESTIMATED COST UNIT A, 8, C, D, G, & H (Woodland invasive management & woodland restoration) 1 A - Prepare detailed invasive species removal & site restoration plans B - Prepare biddable documents & assist in securing qualified contractor(s) $ 3,900 2 A - Identify plant material to be protected B - Remove & treat woody invasives; C -Treat herbaceous vegetation and germinating woody invasives D - Complete cover crop seeding for barren areas $ 21,240 3-4 Annualize invasive species management cost (years —1-3 post initiation) $ 9,744 5 A - Native overseeding [1 k/acre] & bareroot tree/shrub planting & protection [1 k/ acre] B - Continued invasive species management (year —4 post initiation) $ 29,292 6 10 Annualize invasive species & native vegetation establishment management (5+ years post woody invasive species removal) $ 20,916 UNITS A, B, C, D, G, & H 10-YEAR COST ESTIMATE: $ 85,092 UNIT J (Woodland invasive management & woodland restoration) 1 A - Prepare detailed invasive species removal & site restoration plans B - Prepare biddable documents & assist in securing qualified contractor(s) $ 2 A - Identify plant material to be protected B - Remove & treat woody invasives; C -Treat herbaceous vegetation and germinating woody invasives D - Complete cover crop seeding for barren areas $ 11,520 3-5 Annualize invasive species management cost (years —1-4 post initiation) $ 6,912 6-10 Annualize invasive species management cost (years 5+ post initiation) $ 8,832 UNITS J -YEAR COST ESTIMATE: $ 27,264 UNIT E and F (Picturesque Parkland) 1 Prepare biddable landscape plan & assist in securing contractor $ 9,360 2 A - Remove undesirable and/or dying conifers B - Execute landscape plan (foundation plantings; —1 acre of turf conversion to native savanna via seeding; and shoreline plantings) $ 33,900 3-7 Annualized maintenance cost (0-5 years post sowing) $ 6,660 8-10 Annualized maintenance cost (5+ years post sowing) $ 3,240 UNITS E & F TOTAL 10-YEAR COST ESTIMATE: $ 53,160 DECEMBER 1, 2020 POTENTIAL FUNDING OPTIONS, SOURCES, AND PARTNERS National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) manages river access at several points along the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway. The NPS and the St. Croix River Association manage K-12 programs together ("Rivers are Alive"), and they would like to have a place in Stillwater where kids can touch the river. NPS may be interested in a partnership with a canoe/ gear rental stand (would authorize outfitters with a commercial use permit). Gateway Communities Cities or towns that lie just outside major national tourist attractions are called Gateway Communities. Stillwater or North Aiple Park could be positioned as a Gateway Community to the St. Croix River in order to potentially be considered for funding for river recreation facilities. St. Croix River Association The St. Croix River Association (SCRA) is an official nonprofit partner with the National Park Service. The SCRA works closely with the NPS on programs; they work with 6,000 K-12 kids annually. Programs include paddling and outdoor education on the river. The SCRA may be a funding partner for a kayak/canoe launch on the property and an indoor outdoor education/ programming facility at the park. Federal Lands Access Program The Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) may have funding to support a paddle launch on the North Aiple property because it would be a linkage to the river. A grant proposal should be crafted to position North Aiple Park as a place of access (gateway) to the National Scenic Riverway to encourage it to be eligible for consideration. There will be another call for proposals in late 2021 or 2022 because FLAP is on a 3-year cycle. National Parks Foundation The National Parks Foundation is the official charitable partner of the National Park Service. They work to provide resources and support for parks and programming. Mississippi Park Connection The nonprofit partner of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area is Mississippi Park Connection. It may be a source of information on a potential canoe/ kayak rental kiosk. Minnesota DNR Conservation Partners Legacy (CPL) program through the DNR provides funding for habitat restoration projects. DNR School Forests and Outdoor Classroom grants are potential options for North Aiple Park; a school partner would be needed to utilize the resources. Other Funding Sources The Middle St. Croix Watershed Management Organization and the Washington County Soil and Water Conservation District may have resources for water quality and vegetation restoration projects on the site. Local and national outdoor recreation groups and organizations may be sought out to partner on implementation of recreation facilities. NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS Trail types and surface management TRAIL SURFACE ADA ACCESSIBLE PERVIOUS/ IMPERVIOUS MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS LIFE CYCLE Compacted decomposed granite chip / Compacted limestone ADA trail/ access- has to be maintained to stay ADA accessible Needs to have a compacted base, so not really a pervious surface - but potential to get credit for pervious Needs to be regraded and compacted from time to time, bike tires will dig in if wet Depends on amount of erosion and use; regrade and resurface every 15-25 years Bituminous trail with chip seal (granite chip topping for the feel of natural pat h. ADA accessible- less maintenance needed to keepImpervious ADA accessible Less erosion potential than crushedgranite/ limestone Depends on amount of use; approx. 20 25 pp years ituminous Most ADA accessible Impervious Crack seal every 4-5 years; Seal coat every 8-10 years Replace every 20- 25 years r- Mowed grass (most na feel) Not considered ADA accessible Pervious, but due to compaction, surface will be mostly impervious Mowing multiple times through the season May need to address drainage issues, roots, weeds over time Infrastructure and Utilities Items that will need to be addressed in coordination with the Aiple residence renovation and may need further study include: removal of oil tanks on the property; removal of buried transformer near the house; and transfer of sanitary sewer to City sewer system. Electrical connections maybe needed for the picnic shelter at the former garage site. Water connections may be desired in the future at the south end of the site near the trail parking. DECEMBER 1, 2020 APPENDIX CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANNING (2016-2017) During 2016 and 2017, the City worked with a consulting team to evaluate existing site conditions, analyze potential opportunities, and develop preliminary concepts. The products from that process are on the following pages: Existing Conditions Site Analysis Precedents/Trends/Ideas Concept Plan NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS Zephyr Theatre 0 250 500 Site Photos Natural and Ca 1Raised Path around Trout Pond Old Trout Pond Dilapidated Bridge Garage (creek runs beneath) Beach/Boat Launch Creek at base of bluff Mid-century Rambler Lawn with scattered landscape beds and remnant foundations Lawn with rows of evergreens ded Lawn Tree -lined Entry Drive rance w Densely vegetated, swampy woods Legend VIC (Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Site) - possible non -petroleum contamination 1,000 FEMA Flood Zones 500-year 100-year • Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Site Non-native deciduous woodland Midwest dry limestone/dolostone cliff Oak forest mesic subtype Short grasses and mixed trees with impervious cover - St. Croix River Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond 1,500 2,000 Feet DECEMBER 1, 2020 SITE ANALYSIS Space for path; partially benched into bluff - could provide secondary access_. onto site . An improved crossing from Elm Street would facilitate neighborhood access to site 0 Pond filled with duckweed/mucky in places • Aeration could help Natural Pool and Cave • Major point of interest i" Re -engineering slope to prevent erosion and 1,1 introduce beneficial species would be ideal iI /--i Dilapidated Bridge • Used to be a lower path around pond • C uld create a boardwalk to introduce affother experience/ viewpoint Garage (creek runs beneath) i • Could be repurposed to provide information for natural r +/- 10' Berm along either side of path • Very steep • Some buckthorn/undesirable species ,;;, resources interpretation + room for equipment storage Jy Beach/Boat Launch Creek at base of bluff Mid-century Rambler • Requires 1 million+ in HVAC replacement, adapted interiors, and ADA updates in order to convert to a public space Lawn with scattered landscape beds and remnant foundations Landscaping does not create spaces- should be removed or reconfigured Remnant foundations here could be highlighted and feature interpretive elements Lawn with rows of evergreens • Spruces take up space without benefit. Should be removed or limbed up if possible. dequate space/grade for a canoe/kayak launch if preferred to boat launch at beach, or an additional put -in is desired Wooded Lawn Tree -lined Entry Drive Vehicular Entrance ; iiw i ;* Densely vegetated, swampy woods -41 = / h i • Many invasives/undesirable species present • Scattered demolition debris (bricks, rebar, wire, etc.) CD'rD • 2.5 acre VIC Area may contain impacted soils below debris A- (unknown) �. • Could be selectively cleared and paved for expanded � ; parking, or kept natural for seasonal natural surface trails i (snowshoeing/hiking), or an off leash dog park 'p 250 500 Gateway Opportunity into Park from Downtown 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN PRECEDENTS/TRENDS/ IDEAS Bike & Kayak Rental Stations along the Brown's Creek State Trail for Bike -Paddle Loops Ce... r • _1_:511 • • 74. Cot 3E 3931,31I I .1fl.t 1EBE V' PloPmd vmon F.r 1 9 Biocaching: Observing and reporting different plants, birds, and other wildlife via digital app Orienteering Courses Expanded network of natural surface trails Canoe Slide Fish Cleaning Table Flexible Group Programming and/or Passive Gathering Spaces Off -leash Dog Area No Mow Meadow Bio-bag Erosion Control/ Slope Restoration Shoreline Restoration Foraging/ Food Forest Kayak Camping CONCEPT PLAN Site Character c 0 n 0 0 N co 0 table restroom Pedestrian connection to state trail. Grass surface to encourage pedestrians from state trail to use park trail, but discourage bikers. Bike racks provided at trailhead for bikers who want to walk the park trails, rAdd a natural vegetation strip between driveway and creek where feasible t Potential 20-24 space parking lot with portable restrooms (See Exhibit A for potential layout). Consult MnDOT on R.O.W. use Design entrance to encourage vehicles to park in lot, discourage driving into park (see Exhibit A) , — NOTES: » Shoreline stabilization/restoration needed in some areas » A buffer strip of shoreline vegetation (native) to be established along much of the riverfront where feasible » Structures now existing or hereinafter constructed, must be used in furtherance of passive recreational uses such dockage, walk in boat launching, walking paths, nature observation, picnicking and trail access, while protecting values of the St. Croix River, the MN State Trail amenity and in furtherance of the recreational needs of a national, Buffer residential use from park use with vegetation and topography Highlight natural pool and grotto as a feature / interpretive opportunity Improve existing path around former trout pond into ADA accessible natural surface trail loop, if economically and environmentally feasible Preserve former trout pond, possible reuse for tout/family fishing Extend and improve existing trail route and rehabilitate existing foot bridge feature Repurpose existing garage for beach and paddle craft put -in storage ADA accessible beach with paddle craft put -in ADA accessible fishing pier, utilize .existing piles Drop-off zone with 2 ADA parking spaces for paddle craft put -in Improve existing lawn as picnic area, preserve or repurpose existing landscaping, potential for two 10'x12' picnic shelters Preserve lawn, landscaping and trees, interpretive opportunity at old mill foundations. See Exhibit B for location and general use of structures in 1898 GROTTO / POOL NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS New pedestrian trail - natural CANOE/KAYAK RENTAL surface Preserve trees, replace lawn with no -mow native grasses Improve existing tree -lined driveway for beach, paddle put -in, fishing pier and ADA parking access (occasional wider stretches needed to allow oncoming vehicles to pass by) 100 Year flood elevation Preserve stone gate posts as entry monument Vehicular entrance Potential pedestrian trail segment Preserve densely vegetated area, long term opportunity for restoration Park /downtown trail gateway Alternate fishing pier location PICNIC LAWN WM atamij lit,-0.. , : L.—F,k.. 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 FISHING PIER as shore fishing, transient the scenic and ecological state and local clientele. 2,000 Feet NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN ZEPHYR THEATRE PARKING EXPANSION: EXHIBIT A Access paint same as current. but a 90 degree intersection created. Parking lot extension in dark grey rep resew s 24 potential spaces for the park_ Parking lot in light grey to be constructed by Theater_ DECEMBER 1, 2020 CONCEPT PLAN: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS r.e'Mo TA.rni -71 Lh 4r I+.r4 w..w:n. -.d,-...._.4_ -- -.r.-s, trill+Jr.l wlr4i.rr4+l • 'iLLLr� L' kY F.I.r•a w.iarftr.Y �I1 '..wy1r .'r'il #.�V+��Ir• r,.IYI gum.a..naai1 ..Iw .Y,I.L.F+II, +-r .,411 lye r+! MA 11.11,14, 4.F ar{L +e •431 LY..laII #M h a..t.aa�-1CIF i„+M... r'I •�Y •PL ..+I M.I....III... „I. • Y{r.4ayl 1 4.yl N. no Y Su. Line rr4iim. . w 1114. • rl--rw1 .I •.rr nw Ala-I..wti.l y.,rt ll..rti w,..r. W 4.1 • rliw r..1'r...l .a.c • t .I r y ..+ HLL'M4L1.1n....I.Ir. W .+.L.11.0 . iihrrai IJ.ol three.iirp.liilr.Inn-rl li I+i.la.Il.lr„j .Lr1.f1.1W 4lII 14 #ti41.4♦a+rrIWLleat EXISTING 1TEM 5Q FOOTAGE abibm1Ahex40' 71.11, finding Home See foamy! S,1M0 €11L711g Storage GLragr 480 Other &JOIN Imprric n Sufrres 0881 Total LLisling hrprnxru Surface 01 845 S FOOTAGE PROPOSED ITEM bislo9 How, 5154 fv ianin 5.{93 ' • • toppyed Rachnp Lae wdhn 8 3$1 01pvPTW.Ily "' 0rowed T.el wly-. Side Flee tonlda TSO I{ I- Ropo,edTrd round Fro -Le Pend 12.111! !r.. hoF.r.'ti dnP•4noLel100n439, 0,150 Tun,FnmLrd ar.deOA Poling 5 IFi. eallortleempMmel{Hfra.v{I 125I3 - - - IF1 - @4M Lloglo ie rd1 II.I - Boos Mery South 803 'III - Nor Leming South 191 .1! •Deer PIc]O,ed Tr.IIS 44tr4l 1r.5•ad TSul 1.1e. yr4eel Ore.:m.14'mi Scrra;e xiy.t eip4p pr Aver, 74.471 114MLILrlIA414441shall r0.41.I.2e1.4 Ik or...44d no-Lo +.ANh 114aI,Ia..14.0.11 IItWl Snow Lit 1w4Yw1r Wr 4 I10,14.*1, rFIYIr, rik.14411 Ma.MYFY *41• .14.1 Vol irrIWll.. 2S0 SOD 44 NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT COST ESTIMATE DETAIL ITEM ITEM DETAIL PHASE ITEM SUBTOTAL (includes 30% additional)* EST. COST QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE Site Access Entry drive improvements --proposed bituminous driveway, turn -around and ADA parking spots Short Term $322,744.50 $212,100.00 35,350 SF $6.00 Retaining wall (average 4 ft tall) Short Term $30,000.00 400 SFF $75.00 Sidewalk atturn-around--6ftwide concrete Short Term $6,165.00 137 LF $45.00 Spur Trail to Brown's Creek State Trail 6' wide compacted gravel Short Term $29,120.00 $20,400.00 510 LF $40.00 Bike racks Short Term $2,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $2,000.00 River edge trail 8 ft wide paved trail to woods edge Short Term $108,160.00 $28,800.00 720 LF $40.00 Soft surface trail through woods-- clear trail, compacted soft surface Short Term $54,400.00 1,360 LF $40.00 North Kayak/Canoe Launch ADA Accesible launch (EZ Launch) Short Term $47,320.00 $30,000.00 1 EACH $30,000.00 Accessible pathwaytolaunch--8ft wide paved or compacted gravel trail Short Term $6,400.00 160 $40.00 Safety and Security Improvements Railing on fishing/overlook platform Short Term $61,230.00 $7,600.00 95 LF $80.00 concrete surface on fishing/overlook platform Short Term $4,500.00 750 SF $6.00 Landscaping and Screening --trees, shrubs, native grasses and forbs Short Term $35,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $35,000.00 SUBTOTAL Short Term $437,365.00 TOTAL SHORTTERM COST* $568,574.50 Parking Lot Expansion Bituminous surface Mid Term $143,000.00 $105,000.00 17,500 SF $6.00 Portable restroom with concrete pad (annual cost) Mid Term $5,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $5,000.00 Picnic Shelter/Pond overlook (conversion of old shed/garage) Mid Term $260,000.00 $200,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $200,000.00 Pond trail and bridge 8 ft wide paved trail to grotto and overlook Mid Term $36,673.00 $5,760.00 960 LF $6.00 Rehabilitate existing foot bridge Mid Term $10,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $10,000.00 Upgrades to soft surface trail on berm Mid Term $12,450.00 830 LF $15.00 Trail amenities benches Mid Term $78,000.00 $20,000.00 8 EACH $2,500.00 overlooks Mid Term $40,000.00 2 EACH $20,000.00 SUBTOTAL $398,210.00 TOTAL MIDTERM COST* $517,673.00 Southern kayak/canoe launch and fishing pier Canoe slide Long Term $148,980.00 S50,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $50,000.00 Dock/Pier Long Term $50,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $50,000.00 Trail connection to parking lot--8 ft wide paved trail Long Term $14,600.00 365 LF $40.00 Aiple residence renovation Long Term $1,300,000.00 $1,000,000.00 1 LUMP SUM $1,000,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,114,600.00 TOTAL LONG TERM COST* $1,448,980.00 TOTAL COST OF ALL PHASES $2,535,227.50 $1,950,175.00 TOTAL COST WITH 20% CONTINGENCY $3,042,273.00 *30% additional includes: Design and Engineering (10%) + Mobilization and permitting (10%) + Site Grading and site prep (10%) DECEMBER 1, 2020 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT COST ESTIMATE DETAIL Table 1. Cost estimate for invasive plant control and, if necessary, native plant revegetation in Units A, B, C, D, G, and H. We highly recommend tha program/use of the former trout pond and berm (Units C and 11 are determined Drior to committing resources to vegetation management in or near these areas. A 8 C D E F G H 1 J UNIT(S) TOTAL ACRES YEAR ACTIONS PLANNING/OBS. HOURS COST E*Ave rate of $130/hr IMPLEMENTATION ACRE COST B*G 20% CONTGY. `* 20% SUBTOTAL F+H+I UNIT A, B, C, D, G, & H (Woodland invasive management & woodland restoration) 9.2 1B A - Prepare detailed invasive species removal & site restoration plans - Prepare biddable documents & assist in securing qualified contractor(s) 25 $ 3,250 $ - $ - $ 650 $ 3,900 2 A - Identify plant material to be protected B - Remove & treat woody invasives; C- Treat herbaceous vegetation and germinating woody invasives D - Complete cover crop seeding for barren areas 30 $ 3,900 $ 1,500 $ 13,800 $ 3,540 $ 21,240 3 Annualize invasive species management cost (years -1-3 post initiation) 10 $ 1,300 $ 300 $ 2,760 $ 812 $ 4,872 4 10 $ 1,300 $ 300 $ 2,760 $ 812 $ 4,872 5 A - Native overseeding [1 k/acre] & bareroot tree/shrub planting & protection [1 k/acre] B - Continued invasive species management (year -4 post initiation) 25 $ 3,250 $ 2,300 $ 21,160 $ 4,882 $ 29,292 6 Annualize invasive species & native vegetation establishment management (5+ years post woody invasive species removal) 10 $ 1,300 $ 350 $ 3,220 $ 904 $ 5,424 7 10 $ 1,30$ $ 35$ $ 3,22$ $ 904 $ 5,424 8 5 $ 650 $ 300 $ 2,760 $ 682 $ 4,092 9 5 $ 650 $ 200 $ 1,840 $ 498 $ 2,988 10 5 $ 650 $ 200 $ 1,840 $ 498 $ 2,988 $ $ $ $ UNITS A, B, C, D, G, & H 10-YEAR COST ESTIMATE: 135 17,550 53,360 14,182 85,092 Table 2. Cost estimate for invasive plant control in Unit I. Costs are itemized separately from other invasive plant management as it is not City property. Planning and observation/inspection time accounted for in Unit A, B, C, D, G, and H Table. A B C D E F G H 1 J UNIT(S) TOTAL ACRES YEAR ACTIONS PLANNING/OBS. HOURS COST E*Ave rate of $130/hr IMPLEMENTATION ACRE COST B*G 20% CONTGY. (?0 * SUBTOTAL F+H+I UNIT J (Woodland invasive management & woodland restoration) 6.4 1 A - Prepare detailed invasive species removal & site restoration plans B - Prepare biddable documents & assist in securing qualified contractor(s) 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2 A - Identify plant material to be protected B - Remove & treat woody invasives; C- Treat herbaceous vegetation and germinating woody invasives D - Complete cover crop seeding for barren areas 0 $ $ 1,500 $ 9,600 $ 1,920 $ 11,520 3 Annualize invasive species management cost (years -1-4 post initiation) 0 $ $ 300 $ 1,920 $ 384 $ 2,304 4 0 $ - $ 300 $ 1,920 $ 384 $ 2,304 5 0 $ $ 300 $ 1,920 $ 384 $ 2,304 6 Annualize invasive species management cost (years 5+ post initiation) 0 $ $ 250 $ 1,600 $ 320 $ 1,920 7 0 $ $ 250 $ 1,600 $ 320 $ 1,920 8 0 $ - $ 250 $ 1,600 $ 320 $ 1,920 9 0 $ $ 200 $ 1,280 $ 256 $ 1,536 10 0 $ $ 200 $ 1,280 $ 256 $ 1,536 $ $ $ $ UNITS 1-YEAR COST ESTIMATE: 0 - 22,720 4,544 27,264 46 NORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN Table 3. Cost estimate for vegetation enhancement in Units E and F. A 8 C D E F G H 1 J UNIT(S) TOTAL ACRES YEAR ACTIONS PLANNING/OBS. HOURS COST E*Ave rate of $130/hr IMPLEMENTATION L.S. COST 20% CONTGY. (ZQ� SUBTOTAL F+H+I UNIT E and F (Picturesque Parkland) 3.2 1contractor Prepare biddable landscape plan & assist in securing 60 $ 7,800 $ - $ 1,560 $ 9,360 2 A - Remove undesirable and/or dying conifers B - Execute landscape plan (foundation plantings; —1 acre of turf conversion to native savanna via seeding; and shoreline plantings) 25 $ 3,250 $ 25,000 $ 5,650 $ 33,900 3 Annualized maintenance cost (0-5 years post sowing) 5 $ 650 $ 500 $ 230 $ 1,380 4 5 $ 650 $ 500 $ 230 $ 1,380 5 5 $ 650 $ 500 $ 230 $ 1,380 6 5 $ 650 $ 400 $ 210 $ 1,260 7 5 $ 650 $ 400 $ 210 $ 1,260 8 Annualized maintenance cost (5+ years post sowing) 5 $ 650 $ 250 $ 180 $ 1,080 9 5 $ 650 $ 250 $ 180 0 1,080 10 5 $ 650 $ 250 $ 180 $ 1,080 $ $ $ $ UNITS E & F TOTAL 10-YEAR COST ESTIMATE: 125 16,250 28,050 8,860 53,160 Table 4. Additional Assessment Recommendations TASK UNIT ESTIMATED 2020 COST Complete park -wide growing season floristic inventory. Complete inventory of herbaceous invasive plant. PARK -WIDE $1,500 Inventory and map groundwater seeps park -wide. Evaluate seeps and creek for watercress impacts and spread. PARK -WIDE $1,000 Conduct wetland delineations where specific plans will be advanced. PARK -WIDE $4,000 Assess feasibility of public trout pond and evaluate integrity of embankment and associated outlet. Complete associated soil borings and geotechnical evaluation. UNITS C & I $15,000-$30,000 Assess existing banks for stability and vet potential improvements for instabilities. UNIT G $3,000 DECEMBER 1, 2020 SUMMARY OF ONLINE INPUT (SOCIAL PINPOINT) The following charts and graphs represent a summary of the input received during February, 2020, on the Social Pinpoint interactive mapping application and survey. What improvement would you most like to see at North Aiple Park? Response Tags from April 09, 2020 Survey Export Fishing Restoration Education Restore Trout Pond Accessible Preserve Rowing Pedestrian Safety mm Commercial mm Nature Play mm Parking mm Winter Recreation - Active Recreation - Art - Birding - Boating - Gardens - Screening - Trailhegd I I I Beach Passive Recreation Paddle Sports 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 How important is preservation and reuse of the existing building? April 09, 2020 Survey Export Very Important Somewhat Important Neutral Not Important INORTH AIPLE PARK MASTER PLAN 15- 12 9 6 3 0 Paddle Sports J Passive Recreation 15 12- 9 6 3 0 Restoration 15 12 9 6 3 0- Topics from April 09, 2020 Social Pinpoint Comments Export Highest Priority Like It! Highest Priority Dislike It. Like It! J Like It! J Having a launch for canoes, kayaks, and paddleboards is over- whelmingly desired. People cite it as a missing amenity in Stillwa- ter and the difficulties competing with motorized launches else- where. Some want a put -in very close to parking, for ease of launching, or a dedicated drop-off/pick-up parking zone. Others desire rentals so that parking and additional impervious is not necessary (and so the launch is accessible for those who do not have their own crafts). New ideas include using the garage as a cold storage space that could be rented by paddlers who want to keep their craft onsite. Generally, people love the peace and quiet of being in a park along the river. There is good support for walking trails throughout the park, with mixed reviews of whether the trails should be natural surface (suggested for the State Trail Connection to discourage biking into the park) or accessible paved. People are intrigued by the grotto and trout pond and would like to explore those areas. People overwhelmingly support places to picnic (tables and shel- ters) and access to restrooms/drinking water. Generally, people like the idea of biking to access the park (and want bike parking within sight of amenities), but some are concerned about the park becom- ing a throughway for cyclists and skateboarders. New ideas include adding a seating area with firepit, including an informal (loose parts) nature play area, and having amenities for dog owners. There were many comments in favor of restoration of habitat within the park, especially along the shoreline. Suggestions include replacing lawn with no mow or pollinator lawns, using native plants, removing invasives, avoiding unnatural lighting, and using vegetative shoreline restoration rather than rip rap. In general, people want to preserve the areas of natural beauty and the peaceful, quiet access to nature along the river. DECEMBER 1, 2020 15 12 9 6 3 0 Beach Parking 15- 12 9 6 3 0 Topics from April 09, 2020 Social Pinpoint Comments Export Highest Priority Like It! J Highest Priority Dislike It. Fishing 15 12 9 6 3 0 Like It! Highest Priority Like It! People frequently mention liking a beach when they mention water and/or paddle access. Parking was a contentious issue in the Social pinpoint, with passionate respondents posting multiple times about it. Those in favor thought it was essential to older visitors, those with disabili- ties, and to paddle access. Others thought cars should not be allowed in the park, adding impervious surface is irresponsible, and there is parking available downtown. People who mentioned the pier or fishing were very supportive of it and labeled fishing access a high priority. Some suggested having two fishing pier locations and another said one would be enough. Having an accessible fishing pier with ADA trail is desired. 50 15- 12 9 6 3 0 Education Topics from April 09, 2020 Social Pinpoint Comments Export Highest Priority Like It! J Reuse the Building 15 12 Highest Priority Dislike It. Like It! Among those who mentioned education, three deemed it the park's highest priority. Some suggest reusing the building as an educational center, while others want to see both indoor and outdoor space available for hands-on education, including acces- sible places to access the water and creative nature play areas for schools, clubs, and the general public. One respondent thought that the building was the highest priority, but two others had doubts about the cost/potential success of attempting to repurpose it. In general, people want places to picnic and store/rent paddle craft, along with places to gather for educa- tion, but they are open to those things being done in open shelters or a new on -site facility. s